Forestar Group Inc.
Annual Report 2017

FORESTAR
2017
ANNUAL
REPORT

F O R E S T A R A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 0 1 7

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K
È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017
or
‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934

For the Transition Period From

to

Commission File Number: 001-33662

Forestar Group Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

26-1336998
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

10700 Pecan Park Blvd., Suite 150
Austin, Texas 78750
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (512) 433-5200
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building Two, Suite 500
Austin, Texas 78746
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act

of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will

not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. È

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and
emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer È Accelerated filer ‘ Non-accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ Emerging growth company ‘

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with

any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ‘ No È
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing sales price of the Common Stock

on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2017, was approximately $707 million. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors, and
ten percent beneficial owners of the registrant (as indicated in Item 12) are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an
admission that such directors, officers, or ten percent beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

As of February 23, 2018, there were 41,938,936 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Selected portions of the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into

Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Business
Risk Factors
Unresolved Staff Comments
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Other Information

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
10-K Summary

PART I.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

PART II.
Item 5.

Item 6.
Item 7.

Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.

Item 9A.
Item 9B.

PART III.
Item 10.
Item 11.

Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.

PART IV.
Item 15.
Item 16.

SIGNATURES

Page

3
12
16
16
16
16

17
19

21
38
39

79
79
79

80
80

80
80
80

80
83

83

2

Item 1.

Business

Overview

PART I

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential and mixed-use real estate development company. As of October 5, 2017,

we are a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton, Inc. (“D.R. Horton”). For a discussion of the terms of the
D.R. Horton merger (the“Merger”), see “Business—D.R. Horton Merger” in Part I, Item 1 of this annual report
on Form 10-K. In our core community development business we own directly or through ventures interests in
49 residential and mixed-use projects located in 11 states and 16 markets. In addition, we own interests in various
other assets that have been identified as non-core that we are divesting opportunistically over time. In 2017, we
had revenues of $114.3 million and net income of $50.3 million. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references to “we,” “us,” “our” and “Forestar” mean Forestar Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless
otherwise indicated, information is presented as of December 31, 2017, and references to acreage owned include
approximate acres owned by us and ventures regardless of our ownership interest in a venture.

For the past two years we have focused on reducing costs across our entire organization, selling non-core assets,

reducing our outstanding debt and reviewing our portfolio of assets and capital allocation to maximize shareholder
value. The merger with D.R. Horton provides us an opportunity to grow our core community development business by
establishing a strategic relationship to supply finished lots to D.R. Horton at market prices under the Master Supply
Agreement. Under the terms of the Master Supply Agreement, both companies will proactively identify land
development opportunities to expand our portfolio of assets. As our controlling shareholder, D.R. Horton has
significant influence in guiding our strategic direction and operations. As of February 23, 2018, we have acquired 13
new projects since the Merger, representing nearly 5,300 planned lots, of which approximately 35 percent are under
contract to sell to D.R. Horton and a majority of these remaining lots are also expected to be sold to D.R. Horton in
accordance with the Master Supply Agreement between the two companies.

2018 Strategic Initiatives

Our 2018 strategic initiatives include making significant investments in land acquisition and development to

expand our community development business into a diversified national platform and finalizing non-core asset
sales. On February 8, 2018, we entered into and closed on a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Starwood Land,
L.P. (“Starwood”) to sell 24 legacy projects for $232,000,000. This strategic asset sale included projects owned
both directly and indirectly through ventures and consisted of approximately 750 developed and under
development lots, over 4,000 future undeveloped lots (including all real estate associated with the Cibolo
Canyons mixed-use development), 730 unentitled acres in California, an interest in one multifamily operating
property and a multifamily development site. This sale helps to further streamline our business and provide
additional capital for future growth. We plan to invest the capital principally into new land development projects
with goals of improving returns and enhancing value for our shareholders.

Business Segments

We manage our operations through three business segments:
• Real estate,
• Mineral resources, and
• Other.

Our real estate segment provided approximately 99 percent of our 2017 consolidated revenues. We are

focused on maximizing real estate value through the entitlement and development of strategically located
residential and mixed-use communities. We secure entitlements by delivering thoughtful plans and balanced
solutions that meet the needs of communities where we operate. Residential development activities target lot
sales to local, regional and national home builders who build quality products and have strong and effective
marketing and sales programs. We invest in projects across the United States that possess key demographic and
growth characteristics that we believe make them attractive real estate investments. In 2016, we announced that
multifamily was a non-core business and we have been opportunistically divesting our multifamily assets. At
year-end 2017, a multifamily site in Austin was classified within assets held for sale and we owned interests in
two multifamily operating properties.

Our mineral resources segment, which is also non-core, provided one percent of our 2017 consolidated

revenues. In first quarter 2017, we sold all of the remaining assets for approximately $85,700,000, which
generated gains of $82,422,000 in 2017.

3

Our other segment, all of which is non-core, provided no material revenues in 2017. Historically, revenues
from this segment were generated by sales of wood fiber from our land, principally in Georgia, and leasing land
for recreational uses. At year-end 2017, we did not have any remaining timber holdings or recreational leases.
We have non-core water interests in 1.5 million acres, including a 45 percent nonparticipating royalty interest in
groundwater produced or withdrawn for commercial purposes or sold from 1.4 million acres in Texas, Louisiana,
Georgia and Alabama that were classified as assets held for sale at year-end 2017, and 20,000 acres of
groundwater leases in central Texas.

Our results of operations, including information regarding our business segments, are discussed in Item 7,

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in Item 8,
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Real Estate

In our real estate segment, we conduct project planning and management activities related to the acquisition,

entitlement, development and sale of real estate, principally residential and mixed-use communities, which we
refer to as community development. We own and manage our projects either directly or through ventures, which
we may use to achieve a variety of business objectives, including more effective capital deployment, risk
management, and leveraging a partner’s local market contacts and expertise.

At year-end 2017, we had 49 entitled, developed or under development projects in 11 states and 16 markets

planned for residential and commercial uses. We may sell land at any point when additional time required for
entitlement or investment in development will not meet our return criteria or for other strategic reasons.

A summary of our real estate projects in the entitlement process (a) classified as assets held for sale at year-

end 2017 follows:

Project

California

County

Market

Project Acres (b)

Hidden Creek Estates (c)
. . . . . . . . . . .
Terrace at Hidden Hills (c) . . . . . . . . . .

Los Angeles
Los Angeles

Los Angeles
Los Angeles

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

700
30

730

(a) A project is deemed to be in the entitlement process when customary steps necessary for the preparation of
an application for governmental land-use approvals, such as conducting pre-application meetings or similar
discussions with governmental officials, have commenced, or an application has been filed. Projects listed
may have significant steps remaining, and there is no assurance that entitlements ultimately will be received.
Project acres are approximate.
Included in the strategic asset sale to Starwood on February 8, 2018. Please read Note 22 — Subsequent
Event to our consolidated financial statements in this report for additional information regarding this
transaction.

(b)

(c)

Products

The majority of our projects are single-family residential and mixed-use communities. In some cases,
commercial land uses within a project enhance the desirability of a community by providing convenient locations
for resident support services.

We develop lots for single-family homes on sites we typically purchase in the open market. We sell
residential lots primarily to local, regional and national home builders. At year-end 2017, we had interests in 49
entitled, developed or under development projects in 11 states and 16 markets, comprised of land planned for
approximately 11,600 residential lots and units. We sold approximately 750 developed and under development
lots and over 4,000 future undeveloped lots subsequent to year-end 2017 in a strategic asset sale to Starwood.

Land designated for commercial uses is typically sold to regional and local commercial developers. We had
approximately 560 acres of entitled land designated for commercial use at year-end 2017, of which approximately
254 acres were sold subsequent to year-end 2017 in a strategic asset sale to Starwood.

4

A summary of our projects in the development process, which includes entitled, developed and under

development single-family and mixed-use projects, at year-end 2017 follows:

Project

County

Residential Lots/Units

Commercial Acres

Interest
Owned (a)

Lots/Units Sold
Since
Inception

Lots/Units
Remaining

Acres Sold
Since
Inception

Acres
Remaining

Projects with lots/units in inventory, under development or future planned development, projects with remaining
commercial acres only and projects sold out in 2017
Texas

Austin

Arrowhead Ranch (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . Hays
Hunter’s Crossing (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . Bastrop

100%
100%

Corpus Christi

Padre Island (b)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nueces

50%

Dallas-Ft. Worth

Bar C Ranch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tarrant
Lakes of Prosper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collin
Lakewood Trails . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kaufman
Lantana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Denton
Parkside . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collin
The Preserve at Pecan Creek . . . . . Denton
River’s Edge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Denton
Stoney Creek (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dallas
Summer Creek Ranch . . . . . . . . . . . Tarrant
Timber Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collin
Village Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collin

Houston

. . . . . . . . . . Montgomery

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harris

Barrington Kingwood (e) . . . . . . . . . Harris
City Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harris
Harper’s Preserve (b) (e)
Imperial Forest
Long Meadow Farms (b)
. . . . . . . . . Fort Bend
Southern Colony . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fort Bend
Southern Trails (b)
Spring Lakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harris
Summer Lakes (e)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fort Bend
Summer Park (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fort Bend
Willow Creek Farms II . . . . . . . . . . Waller / Fort

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brazoria

Bend

San Antonio

Cibolo Canyons (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bexar
Oak Creek Estates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comal
Olympia Hills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bexar
Stonewall Estates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bexar

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
88%
100%

100%
75%
50%
100%
38%
100%
80%
100%
100%
100%

90%

100%
100%
100%
100%

32
510

542

—

—

487
283
—
3,801
186
669
—
347
983
172
567

7,495

180
1,468
634
84
1,762
—
995
348
811
135

218

6,635

1,242
352
754
386

2,734

352
—

352

—

—

660
4
599
303
14
113
217
316
245
425
—

2,896

—
—
1,189
347
34
400
—
—
251
64

47

2,332

756
—
—
—

756

Total Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,406

6,336

Colorado

Denver

Buffalo Highlands (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . Weld
Cielo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Douglas
Johnstown Farms (e)
Pinery West (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Douglas
Stonebraker (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weld

. . . . . . . . . . . . Weld

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

—
—
281
86
—

367

164
343
355
—
603

1,465

5

—
66

66

—

—

—
4
—
44
—
—
—
—
79
—
5

132

—
78
76
—
237
—
1
29
58
36

—

515

108
13
10
—

131

844

—
—
2
20
—

22

19
39

58

13

13

—
—
—
—
—
7
—
—
—
—
—

7

—
83
1
—
60
—
—
—
1
65

—

210

25
—
—
—

25

313

—
—
—
104
—

104

Project

County

Florida

Palm Bay

Residential Lots/Units

Commercial Acres

Interest
Owned (a)

Lots/Units Sold
Since
Inception

Lots/Units
Remaining

Acres Sold
Since
Inception

Acres
Remaining

The Preserves at Stonebriar

. . . . . . Brevard

100%

Sarasota-Bradenton

Fox Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sarasota
Palisades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manatee

100%
100%

Total Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Georgia

Atlanta

Harris Place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paulding
Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gwinnett
Montebello (b)
Seven Hills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paulding
West Oaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cobb

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forsyth

North & South Carolina

Charlotte

Ansley Park (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lancaster
Habersham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . York
Moss Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cabarrus
Walden (e)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mecklenburg

100%
100%
90%
100%
100%

100%
100%
100%
100%

Raleigh

Beaver Creek (b) (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wake

90%

Total North & South

Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Tennessee

Nashville

Beckwith Crossing . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wilson
Morgan Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Williamson
Scales Farmstead (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Williamson
Weatherford Estates . . . . . . . . . . . . Williamson

Wisconsin

Madison

Juniper Ridge/Hawks
Woods (b) (d) (e)

Meadow Crossing II (b) (c) (e)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dane
. . . . . . Dane

Arizona, California, Utah

Tucson

Boulder Pass (b) (d) (e)
. . . . . . . . . . . . Pima
Dove Mountain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pima

Oakland

San Joaquin River . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contra Costa/

Sacramento

100%
100%
100%
100%

90%
90%

50%
100%

100%

Salt Lake City

Suncrest (b) (d) (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Salt Lake

90%

—
—

—
—
—
—

25
—
—
949
19
993

—
139
—
—
139

108
108

247

58
151
84
16
309

70
32
102

39
—
39

—
—

5
5

328
328

422
150
572
900

2
760
223
303
37
1,325

307
48
84
384
823

85
85

908

41
22
113
1
177

144
140
284

49
—
49

—
—

169
169

—
—

—
—
—
—

—
—
—
26
—
26

—
1
—
—
1

—
—

1

—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

264
264

—
—

—
—

—
—
—
—

—
—
—
113
—
113

—
5
—
—
5

—
—

5

—
—
—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

25
25

—
—

Total Arizona,

California, Utah . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

44
19,468

218
11,613

264
1,157

25
560

6

(a)

Interest owned reflects our total interest in the project, whether directly or indirectly, which may be different than our
economic interest in the project.
Projects in ventures that we account for using equity method.

(b)
(c) Venture project that develops and sells homes.
(d) Venture project that develops and sells lots and homes.
(e)

Included in the strategic asset sale to Starwood on February 8, 2018. The owned projects are classified as assets held for
sale and our equity interests in ventures continued to be classified as investment in unconsolidated ventures at year-end
2017. Please read Note 22 — Subsequent Event to our consolidated financial statements in this report for additional
information regarding this transaction.

A summary of our non-core multifamily operating properties at year-end 2017 follows:

Project

Market

Interest
Owned (a)

Type

Acres

Description

Elan 99 (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston
Denver
HiLine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

90% Multifamily
25% Multifamily

17
18

360-unit luxury apartment
385-unit luxury apartment

(a)

(b)

Interest owned reflects our total interest in the project, whether owned directly or indirectly, which may be
different than our economic interest in the project.
Included in the strategic asset sale to Starwood on February 8, 2018. Please read Note 22 — Subsequent
Event to our consolidated financial statements in this report for additional information regarding this
transaction.

Our net investment in owned and consolidated real estate projects by state at year-end 2017 follows:

State

Entitled,
Developed,
and Under
Development
Projects

Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
North and South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 61,835
25,273
21,131
7,120
5,611
4,805
1,667

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$127,442

Other Real
Estate Costs

Real Estate,
Net

Real Estate
Held for Sale

(In thousands)

$2,803
—
—
—
135
—
—

$2,938

$ 64,638
25,273
21,131
7,120
5,746
4,805
1,667

$ 93,990
—
—
22,878
8,878
27,483
27,018

$130,380

$180,247

Markets

Sales of new single-family homes in December 2017, according to a joint release by the U.S. Census Bureau

and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of
625,000 units. On a year over year basis, U.S. single family home sales were 14.1% higher than reported in
December 2016. A total of 608,000 new home sales were reported for the year, the highest annual level reported
since 2007. The number of units for sale at the end of December was 295,000, representing a supply of 5.7
months at the current sales rate. The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development jointly announced that housing starts for December 2017 registered a seasonally adjusted annual
rate of 1,192,000 units, representing an 8.2% drop from the November estimate of 1,299,000 and a 6.0%
decrease from prior year. Seasonally adjusted single-family starts in December were 836,000 units, 11.8% below
the revised November rate but 3.5% above prior year. For the year, total housing starts were up 2.4% to
1,202,100, compared to 1,173,800 for 2016, the highest annual rate since 2007. Seasonally adjusted housing
permits, generally viewed as a precursor for housing starts, registered 1,302,000 in December 2017, 0.1% below
the prior month’s revised reading but 2.8% above the December 2016 rate. Homebuilder confidence, as measured
by the National Association of Homebuilders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index, increased in December on
expectations for a stronger economy and potential regulatory relief for the business community. The monthly
reading of homebuilder sentiment rose 5 points to 74, the highest reading since 1999 and 5 points

7

higher than a year ago. On a regional basis, the three month moving averages for builders’ confidence increased in all
regions with the Midwest registering the highest increase on a percentage basis, followed by the South. The S&P
CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Index, which measures home price appreciation for the entire nation, reflected
continued price appreciation across the country. On a year over year basis, the S&P Case-Shiller U.S. National Home
Price NSA Index, which covers all nine U.S. Census divisions, reported a 6.2% annual gain in November, up from
6.1% in the previous month.

Competition

We face significant competition for the acquisition, entitlement, development and sale of real estate in our
markets. Our major competitors include other landowners who market and sell undeveloped land and numerous
national, regional and local developers, including home builders. In addition, our projects compete with other
development projects offering similar amenities, products and/or locations. Competition also exists for investment
opportunities, financing, available land, raw materials and labor, with entities that may possess greater financial,
marketing and other resources than us. The presence of competition may increase the bargaining power of property
owners seeking to sell. These competitive market pressures sometimes make it difficult to acquire, entitle, develop or
sell land at prices that meet our return criteria. Some of our real estate competitors are well established and financially
strong, may have greater financial resources than we do, or may be larger than us and/or have lower cost of capital and
operating costs than we have and expect to have.

The land acquisition and development business is highly fragmented, and we are unaware of any meaningful

concentration of market share by any one competitor. Enterprises of varying sizes, from individuals or small companies to
large corporations, actively engage in the real estate development business. Many competitors are local, privately-owned
companies. We have a few regional competitors and a few national land developer competitors in addition to national
home builders that, depending on business cycles and market conditions, may enter or exit the real estate development
business in some locations to develop lots on which they construct and sell homes. During periods when access to capital is
restricted, participants in a weaker financial condition tend to be less active.

Discontinued Operations

At year-end 2016, we had divested substantially all of our oil and gas working interest properties. As a result of

this significant change in our operations, we have reported the results of operations and financial position of these
assets as discontinued operations within our consolidated statements of income (loss) and consolidated balance sheets
for all periods presented. In addition, in second quarter 2016, we changed the name of the oil and gas segment to
mineral resources to reflect the strategic shift from oil and gas working interests to owned mineral interests.

In third quarter 2017, we sold the common stock of Forestar Petroleum Corporation for $100,000. With the
completion of this transaction we have sold all of our oil and gas working interest assets and related entities. This
transaction resulted in a significant tax loss with the corresponding tax benefit reported as discontinued operations.

Mineral Resources

In first quarter 2017, we sold our remaining owned mineral assets for approximately $85,700,000. With the

completion of this sale we have divested all of our owned mineral assets.

Other

At year-end 2017, we did not have any remaining timber holdings or recreational leases. We had water interests in

1.5 million acres which includes a 45 percent nonparticipating royalty interest in groundwater produced or withdrawn for
commercial purposes or sold from 1.4 million acres in Texas, Louisiana, Georgia and Alabama, and 20,000 acres of
groundwater leases in central Texas. Our nonparticipating royalty interests are classified as assets held for sale at year-end
2017. We have not received significant revenues or earnings from these interests.

Employees

At year-end 2017, we had 34 employees. None of our employees participate in collective bargaining

arrangements. We believe we have a good relationship with our employees.

Environmental Regulations

Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances relating to protection of
public health and the environment. Changes to laws and regulations may adversely affect our ability to develop real
estate or withdraw groundwater, or may require us to investigate and remediate contaminated properties. Additionally,
these laws may impose liability on property owners or operators for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous
or toxic substances on real property, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew, or was responsible for, the
presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The presence of, or the failure to properly remediate, such substances
may adversely affect the value of a property, as well as our ability to sell the property or to borrow funds using that
property as collateral.

8

Environmental claims generally would not be covered by our insurance programs.

In 2016, we sold all but 25 acres of a 289 acre former paper manufacturing facility near Antioch, California,
approximately 80 acres of which had not yet received a certificate of completion under the voluntary environmental
remediation program in which we were participating. The buyer of the site assumed responsibility for environmental,
remediation and monitoring activities, subject to limited exclusions, and obtained a $20,000,000, ten year pollution legal
liability insurance policy naming us as an additional insured.

D.R. Horton Merger

Merger Transaction

On June 29, 2017, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with D.R. Horton and a wholly-owned subsidiary of

D.R. Horton (“Merger Sub”). At the effective time on October 5, 2017, we merged (the “Merger”) with Merger Sub and we
continued as the surviving entity in the Merger. In the Merger, each existing share of our common stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time (the “Former Forestar Common Stock”) was converted into the right to receive, at the
election of the holders of the shares of Former Forestar Common Stock, either an amount in cash equal to $17.75 per share (the
“Cash Consideration”) or one new share of our common stock (the “New Forestar Common Stock”), subject to proration
procedures applicable to oversubscription and undersubscription for the Cash Consideration as described in the Merger agreement.
The aggregate amount of the Cash Consideration paid by D.R. Horton to holders of Former Forestar Common Stock in the Merger
was $558,256,000, and D.R. Horton funded the payment of the Cash Consideration with cash on hand. In the Merger, 10,487,873
shares of New Forestar Common Stock (representing 25% of the outstanding shares of New Forestar Common Stock immediately
after the effective time) were issued to the holders of our common stock and 31,451,063 shares of New Forestar Common Stock
(representing 75% of the outstanding shares of the New Forestar Common Stock immediately after the effective time) were issued
to D.R. Horton. As of October 5, 2017, we became a majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton and a controlled company under
New York Stock Exchange rules.

Stockholder’s Agreement

In connection with the Merger, we entered into a Stockholder’s Agreement with D.R. Horton that, among other things,

provide D.R. Horton with certain board and board committee appointment rights and certain approval rights.

Additional information regarding the Stockholder’s Agreement, including a copy of the Stockholder’s Agreement, can be

found in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2017.

Master Supply Agreement

In connection with the Merger, we entered into a Master Supply Agreement with D.R. Horton. The terms of the Master

Supply Agreement, unless earlier terminated, continue until the earlier of (a) the date that D.R. Horton and its affiliates
beneficially own less than 15% of our voting securities and (b) June 29, 2037. However, we have the right to terminate the
Master Supply Agreement at any time that D.R. Horton and its affiliates beneficially own less than 25% of our voting securities.

Under the Master Supply Agreement, we will present to D.R. Horton all single-family residential lot development
opportunities (subject to certain exceptions) that we desire to acquire and develop that have been approved or conditionally
approved by the Forestar Investment Committee (a “Forestar Sourced Opportunity”); and D.R. Horton has the right, but not
the obligation, to present us with lot development opportunities that D.R. Horton desires to acquire for development (if
presented to us, a “D.R. Horton Sourced Opportunity”).

We and D.R. Horton will collaborate regarding all Forestar Sourced Opportunities and all D.R. Horton Sourced Opportunities,

after considering current and future market conditions and dynamics. If we and D.R. Horton agree to pursue a Forestar Sourced
Opportunity or a D.R. Horton Sourced Opportunity, such agreement will be evidenced by a mutually agreed upon written
development plan prepared at the direction of the Forestar Investment Committee (a “Development Plan”), addressing, among
other things, the number, size, layout and projected price of lots, phasing, timing, amenities and entitlements, and are referred to as
either a “Forestar Sourced Development” or a “D.R. Horton Sourced Development”, as the case may be.

D.R. Horton or its affiliates have (a) a right of first offer (“ROFO”) to buy up to 50% of the lots in the first phase (and in
any subsequent phase in which D.R. Horton purchased at least 25% of the lots in the previous phase) in each Forestar Sourced
Development; and (b) the right to purchase up to 100% of the lots in each D.R. Horton Sourced Development, at the then
current fair market price and terms per lot, as mutually agreed to by us and D.R. Horton. All lots in a Forestar Sourced
Development in which a D.R. Horton affiliate participates as a buyer will be equitably allocated among D.R. Horton and any
other builders in each phase taking into consideration the location, size and other attributes associated with the lots. The
agreement evidencing the ROFO for the lots in the Forestar Sourced Development (the “ROFO Agreement”), and the
purchase and sale agreement for the lots in the D.R. Horton Sourced Development (the “PSA”), will be negotiated, finalized
and executed as a part of the Development Plan, and in all events the Development Plan will be finalized, and the ROFO
Agreement will be negotiated, finalized and executed, prior to the expiration of the feasibility period in any contract to acquire
a Forestar Sourced Development. D.R. Horton will assign to us on an “as-is”, “where-is basis” the contract to acquire a

9

D.R. Horton Sourced Development after the finalization of the Development Plan and PSA for such D.R. Horton
Sourced Development.

Additional information regarding the Master Supply Agreement, including a copy of the Master Supply

Agreement, can be found in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2017.

Shared Services Agreement

On October 6, 2017, we entered into a Shared Services Agreement with D.R. Horton pursuant to which D.R.

Horton will provide us certain administrative, compliance, operational and procurement services. Additional
information regarding the Shared Services Agreement, including a copy of the Shared Services Agreement, can
be found in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 10, 2017.

Available Information

Forestar Group Inc. is a Delaware corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 10700 Pecan

Park Blvd., Suite 150, Austin, Texas 78750. Our telephone number is (512) 433-5200.

From our Internet website, http://www.forestargroup.com, you may obtain additional information about us

including:

•

•

•

our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
other documents as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with SEC;
beneficial ownership reports filed by officers, directors, and principal security holders under
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or the “Exchange Act”); and
corporate governance information that includes our:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

corporate governance guidelines,
audit committee charter
compensation committee charter,
nominating and governance committee charter,
standards of business conduct and ethics,
code of ethics for senior financial officers, and
information on how to communicate directly with our board of directors.

We will also provide printed copies of any of these documents to any stockholder free of charge upon
request. In addition, the materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information about the operation of the Public Reference
Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site
(http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that is filed
electronically with the SEC.

Executive Officers

The names, ages and titles of our executive officers are:

Name

Age

Position

Donald J. Tomnitz . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Daniel C. Bartok . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charles D. Jehl

69 Executive Chairman of the Board
61 Chief Executive Officer
49 Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Donald J. Tomnitz has served as our Executive Chairman of the Board since October 2017 and was
appointed in connection with the Merger with D.R. Horton. Prior to joining Forestar, Mr. Tomnitz served as a
consultant to D.R. Horton from October 2014 to September 2017. From November 1998 to September 2014,
Mr. Tomnitz was the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of D.R. Horton. From 1996 until 1998,
Mr. Tomnitz was President of D.R. Horton’s Homebuilding Division. In 1998, he was elected an Executive Vice
President of D.R. Horton and in 2000, he became President of D.R. Horton as well. Before joining D.R. Horton,
Mr. Tomnitz was a Captain in the U.S. Army, a Vice President of RepublicBank of Dallas, N.A., and a Vice
President of Crow Development Company, a Trammell Crow Company. Mr. Tomnitz holds a Bachelor of Arts
Degree in Economics from Westminster College and a Masters of Business Administration in Finance from
Western Illinois University

Daniel C. Bartok has served as our Chief Executive Officer since December 2017. Prior to joining Forestar,

he served as Executive Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank as head of its Owned Real Estate Group from 2008
to 2017. Prior to joining Wells Fargo, he was President of Clarion Realty, Inc. a real estate development
company operating across multiple states, with an emphasis on residential land development and homebuilding.

10

Mr. Bartok holds a Bachelor of Sciences degree in Accountancy from the University of Illinois and began his
career at Price Waterhouse.

Charles D. Jehl has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since September 2015. He
previously served as our Executive Vice President — Oil and Gas from February 2015 to September 2015, as
Executive Vice President — Oil and Gas Business Administration from June 2013 to February 2015, and as
Chief Accounting Officer from 2006 to June 2013. Mr. Jehl served as Chief Operations Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Guaranty Insurance Services, Inc. from 2005 to 2006, and as Senior Vice President and
Controller from 2000 to 2005. From 1989 to 1999, Mr. Jehl held various financial management positions within
Temple-Inland’s financial services segment. Mr. Jehl holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Accounting from
Concordia Lutheran College and is also a Certified Public Accountant.

11

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risks Related to our Concentrated Ownership

So long as D.R. Horton controls us, our other stockholders will have limited ability to influence matters

requiring stockholder approval, and D.R. Horton’s interest may conflict with the interests of our other stockholders.
D.R. Horton beneficially owns approximately 75% of our common stock. As a result, until such time as D.R.
Horton and its controlled affiliates hold shares representing less than a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by our
stockholders at a stockholder meeting, D.R. Horton generally has the ability to control the outcome of any matter
submitted for the vote of our stockholders, except in certain circumstances set forth in the our certificate of
incorporation or bylaws. In addition, under the terms of our certificate of incorporation and the Stockholder’s
Agreement with D.R. Horton, so long as D.R. Horton or its affiliates own 35% or more of our voting securities, we
may not take certain actions without D.R. Horton’s approval, including certain actions with respect to equity issuances,
indebtedness, acquisitions and executive hiring, termination and compensation.

In addition, pursuant to the Stockholder’s Agreement with D.R. Horton, we are subject to certain requirements and

limitations regarding the composition of our Board. However, many of those requirements and limitations expire in
January 2019. Thereafter, for so long as D.R. Horton and its controlled affiliates hold shares of our common stock
representing at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by our stockholders at a stockholder meeting, D.R.
Horton is able to nominate and elect all the members of our Board, subject to a requirement that we and D.R. Horton
use reasonable best efforts to cause at least three directors to qualify as “independent directors,” as such term is defined
in the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing rules, and applicable law. The directors elected by D.R. Horton
have the authority to make decisions affecting our capital structure, including the issuance of additional capital stock or
options, the incurrence of additional indebtedness, the implementation of stock repurchase programs and the
declaration of dividends.

The interests of D.R. Horton may not coincide with the interests of our other stockholders. D.R. Horton’s ability,

subject to the limitations in the Stockholder’s Agreement and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, to control
matters submitted to our stockholders for approval limits the ability of other stockholders to influence corporate
matters, which may cause us to take actions that our other stockholders do not view as beneficial to them. In such
circumstances, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected. In addition, the existence of a
controlling stockholder may have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, or may
discourage a third party from seeking to acquire us. A third party would be required to negotiate any such transaction
with D.R. Horton, and the interests of D.R. Horton with respect to such transaction may be different from the interests
of our other stockholders.

Subject to limitations in the Stockholder’s Agreement and our certificate of incorporation that limit D.R. Horton’s

ability to take advantage of certain corporate opportunities, D.R. Horton is not restricted from competing with us or
otherwise taking for itself or its other affiliates certain corporate opportunities that may be attractive to us.

Any inability to resolve favorably any disputes that may arise between us and D.R. Horton may result in a

significant reduction of our revenues and earnings.

Disputes may arise between D.R. Horton and us in a number of areas, including:
•
•
•
•
•

business combinations involving us;
sales or dispositions by D.R. Horton of all or any portion of its ownership interest in us;
performance under the Master Supply Agreement between D.R. Horton and us;
arrangements with third parties that are exclusionary to D.R. Horton or us; and
business opportunities that may be attractive to both D.R. Horton and us.

We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and even if we do, the resolution may be less favorable than

if we were dealing with an unaffiliated party.

New agreements may be entered into between us and D.R. Horton, and agreements we enter into with D.R. Horton
may be amended upon agreement between the parties. Because we are controlled by D.R. Horton, we may not have the
leverage to negotiate these agreements, or amendments thereto if required, on terms as favorable to us as those that we
would negotiate with an unaffiliated third party.

D.R. Horton’s ability to control our Board may make it difficult for us to recruit independent directors.
So long as D.R. Horton and its controlled affiliates hold shares of our common stock representing at least a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast by our stockholders at a stockholders’ meeting, D.R. Horton is able to elect all
of the members of our Board, subject to the requirement to nominate one individual from the pre-merger Board at our
2018 annual meeting of stockholders. Further, the interests of D.R. Horton and our other stockholders may diverge.
Under these circumstances, persons who might otherwise accept an invitation to join our Board may decline.

12

We qualify as a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE rules and, as a result, may elect to rely

on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to stockholders of
companies that are not “controlled companies.”

So long as D.R. Horton owns more than 50% of the total voting power of our common stock, we qualify as a
“controlled company” under the NYSE corporate governance standards. As a controlled company, we may under the
NYSE rules elect to be exempt from obligations to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements,
including the requirements:

•
•

•

•

that a majority of our Board consist of independent directors;
that we have a nominating and governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with
a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities;
that we have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written
charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and
that an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and governance committee and compensation
committee be performed.

We have not elected to utilize the “controlled company” exemptions at this time. However, if we elect to use the

“controlled company” exemptions, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of
companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

We may not realize potential benefits of the strategic relationship with D.R. Horton, including the transactions

contemplated by the Master Supply Agreement with D.R. Horton.

The Master Supply Agreement establishes a strategic relationship between us and D.R. Horton for the supply of

developed lots. Under the Master Supply Agreement, we will, and D.R. Horton may, present lot development
opportunities that it desires to develop to the other party, subject to certain exceptions. The parties may collaborate with
respect to such opportunities and, if they elect to develop such opportunities, D.R. Horton has a right of first offer or
right to purchase some or all of the lots developed by us, as set forth in the Master Supply Agreement, on market terms
as determined by the parties. There are numerous uncertainties associated with our relationship with D.R. Horton,
including the risk that the parties will be unable to negotiate mutually acceptable terms for lot development
opportunities and the fact that D.R. Horton is not obligated to present its lot development opportunities to us. As a
result, we may not realize potential growth or other benefits from the strategic relationship with D.R. Horton, which
may affect our financial condition or results of operations.

D.R. Horton’s control of us or the strategic relationship between D.R. Horton and us may negatively affect our

business relationships with other builder customers.

So long as D.R. Horton controls us or the strategic relationship between D.R. Horton and us remains in place, our

business relationships with other builder customers may be negatively affected, including as a result of the risk that
such other builder customers may believe that we will favor D.R. Horton over our other customers. In addition, we
have in the past relied on builder referrals as a source for land development opportunities, and there is a risk that
builders may refer such opportunities to land developers other than us as a result of our close alignment with D.R.
Horton.

Risks Related to our Operations

Reduced demand for new housing or commercial tracts in the markets where we operate could adversely

impact our profitability.

The residential development industry is cyclical and is significantly affected by changes in general and local
economic conditions, such as employment levels, availability of financing for home buyers, interest rates, consumer
confidence and housing demand. Adverse changes in these conditions generally, or in the markets where we operate,
could decrease demand for lots for new homes in these areas. Decline in housing demand could negatively affect our real
estate development activities, which could result in a decrease in our revenues and earnings.

Furthermore, the market value of undeveloped land and lots held by us, including commercial tracts, can fluctuate
significantly as a result of changing economic and real estate market conditions. If there are significant adverse changes in
economic or real estate market conditions, we may have to hold land in inventory longer than planned. Inventory carrying
costs can be significant and can result in losses or lower returns and adversely affect our liquidity.

Our business is cyclical in nature.
Real estate development of residential lots is influenced by new home construction activity, which can be volatile.

Cyclical downturns may materially and adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of
operations. Our operations are also impacted by general and local economic conditions, including employment levels,
consumer confidence and spending, housing demand, availability of financing for homebuyers, tax policy for
deductibility of home mortgage interest and property taxes, and interest rate and demographic trends.

13

Adverse changes in these general and local economic conditions or deterioration in the broader economy would
cause a negative impact on our business and financial results and increase the risk for asset impairments and write-offs.
Changes in these economic conditions may affect some of our regions or markets more than others. If adverse
conditions affect our larger markets, particularly Texas, they could have a proportionately greater impact on us than on
some other real estate development companies.

The real estate development industry is highly competitive and a number of entities with which we compete are

larger and have greater resources, and competitive conditions may adversely affect our results of operations.

The real estate development industry in which we operate is highly competitive.

Competitive conditions in the real estate development industry may result in difficulties acquiring suitable land at

acceptable prices, lower sales volumes and prices, increased development or construction costs and delays in
construction. We compete with numerous regional and local developers for the acquisition, entitlement, and
development of land suitable for development. We also compete with national, regional and local home builders who
develop real estate for their own use in homebuilding operations, many of which are larger and have greater resources
than we do. Any improvement in the cost structure or service of our competitors will increase the competition we face.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected by any of these factors.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more debt.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. If new debt is
added to our and our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face could intensify.

We may have continuing liabilities relating to non-core assets that have been sold, which could adversely

impact our results of operations.

In the course of selling our non-core assets we are typically required to make contractual representations and
warranties and to provide contractual indemnities to the buyers. These contractual obligations typically survive the
closing of the transactions for some period of time. If a buyer is successful in sustaining a claim against us we may
incur additional expenses pertaining to an asset we no longer own, and we may also be obligated to defend and/or
indemnify the buyer from certain third party claims. Such obligations could be material and they could adversely
impact our results of operations.

The market price of and trading volume of our shares of common stock may be volatile.
The market price of our shares of common stock has fluctuated substantially and may continue to fluctuate in

response to many factors which are beyond our control, including:

•

•

•

•

fluctuations in our operating results, including results that vary from expectations of management, analysts
and investors;
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions, financings and other material events by us or our
competitors;
the sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock held by existing security holders in the public
market; and
general conditions in the real estate industry.

The stock markets in general may experience extreme volatility that may be unrelated to the operating

performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our
common stock, make it difficult to predict the market price of our common stock in the future and cause the value of
our common stock to decline.

Provisions of Delaware law, our charter documents and the indentures governing our 3.75% convertible senior

notes may impede or discourage a takeover, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to

the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change in control would be beneficial to our existing
stockholders. Our board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to designate the terms of one or
more series of preferred stock and issue shares of preferred stock. These and other impediments to third party acquisition
or change of control could limit the price investors are willing to pay for shares of our common stock, which could in
turn reduce the market price of our common stock. In addition, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change under the
terms of the convertible senior notes, certain repurchase rights and early settlement rights would be triggered under the
indentures governing our convertible senior notes. In such event, the increase of the conversion or early settlement rate,
as applicable, in connection with certain make-whole fundamental change transactions under the terms of our convertible
senior notes could discourage a potential acquirer.

14

Our activities are subject to environmental regulations and liabilities that could have a negative effect on our

operating results.

Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations related to the protection of the

environment. Compliance with these provisions or the promulgation of new environmental laws and regulations may
result in delays, may cause us to invest substantial funds to ensure compliance with applicable environmental
regulations and can prohibit or severely restrict real estate development activity in environmentally sensitive regions or
areas.

Our business may suffer if we lose key personnel.

We depend to a large extent on the services of certain key management personnel. These individuals have
extensive experience and expertise in our business. The loss of any of these individuals could have a material adverse
effect on our operations. We do not maintain key-man life insurance with respect to any of our employees. Our success
may be dependent on our ability to continue to employ and retain skilled personnel.

Development of real estate entails a lengthy, uncertain and costly entitlement process.

Approval to develop real property entails an extensive entitlement process involving multiple and overlapping
regulatory jurisdictions and often requiring discretionary actions by local governments. This process is often political,
uncertain and may require significant exactions in order to secure approvals. Real estate projects must generally
comply with local land development regulations and may need to comply with state and federal regulations. The
process to comply with these regulations is usually lengthy and costly, may not result in the approvals we seek, and can
be expected to materially affect our real estate development activities, which may adversely affect our business,
liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Our real estate development operations are currently concentrated in the major markets of Texas, and as a result,

our financial results may be significantly influenced by the Texas economy.

The economic growth and strength of Texas, where the majority of our real estate development activity is located,
are important factors in sustaining demand for our real estate development activities. A significant decline in oil prices
may impact job growth and housing demand in Texas, particularly in Houston, where the energy industry has a
significant concentration. As a result, any adverse impact to the economic growth and health, or infrastructure
development, of Texas could materially adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of
operations.

Our real estate development operations are highly dependent upon national, regional and local home builders.

We are highly dependent upon our relationships with national, regional, and local home builders to purchase lots

in our residential developments. If home builders do not view our developments as desirable locations for
homebuilding operations, or if home builders are limited in their ability to conduct operations due to economic
conditions, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.

In addition, we enter into contracts to sell lots to home builders. A home builder could decide to delay purchases

of lots in one or more of our developments due to adverse real estate conditions wholly unrelated to our areas of
operations, such as the corporate decisions regarding allocation of limited capital or human resources. As a result, we
may sell fewer lots and may have lower sales revenues, which could have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity,
financial condition and results of operations.

Our strategic partners may have interests that differ from ours and may take actions that adversely affect us.
We may enter into strategic alliances or venture relationships as part of our overall strategy for particular

developments or regions. While these partners may bring development experience, industry expertise, financing
capabilities, local credibility or other competitive attributes, they may also have economic or business interests or goals
that are inconsistent with ours or that are influenced by factors unrelated to our business. We may also be subject to
adverse business consequences if the market reputation or financial condition of a partner deteriorates, or if a partner
takes actions inconsistent with our interest.

When we enter into a venture, we may rely on our venture partner to fund its share of capital commitments to the
venture and to otherwise fulfill its operating and financial obligations. Failure of a venture partner to timely satisfy its
funding or other obligations to the venture could require us to elect whether to increase our financial or other operating
support of the venture in order to preserve our investment, which may reduce our returns or cause us to incur losses, or
to not fund such obligations, which may subject the venture and us to adverse consequences or increase our financial
exposure in the project.

Debt within some of our ventures may not be renewed or may be difficult or more expensive to replace.

As of December 31, 2017, our unconsolidated ventures had approximately $85.2 million of debt, of which $80.6
million was non-recourse to us. When debt within our ventures matures, some of our ventures may be unable to renew
existing loans or secure replacement financing, or replacement financing may be more expensive. If our ventures are

15

unable to renew existing loans or secure replacement financing, we may be required to contribute additional equity or
elect to loan or contribute funds to our ventures, which could increase our risk. If our ventures secure replacement
financing that is more expensive, our profits may be reduced.

Delays or failures by governmental authorities to take expected actions could reduce our returns or cause

us to incur losses on certain real estate development projects.

For certain projects, we rely on governmental districts to issue bonds to reimburse us for qualified expenses,

such as road and utility infrastructure costs. Bonds must be supported by district tax revenues, usually from ad
valorem taxes. Slowing new home sales, decreasing real estate prices or difficult credit markets for bond sales
can reduce or delay district bond sale revenues, causing such districts to delay reimbursement of our qualified
expenses. Failure to receive timely reimbursement for qualified expenses could adversely affect our cash flows
and reduce our returns or cause us to incur losses on certain real estate development projects.

Failure to succeed in new markets may limit our growth.

We may from time to time commence development activity or make acquisitions outside of our existing
market areas if appropriate opportunities arise. Our historical experience in existing markets does not ensure that
we will be able to operate successfully in new markets. We may be exposed to a variety of risks if we choose to
enter new markets, including, among others:

•

•

•

•

•

an inability to accurately evaluate local housing market conditions and local economies;

an inability to obtain land for development or to identify appropriate acquisition opportunities;

an inability to hire and retain key personnel;

an inability to successfully integrate operations; and

lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.

Properties.

Our principal executive offices are leased and are located in Austin, Texas. We also lease office space in
Atlanta, Georgia; Dallas, Texas; and Houston, Texas. We believe these offices are suitable for conducting our
business.

For a description of our properties in our real estate, mineral resources and other segments, see “Business —

Real Estate”, “Business — Mineral Resources” and “Business — Other”, respectively, in Part I, Item 1 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

We are involved directly or through ventures in various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the
ordinary course of doing business. We believe we have established adequate reserves for any probable losses and
that the outcome of any of the proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or
long-term results of operations or cash flows. It is possible, however, that charges related to these matters could
be significant to results of operations or cash flow in any single accounting period.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

16

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of

Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The high and low sales prices in each

quarter in 2017 and 2016 were:

2017

2016

Price Range

Price Range

High

Low

High

Low

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Quarter
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
For the Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$13.75
$17.65
$17.40
$22.50
$22.50

$12.50
$13.85
$16.95
$16.35
$12.50

$13.04
$13.74
$12.80
$13.65
$13.74

$ 8.40
$11.23
$11.33
$10.75
$ 8.40

Shareholders

Our stock transfer records indicated that as of February 23, 2018, there were approximately 1,963 holders of

record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

We currently intend to retain any future earnings to support our business. The declaration and payment of
any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors after taking into account various factors,
including without limitation, our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements of our business, the terms of
any credit agreements or indentures to which we may be a party at the time, legal requirements, industry practice,
and other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities (a)

Period

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

Average
Price Paid
per Share

Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plan or
Programs

Maximum
Number of
Shares That
May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs

Month 10 (10/1/2017 — 10/31/2017) . . . . . . .
Month 11 (11/1/2017 — 11/30/2017) . . . . . . .
Month 12 (12/1/2017 — 12/31/2017) . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
—

—

$
$
$

$

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

(a) On February 11, 2009, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to

7,000,000 shares of our common stock. We have purchased 3,777,308 shares under this authorization,
which terminated upon closing of the Merger with D.R. Horton on October 5, 2017.

17

Performance Graph

Our old peer group consists of a combination of real estate and oil and gas companies: Alexander &
Baldwin, Inc., AV Homes Inc., Approach Resources, Inc., Cousins Properties Incorporated, Contango Oil and
Gas Co., Goodrich Petroleum Corp., Matador Resources Co., Petroquest Energy Inc., Post Properties, Inc.,
Potlatch Corporation, PS Business Parks, Inc., Resolute Energy Corp. and The St. Joe Company.

Because we are no longer in the oil and gas business, we constructed a new peer group consisting only of

real estate companies: The St. Joe Company, Tejon Ranch Co, Consolidated-Tomoka Land Co., Five Points
Holding, LLC (Class A), HomeFed Corporation, and Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100

$220

$200

$180

$160

$140

$120

$100

$80

$60

$40

$20

$0

12/31/2012

12/31/2013

12/31/2014

12/31/2015

12/31/2016

12/31/2017

Forestar Group Inc.

Russell 2000 Index

New Peer Group

Old Peer Group

Pursuant to SEC rules, returns of each of the companies in the Peer Index are weighted according to the
respective company’s stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated.

18

68,454
14,815
6,507

89,776

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

Revenues:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

(In thousands, except per share amount)

Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $112,746 $190,273 $ 202,830 $ 213,112 $ 248,011
21,419
Mineral resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10,721
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,690
9,362

1,502
74

9,094
6,652

5,076
1,965

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $114,322 $197,314 $ 218,576 $ 238,164 $ 280,151

Segment earnings (loss):

Real estate (a)
Mineral resources (b)
Other (c)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 47,281 $121,420 $ 67,678 $

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

45,552
(6,393)

3,327
(4,625)

4,230
(608)

96,906 $
9,116
5,499

Total segment earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Items not allocated to segments:

General and administrative expense (d)
Share-based and long-term incentive compensation

. . . . . . . . . . .

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of assets (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net (f)
Other corporate non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from continuing operations before taxes

86,440

120,122

71,300

111,521

(50,354)

(18,274)

(24,802)

(21,229)

(20,597)

(7,201)
28,674
(8,532)
(611)
1,627

(4,425)
48,891
(19,985)
(35,864)
350

(4,474)
—
(34,066)
—
256

(3,417)
—
(30,286)
—
453

(16,809)
—
(20,004)
—
119

attributable to Forestar Group, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,043
(45,820)

90,815
(15,302)

8,214
(35,131)

57,042
(20,850)

32,485
(5,780)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

to Forestar Group Inc.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

4,223

75,513

(26,917)

36,192

26,705

(h)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,031

(16,865)

(186,130)

(19,609)

2,616

Net income (loss) attributable to Forestar Group Inc. . . . . $ 50,254 $ 58,648 $(213,047) $

16,583 $

29,321

Net income (loss) per diluted share:
Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

0.10 $
1.09 $

1.78 $
(0.40) $

(0.79) $
(5.43) $

Net income (loss) per diluted share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $

1.19 $

1.38 $

(6.22) $

0.83 $
(0.45) $

0.38 $

0.73
0.07

0.80

Average diluted shares outstanding (i) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At year-end:

42,381

42,334

34,266

43,596

36,813

Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $761,912 $733,208 $ 972,246 $1,247,606 $1,168,027
353,282
Debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest
5,552
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forestar Group Inc. shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . .
709,845
Ratio of total debt to total capitalization . . . . . . . . . .

422,151
2,540
707,202

381,515
2,515
501,600

108,429
1,420
604,212

110,358
1,467
560,651

37%

15%

43%

16%

33%

(a) Real estate segment earnings includes gain on sale of assets of $1,915,000 in 2017, $117,856,000 in 2016,

$1,585,000 in 2015 and $25,981,000 in 2014. Segment earnings also includes non-cash impairments of $3,420,000
in 2017, $56,453,000 in 2016, $1,044,000 in 2015, $399,000 in 2014 and $1,790,000 in 2013. Real estate segment
earnings also include the effects of net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.

(b) Mineral resources segment earnings in 2017 includes gain on sale of assets of $82,422,000 related to the sale of all

our remaining owned mineral assets. Segment earnings also includes a non-cash impairment charge of
$37,900,000 related to the mineral resources reporting unit goodwill.

(c) Other segment earnings (loss) includes non-cash impairment charges of $5,852,000 in 2017 and $3,874,000 in

(d)

2016 primarily related to our central Texas water assets.
In 2017, general and administrative expense includes merger related transaction costs of $37,216,000 which
includes a merger termination fee of $20,000,000 paid to Starwood Capital Group, $11,787,000 in professional
fees and other costs, and $5,429,000 in executive severance and change in control costs.

19

(e) Gain on sale of assets in 2017 and 2016 represents gains in accordance with our key initiatives to divest non-core

(f)

(g)

(h)

timberland and undeveloped land.
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net is related to retirement of $5,315,000 of our 8.50% Senior Secured Notes due
2022 and $1,077,000 of our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 in 2017 and $225,245,000 of our 8.50%
Senior Secured Notes and $5,000,000 of our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes in 2016.
In 2017, income tax expense was impacted by non-deductible merger transaction costs and goodwill impairment.
In 2015, income tax expense from continuing and discontinued operations includes an expense of $97,068,000 for
a valuation allowance on a portion of our deferred tax asset that was determined to be more likely than not to be
unrealizable. In 2013, income tax expense includes a benefit from recognition of $6,326,000 of previously
unrecognized tax benefits upon lapse of the statute of limitations for a previously reserved tax position.
Income (loss) from discontinued operations includes an income tax benefit of $46,039,000 in 2017 and non-cash
impairment charges of $612,000 in 2016, $163,029,000 in 2015, $32,665,000 in 2014 and $473,000 in 2013
related to non-core oil and gas working interests. Income (loss) from discontinued operations also includes losses
of $13,664,000 in 2016 and $706,000 in 2015 and gains of $8,526,000 in 2014 associated with sale of working
interest oil and gas properties.

(i) Our 2015 weighted average diluted shares outstanding excludes dilutive effect of equity awards and 7,857,000
shares issuable upon settlement of the prepaid stock purchase contract component of our 6.00% tangible equity
units, due to our net loss attributable to Forestar Group Inc.

20

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other materials we have filed or may file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws.
These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “believe,” “anticipate,”
“could,” “estimate,” “likely,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “expect,” and similar expressions, including references to
assumptions. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risk and
uncertainties. We note that a variety of factors and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ
significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors and uncertainties that might
cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

•

•
•
•
•
•

•

•

•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•

•

general economic, market or business conditions in Texas, where our real estate activities are
concentrated, or on a national or global scale;
our ability to achieve our 2018 strategic initiatives;
the opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented to us and that we may pursue;
our ability to hire and retain key personnel;
future development approvals and the ability to obtain such approvals;
obtaining approvals of reimbursements and other payments from special improvement districts and
timing of such payments;
accuracy of estimates and other assumptions related to investment in and development of real estate,
the expected timing and pricing of land and lot sales and related cost of real estate sales, impairment of
long-lived assets, income taxes, share-based compensation;
the levels of resale housing inventory in our mixed-use development projects and the regions in which
they are located;
fluctuations in costs and expenses, including impacts from shortages in materials or labor;
demand for new housing, which can be affected by a number of factors including the availability of
mortgage credit, job growth, and fluctuations in commodity prices;
competitive actions by other companies;
changes in governmental policies, laws or regulations and actions or restrictions of regulatory agencies;
our partners’ ability to fund their capital commitments and otherwise fulfill their operating and
financial obligations;
the effect of D.R. Horton’s controlling level of ownership on us and our stockholders;
our ability to realize the potential benefits of the strategic relationship with D.R. Horton;
the effect of our strategic relationship with D.R. Horton on our ability to maintain relationships with
our vendors and customers; and
the final resolutions or outcomes with respect to our contingent and other liabilities related to our
business.

Other factors, including the risk factors described in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, may also

cause actual results to differ materially from those projected by our forward-looking statements. New factors
emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all such factors, nor can we assess the impact of
any such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and, except as
required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to
any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Our Operations

We are a residential and mixed-use real estate development company. As of October 5, 2017, we are a

majority-owned subsidiary of D.R. Horton. In our core community development business we own directly or
through ventures interests in 49 residential and mixed-use projects located in 11 states and 16 markets. In
addition, we own interests in various other assets that have been identified as non-core that we are divesting
opportunistically over time.

21

For the past two years we have focused on reducing costs across our entire organization, selling non-core assets,

reducing our outstanding debt and reviewing our portfolio of assets and capital allocation to maximize shareholder
value. The merger with D.R. Horton provides us an opportunity to grow our core community development business by
establishing a strategic relationship to supply finished lots to D. R. Horton at market prices under the Master Supply
Agreement. Under the terms of the Master Supply Agreement, both companies will proactively identify land
development opportunities to expand our portfolio of assets. As our controlling shareholder, D.R. Horton has
significant influence in guiding our strategic direction and operations. As of February 23, 2018, we have acquired 13
new projects since the Merger representing nearly 5,300 planned lots, of which approximately 35 percent are under
contract to sell to D.R. Horton and a majority of these remaining lots are also expected to be sold to D.R. Horton in
accordance with the Master Supply Agreement between the two companies.

2018 Strategic Initiatives

Our 2018 strategic initiatives include making significant investments in land acquisition and development to

expand our community development business into a diversified national platform and finalizing non-core asset
sales. On February 8, 2018, we entered into and closed on a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Starwood to sell
24 legacy projects for $232,000,000. This strategic asset sale included projects owned both directly and indirectly
through ventures and consisted of approximately 750 developed and under development lots, over 4,000 future
undeveloped lots (including all real estate associated with the Cibolo Canyons mixed-use development), 730
unentitled acres in California, an interest in one multifamily operating property and a multifamily development
site. This sale helps to further streamline our business and provide additional capital for future growth. We plan
to invest the capital principally into new land development projects with goals of improving returns and
enhancing value for our shareholders.

Discontinued Operations

At year-end 2016, we had divested substantially all of our oil and gas working interest properties. As a

result of this significant change in our operations, we have reported the results of operations and financial
position of these assets as discontinued operations within our consolidated statements of income (loss) and
consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented. In addition, in second quarter 2016, we changed the name
of the oil and gas segment to mineral resources to reflect the strategic shift from oil and gas working interests to
owned mineral interests.

In third quarter 2017, we sold the common stock of Forestar Petroleum Corporation for $100,000. With the
completion of this transaction we have sold all of our oil and gas working interest assets and related entities. This
transaction resulted in a significant tax loss with the corresponding tax benefit reported as discontinued
operations.

Business Segments

We manage our operations through three business segments:

• Real estate,

• Mineral resources, and

• Other.

We evaluate performance based on segment earnings (loss) before unallocated items and income taxes.
Segment earnings (loss) consist of operating income (loss), equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures, gain
on sale of assets, interest income on loans secured by real estate and net (income) loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests. Items not allocated to our business segments consist of general and administrative
expenses, share-based and long-term compensation, gain on sale of strategic timberland and undeveloped land,
interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and other corporate non-operating income and expense. The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the accounting policy note to the
consolidated financial statements.

22

Results of Operations for the Years Ended 2017, 2016 and 2015

A summary of our consolidated results by business segment follows:

2017

For the Year

2016
(In thousands)

2015

Revenues:

Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mineral resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$112,746
1,502
74
$114,322

$190,273
5,076
1,965
$197,314

$202,830
9,094
6,652
$218,576

Segment earnings (loss):

Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mineral resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total segment earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Items not allocated to segments:

$ 47,281
45,552
(6,393)
86,440

$121,420
3,327
(4,625)
120,122

$ 67,678
4,230
(608)
71,300

General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based and long-term incentive compensation expense . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
Other corporate non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(50,354)
(7,201)
28,674
(8,532)
(611)
1,627

(18,274)
(4,425)
48,891
(19,985)
(35,864)
350

(24,802)
(4,474)
—
(34,066)
—
256

Income from continuing operations before taxes attributable to Forestar

Group Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,043
(45,820)

90,815
(15,302)

8,214
(35,131)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Forestar Group

Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

4,223

$ 75,513

$ (26,917)

Significant aspects of our results of operations follow:
2017
• Real estate segment earnings in 2017 decreased as compared to 2016 primarily due to gains of
$117,856,000 from the sale of non-core assets in 2016 which were partially offset by non-cash
impairment charges of $56,453,000. In addition, 2016 included $28,098,000 in earnings from retail
sales of undeveloped land and we had no retail sales of undeveloped land in 2017. Segment earnings in
2017 reflect higher equity in earnings from unconsolidated ventures primarily due to higher
commercial sales activity from our ventures and a gain of $7,783,000 from the sale of the Acklen
multifamily project from a venture in which we own a 30% interest.

• Mineral resources segment earnings increased due to the sale of our remaining owned mineral assets for

approximately $85,700,000, which generated $82,422,000 in gains. These gains were partially offset by a
non-cash impairment charge of $37,900,000 related to the mineral resources reporting unit goodwill.

• Other segment earnings (loss) includes non-cash impairment charges of $5,852,000 in 2017 and

$3,874,000 in 2016 primarily related to our central Texas water assets.

• General and administrative expense increased primarily due to merger-related transaction costs of

•

$37,216,000 which includes a merger termination fee of $20,000,000 paid to Starwood Capital Group,
$11,787,000 in professional fees and other costs, and $5,429,000 in executive severance and change in
control costs.
Share-based and long-term incentive compensation expense increased by $4,349,000 due to the
acceleration of vesting and settlement of outstanding equity awards upon closing of the Merger.
• Gain on sale of assets of $28,674,000 represents the sale of approximately 19,000 acres of timberland
and undeveloped land in Georgia and Texas for $46,197,000 in accordance with our key initiative to
divest non-core assets.
Income tax expense from continuing operations in 2017 includes the impact of non-deductible goodwill
impairment and transaction costs related to the Merger.

•

23

2016
• Real estate segment earnings benefited from combined gains of $117,856,000 which generated
combined net proceeds before debt repayment of $247,506,000 as a result of executing our key
initiative to opportunistically divest non-core assets. These gains were partially offset by non-cash
impairment charges of $56,453,000 related to six non-core community development projects and two
multifamily sites. In addition, earnings benefited from increased residential lot sales activity and higher
retail sales of undeveloped land.

• Mineral resources segment earnings decreased due to lower oil and gas prices and production volumes
associated with royalty interests and reduced lease bonus and delay rental payments received from our
owned mineral interests.

• Other segment earnings was negatively impacted due to a $3,874,000 non-cash impairment charge of

goodwill related to our central Texas water assets.

• General and administrative expense decreased as result of our key initiative to reduce costs across our

entire organization.

• Gain on sale of assets of $48,891,000 represents the sale of over 58,300 acres of timberland and

undeveloped land in Georgia and Alabama for $104,172,000 in accordance with our key initiative to
divest non-core assets.
Interest expense decreased primarily due to reducing our debt outstanding by $277,790,000 in 2016
and $323,303,000 since third quarter 2015.

•

• Loss on extinguishment of debt of $35,864,000 is related to debt retirement of portions of our 8.50%
Senior Secured Notes due 2022 and 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020, which includes write-
off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $5,489,000 and $1,301,000 in other costs related to tender
offer advisory services.

Current Market Conditions

Sales of new single-family homes in December 2017, according to a joint release by the U.S. Census Bureau

and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of
625,000 units. On a year over year basis, U.S. single family home sales were 14.1% higher than reported in
December 2016. A total of 608,000 new home sales were reported for the year, the highest annual level reported
since 2007. The number of units for sale at the end of December was 295,000, representing a supply of 5.7
months at the current sales rate. The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development jointly announced that housing starts for December 2017 registered a seasonally adjusted annual
rate of 1,192,000 units, representing an 8.2% drop from the November estimate of 1,299,000 and a 6.0%
decrease from prior year. Seasonally adjusted single-family starts in December were 836,000 units, 11.8% below
the revised November rate but 3.5% above prior year. For the year, total housing starts were up 2.4% to
1,202,100, compared to 1,173,800 for 2016, the highest annual rate since 2007. Seasonally adjusted housing
permits, generally viewed as a precursor for housing starts, registered 1,302,000 in December 2017, 0.1% below
the prior month’s revised reading but 2.8% above the December 2016 rate. Homebuilder confidence, as measured
by the National Association of Homebuilders/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index, increased in December on
expectations for a stronger economy and potential regulatory relief for the business community. The monthly
reading of homebuilder sentiment rose 5 points to 74, the highest reading since 1999 and 5 points higher than a
year ago. On a regional basis, the three month moving averages for builders’ confidence increased in all regions
with the Midwest registering the highest increase on a percentage basis, followed by the South. The S&P
CoreLogic Case-Shiller National Index, which measures home price appreciation for the entire nation, reflected
continued price appreciation across the country. On a year over year basis, the S&P Case-Shiller U.S. National
Home Price NSA Index, which covers all nine U.S. Census divisions, reported a 6.2% annual gain in November,
up from 6.1% in the previous month.

Real Estate

We own directly or through ventures interests in 49 residential and mixed-use real estate projects located in
11 states and 16 markets. Our real estate segment secures entitlements and develops infrastructure on our lands,
primarily for single-family residential and mixed-use communities. We own and manage our projects either
directly or through ventures. Our real estate segment revenues are principally derived from the sales of
residential single-family lots and tracts, undeveloped land and commercial real estate, and in 2016 and 2015 from
the operation of income producing properties, primarily a hotel and multifamily properties.

24

A summary of our real estate results follows:

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling

interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Segment earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Revenues in our owned and consolidated ventures consist of:

Residential real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail undeveloped land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and income producing properties . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$112,746
(65,014)
(18,761)
28,971
1,973
1,915
16,500

(In thousands)
$ 190,273
(163,095)
(29,229)
(2,051)
1,368
117,856
5,778

$ 202,830
(113,891)
(40,502)
48,437
2,750
1,585
15,582

(2,078)
$ 47,281

(1,531)
$ 121,420

(676)
$ 67,678

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$ 98,521
13,001
—
91
1,133
$112,746

(In thousands)
$121,196
11,151
35,873
13,738
8,315
$190,273

$ 87,771
5,390
22,851
82,808
4,010
$202,830

Residential real estate revenues principally consist of the sale of single-family lots to local, regional and national

home builders. In 2017, residential real estate revenues decreased primarily due to lower lot sales activity but were
partially offset by higher average sale prices per lot sold and also due to mix of product sold. In 2017, we sold 937 lots
from our owned and consolidated projects at an average price of $89,300 per lot. In addition, in 2017, we sold 189
residential tract acres for $12,546,000 generating earnings of $3,842,000. In 2016, residential real estate revenues
increased as compared to 2015 primarily due to higher lot sales activity but were partially offset by lower average sale
prices per lot as a result of selling 235 bulk lots from four non-core community development projects. Excluding these
non-core sales, we sold 1,427 lots from our owned and consolidated projects at an average price of $71,300 per lot in
2016. In addition, in 2016, we sold 1,539 residential tract acres for $8,728,000 generating earnings of $847,000.

The timing of commercial real estate revenues can vary depending on the demand, mix, project life-cycle, size and

location of the project. In 2017, we sold 98 commercial acres for $13,001,000 from our owned and consolidated projects,
generating earnings of $10,467,000. In 2016, the increase in commercial real estate revenues as compared to 2015 is
primarily due to selling 286 commercial acres from four non-core community development projects, of which 264 acres
were sold from our San Joaquin River project in Antioch, California for $7,330,000 which provided approximately
$37,400,000 in income tax losses to offset tax gains from other sales.

Retail undeveloped land revenues represent land sold from our retail sales program. We did not sell any retail land

in 2017. In 2016, we sold 14,438 acres of retail land for $2,485 per acre, generating approximately $28,098,000 in
earnings. In 2015, we sold 9,645 acres of retail land for $2,369 per acre, generating approximately $16,542,000 in
earnings.

Commercial and income producing properties revenues include revenues from sale of multifamily properties
which we developed as a merchant builder and operated until sold, from hotel room sales and other guest services,
rental revenues from our operating multifamily properties and reimbursement for costs paid to subcontractors plus
development and construction fees from certain multifamily projects. At year-end 2017, we had no owned or
consolidated commercial or income producing properties. In 2016, commercial and income producing properties
revenues decreased as compared with 2015 as result of selling the Radisson Hotel & Suites in Austin, and Eleven, a
multifamily property in Austin, and the impact of selling Midtown Cedar Hill, a multifamily property near Dallas in
2015 for $42,880,000.

Other revenues primarily result from sale of stream and impervious cover credits and from management fee income. In
2017, other revenues principally represents management fee income earned for services provided to certain joint ventures. In
2016, we sold 24 acres of impervious cover credits to home builders for $3,232,000, generating earnings of $2,787,000 and
138,000 mitigation banking credits for $3,265,000, generating earnings of $2,137,000.

25

Units sold consist of:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

Owned and consolidated ventures:

Residential lots sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenue per lot sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial acres sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenue per commercial acre sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undeveloped acres sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenue per acre sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ventures accounted for using the equity method:

Residential lots sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenue per lot sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial acres sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenue per commercial acre sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Undeveloped acres sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenue per acre sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

937
$ 89,312
98
$132,938
—
— $

1,662
$ 66,694
294
$ 37,312
14,438
2,485

$

282
$ 69,384
88
$263,674
—
— $

278
$ 76,866
4
$527,152
476
1,567

$

972
$ 76,594
31
$182,184
9,645
2,369

$

500
$ 78,288
32
$309,224
4,217
2,129

$

Cost of sales in 2017 included non-cash impairment charges of $3,420,000 related to the asset group sold in the

strategic asset sale to Starwood and one non-core mitigation project. Cost of sales in 2016 included non-cash
impairment charges of $56,453,000 associated with six non-core community development projects and two multifamily
sites, of which four non-core community development projects and one multifamily site were sold in 2016 and one
multifamily site was under contract to be sold at year-end 2017. The non-cash impairments were a result of our key
initiative to review our entire portfolio of assets which resulted in business plan changes, inclusive of cash tax savings
considerations, to market these properties for sale. Cost of sales in 2015 includes $33,375,000 in carrying value related
to Midtown Cedar Hill multifamily property we developed as a merchant builder and sold. In addition, cost of sales
includes non-cash impairment charges of $1,044,000 in 2015.

Operating expenses consist of:

Employee compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$ 6,555
3,209
4,532
131
4,334

(In thousands)
$ 8,384
5,996
5,134
976
8,739

$ 8,989
9,031
5,749
7,605
9,128

$18,761

$29,229

$40,502

Employee compensation and benefits decreased as compared to 2016 as result of our key initiative to reduce

costs across our entire organization. In 2017, employee compensation and benefits include $2,254,000 in costs
associated with executive change in control agreements and expense incurred as a result of the Merger with D.R.
Horton. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense and property taxes in 2017 and 2016 are due to the
sale of non-core assets. The decrease in other operating expenses in 2017 is primarily due to pre-acquisition and
development costs incurred in 2016 and 2015 associated with multifamily and mitigation projects that we elected not
to pursue and operating cost savings in 2017 related to non-core community development projects sold in 2016.

Interest income principally represents interest received on reimbursements from utility and improvement districts.

In 2017, gain on sale of assets principally includes a gain of $1,318,000 associated with the reduction of a
surety bond in connection with the Cibolo Canyons Special Improvement District (“CCSID”) bond offering in 2014
and $465,000 of excess hotel occupancy and sales and use tax pledged revenues from CCSID after their payments
to the debt service fund. The surety bond has a balance of $5,312,000 at year-end 2017. The surety bond will
decrease as CCSID makes annual ad valorem tax rebate payments to the owner of the resort, which obligation is
scheduled to be retired in full by 2020.

In 2016, gain on sale of assets includes a gain of $95,336,000 related to sale of Radisson Hotel & Suites, a gain

of $9,116,000 related to sale of Eleven, a gain of $1,223,000 associated with sale of Dillon, a gain of $10,363,000
related to sale of our interest in 3600,, a gain of $3,968,000 associated with sale of Music Row, a loss of $3,870,000
related to selling the Downtown Edge multifamily site, a gain of $1,219,000 associated with the reduction of a

26

surety bond supporting the 2014 CCSID bond offering and $501,000 of excess hotel occupancy and sales and use
tax revenues from CCSID.

Increases in equity earnings from our unconsolidated ventures in 2017 compared with 2016 is primarily due

to higher commercial sales activity from our ventures and a gain of $7,783,000 from the sale of the Acklen
multifamily project from a venture in which we own a 30% interest. Decreases in equity earnings from our
unconsolidated ventures in 2016 compared with 2015 is primarily due to lower residential, commercial and
undeveloped land sales activity.

We underwrite real estate development projects based on a variety of assumptions incorporated into our
development plans, including the timing and pricing of sales and leasing and costs to complete development. Our
development plans are periodically reviewed in comparison to our return projections and expectations, and we
may revise our plans as business conditions warrant. If as a result of changes to our development plans the
anticipated future net cash flows are reduced such that our basis in a project is not fully recoverable, we may be
required to recognize a non-cash impairment charge. See Part I, Item 1. Business for information about our net
investment in owned and consolidated real estate by state at year-end 2017.

Mineral Resources

In 2017, we sold our remaining owned mineral assets for approximately $85,700,000 which generated gains
of $82,422,000. These gains were partially offset by a $37,900,000 non-cash impairment charge associated with
the mineral resources reporting unit goodwill. With the completion of this sale we have divested of all of our
owned mineral assets.

A summary of our mineral resources results follows:

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of mineral resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$ 1,502
(38,315)
(1,452)

(In thousands)
$ 5,076
(763)
(1,159)

(38,265)
82,422
1,395

3,154
—
173

$ 9,094
(2,998)
(2,141)

3,955
—
275

Segment earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 45,552

$ 3,327

$ 4,230

Revenues consist of:

Oil royalties (a)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gas royalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)
$2,905
1,304
867

$5,739
2,138
1,217

$ 900
487
115

$1,502

$5,076

$9,094

(a) Oil royalties includes revenues from oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs).

27

Oil and gas produced and average unit prices related to our royalty interests follows:

Consolidated entities:

Oil production (barrels) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average oil price per barrel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NGL production (barrels) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average NGL price per barrel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total oil production (barrels), including NGLs . . . . . . . . . . .
Average total oil price per barrel, including NGLs . . . . . . . .
Gas production (millions of cubic feet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average price per thousand cubic feet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Our share of ventures accounted for using the equity method:
Gas production (millions of cubic feet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average price per thousand cubic feet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total consolidated and our share of equity method ventures:

Oil production (barrels) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average oil price per barrel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NGL production (barrels) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average NGL price per barrel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total oil production (barrels), including NGLs . . . . . . . . . . .
Average total oil price per barrel, including NGLs . . . . . . . .
Gas production (millions of cubic feet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average price per thousand cubic feet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total BOE (barrel of oil equivalent) (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average price per barrel of oil equivalent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

17,400
$ 50.20
600
$ 22.99
18,000
$ 49.38
159.9
3.05

$

33.4
2.98

$

17,400
$ 50.20
600
$ 22.99
18,000
$ 49.38
193.3
3.03
50,200
$ 29.36

$

70,700
39.74
8,000
11.84
78,700
36.91
633.3
2.06

106,800
50.48
21,500
16.32
128,300
44.76
771.9
2.77

$

$

$

$

143.5
1.97

168.3
2.54

$

$

$

$

$

$

70,700
39.74
8,000
11.84
78,700
36.91
776.8
2.04
208,200
21.58

$

$

$

$

$

106,800
50.48
21,500
16.32
128,300
44.76
940.2
2.73
284,900
29.15

$

$

$

$

$

(a) Gas is converted to barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) using six Mcf to one barrel of oil.

In 2017, oil and gas production revenues decreased principally due to the sale of our remaining owned
mineral assets in first quarter 2017. In 2016, oil and gas production revenues decreased principally as a result of
lower realized oil and gas prices and lower production volumes from our royalty interests.

Cost of mineral resources in 2017 principally includes a non-cash impairment charge of $37,900,000
associated with mineral resources reporting unit goodwill related to the sale of our remaining owned mineral
assets. Cost of mineral resources in 2015 included non-cash impairment charges of $1,802,000 associated with
proved oil and gas properties on our owned mineral interests.

Operating expenses principally consist of employee compensation and benefits, professional services,
property taxes and rent expense. The increase in operating expenses in 2017 as compared to 2016 is due to the
costs of selling our remaining owned mineral assets. The decrease in operating expenses in 2016 as compared to
2015 is primarily due to our key initiative to reduce costs across our entire organization.

In 2017, gain on sale of assets of $82,422,000 represents the gains associated with the sale of our remaining

owned mineral assets.

In 2017, equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures includes $1,245,000 in earnings from a venture in
which we own a 50% interest. These earnings were a result of our purchase of certain minerals assets from the
venture. We purchased these assets from the venture for $2,400,000 and subsequently received our pro-rata share
of the earnings and distributable cash of $1,200,000 from the venture.

Other

At year-end 2017, our other segment consisted of water interests in 1.5 million acres which includes a
45 percent nonparticipating royalty interest in groundwater produced or withdrawn for commercial purposes or
sold from 1.4 million acres in Texas, Louisiana, Georgia and Alabama, and 20,000 acres of groundwater leases in
central Texas. Our nonparticipating royalty interests are classified as assets held for sale at year-end 2017.

28

A summary of our other results follows:

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . .
Segment earnings (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Revenues consist of:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$

74
(6,450)
(421)
(6,797)
400
4
$(6,393)

(In thousands)
$ 1,965
(5,075)
(1,687)
(4,797)
—
172
$(4,625)

$ 6,652
(3,081)
(4,330)
(759)
—
151
$ (608)

Fiber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recreational leases and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

$— $ 897
49
1,019
$1,965

9
65
$74

$5,011
489
1,152
$6,652

Fiber revenues decreased in 2017 and 2016 when compared with 2015 due to terminating timber harvest
activity in support of our key initiative to sell our non-core timberland and undeveloped land. At year-end 2017,
we did not have any remaining timber holdings or recreational leases.

Water revenues for 2017 and 2016 are related to groundwater royalties from our 45 percent nonparticipating

royalty interests in groundwater produced or withdrawn for commercial purposes. Water revenues for 2015 are
associated with a groundwater reservation agreement with Hays County, Texas, which commenced in 2013 and
was terminated in 2015.

Cost of sales in 2017 and 2016 include non-cash impairment charges of $5,363,000 and $3,874,000 related
to our central Texas water assets and $489,000 in non-cash impairment charges in 2017 related to water interests
in Georgia.

Operating expenses principally consist of costs associated with our central Texas water assets which were

$348,000 in 2017, $921,000 in 2016 and $2,162,000 in 2015.

Gain on sale of assets in 2017 represents nonrefundable earnest money forfeited by a buyer that terminated a

contract to purchase our 20,000 acres of groundwater leases in central Texas.

Items Not Allocated to Segments

Items not allocated to segments consist of:

General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based and long-term incentive compensation

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other corporate non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$(50,354)

(7,201)
28,674
(8,532)
(611)
1,627
$(36,397)

(In thousands)
$(18,274)

(4,425)
48,891
(19,985)
(35,864)
350
$(29,307)

$(24,802)

(4,474)
—
(34,066)
—
256
$(63,086)

Unallocated items represent income and expenses managed on a company-wide basis and include general

and administrative expenses, share-based and long-term incentive compensation, gain on sale of strategic
timberland and undeveloped land, interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and other corporate non-
operating income and expense. General and administrative expenses principally consist of costs and expenses
related to accounting and finance, tax, legal, human resources, internal audit, information technology, executive
officers and our board of directors. These functions support all of our business segments.

29

General and administrative expense

General and administrative expenses consist of:

Employee compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Professional and consulting services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Facility costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Merger termination fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$11,608
14,855
849
704
304
20,000
2,034

(In thousands)
$ 9,063
4,541
744
704
404
—
2,818

$11,729
6,056
889
682
595
—
4,851

$50,354

$18,274

$24,802

The increase in general and administrative expense in 2017 when compared with 2016 is primarily due to merger

transaction costs of $37,216,000 which includes a merger termination fee of $20,000,000 paid to Starwood Capital
Group, $11,787,000 in professional fees and other costs, and $5,429,000 in executive severance and change in control
costs, all incurred as a result of the Merger. The decrease in general and administrative expense in 2016 when
compared with 2015 is primarily due to our key initiative to reduce costs across our entire organization.

Share-based compensation and long-term incentive compensation expense

The increase in share-based compensation and long-term incentive compensation expense in 2017 is principally

due to $4,349,000 in expense as a result of the acceleration of vesting and settlement of awards upon closing of the
Merger.

Gain on sale of assets

In 2017, we sold approximately 19,000 acres of timberland and undeveloped land in Georgia and Texas for
$46,197,000 generating net proceeds of $45,396,000 and resulting in a gain on sale of assets of $28,674,000. In 2016,
we sold over 58,300 acres of timberland and undeveloped land in Georgia and Alabama for $104,172,000 generating
net proceeds of $103,238,000 and resulting in a gain on sale of assets of $48,891,000.

Interest expense

The decrease in interest expense in 2017 and 2016 is due to reducing our debt outstanding by $277,790,000 in

2016 and $325,807,000 since third quarter-end 2015.

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

In 2017, we retired portions of our 8.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 and 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due

2020 resulting in a net loss on debt extinguishment of $611,000. In 2016, we retired portions of our 8.50% Senior Secured
Notes and 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes resulting in a net loss on debt extinguishment of $35,864,000, which includes
write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $5,489,000 and $1,301,000 in other costs.

Income taxes

Our income tax expense from continuing operations was $45,820,000, $15,302,000 and $35,131,000 in 2017,

2016 and 2015 and our effective tax rate was 88 percent, 17 percent, and 395 percent in each of these years. The
effective tax rate for all years includes an expense for state income taxes and non-deductible expenses, reduced by a tax
benefit related to noncontrolling interests. The effective tax rate for 2017 also includes an expense for non-deductible
goodwill related to the sale of our owned mineral interests and non-deductible transaction costs related to the Merger
with D.R. Horton. Other 2017 differences, including the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as a
result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”), are fully offset by a change in our valuation allowance. The effective
tax rate for 2016 includes a change in valuation allowance due to a decrease in our deferred tax assets. The effective
rate for 2015 includes the establishment of a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.

The Tax Act was enacted on December 22, 2017 and reduced the federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21

percent for all corporations effective January 1, 2018. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740 requires
companies to reflect the effects of a tax law change in the period in which the law is enacted. Accordingly, we have
remeasured our deferred tax assets and liabilities along with the corresponding valuation allowance as of the enactment
date. This remeasurement resulted in no additional tax expense or benefit except for the release of a portion of our
valuation allowance for minimum tax credits which become fully refundable in future years. We have determined

30

based on current available information that no other tax law changes as a result of the Tax Act have a significant impact
on our 2017 tax expense. The adjustment to the deferred tax accounts and our determination that no other tax law
changes have a significant impact on our 2017 tax expense are our best estimate based on the information available at
this time and may change as additional information, such as regulatory guidance, becomes available. Any required
adjustment would be reflected as a discrete expense or benefit in the quarter that it is identified, as allowed by SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.

On October 5, 2017, D.R. Horton acquired 75 percent of our common stock resulting in an ownership change
under Section 382. Section 382 limits our ability to use certain tax attributes and built-in losses and deductions in a
given year. Any tax attributes or built-in losses and deductions that are limited in the current year are expected to be
fully utilized in future years.

At year-end 2017 and 2016, we have provided a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset of $39,578,000 and
$73,405,000 respectively for the portion of the deferred tax asset that we have determined is more likely than not to be
unrealizable. The decrease in the valuation allowance for the year was primarily attributable to the remeasurement of
deferred tax assets and liabilities as a result of the tax rate decrease from the Tax Act.

In determining our valuation allowance, we assessed available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether
sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax asset. A significant piece of
objective evidence evaluated was the cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,
principally driven by impairments of oil and gas and real estate properties. Such evidence limits our ability to consider
other subjective evidence, such as our projected future taxable income.

The amount of deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted if negative evidence in the form of
cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight is given to subjective evidence, such as our projected
future taxable income.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Sources and Uses of Cash

The consolidated statements of cash flows for 2017, 2016 and 2015 reflects cash flows from both continuing and

discontinued operations. We operate in cyclical industries and our cash flows fluctuate accordingly. Our principal
sources of cash are proceeds from the sale of real estate and reimbursements from utility and improvement districts.
Our principal cash requirements are for the acquisition and development of real estate, either directly or indirectly
through ventures, taxes, interest and compensation. Operating cash flows are affected by the timing of the payment of
real estate development expenditures and the collection of proceeds from the eventual sale of the real estate, the timing
of which can vary substantially depending on many factors including the size of the project and state and local
permitting requirements and availability of utilities. Working capital varies based on a variety of factors, including the
timing of sales of real estate and collection of receivables, reimbursement from utility and improvement districts and
the payment of payables and expenses.

We regularly evaluate alternatives for managing our capital structure and liquidity profile in consideration of
expected cash flows, growth and operating capital requirements and capital market conditions. We may, at any time, be
considering or be in discussions with respect to the purchase or sale of our common stock, debt securities, convertible
securities or a combination thereof.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash flows from our real estate acquisition and development activities, retail land sales, commercial and income

producing properties, timber sales, income from oil and gas properties, recreational leases and reimbursements from
utility and improvement districts are classified as operating cash flows.

In 2017, net cash used in operating activities was $16,215,000. The net cash used in operating activities when

compared to 2016 is primarily due to payment of $33,149,000 in costs associated with the Merger, higher real estate
acquisition and development expenditures of $103,904,000, no retail land sales in 2017, and a decrease in residential
sales activity from owned and consolidated projects.

In 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $66,877,000. The increase in net cash provided by

operating activities when compared with 2015 is primarily due to lower real estate acquisition and development
expenditures of $81,179,000, proceeds of $34,748,000 from retail undeveloped land sales activity and higher lot sales
from owned and consolidated ventures, including proceeds of $19,335,000 from sale of non-core community
development projects.

In 2015, net cash provided by operating activities was $35,126,000 principally due to the sale of Midtown Cedar

Hill for $42,880,000.

31

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Capital contributions to and capital distributions from unconsolidated ventures, costs incurred to acquire, develop
and construct multifamily projects that will be held as commercial properties upon stabilization as investment property,
business acquisitions and investment in oil and gas properties and equipment are classified as investing activities.

In 2017, net cash provided by investing activities was $134,544,000. The decrease in net cash provided by

investing activities as compared with 2016 is primarily due to less net proceeds from non-core asset sales. In
2017, cash proceeds from the sale of non-core assets was $130,146,000, which principally included $85,240,000
from the sale of our owned mineral assets and $45,396,000 from the sale of our remaining 19,000 acres of
timberland and undeveloped land in Georgia and Texas.

In 2016, net cash provided by investing activities was $420,743,000. The increase in net cash provided by

investing activities year over year is primarily due to $427,849,000 in net proceeds from the execution of our key
initiative to opportunistically divest non-core assets. Non-core asset sales includes $128,764,000 from sale of
Radisson Hotel & Suites, $103,238,000 from sale of over 58,300 acres of strategic timberland and undeveloped
land in Georgia, $77,105,000 from sale of certain oil and gas working interest properties, $59,719,000 from sale
of Eleven, $25,428,000 from sale of Dillon, $14,703,000 from sale of Music Row, $13,917,000 from sale our
interest in 3600 and $4,975,000 from sale of the Downtown Edge multifamily site.

In 2015, net cash used in investing activities was $60,328,000 principally due to our investment of

$49,717,000 in oil and gas working interest properties associated with previously committed capital investments
related to exploration and production operations and a net investment in unconsolidated ventures of $14,181,000.
In addition, we invested $14,690,000 in property and equipment, software and reforestation, of which $5,953,000
is related to capital expenditures for the Radisson Hotel & Suites hotel in Austin, which we sold in 2016. These
investments were partially offset by proceeds from sale of assets of $18,260,000 principally related to sale of
certain oil and gas properties.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

In 2017, net cash used in financing activities was $62,344,000. The decrease in net cash used in financing

activities is primarily due to less debt retirements in 2017 as compared to 2016. This was partially offset by a
$40,000,000 increase in restricted cash to secure our Letter of Credit Facility entered into in fourth quarter 2017
and $12,786,000 for the settlement of share-based awards related to the Merger.

In 2016, net cash used in financing activities was $318,264,000 principally due to retirement of

$225,245,000 of our 8.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2022, $5,000,000 of our 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes
due 2020, $9,000,000 of payments related to amortizing notes associated with our tangible equity units and our
payment of $39,336,000 in loans secured by Radisson Hotel & Suites and Eleven multifamily property. In
addition, we purchased 283,976 shares of common stock for $3,537,000.

In 2015, net cash used in financing activities was $48,483,000 principally due to our payment of a

$24,166,000 loan secured by Midtown Cedar Hill, retirement of $19,440,000 of our 8.50% Senior Secured Notes
due 2022 and $9,000,000 of payments related to amortizing notes associated with our tangible equity units.

Liquidity

We have significantly reduced our outstanding debt since 2015 and have also generated significant
additional cash as a result of execution of our key initiatives over the past two years. The merger with D.R.
Horton provides us an opportunity to increase lot sales by establishing a strategic relationship to supply finished
lots to D. R. Horton at market prices under the Master Supply Agreement. We expect to fund our investment
initially with cash reserves, and we are continuing to evaluate our longer-term capital structure, projected future
liquidity and working capital requirements. We expect to pursue a new credit facility to support anticipated
growth and will also consider other alternatives to raise additional capital in the future, such as issuing debt or
equity securities, as our capital requirements increase.

On February 8, 2018, we entered into and closed on a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Starwood to sell

24 legacy projects for $232,000,000 which generated approximately $216,000,000 in net proceeds to us after
certain purchase price adjustments, closing costs and other costs associated with selling these projects. On
February 23, 2018, we had over $530,000,000 in consolidated cash on our balance sheet.

Letter of Credit Facility
On October 5, 2017, we entered into a Letter of Credit Facility Agreement providing for a $30,000,000

secured standby letter of credit facility (the “LC Facility”). The LC Facility is secured by $30,000,000 in cash
deposited with the administrative agent. In addition, we have $10,000,000 on deposit with a participating lender.
At year-end 2017, $14,072,000 was outstanding under the LC Facility.

32

Termination of Senior Credit Facility
On October 5, 2017, in connection with entry into the LC Facility, we terminated our senior credit facility

(the “Prior Credit Facility”). The Prior Credit Facility provided for a $50,000,000 revolving line of credit that
was scheduled to mature on May 15, 2018. This Prior Credit Facility could be prepaid at any time without
penalty and included a $50,000,000 sublimit for letters of credit. All outstanding letters of credit at the time of
termination were transferred to the new LC Facility.

3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020
In 2013, we issued $125,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020

(Convertible Notes). Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semiannually at a rate of 3.75 percent per annum
and they mature on March 1, 2020. The Convertible Notes had an initial conversion rate of 40.8351 per $1,000
principal amount. The initial conversion rate was subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Prior
to November 1, 2019, the Convertible Notes are convertible only upon certain circumstances, and thereafter are
convertible at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day prior to maturity.

On October 5, 2017, we had $120,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes outstanding. In
connection with the consummation of the Merger, we entered into a Third Supplemental Indenture (together with
the base indenture and the prior supplemental indentures, the “Indenture”) to the Indenture relating to our
Convertible Notes.

Pursuant to the Third Supplemental Indenture, the Convertible Notes are no longer convertible into shares of

our Former Forestar Common Stock and instead are convertible into cash and shares of our New Forestar Common
Stock based on the per-share weighted average of the cash and shares of New Forestar Common Stock received by
our stockholders that affirmatively made an election in connection with the Merger. As a result of such elections, for
each share of Former Forestar Common Stock a holder of Convertible Notes was previously entitled to receive upon
conversion of Convertible Notes, such holder is instead entitled to receive $579.77062 in cash and 8.17192 shares of
New Forestar Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes surrendered for conversion.

The completion of the Merger constituted a Fundamental Change, as defined in the Indenture. On

October 12, 2017, in accordance with the Indenture, we gave notice of the Fundamental Change to holders of the
Convertible Notes and made an offer to purchase (a “Fundamental Change Offer”) all or any part (equal to
$1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000) of every holder’s Convertible Notes. Under this offer, we repurchased
$1,077,000 of Notes, and recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87,000.

At year-end 2017, unamortized debt discount of our Convertible Notes was $9,726,000. The effective
interest rate on the liability component was 8 percent and the carrying amount of the equity component was
$16,847,000. We intend to settle the principal amount of Convertible Notes in cash upon conversion, with any
excess conversion value to be settled in shares of our common stock.

In 2016, we purchased $5,000,000 of Convertible Notes at 93.25 percent of face value in open market

transactions for $4,663,000 and we allocated $4,452,000 to extinguish the debt and $211,000 to reacquire the
equity component within the convertible notes based on the fair value of the debt component. We recognized a
$110,000 loss on extinguishment of debt based on the difference between the fair value of the debt component
prior to conversion and the carrying value of the debt component. Total loss on extinguishment of debt including
write-off of debt issuance costs allocated to the repurchased notes was $183,000.

8.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2022
On October 30, 2017, we redeemed the remaining $5,315,000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding

8.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “Notes”). The Notes were redeemed for $5,928,000 and the
redemption resulted in a $524,000 loss on extinguishment of debt.

In 2016, we completed a cash tender offer for our Notes, pursuant to which we purchased $215,495,000
principal amount of the outstanding Notes. Total consideration paid was $245,604,000, which included $29,091,000
in premium and $1,018,000 in accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we received consent from holders of the
Notes to eliminate or modify certain covenants, events of default and other provisions contained in the indenture
governing the Notes, and to release the subsidiary guarantees and collateral securing the Notes. We also purchased
$9,750,000 principal amount of the Notes in open market transactions. The cash tender offer and open market
purchases resulted in a $35,681,000 loss on extinguishment of debt, which included the premium paid to repurchase
the Notes, write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $5,416,000 and $1,301,000 in other costs.

33

Contractual Obligations

At year-end 2017, contractual obligations consist of:

Payments Due or Expiring by Year

Total

2018

Debt (a) (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest payments on debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Performance bond (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letter of credit (a)

$119,213
9,673
15,602
1,762
5,312
6,846

$

290
4,470
15,602
1,313
5,312
6,846

2019-20
(In thousands)
$118,923
5,203
—
388
—
—

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$158,408

$33,833

$124,514

2021-22 Thereafter

$—
—
—
61
—
—

$61

$—
—
—
—
—
—

$—

(a)

Items included in our balance sheet.

(b) Gross debt excluding unamortized discount and financing fees.

Interest payments on debt include interest payments related to our fixed rate debt.

Purchase obligations are defined as legally binding and enforceable agreements to purchase goods and
services. Our purchase obligations include open commitments for land acquisition and development related to
community development projects.

Our operating leases are for facilities, equipment and groundwater. We lease space in Austin as our
corporate headquarters and also lease office space in other locations in support of our business operations. The
total remaining contractual obligations for these leases is $1,762,000 at year-end 2017. Our groundwater leases
for about 20,000 acres in central Texas had no remaining contractual financial obligations at year-end 2017,
however, in first quarter 2018, we have extended the groundwater leases on approximately 10,000 core surface
acres for up to three additional years and will allow groundwater leases on approximately 10,000 non-core acres
to expire.

The performance bond and standby letter of credit were provided in support of a bond issuance by CCSID.

In 2014, we received $50,550,000 from CCSID principally related to its issuance of $48,900,000 Hotel
Occupancy Tax (HOT) and Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds. These bonds are obligations solely of CCSID and
are payable from HOT and sales and use taxes levied by CCSID. To facilitate the issuance of the bonds, we
provided a $6,846,000 letter of credit to the bond trustee as security for certain debt service fund obligations in
the event CCSID tax collections are not sufficient to support payment of the bonds in accordance with their
terms. The letter of credit must be maintained until the earlier of redemption of the bonds or scheduled bond
maturity in 2034. We also entered into an agreement with the owner of the Resort to assign its senior rights to us
in exchange for consideration provided by us, including a surety bond to be drawn if CCSID tax collections are
not sufficient to support ad valorem tax rebates payable. The surety bond decreases as CCSID makes annual ad
valorem tax rebate payments, which obligation is scheduled to be retired in full by 2020. At year-end 2017, the
surety bond was $5,312,000. Our rights to receive the excess HOT and sales taxes from CCSID was excluded
from the strategic asset sale to Starwood.

In support of our core community development business, we have a $40,000,000 surety bond program that

provides financial assurance to beneficiaries related to execution and performance of our land development
business. At year-end 2017, there were $14,708,000 outstanding under this program.

34

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time to time, we may enter into off-balance sheet arrangements to facilitate our operating activities. At year-
end 2017, our off-balance sheet unfunded arrangements, excluding contractual interest payments, purchase obligations,
operating lease obligations and venture contributions included in the table of contractual obligations, consist of:

Payments Due or Expiring by Year

Total

2018

2019-20

2021-22 Thereafter

Performance bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Standby letters of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recourse obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 9,396
7,226
438
$17,060

$ 9,396
6,620
281
$16,297

(In thousands)
$ —
606
141
$747

$—
—
16
$16

$—
—
—
$—

In 2014, FMF Littleton LLC, an equity method venture in which we own a 25 percent interest, obtained a senior
secured construction loan in the amount of $46,384,000 to develop a 385-unit multifamily project located in Littleton,
Colorado. The outstanding balance was $45,875,000 at year-end 2017. We provided the lender with a guaranty of
completion of the improvements; a guaranty for repayment of 25 percent of the principal balance and unpaid accrued
interest; and a standard nonrecourse carve-out guaranty. The principal guaranty was reduced from 25 percent of
principal to ten percent upon achievement of certain conditions.

Accounting Policies

Critical Accounting Estimates

In preparing our financial statements, we follow generally accepted accounting principles, which in many cases require

us to make assumptions, estimates, and judgments that affect the amounts reported. Our significant accounting policies are
included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Many of these principles are relatively straightforward. There
are, however, a few accounting policies that are critical because they are important in determining our financial condition
and results of operations and involve significant assumptions, estimates and judgments that are difficult to determine. We
must make these assumptions, estimates and judgments currently about matters that are inherently uncertain, such as future
economic conditions, operating results and valuations, as well as our intentions. As the difficulty increases, the level of
precision decreases, meaning actual results can, and probably will, differ from those currently estimated. We base our
assumptions, estimates and judgments on a combination of historical experiences and other factors that we believe are
reasonable. We have reviewed the selection and disclosure of these critical accounting estimates with our Audit Committee.

At year-end 2017, we have divested all of our oil and gas working interest assets and our owned mineral assets.

Critical accounting estimates related to oil and gas such as accrued oil and gas revenue, impairment of oil and gas
properties, oil and gas reserves and asset retirement obligations are not material to our financial statements for year-end
2017 or 2016 but are disclosed to provide our policies and impact on our financial condition and results of operations
for the year ended 2015.

•

•

•

Investment in Real Estate and Cost of Real Estate Sales — In allocating costs to real estate owned and real
estate sold, we must estimate current and future real estate values. Our estimates of future real estate values
sometimes must extend over periods 15 to 20 years from today and are dependent on numerous assumptions
including our intentions and future market and economic conditions. In addition, when we sell real estate
from projects that are not finished, we must estimate future development costs through completion.
Differences between our estimates and actual results will affect future carrying values and operating results.
Impairment of Real Estate Long-Lived Assets — Measuring real estate assets for impairment requires estimating
the future undiscounted cash flows based on our intentions as to holding periods, and the residual value of assets
under review, primarily undeveloped land. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash
flows, we will adjust the carrying amount of the real estate long-lived assets to fair value. Depending on the asset
under review, we use varying methods to determine fair value, such as discounting expected future cash flows,
determining resale values by market, or applying a capitalization rate to net operating income using prevailing
rates in a given market. Changes in economic conditions, demand for real estate, and the projected net operating
income for a specific property will inevitably change our estimates.
Impairment of Goodwill — Measuring goodwill for impairment annually requires estimation of future cash
flows and determination of fair values using many assumptions and inputs, including estimated future selling
prices and volumes, estimated future costs to develop and explore, observable market inputs, weighted
average cost of capital, estimated operating expenses and various other projected economic factors. Changes
in economic and operating conditions can affect these assumptions and could result in additional interim
testing and goodwill impairment charges in the future periods.

35

•

•

Share-Based Compensation — We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options. The determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model is affected by the stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of other variables.
These variables include expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, actual and projected
employee stock option exercise behaviors (term of option), risk-free interest rate and expected dividends. The
expected life was based on the simplified method utilizing the midpoint between the vesting period and the
contractual life of the awards. The expected stock price volatility was determined using a blend of historical and
implied volatility. Pre-vesting forfeitures are estimated based upon the pool of participants and their expected
activity and historical trends. We use Monte Carlo simulation pricing model to determine the fair value of
market-leveraged stock units (MSUs) and stock option awards with market condition. A typical Monte Carlo
exercise simulates a distribution of stock prices to yield an expected distribution of stock prices at the end of the
performance period. The simulations are repeated many times in order to derive a probabilistic assessment of
stock performance. The stock-paths are simulated using assumptions which include expected stock price
volatility and risk-free interest rate.
Income Taxes — In preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant judgment is required to estimate
our income taxes. Our estimates are based on our interpretation of federal and state tax laws. We estimate our
actual current tax due and assess temporary and permanent differences resulting from differing treatment of items
for tax and accounting purposes. The temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are
included in our consolidated balance sheet. If needed, we record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax
assets. In addition, when we believe a tax position is supportable but the outcome uncertain, we include the item
in our tax return but do not recognize the related benefit in our provision for taxes. Instead, we record a reserve
for unrecognized tax benefits, which represents our expectation of the most likely outcome considering the
technical merits and specific facts of the position. Changes to liabilities are only made when an event occurs that
changes the most likely outcome, such as settlement with the relevant tax authority, expiration of statutes of
limitations, changes in tax law, or recent court rulings. Adjustments to temporary differences, permanent
differences or uncertain tax positions could materially impact our financial position, cash flow and results of
operation.

•

• Accrued Oil and Gas Revenue — We recognized revenue as oil and gas was produced and sold. There were a
significant amount of oil and gas properties which we did not operate and, therefore, revenue was typically
recorded in the month of production based on an estimate of our share of volumes produced and prices realized.
We obtained the most current available production data from the operators and price indices for each well to
estimate the accrual of revenue. Obtaining production data on a timely basis for some wells was not feasible;
therefore we utilized past production receipts and estimated sales price information to estimate accrual of
working interest revenue on all other non-operated wells each month. Revisions to such estimates were recorded
as actual results became known.
Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties — We reviewed our proved oil and gas properties for impairment whenever
events and circumstances indicated that a decline in the recoverability of their carrying value may have occurred. We
estimated the expected undiscounted future cash flows of our oil and gas properties and compared such undiscounted
future cash flows to the carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying amount was
recoverable. If the carrying amount exceeded the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, we would adjust the
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to fair value. The factors used to determine fair value were subject to our
judgment and expertise and included, but were not limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the present
value of future cash flows, net of estimated operating and development costs using estimates of proved reserves,
future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures, and various discount rates
commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing the expected cash flows
projected. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these factors, we could not predict when or if future impairment
charges for proved properties would be recorded.
The assessment of unproved properties to determine any possible impairment required significant judgment. We
assessed our unproved properties periodically for impairment on a property-by-property basis based on remaining
lease terms, drilling results or future plans to develop acreage. Due to the uncertainty inherent in these factors, we
could not predict the amount of impairment charges that may be recorded in the future.

• Oil and Gas Reserves — The estimation of oil and gas reserves was a significant estimate which affected the

amount of non-cash depletion expense we recorded as well as impairment analysis we performed. On an annual
basis, we engaged an independent petroleum engineering firm to assist us in preparing estimates of oil and gas
reserves based on available geologic and seismic data, reservoir pressure data, core analysis reports, well logs,
analogous reservoir performance history, production data and other available sources of engineering, geological
and geophysical information.

36

Oil and gas prices were volatile and largely affected by worldwide or domestic production and consumption and
were outside our control.

• Asset Retirement Obligations — We made estimates of the future costs of the retirement obligations of our
producing oil and gas properties. Estimating future costs involved significant assumptions and judgments
regarding such factors as estimated costs of plugging and abandonment, timing of settlements, discount rates and
inflation rates. Such cost estimates could be subject to significant revisions in subsequent years due to changes in
regulatory requirements, technological advances and other factors which may be difficult to predict.

Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

Please read Note 2 — New and Pending Accounting Pronouncements to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Effects of Inflation

Inflation has had minimal effects on operating results the past three years.

Legal Proceedings

We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of doing business. We

believe we have established adequate reserves for any probable losses, and we do not believe that the outcome of any of
these proceedings should have a material adverse effect on our financial position, long-term results of operations, or cash
flow. It is possible, however, that charges related to these matters could be significant to results of operations or cash flows
in any one accounting period.

37

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We have no significant exposure to interest rate risk.

Foreign Currency Risk

We have no exposure to foreign currency fluctuations.

Commodity Price Risk

We have no significant exposure to commodity price fluctuations.

38

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Index to Financial Statements

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audited Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Financial Statement Schedule

Page

40
41
42

43
44
45
46
47

Schedule III — Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76

39

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Forestar is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Management has designed our internal control over financial reporting to provide reasonable
assurance that our published financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.

Management is required by paragraph (c) of Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, to assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of each year end. In
making this assessment, management used the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Management conducted the required assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial

reporting as of year-end. Based upon this assessment, management believes that our internal control over
financial reporting is effective as of year-end 2017.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our financial statements
included in this Form 10-K, has also audited our internal control over financial reporting. Their attestation report
follows this report of management.

40

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Forestar Group Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Forestar Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based
on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Forestar
Group Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of Forestar Group Inc. as of December 31, 2017 and
2016, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15 (a), and our report dated February 28, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and
for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial
reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, Texas
February 28, 2018

41

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Forestar Group Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Forestar Group Inc. (the Company) as of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income (loss), equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and financial statement
schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (a) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In
our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 28, 2018 expressed
an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.

Austin, Texas
February 28, 2018

42

FORESTAR GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Receivables, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill and other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands, except
share data)

$321,783
40,017
130,380
—
181,607
64,579
6,307
6,674
3,118
2,003
2,028
448
2,968

$265,798
275
293,003
14
30,377
77,611
8,931
10,867
2,000
3,116
323
37,900
2,993

TOTAL ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$761,912

$733,208

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued employee compensation and benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued property taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Earnest money deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt, net

TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
EQUITY
Forestar Group Inc. shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share, 200,000,000 authorized shares, 41,938,936

issued at December 31, 2017 and 44,803,603 issued at December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, at cost, 0 shares at December 31, 2017 and 3,187,253 shares at

$

2,382
8,994
2,153
1,489
11,940
5,942
—
1,017
13,934
108,429

$

4,804
4,126
2,008
1,585
10,511
12,598
5,295
103
19,702
110,358

156,280

171,090

41,939
505,977
56,296

44,804
553,005
12,602

December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

— (49,760)

Total Forestar Group Inc. shareholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

604,212
1,420

560,651
1,467

TOTAL EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

605,632

562,118

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$761,912

$733,208

Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

43

FORESTAR GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

REVENUES

Real estate sales and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commercial and income producing properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 112,655
91

$ 176,535
13,738

$ 120,022
82,808

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mineral resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

COST AND EXPENSES

Cost of real estate sales and other
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of commercial and income producing properties . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of mineral resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OPERATING INCOME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE

112,746
1,502
74

114,322

(65,012)
(2)
(38,315)
(6,450)
(21,658)
(56,531)

(187,968)
113,411
39,765
17,899
(8,532)
(611)
3,600

190,273
5,076
1,965

197,314

(147,653)
(15,442)
(763)
(5,075)
(33,177)
(21,597)

(223,707)
166,747
140,354
6,123
(19,985)
(35,864)
1,718

TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52,121
(45,820)

92,346
(15,302)

202,830
9,094
6,652

218,576

(52,640)
(61,251)
(2,998)
(3,081)
(48,996)
(27,253)

(196,219)
1,585
23,942
16,008
(34,066)
—
3,006

8,890
(35,131)

(26,241)

NET INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS . . . . . .
INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET

OF TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME (LOSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO FORESTAR

6,301

77,044

46,031

52,332
(2,078)

(16,865)

(186,130)

60,179
(1,531)

(212,371)
(676)

GROUP INC.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 50,254

$ 58,648

$(213,047)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42,143
42,381

34,546
42,334

34,266
34,266

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER BASIC SHARE

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER BASIC SHARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER DILUTED SHARE

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER DILUTED SHARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$

$

$
$

$

0.10
1.09

1.19

0.10
1.09

1.19

$
$

$

$
$

$

1.80 $
(0.40) $

1.40 $

1.78 $
(0.40) $

1.38 $

(0.79)
(5.43)

(6.22)

(0.79)
(5.43)

(6.22)

Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

44

FORESTAR GROUP INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Forestar Group Inc. Shareholders’ Equity

Common Stock

Total

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Treasury Stock

Shares

Amount

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)

Non-
controlling
Interests

Balance at December 31, 2014 . . $ 709,742 36,946,603 $36,947 $558,945 (3,485,278) $(55,691) $ 167,001
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— (213,047)
—
Distributions to noncontrolling

(212,371)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—
—
—

—

—

$ 2,540
676

(701)

—

—

—

—
—

—

$ 2,515
1,531

—

—

—
—
—

—

—

$ 1,467
2,078

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

— (5,362)

335,611

5,362

—

—

—
—

(33)

3,999

64

(1)

(51,521)

(761)

125
8,576

(6,579)
—

(125)
—

interest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Issuances of common stock for

vested share-settled units . . . . .

Issuances from exercises of pre-
spin stock options, net of
swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares withheld for payroll

(701)

—

31

taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(762)

Forfeitures of restricted stock

awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . .
Tax benefit from exercise of

restricted stock units and stock
options and vested restricted
stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
8,576

Issuances of common stock for

vested share-settled units . . . . .
Issuances from exercises of stock
options, net of swaps . . . . . . . .

Shares withheld for payroll

taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares repurchased . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . .
Settlement of tangible equity

units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reacquisition of equity
component related to
convertible debt

. . . . . . . . . . . .

—

328

(222)
(3,537)
4,045

(400)

—

—

(400)

—

—

Balance at December 31, 2015 . . $ 504,115 36,946,603 $36,947 $561,850 (3,203,768) $(51,151) $ (46,046)
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58,648
—
Distributions to noncontrolling

60,179

—

—

—

—

interest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,579)

—

—

—

—

— (2,579)

— (4,570)

288,397

4,570

—

—
—
—

(224)

35,406

552

(28)
(23,312)
— (283,976)
—

4,045

(194)
(3,537)
—

— 7,857,000

7,857

(7,857)

(211)

—

—

(211)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—
—

—

—

—

Balance at December 31, 2016 . . $ 562,118 44,803,603 $44,804 $553,005 (3,187,253) $(49,760) $ 12,602
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50,254
—
Distributions to noncontrolling

52,332

—

—

—

—

interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(2,125)

Issuances of common stock for

vested share-settled units . . . . .
Issuances from exercises of stock
options, net of swaps . . . . . . . .

Shares withheld for payroll

taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retirement of treasury shares . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . .
Settlement of equity awards . . . . .

—

616

(981)

—
— (2,864,667)
—
—

6,458
(12,786)

—

—

—

—

— (2,125)

— (5,224)

335,261

5,224

—

(367)

63,195

983

—

—

—
(2,865)
—
6,458
— (12,786)

— (75,870)
(35,109) 2,864,667
—
—

(981)
44,534
—
—

—
(6,560)
—
—

—

—

—
—
—
—

Balance at December 31, 2017 . . $ 605,632 41,938,936 $41,939 $505,977

— $

— $ 56,296

$ 1,420

Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

45

FORESTAR GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Consolidated net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments:

Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distributions of earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dry hole and unproved leasehold impairment costs . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate development and acquisition expenditures, net . . . . . .
Reimbursements from utility and improvement districts . . . . . . . .
Asset impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on debt extinguishment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in:

Notes and accounts receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Property, equipment, software, reforestation and other . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas properties and equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return of investment in unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments of debt
Additions to debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement of equity awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repurchases of common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payroll taxes on restricted stock and stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at year-end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW

INFORMATION:

Cash paid during the year for:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

$ 52,332

$ 60,179

$(212,371)

5,463
(1,705)
(17,899)
23,041
6,643
63,999
—
(103,904)
20,071
47,172
611
(113,214)
2,877

2,686
(1,345)
(7,236)
4,193
(16,215)

(52)
(2,400)
(4,548)
130,146
11,398
134,544

11,447
(1,360)
(6,123)
7,719
4,037
98,412
—
(81,179)
27,107
60,939
35,864
(153,083)
5,359

13,214
(133)
(16,711)
1,189
66,877

(6,138)
(579)
(6,089)
427,849
5,700
420,743

45,085
41,261
(16,008)
12,741
4,246
87,733
67,639
(107,988)
15,176
108,184
—
(879)
4,680

(978)
3,026
(11,868)
(4,553)
35,126

(14,690)
(49,717)
(26,349)
18,260
12,168
(60,328)

(10,049)
3,036
(313)
(39,742)
(2,125)
(12,786)
616
—
(981)
—
(62,344)
55,985
265,798
$ 321,783

(315,229)
3,184
—
—
(2,579)
—
—
(3,537)
(222)
119
(318,264)
169,356
96,442
$ 265,798

(58,220)
11,463
(295)
—
(701)
—
—
—
(762)
32
(48,483)
(73,685)
170,127
$ 96,442

Interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes paid (refunds) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INFORMATION:
Capitalized interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$

$

$ 14,790
4,913
(2,699) $ 10,205

$ 27,330
(4,077)
$

1,655

$

2,838

$

2,938

Please read the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

46

FORESTAR GROUP INC

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Forestar Group Inc., all subsidiaries, ventures and other

entities in which we have a controlling interest. We account for our investment in other entities in which we have significant
influence over operations and financial policies using the equity method (we recognize our share of the entities’ income or
loss and any preferential returns and treat distributions as a reduction of our investment). We eliminate all material
intercompany accounts and transactions. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated pass-through entities are recognized before
income taxes.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States,
which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events. Actual results can, and probably will, differ from
those we currently estimate.

At year-end 2016, we had divested substantially all of our oil and gas working interest properties. As a result of this

significant change in our operations, we have reported the results of operations and financial position of these assets as
discontinued operations within the consolidated statements of income (loss) and consolidated balance sheets for all periods
presented. In addition, in 2016, we changed the name of the oil and gas segment to mineral resources to reflect the strategic
shift from oil and gas working interest investments to owned mineral interests.

The transactions included in our net income in the consolidated statements of income (loss) are the same as those that

would be presented in other comprehensive income. Thus, our net income equates to other comprehensive income.

We are evaluating the impact of any potential changes in our accounting policies and related party transactions with D.R.

Horton post-merger and will update our disclosures accordingly in future periods. The merger was accounted for under the
acquisition method in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). D.R. Horton was the
acquirer for accounting purposes and our consolidated financial statements will continue to be stated at historical cost.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and other short-term instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Cash Flows

The consolidated statements of cash flows for 2017, 2016 and 2015 reflect cash flows from both continuing and
discontinued operations. Expenditures for the acquisition and development of single-family and multifamily real estate that
we intend to develop for sale are classified as operating activities. Expenditures for the acquisition and development of
properties to be held and operated, investment in oil and gas properties and equipment, and business acquisitions are classified
as investing activities.

Change in Fiscal Year

As a result of the Merger with D.R. Horton, we have elected to change our fiscal year-end from December 31 to
September 30, effective January 1, 2018. This change will align our fiscal year-end reporting calendar with D.R. Horton.

Environmental and Asset Retirement Obligations

We recognize environmental remediation liabilities on an undiscounted basis when environmental assessments or
remediation are probable and we can reasonably estimate the cost. We adjust these liabilities as further information is
obtained or circumstances change. With the sale of our remaining oil and gas entities in 2017 we no longer have asset
retirement obligations related to the abandonment and site restoration requirements that result from the acquisition,
construction and development of oil and gas working interest properties, which we have divested. Prior to the sale, we
recorded the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it was incurred and a
corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Accretion expense related to the asset retirement
obligation and depletion expense related to capitalized asset retirement costs are included in cost of mineral resources and in
discontinued operations on our consolidated statements of income (loss).

47

Fair Value Measurements

Financial instruments for which we did not elect the fair value option include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and

notes receivables, other assets, debt, accounts payable and other liabilities. With the exception of long-term notes receivable
and debt, the carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

We record goodwill when the purchase price of a business acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of net identified
tangible and intangible assets acquired. We do not amortize goodwill or other indefinite lived intangible assets. Instead, we
measure these assets for impairment based on the estimated fair values at least annually or more frequently if impairment
indicators exist. We perform the annual impairment measurement in the fourth quarter of each year. Intangible assets with
finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

In 2017, we sold our remaining owned mineral assets for approximately $85,700,000 and as a result of this sale we
recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $37,900,000 related to the mineral resources reporting unit goodwill which is
included in cost of mineral resources on our consolidated statements of income (loss).

At year-end 2016, we performed our annual goodwill impairment evaluation and concluded that goodwill related to our
central Texas water assets was impaired because the carrying value exceeded the fair value and recorded a $3,874,000 non-
cash impairment charge which is included in cost of other on our consolidated statements of income (loss).

Income Taxes

We provide deferred income taxes using current tax rates for temporary differences between the financial accounting
carrying value of assets and liabilities and their tax accounting carrying values. We recognize and value income tax exposures
for the various taxing jurisdictions where we operate based on laws, elections, commonly accepted tax positions, and
management estimates. We include tax penalties and interest in income tax expense. We provide a valuation allowance for
any deferred tax asset that is not likely to be recoverable in future periods.

When we believe a tax position is supportable but the outcome uncertain, we include the item in our tax return but do not

recognize the related benefit in our provision for taxes. Instead, we record a reserve for unrecognized tax benefits, which
represents our expectation of the most likely outcome considering the technical merits and specific facts of the position.
Changes to liabilities are only made when an event occurs that changes the most likely outcome, such as settlement with the
relevant tax authority, expiration of statutes of limitations, changes in tax law, or recent court rulings.

Property and Equipment

We carry property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation. We capitalize the cost of significant additions

and improvements, and we expense the cost of repairs and maintenance. We capitalize interest costs incurred on major
construction projects. We depreciate these assets using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives as follows:

Estimated
Useful Lives

Buildings and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment

10 to 40 years
2 to 10 years

Less: accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)

$ 2,162
4,513

$ 2,700
4,957

6,675
(4,672)

7,657
(4,541)

$ 2,003

$ 3,116

Depreciation expense of property and equipment was $441,000 in 2017, $889,000 in 2016 and $1,067,000 in 2015.

Real Estate

We carry real estate at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. We capitalize interest costs once development

begins, and we continue to capitalize throughout the development period. We also capitalize infrastructure, improvements,
amenities, and other development costs incurred during the development period. We determine the cost of real estate sold
using the relative sales value method. When we sell real estate from projects that are not finished, we include in the cost of
real estate sold estimates of future development costs through completion, allocated based on relative sales values. These
estimates of future development costs are reevaluated at least annually, with any adjustments being allocated prospectively to
the remaining units available for sale. We receive cash deposits from home builders for purchases of vacant developed lots
from community development projects. These earnest money deposits are released to the home builders as lots are developed
and sold. In certain instances earnest money deposits are subject to mortgages which are secured by the real estate under
contract with the home builder.

48

These mortgages expire when the earnest money is released to the home builders as lots are developed and sold. At year-end
2017, $40,408,000 of real estate was subject to earnest money mortgages, including $25,712,000 classified as assets held for
sale.

We have agreements with utility or improvement districts, principally in Texas, whereby we agree to convey to the
districts water, sewer and other infrastructure-related assets we have constructed in connection with projects within their
jurisdiction. The reimbursement for these assets ranges from 70 to 90 percent of allowable cost as defined by the district. The
transfer is consummated and we receive payment when the districts have a sufficient tax base to support funding of their
bonds. The cost we incur in constructing these assets is included in capitalized development costs, and upon collection, we
remove the assets from capitalized development costs. We provide an allowance to reflect our past experiences in collecting
these reimbursements.

Impairment of Real Estate Long-Lived Assets

We review real estate long-lived assets held for use for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their
carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment exists if the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable
from the undiscounted cash flows expected from its use and eventual disposition. We determine the amount of the impairment
loss by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived asset to its estimated fair value. We generally determine fair value
based on the present value of future cash flows expected from the sale of the long-lived asset. Non-cash impairment charges
related to our owned and consolidated real estate assets are included in cost of real estate sales and other. In 2017, we
recorded $3,420,000 in non-cash impairment charges related to the asset group sold in the strategic asset sale to Starwood and
one mitigation project. In 2016, we recorded $56,453,000 in non-cash impairment charges related to six non-core community
development projects and two multifamily sites.

Reclassifications

In 2017, we have reclassified prior years’ restricted cash that was included in other assets to a separate line item on our

consolidated balance sheets to conform to the current year presentation.

Real Estate Revenue

We recognize revenue from sales of real estate when a sale is consummated, the buyer’s initial investment is adequate,
any receivables are probable of collection, the usual risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer, and
we do not have significant continuing involvement with the real estate sold. If we determine that the earnings process is not
complete, we defer recognition of any gain until earned.

We exclude from revenue amounts we collect from utility or improvement districts related to the conveyance of water,

sewer and other infrastructure related assets. We exclude from revenue amounts we collect from customers that represent
sales tax or other taxes that are based on the sale. These amounts are included in other accrued expenses until paid.

Share-Based Compensation

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options, and a Monte Carlo

simulation pricing model to determine the fair value of market-leveraged stock units and for stock options with market
conditions. The fair value of equity-settled awards is determined on the grant date and the fair value of cash-settled awards is
determined at period end. We expense share-based awards ratably over the vesting period or earlier based on retirement
eligibility.

Owned Mineral Interests

Historically, we leased our mineral interests to third-party exploration and production entities, we retained a royalty
interest and may have taken an additional participation in production, including a working interest. In first quarter 2017, we
sold our remaining owned mineral assets.

Oil and Gas Properties (Discontinued Operations)

We used the successful efforts method of accounting for our oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral

interests leased, costs to drill and complete development of oil and gas wells and related asset retirement costs were
capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells were capitalized pending determination of whether the wells had proved reserves
and if determined incapable of producing commercial quantities of oil and gas these costs were expensed as dry hole costs. At
year-end 2017, we had no capitalized exploratory well costs pending determination of proved reserves. Exploration costs
include dry hole costs, geological and geophysical costs, expired unproved leasehold costs and seismic studies, and were
expensed as incurred. Production costs incurred to maintain wells and related equipment were charged to expense as incurred.

49

Depreciation and depletion of producing oil and gas properties was calculated using the units-of-production method.

Proved developed reserves were used to compute unit rates for unamortized tangible and intangible drilling and completion
costs. Proved reserves were used to compute unit rates for unamortized acquisition of proved leasehold costs. Unit-of-
production amortization rates were revised whenever there was an indication of the need for revision but at least once a year
and those revisions were accounted for prospectively as changes in accounting estimates. We no longer own any oil and gas
working interest properties.

Impairment of Oil and Gas Properties (Discontinued Operations)

Historically, we evaluated our oil and gas properties, including facilities and equipment, for impairment whenever events

or changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. We estimate the expected
undiscounted future cash flows of our oil and gas properties and compared such undiscounted future cash flows to the
carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying amount was recoverable. If the carrying amount
exceeded the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, we adjusted the carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to fair
value. The factors used to determine fair value were subject to our judgment and expertise and included, but were not limited
to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the present value of future cash flows net of estimated operating and
development costs using estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated
capital expenditures, and various discount rates commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with
realizing the expected cash flows projected.

Assessing unproved leasehold properties to determine impairment required significant judgment. We assessed our
unproved leasehold properties periodically for impairment on a property-by-property basis based on remaining lease terms,
drilling results or future plans to develop acreage. Impairment expense for proved and unproved oil and gas properties are
included in cost of mineral resources and cost of oil and gas producing activities in discontinued operations.

Oil and Gas Working Interest Revenues (Discontinued Operations)

We recognized revenue as oil and gas was produced and sold. There were a significant amount of oil and gas properties
which we did not operate and, therefore, revenue was typically recorded in the month of production based on an estimate of
our share of volumes produced and prices realized. We obtained the most current available production data from the operators
and price indices for each well to estimate the accrual of revenue. Obtaining production data on a timely basis for some wells
was not feasible; therefore we utilized past production receipts and estimated sales price information to estimate accrual of
working interest revenue on all other non-operated wells each month. Revisions to such estimates were recorded as actual
results became known.

A majority of our sales were made under contractual arrangements with terms that were considered to be usual and

customary in the oil and gas industry. The contracts were for periods of up to five years with prices determined upon a
percentage of pre-determined and published monthly index price. The terms of these contracts did not have an effect on how
we recognized revenue.

Mineral Resources Revenues

We recognized revenue from mineral bonus payments when we had received an executed agreement with the exploration

company transferring the rights to any oil or gas it may find and requiring drilling be done within a specified period, the
payment had been collected, and we had no obligation to refund the payment. We recognized revenue from delay rentals
received if drilling had not started within the specified period and when the payment had been collected. We recognized
revenue from mineral royalties and non-working interests when the minerals had been delivered to the buyer, the value was
determinable, and we were reasonably sure of collection.

Other Revenues

We recognized revenue from timber sales upon passage of title, which occurred at delivery; when the price was fixed and

determinable; and we were reasonably sure of collection. We recognized revenue from recreational leases on a straight-line
basis over the lease term. We recognize revenue from the sale of water rights or groundwater reservation agreements upon
receipt of an executed agreement, when payment has been collected, all conditions to the agreement have been met and we
have no further performance obligations. Water delivery revenues are recognized as water is delivered and metered at the
delivery point.

50

Note 2 — New and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to
Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, as part of its simplification initiative. The areas for simplification in this update
involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences,
classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. We adopted the
updated standard on January 1, 2017. Effective first quarter 2017, stock-based compensation (SBC) excess tax benefits or
deficiencies are reflected in the consolidated statements of income (loss) as a component of the provision for income taxes,
whereas they previously were recognized in equity to the extent additional paid-in capital pool was available. Additionally,
our consolidated statements of cash flows will now present excess tax benefits as an operating activity, if applicable. Finally,
we have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), requiring an entity

to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes
effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The updated standard becomes
effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Due to our change in fiscal year-end, this
standard is effective for us beginning October 1, 2018. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each
prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect initially applying the
guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). We currently anticipate
adopting the standard using the cumulative catch-up transition method. We anticipate this standard will not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements. While we are continuing to assess all potential impacts of the standard, we
expect revenue related to lot and tract sales to remain substantially unchanged. Due to the complexity of certain of our real
estate sale transactions, the revenue recognition treatment required under the standard will be dependent on contract-specific
terms, and may vary in some instances from recognition at the time of the sale closing.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU requires lessees to put most leases on
their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner that is similar to today’s accounting. This
guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions for all entities. For lessors, the guidance modifies the
classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. This guidance is effective in 2019, and
interim periods within that year. Early adoption is permitted. The new leases standard requires a modified retrospective
transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain
transition relief. We are currently evaluating the effect the updated standard will have on our financial position and
disclosures.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), in order to address eight specific

cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The updated standard is effective for
financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years
with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our earnings,
financial position and disclosures, but we do not expect it to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In November, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230). This ASU requires that a

statement of cash flow explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally
described as restricted cash or restricted cash investments. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 will modify our current disclosures and reclassifications relating to the
consolidated statements of cash flows, but we do not expect it to have a material effect on our consolidated financial
statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), in order to provide
guidance about which changes to terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification
accounting in Topic 718. The updated standard is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our earnings, financial
position and disclosures, but we do not expect it to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 3 — Merger

On October 5, 2017, we merged with a subsidiary of D.R. Horton and we continued as the surviving entity (the

“Merger”). In the Merger, each existing share of our common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time (the “Former Forestar Common Stock”) (except for shares of our common stock that were held by us as treasury shares
or by us or D.R. Horton or our or their respective subsidiaries) were converted into the right to receive, at the election of the

51

holders of such shares of Former Forestar Common Stock, either an amount in cash equal to the Cash Consideration ($17.75
per share) or one new share of our common stock (the “New Forestar Common Stock”), subject to proration procedures
applicable to oversubscription and undersubscription for the Cash Consideration described in the Merger Agreement. The
aggregate amount of Cash Consideration paid by D.R. Horton to holders of Former Forestar Common Stock in the Merger
was $558,256,000. In the Merger, 10,487,873 shares of New Forestar Common Stock (representing 25% of the outstanding
shares of New Forestar Common Stock immediately after the effective time) were issued to the holders of our common stock
and 31,451,063 shares of New Forestar Common Stock (representing 75% of the outstanding share of the New Forestar
Common Stock immediately after the effective time) were issued to D.R. Horton.

Subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time, each equity award made or otherwise denominated

in shares of Former Forestar Common Stock that was outstanding immediately prior to the effective time under our equity
compensation plans was cancelled and of no further force or effect as of the effective time. In exchange for the cancellation of
the equity awards, each holder of such an equity award received from us the Cash Consideration for each share of Former
Forestar Common Stock underlying such equity award (and in the case of equity awards that were stock options or stock
appreciation rights, less the applicable exercise or strike price, but not less than $0), whether or not otherwise vested as of the
effective time. With respect to any of our market-leveraged stock units, the number of shares of Former Forestar Common
Stock subject to such equity awards were determined pursuant to the terms set forth in the applicable award agreements and
based on a per share value equal to $17.75.

In connection with merger activities, we incurred $43,819,000 in transaction costs in 2017, of which, $41,475,000 are
included in general and administrative expenses and $2,344,000 in other operating expenses on our consolidated statements of
income (loss). These costs include a $20,000,000 merger termination fee paid to Starwood Capital Group, $7,683,000 in
executive severance and change in control costs, $7,170,000 in transaction and other fees paid to our financial advisor,
$4,617,000 in professional services and other costs and $4,349,000 related to the acceleration of vesting and settlement of
equity awards.

Note 4 — Real Estate

Real estate consists of:

Entitled, developed and under development projects . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
Other real estate costs (principally land in entitlement in 2016)

$127,442
2,938

$263,859
29,144

$130,380

$293,003

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Our estimated reimbursements from utility and improvement districts included in real estate were $9,775,000 at year-end
2017 and $45,157,000 at year-end 2016, which included $14,749,000 related to our Cibolo Canyons project near San Antonio.
In 2017, we collected $19,606,000 in reimbursements that were previously submitted to these districts. These costs are
principally for water, sewer and other infrastructure assets that we have incurred and submitted or will submit to utility or
improvement districts for approval and reimbursement. We expect to be reimbursed by utility and improvement districts when
these districts achieve adequate tax basis or otherwise have funds available to support payment. At year-end 2017, estimated
reimbursements of $27,915,000, which include $14,127,000 related to Cibolo Canyons, are classified as assets held for sale.
Please read Note 22 — Subsequent Event for additional information regarding our strategic asset sale to Starwood.

In 2017, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $3,420,000 related to the asset group sold in the strategic asset
sale to Starwood and one non-core mitigation project. In 2016, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $56,453,000
related to six non-core community development projects and two multifamily sites. These impairments were a result of our
key initiative to review our entire portfolio of assets which resulted in business plan changes, inclusive of cash tax savings
considerations, to market these properties for sale, which resulted in adjustment of the carrying value to fair value.

In 2017, we sold over 19,000 acres of timberland and undeveloped land in Georgia and Texas for $46,197,000 generating

combined net proceeds of $45,396,000. These transactions resulted in a gain on sale of assets of $28,674,000.

In 2016, we sold the Radisson Hotel & Suites, a 413 room hotel in Austin, for $130,000,000, generating $128,764,000 in

net proceeds before paying in full the associated debt of $15,400,000 and recognized a gain on sale of $95,336,000. We also
sold Eleven, a wholly-owned 257-unit multifamily property in Austin, for $60,150,000, generating $59,719,000 in net
proceeds before paying in full the associated debt of $23,936,000 and recognized a gain on sale of $9,116,000. In addition, we
sold Dillon, a planned 379-unit multifamily property that was under construction in Charlotte, for $25,979,000, generating
$25,428,000 in net proceeds and recognized a gain on sale of $1,223,000, and Music Row, a planned 230-unit multifamily

52

property that was under construction in Nashville, for $15,025,000, generating $14,703,000 in net proceeds and recognized a
gain on sale of $3,968,000. We also sold Downtown Edge, a multifamily site in Austin, for $5,000,000, generating $4,975,000
in net proceeds and recognized a loss of $3,870,000.

In 2016, we sold over 58,300 acres of timberland and undeveloped land in Georgia and Alabama for $104,172,000

generating net proceeds of $103,238,000. These transactions resulted in a gain on sale of assets of $48,891,000.

Depreciation expense related to commercial and income producing properties was $0 in 2017, $816,000 in 2016 and

$6,810,000 in 2015 and is included in other operating expense.

We provided a performance bond and standby letter of credit in support of a bond issuance by CCSID. In 2014, we
received $50,550,000 from CCSID principally related to its issuance of $48,900,000 Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) and Sales
and Use Tax Revenue Bonds. These bonds are obligations solely of CCSID and are payable from HOT and sales and use
taxes levied by CCSID. To facilitate the issuance of the bonds, we provided a $6,846,000 letter of credit to the bond trustee as
security for certain debt service fund obligations in the event CCSID tax collections are not sufficient to support payment of
the bonds in accordance with their terms. The letter of credit must be maintained until the earlier of redemption of the bonds
or scheduled bond maturity in 2034. We also entered into an agreement with the owner of the Resort to assign its senior rights
to us in exchange for consideration provided by us, including a surety bond to be drawn if CCSID tax collections are not
sufficient to support ad valorem tax rebates payable. The surety bond decreases as CCSID makes annual ad valorem tax rebate
payments, which obligation is scheduled to be retired in full by 2020. At year-end 2017, the surety bond was $5,312,000. Our
rights to receive the excess HOT and sales taxes from CCSID was excluded from the strategic asset sale to Starwood.

Note 5 — Investment in Unconsolidated Ventures

We participate in real estate ventures for the purpose of acquiring and developing residential, multifamily and mixed-use
communities in which we may or may not have a controlling financial interest. U.S. GAAP requires consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (VIEs) in which an enterprise has a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary. A controlling
financial interest will have both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the VIE activities that most
significantly impact economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb the VIE losses and right to receive benefits that
are significant to the VIE. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining whether a venture is a VIE and
whether we are the primary beneficiary. We perform this review initially at the time we enter into venture agreements and
reassess upon reconsideration events.

At year-end 2017, we had ownership interests in 15 ventures that we accounted for using the equity method, none of

which are a VIE.

Combined summarized balance sheet information for our ventures accounted for using the equity method follows:

Venture Assets Venture Borrowings (a) Venture Equity

Our Investment

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

(In thousands)

At Year-End

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,525 $ 26,503 $ — $

242, LLC (b) (e)
CL Ashton Woods, LP (c)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CL Realty, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CREA FMF Nashville LLC (b)
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Elan 99, LLC (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FMF Littleton LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FMF Peakview LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FOR/SR Forsyth LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HM Stonewall Estates, Ltd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LM Land Holdings, LP (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MRECV DT Holdings LLC (e)
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
MRECV Edelweiss LLC/MRECV Lender VIII
LLC (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MRECV Juniper Ridge LLC (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MRECV Meadow Crossing II LLC (e)
. . . . . . .
Miramonte Boulder Pass, LLC (e)
. . . . . . . . . . .
Temco Associates, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

124
4,528
2,315
49,080
66,849
—
11,598
—
19,479
3,043

8,127
3,936
3,129
7,573
4,448
—

2,653
8,048
56,081
49,652
70,282
—
10,672
852
25,538
4,155

3,484
4,156
2,492
10,738
4,368
—

83
2,172
342

—
—
—
—
— 37,446
36,238
44,446
—
1,568
—
3,477
—

1,107 $ 19,357 $ 23,136 $ 9,131 $10,934
1,107
2,198
3,950
7,899
17,091
4,923
13,100 10,078 11,790
6,128
5,144
23,798
—
—
—
8,091
9,037
8,990
— 477
852
9,685
20,945
3,729
4,144

104
4,344
684
11,204
20,289
—
10,041
—
12,074
3,043

5,935
2,594

36,348
45,836
—
1,551
—
—
—

—
—
—
1,398
—
—

—
—
—
4,006
—
—

8,127
3,936
3,129
4,843
4,345
—

3,484
4,156
2,491
5,265
4,253
—

7,189
3,331
2,738
4,633
2,172
—

3,358
3,741
2,242
5,330
2,126
—

$203,754 $279,674 $85,133 $128,288 $105,520 $141,802 $64,579 $77,611

53

Combined summarized income statement information for our ventures accounted for using the equity method

follows:

Revenues

Earnings (Loss)

Our Share of Earnings (Loss)

2017

2016

2015

2017

For the Year

2016
(In thousands)

2015

2017

2016

2015

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,073 $ 5,835 $ 20,995 $ 8,021 $ 1,259 $ 9,588 $ 4,096 $

242, LLC (b) (e)
CL Ashton Woods, LP . . . . . . . . . . .
CL Realty, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CREA FMF Nashville LLC (b) (d) . . . .
Elan 99, LLC (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FMF Littleton LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FMF Peakview LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FOR/SR Forsyth LLC . . . . . . . . . . . .
HM Stonewall Estates, Ltd. . . . . . . . .
LM Land Holdings, LP (c)
MRECV DT Holdings LLC (e)
MRECV Edelweiss LLC/MRECV

2,870
567
4,955
1,392
3,116
939
—
2,112
. . . . . . . . . 22,127 10,001
495

3,179
499
5,440
4,596
6,366
—
—
496

1,196

. . . . .

9,820

914
237

1,456
856 (1,155)

3,881
424
1,227 17,267 (1,420) (1,696)
(49)
— (1,896) (2,739)
192
(367)
(571)
— (248) (1,116)
—
(65)
1,881
832
8,251
7,288
167
477

— (148)
3,990
243
10,956 10,629
— 1,173

120
2,057

1,816
(578)
7,563
(1,712)
48
—
(134)
103
3,563
911

668 $ 4,919
5,000
212
(1,696)
(44)
(92)
(223)
—
952
3,342
—

1,332
119
1,103
(2,465)
(143)
(50)
(58)
361
2,458
429

Lender VIII LLC (e) . . . . . . . . . . . .
MRECV Juniper Ridge LLC (e) . . . . .
MRECV Meadow Crossing II LLC (e)
. . .
Miramonte Boulder Pass, LLC (e)
PSW Communities, LP . . . . . . . . . . .
TEMCO Associates, LLC . . . . . . . . .
Other ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

416
379
267
4,923

1,018
1,445
638
5,483
—
192
1,344
— 6,519

151
— 1,016
106
— 1,445
—
638
—
(250)
177
—
— 2,688
—
— 29,986
92
9,485
2,358
440
— 2,105 33,303
36,237

409
380
220
(399)

368
342
198
(200)

789
1,089
496
(197)
—
46
220
— 1,441

137
—
—
(125)
— 1,169
1,179
1,278

$65,748 $46,130 $125,729 $39,150 $ 9,119 $59,320 $17,899 $ 6,123 $16,008

(a)

(b)

(c)

Total includes current maturities of $84,098,000 at year-end 2017, of which $79,515,000 is non-recourse to us,
and $89,756,000 at year-end 2016, of which $78,557,000 is non-recourse to us.
Includes unamortized deferred gains on real estate contributed by us to ventures. We recognize deferred gains as
income as real estate is sold to third parties. Deferred gains of $548,000 are reflected as a reduction to our
investment in unconsolidated ventures at year-end 2017.
Includes unrecognized basis difference of $448,000 which is reflected as an increase of our investment in
unconsolidated ventures at year-end 2017. This difference will be amortized as expense over the life of the
investment and included in our share of earnings (loss) from the respective venture.

(d) Our share of venture earnings in 2016 includes reallocation of prior year cumulative losses incurred by the venture
as a result of equity contribution by the venture partner in 2016 in accordance with the partnership agreement.
Included in our strategic asset sale to Starwood on February 8, 2018. Please read Note 22 — Subsequent Event
for additional information regarding this transaction.

(e)

In 2017, we invested $4,548,000 in these ventures and received $34,439,000 in distributions; in 2016, we invested
$6,089,000 in these ventures and received $13,419,000 in distributions; and in 2015, we invested $26,349,000 in these
ventures and received $24,909,000 in distributions. Distributions include both return of investments and distributions
of earnings.

In 2017, CREA FMF Nashville LLC (Acklen), sold a 320-unit multifamily project in Nashville for $71,750,000

and recognized a gain of $18,986,000. Our share of earnings was $7,783,000 and we received a distribution of
$11,956,000 as a result of this sale.

In 2017, venture earnings from 242, LLC benefited from the sale of 46 commercial acres for $9,719,000
generating $6,612,000 in earnings to the venture. Based on our 50% interest in the venture, our pro-rata share of the
earnings associated with this sale was $3,306,000 and our pro-rata share of the total distributable cash was $4,348,000.

In 2017, CL Realty, LLC, a venture in which we own a 50% interest, sold certain mineral assets to us for

$2,400,000. Subsequent to closing of this transaction, we received $1,200,000 from the venture, representing our pro-
rata share of distributable cash. In 2017, the venture recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $3,756,000 associated
with a commercial tract on the Texas coast.

54

In 2016, we sold our interest in FMF Peakview LLC (3600), a 304-unit multifamily joint venture near Denver, generating

$13,917,000 in net proceeds and recognized a gain of $10,363,000 which is included in gain on sale of assets.

We provided construction and development services for some of these ventures for which we receive fees. Fees for these

services were $741,000 in 2017, $2,466,000 in 2016 and $1,856,000 in 2015, and are included in real estate revenues.

Note 6 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets follows:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill
Identified intangibles, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)
$ — $37,900
—
448

$448

$37,900

Goodwill related to our mineral assets was $0 at year-end 2017 and $37,900,000 at year-end 2016. In 2017, we

recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $37,900,000 related to goodwill attributable to our mineral resources reporting
unit as a result of selling our remaining owned mineral assets. In 2016, we recognized a goodwill non-cash impairment charge
of $3,874,000 related to interests in groundwater leases in central Texas. Impairment charges are included in cost of mineral
resources and cost of other on our consolidated statements of income (loss).

Identified intangibles, net represent indefinite lived groundwater leases associated with our central Texas water assets at

year-end 2017 and were included in assets held for sale at year-end 2016. In 2017, we recognized a non-cash impairment
charge of $1,233,000 related to the indefinite lived groundwater leases. Impairment charges are included in cost of other on
our consolidated statements of income (loss).

Note 7 — Held for Sale

At year-end 2017, assets held for sale principally included certain real estate projects sold on February 8, 2018, and water
wells related to our nonparticipating royalty interests in water rights located in east Texas. Please read Note 22 — Subsequent
Event for additional information regarding our strategic asset sale to Starwood.

The major classes of assets and liabilities held for sale were as follows:

Assets Held for Sale:
Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Timber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas properties and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Liabilities Held for Sale:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)

$180,247
—
—
—
1,360

$19,931
1,682
1,681
782
6,301

$181,607

$30,377

1,017
—

$

1,017

$

—
103

103

Note 8 — Discontinued Operations

We have divested all of our oil and gas working interest properties. As a result of this significant change in our

operations, we have reported the results of operations and financial position of these assets as discontinued operations within
the consolidated statements of income (loss) and consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented.

55

Summarized results from discontinued operations were as follows:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of oil and gas producing activities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

15
(52)
226

$ 5,862
(6,578)
(7,754)

$ 43,845
(221,402)
(10,363)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain (loss) on sale of assets before income taxes . . . . .
Income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

189
(197)
46,039

$ (8,470)
(13,664)
5,269

$(187,920)
(706)
2,496

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net

of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$46,031

$(16,865)

$(186,130)

In third quarter 2017, we sold the common stock of Forestar Petroleum Corporation for $100,000. This
transaction completed the sale of all our oil and gas assets and related entities. This transaction resulted in a
significant tax loss, and the corresponding tax benefit is reported in discontinued operations in 2017.

In 2016, we recorded a net loss of $13,664,000 on the sale of 199,263 net mineral acres leased from others
and 379 gross (95 net) producing oil and gas working interest wells in Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and North
Dakota for total net proceeds of $80,374,000, which includes $3,269,000 in reimbursement of capital costs
incurred on in-progress wells that were assumed by the buyer. Other operating expenses in 2017 include a benefit
of $1,043,000 due to a reduction of an accrual resulting from a change in estimate related to potential
environmental liabilities to plug and abandon certain oil and gas wells in Wyoming. Other operating expenses in
2016 include loss contingency charges of $2,990,000 related to litigation and $1,155,000 related to potential
environmental liabilities to plug and abandon certain oil and gas wells in Wyoming.

In 2015, we recorded a net loss of $706,000 on the sale of 109,000 net mineral acres leased from others and

the disposition of 39 gross (7 net) producing oil and gas wells in Nebraska, Texas, Colorado, North Dakota and
Oklahoma for total net proceeds of $17,800,000.

Cost of sales includes non-cash impairment charges of $0 in 2017, $612,000 in 2016 and $163,029,000 in

2015 related to our proved properties and unproved leasehold oil and gas working interests.

The major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations at year-end 2017 and 2016 are as

follows:

At Year-End
2016

2017

(In thousands)

Assets of Discontinued Operations:

Receivables, net of allowance for bad debt . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $
—

6
8

$— $

14

Liabilities of Discontinued Operations:

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $
—

67
5,228

$— $5,295

56

Cash (used in) or provided by operating activities and investing activities of discontinued operations are as follows:

Operating activities:

Asset impairments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in accounts payable and other accrued

liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dry hole and unproved leasehold impairment charges . .
Loss (gain) on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . .

Investing activities:

Oil and gas properties and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sales of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

$ — $

612

$105,337

(3,000)
—
197
—
$(2,803)

—
—
13,664
2,202
$16,478

—
67,639
706
28,391
$202,073

$ — $ (579)
77,105
$76,526

200
200

$

$ (49,717)
17,800
$ (31,917)

Note 9 — Receivables

Receivables consist of:

Other receivables and accrued interest
Loans secured by real estate, average interest rate of 5.40% at

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

year-end 2017 and 4.94% at year-end 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Allowance for bad debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)
2,557

1,505

3,776
6,333
(26)
$6,307

7,452
8,957
(26)
$8,931

Other loans secured by real estate generally are secured by a deed of trust and due within three to five years.

Note 10 — Debt

Debt consists of:

8.50% senior secured notes due 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.75% convertible senior notes due 2020, net of discount
. . .
Other indebtedness due through 2018 at variable and fixed

interest rates ranging from 5.0% to 5.50% . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)

—
108,139

5,200
104,673

290
$108,429

485
$110,358

Letter of Credit Facility

On October 5, 2017, we entered into a Letter of Credit Facility Agreement providing for a $30,000,000 secured
standby letter of credit facility (the “LC Facility”). The LC Facility is secured by $30,000,000 in cash deposited with
the administrative agent. In addition, we have $10,000,000 on deposit with a participating lender. The total of these two
deposits are classified as restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheets. At year-end 2017, $14,072,000 was
outstanding under the LC Facility.

Termination of Senior Credit Facility

On October 5, 2017, in connection with entry into the LC Facility, we terminated our existing senior credit facility

(the “Prior Credit Facility”). The Prior Credit Facility provided for a $50,000,000 revolving line of credit that was
scheduled to mature on May 15, 2018. This Prior Credit Facility could be prepaid at any time without penalty and
included a $50,000,000 sublimit for letters of credit. All outstanding letters of credit at the time of termination were
transferred to the new LC Facility.

57

8.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2022

On October 30, 2017, we redeemed the remaining $5,315,000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding

8.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “Notes”). The Notes were redeemed for $5,928,000 and the
redemption resulted in a $524,000 loss on extinguishment of debt.

In 2016, we completed a cash tender offer for our Notes, pursuant to which we purchased $215,495,000
principal amount of the outstanding Notes. Total consideration paid was $245,604,000, which included $29,091,000
in premium and $1,018,000 in accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we received consent from holders of the
Notes to eliminate or modify certain covenants, events of default and other provisions contained in the indenture
governing the Notes, and to release the subsidiary guarantees and collateral securing the Notes. We also purchased
$9,750,000 principal amount of the Notes in open market transactions. The cash tender offer and open market
purchases resulted in a $35,681,000 loss on extinguishment of debt, which included the premium paid to repurchase
the Notes, write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs of $5,416,000 and $1,301,000 in other costs.

3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020

In 2013, we issued $125,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020

(Convertible Notes). Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semiannually at a rate of 3.75 percent per annum
and they mature on March 1, 2020. The Convertible Notes had an initial conversion rate of 40.8351 per $1,000
principal amount. The initial conversion rate was subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events. Prior
to November 1, 2019, the Convertible Notes are convertible only upon certain circumstances, and thereafter are
convertible at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day prior to maturity.

On October 5, 2017, we had $120,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes outstanding. In

connection with the consummation of the Merger, we entered into a Third Supplemental Indenture (together with the base
indenture and the prior supplemental indentures, the “Indenture”) to the Indenture relating to our Convertible Notes.

Pursuant to the Third Supplemental Indenture, the Convertible Notes are no longer convertible into shares of

our pre-merger common stock (“Former Forestar Common Stock”) and instead are convertible into cash and
shares of our post-merger common stock (“New Forestar Common Stock”) based on the per-share weighted
average of the cash and shares of New Forestar Common Stock received by our stockholders that affirmatively
made an election in connection with the Merger. As a result of such elections, for each share of Former Forestar
Common Stock a holder of Convertible Notes was previously entitled to receive upon conversion of Convertible
Notes, such holder is instead entitled to receive $579.77062 in cash and 8.17192 shares of New Forestar
Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes surrendered for conversion.

The completion of the Merger constituted a Fundamental Change, as defined in the Indenture. On

October 12, 2017, in accordance with the Indenture, we gave notice of the Fundamental Change to holders of the
Convertible Notes and made an offer to purchase (a “Fundamental Change Offer”) all or any part (equal to
$1,000 or an integral multiple of $1,000) of every holder’s Convertible Notes. Under this offer, we repurchased
$1,077,000 of Notes, and recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87,000.

At year-end 2017, unamortized debt discount of our Convertible Notes was $9,726,000. The effective
interest rate on the liability component was 8 percent and the carrying amount of the equity component was
$16,847,000. We intend to settle the principal amount of Convertible Notes in cash upon conversion, with any
excess conversion value to be settled in shares of our common stock.

In 2016, we purchased $5,000,000 of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 at 93.25 percent of face value

in open market transactions for $4,663,000 and we allocated $4,452,000 to extinguish the debt and $211,000 to
reacquire the equity component within the convertible notes based on the fair value of the debt component. We
recognized a $110,000 loss on extinguishment of debt based on the difference between the fair value of the debt
component prior to conversion and the carrying value of the debt component. Total loss on extinguishment of debt
including write-off of debt issuance costs allocated to the repurchased notes was $183,000.

Deferred Fees and Debt Maturities

At year-end 2017 and 2016, we have $1,058,000 and $1,633,000 in unamortized deferred fees which were
deducted from our debt. Amortization of deferred financing fees was $979,000 in 2017, $3,598,000 in 2016 and
$4,002,000 in 2015 and is included in interest expense.

Debt maturities during the next five years are: 2018 — $290,000; 2019 — $0; 2020 — $108,139,000;

2021 — $0; 2022 — $0 and thereafter — $0.

58

Note 11 — Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an

orderly transaction between market participants. In arriving at a fair value measurement, we use a fair value
hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last
unobservable. The three levels of inputs used to establish fair value are the following:
• Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
• Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that
are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets or liabilities; and

• Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are

significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

We elected not to use the fair value option for cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable,
other assets, debt, accounts payable and other liabilities. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments
approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature or variable interest rates. We determine the fair value
of fixed rate financial instruments using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets.

Information about our fixed rate financial instruments not measured at fair value follows:

Year-End 2017

Year-End 2016

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Valuation
Technique

Fixed rate debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(In thousands)
$(109,197) $(109,114) $(111,506) $(109,789) Level 2
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include real estate assets, assets held for

sale, goodwill and intangible assets, which are measured for impairment.

In 2017, we recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $37,900,000 related to goodwill attributable to our

mineral resources reporting unit as a result of selling our remaining owned mineral assets. We recognized non-
cash impairment charges of $5,852,000 related to our non-core water assets in central Texas and Georgia and
$420,000 related to a non-core mitigation project in Georgia. We also recorded a non-cash impairment charge of
$3,000,000 related to the asset group to be disposed of in the strategic asset sale to Starwood on February 8,
2018. We based the valuations of our water assets and mitigation project primarily on past and current
negotiations with expected buyers.

In 2016, we recognized non-cash impairment charges of $56,453,000 related to six non-core community

development projects and two multifamily sites as a result of the review of our entire portfolio of assets and marketing
these properties for sale, of which four non-core community development projects and one multifamily site were sold
in 2016. We based our valuations primarily on executed purchase and sale agreements, current negotiations and letters
of intent with expected buyers and third party broker price opinions. In 2016, we recognized non-cash impairment
charges of $612,000 related to non-core oil and gas working interest properties that were sold in 2016.

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are as follows:

Year-End 2017

Year-End 2016

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

(In thousands)

Non-financial Assets and Liabilities:
Real estate held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $— $180,247
Central Texas water assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $—

$— $180,247 $— $— $— $—
$1,987 $— $— $— $—

$— $1,987

Note 12 — Capital Stock

On October 5, 2017, our stockholders received New Forestar Common Stock in connection with the Merger.

Please see Note 3 — Merger for additional information.

On December 15, 2016, we issued 7,857,000 shares of our common stock upon settlement of the stock
purchase contract related to the 6.00% tangible equity units. In 2016, we repurchased 283,976 shares of our
common stock for $3,537,000. We have repurchased 3,777,308 shares of our common stock for $57,696,000
since we announced our 2009 strategic initiative of repurchasing up to 20 percent or up to 7,000,000 shares of

59

our common stock. The foregoing purchase authorization terminated upon closing of the Merger with D.R.
Horton on October 5, 2017.

Note 13 — Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed using the treasury stock method in 2017 and the
two-class method for 2016 and 2015. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines net
income per share for each class of common stock and participating security. We previously determined that our
6.00% tangible equity units issued in 2013 were participating securities. Per share amounts are computed by
dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during each
period. In periods with a net loss, no such adjustment is made to earnings as the holders of the participating
securities have no obligation to fund losses.

The computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are as follows:

Numerator:

Continuing operations
Net income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Net (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Earnings (loss) available for diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: Undistributed net income from continuing operations allocated
to participating securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations available to common

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

$ 6,301
(2,078)

$ 77,044 $ (26,241)
(676)

(1,531)

$ 4,223

$ 75,513 $ (26,917)

— (13,493)

—

shareholders for basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,223

$ 62,020 $ (26,917)

Discontinued operations
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations available for diluted earnings

per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,031

(16,865)

(186,130)

Less: Undistributed net income from discontinued operations allocated to

participating securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

3,014

—

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations available to common

shareholders for basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,031

(13,851)

(186,130)

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average common shares upon conversion of participating

securities (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock and equity-settled awards . . . .
Total weighted average shares outstanding — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

42,143

34,546

34,266

—
238
42,381

7,515
273
42,334

—
—
34,266

Anti-dilutive awards excluded from diluted weighted average shares

outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,093

2,102

10,864

(a) Our earnings per share calculation reflects the weighted average shares issuable upon settlement of the

prepaid stock purchase contract component of our 6.00% tangible equity units.

On December 15, 2016, we issued 7,857,000 shares of our common stock upon settlement of the stock

purchase contract related to the 6.00% tangible equity units.

We intend to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in cash upon conversion with any excess
conversion value to be settled in shares of our common stock. Therefore, only the amount in excess of the par value
of the Convertible Notes will be included in our calculation of diluted net income per share using the treasury stock
method. As such, the Convertible Notes have no impact on diluted net income per share until the price of our
common stock exceeds the conversion price of the Convertible Notes of $51.42. The price of our common stock in
2017 did not exceed the conversion price which resulted in no additional diluted outstanding shares.

60

Note 14 — Income Taxes

Income tax expense from continuing operations consists of:

Current tax provision:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Federal
State and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred tax provision:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Federal
State and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2017

For the Year

2016
(In thousands)

2015

$(44,177)
(3,378)

$(15,089)
(1,520)

$ 6,740
(418)

(47,555)

(16,609)

6,322

1,678
57

1,735

1,382
(75)

1,307

(38,262)
(3,191)

(41,453)

Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(45,820)

$(15,302)

$(35,131)

A reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to the effective income tax rate on continuing operations

follows:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

35% 35% 35%
Federal statutory rate (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
3
State, net of federal benefit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(19)
(42)
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
40
Tax rate change due to new tax act
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1)
Noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1)
2
Installment sale ace adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
—
11
Stock based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
25
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
Merger costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
18
—
Oil and gas percentage depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
(1) —
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10
348
—
(3)
—
5
—
—
(1)
1

Effective tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

88% 17% 395%

The effective tax rate for all years includes an expense for state income taxes and non-deductible expenses,

reduced by a tax benefit related to noncontrolling interests. The effective tax rate for 2017 also includes an
expense for non-deductible goodwill related to the sale of our owned mineral assets and non-deductible
transaction costs related to the Merger with D.R. Horton. Other 2017 differences, including the remeasurement of
our deferred tax assets and liabilities as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”), are fully offset by a
change in our valuation allowance. The effective tax rate for 2016 includes a change in valuation allowance due
to a decrease in our deferred tax assets. The effective rate for 2015 includes the establishment of a valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets.

61

Significant components of deferred taxes are:

Deferred Tax Assets:

Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AMT credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income producing properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas percentage depletion carryforwards . . . . . . . .
Accruals not deductible until paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax asset net of valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred Tax Liabilities:

Undeveloped land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Convertible debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Timber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)

$ 37,513
1,510
2,305
—
1,690
794
—
196
44,008
(39,578)
4,430

—
(2,402)
—
(2,402)
$ 2,028

$ 50,759
13,185
2,804
1,672
5,900
2,055
3,478
552
80,405
(73,405)
7,000

(1,359)
(5,035)
(283)
(6,677)
323

$

The Tax Act was enacted on December 22, 2017, and reduced the federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21

percent for all corporations effective January 1, 2018. ASC 740 requires companies to reflect the effects of a tax law
change in the period in which the law is enacted. Accordingly, we have remeasured our deferred tax assets and liabilities
along with the corresponding valuation allowance as of the enactment date. This remeasurement resulted in no additional
tax expense or benefit except for the release of a portion of the valuation allowance for AMT credits which become fully
refundable in future years as a result of the tax law change. We have determined based on current available information
that no other tax law changes as a result of the Tax Act have a significant impact on our 2017 tax expense. The
adjustment to the deferred tax accounts and our determination that no other tax law changes have a significant impact on
our 2017 tax expense are our best estimate based on the information available at this time and may change as additional
information, such as regulatory guidance, becomes available. Adjustments to estimated amounts, if any, would be
reflected as a discrete expense or benefit in the quarter that it is identified, as allowed by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 118.

On October 5, 2017, D.R. Horton acquired 75 percent of our common stock resulting in an ownership change
under Section 382. Section 382 limits our ability to use certain tax attributes and built-in losses and deductions in a
given year. Any tax attributes or built-in losses and deductions that are limited in the current year are expected to be
fully utilized in future years.

At year-end 2017, we had approximately $9,200,000 and $69,200,000 of federal and state net operating loss

carryforwards, which include certain recognized built-in losses that are deferred under Section 382. These
carryforwards are subject to a full valuation allowance and $45,600,000 of the state carryforwards are attributable to
states in which we are not currently doing business due to our exit from the oil and gas business. If not utilized, the
federal carryforwards will expire in 2037 and the state carryforwards will expire in 2020 to 2037. We had
approximately $1,690,000 of AMT credit carryforwards which are refundable over the next four years if not used to
offset current taxes.

At year-end 2017 and 2016, we have provided a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset of $39,578,000 and
$73,405,000 for the portion of the deferred tax asset that is more likely than not to be unrealizable. The decrease in the
valuation allowance for the year was primarily attributable to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities as
a result of the tax rate decrease from the Tax Act.

In determining our valuation allowance, we assessed available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether
sufficient future taxable income would be generated to permit use of the existing deferred tax asset. A significant piece
of objective evidence was the cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended December 31, 2017,
principally driven by impairments of oil and gas and real estate assets. Such evidence limited our ability to consider
other subjective evidence, such as our projected future taxable income.

The amount of deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted if negative evidence in the form of
cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight is given to subjective evidence, such as our projected
future taxable income.

62

We file income tax returns in the U.S. and in various state jurisdictions. All federal statutes of limitations for tax

years prior to 2012 are closed. As a result of filing refund claims for the 2012 through 2014 tax years for carrybacks
from the 2015 tax year, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) initiated and completed an audit of our 2012 through
2015 tax years during 2017 resulting in no change to our tax liability. As a result, the IRS cannot re-open the 2012
through 2015 tax years for audit unless they identify an issue that meets the criteria for re-opening an audit under
Section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2005-32. We believe there are no such issues in our 2012 through 2015 tax years that meet this
criteria and, therefore, we believe the IRS will not re-open our 2012 through 2015 tax years for audit. We are no longer
subject to state income tax examinations before 2013.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of tax benefits not recognized for book purposes is as follows:

At Year-End

(In thousands)

2017

2016

2015

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases (decreases) for tax positions of current year . . .
Decreases for dispositions and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,499
—
(1,449)

$ — $—
—
2,499
—
—

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,050

$2,499

$—

If the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits were recognized at year-end 2017, it would result in a $1,050,000

deferred tax asset and a corresponding tax benefit.

We recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. In 2017, 2016 and
2015, we recognized no interest related to unrecognized tax benefits. At year-end 2017 and 2016, we had no accrued
interest or penalties.

Note 15 — Litigation and Environmental Contingencies
Litigation

We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business and
believe that adequate reserves have been established for any probable losses. We do not believe that the outcome of any
of these proceedings should have a significant adverse effect on our financial position, long-term results of operations
or cash flows. It is possible, however, that charges related to these matters could be significant to our results or cash
flows in any one accounting period.
Environmental

Environmental remediation liabilities arise from time to time in the ordinary course of doing business, and we
believe we have established adequate reserves for any probable losses that we can reasonably estimate. In 2016, we
sold all but 25 of our 289 acres near Antioch, California, approximately 80 acres of which had not yet received a
certificate of completion under the voluntary remediation program in which we were participating. The buyer of the
former paper manufacturing sites assumed responsibility for environmental, remediation and monitoring activities,
subject to limited exclusions, and obtained a $20,000,000, ten year pollution legal liability insurance policy naming us
as an additional insured.

With the sale of our remaining oil and gas entities in third quarter 2017 we no longer have asset retirement
obligations related to the abandonment and site restoration requirements that result from the acquisition, construction
and development of oil and gas properties. At year-end 2016, we had accrued $1,155,000 related to potential
environmental liabilities to plug and abandon certain oil and gas wells in Wyoming which is included in liabilities of
discontinued operations.

Note 16 — Commitments and Other Contingencies

We lease facilities and equipment under non-cancelable long-term operating lease agreements. In addition, we
have various obligations under other office space and equipment leases of less than one year. Rent expense on facilities
and equipment, including amounts recorded as discontinued operations, was $2,101,000 in 2017, $1,923,000 in 2016
and $3,872,000 in 2015. Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases having an initial
or remaining term in excess of one year are: 2018 — $1,313,000; 2019 — $208,000; 2020 — $180,000; 2021 —
$61,000; 2022 — $0; and thereafter —$0.

We lease office space in Austin, Texas, as our corporate headquarters and in other locations in support of our

business operations. The total remaining contractual obligations for these leases is $1,762,000.

In support of our core community development business, we have a $40,000,000 surety bond program that
provides financial assurance to beneficiaries related to execution and performance of our land development business.
At year-end 2017, there were $14,708,000 outstanding under this program.

63

Note 17 — Segment Information

We manage our operations through three business segments: real estate, mineral resources and other. Real
estate secures entitlements and develops infrastructure on our lands for single-family residential and mixed-use
communities, and manages our undeveloped land, commercial and income producing properties. Mineral resources
managed our owned mineral assets. Other managed our timber, recreational leases and water resource assets.

We have divested all of our oil and gas working interest properties. As a result of this significant change in
our operations, we have reported the results of operations and financial position of these assets as discontinued
operations for all periods presented. In addition, we changed the name of the oil and gas segment to mineral
resources to reflect the strategic shift from oil and gas working interest investments to owned mineral interests.
We also changed the name of the other natural resources segment to other.

We evaluate performance based on segment earnings (loss) before unallocated items and income taxes.
Segment earnings (loss) consist of operating income, equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated ventures, gain
on sales of assets, interest income on loans secured by real estate and net (income) loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests. Items not allocated to our business segments consist of general and administrative
expense, share-based and long-term incentive compensation, gain on sale of strategic timberland, interest
expense, loss on extinguishment of debt and other corporate non-operating income and expense. The accounting
policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies. Our revenues are derived from our U.S. operations and all of our assets are located in the U.S. In 2017,
one homebuilder accounted for $20,923,000 of our total real estate segment revenues. In 2016 and 2015, no
single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of our total revenues, other than the customer associated
with the sale of our Midtown Cedar Hill multifamily project in 2015.

For the year or at year-end 2017

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . .
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing
operations attributable to Forestar Group
Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the year or at year-end 2016

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . .
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing
operations attributable to Forestar Group
Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the year or at year-end 2015

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion and amortization . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . .
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing
operations attributable to Forestar Group
Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Real
Estate

Mineral
Resources

Other

Items Not
Allocated to
Segments

Total

(In thousands)

$112,746
131
16,500

$ 1,502
28
1,395

$

74
25
4

$

— $114,322
5,463
17,899

5,279
—

47,281
386,222
64,579
52

45,552
—
—
2,400

(6,393)
3,346
—
—

(36,397) (a)
372,344
—
—

50,043
761,912
64,579
2,452

$190,273
976
5,778

$ 5,076
145
173

$ 1,965
352
172

$

— $197,314
9,245
6,123

7,772
—

121,420
403,062
77,611
5,783

3,327
38,907
—
—

(4,625)
11,531
—
299

(29,307) (a)
279,694
—
56

90,815
733,194
77,611
6,138

$202,830
7,605
15,582

$ 9,094
383
275

$ 6,652
540
151

$

— $218,576
16,694
16,008

8,166
—

67,678
82,453
13,644

4,230
—
59

(608)
—
745

(63,086) (a)
—
242

8,214
82,453
14,690

64

(a)

Items not allocated to segments consist of:

General and administrative expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share-based and long-term incentive compensation

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other corporate non-operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$(50,354)

(In thousands)
$(18,274)

$(24,802)

(7,201)
28,674
(8,532)
(611)
1,627

(4,425)
48,891
(19,985)
(35,864)
350

(4,474)
—
(34,066)
—
256

$(36,397)

$(29,307)

$(63,086)

(b)

Total assets excludes assets of discontinued operations of $14,000 and $104,967,000 in 2016 and 2015.

Note 18 — Share-Based and Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Share-based and long-term incentive compensation expense consists of:

Cash-settled awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity-settled awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total share-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Share-based and long-term incentive compensation expense is included in:

General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$ 634
5,001
—
1,008

$6,643
558

$7,201

(In thousands)
$ 717
2,444
22
854

$4,037
388

$4,425

$(3,127)
5,026
(8)
2,355

$ 4,246
228

$ 4,474

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

$6,177
1,024

$7,201

(In thousands)
$3,323
1,102

$4,425

$2,451
2,023

$4,474

In 2017, share-based compensation expense included $4,349,000 in charges related to the acceleration of vesting
and settlement of outstanding equity awards in connection with the Merger. Excluded from share-based compensation
expense in the table above are fees earned by our previous directors in the amount of $449,000 for 2017, $725,000 for
2016 and $1,203,000 for 2015 for which they elected to defer payment until retirement in the form of share-settled
units. These deferred fees were settled in 2017 as a result of the Merger. These expenses are included in general and
administrative expense on our consolidated statements of income (loss).

Share-Based Compensation

The fair value of awards granted to retirement-eligible employees and expensed at the date of grant was $9,000 in
2017, $600,000 in 2016 and $517,000 in 2015. Unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested
equity-settled awards was $1,424,000 at year-end 2017. The weighted average period over which this amount will be
recognized is estimated to be four years. We did not capitalize any share-based compensation in 2017, 2016 or 2015.

In 2017 and 2016, we issued 322,586 and 300,491 shares out of our treasury stock associated with vesting of
stock-based awards or exercise of stock options, net of 75,870 and 25,082 shares withheld having a value of $981,000
and $222,000 for payroll taxes in connection with vesting of stock-based awards or exercise of stock options which are
reflected in financing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows.

65

Cash-settled awards

Cash-settled awards granted to our employees in the form of restricted stock units or stock appreciation rights generally

vest over three to five years from the date of grant and generally provide for accelerated vesting upon death, disability or if
there is a change in control. Cash-settled stock appreciation rights have a ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably
over four years and provide for accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if there is a change in
control. Stock appreciation rights are granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of our stock on the date of
grant.

Cash-settled awards granted to our directors in the form of restricted stock units are fully vested at the time of grant and

payable upon retirement.

The following table summarizes the activity of cash-settled restricted stock unit awards in 2017:

Non-vested at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Equivalent
Units

(In thousands)
42
—
(30)
(12)

Non-vested at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

(Per unit)
$14.98
—
15.66
13.15

—

The weighted average grant date fair value of cash-settled restricted stock unit awards was $13.26 per unit for 2015. The
fair value of cash-settled restricted stock unit awards settled was $2,178,000 in 2017, $1,195,000 in 2016, and $2,469,000 in
2015.

The following table summarizes the activity of cash-settled stock appreciation rights in 2017:

Balance at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Rights
Outstanding

(In thousands)
374
—
(234)
(140)

Balance at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

(Per share)
$12.97
—
10.14
17.69

—
—

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

(In years)
3

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(Current
Value Less
Exercise Price)

(In thousands)
$773

0
0

—
—

The intrinsic value of cash-settled stock appreciation rights settled was $1,581,000 in 2017, $154,000 in 2016 and

$206,000 in 2015.

The fair value of accrued cash-settled awards at year-end 2017 was $0 since all outstanding equity awards were

accelerated as a result of the Merger and $1,758,000 at year-end 2016 and was included in other liabilities in our consolidated
balance sheets.

Equity-settled awards

Equity-settled awards granted to our employees and directors include restricted stock units (RSU), which vest after three
years for directors and five years for employees from the date of grant, market-leveraged stock units (MSU), which vest after
three years from date of grant and performance stock units (PSU), which generally vest after three years from the date of grant
if certain performance goals are met. The following table summarizes the activity of equity-settled awards in 2017:

Non-vested at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Equivalent
Units

(In thousands)
555
198
(653)
(14)

Non-vested at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86

Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value

(Per unit)
$14.70
14.55
14.28
14.59

17.54

66

In 2017 and 2016, we granted 198,000 and 313,000 RSU awards. The grant date fair value was based on the
market value of the stock on the date of the grant. In 2015, we granted 234,000 MSU awards. The vesting of these
awards was accelerated in accordance with their terms upon change in control of the company and settled in cash in
2017 in connection with the Merger. We estimated the grant date fair value of MSU awards using a Monte Carlo
simulation pricing model and the following assumptions:

Expected stock price volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average grant date fair value of MSU awards

For the
Year

2015

32.9%
1.0%
—%

(per unit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$15.11

The weighted average grant date fair value of equity-settled awards (RSU, MSU and PSU) per unit in 2017, 2016

and 2015 was $14.55, $9.04 and $12.99. The fair value of equity-settled awards settled was $14,894,000, $2,884,000
and $4,451,000 in 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Stock options

Stock options have a ten-year term, generally become exercisable ratably over four years and provide for
accelerated or continued vesting upon retirement, death, disability or if there is a change in control. All options have
been granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of our stock on the date of grant. In the first quarter of
2016, stock options were issued to each of two new directors to acquire 20,000 shares of common stock of
which 6,500 shares vest on the first and second anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining 7,000 shares vest on
the third anniversary of the date of grant. Expense associated with annual restricted stock units and non-qualified stock
options to our board of directors is included in share-based compensation expense. The following table summarizes the
activity of stock option awards in 2017:

Balance at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised or settled in merger
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted
Average
Exercise or
Settlement
Price

(Per share)
$19.39
—
14.07
23.21

Options
Outstanding

(In thousands)
1,836
—
(768)
(1,068)

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term

(In years)
5

Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(Current
Value Less
Exercise Price)

(In thousands)
$449

Balance at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercisable at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

—
—

—
—

—
—

We estimated the grant date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the

following assumptions:

Expected stock price volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected life of options (years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average grant date fair value of options (per share) . . . . . .

For the Year

2016

2015

39.5% 45.6%
1.8%
6

1.5%
6
—% —%

$8.60

$6.51

We determine the expected life using the simplified method which utilizes the midpoint between the vesting
period and the contractual life of the awards. The expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using a
blend of historical and implied volatility.

The intrinsic value of options exercised was $2,603,000 in 2017, $61,000 in 2016 and $0 in 2015.

67

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

In 2017 and 2016, we granted $1,180,000 and $620,000 of long-term incentive compensation in the form of

deferred cash compensation. The 2017 deferred cash awards vest annually over three years, and the 2016
deferred cash awards vest after two years. The 2016 award provides for accelerated vesting upon retirement,
disability, death, or if there is a change in control. Expense associated with deferred cash awards is recognized
ratably over the vesting period or earlier based on retirement eligibility or accelerated vesting under the change
of control provision. The 2016 award and the first payment on the 2017 award were settled in cash based upon
their terms in connection with the Merger.

Note 19 — Retirement Plans

Our defined contribution retirement plans include a 401(k) plan, which is funded, and a supplemental plan

for certain employees, which is unfunded. The expense of our defined contribution retirement plans was
$660,000 in 2017, $978,000 in 2016 and $1,060,000 in 2015. The unfunded liability for our supplemental plan
was $374,000 at year-end 2017 and $334,000 at year-end 2016 and is included in other liabilities.

Note 20 — Supplemental Oil and Gas Disclosures (Unaudited)

The following unaudited information regarding our oil and gas reserves has been prepared and is presented

pursuant to requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB).

As of year-end 2017, we had divested all of our oil and gas working interest properties. As a result of this
significant change in our operations, we have reported the results of operations and financial position of these
assets as discontinued operations within our consolidated statements of income (loss) and consolidated balance
sheets for all periods presented. However, all information presented in this unaudited supplemental oil and gas
disclosures footnote includes all oil and gas reserve estimates and results of operations. In addition, we have sold
our remaining mineral assets and no longer own any oil and gas or mineral assets.

We engaged independent petroleum engineers, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., to assist in preparing
estimates of our proved oil and gas reserves, all of which were located in the U.S., and future net cash flows as of
year-end 2016 and 2015.

These estimates were based on the economic and operating conditions existing at year-end 2016 and 2015.
Proved developed reserves are those quantities of petroleum from existing wells and facilities, which by analysis
of geosciences and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be commercially recoverable,
from a given date forward for known reservoirs and under defined economic conditions, operating methods and
government regulations.

For 2016 and 2015, the primary internal technical person in charge of overseeing our reserves estimates had

a Bachelor of Science in Physics and Mathematics and a Master’s of Science in Civil Engineering. He had over
40 years of domestic and international experience in the exploration and production business including 40 years
of reserve evaluations. He had been a registered Professional Engineer for over 25 years.

As part of our internal control over financial reporting, for 2016 and 2015 we had a process for reviewing
well production data and division of interest percentages prior to submitting well level data to NSAI to assist us
in preparing reserve estimates. Our primary internal technical person and other members of management
reviewed the reserve estimates prepared by NSAI, including the underlying assumptions and estimates upon
which they are based, for accuracy and reasonableness.

SEC rules require disclosure of proved reserves using the twelve-month average beginning-of-month price (which

we refer to as the average price) for the year. These same average prices also were used in calculating the amount of
(and changes in) future net cash inflows related to the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.

For 2016 and 2015, the average spot price per barrel of oil based on the West Texas Intermediate price was
$42.75 and $50.28 and the average price per MMBTU of gas based on the Henry Hub spot was $2.48 and $2.59.
All prices were then adjusted for quality, transportation fees and differentials.

The process of estimating proved reserves and future net cash flows is complex involving decisions and

assumptions in evaluating the available engineering and geologic data and prices for oil and gas and the cost to
produce these reserves and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. As a result, these estimates were
imprecise and could be expected to change as future information became available.

68

Estimated Quantities of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves

Estimated quantities of proved oil and gas reserves are summarized as follows:

Consolidated entities:

Year-end 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions of previous estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extensions and discoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions of previous estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extensions and discoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions of previous estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extensions and discoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Our share of ventures accounted for using the equity

method:

Year-end 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions of previous estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revisions of previous estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total consolidated and our share of equity method

ventures:

Year-end 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved developed reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved undeveloped reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Year-end 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved developed reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved undeveloped reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Year-end 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year-end 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved developed reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved undeveloped reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Year-end 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reserves

Oil (a)
(Barrels)

Gas
(Mcf)

(In thousands)

7,672
(855)
224
—
(704)
(1,158)
5,179
(11)
29
—
(4,460)
(291)
446
—
—
—
(446)
—
—

12,649
(1,675)
173
—
(1,223)
(1,967)
7,957
631
—
—
(3,756)
(996)
3,836
—
—
—
(3,836)
—
—

—
1,751
—
(320)
—
(168)
—
1,263
—
79
—
(143)
1,199
—
— (1,199)
—
—

5,179
—
5,179

446
—
446

—
—
—

9,220
—
9,220

5,035
—
5,035

—
—
—

(a)

Includes natural gas liquids (NGLs).

69

We did not have any estimated reserves or wells with production of synthetic oil, synthetic gas or products
of other non-renewable natural resources that are intended to be upgraded into synthetic oil and gas as of year-
end 2017, 2016 or 2015.

In 2017, we sold oil and gas wells located primarily in Texas and Louisiana. Our net reserves for those

properties as of year-end 2016 were 446,000 barrels of oil and 5,035,000 Mcf of gas.

In 2016, we sold oil and gas wells located primarily in Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska and North Dakota. Our
net reserves for those properties as of year-end 2015 less our share of 2016 production were 4,155,000 barrels of
oil, 305,000 barrels of NGL, and 3,756,000 Mcf of gas. Oklahoma properties sold were mainly mature gas wells.
Kansas and Nebraska produce oil from the Lansing/Kansas City formation. The North Dakota oil wells produce
from the Bakken/Three Forks formation.

In 2015, oil and gas properties having reserves consisting of approximately 704,000 barrels of oil and
1,223,000 Mcf of gas located primarily in the Texas Panhandle and Bakken/Three Forks formations were sold.
Due to the significant decline in oil and gas prices during 2015, net negative revisions of previous estimates were
855,000 barrels of oil and 1,995,000 Mcf of gas. At year-end 2015, we had no barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) of
proved undeveloped (PUD) reserves based on our plan to exit non-core oil and gas working interest assets
compared with 2,703,000 BOE of PUD reserves at year-end 2014.

In 2016 and 2015, reserve additions from new wells drilled and completed during the year are shown for
both consolidated entities and ventures accounted for using the equity method under extensions and discoveries.
There were no new well additions in 2017, no new well additions in 2016 and 36 new well additions in 2015.

Capitalized Costs Relating to Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Capitalized costs related to our oil and gas producing activities classified as assets held for sale at year-end

2016 are as follows:

At Year-End

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Consolidated entities:

Unproved oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proved oil and gas properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $
—

374
5,159

Total costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and

amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

5,533

(4,751)

$— $

782

We have not capitalized any costs for our share in ventures accounted for using the equity method.

Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development

Costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development activities, whether

capitalized or expensed, follows:

Consolidated entities:
Acquisition costs

Proved properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unproved properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

$— $ — $ —
4,832
15
—
17,922
21
—
27,609
537
—

$— $573

$50,363

We have not incurred any costs for our share in ventures accounted for using the equity method. In 2015,

acquisition of leasehold interests, exploration expenses, and development costs have decreased as a result of our
increased focus on exiting and selling our leasehold working interests.

70

Drilling and Other Exploratory and Development Activities

The following tables set forth the number of gross and net oil and gas wells in which we participated:

Year

Gross Wells

Exploratory

Development

Total Oil Gas Dry Oil Gas Dry

2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — —
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — —
34 — 1
2015 (a)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 — 1

38

(a) Of the gross wells drilled in 2015, we operated 3 wells or 8 percent. The remaining wells represent our

participations in wells operated by others. The exploratory dry hole was located in Oklahoma.

Year

Net Wells

Exploratory

Development

Total Oil Gas Dry Oil Gas Dry

2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — —
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — —
4.3 — 0.5
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.7 — 0.8

6.3

Present Activities

None.

Delivery Commitments

We have no oil or gas delivery commitments.

Wells and Acreage

We had no interest in any productive wells as of year-end 2017.

At year-end 2017, 2016 and 2015, we had royalty interests in 0, 473 and 534 gross wells. In addition, at

year-end 2017, 2016 and 2015, we had working interests in 0, 32 and 400 gross wells.

Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows

Estimates of future cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves are shown in the following table. Estimated

income taxes are calculated by applying the appropriate tax rates to the estimated future pre-tax net cash flows
less depreciation of the tax basis of properties and the statutory depletion allowance.

At Year-End

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

Consolidated entities:

Future cash inflows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$— $24,304
Future production and development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (2,988)
Future income tax expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (3,926)

$216,588
(93,623)
(22,218)

Future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 17,390
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — (7,077)

100,747
(33,951)

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Our share in ventures accounted for using the equity method:

$— $10,313

$ 66,796

Future cash inflows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Future production and development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Future income tax expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

$— $ 2,010
(216)
(537)

$

Future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

1,257
(585)

2,283
(245)
(774)

1,264
(562)

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $

672

$

702

Total consolidated and our share of equity method ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $10,985

$ 67,498

71

Future net cash flows were computed using prices used in estimating proved oil and gas reserves, year-end

costs, and statutory tax rates (adjusted for tax deductions) that relate to proved oil and gas reserves.

Changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow follows:

For the Year

Consolidated

Our Share of Equity
Method Ventures

Total

Year-end 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes resulting from:

$ 163,841

Net change in sales prices and production costs . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in future development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of oil and gas, net of production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to extensions and discoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to acquisition of reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to divestitures of reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to revisions of quantity estimates . . . . . . . . . .
Previously estimated development costs incurred . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of discount
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in timing and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(136,536)
92
(31,732)
11,747
—
(15,855)
(15,164)
15,096
22,600
4,018
48,689

Aggregate change for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(97,045)

Year-end 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes resulting from:

Net change in sales prices and production costs . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in future development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of oil and gas, net of production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to extensions and discoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to acquisition of reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to divestitures of reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to revisions of quantity estimates . . . . . . . . . .
Previously estimated development costs incurred . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of discount
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in timing and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Aggregate change for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year-end 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes resulting from:

Net change in sales prices and production costs . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in future development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sales of oil and gas, net of production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to extensions and discoveries . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to acquisition of reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to divestitures of reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change due to revisions of quantity estimates . . . . . . . . . .
Previously estimated development costs incurred . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of discount
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in timing and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Aggregate change for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

66,796

(3,585)
—
(5,663)
410
—
(63,535)
1,304
—
2,992
(128)
11,722

(56,483)

10,313

—
—
—
—
—
(10,313)
—
—
—
—
—

(10,313)

(In thousands)
$ 1,775

$ 165,616

(1,112)
—
(428)
—
—
—
(267)
—
286
(210)
658

(1,073)

702

(60)
—
(208)
—
—
—
63
—
113
(80)
142

(30)

672

—
—
—
—
—
(672)
—
—
—
—
—

(672)

(137,648)
92
(32,160)
11,747
—
(15,855)
(15,431)
15,096
22,886
3,808
49,347

(98,118)

67,498

(3,645)
—
(5,871)
410
—
(63,535)
1,367
—
3,105
(208)
11,864

(56,513)

10,985

—
—
—
—
—
(10,985)
—
—
—
—
—

(10,985)

Year-end 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

—

$ —

$

—

72

Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities

Our royalty interests were contractually defined and based on a percentage of production at prevailing
market prices. We received our percentage of production in cash. Similarly, for operating properties our working
interests and the associated net revenue interests were contractually defined and we paid our proportionate share
of the capital and operating costs to develop and operate the well and we marketed our share of the production.
Our revenues fluctuated based on changes in the market prices for oil and gas, the decline in production from
existing wells, and other factors affecting oil and gas exploration and production activities, including the cost of
development and production.

Information about the results of operations of our oil and gas interests follows:

For the Year

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

Consolidated entities

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exploration costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation, depletion, amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash impairment of proved oil and gas properties and unproved

leasehold interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (expense) benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$10,111
$ 1,399
(4,392)
(209)
(34)
(124)
— (2,157)

$ 51,553
(19,820)
(11,864)
(28,774)

(224)
(1,197)
—
(7)

(612)
(8,700)
(56)
(20)

(164,831)
(11,700)
(144)
14,717

Results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(272)

(5,950)

(170,863)

Our share in ventures accounted for using the equity method:

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Production costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil and gas administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax (expense) benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

100
(19)
(2)
—

$

284
(76)
(35)
—

Results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

79

$

173

$

428
(102)
(51)
21

296

Total results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (193) $ (5,777) $(170,567)

Production costs represent our share of oil and gas production severance taxes, and lease operating
expenses. Exploration costs principally represent exploratory dry hole costs, geological and geophysical and
seismic study costs.

73

Note 21 — Summary of Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

Summarized quarterly financial results for 2017 and 2016 follows:

2017
Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes attributable

to Forestar Group Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to Forestar Group Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — basic

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — diluted

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016
Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated ventures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from continuing operations before taxes attributable to

Forestar Group Inc.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to Forestar Group Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — basic

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — diluted

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share — diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

First
Quarter (a)

Second
Quarter (a)

Third
Quarter (a)

Fourth
Quarter (a)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

$ 22,305
(28,332)
36,235
6,362

$ 28,015
11,559
6,965
2,747

$33,136
11,251
12,381
1,764

$ 30,866
10,065
(15,816)
7,026

40,998
418
25,205

8,120
1,229
(2,579)

13,223
37,193
45,202

(12,298)
7,191
(17,574)

$
$
$

$
$
$

0.59
0.01
0.60

0.58
0.01
0.59

$
$
$

(0.09) $
0.03
$
(0.06) $

(0.09)
0.03
(0.06)

0.19
0.88
1.07

0.19
0.87
1.06

$
$
$

$
$
$

(0.59)
0.17
(0.42)

(0.58)
0.18
(0.40)

$ 37,618
18,579
13,590
47

$ 47,992
(24,953)
69,528
188

$47,207
17,403
6,256
3,637

$ 64,497
17,352
50,980
2,251

5,992
(8,216)
(4,376)

26,591
(2,048)
9,614

7,163
(7,164)
9,665

51,069
563
43,745

$
$
$

$
$
$

$
0.11
(0.24) $
(0.13) $

$
0.09
(0.19) $
(0.10) $

$

0.40

$
0.28
(0.05) $ (0.17) $
$
0.23

0.23

$

$

0.40

$
0.28
(0.05) $ (0.17) $
$
0.23

0.23

$

1.03
0.01
1.04

1.02
0.01
1.03

(a) Non-cash impairment charges related to real estate, water assets and unproved leasehold interests and

proved oil and gas properties included in our quarterly financial results are as follows:

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

(In thousands)

2017

2016

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$37,900
$ — $ — $9,272
$ — $ — $ — $ —

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $48,826
612
$ — $

$7,627
$3,874
$ — $ —

74

Note 22 — Subsequent Event

On February 8, 2018, we entered into and closed on a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Starwood Land,
L.P. to sell 24 legacy projects for $232,000,000. This strategic asset sale included projects owned both directly
and indirectly through ventures and consisted of approximately 750 developed and under development lots, over
4,000 future undeveloped lots (including all real estate associated with the Cibolo Canyons mixed-use
development), 730 unentitled acres in California, an interest in one multifamily operating property and a
multifamily development site. The agreement contains representations, warranties and indemnities customary for
a real estate industry asset sale and includes certain adjustment provisions to the purchase price. The estimated
total net proceeds after certain purchase price adjustments, closing costs and other costs associated with selling
these projects is expected to be approximately $216,000,000.

At year-end 2017, we have recorded the estimated fair value of these assets on our balance sheet and as a
result have recognized a non-cash impairment charge of $3,000,000 related to the asset group. The owned real
estate projects are classified as assets held for sale and our equity interests in ventures continued to be classified
as investment in unconsolidated ventures at year-end 2017. The non-cash impairment is included in cost of real
estate sales and other on our consolidated statements of income (loss). This transaction is not expected to have a
material impact on our fiscal 2018 pre-tax earnings but is expected to generate tax losses which are currently
anticipated to substantially reduce our income tax expense for fiscal 2018.

75

e
t
a
D

f
o

e
t
a
D

d
e
r
i
u
q
c
A

n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

n
o
i
t
a
i
c
e
r
p
e
D

l
a
t
o
T

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

&

s
g
n
i
d
l
i
u
B

d
n
a
L
&
d
n
a
L

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

g
n

i
y
r
r
a
C

)
a
(
s
t
s
o
C

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

f
o
t
s
o
C
s
s
e
l

d
n
a

s
e
l
a
S

r
e
h
t
O

&

s
g
n

i

d

l
i

u
B

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

d
n
a
L

s
e
c
n
a
r
b
m
u
c
n
E

d
o
i
r
e
P
f
o
d
n
E

t
a
d
e
i
r
r
a
C

t
n
u
o
m
A
s
s
o
r
G

d
e
z
i
l
a
t
i

p
a
C
s
t
s
o
C

o
t

t
n
e
u
q
e
s
b
u
S

n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
A

o
t

t
s
o
C

l
a
i
t
i
n
I

y
n
a
p
m
o
C

.
c
n
I
p
u
o
r
G
r
a
t
s
e
r
o
F

n
o
i
t
a
i
c
e
r
p
e
D
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
d
n
a

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R
d
e
t
a
d

i
l
o
s
n
o
C
—

I
I
I

e
l
u
d
e
h
c
S

7
1
0
2
d
n
E
-
r
a
e
Y

)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
I
(

y
t
n
u
o
C
a
t
s
o
C
a
r
t
n
o
C

A
I
N
R
O
F
I
L
A
C

t
e
N

,
e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

n
o
i
t
p

i
r
c
s
e
D

7
8
1
,
3

3
3
9
,
3

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

o
l
e
i
C

)
8
5
5
,
0
1
(

5
2
2
,
2
1

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

r
e
v
i
R
n
i
u
q
a
o
J

n
a
S

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
a
l
g
u
o
D

O
D
A
R
O
L
O
C

)
b
(

6
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

6
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

7
6
6
,
1

0
2
1
,
7

6
4
2
,
3

6
8
8
,
4

9
9
9
,
2
1

7
1
4
,
2

8
8
5
,
8
1

6
4

3
2
2
,
4

0
7
3
,
1

5
3
4
,
3

3
7

8
9
8
,
2

9
3
6
,
2

7
6
6
,
1

0
2
1
,
7

6
4
2
,
3

6
8
8
,
4

9
9
9
,
2
1

7
1
4
,
2

8
8
5
,
8
1

6
4

3
2
2
,
4

0
7
3
,
1

1
6

4
4
2

0
7
3

2
4
7

8
4
7

1
5
6
,
2

)
9
1
2
(

8
9
1
,
1

6
1
1

5
3
4
,
3

6
0
5

)
8
4
9
(

3
7

8
9
8
,
2

9
3
6
,
2

5
2
2

9
3
1

5
7
2

)
2
2
9
(

)
8
6
1
,
4
(

0
7
0
,
1

2
0
0
,
3

6
1
5
,
4

7
5
2
,
2
1

9
6
6
,
1

7
3
9
,
5
1

5
6
2

4
6
9
,
2

4
5
2
,
1

7
7
8
,
3

6
5
8

1
4
8
,
6

4
9
2
,
1

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
k
a
O

t
s
e

W

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

e
c
a
l
P
s
i
r
r
a
H

s
l
l
i

H
n
e
v
e
S

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

e
c
n
e
d
n
e
p
e
d
n
I

y
t
n
u
o
C
g
n
i
d
l
u
a
P

y
t
n
u
o
C

t
t
e
n
n
i
w
G

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

m
a
h
s
r
e
b
a
H

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

k
e
e
r
C
s
s
o
M

A
N
I
L
O
R
A
C
H
T
U
O
S

y
t
n
u
o
C
k
r
o
Y

A
N
I
L
O
R
A
C
H
T
R
O
N

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
u
r
r
a
b
b
a
C

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
o
s
m
a
i
l
l
i

W

E
E
S
E
N
N
E
T

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
m
r
a
F
n
a
g
r
o
M

s
e
t
a
t
s
E
d
r
o
f
r
e
h
t
a
e

W

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

g
n
i
s
s
o
r
C
h
t
i

w
k
c
e
B

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
o
s
l
i

W

y
t
n
u
o
C
b
b
o
C

A
I
G
R
O
E
G

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

r
a
i
r
b
e
n
o
t
S
t
a

s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
P
e
h
T

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

k
e
e
r
C
x
o
F

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
e
d
a
s
i
l
a
P

y
t
n
u
o
C
a
t
o
s
a
r
a
S

y
t
n
u
o
C
e
e
t
a
n
a
M

76

y
t
n
u
o
C
d
r
a
v
e
r
B

A
D
I
R
O
L
F

e
t
a
D

f
o

e
t
a
D

d
e
r
i
u
q
c
A

n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

n
o
i
t
a
i
c
e
r
p
e
D

l
a
t
o
T

&

s
g
n
i
d
l
i
u
B

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

d
n
a
L
&
d
n
a
L

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

g
n

i
y
r
r
a
C

)
a
(
s
t
s
o
C

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

f
o
t
s
o
C
s
s
e
l

d
n
a

s
e
l
a
S

r
e
h
t
O

&

s
g
n

i

d

l
i

u
B

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

d
n
a
L

s
e
c
n
a
r
b
m
u
c
n
E

d
o
i
r
e
P
f
o
d
n
E

t
a
d
e
i
r
r
a
C

t
n
u
o
m
A
s
s
o
r
G

d
e
z
i
l
a
t
i

p
a
C
s
t
s
o
C

o
t

t
n
e
u
q
e
s
b
u
S

n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
A

o
t

t
s
o
C

l
a
i
t
i
n
I

y
n
a
p
m
o
C

6
0
0
2

2
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

7
0
0
2

9
9
9
1

4
1
0
2

5
0
0
2

7
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

1
0
0
2

4
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

7
9
9
1

6
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

2
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

4
1
0
2

7
0
0
2

0
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

2
1
0
2

2
0
0
2

5
1
0
2

6
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

2
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

5
1
0
2

6
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

8
7
5

0
1
3

7
4
5

4
0
9
,
3
1

8
7
5
,
8

2
7
6
,
1

0
3
4
,
5

4
1
1
,
7

8
9
7
,
1

1
8
3

6
1
7
,
4

9
4
3
,
8

6
3
2
,
1

8
1
4
,
5

2
4
7
,
4

8
7
5

0
1
3

7
4
5

4
0
9
,
3
1

8
7
5
,
8

2
7
6
,
1

0
3
4
,
5

4
1
1
,
7

8
9
7
,
1

1
8
3

6
1
7
,
4

9
4
3
,
8

6
3
2
,
1

8
1
4
,
5

2
4
7
,
4

3
5
4

7
0
3

2
1
2

5
8
5

6
5
2

0
6

5

9
2
2

—

0
3
4

)
5
2
0
,
8
(

)
4
9
0
,
9
(

)
7
3
9
,
1
(

0
1
4
,
6

5
4
4

)
1
8
6
(

)
0
8
6
,
9
1
(

0
9
0
,
4

)
1
4
7
,
1
(

)
4
3
6
(

)
4
9
7
,
3
(

0
4
3

)
1
5
6
,
1
(

3
2
6
,
3

2
4
7
,
4

3
0
6
,
8

1
5
9
,
8

7
7
1
,
2

2
8
2
,
7

7
2
2
,
1

5
5
8
,
5

3
7
6
,
7
2

4
2
0
,
3

9
7
4
,
3

6
4
9
,
3

5
4
3
,
5

9
0
0
,
8

—

7
8
8
,
2

5
6
3
,
1

0
9
2

—
$

0
8
3
,
0
3
1
$

—
$

0
8
3
,
0
3
1
$

3
4
7
,
3
$

)
6
7
0
,
4
3
(
$

—
$

3
1
7
,
0
6
1
$

0
9
2
$

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

l
o
c
a
r
a
C

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
u
o
h
l
a
C

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
i
l
l
o
C

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

r
e
p
s
o
r
P
f
o
s
e
k
a
L

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

e
d
i
s
k
r
a
P

k
e
e
r
C

r
e
b
m
T

i

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
o
t
n
e
D

.

.

.

.

.

.

a
n
a
t
n
a
L

e
g
d
E
s
’
r
e
v
i
R

k
e
e
r
C
n
a
c
e
P
t
a

e
v
r
e
s
e
r
P
e
h
T

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

y
n
o
l
o
C
n
r
e
h
t
u
o
S

s
m
r
a
F
k
e
e
r
C
w
o
l
l
i

W

y
t
n
u
o
C
d
n
e
B

t
r
o
F

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
i
r
r
a
H

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

k
r
a
P
y
t
i

C

t
s
e
r
o
F
l
a
i
r
e
p
m

I

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
a
m
f
u
a
K

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
l
i
a
r
T
d
o
o
w
e
k
a
L

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

h
c
n
a
R
k
e
e
r
C

r
e
m
m
u
S

y
t
n
u
o
C

t
n
a
r
r
a
T

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

h
c
n
a
R
C

r
a
B
e
h
T

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

r
e
h
t
O

t
e
N

,
e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

l
a
t
o
T

)
c
(

e
l
a
S
r
o
f
d
l
e
H
e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
e
l
e
g
n
A
s
o
L

A
I
N
R
O
F
I
L
A
C

S
A
X
E
T

n
o
i
t
p

i
r
c
s
e
D

77

2
0
7
,
5
2

$

2
0
7
,
5
2

$

2
5
7
,
1
2

$

0
5
9
,
3

$

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
s
e
c
o
r
P
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
i
t
n
E
n
I

d
n
a
L

7
5
1
,
1
1

6
0
7
,
2

2
2
9
,
6

2
9
0
,
2

1
8
8
,
7
1

2
0
6
,
9

7
5
1
,
1
1

6
0
7
,
2

2
2
9
,
6

2
9
0
,
2

0
0
1

$

9
4
8
,
3

)
5
9
2
(

3
7
0
,
4

)
6
8
7
,
1
(

1
8
8
,
7
1

0
5
3

6
4
4
,
5

2
0
6
,
9

5
1
3

8
9
1
,
4

8
0
3
,
7

1
0
0
,
3

9
4
7
,
2

8
7
8
,
3

5
8
0
,
2
1

9
8
0
,
5

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
d
n
a
l
h
g
i
H
o
l
a
f
f
u
B

s
m
r
a
F
n
w
o
t
s
n
h
o
J

.

.

.

.

.

r
e
k
a
r
b
e
n
o
t
S

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

t
s
e

W
y
r
e
n
i
P

y
t
n
u
o
C
d
l
e

W

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

n
e
d
l
a

W

y
t
n
u
o
C
g
r
u
b
n
e
l
k
c
e

M

A
N
I
L
O
R
A
C
H
T
R
O
N

A
N
I
L
O
R
A
C
H
T
U
O
S

y
t
n
u
o
C
r
e
t
s
a
c
n
a
L

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

k
r
a
P
y
e
l
s
n
A

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
a
l
g
u
o
D

O
D
A
R
O
L
O
C

e
t
a
D

f
o

e
t
a
D

d
e
r
i
u
q
c
A

n
o
i
t
c
u
r
t
s
n
o
C

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

n
o
i
t
a
i
c
e
r
p
e
D

l
a
t
o
T

&

s
g
n
i
d
l
i
u
B

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

d
n
a
L
&
d
n
a
L

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

g
n

i
y
r
r
a
C

)
a
(
s
t
s
o
C

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

f
o
t
s
o
C
s
s
e
l

d
n
a

s
e
l
a
S

r
e
h
t
O

&

s
g
n

i

d

l
i

u
B

s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
r
p
m

I

d
n
a
L

s
e
c
n
a
r
b
m
u
c
n
E

d
o
i
r
e
P
f
o
d
n
E

t
a
d
e
i
r
r
a
C

t
n
u
o
m
A
s
s
o
r
G

d
e
z
i
l
a
t
i

p
a
C
s
t
s
o
C

o
t

t
n
e
u
q
e
s
b
u
S

n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
A

o
t

t
s
o
C

l
a
i
t
i
n
I

y
n
a
p
m
o
C

5
1
0
2

1
0
0
2

6
8
9
1

7
0
0
2

2
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

1
1
0
2

7
0
0
2

4
1
0
2

1
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

3
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

8
7
8
,
8

3
8
5
,
7

9
8
0
,
1
4

2
4
1
,
5
1

8
5
2
,
3

1
3
3
,
2

8
5
0
,
1

1
8
7
,
0
2

9
4
7
,
5

)
4
8
6
,
1
(

9
4
7
,
5

)
4
8
6
,
1
(

8
7
8
,
8

5
5
4

8
4
8
,
4

3
8
5
,
7

0
7
9
,
3

9
8
0
,
1
4

6
9
6
,
1

8
8
0
,
2
2

2
4
1
,
5
1

8
0
6

2
1
7
,
1

8
5
2
,
3

1
3
3
,
2

8
5
0
,
1

9
8

7
1

)
0
0
1
,
1
(

)
0
9
4
,
2
(

)
2
9
8
,
7
(

1
8
7
,
0
2

6
8
2

9
3
6
,
7

)
5
2
5
,
1
(

)
4
8
6
,
1
(

3
0
8
,
2
6
$

7
2
7
,
8
2
$

5
7
5
,
3

3
1
6
,
3

5
0
3
,
7
1

2
2
8
,
2
1

9
6
2
,
4

4
0
8
,
4

0
5
9
,
8

6
5
8
,
2
1

4
7
2
,
7

—
$

—
$

8
2
5
,
3
1
1
$

1
4
2
,
4
7
2
$

—

$

0
9
2
$

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

d
a
e
t
s
m
r
a
F
s
e
l
a
c
S

y
t
n
u
o
C
p
o
r
t
s
a
B

S
A
X
E
T

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

g
n
i
s
s
o
r
C
s
’
r
e
t
n
u
H

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

s
n
o
y
n
a
C
o
l
o
b
i
C

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
k
r
a
P
r
e
m
m
u
S

s
e
k
a
L
r
e
m
m
u
S

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

k
e
e
r
C
y
e
n
o
t
S

y
t
n
u
o
C
d
n
e
B

t
r
o
F

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
i
r
r
a
H

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

n
o
t
g
n
i
r
r
a
B

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
a
l
l
a
D

y
t
n
u
o
C
r
a
x
e
B

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
y
a
H

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

h
c
n
a
R
d
a
e
h
w
o
r
r

A

y
t
n
u
o
C
n
o
s

m
a
i
l
l
i

W

E
E
S
S
E
N
N
E
T

n
o
i
t
p

i
r
c
s
e
D

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

e
t
i
s
y
l
i

m
a
f
i
t
l
u
m
n
i
t
s
u
A

t
s
e

W

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

)
d
(

r
e
h
t
O

y
t
n
u
o
C
s
i
v
a
r
T

)
c
(

e
l
a
S
r
o
f
d
l
e
H
e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R

l
a
t
o
T

.

e
t
a
t
s
E

l
a
e
R
n
i

t
n
e
m

t
s
e
v
n
I

l
a
t
o
T

78

—
$

—
$

7
4
2
,
0
8
1
$

7
2
6
,
0
1
3
$

—
$

—
$

7
4
2
,
0
8
1
$

7
2
6
,
0
1
3
$

6
1
9
,
3
$

9
5
6
,
7
$

.
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
t

s
i
h
t

g
n
i
d
r
a
g
e
r
n
o
i
t
a
m
r
o
f
n
i

l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
a

r
o
f

t
n
e
v
E

t
n
e
u
q
e
s
b
u
S
—
2
2

e
t
o
N
d
a
e
r

e
s
a
e
l
P

.
8
1
0
2

,
8

y
r
a
u
r
b
e
F
n
o

d
o
o
w
r
a
t
S
o
t

e
l
a
s

t
e
s
s
a

c
i
g
e
t
a
r
t
s

e
h
t

n
i
d
e
d
u
l
c
n
I

.
d
o
o
w
r
a
t
S
o
t

d
l
o
s

p
u
o
r
g
t
e
s
s
a

e
h
t

h
t
i

w
d
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a

7
1
0
2

r
e
t
r
a
u
q

h
t
r
u
o
f

n
i

s
e
g
r
a
h
c

t
n
e
m

r
i
a
p
m

i
h
s
a
c
-
n
o
n

n
i

0
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
3
$
s
e
d
u
l
c
n
I

.
s
n
i
g
e
b
t
n
e
m
p
o
l
e
v
e
d
l
i
t
n
u
s
t
s
o
c

g
n
i
y
r
r
a
c

e
z
i
l
a
t
i
p
a
c

t
o
n

o
d
e

W

.
e
l
b
a
l
i
a
v
a

t
o
n

s
i

e
t
a
d
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a

e
h
T

)
a
(

)
b
(

)
c
(

)
d
(

Reconciliation of real estate (a):

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts retired or adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$293,003
105,611
(87,987)

(In thousands)
$ 618,844
89,780
(415,621)

$ 607,133
124,633
(112,922)

Balance at close of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$310,627

$ 293,003

$ 618,844

2017

2016

2015

Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation:

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts retired or adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $(32,129)
(816)
—
32,945
—

$(31,377)
(6,810)
6,058

Balance at close of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $

— $(32,129)

2017

2016

2015

(In thousands)

(a)

Includes real estate classified as assets held for sale as of year-end 2017.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure controls and procedures

Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (or the Exchange Act)), as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and were effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Internal control over financial reporting

Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of our independent

registered public accounting firm are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter 2017 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

79

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Set forth below is certain information about the members of our Board of Directors:

Name

Year First
Elected to
the Board

Age

Principal Occupation

Samuel R. Fuller . . . . . . . . . . 74
M. Ashton Hudson . . . . . . . . 45
G.F. (Rick) Ringler, III . . . . . 70

2017 Retired Chief Financial Officer of D.R. Horton, Inc.
2016
2017 Retired Senior Vice President — Commercial and Real Estate

President and General Counsel of Rock Creek Capital Group, Inc.

Donald C. Spitzer . . . . . . . . . 68

2017 Retired National Managing Partner and Partner-in-Charge of

Donald J. Tomnitz . . . . . . . . 69

2017

KPMG
Executive Chairman of Forestar Group Inc.

Lending for Frost Bank

The remaining information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from our definitive
proxy statement, involving the election of directors, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A with the SEC not later
than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K (or Definitive Proxy Statement). Certain
information required by this item concerning executive officers is included in Part I of this report.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder

Matters.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our Definitive Proxy Statement.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Documents filed as part of this report.

(1) Financial Statements

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule III — Consolidated Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is included in Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Schedules other than those listed above are omitted as the required information is either inapplicable or the
information is presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index in (b) below are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(b) Exhibits

80

Exhibit
Number

2.1

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

10.1†

10.2†

10.3†

10.4†

10.5†

10.6†

10.7†

10.8†*

10.9†

10.10†

10.11†

10.12†

10.13†

10.14†

10.15†

10.16†*
10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22†

10.23†

10.24†

10.25

Exhibit

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 29, 2017, by and among Forestar Group Inc., D.R. Horton, Inc. and Force
Merger Sub, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on June 29, 2017).
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Forestar Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 10, 2017).
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Forestar Group Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 10, 2017).
Specimen Certificate for shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 5, 2017).
Indenture, dated February 26, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on February 26, 2013).
Supplemental Indenture, dated February 26, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 26, 2013).
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated October 5, 2017, between Forestar Group Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
October 10, 2017).
Form of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.3 above) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 26, 2013).
Forestar Real Estate Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of
Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s Form 10 filed with the Commission on December 10, 2007).
Amendment No. 1 to Forestar Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013).
Forestar Real Estate Group Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Amendment No. 5 to
the Company’s Form 10 filed with the Commission on December 10, 2007).
Amendment No. 2 to Forestar Group Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 11, 2014).
Forestar Group Inc. Amended and Restated Directors’ Fee Deferral Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 11, 2014).
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on October 10, 2017).
Form of Change in Control/Severance Agreement between the Company and its named executive officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Form 10 filed with the Commission on August 10, 2007).
Form of First Amendment to Change in Control/Severance Agreement between the Company and certain named executive
officers.
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 5, 2009).
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013).
Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013).
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 12, 2009).
First Amendment to the Forestar Real Estate Group Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 13, 2009).
Second Amendment to the Forestar Group Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 3, 2010).
Form of Market-Leveraged Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 14, 2013).
Form of Long-Term Incentive Cash Award Notice.
Guaranty, dated July 15, 2014, by Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group Inc. in favor of Regions Bank (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 18, 2014).
Letter of Credit Facility Agreement, dated October 5, 2017, among Forestar Group Inc., Keybank National Association, as
lender and administrative agent, and Keybanc Capital Markets, as sole arranger and sole bookrunner (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 10, 2017).
Shared Services Agreement, dated October 6, 2017, between Forestar Group Inc. and D.R. Horton, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 10, 2017).
Stockholder’s Agreement dated as of June 29, 2017, by and between Forestar Group Inc. and D.R. Horton, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 29, 2017).
Master Supply Agreement dated as of June 29, 2017, by and between Forestar Group Inc. and D.R. Horton, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 29, 2017).
Employment Agreement, dated October 21, 2015, between Forestar Group Inc. and Phillip J. Weber (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 26, 2015).
First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2017, between Forestar Group Inc. and Phillip J. Weber
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
August 28, 2017).
Separation Agreement and Release, dated as of April 13, 2017, by and between Forestar Group Inc. and David M. Grimm
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
April 14, 2017).
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated February 17, 2017, between Forestar (USA) Real Estate Group Inc. and Mineral
Resources Partners, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on February 17, 2017).

81

10.26

21.1*
23.1*
31.1*

31.2*

32.1*

32.2*

101.1*

Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated February 8, 2018, by and between certain subsidiaries of Forestar Group Inc. and
Starwood Land, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on February 8, 2018)
List of Subsidiaries of the Company.
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income
(Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statement of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.

Filed herewith.

*
† Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

82

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant

has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

FORESTAR GROUP INC.

By:

/s/ Charles D. Jehl

Charles D. Jehl
Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 28, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by

the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Capacity

Date

/s/ Daniel C. Bartok

Daniel C. Bartok

/s/ Charles D. Jehl

Charles D. Jehl

/s/ Donald J. Tomnitz

Donald J. Tomnitz

/s/ Samuel R. Fuller

Samuel R. Fuller

/s/ M. Ashton Hudson

M. Ashton Hudson

/s/ G.F. (Rick) Ringler, III

G.F. (Rick) Ringler, III

/s/ Donald C. Spitzer

Donald C. Spitzer

Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

February 28, 2018

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal
Accounting Officer)

February 28, 2018

Executive
Chairman of the Board

February 28, 2018

Director

February 28, 2018

Director

February 28, 2018

Director

February 28, 2018

Director

February 28, 2018

83

STOCKHOLDER
INFORMATION

FORESTAR GROUP INC.

BOARD MEMBERS

Transfer Agent & Registrar
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
781.575.2879

Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young, LLP, Austin, Texas

Donald J. Tomnitz
Executive Chairman of the Board

Samuel R. Fuller
Retired Chief Financial Officer of D.R. Horton, Inc.

M. Ashton Hudson
President and General Counsel
of Rock Creek Capital Group, Inc.

Annual Meeting
The 2018 annual meeting of our stockholders will be
held at 10700 Pecan Park Blvd., Suite 150, Austin,
Texas on May 8, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. CDT.

G.F. (Rick) Ringler, III
Retired Senior Vice President — Commercial and
Real Estate Lending for Frost Bank

Stock Listing
Forestar’s common stock is listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol FOR.

Donald C. Spitzer
Retired National Managing Partner and Partner-in-
Charge of KPMG

Company Website
Additional information regarding Forestar, including
the Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic
reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, may be obtained from Forestar’s
home page on the internet, the address of which
is www.forestargroup.com.

A copy of Forestar’s Annual Report on Form 10-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, will be sent without charge upon
written request made to the company’s Investor
Relations Department at the mailing address below.

Mailing Address
Forestar Group Inc.
10700 Pecan Park Blvd.
Suite 150
Austin, Texas 78750
512.433.5200

10700 Pecan Park Blvd.| Suite 150 | Austin, Texas 78750 | 512.433.5200 | www.forestargroup.com

FORESTAR GROUP INC.