2012 Annual Report
George Weston Limited
2012 Annual Report
Financial Highlights 1 Report to Shareholders 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis 4 Financial Results 59
Three Year Summary 126 Glossary 130 Corporate Directory 132 Shareholder and Corporate Information 133
This Annual Report contains forward-looking information. See Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 5 of this Annual Report
for a discussion of material factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the conclusions, forecasts and projections
herein and of the material factors, estimates, beliefs and assumptions that were applied in presenting the conclusions, forecasts and
projections presented herein. This Annual Report must be read in conjunction with George Weston Limited's filings with securities
regulators made from time to time, all of which can be found at www.sedar.com.
Financial Highlights(2)
$
$
2012
32,742
1,392
1,563
2,399
417
486
726
As at or for the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Consolidated Operating Results
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Net interest expense and other financing charges(3)
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company
Net earnings
Consolidated Financial Position and Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits
Adjusted debt(1)
Free cash flow(1)
Cash flows from operating activities
Fixed asset purchases
Consolidated per Common Share ($)
Basic net earnings
Adjusted basic net earnings(1)
Consolidated Financial Measures and Ratios
Sales growth
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Adjusted debt(1) to adjusted EBITDA(1)
Interest coverage(1)
Return on average net assets(1)
Return on average common shareholders' equity attributable
1.1%
4.8%
7.3%
2.3x
3.3x
10.7%
4,075
5,584
946
1,852
1,110
3.45
4.46
$
$
$
$
2011
32,376
1,609
1,700
2,459
366
635
919
4,101
5,536
1,051
1,974
1,027
4.58
4.86
1.7%
5.3%
7.6%
2.3x
4.4x
12.8%
to shareholders of the Company
Reportable Operating Segments
Weston Foods
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Return on average net assets(1)
Loblaw
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Return on average net assets(1)
9.3%
13.1%
$
$
$
$
1,765
228
275
15.6%
24.9%
31,604
1,188
1,288
4.1%
9.8%
1,772
208
265
15.0%
24.5%
31,250
1,376
1,435
4.6%
11.7%
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2) For financial definitions and ratios refer to the Glossary beginning on page 130.
(3) 2012 included a non-cash charge of $35 (2011 – non-cash income of $18) related to the fair value adjustment of the forward sale
agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares (see note 5 to the consolidated financial statements).
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 1
Report to Shareholders(3)
2012 was a year of significant accomplishments for George Weston Limited. Weston Foods delivered
satisfactory operating results while Loblaw Companies Limited (“Loblaw”) delivered financial
performance in line with expectations as it made progress against its priorities.
In 2012, the Company continued to focus on long term value creation for shareholders. This included
the $0.02 increase in the quarterly common share dividend and Loblaw's announcement that it intends
to create one of Canada's largest real estate investment trusts.
The Company's 2012 adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1) decreased to $4.46 compared to
$4.86 in 2011, primarily due to incremental investments by Loblaw in the customer proposition and the
information technology (“IT”) systems implementation. This decrease was partially offset by an
improvement in the operating performance of Weston Foods.
Sales increased 1.1% to $32.7 billion from $32.4 billion in 2011. Adjusted operating income(1) was
$1,563 million compared to $1,700 million in 2011. The Company's adjusted operating margin(1) was
4.8% in 2012 compared to 5.3% in 2011.
The Weston Foods operating segment achieved satisfactory results despite soft sales due to a difficult
sales environment. Weston Foods sales declined marginally by 0.4% compared to 2011 and was
negatively impacted by a decline in volume, including the loss of certain frozen distributed products
that Weston Foods distributed on behalf of certain customers. Sales were positively impacted by
pricing across key product categories and foreign currency translation. The introduction of new
products such as Country Harvest Cranberry Muesli and Flax and Quinoa breads, D'Italiano Brizzolio
rolls, Gadoua Pain de Ménage, private label gluten free bread and sweet goods, and the Flat Oven
Bakery line of international flatbreads contributed positively to sales in 2012.
Weston Foods adjusted operating income(1) in 2012 increased to $275 million from $265 million in
2011. Adjusted operating margin(1) for 2012 was 15.6% compared to 15.0% in 2011. Weston Foods
adjusted operating income(1) in 2012 was positively impacted by the benefits realized from productivity
improvements and other cost reduction initiatives and higher pricing in key product categories. These
benefits were partially offset by lower sales volumes and higher commodity and other input costs.
Loblaw sales increased 1.1% to $31.6 billion compared to $31.3 billion in 2011. The increase in sales
was driven by Loblaw's Retail segment and higher revenue from Loblaw's Financial Services segment.
Loblaw adjusted operating income(1) decreased to $1,288 million in 2012 from $1,435 million in 2011.
Adjusted operating margin(1) was 4.1% compared to 4.6% in 2011. The decrease in Loblaw's adjusted
operating income(1) compared to 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in labour and other
operating costs and the incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain(2), partially
offset by an improvement in the operating performance of Loblaw's Financial Services segment.
George Weston Limited has strategically well positioned companies with leading market positions in
food retail and baking in Canada, as well as a frozen baking manufacturing business in the United
States, a North American biscuit manufacturing business and a significant amount of cash.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2)
Incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain include IT costs, depreciation and amortization and supply chain
project costs.
(3) To be read in conjunction with Forward-Looking Statements beginning on page 5.
2 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
In 2013, Weston Foods will focus on investing in growth, marketing and innovation and Loblaw will focus on
rolling out its new IT system to distribution centres and stores, accelerating the improvements in its customer
proposition and effectively managing expenses and operating costs.
On behalf of the Board of Directors and shareholders, I thank our loyal customers for their support and our more
than 140,000 employees for their dedication and continued commitment to the Company.
[signed]
W. Galen Weston
Executive Chairman
[signed]
Paviter S. Binning
President
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 3
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Forward-Looking Statements
Overview
Vision
Operating and Financial Strategies
Key Financial Performance Indicators
Overall Financial Performance
6.1 Consolidated Results of Operations
6.2 Selected Annual Information
Results of Reportable Operating Segments
7.1 Weston Foods Operating Results
7.2 Loblaw Operating Results
Liquidity and Capital Resources
8.1 Major Cash Flow Components
8.2 Sources of Liquidity
8.3 Capital Structure
8.4 Financial Derivative Instruments
8.5 Contractual Obligations
8.6 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other Business Matters
9.
10. Quarterly Results of Operations
10.1 Quarterly Financial Information
10.2 Fourth Quarter Results
11. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
12.
13. Enterprise Risks and Risk Management
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
13.1 Operating Risks and Risk Management
13.2 Financial Risks and Risk Management
14. Related Party Transactions
15. Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
16. Accounting Standards Implemented in 2012
17. Future Accounting Standards
18. Outlook
19. Non-GAAP Financial Measures
20. Additional Information
4 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
5
6
6
7
8
9
9
13
15
15
17
19
19
21
23
25
26
27
27
28
28
29
35
36
36
37
44
46
47
48
49
50
51
58
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) for George Weston Limited (“GWL”) and its
subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated
financial statements and the accompanying notes on pages 59 to 125 of this Annual Report. The Company's
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year ended December 31, 2012 are
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS” or “GAAP”). The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and other entities that the Company controls and are
reported in Canadian dollars.
The information in this MD&A is current to February 27, 2013, unless otherwise noted. A Glossary of terms and
ratios used throughout this Annual Report can be found beginning on page 130.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
1.
This Annual Report, including this MD&A, contains forward-looking statements about the Company's objectives,
plans, goals, aspirations, strategies, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, performance, prospects
and opportunities. Specific statements with respect to anticipated future results are included in Section 18,
“Outlook” and future plans are included in Section 3, “Vision” and Section 4, “Operating and Financial
Strategies”. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”,
“foresee”, “could”, “estimate”, “goal”, “intend”, “plan”, “seek”, “strive”, “will”, “may” and “should” and similar
expressions, as they relate to the Company and its management.
Forward-looking statements reflect the Company's current estimates, beliefs and assumptions, which are based
on management's perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well
as other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. The Company's expectation of operating and
financial performance in 2013 is based on certain assumptions including assumptions about revenue growth,
anticipated cost savings and operating efficiencies, no unanticipated changes in the effective income tax rates,
no unexpected adverse events or costs related to Loblaw Companies Limited's (“Loblaw”) investments in
information technology (“IT”) and supply chain, and no significant unanticipated increase in the price of
commodities and other input costs at Weston Foods that it will not be able to offset. The Company's estimates,
beliefs and assumptions are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other
uncertainties and contingencies regarding future events and as such, are subject to change. The Company can
give no assurance that such estimates, beliefs and assumptions will prove to be correct.
Numerous risks and uncertainties could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from the
estimates, beliefs and assumptions expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements, including, but not
limited to:
•
failure to realize anticipated results, including revenue growth, anticipated cost savings or operating
efficiencies from the Company's major initiatives, including those from restructuring;
failure to realize benefits from investments in the Company's IT systems, including the Company's systems
implementation, or unanticipated results from these initiatives;
•
the inability of the Company's IT infrastructure to support the requirements of the Company's business;
• unanticipated results associated with the Company's strategic initiatives and the impact of acquisitions or
•
dispositions of businesses on the Company's future revenues and earnings;
• heightened competition, whether from current competitors or new entrants to the marketplace;
•
changes in economic conditions including the rate of inflation or deflation, changes in interest and foreign
currency exchange rates and changes in derivative and commodity prices;
• public health events;
•
•
risks associated with product defects, food safety and product handling;
failure to achieve desired results in labour negotiations, including the terms of future collective bargaining
agreements which could lead to work stoppages;
the inability of the Company to manage inventory to minimize the impact of obsolete or excess inventory
and to control shrink;
•
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 5
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
•
•
•
•
•
•
the impact of potential environmental liabilities;
failure to respond to changes in consumer tastes and buying patterns;
reliance on the performance and retention of third-party service providers including those associated with
the Company's supply chain and apparel business;
supply and quality control issues with vendors;
changes to the regulation of generic prescription drug prices and the reduction of reimbursement under
public drug benefit plans and the elimination or reduction of professional allowances paid by drug
manufacturers;
changes in the Company's income, commodity, other tax and regulatory liabilities including changes in tax
laws, regulations or future assessments;
•
• any requirement of the Company to make contributions to its registered funded defined benefit pension
plans or the multi-employer pension plans (“MEPP”) in which it participates in excess of those currently
contemplated;
the risk that the Company would experience a financial loss if its counterparties fail to meet their obligations
in accordance with the terms and conditions of their contracts with the Company;
the inability of Loblaw to collect on its credit card receivables; and
failure to execute the initial public offering (“IPO”) of Loblaw's proposed Real Estate Investment Trust
(“REIT”).
•
•
This is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect the Company's forward-looking statements. Other
risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company presently believes are not
material could also cause actual results or events to differ materially from those expressed in its forward-looking
statements. Additional risks and uncertainties are discussed in the Company's materials filed with the Canadian
securities regulatory authorities from time to time, including the Enterprise Risks and Risk Management section
of this MD&A. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
reflect the Company's expectations only as of the date of this Annual Report. Except as required by law, the
Company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
OVERVIEW
2.
George Weston Limited is a Canadian public company, founded in 1882, engaged in food processing and
distribution. The Company has two reportable operating segments: Loblaw and Weston Foods, and holds cash
and short term investments. The Loblaw operating segment, which is operated by Loblaw Companies Limited
and its subsidiaries, is Canada's largest food retailer and a leading provider of drugstore, general merchandise
and financial products and services. The Weston Foods operating segment is a leading fresh and frozen baking
company in Canada and operates a frozen baking manufacturing business in the United States (“U.S.”) and a
North American biscuit manufacturing business.
VISION
3.
The Company's vision is to achieve long term, stable growth in its operating segments through customer focus
and innovation. The Company is committed to making prudent capital investments while maintaining a strong
balance sheet with the goal of providing sustainable returns to its shareholders over the long term through a
combination of common share price appreciation and dividends.
The Company believes that to be successful over the long term, it must deliver on what its customers and
consumers want today and in the future. The Company encourages innovation in order to provide consumers
with new products and convenient services at competitive prices that meet consumers' everyday household
needs.
Looking ahead, the Company plans to achieve these goals by focusing on its long term operating and financial
strategies as discussed below.
6 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL STRATEGIES
4.
To be successful in achieving its vision, the Company employs various operating and financial strategies. The
Company engages in strategic acquisitions and dispositions when it is in the best long term interests of its
shareholders to do so.
Each of the Company's two reportable operating segments has its own risk profile and operating risk
management strategies.
Weston Foods' mission is to be a leading North American bakery company by participating across profitable
segments of the bakery market, introducing innovative products and maintaining its highly effective cost
management culture.
This will be achieved by focusing on innovation, cost management and continuous process improvements while
exceeding customer and consumer expectations through superior service and product quality.
Weston Foods' long term operating strategies include:
• maintaining customer alignment;
•
focusing on brand development including introducing innovative new products to meet the taste, nutritional
and dietary needs of consumers;
• optimizing plant and distribution networks including capital investment to strategically position facilities to
•
support growth and enhance quality, productivity and efficiencies;
realizing ongoing cost reduction initiatives with the objective of ensuring a low cost operating structure and
economies of scale;
completing strategic acquisitions and developing relationships to broaden market penetration and expand
geographic presence; and
• building leadership talent.
•
Loblaw’s mission is to be Canada’s best food, health and home retailer by exceeding customer expectations
through innovative products at great prices. As one of the country’s leading retailers reaching 14 million
consumers each week, Loblaw is uniquely positioned to deliver on its purpose – Live Life Well – and to provide
Canadians with products, services, value and experience to enrich their lives. Loblaw delivers on this purpose
through its strategy to strengthen its competitive position with a winning customer proposition and efficient and
cost-effective operations fueled by growth opportunities in emerging and complementary businesses.
Loblaw is committed to providing Canadians with a wide range of products and services to meet the everyday
household demands of Canadian consumers. Loblaw is known for the quality, innovation and value of its food
offering. It offers one of Canada's strongest control brand programs, including the unique President's Choice,
no name and Joe Fresh brands. In addition, Loblaw, through its subsidiaries, makes available to consumers
President's Choice Financial services and offers the PC points loyalty program.
Key focus areas for Loblaw in 2013 include launching the roll-out program to convert its network of distribution
centres and stores to the new IT system; accelerating business competitiveness with a more responsive and
proactive culture to better serve customers; and managing expenses and operating costs to return efficiencies to
customers. Plans for 2013 include:
•
integrating supply chain systems at each distribution centre to the new IT system in lock-step with store
implementations;
implementing a staggered roll-out of the new IT system to a significant number of corporate stores;
•
• exceeding customer expectations and achieving improved customer feedback scores with the right
assortment, improved customer in-store experience and competitive prices;
• offering customized assortment, compelling displays and delivering competitive value across banners
through ongoing development and implementation of strategic category reviews;
capitalizing on its established control brands across food and general merchandise;
•
• expanding the financial services business by creating in-store customer awareness and expanding product
offerings;
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 7
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
• managing costs across the business with a focus on improved shrink, inventory turns, labour and
administrative expenses to drive efficient operations and provide customers greater value;
investing to improve standards and in-store experience through renovations and strategically investing in
new square footage; and
completing the creation of a REIT by way of an IPO.
•
•
Loblaw achieved many of its goals in 2012 and expects to continue to execute on its plan to strengthen the
competitive position of its businesses in 2013.
The Company's financial strategies include:
• maintaining a strong balance sheet;
• minimizing the risks and costs of operating and financing activities; and
• maintaining liquidity and access to capital markets.
The success of these and other plans and strategies discussed in this MD&A may be affected by risks and
uncertainties, including those described in Section 13, “Enterprise Risks and Risk Management” of this MD&A.
GWL's Board of Directors (“Board”) and senior management meet at least annually to review the Company's
business strategy. The business strategy, which generally addresses a three to five year time frame, targets
specific issues in response to the Company's performance, such as growth opportunities by acquisitions,
anticipating changes in consumer needs and the competitive landscape.
The Company believes that if it successfully implements and executes the business strategy in support of its long
term operating and financial strategies, it will be well positioned to fulfill its vision of providing sustainable value
to its shareholders over the long term.
KEY FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
5.
The Company has identified specific key financial performance indicators to measure the progress of short and
long term objectives. Certain key financial performance indicators are set out below:
Key Financial Performance Indicators(2)
As at or for the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales growth
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Basic net earnings per common share ($)
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1) ($)
Cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits
Cash flows from operating activities
Adjusted debt(1) to adjusted EBITDA(1)
Free cash flow(1)
Interest coverage(1)
Return on average net assets(1)
Return on average common shareholders' equity attributable to
shareholders of the Company
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2012
1.1%
1,392
1,563
4.8%
2,399
7.3%
3.45
4.46
4,075
1,852
2.3x
946
3.3x
10.7%
9.3%
2011
1.7%
1,609
1,700
5.3%
2,459
7.6%
4.58
4.86
4,101
1,974
2.3x
1,051
4.4x
12.8%
13.1%
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2) For financial definitions and ratios refer to the Glossary beginning on page 130.
8 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Under GAAP, certain expenses and income must be recognized that are not necessarily reflective of the
Company's underlying operating performance. Non-GAAP financial measures exclude the impact of certain items
and are used internally when analyzing consolidated and segment underlying operating performance. These
non-GAAP financial measures are also helpful in assessing underlying operating performance on a consistent
basis. See Section 19, “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” of this MD&A for more information on the Company's
non-GAAP financial measures.
In addition to key financial performance indicators, other operating performance indicators include but are not
limited to: same-store sales growth; operating and administrative cost management; new product development;
customer service ratings; production waste; production efficiencies; and market share.
6.
OVERALL FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
6.1
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As at or for the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Income taxes
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company
Net earnings
Basic net earnings per common share ($)
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1) ($)
Adjusted debt(1) to adjusted EBITDA(1)
Free cash flow(1)
2012
32,742
1,392
1,563
4.8%
2,399
7.3%
417
249
486
726
3.45
4.46
2.3x
946
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2011
32,376
1,609
1,700
5.3%
2,459
7.6%
366
324
635
919
4.58
4.86
2.3x
1,051
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1) for 2012 decreased to $4.46 compared to $4.86 in 2011. The
decrease was primarily attributable to the decline in the operating performance of Loblaw, partially offset by an
improvement in the operating performance of Weston Foods. The decline in the operating performance of
Loblaw was primarily due to incremental investments in the customer proposition and the IT infrastructure
program that operations were not expected to cover, partially offset by improved performance of Loblaw's
Financial Services segment.
The Company's basic net earnings per common share were $3.45 compared to $4.58 in 2011, a decrease of
$1.13. Adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1) decreased $0.40 and excluded the year-over-year
unfavourable net impact of certain items, primarily the impact of certain foreign currency translation, the
forward sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares, restructuring and other charges, and Weston
Foods' accrual of a MEPP mass withdrawal liability as described below, partially offset by the fair value
adjustment of commodity derivatives at Weston Foods.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 9
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
During the fourth quarter of 2012, Loblaw announced a plan that reduced the number of head office and
administrative positions. Focused primarily on management and office positions, the plan affected
approximately 700 positions, and Loblaw incurred a restructuring charge of $61 million associated with these
reductions.
Weston Foods participates in various MEPPs, providing pension benefits to union employees pursuant to
provisions of collective bargaining agreements. During 2012, Weston Foods withdrew from one of the U.S.
MEPPs in which it participated and as a result, paid a withdrawal liability of $34 million. During the fourth
quarter of 2012, another participating employer withdrew from the plan and a mass withdrawal was triggered.
As a result of the mass withdrawal the Company is subject to an incremental withdrawal liability. Until the
current actuarial valuation is made available, the actual amount of the incremental withdrawal liability is
unknown. Management's estimate of this liability is approximately $17 million. This liability was recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2012 and is presented in current provisions and selling, general and administrative expenses in
the Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of earnings, respectively.
•
The Weston Foods operating segment was impacted by the following trends and key factors in 2012:
• economic uncertainty, overall market softness and a highly competitive retail landscape resulted in a general
softening in sales volumes. In addition, recovering cost inflation through pricing was challenging due to a
very difficult sales environment;
changing customer eating and buying preferences toward healthier, more nutritious and value-added
offerings continued in 2012. Weston Foods responded to these trends with innovative and expanded
products across its product portfolio, resulting in new sales growth. These new products included private
label gluten free breads and sweet goods, its Flat Oven Bakery line of international flatbreads, and its strong
portfolio of on-trend offerings under its Wonder, D'Italiano, Country Harvest, Gadoua, and ACE Bakery
brands, including its Wonder and Gadoua MultiGo lines of breads that are free of artificial additives including
preservatives, colours and flavours;
the continuing shift in consumer food shopping patterns towards alternate format retail channels rather than
traditional, conventional supermarket formats resulted in sales growth with these alternate format retailers.
Weston Foods continues to focus on ensuring its products are well positioned to take advantage of this
continuing trend; and
the continuing focus on productivity improvements and other cost reduction initiatives which have
contributed to growth in adjusted operating income(1).
•
•
Weston Foods continued to invest in its brands, introduced new products in response to changing consumer
eating preferences, and invested capital to support growth and enhance quality and productivity in 2012. These
investments, coupled with a continued focus on cost improvement and customer service, resulted in satisfactory
financial performance.
During 2012, Loblaw executed its plan to strengthen its competitive position. Targeted investments to improve
the customer proposition delivered clear signs of progress, key milestones on IT systems initiatives were met,
and planned efficiencies were realized. To further enhance customers’ shopping experience, stores were
renovated and Loblaw strategically invested in square footage with new stores. A number of important strategic
initiatives were also announced during the year. Some of Loblaw’s key accomplishments in 2012 include:
•
invested in an expanded fresh product assortment and related employee training to support an improved
customer experience at competitive prices;
completed the development and implementation of several comprehensive category reviews across both
divisions to improve the competitiveness, profitability and relevance of individual categories;
improved overall net promoter score, a measure of customer satisfaction, by 3 percentage points, through
consistent execution of initiatives to strengthen the customer proposition and competitive position of
Loblaw;
•
•
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
10 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
•
rolled-out a national point of sale system in order to standardize the applications and infrastructure across
the store network in preparation for conversion to Loblaw's new IT system and other new capabilities across
the distribution centre and store network;
• achieved a significant milestone in the implementation of Loblaw's IT system, with the first distribution
•
•
•
centre and first store going live on fully integrated systems with little to no impact on customers;
continued to innovate its control brand products, including a T&T Supermarket Inc. private label pilot in a
selection of Loblaw's mainstream stores;
reset the general merchandise section in 78 stores with differentiated product assortments that are
complementary to a weekly food shop and have compelling value price points;
invested strategically in its store network, renovating and revitalizing 103 stores and opening seven net new
stores, expanding Loblaw's retail square footage to 51.5 million square feet;
• grew the PC Financial Services business by achieving one million new PC MasterCard® applicants and opening
87 additional Mobile Shop locations;
• purchased prescription files from 106 Zellers stores, contributing to prescription count growth;
• announced a relationship with J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JC Penney”) to introduce Joe Fresh women's
apparel to almost 700 JC Penney stores in the U.S. starting in March 2013; and
• announced its intention to create a REIT, which will acquire a significant portion of Loblaw's real estate assets
and sell units by way of an IPO.
Sales
The Company's 2012 consolidated sales increased 1.1% to $32.7 billion from $32.4 billion in 2011.
Consolidated sales growth for 2012 was impacted by each reportable operating segment as follows:
• Negatively by a nominal amount due to a sales decline of 0.4% at Weston Foods. The loss of certain
distributed products that Weston Foods distributed on behalf of certain customers in 2012 negatively
impacted sales and volume growth by approximately 1.0% and 0.4%, respectively, while foreign currency
translation positively impacted sales by approximately 0.4%. Excluding the impact of distributed product and
foreign currency translation, sales increased 0.2% due to the positive impact of pricing across key product
categories of 1.8%, partially offset by a decrease in volume of 1.6%.
• Positively by 1.1% due to sales growth of 1.1% at Loblaw. Same-store retail sales decline was 0.2%
(2011 – growth of 0.9%). Sales growth in food and gas bar were modest, sales in drugstore were flat, sales
in general merchandise, excluding apparel, declined moderately and sales in apparel were flat. Loblaw
experienced modest average annual internal food price inflation during 2012 (2011 – moderate inflation),
which was lower than the average annual national food price inflation of 2.3% (2011 – 4.2%) as measured
by “The Consumer Price Index for Food Purchased from Stores” (“CPI”). During 2012, Loblaw opened 18
corporate and franchise stores and closed 11 corporate and franchise stores, resulting in a net increase of
0.3 million square feet, or 0.6%. Loblaw sales in 2012 were also positively impacted by an increase in its
Financial Services segment revenue.
Operating Income
The Company's 2012 consolidated operating income was $1,392 million compared to $1,609 million in 2011, a
decrease of $217 million, or 13.5%. Consolidated operating income was negatively impacted by restructuring and
other charges, including a charge of $61 million related to the reduction in head office and administrative
positions recorded by Loblaw, and a MEPP withdrawal liability of $51 million incurred by Weston Foods. The
Company's consolidated adjusted operating income(1) was $1,563 million compared to $1,700 million in 2011, a
decrease of $137 million or 8.1%. Consolidated adjusted operating margin(1) was 4.8% in 2012 compared to 5.3%
in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 11
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The Company's year-over-year change in consolidated adjusted operating income(1) was impacted by each of its
reportable operating segments as follows:
• Positively by 0.6% due to an increase of 3.8% in adjusted operating income(1) at Weston Foods. Adjusted
operating income(1) was positively impacted by the benefits realized from productivity improvements and
other cost reduction initiatives and higher pricing in key product categories. These benefits were partially
offset by lower sales volumes and higher commodity and other input costs.
• Negatively by 8.6% due to a decrease of 10.2% in adjusted operating income(1) at Loblaw. The decrease in
adjusted operating income(1) was mainly attributable to an increase in labour and other operating costs,
incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain(2), fixed asset impairment charges net of
recoveries and a slight decline in gross profit, partially offset by higher operating income from its Financial
Services segment. Incremental investments in Loblaw's customer proposition that were not covered by
operations were comprised of $20 million in price and $15 million in shrink, both of which impacted the
slight decline in gross profit, and $20 million in labour. Included in 2011 operating income were start up costs
associated with the launch of Loblaw's Joe Fresh brand in the United States.
The Company's consolidated adjusted EBITDA margin(1) decreased to 7.3% from 7.6% in 2011. The margin was
negatively impacted by Loblaw, partially offset by an improvement in adjusted EBITDA margin(1) at Weston Foods
when compared to 2011.
Net Interest Expense and Other Financing Charges
Net interest expense and other financing charges increased in 2012 by $51 million to $417 million compared to
2011. Net interest and other financing charges are impacted by the fair value adjustment of the forward sale
agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares. This fair value adjustment had an unfavourable year-over-year
impact of $53 million.
Excluding the impact of the fair value adjustment, net interest expense and other financing charges decreased by
$2 million compared to 2011.
Income Taxes
The Company's 2012 effective income tax rate decreased to 25.5% from 26.1% in 2011. This decrease was
primarily due to reductions in the federal and Ontario statutory income tax rates and a recovery on the
revaluation of deferred tax assets on the enactment of the revised Ontario corporate income tax rate, partially
offset by the reversal of previously recognized current tax assets, as described below, and non-deductible foreign
currency translation losses recorded in 2012 (2011 – non-taxable foreign currency translation gains).
In 2012, the Department of Finance substantively enacted amendments to the Income Tax Act relating to the
taxation of Canadian corporations with foreign affiliates. The Company is no longer able to recognize a net tax
benefit on realized foreign capital losses recognized by its foreign affiliates to the extent such losses cannot be
offset against realized foreign capital gains. In 2012, the Company (excluding Loblaw) expensed $8 million in
previously recognized current tax assets relating to these amendments.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2)
Incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain include IT costs, depreciation and amortization and supply chain
project costs.
12 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Net Earnings Attributable to Shareholders of the Company
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company for 2012 were $486 million compared to $635 million
and basic net earnings per common share were $3.45 compared to $4.58 in 2011.
Changes in non-controlling interests did not have a significant impact on the growth of the Company's net
earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company over the past two years. GWL's ownership of Loblaw was
62.9% as at the end of 2012 (2011 – 63.0%; 2010 – 62.9%). GWL's ownership of Loblaw has been impacted over
the past two years by its participation in Loblaw's Dividend Reinvestment Program (“DRIP”) and by other
changes in Loblaw's common share equity.
During 2011, Loblaw issued 938,984 common shares to GWL under the DRIP. During 2011, the Loblaw Board
approved the discontinuance of the DRIP following the dividend payment on April 1, 2011. The DRIP raised
approximately $330 million in total Loblaw common share equity since 2009.
SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION
6.2
The following is an excerpt of selected consolidated financial information from the Company's consolidated
financial statements. The analysis of the data contained in the table focuses on the trends and significant events
or items affecting the results of operations and financial condition of the Company over the latest three year
period.
For the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company
Net earnings
Basic net earnings per common share ($)
Diluted net earnings per common share ($)
Dividends declared per share type ($):
Common shares(1)
Preferred shares – Series I
Preferred shares – Series III
Preferred shares – Series IV
Preferred shares – Series V
2012
32,742
486
726
3.45
3.38
1.46
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
2011
32,376
635
919
4.58
4.55
$
$
1.44
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
$
2010
31,847
452
703
3.16
2.92
$
$
9.19
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(1) 2010 includes a special one-time common share dividend of $7.75 per common share declared in 2010 and paid in January 2011.
($ millions)
Total assets
Total long term debt
Capital securities
Dec. 31, 2012
21,804
6,933
223
$
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2011
21,323
6,844
222
$
$
$
Dec. 31, 2010
21,696
7,316
221
$
$
$
Over the past three years, the Company's consolidated sales have improved despite a challenging economic
environment. Weston Foods sales have been impacted by pricing, the acquisitions of Keystone Bakery Holdings
LLC (“Keystone”) and ACE Bakery Ltd. (“ACE”), foreign currency translation and certain key market trends such as
changing consumer eating and buying preferences and the continuing shift in consumer food shopping patterns
toward alternate format retail channels. Loblaw's sales were under pressure in a competitively intense retail
marketplace with an uncertain economic environment.
In 2012, Weston Foods sales and volumes were negatively impacted by the loss of certain distributed products.
Excluding this loss, sales in 2012 were positively impacted by foreign currency translation and pricing across key
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 13
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
product categories, partially offset by a decline in volumes. Weston Foods sales and volumes in 2011 and in the
second half of 2010 were positively impacted by the acquisitions of Keystone and ACE. Excluding these
acquisitions, 2011 sales were positively impacted by higher pricing across key product categories, partially offset
by the negative impact of foreign currency translation and lower sales volumes compared to 2010.
Loblaw's average annual national food price inflation as measured by CPI was 2.3% in 2012 and 4.2% in 2011. In
2012 and 2011, Loblaw's average annual internal retail food price index was lower than CPI. Loblaw experienced
modest average annual internal food price inflation in 2012 and moderate inflation in 2011. In 2012, same-store
sales decline was 0.2% compared to growth of 0.9% in 2011. During 2012, the number of corporate and
franchise stores increased to 1,053 (2011 – 1,046; 2010 – 1,027). Retail square footage in 2012 increased to
51.5 million (2011 – 51.2 million; 2010 – 50.7 million).
Over the last three years, the Company's consolidated operating income was impacted by the following items:
restructuring and other charges incurred by Weston Foods and Loblaw, including a charge of $61 million
•
related to the reduction in head office and administrative positions recorded by Loblaw;
fair value adjustment of commodity derivatives at Weston Foods;
fluctuations in share-based compensation net of equity derivatives of both GWL and Loblaw;
•
•
• a charge related to the MEPP withdrawal liability incurred by Weston Foods in 2012;
• a gain related to a Weston Foods post-retirement plan change in 2012;
insurance proceeds recorded by Weston Foods in 2012 and 2011;
•
•
the effect of certain prior years' commodity tax matters at Loblaw recorded in 2011;
• a gain related to the sale of a portion of a Loblaw property recorded in 2011; and
•
the effect of foreign currency translation on a portion of the U.S. dollar denominated cash and short term
investments held by Dunedin Holdings GmbH (“Dunedin”), a subsidiary of GWL, and certain of its affiliates.
At Weston Foods, operating income during 2012 and 2011 was positively impacted by the benefits realized from
productivity improvements and other cost reduction initiatives and higher pricing in certain product categories.
In 2012, these benefits were partially offset by lower sales volumes and higher commodity and other input costs.
Operating income in 2011 was also positively impacted by the acquisitions of Keystone and ACE, partially offset
by higher commodity and fuel costs and the continued escalation in labour and related benefit costs.
To better position itself in an intensely competitive market place, Loblaw made investments in its customer
proposition that were not covered by operations in 2012. These investments were focused on price, assortment
and customer service and impacted both gross profit and selling, general and administrative expenses. In both
2012 and 2011, Loblaw's operating income was significantly impacted by incremental supply chain and IT
charges related to its infrastructure implementation and charges associated with transitioning certain Ontario
conventional stores to the more cost effective and efficient operating terms of collective agreements ratified in
2010. Operating income in 2012 and 2011 was further impacted by year-over-year fluctuations in fixed asset
impairment charges and recoveries.
Fluctuations in the Company's consolidated net interest and other financing charges were primarily driven by the
fair value adjustment of the forward sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares, lower average debt
levels combined with the issuance of lower interest rate Medium Term Notes (“MTN”) and the repayment of
higher interest rate MTNs. President's Choice Bank (“PC Bank”) also introduced its guaranteed investment
certificate (“GIC”) program in 2010.
Fluctuations in the Company's income tax expense were primarily driven by non-taxable foreign currency
translation gains and non-deductible foreign currency translation losses, reductions in federal and Ontario
statutory income tax rates and a decrease in prior year income tax matters. Income tax expense in 2012 was
negatively impacted by the reversal of current tax assets due to substantively enacted legislation. Income tax
expense in 2010 was negatively impacted by charges related to changes in the federal tax legislation that
resulted in the elimination of the Company's ability to deduct costs associated with cash-settled stock options
and certain prior year income tax matters.
14 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
The Company's total assets in 2012 increased by 2.3% compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in fixed assets as a result of Loblaw's capital investment program, including the incremental investment
in IT and supply chain and increases in Loblaw's accounts receivable and credit card receivables from Loblaw's
Financial Services segment. The increase was partially offset by the appreciation of the Canadian dollar relative
to the U.S. dollar, which caused a decrease in the translated amounts of U.S. dollar denominated net assets. The
Company's total assets in 2011 decreased by 1.7% compared to 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the
payment of the $1.0 billion special one-time share dividend, partially offset by an increase in fixed assets as a
result of Loblaw's capital investment program, including incremental investment in IT and supply chain and
increases in Loblaw's accounts receivable. The decrease was also partially offset by the depreciation of the
Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar, which caused an increase in the translated amounts of U.S. dollar
denominated net assets.
The Company's total long term debt in 2012 increased by 1.3% compared to 2011. The increase was primarily
due to the increase in PC Bank's GIC program, and increases in debt associated with Loblaw's Independent
Funding Trusts and finance lease obligations. The Company's total long term debt in 2011 decreased by 6.5%
compared to 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the repayment by Loblaw of its $350 million, 6.50% MTN
and its $500 million of Eagle Credit Card Trust (“Eagle”) notes, partially offset by the issuance of GICs.
The Company holds significant cash and short term investments denominated in Canadian and U.S. dollars.
Cash flows from operating activities have exceeded the funding requirements for the Company over the past
three years.
RESULTS OF REPORTABLE OPERATING SEGMENTS
7.
The following discussion provides details of the 2012 results of operations of each of the Company's reportable
operating segments.
7.1 WESTON FOODS OPERATING RESULTS
For the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Return on average net assets(1)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2012
1,765
228
275
15.6%
334
18.9%
24.9%
2011
1,772
208
265
15.0%
325
18.3%
24.5%
Sales
Weston Foods sales for 2012 of $1,765 million decreased by 0.4%, and volumes decreased by 2.0%, compared to
2011. The loss of certain frozen distributed products that Weston Foods distributed on behalf of certain
customers in 2012 negatively impacted sales growth and volume growth by approximately 1.0% and 0.4%,
respectively, while foreign currency translation positively impacted sales by approximately 0.4%. Excluding the
impact of distributed product and foreign currency translation, sales increased by 0.2% due to the positive
impact of pricing across key product categories of 1.8%, partially offset by a decrease in volume of 1.6%.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 15
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The following sales analysis excludes the impact of foreign currency translation.
Fresh bakery sales, principally bread, rolls, bagels, tortillas and sweet goods represented approximately 35% of
total Weston Foods sales, which were down from approximately 36% in 2011. Fresh bakery sales decreased by
approximately 3.3% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to lower sales volumes partially offset by the
impact of price increases implemented in the beginning of the second quarter of 2011. Volumes decreased in
2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to a difficult sales environment. The introduction of new products in the last
twelve months, such as Country Harvest Cranberry Muesli and Flax and Quinoa breads, D'Italiano Brizzolio rolls
and Gadoua Pain de Ménage, contributed positively to branded sales in 2012. In addition, during the fourth
quarter of 2012, Weston Foods launched private label gluten free bread and sweet goods and the Flat Oven
Bakery line of international flatbreads.
Frozen bakery sales, principally bread, rolls, doughnuts, cakes and sweet goods represented approximately 47%
of total Weston Foods sales in 2012 and 2011. Frozen bakery sales decreased by approximately 2.3% in 2012
compared to 2011 primarily driven by the loss of certain distributed products. Excluding the effect of the loss of
these distributed products, frozen bakery sales decreased approximately 0.3% in 2012 compared to 2011.
Biscuit sales, principally wafers, ice-cream cones, cookies and crackers represented approximately 18% of total
Weston Foods sales, which were up from approximately 17% in 2011. Biscuit sales increased by approximately
9.2% in 2012 compared to 2011 due to higher volumes as well as the positive impact of pricing and changes in
sales mix. Volumes increased compared to 2011 mainly due to growth in cookie and wafer sales.
Operating Income
Weston Foods operating income for 2012 increased by $20 million, or 9.6%, to $228 million compared to
$208 million in 2011. Operating margin for 2012 was 12.9% compared to 11.7% in 2011. The change in the fair
value adjustment of commodity derivatives, share-based compensation net of equity derivatives and the accrual
of a MEPP withdrawal liability had a year-over-year favourable net impact of $5 million on Weston Foods
operating income.
Adjusted operating income(1) increased by $10 million, or 3.8%, to $275 million in 2012 from $265 million in
2011. Adjusted operating margin(1) was 15.6% in 2012 compared to 15.0% in 2011.
Gross margin, excluding the impact of the commodity derivatives fair value adjustment, decreased in 2012
compared to 2011. The commodity derivatives fair value adjustment is described in Section 19, “Non-GAAP
Financial Measures” of this MD&A.
Adjusted operating income(1) in 2012 was positively impacted by the benefits realized from productivity
improvements and other cost reduction initiatives and higher pricing in key product categories. These benefits
were partially offset by lower sales volumes and higher commodity and other input costs.
Weston Foods continuously evaluates strategic and cost reduction initiatives related to its manufacturing assets,
distribution networks and administrative infrastructure with the objective of ensuring a low cost operating
structure. Restructuring activities related to these initiatives are ongoing and in 2012, charges of $12 million
(2011 – $13 million) were recorded in operating income.
Adjusted EBITDA(1) increased by $9 million, or 2.8%, to $334 million in 2012 compared to $325 million in 2011.
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) for 2012 increased to 18.9% from 18.3% in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
16 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
7.2
LOBLAW OPERATING RESULTS
For the years ended December 31
($ millions where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Return on average net assets(1)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2012
31,604
1,188
1,288
4.1%
2,065
6.5%
9.8%
2011
31,250
1,376
1,435
4.6%
2,134
6.8%
11.7%
Loblaw has two reportable operating segments: Retail and Financial Services. Loblaw is one reportable operating
segment of GWL.
In 2012, Loblaw invested to strengthen its customer proposition and at the same time continued with its ongoing
IT infrastructure renewal program. With investments in the customer proposition, Loblaw made progress in
delivering an improved price position, enhanced assortment and variety, particularly in fresh departments, and
better in-store execution and customer service.
Sales
Loblaw sales for 2012 increased by 1.1% to $31.6 billion compared to $31.3 billion in 2011. The increase in retail
sales in 2012 of $257 million, or 0.8%, compared to 2011 was impacted by the following factors:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
same-store sales decline was 0.2% (2011 – growth of 0.9%);
sales growth in food was modest;
sales in drugstore were flat;
sales growth in gas bar was modest;
sales in general merchandise, excluding apparel, declined moderately;
sales in apparel were flat;
Loblaw experienced modest average annual internal food price inflation during 2012 (2011 – moderate
inflation), which was lower than the average annual national food price inflation of 2.3% (2011 – 4.2%) as
measured by CPI. CPI does not necessarily reflect the effect of inflation on the specific mix of goods sold in
Loblaw stores; and
• 18 (2011 – 26) corporate and franchise stores were opened and 11 (2011 – seven) corporate and franchise
stores were closed, resulting in a net increase of 0.3 million square feet, or 0.6%.
In 2012, Loblaw launched over 650 new control brand products and redesigned and/or improved the packaging
of approximately 750 other products. Sales of control brand products in 2012 were $9.4 billion compared to
$9.5 billion in 2011.
Loblaw sales for 2012 were also positively impacted by an increase in revenue of $97 million, or 17.7%, from its
Financial Services segment when compared to 2011. The increase was primarily driven by higher PC Telecom
revenues resulting from the launch of the Mobile Shop kiosk business in the fourth quarter of 2011 and higher
interest and interchange fee income as a result of increased credit card transaction values and higher credit card
receivable balances.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 17
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Operating Income
Loblaw operating income of $1,188 million for 2012 decreased $188 million, or 13.7%, compared to
$1,376 million in 2011, resulting in a decrease in operating margin to 3.8% in 2012 from 4.4% in 2011. Loblaw
operating income was negatively impacted by restructuring and other charges, including a charge of $61 million
related to the reduction in head office and administrative positions recorded by Loblaw, a gain on sale of a
portion of a Loblaw property recorded in 2011 of $14 million and a decline in adjusted operating income(1) of
$147 million, or 10.2% as described below.
Loblaw adjusted operating income(1) decreased to $1,288 million in 2012 from $1,435 million in 2011. Adjusted
operating margin(1) was 4.1% in 2012 compared to 4.6% in 2011. Retail adjusted operating income(1) declined by
$170 million and was partially offset by an increase in Financial Services operating income of $23 million
compared to 2011.
Gross profit generated by Loblaw's Retail segment decreased by $1 million in 2012 to $6,819 million compared
to $6,820 million and gross profit as a percentage of retail sales was 22.0% compared to 22.2% in 2011. The
decline in gross profit percentage was primarily driven by investments in food margins and increased shrink,
partially offset by margin improvements in drugstore. The decrease of $1 million was driven by the investments
in gross profit percentage, almost completely offset by higher sales. In 2012, gross profit included an estimated
$35 million of the incremental investment in Loblaw's customer proposition that was not covered by operations,
of which $20 million was in price and $15 million was in shrink related to improved assortment in stores.
The decreases in adjusted operating income(1) and adjusted operating margin(1) compared to 2011 were
attributable to an increase in labour and other operating costs, incremental costs of $75 million related to
investments in IT and supply chain(2), a charge of $38 million (2011 – $35 million) related to the transition of
certain Ontario conventional stores to the more cost effective and efficient operating terms of collective
agreements ratified in 2010, a charge of $17 million (2011 – $5 million) for fixed asset impairment losses net of
recoveries and the slight decrease in gross profit. The increase in labour costs included an estimated $20 million
of the incremental investment in Loblaw's customer proposition related to improved service in stores that was
not covered by operations. In 2011, start up costs of $21 million associated with the launch of Loblaw's Joe Fresh
brand in the U.S. were incurred. The decrease in Loblaw's Retail segment adjusted operating income(1) was
partially offset by an increase in the operating income of Loblaw's Financial Services segment. The increase in
Loblaw's Financial Services segment operating income was attributable to higher revenue which was partially
offset by investments in the launch of PC Telecom's Mobile Shop kiosk business, higher PC points loyalty costs
and a higher allowance for credit card receivables on higher receivables balances.
During 2012, restructuring charges of $61 million associated with the reduction in head office and administrative
positions were recorded in operating income and other charges of $11 million (2011 – $23 million) were
recorded in operating income related to changes in Loblaw's distribution network. In 2011, other charges also
included a charge of $8 million related to an internal realignment of Loblaw's business centered around its two
primary store formats, conventional and discount.
Adjusted EBITDA(1) decreased by $69 million, or 3.2%, to $2,065 million in 2012 compared to $2,134 million in
2011. Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) decreased to 6.5% compared to 6.8% in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2)
Incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain include IT costs, depreciation and amortization and supply chain
project costs.
18 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
8.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
8.1
MAJOR CASH FLOW COMPONENTS
For the years ended December 31
($ millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows used in investing activities
Cash flows used in financing activities
2012
1,852
(916)
(711)
$
$
$
2011
1,974
(15)
(2,049)
$
$
$
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities in 2012 were $1,852 million compared to $1,974 million in 2011. The
decrease was due to an increase in credit card receivables and the year-over-year decrease in net earnings
before non-cash items, partially offset by changes in non-cash working capital.
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities in 2012 were $916 million compared to $15 million in 2011. The increase
was primarily due to an increase in fixed asset purchases, intangible asset additions of approximately $31 million
related to Loblaw's purchase of Zellers prescription files and the changes in short term investments and security
deposits. In 2011, cash inflows were primarily due to the cash generated from short term investments and
security deposits in order to fund the $1.0 billion special one-time common share dividend in January 2011 and
the repayment of the Eagle notes as discussed in the “Cash Flows used in Financing Activities” section below.
The presentation of the Company's investments as cash equivalents or short term investments is based on the
term to maturity of the investments at the time they are acquired.
The Company's capital investment in 2012 was $1.1 billion (2011 – $1.0 billion). Weston Foods' capital
investment was $93 million (2011 – $40 million). Loblaw's capital investment was $1.0 billion (2011 –
$1.0 billion). Approximately 15% (2011 – 17%) of Loblaw's investment was for new store developments,
expansions and land, approximately 31% (2011 – 32%) was for store conversions and renovations, and
approximately 54% (2011 – 51%) was for infrastructure investments.
Loblaw expects to invest approximately $1.0 billion in capital expenditures in 2013. Approximately 25% of these
funds are expected to be dedicated to investing in the IT infrastructure and supply chain projects, 65% will be
spent on retail operations and 10% on other infrastructure.
Loblaw's 2012 corporate and franchise store capital investment program, which included the impact of store
openings and closures, resulted in an increase in net retail square footage of 0.6% compared to 2011. During
2012, 18 (2011 – 26) corporate and franchise stores were opened and 11 (2011 – seven) corporate and
franchise stores were closed, resulting in a net increase of 0.3 million (2011 – 0.5 million) square feet. In 2012,
181 (2011 – 121) corporate and franchise stores were renovated.
At year end 2012, the Company had committed approximately $76 million (2011 – $55 million) for the
construction, expansion and renovation of buildings and the purchase of real property.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Cash Flows used in Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financing activities in 2012 were $711 million compared to $2,049 million in 2011. The
decrease was primarily due to the payment of the $1.0 billion special one-time common share dividend in
January 2011, GWL's and Loblaw's purchases of common shares for cancellation in the fourth quarter of 2011,
partially offset by the cash received from the securitization of $370 million credit card receivables in 2011, and
lower net repayments of long term debt in 2012 as detailed below.
During 2012, GWL and Loblaw completed the following financing activities:
• GWL issued $39 million of Series B Debentures;
• GWL issued 41,361 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of $2 million;
• GWL purchased for cancellation 9,212 common shares for $1 million;
•
Loblaw issued 718,544 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of
$22 million;
Loblaw purchased for cancellation 423,705 common shares for $16 million;
•
• PC Bank issued $76 million of GICs; and
• PC Bank repaid $49 million in GICs.
During 2011, GWL and Loblaw completed the following financing activities:
• GWL issued $350 million of unsecured 3.78% MTN, Series 2-A;
• GWL repaid $300 million of 6.45% MTN;
• GWL issued $39 million of Series B Debentures;
• GWL paid a $1.0 billion special one-time common share dividend;
• GWL issued 17,560 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of $1 million;
• GWL purchased for cancellation 902,379 common shares for $61 million;
•
•
•
• Eagle repaid $500 million of Series 2006-I notes;
• PC Bank securitized $370 million in credit card receivables;
• PC Bank issued $264 million of GICs; and
• PC Bank repaid $6 million in GICs.
Loblaw repaid $350 million 6.50% MTN;
Loblaw issued 686,794 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of $21 million;
Loblaw purchased for cancellation 1,021,986 common shares for $39 million;
Free Cash Flow(1)
In 2012, free cash flow(1) of $946 million decreased by $105 million compared to $1,051 million in 2011. This
decrease was driven by an increase in the Company's capital investment program and the change in cash flows
from operating activities, excluding the net increase in credit card receivables, as described above.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Contributions
During 2013, the Company expects to contribute approximately $175 million (2012 – contributed approximately
$176 million) to its registered funded defined benefit pension plans. The actual amount paid may vary from the
estimate based on actuarial valuations being completed, investment performance, volatility in discount rates,
regulatory requirements and other factors. In 2013, the Company also expects to make contributions to its
defined contribution plans and the MEPPs in which it participates as well as make benefit payments to the
beneficiaries of the supplemental unfunded defined benefit pension plans, other defined benefit plans and other
long term employee benefit plans.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
20 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
8.2
SOURCES OF LIQUIDITY
Adjusted Debt(1) to Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted debt(1) to Adjusted EBITDA(1)
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
2.3x
Dec. 31, 2011
2.3x
The Company monitors its adjusted debt(1) to adjusted EBITDA(1) ratio as a measure to ensure it is operating
under an efficient capital structure. This ratio remained flat when compared to 2011, driven primarily by a
nominal increase in adjusted debt(1), and a nominal decrease in adjusted EBITDA(1). The increase in adjusted
debt(1) when compared to 2011 was primarily due to an increase in Loblaw's finance lease obligations. The
decrease in adjusted EBITDA(1) was primarily due to a decrease in Loblaw's adjusted EBITDA(1) partially offset by
an increase in Weston Foods adjusted EBITDA(1). The decrease in Loblaw's adjusted EBITDA(1) was driven by a
decline in adjusted operating income(1) from its Retail business compared to 2011, as described in Section 7,
“Results of Reportable Operating Segments” of this MD&A.
The Company holds significant cash and cash equivalents and short term investments denominated in Canadian
and U.S. dollars. These funds are invested in highly liquid marketable short term investments consisting primarily
of bankers' acceptances, government treasury bills, corporate commercial paper, bank term deposits and
government agency securities.
The Company (excluding Loblaw) expects that cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and future
operating cash flows will enable it to finance its capital investment program and fund its ongoing business
requirements, including working capital, pension plan funding and financial obligations over the next 12 months.
During 2011, GWL filed a Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus (“Prospectus”) which allows for the issuance of up to
$1.5 billion in unsecured debentures and/or preferred shares over a 25-month period and a Prospectus
Supplement creating an MTN, Series 2 program pursuant to which it may issue unsecured debentures up to
$1.0 billion. During 2011, GWL issued $350 million principal amount of five-year unsecured MTN pursuant to this
program. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually at a fixed rate of 3.78%. The notes are unsecured
obligations and are redeemable at the option of GWL. Also, during 2011, GWL's $300 million 6.45% MTN
matured and was repaid. GWL may refinance maturing long term debt with MTNs if market conditions are
appropriate or it may consider other alternatives. The Company (excluding Loblaw) does not foresee any
impediments in obtaining financing to satisfy its long term obligations.
Loblaw expects that cash and cash equivalents, short term investments, future operating cash flows and the
amounts available to be drawn against its $800 million committed credit facility will enable Loblaw to finance its
capital investment program and fund its ongoing business requirements, including working capital, pension plan
funding and financial obligations over the next 12 months. Loblaw has traditionally obtained its long term
financing primarily through an MTN program. Loblaw may refinance maturing long term debt if market
conditions are appropriate or it may consider other alternatives. In addition, given reasonable access to capital
markets, Loblaw does not foresee any material impediments in obtaining financing to satisfy its long term
obligations.
During 2012, Loblaw renewed and extended its committed credit facility to March 2017. At year end 2012 and
2011, there were no amounts drawn upon this facility. During 2011, Loblaw amended its agreements for this
facility and its U.S. $300 million private placement notes to include certain relevant IFRS adjustments in
computing the financial metrics that are used in calculating Loblaw's financial covenants. These amendments
largely served to neutralize the impact of IFRS on the covenant calculations as of the date of conversion. At year
end 2012, Loblaw was in compliance with all of its covenants.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 21
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
During 2012, Loblaw filed a Prospectus which expires in 2015, allowing for the potential issuance of up to
$1.0 billion of unsecured debentures and/or preferred shares subject to the availability of funding in capital
markets. Loblaw had filed a similar Prospectus in 2010 that expired in 2012.
During 2012, GWL and Loblaw entered into agreements to cash collateralize certain uncommitted credit facilities
up to amounts of $45 million (2011 – $40 million) and $133 million (2011 – $88 million), respectively. As at year
end 2012, $142 million (2011 – $125 million) was deposited with major financial institutions and classified as
security deposits on the consolidated balance sheets.
During 2012, following Loblaw's announcement of its intention to create a REIT, Dominion Bond Rating Service
and Standard & Poor's reaffirmed GWL's and Loblaw's credit ratings and trends and outlooks, respectively. These
ratings organizations base their forward-looking credit ratings on both quantitative and qualitative
considerations.
The following table sets out the current credit ratings of GWL:
Credit Ratings (Canadian Standards)
Medium term notes
Preferred shares
Other notes and debentures
Dominion Bond Rating Service
Credit Rating
BBB
Pfd-3
BBB
Trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
The following table sets out the current credit ratings of Loblaw:
Credit Ratings (Canadian Standards)
Medium term notes
Preferred shares
Other notes and debentures
Dominion Bond Rating Service
Credit Rating
BBB
Pfd-3
BBB
Trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Standard & Poor's
Credit Rating Outlook
BBB
P-3 (high)
BBB
Stable
Stable
Stable
Standard & Poor's
Credit Rating Outlook
BBB
P-3 (high)
BBB
Stable
Stable
Stable
Independent Securitization Trusts
Loblaw, through PC Bank, participates in various securitization programs that provide the primary source of
funds for the operation of its credit card business. PC Bank sells credit card receivables to these Independent
Securitization Trusts, including Eagle and Other Independent Securitization Trusts, from time to time depending
on PC Bank’s financing requirements. During 2012, PC Bank amended and extended the maturity date for two of
its independent securitization trust agreements from the third quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2015,
with all other terms and conditions remaining substantially the same.
Loblaw has arranged letters of credit on behalf of PC Bank, representing 9% (2011 – 9%) of the outstanding
securitized liability for the benefit of the Other Independent Securitization Trusts in the amount of $81 million
(2011 – $81 million). In the event of a major decline in the income flow from or in the value of the securitized
credit card receivables, the Other Independent Securitization Trusts can draw upon these letters of credit to
recover up to a maximum of the amount outstanding on the letters of credit. Under its securitization programs,
PC Bank is required to maintain at all times a credit card receivable pool balance equal to a minimum of 107% of
the outstanding securitized liability and was in compliance with this requirement throughout the year.
Guaranteed Investment Certificates
In addition to participating in various securitization programs to fund its operations, PC Bank obtains short term
and long term financing through its GIC program. During 2012, PC Bank sold $76 million (2011 – $264 million) in
GICs through independent brokers. In addition, during 2012, $49 million (2011 – $6 million) of GICs matured and
were repaid. As at year end 2012, $303 million (2011 – $276 million) was recorded in long term debt of which
$36 million (2011 – $46 million ) was recorded as long term debt due within one year.
22 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Independent Funding Trusts
Certain independent franchisees of Loblaw obtain financing through a structure involving independent funding
trusts, which were created to provide loans to the independent franchisees to facilitate their purchase of
inventory and fixed assets, consisting mainly of fixtures and equipment. These independent funding trusts are
administered by a major financial institution.
During 2012, Loblaw amended and increased the size of the revolving committed credit facility that is the source
of funding to the independent funding trusts from $475 million to $575 million. Other terms and conditions
remain substantially the same. This facility bears interest at variable rates and expires in 2014. As at year end
2012, the independent funding trusts had drawn $459 million (2011 – $424 million) from this committed credit
facility.
Loblaw provides credit enhancement in the form of a standby letter of credit for the benefit of the independent
funding trusts representing not less than 10% (2011 – 10%) of the principal amount of the loans outstanding. As
at year end 2012, Loblaw had provided a letter of credit in the amount of $48 million (2011 – $48 million). This
credit enhancement allows the independent funding trusts to provide financing to Loblaw's independent
franchisees. As well, each independent franchisee provides security to the independent funding trusts for its
obligations by way of a general security agreement. In the event that an independent franchisee defaults on its
loan and Loblaw has not, within a specified time period, assumed the loan, or the default is not otherwise
remedied, the independent funding trusts would assign the loan to Loblaw and draw upon this standby letter of
credit. This standby letter of credit has never been drawn upon. Loblaw has agreed to reimburse the issuing bank
for any amount drawn on the standby letter of credit.
8.3
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Outstanding Share Capital and Capital Securities
GWL's outstanding share capital is comprised of common shares and preferred shares. The following table
details the authorized and outstanding common shares and preferred shares as at December 31, 2012:
Common shares
Preferred shares – Series I
– Series II
– Series III
– Series IV
– Series V
Authorized
Unlimited
10,000,000
10,600,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
8,000,000
Outstanding
128,221,841
9,400,000
8,000,000
8,000,000
8,000,000
GWL may, at its option, redeem for cash, in whole or in part, the preferred shares Series I, Series III, Series IV and
Series V outstanding on or after the redemption dates specified by the terms of each series of preferred shares.
GWL may at any time after issuance give the holders of these preferred shares the right, at the option of the
holder, to convert the holder's preferred shares into preferred shares of a further series designated by GWL on a
share-for-share basis on a date specified by GWL.
At year end 2012, a total of 1,436,234 GWL stock options were outstanding, representing 1.1% of GWL's issued
and outstanding common shares. The number of stock options outstanding was within the Company's guidelines
of 5% of the total number of outstanding shares. Each stock option is exercisable into one common share of GWL
at the price specified in the terms of the option agreement. Commencing February 22, 2011, GWL amended its
stock option plan whereby the right to receive a cash payment in lieu of exercising an option for shares was
removed.
Twelve million non-voting Loblaw Second Preferred Shares, Series A, are authorized and 9.0 million were
outstanding at year end 2012. These preferred shares are presented as capital securities and are included in long
term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Dividends on capital securities are presented in net interest
expense and other financing charges on the consolidated statements of earnings.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 23
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Dividends
($)
Dividends declared per share ($) – Common share
– Preferred share:
Series I
Series III
Series IV
Series V
$
2012
1.46
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
2011
1.44
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
During 2012, the Company amended its dividend policy to state: the declaration and payment of dividends on
the Company's common shares and the amount thereof are at the discretion of the Board which takes into
account the Company's financial results, capital requirements, available cash flow, future prospects of the
Company's business and other factors considered relevant from time to time. Over the long term, it is the
Company's intention to increase the amount of the dividend while retaining appropriate free cash flow to
finance future growth. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Board raised the quarterly common share dividend
by $0.02 per share to $0.38 per share.
Subsequent to year end 2012, common share dividends of $0.38 (2011 – $0.36) per share and preferred share
dividends of $0.32 (2011 – $0.32) per share for the Series III and Series IV preferred shares and dividends of
$0.30 (2011 – $0.30) per share for the Series V preferred shares, payable on April 1, 2013, were declared by the
Board. In addition, dividends of $0.36 (2011 – $0.36) per share for the Series I preferred shares, payable on
March 15, 2013, were also declared.
At the time such dividends are declared, GWL identifies on its website (www.weston.ca) the designation of
eligible and ineligible dividends in accordance with the administrative position of the Canada Revenue
Agency (“CRA”).
Normal Course Issuer Bid (“NCIB”) Programs
In 2012, GWL and Loblaw renewed their NCIB programs to purchase on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”)
or enter into equity derivatives to purchase up to 6,409,499 (2011 – 6,454,276) and 14,070,352
(2011 – 14,096,437) of their common shares, respectively, representing approximately 5% of their common
shares outstanding. In accordance with the rules and regulations of the TSX, any purchases must be at the then
market prices of such shares. During 2012, GWL purchased for cancellation 9,212 (2011 – 902,379) of its
common shares for $1 million (2011 – $61 million). During 2012, Loblaw purchased for cancellation 423,705
(2011 – 1,021,986) of its common shares for $16 million (2011 – $39 million). In 2013, GWL and Loblaw each
intend to renew their NCIB programs.
24 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
8.4
The Company's financial derivative instruments and the nature of risks that they may be subject to are described
in Section 13.2, “Financial Risks and Risk Management” of this MD&A.
Cross Currency Swaps
As at year end 2012, Glenhuron Bank Limited (“Glenhuron”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Loblaw, held
outstanding cross currency swaps to exchange U.S. dollars for $1,199 million (2011 – $1,252 million) Canadian
dollars. The swaps mature by 2019 and are financial derivatives classified as fair value through profit or loss.
Currency adjustments receivable or payable arising from these swaps are settled in cash on maturity. As at year
end 2012, a cumulative unrealized foreign currency exchange rate receivable of $93 million (2011 – $89 million)
was recorded in other assets and a receivable of $20 million (2011 – $48 million) was recorded in prepaid
expenses and other assets. In 2012, a fair value gain of $25 million (2011 – loss of $29 million) was recognized in
operating income relating to these cross currency swaps. Offsetting the fair value gain was a loss of $27 million
(2011 – gain of $25 million) as a result of translating U.S. $1,113 million (2011 – U.S. $1,073 million) cash and
cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits, which was also recognized in operating income.
In 2008, Loblaw entered into fixed cross currency swaps to exchange $148 million Canadian dollars for U.S.
$150 million, which mature in the second quarter of 2013 and entered into additional fixed cross currency swaps
to exchange $148 million Canadian dollars for U.S. $150 million, which mature in 2015. A portion of these cross
currency swaps was originally designated in a cash flow hedge to manage the foreign exchange variability related
to part of Loblaw's fixed-rate U.S. dollar private placement notes. In 2011, the designated swap was no longer
classified as a cash flow hedge and as a result, the fair value changes were recorded in operating income. As at
year end 2012, a cumulative unrealized foreign currency exchange rate receivable of $5 million (2011 –
$14 million) was recorded in other assets and a receivable of $2 million (2011 – nil) was recorded in prepaid
expenses and other assets. In 2012, Loblaw recognized an unrealized fair value loss of $7 million (2011 – gain of
$2 million) in operating income related to these cross currency swaps. Offsetting the unrealized fair value loss
was an unrealized foreign currency translation gain of $6 million (2011 – loss of $6 million), which was also
recognized in operating income related to the translation of the U.S. $300 million fixed rate private placement
notes.
Interest Rate Swaps
Loblaw maintains a notional $150 million (2011 – $150 million) in interest rate swaps that mature by the third
quarter of 2013, on which it pays a fixed rate of 8.38%. As at year end 2012, the fair value of these interest rate
swaps of $5 million (2011 – $16 million) was recorded in other liabilities. In 2012, Loblaw recognized a fair value
gain of $11 million (2011 – $8 million) in operating income related to these swaps.
Interest rate swaps previously held by Glenhuron converted a notional $200 million of floating rate cash and cash
equivalents, short term investments and security deposits to average fixed rate investments at 4.74%. These
interest rate swaps matured in 2011. During 2011, Glenhuron recognized a fair value loss of $7 million on these
interest rate swaps in operating income.
Equity Derivative Contracts
As at year end 2012, GWL had an equity swap contract to buy 0.8 million (2011 – 0.8 million) GWL common
shares at a forward price of $107.26 (2011 – $107.26) per share. As at year end 2012, the unrealized market loss
of $29 million (2011 – $31 million) was recorded in trade and other payables. In 2012, GWL recorded a fair value
gain of $2 million (2011 – loss of $15 million) in operating income in relation to this equity swap contract.
During 2011, GWL amended its swap agreements to adjust the forward price of its equity swaps by $7.75 from
an average forward price of $103.17 to an average forward price of $95.42 as a result of the special one-time
common share dividend of $7.75 per common share paid in January 2011. Also during 2011, GWL paid
$75 million to terminate one equity swap contract and purchase for cancellation the underlying 886,700 GWL
common shares under its NCIB program. Subsequent to the end of 2012, GWL settled its remaining equity swap
contract as described in Section 9, “Other Business Matters” of this MD&A.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 25
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
As at year end 2012, Glenhuron had an equity forward contract to buy 1.1 million (2011 – 1.1 million) Loblaw
common shares at an average forward price of $56.59 (2011 – $56.38) including $0.16 of interest expense
(2011 – $0.05 interest income) per common share. As at year end 2012, the cumulative accrued interest and
unrealized market loss of $16 million (2011 – $20 million) was included in trade and other payables. In 2012,
Glenhuron recognized a fair value gain of $5 million (2011 – loss of $2 million) in operating income in relation to
this equity forward contract.
During 2011, Glenhuron paid $7 million to terminate equity forwards representing 390,100 Loblaw common
shares, which Loblaw purchased for cancellation under its NCIB for $15 million. Subsequent to the end of 2012,
Loblaw settled its remaining equity forward contract as described in Section 9, “Other Business Matters” of this
MD&A.
In 2001, Weston Holdings Limited (“WHL”), a subsidiary of GWL, entered into an equity forward sale agreement
based on 9.6 million Loblaw common shares at an original forward price of $48.50 per Loblaw common share. As
at year end 2012, the forward price had increased to $92.26 (2011 – $88.14) per Loblaw common share under
the terms of the agreement and the fair value of this forward sale agreement of $483 million (2011 –
$478 million) was recorded in other assets. In 2012, a fair value loss of $35 million (2011 – gain of $18 million)
was recorded in net interest expense and other financing charges related to this agreement.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
8.5
The following illustrates certain of the Company's significant contractual obligations and discusses other
obligations as at year end 2012:
Summary of Contractual Obligations
Payments due by year
($ millions)
Long term debt including fixed
interest payments(1)
Operating leases(2)
Contracts for purchase of real
property and capital
investment projects(3)
Purchase obligations(4)
Total contractual obligations
$
$
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Thereafter
Total
1,014 $
212
1,472 $
195
808 $
171
1,021 $
140
301 $
115
6,899 $ 11,515
1,288
455
73
244
1,543 $
1
121
1,789 $
1
75
1,055 $
1
26
1,188 $
76
490
7,354 $ 13,369
24
440 $
(1) Based on the maturing face values and annual interest for each instrument, including GICs, long term independent securitization
trusts and an independent funding trust, as well as annual payment obligations for Special Purpose Entities, mortgages and finance
lease obligations.
(2) Represents the minimum or base rents payable. Amounts are not offset by any expected sub-lease income.
(3) These obligations include agreements for the purchase of real property and capital commitments for construction, expansion and
renovation of buildings. These agreements may contain conditions that may or may not be satisfied. If the conditions are not
satisfied, it is possible the Company will no longer have the obligation to proceed with the underlying transactions.
(4) These include contractual obligations of a material amount to purchase goods or services where the contract prescribes fixed or
minimum volumes to be purchased or payments to be made within a fixed period of time for a set or variable price. These are only
estimates of anticipated financial commitments under these arrangements and the amount of actual payments will vary. The
purchase obligations do not include purchase orders issued or agreements made in the ordinary course of business which are solely
for goods that are meant for resale, nor do they include any contracts which may be terminated on relatively short notice or with
insignificant cost or liability to the Company. Also excluded are purchase obligations related to commodities or commodity-like goods
for which a market for resale exists.
As at year end 2012, the Company had additional long term liabilities which included post-employment and
other long term employee benefit plan liabilities, deferred vendor allowances, deferred income tax liabilities,
certain share-based compensation liabilities and provisions, including insurance liabilities. These long term
liabilities have not been included in the table above as the timing and amount of future payments are uncertain.
26 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
8.6
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into off-balance sheet arrangements including:
Letters of Credit
Standby and documentary letters of credit are used in connection with certain obligations mainly related to real
estate transactions, benefit programs, purchase orders and performance guarantees, securitization of PC Bank's
credit card receivables and third-party financing made available to Loblaw's independent franchisees. The
aggregate gross potential liability related to the Company's letters of credit, including the standby letters of
credit for the benefit of independent funding trusts and independent securitization trusts is discussed in
Section 8.2, “Sources of Liquidity”, is approximately $570 million (2011 – $540 million).
Guarantees
In addition to the letters of credit mentioned above, the Company has entered into various guarantee
agreements including obligations to indemnify third parties in connection with leases, business dispositions and
other transactions in the normal course of the Company's business. Additionally, Loblaw has provided a
guarantee on behalf of PC Bank to MasterCard® International Incorporated in the amount of U.S. $230 million
(2011 – U.S. $180 million) for accepting PC Bank as a card member and licensee of MasterCard®.
9.
OTHER BUSINESS MATTERS
IT and Other Systems Implementation
Loblaw is undertaking a major upgrade of its IT infrastructure that began in 2010. This project constitutes one of
the largest technology infrastructure programs ever implemented by Loblaw and is fundamental to its long term
growth strategies. During 2012, Loblaw continued to make progress on the implementation of the new IT system
and successfully achieved two of its key milestones – implementation at the first distribution centre and first
store with little to no impact to Loblaw's customers. In addition, in 2012, as part of the implementation process,
Loblaw added all of the supply chain master data to the system. This master data, including delivery schedules,
replenishment and costing information, now originates in the new system. In 2013, Loblaw will roll-out the IT
system to the remaining distribution centres and a portion of the store network.
Real Estate Investment Trust
In December 2012, Loblaw announced its intention to create a REIT, which will acquire a significant portion of
Loblaw's real estate assets and sell units by way of an IPO. The IPO of the REIT is expected to be completed by
mid 2013, subject to prevailing market conditions and receipt of required regulatory approvals, including
approval to list the units on the TSX.
Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) and Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) Plans
Subsequent to year end 2012, both GWL and Loblaw's RSU and PSU plans were amended to require settlement
in shares rather than in cash. Trusts have been established to facilitate the purchase of shares for future
settlement for each of the RSU and PSU plans upon vesting. These trusts will be consolidated by the Company.
Subsequent to the end of 2012, GWL paid $29 million to settle its remaining equity swap contract representing
800,000 GWL common shares, which GWL purchased under its NCIB for $57 million. Of the 800,000 common
shares purchased, 580,000 common shares were cancelled and the remaining 220,000 common shares were
placed into trusts for future settlement of GWL's RSUs and PSUs. Subsequent to the end of 2012, Glenhuron paid
$16 million to settle its remaining equity forward contract representing 1,103,500 Loblaw common shares, which
Loblaw purchased under its NCIB for $46 million, and placed into trusts for future settlement of Loblaw's RSUs
and PSUs.
Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Plan Changes
Subsequent to year end 2012, the Company announced changes to certain of its defined benefit pension and
post-employment benefit plans impacting certain employees retiring after January 1, 2015. These changes are
expected to result in a one-time gain of approximately $51 million, which will be recorded in the first quarter
of 2013.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 27
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
10.
The 52-week reporting cycle is divided into four quarters of 12 weeks each except for the third quarter, which is
16 weeks in duration. The following is a summary of selected consolidated financial information derived from the
Company's unaudited interim period condensed consolidated financial statements for each of the eight most
recently completed quarters.
10.1 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Net earnings attributable to
shareholders of the Company
Net earnings per common share ($)
Basic
Diluted
Third
Quarter
Second
Quarter
First
Quarter
Total
(audited)
2012 $ 7,224 $ 7,627 $ 10,164 $ 7,727 $ 32,742
2011 $ 7,148 $ 7,531 $ 10,061 $ 7,636 $ 32,376
486
2012 $
635
2011 $
65 $
109 $
160 $
264 $
137 $
157 $
124 $
105 $
Fourth
Quarter
2012 $
2011 $
2012 $
2011 $
0.89 $
0.74 $
0.89 $
0.71 $
0.99 $
1.13 $
0.98 $
1.08 $
1.14 $
1.94 $
1.07 $
1.93 $
0.43 $
0.77 $
0.34 $
0.72 $
3.45
4.58
3.38
4.55
Results by Quarter
Consolidated quarterly sales for the last eight quarters were impacted by the following significant items: foreign
currency exchange rates, seasonality and the timing of holidays.
Loblaw's average quarterly internal retail food price inflation for 2012 and 2011 remained lower than the
average quarterly national retail food price inflation as measured by CPI. CPI does not necessarily reflect the
effect of inflation on the specific mix of goods sold in Loblaw stores.
In the last eight quarters, Loblaw's net retail square footage increased by 0.8 million square feet to 51.5 million
square feet.
Weston Foods 2012 quarterly sales were positively impacted by foreign currency translation in the first, second
and third quarters, and negatively impacted in the fourth quarter of 2012 when compared to the same periods in
2011. Excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, quarterly sales were negatively impacted by lower
volumes in all four quarters, with positive pricing offsetting the lower volumes in the first quarter, and partially
offsetting the lower volumes in the second, third and fourth quarters. The loss of distributed product impacted
sales in the second, third and fourth quarters, with the majority of these declines occurring in the fourth quarter
of 2012.
Over the last eight quarters, the Company's consolidated operating income has improved and was impacted by a
number of items as outlined in Section 6.2, “Selected Annual Information” of this MD&A.
At Loblaw, fluctuations in quarterly operating income during 2012 reflect the underlying operations of Loblaw
and were impacted by incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain, costs related to the
transition of certain Ontario conventional stores to the more cost effective and efficient operating terms under
collective agreements ratified in 2010, start up costs associated with the launch of the Joe Fresh brand in the
United States and fixed asset impairment charges net of recoveries. Quarterly operating income is also impacted
by seasonality and the timing of holidays.
At Weston Foods, quarterly operating income during 2012 was positively impacted by the benefits realized from
productivity improvements and cost reduction initiatives and higher pricing in certain product categories,
partially offset by lower sales volumes. In addition, commodity and other input costs were higher in the first half
of 2012 and lower in the second half compared to the same periods in 2011.
28 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
10.2
The following is a summary of selected unaudited consolidated financial information for the fourth quarter. The
analysis of the data contained in the table focuses on the results of operations and changes in the financial
condition and cash flows in the fourth quarter.
Selected Consolidated Information
(unaudited)
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Income taxes
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company
Net earnings
Basic net earnings per common share ($)
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share ($) (1)
Cash flows from (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Free cash flow
Dividends declared per share type ($):
Common shares
Preferred shares – Series I
Preferred shares – Series III
Preferred shares – Series IV
Preferred shares – Series V
Quarters Ended
$
Dec. 31, 2012
7,727
$
320
$
382
$
4.9%
583
7.5%
170
34
65
116
0.43
1.02
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Dec. 31, 2011
7,636
$
352
$
373
$
4.9%
558
7.3%
108
71
109
173
0.77
1.01
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
680
(94)
(68)
514
0.38
0.36
0.33
0.33
0.30
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
669
(469)
(225)
497
0.36
0.36
0.33
0.33
0.30
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1) in the fourth quarter of 2012 increased to $1.02 compared to
$1.01 in the same period in 2011, an increase of $0.01 or 1.0%. The increase in the fourth quarter of 2012 was
due to an improvement in the operating performance of the Company's two operating segments, Weston Foods
and Loblaw, partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate(2) compared to the same period in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2) Effective income tax rate excludes the tax impact of items excluded from adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1).
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 29
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The Company's basic net earnings per common share were $0.43 compared to $0.77 in the same period in 2011,
a decrease of $0.34. This decrease includes the year-over-year unfavourable net impact of certain items,
primarily the impact of the forward sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares and restructuring and
other charges, partially offset by the impact of certain foreign currency translation which are excluded from
adjusted basic net earnings per common share(1). In the fourth quarter of 2012, restructuring and other charges
included a charge of $61 million associated with a plan that reduced approximately 700 head office and
administrative positions at Loblaw.
Sales
Sales in the fourth quarter of 2012 were $7.7 billion compared to $7.6 billion for the same period in 2011, an
increase of 1.2%.
Consolidated sales for the fourth quarter of 2012 were impacted by each reportable operating segment when
compared to the same period in 2011 as follows:
• Negatively by 0.1% due to the sales decline of 2.7% at Weston Foods. The loss of certain frozen distributed
products negatively impacted sales growth and volume by approximately 2.3% and 1.0%, respectively, and
foreign currency translation negatively impacted sales growth by approximately 1.3%. Excluding these
impacts, sales increased 0.9% due to the positive impact of pricing and changes in sales mix across certain
product categories of 1.9%, partially offset by a decrease in volume of 1.0%.
• Positively by 1.2% due to the sales growth of 1.2% at Loblaw. Same-store sales were flat (2011 – growth of
2.5%), with an extra day of store operations having a positive impact on 2011 same-store sales estimated to
be between 0.8% and 1.0%. Sales growth in both food and drugstore were modest, sales growth in gas bar
was moderate, sales in general merchandise, excluding apparel, declined moderately and sales in apparel
were flat. Loblaw's average quarterly internal food price index was flat during the fourth quarter of 2012
(2011 – moderate inflation), which was lower than the average quarterly national food price inflation of 1.5%
(2011 – 5.2%) as measured by CPI. In the last 12 months, Loblaw opened 18 corporate and franchise stores
and closed 11 corporate and franchise stores, resulting in a net increase of 0.3 million square feet, or 0.6%.
Loblaw sales in the fourth quarter of 2012 were also positively impacted by an increase in Financial Services
segment revenue.
Operating Income
Operating income in the fourth quarter of 2012 was $320 million compared to $352 million in the same period in
2011. Consolidated operating income in the fourth quarter of 2012 was negatively impacted by restructuring and
other charges, including a charge of $61 million related to the reduction in head office and administrative
positions recorded by Loblaw and a MEPP withdrawal liability of $17 million incurred by Weston Foods, partially
offset by the impact of certain foreign currency translation. Adjusted operating income(1) in the fourth quarter of
2012 was $382 million compared to $373 million in the same period in 2011, an increase of $9 million or 2.4%.
The Company's adjusted operating margin(1) was 4.9% in the fourth quarters of both 2012 and 2011.
The Company's fourth quarter year-over-year change in consolidated adjusted operating income(1) was impacted
by each of its reportable operating segments as follows:
• Positively by 0.3% due to an increase of 1.8% in adjusted operating income(1) at Weston Foods. Adjusted
operating income(1) was positively impacted by higher pricing in certain product categories, the benefits
realized from productivity improvements and other cost reduction initiatives and lower commodity and
other input costs, which were partially offset by lower sales volumes in the fourth quarter of 2012, when
compared to the same period in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
30 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
• Positively by 2.1% due to an increase of 2.5% in adjusted operating income(1) at Loblaw. The increases in
adjusted operating income(1) and adjusted operating margin(1) were mainly attributable to the improvement
in operating performance of Loblaw's Financial Services segment, partially offset by the decline in operating
performance of Loblaw's Retail segment. This decrease was driven by incremental costs related to
investments in IT and supply chain(2), foreign exchange losses, higher fixed asset impairment charges net of
recoveries and higher labour costs, partially offset by other operating cost efficiencies, lower costs related to
the transition of certain Ontario conventional stores to the more cost effective and efficient operating terms
of collective agreements ratified in the fourth quarter of 2010 and an increase in gross profit. Increased
labour costs included an estimated $5 million of incremental investments in Loblaw's customer proposition
that were not covered by operations. Incremental investments in shrink related to improved assortment in
stores also partially offset the increase in gross profit by an estimated $10 million. Included in fourth quarter
2011 operating income were start up costs associated with the launch of Loblaw's Joe Fresh brand in the
United States.
The Company's consolidated adjusted EBITDA margin(1) for the fourth quarter of 2012 increased to 7.5% from
7.3% in the same period in 2011. The margin was positively impacted by both Weston Foods and Loblaw when
compared to the same period in 2011.
Net Interest Expense and Other Financing Charges
Net interest expense and other financing charges in the fourth quarter of 2012 increased by $62 million to
$170 million compared to the same period in 2011, due to the fair value adjustment of the forward sale
agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares.
Excluding the impact of this fair value adjustment, net interest expense and other financing charges in the fourth
quarter of 2012 was flat when compared to the same period in 2011.
Income Taxes
The fourth quarter 2012 effective income tax rate decreased to 22.7% from 29.1% in the same period in 2011.
The decrease in the effective income tax rate when compared to 2011 was primarily due to further reductions in
the federal and Ontario statutory income tax rates, a change in the proportion of taxable income earned across
different tax jurisdictions and non-taxable foreign currency translation gains recorded in 2012 (2011 –
non-deductible foreign currency translation losses), partially offset by the reversal of previously recognized
current tax assets. The Company (excluding Loblaw) expensed current tax assets of $8 million in the fourth
quarter of 2012 due to amendments to the Income Tax Act relating to the taxation of Canadian corporations with
foreign affiliates.
Net Earnings Attributable to Shareholders of the Company
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company for the fourth quarter of 2012 were $65 million
compared to $109 million and basic net earnings per common share were $0.43 compared to $0.77 in the same
period in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2)
Incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain include IT costs, depreciation and amortization and supply chain
project costs.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 31
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Reportable Operating Segments
The Company's consolidated sales and operating income were impacted by each of its reportable operating
segments as follows:
WESTON FOODS
(unaudited)
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Quarters Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
399
$
42
$
57
$
14.3%
71
17.8%
$
Dec. 31, 2011
410
$
57
$
56
$
13.7%
71
17.3%
$
For the fourth quarter of 2012, Weston Foods sales of $399 million decreased 2.7% and volumes decreased 2.0%
when compared to the same period in 2011. The loss of certain frozen distributed products that Weston Foods
distributed on behalf of certain customers in 2012 negatively impacted sales growth and volume by
approximately 2.3% and 1.0%, respectively, and foreign currency translation negatively impacted sales growth by
approximately 1.3%. Excluding the impact of the loss of certain distributed product and foreign currency
translation, sales increased 0.9% due to the positive impact of pricing and changes in sales mix across certain
product categories of 1.9%, partially offset by a decrease in volume of 1.0%.
The following sales analysis excludes the impact of foreign currency translation. In the fourth quarter of 2012:
•
fresh bakery sales decreased by approximately 2.7% mainly driven by lower sales volumes. The introduction
of new products, such as Country Harvest Cranberry Muesli and Flax and Quinoa breads, D'Italiano Brizzolio
rolls and Gadoua Pain de Ménage, contributed positively to branded sales. In addition, in the fourth quarter
of 2012, Weston Foods launched private label gluten free bread and sweet goods and the Flat Oven Bakery
line of international flatbreads;
frozen bakery sales decreased by approximately 3.6% and were negatively impacted by the loss of certain
distributed products. Excluding the effects of the loss of these distributed products, frozen bakery sales
increased by approximately 0.5%; and
•
• biscuit sales, principally wafers, ice-cream cones, cookies and crackers, increased by approximately 11.3%
mainly due to higher volumes combined with the positive impact of pricing and changes in sales mix.
Volumes increased in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 due to growth in
cookie sales, partially offset by lower cone sales. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2012, Weston Foods
started manufacturing and selling Mrs. Fields® branded pre-packaged cookies under license, which
contributed positively to the sales growth in cookies.
Weston Foods operating income was $42 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to $57 million in the
same period in 2011. The decrease was mainly due to the accrual of an incremental MEPP withdrawal liability,
the change in the fair value adjustment of commodity derivatives, and the impact of a post-retirement plan
change which had a combined year-over-year unfavourable net impact of $22 million, partially offset by an
improvement in adjusted operating income(1) of $1 million as described below.
Adjusted operating income(1) increased by $1 million, or 1.8%, to $57 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 from
$56 million in the same period in 2011. Adjusted operating margin(1) was 14.3% for the fourth quarter of 2012
compared to 13.7% in the same period in 2011.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
32 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Gross margin, excluding the impact of the commodity derivatives fair value adjustment, increased in the fourth
quarter of 2012 compared to the same period in 2011.
Adjusted operating income(1) in the fourth quarter of 2012 was positively impacted by higher pricing in certain
product categories, the benefits realized from productivity improvements and other cost reduction initiatives,
and lower commodity and other input costs, which were partially offset by lower sales volumes in the fourth
quarter of 2012, when compared to the same period in 2011.
Weston Foods continuously evaluates strategic and cost reduction initiatives related to its manufacturing assets,
distribution networks and administrative infrastructure with the objective of ensuring a low cost operating
structure. Restructuring activities related to these initiatives are ongoing and in the fourth quarter of 2012,
charges of $3 million (2011 – $5 million) were recorded in operating income.
Adjusted EBITDA(1) was $71 million in the fourth quarters of both 2012 and 2011. Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
increased in the fourth quarter of 2012 to 17.8% from 17.3% in the same period in 2011.
LOBLAW
(unaudited)
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(1)
Adjusted operating margin(1)
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Adjusted EBITDA margin(1)
Quarters Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
7,465
$
260
$
325
$
4.4%
512
6.9%
$
Dec. 31, 2011
7,373
$
313
$
317
$
4.3%
487
6.6%
$
Loblaw sales in the fourth quarter of 2012 increased by 1.2% to $7.5 billion compared to $7.4 billion in the same
period in 2011. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the increase in retail sales compared to the same period in 2011
was impacted by the following factors:
•
same-store sales were flat (2011 – growth of 2.5%), with an extra day of store operations having a positive
impact on 2011 same-store sales estimated to be between 0.8% and 1.0%;
sales growth in both food and drugstore were modest;
sales growth in gas bar was moderate;
sales in general merchandise, excluding apparel, declined moderately;
sales in apparel were flat;
Loblaw's average quarterly internal food price index was flat during the fourth quarter of 2012 (2011 –
moderate inflation), which was lower than the average quarterly national food price inflation of 1.5%
(2011 – 5.2%) as measured by CPI. CPI does not necessarily reflect the effect of inflation on the specific mix
of goods sold in Loblaw stores; and
•
•
•
•
•
• 18 corporate and franchise stores were opened and 11 corporate and franchise stores were closed in the last
12 months, resulting in a net increase of 0.3 million square feet, or 0.6%.
Loblaw sales in the fourth quarter of 2012 were also positively impacted by an increase in Financial Services
segment revenue of $29 million, or 19.7%, compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was driven by
higher PC Telecom revenues resulting from the 2011 launch of the Mobile Shop kiosk business and higher
interest and interchange fee income as a result of higher credit card transaction values and increased credit card
receivable balances.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 33
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Loblaw operating income decreased by $53 million to $260 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to
$313 million in the same period in 2011. The decrease was mainly due to restructuring and other charges
including $61 million associated with the reduction in head office and administrative positions, partially offset by
an improvement in adjusted operating income(1) of $8 million as described below.
Loblaw adjusted operating income(1) increased by $8 million to $325 million in the fourth quarter of 2012
compared to $317 million in the same period in 2011. Adjusted operating margin(1) was 4.4% compared to 4.3%
in the same period in 2011. Financial Services segment operating income increased by $16 million, partially
offset by an $8 million decline in Retail segment adjusted operating income(1).
Gross profit generated by Loblaw's Retail segment increased by $6 million to $1,575 million in the fourth quarter
of 2012 compared to $1,569 million in the same period in 2011 and gross profit percentage was 21.6%, a
decrease from 21.7% in the same period in 2011. This decline in gross profit percentage was primarily driven by
investments in food margins and increased shrink, partially offset by margin improvements in drugstore and
general merchandise and decreased transportation costs. The $6 million increase in gross profit was primarily
driven by higher sales, partially offset by investments in gross profit percentage. Increased shrink expense
included an estimated $10 million of the incremental investment in Loblaw's customer proposition related to
improved assortment in stores that was not covered by operations.
The increase in adjusted operating income(1) and adjusted operating margin(1) in the fourth quarter of 2012
compared to the same period in 2011 were attributable to an increase in Loblaw's Financial Services segment,
offset by a decrease in Loblaw's Retail segment. The increase in Loblaw's Financial Services segment was mainly
attributable to higher revenue and lower costs related to the renegotiation of vendor contracts, partially offset
by investments in the launch of PC Telecom's Mobile Shop kiosk business and a higher allowance for credit card
receivables on higher receivables balances. The decrease in Loblaw's Retail segment was attributable to charges
of $17 million (2011 – $5 million) for fixed asset impairments net of recoveries, incremental costs of $17 million
related to investments in IT and supply chain(2), foreign exchange losses, and increased labour costs, partially
offset by lower costs of $5 million (2011 – $23 million) related to the transition of certain Ontario conventional
stores to the more cost effective and efficient operating terms of collective agreements ratified in the fourth
quarter of 2010, other operating cost efficiencies and an increase in gross profit. Increased labour costs included
an estimated $5 million of the incremental investment in Loblaw's customer proposition related to improved
service in the stores that was not covered by operations. In the fourth quarter of 2011, start up costs of
$16 million associated with the launch of Loblaw's Joe Fresh brand in the U.S. were incurred.
During the fourth quarter of 2012, restructuring charges of $61 million associated with the reduction in head
office and administrative positions were recorded in operating income and other charges of $2 million
(2011 – nil) were recorded in operating income related to changes in Loblaw's distribution network.
Adjusted EBITDA(1) increased $25 million, or 5.1%, to $512 million in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to
$487 million in the same period in 2011. Adjusted EBITDA margin(1) increased in the fourth quarter of 2012 to
6.9% compared to 6.6% in the same period in 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash flows from operating activities The Company's fourth quarter 2012 cash flows from operating activities
were $680 million compared to $669 million in the same period in 2011. The increase when compared to the
same period in 2011 was primarily due to changes in non-cash working capital, partially offset by the
year-over-year decrease in net earnings before non-cash items and an increase in credit card receivables.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2)
Incremental costs related to investments in IT and supply chain include IT costs, depreciation and amortization and supply chain
project costs.
34 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Cash flows used in investing activities The Company's fourth quarter 2012 cash flows used in investing activities
were $94 million compared to $469 million in the same period in 2011. The decrease when compared to the
same period in 2011 was primarily due to the change in short term investments and security deposits, including
$125 million of cash collateralized for letter of credit facilities in 2011, and higher proceeds from fixed assets
sales. Capital expenditures for the fourth quarter of 2012 were $398 million (2011 – $362 million).
Cash flows used in financing activities The Company's fourth quarter 2012 cash flows used in financing
activities were $68 million compared to $225 million in the same period in 2011. The decrease when compared
to the same period in 2011 was primarily due to lower purchases of common shares for cancellation and higher
net issuances of long term debt in the fourth quarter of 2012 as detailed below.
During the fourth quarter of 2012, GWL and Loblaw completed the following financing activities:
• GWL issued $10 million of Series B Debentures;
• GWL issued 34,030 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of $2 million;
• GWL purchased for cancellation 4,297 common shares for a nominal amount;
•
•
• PC Bank issued $61 million of GICs; and
• PC Bank repaid $2 million in GICs.
Loblaw issued 474,747 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of $15 million;
Loblaw purchased for cancellation 246,228 common shares for $10 million;
During the fourth quarter of 2011, GWL and Loblaw completed the following financing activities:
• GWL issued $350 million of unsecured 3.78% MTN, Series 2-A;
• GWL repaid $300 million of 6.45% MTN;
• GWL issued $10 million of Series B Debentures;
• GWL issued 1,881 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of a nominal
amount;
Loblaw issued 54,908 common shares on the exercise of stock options for cash consideration of $2 million;
Loblaw purchased for cancellation 415,719 common shares for $17 million;
• GWL purchased for cancellation 887,515 common shares for $60 million;
•
•
• PC Bank issued $3 million of GICs; and
• PC Bank repaid $2 million in GICs.
Free Cash Flow(1)
In the fourth quarter of 2012, free cash flow(1) of $514 million increased by $17 million compared to $497 million
in 2011. This increase was primarily driven by the change in cash flows from operating activities, excluding the
net increase in credit card receivables as described above, partially offset by an increase in the Company's capital
investment program.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
11.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures to
provide reasonable assurance that all material information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries is
gathered and reported to senior management on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made
regarding public disclosure.
As required by National Instrument 52-109, “Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim
Filings” (“NI 51-109”), the Executive Chairman, as Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer have caused
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures to be evaluated. Based on that evaluation, they have
concluded that the design and operation of the system of disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at
December 31, 2012.
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 35
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
12.
Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial
reporting to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS.
As required by NI 52-109, the Executive Chairman, as Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer have
caused the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting to be evaluated using the framework
established in the “Internal Control – Integrated Framework (COSO Framework) published by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)”. Based on that evaluation, they have concluded
that the design and operation of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting were effective as at
December 31, 2012.
It should be recognized that due to inherent limitations, any controls, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluations of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Additionally, management is required to use
judgment in evaluating controls and procedures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Loblaw successfully implemented the IT system in the fourth quarter of 2012 at one distribution centre and at
one store. These implementations resulted in changes to Loblaw's internal controls over financial reporting
during the fourth quarter of 2012 impacting the store, the distribution centre and a significant number of
legacy corporate, franchise, and affiliate stores that the distribution centre services. The changes in controls
have materially affected Loblaw's internal controls over financial reporting impacting the following key areas:
(1) Accounts Payable, (2) Cash Management, (3) Order Processing and Billing, (4) Vendor Income, (5) Costing,
(6) Inventory Management and Valuation, and (7) Credit Management. Except for the preceding changes, there
were no other changes to the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of
2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.
ENTERPRISE RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
13.
The Company is committed to establishing a framework that ensures risk management is an integral part of its
activities. To ensure the continued growth and success of the Company, risks are identified and managed
through GWL's and Loblaw's Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) programs. The GWL and Loblaw Boards,
respectively, have approved an ERM policy and oversee the ERM program through approval of the Company's
risks and risk prioritization. The ERM program assists all areas of the business in managing appropriate levels of
risk tolerance by bringing a systematic approach, methodology and tools for evaluating, measuring and
monitoring key risks. The results of the ERM program and other business planning processes are used to identify
emerging risks to the Company, prioritize risk management activities and develop a risk-based internal audit
plan.
Risks are not eliminated through the ERM program. Risks are identified and managed within understood risk
tolerances. The ERM program is designed to:
• promote a culture of awareness of risk management and compliance within the Company;
•
facilitate corporate governance by providing a consolidated view of risks across the Company and insight into
the methodologies for identification, assessment, measurement and monitoring of the risks;
• assist in developing consistent risk management methodologies and tools across the organization; and
• enable the Company to focus on its key risks in the business planning process and reduce harm to financial
performance through responsible risk management.
36 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Risk identification and assessments are important elements of the Company's ERM framework. An annual ERM
assessment is completed to assist in the update and identification of internal and external risks, which are both
strategic and operational in nature. Key risks affecting the Company are prioritized under five categories:
financial; operational; regulatory; human capital; and reputational risks. The annual ERM assessment is carried
out through interviews, surveys and facilitated workshops with management and the GWL or Loblaw Boards.
Risks are assessed and evaluated based on the Company's vulnerability to the risk and the potential impact that
the underlying risks would have on the Company's ability to execute its strategies and achieve its objectives. Risk
owners are assigned relevant risks and key risk indicators are developed. At least semi-annually, management
provides an update to a Committee of the GWL or Loblaw Boards of the status of the top risks based on
significant changes from the prior update, anticipated impacts in future quarters and significant changes in key
risk indicators. In addition, the long term (three to five year) risk level is assessed to monitor potential long term
risk impacts, which may assist in risk mitigation planning activities.
Accountability for oversight of the management of each risk is allocated by the GWL or Loblaw Boards either to
the full Boards or to Committees of the Boards.
The operating, financial, regulatory, human capital and reputational risks and risk management strategies are
discussed below. Any of these risks has the potential to negatively affect the Company and its financial
performance. The Company has risk management strategies, including insurance programs, that are intended to
mitigate the potential impact of these risks. However, these strategies do not guarantee that the associated risks
will be mitigated or will not materialize or that events or circumstances will not occur that could negatively affect
the reputation, operations or financial condition or performance of the Company.
13.1 OPERATING RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Operating Risks
The following is a summary of the Company's key operating risks which are discussed in detail below:
Systems Implementations
Execution of Strategic Initiatives
Information Integrity and Reliability
Availability, Access and Security of
Information Technology
Change Management and Process Execution
Food Safety and Public Health
Competitive Environment
Economic Environment
Merchandising
Distribution and Supply Chain
Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
Real Estate Investment Trust Initial
Public Offering
Employee Retention and Succession Planning
Labour Relations
Regulatory and Tax
Privacy and Information Security
Commodity Prices
Franchisee and Independent Business Relationships
Inventory Management
Vendor Management and Third-Party
Service Providers
Environmental
Trademark and Brand Protection
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 37
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Systems Implementations
Loblaw continues to undertake a major upgrade of its IT infrastructure. Completing the IT system deployment
will require continued focus and investment. Failure to successfully migrate from legacy systems to the IT system
or disruption in Loblaw's current IT systems during the implementation of the new systems, could result in a lack
of accurate data to enable management to effectively achieve its strategic plan or manage the day-to-day
operations of the business, causing significant disruptions to the business and potential financial losses. Failure
to implement appropriate processes to support the IT system could result in inefficiencies and duplication in
processes and could negatively affect Loblaw's reputation and the operations, revenues and financial
performance of the Company.
Execution of Strategic Initiatives
The Company undertakes from time to time acquisitions and dispositions that meet its strategic objectives. The
Company holds significant cash and short term investments and is continuing to evaluate strategic opportunities
for the use or deployment of these funds. The use or deployment of the funds and the execution of the
Company's capital plans could pose a risk if they do not align with the Company's strategic objectives or if the
Company experiences integration difficulties on the acquisition of any businesses. In addition, the Company may
not be able to realize upon the synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects expected from any such
investment opportunities or from the execution of the Company's strategies. Finally, any acquisition or
divestiture activities may present unanticipated costs and managerial and operation risks, including the diversion
of management's time and attention from day-to-day activities. If the Company's strategies are not effectively
developed and executed, it could negatively affect the reputation, operations and financial performance of the
Company.
Information Integrity and Reliability
Management depends on relevant, reliable and accessible information for decision making purposes, including
key performance indicators and financial reporting. Lack of relevant, reliable and accessible information that
enables management to effectively manage the business could preclude the Company from optimizing its overall
performance. Any significant loss of data or failure to maintain reliable data could negatively affect the
reputation, operations and financial performance of the Company.
Availability, Access and Security of Information Technology
The Company is reliant on the continuous and uninterrupted operations of information technology systems.
Point of sale availability, 24/7 user access, and security of all IT systems are critical elements to the operations of
the Company. Any IT failure pertaining to availability, access or system security could result in disruption for the
customer, lost revenue and could negatively impact the reputation, operations, and financial performance of
the Company.
Change Management and Process Execution
Significant initiatives within the Company, including the execution of Loblaw's IT infrastructure plan, are
underway. Ineffective change management could result in disruptions to the operations of the business or affect
the ability of the Company to implement and achieve its long term strategic objectives. Failure to properly
integrate several large, complex initiatives in a timely manner will adversely impact the operations of the
Company. If employees are not able to develop and perform new roles, processes and disciplines, the Company
may not achieve the expected cost savings and other benefits of its initiatives. Failure to properly execute the
various processes could increase the risk of customer dissatisfaction, which in turn could negatively affect the
reputation, operations and financial performance of the Company.
38 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Food Safety and Public Health
The Company is subject to risks associated with food safety and general merchandise product defects. These
risks could arise as part of the design, procurement, production, packaging, storage, distribution, preparation
and display of products, including the Company's control brand products and contract manufactured products.
The Company could be adversely affected in the event of a significant outbreak of food-borne illness or other
public health concerns related to food products. The occurrence of such events or incidents could result in harm
to the Company's customers, negative publicity or damage to the Company's brands and could lead to
unforeseen liabilities from legal claims or otherwise. In addition, failure to trace or locate any contaminated or
defective products and ingredients could affect the Company's ability to be effective in a recall situation. Any of
these events, as well as the failure to maintain the cleanliness and health standards at Loblaw's store level, could
negatively affect the reputation, operations and financial performance of the Company.
Incident management processes are in place to manage such events, should they occur. The existence of these
procedures does not mean that the Company will, in all circumstances, be able to mitigate the underlying risks,
and any event related to these matters has the potential to negatively affect the reputation, operations and
financial performance of the Company.
Competitive Environment
Weston Foods' competitors include multi-national food processing companies, as well as national and
smaller-scale bakery operations in Canada and the U.S.
Loblaw's competitors include traditional supermarket operators, as well as mass merchandisers, warehouse
clubs, drugstores, limited assortment stores, discount stores, convenience stores and specialty stores. Many of
these competitors now offer a selection of food, drugstore and general merchandise. Others remain focused on
supermarket-type merchandise. Loblaw is subject to competitive pressures from new entrants into the
marketplace and from the expansion or renovation of existing competitors, particularly those expanding into the
grocery market.
The Company's inability to effectively predict market activity or compete effectively with its current or future
competitors could result in, among other things, reduced market share and lower pricing in response to its
competitors' pricing activities. Failure by Weston Foods or Loblaw to sustain their competitive position could
negatively affect the financial performance of the Company.
Economic Environment
Economic factors that impact consumer spending patterns could deteriorate or remain unpredictable due to
global, national or regional economic volatility. These factors include high levels of unemployment and
household debt, increased interest rates, inflation, foreign exchange rates, and commodity prices and access to
consumer credit. Any of these factors could negatively affect the Company's revenue and margins. Inflationary
trends are unpredictable and changes in the rate of inflation or deflation will affect consumer prices, which in
turn could negatively affect the financial performance of the Company.
Merchandising
The Company could have goods and services that customers do not want or need, are not reflective of current
trends in customers' tastes, habits, or regional preferences, are priced at a level customers are not willing to pay
or are late in reaching the market. Innovation is critical if the Company is to respond to customer demands and
stay competitive in the market place. If merchandising efforts are not effective or responsive to customer
demand, the operations and financial performance of the Company could be negatively affected.
Distribution and Supply Chain
Failure to continue to invest in and improve the Company's supply chain could adversely affect the Company's
capacity to effectively and efficiently attract and retain current and potential customers. Any delay or disruption
in the flow of goods to stores could negatively affect the operations and financial performance of the Company.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 39
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
The Company's ability to continue critical operations and processes could be negatively impacted by adverse
events resulting from various incidents, including severe weather, work stoppages, prolonged IT failure, power
failures, border closures, a pandemic or other national or international catastrophe. The Company has an
enterprise wide business continuity program which reduces, but does not completely mitigate, the risk of
business interruptions, crises or potential disasters, which could negatively affect the reputation, operations and
financial performance of the Company.
Real Estate Investment Trust Initial Public Offering
During the fourth quarter of 2012, Loblaw announced its intention to create a REIT to acquire a significant
portion of Loblaw's real estate assets and for the REIT to sell trust units to the public by way of an IPO. Loblaw
estimates that it will initially sell to the REIT real estate with a current market value exceeding $7 billion and it
intends to retain a significant majority interest in the REIT. Loblaw expects the IPO to be completed in mid 2013.
However, completion of the IPO and the purchase of certain of Loblaw's real estate assets will be subject to
prevailing market conditions and receipt of required regulatory approvals, including approval to list the trust
units on the TSX. In addition, the execution and implementation of the REIT's IPO will have a significant impact
on Loblaw's management and operations as a result of the time and attention required of management to
complete the offering. Failure to properly execute and implement the REIT's IPO could adversely affect the
reputation, operations and financial performance of the Company.
Employee Retention and Succession Planning
Effective succession planning for senior management and employee retention are essential to sustaining the
growth and success of the Company. In addition, loss of talent to the competition can be a significant risk to the
Company's business strategy. If the Company is not effective in establishing appropriate succession planning
processes and retention strategies, it could lead to a lack of requisite knowledge, skills and experience on the
part of management. This, in turn, could adversely affect the Company's ability to execute its strategies, and
negatively affect its reputation, operations and financial performance.
Labour Relations
A majority of the Company's workforce is unionized. Failure to renegotiate collective agreements could result in
work stoppages or slowdowns, which could negatively affect the Company's financial performance, depending
on their nature and duration. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of these negotiations or the timing of
their completion. Although the Company attempts to mitigate work stoppages and disputes through early
negotiations, work stoppages or slowdowns remain possible, which could negatively affect the reputation,
operations and financial performance of the Company.
Regulatory and Tax
Changes to any of the laws, rules, regulations or policies applicable to the Company's business, including income,
commodity and other taxes, and the production, processing, preparation, distribution, packaging and labelling of
products, could have an adverse impact on the Company's financial or operational performance. New accounting
pronouncements introduced by appropriate authoritative bodies could also impact the Company's financial
results. In the course of complying with such changes, the Company could incur significant costs. Changing
regulations or enhanced enforcement of existing regulations could restrict the Company's operations or
profitability and thereby threaten the Company's competitive position and capacity to efficiently conduct
business. Failure by the Company to comply with applicable laws, rules, regulations, orders and policies or
comply with orders for records in a timely manner could subject it to civil or regulatory actions or proceedings,
including fines, assessments, injunctions, recalls or seizures, which in turn could have an adverse effect on the
Company's financial results. PC Bank operates in a highly regulated environment and a failure by it to comply,
understand, acknowledge and effectively respond to the regulators could result in monetary penalties,
regulatory intervention and reputational damage.
40 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
The Company is involved in and potentially subject to tax audits from various governments and regulatory
agencies relating to income, capital and commodity taxes on an ongoing basis. As a result, from time to time,
taxing authorities may disagree with the positions and conclusions taken by the Company in its tax filings or
legislation may be amended, which could lead to assessments and reassessments. These assessments and
reassessments may have a material impact on the Company's financial statements in future periods. During
2012, Loblaw received indication from the CRA that it intends to proceed with a reassessment with regard to the
tax treatment of Loblaw's wholly owned subsidiary, Glenhuron. At this early stage, it is not possible to quantify
the amount of the proposed reassessment. Although Loblaw does not expect the ultimate outcome to be
material, such matters cannot be predicted with certainty and could result in a material charge in future periods.
During 2012, the majority of provincial governments announced or enacted amendments to the regulation of
generic prescription drug prices paid by provincial governments pursuant to public drug benefit plans.
Subsequent to year end 2012, all provinces and territories with the exception of Quebec, announced that
reimbursement rates on six common generic prescription drugs would be significantly reduced. All provinces
have now announced various forms of amendments to regulation of generic drug pricing. Under these
amendments, the prices paid by the provincial drug plans for generic drugs are being reduced. The amendments
also reduce out-of-pocket and private employer drug plan payments for generic drugs. The amendments impact
pharmacy sales and therefore could have an adverse effect on the financial performance of the Company. Loblaw
continues to identify opportunities to mitigate the impact of these amendments, including the introduction of
programs to add new services and enhance existing services to attract customers, but despite these efforts, the
amendments could have an adverse effect on the financial performance of the Company.
During 2010, GWL received a reassessment from the CRA challenging GWL's characterization of a gain reported
in a previous year's tax return filing. Should the CRA be successful in its assertion, the maximum exposure to the
Company's net earnings would be approximately $65 million. GWL is vigorously defending its filing position. No
amount has been provided for in the Company's financial statements.
Privacy and Information Security
The Company is subject to various laws regarding the protection of personal information of its customers,
cardholders and employees and has adopted a Privacy Policy setting out guidelines for the handling of personal
information. The Company's information systems contain personal information of customers, cardholders and
employees. Any failures or vulnerabilities in these security systems or non-compliance with regulations, including
those in relation to personal information belonging to the Company's customers and employees, could
negatively affect the reputation, operations and financial performance of the Company.
Commodity Prices
Weston Foods costs are directly impacted by fluctuations in the prices of commodity-linked raw materials such
as wheat flours, sugars, vegetable oils, cocoa powders and chocolate. Loblaw is also exposed to fluctuations in
the commodity prices as a result of the indirect link between commodities and the cost of consumer products. In
addition, both Weston Foods and Loblaw are exposed to increases in the prices of energy in operating, in the
case of Weston Foods, its bakeries and distribution networks, and, in the case of Loblaw, its stores and
distribution networks. Both Weston Foods and Loblaw use purchase commitments and derivative instruments in
the form of futures contracts, option contracts and forward contracts to manage their current and anticipated
exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices. Despite these strategies, high commodity prices could negatively
affect the financial performance of the Company.
Franchisee and Independent Business Relationships
A significant portion of the Loblaw's revenues and earnings arise from franchisee type relationships. Franchisees
and independent operators are independent businesses and, as such, their operations could be negatively
affected by factors beyond Loblaw's control, which in turn may negatively affect the reputation, operations and
financial performance of the Company. Revenues and earnings could also be negatively affected, and Loblaw's
reputation could be harmed, if a significant number of retail franchisees were to experience operational failures,
health and safety exposures or were unable to pay Loblaw for products, rent or fees. Loblaw's franchise system is
also subject to franchise legislation enacted by a number of provinces. Any new legislation or failure to comply
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 41
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
with existing legislation could negatively affect operations and could add administrative costs and burdens, any
of which could affect Loblaw's relationship with its franchisees and independent operators. Loblaw provides
various services to the franchisees to assist with management of store operations and dedicated personnel
manage Loblaw's obligations to its franchisees. These relationships with franchisees and independent operators
could pose significant risks if they are disrupted, which could negatively affect the reputation, operations and
financial performance of the Company. Supply chain or system changes by the Company could cause or be
perceived to cause disruptions to franchise operations and could result in negative effects on franchisee financial
performance. In addition, reputational damage or adverse consequences for Loblaw, including litigation and
disruption to revenue from franchise stores, could result.
Inventory Management
Inappropriate inventory management could lead to excess inventory or a shortage of inventory, which may
impact customer satisfaction and overall financial performance. Loblaw may experience excess inventory that
cannot be sold profitably or which could increase levels of inventory shrink. Loblaw focuses on reducing
inventory levels, early identification of inventory at risk and monitors the demand, forecasting and the impact of
customer trends. Despite these efforts, Loblaw could experience excess inventory that cannot be sold profitably,
which could negatively affect the operations and financial performance of the Company.
As part of its IT system upgrade implementation plan, Loblaw will be converting to a perpetual inventory system.
Through the conversion process, Loblaw will determine the value of its retail store inventories using weighted
average cost. As a result, valuation differences could arise which could negatively affect the carrying amount of
Loblaw's inventory.
Vendor Management and Third-Party Service Providers
Certain aspects of the Company's business rely on third-party providers, including offshore vendors, that provide
the Company with goods and services. Although contractual arrangements, sourcing guidelines, supplier audits
and Corporate Social Responsibility guidelines are in place, the Company has no direct influence over how the
vendors are managed. Negative events affecting any vendors or suppliers or inefficient, ineffective or incomplete
vendor management strategies, policies and/or procedures could adversely impact the Company's ability to
meet customer needs or control costs and quality, which could in turn negatively affect the reputation,
operations and financial performance of the Company.
The Company also uses third-party suppliers, carriers, logistic service providers and operators of warehouses and
distribution facilities including the product development, design and sourcing of Loblaw's control private apparel
products. Ineffective selection, contract terms or relationship management could impact the Company's ability
to source Weston Food's third-party manufactured products or Loblaw's control brand products, to have
products available for customers, to market to customers or to operate efficiently and effectively. The Company
maintains a strategy of multiple sources for logistics providers so that in the event of a disruption of service from
one supplier another supplier can be used. However, disruption in these services is possible, which could
interrupt the delivery of merchandise to stores, thereby negatively affecting the operations and financial
performance of the Company.
President's Choice Financial banking services are provided by a major Canadian chartered bank. PC Bank uses
third-party service providers to process credit card transactions, operate call centres and operationalize certain
risk management strategies for the President's Choice Financial MasterCard®. PC Bank and Loblaw actively
manage and monitor their relationships with all third-party service providers and PC Bank has an outsourcing
risk policy and a vendor governance team that provides regular reports on vendor governance and annual
vendor risk assessments. Despite these activities, a significant disruption in the services provided by the
chartered bank or by third-party service providers would negatively affect the financial performance of PC Bank
and the Company.
The Company relies on third parties for investment management, custody and other services for its cash
equivalents, short term investments, security deposits and pension assets. Any disruption in the services
provided by these suppliers could adversely affect the return on these assets or the liquidity of the Company.
42 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Environmental
The Company maintains a large portfolio of real estate and other facilities and is subject to environmental risks
associated with the contamination of such properties and facilities, whether by previous owners or occupants,
neighbouring properties or by the Company itself.
The Company has a number of underground storage tanks, the majority of which are used for the retailing of
automotive fuel or for its distribution and supply chain transport fleets. Contamination resulting from leaks from
these tanks is possible. The Company also operates refrigeration equipment in Weston Foods' production
facilities and in Loblaw's stores and distribution centres to preserve perishable products as they pass through the
supply chain and ultimately into the hands of the customer. These systems contain refrigerant gases which could
be released if the equipment fails or leaks. A release of these gases could have adverse effects on the
environment.
The Company is subject to legislation that imposes liabilities on retailers, brand owners and importers for costs
associated with recycling and disposal of consumer goods packaging and printed materials distributed to
customers. There is a risk that the Company will be subject to increased costs associated with these laws.
The Company has environmental management programs and has established assessment, compliance,
monitoring and reporting policies and procedures aimed at ensuring compliance with applicable environmental
legislative requirements and protecting the environment. Despite these mitigation activities, the Company could
be subject to increased or unexpected costs associated with environmental incidents and the related
remediation activities, including litigation and regulatory related costs, all of which could negatively affect the
reputation and financial performance of the Company.
Consumer trends are increasingly demanding that retailers sell products with less impact on the environment
and that their operations demonstrate environmentally responsible practices. As set out in its annual Corporate
Social Responsibility Report, Loblaw sets environmental goals and monitors its progress towards their
achievement. If the Company fails to meet consumer demand in this area or otherwise fails to adequately
address the environmental impact of its business practices, its reputation and financial performance could be
negatively affected.
Trademark and Brand Protection
A decrease in value of the Company's trademarks, banners or control brands, as a result of adverse events,
changes to the branding strategies or otherwise, could negatively impact the reputation, operations and financial
performance of the Company.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company manages the assets in its registered funded defined benefit pension plans by engaging
professional investment managers who operate under prescribed investment policies and procedures in respect
of permitted investments and asset allocations. Future contributions to the Company's registered funded
defined benefit pension plans are impacted by a number of variables, including the investment performance of
the plans' assets and the discount rate used to value the liabilities of the plans. The Company regularly monitors
and assesses plan performance and the impact of changes in participant demographics, changes in capital
markets and other economic factors that may impact funding requirements, net defined benefit costs and
actuarial assumptions. If capital market returns are below assumed levels, or if the discount rates do not
increase, the Company could be required to make contributions to its registered funded defined benefit pension
plans in excess of those currently expected, which in turn could negatively affect the financial performance of
the Company.
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
In addition to the Company-sponsored pension plans, the Company participates in various MEPPs, providing
pension benefits to union employees pursuant to provisions of collective bargaining agreements. Approximately
39% (2011 – 38%) of employees of the Company and of its independent franchisees participate in these plans.
The administration of these plans and the investment of their assets are controlled by a board of trustees
generally consisting of an equal number of union and employer representatives. In some circumstances, the
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 43
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Company has a representative on the board of trustees of these MEPPs. The Company's responsibility to make
contributions to these plans is limited by the amounts established pursuant to its collective agreements;
however, poor performance of these plans could have an adverse impact on the Company's employees and
former employees who are members of these plans or could result in changes to the terms and conditions of
participation in these plans, which could have a negative impact on the Company's results of operations or
financial condition.
Loblaw, together with its independent franchisees, is the largest participating employer in the Canadian
Commercial Workers Industry Pension Plan (“CCWIPP”), with approximately 54,000 (2011 – 53,000) employees
as members. In 2012, Loblaw contributed $52 million (2011 – $49 million) to CCWIPP. At the end of 2012 and
2011, the CCWIPP actuarial accrued benefit obligations greatly exceeded the value of the assets held in trust.
Further benefit reductions would negatively affect the retirement benefits of Loblaw's employees, which in turn
could negatively affect their morale and productivity and, in turn, could negatively affect Loblaw's reputation.
13.2
FINANCIAL RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT
Financial Risks
The Company is exposed to a number of risks, including those associated with financial instruments, which have
the potential to affect its operating and financial performance. The Company uses over-the-counter derivative
instruments to offset certain of these risks. Policies and guidelines prohibit the use of any derivative instrument
for trading or speculative purposes. The fair value of derivative instruments is subject to changing market
conditions which could negatively impact the financial performance of the Company.
The following is a summary of the Company's financial risks which are discussed in detail below:
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
Credit
Interest Rates
Common Share Prices
Liquidity and Capital Availability
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
The Company's consolidated financial statements are expressed in Canadian dollars, however a portion of the
Company's (excluding Loblaw's) net assets are denominated in U.S. dollars through both its net investment in
foreign operations in the U.S. and its foreign subsidiaries held by Dunedin and certain of its affiliates with a
functional currency that is the same as that of the Company. The U.S. dollar denominated net assets are
translated into Canadian dollars at the foreign currency exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. As a
result, the Company is exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses. Those gains and losses arising
from the translation of the U.S. dollar denominated assets of foreign subsidiaries with a functional currency that
is the same as that of the Company are included in operating income, while translation gains and losses on the
net investment in foreign operations in the U.S. are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. In
addition, revenues and expenses of all foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the foreign
currency exchange rates that approximate the rates in effect at the dates when such items are recognized. An
appreciating Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will negatively impact year-over-year changes in reported
sales, operating income and net earnings, while a depreciating Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will
have the opposite impact.
Loblaw is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate variability, primarily on its U.S. dollar denominated cash and
cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits held by Glenhuron, foreign denominated and
foreign currency based purchases in trade and other liabilities, and U.S. dollar private placement notes included
in long term debt. Loblaw and Glenhuron have cross currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts that
partially offset their respective exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Cross currency swaps
are transactions in which interest payments and principal amounts in one currency are exchanged against the
receipt of interest payments and principal amounts in a second currency. Despite these mitigation strategies, the
Company's financial performance could be negatively impacted by foreign currency variability.
44 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Credit
The Company is exposed to credit risk resulting from the possibility that counterparties could default on their
financial obligations to the Company. Exposure to credit risk relates to derivative instruments, cash and cash
equivalents, short term investments, security deposits, PC Bank's credit card receivables, Loblaw's franchise
loans receivable, accounts receivable from Loblaw's franchisees, other receivables from Weston Foods'
customers and suppliers and Loblaw's vendors, associated stores and independent accounts, and pension assets
held in the Company's defined benefit plans.
The risk related to derivative instruments, cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security
deposits is reduced by policies and guidelines that require that the Company enters into transactions only with
counterparties or issuers that have a minimum long term “A-” credit rating from a recognized credit rating
agency and place minimum and maximum limits for exposures to specific counterparties and instruments.
PC Bank manages its credit card receivable risk by employing stringent credit scoring techniques, actively
monitoring the credit card portfolio, and reviewing techniques and technology that can improve the
effectiveness of the collection process. In addition, these receivables are dispersed among a large, diversified
group of credit card customers. Loblaw's franchise loans receivable, accounts receivable from Loblaw's
franchisees, other receivables from Weston Foods' customers and suppliers and Loblaw's vendors, associated
stores and independent accounts are actively monitored on an ongoing basis and settled on a frequent basis in
accordance with the terms specified in the applicable agreements. Credit risk associated with investments in the
Company's defined benefit pension plans is described in the Defined Benefit Pension Plans discussion in
Section 13.1, “Operating Risks and Risk Management” of this MD&A.
Despite the mitigation strategies described above, it is possible that the Company's financial performance could
be negatively impacted by the failure of a counterparty to fulfill its obligations.
Interest Rates
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk from fluctuations in interest rates on its floating rate debt and
financial instruments, net of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits. GWL and
Loblaw manage interest rate risk by monitoring their respective mix of fixed and floating rate debt, net of cash
and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits, and by taking action as necessary to
maintain an appropriate balance considering current market conditions. Despite these mitigation strategies,
changes in interest rates could negatively affect the Company's financial performance.
Common Share Prices
GWL and Loblaw are exposed to common share market price risk as a result of the issuance of stock options to
certain employees to the extent that the equivalent shares are repurchased by GWL and Loblaw on exercise,
RSUs and PSUs. RSUs and PSUs negatively impact operating income when the common share prices increase and
positively impact operating income when the common share prices decline. GWL and Glenhuron are parties to
equity derivative contracts, which allow for settlement in cash, common shares or net settlement. These
derivatives change in value as the market prices of the GWL and Loblaw common shares change and provide a
partial offset to fluctuations in RSU and PSU plan expense or income. Despite this partial offset, increases in the
common share prices could negatively affect the Company's financial performance.
Changes in the Loblaw common share price impact the Company's net interest expense and other financing
charges. In 2001, WHL entered into an equity forward sale agreement based on 9.6 million Loblaw common
shares at an original forward price of $48.50 per Loblaw common share which, under the terms of the
agreement, had increased to a forward price of $92.26 (2011 – $88.14) per Loblaw common share as at year end
2012. The forward matures in 2031 and will be settled in cash as follows: WHL will receive the forward price and
will pay the market value of the underlying Loblaw common shares at maturity. The obligation of WHL under this
forward is secured by the underlying Loblaw common shares. WHL recognizes a non-cash charge or income,
which is included in consolidated net interest expense and other financing charges, representing the fair value
adjustment of WHL's forward sale agreement for 9.6 million shares. The fair value adjustment in the forward
contract is a non-cash item resulting from fluctuations in the market price of the underlying Loblaw shares that
WHL owns. WHL does not record any change in the market price associated with the Loblaw common shares it
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 45
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
owns. At maturity, if the forward price is greater (less) than the market price, WHL will receive (pay) cash equal
to the difference between the notional value and the market value of the forward contract. Any cash paid under
the forward contract could be offset by the sale of Loblaw common shares.
Liquidity and Capital Availability
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company cannot meet a demand for cash or fund its obligations as they come
due. Liquidity risk also includes the risk of not being able to liquidate assets in a timely manner at a reasonable
price. Difficulty accessing capital markets could impair the Company's capacity to grow, execute its business
model or generate financial returns.
Liquidity and capital availability risks are mitigated by maintaining appropriate levels of cash and cash
equivalents and short term investments, actively monitoring market conditions, by diversifying the Company's
sources of funding, including its committed credit facility and maintaining a well diversified maturity profile of
debt and capital obligations.
Despite these mitigation strategies, if GWL, Loblaw or PC Bank's financial performance and condition deteriorate
or downgrades in GWL's or Loblaw's current credit ratings occur, the ability to obtain funding from external
sources could be restricted. In addition, credit and capital markets are subject to inherent risks that could
negatively affect GWL's or Loblaw's access and ability to fund their financial or other liabilities.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
14.
The Company's majority shareholder is Mr. W. Galen Weston, who beneficially owns, directly and indirectly
through private companies which he controls, including Wittington Investments, Limited (“Wittington”), a total
of 80,724,599 of the Company’s common shares, representing approximately 63% (2011 – 63%) of the
Company's 128,221,841 outstanding common shares. The Company's policy is to conduct all transactions and
settle all balances with related parties on market terms and conditions.
Transactions between the Company and its consolidated entities have been eliminated on consolidation and are
not disclosed below.
In 2012, rental payments to Wittington by the Company amounted to $4 million (2011 – $4 million). As at year
end 2012 and 2011, there were no rental payments outstanding.
In 2012, inventory purchases from Associated British Foods plc, a related party by virtue of Mr. W. Galen Weston
being a director of such entity's parent company, amounted to $26 million (2011 – $26 million). As at year end
2012, $2 million (2011 – $2 million) was included in trade and other payables relating to these inventory
purchases.
Post-Employment Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors a number of post-employment plans, which are related parties. Contributions made by
the Company to these plans are discussed in Section 8.1, “Major Cash Flow Components” of this MD&A.
Income Tax Matters
From time to time, the Company and Wittington may enter into agreements to make elections that are
permitted or required under applicable income tax legislation with respect to affiliated corporations. These
elections and accompanying agreements did not have a material impact on the Company.
46 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Compensation of Key Management Personnel
The Company's key management personnel is comprised of certain members of the executive team of GWL,
Loblaw, Weston Foods and Wittington, as well as members of the Boards of GWL, Loblaw and Wittington to the
extent that they have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the day-to-day
activities of the Company.
Annual compensation of key management personnel that is directly attributable to the Company was as follows:
($ millions)
Salaries, director fees and other short term employee benefits
Share-based compensation
Total compensation
2012
18
8
26
$
$
2011
21
7
28
$
$
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
15.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments in applying the Company's accounting policies that affect the reported amounts and disclosures made
in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Within the context of this MD&A, a judgment is a decision made by management in respect of the application of
an accounting policy, a recognized or unrecognized financial statement amount and/or note disclosure, following
an analysis of relevant information that may include estimates and assumptions. Estimates and assumptions are
used mainly in determining the measurement of balances recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial
statements and are based on a set of underlying data that may include management's historical experience,
knowledge of current events and conditions and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Management continually evaluates the estimates and judgments it uses.
The following are the accounting policies subject to judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty that
the Company believes could have the most significant impact on the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements.
Inventories
Key sources of estimation Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value which requires the
Company to utilize estimates related to fluctuations in future retail prices, seasonality and costs necessary to sell
the inventory.
Impairment of non-financial assets (goodwill, intangible assets, fixed assets and investment properties)
Judgments made in relation to accounting policies applied Management is required to use judgment in
determining the grouping of assets to identify their cash generating units (“CGU”) for the purposes of testing
fixed assets for impairment. Judgment is further required to determine appropriate groupings of CGUs for the
level at which goodwill and intangible assets are tested for impairment. Loblaw has determined that each retail
location and each investment property is a separate CGU for purposes of impairment testing. For the purpose of
goodwill and intangible assets impairment testing, CGUs are grouped at the lowest level at which goodwill and
intangible assets are monitored for internal management purposes. In addition, judgment is used to determine
whether a triggering event has occurred requiring an impairment test to be completed.
Key sources of estimation In determining the recoverable amount of a CGU or a group of CGUs, various
estimates are employed. The Company determines fair value less costs to sell using such estimates as market
rental rates for comparable properties, recoverable operating costs for leases with tenants, non-recoverable
operating costs, discount rates, capitalization rates and terminal capitalization rates. The Company determines
value in use by using estimates including projected future sales, earnings, capital investment consistent with
strategic plans presented to GWL's and Loblaw's Boards. Discount rates are consistent with external industry
information reflecting the risk associated with the specific cash flows.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 47
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Franchise loan receivable and certain other financial assets
Judgments made in relation to accounting policies applied Management reviews franchise loans receivable,
trade receivables and certain other financial assets relating to their franchise business at each balance sheet
date utilizing judgment to determine whether a triggering event has occurred requiring an impairment test to be
completed.
Key sources of estimation Management determines the initial fair value of its franchise loans and certain other
financial assets using discounted cash flow models corroborated by other valuation techniques. The process of
determining these fair values requires management to make estimates of a long term nature regarding discount
rates, projected revenues and margins, as applicable, derived from past experience, actual operating results,
budgets and the Company's five year forecast.
Income and other taxes
Judgments made in relation to accounting policies applied The calculation of current and deferred income taxes
requires management to make certain judgments regarding the tax rules in jurisdictions where the Company
performs activities. Application of judgments is required regarding classification of transactions and in assessing
probable outcomes of claimed deductions including expectations about future operating results, the timing and
reversal of temporary differences and possible audits of income tax and other tax filings to the tax authorities.
Post-employment and other long term employee benefits
Key sources of estimation Accounting for the costs of defined benefit pension plans and other applicable post-
employment benefits is based on using a number of assumptions including estimates for expected return on
plan assets. Expected returns on plan assets is based on current market conditions, the asset mix, the active
management of defined benefit pension plan assets and historical returns. Other key assumptions for pension
obligations are based in part on actuarial determined data and current market conditions.
Allowance for credit card receivables
Key sources of estimation The allowance is measured based upon statistical analysis that includes estimates for
past and current performance, aging, arrears status, the level of allowance already in place, and management's
interpretation of economic conditions and other trends specific to our customer base, including but not limited
to bankruptcies. Changes in circumstances may cause future assessments of credit risk to be materially different
from current assessments, which could require an increase or decrease in the allowance for credit card
receivables.
16.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS IMPLEMENTED IN 2012
Financial Instruments – Disclosures In 2010, the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) issued
amendments to IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”, which increase the disclosure requirements for
transactions involving transfers of financial assets to help users of the financial statements evaluate the risk
exposures related to such transfers and the effect of those risks on an entity's financial position. These
amendments are effective and were implemented in the first quarter of 2012.
Deferred Tax – Recovery of Underlying Assets In 2010, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 12, “Income
Taxes” (“IAS 12”), that introduce an exception to the general measurement requirements of IAS 12 for
investment properties measured at fair value. These amendments were effective in the first quarter of 2012. As
part of its transition to IFRS, the Company elected to account for its investment properties at cost and as such,
the amendments did not have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
48 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
FUTURE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
17.
Unless otherwise indicated, the Company intends to adopt the following standards in its consolidated financial
statements for the annual period beginning on January 1, 2013:
Consolidated Financial Statements
In 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 10, “Consolidated Financial Statements” (“IFRS 10”). This IFRS replaces portions of
IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” (“IAS 27”), and supersedes SIC-12 “Consolidation-
Special Purpose Entities”. IFRS 10 defines principles of control and establishes the basis of determining when and
how an entity should be included within a set of consolidated financial statements. The standard introduces a
single control model that requires an entity to consolidate an investee when it has power, exposure to variability
in returns and has the ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns, regardless of whether voting
rights are present. The adoption of IFRS 10 is not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
In 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 12, “Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities” (“IFRS 12”). This IFRS requires
extensive disclosures relating to a company's interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates, and
unconsolidated structured entities. IFRS 12 enables users of the consolidated financial statements to evaluate
the nature and risks associated with a company's interests in other entities and the effects of those interests on a
company's financial performance and position. The adoption of IFRS 12 is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurement
In 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13, “Fair Value Measurement” (“IFRS 13”), which establishes a single framework for
the fair value measurement and disclosure of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The new standard
unifies the definition of fair value and also introduces new concepts including 'highest and best use' and
'principle markets' for non-financial assets and liabilities. There are additional disclosure requirements, including
increased fair value disclosure for financial instruments for interim financial statements. Although the Company
expects additional disclosure, it does not anticipate material measurement impacts on its consolidated financial
statements as a result of the adoption of IFRS 13.
Employee Benefits
In 2011, the IASB revised IAS 19, “Employee Benefits” (“IAS 19”). The most significant amendments for the
Company will be the requirement to immediately recognize all unvested past service costs and the replacement
of interest cost and expected return on plan assets with a net interest amount that is calculated by applying a
prescribed discount rate to the net defined benefit liability. Upon implementation of these amendments, the
Company will restate its annual 2012 consolidated financial statements. The preliminary expected impact arising
from the adoption of the amendments to IAS 19 is summarized as follows:
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
Increase (decrease)
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Operating income
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Income taxes
Net earnings
Basic net earnings per common share ($)
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Increase (decrease)
($ millions)
Net earnings
Other comprehensive income
2012
1
24
(5)
(18)
(0.09)
2012
(18)
18
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 49
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Increase (decrease)
($ millions)
Other liabilities
Equity
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
(2)
$
2
$
As a result, in 2013, post-employment and other long term employee benefits expense will be accounted for on
a consistent basis year-over-year. The amendments also require enhanced disclosures for defined benefit plans,
including additional information on the characteristics and risks of those plans.
Other Standards
In addition to the above standards, the Company will be implementing the following standards and amendments
effective January 1, 2013: IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”; IAS 28, “Investments in Associates”; and IAS 1,
“Presentation of Financial Statements”. The Company does not expect a significant impact as a result of these
standards and amendments on its consolidated financial statements.
Financial Instruments
In 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” and IAS 32, “Financial
Instruments: Presentation”, these amendments are required to be applied for periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect any significant impacts on its consolidated financial statements
as a result of these amendments.
In 2010, the IASB issued a new standard, IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments” (“IFRS 9”), which will ultimately replace
IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” (“IAS 39”). The replacement of IAS 39 is a
three-phase project with the objective of improving and simplifying the reporting for financial instruments.
The issuance of IFRS 9 is the first phase of the project, which provides guidance on the classification and
measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. This standard becomes effective on January 1, 2015,
with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its
consolidated financial statements.
OUTLOOK(2)
18.
This outlook reflects the underlying operating performance of the Company's operating segments as discussed
below.
For full year 2013, Weston Foods sales growth is expected to be moderate due to a combination of pricing and
modest volume growth. Adjusted operating margins(1)are expected to remain in line with 2012 as Weston Foods
invests in growth, marketing and innovation. The benefits from these investments are expected to be realized
increasingly over the course of the year, commencing in the second quarter of 2013.
In 2012, Loblaw strengthened its customer proposition and made significant progress with its IT infrastructure
implementation. These initiatives will continue in 2013, with investments in price, assortment and labour
expected to be offset by operating efficiencies. Investment in infrastructure programs will continue as the IT
system is rolled out to distribution centres and stores, with associated expenses flat to 2012. Sales growth in
2013 will be moderated by a competitive environment characterized by ongoing square footage expansions, a
new competitor's entry into the market and generic drug deflation. As a result, Loblaw expects modest growth in
adjusted operating income(1) in 2013, excluding the impact of the $61 million restructuring charge recorded in
the fourth quarter of 2012 and the impact of the previously announced plan to launch an IPO of a new REIT.
Over the long term, Loblaw still expects positive same store sales, a decline in IT and supply chain costs, and a
moderation of capital expenditures. This should result in growth in adjusted operating income(1), adjusted
EBITDA(1) and an increase in free cash flow(1).
(1) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(2) To be read in conjunction with Forward-Looking Statements beginning page 5.
50 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
19.
The Company uses the following non-GAAP financial measures: adjusted operating income and adjusted
operating margin, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin, adjusted basic net earnings per common
share, adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, interest coverage and return on average net assets. The
Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to both management and
investors in measuring the financial performance and financial condition of the Company for the reasons
outlined below.
Certain expenses and income that must be recognized under GAAP are not necessarily reflective of the
Company's underlying operating performance. For this reason, management uses certain non-GAAP financial
measures to exclude the impact of these items when analyzing consolidated and segment underlying operating
performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are also helpful in assessing underlying operating
performance on a consistent basis.
From time to time, the Company may exclude additional items if it believes doing so would result in a more
effective analysis of underlying operating performance. The exclusion of certain items does not imply that they
are non-recurring. Loblaw does not report its results of operations on an adjusted basis, however the Company
excludes the impact of certain Loblaw items, as applicable, when reporting its consolidated and segment results.
These non-GAAP financial measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and therefore they
may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, and they
should not be construed as an alternative to other financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA
The Company believes adjusted operating income is useful in assessing the Company's underlying operating
performance and in making decisions regarding the ongoing operations of its business. The Company believes
adjusted EBITDA is also useful in assessing the underlying operating performance of the Company's ongoing
operations and in assessing the Company's ability to generate cash flows to fund its cash requirements, including
its capital investment program.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 51
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The following tables reconcile adjusted operating income and adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net earnings attributable
to shareholders of the Company reported for the periods ended as indicated.
Quarters Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Loblaw Other(1) Consolidated
Weston
Foods
Loblaw Other(1)
Consolidated
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Net earnings attributable to shareholders
Weston
Foods
of the Company
$
Add impact of the following:
Non-controlling interests
Income taxes
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Operating income (loss)
Add (deduct) impact of the following:
Restructuring and other charges(2)
Fair value adjustment of commodity derivatives
$
at Weston Foods
Share-based compensation net of
equity derivatives
MEPP withdrawal liability incurred by
Weston Foods
Post-retirement plan change at Weston Foods
Weston Foods insurance proceeds
Foreign currency translation (gain) loss
Adjusted operating income
Depreciation and amortization
Adjusted EBITDA
42 $
260 $
18 $
63
2
3
10
(4)
17
(6)
(5)
$
$
57 $
325 $
14
71 $
187
512 $
(18)
$
$
65
51
34
170
320
66
10
(2)
17
(6)
(5)
(18)
382
201
583
$
$
57 $
313 $
(18) $
5
(1)
(3)
(2)
4
$
$
56 $
317 $
15
71 $
170
487 $
18
$
$
109
64
71
108
352
5
(1)
1
(2)
18
373
185
558
(1) Operating income in the fourth quarter of 2012 included a gain of $18 million (2011 – loss of $18 million) related to the effect of
(2)
foreign currency translation on a portion of the U.S. dollar denominated cash and short term investments held by foreign operations.
Restructuring and other charges at Loblaw included a $61 million charge (2011 – nil) associated with the reduction in head office and
administrative positions and $2 million (2011 – nil) related to changes in Loblaw's distribution network. Restructuring and other
charges included $1 million (2011 – $3 million) of accelerated depreciation incurred by Weston Foods.
52 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Net earnings attributable to shareholders
of the Company
Add impact of the following:
Non-controlling interests
Income taxes
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Operating income (loss)
Add (deduct) impact of the following:
Restructuring and other charges(2)
Fair value adjustment of commodity derivatives
$
at Weston Foods
Share-based compensation net of
equity derivatives
MEPP withdrawal liability incurred by
Weston Foods
Post-retirement plan change at Weston Foods
Weston Foods insurance proceeds
Certain prior years' commodity tax
matters at Loblaw
Gain on sale of a portion of a Loblaw property
Foreign currency translation loss (gain)
Adjusted operating income
Depreciation and amortization
Adjusted EBITDA
Years Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Weston
Foods
Loblaw Other(1) Consolidated
Weston
Foods
Loblaw Other(1)
Consolidated
$
486
240
249
417
$
635
284
324
366
228 $ 1,188 $
(24) $
1,392
$
208 $ 1,376 $
25 $
1,609
72
12
(6)
1
28
51
(6)
(5)
84
(6)
29
51
(6)
(5)
13
31
20
(7)
31
27
15
(14)
$
$
275 $ 1,288 $
59
777
334 $ 2,065 $
24
$
$
24
1,563
836
2,399
$
$
265 $ 1,435 $
60
699
325 $ 2,134 $
(25)
$
$
44
31
47
(7)
15
(14)
(25)
1,700
759
2,459
(1) Year-to-date operating income included a loss of $24 million (2011 – gain of $25 million) related to the effect of foreign currency
translation on a portion of the U.S. dollar denominated cash and short term investments held by foreign operations.
(2) Year-to-date restructuring and other charges at Loblaw included a $61 million charge (2011 – nil) associated with the reduction in
head office and administrative positions and $11 million (2011 – $23 million) related to changes in Loblaw's distribution network. In
2011, other charges also included a charge of $8 million related to an internal realignment of Loblaw's business centered around its
two primary store formats, conventional and discount. Restructuring and other charges included $4 million (2011 – $3 million) of
accelerated depreciation incurred by Weston Foods.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 53
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
The year-over-year change in the following items influenced operating income in the fourth quarter of 2012 and
year-to-date:
Restructuring and other charges The Company continuously evaluates strategic and cost reduction initiatives
related to its store infrastructure, manufacturing assets, distribution networks and administrative infrastructure
with the objective of ensuring a low cost operating structure. Restructuring activities related to these initiatives
are ongoing. The details of restructuring and other charges are included in Section 7, “Results of Reportable
Operating Segments” and Section 10.2, “Fourth Quarter Results” of this MD&A.
Fair value adjustment of commodity derivatives at Weston Foods Weston Foods is exposed to commodity price
fluctuations primarily as a result of purchases of certain raw materials, fuels and utilities. In accordance with the
Company's commodity risk management policy, Weston Foods enters into commodity derivatives to reduce the
impact of price fluctuations in forecasted raw material purchases over a specified period of time. These
commodity derivatives are not acquired for trading or speculative purposes. Hedge accounting is not applied to
these commodity derivatives and as a result, changes in the fair value, which include realized and unrealized
gains and losses related to future purchases of raw materials, are recorded in operating income. In the fourth
quarter of 2012 and year-to-date, Weston Foods recorded a charge of $10 million (2011 – income of $1 million)
and income of $6 million (2011 – a charge of $31 million), respectively, related to the fair value adjustment of
exchange traded commodity derivatives. Despite the impact of accounting for these commodity derivatives on
the Company's reported results, the derivatives have the economic impact of largely mitigating the associated
risks arising from price fluctuations in the underlying commodities during the period that the commodity
derivatives are held.
Share-based compensation net of equity derivatives GWL and Glenhuron have entered into equity derivatives.
These derivatives partially hedge the impact of increases in the value of GWL and Loblaw common shares on
share-based compensation cost. The amount of net share-based compensation cost recorded in operating
income is mainly dependent upon changes in the value of GWL and Loblaw common shares and the number and
vesting of RSUs and PSUs relative to the number of common shares underlying the equity derivatives. The
Company assesses its stock option plan, RSU plan, PSU plan and equity derivative impacts on a net basis and
therefore the impact of stock options is also excluded from operating income when management reviews
consolidated and segment operating performance. In the fourth quarter of 2012 and year-to-date, income of
$2 million (2011 – a charge of $1 million) and a charge of $29 million (2011 – $47 million), respectively, were
recorded related to share-based compensation net of equity derivatives.
Multi-employer pension plan withdrawal liability incurred by Weston Foods During 2012, Weston Foods
withdrew from one of the United States MEPPs in which it participated and as a result, paid a withdrawal liability
of $34 million. During the fourth quarter of 2012, another participating employer withdrew from the plan and a
mass withdrawal was triggered. As a result of the mass withdrawal, the Company is subject to an incremental
withdrawal liability. Management's estimate of the incremental withdrawal liability is approximately $17 million
which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Post-retirement plan change at Weston Foods During the fourth quarter of 2012, Weston Foods negotiated the
elimination of certain post-retirement benefits. As a result, a net gain of $6 million was recorded in operating
income.
Weston Foods insurance proceeds In the fourth quarter of 2012 and year-to-date, Weston Foods recorded
insurance proceeds of $5 million (2011 – net proceeds of $2 million) and proceeds of $5 million (2011 – net
proceeds of $7 million), respectively, related to the loss of a Quebec facility in 2010.
Certain prior years' commodity tax matters at Loblaw During the second quarter of 2011, Loblaw recorded a
charge of $15 million related to certain prior years' commodity tax matters.
Gain on sale of a portion of a Loblaw property During the third quarter of 2011, Loblaw recorded a gain of
$14 million related to the sale of a portion of a property in North Vancouver, British Columbia.
54 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Foreign currency translation gains and losses The Company's consolidated financial statements are expressed
in Canadian dollars. A portion of the Company's (excluding Loblaw's) net assets are denominated in U.S. dollars
and as a result, the Company is exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses. The impact of foreign
currency translation on a portion of the U.S. dollar denominated net assets, primarily cash and short term
investments held by foreign operations is recorded in operating income. In the fourth quarter of 2012, a foreign
currency translation gain of $18 million (2011 – loss of $18 million) was recorded in operating income as a result
of the depreciation (2011 – appreciation) of the Canadian dollar. Year-to-date, a foreign currency translation loss
of $24 million (2011 – gain of $25 million) was recorded in operating income as a result of the appreciation
(2011 – depreciation) of the Canadian dollar.
Adjusted Basic Net Earnings per Common Share
The Company believes adjusted basic net earnings per common share is useful in assessing the Company's
underlying operating performance and in making decisions regarding the ongoing operations of its business.
The following table reconciles adjusted basic net earnings per common share to GAAP basic net earnings per
common share reported for the periods ended as indicated.
Quarters Ended
Years Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
0.43
$
Dec. 31,2011
0.77
$
Dec. 31, 2012
3.45
$
Dec. 31, 2011
4.58
$
(unaudited)
($)
Basic net earnings per common share
Add (deduct) impact of the following(1):
Fair value adjustment of the forward sale agreement
for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares
Restructuring and other charges
Fair value adjustment of commodity derivatives
at Weston Foods
Share-based compensation net of equity derivatives
MEPP withdrawal liability incurred by Weston Foods
Post-retirement plan change at Weston Foods
Weston Foods insurance proceeds
Certain prior years' commodity tax matters at Loblaw
Gain on sale of a portion of a Loblaw property
0.44
0.24
0.06
(0.03)
0.08
(0.03)
(0.03)
0.09
0.02
(0.01)
0.01
(0.01)
0.20
0.33
(0.03)
0.14
0.24
(0.03)
(0.03)
(0.10)
0.18
0.17
0.27
(0.04)
0.05
(0.06)
(0.19)
4.86
Foreign currency translation (gain) loss
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share
(0.14)
1.02
$
$
0.14
1.01
$
0.19
4.46
$
(1) Net of interest, income taxes and non-controlling interests, as applicable.
In addition to the items described in the “Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA” section above, the
year-over-year change in the following items also influenced basic net earnings per common share in the fourth
quarter of 2012 and year-to-date:
Fair value adjustment of the forward sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares The fair value
adjustment of the forward sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares is non-cash and is included in
consolidated net interest expense and other financing charges. The adjustment is determined by changes in the
value of the underlying Loblaw common shares. At maturity, any cash paid under the forward sale agreement
could be offset by the sale of the underlying Loblaw common shares. In the fourth quarter of 2012, a charge of
$0.44 (2011 – $0.09) per common share was recorded in net interest expense and other financing charges as a
result of the increase in the market price of Loblaw common shares. Year-to-date, a charge of $0.20 (2011 –
income of $0.10) per common share was recorded as a result of the increase (2011 – decrease) in the market
price of Loblaw common shares.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 55
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Adjusted Debt
The Company believes adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA is useful in assessing its ability to cover its debt
repayments with its adjusted EBITDA.
The following table reconciles adjusted debt used in the adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio to GAAP
measures reported as at the years ended as indicated.
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Bank indebtedness
Short term debt
Long term debt due within one year
Long term debt
Certain other liabilities
Fair value of financial derivatives related to the above debt
Total debt
Less: Independent securitization trusts in short term debt
Independent securitization trusts in long term debt
Independent funding trusts
Guaranteed Investment Certificates
Adjusted debt
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
3
$
$
$
$
1,319
672
6,261
39
(440)
7,851
$
905
600
459
303
1,280
87
6,757
39
(425)
7,741
905
600
424
276
5,584
$
5,536
Capital securities are excluded from the calculation of adjusted debt and adjusted net debt.
Free Cash Flow
The Company believes that free cash flow is useful in assessing the Company's cash available for additional
funding and investing activities.
The following table reconciles free cash flow to GAAP measures reported for the years ended as indicated.
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net increase in credit card receivables
Less: Fixed asset purchases
Free cash flow
2012
1,852
204
1,110
946
$
$
2011
1,974
104
1,027
1,051
$
$
Interest Coverage
The Company believes interest coverage is useful in assessing the Company's ability to cover its net interest
expense with its operating income.
The Company calculates interest coverage as operating income divided by net interest expense and other
financing charges adding back interest capitalized to fixed assets.
The following table reconciles interest expense used in the interest coverage ratio to GAAP measures reported
for the years ended as indicated.
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Add: Interest capitalized to fixed assets
Interest expense
56 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
2012
417
1
418
$
$
2011
366
1
367
$
$
Net Assets
The Company believes the return on average net assets ratio is useful in assessing the return on operating assets.
The Company calculates return on average net assets as operating income divided by average net assets.
The following table reconciles net assets used in the return on average net assets ratio to GAAP measures
reported as at the years ended as indicated.
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Total assets
Less: Cash and cash equivalents
Short term investments
Security deposits
Fair value of the forward sale agreement for
9.6 million Loblaw common shares
Trade and other payables
Net assets
$
$
$
Other(1)
1,704
313
1,391
$
Loblaw
18,121
1,079
716
252
3,720
$
12,354
$
$
(1) Other includes cash and cash equivalents and short term investments held by Dunedin and certain of its affiliates.
(unaudited)
($ millions)
Total assets
Less: Cash and cash equivalents
Short term investments
Security deposits
Fair value of the forward sale agreement for
9.6 million Loblaw common shares
Trade and other payables
Net assets
$
$
Other(1)
1,860
314
1,546
Loblaw
17,588
$
$
966
754
266
3,677
$
11,925
$
$
Weston
Foods
1,979
197
31
96
483
217
955
92
62
101
478
263
879
Weston
Foods
1,875
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Consolidated
$
21,804
1,589
2,138
348
483
3,937
13,309
1,372
2,362
367
478
3,940
12,804
As at
Dec. 31, 2011
Consolidated
$
21,323
(1) Other includes cash and cash equivalents and short term investments held by Dunedin and certain of its affiliates.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 57
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
20.
Additional information about the Company, including its Annual Information Form and other disclosure
documents, has been filed electronically with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities in Canada through
the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) and is available online at www.sedar.com.
This Annual Report includes selected information on Loblaw Companies Limited, a 62.9%-owned public reporting
subsidiary company with shares trading on the TSX. For information regarding Loblaw, readers should also refer
to the materials filed by Loblaw with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities from time to time. These
filings are also available on Loblaw's corporate website at www.loblaw.ca.
Toronto, Canada
February 27, 2013
58 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Financial Results
Management's Statement of Responsibility for Financial Reporting
Independent Auditors' Report
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Nature and Description of the Reporting Entity
Significant Accounting Policies
Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
Future Accounting Standards
Net Interest Expense and Other Financing Charges
Income Taxes
Basic and Diluted Net Earnings per Common Share
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short Term Investments and Security Deposits
Accounts Receivable
Credit Card Receivables
Inventories
Assets Held for Sale
Fixed Assets
Investment Properties
Note 1.
Note 2.
Note 3.
Note 4.
Note 5.
Note 6.
Note 7.
Note 8.
Note 9.
Note 10.
Note 11.
Note 12.
Note 13.
Note 14.
Note 15. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Note 16. Other Assets
Provisions
Note 17.
Short Term Debt
Note 18.
Note 19.
Long Term Debt
Note 20. Other Liabilities
Note 21.
Note 22.
Note 23.
Note 24.
Note 25.
Note 26.
Note 27.
Note 28.
Note 29.
Note 30.
Note 31.
Note 32.
Note 33.
Note 34.
Note 35.
Capital Securities
Share Capital
Subsidiary Capital Transactions
Capital Management
Post-Employment and Other Long Term Employee Benefits
Share-Based Compensation
Employee Costs
Leases
Financial Instruments
Financial Risk Management
Contingencies
Financial Guarantees
Related Party Transactions
Subsequent Event
Segment Information
Three Year Summary
Earnings Coverage Exhibit to the Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements
Glossary
60
61
62
62
62
63
64
65
66
66
66
75
77
79
79
81
82
82
83
84
84
85
87
88
90
91
92
93
94
95
95
97
98
99
106
112
112
113
118
120
121
122
123
124
126
128
130
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 59
Management's Statement of Responsibility for Financial Reporting
The management of George Weston Limited is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, Management's Discussion and Analysis and all other
information in the Annual Report. This responsibility includes the selection and consistent application of
appropriate accounting principles and methods in addition to making the judgments and estimates necessary to
prepare the consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. It also includes ensuring that the financial information
presented elsewhere in the Annual Report is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.
Management is also responsible for providing reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and that
relevant and reliable financial information is produced. Management is required to design a system of internal
controls and is required to certify as to the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial
reporting. Internal auditors, who are employees of the Company, review and evaluate internal controls on
management's behalf. KPMG LLP, whose report follows, were appointed as independent auditors by a vote of the
Company's shareholders to audit the consolidated financial statements.
The Board of Directors, acting through an Audit Committee comprised solely of directors who are independent,
is responsible for determining that management fulfills its responsibilities in the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements and the financial control of operations. The Audit Committee recommends the independent
auditors for appointment by the shareholders. The Audit Committee meets regularly with senior and financial
management, internal auditors and the independent auditors to discuss internal controls, auditing activities and
financial reporting matters. The independent auditors and internal auditors have unrestricted access to the Audit
Committee. These consolidated financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis have been
approved by the Board of Directors for inclusion in the Annual Report based on the review and recommendation
of the Audit Committee.
[signed]
W. Galen Weston
Executive Chairman
February 27, 2013
Toronto, Canada
[signed]
Paviter S. Binning
President
[signed]
Richard Dufresne
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
60 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Shareholders of George Weston Limited:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of George Weston Limited, which
comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the consolidated
statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flow for the years then ended and
notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management
determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors' Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards
require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment
of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In
making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair
presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal
control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a
basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of George Weston Limited as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and its
consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
February 27, 2013
Toronto, Canada
Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 61
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
For the years ended December 31
(millions of Canadian dollars except where otherwise indicated)
Revenue
Operating Expenses
Cost of inventories sold (note 11)
Selling, general and administrative expenses (note 29)
Operating Income
Net Interest Expense and Other Financing Charges (note 5)
Earnings Before Income Taxes
Income Taxes (note 6)
Net Earnings
Attributable to:
Shareholders of the Company
Non-Controlling Interests
Net Earnings
Net Earnings per Common Share ($) (note 7)
Basic
Diluted
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)
Net earnings
Other comprehensive loss
Foreign currency translation adjustment (note 29)
Net defined benefit plan actuarial losses (note 25)
Other comprehensive loss
Comprehensive Income
Attributable to:
Shareholders of the Company
Non-Controlling Interests
Comprehensive Income
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
62 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
2012
32,742
$
2011
32,376
$
24,700
6,650
31,350
1,392
417
975
249
726
486
240
726
3.45
3.38
$
$
$
24,421
6,346
30,767
1,609
366
1,243
324
919
635
284
919
4.58
4.55
2012
726
$
(13)
(24)
(37)
689
457
232
689
$
2011
919
12
(238)
(226)
693
486
207
693
$
$
$
$
$
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at December 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents (note 8)
Short term investments (note 8)
Accounts receivable (note 9)
Credit card receivables (note 10)
Inventories (note 11)
Income taxes recoverable
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Assets held for sale (note 12)
Total Current Assets
Fixed Assets (note 13)
Investment Properties (note 14)
Goodwill and Intangible Assets (note 15)
Deferred Income Taxes (note 6)
Security Deposits (note 8)
Franchise Loans Receivable (note 29)
Other Assets (note 16)
Total Assets
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Bank indebtedness
Trade and other payables
Provisions (note 17)
Short term debt (note 18)
Long term debt due within one year (note 19)
Total Current Liabilities
Provisions (note 17)
Long Term Debt (note 19)
Deferred Income Taxes (note 6)
Other Liabilities (note 20)
Capital Securities (note 21)
Total Liabilities
EQUITY
Share Capital (note 22)
Contributed Surplus (notes 23 & 26)
Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Total Equity Attributable to Shareholders of the Company
Non-Controlling Interests
Total Equity
Total Liabilities and Equity
2012
2011
$
$
$
$
1,589
2,138
559
2,305
2,132
37
83
30
8,873
9,452
100
1,571
316
348
363
781
21,804
3,937
123
1,319
672
6,051
94
6,261
160
945
223
13,734
953
28
4,735
(24)
5,692
2,378
8,070
21,804
$
$
$
$
1,372
2,362
559
2,101
2,147
37
122
32
8,732
9,172
82
1,555
295
367
331
789
21,323
3
3,940
67
1,280
87
5,377
94
6,757
160
1,033
222
13,643
950
24
4,496
(11)
5,459
2,221
7,680
21,323
Leases (note 28). Contingencies (note 31). Financial guarantees (note 32). Subsequent event (note 34).
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Approved on behalf of the Board
[signed]
W. Galen Weston
Director & Executive Chairman
[signed]
A. Charles Baillie
Director
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 63
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(millions of Canadian dollars except
where otherwise indicated)
Common
Shares
Preferred
Shares
Total
Share
Capital
Contributed
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
Cash
Flow
Hedges
Balance as at Dec. 31, 2011
$
133 $
817 $
950 $
24 $ 4,496 $
(15) $
4 $
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
(11) $ 2,221 $ 7,680
Non-
Controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
Net earnings
Other comprehensive
loss(1)
Comprehensive
income (loss)
Effect of share-based
compensation (note 26)
Subsidiary capital
transactions (notes 23 & 26)
Purchased for
cancellation (note 22)
Dividends declared
Per common share ($)
– $1.46
Per preferred share ($)
– Series I – $1.45
– Series III – $1.30
– Series IV – $1.30
– Series V – $1.19
3
3
4
486
(16)
470
(1)
(187)
(13)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(13)
(13)
240
726
(8)
(37)
232
689
(13)
(13)
5
9
8
13
(1)
(89)
(276)
(13)
(10)
(10)
(10)
Balance as at Dec. 31, 2012
$
136 $
817 $
953 $
28 $ 4,735 $
(28) $
4 $
(24) $ 2,378 $ 8,070
3
3
4
(231)
(75)
(299)
(1) Other comprehensive loss includes actuarial losses of $24, $16 of which is presented above in retained earnings and $8 in
non-controlling interests.
(millions of Canadian dollars except
where otherwise indicated)
Common
Shares
Preferred
Shares
Total
Share
Capital
Contributed
Surplus
Retained
Earnings
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustment
Cash
Flow
Hedges
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Non-
Controlling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balance as at Dec. 31, 2010
$
133 $
817 $
950 $
(14) $ 4,311 $
(27) $
4 $
(23) $ 2,080 $ 7,304
Net earnings
Other comprehensive
(loss) income(1)
Comprehensive income
Effect of share-based
compensation (note 26)
Subsidiary capital
transactions (notes 23 & 26)
Purchased for
cancellation (note 22)
Dividends declared
Per common share ($)
– $1.44
Per preferred share ($)
– Series I – $1.45
– Series III – $1.30
– Series IV – $1.30
– Series V – $1.19
1
(1)
1
(1)
635
(161)
474
(60)
(186)
(13)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(289)
43
(5)
38
12
12
12
12
284
(77)
207
17
5
919
(226)
693
61
(61)
(88)
(274)
(13)
(10)
(10)
(10)
(317)
(66)
Balance as at Dec. 31, 2011
$
133 $
817 $
950 $
24 $ 4,496 $
(15) $
4 $
(11) $ 2,221 $ 7,680
(1) Other comprehensive loss includes actuarial losses of $238, $161 of which is presented above in retained earnings and $77 in
non-controlling interests.
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
64 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
$
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
For the years ended December 31
(millions of Canadian dollars)
Operating Activities
Net earnings
Income taxes (note 6)
Net interest expense and other financing charges (note 5)
Depreciation and amortization
Foreign currency translation loss (gain) (note 29)
Income taxes paid
Interest received
Settlement of equity derivative contracts (note 29)
Change in credit card receivables (note 10)
Change in non-cash working capital
Fixed asset and other related impairments
Gain on disposal of assets
Other
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Investing Activities
Fixed asset purchases (note 13)
Change in short term investments
Business acquisition – net of cash acquired
Proceeds from fixed asset sales
Change in franchise investments and other receivables
Change in security deposits
Goodwill and intangible asset additions (note 15)
Other
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Financing Activities
Change in bank indebtedness
Change in short term debt (note 18)
Long term debt – Issued (note 19)
– Retired (note 19)
Share capital – Issued (notes 22 & 26 )
– Retired (note 22)
Subsidiary share capital – Issued (notes 23 & 26)
– Retired (note 23)
Interest paid
Dividends – To common shareholders
– To preferred shareholders
– To minority shareholders
Cash Flows used in Financing Activities
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year
$
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2012
726
249
417
840
24
(261)
65
(204)
43
19
(14)
(52)
1,852
(1,110)
181
64
(22)
14
(43)
(916)
(3)
39
111
(115)
2
(1)
22
(16)
(456)
(185)
(44)
(65)
(711)
(8)
217
1,372
1,589
$
$
2011
919
324
366
762
(25)
(277)
76
(22)
(104)
(36)
7
(18)
2
1,974
(1,027)
929
(12)
57
(18)
74
(13)
(5)
(15)
(8)
409
635
(1,209)
1
(61)
21
(39)
(489)
(1,186)
(44)
(79)
(2,049)
9
(81)
1,453
1,372
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 65
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(millions of Canadian dollars except where otherwise indicated)
Note 1. Nature and Description of the Reporting Entity
George Weston Limited (“GWL”) is a Canadian public company incorporated in 1928, engaged in food processing
and distribution. Its registered office is located at 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Toronto, Canada M4T 2S7. GWL and its
subsidiaries are together referred to in these consolidated financial statements as the “Company”. The
Company's parent is Wittington Investments, Limited (“Wittington”).
The Company has two reportable operating segments, Loblaw Companies Limited (“Loblaw”) and Weston Foods,
and holds cash and short term investments. The Loblaw operating segment is Canada's largest food retailer and a
leading provider of drugstore, general merchandise and financial products and services. The Weston Foods
operating segment is a leading fresh and frozen baking company in Canada and operates a frozen baking
manufacturing business in the United States (“U.S.”) and a North American biscuit manufacturing business.
In December 2012, Loblaw announced its intention to create a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”), which will
acquire a significant portion of Loblaw's real estate assets and sell units by way of an Initial Public Offering
(“IPO”). The IPO of the REIT is expected to be completed by mid 2013, subject to prevailing market conditions
and receipt of required regulatory approvals, including approval to list the units on the Toronto Stock Exchange
(“TSX”).
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
Statement of Compliance The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS” or “GAAP”) as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board (“IASB”) and using the accounting policies described herein.
These consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance by the Company's Board of Directors
(“Board”) on February 27, 2013.
Basis of Preparation The consolidated financial statements were prepared on a historical cost basis, except for
certain financial instruments carried at fair value. Liabilities for cash-settled share-based compensation
arrangements are measured at fair value (see note 26) and defined benefit plan assets are also recorded at fair
value with the obligations related to these pension plans measured at their discounted present value (see
note 25).
The significant accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently in the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars.
Basis of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GWL and other entities
that the Company controls in accordance with IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”
(“IAS 27”). The Company's interest in the voting share capital of its subsidiaries is 100% except for Loblaw, which
is 62.9% (December 31, 2011 – 63.0%). GWL's ownership in Loblaw was impacted by changes in Loblaw's
common share equity.
Special Purpose Entities (“SPE”) are consolidated under Standing Interpretations Committee (“SIC”)
Interpretation 12, “Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities” (“SIC-12”), if, based on an evaluation of the
substance of its relationship with the Company and the SPE's risks and rewards, the Company concludes that it
controls the SPE. SPEs controlled by the Company were established under terms that impose strict limitations on
the decision-making powers of the SPE's management and that result in the Company receiving the majority of
the benefits related to the SPE's operations and net assets, being exposed to the majority of risks incident to the
SPE's activities, and retaining the majority of the residual or ownership risks related to the SPEs or their assets.
66 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Non-controlling interests are recorded in the consolidated financial statements and represent the non-
controlling shareholders' portion of the net assets and net earnings of Loblaw. Transactions with non-controlling
interests are treated as transactions with equity owners of the Company. Changes in GWL's ownership interest in
its subsidiaries are accounted for as equity transactions.
Fiscal Year The Company's year end is December 31. Activities are reported on a fiscal year ending on the
Saturday closest to December 31.
As a result, the Company's fiscal year is usually 52 weeks in duration but includes a 53rd week every five to six
years. Each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 contained 52 weeks. The next
53-week year will occur in fiscal year 2014.
Net Earnings per Common Share (“EPS”) Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the net earnings available to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
The diluted EPS calculation assumes that the weighted average number of outstanding stock options during the
period with an exercise price below the average market price during the period are exercised and the assumed
proceeds are used to purchase the Company's common shares at the average market price during the period.
Diluted EPS also takes into consideration the dilutive effect of the conversion options on the Loblaw capital
securities, the equity derivatives recorded in trade and other payables, and Loblaw's certain other liabilities.
Revenue Recognition Weston Foods recognizes sales upon delivery of its products to customers and acceptance
of its products by customers net of provisions for returns, discounts and allowances. Loblaw revenue includes
sales, net of estimated returns, to customers through corporate stores operated by Loblaw, sales to and service
fees from franchised stores, associated stores, independent account customers, and financial services net of
sales incentives offered by Loblaw. Loblaw recognizes revenue at the time the sale is made to its customers and
at the time of delivery of inventory to its associated and franchise stores. Interest income on credit card loans,
service fees and other revenue related to financial services are recognized on an accrual basis.
Loblaw customer loyalty awards are accounted for as a separate component of the sales transaction in which
they are granted. A portion of the consideration received in a transaction that includes the issuance of an award
is deferred until the awards are ultimately redeemed. The allocation of the consideration to the award is based
on an evaluation of the award's estimated fair value at the date of the transaction using the residual fair value
method.
On the initial sale of a franchising arrangement, Loblaw offers products and services as part of a multiple
deliverable arrangement which is recorded using a relative fair value approach.
Income Taxes The asset and liability method of accounting is used for income taxes. Under the asset and liability
method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the deferred income tax consequences
attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying values of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective income tax bases. Current and deferred taxes are charged to or credited in the
consolidated statements of earnings, except when it relates to a business combination, or items charged or
credited directly to equity or to other comprehensive income (loss). Current tax is the expected tax payable or
receivable on the taxable income or loss for the period, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the
reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is measured using
enacted or substantively enacted income tax rates expected to apply in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A deferred tax asset is recognized for unused tax losses and
credits to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be
utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no
longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when
they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current
tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments
in subsidiaries, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Company
and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 67
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid marketable investments with a maturity of 90 days or
less from the date of acquisition.
Short Term Investments Short term investments primarily consist of bankers' acceptances, government treasury
bills, corporate commercial paper, and government agency securities.
Security Deposits Security deposits consist primarily of cash, government treasury bills and notes, and
government agency securities, which are required to be placed with counterparties as collateral to enter into and
maintain certain outstanding letters of credit and certain financial derivative contracts. The amount of the
required security deposits will fluctuate primarily as a result of the change in market value of the derivatives.
Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable consist mainly of receivables from Loblaw's vendors, independent
franchisees, associated stores, independent accounts and receivables from Weston Foods customers and
suppliers, and are recorded net of allowances.
Credit Card Receivables Loblaw, through President's Choice Bank (“PC Bank”), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Loblaw, has credit card receivables that are stated net of an allowance. Interest income is recorded in revenue
and interest expense is recorded in net interest expense and other financing charges using the effective interest
method. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts the estimated future cash receipts through the
expected life of the credit card receivable or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the carrying amount. When
calculating the effective interest rate, Loblaw estimates future cash flows considering all contractual terms of the
financial instrument, but not future credit losses.
PC Bank considers evidence of impairment losses on a portfolio basis for which losses cannot be determined on
an item-by-item basis. The allowance is based upon a statistical analysis of past and current performance, the
level of allowance already in place and management's judgment. The allowance for credit card receivables is
deducted from the credit card receivables balance. Interest on the impaired asset continues to be recognized.
The net credit loss experience for the year is recognized in operating income.
Periodically, PC Bank transfers credit card receivables by selling them to and repurchasing them from
independent securitization trusts. PC Bank is required to absorb a portion of the related credit losses.
Accordingly, Loblaw continues to recognize these assets in credit card receivables and the transferred receivables
are accounted for as secured financing transactions. The Company consolidates one of the independent
securitization trusts, Eagle Credit Card Trust (“Eagle”), as an SPE. The associated liabilities secured by these
assets are included in either short term debt or long term debt, based on their characteristics, and are carried at
amortized cost.
Franchise Loans Receivable Franchise loans receivable are comprised of amounts due from independent
franchisees for loans issued through an independent funding trust that is consolidated under SIC-12. Each
independent franchisee provides security to the independent funding trust for its obligations by way of a general
security agreement. In the event that an independent franchisee defaults on its loan and Loblaw has not, within
a specified time period, assumed the loan, or the default is not otherwise remedied, the independent funding
trust would assign the loan to Loblaw and draw upon a standby letter of credit. Loblaw has agreed to reimburse
the issuing bank for any amount drawn on the standby letter of credit.
Inventories The Company values inventories at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost includes the costs
of purchases net of vendor allowances plus other costs, such as transportation, that are directly incurred to bring
inventories to their present location and condition. Loblaw's seasonal general merchandise, Loblaw's inventories
at distribution centres and Weston Foods inventories are measured at weighted average cost. Loblaw uses the
retail method to measure the cost of the majority of retail store inventories. Loblaw estimates net realizable
value as the amount that inventories are expected to be sold taking into consideration fluctuations in retail
prices due to seasonality less estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are written down to net
realizable value when the cost of inventories is estimated to be unrecoverable due to obsolescence, damage or
declining selling prices. When circumstances that previously caused inventories to be written down below cost
no longer exist or when there is clear evidence of an increase in selling prices, the amount of the write-down
68 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
previously recorded is reversed. Storage costs, indirect administrative overhead and certain selling costs related
to inventories are expensed in the period that these costs are incurred.
Vendor Allowances The Company receives allowances from certain of its vendors whose products it purchases.
These allowances are received for a variety of buying and/or merchandising activities, including vendor programs
such as volume purchase allowances, purchase discounts, listing fees and exclusivity allowances. Allowances
received from a vendor are reduced in the cost of the vendor's products or services and are recognized as a
reduction in the cost of merchandise inventories sold and the related inventory when recognized in the
consolidated statements of earnings and the consolidated balance sheets, respectively. Certain exceptions apply
if the consideration is a payment for assets or services delivered to the vendor or for reimbursement of selling
costs incurred to promote the vendor's products. The consideration is then recognized as a reduction of the cost
incurred in the consolidated statements of earnings.
Fixed Assets Fixed assets are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment
losses. Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset, expenditures to
prepare the asset for its intended use and capitalized borrowing costs. The commencement date for
capitalization of costs occurs when the Company first incurs expenditures for the qualifying assets and
undertakes the required activities to prepare the assets for their intended use.
Depreciation commences when the assets are available for use and is expensed on a straight-line basis through
operating income to depreciate the cost of these assets to their estimated residual value over their estimated
useful lives. When significant parts of a fixed asset have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate
components of the asset and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation methods, useful lives
and residual values are reviewed each year end and are adjusted if appropriate. Estimated useful lives of fixed
assets, including component parts, are as follows:
• Buildings – 10 to 40 years
• Equipment and fixtures – 2 to 16 years
• Building improvements – up to 10 years
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the lease term, which may include renewal options,
and their estimated useful lives to a maximum of 25 years. Fixed assets held under finance leases are
depreciated over the lesser of their expected useful lives, the same basis as owned assets, or the term of the
lease, unless it is reasonably certain that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term in
which case it would be depreciated over the life of the asset.
Fixed assets are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether there is any indication of
impairment. Refer to the Impairment of Non-Financial Assets significant accounting policy below.
Investment Properties Investment properties are properties owned by Loblaw that are held to either earn rental
income, for capital appreciation, or both. Loblaw's investment properties include single tenant properties held to
earn rental income and certain multiple tenant properties. Land and buildings leased to franchisees are not
accounted for as investment properties as these properties are related to Loblaw's operating activities.
Investment property assets are recognized at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated
impairment losses. The depreciation policies for investment properties are consistent with those described in the
significant accounting policy for fixed assets.
Investment properties are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine whether there is any indication of
impairment. Refer to the Impairment of Non-Financial Assets significant accounting policy below.
Borrowing Costs Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction, or production of fixed
assets, that necessarily take a substantial period of time to prepare for their intended use and a proportionate
share of general borrowings is capitalized to the cost of those fixed assets, until such time as the fixed assets are
substantially ready for their intended use based on the quarterly weighted average cost of borrowing.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 69
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Goodwill Goodwill arising in a business combination is recognized as an asset at the date that control is
acquired. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred over the fair value
of the identifiable assets acquired less the fair value of the liabilities assumed. Goodwill is tested for impairment
at least annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired. Refer to the Impairment of
Non-Financial Assets significant accounting policy below.
Intangible Assets The Company assesses intangible assets for legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive or other
factors to determine if the useful life is definite. Acquired intangible assets that have definite useful lives are
measured at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Intangible assets with a
definite life are amortized on a straight-line basis through operating income over their estimated useful lives,
ranging from 3 to 30 years.
Indefinite life intangible assets are measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Indefinite life
intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually and whenever there is an indication that the asset
may be impaired. Refer to the Impairment of Non-Financial Assets significant accounting policy below.
Impairment of Non-Financial Assets At each balance sheet date, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of
its definite life non-financial assets including fixed assets, investment properties and intangible assets to
determine whether there is any indication of impairment. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives are tested for impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be
impaired. If any indication of impairment exists, the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit (“CGU”) or
CGU grouping is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss, if any.
For the purposes of reviewing definite life non-financial assets for impairment, asset groups are reviewed at the
lowest level for which identifiable cash inflows are largely independent of cash inflows of other assets or groups
of assets. This grouping is referred to as a CGU. Weston Foods' manufacturing assets are grouped together at the
level of production categories which are capable of servicing their customers independently of other production
categories. Loblaw has determined that each retail location and each investment property is a separate CGU for
purposes of impairment testing.
The Company's corporate assets, which include the head office facilities and Loblaw distribution centres, do not
generate separate cash inflows. Corporate assets are tested for impairment at the minimum collection of CGUs
to which the corporate asset can be allocated reasonably and consistently.
Various impairment indicators relating to expectations of future cash flows are used to determine the need to
test a CGU for an impairment loss. Indicators to determine the need to test for an impairment loss on a Loblaw
retail location also include performance of a retail location below forecast and expectation of an adverse impact
on future performance of a retail location from competitive activities.
The recoverable amount of a CGU is the greater of its value in current use and its fair value less costs to sell.
Loblaw determines the value in use of its retail locations by discounting the expected cash flows that Loblaw
management estimates can be generated from continued use of the CGU. The process of determining the cash
flows requires Loblaw management to make estimates and assumptions including projected future sales,
earnings and capital investment, and discount rates.
Loblaw determines the fair value less costs to sell of its retail locations using various assumptions, including the
market rental rates for properties located within the same geographical areas as the properties being valued,
highest and best use of the property for the geographical area, recoverable operating costs for leases with
tenants, non-recoverable operating costs, discount rates, capitalization rates and terminal capitalization rates for
the purposes of determining the estimated net proceeds from the sale of the property.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of a CGU exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment
losses are recognized in operating income in the period in which they occur. If an impairment subsequently
reverses, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to the extent that the carrying value of the underlying
assets does not exceed the carrying amount, net of depreciation, that would have been determined if no
70 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
impairment had been recognized. Impairment reversals are recognized in operating income in the period in
which they occur.
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are assessed for impairment based on the group of CGUs
expected to benefit from the synergies of the business combination and the lowest level at which management
monitors the goodwill. Any potential impairment is identified by comparing the recoverable amount of the CGU
grouping to which the assets are allocated to its carrying value. If the recoverable amount, calculated as the
higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use, is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss
is recognized in operating income in the period in which it occurs. Impairment losses on goodwill are not
subsequently reversed if conditions change.
Provisions Provisions are recognized when there is a legal or constructive obligation for which it is probable that
a transfer of resources will be required to settle the obligation. The amount recognized as a provision is the
present value of the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the
reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.
Financial Instruments Financial assets and liabilities are recognized when the Company becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the financial instrument. Financial assets are derecognized when the contractual rights
to receive cash flows and benefits from the financial asset expire, or if the Company transfers the control or
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset to another party. Financial liabilities are
derecognized when obligations under the contract expire, are discharged or cancelled. Financial instruments
upon initial recognition are measured at fair value and classified as either financial assets or financial liabilities as
fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity investments, loans and receivables or other financial liabilities.
Financial instruments are included on the consolidated balance sheets and measured after initial recognition at
fair value, except for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity financial assets and other financial liabilities which
are measured at amortized cost. Fair values are based on quoted market prices where available from active
markets, otherwise fair values are estimated using valuation methodologies, primarily discounted cash flows
taking into account external market inputs where possible.
Gains and losses on fair value through profit or loss financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized in net
earnings before income taxes in the period in which they are incurred. Settlement date accounting is used to
account for the purchase and sale of financial assets. Gains or losses between the trade date and settlement
date on fair value through profit or loss financial assets are recorded in net earnings before income taxes and
other comprehensive income, respectively. Transaction costs other than those related to financial instruments
classified as fair value through profit or loss, which are expensed as incurred, are capitalized to the carrying
amount of the instrument and amortized using the effective interest method.
Impairment of Financial Instruments An assessment of whether there is objective evidence that a financial
asset or a group of financial assets is impaired is performed at each balance sheet date. A financial asset or
group of financial assets is considered to be impaired if one or more loss events that have an impact on the
future cash flows of the financial asset or group of assets occur after initial recognition of the financial asset and
the loss can be reliably measured. This assessment is performed on an individual financial asset basis or on a
portfolio of financial assets basis. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables
carried at amortized cost has occurred, the loss is based on the difference between the carrying amount of the
financial asset, or portfolio of financial assets, and the respective estimated future cash flows discounted at the
financial instruments' original effective interest rate and is recorded as an allowance for losses. If, in a
subsequent period, the impairment loss reverses, the previously recognized impairment is also reversed to the
extent of the impairment.
Derivative Instruments Financial derivative instruments in the form of cross currency swaps, interest rate swaps,
foreign exchange forwards, and equity swaps and forwards as well as non-financial derivatives in the form of
futures contracts, options contracts and forward contracts are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance
sheets. Any embedded derivative instruments that are identified are separated from their host contract and
recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Fair values are based on quoted market prices where
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 71
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
available from active markets, otherwise fair values are estimated using valuation methodologies, primarily
discounted cash flows taking into account external market inputs.
Derivative instruments are recorded in current or non-current assets and liabilities based on their remaining
terms to maturity. All changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are recorded in net earnings unless the
derivative qualifies and is effective as a hedging instrument in a designated hedging relationship.
Certain non-financial derivative instruments that were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of
the receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the Company's expected purchase, sale or
usage requirements are exempt from financial instrument accounting requirements (“own use exemption”). No
amounts are recorded in the consolidated financial statements related to these contracts until the associated
non-financial items are received by the Company.
Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency of the Company is the Canadian dollar.
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations that have a functional currency different from that of the
Company, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are translated into Canadian
dollars at the foreign currency exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting foreign currency
exchange gains or losses are recognized in the foreign currency translation adjustment as part of comprehensive
income. When such foreign operation is disposed of, the related foreign currency translation reserve is
recognized in net earnings as part of the gain or loss on disposal. On the partial disposal of such foreign
operation, the relevant proportion is reclassified to net earnings.
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations that have the same functional currency as the Company are translated
into Canadian dollars at the foreign currency exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting
foreign currency exchange gains or losses are recognized in operating income.
Revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the foreign currency
exchange rates that approximate the rates in effect at the dates when such items are transacted.
Short Term Employee Benefits Short term employee benefits include wages, salaries, compensated absences,
profit-sharing and bonuses. Short term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis
and are recognized in operating income as the related service is provided or capitalized if the service rendered is
in connection with the creation of a tangible or intangible asset. A liability is recognized for the amount expected
to be paid under short term cash bonus or profit-sharing plans if the Company has a present legal or constructive
obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee, and the obligation can be
estimated reliably.
Defined Benefit Plans The Company has a number of contributory and non-contributory defined benefit plans
providing pension and other benefits to eligible employees. The defined benefit pension plans provide a pension
based on length of service and eligible pay. The other defined benefits include health care, life insurance and
dental benefits provided to eligible employees who retire at certain ages having met certain service
requirements. The Company's net obligation in respect of defined benefits is calculated separately for each plan.
Defined benefit plan obligations are actuarially calculated by a qualified actuary at the balance sheet date using
the projected unit credit method. The actuarial valuations are determined based on management's best
estimate of the discount rate, the expected long term rate of return on plan assets, the rate of compensation
increase, retirement rates, termination rates, mortality rates and expected growth rate of health care costs. The
discount rate used to value the defined benefit plan obligation for accounting purposes is based on the yield on a
portfolio of Corporate AA bonds denominated in the same currency in which the benefits are expected to be
paid and with terms to maturity that, on average, match the terms of the defined benefit plan obligations. The
expected long term rate of return on plan assets is based on current market conditions, the asset mix, the active
management of defined benefit pension plan assets and historical returns. The expected growth rate in health
care costs is based on external data and the Company's historical trends for health care costs. Unrecognized past
service costs (see below) and the fair value of plan assets are deducted from the defined benefit plan obligations
to arrive at the net defined benefit plan obligations. The interest cost on the defined benefit plan obligation and
72 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
the expected return on plan assets as determined by the actuarial valuations are recognized in net interest
expense and other financing charges.
Past service costs arising from plan amendments are recognized in operating income in the year that they arise
to the extent that the associated benefits are fully vested. Unvested past service costs are recognized in
operating income on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the associated benefits.
For plans that resulted in a net defined benefit asset, the recognized asset is limited to the total of any
unrecognized past service costs plus the present value of economic benefits available in the form of future
refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan (the “asset ceiling”). In order to calculate
the present value of economic benefits, consideration is given to minimum funding requirements that apply to
the plan. If it is anticipated that the Company will not be able to recover the value of the net defined benefit
asset, after considering minimum funding requirements for future service, the net defined benefit asset is
reduced to the amount of the asset ceiling. The effect of the asset ceiling is recognized in other comprehensive
loss.
When the payment in the future of minimum funding requirements related to past service would result in a net
defined benefit surplus or an increase in a surplus, the minimum funding requirements are recognized as a
liability to the extent that the surplus would not be fully available as a refund or a reduction in future
contributions. Remeasurement of this liability is recognized in other comprehensive loss in the period in which
the remeasurement occurs.
At each balance sheet date, plan assets are measured at fair value and defined benefit plan obligations are
measured using assumptions which approximate their fair values at the reporting date, with the resulting
actuarial gains and losses from both of these measurements recognized in other comprehensive loss.
Defined Contribution Plans The Company maintains a number of defined contribution pension plans for
employees in which the Company pays fixed contributions for eligible employees into a registered plan and has
no further significant obligation to pay any further amounts. The amount of the pension benefit is based on
accumulated Company contributions and in most plans, employee contributions and investment gains and
losses. The costs of benefits for defined contribution plans are expensed as contributions are due.
Multi-Employer Pension Plans The Company participates in multi-employer pension plans (“MEPP”) which are
accounted for as defined contribution plans. The Company's responsibility to make contributions to these plans
is established pursuant to its collective agreements. The Company does not administer these plans, but rather,
the administration and the investment of their assets are controlled by a board of trustees generally consisting of
an equal number of union and employer representatives. The contributions made by the Company to MEPPs are
expensed as contributions are due.
Other Long Term Employee Benefit Plans The Company offers other long term employee benefits including
contributory long term disability benefits and non-contributory continuation of health care and dental benefits
to employees who are on long term disability leave. As the amount of the long term disability benefit does not
depend on length of service, the obligation is recognized when an event occurs that gives rise to an obligation to
make payments. The amount of other long term employee benefits is actuarially calculated by a qualified
actuary at the balance sheet date using the projected unit credit method. The discount rate used to value the
other long term employee benefit plan obligations is based on the yield on a portfolio of Corporate AA bonds
denominated in the same currency in which the benefits are expected to be paid and with terms to maturity
that, on average, match the terms of the other long term employee benefit plan obligations. The interest cost on
the other long term employee benefit plan obligations and the expected return on plan assets as determined by
the actuarial valuations are recognized in net interest expense and other financing charges. At each balance
sheet date, plan assets are measured at fair value and other long term employee benefit plan obligations are
measured using assumptions which approximate their fair values at the reporting date, with the resulting
actuarial gains and losses from both of these measurements recognized immediately in operating income. Past
service costs are recognized immediately in operating income in the period in which they arise.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 73
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Termination Benefits Termination benefits are recognized as an expense when the Company is demonstrably
committed, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to either terminate employment
before the normal retirement date, or to provide termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage
voluntary redundancy. Termination benefits for voluntary redundancies are recognized as an expense if the
Company has made an offer of voluntary redundancy, it is probable that the offer will be accepted, and the
number of acceptances can be estimated reliably. Benefits payable are discounted to their present value when
the effect of the time value of money is material.
Stock Option Plan Stock options issued by the Company are settled in common shares and are accounted for
as equity-settled stock options. These stock options vest in tranches over a three to five year period. The fair
value of each tranche of options granted to certain employees is measured separately at the grant date using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is recognized as an expense in operating income over the vesting period
of each tranche, with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus. During the vesting period the amount
recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect revised expectations about the number of options expected to
vest, such that the amount ultimately recognized as an expense is based on the number of options that meet the
vesting conditions. Upon exercise of vested options, the amount recognized in contributed surplus for the award
plus the cash received upon exercise is recognized as an increase in share capital.
Prior to February 22, 2011, stock options could be settled in shares or in the share appreciation value in cash at
the option of the employee. These options were accounted for as cash-settled stock options and vested in
tranches over a three to five year vesting period; accordingly, each tranche was valued separately using a Black-
Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of the amount payable to employees in respect of these plans was
remeasured at each balance sheet date, and a compensation expense was recognized in operating income over
the vesting period for each tranche with a corresponding change to the liability. Forfeitures were estimated at
the grant date and were revised to reflect a change in expected or actual forfeitures.
Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) Plan RSU grants entitle certain employees to a cash payment equal to the
weighted average price of a GWL or Loblaw common share on the TSX in the five trading days preceding the end
of a performance period, ranging from three to five years, following the date of the award multiplied by the
number of units that are vested. The Company recognizes a compensation expense in operating income for each
RSU granted equal to the market value of a GWL or Loblaw common share less the net present value of the
expected dividend stream at the date on which RSUs are awarded to each participant. The compensation
expense is prorated over the performance period reflecting changes in the market value of a GWL or Loblaw
common share until the end of the performance period. Forfeitures are estimated at the grant date and are
revised to reflect a change in expected or actual forfeitures.
Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) Plan PSU grants entitle certain employees to a cash payment equal to the
weighted average price of a GWL or Loblaw common share on the TSX in the five trading days preceding the end
of a three year performance period multiplied by the number of units that are vested. The number of units that
vest is based on the achievement of specified performance measures. The Company recognizes a compensation
expense in operating income for each PSU expected to vest equal to the market value of a GWL or Loblaw
common share less the net present value of the expected dividend stream at the date on which PSUs are
awarded to each participant. The compensation expense is prorated over the performance period reflecting
changes in the market value of a GWL or Loblaw common share and the number of PSUs expected to vest until
the end of the performance period based on the achievement of the associated performance measures.
Forfeitures are estimated at the grant date and are revised to reflect a change in expected or actual forfeitures.
Director Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) Plan Members of GWL's and Loblaw's Boards, who are not management,
are required to hold a portion of their retainers and fees in the form of DSUs until they satisfy their required level
of equity ownership. Holders of the DSUs earn dividends in the form of additional fractional DSUs during the
holding period. The fractional DSUs issued during the holding period are treated as additional awards. The
Company recognizes an expense in operating income for each DSU granted equal to the market value of a GWL
or Loblaw common share at the date on which DSUs are awarded with a corresponding change to the liability.
74 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
After the grant date, the DSU liability is remeasured for subsequent changes in the market value of a GWL or
Loblaw common share. The DSUs are settled upon termination of Board service.
Executive Deferred Share Unit (“EDSU”) Plan Under this plan, eligible executives may elect to defer up to 100%
of the Short Term Incentive Plan (“STIP”) earned in any year into the EDSU plan, subject to an overall cap of three
times the executive's base salary. Each EDSU entitles the holder to receive the cash equivalent of a GWL or
Loblaw common share, payable by December 15 of the year following the year in which the executive's
employment ceases for any reason. An election to participate in the plan in any year must be made before the
beginning of the year and is irrevocable. The number of EDSUs granted in respect of any year will be determined
by dividing the STIP compensation that is subject to the EDSU plan election by the market value of GWL or
Loblaw common shares on the date the STIP compensation would otherwise be payable. For this purpose, and
for purposes of determining the value of an EDSU upon conversion of the EDSUs into cash, the value of the
EDSUs is calculated by using the weighted average of the trading prices of GWL or Loblaw common shares on the
TSX for the five trading days prior to the valuation date. After the grant date, any change in fair value is
recognized in operating income in the period of the change with a corresponding change to the liability.
Employee Share Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) GWL and Loblaw maintain ESOPs for their employees, which allow
employees to acquire GWL and Loblaw common shares through regular payroll deductions of up to 5% of their
gross regular earnings. GWL and Loblaw contribute an additional 25% of each employee's contribution to their
respective plans, which is recognized in operating income as a compensation expense when the contribution is
made. The ESOPs are administered through a trust which purchases GWL and Loblaw common shares in the
open market on behalf of employees.
Accounting Standards Implemented in 2012
Financial Instruments – Disclosures In 2010, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments:
Disclosures”, which increase the disclosure requirements for transactions involving transfers of financial assets to
help users of the financial statements evaluate the risk exposures related to such transfers and the effect of
those risks on an entity's financial position. These amendments are effective and were implemented in the first
quarter of 2012.
Deferred Tax – Recovery of Underlying Assets In 2010, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 12, “Income
Taxes” (“IAS 12”), that introduce an exception to the general measurement requirements of IAS 12 for
investment properties measured at fair value. These amendments were effective in the first quarter of 2012. As
part of its transition to IFRS, the Company elected to account for its investment properties at cost and as such,
the amendments did not have an impact on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.
Note 3. Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments in applying the Company's accounting policies that affect the reported amounts and disclosures made
in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Within the context of these consolidated financial statements, a judgment is a decision made by management in
respect of the application of an accounting policy, a recognized or unrecognized financial statement amount and/
or note disclosure, following an analysis of relevant information that may include estimates and assumptions.
Estimates and assumptions are used mainly in determining the measurement of balances recognized or
disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and are based on a set of underlying data that may include
management's historical experience, knowledge of current events and conditions and other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management continually evaluates the estimates and
judgments it uses.
The following are the accounting policies subject to judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty that
the Company believes could have the most significant impact on the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements.
The Company's significant accounting policies are disclosed in note 2.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 75
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Inventories
Key sources of estimation Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value which requires the
Company to utilize estimates related to fluctuations in future retail prices, seasonality and costs necessary to sell
the inventory.
Impairment of non-financial assets (goodwill, intangible assets, fixed assets and investment properties)
Judgments made in relation to accounting policies applied Management is required to use judgment in
determining the grouping of assets to identify their CGUs for the purposes of testing fixed assets for impairment.
Judgment is further required to determine appropriate groupings of CGUs for the level at which goodwill and
intangible assets are tested for impairment. Loblaw has determined that each retail location and each
investment property is a separate CGU for purposes of impairment testing. For the purpose of goodwill and
intangible assets impairment testing, CGUs are grouped at the lowest level at which goodwill and intangible
assets are monitored for internal management purposes. In addition, judgment is used to determine whether a
triggering event has occurred requiring an impairment test to be completed.
Key sources of estimation In determining the recoverable amount of a CGU or a group of CGUs, various
estimates are employed. The Company determines fair value less costs to sell using such estimates as market
rental rates for comparable properties, recoverable operating costs for leases with tenants, non-recoverable
operating costs, discount rates, capitalization rates and terminal capitalization rates. The Company determines
value in use by using estimates including projected future sales, earnings, capital investment consistent with
strategic plans presented to GWL's and Loblaw's Boards. Discount rates are consistent with external industry
information reflecting the risk associated with the specific cash flows.
Franchise loan receivable and certain other financial assets
Judgments made in relation to accounting policies applied Management reviews franchise loans receivable,
trade receivables and certain other financial assets relating to their franchise business at each balance sheet
date utilizing judgment to determine whether a triggering event has occurred requiring an impairment test to be
completed.
Key sources of estimation Management determines the initial fair value of its franchise loans and certain other
financial assets using discounted cash flow models corroborated by other valuation techniques. The process of
determining these fair values requires management to make estimates of a long term nature regarding discount
rates, projected revenues and margins, as applicable, derived from past experience, actual operating results,
budgets and the Company's five year forecast.
Income and other taxes
Judgments made in relation to accounting policies applied The calculation of current and deferred income taxes
requires management to make certain judgments regarding the tax rules in jurisdictions where the Company
performs activities. Application of judgments is required regarding classification of transactions and in assessing
probable outcomes of claimed deductions including expectations about future operating results, the timing and
reversal of temporary differences and possible audits of income tax and other tax filings to the tax authorities.
Post-employment and other long term employee benefits
Key sources of estimation Accounting for the costs of defined benefit pension plans and other applicable post-
employment benefits is based on using a number of assumptions including estimates for expected return on
plan assets. Expected returns on plan assets is based on current market conditions, the asset mix, the active
management of defined benefit pension plan assets and historical returns. Other key assumptions for pension
obligations are based in part on actuarial determined data and current market conditions.
76 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Allowance for credit card receivables
Key sources of estimation The allowance is measured based upon statistical analysis that includes estimates for
past and current performance, aging, arrears status, the level of allowance already in place, and management's
interpretation of economic conditions and other trends specific to our customer base, including but not limited
to bankruptcies. Changes in circumstances may cause future assessments of credit risk to be materially different
from current assessments, which could require an increase or decrease in the allowance for credit card
receivables.
Note 4. Future Accounting Standards
Unless otherwise indicated, the Company intends to adopt the following standards in its consolidated financial
statements for the annual period beginning on January 1, 2013:
Consolidated Financial Statements In 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 10, “Consolidated Financial
Statements” (“IFRS 10”). This IFRS replaces portions of IAS 27, and supersedes SIC-12. IFRS 10 defines principles
of control and establishes the basis of determining when and how an entity should be included within a set of
consolidated financial statements. The standard introduces a single control model that requires an entity to
consolidate an investee when it has power, exposure to variability in returns and has the ability to use its power
over the investee to affect its returns, regardless of whether voting rights are present. The adoption of IFRS 10 is
not expected to have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities In 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 12, “Disclosure of Interests in Other
Entities” (“IFRS 12”). This IFRS requires extensive disclosures relating to a company's interests in subsidiaries,
joint arrangements, associates, and unconsolidated structured entities. IFRS 12 enables users of the consolidated
financial statements to evaluate the nature and risks associated with a company's interests in other entities and
the effects of those interests on a company's financial performance and position. The adoption of IFRS 12 is not
expected to have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Fair Value Measurement In 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13, “Fair Value Measurement” (“IFRS 13”), which
establishes a single framework for the fair value measurement and disclosure of financial and non-financial
assets and liabilities. The new standard unifies the definition of fair value and also introduces new concepts
including 'highest and best use' and 'principle markets' for non-financial assets and liabilities. There are
additional disclosure requirements, including increased fair value disclosure for financial instruments for interim
financial statements. Although the Company expects additional disclosure, it does not anticipate material
measurement impacts on its consolidated financial statements as a result of the adoption of IFRS 13.
Employee Benefits In 2011, the IASB revised IAS 19, “Employee Benefits” (“IAS 19”). The most significant
amendments for the Company will be the requirement to immediately recognize all unvested past service costs
and the replacement of interest cost and expected return on plan assets with a net interest amount that is
calculated by applying a prescribed discount rate to the net defined benefit liability. Upon implementation of
these amendments, the Company will restate its annual 2012 consolidated financial statements. The preliminary
expected impact arising from the adoption of the amendments to IAS 19 is summarized as follows:
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
Increase (decrease)
Operating income
Net interest expense and other financing charges
Income taxes
Net earnings
2012
1
24
(5)
(18)
$
$
$
$
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 77
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Increase (decrease)
Net earnings
Other comprehensive income
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Increase (decrease)
Other liabilities
Equity
2012
(18)
18
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
(2)
$
2
$
As a result, in 2013, post-employment and other long term employee benefits expense will be accounted for on
a consistent basis year-over-year. The amendments also require enhanced disclosures for defined benefit plans,
including additional information on the characteristics and risks of those plans.
Other Standards In addition to the above standards, the Company will be implementing the following standards
and amendments effective January 1, 2013: IFRS 11, “Joint Arrangements”; IAS 28, “Investments in Associates”;
and IAS 1, “Presentation of Financial Statements”. The Company does not expect a significant impact as a result
of these standards and amendments on its consolidated financial statements.
Financial Instruments In 2011, the IASB issued amendments to IFRS 7, “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” and
IAS 32, “Financial Instruments: Presentation”, these amendments are required to be applied for periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect any significant impacts on its consolidated
financial statements as a result of these amendments.
In 2010, the IASB issued a new standard, IFRS 9, “Financial Instruments” (“IFRS 9”), which will ultimately replace
IAS 39, “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” (“IAS 39”). The replacement of IAS 39 is a
three-phase project with the objective of improving and simplifying the reporting for financial instruments.
The issuance of IFRS 9 is the first phase of the project, which provides guidance on the classification and
measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. This standard becomes effective on January 1, 2015,
with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the new standard on its
consolidated financial statements.
78 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Note 5. Net Interest Expense and Other Financing Charges
The components of net interest expense and other financing charges were as follows:
Long term debt
Defined benefit and other long term employee benefit plan
$
obligations (note 25)
Borrowings related to credit card receivables
Independent funding trusts
Financial derivative instruments
Other financing charges(1)
Dividends on capital securities (note 21)
Capitalized interest (capitalization rate 6.4% (2011 – 6.4%))
Interest income:
Expected return on pension plan assets (note 25)
Other financing income(1)
Accretion income
Financial derivative instruments
Security deposits
Short term interest income
Net interest expense and other financing charges
$
2012
367
$
102
37
15
2
12
14
(1)
548
(94)
(18)
(2)
(17)
(131)
417
$
2011
368
108
41
16
14
(1)
546
(97)
(40)
(20)
(5)
(1)
(17)
(180)
366
(1) Other financing charges (income) for 2012 included a non-cash charge of $35 (2011 – non-cash income of $18) related to the fair
value adjustment of the forward sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares (see note 29). The fair value adjustment of
the forward sale agreement is non-cash and results from changes in the value of the underlying Loblaw shares. At maturity, any cash
paid under the forward sale agreement could be offset by the sale of the underlying Loblaw common shares. Also included in other
financing charges (income) is forward accretion income of $40 (2011 – $39) and the forward fee of $17 (2011 – $17) associated with
the forward sale agreement.
Note 6.
Income Taxes
The components of income taxes were as follows:
Current income taxes
Current period
Adjustment in respect of prior periods
Deferred income taxes
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Adjustment in respect of prior periods
Income taxes
Income tax recoveries recognized in other comprehensive loss were as follows:
Defined benefit plan actuarial losses (note 25)
Other comprehensive loss
2012
2011
$
$
$
$
285
(23)
(21)
8
249
2012
(8)
(8)
$
$
$
$
238
(12)
88
10
324
2011
(83)
(83)
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 79
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The effective income tax rates in the consolidated statements of earnings were reported at rates different than
the weighted average basic Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rates for the following reasons:
Weighted average basic Canadian federal and
provincial statutory income tax rate
Net (decrease) increase resulting from:
Earnings in jurisdictions taxed at rates different from
the Canadian statutory income tax rates
Unrecognized benefit of foreign currency translation losses
and the utilization of realized foreign currency losses
Non-taxable and non-deductible amounts (including capital
gains/losses and cash-settled stock options)
Impact of statutory income tax rate changes on deferred
income tax balances
Impact of resolution of certain income tax matters
from a previous year and other
Effective income tax rate applicable to
earnings before income taxes
2012
2011
25.9%
27.7%
(0.9)
1.2
0.8
(0.4)
(1.1)
(0.1)
(0.9)
0.1
(0.7)
25.5%
26.1%
In 2012, the Department of Finance substantively enacted amendments to the Income Tax Act relating to the
taxation of Canadian corporations with foreign affiliates. The Company is no longer able to recognize a net tax
benefit on realized foreign capital losses recognized by its foreign affiliates to the extent such losses cannot be
offset against realized foreign capital gains. In 2012, the Company (excluding Loblaw) expensed $8 in previously
recognized current tax assets relating to these amendments.
Deferred income tax assets as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 which were not recognized on the
consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
Deductible temporary differences
Income tax losses and credits
Unrecognized deferred income tax assets
2012
28
49
77
$
$
2011
22
32
54
$
$
The income tax losses and credits expire in the years 2013 to 2032. The deductible temporary differences do not
expire under current income tax legislation. Deferred income tax assets were not recognized in respect of these
items because it is not probable that future taxable income will be available to the Company to utilize the
benefits.
80 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities recognized on the consolidated balance sheets were attributable to the
following:
Trade and other payables
Other liabilities
Fixed assets
Goodwill and intangible assets
Other assets
Losses carried forward (expiring 2028 to 2032)
Other
Net deferred income tax assets
Recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as follows:
Deferred income tax assets
Deferred income tax liabilities
Net deferred income tax assets
Note 7. Basic and Diluted Net Earnings per Common Share
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company
Prescribed dividends on preferred shares in share capital
Net earnings available to common shareholders
Impact of GWL equity swaps
Reduction in net earnings due to dilution at Loblaw
Net earnings available to common shareholders for diluted
$
$
earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions)
Dilutive effect of share-based compensation(1) (in millions)
Dilutive effect of GWL equity swaps(1)
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (in millions)
Basic net earnings per common share ($)
Diluted net earnings per common share ($)
(in millions)
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
73
$
365
(343)
(13)
(131)
184
21
156
$
Dec. 31, 2011
76
$
338
(238)
(16)
(136)
90
21
135
$
$
$
316
(160)
156
2012
486
(44)
442
(2)
(5)
435
128.2
0.6
128.8
3.45
3.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
295
(160)
135
2011
635
(44)
591
(4)
587
129.0
0.1
129.1
4.58
4.55
(1) Excluded from the computation of diluted EPS were 1,184,840 (2011 – 1,915,191) potentially dilutive instruments, as they were
anti-dilutive.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 81
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8. Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short Term Investments and Security Deposits
The components of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits were as follows:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash
Cash equivalents:
Bankers’ acceptances
Government treasury bills
Bank term deposits
Corporate commercial paper
Government agency securities
Other
Cash and cash equivalents
Short Term Investments
Bankers’ acceptances
Government treasury bills
Corporate commercial paper
Government agency securities
Other
Short term investments
Security Deposits
Cash
Government treasury bills and notes
Government agency securities
Security deposits
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
250
$
Dec. 31, 2011
259
$
361
444
425
11
98
1,589
$
287
248
220
247
4
107
1,372
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
289
$
835
316
667
31
2,138
$
Dec. 31, 2011
239
$
921
615
586
1
2,362
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
135
$
169
44
348
$
Dec. 31, 2011
125
$
159
83
367
$
During 2012, GWL and Loblaw entered into agreements to cash collateralize certain uncommitted credit facilities
up to amounts of $45 (2011 – $40) and $133 (2011 – $88), respectively. As at year end 2012, $142 (2011 – $125)
was deposited with major financial institutions and classified as security deposits on the consolidated balance
sheets.
Note 9. Accounts Receivable
The following is an aging of the Company's accounts receivable:
As at
Current
> 30 days
> 60 days
Current
> 30 days
> 60 days
Dec. 31, 2012
Total
559 $
14 $
454 $
46 $
Dec. 31, 2011
Total
559
59 $
Accounts receivable $
493 $
52 $
82 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
The following are continuities of the Company's allowances for uncollectable accounts receivable:
Allowance, beginning of year
Net reversals (additions)
Allowance, end of year
2012
(119)
3
(116)
$
$
2011
(112)
(7)
(119)
$
$
Accounts receivable of $29 that were past due as at year end 2012 (2011 – $25) were not classified as impaired
as their past due status was reasonably expected to be remedied.
Note 10. Credit Card Receivables
The components of credit card receivables were as follows:
Gross credit card receivables
Allowance for credit card receivables
Credit card receivables
Securitized to Independent Securitization Trusts
Securitized to Eagle Credit Card Trust(1)
Securitized to Other Independent Securitization Trusts(2)
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
2,348
$
(43)
2,305
$
Dec. 31, 2011
2,138
$
(37)
2,101
$
$
$
600
905
$
$
600
905
(1) The Company consolidates Eagle as a SPE as defined in SIC-12. The associated liability of Eagle was recorded in long term debt and
long term debt due within one year.
(2) The associated liabilities of Other Independent Securitization Trusts were recorded in short term debt.
Loblaw, through PC Bank, participates in various securitization programs that provide the primary source of
funds for the operation of its credit card business. PC Bank sells credit card receivables to these Independent
Securitization Trusts, including Eagle and Other Independent Securitization Trusts, from time to time depending
on PC Bank’s financing requirements.
The credit card receivables associated with the Other Independent Securitization Trusts are not derecognized by
Loblaw since PC Bank is required to absorb a portion of the related credit card losses. As a result, Loblaw has not
transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards relating to these assets and continues to recognize these
assets in credit card receivables. The associated liabilities are secured by the credit card receivables and are
accounted for as financing transactions. The associated liabilities are included in short term debt based on their
characteristics and are carried at amortized cost (see note 18).
Loblaw has arranged letters of credit on behalf of PC Bank, representing 9% (2011 – 9%) of the outstanding
securitized liability for the benefit of the Other Independent Securitization Trusts in the amount of $81
(2011 – $81). In the event of a major decline in the income flow from or in the value of the securitized credit
card receivables, the Other Independent Securitization Trusts can draw upon these letters of credit to recover up
to a maximum of the amount outstanding on the letters of credit. Under its securitization programs, PC Bank is
required to maintain at all times a credit card receivable pool balance equal to a minimum of 107% of the
outstanding securitized liability and was in compliance with this requirement throughout the year.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 83
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following are continuities of Loblaw's allowances for credit card receivables:
Allowance, beginning of year
Provision for losses
Recoveries
Write-offs
Allowance, end of year
2012
(37)
(98)
(12)
104
(43)
$
$
2011
(34)
(87)
(14)
98
(37)
$
$
The allowance for credit card receivables recorded in credit card receivables on the consolidated balance sheets
is maintained at a level which is considered adequate to absorb credit related losses on credit card receivables.
The following is an aging of Loblaw's gross credit card receivables:
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
Gross credit card receivables
113 $
22 $ 2,348 $ 2,024 $
93 $
Current
$ 2,213 $
1-90 days > 90 days
past due
past due
Total
Current
1-90 days > 90 days
past due
past due
Total
21 $ 2,138
Credit card receivables are considered past due when a cardholder has not made a payment by the contractual
due date, taking into account a grace period. The amount of credit card receivables that fall within the grace
period is considered current. Credit card receivables past due but not impaired are those receivables that are
either less than 90 days past due or whose past due status was reasonably expected to be remedied. Any credit
card receivables with a payment that is contractually 180 days in arrears, or where the likelihood of collection is
considered remote, are written off.
Note 11. Inventories
The components of inventories were as follows:
Raw materials and supplies
Finished goods
Inventories
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
50
$
2,082
2,132
$
Dec. 31, 2011
46
$
2,101
2,147
$
For inventories recorded as at year end 2012, Loblaw recorded $14 (2011 – $20) for the write-down of
inventories below cost to net realizable value. The write-down was included in cost of inventories sold in the
consolidated statements of earnings. There were no reversals of previously recorded write-downs of inventories
during 2012 and 2011.
Cost of inventories sold in 2012 included income of $6 (2011 – a charge of $31) related to the fair value
adjustment of commodity derivatives at Weston Foods.
Note 12. Assets Held for Sale
Loblaw holds land and buildings that it intends to dispose of in the next 12 months as assets held for sale.
These assets were previously used in Loblaw's Retail segment. During 2012, impairment and other charges of
$1 (2011 – $3) were recognized on these properties. Also during 2012, Loblaw recorded a gain of $4 (2011 – $19)
from the sale of these assets.
84 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Note 13. Fixed Assets
The following is a continuity of the cost and accumulated depreciation of fixed assets for the year ended
December 31, 2012:
Equipment
and
fixtures
Buildings
and
leasehold
improvements
Land
Buildings
Finance
leases -
land,
buildings,
equipment
and fixtures
Assets
under
construction
Total
Cost, beginning of year
Additions
Disposals
Transfer to assets held for sale
Transfer (to) from investment properties
Transfer from assets under construction
Foreign exchange
Cost, end of year
Accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, beginning of year
Depreciation
Impairment losses
Reversal of impairment losses
Disposals
Transfer to assets held for sale
Transfer (to) from investment properties
Foreign exchange
Accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, end of year
Carrying amount as at:
December 31, 2012
$
$
$
$
$
1,686 $
6,549 $
23
(21)
(25)
1
271
(3)
6,795 $
6,157 $
36
(104)
633
(7)
6,715 $
736 $
22
(9)
55
511 $
73
(28)
(1)
804 $
555 $
1,032
666 $ 16,305
1,186
(170)
(34)
(3)
(971)
(10)
727 $ 17,274
(8)
(9)
(3)
12
1,678 $
9 $
2,236 $
4,236 $
400 $
245 $
7 $
7,133
2
(3)
(1)
186
32
(25)
(9)
(15)
4
(1)
536
7
(85)
(5)
47
4
(9)
43
4
(24)
1
812
49
(28)
(127)
(15)
4
(6)
7 $
2,408 $
4,689 $
442 $
269 $
7 $
7,822
1,671 $
4,387 $
2,026 $
362 $
286 $
720 $
9,452
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 85
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following is a continuity of the cost and accumulated depreciation of fixed assets for the year ended
December 31, 2011:
Equipment
and
fixtures
Buildings
and
leasehold
improvements
Land
Buildings
Finance
leases -
land,
buildings,
equipment
and fixtures
Assets
under
construction
Total
$
1,563 $
6,056 $
5,532 $
621 $
436 $
1,087 $
15,295
5
(1)
117
2
5
(6)
(9)
(3)
501
3
2
46
(91)
654
9
7
16
(7)
106
76
957
(1)
(1,378)
1,100
(104)
(4)
(5)
14
9
1,686 $
6,549 $
6,157 $
736 $
511 $
666 $
16,305
6 $
2,053 $
3,844 $
357 $
205 $
7 $
6,472
188
23
(30)
(6)
(3)
(2)
13
3
(3)
2
1
476
5
(1)
(74)
(17)
3
37
3
39
7
(6)
3
740
41
(34)
(86)
(1)
(2)
3
9 $
2,236 $
4,236 $
400 $
245 $
7 $
7,133
1,677 $
4,313 $
1,921 $
336 $
266 $
659 $
9,172
$
$
$
$
Cost, beginning of year
Additions
Disposals
Transfer from (to) assets held for sale
Transfer to investment properties
Transfer from assets under construction
Business acquisitions
Foreign exchange
Cost, end of year
Accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, beginning of year
Depreciation
Impairment losses
Reversal of impairment losses
Disposals
Transfer from (to) assets held for sale
Transfer to investment properties
Transfer to (from) assets under
construction
Foreign exchange
Accumulated depreciation and
impairment losses, end of year
Carrying amount as at:
December 31, 2011
Assets Held under Finance Leases The Company leases various land and buildings and equipment and fixtures
under a number of finance lease arrangements. As at year end 2012, the net carrying amount of leased land
and buildings was $259 (2011 – $223) and the net carrying amount of leased equipment and fixtures was
$27 (2011 – $43).
Assets under Construction The cost of additions to properties under construction for 2012 was $1,032
(2011 – $957). Included in this amount were capitalized borrowing costs of $1 (2011 – $1), with a weighted
average capitalization rate of 6.4% (2011 – 6.4%).
Security and Assets Pledged As at year end 2012, Loblaw had fixed assets with a carrying amount of
$191 (2011 – $194) which were encumbered by mortgages of $93 (2011 – $96).
Fixed Asset Commitments As at year end 2012, the Company had entered into commitments of $76
(2011 – $55) for the construction, expansion and renovation of buildings and the purchase of real property.
Impairment Losses In 2012, Loblaw recorded $49 (2011 – $39) of impairment losses on fixed assets in respect of
17 CGUs (2011 – 21 CGUs) in its Retail segment. Impairment losses are recorded where the carrying amount of
the retail location exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount was based on the greater of the
CGU's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Approximately 35% (2011 – 52%) of impaired CGUs had
carrying values which were $26 (2011 – $24) greater than their fair value less costs to sell. The remaining 65%
(2011 – 48%) of impaired CGUs had carrying values which were $23 (2011 – $15) greater than their value in use.
86 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
In 2012, Loblaw recorded $28 (2011 – $34) of impairment reversals on fixed assets in respect of 11 CGUs
(2011 – 17 CGUs) in its Retail segment. Impairment reversals are recorded where the recoverable amount of the
retail location exceeds its carrying amount. Approximately 55% (2011 – 71%) of CGUs with impairment reversals
had fair value less costs to sell which were $15 (2011 – $24) greater than their carrying values. The remaining
45% (2011 – 29%) of CGUs with impairment reversals had value in use which were $13 (2011 – $10) greater than
carrying values.
When determining the value in use of a retail location, Loblaw develops a discounted cash flow model for each
CGU. The duration of the cash flow projections for individual CGUs varies based on the remaining useful life of
the significant asset within the CGU. Sales forecasts for cash flows are based on actual operating results,
operating budgets, and long term growth rates that were consistent with industry averages, all of which is
consistent with strategic plans presented to Loblaw's Board. The estimate of the value in use of the relevant
CGUs was determined using a pre-tax discount rate of 8.0% to 8.5% at the end of 2012 (2011 – 8.75% to 9.25%).
In 2012, Weston Foods recorded accelerated depreciation of $4 (2011 – $3) related to restructuring activities and
a fixed asset impairment charge of nil (2011 – $2).
Note 14. Investment Properties
The following is a continuity of investment properties:
Cost, beginning of year
Disposals
Transfer from fixed assets
Transfer from assets held for sale
Cost, end of year
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, beginning of year
Depreciation
Impairment losses
Reversal of impairment losses
Transfer (to) from fixed assets
Transfer to assets held for sale
Accumulated depreciation, end of year
Carrying amount
Fair value
2012
158
3
8
169
76
2
1
(4)
(4)
(2)
69
$
$
$
2011
151
(1)
5
3
158
77
1
2
(6)
2
$
76
$
$
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
100
$
125
$
Dec. 31, 2011
82
$
109
$
During 2012, Loblaw recognized in operating income $5 (2011 – $5) of rental income and incurred direct
operating costs of $3 (2011 – $3) related to its investment properties. In addition, Loblaw recognized direct
operating costs of $1 (2011 – $1) related to its investment properties for which no rental income was earned.
An external, independent valuation company, having appropriate recognized professional qualifications and
recent experience in the location and category of property being valued, provided appraisals for certain of
Loblaw's investment properties. For the other investment properties, Loblaw determined the fair value by
relying on comparable market information and the independent manager of Loblaw's investment properties.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 87
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Where available, the fair values are based on market values, being the estimated amount for which a property
could be exchanged on the date of the valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm's length
transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably and willingly.
Where market values are not available, valuations are prepared using the income approach by considering the
estimated cash flows expected from renting out the property based on existing lease terms and where
appropriate, the ability to renegotiate the lease terms once the initial term or option term(s) expire plus the net
proceeds from a sale of the property at the end of the investment horizon.
The valuations of investment properties using the income approach include assumptions as to market rental
rates for properties of similar size and condition located within the same geographical areas, recoverable
operating costs for leases with tenants, non-recoverable operating costs, vacancy periods, tenant inducements
and capitalization rates for the purposes of determining the estimated net proceeds from the sale of the
property. As at year end 2012, the pre-tax discount rates used in the valuations for investment properties ranged
from 6.0% to 9.75% (2011 – 6.0% to 10.0%) and the terminal capitalization rates ranged from 5.75% to 8.75%
(2011 – 5.75% to 9.25%).
In 2012, Loblaw recorded impairment losses on investment properties of $1 (2011 – $2) and recorded reversals
of impairment losses on investment properties of $4 (2011 – $6) in operating income. The main factor
contributing to the impairment of investment properties was external economic factors.
Note 15. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following is a continuity of the cost and accumulated amortization of goodwill and intangible assets for the
year ended December 31, 2012:
Indefinite Life Intangible
Assets and Goodwill
Trademarks
and brand
names
Goodwill
Definite Life
Intangible Assets
Internally
generated
intangible
assets
Trademarks
and brand
names
Other
intangible
assets
$
2,425 $
$
20 $
23 $
51
11
62
$
$
$
$
(5)
(3)
2,417 $
1,062
$
$
$
$
20 $
23 $
8 $
6
4 $
1
14 $
5 $
1,062
1,355 $
62
6 $
18 $
130
146
32
(4)
5
(3)
176
36
14
(4)
46
Total
2,665
43
(4)
(6)
2,698
1,110
21
(4)
1,127
1,571
$
$
$
$
$
Cost, beginning of year
Additions
Write-off cost of fully amortized assets
Reclassification
Impact of foreign currency translation
Cost, end of year
Accumulated amortization and
impairment losses, beginning of year
Amortization
Write-off amortization of fully
amortized assets
Accumulated amortization and
impairment losses, end of year
Carrying amount as at:
December 31, 2012
88 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
The following is a continuity of the cost and accumulated amortization of goodwill and intangible assets for the
year ended December 31, 2011:
Indefinite Life Intangible
Assets and Goodwill
Trademarks
and brand
names
Goodwill
Definite Life
Intangible Assets
Internally
generated
intangible
assets
Trademarks
and brand
names
Other
intangible
assets
51
$
18 $
2
23 $
2,415 $
7
3
2,425 $
1,062
Cost, beginning of year
Additions
Write-off cost of fully amortized assets
Impact of foreign currency translation
Cost, end of year
Accumulated amortization and
impairment losses, beginning of year
Amortization
Write-off amortization of fully
amortized assets
Accumulated amortization and
impairment losses, end of year
Carrying amount as at:
December 31, 2011
$
$
$
$
$
20 $
23 $
2 $
6
3 $
1
8 $
4 $
51
$
$
$
$
1,062
1,363 $
51
12 $
19 $
110
143
4
(3)
2
146
29
10
(3)
36
Total
2,650
13
(3)
5
2,665
1,096
17
(3)
1,110
1,555
$
$
$
$
$
During 2012, Loblaw had goodwill and intangible asset additions of $43 (2011 – $14), of which $31 (2011 – nil)
was related to the purchase of prescription files from 106 Zellers Inc. stores, which were classified as definite life
intangible assets.
Indefinite Life Intangible Assets and Goodwill
For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, the Company's CGUs were grouped at the lowest level at which
goodwill was monitored for internal management purposes. The carrying amount of goodwill attributed to each
CGU grouping was as follows:
Fresh and Frozen – Weston Foods
Quebec region – Loblaw
T&T Supermarket Inc.
Other
Carrying amount of goodwill
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
252
$
700
129
274
1,355
$
Dec. 31, 2011
255
$
700
129
279
1,363
$
The indefinite life intangible assets include trademark and brand names recorded by Loblaw resulting from the
acquisition of T&T Supermarket Inc. (“T&T”).
The Company completed its 2012 and 2011 annual goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets impairment tests
and concluded that there was no impairment.
Key Assumptions The key assumptions used to calculate the recoverable amount for the fair value less costs to
sell are those regarding discount rates, growth rates and expected changes in margins.
Cash flow projections were discounted using a range of rates derived from the Company's after-tax weighted
average cost of capital adjusted for specific risks relating to each CGU. As at year end 2012, the after-tax discount
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 89
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
rates used in the recoverable amount calculations were approximately 9.5% (2011 – 7.0% to 9.5%). The pre-tax
discount rates ranged from 12.8% to 13.0% (2011 – 9.4% to 12.8%).
The Company included a minimum of five years of cash flows in its discounted cash flow model. The cash flow
forecasts were extrapolated beyond the five year period using estimated long term growth rates ranging from
0.9% to 2.0% (2011 – 1.5% to 2.0%). The budgeted adjusted EBITDA growth is based on the Company's five year
strategic plan approved by GWL's and Loblaw's Boards.
Sensitivity to Changes in Key Assumptions For the T&T CGU, two key assumptions were identified by Loblaw
that, if changed, could cause the carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount. A change in the discount
rate or terminal growth rate of approximately 75 basis points or 125 basis points (2011 – 75 basis points or
125 basis points), respectively, would cause the estimated recoverable amount to equal the carrying amount.
The values assigned to the key assumptions represent Loblaw's assessment of the future performance of T&T
and were based on both external and internal sources of information.
The Company does not believe that any changes in other key assumptions would have a significant impact on the
determination of the recoverable amount of the Company's other CGUs to which goodwill is allocated.
Definite Life Intangible Assets
The Company completed its assessments of impairment indicators for definite life intangible assets and
concluded that there were no indications of impairment during 2012 and 2011.
Note 16. Other Assets
The components of other assets were as follows:
Fair value of equity forward (note 29)
Sundry investments and other receivables
Fair value of cross currency swaps (note 29)
Other
Other assets
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
483
$
159
98
41
781
$
Dec. 31, 2011
478
$
166
103
42
789
$
90 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Note 17. Provisions
Provisions consist primarily of amounts recorded in respect of restructuring, self-insurance, commodity taxes,
environmental and decommissioning liabilities, onerous lease arrangements and a MEPP withdrawal liability.
The following are continuities relating to the Company's provisions:
Provisions, beginning of year
Additions
Payments
Reversals
Impact of foreign currency translation
Provisions, end of year
Carrying amount of provisions recorded in:
Current provisions
Non-current provisions
Provisions
2012
161
107
(41)
(9)
(1)
217
$
$
2011
187
72
(74)
(26)
2
161
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
$
$
123
94
217
$
$
67
94
161
The Company's accrued insurance liabilities were $73 (2011 – $85), of which $48 (2011 – $59) was included in
non-current provisions and $25 (2011 – $26) in current provisions. Included in total accrued insurance liabilities
were $35 (2011 – $45) of U.S. workers' compensation liabilities. The related cost and accrued workers'
compensation liabilities are based on actuarial valuations which are dependent on assumptions determined by
management. The discount rate used in determining the 2012 workers' compensation cost and liability was
3.50% (2011 – 3.50%). The total workers' compensation liability is equal to the ultimate actuarial loss estimate
less any actual losses paid to date. Any change in the workers' compensation liability is recognized immediately
in operating income.
The U.S. workers' compensation cost associated with the worker's compensation liabilities was $5 in 2012
(2011 – $5).
During 2012, Loblaw reduced a number of head office and administrative positions, affecting approximately 700
positions. Loblaw recorded a charge of $61 to reflect the costs of these reductions. As at year end 2012, $45 was
included in provisions and $6 was included in other liabilities related to this charge.
During 2012, Weston Foods withdrew from one of the U.S. MEPPs in which it participated. As a result, the
Company was subject to and paid a withdrawal liability. Also during 2012, another participating employer
withdrew from the plan and a mass withdrawal was triggered. As a result of the mass withdrawal the Company is
subject to an incremental withdrawal liability. Until the current actuarial valuation is made available, the actual
amount of the incremental withdrawal liability is unknown. Management's estimate of this liability is
approximately $17. This liability was recorded in 2012 and is presented in current provisions and selling, general
and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of
earnings, respectively.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 91
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 18. Short Term Debt
The components of short term debt were as follows:
Other Independent Securitization Trusts
Series B Debentures(2)
Short term debt
(note 10)
(1)
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
905
$
414
1,319
$
Dec. 31, 2011
905
$
375
1,280
$
(1) The outstanding short term debt balances relate to the associated liabilities of the independent securitization trusts, excluding Eagle
which is included in long term debt (see note 19). During 2012, PC Bank amended and extended the maturity date for two of its
independent securitization trust agreements from the third quarter of 2013 to the second quarter of 2015, with all other terms and
conditions remaining substantially the same.
During 2012, PC Bank did not securitize any credit card receivables (2011 – $370). In addition to PC Bank's securitized credit card
receivables, the independent securitization trusts' recourse is limited to standby letters of credit arranged by Loblaw as at year end
2012 of $81 (2011 – $81) which is based on a portion of the securitized amount (see note 32).
(2) Series B Debentures issued by GWL are due on demand, and pay a current weighted average interest rate of 1.79% (2011 – 1.78%).
The Series A, 7.00% (see note 19) and Series B Debentures are secured by a pledge of 9.6 million Loblaw common shares.
92 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Note 19. Long Term Debt
The components of long term debt were as follows:
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
George Weston Limited
Debentures
Series A, 7.00%, due 2031(i)
Notes
5.05%, due 2014
3.78%,
7.10%,
6.69%,
due 2016(ii)
due 2032
due 2033
Loblaw Companies Limited
Notes
due 2013
5.40%,
due 2014
6.00%,
due 2014
4.85%,
due 2016
7.10%,
due 2020
5.22%,
due 2027
6.65%,
due 2028
6.45%,
6.50%,
due 2029
11.40%, due 2031
Principal
Effect of coupon repurchase
6.85%,
6.54%,
8.75%,
6.05%,
6.15%,
5.90%,
6.45%,
7.00%,
5.86%,
due 2032
due 2033
due 2033
due 2034
due 2035
due 2036
due 2039
due 2040
due 2043
U.S. Private placement notes
6.48%,
6.86%,
due 2013 (U.S. $150)
due 2015 (U.S. $150)
Long term debt secured by mortgage
5.49%,
due 2018 (note 13)
Guaranteed investment certificates(iii)
due 2013 – 2017 (0.85% – 3.78%)
Independent securitization trusts(iv)
Eagle, 2.88%, due 2013
Eagle, 3.58%, due 2015
Independent funding trusts(v)
Finance lease obligations (note 28)
Transaction costs and other
Total long term debt
Less – amount due within one year
Long term debt
$
466
$
200
350
150
100
200
100
350
300
350
100
200
175
151
(76)
200
200
200
200
200
300
200
150
55
150
150
88
303
466
200
350
150
100
200
100
350
300
350
100
200
175
151
(85)
200
200
200
200
200
300
200
150
55
153
153
91
276
250
350
459
366
(4)
6,933
(672)
6,261
$
250
350
424
334
1
6,844
(87)
6,757
$
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 93
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The schedule of repayment of long term debt, based on maturity, is as follows: 2013 – $672; 2014 – $1,179;
2015 – $545; 2016 – $782; 2017 – $96; thereafter – $3,667. See note 29 for the fair value of long term debt.
The Series A, 7.00% and Series B Debentures (see note 18) are secured by a pledge of 9.6 million Loblaw
(i)
common shares.
During 2011, GWL issued $350 principal amount of unsecured Medium Term Notes (“MTN”), Series 2-A
(ii)
pursuant to its MTN, Series 2 program. Series 2-A notes pay a fixed rate of interest of 3.78% per annum payable
semi-annually until maturity on October 25, 2016. The notes are unsecured obligations of GWL and rank equally
with all the unsecured indebtedness of GWL that has not been subordinated. The notes may be redeemed at the
option of GWL, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, upon not less than 30 days and not more than
60 days notice to the holders of the notes.
During 2012, PC Bank sold $76 (2011 – $264) in guaranteed investment certificates (“GICs”) through
(iii)
independent brokers. In addition, during 2012, $49 (2011 – $6) of GICs matured and were repaid. As at year end
2012, Loblaw recorded in long term debt $303 (2011 – $276) of outstanding GICs, of which $36 (2011 – $46) was
recorded as long term debt due within one year.
The notes issued by Eagle are MTNs which are collateralized by PC Bank's credit card receivables (see
(iv)
note 10). During 2011, Eagle repaid the $500 senior and subordinated notes due March 17, 2011.
During 2012, Loblaw amended and increased the size of the revolving committed credit facility that is
(v)
the source of funding to the independent funding trusts from $475 to $575. Other terms and conditions remain
substantially the same. This facility bears interest at variable rates and expires in 2014. As at year end 2012, the
independent funding trusts had drawn $459 (2011 – $424) from this committed credit facility.
Loblaw provides credit enhancement in the form of a standby letter of credit for the benefit of the independent
funding trusts representing not less than 10% (2011 – 10%) of the principal amount of the loans outstanding. As
at year end 2012, Loblaw had provided a letter of credit in the amount of $48 (2011 – $48).
During 2011, GWL's $300 6.45% MTN due October 24, 2011 matured and was repaid.
During 2011, Loblaw's $350 6.5% MTN due January 19, 2011 matured and was repaid.
Loblaw Committed Credit Facility
During 2012, Loblaw renewed and extended its existing $800 committed credit facility to March 2017. Interest is
based on a floating rate, primarily the bankers' acceptance rate and an applicable margin based on Loblaw's
credit rating. As at year end 2012, Loblaw was in compliance with all of its covenants (see note 24). Also, as at
year end 2012 and 2011, there were no amounts drawn upon this credit facility.
Note 20. Other Liabilities
The components of other liabilities were as follows:
Defined benefit plan liability (note 25)
Other long term employee benefit liability
Deferred vendor allowances
Share-based compensation liability (note 26)
Other
Other liabilities
94 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
596
$
127
24
36
162
945
$
Dec. 31, 2011
674
$
130
32
24
173
1,033
$
Note 21. Capital Securities ($ except where otherwise indicated)
Loblaw has 9.0 million 5.95% non-voting Second Preferred Shares, Series A, outstanding (authorized –
12.0 million), with a face value of $225 million, which were issued for net proceeds of $218 million, and entitle
the holder to a fixed cumulative preferred cash dividend of $1.4875 per share per annum which, if declared, will
be payable quarterly. These preferred shares which are presented as capital securities on the consolidated
balance sheets are classified as other financial liabilities, and measured using the effective interest method.
On and after July 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, Loblaw may at its option redeem for cash, in whole or in part, these
outstanding preferred shares at $25.75, $25.50 and $25.00 per share, respectively. On and after July 31, 2013,
Loblaw may at its option convert these preferred shares into that number of common shares of Loblaw
determined by dividing the then applicable redemption price, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to
but excluding the date of conversion, by the greater of $2.00 per share and 95% of the then current market price
of the common shares. On and after July 31, 2015, these outstanding preferred shares are convertible, at the
option of the holder, into that number of common shares of Loblaw determined by dividing $25.00 per share,
together with accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the date of conversion, by the greater of $2.00 per
share and 95% of the then current market price of the common shares. This option is subject to Loblaw's right to
redeem the preferred shares for cash or arrange for their sale to substitute purchasers.
Dividends on capital securities are presented in net interest expense and other financing charges in the
consolidated statements of earnings (see note 5).
Note 22. Share Capital ($ except where otherwise indicated)
The components of share capital were as follows:
($ millions)
Common share capital
Preferred shares, Series I
Preferred shares, Series III
Preferred shares, Series IV
Preferred shares, Series V
Share capital
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
136
$
228
196
197
196
953
$
Dec. 31, 2011
133
$
228
196
197
196
950
$
Common Share Capital (authorized – unlimited)
The changes in the common shares issued and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2012 and
December 31, 2011 were as follows:
($ millions)
Issued and outstanding, beginning of year
Issued from treasury(1)
Purchased for cancellation
Issued and outstanding, end of year
Weighted average outstanding
2012
Common
Share Capital
133
$
3
$
$
136
Number of
Common Shares
128,188,843
42,210
(9,212)
128,221,841
128,189,901
Number of
Common Shares
129,073,662
17,560
(902,379)
128,188,843
129,015,579
2011
Common
Share Capital
133
1
(1)
133
$
$
$
$
(1) Share capital includes $3 million (2011 – $1 million) issued for stock options exercised (see note 26).
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 95
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Preferred Shares, Series I (authorized – 10.0 million)
GWL has 9.4 million 5.80% non-voting Preferred Shares, Series I outstanding, with a face value of $235 million,
which entitle the holder to a fixed cumulative preferred cash dividend of $1.45 per share per annum which will,
if declared, be payable quarterly. GWL may, at its option, redeem for cash, in whole or in part, these outstanding
preferred shares at $25.00 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date.
At any time after issuance, GWL may, at its option, give the holders of these preferred shares the right, at the
option of the holder, to convert their preferred shares into preferred shares of a further series designated by
GWL on a share-for-share basis on a date specified by GWL.
Preferred Shares, Series III (authorized – 10.0 million)
GWL has 8.0 million 5.20% non-voting Preferred Shares, Series III outstanding, with a face value of $200 million,
which entitle the holder to a fixed cumulative preferred cash dividend of $1.30 per share per annum which will,
if declared, be payable quarterly. On or after July 1, 2012, GWL may, at its option, redeem for cash, in whole or in
part, these outstanding preferred shares as follows:
On or after July 1, 2012 at $25.50 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date;
On or after July 1, 2013 at $25.25 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date; and
On or after July 1, 2014 at $25.00 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date.
At any time after issuance, GWL may, at its option, give the holders of these preferred shares the right, at the
option of the holder, to convert their preferred shares into preferred shares of a further series designated by
GWL on a share-for-share basis on a date specified by GWL.
Preferred Shares, Series IV (authorized – 8.0 million)
GWL has 8.0 million 5.20% non-voting Preferred Shares, Series IV outstanding, with a face value of $200 million,
which entitle the holder to a fixed cumulative preferred cash dividend of $1.30 per share per annum which will,
if declared, be payable quarterly. On or after October 1, 2012, GWL may, at its option, redeem for cash, in whole
or in part, these outstanding preferred shares as follows:
On or after October 1, 2012 at $25.50 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date;
On or after October 1, 2013 at $25.25 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date; and
On or after October 1, 2014 at $25.00 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date.
At any time after issuance, GWL may, at its option, give the holders of these preferred shares the right, at the
option of the holder, to convert their preferred shares into preferred shares of a further series designated by
GWL on a share-for-share basis on a date specified by GWL.
Preferred Shares, Series V (authorized – 8.0 million)
GWL has 8.0 million 4.75% non-voting Preferred Shares, Series V outstanding, with a face value of $200 million,
which entitle the holder to a fixed cumulative preferred cash dividend of $1.1875 per share per annum which
will, if declared, be payable quarterly. On or after July 1, 2012, GWL may, at its option, redeem for cash, in whole
or in part, these outstanding preferred shares as follows:
On or after July 1, 2012 at $25.75 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date;
On or after July 1, 2013 at $25.50 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date;
On or after July 1, 2014 at $25.25 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date; and
96 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
On or after July 1, 2015 at $25.00 per share, together with all accrued and unpaid dividends to the
redemption date.
At any time after issuance, GWL may, at its option, give the holders of these preferred shares the right, at the
option of the holder, to convert their preferred shares into preferred shares of a further series designated by
GWL on a share-for-share basis on a date specified by GWL.
Dividends
During 2012, the Company amended its dividend policy to state: the declaration and payment of dividends on
the Company's common shares and the amount thereof are at the discretion of the Board which takes into
account the Company's financial results, capital requirements, available cash flow, future prospects of the
Company's business and other factors considered relevant from time to time. Over the long term, it is the
Company's intention to increase the amount of the dividend while retaining appropriate free cash flow to
finance future growth. Also during 2012, the Board raised the quarterly common share dividend by $0.02 per
share to $0.38 per share. The Board declared dividends as follows:
($)
Common shares
Preferred shares – Series I
Preferred shares – Series III
Preferred shares – Series IV
Preferred shares – Series V
2012
1.46
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
2011
1.44
1.45
1.30
1.30
1.19
$
$
$
$
$
Subsequent to year end 2012, common share dividends of $0.38 (2011 – $0.36) per share and preferred share
dividends of $0.32 (2011 – $0.32) per share for the Series III and Series IV preferred shares and dividends of
$0.30 (2011 – $0.30) per share for the Series V preferred shares, payable on April 1, 2013, were declared by the
Board. In addition, dividends of $0.36 (2011 – $0.36) per share for the Series I preferred shares, payable on
March 15, 2013, were also declared.
Normal Course Issuer Bid (“NCIB”) Program
In 2012, GWL renewed its NCIB program to purchase on the TSX or enter into equity derivatives to purchase up
to 6,409,499 of its common shares, representing approximately 5% of the common shares outstanding. In
accordance with the rules and regulations of the TSX, any purchases must be at the then market prices of such
shares. During 2012, GWL purchased for cancellation 9,212 (2011 – 902,379) of its common shares for $1 million
(2011 – $61 million). The premium of $1 million (2011 – $60 million) paid on common shares purchased for
cancellation was recorded in retained earnings.
Note 23. Subsidiary Capital Transactions
During 2012, Loblaw purchased for cancellation 423,705 (2011 – 1,021,986) of its common shares. As a result,
contributed surplus decreased by $4 (2011 – $10).
During 2012, Loblaw issued 718,544 (2011 – 686,794) of its common shares in connection with its stock option
plan (see note 26). As a result, contributed surplus increased by $8 (2011 – $9).
During 2011, Loblaw issued 938,984 common shares to GWL under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”). As
a result of the Company's participation in the DRIP, the Company's proportional ownership of Loblaw increased,
resulting in a decrease to contributed surplus of $4. The Loblaw Board approved the discontinuance of the DRIP
following the dividend payment on April 1, 2011.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 97
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 24. Capital Management
In order to manage its capital structure, the Company, among other activities, may adjust the amount of
dividends paid to shareholders, purchase shares for cancellation pursuant to its NCIB program, issue new shares
or issue or repay long term debt with the objective of:
• ensuring sufficient liquidity is available to support its financial obligations and to execute its operating and
strategic plans;
• maintaining financial capacity and flexibility through access to capital to support future development of the
business;
• minimizing the after-tax cost of its capital while taking into consideration current and future industry, market
and economic risks and conditions;
• utilizing short term funding sources to manage its working capital requirements and long term funding
sources to manage the long term capital expenditures of the business; and
targeting credit rating metrics consistent with those of investment grade companies.
•
The Company has policies in place which govern debt financing plans and risk management strategies for
liquidity, interest rates and foreign exchange. These policies outline measures and targets for managing capital,
including a range for leverage consistent with the desired credit rating. Management and the Audit Committee
regularly review the Company's compliance with, and performance against, these policies. In addition,
Management regularly reviews these policies to ensure they remain consistent with the risk tolerance
acceptable to the Company.
On May 25, 2011, GWL filed a Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus (“Prospectus”) allowing for the issuance of up to
$1.5 billion in unsecured debentures and/or preferred shares over a 25-month period subject to the availability
of funding in capital markets. On June 25, 2011, GWL filed a Prospectus Supplement to this Prospectus creating
an MTN program pursuant to which it may issue unsecured debentures of up to $1.0 billion. During 2011, GWL
issued $350 principal amount of five-year unsecured MTN, Series 2-A pursuant to this MTN, Series 2 program
(see note 19).
In December 2012, Loblaw filed a Prospectus which expires in 2015, allowing for the potential issuance of up to
$1.0 billion of unsecured debentures and/or preferred shares subject to the availability of funding in capital
markets. Loblaw had filed a similar Prospectus in 2010 that expired in 2012. Loblaw has not issued any
instruments under either of the expired or new Prospectus.
As at year end 2012 and 2011, the items that the Company includes in its definition of capital were as follows:
As at
Bank indebtedness
Short term debt
Long term debt due within one year
Long term debt
Certain other liabilities
Fair value of financial derivatives related to the above debt
Total debt
Capital securities
Equity attributable to shareholders of the Company
Total capital under management
Dec. 31, 2012
$
$
$
1,319
672
6,261
39
(440)
7,851
223
5,692
13,766
98 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Dec. 31, 2011
3
$
1,280
87
6,757
39
(425)
7,741
222
5,459
13,422
$
$
Covenants and Regulatory Requirements
Loblaw has certain key financial and non-financial covenants under its existing $800 committed credit facility and
certain MTNs, U.S. Private Placement notes, and letters of credit. The key financial covenants include interest
coverage ratios as well as leverage ratios, as defined in the respective agreements. These ratios are measured by
Loblaw on a quarterly basis to ensure compliance with the agreements. During 2011, Loblaw amended these
agreements to include certain relevant IFRS adjustments in computing the financial metrics used in calculating
Loblaw's financial covenants. These amendments largely served to neutralize the impact of IFRS on covenant
calculations as at the date of conversion to IFRS. As at year end 2012, Loblaw was in compliance with each of the
covenants under these agreements.
Loblaw is also subject to externally imposed capital requirements from the Office of the Superintendent of
Financial Institutions (“OSFI”), the primary regulator of PC Bank. PC Bank's capital management objectives are to
maintain a consistently strong capital position while considering its economic risks generated by its credit card
receivables portfolio and to meet all regulatory capital requirements as defined by OSFI. PC Bank is subject to the
Basel II regulatory capital management framework which includes a Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0% and a total capital
ratio of 10.0%. PC Bank has exceeded all applicable capital requirements as at year end 2012.
Loblaw is also subject to externally imposed capital requirements through its subsidiary Glenhuron Bank Limited
(“Glenhuron”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Loblaw, which is regulated by the Central Bank of Barbados.
Glenhuron is regulated under Basel I which requires Glenhuron's assets to be risk weighted and the minimum
ratio of capital to risk weighted assets to be 8.0%. Glenhuron's ratio of capital to risk weighted assets exceeded
the minimum requirements under Basel I as at year end 2012.
In addition, the Company has wholly owned subsidiaries that engage in insurance related activities. These
subsidiaries each exceeded the minimum regulatory capital and surplus requirements as at year end 2012.
Note 25. Post-Employment and Other Long Term Employee Benefits
Post-Employment Benefits
The Company sponsors a number of pension plans, including registered funded defined benefit pension plans,
registered defined contribution pension plans and supplemental unfunded arrangements providing pension
benefits in excess of statutory limits. Certain obligations of the Company under these supplemental pension
arrangements are secured by a standby letter of credit issued by a major Canadian chartered bank. The
Company's defined benefit pension plans are predominantly non-contributory and these benefits are, in general,
based on career average earnings subject to limits.
The Company also offers certain other defined benefit plans other than pension plans. These other defined
benefit plans are generally not funded, are mainly non-contributory and include health care, life insurance and
dental benefits. Employees eligible for these other defined benefits are those who retire at certain ages having
met certain service requirements. The majority of other defined benefit plans for current and future retirees
include a limit on the total benefits payable by the Company.
In Canada, the Company also has a national defined contribution plan for salaried employees. All newly hired
salaried employees are only eligible to participate in this defined contribution plan.
The Company also contributes to various MEPPs, which are administered by a board of trustees. The Company's
responsibility to make contributions to these plans is established pursuant to its collective agreements. During
2012, Weston Foods withdrew from one of the U.S. MEPPs in which it participated. As a result, the Company was
subject to and paid a withdrawal liability. Also during 2012, another participating employer withdrew from the
plan and a mass withdrawal was triggered (see note 17).
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 99
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Other Long Term Employee Benefits
The Company offers other long term employee benefit plans that include long term disability benefits and
continuation of health care and dental benefits while on disability.
(i) Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Other Defined Benefit Plans
Information on the Company's defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit plans, in aggregate, is
summarized as follows:
Present value of funded obligations
Fair value of plan assets
Status of funded obligations
Present value of unfunded obligations
Total funded status of obligations
Unrecognized past service credit
Liability arising from minimum
$
$
$
funding requirement for past service
Total net defined benefit plan obligation
Recorded on the consolidated
balance sheets as follows:
Other liabilities (note 20)
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
$
$
(253)
(253)
(2)
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
(1,942)
1,621
(321)
(117)
(438)
$
$
$
Dec. 31, 2011
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
$
$
(235)
(235)
(1)
$
(255)
$
(438)
$
(236)
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
(2,066)
1,847
(219)
(119)
(338)
(3)
(341)
(341)
$
(255)
$
(438)
$
(236)
100 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
The following are the continuities of the fair value of plan assets and the present value of the defined benefit
plan obligations:
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
2012
Total
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
2011
Total
Changes in the fair value of plan assets
Fair value, beginning of year
Employer contributions
Employee contributions
Benefits paid
Expected return on plan assets
Actuarial gains (losses) in other
comprehensive loss
Other
Fair value, end of year
Changes in the present value of the
defined benefit plan obligations
Balance, beginning of year
Current service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Employee contributions
Actuarial losses in other
comprehensive loss
Plan amendments(1)
Contractual termination benefits(2)
Special termination benefits(2)
Other
$ 1,621
182 $
3
(124)
94
72
(1)
$ 1,847
$ 2,059 $
63
88
(124)
3
92
5
3
(4)
Balance, end of year
$ 2,185 $
7
(7)
$ 1,621
189
3
(131)
94
72
(1)
$ 1,847
235 $ 2,294
78
98
(131)
3
15
10
(7)
9
(9)
101
(9)
5
3
(4)
253 $ 2,438
$ 1,544
124 $
3
(103)
97
(45)
1
$ 1,621
$ 1,738 $
52
91
(103)
3
7
(7)
$ 1,544
131
3
(110)
97
(45)
1
$ 1,621
214 $ 1,952
65
103
(110)
3
13
12
(7)
273
6
279
3
2
$ 2,059 $
3
(3)
(1)
235 $ 2,294
(1) Relates to the elimination of certain post-retirement benefits for employees of one of the Company's other defined benefit plans.
(2) Contractual and special termination benefits include $6 related to the reduction of head office and administrative positions at
Loblaw (see note 17).
For the year ended 2012, the actual return on plan assets was $166 (2011 – $52).
During 2013, the Company expects to contribute approximately $175 (2012 – contributed approximately $176)
to its registered funded defined benefit pension plans. The actual amount paid may vary from the estimate
based on actuarial valuations being completed, investment performance, volatility in discount rates, regulatory
requirements and other factors. In 2013, the Company also expects to make contributions to its defined
contribution plans and the MEPPs in which it participates as well as make benefit payments to the beneficiaries
of the supplemental unfunded defined benefit pension plans, other defined benefit plans and other long term
employee benefit plans.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 101
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Composition of Plan Assets
The defined benefit pension plan assets are held in trust and consisted of the following asset categories:
Percentage of plan assets
Equity securities
Debt securities
Cash and cash equivalents
Total
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
58%
41%
1%
100%
Dec. 31, 2011
53%
46%
1%
100%
As at year end 2012 and 2011, the defined benefit pension plans did not directly include any GWL or Loblaw
securities.
The cost recognized in other comprehensive loss for defined benefit plans was as follows:
Actuarial losses
Change in liability arising from asset ceiling
Change in liability arising from minimum
funding requirements for past service
Total net actuarial losses recognized in other
comprehensive loss before income taxes
Income tax recoveries on actuarial
losses (note 6)
Actuarial losses net of income
tax recoveries
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
$
20 $
9 $
2012
Total
29
$
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
318 $
(1)
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
6 $
3
3
(2)
2011
Total
324
(1)
(2)
$
23 $
9 $
32
$
315 $
6 $
321
(6)
(2)
(8)
(82)
(1)
(83)
$
17 $
7 $
24
$
233 $
5 $
238
The cumulative actuarial losses before income taxes recognized in equity for the Company's defined benefit
plans were as follows:
Cumulative amount, beginning of year
Net actuarial losses recognized in the year
before income taxes
Cumulative amount, end of year
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
428 $
23
451 $
$
$
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
25 $
9
34 $
2012
Total
453
32
485
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
113 $
315
428 $
$
$
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
19 $
6
25 $
2011
Total
132
321
453
102 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Principal Actuarial Assumptions
The principal actuarial assumptions used in calculating the Company's defined benefit plan obligations and net
defined benefit plan cost for the year were as follows (expressed as weighted averages):
Defined Benefit Plan Obligations
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
Mortality table
Net Defined Benefit Plan Cost
Discount rate
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
Mortality table
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
2012
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
2011
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
4.00%
3.50%
UP94@Fully
4.00%
n/a
UP94@Fully
4.25%
3.50%
UP94@Fully
4.25%
n/a
UP94@Fully
Generational
Generational
Generational
Generational
4.25%
5.75%
3.50%
UP94@Fully
4.25%
n/a
n/a
UP94@Fully
5.25%
6.25%
3.50%
UP94@2020
5.25%
n/a
n/a
UP94@2020
Generational
Generational
n/a – not applicable
The growth rate of health care costs, primarily drug and other medical costs, for the other defined benefit plan
obligations as at year end 2012 was estimated at 5.75% and was assumed to gradually decrease to 4.50% by
2018, remaining at that level thereafter.
The overall expected long term rate of return on plan assets was 5.75%. The expected long term rate of return
on plan assets is determined based on asset mix, active management and a review of historical returns. The
expected long term rate of return is based on the portfolio as a whole and not on the sum of the individual asset
categories.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 103
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Sensitivity of Key Actuarial Assumptions
The following table outlines the key assumptions for 2012 (expressed as weighted averages) and the sensitivity
of a 1% change in each of these assumptions on the defined benefit plan obligations and the net defined benefit
plan cost.
The sensitivity analysis provided in the table is hypothetical and should be used with caution. The sensitivities of
each key assumption have been calculated independently of any changes in other key assumptions. Actual
experience may result in changes in a number of key assumptions simultaneously. Changes in one factor may
result in changes in another, which could amplify or reduce the impact of such assumptions.
Increase (Decrease)
Expected long term rate of return on plan assets
Impact of: 1% increase
1% decrease
Discount rate
Impact of: 1% increase
1% decrease
Expected growth rate of health care costs(2)
Impact of: 1% increase
1% decrease
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
Other Defined Benefit Plans
Defined
Benefit Plan
Obligations
$
$
n/a
n/a
4.00%
(313)
368
n/a
n/a
Net
Defined
Benefit
Plan Cost(1)
5.75%
(17)
17
4.25%
(6)
5
$
$
$
$
n/a
n/a
Defined
Benefit Plan
Obligations
n/a
n/a
4.00%
(32)
37
5.75%
33
(29)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Net
Defined
Benefit
Plan Cost(1)
n/a
n/a
n/a
4.25%
(2)
2
5.75%
4
(3)
n/a – not applicable
(1) Discount rate and expected growth rate of health care costs sensitivity is for current service and interest costs only.
(2) Gradually decreasing to 4.50% by 2018 for the defined benefit plan obligations, remaining at that level thereafter.
Historical Information
The history of defined benefit plans was as follows:
Fair value of plan assets
Present value of defined benefit plan obligations
Deficit in the plans
Experience adjustments arising on plan assets(1)
Experience adjustments arising on plan liabilities(1)
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
1,847
$
(2,438)
(591)
72
(101)
$
$
$
Dec. 31, 2011
1,621
$
(2,294)
(673)
(45)
(279)
$
$
$
Dec. 31, 2010
1,544
$
(1,952)
(408)
50
(187)
$
$
$
Jan. 1, 2010
1,372
$
(1,710)
(338)
n/a
n/a
$
n/a – not applicable.
(1) Experience adjustments arising on plan assets and plan liabilities were recognized in other comprehensive loss.
104 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
(ii) Post-Employment and Other Long Term Employee Benefit Costs
The net cost recognized in net earnings before income taxes for the Company's post-employment and other long
term employee benefit plans was as follows:
Current service cost
Interest cost on defined benefit plan obligations(1)
Expected return on pension plan assets(1)
Contractual and special termination benefits(2)
Past service cost(3)
Other
Net post-employment defined benefit cost
Defined contribution costs(4)
Multi-employer pension plan costs(4)
Total net post-employment benefit costs
Other long term employee benefit costs(1)
Net post-employment and other long term
employee benefit costs
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
63
88
(94)
8
(3)
62
$
$
$
$
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
15
10
(8)
17
$
$
$
$
2012
Total
78
98
(94)
8
(8)
(3)
79
22
104
205
30
235
(1)
(2)
Interest cost on defined benefit plan obligations, expected return on pension plan assets and $4 of other long term employee benefit
costs were recognized in net interest expense and other financing charges.
Includes $6 of contractual and special termination benefits related to the reduction in head office and administrative positions at
Loblaw (see note 17).
(3) Relates to the elimination of certain post-retirement benefits for employees of one of the Company's other defined benefit plans.
(4) Amounts represent the Company's contributions made in connection with defined contribution plans and MEPPs. Includes $51
related to the Company's MEPP withdrawal (see note 17).
Current service cost
Interest cost on defined benefit plan obligations(1)
Expected return on pension plan assets(1)
Contractual termination benefits
Other
Net post-employment defined benefit cost
Defined contribution costs(2)
Multi-employer pension plan costs(2)
Total net post-employment benefit costs
Other long term employee benefit costs(1)
Net post-employment and other long term
$
$
employee benefit costs
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Plans
52
91
(97)
3
$
49
$
Other
Defined
Benefit
Plans
13
12
(3)
22
$
$
$
$
2011
Total
65
103
(97)
3
(3)
71
20
53
144
26
170
(1)
Interest cost on defined benefit plan obligations, expected return on pension plan assets and $5 of other long term employee
benefit costs were recognized in net interest expense and other financing charges.
(2) Amounts represent the Company's contributions made in connection with defined contribution plans and MEPPs.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 105
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The net post-employment and other long term employee benefit costs presented in the consolidated statements
of earnings were as follows:
Operating income
Net interest expense and other financing charges (note 5)
Net post-employment and other long term employee benefit costs
2012
227
8
235
$
$
2011
159
11
170
$
$
Note 26. Share-Based Compensation ($ except where otherwise indicated)
The following table summarizes the Company’s cost recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses
related to its stock option plans, RSU plans, PSU plans and GWL's and Glenhuron's equity derivatives:
($ millions)
Stock option plans expense(1)
RSU(1) and PSU plans expense
Equity derivative contracts (income) expense
Net share-based compensation expense
2012
21
16
(8)
29
$
$
2011
14
18
15
47
$
$
(1)
In connection with the $1.0 billion special one-time common share dividend paid during the first quarter of 2011, employees who
held stock options and RSUs were compensated for the decreased value of their awards resulting from the payment of the dividend.
The related expense was included in share-based compensation expense.
The following is the carrying amount of the Company’s share-based compensation arrangements including stock
option plans, RSU plans, PSU plans, DSU plans, and EDSU plans:
($ millions)
Trade and other payables
Other liabilities
Contributed surplus
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
14
$
36
$
45
$
Dec. 31, 2011
17
$
24
$
45
$
Subsequent to year end 2012, both GWL and Loblaw's RSU and PSU plans were amended to require settlement
in shares rather than in cash. Trusts have been established to facilitate the purchase of shares for future
settlement for each of the RSU and PSU plans upon vesting. These trusts will be consolidated by the Company.
Stock Option Plans
GWL maintains a stock option plan for certain employees. Under this plan, GWL may grant options for up to
6,453,726 of its common shares, representing approximately 5% of outstanding common shares. Stock options
have up to a seven-year term, vest 20% or 33% cumulatively on each anniversary date of the grant and are
exercisable at the designated common share price, which is based on the greater of the volume weighted
average trading price of GWL's common shares for either the five trading days prior to the date of grant or the
trading day immediately preceding the grant date. Each stock option is exercisable into one common share of
GWL at the price specified in the terms of the option agreement.
Loblaw maintains a stock option plan for certain employees. Under this plan, Loblaw may grant options for up to
28,137,162 of its common shares, representing approximately 10% of outstanding common shares. Stock
options have up to a seven-year term, vest 20% or 33% cumulatively on each anniversary date of the grant and
are exercisable at the designated common share price, which is based on the greater of the volume weighted
average trading price of Loblaw's common shares for either the five trading days prior to the date of grant or the
106 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
trading day immediately preceding the grant date. Each stock option is exercisable into one common share of
Loblaw at the price specified in the terms of the option agreement.
Commencing February 22, 2011, GWL and Loblaw amended their stock option plans whereby the right to receive
a cash payment in lieu of exercising an option for shares was removed. As a result, $51 million previously
recorded in trade and other payables and other liabilities was reclassified to contributed surplus.
The following is a summary of GWL's stock option plan activity:
Options
2012
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Outstanding options, beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited/cancelled
Expired
Outstanding options, end of year(1)
Options exercisable, end of year
(number
of shares)
1,414,504
381,146
(41,361)
(49,328)
(268,727)
1,436,234
616,453
Price/Share
75.43
62.96
57.83
67.65
109.32
66.55
67.96
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Options
(number
of shares)
1,533,443
250,628
(17,560)
(352,007)
1,414,504
684,118
$
$
$
$
$
$
2011
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price/Share
75.71
68.37
51.00
72.83
75.43
84.08
(1) Options outstanding of 1,436,234 (2011 – 1,414,504) represented approximately 1.1% (2011 – 1.1%) of GWL's issued and
outstanding common shares, which was within GWL's guideline of approximately 5%.
The following table summarizes information about GWL's outstanding stock options:
Outstanding Options
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
5
5
2
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price/Share
58.88
67.98
74.73
$
$
$
2012
Exercisable Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price/Share
52.42
69.00
73.44
$
$
$
Number of
Exercisable
Options
139,905
98,655
377,893
616,453
Number of
Options
Outstanding
562,492
418,585
455,157
1,436,234
Range of Exercise Prices ($)
$46.24 – $63.01
$63.02 – $71.60
$71.61 – $81.05
During 2012, GWL granted stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $62.96 (2011 – $68.37) per
common share and a fair value of $5 million (2011 – $3 million). In addition, during 2012, GWL issued 41,361
(2011 – 17,560) common shares on the exercise of stock options with a weighted average share price of $69.39
(2011 – $67.60) per common share and received cash consideration of $2 million (2011 – $1 million).
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 107
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The assumptions used to measure the grant date fair value of the GWL options granted during 2012 and 2011
under the Black-Scholes stock option valuation model were as follows:
Expected dividend yield(1)
Expected share price volatility(2)
Risk-free interest rate(3)
Expected life of options(4)
2012
2.3% - 2.4%
24.2% - 25.8%
1.5% - 1.8%
4.8 - 6.6 years
2011
2.0% - 2.2%
24.3% - 26.0%
1.4% - 2.8%
4.8 - 6.6 years
(1) The expected dividend yield is estimated based on the annual dividend prior to the stock option grant date and the closing share
price as at the stock option grant date.
(2) The expected share price volatility is estimated based on GWL's historical volatility over a period consistent with the expected life of
the options.
(3) The risk-free interest rate is estimated based on the Government of Canada bond yield in effect at the grant date for a term to
maturity equal to the expected life of the options.
(4) The effect of expected exercise of options prior to expiry is incorporated into the weighted average expected life of the options,
which is based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour.
Estimated forfeiture rates are incorporated into the measurement of stock option plan expense. The forfeiture
rate applied as at year end 2012 was 4.2% (2011 – 4.6%).
The following is a summary of Loblaw’s stock option plan activity:
Options
2012
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Outstanding options, beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited/cancelled
Expired
Outstanding options, end of year(1)
Options exercisable, end of year
(number
of shares)
10,750,993
4,605,970
(718,544)
(1,506,608)
(592,883)
12,538,928
4,120,017
Price/Share
38.90
34.91
31.00
36.74
68.64
36.74
38.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Options
(number
of shares)
9,320,865
3,337,049
(686,794)
(1,220,127)
10,750,993
3,671,069
$
$
$
$
$
$
2011
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price/Share
38.56
39.20
30.61
41.80
38.90
43.25
(1) Options outstanding of 12,538,928 (2011 – 10,750,993) represented approximately 4.5% (2011 – 3.8%) of Loblaw's issued and
outstanding common shares, which was within Loblaw's guideline of approximately 10% (2011 – 5%).
108 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
The following table summarizes information about Loblaw's outstanding stock options:
Outstanding Options
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
3
6
4
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price/Share
30.23
35.36
42.21
$
$
$
2012
Exercisable Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price/Share
29.95
36.35
45.48
$
$
$
Number of
Exercisable
Options
1,419,209
635,412
2,065,396
4,120,017
Number of
Options
Outstanding
2,383,145
5,838,021
4,317,762
12,538,928
Range of Exercise Prices ($)
$28.95 – $34.62
$34.63 – $36.85
$36.86 – $54.71
During 2012, Loblaw granted stock options with a weighted average exercise price of $34.91 (2011 – $39.20)
per common share and a fair value of $27 million (2011 – $26 million). In addition, during 2012, Loblaw issued
718,544 common shares (2011 – 686,794) on the exercise of stock options with a weighted average share
price of $36.90 (2011 – $39.86) per common share and received cash consideration of $22 million
(2011 – $21 million).
The assumptions used to measure the grant date fair value of the Loblaw options granted during 2012 and 2011
under the Black-Scholes stock option valuation model were as follows:
Expected dividend yield(1)
Expected share price volatility(2)
Risk-free interest rate(3)
Expected life of options(4)
2012
2.4% - 2.7%
21.1% - 24.8%
1.3% - 1.6%
4.2 - 6.5 years
2011
2.1% - 2.3%
22.1% - 24.7%
1.2% - 2.9%
4.4 - 6.4 years
(1) The expected dividend yield is estimated based on the annual dividend prior to the stock option grant date and the closing share
price as at the stock option grant date.
(2) The expected share price volatility is estimated based on Loblaw's historical volatility over a period consistent with the expected life
of the options.
(3) The risk-free interest rate is estimated based on the Government of Canada bond yield in effect at the grant date for a term to
maturity equal to the expected life of the options.
(4) The effect of expected exercise of options prior to expiry is incorporated into the weighted average expected life of the options,
which is based on historical experience and general option holder behaviour.
Estimated forfeiture rates are incorporated into the measurement of stock option plan expense. The forfeiture
rate applied as at year end 2012 was 15.0% (2011 – 16.3%).
Restricted Share Unit Plans
GWL and Loblaw both maintain a RSU plan for certain employees. RSU grants entitle employees to a cash
payment after the end of each performance period, ranging from three to five years, following the date of the
award. The RSU payment will be an amount equal to the weighted average price of a GWL or Loblaw common
share on the TSX in the five trading days preceding the end of the performance period for the RSUs multiplied by
the number of RSUs held by the employee.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 109
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The following is a summary of GWL's and Loblaw's RSU plan activity:
(Number of Awards)
Outstanding RSUs, beginning of year
Granted
Settled
Forfeited
Outstanding RSUs, end of year
RSUs settled ($ millions)
GWL
Loblaw
2012
139,813
82,249
(66,546)
(7,590)
147,926
4
$
2011
163,370
85,573
(93,356)
(15,774)
139,813
6
2012
1,119,496
379,746
(382,871)
(78,100)
1,038,271
13
$
2011
1,045,346
548,003
(398,532)
(75,321)
1,119,496
15
$
$
As at year end 2012, the intrinsic value of GWL's and Loblaw's vested RSUs was $5 million (2011 – $6 million) and
$22 million (2011 – $22 million), respectively.
Performance Share Unit Plans
During 2012, the GWL and Loblaw Boards approved a PSU plan for certain employees. PSU grants entitle
employees to a cash payment equal to the weighted average price of a GWL or Loblaw common share on the TSX
in the five trading days preceding the end of a three year performance period multiplied by the number of units
that are vested. The number of units that vest is based on the achievement of specified performance measures.
The following is a summary of GWL's and Loblaw's PSU plan activity:
(Number of Awards)
Outstanding PSUs, beginning of year
Granted
Forfeited
Outstanding PSUs, end of year
GWL
2012
43,012
(1,911)
41,101
Loblaw
2012
50,818
50,818
As at year end 2012, the intrinsic value of GWL's and Loblaw's vested PSUs was $1 million and a nominal
amount, respectively.
Director Deferred Share Unit Plans
The following is a summary of GWL's and Loblaw's DSU plan activity:
(Number of Awards)
Outstanding DSUs, beginning of year
Granted
Reinvested
Settled
Outstanding DSUs, end of year
GWL
Loblaw
2012
143,754
25,507
3,569
2011
105,015
24,569
14,170
2012
158,017
36,570
4,193
172,830
143,754
198,780
2011
147,358
36,438
3,209
(28,988)
158,017
In 2012, the Company recorded a compensation cost of $2 million (2011 – $5 million) related to these plans in
selling, general and administrative expenses. As at year end 2012, the intrinsic value of GWL's and Loblaw's DSUs
was $12 million (2011 – $10 million) and $8 million (2011 – $6 million), respectively.
110 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Executive Deferred Share Unit Plans
The following is a summary of GWL's and Loblaw's EDSU plan activity:
(Number of Awards)
Outstanding EDSUs, beginning of year
Granted
Reinvested
Settled
Outstanding EDSUs, end of year
GWL
Loblaw
2012
4,130
711
84
(1,327)
3,598
2011
2,129
1,691
310
4,130
2012
43,928
3,553
1,007
(21,781)
26,707
2011
29,143
14,733
877
(825)
43,928
In 2012, the Company recorded a nominal compensation cost (2011 – $1 million) related to these plans in selling,
general and administrative expenses. As at year end 2012, the intrinsic value of GWL's and Loblaw's EDSUs was a
nominal amount (2011 – nominal) and $1 million (2011 – $2 million), respectively.
Equity Derivative Contracts
The following is a summary of GWL's equity swap contracts (see note 29):
($ millions unless otherwise indicated)
Outstanding contracts (in millions)
Forward price per share ($)
Unrealized loss recorded in trade and other payables
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
0.8
107.26
29
$
$
Dec. 31, 2011
0.8
107.26
31
$
$
Subsequent to the end of 2012, GWL paid $29 million to settle its remaining equity swap contract representing
800,000 GWL common shares, which GWL purchased under its NCIB for $57 million. Of the 800,000 common
shares purchased, 580,000 common shares were cancelled and the remaining 220,000 common shares were
placed into trusts for future settlement of GWL's RSUs and PSUs.
The following is a summary of Glenhuron’s equity forward contracts (see note 29):
($ millions unless otherwise indicated)
Outstanding contracts (in millions)
Average forward price per share ($)
Interest expense (income) per share ($)
Unrealized loss recorded in trade and other payables
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
1.1
56.59
0.16
16
$
$
$
Dec. 31, 2011
1.1
56.38
(0.05)
20
$
$
$
Subsequent to the end of 2012, Glenhuron paid $16 million to settle its remaining equity forward contract
representing 1,103,500 Loblaw common shares, which Loblaw purchased under its NCIB for $46 million, and
placed into trusts for future settlement of Loblaw's RSUs and PSUs.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 111
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 27. Employee Costs
Included in operating income were the following employee costs:
Wages, salaries and other short term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits (note 25)
Other long term employee benefits (note 25)
Share-based compensation (note 26)
Capitalized to fixed assets
Employee costs
Note 28. Leases
2012
3,366
201
26
37
(24)
3,606
$
$
2011
3,264
138
21
32
(21)
3,434
$
$
The Company leases certain of its retail stores, distribution centres, corporate offices, and other assets under
operating or finance lease arrangements. Substantially all of the retail store leases have renewal options for
additional terms. The contingent rents under certain of the retail store leases are based on a percentage of retail
sales. The Company also has properties which are sub-leased to third parties.
Determining whether a lease arrangement is classified as finance or operating requires judgment with respect to
the fair value of the leased asset, the economic life of the lease, the discount rate and the allocation of leasehold
interests between the land and building elements of property leases.
Operating Leases – As Lessee
Future minimum lease payments relating to the Company's operating leases are as follows:
Operating lease payments
Sub-lease income
Net operating lease
payments
$
$
Payments due by year
As at
2013
212 $
(49)
2014
195 $
(42)
2015
171 $
(29)
2016
140 $
(19)
2017
115 $
(11)
Thereafter
455
(37)
Dec. 31, 2012
1,288
$
(187)
Dec. 31, 2011
1,242
$
(226)
163 $
153 $
142 $
121 $
104 $
418
$
1,101
$
1,016
In 2012, the Company recorded $208 (2011 – $198) as an expense in the statement of earnings in respect of
operating leases. Contingent rent recognized as an expense in respect of operating leases was $1 (2011 – $1),
while sub-lease income earned was $51 (2011 – $49) which was recognized in operating income.
Operating Leases – As Lessor
As at year end 2012, Loblaw leased certain owned land and buildings with a cost of $2,037 (2011 – $1,681) and
related accumulated depreciation of $539 (2011 – $408). For the year ended 2012, rental income was $132
(2011 – $127) and contingent rent was $2 (2011 – $1), both of which were recognized in operating income.
Future rental income relating to Loblaw's operating leases is as follows:
Payments to be received by year
As at
2016
2017
86 $
58 $
Thereafter
158
Dec. 31, 2012
696
$
Dec. 31, 2011
634
$
Net operating lease income $
2013
153 $
2014
131 $
2015
110 $
112 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Finance Leases – As Lessee
Loblaw has finance leases for certain property, plant and equipment.
Future minimum lease payments relating to Loblaw's finance leases are as follows:
Payments due by year
As at
Finance lease payments
Less future finance charges
Present value of minimum
lease payments
$
$
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
62 $
(28)
43 $
(25)
42 $
(23)
41 $
(22)
Thereafter
529
38 $
Dec. 31, 2012
755
$
Dec. 31, 2011
708
$
(21)
(270)
(389)
(374)
34 $
18 $
19 $
19 $
17 $
259
$
366
$
334
In 2012, contingent rent recognized by Loblaw as an expense in respect of finance leases was $1 (2011 – $1).
Future sub-lease income relating to Loblaw's sub-lease agreements is as follows:
Payments to be received by year
As at
Sub-lease income
2013
(14) $
2014
(13) $
$
2015
2016
2017
Thereafter
Dec. 31, 2012
(9) $
(6) $
(4) $
(11) $
(57) $
Dec. 31, 2011
(52)
As at year end 2012, the sub-lease payments receivable under finance leases was $16 (2011 – $14).
Note 29. Financial Instruments
The Company's financial assets and financial liabilities are classified as follows:
•
cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits are designated as fair value through
profit or loss;
• derivatives which are not designated in a hedge are classified as fair value through profit or loss;
• accounts receivable, credit card receivables and Loblaw franchise loans receivable and certain other assets
are classified as loans and receivables and carried at amortized cost; and
• bank indebtedness, trade and other payables, short term debt, long term debt, finance lease obligations,
certain other liabilities and capital securities are classified as other financial liabilities and carried at
amortized cost.
The Company has not classified any financial assets as held-to-maturity.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short Term Investments and Security Deposits
As at year end 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits
of $4,075 (2011 – $4,101), including U.S. $2,239 (2011 – U.S. $2,212) that was held primarily by Dunedin
Holdings GmbH (“Dunedin”), a subsidiary of GWL, and certain of its affiliates and Glenhuron.
In 2012, a loss of $13 (2011 – gain of $12) was recognized in other comprehensive loss related to the effect of
foreign currency translation on the Company's (excluding Loblaw's) U.S. net investment in foreign operations. In
addition, a loss of $24 (2011 – gain of $25) was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses related
to the effect of foreign currency translation on a portion of the U.S. dollar denominated cash and cash
equivalents and short term investments held by foreign operations that have the same functional currency as
that of the Company.
In addition, a loss of $27 (2011 – gain of $25) was recognized in Loblaw's operating income as a result of
translating U.S. dollar denominated cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits of
U.S. $1,113 (2011 – U.S. $1,073) held primarily by Glenhuron. Cross currency swaps provide an offset to the
effect of this foreign currency translation. See cross currency swaps section below.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 113
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Cross Currency Swaps
As at year end 2012, Glenhuron held outstanding cross currency swaps (see note 30) to exchange U.S. dollars for
$1,199 (2011 – $1,252) Canadian dollars. The swaps mature by 2019 and are financial derivatives classified as
fair value through profit or loss. Currency adjustments receivable or payable arising from these swaps are settled
in cash on maturity. As at year end 2012, a cumulative unrealized foreign currency exchange rate receivable of
$93 (2011 – $89) was recorded in other assets (see note 16), and a receivable of $20 (2011 – $48) was recorded
in prepaid expenses and other assets. In 2012, a fair value gain of $25 (2011 – loss of $29) was recognized in
operating income relating to these cross currency swaps.
In 2008, Loblaw entered into fixed cross currency swaps to exchange $148 Canadian dollars for U.S. $150, which
mature in the second quarter of 2013 and entered into additional fixed cross currency swaps to exchange
$148 Canadian dollars for U.S. $150, which mature in 2015. A portion of these cross currency swaps was
originally designated in a cash flow hedge to manage the foreign exchange variability related to part of Loblaw's
fixed-rate U.S. dollar private placement notes. In 2011, the designated swap was no longer classified as a cash
flow hedge and as a result, the fair value changes were recorded in operating income. As at year end 2012, a
cumulative unrealized foreign currency exchange rate receivable of $5 (2011 – $14) was recorded in other assets
(see note 16) and a receivable of $2 (2011 – nil) was recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets. In 2012,
Loblaw recognized an unrealized fair value loss of $7 (2011 – gain of $2) in operating income related to these
cross currency swaps. Offsetting the unrealized fair value loss was an unrealized foreign currency translation gain
of $6 (2011 – loss of $6) which was also recognized in operating income related to the translation of the U.S.
$300 fixed rate private placement notes.
Interest Rate Swaps
Loblaw maintains a notional $150 (2011 – $150) in interest rate swaps that mature by the third quarter of 2013,
on which it pays a fixed rate of 8.38%. As at year end 2012, the fair value of these interest rate swaps of $5
(2011 – $16) was recorded in other liabilities. In 2012, Loblaw recognized a fair value gain of $11 (2011 – $8) in
operating income related to these swaps.
Interest rate swaps previously held by Glenhuron converted a notional $200 of floating rate cash and cash
equivalents, short term investments and security deposits to average fixed rate investments at 4.74%. These
interest rate swaps matured in 2011. During 2011, Glenhuron recognized a fair value loss of $7 on these interest
rate swaps in operating income.
Equity Derivative Contracts ($, except where otherwise indicated)
As at year end 2012, GWL had an equity swap contract to buy 0.8 million (2011 – 0.8 million) GWL common
shares at a forward price of $107.26 (2011 – $107.26) per share. As at year end 2012, the unrealized market loss
of $29 million (2011 – $31 million) was recorded in trade and other payables. In 2012, GWL recorded a fair value
gain of $2 million (2011 – loss of $15 million) in operating income in relation to this equity swap contract.
During 2011, GWL amended its swap agreements to adjust the forward price of its equity swaps by $7.75 from
an average forward price of $103.17 to an average forward price of $95.42 as a result of the special one-time
common share dividend of $7.75 per common share paid in January 2011. Also during 2011, GWL paid
$75 million to terminate one equity swap contract and purchase for cancellation the underlying 886,700 GWL
common shares under its NCIB program (see note 22).
Subsequent to the end of 2012, GWL paid $29 million to settle its remaining equity swap contract representing
800,000 GWL common shares, which GWL purchased under its NCIB for $57 million. Of the 800,000 common
shares purchased, 580,000 common shares were cancelled and the remaining 220,000 common shares were
placed into trusts for future settlement of GWL's RSUs and PSUs (see note 26).
As at year end 2012, Glenhuron had an equity forward contract to buy 1.1 million (2011 – 1.1 million) Loblaw
common shares at an average forward price of $56.59 (2011 – $56.38) including $0.16 of interest expense
(2011 – $0.05 interest income) per common share. As at year end 2012, the cumulative accrued interest and
unrealized market loss of $16 million (2011 – $20 million) was included in trade and other payables. In 2012,
114 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Glenhuron recognized a fair value gain of $5 million (2011 – loss of $2 million) in operating income in relation to
this equity forward contract.
During 2011, Glenhuron paid $7 million to terminate equity forwards representing 390,100 Loblaw common
shares, which Loblaw purchased for cancellation under its NCIB for $15 million (see note 23). Subsequent to the
end of 2012, Glenhuron paid $16 million to settle its remaining equity forward contract representing 1,103,500
Loblaw common shares, which Loblaw purchased under its NCIB for $46 million, and placed into trusts for future
settlement of Loblaw's RSUs and PSUs (see note 26).
In 2001, Weston Holdings Limited (“WHL”), a subsidiary of GWL, entered into an equity forward sale agreement
based on 9.6 million Loblaw common shares at an original forward price of $48.50 per Loblaw common share. As
at year end 2012, the forward price had increased to $92.26 (2011 – $88.14) per Loblaw common share under
the terms of the agreement and the fair value of this forward sale agreement of $483 million (2011 –
$478 million) was recorded in other assets (see note 16). In 2012, a fair value loss of $35 million (2011 – gain of
$18 million) was recorded in net interest expense and other financing charges related to this agreement
(see note 5).
Weston Foods Commodity Derivatives
Weston Foods uses commodity futures, options and forward contracts to manage its anticipated exposure to
fluctuations in commodity prices.
As at year end 2012, the unrealized loss related to Weston Foods' commodity futures of $2 (2011 – $1) was
recorded in accounts receivable. As at year end 2012, a nominal cumulative fair value loss (2011 – nominal gain)
related to Weston Foods' commodity options was recorded in accounts receivable.
Franchise Loans Receivable and Franchise Investments in Other Assets
The value of Loblaw franchise loans receivable of $363 (2011 – $331) was recorded on the consolidated balance
sheet. In 2012, Loblaw recorded an impairment loss of $12 (2011 – $11) in operating income related to these
loan receivables.
The value of Loblaw franchise investments of $64 (2011 – $53) was recorded in other assets. In 2012, Loblaw
recorded an impairment loss of $7 (2011 – $4) in operating income related to these investments.
Other Loblaw Derivatives
Loblaw also maintains other financial derivatives including foreign exchange forwards, electricity forwards and
fuel exchange traded futures and options. As at year end 2012, a nominal (2011 – $1) cumulative unrealized
receivable was recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets.
Fair Value Measurement
The Company classifies financial assets and financial liabilities under the following fair value hierarchy. The
different levels have been identified as follows:
•
•
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and
Level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).
•
The following describes the fair value determinations of financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short Term Investments and Security Deposits Fair value is primarily based on
interest rates for similar instruments. Due to the short term maturity of these instruments, the carrying amount
approximates fair value.
Accounts Receivable, Credit Card Receivables, Bank Indebtedness, Trade and Other Payables and Short
Term Debt Fair value is based on estimated cash flows, discounted at interest rates for similar instruments. Due
to the short term maturity of these instruments, the carrying amount approximates fair value.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 115
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Franchise Loan Receivables Fair value is based on estimated cash flows, discounted at interest rates for similar
instruments. The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the minimal fluctuations in the forward
interest rate and the sufficiency of provisions recorded for all impaired receivables.
Derivative Financial Instruments The fair values of derivative assets and liabilities are estimated using industry
standard valuation models. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future
amounts to a present value using market based observable inputs including interest rate curves, credit spreads,
foreign exchange rates and forward and spot prices for currencies.
Long Term Debt, Capital Securities and Other Financial Instruments Fair value is based on the present value of
contractual cash flows, discounted at the Company's current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of
borrowing arrangements or, where applicable, quoted market prices.
The following tables provide a summary of carrying and fair values for each classification of financial instruments
and an analysis of financial instruments carried at fair value by fair value hierarchy level:
As at Dec. 31, 2012
Financial
instruments
required
to be
classified
as fair value
through
profit or
loss
Financial
instruments
designated
as fair value
through
profit or
loss
$
1,589
2,138
Loans
and
receivables
Other
financial
liabilities
Total
carrying
amount
Total
fair
value
$
1,589
$
1,589
2,138
2,138
Cash and cash equivalents
Short term investments
Derivatives included in accounts receivable
$
(2)
Other accounts receivable
Credit card receivables
Security deposits
Franchise loans receivable
Derivatives included in other assets
603
Certain other assets
Total financial assets
Fair value level 1
Fair value level 2
Fair value level 3
Total fair value
Short term debt
Derivatives included in trade and other payables
Other trade and other payables
Long term debt
Derivatives included in other liabilities
Certain other liabilities
Capital securities
Total financial liabilities
Fair value level 1
Fair value level 2
Fair value level 3
Total fair value
116 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
46
5
51
50
1
51
$
561
2,305
348
363
75
(2)
561
2,305
348
363
603
75
601 $
4,075 $
3,304
$
7,980
(2) $
603
385
3,690
601 $
4,075
(2)
561
2,305
348
363
603
75
7,980
383
4,293
4,676
1,319
46
3,891
7,901
5
44
243
$
$
$
$
$
1,319 $
1,319
3,891
6,933
44
223
46
3,891
6,933
5
44
223
$
12,410 $
12,461
$ 13,449
$
$
50
1
51
As at Dec. 31, 2011
Loans
and
receivables
Other
financial
liabilities
Total
carrying
amount
Total
fair
value
Financial
instruments
required
to be
classified
as fair value
through
profit or
loss
Financial
instruments
designated
as fair value
through
profit or
loss
$
1,372
2,362
Cash and cash equivalents
Short term investments
Derivatives included in accounts receivable
$
(1)
Other accounts receivable
Credit card receivables
Security deposits
Franchise loans receivable
Derivatives included in other assets
Certain other assets
Total financial assets
Fair value level 1
Fair value level 2
Fair value level 3
Total fair value
Bank indebtedness
Short term debt
Derivatives included in trade and other payables
Other trade and other payables
Long term debt
Derivatives included in other liabilities
Certain other liabilities
Capital securities
Total financial liabilities
Fair value level 1
Fair value level 2
Fair value level 3
Total fair value
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
630
629 $
(1) $
630
53
19
72
70
2
72
$
560
2,101
367
331
64
4,101 $
3,056
$
7,786
384
3,717
629 $
4,101
$
3 $
$
1,372
$
1,372
2,362
2,362
(1)
560
(1)
560
2,101
2,101
367
331
630
64
3
1,280
53
3,887
6,844
19
49
222
$
$
$
$
367
331
630
64
7,786
383
4,347
4,730
3
1,280
53
3,887
7,595
19
49
248
1,280
3,887
6,844
49
222
$
12,285 $
12,357
$ 13,134
$
$
70
2
72
The fair value of the embedded foreign currency derivative classified as level 3 and included in other liabilities
was $1 (2011 – $2), of which the fair value gain of $1 (2011 – loss of $5) was recognized in operating income. A
1% increase (decrease) in foreign currency exchange rates would result in an additional gain (loss) of $1 in fair
value.
In 2012, the net loss on financial instruments designated as fair value through profit or loss recognized in net
earnings before income taxes was $27 (2011 – $25). In addition, the net gain on financial instruments required to
be classified as fair value through profit or loss recognized in net earnings before income taxes was
$13 (2011 – net loss of $30).
During 2012, net interest expense of $414 (2011 – $418) was recorded related to financial instruments not
classified or designated as fair value through profit and loss.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 117
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 30. Financial Risk Management
As a result of holding and issuing financial instruments, the Company is exposed to credit risk, market risk and
liquidity and capital availability risk. The following is a description of those risks and how the exposures are
managed:
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit risk resulting from the possibility that counterparties could default on their
financial obligations to the Company. Exposure to credit risk relates to derivative instruments, cash and cash
equivalents, short term investments, security deposits, PC Bank's credit card receivables, Loblaw's franchise
loans receivable, accounts receivable from Loblaw's franchisees, other receivables from Weston Foods'
customers and suppliers and Loblaw's vendors, associated stores and independent accounts, and pension assets
held in the Company's defined benefit plans.
The risk related to derivative instruments, cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security
deposits is reduced by policies and guidelines that require that the Company enters into transactions only with
counterparties or issuers that have a minimum long term “A-” credit rating from a recognized credit rating
agency and place minimum and maximum limits for exposures to specific counterparties and instruments.
PC Bank manages its credit card receivable risk by employing stringent credit scoring techniques, actively
monitoring the credit card portfolio, and reviewing techniques and technology that can improve the
effectiveness of the collection process. In addition, these receivables are dispersed among a large, diversified
group of credit card customers. Loblaw's franchise loans receivable, accounts receivable from Loblaw's
franchisees, other receivables from Weston Foods' customers and suppliers and Loblaw's vendors, associated
stores and independent accounts are actively monitored on an ongoing basis and settled on a frequent basis in
accordance with the terms specified in the applicable agreements.
The Company's maximum exposure to credit risk as it relates to derivative instruments is approximated by the
positive fair market value of the derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets (see note 29).
Refer to notes 9 and 10 for additional information on the credit quality performance of credit card receivables
and other receivables from Weston Foods' customers and suppliers and Loblaw's vendors, independent
franchisees, associated stores and independent accounts.
Market Risk
Market risk is the loss that may arise from changes in factors such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange
rates, commodity prices, common share price and the impact these factors may have on other counterparties.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk The Company's consolidated financial statements are expressed in
Canadian dollars, however a portion of the Company's (excluding Loblaw's) net assets are denominated in U.S.
dollars through both its net investment in foreign operations in the U.S. and its foreign subsidiaries held by
Dunedin and certain of its affiliates with a functional currency that is the same as that of the Company. The U.S.
dollar denominated net assets are translated into Canadian dollars at the foreign currency exchange rate in effect
at the balance sheet date. As a result, the Company is exposed to foreign currency translation gains and losses.
Those gains and losses arising from the translation of the U.S. dollar denominated assets of foreign subsidiaries
with a functional currency that is the same as that of the Company are included in operating income, while
translation gains and losses on the net investment in foreign operations in the U.S. are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss.
The Company estimates that based on the U.S. net assets held by foreign operations at the end of 2012,
an appreciation in the Canadian dollar of one cent relative to the U.S. dollar would result in a loss of
$10 (2011 – $10) in earnings before income taxes.
Revenues and expenses of all foreign operations are translated into Canadian dollars at the foreign currency
exchange rates that approximate the rates in effect at the dates when such items are recognized. An appreciating
Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will negatively impact year-over-year changes in reported sales,
118 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
operating income and net earnings, while a depreciating Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar will have the
opposite impact.
Loblaw is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate variability, primarily on its U.S. dollar denominated cash and
cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits held by Glenhuron, foreign denominated and
foreign currency based purchases in trade and other liabilities, and U.S. dollar private placement notes included
in long term debt. Loblaw and Glenhuron have cross currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts that
partially offset their respective exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates (see note 29).
Commodity Price Risk Weston Foods costs are directly impacted by fluctuations in the prices of commodity-
linked raw materials such as wheat flours, sugars, vegetable oils, cocoa powders and chocolate. Loblaw is also
exposed to fluctuations in the commodity prices as a result of the indirect link between commodities and the
cost of consumer products. In addition, both Weston Foods and Loblaw are exposed to increases in the prices of
energy in operating, in the case of Weston Foods, its bakeries and distribution networks, and, in the case of
Loblaw, its stores and distribution networks. Both Weston Foods and Loblaw use purchase commitments and
derivative instruments in the form of futures contracts, option contracts and forward contracts to manage their
current and anticipated exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices. The Company estimates that based on the
outstanding derivative contracts held by the Company at the end of 2012, a 10% decrease in relevant commodity
prices, with all other variables held constant, would result in a net loss of $7 in earnings before income taxes.
This amount excludes the offsetting impact of the commodity price risk inherent in the transactions being
hedged.
Interest Rate Risk The Company is exposed to interest rate risk from fluctuations in interest rates on its floating
rate debt and financial instruments, net of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security
deposits. GWL and Loblaw manage interest rate risk by monitoring their respective mix of fixed and floating rate
debt, net of cash and cash equivalents, short term investments and security deposits, and by taking action as
necessary to maintain an appropriate balance considering current market conditions. The Company estimates
that a 100 basis point increase in short term interest rates, with all other variables held constant, would result in
a decrease of $29 in net interest expense and other financing charges.
Common Share Price Risk GWL and Loblaw are exposed to common share market price risk as a result of the
issuance of stock options to certain employees to the extent that the equivalent shares are repurchased by GWL
and Loblaw on exercise, RSUs and PSUs. RSUs and PSUs negatively impact operating income when the common
share prices increase and positively impact operating income when the common share prices decline. GWL and
Glenhuron are parties to equity derivative contracts, which allow for settlement in cash, common shares or net
settlement. These derivatives change in value as the market prices of the GWL and Loblaw common shares
change and provide a partial offset to fluctuations in RSU and PSU plan expense or income. The impact on the
equity derivatives of a one dollar decrease in the market value in the underlying common shares, with all other
variables held constant, would result in a loss of $2 in earnings before income taxes.
In addition, the obligation of WHL under the equity forward sale agreement based on 9.6 million Loblaw
common shares, which matures in 2031, is secured by the underlying Loblaw common shares. If the market
value of the underlying Loblaw common shares exceeds the obligation of WHL under this forward, a portion of
the proceeds from a future sale of these shares may be used to satisfy the obligation under this forward contract
upon termination or maturity. At maturity, if the forward price is greater (less) than the market price of the
Loblaw common shares, WHL will receive (pay) cash equal to the difference between the notional value and the
market value of the forward contract. A one dollar decrease in the market value of the underlying shares of the
equity forward, with all other variables held constant, would result in a loss of $10 in net interest expense and
other financing charges.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 119
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Liquidity and Capital Availability Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company cannot meet a demand for cash or fund its obligations as they come
due. Liquidity risk also includes the risk of not being able to liquidate assets in a timely manner at a reasonable
price. Difficulty accessing capital markets could impair the Company's capacity to grow, execute its business
model or generate financial returns.
Liquidity and capital availability risks are mitigated by maintaining appropriate levels of cash and cash
equivalents and short term investments, actively monitoring market conditions, by diversifying the Company's
sources of funding, including its committed credit facility and maintaining a well diversified maturity profile of
debt and capital obligations.
Despite these mitigation strategies, if GWL, Loblaw or PC Bank's financial performance and condition deteriorate
or downgrades in GWL's or Loblaw's current credit ratings occur, the ability to obtain funding from external
sources could be restricted. In addition, credit and capital markets are subject to inherent risks that could
negatively affect GWL's or Loblaw's access and ability to fund their financial or other liabilities.
Maturity Analysis The following are the undiscounted contractual maturities of significant financial liabilities as
at December 31, 2012:
$
Interest rate swaps payable(1)
Equity swap and
forward contracts(2)
Long term debt including fixed
interest payments(3)
Foreign exchange forward contracts
Short term debt(4)
Other liabilities(5)
2013
6
148
2014
2015
2016
2017 Thereafter(6)
Total
$
6
148
1,014 $
1,472 $
808 $
1,021 $
301 $
6,899
11,515
78
1,319
35
4
78
1,319
39
$
2,565 $
1,507 $
808 $
1,025 $
301 $
6,899 $
13,105
(1) Based on the payment of fixed interest which will be partially offset by the floating interest received.
(2) Based on the average cost base as at December 31, 2012.
(3) Based on the maturing face values and annual interest for each instrument, including GICs, long term independent securitization
trusts and an independent funding trust, as well as annual payment obligations for SPEs, mortgages and finance lease obligations.
(4) See note 18 for a breakdown of the components of short term debt.
(5) Contractual amount of Loblaw's obligation related to certain other liabilities.
(6) Loblaw capital securities and their related dividends have been excluded as Loblaw is not contractually obligated to pay these
amounts. The Company also excluded bank indebtedness, trade payables and other liabilities, which are due within the next
12 months.
Note 31. Contingencies
The Company is involved in, and potentially subject to, various claims and matters arising out of the normal
course and conduct of its business including, but not limited to, product liability, labour and employment,
regulatory and environmental claims. Although such matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management
currently considers the Company's exposure to such claims and litigation, to the extent not covered by the
Company's insurance policies or otherwise provided for, not to be material to the consolidated financial
statements, except for Income and Other Taxes as disclosed below.
Legal Proceedings
In 2007, pursuant to a transaction whereby Domtar was combined with the fine paper business of
Weyerhaeuser Inc., Domtar common shares were exchanged for an equal number of either exchangeable shares
of Domtar (Canada) Paper Inc. or common shares of New Domtar. The Company elected to receive exchangeable
shares of Domtar (Canada) Paper Inc. in exchange for its Domtar common shares. The Share Purchase
Agreement governing the June 1998 sale by GWL of E.B. Eddy Paper, Inc. to Domtar (the “SPA”) contains a price
adjustment clause. The SPA provides, subject to certain limited exceptions, that if any person subsequently
120 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
acquired more than 50% of the outstanding voting shares of Domtar, the price adjustment clause applies. GWL
believes that a price adjustment in the amount of $110 is payable to it by Domtar and it has demanded payment
of such amount from Domtar. Domtar's position is that the purchase price adjustment does not apply because of
the application of an exception contained in the SPA. GWL has commenced an action against Domtar for $110.
The parties have exchanged legal pleadings.
The Company is the subject of various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business.
The outcome of all of these proceedings and claims is uncertain. However, based on information currently
available, these proceedings and claims, individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to have a material
impact on the Company.
Income and Other Taxes
The Company is involved in and potentially subject to tax audits from various governments and regulatory
agencies relating to income, capital and commodity taxes on an ongoing basis. As a result, from time to time,
taxing authorities may disagree with the positions and conclusions taken by the Company in its tax filings or
legislation may be amended, which could lead to assessments and reassessments. These assessments and
reassessments may have a material impact on the Company's financial statements in future periods. During
2012, Loblaw received indication from the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) that it intends to proceed with a
reassessment with regard to the tax treatment of Loblaw's wholly owned subsidiary, Glenhuron. At this early
stage, it is not possible to quantify the amount of the proposed reassessment. Although Loblaw does not expect
the ultimate outcome to be material, such matters cannot be predicted with certainty and could result in a
material charge in future periods.
During 2010, GWL received a reassessment from the CRA challenging GWL's characterization of a gain reported
in a previous year's tax return filing. Should the CRA be successful in its assertion, the maximum exposure to the
Company's net earnings would be approximately $65. GWL is vigorously defending its filing position. No amount
has been provided for in the Company's financial statements.
Indemnification Provisions
The Company from time to time enters into agreements in the normal course of its business, such as service and
outsourcing arrangements and leases, and in connection with business or asset acquisitions or dispositions.
These agreements by their nature may provide for indemnification of counterparties. These indemnification
provisions may be in connection with breaches of representation and warranty or with future claims for certain
liabilities, including liabilities related to tax and environmental matters. The terms of these indemnification
provisions vary in duration and may extend for an unlimited period of time. Given the nature of such
indemnification provisions, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate its total maximum potential liability as
certain indemnification provisions do not provide for a maximum potential amount and the amounts are
dependent on the outcome of future contingent events, the nature and likelihood of which cannot be
determined at this time. Historically, the Company has not made any significant payments in connection with
these indemnification provisions.
Note 32. Financial Guarantees
The Company establishes letters of credit used in connection with certain obligations mainly related to real
estate transactions, benefit programs, purchase orders and performance guarantees. The aggregate gross
potential liability related to these letters of credit, not including the standby letters of credit for the benefit of
the independent funding trusts and independent securitization trusts described below, is approximately $441
(2011 – $411). Letters of credit related to the financing program for Loblaw's independent franchisees and
securitization of PC Bank's credit card receivables have been identified as guarantees and are described further
below.
Independent Funding Trusts
The full balance relating to the debt of the independent funding trusts has been consolidated on the balance
sheets of the Company as at year end 2012 and 2011. Loblaw has agreed to provide credit enhancement of $48
(2011 – $48) in the form of a standby letter of credit for the benefit of the independent funding trusts
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 121
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
representing not less than 10% (2011 – 10%) of the principal amount of the loans outstanding. This credit
enhancement allows the independent funding trusts to provide financing to Loblaw's independent franchisees.
As well, each independent franchisee provides security to the independent funding trusts for its obligations by
way of a general security agreement. In the event that an independent franchisee defaults on its loan and
Loblaw has not, within a specified time period, assumed the loan, or the default is not otherwise remedied, the
independent funding trusts would assign the loan to Loblaw and draw upon this standby letter of credit. This
standby letter of credit has never been drawn upon. Loblaw has agreed to reimburse the issuing bank for any
amount drawn on the standby letter of credit.
Independent Securitization Trusts
Letters of credit for the benefit of other independent securitization trusts with respect to the securitization
programs of PC Bank have been issued by major financial institutions. These standby letters of credit could be
drawn upon in the event of a major decline in the income flow from or in the value of the securitized credit card
receivables. Loblaw has agreed to reimburse the issuing banks for any amount drawn on the standby letters of
credit. The aggregate gross potential liability under these arrangements, which represented 9% (2011 – 9%) on a
portion of the securitized credit card receivables amount, was approximately $81 (2011 – $81) (see note 18). The
undrawn commitments on the independent securitization trusts as at year end 2012 was $120 (2011 – $120).
Lease Obligations
In connection with historical dispositions of certain of its assets, Loblaw has assigned leases to third parties.
Loblaw remains contingently liable for these lease obligations in the event any of the assignees are in default of
their lease obligations. The estimated amount for minimum rent, which does not include other lease related
expenses such as property tax and common area maintenance charges, was in aggregate of $13 (2011 – $14).
Additionally, Loblaw has guaranteed lease obligations of a third-party distributor in the amount of
$19 (2011 – $17).
PC Bank
Loblaw has provided a guarantee on behalf of PC Bank to MasterCard® International Incorporated in the amount
of U.S. $230 (2011 – U.S. $180) for accepting PC Bank as a card member and licensee of MasterCard®.
Note 33. Related Party Transactions
The Company's majority shareholder is Mr. W. Galen Weston, who beneficially owns, directly and indirectly
through private companies which he controls, including Wittington, a total of 80,724,599 of the Company’s
common shares, representing approximately 63% (2011 – 63%) of the Company's 128,221,841 outstanding
common shares. The Company's policy is to conduct all transactions and settle all balances with related parties
on market terms and conditions.
Transactions between the Company and its consolidated entities have been eliminated on consolidation and are
not disclosed in this note.
In 2012, rental payments to Wittington by the Company amounted to $4 (2011 – $4). As at year end 2012 and
2011, there were no rental payments outstanding.
In 2012, inventory purchases from Associated British Foods plc, a related party by virtue of Mr. W. Galen Weston
being a director of such entity's parent company, amounted to $26 (2011 – $26). As at year end 2012, $2
(2011 – $2) was included in trade and other payables relating to these inventory purchases.
Post-Employment Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors a number of post-employment plans, which are related parties. Contributions made by
the Company to these plans are disclosed in note 25.
122 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Income Tax Matters
From time to time, the Company and Wittington may enter into agreements to make elections that are
permitted or required under applicable income tax legislation with respect to affiliated corporations. These
elections and accompanying agreements did not have a material impact on the Company.
Compensation of Key Management Personnel
The Company's key management personnel is comprised of certain members of the executive team of GWL,
Loblaw, Weston Foods and Wittington, as well as members of the Boards of GWL, Loblaw and Wittington to the
extent that they have the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the day-to-day
activities of the Company.
Annual compensation of key management personnel that is directly attributable to the Company was as follows:
Salaries, director fees and other short term employee benefits
Share-based compensation
Total compensation
2012
18
8
26
$
$
2011
21
7
28
$
$
Note 34. Subsequent Event
Subsequent to year end 2012, the Company announced changes to certain of its defined benefit pension and
post-employment benefits plans impacting certain employees retiring after January 1, 2015. These changes are
expected to result in a one-time gain of approximately $51, which will be recorded in the first quarter of 2013.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 123
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 35. Segment Information
The Company has two reportable operating segments: Weston Foods and Loblaw. The accounting policies of the
reportable operating segments are the same as those described in the Company's summary of significant
accounting policies (see note 2). The Company measures each reportable operating segment's performance
based on adjusted EBITDA(1) and adjusted operating income(1). Neither reportable operating segment is reliant on
any single external customer.
Revenue
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Intersegment
Consolidated
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Total
Depreciation and Amortization(2)
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Total
Adjusted Operating Income(1)
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Impact of certain items(3)
Other(4)
Consolidated operating income
2012
2011
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,765
31,604
(627)
32,742
334
2,065
2,399
59
777
836
275
1,288
(147)
(24)
1,392
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,772
31,250
(646)
32,376
325
2,134
2,459
60
699
759
265
1,435
(116)
25
1,609
(1) Excludes certain items and is used internally by management when analyzing segment underlying operating performance.
(2) Excludes accelerated depreciation of $4 (2011 – $3) incurred by Weston Foods, included in restructuring and other charges.
(3) The impact of certain items excluded by management includes restructuring and other charges, the fair value adjustment of
commodity derivatives at Weston Foods, share-based compensation net of equity derivatives, the MEPP withdrawal liability
incurred by Weston Foods, the post-retirement plan change at Weston Foods, Weston Foods insurance proceeds, certain prior years'
commodity tax matters at Loblaw, and the gain on sale of a portion of a Loblaw property.
(4) Operating income for the year included a loss of $24 (2011 – gain of $25) related to the effect of foreign currency translation on a
portion of the U.S. dollar denominated cash and short term investments held by foreign operations.
124 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Total Assets
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Other(1)
Consolidated
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
$
$
1,979
18,121
1,704
21,804
$
$
1,875
17,588
1,860
21,323
(1) Other includes cash and cash equivalents and short term investments held by foreign operations that have the same functional
currency as that of the Company.
Additions to Fixed Assets and Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
The Company operates primarily in Canada and the United States.
Revenue (excluding intersegment)
Canada
United States
Consolidated
Fixed Assets and Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Canada
United States
Consolidated
2012
93
1,060
1,153
2012
31,992
750
32,742
$
$
$
$
2011
39
1,001
1,040
2011
31,653
723
32,376
$
$
$
$
As at
Dec. 31, 2012
Dec. 31, 2011
$
$
10,616
407
11,023
$
$
10,331
396
10,727
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 125
Three Year Summary
CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION(1)
As at or for the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
Operating Results
Sales
Operating income
Adjusted operating income(2)
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
Net interest expense and other financing charges(3)
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the Company
Net earnings
Financial Position
Fixed assets
Goodwill and intangible assets
Total assets
Cash and cash equivalents, short term investments
and security deposits
Adjusted debt(2)
Total equity attributable to shareholders of the Company
Total equity
Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating activities
Fixed asset purchases
Free cash flow(2)
Per Common Share ($)
Basic net earnings
Adjusted basic net earnings(2)
Dividend rate at year end
Book value
Market value at year end
Financial Measures and Ratios
Sales growth (%)
Adjusted operating margin (%)(2)
Adjusted EBITDA margin (%)(2)
Interest coverage(2)
Adjusted debt(2) to adjusted EBITDA(2)
Return on average net assets (%)(2)
Return on average common shareholders' equity
attributable to shareholders of the Company (%)
Price/net earnings ratio at year end
2012
2011
2010
32,742
1,392
1,563
2,399
417
486
726
9,452
1,571
21,804
4,075
5,584
5,692
8,070
1,852
1,110
946
3.45
4.46
1.46
38.03
70.75
1.1
4.8
7.3
3.3x
2.3x
10.7
9.3
20.5
32,376
1,609
1,700
2,459
366
635
919
9,172
1,555
21,323
4,101
5,536
5,459
7,680
1,974
1,027
1,051
4.58
4.86
1.44
36.21
68.09
1.7
5.3
7.6
4.4x
2.3x
12.8
13.1
14.9
31,847
1,568
1,659
2,342
471
452
703
8,823
1,554
21,696
5,141
5,833
5,224
7,304
2,279
1,214
967
3.16
4.09
9.19 (4)
34.14
84.20
0.1(5)
5.2
7.4
3.3x
2.5x
13.0
8.4
26.6
(1) For financial definitions and ratios refer to the Glossary beginning on page 130.
(2) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(3) 2012 included a non-cash charge of $35 (2011 – non-cash income of $18) related to the fair value adjustment of the forward sale
agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares (see note 5 to the consolidated financial statements).
Included the special one-time common share dividend of $7.75 per common share.
(4)
(5) Compared to 2009 sales reported under Canadian GAAP.
126 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
SEGMENT INFORMATION(1)
As at or for the years ended December 31
($ millions except where otherwise indicated)
OPERATING RESULTS
Sales
Operating Income
Adjusted Operating
Income(3)
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
FINANCIAL POSITION
Fixed Assets
Total Assets
CASH FLOWS
Fixed Asset Purchases
FINANCIAL MEASURES AND RATIOS
Sales (Decline) Growth (%)
Operating Margin (%)
Adjusted Operating Margin (%)(3)
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)(3)
Return on Average
Net Assets (%)(3)
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Intersegment
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Other(2)
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Other(4)
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
Weston Foods
Loblaw
Consolidated
2012
2011
2010
1,765
31,604
(627)
32,742
228
1,188
(24)
1,392
275
1,288
1,563
334
2,065
2,399
479
8,973
9,452
1,979
18,121
1,704
21,804
93
1,017
1,110
(0.4)
1.1
1.1
12.9
3.8
4.3
15.6
4.1
4.8
18.9
6.5
7.3
24.9
9.8
10.7
1,772
31,250
(646)
32,376
208
1,376
25
1,609
265
1,435
1,700
325
2,134
2,459
447
8,725
9,172
1,875
17,588
1,860
21,323
40
987
1,027
9.1
1.3
1.7
11.7
4.4
5.0
15.0
4.6
5.3
18.3
6.8
7.6
24.5
11.7
12.8
1,624
30,836
(613)
31,847
285
1,339
(56)
1,568
235
1,424
1,659
290
2,052
2,342
446
8,377
8,823
1,800
17,001
2,895
21,696
24
1,190
1,214
(3.7)(5)
0.3(5)
0.1(5)
17.5
4.3
4.9
14.5
4.6
5.2
17.9
6.7
7.4
40.8
11.8
13.0
(1) For financial definitions and ratios refer to the Glossary beginning on page 130.
(2) Operating income for the year included a loss of $24 (2011 – a gain of $25) related to the effect of foreign currency translation on a
portion of the U.S. dollar denominated cash and short term investments held by foreign operations.
(3) See non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51.
(4) Other includes cash and cash equivalents and short term investments held by foreign operations that have the same functional
currency as that of the Company.
(5) Compared to 2009 sales reported under Canadian GAAP.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 127
Earnings Coverage Exhibit to the Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements
The following is the Company's updated earnings coverage ratio for the year ended December 31, 2012 in
connection with the Company's Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus dated May 25, 2011.
Earnings coverage on financial liabilities
2.35 times
The earnings coverage ratio on financial liabilities is equal to consolidated net earnings attributable to
shareholders of the Company (before interest on short term and long term debt, dividends on capital securities
and income taxes) divided by consolidated interest on short term and long term debt and dividends on capital
securities. For purposes of calculating the earnings coverage ratio set forth above, long term debt includes the
current portion of long term debt.
128 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
This page left blank intentionally.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 129
Conversion
A store that changes from one Loblaw banner to another
Loblaw banner.
Corporate stores sales per average square foot
Sales by corporate stores excluding gas bar sales divided
by the average corporate stores' square footage at
year end.
Diluted net earnings per common share
Net earnings available to common shareholders of the
Company less the impact of dilutive items divided by the
weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period adding back the impact of
dilutive items.
Dividend rate per common share at year end
Dividend per common share declared in the fourth
quarter multiplied by four.
Free Cash Flow
Cash flow from operating activities excluding the net
increase (decrease) in credit card receivables less fixed
asset purchases (see non-GAAP financial measures
beginning on page 51).
Gross margin
Sales less cost of inventories sold including inventory
shrink divided by sales.
Interest coverage
Operating income divided by net interest expense and
other financing charges adding back interest capitalized
to fixed assets (see non-GAAP financial measures
beginning on page 51).
Major expansion
Expansion of a store that results in an increase in square
footage that is greater than 25% of the square footage of
the store prior to the expansion.
Minor expansion
Expansion of a store that results in an increase in square
footage that is less than or equal to 25% of the square
footage of the store prior to the expansion.
Net earnings attributable to shareholders
of the Company
Net earnings less non-controlling interests.
Net earnings available to common shareholders
of the Company
Net earnings attributable to shareholders of the
Company less preferred dividends.
Glossary
Adjusted basic net earnings per common share
Basic net earnings available to common shareholders of
the Company adjusted for items that are not necessarily
reflective of the Company's underlying operating
performance divided by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the year (see non-
GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51).
Adjusted debt
Bank indebtedness, short term debt, long term debt,
certain other liabilities and the fair value of certain
financial derivative liabilities less independent
securitization trusts in short term and long term debt,
independent funding trusts and President's Choice Bank's
guaranteed investment certificates (see non-GAAP
financial measures beginning on page 51).
Adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted debt divided by adjusted EBITDA (see non-GAAP
financial measures beginning on page 51).
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted operating income before depreciation and
amortization (see non-GAAP financial measures
beginning on page 51).
Adjusted EBITDA margin
Adjusted EBITDA divided by sales (see non-GAAP financial
measures beginning on page 51).
Adjusted operating income
Operating income adjusted for items that are not
necessarily reflective of the Company's underlying
operating performance (see non-GAAP financial
measures beginning on page 51).
Adjusted operating margin
Adjusted operating income divided by sales (see
non-GAAP financial measures beginning on page 51).
Basic net earnings per common share
Net earnings available to common shareholders of the
Company divided by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period.
Book value per common share
Total equity attributable to shareholders of the Company
less preferred shares outstanding divided by the number
of common shares outstanding at year end.
Capital investment
Fixed asset purchases.
Control label
A brand and associated trademark that is owned by
Loblaw for use in connection with its own products and
services.
130 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Same-store sales
Retail sales from the same physical location for
Canadian stores in operation in that location in both
periods being compared by excluding sales from a store
that has undergone a conversion or major expansion in
the period.
Total equity attributable to common shareholders
of the Company
Total equity less preferred shares outstanding and
non-controlling interests.
Total equity attributable to shareholders
of the Company
Total equity less non-controlling interests.
Weighted average common shares outstanding
The number of common shares outstanding determined
by relating the portion of time within the year the
common shares were outstanding to the total time in
that year.
Year
The Company's year end is December 31. Activities are
reported on a fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest
to December 31, usually 52 weeks in duration, but
includes 53 weeks every 5 to 6 years. The years ended
December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 contained
52 weeks.
New store
A newly constructed store, conversion or major
expansion.
Operating income
Net earnings before net interest expense and other
financing charges and income taxes.
Operating margin
Operating income divided by sales.
Price/net earnings ratio at year end
Market price per common share at year end divided by
basic net earnings per common share for the year.
Renovation
A capital investment in a store resulting in no change to
the store square footage.
Retail sales
Combined sales of stores owned by Loblaw and those
owned by Loblaw's independent franchisees.
Retail square footage
Retail square footage includes corporate and
independent franchised stores.
Return on average common shareholders' equity
attributable to shareholders of the Company
Net earnings available to common shareholders of the
Company divided by average total equity attributable to
common shareholders of the Company.
Return on average net assets
Operating income divided by average total assets
excluding cash and cash equivalents, short term
investments, security deposits, fair value of the forward
sale agreement for 9.6 million Loblaw common shares
and trade and other payables (see non-GAAP financial
measures beginning on page 51).
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 131
Corporate Directory
Board of Directors
W. Galen Weston, O.C., B.A., LL.D.(1*)
Executive Chairman of the Corporation;
Chairman, Holt, Renfrew & Co., Limited,
Brown Thomas Group Limited and
Selfridges & Co. Ltd.; President, The
W. Garfield Weston Foundation; former
Chairman, Loblaw Companies Limited and
former Director Associated British Foods, plc.
A. Charles Baillie, O.C., B.A., M.B.A., LL.D.(2*,3)
Corporate Director; Chair, Alberta Investment
Management Corporation; Retired Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Dominion
Bank; Director, Canadian National Railway
Company and TELUS Corporation; Chancellor
Emeritus, Queen's University; Chair,
Art Gallery of Ontario's Board of Trustees.
Paviter S. Binning, F.C.M.A.
President of the Corporation and former
Chief Financial Officer; former Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Restructuring Officer, Nortel Networks
Corporation; former Director and
Chief Financial Officer, Hanson plc and
Marconi Corporation plc; former Director,
Loblaw Companies Limited.
Warren Bryant, B.S., M.B.A.(2,5*)
Corporate Director; former Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer, Longs
Drug Stores; former Executive, Kroger Co.;
Director, Dollar General Corporation and
OfficeMax Incorporated; Member, Executive
Advisory Committee of the Portland State
University Food Industry Leadership Center.
Peter B.M. Eby, B. Comm., M.B.A.(3)
Corporate Director; former Executive, Nesbitt
Burns Inc., and its predecessor companies;
former Vice-Chairman and Director, Nesbitt
Burns Inc.; Director, Leon's Furniture Limited
and TD Asset Management USA Funds Inc.;
former Director, R. Split II Corp. and Sixty Split
Corp.; former Chairman, Olympic Trust.
Darren Entwistle, B.A., M.B.A.(2)
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director,
TELUS Corporation; Director, Canadian
Council of Chief Executives; former Director,
TD Bank Financial Group and Toronto-Dominion
Bank.
Anthony R. Graham, LL.D.(1,3,4*)
President, Wittington Investments, Limited;
President and Chief Executive Officer, Sumarria
Inc.; President, Selfridges Group Limited;
Director, Loblaw Companies Limited, Power
Corporation of Canada, Power Financial
Corporation, Graymont Limited, Brown Thomas
Group Limited, De Bijenkorf B.V., Holt, Renfrew
& Co., Limited, Selfridges & Co. Ltd. and Grupo
Calidra, S.A. de C.V.; Chairman and Director,
President's Choice Bank; Director, Art Gallery
of Ontario, Canadian Institute for Advanced
Research, Luminato, St. Michael's Hospital
and Trans Canada Trail Foundation and
Chairman of the Ontario Arts Foundation;
former Director, Garbell Holdings Limited.
John S. Lacey, B.A.
Chairman of the Advisory Board, Brookfield
Private Equity Group; Consultant to the Board
and to the Board of Loblaw Companies Limited;
former President and Chief Executive Officer,
The Oshawa Group; Director, Loblaw
Companies Limited, TELUS Corporation and
Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd.; former Chairman
of Alderwoods Group, Inc.; former Director,
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
Isabelle Marcoux, B.A., LL.B.(5)
Chair, Transcontinental Inc.; Director,
Rogers Communications Inc. and Power
Corporation of Canada; Board Member,
Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal.
J. Robert S. Prichard, O.C., O.Ont., LL.B.,
M.B.A., LL.M., LL.D.(1,3*,4)
Non-Executive Chair, Torys LLP; Chair, Bank of
Montreal and Metrolinx; former President and
Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx and Torstar
Corporation; President Emeritus, University of
Toronto; Director, Onex Corporation; former
Director, Torstar Corporation and Four Seasons
Hotels Inc.; Chairman, Penguin Canada;
Vice Chair, Canada's Science Technology &
Innovation Council; Trustee, Hospital for Sick
Children; Member, Canada's Economic Advisory
Council and Ontario's Economic Advisory Panel.
Thomas F. Rahilly, B.A., M.A., LL.B.(2,4,5)
Corporate Director; former Vice-Chairman,
RBC Capital Markets; former Director,
Wittington Investments, Limited.
Barbara Stymiest, B.A., F.C.A.(2,4)
Corporate Director; former Group Head and
Chief Operating Officer, Royal Bank of Canada;
former Chief Executive Officer of TSX Group Inc.;
former Executive Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer, BMO Nesbitt Burns; former
Partner of Ernst & Young LLP; Chair,
Research in Motion Limited (also known as
Blackberry); Director, Sun Life Financial Inc.,
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and
University Health Network.
(1) Executive Committee
(2) Audit Committee
(3) Governance, Human Resource, Nominating
and Compensation Committee
(4) Pension Committee
(5) Environmental, Health and Safety Committee
* Chair of the Committee
Corporate Officers (includes age and years of service)
W. Galen Weston, O.C. (72 and 41 years)
Executive Chairman
Paviter S. Binning (52 and 3 years)
President
Gordon A.M. Currie (54 and 8 years)
Executive Vice President,
Chief Legal Officer
Robert G. Vaux (64 and 15 years)
Executive Vice President,
Corporate Development
Richard Dufresne (47 and 1 year)
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
Robert A. Balcom (51 and 19 years)
Senior Vice President, General Counsel -
Canada and Secretary
132 George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report
Khush Dadyburjor (46 and 2 years)
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Development
J. Bradley Holland (49 and 19 years)
Senior Vice President, Taxation
Geoffrey H. Wilson (57 and 26 years)
Senior Vice President,
Financial Control and Investor Relations
Amy Jane Bull (45 and 9 years)
Vice President, Corporate Development
Allison Doner (36 and 8 years)
Vice President, Controller
David Farnfield (49 and 16 years)
Vice President, Commodities
Atulan Navaratnam (49 and 2 years)
Vice President,
Corporate Development
John Poos (56 and 2 years)
Vice President,
Pension and Benefits
Tamara Rebanks (45 and 12 years)
Vice President,
Community Affairs
Adam Walsh (39 and 8 years)
Vice President, Legal Counsel
John Williams (47 and 2 years)
Vice President, Treasurer
Shareholder and Corporate Information
Executive Office
George Weston Limited
22 St. Clair Avenue East
Toronto, Canada M4T 2S7
Tel: 416.922.2500
Fax: 416.922.4395
www.weston.ca
Stock Exchange Listing and Symbols
The Company's common and preferred shares are listed on the Toronto
Stock Exchange and trade under the symbols: “WN”, “WN.PR.A”,
“WN.PR.C”, “WN.PR.D” and “WN.PR.E”.
Common Shares
At year end 2012, there were 128,221,841 common shares outstanding,
856 registered common shareholders and 47,497,242 common shares
available for public trading.
The average 2012 daily trading volume of the Company's common
shares was 94,104.
Preferred Shares
At year end 2012, there were 9,400,000 preferred shares Series I,
8,000,000 preferred shares Series III, 8,000,000 preferred shares Series
IV and 8,000,000 preferred shares Series V outstanding and 28
registered preferred shareholders. All outstanding preferred shares
were available for public trading.
The average 2012 daily trading volume of the Company's preferred
shares was:
Series I:
Series III:
Series IV:
Series V:
5,029
5,634
5,942
7,557
Common Dividend Policy
The declaration and payment of dividends on the Company's common
shares and the amount thereof are at the discretion of the Board of
Directors which takes into account the Company's financial results,
capital requirements, available cash flow, future prospects of the
Company's business and other factors considered relevant from time to
time. Over the long term, it is the Company's intention to increase the
amount of the dividend while retaining appropriate free cash flow to
finance future growth.
Common Dividend Dates
The declaration and payment of quarterly common dividends are made
subject to approval by the Board of Directors. The anticipated record
and payment dates for 2013 are:
Record Date
March 15
June 15
Sept. 15
Dec. 15
Payment Date
April 1
July 1
Oct. 1
Jan. 1
Normal Course Issuer Bid
The Company has a Normal Course Issuer Bid on the Toronto Stock
Exchange.
Value of Common Shares
For capital gains purposes, the valuation day (December 22, 1971) cost
base for the Company, adjusted for the 4 for 1 stock split (effective
May 27, 1986) and the 3 for 1 stock split (effective May 8, 1998), is
$1.50 per share. The value on February 22, 1994 was $13.17 per share.
Printing: TC Transcontinental Printing www.tcprinting.tc
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
100 University Avenue
Toronto, Canada M5J 2Y1
Toll Free Tel:
International Tel: 514.982.7555 (direct dial)
Fax:
Toll Free Fax:
1.888.453.0330
416.263.9394
1.800.564.6253 (Canada and U.S.A.)
To change your address or eliminate multiple mailings,
or for other shareholder account inquiries, please contact
Computershare Investor Services Inc.
Independent Auditors
KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada
Annual Meeting
The George Weston Limited Annual Meeting of Shareholders
will be held on Thursday May 9, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. at
The Royal Conservatory, TELUS Centre for Performance and
Learning, Koerner Hall, 273 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario,
Canada.
Trademarks
George Weston Limited and its subsidiaries own a number
of trademarks. These trademarks are the exclusive property
of George Weston Limited and its subsidiary companies. Trademarks
where used in this report are in italics.
Investor Relations
Shareholders, security analysts and investment professionals should
direct their requests to Mr. Geoffrey H. Wilson, Senior Vice President,
Financial Control and Investor Relations at the Company's Executive
Office or by e-mail at investor@weston.ca.
Additional financial information has been filed electronically with
various securities regulators in Canada through the System for
Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR). The Company
holds an analyst call shortly following the release of its quarterly results.
These calls are archived in the Investor Centre section of the Company's
website.
This Annual Report includes selected information on Loblaw Companies
Limited, a 62.9%-owned public reporting subsidiary company with
shares trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
Ce rapport est disponible en français.
George Weston Limited 2012 Annual Report 133
This 2012 Annual Report was printed in Canada on
Enviro 100, which contains 100% post-consumer waste
and is processed chlorine-free, using biogas energy.
www.weston.ca