GasLog Ltd

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F

(Mark One)
(cid:2)
(cid:3)

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(cid:2)
(cid:2)

GasLog Ltd.
(Exact name of Company as specified in its charter)

NOT APPLICABLE
(Translation of Company’s name into English)
Bermuda
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
c/o GasLog Monaco S.A.M.
Gildo Pastor Center
7 Rue du Gabian
MC 98000, Monaco
(Address of principal executive offices)
Line Køhler Ljungdahl, Head of Legal
c/o GasLog Monaco S.A.M.
Gildo Pastor Center
7 Rue du Gabian
MC 98000, Monaco
Monaco Telephone: +377 97 97 51 15 Facsimile: +377 97 97 51 24
(Name, Address, Telephone Number and Facsimile Number of Company contact person)

SECURITIES REGISTERED OR TO BE REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of Each Class
Common Shares, $0.01 par value per share

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: None
SECURITIES FOR WHICH THERE IS A REPORTING OBLIGATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF
THE ACT: None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the

close of the period covered by the annual report.

As of December 31, 2013, there were 62,863,166 common shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding.
Indicate by check mark if the Company is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities

Act.

Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the Company is not required to file
Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark whether the Company has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to submit
and post such files).

Yes (cid:2) No (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the Company is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated

filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Accelerated filer (cid:3)
Large accelerated filer (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the Company has used to prepare the financial statements

Non-accelerated filer (cid:2)

included in this filing.
U.S. GAAP (cid:2)

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board (cid:3)

Other (cid:2)

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement
item the Company has elected to follow.
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Company is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).

Item 17 (cid:2) Item 18 (cid:2)

Yes (cid:2) No (cid:3)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS REPORT
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

PART I
ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND
ADVISERS
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
KEY INFORMATION
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.
ITEM 4.A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
THE OFFER AND LISTING
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY
SECURITIES

ITEM 12.

PART II
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY
HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
[RESERVED]

ITEM 15.
ITEM 16
ITEM 16.A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
ITEM 16.B. CODE OF ETHICS
ITEM 16.C.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 16.D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT

ITEM 16.E.

COMMITTEES
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND
AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

ITEM 16.F. CHANGE IN COMPANY’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
ITEM 16.G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 16.H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

PART III
ITEM 17.
ITEM 18.
ITEM 19.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EXHIBITS

i

Page

ii
ii

1

1
1
1
30
48
49
75
83
87
87
88

103

104

105
105

105
105
106
106
106
106

107

107
107
108
108

109
109
109
109
F-1

ABOUT THIS REPORT

In this annual report, unless otherwise indicated, references to:
• “GasLog”, the “Company”, the “Group”, “we”, “our”, “us” or similar terms refer to GasLog

Ltd. or any one or more of its subsidiaries or their predecessors, or to such entities
collectively;

• “BG Group” refers to BG Group plc or any one or more of its subsidiaries or to such

entities collectively;

• “Shell” refers to Royal Dutch Shell plc or any one or more of its subsidiaries or to such

entities collectively;

• “Samsung Heavy Industries” refers to “Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.”; and
• “cbm” refer to cubic meters.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

All statements in this annual report that are not statements of historical fact are “forward-

looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. The disclosure and analysis set forth in this annual report includes assumptions,
expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events in a number of places,
particularly in relation to our operations, cash flows, financial position, plans, strategies, business
prospects, changes and trends in our business and the markets in which we operate. These
statements are intended as “forward-looking statements”. In some cases, predictive, future-tense or
forward-looking words such as “believe”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “project”, “forecast”,
“plan”, “potential”, “may”, “should”, “could” and “expect” and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
In addition, we and our representatives may from time to time make other oral or written
statements which are forward-looking statements, including in our periodic reports that we file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC”, other information sent to our security
holders, and other written materials.

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, such matters as:
• general liquefied natural gas, or “LNG”, and LNG shipping market conditions and trends,
including charter rates, ship values, factors affecting supply and demand, technological
advancements and opportunities for the profitable operations of LNG carriers;

• our ability to enter into time charters with our existing customers as well as new customers;
• our contracted charter revenue;
• our customers’ performance of their obligations under our time charters and other contracts;
• the effect of volatile economic conditions and the differing pace of economic recovery in

different regions of the world;

• future operating or financial results and future revenues and expenses;
• our future financial condition and liquidity;
• our ability to obtain financing to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate
activities, funding by banks of their financial commitments, and our ability to meet our
obligations under our credit facilities;

• future, pending or recent acquisitions of ships or other assets, business strategy, areas of

possible expansion and expected capital spending or operating expenses;

• our ability to complete the formation of a proposed master limited partnership;
• our expectations relating to dividend payments and our ability to make such payments;
• our ability to enter into shipbuilding contracts for newbuildings and our expectations about

the availability of existing LNG carriers to purchase, as well as our ability to consummate any
such acquisitions;

ii

• our expectations about the time that it may take to construct and deliver newbuildings and

the useful lives of our ships;

• number of off-hire days, drydocking requirements and insurance costs;
• our anticipated general and administrative expenses;
• fluctuations in currencies and interest rates;
• our ability to maintain long-term relationships with major energy companies;
• expiration dates and extensions of charters;
• our ability to maximize the use of our ships, including the re-employment or disposal of ships

no longer under time charter commitments;

• environmental and regulatory conditions, including changes in laws and regulations or actions

taken by regulatory authorities;

• requirements imposed by classification societies;
• risks inherent in ship operation, including the discharge of pollutants;
• availability of skilled labor, ship crews and management;
• potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents, political events, piracy or acts by

terrorists;

• potential liability from future litigation; and
• other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report.
Many of these statements are based on our assumptions about factors that are beyond our
ability to control or predict and are subject to risks and uncertainties that are described more fully
in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report. Any of these factors or a
combination of these factors could materially affect future results of operations and the ultimate
accuracy of the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause future results to differ include,
but are not limited to, the following:

• changes in law, governmental rules and regulations, or actions taken by regulatory authorities;
• changes in economic and competitive conditions affecting our business;
• potential liability from future litigation;
• length and number of off-hire periods; and
• other factors discussed in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report.
We caution that these and other forward-looking statements included in this annual report

represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this annual report and are not
intended to give any assurance as to future results. Many of the forward-looking statements included
in this annual report are based on our assumptions about factors that are beyond our ability to
control or predict. Assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events
may, and often do, vary from actual results and these differences can be material. The reasons for
this include the risks, uncertainties and factors described in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk
Factors” of this annual report. As a result, the forward-looking events discussed in this annual report
might not occur and our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-
looking statements. Accordingly, you should not unduly rely on any forward-looking statements.

We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in

this annual report, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in our views or
expectations or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to
predict all of these factors. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business
or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to be
materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

iii

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

PART I

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. Selected Financial Data

The following table presents summary consolidated financial and other data of GasLog Ltd. for
each of the five years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2013. The summary consolidated
financial data of GasLog Ltd. as of December 31, 2012 and 2013, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2013, is a summary of and is derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in “Item 18. Financial Statements”. The selected
consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011, and for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2010, is a summary of and is derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements which are not included in this annual report. Our consolidated financial statements are
prepared and presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or “IFRS”,
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or the “IASB”.

This information should be read together with, and is qualified in its entirety by, our

consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in “Item 18. Financial Statements”.
You should also read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”.

1

2009

Year Ended December 31,
2011
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)

2012

2010

2013

STATEMENT OF PROFIT

OR LOSS

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vessel operating and

supervision costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . .
General and administrative

expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(Loss)/profit from operations. . . .
Financial costs and gain/(loss)

on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on financial investments . . .
Share of profit of associate. . . . . .
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries .
Total other income/(expense) . . .

Profit for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Profit attributable to owners of

the Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss attributable to non-

controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . .

Earnings per share, basic and

diluted(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average number of

shares, basic(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average number of

shares, diluted(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Dividends declared per

share(1)(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

8,528

$

39,832

$

66,471

$

68,542

$

157,240

(3,056)
(126)

(6,241)

(894)

(72)
52
4,689
635
—
5,304

4,409

4,409

$

$

(8,644)
(6,560)

(11,571)

13,056

(5,046)
121
—
1,460
—
(3,465)

9,591

9,849

$

$

(12,946)
(12,827)

(15,997)

24,701

(12,356)
42
—
1,312
25
(10,978)

13,723

14,040

$

$

(14,646)
(13,065)

(20,380)

20,451

(18,453)
1,174
—
1,078
—
(16,201)

4,250

4,250

$

$

(34,919)
(29,322)

(21,597)

71,402

(16,354)
411
—
1,470
—
(14,473)

56,929

56,929

— $

(258) $

(317) $

— $

—

0.12

$

0.25

$

0.36

$

0.07

$

0.91

35,700,000

35,700,000

35,837,297

56,093,775

62,863,665

35,700,000

39,101,496

39,101,496

56,695,519

62,863,665

— $

0.44

$

0.22

$

0.11

$

0.45

2009

2010

As of December 31,
2011
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

2012

2013

$

$

$

$

$

STATEMENT OF

FINANCIAL POSITION
DATA

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . .
Short-term investments. . . . . . . . .
Investment in associate(3). . . . . . .
Tangible fixed assets(4) . . . . . . . . .
Vessels under construction . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings—current portion . . .
Borrowings—non-current

portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share capital(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity attributable to owners

of the Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-controlling interest . . . . . . . .
Total equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

7,240
—
7,113
475
246,445
277,924
4,191

170,869
391

91,017
—
91,017

$ 20,093
—
6,528
438,902
109,070
607,013
24,277

256,788
391

290,414
—
290,414

$110,978
104,674
6,856
426,880
217,322
908,768
25,753

228,515
629

603,271
—
603,271

$ 103,798
4,500
6,326
1,529,720
120,295
1,816,679
100,320

1,014,754
629

639,533
—
639,533

$ 23,270
—
7,003
450,265
18,700
512,005
22,640

287,597
391

171,733
9,199
180,932

2

2009

2010

Year Ended December 31,
2011
2012
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

2013

CASH FLOW DATA
Net cash from operating activities . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . .
Net cash from financing activities . . . . . . . . . . .

$

134
(32,167)
33,796

$ 25,633
(212,806)
203,203

$ 27,001
(86,464)
56,286

$ 24,918
(212,621)
278,811

$ 86,745
(935,516)
840,481

FLEET DATA(5)
Number of managed ships at end of period .
Average number of managed ships during

period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Number of owned ships at end of period . . . .
Average number of owned ships during

period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average age of owned ships (years) . . . . . . . . .
Total calendar days for owned fleet . . . . . . . . .
Total operating days for owned fleet . . . . . . . .

2009

8

8.0
—

—
—
—
—

Year Ended December 31,
2011

2010

2012

14

10.3
2

1.0
0.5
372
372

14

14.0
2

2.0
1.5
730
730

14

14.0
2

2.0
2.5
732
732

2013

20

16.9
8

5.0
1.7
1,832
1,808

(1) Gives effect to the 238-for-1 share split effected on March 13, 2012.

(2) Of the total $17.25 million, $8.5 million, $6.9 million and $28.3 million dividends declared, respectively, during the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, $16.77 million, $0.77 million, $6.9 million and $28.3 million, respectively,
was paid in cash and the remainder was contributed to the capital of the Company by our existing majority shareholder.

(3) Consists of our 25% ownership interest in Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. or “Egypt LNG”.

(4) Includes delivered ships (including drydocking component of ship cost) as well as office property and other tangible assets,

less accumulated depreciation. See Note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual
report.

(5) Presentation of fleet data does not include newbuildings on order during the relevant periods. The data presented

regarding our owned fleet includes only our wholly owned ships delivered prior to December 31, 2013. The data presented
regarding our managed fleet includes our owned fleet as well as ships owned by BG Group and Egypt LNG that are
operating under our management.

3

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2013:

This information should be read in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review

and Prospects”, and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included
elsewhere in this annual report.

As of
December 31, 2013
(in thousands
of U.S. dollars)

Debt:(1)
Borrowings—current portion(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings—non-current portion(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Equity attributable to shareholders:
Share capital(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contributed surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retained Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total equity attributable to shareholders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total capitalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$
$

$

$

$

100,320
1,014,754
1,115,074

629
614,964
(3,428)
27,368

639,533

1,754,607

(1) Our indebtedness, other than our NOK 500 million bond, or the “Bond”, is secured by mortgages on our owned ships and

is guaranteed by the Company. The Bond (the carrying amount of which, net of unamortized financing costs as of
December 31, 2013 is $79.78 million) is unsecured. Debt presented does not include: (a) our scheduled debt payments
totaling $14.65 million since December 31, 2013, and (b) our drawdown of $2.68 million under the $50 million revolving
facility with DNB Bank ASA, UBS AG, National Bank of Greece S.A., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and
Skandinaviska Ensklida Banken AB (publ). See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and
Capital Resources—Credit Facilities” for more information about our credit facilities.

(2) Borrowings presented at December 31, 2013, are shown net of $23.16 million of loan issuance costs that are being

amortized over the term of the borrowings.

(3) Does not include (a) any shares that may be issued under the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan and
(b) 13,242,460 shares issued on January 22, 2014 upon completion of our follow-on public equity offering and concurrent
private placement at a price of $15.75 per share. The net proceeds from the public offering and the private placement,
after deducting underwriting discounts and other offering expenses, were approximately $199.4 million. At December 31,
2013, our issued and outstanding share capital consisted of 62,863,166 shares.

4

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Industry

Our future performance depends on continued growth in LNG production and demand for LNG and
LNG shipping.

Our future performance, including our ability to profitably expand our fleet beyond delivery of

our seven contracted newbuildings, will depend on continued growth in LNG production and the
demand for LNG and LNG shipping. A complete LNG project includes production, liquefaction,
storage, regasification and distribution facilities, in addition to the marine transportation of LNG.
Increased infrastructure investment has led to an expansion of LNG production capacity in recent
years, but material delays in the construction of new liquefaction facilities could constrain the
amount of LNG available for shipping, reducing ship utilization. The rate of growth of the LNG
industry has fluctuated due to several factors, including the global economic crisis and continued
economic uncertainty, fluctuations in the price of natural gas and other sources of energy, the
continued acceleration in natural gas production from unconventional sources in regions such as
North America and the highly complex and capital intensive nature of new or expanded LNG
projects, including liquefaction projects. Continued growth in LNG production and demand for LNG
and LNG shipping could be negatively affected by a number of factors, including:

• increases in interest rates or other events that may affect the availability of sufficient

financing for LNG projects on commercially reasonable terms;

• increases in the cost of natural gas derived from LNG relative to the cost of natural gas

generally;

• increases in the production levels of low-cost natural gas in domestic natural gas consuming
markets, which could further depress prices for natural gas in those markets and make LNG
uneconomical;

• increases in the production of natural gas in areas linked by pipelines to consuming areas, the
extension of existing, or the development of new pipeline systems in markets we may serve,
or the conversion of existing non-natural gas pipelines to natural gas pipelines in those
markets;

• decreases in the consumption of natural gas due to increases in its price, decreases in the

price of alternative energy sources or other factors making consumption of natural gas less
attractive;

• any significant explosion, spill or other incident involving an LNG facility or carrier;
• infrastructure constraints such as delays in the construction of liquefaction facilities, the

inability of project owners or operators to obtain governmental approvals to construct or
operate LNG facilities, as well as community or political action group resistance to new LNG
infrastructure due to concerns about the environment, safety and terrorism;

• labor or political unrest or military conflicts affecting existing or proposed areas of LNG

production or regasification;

• decreases in the price of LNG, which might decrease the expected returns relating to

investments in LNG projects;

• new taxes or regulations affecting LNG production or liquefaction that make LNG production

less attractive; or

• negative global or regional economic or political conditions, particularly in LNG consuming

regions, which could reduce energy consumption or its growth.

Reduced demand for LNG or LNG shipping, or any reduction or limitation in LNG production

capacity, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to secure future time charters upon

5

expiration or early termination of our current charter arrangements, for any ships for which we have
not yet secured charters, or for any new ships we acquire beyond our contracted newbuildings,
which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Demand for LNG shipping could be significantly affected by volatile natural gas prices and the
overall demand for natural gas.

Natural gas prices are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control,

including but not limited to the following:
• worldwide demand for natural gas;
• the cost of exploration, development, production, transportation and distribution of natural

gas;

• expectations regarding future energy prices for both natural gas and other sources of energy;
• the level of worldwide LNG production and exports;
• government laws and regulations, including but not limited to environmental protection laws

and regulations;

• local and international political, economic and weather conditions;
• political and military conflicts; and
• the availability and cost of alternative energy sources, including alternate sources of natural

gas in gas importing and consuming countries.

Natural gas prices have historically varied substantially between regions. This price disparity
between producing and consuming regions supports demand for LNG shipping and any convergence
of natural gas prices would adversely affect demand for LNG shipping.

Fluctuations in overall LNG demand growth could adversely affect our ability to secure future time
charters.

According to Clarkson Research Services Limited, or “Clarkson Research”, the world seaborne

trade in LNG has grown strongly over the past two decades, with a compound annual growth rate of
7.1% between 1990 and 2011, with particularly strong growth in 2010 and 2011 as LNG demand
increased and new and existing facilities were able to commence production. However, overall trade
volumes declined by 2.8% in 2012, primarily due to lower production as a result of planned and
unplanned outages at various liquefaction sites and the weakness in the world economy. Based on
preliminary trade statistics, world seaborne trade in LNG trade is estimated to have declined by a
further 0.4% in 2013. This marginal fall in trade is a result of limited liquefaction capacity growth
over the course of the year, coupled with import declines in both the United States and Europe
offsetting growth in non-OECD Asia.

Continued economic uncertainty and the continued acceleration of unconventional natural gas

production could have an adverse effect on our ability to secure future term charters.

Our future growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with existing customers, establish
relationships with new customers and obtain new time charter contracts, for which we will face
substantial competition from established companies with significant resources and potential new
entrants.

We are seeking to enter into time charter contracts for (i) two of our newbuildings scheduled
for delivery in 2014 and 2015, (ii) the GasLog Chelsea, that operates in the spot market, and (iii)
the GasLog Skagen, that from 2016 is on a seasonal contract (i.e., employed for seven months and
available to accept other charters for five months per year). We will also seek to enter into new
time charter contracts upon the expiration or early termination of our existing charter arrangements,
and upon any expansion of our fleet of owned ships beyond our contracted newbuildings. In
addition, we may seek to expand the customer base for our ship management services. The process

6

of obtaining charters for LNG carriers is highly competitive and generally involves an intensive
screening procedure and competitive bids, which often extends for several months. We believe LNG
carrier time charters are awarded based upon a variety of factors relating to the ship and the ship
operator, including:

• size, age, technical specifications and condition of the ship;
• efficiency of ship operation;
• LNG shipping experience and quality of ship operations;
• shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer service;
• technical ability and reputation for operation of highly specialized ships;
• quality and experience of officers and crew;
• safety record;
• the ability to finance ships at competitive rates and financial stability generally;
• relationships with shipyards and the ability to get suitable berths;
• construction management experience, including the ability to obtain on-time delivery of new

ships according to customer specifications; and

• competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.
We expect substantial competition for providing marine transportation services for potential
LNG projects from a number of experienced companies, including other independent ship owners as
well as state-sponsored entities and major energy companies that own and operate LNG carriers and
may compete with independent owners by using their fleets to carry LNG for third parties. Some of
these competitors have significantly greater financial resources and larger fleets than we have. A
number of marine transportation companies—including companies with strong reputations and
extensive resources and experience—have entered the LNG transportation market in recent years,
and there are other ship owners and managers who may also attempt to participate in the LNG
market in the future. This increased competition may cause greater price competition for time
charters. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to expand our relationships with existing
customers or to obtain new customers on a profitable basis, if at all, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Hire rates for LNG carriers may fluctuate substantially. If rates are lower when we are seeking a
new charter, our revenues and cash flows may decline.

Our ability from time to time to charter or re-charter any ship at attractive rates will depend

on, among other things, the prevailing economic conditions in the LNG industry. Hire rates for
LNG carriers may fluctuate over time as a result of changes in the supply-demand balance relating
to current and future ship capacity. This supply-demand relationship largely depends on a number of
factors outside our control. The LNG charter market is connected to world natural gas prices and
energy markets, which we cannot predict. A substantial or extended decline in demand for natural
gas or LNG could adversely affect our ability to charter or re-charter our ships at acceptable rates
or to acquire and profitably operate new ships. Hire rates for newbuildings are correlated with the
price of newbuildings. Hire rates at a time when we may be seeking new charters may be lower
than the hire rates at which our ships are currently chartered. If hire rates are lower when we are
seeking a new charter, our revenues and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our
shareholders, may decline, as we may only be able to enter into new charters at reduced or
unprofitable rates or may not be able to re-charter our ship, or we may have to secure a charter in
the spot market, where hire rates are more volatile. Prolonged periods of low charter hire rates or
low ship utilization could also have a material adverse effect on the value of our assets.

7

An oversupply of LNG carriers may lead to a reduction in the charter hire rates we are able to
obtain when seeking charters in the future.

Driven in part by an increase in LNG production capacity, the market supply of LNG carriers

has been increasing as a result of the construction of new ships. According to Clarkson Research,
from the start of 1996 to the start of 2011, the global fleet of LNG carriers grew from 90 ships (9.4
million cbm) to 361 ships (51.6 million cbm), due to the construction and delivery of new LNG
carriers. Although the global newbuilding order book dropped steeply between mid-2007 and the
start of 2011, orders for an estimated 132 newbuilding LNG carriers were placed in the period from
the start of 2011 to the start of March 2014, compared to a total of just 10 newbuilding LNG
carriers between 2008 and 2010. As of March 1, 2014, the LNG carrier order book totaled 114 ships
with an aggregate capacity of 17.7 million cbm. At 32% of the global fleet (in terms of carrying
capacity), the current order book is notably smaller than the record highs recorded in mid-2006
when it was almost 100% of the existing global fleet. Nevertheless, it is substantially larger than it
was at the start of 2011 (approximately 6% of the existing global fleet). This and any future
expansion of the global LNG carrier fleet may have a negative impact on charter hire rates, ship
utilization and ship values, which could be amplified if the expansion of LNG production capacity
does not keep pace with fleet growth.

If charter hire rates are lower when we are seeking new time charters, our revenues and cash

flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders, may decline.

If an active short-term or spot LNG carrier charter market continues to develop, our revenues and
cash flows may become more volatile and may decline following expiration or early termination of
our current charter arrangements.

Most shipping requirements for new LNG projects continue to be provided on a multi-year

basis, though the level of spot voyages and short-term time charters of less than 12 months in
duration has grown in the past few years. If an active short-term or spot charter market continues to
develop, we may enter into short-term time charters upon expiration or early termination of our
current charters, for any ships for which we have not secured charters, or for any new ships we
acquire beyond our contracted newbuildings. As a result, our revenues and cash flows may become
more volatile. In addition, an active short-term or spot charter market may require us to enter into
charters based on changing market prices, as opposed to contracts based on fixed rates, which could
result in a decrease in our revenues and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our
shareholders, if we enter into charters during periods when the market price for shipping LNG is
depressed.

Further technological advancements and other innovations affecting LNG carriers could reduce the
charter hire rates we are able to obtain when seeking new employment, and this could adversely
impact the value of our assets.

The charter rates, asset value and operational life of an LNG carrier are determined by a
number of factors, including the ship’s efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency
includes speed and fuel economy. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related
docking facilities and pass through canals and straits. Physical life is related to the original design
and construction, the ongoing maintenance and the impact of operational stresses on the asset. Ship
and engine designs are continually evolving. At such time as newer designs are developed and
accepted in the market, these newer vessels may be found to be more efficient or more flexible or
have longer physical lives than our ships. As a result, competition from these more technologically
advanced LNG carriers could adversely affect our ability to charter or re-charter our ships and the
charter hire rates we will be able to secure when we seek to charter or re-charter our ships, and
could also reduce the resale value of our ships. This could adversely affect our revenues and cash
flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

8

Risks associated with operating and managing ocean-going ships could affect our business and
reputation.

The operation and management of ocean-going ships carries inherent risks. These risks include

the possibility of:

• marine disaster;
• piracy;
• environmental accidents;
• adverse weather conditions;
• grounding, fire, explosions and collisions;
• cargo and property loss or damage;
• business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, war, terrorism, disease and

quarantine, or political action in various countries; and

• work stoppages or other labor problems with crew members serving on our ships.
An accident involving any of our owned or managed ships could result in any of the following:
• death or injury to persons, loss of property or environmental damage;
• delays in the delivery of cargo;
• loss of revenues from termination of charter contracts or ship management agreements;
• governmental fines, penalties or restrictions on conducting business;
• litigation with our employees, customers or third parties;
• higher insurance rates; and
• damage to our reputation and customer relationships generally.
Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,

results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur to our property or result from our
operations.

The operation of any ship includes risks such as mechanical failure, personal injury, collision,

fire, contact with floating objects, property loss or damage, cargo loss or damage and business
interruption due to a number of reasons, including political circumstances in foreign countries,
hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of a marine disaster,
including explosion, spills and other environmental mishaps, and other liabilities arising from owning,
operating or managing ships in international trade.

Although we carry protection and indemnity, hull and machinery and loss of hire insurance
covering our owned ships consistent with industry standards, we can give no assurance that we are
adequately insured against all risks or that our insurers will pay a particular claim. We also may be
unable to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future. Even
if our insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to obtain a timely
replacement ship in the event of a loss of a ship. Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm
our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for
dividends to shareholders. Similarly, although we carry ship manager insurance in connection with
our management of third-party ships, we can give no assurance that such insurance will adequately
insure us against all risks associated with our ship management services, that our insurers will pay a
particular claim or that we will be able to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially
reasonable rates in the future.

In addition, some of our insurance coverage is maintained through mutual protection and

indemnity associations, and as a member of such associations we may be required to make
additional payments over and above budgeted premiums if member claims exceed association
reserves.

9

The required drydocking of our ships could be more expensive and time consuming than we
anticipate, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

Drydockings of our owned ships require significant capital expenditures and result in loss of

revenue while our ships are off-hire. Any significant increase in either the number of off-hire days
due to such drydockings or in the costs of any repairs carried out during the drydockings could have
a material adverse effect on our profitability and our cash flows. We may not be able to accurately
predict the time required to drydock any of our ships or any unanticipated problems that may arise.
If more than one of our ships is required to be out of service at the same time, or if a ship is
drydocked longer than expected or if the cost of repairs during the drydocking is greater than
budgeted, our results of operations and our cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our
shareholders, could be adversely affected.

Changes in global and regional economic conditions could adversely impact our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Weak global or regional economic conditions may negatively impact our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows in ways that we cannot predict. Our ability to expand
our fleet beyond our contracted newbuildings will be dependent on our ability to obtain financing to
fund the acquisition of additional ships. In addition, uncertainty about current and future global
economic conditions may cause our customers to defer projects in response to tighter credit,
decreased capital availability and declining customer confidence, which may negatively impact the
demand for our ships and services and could also result in defaults under our current charters or
termination of our ship management contracts. Global financial markets and economic conditions
have been volatile in recent years and remain subject to significant vulnerabilities. In particular,
despite recent measures taken by the European Union, concerns persist regarding the debt burden
of certain Eurozone countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations, and the overall
stability of the euro. Furthermore, a tightening of the credit markets may further negatively impact
our operations by affecting the solvency of our suppliers or customers which could lead to
disruptions in delivery of supplies such as equipment for conversions, cost increases for supplies,
accelerated payments to suppliers, customer bad debts or reduced revenues. Similarly, such market
conditions could affect lenders participating in our financing agreements, making them unable to
fulfill their commitments and obligations to the Company. Any reductions in activity owing to such
conditions or failure by our customers, suppliers or lenders to meet their contractual obligations to
the Company could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operation and cash
flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Disruptions in world financial markets could limit our ability to obtain future debt financing or
refinance existing debt.

Global financial markets and economic conditions have been disrupted and volatile in recent
years. Credit markets as well as the debt and equity capital markets were exceedingly distressed and
at certain times in recent years it was difficult to obtain financing and the cost of any available
financing increased significantly. If global financial markets and economic conditions significantly
deteriorate in the future, we may experience difficulties obtaining financing commitments, including
commitments to refinance our existing debt as substantial balloon payments come due under our
credit facilities, in the future if lenders are unwilling to extend financing to us or unable to meet
their funding obligations due to their own liquidity, capital or solvency issues. As a result, financing
may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. If financing is not available when needed, or is
available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our future obligations as they come
due. Our failure to obtain the funds for these capital expenditures could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including cash
available for dividends to our shareholders. In the absence of available financing, we also may be
unable to take advantage of further business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures.

10

Compliance with safety and other requirements imposed by classification societies may be very
costly and may adversely affect our business.

The hull and machinery of every commercial LNG carrier must be classed by a classification

society. The classification society certifies that the ship has been built and subsequently maintained
in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of that classification society. Moreover, every
ship must comply with all applicable international conventions and the regulations of the ship’s flag
state as verified by a classification society. Finally, each ship must successfully undergo periodic
surveys, including annual, intermediate and special surveys performed under the classification
society’s rules.

If any ship does not maintain its class, it will lose its insurance coverage and be unable to trade,

and the ship’s owner will be in breach of relevant covenants under its financing arrangements.
Failure to maintain the class of one or more of our ships could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for
dividends to our shareholders.

The LNG shipping industry is subject to substantial environmental and other regulations, which
may significantly limit our operations or increase our expenses.

Our operations are materially affected by extensive and changing international, national, state
and local environmental laws, regulations, treaties, conventions and standards which are in force in
international waters, or in the jurisdictional waters of the countries in which our ships operate and in
the countries in which our ships are registered. These requirements include those relating to
equipping and operating ships, providing security and minimizing or addressing impacts on the
environment from ship operations. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, substantial
costs in complying with these requirements, including costs for ship modifications and changes in
operating procedures. We also could incur substantial costs, including cleanup costs, civil and
criminal penalties and sanctions, the suspension or termination of operations and third-party claims
as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, such laws and regulations.

In addition, these requirements can affect the resale value or useful lives of our ships, require a

reduction in cargo capacity, necessitate ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions or
lead to decreased availability of insurance coverage for environmental matters. They could further
result in the denial of access to certain jurisdictional waters or ports or detention in certain ports.
We are required to obtain governmental approvals and permits to operate our ships. Delays in
obtaining such governmental approvals may increase our expenses, and the terms and conditions of
such approvals could materially and adversely affect our operations.

Additional laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to do business or

increase our operating costs, which could materially and adversely affect our business. For example,
new or amended legislation relating to ship recycling, sewage systems, emission control (including
emissions of greenhouse gases) as well as ballast water treatment and ballast water handling may be
adopted. The United States has recently enacted ballast water management system legislation and
regulations that require more stringent controls of air and water emissions from ocean-going ships.
Such legislation or regulations may require additional capital expenditures or operating expenses
(such as increased costs for low-sulfur fuel) in order for us to maintain our ships’ compliance with
international and/or national regulations. We also may become subject to additional laws and
regulations if we enter new markets or trades.

We also believe that the heightened environmental, quality and security concerns of insurance

underwriters, regulators and charterers will generally lead to additional regulatory requirements,
including enhanced risk assessment and security requirements, as well as greater inspection and
safety requirements on all LNG carriers in the marine transportation market. These requirements
are likely to add incremental costs to our operations, and the failure to comply with these
requirements may affect the ability of our ships to obtain and, possibly, recover from, insurance or
to obtain the required certificates for entry into the different ports where we operate.

11

Some environmental laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or
“OPA”, provide for potentially unlimited joint, several and/or strict liability for owners, operators
and demise or bareboat charterers for oil pollution and related damages. OPA applies to discharges
of any oil from a ship in U.S. waters, including discharges of fuel and lubricants from an LNG
carrier, even if the ships do not carry oil as cargo. In addition, many states in the United States
bordering a navigable waterway have enacted legislation providing for potentially unlimited strict
liability without regard to fault for the discharge of pollutants within their waters. We also are
subject to other laws and conventions outside the United States that provide for an owner or
operator of LNG carriers to bear strict liability for pollution, such as the Convention on Limitation
of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, or the “London Convention”.

Some of these laws and conventions, including OPA and the London Convention, may include

limitations on liability. However, the limitations may not be applicable in certain circumstances, such
as where a spill is caused by a ship owner’s or operator’s intentional or reckless conduct. These
limitations are also subject to periodic updates and may otherwise be amended in the future.

Compliance with OPA and other environmental laws and regulations also may result in ship

owners and operators incurring increased costs for additional maintenance and inspection
requirements, the development of contingency arrangements for potential spills, obtaining mandated
insurance coverage and meeting financial responsibility requirements.

Climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions may adversely impact our operations and markets.

Due to concern over the risks of climate change, a number of countries and the International

Maritime Organization, or “IMO”, have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory
frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emission from ships. These regulatory measures may include
adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards and incentives or
mandates for renewable energy. Although emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping
currently are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change, or the “Kyoto Protocol”, a new treaty may be adopted in the future that includes
additional restrictions on shipping emissions to those already adopted under the International
Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution from Ships, or the “MARPOL Convention”.
Compliance with future changes in laws and regulations relating to climate change could increase the
costs of operating and maintaining our ships and could require us to install new emission controls, as
well as acquire allowances, pay taxes related to our greenhouse gas emissions or administer and
manage a greenhouse gas emissions program. Revenue generation and strategic growth opportunities
may also be adversely affected.

Adverse effects upon the oil and gas industry relating to climate change, including growing

public concern about the environmental impact of climate change, may also have an effect on
demand for our services. For example, increased regulation of greenhouse gases or other concerns
relating to climate change may reduce the demand for oil and gas in the future or create greater
incentives for use of alternative energy sources. Any long-term material adverse effect on the oil and
gas industry could have significant financial and operational adverse impacts on our business that we
cannot predict with certainty at this time.

We operate our ships worldwide, which could expose us to political, governmental and economic
instability that could harm our business.

Because we operate our ships in the geographic areas where our customers do business, our

operations may be affected by political, governmental and economic conditions in the countries
where our ships operate or where they are registered. Any disruption caused by these factors could
harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In particular, our ships
frequent LNG terminals in countries including Egypt, Equatorial Guinea and Trinidad as well as
transit through the Gulf of Aden and the Strait of Malacca. Economic, political and governmental
conditions in these and other regions have from time to time resulted in military conflicts, terrorism,
attacks on ships, mining of waterways, piracy and other efforts to disrupt shipping. Future hostilities
or other political instability in the geographic regions where we operate or may operate could have

12

a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows,
including cash available for dividends to our shareholders. In addition, our business could also be
harmed by tariffs, trade embargoes and other economic sanctions by the United States or other
countries against countries in the Middle East, Southeast Asia or elsewhere as a result of terrorist
attacks, hostilities or diplomatic or political pressures that limit trading activities with those
countries.

Terrorist attacks, international hostilities and piracy could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Terrorist attacks, piracy and the current conflicts in the Middle East, and other current and
future conflicts, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders. The continuing hostilities in the
Middle East may lead to additional acts of terrorism, further regional conflicts, other armed actions
around the world and civil disturbance in the United States or elsewhere, which may contribute to
further instability in the global financial markets. These uncertainties could also adversely affect our
ability to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

In the past, political conflicts have also resulted in attacks on ships, mining of waterways and

other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. Acts of
terrorism and piracy have also affected ships trading in regions such as the South China Sea and the
Gulf of Aden. Since 2008, the frequency of piracy incidents against commercial shipping vessels has
increased significantly, particularly in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia. Any terrorist
attacks targeted at ships may in the future negatively materially affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows and could directly impact our ships or our customers.

We currently employ armed guards on board certain vessels operating in areas that may be

prone to hijacking or terrorist attacks. The presence of armed guards may increase the risk of
damage, injury or loss of life in connection with any attacks on our vessels, in addition to increasing
crew costs.

We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from acts of terrorism, piracy, regional

conflicts and other armed actions, including losses relating to the employment of armed guards.

LNG facilities, shipyards, ships, pipelines and gas fields could be targets of future terrorist
attacks or piracy. Any such attacks could lead to, among other things, bodily injury or loss of life, as
well as damage to the ships or other property, increased ship operating costs, including insurance
costs, reductions in the supply of LNG and the inability to transport LNG to or from certain
locations. Terrorist attacks, war or other events beyond our control that adversely affect the
production, storage or transportation of LNG to be shipped by us could entitle our customers to
terminate our charter contracts in certain circumstances, which would harm our cash flows and our
business.

Terrorist attacks, or the perception that LNG facilities and LNG carriers are potential terrorist

targets, could materially and adversely affect expansion of LNG infrastructure and the continued
supply of LNG. Concern that LNG facilities may be targeted for attack by terrorists has contributed
significantly to local community and environmental group resistance to the construction of a number
of LNG facilities, primarily in North America. If a terrorist incident involving an LNG facility or
LNG carrier did occur, in addition to the possible effects identified in the previous paragraph, the
incident may adversely affect the construction of additional LNG facilities and could lead to the
temporary or permanent closing of various LNG facilities currently in operation.

In the future, the ships we own or manage could be required to call on ports located in countries
that are subject to restrictions imposed by the United States and other governments.

The United States and other governments and their agencies impose sanctions and embargoes
on certain countries and maintain lists of countries they consider to be state sponsors of terrorism.
For example, in 2010, the United States enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability
and Divestment Act, or “CISADA”, which expanded the scope of the former Iran Sanctions Act.

13

Among other things, CISADA expanded the application of the prohibitions imposed by the U.S.
government to non-U.S. companies, such as us, and limits the ability of companies and persons to do
business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined
petroleum or petroleum products, as well as LNG.

In 2012, President Obama signed Executive Order 13608 which prohibits foreign persons from

violating or attempting to violate, or causing a violation of any sanctions in effect against Iran or
facilitating any deceptive transactions for or on behalf of any person subject to U.S. sanctions. The
Secretary of the Treasury may prohibit any transactions or dealings, including any U.S. capital
markets financing, involving any person found to be in violation of Executive Order 13608. Also in
2012, the U.S. enacted the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, or the
“ITRA”, which created new sanctions and strengthened existing sanctions. Among other things, the
ITRA intensifies existing sanctions regarding the provision of goods, services, infrastructure or
technology to Iran’s petroleum or petrochemical sector. The ITRA also includes a provision
requiring the President of the United States to impose five or more sanctions from Section 6(a) of
the Iran Sanctions Act, as amended, on a person the President determines is a controlling beneficial
owner of, or otherwise owns, operates, or controls or insures a vessel that was used to transport
crude oil from Iran to another country and (1) if the person is a controlling beneficial owner of the
vessel, the person had actual knowledge the vessel was so used or (2) if the person otherwise owns,
operates, or controls, or insures the vessel, the person knew or should have known the vessel was so
used. Such a person could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including exclusion from U.S. capital
markets, exclusion from financial transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and exclusion of such
person’s vessels from U.S. ports for up to two years. The ITRA also includes a requirement that
issuers of securities must disclose to the SEC in their annual and quarterly reports filed after
February 6, 2013 whether the issuer or “any affiliate” has “knowingly” engaged in certain sanctioned
activities involving Iran during the timeframe covered by the report. Finally, in January 2013, the
U.S. enacted the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 which expanded the scope of
U.S. sanctions on any person that is part of Iran’s energy, shipping or shipbuilding sector and
operators of ports in Iran, and imposes penalties on any person who facilitates or otherwise
knowingly provides significant financial, material or other support to these entities.

Although the ships we own and those we manage have not called on ports in countries subject

to sanctions or embargoes or in countries identified as state sponsors of terrorism, including Iran,
North Korea and Syria, we cannot assure you that these ships will not call on ports in these
countries in the future. While we intend to maintain compliance with all sanctions and embargoes
applicable to us, U.S. and international sanctions and embargo laws and regulations do not
necessarily apply to the same countries or proscribe the same activities, which may make compliance
difficult. Additionally, the scope of certain laws may be unclear, and these laws may be subject to
changing interpretations and application and may be amended or strengthened from time to time,
including by adding or removing countries from the proscribed lists. Violations of sanctions and
embargo laws and regulations could result in fines or other penalties and could result in some
investors deciding, or being required, to divest their investment, or not to invest, in us.

Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other anti-bribery legislation in
other jurisdictions could result in fines, criminal penalties, contract terminations and an adverse
effect on our business.

We may operate in a number of countries through the world, including countries known to have
a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-
corruption laws and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is consistent and in
full compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, or the “FCPA”. We are
subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers,
directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-
corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions,
civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely
affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged
violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting,

14

investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time
and attention of our senior management.

Reliability of suppliers may limit our ability to obtain supplies and services when needed.

We rely, and will in the future rely, on a significant supply of consumables, spare parts and

equipment to operate, maintain, repair and upgrade our fleet of ships. Delays in delivery or
unavailability of supplies could result in off-hire days due to consequent delays in the repair and
maintenance of our fleet. This would negatively impact our revenues and cash flows. Cost increases
could also negatively impact our future operations, although the impact of significant cost increases
may be mitigated to some extent with respect to the vessels that are employed under charter
contracts with automatic periodic adjustment provisions or cost review provisions.

Governments could requisition our ships during a period of war or emergency, resulting in loss of
earnings.

The government of a jurisdiction where one or more of our ships are registered could

requisition for title or seize our ships. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control
of a ship and becomes its owner. Also, a government could requisition our ships for hire.
Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a ship and effectively becomes the
charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or
emergency, although governments may elect to requisition ships in other circumstances. Although we
would expect to be entitled to government compensation in the event of a requisition of one or
more of our ships, the amount and timing of payments, if any, would be uncertain. A government
requisition of one or more of our ships would result in off-hire days under our time charters and
may cause us to breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities, and could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Maritime claimants could arrest our ships, which could interrupt our cash flows.

Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a ship, shippers or receivers of cargo and

other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a ship for unsatisfied debts, claims or
damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lienholder may enforce its lien by arresting a ship. The
arrest or attachment of one or more of our ships which is not timely discharged could cause us to
default on a charter or breach covenants in certain of our credit facilities and, to the extent such
arrest or attachment is not covered by our protection and indemnity insurance, could require us to
pay large sums of money to have the arrest or attachment lifted. Any of these occurrences could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Additionally, in some jurisdictions, such as the Republic of South Africa, under the “sister ship”
theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the ship that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien
and any “associated” ship, which is any ship owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants
could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one ship in our fleet for claims relating to another of
our ships.

We may be subject to litigation that could have an adverse effect on us.

We may in the future be involved from time to time in litigation matters. These matters may

include, among other things, contract disputes, personal injury claims, environmental claims or
proceedings, toxic tort claims, employment matters and governmental claims for taxes or duties, as
well as other litigation that arises in the ordinary course of our business. We cannot predict with
certainty the outcome of any claim or other litigation matter. The ultimate outcome of any litigation
matter and the potential costs associated with prosecuting or defending such lawsuits, including the
diversion of management’s attention to these matters, could have an adverse effect on us and, in the

15

event of litigation that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on us, could
lead to an event of default under certain of our credit facilities.

Risks Related to Our Business

Any limitation in the availability or operation of our ships could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our owned fleet consists of eight LNG carriers that are in operation and seven newbuildings on

order. In addition, in January 2014 we announced an agreement with Methane Services Limited, or
“MSL”, an affiliate of BG Group, to purchase three 145,000 cbm steam-powered LNG carriers, and
to charter those ships back to BG Group for six-year initial terms, or the “Pending Vessel
Acquisition”. If any of our ships is unable to generate revenues for any significant period of time for
any reason, including unexpected periods of off-hire, early charter termination or failure to secure
employment for any ships for which we have not secured charters, our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders, could
be materially and adversely affected. The impact of any limitation in the operation of our ships or
any early charter termination would be amplified during the period prior to delivery of our
newbuildings, as a substantial portion of our cash flows and income are dependent on the revenues
earned by the chartering of our eight LNG carriers in operation and the three ships to be acquired
under the Pending Vessel Acquisition. In addition, the costs of ship repairs are unpredictable and
can be substantial. In the event of repair costs that are not covered by our insurance policies, we
may have to pay for such repair costs, which would decrease our earnings and cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Our vessel ownership segment has a limited operating history.

We have provided LNG ship management services through our subsidiary GasLog LNG

Services Ltd. or “GasLog LNG Services” since 2001, but our vessel ownership operating segment has
a more limited operating history. The principal assets of our vessel ownership segment are our eight
wholly owned LNG carriers delivered in 2010 and 2013. As we take delivery of our seven
newbuildings on order and the three ships to be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition, an
increasingly large portion of our operating results will depend on the performance of our vessel
ownership segment. Accordingly, we expect our future operating results to differ materially from our
historical operating results.

We depend upon two customers for nearly all of our revenues. The loss of either or both of these
customers would result in a significant loss of revenues and could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We have historically derived nearly all of our revenues from one customer, BG Group plc or

“BG Group”. For the year ended December 31, 2013, BG Group accounted for 90.7% of our
revenues. Following the delivery of our seven new LNG carriers on order and the three ships to be
acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition, they will continue to be a key customer, as four of
our newbuildings and the three ships to be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition will be
chartered to a subsidiary of BG Group upon delivery for a total of 13 ships chartered to BG Group.
Of the remaining three newbuildings, one will be chartered to a subsidiary of Shell. We could lose a
customer or the benefits of our time charter or ship management arrangements for many different
reasons, including if the customer is unable or unwilling to make charter hire or other payments to
us because of a deterioration in its financial condition, disagreements with us or otherwise. If either
or both of these customers terminates its charters, chooses not to re-charter our ships after the
initial charter terms or is unable to perform under its charters and we are not able to find
replacement charters, we will suffer a loss of revenues that could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for
dividends to our shareholders. Our revenues would also be impacted if BG Group terminates or is
unable to perform under our ship management contracts.

16

Any charter termination could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.

Our charterers have the right to terminate a ship’s time charter in certain circumstances,

such as:

• loss of the ship or damage to it beyond repair;
• if the ship is off-hire for any reason other than scheduled drydocking for a period exceeding
90 consecutive days, or for more than 90 days or 110 days, depending on the charter, in any
one-year period;

• defaults by us in our obligations under the charter; or
• the outbreak of war or hostilities involving two or more major nations, such as the United
States or the People’s Republic of China, that would materially and adversely affect the
trading of the ship for a period of at least 30 days.

A termination right under one ship’s time charter would not automatically give the charterer the

right to terminate its other charter contracts with us. However, a charter termination could
materially affect our relationship with the customer and our reputation in the LNG shipping
industry, and in some circumstances the event giving rise to the termination right could potentially
impact multiple charters. Accordingly, the existence of any right of termination could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows,
including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

If we lose a charter, we may be unable to obtain a new time charter on terms as favorable to
us or with a charterer of comparable standing, particularly if we are seeking new time charters at a
time when charter rates in the LNG industry are depressed. Consequently, we may have an
increased exposure to the volatile spot market, which is highly competitive and subject to significant
price fluctuations. In the event that we are unable to re-deploy a ship for which a charter has been
terminated, we will not receive any revenues from that ship, and we may be required to pay
expenses necessary to maintain the ship in proper operating condition. In addition, in the event of a
charter termination we could be required under certain of our credit facilities to deposit cash in an
account held with the applicable lender until we have obtained a new time charter on terms
acceptable to such lender, which could restrict our cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Our ship management agreements may be terminated with limited advance notice.

Unlike our time charters, our ship management agreements with a subsidiary of BG Group and
Egypt LNG may be terminated at any time by either party with a short period of advance notice. In
the event that a ship management agreement is terminated by BG Group other than in connection
with the sale of a ship, BG Group would generally be entitled to immediately terminate the ship
management agreements for the other ships we manage on its behalf. If a customer were to
terminate our ship management agreements, we may be unable to find new customers for our ship
management services or we may choose not to continue providing ship management services to
third-party customers, which could adversely impact our revenues and cash flows, including cash
available for dividends to our shareholders.

Due to our lack of diversification, adverse developments in the LNG transportation industry could
adversely affect our business, particularly if such developments occur at a time when we are seeking
a new charter.

Due to our lack of diversification, an adverse development in the LNG transportation industry
could have a significantly greater impact on our business, particularly if such developments occur at
a time when our ships are not under charter or nearing the end of their charters, than if we
maintained more diverse assets or lines of businesses.

17

Our contracts for the seven newbuildings we have on order are subject to risks that could cause
delays in the delivery of the ships, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash
flows.

Our seven contracted newbuildings are scheduled to be delivered to us on various dates
between 2014 and 2016. Significant delays in the delivery of one or more of these ships, which are
expected to generate a substantial portion of our contracted revenue in future years, would delay
our receipt of revenues under the related time charters. For prolonged delays, the customer may
terminate the charter and, in addition to the resulting loss of revenues, we may be responsible for
additional substantial liquidated damages, which could adversely affect our anticipated results of
operations and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders. In addition, the
delivery of any of these ships with substantial defects or unexpected operational problems could
have similar consequences.

The delivery of a newbuilding could be delayed because of numerous factors, including, but not

limited to:

• shortages of equipment, materials or skilled labor;
• delays in the receipt of necessary construction materials, such as steel, or equipment, such as

engines or generators;

• failure of equipment to meet quality and/or performance standards;
• the shipyard’s over-committing to new ships to be constructed;
• changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards;
• political or economic disturbances;
• financial or operating difficulties experienced by equipment vendors or the shipyard;
• required changes to the original ship specifications;
• inability to obtain required permits or approvals;
• disputes with the shipyard;
• inability to finance the construction or conversion of the vessels;
• work stoppages and other labor disputes; and
• adverse weather conditions or any other events of force majeure, including war or hostilities

between South Korea, where we have ships on order at Samsung Heavy Industries, and North
Korea.

GasLog cannot assure that it will complete the Pending Vessel Acquisition.

If GasLog cannot complete the purchase of any of the three ships to be acquired under the

Pending Vessel Acquisition for any reason, GasLog will have the discretion to apply the available
funds for general corporate purposes, including the acquisition of other ships. Any alternative use of
proceeds may not generate as much cash flow as the ships to be acquired in the Pending Vessel
Acquisition. For more information on the Pending Vessel Acquisition, see “Item 4. Information on
the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”.

As we take delivery of our newbuildings, we will need to expand our staff and crew. If we cannot
recruit and retain employees and provide adequate compensation, our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.

Our ability to acquire and retain customers depends on a number of factors, including our
ability to man our ships with masters, officers and crews of suitable experience in operating LNG
carriers. As we take delivery of our newbuildings, we expect to hire a significant number of
seafarers qualified to man and operate our new ships, as well as additional shoreside personnel. As
the global LNG carrier fleet continues to grow, we expect the demand for technically skilled and
experienced officers and crew to increase. This could lead to an industry-wide shortfall of qualified

18

personnel, resulting in increased crew costs, which could constrain our ability to recruit suitable
employees to operate our LNG carriers within our budget parameters.

Material increases in crew costs could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, if we cannot recruit and retain sufficient numbers of quality on-board seafaring
personnel, we may not be able to fully utilize our expanded fleet, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

We must make substantial capital expenditures to acquire the seven newbuildings we have on order
and any additional ships we may acquire in the future.

We are obligated to make substantial capital expenditures to fund our commitments for the
seven newbuildings we have on order. We are scheduled to take delivery of the ships on various
dates between 2014 and 2016. As of March 26, 2014, the total remaining balance of the contract
prices for the seven ships was $1.26 billion, which amounts are payable under each shipbuilding
contract in installments upon the attainment of certain specified milestones. The largest portion of
the purchase price for each ship will come due upon its delivery to us from the shipyard. We intend
to fund these commitments with available cash, cash from operations, and borrowings under our
loan agreement with an aggregate undrawn amount of $435 million as of March 26, 2014. As of
March 26, 2014, financing was not secured for $798 million related to the remaining balance of the
contract price of four of our ships.

To the extent that we are unable to draw down the amounts committed under our credit

facilities, whether due to our failure to comply with the terms of such facilities including vessel
employment conditions or the lender’s failure to fund the committed amounts, we will need to find
alternative financing. If we are unable to find alternative financing, we will not be capable of
funding all of our commitments for capital expenditures relating to our seven contracted
newbuildings. In the event that we fail to meet our payment obligations under a shipbuilding
contract, we would be in default under the applicable contract and the shipbuilder would have the
option of cancelling the contract and retaining any previously funded installment payments, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

In addition, we may choose to make substantial capital expenditures to expand the size of our
fleet in the future. In order to exercise our options with Samsung Heavy Industries to purchase up
to six additional newbuildings, we would need to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us. We
expect to finance the cost of any new ships through available cash, cash from operations and debt or
equity financings. Our ability to obtain bank financing or to access the capital markets may be
limited by our financial condition at the time of any such financing or offering, as well as by adverse
market conditions resulting from, among other things, general economic conditions, changes in the
LNG industry and further contingencies and uncertainties that are beyond our control. Even if we
are successful in obtaining necessary funds, the terms of any debt financings could limit our ability
to further expand our fleet and to pay dividends to our shareholders.

We may have difficulty further expanding our fleet in the future.

We may expand our fleet beyond our contracted newbuildings by ordering additional

newbuildings or by making selective acquisitions of high-quality secondhand ships to the extent that
they are available in the same way that we acquired the GasLog Chelsea and will acquire the three
ships under the Pending Vessel Acquisition. Our future growth will depend on numerous factors,
some of which are beyond our control, including our ability to:

• identify attractive ship acquisition opportunities and consummate such acquisitions;
• obtain newbuilding contracts at acceptable prices;
• obtain required financing on acceptable terms;
• secure charter arrangements on terms acceptable to our lenders;

19

• expand our relationships with existing customers and establish new customer relationships;
• recruit and retain additional suitably qualified and experienced seafarers and shore-based

employees;

• continue to meet technical and safety performance standards;
• manage joint ventures; and
• manage the expansion of our operations to integrate the new ships into our fleet.
During periods in which charter rates are high, ship values are generally high as well, and it
may be difficult to consummate ship acquisitions or enter into shipbuilding contracts at favorable
prices. In addition, any ship acquisition we complete may not be profitable at or after the time of
acquisition and may not generate cash flows sufficient to justify the investment. We may not be
successful in executing any future growth plans, and we cannot give any assurances that we will not
incur significant expenses and losses in connection with such growth efforts.

Our credit facilities are secured by our ships and contain payment obligations and restrictive
covenants that may restrict our business and financing activities as well as our ability to pay
dividends. A failure by us to meet our obligations under our credit facilities could result in an
event of default under such credit facilities and foreclosure on our ships.

Our credit facilities impose, and any future credit facility we enter into will impose, operating

and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions in our credit facilities generally limit our
shipowning subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:

• incur additional indebtedness, create liens or provide guarantees;
• provide any form of credit or financial assistance to, or enter into any non-arms’ length

transactions with, us or any of our affiliates;

• sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including our ships;
• engage in merger transactions;
• enter into, terminate or amend any charter;
• amend our shipbuilding contracts;
• change the manager of our ships;
• undergo a change in ownership; or
• acquire assets, make investments or enter into any joint venture agreements outside the

ordinary course of business.

Our credit facilities also impose certain restrictions relating to us and our other subsidiaries,

including restrictions that limit our ability to make any substantial change in the nature of our
business or to engage in transactions that would constitute a change of control, as defined in the
relevant credit facility, without repaying all of our indebtedness in full, or to allow our largest
shareholders to reduce their shareholding in us below specified thresholds.

Our credit facilities also impose specified financial covenants that apply to us and our

subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. These financial covenants include the following:

• our net working capital (excluding the current portion of long-term debt) must be positive;
• our total indebtedness divided by our total capitalization must not exceed 75%;
• beginning December 31, 2013, the ratio of EBITDA over our debt service obligations

(including interest and debt repayments) on a trailing 12 months’ basis must be no less than
110%;

• beginning December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of all unencumbered cash and cash

equivalents must exceed the higher of 3% of our total indebtedness or $20 million after the
first drawdown;

20

• we are permitted to pay dividends, provided that we hold unencumbered cash equal to at
least 4% of our total indebtedness, subject to no event of default having occurred or
occurring as a consequence of the payment of such dividends; and

• our market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $350 million.
In addition, all of our credit facilities contain covenants requiring that the fair market value of
our ships remain above 120% of all amounts outstanding under the applicable facility. In the event
that the value of a ship falls below the threshold, we could be required to provide the lender with
additional security or prepay a portion of the outstanding loan balance, which could negatively
impact our liquidity. If we are unable to provide such additional security or prepayment, we may be
in breach of covenants under the facility.

Further, the NOK denominated bond agreement signed on June 27, 2013, or the “Bond
Agreement”, for our NOK 500 million bond includes a dividend restriction according to which we
may not (i) declare or make any dividend payment or distribution, whether in cash or in kind, (ii)
repurchase any of our shares or undertake other similar transactions (including, but not limited to,
total return swaps related to our shares), or (iii) grant any loans or make other distributions or
transactions constituting a transfer of value to our shareholders (items (i), (ii) and (iii) collectively
referred to as the “Distributions”) that in aggregate exceed during any calendar year 50% of our
consolidated net profit after taxes based on the audited annual accounts for the previous financial
year (any unutilized portion of the permitted dividend pursuant to the above may not be carried
forward). Notwithstanding the above, for the years 2013 and 2014, we may make Distributions up to
a maximum of $0.60 per share per annum subject to us, immediately after such distributions,
maintaining consolidated Free Liquidity (as defined in the Bond Agreement) of not less than (i)
$20,000,000 and (ii) 4% of Total Indebtedness (as defined in the Bond Agreement). Any net profit
of a Group company related to sale of assets shall in any event not form a basis for any
Distributions.

The loan agreement we entered into in March 2012 for a $272.5 million credit facility provides

that the lenders thereunder will have an option that gives them the right to request repayment of
the facility in full on the fifth anniversary of the delivery of the GasLog Shanghai, which was
delivered in January 2013. If the lenders exercise this option, we may not have, or be able to obtain,
sufficient funds to meet our payment obligations under the facility.

Certain of our credit facilities also contain vessel employment conditions, pursuant to which we
could be required in the event of a charter termination to deposit cash in an account held with the
applicable lender until we have obtained a new time charter on terms acceptable to such lender. In
addition, we are required under one of our facilities to secure charters for the ships identified by
hull numbers 2043 and 2044, on terms approved by the lenders, at least 60 days prior to the
scheduled delivery date of the applicable ship.

Our ability to comply with covenants and restrictions contained in our financing arrangements

may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry
conditions. A failure to comply with covenants and restrictions or to meet our payment and other
obligations could lead to defaults under our credit facilities which could cause our payment
obligations to be accelerated. We may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these
accelerated payments. Because obligations under our financing arrangements are secured by our
ships and are guaranteed by our ship-owning subsidiaries, if we are unable to repay debt under our
financing arrangements, the lenders could seek to foreclose on those assets, which would materially
and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, including
cash available for dividends to our shareholders. In addition, a default under one of our credit
facilities could result in the cross-acceleration of our other indebtedness. For more information
regarding our credit facilities, please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities”.

21

Ship values may fluctuate substantially, which could impact our compliance with the covenants in
our loan agreements and, if the values are lower at a time when we are attempting to dispose of
ships, could cause us to incur a loss.

Values for ships can fluctuate substantially over time due to a number of different factors,

including:

• prevailing economic conditions in the natural gas and energy markets;
• a substantial or extended decline in demand for LNG;
• the level of worldwide LNG production and exports;
• changes in the supply-demand balance of the global LNG carrier fleet;
• changes in prevailing charter hire rates;
• the physical condition of the ship;
• the size, age and technical specifications of the ship;
• demand for LNG carriers; and
• the cost of retrofitting or modifying existing ships, as a result of technological advances in
ship design or equipment, changes in applicable environmental or other regulations or
standards, customer requirements or otherwise.

If the market value of our ships declines, we may breach some of the covenants contained in

our credit facilities. If we do breach such covenants and we are unable to remedy the relevant
breach, our lenders could accelerate our indebtedness and seek to foreclose on the ships in our fleet
securing those credit facilities. In addition, if a charter contract expires or is terminated by the
customer, we may be unable to re-deploy the affected ships at attractive rates and, rather than
continue to incur costs to maintain and finance them, we may seek to dispose of them. Any
foreclosure on our ships, or any disposal by us of a ship at a time when ship prices have fallen,
could result in a loss and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Our debt levels may limit our flexibility to obtain additional financing and pursue other business
opportunities.

As of December 31, 2013, we had an aggregate of $1.06 billion of indebtedness outstanding

under six credit agreements, of which $104.75 million is repayable within one year which includes
$39.49 million under the revolving credit facility, and we had $82.23 million outstanding under the
Bond which amount is payable in June 2018. As of December 31, 2013 there is an undrawn amount
of $10.51 million from the revolving facility of GAS-two Ltd. from which $2.68 million was drawn in
January 2014 and the balance is available to be drawn under certain conditions. In addition, there is
one loan facility with an aggregate undrawn amount of $435 million available that will be used to
finance a portion of the contract prices of three of our newbuildings on their deliveries. We may
incur additional indebtedness in the future as we grow our fleet. This level of debt could have
important consequences to us, including the following:

• our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital

expenditures, ship acquisitions or other purposes may be impaired or such financing may not
be available on favorable terms;

• our costs of borrowing could increase as we become more leveraged;
• we will need a substantial portion of our cash flow to make principal and interest payments
on our debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be available for operations, future
business opportunities and dividends to our shareholders;

• our debt level may make us more vulnerable than our competitors with less debt to
competitive pressures or a downturn in our industry or the economy generally; and

• our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to changing business and economic

conditions.

22

Our ability to service our debt depends upon, among other things, our future financial and
operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial,
business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating
results are not sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take
actions such as reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital
expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our debt or seeking additional equity capital
or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory terms,
or at all.

Our ability to obtain additional debt financing for future acquisitions of ships or to refinance our
existing debt may depend on the creditworthiness of our charterers and the terms of our future
charters.

Our ability to borrow against the ships in our existing fleet and any ships we may acquire in the
future largely depends on the value of the ships, which in turn depends in part on charter hire rates
and the ability of our charterers to comply with the terms of their charters. The actual or perceived
credit quality of our charterers, and any defaults by them, may materially affect our ability to obtain
the additional capital resources that we will require to purchase additional ships and to refinance our
existing debt as balloon payments come due, or may significantly increase our costs of obtaining
such capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing or committing to financing on unattractive
terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Our ability to pay dividends may be limited by the amount of cash we generate from operations, by
restrictions in our credit facilities and by additional factors unrelated to our profitability.

We intend to pay regular quarterly dividends. The declaration and payment of any dividend is

subject to the discretion of our board of directors and the requirements of Bermuda law. The timing
and amount of any dividend payments will be dependent on our earnings, financial condition, cash
requirements and availability, restrictions in our debt agreements, the provisions of Bermuda law
and other factors. The amount of cash we generate from operations and the actual amount of cash
we will have available for dividends will vary based upon, among other things:

• our earnings, financial condition and cash requirements;
• restrictions in our credit facilities, Bond Agreement and other financing agreements;
• the provisions of Bermuda law affecting the payment of dividends to shareholders;
• the charter hire payments we obtain from our charters as well as the rates obtained from

future charters;

• our fleet expansion and associated uses of our cash as well as any financing requirements;
• delays in the delivery of newbuildings and the commencement of payments under charters

relating to those ships;

• the level of our operating costs, such as the costs of crews and insurance, as well as the costs

of repairs, maintenance or modifications of our ships;

• the number of unscheduled off-hire days for our fleet as well as the timing of, and number of

days required for, scheduled drydocking of our ships;

• prevailing global and regional economic or political conditions;
• changes in interest rates;
• the effect of governmental regulations and maritime self-regulatory organization standards on

the conduct of our business;

• changes in the basis of taxation of our activities in various jurisdictions;
• modification or revocation of our dividend policy by our board of directors; and
• the amount of any cash reserves established by our board of directors.

23

The amount of cash we generate from our operations may differ materially from our profit or

loss for the period, which will be affected by non-cash items. We may incur other expenses or
liabilities that could reduce or eliminate the cash available for dividends.

Under Bermuda law, a company may not declare or pay dividends if there are reasonable
grounds for believing that: (i) the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its
liabilities as they become due; or (ii) the realizable value of the company’s assets would thereby be
less than its liabilities. Under our bye-laws, each common share is entitled to dividends as and when
any such dividends are declared by our board of directors.

As a result of these and the other factors mentioned above, we may pay dividends during
periods when we record losses and may not pay dividends during periods when we record a profit.
We can give no assurance that dividends will be paid in the future.

We are a holding company and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to
us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments.

We are a holding company. Our subsidiaries conduct substantially all of our operations and own

all of our operating assets, including our ships. We have no significant assets other than the equity
interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to pay our obligations and to make dividend
payments depends entirely on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. The ability
of a subsidiary to make these distributions could be affected by a claim or other action by a third
party, including a creditor, or by the law of its jurisdiction of incorporation which regulates the
payment of dividends. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, our board of directors
may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends.

Fluctuations in exchange rates and interest rates could result in financial losses for us.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates and interest rates may have an impact on our financial

performance. We receive virtually all of our revenues in dollars, while some of our operating
expenses, including employee costs and certain crew costs, are denominated in euros. As a result, we
are exposed to a foreign exchange risk. However, we also maintain cash balances in euros, which
amounted to approximately $8.66 million as of December 31, 2013. Although we monitor exchange
rate fluctuations on a continuous basis, we do not currently hedge movements in currency exchange
rates. As a result, there is a risk that currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on our cash
flows and results of operations.

In addition, we are exposed to a market risk relating to fluctuations in interest rates because
our credit facilities bear interest costs at a floating rate based on London Interbank Offered Rate,
or LIBOR. Significant increases in LIBOR rates could adversely affect our cash flows, results of
operations and ability to service our debt. Although we use interest rate swaps from time to time to
reduce our exposure to interest rate risk, we hedge only a portion of our outstanding indebtedness.
There is no assurance that our derivative contracts will provide adequate protection against adverse
changes in interest rates or that our bank counterparties will be able to perform their obligations.

The derivative contracts used to hedge our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates could result in
reductions in our shareholders’ equity as well as charges against our profit.

We enter into interest rate swaps from time to time for purposes of managing our exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates applicable to floating rate indebtedness. As of December 31, 2013, we
had 18 interest rate swaps in place with a notional amount of $937.61 million. For the 6 interest rate
swaps that have been designated as cash flow hedging instruments, the changes in the fair value of
the contracts are recognized in our statement of other comprehensive income as cash flow hedge
gains or losses for the period, and could affect compliance with the market value adjusted net worth
covenants in our credit facilities. In addition, the changes in the fair value of the 12 derivative
contracts that have not been designated as cash flow hedging instruments are recognized in our
statement of profit or loss. Changes in the fair value of any derivative contracts that do not qualify
for treatment as cash flow hedges for financial reporting purposes would affect, among other things,

24

our profit, earnings per share and affect compliance with the market value adjusted net worth
covenants in our credit facilities.

In June 2013, we entered into three Cross Currency Swaps, or “CCSs”, to exchange interest

payments and principal on maturity on the same terms as the Bond Agreement, in order to hedge
the variability of the functional currency equivalent cash flows on the bond. As of December 31,
2013, the three CCSs had a notional amount of $83.21 million and qualified as cash flow hedging
instruments for accounting purposes. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of CCSs is
recognized in other comprehensive income while the ineffective portion impacts the statement of
profit or loss for the period.

There is no assurance that our derivative contracts will provide adequate protection against

adverse changes in interest rates or that our bank counterparties will be able to perform their
obligations. In addition, as a result of the implementation of new regulation of the swaps markets in
the United States, the European Union and elsewhere over the next few years, the cost and
availability of interest rate and currency hedges may increase or suitable hedges may not be
available.

Our earnings and business are subject to the credit risk associated with our contractual
counterparties.

We enter into, among other things, time charters, ship management agreements and other
contracts with our customers, shipbuilding contracts and refund guarantees relating to newbuildings,
credit facilities and commitment letters with banks, insurance contracts and interest rate swaps. Such
agreements subject us to counterparty credit risk. The ability and willingness of each of our
counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us will depend upon a number of
factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic
conditions, the condition of the natural gas and LNG markets and charter hire rates. Should a
counterparty fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, we could sustain significant
losses which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders.

Our business depends on certain of our senior executives who may not necessarily continue to work
for us.

Our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and the efforts of our Chairman,

Peter G. Livanos, and certain of our senior executives. Mr. Livanos has substantial experience in the
shipping industry and has worked with us for many years. He and certain of our senior executives
are important to the execution of our business strategies and to the growth and development of our
business. If Mr. Livanos or one or more of our senior executives ceased to be affiliated with us, we
may be unable to recruit other employees with equivalent talent and experience, and our business
and financial condition could suffer.

We are a partial owner of Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. The dividends we receive on account of our
ownership interest may decline in the future and we may have to write down the value of our
investment.

We currently own a 25% stake in Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd., or “Egypt LNG”, an entity whose
principal asset is the LNG carrier Methane Nile Eagle, which is currently operating under a 20-year
time charter with a subsidiary of BG Group. The declaration and payment of dividends by Egypt
LNG is subject to the discretion of its board of directors, which we do not control, as well as other
restrictions, including a minimum cash reserve requirement. As a result, the dividends we receive on
account of our ownership interest may decline in the future, which would adversely impact our cash
flows, including cash available for dividends to our shareholders. In the event of an adverse change
in the operating results of Egypt LNG resulting from, among other things, unscheduled off-hire days,
damage to or loss of the Methane Nile Eagle or early termination of the ship’s charter, we would
expect the amount of dividends we receive to be reduced or eliminated, and we may be required to

25

record an impairment of our investment. The loss may limit our ability to borrow against our assets
for future credit and could also adversely affect our share price. In addition, we have entered into a
shareholders’ agreement with the other shareholders of Egypt LNG that imposes restrictions,
including preemption rights, on each party’s ability to transfer, grant any security interest over or
otherwise dispose of its ownership interest.

Because the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is not currently permitted to inspect our
independent accounting firm, you may not benefit from such inspections.

Auditors of U.S. public companies are required by law to undergo periodic Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board or “PCAOB” inspections that assess their compliance with U.S. law
and professional standards in connection with performance of audits of financial statements filed
with the SEC. Certain European Union countries, including Greece, do not currently permit the
PCAOB to conduct inspections of accounting firms established and operating in such European
Union countries, even if they are part of major international firms. The PCAOB conducted
inspections in Greece in 2008 and evaluated our auditor’s performance of audits of SEC registrants
and our auditor’s quality controls. Currently, however, the PCAOB is unable to conduct inspections
in Greece until a cooperation agreement between the PCAOB and the Greek Accounting &
Auditing Standards Oversight Board is reached. Accordingly, unlike for most U.S. public companies,
should the PCAOB again wish to conduct an inspection it is currently prevented from evaluating our
auditor’s performance of audits and its quality control procedures, and, unlike shareholders of most
U.S. public companies, our shareholders would be deprived of the possible benefits of such
inspections.

The formation of a master limited partnership, or “MLP”, for purposes of the proposed MLP
initial public offering may involve issuance of interests to third parties representing a substantial
portion of our assets.

In February 2014, we made a confidential submission to the SEC of a draft registration

statement on Form F-1 for an initial public offering of units in a MLP to be formed to own certain
of our LNG carriers with multi-year charter contracts. If we complete the proposed MLP initial
public offering, we would contribute certain of our ships or ship-owning subsidiaries to a master
limited partnership on terms with which you may not agree or may believe are not in the best
interests of the holders of our common shares. The master limited partnership would issue equity
securities to public or private investors and apply the substantial part of the proceeds to reduce ship-
related indebtedness. While any such transaction would reduce our overall indebtedness, it would
also reduce our indirect percentage interest in the transferred ships (and ship-owning subsidiaries)
and our rights to cash flows related to the transferred ships. There is no assurance that the proposed
MLP initial public offering will be consummated. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B.
Business Overview—Our Fleet”.

Risks Related to Our Common Shares

The price of our common shares may be volatile.

The price of our common shares may be volatile and may fluctuate due to factors including:
• actual or anticipated fluctuations in quarterly and annual results;
• fluctuations in the seaborne transportation industry, including fluctuations in the LNG carrier

market;

• mergers and strategic alliances in the shipping industry;
• changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organizations standards;
• shortfalls in our operating results from levels forecasted by securities analysts;
• our payment of dividends;
• announcements concerning us or our competitors;

26

• the failure of securities analysts to publish research about us, or analysts making changes in

their financial estimates;
• general economic conditions;
• terrorist acts;
• future sales of our shares or other securities;
• investors’ perceptions of us and the LNG shipping industry;
• the general state of the securities markets; and
• other developments affecting us, our industry or our competitors.
Securities markets worldwide are experiencing significant price and volume fluctuations. The
market price for our common shares may also be volatile. This market volatility, as well as general
economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common shares
despite our operating performance.

Increases in interest rates may cause the market price of our common shares to decline.

An increase in interest rates may cause a corresponding decline in demand for equity

investments in general. Any such increase in interest rates or reduction in demand for our common
shares resulting from other relatively more attractive investment opportunities may cause the trading
price of our common shares to decline.

We are a “foreign private issuer” under the NYSE rules, and as such we are entitled to exemption
from certain NYSE corporate governance standards, and you may not have the same protections
afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance
requirements.

We are a “foreign private issuer” under the securities laws of the United States and the rules of

the NYSE. Under the securities laws of the United States, “foreign private issuers” are subject to
different disclosure requirements than U.S. domiciled registrants, as well as different financial
reporting requirements. Under the NYSE rules, a “foreign private issuer” is subject to less stringent
corporate governance requirements. Subject to certain exceptions, the rules of the NYSE permit a
“foreign private issuer” to follow its home country practice in lieu of the listing requirements of the
NYSE, including (i) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent
directors, (ii) the requirement that the nominating/corporate governance committee be composed
entirely of independent directors and have a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and
responsibilities, (iii) the requirement that the compensation committee be composed entirely of
independent directors and have a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and
responsibilities and (iv) the requirement of an annual performance evaluation of the
nominating/corporate governance and compensation committees.

As permitted by these exemptions, as well as by our bye-laws and the laws of Bermuda, we

have one or more non-independent directors serving as committee members on our compensation
committee and our corporate governance and nominating committee. As a result, non-independent
directors may, among other things, participate in fixing the compensation of our management,
making share and option awards and resolving governance issues regarding our Company.

Accordingly, in the future you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of

companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure
requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common shares less attractive
to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company”, as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take
advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other
public companies that are not “emerging growth companies”. We have elected to opt out of the

27

extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under Section
107(b) of the JOBS Act, which election is irrevocable. We cannot predict if investors will find our
common shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our
common shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common
shares and our unit price may be more volatile. In addition, under the JOBS Act, our independent
registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for so long as we
are an emerging growth company. For as long as we take advantage of the reduced reporting
obligations, the information that we provide to shareholders may be different than information
provided by other public companies.

Future sales of our equity securities could cause the market price of our common shares to decline.

Sales of a substantial number of our common shares in the public market, or the perception
that these sales could occur, may depress the market price for our common shares. These sales could
also impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our equity securities in the
future.

In the future we may issue additional equity securities which may be pari passu with or senior
to our common shares. The issuance by us of additional common shares or other equity securities
that are contractually or structurally pari passu with or senior to our common shares would have the
following effects:

• our shareholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us will decrease;
• the dividend amount payable per share on our common shares may be lower;
• the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding common share may be diminished;

and

• the market price of our common shares may decline.
Our shareholders also may elect to sell large numbers of shares held by them from time to
time. The number of our common shares available for sale in the public market will be limited by
restrictions applicable under securities laws.

Entities controlled by members of the Livanos families are our principal shareholders and will
control the outcome of most matters on which our shareholders are entitled to vote; their interests
may be different from yours.

Entities controlled by members of the Livanos family, including our Chairman, may be deemed
to beneficially own approximately 41.5% of our issued and outstanding common shares. As a result
of shareholding, Mr. Livanos can effectively control the outcome of most matters on which our
shareholders are entitled to vote, including the election of our entire board of directors and other
significant corporate actions. The interests of these shareholders may be different from yours.

Provisions in our organizational documents may have anti-takeover effects.

Our bye-laws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us

without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions require an affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes attaching to all issued and outstanding shares to approve any merger,
consolidation, amalgamation or similar transactions. Our bye-laws also provide for restrictions on the
time period in which directors may be nominated.

These provisions could make it difficult for our shareholders to replace or remove our current

board of directors or could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing an offer by a
third party to acquire us, even if the third party’s offer may be considered beneficial by many
shareholders. As a result, shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their
shares.

28

Tax Risks

In addition to the following risk factors, you should read “Item 10. Additional Information—E.

Tax Considerations” for a more complete discussion of the material Bermuda and U.S. Federal
income tax consequences of owning and disposing of our common shares.

We will have to pay tax on U.S.-source income, which would reduce our earnings.

Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code”, the U.S.
source gross transportation income of a ship-owning or chartering corporation, such as ourselves, is
subject to a 4% U.S. Federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation
qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder. U.S. source gross transportation income consists of 50% of the gross
shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both
begin and end, in the United States.

We do not currently qualify for this statutory tax exemption, and therefore we are subject to

the 4% U.S. Federal income tax described above. We do not expect any resulting U.S. tax liability
to be material or materially reduce the earnings available for distribution to our shareholders for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014. Changes to our business could change
this expectation and in such circumstances we may attempt to qualify for the exemption from tax
under Section 883. For a more detailed discussion, see the section entitled “Item 10. Additional
Information—E. Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—U.S.
Taxation of Our Operating Income”.

If we were treated as a “passive foreign investment company”, certain adverse U.S. Federal income
tax consequences could result to U.S. shareholders.

A foreign corporation will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company”, or “PFIC”, for
U.S. Federal income tax purposes if at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of
certain types of “passive income”, or at least 50% of the average value of the corporation’s assets
produce or are held for the production of those types of “passive income”. For purposes of these
tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment
property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties that are received from unrelated
parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests,
income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income”. U.S.
shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. Federal income tax regime with
respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFIC and the
gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC. If we are
treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, we will provide information to U.S. shareholders who
request such information to enable them to make certain elections to alleviate certain of the adverse
U.S. Federal income tax consequences that would arise as a result of holding an interest in a PFIC.

Based on our method of operation, we do not believe that we are a PFIC for this taxable year.
In this regard, we intend to treat the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time
chartering activities as services income, rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe that our
income from our time chartering activities does not constitute “passive income”, and the assets that
we own and operate in connection with the production of that income do not constitute passive
assets.

There is, however, no legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our proposed method of
operation. Accordingly, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the “IRS”, or a court of law may not
accept our position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a
PFIC. Moreover, we could constitute a PFIC for a future taxable year if there were to be changes in
the nature and extent of our operations.

If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, U.S.

shareholders would face adverse tax consequences. Under the PFIC rules, unless those shareholders
make certain elections available under the Code, such shareholders would be liable to pay U.S.

29

Federal income tax at the then prevailing income tax rates on ordinary income plus interest upon
excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of our common shares, as if the excess
distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the shareholder’s holding period. Please read
“Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations—Taxation of United States Holders—PFIC Status and Significant Tax Consequences”
for a more detailed discussion of the U.S. Federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders if
we are treated as a PFIC.

The enactment of proposed legislation could affect whether dividends paid by us constitute qualified
dividend income eligible for the preferential rate.

Legislation has been proposed in the United States Senate that would deny the preferential rate
of U.S. Federal income tax currently imposed on qualified dividend income with respect to dividends
received from a non-U.S. corporation, unless the non-U.S. corporation either is eligible for benefits
of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States or is created or organized under the
laws of a foreign country which has a comprehensive income tax system. Because Bermuda has not
entered into a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States and imposes only limited
taxes on corporations organized under its laws, it is unlikely that we could satisfy either of these
requirements. Consequently, if this legislation were enacted in its current form the preferential rate
of U.S. Federal income tax discussed under the heading “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Tax
Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation of United States
Holders—Distributions on Our Common Shares” may no longer be applicable to dividends received
from us. It is not possible to predict with certainty whether or in what form the proposed legislation
will be enacted.

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and Development of the Company

GasLog Ltd. was incorporated in Bermuda on July 16, 2003. GasLog Ltd. and its subsidiaries
are primarily engaged in the ownership, operation and management of vessels in the LNG market,
providing maritime services for the transportation of LNG on a worldwide basis and LNG vessel
management services. The Group conducts its operations through its vessel-owning subsidiaries and
through its vessel management services subsidiary.

Our company and its founders have a long history in shipping and in LNG carriers. Our largest

shareholder is Ceres Shipping Ltd. or “Ceres Shipping”, whose founding family’s shipping activities
commenced more than 100 years ago and who is currently controlled by our Chairman, Peter G.
Livanos. The late Mr. George P. Livanos, father of our current Chairman, established the
predecessor to Ceres Shipping. Ceres Shipping also has interests in tankers, dry bulk carriers and
containerships. Ceres Shipping entered the LNG sector in 2001 by undertaking the management of
BG Group’s owned fleet of LNG carriers through our subsidiary GasLog LNG Services, and in 2003
GasLog Ltd. was incorporated. Until 2010, when we took delivery of the GasLog Savannah and the
GasLog Singapore, our business principally consisted of providing technical ship management
services, as well as plan approval and construction supervision services for newbuilding LNG
carriers. As a result, we have had a longer presence in LNG shipping than many other independent
owners currently operating in the sector. Our members of senior management have an average of 27
years of shipping expertise. For a description of our historical and current capital expenditures, see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—
Capital Expenditures”.

On April 4, 2012, we completed our initial public offering, or “IPO”, and our common shares

began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on March 30, 2012 under the ticker symbol
“GLOG”. On January 22, 2014, we completed a follow-on public offering and concurrent private
placement of our common shares. We maintain our principal executive offices at Gildo Pastor
Center, 7 Rue du Gabian, MC 98000, Monaco. Our telephone number at that address is +377 97 97
51 15. We are registered with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda under registration number

30

33928. We maintain a registered office in Bermuda at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton,
HM 11, Bermuda. There have been no public takeover offers by third parties for our shares nor any
public takeover offers by us for the shares of another company which have occurred during the last
and current financial years.

B. Business Overview

Overview

We are a growth-oriented international owner, operator and manager of LNG carriers providing
support to international energy companies as part of their LNG logistics chain. After giving effect to
the Pending Vessel Acquisition, our owned fleet will consist of 18 wholly-owned LNG carriers,
including 11 ships on the water (two ships delivered in 2010, five ships delivered in 2013, one on-
the-water ship acquired in 2013, and the three ships being acquired pursuant to the Pending Vessel
Acquisition), and seven LNG carriers on order at one of the world’s leading LNG shipbuilder,
Samsung Heavy Industries. After giving effect to the Pending Vessel Acquisition, we will manage
and operate 20 LNG carriers, which include our 11 owned ships on the water, 8 ships owned or
leased by BG Group, a leading participant in the global energy and natural gas markets, and one
additional LNG carrier in which we have a 25% interest. We are also supervising the construction of
our newbuildings. After giving effect to the Pending Vessel Acquisition, 15 of our 18 owned ships
including all our newbuildings are, or when delivered will be, high-specification LNG carriers
equipped with modern tri-fuel diesel electric propulsion technology, or “TFDE”. We have multi-year
time charter contracts for seven of the eight ships that have been delivered, five of our newbuildings
on order and the three ships to be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition. From December
31, 2013, these contracts are expected to provide total contracted revenue of $2.5 billion during their
initial terms, which expire between 2015 and 2026.

In addition to our committed order book, we have options to purchase six additional LNG
carriers from Samsung Heavy Industries that expire at the end of the first quarter of 2014. We also
have a 25% interest in an additional ship, the Methane Nile Eagle, a 2007-built LNG carrier
technically managed by us that is currently operating under a 20-year time charter to a subsidiary of
BG Group.

The total contract price for our seven newbuildings on order as of March 26, 2014, was

approximately $1.39 billion, of which $129.14 million was paid as of March 26, 2014. The balance is
payable under each shipbuilding contract in installments upon the attainment of certain specified
milestones, with the largest portion of the purchase price for each ship coming due upon its delivery.
We have entered into one loan agreement with an aggregate undrawn amount of $435 million as of
March 26, 2014 to finance a portion of the contract prices of three of our newbuildings on order. In
January 2014, in connection with the Pending Vessel Acquisition, we obtained a commitment from
Citibank, N.A., London Branch, or Citibank, for $325.5 million of debt financing with a two year
maturity. The aggregate cost of the ships under the Pending Vessel Acquisition is $468 million,
which will be financed by borrowings under the Citibank facility as well as proceeds from our
January 2014 public offering and concurrent private placement.

Our current time charters have initial terms of up to 10 years and include options that permit

the charterers to extend the terms for successive periods under hire rate provisions that are
comparable to those prevailing at the end of the expiring term. We will continue to evaluate the
attractiveness of longer and shorter term chartering opportunities as the commercial characteristics
of the LNG carrier industry evolve. We have structured our order book of new LNG carriers to
have staggered delivery dates, facilitating a smooth integration of the ships into our fleet as well as
significant annual growth through 2016. This has the additional advantage of spreading our exposure
to the re-employment of these ships over several years upon expiration of their current charters.

Each of our 18 owned LNG carriers is designed with a capacity of between approximately
145,000 cbm and 174,000 cbm. We believe this size range maximizes their operational flexibility, as
these ships are compatible with most existing LNG terminals around the world. All but one of the
LNG carriers in our owned fleet will be sister ships (in groups of ten, four and three ships), which

31

allows us to benefit from economies of scale and operating efficiencies in ship construction, crew
training, crew rotation and shared spare parts. Upon delivery of the last of our seven contracted
newbuildings in 2016 and after giving effect to the Pending Vessel Acquisition, our owned fleet will
have an average age of 4 years, making it one of the youngest in the industry. By comparison, as of
March 1, 2014, the average age for the global fleet including LNG carriers of all sizes is 10.8 years,
according to Clarkson Research.

Our wholly owned subsidiary, GasLog LNG Services, exclusively handles the technical

management of our fleet, including plan approval for new ship orders, supervision of ship
construction and planning and supervision of drydockings, as well as technical operations, crewing,
training, maintenance, regulatory and classification compliance and health, safety, security and
environmental, or “HSSE”, management and reporting. As the sole technical manager of BG
Group’s owned fleet of LNG carriers for over 12 years, we have established a track record for the
efficient, safe and reliable operation of LNG carriers, which is evidenced by our safety performance
and the limited off-hire days of the 20 ships currently operating under our management.

With the global demand for natural gas increasing and LNG’s share of the international natural

gas trade expanding within the sector, we strongly believe that this is a favorable time to grow an
LNG vessel owner through the addition of modern vessels. The LNG shipping business is
characterized by significant barriers to entry, as it requires a large amount of capital, qualified ship
personnel, a high degree of technical management capabilities and deep and long-standing
relationships with customers and suppliers. We believe we are well positioned to access additional
growth opportunities, based on our experience, our high standards for quality, our strong track
record in LNG safety and technical management and our long-standing relationships with leading
LNG charterers, shipbuilders, shipbrokers and lenders.

Our Fleet

Owned Fleet

The following table presents information about our fleet as of March 26, 2014:

Vessel Name

Year
Built

Year of
Delivery

1 GasLog Savannah . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 GasLog Singapore . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 GasLog Chelsea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 GasLog Shanghai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 GasLog Santiago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6 GasLog Sydney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 GasLog Skagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 GasLog Seattle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9 Pending Vessel 1*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10 Pending Vessel 2*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11 Pending Vessel 3*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2010
2010
2010
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2006/7
2006/7
2006/7

2010
2010
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2014
2014
2014

Cargo
Capacity
(cbm)

155,000
155,000
153,600
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
145,000
145,000
145,000

Propulsion

Charterer

TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
Steam
Steam
Steam

BG Group
BG Group
Spot Market
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
Shell
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group

Charter
Expiration
2015(1)
2016(1)
n/a
2018(1)
2018(1)
2019(1)
2021(2)
2020(1)
2020(3)
2020(3)
2020(3)

* Denotes ships to be acquired from BG Group pursuant to the Pending Vessel Acquisition. Currently, these ships are

managed by the Company. Under the Pending Vessel Acquisition, BG Group will nominate three ships out of a group of
six specified ships, all of which we currently manage for BG Group. See “—Recent Developments—Pending Vessel
Acquisitions”.

(1) Indicates the expiration of the initial term. The charterers have unilateral options to extend the term of the time charters
for periods ranging from 30 months to 10 years, depending on the charter and whether all extension options under the
charter are exercised.

(2) Time charter provides for full employment for three years and a subsequent five year seasonal charter under which the

ship is employed for seven months and available to accept other charters for five months.

(3) Indicates the expiration of the initial term. The charterer will have unilateral options to extend the term of the time

charters for two of the pending vessels for a period of either three or five years at its election.

32

Pending Vessel Acquisition

On January 15, 2014 we announced an agreement with Methane Services Limited, an affiliate of

BG Group, to purchase three 145,000 cbm steam-powered LNG carriers, and to charter those ships
back to BG Group for six-year initial terms. BG Group will have unilateral options to extend the
term of the time charters for two of the ships for a period of either three or five years. The ships to
be acquired will be nominated by BG Group from an agreed group of six sister ships built in 2006
and 2007. We supervised the construction of all six ships for BG Group and have provided technical
management for the ships since delivery. The aggregate cost to GasLog for the ships is expected to
be approximately $468 million. We estimate that upon their acquisition, these ships will generate
approximately $426.3 million of incremental contracted revenue over their initial charter terms. In
connection with the Pending Vessel Acquisition, GasLog obtained a commitment from Citibank for
$325.5 million of debt financing with a two year maturity. We expect to use borrowings under the
Citibank facility as well as proceeds from our January 2014 public offering and concurrent private
placement to fund the purchase price for the Pending Vessel Acquisition. The closing of the
transaction is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the completion of definitive
documentation and necessary financing. We expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of
2014.

Proposed Master Limited Partnership Offering

In February 2014, we made a confidential submission to the SEC of a draft registration

statement on Form F-1 for an initial public offering of units in a MLP to be formed to own certain
of our LNG carriers with multi-year charter contracts. The proceeds of the proposed MLP initial
public offering would principally be used to reduce indebtedness. Completion of the proposed MLP
initial public offering is subject to further board authorization as well as completion of the SEC
review process.

Vessel Name

Newbuilds

Scheduled
Delivery(1)

1 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2042 . . . . . . . . Q2 2014
2 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2043 . . . . . . . . Q4 2014
3 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2044 . . . . . . . . Q1 2015
4 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2072 . . . . . . . . Q1 2016
5 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2073 . . . . . . . . Q2 2016
6 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2102 . . . . . . . . Q3 2016
7 GasLog Newbuilding—SHI #2103 . . . . . . . . Q4 2016

Cargo
Capacity
(cbm)

155,000
155,000
155,000
174,000
174,000
174,000
174,000

Propulsion

Charterer

TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE

Shell
n/a
n/a
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group

Charter
Expiration
2021(2)
n/a
n/a
2026(2)
2026(2)
2023(2)
2023(2)

(1) Expected delivery quarters are presented.

(2) Indicates the expiration of the initial term. The charterers have unilateral options to extend the term of the time charters
for periods ranging from 30 months to 10 years, depending on the charter and whether all extension options under the
charter are exercised.

The Company also currently holds six options to purchase 174,000 cbm newbuildings from
Samsung, each of which would be built against a very high specification. They all have scheduled
delivery dates within 2017. Four of those options are at fixed prices and two are at prices to be
mutually agreed. Currently, all six options will expire at the end of the first quarter, 2014.

The key characteristics of our owned fleet include the following:
• each ship is sized at between approximately 145,000 cbm and 174,000 cbm capacity, which

places our ships in the medium- to large-size class of LNG carriers; we believe this size range
maximizes their operational flexibility, as these ships are compatible with most existing LNG
terminals around the world, and minimizes excess LNG boil-off;

• all but one of our ships, including the newbuilds, are sister ships (in groups of ten, four and

three ships);

33

• each ship is double-hulled, which is standard in the LNG industry;
• each ship has a membrane containment system incorporating current industry construction

standards, including guidelines and recommendations from Gaztransport and Technigaz (the
designer of the membrane system) as well as updated standards from our classification society;

• each of our ships is modern steam powered or tri-fuel diesel electric propulsion technology;
• Bermuda is the flag state of each ship;
• each of our delivered ships has received, and each of our newbuildings is expected to receive,

an ENVIRO+ notation from our classification society, which denotes compliance with its
published guidelines concerning the most stringent criteria for environmental protection
related to design characteristics, management and support systems, sea discharges and air
emissions; and

• upon delivery of the last of our seven contracted newbuildings in 2016, our owned fleet will

have an average age of 4 years, making it one of the youngest in the industry, compared to a
current average age of 10.8 years for the global LNG carrier fleet including LNG carriers of
all sizes as of March 1, 2014 (as estimated by Clarkson Research).

In addition to our owned fleet, we have a 25% ownership interest in Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd.,
an entity whose principal asset is the Methane Nile Eagle. The Methane Nile Eagle is a 145,000 cbm
LNG carrier that was built in 2007. It is currently chartered to a subsidiary of BG Group under a
20-year time charter, which is subject to extension for up to 10 years at BG Group’s option.

Managed Fleet

Through GasLog LNG Services, we provide technical ship management services for 12 LNG

carriers owned by third parties in addition to management of the eight LNG carriers currently
operating in our owned fleet. We supervised the construction by Samsung Heavy Industries of each
LNG carrier in our managed fleet, and each ship has operated under our technical management
since its delivery from the shipyard.

The following table provides information about our managed ships:

Vessel Name

1 Methane Julia Louise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Methane Becki Anne. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 Methane Patricia Camila . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 Methane Mickie Harper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 Methane Kari Elin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6 Methane Rita Andrea(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 Methane Jane Elizabeth(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 Methane Lydon Volney(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9 Methane Shirley Elisabeth(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10 Methane Alison Victoria(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11 Methane Heather Sally(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12 Methane Nile Eagle(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year
Built

2010
2010
2010
2010
2004
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2007

Cargo
Capacity
(cbm)

170,000
170,000
170,000
170,000
138,000
145,000
145,000
145,000
145,000
145,000
145,000
145,000

Propulsion

GasLog
Ownership

TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
TFDE
Steam
Steam
Steam
Steam
Steam
Steam
Steam
Steam

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
25%

Ship Owner

BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
BG Group
Egypt LNG(2)

(1) Denotes LNG carriers in the pool of six ships from which BG Group will nominate three for the Pending Vessel

Acquisition.

(2) The Methane Nile Eagle is owned by Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd., in which we indirectly hold a 25% equity interest. BG
Asia Pacific Ptd. Limited, a subsidiary of BG Group, and Eagle Gas Shipping Co. E.S.A., an entity affiliated with the
government of Egypt, have 25% and 50% equity interests, respectively, in Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd.

Ship Time Charters

We provide the services of our owned ships under time charters. A time charter is a contract
for the use of the ship for a specified term at a daily hire rate. Under a time charter, the ship owner

34

provides crewing and other services related to the ship’s operation, the cost of which is covered by
the hire rate, and the customer is responsible for substantially all of the ship voyage costs (including
bunker fuel, port charges and canal fees and LNG boil-off).

We have entered into three master time charters with a subsidiary of BG Group that establish
the general terms under which the GasLog Savannah, the GasLog Singapore, the GasLog Shanghai,
the GasLog Santiago, the GasLog Sydney and the GasLog Skagen are, and the four newbuildings
identified by hull numbers 2072, 2073, 2102 and 2103 will be, chartered to BG Group. We enter into
separate confirmation memorandums for each ship in order to supplement the master time charter
and specify the charter term, extension options (if any), hire rate and other provisions applicable to
each ship’s charter. For the three vessels to be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition we
will enter into separate time charters for each vessel.

We have entered into maiden voyage time charter agreements and time charter agreements with

a subsidiary of Shell, establishing the terms under which the GasLog Seattle and the newbuilding
identified by hull number 2042 will be chartered to Shell.

Since delivery to GasLog, the GasLog Chelsea has been trading in the LNG shipping spot

market. In 2013 the vessel completed two short term time charters.

The following discussion describes the material terms of the time charters for our owned ships.

Initial Term, Extensions and Redelivery

The initial terms of the time charters for the GasLog Savannah, the GasLog Singapore, the

GasLog Shanghai, the GasLog Santiago, the GasLog Sydney and the GasLog Skagen began upon
delivery of the ships and will terminate in 2015, 2016, 2018, 2018, 2019 and 2021, respectively. The
charter for the GasLog Skagen provides for full employment for three years and a subsequent five
year seasonal charter under which the ship is employed for seven months and available to accept
other charters for five months. BG Group has options to extend the terms of the charters as follows:
for the GasLog Savannah and the GasLog Singapore for up to 7.5 years; for the GasLog Shanghai,
the GasLog Santiago and the GasLog Sydney, for up to 8 years; for the GasLog Skagen for up to
10 years (on the seasonal charter basis); in each case at specified hire rates.

Our time charters for the four newbuildings that will be chartered to BG Group will begin upon

the delivery of each ship, which is scheduled for various dates in 2016. The initial charter terms for
the ships will terminate for two ships in 2026 and for two ships in 2023. BG Group has options to
extend terms of the charters for Hulls No. 2072 and No. 2073 for up to 5 years and Hulls No. 2102
and No. 2103 for up to 8 years, all at specified hire rates.

The initial term of the time charter for the GasLog Seattle began, and for Hull No. 2042 will
begin, upon delivery of the ship following an initial period during which the ships will operate under
a maiden voyage time charter, the purpose of which is to facilitate completion by Shell of an
operational discharge inspection of the ship. Hull No. 2042 is scheduled for delivery in 2014. The
time charters for the GasLog Seattle and Hull No. 2042 will terminate in 2020 and 2021,
respectively. In each case, Shell has options to extend the charter terms for up to 10 years at
specified hire rates.

The initial term of the time charters for the three vessels to be acquired under the Pending

Vessel Acquisition will begin upon delivery to GasLog and will terminate in 2020. BG Group will
have options to extend the term of the time charters for two of the ships for an additional period of
either three or five years beyond 2020.

The terms and period for fixtures of the GasLog Chelsea vary from charter to charter, as is the
nature of trading in the spot market. Commencing in mid-2014, the vessel will be fixed for an initial
7 month term with options for further extension.

Our time charters provide for redelivery of the ship to us at the expiration of the term, as such
term may be extended upon the charterer’s exercise of its extension options (if any), or upon earlier
termination of the charter (as described below). Under all of our charters, the charterer has the
right to extend the term for most periods in which the ship is off-hire, as described below. Our

35

charter contracts do not provide the charterers with options to purchase our ships during or upon
expiration of the charter term.

Hire Rate Provisions

“Hire” rate refers to the basic payment from the customer for use of the ship. Under all of our

time charters, the hire rate is payable to us monthly in advance in U.S. dollars. Depending on the
time charter contract, there are three methods by which the daily hire rate for our owned ships is
determined:

• Under the first method, the hire rate includes two components—a capital cost component and
an operating cost component. The capital cost component relates to the cost of the ship’s
purchase and is a fixed daily amount that is structured to provide a return on our invested
capital. Some of the charters provide for the capital cost component to increase by a specified
amount during any option period. The operating cost component is a fixed daily amount that
increases annually at a fixed percentage. Although the daily amount of the operating cost
component is fixed (subject to a specified annual increase), it is intended to correspond to the
costs of operating the ship and related expenses. In the event of a material increase or
decrease in the actual costs we incur in operating the ship, a clause in the charter provides
each party the right in certain circumstances to seek a review and potential adjustment of the
operating cost component. Under one of our time charters, the hire rate for an initial period
of three years is as discussed above and the subsequent five years are a seasonal charter
under which the ship is committed for seven consecutive months at a fixed monthly charter
hire (one component) and available to accept other charters for the remaining five months.
• Under the second method, the hire rate includes only one component that is a fixed daily

amount that will either remain the same or increase by a specified amount during any option
period as compared to the firm period.

• Under the third method, the hire rate for an initial period of up to two years, at the

charterer’s option, will be set at the prevailing market rate for a comparable ship, subject to a
cap and a floor. Following such initial period, the hire rate will be calculated based on three
components—a capital cost component, an operating cost component and a ship management
fee. The capital cost component is a fixed daily amount, which will increase by a specified
amount during any option period. The daily amount of the operating cost component, which
is intended to fully pass-through to the charterer the costs of operating the ship, is set
annually and adjusted at the end of each year to compensate us for the actual costs we incur
in operating the ship. Drydocking expenses are budgeted in advance and are reimbursed by
the charterers immediately following a drydocking. The ship management fee is a daily
amount set in line with industry practice for fees charged by ship managers and is intended to
compensate us for management of the ship.

The hire rates for each of our ships may be reduced if the ship does not perform to certain of

its specifications or if we are in breach of our obligations under the charter. We have had no
instances of hire rate reductions since the first two of our owned ships commenced operations in
2010.

Off-Hire

When a ship is “off-hire”—or not available for service—a time charterer generally is not

required to pay the hire rate, and we remain responsible for all costs, including the cost of any LNG
cargo lost as boil-off during such off-hire periods. Our time charters provide an annual allowance
period for us to schedule preventative maintenance work on the ship. A ship generally will be
deemed off-hire under our time charters if there is a specified time outside of the annual allowance
period when the ship is not available for the charterer’s use due to, among other things, operational
deficiencies (including the failure to maintain a certain guaranteed speed), drydocking for repairs,
maintenance or inspection, equipment breakdowns, deficiency of personnel or neglect of duty by the
ship’s officers or crew, deviation from course, or delays due to accidents, quarantines, ship

36

detentions or similar problems. We have obtained loss of hire insurance to protect us against loss of
income as a result of a ship being off-hire. See “—Risk of Loss, Insurance and Risk Management—
Loss of Hire Insurance”.

All ships are drydocked at least once every five years as required by the ship’s classification

society for a special survey. Our ships are considered to be off-hire under our time charters during
such periods.

Ship Management and Maintenance

Under our time charters, we are responsible for the technical management of our ships,

including engagement and provision of qualified crews, employment of armed guards for transport in
certain high-risk areas, maintaining the ship, arranging supply of stores and equipment, cleaning and
painting and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations, including licensing and certification
requirements, as well as for drydocking expenses under certain charters. We provide these
management services through our wholly owned subsidiary, GasLog LNG Services.

Termination and Cancellation

Under our time charters, each party has certain termination rights which include, among other
things, the automatic termination of a charter upon loss of the relevant ship. Either party may elect
to terminate a charter upon the occurrence of specified defaults or upon the outbreak of war or
hostilities involving two or more major nations, such as the United States or the People’s Republic
of China, if such war or hostilities materially and adversely affect the trading of the ship for a
period of at least 30 days. In addition, our charterers have the option to terminate a charter if the
relevant ship is off-hire for any reason other than scheduled drydocking for a period exceeding 90
consecutive days, or for more than 90 days or 110 days, depending on the charter, in any one-year
period. Certain of our charters give the charterer a termination option for shorter periods of off-
hire, if such off-hire is due to an uncured breach of our obligations to maintain the applicable ship.

In addition to its termination rights, Shell has the right to convert the time charter with respect
to the relevant ship into a bareboat charter upon the occurrence of specified defaults or in the event
that Shell’s quality assurance review is not successfully completed upon delivery of the ship.

All of the time charters applicable to our newbuildings permit the charterer to cancel the
charter in the event of a prolonged delay in the delivery of the ship from the shipyard, and in
certain circumstances obligate us to pay liquidated damages to the charterer in the event of a less
significant delivery delay. However, the cancellation and liquidated damages provisions in our
charters are structured to mirror the provisions of our contracts with the shipyard, giving us the right
to receive liquidated damages from the shipyard or cancel the shipbuilding contract in the same
circumstances that would trigger the charterer’s right to cancel the charter contract or receive
liquidated damages because of delivery delays.

Shipbuilding Contracts

We have entered into shipbuilding contracts with Samsung Heavy Industries in respect of each

of our seven newbuildings, which have an aggregate contract price of approximately $1.39 billion. As
of March 26, 2014, the outstanding balance of $1.26 billion in the aggregate was payable under each
contract in installments upon steel cutting, keel laying and launching of the ship, with the largest
portion of the purchase price for each ship coming due upon its delivery. All of our obligations
under the shipbuilding contracts are payable in U.S. dollars.

37

As of December 31, 2013, our remaining payment obligations under the shipbuilding contracts

were as follows:

Amounts due in less than one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts due in one to three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts due in three to five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

As of
December 31, 2013(1)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
$ 376,950
897,856
—

Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,274,806

(1) Amounts do not reflect an installment of $9.96 million paid in 2014.

The shipbuilding contracts provide for the seven newbuildings to be delivered and ready for

immediate operation on various dates in 2014 through 2016. The shipbuilding contracts require
Samsung Heavy Industries to pay us liquidated damages in the event of certain delays in the
delivery of a ship unless such delays are attributable to a force majeure event, and in the event of a
prolonged delay we would have the right to cancel the contract and receive a refund of any
installment payments previously made on the ship.

In the event that we fail to meet our payment obligations under a shipbuilding contract, we
would be in default under the applicable contract and would be obligated to pay interest under the
contract. If such a default by us were to continue for more than five business days, the delivery date
of the applicable ship would be delayed by one day for each day that we remain in default, and if a
default by us were to continue for more than 15 business days, Samsung Heavy Industries would
have the option of cancelling the applicable shipbuilding contract and retaining any installment
payments previously funded by us under the contract.

In addition to our newbuildings on order, we have options with Samsung Heavy Industries to

order six additional LNG carriers. The option contracts expire at the end of the first quarter of
2014. We have not yet decided whether we will exercise the options.

Ship Management Services and Construction Supervision

Management of our owned fleet, which includes plan approval for new ship orders, supervision

of ship construction and planning and supervision of drydockings, as well as technical operations,
crewing, training, maintenance, regulatory and classification compliance and HSSE management and
reporting, is provided in-house by our wholly owned subsidiary, GasLog LNG Services, an entity
incorporated in Bermuda with an office in Piraeus, Greece. In addition to management of our
owned fleet, through GasLog LNG Services we provide technical ship management services for a
fleet of 12 ships, which consists of 11 ships we manage on behalf of BG Group (three of which will
be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition) and the Methane Nile Eagle, a ship in which we
have a 25% ownership interest. During the year ended December 31, 2013, ship management
services provided to external customers accounted for approximately 7.52% of our consolidated
revenues.

Construction Supervision

We supervise and manage the construction of our newbuildings through GasLog LNG Services.

We have employees on-site at Samsung Heavy Industries in South Korea whose responsibilities
include inspecting the ships under construction for non-conformities, attending trials of the ship and
its machinery and equipment, consulting with the shipyard in the event of any modifications to the
ship’s specifications, reviewing the shipyard’s choice of suppliers and sub-contractors and keeping our
management informed of the progress of the construction. Through GasLog LNG Services, we also
supervised the construction of the 11 LNG carriers in BG Group’s owned fleet and the Methane
Nile Eagle, all of which were constructed at Samsung Heavy Industries.

38

Technical and Operational Management

Pursuant to ship management agreements, through GasLog LNG Services we manage the day-

to-day aspects of ship operations, including crewing, training, insurance, maintenance and repair,
procurement of supplies, regulatory and classification compliance and HSSE management and
reporting, for our owned fleet and for the 12 ships in our managed fleet. We utilize certain third-
party sub-contractors and suppliers in carrying out our technical management responsibilities. In the
case of ships owned by BG Group and Egypt LNG, the crewing and other operational costs are
fully passed-through to the ship owner, and for our technical management services the customers pay
us a management fee per ship per month.

In connection with our ship management services, we also enter into consultant service

agreements pursuant to which we provide specialized services relating to the management of LNG
carriers. These services include the development and installation of a ship’s ship management system,
which includes installing onboard hardware and software systems and providing related training to
the ship’s personnel.

The terms of our ship management agreements and related contracts permit the customer to

terminate our services for any reason upon a short period of advance notice, and both parties have
termination rights upon the occurrence of specified defaults. In the event of the loss of a ship, or
the owner’s sale of a ship to a third party, the ship management agreement in respect of the ship
would terminate automatically. Under our ship management agreements with BG Group, in some
circumstances BG Group would obligated to reimburse us for certain crew support and severance
costs incurred as a result of a termination of the ship management agreement by BG Group.

Competition

We operate in markets that are highly competitive and based primarily on supply and demand.
Generally, competition for LNG time charters is based primarily on price, ship availability, size, age,
technical specifications and condition, LNG shipping experience, quality and efficiency of ship
operations, shipping industry relationships and reputation for customer service, and technical ability
and reputation for operation of highly specialized ships. In addition, through GasLog Chelsea we
operate in the spot market that covers short-term charters of one year or less.

Although we believe that we are one of the few independent owners that focus on newly-built,

technically advanced LNG carriers and provide in-house technical management of the fleet, other
independent shipping companies also own and operate, and in some cases manage, LNG carriers and
have new ships under construction. There are other ship owners and managers who may also
attempt to participate in the LNG market in the future. We believe that our strategy of focusing on
charter contracts with initial terms of five to ten years, as well as the scale of our technical ship
management operations, differentiates us to some extent from other independent owners.

In addition to independent owners, some of the major oil and gas producers own LNG carriers
and have in the recent past contracted for the construction of new LNG carriers. National gas and
shipping companies also have large fleets of LNG carriers that have expanded and may continue to
expand. Some of these companies may compete with independent owners by using their fleets to
carry LNG for third parties.

Crewing and Employees

As of December 31, 2013 we had 103 full-time employees and 23 contractors and outsourced
employees, all of whom are based in our offices in Piraeus, Greece, Monaco, or the newbuildings
site at Samsung Heavy Industries in South Korea. In addition to our shoreside employees and sub-
contractors, we had approximately 1,037 seafaring staff serving on our owned and managed ships.
These seafarers are retained through crewing agencies based in Ukraine, the Philippines and Spain
or, in the case of Greek seafarers, through short-term employment contracts. As we take delivery of
our newbuildings, we expect to retain a significant number of additional seafarers qualified to man
and operate our new ships, as well as additional shoreside personnel. We intend to focus our hiring

39

efforts in the Ukrainian, Philippine and Spanish markets, where we have crewing agency agreements
in place, and in Greece.

LNG marine transportation is a specialized area requiring technically skilled officers and crew

with specialized training. We regard attracting and retaining motivated, well-qualified seagoing
personnel as a top priority, and we offer our crew competitive compensation packages. In addition,
we provide intensive onboard training for our officers and crews to instill a culture of the highest
operational and safety standards. As a result, we have historically enjoyed a high retention rate
among our officers and other seafarers. In 2013, our retention rate was 93.0% for senior officers,
96.0% for other officers and 96.7% for shore staff.

Although we have historically experienced a high retention rate for our seafarers, the demand

for technically skilled officers and crews to serve on LNG carriers has been increasing as the global
fleet of LNG carriers continues to grow. This increased demand has and may continue to put
inflationary pressure on crew costs. However, we expect that the impact of cost increases would be
mitigated to some extent by certain provisions in our time charters, including review provisions and
cost pass-through provisions.

Classification, Inspection and Maintenance

Every large, commercial seagoing ship must be “classed” by a classification society. The
classification society certifies that the ship is “in class”, signifying that the ship has been built and
maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable
rules and regulations of the ship’s country of registry and the international conventions of which that
country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and
corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on
application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned. The classification
society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and
requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case
and/or to the regulations of the country concerned.

To ensure each ship is maintained in accordance with classification society standards and for

maintenance of the class certificate, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull and machinery,
including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed are required to be performed
periodically. Surveys are based on a five-year cycle that consists of annual surveys, intermediate
surveys that are typically completed between the second and third years of every five-year cycle, and
comprehensive special surveys (also known as class renewal surveys) that are completed at each fifth
anniversary of the ship’s delivery.

All areas subject to surveys as defined by the classification society are required to be surveyed

at least once per five-year class cycle, unless shorter intervals between surveys are otherwise
prescribed. All ships are also required to be drydocked at least once during every five-year class
cycle for inspection of their underwater parts and for repairs related to inspections. If any defects
are found, the classification surveyor will issue a “recommendation” which must be rectified by the
ship owner within prescribed time limits. We intend to drydock our ships at five-year intervals that
coincide with the completion of the ship’s special survey.

Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a ship be certified

as “in class” by a classification society that is a member of the International Association of
Classification Societies. All but one of our delivered ships is certified by the American Bureau of
Shipping, or “ABS”; the other delivered ship is certified by the Det Norske Veritas. Each ship has
been awarded ISM certification and is currently “in class”. Under our shipbuilding contracts, all of
our contracted newbuildings must be certified prior to delivery to us.

40

The following table lists the dates by which we expect to carry out the initial drydockings and

special surveys for our owned fleet:

Ship Name

GasLog Savannah. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Singapore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Chelsea. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Shanghai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Santiago. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Sydney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Skagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Seattle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pending Vessel #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pending Vessel #2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pending Vessel #3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2042. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2043. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2044. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2072. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2073. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2102. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hull No. 2103. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Drydocking and
Special Survey

2015
2015
2015
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2015/2016
2015/2016
2015/2016
2019
2019
2020
2021
2021
2021
2021

Risk of Loss, Insurance and Risk Management

The operation of any ship has inherent risks. These risks include mechanical failure, personal
injury, collision, property loss or damage, ship or cargo loss or damage and business interruption due
to a number of reasons, including mechanical failure, political circumstances in foreign countries,
hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marine disaster,
including explosion, spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning
and operating ships in international trade.

We maintain hull and machinery insurance on all our owned ships against marine and war risks

in amounts that we believe to be prudent to cover such risks. In addition, we maintain protection
and indemnity insurance on all our owned ships up to the maximum insurable limit available at any
given time. We also maintain ship manager insurance in respect of our managed fleet. While we
believe that our insurance coverage will be adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be
no guarantee that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates
or at all, or that any specific claim we may make under our insurance coverage will be paid.

Hull & Machinery Marine Risks Insurance and Hull & Machinery War Risks Insurance

We maintain hull and machinery marine risks insurance and hull and machinery war risks
insurance on our owned ships, which cover loss of or damage to a ship due to marine perils such as
collisions, fire or lightning, and loss of or damage to a ship due to war perils such as acts of war,
terrorism or piracy. Each of our ships is insured under these policies for a total amount that exceeds
what we believe to be its fair market value. We also maintain hull disbursements and increased
value insurance policies covering each of our owned ships, which provide additional coverage in the
event of the total or constructive loss of a ship. Our marine risks insurance policies contain
deductible amounts for which we will be responsible, but there are no deductible amounts under our
war risks policies or our total loss policies.

Loss of Hire Insurance

We have obtained loss of hire insurance to protect us against loss of income as a result of a

ship being off-hire or otherwise suffering a loss of operational time for events falling under the
terms of our hull and machinery insurance or hull and machinery war risks insurance. Under our

41

loss of hire policy, our insurer will pay us the hire rate agreed in respect of each ship for each day,
in excess of a certain number of deductible days, for the time that the ship is out of service as a
result of damage, for a maximum of 180 days. The number of deductible days for the ships in our
fleet is 14 days per ship.

Additionally, we buy piracy loss of hire and kidnap and ransom insurance when our ships are
ordered to sail through the Indian Ocean to insure against potential losses relating to the hijacking
of a ship and its crew by pirates.

Protection and Indemnity Insurance

Protection and indemnity insurance is typically provided by a protection and indemnity
association, or “P&I association”, and covers third-party liability, crew liability and other related
expenses resulting from injury to or death of crew, passengers and other third parties, loss of or
damage to cargo, third-party claims arising from collisions with other ships (to the extent not
recovered by the hull and machinery policies), damage to other third-party property, pollution
arising from oil or other substances and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck
removal.

Our protection and indemnity insurance covering our owned ships is provided by P&I
associations that are members of the International Group of Protection and Indemnity Clubs, or
“International Group”. The thirteen P&I associations that comprise the International Group insure
approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement
to reinsure each association’s liabilities. Insurance provided by a P&I association is a form of mutual
indemnity insurance.

Our protection and indemnity insurance is currently subject to limits of $3 billion per ship per

event in respect of liability to passengers and seamen, $2 billion per ship per event in respect of
liability to passengers, and $1 billion per ship per event in respect of liability for oil pollution.

As a member of a P&I association, we will be subject to calls payable to the P&I association

based on the International Group’s claim records as well as the claim records of all other members
of the P&I association of which we are a member.

Permits and Authorizations

We are required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain
permits, licenses, financial assurances and certificates with respect to our ships. The kinds of permits,
licenses, financial assurances and certificates required will depend upon several factors, including the
waters in which the ship operates, the nationality of the ship’s crew and the age of the ship. We
have obtained all permits, licenses, financial assurances and certificates currently required to operate
our ships. Additional laws and regulations, environmental or otherwise, may be adopted which could
limit our ability to do business or increase the cost of our doing business.

Environmental and Other Regulation

The carriage, handling, storage and regasification of LNG are subject to extensive laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment, health and safety and other matters. These
laws and regulations include international conventions and national, state and local laws and
regulations in the countries where our ships now or in the future will operate, or where our ships
are registered. Compliance with these laws and regulations may entail significant expense and may
impact the resale value or useful lives of our ships. Our ships may be subject to both scheduled and
unscheduled inspections by a variety of governmental, quasi-governmental and private organizations,
including the local port authorities, national authorities, harbor masters or equivalent, classification
societies, flag state administrations (countries of registry) and charterers. Our failure to maintain
permits, licenses, certificates or other authorizations required by some of these entities could require
us to incur substantial costs or result in the temporary suspension of the operation of one or more
of our ships or lead to the invalidation or reduction of our insurance coverage.

42

We believe that our ships are operated in material compliance with applicable environmental
laws and regulations and that our ships in operation have all material permits, licenses, certificates
or other authorizations necessary for the conduct of our operations. In fact, each of our delivered
ships have received, and each of our seven newbuildings on order is expected to receive, an
ENVIRO, an ENVIRO+ or a CLEAN notation from our classification societies, which denote
compliance with their published guidelines concerning stringent criteria for environmental protection
related to design characteristics, management and support systems, sea discharges and air emissions.
Because environmental laws and regulations are frequently changed and may impose increasingly
stricter requirements, however, it is difficult to accurately predict the ultimate cost of complying with
these requirements or the impact of these requirements on the resale value or useful lives of our
ships. Moreover, additional legislation or regulation applicable to the operation of our ships that
may be implemented in the future, such as in response to a serious marine incident like the 2010
Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, could negatively affect our profitability.

International Maritime Regulations

The IMO, the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by
ships, has adopted several international conventions that regulate the international shipping industry,
including the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, the International
Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, and the MARPOL Convention. The
MARPOL Convention establishes environmental standards relating to oil leakage or spilling, garbage
management, sewage, air emissions, handling and disposal of noxious liquids and the handling of
harmful substances in packaged form. The International Safety Management Code for the Safe
Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, or “ISM Code”, promulgated by the IMO,
requires, among other things, that the party with operational control of a ship develop an extensive
safety management system, including the adoption of a policy for safety and environmental
protection setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its ships safely and also describing
procedures for responding to emergencies. Through GasLog LNG Services, we have developed a
safety management system for our ships that meets these requirements.

Ships that transport gas, including LNG carriers, are also subject to regulation under the
International Gas Carrier Code, or “IGC Code”, published by the IMO. The IGC Code prescribes
design and construction standards for ships involved in the transport of gas. Compliance with the
IGC Code must be evidenced by a Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases of
Bulk. Each of our ships is in compliance with the IGC Code and each of our newbuilding contracts
requires that the ship receive certification that it is in compliance with applicable regulations before
it is delivered. Non-compliance with the IGC Code or other applicable IMO regulations may subject
a ship owner or a bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available
insurance coverage for affected ships and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some
ports.

In September 1997, the IMO adopted Annex VI to MARPOL to address air pollution from
ships. Annex VI came into force on May 19, 2005. It sets limits on sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide
emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such
as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also includes a global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil and
allows for special areas to be established with more stringent controls on sulfur emissions. Annex VI
has been ratified by some, but not all, IMO member states. In October 2008, the Marine
Environment Protection Committee, or “MEPC”, of the IMO approved amendments to Annex VI
regarding particulate matter, nitrogen oxide and sulfur oxide emissions standards. These amendments
entered into force in July 2010. They seek to reduce air pollution from ships by establishing a series
of progressive standards to further limit the sulfur content in fuel oil, which would be phased in by
2020, and by establishing new tiers of nitrogen oxide emission standards for new marine diesel
engines, depending on their date of installation. Additionally, more stringent emission standards
could apply in coastal areas designated as Emission Control Areas, or “ECAs”. The European
Union Directive 2005/EC/33, which became effective on January 1, 2010, parallels Annex VI and
requires ships to use reduced sulfur content fuel for their main and auxiliary engines. Our owned
ships currently in operation comply with the relevant legislation and have the relevant certificates,

43

and we intend to take all necessary steps to obtain International Air Pollution Prevention certificates
evidencing compliance with Annex VI requirements for all of our ships.

Although the United States is not a party, many countries have ratified the International
Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, as amended, or the “CLC”. Under
this convention and depending on whether the country in which the damage results is a party to the
1992 Protocol to the CLC, a ship’s registered owner is strictly liable for pollution damage caused in
the territorial waters of a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject under certain
circumstances to certain defenses and limitations. Ships trading to states that are parties to these
conventions must provide evidence of insurance covering the liability of the owner. In jurisdictions
where the CLC has not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law govern, and
liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to the CLC.

The IMO also has adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil
Pollution Damage, or the “Bunker Convention”, which imposes liability on ship owners for pollution
damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of bunker fuel and requires
registered owners of ships over 1,000 gross tons to maintain insurance for pollution damage in an
amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation
regime. We maintain insurance in respect of our owned ships that satisfies these requirements.

Noncompliance with the ISM Code or with other IMO regulations may subject a ship owner or

bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for
affected ships and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports, including
United States and European Union ports.

United States

Oil Pollution Act and CERCLA

Because our ships could trade with the United States or its territories or possessions and/or
operate in U.S. waters, our operations could be impacted by the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or
“OPA”, which establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental protection
and cleanup of oil spills, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, or “CERCLA”, which imposes liability for cleanup and natural resource damage from
the release of hazardous substances (other than oil). Under OPA, ship owners, operators and
bareboat charterers are responsible parties who are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the
spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all
containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from oil spills from their ships. OPA
currently limits the liability of responsible parties with respect to ships over 3,000 gross tons to the
greater of $2,000 per gross ton or $17,088,000 per double hull ship and permits individual states to
impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their
boundaries. Some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of
pollutants within their waters. CERCLA applies to owners and operators of ships and contains a
similar liability regime. Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or
$5.0 million for ships carrying a hazardous substance as cargo and the greater of $300 per gross ton
or $0.5 million for any other ship.

These limits of liability do not apply under certain circumstances, however, such as where the

incident is caused by violation of applicable U.S. Federal safety, construction or operating
regulations, or by the responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. In addition, a
marine incident that results in significant damage to the environment, such as the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill, could result in amendments to these limitations or other regulatory changes in the
future. We maintain the maximum pollution liability coverage amount of $1 billion per incident for
our owned ships. We also believe that we will be in substantial compliance with OPA, CERCLA
and all applicable state regulations in the ports where our ships will call.

OPA also requires owners and operators of ships to establish and maintain with the National
Pollution Fund Center of the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet
the limit of their potential strict liability under the act. Such financial responsibility can be

44

demonstrated by providing a guarantee from an appropriate guarantor, who can release the required
guarantee to the National Pollution Fund Center against payment of the requested premium. We
have received the mandatory certificates of financial responsibility from the U.S. Coast Guard in
respect of all of our delivered ships and intend to receive such certificates in the future for each of
our ships required to have them.

Clean Water Act

The U.S. Clean Water Act of 1972, or “CWA”, prohibits the discharge of oil, hazardous
substances and ballast water in U.S. navigable waters unless authorized by a duly-issued permit or
exemption, and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. The
CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and
complements the remedies available under OPA and CERCLA. Furthermore, most U.S. states that
border a navigable waterway have enacted environmental pollution laws that impose strict liability
on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a
hazardous substance. These laws may be more stringent than U.S. Federal law.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency, or “EPA”, has enacted rules requiring
ballast water discharges and other discharges incidental to the normal operation of certain ships
within United States waters to be authorized under the Ship General Permit for Discharges
Incidental to the Normal Operation of Ships, or the “VGP”. To be covered by the VGP, owners of
certain ships must submit a Notice of Intent, or “NOI”, at least 30 days before the ship operates in
United States waters. Compliance with the VGP could require the installation of equipment on our
ships to treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other disposal
arrangements, and/or otherwise restrict our ships from entering United States waters. In March 2013,
the EPA published a new VGP to replace the existing VGP, which expired in December 2013. The
new VGP includes numeric effluent limits for ballast water expressed as the maximum concentration
of living organisms in ballast water expressed as the maximum concentration of living organisms in
ballast water. The new VGP also imposes a variety of changes for non-ballast water discharges
including more stringent Best Management Practices for discharges of oil-to-sea interfaces in an
effort to reduce the toxicity of oil leaked into U.S. water. We have submitted NOIs for all of our
delivered ships and intend to submit NOIs for our ships in the future where required and do not
believe that the costs associated with obtaining and complying with the VGP will have a significant
impact on our operations.

Clean Air Act

The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 and
1990, or the “CAA”, requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile
organic compounds and other air contaminants. Our ships may be subject to vapor control and
recovery requirements for certain cargoes when loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning and
conducting other operations in regulated port areas and emission standards for so-called “Category
3” marine diesel engines operating in U.S. waters. The marine diesel engine emission standards are
currently limited to new engines beginning with the 2004 model year. On April 30, 2010, the EPA
adopted final emission standards for Category 3 marine diesel engines equivalent to those adopted in
the amendments to Annex VI to MARPOL, which will apply in two stages, beginning in 2011 and
2016. However, our tri-fuel diesel electric LNG carriers have the ability to burn natural gas as fuel
to power the ship, which can significantly reduce relevant emissions compared with steam-powered
ships.

The CAA also requires states to adopt State Implementation Plans, or “SIPs”, designed to
attain national health-based air quality standards in primarily major metropolitan and/or industrial
areas. Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from ship loading and unloading operations by
requiring the installation of vapor control equipment. The MEPC has designated the area extending
200 miles from the territorial sea baseline adjacent to the Atlantic/Gulf and Pacific coasts and the
eight main Hawaiian Islands as an ECA, which entered into force in August 2012, under the Annex
VI amendments. Fuel used by vessels operating in the ECA cannot exceed 1.0% sulfur, dropping to

45

0.1% sulfur in 2015. From 2016, NOx after-treatment requirements will also apply. Similar
restrictions will be phased in for the newly-designated Caribbean ECA adjacent to Puerto Rico and
the U.S. Virgin Islands beginning in 2014. Our vessels can store and burn low-sulfur fuel oil or
alternatively burn natural gas which contains no sulfur. Additionally, burning natural gas will ensure
compliance with IMO tier III NOx emission limitations without the need for after-treatment.
Charterers must supply compliant fuel for the vessels before ordering vessels to trade in areas where
restrictions apply. As a result, we do not expect such restrictions to have a materially adverse impact
on our operations or costs.

Other Environmental Initiatives

U.S. Coast Guard regulations adopted under the U.S. National Invasive Species Act, or
“NISA”, impose mandatory ballast water management practices for all ships equipped with ballast
water tanks entering U.S. waters, which could require the installation of equipment on our ships to
treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal
arrangements or procedures, and/or otherwise restrict our ships from entering U.S. waters. In June
2012, the U.S. Coast Guard rule establishing standards for the allowable concentration of living
organisms in ballast water discharged in U.S. waters and requiring the phase-in of Coast Guard
approved ballast water management systems, or “BWMS” became effective. The Coast Guard will
review the practicability of implementing a more stringent ballast water discharge standard and
publish the results no later than January 1, 2016. The rule requires installation of Coast Guard
approved BWMS by new vessels constructed on or after December 1, 2013 and existing vessels as of
their first drydocking after January 1, 2016. Several states have adopted legislation and regulations
relating to the permitting and management of ballast water discharges.

At the international level, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and
Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments in February 2004, or the “BWM Convention”.
The Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water
exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM
Convention will not enter into force until 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 states, the
combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the world’s
merchant shipping. To date, a sufficient number of countries have not adopted this convention for it
to enter into force. However, the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee passed a
resolution in March 2010 encouraging the ratification of the Convention and calling upon those
countries that have already ratified to encourage the installation of ballast water management
systems. While we believe that our delivered ships comply with existing requirements, if new ballast
water treatment requirements are instituted, the cost of compliance could increase for ocean carriers.
It is difficult to accurately predict the overall impact of such a requirement on our operations.

Greenhouse Gas Regulations

The MEPC of IMO adopted two new sets of mandatory requirements to address greenhouse gas

emissions from ships at its July 2011 meeting. The Energy Efficiency Design Index requires a
minimum energy efficiency level per capacity mile and is applicable to new vessels, and the Ship
Energy Efficiency Management Plan is applicable to currently operating vessels. The requirements,
which entered into force in January 2013, could cause us to incur additional compliance costs. To
meet the requirements, we have an agreement with ABS for the development of a Company Energy
Efficiency Management Plan and the Ship-specific Energy Efficiency Management Plan based on
certain documents issued by the IMO. The IMO is also considering the development of a market-
based mechanism for greenhouse gas emissions from ships, but it is impossible to predict the
likelihood that such a standard might be adopted or its potential impact on our operations at this
time.

The European Union has indicated that it intends to propose an expansion of the existing
European Union emissions trading scheme to include emissions of greenhouse gases from marine
ships. In the United States, the EPA has issued a finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public
health and safety and has adopted regulations under the CAA to limit greenhouse gas emissions

46

from certain mobile sources and large stationary sources. Although the mobile source emissions do
not apply to greenhouse gas emissions from ships, the EPA is considering a petition from the
California Attorney General and environmental groups to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from
ocean-going ships. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the
IMO, the European Union, the United States or other countries where we operate, or any treaty
adopted at the international level to succeed the Kyoto Protocol, that restrict emissions of
greenhouse gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures that we cannot predict
with certainty at this time.

We believe that LNG carriers, which have the inherent ability to burn natural gas to power the
ship, and in particular LNG carriers like ours that utilize fuel-efficient diesel electric propulsion, can
be considered among the cleanest of large ships in terms of emissions.

Ship Security Regulations

A number of initiatives have been introduced in recent years intended to enhance ship security.
On November 25, 2002, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or “MTSA”, was signed
into law. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations in
July 2003 requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard ships operating in
waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to
SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. This
new chapter came into effect in July 2004 and imposes various detailed security obligations on ships
and port authorities, most of which are contained in the newly created International Ship and Port
Facilities Security Code, or “ISPS Code”. Among the various requirements are:

• on-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance ship-to-ship and ship-to-

shore communications;

• on-board installation of ship security alert systems;
• the development of ship security plans; and
• compliance with flag state security certification requirements.
The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to align with international maritime security
standards, exempt non-U.S. ships from MTSA ship security measures, provided such ships have on
board a valid “International Ship Security Certificate” that attests to the ship’s compliance with
SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. We have implemented the various security
measures required by the IMO, SOLAS and the ISPS Code and have approved ISPS certificates and
plans certified by the applicable flag state on board all our ships.

C. Organizational Structure

GasLog Ltd. is a holding company incorporated in Bermuda. As of March 26, 2014, it has 27
subsidiaries which are incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, Monaco, Bermuda and the Marshall
Islands (22 as of December 31, 2013). Of our subsidiaries, 18 either own vessels in our fleet or are
parties to contracts to obtain newbuild vessels or acquire secondhand vessels. Our subsidiaries are
wholly owned by us. A list of our subsidiaries is set forth in Exhibit 8.1 to this annual report.

D. Property, Plant and Equipment

Other than our ships, we do not own any material property. Our vessels are subject to priority
mortgages, which secure our obligations under our various credit facilities. For information on our
vessels, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Fleet”. For further
details regarding our credit facilities, refer to “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities”.

We occupy office space at 7 Rue du Gabian, MC 98000, Monaco, which is provided pursuant to

a lease agreement between our subsidiary, GasLog Monaco S.A.M., and a third-party property
owner. We also occupy office space at 69 Akti Miaouli, Piraeus, GR 185 37, Greece, which we lease
through our subsidiary, GasLog LNG Services, from an entity controlled by Ceres Shipping, and at

47

14 Headfort Place, London SWIX 7DH, United Kingdom, which we lease from Unisea Maritime
Limited, an entity owned by our Chairman. The lease agreement is disclosed and filed with the
Greek authorities, and has been entered into on market rates.

For more information about the contractual arrangements for our office space, see “Item 7.

Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions”.

ITEM 4.A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

48

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this
annual report. This discussion includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors”
and elsewhere in this annual report, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements. Please see the section “Forward-Looking Statements” at the
beginning of this annual report.

Overview

We are a growth-oriented international owner, operator and manager of LNG carriers. Our
owned fleet consists of 18 wholly owned LNG carriers, including two ships delivered to us in 2010,
five ships delivered to us in 2013, one on-the-water ship acquired in 2013, the three ships that will
be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition and seven LNG carriers on order. We currently
manage and operate 20 LNG carriers including the ships under the Pending Vessel Acquisition, and
we are supervising the construction of our newbuildings. We have secured multi-year and seasonal
time charter contracts for seven of the ships already delivered to us, five of our seven newbuildings
on order and the three ships under the Pending Vessel Acquisition. From December 31, 2013 these
contracts are expected to provide total contracted revenue of $2.5 billion during their initial terms,
which expire between 2015 and 2026.

In addition to our committed order book, we have options to purchase six additional LNG
carriers from Samsung Heavy Industries that expire in the end of the first quarter of 2014, and we
have a 25% interest in an additional ship, the Methane Nile Eagle, a 2007-built LNG carrier owned
by Egypt LNG and technically managed by us that is currently operating under a 20-year time
charter to a subsidiary of BG Group. The information about our owned fleet presented in this
annual report does not include our ownership interest in the Methane Nile Eagle.

We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of two

segments: vessel ownership and vessel management. Our vessel ownership segment generates
revenues by chartering our ships to customers on time charters at rates that are generally fixed but
contain a variable component, such as an inflation adjustment or an adjustment based on the actual
expenses we incur in operating the ship. Our current time charters have initial terms of up to ten
years and include options that permit the charterers to extend the terms for successive periods under
hire rate provisions that are comparable to those prevailing at the end of the expiring term. We will
continue to evaluate the attractiveness of longer and shorter term chartering opportunities as the
commercial characteristics of the LNG carrier industry evolve. We have structured our order book
of new LNG carriers to have staggered delivery dates, facilitating a smooth integration of the ships
into our fleet as well as significant annual growth through 2016. This has the additional advantage of
spreading our exposure to the re-employment of these ships over several years upon expiration of
their current charters.

Six of our owned ships, the GasLog Savannah, the GasLog Singapore, the GasLog Shanghai,

the GasLog Santiago, the GasLog Sydney and the GasLog Skagen have been chartered to BG
Group since their delivery from the shipyard under multi-year time charters. The GasLog Seattle has
been chartered to Shell since its delivery from the shipyard under multi-year time charter. We have
entered into fixed time charter agreements with BG Group and Shell pursuant to which five of our
newbuildings and the three ships to be acquired from under the Pending Vessel Acquisition will be
chartered to BG Group upon delivery and one of our newbuildings will be chartered to Shell upon
delivery. The GasLog Chelsea has been operating in the spot market since its delivery.

Our vessel management segment, the operations of which are carried out through our wholly

owned subsidiary GasLog LNG Services, generates revenues by offering plan approval and
construction supervision services in connection with newbuilding LNG carriers and providing
technical ship management services, including crewing, training, maintenance, regulatory and
classification compliance and HSSE management and reporting, for our owned fleet as well as the
ships in our managed fleet. Under the vessel management segment, we also record revenues for

49

commercial management services that are invoiced by GasLog Ltd. to our own fleet in accordance
with the relevant commercial management agreements. These revenues are eliminated in the
consolidation of our accounts.

A. Operating Results

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

We believe the principal factors that will affect our future results of operations include:
• the number of LNG carriers in our owned and managed fleets;
• the timely delivery of our ships under construction;
• our ability to maintain good working relationships with our existing customers and our ability

to increase the number of our customers through the development of new working
relationships;

• the performance of their charter obligations by subsidiaries of BG Group and Shell;
• the supply-demand relationship for LNG shipping services;
• our ability to successfully re-employ the ships we own, including our LNG carriers on order,

at economically attractive rates;

• the effective and efficient technical management of the ships under our management;
• our ability to obtain acceptable debt financing in respect of our capital commitments;
• our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approvals and to satisfy technical, health, safety

and compliance standards that meet our customers’ requirements; and

• economic, regulatory, political and governmental conditions that affect shipping and the LNG
industry, which include changes in the number of new LNG importing countries and regions,
as well as structural LNG market changes impacting LNG supply that may allow greater
flexibility and competition of other energy sources with global LNG use.

In addition to the general factors discussed above, we believe certain specific factors have

impacted, or will impact, our results of operations. These factors include:

• the hire rate earned by our owned ships;
• unscheduled off-hire days;
• the fees we receive for construction supervision and technical ship management services;
• the level of our ship operating expenses, including crewing costs, insurance and maintenance

costs;

• our access to capital required to acquire additional ships and/or to implement our business

strategy;

• our level of debt, the related interest expense and the timing of required payments of

principal;

• mark-to-market changes in interest rate swaps and foreign currency fluctuations; and
• the level of our general and administrative expenses, including salaries and costs of

consultants.

Principal Components of Revenues and Expenses

Revenues

Vessel Ownership

Our vessel ownership revenues are driven primarily by the number of LNG carriers in our
owned fleet, the amount of daily charter hire that they earn under time charters and the number of
operating days during which they generate revenues. These factors, in turn, are affected by our

50

decisions relating to ship acquisitions and disposals, the amount of time that our ships spend in
drydock undergoing repairs, maintenance and upgrade work, the age, condition and technical
specifications of our ships as well as the relative levels of supply and demand in the LNG carrier
charter market. Under the terms of some of our time charter arrangements, the operating cost
component of the daily hire rate is intended to correspond to the costs of operating the ship.
Accordingly, we will receive additional revenue under certain of our time charters through an annual
escalation of the operating cost component of the daily hire rate and, in the event of more material
increases in a ship’s operating costs, we may be entitled to receive additional revenues under those
charters. Under our other time charter arrangements, most of our operating costs are passed-through
to the charterer in the form of an adjustment to the operating cost component of the daily hire rate.
We believe these adjustment provisions provide substantial protection against significant cost
increases. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Ship Time Charters—
Hire Rate Provisions” for a more detailed discussion of the hire rate provisions of our charter
contracts.

Our LNG carriers are employed through time charter contracts. Revenues under our time
charters are recognized when services are performed, revenue is earned and the collection of the
revenue is reasonably assured. The charter hire revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the term of the relevant time charter. We do not recognize revenue during days when the ship is
off-hire. Advance payments under time charter contracts are classified as liabilities until such time as
the criteria for recognizing the revenue are met.

The table below provides additional information about our contracted charter revenues based on

contracts in effect as of December 31, 2013 for the 12 ships in our owned fleet for which we had
secured time charters, including the contracts for five of our newbuildings on order. Other than the
assumptions reflected in the footnotes below, including our assumption that the newbuildings are
delivered on schedule, the table below does not reflect events occurring after December 31, 2013
including the charter party agreements for the three ships to be acquired under the Pending Vessel
Acquisition. The table below reflects only our contracted charter revenues for the 12 ships in our
owned fleet for which we have secured time charters, and it does not reflect the costs or expenses
we will incur in fulfilling our obligations under the charters, nor does it include other revenues we
may earn, such as revenues for technical management of customer-owned ships. In particular, the
table does not reflect any time charter revenues for our two LNG carriers on order for which we
have not yet secured time charter contracts, revenues from GasLog Chelsea related to contracts
signed after December 31, 2013, contracted revenues for the three ships to be acquired under the
Pending Vessel Acquisition or any additional ships we may acquire in the future, nor does it reflect
the options under our time charters that permit our charterers to extend the time charter terms for
successive multi-year periods at comparable charter hire rates. The entry into time charter contracts
for the two remaining newbuildings on order, the GasLog Chelsea, any additional ships we may
acquire or the exercise of options extending the terms of our existing charters, would result in an
increase in the number of contracted days and the contracted revenue for our fleet in the future.
Although the contracted charter revenues are based on contracted charter hire rate provisions, they
reflect certain assumptions, including assumptions relating to future ship operating costs. We
consider the assumptions to be reasonable as of the date of this annual report, but if these
assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual time charter revenues could differ from those reflected
in the table. Furthermore, any contract is subject to various risks, including performance by the
counterparties or an early termination of the contract pursuant to its terms. If the charterers are
unable or unwilling to make charter payments to us, or if we agree to renegotiate charter terms at
the request of a charterer or if contracts are prematurely terminated for any reason, we would be
exposed to prevailing market conditions at the time, and our results of operations and financial
condition may be materially adversely affected. Please see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk
Factors”. For these reasons, the contracted charter revenue information presented below is not fact
and should not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future results, and readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on this information. Neither the Company’s independent
auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined or performed any
procedures with respect to the information presented in the table, nor have they expressed any

51

opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no
responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the information in the table.

Contracted Charter Revenues and Days from Time Charters as of December 31, 2013(8)(9)

Contracted time charter

revenues(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total contracted days(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total available days(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total unfixed days(7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of total contracted days/total
available days for the ten ships(1) . . . . . .

On and after December 31,

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018-2026

Total

(in millions of U.S. dollars, except days and percentages)

$209.44
2,755
3,106
351

$210.41 $246.93
3,141
4,697
1,556

2,768
3,867
1,099

$280.20
3,497
5,475
1,978

$1,128.60
13,756
50,126
36,370

$2,075.58
25,917
67,271
41,354

88.70% 71.58% 66.87% 63.87% 27.44% 38.53%

(1) Reflects time charter revenues and contracted days for the two LNG carriers delivered to us in 2010, the five LNG

carriers delivered to us in 2013 and the five LNG carriers on order for which we have secured time charters. Calculations
assume (i) that all the LNG carriers on order are delivered on schedule and (ii) 30 off-hire days when the ship undergoes
scheduled drydocking. Does not include revenues for the Methane Nile Eagle, in which we hold a 25% minority interest.

(2) Our ships are scheduled to undergo drydocking once every five years. Revenue calculations assume 365 revenue days per

ship per annum, with 30 off-hire days when the ship undergoes scheduled drydocking.

(3) For time charters that include a fixed operating cost component subject to annual escalation, revenue calculations include

that fixed annual escalation. No special adjustments are assumed under those time charter contracts.

(4) For time charters that give the charterer the option to set the charter hire rate at prevailing market rates during an initial
portion of the time charter’s term, revenue calculations assume that the charterer does not elect such option. Revenue
calculations for these charters include an estimate of the amount of the operating cost component and the management fee
component.

(5) Revenue calculations assume no exercise of any option to extend the terms of charters.

(6) Available days represent total calendar days after deducting 30 off-hire days when the ship undergoes scheduled

drydocking.

(7) Represents available days for the two newbuildings on order and the GasLog Chelsea for which the charter party expired

on January 15, 2014 plus available days for other ships after the expiration of existing charters (assuming charterers do not
exercise any option to extend the terms of charters). Does not reflect the short-term charter party agreements for the
GasLog Chelsea signed after December 31, 2013.

(8) Does not reflect the three ships that will be acquired under the Pending Vessel Acquisition pursuant to the agreement

signed on January 15, 2014 based on which each ship will be chartered to BG for a six-year initial terms. These contracts,
for their firm duration, will contribute additional revenue of $426.3 million and 6,483 additional contracted days from the
date of ships delivery until 2020.

(9) Does not reflect two short-term contracts of GasLog Chelsea that were signed after December 31, 2013. These contracts,

for their firm duration, will contribute additional revenue of $21.92 million and 250 additional contracted days.

Vessel Management

The revenues of GasLog LNG Services, our wholly owned subsidiary, are driven primarily by
the number of ships operating under our technical management and the amount of the fees we earn
for each of these ships as well as the amount of fees that we earn for plan approval and
construction supervision of newbuilding LNG carriers. In addition to revenues from external
customers, GasLog LNG Services receives revenues for technical management, plan approval and
construction supervision services provided to our owned fleet. These revenues are eliminated in the
consolidation of our accounts. Under the vessel management segment, we also record revenues for
commercial management services that are invoiced by GasLog Ltd. to our own fleet in accordance
with the relevant commercial management agreements. These revenues are also eliminated in the
consolidation of our accounts.

Revenue from ship management and ship construction project supervision contracts is
recognized in the statement of profit or loss when earned and when it is probable that future
economic benefits will flow to us and such benefits can be measured reliably.

52

Vessel Operating and Supervision Costs

Vessel Ownership

Vessel operating and supervision costs of our owned fleet consist of two components: voyage

expenses and ship operating expenses. Under our time charter arrangements, charterers bear
substantially all voyage expenses, including bunker fuel, port charges and canal tolls, but not
commissions, which we have historically paid to unaffiliated ship brokers based on a flat fee per
ship. Commissions are recognized as expenses on a pro rata basis over the duration of the period of
the time charter.

We are generally responsible for ship operating expenses, which include costs for crewing,
insurance, repairs, modifications and maintenance, including drydocking, lubricants, spare parts and
consumable stores and other miscellaneous expenses, as well as the associated cost of providing
these items and services. However, as described above, the hire rate provisions of our time charters
are intended to reflect the operating costs borne by us. Our charters contain provisions that
significantly reduce our exposure to increases in operating costs, including review provisions and cost
pass-through provisions. Ship operating expenses are recognized as expenses when incurred.

Our vessel ownership segment pays fees to GasLog LNG Services in connection with our own
newbuildings on order for plan approval and construction supervision services provided by GasLog
LNG Services and to cover third-party expenses incurred by GasLog LNG Services in respect of the
newbuildings. These fees, other than any inter-segment profit, are capitalized as part of the asset
value of our ships. The fees paid for technical ship management services, which are considered
expenses of the vessel ownership segment (and corresponding revenues of GasLog LNG Services),
are eliminated in the consolidation of our accounts.

Vessel Management

Vessel operating and supervision costs of GasLog LNG Services include staff costs, such as
salaries, social security and training for the technical management team and project specialists, and
project-related expenses.

Depreciation of Fixed Assets

Vessel Ownership

The majority of our consolidated depreciation expenses relate to the cost of our owned ships.

We depreciate the cost of our ships on the basis of two components: a vessel component and a
drydocking component. The vessel component is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
expected useful life of each ship, based on the cost of the ship less its estimated residual value. We
estimate the useful lives of our ships to be 35 years from the date of delivery from the shipyard.
Furthermore, we estimate the residual values of our ships to be 10% of the initial ship cost, which
represents our estimate of the market value of the ship at the end of its useful life.

We must periodically drydock each of our ships for inspection, repairs and maintenance and any

modifications to comply with industry certification or governmental requirements. All our owned
ships are required to be drydocked for these inspections at least once every five years. At the time
of delivery of a ship from the shipyard, we estimate the drydocking component of the cost of the
ship, which represents the estimated cost of the ship’s first drydocking based on our historical
experience with similar types of ships. The drydocking component of the ship’s cost is depreciated
over a five-year period.

Vessel Management

Depreciation expenses in GasLog LNG Services, our ship management company, are less
significant than the depreciation expenses in our vessel ownership segment. They relate to property
renovation costs and the costs of furniture, computer software and other equipment. Furniture,

53

software, computer equipment and other equipment are depreciated based on expected useful lives
of three to five years.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist principally of personnel costs for administrative and

support staff, board of directors fees, expense recognized in connection with equity-settled
compensation, rent, utilities, travel expenses, legal expenses, training for crew familiarization and
other advisor costs.

Financial Costs

We incur interest expense on the outstanding indebtedness under our existing credit facilities
and our swap arrangements that qualify for treatment as cash flow hedges for financial reporting
purposes, which we include in our financial costs. Financial costs also include amortization of other
loan issuance costs incurred in connection with establishing our existing credit facilities. We will
incur additional interest expense and other borrowing costs in the future on our outstanding
borrowings and under the undrawn or future borrowings. For a description of our credit facilities,
including our loan agreements, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities”.

Interest expense and the amortization of loan issuance costs that relate directly to a specific
loan to finance an LNG carrier under construction and are incurred during the construction period
are capitalized as part of the cost of the ship. Otherwise, interest expense and amortization of loan
issuance costs are expensed as incurred.

Financial Income

Financial income consists of interest income, which will depend on the level of our cash

deposits, investments and prevailing interest rates. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis.

Gain/(Loss) on Swaps

Any gain or loss derived from the fair value of the swaps at their inception, the ineffective
portion of changes in the fair value of the swaps that cannot be recognized in other comprehensive
income and net interest settled, the movement in the fair value of the swaps that have not been
designated as hedges and the amortization of the cumulative unrealized loss for the swaps that
hedge accounting was discontinued are presented as gain or loss on swaps in our consolidated
statements of profit or loss.

Share of Profit of Associate

The share of profit of associate consists of our share of profits from our 25% ownership interest

in Egypt LNG, a Bermuda exempted company whose principal asset is the LNG carrier Methane
Nile Eagle. Our share of the profits or losses arising out of our interest in Egypt LNG is reported in
our vessel ownership segment.

54

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012

Year ended December 31, 2013

Vessel
Ownership

Vessel

Management Unallocated(1)

Eliminations

Total

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

Statement of profit or loss by segment
Revenues from external customers . . . . . .
Inter-segment revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Vessel operating and supervision costs . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative expenses . . . .
Profit/(loss) from operations . . . . . . . . . . . .

Financial costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit/(loss) for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$145,409
—
145,409

(32,418)
(28,822)
(2,172)
81,997

(24,339)
73
11,498
1,470
$ 70,699

$11,831
9,233
21,064

(8,390)
(338)
(7,730)
4,604

(48)
—
—
—
$ 4,557

$

—
—
—

$ — $157,240
—
157,240

(9,233)
(9,233)

—
(162)
(13,064)
(13,226)

(3,464)
337
—
—
$(16,353)

5,889
—
1,370
(1,974)

—
—
—
—
$(1,974)

(34,919)
(29,322)
(21,597)
71,402

(27,851)
411
11,498
1,470
$ 56,929

(1) Unallocated items consist of expenses of GasLog Ltd. related to administrative functions and compensation paid to senior

management.

Year ended December 31, 2012(1)

Vessel
Ownership

Vessel

Management Unallocated(2)

Eliminations

Total

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

Statement of profit or loss by segment
Revenues from external customers . . . . . .
Inter-segment revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 56,281
—

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56,281

Vessel operating and supervision costs . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative expenses . . . .

(10,778)
(12,617)
(146)

Profit/(loss) from operations. . . . . . . . . . . . .

32,740

Financial costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(11,593)
136
(6,783)
1,078

$12,261
4,833

17,094

(7,769)
(313)
(7,755)

1,257

(55)
—
—
—

$

—
—

—

$ — $ 68,542
—

(4,833)

(4,833)

68,542

—
(135)
(12,480)

(12,614)

(21)
1,038
—
—

3,901
—
—

(14,646)
(13,065)
(20,380)

(932)

20,451

—
—
—
—

(11,670)
1,174
(6,783)
1,078

Profit/(loss) for the year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 15,578

$ 1,202

$(11,598)

$ (932)

$ 4,250

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits adopted on January

1, 2013 (Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements).

(2) Unallocated items consist of expenses of GasLog Ltd. related to administrative functions and compensation paid to senior

management.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we had an average of 5.0 ships operating in our
owned fleet, an average of 16.9 ships operating under our technical management (including our 5.0
owned ships) and an average of 4.2 owned ships under construction supervision. During the year
ended December 31, 2012, we had an average of 2.0 ships operating in our owned fleet, an average
of 14.0 ships operating under our technical management (including our 2.0 owned ships) and an
average of 4.6 owned ships under construction supervision.

55

Revenues:

Consolidated revenues increased by 129.41%, or $88.70 million, to $157.24 million during the

year ended December 31, 2013, from $68.54 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. The
increase is attributable to an increase in revenues in the vessel ownership segment of $89.13 million,
partially offset by a decrease in revenues in the vessel management segment from external customers
of $0.43 million.

Vessel ownership segment: In our vessel ownership segment, revenues increased by 158.37%, or

$89.13 million, to $145.41 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $56.28 million
during the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase is due to the delivery of the GasLog
Shanghai, the GasLog Santiago, the GasLog Sydney, the GasLog Skagen, the GasLog Chelsea, and
the GasLog Seattle on January 28, 2013, March 25, 2013, May 30, 2013, July 25, 2013, October 4,
2103 and December 9, 2013, respectively and the commencement of their charter party agreements.

Vessel management segment: Revenues of GasLog LNG Services increased by 23.23%, or $3.97
million, to $21.06 million, from $17.09 million, of which $11.83 million and $12.26 million was from
external customers, during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase
of $4.40 million in inter-segment revenues is mainly attributable to a $2.28 million increase in
management fees and other services provided to the GasLog Shanghai, the GasLog Santiago, the
GasLog Sydney, the GasLog Skagen, the GasLog Chelsea, and the GasLog Seattle, $1.37 million
from the commercial management fees in accordance with the commercial management agreements
signed in 2013 and $0.78 million increase in revenues from newbuilding supervision. Revenues from
newbuilding supervision, management fees and other services provided to our vessel ownership
segment are eliminated in the consolidation of Group revenues. The newbuilding supervision
program will be effective until all of our Group newbuildings are delivered. The decrease in revenue
from external customers of $0.43 million is attributable to a decrease in the performance bonus we
received from BG Group for the management of its ships of $0.25 million and a decrease of $0.18
million in revenues earned from all other services provided to external customers.

Vessel Operating and Supervision Costs:

Consolidated vessel operating and supervision costs increased by 138.36%, or $20.27 million, to
$34.92 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $14.65 million during the year ended
December 31, 2012. The increase is mainly attributable to an increase of $21.64 million in vessel
operating expenses in the vessel ownership segment.

Vessel ownership segment: Vessel operating costs in the segment increased by 200.74% or $21.64

million, to $32.42 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $10.78 million during the
year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to operating expenses of the six vessels delivered in
2013 and increased technical maintenance expenses due to the planned underwater inspections and
maintenance of the main engines for the two vessels delivered in 2010.

Vessel management segment: Vessel operating and supervision costs of GasLog LNG Services
increased by 7.98%, or $0.62 million, to $8.39 million during the year ended December 31, 2013,
from $7.77 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, due to new employees hired in order
to fulfill new requirements from our existing customers.

General and Administrative Expenses:

Consolidated general and administrative expenses increased by 5.99%, or $1.22 million, to
$21.60 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $20.38 million during the year ended
December 31, 2012. The increase is mainly attributable to an increase of $2.02 million in vessel
ownership segment, an increase of $0.58 million in unallocated segment, partially offset by a
decrease of $0.03 million in vessel management.

Vessel ownership segment: General and administrative expenses in the segment increased by
$2.02 million, to $2.17 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $0.15 million during
the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in general and administrative expenses is mainly

56

attributable to the six vessels delivered in 2013 and the commercial management fee of $1.37 million
that is eliminated on a Group basis.

Vessel management segment: General and administrative expenses in the segment decreased
slightly by 0.39%, or $0.03 million, to $7.73 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from
$7.76 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Unallocated: Unallocated general and administrative expenses increased by 4.65%, or $0.58
million, to $13.06 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $12.48 million during the
year ended December 31, 2012. The increase is mainly attributable to an increase of $1.78 million in
personnel costs due to an increase in the number of employees and an increase in other personnel-
related expenses related to the planned growth, an increase of $0.88 million in legal and professional
services, partially offset by a decrease of $1.87 million in equity-settled compensation expense
attributable to the segment because the old plan fully vested upon completion of our IPO in April
2012 while the amortization for the 2013 plan started on April 29, 2013 and a decrease of $0.21
million in all other expenses.

Financial Costs:

Consolidated financial costs increased by 138.65%, or $16.18 million, to $27.85 million during

the year ended December 31, 2013, from $11.67 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.
The increase is mainly attributable to an increase of $12.75 million in the vessel ownership segment
and an increase of $3.44 million in the unallocated segment.

Vessel ownership segment: Financial costs in the segment increased by 110.01%, or $12.75
million, to $24.34 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $11.59 million during the
year ended December 31, 2012, as a result of the interest expense on outstanding indebtedness.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we had an average of $673.29 million of outstanding
indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of 2.99% and during the year ended December
31, 2012, we had an average of $269.10 million of outstanding indebtedness with a weighted average
interest rate of 3.94%. The weighted average interest does not include the interest for swaps that do
not qualify for hedge accounting since the interest for such swaps is classified under Gain/(loss) on
swaps.

Unallocated: Financial costs in the segment increased by $3.44 million, to $3.46 million for the

year ended December 31, 2013, from $0.02 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The
increase is mainly related to the interest expense for the bond issued on June 27, 2013.

Financial Income:

Consolidated financial income decreased by 64.96%, or $0.76 million to $0.41 million for the

year ended December 31, 2013, from $1.17 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. The
decrease is mainly attributable to decreased interest income from our decreased average fixed time
deposits.

Gain/(loss)on Swaps:

Consolidated gain on swaps increased by $18.28 million to $11.50 million during the year ended
December 31, 2013, from $6.78 million loss during the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase
is attributable to the vessel ownership segment.

Vessel ownership segment: In our vessel ownership segment, gain on swaps increased by $18.28
million to $11.50 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $6.78 million loss during
the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase is attributable to an increase of $24.01 million in
unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, partially offset by the $5.73 million realized loss on interest
rate held for trading. Unrealized gain on swaps, net increased by 354.13% or $24.01 million, to
$17.23 million gain during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $6.78 million loss during the
year ended December 31, 2012. The increase is mainly attributable to a $24.45 million increase in
gain from the mark-to-market valuation of our interest rate swaps which are carried at fair value

57

through profit or loss at inception and our interest rate swaps for which hedge accounting was
discontinued during 2013, a decrease of $1.74 million in loss recognized at inception of the interest
swaps, partially offset by a $2.29 million that was reclassified from equity to the profit or loss
statement related to the interest rate swaps for which hedge accounting was discontinued.

Share of Profit of Associate:

Our consolidated share of profits from our interest in Egypt LNG increased by 36.11%, or $0.39

million, to $1.47 million during the year ended December 31, 2013, from $1.08 million during the
year ended December 31, 2012, mainly because of the scheduled drydocking in 2012, which resulted
in lower revenues associated with the off-hire days and increased repairs and maintenance normally
undertaken during the drydocking period.

Profit for the Year:

Consolidated profit increased by $52.68 million, to $56.93 million for the year ended December

31, 2013, from $4.25 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the aforementioned
factors.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

Statement of profit or loss by segment
Revenues from external customers . . . . . .
Inter-segment revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Vessel operating and supervision costs . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative expenses . . . .
Profit/(loss) from operations. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Financial costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year ended December 31, 2012(1)

Vessel
Ownership

Vessel

Management Unallocated(2)

Eliminations

Total

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

$ 56,281
—
56,281

(10,778)
(12,617)
(146)
32,740

(11,593)
136
(6,783)
1,078

$12,261
4,833
17,094

(7,769)
(313)
(7,755)
1,257

(55)
—
—
—

$

—
—
—

$ — $ 68,542
—
68,542

(4,833)
(4,833)

—
(135)
(12,480)
(12,614)

(21)
1,038
—
—

3,901
—
—
(932)

—
—
—
—

(14,646)
(13,065)
(20,380)
20,451

(11,670)
1,174
(6,783)
1,078

Profit/(loss) for the year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 15,578

$ 1,202

$(11,598)

$ (932)

$ 4,250

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits adopted on January

1, 2013 (Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements).

(2) Unallocated items consist of expenses of GasLog Ltd. related to administrative functions and compensation paid to senior

management.

58

Year ended December 31, 2011

Vessel
Ownership

Vessel

Management Unallocated(1)

Eliminations

Total

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)

Statement of profit or loss by segment
Revenues from external customers . . . . . .
Inter-segment revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vessel operating and supervision costs . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative expenses . . . .

Profit/(loss) from operations. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . .
Profit/(loss) for the year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 55,756
—

55,756
(10,100)
(12,612)
(1,142)

31,903
(9,573)
34
(2,725)
1,312
—
$ 20,950

$10,714
2,578

13,292
(4,693)
(149)
(6,050)

2,401
(47)
8
—
—
—
$ 2,363

$ —
—

—
—
(66)
(9,610)

(9,676)
(12)
—
—
—
25
$(9,663)

$ — $ 66,471
—

(2,578)

(2,578)
1,846
—
805

73
—
—
—
—
—
73

$

66,471
(12,946)
(12,827)
(15,997)

24,701
(9,631)
42
(2,725)
1,312
25
$ 13,723

(1) Unallocated items consist of expenses of GasLog Ltd. related to administrative functions and compensation paid to senior

management.

During each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had an average of 2.0 ships

operating in our owned fleet and an average of 14.0 ships under our technical management. During
the year ended December 31, 2012, we had an average of 4.6 ships under construction supervision,
as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, when we had an average of 0.7 ships under
construction supervision.

Revenues:

Consolidated revenues increased by 3.11%, or $2.07 million, to $68.54 million during the year

ended December 31, 2012, from $66.47 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The
increase is attributable to an increase in revenues in the vessel management segment from external
customers of $1.55 million and an increase in revenues in the vessel ownership segment of $0.52
million.

Vessel ownership segment: In our vessel ownership segment, revenues increased by 0.93%, or

$0.52 million, to $56.28 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $55.76 million
during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is due to the extension of the charter party
agreements for the two owned ships in May 2011, which increased the amount of revenue recorded
on a straight-line basis. In addition there were two more operating days in 2012.

Vessel management segment: Revenues of GasLog LNG Services increased by 28.59%, or $3.80
million, to $17.09 million, from $13.29 million, of which $12.26 million and $10.71 million was from
external customers, during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. This increase
in revenue from external customers of $1.55 million is attributable to increased professional services
and additional assignments, partially offset by a decrease in the performance bonus we received
from BG Group for the management of its ships. The increase of $2.25 million in inter-segment
revenues is mainly attributable to an increase of $2.99 million in revenue from newbuilding
supervision, an increase of $0.09 million in revenue from predelivery management fees for the first
two vessels that will be delivered in 2013, partially offset by a decrease of $0.80 million in
consultancy services fees charged to the vessel ownership segment since the consultancy services
were terminated in June 2011. Revenues from newbuilding supervision, predelivery management fees
and consultancy services are eliminated on a Group basis. The newbuilding program will be effective
until 2016 when all of our Group newbuildings will be delivered.

59

Vessel Operating and Supervision Costs:

Consolidated vessel operating and supervision costs increased by 13.13%, or $1.70 million, to
$14.65 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $12.95 million during the year ended
December 31, 2011. The increase is mainly attributable to an increase of $0.78 million in employee
costs related to new employees hired to fulfill new requirements from our existing customers and an
increase of $0.68 million in the vessel ownership segment.

Vessel ownership segment: Vessel operating costs in the segment increased by 6.73%, or $0.68

million, to $10.78 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $10.10 million during the
year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to increased technical maintenance and crew expenses.

Vessel management segment: Vessel operating and supervision costs of GasLog LNG Services
increased by 65.67%, or $3.08 million, to $7.77 million during the year ended December 31, 2012,
from $4.69 million during the year ended December 31, 2011, due to new employees hired in order
to fulfill new requirements from our existing customers and due to an increase in the number of the
owned ships under construction supervision, which amounts are eliminated in consolidation.

General and Administrative Expenses:

Consolidated general and administrative expenses increased by 27.38%, or $4.38 million, to
$20.38 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $16.00 million during the year ended
December 31, 2011. The increase is mainly attributable to an increase of $2.87 million in unallocated
segment and an increase of $1.70 million in vessel management, partially offset by a decrease of
$0.99 million in vessel ownership segment.

Vessel ownership segment: General and administrative expenses in the segment decreased by
86.84%, or $0.99 million, to $0.15 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $1.14
million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The $1.14 million in general and administrative
expenses allocated to the vessel ownership segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 included
$0.80 million of fees paid by the vessel ownership segment to the vessel management segment in
connection with consultancy services relating to newbuildings under construction during 2011. These
consultancy fees were recorded as revenue of the vessel management segment and eliminated on
consolidation. The consultancy services agreement was terminated in June 2011. The decrease in
general and administrative expenses of $0.99 million derives mainly from the aforementioned
decrease in consultancy service fees and a decrease of $0.17 million in legal fees due to the
registration expenses for the vessel-owning companies in 2011.

Vessel management segment: General and administrative expenses in the segment increased by

28.26%, or $1.71 million, to $7.76 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $6.05
million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in general and administrative
expenses is attributable to an increase of $1.30 million in training and familiarization costs for the
seamen that will join the newbuildings upon delivery, an increase of $0.16 million in legal and
professional fees, an increase of $0.10 million in office expenses and an increase of $0.15 million in
other general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to
the year ended December 31, 2011.

Unallocated: Unallocated general and administrative expenses increased by 29.86%, or $2.87

million, to $12.48 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $9.61 million during the
year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is mainly attributable to (a) an increase of $1.38
million in personnel costs due to an increase in the number of employees and an increase in other
personnel-related expenses related to the planned growth and the reporting and compliance
requirements of being a public company, (b) an increase of $0.29 million in directors’ fees, (c) an
increase of $1.06 million in travel expenses, (d) an increase of $1.05 million in legal and professional
fees, (e) an increase of $0.75 million in managers liability insurance. This increase in unallocated
general and administrative expenses was partially offset by a $0.82 million decrease in equity-settled
compensation expense, a decrease of $0.60 million in foreign exchange losses and a decrease of $0.24
million in other unallocated expenses.

60

Financial Costs:

Consolidated financial costs increased by 21.18%, or $2.04 million, to $11.67 million during the
year ended December 31, 2012, from $9.63 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The
increase is mainly attributable to the vessel ownership segment.

Vessel ownership segment: Financial costs in the segment increased by 21.11%, or $2.02 million,

to $11.59 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $9.57 million during the year
ended December 31, 2011, as a result of the interest expense on outstanding indebtedness used to
finance the purchase of the GasLog Savannah and the GasLog Singapore. During the year ended
December 31, 2012, we had an average of $269.10 million of outstanding indebtedness with a
weighted average interest rate of 3.94% and during the year ended December 31, 2011, we had an
average of $296.70 million of outstanding indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of
2.92%. The increase in average interest rate is due to the Group entering into an additional fixed
interest rate swap agreement related to the GAS-one Ltd. facility in October 2011.

Financial Income:

Consolidated financial income increased by $1.13 million to $1.17 million for the year ended
December 31, 2012, from $0.04 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is
mainly attributable to increased interest income from fixed time deposits due to the increase in cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments following our IPO.

Loss on Swaps:

Consolidated loss on interest rate swaps, net increased by $4.05 million to $6.78 million during

the year ended December 31, 2012, from $2.73 million during the year ended December 31, 2011.
The increase is attributable to the vessel ownership segment.

Vessel ownership segment: In our vessel ownership segment, loss on interest rate swaps increased

by $4.05 million to $6.78 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $2.73 million
during the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is attributable to a $4.62 million loss from
the mark-to-market valuation of six interest rate swaps signed in 2012 and carried at fair value
through profit and loss, partially offset by the decrease of $0.17 million in loss relating to the
ineffective portion of the changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow
hedging instruments and a $0.40 million decrease in loss recognized at the inception of the interest
swaps signed in 2012 and designated as cash flow hedging instruments.

Share of Profit of Associate:

Our consolidated share of profits from our interest in Egypt LNG decreased by 17.56%, or
$0.23 million, to $1.08 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, from $1.31 million during
the year ended December 31, 2011, mainly because of the scheduled drydocking in 2012, which
resulted in lower revenues associated with the off-hire days and increased repairs and maintenance
normally undertaken during the drydocking period.

Profit for the Year:

Consolidated profit decreased by 69.02%, or $9.47 million, to $4.25 million for the year ended

December 31, 2012, from $13.72 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as a result of the
aforementioned factors.

Customers

Historically, we have derived nearly all of our revenues from one customer, BG Group. For the

year ended December 31, 2013, we received 90.7% of our revenues from BG Group, 0.5% of our
revenues from Egypt LNG, an entity in which we have a 25% ownership interest, 1.3% of our
revenues from Shell, 6.9% of our revenues from various charterers in the spot market and 0.6%

61

from another customer. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we received 97.4% of our revenues
from BG Group, 1.2% of our revenues from Egypt LNG and 1.4% from another customer.

Seasonality

Since our owned ships are mainly employed under multi-year, fixed-rate charter arrangements,

seasonal trends do not impact the revenues earned by our vessel ownership segment during the year.
In the future, seasonality may impact the revenues of our ships operating under spot or seasonal
charter arrangements. Seasonality also does not have a significant impact on revenues earned by our
vessel management segment, as we provide technical ship management and ship construction
supervision services under fixed-rate agreements.

Additionally, our business is not subject to seasonal borrowing requirements.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2013, GasLog has financed its capital requirements with contributions from

its shareholders, proceeds from our IPO, operating cash flows and long-term bank borrowings. Our
primary short-term liquidity needs are to fund our ship operating expenses, finance the purchase and
construction of our newbuildings and secondhand ships and service our existing debt. Our long-term
liquidity needs primarily relate to debt repayment and scheduled installment payments to the
shipyard in respect of newbuilds due to be delivered. In monitoring our working capital needs, we
project our charter hire income and ships’ maintenance and running expenses, as well as debt service
obligations, and seek to maintain adequate cash reserves in order to address any budget overruns.

We anticipate that our primary sources of funds will be available cash, cash from operations and

borrowings under our loan agreements, along with any borrowings under new credit facilities or
proceeds of equity financings that we may pursue from time to time. We believe that these sources
of funds will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs, although there can be no assurance that we
will be able to obtain future financing on terms acceptable to us.

On January 22, 2014, we completed a follow-on public equity offering of 10,925,000 common

shares and a concurrent private placement of 2,317,460 common shares at a price of $15.75 per
share. The net proceeds from the public offering and the private placement, after deducting
underwriting discounts and other offering expenses, were approximately $199.4 million. As of March
26, 2014, we had available $350.4 million under a Form F-3 shelf registration statement for future
issuances of securities in the public market.

Our funding and treasury activities are intended to maximize investment returns while

maintaining appropriate liquidity. Cash and cash equivalents are held primarily in U.S. dollars with
approximately 8% held in euros as of December 31, 2013. On June 21, 2013, we entered into three
CCSs to exchange interest payments and principal on maturity on the same terms as the Bond
Agreement and designated the CCSs as hedges of the variability of the USD functional currency
equivalent cash flows on the bond. Refer to Note 21 to our audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this annual report for details on our swap arrangements.

In 2012, the Company adopted what it considers to be conservative risk management policies to

be used as a guideline in managing risks arising from our business and treasury activities. The
Treasury Policies and Procedures aim to ensure that: responsibilities for treasury activities are
delegated appropriately; treasury risks are identified, quantified and actively managed in a timely
manner; and treasury transactions are properly authorized, controlled, reported and monitored.

In addition, during 2012 the Company established a set of Counterparty Risk Policies and

Procedures formalizing our counterparty credit risk management process with an aim to protect
against unwarranted credit exposures and to seek to manage counterparty risk. The purpose of the
Counterparty Risk Policies and Procedures is to: provide general principles to guide counterparty
credit risk management process; identify and actively manage counterparty risks; and delegate
authority to approve additional counterparty risk on the Company.

62

As of December 31, 2013, we had $103.80 million of cash and cash equivalents, of which $3.09

million was held in a retention account in connection with the next installment and interest payment
due under the credit facilities entered into by our subsidiaries GAS-two Ltd. and GAS-three Ltd.,
$28.78 million was held in time deposits and $8.15 million was held in ship management client
accounts. Moreover, as of December 31, 2013, we had $4.50 million held in time deposits with an
initial duration of more than three months but less than a year that have been classified as short-
term investments. The funds in the ship management client accounts were held on behalf of
customers of our vessel management segment to cover operating expenses of customer-owned ships
operating under our management.

As of December 31, 2013, we had an aggregate of $1.06 billion of indebtedness outstanding

under six credit agreements, of which $104.75 million is repayable within one year, which includes
$39.49 million under the revolving credit facility, and we had $82.23 million outstanding under our
bond that is payable in June 2018.

As of December 31, 2013 there is an undrawn amount of $10.51 million from the revolving
facility of GAS-two Ltd. from which $2.68 million was drawn in January 2014 and the balance is
available to be drawn under certain conditions. In addition, there is one loan facility with an
aggregate undrawn amount of $435 million available that will be used to finance a portion of the
contract prices of three of our newbuildings up on their deliveries. For more details, see “—Capital
Expenditures”.

The total contract price for our seven newbuildings on order as of December 31, 2013, was
approximately $1.39 billion, of which $119.17 million was paid as of December 31, 2013. The balance
is payable under each shipbuilding contract in installments upon the attainment of certain specified
milestones, with the largest portion of the purchase price for each ship coming due upon its delivery.
We are scheduled to take delivery of the seven newbuildings on various dates in 2014, 2015 and
2016. As noted above, as of December 31, 2013, we had one unused loan facility available to us
aggregating $435 million to finance a portion of the contract prices for three newbuildings. The
balance of the total contract price will be funded by available cash, cash from operations and new
financings. We also have options to acquire up to six additional newbuilding LNG carriers that
expire in the end of the first quarter of 2014. In the event we decide to exercise these options, we
expect to finance the costs with cash from operations and a combination of debt and equity
financing.

As our fleet expands, we will evaluate changes to the quarterly dividend consistent with our

cash flow and liquidity position. Our policy is to pay dividends in amounts that will allow us to
retain sufficient liquidity to fund our obligations as well as execute our business plan going forward.
Our board of directors will determine the timing and amount of all dividend payments, based on
various factors, including our earnings, financial condition, cash requirements and availability,
restrictions in our credit facilities and the provisions of Bermuda law. Accordingly, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to pay quarterly dividends. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk
Factors” and “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Financial Statements and Other
Financial Information—Dividend Policy” for a discussion of risks related to our ability to pay
dividends.

Working Capital Position

Taking into account generally expected market conditions, we anticipate that cash flow
generated from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations, including our working capital
requirements, and to make the required principal and interest payments on our indebtedness during
the next 12 months.

As of December 31, 2013, our current assets totaled $126.23 million while current liabilities
totaled $158.83 million, resulting in a negative working capital position of $32.6 million. Current
liabilities include an amount of $39.49 million being the outstanding revolving facility (refer to
Credit Facilities below) that will be extended to future periods on its due date.

63

Cash Flows

Year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012

The following table summarizes our net cash flows from operating, investing and financing

activities for the periods indicated:

Year ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands of
U.S. dollars)

Net cash from operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash from financing activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 86,745
(935,516)
840,481

$ 24,918
(212,621)
278,811

The net cash movements during the year ended December 31, 2013, differ significantly from
those of the year ended December 31, 2012, in line with the Company’s growth and fleet expansion.

Net Cash From Operating Activities

Net cash from operating activities increased by $61.83 million, to $86.75 million in the year
ended December 31, 2013, from $24.92 million during the year ended December 31, 2012. The
increase was due to an increase of $93.78 million in revenue collections, favorable changes in cash
from ship management creditors amounting to $7.55 million and a decrease of $4.71 million in
security collaterals, partially offset by an increase of $28.04 million in payments for general and
administrative expenses, operating expenses and inventories, an increase of $10.45 million in cash
paid for interest and $5.73 million in realized losses on interest rate swaps held for trading.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $722.90 million, to $935.52 million in the year
ended December 31, 2013, from $212.62 million in the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase
is mainly attributable to a $928.46 million increase in payments for the construction costs of
newbuildings and the acquisition of the second hand vessel, a decrease of $0.46 million in interest
income received partially offset by a $1.08 million decrease in payments for other tangible assets, the
net decrease in short-term investments of $203.90 million, an increase of $0.69 million of dividends
we received from Egypt LNG and $0.36 million we received from Egypt LNG as a return of capital.

Net Cash From Financing Activities

Net cash from financing activities increased by $561.67 million, to $840.48 million in the year
ended December 31, 2013, from $278.81 million in the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase
is mainly attributable to $1,026.20 million drawn from our bank loan facilities and the bond (2012:
nil) and a decrease of $1.44 million in payment of loan issuance costs, partially offset by an increase
of $21.37 million in dividend payments and an increase of $115.19 million in bank loan repayments.
The cash from financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2012 was further affected by the
net IPO proceeds of $310.74 million and the capital contributions received from our pre-IPO
shareholders of $18.66 million (2013: nil).

Year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011

The following table summarizes our net cash flows from operating, investing and financing

activities for the periods indicated:

64

Year ended
December 31,

2011

2012
(in thousands of
U.S. dollars)

Net cash from operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash from financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 24,918
(212,621)
278,811

$ 27,001
(86,464)
56,286

Net Cash From Operating Activities

Net cash from operating activities decreased by 7.70%, or $2.08 million, to $24.92 million in the

year ended December 31, 2012, from $27.00 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. The
decrease was due to an increase of $2.54 million in cash paid for interest, an increase of $6.20
million in payments for general and administrative expenses, operating expenses and inventories, and
an increase of $2.36 million in security collaterals, which items were partially offset by an increase of
$3.49 million in revenue collections and favorable changes in cash from ship management creditors
amounting to $5.53 million.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $126.16 million to $212.62 million in the year
ended December 31, 2012, from $86.46 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase
was mainly attributable to $103.82 million placed in time deposits with initial durations of more than
three months but less than a year, a $22.40 million increase in payments for the construction costs of
newbuildings and a $0.33 million increase in payments for other tangible assets, a $0.50 million
decrease in return of capital we received from Egypt LNG and also a decrease of $0.14 million of
dividends we received from Egypt LNG, partially offset by an increase of $0.98 million in interest
income received.

Net Cash From Financing Activities

Net cash from financing activities increased by $222.52 million to $278.81 million in the year

ended December 31, 2012, from $56.29 million in the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase
was mainly attributable to the proceeds from the completion of our IPO of $314.26 million and a
$2.43 million decrease in scheduled bank loan repayments, partially offset by a $6.14 million increase
in dividends paid, a $74.31 million decrease in capital contributions that we received from our pre-
IPO shareholders, a $11.46 million increase in payments of loan issuance costs and a $2.24 million
increase in payments of IPO costs.

Credit Facilities

The following summarizes certain terms of the six facilities as outstanding facilities as of

December 31, 2013:

Lender(s)

Danish Ship
Finance A/S

Subsidiary Party
(Collateral Ship)

GAS-one Ltd.
(GasLog Savannah)

Outstanding
Principal
Amount

$136.15 million

Interest Rate

Maturity

LIBOR +
applicable margin

2020

Remaining Payment
Installments as of
December 31, 2013

26 consecutive quarterly
installments in the amount
of $2.06 million each, plus a
balloon payment in the
amount of $82.52 million
due in May 2020

65

Subsidiary Party
(Collateral Ship)

Outstanding
Principal
Amount

Interest Rate

Maturity

GAS-two Ltd.
(GasLog Singapore)

Term loan:
$105.00 million

LIBOR +
applicable margin

2018

Revolving
facility: $39.49
million

Lender(s)

DNB Bank
ASA, UBS AG,
National Bank of
Greece S.A.,
Commonwealth
Bank of
Australia and
Skandinaviska
Ensklida Banken
AB (publ)

DNB Bank
ASA, London
Branch, and the
Export-Import
Bank of Korea

GAS-three Ltd.
(GasLog Shanghai)
and GAS-four Ltd.
(GasLog Santiago)

$260.47 million

LIBOR +
applicable margin

2025

GAS-five Ltd.
(GasLog Sydney)
and GAS-six Ltd.
(GasLog Skagen)

$270.89 million

LIBOR +
applicable margin

2019

Nordea Bank
Finland Plc,
London Branch,
ABN AMRO
Bank N.V. and
Citibank
International
Plc., Greece
Branch

Credit Suisse AG GAS-seven Ltd.
(GasLog Seattle)

$144.00 million

LIBOR +
applicable margin

2020

GAS-fifteen Ltd.
(GasLog Chelsea)

$100.00 million

LIBOR +
applicable margin

2018

Citibank N.A.,
London Branch,
Citibank
International Plc.
and DVB
America N.V.

Remaining Payment
Installments as of
December 31, 2013

Term loan: 18 consecutive
quarterly installments in the
amount of $2.50 million
each, plus a balloon payment
in the amount of $60.00
million due in May 2018

Revolving facility: It is
available for drawing on a
fully revolving basis in
minimum amounts of
$5,000,000 until three
months prior to the maturity
date in May 2018. Total
revolving facility of $50.00
million

45 consecutive quarterly
installments of $2.01 million
under each tranche, with two
balloon payments of up to
$40 million each due under
each tranche 12 years from
delivery of the collateral
ships; the lenders will have
an option giving them the
right to request full
repayment in 2018

22 and 23 consecutive
quarterly installments of
$2.04 million under each
tranche with two balloon
payments of $89.62 million
each due under each tranche
concurrently with the last
installments in 2019

28 consecutive quarterly
installments of $2 million,
with a balloon payment of
$88 million due with the last
installment in 2020

10 semi-annual installments
of $3.34 million, with a
balloon payment of $66.65
million due with the last
installment in 2018

66

In addition, through our subsidiaries, we have entered into one loan agreement in connection
with the financing of a portion of the contract prices of three contracted newbuildings. Borrowings
under this facility will be drawn upon delivery of the ships, which is scheduled for various dates
between 2014 and 2015, and will be secured by mortgages on the relevant ships. The following
summarizes certain terms of the facilities as of December 31, 2013:

Subsidiary Party
(Collateral Ship)

Committed
Amount

Up to $435
million

GAS-eight Ltd.,
GAS-nine Ltd.
and GAS-ten Ltd.
(Hull Numbers
2042, 2043 and
2044)

Expected
Drawdown
Date(s)

Q2 2014,
Q4 2014
and Q1
2015

Interest
Rate

LIBOR +
applicable
margin

Maturity

2021 (first
tranche)
and 2022
(second
and third
tranches)

Lender(s)

DnB Bank ASA,
Commonwealth
Bank of
Australia, Danish
Ship Finance
A/S, ING Bank
N.V. and
Skandinaviska
Enskilda Banken
AB (publ)

Payment
Installments Schedule

28 consecutive quarterly
installments of $1.99
million, $2.03 million and
$2.03 million,
respectively, under each
tranche, with balloon
payments of $87.28
million, $89.16 million
and $89.16 million,
respectively, due with the
last installment under
each tranche

In January 2014, in connection with the acquisition of the three ships under the Pending Vessel
Acquisition, GasLog obtained a commitment from Citibank for $325.5 million of debt financing with
a two year maturity.

Our credit facilities are secured as follows:
• first priority mortgages over the ships owned by the respective borrowers;
• guarantees from us and our subsidiary GasLog Carriers Ltd.;
• for certain of our facilities, a pledge or a negative pledge of the share capital of the

respective borrower; and

• for certain of our facilities, a first priority assignment of all earnings and insurances related to

the ship owned by the respective borrower.

Our business is not subject to seasonal borrowing requirements.

Covenants and Events of Default

Our credit facilities impose certain operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions

generally limit our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:

• incur additional indebtedness, create liens or provide guarantees;
• provide any form of credit or financial assistance to, or enter into any non-arms’ length

transactions with, us or any of our affiliates;

• sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including our ships;
• engage in merger transactions;
• enter into, terminate or amend any charter;
• amend our shipbuilding contracts;
• change the manager of our ships;
• undergo a change in ownership; or
• acquire assets, make investments or enter into any joint venture arrangements outside of the

ordinary course of business.

Our credit facilities also impose specified financial covenants that apply to us and our

subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. These financial covenants include the following:

• our net working capital (excluding the current portion of long-term debt) must be positive;
• our total indebtedness divided by our total capitalization must not exceed 75%;

67

• beginning December 31, 2013, the ratio of EBITDA over our debt service obligations

(including interest and debt repayments) on a trailing 12 months’ basis must be no less than
110%;

• beginning December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of all unencumbered cash and cash

equivalents must exceed the higher of 3% of our total indebtedness or $20 million after the
first drawdown;

• we are permitted to pay dividends, provided that we hold unencumbered cash equal to at
least 4% of our total indebtedness, subject to no event of default having occurred or
occurring as a consequence of the payment of such dividends; and

• our market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $350 million.
Our credit facilities also impose certain restrictions relating to us and our other subsidiaries,

including restrictions that limit our ability to make any substantial change in the nature of our
business or to engage in transactions that would constitute a change of control, as defined in the
relevant credit facility, without repaying all of our indebtedness in full, or to allow our largest
shareholders to reduce their shareholding in us below specified thresholds.

The loan agreement we entered into in March 2012 for a $272.5 million credit facility provides

that the lenders thereunder will have an option that gives them the right to request repayment of
the facility in full on the fifth anniversary of the delivery of the GasLog Shanghai, which was
delivered in January 2013.

Certain of our credit facilities also contain vessel employment conditions, pursuant to which we
could be required in the event of a charter termination to deposit cash in an account held with the
applicable lender until we have obtained a new time charter on terms acceptable to such lender. In
addition, we are required under one of our facilities to secure charters for the ships identified by
hull numbers 2043 and 2044, on terms approved by the lenders, at least 60 days prior to the
scheduled delivery date of the applicable ship.

Our credit facilities contain customary events of default, including nonpayment of principal or

interest, breach of covenants or material inaccuracy of representations, default under other material
indebtedness and bankruptcy. In addition, each facility contains covenants requiring that the fair
market value of the ship securing the facility remains above 120% of all amounts outstanding under
the applicable facility. In the event that the value of a ship falls below the threshold, we could be
required to provide the lender with additional security or prepay a portion of the outstanding loan
balance, which could negatively impact our liquidity.

The Company is not in default under any of its credit facilities.

Senior Unsecured Notes

On June 27, 2013, we issued a NOK 500 million (or $83.21 million based on the exchange rate
on June 27, 2013) bond that will mature on June 27, 2018. The Bond bears interest at NIBOR plus
margin. Interest payments shall be made in arrears on a quarterly basis. The carrying amount of the
Bond, net of unamortized financing costs, as of December 31, 2013 is $79.78 million. We may
redeem the Bond in whole or in part as follows: (a) with settlement date at any time from June 27,
2016 to but not included June 27, 2017 at 105.00% of par plus accrued interests on redeemed
amount, (b) with settlement date at any time from June 27, 2017 to but not including December 27,
2017 at 103.00% of par plus accrued interests on redeemed amount, and (c) with settlement date at
any time from December 27, 2017 to but not including the maturity date at 101.75% of par plus
accrued interests on redeemed amount.

As issuer of the Bond we are required to comply with the financial covenants listed below:
• total indebtedness divided by total capitalization must not exceed 75%;
• beginning December 31, 2013, the ratio of EBITDA over debt service obligations (including
interest and debt repayments) on a trailing 12 months’ basis must be no less than 110%;

68

• beginning December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of all unencumbered cash and cash

equivalents must exceed the higher of 3% of total indebtedness or $20,000,000 after the first
drawdown; and

• the Group’s market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $350,000,000.
In addition we are not permitted to (i) declare or make any dividend payment or distribution,

whether in cash or in kind, (ii) repurchase any of our shares or undertake other similar transactions
(including, but not limited to total return swaps related to shares in the issuer), or (iii) grant any
loans or make other distributions or transactions constituting a transfer of value to its shareholders
(items (i), (ii) and (iii) collectively referred to as the “Distributions”) that in aggregate exceed
during any calendar year 50% of the Group’s consolidated net profit after taxes based on the
audited annual accounts for the previous financial year (any un-utilized portion of the permitted
dividend pursuant to the above may not be carried forward). Notwithstanding the above, for the
years 2013 and 2014, the issuer may make Distributions up to a maximum of 60 cents per share per
annum subject to the issuer, immediately after such distributions, maintaining consolidated free
liquidity of not less than (i) $20,000,000 and (ii) 4% of total indebtedness. Any net profit of a
Group company related to sale of assets shall in any event not form a basis for any Distributions.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For information about our exposure to market risks, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative

Disclosures About Market Risk”.

Capital Expenditures

We make capital expenditures from time to time in connection with the expansion and
operation of our owned fleet. In 2010 we took delivery of two LNG carriers and in 2013 we took
delivery of six LNG carriers and acquired a second-hand vessel. During the years ended December
31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we funded $1.04 billion, $109.35 million and $86.95 million, respectively, of
construction and delivery costs, including installment payments on newbuildings, with funds
borrowed under credit facilities and the Bond, capital contributions from our pre-IPO shareholders
and proceeds from our IPO.

As of December 31, 2013, our commitments for capital expenditures related to the seven
contracted LNG carriers on order. In 2014, we signed an agreement with MSL, an affiliate of BG
Group to purchase three LNG carriers from MSL’s fleet and to charter those ships back to MSL for
six-year initial terms. The outstanding commitment for our seven newbuildings on order and the
three ships that will be acquired from MSL as of March 26, 2014 was approximately $1.73 billion.
Amounts are payable under each shipbuilding contract in installments upon the attainment of certain
specified milestones in each ship’s construction, with the largest portion of the purchase price for
each ship coming due upon its delivery.

We intend to fund these commitments with borrowings under one loan agreement we have
entered into with an aggregate undrawn amount of $435 million as of March 26, 2014, the loan
agreement to be entered into pursuant to the commitment from Citibank for $325.5 million of debt
financing, new debt agreements, the proceeds from our IPO and the proceeds from our follow-on
equity offering and private placement. In the event we decide to exercise our options to order six
additional ships from Samsung, we expect to finance the costs with cash from operations and a
combination of debt and equity financing.

To the extent that we are unable to draw down the amounts committed under our credit

facilities, we will need to find alternative financing. If we are unable to find alternative financing, we
will not be capable of funding all of our commitments for capital expenditures relating to our
contracted newbuildings, which could adversely impact our ability to pay dividends to our
shareholders, and materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

69

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon

our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued
by the IASB. The preparation of those financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and
related disclosure at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. Critical accounting policies are those that
reflect significant judgments of uncertainties and potentially result in materially different results
under different assumptions and conditions. We have described below what we believe are our most
critical accounting policies, because they generally involve a comparatively higher degree of
judgment in their application. For a description of all our principal accounting policies, see Note 2
to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Ship Cost, Lives and Residual Value

When determining ship cost, we recognize both the installment payments paid to the shipyard
along with any directly attributable costs of bringing the ships to their working condition incurred
during the construction periods as ship costs. Directly attributable costs incurred during the ship
construction period consist of capitalized borrowing costs, commissions, on-site supervision costs,
costs for sea trials, certain spare parts and equipment, lubricants and other ship delivery expenses.
Any vendor discounts are deducted from the cost of our ships. Subsequent expenditures for
conversions and major improvements are also capitalized when the recognition criteria are met.

The ship cost component is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of

each ship, based on the cost of the ship less its estimated residual value. We estimate the useful
lives of our ships to be 35 years from the date of delivery from the shipyard, which we believe is
within industry standards and represents the most reasonable useful life for each of our ships.
Furthermore, we estimate the residual values of our ships to be 10% of the initial ship cost, which
represents our estimate of the current market value of the ships as if they were at the end of their
useful lives at the time we make such estimate. The estimated residual value of our ships may not
represent the fair market value at any one time, in part because there has historically been very
little scrapping of LNG carriers and because market prices of scrap values tend to fluctuate. We
might revise our estimate of the residual values of our ships in the future in response to changing
market conditions.

An increase in the estimated useful lives of our ships or in their residual value would have the

effect of decreasing the annual depreciation charge and extending it into later periods. A decrease in
the useful life of our ships or their residual value would have the effect of increasing the annual
depreciation charge.

When we are faced with regulations that place significant limitations on the ability of one of

our ships to trade on a worldwide basis, we adjust the ship’s useful life to end at the date such
regulations become effective.

We must periodically drydock each of our ships for inspection, repairs and any modifications.
At the time of delivery of a ship from the shipyard, we estimate the drydocking component of the
cost of the ship, representing estimated costs to be incurred during the first drydocking at the
drydock yard for a special survey and parts and supplies used in making required major repairs that
meet the recognition criteria, based on our historical experience with similar types of ships.

We use judgment when estimating the period between drydockings performed, which can result

in adjustments to the estimated amortization of the drydocking expense. If a ship is disposed of
before its next drydocking, the remaining balance of the deferred drydock is written off and forms
part of the gain or loss recognized upon disposal of ships in the period when contracted. We expect
that our ships will be required to be drydocked approximately 60 months after their delivery from
the shipyard and thereafter every 30 or 60 months our ships will be required to undergo special or
intermediate surveys and be drydocked for major repairs and maintenance that cannot be performed

70

while the ships are operating. We amortize our estimated drydocking expenses for the first special
survey over five years, but this estimate might be revised in the future.

Costs that will be capitalized as part of the future drydockings will include a variety of costs

incurred directly attributable to the drydocking and costs incurred to meet classification and
regulatory requirements, as well as expenses related to the dock preparation and port expenses at
the drydock shipyard, general shipyard expenses, expenses related to hull, external surfaces and
decks, expenses related to machinery and engines of the vessel, as well as expenses related to the
testing and correction of findings related to safety equipment on board. Drydocking costs do not
include vessel operating expenses such as replacement parts, crew expenses, provisions, lubricants
consumption, insurance, management fees or management costs during the drydocking period.
Expenses related to regular maintenance and repairs of our vessels are expensed as incurred, even if
such maintenance and repair occurs during the same time period as our drydocking.

Ordinary maintenance and repairs that do not extend the useful life of the asset are expensed

as incurred. Major renovation costs and modifications are capitalized and depreciated over the
estimated remaining useful life.

Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments

Our risk management policies permit the use of derivative financial instruments to manage
interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk. Changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments
that are not designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes are recognized in earnings.

A substantial majority of the fair value of our derivative instruments and the change in fair
value of our derivative instruments from period to period result from our use of interest rate swap
agreements. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements in the estimated amount that we
would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current
interest rates and the current credit worthiness of both us and the swap counterparties. The
estimated amount is the present value of estimated future cash flows, being equal to the difference
between the benchmark interest rate and the fixed rate in the interest rate swap agreement,
multiplied by the notional principal amount of the interest rate swap agreement at each interest
reset date.

The fair value of our interest and currency swap agreements at the end of each period are most

significantly affected by the interest rate implied by market-observable data such as LIBOR yield
curve, and forward foreign exchange rates. While the fair value of our interest and currency swap
agreements are typically more sensitive to changes in short-term rates, significant changes in the
long-term benchmark interest and foreign exchange rates also materially impact our interest and
currency swap agreements.

The fair value of our interest and currency swap agreements are also affected by changes in our

specific credit risk included in the discount factor. Following the implementation of IFRS 13 Fair
Value Measurement in January 1, 2013, the Group adjusts its derivative liabilities fair value to
reflect its own credit risk and the counterparties’ risk. The estimate of the Group’s credit risk is
based on the credit rating of other companies in the LNG industry where publicly available, the
rating of the global transportation industry where the shipping industry is included and the feedback
that the Group receives from its lenders as part of the margin setting for the new loan agreements.
The counterparties’ credit risk is estimated either by using the credit default swap rates obtained
from public information or, if not available, by using the credit rating of the counterparties.

The LIBOR yield curve and our specific credit risk are expected to vary over the life of the
interest rate swap agreements. The larger the notional amount of the interest rate swap agreements
outstanding and the longer the remaining duration of the interest rate swap agreements, the larger
the impact of any variability in these factors will be on the fair value of our interest rate swaps. We
economically hedge the interest rate exposure on a significant amount of our long-term debt and for
long durations. As such, we have historically experienced, and we expect to continue to experience,
material variations in the period-to-period fair value of our derivative instruments.

71

Although we measure the fair value of our derivative instruments utilizing the inputs and

assumptions described above, if we were to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, the
amount we would pay or receive to terminate the derivative instruments may differ from our
estimate of fair value. If the estimated fair value differs from the actual termination amount, an
adjustment to the carrying amount of the applicable derivative asset or liability would be recognized
in earnings for the current period. Such adjustments could be material. See Note 21 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report for the effects on the
change in fair value of our derivative instruments on our consolidated statements of profit or loss.

Measurement of Equity-Settled Employee Benefits Expense

The Group used an accepted valuation methodology to value the Stock Appreciation Rights

granted in 2013. The inputs are based on observable market data and management’s estimates.
Details of the valuation methodology and significant assumptions used are set out in Note 18 of the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Impairment of Goodwill

We review goodwill for impairment at least annually. For the purpose of impairment testing,

goodwill has been allocated to the cash-generating unit representing our management company,
GasLog LNG Services, which was acquired by us in 2005.

In order to determine whether goodwill has been impaired, we estimate the value-in-use of the

cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated. The value-in-use calculation requires us to
estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the cash-generating unit and also a suitable
discount rate in order to calculate present value representing recoverable amount of the cash-
generating unit. In determining the value-in-use of the cash-generating unit as of December 31, 2013,
we used cash flow projections based on financial budgets approved by us covering a four-year period
and a terminal multiple of 8. Growth assumptions were based on conservative estimates and
considered the number of ships expected to be under our management for which contracts were in
place at the end of each year. The key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations are as
follows:

• average inflation of 2% per annum;
• a discount rate of 8% per annum;
• annual growth rate of nil; and
• 1 euro = 1.38 U.S. dollars.
We assessed the recoverable amount of goodwill at the end of each annual reportable period

and concluded that goodwill associated with our cash-generating unit was not impaired. We believe
that any reasonably possible further change in the key assumptions on which the recoverable amount
is based would not cause the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit to exceed its recoverable
amount.

Impairment of Vessels

The Group evaluates the carrying amounts of its vessels to determine whether there is any
indication that those vessels have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the
recoverable amount of vessels is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss,
if any.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax
discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks
specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. The
projection of cash flows related to vessels is complex and requires management to make various
estimates including future freight rates, earnings from the vessels and discount rates. All of these
items have been historically volatile. In assessing the fair value less cost to sell of the vessel, the

72

Group obtains vessel valuations from leading, independent and internationally recognized ship
brokers on an annual basis or when there is an indication that an asset or assets may be impaired. If
an indication of impairment is identified, the need for recognizing an impairment loss is assessed by
comparing the carrying amount of the vessels to the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the
value in use. No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented in the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

We incur from time to time expenditures relating to inspections for acquiring new vessels. Such

expenditures are insignificant and are expensed as they are incurred.

D. Trend Information

LNG Supply

According to Clarkson Research, the global seaborne trade of LNG cargoes was approximately
239 million tons per annum, or “mtpa” in 2012, almost the same as in 2011, albeit marginally down
(by 2.8%). Declines in LNG exports from countries such as Yemen, Indonesia, Egypt and Algeria
were partly offset by the commencement of production from the Pluto LNG project in Australia.
Based on preliminary trade statistics, world seaborne trade in LNG trade is estimated to have
declined by a further 0.4% in 2013. This marginal fall in trade is a result of limited liquefaction
capacity growth over the course of the year, coupled with import declines in both the United States
and Europe offsetting growth in non-OECD Asia. Looking ahead, based on the public
announcements of major LNG producers, new LNG production volumes should become available in
the 2014-2015 timeframe from projects in Angola, Australia, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia and
Algeria, which should in turn support a growth in global LNG volumes. In the longer term, the
United States may become a significant exporter of LNG, based on the existence of one project
currently under development and several more projects in the design stage, as well as the release of
a study in December 2012 commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy that concluded that
LNG exports would have a net beneficial effect on the U.S. economy. Very large gas discoveries
offshore East Africa may also result in both Mozambique and Tanzania potentially becoming
significant exporters of LNG in the longer term.

LNG Demand

Since 2008, the relatively low price of natural gas in the United States compared with the much

higher prices paid by LNG buyers in the Far East and elsewhere has supported the long distance
transport of LNG. Japan has been a key demand driver for LNG since the 2011 earthquake and
tsunami. Japan, together with China, South Korea, India, and Brazil saw their seaborne LNG
imports increase in 2012, compared to 2011. In 2012, GasLog also saw an increase in opportunities
for multi-year charters of LNG ships on order. While over time various factors may cause the gas
price disparity between regions to narrow, we believe that demand for gas, including LNG, will
remain strong over at least the next several years in countries that must import oil and gas for fuel
and feedstock.

Global LNG Fleet

According to Clarkson Research, the global fleet of dedicated LNG carriers stood at 387 ships
of 55.6 million cbm as of March 1, 2014. In 2013, eighteen LNG carriers were delivered, and forty-
four orders were placed, of which four were multi-gas carriers and one was a bunkering vessel. This
high level of ordering was driven in part by the significant developments in plans for new
liquefaction projects. Seven 1960s and 1970s built LNG carriers were reportedly sold for scrap in

73

2013 and the first two months of 2014, and ships of a similar age and propulsion-type have
experienced idle time.

We believe that the development of new LNG supply projects and growing global demand for

natural gas should support the existing order backlog for vessels and should also drive a need for
more LNG carriers in the future. In addition, LNG project developers are typically large
multinational oil and gas companies that have high standards for safety and reliability and a
preference for modern LNG carriers with fuel-efficient ship design and propulsion, which should
support the ability of experienced LNG operators, such as GasLog, to obtain new charters over new
or less experienced operators. However, various factors, including changes in prices and demand for
LNG can materially affect the competitive dynamics that currently exist.

The statements in this “Trend Information” section are forward-looking statements based on
management’s current expectations and certain material assumptions and, accordingly, involve risk
and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance and outcomes to differ materially from
those expressed herein. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report.

The information and data contained in this report that is attributed to Clarkson Research is
taken from Clarkson Research’s database and other sources. Clarkson Research has advised that: (i)
some information in Clarkson Research’s database is derived from estimates or subjective judgments,
(ii) the information in the databases of other maritime data collection agencies may differ from the
information in Clarkson Research’s database, and (iii) while Clarkson Research has taken reasonable
care in the compilation of the information and data and believes it to be accurate and correct, data
compilation is subject to limited audit and validation procedures.

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2013, we do not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that

should be considered off-balance sheet arrangements.

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013 were:

Borrowing obligations(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on borrowing obligations and

swaps(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loan arrangement fees and commitments. .
Shipbuilding contracts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating lease obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Payments Due by Period(3)

Less than
1 year

3-5 years
1-3 years
(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
$514,659
$ 130,515
$104,751

41,176
4,846
376,950
644
$528,367

88,577
422
897,856
477
$1,112,847

61,708
—
—
—
$576,367

Total

$1,138,237

203,018
5,268
1,274,806
1,121
$2,622,450

More than
5 years

$388,312

16,557
—
—
—
$404,869

(1) The table does not include obligations under the loan agreement we entered into through our subsidiaries on December

23, 2011 with DnB Bank ASA, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Danish Ship Finance A/S, ING Bank N.V. and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ), for $435 million. The first installment payment for any borrowings we make
under this loan agreement will be due three months after the delivery of the newbuildings that will serve as collateral
under the facility.

(2) Our interest commitment on long-term debt is calculated based on an assumed average applicable interest rate ranging

from 2.45% to 4.68%, which takes into account LIBOR of 0.25%, and the applicable margin spreads in our various debt
agreements and our fixed-rate interest rate swaps associated with each debt.

(3) The table does not include the aggregate cost of $468 million for the ships that will be acquired under the Pending Vessel
Acquisition and the obligations under the loan agreement to be entered into pursuant to the commitment from Citibank
for $325.5 million to partially finance this acquisition.

74

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A. Directors and Senior Management

The following table sets forth information regarding our directors and executive officers. The

business address of each of our executive officers and directors listed below is Gildo Pastor Center,
7 Rue du Gabian, MC 98000, Monaco. Our telephone number at that address is +377 97 97 51 15.
Members of our board of directors are elected annually, and each director elected holds office for a
one-year term. The following directors have been determined by our board of directors to be
independent: Paul J. Collins, William M. Friedrich, Dennis M. Houston, Anthony S. Papadimitriou
and Robert D. Somerville. Officers are elected from time to time by vote of our board of directors
and hold office until a successor is elected.

Name

Age

Position

Peter G. Livanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul Wogan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Philip Radziwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simon Crowe. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Graham Westgarth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bruce L. Blythe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul J. Collins. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William M. Friedrich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dennis M. Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Julian Metherell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anthony S. Papadimitriou . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Robert D. Somerville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55 Chairman and Director
51 Chief Executive Officer
33 Vice Chairman and Director
46 Chief Financial Officer
59 Chief Operating Officer
69 Director
77 Director
65 Director
62 Director
50 Director
58 Director
70 Director

Certain biographical information about each of these individuals is set forth below.

Peter G. Livanos is our Chairman and a member of our board of directors. Mr. Livanos
founded our subsidiary GasLog LNG Services in 2001. He has served as our Chairman since the
Company was incorporated in July 2003 and he held the role of Chief Executive Officer from
January 2012 until January 2013. Mr. Livanos is the chairman and sole shareholder of Ceres
Shipping, an international shipping group. He also serves as chairman of several of Ceres Shipping’s
subsidiaries, including DryLog Ltd., a company engaged in dry bulk shipping investments. In 1989
Mr. Livanos formed Seachem Tankers Ltd., which in 2000 combined with Odfjell ASA (later
renamed Odfjell SE). He served on the board of directors of Odfjell SE until 2008. Mr. Livanos
serves as the vice chairman of the board of directors of Euronav NV, an independent owner and
operator of oil tankers. Mr. Livanos is a graduate of Columbia University. He is the first cousin of
Philip Radziwill, our Vice Chairman and a member of our board of directors.

Paul Wogan is our Chief Executive Officer. From 2008 until February 2012, Mr. Wogan served

as senior independent director of Clarksons PLC. From 2000 to 2008, Mr. Wogan worked for
Teekay Corporation, where from November 2003 to March 2008 he served as president of Teekay
Tanker Services, with responsibility for the company’s fleet of crude and product tankers. Prior to
joining Teekay Corporation, Mr. Wogan served as chief executive officer of Seachem Tankers Ltd.
Mr. Wogan is also a non-executive director of Sure Wind Marine Ltd., a company that owns and
operates vessels that provide services to the offshore wind industry. Mr. Wogan is a graduate of
Exeter University and has an MBA from Cranfield School of Management.

Philip Radziwill is our Vice Chairman and a member of our board of directors. Mr. Radziwill

has been a director since October 2011 and he became our Vice Chairman in January 2012. In 2013
Mr. Radziwill stepped back from his executive position in the Company but maintains his support of
the Company’s management through his position on our board of directors. Mr. Radziwill also
serves as an advisor of SCP Clover Maritime, a company that manages assets and investments of the
Radziwill family, including the family’s investment in the Company. From 2006 to 2009, Mr.
Radziwill was employed in the equity group at Moore Capital Management LLC, a private
investment management firm based in New York, where he focused on a long/short equity strategy
within the energy industry. Prior to joining Moore Capital Management, Mr. Radziwill was

75

employed as an investment banker at Goldman, Sachs & Co. within the Industrial & Natural
Resources group. Mr. Radziwill is a graduate of Brown University. He is the first cousin of Peter G.
Livanos, our Chairman.

Simon Crowe became our Chief Financial Officer on April 1, 2013. From 2009 until 2012, Mr.

Crowe was chief financial officer of Subsea 7, an engineering, construction and services contractor to
the offshore energy industry. Subsea 7 is a global business, listed on the Norwegian Stock Exchange
that employs 12,000 people and operates in over 15 countries. Prior to 2009, Mr. Crowe worked for
Transocean Ltd., the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor, most recently as vice president,
strategy and planning, and prior to that as Finance Director for Transocean Ltd.’s Europe and
Africa operations. Mr. Crowe is a member of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
Mr. Crowe holds a degree in physics from the University of Liverpool. Mr. Crowe replaced Henrik
Bjerregaard, who served as our Chief Financial Officer until March 31, 2013.

Graham Westgarth is our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Westgarth joined the Company in
January 2013, and served as our Executive Vice President, Operations and Strategy, until June 2013.
From 1999 through 2012, Mr. Westgarth was a member of the Senior Leadership team of Teekay
Shipping, most recently serving as executive vice president of innovation, technology and projects of
Teekay Shipping, which included commercial and operational responsibility for a number of FSO’s.
From 2001 to 2010, Mr. Westgarth served as president, Teekay Marine Services with responsibility
for 5,000 sea and shore staff and the technical management of 200 vessels. During this period he
also served as chief executive officer of Teekay Petrojarl following its acquisition by Teekay
Corporation. From 1987 to 1999, Mr. Westgarth was employed by Maersk Company Limited, the
last 5 years of which he served as General Manager of the Maersk UK flag fleet. Mr. Westgarth is
the current chairman of INTERTANKO, an industry organisation, which represents 80% of the
world’s independent tanker owners and operators. Mr. Westgarth’s sea service includes serving in
various ranks with Common Bros, Rowbotham Tankers, and Maersk Company Limited. He was
promoted to Master at age 29 and subsequently served on crude/product carriers, LPG and chemical
carriers. He is a graduate of the Columbia University Senior Executive Development Program.

Bruce L. Blythe has been a member of our board of directors since October 2011. Mr. Blythe

has been involved in the shipping industry for over 15 years, having served as an advisor to the
Livanos family since 1994. For nearly 20 years, Mr. Blythe has served as an advisor on finance and
strategy to the chairman and chief executive officer of Ford Motor Company and to the Ford family,
and prior to his service as an advisor he was employed in various strategic and financial positions at
Ford Motor Company. Mr. Blythe serves as a director of Ceres Shipping, our largest shareholder.
Mr. Blythe holds an M.B.A. in finance and transportation and a B.A. in business administration
from Pennsylvania State University.

Paul J. Collins has been a member of our board of directors since October 2011. Mr. Collins

retired as Vice Chairman and member of the Management Committee of Citigroup Inc. in
September 2000. From 1985 to 1998, Mr. Collins served as a director of Citicorp and its principal
subsidiary Citibank; from 1988 to 1998 he served as vice chairman of those entities. Mr. Collins
currently serves as a trustee of the University of Wisconsin Foundation and The Glyndebourne Arts
Trust. He is also a member of the Advisory Board of Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, a private
equity firm. He was previously a director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Nokia Corporation, BG
Group and Enstar Group and a member of the Supervisory Board of Actis Capital LLP. Mr. Collins
is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin and holds an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business
School.

William M. Friedrich has been a member of our board of directors since October 2011 and
currently serves as our senior independent director. From 1995 until his retirement in 2008, Mr.
Friedrich was employed at BG Group plc. Mr. Friedrich held several senior executive positions
during his 14-year tenure at BG Group, including serving as executive director and deputy chief
executive from 2000 until 2008, with primary responsibility for BG Group’s overall strategy function
as well as oversight of the company’s business development activities and various company-wide
organizational and human resource matters. Between 2000 and 2005, his position at BG Group also
included the role of General Counsel. Prior to joining BG Group, Mr. Friedrich was a partner at

76

Shearman & Sterling LLP. He holds a J.D. from Columbia Law School and a B.A. from Union
College.

Dennis M. Houston has been a member of our board of directors since June 2013. At the time

he joined our board, Mr. Houston had approximately 40 years of experience in the downstream
sector of the oil and gas industry. Mr. Houston retired from Exxon Mobil on May 31, 2010, after
over 35 years with Exxon and then Exxon Mobil. His positions at retirement were Executive Vice
President Refining & Supply Company, Chairman and President of ExxonMobil Sales & Supply
LLC, and Chairman of Standard Tankers Bahamas Limited. Mr. Houston serves as a director of
PBF Energy Inc., Argus Media Limited L.L.C. and ABS Group and is an active member of several
other energy related organizations. He holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of
Illinois and an Honorary Doctorate of Public Administration Degree from Massachusetts Maritime
Academy.

Julian Metherell has been a member of our board of directors since October 2011. Mr.
Metherell is the chief financial officer of Genel Energy plc, a leading independent oil and gas
exploration and production company operating in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Genel Energy plc is
the successor to Vallares Plc, a publicly listed acquisition company which Mr. Metherell co-founded
in April 2011. Mr. Metherell also serves as a director of Genel Energy plc. From 1999 to 2011, Mr.
Metherell was a partner at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., where he served as chief executive
officer of the UK investment banking division. Prior to joining Goldman Sachs, Mr. Metherell was a
director in the European energy group at Dresdner Kleinwort, a London-based investment bank. Mr.
Metherell is a graduate of Manchester University, where he received a B.Sc. degree, and of
Cambridge University, where he received an M.B.A.

Anthony S. Papadimitriou has been a member of our board of directors since November 2011,

when he was designated by the Onassis Foundation to serve as one of our directors. Mr.
Papadimitriou is the managing partner of the law firm A.S. Papadimitriou and Partners, a position
he has held since 1992. From 1986 until 2005, Mr. Papadimitriou served as legal counsel for Olympic
Shipping & Management S.A, an affiliate of the Onassis Foundation, and since 1995 he has been the
coordinator of the Executive Committee of the commercial activities controlled by the Onassis
Foundation. In addition, Mr. Papadimitriou has been a member of the board of directors of the
Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation since 1988, serving as the president of the board
since 2005. Mr. Papadimitriou also serves as a director of Global Finance S.A., a Greek investment
firm. Mr. Papadimitriou is a graduate of the Athens University Law School and holds a postgraduate
degree in maritime and transport law from the University Aix-en-Provence, a B.Sc. from the London
School of Economics and a Ph.D. from the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

Robert D. Somerville has been a member of our board of directors since November 2011. Mr.

Somerville was employed at the American Bureau of Shipping, or “ABS”, the second-largest marine
classification society in the world for over 30 years. From 2004 until 2011 he served as the
company’s chairman and chief executive officer, and from 2011 to 2013 he served as the company’s
chairman. Mr. Somerville currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Maine Maritime
Academy, Keppel Offshore & Marine Limited and Knightsbridge Tankers. Mr. Somerville is a
graduate of Maine Maritime Academy, where he received a B.Sc. degree in Marine Engineering. He
has also received honorary degrees from the Webb Institute in New York and Maine Maritime
Academy.

Board Leadership Structure

Our board leadership structure consists of our Chairman, the senior independent director and

the chairmen of our board committees. Our operational management is headed by our Chief
Executive Officer, or “CEO”. Mr. Wogan, as CEO, is responsible for the day-to-day operations of
the Company, which includes decisions relating to the Company’s general management and control
of its affairs and business and works with our board in developing our business strategy. The board
of directors does not have a policy mandating that the roles of CEO and Chairman be held by
separate individuals, but believes that at this time the separation of such roles is appropriate and
beneficial to shareholders.

77

William M. Friedrich, who serves as our senior independent director, acts as a liaison to

facilitate communication between independent directors and our Chairman to ensure that the board
functions in an effective manner.

B. Compensation of Directors and Senior Management

Our non-executive directors receive:
• an annual fee of $100,000;
• an additional annual fee of $20,000 to the senior independent director;
• additional annual fees of $100,000 to the Chairman of the board, $50,000 to the chairman of
the audit and risk committee and $20,000 to the chairmen of the compensation committee,
corporate governance and nominating committee and HSSE committee; and

• additional annual fees of $25,000 to each member of the audit and risk committee and
$10,000 to each member of the compensation committee, corporate governance and
nominating committee and HSSE committee (in each case other than the chairmen of such
committees).

The board of directors may determine that a portion of the above fees will be paid in shares

rather than cash.

In addition, our directors receive reimbursement for their out-of-pocket expenses including
travel costs and other short-term benefits. We do not have any service contracts with our directors
that provide for benefits upon termination of their services.

For 2013, our executive officers were Paul Wogan, Simon Crowe (from April 2013), Henrik

Bjerregaard (until March 31) and Graham Westgarth (from January 2013). Compensation for our
executive officers in 2013 consisted of base salary and employee benefits that are generally provided
to employees, including eligibility to receive a cash incentive bonus pursuant to our Management
Incentive Plan, or “MIP”. The MIP provides all shore-based personnel (which includes our executive
officers) an opportunity to earn a cash incentive payment based on a target percentage of the
participant’s annual base salary, or “ABS”, subject to the achievement of pre-established individual
and Company performance objectives, as well as a factor based on Company discretion. Each
participant’s target percentage of ABS and the weightings assigned to the individual and Company
performance objectives and the Company discretionary component are dependent on the
participant’s organization (band) level. No amounts will be paid under the MIP to any participant
who fails to achieve 50% of his or her target individual performance objectives. In 2013, the
Company performance objectives were measured against three equally-weighted key business
indicators: Free Cash Flow per Share, Absolute Return on Invested Capital and three-year rolling
average Relative Total Shareholder Return. In addition, Company performance is evaluated against
a safety factor based on Total Recordable Cases Frequency, in which a failure to meet the safety
target may result in a reduction of the Company performance payout factor. We also established
stretch goals under the individual and Company performance objectives, which if met would result in
a payout at 120% of the individual’s target percentage of ABS. The Company discretionary
component may not increase an individual’s payment to more than 200% of his or her target
percentage of ABS. The amounts paid to our executive officers in 2013 pursuant to the MIP were
determined based on the following weightings: individual performance (30%), Company performance
(50%) and Company discretion (20%).

The aggregate amount of cash compensation, including cash incentive compensation, paid to our

executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $2.79 million (which includes a
relocation bonus for Graham Westgarth and does not include garden leave payments for Henrik
Bjerregaard).

In addition, each of our executive officers was eligible to receive equity-based compensation

awards in accordance with the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, or the “Plan”. In May
2013, we granted our executive officers an aggregate of 202,865 stock appreciation rights and 40,324
restricted stock units under the Plan, with an aggregate fair value as of the grant date of

78

$963,725.63. The stock appreciation rights have an exercise price per share of $13.26 and will vest in
three equal annual installments, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to the
recipient’s continued service. The restricted stock units vest on the third anniversary of the grant
date, subject to the recipient’s continued service. The stock appreciation rights and the restricted
stock units may be settled in cash or common shares, or a combination thereof, at our discretion.

In the future, we intend to determine during the February meeting of the board of the directors

which individuals, if any, will receive equity-based compensation awards under the Plan for such
year and the amount of awards each participant will receive. In addition, we intend to grant such
awards on April 1 of such year (or, should April 1 of such year fall on a weekend or bank holiday,
on the first business day thereafter).

We did not set aside or accrue any amounts in the year ended December 31, 2013 to provide

pension, retirement or similar benefits to our directors or executive officers.

Special Bonus

In July 2011, our board of directors approved the award of a special bonus of $3.8 million in

the aggregate to certain key members of management for their achievements in the successful
negotiation of commercial terms and conditions with the shipyard for the construction of two of the
Group’s newbuildings (Hull Number 2016 and Hull Number 2017). The balance is payable in
installments consistent with the payments due to the shipyard. A total amount of $1.67 million was
paid during the year ended December 31, 2013 pursuant to the special bonus. As of December 31,
2013, there is no outstanding amount in respect of the special bonus. See Note 17 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

C. Board Practices

Our board of directors consists of nine members. The board of directors may change the
number of directors to not less than three, nor more than fifteen. Each director shall be elected to
serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until his successor is elected or appointed,
except in the event of removal, death, disability, disqualification or resignation. A vacancy on the
board created by removal, death, disability, disqualification or resignation of a director, or as a result
of an increase in the size of the board, may be filled by the shareholders or by the board of
directors.

We are a “foreign private issuer” under the securities laws of the United States and the rules of

the NYSE. Under the securities laws of the United States, “foreign private issuers” are subject to
different disclosure requirements than U.S. domiciled registrants, as well as different financial
reporting requirements. Under the NYSE rules, a “foreign private issuer” is subject to less stringent
corporate governance requirements. Subject to certain exceptions, the rules of the NYSE permit a
“foreign private issuer” to follow its home country practice in lieu of the listing requirements of the
NYSE, including (i) the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent
directors, (ii) the requirement that the nominating committee be composed entirely of independent
directors and have a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, (iii) the
requirement that the compensation committee be composed entirely of independent directors and
have a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (iv) the
requirement of an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and corporate governance and
compensation committees. A majority of our board of directors qualify as independent. We have one
or more non-independent directors serving as committee members on our compensation committee
and our corporate governance and nominating committee. As a result, non-independent directors
may, among other things, participate in fixing the compensation of our management, making share
and option awards and resolving governance issues regarding our Company. Accordingly, in the
future you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are
subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

79

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit and Risk Committee

Our audit and risk committee consists of Messrs. Collins, Friedrich, Houston and Somerville,

with Mr. Collins serving as the committee chairman. Mr. Metherell also served on Audit and Risk
Committee in 2013. Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that each of these
individuals meets the definition of “independent director” for purposes of serving on an audit
committee under applicable SEC and NYSE rules. Mr. Collins qualifies as an “audit committee
financial expert”. The audit and risk committee is responsible for:

• the appointment and compensation (subject to any required shareholder approval or

authorization) and retention and oversight of independent auditors and determining whether
any non-audit services will be performed by such auditor;

• assisting the board of directors in overseeing our financial reporting process, the integrity of

our financial statements, the independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and
performance, the performance of our internal audit and financial risk management
departments and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

• annually reviewing the independent auditors’ report describing the auditing firm’s internal

quality-control procedures, and any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-
control review, or peer review, of the auditing firm;

• discussing with management and the independent auditors, and making recommendations to

our board regarding the approval of, the annual audited financial statements and any periodic
financial statements;

• discussing earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance
provided to analysts and rating agencies, with management and the independent auditors;

• discussing policies with respect to financial risk assessment and risk management and

monitoring our financial risk and risk management systems;

• meeting periodically and separately with management, our internal audit department and the

independent auditors;

• reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties and management’s

responses;

• setting clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent auditors;
• annually reviewing the adequacy of the audit and risk committee’s written charter;
• periodically reviewing the budget, responsibilities and organizational structure of the internal

audit department;

• establishing procedures for the consideration of all related-party transactions, including

matters involving potential conflicts of interest;

• reporting regularly to the full board of directors; and
• handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the audit and risk committee by

the board of directors from time to time.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee consists of Messrs. Blythe, Collins, Metherell and Radziwill, with
Mr. Metherell serving as the committee chairman. The compensation committee is responsible for:
• making recommendations to the full board of directors with respect to the compensation of
directors, senior management, the head of internal audit and other managerial employees
reporting to the CEO;

• overseeing and making recommendations to the full board of directors with respect to any of

the Company’s long-term incentive plans, including any equity-based compensation plans to be
adopted; and

80

• handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the compensation committee by

the board of directors from time to time.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Our corporate governance and nominating committee consists of Messrs. Blythe, Friedrich,
Livanos and Papadimitriou, with Mr. Friedrich serving as the committee chairman. The corporate
governance and nominating committee is responsible for:

• identifying and recommending candidates, consistent with criteria approved by the full board

of directors, for nomination to be elected by shareholders at annual meetings and for
approval of the board of directors to fill board vacancies as and when they arise between
annual meetings, as well as putting in place short- and long-term succession plans for senior
management and the Chief Executive Officer’s direct reports;

• developing and recommending to the full board of directors corporate governance guidelines

applicable to the Company and keeping such guidelines under review;

• overseeing self-evaluations conducted by the board of directors and its committees and

overseeing evaluations of senior management; and

• handling such other matters that are specifically delegated to the corporate governance and

nominating committee by the board of directors from time to time.

Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Committee

Our health, safety, security and environmental, or “HSSE”, committee consists of Messrs.
Houston, Livanos and Somerville, with Mr. Somerville serving as the committee chairman. The
HSSE committee is responsible for:

• overseeing the Company’s top-level HSSE policies (including those relating to operational

risks);

• reviewing the Company’s HSSE policies (including those relating to operational risks) on an

annual basis and recommending changes to such policies to the Company’s management team;
• based on reports from management, evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s systems to

achieve the established HSSE policies;

• receiving reports from management relating to any serious accidents or fatalities and
reviewing recommended actions to be taken by management in connection therewith;

• overseeing whether the Company’s HSSE policies take appropriate account of internal and

external developments and expectations;

• evaluating and overseeing the quality of reporting systems required by third parties on HSSE

related matters; and

• assessing the systems within the Company for ensuring compliance with HSSE related laws,

regulations and policies.

Senior Independent Director

Mr. Friedrich, an independent director, currently serves as our senior independent director. Our

senior independent director is responsible for:

• presiding at board and shareholder meetings if the Chairman of the board is absent;
• meeting with the other members of the board without the Chairman present on at least an

annual basis in order to evaluate and appraise the performance of the Chairman;

• chairing the corporate governance and nominating committee when considering succession to

the role of the Chairman of the board;

• chairing meetings of our independent directors;

81

• acting as a liaison, if required, to facilitate communication between independent directors and

our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and any member of senior management; and
• performing such other functions as the board may direct or request from time to time.

Corporate Governance

The board of directors and our Company’s management engage in an ongoing review of our
corporate governance practices in order to oversee our compliance with the applicable corporate
governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all directors, officers, employees

and agents of the Company.

This document and other important information on our governance are posted on our website
and may be viewed at http://www.gaslogltd.com. We will also provide a paper copy of any of these
documents upon the written request of a shareholder at no cost. Shareholders may direct their
requests to the attention of our Head of Legal, Line Køhler Ljungdahl, c/o GasLog Monaco S.A.M.,
Gildo Pastor Center, 7 Rue du Gabian, MC 98000, Monaco.

D. Employees

As of December 31, 2013, we had 103 full-time employees and 23 contractors and outsourced
employees, all of whom are based in our offices in Piraeus, Greece, Monaco, or the newbuildings
site at Samsung Heavy Industries in South Korea. In addition to our shoreside employees and sub-
contractors, we had approximately 1,037 seafaring staff serving on our owned and managed ships.
These seafarers are retained through crewing agencies based in Ukraine, the Philippines and Spain
or, in the case of Greek seafarers, through short-term employment contracts. As we take delivery of
our newbuildings, we expect to retain a significant number of additional seafarers qualified to man
and operate our new ships, as well as additional shoreside personnel. We intend to focus our hiring
efforts in the Ukrainian, Philippine and Spanish markets, where we have crewing agency agreements
in place, and in Greece. The number of our shoreside employees, sub-contractors and seafaring staff
increased significantly in 2012 due to the contracted expansion of our fleet.

LNG marine transportation is a specialized area requiring technically skilled officers and crew

with specialized training. We regard attracting and retaining motivated, well-qualified seagoing
personnel as a top priority, and we offer our crew competitive compensation packages. In addition,
we provide intensive onboard training for our officers and crews to instill a culture of the highest
operational and safety standards. As a result, we have historically enjoyed a high retention rate
among our officers and other seafarers. In 2013, our retention rate was 93.0% for senior officers,
96.0% for other officers and 96.7% for shore staff.

Although we have historically experienced a high retention rate for our seafarers, the demand

for technically skilled officers and crews to serve on LNG carriers has been increasing as the global
fleet of LNG carriers continues to grow. This increased demand has and may continue to put
inflationary pressure on crew costs. However, we expect that the impact of cost increases would be
mitigated to some extent by certain provisions in our time charters, including review provisions and
cost pass-through provisions.

E. Share Ownership

The common shares beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers and/or entities

affiliated with these individuals is disclosed in “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—A. Major Shareholders” below. For information regarding arrangements for involving
the employees in the capital of the company, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and
Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Senior Management—Equity Compensation Plans”.

82

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. Major Shareholders

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our

outstanding common shares as of March 26, 2014 held by:

• each of our executive officers;
• each of our directors;
• all our directors and officers as a group; and
• each holder known to us to beneficially own 5% or more of our shares;
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules. Percentage computations are
based on an aggregate of 76,105,626 common shares outstanding as of March 26, 2014. Each issued
and outstanding common share will entitle the shareholder to one vote. Information for certain
holders is based on their latest filings with the SEC or information delivered to us. Except as noted
below, the address of all shareholders, officers and directors identified in the table and the
accompanying footnotes below is in care of our principal executive offices.

Identity of Person or Group

Officers and directors
Peter G. Livanos(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul Wogan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simon Crowe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Graham Westgarth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bruce L. Blythe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul J. Collins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
William M. Friedrich . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dennis M. Houston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Julian Metherell. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Anthony S. Papadimitriou. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Philip Radziwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Robert D. Somerville . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All officers and directors as a group (twelve persons) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other 5% beneficial owners
Alexander S. Onassis Foundation(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Common Shares
Beneficially Held

Number
of Shares

Percentage

31,548,442
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31,809,788

41.45%
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
—
*
41.80%

6,417,004

8.43%

(1) By virtue of common shares held directly, as well as indirectly through Blenheim Holdings Ltd., or Blenheim Holdings,
and common shares held by Falconera Navigation Inc. (“Falconera”), which may be deemed attributable to Mr. Livanos
because he is an officer and a board member of Falconera. Mr. Livanos has a majority ownership interest in Blenheim
Holdings through Ceres Shipping Ltd., and he is a beneficial owner of other shares held indirectly through Blenheim
Holdings for the benefit of Mr. Livanos and members of his family. Mr. Livanos’s ownership interest changed in
connection with the sale of shares by Blenheim Holdings to the Alexander S. Onassis Foundation, or the Onassis
Foundation, in December 2011 (see note 2), the purchase by Blenheim Holdings of certain outstanding manager shares in
January 2012, and a transfer by Blenheim Holdings of 657,090 shares to one of its minority shareholders in March 2014 in
exchange for such shareholder’s interest in Blenheim Holdings. Mr. Livanos effectively controls the Company through
direct and indirect ownership interests.

(2) By virtue of common shares held indirectly through its wholly owned subsidiary, Olympic LNG Investments Ltd. The

shares were acquired from Blenheim Holdings in December 2011 and from the Company in a private placement in January
2014. The Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation is the sole beneficiary of the assets and income of the Onassis
Foundation, and as a result may be deemed to have indirect beneficial ownership of the shares.

* Less than 1%.

In March 2012, we completed a registered public offering of our shares of common shares and
our common shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Our major shareholders have
the same voting rights as our other shareholders. As of March 20, 2014, we had approximately
15,967 shareholders.

83

B. Related Party Transactions

Restrictive Covenant Agreement

On April 4, 2012, Peter G. Livanos and Blenheim Holdings entered into a Restrictive Covenant
Agreement with us, pursuant to which Mr. Livanos is prohibited from directly or indirectly owning,
operating or managing LNG vessels, other than pursuant to his involvement with us. The restrictions
will terminate in the event that Mr. Livanos ceases to beneficially own at least 20% of our issued
and outstanding share capital.

Notwithstanding these restrictions, Mr. Livanos is permitted to engage in the following activities:
• passive ownership (a) of minority interests in any business that is not primarily engaged in

owning, operating or managing LNG vessels or (b) constituting less than 5% of any publicly
listed company; and

• non-passive participation in a business that acquires an interest in the ownership, operation or
management of LNG vessels, provided that as promptly as reasonably practicable either (A)
the business enters into an agreement to dispose of such competitive activity and such
disposition is completed within a reasonable time, or (B) Mr. Livanos’s participation in such
business is changed so as to satisfy the exception for passive ownership of minority interests
in a business that is not primarily engaged in a competitive activity.

The restrictions described above do not apply to transactions by independent fund managers not

acting under the direction or control of Mr. Livanos or Blenheim Holdings.

In addition, under the terms of the restrictive covenant agreement, Mr. Livanos and Blenheim
Holdings agreed that, subject to the exceptions described below, they would not sell or dispose of
any of our common shares owned by them as of the date of the agreement for a period of 18
months following the closing of GasLog’s initial public offering.

As noted above, Mr. Livanos and Blenheim Holdings are permitted under the terms of the
restrictive covenant agreement to dispose of our common shares in the following circumstances:

• pursuant to any transfer by Blenheim Holdings to its shareholders (including any division of
the ownership interests in Blenheim Holdings of Mr. Livanos and members of the Radziwill
family), provided that the transferee or transferees agree to be bound by the share transfer
restrictions of the restrictive covenant agreement;

• pursuant to any private sale to a strategic investor in the Company, provided that the

strategic investor agrees to be bound by the share transfer restrictions of the restrictive
covenant agreement;

• in connection with any sale or transfer that would result in a change in control of the

Company, provided that such change in control has been approved by our board of directors;
and

• in transactions relating to shares acquired following the effective date of the restrictive

covenant agreement.

For purposes of the restrictive covenant agreement, a “change of control” means Mr. Livanos
and Blenheim Holdings cease to beneficially own, in the aggregate, at least 38% of the issued and
outstanding share capital of the Company. The share transfer restrictions described above will
terminate as to any person that ceases to beneficially own, or does not beneficially own, at least
20% of our issued and outstanding share capital.

Registration Rights Agreement

On April 4, 2012, we entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of our

shareholders, pursuant to which we granted such shareholders and their transferees the right, under
certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions, including restrictions included in the lock-up
agreements to which they will be a party, to require us to register under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the “Securities Act”, our common shares held by those persons. Under the
registration rights agreement, certain of our shareholders and their transferees have the right to

84

request us to register the sale of shares held by them on their behalf and may require us to make
available shelf registration statements permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time
over an extended period. While these demand registration rights are subject to certain timing and
other restrictions, there is no limit on the number of times a shareholder may exercise such rights.
In addition, those persons have the ability to exercise certain piggyback registration rights in
connection with registered offerings initiated by us. Our shareholders who are party to the
registration rights agreement own a total of 38,951,742 common shares entitled to these registration
rights. In March 2014, these shareholders submitted a Demand Registration Request (as defined in
the Registration Rights Agreement) to the Company. In response to the Request, as required under
the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is preparing a Registration Statement on Form F-3
registering the common shares entitled to registration rights in addition to other common shares held
by the Company’s directors and officers.

Subscription Agreements

On January 16, 2014, we entered into subscription agreements with certain of our directors and

officers for a concurrent private placement of 2,317,460 common shares at a price of $15.75 per
share.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers which provide,

among other things, that we will indemnify our directors and officers, under the circumstances and
to the extent provided for therein, for expenses, damages, judgments, fines, settlements and fees that
they may be required to pay in actions or proceedings to which they are or may be made a party by
reason of such person’s position as a director, officer, employee or other agent of the Company,
subject to, and to the maximum extent permitted by, applicable law.

Office Space and Related Arrangements

Through our subsidiary GasLog LNG Services, we lease our office space in Piraeus, Greece
from an entity controlled by Ceres Shipping, Nea Dimitra Ktimatikh Kai Emporikh S.A. The lease
agreement is filed with the Greek authorities, and has been entered into on market rates.

We lease our office space in London, England from Unisea Maritime Limited, an entity
controlled by our chairman, Peter Livanos. We pay a fixed bi-monthly fee that is consistent with
market rates for use of the office space and receptionist services.

GasLog LNG Services has also entered into an agreement with Seres S.A., an entity controlled

by the Livanos family, for the latter to provide catering services to the staff based in our Piraeus
office. Amounts paid pursuant to the agreement are generally less than €10 per person per day, but
are slightly higher on special occasions. In addition, GasLog LNG Services has entered into an
agreement with Seres S.A. for the latter to provide telephone and documentation services for our
staff based in Piraeus. Amounts paid pursuant to the agreement are less than €100,000 per year.

Through our subsidiary GasLog Monaco S.A.M., we made payments to Ceres Monaco S.A.M.,

an affiliate of Ceres Shipping, for our office space in Monaco. Ceres Monaco S.A.M. leased
operating space pursuant to a service agreement with a third-party property owner, and we occupied
a portion of the leased space. The service level agreement was terminated in April 2012 when
GasLog Monaco S.A.M. signed a rent agreement directly with the third party property owner. The
amount of $0.03 million charged in the year ended December 31, 2013 relates to reimbursement of
certain expenses paid by Ceres Monaco S.A.M. on behalf of the GasLog Monaco S.A.M.

Egypt LNG

We have a 25% ownership interest in Egypt LNG, whose principal asset is the LNG carrier

Methane Nile Eagle, which is currently operating under a 20-year time charter with a subsidiary of
BG Group. Through our subsidiary GasLog LNG Services, we supervised the construction of the

85

Methane Nile Eagle, which was delivered from the shipyard in 2007. Pursuant to a ship management
agreement between GasLog LNG Services and Egypt LNG, the vessel has operated under our
technical management since its delivery. From January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, we received a
total of approximately $0.71 million in revenues from Egypt LNG in respect of our vessel
management services.

Insurance Brokerage

We procure insurance for our ships through C Transport Maritime S.A.M., an affiliate of Ceres
Shipping, which has a dedicated insurance function. This relationship is covered by an insurance and
claims handling agreement under which we pay C Transport Maritime S.A.M. $10,000 per owned
ship per annum and $3,000 per managed ship per annum, which we believe is consistent with market
rates.

Shipbuilding Commissions

Pursuant to commission agreements with Samsung Heavy Industries, commissions due from the

shipyard in relation to three of our newbuilding orders will be paid and for the GasLog Shanghai,
the GasLog Santiago, the GasLog Sydney, the GasLog Skagen and the GasLog Seattle, such
commissions were paid by Samsung Heavy Industries to DryLog Investments Ltd., an affiliate of
Ceres Shipping. Upon receipt of the commissions, DryLog Investments Ltd. forwards the payments
to our ship-owning subsidiaries, after deducting handling fees for each payment. In the aggregate,
these handling fees will amount to less than $100,000 for the three newbuildings on order, the
GasLog Shanghai, the GasLog Santiago, the GasLog Sydney, the GasLog Skagen and the GasLog
Seattle.

Employee Incentive Program

In May 2009, Ceres Shipping provided a promissory letter to our subsidiary, GasLog LNG
Services, relating to the funding of an employee incentive program we established for key employees
of GasLog LNG Services. Pursuant to the promissory letter, Ceres Shipping agreed to contribute to
GasLog LNG Services an amount equal to 2.8% of all dividends declared by us. These contributions
from Ceres Shipping were in turn distributed to key employees of GasLog LNG Services through its
wholly owned subsidiary, GasLog LNG Services Employee Incentive Scheme Ltd. The contributions
by Ceres Shipping totaled $483,000 and $238,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2011, respectively, and were recorded by us as non-cash capital contributions. The promissory letter
from Ceres Shipping was terminated on August 31, 2012, and the related employee incentive
program was terminated in 2013.

Other Transactions

For a description of additional related party transactions, see Note 17 to our consolidated

financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.

Procedures for Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions

Related party transactions, which means transactions in which the Company or one of its

subsidiaries is a participant and any of the Company’s directors, executive officers or significant
shareholders, or any members of their immediate families or entities controlled by them, have a
direct or indirect interest, will be subject to review and approval or ratification by our audit and risk
committee in accordance with the Related Party Transaction Policy adopted by such committee.

C. Interests of Experts and Counsel

Not applicable.

86

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

See “Item 18. Financial Statements” below.

Legal Proceedings

We have not been involved in any legal proceedings that we believe may have a significant
effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity, and we are not aware of
any proceedings that are pending or threatened that may have a material effect on our business,
financial position, results of operations or liquidity. From time to time, we may be subject to legal
proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, principally property damage and personal
injury claims. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary
deductibles. However, those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of
significant financial and managerial resources.

Dividend Policy

We paid our first cash dividend since becoming a public company in March 2012 on December

17, 2012 in an amount of $0.11 per share. We have subsequently paid dividends to holders of our
common shares of $0.11 per share on March 25, 2013, June 11, 2013 and September 13, 2013, and
$0.12 per share on December 9, 2013 and March 25, 2014.

As our fleet expands, we will evaluate changes to the quarterly dividend consistent with our

cash flow and liquidity position. Our policy is to pay dividends in amounts that will allow us to
retain sufficient liquidity to fund our obligations as well as execute our business plan going forward.
The declaration and payment of any dividend is subject to the discretion of our board of directors
and the requirements of Bermuda law. In addition, our credit facilities impose limitations on our
ability to pay dividends. Our board of directors will determine the timing and amount of all
dividend payments, based on various factors, including our earnings, financial condition, cash
requirements and availability, restrictions in our credit facilities and the provisions of Bermuda law.
Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to pay quarterly dividends. See “Item 3. Key
Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business” for a discussion of risks related to
our ability to pay dividends.

Set out below is a table showing the dividends declared in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Year ended December 31,

2009

2010
(Expressed in millions of U.S. dollars)

2013

2012

2011

Total

Dividends declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$— $17.25

$8.50

$6.91

$28.29

$60.95

B. Significant Changes

See “Item 18. Financial Statements—Note 25. Subsequent Events” below.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

Trading on the New York Stock Exchange

Since our IPO in the United States on March 30, 2012, our common shares have been listed on
the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GLOG”. The following table shows the high and
low closing sales prices for our common shares during the indicated periods.

87

Price Range

High

Low

Year ended December 31, 2012 (March 30, 2012 to December 31, 2012) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year ended December 31, 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
September 2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
October 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
January 2014. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
February 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March 1, 2014 to March 26, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$12.54
17.41
12.49
11.65
12.54
13.30
13.91
15.17
17.41
15.17
15.16
15.93
17.41
22.00
21.87
24.30

$ 8.95
11.93
8.95
9.54
10.55
12.10
11.93
12.63
14.11
13.59
14.11
15.01
15.20
16.24
19.71
21.70

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. Share Capital

Our authorized share capital consists of 500,000,000 shares, par value $0.01 per share, of which

62,863,166 common shares were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013.

Pursuant to our bye-laws, subject to any resolution of the shareholders to the contrary, our
board of directors is authorized to issue any of our authorized but unissued common shares. There
are no limitations on the right of non-Bermudians or non-residents of Bermuda to hold or vote our
shares.

B. Memorandum of Association

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda. We are registered with
the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda under registration number 33928. We were incorporated on
July 16, 2003 under the name Gaslog Ltd. We effected a change of name from “Gaslog Ltd.” to
“GasLog Ltd.” on August 23, 2011 in compliance with the Companies Act. Our registered office is
located at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda.

The objects of our business are unrestricted, and the Company has the capacity of a natural

person. We can therefore undertake activities without restriction on our capacity.

Common Shares

Holders of our common shares have no pre-emptive, redemption, conversion or sinking fund
rights. Holders of our common shares are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to
a vote of holders of common shares. Unless a different majority is required by law or by our bye-
laws, resolutions to be approved by holders of our common shares require approval by a simple
majority of votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present.

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of our common shares are

entitled to share equally and ratably in our assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all of our
debts and liabilities, subject to any liquidation preference on any issued and outstanding preference
shares.

Preference Shares

Pursuant to Bermuda law and our bye-laws, our board of directors by resolution may establish
one or more series of preference shares having such number of shares, designations, dividend rates,

88

relative voting rights, conversion or exchange rights, redemption rights, liquidation rights and other
relative participation, optional or other special rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions as may
be fixed by the board without any further shareholder approval.

Dividend Rights

Under Bermuda law, a company may not declare or pay dividends if there are reasonable
grounds for believing that: (i) the company is, or would after the payment be, unable to pay its
liabilities as they become due; or (ii) the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than its
liabilities. Under our bye-laws, each common share is entitled to dividends if, as and when dividends
are declared by our board of directors.

Any cash dividends payable to holders of our common shares listed on the NYSE will be paid

to American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, our transfer agent in the United States for
disbursement to those holders.

Variation of Rights

If at any time we have more than one class of shares, the rights attaching to any class, unless
otherwise provided for by the terms of issue of the relevant class, may be varied with the sanction
of a resolution passed by a majority of the issued shares of such class. Our bye-laws specify that the
creation or issue of shares ranking equally with existing shares will not, unless expressly provided by
the terms of issue of existing shares, vary the rights attached to existing shares.

Transfer of Shares

Our board of directors may in its absolute discretion and without assigning any reason refuse to

register the transfer of a share that it is not fully paid. Our board of directors may also refuse to
recognize an instrument of transfer of a share unless it is accompanied by the relevant share
certificate and such other evidence of the transferor’s right to make the transfer as our board of
directors shall reasonably require. In addition, our board of directors may refuse to register the
transfer of a share unless all applicable consents, authorizations and permissions of any governmental
body or agency in Bermuda have been obtained. Subject to these restrictions, a holder of common
shares may transfer the title to all or any of his common shares by completing a form of transfer in
the form set out in our bye-laws (or as near thereto as circumstances admit) or in such other
common form as the board may accept. The instrument of transfer must be signed by the transferor
and transferee, although in the case of a fully paid share our board of directors may accept the
instrument signed only by the transferor.

Meetings of Shareholders

We are required to convene at least one general meeting of shareholders each calendar year.
Bermuda law provides that a special general meeting of shareholders may be called by the board of
directors of a company and must be called upon the request of shareholders holding not less than
10% of the paid-up capital of the company carrying the right to vote at general meetings. Bermuda
law also requires that shareholders be given at least five days’ advance notice of a general meeting,
but an unintentional failure notice to any person does not invalidate the proceedings at a meeting.
Our bye-laws provide that the Chairman or our board of directors may convene an annual general
meeting or a special general meeting. Under our bye-laws, at least 10 days’ notice of an annual
general meeting or a special general meeting must be given to each shareholder entitled to vote at
such meeting. This notice requirement is subject to the ability to hold such meetings on shorter
notice if such notice is agreed: (i) in the case of an annual general meeting, by all of the
shareholders entitled to attend and vote at such meeting; or (ii) in the case of a special general
meeting, by a majority in number of the shareholders entitled to attend and vote at the meeting
holding not less than 95% in nominal value of the shares entitled to vote at such meeting. The
quorum required for a general meeting of shareholders is one or more persons present in person
throughout the meeting and representing in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of all issued and

89

outstanding common shares. General meetings can be convened at a location in or outside of
Bermuda. Our bye-laws provide that our board of directors may, but is not required to, make
arrangements permitting shareholders to participate in general meetings by such telephonic,
electronic or other communications facilities or means as permit all persons participating in the
meeting to communicate with each other simultaneously and instantaneously.

Access to Books and Records and Dissemination of Information

Members of the general public have a right to inspect public documents of the Company

available at the office of the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda. These documents include the
Company’s memorandum of association, including its objects and powers, and certain alterations to
the memorandum of association. Our shareholders have the additional right to inspect the bye-laws
of the Company, minutes of general meetings and the Company’s audited financial statements, which
must be presented to the annual general meeting. The Company’s register of members is also open
to inspection by shareholders and by members of the general public without charge. The register of
members is required under Bermuda law to be open for inspection for not less than two hours in
any business day (subject to the ability of a company to close the register of members for not more
than thirty days in a year). The Company is required to maintain its share register in Bermuda but
may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Act, establish a branch register outside of Bermuda.
The Company is required to keep at its registered office a register of directors and officers that is
open for inspection for not less than two hours in any business day by members of the public
without charge. Bermuda law does not, however, provide a general right for shareholders to inspect
or obtain copies of any other corporate records.

Election and Removal of Directors

Our bye-laws provide that our board shall consist of no less than three directors and no more

than fifteen directors, as the board of directors may from time to time determine. Our board of
directors consists of eight directors.

Any shareholder wishing to propose for election as a director someone who is not an existing
director or is not proposed by our board must give notice of the intention to propose the person for
election. Where a director is to be elected at an annual general meeting, that notice must be given
not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the anniversary of the last annual general
meeting prior to the giving of the notice or, in the event the annual general meeting is called for a
date that is not 30 days before or after such anniversary, the notice must be given not later than 10
days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the annual general meeting was posted to
shareholders or the date on which public disclosure of the date of the annual general meeting was
made. Where a director is to be elected at a special general meeting that notice must be given not
later than 10 days following the earlier of the date on which notice of the special general meeting
was posted to shareholders or the date on which public disclosure of the date of the special general
meeting was made.

A director may be removed by the shareholders, provided notice of the shareholders’ meeting
convened to remove the director is given to the director. The notice must contain a statement of the
intention to remove the director and must be served on the director not less than 14 days before the
meeting. The director is entitled to attend the meeting and be heard on the motion for his or her
removal.

Proceedings of Board of Directors

Our bye-laws provide that our business is to be managed and conducted by our board of

directors. Bermuda law requires that our directors be individuals, but there is no requirement in our
bye-laws or Bermuda law that directors hold any of our shares. There is also no requirement in our
bye-laws or Bermuda law that our directors must retire at a certain age.

The remuneration of our directors is determined by the board of directors, and there is no

requirement that a specified number or percentage of “independent” directors must approve any

90

such determination. Our directors may also be paid all travel, hotel and other expenses properly
incurred by them in connection with our business or their duties as directors.

Director Conflicts of Interest

Any conflict of interest question involving one or more of the Company’s directors will be

resolved by the audit and risk committee of the board of directors.

In the event that a director has a direct or indirect interest in any contract or arrangement with

the Company, provided that the director discloses such interest as required by Bermuda law, such
director is entitled under our bye-laws to vote in respect of any such contract or arrangement in
which he or she is interested unless he or she is disqualified from voting by the Chairman of our
board of directors. In the event that the Chairman has disclosed a direct or indirect interest in a
contract or arrangement with us, the determination as to whether the Chairman and any other
interested director should be disqualified from voting will be made by a majority of the disinterested
directors.

Bermuda law prohibits any director (including the spouse or children of the director or any
company of which such director, spouse or children own or control more than 20% of the capital or
loan debt) from borrowing from us (except loans made to directors who are bona fide employees or
former employees pursuant to an employees’ share scheme) unless shareholders holding 90% of the
total voting rights have consented to the loan.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Section 98 of the Companies Act provides generally that a Bermuda company may indemnify its

directors, officers and auditors against any liability which by virtue of any rule of law would
otherwise be imposed on them in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of
trust, except in cases where such liability arises from fraud or dishonesty of which such director,
officer or auditor may be guilty in relation to the company. Section 98 further provides that a
Bermuda company may indemnify its directors, officers and auditors against any liability incurred by
them in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is awarded in their
favor or in which they are acquitted or granted relief by the Supreme Court of Bermuda pursuant to
section 281 of the Companies Act.

We have adopted provisions in our bye-laws that provide that we shall indemnify our officers
and directors in respect of their actions and omissions, except in respect of their fraud or dishonesty.
Our bye-laws provide that the shareholders waive all claims or rights of action that they might have,
individually or in right of the Company, against any of the Company’s directors or officers for any
act or failure to act in the performance of such director’s or officer’s duties, except in respect of any
fraud or dishonesty of such director or officer. Section 98A of the Companies Act permits us to
purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit of any officer or director in respect of any loss or
liability attaching to him in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust,
whether or not we may otherwise indemnify such officer or director. We have purchased and
maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for such purpose. We have also entered into
indemnification agreements with our directors and officers. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and
Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions”.

Amendment of Memorandum of Association and Bye-laws

Bermuda law provides that the memorandum of association of a company may be amended by

a resolution passed at a general meeting of shareholders. Our bye-laws provide that no bye-law shall
be rescinded, altered or amended, and no new bye-law shall be made, unless it shall have been
approved by a resolution of our board of directors and by a resolution of our shareholders including
the affirmative votes of at least a majority of all issued and outstanding shares.

Under Bermuda law, the holders of an aggregate of not less than 20% in par value of a

company’s issued share capital or any class thereof have the right to apply to the Supreme Court of
Bermuda for an annulment of any amendment of the memorandum of association adopted by

91

shareholders at any general meeting, other than an amendment which alters or reduces a company’s
share capital as provided in the Companies Act. Where such an application is made, the amendment
becomes effective only to the extent that it is confirmed by the Bermuda court. An application for
an annulment of an amendment of the memorandum of association must be made within twenty-one
days after the date on which the resolution altering the company’s memorandum of association is
passed and may be made on behalf of persons entitled to make the application by one or more of
their number as they may appoint in writing for the purpose. No application may be made by
shareholders voting in favor of the amendment.

Amalgamations, Mergers and Business Combinations

The amalgamation of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation (other than
certain affiliated companies) requires the amalgamation agreement to be approved by the company’s
board of directors and by its shareholders. Unless the company’s bye-laws provide otherwise, the
approval of 75% of the shareholders voting at such meeting is required to approve the
amalgamation agreement, and the quorum for such meeting must be two persons holding or
representing more than one-third of the issued shares of the company. Our bye-laws provide that a
merger or an amalgamation must only be approved by the affirmative votes of a majority of the
votes attaching to all issued and outstanding shares entitling the shareholder to vote on such
resolutions.

Under Bermuda law, in the event of an amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with

another company or corporation, a shareholder of the Bermuda company who did not vote in favor
of the amalgamation or merger and who is not satisfied that fair value has been offered for such
shareholder’s shares may, within one month of notice of the shareholders’ meeting, apply to the
Supreme Court of Bermuda to appraise the fair value of those shares.

Shareholder Suits

Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under Bermuda

law. The Bermuda courts, however, would ordinarily be expected to permit a shareholder to
commence an action in the name of a company to remedy a wrong to the company where the act
complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company or illegal, or would
result in the violation of the company’s memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore,
consideration would be given by a Bermuda court to acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud
against the minority shareholders or, for instance, where an act requires the approval of a greater
percentage of the company’s shareholders than that which actually approved it.

When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner that is oppressive or

prejudicial to the interests of some part of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to
the Supreme Court of Bermuda, which may make such order as it sees fit, including an order
regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future or ordering the purchase of the shares
of any shareholders by other shareholders or by the company.

Our bye-laws contain a provision which provides that in the event any dispute arises concerning

the Companies Act or out of our bye-laws, including whether there has been a breach of the
Companies Act or our bye-laws by an officer or director, any such dispute shall be subject to the
exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Bermuda. In addition, our bye-laws contain a
provision by virtue of which our shareholders waive any claim or right of action that they have, both
individually and on our behalf, against any director or officer in relation to any action or failure to
take action by such director or officer, except in respect of any fraud or dishonesty of such director
or officer.

Capitalization of Profits and Reserves

Pursuant to our bye-laws, our board of directors may (i) capitalize any part of the amount of

our share premium or other reserve accounts or any amount credited to our profit and loss account
or otherwise available for distribution by applying such sum in paying up unissued shares to be

92

allotted as fully paid bonus shares pro rata (except in connection with the conversion of shares) to
the shareholders; or (ii) capitalize any sum standing to the credit of a reserve account or sums
otherwise available for dividend or distribution by paying up in full, partly paid or nil paid shares of
those shareholders who would have been entitled to such sums if they were distributed by way of
dividend or distribution.

Calls on Shares and Forfeiture

In the event of any issuance by the Company of shares that are not fully paid, our board of
directors may make such calls as it thinks fit upon the holders of such partly paid shares in respect
of any amounts unpaid on such shares (and not made payable at fixed times by the terms and
conditions of issue). If a call on partly paid shares is not paid on or before the day appointed for
payment thereof, the holder of such shares may at the discretion of our board of directors be liable
to pay the Company interest on the amount of such call and our board of directors may direct the
secretary of the Company to forward such shareholder a notice in writing demanding payment. If
the requirements of such notice are not complied with, any such share may at any time thereafter,
until the payment of all amounts due, be forfeited by a resolution of our board of directors to that
effect, and such share shall thereupon become the property of the Company and may be disposed of
as our board of directors shall determine.

Untraced Shareholders

Our bye-laws provide that our board of directors may forfeit any dividend or other monies

payable in respect of any shares that remain unclaimed for six years from the date when such
monies became due for payment. In addition, we are entitled to cease sending dividend warrants and
checks by post or otherwise to a shareholder if such instruments have been returned undelivered to,
or left uncashed by, such shareholder on at least two consecutive occasions or, following one such
occasion, reasonable enquires have failed to establish the shareholder’s new address. This entitlement
ceases if the shareholder claims a dividend or cashes a dividend check or a warrant.

Certain Provisions of Bermuda Law

We have been designated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as a non-resident for Bermuda
exchange control purposes. This designation allows us to engage in transactions in currencies other
than the Bermuda dollar, and there are no exchange control restrictions on our ability to transfer
funds (other than funds denominated in Bermuda dollars) in and out of Bermuda or to pay
dividends to U.S. residents who are holders of our common shares.

The Bermuda Monetary Authority has given its consent for the issue and free transferability of

all our common shares to and between non-residents of Bermuda for exchange control purposes,
provided that our shares remain listed on an appointed stock exchange, which includes the NYSE.
Approvals or permissions given by the Bermuda Monetary Authority do not constitute a guarantee
by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as to our performance or our creditworthiness. Accordingly, in
giving such consent or permissions, the Bermuda Monetary Authority shall not be liable for the
financial soundness, performance or default of our business or for the correctness of any opinions or
statements expressed in this annual report. Certain issues and transfers of common shares involving
persons deemed resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes require the specific consent of
the Bermuda Monetary Authority.

In accordance with Bermuda law, share certificates are only issued in the names of companies,
partnerships or individuals. In the case of a shareholder acting in a special capacity (for example as
a trustee), certificates may, at the request of the shareholder, record the capacity in which the
shareholder is acting. Notwithstanding such recording of any special capacity, we are not bound to
investigate or see to the execution of any such trust. We will take no notice of any trust applicable
to any of our shares, whether or not we have been notified of such trust.

93

C. Material Contracts

The following is a summary of each material contract that we have entered into outside the

ordinary course of business during the two-year period immediately preceding the date of this
annual report. Such summaries are not intended to be complete and reference is made to the
contracts themselves, which are exhibits to this annual report.

(a) Registration Rights Agreement among GasLog Ltd. and the shareholders named therein,
dated as of April 4, 2012; please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Registration Rights Agreement”.

(b) Facilities Agreement dated March 14, 2012, relating to $272,500,000 loan facilities among

GAS-three Ltd. and GAS-four Ltd. as borrowers, DnB Bank ASA and the Export-Import
Bank of Korea as mandated lead arrangers, the financial institutions listed in Schedule I
thereto as lenders and DnB Bank ASA as hedging provider, bookrunner, agent and security
agent. For a description of the Facilities Agreement; please see “Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities”.

(c) Loan Agreement dated October 3, 2011, relating to a facility of up to $277,000,000 among
GAS-five Ltd. and GAS-six Ltd. as joint and several borrowers, the banks and financial
institutions listed in Schedule 1 thereto as lenders, Nordea Bank Finland Plc, London
Branch, ABN Amro Bank N.V. and Citibank International Plc., Greece Branch as joint lead
arrangers, the banks and financial institutions listed in Schedule 2 thereto as swap banks
and Nordea Bank Finland plc, London Branch as agent and security trustee; please see
“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital
Resources—Credit Facilities”.

(d) Facility Agreement dated December 23, 2011, relating to a $435,000,000 loan facility among

GAS-eight Ltd., GAS-nine Ltd. and GAS-ten Ltd. as borrowers, DnB Bank ASA,
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Danish Ship Finance A/S, ING Bank N.V. and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) as mandated lead arrangers, the financial
institutions listed in Schedule 1 thereto as lenders, the financial institutions listed in
Schedule 1 thereto as hedging providers and DnB Bank ASA as bookrunner, agent and
security agent; please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B.
Liquidity and Capital Resources—Credit Facilities”.

(e) Master Time Charter Party among GAS-one Ltd., GAS-two Ltd., GAS-three Ltd., GAS-

four Ltd., GAS-five Ltd., GAS-six Ltd. and Methane Services Limited, dated May 9, 2011;
please see “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Ship Time
Charters”.

(f) Appendix to the Private Agreement of Professional Hiring (English translation), dated

December 1, 2010 and October 1, 2011, between Nea Dimitra Ktimatikh Kai Emporikh S.A.
and GasLog LNG Services Ltd.; please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Office Space and Related Arrangements”.

(g) Form of Indemnification Agreement for the Company’s directors and certain officers; please

see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—B. Related Party
Transactions—Indemnification Agreements”.

(h) Restrictive Covenant Agreement among GasLog Ltd., Peter G. Livanos and Blenheim

Holdings Ltd., dated April 4, 2012; please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related
Party Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Restrictive Covenant Agreement”.

(i) Form of Subscription Agreement; please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party

Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions—Subscription Agreement”.

(j) GasLog Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan; please see “Item 6. Directors,

Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Senior
Management—Equity Compensation Plans”.

94

D. Exchange Controls and Other Limitations Affecting Security Holders

Under Bermuda law, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital,
including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or
other payments to non-resident holders of our common shares.

We have been designated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority as a non-resident for Bermuda
exchange control purposes. This designation allows us to engage in transactions in currencies other
than the Bermuda dollar, and there are no exchange control restrictions on our ability to transfer
funds (other than funds denominated in Bermuda dollars) in and out of Bermuda or to pay
dividends to U.S. residents who are holders of our common shares.

Under Bermuda law, “exempted” companies are companies formed for the purpose of
conducting business outside Bermuda from a principal place of business in Bermuda. As an
exempted company, we may not, without a license or consent granted by the Minister of Finance,
participate in certain business transactions, including transactions involving Bermuda landholding
rights and the carrying on of business of any kind, for which we are not licensed in Bermuda.

E. Tax Considerations

Bermuda Tax Considerations

The following discussion represents the opinion of Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited regarding

the material Bermuda tax consequences to us of our activities and, subject to the limitations
described above, to you as a holder of our common shares. At the present time, there is no
Bermuda income or profits tax, withholding tax, capital gains tax, capital transfer tax, estate duty or
inheritance tax payable by us or by our shareholders in respect of our shares. We have obtained an
assurance from the Minister of Finance of Bermuda under the Exempted Undertakings Tax
Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda, as amended, that, in the event that any legislation is enacted in
Bermuda imposing any tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain
or appreciation or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, such tax shall not, until
March 31, 2035, be applicable to us or to any of our operations or to our shares, debentures or
other obligations except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or is
payable by us in respect of real property owned or leased by us in Bermuda. Given the limited
duration of the Bermuda Minister of Finance’s assurance, we cannot assure you that we will not be
subject to any Bermuda tax after March 31, 2035.

United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following discussion represents the opinion of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP regarding the
material U.S. Federal income tax consequences to us of our activities and, subject to the limitations
described above, to you as a holder of our common shares.

The following discussion of U.S. Federal income tax matters is based on the Code, judicial
decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This
discussion does not address any U.S. state or local taxes. You are encouraged to consult your own
tax advisor regarding the particular U.S. Federal, state and local and foreign income and other tax
consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our common shares that may be applicable to
you.

U.S. Taxation of Our Operating Income

Our subsidiaries have elected (or are in the process of electing) to be treated as disregarded
entities for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. As a result, for purposes of the discussion below, our
subsidiaries are treated as branches rather than as separate corporations.

95

U.S. Taxation of Shipping Income

Subject to the discussion of “effectively connected” income below, unless we are exempt from

U.S. Federal income tax under the rules contained in Section 883 of the Code, we will be subject to
U.S. Federal income tax under the rules of Section 887 of the Code, which would impose on us a
4% U.S. income tax in respect of our U.S. source gross transportation income (without the
allowance for deductions).

For this purpose, U.S. source gross transportation income includes 50% of the shipping income
that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends (but that does not both begin and end) in
the United States. Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports
is generally not subject to any U.S. income tax.

For this purpose, “shipping income” means income that is derived from:

(i) the use of ships;

(ii) the hiring or leasing of ships for use on a time, operating or bareboat charter basis;

(iii) the participation in a pool, partnership, strategic alliance, joint operating agreement or

other joint venture we directly or indirectly own or participate in that generates such
income; or

(iv) the performance of services directly related to those uses.

Under Section 883 of the Code and the regulations thereunder, we will be exempt from U.S.

Federal income tax on our U.S. source gross transportation income if:

(i) we are organized in a foreign country (the “country of organization”) that grants an

“equivalent exemption” to corporations organized in the United States; and

(ii) either

(a) more than 50% of the value of our shares is owned, directly or indirectly, by

individuals who are “residents” of our country of organization or of another foreign
country that grants an equivalent exemption to corporations organized in the United
States (the “50% Ownership Test”), or

(b) our common shares are “primarily and regularly traded on an established securities

market” in our country of organization, in another country that grants an equivalent
exemption to U.S. corporations, or in the United States (the “Publicly-Traded Test”).

Bermuda, the jurisdiction in which we are incorporated, grants an equivalent exemption to U.S.

corporations. Therefore, we will be eligible for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code if we
satisfy either the 50% Ownership Test or the Publicly-Traded Test. Although we have satisfied the
50% Ownership Test in the past, it may be difficult or impossible for us to establish that we satisfy
the 50% Ownership Test because our common shares will be traded on the NYSE and will be
widely held.

As to the Publicly-Traded Test, the regulations under Section 883 of the Code provide, in
pertinent part, that stock of a foreign corporation will be considered to be “primarily traded” on an
established securities market in a country if the number of shares of each class of stock that is
traded during any taxable year on all established securities markets in that country exceeds the
number of shares in each such class that is traded during that year on established securities markets
in any other single country. We believe that our common shares, which are, and will continue to be,
the sole class of our issued and outstanding stock, is, and will continue to be, “primarily traded” on
NYSE, which is an established securities market for these purposes.

The Publicly-Traded Test also requires our common shares to be “regularly traded” on an
established securities market. Since our common shares, listed on the NYSE, are our only class of
outstanding stock, this test will be satisfied if (i) our common shares are traded on the market, other
than in minimal quantities, on at least 60 days during the taxable year (or 1/6 of the days in a short
taxable year); and (ii) the aggregate number of shares of our common shares traded on such market
during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of shares of our common shares
outstanding during such year (as appropriately adjusted in the case of a short taxable year). We

96

believe we satisfy, and will continue to satisfy, the trading frequency and trading volume tests.
However, even if we do not satisfy both tests, these tests are deemed satisfied if our common shares
are traded on an established securities market in the United States and are regularly quoted by
dealers making a market in such shares. We believe this is and will continue to be the case.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we will satisfy the Publicly-Traded Test only if we can establish
that among the group of persons who each own, either actually or constructively under certain stock
attribution rules, 5% or more of our common shares, or “5% Shareholders”, there are sufficient
“qualified shareholders” to demonstrate that non-qualified 5% Shareholders cannot own 50% or
more of our common shares for more than half the number of days during the taxable year. In
order to satisfy this requirement, a sufficient number of 5% Shareholders must verify that they are
qualified shareholders by providing certain information to us, including information about their
countries of residence for tax purposes and their actual and/or constructive ownership of our
common shares. We do not currently satisfy the foregoing requirements of the Publicly Traded Test.

We are currently not entitled to this exemption under Section 883 for any taxable year. As a

result, we are subject to the 4% U.S. Federal income tax under Section 887 on our U.S. source
gross transportation income (subject to the discussion of “effectively connected income” below).

Because we are unable to qualify for the exemption under Section 883, our U.S. source gross
transportation income that is considered to be “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S.
trade or business is subject to the U.S. corporate income tax currently imposed at rates of up to
35% (net of applicable deductions). In addition, we may be subject to the 30% U.S. “branch profits”
tax on earnings effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, as determined after
allowance for certain adjustments, and on certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the
conduct of our U.S. trade or business.

Our U.S. source gross transportation income would be considered effectively connected with the

conduct of a U.S. trade or business only if:

(i) we had, or were considered to have, a fixed place of business in the United States involved

in the earning of U.S. source gross transportation income; and

(ii) substantially all of our U.S. source gross transportation income was attributable to regularly
scheduled transportation, such as the operation of a ship that followed a published schedule
with repeated sailings at regular intervals between the same points for voyages that begin or
end in the United States.

We believe that we will not meet these conditions because we will not have, or permit

circumstances that would result in having, such a fixed place of business in the United States or any
ship sailing to or from the United States on a regularly scheduled basis.

In addition, income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States

is not subject to the tax rules described above. Such income is subject to either a 30% gross-basis
tax or to U.S. corporate income tax on net income at rates of up to 35% (and the branch profits tax
discussed above). Although there can be no assurance, we do not expect to engage in transportation
that produces shipping income of this type.

Taxation of Gain on Sale of Shipping Assets

Regardless of whether we qualify for the exemption under Section 883 of the Code, we will not

be subject to U.S. income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of a ship, provided the
sale is considered to occur outside of the United States (as determined under U.S. tax principles). In
general, a sale of a ship will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if
title to the ship (and risk of loss with respect to the ship) passes to the buyer outside of the United
States. We expect that any sale of a ship will be so structured that it will be considered to occur
outside of the United States.

97

Taxation of United States Holders

You are a “U.S. holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares and you are a
U.S. citizen or resident, a U.S. corporation (or other U.S. entity taxable as a corporation), an estate
the income of which is subject to U.S. Federal income taxation regardless of its source, or a trust if
a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of
the trust and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the
trust.

If a partnership holds our common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend

upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a
partnership holding our common shares, you should consult your tax advisor.

Distributions on Our Common Shares

Subject to the discussion of “passive foreign investment companies”, or “PFICs”, below, any
distributions with respect to our common shares that you receive from us generally will constitute
dividends to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under
U.S. tax principles). Distributions in excess of our earnings and profits will be treated first as a
nontaxable return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our common shares (on a dollar-for-
dollar basis) and thereafter as capital gain.

Because we are not a U.S. corporation, if you are a U.S. corporation (or a U.S. entity taxable
as a corporation), you will not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to
any distributions you receive from us.

Dividends paid with respect to our common shares will generally be treated as “passive category
income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

If you are an individual, trust or estate, dividends you receive from us should be treated as
“qualified dividend income” taxed at a maximum preferential rate of 15% or 20%, depending on the
income level of the individual, provided that:

(i) our common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United

States (such as the NYSE);

(ii) we are not a PFIC for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the

immediately preceding taxable year (see the discussion below under “—PFIC Status and
Significant Tax Consequences”);

(iii) you own our common shares for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60

days before the date on which the common shares become ex-dividend;

(iv) you are not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in

substantially similar or related property; and

(v) certain other conditions are met.

Special rules may apply to any “extraordinary dividend”. Generally, an extraordinary dividend is

a dividend in an amount that is equal to (or in excess of) 10% of your adjusted tax basis (or fair
market value in certain circumstances) in a share of our common shares. If we pay an extraordinary
dividend on our common shares that is treated as qualified dividend income and if you are an
individual, estate or trust, then any loss derived by you from a subsequent sale or exchange of such
common shares will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent of such dividend.

There is no assurance that dividends you receive from us will be eligible for the preferential tax
rates applicable to qualified dividend income. Dividends you receive from us that are not eligible for
the preferential tax rates will be taxed at ordinary income rates.

In addition, even if we are not a PFIC, under proposed legislation, dividends of a corporation
incorporated in a country without a “comprehensive income tax system” paid to U.S. holders who
are individuals, estates or trusts would not be eligible for the 15% or 20% maximum tax rate.
Although the term “comprehensive income tax system” is not defined in the proposed legislation, we
believe this rule would apply to us because we are incorporated in Bermuda. As of the date hereof,

98

it is not possible to predict with certainty whether or in what form this proposed legislation will be
enacted.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Shares

Provided that we are not a PFIC for any taxable year, you generally will recognize taxable gain
or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares in an amount equal to the
difference between the amount realized by you from such sale, exchange or other disposition and
your tax basis in such shares. Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if
your holding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition.
Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S. source income or loss, as applicable, for
U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Your ability to deduct capital losses against ordinary income is
subject to limitations.

Unearned Income Medicare Contribution Tax

Each U.S. holder who is an individual, estate or trust is generally subject to a 3.8% Medicare
tax on the lesser of (i) such U.S. holder’s “net investment income” for the relevant taxable year, and
(ii) the excess of such U.S. holder’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a
certain threshold (which in the case of individuals will be between $125,000 and $250,000, depending
on the individual’s circumstances). For this purpose, net investment income generally includes
dividends on and capital gains from the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares,
subject to certain exceptions. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the
applicability of the Medicare tax to your income and gains from your ownership of our common
shares.

PFIC Status and Significant Tax Consequences

In General

Special U.S. income tax rules apply to you if you hold shares in a non-U.S. corporation that is
classified as a PFIC for U.S. income tax purposes. In general, under Section 1297 of the Code, we
will be treated as a PFIC in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules,
either:

(i) at least 75% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of “passive income” (e.g.,
dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a
rental business); or

(ii) at least 50% of the average value of our assets during such taxable year consists of “passive

assets” (i.e., assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income).

Income we earn, or are deemed to earn, in connection with the performance of services will not
constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income will generally constitute passive income (unless
we are treated under certain special rules as deriving our rental income in the active conduct of a
trade or business).

There are legal uncertainties involved in determining whether the income derived from time
chartering activities constitutes rental income or income derived from the performance of services. In
Tidewater Inc. v. United States, 565 F.2d 299 (5th Cir. 2009), the Fifth Circuit held that income
derived from certain time chartering activities should be treated as rental income rather than
services income for purposes of a provision of the Code relating to foreign sales corporations. In
recently published guidance, however, the IRS stated that it disagreed with the holding in Tidewater,
and specified that time charters should be treated as service contracts. Since we have chartered all
our ships to unrelated charterers on the basis of time charters and since we expect to continue to do
so, we believe that we are not a PFIC. We have received an opinion from our counsel, Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP, that (i) the income we receive from time chartering activities and assets
engaged in generating such income should not be treated as passive income or assets, respectively,
and (ii) for the taxable year during which our initial public offering occurred and each taxable year

99

thereafter, we should not be a PFIC. This opinion is based and its accuracy is conditioned on
representations, valuations and projections provided by us regarding the nature of our assets, income
and charters to our counsel. While we believe these representations, valuations and projections to be
accurate, the shipping market is volatile and no assurance can be given that they will continue to be
accurate. Moreover, we have not sought, and we do not expect to seek, an IRS ruling on this
matter. As a result, the IRS or a court could disagree with our position. No assurance can be given
that this result will not occur. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs in a manner to
avoid, to the extent possible, being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot
assure you that the nature of our operations will not change in the future, or that we can avoid
PFIC status in the future.

If we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, you generally would be subject to one
of three different U.S. Federal income tax regimes, as discussed below, depending on whether or not
you make certain elections. Additionally, starting in 2013, for each year during which you own our
common shares, we are a PFIC and the total value of all PFIC stock that you directly or indirectly
own exceeds certain thresholds, you will be required to file IRS Form 8621 with your U.S. Federal
income tax return to report your ownership of our common shares.

Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make a Timely QEF Election

If we were a PFIC and if you make a timely election to treat us as a “Qualifying Electing
Fund” for U.S. tax purposes (a “QEF Election”), you would be required to report each year your
pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and our net capital gain for our taxable year that ends with
or within your taxable year, regardless of whether we make any distributions to you. Such income
inclusions would not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income
(as discussed above under “Taxation of United States Holders—Distributions on Our Common
Shares”). Your adjusted tax basis in our common shares would be increased to reflect such taxed
but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that had previously been
taxed would result in a corresponding reduction in your adjusted tax basis in our common shares
and would not be taxed again once distributed. You generally would recognize capital gain or loss
on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares. Even if you make a QEF Election
for one of our taxable years, if we were a PFIC for a prior taxable year during which you held our
common shares and for which you did not make a timely QEF Election, you would also be subject
to a more adverse regime described below under “—Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make No
Election”.

You would make a QEF Election by completing and filing IRS Form 8621 with your U.S.
income tax return for the year for which the election is made in accordance with the relevant
instructions. If we were to become aware that we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year,
we would notify all U.S. holders of such treatment and would provide all necessary information to
any U.S. holder who requests such information in order to make the QEF Election described above
with respect to us.

Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make a Timely “Mark-to-Market” Election

Alternatively, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and, as we believe, our

common shares are treated as “marketable stock”, you would be allowed to make a “mark-to-
market” election with respect to our common shares, provided you complete and file IRS Form 8621
with your U.S. income tax return for the year for which the election is made in accordance with the
relevant instructions. If that election is made, you generally would include as ordinary income in
each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of our common shares at the end of
the taxable year over your adjusted tax basis in our common shares. You also would be permitted
an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of your adjusted tax basis in our common shares
over its fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount
previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election). Your tax basis in our
common shares would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the
sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares would be treated as ordinary income, and

100

any loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common shares would be treated
as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously
included by you.

Taxation of U.S. Holders That Make No Election

Finally, if we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and if you did not make either a
QEF Election or a mark-to-market election for that year, you would be subject to special rules with
respect to (i) any excess distribution (that is, the portion of any distributions received by you on our
common shares in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by
you in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, your holding period for our common shares)
and (ii) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares. Under
these special rules:

(i) the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over your aggregate holding

period for our common shares;

(ii) the amount allocated to the current taxable year would be taxed as ordinary income; and

(iii) the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the

highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of taxpayer for that year, and an
interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the
resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.

United States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. Holders

You are a “non-U.S. holder” if you are a beneficial owner of our common shares (other than a

partnership for U.S. tax purposes) and you are not a U.S. holder.

Distributions on Our Common Shares

You generally will not be subject to U.S. income or withholding taxes on a distribution received

from us with respect to our common shares, unless the income arising from such distribution is
effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If you are
entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to that income, that income
generally is taxable in the United States only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment
maintained by you in the United States.

Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common Shares

You generally will not be subject to U.S. income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized

upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common shares, unless:

(i) the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United

States. If you are entitled to the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty with respect to
that gain, that gain generally is taxable in the United States only if it is attributable to a
permanent establishment maintained by you in the United States; or

(ii) you are an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the

taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met.

Gain that is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States

(or so treated) generally will be subject to U.S. Federal income tax (net of certain deductions) at
regular U.S. Federal income tax rates. If you are a corporate non-U.S. holder, your earnings and
profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income (subject to certain adjustments) may
be subject to an additional U.S. branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable tax treaty).

101

United States Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

In General

In general, if you are a non-corporate U.S. holder, dividend payments (or other taxable
distributions) made within the United States will be subject to information reporting requirements
and backup withholding tax if you:

(i) fail to provide us with an accurate taxpayer identification number;

(ii) are notified by the IRS that you have failed to report all interest or dividends required to

be shown on your Federal income tax returns; or

(iii) in certain circumstances, fail to comply with applicable certification requirements.

If you are a non-U.S. holder, you may be required to establish your exemption from
information reporting and backup withholding by certifying your status on IRS Form W-8BEN,
W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable.

If you sell our common shares to or through a U.S. office or broker, the payment of the sales

proceeds is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless you certify
that you are a non-U.S. person, under penalties of perjury, or you otherwise establish an exemption.
If you sell our common shares through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker and the sales
proceeds are paid to you outside the United States, then information reporting and backup
withholding generally will not apply to that payment.

However, U.S. information reporting requirements (but not backup withholding) will apply to a

payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United States, if you sell our
common shares through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is a U.S. person or has certain other
connections with the United States.

Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Rather, you generally may obtain a refund of

any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed your income tax liability by
accurately completing and timely filing a refund claim with the IRS.

Tax Return Disclosure

U.S. individuals that hold certain specified foreign financial assets (which include shares in a

foreign corporation) are subject to U.S. return disclosure obligations (and related penalties for
failure to disclose). Such U.S. individuals are required to file IRS Form 8938 with their U.S. Federal
income tax returns. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisors concerning the filing of
IRS Form 8938.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

Not applicable.

G. Statement by Experts

Not applicable.

H. Documents on Display

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the “Exchange Act”. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other
information as a foreign private issuer with the SEC. You may inspect and copy our public filings
without charge at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the
public reference room. You may obtain copies of all or any part of such materials from the SEC
upon payment of prescribed fees. You may also inspect reports and other information regarding
companies, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC without charge at a web site maintained
by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

102

I. Subsidiary Information

Not applicable.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to various market risks, including interest rate and foreign currency exchange

risks. The Group makes use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps to
maintain the desired level of exposure arising from these risks.

A discussion of our accounting policies for derivative financial instruments is included in Note 2

to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Further
information on our exposure to market risk is included in Note 20 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

The following analyses provide quantitative information regarding our exposure to market risks.

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to market risks relating to changes in interest rates because we, through our
subsidiaries, have floating rate debt outstanding. Significant increases in interest rates could adversely
affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to service our debt. From time to
time, we have used interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in
interest rates. The principal objective of these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs associated
with our floating rate debt and is not for speculative or trading purposes. We expect to continue to
use interest rate swaps in the future as we deem appropriate to manage our exposure to interest rate
risk.

The aggregate principal amount of our outstanding floating rate debt as of December 31, 2013

was $1.06 billion. As an indication of the extent of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, an
increase in LIBOR by 10 basis points would have decreased our profit during the years ended
December 31, 2013 and 2012 by approximately 0.39% or $0.22 million and 2.82% or $0.12 million,
respectively, based upon our debt level during such years.

We expect our exposure to interest rate changes to increase in the future as a result of an
increase in our borrowings under our current and future loan agreements. Borrowings under these
floating rate debt facilities will be used to finance a portion of the contract prices of our
newbuildings on order.

Interest Rate Swaps

The principal terms of the interest rate swaps are disclosed in Note 21 to our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012,
the notional amount of the swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments was $307.43 million
and $719.90 million, respectively, and the notional amount of the swaps held for trading was $630.19
million and $143.00 million, respectively.

Under these swap transactions, the bank counterparty effects quarterly floating-rate payments to

the Company for the relevant amount based on the three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and the
Company effects quarterly payments to the bank on the relevant amount at the respective fixed
rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We generate all of our revenue in U.S. dollars, and the majority of our expenses, including debt

repayment obligations under our credit facilities and a portion of our administrative expenses, are
denominated in U.S. dollars. However, a portion of the ship operating expenses of our vessel
ownership segment, primarily crew wages, and a large portion of our administrative expenses, are
denominated in euros. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately $12.99 million and $6.14
million, respectively, of our outstanding liabilities were denominated in euros.

103

Depreciation in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro will increase the U.S. dollar

cost of us paying expenses denominated in euros. Accordingly, there is a risk that currency
fluctuations will have a negative effect on our cash flows. As an indication of the extent of our
sensitivity to changes in exchange rate, a 10% increase in the average euro/dollar exchange rate
would have decreased our profit and cash flows during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
by approximately $4.12 million and $2.65 million, respectively, based upon our expenses during such
years. We do not currently hedge movements in currency exchange rates, but our management
monitors exchange rate fluctuations on a continuous basis. We may seek to hedge this currency
fluctuation risk in the future. We expect our exposure to movements in currency exchange rates to
increase in the future as our fleet increases.

Inflation and Cost Increases

We do not expect inflation to have a significant impact on us in the current economic
environment and foreseeable future, other than potentially in relation to crew costs. LNG
transportation is a specialized area and the number of LNG carriers has increased rapidly in recent
years. As a result, there has been an increased demand for qualified crews, which has and will
continue to put inflationary pressure on crew costs. The impact of cost increases would be mitigated
to some extent by certain provisions in our time charters, including review provisions and cost pass-
through provisions.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.

104

PART II

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

There has been no material default in the payment of principal, interest, sinking or purchase
fund installments or any other material default relating to the Group’s debt. There have been no
arrears in payment of dividends on, or material delinquency with respect to, any class of preference
shares of the Group.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND
USE OF PROCEEDS

In May 2013, our board of directors and our shareholders approved certain amendments to our

bye-laws authorizing the board of directors to designate from time to time one or more series of
preference shares. The description of our bye-laws in “Item 10—Additional Information—B.
Memorandum and Articles of Association” reflect these amendments.

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial

Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December
31, 2013. Based on our evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013.

B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act and
for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
controls over financial reporting are designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of our financial statements in accordance with IFRS,
and that our receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of our
management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal controls over financial reporting, misstatements

may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk
that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over

financial reporting using criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992 framework).
Based on the evaluation, our management concluded that our internal controls over financial
reporting are effective as of December 31, 2013.

105

C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

An attestation report of our registered public accounting firm is not required as we qualify as

an emerging growth company under section 3(a) of the Exchange Act (as amended by the JOBS
Act, enacted on April 5, 2012), and are therefore exempt from the attestation requirement.

D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this annual report, we have made no changes to our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 16. [RESERVED]

ITEM 16.A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Paul J. Collins, whose biographical details are included in “Item 6. Directors, Senior
Management and Employees—A. Directors and Senior Management”, qualifies as an “audit
committee financial expert”. Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that Mr. Collins
meets the definition of “independent director” for purposes of serving on an audit committee under
applicable SEC and NYSE rules.

ITEM 16.B. CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all directors, officers, employees

and agents of the Company, a copy of which is posted on our website and may be viewed at
http://www.gaslogltd.com. We will also provide a paper copy of this document upon the written
request of a shareholders at no cost. Shareholders may direct their requests to the attention of our
Head of Legal, Line Køhler Ljungdahl, c/o GasLog Monaco S.A.M., Gildo Pastor Center, 7 Rue du
Gabian, MC 98000, Monaco. No waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics have been
granted to any person during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 16.C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A., an independent registered public accounting

firm, has audited our annual financial statements acting as our independent auditor for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012.

The chart below sets forth the total amount billed and accrued for Deloitte Hadjipavlou,
Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. services performed in 2012 and 2013 and breaks down these amounts by
the category of service. The fees paid to our principal accountant were approved in accordance with
the pre-approval policies and procedures described below.

Audit fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit-related fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013
2012
(Expressed in millions
of U.S. Dollars)

$0.83
0.02
—

$0.85

$0.87
0.01
0.04

$0.92

Audit Fees

Audit fees represent compensation for professional services rendered for the audit of the
consolidated financial statements of the Company and the audit of the financial statements for its
individual subsidiary companies, fees for the review of the quarterly financial information, as well as
in connection with the review of registration statements and related consents and comfort letters,
and any other services required for SEC or other regulatory filings.

106

Included in 2012 are fees incurred relating to our Registration Statement on Form F-1
(Registration Statement No. 333-179034). Included in 2013 are fees incurred relating to our
Registration Statement on Form F-3 (Registration Statement No. 333-188817), and fees related to
the first confidential submission to the SEC of a registration statement on Form F-1 for an initial
public offering of units in a MLP formed to own certain of our LNG carriers and the audit of the
related combined financial statements.

Tax Fees

Tax fees relate to services provided in connection U.S. corporate tax filings and tax advisory

services.

Audit-related Fees

Audit-related fees for 2013 relate to the provision of certain internal control consulting services

relating to the Company’s readiness project in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. No audit-
related fees were billed in 2012.

All Other Fees

No other fees were billed by our principal accountant in 2012 and 2013.

Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation (subject to

any required shareholder approval or authorization), retention and oversight of the work of the
independent auditors. The Audit and Risk committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving
in advance the retention of the independent auditors for the performance of all audit and lawfully
permitted non-audit services. The chairman of the audit committee has authority to approve in
advance any lawfully permitted non-audit services and fees of an amount above $25,000. The entire
Audit and Risk Committee shall approve in advance any lawfully permitted non-audit services and
fees of an amount above $100,000.

ITEM 16.D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

None.

ITEM 16.E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED
PURCHASERS

None.

ITEM 16.F. CHANGE IN COMPANY’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

On March 25 and 26, 2014, our audit committee and board of directors, respectively, approved

the engagement of Deloitte LLP to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014, following the expiration of the term of engagement of Deloitte Hadjipavlou,
Sofianos & Cambanis S.A., subject to the approval of our shareholders at the 2014 annual general
meeting.

Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.’s reports on the consolidated financial

statements of GasLog Ltd. and its subsidiaries, or the “Group”, for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2013 and 2012 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not
qualified or modified as to uncertainty or audit scope.

We and Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. did not, during the two most recent

fiscal years and the subsequent period through March 26, 2014, have any disagreements on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or
procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis

107

S.A., would have caused Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. to make reference to the
matter in its reports on our financial statements; and there were no reportable events as the term is
described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

We have requested that Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. furnish a letter
addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether or not Deloitte Hadjipavlou,
Sofianos & Cambanis S.A. agrees with the statements in this report. A copy of such letter dated
March 27, 2014 is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this report.

At no time during the two most recent fiscal years or the subsequent period through March 26,

2014 did we consult with Deloitte LLP regarding the application of accounting principles to a
specific completed or proposed transaction, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on
the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 16.G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Statement of Significant Differences Between Our Corporate Governance Practices and the New
York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Standards for U.S. Non-Controlled Issuers

Overview

Pursuant to certain exceptions for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with

certain of the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the New York
Stock Exchange listing standards. However, pursuant to Section 303.A.11 of the New York Stock
Exchange Listed Company Manual and the requirements of Form 20-F, we are required to state any
significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the practices required by
the New York Stock Exchange. We believe that our established practices in the area of corporate
governance are in line with the spirit of the New York Stock Exchange standards and provide
adequate protection to our shareholders. The significant differences between our corporate
governance practices and the New York Stock Exchange standards applicable to listed U.S.
companies are set forth below.

Corporate Governance, Nominating and Compensation Committee

Pursuant to NYSE Rules 303A.04 and 303A.05, the New York Stock Exchange requires that a

listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee and a compensation
committee, each composed entirely of independent directors. As permitted under Bermuda law, we
have one or more non-independent directors serving as committee members on our compensation
committee and our corporate governance and nominating committee.

NYSE Rules 303A.02 and 303A.05 contain independence requirements for compensation
committee directors and compensation committee advisers for U.S. listed companies, as required by
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Bermuda law does not
have similar requirements, therefore we may not adhere to these new requirements.

ITEM 16.H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

108

PART III

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reference is made to pages F-1 through F-44 included herein by reference.

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.

Description

1.1

1.2

1.3

2.1

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

Amended Memorandum of Association of GasLog Ltd.(1)

Bye-laws of GasLog Ltd.(1)

Amendment to the Bye-laws of GasLog Ltd.(2)

Specimen Share Certificate(1)

Form of Registration Rights Agreement(1)

Facilities Agreement dated March 14, 2012, relating to $272,500,000 loan facilities among
GAS-three Ltd. and GAS-four Ltd. as borrowers, DnB Bank ASA and the Export-
Import Bank of Korea as mandated lead arrangers, the financial institutions listed in
Schedule I thereto as lenders and DnB Bank ASA as hedging provider, bookrunner,
agent and security agent(1)*

Loan Agreement dated October 3, 2011, relating to a facility of up to $277,000,000
among GAS-five Ltd. and GAS-six Ltd. as joint and several borrowers, the banks and
financial institutions listed in Schedule 1 thereto as lenders, Nordea Bank Finland Plc,
London Branch, ABN Amro Bank N.V. and Citibank International Plc., Greece Branch
as joint lead arrangers, the banks and financial institutions listed in Schedule 2 thereto
as swap banks and Nordea Bank Finland plc, London Branch as agent and security
trustee(1)

Facility Agreement dated December 23, 2011, relating to a $435,000,000 loan facility
among GAS-eight Ltd., GAS-nine Ltd. and GAS-ten Ltd. as borrowers, DnB Bank
ASA, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Danish Ship Finance A/S, ING Bank N.V. and
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) as mandated lead arrangers, the financial
institutions listed in Schedule 1 thereto as lenders, the financial institutions listed in
Schedule 1 thereto as hedging providers and DnB Bank ASA as bookrunner, agent and
security agent(1)*

Master Time Charter Party among GAS-one Ltd., GAS-two Ltd., GAS-three Ltd., GAS-
four Ltd., GAS-five Ltd., GAS-six Ltd. and Methane Services Limited, dated May 9,
2011(1)*

Appendix to the Private Agreement of Professional Hiring (English translation), dated
December 1, 2010 and October 1, 2011, between Nea Dimitra Ktimatikh Kai Emporikh
S.A. and GasLog LNG Services Ltd.(1)

Form of Indemnification Agreement for the Company’s directors and certain officers(1)

Form of Restrictive Covenant Agreement(1)

Form of Subscription Agreement

4.10

GasLog Ltd. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan(3)

8.1

12.1

12.2

List of Subsidiaries of GasLog Ltd.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of GasLog Ltd.’s Chief Executive Officer

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of GasLog Ltd.’s Chief Financial Officer

109

Exhibit No.

Description

13.1

13.2

16.1

23.1

GasLog Ltd. Certification of Paul Wogan, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

GasLog Ltd. Certification of Simon Crowe, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

Letter from Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

Consent of Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to GasLog Ltd.’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-179034), filed with the
SEC on March 16, 2012, or an amendment thereto, and hereby incorporated by reference to such Registration Statement.

(2) Previously filed as an exhibit to GasLog Ltd.’s Report on Form 6-K (File No. 001-35466), filed with the SEC on May 24,

2013, and hereby incorporated by reference to such Report.

(3) Previously filed as an exhibit to GasLog Ltd.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-187020), filed with the
SEC on March 4, 2013, or an amendment thereto, and hereby incorporated by reference to such Registration Statement.

* Confidential material has been redacted and complete exhibits have been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission.

The registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC upon request a copy of any instrument relating to long-term debt that
does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.

110

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused
this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURE

GASLOG LTD.,

By /s/ PAUL WOGAN

Name: Paul Wogan
Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 27, 2014

111

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GASLOG LTD.

Report of independent registered public accounting firm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated statements of profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and

2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2011,

2012 and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated statements of changes in equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012

and 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated statements of cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 . .
Notes to the consolidated financial statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

F-2
F-3

F-4

F-5

F-6
F-7
F-9

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of GasLog Ltd.

Hamilton, Bermuda

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of GasLog Ltd. and
its subsidiaries (the “Group”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated
statements of profit or loss, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The Group is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of GasLog Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2013, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board.

/s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

Athens, Greece

February 28, 2014

F-2

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of financial position
As of December 31, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

Assets
Non-current assets
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in associate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tangible fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vessels under construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current assets
Trade and other receivables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends receivable and due from related parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepayments and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Equity and liabilities
Equity
Share capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contributed surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Accumulated deficit)/Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity attributable to owners of the Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities
Trade accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ship management creditors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts due to related parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other payables and accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings—current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-current liabilities
Derivative financial instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings—non-current portion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total equity and liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Note

December 31,
2012
(restated) (1)

December 31,
2013

3
4

8
21
5
5

7
17

6

9
10

6
17
21
12
11

21
11

9,511,140
6,856,144
24,278,983
4,071,071
—
426,879,545
217,321,572
688,918,455

2,431,852
859,121
480,554
425,385
104,674,150
110,978,315
219,849,377
908,767,832

9,511,140
6,326,264
12,793,375
2,658,320
9,144,834
1,529,719,894
120,295,239
1,690,449,066

7,256,534
2,476,122
5,935,576
2,263,294
4,500,000
103,797,922
126,229,448
1,816,678,514

628,632
621,879,379
(11,049,090)
(8,187,530)
603,271,391

628,632
614,964,431
(3,428,313)
27,368,310
639,533,060

1,794,300
850,680
121,663
7,144,738
15,094,483
25,753,343
50,759,207

5,734,673
8,148,219
122,786
14,235,286
30,271,660
100,320,398
158,833,022

24,183,718
228,514,890
2,038,626
254,737,234
908,767,832

2,917,577
1,014,753,538
641,317
1,018,312,432
1,816,678,514

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee

Benefits adopted on January 1, 2013 (Note 2).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Consolidated statements of profit or loss
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

Revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vessel operating and supervision costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss)/gain on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Attributable to:
Owners of the Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Note

2011

23
13
5
14

15
15
21
4
1

66,470,819
(12,946,061)
(12,827,284)
(15,996,595)

24,700,879
(9,631,262)
41,679
(2,725,374)
1,311,970
24,786

2012
(restated) (1)
68,542,087
(14,646,407)
(13,064,898)
(20,380,090)

20,450,692
(11,669,562)
1,174,361
(6,783,315)
1,078,057
—

2013

157,239,696
(34,918,920)
(29,321,948)
(21,596,924)

71,401,904
(27,851,400)
410,974
11,497,718
1,470,120
—

(10,978,201)

(16,200,459)

(14,472,588)

13,722,678

4,250,233

56,929,316

14,039,651
(316,973)

4,250,233
—

56,929,316
—

13,722,678

4,250,233

56,929,316

Earnings per share—basic and diluted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24

0.36

0.07

0.91

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee

Benefits adopted on January 1, 2013 (Note 2).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Consolidated statements of comprehensive income
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

Profit for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income:
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Effective portion of changes in fair value of cash flow

hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges reclassified to
profit or loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial gain/(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Attributable to:
Owners of the Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Note

2011
(restated) (1)
13,722,678

2013

2012
(restated) (1)
4,250,233 56,929,316

21

21

(431,533) (15,992,827) 4,772,610

—
80,072

— 2,292,972
62,373

(48,404)

(351,461) (16,041,231) 7,127,955

13,371,217 (11,790,998) 64,057,271

13,688,190 (11,790,998) 64,057,271
—

(316,973)

—

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee

Benefits adopted on January 1, 2013 (Note 2).

13,371,217 (11,790,998) 64,057,271

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of changes in equity
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

controlling interest . . . . . . . .

— 18,633,122

Share
capital

Contributed
surplus

Equity-settled
employee
benefits
reserve

Other
reserves

(Accumulated
deficit)/retained
earnings

Attributable
to
owners
of the
Group

Non-
controlling
interest

Total

391,015

199,635,155
— 90,947,575

3,579,684
—

(5,395,407)
—

(26,477,414)
—

171,733,033
90,947,575

9,199,095
9,751,000

180,932,128
100,698,575

— (8,500,000)

—
—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

3,991,673
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—
—

(431,533)

80,072

(351,461)

—

—

(8,500,000)

— (8,500,000)

18,633,122

(18,633,122)

—

—
14,039,651

3,991,673
14,039,651

—
(316,973)

3,991,673
13,722,678

—

—

—

(431,533)

80,072

(351,461)

—

—

—

(431,533)

80,072

(351,461)

(351,461)

14,039,651

13,688,190

(316,973)

13,371,217

391,015

300,715,852

7,571,357

(5,746,868)

(12,437,763)

290,493,593

— 18,662,935

— (6,914,948)

237,617

309,415,540

—
—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

3,167,652
—

—

—

—

—
—

18,662,935

— 290,493,593

— 18,662,935

(6,914,948)

— (6,914,948)

309,653,157

— 309,653,157

—

—

—

—
4,250,233

3,167,652
4,250,233

—
—

3,167,652
4,250,233

— (16,041,231)

—

(16,041,231)

— (16,041,231)

— (16,041,231)

4,250,233

(11,790,998)

— (11,790,998)

628,632

621,879,379

10,739,009

(21,788,099)

(8,187,530)

603,271,391

— 603,271,391

— (6,914,948)

—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—

—

492,822
—

—

—

—

—
—

(21,373,476)

(28,288,424)

— (28,288,424)

—
56,929,316

492,822
56,929,316

492,822
—
— 56,929,316

7,127,955

—

7,127,955

—

7,127,955

7,127,955

56,929,316

64,057,271

— 64,057,271

628,632

614,964,431

11,231,831

(14,660,144)

27,368,310

639,533,060

— 639,533,060

Balance at January 1, 2011 . .
Capital contributions . . . . . . . .
Dividend declared ($0.22 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Acquisition of non-

Recognition of share based

payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit/(loss) for the year . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss

for the year (as previously
reported) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Actuarial gain adjustment

(see note 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other comprehensive loss for
the year (as restated)(1) . . . .

Total comprehensive

(loss)/income for the year .

Balance at December 31,

2011 (as restated)(1). . . . . . . .

Capital contributions . . . . . . . .
Dividend declared ($0.11 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net proceeds from initial
public offering (“IPO”)
and private placement . . . . .

Recognition of share based

payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit for the year . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss

for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total comprehensive

(loss)/income for the year .

Balance at December 31,

2012 (as restated)(1). . . . . . . .

Dividend declared ($0.45 per
share) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Recognition of share based

payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit for the year . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive

income for the year . . . . . . .

Total comprehensive income
for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at December 31,

2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits

adopted on January 1, 2013 (Note 2).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of cash flow
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Profit for the year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments for:
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized foreign exchange gains on cash and cash

equivalents and short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized loss/(gain) on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash defined benefit obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash employee benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Movements in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables

including related parties, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease/(increase) in prepayments and other assets . . . . .
Increase in inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase)/decrease in other non-current assets . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in other non-current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and other

current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash provided by operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash from operating activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from investing activities:
Dividends received from associate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for tangible fixed assets and vessels under

construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return of contributed capital from associate . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Maturity of short-term investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash transferred on disposal of subsidiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from bank loans and bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bank loan repayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of loan issuance costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of IPO costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of common shares (net of

underwriting discounts and commissions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital contributions received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash from financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash

equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-7

2011

(restated)(1)

2012
(restated)(1)

2013

13,722,678

4,250,233

56,929,316

12,827,284
(1,311,970)
(41,679)
9,631,262

—
2,725,374
(24,786)
577,196
3,991,673
42,097,032

(1,485,220)
294,098
(42,245)
(871,769)
—

(4,388,124)
35,603,772
(8,602,438)
27,001,334

13,064,898
(1,078,057)
(1,174,361)
11,669,562

(627,758)
6,783,315
—
35,844
3,481,090
36,404,766

527,620
54,692
(55,288)
(3,199,302)
10,879

2,319,528
36,062,895
(11,144,727)
24,918,168

29,321,948
(1,470,120)
(410,974)
27,851,400

(1,013,004)
(17,226,925)
—
81,396
492,822
94,555,859

(4,674,790)
(1,837,909)
(5,455,022)
1,412,751
30,043

24,304,373
108,335,305
(21,590,780)
86,744,525

1,086,787

950,000

1,640,027

(88,036,471)
500,000

(56,426)
41,679
(86,464,431)

(110,765,495)
—
— (307,914,861)
— 204,091,159
—
1,017,884
(212,621,313)

(1,038,153,383)
359,973
(44,969,200)
145,046,500
—
560,516
(935,515,567)

—
(29,880,190)
(4,757,032)
(1,275,447)

(27,454,542)
(16,221,986)
(3,515,267)

— 1,026,199,965
(142,648,971)
(14,781,775)
—

(772,000)
92,970,575
56,285,906

— 314,255,049
(6,914,948)
18,662,935
278,811,241

—
(3,177,191)
23,270,100
20,092,909

(222,690)
90,885,406
20,092,909
110,978,315

—
(28,288,424)
—
840,480,795

1,109,854
(7,180,393)
110,978,315
103,797,922

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Consolidated statements of cash flow
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Acquisition of non-controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in capital contribution in lieu of dividend payment . . . . . .
Capital expenditures–net payable/(receivable) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividends retained and deemed capital contribution relating to

employee incentive scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IPO costs included in liabilities at the end of the year . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loan issuance costs included in liabilities at the end of the year. .

2011
(restated)(1)

2012
(restated)(1)

2013

18,633,122
7,490,000
3,797,568

—
—
2,326,195

—
—
(691,226)

238,000
1,610,173
9,532,295

—
124,616
3,367,737

—
—
2,493,804

(1) Restated to account for the retrospective application of the amendments to IAS 19 Employee

Benefits adopted on January 1, 2013 (Note 2).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8

GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries

Notes to the consolidated financial statements
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013
(All amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

1. Organization and Operations

GasLog Ltd. (“GasLog”) was incorporated in Bermuda on July 16, 2003. GasLog and its
subsidiaries (the “Group”) are primarily engaged in the ownership, operation and management of
vessels in the liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) market, providing maritime services for the
transportation of LNG on a worldwide basis and LNG vessel management services. The Group
conducts its operations through its vessel-owning subsidiaries and through its vessel management
services subsidiary. The Group’s operations are carried out from offices in Piraeus, Greece, and
Monaco. The registered office of GasLog is Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11,
Bermuda. GasLog is controlled by Blenheim Holdings Ltd. (“Blenheim Holdings”), an entity
registered in Bermuda, which as of December 31, 2013, held 50.89% interest in GasLog and
accordingly, could control the outcome of matters on which stockholders are entitled to vote.
Blenheim Holdings is controlled by Ceres Shipping Ltd. (“Ceres Shipping”) an entity also registered
in Bermuda. The ultimate controlling party of the Group at December 31, 2013 was Mr. Peter G.
Livanos, who beneficially owned a 51.30% interest in GasLog principally through Ceres Shipping’s
majority ownership interest in Bleinheim Holdings Ltd. and through Falconera Navigation Inc.
(“Falconera”). Falconera is a Panama company, which may be deemed attributable to Mr. Livanos
because he is an officer and a board member of Falconera.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of GasLog

and its subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013 all subsidiaries were 100% held (either
directly or indirectly) by GasLog. As of December 31, 2013 the Group’s structure was as follows:

Name

Place of
incorporation

Date of
incorporation

Principal activities

Cargo capacity
(cbm)

Vessel

Delivery date

Subsidiaries:
GasLog Investments Ltd. BVI
GasLog Carriers Ltd. . . . . Bermuda
GasLog Shipping

Company Ltd. . . . . . . . . . Bermuda

GasLog LNG Services

July 2003
Holding company
February 2008 Holding company

January 2006

Holding company

—
—

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GasLog Monaco S.A.M. . Monaco
GAS-one Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-two Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-three Ltd.(2) . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-four Ltd.(2) . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-five Ltd.(2) . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-six Ltd.(2) . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-seven Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . Bermuda March 2011
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda March 2011
GAS-nine Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-ten Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-eleven Ltd. . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-twelve Ltd. . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-thirteen Ltd. . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-fourteen Ltd. . . . . . . . Bermuda
GAS-fifteen Ltd. . . . . . . . . . Bermuda
GasLog LNG Employee

August 2004
February 2010
February 2008 Vessel-owning company
February 2008 Vessel-owning company
Vessel-owning company
April 2010
April 2010
Vessel-owning company
February 2011 Vessel-owning company
February 2011 Vessel-owning company
Vessel-owning company
Vessel-owning company
Vessel-owning company
June 2011
June 2011
Vessel-owning company
December 2012 Vessel-owning company
December 2012 Vessel-owning company
Vessel-owning company
July 2013
Vessel-owning company
July 2013
Vessel-owning company
August 2013

Vessel management services —
—
Service company
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
155,000
174,000
174,000
174,000
174,000
153,600

—
—

—
—
GasLog Savannah May 2010
GasLog Singapore
July 2010
GasLog Shanghai
January 2013
GasLog Santiago March 2013
GasLog Sydney
GasLog Skagen
GasLog Seattle
Hull No. 2042
Hull No. 2043
Hull No. 2044
Hull No. 2072
Hull No. 2073
Hull No. 2102
Hull No. 2103
GasLog Chelsea

May 2013
July 2013
December 2013
Q2 2014(1)
Q4 2014(1)
Q1 2015(1)
Q1 2016(1)
Q2 2016(1)
Q3 2016(1)
Q4 2016(1)
October 2013

Incentive Scheme Ltd. . Bermuda

June 2008

Dormant

GasLog Shipping

Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BVI

July 2003

Dormant

—

—

—

—

—

—

Associates:
Egypt LNG Shipping

Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bermuda May 2010

Vessel-owning company

145,000

Methane Nile Eagle December 2007

(1) For newbuildings, expected delivery dates are presented.

F-9

(2) Under the agreements signed with an entity jointly-owned by the Livanos and Radziwill families

(the “Joint Venture Partner”), the Group initially held 51% in these four vessel-owning
companies. In June 2011 the Joint Venture Partner sold its 49% non-controlling interest in the
issued shares of GAS-three Ltd., GAS-four Ltd., GAS-five Ltd. and GAS-six Ltd. to Ceres
Shipping. Ceres Shipping contributed the 49% interest in the aforementioned four vessel-owning
companies to Blenheim Holdings, who in turn contributed the 49% interest in these four vessel-
owning companies to GasLog, which contributed the same to GasLog Carriers Ltd. Contribution
of these four vessel-owning companies by Ceres Shipping was a non-cash transaction for the
Group. Following the completion of this transaction, GAS-three Ltd., GAS-four Ltd., GAS-five
Ltd. and GAS-six Ltd. are 100% owned by the Group.

All entities in the Group have a December 31st year end. During 2013 the Group employed an

average of 119 employees (2012: 110 and 2011: 63).

On July 11, 2011 and September 5, 2011, the Group transferred its ownership of two dormant

subsidiaries, GasLog Holdings Limited and GasLog Services Limited, respectively, to Ceres Shipping
(a related company). The Group transferred all outstanding shares of each of the dormant entities to
Ceres Shipping in non-cash transactions for no consideration. Aggregate cash and net liabilities of
the two entities of $56,426 and $81,212, respectively, were transferred to Ceres Shipping in the
transactions, resulting in a gain of $24,786, which is recorded in the consolidated statement of profit
or loss.

On March 29, 2012, the Group entered into (i) an underwriting agreement with a group of

underwriters to sell 23,500,000 shares of the Group’s common shares at a public offering price of
$14.00 per share, for an aggregate public offering price of $329,000,000, (ii) subscription agreements
with certain of the Group’s directors and officers for a concurrent private placement of 261,670
shares of the Group’s common shares at the public offering price of $14.00 per share.

The Group completed its IPO and concurrent private placement on April 4, 2012, at which time
the Group issued 23,761,670 common shares. The net proceeds from the IPO and concurrent private
placement, including the underwriting discount of $18,095,000 and offering costs of $4,915,223, was
$309,653,157.

GasLog’s common shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on

March 30, 2012 under the ticker symbol “GLOG”.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Statement of compliance

The consolidated financial statements of GasLog and its subsidiaries have been prepared in

accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (the “IFRS”) as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”).

Basis of preparation and approval

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for

derivative financial instruments recorded at fair value at the end of each year. Historical cost is
generally based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for goods and services.

The principal accounting policies are set out below.

The financial statements are expressed in U.S. dollars (“USD”), which is the functional currency

of the Group’s subsidiaries.

On February 27, 2014, the financial statements were authorized on behalf of GasLog’s board of

directors for issuance and filing.

Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of GasLog and

entities controlled by the company (its subsidiaries). Control is achieved where GasLog:

• has power over the investee;

F-10

• is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and
• has the ability to use its power to affect its returns.
Income and expenses of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the

consolidated financial statements from the date control is obtained and up to the date control
ceases. Acquisitions of businesses, including entities under common control, are accounted for using
the acquisition method.

All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated in full on

consolidation.

The other investors in subsidiaries in which the Group has less than 100% interest hold a non-

controlling interest in the net assets of these subsidiaries. Non-controlling interest is stated at the
non-controlling interest’s proportion of the net assets of the subsidiaries where the Group has less
than 100% interest. Subsequent to initial recognition the carrying amount of non-controlling interest
is increased or decreased by the non-controlling interest’s share of subsequent changes in the equity
of such subsidiaries. Total comprehensive income is attributed to a non-controlling interest even if
this results in the non-controlling interest having a deficit balance.

Changes in the Group’s ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in the Group
losing control over the subsidiaries are accounted for as equity transactions. The carrying amounts of
the Group’s interests and the non-controlling interests are adjusted to reflect the changes in their
relative interests in the subsidiaries. Any difference between the amount by which the non-
controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received is
recognized directly in equity and attributed to owners of the Group.

Goodwill

Goodwill arising in a business combination is recognized as an asset at the date that control is
acquired (the acquisition date). Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration
transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree, and the fair value of the
acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of the acquisition-date
amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. If, after reassessment, the
Group’s interest in the fair value of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets exceeds the sum of the
consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the fair
value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any), the excess is
recognized immediately in profit or loss as a bargain purchase gain.

Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for impairment at least annually. For the purpose of

impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Group’s cash-generating units expected to
benefit from the synergies of the combination. Cash-generating units to which goodwill has been
allocated are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when there is an indication that the
unit may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than its carrying
amount, the impairment loss is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill
allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying
amount of each asset in the unit. An impairment loss recognized for goodwill is not reversed in a
subsequent period.

On disposal of a subsidiary, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in the determination

of the profit or loss on disposal.

Investment in associates

An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence and that is neither a

subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. Significant influence is the power to participate in the
financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those
policies.

The results, assets and liabilities of associates are included in these financial statements using

the equity method of accounting, except when the investment is classified as held for sale, in which
case it is accounted for under IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.

F-11

An impairment assessment of investments in associates is performed when there is an indication that
the asset has been impaired or the impairment losses recognized in prior years no longer exist.

When the Group’s share of losses exceeds the carrying amount of the investment, the

investment is reported at nil value and recognition of losses is discontinued except to the extent of
the Group’s commitment.

Accounting for revenues and related operating expenses

The Group’s revenues comprise revenues from time charters for the charter hire of its vessels,

management fees, project supervision income and other income earned during the period in
accordance with existing contracts.

Revenue from vessel management and vessel construction project supervision contracts is
recognized when earned and when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the
Group and such a benefit can be measured reliably.

A time charter represents a contract entered into for the use of a vessel for a specific period of

time and a specified daily charter hire rate. Time charter revenue is recognized as earned on a
straight-line basis over the term of the relevant time charter starting from the vessel’s delivery to the
charterer, except for the off-hire period, when a charter agreement exists, the vessel is made
available and services are provided to the charterer and collection of the related revenue is
reasonably assured. Unearned revenue includes revenue received prior to the balance sheet date
relating to services to be rendered after the balance sheet date. Accrued revenue represents income
recognized in advance as a result of the straight-line revenue recognition in respect of charter
agreements that provide for varying charter rates.

Time charter hires received in advance are classified as liabilities until such time as the criteria

for recognizing the revenue as earned are met (Note 13).Associated voyage expenses primarily
consist of commissions and bunkers consumed during vessels’ unemployment, which are recognized
on a pro-rata basis over the duration of the period of the time charter. All other voyage expenses
and operating costs are expensed as incurred.

Financial income and costs

Interest income is recognized on an accruals basis. Dividend income is recognized when the

right to receive payment is established.

Interest expense and other borrowing costs are recognized on an accrual basis. Interest expense
and other borrowing costs incurred during the vessel construction period, and relating directly to the
vessel, are capitalized as part of the cost of the vessel.

Foreign currencies

For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the results and financial position of
each Group entity are expressed in USD, which is the functional currency of the Group and the
presentation currency for the consolidated financial statements, because the Group’s vessels operate
in international shipping markets, in which revenues and expenses are primarily settled in USD,
vessel management and vessel construction supervision contracts are primarily settled in USD and
the Group’s most significant assets and liabilities are paid for and settled in USD.

Transactions in currencies other than the USD are recognized at the rates of exchange

prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in other currencies are retranslated into USD at the rates prevailing at that
date. All resulting exchange differences are recognized in the consolidated statement of profit or loss
in the period in which they arise.

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs, including interest expense and amortization of loan issuance costs, directly

attributable to a loan to finance a vessel under construction, representing an asset that takes a

F-12

substantial period of time to get ready for its intended use or sale, are added to the cost of the
vessel, until such time as the vessel is substantially ready for its intended use or sale.

Investment income earned on the temporary investment of specific borrowings pending

expenditure on qualifying assets is deducted from the borrowing costs eligible for capitalization. All
other borrowing costs are expensed as incurred.

Deferred financing costs for undrawn facilities

Commitment, arrangement, structuring, legal and agency fees incurred for obtaining new loans
or refinancing existing facilities are recorded as deferred loan issuance costs and classified contra to
debt while the fees incurred for the undrawn facility are classified under non-current assets in the
statement of financial position and will be classified contra to debt on the drawdown dates.

Deferred financing costs are deferred and amortized to financial costs over the term of the

relevant loan, using the effective interest method.

Vessels under construction

Newbuilding vessels are presented at cost less identified impairment losses, if any. Costs relating

to the newbuilding vessels include shipyard installment payments and other vessel costs incurred
during the construction period that are directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of the
vessels, including borrowing costs incurred during the construction period.

Upon completion of the construction, the vessels are presented on the statement of financial
position in accordance with the “Tangible fixed assets: Property, plant and equipment” policy as
described below.

Tangible fixed assets: Property, plant and equipment

Tangible fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated

impairment loss. The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price and any directly
attributable costs of bringing the asset to its working condition.

The cost of a LNG vessel is split into two components, a “vessel component” and a

“drydocking component”. Depreciation for the vessel component is calculated on a straight-line
basis, after taking into account the estimated residual values, over the estimated useful life of this
major component of the vessels. Residual value is estimated as 10% of the initial vessel cost and
represents the Group’s estimate of the current selling price assuming the vessel is already of age and
condition expected at the end of its useful life.

The LNG vessels are required to undergo a drydocking overhaul every five years to restore

their service potential and to meet their classification requirements. The drydocking component is
estimated at the time of a new vessel’s delivery from the shipyard and is measured based on the
estimated cost of the first drydocking based on the Group’s historical experience with similar types
of vessels. For subsequent drydockings actual costs are capitalized when incurred. The drydocking
component is depreciated over the period of five years until the next drydocking.

The expected useful lives of all long-lived assets are as follows:

Vessel

– LNG vessel component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 years
– Drydocking component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 years
Furniture, computer, software and other office equipment . . 3-5 years
Leasehold improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 years (or remaining term of the lease)

The useful lives of all assets and the depreciation method are reviewed annually to ensure that

the method and period of depreciation are consistent with the expected pattern of economic benefits
from items of property, plant and equipment. The residual value is also reviewed at each financial
period-end. If expectations differ from previous estimates, the changes are accounted for
prospectively in earnings in the period of the change and future periods.

F-13

Ordinary maintenance and repairs that do not extend the useful life of the asset are expensed

as incurred. Major renovation costs and modifications are capitalized and depreciated over the
estimated remaining useful life.

When assets are sold, they are derecognized and any gain or loss resulting from their disposals

is included in earnings.

Impairment of tangible fixed assets

All assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate

that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Whenever the carrying amount of an
asset exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statement
of profit or loss. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s net selling price and “value in
use”. The net selling price is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset in an arm’s length
transaction less the costs of disposal, while “value in use” is the present value of estimated future
cash flows expected to arise from the continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of
its useful life. Recoverable amounts are estimated for individual assets or, if it is not possible, for
the cash-generating unit. Each vessel is considered to be a single cash-generating unit. The net
selling price of the vessels is estimated from market-based evidence by appraisal that is normally
undertaken by professionally qualified brokers.

Provisions

Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a
result of a past event, it is probable that the Group will be required to settle the obligation, and a
reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. The amount recognized as a
provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the
end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the
obligation. Where a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present
obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows. When some or all of the
economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, a
receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and
the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.

Inventories

Inventories represent lubricants and provisions on board the vessel and in the event of vessels

unemployment the bunkers on board the vessel. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost
calculated on a first in, first out basis, and net realizable value.

Financial instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are recognized when the Group becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the instrument. All financial instruments are initially measured at fair
value. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when a Group entity becomes a party
to the contractual provisions of the instruments. Transaction costs that are directly attributable to
the acquisition or issue of financial assets and financial liabilities (other than financial assets and
financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss) are added to or deducted from the fair value
of the financial assets or financial liabilities, as appropriate, on initial recognition.

• Cash and cash equivalents
Cash represents cash on hand and deposits with banks which are repayable on demand. Cash
equivalents represent short-term, highly liquid investments which are readily convertible into
known amounts of cash with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase
that are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
• Short-term investments
Short-term investments represent short-term, highly liquid time deposits placed with financial
institutions which are readily convertible into known amount of cash with original maturities of

F-14

more than three months but less than 12 months at the time of purchase that are subject to an
insignificant risk of change in value.
• Trade receivables
Trade receivables are carried at the amount expected to be received from the third party to
settle the obligation. Bad debts are written off during the year in which they are identified. An
estimate is made for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts at year
end.
• Borrowings
Borrowings are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method. Any difference
between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the settlement of the borrowings is
recognized over the term of the borrowings.
• Derivative financial instruments
The Group enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to
interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks, including, interest rate swaps and cross currency
swaps.

Derivative financial instruments are initially recognized at fair value, and are subsequently
remeasured to their fair value at each reporting date. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in
profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging
instrument, in which event the timing of the recognition in profit or loss depends on the nature
of the hedge relationship. Derivatives are presented as assets when their valuation is favorable
to the Group and as liabilities when unfavorable to the Group.

The Group’s criteria for classifying a derivative instrument as a hedge include: (1) the hedge
transaction is expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash
flows attributable to the hedged risk; (2) the effectiveness of the hedge can be reliably
measured; (3) there is adequate documentation of the hedging relationships at the inception of
the hedge; and (4) for cash flow hedges, the forecasted transaction that is subject to the hedges
must be highly probable.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify
as cash flow hedges is recognized in other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to
the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in profit or loss. Amounts previously
recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity are reclassified to profit
or loss in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss, in the same line item as the
recognized hedged item. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Group revokes the hedging
relationship, when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or when it
no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any gain or loss accumulated in equity at that time
remains in equity and is recognized in the consolidated statement of profit or loss when the
forecast transaction occurs. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gain
or loss accumulated in equity is recognized immediately in the statement of profit or loss.

Share-based payment arrangements

Equity-settled share-based payments to employees and others providing similar services are

measured at the fair value of the equity instruments on the grant date. Details regarding the
determination of the fair value of equity-settled share-based transactions are set out in Note 18.

The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is
expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group’s estimate of equity
instruments that will eventually vest, with a corresponding increase in equity. At the end of each
reporting period, the Group revises its estimate of the number of equity instruments expected to
vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognized in the consolidated
statement of income such that the cumulative expense reflects the revised estimate, with a
corresponding adjustment to the equity-settled employee benefits reserve.

F-15

Critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The Group’s
management evaluates whether estimates should be made on an ongoing basis, utilizing historical
experience, consultation with experts and other methods the management considers reasonable in the
particular circumstances. However, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in
outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability in
the future.

Judgments: In the process of applying GasLog’s accounting policies, management has made the
following judgments, apart from those involving estimations, that had the most significant effect on
the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

Vessel construction cost capitalization: The Group recognized installments paid to the shipyard

in accordance with the contract and any directly attributable costs of bringing the vessels to their
working condition incurred during construction period as vessel costs (Note 5). Directly attributable
costs incurred during vessel construction period consisted of commissions, on-site supervision costs,
costs for sea trials, certain spare parts and equipment, lubricants and other vessel delivery expenses.
Any vendor discounts were deducted from the cost of the vessels.

The key sources of estimation uncertainty are as follows:

Vessel lives and residual value: Vessels are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The

estimates and assumptions that have the most significant effect on the vessel carrying amount relate
to the estimation of the useful life of an LNG vessel of 35 years and the residual value which is
estimated as 10% of the initial vessel cost (Note 5).

An increase in the estimated useful life of a vessel or in its residual value would have the effect
of decreasing the annual depreciation charge and an increase in the estimated useful life of a vessel
would also extend annual depreciation charge into later periods. A decrease in the useful life of a
vessel or its residual value would have the effect of increasing the annual depreciation charge and
potentially resulting in an impairment loss.

When regulations place significant limitations over the ability of a vessel to trade on a
worldwide basis, the vessel’s useful life is adjusted to end at the date such regulations become
effective. The estimated residual value of a vessel may not represent the fair market value at any
one time as in part market prices of scrap rates tend to fluctuate.

Impairment of Vessels: The Group evaluates the carrying amounts of its vessels to determine

whether there is any indication that those vessels have suffered an impairment loss. If any such
indication exists, the recoverable amount of vessels is estimated in order to determine the extent of
the impairment loss, if any.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax
discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks
specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. The
projection of cash flows related to vessels is complex and requires management to make various
estimates including future freight rates, earnings from the vessels and discount rates. All of these
items have been historically volatile. In assessing the fair value less cost to sell of the vessel, the
Group obtains vessel valuations from leading, independent and internationally recognized ship
brokers on an annual basis or when there is an indication that an asset or assets may be impaired. If
an indication of impairment is identified, the need for recognizing an impairment loss is assessed by
comparing the carrying amount of the vessels to the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the
value in use. No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.

Deferred drydocking cost: The Group recognizes drydocking costs as a separate component of

the vessel’s carrying amount and amortizes the drydocking cost on a straight-line basis over the

F-16

estimated period until the next drydocking. If the vessel is disposed of before the next drydocking,
the remaining balance of the deferred drydock is written-off and forms part of the gain or loss
recognized upon disposal of vessels in the period when contracted. The Group expects that its
vessels will be required to be drydocked in approximately 60 months after their delivery from the
shipyard, and thereafter every 30 or 60 months will be required to undergo special or intermediate
surveys and drydocked for major repairs and maintenance that cannot be performed while the
vessels are operating. The Group amortizes its estimated drydocking expenses for the first special
survey over five years, but this estimate might be revised in the future. Management estimates costs
capitalized as part of the drydocking component as costs to be incurred during the first drydocking
at the drydock yard for a special survey and parts and supplies used in making such repairs that
meet the recognition criteria, based on historical experience with similar types of vessels.

Measurement of equity-settled share-based payments expense: As described in Note 18, the
Group used an accepted valuation methodology to value the Stock Appreciation Rights granted in
2013. The inputs are based on observable market data and management’s estimates. Details of the
valuation methodology and significant assumptions used are set out in Note 18.

Impairment of goodwill: Determining whether goodwill is impaired requires an estimation of
the recoverable amount, which is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use, of the
cash-generating units to which goodwill has been allocated. The value in use calculation requires the
Group to estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the cash-generating unit and a
suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value. Details of the impairment analysis are set
out in Note 3. No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.

Fair value of derivative financial instruments: Our risk management policies permit the use of

derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk. Changes in
fair value of derivative financial instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges for
accounting purposes are recognized in earnings.

A substantial majority of the fair value of our derivative instruments and the change in fair
value of our derivative instruments from period to period result from our use of interest rate swap
agreements. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements is the estimated amount that we
would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into account current
interest rates and the current credit worthiness of both us and the swap counterparties. The
estimated amount is the present value of estimated future cash flows, being equal to the difference
between the benchmark interest rate and the fixed rate in the interest rate swap agreement,
multiplied by the notional principal amount of the interest rate swap agreement at each interest
reset date.

The fair value of our interest and currency swap agreements at the end of each period are most

significantly affected by the interest rate implied by market-observable data such as LIBOR yield
curve, and forward foreign exchange rates. While the fair value of our interest and currency swap
agreements are typically more sensitive to changes in short-term rates, significant changes in the
long-term benchmark interest and foreign exchange rates also materially impact our interest and
currency swap agreements.

The fair value of our interest and currency swap agreements are also affected by changes in our

specific credit risk included in the discount factor. Following the implementation of IFRS 13 Fair
Value Measurement in January 1, 2013, the Group adjusts its derivative liabilities fair value to
reflect its own credit risk and the counterparties’ risk. The estimate of the Group’s credit risk is
based on the credit rating of other companies in the LNG industry where publicly available, the
rating of the global transportation industry where the shipping industry is included and the feedback
that the Group receives from its lenders as part of the margin setting for the new loan agreements.
The counterparties’ credit risk is estimated either by using the credit default swap rates obtained
from public information or, if not available, by using the credit rating of the counterparties.

The LIBOR yield curve and our specific credit risk are expected to vary over the life of the
interest rate swap agreements. The larger the notional amount of the interest rate swap agreements
outstanding and the longer the remaining duration of the interest rate swap agreements, the larger
the impact of any variability in these factors will be on the fair value of our interest rate swaps. We

F-17

economically hedge the interest rate exposure on a significant amount of our long-term debt and for
long durations. As such, we have historically experienced, and we expect to continue to experience,
material variations in the period-to-period fair value of our derivative instruments.

Although we measure the fair value of our derivative instruments utilizing the inputs and

assumptions described above, if we were to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, the
amount we would pay or receive to terminate the derivative instruments may differ from our
estimate of fair value. If the estimated fair value differs from the actual termination amount, an
adjustment to the carrying amount of the applicable derivative asset or liability would be recognized
in earnings for the current period. Such adjustments could be material. See Note 21 for the effects
on the change in fair value of our derivative instruments on our consolidated statements of profit or
loss.

Adoption of new and revised IFRS

(a) Standards and interpretations adopted in the current period

The following standards and amendments relevant to the Group were effective in the current

period:

In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement which establishes a single
source of guidance for fair value measurements under IFRS standards. IFRS 13 defines fair value,
provides guidance on its determination and introduces consistent requirements for disclosures on fair
value measurements. Following the adoption of this standard, the Group adjusted its derivative
liabilities fair values to reflect its credit risk. The fair value as determined by the forecasted
expected cash flows discounted with the risk-free interest rate was further adjusted to incorporate
the Group’s own credit risk and the credit risk of the counterparties. The Group’s own credit risk is
estimated by taking into account the credit rating of other companies in the LNG Industry where
publicly available, the rating of the global transportation industry where the shipping industry is
included and the feedback that the Group received from its lenders as part of the margin setting for
the new loan agreements. For counterparties’ credit risk, either the credit default swap rates were
obtained from public information or, if not available, the credit rating of the counterparties was
used. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013. As of
December 31, 2013, due to the fact that the Group’s rating was lower than the rating of its
counterparties, the adoption of IFRS 13 has resulted in the Group’s Derivative financial instruments
liabilities being decreased by $77,112, Other comprehensive income being increased by $622,775 and
the Gain on swaps being decreased by $545,663.

In May 2011, the IASB issued standards relating to consolidated financial statements, including

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12 Disclosure of
Interests in Other Entities, and amendments to IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements, and IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. These standards and
amendments, among other things, update the definition of control under IFRS and consolidate the
disclosure requirements for interests in other entities and were effective for fiscal years beginning on
or after January 1, 2013, with retrospective application required. These standards and amendments
did not have any impact on the Group’s financial results and position.

In June 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits that change the
accounting for defined benefit plans and termination benefits. Following the adoption of these
changes, the Group recognizes changes in defined benefit obligations when they occur, thus
eliminating the “corridor approach” permitted under the previous version of IAS 19 which the
Group previously applied. The amendments require all actuarial gains and losses to be recognized
immediately through other comprehensive income. The revised standard is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The amendments of IAS 19 have been applied
retrospectively. The change in accounting policy resulted in unrecognized actuarial gains of $80,072
as of December 31, 2011 being recognized. As of December 31, 2012, the change in this accounting
policy has resulted in the Group’s reserves being increased by $31,668, Other non-current liabilities
being decreased by $61,082 and the General and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2012 being decreased by $29,414. As of December 31, 2013, the change in accounting

F-18

policy has resulted in the Group’s opening reserves being increased by $31,668, the Other non-
current liabilities being decreased by $63,861, the Retained Earnings being increased by $29,414 and
the General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 being increased by
$2,779.

In June 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, which

provides guidance on the presentation of items contained in other comprehensive income and their
classification within other comprehensive income. The amendments to IAS 1 introduce new
terminology for the statement of comprehensive income and income statement. Under the
amendments to IAS 1 that are effective for the annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2012,
the income statement was renamed as statement of profit or loss. In addition, the amendments to
IAS 1 require additional disclosures to be made in the other comprehensive income section such
that items of other comprehensive income are grouped into two categories: (a) items that will not be
reclassified subsequently to profit or loss; and (b) items that will be reclassified subsequently to
profit or loss when specific conditions are met. The presentation of items of other comprehensive
income has been modified accordingly. Other than the above mentioned presentation changes which
were applied retrospectively, the application of the amendments to IAS 1 does not result in any
impact on profit or loss, other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income.

In December 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures,

which introduces disclosure requirements about rights of offset and related arrangements for
financial instruments under an enforceable master netting agreement or similar arrangements, even if
they are not set off under IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation. The amendments of IFRS 7
that are effective for the fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2013 did not have any impact on the
Group’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2012, the IASB issued the Annual Improvements to IFRSs-2009-2011 Cycle, which
contains amendments to its standards and the related Basis for Conclusions. It includes changes to
IFRS 1 First Time Adoption of International Reporting Standards, IAS 1 Presentation of Financial
Statements, IAS 16 Property Plant and Equipment, IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation and
IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. These amendments that are effective for the fiscal year
beginning on January 1, 2013 did not have any impact on the Group’s consolidated financial
statements.

(b) Standards and amendments in issue not yet adopted

At the date of authorization of these financial statements, the following standards and

amendments relevant to the Group were in issue but not yet effective:

In October 2010, the IASB reissued IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. IFRS 9 specifies how an
entity should classify and measure financial assets and financial liabilities. The new standard requires
all financial assets to be subsequently measured at amortized cost or fair value depending on the
business model of the legal entity in relation to the management of the financial assets and the
contractual cash flows of the financial assets. The standard also requires a financial liability to be
classified as either at fair value through profit or loss or at amortized cost. The release of IFRS 9
(2013) on November 19, 2013 contained consequential amendments which removed the mandatory
effective date of IFRS 9 leaving the effective date open pending the finalization of the impairment
and classification and measurement requirement and permitted an entity to apply the requirements
on the presentation of gains and losses on financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit
or loss without applying the other requirements, meaning the portion of the change in fair value
related to changes in the entity’s own credit risk can be presented in other comprehensive income
rather than within profit or loss. In addition it introduced a new chapter to IFRS 9 on hedge
accounting, putting in place a new hedge accounting model that is designed to be more closely
aligned with how entities undertake risk management activities when hedging financial and non-
financial risk exposures. At its November 2013 meeting, the IASB tentatively decided that the
mandatory effective date will be no earlier than annual periods beginning on or after January 1,
2017, with retrospective application required. Management will evaluate the impact of this standard
on the Group’s financial statements once the mandatory effective date is set. Until such time as a

F-19

detailed review has been completed it is not practicable to provide reasonable estimate of that
effect.

In December 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation,
which clarifies some of the requirements for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities on the
statement of financial position. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2014, with retrospective application required. Management anticipates that the
implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on the financial statements as it
relates to additional disclosures.

In May 2013, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets on the impairment

of non-financial assets. This amendment removes the requirement of disclosure of the recoverable
amount of an asset or cash generating unit when there is no impairment loss and requires disclosure
of how the fair value less costs of disposal has been measured when an impairment loss has been
recognized or reversed during the period. The amended standard is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2014, with retrospective application required. Management
anticipates that the implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on the financial
statements.

In June 2013, the IASB published a limited scope amendment to IAS 39 Financial Instruments:

Recognition and Measurement and the forth coming chapter on hedge accounting in IFRS 9
Financial Instruments. This amendment provides some relief from the requirement to cease hedge
accounting when a derivative is required to be novated to a central counterparty or entity acting in
a similar capacity, under certain circumstances. The amended standard is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2014, with retrospective application required. Management
anticipates that the implementation of this standard will not have a material impact on the Group’s
financial statements.

In November 2013, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits to clarify the
requirements that relate to how contributions from employees or third parties that are linked to
service should be attributed to periods of service. In addition, it permits a practical expedient if the
amount of the contributions is independent of the number of years of service, in that contributions,
can, but are not required, to be recognized as a reduction in the service cost in the period in which
the related service is rendered. The amended standard is effective for annual periods beginning on
or after July 1, 2014. Management anticipates that this amendment will not have a material impact
on the Group’s financial statements.

In December 2013, the IASB issued the Annual Improvements to IFRSs-2010-2012 Cycle, which
includes changes to IFRS 2 Share-based Payment, IFRS 3 Business Combination, IFRS 8 Operating
Segments, IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement, IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 38
Intangible Assets and IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures. These amendments are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014. Management anticipates that these amendments will not
have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements.

In December 2013, the IASB issued the Annual Improvements to IFRSs-2011-2013 Cycle, which
includes changes to IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Standards, IFRS 3 Business
Combinations, IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and IAS 40 Investment Property. These amendments
are effective for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014. Management anticipates that
these amendments will not have any impact on the Group’s financial statements.

3. Goodwill

Goodwill resulted from the acquisition in 2005 of Ceres LNG Services Ltd., the vessel

management company, which represents a cash-generating unit. On September 30, 2011, Ceres LNG
Services Ltd. was renamed “GasLog LNG Services Ltd.” As of December 31, 2013, the Group
assessed the recoverable amount of goodwill, and concluded that goodwill associated with the
Group’s vessel management company was not impaired. The recoverable amount of the vessel
management operations is determined based on a value-in-use calculation which uses cash flow to be

F-20

generated based on financial budgets approved by management covering a four year period until
2017 and terminal multiple of 8.

Growth is based on the number of vessels expected to be under management based on the
shipbuilding contracts in place at the end of the year. Management believes that any reasonably
possible further change in the key assumptions on which recoverable amount is based would not
cause the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit to exceed its recoverable amount.

The key assumptions used in the value-in-use calculations are as follows:

(i) Average inflation of 2% per annum;

(ii) A discount rate of 8% per annum;

(iii) Annual growth rate of nil; and

(iv) 1 Euro = USD 1.38.

4. Investment in Associate

At January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Return of investment from associate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend declared. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At December 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2012

2013

6,528,087

6,856,144
— (359,973)
1,470,120
(1,640,027)

1,078,057
(750,000)

6,856,144

6,326,264

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Group’s associate, Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd.,
distributed $1,439,892 in excess of its accumulated retained earnings. The portion of such distribution
related to the Group was $359,973.

At December 31, 2012 and 2013 the Group participated in the following associate:

Name

Effective
Interest

Country of
Incorporation

Principal
activity

Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

25.00% Bermuda

Shipping LNG sector

Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. owns and operates a 145,000 cubic meter LNG vessel built in 2007.

Summarized financial information in respect of Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. is set out below.

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Group’s share of associate’s net assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

172,387,951
(144,963,373)
27,424,578
6,856,144

164,996,797
(139,691,740)
25,305,057
6,326,264

As of December 31,

2012

2013

For the year ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit for the year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend declared . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Group’s share of associate’s profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Group’s share of associate’s dividend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,586,396
5,247,878
(5,147,150)

16,721,722
4,312,229
(3,000,000)

18,618,792
5,880,482
(6,560,110)

1,311,970
1,286,787

1,078,057
750,000

1,470,120
1,640,027

F-21

5. Tangible Fixed Assets and Vessels Under Construction

The 2012 and 2013 movements in tangible fixed assets and vessels under construction are

reported in the following table:

Cost

At January 1, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transfer from vessels under construction . . . .
At December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated Depreciation
At January 1, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net book value
At December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Office
property
and other
tangible
assets

2,066,510
671,054

Total
tangible
fixed assets

458,616,071
1,042,414

Total
vessels under
construction

109,069,864
108,251,708

2,737,564
346,478

459,658,485
162,646,047
— 969,516,250

217,321,572
872,489,917
(969,516,250)

Vessels

456,549,561
371,360

456,920,921
162,299,569
969,516,250

1,588,736,740

3,084,042

1,591,820,782

120,295,239

19,008,582
12,617,272

31,625,854
28,822,093

705,460
447,626

1,153,086
499,855

60,447,947

1,652,941

19,714,042
13,064,898

32,778,940
29,321,948

62,100,888

—
—

—
—

—

425,295,067

1,584,478

426,879,545

217,321,572

At December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,528,288,793

1,431,101

1,529,719,894

120,295,239

Vessels with a carrying amount of $1,528,288,793 (2012: $425,295,067) have been pledged as

collateral under the terms of the Group’s loan agreements (Note 11).

In September 2013, GAS-fifteen Ltd. entered into a memorandum of agreement to acquire the
STX Frontier, a 2010-built 153,600 cubic meters LNG Carrier from STX Pan Ocean LNG Pte. Ltd.,
a Singapore based company. The vessel that was renamed to GasLog Chelsea was delivered on
October 4, 2013.

Vessels under construction

In May 2010, GAS-three Ltd. and GAS-four Ltd. entered into shipbuilding contracts for the

construction of two LNG carriers (155,000 cubic meters each) with Samsung Heavy Industries Co.
Ltd. (“Samsung”). The first vessel, the GasLog Shanghai, was delivered on January 28, 2013 and the
second vessel, the GasLog Santiago, was delivered on March 25, 2013.

In 2011, GAS-five Ltd., GAS-six Ltd., GAS-seven Ltd., GAS-eight Ltd., GAS-nine Ltd. and
GAS-ten Ltd. entered into shipbuilding contracts with Samsung for the construction of six LNG
Carriers (155,000 cubic meters each). The first three vessels, the GasLog Sydney, the GasLog Skagen
and the GasLog Seattle were delivered on May 30, 2013, July 25, 2013 and December 9, 2013,
respectively. The remaining three vessels are scheduled to be delivered on various dates in 2014 and
2015.

In January 2013, GAS-eleven Ltd. and GAS-twelve Ltd. entered into shipbuilding contracts with

Samsung for the construction of two LNG carriers (174,000 cubic meters each). The vessels are
expected to be delivered in the first half of 2016.

In August 2013, GAS-thirteen Ltd. and GAS-fourteen Ltd. entered into shipbuilding contracts

with Samsung for the construction of two LNG carriers (174,000 cubic meters each). The vessels are
expected to be delivered in the second half of 2016. Vessels under construction represent scheduled
advance payments to the shipyards as well as certain capitalized expenditures. As of December 31,
2013, the Group has paid to the shipyard $119,174,000 for the vessels that are under construction

F-22

and expects to pay the remaining installments as they come due upon each vessel’s keel laying,
launching and delivery (Note 19(b)).

The detail of cumulative vessels under construction costs as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 was

as follows:

At December 31,

2012

2013

Progress shipyard installment payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pre-delivery capitalized costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

210,125,000
7,196,572

119,174,000
1,121,239

217,321,572

120,295,239

The detail of cumulative pre-delivery capitalized costs as of December 31, 2012 and 2013 was as

follows:

At December 31,
2012

2013

Special bonus (Note 17). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Onsite supervision costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shipyard commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spare parts, equipment and other vessel delivery expenses. . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,800,000
3,496,981
(1,988,450)
1,888,041

—
1,168,933
(589,250)
541,556

7,196,572

1,121,239

In July 2011, GasLog’s board of directors approved the award of a special bonus of $3,800,000

in the aggregate to certain key members of management for their achievements in the successful
negotiation of commercial terms and conditions with the shipyard for the construction of two of the
Group’s newbuilding vessels. Refer to Note 17, Related Party Transactions.

6. Cash and Cash Equivalents

At December 31,

2012

2013

Current account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Time deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ship management client accounts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,014,307
93,113,328
850,680

66,867,666
28,782,037
8,148,219

110,978,315

103,797,922

Ship management client accounts represent amounts provided by the clients of GasLog LNG

Services Ltd. in order to enable the Group to cover obligations of vessels under management.

Included in $66,867,666 (current account) there is an amount of $3,089,902 kept in a retention

account as of December 31, 2013 (2012: $3,329,874) relating to the next installment and interest due
for the loan facilities of GAS-two Ltd. and GAS-three Ltd. (Note 11).

7. Trade and Other Receivables

An analysis of the trade and other receivables is as follows:

At December 31,
2012
2013

Trade receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VAT receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65,548
280,715
1,867,598
217,991

3,830,874
362,392
1,859,878
1,203,390

2,431,852

7,256,534

As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, no material receivable balances were past due or impaired,

and therefore no allowance was necessary.

F-23

8. Other non-current assets

An analysis of other non-current assets is as follows:

Accrued revenue from straight-line revenue recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash collaterals on swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Guarantee claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other guarantees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,272,519
2,356,000
359,704
82,848

2,221,172
—
155,183
281,965

4,071,071

2,658,320

At December 31,
2012
2013

9. Share Capital

GasLog’s authorized share capital consists of 500,000,000 shares with a par value $0.01 per

share.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, the issued and outstanding share capital consisted of

62,863,166 common shares, par value $0.01 per share.

10. Management of Capital

The Group’s net capital comprises of share capital, contributed surplus, accumulated

deficit/retained earnings, equity-settled employee benefits reserve and other reserves including cash
flow hedging reserve. At December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Group had equity of $603,271,391 and
$639,533,060, respectively.

The Group’s objectives when managing net capital are to provide an optimal return to
shareholders over the short to medium term whilst ensuring the protection of its assets by
minimizing risk. The Group seeks to achieve its objectives by managing its financial risks.

11. Borrowings

At December 31,

2012

2013

Amounts due within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: unamortized deferred loan issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans—current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts due after one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less: unamortized deferred loan issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loans—non-current portion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

26,482,891
(729,548)

104,751,184
(4,430,786)

25,753,343
229,176,900
(662,010)

100,320,398
1,033,487,523
(18,733,985)

228,514,890

1,014,753,538

254,268,233

1,115,073,936

Bank Loans- secured

(a) Danish Ship Finance A/S loan

In March 2008, GAS-one Ltd. entered into a bank loan facility of up to $174,033,000 with
Danish Ship Finance A/S in order to partially finance the construction of an LNG vessel. On March
9, 2012, GAS-one Ltd. entered into an amending and restating agreement with Danish Ship Finance
A/S. The amendment defines that the guarantors are GasLog and GasLog Carriers Ltd. The balance
outstanding as of December 31, 2013 was $136,152,394 (2012: $145,903,867) and is repayable in 26
consecutive quarterly installments of $2,062,913 together with a final balloon payment of $82,516,477
payable concurrently with the last installment in May 2020. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a
margin. GAS-one Ltd. is also required to maintain at all times minimum liquidity of $1,500,000 and
was in compliance.

F-24

(b) DNB Bank ASA, UBS AG, National Bank of Greece S.A., Commonwealth Bank of Australia
and Skandinaviska Ensklida Banken AB (publ) loan

On November 17, 2009, GAS-two Ltd. refinanced the then existing loan of $80,000,000 by
entering into a syndicated loan agreement of up to $147,500,000 with DnB Nor Bank ASA, National
Bank of Greece and UBS AG. The first draw-down on the new facility was $80,000,000 and was
used to repay the existing facility. The post-delivery tranche of up to $67,500,000 was drawn upon
delivery of the vessel (GasLog Singapore).

On March 14, 2012, GAS-two Ltd. entered into an amending and restating agreement with

respect to the syndicate facility with DnB Bank ASA (formerly known as DnB Nor Bank ASA),
National Bank of Greece and UBS AG. The amendment defines that the guarantors are GasLog
and GasLog Carriers Ltd.

On May 17, 2013, GAS-two Ltd. signed a loan agreement with DNB Bank ASA, acting through
its London Branch, UBS AG, National Bank of Greece S.A., Commonwealth Bank of Australia and
Skandinaviska Ensklida Banken AB (publ) for a term loan facility of up to $110,000,000 and a
revolving credit facility of up to $50,000,000 for the purpose of refinancing the facility of GAS-two
Ltd. with DnB Nor Bank ASA, National Bank of Greece and UBS AG which was due to mature in
March 2014 (“existing facility”) and for general corporate purposes. Total amount drawn under the
term loan and the revolving credit facility should not exceed 72.5% of the vessel’s value. The
revolving credit facility is available for drawing on a fully revolving basis in minimum amounts of
$5,000,000 until three months prior to the maturity date in May 2018. On May 28, 2013, GAS-two
Ltd. drew down $110,000,000 from the term loan facility and repaid the outstanding amount of the
existing facility of $101,443,442. On September 25, 2013, GAS-two Ltd. drew down $39,493,750 from
the revolving credit facility that is outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and is classified under
current liabilities. The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2013 of the term loan was
$105,000,000 and is repayable in 18 consecutive quarterly installments of $2,500,000 together with a
final balloon payment of $60,000,000 payable concurrently with the last installment in May 2018.

(c) DnB Bank ASA and Export-Import Bank of Korea

On March 14, 2012, GAS-three Ltd. and GAS-four Ltd. entered into a loan agreement of up to

$272,500,000 with DnB Bank ASA and the Export-Import Bank of Korea for the purpose of
financing two newbuilding vessels. The agreement provides for two tranches that were drawn on
January 18, 2013 and March 19, 2013 for the financing of the GasLog Shanghai and the GasLog
Santiago, respectively. The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2013 was $260,468,720. Each
tranche is repayable in 45 consecutive quarterly installments of $2,005,208 together with a final
balloon payment of $40,000,000 payable concurrently with the last installment in 2025. However, the
lenders have a put option giving them the right to request full repayment in 2018. The loan bears
interest at LIBOR plus a margin. Each of the borrowers is required to have a minimum liquidity of
$1,500,000 following the loan drawdown date and was in compliance.

(d) Credit Suisse AG

On January 18, 2012 GAS-seven Ltd. entered into a loan agreement up to $144,000,000 with

Credit Suisse AG, for the purpose of financing one of the newbuilding vessels. The agreement
provides for a single tranche that was drawn on December 4, 2013 for the financing of the GasLog
Seattle. The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2013 was $144,000,000 and is repayable in 28
consecutive quarterly installments of $2,000,000 together with a final balloon payment of $88,000,000
payable concurrently with the last installment in 2020. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a
margin.

(e) Nordea Bank Finland PLC, ABN Amro Bank N.V. and Citibank International PLC syndicated
loan

On October 3, 2011, GAS-five Ltd. and GAS-six Ltd. entered into a loan agreement of up to

$277,000,000 with Nordea Bank Finland PLC, ABN Amro Bank N.V. and Citibank International

F-25

PLC in order to partially finance the acquisition of two LNG vessels. The loan agreement provides
for two equal tranches that were drawn on May 24, 2103 and July 19, 2013 for the financing of the
GasLog Sydney and the GasLog Skagen. The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2013 was
$270,889,706. The first and the second tranches are repayable in 22 and 23 quarterly installments,
respectively together with a final balloon payment of $89,617,647 payable concurrently with the last
installments in 2019. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. Each of the borrowers is
required to have a minimum liquidity of $1,500,000 following the loan drawdown date and was in
compliance.

(f) DnB Bank ASA, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Danish Ship Finance A/S, ING Bank N.V.
and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ)–Undrawn Facility

On December 23, 2011, GAS-eight Ltd., GAS-nine Ltd. and GAS-ten Ltd. entered into a loan

agreement for a senior secured credit facility of up to $435,000,000 with DnB Bank ASA,
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Danish Ship Finance A/S, ING Bank N.V. and Skandinaviska
Enskilda Banken AB (publ) for the purpose of financing three of the newbuilding vessels. The loan
agreement provides for three tranches, to be drawn upon delivery of each newbuilding vessel. Each
tranche is repayable in 28 consecutive quarterly installments beginning three months from the
delivery date of the applicable vessel, with balloon payments equal to $87,280,000, $89,160,000 and
$89,160,000 due with the final installments. Amounts drawn will bear interest at LIBOR plus a
margin.

(g) Citibank N.A., London Branch, Citibank International Plc. and DVB America N.V.

On September 25, 2013, GAS-fifteen Ltd. signed a loan agreement with Citibank N.A., London

Branch and Citibank International Plc., for a term loan facility of $100,000,000 to partially finance
the acquisition of the GasLog Chelsea drawn on September 26, 2013. In October 2013, Citibank
International Plc., the existing lender of the GAS-fifteen Ltd. facility transferred $50,000,000 of the
outstanding facility to DVB Bank America N.V. There was no other change to the terms of the
original agreement. The balance outstanding as of December 31, 2013 was $100,000,000 and is
repayable in ten semi-annual installments of $3,335,000 together with a final balloon payment of
$66,650,000 payable concurrently with the last installment in 2018. The loan bears interest at LIBOR
plus a margin.

The carrying amount of the Group’s bank debt recognized in the consolidated financial

statements approximates its fair value.

Securities covenants and guarantees

The obligations under the aforementioned facilities are or with respect to the undrawn facility

will be secured by a first priority mortgage over the vessels, a pledge of the share capital of the
respective vessel owning companies and a first priority assignment of earnings related to the vessels,
including charter revenue, management revenue and any insurance and requisition compensation.
Obligations under the facilities are guaranteed by GasLog and GasLog Carriers Ltd. The facilities
includes customary respective covenants, and among other restrictions the facilities include a fair
market value covenant pursuant to which an event of default could occur under the facilities if the
aggregate fair market value of the collateral vessels (without taking into account any charter
arrangements) were to fall below 120% of the aggregate outstanding principal balance under the
facilities and any negative marked-to market value arising under any hedging transaction. The Group
was in compliance with the required minimum security coverage as of December 31, 2013.

Senior Unsecured Notes

On June 27, 2013, GasLog issued a senior unsecured bond of NOK 500,000,000 (or $83,206,216
based on the exchange rate on June 27, 2013) that will mature on June 27, 2018 (the “Bond”). The
Bond bears interest at NIBOR plus margin. Interest payments shall be made in arrears on a
quarterly basis. The carrying amount of the Bond, net of unamortized financing costs, as of

F-26

December 31, 2013 is $79,777,072 while its fair value is $83,072,500 based on a NOK/USD exchange
rate of 0.1645 as of December 31, 2013. GasLog may redeem the Bond in whole or in part as
follows (Call Option): (a) with settlement date at any time from June 27, 2016 to but not included
June 27, 2017 at 105.00% of par plus accrued interests on redeemed amount, (b) with settlement
date at any time from June 27, 2017 to but not including December 27, 2017 at 103.00% of par plus
accrued interests on redeemed amount, and (c) with settlement date at any time from December 27,
2017 to but not including the maturity date at 101.75% of par plus accrued interests on redeemed
amount.

Corporate guarantor financial covenants

GasLog, as corporate guarantor for all the loan facilities listed above, is subject to specified
financial covenants on a consolidated basis. GasLog Carriers Ltd. is not subject to any financial
covenants. In June and July 2013, GasLog, as corporate guarantor for all the loan facilities entered
into supplemental agreements with all the respective banks whereby the ratio of total indebtedness
divided by total capitalization was amended to a maximum percentage of 75% from 65% that was
initially agreed. A total amendment fee of $1,499,768 was paid.

The financial covenants include the following:

(i) net working capital (excluding the current portion of long-term debt) must be positive;

(ii)

total indebtedness divided by total capitalization must not exceed 75%;

(iii) beginning on December 31, 2013, the ratio of EBITDA over debt service obligations

(including interest and debt repayments) on a trailing 12 months’ basis must be no less
than 110%;

(iv) beginning on December 31, 2013, the aggregate amount of all unencumbered cash and cash
equivalents must exceed the higher of 3% of total indebtedness or $20,000,000 after the
first drawdown;

(v) GasLog is permitted to pay dividends, provided that the Group holds unencumbered cash

equal to at least 4% of its total indebtedness; and

(vi) the Group’s market value adjusted net worth must at all times exceed $350,000,000.

The credit facilities also impose certain restrictions relating to GasLog, including restrictions
that limit its ability to make any substantial change in the nature of its business or to engage in
transactions that would constitute a change of control, without repaying all of the Group’s
indebtedness in full, or to allow the Group’s controlling shareholders to reduce their shareholding in
GasLog below specified thresholds.

GasLog Ltd. as issuer of the Bond is required to comply with the financial covenants (ii), (iii),
(iv) and (vi) listed above. In addition GasLog is not permitted to (i) declare or make any dividend
payment or distribution, whether in cash or in kind, (ii) repurchase any of its shares or undertake
other similar transactions (including, but not limited to total return swaps related to shares in the
issuer), or (iii) grant any loans or make other distributions or transactions constituting a transfer of
value to its shareholders (items (i)-(iii) collectively referred to as the (“Distributions”)) that in
aggregate exceed during any calendar year 50% of the Group’s consolidated net profit after taxes
based on the audited annual accounts for the previous financial year (any un-utilized portion of the
permitted dividend pursuant to the above may not be carried forward). Notwithstanding the above,
for the years 2013 and 2014, the issuer may make Distributions up to a maximum of 60 cent per
share per annum subject to the issuer, immediately after such Distributions, maintaining consolidated
free liquidity of not less than (i) USD 20,000,000 and (ii) four per cent of total indebtedness. Any
net profit of a Group Company related to sale of assets shall in any event not form basis for any
Distributions.

Compliance with the loan financial covenants is required on a semi-annual basis while
compliance for the Bond covenants is required at all times. The Group was in compliance as of
December 31, 2013.

F-27

Loan Repayment Schedule

The maturity table below reflects the principal repayments of the loans outstanding as of
December 31, 2013 based on the repayment schedule of the respective loan facilities (as described
above):

Not later than one year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than one year and not later than three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than three year and not later than five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than five years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At December
31, 2013

104,751,184
130,514,868
514,659,405
388,313,250

1,138,238,707

The weighted average interest rate for the outstanding loan facilities as of December 31, 2013

was 3.36% (2012: 3.89%) excluding the fixed interest rate for the interest rate swaps that hedge
accounting is not applicable (Note 21).

12. Other Payables and Accruals

An analysis of other payables and accruals is as follows:

Social contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unearned revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued legal and professional fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued board of directors’ fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued employee costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued crew costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued financing cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

At December 31,

2012

2013

979,186
4,762,967
706,375
432,500
4,225,453
151,929
723,435
1,921,362
1,191,276

1,167,487
14,235,683
1,054,012
327,500
4,291,980
1,260,267
1,003,929
2,349,903
4,580,899

15,094,483

30,271,660

Unearned revenue represents charter hire received in December 2013 relating to January 2014,

for 6 vessels (2012: 2 vessels).

13. Vessel Operating and Supervision Costs

An analysis of vessel operating and supervision costs is as follows:

For the year ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

3,996,550
5,619,401
1,323,874
532,923
801,904
292,100
—
379,309

4,998,953
5,942,339
1,683,262
587,706
729,451
291,900

5,177,855
16,079,011
5,496,130
1,965,508
1,864,481
1,384,745
— 1,476,117
1,475,073

412,796

12,946,061

14,646,407

34,918,920

Employee costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Crew wages. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Technical maintenance expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provisions and stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Insurance expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brokers’ commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bunkers consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-28

14. General and Administrative Expenses

An analysis of general and administrative expenses is as follows:

For the year ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

Employee costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Board of directors’ fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expense recognized in respect of equity-settled share-
based payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rent and utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Travel and accommodation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal and professional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

8,643,153
572,500

10,995,827
865,000

13,276,175
1,266,340

3,991,673
1,180,218
269,868
1,069,093
270,090

3,167,652
1,193,638
1,320,293
2,081,900
755,780

492,822
1,167,040
1,202,224
2,928,645
1,263,678

15,996,595

20,380,090

21,596,924

15. Net Financial Income and Costs

Financial income
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Financial costs
Amortization of deferred loan issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense on loans and realized loss on cash

flow hedges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense on Bond and realized loss on CCSs . . .
Financial costs—bank commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the year ended December 31,
2013
2012

2011

41,679

41,679

1,174,361

1,174,361

410,974

410,974

708,151

725,528

3,620,237

8,772,063
—
151,048

10,780,678

20,783,517
— 3,203,758
243,888

163,356

9,631,262

11,669,562

27,851,400

16. Contingencies

Various claims, suits and complaints, including those involving government regulations, arise in

the ordinary course of the shipping business. In addition, losses may arise from disputes with
charterers, environmental claims, agents and insurers and from claims with suppliers relating to the
operations of the Group’s vessels. Currently, management is not aware of any such claims or
contingent liabilities requiring disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

17. Related Party Transactions

The Group had the following balances with related parties which have been included in the

consolidated statements of financial position:

Dividends receivable and due from related parties

At December 31,
2012
2013

Dividends receivable from associate (Note 4). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commission for newbuildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

750,000

750,000
— 1,715,313
10,809

109,121

859,121

2,476,122

Pursuant to a commission agreement with Samsung, commissions due from the shipyard in
relation to the newbuilding orders will be paid by Samsung to DryLog Investments Ltd., an affiliate
of Ceres Shipping. Upon receipt of the commissions, DryLog Investments Ltd. will forward the

F-29

payments to the vessel-owning subsidiaries, after deducting handling fees for each payment. The
outstanding receivable as of December 31, 2013 is $1,715,313 (2012: nil).

The other receivables due from related parties of $10,809 (2012: $109,121) are due from various
related entities for payments processed and paid to various vendors on their behalf by the Group, as
well as management and accounting services performed by GasLog LNG Services Ltd.

Current Liabilities

At December 31,
2012
2013

Ship management creditors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amounts due to related parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

353,695
121,663

281,692
122,786

Ship management creditors’ liability comprises cash collected from Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. to

cover the obligations of its vessel under the Group’s management.

Amounts due to related parties of $122,786 (2012: $121,663) are expenses paid by a related

party on behalf of the Group and payables to other related parties for the office lease and other
operating expenses.

The Group had the following transactions with related parties which have been included in the

consolidated statements of profit or loss for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013:

Company

Details

(a) Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. . . .
(b) Ceres Marine Partners . . . . . . .
(c) Nea Dimitra Property . . . . . . . .

Vessel management
Consultancy
Office rent and utilities

Statement of
income account

Revenues
Revenues
General and administrative

expenses

2011

2012

2013

719,500
45,000
570,283

806,340
—
652,571

713,555
—
686,823

(c) Nea Dimitra Property . . . . . . . .

Internet line

General and administrative

22,480

6,950

—

expenses

(d) Ceres Monaco S.A.M. . . . . . . . .

Office rent and utilities

General and administrative

539,300

168,912

26,984

(e) Seres S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Catering

expenses

General and administrative

expenses

135,658

137,422

150,752

(e) Seres S.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consultancy services

General and administrative

87,829

81,820

53,486

expenses

(f) C Transport Maritime S.A.M.

Claims and Insurance fee

General and administrative

28,000

56,000

86,356

(g) Ceres Shipping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Employees Incentive Scheme

expenses

General and administrative

expenses

238,000

—

—

(h) Seaflight Aviation Limited . . .

Travel expenses

General and administrative

—

29,545

35,899

expenses

(h) Chartwell Management Inc. . .

Travel expenses

General and administrative

— 665,832

133,881

expenses

(a) One of the Group’s subsidiaries, GasLog LNG Services Ltd. provides vessel management services to Egypt LNG

Shipping Ltd., the LNG vessel owning company, in which another subsidiary, GasLog Shipping Company Ltd., holds a
25% ownership interest.

(b) The Group received consulting fees from Ceres Marine Partners Ltd., a company under common control with the Group,
in respect of services provided to Ceres Marine Partners by members of GasLog’s management team. This agreement
was terminated in September 30, 2011.

(c) Through the subsidiary GasLog LNG Services Ltd., the Group leases office space in Piraeus, Greece, from an entity

controlled by Ceres Shipping, Nea Dimitra Ktimatikh Kai Emporikh S.A. The lease agreement is filed with the Greek
authorities. In addition, until March 2012, the Group reimbursed Nea Dimitra for part of the costs of the building’s
internet line. Since April 2012, the internet line has been provided by a third party.

(d) Through the subsidiary GasLog Monaco S.A.M., the Group makes payments to Ceres Monaco S.A.M., an affiliate of
Ceres Shipping, for its office space in Monaco. Ceres Monaco S.A.M. leases operating space pursuant to a service
agreement with a third-party property owner, and the Group occupies a portion of the leased space. The Group pays
Ceres Monaco S.A.M. Euro 36,850 per month for the office space (Euro 27,000 until September 30, 2011 and Euro
31,850 until December 31, 2011), which reflects a pro rata portion of the fees payable to the third-party property owner
determined based on the amount of occupied space. In connection with the office space arrangements, the subsidiary
GasLog Monaco S.A.M. has entered into a service level agreement with Ceres Monaco S.A.M. The service level
agreement was terminated in April 2012 when GasLog Monaco S.A.M. signed a rent agreement directly with the third

F-30

party property owner. The amount changed in the year ended December 31, 2013 relates to reimbursement of some
expenses paid by Ceres Monaco S.A.M. on behalf of the GasLog Monaco S.A.M.

(e) GasLog LNG Services has also entered into an agreement with Seres S.A., an entity controlled by the Livanos family,

for the latter to provide catering services to the staff based in the Piraeus office. Amounts paid pursuant to the
agreement are generally less than Euro 10 per person per day, but are slightly higher on special occasions. In addition,
GasLog LNG Services has entered into an agreement with Seres S.A. for the latter to provide human resources,
telephone and documentation services for the staff based in Piraeus. Amounts paid pursuant to the agreement are less
than Euro 100,000 per year.

(f) The Group though one of its subsidiaries, GasLog LNG Services Ltd., procured insurance for the vessels through C

Transport Maritime SAM, an affiliate of Ceres Shipping, which has a dedicated insurance function. From July 1, 2011,
this relationship is covered by a service agreement under which GasLog LNG Service Ltd. pays C Transport Maritime
SAM $10,000 per owned vessel per annum and $3,000 per managed vessel per annum.

(g) In May 2009, Ceres Shipping provided a promissory letter to GasLog LNG Services Ltd., relating to the funding of an
employee incentive program established for key employees of GasLog LNG Services Ltd. Pursuant to the promissory
letter, Ceres Shipping undertakes the responsibility to contribute to GasLog LNG Services Ltd. an amount equal to 2.8%
of all dividends declared by GasLog. These contributions from Ceres Shipping are in turn distributable to key employees
of GasLog LNG Services Ltd. through its wholly owned subsidiary, Ceres LNG Services Employee Incentive Scheme
Ltd. This promissory letter was effective until August 31, 2012. The contribution by Ceres Shipping for the year ended
December 31, 2011 was $238,000 and has been recorded as a non-cash capital contribution by owners of the Group and
a charge to General and administrative expense.

(h) Seaflight Aviation Limited and Chartwell Management Inc. are entities controlled by the Livanos family, which provide

travel services to GasLog’s directors and officers.

Pursuant to a commission agreement with Samsung, commissions due from the shipyard in
relation to the newbuilding orders will be paid by Samsung to DryLog Investments Ltd., an affiliate
of Ceres Shipping. Upon receipt of the commissions, DryLog Investments Ltd. will forward the
payments to the vessel-owning subsidiaries, after deducting handling fees for each payment. In the
aggregate, as of December 31, 2013 these handling fees amounted to $70,095 (2012: $13,175).

Compensation of key management personnel

The remuneration of directors and other members of key management was as follows:

Remuneration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term benefits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expense recognized in respect of equity-settled share

based payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the year ended December 31,
2011
2013
2012

4,129,409
203,963

4,275,814
126,931

4,978,904
117,703

3,086,737

2,262,716

349,166

7,420,109

6,665,461

5,445,773

Peter G. Livanos, served as our chief executive officer for the period January 7, 2012 until

January 8, 2013 and received a nominal salary of one euro.

In July 2011, GasLog’s board of directors approved the award of a special bonus of $3,800,000

in the aggregate to certain key members of management for their achievements in the successful
negotiation of commercial terms and conditions with the shipyard for the construction of two of the
Group’s newbuilding vessels (the GasLog Shanghai and the GasLog Santiago). The special bonus is
directly related to the services provided by these key members of management during the vessel
construction contract negotiations phase and is not related to any other services provided to the
Group by these key members of management. The special bonus therefore represents an employee
benefit directly attributable to the construction of the vessels and it is included in Vessels. A portion
of the special bonus was accelerated and paid in January 2012, in connection with the resignation of
GasLog’s former chief executive officer. A total amount of $1,672,000 was paid during the year
ended December 31, 2013 (2012: $1,843,000). As of December 31, 2013, there are no outstanding
obligations in respect of the special bonus (2012: $1,672,000).

F-31

18. Share-Based Payments

Pre IPO Incentive Plan

On January 1, 2010, GasLog granted its manager and subsidiary manager shares to its key
management personnel, including executives and senior employees (the “Beneficiaries”) of GasLog
(2,541,602 manager shares) and GasLog LNG Services Ltd. (859,894 subsidiary manager shares) in
order for the Beneficiaries to have a strong incentive to perform their responsibilities under their
respective contracts of employment. In accordance with the terms of the grant, the Beneficiaries had
full voting, participation in earnings and dividend rights, but they could not sell, assign, transfer or
otherwise dispose of in whole or in part, any of the legal title or beneficial ownership of the shares
issued to the Beneficiary or his nominee, until the completion of the IPO.

On August 25, 2011, 391,510 manager shares of GasLog were converted into common A shares

and were transferred to a third party. This transaction resulted in an accelerated vesting for these
shares. As a result of the accelerated vesting, the Group recognized $412,018 of additional
compensation in the year ended December 31, 2011. In January 2012 the former chief executive
officer of GasLog, Jeppe Jensen, resigned from his executive position and his position on the board
of directors. In connection with his resignation, GasLog entered into a separation agreement with
Mr. Jensen pursuant to which the 801,346 manager shares held by Mr. Jensen were immediately
converted to common shares and were purchased by Blenheim Holdings Ltd. Immediately prior to
the completion of the IPO on April 4, 2012, all outstanding manager shares and subsidiary manager
shares vested immediately and were converted into common shares.

Both conversions resulted in the accelerated recognition of $1,794,656 of compensation expense,

which was charged to earnings in 2012.

Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan

On May 17, 2013, GasLog granted to executives, managers and certain employees of GasLog
and GasLog LNG Services Ltd., Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) and Stock Appreciation Rights
(“SAR”) in accordance with its 2013 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The RSUs
will vest on April 29, 2016 while the SARs will vest incrementally with one-third of the SARs
vesting on each of April 29, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The compensation cost for the SARs is recognized
on an accelerated basis as though each separately vesting portion of the SARs is a separate award.
Prior to the exercise date the holders will not have any voting rights and will not be entitled to
dividends or other distributions.

The grant date was determined to be May 17, 2013, being the date the Group provided each

concerned employee with the relevant agreements, which include information about the grant date,
vesting and exercise periods, number of RSUs and SARs awarded, the exercise price in the case of
SARs, and other information and which were signed by the employee as evidence of acceptance.

In accordance with the terms of the Plan, there are only service condition requirements. The

awards will be settled in cash or in shares which is at the sole discretion of the compensation
committee of the board of directors and hence these have been treated as equity settled as the
Group has no present obligation to settle in cash. The amount to be settled for each SAR exercised
is computed in each case, as the excess, if any, of the fair market value (the closing price of shares)
on the exercise date over the exercise price of the SAR.

Awards

Number

Grant date

Expiry date

RSUs . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SARs . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,792 May 17, 2013
352,943 May 17, 2013

April 29, 2016
April 29, 2023

Exercise
price

Fair value at
grant date

n/a
13.26

11.95
2.3753

Fair value

The fair value of the SARs has been calculated based on the Modified Black-Scholes-Merton

method. Expected volatility was based on historical share price volatility for the period since the

F-32

IPO. The expected dividend is based on management’s expectations of future payments on the grant
date. The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the SARs is set out below:

Inputs into the model

Grant date share closing price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate for the period similar to the expected term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 13.26
$ 13.26

29.31%

6 years

1.08%

The fair value of the RSUs was determined by using the grant date closing price of $13.26 per
share and adjusting for the effect of the expected dividends which holders of RSUs are not entitled
using a risk-free interest rate of 0.4% for the three years until the expiry of the RSUs which
resulted in a fair value of $11.95 per RSU.

Movement in RSUs and SARs during the period

The summary of RSUs and SARs is presented below:

Number of
awards

Weighted average
exercise price

Weighted average
remaining term

Aggregate fair
value

RSUs
Granted during the period . . . . . . .

Outstanding as of December 31,
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SARs
Granted during the period . . . . . . .

Outstanding as of December 31,
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,792

64,792

325,943

325,943

—

—

13.26

13.26

—

2.33

—

2.33

774,264

774,264

774,215

774,215

The total expense recognized in respect of equity-settled employee benefits for the year ended

December 31, 2013 is $492,822 (2012: $3,167,652 and 2011: $3,991,673).

19. Commitments

(a) At December 31, 2012 and 2013 the Group had the following commitments as lessee

relating to buildings under operating leases:

At December 31,
2012
2013

Not later than one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than one year and not later than three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than three years and not later than five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total operating lease commitment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

616,171
1,043,008
29,073

644,198
476,647
—

1,688,252

1,120,845

(b) Commitments relating to the vessels under construction (Note 5) at December 31, 2012 and

2013 payable to Samsung were as follows:

At December 31,

2012

2013

Not later than one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than one year and not later than three years . . . . . . . . . . .
Total vessel construction commitment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

820,125,000
516,250,000

376,950,000
897,856,000

1,336,375,000

1,274,806,000

(c) Future gross minimum charter hire under non-cancellable time charter agreements for
vessels in operation as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013 (Note 5) are as
follows:(1)

F-33

Not later than one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than one year and not later than three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than three years and not later than five years. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Later than five years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total future gross minimum charter hire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

56,077,771
106,178,589
21,563,245

195,770,918
351,715,796
215,899,916
— 114,635,064

183,819,605

878,021,694

At December 31,

2012

2013

(1) Vessel off-hires and drydocking days that could occur but are not currently known are not taken into consideration; in
addition early delivery of the vessels by the charterers is not accounted for. For time charters that have charter hire
rates at prevailing market rates, revenue calculations include an estimate of the amount of the operating cost component.

GasLog has issued performance guarantees in favor of Samsung for the outstanding

commitments relating to the vessels under construction.

Future gross minimum lease revenues disclosed in the above table excludes the revenues of the

vessels that are under construction as of December 31, 2013 (Note 5). For these vessels, the
following charter party agreements have been signed:

• On May 11, 2011, GAS-eight Ltd. signed time charter agreement whereby the vessel will
be time chartered out for the period from their delivery for seven years, with charterer
options to extend the agreement for additional periods.

• In January 2013, GAS-eleven Ltd. and GAS-twelve Ltd. signed time charter agreements
with a subsidiary of BG Group for the employment of the vessels for ten years starting
from the date of their delivery, with charterer options to extend the agreements for
additional periods.

• In August 2013, GAS-thirteen Ltd. and GAS-fourteen Ltd. signed time charter

agreements with a subsidiary of BG Group for the employment of the vessels for seven
years starting from the date of their delivery, with charterer options to extend the
agreements for additional periods.

(d) Other Guarantees

As of December 31, 2013, GasLog LNG Services Ltd. has provided bank guarantees as follows:

• Up to $1,250,000 (2012: $1,250,000) to third parties relating to the satisfactory

performance of its ship management activities;

• $894,766 (2012: $661,382) relating to the social security fund for Greek seamen; and
• Bank guarantee of $20,000 (2012: $20,000) to the Greek Ministry of Finance relating to

the satisfactory performance of the obligations arising under Greek laws 89/1967,
378/1968 as amended by law 814/1978.

20. Financial Risk Management

The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks, including market price risk,

liquidity risk and credit risk. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the
unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group’s
financial performance. The Group makes use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate
swaps to moderate certain risk exposures.

Market risk

Interest rate risk: Interest rate risk is the risk that interest costs will fluctuate due to changes in

market interest rates. The Group’s financial income and operating cash flows fluctuate based on
changes in market interest rates as the Group has loans that bear interest at floating rates. The
Group uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate movements on bank
borrowings. At December 31, 2013, the Group has hedged 64.83% of its variable rate interest

F-34

exposure relating to its existing and undrawn loan facilities and Bond by swapping the variable rate
for a fixed rate (2012: 62.34%).

The fair value of the interest rate swaps at December 31, 2013 was estimated as a loss of
$5,725,653 (2012: $31,328,456). The effective movement in the fair value of the interest rate swaps
designated as cash flow hedging instruments (Note 21) amounting to $6,082,906 gain (2012:
$15,992,827 loss and 2011: $431,533 loss) was recognized directly in equity.

Interest rate sensitivity analysis: The interest rate swap agreements described below are subject

to market risk as they are recorded at fair value in the statement of financial position at year end.
The fair value of interest rate swap liabilities increases when interest rates decrease and decreases
when interest rates increase. At December 31, 2013, if interest rates had increased or decreased by
10 basis points with all other variables held constant, the positive/(negative) impact, respectively, on
the fair value of the interest rate and cross currency swaps would have amounted to approximately
$4,519,765 (2012: 3,806,220). This amount would have affected the other comprehensive income by
$1,525,944 (2012: $3,030,543) and the gain/(loss) on swaps by $2,993,821 (2012: 775,677). During the
year ended December 31, 2013, if interest rates had increased or decreased by 10 basis points with
all other variables held constant, the increase/(decrease), respectively, in interest expense on the un-
hedged portion of the Group’s loans would have amounted to approximately $221,198 (2012:
$119,104 and 2011: $216,280).

Other price risk: The decrease in the market value of shares of Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. in

response to unfavorable market conditions resulting in a decrease in charter rates and vessel values
could negatively impact the value of investment in associate. Therefore, management might conclude
that impairment is necessary in the future.

Currency risk: Currency risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments will fluctuate due

to changes in foreign exchange rates. Currency risk arises when future commercial transactions and
recognized assets and liabilities are denominated in a currency that is not the Group’s functional
currency. The Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures
primarily with respect to general and crew costs denominated in Euros. The Group has entered into
cross currency swaps (Note 21) to hedge its currency exposure from the Bond. In addition,
management monitors the exchange rate fluctuations on a continuous basis. As an indication of the
extent of our sensitivity to changes in exchange rate, a 10% increase in the average euro/dollar
exchange rate would have decreased our profit and cash flows during the year ended December 31,
2013 by $4,117,908, based upon our expenses during the year (2012: $2,653,310 and 2011: $2,017,298).

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that arises when the maturity of assets and liabilities does not match.

An unmatched position potentially enhances profitability, but can also increase the risk of losses.
The Group minimizes liquidity risk by maintaining sufficient cash and cash equivalents and by
having available adequate amounts of undrawn credit facilities. The Group is not significantly
exposed to liquidity risk resulting from the commitments under the vessel construction contracts as
bank facilities will be contracted to meet the obligations.

The following tables detail the Group’s expected cash flows for its non-derivative financial

liabilities. The tables have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial
liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay. The table includes
both interest and principal cash flows. Variable future interest payments were determined based on
an average LIBOR plus the margins applicable to the Group’s loans at the end of each year
presented.

F-35

Weighted-
average
effective
interest
rate

Less
than 1
month

1-3 months

3-12 months

1-5 years

5+ years

Total

December 31, 2013
Trade and other accounts

payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due to related parties . . . . . . . .
Other payables and accruals . .
Other non-current liabilities . .
Variable interest loans. . . . . . . .
Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31, 2012
Trade and other accounts

payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Due to related parties . . . . . . . .
Other payables and accruals . .
Other non-current liabilities . .
Variable interest loans. . . . . . . .

—
—
—
—

3,155,702
106,186
18,997,392
—
2.71% 2,292,234

1,763,547
16,600
8,935,082
—
59,843,497
— 1,478,067

815,424
—
2,339,186
—
66,441,667
4,516,596

—
—
—
—
646,950,072
103,223,989

—
—
—
641,317
398,980,644
—

5,734,673
122,786
30,271,660
641,317
1,174,508,114
109,218,652

24,551,514

72,036,793

74,112,873

750,174,061

399,621,961

1,320,497,202

—

—

—
—
—
—

1,359,687
121,663
7,762,261
—
2.40% 4,434,438

389,675
—
2,945,761
—
3,800,150

44,938
—
4,386,461
—
23,393,854

—
—
—
1,446,375
136,090,325

—
—
—
592,251
107,690,868

1,794,300
121,663
15,094,483
2,038,626
275,409,635

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

13,678,049

7,135,586

27,825,253

137,536,700

108,283,119

294,458,707

The amounts included above for variable interest rate instruments is subject to change if
changes in variable interest rates differ from those estimates of interest rates determined at the end
of the reporting period.

The following tables detail the Group’s expected cash flows for its derivative financial liabilities.

The table has been drawn up based on the undiscounted contractual net cash inflows and outflows
on derivative instruments that settle on a net basis. When the amount payable or receivable is not
fixed, the amount disclosed has been determined by reference to the projected interest rates as
illustrated by the yield curves existing at the end of the reporting period. The undiscounted
contractual cash flows are based on the contractual maturities of the derivatives.

December 31, 2013
Interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . .
Cross current swaps . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31, 2012
Interest rate swap. . . . . . . . . . .
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less
than 1
month

1-3 months

3-12 months

1-5 years

5+ years

Total

855,948
—

2,037,709
73,677

11,056,285
272,030

2,072,871
2,531,483

(11,473,525)

4,549,288
— 2,877,190

855,948

2,111,386

11,328,315

4,604,354

(11,473,525)

7,426,478

— 968,105

5,554,056

28,332,854

(3,105,682) 31,749,333

— 968,105

5,554,056

28,332,854

(3,105,682) 31,749,333

The Group expects to be able to meet its current obligations resulting from financing and

operating its vessels using the liquidity existing at year end and the cash generated by operating
activities. The Group expects to be able to meet its long-term obligations resulting from financing its
vessels through cash generated from operations.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will fail to discharge its obligations and cause a
financial loss. The Group is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by any of the
counterparties. To limit this risk, the Group deals exclusively with creditworthy financial institutions
and customers.

F-36

At December 31,

2012

2013

Cash. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade and other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

110,978,315
104,674,150
2,431,852

103,797,922
4,500,000
7,256,534

For the three years ended December 31, 2013, the Group’s revenue was mainly earned from
one customer and accounts receivable were not collateralized; however, management believes that
the credit risk is partially offset by the creditworthiness of the Group’s counterparty. The Group did
not experience significant credit losses on its accounts receivable portfolio during the three years
ended December 31, 2013. The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the consolidated
financial statements represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk. Management monitors
exposure to credit risk, and they believe that there is no substantial credit risk arising from the
Group’s counter parties.

The credit risk on liquid funds and derivative financial instruments is limited because the
counterparties are banks with high credit-ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies.

21. Derivative Financial Instruments

The fair value of the derivative assets is as follows:

Derivatives designated and effective as hedging instruments

carried at fair value

Interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative assets carried at fair value through profit or loss

(FVTPL)

Interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Derivative financial instruments, non–current asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The fair value of the derivative liabilities is as follows:

At December 31,

2012

2013

—

95,977

— 9,048,857

— 9,144,834

— 9,144,834

— 9,144,834

At December 31,

2012

2013

Derivatives designated and effective as hedging instruments

carried at fair value

Interest rate swaps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cross currency swaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss

26,709,404

5,526,117
— 2,282,376

(FVTPL)

Interest rate swaps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,619,052

9,344,370

31,328,456

17,152,863

Derivative financial instruments, current liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative financial instruments, non–current liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7,144,738
24,183,718

14,235,286
2,917,577

31,328,456

17,152,863

Interest rate swap agreements

The Group enters into fixed interest rate swap agreements which convert the floating interest

rate exposure into a fixed interest rate in order to hedge a portion of the Group’s exposure to
fluctuations in prevailing market interest rates. Under the interest rate swaps, the bank counterparty
effects quarterly floating-rate payments to the Group for the notional amount based on the three-

F-37

month U.S. dollar LIBOR, and the Group effects quarterly payments to the bank on the notional
amount at the respective fixed rates.

Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments

The principal terms of the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments were

as follows:

Subsidiary

Counterparty

GAS-one Ltd.(3). . . . . . . . . Danish Ship Finance
GAS-one Ltd.(3). . . . . . . . . Danish Ship Finance
GAS-one Ltd.(3). . . . . . . . . Danish Ship Finance
GAS-two Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . DNB bank ASA
GAS-two Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-two Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-three Ltd.(3) . . . . . . . DNB bank ASA
GAS-four Ltd.(3) . . . . . . . . DNB bank ASA
GAS-five Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . Nordea Bank Finland
GAS-five Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . Nordea Bank Finland
GAS-six Ltd.(3). . . . . . . . . . ABN-AMRO Bank
GAS-six Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . Nordea Bank Finland
GAS-seven Ltd.(3). . . . . . .

Credit Suisse AG

SEB(1)
CBA(2)

Trade
Date

Effective
Date

Termination
Date

Sept 2008 August 2013
Sept 2008
Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Aug 2013
June 2013
Feb 2014
Sept 2013
Feb 2014
Sept 2013
Feb 2014
Sept 2013
April 2012
Jan 2013
April 2012 Mar 2013
Nov 2011 May 2013
Nov 2011 May 2013
July 2013
May 2012
July 2013
Nov 2011
Nov 2013
Mar 2012

May 2020
May 2020
April 2018
April 2018
April 2018
Jan 2018
Mar 2018
May 2018
May 2018
July 2019
July 2018
Nov 2020

Notional Amount

Fixed
Interest
Rate

December 31,
2012

December 31,
2013

67,744,111
3.84%
78,159,756
2.10%
—
2.03%
—
1.69%
—
1.66%
—
1.69%
96,250,000
1.45%
96,250,000
1.50%
60,000,000
2.04%
75,000,000
1.96%
63,500,000
1.72%
2.04%
75,000,000
2.23% 108,000,000

—
—
—
34,166,667
34,166,667
34,166,667
—
—
58,235,293
72,794,117
—
73,897,059
—

719,903,867

307,426,470

(1) Skandinavinska Enskilda Banken AB (publ)

(2) Commonwealth Bank of Australia

(3) In 2013, hedge accounting for these interest rate swaps was discontinued because the effectiveness criteria were not met.
The cumulative loss of $11,601,190 from the period that the hedges were effective will be recycled to the profit or loss in
the same manner as the hedged item will affect profit or loss, (i.e., amortized until the maturity of the hedging
transaction). The amount that was reclassified to profit or loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 is $2,292,972.

The derivative instruments listed above qualified as cash flow hedging instruments for

accounting purposes as of December 31, 2013 with the exception of the seven agreements for which
the effectiveness criteria were not met as mentioned above.

For the swaps with Danish Ship Finance that was signed in June 2013, there was a loss
recognized at inception of $317,440 which was charged against earnings and is presented in the
consolidated statement of profit or loss under (Loss)/gain on swaps which included fees and evidence
that the respective transaction prices exceeded the valuation based on observable market data. For
the four swap agreements entered into by the Group during the year ended December 31, 2012,
there was a loss of $2,060,253 recognized on inception, charged against earnings which is included in
(Loss)/gain on swaps.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of

derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments amounting to $6,082,906 gain has been
recognized in Other comprehensive income (December 31, 2012: $15,992,827 loss). The gain of
$8,820 relating to the ineffective portion was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2013,
in the profit or loss under (Loss)/gain on swaps (December 31, 2012: $104,010 loss).

F-38

Interest rate swaps held for trading

The principal terms of the interest rate swaps held for trading were as follows:

Subsidiary

Counterparty

Trade
Date

Effective
Date

Termination
Date

SEB
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
ING Bank N.V.
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
SEB
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
ING Bank N.V.
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . DNB Bank ASA
GAS-eight Ltd. . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-one Ltd.(1)(2). . . . . . . . Danish Ship Finance
GAS-one Ltd.(1). . . . . . . . . . Danish Ship Finance
GAS-one Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . Danish Ship Finance
GAS-three Ltd.(1) . . . . . . . . DNB bank ASA
GAS-four Ltd.(1) . . . . . . . . . DNB bank ASA
GAS-six Ltd.(1). . . . . . . . . . . ABN-AMRO Bank
GAS-seven Ltd.(1). . . . . . . .

Credit Suisse AG

CBA

Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Mar 2021

Feb 2012 Mar 2014
Feb 2012 Mar 2014
May 2012 Mar 2014
May 2012 Mar 2014
May 2012 Mar 2014
May 2012 Mar 2014
Sept 2008 August 2013
Sept 2008
Oct 2011
Nov 2011
June 2013 Aug 2013
April 2012
Jan 2013
April 2012 Mar 2013
July 2013
May 2012
Nov 2013
Mar 2012

May 2020
May 2020
Jan 2018
Mar 2018
July 2019
Nov 2020

Fixed
Interest
Rate

2.26%
2.26%
2.05%
2.05%
2.05%
2.06%
3.84%
2.10%
2.03%
1.45%
1.50%
1.72%
2.23%

Notional Amount

December 31,
2012

December 31,
2013

43,500,000
43,500,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

43,500,000
43,500,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
14,000,000
—
72,935,860
63,216,356
90,234,360
90,234,360
62,566,176
108,000,000

143,000,000

630,187,112

(1) These interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting in December 2012.

(2) The swap matured in August 2013 and thus there is no notional amount as of December 31, 2013.

The derivative instruments listed above were not designated as cash flow hedging instruments.
The change in the fair value of these contracts as of December 31, 2013 amounted to a net gain of
$19,828,517 (December 31, 2012: $4,619,052 loss), which was recognized against earnings in the
period incurred and is included in (Loss)/gain on swaps.

Cross currency swap agreements (“CCS”)

In June, 2013, GasLog entered into three CCSs to exchange interest payments and principal on

maturity on the same terms as the Bond (Note 11) thereby hedging the variability of the USD
functional currency equivalent cash flows on the Bond. The CCSs qualified as cash flow hedging
instruments for accounting purposes.

The principal terms of the CCSs designated as cash flow hedging instruments were as follows:

Company

Counterparty

Trade
Date

Effective
Date

Termination
Date

GasLog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DNB bank ASA
GasLog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nordea Bank Finland

SEB

June 2013
June 2013
June 2013

June 2013
June 2013
June 2013

June 2018
June 2018
June 2018

Fixed
Interest
Rate

7.40%
7.41%
7.43%

Notional Amount

December 31,
2012

December 31,
2013

—
—
—

—

27,731,559
27,731,559
27,743,098

83,206,216

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of
CCSs amounting to $2,282,376 loss has been recognized in Other comprehensive income. The effect
in Other comprehensive income from the translation of the Bond in U.S. Dollars as of December
31, 2013 was a gain of $972,080.

F-39

An analysis of (Loss)/gain on swaps is as follows:

Inception loss for cash flow hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized (loss)/ gain on interest rate swaps held for

trading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Realized loss on interest rate swaps held for trading . . .
Net change in fair value of cash flow hedges

reclassified to profit or loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For the year ended December 31,
2011
2013
2012

(2,455,998)

(2,060,253)

(317,440)

— (4,619,052) 19,828,517
— (5,729,207)
—

—
(269,376)

— (2,292,972)
8,820

(104,010)

(2,725,374)

(6,783,315) 11,497,718

Fair value measurements

The fair value of the interest rate swaps at the end of reporting period was determined by
discounting the future cash flows using the interest rate yield curves at the end of reporting period
and the credit risk inherent in the contract. The fair value of the CCSs at the end of the reporting
period was determined by discounting the future cash flows that are estimated based on forward
exchange rates and contract forward rates, discounted at a rate that reflects the credit risk of the
counterparties. The Group uses its judgment to make assumptions that are mainly based on market
observable data for the estimation of the counterparty risk and the Group’s own risk that are
considered for the calculation of the fair value of the interest rate and cross currency swaps. The
interest rate swaps and CCSs meet Level 2 classification, according to the fair value hierarchy as
defined by IFRS 7. There were no financial instruments in Levels 1 and 3 and no transfers between
Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the periods presented. The definitions of the Levels, provided by IFRS 7 are
based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:

• Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices in active markets for

identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices

included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e., as
prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and

• Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include

inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable
inputs).

22. Taxation

Under the laws of the countries of the Group’s domestication/incorporation and/or vessels’
registration, the Group is not subject to tax on international shipping income. However, it is subject
to registration and tonnage taxes, which are included in vessel operating and supervision costs in the
consolidated statement of income.

Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the U.S.
source gross transportation income of a ship-owning or chartering corporation, such as GasLog, is
subject to a 4% U.S. Federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation
qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations
promulgated thereunder. U.S. source gross transportation income consists of 50% of the gross
shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both
begin and end, in the United States.

The Group qualified for this exemption in 2011. For 2012 and 2013 the Group did not qualify

for this exemption, however the effect on the results is insignificant.

F-40

23. Segment Reporting

The Group’s chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer who
reviews the results of the operating segments when making decisions about allocating resources and
assessing performance. The segments are: (1) vessel ownership and (2) vessel management.

As of December 31, 2013, the vessel ownership segment consisted of seven LNG carriers
operating on long-term, fixed rate time charter contracts and one LNG carrier operating on spot
market, seven newbuildings on order at Samsung Heavy Industries Shipyard and the Group’s
participation in Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. (Note 4). As of December 31, 2012, the vessel ownership
segment consisted of two LNG carriers operating on long-term, fixed rate time charter contracts,
installments paid for the vessels under construction and the Group’s participation in Egypt LNG
Shipping Ltd.

As of December 31, 2013, the vessel management segment managed a total of 20 vessels, 8 of

which were vessels owned by the Group and included in vessel ownership segment and the
remaining 12 of which were owned by external customers, one of which is a related party. During
the year ended December 31, 2013, the vessel management segment had construction supervision
projects for an average of 4.2 vessels owned by the Group. As of December 31, 2012, the vessel
management segment managed a total of 14 vessels, 2 of which were vessels owned by the Group
and included in vessel ownership segment and the remaining 12 of which were owned by external
customers, one of which is a related party. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the vessel
management segment had construction supervision projects for an average of 4.6 vessels. The
segment results are evaluated by CODM based on the operating efficiency and the profit earned by
the managed vessels.

The segment income statement comprises revenues and expenses directly attributable to each

segment. Transactions between the segments are eliminated.

The segment non-current assets consist of the non-current assets used directly for segment
operations. Current assets are allocated to segments to the extent that they are directly attributable
to segment operations, including cash balances, inventories, outstanding receivables and prepayments.

Segment liabilities comprise segment operating liabilities including trade payables, ship

management creditors, other liabilities and interest-bearing long-term debt.

Unallocated items primarily comprise assets and liabilities as well as financial income and

expenses relating to the Group’s administrative functions including compensation paid to senior
management and directors and other costs, as well as financial investment activities.

Transactions with the other segments are based on various existing service agreements and are

eliminated on consolidation. Eliminations primarily comprise of revenue earned by the vessel
management segment which are operating costs of the vessel ownership segment and of
intercompany receivables/payables between these two segments and elimination of intercompany
profit/loss capitalized as vessel costs for construction supervision services provided by the vessel
management segment.

The Group considers the global market as a whole, as the individual vessels are not limited to

specific parts of the world. Furthermore, the internal management reporting does not provide
geographical information on revenue from external customers or non-current assets. Consequently, it
is not possible to provide such information.

F-41

The following tables include revenues and results for these segments for the years presented in

these financial statements:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2013

Vessel
ownership

Vessel

management Unallocated

Eliminations

Total

Statement of profit or loss
Revenues from external

customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inter-segment revenues . . . . . . . . . .
Vessel operating and supervision
costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . .
General and administrative

expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Profit/(loss) from operations. . . . .
Financial costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on interest rate swaps . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . .
Profit/(loss) for the period . . . . . .

Statement of financial position
as of December 31, 2013

145,408,992 11,830,704
— 9,232,547

—
— (9,232,547)

— 157,239,696
—

(32,417,954) (8,390,414)
(338,083)
(28,822,093)

—
(161,772)

5,889,448

(34,918,920)
— (29,321,948)

(2,171,768) (7,730,331) (13,064,325)
(13,226,097)
4,604,423
81,997,177
(3,464,235)
(48,405)
(24,338,760)
337,094
666
73,214
—
—
11,497,718
—
—
1,470,120
(16,353,238)
4,556,684
70,699,469

1,369,500
(1,973,599)

(21,596,924)
71,401,904
— (27,851,400)
410,974
—
11,497,718
—
1,470,120
—
56,929,316
(1,973,599)

Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9,511,140
6,326,264
Investment in associate . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,746,174,569 24,082,101 152,984,096 (106,562,252) 1,816,678,514
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,175,613,909 15,031,768
89,617,246 (103,117,469) 1,177,145,454
Other information for the year
ended December 31, 2013

— 9,511,140
—
—

—
6,326,264

—
—

Expenditure on long-lived assets . 1,036,763,085

184,786

161,692

(1,973,599) 1,035,135,964

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2012

Vessel
ownership

Vessel

management Unallocated

Eliminations

Total

Statement of profit or loss
Revenues from external

customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inter-segment revenues . . . . . . . . . .
Vessel operating and supervision
costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . .
General and administrative

expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Profit/(loss) from operations

Financial costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on interest rate swaps. . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . .
Profit/(loss) for the period . . . . . .

Statement of financial position
as of December 31, 2012

Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in associate . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other information for the year
ended December 31, 2012
Expenditure on long-lived assets

56,280,836 12,261,251
— 4,832,881

—
—
— (4,832,881)

68,542,087
—

(10,778,149) (7,768,907)
(313,098)
(12,617,272)

—
(134,528)

3,900,649

(14,646,407)
— (13,064,898)

(145,602) (7,754,704) (12,479,784)
(12,614,312)

1,257,423

32,739,813

(11,592,956)
136,377
(6,783,315)
1,078,057
15,577,976

(55,150)
(18)
—
—
1,202,255

(21,456)
1,038,002
—
—
(11,597,766)

— (20,380,090)
20,450,692

(932,232)

— (11,669,562)
1,174,361
—
(6,783,315)
—
1,078,057
—
4,250,233
(932,232)

—
6,856,144

— 9,511,140
—
—
707,385,889 11,762,739 247,331,691
7,149,756
6,060,129
348,527,852

—
—
(57,712,487)
(56,241,296)

9,511,140
6,856,144
908,767,832
305,496,441

109,555,300

243,438

427,616

(932,232)

109,294,122

F-42

Statement of profit or loss
Revenues from external customers. .
Inter-segment revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vessel operating and supervision

costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation of fixed assets . . . . . . . .
General and administrative

expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Profit/(loss) from operations
Financial costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on interest rate swaps . . . . . . . . .
Share of profit of associate . . . . . . . . .
Gain on disposal of subsidiaries . . . .
Profit/(loss) for the period . . . . . . . . . .

Statement of financial position as

of December 31, 2011

Goodwill. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investment in associate . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other information for the year
ended December 31, 2011

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2011

Vessel
ownership

Vessel

management Unallocated

Eliminations

Total

55,756,426

10,714,393
— 2,577,946

—
— (2,577,946)

— 66,470,819
—

(10,099,730)
(12,612,418)

(4,692,619)
(148,721)

— 1,846,288

(12,946,061)
— (12,827,284)

(66,145)

(1,141,502)

(6,049,858)

(9,609,934)

804,699

(15,996,595)

31,902,776
(9,573,023)
33,582
(2,725,374)
1,311,970
—

2,401,141
(46,540)
8,097
—
—
—

(9,676,079)
(11,699)
—
—
—
24,786

73,041

24,700,879
— (9,631,262)
—
41,679
— (2,725,374)
1,311,970
—
24,786
—

20,949,931

2,362,698

(9,662,992)

73,041

13,722,678

—
6,528,087
580,799,328
310,582,577

— 9,511,140
—
—
24,359,209
7,361,882
5,378,561
3,796,932

—
—

9,511,140
6,528,087
(5,507,715) 607,012,704
(3,158,887) 316,599,183

Expenditure on long-lived assets. . . .

90,860,822

516,496

383,680

73,041

91,834,039

Revenues from the vessel management segment earned from external customers are broken

down as follows:

For the year ended December 31,
2012

2013

2011

Management fees and other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Project income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,312,228
402,165

10,314,756
1,946,495

9,856,800
1,973,904

10,714,393

12,261,251

11,830,704

The following table presents revenues and percentage of revenues of both the vessel ownership

and the vessel management segment for customers that accounted for more than 10% of each
segment revenues during any of the periods presented.

Customer

2011

2012

2013

Major customer . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

65,541,984

99% 66,799,034

97% 142,657,041

91%

24. Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) was calculated by dividing the net profit for the year

attributable to the owners of the common shares by the weighted average number of common shares
issued and outstanding during the year. Manager shares and subsidiary manager shares contained the
right to receive non-forfeitable dividends (whether paid or unpaid) and participated equally with
common shares in undistributed earnings and therefore were participating securities and, thus, are
included in the two-class method of computing basic earnings per share for 2012 and 2011. In 2013,
there were no participating securities as the manager shares and subsidiary manager shares were
converted to common shares prior to the completion of the IPO.

Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to the owners of the

Group by the weighted average number of all potential ordinary shares assumed to have been
converted into common shares.

F-43

The following reflects the earnings and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per

share computations:

For the year ended December 31,
2012

2011

2013

Basic earnings per share
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Group . . . . . . . .
Less: Undistributed gain allocated to manager shares

and subsidiary manager shares. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Earnings attributable to the owners of common shares

(including common A shares) used in the calculation of
basic EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic . . . . . . . . .
Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per share
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Group used in
the calculation of diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average number of shares outstanding, basic . . . . . . . . .
Dilutive potential ordinary shares. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average number of shares used in the calculation of

diluted EPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

14,039,651

4,250,233

56,929,316

1,201,919

45,110

—

12,837,732
35,837,297

4,205,123
56,093,775

56,929,316
62,863,665

0.36

0.07

0.91

14,039,651
35,837,297
3,264,199

4,250,233
56,093,775
601,744

56,929,316
62,863,665
—

39,101,496

56,695,519

62,863,665

0.36

0.07

0.91

The Group excluded the dilutive effect of 325,943 SARs and 64,792 RSUs in calculating diluted

EPS for the year ended December 31, 2013, as they were anti-dilutive.

25. Subsequent Events

In January 2014, GasLog signed an agreement with Methane Services Ltd. (“MSL”), an affiliate

of BG Group, to purchase three LNG carriers from MSL’s fleet and to charter those ships back to
MSL for six-year initial terms. MSL also has the option to extend the term of the time charters for
two of the ships for a period of either three or five years at its election. The ships to be acquired
will be nominated by MSL from an agreed group of six sister ships built at Samsung in 2006 and
2007. GasLog supervised the construction of all six ships and has provided technical management for
them since delivery. The aggregate cost to GasLog for the ships is expected to be approximately
$468 million. Each LNG carrier to be acquired is a modern, steam powered and has a cargo
capacity of 145,000 cubic meters.

In February 2014, GasLog Partners L.P. (the “MLP”), a subsidiary of the Company, made a
confidential submission to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) of a
draft registration statement on Form F-1 for an initial public offering of units in a MLP formed to
own certain of GasLog’s LNG carriers with multi-year charters. The proceeds of the offering would
principally be used to reduce indebtedness. Completion of the initial public offering is subject to
further Board authorization as well as completion of the SEC review process.

On January 22, 2014, GasLog completed a follow-on public offering of 10,925,000 common

shares, including 1,425,000 common shares issued upon the exercise in full by the underwriters of
their option to purchase additional shares. The public offering price was $15.75 per share. GasLog
also sold 2,317,460 common shares at the public offering price in a private placement to certain of
its directors and officers and one of its major shareholders. Following the aforementioned equity
raising, Mr Peter G. Livanos beneficially owns 42.3% of GasLog’s common shares.

In connection with the acquisition of the three ships from MSL, GasLog has obtained

commitments from Citibank, N.A. London Branch for a $325.5 million of debt financing with a two
year maturity and a short-term bridge loan facility for up to $100.0 million. However, as a result of
the funds raised from the equity offering noted above, the bridge loan facility was cancelled.

On February 27, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per

common share payable on March 25, 2014 to shareholders of record as of March 10, 2014.

F-44

The following companies are subsidiaries of GasLog Ltd.

SUBSIDIARIES OF GASLOG LTD.

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

Proportion of
Ownership Interest

EXHIBIT 8.1

Gaslog Investments Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Monaco S.A.M.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog LNG Services Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog LNG Employee Incentive Scheme Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Carriers Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-one Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-two Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-three Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-four Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-five Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-six Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-seven Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-eight Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-nine Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-ten Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-eleven Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-twelve Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-thirteen Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-fourteen Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-fifteen Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-sixteen Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-seventeen Ltd.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GAS-eighteen Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Shipping Company Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Shipping Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GasLog Partners LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marshall Islands
GasLog Partners GP LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marshall Islands

BVI
Monaco
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
Bermuda
BVI

100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

EXHIBIT 12.1

I, Paul Wogan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial

reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of
the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who

have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 27, 2014

By:

/s/ Paul Wogan
Name: Paul Wogan
Title: Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

EXHIBIT 12.2

I, Simon Crowe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and

presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial

reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of
the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who

have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 27, 2014

By:

/s/ Simon Crowe
Name: Simon Crowe
Title: Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a corporation organized
under the laws of Bermuda (the “Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial

condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the
report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for
any other purpose.

Date: March 27, 2014

By:

/s/ Paul Wogan
Name: Paul Wogan
Title: Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of GasLog Ltd., a corporation organized
under the laws of Bermuda (the “Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2013, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned
officer of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
the report.

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for
any other purpose.

Date: March 27, 2014

By:

/s/ Simon Crowe
Name: Simon Crowe
Title: Chief Financial Officer

LETTER FROM DELOITTE HADJIPAVLOU, SOFIANOS & CAMBANIS S.A.

EXHIBIT 16.1

March 27, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have read Item 16.F of Gaslog Ltd’s Form 20-F dated March 27, 2014, we agree with the
statements made therein.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-188817 on
Form F-3 and No. 333-187020 on Form S-8, of our report dated February 28, 2014, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of GasLog Ltd. (the “Company”), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013.

EXHIBIT 23.1

/s/ Deloitte Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.

Athens, Greece

March 26, 2014