Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Gold / Genesis Minerals Limited / FY2010 Annual Report

Genesis Minerals Limited
Annual Report 2010

GMD · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker GMD
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Gold
Employees 1-10
← All annual reports
FY2010 Annual Report · Genesis Minerals Limited
Loading PDF…
Genesis Minerals Limited 
and controlled entities 

ABN 72 124 772 041  

Annual Report 

for the year ended 30 June 2010 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Corporate Directory 

ABN 72 124 772 041  

Directors 
Michael Haynes (Non Executive Chairman) 
Michael Fowler (Managing Director) 
Graeme Smith (Non Executive Director) 

Company Secretary 
Graeme Smith 

Registered Office   
23 Altona Street 
WEST PERTH  WA  6005 

Principal Place of Business 
Level 3, 10 Outram Street 
WEST PERTH  WA  6005 
Telephone: +61 8 9322 6178 
Facsimile: +61 8 9481 2335 

Postal Address 
PO Box 437 
WEST PERTH  WA  6872 

Solicitors 
Wright Legal 
1/103 Colin Street  
WEST PERTH  WA  6005 

Share Register 
Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd 
Level 2, Reserve Bank Building 
45 St George’s Terrace 
PERTH  WA  6000 

Auditors 
Bentleys 
Level 1, 12 Kings Park Road 
WEST PERTH  WA  6005 

Internet Address 
www.genesisminerals.com.au 

Email Address 
info@genesisminerals.com.au 

Securities Exchange Listing 
Genesis Minerals Limited shares are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX code: GMD). 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Contents 

Chairman’s Letter 

Operations Review 

Directors' Report 

Auditor’s Independence Declaration 

Corporate Governance Statement 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Directors' Declaration 

Independent Auditor’s Report to Members 

ASX Additional Information 

3 

4 

 10 

 15 

16 

 20 

21 

22 

  23 

 24 

 43 

44 

46 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Dear Fellow Shareholder 

I am pleased to present the Annual Report of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2010.   

The  majority  of  our  focus  during  the  past  year  involved  reviewing  numerous  acquisition  opportunities  in  South  America.    The  strong 
network  that  we  have  developed  in  Chile  over  the  past  2  years  is  providing  dividends,  as  we  reviewed  a  steady  stream  of  projects, 
culminating in the acquisition of two new projects during 2010. We continue to review numerous acquisition opportunities.   

During the year Genesis elected not to participate further in the Merceditas Project in Chile, as we considered our efforts and funds are 
better deployed elsewhere.  

In August 2010 Genesis entered into agreements to acquire a 100% interest in the Dinamarquesa Gold-Copper Project and a 100% interest 
in the  Cerro  Verde  Gold-Copper-Silver  Project.    Both  projects are  located  in the  Atacama  Desert near the  regional  City  of  Copiapó  in 
northern Chile, in areas serviced by excellent infrastructure.  We believe there is considerable potential to discover high grade gold and 
copper mineralisation as well as disseminated porphyry hosted gold-copper mineralisation at both projects. 

A concerted exploration effort has commenced to discover commercially significant mineralisation at these projects. 

We will continue to simultaneously pursue the acquisition of  other highly prospective, advanced  copper and gold projects in Chile and 
elsewhere in Latin America. 

The  Company  has  established  an  excellent  team that is  operating  in  highly  prospective  geological  terranes.    As  such  we are  in  a great 
position to capitalise on the continued recovery of global metal prices, particularly copper and gold prices.  With two highly prospective 
projects and a dedicated, highly competent management team, the Company is well positioned to leverage from exploration success. 

On behalf of the Board I would like to thank you for your continued support and I look forward to keeping you informed of our progress 
during the forthcoming year. 

Mike Haynes 
Chairman 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Review of Operations 

In  August  2010  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  entered  into  agreements  with  private  Chilean  companies  to  acquire  100%  interests  in  the 
Dinamarquesa Gold-Copper Project and the Cerro Verde Gold-Copper-Silver Project.  Both Projects are located in the Atacama Desert 
near the regional City of Copiapó in northern Chile, in areas serviced by excellent infrastructure.   

DINAMARQUESA PROJECT BACKGROUND 

Introduction 

Genesis Minerals Limited has entered into an agreement with a private Chilean company to acquire a 100% interest in the Dinamarquesa 
Gold – Copper Project in northern Chile.  Limited previous wide spaced drilling has delineated a number of high grade structures that will 
be followed-up by diamond and RC drilling.  The Project occurs in the highly mineralised Inca de Oro gold-copper belt. 

Location and Access 

The Project is located in the Atacama Desert in an area serviced by excellent infrastructure about 850 km north of Santiago, 90 km north of 
the  city  of  Copiapó and 75km east  of  the Pacific  Ocean.   The  Project  lies 3  km southwest  of  the  small  town  of  Inca  de  Oro  which  is 
connected by a sealed highway to Copiapó in the south and Diego de Almagro in the north.  The altitude ranges from 1,600 to 2,100m, 
with low relief. Exploration can be conducted all year round. 

District Exploration History  

Gold-copper mineralisation in the Inca de Oro district has been known since the time of the Incas.  In “modern times” it is estimated that 
over 500,000 ounces of gold have been mined from numerous high grade veins in the district.  The grade of the veins ranged from 10 to 
100g/t gold. The majority of production took place between 1930 and 1945.   

Figure 1 Project Locations.   

 Figure 2 Dinamarquesa Simplified geology and Project location. 

Recent exploration activity has mostly comprised evaluation of the potential of the porphyry systems in the area. Between 2005 and 2007 
Codelco (Chilean State National Copper Corporation) defined an Indicated and Inferred sulphide Mineral Resource of 259 million tonnes 
grading 0.46% copper and 0.13g/t gold at the Inca de Oro Copper
Gold Project (Pan Aust ASX Release 1 March 2010).  At the Carmen 
Project, located 4km south of the Company’s Dinamarquesa Project, resources of 41 million tonnes @ 0.6g/t gold and 0.4% copper have 
been delineated. 

‐

Project History 

Exploration and mining company Santa Fe Pacific Chile explored the Project between 1994 and 1995 completing 820 metres of trenching 
and nine shallow, widely-spaced RC drill holes for 1,607 metres. Samples were analysed for gold and copper.   

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Results from the wide spaced RC drilling completed by Santa Fe include: 

Hole 
Number 

Northing  Easting  mRL 

UTM 
Az. 

Dip 

DM01 

7,037,050 

406,710  Nat. Surf 

180 

DM03 

7,037,340 

406,610  Nat. Surf 

0 

-60 

-60 

Hole 
Depth 
(m) 

200 

200 

From  To 

Interval  Au 

(g/t ) 

Cu 
(%) 

156 

157 

51 

53 

134 

135 

DM04 

7,037,340 

406,610  Nat. Surf 

180 

-60 

200 

64 

65 

164 

165 

DM05 

7,037,210 

406,510  Nat. Surf 

180 

DM06 

7,037,215 

406,510  Nat. Surf 

0 

-60 

-60 

180 

150 

DM07 

7,037,050 

406,410  Nat. Surf 

180 

-60 

165 

DM08 

7,037,190 

406,410  Nat. Surf 

0 

-60 

207 

DM09 

7,037,110 

406,310  Nat. Surf 

0 

-60 

200 

8 

14 

75 

20 

30 

0 

17 

56 

89 

91 

93 

167 

172 

186 

195 

205 

17 

94 

119 

147 

157 

188 

68 

15 

76 

21 

31 

36 

18 

57 

90 

92 

95 

168 

174 

190 

200 

206 

56 

95 

120 

150 

158 

191 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 

0.78 

0.19 

32.02  1.23 

2.59 

0.2 

1.12 

0.08 

1.21 

0.53 

60 

0.19 

0.3 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0.75 

0.27 

1.86 

0.13 

2.55 

0.18 

0.96 

0.29 

36 

0.2 

0.28 

1 

1 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2 

4 

5 

1 

0.66 

0.21 

29.9 

0.01 

1.35 

0.08 

1.01 

0.04 

3.22 

0.02 

10.9 

1.45 

19.9 

0.53 

0.94 

0.24 

12.8 

0.22 

2.01 

0.07 

39 

0.1 

0.32 

1 

1 

3 

1 

3 

0.92 

0.32 

1.68 

0.32 

10.7 

1.17 

6.75 

0.02 

2.07 

0.23 

Intercepts based on 1m RC samples completed by Santa Fe Mining Company in 1995.  The approximate position of drill holes have been 
validated in the field. 

5 

 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Figure 3 Panoramic view looking north from the Dinamarquesa Project. 

Figure 4 Panoramic view of the Dinamarquesa Project looking to the southeast 

Small scale mining has also taken place in parts of the Project to maximum depths of about 50m.  The amount of ore extracted from the 
Project is unknown. 

No exploration has been undertaken at the Project since 1995, and systematic exploration has never been undertaken.  

Geology and Mineralisation 

The Project covers andesitic lava flows, breccias and tuffaceous rocks of the Jurassic Punta del Cobre Formation which has been intruded 
by Cretaceous to Palaeocene dioritic, granodioritic to tonalitic intrusions.  The north northeast trending Inca de Oro Fault system is the 
main  structure  in  the  area.    Two  main  styles  of  gold  –  copper  mineralisation  occur  in  the  district;  vein/stockwork  mineralisation  and 
porphyry style mineralisation. Both styles are associated with potassic alteration.  The depth of weathering varies from 20 to 40 metres. 

The  gold  –  copper  mineralisation  at  Dinamarquesa  is  associated with  veins  and  stockworks  trending  east  to  north  northeast,  hosted  in 
andesitic rocks intruded by a series of porphyries.  The veins generally comprise quartz, pyrite, chalcopyrite, gold and occasionally calcite 
and barite and are associated with potassic alteration. 

Exploration Potential 

Genesis considers there to be very good potential to locate and define numerous high grade gold and copper rich structures. If exploration 
is successful the proximity to existing processing facilities presents potential for near term cash flow with low capital start up costs.  

Potential also exists to define porphyry hosted gold-copper mineralisation at the Project.  Drill hole DM 05 returned an intersection of 60m 
@  0.19g/t  gold  and  0.3%  copper  from  8m.    Mineralisation  in this  hole  was  associated  with  the  contact  of  a  porphyry  intrusion  and 
andesitic rocks.  A number of the other holes intersected wide zones of low grade gold – copper mineralisation that are yet to be followed 
up.  The presence of good exploration pathfinders like A and B veinlets types associated with copper in granodiorite in the southern part of 
the Project is considered positive. 

Work Program 

A  work  program  comprising  detailed  geological  mapping,  historical  data  compilation  and  3D  modelling  will  be  undertaken,  prior  to 
commencing  a  drilling  program  in  mid  November  2010.    Exploration  will  target  both  high  grade  vein/stockwork  mineralisation  and 
porphyry hosted gold copper mineralisation.   

Acquisition Terms 

Genesis executed an Option Agreement with a private Chilean company providing it the exclusive right to acquire a 100% interest in the 
Dinamarquesa Project.  An initial payment of US$125,000 was made in September 2010 after completing due diligence.  Staged payments 
totalling US$4,300,000 are due over a 48 month period with a 2nd payment of US$125,000 due by June 30 2011.  

6 

 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Figure 5 Drill hole locations with intersections 

Figure 6 Dinamarquesa SE Vein Target 

7 

 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

CERRO VERDE PROJECT BACKGROUND 

Introduction  

Copper

Genesis  entered  into  an  agreement  with  a  second  private  Chilean  company  to  acquire  a  100%  interest  in  the  Cerro  Verde 
Gold
Silver Project in northern Chile.  Mining in the area dates back to the 1800s but only limited modern exploration has been 
completed at the Project.  Numerous high grade structures remain untested and the potential to discover new veins is considered high; as is 
the potential to define a large porphyry system on the Project.  

‐

‐

Location and Access  

The Project is located in the Atacama Desert in an area serviced by very good infrastructure about 750 km north of Santiago, 80 km south 
of the city of Copiapó and 75km east of the Pacific Ocean.  The Project is easily accessed by a sealed road and well formed gravel roads 
from Copiapó. The altitude ranges from 1,800 to 2,200m, with low to moderate relief. Exploration can be conducted all year round. 

Geology and Mineralisation  

parallel swarm of precious and base metal

The Project hosts a sub
caldera  system  that  is  elongated  north
rhyolite flows, flow
stratigraphic column. Mineralised veins and structures strike north to north east with moderate to steep dips to the east and west. 

bearing quartz specularite veins exposed along the western flank of a 
south.    The  host  rocks  comprise  a  sequence  of  Paleocene  andesitic  volcaniclastics,  dacite  and 
bearing veins cut the entire 

like breccias, and dikes capped by a blanket of rhyolitic ignimbrites. Ore

domes, diatreme

‐

‐

‐

Project and Exploration History  

‐

‐

‐

Historic mining in the area dates back to the 1800s with several high grade veins mined at depth. Only limited historic mining records are 
currently available to Genesis.  However, records indicate that in 1869 some 8,500 tonnes at ~17% copper were extracted from mines in 
the area.  Small scale mining and reclamation of old stockpiles continues at present.  

Minor  surface  exploration  was  completed  by  Homestake  between  1998  and  1999.    Between  2004  and  2005,  Hochschilds  (MH  Chile) 
explored the  area  by  surface  mapping,  sampling  (334 surface  samples)  and  limited  diamond drilling  (1,219m  completed).   The  surface 
rock chip sampling by Hochschilds highlighted significant gold, copper and silver surface mineralisation over a 4km by 2km area. Strong 
arsenic, barium, bismuth, mercury, molybdenum, lead and stibnite anomalism is also present.  

No other modern exploration is known to have been conducted at the Project. 

Exploration Potential  

Genesis considers there to be very good potential to locate and define numerous high grade gold
silver rich structures at the Cerro 
Blanco Project.  Both known and new structures are considered high priority targets.  If exploration is successful the proximity to existing 
processing facilities presents potential for near term cash flow with low capital start up cost.  

copper

‐

‐

Potential also exists to define porphyry hosted gold

copper mineralisation at the Project.  

Work Program  

‐

Over  the  next  four  months  a  work  program  comprising  detailed  geological  mapping,  systematic  geochemical  sampling,  geophysical 
surveying, historical data compilation and 3D modelling will be undertaken, prior to commencing a drilling program in the first quarter of 
2011.  A priority of the work program will be to complete a detailed compilation of historical mining data.  Exploration will target both 
high

grade vein/stockwork mineralisation and porphyry hosted gold

copper mineralisation.  

Acquisition Terms  

‐

‐

Genesis executed an Option Agreement with a private Chilean company providing it the exclusive right to acquire a 100% interest in the 
Cerro Verde Project.  An initial payment of US$30,000 was made in September 2010 after successfully completing due diligence.  Staged 
payments totalling US$4,000,000 are due over a 60 month period with a 2nd payment of US$75,000 due in September 2011.  In addition 
Genesis will issue the private Chilean company US$25,000 worth of fully paid ordinary shares in Genesis Minerals Limited on satisfactory 
completion of Due Diligence.  On each 12 month anniversary of the Agreement Genesis will issue the vendor an additional US$20,000 
worth of fully paid ordinary shares 

8 

 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

. 

Figure 7 Cerro Verde Historic Rock Chip Samples 

9 

 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Directors’ Report   

Your directors submit their report on the consolidated entity (referred to hereafter as the Group) consisting of Genesis Minerals Limited 
and the entities it controlled at the end of, or during, the year ended 30 June 2010. 

DIRECTORS 
The  names  and  details  of  the  Company's  directors  in  office  during  the  financial  year  and  until the  date  of  this report  are  as  follows. 
Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated. 

Information on Directors  

Michael Haynes, (Non Executive Chairman) 
Mr. Haynes has more than 18 years experience in the mining industry. Mr. Haynes graduated from the University of Western Australia 
with  an  honours  degree  in  geology  and  geophysics.  Throughout  his  career  he  has  been  intimately  involved  in  the  exploration  and 
development  of  resource  projects,  targeting  a  wide  variety  of  commodities, throughout  Australia  and  extensively  in  Southeast  and 
Central Asia, Africa, North and South America, and Europe.  
Mr. Haynes has held technical positions with both BHP Minerals Limited and Billiton plc. He ran his own successful consulting business 
for a number of years providing professional geophysical and exploration services to both junior and major resource companies. He has 
worked extensively on project generation and acquisition throughout his career. Over the past five years he has been intimately involved 
in the incorporation and initial public offerings of several resources companies, and in the ongoing financing and management of these 
companies. 
Mr. Haynes is a Director of Overland Resources Limited (appointed 9 May 2005) and Black Range Minerals Limited (appointed 27 June 
2005).  Mr Haynes was a Director of Iberian Resources Limited (appointed 21 October 2003, resigned 31 July 2007), Bellamel Mining 
Limited (appointed 16 May 2007, resigned 31 December 2008) and Elk Petroleum Limited (appointed 19 January 2005, resigned 8 April 
2005). 

Michael Fowler, (Managing Director) 
Michael Fowler is a geologist with 20 years industry experience.  Mr Fowler graduated from Curtin University in 1988 with a Bachelor 
of  Applied Science degree majoring in geology and in 1999 received a Master of Science majoring in Ore Deposit Geology from the 
University of Western Australia.  On graduating he explored for gold and base metals for Dominion Mining in the Murchison, Gascoyne 
and Eastern Goldfields Regions of Western Australia.   
In 1996, Mr Fowler joined Croesus Mining NL and was made Exploration Manager in 1997.  He oversaw all exploration for Croesus 
until June 2004 and was then appointed Business Development Manager and then Managing Director in October 2005.  Mr Fowler has 
been responsible for the discovery and development of several significant gold deposits.  He has been heavily involved in a number of 
significant acquisitions and project reviews.  Mr Fowler is currently working as Exploration Manager for Castle Minerals, and within the 
last 3 years he was a Non Executive Director of Azure Minerals Limited (resigned September 2007). 

Graeme Smith, (Non Executive Director) 
Graeme Smith is a finance professional with over 20 years experience in accounting and company administration.  He graduated from 
Macquarie University with a Bachelor of Economics degree and has since received a Master of Business Administration and a Master of 
Commercial  Law.    He  is  a  Fellow  of  both  the  Australian  Society  of  Certified  Practicing  Accountants  and  the  Chartered  Institute  of 
Secretaries and Administrators.   
Mr Smith has held CFO and Company Secretary positions with other Australian mining and mining service companies. Mr Smith is a 
director of Buxton Resources Limited. Mr Smith has not held any former directorships in the last 3 years. 

COMPANY SECRETARY  
Graeme Smith 

Interests in the shares and options of the company and related bodies corporate 
As at the date of this report, the interests of the directors in the shares and options of Genesis Minerals Limited were: 

Michael Haynes 
Michael Fowler 
Graeme Smith 

 Ordinary 
Shares 

660,000 
2,000,000 
60,000 

Options over 
Ordinary 
Shares 

1,000,000 
5,000,000 
500,000 

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES 
The principal activities of the Group during the year were the acquisition of mining tenements, and the exploration of these tenements 
with the objective of identifying economic mineral deposits. 

DIVIDENDS 
No dividends were paid or declared during the year. No recommendation for payment of dividends has been made. 

10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Directors' Report continued 

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW 

Finance Review 
The Group has recorded an operating loss after income tax for the year ended 30 June 2010 of $775,286 (2009: $1,434,649). 
At 30 June 2010 cash assets available totalled $219,252 (2009: $286,034). 

Operating Results for the Year 
Summarised operating results are as follows: 

Group revenues and loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense 

Shareholder Returns 

Basic loss per share (cents) 

2010 

Revenues 
$ 

Results 
$ 

11,106 

(775,286) 

2010 

(2.5) 

2009 

(5.6) 

Risk Management 
The board is responsible for ensuring that risks, and also opportunities, are identified on a timely basis and that activities are aligned with 
the risks and opportunities identified by the board. 
The  Group  believes  that it is  crucial  for  all  board  members  to  be  a  part  of  this  process,  and  as  such  the  board  has not  established  a 
separate risk management committee. 
The  board  has  a  number  of  mechanisms  in  place  to  ensure  that  management's  objectives  and  activities  are  aligned  with  the  risks 
identified by the board.  These include the following: 
•  Board approval of a strategic plan, which encompasses strategy statements designed to meet stakeholders needs and manage business 

risk. 
Implementation of board approved operating plans and budgets and board monitoring of progress against these budgets. 

• 

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS 
The Group raised a total of $717,075 through the issue of 8,467,500 ordinary shares to institutional and sophisticated investors from  two 
separate placements in August 2009 and February 2010. Funds raised are being used to actively pursue the Group’s exploration projects. 

AFTER BALANCE DATE EVENTS 
No  matters  or  circumstances,  besides  those  disclosed  at  note  19,  have  arisen  since  the  end  of  the  financial  year  which  significantly 
affected or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in 
future financial years. 

LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS 
The  Group  expects  to  maintain  the  present  status  and  level  of  operations  and  hence  there  are  no  likely  developments  in  the  entity's 
operations.  

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE 
The Group is subject to significant environmental regulation in respect to its exploration activities. 
The  Group  aims  to  ensure  the  appropriate  standard  of  environmental  care  is  achieved,  and  in  doing  so,  that  it  is  aware  of  and  is  in 
compliance with all environmental legislation. The directors of the Group are not aware of any breach of environmental legislation for 
the year under review. 
The  directors  have  considered  the  recently  enacted  National  Greenhouse  and  Energy  Reporting  Act  2007  (the  NGER  Act)  which 
introduces  a single  national reporting  framework  for  the  reporting  and  dissemination  of  information  about  greenhouse  gas  emissions, 
greenhouse  gas  projects,  and  energy  use  and  production  of  corporations.  At  the  current  stage  of  development,  the  directors  have 
determined  that  the  NGER  Act  will  have  no  effect  on  the  Group  for  the  current,  nor  subsequent,  financial  year.  The  directors  will 
reassess this position as and when the need arises. 

11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Directors' Report continued 

REMUNERATION REPORT 
The information provided in this remuneration report has been audited as required by section 308(3C) of the Corporations Act 2001. 

Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration 

Remuneration Policy 
The remuneration policy of Genesis Minerals Limited has been designed to align director and executive objectives with shareholder and 
business objectives by providing a fixed remuneration component and offering specific long-term incentives based on key performance 
areas affecting the Group’s financial results. The board of Genesis Minerals Limited believes the remuneration policy to be appropriate 
and effective in its ability to attract and retain the best executives and directors to run and manage the Group. 
The board’s policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration for board members and senior executives of the Group is as 
follows:   
The remuneration policy, setting the terms and conditions for the executive directors and other senior executives, was developed by the 
board. All executives receive a base salary (which is based on factors such as length of service and experience) and superannuation. The 
board reviews executive packages annually by reference to the Group’s performance, executive performance and comparable information 
from industry sectors and other listed companies in similar industries. 
The board may exercise discretion in relation to approving incentives, bonuses and options. The policy is designed to attract the highest 
calibre of executives and reward them for performance that results in long-term growth in shareholder wealth. 
Executives are also entitled to participate in the employee share and option arrangements. 
The executive directors and executives receive a superannuation guarantee contribution required by the government, which is currently 
9%, and do not receive any other retirement benefits. 
All  remuneration  paid  to  directors  and  executives  is  valued  at  the  cost  to  the  company  and  expensed.  Options  are  valued  using  the 
Black-Scholes methodology. 
The  board  policy  is  to  remunerate  non-executive  directors  at  market  rates  for  comparable  companies  for  time,  commitment  and 
responsibilities. The board determines payments to the non-executive directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on market 
practice, duties and accountability. Independent external advice is sought when required. The maximum aggregate amount of fees that 
can be paid to non-executive directors is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting (currently $300,000). Fees 
for  non-executive  directors  are  not  linked  to  the  performance  of  the  Group.  However,  to  align  directors’  interests  with  shareholder 
interests, the directors are encouraged to hold shares in the company and are able to participate in the employee option plan. 

Performance based remuneration  
The company currently has no performance based remuneration component built into director and executive remuneration packages. 

Group performance, shareholder wealth and directors' and executives' remuneration 
The remuneration  policy  has  been  tailored  to increase  the  direct positive  relationship between  shareholders  investment  objectives and 
directors and executives performance. The Group plans to facilitate this process by directors and executives participating in future option 
issues to encourage the alignment of personal and shareholder interests. The Group believes this policy will be effective in increasing 
shareholder wealth. For details of directors and executives interests in options at year end, refer to note 13 of the financial statements. 

Details of remuneration 
Details  of  the  remuneration  of  the  directors,  the  key  management  personnel  of  the  Group  (as  defined  in  AASB  124  Related  Party 
Disclosures) and specified executives of Genesis Minerals Limited and the Genesis Minerals Group are set out in the following table. 
The key management personnel of Genesis Minerals Limited include the directors and company secretary as per page 10 above. 
Given  the  size  and  nature  of  operations  of  Genesis  Minerals  Limited,  there  are  no  other  employees  who  are  required  to  have  their 
remuneration disclosed in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. 

12 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Directors' Report continued 

Key management personnel and other executives of Genesis Minerals Limited 

Short-Term 

Post Employment 

Share-based 
Payments 

  Total 

Directors 
Michael Haynes 
2010 
2009 
Michael Fowler 
2010 
2009 

Graeme Smith 

2010 
2009 

Salary 
 & Fees 
$ 

54,500 
54,500 

160,000 
160,000 

30,000 
30,000 

Total key management personnel compensation 

2010 
2009 

244,500 
244,500 

Non Monetary  Superannuation 

$ 

$ 

Retirement 
benefits 
$ 

Options 
$ 

$ 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

16,000 
16,000 

2,700 
1,350 

18,700 
17,350 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 
- 

- 

54,500 
54,500 

176,000 
176,000 

32,700 
31,350 

263,200 
261,850 

Service agreements 
On 25 June 2007 the Company entered into an Executive Service Agreement with Mr Michael Fowler.   
Under the Agreement, Mr Michael Fowler is engaged by the Company to provide services to the Company in the capacity of Managing 
Director and CEO.   
Mr Fowler is to be paid a salary of $176,000 per annum, (inclusive of superannuation entitlement). 
The Agreement is effective from the date the Company was admitted to the Official List (30 July 2007) and continues until terminated by 
either  Mr  Fowler  or  the  Company.  Mr  Fowler  is  entitled  to  a  minimum  notice  period  of  three  months  from  the  Company  and  the 
Company is entitled to a minimum notice period of three months from Mr Fowler. 

Share-based compensation 
There was no share-based compensation issued to key management personnel during the year. 

DIRECTORS' MEETINGS 
During the financial year five meetings of directors were held. Attendances by each director during the year were as follows: 
Directors Meetings 

Michael Haynes 
Michael Fowler 
Graeme Smith 

A 

5 
5 
5 

B 

5 
5 
5 

Notes 
A – Number of meetings attended. 
B – Number of meetings held during the time the director held office during the year.  

SHARES UNDER OPTION 
At the date of this report there are 14,400,000 unissued ordinary shares in respect of which options are outstanding. 

Balance at the beginning of the year 

Movements of share options during the year 
Issued, exercisable at 10 cents, on or before 30 June 2011 
Issued, exercisable at 15 cents, on or before 23 August 2013 
Issued, exercisable at 20 cents, on or before 23 August 2013 

Total number of options outstanding as at 30 June 2010 and the date of this report 

Number of options  

9,750,000 

4,500,000 
75,000 
75,000 

14,400,000 

13 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Directors' Report continued 

The balance is comprised of the following: 

Expiry date 
30 June 2011 
23 August 2013 
23 August 2013 
28 February 2013 
15 May 2012 

Total number of options outstanding at the date of this report  

Exercise price (cents) 
10 
15 
20 
20 
20 

Number of options 

4,500,000 
75,000 
75,000 
500,000 
9,250,000 

14,400,000 

No person entitled to exercise any option referred to above has or had, by virtue of the option, a right to participate in any share issue of 
any other body corporate. 

INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS  
During or since the financial year, the company has paid premiums insuring all the directors of Genesis Minerals Limited against costs 
incurred in defending proceedings for conduct involving: 
     (a) a wilful breach of duty; or  
     (b) a contravention of sections 182 or 183 of the Corporations Act 2001,  
as permitted by section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001.  
The total amount of insurance contract premiums paid is $8,904 (2009: $6,161). 

NON-AUDIT SERVICES 
There were no non-audit services provided by the entity's auditor, Bentleys, or associated entities. 

PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY 
No  person  has  applied  to  the  Court  under  section  237  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001  for  leave  to  bring  proceedings  on  behalf  of  the 
company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the 
company for all or any part of those proceedings. 
No  proceedings  have  been  brought  or  intervened  in  on  behalf  of  the  company  with  leave  of  the  Court  under  section  237  of  the 
Corporations Act 2001. 

GOING CONCERN 
The  accounts  have  been  prepared  on  the  going  concern  basis,  which  contemplates  continuity  of  normal  business  activities  and  the 
realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Group incurred a loss from ordinary activities of 
$775,286 for the year ended 30 June 2010 (2009: $1,434,649). Included within this loss was the write off of exploration expenditure of 
$144,284 (2009: $937,594). 
The net working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2010 was $156,455 (2009: $222,673) and the net decrease in cash held during 
the year was $66,483 (2009: $877,286). 
The  ability  of  the  Group  to  continue  to  pay  its  debts  as  and  when  they  fall  due  is  dependent  upon  the  Group  successfully  raising 
additional share capital and ultimately developing one of its mineral properties. 
The Directors believe it is appropriate to prepare these accounts on a going concern basis because: 

• 

• 

at the date of this report, the Company has completed a capital raising of $247,000 and also a fully underwritten Entitlements Issue 
which will raise $1.1 million. 
the  Directors  have  an  appropriate  plan  to  contain  certain  operating  and  exploration  expenditure  if  additional  required  funding  is 
unavailable. 

 Refer to note 1(a) for further details. 

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 
A copy of the auditor's independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on page 15. 

This Report of the Directors, incorporating the Remuneration Report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors. 

Michael Fowler  
Managing Director 
Perth, 30 September 2010  

14 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To The Board of Directors 

Auditor’s  Independence  Declaration  under  Section  307C  of  the  Corporations 
Act 2001 

This declaration is made in connection with our audit of the financial report of Genesis Minerals Limited 

and Controlled Entities for the year ended 30 June 2010 and in accordance with the provisions of the 

Corporations Act 2001. 

We declare that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, there have been: 

  no  contraventions  of  the  auditor  independence  requirements  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001  in 

relation to the audit; 

  no contraventions of the Code of Professional Conduct of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in 

Australia in relation to the audit. 

Yours faithfully 

BENTLEYS 
Chartered Accountants 

CHRIS WATTS CA 
Director 

DATED at PERTH this 30th day of September 2010 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Corporate Governance Statement 

The Board of Directors 
The  company's  constitution  provides  that  the  number  of  directors  shall  not  be  less  than  three  and  not  more  than  nine.    There  is  no 
requirement for any share holding qualification. 
As  and  if  the  company's  activities  increase  in  size,  nature  and  scope  the  size  of  the  Board  will  be  reviewed  periodically,  and  as 
circumstances demand. The optimum number of directors required to supervise adequately the company's constitution will be determined 
within the limitations imposed by the constitution. 
The membership of the Board, its activities and composition, is subject to periodic review.  The criteria for determining the identification 
and appointment of a suitable candidate for the Board shall include quality of the individual, background of experience and achievement, 
compatibility with other Board members, credibility within the company's scope of activities, intellectual ability to contribute to Board's 
duties and physical ability to undertake Board's duties and responsibilities. 
Directors are initially appointed by the full Board subject to election by shareholders at the next general meeting. Under the company's 
constitution the tenure of a director (other than managing director, and only one managing director where the position is jointly held) is 
subject  to  reappointment  by  shareholders  not  later  than  the  third  anniversary  following  his  or  her  last  appointment.  Subject  to  the 
requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, the Board does not subscribe to the principle of retirement age and there is no maximum 
period of service as a director. A managing director may be appointed for any period and on any terms the directors think fit and, subject 
to the terms of any agreement entered into, may revoke any appointment. 
The Board considers that the company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity to justify the formation of separate 
or special committees (other than an Audit Committee) at this time.  The Board as a whole is able to address the governance aspects of 
the full scope of the company's activities and to ensure that it adheres to appropriate ethical standards. 

Role of the Board 
The Board's primary role is the protection and enhancement of long-term shareholder value. 
To fulfil this role, the Board is responsible for oversight of management and the overall corporate governance of the company including 
its strategic direction, establishing goals for management and monitoring the achievement of these goals. 

Appointments to Other Boards 
Directors are required to take into consideration any potential conflicts of interest when accepting appointments to other boards. 

Independent Professional Advice 
The Board has determined that individual directors have the right in connection with their duties and responsibilities as directors, to seek 
independent professional advice at the company's expense.  With the exception of expenses for legal advice in relation to director's rights 
and duties, the engagement of an outside adviser is subject to prior approval of the Chairman and this will not be withheld unreasonably. 

Continuous Review of Corporate Governance 
Directors consider, on an ongoing basis, how management information is presented to them and whether such information is sufficient to 
enable  them  to  discharge  their  duties  as  directors  of  the  company.    Such  information  must  be  sufficient  to  enable  the  directors  to 
determine appropriate operating and financial strategies from time to time in light of changing circumstances and economic conditions.  
The  directors  recognise  that  mining  exploration  is  an  inherently  risky  business  and  that  operational  strategies  adopted  should, 
notwithstanding, be directed towards improving or maintaining the net worth of the company.  

ASX Principles of Good Corporate Governance 
The Board has reviewed its current practices in light of the revised ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations with a 
view to making amendments where applicable after considering the company's size and the resources it has available. 
As  the  company's  activities develop in  size, nature and  scope, the  size  of  the  Board  and  the  implementation  of  any  additional  formal 
corporate governance committees will be given further consideration. 
The Board has adopted the revised Recommendations and the following table sets out the company's present position in relation to each 
of the revised Principles. 

16 

 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Corporate Governance Statement continued 

  ASX Principle 

Status  Reference/comment 

Principle 1: 

1.1 

1.2 

1.3 

  Lay solid foundations for 
management and oversight 
  Companies should establish the 
functions reserved to the board and 
those delegated to senior executives 
and disclose those functions 
Companies should disclose the 
process for evaluating the 
performance of senior executives 

A 

A 

Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 1 

A 
(in part) 

Matters reserved for the Board are included on the Company website 
in the Corporate Governance Section. 

The remuneration  of  management  and  employees  is reviewed  by  the 
Managing Director and approved by the Board. 
Acting in its ordinary capacity the Board from time to time carries out 
the process of considering and determining performance issues. 
Matters  reserved  for  the  Board  can  be  viewed  on  the  Company 
website. 

A 

A 

A 

A 

N/A 

Given the Group’s background, the nature and size of its business and 
the  current  stage  of  its  development,  the  board  comprises  three 
directors,  two  of  whom  are  non-executive.    The  board  believes  that 
this  is  both  appropriate  and  acceptable  at  this  stage  of  the  Group’s 
development. 

The position of Chairman and Managing Director are held by separate 
persons. 

The  full  Board  is the  Nomination  Committee.  Acting  in  its  ordinary 
capacity  from  time  to  time  as  required,  the  Board  carries  out  the 
process  of  determining  the  need  for  screening  and  appointing  new 
Directors. In view of the size and resources available to the Group it is 
not considered that a separate Nomination Committee would add any 
substance to this process. 
Given  the  size  and  nature  of  the  Group  a  formal  process  for 
performance evaluation has not been developed. 

A 
(in part) 

The skills and experience of the Directors are set out in the Group’s 
Annual Report and on the website. 

A 

The Group has established a Code of Conduct which can be viewed on 
its website. 

Principle 2: 
2.1 

  Structure the board to add value   
  A majority of the board should be 
independent directors 

2.2 

2.3 

2.4 

2.5 

2.6 

Principle 3: 

3.1 

  The chair should be an independent 
director 
  The roles of chair and chief executive 
officer should not be exercised by the 
same individual 
  The board should establish a 
nomination committee 

  Companies should disclose the 
process for evaluating the 
performance of the board, its 
committees and individual directors 
Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 2 

  Promote ethical and responsible 
decision-making 
  Companies should establish a code of 
conduct and disclose the code or a 
summary of the code as to: 
  • 

the practices necessary to 
maintain confidence in the 
company’s integrity 
the practices necessary to take 
into account their legal 
obligations and the reasonable 
expectations of their stakeholders 
the responsibility and 
accountability of individuals for 
reporting and investigating 
reports of unethical practices 

  • 

• 

A = Adopted   
N/A = Not adopted 

17 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Corporate Governance Statement continued 

  ASX Principle 

Status  Reference/comment 

3.2 

3.3 

  Companies should establish a policy 
concerning trading in company 
securities by directors, senior 
executives and employees, and 
disclose the policy or a summary of 
that policy 
  Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 3 

Principle 4: 

4.1 

4.2 

4.3 

4.4 

  • 

  Safeguard integrity in financial 
reporting 
  The board should establish an audit 
committee 
  The audit committee should be 
structured so that it: 
  • 

consists only of non-executive 
directors 
consists of a majority of 
independent directors 
is chaired by an independent 
chair, who is not chair of the 
board 
  • 
has at least three members 
  The audit committee should have a 
formal charter 
  Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 4 

  • 

Principle 5: 

5.1 

5.2 

Principle 6: 
6.1 

6.2 

  Make timely and balanced 
disclosure 
  Companies should establish written 
policies designed to ensure 
compliance with ASX Listing Rule 
disclosure requirements and to ensure 
accountability at a senior executive 
level for that compliance and disclose 
those policies or a summary of those 
policies 
  Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 5 

  Respect the rights of shareholders  
  Companies should design a 
communications policy for 
promoting effective communication 
with shareholders and encouraging 
their participation at general meetings 
and disclose their policy or a 
summary of that policy 
Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 6 

A 

The  Group  has  formulated  a  securities  trading  policy,  which  can  be 
viewed on its website. 

A 

A 

A 

A 

A 

N/A 
A 

A 

A 

A 

A 

The Company only has two non-executive directors. 

Directors must obtain the approval of the Chairman of the Board and 
notify  the  Company  Secretary  before  they  buy  or  sell  shares  in  the 
Company, and it is subject to Board veto. Directors must provide the 
information  required  by  the  Company  to  ensure  Compliance  with 
Listing Rule 3.19A. 

The  Board  receives  monthly  reports  on  the  status  of  the  Group’s 
activities and any new proposed activities. Disclosure is reviewed as a 
routine agenda item at each Board Meeting. 

In  line  with  adherence  to  continuous  disclosure  requirements  of  the 
ASX  all  shareholders  are  kept  informed  of  major  developments 
affecting  the  Group.  This  disclosure  is  through  regular  shareholder 
communications  including  the  Annual  report,  Quarterly  Reports,  the 
Company  Website  and the  distributions  of  specific  releases  covering 
major transactions and events. 

A 

The Group has formulated a Communication Policy which is included 
in its Corporate Governance Statement on the Company Website.  

A = Adopted     
N/A = Not adopted 

18 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Corporate Governance Statement continued 

  ASX Principle 

Status  Reference/comment 

Principle 7: 
7.1 

  Recognise and manage risk 
  Companies should establish policies 
for the oversight and management of 
material business risks and disclose a 
summary of those policies 

7.2 

7.3 

7.4 

Principle 8: 
8.1 

8.2 

8.3 

  The board should require 
management to design and 
implement the risk management and 
internal control system to manage the 
company’s material business risks 
and report to it on whether those risks 
are being managed effectively.  The 
board should disclose that 
management has reported to it as to 
the effectiveness of the company’s 
management of its material business 
risks 
  The board should disclose whether it 
has received assurance from the chief 
executive officer (or equivalent) and 
the chief financial officer (or 
equivalent) that the declaration 
provided in accordance with section 
295A of the Corporations Act is 
founded on a sound system of risk 
management and internal control and 
that the system is operating 
effectively in all material respects in 
relation to financial reporting risks 
Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 7 

  Remunerate fairly and responsibly 
  The board should establish a 
remuneration committee 
Companies should clearly distinguish 
the structure of non-executive 
directors’ remuneration from that of 
executive directors and senior 
executives 
Companies should provide the 
information indicated in the Guide to 
reporting on Principle 8 

N/A  While  the  Group  does  not  have  formalised  policies  on  risk 
management  the  Board  recognises  its  responsibility  for  identifying 
areas  of  significant  business  risk  and  for  ensuring  that  arrangements 
are  in  place  for  adequately  managing  these  risks.    This  issue  is 
regularly reviewed at Board meetings and risk management culture is 
encouraged amongst employees and contractors. 

Determined areas of risk which are regularly considered include:   
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

performance and funding of exploration activities 
budget control and asset protection 
status of mineral tenements 
compliance with government laws and regulations 
safety and the environment 
continuous disclosure obligations 

N/A  While the Group does not have formalised risk management policies it 
recognises  its  responsibility  for  identifying  areas  of  significant 
business  risk  and  ensuring  that  arrangements  are  in  place  to 
adequately  manage  these  risks.  This  issue  is  regularly  reviewed  at 
Board meetings and a risk management culture is encouraged amongst 
employees and contractors. 

A 

Assurances received from CEO and CFO (or equivalent) each year. 

A 

A 

A 

A 

Refer to the Annual Report and the Corporate Governance section of 
the Company’s website. 

A = Adopted     
N/A = Not adopted 

19 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 

REVENUE 

EXPENDITURE 
Depreciation expense 
Salaries and employee benefits expense 
Exploration expenses 
Impairment expense 
Corporate expenses 
Administration costs 
Share based payments expense 

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX 

INCOME TAX BENEFIT / (EXPENSE) 

LOSS FOR THE YEAR 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations 
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 

Notes 

4 

22 

5 

6 

2010 

$ 

11,106 

(3,501) 
(363,826) 
(144,284) 
(12,045) 
(104,603) 
(125,208) 
(32,925) 

2009 

$ 
32,497 

(3,272) 
(122,952) 
(937,594) 
(84,183) 
(147,467) 
(171,678) 
- 

(775,286) 

(1,434,649) 

- 

- 

(775,286) 

(1,434,649) 

6,257 
6,257 

23,895 
23,895 

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ATTRIBUTABLE TO 
MEMBERS OF GENESIS MINERALS LIMITED 

(769,029) 

(1,410,754) 

Basic loss per share (cents per share) 

21 

(2.5) 

(5.6) 

The above Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

20 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 

AT 30 JUNE 2010 

CURRENT ASSETS 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 

NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
Plant and equipment 
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS 

TOTAL ASSETS 

CURRENT LIABILITIES 
Trade and other payables 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 

TOTAL LIABILITIES 

NET ASSETS 

EQUITY 
Issued capital 
Reserves 
Accumulated losses 

TOTAL EQUITY 

Notes 

7 
8 

9 

10 

2010 

$ 

219,252 
9,432 
228,684 

892 
892 

2009 

$ 

286,034 
4,662 
290,696 

4,393 
4,393 

229,576 

295,089 

72,229 
72,229 

72,229 

68,023 
68,023 

68,023 

157,347 

227,066 

11 
12(a) 

4,268,799 
127,256 
(4,238,708) 

3,602,414 
88,074 
(3,463,422) 

157,347 

227,066 

The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

21 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity  

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 

BALANCE AT 1 JULY 2008 
Loss for the year 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
Exchange differences on translation of 
foreign operations 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS IN THEIR 
CAPACITY AS OWNERS 
Shares issued during the year 
Share issue transaction costs 

Notes 

Ordinary Share 
Capital 
$ 

Options 
Reserve 
$ 

Foreign 
Currency 
Translation 
Reserve 
$ 

Accumulated 
Losses 
$ 

Total 
$ 

2,954,849 
- 

63,550 
- 

629 
- 

(2,028,773) 
(1,434,649) 

990,255 
(1,434,649) 

12(a) 

- 
- 

11 
11 

690,000 
(42,435) 

- 
- 

- 
- 

23,895 
23,895 

- 
(1,434,649) 

23,895 
(1,410,754) 

- 
- 

- 
- 

690,000 
(42,435) 

BALANCE AT 30 JUNE 2009 
Loss for the year 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
Exchange differences on translation of 
foreign operations 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS IN THEIR 
CAPACITY AS OWNERS 
Shares issued during the year 
Share issue transaction costs 
Share based payments 

12(a) 

11 
11 
12(a) 

3,602,414 

63,550 

24,524 

(3,463,422) 

227,066 

- 

- 
- 

- 

- 
- 

- 

(775,286) 

(775,286) 

6,257 
6,257 

- 
(775,286) 

6,257 
(769,029) 

717,075 
(50,690) 
- 

- 
- 
32,925 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

717,075 
(50,690) 
32,925 

BALANCE AT 30 JUNE 2010 

4,268,799 

96,475 

30,781 

(4,238,708) 

157,347 

The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

22 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 

YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2010 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
Payments to suppliers and employees 
Payments for exploration expenditure 
Interest received 
NET CASH OUTFLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES  

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
Proceeds from issues of ordinary shares 
Payments of share issue costs 
NET CASH INFLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year 
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 

Notes 

20 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR 

7 

2010 

$ 

(589,024) 
(154,950) 
11,106 
(732,868) 

717,075 
(50,690) 
666,385 

(66,483) 
286,034 
(299) 

219,252 

2009 

$ 

(430,643) 
(1,126,705) 
32,497 
(1,524,851) 

690,000 
(42,435) 
647,565 

(877,286) 
1,147,395 
15,925 

286,034 

The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

23 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

The  principal  accounting  policies  adopted  in  the  preparation  of  the  financial  statements  are  set  out  below.  These  policies  have  been 
consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. The financial statements are for the Group consisting of Genesis 
Minerals Limited and its subsidiaries (“the Group”). The financial statements are presented in the Australian currency. Genesis Minerals 
Limited is a company limited by shares, domiciled and incorporated in Australia. The financial statements were authorised for issue by 
the directors on 30 September 2010. The directors have the power to amend and reissue the financial statements. 

(a) Basis of preparation 
These general purpose financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, other authoritative 
pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, Australian Accounting Interpretations and the Corporations Act 2001. 

Compliance with IFRS 
The consolidated financial statements of the Genesis Minerals Limited Group comply with International Financial Reporting Standards 
(IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 

Historical cost convention 
These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available-for-sale 
financial assets, financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss, certain classes of 
property, plant and equipment and investment property. 

Financial statement presentation 
The  Group  has  applied  the revised  AASB  101  Presentation of  Financial  Statements  which became effective  on  1  January  2009. The 
revised standard requires the separate presentation of a statement of  comprehensive income and a statement of  changes in equity.  All 
non-owner changes in equity must now be presented in the statement of comprehensive income. As a consequence, the Group had to 
change the presentation of its financial statements. Comparative information has been re-presented so that it is also in conformity with 
the revised standard. 

Going concern 
The  accounts  have  been  prepared  on  the  going  concern  basis,  which  contemplates  continuity  of  normal  business  activities  and  the 
realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Group incurred a loss from ordinary activities of 
$775,286 for the year ended 30 June 2010 (2009: $1,434,649). Included within this loss was the write off of exploration expenditure of 
$144,284 (2009: $937,594). 
The net working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2010 was $156,455 (2009: $222,673) and the net decrease in cash held during 
the year was $66,483 (2009: $877,286). 
The  ability  of  the  Group  to  continue  to  pay  its  debts  as  and  when  they  fall  due  is  dependent  upon  the  Group  successfully  raising 
additional share capital and ultimately developing one of its mineral properties. 
The Directors believe it is appropriate to prepare these accounts on a going concern basis because: 

• 

the Directors have an appropriate plan to raise additional funds as and when it is required. In light of the Group’s current exploration 
projects,  the  Directors  believe  that  the  additional  capital  required  can  be  raised  in  the  market.  Refer  to  note  19  for  details  of  a 
successful capital placement after the reporting date; and 
the Directors have an appropriate plan to contain certain operating and exploration expenditure if appropriate funding is unavailable. 

• 
Should the Group not be successful in its planned capital raisings, it may be necessary to sell some of its assets, farm out exploration 
projects, reduce exploration expenditure by various methods including surrendering less prospective tenements. Although the Directors 
believe  that they  will  be  successful  in these  measures, if  they  are  not,  the  Group  may  be  unable  to  continue  as  a  going  concern  and 
therefore may be unable to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the 
financial report. 

(b) Principles of consolidation 
Subsidiaries 
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Genesis Minerals Limited (“Company” or 
“parent  entity”)  as  at  30  June  2010  and  the  results  of  all  subsidiaries  for  the  year  then  ended.  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  and  its 
subsidiaries together are referred to in this financial report as the Group. 
Subsidiaries are all entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating 
policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting 
rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity. 
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date 
that control ceases. 
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations by the Group. 

24 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are 
also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries 
have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. 
Non-controlling interests in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive 
income, statement of changes in equity and statement of financial position respectively. 
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the separate financial statements of Genesis Minerals Limited. 

(ii) Changes in ownership interests 
The Group treats transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in a loss of control as transactions with equity owners of 
the Group. A change in ownership interest results in an adjustment between the carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling 
interests  to  reflect  their  relative  interests  in  the  subsidiary.  Any  difference  between  the  amount  of  the  adjustment  to  non-controlling 
interests  and  any  consideration  paid  or  received  is  recognised  in  a  separate  reserve  within  equity  attributable  to  owners  of  Genesis 
Minerals Limited. 
When the Group ceases to have control, joint control or significant influence, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair 
value with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of 
subsequently  accounting  for  the  retained interest  as  an  associate, jointly  controlled entity  or  financial  asset.  In  addition,  any  amounts 
previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the group had directly disposed of 
the  related  assets  or liabilities.  This  may  mean that amounts previously  recognised  in  other  comprehensive  income  are reclassified to 
profit or loss. 
If the ownership interest in a jointly controlled entity or associate is reduced but joint control or significant influence is retained, only a 
proportionate  share  of  the  amounts  previously  recognised  in  other  comprehensive  income  are  reclassified  to  profit  or  loss  where 
appropriate. 

(iii) Changes in accounting policy 
The Group has changed its accounting policy for transactions with non-controlling interests and the accounting for loss of control, joint 
control or significant influence from 1 July 2009 when a revised AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements became 
operative.  The  revisions  to  AASB  127  contained  consequential  amendments to  AASB  128  Investments in  Associates  and  AASB  131 
Interests in Joint Ventures. 
Previously transactions with non-controlling interests were treated as transactions with parties external to the Group. Disposals therefore 
resulted  in  gains  or  losses  in  profit  or  loss  and  purchases  resulted  in  the  recognition  of  goodwill.  On  disposal  or  partial  disposal,  a 
proportionate interest in reserves attributable to the subsidiary was reclassified to profit or loss or directly to retained earnings. 
Previously  when  the  Group  ceased  to  have  control,  joint  control  or  significant  influence  over  an  entity,  the  carrying  amount  of  the 
investment at the date control, joint control or significant influence ceased became its cost for the purposes of subsequently accounting 
for the retained interests as associates, jointly controlled entity of financial assets. 
The Group has applied the new policy prospectively to transactions occurring on or after 1 July 2009. As a consequence, no adjustments 
were necessary to any of the amounts previously recognised in the financial statements. 

(c) Segment reporting 
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The 
chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has 
been identified as the full Board of Directors. 

Change in accounting policy 
The  Group  has  adopted  AASB  8  Operating  Segments  from  1  July  2009.  AASB  8  replaces  AASB  114  Segment  Reporting.  The new 
standard requires a ‘management approach’, under which segment information is presented on the same basis as that used for internal 
reporting purposes. For management purposes, the Group has identified only one reportable segment as exploration activities undertaken 
in Chile. This segment includes activities associated with the determination and assessment of the existence of commercial economic 
reserves, from the Group’s mineral assets in this geographic location. This represents a decrease in the number of reportable segments 
presented with comparatives for 2009 having been restated. 

(d) Foreign currency translation 
(i) Functional and presentation currency 
Items  included  in  the  financial  statements  of  each  of  the  Group’s  entities  are  measured  using  the  currency  of  the  primary  economic 
environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian 
dollars, which is Genesis Minerals Limited's functional and presentation currency. 

25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
(ii) Transactions and balances 
Foreign  currency  transactions  are  translated  into  the  functional  currency  using  the  exchange  rates  prevailing  at  the  dates  of  the 
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year end 
exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss, except when they are 
deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges or are attributable to part of the net investment in 
a foreign operation. 
Translation differences on financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are reported as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation 
differences  on  non-monetary  financial assets  and liabilities such  as  equities  held at  fair  value through  profit  or  loss  are recognised in 
profit or loss as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets such as equities classified as 
available-for-sale financial assets are included in the fair value reserve in equity. 

(iii) Group companies 
The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a 
functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows: 

• 

• 

assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement 
of financial position; 

income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates  (unless that is not a 
reasonable  approximation  of  the  cumulative  effect  of  the  rates  prevailing  on  the  transaction  dates,  in  which  case  income  and 
expenses are translated at the dates of the transactions); and 

all resulting exchange differences are recognised other comprehensive income. 

• 
On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of any net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other 
financial  instruments  designated  as  hedges  of  such  investments,  are  recognised  in  other  comprehensive  income.  When  a  foreign 
operation is sold or any borrowings forming part of the net investment are repaid, a proportionate share of such exchange differences is 
reclassified to profit or loss, as part of the gain or loss on sale where applicable. 
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entities 
and translated at the closing rate. 

(e) Revenue recognition 
Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial assets. 

(f) Income tax 
The  income  tax expense  or  revenue  for  the  period  is the tax payable  on  the  current  period’s taxable  income  based  on  the  applicable 
income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences and to 
unused tax losses. 
The  current  income  tax  charge is  calculated  on  the  basis  of  the tax  laws  enacted  or  substantively  enacted at the  end  of  the  reporting 
period in the countries where the Company’s subsidiaries and associated operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically 
evaluates  positions  taken  in  tax  returns  with  respect  to  situations  in  which  applicable  tax  regulation  is  subject  to  interpretation.  It 
establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. 
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and 
liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it 
arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction 
affects neither accounting nor taxable profit nor loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted 
or  substantially  enacted  by  the reporting  date  and  are  expected  to  apply  when  the  related deferred  income  tax asset  is  realised  or  the 
deferred income tax liability is settled. 
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable 
amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses. 
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments 
in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable 
that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when 
the  deferred tax  balances  relate to  the  same  taxation  authority.  Current tax assets  and tax liabilities  are  offset  where the  entity  has  a 
legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. 
Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive 
income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively. 

26 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
(g) Leases 
Leases  of  property,  plant  and  equipment  where  the  Group,  as  lessee,  has  substantially  all  the  risks  and  rewards  of  ownership  are 
classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the lease’s inception at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the 
present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in other short-
term and long-term payables. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The finance cost is charged to profit 
or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. 
The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease 
term. 
Leases  where  a  significant  portion  of  the  risks  and rewards  of  ownership  are  not  transferred to  the  Group  as  lessee  are  classified  as 
operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to profit or loss on a 
straight-line basis over the period of the lease. 

(h) Impairment of assets 
Goodwill and intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment, 
or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired. Other assets are reviewed for impairment 
whenever  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the  carrying  amount  may  not  be  recoverable.  An  impairment  loss  is 
recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of 
an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels 
for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of 
assets (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the 
impairment at each reporting date. 

(i) Cash and cash equivalents 
For statement of cash flows presentation purposes, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial 
institutions,  other  short-term  highly  liquid investments  with  original  maturities  of  three  months  or  less  that are readily  convertible  to 
known amounts of cash and which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown 
within borrowings in current liabilities on the statement of financial position. 

(j) Trade and other receivables 
Receivables are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less a provision for any uncollectible debts. An estimate for doubtful 
debts is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written-off as incurred. 

(k) Investments and other financial assets 
Classification 
The Group classifies its investments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, 
held-to-maturity investments and available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments 
were acquired. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition and, in the case of assets classified as 
held-to-maturity, re-evaluates this designation at each reporting date. 

(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if 
acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are classified as held for trading unless they are designated 
as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets. 

(ii) Loans and receivables 
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. 
They are included in current assets, except for those with maturities greater than 12 months after the reporting date which are classified 
as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are included in trade and other receivables in the statement of financial position. 

(iii) Held-to-maturity investments 
Held-to-maturity  investments  are  non-derivative  financial  assets  with  fixed  or  determinable  payments  and  fixed  maturities  that  the 
Group’s  management  has  the  positive  intention  and  ability  to  hold  to  maturity.  If  the  Group  were  to  sell  other  than  an  insignificant 
amount of held-to-maturity financial assets, the whole category would be tainted and reclassified as available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity 
financial assets are included in non-current assets, except for those with maturities less than 12 months from the reporting date, which are 
classified as current assets. 

27 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
(iv) Available-for-sale financial assets 
Available-for-sale financial assets, comprising principally marketable equity securities, are non-derivatives that are either designated in 
this  category  or  not  classified  in  any  of  the  other  categories.  They  are  included  in  non-current  assets  unless  management  intends  to 
dispose of the investment within 12 months of the reporting date. Investments are designated available-for-sale if they do not have fixed 
maturities and fixed or determinable payments and management intends to hold them for the medium to long term. 

Financial assets - reclassification 
The Group may choose to reclassify a non-derivative trading financial asset out of the held-for-trading category if the financial asset is 
no  longer  held  for  the  purpose  of  selling  it  in  the  near  term.  Financial  assets  other  than  loans  and  receivables  are  permitted  to  be 
reclassified out of the held-for-trading category only in rare circumstances arising from a single event that is unusual and highly unlikely 
to recur in the near term. In addition, the Group may  choose to reclassify  financial assets that would meet the definition of loans and 
receivables out of the held-for-trading or available-for-sale categories if the Group has the intention and ability to hold these financial 
assets for the foreseeable future or until maturity at the date of reclassification. 
Reclassifications are made at fair value as of the reclassification date. Fair value becomes the new cost or amortised cost as applicable, 
and  no  reversals  of  fair  value  gains  or losses recorded  before  reclassification  date are  subsequently  made.  Effective  interest rates  for 
financial assets reclassified to loans and receivables and held-to-maturity categories are determined at the reclassification date. Further 
increases in estimates of cash flows adjust effective interest rates prospectively. 

Change in accounting policy 
The  Group  has  adopted  the  policy  of  reclassifying  financial  assets  out  of  the  held-for-trading  category  from  1  July  2009,  following 
amendments made to AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement in October 2009. Under the Group’s previous 
policy reclassifications of financial assets were not permitted. The Group did not reclassify any financial assets in the current reporting 
period. Therefore, the change in accounting policy had no impact on the Group’s financial statements. 

Recognition and derecognition 
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell 
the asset. Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through 
profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value and transaction costs are 
expensed to the statement of comprehensive income. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the 
financial assets have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. 
When securities classified as available-for-sale are sold, the accumulated fair value adjustments recognised in equity are included in the 
statement of comprehensive income as gains and losses from investment securities. 

Subsequent measurement 
Loans and receivables and held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. 
Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Gains or 
losses arising from changes in the fair value of the ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’ category are presented in the 
statement  of  comprehensive  income  within  other income  or  other  expenses  in the  period  in  which  they  arise.  Dividend  income  from 
financial  assets  at  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss  is  recognised  in  the  statement  of  comprehensive  income  as  part  of  revenue  from 
continuing operations when the Group’s right to receive payments is established. 
Changes  in  the  fair  value  of  monetary  securities  denominated  in  a  foreign  currency  and  classified  as  available-for-sale  are  analysed 
between translation differences resulting from changes in amortised cost of the security and other changes in the carrying amount of the 
security.  The  translation  differences  related  to  changes  in  the  amortised  cost  are  recognised  in  profit  or  loss,  and  other  changes  in 
carrying  amount  are  recognised  in  equity.  Changes  in  the  fair  value  of  other  monetary  and  non-monetary  securities  classified  as 
available-for-sale are recognised in equity. 
Details on how the fair value of financial investments is determined are disclosed in note 2. 

Impairment 
The Group assesses at each balance date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. 
In the case of equity securities classified as available-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of a security below its 
cost is considered as an indicator that the securities are impaired. If any such evidence exists for available-for-sale financial assets, the 
cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that 
financial  asset  previously  recognised  in  profit  or  loss  –  is  removed  from  equity  and  recognised  in  the  statement  of  comprehensive 
income. Impairment losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income on equity instruments classified as available-for-sale 
are not reversed through the statement of comprehensive income. 
If there is evidence of impairment for any of the Group’s financial assets carried at amortised cost, the loss is measured as the difference 
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, excluding future credit losses that have not 
been  incurred.  The  cash  flows  are  discounted  at  the  financial  asset’s  original  effective  interest  rate.  The  loss  is  recognised  in  the 
statement of comprehensive income. 

28 

 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
(l) Plant and equipment 
All plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the 
acquisition of the items. 
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable 
that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The 
carrying amount of any component accounted for as a separate asset is derecognised when replaced. All other repairs and maintenance 
are charged to the statement of comprehensive income during the reporting period in which they are incurred. 
Depreciation of plant and equipment is calculated using the reducing balance method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts, net of 
their residual values, over their estimated useful lives or, in the case of leasehold improvements and certain leased plant and equipment, 
the shorter lease term. The rates vary between 20% and 40% per annum. 
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each reporting date. 
An  asset’s  carrying  amount  is  written  down  immediately  to  its  recoverable  amount  if  the  asset’s  carrying  amount  is  greater  than  its 
estimated recoverable amount (note 1(h)). 
Gains  and  losses  on  disposals  are  determined  by  comparing  proceeds  with  carrying  amount.  These  are  included  in  the  statement  of 
comprehensive income. When revalued assets are sold, it is Group policy to transfer the amounts included in other reserves in respect of 
those assets to retained earnings. 

(m) Exploration and evaluation costs 
Exploration and evaluation costs are expensed as incurred. 

(n) Trade and other payables 
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year which are unpaid. 
The amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are paid on normal commercial terms. 

(o) Employee benefits 
(i) Wages and salaries and annual leave 
Liabilities  for  wages  and  salaries, including  non-monetary  benefits,  and  annual leave  expected to  be  settled  within  12  months  of  the 
reporting  date  are  recognised  in  other  payables  in  respect  of  employees’  services  up  to  the  reporting  date  and  are  measured  at  the 
amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. 

(ii)  Share-based payments 
The Group provides benefits to employees (including directors) of the Group in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby 
employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (‘equity-settled transactions’), refer to note 22. 
The  cost  of  these  equity-settled transactions  with employees  is  measured  by  reference  to  the  fair  value at the  date  at  which  they  are 
granted. The fair value is determined by an internal valuation using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. 
The  cost  of  equity-settled  transactions  is  recognised,  together  with  a  corresponding  increase  in  equity,  over  the  period  in  which  the 
performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (‘vesting 
date’). 
The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which 
the vesting period has expired and (ii) the number of options that, in the opinion of the directors of the Group, will ultimately vest. This 
opinion  is  formed  based  on  the  best  available  information  at  balance  date.  No  adjustment  is  made  for  the  likelihood  of  market 
performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. 
No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition. 
Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised 
for  the  award  is  recognised  immediately.  However,  if  a  new  award  is  substituted  for  the  cancelled  award,  and  designated  as  a 
replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original 
award. 

(p) Issued capital 
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. 
Incremental  costs  directly  attributable to  the  issue  of  new  shares or  options  are shown  in  equity  as  a  deduction,  net  of  tax,  from  the 
proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options for the acquisition of a business are not included in 
the cost of the acquisition as part of the purchase consideration. 

29 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
(q) Earnings per share 
(i) Basic earnings per share 
Basic  earnings  per  share  is  calculated by  dividing  the  profit  attributable  to  owners  of  the  Company,  excluding  any  costs  of  servicing 
equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for 
bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the year. 

(ii) Diluted earnings per share 
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income 
tax  effect  of  interest  and  other  financing  costs associated  with dilutive potential  ordinary  shares  and  the  weighted average  number of 
shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares. 

(r) Goods and Services Tax (GST) 
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not recoverable from the 
taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense. 
Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or 
payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the statement of financial position. 
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities which are 
recoverable from, or payable to the taxation authority, are presented as operating cash flows. 

(s) New accounting standards and interpretations 
Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for 30 June 2010 reporting periods. The 
Group’s assessment of the impact of these new standards and interpretations is set out below. 

AASB  2009-8  Amendments  to  Australian  Accounting  Standards  –  Group  Cash-Settled  Share-based  Payment  Transactions  [AASB  2] 
(effective from 1 January 2010) 
The amendments made by the AASB to  AASB 2  confirm that an entity receiving  goods  or services in a Group share-based payment 
arrangement  must  recognise  or  expense  for  those  goods  or  services  regardless  of  which  entity  in  the  Group  settles the transaction or 
whether  the  transaction  is  settled  in  shares  or  cash.  They  also  clarify  how  the  Group  share-based  payment  arrangement  should  be 
measured,  that  is,  whether  it  is  measured  as  an  equity  or  a  cash-settled  transaction.  The  Group  will  apply  these  amendments 
retrospectively  for  the  financial  reporting  period  commencing  on  1  July  2010.  There  will  be  no  impact  on  the  Group’s  financial 
statements. 

AASB 2009-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Classification of Rights Issues [AASB 132] (effective from 1 February 
2010) 
In October 2009 the AASB issued an amendment to AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Presentation which addresses the accounting for 
addresses for rights issues that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuer. Provided certain conditions 
are met, such rights issues are now classified as equity regardless of the currency in which the exercise price is denominated. Previously, 
these issues had to be accounted for as derivative liabilities. The amendment must be applied retrospectively in accordance with AASB 
108 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors. The Group will apply the amended standard from 1 July 2010. 
As the Group has not made any such rights issues, the amendment will not have any effect on the Group’s financial statements. 

AASB 9 Financial Instruments and AASB 2009-11 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 (effective from 
1 January 2013) 
AASB  9  Financial  Instruments  addresses  the  classification  and  measurement  of  financial  assets  and  is  likely  to  affect  the  Group’s 
accounting for its financial assets. The standard is not applicable until1 January 2013 but is available for early adoption. The group is yet 
to assess its full impact. The Group has not yet decided when to adopt AASB 9. 

Revised  AASB  124  Related  Party  Disclosures  and  AASB  2009-12  Amendments  to  Australian  Accounting  Standards  (effective  from  1 
January 2011) 
In December 2009 the AASB issued a revised AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures. It is effective for accounting periods beginning on 
or after 1 January 2011 and must be applied retrospectively. The amendment removes the requirement for government-related entities to 
disclose details of all transactions with the government and other government-related entities and clarifies and simplifies the definition of 
a related party. The Group will apply the amended standard from 1 July 2011. The amendments are not expected to have a significant 
impact on the financial statements of the Group. 

30 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

1.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) 
AASB  Interpretation  19  Extinguishing  financial  liabilities  with  equity  instruments  and  AASB  2009-13  Amendments  to  Australian 
Accounting Standards arising from Interpretation 19 (effective from 1 July 2010) 
AASB  Interpretation  19  clarifies  the  accounting  when  an  entity  renegotiates  the  terms  of  its  debt  with  the  result  that  the  liability  is 
extinguished  by  the  entity  issuing  its  own  equity  instruments  to  the  creditor  (debt  for  equity  swap).  It  requires  a  gain  or  loss  to  be 
recognised in profit or loss which is measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability and the fair value 
of the equity instruments issued. The Group will apply the interpretation from 1 July 2010, with retrospective application required. The 
Group has not yet determined the potential effect of the interpretation. 

(t) Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions 
The  preparation  of  these  financial  statements  requires the  use  of  certain  critical accounting  estimates.  It  also  requires  management  to 
exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or 
complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are: 

Environmental Issues 
Balances disclosed in the financial statements and notes thereto are not adjusted for any pending or enacted environmental legislation, 
and  the  directors  understanding  thereof.  At  the  current  stage  of  the  Group’s  development  and  its  current  environmental  impact  the 
directors believe such treatment is reasonable and appropriate. 

Taxation 
Balances disclosed in the financial statements and the notes thereto related to taxation are based on the best estimates of the directors. 
These estimates take into account both the financial performance and position of the Group as they pertain to current income taxation 
legislation, and the directors understanding thereof. No adjustment has been made for pending or future taxation legislation. The current 
income tax position represents that directors’ best estimate, pending an assessment by the Australian Taxation Office. 

Exploration expenditure 
Exploration and evaluation costs are expensed as they are incurred. 

Share based payments 
The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the 
date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an internal valuation using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, using 
the assumptions detailed in note 22. If any of these assumptions were to change, there may be an impact on the amounts reported. 

2. 

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT 

The  Group’s  activities  expose it to  a  variety  of  financial  risks:  market risk  (including  currency  risk,  interest  rate risk and price  risk), 
credit  risk  and  liquidity  risk.  The  Group’s  overall risk  management  program  focuses  on  the  unpredictability  of  financial  markets  and 
seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. 
Risk  management  is  carried  out  by  the  full  Board  of  Directors  as  the  Group  believes  that  it  is  crucial  for  all  board  members  to  be 
involved in this process. The Managing Director, with the assistance of senior management as required, has responsibility for identifying, 
assessing, treating and monitoring risks and reporting to the board on risk management.  

(a) Market risk 
(i) Foreign exchange risk 
The  Group  operates  internationally  and  is  exposed  to  foreign  exchange  risk  arising  from  various  currency  exposures,  primarily  with 
respect to the Chilean Peso (“CLP”). 
Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities denominated in a currency that is 
not  the  entity’s  functional  currency  and  net  investments  in  foreign  operations.  The  Group  has  not  formalised  a  foreign  currency  risk 
management policy however, it monitors its foreign currency expenditure in light of exchange rate movements. 
The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date was as follows: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Trade and other payables 

2010 
CLP 

2,534,184 
4,262,057 
(3,868,653) 

2009 
CLP 

1,685,576 
1,950,367 
(2,121,372) 

Sensitivity analysis 
Based on the financial instruments held at 30 June 2010, had the Australian dollar weakened/strengthened by 10% against the Chilean 
Peso with all other variables held constant, there would have been nil impact on the Group’s post-tax losses for the year (2009: Nil) and 
immaterial movements to the Group’s equity for both years presented. 

31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (cont’d) 

2. 
(ii) Price risk 
Given the current level of operations, the Group is not exposed to price risk. 

(iii) Interest rate risk 
The Group is exposed to movements in market interest rates on cash and cash equivalents. The Group policy is to monitor the interest 
rate yield curve out to six months to ensure a balance is maintained between the liquidity of cash assets and the interest rate return. The 
entire balance of cash and cash equivalents for the Group $219,252 (2009: $286,034) is subject to interest rate risk. The proportional mix 
of  floating  interest  rates  and  fixed rates  to  a  maximum  of  six  months  fluctuate  during  the  year  depending  on  current  working  capital 
requirements. The weighted average interest rate received on cash and cash equivalents by the Group was 3.3% (2009: 4.3%). 

Sensitivity analysis 
At 30 June 2010, if interest rates had changed by -/+ 80 basis points from the weighted average rate for the year with all other variables 
held constant, post-tax loss for the Group would have been $2,500 lower/higher (2009: $6,000 lower/higher) as a result of lower/higher 
interest income from cash and cash equivalents. 

(b) Credit risk 
The  Group  does  not  have  any  significant  concentrations  of  credit  risk.  The  maximum  exposure  to  credit  risk  at  balance  date  is  the 
carrying  amount  (net  of  provision  for  impairment)  of  those  assets  as  disclosed  in  the  statement  of  financial position  and  notes  to  the 
financial statements. 
As  the  Group  does  not  presently  have  any  debtors,  lending,  significant  stock  levels  or  any  other  credit  risk,  a  formal  credit  risk 
management policy is not maintained. 
Credit risk related to balances with banks by ensuring surplus funds are only invested with counterparties with a Standard & Poor’s rating 
of atleast AA-. 

(c) Liquidity risk 
The Group manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and ensuring sufficient cash and marketable 
securities  are  available  to  meet  the  current  and  future  commitments  of  the  Group.  Due  to  the  nature  of  the  Group’s  activities,  being 
mineral exploration, the Group does not have ready access to credit facilities, with the primary source of funding being equity raisings. 
The  Board  of  Directors  constantly  monitor  the  state  of  equity  markets  in  conjunction  with  the  Group’s  current  and  future  funding 
requirements, with a view to initiating appropriate capital raisings as required. 
The financial liabilities of the Group are confined to trade and other payables as disclosed in the Statement of financial position. All trade 
and other payables are non-interest bearing and due within 12 months of the reporting date. 

(d) Fair value estimation 
The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes. 
All financial assets and financial liabilities of the Group at the balance date are recorded at amounts approximating their carrying amount. 
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market 
price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price. 
The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values due to their 
short-term nature. 

3.  OPERATING SEGMENTS 

Identification of reportable segments 
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (chief 
operating decision makers) in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources. 
Reportable segments disclosed are based on aggregating operating segments where the segments are considered to have similar economic 
characteristics. For management purposes, the Group has identified only one reportable segment as exploration activities undertaken in 
Chile.  This  segment  includes  activities  associated  with  the  determination  and  assessment  of  the  existence  of  commercial  economic 
reserves, from the Group’s mineral assets in this geographic location. 

Basis of accounting for purposes of reporting by operating segments 
Accounting policies adopted 
Unless stated otherwise, all amounts reported to the Board of Directors as the chief decision maker with respect to operating segments 
are  determined  in  accordance  with  accounting  policies  that  are  consistent  to  those  adopted  in  the  annual  financial  statements  of  the 
Group. 

32 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

SEGMENT INFORMATION (cont’d) 

3. 
Inter-segment transactions 
An  internally  determined  transfer  price  is  set  for  all  inter-entity  sales.    This  price  is  re-set  quarterly  and  is  based  on  what  would  be 
realised in the event the sale was made to an external party at arm’s-length. All such transactions are eliminated on consolidation for the 
Group’s financial statements. 
Inter-segment loans payable and receivable are initially recognised at the consideration received net of transaction costs. If inter-segment 
loans receivable and payable are not on commercial terms, these are not adjusted to fair value based on market interest rates. This policy 
represents a departure from that applied to the statutory financial statements. 

Segment assets 
Where an asset is used across multiple segments, the asset is allocated to the segment that receives the majority of economic value from 
the asset. In the majority of instances, segment assets are clearly identifiable on the basis of their nature and physical location. 
Unless indicated otherwise in the segment assets note, investments in financial assets, deferred tax assets and intangible assets have not 
been allocated to operating segments. 

Segment liabilities 
Liabilities are allocated to segments where there is direct nexus between the incurrence of the liability and the operations of the segment. 
Borrowings and tax liabilities are generally considered to relate to the Group as a whole and are not allocated. Segment liabilities include 
trade and other payables and certain direct borrowings. 

Unallocated items 

The following items of revenue, expense, assets and liabilities are not allocated to operating segments as they are not considered part of 
the core operations of the segment: 
• 

Head office and other administration costs. 

Comparative information 
This is the first reporting period in which AASB 8 Operating Segments has been adopted. Comparative information has been restated to 
conform to the requirements of the Standard. 

Chile exploration segment 

Segment revenue 

Reconciliation of segment revenue to total revenue before tax: 
Corporate interest revenue 

Total revenue 

Segment results 

Reconciliation of segment result to net loss before tax: 
Depreciation expense 
Salaries and employee benefits expense 
Share based payments expense 
Other corporate and administration expenses 

Net loss before tax 

Segment operating assets 

Reconciliation of segment operating assets to total assets: 
Other corporate and administration assets 

Total assets 

Segment operating liabilities 

Reconciliation of segment operating liabilities to total liabilities: 
Inter-segment eliminations 
Other corporate and administration liabilities 

Total liabilities 

33 

2010 
$ 

- 

11,106 

11,106 

2009 
$ 

- 

32,497 

32,497 

(177,602) 

(780,636) 

(3,501) 
(333,519) 
(32,925) 
(227,739) 

(775,286) 

(3,272) 
(122,952) 
- 
(527,789) 

(1,434,649) 

15,040 

8,691 

214,536 
229,576 

286,398 
295,089 

1,295,502 

1,196,444 

(1,286,941) 
63,668 
72,229 

(1,191,374) 
62,953 
68,023 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

4. 

REVENUE 

From continuing operations 
Other revenue 
Interest 

5. 

EXPENSES 

Loss before income tax includes the following specific expenses: 

Defined contribution superannuation expense 

Impairment expense - trade and other receivables 

6. 

INCOME TAX 

(a) Income tax expense 
Current tax 
Deferred tax 

2010 

$ 

2009 

$ 

11,106 

32,497 

20,528 

12,045 

20,481 

84,183 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

(b) Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax 

payable 

Loss from continuing operations before income tax expense 

(775,286) 

(1,434,649) 

Prima facie tax benefit at the Australian tax rate of 30% 
Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible (taxable) in calculating 
taxable income: 

Share-based payments 
Sundry items 

Movements in unrecognised temporary differences 
Tax effect of current year tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been 
recognised 
Income tax expense 

(c) Unrecognised temporary differences 
Deferred Tax Assets (at 30%) 
On Income Tax Account 
Capital raising costs 
Provisions for impairment 
Other 
Carry forward tax losses 

(232,586) 

(430,395) 

9,878 
10 
(222,698) 

(22,373) 

245,071 
- 

54,202 
44,134 
13,500 
1,244,569 
1,356,405 

- 
174 
(430,221) 

13,063 

417,158 
- 

61,782 
43,720 
13,500 
999,498 
1,118,500 

Deferred Tax Liabilities (at 30%) 

- 

- 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 

7. 
Cash at bank and in hand 
Cash and cash equivalents 

219,252 
219,252 

286,034 
286,034 

Cash at bank and in hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. 

34 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES 

8. 
Government taxes receivable 
Provision for impairment (note (a)) 
Other receivables 

2010 

$ 

147,113 
(147,113) 
9,432 
9,432 

2009 

$ 

145,734 
(145,734) 
4,662 
4,662 

(a) Impaired receivables 
As at 30 June 2010 the GTS receivable from the Group’s operations in Chile (tax similar to Australia’s GST), with a nominal value of 
$147,113 (2009: $145,734), has been provided for in full. The GTS may only be recoverable once the Group’s operations are producing 
revenue in Chile. 
Movements in the provision for impairment of receivables are as follows: 
Balance at the beginning of the year 
Exchange differences 
Provision for impairment recognised during the year 

145,734 
(10,666) 
12,045 
147,113 

51,372 
10,179 
84,183 
145,734 

9. 

PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 

Plant and equipment 
Cost 
Accumulated depreciation 
Net book amount 

Plant and equipment 
Opening net book amount 
Depreciation charge 
Closing net book amount 

10.  TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES 
Trade payables 
Other payables and accruals 

11. 

ISSUED CAPITAL 

(a) Share capital 

Ordinary shares fully paid 

Total issued capital 

9,389 
(8,497) 
892 

4,393 
(3,501) 
892 

22,484 
49,745 
72,229 

9,389 
(4,996) 
4,393 

7,665 
(3,272) 
4,393 

31,377 
36,646 
68,023 

2010 

2009 

Notes 
  11(b), 11(d) 

Number of 
shares 

$ 

34,917,510 

4,268,799 

Number of 
shares 
26,450,010 

$ 

3,602,414 

34,917,510 

4,268,799 

26,450,010 

3,602,414 

35 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

11. 

ISSUED CAPITAL (cont’d) 

(b) Movements in ordinary share capital 

Beginning of the financial year 
Issued during the year: 
−  Issued for cash at 8 cents per share 
−  Issued for cash at 9 cents per share 
−  Issued for cash at 20 cents per share 
Less: Transaction costs 
End of the financial year 

(c) Movements in options on issue 

Beginning of the financial year 
Issued during the year: 
−  Exercisable at 10 cents, on or before 30 Jun 2011 
−  Exercisable at 15 cents, on or before 23 Aug 2013 
−  Exercisable at 20 cents, on or before 23 Aug 2013 
End of the financial year 

2010 

2009 

Number of 
shares 

$ 

Number of 
shares 

$ 

26,450,010 

3,602,414 

23,000,010 

2,954,849 

4,500,000 
3,967,500 
- 
- 
34,917,510 

360,000 
357,075 
- 
(50,690) 
4,268,799 

- 
- 
3,450,000 
- 
26,450,010 

- 
- 
690,000 
(42,435) 
3,602,414 

Number of options 
2009 
2010 

9,750,000 

9,750,000 

4,500,000 
75,000 
75,000 
14,400,000 

- 
- 
- 
9,750,000 

(d) Ordinary shares 
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number 
of and amounts paid on the shares held. 
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll 
each share is entitled to one vote. 
Ordinary shares have no par value and the Company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital. 

(e) Capital risk management 
The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard their ability to continue as a going concern, so that they may continue to 
provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. 
Due to the nature of the Group’s activities, being mineral exploration, the Group does not have ready access to credit facilities, with the 
primary  source  of  funding  being  equity  raisings.  Therefore, the  focus  of  the  Group’s  capital risk  management  is  the  current  working 
capital position against the requirements of the Group to meet exploration programmes and corporate overheads. The Group’s strategy is 
to  ensure  appropriate  liquidity  is  maintained  to  meet  anticipated operating  requirements,  with  a  view  to  initiating  appropriate  capital 
raisings as required. The working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2010 and 30 June 2009 is as follows: 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Trade and other payables 
Working capital position 

2010 
$ 

219,252 
9,432 
(72,229) 
156,455 

2009 
$ 

286,034 
4,662 
(68,023) 
222,673 

36 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

12.  RESERVES AND ACCUMULATED LOSSES 

(a) Reserves 
Foreign currency translation reserve 
Share-based payments reserve 

Movements: 

Foreign currency translation reserve 
Balance at beginning of year 
Currency translation differences arising during the year 
Balance at end of year 

Share-based payments reserve 
Balance at beginning of year 
Options issued to employees and contractors 
Balance at end of year 

2010 

$ 

30,781 
96,475 
127,256 

24,524 
6,257 
30,781 

63,550 
32,925 
96,475 

2009 

$ 

24,524 
63,550 
88,074 

629 
23,895 
24,524 

63,550 
- 
63,550 

(b) Nature and purpose of reserves 
(i) Foreign currency translation reserve 
Exchange  differences  arising  on  translation  of  the  foreign  controlled  entities  are  taken to  the  foreign  currency  translation  reserve, as 
described in note 1(d). The reserve is recognised in profit and loss when the net investment is disposed of. 

(ii) Share-based payments reserve 
The share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options issued. 

13.  KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES 

(a) Key management personnel compensation 
Short-term benefits 
Post employment benefits 
Other long-term benefits 
Termination benefits 
Share-based payments 

244,500 
18,700 
- 
- 
- 
263,200 

244,500 
17,350 
- 
- 
- 
261,850 

Detailed remuneration disclosures are provided in the remuneration report on pages 12 and 13. 

37 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

13.  KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES (cont’d) 

(b) Equity instrument disclosures relating to key management personnel  
(i) Options provided as remuneration and shares issued on exercise of such options 
Details of options provided as remuneration and shares issued on the exercise of such options, together with terms and conditions of the 
options, can be found in the remuneration report on page 13. 

(ii) Option holdings  
The numbers of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each director of Genesis Minerals Limited 
and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below: 

2010 

Balance at 
start of the 
year 

Granted as 

compensation  Exercised 

Other 
changes 

Balance at 
end of the 
year 

Vested and 
exercisable 

Unvested 

Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited 
Michael Haynes 
1,000,000 
Michael Fowler 
5,000,000 
Graeme Smith 
500,000 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

1,000,000 
5,000,000 
500,000 

1,000,000 
5,000,000 
500,000 

- 
- 
- 

2009 

Balance at 
start of the 
year 

Granted as 

compensation  Exercised 

Other 
changes 

Balance at 
end of the 
year 

Vested and 
exercisable 

Unvested 

Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited 
1,000,000 
Michael Haynes 
5,000,000 
Michael Fowler 
500,000 
Graeme Smith 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

1,000,000 
5,000,000 
500,000 

1,000,000 
5,000,000 
500,000 

- 
- 
- 

All vested options are exercisable at the end of the year. 

(iii)  Share holdings 
The  numbers  of  shares  in  the  Company  held  during  the  financial  year  by  each  director  of  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  and  other  key 
management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below. There were no shares granted during 
the reporting period as compensation. 

2010 

Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited 
Ordinary shares 
Michael Haynes 
Michael Fowler 
Graeme Smith 

2009 

Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited 
Ordinary shares 
Michael Haynes 
Michael Fowler 
Graeme Smith 

(c) Loans to key management personnel 
There were no loans to key management personnel during the year. 

38 

Received 
during the 
year on the 
exercise of 
options 

Balance at 
start of the 
year 

Other 
changes 
during the 
year 

Balance at 
end of the 
year 

660,000 
2,000,000 
60,000 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

660,000 
2,000,000 
60,000 

Received 
during the 
year on the 
exercise of 
options 

Balance at 
start of the 
year 

Other 
changes 
during the 
year 

Balance at 
end of the 
year 

660,000 
2,000,000 
60,000 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

660,000 
2,000,000 
60,000 

 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

2010 

$ 

2009 

$ 

14.  REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS 
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and 
non-related audit firms: 
Audit services 
Bentleys - audit of financial reports 
Eduardo Barrientos - audit or review of financial reports of any entity in the 
Group 
Total remuneration for audit services 

3,607 
29,607 

- 
21,450 

26,000 

21,450 

15.  CONTINGENCIES 

There are no contingent liabilities or contingent assets of the Group at balance date. 

16.  COMMITMENTS 

(a) Exploration commitments 
The Group has certain commitments to meet minimum expenditure requirements on the mineral exploration assets it has an interest in. 
Outstanding exploration commitments are as follows: 

within one year 
later than one year but not later than five years 

41,000 
123,000 
164,000 

26,000 
78,000 
104,000 

(b) Remuneration commitments 
Amounts disclosed as remuneration commitments include commitments arising from the service contracts of key management personnel 
referred  to  in  the  remuneration  report  on  page  13  that  are  not  recognised  as  liabilities  and  are  not  included  in  the  key  management 
personnel compensation. 

within one year 
later than one year but not later than five years 

44,000 
- 
44,000 

44,000 
- 
44,000 

17.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 

(a) Parent entity 
The ultimate parent entity within the Group is Genesis Minerals Limited. 

(b) Subsidiaries 
Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 18. 

(c) Key management personnel  
Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 13. 

(d) Loans to related parties 
Genesis Minerals Limited has provided an unsecured, interest free loan to its wholly owned subsidiary, Genesis Minerals (Chile) S.A., 
totalling $1,286,941 (2009: $1,191,374) at 30 June 2010. An impairment assessment is undertaken each financial year by examining the 
financial position of the subsidiary and the market in which the subsidiary operates to determine whether there is objective evidence that 
the subsidiary is impaired. When such objective evidence exists, the Company recognises an allowance for the impairment loss. 

39 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

18.  SUBSIDIARIES 

The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiaries in  accordance with the 
accounting policy described in note 1(b): 
Name 

Country of Incorporation 

Equity Holding(1) 

Class of Shares 

Genesis Minerals (Chile) S.A. 

Chile 

Ordinary 

(1)  The proportion of ownership interest is equal to the proportion of voting power held. 

2010 
% 

100 

2009 
% 

100 

19.  EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE 

Project Acquisitions 
On 5 August 2010 Genesis announced it had entered into an agreement with a private Chilean company to acquire a 100% interest in the 
Dinamarquesa Gold – Copper Project in northern Chile. An initial payment of US$125,000 is due within 21 working days of Genesis 
completing due diligence and the signing of a formal Option Agreement. Staged payments totalling US$4,300,000 are then due over a 48 
month period with a 2nd payment of US$125,000 due 9 months after signing the Option Agreement. 
On 12 August 2010 Genesis announced it had entered into an agreement with a private Chilean company to acquire a 100% interest in 
the  Cerro  Blanco  Gold-Copper-Silver  Project  in  northern  Chile.  An  initial  payment  of  US$30,000  is  due  within  28  working  days  of 
Genesis completing due diligence and executing a formal Option Agreement, which is scheduled to be finalised by mid September 2010.  
Staged payments totalling US$4,000,000 are then due over a 60 month period with a 2nd payment of US$75,000 due 12 months after 
signing  the  Option  Agreement.   In  addition  Genesis  will  issue the  private  Chilean  company  US$20,000  worth  of  fully  paid  ordinary 
shares  in  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  on  satisfactory  completion  of  Due  Diligence.   On  each  12  month  anniversary  of  the  Agreement 
Genesis will issue the vendor an additional US$25,000 worth of fully paid ordinary shares in Genesis.  

Capital Raisings 
On 27 August 2010, Genesis announced a pro rata non-renounceable Entitlements Issue on the basis of 2 new shares for every 3 held on 
the record date at an issue price of $0.05 each. The Entitlement Issue is underwritten and will raise approximately $1,163,917 (before 
costs). 
On 10 September 2010, Genesis announced the issue of 4,937,627 fully paid ordinary shares in a placement at an issue price of $0.05 per 
share to raise $246,881 (before costs). 

No other matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect 
the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years. 

20.  CASH FLOW INFORMATION 

Reconciliation of net loss after income tax to net cash outflow from 
operating activities 
Net loss for the year 
Non-Cash Items 
Depreciation of non-current assets 
Share based payments expense 
Net exchange differences 
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase of 
controlled entities 
Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables 
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables 
Net cash outflow from operating activities 

2010 
$ 

2009 
$ 

(775,286) 

(1,434,649) 

3,501 
32,925 
6,526 

(5,115) 
4,581 
(732,868) 

3,272 
- 
14,797 

6,169 
(114,440) 
(1,524,851) 

40 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

21.  LOSS PER SHARE 

(a) Reconciliation of earnings used in calculating loss per share 
Loss attributable to the owners of the Company used in calculating basic and 
diluted loss per share 

(b) Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in 
calculating basic and diluted loss per share 

22.    SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS 

2010 

$ 

2009 

$ 

(775,286) 

(1,434,649) 

Number of shares 

Number of shares 

31,556,421 

25,703,298 

Employees and contractors options 
The  Group  provides  benefits  to  employees  (including  directors)  and  contractors  of  the  Group  in  the  form  of  share-based  payment 
transactions,  whereby  options  to  acquire  ordinary  shares  are  issued  as  an  incentive  to  improve  employee  and  shareholder  goal 
congruence. The exercise price of the options granted ranges from 15 to 20 cents with expiry dates ranging from 28 February 2013 to 23 
August 2013. 
Included in the above are 150,000 options granted to an employee that vested in two equal tranches of 75,000 options each, with the first 
tranche vesting on 20 August 2008 and the second tranche vesting on 20 August 2009. The expense should have been recognised over 
the respective periods but was not. The effect is not considered material, hence the entire expense was recognised in this financial year. 
Options granted carry no dividend or voting rights. When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary share of the Company 
with full dividend and voting rights. 
Set out below are summaries of the options granted: 

Outstanding at the beginning of the year 
Granted  
Forfeited/cancelled 
Exercised  
Expired  
Outstanding at year-end  
Exercisable at year-end  

2010 

2009 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
cents 

20.0 
17.5 
- 
- 
- 
19.4 
19.4 

Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
cents 

20.0 
- 
- 
- 
- 
20.0 
20.0 

Number of 
options 

500,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 
500,000 
500,000 

Number of 
options 

500,000 
150,000 
- 
- 
- 
650,000 
650,000 

The weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end of the financial year was 2.78 years (2009: 2.58), 
with exercise prices ranging from 15 to 20 cents. 

Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions 
The weighted average fair value of the options granted during the year was 21.7 cents (2009: N/A). The price was calculated by using the 
Black-Scholes European Option Pricing Model applying the following inputs: 

2010 

2009 

Weighted average exercise price (cents) 
Weighted average life of the option (years) 
Weighted average underlying share price (cents) 
Expected share price volatility 
Risk free interest rate 
Historical volatility has been used as the basis for determining expected share price volatility as it assumed that this is indicative of future 
trends, which may not eventuate.  
The life of the options is based on historical exercise patterns, which may not eventuate in the future. 

20.0 
6.0 
25.0 
109.5% 
6.5% 

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

41 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 

30 JUNE 2010 

2010 

$ 

2009 

$ 

22.    SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (cont’d) 

Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the year were as follows: 

Options issued to employees and contractors 

32,925 

- 

23.  PARENT ENTITY INFORMATION 
The following information relates to the parent entity, Genesis Minerals Limited, at 30 June 2010. The information presented here has 
been prepared using accounting policies consistent with those presented in Note 1. 

Current assets 
Non-current assets 

Total assets 

Current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Issued capital 
Share-based payments reserve 
Accumulated losses 

Total equity 

Loss for the year 

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

213,644 
892 

214,536 

63,668 

63,668 

4,268,799 
96,475 
(4,214,406) 

150,868 

(771,887) 

(771,887) 

282,005 
4,393 

286,398 

62,953 

62,953 

3,602,414 
63,550 
(3,442,519) 

223,445 

(1,363,072) 

(1,363,072) 

42 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

Directors' Declaration 

In the directors’ opinion: 
(a) 

the financial statements and notes set out on pages 20 to 42 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: 
(i) 

complying  with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting 
requirements; and 
giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2010 and of it’s performance for the financial 
year ended on that date; 

(ii) 

(b) 

(c) 

subject to the matter at note 1(a), there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Group will be able to pay its debts as and when 
they become due and payable; and 
a statement that the attached financial statements are in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards has been 
included in the notes to the financial statements. 

The directors have been given the declarations by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer required by section 295A of the 
Corporations Act 2001. 

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors. 

Michael Fowler 
Managing Director 

Perth, 30 September 2010 

43 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Independent Auditor's Report 

To the Members of Genesis Minerals Limited 

We have audited the accompanying  financial report of Genesis Minerals Limited (“the Company”) and 

Controlled Entities (“the Consolidated Entity”), which comprises the statement of financial position as at 

30  June  2010,  and  the  statement  of  comprehensive  income,  statement  of  changes  in  equity  and 

statement  of  cash  flows  for  the  year  ended  on  that  date,  a  statement  of  accounting  policies,  other 

selected  explanatory  notes  and  the  directors’  declaration  of  the  Consolidated  Entity,  comprising  the 

Company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year. 

Directors Responsibility for the Financial Report  

The  directors  of  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  are  responsible for  the  preparation and  fair  presentation  of 

the  financial  report  in  accordance  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards  (including  the  Australian 

Accounting Interpretations) and the Corporations Act 2001. This responsibility includes establishing and 

maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report that is 

free  from  material  misstatement,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error;  selecting  and  applying  appropriate 

accounting  policies;  and  making  accounting  estimates  that  are  reasonable  in  the  circumstances.  In 

Note 1, the directors  also  state,  in  accordance  with  Accounting  Standards  AASB  101:  Presentation  of 

Financial  Statements,  that  compliance  with  the  Australian  equivalents  to  International  Financial 

Reporting Standards (IFRS) ensures that the financial report, comprising the financial statements and 

notes, complies with IFRS. 

Auditor’s Responsibility 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit.  We conducted our 

audit  in  accordance  with  Australian  Auditing  Standards.    These  Auditing  Standards  require  that  we 

comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit 

to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement. 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in 

the  financial  report.  The  procedures  selected  depend  on  the  auditor’s  judgment,  including  the 

assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.  

In  making  those  risk  assessments,  the  auditor  considers  internal  control  relevant  to  the  entity’s 

preparation  and  fair  presentation  of  the  financial  report  in  order  to  design  audit  procedures  that  are 

appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness 

of  the  entity’s  internal  control.    An  audit  also  includes  evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting 

policies  used  and  the  reasonableness  of  accounting  estimates  made  by  the  directors,  as  well  as 

evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for 

our audit opinion. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
Independent Auditor’s Report 
To the Members of Genesis Minerals Limited (Continued) 

Independence 

In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements 

and the Corporations Act 2001. 

Auditor's Opinion 

In our opinion: 

a.  The financial report of  Genesis Minerals Limited and Controlled Entities is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, 

including: 

i. 

ii. 

giving a true and fair view of the Company and the Consolidated Entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2010 and of its 
performance for the year ended on that date; and 

complying  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards  (including  the  Australian  Accounting  Interpretations)  and  the 
Corporations Regulations 2001;  

b.  The financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1. 

Emphasis of Matter 

Without  qualifying  our  opinion,  attention  is  drawn  to  the  following  matter.   As  a  result  of  matters  described  in  Note  1:  Going 

Concern  to  the  financial  report,  uncertainty  exists  whether  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  and  Controlled  Entities  will  be  able  to 

continue  as  a  going  concern  and  therefore  whether  it  will  be  able  to  pay  its  debts  as  and  when  they  fall  due  and  realise  its 

assets  and  extinguish  its  liabilities  in  the  normal  course  of  business  and  at  the  amounts  stated  in  the  financial  report.   The 

financial report does not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or to 

the  amounts  and  classification  of  liabilities  that  might  be  necessary  should  the  Consolidated  Entity  not  continue  as  a  going 

concern. 

Report on the Remuneration Report 

We  have  audited  the  Remuneration  Report  included  within  the  report  of  the  directors  for  the  year  ended  30  June  2010.  The 

directors  of  Genesis  Minerals  Limited  are  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  presentation  of  the  Remuneration  Report  in 

accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration 

Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. 

Auditor’s Opinion 

In our opinion the Remuneration Report of  Genesis Minerals Limited for the year ended 30 June 2010, complies with section 

300A of the Corporations Act 2001. 

BENTLEYS 
Chartered Accountants 

CHRIS WATTS CA 
Director 

DATED at PERTH this 30th day of September 2010 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

ASX Additional Information  

Additional information required by Australian Stock Exchange Ltd and not shown elsewhere in this report is as follows.  The information 
is current as at 29 September 2010.  

(a)  Distribution of equity securities 
Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding: 

1 
1,001 
5,001 
10,001 
100,001 

- 
- 
- 
- 

1,000 
5,000 
10,000 
100,000 
and over 

The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of shares are: 

(b)  Twenty largest shareholders 
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted ordinary shares are: 

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 

Argonaut Equity Partners Pty Limited 
Lachlan Resource Investments Ltd 
Mr Michael John Fowler & Mrs Fiona Lee Dixon Fowler  
Merrill Lynch (Australia) Nominees Pty Ltd  
Dgali Investments Pty Ltd 
Mr Henry Wiechecki 
Gecko Resources Pty Ltd 
Mr Geoffrey Norman Barnesby-Johnson & Catherine Jane Halvorsen 
Argonaut Investments  
Scintilla Strategic Investments Limited 
Mr Mark Paterniti & Mrs Karen Paterniti  
Mr Darren Peter Gordon  
Halson Corporation Pty Ltd  
Stateline Investments Pty Ltd  
Geotech International Pty Ltd  
Mr Bradley George Bolin 
Mr Michael Filan Ashforth 
Bullseye Geoservices Pty Ltd 
Mr Denis John Reynolds 
Celtic Capital Pty Ltd 

Ordinary shares 
Number of holders  Number of shares 

1 
15 
82 
211 
70 

379 

20 

10 
55,536 
782,977 
7,903,474 
31,113,140 

39,855,137 

78,268 

Listed ordinary shares 

Number of shares 

Percentage of 
ordinary shares 

2,825,000 
2,487,627 
2,000,000 
1,877,000 
1,700,000 
1,150,000 
865,000 
845,000 
750,000 
725,000 
667,862 
625,000 
600,000 
600,000 
583,334 
580,780 
540,000 
500,000 
500,000 
409,175 
20,830,778 

7.09 
6.24 
5.02 
4.71 
4.27 
2.89 
2.17 
2.12 
1.88 
1.82 
1.68 
1.57 
1.51 
1.51 
1.51 
1.46 
1.46 
1.35 
1.25 
1.17 
52.68 

46 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities 

ASX Additional Information continued 

(c)  Substantial shareholders 
The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B of the Corporations Act 2001 
are: 

Argonaut Equity Partners Pty Limited 
Lachlan Resource Investments Ltd 
Mr Michael John Fowler & Mrs Fiona Lee Dixon Fowler  

(d)  Voting rights 
All ordinary shares (whether fully paid or not) carry one vote per share without restriction. 

Number of Shares 

2,825,000 
2,487,627 
2,000,000 

(e)  Schedule of interests in mining tenements 
Location 
Mundong Well, Western Australia 
Mundong Well, Western Australia 

Tenement 
E08/1690 
E08/1787 

Percentage held / earning 
100% 
100% 

47