Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Railroads / Genesee & Wyoming Inc.

Genesee & Wyoming Inc.

gwr · NYSE Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker gwr
Exchange NYSE
Sector Communication Services
Industry Railroads
Employees 5001-10,000
← All annual reports
FY2003 Annual Report · Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2003 Annual Report

Financial Highlights

(in thousands, except per share data) 

Income Statement Data

Operating revenues

Operating income

Net income

Diluted earnings per common share

Weighted average number  

Years Ended December 31

2003

2002

$244,827

$209,540

$36,305

$28,719

$1.07

$32,007

$25,607

$0.97

2003 North American Freight Mix
by revenues

of shares of common stock–diluted

26,768

26,378

Intermodal .9% 

Other 1.2% 

Auto 3.2% 

Chemicals-Plastics 6.1%  

Farm & Food 6.6%

Metals 9.4%

20.7% Coal 

Balance Sheet Data as of Period End

Total assets

Total debt

$627,173

$514,859

$158,022

$125,417

16.9% Paper 

Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

$23,994

$23,980

Stockholders’ equity

$267,086

$209,621

Lumber & Forest  9.4%

13.4% Petroleum 

12.2% Minerals/Stone

2003 Australian Freight Mix
by revenues

Alumina 8.0%

23.6% Other Ores & Minerals

Gypsum 1.4%

Hook & Pull 2.7%

Bauxite 5.5%

Other 11.8% 

17.5% Iron Ore

29.5% Grain

Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  (GWI)  is  a  leading  owner  and  operator  of  regional
freight railroads in the United States, Australia, Canada, Mexico and Bolivia.
In  addition,  we  provide  freight  car  switching  and  rail-related  services  to
industrial companies in the United States. We own or have interests in more
than 20 railroads and operate over 8,100 miles of owned and leased track
with access to more than 3,000 miles through track-access arrangements.

Australian  Railroad  Group  (ARG)  is  a  Western  Australia  based  50-percent
owned subsidiary of GWI. ARG is the second largest private rail operator in
Australia and spans the continent via the Interstate Lines. 

Net Income by Geography
2003 Net Income = $28.7 million

62.9% North America

1.0% South America

36.1% Australia

2003 Genesee & Wyoming Inc.   1

Mortimer B. Fuller III
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer

To Our Shareholders
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. (GWI) has reported record net income each year
since becoming a public company in 1996. During this time, revenues have
more than doubled and net income has tripled. Net income for 2003 was
$28.7 million, a 12.2 percent increase over $25.6 million of net income in
2002. Diluted earnings per share increased 10.3 percent to $1.07 in 2003,
also a record, with 26.8 million shares outstanding, compared to $0.97 per
share  in  2002,  with  26.4  million  shares  outstanding.  We  are  pleased  with
this  performance  in  a  year  in  which  drought  significantly  reduced  grain
revenues in Australia and the North American economy was in recovery. 

Our  accomplishments  in  2003  furthered  our  growth,  both  in  building

our existing businesses and expanding our franchise:

(cid:2) We  continued  to  manage  with  a  strong  focus  on  achieving  targeted
returns  on  capital.  In  North  America,  GWI  generated  record  free  cash
flow of $26 million for 2003, a reflection of this discipline. As a result,
we reduced debt and strengthened the acquisition capacity of our already
strong balance sheet. This focus also enabled Australian Railroad Group
(ARG),  our  50-percent-owned  subsidiary  with  Perth-based  Wesfarmers
Limited,  to  generate  $16.4  million  in  free  cash  flow,  a  noteworthy
accomplishment  given  the  drought’s  impact  on  grain.  We  are  defining
free cash flow as US GAAP Cash from Operating Activities less US GAAP
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities, excluding the cost of acquisitions.
(cid:2) On  December  31,  we  completed  the  acquisition  from  Georgia-Pacific
Corp. of three short line railroads in two locations: the Arkansas Louisiana
& Mississippi and Fordyce & Princeton railroads, which operate over 109
contiguous  route  miles  in  Arkansas  and  Louisiana,  and  the  15-mile
Chattahoochee  Industrial  Railroad  in  southwest  Georgia.  The  railroads
serve some of Georgia-Pacific’s most important manufacturing facilities,
and  we  have  entered  into  a  20-year  transportation  agreement  to  serve
these  facilities.  The  railroads  are  an  excellent  strategic  fit  with  our  Rail
Link, Inc.  Region, that has similar operations nearby and experience with
paper and forest products customers.

(cid:2) A focused business development effort resulted in ARG winning two sig-
nificant  new  contracts  in  the  fourth  quarter.  One  adds  a  new  iron-ore
customer  and  the  other  marks  the  establishment  of  ARG’s  first  opera-
tions base in New South Wales.

(cid:2) We achieved our best safety performance ever in North America and a dra-
matic reduction in personal injuries and operational incidents in Australia.
(cid:2) Based on our strong history and confidence in the future, on March 15, 
2004 we completed a three-for-two stock split payable in the form of a
50  percent  common  stock  dividend  to  shareholders  of  record  as  of
February 27, 2004.

North American Earnings Solid
North American earnings were solid in a challenging revenue and cost envi-
ronment.  North  American  revenues  were  $244.8  million,  an  increase  of
16.8  percent  from  2002.  Of  this  $35.3  million  increase  in  revenue,  $15.5
million  was  same  railroad  growth.  The  remainder  was  principally  due  to

Opposite: The outlook for Australian Railroad Group, the second largest privately owned
rail system in Australia, is strong, based on new customer contracts, a bumper grain har-
vest, and a much improved safety record that ranks near the top of Australian industry.
Recently ARG completed installation of an advanced acoustic bearing monitor system on
main routes, which will make operations even safer.

2003 Genesee & Wyoming Inc.   3

the addition of the Utah Railway, which we began operating in August 2002,
and the addition of a new contiguous rail line in Oregon in December 2002. 
Coal, paper, lumber/forest products and petroleum products were strong
for  the  year.  However,  economic  factors  caused  more  weakness  in  metals
and auto parts than expected. Coal revenue growth was driven principally
by  the  acquisition  of  the  Utah  Railway,  which  transports  coal  to  utilities
serving  southern  California.  Petroleum  products  shipments  increased
through the first three quarters of 2003 in Mexico, which accounts for most
of the petroleum the Company handles. Scheduled maintenance at a power
plant caused those shipments to slow in the fourth quarter.

When 2003 operating expenses as a percent of revenue are compared to
2002,  the  Company  managed  its  operating  expenses  effectively.  However,
overall  operating  expenses  in  North  America  increased,  driven  by  higher
costs for casualties and insurance, and higher fuel costs. The former prima-
rily reflects our first full year with higher insurance rates and deductibles.
The  latter,  fuel  costs,  remains  a  concern  in  2004.  Compliance  with  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related regulations also added expenses in 2003.

Litigation begun in 1998 by Commonwealth Edison in Illinois was set-
tled in the third quarter, resulting in a $.02 per share charge. As part of the
settlement, the Company secured a long-term commitment to provide rail
service to the Illinois Region’s largest customer.

We are optimistic about opportunities in North America in 2004. As the
year  begins,  car  loadings  have  been  strong.  The  rail  lines  acquired  from
Georgia-Pacific have good earnings potential and their integration is pro-
gressing  smoothly.  In  late  2003,  we  purchased  a  long-dormant  15-mile
line from CSX, contiguous to our NY/PA Region in western Pennsylvania,
to  secure  access  to  a  new  coal  customer.  We  will  rehabilitate  the  line  to
begin shipments of coal in the second half of 2004 to a power plant cur-
rently served by trucks.

Australia – Building for the Future
Despite the drought that decimated the 2002-03 grain harvest, earnings at
ARG were stronger than expected for 2003, primarily as a result of signifi-
cant appreciation in the Australian dollar during the year. Underlying those
results, ARG accomplished much in 2003 to lay a foundation for its future:

(cid:2) Following  the  workforce  reduction  and  relocation  of  its  headquarters
from  the  government-owned  Westrail  Center,  both  at  the  end  of  2002,
ARG accelerated the private-sector cultural changes in its organization. 
(cid:2) In  March  2003,  Mike  Mohan  joined  ARG  as  CEO.  Formerly  COO,  Presi-
dent  and  Director  of  Southern  Pacific  Transportation  Company,  Mike
has brought a wealth of railroad, operating and leadership experience
to ARG.

(cid:2) The Western Australia Rail Access Regulator provided a long-awaited rul-
ing establishing the track-access regime. This ruling provides clarity on
track  access  fees  charged  by  Westnet  Rail,  the  ARG  subsidiary  that
administers the track and right of way. 

Lumber,  paper  and  steel  are  the  major  commodities  handled  by  GWI’s  Canadian  rail-
roads.  Huron  Central  Railway (opposite)  moves  paper  and  steel  products  to  market  in
southern  Ontario,  and  a  new  60,000  square-foot  warehouse (bottom  right)  positions
Quebec Gatineau Railway to handle pulp and paper traffic from producers in the Quebec
City area.

4 Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2003 

(cid:2) ARG received a favorable tax ruling relative to the deductibility of certain
assets  acquired  under  its  long-term  lease  from  the  Western  Australian
government, and recorded a A$90 million deferred tax asset.

(cid:2) In  December,  ARG  successfully  refinanced  all  of  its  debt  with  a  new

A$530 million credit facility.

(cid:2) In late 2003 ARG secured contracts to serve two important new customers:

1. Manildra,  the  largest  flour  miller  in  Australia  and  a  producer  of
ethanol,  contracted  with  ARG  for  the  movement  of  wheat  and  sugar
from  up-country  storage  to  various  production  facilities  in  New  South
Wales. The contract establishes a presence in New South Wales, a signif-
icant rail market not previously served by ARG. 

2. Mount Gibson Mining in Western Australia adds significant new vol-
ume in export iron ore from a newly commissioned mine to the Port of
Geraldton.

(cid:2) During the course of 2003 in Western Australia, the weather shifted from
drought  to  ideal  growing  conditions  for  grain,  and  forecasts  shifted  to
project a record grain harvest. The 2002-03 harvest was 5.2 million tons.
The 2003-04 harvest in Western Australia was in excess of 14.5 million
tons. In addition, South Australia’s harvest was also strong.

In anticipation of the harvest, ARG leased an additional 81 grain wagons,
hired  50  locomotive  drivers  and  leased  vacant  property  to  the  grain  han-
dlers to store surplus grain. Train sets and crews were mobilized through-
out the grain regions. Strong grain shipments in late 2003 contributed to
ARG’s fourth quarter results.

ARG’s  outlook  for  2004  is  optimistic.  While  grain  shipments  this  year
may move erratically month to month, based on storage considerations and
availability  of  ocean  vessels,  the  harvest  is  completed,  and  ARG  is  posi-
tioned  to  transport  the  grain  when  it  moves.  In  addition,  the  demand  in
Asia  for  raw  materials  sourced  from  ARG’s  customers  has  increased  with
the expansion of the Chinese economy.

Safety Breeds Success
One of the most gratifying aspects of GWI’s performance in 2003 has been
the  significant  and  sustained  improvement  in  safety  as  reflected  in  the
reduction  of  personal-injury  rates  across  all  of  our  railroads.  The  injury
frequency  rate  (per  200,000  man-hours  worked)  for  our  North  America
operations has declined in each of the past five years, from a rate of 5.89
in 1998 to a record 1.64 in 2003. This reduction is a direct result of the
dedication of our employees, a strong safety culture, accountability and a
team approach to solving problems and addressing employee concerns. Our
safety  improvements  in  North  America  have  been  tirelessly  led  by  Jack
Stolarczyk, Vice President - Safety & Environment.

Last  year,  I  expressed  serious  concern  over  our  safety  performance  and
high incident-related costs in Australia. I also expressed confidence that ARG
could fix these problems with the same kind of focused safety program used
in North America. Beginning in late-2002, Jack Jenkins, formerly Division
Superintendent of the Southern Pacific Railroad, led a team effort manned
by  ARG  employees and North American rail safety advisors to improve the

Utah Railway (opposite) loads and transports coal to utilities serving southern California.
Rail Link, Inc., loads coal for ten mines in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin, some of which
reaches Illinois utilities over GWI’s Illinois & Midland Railroad. In 2003, three regions,
Oregon (employees pictured center), Utah and Illinois were injury free. Oregon won top
honors with the greatest number of hours worked without a single lost-time injury.

2003 Genesee & Wyoming Inc.   7

safety results  of  ARG.  The  results  in  2003  were  remarkable.  ARG  has
changed  work  practices,  established  accountability,  built  a  new  safety  cul-
ture  and  introduced  new  safety  performance  incentives.  ARG’s  Lost-Time
Injury Frequency Rate (per one million man-hours worked) declined nearly
fourfold  in  2003,  from  19.1  to  5.0,  a  level  far  lower  than  the  Australian
transport index of 17.1 and near the top of Australian industry. Notably, the
cost of casualties and insurance declined 33 percent from 2002. 

Safety is a top priority for GWI, and we are proud of these accomplish-

ments by our managers and employees around the world.

Commitment to Core Values
From its family beginnings more than a century ago, Genesee & Wyoming
has  always  been  concerned  that  its  actions  enhance  its  reputation.  The
Company’s core values include:

Integrity… to earn the respect of others.
Respect… for all people with whom we deal.
Excellence… in all we do.

All  of  us  who  work  for  the  Company  are  expected  to  conduct  ourselves
accordingly. As a public company, we continually review our corporate gov-
ernance and ethical conduct practices. Additional standards and regulations
have been set by law, and we expect to meet and exceed those standards. In
2003, GWI met all current requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and we
have undertaken a thorough review of our internal controls. 

We  have  a  highly  qualified  and  independent  Board  of  Directors.  In
2003  we  further  strengthened  the  Board  with  the  addition  of  three  new
independent  Directors:  Robert  W.  Anestis,  Chairman,  President  and  Chief
Executive Officer of Florida East Coast Industries, owner of the Florida East
Coast  Railroad;  Peter  O.  Scannell,  founder  and  Managing  Partner  of
Rockwood Holdings, which owns Sperry Rail, among other companies; and
Mark A. Scudder, President of Scudder Law Firm, which specializes in truck
transportation.  Mark  replaces  C.  Sean  Day  who  stepped  down  from  the
Board  in  2003.  We  appreciate  Sean’s  contributions  during  his  tenure  as  a
director.

James Fuller and John Randolph retired from the Board in 2003. We are
grateful  for  their  many  years  of  counsel  during  a  period  of  enormous
change from a single short line railroad to our current size, from a private
company to an NYSE-listed public company. We will miss their guidance.

Strengthening Management
In  May  2003,  Adam  B.  Frankel  joined  the  Company  as  Senior  Vice  Presi-
dent,  General  Counsel  and  Secretary.  This  position  is  new  at  GWI,  and
Adam brings a breadth of legal experience in corporate governance, acqui-
sitions  and  financing.  Adam  comes  to  GWI  from  Ford  Motor  Company,
where  he  was an  attorney  in  the  Office  of  General  Counsel,  and,  prior  to
Ford, from the law firm of Simpson Thacher and Bartlett. In addition, 2003
was the first full year for our Vice President of Tax, Rich O’Donnell, who
joined us as an international tax expert from Bausch & Lomb. 

In  Australia  in  February  2004,  the  Board  of  ARG  appointed  Murray
Vitlich as Chief Operating Officer. Murray was General Manager Operations

GWI  carries  agricultural  products  in  every  country  of  operation.  Opposite: Grain,  des-
tined principally for export markets, is a significant source of revenue for ARG. While
the 2002-03 harvest was hurt by drought, the 2003-04 harvest in Western Australia was
a record, and fourth quarter movements contributed to ARG’s 2003 earnings.  

8 Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2003 

at  ARG  and  has  consistently  demonstrated  his  capable  leadership  since
joining  ARG  at  its  inception  in  December  2000.  Prior  to  joining  ARG,
Murray headed Wesfarmers Pulpwood Operations.

I would like to acknowledge the retirement of Alan R. Harris, Senior Vice
President  and  Chief  Accounting  Officer.  Alan’s  imprint  on  Genesee  &
Wyoming is deep. When Alan joined the company in 1990, we were a private
company with $21 million in revenues. His skill and leadership have played a
critical role in guiding GWI through enormous change to where we are today.
Jim  Andres  is  joining  GWI’s  senior  management  team  as  Chief
Accounting  Officer  and  Global  Controller.  Jim  brings  extensive  U.S.  and
international accounting and control experience to GWI. He spent fourteen
years in the automotive industry with Federal-Mogul Corporation and then
with New Venture Gear, a joint-venture between DaimlerChrysler and GM.
Jim began his career with KPMG Peat Marwick.

GWI Works
In 10 years, the number of employees affiliated with GWI has increased ten-
fold.  Our  accomplishments  in  2003  reflect  the  dedicated  efforts  of  nearly
3,000  employees  at  Genesee  &  Wyoming  companies.  Our  people  are  the
strength of the Genesee & Wyoming brand. We work for independent com-
panies but from one playbook. We measure our performance against targeted
returns on capital and we are compensated accordingly; we measure safety
performance  against  increasingly  difficult  safety  goals  and  we  improve
through  common  practices  and  training;  we  measure  operating  efficiency
against  common  metrics  and  improve  efficiency  through  shared  practices
and technology; we provide a consistently high level of financial, informa-
tion systems, accounting and human resources support. 

The companies we acquire retain their entrepreneurial drive and strong
customer focus – the inherent strength of short line and regional railroads.
Yet together they are able to achieve continuously improving performance
beyond levels they could achieve on their own. They are bound by Genesee
&  Wyoming  goals,  practices  and  values,  which  we  work  hard  to  reinforce
through communication and cross-regional teams.

Our reputation and financing capacity puts us in a strong position for a
variety of opportunities. Acquisition prospects continue to be available, and
we continue to review them with GWI’s proven methods. With our careful
and disciplined approach to acquisitions and the long-term value Genesee
&  Wyoming  Inc.  brings  to  its  acquired  railroads,  we  are  confident  of  our
growth potential. 

Mortimer B. Fuller III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2004

GWI handles a variety of goods for consumers and manufacturers. Salt mined and loaded
into  trains  (opposite)  in  upstate  New  York  makes  wintertime  driving  safer  for  millions
throughout the Northeast. From chemicals, plastics, steel and other raw materials used
in  manufacturing,  to  automobiles,  tractors,  and  the  myriad  of  everyday  products  that
move in shipping containers, GWI is a valued partner in world commerce. Overleaf: Rail
Link, Inc., serves the Port of Savannah and four other U.S. ports.

2003 Genesee & Wyoming Inc.   11

UNITED  STATES  SECURITIES  AND  EXCHANGE  COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20549

FORM 10-K

¥ Annual  Report  Pursuant  to  Section 13  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange
Act  of  1934  For  the  Fiscal  Year  Ended  December 31,  2003

or
(cid:1) Transition  Report  Pursuant  to  Section 13  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934

For  the  transition  period  from

 to

Commission  File  No. 0-20847

Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
(Exact  name  of  registrant  as  specified  in  its  charter)

Delaware

(State  or  other  jurisdiction  of
incorporation  or  organization)

66  Field  Point  Road,  Greenwich,  Connecticut

(Address  of  principal  executive offices)

06-0984624

(I.R.S.  Employer
Identification  No.)

06830

(Zip  Code)

(203)  629-3722

(Telephone No.)

Securities  registered  pursuant  to  Section 12(b)  of  the  Act:

Title  of  Each  Class

Name  of  Each  Exchange
on  which  Registered

Class A  Common  Stock,  $0.01  par  value

NYSE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ¥ Yes (cid:1) No

Indicate  by  check  mark  if  disclosure  of  delinquent  filers  pursuant  to  Item  405  of  the  Regulations  S-K  is  not  contained  herein,  and  will  not  be
contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:1)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) ¥ Yes (cid:1) No

Aggregate market value of Class A Common Stock held by non-affiliates based on closing price on June 30, 2003, as reported by the New York
Stock Exchange on the last business day of Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $262,918,616. Shares of Class A Common
Stock held by each executive officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Class A Common Stock have been excluded in that such
persons may be deemed to be affiliates. The determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Shares of common stock outstanding as of the close of business on March 2, 2004:

Class

Class A  Common Stock
Class B  Common Stock

Number  of  Shares  Outstanding

20,340,165
2,707,938

Documents incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K into which they are incorporated are listed hereunder.

PART  OF  FORM  10-K

DOCUMENT  INCORPORATED  BY  REFERENCE

Part  III,  Items  10,  11,  12,  13  and 14

Portion  of  the  Registrant’s  proxy  statement  to  be  filed  in  con-
nection   with   the   Annual   Meeting   of   the   Stockholders   of   the
Registrant  to  be  held  on  May  12,  2004.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

1

Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.

FORM 10-K

For  The  Fiscal  Year  Ended  December 31,  2003

INDEX

Part I
ITEM 1.
ITEM 2.
ITEM 3.
ITEM 4.

Part II
ITEM 5.
ITEM 6.
ITEM 7.
ITEM 7A.
ITEM 8.
ITEM 9.
ITEM 9A.

Part III
ITEM 10.
ITEM 11.
ITEM 12.
ITEM 13.
ITEM 14.

Part IV
ITEM 15.

Business **************************************************************************************************
Properties *************************************************************************************************
Legal Proceedings ******************************************************************************************
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders*************************************************************

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters ******************************************
Selected Financial Data **************************************************************************************
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations *****************************
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk *******************************************************
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ******************************************************************
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ****************************
Controls and Procedures ************************************************************************************

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant ***************************************************************
Executive Compensation*************************************************************************************
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters ******************
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions *****************************************************************
Controls and Procedures ************************************************************************************

Page

3
11
13
13

14
15
16
41
43
43
43

43
44
44
44
44

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K ************************************************
Signatures *************************************************************************************************
Index to Exhibits ********************************************************************************************
Index to Financial Statements ********************************************************************************
Report of Independent Accountants ***************************************************************************
Report of Independent Public Accountants *********************************************************************
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets*******************************************
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Income *************************************
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity *************************
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows *********************************
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ******************************
Report of the Independent Auditors ***************************************************************************
Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets************************************
Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Income ******************************
Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive
Income **********************************************************************************************
Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows **************************
Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ***********************

44
46
47
51
52
53
54
55
56-57
58
59
85
86
87

88
89
90

2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

ITEM  1. Business

PART I

Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  (the  Company)  is  a  holding  company  whose  subsidiaries  and  unconsolidated  affiliates  own  and  operate
thirty-two   short   line   and   regional   freight   railroads   in   the   United   States,   Canada,   Mexico,   Australia   and   Bolivia.   The   Company,
through  its  subsidiaries,  also  provides  freight  car  switching  and  rail-related  services  to  industrial  companies  in  the  United  States.
The  Company  was  incorporated  as  a  Delaware  corporation  in  1977.

The   Company   was   founded   in   1899   as   a   14-mile   rail   line   serving   a   single   salt   mine   in   upstate   New   York.   Since   1977,   when
Mortimer  B.   Fuller,  III   purchased   a   controlling   interest   in   the   Genesee   and   Wyoming   Railroad   Company   and   became   Chief
Executive   Officer,   the   Company   has   completed   24   acquisitions   and   now   operates   over   approximately   8,100   miles   of   owned,
jointly   owned   or   leased   track   as   well   as more   than   3,000   additional   miles   under   track   access   arrangements.   Based   on   track
miles,  the  Company  believes  that:

(cid:2) it  is  the  second-largest  operator  of  regional  railroads  in  North  America;  and

(cid:2) the   Australian   Railroad   Group   (ARG),   which   is   50%   owned   by   the   Company   and   50%   owned   by   Wesfarmers   Limited

(Wesfarmers),  owns  and  operates  the  second  largest  privately  owned  rail  business  in  Australia.

Information  set  forth  in  this  Item 1  as  well  as  in  Item 2  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis
of   Financial   Conditions   and   Results   of   Operations   in   Item  7,   including   the   discussion   of Risk Factors   and Forward-Looking
Statements.

The   Company   makes   available   free   of   charge,   on   or   through   its   Internet   web   site,   its   annual   reports   on   Form  10-K,   quarterly
reports  on  Form 10-Q,  current  reports  on  Form 8-K  and  all  amendments  to  those  reports  as  soon  as  reasonably  practicable  after
those   materials   are   electronically   filed   with   or   furnished   to   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission   (SEC).   The   Company’s
Internet  address  is  https:(cid:1)(cid:1)www.gwrr.com.  The  Company’s  website  also  contains  hyperlinks  to  charters  for  each  of  the  commit-
tees  of  the  Company’s Board  of Directors,  the  Company’s  corporate  governance  guidelines  and  the  Company’s Code  of Ethics.

GROWTH  STRATEGY

The  Company  intends  to  increase  its  earnings  per  share  and  return  on  invested  capital  by:

(cid:2) acquiring  rail  lines  that  are  close  to  or  contiguous  with  its  existing  regional  rail  systems  in  order  to  improve  asset  utilization

and  reduce  operating  costs;

(cid:2) broadening  its  geographic  presence  by  acquiring  significant  rail  lines  in  new  regions  where  the  Company  believes  there  are

additional  business  development  and  acquisition  opportunities;

(cid:2) expanding  its  revenue  base  within  each  region  it  serves  through  focused  marketing  efforts  and  a  high  level  of  customer

service;  and

(cid:2) improving  its  operating  performance  through  the  reduction  of  operating  expense  and  the  more  efficient  use  of  equipment

and  facilities.

The   Company   has   a   disciplined   acquisition   and   investment-driven   strategy   that   focuses   on   both   domestic   and   international
opportunities.   From   1977   to   1997,   the   Company   acquired   and   integrated   ten   acquisitions   in   the   United   States.   From   1997   to
2000,  the  Company  acquired  or  made  investments  in  seven  railroads  internationally,  including  in  South  Australia  (1997),  Canada
(1997),  Mexico  (1999),  Western  Australia  (2000) and  Bolivia  (2000).  Since  2001,  the  Company  has  made  seven  acquisitions  in  the
U.S.  and  Canada,  including  South  Buffalo  Railway  Company  (October 2001),  Emons  Transportation  Group  (February  2002),  Utah
Railway  Company  (August 2002),  a  rail  line  leased  from  Burlington  Northern  Santa  Fe (BNSF)
in  Oregon  (December 2002),  and
most   recently,   Arkansas   Louisiana   &   Mississippi   Railroad   Company,   Chattahoochee   Industrial   Railroad   and   Fordyce   and
Princeton  R.R.  Co.,  all  acquired  from  Georgia-Pacific  Corporation (GP) (December 2003).

The  Company’s  recent  acquisitions  and  investments  include:

(cid:2) rail  lines  owned  by  industrial  companies,  such  as  Bethlehem  Steel,  Mueller  Industries  and GP;

(cid:2) branch  lines  of  Class I  railroads;

(cid:2) other  regional  railroads  or  short  line  railroads;  and

(cid:2) foreign  government-owned  railroads  that  have  been  privatized.

The  Company  believes  that  the  market  for  acquisitions  in  the  United  States  includes  over  500  short  line  and  regional  railroads
operating   over   approximately   50,000   miles   of   track,   as   well   as   additional   lines   expected   to   be   sold   by   Class  I   railroads.
Internationally,   the   Company   believes   there   are   additional   acquisition   or   privatization   candidates   in   Australia,   Canada,   South
America   and   other   markets.   Furthermore,   the   Company   believes   that   there   are   a   relatively   small   number   of   well   capitalized
operators  currently  bidding  for  properties  in  the  international  and  U.S.  rail  markets.  As  a  result,  the  Company  believes  that  i t  is
well  positioned  to  capitalize  on  additional  acquisition  opportunities.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

3

In  evaluating  potential  acquisitions  and  investments,  the  criteria  the  Company  considers,  among  others,  include:

(cid:2) projected  risk  adjusted  return  on  investment;

(cid:2) potential  for  additional  revenue  and  service  improvements;

(cid:2) identifiable  cost  savings  and  synergies,  such  as  asset  utilization  improvements,  consolidation  of  administrative  functions,

and  operational  improvements;  and

(cid:2) diversification  of  overall  commodity  and  geographic  mix.

In   new   regions,   the   Company   targets   rail   properties   that   have   adequate   size   to   establish   a   presence   in   the   region,   provide   a
platform   for   growth   in   the   region,   and   attract   qualified   management.   When   acquiring   rail   properties   in   its   existing   regions,   the
Company  targets  contiguous  rail  properties  where  it  believes  there  are  significant  opportunities  to  realize  operating  efficiencies.
The   Company’s   strategy   of   building   regional   rail   systems   is   illustrated   by   its   original   U.S.   region,   the   New   York-Pennsylvania
Region,  and  ARG,  its  50%-owned  Australian  operation.

(cid:2) New  York-Pennsylvania  Region.  Starting  with  its  original  rail  line,  the  Genesee  and  Wyoming,  the  Company  has  completed
seven   contiguous   acquisitions   since   1985,   creating   a   regional   railroad   linking   Western   New   York   with   Western   Penn-
sylvania.  This  region  now  has  approximately  $47.0 million  in  annual  revenue  and  a  diverse  commodity  base  including  coal,
petroleum,  auto  parts,  chemicals,  pulp  and  paper,  minerals  and  stone,  and  steel.

(cid:2) Australian  Railroad  Group.  Over  the  past  six  years,  the  Company  has  been  sequentially  building  a  regional  rail  business
that   operates   over   most   of   the   Australian   continent.   In   Australia,   the   Company   (1)  entered   the   market   through   the
acquisition   of   the government-owned   rail   system   of   South   Australia   in   1997;   (2)   secured   a   contract   to   operate   iron   ore
supply   rail-lines   and   in-plant   rail   operations   for   a   steel   mill   in   Whyalla,   South   Australia   in   1999;   (3)  combined   its   South
Australian  railroad  business  with  previously  government-owned  rail  assets  of  Western  Australia,  which  were  acquired  by
ARG  with  Wesfarmers  in  December 2000;  (4) acquired  an  equity  interest  (2.14%  at  December 31,  2003)  in  a  consortium  to
build,  own  and  operate  an  885-mile  rail  line  from  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  in  the  Northern  Territory  of  Australia  in  April 2001;
and  (5) added  a  new  contract  in  New  South  Wales  on  the  east  coast  of  Australia  in  November  2003.

MARKETING

The   Company   builds   each   regional   railroad   business   on   a   base   of   large   industrial   customers,   grows   that   business   through
marketing  efforts,  and  creates  additional  revenues  by  attracting  new  customers  and  providing  ancillary  rail  services.  By  providing
improved  service  to  shippers,  the  Company  is  often  able  to  provide  increased  revenue  to  the  Class I  carriers  that  connect  with  its
North  American  lines.  The  Company’s  marketing  efforts  are  often  aimed  at  enhancing  its  railroads’  relationships  with  both  Class I
carriers  and  shippers.  Thus  the  Company  provides ancillary  rail  services,  such  as  railcar  repair,  switching,  storage,  weighing  and
blocking  and  bulk  transfer,  which  enable  Class I  carriers  and  customers  to  move  freight  more  easily  and  cost-effectively.

OPERATIONS

The  Company  focuses  on  lowering  operating  costs  and  improving  asset  efficiency  to  maximize  its  return  on  invested  capital,  and
has  historically  been  able  to  operate  acquired  rail  lines  more  efficiently  than  the  Class I  railroads  and  governments  from  whom  it
acquired  these  properties.  The  Company  typically  achieves  efficiencies  through  lowering  administrative  overhead,  consolidating
equipment  and  track  maintenance  contracts,  reducing  transportation  costs,  and  selling  certain  assets.

The   Company   also improves   the   operating   efficiency   of   its   railroads   by   track   rehabilitation.   Under   certain   circumstances,   the
Company  is  able  to  obtain  state  and  federal  funding  to  rehabilitate  track  because  of  the  importance  of  certain  of  the  Company’s
shippers  and  railroads  to  the  economic  stability  and/or  development  of  the  regions  where  they  are  located.  For  a  discussion  of
government  grants,  see  Note  15  to  the  Company’s  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  set  forth  in  Part  IV,  Item 15  of  this  Annual
Report.

INDUSTRY  OVERVIEW

According  to  the  Association  of  American  Railroads  (AAR),  there  are  552  railroads  in  the  United  States  operating  over  141,391
miles  of  track.  The  AAR  segments  U.S.  railroads  into  one  of  three  categories  based  on  the  amount  of  their  revenues  and  track
miles.  Class I  railroads,  those  with  over  $272.0  million  in  revenues,  represent  over  90%  of  total  rail  revenues.  Regional  and  local
railroads  operate  approximately  41,000  miles  of  track  in  the  United  States.  The  primary  function  of  these  smaller  railroads  is  to
provide  feeder  traffic  to  the  Class I  carriers.  In  terms  of  revenue,  regional  and  local  railroads  combined  account  for  approximately
8%  of  total  rail  revenues.

4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

The  following  table  shows  the  breakdown  of U.S. railroads  by  classification.

Classification of Railroads

Number

Class I

Regional

Local

Total

7

31

514

552

Aggregate
Miles
Operated

99,943

15,048

26,400

141,391

Revenues and Miles
Operated

over $272.0 million

$40.0 to $271.9 million and/or
350 or more miles operated

less than $40.0 million and less
than 350 miles operated

Source:  Association  of  American  Railroads, Railroad  Facts,  2003  Edition.

The  railroad  industry  in  the  United  States  has  undergone  significant  change  since  the  passage  of  the  Staggers  Rail  Act  of  1980,
which  deregulated  the  pricing  and  types  of  services  provided  by  railroads.  Following  the  passage  of  the  Staggers  Act,  Class I
railroads  in  the  United  States  took  steps  to  improve  profitability  and  recapture  market  share.  In  furtherance  of  that  goal,  Class I
railroads  focused  their  management  and  capital  resources  on  their  long-haul  core  systems,  and  some  of  them  sold  branch  lines
to   smaller   and   more   cost-efficient   rail   operators   willing   to   commit   the   resources   necessary   to   meet   the   needs   of   the   shippers
located  on  these  lines.  Divestiture  of  branch  lines  enabled  Class I  carriers  to  minimize  incremental  capital  expenditures,  concen-
trate  traffic  density,  improve  operating  efficiency,  and  avoid  traffic  losses  associated  with  rail  line  abandonment.

Although   the   acquisition   market   is   competitive,   the   Company   believes   that   it   will   continue   to   find   opportunities   to   acquire   rail
properties   in   the   United   States   and   Canada   from   Class  I   railroads,   industrial   companies,   and   independent   local   and   regional
railroads.  The  Company  also  believes  that  it  will  continue  to  find  additional  acquisition  opportunities  in  Australia,  Canada,  South
America  and  other  markets.

The  Company’s  Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief  Operating  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  have  responsibility  for  overall  strategic
and   financial   planning   including   acquisitions.   The   Chief   Executive   Officer   is   responsible   for   the   Company’s   global   operations
including  its  equity  investments  in  Australia  and  South  America,  while  the  Chief  Operating  Officer  manages  operations  in  North
America.  The  Company  believes  that  through  its  decentralized  management  structure  it  has  developed  a  culture  that  encourages
employees  to  take  initiative  and  responsibility  which  is  rewarded  through  performance-based  bonus  programs.

MANAGEMENT

North  American  Customers

NORTH  AMERICAN  OPERATIONS

The  Company’s  North  American operations  served  over  850  customers  in  2003  compared  with  approximately  800  customers  in
2002.   The   largest   ten   North   American   customers   accounted   for   approximately   27%,   29%   and   30%   of   the   Company’s   North
American   revenues   in   2003,   2002   and   2001,   respectively.   In   2003,   2002   and   2001,   the   Company’s   largest   North   American
customer  was  a  coal-fired  electricity  generating  plant  which  accounted  for  approximately  5%,  5%  and  7%,  respectively,  of  the
Company’s   North   American   revenues.   The   Company   typically   handles   freight   pursuant   to   transportation   contracts   among   the
Company,  its  connecting  carriers  and  the  shipper.  These  contracts  are  in  accordance  with  industry  norms  and  vary  in  duration
with  a  term  of  up  to  20 years.  These  contracts  establish  price  but  do  not  typically  obligate  the  shipper  to  move  any  particular
volume.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

5

North  American  Commodities

The   Company’s   North   American   railroads   transport   a   wide   variety   of   commodities.   Some   of   the   Company’s   railroads   have   a
diversified   commodity   mix   while   others   transport   one   or   two   principal   commodities.   In   2003,   coal,   coke   and   ores,   and   paper
products  were  the  two  largest  commodity  groups  transported  by  the  Company’s  North  American  railroads,  constituting  20.7%
and  16.9%,  respectively,  of  total  North  American  freight  revenues,  and  31.5%  and  14.1%,  respectively,  of  total  North  American
carloads.  The  following  table  compares  North  American  freight  revenues,  carloads  and  average  freight  revenues  per  carload  for
the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

North  American  Freight  Revenues  and  Carloads  Comparison  by  Commodity  Group
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(dollars  in  thousands,  except  average  per  carload)

Commodity Group

2003

Freight Revenues

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

Carloads

Average
Freight
Revenue
Per Carload
2002
2003

Coal, Coke & Ores

$ 37,881

20.7% $ 28,685

18.2% 167,363

31.2% 136,044

29.6% $226

$211

Pulp & Paper

Petroleum Products

Minerals & Stone

Lumber & Forest Products

Metals

Farm & Food Products

Chemicals-Plastics

Autos & Auto Parts

Intermodal

Other

Totals

30,939

24,455

22,350

17,093

17,078

12,133

11,067

5,775

1,574

2,222

16.9%

13.4%

12.2%

9.4%

9.4%

6.6%

6.1%

3.2%

0.9%

1.2%

25,711

20,655

21,236

12,828

15,993

10,158

9,523

6,996

1,302

4,202

16.3%

13.1%

13.5%

8.2%

10.2%

6.5%

6.1%

4.4%

0.8%

2.7%

74,662

31,798

57,841

53,793

58,145

32,589

23,517

14,235

5,518

10,292

14.1% 64,494

14.0% 414

6.0% 29,479

6.4% 769

10.9% 50,844

11.0% 286

10.2% 36,265

7.9% 318

11.0% 57,846

12.6% 294

6.2% 27,378

5.9% 372

4.5% 19,949

4.3% 471

2.8% 17,130

3.7% 406

1.1%

5,387

1.2% 285

2.0% 15,527

3.4% 216

$182,567

100.0% $157,289

100.0% 529,753

100.0% 460,343

100.0% 345

399

701

418

354

276

371

477

408

242

271

342

Coal,  coke  and  ores  consist  primarily  of  shipments  of  coal  to  power  plants  and  industrial  customers.

Pulp  and  paper  consists  primarily  of  inbound  shipments  of  pulp  and  outbound  shipments  of  kraft  and  finished  papers.

Petroleum  products  consist  primarily  of  fuel  oil  and  crude  oil.

Minerals  and  stone  consists  primarily  of  cement,  gravel  and  stone  used  in  construction,  and  salt  used  in  highway  ice  control.

Lumber  and  forest  products  consists  primarily  of  finished  lumber  used  in  construction,  particleboard  used  in  furniture  manufac-
turing,  and  wood  chips  and  pulpwood  used  in  paper  manufacturing.

Metals  consist  primarily  of  scrap  metal,  finished  steel  products  and  coated  pipe.

Farm  and  food  products  consist  primarily  of  sugar,  molasses,  rice  and  other  grains  and  fertilizer.

Chemicals  consist  primarily  of  various  chemicals  used  in  manufacturing.

Autos  and  auto  parts  consist  primarily  of  finished  automobiles  and  stamped  auto  parts.

Intermodal  consists  primarily  of  various  commodities  shipped  in  trailers  or  containers  on  flat  cars.

North  American  Non-Freight  Revenues

North   American   non-freight   revenues   consist   of ancillary rail   services   such   as   railcar   switching,   car   hire   and   rental,   repair,
storage,  weighing,  blocking  and  bulk  transfer,  which  enable  Class I  carriers  and  customers  to  move  freight  more  easily  and  cost-
effectively.  The  Company’s  primary components  of  non-freight  revenues  are  railcar  switching  revenues,  other  operating  income
and  car  hire  and  rental  revenues.  Railcar  switching  revenues  primarily  consist  of  intra-plant  switching,  which  is  revenue  earned  by
providing  services  dedicated  to  the  movement  of  railcars  within  industrial  plants,  and  intra-terminal  switching,  which  is  revenue
earned   for   the   movement   of   customer   railcars   from   one   track   to   another   track   on   the   same   railroad.   Other   operating   income
primarily   consists   of   trackage   rights   fees,   which   are   charges   to   other   railroads   for   running   over   the   Company’s   railroads,
demurrage  and  storage,  which  are  charges  to  customers  for  holding  or  storing  railcars,  and  management  fees,  which  are  charges
for  managing  rail-related  facilities. Car  hire  and  rental  revenues  primarily  include  charges  paid  by  other  railroads  for  use  of  the
Company’s  railcars  for  moving  freight. In  2003  and  2002,  non-freight  revenues  constituted  25.4%  and  24.9%,  respectively,  of  the
Company’s  total  North  American  operating  revenues  with  railroad  switching  representing  35.8%  and  54.4%,  respectively,  of  total

6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

North   American   non-freight   revenues.   The   following   table   compares   North   American   non-freight   revenues   for   the   years   ended
December 31,  2003  and  2002:

North  American  Non-Freight  Revenues  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(dollars  in  thousands)

Railcar switching

Car hire and rental

Car repair services

Other operating income

Total non-freight revenues

% of
Non-freight
Total

35.8%

20.2%

9.6%

34.4%

2003

$33,371

7,054

4,447

17,388

% of
Non-freight
Total

54.4%

14.4%

6.8%

24.4%

2002

$28,426

7,503

3,563

12,759

$62,260

100.0%

$52,251

100.0%

The  following  table  compares  total  North  American  revenues  by  geographic  area  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and
2002:

Revenues:

United States

Canada

Mexico

Total operating revenues

Geographic Area Data
For the years ended

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

$175,650

37,538

31,639

71.8%

15.3%

12.9%

148,570

32,150

28,820

70.9%

15.3%

13.8%

$244,827

100.0% $209,540

100.0%

For   additional   financial   information   with   respect   to   each   of   the   Company’s   geographic   areas,   see   Note   18   to   the   Company’s
Consolidated   Financial   Statements   set   forth   in   Part   IV,   Item  15   of   this   Annual   Report   on   Form  10-K.   Typically,   the   Company
experiences  relatively  lower  revenues  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters  of  each  year  as  the  holiday  season  and  colder  weather  tend
to  reduce  shipments  of  certain  products  such  as  construction  materials.  In  addition,  due  to  adverse  winter  weather  conditions,
the  Company  also  tends  to  incur  higher  operating  costs  during  the  first  and  fourth  quarters.  As  a  result,  the  Company  typically
initiates  capital  projects  in  the  second  and  third  quarters  when  weather  conditions  are  more  favorable. However,  certain  of  the
Company’s  traffic,  such  as  coal  for  electricity  generating  facilities  and  salt  for  road  de-icing,  may  benefit  from  particularly  cold
weather.

North  American  Employees

As   of   December  31,   2003,   the   Company’s   North   American   railroads   and   industrial   switching   locations   had   1,838   full-time
employees.   Of   this   total,   831   are   members   of   national   labor   organizations.   The   Company’s   North   American   railroads   have   29
contracts  with  these  national  labor  organizations  which  have  expiration  dates  ranging  to  2006.  The  Company  has  also  entered
into   employee   bargaining   agreements   with   an   additional   66   employees   who   represent   themselves,   which   have renewal   dates
ranging  to  2005.  The  Company  believes  that  its  relationship  with  its  employees  is  good.

AUSTRALIAN  OPERATIONS (Equity  Accounting)

The  Australian  Railroad  Group  (ARG),  which  is  50%  owned  by  the  Company  and  50%  owned  by  Wesfarmers  Limited,  is  reflected
in the   Company’s   statement   of   income   using   the   equity   method   of   accounting.   In   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003,   ARG
contributed  $10.4 million,  or  36.1%,  of the  Company’s  total  net  income.

ARG  is  composed  of  three  principal  subsidiaries,  Australia  Southern  Railroad  Pty  Ltd  (ASR),  Australia  Western  Railroad  Pty  Ltd
(AWR),  and  Westnet  Rail  Pty  Ltd  (Westnet).  Both  AWR  and  ASR  operate  locomotives  and  rail  cars  to  provide  rail  freight  service  to
customers  in  the  states  of  Western  Australia  and  South  Australia,  respectively.  In  Western  Australia,  Westnet  is  the  owner  of  the
standard   gauge   and   narrow   gauge   track   infrastructure   and   charges   track   access   fees   to   rail   operators   that   use   its   track
infrastructure,  including  AWR. ARG  also  has  track  access  agreements  with  entities  owned  by  the  Commonwealth  government,
the  New  South  Wales  government  and  the  Queensland  government,  thereby  providing  ARG  with  the  ability  to  provide  rail  freight
service  across  the  Australian  continent.  In  November 2003,  ARG  added  a  new  customer  in  the  State  of  New  South  Wales.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

7

Australian  Customers

ARG  currently  serves  over  75  customers.  A  significant  portion  of  ARG’s  revenues  is  attributable  to  customers  operating  in  the
grain,  ores  and  minerals  and  alumina  industries.  ARG’s  largest  ten  customers  accounted  for  approximately  70%,  69%  and  67%
of  its  revenues  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001,  respectively.  ARG’s  largest  customer,  AWB  Limited  (a
major   marketer   and   exporter   of   Australian   wheat),   accounted   for   20%,   22%   and   22%   of   its   revenues   for   the   years   ended
December 31,  2003,  2002,  and  2001.  ARG  typically  ships  freight  under  transportation  contracts,  which  vary  from  customer  to
customer  and  in  duration  from  one  to  ten  years,  subject  to  certain  review  and  extension  provisions.

Australian  Commodities

The   following   table   provides   ARG’s   freight   revenues,   carloads   and   average   freight   revenues   per   carload   for   the   years   ended
December 31,  2003  and  2002.  (All  references  to  currency  amounts  included  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K,  including  the
financial  statements,  are  in  U.S.  dollars  unless  specifically  noted  otherwise):

Australian  Railroad  Group  Freight  Revenues  and  Carloads  by  Commodity  Group
Years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands,  except  average  per  carload)

Commodity Group

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

Freight Revenues

Carloads

Average
Freight
Revenues
Per
Carload

2003

2002

Grain

$ 61,125

29.5% $ 53,590

30.5% 158,462

18.7% 177,651

20.5% $386

$302

Other Ores and Minerals

Iron Ore

Alumina

Bauxite

Hook and Pull(Haulage)

Gypsum

Other

Total

48,782

36,238

16,459

11,363

5,498

2,915

23.6%

17.5%

8.0%

5.5%

2.7%

1.4%

38,075

27,038

13,828

10,125

8,343

2,327

21.7% 107,257

12.7%

99,816

15.4% 179,711

21.2% 177,619

7.9% 153,685

18.1% 151,756

5.8% 126,865

15.0% 127,892

4.8%

1.3%

13,337

45,548

62,865

1.6%

5.4%

7.3%

24,628

42,389

63,724

11.5%

20.5%

17.5%

14.8%

2.9%

4.9%

7.4%

24,543

11.8%

22,114

12.6%

$206,923

100.0% $175,440

100.0% 847,730

100.0% 865,475

100.0%

455

202

107

90

412

64

390

244

381

152

91

79

339

55

347

203

Australian  Non-Freight  Revenues

ARG’s  non-freight  railroad  revenues  consist  of  rail  services  such  as  track  access  fees  charged  to  other  railroads,  services  related
to  the  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  rail  line  construction,  including  the  movement  of  construction  materials  and  operations  manage-
ment,  diesel  fuel  sales  to  other  railroads,  and  other  ancillary  revenues.  The  following  table  compares  ARG’s  non-freight  revenues
for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

Australian  Railroad  Group  Non-Freight  Revenues  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands)

Third party track access fees

Alice Springs to Darwin Line

Fuel sales

Other operating income

Total non-freight revenues

Australian  Employees

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

$18,042

42.3% $13,744

12,103

8,083

4,420

28.4%

19.0%

10.3%

13,421

4,636

3,826

38.6%

37.7%

13.0%

10.7%

$42,648

100.0% $35,627

100.0%

As  of  December 31,  2003,  ARG  had  1,051  full-time  employees.  Of  this  total,  approximately  28.5%  are  employed  under  collective
bargaining  agreements.  In  South  Australia,  ARG  has  one  collective  bargaining  agreement  that  expires  in  September 2004.  ARG  is
close   to   reaching   agreement   on   a   collective   Enterprise   Bargaining   Agreement   covering   the   majority   of   Western   Australian
employees.  ARG  believes  that  its  relationship  with  its  employees  is  good.

8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

NORTH  AMERICAN  SAFETY

The  Company’s  safety  program  involves  all  employees  and  focuses  on  the  prevention  of  accidents  and  injuries.  The  Senior  Vice
President   of   each Region   is   accountable   for   the   results   of   the   program.   Each   region   has   an   officer   responsible   for   day-to-day
program  administration. The  Company  maintains  a  corporate-wide  safety program  facilitated  by  the  Vice  President  &  Chief  Safety
Officer.   A   Compliance   Officer   and   a   Safety   Director   report   to   the   Chief   Safety   Officer.   The   Company   works   continuously   to
comply  with  all  federal,  state,  and  local  government  regulations.  Operating  personnel  are  trained  and  certified  in  train  operations,
the  transportation  of  hazardous  materials,  safety  and  operating  rules,  and  governmental  rules  and  regulations.

NORTH  AMERICAN  INSURANCE

The  Company  has  obtained  insurance  coverage  for  losses  arising  from  personal  injury  and  for  property  damage  in  the  event  of
derailments   or   other   accidents   or   occurrences.   The   liability   policies   have   self-insured   retentions   ranging   from   $200,000   to
$500,000  per  occurrence.  In  addition,  the  Company  maintains  excess  liability  policies  which  provide  supplemental  coverage  for
losses  in  excess  of  primary  policy  limits.  With  respect  to  the  transportation  of  hazardous  commodities,  the  Company’s  liability
policy   covers   sudden   releases   of   hazardous   materials,   including   expenses   related   to   evacuation.   Personal   injuries   associated
with   grade   crossing   accidents   are   also   covered   under   the   Company’s   liability   policies.   The   Company   also   maintains   property
damage  coverage,  subject  to  a  standard  pollution  sub-limit  and  self-insured  retentions  ranging  from  $100,000  to  $500,000.

Employees  of  the  Company’s  United  States  railroads  are  covered  by  the  Federal  Employers’  Liability  Act  (FELA),  a  fault-based
system   under   which   injuries   and   deaths   of   railroad   employees   are   settled   by   negotiation   or   litigation.   FELA-related   claims   are
covered  under  the  Company’s  liability  insurance  policies.  Employees  of  the  Company’s  industrial  switching  business  are  covered
under  workers’  compensation  policies.

The  Company  believes  its  insurance  coverage  is  adequate  in  light  of  its  experience  and  the  experience  of  the  rail  industry.

NORTH  AMERICAN  COMPETITION

In  acquiring  rail  properties,  the  Company  generally  competes  with  other  short  line  and  regional  railroad  operators.  Competition
for   rail   properties   is   based   primarily   upon   price and   the   seller’s   assessment   of   the   buyer’s   railroad   operating   expertise   and
financing   capability.   The   Company   believes   its   established   reputation   as   a   successful   acquiror   and   operator   of   short   line   rail
properties,   combined   with   its   managerial   and   financial   resources,   effectively   positions   it   to   take   advantage   of   acquisition
opportunities.

Each  of  the  Company’s  railroads  is  typically  the  only  rail  carrier  directly  serving  its  customers;  however,  the  Company’s  railroads
compete  directly  with  other  modes  of  transportation,  principally  motor  carriers,  and,  on  some  routes,  ship,  barge  and  pipeline
operators.  Competition  is  based  primarily  upon  the  rate  charged  and  the  transit  time  required,  as  well  as  the  quality  and  reliability
of  the  service  provided,  for  an  origin-to-destination  transportation  service.  To  the  extent  other  carriers  are  involved  in  transport-
ing   a   shipment,   the   Company   cannot   control   the   cost   and   quality   of   such   service.   To   the   extent   that   highway   competition   is
involved,   the   effectiveness   of   that   competition   is   affected   by   government   policy   with   respect   to   fuel   and   other   taxes,   highway
tolls,  and  permissible  truck  sizes  and  weights.

To   a   lesser   degree,   the   Company   also   faces   competition   with   similar   products   made   in   other   areas,   a   kind   of   competition
commonly  known  as  ‘‘geographic  competition.’’  For  example,  a  paper  producer  may  choose  to  increase  or  decrease  production
at  a  specific  plant  served  by  one  of  the  Company’s  railroads  depending  on  the  relative  competitiveness  of  that  plant  versus  paper
plants  in  other  locations.

United  States

The  Company’s  U.S.  railroads  are  subject  to  regulation  by:

REGULATION

(cid:2) the  Surface  Transportation  Board  (STB),

(cid:2) the  Federal  Railroad  Administration,

(cid:2) state  departments  of  transportation,  and

(cid:2) some  state  and  local  regulatory  agencies.

The  STB  is  the  successor  to  certain  regulatory  functions  previously  administered  by  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission  (ICC).
Established  by  the  ICC  Termination  Act  of  1995,  the  STB  has  jurisdiction  over,  among  other  things,  freight  rates  (where  there  is
no   effective   competition),   extension   or   abandonment   of   rail   lines,   the   acquisition   of   rail   lines,   and   consolidation,   merger   or
acquisition  of  control  of  rail  common  carriers.  In  limited  circumstances,  the  STB  may  condition  its  approval  of  an  acquisition  upon
the   acquiror   of   a   railroad   agreeing   to   provide   severance   benefits   to   certain   subsequently   terminated   employees.   The   Federal
Railroad  Administration  has  jurisdiction  over  safety.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

9

Canada

St.   Lawrence   &   Atlantic   Railroad   (Quebec)   is   subject   to   the   jurisdiction   of   the   federal   government   of   Canada   while   Quebec
Gatineau   Railway   and   Huron   Central   Railway   are   subject   to   the   jurisdiction   of   provincial   governments   of   Quebec   and   Ontario,
respectively.

Federally  regulated  railways  fall  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Canada  Transportation  Agency  (CTA) and  Transport  Canada  (TC) and
are  subject  to  the  provisions  of  the  Railway  Safety  Act.  The  CTA  has  power  to  regulate  construction  and  operation  of  railways,
financial  transactions  of  railway  companies,  all  aspects  of  rates,  tariffs  and  services,  and  the  transferring  and  discontinuing  of  the
operation  of  railway  lines.  TC  administers  the  Railway  Safety  Act  which  ensures  that  federally  regulated  railway  companies  abide
by   all   regulations   with   respect   to   engineering   standards   governing   the   construction   or   alteration   of   railway   works   and   the
operation  and  maintenance  standards  of  railway  works  and  equipment.

Provincially   regulated   railways   operate   within   the   boundary   of   one   province   and   hold   a   Certificate   of   Fitness   delivered   by   a
provincial  authority.  In  the  Province  of  Quebec,  the  Fitness  Certificate  is  delivered  by  the  Transport  Commission  of  Quebec,  while
in  Ontario,  under  the  Short  Line  Railways  Act,  a  license  has  to  be  obtained  from  the  Registrar  of  Short  Line  Railways.  Construc-
tion,  operation  and  discontinuance  of  operation  are  regulated,  as  well  as  railway  services.

Australia

In   Australia,   regulation   of   rail   safety   is   generally   governed   by   State   legislation   and   administered   by   State   regulatory   agencies.
Regulation  of  access  is  governed  by  overriding  Federal  legislation  with  State  based  regimes  operating  in  compliance  with  that
legislation.   ARG’s   assets   are   therefore   subject   to   the   regulatory   regimes   governing   safety   in   each   of   Western   Australia,   South
Australia,  the  Northern  Territory,  Victoria  and  New  South  Wales.  In  addition,  with  respect  to  access  to  rail  infrastructure,  ARG’s
Australian  assets  are  subject  to  individual  access  regimes  established  under  Part  IIIA  of  the  Trade  Practices  Act  1974.

ARG’s  interstate  access  includes  the  standard  gauge  tracks  linking  Wodonga  (in  Victoria),  Melbourne  (in  Victoria),  Adelaide  (in
South   Australia),   Broken   Hill   (in   New   South   Wales),   Tarcoola   (in   South   Australia)   and   Kalgoorlie   (in   Western   Australia).   The
interstate  network  is  part  of  the  larger  standard  gauge  network  linking  all  capital  cities  in  Australia  from  Brisbane  to  Perth,  as  well
as  Broken  Hill  in  New  South  Wales  and  Alice  Springs  in  the  Northern  Territory.  Those  parts  of  this  larger  standard  gauge  network
which   are   not   covered   by   the   interstate   network   are   governed   by   the   various   State   access   regimes   and   the   national   access
regime.

Mexico

In  Mexico,  the  Secretary  of  Communications  and  Transport  (SCT) has  jurisdiction  over,  among  other  things:

(cid:2) policies  and  programs  related  to  the  railroad  system,

(cid:2) the  granting  of  concessions,

(cid:2) the  regulation  of  the  concessions  and  resolution  of  any  issues  regarding  amendments  or  terminations  to  the  concessions,

(cid:2) the  regulation  of  tariff  application,  and

(cid:2) the  imposition  of  sanctions  when  operators  have  not  complied  with  the  terms  of  a  concession.

A  Mexican  railroad  is  also  subject  to  the  Mexican  Foreign  Investments  Law  and  the  Federal  Law  of  Economic  Competition.  The
Foreign   Investments   Law   governs   the   ownership   of   Mexican   Railroads   by   foreign   entities,   such   as   the   Company’s   Mexican
railroad,  while  the  Law  of  Economic  Competition  is  an  antitrust  statute.

ENVIRONMENTAL  MATTERS

The   Company’s   operations   are   subject   to   various   federal,   state,   provincial   and   local   laws   and   regulations   relating   to   the
protection  of  the  environment.  In  the  United  States,  these  environmental  laws  and  regulations,  which  are  implemented  principally
by   the   Environmental   Protection   Agency   and   comparable   state   agencies,   govern   the   management   of   hazardous   wastes,   the
discharge   of   pollutants   into   the   air   and   into   surface   and   underground   waters,   and   the   manufacture   and   disposal   of   certain
substances.  Similarly,  in  Canada,  these  functions  are  administered  at  the  federal  level  by  Environment  Canada  and  the  Depart-
ment   of   Transport   and   comparable   agencies   at   the   provincial   level.   In   Mexico,   these   functions   are   administered   at   the   federal
level  by  the  Secretary  of  Environment,  Natural  Resources  and  Fisheries  and  the  Attorney  General  for  Environmental  Protection,
and   by   comparable   agencies   at   the   state   level.   In   Australia,   these   functions   are   administered   primarily   by   the   Department   of
Transport   on   a   federal   level   and   by   environmental   protection   agencies   at   the   state   level.   There   are   no   material   environmental
claims  currently  pending  or,  to  the  Company’s  knowledge,  threatened  against  the  Company  or  any  of  its  railroads.  In  addition,
the   Company   believes   that   the   operations   of   its   railroads   are   in   material   compliance   with   current   laws   and   regulations.   The
Company   estimates   that   any   expenses   incurred   in   maintaining   compliance   with   current   laws   and   regulations   will   not   have   a
material  effect  on  the  Company’s  earnings  or  capital  expenditures.

In  Mexico,  the  Company’s  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Compa ˜n´ıa  de  Ferrocarriles  Chiapas-Mayab,  S.A.  de  C.V.,  was  awarded  a  30-
year  concession  to  operate  certain  railways  owned  by  the  government-owned  rail  company.  Under  the  terms  of  the  concession

1 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

agreement,   the   federal   railway   company   remains   responsible   for   remediation   of   all   contamination   that   occurred   prior   to   the
execution  date  of  the  concession  agreement.

The  Commonwealth  of  Australia  has  acknowledged  that  certain  portions  of  the  leasehold  and  freehold  land  acquired  under  the
sale   and   purchase   agreement   by   ASR   contains   contamination   arising   from   activities   associated   with   previous   operators.   The
Commonwealth  has  carried  out  certain  remediation  work  to  meet  existing  South  Australian  environmental  standards  which  reflect
the  purpose  for  which  the  land  was  used  at  the  date  of  the  Sale  and  Purchase  Agreement.

The   Company’s   operations   and   financial   condition   are   subject   to   certain   risks   that   could   cause   actual   operating   and   financial
results   to   differ   materially   from   those   expressed   or   forecast   in   the   Company’s   forward-looking   statements.   For   a   complete
description  of  the  Company’s  general  risk  factors  including  risk  factors  of  foreign  operations,  see  Item 7  Management’s  Discus-
sion  and  Analysis  elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K.

RISK  FACTORS

FORWARD-LOOKING  STATEMENTS

The  information  contained  in  this Annual Report  on  Form 10-K,  including  Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  Item 7  contains
forward-looking  statements  within  the  meaning  of  Section 27A  of  the  Securities  Act  of  1933,  as  amended,  and  Section 21E  of  the
Securities   Exchange   Act   of   1934,   as   amended,   regarding   future   events   and   future   performance   of   Genesee   &   Wyoming   Inc.
Words  such  as  ‘‘anticipates,’’  ‘‘intends,’’  ‘‘plans,’’  ‘‘believes,’’  ‘‘seeks,’’  ‘‘expects,’’  ‘‘estimates,’’  variations  of  these  words  and
similar   expressions   are   intended   to   identify   these   forward-looking   statements.   These   statements   are   not   guarantees   of   future
performance  and  are  subject  to  certain  risks,  uncertainties  and  assumptions  that  are  difficult  to  forecast.  Actual  results  may  differ
materially   from   those   expressed   or   forecast   in   these   forward-looking   statements.   These   risks   and   uncertainties   include   those
noted  under  the  caption  ‘‘Risk  Factors’’ in  Item 7,  as  well  as  those  noted  in  documents  that  the  Company  files  from  time  to  time
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,   such   as   Forms   10-K   and   10-Q   which   contain   additional   important   factors   that
could  cause  actual  results  to  differ  from  current  expectations  and  from  the  forward-looking  statements  contained  herein.

Item  2. Properties

The   Company,   through   its   subsidiaries   and   unconsolidated   affiliates,   currently   has   interests   in   thirty-two   railroads   of   which
twenty-four  are  in  the  United  States,  three  are  in  Canada,  three  are  in  Australia,  one  is  in  Mexico  and  one  is  in  Bolivia.  These  rail
properties  typically  consist  of  the  track  and  the  underlying  land.  Real  estate  adjacent  to  the  railroad  rights-of-way  is  generally
retained  by  the  seller,  and  the  Company’s  holdings  of  such  property  are  not  material.  Similarly,  the  seller  typically  retains  mineral
rights  and  rights  to  grant  fiber  optic  and  other  easements  in  the  properties  acquired  by  the  Company’s  railroads.  Several  of  the
Company’s  railroads  are  operated  under  terms  of  leases  or  operating  licenses  in  which  the  Company  does  not  assume  ownership
of  the  track  and  the  underlying  land.

The  Company’s  railroads  operate  over  approximately  8,100  miles  of  track  that  is  owned,  jointly-owned  or  leased  by  the  Company
or   its   affiliates.   The   Company’s   or   its   affiliates’   railroads   also   operate,   through   various   trackage   rights   agreements,   over more
than  3,000  miles  of  track  that  is  owned  or  leased  by  others.

The  following  table  sets  forth  certain  information  as  of  December 31,  2003  with  respect  to  the  Company’s  railroads:

Railroad and Location

UNITED STATES:

Track Miles

Structure

Connecting Carriers(1)

Allegheny & Eastern Railroad, Inc. (ALY) Pennsylvania

134(2)

Owned

BPRR, NS, CSX

Bradford Industrial Rail, Inc. (BR) Pennsylvania

4(3)

Owned

BPRR

Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. (BPRR) New York, Pennsylvania

320(4)

Owned/Leased

ALY, BLE, BR, CN, CP,
CSX, NS, PS, RSR, AVR

The Dansville & Mount Morris Railroad Company

(DMM) New York

Genesee and Wyoming Railroad Company

(GNWR) New York

Pittsburg & Shawmut Railroad, Inc. (PS) Pennsylvania

Rochester & Southern Railroad, Inc. (RSR) New York

Illinois & Midland Railroad, Inc. (IMR) Illinois

8

Owned

GNWR

26(5)

Owned(5)

CP, DMM, RSR, NS,
CSX

181(6)

Owned

BPRR, NS

66(7)

97(8)

Owned

Owned

BPRR, CP, GNWR, CSX

BNSF, IAIS, IC, NS,
PPU, TPW, UP

BNSF, UP, WPRR,
POTB

Portland & Western Railroad, Inc. (PNWR) Oregon

287(9)

Owned/Leased

Willamette & Pacific Railroad, Inc. (WPRR) Oregon

185(10) Leased

UP, PNWR, HLSC

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

1 1

Railroad and Location

Track Miles

Structure

Connecting Carriers(1)

Louisiana & Delta Railroad, Inc. (LDRR) Louisiana

Commonwealth Railway, Inc. (CWRY) Virginia

Talleyrand Terminal Railroad Company, Inc.

(TTR) Florida

Corpus Christi Terminal Railroad, Inc. (CCPN) Texas

Golden Isles Terminal Railroad, Inc. (GITM) Georgia

Savannah Port Terminal Railroad, Inc. (SAPT) Georgia

South Buffalo Railway (SB) New York

St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad Company (SLR) Maine, New Hampshire

and Vermont

York Railway Company (YRC) Pennsylvania

Utah Railway Company (URC) Utah

Salt Lake City Southern Railroad Company (SLCS) Utah

Chattahoochee Industrial Railroad (CIRR) Georgia

Arkansas Louisiana and Mississippi Railroad Company (ALM) Arkansas, Louisiana

Fordyce & Princeton Railroad Company (F&P) Arkansas

CANADA:

St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad (Quebec) Inc. (SLQ) Canada

Huron Central Railway Inc. (HCR) Canada

Quebec Gatineau Railway Inc. (QGRY) Canada

MEXICO:

87(11) Owned/Leased

UP, BNSF

17(13) Owned/Leased

NS

10(14) Leased

26(15) Leased

13(16) Leased

1(17) Leased

52

Owned

165(18) Owned

40(18) Owned

44(19) Owned

2(20) Owned

15(21) Owned

52(21) Owned

57(21) Owned

95(18) Owned

179(22) Leased

NS, CSX

UP, BNSF, TM

CSX, NS

CSX, NS

BPRR, CSX, NS CP, CN

GRS, SLQ

CSX, NS

UP, BNSF

UP, BNSF

CSX, NS

UP, KCS

UP, KCS

CP, CN

CP, WC

293(23) Owned/Leased

CP, CN

Compania de Ferrocarriles Chiapas-Mayab, S.A. de C.V. (FCCM)

960(24) Leased

Ferrosur

AUSTRALIA (equity accounting): Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (ARG)

4,186(25) Owned/Leased

BOLIVIA (equity accounting): Ferroviaria Oriental, S.A. (Oriental)

600(26) Leased

General Belgrano,
Novoeste

(1) See Legend of Connecting Carriers following this table.

(2)

In addition, ALY operates by trackage rights over 3 miles of NS. ALY merged with BPRR on January 1, 2004.

(3)

In addition, BR operates by trackage rights over 14 miles of BPRR. BR merged with BPRR on January 1, 2004.

(4)

Includes 92 miles under perpetual leases and 41 miles and 9 miles under leases expiring in 2027 and 2090, respectively. In addition, BPRR
operates by trackage rights over 14 miles of CSX under an agreement expiring in 2018, and 44 miles of NS under an agreement expiring in
2027.  The  Company  is  seeking  to  rationalize  approximately  58  miles  of  owned  track  that  parallels  track  under  the  NS  trackage  rights
agreement.

(5) The GNWR is now operated by RSR.

(6)

In addition, PS operates over 13 miles pursuant to an operating contract. PS merged with BPRR on January 1, 2004.

(7)

In addition, RSR has a haulage contract over 52 miles of CP.

(8)

In addition, IMR operates by trackage rights over 15 miles of IC, 9 miles of PPU and 5 miles of UP.

(9)

Includes 53 miles under lease expiring in 2015 with a 10-year renewal unless terminated by either party, 53 miles formerly under lease which
was purchased in November, 1997, and is operated under a rail service easement, 92 miles which was purchased in July, 1997, and beginning
in December 2002, 76 miles under lease expiring in 2017. In addition, PNWR operates by trackage rights over 2 miles of UP and 4 miles of
POTB.

(10) All under lease expiring in 2013, with renewal options subject to both parties’ consent. In addition, WPRR operates over 41 miles of UP under a

concurrent trackage rights agreement.

(11)

Includes  14  miles  under  a  lease  expiring  in  2011.  In  addition,  LDRR  operates  by  trackage  rights  over  91  miles  of  UP  under  an  agreement
terminable by either party after 1997 and has a haulage contract with M.A. Patout & Sons over 4 miles of track.

(12) All leased on a month-to-month basis under a Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement which commenced in 1989.

(13)

Includes 12.5 miles under lease expiring in 2009.

(14) All under lease expiring in 2005.

(15) All under lease expiring in 2007.

(16) All under lease expiring in 2006.

(17) All under lease expiring in 2006.

(18) Subsidiary of Emons Transportation Group, Inc., acquired February 22, 2002.

1 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

(19) URC was acquired August 28, 2002. In addition, URC operates by trackage rights over 326 miles of UP.

(20) Subsidiary of Utah Railway Company, acquired August 28, 2002. In addition, SLCS operates by trackage rights over 21 miles of UP.

(21) All acquired on December 31, 2003.

(22) All under lease expiring in 2017, with renewal options subject to both parties’ consent.

(23) Consists of 275 miles which are owned and 18 which are under lease expiring in 2017, with renewal options subject to both parties’ consent. In

addition, QGRY operates by trackage rights over 27 miles of CP.

(24) All  under  a  30-year  concession  agreement  operating  on  track  structure  which  is  owned  by  a  government  company.  In  addition,  FCCM

operates by trackage rights over 210 miles on Ferrosur (another privatized rail concession) and a government-owned line.

(25) ARG is composed of three principal subsidiaries, Australia Southern Railroad Pty Ltd (ASR), Australia Western Railroad Pty Ltd (AWR), and
WestNet Rail Pty Ltd (Westnet). ARG leases track infrastructure from the State of Western Australia for 49 years and from the State of South
Australia for 50 years. In Western Australia, ARG’s operations are composed of AWR, which operates locomotives and rail cars to provide rail
freight service to its customers, and Westnet, which owns the track infrastructure over which rail operations, including AWR, operate. ARG also
has track access agreements with entities owned by the Commonwealth government, the New South Wales government and the Queensland
government, thereby providing ARG with the ability to provide rail freight service across the Australian continent.

(26) All  under  a  40-year  concession  agreement  operating  on  track  structure  which  is  owned  by  the  state-owned  rail  company  Red  Ferroviario

Oriental.

Legend of Connecting Carriers

Allegheny Valley Railroad
Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
Canadian National
Canadian Pacific Railway
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Guilford Rail System
Hampton Railway
Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd.
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Kansas City Southern
Norfolk Southern Corp.
Port of Tillamook Bay Railroad
Peoria & Pekin Union Railway
The Texas Mexican Railway Company
Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway Corp.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Wisconsin Central

AVR
BLE
BNSF
CN
CP
CSX
GRS
HLSC
IAIS
IC
KCS
NS
POTB
PPU
TM
TPW
UP
WC

EQUIPMENT

As  of  December 31,  2003,  rolling  stock  of  the  Company’s  North  American  operations  consisted  of  345  locomotives  of  which  235
were  owned  and  110  were  leased,  and  8,069  freight  cars,  of  which  680  were  owned  and  7,389  were  leased.

Item  3. Legal  Proceedings

The   Company   is   a   defendant   in   certain   lawsuits   resulting   from   its   operations.   Management   believes   that   the   Company   has
adequate   provisions   in   the   financial   statements   for   any   expected   liabilities   which   may   result   from   disposition   of   such   lawsuits.
While  it  is  possible  that  some  of  the  foregoing  matters  may  be  resolved  at  a  cost  greater  than  that  provided  for,  it  is  the  opinion  of
management   that   the   ultimate   liability,   if   any,   will   not   be   material   to   the   Company’s operating   results,   financial   condition   or
liquidity.

Item  4. Submission  of  Matters  to  a  Vote  of  Security  Holders

None

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

1 3

PART II

Item  5. Market  for  Registrant’s  Common  Equity  and  Related  Stockholder  Matters

Stock  Market  Results. On  June 24,  1996,  the  Company’s  Class A  Common  Stock  began  publicly  trading  and  was  quoted  on  the
Nasdaq  National  Market  until  September 26,  2002,  under  the  trading  symbol  GNWR.  On  September 27,  2002,  the  Company’s
Class A  Common  Stock  began  publicly  trading  on  the  New  York  Stock  Exchange  under  the  trading  symbol  GWR.  On  February 11,
2004,  February 14,  2002  and  May 1,  2001  the  Company  announced  three-for-two  common  stock  splits  in  the  form  of  50%  stock
dividends.  All  share,  per  share  and  par  value  amounts  presented  herein  have  been  restated  to  reflect  the  retroactive  effect  of  the
three   stock   splits.   The   tables   below   show   the   range   of   high   and   low   actual   trade   prices   for   the   Company’s   Class  A   Common
Stock  during  each  quarterly  period  of  2003,  2002  and  2001.

Year Ended December 31, 2003

4th Quarter
3rd Quarter
2nd Quarter
1st Quarter

Year Ended December 31, 2002

4th Quarter
3rd Quarter
2nd Quarter
1st Quarter

Year Ended December 31, 2001

4th Quarter
3rd Quarter
2nd Quarter
1st Quarter

High

Low

$23.13
$17.15
$14.29
$14.07

$15.67
$13.60
$10.26
$ 8.47

High

Low

$15.47
$16.11
$17.53
$15.85

$12.00
$10.47
$13.17
$12.80

High

Low

$14.71
$11.98
$ 9.73
$ 8.71

$10.00
$ 8.23
$ 6.02
$ 6.00

The  Company’s  Class B  Common  Stock  is  not  publicly  traded.

Dividends. The  Company  did  not  pay  cash  dividends  in  2003,  2002  or  2001.  The  Company  does  not  intend  to  pay  cash  dividends
for  the  foreseeable  future  and  intends  to  retain  earnings,  if  any,  for  future  operation  and  expansion  of  the  Company’s  business.
Any   determination   to   pay   dividends   in   the   future   will   be   at   the   discretion   of   the   Company’s   Board   of   Directors   and   will   be
dependent   upon   the   Company’s   results   of   operations,   financial   condition,   contractual   restrictions   and   other   factors   deemed
relevant  by  the  Board  of  Directors.

Number  of  Holders. On  March 2,  2004  there  were  154  holders  of  record  of  the  Company’s  Class A  Common  Stock  and  9  holders
of  record  of  the  Company’s  Class B  Common  Stock.

Recent  Sales  of  Unregistered  Securities. During  2003,  the  Company  issued  the  securities  listed  below  which  were  not  registered
under  the  Securities  Act  of  1933,  as  amended  (the  Act).  Each  of  such  issuances  was  made  by  private  offering  in  reliance  on  the
exemption  from  the  registration  provisions  of  the  Act  provided  by  Section 4(2)  of  the  Act.  The  facts  relied  upon  to  establish  such
exemption  included  the  recipients’  representations  as  to  their  investment  intent  with  respect  to  such securities  and  restrictions
on  the  transfer  of  such securities  imposed  by  the  Company.

(1) On January 11, 2003, the Company issued to one of its directors, for no additional consideration, options under the Genesee & Wyoming
Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors to purchase an aggregate of 3,375 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of
$13.95 per share. The shares issuable upon exercise of such options are the subject of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Act.

(2) On May 29, 2003, the Company issued to one of its employees, for no additional consideration, options under the Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
1996 Stock Option Plan to purchase an aggregate of 22,500 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $13.59 per share. The
shares issuable upon exercise of such options are the subject of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Act.

(3) On May 29, 2003, the Company issued to four of its directors, for no additional consideration, options under the Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors to purchase an aggregate of 13,500 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of
$13.59 per share. The shares issuable upon exercise of such options are the subject of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Act.

(4)  On  July  31,  2003,  the  Company  issued  to  an  aggregate  of  203  of  its  employees,  for  no  additional  consideration,  options  under  the
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan to purchase an aggregate of 442,377 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price
of $14.94 per share, and 6,693 shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $16.43 per share. The shares issuable upon exercise
of such options are the subject of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Act.

(5) On August 21, 2003, the Company issued to two of its directors, for no additional consideration, options under the Genesee & Wyoming
Inc.  Stock  Option  Plan  for  Outside  Directors  to  purchase  an  aggregate  of  6,750  shares  of  Class  A  Common  Stock  at  an  exercise  price  of
$15.59 per share. The shares issuable upon exercise of such options are the subject of a Registration Statement on Form S-8 under the Act.

See  Item 12  for  the  equity  compensation  plan  table  required  by  this  Item  5.

1 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Item  6. Selected  Financial  Data

The  following  selected  consolidated  income  statement  data  and  selected  consolidated  balance  sheet  data  of  the  Company  as  of
and  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002,  2001,  2000,  and  1999,  have  been  derived  from  the  Company’s  consolidated
financial  statements.  All  of  the  information  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  related
notes  included  elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K.  See  also  Item 7.

Income Statement Data(1):
Operating revenues

Operating expenses

Income from operations

Interest expense

Gain on sale of 50% equity in Australian operations(1)

Other income, net

Income before income taxes and equity earnings

Income taxes

Equity earnings (losses)

Net income

Preferred stock dividends and cost accretion

Net income available to common stockholders

Basic earnings per common share:

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
2001

2000

2002

2003

1999

$244,827

$209,540

$173,576

$206,530

$175,586

208,522

177,533

150,622

182,818

152,828

32,007

22,954

23,712

22,758

(8,139)

(10,049)

(11,233)

(8,886)

—

726

2,985

497

24,594

16,387

6,166

8,863

8,761

9,774

25,607

1,172

10,062

1,549

24,090

10,569

411

—

1,292

15,164

2,013

(618)

19,084

13,932

12,533

957

52

—

$ 27,449

$ 24,435

$ 18,127

$ 13,880

$ 12,533

36,305

(8,646)

—

986

28,645

10,567

10,641

28,719

1,270

Net income available to common stockholders

$

1.21

$

1.11

$

1.15

$

0.95

$

0.83

Weighted average number of shares of common stock

22,700

22,056

15,764

14,669

15,156

Diluted earnings per common share:

Net income

$

1.07

$

0.97

$

0.98

$

0.92

$

0.82

Weighted average number of shares of common stock and equivalents

26,768

26,378

19,375

15,141

15,323

BALANCE SHEET DATA AT YEAR END(1):

Total assets

Total debt

Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

Stockholders’ equity

$627,173

$514,859

$402,519

$338,383

$303,940

158,022

125,417

23,994

23,980

60,591

23,808

267,086

209,621

185,663

104,801

108,376

18,849

94,732

—

81,829

(1) The Company has completed a number of recent acquisitions. Because of variations in the structure, timing and size of these acquisitions, the
Company’s results of operations in any reporting period may not be directly comparable to its results of operations in other reporting periods.
See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete description of recent acquisitions.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

1 5

Item  7. Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations

The  following  discussion  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  and  related  notes  included
elsewhere  in  this  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K.

General

The  Company  is  a  holding  company  whose  subsidiaries  and  unconsolidated  affiliates  own  and/or  operate  short  line  and  regional
freight   railroads   and   provide   related   rail   services   in   North   America,   South   America   and   Australia.   The   Company   also   provides
freight  car  switching  and  related  services  to  United  States  industrial  companies  with  railroad  facilities  within  their  complexes.  The
Company  generates  revenues  primarily  from  the  movement  of  freight  over  track  owned  or  operated  by  its  railroads.  The  Company
also  generates  non-freight  revenues  primarily  by  providing rail  car  switching  and other ancillary  rail  services.

The   Company’s   operating   expenses   include   wages   and   benefits,   equipment   rents   (including   car   hire),   purchased   services,
depreciation  and  amortization,  diesel  fuel,  casualties  and  insurance,  materials,  net  (gain) loss  on  sale  and  impairment  of  assets,
and  other  expenses.  Car  hire  is  a  charge  paid  by  a  railroad  to  the  owners  of  railcars  used  by  that  railroad  in  moving  freight.  Other
expenses   generally   include   property   and   other   non-income   taxes,   professional   services,   communication   and   data   processing
costs,  and  general  overhead  expense.

When  comparing  the  Company’s  results  of  operations  from  one  reporting  period  to  another,  the  following  factors  should  be  taken
into   consideration.   The   Company   has   historically   experienced   fluctuations   in   revenues   and   expenses   such   as   one-time   freight
moves,   customer   plant   expansions   and   shut-downs,   sale   of   land   and   equipment,   accidents   and   derailments.   In   periods   when
these   events   occur,   results   of   operations   are   not   easily   comparable   to   other   periods.   Also,   the   Company   has   completed   a
number  of  recent  acquisitions.  On  December 31,  2003,  the  Company  completed  the  acquisition  of  the  Chattahoochee  Industrial
Railroad,  Arkansas  Louisiana  and  Mississippi  Railroad  and  Fordyce  &  Princeton  Railroad.  The  Company’s  other  recent  acquisi-
tions   include   Utah   Railway   Company   in   August  2002,   Emons   Transportation   Group,   Inc.   in   February  2002,   and   South   Buffalo
Railway  Company  in  October 2001.  Because  of  variations  in  the  structure,  timing  and  size  of  these  acquisitions  and  differences  in
economics  among  the  Company’s  railroads  resulting  from  differences  in  the  rates  and  other  material  terms  established  through
negotiation,   the   Company’s   results   of   operations   in   any   reporting   period   may   not   be   directly   comparable   to   its   results   of
operations  in  other  reporting  periods.

Certain  of  the  Company’s  commodity  shipments  are  sensitive  to  general  economic  conditions  in  North  America,  including  paper
products  in  Canada,  chemicals  in  the  United  States,  and  cement  in  Mexico.  However,  shipments  of  other  important  commodities
such  as  coal  and  salt  are  less  affected  by  economic  conditions  and  are  more  closely  affected  by  the  weather.

On  February 11,  2004,  February 14,  2002  and  May 1,  2001,  the  Company  announced  three-for-two  common  stock  splits  in  the
form  of  50%  stock  dividends  to  be  distributed  on  March 15,  2004  to  shareholders  of  record  as  of  February  27,  2004,  March 14,
2002  to  shareholders  of  record  as  of  February 28,  2002,  and  on  June 15,  2001  to  shareholders  of  record  as  of  May 31,  2001,
respectively.  All  share,  per  share  and  par  value  amounts  presented  herein  have  been  restated  to  reflect  the  retroactive  effect  of
these  stock  splits.

Expansion  of  Operations

United  States

Georgia-Pacific   Railroads:   On   December  31,   2003,   the   Company   completed   the   purchase   from GP of   all   of   the   issued   and
outstanding   shares   of   common   stock   of   the   Chattahoochee   Industrial   Railroad   (CIRR),   the   Arkansas   Louisiana   &   Mississippi
Railroad  Company  (ALM),  and  the  Fordyce  &  Princeton  Railroad  Company  (F&P,  and  collectively,  the  Railroads)  for  approximately
$54.9  million   in   cash.   As   contemplated   with   the   acquisitions,   the   Company   will   implement   a   severance   program   in   the   first
quarter  of  2004  under  which  approximately  13  Railroad  employees  will  be  terminated.  The  aggregate  $1.0 million  additional  cost
of  these  restructuring  activities  was  considered  a  liability  assumed  in  the  acquisition,  and  as  such,  was  allocated  to  the  purchase
price. The   Company   funded   the   acquisition   through   its   revolving   line   of   credit   held   under   its   primary   credit   agreement.
In
connection   with   the   transaction,   GP   agreed   to   indemnify   the   Company   for   certain   losses   suffered   as   a   result   of   breaches   of
certain  representations,  warranties  and  covenants  contained  in  the  sale  agreement.  GP  is  generally  not  required  to  pay  under  the
indemnities   until   claims   against   GP,   on   a   cumulative   basis,   exceed   $500,000.   Upon   exceeding   this   threshold,   GP   is   generally
obligated  to  provide  indemnification  for  losses  in  excess  of  $500,000,  up  to  a  limit  of  $20.0 million  for  general  indemnities.  With
respect  to  GP’s  environmental  indemnities  generally,  GP  is  obligated  to  provide  indemnification  for  80%  of  losses  in  excess  of
$500,000  and  the  Company  is  responsible  for  the  remaining  20%,  up  to  a  total  cap  of  $2.0 million.  In  the  event  environmental
liabilities  exceed  $2.0 million,  GP  is  obligated  to  pay  100%  of  any  such  excess  up  to  a  limit  of  $15.0 million.  The  majority  of  these
general  indemnification  obligations  expire  in  June 2005,  while  the  environmental  liability  indemnity  expires  in  December 2008. In
conjunction  with  the  acquisition,  the  Company  entered  into  two  Transportation  Services  Agreements  which  are  20-year  agree-
ments  for  the  Railroads  to  provide  rail  transportation  service  to  GP.

Oregon  Lease:  On  December 30,  2002,  the  Company  expanded  its  Oregon  region  by  commencing  railroad  operations  over  a  76-
mile   rail   line   between   Salem   and   Eugene,   Oregon   previously   operated   by BNSF.   The   rail   line   is   contiguous   to   the   Company’s
existing   Oregon   railroad   operations   and   the   Company   is   operating   it   under   a   15-year   lease   agreement   with   BNSF.   Under   the
lease,  no  payments  to  the  lessor  are  required  as  long  as  certain  operating  conditions  are  met.  Through  December 31,  2003,  no
payments  were  required  under  this  lease.

1 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Utah  Railway  Company:  On  August 28,  2002,  the  Company  acquired  all  of  the  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  of
Utah   Railway   Company   (URC)  for   approximately   $55.7  million   in   cash,   including   transaction   costs.   As   contemplated   with   the
acquisition,   the   Company   implemented   a   severance   program   under   which   15   URC   employees   were   terminated   in   2002.   The
aggregate  $578,000  cost  of  these  restructuring  activities  was  considered  a  liability  assumed  in  the  acquisition,  and  as  such,  was
allocated  to  the  purchase  price.  The  Company  funded  the  acquisition  through  its  revolving  line  of  credit  held  under  its  primary
credit  agreement.

Emons:  On  February 22,  2002,  the  Company  acquired  Emons  Transportation  Group,  Inc.  (Emons)  for  approximately  $29.4 million
in  cash,  including  transaction  costs  and  net  of  cash  received  in  the  acquisition.  The  Company  purchased  all  of  the  outstanding
shares   of   Emons   at   $2.50   per   share.   As   contemplated   with   the   acquisition,   the   Company   implemented   early   retirement   and
severance   programs   under   which   24   Emons   employees   were   terminated   in   2002.   The   aggregate   $804,000   cost   of   these
restructuring  activities  was  considered  a  liability  assumed  in  the  acquisition  and  as  such,  was  allocated  to  the  purchase  price.
The  majority  of  these  costs  were  paid  in  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2002.  The  Company  funded  the  acquisition  through
its  revolving  line  of  credit  held  under  its  primary  credit  agreement.

South  Buffalo:  On  October 1,  2001,  the  Company  acquired  all  of  the  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  of  South
Buffalo  Railway  (South  Buffalo)  from  Bethlehem  Steel  Corp.  (Bethlehem)  for  $33.1 million  in  cash,  including  transaction  costs  and
the  assumption  of  certain  liabilities  of  $5.6 million. The  purchase  price  was  reduced  by  a  $669,000  adjustment  pursuant  to  the
final  determination  of  the  net  assets  of  South  Buffalo  on  the  sale  date.  This  amount,  together  with  another  $728,000  related  to
pre-acquisition  liabilities  paid  by  the  Company  on  Bethlehem’s  behalf,  was  paid  to  the  Company  in  December  2002.  Although
Bethlehem  filed  for  voluntary  protection  under  U.S.  bankruptcy  laws  on  October 5,  2001,  these  payments  were  funded  from  a
$3.0 million  escrow  account  held  by  an  independent  trustee  to  settle  amounts  due  to  the  Company  pursuant  to  the  South  Buffalo
acquisition. As   contemplated   with   the   acquisition,   the   Company   closed   the   former   South   Buffalo   headquarters   office   in
March 2002  and  implemented  an  early  retirement  program  under  which  26  South  Buffalo  employees  were  terminated  in  Decem-
ber   2001.   The   aggregate   $876,000   cost   of   these   restructuring   activities   was   considered   a   liability   assumed   in   the   acquisition,
and  therefore  was  included  in  purchase  consideration.  The  majority  of  these  costs  were  paid  in  2001.

Australia

On   December  16,   2000,   the   Company,   through   its   50%-owned   subsidiary,   ARG,   completed   the   acquisition   of   Westrail   Freight
from  the  government  of  Western  Australia  for  approximately $334.4 million.  To  complete  the  acquisition,  the  Company  contrib-
uted  its  formerly  wholly-owned  subsidiary,  Australia  Southern  Railroad  (ASR),  to  ARG  along  with  the  Company’s  equity  interest  in
Asia  Pacific  Transport  Consortium  (APTC) and  $21.4 million  of  cash  while  Wesfarmers,  the  other  50%  owner  of  ARG,  contributed
$64.2 million  in  cash,  which included  a  long-term  Australian  dollar  denominated  non-interest  bearing  note  of  $8.2 million  to  match
a   similar   note   due   to   the   Company   from   ASR   at   the   date   of   the   transaction.   ARG   funded   the   remaining   purchase   price   with
proceeds  from  its  Australian  bank  credit  facility.

The  Company  recognized  a  $10.1 million  gain  upon  the  issuance  of  ARG  stock  to  Wesfarmers  as  a  result  of  such  issuance  being
at  a  per  share  price  in  excess  of  the  Company’s  book  value  per  share  investment  in  ASR.  Additionally,  due  to  the  deconsolidation
of   ASR,   the   Company   recognized   a   $6.5  million   deferred   tax   expense   resulting   from   the   financial   reporting   versus   tax   basis
difference  in  the  Company’s  equity  investment  in  ARG.

On  April 20,  2001,  APTC  completed  the  arrangement  of  debt  and  equity  capital  to  build,  own  and  operate  the  Alice  Springs  to
Darwin   railway   line   in   the   Northern   Territory   of   Australia.   As   previously   arranged,   upon   APTC   reaching   financial   closure,   Wes-
farmers  contributed  an  additional  $7.4 million  into  ARG  and  accordingly,  the  Company  recorded  an  additional  gain  of  $3.7  million
related  to  the  December,  2000  issuance  of  ASR  stock  to  Wesfarmers.  A  related  deferred  income  tax  expense  of  $1.1 million  was
also  recorded.  ARG  then  paid  a  total  of  $7.4 million  to  its  two  shareholders,  in  equal  amounts  of  $3.7 million,  as  partial  payment
of  each  shareholder’s  Australian  dollar  denominated  non-interest  bearing  note,  which  resulted  in  a  $508,000  currency  transaction
loss  for  the  Company.  The  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  railway  line  was  completed  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2003.

The   additional   gain   of   $3.7  million   relating   to   the   formation   of   ARG   represented   an   adjustment   to   the   difference   between   the
recorded  balance  of  the  Company’s  previously  wholly-owned  investment  in  Australia,  less  investment  amounts  that  the  Company
estimated   would   be   reimbursed   by   ARG,   and   the   value   of   those   Australian   operations   when   ARG   was   formed.   In   the   fourth
quarter   of   2001,   the   Company,   ARG   and   Wesfarmers   reached   agreement   as   to   the   level   of   acquisition-related   costs   to   be
reimbursed   to   both   50%   owners.   Accordingly,   the   Company   recorded   a   $728,000   decrease   to   its   previously   recorded   gain   to
reflect  the  lower  than  estimated  reimbursed  amount  for  acquisition-related  costs.

The  Company  accounts  for  its  50%  ownership  in  ARG  under  the  equity  method  of  accounting.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year  Ended  December 31,  2003  Compared  to  Year  Ended  December 31,  2002

North  American  Operating  Revenues

Overview

North  American  operating  revenues  (which  exclude  revenues  from  the  Company’s  equity  investments)  were  $244.8 million  in  the
year  ended  December  31,  2003  compared  to  $209.5 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $35.3 million  or
16.6%.   The   $35.3  million   increase   in   operating   revenue   was   attributable   to   a   $25.3  million   increase   in   freight   revenues   and   a

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

1 7

$10.0  million   net   increase   in   non-freight   revenues.   The   $25.3  million   increase   in   freight   revenues   consisted   of   $3.5  million,
$8.7 million  and  $1.4 million  in  freight  revenues  from  new  Oregon,  URC  and  Emons  operations,  respectively,  and  $11.7 million  in
freight   revenues   on   existing   North   American   operations.   The   $10.0  million   net   increase   in   non-freight   revenues   consisted   of
$5.6 million  and  $602,000  in  non-freight  revenue  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  URC  and  Emons,  respectively,  and  $3.8 million
in  non-freight  revenues  on  existing  North  American  operations.  The  following  table  compares  North  American  freight  revenues,
carloads  and  average  freight  revenues  per  carload  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

Freight  Revenues

North  American  Freight  Revenues  and  Carloads  Comparison  by  Commodity  Group
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(dollars  in  thousands,  except  average  per  carload)

Commodity Group

Coal, Coke & Ores

Pulp & Paper

Petroleum Products

Minerals & Stone

Lumber & Forest Products

Metals

Farm & Food Products

Chemicals-Plastics

Autos & Auto Parts

Intermodal

Other

Totals

Freight Revenue

Carloads

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

 2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

Average
Freight
Revenue
Per Carload

2003

2002

2003

$ 37,881

30,939

24,455

22,350

17,093

17,078

12,133

11,067

5,775

1,574

2,222

20.7% $ 28,685
16.9%
25,711

18.2% 167,363
74,662
16.3%

31.2% 136,044
14.1%
64,494

29.6% $226
414
14.0%

13.4%

12.2%

9.4%

9.4%

6.6%

6.1%

3.2%

0.9%

1.2%

20,655

21,236

12,828

13.1%

13.5%

8.2%

15,993

10.2%

10,158

9,523

6,996

1,302

4,202

6.5%

6.1%

4.4%

0.8%

2.7%

31,798

57,841

53,793

58,145

32,589

23,517

14,235

5,518

10,292

6.0%

10.9%

10.2%

11.0%

6.2%

4.5%

2.8%

1.1%

2.0%

29,479

6.4%

50,844

11.0%

36,265

7.9%

57,846

12.6%

27,378

19,949

17,130

5,387

15,527

5.9%

4.3%

3.7%

1.2%

3.4%

769

286

318

294

372

471

406

285

216

$182,567

100.0% $157,289

100.0% 529,753

100.0% 460,343

100.0% 345

$211

399

701

418

354

276

371

477

408

242

271

342

Coal,  Coke  and  Ores  revenues  increased  by  $9.2 million,  or  32.1%,  due  to  an  increase  of  $8.1 million  in  freight  revenues  from  the
acquisition  of  URC  and  an  increase  in  revenues  of  $1.1 million  from  hauling  carloads  of  Coal  on  existing  operations  for  power
generating  facilities.

Pulp  and  Paper  revenues  increased  by  $5.2 million,  or  20.3%,  due  to  an  increase  of  $483,000  in  freight  revenues  from  hauling
carloads  of  Pulp  and  Paper  from  the  new  Oregon  line,  and  an  increase  of  $4.7 million  in  revenue  from  existing  North  American
operations  serving  Pulp  and  Paper  customers  located  in  the  Company’s  Oregon,  New  York-Pennsylvania  and  Canada Regions.

Petroleum  Products  revenues  increased  by  $3.8 million,  or  18.4%,  primarily  due  to  an  increase  of  $2.9 million  in  freight  revenues
in  the  Company’s  Mexico Region  primarily  due  to  longer  hauls  for  an  existing  customer  and a  hurricane  that  temporarily  halted
shipments  in  2002,  and  an  increase  of  $949,000 in  revenues in the  Company’s other  Regions.

Lumber  and  Forest  Products  revenues  increased  by  $4.3 million,  or  33.2%,  due  to  an increase  of  $2.0 million  in  revenues  from  the
new  Oregon  line,  and  an increase  in  freight  revenue of  $2.3 million on  existing  operations in  the  Company’s  Oregon  and  Canada
Regions.

Freight  revenues  from  all  remaining  commodities  reflected  a  net  increase  of  $2.8 million.

Total   North   American   carloads   were   529,753   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003   compared   to   460,343   in   the   year   ended
December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  69,410  or  15.1%.  The  increase  of  69,410,  consisted  of  19,790,  29,329  and  3,504  carloads,
from  new  Oregon,  URC  and  Emons  operations,  respectively,  and  a  net  increase  of  16,787  carloads  on  existing  operations.

The  overall  average  revenue  per  carload  increased  to  $345  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  $342  per  carload
in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002.

Non-Freight  Revenues

North  American  non-freight  revenues  were  $62.3 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  $52.3 million  in  the
year  ended  December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $10.0 million,  or  19.2%.  The  $10.0 million  increase  consisted  of  $5.6 million  and
$602,000  in  non-freight  revenue  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  URC  and  Emons,  respectively,  and  $3.8 million  in  non-freight

1 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

revenues  on  existing  North  American  operations.  The  following  table  compares  North  American  non-freight  revenues  for  the  years
ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

North  American
Non-Freight  Revenues  Comparison
Years  Ended  December  31,  2003  and  2002
(dollars  in  thousands)

Railcar switching

Car hire and rental income

Car repair services

Other operating income

Total non-freight revenues

2003

$33,371

7,054

4,447

17,388

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

35.8% $28,426
20.2%
7,503

9.6%

34.4%

3,563

12,759

54.4%

14.4%

6.8%

24.4%

$62,260

100.0% $52,251

100.0%

The  increase  of  $4.9 million  in  railcar  switching  revenues  is  primarily  attributable  to  the  addition  of  URC  railroad  operations.

The   net   increase   of   $4.6  million   in   other   operating   income   is   primarily   attributable   to   an   increase   of   $3.9  million   on   existing
operations   and   $403,000   and   $321,000   from   a   full   year   of   operations   of   URC   and   Emons,   respectively.   The   increase   of
$3.9 million  on  existing operations  relates  primarily  to  increases  of  $810,000  in  trackage  rights  and  haulage  revenues,  $740,000
in  demurrage  and  storage,  $423,000  in  management  fees  and  approximately  $1.9 million  in  other  operating  income  including  a
major  one-time  shipment  for  the  U.S.  government.

North  American  Operating  Expenses

Overview

North  American  operating  expenses were  $208.5 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  $177.5 million  in  the
year  ended  December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $31.0 million,  or  17.5%.  The  increase  was  attributable  to  an  $18.2 million  increase
on   existing   North   American operations,   including   additional   costs   from   the   new   contiguous   rail   line   in   the   Company’s   Oregon
Region,  and  $11.0 million  and  $1.8 million  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  URC  and  Emons,  respectively.

Operating  Ratios

The   Company’s   operating   ratio   increased   to   85.2%   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003   from   84.7%   in   the   year   ended
December 31,  2002.  The  year  ended  December 31,  2002  includes  a  favorable  1.5%  impact  from  net  gains  on  sale  of  assets.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

1 9

North  American  Operating  Expenses

The  following  table  sets  forth  a  comparison  of  the  Company’s  North  American  operating  expenses  in  the  years  ended  Decem-
ber 31,  2003  and  2002:

North  American
Operating  Expense  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(dollars  in  thousands)

Labor and benefits

Equipment rents

Purchased services

Depreciation and amortization

Diesel fuel

Casualties and insurance

Materials

Net gain on sale and impairment of assets

Other expenses

Total operating expenses

2003

2002

Percent of
Operating
Revenues

Dollars

Percent of
Operating
Revenues

Dollars

$ 87,315

35.7%

$ 77,778

37.1%

18,409

17,766

15,471

18,325

13,831

15,189

(87)

22,303

7.5%

7.3%

6.3%

7.5%

5.6%

6.2%

0.0%

9.1%

17,776

15,471

13,569

13,368

10,592

13,047

(3,140)

19,072

8.5%

7.4%

6.5%

6.4%

5.1%

6.2%

(1.5%)

9.0%

$208,522

85.2%

$177,533

84.7%

Labor  and  benefits  expense  increased  $9.5 million,  or  12.3%,  of  which  $4.1  million  was  an  increase  on  existing  North  American
operations  and  $4.7  million  and  $700,000  was  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  URC  and  Emons,  respectively.  The  $4.1 million
increase   on   existing   operations   was   primarily   attributable   to   approximately   $1.4  million   from   the   new   rail   line   in the Oregon
Region, $400,000  from  hires  in  new  legal,  tax  and  safety  management  positions  and $2.3 million  from  regular  wage  increases  and
increased   labor expense related   to   higher   shipment   levels   on   existing   operations.   As   a   percentage   of   total   revenue,   labor   and
benefits  decreased  by  1.4%  to  35.7%  in  2003  from  37.1%  in  2002.

Diesel   fuel   expense   increased   $4.9  million,   or   37.1%,   of   which   $3.4   million   was   an   increase   on   existing   North   American
operations  and  $1.3  million  and  $180,000  was  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  URC  and  Emons,  respectively.  The  $3.4 million
increase  on  existing  operations  was  primarily  attributable  to  increased  fuel  prices  in  2003  as  the  average  price  per  gallon  of  fuel
increased  20.5%.  As  a  percentage  of  total  revenue,  diesel  fuel  increased  to  7.5%  in  2003  from  6.4%  in  2002.

Casualties   and   insurance   increased   $3.2  million,   or   30.6%,   of   which   $2.8   million   was   an   increase   on   existing   North   American
operations   and   $350,000   and   $67,000   was   from   a   full   year   of   operations   of   URC   and   Emons,   respectively.   The   $2.8  million
increase  on  existing  operations  was  primarily  attributable  to  an  increase  in  derailment  expense  of  $1.6 million,  insurance  expense
of  $1.0 million,  and  claims  expense  of  $170,000.  As  a  percentage  of  total  revenue,  casualties  and  insurance  increased  to  5.6%  in
2003  from  5.1%  in  2002.

Net  gain  on  sale  and  impairment  of  assets  decreased  $3.1 million  primarily  due  to  a  non-recurring  gain  of  $2.8 million  from  an
asset  sale in  the  Company’s  New  York-Pennsylvania Region  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002.

Other  expenses  increased  $3.2 million,  or  16.9%,  of  which  $2.1 million  was  an  increase  on  existing  North  American operations
and  $1.0 million  and  $107,000  was  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  URC  and  Emons,  respectively.  The  $2.1 million  increase  on
existing  operations  was  primarily  due  to  increases  of  $350,000  in  accounting  and  legal  fees,  $295,000  in  information  technology
costs,   $231,000   in   trackage   rights,   $133,000   in   acquisition   costs,   and   approximately   $1.1  million   in   all   other   costs.   As   a
percentage  of  total  revenue,  other  expenses  increased  to  9.1%  in  2003  from  9.0%  in  2002.

Interest  Expense

Interest   expense   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003,   was   $8.6  million   compared   to   $8.1  million   in   the   year   ended   Decem-
ber  31,   2002,   an   increase   of   $507,000,   or   6.2%   primarily   due   to   higher   average   outstanding   debt   resulting   from   the   URC
acquisition.   It   should   be   noted   that   interest   expense   for   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002   includes   a   $597,000   non-cash
charge  for  the  write  off  of  unamortized  deferred  finance  fees  as  a  result  of  a  refinancing  in  2002  (See  Note  9  to  Consolidated
Financial  Statements).

Other  Income,  Net

Other  income,  net,  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  was  $986,000  compared  to  $726,000  in  the  year  ended  December 31,
2002,  an  increase  of  $260,000,  or  35.8%.  Other  income,  net,  in  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002  consists  primarily
of  interest  income  and  currency  gains  and  losses  on  Australian  dollar  denominated  cash  and  receivable  balances.

2 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Income  Taxes

The  Company’s  effective  income  tax  rate  in  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002  was  36.9%  and  35.6%,  respectively.
The  increase  in  2003  is  partially  attributable  to  a  higher  effective  rate  on  foreign  earnings  partially  offset  by  a  decrease  in  state
effective  tax  rates.

Equity  in  Net  Income  of  Unconsolidated  International  Affiliates

Equity  earnings  of  unconsolidated  international  affiliates  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003  were  $10.6 million  compared  to
$9.8 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $867,000.  Equity  earnings  in  the  year  ended  December 31,
2003,   consist   of   $10.4  million   from ARG   and   $270,000   from   South   American   affiliates.   Equity   earnings   in   the   year   ended
December 31,  2002,  consist  of  $8.5 million  from ARG  and  $1.3 million  from  South  American  affiliates.

Net  Income  and  Earnings  Per  Share

The  Company’s  net  income  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  was  $28.7  million  compared  to  net  income  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2002,  of  $25.6  million,  an  increase  of  $3.1 million,  or  12.2%.  The  increase  in  net  income  is  the  result  of  an  increase
from  North  American  operations  of  $2.2  million  and  an  increase  in  equity  earnings  of  unconsolidated  affiliates  of  $867,000.

Basic  and  Diluted  Earnings  Per  Share  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  were  $1.21  and  $1.07,  respectively,  on  weighted
average  shares  of  22.7 million  and  26.8 million,  respectively,  compared  to  $1.11  and  $0.97,  respectively,  on  weighted  average
shares   of   22.1  million   and   26.4  million   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002.   The   earnings   per   share   and   weighted   average
shares   outstanding   for   the   years   ended   December  31,   2003   and   2002   are   adjusted   for   the   impact   of   the   February  27,   2004,
February 28,  2002  and  May 31,  2001  stock  splits  (see  Note  2  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements).

Supplemental  Information — Australian  Railroad  Group

ARG   is   50%   owned   by   the   Company   and   50%   owned   by   Wesfarmers   Limited,   a   public   corporation   based   in   Perth,   Western
Australia.   The   Company   accounts   for   its   50%   ownership   in   ARG   under   the   equity   method   of   accounting.   As   a   result   of   the
strengthening  of  the  Australian  dollar  in  2003,  the  average  currency  translation  rate  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003  was
21.5%   more   favorable   than   the   rate   for   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002,   the   impact   of   which   should   be   considered   in   the
following  discussions  of  equity  earnings,  freight  and  non-freight  operating  revenues,  and  operating  expenses.

In  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002,  the  Company  recorded  $10.4  million  and  $8.5 million,  respectively,  of  equity
earnings  from  ARG,  which  is  reported  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  statements  of  income  under  the  caption  Equity  in  Net
Income  of  International  Affiliates — Australia.  The  following  table  provides  ARG’s  freight  revenues,  carloads  and  average  freight
revenues  per  carload  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002.

Freight  Revenues

Australian  Railroad  Group  Freight  Revenues  and  Carloads  by  Commodity  Group
Years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands,  except  average  per  carload)

Commodity Group

Freight Revenues

Carloads

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

Average
Freight
Revenue
Per Carload

2003

2002

Grain

$ 61,125

29.5% $ 53,590

30.5% 158,462

18.7% 177,651

20.5% $386

$302

Other Ores and Minerals

Iron Ore

Alumina

Bauxite

Hook and Pull(Haulage)

Gypsum

Other

Total

48,782

36,238

16,459

11,363

5,498

2,915

23.6%

17.5%

8.0%

5.5%

2.7%

1.4%

38,075

27,038

13,828

10,125

8,343

2,327

21.7% 107,257

12.7% 99,816

11.5% 455

15.4% 179,711

21.2% 177,619

20.5% 202

7.9% 153,685

18.1% 151,756

17.5% 107

5.8% 126,865

15.0% 127,892

14.8%

90

4.8% 13,337

1.6% 24,628

2.9% 412

1.3% 45,548

5.4% 42,389

4.9%

64

24,543

11.8%

22,114

12.6% 62,865

7.3% 63,724

7.4% 390

$206,923

100.0% $175,440

100.0% 847,730

100.0% 865,475

100.0% 244

381

152

91

79

339

55

347

203

ARG’s  freight  revenues  were  $206.9 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  $175.4 million  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $31.5 million  or  17.9%.  In  local  currency,  freight  revenues  decreased  2.9%  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2003,  compared  to  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

2 1

Total  ARG  carloads  were  847,730  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003  compared  to  865,475  in  the  year  ended  December 31,
2002,  a  net  decrease  of  17,745  carloads  or  2.1%.  The  net  decrease  of  17,745  carloads  resulted  primarily  from  decreases  in  grain
of   19,189   carloads   due   to   a   drought   and   hook   and   pull   (haulage   traffic)   of   11,291   carloads   due   to   the   loss   of   a   customer   in
April  2002,   offset   by   a   net   increase   of   12,735   carloads   in   all   other   commodities   combined.   The   average   revenue   per   carload
increased  to  $244  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  $203  per  carload  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,
an  increase  of  20.2%,  due  to  the  strength  of  the  Australian  dollar  relative  to  the  U.S.  dollar  in  2003  versus  2002.

Non-Freight  Revenues

ARG’s  non-freight  revenues  were  $42.6 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003  compared  to  $35.6 million  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $7.0 million  or  19.7%.  In  local  currency,  non-freight  revenues  decreased  1.4%  in  the  year
ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002.

The  following  table  compares  ARG’s  non-freight  revenues  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

Australian  Railroad  Group
Non-Freight  Revenues  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands)

Third party track access fees

Alice Springs to Darwin Line

Fuel sales

Other operating income

Total non-freight revenues

2003

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

$18,042

42.3% $13,744

38.6%

12,103

28.4%

13,421

37.7%

8,083

4,420

19.0%

10.3%

4,636

3,826

13.0%

10.7%

$42,648

100.0% $35,627

100.0%

Construction  of  the  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  rail  line  was  completed  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2003.  ARG’s  role  in  the  project  will
continue  as  a  contracted  operator  and  lessor  of  rail  equipment.

ARG  Operating  Expenses

ARG’s  operating  expenses  were  $194.4 million  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2003,  compared  to  $164.6 million  in  the  year
ended  December 31,  2002,  an  increase  of  $29.8 million  or  18.1%.  The  following  table  sets  forth  a  comparison  of ARG’s  operating
expenses  in  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

Australian  Railroad  Group
Operating  Expense  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands)

Labor and benefits

Equipment rents

Purchased services

Depreciation and amortization

Diesel fuel

Casualties and insurance

Materials

Net gain on sale and impairment of assets

Other expenses

Total operating expenses

2 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

2003

2002

% of
Operating
Revenue

$

% of
Operating
Revenue

$

$ 47,337

19.0% $ 39,320

1,733

60,096

23,443

22,656

8,568

11,635

(2,081)

20,969

0.7%

24.1%

9.4%

9.1%

3.4%

4.6%

(0.8%)

8.4%

1,118

49,386

17,191

17,530

10,541

7,530

(314)

22,294

18.6%

0.5%

23.4%

8.1%

8.3%

5.0%

3.6%

(0.1%)

10.6%

$194,356

77.9% $164,596

78.0%

Labor  and  benefits  as  a  percentage  of  revenue  were  19.0%  in  the  year  ended  December 21,  2003  compared  to  18.6%  in  the  year
ended  December 31,  2002.  An  increase  in  labor  expense  resulting  from  the  hiring  of  additional  locomotive  drivers  in  anticipation
of  increased  grain  shipments  due  to  the  strong  grain  harvest  in  Western  Australia  and  for  a  new  customer  contract  in  New  South
Wales,  as  well  as  an  increase  in  labor  expense  for  safety  and  performance  related  bonuses,  were  offset  by  a  decrease  in  labor
costs  following  a  workforce  restructuring  in  2002.  In  local  currency,  labor  and  benefits  expense  declined  0.9%.

Purchased   services,   primarily   for   track   and   locomotive   maintenance   contractors,   were   24.1%   of   revenue   in   the   year   ended
December 21,  2003  compared  to  23.4%  of  revenue  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002.  In  local  currency,  purchased  services
expense  increased  0.2%.

Depreciation   and   amortization   expense   as   a   percentage   of   revenue   increased   to   9.4%   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003,
compared   to   8.1%   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002.   The   higher   depreciation   expense   resulted   from   an   increase   in
depreciable  assets  due  to  track  capital  expenditures.  In  local  currency,  depreciation  and  amortization  expense  increased  12.3%.

Diesel  fuel  expense  as  a  percentage  of  revenue  increased  to  9.1%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  8.3%  in
the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  primarily  due  to  an  increase  in  fuel  sales  to  third  parties  and  an  increase  in  fuel  prices.  In
local  currency,  diesel  fuel  expense  increased  6.4%.

Casualties  and  insurance  as  a  percentage  of  revenue  decreased  to  3.4%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to
5.0%   in   the   year   ended   December   31,   2002,   due   to   improved   safety   performance   and   fewer   derailments.   In   local   currency,
casualties  and  insurance  expense  declined  33.1%.

Materials  expense  as  a  percentage  of  revenue  increased  to  4.6%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  3.6%  in  the
year   ended   December  31,   2002,   due   to   increases   in   track   and   rolling   stock   repairs.   In   local   currency,   materials   expense
increased  27.2%.

Net  gain  on  sale  and  impairment  of  assets  increased  to  0.8%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003,  compared  to  0.1%  in  the
year  ended  December 31,  2002,  due  to  the  sale  of  real  estate  and  railcars.

Other   expenses   decreased   to   8.4%   of   revenue   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003,   compared   to   10.6%   in   the   year   ended
December  31,   2002.   The   decrease   in   2003   was   primarily   the   result   of   lower   track   access   fees   in   South   Australia,   lower   grain
transfer  costs  due  to  the  drought,  lower  general  and  administrative  costs,  as  well  as  the  non-recurrence  of  $867,000  in  costs
related  to  the  unsuccessful  bid  for  the  privatization  of  an  Australian  railroad  in  2002.  In  local  currency,  other  expenses  decreased
22.6%.

Income  Taxes

ARG’s   effective   income   tax   rate   in   the   years   ended   December  31,   2003   and   2002   was   15.7%   and   24.6%,   respectively.   The
decrease  in  2003  was  attributable  to  finalizing  the  tax  base  of  assets  acquired  from  the  government  in  December  2000.  The  net
assets   acquired   were   from   a   government   tax   exempt   entity,   and   the   determination   of   the   tax   base   involved   the   application   of
complex  legislation.  During  2003,  all  matters  were  favorably  resolved  with  the  Australian  Taxation  Office,  resulting  in a  reduction
in  income  tax  expense due  to  an  overprovision  of  tax expense in  prior  periods.

Year  Ended  December 31,  2002  Compared  to  Year  Ended  December 31,  2001

North  American  Operating  Revenues

Overview

North   American   operating   revenues   (which   exclude   revenues   from   the   Company’s   equity   investees)   were   $209.5  million   in   the
year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  $173.6 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001,  a  net  increase  of  $35.9 mil-
lion   or   20.7%.   The   increase   in   operating   revenue   was   attributable   to   a   $27.4  million   net   increase   in   freight   revenues   and   an
$8.5 million  net  increase  in  non-freight  revenues.  The  $27.4 million  net  increase  in  freight  revenues  consisted  of  $10.2 million  in
freight  revenue  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  South  Buffalo,  $15.2 million  in  freight  revenues  from  Emons,  and  $4.1 million  in
freight  revenues  from  URC,  offset  by  a  $2.1 million  decrease  on  existing  North  American  operations.  The  $8.5 million  net  increase
in  non-freight  revenues  consisted  of  $2.0 million  in  non-freight  revenue  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  South  Buffalo,  $5.4 million
in  non-freight  revenues  from  Emons,  $2.7 million  in  non-freight  revenues  from  URC,  and  $3.1 million  due  primarily  to  the  addition
of   several   new   industrial   switching   contracts,   offset   by   a   $4.7  million   decrease   on   existing   North   American   operations.   The

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

2 3

following  table  compares  North  American  freight  revenues,  carloads  and  average  freight  revenues  per  carload  for  the  years  ended
December 31,  2002  and  2001:

Freight  Revenues

North  American  Freight  Revenues  and  Carloads  Comparison  by  Commodity  Group
Years  Ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001
(dollars  in  thousands,  except  average  per  carload)

Commodity Group

Coal, Coke & Ores

Pulp & Paper

Minerals & Stone

Petroleum Products

Metals

Lumber & Forest Products

Farm & Food Products

Chemicals-Plastics

Autos & Auto Parts

Intermodal

Other

Totals

Freight Revenues

Carloads

2002

% of
Total

2001

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

2001

% of
Total

Average
Freight
Revenue
Per Carload

2002

2001

$ 28,685

18.2% $ 28,081

21.6% 136,044

29.6% 128,286

33.1% $211

$219

25,711

21,236

20,655

15,993

12,828

10,158

9,523

6,996

1,302

4,202

16.3%

13.5%

13.1%

10.2%

8.2%

6.5%

6.1%

4.4%

0.8%

2.7%

18,663

19,439

16,971

11,239

8,846

10,008

8,359

2,499

622

5,134

14.4% 64,494

14.0% 49,033

12.6% 399

15.0% 50,844

11.0% 43,615

11.2% 418

13.1% 29,479

6.4% 27,541

7.1% 701

8.7% 57,846

12.6% 40,679

10.5% 276

6.8% 36,265

7.9% 26,727

6.9% 354

7.7% 27,378

5.9% 28,205

7.3% 371

6.4% 19,949

4.3% 16,574

4.3% 477

1.9% 17,130

0.5%

5,387

3.7%

1.2%

5,283

1,954

1.4% 408

0.5% 242

3.9% 15,527

3.4% 20,086

5.1% 271

381

446

616

276

331

355

504

473

318

256

$157,289

100.0% $129,861

100.0% 460,343

100.0% 387,983

100.0% 342

335

Coal,   Coke   and   Ores   revenues   increased   by   a   net   $604,000   or   2.2%,   primarily   due   to   an   increase   of   $3.8  million   in   freight
revenues  from  hauling  new  carloads  of coal  from  the  acquisition  of  URC,  offset  by  a  decrease  in  revenues  of  $3.2 million  from
hauling  carloads  of coal  on  existing  operations  for  customers  operating  in  the  electric  utility  industry.

Pulp  and  Paper  revenues  increased  by  $7.0 million,  or  37.8%,  primarily  due  to  an  increase  of  $5.3 million  in  freight  revenues  from
the  acquisition  of  Emons  and  an  increase  of  $1.7 million  in  revenue  from  existing  North  American  operations  serving pulp  and
paper  industries  located in  the  Company’s  Oregon,  New  York-Pennsylvania  and  Canada Regions.

Minerals   and   Stone   revenues   increased   by   $1.8  million,   or   9.2%,   primarily   due   to   $1.3  million   in   freight   revenues   from   the
acquisition   of   Emons   and   a   net   increase   of   $500,000   in   revenue   from   existing   North   American   operations.   The   $500,000   net
increase   from   existing   North   American   operations   primarily   consisted   of   a   $2.0  million   increase   on   existing   US   and   Canada
operations   of   which   $1.7  million   was   from   hauling   additional   carloads   of salt   as   the   result   of   a   new   salt   mine   customer   which
began  shipping  in  May 2001,  offset  by  a  $1.5 million  decrease in  the  Mexico Region,  primarily  cement,  due  to  the  downturn  in  the
Mexican  economy  and  the  impact  of  Hurricane  Isidore.

Petroleum   Products   revenues   increased   by   $3.7  million,   or   21.7%,   primarily   due   to   $1.0  million   in   freight   revenues   from   the
acquisition   of   Emons,   an   increase   of   $2.2  million   in   freight   revenues in   the   Company’s   Mexico Region,   primarily   due   to   a   new
contract  and  shifting  traffic  patterns,  and  an  increase  of  $424,000 in  the  Company’s  other  Regions.

Metals   revenues   increased   by   a   net   $4.8  million,   or   42.3%,   primarily   due   to   $4.8  million   in   freight   revenue   from   a   full   year   of
operations  of  South  Buffalo.

Lumber  and  Forest  Products  revenues  increased  by  $4.0 million,  or  45.0%,  primarily  due  to  $2.0 million  in  freight  revenues  from
the   acquisition   of   Emons,   $634,000   in   freight   revenue   from   a   full   year   of   operations   of   South   Buffalo,   and   an   increase   of
$1.3 million  in  freight  revenue  on  existing  operations,  primarily  the  Company’s  Oregon  and  New  York-Pennsylvania Regions.

Chemicals  and  Plastics  revenues  increased  by  a  net  $1.2 million,  or  13.9%,  primarily  due  to  $1.6 million  in  freight  revenues  from
the  acquisition  of  Emons,  offset  by  a  decrease  of  $442,000  in  freight  revenue  on  existing  operations.

Auto  and  Auto  Parts  revenues  increased  by  $4.5 million,  or  180.0%,  primarily  due  to  $3.9 million  in  freight  revenue  from  a  full  year
of  operations  of  South  Buffalo  and  an  increase  of  $567,000  in  freight  revenue  on  existing  operations.

Freight  revenues  from  all  remaining  commodities  reflected  a  net  decrease  of  $102,000  of  which  $1.1 million  was  a  net  decrease
on  existing  operations,  offset  by  $1.0 million  in  freight  revenues  from  the  acquisitions  of  Emons  and  URC.

Total   North   American   carloads   were   460,343   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002   compared   to   387,983   in   the   year   ended
December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  72,360  or  18.7%.  The  increase  of  72,360,  consisted  of  36,884  carloads  from  a  full  year  of

2 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

operations  of  South  Buffalo,  36,190  carloads  from  the  acquisition  of  Emons,  17,385  from  the  acquisition  of  URC,  offset  by  a  net
decrease  of  18,099  carloads  on  existing  operations  of  which  15,632  carloads  were coal.

The  overall  average  revenue  per  carload  increased  to  $342  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  $335  per  carload
in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  2.1%,  due  primarily  to  higher  average  revenues  per  carload  on  the  carloads
from   the   acquisition   of   Emons,   and   higher   average   revenue   per   carload   on   long-haul petroleum products   in the   Company’s
Mexico Region resulting  from  a  new  contract.

Non-Freight  Revenues

North  American  non-freight  revenues  were  $52.3 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  $43.7 million  in  the
year   ended   December  31,   2001,   a   net   increase   of   $8.5  million,   or   19.5%.   The   following   table   compares   North   American   non-
freight  revenues  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001:

North  American
Non-Freight  Revenues  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001
(dollars  in  thousands)

Railcar switching

Car hire and rental income

Car repair services

Other operating income

Total non-freight revenues

2002

% of
Total

2001

$28,426

54.4% $20,916

7,503

3,563

14.4%

6.8%

7,484

3,135

% of
Total

47.8%

17.1%

7.2%

12,759

24.4%

12,180

27.9%

$52,251

100.0% $43,715

100.0%

The   net   increase   of   $7.5  million   in   railcar   switching   revenues   is   primarily   attributable   to   an   increase   of   $3.1  million   due   to   the
addition  of  several  new  industrial  switching  contracts,  $1.3 million  in  switching  revenues  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  So uth
Buffalo,  $743,000  in  switching  revenues  from  Emons,  $2.3 million  in  switching  revenues  from  URC,  and  a  $89,000  increase  on
existing  North  American  operations.

The   net   increase   of   $579,000   in   other   operating   income   is   primarily   attributable   to   $422,000   from   a   full   year   of   operations   of
South  Buffalo,  $2.8  million  in  revenues  from  Emons  and  $278,000  in  revenues  from  URC,  offset  by  a  decrease  of  $2.9 million  on
existing  operations.  The  decrease  of  $2.9 million  on  existing  operations  relates  primarily  to  a  decrease  of  $1.7 million  in  trackage
rights  and  haulage  revenues in  the  Company’s  New  York-Pennsylvania  and  Mexico Regions,  a  decrease  of  $781,000  in  demur-
rage  and  storage in  the  Company’s  Mexico  and  Canada Regions,  and  a  decrease  of  $398,000  in  revenues  from  the  Company’s
start-up  logistics  operation,  Speedlink,  for  which  operations  ceased  in  September 2001.

North  American  Operating  Expenses

Overview

North  American  operating  expenses  were  $177.5 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  $150.6 million  in  the
year  ended  December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  $26.9 million,  or  17.9%.  The  increase  was  attributable  to  a  $6.3 million  increase  in
North  American  operating  expense  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  South  Buffalo,  a  $17.4  million  increase  from  the  acquisition  of
Emons,  a  $5.9 million  increase  from  the  acquisition  of  URC,  and  a  $2.9 million  increase  in  expenses  due  primarily  to  the  addition
of   several   new   industrial   switching   contracts,   offset   by   a   $5.6   million   decrease   on   existing   North   American   operations.   The
$5.6 million  decrease  in  existing  North  American  operating  expenses  was  attributable  to  an  increase  in  net  gain  on  sale  of  assets
of   $2.3  million,   a   $1.0  million   decrease   in   existing   North   American operating   expenses   resulting   from   cost   reduction   programs
implemented  to  offset  decreased  revenues  on  certain  of  the  Company’s  existing  North  American  operations,  and  a  $2.3 million
decrease   resulting   from   the   termination   of   the   Company’s   logistics   operation,   Speedlink,   which   ceased   operations   in
September 2001.

Operating  Ratios

The  Company’s  consolidated  operating  ratio  improved  to  84.7%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002  from  86.8%  in  the  year
ended   December  31,   2001.   The   year   ended   December  31,   2002   includes   a   1.5%   reduction   related   to   net   gains   on   sale   and
impairment  of  assets.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

2 5

The  following  table  sets  forth  a  comparison  of  the  Company’s  North  American  operating  expenses  in  the  years  ended  Decem-
ber 31,  2002  and  2001:

North  American
Operating  Expense  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001
(dollars  in  thousands)

Labor and benefits

Equipment rents

Purchased services

Depreciation and amortization

Diesel fuel

Casualties and insurance

Materials

Net gain on sale and impairment of assets

Other expenses

Total operating expenses

2002

2001

% of
Operating
Revenue

$

% of
Operating
Revenue

$

$ 77,778

37.1% $ 63,963

17,776

15,471

13,569

13,368

10,592

13,047

(3,140)

19,072

8.5%

7.4%

6.5%

6.4%

5.1%

6.2%

(1.5%)

9.0%

18,477

12,334

12,756

12,060

7,073

11,262

(814)

13,511

36.8%

10.6%

7.1%

7.3%

6.9%

4.1%

6.4%

(0.1%)

7.7%

$177,533

84.7% $150,622

86.8%

Labor   and   benefits   expense   increased   $13.8  million,   or   21.6%,   of   which   $3.0  million   was   an   increase   from   a   full   year   of
operations  of  South  Buffalo,  $7.2 million  was  an  increase  from  Emons,  $2.3 million  was  an  increase  from  URC,  $1.2 million  was
primarily   due   to   costs   associated   with   new   industrial   switching   contracts,   and   $165,000   was   an   increase   on   existing   North
American  operations.

Equipment  rents  expense  decreased  a  net  $701,000,  or  4.0%,  of  which  $345,000  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of  operations
of   South   Buffalo,   $2.1   million   was   an   increase   from   Emons   and   $526,000   was   an   increase   from   URC,   offset   by   a   $2.1  million
decrease  on  existing  North  American  operations  of  which  $1.9 million  was  primarily  car  hire  and  equipment  rents  and  $330,000
was  from  the  termination  of  the  Company’s  logistics  operation,  Speedlink,  which  ceased  operations  in  September 2001.

Purchased  services  increased  $3.1 million,  or  25.4%,  of  which  $319,000  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  South
Buffalo,   $1.9  million   was   an   increase   from   Emons,   $553,000   was   an   increase   from   URC   and   $329,000   was   an   increase   on
existing  North  American  operations.

Depreciation  and  amortization  expense  increased  a  net  $813,000,  or  6.4%,  of  which  $458,000  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of
operations   of   South   Buffalo,   $1.0  million   was   an   increase   from   Emons,   and   $222,000   was   an   increase   from   URC,   offset   by   a
$867,000  decrease  on  existing  North  American  operations  primarily  due  to  discontinued  amortization  of  the  Service  Assurance
Agreement  and  goodwill.  Pursuant  to  adopting  SFAS  No. 142  on  January 1,  2002,  the  Service  Assurance  Agreement  and  goodwill
were  no  longer  being  amortized  (see  Note  6  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements).

Diesel  fuel  expense  increased  a  net  $1.3 million,  or  10.8%,  of  which  $193,000  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of
South   Buffalo,   $1.3   million   was   an   increase   from   Emons,   and   $742,000   was   an   increase   from   URC,   offset   by   a   $927,000
decrease  on  existing  North  American  operations  resulting  primarily  from  decreased  fuel  prices  and  consumption  in  2002.

Casualties  and  insurance  increased  $3.5 million,  or  49.8%,  of  which  $372,000  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of
South  Buffalo,  $693,000  was  an  increase  from  Emons,  $134,000  was  an  increase  from  URC  and  $2.3  million  was  an  increase  on
existing   North   American   operations.   The   $2.3  million   increase   was   primarily   due   to   an   increase   of   $1.2  million   in   liability   and
property  insurance  premiums  since  August 2002,  and  to  an  increase  of  $1.1 million  in  claims  expense.  The  claims  cost  in  2002  is
associated  in  part  with  a  fatality  while  the  2001  results  include  a  credit  of  $188,000  from  the  settlement  of  a  claim  for  less  than
the  amount  reserved.

Materials  expense  increased  a  net  $1.8 million,  or  15.8%,  of  which  $495,000  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of
South  Buffalo,  $1.6  million  was  an  increase  from  Emons,  $185,000  was  an  increase  from  URC,  offset  by  a  $495,000  decrease  on
existing  North  American  operations.

Net  gain  on  sale  and  impairment  of  assets  increased  $2.3 million  due  primarily  to  a  gain  of  $2.8 million  from  an  asset  sale  on  the
Company’s  New  York-Pennsylvania Regions.

Other  expenses  increased  $5.6 million,  or  41.1%,  of  which  $1.1 million  was  an  increase  from  a  full  year  of  operations  of  South
Buffalo,  $754,000  was  an  increase  from  Emons,  $598,000  was  an  increase  from  URC,  $581,000  were  costs  associated  with  new
switching   contracts,   and   $2.5  million   was   an   increase   on   existing   North   American   operations   primarily   due   to   increases   in
acquisition  fees,  accounting  and  legal  fees,  trackage  rights,  and  information  technology  costs.

2 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Interest  Expense

Interest  expense  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  was  $8.1 million  compared  to  $10.0 million  in  the  year  ended  Decem-
ber 31,  2001,  a  decrease  of  $1.9 million,  or  19.0%,  primarily  due  to  a  decrease  in  average  outstanding  debt  and  lower  interest
rates  in  2002,  offset  by  new  borrowings  to  acquire  Emons  and  URC.  Interest  expense  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002
includes  a  $597,000  non-cash  charge  for  the  write  off  of  unamortized  deferred  finance  fees  as  a  result  of  a  refinancing  in  2002
(See  Note  9  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements).

Gain  on  50%  Sale  of  Australia  Southern  Railroad

The  Company  recorded  a  non-cash  gain  of  $3.0 million  in  2001  related  to  its  original  non-cash  gain  of  $10.1 million  recognized  in
December 2000  upon  the  issuance  of  shares  of  ASR  at  a  price  per  share  in  excess  of  its  book  value  per  share  investment  in  ASR
(see  Note  3  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements).

Other  Income,  Net

Other  income,  net,  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  was  $726,000  compared  to  $497,000  in  the  year  ended  December 31,
2001,  an  increase  of  $229,000,  or  46.1%.  Other  income,  net,  in  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001  consists  primarily
of  interest  income  and  currency  gains  and  losses  on  Australian  dollar  denominated  cash  and  receivable  balances.

Income  Taxes

The  Company’s  effective  income  tax  rate  in  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001  was  35.6%  and  37.6%,  respectively.
The   decrease   in   2002   is   partially   attributable   to   lower   tax   rates   on   foreign   operations   offset   by   an   increase   in   the   Company’s
effective  state  tax  rate.

Equity  in  Net  Income  of  Unconsolidated  International  Affiliates

Equity  earnings  of  unconsolidated  international  affiliates  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  were  $9.8 million  compared  to
$8.9 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  $911,000.  Equity  earnings  in  the  year  ended  December 31,
2002,   consist   of   $8.5  million   from ARG   and   $1.3  million   from   South   America   affiliates.   Equity   earnings   in   the   year   ended
December 31,  2001,  consist  of  $8.5 million  from ARG  and  $412,000  from  South  America  affiliates.

Net  Income  and  Earnings  Per  Share

The  Company’s  net  income  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  was  $25.6  million  compared  to  net  income  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2001,  of  $19.1  million,  an  increase  of  $6.5 million,  or  34.2%.  The  increase  in  net  income  is  the  result  of  an  increase
from  North  American  operations  of  $5.6  million  and  an  increase  in  equity  earnings  of  unconsolidated  affiliates  of  $911,000.

Basic  and  Diluted  Earnings  Per  Share  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  were  $1.11  and  $0.97,  respectively,  on  weighted
average  shares  of  22.1 million  and  26.4 million,  respectively,  compared  to  $1.15  and  $0.98,  respectively,  on  weighted  average
shares   of   15.8  million   and   19.4  million   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2001.   The   earnings   per   share   and   weighted   average
shares  outstanding  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001  are  adjusted  for  the  impact  of  stock  splits  (see  Notes  2  and
22  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements).  The  increase  in  weighted  average  shares  outstanding  for  Basic  Earnings  Per  Share  of
6.3 million  is  primarily  attributable  to  the  impact  of  the  December 21,  2001  offering  of  common  stock  (see  Note  11  to  Consoli-
dated   Financial   Statements),   and   the   exercise   of   employee   stock   options   in   2002.   The   increase   in   weighted   average   shares
outstanding  for  Diluted  Earnings  Per  Share  of  7.0 million  is  primarily  attributable  to  the  above  impact  and  the  dilutive  impact  of
the   common   stock   equivalents   associated   with   the   Mandatorily   Redeemable   Convertible   Preferred   Stock   issued   in   Decem-
ber 2001  (734,000  and  40,203  weighted  average  shares,  in  2002  and  2001  respectively),  and  the  dilutive  impact  of  unexercised
employee  and  director  stock  options.

Supplemental  Information — Australian  Railroad  Group

The  Company  accounts  for  its  50%  ownership  in  ARG  under  the  equity  method  of  accounting.  As  a  result  of  the  strengthening  of
the   Australian   dollar   in   2002,   the   average   currency   translation   rate   for   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002   was   5.2%   more
favorable   than   the   rate   for   the   year   ended   December  31,   2001,   the   impact   of   which   should   be   considered   in   the   following
discussions  of  equity  earnings,  freight  and  non-freight  operating  revenues,  and  operating  expenses.

In  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001,  the  Company  recorded  $8.5  million  and  $8.5 million,  respectively,  of  equity
earnings  from  ARG,  which  is  reported  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  statements  of  income  under  the  caption  Equity  in  Net
Income  of  International  Affiliates — Australia.  The  following  table  provides  ARG’s  freight  revenues,  carloads  and  average  freight
revenues  per  carload  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

2 7

Freight  Revenues

Australian  Railroad  Group  Freight  Revenues  and  Carloads  by  Commodity  Group
Years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands,  except  average  per  carload)

Commodity Group

Freight Revenues

Carloads

2002

% of
Total

2001

% of
Total

2002

% of
Total

2001

% of
Total

Average
Freight
Revenue
Per Carload

2002

2001

Grain

$ 53,590

30.5% $ 49,757

30.2% 177,651

20.5% 171,037

20.2% $302

$291

Other Ores and Minerals

Iron Ore

Alumina

Bauxite

Hook and Pull(Haulage)

Gypsum

Other

Total

38,075

27,038

13,828

10,125

8,343

2,327

21.7%

15.4%

7.9%

5.8%

4.8%

1.3%

42,064

20,594

15,309

9,334

10,556

1,980

25.6% 99,816

11.5% 101,257

12.0% 381

12.5% 177,619

20.5% 159,038

18.8% 152

9.3% 151,756

17.5% 145,073

5.7% 127,892

14.8% 127,263

17.1%

15.0%

91

79

6.4% 24,628

2.9% 43,628

5.2% 339

1.2% 42,389

4.9% 38,837

4.6%

55

22,114

12.6%

14,977

9.1% 63,724

7.4% 60,625

7.1% 347

$175,440

100.0% $164,571

100.0% 865,475

100.0% 846,758

100.0% 203

415

129

106

73

242

51

247

194

ARG’s  freight  revenues  were  $175.4 million  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  $164.6 million  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  $10.8 million  or  6.6%.  This  increase  was  primarily  attributable  to  increases  in  iron  ores   of
$6.4  million,   grain   of   $4.7  million   and   other   of   $7.1   million,   offset   by   decreases   in   alumina   of   $1.5  million,   hook   and   pull   of
$2.2  million   and   other   ores   and   minerals   of   $4.0  million.   Freight   revenues   from   hauling   iron   ores   were   up   primarily   due   to
expansion  by  one  of  ARG’s  major  iron  ores  customers.  Freight  revenues  from  hauling  grain  were  up  primarily  due  to  a  stronger
harvest  in  Western  Australia,  offset  by  lower  grain  revenues  in  South  Australia  due  to  a  weaker  harvest.  Freight  revenues  from
hauling  alumina  were  down  due  to  lowered  rates  after  new  contracts  went  into  effect  with  major  customers.  The  decline  in  hook
and   pull   was   primarily   business   that   was   handled   for   two   Australian   companies   prior   to   their   joint   acquisition   of a   competing
railroad.

Total  ARG  carloads  were  865,475  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002  compared  to  846,758  in  the  year  ended  December 31,
2001,  an  increase  of  18,717  or  2.2%.  The  average  revenue  per  carload  increased  to  $203  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,
compared  to  $194  per  carload  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  4.6%,  due  to  the  strength  of  the  Australian
dollar  relative  to  the  U.S.  dollar  in  2002  versus  2001.

Non-Freight  Revenues

ARG’s  non-freight  revenues  were  $35.6 million  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2002  compared  to  $23.9 million  in  the  year  ended
December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  $11.7 million  or  48.9%.  This  increase  included  $13.4 million  of  revenues  from  the  construction
of  the  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  rail  line.

The  following  table  compares  ARG’s  non-freight  revenues  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001:

Australian  Railroad  Group
Non-Freight  Operating  Revenues  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands)

Third party track access fees

Alice Springs to Darwin Line

Fuel sales

Other operating income

Total non-freight revenues

2 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

2002

% of
Total

2001

% of
Total

$13,744

38.6% $13,042

54.5%

13,421

4,636

3,826

37.7%

13.0%

10.7%

—

6,776

4,101

0.0%

28.3%

17.2%

$35,627

100.0% $23,919

100.0%

ARG  Operating  Expenses

ARG’s  operating  expenses  were  $164.6 million  in  the  year  ended  December  31,  2002,  compared  to  $141.1 million  in  the  year
ended  December 31,  2001,  an  increase  of  $23.5 million  or  16.7%.  The  following  table  sets  forth  a  comparison  of ARG’s  operating
expenses  in  the  years  ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001:

Australian  Railroad  Group
Operating  Expense  Comparison
Years  Ended  December 31,  2002  and  2001
(U.S.  dollars  in  thousands)

Labor and benefits

Equipment rents

Purchased services

Depreciation and amortization

Diesel fuel

Casualties and insurance

Materials

Net gain on sale and impairment of assets

Other expenses

Total operating expenses

2002

2001

Percent
of
Operating
Revenue

Dollars

Percent
of
Operating
Revenue

Dollars

$ 39,320

18.6% $ 36,922

1,118

49,386

17,191

17,530

10,541

7,530

(314)

22,294

0.5%

23.4%

8.1%

8.3%

5.0%

3.6%

(0.1%)

10.6%

684

40,128

13,392

20,611

3,044

8,731

(152)

17,735

19.6%

0.4%

21.3%

7.1%

10.9%

1.6%

4.6%

(0.1%)

9.5%

$164,596

78.0% $141,095

74.9%

Labor  and  benefits,  as  a  percentage  of  revenue,  decreased  to  18.6%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  19.6%
in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001.  In  local  currency,  labor  and  benefits  expense  increased  1.4%. The  increase  was  primarily
due  to  a  restructuring  charge  related  to  personnel  reductions  and  office  relocation  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  2002,  partially  offset  by
savings  related  to  head  count  reductions  in  2001  that  were  planned  as  part  of  the  acquisition  of  Westrail  Freight.

Purchased  services,  as  a  percentage  of  revenue,  increased  to  23.4%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  21.3%
in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001.  The  increase  was  primarily  caused  by  increased  track  maintenance  work  and  increased
truck  transportation  expenses  related  to  the  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  construction  project.  In  local  currency,  purchased  services
expense  increased  17.0%.

Depreciation  and  amortization  expense  increased  to  8.1%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  7.1%  in  the  year
ended   December  31,   2001,   due   to   increased   capital   expenditures.   In   local   currency,   depreciation   and   amortization   expense
increased  21.5%.

Diesel  fuel  expense  decreased  to  8.3%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  10.9%  in  the  year  ended  Decem-
ber  31,   2001,   due   to   a   decrease   in   third   party   sales   and   lower   fuel   prices.   In   local   currency,   diesel   fuel   expense   decreased
19.2%.

Casualties   and   insurance   increased   to   5.0%   of   revenue   in   the   year   ended   December  31,   2002,   compared   to   1.6%   in   the   year
ended   December  31,   2001,   primarily   due   to   an   increase   of   $4.3  million   in   the   cost   of   incidents   including   derailments   and   an
increase  of  $1.6 million  in  insurance  premiums.  In  local  currency,  casualties  and  insurance  expense  increased  229.3%.

Materials  expense  as  a  percentage  of  revenue  decreased  to  3.6%  in  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002,  compared  to  4.6%  in
the  year  ended  December 31,  2001.

Other   expenses   increased   to   10.6%   of   revenue   in   the   year   ended   December   31,   2002,   compared   to   9.5%   in   the   year   ended
December 31,  2001.  The  increase  was  primarily  due  to additional  costs  associated  with  the  Alice  Springs  to  Darwin  project.  In
local  currency,  other  expenses  increased  21.6%.

Income  Taxes

ARG’s   effective   income   tax   rate   in   the   years   ended   December  31,   2002   and   2001   was   24.6%   and   33.7%,   respectively.   The
decrease  in  2002  was  attributable  to  recording  the  tax  benefit  on  amortization  associated  with  the  prepaid  lease  on  track  assets
acquired  from  the  government  in  December 2000.  The  lease  is  with  a  government  tax  exempt  entity,  and  the  determination  of  the
tax   base   involved   the   application   of   complex   legislation.   During   2002,   ARG   began   to   recognize   the   tax   benefit   on   the   prepaid
lease  amortization  for  the  first  time.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

2 9

NORTH AMERICAN LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During  2003,  2002  and  2001,  the  Company  generated  $46.9 million,  $27.6  million  and  $28.6 million,  respectively,  of  cash  from
operations.   The   2003   increase   over   2002   was   primarily   due   to   the   following   items,   increased   net   income   of   $3.1  million,
increased   depreciation   and   amortization   of   $1.9   million,   increased   deferred   taxes   of   $3.2  million,   decreased   net   gain   on   asset
sales  and  impairments  of  $3.1 million,  and  a  net  decrease  in  elements  of  working  capital  of  $10.4 million,  offset  by  a  net  decrease
of   $2.4  million in   all   other   operating   items.   The   decrease   from   2001   to   2002   was   primarily   due   to   the   net   increase   in   working
capital  during  2002  compared  to  the  net  decrease  in  working  capital  during  2001.

During   2003,   2002   and   2001   the   Company’s   cash   flow   used   in   investing   activities   was   $75.9  million,   $103.0  million   and
$37.4 million,  respectively.  For  2003,  primary  drivers  of  the  investing  activities  were  the  acquisition  of  the  ALM,  CIRR  and  F&P  for
$54.9 million  and  capital  expenditures  of  $23.0 million.  Capital  expenditures  consisted  of  $14.7 million  for  track  improvements  net
of  funds  received  from  governmental  grants,  and  $8.3 million  for  equipment  and  rolling  stock  which  included  $4.1 million  for  a
locomotive   upgrade   project.   For   2002,   primary   drivers   of   the   investing   activities   were   the   acquisitions   of   the   Utah   Railway
Company   and   Emons   Transportation   Group   for   a   total   of   $85.1   million   and   capital   expenditures   of   $22.3  million.   Capital
expenditures  consisted  of  $9.0 million  for  track  improvements  net  of  funds  received  from  governmental  grants  and  $7.9 million  for
equipment   and   rolling   stock   which   included   $2.0  million   for   a   locomotive   upgrade   project.   For   2001,   primary   drivers   of   the
investing  activities  were  the  acquisition  of  South  Buffalo  Railway,  net  of  cash  received  for  $33.1 million  and  capital  expenditures
of  $16.6 million,  offset  by  $8.1 million  in  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  assets  and  $4.1 million  in  net  cash  received  from  unconsoli-
dated  affiliates.  Capital  expenditures  consisted  of  $12.1 million  for  track  improvements  net  of  funds  received  from  governmental
grants  and  $4.5 million  for  equipment  and  rolling  stock.

During   2003,   2002   and   2001   the   Company’s   cash   flow   provided   by   financing   activities   was   $28.4  million,   $59.1  million   and
$32.3  million,   respectively.   For   2003,   primary   drivers   of   the   financing   activities   were   a   net   increase   in   outstanding   debt   of
$26.9 million  and  cash  proceeds  of  $2.9 million  from the exercise  of  stock  options  and  stock  purchases  by  employees,  offset  by
dividends   paid   on   the   Preferred   of   $1.0  million.   For   2002,   primary   drivers   of   the   financing   activities   were   a   net   increase   in
outstanding   debt   of   $61.6  million   and   net proceeds   from   the   exercise   of   stock   options   and   stock   purchases   by   employees   of
$3.1 million,  offset  by  debt  issuance  costs  of  $4.6  million  and  dividends  paid  on  the  Preferred  of  $1.0 million.  For  2001,  primary
drivers   of   the   financing   activities   were   net   proceeds   of   $66.5  million   from   the   issuance   of   Common   Stock,   net   proceeds   of
$4.8  million   from   the   issuance   of   Preferred   Stock,   proceeds   of   $6.3  million   from   the   exercise   of   stock   options   and   stock
purchases  by  employees,  offset  by  a  net  decrease  in  outstanding  debt  of  $43.0 million  and  dividends  paid  on  the  Preferred  of
$900,000.

At   December  31,   2003   the   Company   had   long-term   debt,   including   current   portion,   totaling   $158.0  million,   which   comprised
35.2%   of   its   total   capitalization   including   the   Convertible   Preferred.   At   December  31,   2002   the   Company   had   long-term   debt,
including   current   portion,   totaling   $125.4  million,   which   comprised   34.9%   of   its   total   capitalization   including   the   Convertible
Preferred.

U.S.  and  Canadian  Credit  Facilities

On  October 31,  2002,  the  Company  amended  and  restated  its  senior  secured  credit  facilities  thereby  increasing  the  facilities  to
$250.0 million.  The  facilities  are  composed  of  a  $223.0 million  revolving  loan  and  a  US$27.0  million  Canadian  term  loan,  each
maturing  in  2007.  The  Canadian  term  loan  is  funded  in  Canadian  dollars  and  principal  and  interest  payments  on  the  term  loan  are
made  in  Canadian  dollars.  Under  the  terms  of  the  financing,  the  Company  may  expand  the  size  of  the  facilities  to  $350.0 million  if
certain  criteria  are  met  in  the  future.  A  portion  of  the  new  $250.0 million  facilities  was  used  to  refinance  approximately  $100.0 mil-
lion   of   existing   debt   owed   by   the   Company’s   U.S.   and   Canadian   subsidiaries.   The   remaining   $150.0  million   ($113.4  million   at
December 31,  2003)  of  unused  borrowing  capacity  is  available  for  general  corporate  purposes  including  acquisitions.  In  conjunc-
tion   with   the   refinancing,   the   Company   recorded   a   non-cash   after-tax   write   off   of   $375,000   related   to   unamortized   deferred
financing  costs  of  the  refinanced  debt.

The   Canadian   term   loan   is   due   in   quarterly   installments   which   began   March   31,   2003,   and   matures,   along   with   the   revolving
credit  facilities,  on October  31,  2007.  The  credit  facilities  accrue  interest  at  rates  based  on  various  indices  plus  an  applicable
margin,  which  varies  from  1.75  to  2.5 percentage  points  depending  upon  the  ratio  of  the  Company’s  funded  debt  to  Earnings
Before   Interest,   Taxes,   Depreciation,   Amortization   and   Operating   Leases   (EBITDAR),   as   defined   in   the   credit   agreement.   The
Company  pays  a  commitment  fee  on  all  unused  portions  of  the  revolving  credit  facility  which  varies  between  0.375%  and  0.500%
per  annum  depending  on  the  Company’s  funded  debt  to  EBITDAR  ratio.  The  credit  agreement  requires  mandatory  prepayments
from  the  issuance  of  new  equity  or  debt  and  from  the  proceeds  of  asset  sales  that  are  not  reinvested  in  capital  assets  in  certain
periods  of  time,  as  defined  in  the  agreement.  The  credit  facilities  are  collateralized  by  essentially  all  the  Company’s  assets  in  the
United  States  and  Canada.  The  credit  agreement  requires  the  maintenance  of  certain  covenant  ratios  or  amounts,  including,  but
not  limited  to,  funded  debt  to  EBITDAR,  interest  coverage,  minimum  net  worth,  and  maximum  capital  expenditures,  all  as  defined
in  the  agreement.  The  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  were  in  compliance  with  the  provisions  of  these  covenants  as  of  Decem-
ber 31,  2003.

During  2001,  the  Company  completed  two  amendments  to  its  primary  credit  agreement  (neither  of  which  affected  the  terms  of
the  debt)  to  enable  the  Company’s  acquisition  of  South  Buffalo,  the  issuance  of  Class A  Common  Stock,  and  the  acquisition  of
Emons.

3 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Mexican  Financings

On   December  7,   2000,   one   of   the   Company’s   subsidiaries   in   Mexico,   Servicios,   entered   into   three   promissory   notes   payable
(Notes)  totaling  $27.5  million  with  variable  interest  rates  based  on  LIBOR  plus  3.5 percentage  points.  Two  of  the  Notes  have  an
eight  year  term  with  principal  payments  of  $1.4  million  due  semi-annually  beginning  March 15,  2003,  through  the  maturity  date  of
September  15,   2008.   The   third   Note   has   a   nine   year   term   with   principal   payments   of   $750,000   due   semi-annually   beginning
March 15,  2003,  with  a  maturity  date  of  September 15,  2009.  The  Notes  are  secured  by  essentially  all  the  assets  of  Servicios  and
its   subsidiary,   Compa ˜n´ıa   de   Ferrocarriles   Chiapas-Mayab,   S.A.   de   C.V.,   (FCCM),   and   a   pledge   of   the   Company’s   shares   of
Servicios  and  FCCM.  The  Company  is  obligated  to  provide  up  to  $8.0 million  of  funding  to  its  Mexican  subsidiaries,  if  necessary,
to   meet   their   investment   or   financial   obligations   prior   to   completing   the   investment   phase   of   the   project   funded   by   the   Notes
(‘‘Physical   Completion’’),   consisting   of   several   obligations   related   to   capital   investments,   operating   performance   and   manage-
ment  systems  and  controls. In  addition, the  Company is  obligated  to  provide $7.5 million  in  funding  to  Servicios  to  meet  its  debt
service  obligations  prior  to  completing  the  financial  phase  of  the  project  (‘‘Financial  Completion’’),  consisting  of  several  financial
performance  thresholds. At  present,  FCCM  has  yet  to  achieve  Physical  Completion  or  Financial  Completion. Based  on  current
circumstances,  it  is  reasonably  likely  that  the  Company  will  have  to  fund  a  portion  of  its funding  obligation  in  order  to  meet  the
future  principal  repayment  obligations  of  the  Notes.  The  Notes  contain  certain  financial  covenants  which  Servicios  is  in  compli-
ance  with  as  of  December 31,  2003.

In   conjunction   with   the   refinancing   of   FCCM   and   Servicios, the International   Finance   Corporation   (IFC)   (the   primary   lender   to
Servicios)  invested  $1.9 million  of  equity  for  a  12.7%  indirect  interest  in  FCCM,  through  its  parent  company  Servicios  (See  Notes
3  and  9  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements).  Along  with  its  equity  investment,  IFC  received  a  put  option  exercisable  in  2005  to
sell   its   equity   stake   back   to   the   Company.   The   put   price   will   be   based   on   a   multiple   of   earnings   before   interest,   taxes,
depreciation  and  amortization.  The  Company  increases  its  minority  interest  expense if  the  value  of  the  put  option  exceeds  the
minority  interest.  This  put  option  may  result  in  a  future  cash  outflow  of  the  Company.

Mexican  Fuel  Tax  Credits

Until   January  2004, as   a   railroad, FCCM was   permitted   to apply   diesel   fuel   tax   credits   it   earned   to   a   variety   of   its   federal   tax
obligations,  including  income  taxes,  payroll  taxes  and  value  added  taxes.  In  2003,  FCCM  utilized  approximately  $3.3 million  in
such  fuel  tax  credits.  However,  in  January 2004,  Mexican  tax  authorities  issued  a  ruling  that allows  railroads  to  apply  these  tax
credits   only   to   income   tax   related   obligations.   Company   personnel   are   working   with   the   Secretary   of   Communications   and
Transportation  and  Mexican  tax  authorities  to  attempt  to  change  the  recent  tax  ruling,  but  the  Company  can  offer  no  assurance
that  it  will  be  successful. If  this  ruling  were  to  hold,  FCCM  would  face  additional  annual  cash  payment  obligations  for  the  next  few
years  until  it  generates  sufficient  taxable  income  to  utilize  such  credits.  This  additional  burden  will  make  it  more  difficult  for  FCCM
and  Servicios  to  satisfy  their  debt  obligations  and  increases  the  likelihood  that  the  Company  will  have  to  fund  all  or  a  portion  of
its funding  obligation.

South  America

The  Company  has  a  22.89%  indirect  ownership  interest  in  Empresa  Ferroviaria  Oriental,  S.A.  (Oriental)  which  is  located  in  eastern
Bolivia.  The  Company  holds  its  equity  interest  in  Oriental  through  a  number  of  intermediate  holding  companies,  and  the  Company
accounts   for   its   interest   in   Oriental   under   the   equity   method   of   accounting.   The   Company   indirectly   holds   a   12.52%   equity
interest  in  Oriental  through  an  interest  in  Genesee  &  Wyoming  Chile  (GWC),  and  the  Company  holds  its  remaining  10.37%  equity
interest  in  Oriental  through  other  companies.  GWC  is  an  obligor  of  non-recourse  debt  of  $12.0 million,  which  has  an  adjustable
interest  rate  dependent  on  operating  results  of  Oriental.  This  non-recourse  debt  is  secured  by  a  lien  over  GWC’s  indirect  equity
interest  in  Oriental.

This  debt  became  due  and  payable  on  November 2,  2003.  Due  to  the  political  and  economic  unrest  and  uncertainties  in  Bolivia,  it
has  become  difficult  for  GWC  to  refinance  this  debt  and  the  Company  has  chosen  not  to  repay  the  non-recourse  obligation.  GWC
entered  into  discussions  with  its  creditors  on  plans  to  restructure  the  debt,  and  as  a  result  of  those  discussions,  GWC  obtained  a
written   waiver   from   the   creditors   which   expired   on   January  31,   2004.   Negotiations   with   the   creditors   continue,   and   currently,
none  of  GWC’s  creditors  have  commenced  court  proceedings  to  (i) collect  on  the  debt  or  (ii) exercise  their  rights  pursuant  to  the
lien.

If  the  Company  were  to  lose  its  12.52%  equity  stake  in  Oriental  due  to  creditors  exercising  their  lien  on  GWC’s  indirect  equity
interest  in  Oriental,  the  Company  would  record  a  $232,000  write-off,  the  basis  of  its  investment  in  Oriental  held  through  GWC.
Because   the   $12.0  million of debt   is   serviced   by   income received   by   GWC   from   Oriental,   the   Company’s   loss   of   the   12.52%
equity  interest  in  Oriental  would  not  have  a  material  adverse  impact  on  the  Company’s  future  equity  income.  A  default,  accelera-
tion  or  effort  to  foreclose  on  the  lien  under  the  non-recourse  debt  will  have  no  impact  on  the  Company’s  remaining  10.37%  equity
interest   in   Oriental,   because   that   equity   interest   is   held   indirectly   through   holding   companies   outside   of   GWC’s   ownership   in
Oriental.  The  Company  plans  to  continue  providing  management  resources  to  Oriental  and  generates  substantially  all  of  its  equity
income  through  the  10.37%  ownership  interest.

Oriental  has  no  obligations  associated  with  the  $12.0 million of debt.  In  addition,  a  default,  acceleration  or  effort  to  foreclose  on
the   lien   under   the   non-recourse   debt   would   not   result   in   a   breach   of   a   representation,   warranty,   covenant,   cross-default   or
acceleration  under  the  Company’s  Senior  Credit  Facility.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

3 1

Universal  Shelf  Registration

In   November  2001,   the   Company   completed   a   universal   shelf   registration   of   up   to   $200.0  million   of   various   debt   and   equity
securities.  The  form  and  terms  of  such  securities  are  determined  when  and  if  these  securities  are  issued.  On  December 21,  2001,
as  an  initial  draw  on  the  shelf  registration,  the  Company  sold  5.85 million  shares  of  Class A  Common  Stock  in  a  public  offering  at
a  price  of  $12.33  per  share  for  net  proceeds  of  $66.5 million.  The  proceeds  were  used  to  pay  down  revolving  debt  under  the
Company’s  primary  credit  agreement  and  for  general  corporate  purposes.  The  Company  has  the  ability  to  draw  on  its  remaining
universal  shelf  registration  for  up  to  $128.5 million  of  various  debt  and  equity  securities.

Equipment  Leases

On   March  30,   2001,   the   Company   completed   the   sale   of   certain   rolling   stock   to   a   financial   institution   for   a   net   sale   price   of
$6.5 million.  The  proceeds  were  used  to  reduce  borrowings  under  the  Company’s  revolving  credit  facilities.  Simultaneously,  the
Company  entered  into  an  agreement  with  this  financial  institution  to  lease  this  rolling  stock  for  a  period  of  eight  years  including
automatic  renewals.

The  Company  anticipates  renewing  the  above-mentioned  lease  at  all  available  lease  renewal  dates.  If  the  Company  chooses  not
to   renew   this   and   certain   other   leases,   it   would   be   obligated   to   return   the   rolling   stock   and   pay   maximum   aggregate   fees   of
approximately  $8.6 million.  Under  certain  of  these  leases,  in  lieu  of  this  payment,  the  Company  has  the  option  to  purchase  the
rolling   stock   for   approximately   $22.1  million   in   the   aggregate.   Management   anticipates   the   future   market   value   of   the   leased
rolling  stock  will  equal  or  exceed  the  payments  necessary  to  purchase  the  rolling  stock.

Purchase  of  Rail-One  Inc. — Expiring  Stock  Options

On  April 15,  1999,  the  Company  purchased  the  ownership  interests  of  one  of  its  joint  venture  partners  in  Canada,  Rail-One  Inc.
(Rail-One)  which  had  a  47.5%  ownership  interest  in  Genesee  Rail-One  Inc.  (GRO),  thereby  increasing  the  Company’s  ownership
of  GRO  to  95%.  Under  the  terms  of  the  purchase  agreement,  among  other  things,  the  sellers  of  Rail-One  were  granted  the  right
to  purchase  up  to  270,000  shares  of  the  Company’s  Class A  Common  Stock  at  an  exercise  price  of  $2.56  per  share  if  GRO  had
achieved  certain  financial  performance  targets  in  any  annual  period  between  1999  and  2003.  The  Company has determined  that
GRO  failed  to  achieve  these  financial  performance  targets  in  any  of  the  required  years.

Government  Grants

The  Company’s  railroads  have  entered  into  a  number  of  rehabilitation  or  construction  grants  with  state  and  federal  agencies.  The
grant  funds  are  used  as  a  supplement  to  the  Company’s  normal  capital  programs.  In  return  for  the  grants,  the  railroads  pledge  to
maintain  various  levels  of  service  and  maintenance  on  the  rail  lines  that  have  been  rehabilitated  or  constructed.  The  Company
believes  that  the  levels  of  service  and  maintenance  required  under  the  grants  are  not  materially  different  from  those  that  would  be
required  without  the  grant  obligation.  In  addition  to  government  grants,  customers  occasionally  provide  fixed  funding  of  certain
track  rehabilitation  or  construction  projects  to  facilitate  the  Company’s  service  over  that  track.  The  Company  records  any  excess
in  the  fixed  funding  compared  to  the  actual  cost  of  rehabilitation  and  construction  as  gains  in  the  current  period.  The  Company
received  government  grants  totaling  $2.0 million,  $8.8 million  and  $4.0 million  in  2003,  2002  and  2001,  respectively.  While  the
Company   has   benefited   from   these   grant   funds   in   recent   years,   there   can   be   no   assurance   that   the   funds   will   continue   to   be
available.

2004  Budgeted  Capital  Expenditures

The   Company   has   budgeted   approximately   $29.2  million   in   capital   expenditures   in   2004,   of   which   $19.8  million   is   for   track
rehabilitation  and  $9.4 million  is  for  equipment.  Included  in  the  budget  is  approximately  $2.7  million  to  exercise  an  early  buyout  of
36  leased  locomotives  and  approximately  $2.6 million  to  purchase  and  rehabilitate  16  miles  of  track  to  access  a  new  coal-fired
power  plant  customer.

The  Company  has  historically  relied  primarily  on  cash  generated  from  operations  to  fund  working  capital  and  capital  expenditures
relating  to  ongoing  operations,  while  relying  on  borrowed  funds  and  stock  issuances  to  finance  acquisitions  and  investments  in
unconsolidated   affiliates.   The   Company   believes   that   its   cash   flow   from   operations   together   with   amounts   available   under   the
credit  facilities  will  enable  the  Company  to  meet  its  liquidity  and  capital  expenditure  requirements  relating  to  ongoing  operations
for  at  least  the  duration  of  the  credit  facilities.

3 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Contractual  Obligations  and  Commercial  Commitments

The   following   table   represents   the   Company’s   obligations   and   commitments   for   future   cash   payments   under   debt   and   lease
agreements  as  of  December 31,  2003 (dollars  in  thousands):

Contractual Obligations

Long-Term Debt Obligations

Capital Lease Obligations

Operating Lease Obligations

Purchase Obligations

Total

Off-Balance  Sheet  Arrangements

Payments Due By Period

Total

Less than
1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

More than
5 years

$158,022

$ 6,589

$12,706

$136,426

$2,301

—

43,025

1,678

—

12,224

378

—

17,731

1,300

—

9,964

—

—

3,106

—

$202,725

$19,191

$31,737

$146,390

$5,406

The  Company  has  no  off-balance  sheet  arrangements  as  required  to  be  disclosed pursuant  to  Item 303(a)(4)  of  regulation  S-K.

Supplemental  Information — Australian  Railroad  Group

In   December  2003,   ARG   refinanced   all   of   its   senior   debt   outstanding through   new   senior   credit   facilities   (‘‘the   new   Credit
Facilities’’)   of $398.0  million.   The   new   Credit   Facilities   are   denominated   in   Australian   dollars.   By   drawing   down   approximately
$368.0 million  under  the  new  Credit  Facilities  and  using  previously  restricted  cash,  ARG  repaid $439.3 million  of  senior  debt.  The
new   Credit   Facilities   are   composed   of   a $150.2   million   revolving   loan   maturing   in   2008,   a $90.1  million   term   loan   maturing   in
2008,  a $150.2 million  term  loan  expiring  in  2010,  and  a $7.5 million  working  capital  facility.  The  credit  facilities  accrue  interest  at
rates  based  on  various  indices  plus  an  applicable  margin,  which  varies  from  0.70  to  1.25 percentage  points  based  on  the  ratio  of
its  EBITDA  to  interest  expense,  as  defined  in  the  credit  agreements.  ARG  pays  a  commitment  fee  on  all  unused  portions  of  the
credit  facilities  which  varies  from  0.3  to  0.4  percentage  points.  The  credit  facilities  include  limited  negative  pledge  covenants  but
permit  prepayment.  The  credit  facilities  require  the  maintenance  of  certain  covenant  ratios  or  amounts,  including,  but  not  limited
to,   interest   expense   to   EBITDA,   and   total   debt   to   total   assets,   all   as   defined   in   the   credit   agreements.   (Dollar   amounts   noted
above  apply  the  year-end  2003  exchange  rate  of  0.75  U.S.  dollars  per  Australian  dollar.)

Critical  Accounting  Policies  and  Use  of  Estimates

The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles  requires  management  to  use
judgment  and  to  make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  reported  assets,  liabilities,  revenues  and  expenses;  actual  results
may  differ  from  such  estimates.  The  diversity  of  the  Company’s  services,  customers,  geographic  operations,  sources  of  supply
and  markets  reduces  the  risk  that  any  one  event  would  have  a  severe  impact  on  the  Company’s  operating  results.  Those  areas
requiring   the   greatest   degree   of   management   judgment   or   deemed   most   critical   to   the   Company’s   financial   reporting   are
discussed  below.

Management  has  discussed  the  development  and  selection  of  the  critical  accounting  estimates  described  below  with  the  Audit
Committee   of   the   Board   of   Directors   and   the   Audit   Committee   has   reviewed   the   Company’s   disclosure   relating   to   it   in   this
Management’s  Discussion  and  Analysis  of  Financial  Condition  and  Results  of  Operations.

Goodwill  and  Intangible  Assets  Acquired  in  Business  Combinations

The  valuation  of  intangible  assets  acquired  in  business  combinations  requires  management  to  use  judgment  and  make  estimates
that  are  critical  to  the  Company’s  financial  reports.  The  Company  adopted  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No. 142
(SFAS   No.  142)   as   of   January  1,   2002.   Under   this   pronouncement,   a   two-step   goodwill   impairment   model   is   used.   Step   1
compares  the  fair  value  of  the  reporting  unit  with  its  carrying  amount,  including  goodwill.  If  the  fair  value  of  the  reporting  unit  is
less   than   the   carrying   amount,   goodwill   would   be   considered   impaired   and   Step   2   measures   the   goodwill   impairment   as   the
excess   of   recorded   goodwill   over   its   implied   fair   value.   The   Company   tests   impairment   on   an   annual   basis   or   when   specific
triggering  events  occur.

Recoverability  and  Realization  of  Tangible  Assets

The   Company   continually   evaluates   whether   events   and   circumstances   have   occurred   that   indicate   that   its   long-lived   tangible
assets   may   not   be   recoverable.   When   factors   indicate   that   assets   should   be   evaluated   for   possible   impairment,   the   Company
uses  an  estimate  of  the  related  undiscounted  future  cash  flows  over  the  remaining  lives  of  assets  in  measuring  whether  or  not
impairment  has  occurred.  If  impairment  is  identified,  a  loss  would  be  reported  to  the  extent  that  the  carrying  value  of  the  related
assets   exceeds   the   fair   value   of   those   assets   as   determined   by   valuation   techniques   available   in   the   circumstances.   The
Company  closely  monitors  its  assets  in  foreign  operations  where  fluctuating  currencies  and  unsettled  economic  conditions  can
create   greater   uncertainty.   The   Company   adopted   SFAS   No.  144   ‘‘Accounting   for   the   Impairment   or   Disposal   of   Long-lived
Assets’’  effective  January 1,  2002.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

3 3

Derailment  and  Property  Damages,  Personal  Injuries  and  Third  Party  Claims

The   Company   maintains   insurance,   with   varying   deductibles   up   to   $500,000   per   incident   for   liability   and   up   to   $500,000   per
incident  for  property  damage,  for  claims  resulting  from  train  derailments  and  other  accidents  related  to  its  railroad  and  industrial
switching   operations.   Accruals   for FELA   claims   by   the   Company’s   railroad   employees   and third party   personal   injury   or   other
claims,  limited  when  appropriate  to  the  applicable  deductible,  are  recorded  when  such  claims  are  first  reported  and  estimates  are
updated  as  information  develops.

Pensions  and  Other  Post-Retirement  Benefits

The  Company  administers  two  noncontributory  defined  benefit  plans  for  union  and  non-union  employees  of  two  U.S.  subsidiaries.
Benefits   are   determined   based   on   a   fixed   amount   per   year   of   credited   service.   The   Company’s   funding   policy   is   to   make
contributions  for  pension  benefits  based  on  actuarial  computations  which  reflect  the  long-term  nature  of  the  plans.  The  Company
has  met  the  minimum  funding  requirements  according  to  the  Employee  Retirement  Income  Security  Act. On  January 31,  2002,
the  Company  froze  the  defined  benefit  plan  for  non-union  employees.  Effective  that  date,  new  employees  will  not  be  eligible  to
participate  in  this  plan,  and  future  earnings  for  current  participants  will  not  be  eligible  in  the  computation  of  benefits  for  those
participants.

The  Company  provides  health  care  and  life  insurance  benefits  for  certain  retired  employees  including  union  employees  of  one  of
its  U.S.  subsidiaries  and  certain  nonunion  employees  who  have  reached  the  age  of  55  with  30  or  more  years  of  service.  As  of
December 31,  2003,  there  were  109  current  or  retired  employees  eligible  for  these  health  care  and  life  insurance  benefits.  Forty
of   the   employees   currently   participate   and   the   remaining   sixty-nine   employees   may   become   eligible   for   these   benefits   upon
retirement  if  certain  combinations  of  age  and  years  of  service  are  met.  The  Company  funds  the  plans  on  a  pay-as-you-go  basis.

Income  Taxes

The  Company  files  consolidated  U.S.  federal  income  tax  returns  which  include  all  of  its  U.S.  subsidiaries.  Each  of  the  Company’s
foreign  subsidiaries  files  appropriate  income  tax  returns  in  their  respective  countries.  No  provision  is  made  for  the  U.S.  income
taxes  applicable  to  the  undistributed  earnings  of  controlled  foreign  subsidiaries  as  it  is  the  intention  of  management  to  fully  utilize
those  earnings  in  the  operations  of  the  foreign  subsidiaries.  If  the  earnings  were  to  be  distributed  in  the  future,  those  distributions
may  be  subject  to  U.S.  income  taxes  (appropriately  reduced  by  available  foreign  tax  credits)  and  withholding  taxes  payable  to
various  foreign  countries.  The  amount  of  undistributed  earnings  of  the  Company’s  controlled  foreign  subsidiaries  as  of  Decem-
ber 31,  2003  is  $45.9  million.  It  is  not  practicable  to  determine  the  amount  of  U.S.  income  and  foreign  withholding  taxes  that
could  be  payable  if  a  distribution  of  earnings  were  to  occur.

Deferred  income  taxes  reflect  the  net  income  tax  effects  of  temporary  differences  between  the  carrying  amounts  of  assets  and
liabilities  for  financial  reporting  purposes  and  the  amounts  used  for  income  tax  purposes  as  well  as  available  income  tax  credits.
In  the  Company’s  consolidated  balance  sheets,  these  deferred  benefits  and  deferred  obligations  are  classified  as  current  or  non-
current  based  on  the  classification  of  the  related  asset  or  liability  for  financial  reporting.  A  deferred  tax  obligation  or  benefit  that  is
not   related   to   an   asset   or   liability   for   financial   reporting,   including   deferred   tax   assets   related   to   carry-forwards,   are   classified
according  to  the  expected  reversal  date  of  the  temporary  difference  as  of  the  end  of  the  year.

The   Company   had   net   operating   loss   carry-forwards   from   its   Mexican   operations   in   2003   and   2002   of   $19.8  million   and
$21.2 million,  respectively.  The  Mexican  losses,  for  income  tax  purposes,  relate  to  the  immediate  deduction  of a  portion  of the
purchase  price  paid  for  the  FCCM  operations  and  interest  expense  incurred  in  the  holding  company,  Servicios.  These  loss  carry-
forwards  will  expire  between  2009  and  2013.

The   Company   had   net   operating   loss   carry-forwards   from   its   Canadian   operations   as   of   December  31,   2003   and   2002   of
$0.8 million  and  $1.1 million,  respectively.  The  Canadian  losses  represent  losses  generated  prior  to  the  Company  gaining  control
of  those  operations  in  April 1999.  These  loss  carry-forwards  will  expire  in  2004.

A  significant  portion  of  the  deferred  tax  benefits  relate  to  the  Mexican  net  operating  loss  carry-forwards.  The  Company  believes
that  a  valuation  allowance  need  not  be  recorded  since  its  Mexican  business  will  generate  sufficient taxable income  to  utilize  all  of
the  deferred  tax  assets.  The  Company’s  Mexican  railroad  operations  are  currently  profitable  and  at  current  levels  will  generate
sufficient taxable income  to  utilize  the  net  operating  loss  carry-forwards  attributable  to  the  FCCM  business  prior  to  the  date  of
expiration.  In  addition,  Management  believes  that an  anticipated  merger  of  Servicios  and  FCCM will  enable  the  Company  to  use
the  future  taxable  income  to  offset  any  remaining  net  operating  losses  prior  to  the  date  of  expiration.

As   of   December  31,   2003   and   2002,   the   deferred   tax   asset   attributable   to   the   Canadian   net   operating   loss   carry-forward   had
been fully offset  by  a  valuation  allowance  of  $251,000  and  $450,000,  respectively.  In  2003,  the  valuation  allowance  decreased
approximately   $199,000   due   to   a   review   by   the   tax   authorities   and   the   subsequent   agreement   on   utilization   of   some   of   the
losses.  Management  does  not  anticipate  that  the  Company  will  generate  sufficient  future  taxable  income,  in  amount  or  character,
to   utilize   the   remaining   losses   prior   to   expiration.   The   valuation   allowance   was   established   in   the   acquisition   of   GRO,   and
accordingly,  if  reversed  will  result  in  a  decrease  to  goodwill.

Management   believes   that   full   consideration   has   been   given   to   all   relevant   circumstances   that   the   Company   may   be   currently
subject   to,   and   the   financial   statements   accurately   reflect   management’s   best   estimate   of   the   results   of   operations,   financial
condition  and  cash  flows  of  the  Company  for  the  years  presented.

3 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

RISK  FACTORS

The   Company’s   operations   and   financial   condition   are   subject   to   certain   risks   that   could   cause   actual   operating   and   financial
results   to   differ   materially   from   those   expressed   or   forecast   in   the   Company’s   forward-looking   statements,   including   the   risks
described  below  and  the  risks  identified  in  other  documents  which  are  filed  or  furnished  with  the  SEC.

-GENERAL RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY

If  the  Company  is  unable  to  consummate  additional  acquisitions  or  investments,  it  may  not  be  able  to  successfully
implement  its  growth  strategy.

The   Company’s   growth   strategy   is   based   on   the   Company   expanding   through   selective   acquisitions   of   and   investments   in   rail
properties,  both  in  new  regions  and  in  regions  in  which  the  Company  currently  operates.  The  success  of  the  Company’s  growth
strategy  will  depend  on,  among  other  things:

(cid:2) the  availability  of  suitable  candidates;

(cid:2) the  level  of  competition  from  other  companies  for  the  purchase  of  available  candidates;

(cid:2) the   Company’s   ability   to   value   those   candidates   accurately   and   negotiate   favorable   terms   for   those   acquisitions   and

investments;

(cid:2) the  Company’s  ability  to  identify  and  enter  into  mutually  beneficial  relationships  with  venture  partners;  and

(cid:2) the  availability  of  management  resources  to  oversee  the  integration  and  operation  of  the  acquired  businesses.

If  the  Company  is  not  successful  in  implementing  its  growth  strategy,  the  market  price  for  the  Company’s  Class A  Common  Stock
may  be  adversely  affected.

The  Company’s  inability  to  integrate  acquired  businesses  successfully  or  to  realize  the  anticipated  cost  savings  and
other  benefits  could  have  adverse  consequences  to  the  Company’s  business.

The  Company  has  experienced  significant  growth  through  acquisitions  and  the  Company  expects  to  continue  to  grow  through
additional  acquisitions.  Acquisitions generally result  in  increased  operating  and  administrative  costs  and,  to  the  extent  financed
with  debt,  additional  interest  costs.  The  Company may  not  be  able  to  manage  or  integrate  the  acquired  companies  or  businesses
successfully.  The  process  of  combining  acquired  businesses  may  be  disruptive  to  the  Company’s  business  and  may  cause  an
interruption or  reduction of  the  Company’s  business  as  a  result  of  the  following  factors,  among  others:

(cid:2) loss  of  key  employees  or  customers;

(cid:2) possible   inconsistencies   in   or   conflicts   between   standards,   controls,   procedures   and   policies   among   the   combined
companies  and  the  need  to  implement  company-wide  financial,  accounting,  information  technology  and  other  systems;

(cid:2) failure  to  maintain  the  quality  of  services  that  the  companies  have  historically  provided;

(cid:2) integrating   employees   of   rail   lines   acquired   from   Class  I   railroads,   governments   or   other   entities   into   the   Company’s

regional  railroad  culture;

(cid:2) failure  to  coordinate  geographically  diverse  organizations;  and

(cid:2) the  diversion  of  management’s  attention  from  the  Company’s  day-to-day  business  as  a  result  of  the  need  to  manage  any

disruptions  and  difficulties  and  the  need  to  add  management  resources  to  do  so.

These  disruptions  and  difficulties,  if  they  occur,  may  cause  the  Company  to  fail  to  realize  the  cost  savings,  revenue   enhance-
ments   and   other   benefits   that   the   Company   expects   to   result   from   integrating   acquired   companies,   and   may   cause   material
adverse  short-  and  long-term  effects  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

Even  if  the  Company  is  able  to  integrate  the  operations  of  acquired  businesses  into  its  operations,  the  Company  may  not  realize
the  full  benefits  of  the  cost  savings,  revenue  enhancements  or  other  benefits  that  it  may  have  expected  at  the  time  of  acquisition.
The   expected   revenue   enhancements   and   cost   savings   are   based   on   analyses   completed   by   members   of   the   Company’s
management.   These   analyses   necessarily   involve   assumptions   as   to   future   events,   including   general   business   and   industry
conditions,  operating  costs  and  competitive  factors,  many  of  which  are  beyond  the  Company’s  control  and  may  not  materialize.
While   the   Company   believes   these   analyses   and   their   underlying   assumptions   to   be   reasonable,   they   are   estimates   which   are
necessarily  speculative  in  nature.  In  addition,  even  if  the  Company  achieves  the  expected  benefits,  it  may  not  be  able  to  achieve
them  within  the  anticipated  time  frame.  Also,  the  cost  savings  and  other  synergies  from  these  acquisitions  may  be  offset  by  costs
incurred   in   integrating   the   companies,   increases   in   other   expenses,   operating   losses   or   problems   in   the   business   unrelated   to
these  acquisitions.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

3 5

Because  the  Company  depends  on  Class I  railroads  and  other  connecting  carriers  for  its  North  American  operations,
the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity  may  be  adversely  affected  if  the  Company’s  rela-
tionships  with  these  carriers  deteriorate.

The   railroad   industry   in   the   U.S.   and   Canada   is   dominated   by   7   Class  I   carriers   that   have   substantial   market   control   and
negotiating  leverage.  Almost  all  of  the  traffic  on  the  Company’s  U.S.  and  Canadian  railroads  is  interchanged  with  Class I  carriers.
A  decision  by  any  of  these  Class I  carriers  to  use  alternate  modes  of  transportation,  such  as  motor  carriers,  could  have  a  material
adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

The  Company’s  ability  to  provide  rail  service  to  customers  in  the  U.S.  and  Canada  depends  in  large  part  upon  the  Company’s
ability  to  maintain  cooperative  relationships  with  connecting  carriers  with  respect  to,  among  other  matters,  freight  rates,  revenue
divisions,   car   supply,   reciprocal   switching,   interchange   and   trackage   rights.   A   deterioration   in   the   operations   of,   or   service
provided  by,  those  connecting  carriers,  or  in  the  Company’s  relationship  with  those  connecting  carriers,  would  adversely  affect
the   Company’s   operating   results,   financial   condition   and   liquidity.   In   addition,   much   of   the   freight   transported   by   its   U.S.   and
Canadian   railroads   moves   on   railcars   supplied   by   Class  I   carriers.   If   the   number   of   railcars   supplied   by   Class  I   carriers   is
insufficient,  the  Company  might  not  be  able  to  obtain  replacement  railcars  on  favorable  terms  or  at  all  and  shippers  may  seek
alternate  forms  of  transportation.

Portions  of  the  Company’s  U.S.  and  Canadian  rail  properties  are  operated  under  leases,  operating  agreements  or  trackage  rights
agreements  with  Class I  carriers.  Failure  of  the  Company’s  railroads  to  comply  with  the  terms  of  these  leases  and  agreements  in
all  material  respects  could  result  in  the  loss  of  operating  rights  with  respect  to  those  rail  properties,  which  would  adversely  affect
the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.  Class I  carriers  also  have  traditionally  been  significant  sources
of  business  for  the  Company,  as  well  as  sources  of  potential  acquisition  candidates  as  they  divest  branch  lines  to  smaller  rail
operators.  Because  the  Company  depends  on  Class I  carriers  for  its  U.S.  and  Canadian  operations,  the  Company’s  operating
results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity  may  be  adversely  affected  if  the  Company’s  relationships  with  those  carriers  deteriorate.

While   the   majority   of   the   Company’s   Mexican   revenue   originates   and   terminates   on   the   Company’s   railroad,   the   Company   is
dependent   on   its   relationship   with   a   connecting   carrier   for   the   remainder   of   its   revenue.   To   the   extent   that   the   Company
experiences  service  disruptions  with  that  connecting  carrier,  the  Company’s  ability  to  serve  existing  customers  and  expand  its
business  will  suffer.

The  Company  faces  competition  from  numerous  sources,  including  those  relating  to  geography,  substitutable  prod-
ucts,  other  types  of  transportation  and  other  rail  operators.

Each  of  the  Company’s  railroads  is  typically  the  only  rail  carrier  directly  serving  its  customers.  The  Company’s  railroads,  however,
compete   directly   with   other   modes   of   transportation,   principally   motor   carriers   and, on   some   routes, ship,   barge   and   pipeline
operators.  The  Company  is  also  subject  to  geographic  and  product  competition.  For  example,  a  customer  could  shift  production
to  a  region  where  the  Company  does  not  have  operations  or  could  substitute  one  commodity  for  another  commodity  that  is  not
transported  by  rail.  In  either  case,  the  Company  would  lose  a  source  of  revenue,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on
the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

The   extent   of competition   varies   significantly   among   the   Company’s   railroads.   Competition   is   based   primarily   upon   the   rate
charged,  the  relative  costs  of  substitutable  products  and  the  transit  time  required.  In  addition,  competition  is  based  on  the  quality
and  reliability  of  the  service  provided.  Because a  large  majority  of  the  Company’s  freight  moves  involve  interchange  with  another
carrier,  the  Company  has  only  limited  control  over  the  price,  transit  time  or  quality  of  such  service.  Any  future  improvements  or
expenditures  materially  increasing  the  quality  of  these  alternative  modes  of  transportation  in  the  locations  in  which  the  Company
operates,  or  legislation  granting  materially  greater  latitude  for  motor  carriers  with  respect  to  size  or  weight  limitations,  could  have
a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

In  competing  for  the  acquisition  of  rail  properties,  the  Company  faces  other  acquirors  that  may  have  greater  financial  resources.
Competition   for   rail   properties   is   based   primarily   upon   price, and   the   seller’s   assessment   of   the   buyer’s   railroad   operating
expertise  and  financing  capability.  The  Company’s  inability  to  successfully  complete  additional  acquisitions  will  adversely  aff ect
the  implementation  of  an  important  part  of  its  growth  strategy.

The  Company  is  subject  to  significant  governmental  regulation  of  its  railroad  operations.  The  failure  to  comply  with
governmental  regulations  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condi-
tion  and  liquidity.

The   Company   is   subject   to   governmental   regulation   in   the   U.S.   by   a   significant   number   of   federal,   state   and   local   regulatory
authorities,  including  the STB,  the  Federal  Railroad  Administration  and  state  departments  of  transportation,  with  respect  to  the
Company’s   railroad   operations   and   a   variety   of   health,   safety,   labor,   environmental   and   other   matters.   The   Company   is   also
subject  to  regulatory  authorities  in  the  other  countries  in  which  it  operates.  The  Company’s  failure  to  comply  with  applicable  laws
and   regulations   could   have   a   material   adverse   effect   on   the   Company’s   operating   results,   financial   condition   and   liquidity.   In
addition,  governments  may  change  the  regulatory  framework  within  which  the  Company  operates  without  providing  the  Company
with  any  recourse  for  any  adverse  effects  that  the  change  may  have  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and
liquidity.  Also,  some  of  the  regulations  require  the  Company  to  obtain  and  maintain  various  licenses,  permits  and  other  authoriza-
tions,  and  the  Company may  not  continue  to  be  able  to  do  so.

3 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

The  Company  could  incur  significant  costs  for  violations  of,  or  liability  under,  environmental  laws  and  regulations.

The  Company’s  railroad  operations  and  real  estate  ownership  are  subject  to  extensive  foreign,  federal,  state  and  local  environ-
mental   laws   and   regulations   concerning,   among   other   things,   emissions   to   the   air,   discharges   to   waters,   and   the   handling,
storage,   transportation   and   disposal   of   waste   and   other   materials   and   cleanup   of   hazardous   material   or   petroleum   releases.
Environmental  liability  to  the  Company  may  arise  from  conditions  or  practices  at  properties  previously  owned  or  operated  by  the
Company,   properties   leased   by   the   Company,   and   other   properties   owned   by   third   parties   (for   example,   properties   at   which
hazardous  substances  or  wastes  for  which  the  Company  is  responsible  have  been  treated,  stored,  spilled  or  disposed  of),  as  well
as  at  properties  currently  owned  by  the  Company.  Under  some  environmental  statutes,  such  liability  may  be  without  regard  to
whether  the  Company  was  at  fault,  and  may  also  be  ‘‘joint  and  several,’’  whereby  the  Company  is  responsible  for  all  the  liability
at  issue  even  though  the  Company  (or  the  entity  that  gives  rise  to  the  Company’s  liability)  was  only  one  of  a  number  of  entities
whose  conduct  contributed  to  the  liability.

Environmental   liabilities   may   arise   from   claims   asserted   by   owners   or   occupants   of   affected   properties   or   other   third   parties
affected  by  environmental  conditions  (for  example,  contractors  and  current  or  former  employees)  seeking  to  recover  in  connec-
tion  with  alleged  damages  to  their  property  or  with  personal  injury  or  death,  as  well  as  by  governmental  authorities  seeking  to
remedy  environmental  conditions  or  to  enforce  environmental  obligations.  Environmental  requirements  and  liabilities  could  obli-
gate  the  Company  to  incur  significant  costs,  including  significant  expenses  to  investigate  and  remediate  environmental  contami-
nation,  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

Some  of  the  Company’s  employees  belong  to  labor  unions,  and  strikes  or  work  stoppages  could  adversely  affect  the
Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

The  Company  is  a  party  to  collective  bargaining  agreements  with  various  labor  unions  in  the  United  States,  Mexico,  Australia,
Canada,  and  Bolivia.  In  North  America,  the  Company  is  a  party  to  twenty-nine  contracts  with  national  labor  organizations  which
have  renewal  dates  ranging  to  2005.  The  Company  is  currently  engaged  in  negotiations  with  respect  to  six  of  those  agreements.
In   South   Australia,   ARG   has   one   collective   bargaining   agreement   that   expires   in   September  2004.   ARG   is   close   to   reaching
agreement   on   a   collective   Enterprise   Bargaining   Agreement   covering   the   majority   of   Western   Australian   employees.   The   Com-
pany’s  inability  to  negotiate  acceptable  contracts  with  these  unions  could  result  in,  among  other  things,  strikes,  work  stoppages
or   other   slowdowns   by   the   affected   workers.   If   the   unionized   workers   were   to   engage   in   a   strike,   work   stoppage   or   other
slowdown,  or  other  employees  were  to  become  unionized  or  the  terms  and  conditions  in  future  labor  agreements  were  renegoti-
ated,  the  Company  could  experience  a  significant  disruption  of  its  operations  and/or  higher  ongoing  labor  costs,  which  in  either
case   could   materially   adversely   affect   the   Company’s   operating   results,   financial   condition   and   liquidity.   The   Company   is   also
subject  to  the  risk  of  the  unionization  of  its  non-unionized  employees  which  could  result  in  higher  employee  compensation  and
restrictive  working  condition  demands  that  could  increase  the  Company’s  operating  costs  or  constrain  its  operating  flexibility.  In
addition,  work  interruptions  may  be  threatened  which  could  cause  cessation  of  operations  with  a  corresponding  adverse  financial
impact.

The  Company  may  be  unable  to  employ  a  sufficient  number  of  skilled  workers.

The  Company  believes  that  its  success  depends  upon  its  ability  to  employ  and  retain  skilled  workers  that  posses  the  ability  to
operate  and  maintain  the  Company’s  equipment  and  facilities.  The  operation  and  maintenance  of  the  Company’s  equipment  and
facilities   involve   complex   and   specialized   processes   and   often   must   be   performed   in   harsh   conditions.   In   addition,   the   Com-
pany’s  ability  to  expand  its  operations  depends  in  part  on  its  ability  to  increase  its  skilled  labor  force.  The  demand  for  workers
with  these  types  of  skills  has  recently  become  high,  especially  by  Class I  railroads  that  can  usually  offer  higher  wages  and  better
benefits,  and  the  supply  is  limited.  Moreover,  a  large  portion  of  the  Company’s  current  skilled  workers  will  become  retirement
eligible  over  the  next  few  years.  A  significant  increase  in  the  wages  paid  by  competing  employers  could  result  in  a  reduction  of
the  Company’s  skilled  labor  force,  increases  in  the  wage  rates  that  the  Company  must  pay  or  both.  If  either  of  these  events  were
to   occur,   the   Company’s   cost   structure   could   increase,   the   Company’s   margins   could   decrease   and   the   Company’s   growth
potential  could  be  impaired,  each  of  which  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial
condition  and  liquidity.

The  Company  may  face  liability  for  casualty  losses  which  is  not  covered  by  insurance.

The  Company  has  obtained  for  each  of  its  railroads  insurance  coverage  for  losses  arising  from  personal  injury  and  for  property
damage   in   the   event   of   derailments   or   other   accidents   or   occurrences.   Unexpected   or   catastrophic   circumstances   such   as
accidents   involving   passenger   trains   or   spillage   of   hazardous   materials   could   cause   the   Company’s   liability   to   exceed   its
insurance  limits.  Insurance  is  available  from  only  a  very  limited  number  of  insurers  and  the  Company may  not  be  able  to  obtain
insurance   protection   at   its   current   levels or   obtain   it   on   terms   acceptable   to   the   Company.   In   addition,   subsequent adverse
events  directly  and  indirectly  applicable  to  the  Company  may  result  in  additional  increases  in  the  Company’s  insurance  premiums
and/or   its   self   insured   retentions   and   could   result   in   limitations   to   the   coverage   under   its   existing   policies.   The   occurrence   of
losses  or  other  liabilities  which  are  not  covered  by  insurance  or  which  exceed  the  Company’s  insurance  limits  could  materially
adversely  affect  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

3 7

Rising  fuel  costs  could  materially  adversely  affect  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

Fuel  costs  constitute  a  significant  portion  of  the  Company’s  total  operating  expenses.  Fuel  costs  were  approximately  8.8%  of  the
Company’s  operating  expenses  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003  and  7.5%  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2002.  Fuel
costs   were   approximately   9.1%   of   ARG’s   operating   expenses   for   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003   and   8.3%   for   the   year
ended   December  31,   2002.   Fuel   prices   and   supplies   are   influenced   significantly   by factors   beyond   the   Company’s   and   ARG’s
control,  such  as  international  political  and  economic  circumstances.  If  diesel  fuel  prices  increase  dramatically  or  if  a  fuel  supply
shortage  were  to  arise  from  production  curtailments,  a  disruption  of  oil  imports  or  otherwise,  these  events  could  have  a  material
adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  and  ARG’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

The  loss  of  important  customers  or  contracts  may  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condi-
tion  and  liquidity.

In   North   America,   the   ten   largest   customers   accounted   for   approximately   27%,   27%   and   28%   of   the   Company’s   operating
revenues   in   2003,   2002   and   2001,   respectively.   In   2003,   2002   and   2001,   the   Company’s   largest   customer   was   a   coal-fired
electricity   generating   plant   which   accounted   for   approximately   5%,   5%   and   7%   respectively,   of   the   Company’s   operating
revenues.  ARG’s  ten  largest  customers  accounted  for  approximately  70%,  69%  and  67%  of  its  operating  revenues  in  2003,  2002
and  2001,  respectively.  In  2003,  2002  and  2001,  ARG’s  largest  customer  was  AWB  Limited  which  accounted  for  approximately
20%,   22%   and   22%   respectively,   of   ARG’s   operating   revenues.   The   loss   of   one   or   more   of   the   Company’s   or   ARG’s   largest
customers  or  the  loss  or  material  modification  of  one  or  more  key  contracts  with  such  customers  could  have  a  material  adverse
effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

The  Company’s  results  of  operations  are  susceptible  to  downturns  in  the  general  economy  as  well  as  to  severe
weather  conditions.

In  any  given  year,  the  Company,  like  other  railroads,  is  susceptible  to  changes  in  the  economic  conditions  of  the  industries  and
geographic  areas  that  produce  and  consume  the  freight  the  Company  transports.  In  addition,  many  of  the  goods  and  commodi-
ties   carried   by   the   Company   experience   cyclicality   in   their   demand.   The   Company’s   results   of   operations   can   be   expected   to
reflect   this   cyclicality   because   of   the   significant   fixed   costs   inherent   in   railroad   operations.   Should   an   economic   slowdown   or
recession  occur  in  North  America  or  in  the  other  countries  in  which  the  Company  operates,  the  volume  of  rail  shipments  carried
by  the  Company  is  likely  to  be  affected.

In  addition  to  the  inherent  risks  of  the  business  cycle,  the  Company  is  occasionally  susceptible  to  adverse  weather  conditions.
For  example:

(cid:2) ARG’s   grain   revenue   may   be   reduced   by   drought   (drought   conditions   during   the   2002   growing   season   resulted   in   a

significant  reduction  in  ARG’s  grain  shipments  in  2003);

(cid:2) the  Company’s  coal  revenue  may  be  reduced  by  cold  summers  and  warm  winters,  which  lessen  electricity  demand;  and

(cid:2) the  Company’s  minerals  and  stone  revenue,  which  includes  salt,  may  be  reduced  by  snow-free  and  ice-free  winters  in  the

Northeastern  United  States,  which  lessens  demand  for  road  salt.

Bad  weather  and  natural  disasters,  such  as  blizzards  in  eastern  Canada  and  the  Northeastern  United  States  and  hurricanes  in
Mexico,  could  also  cause  a  shutdown  or  substantial  disruption  of  operations  which,  in  turn,  could  have  a  material  adverse  effect
on   the   Company’s   operating   results,   financial   condition   and   liquidity.   Material   adverse   weather   may   not   directly   affect   the
Company’s  operations  but  rather  the  operations  of  its  customers  or  connecting  carriers.  Such  weather  conditions  could  reduce
or   suspend   their   operations,   which   could have   a   material adverse effect   on   the   Company’s   results,   financial   conditions   and
liquidity.  Furthermore,  the  Company’s  expenses  could  be  adversely  impacted  by  weather,  including  as  a  result  of  higher  track
maintenance   and   overtime   costs   in   the   winter   in the   Company’s New   York-Pennsylvania   and   Canada   Regions as   well   as   by
possible  track  washouts  in  Mexico  during  the  rainy  season.

The  development  of  some  of  the  Company’s  business  could  be  hindered  if  it  fails  to  maintain  satisfactory  working
relationships  with  partners.

Some  of  the  Company’s  operations  are  conducted  through  joint  ventures,  in  which  the  Company  owns  a  significant,  but  less  than
a  controlling,  ownership  interest.  In  particular,  the  Company  owns  a  50%  interest  in  ARG  and  a  22.89%  interest  in  its  Bolivian
operations.  In  these  operations,  the  Company  does  not  have  absolute  control  over  the  operations  of  the  venture.  The  particular
corporate  governance  provisions  affecting  the  Company’s  interests  vary  from  venture  to  venture,  but  in  general,  the  Company
must  obtain  the  cooperation  of  its  partners  in  order  to  implement  and  expand  upon  its  business  strategies.  Any  failure  to  maintain
satisfactory  working  relationships  with  these  partners  or  the  need  to  expend  significant  management  resources  and  time  to  align
the  Company’s  interests  with  the  interests  of  these  partners  could  result  in  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating
results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

3 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

-ADDITIONAL  RISKS  ASSOCIATED  WITH  THE  COMPANY’S  FOREIGN  OPERATIONS

The  Company  is  subject  to  the  risks  of  doing  business  in  foreign  countries.

Some  of  the  Company’s  significant  subsidiaries  transact  business  in  foreign  countries,  namely  in  Canada  and  Mexico,  and the
Company  has equity  investments  in Australia  and Bolivia.  In  addition,  the  Company  may  consider  acquisitions  in  other  foreign
countries  in  the  future.  The  risks  of  doing  business  in  foreign  countries  include:

(cid:2) adverse renegotiation  or  modification  of  existing  agreements  or  arrangements  with  governmental  authorities,

(cid:2) adverse changes  or  greater  volatility  in  the  economies  of  those  countries,

(cid:2) adverse effects  of  currency  exchange  controls,

(cid:2) adverse changes  to  the  regulatory  environment  of  those  countries,

(cid:2) adverse changes  to  the  tax  laws  and  regulations  of  those  countries,

(cid:2) restrictions  on  the  withdrawal  of  foreign  investment  and  earnings,

(cid:2) the  nationalization  of  the  businesses  that  the  Company  operates,

(cid:2) the  actual  or  perceived  failure  by  the  Company  to  fulfill  commitments  under  concession  agreements,

(cid:2) the  potential  instability  of  foreign  governments,  including  from  domestic  insurgency,  and

(cid:2) the  challenge  of  managing  a  culturally  and  geographically  diverse  operation.

Because  some  of  the  Company’s  significant  subsidiaries  transact  business  in  foreign  currencies,  and  because  a
significant  portion  of  the  Company’s  net  income  comes  from  the  operations  of  its  foreign  subsidiaries,  future  ex-
change  rate  fluctuations  may  adversely  affect  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity  and
may  affect  the  comparability  of  the  Company’s  results  between  financial  periods.

The  Company’s  operations  in Mexico  and  Canada  accounted  for  12.9%  and  15.3%  of  consolidated  revenues  and  ARG  account-
ing  for  36.1%  of  consolidated  net  income  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2003.  The  results  of  operations  of  the  Company’s
foreign  operations  are  reported  in  the  local  currency — the  Australian  dollar,  the  Canadian  dollar  and  the  Mexican  peso — and
then   translated   into   U.S.   dollars   at   the   applicable   exchange   rates   for   inclusion   in   the   Company’s consolidated financial   state-
ments.   The   functional   currency   of   the   Company’s   Bolivian   operations   is   the   U.S.   dollar.   The   exchange   rates   between   these
currencies  and  the  U.S.  dollar  have  fluctuated  significantly  in  recent  years  and  may  continue  to  do  so  in  the  future.  In  addition,
because  the  Company’s  financial  statements  are  stated  in  U.S.  dollars, such  fluctuations  may  affect  the  Company’s  results  of
operations  and  financial  position  and  may  affect  the  comparability  of  the  Company’s  results  between  financial  periods.

The  Company may  not  be  able  to  effectively  manage  its  exchange  rate risks and  the  volatility  in  currency  exchange  rates may
have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

Failure  to  meet  concession  commitments  with  respect  to  operations  of  the  Company’s  rail  lines  could  result  in  the
loss  of  the  Company’s  investment  and  a  related  loss  of  revenues.

The  Company  has  entered  into  long-term  concession  and/or  lease  agreements  with  governmental  authorities  in  Mexico,  Bolivia,
South  Australia  and  Western  Australia.  These  concession  and  lease  agreements  are  subject  to  a  number  of  conditions,  including
those   relating   to   the   maintenance   of   certain   standards   with   respect   to   safety,   service,   price   and   the   environment.   These
concession  and  lease  agreements  also  typically  carry  with  them  a  commitment  to  maintain  the  condition  of  the  railroad  and  to
make  a  certain  level  of  capital  expenditures.  The  Company’s  failure  to  meet  these  commitments  under  the  long-term  concession
and   lease   agreements   could   result   in   the   loss   of   those   concession   or   lease   agreements.   The   loss   of   any   concession   or   lease
agreement  could  result  in  the  loss  of  the  Company’s  entire  investment  relating  to  that  concession  or  lease  agreement  and  the
related  revenues  and  income.

Australia’s  open  access  regime  could  lead  to  additional  competition  for  ARG’s  business  and  decreased  revenues  and
profit  margins.

Australia’s   open   access   regime   could   lead   to   additional   competition   for   ARG’s   business,   which   could   result   in   decreased
revenues  and  profit  margins.  The  legislative  and  regulatory  framework  in  Australia  allows  third  party  rail  operators  to  gain  access
to   ARG’s   railway   infrastructure,   and   in   turn   governs   ARG’s   access   to   track   owned   by   others.   ARG   currently   operates   on   the
Commonwealth-owned  interstate  network  from  Sydney,  New  South  Wales  and  Melbourne,  Victoria  to  Kalgoorlie,  Western  Austra-
lia  and  on  State-owned  track  in  New  South  Wales.  Access  charges  are  paid  for  access  onto  the  track  of  other  companies,  and
access  charges  under  state  and  federal  regimes  continue  to  evolve  because  privatization  of  railways  in  Australia  is  recent.  Where
ARG  pays  access  fees  to  others,  if  those  fees  are  increased,  ARG’s  operating  margins  could  be  negatively  affected.  In  addition,  if
the  federal  government  or  respective  state  regulators  were  to  alter  a  regulatory  regime  or  determine  that  access  fees  charged  to
current  or  prospective  third  party  rail  freight  operators  by  ARG  in  Western  Australia  or  South  Australia  do  not  meet  competitiv e
standards,  then  ARG’s  income  from  those  fees  could  be  negatively  affected.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

3 9

When   ARG   operates   over   track   networks   owned   by   others,   including   Commonwealth-owned   and   State-owned   networks,   the
owners  of  the  network  rather  than  the  operators  are  responsible  for  scheduling  the  use  of  the  tracks  as  well  as  for  determining
the  amount  and  timing  of  the  expenditures  necessary  to  maintain  the  network  in  satisfactory  condition.  Therefore,  in  areas  where
ARG  operates  over  tracks  owned  by  others,  it  is  subject  to  train  scheduling  set  by  the  owners  as  well  as  the  risk  that  the  network
is  not  adequately  maintained.  Either  risk  could  affect  ARG’s operating  results,  financial  condition  and  liquidity.

ARG  may  be  adversely  affected  by  unfavorable  conditions  in  the  Australian  agricultural  industry  because  a  substantial
portion  of  ARG’s  railroad  traffic  consists  of  agricultural  commodities.

ARG  derives  a  significant  portion  of  its  rail  freight  revenues  from  shipments  of  grain.  For  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,
2002  and  2001,  grain  shipments  in  South  Australia  and  Western  Australia  generated  approximately  24.5%,  25.4%  and  26.4%,
respectively,   of   ARG’s   operating   revenues.   A   decrease   in   grain   shipments   as   a   result   of   adverse   weather   or   other   negative
agricultural   conditions   could   have   a   material adverse effect   on   ARG’s   operating   results,   financial   condition   and   liquidity.   For
example,   drought   conditions   during   the   2002   growing   season   resulted   in   a   significant   reduction   in   ARG’s   grain   shipments   in
2003.

ARG  may  be  subject  to  significant  additional  expenditures  in  order  to  comply  with  Commonwealth  and/or  state
regulations.

In  addition  to  the  open  access  requirements  described  above,  other  aspects  of  rail  operation  are  regulated,  safety  in  particular,
on  both  a  Commonwealth  and  a  state-by-state  basis.  ARG  has  received  safety  regulatory  approval  to  operate  on  Commonwealth-
owned  track,  in  the  Northern  Territory  and  in  all  states  except  Queensland  and  Tasmania.  Changes  in  safety  regulations  or  other
regulations  or  the  imposition  of  new  regulations  or  conflicts  among  state  and/or  Commonwealth  regulations  could  require  ARG  to
make  significant  expenditures  and  to  incur  significant  expenses  in  order  to  comply  with  these  regulations.

Recently  Issued  Accounting  Standards

The   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board   (FASB)  recently   issued   the   following   Statements   of   Financial   Accounting   Standards
(SFAS):

FASB  145 — ‘‘Rescission  of  FASB  Statements  No. 4,  44,  and  64,  Amendment  of  FASB  Statement  No. 13,  and  Technical
Corrections.’’

Under  SFAS  No. 145,  FASB  Statement  No. 4,  Reporting  Gains  and  Losses  from  Extinguishment  of  Debt,  and  an  amendment  of
that  Statement,  and  FASB  Statement  No. 64,  Extinguishments  of  Debt  Made  to  Satisfy  Sinking-Fund  Requirements  are  rescinded.
This  Statement  also  rescinds  FASB  Statement  No. 44,  Accounting  for  Intangible  Assets  of  Motor  Carriers.  This  Statement  amends
FASB   Statement   No.   13,   Accounting   for   Leases,   to   eliminate   an   inconsistency   between   the   required   accounting   for   sale-
leaseback  transactions  and  the  required  accounting  for  certain  lease  modifications  that  have  economic  effects  that  are  similar  to
sale-leaseback  transactions.  This  Statement  also  amends  other  existing  authoritative  pronouncements  to  make  various  technical
corrections,  clarify  meanings,  or  describe  their  applicability  under  changed  conditions.  SFAS  No.  145  was  issued  in  April 2002
and  the  provisions  of  this  Statement  related  to  the  rescission  of  Statement  4  shall  be  effective  for  the  fiscal  years  beginning  after
May 15,  2002.  All  other  provisions  of  this  Statement  shall  be  effective  for  financial  statements  issued  on  or  after  May 15,  2002
with   early   adoption   permitted.   The   most   significant   change   will   impact   the   reporting   of   losses   associated   with   the   write-off   of
deferred   financing   costs   which   are   currently   reported   as   extraordinary.   The   Company   adopted   this   statement   and   adjusted   its
financial  statements.

FASB  146 — ‘‘Accounting  for  Costs  Associated  with  Exit  or  Disposal  Activities’’

Under  SFAS  No. 146,  costs  associated  with  exit  or  disposal  activities  are  required  to  be  recorded  at  their  fair  values  only  once  a
liability   exists.   Under   previous   guidance,   certain   exit   costs   were   accrued   when   management   committed   to   an   exit   plan,   which
may  have  been  before  an  actual  liability  arose.  Liabilities  recognized  prior  to  the  initial  application  of  FAS  146  should  continue  to
be  accounted  for  in  accordance  with  EITF  94-3  or  other  applicable  pre-existing  guidance.  SFAS  No. 146  was  issued  in  June 2002
and   is   effective   for   fiscal   years   beginning   January  1,   2003   (with   earlier   application   encouraged).   The   Company   adopted   this
statement  and  it  had  no  impact  on  the  Company’s  financial  statements.

FASB  149 — ‘‘Amendment  of  Statement  133  on  Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities’’

This   Statement   amends   and   clarifies   financial   accounting   and   reporting   for   derivative   instruments,   including   certain   derivative
instruments  embedded  in  other  contracts  (collectively  referred  to  as  derivatives)  and  for  hedging  activities  under  FASB  Statement
No.  133,   Accounting   for   Derivative   Instruments   and   Hedging   Activities.   In   particular,   this   Statement   (1)  clarifies   under   what
circumstances   a   contract   with   an   initial   net   investment   meets   the   characteristic   of   a   derivative   discussed   in   paragraph   6(b)   of
Statement   133,   (2)  clarifies   when   a   derivative   contains   a   financing   component,   (3)  amends   the   definition   of   an   underlying   to
conform  it  to  language  used  in  FASB  Interpretation  No. 45,  ‘‘Guarantor’s  Accounting  and  Disclosure  Requirements  for  Guaran-
tees,  Including  Indirect  Guarantees  of  Indebtedness  of  Others’’,  and  (4)  amends  certain  other  existing  pronouncements.  These
changes   are   intended   to   result   in   more   consistent   reporting   of   contracts   as   either   derivatives   or   hybrid   instruments.   This
Statement  is  effective  for  contracts  entered  into  or  modified  after  June 30,  2003  and  all  provisions  of  this  Statement  should  be
applied  prospectively.  The  Company  adopted  this  statement  and  it  had  no  impact  on  the  Company’s  financial  statements.

4 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

FASB  150 — ‘‘Accounting  for  Certain  Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics  of  both  Liabilities  and  Equity’’

This   Statement   requires   that   certain   financial   instruments,   which   under   previous   guidance   were   accounted   for   as   equity,   must
now   be   accounted   for   as   liabilities.   The   financial   instruments   affected   include   mandatorily   redeemable   stock,   certain   financial
instruments   that   require   or   may   require   the   issuer   to   buy   back   some   of   its   shares   in   exchange   for   cash   or   other   assets,   and
certain  obligations  that  can  be  settled  with  shares  of  stock.  SFAS  No. 150  is  effective  for  all  financial  instruments  entered  into  or
modified   after   May  31,   2003   and   must   be   applied   to   the   Company’s   existing   financial   instruments   effective   July  1,   2003,   the
beginning   of   the   first   fiscal   period   after   June  15,   2003.   The   Company   adopted   this   statement   and   it   had   no   impact   on   the
Company’s  financial  statements.

Interpretation  No. 45,  Guarantor’s  Accounting  and  Disclosure  Requirements  for  Guarantees,  Including  Indirect  Guar-
antees  of  Indebtedness  to  Others

In   November  2002,   the   FASB   issued   Interpretation   No.  45,   (FIN)  Guarantor’s   Accounting   and   Disclosure   Requirements   for
Guarantees,  Including  Indirect  Guarantees  of  Indebtedness  to  Others,  which  address  the  disclosure  to  be  made  by  a  guarantor  in
its  interim  and  annual  financial  statements  about  its  obligations  under  guarantees.  Fin  45  also  requires  the  guarantor  to  recognize
a  liability  for  the  non-contingent  component  of  the  guarantee,  which  is  the  obligation  to  stand  ready  to  perform  in  the  event  that
specified   triggering   events   or   conditions   occur.   The   recognition   and   measurement   provisions   of   FIN   45   are   effective   for   all
guarantees  entered  into  or  modified  after  December 31,  2002.  The  Company  did  not  enter  into  such  transactions.  Therefore  the
adoption  of  this  standard  did  not  impact  its  consolidated  financial  position,  results  of  operations,  or  disclosure  requirements.

Interpretation  No. 46,  Consolidation  of  Variable  Interest  Entities,  an  interpretation  of  Accounting  Research  Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51.

In  January 2003,  the  FASB  issued  FIN  46,  Consolidation  of  Variable  Interest  Entities,  an  interpretation  of  Accounting  Research
Bulletin   (ARB)  No.   51.   FIN   46   addresses   consolidation   by   business   enterprises   of   variable   interest   entities   created   after   Janu-
ary  31,   2003   and   to   variable   interest   entities   in   which   an   enterprise   obtains   an   interest   after   that   date.   It   applies   in   the   first
reporting   period   after   December  15,   2003,   to   variable   interest   entities   in   which   an   enterprise   holds   a   variable   interest   that   it
acquired   before   February  1,   2003.   In   December  2003,   the   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board,   issued   revisions   to   FASB
Interpretation  46,  resulting  in  multiple  effective  dates  based  on  the  characteristics  as  well  as  the  creation  dates  of  the  variable
interest  entities,  however  with  no  effective  date  later  than  the  Company’s  first  quarter  of  2004.  The  Company  does  not  believe
that  adoption  of  this  statement  will  have  a  material  effect  on  its  consolidated  financial  statements.

Forward-Looking  Statements

This   discussion   and   analysis   contains   forward-looking   statements   within   the   meaning   of   Section  27A   of   the   Securities   Act   of
1933,  as  amended,  and  Section 21E  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  regarding  future  events  and  future
performance  of  Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  Words  such  as  ‘‘anticipates,’’  ‘‘intends,’’  ‘‘plans,’’  ‘‘believes,’’  ‘‘seeks,’’  ‘‘estimates,’’
‘‘expects,’’ variations  of  these  words  and  similar  expressions  are  intended  to  identify  these  forward-looking  statements.  These
statements   are   not   guarantees   of   future   performance   and   are   subject   to   certain   risks,   uncertainties   and   assumptions   that   are
difficult   to   forecast.   Actual   results   may   differ   materially   from   those   expressed   or   forecast   in   these   forward-looking   statements.
These  risks  and  uncertainties  include  those  noted  above  under  the  caption  ‘‘Risk  Factors’’,  as  well  as  those  noted  in  documents
that  the  Company  files  from  time  to  time  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  such  as  Forms  10-K  and  10-Q  which
contain   additional   important   factors   that   could   cause   actual   results   to   differ   from   current   expectations   and   from   the   forward-
looking  statements  contained  in  this  discussion  and  analysis.

Item  7a. Quantitative  and  Qualitative  Disclosures  about  Market  Risk

The   Company   actively   monitors   its   exposure   to   interest   rate   and   foreign   currency   exchange   rate   risks   and   uses   derivative
financial   instruments   to   manage   the   impact   of   certain   of   these   risks.   The   Company   uses   derivatives   only   for   purposes   of
managing   risk   associated   with   underlying   exposures.   The   Company   does   not   trade   or   use   instruments   with   the   objective   of
earning  financial  gains  on  the  interest  rate  or  exchange  rate  fluctuations  alone,  nor  does  it  use  instruments  where  there  are  not
underlying   cash   exposures.   Complex   instruments   involving   leverage   or   multipliers   are   not   used.   The   Company   manages   its
hedging  positions  and  monitors  the  credit  ratings  of  counterparties  and  does  not  anticipate  losses  due  to  counterparty  nonper-
formance.  Management  believes  that  its  use  of  derivative  instruments  to  manage  risk  is  in  the  Company’s  best  interest.  However,
the  Company’s  use  of  derivative  financial  instruments  may  result  in  short-term  gains  or  losses  and  increased  earnings  volatility.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

4 1

Interest  Rate  Risk

The   Company’s   interest   rate   risk   results   from   issuing   variable   rate   debt   obligations,   since   an   increase   in   interest   rates   would
result  in  lower  earnings  and  increased  cash  outflows.  The  table  below  provides  amounts  outstanding  and  corresponding  interest
rates  for  the  Company’s  fixed  and  variable  rate  debt  and  its  use  of  interest  rate  swaps  to  mitigate  increases  in  interest  rates.

Principal  Amount  of  Long-Term  Debt  and  Interest  Rate  Swaps
(dollars  in  thousands)

Fixed Rate Debt

Average Fixed Interest Rate

Variable Rate Debt Swapped to Fixed Rate Debt(1)

Average Fixed Interest Rate

Unswapped Variable Rate Debt

Average Variable Interest Rate

Total Long-Term Debt

Average Interest Rate

Dec. 31, 2003

$

1,814

3.5%

$ 60,576

6.8%

$ 89,043

3.4%

$151,433

4.7%

(1) Future amounts of variable rate debt that the Company has swapped to fixed rate debt are as follows (as of year ending December 31): $58.4

million in 2004; $54.1 million in 2005; $34.3 million in 2006.

Table  Assumptions

Variable  Interest  Rates:  The  table  presents  variable  interest  rates  based  on  U.S.  and  Canadian  LIBOR  rates  (as  of  December 31,
2003)  plus  an  average  borrowing  margin  of  approximately  2.2%.  The  borrowing  margin  is  composed  of  a  weighted  average  of
2.0%  for  debt  under  the  Company’s  U.S.  and  Canadian  credit  facilities  and  3.5%  for  debt  related  to  its  Mexican  operations.

Interest   Rate   Swaps:   The   table   presents   dollar   amounts   outstanding   under   interest   rate   swaps   as   of   December  31,   2003,   in
which  the  Company  has  swapped  a  portion  of  its  variable  rate  debt  to  fixed  rate  debt.  The  table  also  presents  the  average  fixed
interest  rate  under  these  swaps  which  is  equal  to  the  Company’s fixed  pay  rates  to  counterparties  plus  the  Company’s  borrowing
margin.

Interest  Rate  Sensitivity

Based  on  the  table  above,  assuming  a  one  percentage  point  increase  in  market  interest  rates,  annual  interest  expense  on  the
Company’s  variable  rate  debt  would  increase  by  approximately  $890,000.

Foreign  Currency  Risk

The  functional  currency  of  the  Company’s  Mexican  operations  is  the  Mexican  Peso,  while  the  debt  obligations  are  denominated  in
U.S.  Dollars.  As  a  result,  the  Company  faces  exchange  rate  risk  if  the  Mexican  Peso  were  to  depreciate  relative  to  the  U.S.  Dollar,
thereby  generating  lower  U.S.  Dollar  equivalent  cash  and  earnings  to  pay  the  principal  and  interest  on  the  debt.  As  shown  in  the
tables  below,  the  Company’s  risk  management  policy  seeks  to  mitigate  this  risk  by  purchasing  one-year  forward  currency  options
on  the  U.S.  Dollar  –  Mexican  Peso  exchange  rate  that  approximate  expected  U.S.  Dollar  principal  and  interest  payments,  so  as  to
lessen  the  impact  of  a  severe  Peso  depreciation.

Debt  related  to  the  Company’s  Canadian  and  Australian  operations  is  denominated  in  the  respective  local  currencies.  Therefore,
foreign  currency  risk  related  to  debt  service  payments  does  not  exist  at  the  Company’s  Canadian  and  Australian  operations.

U.S.  Dollar  Denominated  Principal  and  Projected  Interest  Obligations
of  Mexican  Peso  Denominated  Operations
(dollars  in  thousands)

Principal Payments(1)

Interest Payments(2)

Total Principal and Interest

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

There
after

Total

$4,332

$4,332

$4,332

$4,332

$4,332

$1,503

$23,163

990

785

581

377

173

$5,322

$5,117

$4,913

$4,709

$4,505

(1) Principal and interest payments are due on March 15 and September 15 of each year.

(2) Based on 6-month U.S. LIBOR as of December 31, 2003 plus a borrowing margin of 3.5%.

4 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Foreign  Currency  Options
(dollars  in  thousands,  except  exchange  rates)

Settlement Date

Receive US$/Pay Mexican Pesos:

Notional amount

Average exchange rate in

Mexican Pesos per U.S. Dollar

March 15, 2004

Sept. 15, 2004

Total

$2,700

$2,600

$5,300

12.91

12.61

—

Sensitivity  of  Foreign  Currency  to  Debt  Service  Payments

As   shown   in   the   tables   above,   the   Company   expects   its   Mexican   operations   to   fund   approximately   $5.3  million   in   U.S.   dollar
denominated  principal  and  interest  payments  in  2004.  If  the  value  of  the  Mexican  Peso  were  to  weaken  ten  percentage  points
relative   to   the   U.S.   Dollar   while   Mexican   Peso   denominated   earnings   and   cash   flows   remained   constant,   then   it   would   be
equivalent  to  the  Mexican  operations  supporting  an  additional  $532,000  in  debt  service  payments.  Based  on  an  exchange  rate  of
11.23  Mexican  Pesos  per  U.S.  Dollar  as  of  December 31,  2003,  this  exposure  in  2004  is  capped  at  a  maximum  of  $724,000  by
the  foreign  currency  options  shown  in  the  table.

Diesel  Fuel  Price  Risk

The  Company  is  exposed  to  fluctuations  in  diesel  fuel  prices,  since  an  increase  in  the  price  of  diesel  fuel  would  result  in  lower
earnings   and   cash   outflows.   In   the   year   ended   December  31,   2003,   fuel   costs   represented   8.8%   of   the   Company’s   total
expenses  and  9.1%  of  total  expenses  at  the  Company’s  50%-owned  Australian  operations.  As  of  December 31,  2003,  neither  the
Company  nor  its  50%-owned  Australian  operations  had  entered  into  any  hedging  transactions  to  manage  this  diesel  fuel  risk.

Sensitivity  to  Diesel  Fuel  Prices

As  of  December 31,  2003,  each  one  percentage  point  increase  in  the  price  of  fuel  would  result  in  a  $0.2 million  increase  in  the
Company’s   annual   fuel   expense   and   a   $0.2  million   increase   in   annual   fuel   expense   at   the   Company’s   50%-owned   Australian
operations.

Item  8. Financial  Statements  and  Supplementary  Data

The   financial   statements   and   supplementary   financial   data   required   by   this   item   are   listed   at   Part   IV,   Item  15   and   are   filed
herewith  immediately  following  the  signature  page  hereto.

Item  9. Changes  in  and  Disagreements  With  Accountants  on  Accounting  And  Financial  Disclosure

None

Item  9a. Controls  and  Procedures

The  Company  maintains  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  that  are  designed  to  ensure  that  information  required  to  be  disclosed
in  the  Company’s  report  under  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  is  recorded,  processed,  summarized  and  reported  within  the
time  periods  specified  in  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission’s  rules  and  forms,  and  that  such  information  is  accumulated
and  communicated  to  the  Company’s  management,  including  its  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chief  Financial  Officer,  as  appropri-
ate,   to   allow   timely   decisions   regarding   required   disclosures.   Any   controls   and   procedures,   no   matter   how   well   designed   and
operated,  can  provide  only  reasonable  assurance  of  achieving  the  desired  control  objectives.  The  Company’s  management,  with
the   participation   of   the   Company’s   Chief   Executive   Officer   and   Chief   Financial   Officer,   has   evaluated   the   effectiveness   of   the
design   and   operation   of   the   Company’s   disclosure   controls   and   procedures   as   of   December  31,   2003.   Based   upon   that
evaluation   and   subject   to   the   foregoing,   the   Company’s   Chief   Executive   Officer   and   Chief   Financial   Officer   concluded   that   the
design  and  operation  of  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  provided  reasonable  assurance  that  the  disclosure
controls  and  procedures  are  effective  to  accomplish  their  objectives.

There   have   been   no   significant   changes   in   the   Company’s   internal   control   over   financial   reporting   that   occurred   during   the
quarter   ended   December  31,   2003   that   have   materially   affected,   or   are   reasonably   likely   to   materially   affect,   the Company’s
internal  control  over  financial  reporting.

Item  10. Directors  and  Executive  Officers  of  the  Registrant

PART III

The   information   required   by   this   Item   is   incorporated   herein   by   reference   to   the   Company’s   proxy   statement   to   be   issued   in
connection   with   the   Annual   Meeting   of   the   Stockholders   of   the   Company   to   be   held   on   May  12,   2004   under   ‘‘Election   of
Directors’’  and  ‘‘Executive  Officers’’,  which  proxy  statement  will  be  filed  within  120 days  after  the  end  of  the  Company’s  fiscal
year.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

4 3

Item  11. Executive  Compensation

The   information   required   by   this   Item   is   incorporated   herein   by   reference   to   the   Company’s   proxy   statement   to   be   issued   in
connection   with   the   Annual   Meeting   of   the   Stockholders   of   the   Company   to   be   held   on   May  12,   2004   under   ‘‘Executive
Compensation’’,  which  proxy  statement  will  be  filed  within  120 days  after  the  end  of  the  Company’s  fiscal  year.

Item  12. Security  Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and  Management  and  Related  Stockholder  Matters.

EQUITY  COMPENSATION  PLAN  INFORMATION

Number of
securities to be
used upon exercise
of outstanding
options
(a)

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
(b)

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)

Plan Category

Equity Compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

Equity Compensation plans not approved by security holders

Total

1,788,456

—

1,788,456

$10.51

—

$10.51

554,299

—

554,299

(1)

Incentive and nonqualified stock option plan for key employees and nonqualified stock option plan for non-employee directors.

The   remaining   information   required   by   this   Item   is   incorporated   herein   by   reference   to   the   Company’s   proxy   statement   to   be
issued  in  connection  with  the  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Stockholders  of  the  Company  to  be  held  on  May 12,  2004  under  ‘‘Security
Ownership  of  Certain  Beneficial  Owners  and  Management,’’  which  proxy  statement  will  be  filed  within  120 days  after  the  end  of
the  Company’s  fiscal  year.

Item  13. Certain  Relationships  and  Related  Transactions

The   information   required   by   this   Item   is   incorporated   herein   by   reference   to   the   Company’s   proxy   statement   to   be   issued   in
connection  with  the  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Stockholders  of  the  Company  to  be  held  on  May 12,  2004  under  ‘‘Related  Transac-
tions,’’  which  proxy  statement  will  be  filed  within  120 days  after  the  end  of  the  Company’s  fiscal  year.

Item  14. Principal  Accounting  Fees  and  Services

The   information   required   by   this   Item   is   incorporated   herein   by   reference   to   the   Company’s   proxy   statement   to   be   issued   in
connection  with  the  Annual  Meeting  of  the  Stockholders  of  the  Company  to  be  held  on  May 12,  2004  under  ‘‘Principal  Account-
ing  Fees  and  Services,’’  which  proxy  statement  will  be  filed  within  120 days  after  the  end  of  the  Company’s  fiscal  year.

PART IV

Item  15. Exhibits,  Financial  Statement  Schedules  and  Reports  on  Form  8-K

(A) Documents Filed as Part of This Form  10-K

Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  Financial  Statements:

Report of Independent Auditors

Report of Independent Public Accountants

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Separate  Financial  Statements  of  Subsidiaries  Not  Consolidated  and  50  Percent  Owned:

Australian  Railroad  Group  Pty  Ltd  and  Subsidiaries  Financial  Statements:

Report of Independent Auditors

4 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(B) Reports on Form  8-K

(a) Report  dated  November  18,  2003  reporting  on  Item  5.  Other  Events  and  Regulation  FD  Disclosure.  This  Report  announces  the

establishment of a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan by a senior executive officer.

(b) Report  dated  December  12,  2003  reporting  on  Item  5.  Other  Events  and  Regulation  FD  Disclosure.  This  Report  furnished  the
Company’s press release that announced that on December 9, 2003 the Company’s 50%-owned equity investment, the Australian
Railroad  Group,  received  a  private  binding  ruling  from  the  Australian  Taxation  Office  for  certain  track  assets  acquired  from  the
government of Western Australia.

(c) Report  dated  December  19,  2003  reporting  on  Item  5.  Other  Events  and  Regulation  FD  Disclosure.  This  Report  furnished  the

Company’s press release that announced the Company’s agreement to acquire three short-line railroads.

(C) Exhibits — See Index to Exhibits

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

4 5

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  the  Registrant  has  duly  caused  this  report  to
be  signed  on  its  behalf  by  the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly  authorized.

SIGNATURES

Date March 15, 2004

GENESEE & WYOMING INC.

BY: /s/ MORTIMER B. FULLER, III

Mortimer B. Fuller, III
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  this  report  has  been  signed  by  the  following
persons  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  date  indicated  below.

Signature

Title

/s/ MORTIMER B. FULLER, III

Mortimer B. Fuller, III

Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date

March 15, 2004

Chief Financial Officer

March 15, 2004

Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

March 15, 2004

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

March 15, 2004

/s/

JOHN C. HELLMANN

John C. Hellmann

/s/ ALAN R. HARRIS

Alan R. Harris

/s/ ROBERT W. ANESTIS

Robert W. Anestis

/s/ LOUIS S. FULLER

Louis S. Fuller

/s/ T. MICHAEL LONG

T. Michael Long

/s/ ROBERT M. MELZER

Robert M. Melzer

/s/ PETER O. SCANNELL

Peter O. Scannell

/s/ MARK A. SCUDDER

Mark A. Scudder

/s/ PHILIP J. RINGO

Philip J. Ringo

/s/ M. DOUGLAS YOUNG

M. Douglas Young

4 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

(2) Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession

Not applicable.

(3)

(i) Articles of Incorporation
The Exhibit referenced under 4.1 hereof is incorporated herein by reference.

(ii) By-laws
The By-laws referenced under 4.2 hereof are incorporated herein by reference.

(4)

Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

Restated Certificate of Incorporation is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit I to the Registrant’s Definitive Information
Statement on Schedule 14C filed on February 23, 2004.

By-laws are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 333-3972).

Specimen stock certificate representing shares of Class A Common Stock is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Form of Class B Stockholders’ Agreement dated as of May 20, 1996, among the Registrant, its executive officers and its Class B
stockholders is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Voting Agreement and Stock Purchase Option dated March 21, 1980 among Mortimer B. Fuller, III, Mortimer B. Fuller, Jr. and
Frances A. Fuller, and amendments thereto dated May 7, 1988 and March 29, 1996 are incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 9.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and The 1818 Fund III, L.P. dated October 19, 2000 is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 7, 2000.

Registration Rights Agreement between Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and The 1818 Fund III, L.P. dated December 12, 2000 is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 7, 2000.

Letter Agreement between Genesee & Wyoming Inc., The 1818 Fund III, L.P. and Mortimer B. Fuller, III dated December 12, 2000
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 7, 2000.

Form of Senior Debt Indenture is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit j to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-73026).

4.10

Form of Subordinated Debt Indenture in incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit k to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-73026).

(9)

Voting Trust Agreement
Not applicable.

(10) Material Contracts

The Exhibits referenced under (4.4) through (4.10) hereof are incorporated herein by reference.

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

Promissory Note dated October 7, 1991 of Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. in favor of CSX Transportation, Inc. is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

First Amendment to Promissory Note dated as of March 19, 1999 between Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. and CSX
Transportation, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998. (SEC File No. 0-20847)

Form of Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1
to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Form of Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Form of compensation agreement between the Registrant and each of its executive officers is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Form of Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Agreement dated February 6, 1996 between Illinois & Midland Railroad, Inc. and the United Transportation Union is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.65 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-3972).

Amendment No. 1 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997. (SEC File No. 0-20847)

Amendment No. 1 to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997. (SEC File No. 0-20847)

10.10 Memorandum of Lease between Minister for Transport and Urban Planning a Body Corporate Under the Administrative

Arrangements Act, the Lessor, and Australia Southern Railroad Pty Ltd., the Lessee, dated 7 November 1997 is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997. (SEC File
No. 0-20847)

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

4 7

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

Amendment No. 2. to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998. (SEC File No. 0-20847)

Amendment No. 1. to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998. (SEC File No. 0-20847)

Purchase and Sale Agreement dated August 17, 1999 between the Federal Government of United Mexican States, Compania de
Ferrocarriles Chiapas-Mayab, S.A. de C.V., and Ferrocarriles Nacionales de Mexico is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.

Genesee & Wyoming Deferred Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors is incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to the
Registrant’s 1999 Definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 19, 1999.

Amendment No. 3 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000.

Amendment No. 4 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.

Amendment No. 5 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.

Amendment No 2. to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.

Amendment No. 6 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.

Genesee & Wyoming Australia Pty Ltd Executive Share Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.

Agreement for Sale of Business dated December 16, 2000 among The Hon Murray Criddle MLC, The Western Australian
Government Railways Commission, The Hon Richard Fairfax Court MLA, Westrail Freight Employment Pty Ltd, AWR Holdings WA
Pty Ltd, Australian Western Railroad Pty Ltd, WestNet StandardGauge Pty Ltd, WestNet NarrowGauge Pty Ltd, AWR Lease Co. Pty
Ltd, and Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Report on
Form 8-K dated December 16, 2000.

10.22 Westrail Freight Bidding and Share Subscription Agreement dated October 25, 2000 among Wesfarmers Railroad Holdings Pty Ltd,

Wesfarmers Limited, GWI Holdings Pty Ltd, Genesee & Wyoming Inc., and Genesee & Wyoming Australia Pty Ltd is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2000.

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

10.30

10.31

10.32

Shareholders Agreement, dated December 15, 2000 among Wesfarmers Holdings Pty Ltd, GWI Holdings Pty Ltd, and Australian
Railroad Group Pty Ltd is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated
December 16, 2000.

Rail Freight Corridor Land Use Agreement (NarrowGauge) and Railway Infrastructure Lease dated December 16, 2000 among The
Hon Murray Criddle MLC, The Western Australian Government Railways Commission, The Hon Richard Fairfax Court MLA, WestNet
NarrowGauge Pty Ltd, Australia Western Railroad Pty Ltd, and Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2000.

Rail Freight Corridor Land Use Agreement (StandardGauge) and Railway Infrastructure Lease dated December 16, 2000 among The
Hon Murray Criddle MLC, The Western Australian Government Railways Commission, The Hon Richard Fairfax Court MLA, WestNet
StandardGauge Pty Ltd, Australia Western Railroad Pty Ltd, and Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 16, 2000.

Loan Agreement between GW Servicios, S.A. de C.V., Compania de Ferrocarriles Chiapas-Mayab, S.A. de C.V. and International
Finance Corporation dated December 5, 2000 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

Loan Agreement between GW Servicios, S.A. de C.V., Compania de Ferrocarriles Chiapas-Mayab, S.A. de C.V. and Nederlandse
Financierings-Maatschappij Voor Ontwikkelingsladen N.V. dated December 5, 2000 is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

Subscription Agreement between GW Servicios S.A. de C.V. and International Finance Corporation dated December 5, 2000 is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2000.

Amendment No. 3 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

Amendment No. 4 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 28, 2001 by and between Bethlehem Steel Corporation and Genesee &
Wyoming Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2000.

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 3, 2001 by and among Genesee & Wyoming Inc., ETR Acquisition
Corporation and Emons Transportation Group, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Report on
Form 8-K dated December 3, 2001.

4 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

10.33

10.34

10.35

10.36

10.37

Underwriting Agreement dated as of December 17, 2001 by and among the Registrant, the selling stockholders named therein and
Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, ABN AMRO Rothchild LLC, Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. and
BB&T Capital Markets, a division of Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. as representatives of the underwriters is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated December 17, 2001.

Amendment No. 6 to the Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.

Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Mueller Industries, Inc., Arava Natural Resources Company, Inc. and Genesee &
Wyoming Inc. relating to the purchase and sale of Utah Railway Company, dated as August 19, 2002 is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K dated August 28, 2002.

Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated as of October 1, 2002 among Genesee &
Wyoming Inc., as US Borrower, Quebec Gatineau Railway, Inc., as Canadian Borrower, The Guarantors, The Lending Institutions
listed therein, as Lenders, Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent with Fleet Securities, Inc., as Arranger and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, LaSalle Bank National Association, Sovereign Bank, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Syndication Agents is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002.

*10.38

Employment Agreement dated as of March 4, 2002 by and between Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Robert Grossman.

*10.39

Common Terms Deed dated December 3, 2003 between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower), the companies listed in Part
I of Schedule 1 as original guarantors, the financial institutions listed in Part II of Schedule 1 as original lenders and ANZ Capel
Court Limited (Security Trustee).

† *10.40

Loan Agreement between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
(Lender) dated December 5, 2003.

† *10.41

Loan Agreement between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower) and BNP Paribas (Lender) dated December 5, 2003.

† *10.42

† *10.43

† *10.44

*10.45

*10.46

*10.47

*10.48

Loan Agreement between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower) and Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd. (Lender) dated December
5, 2003.

Loan Agreement between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower) and National Australia Bank Limited (Lender) dated
December 5, 2003.

Loan Agreement between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower) and Sumitomo Mitsui Finance Australia Limited (Lender)
dated December 5, 2003.

Security Trust Deed, as amended December 5, 2003 between Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd (Borrower) and ANZ Capel Court
Limited (Security Trustee).

Floating Charge, as amended December 5, 2003, between the Chargors listed in Schedule 1 (WestNet StandardGauge Pty Ltd and
WestNet NarrowGauge Pty Ltd) and ANZ Capel Court Limited (Chargee).

Deed of Floating Charge, as amended December 5, 2003, between Australia Southern Railroad Pty Limited (Chargor) and ANZ
Capel Court Limited (Security Agent).

ISDA Master Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 between Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and Australian
Railroad Group Pty Ltd.

*10.49

ISDA Master Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 between BNP Paribas and Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd.

*10.50

ISDA Master Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 between National Australia Bank Limited and Australian Railroad Group Pty
Ltd.

*10.51 Multi-Party Agreement among The Hon Murray Criddle MLC, The Western Australian Government Railways Commission, The Hon
Richard Fairfax Court, Treasurer, WestNet StandardGauge Pty Ltd and WestNet NarrowGauge Pty Ltd, Australian Western Railroad
Pty Ltd, Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd, and ANZ Capel Court Limited.

*10.52

Tripartite Deed among the Minister for Transport and Urban Planning (Lessor), Australia Southern Railroad Pty Limited (Lessee) and
ANZ Capel Court Limited (Security Trustee).

*(11.1) Statement re computation of per share earnings

(12) Statements re computation of ratios

Not applicable.

(13) Annual report to security holders, Form 10-Q or quarterly report to security holders

Not applicable.

(16)

(18)

Letter re change in certifying accountant
Not applicable.

Letter re change in accounting principles
Not applicable.

*(21.1) Subsidiaries of the Registrant

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

4 9

(22) Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders

Not applicable.

*(23.1) Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

*(23.2) Consent of Ernst & Young

(24) Power of attorney

Not applicable.

*(31.1) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

*(31.2) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

*(32.1) Section 1350 Certifications

(99) Additional Exhibits

Not applicable.

* Exhibit filed with this Report.

† The Company has requested confidential treatment of certain information contained in this Exhibit. Such information has been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Company’s application for confidential treatment under 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4)
and 240.24b-2.

5 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and Subsidiaries:

Report of Independent Auditors ****************************************************************************************
Report of Independent Public Accountants ******************************************************************************
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 *********************************************************
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 *********************************

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002

and 2001 *********************************************************************************************************
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 *****************************
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements *****************************************************************************

Separate Financial Statements of Subsidiaries Not Consolidated and 50 Percent Owned:

Australian Railroad Group Pty Ltd and Subsidiaries Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Auditors ****************************************************************************************
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 *********************************************************
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 *********************************

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002

and 2001 *********************************************************************************************************
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 *****************************
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements *****************************************************************************

Page

52

53

54

55

56-57

58

59

85

86

87

88

89

90

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

5 1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To  the  Board  of  Directors  and  Stockholders  of
Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.:

In   our   opinion,   based   on   our   audits   and   the   report   of   other   auditors,   the   accompanying   consolidated   balance   sheets   and   the
related   consolidated   statements   of   income,   common   stockholders’   equity   and   comprehensive   income   and   cash   flows   present
fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  position  of  Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as  of  December 31,  2003  and
2002,  and  the  results  of  their  operations  and  their  cash  flows  for  each  of  the  two  years  in  the  period  ended  December 31,  2003  in
conformity   with   accounting   principles   generally   accepted   in   the   United   States   of   America.   These   financial   statements   are   the
responsibility  of  the  Company’s  management;  our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  these  financial  statements  based  on
our  audits.  We  did  not  audit  the  financial  statements  of  Australian  Railroad  Group  Pty.  Ltd.  (ARG),  an  equity  method  investment
which  represents  17.0%  and  13.7%  of  the  Company’s  total  assets  as  of  December 31,  2003  and  2002,  respectively,  and  36.1%
and  33.1%  of  the  Company’s  net  income  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003  and  2002,  respectively.  Those  statements  were
audited  by  other  auditors  whose  report  thereon  has  been  furnished  to  us,  and  our  opinion  expressed  herein,  insofar  as  it  relates
to   the   amounts   included   for   ARG,   is   based   solely   on   the   report   of   the   other   auditors.   We   conducted   our   audits   of   these
statements  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America,  which  require  that  we  plan
and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement.
An   audit   includes   examining,   on   a   test   basis,   evidence   supporting   the   amounts   and   disclosures   in   the   financial   statements,
assessing   the   accounting   principles   used   and   significant   estimates   made   by   management,   and   evaluating   the   overall   financial
statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our  audits  and  the  report  of  other  auditors  provide  a  reasonable  basis  for  our  opinion.
The  financial  statements  of  the  Company  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2001,  prior  to  the  revisions  discussed  in  Notes 6,  18
and  22  were  audited  by  other  independent  accountants  who  have  ceased  operations.  Those  independent  accountants  expressed
an  unqualified  opinion  on  those  financial  statements  in  their  report  dated  February 11,  2002.

As discussed  in  Note 6,  the  Company  changed  the  manner  in  which  it  accounts  for  goodwill  and  other  intangible  assets  upon
adoption  of  the  accounting  guidance  of  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No. 142  on  January 1,  2002.

As   discussed   above,   the   financial   statements   of   the   Company   for   the   year   ended   December  31,   2001,   were   audited   by   other
independent  accountants  who  have  ceased  operations.  As discussed  in  Note  6,  these  financial  statements  have  been  revised  to
include   the   transitional   disclosures   required   by   Statement   of   Financial   Accounting   Standards   No.  142,   ‘‘Goodwill   and   Other
Intangible  Assets’’,  which  was  adopted  by  the  Company  as  of  January 1,  2002.  As  discussed  in  Note  18  and  22  these  financial
statements  have  also  been  revised  to  reflect  a  change  in  the  composition  of  the  Company’s  reportable  segments  and  to  reflect
the   three-for-two   stock   split   which   became   effective   on   March  15,   2004.   We   audited   the   transitional   disclosures   described   in
Note  6.  We  also  audited  the  adjustments  to  the  segment  information  described  in  Note  18  and  the  adjustments  for  the  three-for-
two  stock  split  discussed  in  Note 22  that  were  applied  to  revise  the  2001  financial  statements.  In  our  opinion,  the  transitional
disclosures   for   2001   are   appropriate   and   the   adjustments relating to   the   2001   segment   information   described   in   Note   18   and
relating  to  the  three-for-two  stock  split  described  in  Note  22  are  appropriate  and  have  been  properly  applied.  However,  we  were
not  engaged  to  audit,  review,  or  apply  any  procedures  to  the  2001  financial  statements  of  the  Company  other  than  with  respect
to  such  transitional  disclosures  and  adjustments  and,  accordingly,  we  do  not  express  an  opinion  or  any  other  form  of  assurance
on  the  2001  financial  statements  taken  as  a  whole.

/s /  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
New  York,  New  York
February 13,  2004,  except  as  to  the  stock  split  discussed  in Note 22  as  to  which  the  date  is  March 15,  2004

5 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

The   following   report   is   a   copy   of   a   report   previously   issued   by   Arthur   Andersen   LLP   and   has   not   been   reissued   by   Arthur
Andersen  LLP.  In  2002,  the  Company  adopted  the  provisions  of  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No. 142,  ‘‘Goodwill
and  Other  Intangible  Assets’’  (SFAS  No. 142).  As  discussed  in  Note 6,  the  Company  has  presented  the  transitional  disclosures  for
2001  required  by  SFAS  No. 142.  Additionally  as  discussed  in  Note 18,  the  Company  changed  the  manner  in  which  it  presents  its
segment  information.  Additionally,  the  Company revised  its 2001 financial  statements  for  the three-for-two stock  split  discussed
in  Note 22.  The  Arthur  Andersen  LLP  report  does  not  extend  to  these  changes  to  the  2001  consolidated  financial  statements.
These  adjustments  to  the  2001  consolidated  financial  statements  were  reported  on  by  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP  as  stated  in
their  report  appearing  herein.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To  the  Board  of  Directors  and  the  Shareholders  of
Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.:

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  GENESEE  &  WYOMING  INC.  (a  Delaware  corporation)  AND
SUBSIDIARIES  as  of  December 31,  2001*  and  2000*,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income,  stockholders’  equity
and  comprehensive  income  and  cash  flows  for  each  of  the  three*  years  in  the  period  ended  December 31,  2001.  These  financial
statements  are  the  responsibility  of  the  Company’s  management.  Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  these  financial
statements   based   on   our   audits.   We   did   not   audit   the   financial   statements   of   Australian   Railroad   Group   Pty.   Ltd.   (ARG),   the
investment  in  which  is  reflected  in  the  accompanying  financial  statements  using  the  equity  method  of  accounting.  The  investment
in  ARG  represents  14.8 percent  and  16.1 percent  of  the  Company’s  total  assets  as  of  December 31,  2001  and  2000,  respec-
tively,  and  the  equity  in  its  net  income  represents  44.3 percent  of  the  Company’s  net  income  for  the  year  ended  December 31,
2001.   Additionally,   the   summarized   financial   data   for   ARG   contained   in   Note   7   is   based   on   the   financial   statements   of   ARG,
which  were  audited  by  other  auditors.  Their  report  has  been  furnished  to  us,  and  our  opinion,  insofar  as  it  relates  to  amounts
included   in   the   Company’s   financial   statements   for   ARG,   including   the   data   in   Note   7,   is   based   on   the   report   of   the   other
auditors.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States.  Those  standards  require
that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audits  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.   An   audit   includes   examining,   on   a   test   basis,   evidence   supporting   the   amounts   and   disclosures   in   the   financial
statements.  An  audit  also  includes  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as
well   as   evaluating   the   overall   financial   statement   presentation.   We   believe   that   our   audits   provide   a   reasonable   basis   for   our
opinion.

In  our  opinion,  based  on  our  audits  and  the  report  of  other  auditors,  the  financial  statements  referred  to  above  present  fairly,  in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  position  of  Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  as  of  December 31,  2001  and  2000*,  and
the   results   of   their   operations   and   their   cash   flows   for   each   of   the   three*   years   in   the   period   ended   December  31,   2001,   in
conformity  with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 11, 2002

* Pursuant  to  SEC  rules  and  regulations,  the  Company’s  consolidated  balance  sheets  as  of  December 31,  2001  and  2000  and  the
Company’s  statements  of  income,  stockholders’  equity  and  comprehensive  income  and  cash  flows  for  the  years  ended  Decem-
ber 31,  2000  and  1999  are  not  required  to  be  included  herein.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

5 3

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)

ASSETS

CURRENTS ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable, net

Materials and supplies

Prepaid expenses and other

Deferred income tax assets, net

Total current assets

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

GOODWILL

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net

OTHER ASSETS, net

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Current portion of long-term debt

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Total current liabilities

LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion

DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES, net

DEFERRED ITEMS — grants from governmental agencies

DEFERRED GAIN — sale/leaseback

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

MINORITY INTEREST

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK (3,000,000 shares convertible at $6.81 per share of Class A

Common Stock on or before December 2008)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, one vote per share; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 23,697,287 and

23,138,436 shares issued and 20,167,875 and 19,630,662 shares outstanding (net of 3,529,412 and 3,507,774
shares in treasury) on December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively

Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value, ten votes per share; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 2,707,938 shares

issued and outstanding on December 31, 2003 and 2002

Additional paid-in capital

Retained earnings

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

Less treasury stock, at cost

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

December 31,

2003

2002

$ 11,118

$ 11,028

54,656

54,527

5,204

6,204

3,010

5,468

7,447

2,484

80,192

80,954

315,345

264,728

117,664

24,522

79,357

10,093

81,287

24,174

53,260

10,456

$627,173

$514,859

$

6,589

$

6,116

57,472

13,902

49,482

12,314

77,963

67,912

151,433

119,301

41,840

42,667

3,982

14,843

3,365

—

31,686

42,509

4,448

12,280

3,122

—

23,994

23,980

158

18

154

18

131,978

127,741

130,913

103,465

16,599

(9,493)

(12,580)

(12,264)

267,086

209,621

$627,173

$514,859

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

OPERATING REVENUES

OPERATING EXPENSES:

Transportation

Maintenance of ways and structures

Maintenance of equipment

General and administrative

Net gain on sale and impairment of assets

Depreciation and amortization

Total operating expenses

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS

Interest expense

Gain on sale of 50% equity in Australian operations

Other income, net

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES and EQUITY EARNINGS

Provision for income taxes

Equity in Net Income of International Affiliates:

Australia

South America

NET INCOME

Preferred stock dividends and cost accretion

Years Ended December 31,
2001
2002
2003

$244,827

$209,540

$173,576

84,268

25,969

36,695

46,206

65,553

22,950

36,295

42,306

56,573

19,271

31,231

31,605

(87)

(3,140)

(814)

15,471

13,569

12,756

208,522

177,533

150,622

36,305

(8,646)

32,007

22,954

(8,139)

(10,049)

—

986

28,645

10,567

10,371

270

28,719

1,270

—

726

24,594

8,761

8,487

1,287

25,607

1,172

2,985

497

16,387

6,166

8,451

412

19,084

957

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

$ 27,449

$ 24,435

$ 18,127

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings per common share

Weighted average shares

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings per common share

Weighted average shares and equivalents

$

1.21

$

1.11

$

1.15

22,700

22,056

15,764

$

1.07

$

0.97

$

0.98

26,768

26,378

19,375

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

5 5

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands)

Class A
Common
Stock

Class B
Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Treasury
Stock

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

BALANCE, December 31, 2000

$

104

$ 19

$ 49,642

$ 60,903

$(4,883)

$(11,053)

$ 94,732

Comprehensive income, net of tax:

Net income

Currency translation adjustments

Fair market value adjustments of

cash flow hedges

Comprehensive income

Proceeds from Class A Common
Stock Offering, net of fees

Proceeds from employee

stock purchases

Conversion of Class B Common Stock

to Class A Common Stock

Tax benefit from exercise of

stock options

Accretion of fees on Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock

4% dividend paid on Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock

Treasury stock acquisitions,

124,601 shares

—

—

—

38

8

1

—

—

—

—

BALANCE, December 31, 2001

151

Comprehensive income, net of tax:

Net income

Currency translation adjustments

Fair market value adjustments of

cash flow hedges

Pension liability adjustment

Comprehensive income

Proceeds from employee

stock purchases

Tax benefit from exercise of

stock options

Accretion of fees on Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock

4% dividend paid on Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock

Treasury stock acquisitions,

2,484 shares

—

—

—

3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(1)

—

—

—

—

18

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

66,495

6,254

—

1,206

—

—

—

19,084

—

—

—

—

—

—

(146)

(811)

—

—

708

(730)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

19,084

708

(730)

19,062

66,533

6,262

—

1,206

(146)

(811)

(1,175)

(1,175)

123,597

79,030

(4,905)

(12,228)

185,663

—

—

—

3,086

1,058

—

—

—

25,607

—

—

—

—

(172)

(1,000)

—

—

2,514

(6,550)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(552)

—

—

—

—

25,607

2,514

(6,550)

(552)

21,019

3,089

1,058

(172)

(1,000)

(36)

(36)

BALANCE, December 31, 2002

$

154

$ 18

$127,741

$103,465

$(9,493)

$(12,264)

$209,621

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (continued)
(dollars in thousands)

Class A
Common
Stock

Class B
Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Treasury
Stock

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

BALANCE, December 31, 2002

$

154

$18

$127,741

$103,465

$ (9,493)

$(12,264)

$209,621

Comprehensive income, net of tax:

Net income

Currency translation adjustments

Fair market value adjustments of

cash flow hedges

Pension liability adjustment

Comprehensive income

Proceeds from employee

stock purchases

Tax benefit from exercise of

stock options

Accretion on Redeemable Convertible

Preferred Stock

Adjustment of Preferred Option value

4% dividend paid on Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock

Treasury stock acquisitions,

21,638 shares

—

—

—

—

4

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

2,858

1,123

—

256

—

—

28,719

—

—

—

—

—

(271)

—

(1,000)

—

—

23,498

2,666

(72)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

28,719

23,498

2,666

(72)

54,811

2,862

1,123

(271)

256

(1,000)

(316)

(316)

BALANCE, December 31, 2003

$

158

$18

$131,978

$130,913

$16,599

$(12,580)

$267,086

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

5 7

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities-

Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Net gain on sale and impairment of assets
Write off of deferred finance fees from early extinguishment of debt
Gain on sale of 50% equity in Australian operations
Equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
Minority interest expense
Tax benefit realized upon exercise of stock options
Valuation adjustment of split dollar life insurance
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions-

Accounts receivable
Materials and supplies
Prepaid expenses and other
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Other assets and liabilities, net

Net cash provided by operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchase of property and equipment, net of proceeds from government grants
Locomotive upgrade project
Purchase of Chattahoochee Industrial Railroad, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi Railroad and

Fordyce & Princeton Railroad

Purchase of Utah Railway Company
Purchase of Emons Transportation Group, Inc., net of cash received
Purchase of assets of South Buffalo Railway, net of cash received
Cash investments in unconsolidated affiliates — South America
Cash received from unconsolidated international affiliates
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment

Net cash used in investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on long-term borrowings
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Payment of debt issuance costs
Proceeds from issuance of Class A Common Stock, net
Proceeds from issuance of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock, net
Proceeds from employee stock purchases
Purchase of treasury stock
Dividends paid on Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock

Net cash provided by financing activities

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year

CASH PAID DURING YEAR FOR:

Interest
Income taxes

Years Ended December 31,
2002
2003

2001

$ 28,719

$ 25,607

$ 19,084

15,471
9,659
(87)
—
—
(10,641)
243
1,123
(367)

3,267
325
999
(3,941)
2,147

13,569
6,430
(3,140)
597
—
(9,774)
278
1,058
555

(8,270)
241
(581)
(1,178)
2,176

12,756
4,164
(814)
—
(2,985)
(8,863)
129
1,206
516

3,376
369
2,348
(77)
(2,649)

46,917

27,568

28,560

(18,934)
(4,076)

(20,272)
(2,015)

(54,952)
—
—
—
—
132
1,941

—
(55,680)
(29,449)
—
—
263
4,113

(75,889)

(103,040)

(159,608)
186,500
—
—
—
2,862
(316)
(1,000)

(214,438)
276,081
(4,578)
—
—
3,089
(36)
(1,000)

(16,551)
—

—
—
—
(33,117)
(246)
4,329
8,147

(37,438)

(200,033)
157,000
(287)
66,533
4,812
6,262
(1,175)
(855)

28,438

59,118

32,257

624

90

11,028

(1,350)

1,980

(17,704)

28,732

25,359

3,373

$ 11,118

$ 11,028

$ 28,732

$

8,691
1,034

$

7,825
2,679

$

9,875
835

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BUSINESS  AND  CUSTOMERS:

Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  (the  Company)  has  interests  in  thirty-two  short  line  and  regional  railroads  through  its
various   operating   subsidiaries   and   unconsolidated   affiliates   of   which   twenty-four   are   located   in   the   United   States,   three   are
located  in  Canada,  one  is  located  in  Mexico,  three  are  located  in  Australia,  and  one  is  located  in  Bolivia.  From  January 1,  2001  to
December 31,  2003  the  Company  has  acquired  ten  railroads  and  sold  two  small  railroads  in  the  United  States.  The  Company,
through   its   leasing   subsidiary,   also   leases   and   manages   railroad   transportation   equipment   in   the   United   States,   Canada   and
Mexico.  The  Company,  through  its  industrial  switching  subsidiary,  provides  freight  car  switching  and  ancillary  rail  services.  See
Note  3  for  descriptions  of  the  Company’s  expansion  in  recent  years.

A  large  portion  of  the  Company’s  operating  revenue  is  attributable  to  industrial  customers  operating  in  the  electric  utility,  forest
products,  auto  and  auto  parts  and  cement  industries  in  North  America.  The  largest  ten  customers  accounted  for  approximately
27%,  27%  and  28%  of  the  Company’s  operating  revenues  in  2003,  2002  and  2001,  respectively.  In  2003,  2002  and  2001,  the
Company’s   largest   customer   was   a   coal-fired   electricity   generating   plant   which   accounted   for   approximately   5%,   5%   and   7%
respectively,  of  the  Company’s  operating  revenues.

2. SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES:

Principles  of  Consolidation

The   consolidated   financial   statements   include   the   accounts   of   the   Company   and   its   controlled   subsidiaries.   The   Company’s
investments  in  unconsolidated  affiliates  are  accounted  for  under  the  equity  method.  All  significant  intercompany  transactions  and
accounts  have  been  eliminated  in  consolidation.

Revenue  Recognition

Railroad   revenues   are   estimated   and   recognized   as   shipments   initially   move   onto   the   Company’s   tracks,   which,   due   to   the
relatively   short   length   of   haul,   is   not   materially   different   from   the   recognition   of   revenues   as   shipments   progress.   Industrial
switching  and  other  service  revenues  are  recognized  as  such  services  are  provided.

Cash  Equivalents

The   Company   considers   all   highly   liquid   instruments   with   a   maturity   of   three   months   or   less   when   purchased   to   be   cash
equivalents.

Materials  and  Supplies

Materials  and  supplies  consist  of  purchased  items  for  improvement  and  maintenance  of  road  property  and  equipment,  and  are
stated  at  the  lower  of  average  cost  or  market.

Property  and  Equipment

Property   and   equipment   are   carried   at   historical   cost.   Acquired   railroad   property   is   recorded   at   the   allocated   cost.   Major
renewals  or  betterments  are  capitalized  while  routine  maintenance  and  repairs  are  charged  to  expense  when  incurred.  Gains  or
losses  on  sales  or  other  dispositions  are  credited  or  charged  to  operating  expense.  Depreciation  is  provided  on  the  straight-line
method  over  the  useful  lives  of  the  road  property  (20-50 years)  and  equipment  (3-20 years).

The   Company   continually   evaluates   whether   events   and   circumstances   have   occurred   that   indicate   that   its   long-lived   tangible
assets   may   not   be   recoverable.   When   factors   indicate   that   assets   should   be   evaluated   for   possible   impairment,   the   Company
uses  an  estimate  of  the  related  undiscounted  future  cash  flows  over  the  remaining  lives  of  assets  in  measuring  whether  or  not
impairment  has  occurred.  If  impairment  is  identified,  a  loss  would  be  reported  to  the  extent  that  the  carrying  value  of  the  related
assets  exceeds  the  fair  value  of  those  assets  as  determined  by  valuation  techniques  available  in  the  circumstances.

Grants

Grants  received  from  governmental  agencies  are  recorded  as  long-term  liabilities  when  received  and  are  amortized  as  a  reduction
to   expense   over   the   same   period   which   the   underlying   purchased   assets   are   depreciated.   In   addition   to   government   grants,
customers  occasionally  provide  fixed  funding  of  certain  track  rehabilitation  or  construction  projects  to  facilitate  the  Company’s
service  over  that  track.

Goodwill  and  Intangible  Asset  Impairment

The  Company  adopted  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards  No. 142  (SFAS  No. 142)  as  of  January 1,  2002.  Under  this
pronouncement,   a   two-step   goodwill   impairment   model   is   used.   Step   1   compares   the   fair   value   of   the   reporting   unit   with   its

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

5 9

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

carrying   amount,   including   goodwill.   If   the   fair   value   of   the   reporting   unit   is   less   than   the   carrying   amount,   goodwill   would   be
considered  impaired  and  Step  2  measures  the  goodwill  impairment  as  the  excess  of  recorded  goodwill  over  its  implied  fair  value.
The  Company  tests  impairment  on  an  annual  basis  or  when  specific  triggering  events  occur.

Amortizable  Intangible  Assets

The   Company   has   two   amortizable   intangible   assets   in   the   United   States   related   to   customer   service   agreements   and   one
amortizable  intangible  asset  in  Mexico  related  to  a  concession  agreement  with  the  Mexican  Communications  and  Transportation
Department.  The  two  intangible  assets  in  the  U.S.  are  amortized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  estimated  lives  of  the  respective
customer  facilities  they  serve.  The  intangible  asset  in  Mexico  is  amortized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  the  life  of  the  concession
agreement.  See  Notes  6  and  16  for  more  detailed  discussion  of  amortizable  intangible  assets.

Insurance

The   Company   maintains   insurance,   with   varying   deductibles   up   to   $500,000   per   incident   for   liability   and   up   to   $500,000   per
incident  for  property  damage,  for  claims  resulting  from  train  derailments  and  other  accidents  related  to  its  operations.  Addition-
ally,   the   Company   is   self-insured   for   general   employee   health   and   medical   claims   up   to   a   stop-loss   of   $75,000   per   insured
individual.  Accruals  for  claims,  limited  when  appropriate  to  the  applicable  deductible,  are  estimated  and  recorded  in  the  period
when  such  claims  are  incurred.

Common  Stock  Splits

On  February 14,  2002  and  May 1,  2001  the  Company  announced  three-for-two  common  stock  splits  in  the  form  of  50%  stock
dividends   to   be   distributed   on   March  14,   2002   to   stockholders   of   record   as   of   February  28,   2002,   and   on   June   15,   2001   to
stockholders  of  record  as  of  May 31,  2001,  respectively.  All  share,  per  share  and  par  value  amounts  presented  herein  have  been
restated   to   reflect   the   retroactive   effect   of   these   stock   splits.   See   Note   22   regarding   a   subsequent   stock   split   announced   on
February 11,  2004.

Earnings  per  Share

Common   shares   issuable   under   unexercised   stock   options,   calculated   under   the   treasury   stock   method,   and   mandatorily   re-
deemable   convertible   preferred   stock   (see   Note   12)   are   the   only   reconciling   items   between   the   Company’s   basic   and   diluted
weighted   average   shares   outstanding.   The   total   number   of   options   used   to   calculate   weighted   average   share   equivalents   for
diluted  earnings  per  share  is  1,788,456,  1,401,432  and  1,934,739  for  2003,  2002  and  2001,  respectively.  Options  to  purchase
488,881   additional   shares   of   stock   were   outstanding   as   of   December  31,   2002,   but   were   not   included   in   the   computation   of
diluted   earnings   per   share   because   the   options’   exercise   prices   were   greater   than   the   average   market   price   of   the   common
shares.   Also   included   in   the   diluted   earnings   per   share   calculation   in   2003,   2002   and   2001   are   3,668,478   shares,   3,668,478
shares  and  2,974,986  shares,  respectively,  of  common  stock  equivalents  which  represent  the  weighted  average  share  impact  of
the  assumed  conversion  of  the  mandatorily  redeemable  convertible  preferred  stock.

Income  Taxes

The  Company  files  consolidated  U.S.  federal  income  tax  returns  which  include  all  of  its  U.S.  subsidiaries.  Each  of  the  Company’s
foreign  subsidiaries  files  appropriate  income  tax  returns  in  their  respective  countries.  No  provision  is  made  for  the  U.S.  income
taxes  applicable  to  the  undistributed  earnings  of  controlled  foreign  subsidiaries  as  it  is  the  intention  of  management  to  fully  utilize
those  earnings  in  the  operations  of  the  foreign  subsidiaries.

Pension  and  Other  Postretirement  Benefit  Plans

The  Company  administers  two  noncontributory  defined  benefit  plans  for  union  and  non-union  employees  of  two  U.S.  subsidiaries.
Benefits   are   determined   based   on   a   fixed   amount   per   year   of   credited   service.   The   Company’s   funding   policy   is   to   make
contributions  for  pension  benefits  based  on  actuarial  computations  which  reflect  the  long-term  nature  of  the  plans.  The  Company
provides   health   care   and   life   insurance   benefits   for   certain   retired   employees   including   union   employees   of   one   of   its   U.S.
subsidiaries  and  certain  nonunion  employees  who  have  reached  the  age  of  55  with  30  or  more  years  of  service.  The  Company
funds  the  plans  on  a  pay-as-you-go  basis.

6 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The  following  table  sets  forth  the  computation  of  basic  and  diluted  earnings  per  share  for  the  years  ended  December  31,  2003,
2002  and  2001  (in  thousands,  except  per  share  amounts):

Numerators:

Net income (used in diluted EPS)

Dividends and fees on Preferred Stock

Net income available to common stockholders (used in basic EPS)

Denominators:

Basic — weighted average common shares outstanding

Dilutive effect of employee stock options

Dilutive effect of Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock

2003

2002

2001

$28,719

$25,607

$19,084

(1,270)

(1,172)

(957)

$27,449

$24,435

$18,127

22,700

22,056

15,764

400

654

636

3,668

3,668

2,975

Diluted — weighted average common shares and share equivalents outstanding

26,768

26,378

19,375

Income per common share:

Basic

Diluted

Stock-based  Compensation  Plans

$ 1.21

$ 1.11

$ 1.15

$ 1.07

$ 0.97

$ 0.98

In  1996,  the  Company  established  an  incentive  and  nonqualified  stock  option  plan  for  key  employees  and  a  nonqualified  stock
option   plan   for   non-employee   directors   (the   Stock   Option   Plans).   See   Note   17   for   additional   information   regarding   the   Stock
Options  Plans.  The  Company  accounts  for  these  plans  under  APB  Opinion  No. 25,  under  which  no  compensation  cost  has  been
recognized,  except  for  $200,000  of  compensation  expense  related  to  the  immediate  repurchase  of  shares  issued  upon  exercise
of  certain  stock  options  in  2001.  Had  compensation  cost  for  all  options  issued  under  these  plans  been  determined  consistent
with   FASB   Statement   No.  123,   the   Company’s   net   income   and   earnings   per   share   would   have   been   reduced   as   follows   (in
thousands,  except  EPS):

2003

2002

2001

Net Income:

As reported

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based

methods for all awards, net of related tax effects

Pro Forma

Basic EPS: As reported

Pro Forma

Diluted EPS: As reported

Pro Forma

$28,719

$25,607

$19,084

(1,380)

(980)

(777)

27,339

24,627

18,307

$ 1.21

$ 1.11

$ 1.15

1.15

1.07

1.10

$ 1.07

$ 0.97

$ 0.98

1.02

0.94

0.95

Disclosures  About  Fair  Value  of  Financial  Instruments

The  following  methods  and  assumptions  were  used  to  estimate  the  fair  value  of  each  class  of  financial  instrument  held  by  the
Company:

Current  assets  and  current  liabilities:  The  carrying  value  approximates  fair  value  due  to  the  short  maturity  of  these  items.

Long-term debt: The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is based on secondary market indicators. Since the Company’s debt is
not quoted, estimates are based on each obligation’s characteristics, including remaining maturities, interest rate, credit rating, collateral,
amortization schedule and liquidity. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the variable nature of the Company’s interest on
debt.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

6 1

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Foreign  Currency

The  financial  statements  of  the  Company’s  foreign  subsidiaries  were  prepared  in  their  respective  local  currencies  and  translated
into  U.S.  dollars  based  on  the  current  exchange  rate  at  the  end  of  the  period  for  balance  sheet  items  and  an  average  rate  for  the
statement  of  income  items.  Translation  adjustments  are  reflected  as  currency  translation  adjustments  in  Stockholders’  Equity  and
are  included  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income.

Revaluation   of   U.   S.   dollar   denominated   foreign   loans   into   the   appropriate   local   currency   resulted   in   gains   of   $241,000   and
$33,000  in  2003  and  2002,  respectively,  and  a  loss  of  $81,000  in  2001.  Additionally,  foreign  currency  exchange  transaction  gains
and  losses,  most  notably,  gains  of  $504,000  and  $172,000  in  2003  and  2002,  respectively,  related  to  an  Australian  dollar  cash
account,  and  a  $508,000  loss  in  2001  from  the  partial  settlement  of  an  Australian  dollar  denominated  receivable  are  reported  in
Other  Income,  net.

Management  Estimates

The   preparation   of   financial   statements   in   conformity   with   generally   accepted   accounting   principles   requires   management   to
make   estimates   and   assumptions   that   affect   the   reported   amounts   of   assets,   liabilities,   revenues   and   expenses   during   the
reporting   period.   Significant   estimates   using   management   judgment   are   made   in   the   areas   of   recoverability   and   useful   lives   of
assets,  as  well  as  liabilities  for  casualty  claims  and  income  taxes.  Actual  results  could  differ  from  those  estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain  prior  year  balances  have  been  reclassified  to  conform  with  the  2003  presentation.

3. EXPANSION  OF  OPERATIONS:

United  States

Georgia-Pacific   Railroads: On   December  31,   2003,   the   Company   completed   the   purchase   from   Georgia-Pacific   Corporation
(GP) of  all  of  the  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  of  the  Chattahoochee  Industrial  Railroad  (CIRR),  the  Arkansas
Louisiana   &   Mississippi   Railroad   Company   (ALM),   and   the   Fordyce   &   Princeton   Railroad   Company   (F&P,   collectively,   the   Rail-
roads)  for  approximately  $54.9 million  in  cash.  The  purchase  price  was  allocated  to  current  assets  ($2.7 million),  property  and
equipment  ($37.6 million),  and  intangible  assets  ($27.1  million),  less  current  liabilities  assumed  ($12.5 million).  As  contemplated
with  the  acquisition,  the  Company  implemented  a  severance  program  which  is  included  in  the  table  below.  The  aggregate  cost  of
these   restructuring   activities   is   considered   a   liability   assumed   in   the   acquisition,   and   as   such,   was   allocated   to   the   purchase
price.

In  conjunction  with  the  acquisition,  the  Company  entered  into  two  Transportation  Services  Agreements  (TSAs)  which  are  20-year
agreements   for   the   Railroads   to   provide   rail   transportation   service   to   GP.   One   of   the   TSAs   has   been   determined   to   be   an
intangible  asset  and  approximately  $27.1 million  of  the  Railroad’s  purchase  price  has  been  allocated  to  this  asset.  The  TSA  asset
will   be   amortized   on   a   straight-line   basis   over   a   30  year   life,   which   is   the   expected   life   of   the   plant   being   served,   beginning
January 1,  2004.  The  Company  funded  the  acquisition  through  its  revolving  line  of  credit  held  under  its  primary  credit  agreement.

Oregon  Lease:  On  December 30,  2002,  the  Company  expanded  its  Oregon  region  by  commencing  railroad  operations  over  a  76-
mile  rail  line  between  Salem  and  Eugene,  Oregon  previously  operated  by  Burlington  Northern  Santa  Fe  Railway  Company  (BNSF).
The  rail  line  is  contiguous  to  the  Company’s  existing  Oregon  railroad  operations  and  increased  that  region’s  annual  carloads  and
enhanced   operations   through   more   efficient   routing   of   existing   traffic.   The   Company   is   operating   the   rail   line   under   a   15-year
lease  agreement  with  BNSF.  Under  the  lease,  no  payments  to  the  lessor  are  required  as  long  as  certain  operating  conditions  are
met.  Through  December 31,  2003,  no  payments  were  required  under  this  lease.

Utah  Railway  Company:  On  August 28,  2002,  the  Company  acquired  all  of  the  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  of
Utah   Railway   Company   (URC)  for   approximately   $55.7  million   in   cash,   including   transaction   costs.   The   purchase   price   was
allocated   to   current   assets   ($4.3  million),   property   and   equipment   ($18.1  million),   and   intangible   assets   ($35.9  million),   less
current  liabilities  assumed  ($2.6 million).  As  contemplated  with  the  acquisition,  the  Company  implemented  a  severance  program
which  is  included  in  the  table  below.  The  aggregate  cost  of  these  restructuring  activities  is  considered  a  liability  assumed  in  the
acquisition,  and  as  such,  was  allocated  to  the  purchase  price.  The  Company  funded  the  acquisition  through  its  revolving  line  of
credit  held  under  its  primary  credit  agreement.

Emons:  On  February 22,  2002,  the  Company  acquired  Emons  Transportation  Group,  Inc.  (Emons)  for  approximately  $29.4  million
in  cash,  including  transaction  costs  and  net  of  cash  received  in  the  acquisition.  The  Company  purchased  all  of  the  outstanding
shares   of   Emons   at   $2.50   per   share.   The   purchase   price   was   allocated   to   current   assets   ($4.0  million)   and   property   and
equipment   ($33.7  million),   less   assumed   current   liabilities   ($4.5  million)   and   assumed   long-term   liabilities   ($3.8  million).   As
contemplated   with   the   acquisition,   the   Company   implemented   a   severance   program   which   is   included   in   the   table   below.   The
aggregate  cost  of  these  restructuring  activities  is  considered  a  liability  assumed  in  the  acquisition,  and  as  such,  was  allocated  to

6 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the   purchase.   The   majority   of   these   costs   were   paid   in   the   three   months   ended   March  31,   2002.   The   Company   funded   the
acquisition  through  its  revolving  line  of  credit  held  under  its  primary  credit  agreement.

South  Buffalo:  On  October 1,  2001,  the  Company  acquired  all  of  the  issued  and  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  of  South
Buffalo  Railway  (South  Buffalo)  from  Bethlehem  Steel  Corp.  (Bethlehem)  for  $33.1 million  in  cash,  including  transaction  costs  and
the  assumption  of  certain  liabilities  of  $5.6 million.  The  purchase  price  was  allocated  to  current  assets  ($2.3 million),  property  and
equipment   ($17.6  million)   and   goodwill   ($18.8  million),   less   current   liabilities   assumed   ($2.4  million)   and   long-term   liabilities
assumed  ($3.2 million).  The  purchase  price  was  reduced  by  a  $669,000  adjustment  pursuant  to  the  final  determination  of  the  net
assets  of  South  Buffalo  on  the  sale  date.  This  amount,  together  with  another  $728,000  related  to  pre-acquisition  liabilities  paid
by   the   Company   on   Bethlehem’s   behalf,   was   paid   to   the   Company   in   December  2002.   Although   Bethlehem   filed   for   voluntary
protection  under  U.S.  bankruptcy  laws  on  October 5,  2001,  these  payments  were  funded  from  a  $3.0 million  escrow  account  held
by  an  independent  trustee  to  settle  amounts  due  to  the  Company  pursuant  to  the  South  Buffalo  acquisition.  As  contemplated
with   the   acquisition,   the   Company   closed   the   former   South   Buffalo   headquarters   office   in   March  2002   and   implemented   a
severance   program   which   is   included   in   the   table   below.   The   aggregate   cost   of   these   restructuring   activities   is   considered   a
liability  assumed  in  the  acquisition,  and  as  such,  was  allocated  to  the  purchase  price.  The  majority  of  these  costs  were  paid  in
2001.

The  acquisition  of  South  Buffalo  triggered  the  right  of  The  1818  Fund  III,  L.P.  (the  Fund),  a  private  equity  fund  managed  by  Brown
Brothers  Harriman  &  Co.,  to  purchase  an  additional  $5.0 million  of  the  Company’s  Series A  Mandatorily  Redeemable  Convertible
Preferred  Stock  (the  Convertible  Preferred),  and  the  Fund  exercised  that  right  on  December 11,  2001.

The  table  below  sets  forth  a  roll-forward  of  the  activity  affecting  the  restructuring  reserves  established  in  acquisitions  including
the  number  of  employees  and  actual  cash  payments:

Schedule  of  Acquisition  Restructuring  Activity

Years Ended December 31,
2002

2003

2001

Number of Employees:

Number of planned terminations related to acquisitions during the period

Actual number of employees terminated

Ending number of employees to be terminated as of the end of the period

Restructuring Reserves:

Liabilities established in purchase accounting for acquisitions

Cash payments during the period

Balance at end of period

13

—

13

39

(39)

—

26

(26)

—

1,002,000

1,382,000

876,000

—

(1,382,000)

(876,000)

$1,002,000

$

— $

—

For  U.S.  tax  purposes,  the  Company  has  made  elections  under  Internal  Revenue  Code  Section 338  to  treat  the  CIRR,  ALM,  F&P,
URC,  Emons  and  South  Buffalo  acquisitions  each  as  a  purchase  of  assets.

Australia

On   December  16,   2000,   the   Company,   through   its   50%-owned   subsidiary   ARG,   completed   the   acquisition   of   Westrail   Freight
from   the   government   of   Western   Australia   for   approximately   U.S.   $334.4  million.   To   complete   the   acquisition,   the   Company
contributed   its   formerly   wholly-owned   subsidiary,   Australia   Southern   Railroad   (ASR),   to   ARG   along   with   the   Company’s   equity
interest  in  Asia  Pacific  Transport  Consortium  (APTC) and  $21.4 million  of  cash  while  Wesfarmers,  the  other  50%  owner  of  ARG,
contributed  $64.2 million  in  cash,  including  $8.2 million  which  represents  a  long-term  Australian  dollar  denominated  non-interest
bearing  note  to  match  a  similar  note  due  to  the  Company  from  ASR  at  the  date  of  the  transaction.  ARG  funded  the  remaining
purchase  price  with  proceeds  from  its  Australian  bank  credit  facility.

The  Company  recognized  a  $10.1 million  gain  upon  the  issuance  of  ASR  stock  to  Wesfarmers  upon  the  formation  of  ARG  as  a
result   of   such   issuance   being   at   a   per   share   price   in   excess   of   the   Company’s   book   value   per   share   investment   in   ASR.
Additionally,  due  to  the  deconsolidation  of  ASR,  the  Company  recognized  a  $6.5 million  deferred  tax  expense  resulting  from  the
financial  reporting  versus  tax  basis  difference  in  the  Company’s  equity  investment  in  ARG.

On  April 20,  2001,  APTC  completed  the  arrangement  of  debt  and  equity  capital  to  build,  own  and  operate  the  Alice  Springs  to
Darwin   railway   line   in   the   Northern   Territory   of   Australia.   As   previously   arranged,   upon   APTC   reaching   financial   closure,   Wes-
farmers  contributed  an  additional  $7.4 million  into  ARG  and  accordingly,  the  Company  recorded  an  additional  gain  of  $3.7 million
related  to  the  December,  2000  issuance  of  ASR  stock  to  Wesfarmers.  A  related  deferred  income  tax  expense  of  $1.1 million  was
also  recorded.  ARG  then  paid  a  total  of  $7.4 million  to  its  two  shareholders,  in  equal  amounts  of  $3.7 million,  as  partial  payment

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

6 3

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

of  each  shareholder’s  Australian  dollar  denominated  non-interest  bearing  note,  which  resulted  in  a  $508,000  currency  transaction
loss  for  the  Company.

The   additional   gain   of   $3.7  million   relating   to   the   formation   of   ARG   represented   an   adjustment   to   the   difference   between   the
recorded  balance  of  the  Company’s  previously  wholly-owned  investment  in  Australia,  less  investment  amounts  that  the  Company
estimated   would   be   reimbursed   by   ARG,   and   the   value   of   those   Australian   operations   when   ARG   was   formed.   In   the   fourth
quarter   of   2001,   the   Company,   ARG   and   Wesfarmers   reached   agreement   as   to   the   level   of   acquisition-related   costs   to   be
reimbursed   to   both   50%   owners.   Accordingly,   the   Company   recorded   a   $728,000   decrease   to   its   previously   recorded   gain   to
reflect  the  lower  than  estimated  reimbursed  amount  for  acquisition-related  costs.

The  Company  accounts  for  its  50%  ownership  in  ARG  under  the  equity  method  of  accounting.

Canada

On  April 15,  1999,  the  Company  purchased  the  ownership  interests  of  one  of  its  joint  venture  partners  in  Canada,  Rail-One  Inc.
(Rail-One)  which  had  a  47.5%  ownership  interest  in  Genesee  Rail-One  Inc.  (GRO),  thereby  increasing  the  Company’s  ownership
of  GRO  to  95%.  Under  the  terms  of  the  purchase  agreement,  among  other  things,  the  sellers  of  Rail-One  were  granted  the  right
to  purchase  up  to  270,000  shares  of  the  Company’s  Class A  Common  Stock  at  an  exercise  price  of  $2.56  per  share  if  GRO  had
achieved  certain  financial  performance  targets  in  any  annual  period  between  1999  and  2003.  The  Company has determined  that
GRO  failed  to  achieve  these  financial  performance  targets  in  any  of  the  required  years.

Pro  Forma  Financial  Results  (unaudited)

The  following  table  summarizes  the  Company’s  unaudited  pro  forma  operating  results  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,
2002  and  2001,  as  if the  GP  Railroads, URC  and  Emons  had  been  acquired  as  of  January 1,  2002,  and  South  Buffalo  had  been
acquired  as  of  January 1,  2001  (in  thousands,  except  per  share  amounts):

Operating revenues

Net income

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

2003

2002

2001

$262,428

$245,330

$187,688

30,424

29,218

21,008

1.28

1.14

1.27

1.11

1.25

1.05

The  unaudited  pro  forma  operating  results  include  the  acquisitions  of the  GP  Railroads, URC,  Emons  and  South  Buffalo  adjusted,
net   of   tax,   for   depreciation   expense   resulting   from   the   step-up   of
the   GP   Railroads   and South   Buffalo   property   based   on
appraised  values,  depreciation  expense  reduction  resulting  from  the  allocation  of  negative  goodwill  to  the  asset  values  of  URC
and  Emons,  URC  contractual  intercompany  management  fees,  and  incremental  interest  expense  related  to  borrowings  used  to
fund  the GP  Railroads, URC,  Emons  and  South  Buffalo  acquisitions.  The  unaudited  pro  forma  operating  results  also  include  the
issuance   of   $5.0  million   of   Convertible   Preferred   Stock   triggered   by   the   South   Buffalo   acquisition.   In   accordance   with   the
Company’s  adoption  of  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board’s  Statement  No. 142,  ‘‘Goodwill  and  Other  Intangible  Assets’’,
no  amortization  of  the  acquired  goodwill  is  reflected  in  the  unaudited  pro  forma  operating  results.

These  results  exclude  the  gain  on  sale  of  50%  of  equity  in  Australian  operations  recorded  in  2001.

The  pro  forma  financial  information  does  not  purport  to  be  indicative  of  the  results  that  actually  would  have  been  obtained  had  all
the  transactions  been  completed  as  of  the  assumed  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  and  are  not  intended  to  be  a  projection
of  future  results  or  trends.

4. ALLOWANCE  FOR  DOUBTFUL  ACCOUNTS:

Activity  in  the  Company’s  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  was  as  follows  (in  thousands):

Balance, beginning of year

Provisions

Charges

Established in acquisitions

Balance, end of year

6 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

2003

2002

2001

$ 1,741

$ 1,001

$ 1,308

878

(605)

—

716

(402)

426

468

(775)

—

$ 2,014

$ 1,741

$ 1,001

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

5. PROPERTY  AND  EQUIPMENT:

Major  classifications  of  property  and  equipment  are  as  follows  (in  thousands):

Property:

Land & Land Improvements

Buildings & Leasehold Improvements

Bridges/Tunnels/Culverts

Track Property

Total Road Property

Equipment:

Computer Equipment

Locomotives & Freight Cars

Vehicles & Mobile Equipment

Signals & Crossing Equipment

Other Equipment

Total Equipment

Total Property and Equipment

Less Accumulated Depreciation

Net Property and Equipment

2003

2002

$ 23,931

$ 19,910

16,278

39,647

14,054

32,254

245,346

201,295

325,202

267,513

4,171

46,573

13,200

5,609

7,390

3,833

41,969

10,673

4,936

8,255

76,943

69,666

402,145

337,179

(86,800)

(72,451)

$315,345

$264,728

6. INTANGIBLE  AND  OTHER  ASSETS,  NET  AND  GOODWILL:

Acquired  intangible  assets  and  other  assets  are  as  follows  (in  thousands):

December 31, 2003

December 31, 2002

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Assets

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Net
Assets

INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

Amortizable intangible assets:

Chiapas-Mayab Operating License

$ 7,058

$ 999

$ 6,059

$ 7,629

$ 826

$ 6,803

Amended and Restated Service

Assurance Agreement

Transportation Services Agreement

Non-amortizable intangible assets:

Track Access Agreements

Total Intangible Assets

OTHER ASSETS:

Deferred financing costs

Other assets

Total Other Assets

10,566

27,055

35,891

80,570

6,607

5,370

11,977

216

—

10,350

27,055

10,566

—

—

35,891

35,891

1,213

79,357

54,086

1,841

43

1,884

4,766

5,327

6,355

4,721

10,093

11,076

—

—

—

826

590

30

620

10,566

—

35,891

53,260

5,765

4,691

10,456

Total Intangible and Other Assets

$92,547

$3,097

$89,450

$65,162

$1,446

$63,716

The  Chiapas-Mayab  Operating  License  is  being  amortized  over  30 years  which  is  the  life  of  the  concession  agreement  with  the
Mexican   Communications   and   Transportation   Department.   Amortization   expense   for   the   year   ended   December   31,   2003   was
$150,000;  estimated  annual  amortization  for  the  next  five  years  is  $150,000  per  year.

On   July  23,   2003   as   a   result   of   a   settlement   agreement   with   Commonwealth   Edison   Company   (See   Note   16),   the   Company
amended   and   restated   the   Service   Assurance   Agreement   (SAA)  and   began   to   amortize   the   Amended   and   Restated   Service
Assurance  Agreement  (ARSAA).  The  estimate  of  the  useful  life  of  the  ARSAA  asset  is  based  on  the  Company’s  estimate  of  the

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

6 5

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

useful  life  of  the  coal-fired  electricity  generation  plant  to  which  the  Company  provides  service,  which  the  Company  estimates  will
be   in   service   through   2027.   Amortization   expense   for   the   ARSAA   for   the   year   ended   December   31,   2003   was   $216,000;
estimated  annual  amortization  for  the  next  five  years  is  $432,000  per  year.  In  2002,  upon  adoption  of  SFAS  No. 142,  the  SAA  was
determined  to  have  an  indefinite  useful  life  and  therefore  was  not  subject  to  amortization.

The  Transportation  Services  Agreement,  entered  into  in  conjunction  with  the  GP  transaction  (the  TSA),  is  a  20-year  agreement  to
provide  exclusive  rail  transportation  service  to  GP  facilities.  The  Company  believes  that  the  customer’s  facilities  have  a  30-year
economic   life   and   that   the   Company   will   continue   to   be   the   exclusive   rail   transportation   service   provider   until   the   end   of   the
plant’s  useful  life.  Therefore,  the  TSA  will  be  amortized  on  a  straight-line  basis  over  a  30-year  life  beginning  January 1,  2004.
Estimated  annual  amortization  for  the  next  five  years  is  $902,000  per  year.

The   Track   Access   Agreements   are   perpetual   trackage   agreements   assumed   in   the   Company’s   acquisition   of   Utah   Railway
Company.  Under  SFAS  No. 142  these  assets  have  been  determined  to  have  an  indefinite  useful  life  and  therefore  are  not  subject
to  amortization.

Deferred   financing   costs   are   amortized   over   terms   of   the   related   debt   using   the   straight-line   method,   which   is   not   materially
different  from  amortization  computed  using  the  effective-interest  method.  Amortization  expense  for  the  year  ended  December 31,
2003   was   approximately   $1.2  million;   estimated   annual   amortization   for   the   next   four   years,   which   is   the   remaining   life   of   the
asset,  is  $1.2 million  per  year.

Other   assets   primarily   consist   of   executive   split   dollar   life   insurance,   assets   held   for   sale,   a   minority   equity   investment   in   an
agricultural  facility,  and  in  2002,  notes  receivable  due  from  executives.  Executive  split  dollar  life  insurance  is  the  present  value  of
life   insurance   benefits   which   the   Company   funds   but   that   are   owned   by   executive   officers.   The   Company   retains   a   collateral
interest  in  the  policies’  cash  values  and  death  benefits.  Assets  held  for  sale  or  future  use  primarily  represent  excess  track  and
locomotives.  Notes  receivable  due  from  Company  executives,  which  bore  interest  at  5.69%  and  were  due  in  annual  installments
were  $486,000  as  of  December  31,  2002.  These  notes  were  repaid  in  2003.

Goodwill   for   all   acquisitions   made   prior   to   July  2001   was   amortized   on   a   straight-line   basis   over   lives   of   15-20   years   through
December  31,   2001,   and   in   accordance   with   the   adoption   of   SFAS   No.  142,   amortization   of   goodwill   was   discontinued   as   of
January 1,  2002.  The  changes  in  the  carrying  amount  of  goodwill  are  as  follows:

Years Ended
December 31,
2002
2003

$24,174

$24,144

—

—

348

—

—

—

30

—

$24,522

$24,174

Years Ended December 31,
2001
2002
2003

$28,719

$25,607

$19,084

—

—

—

—

236

488

$28,719

$25,607

$19,808

Goodwill:

Balance at beginning of period

Goodwill acquired during period

Amortization

Currency translation and other adjustments

Impairment losses

Balance at end of period

The  Company’s  adjusted  net  income  and  per  share  amounts  are  as  follows:

Reported net income

Addback:

Goodwill amortization, net of tax

SAA amortization, net of tax

Adjusted net income

6 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Reported basic earnings per share

Addback:

Goodwill amortization, net of tax

SAA amortization, net of tax

Adjusted basic earnings per share

Reported diluted earnings per share

Addback:

Goodwill amortization, net of tax

SAA amortization, net of tax

Adjusted diluted earnings per share

7. EQUITY  INVESTMENTS:

Australian  Railroad  Group

Years Ended December 31,
2001
2002
2003

$ 1.21

$ 1.11

$ 1.15

—

—

—

—

0.01

0.03

$ 1.21

$ 1.11

$ 1.19

Years Ended December 31,
2001
2002
2003

$ 1.07

$ 0.97

$ 0.98

—

—

—

—

0.01

0.03

$ 1.07

$ 0.97

$ 1.02

The  following  condensed  financial  data  of  ARG  is  based  on  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  and
converted  into  thousands  of  U.S.  dollars  based  on  the  following  Australian  dollar  to  U.S.  dollar  exchange  rates:

As of December 31, 2003

As of December 31, 2002

As of December 31, 2001

Average for the year ended December 31, 2003

Average for the year ended December 31, 2002

Average for the year ended December 31, 2001

$.751

$.561

$.510

$.662

$.545

$.518

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP
STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(U.S.  dollars,  in  thousands)

For the Years Ended December 31,
2002

2003

2001

Operating revenues

Operating expenses

Restructuring costs

Bid costs

Total operating expenses

Income from operations

Interest expense

Other income, net

Income before income taxes

Provision for income taxes

Net income

$249,571

$211,067

$188,490

194,089

161,146

139,343

267

—

2,583

867

—

1,752

194,356

164,596

141,095

55,215

(33,877)

3,271

24,609

3,866

46,471

(24,859)

886

22,498

5,524

47,395

(22,505)

596

25,486

8,584

$ 20,743

$ 16,974

$ 16,902

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

6 7

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP
BALANCE SHEETS

(U.S.  dollars,  in  thousands)

As of
December 31,

2003

2002

$ 26,618

$

5,882

47,764

10,033

3,069

30,315

7,985

2,061

87,484

46,243

478,808

402,286

80,193

—

5,476

10,592

53,380

4,224

$651,961

$516,725

$

— $133,263

7,199

35,111

—

8,784

20,579

1,672

42,310

164,298

367,892

195,039

14,271

2,031

9,133

11,562

2,498

1,031

16,621

8,642

404,889

223,831

16,212

11,807

188,550

116,789

$651,961

$516,725

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:

Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable, net

Materials and supplies

Prepaid expenses and other

Total current assets

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net

DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS

RESTRICTED CASH

OTHER ASSETS, net

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Current portion of long-term debt

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Current income tax liabilities

Total current liabilities

LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion

DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES, net

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

FAIR VALUE OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS

SUBORDINATED NOTES TO STOCKHOLDERS

Total non-current liabilities

REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

6 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(U.S.  dollars,  in  thousands)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities-

Depreciation and amortization

Deferred income taxes

Gain on disposition of property

Changes in assets and liabilities

Net cash provided by operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchase of property and equipment

Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment

Transfer from (to) restricted funds on deposit

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Payments on borrowings

Borrowings on debt

Proceeds from issuance of shares

Repayment of subordinated loans

Refund of goods and services tax received from acquisition of Westrail Freight

For the Years Ended
December 31,
2002

2003

2001

$ 20,743

$16,974

$16,902

23,443

11,283

(2,081)

(8,095)

17,191

13,392

3,665

(314)

7,252

(152)

(7,743)

4,004

45,293

29,773

41,398

(35,774)

(28,423)

(54,358)

6,924

1,752

152

69,978

(46,957)

(6,351)

41,128

(73,628)

(60,557)

(430,385)

— (16,360)

360,493

38,990

20,452

—

—

—

—

—

—

7,685

(7,685)

16,457

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

(69,892)

38,990

20,549

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE DIFFERENCES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

4,207

839

(553)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year

20,736

5,882

(4,026)

9,908

837

9,071

$ 26,618

$ 5,882

$ 9,908

South  America

The  following  condensed financial  data  for  Empresa  Ferroviaria  Oriental,  S.A.  (Oriental)  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,
2002  and  2001  have  a  U.S.  dollar  functional  currency  and  are  based  on  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United
States  (in  thousands).  The  Company  has  a  22.89%  indirect  ownership  interest  in  Oriental  which  is  located  in  eastern  Bolivia.

Operating revenues

Net income

Years Ended December 31,
2001
2002
2003

$27,130

$30,658

$27,440

5,175

7,239

5,979

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

6 9

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Condensed  balance  sheet  information  for  Oriental  as  of  December 31,  2003  and  2002:

Current assets

Non-current assets

Total assets

Current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Senior debt

Stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

2003

2002

$14,374

$15,153

55,237

54,537

$69,611

$69,690

$ 5,617

$ 5,823

4,702

1,568

3,853

1,350

57,724

58,664

$69,611

$69,690

The  above  data  does  not  include  non-recourse  debt  of  $12.0 million  held  at  an  intermediate  unconsolidated  affiliate  or  any  of  the
general  and  administrative,  interest  or  income  tax  costs  at  various  intermediate  unconsolidated  affiliates.  The  Company’s  share  of
costs  from  the  intermediate  unconsolidated  affiliates  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001  were  $828,100,
$678,625  and  $954,647,  respectively.

As  noted  previously,  the  Company  holds  its  equity  interest  in  Oriental  through  a  number  of  intermediate  holding  companies,  and
the  Company  accounts  for  its  interest  in  Oriental  under  the  equity  method  of  accounting.  The  Company  indirectly  holds  a  12.52%
equity  interest  in  Oriental  through  an  interest  in  Genesee  &  Wyoming  Chile  (GWC),  and  the  Company  holds  its  remaining  10.37%
equity   interest   in   Oriental   through   other   companies.   GWC   is   an   obligor   of   non-recourse   debt   of   $12.0  million,   which   has   an
adjustable   interest   rate   dependent   on   operating   results   of   Oriental.   This   non-recourse   debt   is   secured   by   a   lien   over   GWC’s
indirect  equity  interest  in  Oriental.

This  debt  became  due  and  payable  on  November 2,  2003.  Due  to  the  political  and  economic  unrest  and  uncertainties  in  Bolivia,  it
has  become  difficult  for  GWC  to  refinance  this  debt  and  the  Company  has  chosen  not  to  repay  the  non-recourse  obligation.  GWC
entered  into  discussions  with  its  creditors  on  plans  to  restructure  the  debt,  and  as  a  result  of  those  discussions,  GWC  obtained  a
written   waiver   from   the   creditors   which   expired   on   January  31,   2004.   Negotiations   with   the   creditors   continue,   and   currently,
none  of  GWC’s  creditors  have  commenced  court  proceedings  to  (i) collect  on  the  debt  or  (ii) exercise  their  rights  pursuant  to  the
lien.

If  the  Company  were  to  lose  its  12.52%  equity  stake  in  Oriental  due  to  creditors  exercising  their  lien  on  GWC’s  indirect  equity
interest  in  Oriental,  the  Company  would  record  a  $232,000  write-off,  the  basis  of  its  investment  in  Oriental  held  through  GWC.
Because   the   $12.0  million of debt   is   serviced   by income received   by   GWC   from   Oriental,   the   Company’s   loss   of   the   12.52%
equity  interest  in  Oriental  would  not  have  a  material  adverse  impact  on  the  Company’s  future  equity  income.  A  default,  accelera-
tion  or  effort  to  foreclose  on  the  lien  under  the  non-recourse  debt  will  have  no  impact  on  the  Company’s  remaining  10.37%  equity
interest   in   Oriental,   because   that   equity   interest   is   held   indirectly   through   holding   companies   outside   of   GWC’s   ownership   in
Oriental.  The  Company  plans  to  continue  providing  management  resources  to  Oriental  and  generates  substantially  all  of  its  equity
income  through  the  10.37%  ownership  interest.

Oriental  has  no  obligations  associated  with  the  $12.0 million of debt.  In  addition,  a  default,  acceleration  or  effort  to  foreclose  on
the   lien   under   the   non-recourse   debt   would   not   result   in   a   breach   of   a   representation,   warranty,   covenant,   cross-default   or
acceleration  under  the  Company’s  Senior  Credit  Facility.

The   Company’s   retained   earnings   at   December  31,   2003   and   2002   include   $34.2  million   and   $24.0  million,   respectively,   of
combined  ARG  and  South  America  undistributed  earnings.

8. LEASES:

The  Company  has  entered  into  several  leases  for  freight  cars,  locomotives  and  other  equipment.  Related  operating  lease  expense
for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001  was  approximately  $9.5 million,  $9.2 million  and  $8.1 million,  respec-
tively.  Additionally,  the  Company  leases  certain  real  property  which  resulted  in  lease  expense  for  the  years  ended  December 31,
2003,  2002  and  2001  of  approximately  $1.6 million,  $1.5 million,  and  $1.2 million,  respectively.

On   March  30,   2001,   the   Company   completed   the   sale   of   certain   rolling   stock   to   a   financial   institution   for   a   net   sale   price   of
$6.5 million.  The  proceeds  were  used  to  reduce  borrowings  under  the  Company’s  revolving  credit  facilities.  Simultaneously,  the
Company  entered  into  an  agreement  with  this  financial  institution  to  lease  this  rolling  stock  for  a  period  of  eight  years  including
renewals.   The   sale/leaseback   transaction   resulted   in   an   aggregate   deferred   gain   of   $1.8  million.   Due   to   certain   contingent
payments  at  lease  end,  the  Company  is  not  amortizing  this  gain  as  a  non-cash  offset  to  rent  expense.

The  Company  anticipates  renewing  the  above-mentioned  lease  at  all  available  lease  renewal  dates.  If  the  Company  chooses  not
to   renew   this   and   certain   other   leases,   it   would   be   obligated   to   return   the   rolling   stock   and   pay   aggregate   fees   of   up   to

7 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

approximately  $8.2 million.  Under  certain  of  these  leases,  in  lieu  of  this  payment  the  Company  has  the  option  to  purchase  the
underlying  rolling  stock  for  a  maximum  aggregate  price  of  approximately  $22.1 million.  Management  anticipates  the  future  market
value  of  the  leased  rolling  stock  will  equal  or  exceed  the  payments  necessary  to  purchase  the  rolling  stock.

The  following  is  a  summary  of  future  minimum  lease  payments  (without  consideration  of  $4.0 million  of  amortizing  deferred  gains
from  sale/leasebacks)  under  noncancelable  leases  and  expected  automatic  renewals  (in  thousands):

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Thereafter

Total minimum payments

Noncancelable

Automatic
Renewals

Totals

$ 7,794

$ 4,430

$12,224

5,670

3,201

2,239

1,700

2,415

4,430

4,430

4,430

1,595

691

10,100

7,631

6,669

3,295

3,106

$23,019

$20,006

$43,025

The  Company  is  party  to  certain  lease  agreements  with  Class I  carriers  to  operate  over  various  rail  lines  in  North  America.  Under
the  leases,  no  payments  to  the  lessors  are  required  as  long  as  certain  operating  conditions  are  met.  Through  December 31,  2003,
no  payments  were  required  under  these  lease  arrangements.

9. LONG-TERM  DEBT:

Long-term  debt  consists  of  the  following  (in  thousands):

Credit facilities with variable interest rates (weighted average of 3.27% and 3.81% before impact of interest

rate swaps at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively)

Limited recourse U.S. dollar denominated promissory notes of Mexican subsidiary with variable interest rates
(4.68% and 5.33% before impact of interest rate swaps at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively)

Other debt with interest rates up to 5.33% and maturing at various dates between 2004 and 2006

Less — Current portion

Long-term debt, less current portion

Credit  Facilities

2003

2002

$132,417

$ 94,831

23,163

2,442

27,500

3,086

158,022

125,417

6,589

6,116

$151,433

$119,301

On  October 31,  2002,  the  Company  amended  and  restated  its  senior  secured  credit  facilities  thereby  increasing  the  facilities  to
$250.0 million.  The  facilities  are  composed  of  a  $223.0 million  revolving  loan  and  a  US$27.0 million  Canadian  term  loan,  each
maturing  in  2007.  The  Canadian  term  loan  is  funded  in  Canadian  dollars  and  principal  and  interest  payments  on  the  term  loan  are
made  in  Canadian  dollars.  Under  the  terms  of  the  financing,  the  Company  may  expand  the  size  of  the  facilities  to  $350.0 million  if
certain   criteria   are   met   in   the   future.   A   portion   of   the   new   $250.0  million   facilities   were   used   to   refinance   approximately
$100.0 million  of  existing  debt  at  the  Company’s  U.S.  and  Canadian  subsidiaries.  The  remaining  $150.0 million  ($113.4 million  at
December 31,  2003)  of  unused  borrowing  capacity  is  available  for  general  corporate  purposes  including  acquisitions.  In  conjunc-
tion   with   the   refinancing,   the   Company   recorded   a   non-cash   after   tax   write   off   of   $375,000   related   to   unamortized   deferred
financing  costs  of  the  refinanced  debt.

The   Canadian   term   loan   is   due   in   quarterly   installments   which   began   March  31,   2003,   and   matures,   along   with   the   revolving
credit  facilities,  on  October 31,  2007.  The  credit  facilities  accrue  interest  at  rates  based  on  various  indices  plus  an  applicable
margin,  which  varies  from  1.75  to  2.5 percentage  points  depending  upon  the  ratio  of  the  Company’s  funded  debt  to  Earnings
Before  Interest,  Taxes,  Depreciation,  Amortization  and  Operating  Leases  (EBITDAR),  as  defined  in  the  credit  agreement.  Interest
is  payable  in  arrears  based  on  certain  elections  of  the  Company,  not  to  exceed  three  months  outstanding.  The  Company  pays  a
commitment   fee   on   all   unused   portions   of   the   revolving   credit   facility   which   varies   between   0.375%   and   0.500%   per   annum
depending   on   the   Company’s   funded   debt   to   EBITDAR   ratio.   The   credit   agreement   requires   mandatory   prepayments   from   the
issuance  of  new  equity  or  debt  and  from  the  proceeds  of  asset  sales  that  are  not  reinvested  in  capital  assets  in  certain  periods  of
time,  as  defined  in  the  agreement.  The  credit  facilities  are  collateralized  by  essentially  all  of  the  Company’s  assets  in  the  United
States   and   Canada.   The   credit   agreement   requires   the   maintenance   of   certain   covenant   ratios   or   amounts,   including,   but   not
limited  to,  funded  debt  to  EBITDAR,  interest  coverage,  minimum  net  worth,  and  maximum  capital  expenditures,  all  as  defined  in

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

7 1

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the  agreement.  The  Company  and  its  subsidiaries  were  in  compliance  with  the  provisions  of  these  covenants  as  of  December 31,
2003.

Limited  Recourse  Promissory  Notes

On   December  7,   2000,   one   of   the   Company’s   subsidiaries   in   Mexico,   Servicios,   entered   into   three   promissory   notes   payable
(Notes)  totaling  $27.5 million  with  variable  interest  rates  based  on  LIBOR  plus  3.5 percentage  points.  Two  of  the  Notes  have  an
eight  year  term  with  principal  payments  of  $1.4 million  due  semi-annually  beginning  March 15,  2003,  through  the  maturity  date  of
September  15,   2008.   The   third   Note   has   a   nine   year   term   with   principal   payments   of   $750,000   due   semi-annually   beginning
March 15,  2003,  with  a  maturity  date  of  September 15,  2009.  The  Notes  are  secured  by  essentially  all  the  assets  of  Servicios  and
its   subsidiary,   Compania   de   Ferrocarriles   Chiapas-Mayab,   S.A.   de   C.V.,   (FCCM),   and   a   pledge   of   the   Company’s   shares   of
Servicios  and  FCCM.  The  Company  is  obligated  to  provide  up  to  $8.0 million  of  funding  to  its  Mexican  subsidiaries,  if  necessary,
to   meet   their   investment   or   financial   obligations   prior   to   completing   the   investment   phase   of   the   project   funded   by   the   Notes
(‘‘Physical   Completion’’),   consisting   of   several   obligations   related   to   capital   investments,   operating   performance   and   manage-
ment  systems  and  controls. In  addition, the  Company  is  obligated  to  provide $7.5 million  in  funding  to  Servicios  to  meet  its  debt
service  obligations  prior  to  completing  the  financial  phase  of  the  project  (‘‘Financial  Completion’’),  consisting  of  several  financial
performance  thresholds.  At  present,  FCCM  has  yet  to  achieve  Physical  Completion  or  Financial  Completion. Based  on  current
circumstances,  it  is  reasonably  likely  that  the  Company  will  have  to  fund  a  portion  of  its funding  obligation  in  order  to  meet  the
future  principal  repayment  obligations  of  the  Notes.  The  Notes  contain  certain  financial  covenants  which  Servicios  is  in  compli-
ance  with  as  of  December 31,  2003.

Schedule  of  Future  Payments

The  following  is  a  summary  of  the  maturities  of  long-term  debt  as  of  December 31,  2003  (in  thousands):

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Thereafter

$

6,589

6,361

6,345

131,994

4,432

2,301

$158,022

10. FINANCIAL  RISK  MANAGEMENT:

The   Company   actively   monitors   its   exposure   to   interest   rate   and   foreign   currency   exchange   rate   risks   and   uses   derivative
financial   instruments   to   manage   the   impact   of   certain   of   these   risks.   The   Company   uses   derivatives   only   for   purposes   of
managing   risk   associated   with   underlying   exposures.   The   Company   does   not   trade   or   use   instruments   with   the   objective   of
earning  financial  gains  on  the  interest  rate  or  exchange  rate  fluctuations  alone,  nor  does  it  use  instruments  where  there  are  not
underlying  exposures.  Complex  instruments  involving  leverage  or  multipliers  are  not  used.  Management  believes  that  its  use  of
derivative   instruments   to   manage   risk   is   in   the   Company’s   best   interest.   However,   the   Company’s   use   of   derivative   financial
instruments  may  result  in  short-term  gains  or  losses  and  increased  earnings  volatility.

On  January 1,  2001,  the  Company  adopted  SFAS  No. 133,  ‘‘Accounting  for  Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities,’’  as
amended   by   SFAS   No.  137   and   SFAS   No.  138.   In   accordance   with   the   provisions   of   SFAS   No.  133,   the   Company   recorded   a
transition  adjustment  upon  adoption  of  the  standard  to  recognize  its  derivative  instruments  at  the  then  fair  value  of  a  liability  of
$388,000.  The  effect  of  this  transition  adjustment  did  not  impact  earnings  and  was  not  material  to  accumulated  other  compre-
hensive  income.

Initially,  upon  adoption  of  the  new  derivative  accounting  standard,  and  prospectively  as  of  the  date  new  derivatives  are  entered
into,  the  Company  designates  the  derivatives  as  a  hedge  of  a  forecasted  transaction  or  of  the  variability  of  the  cash  flows  to  be
received  or  paid  in  the  future  related  to  a  recognized  asset  or  liability  (cash  flow  hedge).  The  portion  of  the  changes  in  the  fair
value  of  the  derivative  that  is  designated  as  a  cash  flow  hedge  that  is  offset  by  changes  in  the  expected  cash  flows  related  to  a
recognized   asset   or   liability   (the   effective   portion)   is   recorded   in   accumulated   other   comprehensive   income.   When   the   hedged
item   is   realized,   the   gain   or   loss   included   in   accumulated   other   comprehensive   income   is   reported   on   the   same   line   in   the
consolidated  statements  of  income,  as  the  hedged  item.  In  addition,  the  portion  of  the  changes  in  fair  value  of  derivatives  used
as   cash   flow   hedges   that   is   not   offset   by   changes   in   the   expected   cash   flows   related   to   a   recognized   asset   or   liability   (the
ineffective  portion)  is  immediately  recognized.

The  Company  formally  documents  its  hedge  relationships,  including  identifying  the  hedge  instruments  and  hedged  items,  as  well
as   its   risk   management   objectives   and   strategies   for   entering   into   the   hedge   transaction.   Derivatives   are   recorded   in   the
consolidated   balance   sheets   at   fair   value   in   prepaid   expenses   and   other   assets,   net,   accrued   expenses   or   other   long-term

7 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

liabilities.  This  process  includes  matching  the  hedge  instrument  to  the  underlying  hedged  item  (assets,  liabilities,  firm  commit-
ments   or   forecasted   transactions).   At   hedge   inception   and   at   least   quarterly   thereafter,   the   Company   assesses   whether   the
derivatives   used   to   hedge   transactions   are   highly   effective   in   offsetting   changes   in   either   the   fair   value   or   cash   flows   of   the
hedged   item.   When   it   is   determined   that   a   derivative   ceases   to   be   a   highly   effective   hedge,   the   Company   discontinues   hedge
accounting,   and   any   gains   or   losses   on   the   derivative   instrument   are   recognized   in   earnings   during   the   period   it   no   longer
qualifies  as  a  hedge.  Summarized  below  are  the  specific  accounting  policies  by  market  risk  category.

Interest  Rate  Risk

The  Company  uses  interest  rate  swap  agreements  to  manage  its  exposure  to  changes  in  interest  rates  for  its  floating  rate  debt.
Interest  rate  swap  agreements  are  accounted  for  as  cash  flow  hedges.  Gains  or  losses  on  the  swaps,  representing  interest  rate
differentials   to   be   received   or   paid   on   the   swaps,   are   recognized   in   the   consolidated   statements   of   income   as   a   reduction   or
increase   in   interest   expense,   respectively.   The   effective   portion   of   the   change   in   the   fair   value   of   the   derivative   instrument   is
recorded  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  as  a  component  of  current  assets  or  liabilities  and  other  comprehensive  income.  The
ineffective  portion  of  the  change  in  the  fair  value  of  the  derivative  instrument,  along  with  the  gain  or  loss  on  the  hedged  item,  is
recorded  in  earnings  and  reported  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income,  on  the  same  line  as  the  hedged  item.  During  2003,
2002  and  2001,  the  Company  determined  there  was  no  ineffectiveness.

During  2003,  2002  and  2001,  the  Company  entered  into  various  interest  rate  swaps  fixing  its  base  interest  rate  by  exchanging  its
variable   LIBOR   interest   rates   on   long-term   debt   for   a   fixed   interest   rate.   The   swaps   expire   at   various   dates   through   Septem-
ber  2007   and   the   fixed   base   rates   range   from   3.35%   to   5.46%.   At   December  31,   2003   and   2002,   the   notional   amount   under
these  agreements  was  $60.6 million  and  $50.6 million,  respectively  and  the  fair  value  of  these  interest  rate  swaps  was  a  negative
$2.2 million  and  $2.3 million,  respectively.

Foreign  Currency  Exchange  Rate  Risk

The   Company   uses   purchased   options   to   manage   foreign   currency   exchange   rate   risk   related   to   certain   projected   cash   flows
related  to  foreign  operations.  Under  SFAS  No. 133,  the  instruments  are  carried  at  fair  value  in  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  as
a   component   of   prepayments   or   other   assets   or   accrued   expenses   or   other   liabilities.   Changes   in   the   fair   value   of   derivative
instruments   that   are   used   to   manage   exchange   rate   risk   in   foreign   currency   denominated   cash   flows   are   recognized   in   the
consolidated  balance  sheets  as  a  component  of  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  in  common  stockholders’  equity.

During   2003,   2002   and   2001,   the   Company   entered   into   various   exchange   rate   options   that   established   exchange   rates   for
converting  Mexican  Pesos  to  U.S.  Dollars.  The  options  expire  in  2004,  and  give  the  Company  the  right  to  sell  Mexican  Pesos  for
U.S.   Dollars   at   an   exchange   rate   of   12.91   Mexican   Pesos   to   the   U.S.   Dollar   and   12.61   Mexican   Pesos   to   the   U.S.   Dollar.   At
December 31,  2003  and  2002,  the  notional  amount  under  exchange  rate  options  was  $5.3  million  and  $6.4 million,  respectively.
The  Company  paid  up-front  premiums  for  certain  of  these  options  in  2003  and  2002  totaling  $115,000  and  $140,000,  respec-
tively.   At   December  31,   2003   and   2002,   the   fair   value   of   these   exchange   rate   currency   options   was   $17,000   and   $127,000,
respectively.

11. CLASS  A  COMMON  STOCK:

In   November  2001,   the   Company   completed   a   universal   shelf   registration   of   up   to   $200  million   of   various   debt   and   equity
securities.  The  form  and  terms  of  such  securities  shall  be  determined  when  and  if  these  securities  are  issued.  On  December 21,
2001,   as   an   initial   draw   on   the   shelf   registration,   the   Company   sold   5.9  million   shares   of   Class  A   Common   Stock   in   a   public
offering  at  a  price  of  $12.33  per  share  for  net  proceeds  of  $66.5 million.  The  proceeds  were  used  to  pay  revolving  debt  under  the
Company’s  primary  credit  agreement  and  for  general  corporate  purposes.

Additionally,  certain  stockholders  (after  exercising  options  and  converting  shares  of  Class B  Common  Stock  into  96,962  shares  of
Class A  Common  Stock)  sold  675,000  shares  in  this  offering.  While  the  Company  paid  all  issuance  costs  (except  for  the  related
underwriter’s  fee),  the  Company  did  not  receive  any  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  stockholder  shares.

12. MANDATORILY  REDEEMABLE  CONVERTIBLE  PREFERRED  STOCK:

In  December 2000,  to  fund  its  cash  investment  in  ARG,  the  Company  completed  a  private  placement  of  its  Series A  Mandatorily
Redeemable   Convertible   Preferred   Stock   (the   Convertible   Preferred),   with   The   1818   Fund   III,   LP,   a   private   equity   partnership
managed  by  Brown  Brothers  Harriman  &  Co.  (the  Fund).  The  Company  exercised  its  option  to  fund  $20.0 million  of  a  possible
$25.0  million   in   gross   proceeds   from   the   Convertible   Preferred.   The   Fund   also   received   an   option   to   invest   an   additional
$5.0 million  in  the  Company  provided  that  the  Company  completed  future  acquisitions  with  an  aggregate  purchase  price  greater
than  $25.0 million.  In  December 2001,  upon  final  approval  by  the  Surface  Transportation  Board  of  the  Company’s  acquisition  of
South   Buffalo   Railway,   The   Fund   exercised   its   option   and   purchased   an   additional   $5.0  million   of   the   Convertible   Preferred.
Dividends  on  the  Convertible  Preferred  are  cumulative  and  payable  in  cash  quarterly  in  arrears  in  an  annual  amount  equal  to  4%
of  the  issue  price.  Each  share  of  the  Convertible  Preferred  is  convertible  at  any  time  into  shares  of  Class A  Common  Stock  of  the
Company   at   a   conversion   price   of   $6.815   per   share   of   Class  A   Common   Stock   (3,668,478   shares   of   Common   Stock).   The

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

7 3

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Convertible   Preferred   is   callable   by   the   Company   after   December  12,   2004,   and   is   mandatorily   redeemable   on   December  12,
2008.  At  December 31,  2003,  no  shares  of  Convertible  Preferred  have  been  converted  into  shares  of  Class A  Common  Stock.
Issuance   fees   are   being   amortized   as   additional   dividends   over   the   Convertible   Preferred’s   eight   year   life.   At   any   time   after
December  12,   2001,   upon   conversion   of   the   Convertible   Preferred   into   Class  A   Common   Stock,   the   Fund   may   require   the
Company  to  register  such  common  stock  with  the  SEC  for  sale  pursuant  to  a  registration  rights  agreement.

13. PENSION  AND  OTHER  POSTRETIREMENT  BENEFIT  PLANS:

The  Company  administers  two  noncontributory  defined  benefit  plans  for  union  and  non-union  employees  of  two  U.S.  subsidiaries.
Benefits   are   determined   based   on   a   fixed   amount   per   year   of   credited   service.   The   Company’s   funding   policy   is   to   make
contributions  for  pension  benefits  based  on  actuarial  computations  which  reflect  the  long-term  nature  of  the  plans.  The  Company
has  met  the  minimum  funding  requirements  according  to  the  Employee  Retirement  Income  Security  Act.  On  January 31,  2002,
the  Company  froze  the  defined  benefit  plan  for  employees  of  one  of  the  subsidiaries.  Effective  that  date,  new  employees  will  not
be   eligible   to   participate   in   such   plan,   and   future   earnings   for   current   participants   will   not   be   eligible   in   the   computation   of
benefits  for  those  participants.

The  Company  provides  health  care  and  life  insurance  benefits  for  certain  retired  employees  including  union  employees  of  one  of
its  U.S.  subsidiaries  and  certain  nonunion  employees  who  have  reached  the  age  of  55  with  30  or  more  years  of  service.  As  of
December 31,  2003,  there  were  109  current  or  retired  employees  eligible  for  these  health  care  and  life  insurance  benefits.  Forty
of   the   employees   currently   participate   and   the   remaining   sixty-nine   employees   may   become   eligible   for   these   benefits   upon
retirement  if  certain  combinations  of  age  and  years  of  service  are  met.  The  Company  funds  the  plans  on  a  pay-as-you-go  basis.

The   Company   is   currently   evaluating   any   effects   the   Medicare   Prescription   Drug,   Improvement   and   Modernization   Act   of   2003
(Act)  may  have  on  its  postretirement  plan  and  its  Consolidated  Financial  Statements.  Accordingly,  all  measures  of  the  accumu-
lated  postretirement  benefit  obligation  or  net  periodic  postretirement  benefit  cost  presented  herein  do  not  reflect  the  potentially
positive  effects  of  the  Act  on  the  Company’s  postretirement  benefit  plans.

On  December 23,  2003,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards  Board  (FASB)  issued  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards
No.  132   (revised   2003), Employers’   Disclosures   about   Pensions   and   Other   Postretirement   Benefits.   This   Statement   revises
employers’  disclosures  about  pension  plans  and  other  postretirement  benefit  plans.  The  new  rules  require  additional  disclosures
about  the  assets,  obligations,  cash  flows,  and  net  periodic  benefit  cost  of  defined  benefit  pension  plans  and  other  postretirement
benefit  plans.

The  company  adopted  the  new  disclosure  requirements  at  December 31,  2003.

The  following  provides  a  reconciliation  of  benefit  obligation,  plan  assets,  and  funded  status  of  the  plans  (in  thousands):

Change in benefit obligations:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

Adjustment for plan assumed in acquisition

Service cost

Interest cost

Actuarial (gain) loss

Adjustment due to curtailment

Benefits paid

Benefit obligation at end of year

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of assets at beginning of year

Actual return (loss) on plan assets

Employer contributions

Benefits paid

Fair value of assets at end of year

7 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

Pension

Other
Retirement
Benefits

2003

2002

2003

2002

$3,067

$1,513

$3,483

$2,984

—

180

188

217

—

(89)

1,351

169

210

255

(415)

(16)

—

100

278

874

—

—

83

229

327

—

(170)

(140)

$3,563

$3,067

$4,565

$3,483

$ 953

$1,142

$ — $ —

214

341

(89)

(173)

—

(16)

—

170

—

139

(170)

(139)

$1,419

$ 953

$ — $ —

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Reconciliation of Funded Status:

Funded status

Unrecognized transition liability

Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss

Net amount recognized

Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:

Prepaid benefit cost

Accrued benefit cost

Accumulated other comprehensive income

Net amount recognized

Information for pension plans with an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets

Projected benefit obligation

Accumulated benefit obligation

Fair value of plan assets

Additional Information

Pension

Other
Retirement
Benefits

2003

2002

2003

2002

$(2,144)

$(2,114)

$(4,565)

$(3,483)

1,065

1,208

—

635

559

1,165

—

309

$ (444)

$ (347)

$(3,401)

$(3,174)

$ — $ — $ — $ —

(1,390)

(1,842)

(3,401)

946

1,495

—

—

$ (444)

$ (347)

$(3,401)

$(3,174)

Pension

2003

2002

$ 3,563

$ 3,067

2,809

2,795

$ 1,419

$ 953

Increase in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income

$

549

($1,495)

Pension
2002

2003

2001

Other
Retirement
Benefits
2002

2003

2001

Components of net periodic benefit cost:

Service cost

Interest cost

Expected return on plan assets

Amortization of transition liability

Amortization of prior service cost

Amortization of (gain) loss

Net periodic benefit cost

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for

December 31

Discount rate

Expected return on plan assets

Rate of compensation increase

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit

cost for December 31

Discount rate

Expected return on plan assets

Rate of compensation increase

$180

$169

$155

$100

$ 83

$104

191

210

(90)

(122)

143

143

—

14

23

—

91

(96)

—

23

(12)

278

229

210

—

—

—

19

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$438

$423

$161

$397

$312

$314

6.0% 6.75% 7.25%

6.0% 6.75% 7.5%

8.5% 8.5% 8.5%

3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

6.75% 7.25% 7.75%

6.75% 7.5% 7.5%

8.5% 8.5% 8.5%

3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

For   measurement   purposes,   a   weighted   average   5.8%   annual   rate   of   increase   in   the   per   capita   cost   of   covered   health   care
benefits  was  assumed  for  2003  and  thereafter.  The  Company  uses  a  December 31  measurement  date  for  its  plans.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

7 5

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Assumed health care cost trend rates

Health care cost trend rate assumed next year

Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

2003

2002

11.5% 11.5%

5.0%

5.0%

2010

2009

The   health   care   cost   trend   rate   assumption   has   an   effect   on   the   amounts   reported.   To   illustrate,   increasing   (decreasing)  the
assumed   health   care   cost   trend   rates   by   one   percentage   point   in   each   year   would   increase   (decrease)  the   aggregate   of   the
service   and   interest   cost   components   of   the   net   periodic   postretirement   benefit   cost   and   the   end   of   the   year   accumulated
postretirement  benefit  obligation  as  follows:

Effect on total of service and interest cost

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

Plan  Assets

1-Percentage
Point
Increase

1-Percentage
Point
Decrease

$ 48,017

$ 558,233

$ (41,520)

$(481,135)

The   Company’s   pension   plan   weighted-average   asset   allocations   at   December  31,   2003,   and   2002,   by   asset   category   are   as
follows:

Asset Category

Equity Securities

Debt Securities

Other

Total

Plan Assets
at December 31,
2002
2003

60.68% 55.07%

33.19% 40.48%

6.13%

4.45%

100.00% 100.00%

Cash  Flows  Contributions

The  Company  expects  to  contribute  $216,701  to  its  pension  plan  in  2004.

Estimated  Future  Benefit  Payments

The  following  benefit  payments,  which  reflect  expected  future  service,  as  appropriate,  are  expected  to  be  paid  (in  thousands):

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Years 2009-2013

Other
Retirement
Benefits

Pension

$ 22

$ 154

29

40

48

91

836

154

151

160

188

1,034

The  discount  rate  that  the  Company  uses  for  determining  future  pension  obligations  is  based  on  a  review  of  long-term  bonds,
including  published  indices.  The  discount  rate  determined  on  that  basis  decreased  from  6.75%  for  2002  to  6.00%  for  2003.  This
75  basis  point  decline  in  the  discount  rate  resulted  in  an  immaterial  increase  in  the  Company’s  U.S.  pension  plan  obligations.

For  2003,  the  Company  assumed  a  long-term  asset  rate  of  return  of  8.5%.  The  Company  will  also  utilize  an  8.5%  long-term  asset
rate  of  return  assumption  in  2004.  In  developing  the  8.5%  expected  long-term  rate  of  return  assumption,  the  Company  reviewed
the  asset  class  return  expectations  and  long-term  inflation  assumptions.  The  8.5%  long-term  asset  return  assumption  for  2004  is
based  on  an  asset  allocation  assumption  of  50%-75%  with  U.S.  and  international  equity  securities,  25%-45%  with  debt  securi-
ties,  and  0%-7%  with  other  securities  (primarily  cash  equivalents).  The  Company  believes  that  its  long-term  asset  allocation,  on
average,  will  approximate  the  targeted  allocation.  The  Company  regularly  reviews  its  actual  asset  allocation  and  may  periodically

7 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

rebalance   the   pension   plans’   investments   to   its   targeted   allocation   when   deemed   appropriate.   At   December  31,   2003,   the
Company’s  actual  asset  allocation  was  consistent  with  its  asset  allocation  assumption.

Employee  Bonus  Programs

The  Company  has  performance-based  bonus  programs  which  include  a  majority  of  non-union  employees.  Total  compensation  of
approximately  $2.5 million,  $2.1 million  and  $2.1 million  was  awarded  under  the  various  bonus  plans  in  2003,  2002  and  2001,
respectively.

401(k)  Plans  and  Profit  Sharing

The  Company  has  two  401(k)  plans  which  qualify  under  Section 401(k)  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  as  salary  reduction  plans.
Employees   may   elect   to   contribute   a   certain   percentage   of   their   salary   on   a   before-tax   basis.   Under   one   of   these   plans,   the
Company   matches   participants’   contributions   up   to   1.5%   of   the   participants’   salary.   Under   the   second   plan,   the   Company
matches   participants’   contributions   up   to   5.0%   of   the   participants’   salary.   The   Company’s   contributions   to   all   plans   in   2003,
2002  and  2001  were  approximately  $386,000,  $369,000  and  $307,000,  respectively.

As  required  by  provisions  within  the  Mexican  Constitution  and  Mexican  Labor  Laws,  the  Company’s  subsidiary,  FCCM,  provides  a
statutory  profit  sharing  benefit  to  its  employees.  In  accordance  with  these  laws,  FCCM  is  required  to  pay  to  its  employees  a  10%
share  of  its  profits  within  60 days  of  filing  corporate  income  tax  returns.  The  profit  sharing  basis  is  computed  under  a  section  of
the  Mexican  Income  Tax  Law  which,  in  general  terms,  differs  from  the income  tax  basis  by  excluding  the  inflation  adjustments  on
depreciation,  amortization,  receivables  and  payables.  Provisions  for  statutory  profit  sharing  expense  were  $477,000,  $388,000
and  $298,000  for  2003,  2002  and  2001,  respectively.

Additionally,   the   Company’s   Canadian   subsidiaries   administer   two   different   retirement   benefit   plans.   Both   plans   qualify   under
Section 146  of  the  federal  and  provincial  income  tax  law  and  are  Registered  Retirement  Savings  Plans  (RRSP).  Under  each  plan
employees   may   elect   to   contribute   a   certain   percentage   of   their   salary   on   a   pre-tax   basis.   Under   the   first   plan,   the   Company
matches  5%  of  gross  salary  up  to  a  maximum  of  $1,160  per  year.  Under  the  second  plan,  the  Company  matches  50%  of  the
employee’s   contribution   up   to   a   maximum   of   2%   of   gross   salary.   Company   contributions   were   approximately   $161,000,
$122,000  and  $80,000  for  the  years  2003,  2002  and  2001  respectively.

Postemployment  Benefits

The  Company  does  not  provide  any  other  significant  postemployment  benefits  to  its  employees.

14. INCOME  TAXES:

The  components  of  income  before  income  taxes  and  equity  earnings  are  as  follows  (in  thousands):

United States

Foreign (U.S.$)

2003

2002

2001

$23,054

$20,369

$ 7,615

5,591

4,225

8,772

$28,645

$24,594

$16,387

The  Company  files  consolidated  U.S.  federal  income  tax  returns  which  include  all  of  its  U.S.  subsidiaries.  Each  of  the  Company’s
foreign  subsidiaries  files  appropriate  income  tax  returns  in  their  respective  countries.  No  provision  is  made  for  the  U.S.  income
taxes  applicable  to  the  undistributed  earnings  of  controlled  foreign  subsidiaries  as  it  is  the  intention  of  management  to  fully  utilize
those  earnings  in  the  operations  of  the  foreign  subsidiaries.  If  the  earnings  were  to  be  distributed  in  the  future,  those  distributions
may  be  subject  to  U.S.  income  taxes  (appropriately  reduced  by  available  foreign  tax  credits)  and  withholding  taxes  payable  to
various  foreign  countries.  The  amount  of  undistributed  earnings  of  the  Company’s  controlled  foreign  subsidiaries  as  of  Decem-
ber 31,  2003  is  $45.9 million.  It  is  not  practicable  to  determine  the  amount  of  U.S.  income  and  foreign  withholding  taxes  that
could  be  payable  if  a  distribution  of  earnings  were  to  occur.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

7 7

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The  components  of  the  provision  for  income  taxes  are  as  follows  (in  thousands):

United States:

Current —

Federal

State

Deferred

Foreign (U.S.$):

Current

Deferred

Total

2003

2002

2001

$

154

$ 643

$ 681

27

226

85

8,976

7,191

2,228

9,157

8,060

2,994

626

784

1,388

(687)

1,236

1,936

1,410

701

3,172

$10,567

$8,761

$6,166

The  provision  for  income  taxes  differs  from  that  which  would  be  computed  by  applying  the  statutory  U.S.  federal  income  tax  rate
to  income  before  taxes.  The  following  is  a  summary  of  the  effective  tax  rate  reconciliation:

Tax provision at statutory rate

Effect of foreign operations

State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

Change in valuation allowance

Other, net

Effective income tax rate

2003

2002

2001

34.0% 34.0%

34.0%

(1.7%)

(3.0%)

3.3%

3.9%

3.2%

1.9%

(0.0%)

(0.0%)

(2.0%)

1.3%

0.7%

0.5%

36.9% 35.6%

37.6%

Deferred  income  taxes  reflect  the  net  income  tax  effects  of  temporary  differences  between  the  carrying  amounts  of  assets  and
liabilities  for  financial  reporting  purposes  and  the  amounts  used  for  income  tax  purposes  as  well  as  available  income  tax  credits.
The  components  of  net  deferred  income  taxes  are  as  follows  (in  thousands):

Deferred tax benefits —

Accruals and reserves not deducted for tax purposes until paid

Alternative minimum tax credits

Net operating losses

Interest rate swaps

Postretirement benefits

Deferred tax obligations —

Property and investment basis differences

Other

Valuation allowance

Net deferred tax obligations

2003

2002

$ 3,010

$ 2,184

0

6,691

715

860

270

7,432

641

345

11,276

10,872

(49,801)

(39,541)

(54)

(251)

(83)

(450)

$(38,830)

$(29,202)

In  the  accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheets,  these  deferred  benefits  and  deferred  obligations  are  classified  as  current  or
non-current  based  on  the  classification  of  the  related  asset  or  liability  for  financial  reporting.  A  deferred  tax  obligation  or  benefit
that   is   not   related   to   an   asset   or   liability   for   financial   reporting,   including   deferred   tax   assets   related   to   carryforwards,   are
classified  according  to  the  expected  reversal  date  of  the  temporary  difference  as  of  the  end  of  the  year.

The   Company   had   net   operating   loss   carry-forwards   from   its   Mexican   operations   in   2003   and   2002   of   $19.8  million   and
$21.2 million,  respectively.  The  Mexican  losses,  for  income  tax  purposes,  relate  to  the  immediate  deduction  of a  portion  of the
purchase  price  paid  for  the  FCCM  operations  and  interest  expense  incurred  in  the  holding  company,  Servicios.  These  loss  carry-

7 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

forwards  will  expire  between  2009  and  2013.  The  Company  had  net  operating  loss  carry-forwards  from  its  Canadian  operations
as   of   December  31,   2003   and   2002   of   $0.8  million   and   $1.1  million,   respectively.   The   Canadian   losses   represent   losses
generated  prior  to  the  Company  gaining  control  of  those  operations  in  April 1999.  These  loss  carry-forwards  will  expire  in  2004.

A  significant  portion  of  the  deferred  tax  benefits  relate  to  the  Mexican  net  operating  loss  carryforwards.  The  Company  believes
that  a  valuation  allowance  need  not  be  recorded  since  its  Mexican business  will  generate  sufficient taxable income  to  utilize  all  of
the  deferred  tax  assets.  The  Company’s  Mexican  railroad  operations  are  currently  profitable  and  at  current  levels  will  generate
sufficient taxable income  to  utilize  the  net  operating  loss  carry-forwards  attributable  to  the  FCCM  business  prior  to  the  date  of
expiration.  In  addition,  Management  believes  that  a  restructuring  of  the  Mexican  business  will  enable  the  Company  to  use  the
future  taxable  income  to  offset  any  remaining  net  operating  losses  prior  to  the  date  of  expiration.

As   of   December  31,   2003   and   2002,   the   deferred   tax   asset   attributable   to   the   Canadian   net   operating   loss   carry-forward   had
been fully offset  by  a  valuation  allowance  of  $251,000  and  $450,000,  respectively.  In  2003,  the  valuation  allowance  decreased
approximately   $199,000   due   to   a   review   by   the   tax   authorities   and   the   subsequent   agreement   on   utilization   of   some   of   the
losses.  Management  does  not  anticipate  that  the  Company  will  generate  sufficient  future  taxable  income,  in  amount  or  character,
to   utilize   the   remaining   losses   prior   to   expiration.   The   valuation   allowance   was   established   in   the   acquisition   of   GRO,   and
accordingly,  if  reversed  will  result  in  a  decrease  to  goodwill.

15. GRANTS  FROM  GOVERNMENTAL  AGENCIES:

The  Company  periodically  receives  grants  from  federal,  state  and  local  agencies  in  the  U.S.  and  provinces  in  Canada  in  which  it
operates  for  rehabilitation  or  construction  of  track.  These  grants  typically  reimburse  the  Company  for  75%  to  100%  of  the  total
cost  of  specific  projects.  Under  such  grant  programs,  the  Company  received  $2.0 million,  $8.8 million  and  $4.0 million  in  2003,
2002  and  2001,  respectively.

None  of  the  Company’s  grants  represent  a  future  liability  of  the  Company  unless  the  Company  abandons  the  rehabilitated  or  new
track   structure   within   a   specified   period   of   time   or   fails   to   maintain   the   rehabilitated   or   new   track   to   certain   standards   and   to
make  certain  minimum  capital  improvements,  as  defined  in  the  respective  agreements.  As  the  Company  intends  to  comply  with
these   agreements,   the   Company   has   recorded   additions   to   road   property   and   has   deferred   the   amount   of   the   grants   as   the
construction   and   rehabilitation   expenditures   have   been   incurred.   The   amortization   of   deferred   grants   is   a   non-cash   offset   to
depreciation  expense  over  the  useful  lives  of  the  related  assets  and  is  not  included  as  taxable  income.  During  the  years  ended
December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001,  the  Company  recorded  offsets  to  depreciation  expense  from  grant  amortization  of  $2.1 mil-
lion,  $1.8 million  and  $1.4 million,  respectively.

16. COMMITMENTS  AND  CONTINGENCIES:

The  Company  is  a  defendant  in  certain  lawsuits  resulting  from  railroad  and  industrial  switching  operations.  Management  believes
that  the  Company  has  adequate  provisions  in  the  financial  statements  for  any  expected  liabilities  which  may  result  from  disposi-
tion  of  such  lawsuits.  While  it  is  possible  that  some  of  the  foregoing  matters  may  be  resolved  at  a  cost  greater  than  that  provided
for,  it  is  the  opinion  of  management  that  the  ultimate  liability,  if  any,  will  not  be  material  to  the  Company’s  results  of  operations  or
financial  position.

On  August 6,  1998,  a  lawsuit  was  commenced  against  the  Company  and  its  subsidiary,  Illinois  &  Midland  Railroad,  Inc.  (IMRR),
by  Commonwealth  Edison  Company  (ComEd)  in  the  Circuit  Court  of  Cook  County,  Illinois  and  the  Company  countersued  alleging
a  breach  of  the  IMRR’s  perpetual  railroad  exclusivity  included  in  a  Service  Assurance  Agreement  (SAA) between  the  IMRR  and
Com   Ed.   On   July  23,   2003   the   parties   to   the   lawsuit   entered   into   a   settlement   agreement.   Under   the   terms   of   the   settlement
agreement,  both  parties’  appeals  were  dismissed  and  the  parties  amended  and  restated  the  Service  Assurance  Agreement  (the
ARSAA)  (See  Note  6).  Due  to  the  specified  term  contained  in  the  ARSAA  rather  than  a  perpetual  term  which  existed  in  the  SAA,
the  Company  began  amortizing  the  ARSAA  in  July  2003.  The  Company  has  concluded  that  there  is  a  high  probability  that  the
IMRR’s  customer  relationship  with  the  power  plant  will  continue  beyond  the  current  term  of  the  ARSAA,  and  the  Company  has
based  its  estimate  of  the  useful  life  of  the  ARSAA  asset  on  its  estimate  of  the  useful  life  of  the  coal-fired  electricity  generation
plant,   which   the   Company   estimates   will   be   in   service   through   2027.   As   a   result   of   this   settlement   agreement,   the   Company
recorded  a  non-cash  after-tax  charge  to  net  income  of  $442,000  in  the  third  quarter  of  2003.  Future  annual  amortization  related
to  the  ARSAA  is  $431,000  pre-tax.

17. STOCK-BASED  COMPENSATION  PLANS:

In  1996,  the  Company  established  an  incentive  and  nonqualified  stock  option  plan  for  key  employees  and  a  nonqualified  stock
option   plan   for   non-employee   directors   (the   Stock   Option   Plans).   The   Company   accounts   for   these   plans   under   APB   Opinion
No. 25,  under  which  no  compensation  cost  has  been  recognized,  except  for  $200,000  of  compensation  expense  related  to  the
immediate  repurchase  of  shares  issued  upon  exercise  of  certain  stock  options  in  2001.  Had  compensation  cost  for  all  options

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

7 9

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

issued  under  these  plans  been  determined  consistent  with  FASB  Statement  No. 123,  the  Company’s  net  income  and  earnings  per
share  would  have  been  reduced  as  follows  (in  thousands,  except  EPS):

Net Income: As reported

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based

methods for all awards, net of related tax effects

Pro Forma

Basic EPS: As reported

Pro Forma

Diluted EPS: As reported

Pro Forma

2003

2002

2001

$28,719

$25,607

$19,084

(1,380)

(980)

(777)

27,339

24,627

18,307

$ 1.21

$ 1.11

$ 1.15

1.15

1.07

1.10

$ 1.07

$ 0.97

$ 0.98

1.02

0.94

0.95

The  Company  has  reserved  4,972,500  Class A  shares  for  option  grants  under  the  Stock  Option  Plans.  The  Compensation  and
Stock   Option   Committee   of   the   Company’s   Board   of   Directors   has   discretion   to   determine   employee   grantees,   dates   and
amounts  of  grants,  vesting  and  expiration  dates.  Some  awards  under  the  director’s  plan  are  automatic  upon  becoming  a  director
and/or  the  first  and  second  anniversaries  of  being  a  director,  and  the  Board  of  Directors  may  make  other  awards  under  this  plan.
Under   both   Plans,   the   exercise   price   must   equal   at   least   100%   of   the   stock’s   market   price   on   the   date   of   grant   and   must   be
exercised  within  five  years,  or  ten  years  for  directors,  from  the  date  of  grant.  The  following  is  a  summary  of  stock  option  activity
for  years  ended:

2003

Wtd. Ave.
Exercise
Price

Shares

December 31,
2002

Wtd. Ave.
Exercise
Price

Shares

2001

Wtd. Ave.
Exercise
Price

Shares

Outstanding at beginning of year

1,890,246

$ 7.75

1,934,739

$ 5.55

2,580,078

$5.15

Granted

Exercised

Forfeited

495,195

14.86

498,825

14.22

509,966

(549,639)

(47,346)

5.02

9.72

(523,530)

(19,788)

Outstanding at end of year

1,788,456

10.51

1,890,246

Exercisable at end of year

600,420

Weighted average fair value of options granted

702,306

6.88

8.17

The  following  table  summarizes  information  about  stock  options  outstanding  at  December 31,  2003:

Exercise Price

$ 2.15 - $ 4.30

4.31 -

6.46 -

6.45

8.60

8.61 - 10.75

10.76 - 12.90

12.91 - 15.05

15.06 - 17.20

Number of
Options

161,691

278,229

327,140

43,875

3,375

953,678

20,468

2.15 - 17.20

1,788,456

Options Outstanding
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life

Options Exercisable

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Number of
Options

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

1.0 Years

1.7 years

2.4 years

2.7 years

7.6 years

4.1 years

5.8 years

3.1 Years

$ 3.04

4.69

7.15

9.85

11.78

15.53

15.89

10.51

144,816

189,492

124,328

21,938

2,250

117,596

—

600,420

$ 2.97

4.73

7.17

9.85

11.78

14.22

—

6.88

8 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

(1,112,142)

(43,163)

1,934,739

700,466

5.80

6.97

7.75

4.97

8.02

7.63

5.59

4.85

5.55

5.18

4.19

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The   fair   value   of   each   option   grant   is   estimated   on   the   date   of   grant   using   the   Black-Scholes   option   pricing   model   with   the
following  weighted-average  assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate

Expected dividend yield

Expected lives in years

Expected volatility

2003

2002

2001

3.35%

0.00%

5.00

4.46%

0.00%

5.00

4.50%

0.00%

4.91

60.01% 61.51% 58.11%

In  addition  to  the  Stock  Option  Plans,  the  Company  has  reserved  843,750  shares  of  Class A  common  stock  it  may  sell  to  its  full-
time  employees  under  its  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan  (ESPP).  At  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001,  44,875  shares,  40,841
shares,   and   37,803   shares,   respectively,   had   been   purchased   under   this   plan.   On   May  29,   2003,   the   Company   amended   and
restated  the  ESPP  so  that  the  Company  may  sell  its  reserved  shares  of  Class A  common  stock  to  its  full-time  employees  at  90%
of  the  stock’s  market  price  at  date  of  purchase.  Prior  to  amendment  and  restatement  of  the  ESPP,  the  Company  sold  shares  at
100%  of  the  stock’s  market  price  at  date  of  purchase.  In  accordance  with  Internal  Revenue  Code,  no  compensation  cost  exists
for  this  plan.

18. BUSINESS  SEGMENT  AND  GEOGRAPHIC  AREA  INFORMATION:

The  Company  historically  reported  two  similar  business  segments:  North  American  Railroad  Operations,  which  includes  operating
short  line  and  regional  railroads,  and  Industrial  Switching,  which  included  providing  freight  car  switching  and  related  services  to
industrial  companies  with  railroad  facilities  within  their  complexes  in  the  United  States.  Effective  January 1,  2003,  the  Company
has  changed  its  reporting  to  reflect  one  reportable  business  segment:  North  American Operations.  This  reporting  change  follows
a  change  in  internal  structure  wherein  the  Chief  Operating  Decision  Maker  now  views  Industrial  Switching  as  part  of  a  significant
operating   region   comprised   of   multiple   railroad   operations.   The   Company   has   various   operating   regions   which   represent   its
various  railroad  lines.  However,  each  line  has  similar  characteristics  so  they  have  been  aggregated  into  one  segment.

Operating Revenues:

United States

Canada

Mexico

Geographic  Area  Data

2003

Percent

For the Years Ended
Percent

2002

2001

Percent

$175,650

37,538

31,639

71.7%

15.3%

13.0%

148,570

32,150

28,820

70.9%

15.3%

13.8%

$115,171

29,546

28,859

66.4%

17.0%

16.6%

100%

Total operating revenues

$244,827

100% $209,540

100%

$173,576

Long-lived assets located in:

United States

Canada

Mexico

Total long-lived assets

2003

As of December 31,
Percent

2002

$453,089

82.8% $348,989

55,746

38,146

10.2%

7.0%

45,706

39,210

$546,981

100% $433,905

Percent

80.4%

10.5%

9.1%

100%

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

8 1

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

19. QUARTERLY  FINANCIAL  DATA  (Unaudited):

Quarterly  Results

(in thousands, except per share data)

2003

Operating revenues

Income from continuing operations

Net income

Diluted earnings per share

2002

Operating revenues

Income from continuing operations

Net income

Diluted earnings per share

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

$58,862

$62,937

$61,499

$61,529

7,987

5,534

0.21

10,862

7,695

0.29

9,205

7,618

0.29

8,251

7,871

0.29

$48,297

$52,075

$53,001

$56,167

6,540

5,388

0.21

8,364

7,435

0.28

7,322

7,025

0.27

9,781

5,759

0.22

The   fourth   quarter   of   2002   includes   a   $2.8  million   pre-tax   gain   on   the   sale   of   rail   assets   and   a   $375,000   non-cash   after-tax
charge  for  unamortized  finance  fees  resulting  from  the  early  extinguishment  of  debt.

20. COMPREHENSIVE  INCOME:

Comprehensive  income  is  the  total  of  net  income  and  all  other  non-owner  changes  in  equity.  The  following  table  sets  forth  the
Company’s  comprehensive  income  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001  (in  thousands):

Net income

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustments

Transition adjustment related to change in accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities,

net of benefit of $153

Net change in unrealized losses on qualifying cash flow hedges, net of tax provision (benefit) of $25,

($406) and ($286), respectively

Net change in unrealized losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of Australian Railroad Group, net of tax

provision (benefit) of $1,124 and ($2,493) respectively

Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of benefit of $42 and $306 respectively

Comprehensive income

2003

2002

2001

$28,719

$25,607

$19,084

23,498

2,514

708

—

43

—

(255)

(732)

(475)

2,623

(72)

(5,818)

(552)

—

—

$54,811

$21,019

$19,062

The   following   table   sets   forth   the   components   of   accumulated   other   comprehensive   income   (loss),   net   of   tax,   included   in   the
consolidated  balance  sheets  as  of  December 31,  2003  and  2002  (in  thousands):

Net foreign currency translation adjustments

Net unrealized minimum pension liability adjustment, net of benefit of $378 and $306 respectively

Net unrealized losses on qualifying cash flow hedges, net of benefit of $1,921 and $3,045, respectively

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of benefit of $2,299 and $3,351, respectively

2003

2002

$21,839

$(1,660)

(624)

(552)

(4,616)

(7,281)

$16,599

$(9,493)

8 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

21. RECENTLY  ISSUED  ACCOUNTING  STANDARDS:

The   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board   (FASB)  recently   issued   the   following   Statements   of   Financial   Accounting   Standards
(SFAS):

FASB  145 —  ‘‘Rescission  of  FASB  Statements  No. 4,  44,  and  64,  Amendment  of  FASB  Statement  No. 13,  and  Technical
Corrections.’’

Under  SFAS  No. 145,  FASB  Statement  No. 4,  Reporting  Gains  and  Losses  from  Extinguishment  of  Debt,  and  an  amendment  of
that  Statement,  and  FASB  Statement  No. 64,  Extinguishments  of  Debt  Made  to  Satisfy  Sinking-Fund  Requirements  are  rescinded.
This  Statement  also  rescinds  FASB  Statement  No. 44,  Accounting  for  Intangible  Assets  of  Motor  Carriers.  This  Statement  amends
FASB   Statement   No.  13,   Accounting   for   Leases,   to   eliminate   an   inconsistency   between   the   required   accounting   for   sale-
leaseback  transactions  and  the  required  accounting  for  certain  lease  modifications  that  have  economic  effects  that  are  similar  to
sale-leaseback  transactions.  This  Statement  also  amends  other  existing  authoritative  pronouncements  to  make  various  technical
corrections,  clarify  meanings,  or  describe  their  applicability  under  changed  conditions.  SFAS  No. 145  was  issued  in  April 2002
and  the  provisions  of  this  Statement  related  to  the  rescission  of  Statement  4  shall  be  effective  for  the  fiscal  years  beginning  after
May 15,  2002.  All  other  provisions  of  this  Statement  shall  be  effective  for  financial  statements  issued  on  or  after  May 15,  2002
with   early   adoption   permitted.   The   most   significant   change   related   to   the   reporting   of   losses   associated   with   the   write-off   of
deferred  financing  costs  which  are  currently  reported  as  extraordinary.  The  Company  adopted  this  statement  and  adjusted  the
Company’s  financial  statements.

FASB  146 —  ‘‘Accounting  for  Costs  Associated  with  Exit  or  Disposal  Activities’’

Under  SFAS  No. 146,  costs  associated  with  exit  or  disposal  activities  are  required  to  be  recorded  at  their  fair  values  only  once  a
liability   exists.   Under   previous   guidance,   certain   exit   costs   were   accrued   when   management   committed   to   an   exit   plan,   which
may  have  been  before  an  actual  liability  arose.  Liabilities  recognized  prior  to  the  initial  application  of  FAS  146  should  continue  to
be  accounted  for  in  accordance  with  EITF  94-3  or  other  applicable  pre-existing  guidance.  SFAS  No. 146  was  issued  in  June 2002
and   is   effective   for   fiscal   years   beginning   January  1,   2003   (with   earlier   application   encouraged).   The   Company   adopted   this
statement  and  it  had  no  impact  on  the  Company’s  financial  statements.

FASB  149 —  ‘‘Amendment  of  Statement  133  on  Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities’’

This   Statement   amends   and   clarifies   financial   accounting   and   reporting   for   derivative   instruments,   including   certain   derivative
instruments  embedded  in  other  contracts  (collectively  referred  to  as  derivatives)  and  for  hedging  activities  under  FASB  Statement
No.  133,   Accounting   for   Derivative   Instruments   and   Hedging   Activities.   In   particular,   this   Statement   (1)  clarifies   under   what
circumstances   a   contract   with   an   initial   net   investment   meets   the   characteristic   of   a   derivative   discussed   in   paragraph   6(b)   of
Statement   133,   (2)  clarifies   when   a   derivative   contains   a   financing   component,   (3)  amends   the   definition   of   an   underlying   to
conform  it  to  language  used  in  FASB  Interpretation  No. 45,  ‘‘Guarantor’s  Accounting  and  Disclosure  Requirements  for  Guaran-
tees,  Including  Indirect  Guarantees  of  Indebtedness  of  Others’’,  and  (4)  amends  certain  other  existing  pronouncements.  These
changes   are   intended   to   result   in   more   consistent   reporting   of   contracts   as   either   derivatives   or   hybrid   instruments.   This
Statement  is  effective  for  contracts  entered  into  or  modified  after  June 30,  2003  and  all  provisions  of  this  Statement  should  be
applied  prospectively.  The  Company  adopted  this  statement  and  it  had  no  impact  on  the  Company’s  financial  statements.

FASB  150 —  ‘‘Accounting  for  Certain  Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics  of  both  Liabilities  and  Equity’’

This   Statement   requires   that   certain   financial   instruments,   which   under   previous   guidance   were   accounted   for   as   equity,   must
now   be   accounted   for   as   liabilities.   The   financial   instruments   affected   include   mandatorily   redeemable   stock,   certain   financial
instruments   that   require   or   may   require   the   issuer   to   buy   back   some   of   its   shares   in   exchange   for   cash   or   other   assets,   and
certain  obligations  that  can  be  settled  with  shares  of  stock.  SFAS  No. 150  is  effective  for  all  financial  instruments  entered  into  or
modified   after   May  31,   2003   and   must   be   applied   to   the   Company’s   existing   financial   instruments   effective   July  1,   2003,   the
beginning   of   the   first   fiscal   period   after   June  15,   2003.   The   Company   adopted   this   statement   and   it   had   no   impact   on   the
Company’s  financial  statements.

Interpretation  No. 45,  Guarantor’s  Accounting  and  Disclosure  Requirements  for  Guarantees,  Including  Indirect  Guar-
antees  of  Indebtedness  to  Others

In   November  2002,   the   FASB   issued   Interpretation   No.  45,   (FIN)  Guarantor’s   Accounting   and   Disclosure   Requirements   for
Guarantees,  Including  Indirect  Guarantees  of  Indebtedness  to  Others,  which  address  the  disclosure  to  be  made  by  a  guarantor  in
its   interim   and   annual   financial   statements   about   its   obligations   under   guarantees.   FIN   45   also   requires   the   guarantor   to
recognize  a  liability  for  the  non-contingent  component  of  the  guarantee,  which  is  the  obligation  to  stand  ready  to  perform  in  the
event  that  specified  triggering  events  or  conditions  occur.  The  recognition  and  measurement  provisions  of  FIN  45  are  effective  for
all  guarantees  entered  into  or  modified  after  December 31,  2002.  The  Company  did  not  enter  into  such  transactions.  Therefore
the  adoption  of  this  standard  did  not  impact  its  consolidated  financial  position,  results  of  operations,  or  disclosure  requirements.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

8 3

GENESEE & WYOMING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Interpretation  No. 46,  Consolidation  of  Variable  Interest  Entities,  an  interpretation  of  Accounting  Research  Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51.

In  January 2003,  the  FASB  issued  FIN  46,  Consolidation  of  Variable  Interest  Entities,  an  interpretation  of  Accounting  Research
Bulletin   (ARB)  No.  51.   FIN   46   addresses   consolidation   by   business   enterprises   of   variable   interest   entities   created   after   Janu-
ary  31,   2003   and   to   variable   interest   entities   in   which   an   enterprise   obtains   an   interest   after   that   date.   It   applies   in   the   first
reporting   period   after   December  15,   2003,   to   variable   interest   entities   in   which   an   enterprise   holds   a   variable   interest   that   it
acquired   before   February  1,   2003.   In   December  2003,   the   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board,   issued   revisions   to   FASB
Interpretation  46,  resulting  in  multiple  effective  dates  based  on  the  characteristics  as  well  as  the  creation  dates  of  the  variable
interest  entities,  however  with  no  effective  date  later  than  the  Company’s  first  quarter  of  2004.  The  Company  does  not  believe
that  adoption  of  this  statement  will  have  a  material  effect  on  its  consolidated  financial  statements.

22. SUBSEQUENT  EVENT:

On  February 11,  2004,  the  Company  announced  a  three-for-two  common  stock  split  in  the  form  of  50%  stock  dividends  to  be
distributed  on  March 15,  2004  to  stockholders  of  record  as  of  February 27,  2004.  All  share,  per  share  and  par  value  amounts
presented  herein  have  been  restated  to  reflect  the  retroactive  effect  of  the  stock  split.

8 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To  the  Board  of  Directors  and  Stockholders  of
Australian  Railroad  Group  Pty  Ltd

We   have   audited   the   accompanying   consolidated   balance   sheets   of   Australian   Railroad   Group   Pty   Ltd   and   subsidiaries   as   of
December  31,   2003   and   2002   and   the   related   consolidated   statements   of   income,   stockholders’   equity   and   comprehensive
income   and   cash   flows   for   the   three   years   ended   December  31,   2003,   2002   and   2001.   These   financial   statements   are   the
responsibility  of  the  Company’s  management.  Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  these  financial  statements  based  on
our  audits.

We  conducted  our  audits  in  accordance  with  auditing  standards  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States.  Those  standards  require
that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about  whether  the  financial  statements  are  free  of  material
misstatement.   An   audit   includes   examining,   on   a   test   basis,   evidence   supporting   the   amounts   and   disclosures   in   the   financial
statements.  An  audit  also  includes  assessing  the  accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as
well   as   evaluating   the   overall   financial   statement   presentation.   We   believe   that   our   audit   provides   a   reasonable   basis   for   our
opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the  financial  statements  referred  to  above  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  consolidated  financial  position
of   Australian   Railroad   Group   Pty   Ltd   and   subsidiaries   at   December  31,   2003   and   2002   and   the   consolidated   results   of   their
operations  and  their  cash  flows  for  the  three  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001,  in  conformity  with  accounting
principles  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States.

Ernst & Young

Perth, Western Australia
February 6, 2004

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

8 5

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AT DECEMBER 31, 2003 and 2002

ASSETS

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Accounts receivable, net

Materials and supplies, net

Prepaid expenses and other

Total current assets

INVESTMENTS

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net

RESTRICTED CASH

DEFERRED INCOME TAX ASSETS

OTHER ASSETS, net

Total assets

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Interest bearing liabilities

Accounts payable

Accrued expenses

Provision for employee entitlements

Current income tax liabilities

Deferred income tax liabilities

Total current liabilities

LONG-TERM DEBT

OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES

FAIR VALUE OF INTEREST RATE SWAPS

SUBORDINATED STOCKHOLDERS’ LOANS

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Total non-current liabilities

REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK OF THE STOCKHOLDERS

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock, no par value, 92,000,002 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002

Retained earnings

Accumulated other comprehensive income

Total stockholders’ equity

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

8 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

2003

2002

$000 USD

$ 26,618

$

5,882

47,764

10,033

3,069

30,315

7,985

2,061

87,484

46,243

2,743

—

478,808

402,286

—

80,193

2,733

53,380

10,592

4,224

$651,961

$516,725

$

— $133,263

7,199

30,177

4,934

—

2,536

8,784

16,418

4,161

1,672

71

44,846

164,369

367,892

195,039

2,031

11,735

9,133

11,562

1,031

2,427

16,621

8,642

402,353

223,760

16,212

11,807

79,029

65,401

44,120

79,029

44,658

(6,898)

188,550

116,789

$651,961

$516,725

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

OPERATING REVENUES

OPERATING EXPENSES

Transportation

Maintenance of ways and structures

Maintenance of equipment

General and administrative

Net gain on sale of assets

Asset impairment write down

Depreciation and amortization

Write-off of unsuccessful bid costs

Total operating expenses

INCOME FROM OPERATIONS

INTEREST INCOME

INTEREST EXPENSE

Income before Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes

Net Income

2003

2002
$000 USD

2001

$249,571

$211,067

$188,490

76,747

35,514

26,057

34,676

(2,081)

—

63,746

27,680

23,187

32,239

(1,647)

1,333

23,443

17,191

—

867

60,328

23,622

20,301

21,852

(152)

—

13,392

1,752

194,356

164,596

141,095

55,215

3,271

46,471

47,395

886

596

(33,877)

(24,859)

(22,505)

24,609

(3,866)

22,498

25,486

(5,524)

(8,584)

$ 20,743

$ 16,974

$ 16,902

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

8 7

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

BALANCE, December 31, 2000

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Net income

Currency translation adjustment

Transition adjustment related to the change in accounting for

derivative instruments

Impact of cash flow hedges on other comprehensive income

Fair market value adjustments of cash flow hedges

Comprehensive income

Common
Stock

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

$ 71,344

$ 10,782

$

2,234

$ 84,360

—

—

—

—

—

16,902

—

—

—

—

—

—

(9,974)

(3,587)

(5,622)

2,442

—

16,902

(9,974)

(3,587)

(5,622)

2,442

161

7,685

Issuance of 18,000,000 shares of common stock

7,685

BALANCE, December 31, 2001

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Net income

Currency translation adjustment

Impact of cash flow hedges on other comprehensive income

Fair market value adjustments of cash flow hedges

Comprehensive income

BALANCE, December 31, 2002

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Net income

Currency translation adjustment

Impact of cash flow hedges on other comprehensive income

Fair market value adjustments of cash flow hedges

Comprehensive income

BALANCE, December 31, 2003

$ 79,029

$ 27,684

$ (14,507)

$ 92,206

—

—

—

—

—

16,974

—

—

—

—

—

12,477

(8,472)

3,604

—

16,974

12,477

(8,472)

3,604

24,583

$ 79,029

$ 44,658

$ (6,898)

$ 116,789

—

—

—

—

—

20,743

—

—

—

—

—

45,776

10,139

(4,897)

—

20,743

45,776

10,139

(4,897)

71,761

$ 79,029

$ 65,401

$ 44,120

$ 188,550

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

8 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation

Amortization

Gain on sale of assets

Asset impairment write down

Deferred income taxes

Amortization and write off of deferred finance charges

Changes in assets and liabilities Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other

Materials and supplies

Accounts payable, provisions, accrued expenses and other

Net cash provided by operating activities

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchase of property and equipment

Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

Transfer from (to) restricted cash

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from issue of shares

Repayment of subordinated stockholders’ loans

Refund of goods and services tax

Proceeds from debt

Repayments of debt

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash

equivalents

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year

CASH PAID DURING YEAR FOR:

Interest

Income taxes

2003

2002
$000 USD

2001

$ 20,743

$ 16,974

$ 16,902

18,914

4,529

(2,081)

—

11,283

4,953

(9,008)

13,769

3,422

(1,647)

1,333

3,665

2,155

10,139

3,253

(152)

—

7,252

1,860

(379)

(14,164)

573

1,203

(197)

(4,613)

(10,722)

16,505

45,293

29,773

41,398

(35,774)

(28,423)

(54,358)

6,924

69,978

1,752

152

(46,957)

(6,351)

41,128

(73,628)

(60,557)

—

—

—

—

—

—

360,493

38,990

7,685

(7,685)

16,457

20,452

(430,385)

—

(16,360)

(69,892)

38,990

20,549

4,207

839

(553)

20,736

5,882

(4,026)

9,908

837

9,071

$ 26,618

$ 5,882

$ 9,908

$ 32,817

$ 22,704

$ 20,645

4,096

1,647

—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

8 9

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

Australian   Railroad   Group   Pty   Ltd   (the   Company)   is   jointly   owned   by   Genesee   &   Wyoming   Inc   (GWI)  and   Wesfarmers   Ltd
(Wesfarmers)  with  each  partner  holding  a  50%  interest.

The  principal  activity  of  the  Company  during  the  year  was  to  provide  rail  freight  transport  and  ancillary  logistics  services  to  the
mining  and  agricultural  industries  and  to  the  general  freight  market  within  Western  Australia  and  South  Australia.  There  was  no
significant  change  in  the  nature  of  these  activities  during  this  period.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis  of  Preparation

The  consolidated  financial  statements  of  the  Company  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America.

Principles  of  Consolidation

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  Australian  Railroad  Group  Pty  Ltd  and  its  wholly  owned  subsidiar-
ies.  All  intercompany  transactions  and  accounts  have  been  eliminated.

Revenue  Recognition

Due   to   the   relatively   short   length   of   haul,   revenues   are   estimated   and   recognized   as   shipments   initially   move   onto   the   tracks.
Other  service  revenues  are  recognized  as  such  services  are  provided.

Cash  Equivalents

The   Company   considers   all   highly   liquid   instruments   with   maturity   of   three   months   or   less   when   purchased   to   be   cash
equivalents.

Materials  and  Supplies

Materials  and  supplies  consist  of  purchased  items  for  improvement  and  maintenance  of  railroad  property  and  equipment,  and  are
stated  at  the  lower  of  cost  or  market  value,  computed  on  a  first-in-first-out  basis.

Investments

Investments  comprise  the  Company’s  interest  in  Asia  Pacific  Transport  Consortium  (APTC).  This  is  held  at  cost.

Property  and  Equipment

Property   and   equipment   are   carried   at   historical   cost.   Acquired   railroad   property   is   recorded   at   the   purchased   cost.   Major
renewals  or  betterments  are  capitalized  while  routine  maintenance  and  repairs  are  charged  to  expenses  when  incurred.  Gains  or
losses  on  sales  or  other  dispositions  are  credited  or  charged  to  operating  expenses  upon  disposition.  Depreciation  is  provided  on
the  straight-line  method  over  the  useful  lives  of  the  railroad  property  (20-30 years),  equipment  (3-20 years)  and  lease  premium
(49 years).  The  Company  continually  evaluates  whether  events  and  circumstances  have  occurred  that  indicate  that  its  long-lived
assets   may   not   be   recoverable.   When   factors   indicate   that   assets   should   be   evaluated   for   possible   impairment,   the   Company
uses  an  estimate  of  the  related  undiscounted  future  cash  flows  over  the  remaining  lives  of  assets  in  measuring  whether  or  not
impairment  has  occurred.  If  impairment  is  identified,  a  loss  would  be  reported  to  the  extent  that  the  carrying  value  of  the  related
assets  exceeds  the  fair  value  of  those  assets  as  determined  by  valuation  techniques  available  in  the  circumstances.

Disclosures  About  Fair  Value  of  Financial  Instruments

The  following  methods  and  assumptions  were  used  to  estimate  the  fair  value  of  each  class  of  financial  instrument  held  by  the
Company:

Current  assets  and  current  liabilities:  The  carrying  value  approximates  fair  value  due  to  the  short  maturity  of  these  items.

Long-term  debt:  The  fair  value  of  the  Company’s  long-term  debt  is  based  on  secondary  market  indicators.  Since  the  Company’s
debt  is  not  quoted,  estimates  are  based  on  each  obligation’s  characteristics,  including  remaining  maturities,  interest  rate,  credit
rating,  collateral,  amortization  schedule  and  liquidity.  The  carrying  amount  approximates  fair  value.

9 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities

SFAS  No. 133  ‘‘Accounting  for  Derivatives  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities’’  requires  all  contracts  that  meet  the  definition  of  a
derivative  to  be  recognized  on  the  balance  sheet  as  either  assets  or  liabilities  and  recorded  at  fair  value.  Gains  or  losses  arising
from   remeasuring   derivatives   to   fair   value   each   period   are   to   be   accounted   for   either   in   the   income   statement   or   in   other
comprehensive  income,  depending  on  the  use  of  the  derivative  and  whether  it  qualifies  for  hedge  accounting.  The  key  criterion
that  must  be  met  in  order  to  qualify  for  hedge  accounting  is  that  the  derivative  must  be  highly  effective  in  offsetting  the  change  in
the  fair  value  or  cash  flows  of  the  hedged  item.  See  footnote 6  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  for  a  full  description  of
ARG’s  hedging  activities  and  related  accounting  policies.

Management  Estimates

The   preparation   of   financial   statements   in   conformity   with   generally   accepted   accounting   principles   in   the   United   States   of
America   requires   management   to   make   estimates   and   assumptions   that   affect   the   reported   amounts   of   assets,   liabilities,
revenues  and  expenses  during  the  reporting  period.  Significant  estimates  using  management  judgement  are  made  in  the  areas  of
recoverability  and  useful  lives  of  assets,  as  well  as  liabilities  for  casualty  claims  and  income  taxes.  Actual  results  could  differ  from
those  estimates.

Foreign  Currency  Translation

The  functional  currency  of  the  Company  is  the  Australian  dollar.  Foreign  currency  transactions  are  translated  at  the  applicable
rates   of   exchange   prevailing   at   the   transaction   dates.   Monetary   assets   and   liabilities   denominated   in   foreign   currencies   at   the
balance  sheet  date  are  translated  at  the  applicable  rates  of  exchange  prevailing  at  that  date.  All  exchange  gains  and  losses  are
reflected  in  the  statement  of  income.  Cumulative  translation  gains  or  losses  arising  from  translating  the  Australian  dollar  denomi-
nated  financial  statements  into  US  dollars  are  reported  in  other  comprehensive  income  as  a  component  of  stockholders’  equity.

3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Major classifications of property and equipment are as follows:

Land and buildings

Track improvements

Equipment and other

Lease premium

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

2003

2002

$000 USD

$ 28,532

$ 22,335

166,645

101,425

195,925

143,165

160,166

172,891

551,268

439,816

(72,460)

(37,530)

$478,808

$402,286

The  lease  premium  represents  the  cost  paid  to  the  Government  of  Western  Australia  as  part  of  the  purchase  price  for  Westrail
Freight,  for  access  to  the  track  infrastructure  network  for  a  period  of  49 years.

4. OTHER ASSETS

Major  classifications  of  other  assets  are  as  follows:

Deferred finance costs

Less: Accumulated amortization

$

2,756

$

8,747

(23)

(4,523)

$

2,733

$

4,224

Deferred   financing   costs   are   amortized   over   terms   of   the   related   debt   using   the   straight-line   method,   which   approximates   the
effective  interest  method.

5. LONG-TERM  DEBT

Current — interest bearing

Non-current — interest bearing

— $133,263

$367,892

$195,039

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

9 1

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Credit  facilities

Total  facility  as  at  December 31,  2003  comprises  a  5 year  tranche  of  $90.1 million,  a  5 year  revolver  tranche  of  $150.2 million,  a
7 year  tranche  of  $150.2 million  and  a  $7.5 million  working  capital  tranche.  Unused  facilities  at  December 31,  2003  amount  to
$30.1 million.  All  these  loans  commenced  in  December 2003.  The  loans  are  non  amortizing  but  prepayable  at  the  discretion  of
Australian  Railroad  Group  Pty  Ltd.  The  minimum  future  repayments  are  set  out  in  the  schedule  below.  Loan  covenants  require  the
company  to  adhere  to  minimum  interest  cover  and  debt  ratios.  All  loan  covenants  have  been  complied  with.

The   interest   rate   is   derived   from   the   bank   bill   bid   rate.   The   weighted   average   interest   rate   on   secured   loans   during   2003   was
6.05%  (2002:  6.09%)  and  excludes  any  interest  hedging  adjustments.  Including  the  effect  of  the  interest  rate  swaps  the  effective
interest  rate  was  7.80%  for  2003  and  7.84%  for  2002.

Schedule  of  Future  Minimum  Payments

The  following  is  a  summary  of  the  scheduled  maturities  of  long-term  debt:

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Thereafter

2003

2002

$000 USD

$

— $

—

—

—

—

—

217,732

150,160

133,263

—

195,039

—

—

—

$367,892

$328,302

6. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

(a) Interest  rate  risk

The   Company   uses   derivative   financial   instruments   principally   to   manage   the   risk   that   changes   in   interest   rates   will   affect   the
amount  of  its  future  interest  payments.  Interest  rate  swap  contracts  are  used  to  adjust  the  proportion  of  total  debt  that  is  subject
to  variable  interest  rates.  Under  an  interest  rate  swap  contract,  the  Company  agrees  to  pay  an  amount  equal  to  a  specified  fixed-
rate  of  interest  times  a  notional  principal  amount,  and  to  receive  in  return  an  amount  equal  to  a  specified  variable-rate  of  interest
times  the  same  notional  amount.

For  interest  rate  swap  contracts  under  which  the  Company  agrees  to  pay  fixed-rates  of  interest,  these  contracts  are  considered
to  be  a  cash  flow  hedge  against  changes  in  the  amount  of  future  cash  flows  associated  with  the  Company’s  interest  payments  of
variable-rate  debt  obligations.  Accordingly,  the  interest  rate  swap  contracts  are  reflected  at  fair  value  in  the  Company’s  consoli-
dated  balance  sheet  and  the  related  gains  or  losses  on  these  contracts  are  deferred  in  stockholders’  equity  (as  a  component  of
comprehensive   income).   However,   to   the   extent   that   any   of   these   contracts   are   not   considered   to   be   perfectly   effective   in
offsetting   the   change   in   the   value   of   the   interest   payments   being   hedged,   any   changes   in   fair   value   relating   to   the   ineffective
portion  of  these  contracts  are  immediately  recognized  as  an  interest  expense  in  the  income  statement.  The  accounting  for  hedge
effectiveness  is  measured  at  least  quarterly  based  on  the  relative  change  in  fair  value  between  the  derivative  contract  and  the
hedged   item   over   time.   The   net   effect   of   this   accounting   in   the   Company’s   operating   results   is   that   interest   expense   on   the
portion  of  variable-rate  debt  being  hedged  is  recorded  based  on  fixed  interest  rates.  Hedge  ineffectiveness  for  cash  flow  hedges
were  not  material  for  the  years  ended  December 31,  2003,  2002  and  2001.

The   Company   entered   into   rate   swap   agreements   on   its   $217.7  million   variable   rate   debt   due   December  18,   2008   and   its
$150.2  million   variable   rate   debt   due   December  18,   2010.   These   interest   rate   swap   contracts   were   entered   for   interest   rate
exposure  management  purposes  and  mature  on  December 18,  2007.  As  a  result  of  FAS 133,  the  Company  recorded  a  cumulative
transition  adjustment  of  $3.6 million  net  of  income  taxes,  to  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income.  The  transition  adjustment
is   being   amortized   over   the   future   life   of   the   underlying   debt   obligations.   At   December  31,   2002   and   2003,   the   Company   had
interest  rate  swap  contracts  to  pay  fixed-rates  of  interest  between  5.6%  and  6.9%  and  receive  variable-rates  of  interest  of  an
average  of  6.1%  on  $367.3 million  notional  amount  of  indebtedness.

(b) Fair  value

The  carrying  amounts  of  financial  assets  and  financial  liabilities  at  December 31,  2003,  approximate  the  aggregate  fair  value  of
the  financial  instruments.

9 2 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(c) Credit  risk  exposures

The  Company’s  maximum  exposures  to  credit  risk  at  December 31,  2003,  in  relation  to  each  class  of  recognized  financial  asset  is
the  carrying  amount  of  those  assets  as  indicated  in  the  balance  sheet.

In  relation  to  derivative  financial  instruments,  credit  risk  arises  from  the  potential  failure  of  counterparties  to  meet  their  obligations
under  the  contract  or  arrangements.  The  Company’s  maximum  credit  risk  exposure  in  relation  to  interest  rate  swap  contracts  is
limited  to  the  net  amounts  to  be  received  on  contracts  that  are  favourable  to  the  Company,  being  none  at  December 31,  2003.

Concentration  of  credit  risk

For   the   year   ending   December  31,   2003,   the   Company’s   primary   location   of   business   was   within   New   South   Wales,   South
Australia  and  Western  Australia,  which  therefore  represents  the  location  of  the  Company’s  credit  risk.  Trade  payables /receivables
are  normally  payable/collectable  within  30 days.

Except  for  securities  held  to  ensure  the  performance  of  contractor  guarantees  or  warrantees,  amounts  due  from  major  receiv-
ables  are  not  normally  secured  by  collateral,  however  the  creditworthiness  of  receivables  is  regularly  monitored.  Securities  held
to  ensure  the  performance  of  contractor  guarantees  or  warrantees  include  Bank  Guarantees,  Personal  (Directors)  Guarantees  or
cash.  The  value  of  securities  held  is  dependent  on  the  nature,  including  the  complexity  and  risk  of  the  contract.

7. INCOME TAXES

The  prima  facie  tax  on  income  before  income  taxes  differs  from  the  income  tax  provided  in  the  financial  statements  as  follows:

Prima facie tax at 30% on income before income taxes

Tax effect of permanent differences:

Amortization of lease premium

Non-allowable items

Other items (a)

Total income tax expense

2003

2002
$000 USD

2001

$ 7,383

$ 6,749

$7,646

—

14

—

—

(3,531)

(1,225)

976

21

(59)

$ 3,866

$ 5,524

$8,584

(a) The other items in the 2002 and 2003 years arose primarily as a result of finalizing the tax base of assets acquired from Westrail. The net assets
acquired were from a government tax exempt entity, and the determination of the tax base involved the application of complex legislation. During
the year all matters were favourably resolved with the Australian Taxation Office, resulting in an overprovision of tax in the prior periods. The
Company is governed by the taxation laws of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, which has a statutory tax rate of 30%.

Total  income  tax  expense  includes:

Current

Deferred

2003

2002
$000 USD

2001

$(2,527)

$2,005

$ 166

6,393

3,519

8,418

$ 3,866

$5,524

$8,584

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

9 3

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The  deferred  income  tax  balance  comprises:

Non-current deferred income tax assets

Materials and supplies

Income accruals

Expense accruals

Employee leave provisions

Tax vs. book values of property and equipment

Income tax losses carried forward

Unrealised losses on interest rate swaps

Valuation allowance

Current deferred income tax liabilities:

Employee leave provisions

Expense accruals

Materials and supplies

Prepayments

Income accruals

Non-current deferred income tax liability

Tax vs. book values of property and equipment

2003

2002

$000 USD

$

65

$

307

1,260

1,746

61,259

12,816

2,740

(—)

—

—

—

—

—

5,613

4,979

(—)

$ 80,193

$10,592

$

— $ 1,373

—

321

(1,465)

(1,084)

(462)

(609)

(192)

(489)

$ (2,536)

$

(71)

$(11,735)

$ (2,427)

Operating   loss   carry   forward   have   no   expiry   date   and   the   company   expects   to   recover   all   operating   losses.   Consequently,   no
valuation  allowance  is  provided  for  the  deferred  tax  assets  for  2003  and  2002.

8. PREFERRED STOCK

Redeemable  preference shares  are  fully  paid  and  earn  a  dividend  at  the  declaration  of  the  Directors  from  time  to  time.  The  shares
are   redeemable   at   the   option   of   the holders   of   the   preferred   shares,   who   are   GWI   and   Wesfarmers.   Upon   redemption   the
shareholder  is  entitled  to  receive  the  paid  up  amount  of  the  preferred shares.  In  the  event  of  the  winding  up  of  the  Company,  the
holders  of  redeemable  preference shares  are  entitled  in  priority  to  the  holders  of  any  other  classes  of  shares  to  payment  of  the
paid  up  amount  of  the shares  and  the  amount  of  any  declared  but  unpaid  dividends  at  that  date,  but  shall  not  otherwise  have  any
rights  to  participate  in  surplus  assets.  Preferred  shares  carry  no  voting  rights.

9. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME  (LOSS)

The   components   of   other   comprehensive   income   (loss),   net   of   income   tax,   included   in   the   consolidated   balance   sheet   as   of
December 31,  2003  are  as  follows:

Net foreign currency translation adjustments

Unrealized losses on interest rate swaps

Less Income taxes

Net unrealized losses on interest rate swaps

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

9 4 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

2003

2002
$000 USD

2001

$50,513

$ 4,737

$ (7,740)

(9,133)

(16,621)

2,740

4,986

(9,667)

2,900

(6,393)

(11,635)

(6,767)

$44,120

$ (6,898)

$(14,507)

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

10. Expenditure  Commitments

(a) Future minimum lease payments under all non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:

2004

2005

2006

2007

Thereafter

(b) Other capital expenditures:

Later than one year, but not later than five years

Later than five years

2003

2002

$000 USD

$ 1,141

$

324

323

323

646

3

2

2

2

2

$ 2,757

$

11

$13,727

$24,570

—

—

$13,727

$24,570

Operating  leases  are  entered  into  for  motor  vehicles  and  office  equipment.  Rental  payments  are  fixed  for  the  life  of  the  lease  for
all   types   of   operating   leases.   Purchase   options   and   renewal   terms   exist   at   the   Company’s   discretion   and   no   operating   lease
contains  restrictions  on  financing  or  other  leasing  activities.  Operating  lease  expense  in  2003  was  $1.1 million  (2002:  $1.0 million,
2001:  $2.0 million).

Under  the  agreement  for  the  acquisition  of  the  Westrail  Freight  business,  there  is  an  obligation  to  complete  the  resleepering  on
the  Toodyay  to  Miling  lines  by  June 30,  2004  and  this  work  is  in  progress.  Total  costs  are  estimated  to  be  $6.0 million  (2002:
$6.1 million).  Negotiations  are  continuing  with  the  State  Government  on  remaining  obligations  on  the  Katanning  to  Nyabing,  and
Yilliminning  to  Bruce  Rock  lines.

The  balance  of  capital  commitments  have  been  approved  and  committed  to  infrastructure  expenditure.

11. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

GWA   Northern   Pty   Ltd,   a   wholly   owned   subsidiary   of   the   Company,   unconditionally   and   irrevocably   guarantees   the   due   and
punctual  payment  of  the  secured  debt  of  the  Asia  Pacific  Transport  Joint  Venture,  severally  in  accordance  with  its  participating
interest,  which  is  1.19%  (2002:  1.45%),  amounting  to  $5.0 million  (2002:  $2.1 million).

ARG  Sell  Down  No 1  Pty  Limited,  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  the  Company,  unconditionally  and  irrevocably  guarantees  the  due
and  punctual  payment  of  the  secured  debt  of  the  Asia  Pacific  Transport  Joint  Venture,  severally  in  accordance  with  its  participat-
ing  interest,  which  is  0.95%  (2002:  1.14%),  amounting  to  $4.0 million  (2002:  $1.7 million).

WestNet  Rail  Pty  Ltd  (WestNet),  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  the  Company,  has  received  a  notice  of  claim  from  a  contractor  for
$11.9  million   for   cost   variations   in   the   construction   of   an   asset.   Under   the   contract   they   have   formally   lodged   the   claim   and
WestNet  has  formally  rejected  it.  The  company  considers  it  has  a  strong  case  to  refute  the  claim.

Australia  Southern  Railroad  Pty  Ltd  (ASR),  a  wholly  owned  subsidiary  of  the  Company,  has  been  joined  as  a  third  party  in  legal
proceedings   by   one   of   its   customers.   The   claims   relate   to   derailments   during   the   period   1999-2000   and   total   $2.4  million
excluding  interest  and  costs.  Legal  opinion  indicates  that  the  probability  of  loss  to  ASR  is  remote.

12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The  following  Employee  Benefit  Plans  have  been  established:

Plan

Benefit Type

Australian Railroad Group Superannuation Plan

Accumulated lump sum/defined contribution plan

Westscheme Plan

West Super Plus Plan

Accumulated lump sum/defined contribution plan

Accumulated lump sum/defined contribution plan

Employees  contribute  to  the  funds  at  various  percentages  of  their  remuneration.  The  consolidated  entity’s  contributions  are  not
legally   enforceable   other   than   those   payable   in   terms   of   notified   award   and   superannuation   guarantee   levy   obligations.   The
related  expense  for  the  year  charged  to  the  income  statement  was  $3.2 million  (2002:  $1.5 million,  2001:  $2.4 million).

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

9 5

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

13. ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY

Approximately   19.8%   (2002:   21.8%,   2001:   21.5%)   of   the   Company’s   revenue   is   generated   from   freight   services   rendered   to
Australian  Wheat  Board  Ltd.

14. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Industry  Segment

The  group  operates  in  only  one  industry,  being  rail  freight  transport.

15. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

1.

Interest   free,   unsecured   loans   amounting   to   $11.6  million   (2002:   $8.7  million),   made   equally   by   the   shareholders,   Wes-
farmers   Ltd   and   Genesee   &   Wyoming   Inc   to   the   consolidated   entity.   These   loans   have   been   subordinated   in   favour   of
other  creditors.

2. Services  to  the  group  by  Wesfarmers  Ltd  of  $0.7 million  (2002:  $0.5 million)  and  Genesee  &  Wyoming  Inc  of  $0.4 million
(2002:  $1.0 million)  are  recovered  at  cost.  At  December 31,  2003  the  balance  owing  to  Wesfarmers  Ltd  was  $0.1 million
(2002:  $0.1 million  )  and  to  Genesee  and  Wyoming  Inc  $0.1 million  (2002:  $0.1 million).

16. RESTRUCTURING COSTS

On  October 15,  2002  a  further  redundancy  of  68  employees  was  approved  by  the  Directors  at  a  cost  of  $2.6 million,  which  had
been   expensed   in   that   year.   At   December  31,   2002   an   accrual   of   $0.2  million   remained   in   respect   of   5   employees   still   to   be
terminated.  During  2003  the  remaining  employees  were  terminated  and  the  balance  of  the  accrual  was  paid.

On  October 11,  2001,  the  Company  announced  that  it  was  restructuring  the  operations  of  the  formerly  state-owned  assets  of
Westrail  Freight  and  expected  a  work  force  reduction  of  80  employees  by  the  end  of  March 2002.  The  estimated  restructuring
costs  of  $4.1 million  have  been  accounted  for  as  an  adjustment  to  the  purchase  price  of  Westrail  Freight.  At  December 21,  2001,
the  services  of  42  employees  had  been  terminated  at  a  total  cost  of  $2.6  million.  The  remaining  38  employees  were  terminated,
and  the  remaining  restructuring  costs  of  $1.5 million  were  paid  in  2002.

17. UNSUCCESSFUL BID COSTS

In  January 2002,  the  Company  announced  that  its  bid  for  the  acquisition  of  the  National  Rail/Freightcorp  operations  in  Australia
was   unsuccessful.   This   announcement   resulted   in   a   write-off   of   all   costs   incurred   through   December  31,   2001,   amounting   to
$1.8  million,   associated   with   the   unsuccessful   bid.   An   amount   of   $0.9  million   additional   costs   of   the   unsuccessful   bid   were
expensed  in  2002.

18. ASSET IMPAIRMENT

There   is   no   impairment   loss   in   2003.   In   2002   certain   under   utilised   plant   and   equipment   was   written   down   to   its   recoverable
amount.   The   recoverable   amount   of   these   assets   was   determined   based   on   current   resale   values.   The   impairment   write   down
amounted  to  $1.0 million.  (2001  :  Nil)

19. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board   (FASB)  recently   issued   the   following   Statements   of   Financial   Accounting   Standards
(SFAS):

FASB   Interpretation   45   ‘‘Guarantor’s   Accounting   and   Disclosure   Requirements   for   Guarantees,   Including   Indirect
Guarantees  of  Indebtedness  to  Others’’

In   November  2002,   the   FASB   issued   Interpretation   No.  45,   (FIN)  Guarantor’s   Accounting   and   Disclosure   Requirements   for
Guarantees,  Including  Indirect  Guarantees  of  Indebtedness  to  Others,  which  address  the  disclosure  to  be  made  by  a  guarantor  in
its  interim  and  annual  financial  statements  about  its  obligations  under  guarantees.  Fin  45  also  requires  the  guarantor  to  recognize
a  liability  for  the  non-contingent  component  of  the  guarantee,  which  is  the  obligation  to  stand  ready  to  perform  in  the  event  that
specified   triggering   events   or   conditions   occur.   The   recognition   and   measurement   provisions   of   FIN   45   are   effective   for   all
guarantees  entered  into  or  modified  after  December 31,  2002.  The  Company  did  not  enter  into  such  transactions.  Therefore  the
adoption  of  this  standard  did  not  impact  its  consolidated  financial  position,  results  of  operations,  or  disclosure  requirements.

FASB  Interpretation  46,  ‘‘Consolidation  of  Variable  Interest  Entities’’

In   January  2003   the   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board   issued   FASB   Interpretation   46,   ‘‘Consolidation   of   Variable   Interest
Entities’’.  The  interpretation  defines  variable  interest  entities  as  those  in  which  equity  investment  at  risk  is  not  sufficient  to  permit

9 6 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .  2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K

AUSTRALIAN RAILROAD GROUP PTY LTD AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the  entity  to  finance  its  activities  without  additional  subordinated  financial  support  from  other  parties,  or  entities  in  which  equity
investors   lack   certain   essential   characteristics   of   a   controlling   financial   interest.   The   primary   beneficiary   of   a   variable   interest
entity  is  the  party  that  absorbs  a  majority  of  the  entity’s  expected  losses,  receives  a  majority  of  its  expected  residual  returns,  or
both,  as  a  result  of  holding  variable  interests,  which  are  the  ownership,  contractual,  or  other  pecuniary  interests  in  an  entity.  The
primary   beneficiary   is   required   to   consolidate   the   financial   position   and   results   of   operations   of   the   variable   interest   entity.   In
December  2003,   the   Financial   Accounting   Standards   Board,   issued   revisions   to   FASB   Interpretation   46,   resulting   in   multiple
effective   dates   based   on   the   characteristics   as   well   as   the   creation   dates   of   the   variable   interest   entities,   however   with   no
effective  date  later  than  the  Company’s  first  quarter  of  2004.  The  Company  does  not  believe  that  adoption  of  this  statement  will
have  a  material  effect  on  its  consolidated  financial  statements.

2 0 0 3  F O R M  1 0 K  G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

9 7

CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

STOCK REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT

LaSalle Bank, N.A.
Trust and Asset Management
135 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1960
Chicago, Illinois 60603
312-904-2450
www.lasallebank.com

AUDITORS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
1301 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019
646-471-4000
www.pwcglobal.com

Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
66 Field Point Road
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
203-629-3722
Fax 203-661-4106
NYSE GWR
www.gwrr.com

COMMON STOCK

On  June  24,  1996,  the  Company’s  Class  A  Common  Stock  began
publicly trading and was quoted on the Nasdaq National Market until
September 26, 2002, under the trading symbol GNWR. On Septem-
ber 27, 2002, the Company’s Class A Common Stock began publicly
trading  on  the  New  York  Stock  Exchange  under  the  trading  symbol
GWR. The Class B Common Stock is not publicly traded.

The  actual  prices  of  Class  A  Common  Stock  reflected  below  have
been adjusted for a three-for-two stock split paid on March 15, 2004
to shareholders of record on February 27, 2004; a three-for-two stock
split  paid  on  March  14,  2002  to  shareholders  of  record  on  Febru-
ary 28, 2002; and a three-for-two stock split paid on June 15, 2001 to
shareholders of record on May 31, 2001:

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003:

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002:

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

HIGH

LOW

$23.13

$15.67

$17.15

$13.60

$14.29

$10.26

$14.07

$ 8.47

HIGH

LOW

$15.47

$12.00

$16.11

$10.47

$17.53

$13.17

$15.85

$12.80

As  of  March  25,  2004,  there  were  156  record  holders  of  Class  A
Common Stock and 9 holders of Class B Common Stock. The Com-
pany believes that there are approximately 8,200 beneficial owners of
Class A Common Stock.

Prior  to  its  initial  public  offering,  the  Company  paid  dividends  on  its
common stock. However, since its initial public offering the Company
has not paid dividends on its common stock and the Company does
not intend to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

9 8 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Robert  W.  Anestis
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
Florida East Coast Industries
Chairman of Compensation Committee

Mortimer B. Fuller  III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Louis  S. Fuller
Retired, Courtright and Associates

T. Michael Long
Partner, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
Member of Audit Committee

Robert  M.  Melzer
Retired, former Chief Executive Officer,
Property Capital Trust
Chairman of Audit Committee

Philip  J. Ringo
Chairman and CEO, RubberNetwork.com
Member of Audit Committee
Member of Governance Committee

Peter  O. Scannell
Founder and Managing General Partner,
Rockwood Holdings LP
Member of Audit Committee
Member of Compensation Committee

Mark A. Scudder
President, Scudder Law Firm, P.C., L.L.O.
Member of Compensation Committee
Member of Governance Committee

Hon.  M.  Douglas Young, P.C.
Chairman, SUMMA Strategies Canada, Inc.
Chairman of Governance Committee

Robert W. Anestis

Mortimer B. Fuller III

Louis S. Fuller

T. Michael Long

Robert M. Melzer

Philip J. Ringo

Peter O. Scannell

Mark A. Scudder

Hon. M. Douglas Young, P.C.

G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .

9 9

SENIOR  EXECUTIVES

Mark  W. Hastings
Executive  Vice  President
Corporate  Development

James  W. Benz
Senior  Vice  President
GWI  Rail  Switching  Services

Mario Brault
Senior  Vice  President
Canada  Region

David J.  Collins
Senior  Vice  President
New  York/Pennsylvania  Region

James N.  Davis
Senior  Vice  President
Utah  Region

Thomas  P. Loftus
Senior  Vice  President
Finance  and  Treasurer

Shayne L.  Magdoff
Senior  Vice  President
Administration  and  Human  Resources

Larry Phipps
Senior  Vice  President
Oregon  Region

Paul  M. Victor
Senior  Vice  President
Mexico  Region

Spencer D. White
Senior  Vice  President
Illinois  Region

Mike Meyers
Vice  President — Information
Technology

Richard  T.  O’Donnell
Vice  President — Taxes

Jerry Sattora
Vice  President — Accounting

Jack Stolarczyk
Vice  President — Safety  &  Environment

Matthew O. Walsh
Vice  President — Finance  and  Acquisitions

Scott F. Ziegler
Vice  President — Operational  Finance

CORPORATE  OFFICERS

Mortimer B. Fuller III
Chairman  of  the  Board  of  Directors
and  Chief  Executive  Officer

Charles N. Marshall
President  and
Chief  Operating  Officer

John C. Hellmann
Chief  Financial  Officer

Adam B. Frankel
Senior  Vice  President
General  Counsel  and  Secretary

Charles W. Chabot
President — Marketing  &  Development

Robert Grossman
Executive  Vice  President
Government  &  Industry  Affairs

Alan R. Harris
Chief  Accounting  Officer
Retiring  in  2004

James M. Andres
Chief  Accounting  Officer  and  Global  Controller

1 0 0 G e n e s e e  &  W y o m i n g  I n c .