Genesis Minerals Limited
Annual Report 2012

Plain-text annual report

Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities ABN 72 124 772 041 Annual Financial Report and Directors’ Report for the year ended 30 June 2012 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Corporate Directory ABN 72 124 772 041 Directors Michael Haynes (Non-Executive Chairman) Michael Fowler (Managing Director) Damian Delaney (Non-Executive Director) Company Secretary Damian Delaney Registered Office and Principal Place of Business Unit 6, 1 Clive Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Telephone: +61 8 9322 6178 Postal Address PO Box 437 WEST PERTH WA 6872 Share Register Computershare Investor Services Pty Ltd Level 2, Reserve Bank Building 45 St George’s Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Auditors Bentleys Level 1, 12 Kings Park Road WEST PERTH WA 6005 Internet Address www.genesisminerals.com.au Email Address info@genesisminerals.com.au Securities Exchange Listing Genesis Minerals Limited shares are listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX code: GMD). 1 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Contents Chairman’s Report Review of Operations Directors' Report Auditor’s Independence Declaration Corporate Governance Statement Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Directors' Declaration Independent Auditor’s Report to Members ASX Additional Information 3 4 13 19 20 25 26 27 28 29 50 51 53 2 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Chairman’s Report Dear Fellow Shareholder I am pleased to present the Annual Report of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2012. During May 2012 Genesis Minerals Limited commenced exploration in San Juan, Argentina with its first ever drilling program completed at the Poncha Gold Project. Significant gold mineralisation was intersected in the program and further drilling will be completed as soon as practicable. It is an exciting time for the Company with inaugural drilling to also be completed at the Las Opeñas Project (25km away from Poncha) to test high-grade gold targets. This program is scheduled to commence in the September 2012 quarter. Both Projects have the potential to deliver significant gold deposits for the Company. Genesis has continued to advance the Dinamarquesa Gold-Copper Project and the Cerro Verde Gold-Copper-Silver Project, both of which are located in the Atacama Desert near the regional City of Copiapó in northern Chile. At Dinamarquesa Genesis completed a 2,800m diamond drilling program during August and September 2011 with encouraging porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum mineralisation returned from the drilling. High-grade gold results were also returned from narrow quartz veins. At Cerro Verde a mapping and sampling program in September and October 2011, undertaken over a 4km by 2km area at Cerro Verde, outlined over 11.2km of prospective veins and structures. A number of high grade copper, gold and silver results were returned. The Company continues to operate with an excellent team of employees and highly competent contractors. We are operating in geological terrains that we consider to be highly prospective for gold and copper. As such we are in a great position to capitalise on the strong global copper and gold prices. With four highly prospective projects and a dedicated, highly competent management team, the Company is well positioned to leverage from exploration success. We will continue to simultaneously pursue the acquisition of other highly prospective, advanced copper and gold projects in Chile and elsewhere in Latin America. During the year Genesis implemented a strategic investment alliance with Investmet Limited, which has provided us with funds to underpin our ongoing exploration efforts in Chile and Argentina. Investmet has a proven track record of providing funding and technical support for junior resources companies and we look forward to working closely with the Investmet team during 2013 and beyond. On behalf of the Board I would like to thank you for your continued support and I look forward to keeping you informed of our progress during the forthcoming year. Mike Haynes Chairman 3  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) During the year Genesis Minerals Limited (“Genesis”) continued exploration on its Dinamarquesa and Cerro Verde Copper-Gold Projects in northern Chile and commenced exploration at the Poncha and Las Opeñas Gold Projects in San Juan, Argentina. At Dinamarquesa Genesis completed a 2,800m diamond drilling program during August and September 2011 with encouraging porphyry copper-gold-molybdenum mineralisation returned from the drilling. High-grade gold results were also returned from narrow quartz veins. A mapping and sampling program during September and October 2011, undertaken over a 4km by 2km area at Cerro Verde, outlined over 11.2km of prospective veins and structures. A number of high grade copper, gold and silver results were returned. Genesis commenced its first drilling program at Poncha during May 2012, with significant gold mineralisation intersected. The inaugural drilling at the Las Opeñas Project (25km away from Poncha) to test high-grade gold targets is due to commence in the September 2012 quarter. Figure 2. Argentinean Projects Figure 1. Project locations Poncha and Las Opeñas Projects, San Juan, Argentina Genesis Minerals Limited has agreements with Teck Argentina Ltd. (“Teck”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited, to acquire 100% of Teck’s right and interest in the Poncha and Las Opeñas epithermal gold projects in San Juan Province, Argentina The Poncha and Las Opeñas Projects are located 200km northwest of the regional capital San Juan and about 40km northwest of the town of Rodeo in the foothills of the Andes, at elevations of between 2,800m and 4,500m above sea level. Infrastructure in the area is good. Access to the Projects is gained via good paved and gravel roads from Rodeo. The Projects are approximately 25km apart. Poncha A drilling program was commenced at the Poncha Project in the June quarter of 2012 and despite inclement weather restricting the 4,000 metre program to just 7 holes for 1,498 metres, very encouraging results were received. During May 2012 (see Genesis ASX release dated July 30,2012) these results returned high-grade gold mineralisation in drill-hole 12 PODH 003, with analytical results including:   12.15m @ 4.87 g/t gold, 15.9 g/t silver and 0.49% zinc; and 5.25m @ 0.62 g/t gold, 12 g/t silver, 0.46% lead and 0.77% zinc Very encouraging early results have been returned from several other holes drilled at the Epithermal South Target of the Poncha Project, including:  12 PODH 002 - 1.95m @ 0.58 g/t gold, 102.2 g/t silver, +1% copper and 0.55% zinc  12 PODH 005 -10.6m @ 0.58 g/t gold  12 PODH 006 - 31.6m @ 0.32 g/t gold The results support Genesis’ belief that Poncha has the potential to host a multi-million-ounce gold deposit in a high-grade epithermal system. 4  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) Hole 12 PODH 003 was drilled perpendicular to a previous drill hole PC13 (see Genesis ASX release dated April 6, 2011; see Figure 4) that intersected:  266m @ 1.21 g/t gold including:  22m @ 3.01 g/t gold, 5.4 g/t silver, 0.3% zinc; and  61m @ 3.04 g/t gold containing   4m @ 10.84 g/t gold and 7.9 g/t silver, and 8m @ 10.91 g/t gold and 24 g/t silver. Recent results indicate that the previous drill hole was probably oriented down-dip of, rather than perpendicular to, the mineralisation. As such the geological controls on the location of this high-grade mineralisation are now much better understood and further drilling can be optimally directed to evaluate the extensions of this mineralisation, which remains open in all directions. Drilling indicates high-grade mineralisation associated with this zone probably extends to over 300m below surface. There is significant potential to delineate considerable resources within this mineralised zone. 5  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) Figure 3. Cross section 6,693,050N Figure 4. Drill hole location plan Southern Epithermal Target Mineralisation in 12 PODH 003 is associated with steeply dipping structures containing pyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite (Figure 3). Mineralisation at the Epithermal South Target is classified as an intermediate sulphidation epithermal system. These types of deposits (eg. Kelian) typically have these high grade narrow sulphide-only veins within haloes of low grade gold mineralisation. Holes 12 PODH 004 to 007 targeted an interpreted north trending gold and zinc in talus fines geochemical anomaly and structural zone 150m to the east of 12 PODH 003. This wide-spaced drilling returned encouraging low grade gold mineralisation associated with sulphide rich breccias. Hole 12 PODH 006 intersected a sulphide-rich breccia intrusion which warrants further drilling to test for potential high-grade epithermal gold mineralisation associated with breccia intrusions along the interpreted north-south trending structural corridor. Holes 12 PODH 004 to 007 intersected mostly argillic altered dacite, lapilli tuffs and breccias. The polymictic breccias intersected in 12 PODH 006 comprise clasts of porphyry, rhyolite and fine grained sediments up to 0.3m in size. Clasts are angular to sub-rounded and the breccia has a milled matrix. Cavities are filled by clays and sulphides and alteration is mainly argillic, The with variable silicification and carbonate alteration. polymictic breccias are interpreted to be phreatomagmatic breccias. Figure 5. Section 6,693,180N Southern Epithermal Target Further Exploration Genesis will recommence the suspended drilling program at Poncha as soon as weather conditions allow; with the program expected to resume in October 2012. The program will continue to target a number of structural and geochemical anomalies at the Southern Epithermal Target as well as the untested Northern Porphyry Target. A large alteration system (2km by 2km) at the Northern Porphyry and Epithermal target (Figure 6), located about 2km north north-west of the Southern Epithermal Target, remains to be tested. Previous drilling (PC003 and PC005) encountered 206m @ 0.14 g/t gold and 0.14% copper in PC003 and 133.5m @ 0.2 g/t gold in PC005 associated with porphyry hosted mineralisation. Epithermal mineralisation at surface to the north of these drill holes within a large alteration system has not been drill tested. The area between the Southern Epithermal Target and the Northern Porphyry Target is under talus scree, so any mineralisation in this area would be obscured by cover, hence further exploration in this area is also warranted. 6  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) Figure 6 Poncha Target location plan. Las Opeñas An extensive high-grade epithermal system has been identified at Las Opeñas at surface over 4.5 sq kms, with rock chip sampling and mapping returning values of up to 49g/t gold, 183g/t gold and 6,800g/t silver. Channel sampling of mapped breccia bodies has returned results including 20m @ 4.69g/t gold associated with strongly anomalous zinc, lead and silver. This area has never been drill-tested. Las Opeñas is located approximately 25km from Poncha. Drilling is planned to commence in the September 2012 quarter. Figure 7 Gold Results from Rock Chip Samples and Target Zones at the Las Opeñas Project. 7  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) Figure 8 Silver Results from Rock Chip Samples and Target Zones at the Las Opeñas Project. Dinamarquesa and Cerro Verde Projects, Chile Dinamarquesa Genesis entered into an agreement in August 2010 with a private Chilean company to acquire a 100% interest in the Dinamarquesa Project in northern Chile. Limited previous wide spaced drilling had delineated a number of high grade gold structures. The Project is located within the highly mineralised Inca de Oro gold-copper belt which forms part of the well-endowed Palaeocene Porphyry belt of northern Chile. The Project is located in the Atacama Desert in an area with excellent infrastructure about 850 km north of Santiago, 90 km north of the city of Copiapó and 75km east of the Pacific Ocean. The Project is 3km south west of the small town of Inca de Oro which is connected by a sealed highway between Copiapó in the south and Diego de Almagro in the north. The Dinamarquesa Project lies within a cluster of large Paleocene porphyry deposits including the Inca de Oro Deposit, 4km east (388Mt @ 0.38% copper and 0.1g/t gold, Pan Aust ASX Release 19 July 2012) and the Carmen Deposit 5km south (45.8Mt @ 0.34% copper and 0.34g/t gold, Pan Aust ASX Release 14 August 2012), within the Inca de Oro porphyry belt. Figure 9 (Right) Location of the Dinamarquesa Project. Exploration Completed A 2,800m drilling program was completed at the Dinamarquesa Project during August 2011. The purposes of this program were to follow-up high grade intersections returned from previous first pass, wide- spaced drilling and to further test the porphyry copper-gold mineralisation at the Project. Porphyry Copper Mineralisation Highly encouraging results (see Genesis ASX release dated October 11, 2011) were returned from holes drilled to assess the porphyry hosted copper-gold-molybdenum mineralised system, with extensive zones of copper-gold +/- molybdenum mineralisation intersected. 8  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) Results included: DG11-10 13m @ 0.47% copper equivalent (0.30% copper, 0.23 g/t gold) 50m @ 0.40% copper equivalent (0.29 % copper, 0.15g/t gold) DG 11-12 20m @ 0.47% copper equivalent (0.29% copper, 0.19g/t gold) 12m @ 0.39% copper equivalent (0.25% copper, 0.10g/t gold, 106ppm Mo) DG 11-13 46m @ 0.36% copper equivalent (0.22% copper, 0.14g/t gold) 33.3m @ 0.39% copper equivalent (0.25% copper, 0.16g/t gold) DG 11-14 DG 11-15 DG11-17 DG 11-18 140.5m @ 0.40% copper equivalent (0.24% copper, 0.13 g/t gold, 90ppm Mo) 40.1m @ 0.35% copper equivalent (0.17% copper, 0.14g/t gold, 105ppm Mo) 63.3m @ 0.45% copper equivalent (0.27% copper, 0.24g/t gold) 12m @ 0.40% copper equivalent (0.23% copper, 0.14g/t gold) 15m @ 0.67% copper equivalent (0.35% copper, 0.26g/t gold, 169ppm Mo) 12m @ 0.46% copper equivalent (0.24% copper, 0.26g/t gold) 17m @ 0.53% copper equivalent (0.29% copper, 0.15g/t gold) 80m @ 0.48% copper equivalent (0.28 % copper, 0.16g/t gold, 117 ppm Mo) 9m @ 0.55% copper equivalent (0.27 % copper, 0.25g/t gold, 130 ppm Mo) 17m @ 0.77% copper equivalent (0.18% copper, 0.76g/t gold) 15m @ 0.47% copper equivalent (0.30% copper, 0.21g/t gold) 19m @ 0.41% copper equivalent (0.25% copper, 0.11g/t gold, 101 ppm Mo) Figure 10. Intersections of porphyry copper mineralisation in drilling at the Dinamarquesa Project. The recent drilling has confirmed that there is significant potential to define a large porphyry copper – gold – molybdenum system at the Dinamarquesa Project. 9  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) High Grade Gold Mineralisation Further high-grade, vein hosted gold mineralisation was also intersected in the August 2011 drilling program at the Dinamarquesa Project. Results included: DG11-10 DG11-17 DG11-16 1.0m @ 12.5g/t gold 0.2m @ 49.2g/t gold 0.3m @ 21.1g/t gold 0.64m @ 8.2g/t gold 0.2m @ 8.7g/t gold Wider zones of gold mineralisation were also intersected in drilling, including: 10.0m @ 1.7g/t gold 11.7m @ 1.0g/t gold DG11-12 DG11-15 These results are encouraging and further detailed drilling has beenplanned to define the continuity and extent of the vein mineralisation. Figure 11. Intersections of high-grade, vein hosted gold mineralisation in recent drilling at Dinamarquesa. Cerro Verde Genesis entered into an agreement in August 2010 with a private Chilean company to acquire a 100% interest in the Cerro Verde Gold‐ Copper‐Silver Project in northern Chile (Figure 9). Mining in the area dates back to the 1800s but only limited modern exploration has been completed at the Project. Numerous high grade structures remain untested and the potential to discover new veins is considered high; as is the potential to define a large porphyry system at the Project. The Project is located in the Atacama Desert in an area serviced by very good infrastructure about 750 km north of Santiago, 80 km south of the city of Copiapó and 75km east of the Pacific Ocean. The Project is easily accessed by a sealed road and well-formed gravel roads from Copiapó. The altitude ranges from 1,800 to 2,200m, with low to moderate relief. Exploration can be conducted all year round. The Project hosts a sub‐parallel swarm of precious and base metal‐bearing quartz specularite veins exposed along the western flank of a caldera system that is elongated north‐south. The host rocks comprise a sequence of Palaeocene andesitic volcaniclastics, dacite and rhyolite flows, flow‐domes, diatreme‐like breccias, and dikes capped by a blanket of rhyolitic ignimbrites. Ore‐bearing veins cut the 10  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) entire stratigraphic column. Mineralised veins and structures strike north to north east with moderate to steep dips to the east and west. Historic mining in the area dates back to the 1800’s with several high grade veins mined at depth. Only limited historic mining records are currently available to Genesis. However, records indicate that in 1869 some 8,500 tonnes at ~17% copper were extracted from mines in the area. Small scale mining and reclamation of old stockpiles continues at present. Minor surface exploration was completed by Homestake between 1998 and 1999. Between 2004 and 2005, Hochschilds (MH Chile) explored the area by surface mapping, sampling (334 surface samples) and limited diamond drilling (1,219m completed). The surface rock chip sampling by Hochschilds highlighted significant gold, copper and silver surface mineralisation over a 4km by 2km area. Strong arsenic, barium, bismuth, mercury, molybdenum, lead and stibnite anomalism is also present. No other modern exploration is known to have been conducted at the Project. Exploration Completed A mapping and sampling program, undertaken over a 4km by 2km area at Cerro Verde during the second half of 2011, has outlined over 11.2km of prospective veins and structures (Figures 12 and 13). A total of 185 rock chip samples were collected during the mapping phase with analytical results up to 17.3 g/t gold, 7.69% copper and 360g/t silver returned. The veins and structures are defined by quartz-iron oxide (goethite +/- specularite) rich veins together with copper oxides. Individual mineralised structures have been mapped to be up to 1,200m long, ranging from approximately 0.5m to over 8m wide. The mapped structures commonly strike NNE and dip both steeply east and west. Very little drilling has been undertaken previously to test these structures. Mapping and a topographic survey in the central part of the Project has also highlighted a number of areas that host historical workings, confirming the prospectivity of the Project. Only limited information is available on these workings. Figure 12 Example of historical workings – Viscacha Shaft at the Cerro Verde Project An orientation ground magnetic survey was completed during April 2012. This survey shows that some of the main structures can be mapped using this technique. Further exploration will comprise detailed rock chip sampling, geological structural mapping and geophysical surveying prior to drilling. A number of areas within the Project area, that may host extensions to the delineated mineralisation, remain unexplored and warrant first pass sampling and mapping. These include more than 4km of strike to the north, 2km of strike to the south and 1km of strike to the east of the recently mapped area. 11  Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Review of Operations (continued) Figure 13 Rock chip sample locations with gold values and mapped structures at the Cerro Verde Project The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Michael Fowler, Genesis Minerals Limited’s Managing Director, who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Michael Fowler has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 JORC Code. Michael Fowler consents to the inclusion in the announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. 12 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors’ Report Your directors submit their report on the consolidated entity (referred to hereafter as the Group) consisting of Genesis Minerals Limited and the entities it controlled at the end of, or during, the year ended 30 June 2012. DIRECTORS The names and details of the Company's directors in office during the financial year and until the date of this report are as follows. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated. Information on Directors Michael Haynes, BSc (Hons) (Non-Executive Chairman) Mr Haynes has more than 19 years’ experience in the resources industry. He graduated from the University of Western Australia with an honours degree in geology and geophysics and has been intimately involved in the exploration and development of a wide variety of ore deposit styles throughout the world. Mr Haynes has held technical positions with both BHP Minerals and Billiton plc. He ran his own successful consulting business for a number of years providing professional geophysical and exploration services to both junior and major resource companies. He has worked extensively on project generation and acquisition throughout his career and has been instrumental in the incorporation, financing and ongoing management of numerous junior resources companies. Mr Haynes is a Non-executive Director of Black Range Minerals Limited (appointed 27 June 2005) and Birimian Gold Limited (appointed 24 May 2011) and Chairman of Overland Resources Limited (appointed 9 May 2005) and Coventry Resources Limited (appointed 27 October 2009). Michael Fowler, BSc, MSc, MAusIMM (Managing Director) Mr Fowler is a geologist with 23 years of experience in the resources industry. He graduated from Curtin University in 1988 with a Bachelor of Applied Science degree majoring in geology and in 1999 received a Master of Science majoring in Ore Deposit Geology from the University of Western Australia. On graduating he explored for gold and base metals for Dominion Mining in the Murchison, Gascoyne and Eastern Goldfields Regions of Western Australia. In 1996, Mr Fowler joined Croesus Mining NL and was made Exploration Manager in 1997. He oversaw all exploration for Croesus until June 2004 and was then appointed Business Development Manager and subsequently Managing Director in October 2005. Mr Fowler has overseen the discovery and development of several significant gold deposits. He has been intimately involved in a number of significant acquisitions and project reviews. He has recently worked as the Exploration Manager for Castle Minerals in Ghana. Mr Fowler has not held any other directorships in the last 3 years. Damian Delaney, (Non-Executive Director, appointed 21 March 2012) Mr Delaney is a Chartered Accountant with many years of experience working with international listed companies. Mr Delaney commenced his career in South Africa, qualifying with Coopers & Lybrand, before taking up a series of positions in the United Kingdom. He was until recently Managing Director of ASX listed Nimrodel Resources Ltd. He has worked in the resource sector for the past 7 years where he has been involved in numerous capital raisings. Mr Delaney is fully conversant with all regulatory requirements of the Australian markets and has significant experience managing all aspects of company financial and regulatory reporting. Mr Delaney is also a director of Stirling Resources Ltd, Redbank Copper Ltd and Swan Gold Mining Ltd. Graeme Smith was a non-executive director from the beginning of the financial year until his resignation on 21 March 2012. COMPANY SECRETARY Damian Delaney, appointed 20 September 2012. Graeme Smith, resigned 20 September 2012. Interests in the shares and options of the company and related bodies corporate As at the date of this report, the interests of the directors in the shares and options of Genesis Minerals Limited were: Michael Haynes Michael Fowler Damian Delaney Ordinary Shares 993,334 3,247,917 345,000 Options over Ordinary Shares 1,000,000 3,581,252 4,345,003 PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES The principal activities of the Group during the year were the acquisition of mining tenements, and the exploration of these tenements with the objective of identifying economic mineral deposits. DIVIDENDS No dividends were paid or declared during the year. No recommendation for payment of dividends has been made. 13 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors' Report continued OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW Finance Review The Group has recorded an operating loss after income tax for the year ended 30 June 2012 of $5,117,531 (2011: $2,497,617). At 30 June 2012 cash assets available totalled $2,040,132 (2011: $1,556,883). Operating Results for the Year Summarised operating results are as follows: 2012 2011 Revenues $ Results $ Revenues $ Results $ Group revenues and loss from ordinary activities before income tax expense 48,057 (5,117,531) 38,977 (2,497,617) Shareholder Returns Basic and diluted loss per share (cents) 2012 (5.9) 2011 (4.2) Risk Management The board is responsible for ensuring that risks, and also opportunities, are identified on a timely basis and that activities are aligned with the risks and opportunities identified by the board. The Group believes that it is crucial for all board members to be a part of this process, and as such the board has not established a separate risk management committee. The board has a number of mechanisms in place to ensure that management's objectives and activities are aligned with the risks identified by the board. These include the following: • Board approval of a strategic plan, which encompasses strategy statements designed to meet stakeholders needs and manage business risk. Implementation of board approved operating plans and budgets and board monitoring of progress against these budgets. • SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS The Group raised $500,000 through the issue of 3,333,333 ordinary shares to institutional and sophisticated investors in March 2012. The Group raised $2,200,000 through the issue of 22,000,000 ordinary shares as approved by shareholders at the general meeting on 21 March 2012. At this meeting, 5,000,000 ordinary shares were issued upon the conversion of convertible notes with a face value of $500,000. The Group also raised $1,353,157 from the issue of 13,531,569 ordinary shares through an Entitlements Issue completed in May 2012. Funds raised are being used to actively pursue the Group’s exploration projects. AFTER BALANCE DATE EVENTS No matters or circumstances, besides those disclosed at Note 19, have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years. LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS The Group expects to maintain the present status and level of operations and hence there are no likely developments in the entity's operations. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE The Group is subject to significant environmental regulation in respect to its exploration activities. The Group aims to ensure the appropriate standard of environmental care is achieved, and in doing so, that it is aware of and is in compliance with all environmental legislation. The directors of the Group are not aware of any breach of environmental legislation for the year under review. The directors have considered the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (the NGER Act) which introduces a single national reporting framework for the reporting and dissemination of information about greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gas projects, and energy use and production of corporations. At the current stage of development, the directors have determined that the NGER Act will have no effect on the Group for the current, nor subsequent, financial year. The directors will reassess this position as and when the need arises. 14 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors' Report continued REMUNERATION REPORT The information provided in this remuneration report has been audited as required by section 308(3C) of the Corporations Act 2001. Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration Remuneration Policy The remuneration policy of Genesis Minerals Limited has been designed to align director and executive objectives with shareholder and business objectives by providing a fixed remuneration component and offering specific long-term incentives based on key performance areas affecting the Group’s financial results. The board of Genesis Minerals Limited believes the remuneration policy to be appropriate and effective in its ability to attract and retain the best executives and directors to run and manage the Group. The board’s policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration for board members and senior executives of the Group is as follows: The remuneration policy, setting the terms and conditions for the executive directors and other senior executives, was developed by the board. All executives receive a base salary (which is based on factors such as length of service and experience) and superannuation. The board reviews executive packages annually by reference to the Group’s performance, executive performance and comparable information from industry sectors and other listed companies in similar industries. The board may exercise discretion in relation to approving incentives, bonuses and options. The policy is designed to attract the highest calibre of executives and reward them for performance that results in long-term growth in shareholder wealth. Executives are also entitled to participate in the employee share and option arrangements. The executive directors and executives receive a superannuation guarantee contribution required by the government, which is currently 9%, and do not receive any other retirement benefits. All remuneration paid to directors and executives is valued at the cost to the company and expensed. Options are valued using the Black-Scholes methodology. The board policy is to remunerate non-executive directors at market rates for comparable companies for time, commitment and responsibilities. The board determines payments to the non-executive directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on market practice, duties and accountability. Independent external advice is sought when required. The maximum aggregate amount of fees that can be paid to non-executive directors is subject to approval by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting (currently $300,000). Fees for non-executive directors are not linked to the performance of the Group. However, to align directors’ interests with shareholder interests, the directors are encouraged to hold shares in the company and are able to participate in the employee option plan. Performance based remuneration The company currently has no performance based remuneration component built into director and executive remuneration packages. Group performance, shareholder wealth and directors' and executives' remuneration The remuneration policy has been tailored to increase the direct positive relationship between shareholders’ investment objectives and directors and executive’s performance. The Group plans to facilitate this process by directors and executives participating in future option issues to encourage the alignment of personal and shareholder interests. The Group believes this policy will be effective in increasing shareholder wealth. For details of directors and executives interests in options at year end, refer to note 13 of the financial statements. Use of remuneration consultants The Group did not employ the services of any remuneration consultants during the financial year ended 30 June 2012. Voting and comments made at the Company’s 2011 Annual General Meeting The Company received approximately 91% of “yes” votes on its remuneration report for the 2011 financial year. The Company did not receive any specific feedback at the AGM or throughout the year on its remuneration practices. Details of remuneration Details of the remuneration of the directors and the key management personnel of the Group are set out in the following table. The key management personnel of the Group include the directors and company secretary as per page 13 above. Given the size and nature of operations of the Group, there are no other employees who are required to have their remuneration disclosed in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001. 15 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors' Report continued Key management personnel of the Group Short-Term Post Employment Share-based Payments Total Directors Michael Haynes 2012 2011 Michael Fowler 2012 2011 Salary & Fees $ 54,500 54,500 221,736 188,750 Damian Delaney (appointed 21 March 2012) 2012 7,500 Graeme Smith (resigned 21 March 2012) 2012 2011 22,500 30,000 Total key management personnel compensation 2012 2011 306,236 273,250 Non-Monetary Superannuation $ $ Retirement benefits $ Options $ $ - - - - - - - - - - - 19,956 18,875 - 2,025 2,700 21,981 21,575 - - - - - - - - - 53,038 21,896 202,046 65,689 107,538 76,396 443,738 273,314 343,470 350,970 8,083 17,517 32,608 50,217 606,637 105,102 934,854 399,927 Service agreements On 25 June 2007 the Company entered into an Executive Service Agreement with Mr Michael Fowler. Under the Agreement, Mr Michael Fowler is engaged by the Company to provide services to the Company in the capacity of Managing Director and CEO. Mr Fowler was paid a salary of $275,000 per annum (plus 10% superannuation entitlement). The Agreement was effective from the date the Company was admitted to the Official List (30 July 2007) and continues until terminated by either Mr Fowler or the Company. Mr Fowler is entitled to a minimum notice period of three months from the Company and the Company is entitled to a minimum notice period of three months from Mr Fowler. Share-based compensation Options are issued at no cost to directors and executives as part of their remuneration. The options are not issued based on performance criteria, but are issued to the majority of directors and executives of Genesis Minerals Limited to increase goal congruence between executives, directors and shareholders. The following options over ordinary shares of the Company were granted to or vesting with key management personnel during the year: Grant Date Granted Number Vesting Date Expiry Date Exercise Price (cents) Value per option at grant date (cents) Exercised Number % of Remuneration Directors Michael Haynes 21/03/2012 500,000 11/04/2012 31/12/2014 22.0 Michael Fowler Damian Delaney 21/03/2012 21/03/2012 2,000,000 4,000,000 11/04/2012 11/04/2012 31/12/2014 31/12/2014 22.0 22.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 N/A N/A N/A 39.9 38.7 97.9 (1) These options vest upon the achievement of a JORC Code compliant resource of 750,000oz of gold (or equivalent value in other minerals). Management have estimated that this performance condition will be satisfied by 30 June 2012. End of Remuneration Report 16 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors' Report continued DIRECTORS' MEETINGS During the financial year three meetings of directors were held. Attendances by each director during the year were as follows: Michael Haynes Michael Fowler Damian Delaney (appointed 21 March 2012) Graeme Smith (resigned 21 March 2012) Notes A – Number of meetings attended. B – Number of meetings held during the time the director held office during the year. Directors Meetings A 3 3 1 2 B 3 3 1 2 SHARES UNDER OPTION At the date of this report there are 53,681,788 unissued ordinary shares in respect of which options are outstanding. Balance at the beginning of the year Movements of share options during the year Issued, exercisable at 12 cents, on or before 1 March 2013 Issued, exercisable at 15 cents, on or before 1 March 2014 Issued, exercisable at 20 cents, on or before 1 March 2015 Issued, exercisable at 22 cents, on or before 31 December 2014 Expired on 15 May 2012, exercisable at 20 cents Total number of options outstanding as at 30 June 2012 and the date of this report The balance is comprised of the following: Expiry date 30 September 2012 1 March 2013 1 March 2014 23 August 2013 1 March 2015 23 August 2013 28 February 2013 31 December 2014 30 November 2013 Exercise price (cents) 10 12 15 15 20 20 20 22 31 Total number of options outstanding at the date of this report Number of options 12,900,000 13,510,596 13,510,596 13,510,596 9,500,000 (9,250,000) 53,681,788 Number of options 600,000 13,510,596 13,510,596 75,000 13,510,596 75,000 500,000 9,500,000 2,400,000 53,681,788 No person entitled to exercise any option referred to above has or had, by virtue of the option, a right to participate in any share issue of any other body corporate. INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS During or since the financial year, the company has paid premiums insuring all the directors of Genesis Minerals Limited against costs incurred in defending proceedings for conduct involving: (a) a wilful breach of duty; or (b) a contravention of sections 182 or 183 of the Corporations Act 2001, as permitted by section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001. The total amount of insurance contract premiums paid is $12,460 (2011: $8,905). NON-AUDIT SERVICES There were no non-audit services provided by the entity's auditor, Bentleys, or associated entities. 17 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors' Report continued PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on behalf of the company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the company is a party, for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the company for all or any part of those proceedings. No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the company with leave of the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001. GOING CONCERN The accounts have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal business activities and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Group incurred a loss from ordinary activities of $5,117,531 for the year ended 30 June 2012 (2011: $2,497,617). Included within this loss was the write off of exploration expenditure of $3,297,467 (2011: $1,475,095). The net working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2012 was $1,746,444 (2011: $1,453,537) and the net increase in cash held during the year was $485,582 (2011: $1,338,146 increase). The ability of the Group to continue to pay its debts as and when they fall due is dependent upon the Group successfully raising additional share capital and ultimately developing one of its mineral properties. The Directors believe it is appropriate to prepare these accounts on a going concern basis because the Directors have an appropriate plan to contain certain operating and exploration expenditure if additional required funding is unavailable. Refer to note 1(a) for further details. AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION A copy of the auditor's independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out on page 19. This Report of the Directors, incorporating the Remuneration Report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors. Michael Fowler Managing Director Perth, 24 September 2012 18 To The Board of Directors As lead audit director for the audit of the financial statements of of Genesis Minerals Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2012, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of: the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. Yours faithfully BENTLEYS Chartered Accountants RANKO MATIC CA Director DATED at PERTH this 24th day of September 2012 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Corporate Governance Statement The Board of Directors The company's constitution provides that the number of directors shall not be less than three and not more than nine. There is no requirement for any shareholding qualification. As and if the company's activities increase in size, nature and scope the size of the Board will be reviewed periodically, and as circumstances demand. The optimum number of directors required to supervise adequately the company's constitution will be determined within the limitations imposed by the constitution. The membership of the Board, its activities and composition, is subject to periodic review. The criteria for determining the identification and appointment of a suitable candidate for the Board shall include quality of the individual, background of experience and achievement, compatibility with other Board members, credibility within the company's scope of activities, intellectual ability to contribute to Board's duties and physical ability to undertake Board's duties and responsibilities. Directors are initially appointed by the full Board subject to election by shareholders at the next general meeting. Under the company's constitution the tenure of a director (other than managing director, and only one managing director where the position is jointly held) is subject to reappointment by shareholders not later than the third anniversary following his or her last appointment. Subject to the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, the Board does not subscribe to the principle of retirement age and there is no maximum period of service as a director. A managing director may be appointed for any period and on any terms the directors think fit and, subject to the terms of any agreement entered into, may revoke any appointment. The Board considers that the company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity to justify the formation of separate or special committees (other than an Audit Committee) at this time. The Board as a whole is able to address the governance aspects of the full scope of the company's activities and to ensure that it adheres to appropriate ethical standards. Role of the Board The Board's primary role is the protection and enhancement of long-term shareholder value. To fulfil this role, the Board is responsible for oversight of management and the overall corporate governance of the company including its strategic direction, establishing goals for management and monitoring the achievement of these goals. Appointments to Other Boards Directors are required to take into consideration any potential conflicts of interest when accepting appointments to other boards. Independent Professional Advice The Board has determined that individual directors have the right in connection with their duties and responsibilities as directors, to seek independent professional advice at the company's expense. With the exception of expenses for legal advice in relation to director's rights and duties, the engagement of an outside adviser is subject to prior approval of the Chairman and this will not be withheld unreasonably. Continuous Review of Corporate Governance Directors consider, on an ongoing basis, how management information is presented to them and whether such information is sufficient to enable them to discharge their duties as directors of the company. Such information must be sufficient to enable the directors to determine appropriate operating and financial strategies from time to time in light of changing circumstances and economic conditions. The directors recognise that mining exploration is an inherently risky business and that operational strategies adopted should, notwithstanding, be directed towards improving or maintaining the net worth of the company. ASX Principles of Good Corporate Governance The Board has reviewed its current practices in light of the revised ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations with a view to making amendments where applicable after considering the company's size and the resources it has available. As the company's activities develop in size, nature and scope, the size of the Board and the implementation of any additional formal corporate governance committees will be given further consideration. The Board has adopted the revised Recommendations and the following table sets out the company's present position in relation to each of the revised Principles. 20 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Corporate Governance Statement continued ASX Principle Status Reference/comment Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for 1.1 1.2 1.3 management and oversight Companies should establish the functions reserved to the board and those delegated to senior executives and disclose those functions Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of senior executives A A Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 1 A (in part) Principle 2: 2.1 Structure the board to add value A majority of the board should be independent directors 2.2 2.3 2.4 The chair should be an independent director The roles of chair and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual The board should establish a nomination committee A A A A 2.5 Companies should disclose the N/A 2.6 process for evaluating the performance of the board, its committees and individual directors Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 2 Principle 3: Promote ethical and responsible Matters reserved for the Board are included on the Company website in the Corporate Governance Section. The remuneration of management and employees is reviewed by the Managing Director and approved by the Board. Acting in its ordinary capacity the Board from time to time carries out the process of considering and determining performance issues. Matters reserved for the Board can be viewed on the Company website. Given the Group’s background, the nature and size of its business and the current stage of its development, the board comprises three directors, two of whom are non-executive. The board believes that this is both appropriate and acceptable at this stage of the Group’s development. The position of Chairman and Managing Director are held by separate persons. The full Board is the Nomination Committee. Acting in its ordinary capacity from time to time as required, the Board carries out the process of determining the need for screening and appointing new Directors. In view of the size and resources available to the Group it is not considered that a separate Nomination Committee would add any substance to this process. Given the size and nature of the Group a formal process for performance evaluation has not been developed. A (in part) The skills and experience of the Directors are set out in the Group’s Annual Report and on the website. 3.1 3.2 decision-making Companies should establish a code of A N/A conduct and disclose the code Companies should establish a policy concerning diversity and disclose the policy or a summary of that policy. The policy should include requirements for the Board to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and for the Board to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them The Group has established a Code of Conduct which can be viewed on its website. The Company has established a Diversity Policy, however, the policy does not include requirements for the board to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity. Given the Company’s size and stage of development as an exploration company, the board does not think it is yet appropriate to include measurable objectives in relation to gender. As the Company grows and requires more employees, the Company will review this policy and amend as appropriate. 3.3 Companies should disclose in each N/A annual report the measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity set by the Board in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving them The Company has established a Diversity Policy, however, the policy does not include requirements for the board to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity. Given the Company’s size and stage of development as an exploration company, the board does not think it is yet appropriate to include measurable objectives in relation to gender. A = Adopted N/A = Not adopted 21 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Corporate Governance Statement continued ASX Principle Status Reference/comment 3.4 3.5 Companies should disclose in each annual report the proportion of women employees in the whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and women on the board. Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 3 Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in financial 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 reporting The board should establish an audit committee The audit committee should be structured so that it: • • consists only of non-executive directors consists of a majority of independent directors is chaired by an independent chair, who is not chair of the board • has at least three members The audit committee should have a • formal charter Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 4 A A A A A A N/A A A Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure 5.1 Companies should establish written A policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance and disclose those policies or a summary of those policies 5.2 Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 5 Principle 6: 6.1 6.2 Respect the rights of shareholders Companies should design a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and encouraging their participation at general meetings and disclose their policy or a summary of that policy Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 6 The proportion of women employees in the whole organisation is 33% (excluding directors). There are currently no women in senior executive positions. There are currently no women on the board. The Company only has two non-executive directors. Directors must obtain the approval of the Chairman of the Board and notify the Company Secretary before they buy or sell shares in the Company, and it is subject to Board veto. Directors must provide the information required by the Company to ensure Compliance with Listing Rule 3.19A. A A The Board receives monthly reports on the status of the Group’s activities and any new proposed activities. Disclosure is reviewed as a routine agenda item at each Board Meeting. In line with adherence to continuous disclosure requirements of the ASX all shareholders are kept informed of major developments affecting the Group. This disclosure is through regular shareholder communications including the Annual report, Quarterly Reports, the Company Website and the distributions of specific releases covering major transactions and events. A The Group has formulated a Communication Policy which is included in its Corporate Governance Statement on the Company Website. A = Adopted N/A = Not adopted 22 N/A While the Group does not have formalised policies on risk management the Board recognises its responsibility for identifying areas of significant business risk and for ensuring that arrangements are in place for adequately managing these risks. This issue is regularly reviewed at Board meetings and risk management culture is encouraged amongst employees and contractors. Determined areas of risk which are regularly considered include: • • • • • • performance and funding of exploration activities budget control and asset protection status of mineral tenements compliance with government laws and regulations safety and the environment continuous disclosure obligations N/A While the Group does not have formalised risk management policies it recognises its responsibility for identifying areas of significant business risk and ensuring that arrangements are in place to adequately manage these risks. This issue is regularly reviewed at Board meetings and a risk management culture is encouraged amongst employees and contractors. A Assurances received from CEO and CFO (or equivalent) each year. Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Corporate Governance Statement continued ASX Principle Status Reference/comment Principle 7: 7.1 Recognise and manage risk Companies should establish policies for the oversight and management of material business risks and disclose a summary of those policies 7.2 The board should require management to design and implement the risk management and internal control system to manage the company’s material business risks and report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. The board should disclose that management has reported to it as to the effectiveness of the company’s management of its material business risks The board should disclose whether it has received assurance from the chief executive officer (or equivalent) and the chief financial officer (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 7 7.3 7.4 Principle 8: 8.1 Remunerate fairly and responsibly The board should establish a remuneration committee 8.2 The remuneration committee should be structured so that it: • consists of a majority of independent directors A A N/A • is chaired by an independent director N/A • has at least three members A A = Adopted N/A = Not adopted 23 The Group established a Remuneration Committee consisting of three is classified as non-executive directors, only one of whom independent. As there is only one independent director, it is not possible to have an independent chair that is not chair of the board. Sourcing alternative directors to strictly comply with this Principle is considered expensive with costs outweighing the potential benefits. The Group has established a Remuneration Committee consisting of three non-executive directors, only one of whom is classified as independent. As there is only one independent director, it is not possible to have an independent chair that is not chair of the board. Sourcing alternative directors to strictly comply with this Principle is considered expensive with costs outweighing the potential benefits. Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Corporate Governance Statement continued ASX Principle Status Reference/comment 8.3 8.4 Companies should clearly distinguish the structure of non-executive directors’ remuneration from that of executive directors and senior executives Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 8 A A A = Adopted N/A = Not adopted Refer to the Annual Report and the Corporate Governance section of the Company’s website. 24 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 REVENUE EXPENDITURE Depreciation expense Salaries and employee benefits expense Exploration expenses Impairment expense Corporate expenses Administration costs Finance costs Share based payments expense LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX INCOME TAX BENEFIT/(EXPENSE) LOSS FOR THE YEAR OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)/INCOME Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Other comprehensive (loss)/income for the year, net of tax Notes 2012 $ 4 48,057 (4,142) (440,658) (3,297,467) (151,084) (177,715) (204,651) (25,633) (864,238) 22 5 6 2011 $ 38,977 (1,732) (330,944) (1,475,095) (137,426) (170,304) (242,731) - (178,362) (5,117,531) (2,497,617) - - (5,117,531) (2,497,617) (2,517) (2,517) 48,292 48,292 TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR ATTRIBUTABLE TO MEMBERS OF GENESIS MINERALS LIMITED (5,120,048) (2,449,325) Basic and diluted loss per share (cents per share) 21 (5.9) (4.2) The above Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 25 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Consolidated Statement of Financial Position AT 30 JUNE 2012 CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS NON-CURRENT ASSETS Plant and equipment TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS CURRENT LIABILITIES Trade and other payables TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES NET ASSETS EQUITY Issued capital Reserves Accumulated losses TOTAL EQUITY Notes 7 8 9 10 2012 $ 2,040,132 18,549 2,058,681 12,906 12,906 2011 $ 1,556,883 7,437 1,564,320 13,196 13,196 2,071,587 1,577,516 312,237 312,237 312,237 110,783 110,783 110,783 1,759,350 1,466,733 11 12(a) 12,397,575 1,215,631 (11,853,856) 7,849,148 353,910 (6,736,325) 1,759,350 1,466,733 The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 26 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 BALANCE AT 1 JULY 2010 Loss for the year OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS IN THEIR CAPACITY AS OWNERS Shares issued during the year Share issue transaction costs Share based payments Notes Ordinary Share Capital $ Options Reserve $ Foreign Currency Translation Reserve $ Accumulated Losses $ Total $ 4,268,799 - 96,475 - 30,781 - (4,238,708) (2,497,617) 157,347 (2,497,617) 12(a) - - - - 48,292 48,292 - (2,497,617) 48,292 (2,449,325) 11 11 3,796,798 (216,449) - - - 178,362 - - - - - - 3,796,798 (216,449) 178,362 BALANCE AT 30 JUNE 2011 7,849,148 274,837 79,073 (6,736,325) 1,466,733 Loss for the year OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS IN THEIR CAPACITY AS OWNERS Shares issued during the year Share issue transaction costs Value of conversion rights on convertible notes Share based payments 12(a) 11 11 11 12(a) - - - 4,597,257 (74,463) - - - - - 25,633 - - 864,238 - (5,117,531) (5,117,531) (2,517) (2,517) - (5,117,531) (2,517) (5,120,048) - - - - - - - - 4,597,257 (74,463) 25,633 864,238 BALANCE AT 30 JUNE 2012 12,397,575 1,139,075 76,556 (11,853,856) 1,759,350 The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 27 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Payments to suppliers and employees Payments for exploration expenditure Interest received NET CASH OUTFLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Payments for plant and equipment NET CASH OUTFLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from borrowings Proceeds from issues of ordinary shares Payments of share issue costs NET CASH INFLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Notes 20(a) 2012 $ (654,718) (3,352,607) 30,249 (3,977,076) 2011 $ (703,865) (1,465,239) 32,344 (2,136,760) (4,036) (4,036) (14,443) (14,443) 500,000 4,041,157 (74,463) 4,466,694 485,582 1,556,883 (2,333) - 3,705,798 (216,449) 3,489,349 1,338,146 219,252 (515) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR 7 2,040,132 1,556,883 The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 28 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. The financial statements are for the Group consisting of Genesis Minerals Limited and its subsidiaries (“the Group”). The financial statements are presented in the Australian currency. Genesis Minerals Limited is a company limited by shares, domiciled and incorporated in Australia. The financial statements were authorised for issue by the directors on 24 September 2012. The directors have the power to amend and reissue the financial statements. (a) Basis of preparation These general purpose financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 2001. Genesis Minerals Limited is a for-profit entity for the purpose of preparing the financial statements. (i) Compliance with IFRS The consolidated financial statements of the Genesis Minerals Limited Group also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (ii) New and amended standards adopted by the Group None of the new standards and amendments to standards that are mandatory for the first time for the financial year beginning 1 July 2012 affected any of the amounts recognised in the current period or any prior period and are not likely to affect future periods. (iii) Early adoption of standards The Group has not elected to apply any pronouncements before their operative date in the annual reporting period beginning 1 July 2012. (iv) Historical cost convention These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets, which have been measured at fair value. (v) Going concern The accounts have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates continuity of normal business activities and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Group incurred a loss from ordinary activities of $5,117,531 for the year ended 30 June 2012 (2011: $2,497,617). Included within this loss was exploration expenditure of $3,297,466 (2011: $1,475,095). The net working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2012 was $1,746,444 (2011: $1,453,537) and the net increase in cash held during the year was $485,582 (2011: $1,338,146). The Group has expenditure commitments relating to work programme obligations of their assets of $2,200,000 which potentially could fall due in the twelve months to 30 June 2013. The ability of the Group to continue to pay its debts as and when they fall due is dependent upon the Group successfully raising additional share capital and ultimately developing one of its mineral properties. The Directors believe it is appropriate to prepare these accounts on a going concern basis because: • • the Directors have an appropriate plan to raise additional funds as and when it is required. In light of the Group’s current exploration projects, the Directors believe that the additional capital required can be raised in the market; and the Directors have an appropriate plan to contain certain operating and exploration expenditure if appropriate funding is unavailable. Should the Group not be able to successfully raise capital if required, it may be necessary to sell some of its assets, farm out exploration projects, reduce exploration expenditure by various methods including surrendering less prospective tenements. Although the Directors believe that they will be successful in these measures, if they are not, the Group may be unable to continue as a going concern and therefore may be unable to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the financial report. (b) Principles of consolidation (i) Subsidiaries The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Genesis Minerals Limited (“Company” or “parent entity”) as at 30 June 2012 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. Genesis Minerals Limited and its subsidiaries together are referred to in this financial report as the Group. Subsidiaries are all entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the Group controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for business combinations by the Group. 29 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. Non-controlling interests in the results and equity of subsidiaries are shown separately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of financial position respectively. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the separate financial statements of Genesis Minerals Limited. (ii) Changes in ownership interests The Group treats transactions with non-controlling interests that do not result in a loss of control as transactions with equity owners of the Group. A change in ownership interest results in an adjustment between the carrying amounts of the controlling and non-controlling interests to reflect their relative interests in the subsidiary. Any difference between the amount of the adjustment to non-controlling interests and any consideration paid or received is recognised in a separate reserve within equity attributable to owners of Genesis Minerals Limited. When the Group ceases to have control, joint control or significant influence, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, jointly controlled entity or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss. If the ownership interest in a jointly controlled entity or associate is reduced but joint control or significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate. (c) Segment reporting Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the full Board of Directors. (d) Foreign currency translation (i) Functional and presentation currency Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Australian dollars, which is Genesis Minerals Limited's functional and presentation currency. (ii) Transactions and balances Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or loss, except when they are deferred in equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges or are attributable to part of the net investment in a foreign operation. Translation differences on financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are reported as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets and liabilities such as equities held at fair value through profit or loss are recognised in profit or loss as part of the fair value gain or loss. Translation differences on non-monetary financial assets such as equities classified as available-for-sale financial assets are included in the fair value reserve in equity. (iii) Group companies The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:   assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position; income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates (unless that is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the dates of the transactions); and all resulting exchange differences are recognised other comprehensive income.  On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of any net investment in foreign entities, and of borrowings and other financial instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are recognised in other comprehensive income. When a foreign operation is sold or any borrowings forming part of the net investment are repaid, the associated exchange differences are reclassified to profit or loss, as part of the gain or loss on sale. 30 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) (e) Revenue recognition Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial assets. (f) Income tax The income tax expense or revenue for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the applicable income tax rate for each jurisdiction adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences and to unused tax losses. The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the end of the reporting period in the countries where the Company’s subsidiaries and associated operate and generate taxable income. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit nor loss. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the reporting date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled. Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses only if it is probable that future taxable amounts will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority. Current tax assets and tax liabilities are offset where the entity has a legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively. (g) Leases Leases of property, plant and equipment where the Group, as lessee, has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the lease’s inception at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, are included in other short- term and long-term payables. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance cost. The finance cost is charged to profit or loss over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term. Leases where a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are not transferred to the Group as lessee are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. (h) Impairment of assets Goodwill and intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired. Other assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets other than goodwill that suffered impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date. (i) Cash and cash equivalents For statement of cash flows presentation purposes, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities on the statement of financial position. 31 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) (j) Trade and other receivables Receivables are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less a provision for any uncollectible debts. An estimate for doubtful debts is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written-off as incurred. (k) Investments and other financial assets Classification The Group classifies its investments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments and available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which the investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial recognition and, in the case of assets classified as held-to-maturity, re-evaluates this designation at each reporting date. (i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term. Derivatives are classified as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets. (ii) Loans and receivables Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for those with maturities greater than 12 months after the reporting date which are classified as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are included in trade and other receivables in the statement of financial position. (iii) Held-to-maturity investments Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that the Group’s management has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. If the Group were to sell other than an insignificant amount of held-to-maturity financial assets, the whole category would be tainted and reclassified as available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity financial assets are included in non-current assets, except for those with maturities less than 12 months from the reporting date, which are classified as current assets. (iv) Available-for-sale financial assets Available-for-sale financial assets, comprising principally marketable equity securities, are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the reporting date. Investments are designated available-for-sale if they do not have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments and management intends to hold them for the medium to long term. Financial assets - reclassification The Group may choose to reclassify a non-derivative trading financial asset out of the held-for-trading category if the financial asset is no longer held for the purpose of selling it in the near term. Financial assets other than loans and receivables are permitted to be reclassified out of the held-for-trading category only in rare circumstances arising from a single event that is unusual and highly unlikely to recur in the near term. In addition, the Group may choose to reclassify financial assets that would meet the definition of loans and receivables out of the held-for-trading or available-for-sale categories if the Group has the intention and ability to hold these financial assets for the foreseeable future or until maturity at the date of reclassification. Reclassifications are made at fair value as of the reclassification date. Fair value becomes the new cost or amortised cost as applicable, and no reversals of fair value gains or losses recorded before reclassification date are subsequently made. Effective interest rates for financial assets reclassified to loans and receivables and held-to-maturity categories are determined at the reclassification date. Further increases in estimates of cash flows adjust effective interest rates prospectively. Recognition and derecognition Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on trade-date – the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognised at fair value and transaction costs are expensed to the statement of comprehensive income. Financial assets are derecognised when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. When securities classified as available-for-sale are sold, the accumulated fair value adjustments recognised in equity are included in the statement of comprehensive income as gains and losses from investment securities. Measurement At initial recognition, the Group measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transactions costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss are expensed in profit or loss. Loans and receivables and held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. 32 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’ category are presented in the statement of comprehensive income within other income or other expenses in the period in which they arise. Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as part of revenue from continuing operations when the Group’s right to receive payments is established. Changes in the fair value of monetary securities denominated in a foreign currency and classified as available-for-sale are analysed between translation differences resulting from changes in amortised cost of the security and other changes in the carrying amount of the security. The translation differences related to changes in the amortised cost are recognised in profit or loss, and other changes in carrying amount are recognised in equity. Changes in the fair value of other monetary and non-monetary securities classified as available-for-sale are recognised in equity. Details on how the fair value of financial investments is determined are disclosed in note 2. Impairment The Group assesses at the end of each reporting period whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (a ‘loss event’) and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. In the case of equity investments classified as available-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost is considered an indicator that the assets are impaired. (i) Assets carried at amortised cost For loans and receivables, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced and the amount of the loss is recognised in profit or loss. If a loan or held-to-maturity investment has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the contract. As a practical expedient, the Group may measure impairment on the basis of an instrument’s fair value using an observable market price. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised (such as an improvement in the debtor’s credit rating), the reversal of the previously recognised impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss. (ii) Assets classified as available-for-sale If there is objective evidence of impairment for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss – measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognised in profit or loss – is removed from equity and recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses on equity instruments that were recognised in profit or loss are not reversed through profit or loss in a subsequent period. If the fair value of a debt instrument classified as available-for-sale increases in a subsequent period and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss, the impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss. (l) Plant and equipment All plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of any component accounted for as a separate asset is derecognised when replaced. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the statement of comprehensive income during the reporting period in which they are incurred. Depreciation of plant and equipment is calculated using the reducing balance method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts, net of their residual values, over their estimated useful lives or, in the case of leasehold improvements and certain leased plant and equipment, the shorter lease term. The rates vary between 20% and 40% per annum. The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each reporting date. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount (note 1(h)). Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in the statement of comprehensive income. When revalued assets are sold, it is Group policy to transfer the amounts included in other reserves in respect of those assets to retained earnings. 33 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) (m) Exploration and evaluation costs Exploration and evaluation costs are expensed as incurred. (n) Trade and other payables These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the Group prior to the end of the financial year which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are paid on normal commercial terms. (o) Employee benefits (i) Wages and salaries and annual leave Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, and annual leave expected to be settled within 12 months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. (ii) Share-based payments The Group provides benefits to employees (including directors) of the Group in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services in exchange for shares or rights over shares (‘equity-settled transactions’), refer to note 22. The cost of these equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an internal valuation using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The cost of equity-settled transactions is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the performance conditions are fulfilled, ending on the date on which the relevant employees become fully entitled to the award (‘vesting date’). The cumulative expense recognised for equity-settled transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the number of options that, in the opinion of the directors of the Group, will ultimately vest. This opinion is formed based on the best available information at balance date. No adjustment is made for the likelihood of market performance conditions being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the determination of fair value at grant date. No expense is recognised for awards that do not ultimately vest, except for awards where vesting is conditional upon a market condition. Where an equity-settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if it had vested on the date of cancellation, and any expense not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. However, if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is granted, the cancelled and new award are treated as if they were a modification of the original award. (p) Issued capital Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options for the acquisition of a business are not included in the cost of the acquisition as part of the purchase consideration. (q) Earnings per share (i) Basic earnings per share Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to owners of the Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the year. (ii) Diluted earnings per share Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential ordinary shares. (r) Goods and Services Tax (GST) Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not recoverable from the taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense. Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the statement of financial position. Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities which are recoverable from, or payable to the taxation authority, are presented as operating cash flows. 34 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) (s) New accounting standards and interpretations Certain new accounting standards and interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for 30 June 2012 reporting periods. The Group’s assessment of the impact of these new standards and interpretations is set out below. simplifying the classifications of financial assets into those carried at amortised cost and those carried at fair value; simplifying the requirements for embedded derivatives; removing the tainting rules associated with held-to-maturity assets; removing the requirements to separate and fair value embedded derivatives for financial assets carried at amortised cost; AASB 9: Financial Instruments (December 2010) (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard is applicable retrospectively and includes revised requirements for the classification and measurement of financial instruments, as well as recognition and derecognition requirements for financial instruments. The Group has not yet determined any potential impact on the financial statements. The key changes made to accounting requirements include:      allowing an irrevocable election on initial recognition to present gains and losses on investments in equity instruments that are not held for trading in other comprehensive income. Dividends in respect of these investments that are a return on investment can be recognised in profit or loss and there is no impairment or recycling on disposal of the instrument; requiring financial assets to be reclassified where there is a change in an entity’s business model as they are initially classified based on: (a) the objective of the entity’s business model for managing the financial assets; and (b) the characteristics of the contractual cash flows; and requiring an entity that chooses to measure a financial liability at fair value to present the portion of the change in its fair value due to changes in the entity’s own credit risk in other comprehensive income, except when that would create an accounting mismatch. If such a mismatch would be created or enlarged, the entity is required to present all changes in fair value (including the effects of changes in the credit risk of the liability) in profit or loss.   AASB 2010–7: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 (December 2011) [AASB 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 101, 102, 108, 112, 118, 120, 121, 127, 128, 131, 132, 136, 137, 139, 1023 & 1038 and Interpretations 2, 5, 10, 12, 19 & 127] (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard makes amendments to a range of Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations as a consequence of the issuance of AASB 9: Financial Instruments in December 2010. Accordingly, these amendments will only apply when the entity adopts AASB 9. As noted above, the Group has not yet determined any potential impact on the financial statements from adopting AASB 9. AASB 2010–8: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets [AASB 112] (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2012) This Standard makes amendments to AASB 112: Income Taxes. The amendments brought in by this Standard introduce a more practical approach for measuring deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets when investment property is measured using the fair value model under AASB 140: Investment Property. Under the current AASB 112, the measurement of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets depends on whether an entity expects to recover an asset by using it or by selling it. The amendments introduce a presumption that an investment property is recovered entirely through sale. This presumption is rebutted if the investment property is held within a business model whose objective is to consume substantially all of the economic benefits embodied in the investment property over time, rather than through sale. The amendments brought in by this Standard also incorporate Interpretation 121 into AASB 112. The amendments are not expected to impact the Group. AASB 2010–9: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Severe Hyperinflation and Removal of Fixed Dates for First-time Adopters [AASB 1] (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 July 2012/1 January 2013) This Standard makes amendments to AASB 1: First-time Adoption of Australian Accounting Standards. The amendments brought in by this Standard provide relief for first-time adopters of Australian Accounting Standards from having to reconstruct transactions that occurred before their date of transition to Australian Accounting Standards. Furthermore, the amendments brought in by this Standard also provide guidance for entities emerging from severe hyperinflation either to resume presenting Australian-Accounting-Standards financial statements or to present Australian-Accounting-Standards financial statements for the first time. This Standard is not expected to impact the Group. 35 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) AASB 2010–10: Further Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Removal of Fixed Dates for First-time Adopters [AASB 2009–11 & AASB 2011–7] (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard makes amendments to AASB 2009–11: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9, and AASB 2011–7: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 (December 2010). The amendments brought in by this Standard ultimately affect AASB 1: First-time Adoption of Australian Accounting Standards and provide relief for first-time adopters from having to reconstruct transactions that occurred before their transition date. [The amendments to AASB 2009–11 will only affect early adopters of AASB 2009–11 (and AASB 9: Financial Instruments that was issued in December 2009) as it has been superseded by AASB 2010–7.] This Standard is not expected to impact the Group. AASB 1054: Australian Additional Disclosures (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard is as a consequence of phase 1 of the joint Trans-Tasman Convergence project of the AASB and FRSB. This Standard relocates all Australian specific disclosures from other standards to one place and revises disclosures in the following areas:  compliance with Australian Accounting Standards;  the statutory basis or reporting framework for financial statements;  whether the financial statements are general purpose or special purpose;  audit fees; and  This Standard is not expected to impact the Group. imputation credits. AASB 2011-2: Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Trans-Tasman Convergence project – Reduced disclosure regime [AASB 101 & AASB 1054] (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 July 2013) This Standard makes amendments to the application of the revised disclosures to Tier 2 entities that are applying AASB 1053. This Standard is not expected to impact the Group. AASB 10: Consolidated Financial Statements (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard establishes a new control model that applies to all entities. It replaces parts of AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements dealing with the accounting for consolidated financial statements and Interpretation 112Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities. The new control model broadens the situations when an entity is considered to be controlled by another entity and includes new guidance for applying the model to specific situations, including when acting as a manager may give control, the impact of potential voting rights and when holding less than a majority voting rights may give control. This Standard is not expected to impact the Group. AASB 11: Joint Arrangements (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard replaces AASB 131 Interests in Joint Ventures and Interpretation 113 Jointly-Controlled Entities – Non-monetary Contributions by Ventures. AASB 11 uses the principle of control in AASB 10 to define joint control, and therefore the determination of whether joint control exists may change. In addition, AASB 11 removes the option to account for jointly controlled entities (JCEs) using proportionate consolidation. Instead, accounting for a joint arrangement is dependent on the nature of the rights and obligations arising from the arrangement. Joint operations that give the venturers a right to the underlying assets and obligations themselves is accounted for by recognising the share of those assets and obligations. Joint ventures that give the venturers a right to the net assets is accounted for using the equity method. This may result in a change in the accounting for the joint arrangements held by the Group. AASB 12: Disclosures of Interests in Other Entities (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard includes all disclosures relating to an entity’s interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates and structures entities. New disclosures have been introduced about the judgements made by management to determine whether control exists, and to require summarised information about joint arrangements, associates and structured entities and subsidiaries with non-controlling interests. The Group has not yet determined any potential impact on the financial statements. AASB 13: Fair Value Measurement (applies to periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013) This Standard establishes a single source of guidance under AASB for determining the fair value of assets and liabilities. AASB 13 does not change when an entity is required to use fair value, but rather, provides guidance on how to determine fair value under AASB when fair value is required or permitted by AASB. Application of this definition may result in different fair values being determined for the relevant assets. AASB 13 also expands the disclosure requirements for all assets or liabilities carried at fair value. This includes information about the assumptions made and the qualitative impact of those assumptions on the fair value determined. The Group has not yet determined any potential impact on the financial statements. 36 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd) AASB 119: Employee Benefits (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2013) The main change introduced by this standard is to revise the accounting for defined benefit plans. The amendment removes the options for accounting for the liability, and requires that the liabilities arising from such plans is recognized in full with actuarial gains and losses being recognized in other comprehensive income. It also revised the method of calculating the return on plan assets. The definition of short-term benefits has been revised, meaning some annual leave entitlements may become long-term in nature with a revised measurement. Similarly the timing for recognising a provision for termination benefits has been revised, such that provisions can only be recognised when the offer cannot be withdrawn. Consequential amendments were also made to other standards via AASB 2011-10. Interpretation 20: Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine (applicable for annual reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2013) This interpretation applies to stripping costs incurred during the production phase of a surface mine. Production stripping costs are to be capitalised as part of an asset, if an entity can demonstrate that it is probable future economic benefits will be realised, the costs can be reliably measured and the entity can identify the component of an ore body for which access has been improved. This asset is to be called the “stripping activity asset”. The stripping activity asset shall be depreciated or amortised on a systematic basis, over the expected useful life of the identified component of the ore body that becomes more accessible as a result of the stripping activity. The units of production method shall be applied unless another method is more appropriate. (t) Critical accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are: Environmental Issues Balances disclosed in the financial statements and notes thereto are not adjusted for any pending or enacted environmental legislation, and the directors understanding thereof. At the current stage of the Group’s development and its current environmental impact the directors believe such treatment is reasonable and appropriate. Taxation Balances disclosed in the financial statements and the notes thereto related to taxation are based on the best estimates of the directors. These estimates take into account both the financial performance and position of the Group as they pertain to current income taxation legislation, and the directors understanding thereof. No adjustment has been made for pending or future taxation legislation. The current income tax position represents that directors’ best estimate, pending an assessment by the Australian Taxation Office. Exploration expenditure Exploration and evaluation costs are expensed as they are incurred. Share based payments The Group measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by an internal valuation using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the assumptions detailed in note 22. If any of these assumptions were to change, there may be an impact on the amounts reported. 37 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 2. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the financial performance of the Group. Risk management is carried out by the full Board of Directors as the Group believes that it is crucial for all board members to be involved in this process. The Managing Director, with the assistance of senior management as required, has responsibility for identifying, assessing, treating and monitoring risks and reporting to the board on risk management. (a) Market risk (i) Foreign exchange risk The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures, primarily with respect to the Chilean Peso (“CLP”). Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities denominated in a currency that is not the entity’s functional currency and net investments in foreign operations. The Group has not formalised a foreign currency risk management policy however, it monitors its foreign currency expenditure in light of exchange rate movements. The Group’s exposure to foreign currency risk at the reporting date was as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Trade and other payables Net CLP exposure Net AUD exposure 2012 CLP 9,173,083 1,820,716 (15,103,444) (4,109,645) 2011 CLP 45,254,518 400,026 (16,169,770) 29,484,774 (8,092) 59,264 Sensitivity analysis Based on the financial instruments held at 30 June 2012, had the Australian dollar weakened/strengthened by 10% against the Chilean Peso with all other variables held constant, there would have been nil impact on the Group’s post-tax losses for the year (2011: Nil) and immaterial movements to the Group’s equity for both years presented. (ii) Price risk Given the current level of operations, the Group is not exposed to price risk. (iii) Interest rate risk The Group is exposed to movements in market interest rates on cash and cash equivalents. The Group policy is to monitor the interest rate yield curve out to six months to ensure a balance is maintained between the liquidity of cash assets and the interest rate return. The entire balance of cash and cash equivalents for the Group $2,040,132 (2011: $1,556,883) is subject to interest rate risk. The proportional mix of floating interest rates and fixed rates to a maximum of six months fluctuate during the year depending on current working capital requirements. The weighted average interest rate received on cash and cash equivalents by the Group was 3.4% (2011: 4.6%). Sensitivity analysis At 30 June 2012, if interest rates had changed by -/+ 80 basis points from the weighted average rate for the year with all other variables held constant, post-tax loss for the Group would have been $8,850 lower/higher (2011: $6,750 lower/higher) as a result of lower/higher interest income from cash and cash equivalents. (b) Credit risk The Group does not have any significant concentrations of credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk at balance date is the carrying amount (net of provision for impairment) of those assets as disclosed in the statement of financial position and notes to the financial statements. As the Group does not presently have any debtors, lending, significant stock levels or any other credit risk, a formal credit risk management policy is not maintained. Credit risk related to balances with banks by ensuring surplus funds are only invested with counterparties with a Standard & Poor’s rating of at least AA-, with material cash balances retained in AUD or USD. 38 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT (cont’d) 2. (c) Liquidity risk The Group manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and ensuring sufficient cash and marketable securities are available to meet the current and future commitments of the Group. Due to the nature of the Group’s activities, being mineral exploration, the Group does not have ready access to credit facilities, with the primary source of funding being equity raisings. The Board of Directors constantly monitor the state of equity markets in conjunction with the Group’s current and future funding requirements, with a view to initiating appropriate capital raisings as required. The financial liabilities of the Group are confined to trade and other payables as disclosed in the Statement of financial position. All trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and due within 12 months of the reporting date. (d) Fair value estimation The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities must be estimated for recognition and measurement or for disclosure purposes. All financial assets and financial liabilities of the Group at the balance date are recorded at amounts approximating their carrying amount. The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market price used for financial assets held by the Group is the current bid price. The carrying value less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. 3. OPERATING SEGMENTS Identification of reportable segments The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports that are reviewed and used by the Board of Directors (chief operating decision makers) in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources. Reportable segments disclosed are based on aggregating operating segments where the segments are considered to have similar economic characteristics. For management purposes, the Group has identified only one reportable segment as exploration activities undertaken in Chile. This segment includes activities associated with the determination and assessment of the existence of commercial economic reserves, from the Group’s mineral assets in this geographic location. Basis of accounting for purposes of reporting by operating segments Accounting policies adopted Unless stated otherwise, all amounts reported to the Board of Directors as the chief decision maker with respect to operating segments are determined in accordance with accounting policies that are consistent to those adopted in the annual financial statements of the Group. Inter-segment transactions An internally determined transfer price is set for all inter-entity sales. This price is re-set quarterly and is based on what would be realised in the event the sale was made to an external party at arm’s-length. All such transactions are eliminated on consolidation for the Group’s financial statements. Inter-segment loans payable and receivable are initially recognised at the consideration received net of transaction costs. If inter-segment loans receivable and payable are not on commercial terms, these are not adjusted to fair value based on market interest rates. This policy represents a departure from that applied to the statutory financial statements. Segment assets Where an asset is used across multiple segments, the asset is allocated to the segment that receives the majority of economic value from the asset. In the majority of instances, segment assets are clearly identifiable on the basis of their nature and physical location. Unless indicated otherwise in the segment assets note, investments in financial assets, deferred tax assets and intangible assets have not been allocated to operating segments. Segment liabilities Liabilities are allocated to segments where there is direct nexus between the incurrence of the liability and the operations of the segment. Borrowings and tax liabilities are generally considered to relate to the Group as a whole and are not allocated. Segment liabilities include trade and other payables and certain direct borrowings. Unallocated items The following items of revenue, expense, assets and liabilities are not allocated to operating segments as they are not considered part of the core operations of the segment:  Head office and other administration costs. 39 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 3. SEGMENT INFORMATION (cont’d) Chile exploration segment Segment revenue Reconciliation of segment revenue to total revenue before tax: Corporate interest revenue Other revenue Total revenue Segment results Reconciliation of segment result to net loss before tax: Depreciation expense Salaries and employee benefits expense Share based payments expense Other corporate and administration expenses Net loss before tax Segment operating assets Reconciliation of segment operating assets to total assets: Other corporate and administration assets Total assets Segment operating liabilities Reconciliation of segment operating liabilities to total liabilities: Inter-segment eliminations Other corporate and administration liabilities Total liabilities 4. REVENUE From continuing operations Other revenue Interest Foreign exchange gains 5. EXPENSES Loss before income tax includes the following specific expenses: Defined contribution superannuation expense Impairment expense - trade and other receivables 40 2012 $ - 37,942 10,115 48,057 2011 $ - 38,977 - 38,977 (3,448,550) (1,597,138) (4,142) (440,658) (864,238) (359,943) (1,732) (330,944) (178,362) (389,441) (5,117,531) (2,497,617) 21,647 91,766 2,049,940 2,071,587 1,485,750 1,577,516 4,197,645 2,815,907 (4,167,906) 282,498 312,237 (2,783,406) 78,282 110,783 37,942 10,115 48,057 38,977 - 38,977 21,981 151,084 20,356 137,426 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 6. INCOME TAX (a) Income tax expense Current tax Deferred tax 2012 $ 2011 $ - - - - - - (b) Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax payable Loss from continuing operations before income tax expense (5,117,531) (2,497,617) Prima facie tax benefit at the Australian tax rate of 30% Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible (taxable) in calculating taxable income: Share-based payments Expenses incurred in deriving non-assessable non-exempt income Sundry items Movements in unrecognised temporary differences Tax effect of current year tax losses for which no deferred tax asset has been recognised Income tax expense (c) Unrecognised temporary differences Deferred Tax Assets (at 30%) On Income Tax Account Capital raising costs Provisions for impairment Other Carry forward tax losses Deferred Tax Liabilities (at 30%) Other 7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash at bank and in hand Short-term deposits Cash and cash equivalents (1,535,259) (749,285) 252,056 626,141 7,695 (649,367) 1,327 648,040 - 65,461 123,043 18,826 2,448,888 2,656,218 53,509 - 236 (695,540) (549) 696,089 - 83,363 79,359 13,500 1,940,659 2,116,881 4,498 - 540,132 1,500,000 2,040,132 493,773 1,063,110 1,556,883 Cash at bank and in hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates. Short-term deposits are made for varying periods of between one day and three months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates. 41 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 8. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES Government taxes receivable Provision for impairment (note (a)) Other receivables 2012 $ 410,781 (410,143) 17,911 18,549 2011 $ 264,531 (264,531) 7,437 7,437 (a) Impaired receivables As at 30 June 2012 the GTS receivable from the Group’s operations in Chile (tax similar to Australia’s GST), with a nominal value of $410,143 (2011: $264,531), has been provided for in full. The GTS may only be recoverable once the Group’s operations are producing revenue in Chile. Movements in the provision for impairment of receivables are as follows: Balance at the beginning of the year Exchange differences Provision for impairment recognised during the year 264,531 (5,472) 151,084 410,143 147,113 (20,008) 137,426 264,531 9. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Plant and equipment Cost Accumulated depreciation Net book amount Plant and equipment Opening net book amount Exchange differences Additions Depreciation charge Closing net book amount 10. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES Trade payables Other payables and accruals 11. ISSUED CAPITAL (a) Share capital 27,275 (14,369) 12,906 13,196 (184) 4,036 (4,142) 12,906 169,697 142,540 312,237 23,413 (10,217) 13,196 892 (407) 14,443 (1,732) 13,196 34,067 76,716 110,783 2012 2011 Notes Number of shares $ Number of shares $ Ordinary shares fully paid 11(b), 11(d) 121,783,379 12,371,942 77,408,477 7,849,148 (b) Other equity securities Value of conversion rights – convertible notes 11(f) 25,633 - Total issued capital 12,397,575 7,849,148 42 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 11. ISSUED CAPITAL (cont’d) (c) Movements in ordinary share capital Beginning of the financial year Issued during the year:  Issued for cash at 5 cents per share  Issued as consideration for tenement acquisitions  Issued on conversion of convertible notes at 10 cents per share  Issued for cash at 10 cents per share  Issued on exercise of 10 cent options  Issued for cash at 15 cents per share  Issued for cash at 20 cents per share Less: Transaction costs End of the financial year (d) Movements in options on issue Beginning of the financial year Issued during the year:  Exercisable at 10 cents, on or before 30 Sep 2012  Exercisable at 12 cents, on or before 1 Mar 2013  Exercisable at 15 cents, on or before 1 Mar 2014  Exercisable at 20 cents, on or before 1 Mar 2015  Exercisable at 22 cents, on or before 31 Dec 2014  Exercisable at 31 cents, on or before 30 Nov 2013 Exercised/expired during the year:  Exercisable at 20 cents, on or before 15 May 2012  Exercisable at 10 cents, on or before 30 Jun 2011 End of the financial year 2012 2011 Number of shares $ Number of shares $ 77,408,477 7,849,148 34,917,510 4,268,799 - 510,000 - 56,100 28,215,967 550,000 1,410,798 91,000 5,000,000 35,531,569 - 3,333,333 - - 121,783,379 500,000 3,541,157 - 500,000 - (74,463) 12,371,942 - - 4,500,000 - 9,225,000 - 77,408,477 - - 450,000 - 1,845,000 (216,449) 7,849,148 Number of options 2011 2012 12,900,000 14,400,000 - 13,510,596 13,510,596 13,510,596 9,500,000 - 600,000 - - - - 2,400,000 (9,250,000) - 53,681,788 - (4,500,000) 12,900,000 (e) Ordinary shares Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held. On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote. Ordinary shares have no par value and the Company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital. (f) Other equity securities The amount shown for other equity securities is the value of the conversion rights relating to the convertible notes that were issued, and then converted, during the current reporting period. The Group issued five convertible notes with a face value of $100,000 each during the year to Investmet Ltd, a company of which Mr Delaney is deemed an associate, with a nil interest rate. The notes are convertible into ordinary shares of the Company, at the option of the holder, or repayable on 30 April 2012. The conversion rate is 1 million shares for each note held, plus a free attaching option, subject to prior shareholder approval, or 1.67 million shares for each note held if shareholder approval is not obtained. Shareholder approval was obtained at the general meeting held on 21 March 2012, and the notes were subsequently converted at the rate of 1 million shares for each note held, with the shares issued on 12 April 2012. Details of amounts recognised in the financial statements are as follows: 43 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 11. ISSUED CAPITAL (cont’d) Face value of note issued Other equity securities – value of conversion rights (note 11(a)) Interest expense* Share capital recognised on conversion of notes 2012 $ 500,000 (25,633) 474,367 25,633 500,000 2011 $ - - - - - *Interest expense is calculated by applying the effective interest rate of 20% to the liability component. (g) Capital risk management The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard their ability to continue as a going concern, so that they may continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. Due to the nature of the Group’s activities, being mineral exploration, the Group does not have ready access to credit facilities, with the primary source of funding being equity raisings. Therefore, the focus of the Group’s capital risk management is the current working capital position against the requirements of the Group to meet exploration programmes and corporate overheads. The Group’s strategy is to ensure appropriate liquidity is maintained to meet anticipated operating requirements, with a view to initiating appropriate capital raisings as required. The working capital position of the Group at 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2012 is as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Trade and other payables Working capital position 12. RESERVES AND ACCUMULATED LOSSES (a) Reserves Foreign currency translation reserve Share-based payments reserve Movements: Foreign currency translation reserve Balance at beginning of year Currency translation differences arising during the year Balance at end of year Share-based payments reserve Balance at beginning of year Options issued to employees and contractors Balance at end of year 2,040,132 18,549 (312,237) 1,746,444 76,556 1,139,075 1,215,631 79,073 (2,517) 76,556 274,837 864,238 1,139,075 1,556,883 7,437 (110,783) 1,453,537 79,073 274,837 353,910 30,781 48,292 79,073 96,475 178,362 274,837 (b) Nature and purpose of reserves (i) Foreign currency translation reserve Exchange differences arising on translation of the foreign controlled entities are taken to the foreign currency translation reserve, as described in note 1(d). The reserve is recognised in profit and loss when the net investment is disposed of. (ii) Share-based payments reserve The share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options issued. 44 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 13. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES (a) Key management personnel compensation Short-term benefits Post-employment benefits Other long-term benefits Termination benefits Share-based payments 2012 $ 306,236 21,981 - - 606,637 934,854 2011 $ 273,250 21,575 - - 105,102 399,927 Detailed remuneration disclosures are provided in the remuneration report on pages 15 and 16. (b) Equity instrument disclosures relating to key management personnel (i) Options provided as remuneration and shares issued on exercise of such options Details of options provided as remuneration and shares issued on the exercise of such options, together with terms and conditions of the options, can be found in the remuneration report on page 15. (ii) Option holdings The numbers of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each director of Genesis Minerals Limited and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below: 2012 Balance at start of the year Granted as compensation Exercised Other changes Balance at end of the year Vested and exercisable Unvested Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited Michael Haynes 1,500,000 Michael Fowler 6,500,000 Damian Delaney - Graeme Smith 900,000 500,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 - - - - - (1,000,000) (4,918,748) 345,003 (900,000)(1) 1,000,000 3,581,252 4,345,003 - 750,000 2,831,252 4,345,003 - 250,000 750,000 - - (1) Mr Smith’s holding at the date of his resignation, 21 March 2012. 2011 Balance at start of the year Granted as compensation Exercised Other changes Balance at end of the year Vested and exercisable Unvested Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited 1,000,000 Michael Haynes 5,000,000 Michael Fowler 500,000 Graeme Smith 500,000 1,500,000 400,000 - - - - - - 1,500,000 6,500,000 900,000 1,250,000 5,750,000 700,000 250,000 750,000 200,000 45 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 13. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES (cont’d) (iii) Share holdings The numbers of shares in the Company held during the financial year by each director of Genesis Minerals Limited and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below. There were no shares granted during the reporting period as compensation. 2012 Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited Ordinary shares Michael Haynes Michael Fowler Damian Delaney Graeme Smith (1) Mr Smith’s holding at the date of his resignation, 21 March 2012. 2011 Directors of Genesis Minerals Limited Ordinary shares Michael Haynes Michael Fowler Graeme Smith (c) Loans to key management personnel There were no loans to key management personnel during the year. 14. REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS Received during the year on the exercise of options Balance at start of the year Other changes during the year Balance at end of the year 993,334 3,166,667 - 100,001 - - - - - 81,250 345,000 (100,001)(1) 993,334 3,247,917 345,000 - Received during the year on the exercise of options Other changes during the year Balance at end of the year - - - 333,334 1,166,667 40,001 993,334 3,166,667 100,001 Balance at start of the year 660,000 2,000,000 60,000 During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related practices and non-related audit firms: 2012 $ 2011 $ Audit services Bentleys - audit and review of financial reports Total remuneration for audit services 15. CONTINGENCIES There are no contingent liabilities or contingent assets of the Group at balance date. 16. COMMITMENTS 26,100 26,100 25,650 25,650 Exploration commitments The Group has certain commitments to meet minimum expenditure requirements on the mineral exploration assets it has an interest in. Outstanding exploration commitments are as follows: within one year later than one year but not later than five years 2,200,000 - 2,200,000 2,200,000 - 2,200,000 46 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (a) Parent entity The ultimate parent entity within the Group is Genesis Minerals Limited. (b) Subsidiaries Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 18. (c) Key management personnel Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 13. (d) Loans to related parties Genesis Minerals Limited has provided an unsecured, interest free loan to its wholly owned subsidiary, Genesis Minerals (Chile) S.A., totalling $4,167,906 (2011: $2,783,406) at 30 June 2012. An impairment assessment is undertaken each financial year by examining the financial position of the subsidiary and the market in which the subsidiary operates to determine whether there is objective evidence that the subsidiary is impaired. When such objective evidence exists, the Company recognises an allowance for the impairment loss. The loan has been fully provided for. 18. SUBSIDIARIES The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting policy described in note 1(b): Name Country of Incorporation Equity Holding(1) Class of Shares Genesis Minerals (Chile) S.A. Chile Ordinary (1) The proportion of ownership interest is equal to the proportion of voting power held. 19. EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE 2012 % 100 2011 % 100 No matters or circumstances have arisen since the end of the financial year which significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group in future financial years. 20. CASH FLOW INFORMATION (a) Reconciliation of net loss after income tax to net cash outflow from operating activities Net loss for the year Non-Cash Items Depreciation of non-current assets Share based payments expense Shares issued in satisfaction of exploration expenses Accretion expense on convertible notes Net exchange differences Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase of controlled entities Decrease/(increase) in trade and other receivables (Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables Net cash outflow from operating activities 2012 $ 2011 $ (5,117,531) (2,497,617) 4,142 864,238 56,100 25,633 - 1,732 269,362 - - 49,294 (11,112) 201,454 (3,977,076) 1,129 39,340 (2,136,760) (b) Non-cash investing and financing activities There were no non-cash investing and financing activities during either the 2012 or 2011 financial years. 47 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 21. LOSS PER SHARE (a) Reconciliation of earnings used in calculating loss per share Loss attributable to the owners of the Company used in calculating basic and diluted loss per share (b) Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating basic and diluted loss per share 22. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS 2012 $ 2011 $ (5,117,531) (2,497,617) Number of shares Number of shares 86,601,519 59,519,619 (a) Employees and contractors options The Group provides benefits to employees (including directors) and contractors of the Group in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby options to acquire ordinary shares are issued as an incentive to improve employee and shareholder goal congruence. The exercise price of the options granted ranges from 12 to 31 cents with expiry dates ranging from 28 February 2013 to 31 December 2014. Options granted carry no dividend or voting rights. When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary share of the Company with full dividend and voting rights. Set out below are summaries of the options granted: Outstanding at the beginning of the year Granted Forfeited/cancelled Exercised Expired Outstanding at year-end Exercisable at year-end 2012 2011 Weighted average exercise price cents 25.5 22.0 - - - 23.0 22.2 Weighted average exercise price cents 19.4 26.8 - - - 25.5 22.8 Number of options 650,000 3,000,000 - - - 3,650,000 2,450,000 Number of options 3,650,000 9,500,000 - - - 13,150,000 11,950,000 The weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end of the financial year was 2.12 years (2011: 2.12), with exercise prices ranging from 12 to 31 cents. The weighted average fair value of the options granted during the year was 8.6 cents (2011: 7.6). The price was calculated by using the Black-Scholes European Option Pricing Model applying the following inputs: 2012 2011 Weighted average exercise price (cents) Weighted average life of the option (years) Weighted average underlying share price (cents) Expected share price volatility Risk free interest rate Historical volatility has been used as the basis for determining expected share price volatility as it assumed that this is indicative of future trends, which may not eventuate. The life of the options is based on historical exercise patterns, which may not eventuate in the future. 22.0 2.7 14.4 113.9% 3.4% 26.8 2.8 18.6 72.1% 4.7% (b) Shares issued to suppliers During the financial year ended 30 June 2012 a total of 510,000 ordinary shares were issued at a deemed cost of $56,100 as consideration per tenement acquisition agreements and have been included as part of ‘Exploration expenses’ on the statement of comprehensive income. During the financial year ended 30 June 2011 a total of 550,000 ordinary shares were issued at a deemed cost of $91,000 as consideration per tenement acquisition agreements and have been included as part of ‘Exploration expenses’ on the statement of comprehensive income. 48 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements continued 30 JUNE 2012 22. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS (cont’d) 2012 $ 2011 $ (c) Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the year were as follows: Options issued to employees as part of share-based payment expenses Shares issued to suppliers as part of exploration expenses 864,238 56,100 920,338 178,362 91,000 269,362 23. PARENT ENTITY INFORMATION The following information relates to the parent entity, Genesis Minerals Limited, at 30 June 2012. The information presented here has been prepared using accounting policies consistent with those presented in Note 1. Current assets Non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Total liabilities Issued capital Share-based payments reserve Accumulated losses Total equity Loss for the year Total comprehensive loss for the year 2,037,034 2,777 2,039,811 282,498 282,498 12,397,575 1,139,075 (11,779,337) 1,757,313 (5,054,644) (5,054,644) 1,472,555 5,019 1,477,574 78,282 78,282 7,849,148 274,837 (6,724,693) 1,399,292 (2,510,287) (2,510,287) The parent entity did not have any contingent liabilities, or any contractual commitments for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment, as at 30 June 2011 or 30 June 2012. 49 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities Directors' Declaration In the directors’ opinion: (a) the financial statements and notes set out on pages 25 to 49 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: (i) complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2012 and of its performance for the financial year ended on that date; (ii) (b) (c) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Group will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable; and a statement that the attached financial statements are in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards has been included in the notes to the financial statements. The directors have been given the declarations by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer required by section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001. This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors. Michael Fowler Managing Director Perth, 24 September 2012 50 We have audited the accompanying financial report of Genesis Minerals Limited (“the Company”) and Controlled Entities (“the Consolidated Entity”), which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2012, and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors’ declaration of the Company and the Consolidated Entity, comprising the Company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year. The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 1, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standards AASB 101: Presentation of Financial Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001. In our opinion: a. The financial report of Genesis Minerals Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: i. giving a true and fair view of the Consolidated Entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2012 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and ii. complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; b. The financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1. Without qualifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 1(a)(v) in the financial report which indicates that the company incurred a net loss of $5,117,531 during the year ended 30 June 2012. This condition, along with other matters as set forth in Note 1(a)(v), indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the ability of the company to continue as a going concern and whether it will realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the financial report. We have audited the Remuneration Report included in directors’ report of the year ended 30 June 2012. The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Genesis Minerals Limited for the year ended 30 June 2012, complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. BENTLEYS Chartered Accountants RANKO MATIC CA Director DATED at PERTH this 24th day of September 2012 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities ASX Additional Information Additional information required by Australian Stock Exchange Ltd and not shown elsewhere in this report is as follows. The information is current as at 20 September 2012. (a) Distribution of equity securities Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding: 1 1,001 5,001 10,001 100,001 - - - - 1,000 5,000 10,000 100,000 and over The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of shares are: (b) Twenty largest shareholders The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted ordinary shares are: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 INVESTMET LIMITED WYLLIE GROUP PTY LTD ARGONAUT EQUITY PARTNERS PTY LIMITED WESTORIA RESOURCE INVESTMENTS LTD MR DENIS JOHN REYNOLDS PERSHING AUSTRALIA NOMINEES PTY LTD HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED MR MICHAEL JOHN FOWLER + MRS FIONA LEE FOWLER DGALI INVESTMENTS PTY LTD MR MICHAEL GEORGE FOTIOS ARGONAUT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD STATELINE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 1215 CAPITAL PTY LTD CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED GREENSLADE HOLDINGS PTY LTD MR GEOFFREY NORMAN BARNESBY-JOHNSON + MS CATHERINE JANE HALVORSEN MS BETTY JEANETTE MOORE + MR PHILIP COLIN HAMMOND MR PHILIP COLIN HAMMOND + MS BETTY JEANETTE MOORE MULLOWAY PTY LTD MRS CAMILLE DIANNE BROOKS Ordinary shares Number of holders Number of shares 14 28 54 277 157 530 52 1,576 96,291 481,096 11,122,687 110,081,729 121,783,379 Listed ordinary shares Number of shares 19,395,142 5,992,501 4,428,751 4,050,000 4,000,000 3,935,416 3,615,289 2,516,667 2,437,501 2,132,000 1,875,001 1,350,000 1,148,622 1,125,000 1,125,000 1,125,000 1,050,000 1,000,000 999,790 940,000 Percentage of ordinary shares 15.93 4.92 3.64 3.33 3.28 3.23 2.97 2.07 2.00 1.75 1.54 1.11 0.94 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.86 0.82 0.82 0.77 64,241,680 52.75 (c) Substantial shareholders The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B of the Corporations Act 2001 are: Investmet Ltd (d) Voting rights All ordinary shares (whether fully paid or not) carry one vote per share without restriction. 53 Number of Shares 19,395,142 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities ASX Additional Information continued (e) Unquoted Securities As at 20 September 2012, the Company has a total of unlisted options as follows: Number of Options Number of Holders Exercise Price 500,000 150,000 600,000 2,400,000 9,500,000 13,510,596 13,510,596 13,510,596 53,681,788 1 1 2 3 5 207 207 207 635 Unlisted Option holder holding greater than 20% of a class of unlisted options Unlisted options exercisable at $0.20 expiring on 28/02/2013 Mr S Mandujano Unlisted options exercisable at $0.20 expiring on 23/08/2013 Mr G Winnett Unlisted options exercisable at $0.10 expiring on 30/09/2012 Mr S Mandujano Mr P Olate Unlisted options exercisable at $0.31 expiring on 30/11/2013 Mr M Fowler Mr M Haynes Unlisted options exercisable at $0.20 expiring on 31/12/2014 Mr D Delaney Mr M Fowler Mr M Fotios Unlisted options exercisable at $0.12 expiring on 01/03/2013 Investmet Pty Ltd Unlisted options exercisable at $0.15 expiring on 01/03/2014 Investmet Pty Ltd Unlisted options exercisable at $0.20 expiring on 01/03/2014 Investmet Pty Ltd $0.20 $0.20 $0.10 $0.31 $0.22 $0.12 $0.15 $0.20 No of Options Held 500,000 No of Options Held 150,000 No of Options Held 400,000 200,000 No of Options Held 1,500,000 500,000 No of Options Held 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 No of Options Held 6,458,381 No of Options Held 6,458,381 No of Options Held 6,458,381 Expiry Date 28/02/2013 23/08/2013 30/09/2012 30/11/2013 31/12/2014 01/03/2013 01/03/2014 01/03/2015 % Held 100% % Held 100% % Held 67% 33% % Held 63% 21% % Held 42% 21% 21% % Held 48% % Held 48% % Held 48% 54 Genesis Minerals Limited and controlled entities ASX Additional Information continued (f) Schedule of interests in mining tenements Project Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Dinamarquesa Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Cerro Verde Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Los Openas Poncha Poncha Country Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Chile Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Argentina Tenement ID Coya 1/60 Coya 61/120 Dinamarquesa Idolatria Gold Copper 1 al 20 Lastenia Segunda India 1/9 Lastenia O Guias D India Chica Copiapina Hortensia AGUA AMARILLA VISCACHA LINDEROS SERENA COQUIMBANA SIERRALTA MERCEDITAS SANTA FE PIMIENTA 1 al 2 TIFUCA VISCACHITA 2/7 VISCACHITA II MEJICANA ESPINA DE UNA FLOR JORGE IGNACIO 1-4 MARIA INES NUEVA ESPERANZA NUEVA FARELLON 1-3 SAN JOSE BUENOS AIRES RINCON 3-5 GUIAS VIRGEN 7 1 - 60 SARA I/II CARMEN CATALINA 1 1-220 CATALINA 2 1-278 CATALINA 3 1-149 CATALINA 4 1-60 CATALINA 5 1-60 CATALINA 6 1-40 CATALINA 7 1-40 CATALINA 8 1-15 CATALINA 9 CATALINA 10 CATALINA 11 CATALINA 12 CATALINA 13 CATALINA 14 CATALINA 15 CATALINA 16 Gladys Natalia San Antonio Nancy Noemi San Judas Tadeo Lila Patrocino San Jose Vega Redonda Melinda Colanguil 55 National Roll Number 031022031-0 031022032-9 031020677-6 031020676-8 031022817-6 031022341-7 031021240-7 031020601-6 031021386-1 031020697-0 031020697-0 032010397-5 032011066-1 032011094-7 032011205-2 032010394-0 032011206-0 032011546-9 032011220-6 032011474-8 032010262-6 032010248-0 032012081-0 032011780-1 032010585-4 032011113-7 032011753-4 032010524-2 032011024-6 032010459-9 032010124-7 032011760-7 032010320-7 032016975-5 032030073-8 032010935-3 032017287-K 032017289-6 032017288-8 032018779-6 032018780-K 032018781-8 032018782-6 032018783-4 03201E263-0 03201E264-9 03201E265-7 03201E266-5 03201E267-3 03201E268-1 03201E269-K 03201E284-3 194.459-A-81 295.240-E-89 194.265-H-81 14-BIS-H-46 184.171-H-82 306.498-P-88 306.499-P-88 1124.354-H-07 306.492-H-88 1249-T-05 1467-M-05 0483-R-95 Status Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Granted Pending Pending Pending Granted Pending Pending Pending Pending Pending Granted Granted Granted Equity RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% RTE 100% 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above