Welcome to a new day. [ Before the sun rises, our customers are ahead of the game. 2 0 0 9 A n n u A l R e p o R t When it comes to productivity, OYO Geospace technology is transforming customer projects around the world. Our customers are miles ahead of schedule before the day even begins. Welcome to a new day. Forward-Looking Statements: All statements in this Annual Report, other than statements of historical fact included herein, including statements regarding potential future products and markets, our potential future revenues, future financial operations, future product lines, growth of product markets and other statements are forward-looking statements for purpose of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act 1934. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including the risks and factors described in the attached Form 10-K. You are cautioned to consider the factors and statements described under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Form 10-K in connection with evaluating any such forward-looking statements. From the Chairman Dear Fellow Shareholders, Fiscal 2009 was quite a year. At the outset of the year plunging commodity prices and imploding credit markets cast a long shadow over exploration and production projects across the energy sector. Rising unemployment rates and deteriorating housing prices froze consumer demand, pressuring businesses across the United States and stalling purchases of capital equipment. In September last year, as we faced this array of external conditions we knew that our businesses would be caught in the downdraft. The question wasn’t if it was going to be a difficult year, but how difficult the year would prove to be. Revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 were $92.9 million, down 31.0%, from the prior fiscal year as a result of the economic slowdown and its impact on our primary businesses – seismic sensors, cables and data acquisition systems for the energy sector and thermal imaging equipment and thermal media products for the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile market sectors. Net income for the year was $1.8 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, as compared to $14.2 million or $2.31 per diluted share in the prior year reflecting both declines in demand in our major markets and the effect of higher manufacturing costs resulting from underutilized manufacturing capacity. in millions $140 $120 $100 $ 80 $ 60 $ 40 $ 20 0 [ 2007 2008 2009 Revenues in millions $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $ 8 $ 6 $ 4 $ 2 0 [ 2007 2008 2009 Net income percent 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 [ 2007 2008 2009 Pretax return on shareholder equity While our operations were hit hard by the headwinds of the economic downturn, we were fortunate: First, because we had focused on consolidating our operations several years ago and had taken the opportunity then to shed facilities and combine complementary workforces across our subsidiaries; we entered this period with one efficient facility and operations designed to be responsive to the ups and downs of economic cycles. When oil and gas prices collapsed last fall, we were able to wind operations down accordingly. n a m r i a h C e h t m o r F Second, our engineering, sales and customer service staffs were able to use the time afforded by the slowdown to work with our customers to further refine and enhance our products so that even during a time of drastically reduced demand we were able to offer new capabilities and make new sales of our autonomous nodal GSR land seismic data acquisition system. Our progress in this area is particularly notable as the sales were made after potential customers conducted extensive reviews and tests of viable alternatives in the marketplace. In July, after an extensive review of all the land seismic system options available – both cabled and autonomous nodal – Viking Geophysical, a new contractor managed by experienced seismic personnel, purchased a 3,000-channel GSR system because of the competitive advantage its deployment would provide. Less than a month after the system’s initial deployment Viking reported that the reliable GSR system with its 33-man crew was already breaking long-standing production records in the region in which it operates. Subsequent to year end, we received a second order from Viking for 1,100 channels with delivery scheduled in our second quarter. In November, Dawson Geophysical chose an 8,000-channel autonomous nodal GSR system for use either as a standalone system or to expand the capabilities of its existing fleet where it could provide additional operational flexibility. Importantly, Dawson selected the GSR after an extensive side-by-side comparison of the GSR with other nodal systems this past autumn. We received three additional orders for the GSR this summer from other customers and since year-end have received a subsequent order from one of the parties to expand channel count. Interest in the GSR is increasing. For the seismic contractor, an autonomous nodal system such as the GSR truly represents a game-changing technology. Our GSR customers began shooting immediately each morning rather than loosing valuable production time repairing interconnecting system cables. With no interconnecting cables to deploy and maintain, autonomous nodal crews are a fraction of the size of their cabled counterparts. With fewer people needed to operate the system, there are fewer health, safety and environmental issues and reduced costs. Moreover, the GSR is so easy to deploy and operate that there is also virtually no learning curve for new field crew members, so the crew is immediately productive. The size and weight of the GSR also enhances the economics and eases the logistics associated with crew mobilization and demobilization. Instead of a lengthy, complicated traditional shipping process, a GSR system can be packed within hours and shipped in a conventional shipping container. 2 oYo Geospace 2 00 9 A new day is dawning in the seismic industry. As oil and gas companies demand higher channel count, seismic surveys and continuous recording capabilities of autonomous nodal systems such as the GSR will rapidly become the industry standard. For contractors seeking viable solutions to large channel count recording challenges, the autonomous nodal GSR system is fully scalable, allowing unlimited channel deployments while yielding higher operational efficiencies. The advantages of the GSR have been well demonstrated in thorough evaluations and field tests. Now the word is rapidly spreading about the system’s routine production performance in the field. Today, we believe more customers are using OYO Geospace’s GSR autonomous nodal system than all other competing nodal systems combined. This establishes OYO Geospace as the leader in converting the industry from cable-based land seismic data acquisition systems to the more efficient and cost effective operations of autonomous nodal seismic data acquisition systems. For OYO Geospace, the development and commercialization of the GSR system is the logical outgrowth of a vision we’ve held since our initial public offering in 1997. While our sales may continue to be constrained this year by capital availability and the downturn in exploration spending, if industry acceptance of the GSR is as strong as current interest levels indicate, we believe we will be ideally situated to capitalize on any improvement in industry fundamentals. Very truly yours, Gary D. Owens Chairman of the Board President & Chief Executive Officer L e t t e r t o S h a r e h o l d e r s o Yo Geos pa c e 2009 3 Seismic Exploration GSR leads the way Success for a seismic contractor today requires adherence to three simple principles. First, conduct a health, safety and environmentally (HSE) acceptable operation. Second, acquire high quality data for customers. And finally, ensure that crews operate efficiently and thus profitably. The Geospace Seismic Recorder (GSR) is continuing to gain traction in the industry by contributing to all three of these operational principles. The GSR represents a step change in seismic exploration. Barriers of time, topography and cost are being shattered by the autonomous nodal technologies employed by the GSR, thus generating impressive productivity gains. Instead of starting each day with hours of cable inspection and maintenance, seismic crews can generally begin operations as soon as sources are operationally available. This can translate to an immediate increase in daily productivity of 30-40%. Seamless operation with less downtime The GSR system features highly efficient battery units capable of supporting continuous recording up to 30 days in temperatures ranging from -40 to +60 degrees C. Batteries take just a few minutes to a few hours to charge, depending on discharge state, thus making them more readily available for redeployment. Today, when a contractor must leave the GSR units deployed for an extended period of time, he can be confident that the system has sufficient power to resume operations without delay. The GSR also features 30 days of continuous recording memory – sufficient to record high quality data continuously without memory exhaustion. 4 oYo Geospace 2 00 9 Enhanced control Enhancements made to the system this year are already leading to record-setting data production levels. These include the development of the comprehensive Field Management Console (FMC) for controlling and monitoring source activity. The FMC enables the operator to control and monitor the performance of every source action, be it vibrator sweep, explosive blast or weight drop, and to identify and address potential problems efficiently. The FMC manages all industry standard source controllers via the GSR Source Interface. When coupled with GSR Line Viewer, the FMC can report and predict spread status for the operator. The GSR Line Viewer’s capabilities have also been enhanced, so that quality control of the line can be accomplished via all-terrain vehicles, line trucks or helicopters. The Line Viewer provides real-time status on the health of the deployed GSR units including the GPS receiver, memory, battery and the geophone/sensor groups attached. Thanks to a simple user interface, line crew personnel can quickly determine the spread status. As more seismic surveys are completed using the GSR, impressive data on the reliability of the system are being accumulated. GSR failure rates as low as 0.02% have been reported, which translates to phenomenal gains in productivity. Faster, simpler transport and deployment The GSR data acquisition system requires fewer personnel to acquire high-quality data reliably and safely. The weight of the field deployed units is approximately 1/10th that of a conventional cabled system. Each GSR and battery weighs less than 2.5 kilograms – less than the weight of a conventional set of geophones. If used with our super efficient GS-One geophone, the weight and time to deploy drops even more dramatically. Less weight translates to easier, faster and safer deployment enabling more cost-effective crew mobilization and demobilization. The GSR Mobile System Manager (MSM), a field enclosure to house data retrieval and data output, source control and monitoring, battery charging and other operational functions concerning in-field management, is constructed to be highly versatile. For maximum mobility, an entire field management system capable of supporting 10,000 stations can be housed in an industry-standard shipping container for fast and efficiently deployment. o Yo Geos p ac e 20 09 5 Greater flexibility With the GSR, channel count is no longer limited by operational issues, and projects can be tailored to the requirement of any client. Areas which present tremendous barriers to conventional cabled systems are easily covered by the GSR. The GSR can also be seamlessly combined with conventional cabled systems to address specific topographic or seismic survey equipment configuration issues. The GSR already outperforms conventional land cabled systems across every important operational metric, but it is only one part of our larger family of land and shallow water system solutions provided by OYO Geospace’s Seismic Exploration Group. From steep mountain ranges across mesas, marshes and swamps to tidal zones, congested harbors and seas complicated by offshore platforms, OYO Geospace can configure the ideal system to meet contractors’ needs on land or in water up to 3,500 meters deep. GSR & GeoRes solve contractor challenges in shallow water When combined with a flotation device (pictured top left), the GSR can be used with confidence in marshes, rivers and lakes in water up to 15 meters deep. For more challenging transition zones or for shallow water reservoir characterization applications, our retrievable GeoRes Dual Sensor Array Shallow Water Systems (pictured middle left) can be configured by customers for operations in three depth ranges: up to 75 meters, 75 to 150 meters and 150 to 300 meters. The dual sensors of the GeoRes shallow water system measure velocity and pressure, which minimizes ghosting, and the arrays are ideally designed to handle the special operational and technical challenges of the transition zone environment. OBR – The autonomous nodal system for marine seismic data acquisition The Ocean Bottom Recorder (OBR) system (pictured bottom left) is the “autonomous nodal” answer for underwater seismic exploration needs. Together the GSR and the OBR can tackle both the land and marine exploration markets simultaneously. The OBR system is available in two versions: a composite model that can be deployed in water depths of up to 750 meters, and a metallic version suitable for use in up to 3,000 meters of water. Easy to deploy and retrieve, each model provides a reliable data acquisition solution for marine environments that contain acquisition obstacles like drilling rigs, production platforms or marine transport systems. 6 oYo Geo space 200 9 Thermal Imaging OYO Instruments is the division addressing the thermal solutions market. We serve the textile, point-of-sale, signage and seismic markets with thermal images, print heads and film solutions as well as our new direct-to-screen imaging product lines. The company rolled out its latest direct-to-screen product, the Goblin, earlier in the year. The company is working on new products to add to its thermal solution markets. Emerging Technologies Our emerging technologies products largely comprise products developed for two markets: 1) cables and umbilicals for use in offshore exploration and production activities and 2) sensors and cables for industrial uses. Although fiscal year 2009 was constrained, new orders for delivery in fiscal year 2010 appear encouraging. Our industrial sensors for vibration monitoring and cables for water meters and GPS-related construction cables showed surprising resilience during the year. While they represent a small part of our overall revenue base, sales in these markets continued to produce profits throughout the year and show potential for further expansion in fiscal year 2010. Demand for our industrial products provides steady utilization of our manufacturing facility. o Yo Geos pa c e 2009 7 Officers and Directors o F F I C e R S D I R e C t o R S Gary D. owens Chairman of the Board Gary D. owens Chairman of the Board President & Chief Executive Officer President & Chief Executive Officer Michael J. Sheen thomas l. Davis, ph.D. Senior Vice President Chief Technical Officer Professor of Geophysics Colorado School of Mines thomas t. Mcentire takashi Kanemori Chief Financial Officer Director and Senior Executive Officer OYO Corporation William H. Moody Retired Partner KPMG Michael J. Sheen Senior Vice President Chief Technical Officer Charles H. Still Partner Kelly Hart & Hallman L.L.P. Richard C. White Consultant Oil and Gas Industry 8 oYo Geo space 2009 2009 Financials 2009 Financials UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K È Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009 OR ‘ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Commission file number 001-13601 OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 76-0447780 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 7007 Pinemont Drive Houston, Texas 77040-6601 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (713) 986-4444 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Common Stock Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered The NASDAQ Global Market Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ‘ No È Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ‘ No È Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant the past 90 was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject days. Yes È No ‘ to such filing requirements for Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ‘ No ‘ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ‘ Accelerated filer È Non-accelerated filer ‘ Smaller reporting company ‘ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ‘ No È There were 6,026,608 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on December 7, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $56 million (based upon the closing price of $13.06 on March 31, 2009, as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market). DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the Registrant’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. Item 1. Business Overview PART I OYO Geospace Corporation is a Delaware corporation incorporated on September 13, 1997. Unless otherwise specified, the discussion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refers to OYO Geospace Corporation and its subsidiaries. We design and manufacture instruments and equipment used in the acquisition and processing of seismic data as well as in the characterization and monitoring of producing oil and gas reservoirs. Demand for our products has been, and will likely continue to be, vulnerable to downturns in the economy and the oil and gas industry in general. During the past 18 months, there has been substantial volatility in oil and natural gas prices. Please refer to the risks discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” for more information. We have been in the seismic instrument and equipment business since 1980 and market our products primarily to the oil and gas industry. We also design, manufacture and distribute thermal imaging equipment and thermal media products targeted at the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile market sectors. We have been manufacturing thermal imaging products since 1995. We report and evaluate financial information for each of these two segments: Seismic and Thermal Solutions. Seismic Products The seismic segment of our business accounts for the majority of our sales. Geoscientists use seismic data primarily in connection with the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves to map potential and known hydrocarbon bearing formations and the geologic structures that surround them. Seismic Exploration Products A seismic energy source and a seismic data recording system are combined to acquire seismic data. We provide many of the components of seismic data recording systems, including data acquisition systems, geophones, hydrophones, multi-component sensors, seismic leader wire, geophone strings, connectors, seismic telemetry cables and other seismic related products. On land, our customers use our data acquisition systems, geophones, leader wire, cables and connectors to receive and measure seismic reflections resulting from an energy source to data recording units, which store information for processing and analysis. In the marine environment, large ocean-going vessels tow long seismic cables known as “streamers” containing hydrophones which are used to detect pressure changes. Hydrophones transmit electrical impulses back to the vessel’s data recording unit where the seismic data is stored for subsequent processing and analysis. Our marine seismic products help steer streamers while being towed and help recover streamers if they become disconnected from the vessel. Our seismic sensor, cable and connector products are compatible with most major competitive seismic data acquisition systems currently in use, and sales result primarily from seismic contractors purchasing our products as components of new seismic data acquisition systems or to repair and replace components of seismic data acquisition systems already in use. During fiscal year 2008, we announced the development of a land-based wireless (or nodal) data acquisition system. Each nodal station operates independently and therefore can be deployed in virtually unlimited channel configurations. Rather than utilizing interconnecting cables as required by most traditional land data acquisition systems, each nodal station operates as an independent data collection system. As a result, our nodal system requires less maintenance, which we believe allows our customers to operate more effectively and efficiently because of its reduced environmental impact, lower weight and ease of operation. Our nodal system is designed into configurations ranging from one to four channels per station. We delivered five of these systems during fiscal years 2008 and 2009 with the largest of these systems containing 3,000 channels. We recently received an order for an 8,000 channel system (four channels per station) and expect to deliver this system during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. 1 In October 2009, we introduced a marine-based nodal data acquisition system. Similar to our land nodal system, the marine nodal system can be deployed in virtually unlimited channel configurations and does not require interconnecting cables between each station. Our deepwater versions of this nodal system can be deployed in depths of up to 3,000 meters. Our wholly-owned subsidiary in the Russian Federation manufactures international standard geophones, sensors, seismic leader wire, seismic telemetry cables and related seismic products for customers in the Russian Federation and other international seismic marketplaces. Operating in foreign locations involves certain risks as discussed under the heading “Risk Factors—Our Foreign Subsidiaries and Foreign Marketing Efforts Face Additional Risks and Difficulties” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Seismic Reservoir Products We have developed permanently installed high-definition reservoir characterization products for ocean- bottom applications in producing oil and gas fields. We also produce a retrievable version of this ocean-bottom system for use on fields where permanently installed systems are not appropriate or economical. Seismic surveys repeated over selected time intervals show dynamic changes within the reservoir and can be used to monitor the effects of production. Utilizing these tools, producers can enhance the recovery of oil and gas deposits over the life of a reservoir. In addition, we produce seismic borehole acquisition systems which employ a fiber optic augmented wireline capable of very high data transmission rates. These systems are used for several reservoir characterization applications, including an application pioneered by us allowing operators and service companies to monitor and measure the results of fracturing operations. Emerging Technology Products Our products continue to develop and expand beyond seismic applications through the utilization of our existing engineering experience and manufacturing capabilities. We design and manufacture power and communication transmission cable products for offshore applications and market these products to the offshore oil and gas and offshore construction industries. These products include a variety of specialized cables, primarily used in deepwater applications, such as remotely operated vehicle (“ROV”) tethers, umbilicals and electrical control cables. These products also include specially designed and manufactured cables, including armored cables, engineered to withstand harsh offshore operating environments. In addition, we design and manufacture industrial sensors for the vibration monitoring and earthquake detection markets. We also design and manufacture other specialty cable and connector products, such as those used in connection with global positioning products and water meter applications. Thermal Solution Products Our thermal solutions product technologies were originally developed for seismic data processing applications. In 1995, we modified this technology for application in other markets. Our thermal printers include both thermal imagesetters for graphics applications and thermal plotters for seismic applications. In addition, our thermal solutions products include direct-to-screen systems, thermal printheads, dry thermal film, thermal transfer ribbon, and other thermal media. Our thermal imaging solutions produce images ranging in size from 12 to 54 inches wide and in resolution from 400 to 1,200 dots per inch. We market our thermal imaging solutions to a variety of industries, including the screen printing, point-of-sale, signage, flexographic and textile markets. We also continue to sell these products to our seismic customers. The quality of thermal imaging is determined primarily by the interrelationship between a thermal printhead and the thermal media, be it film, ribbon, or any other media. We manufacture thermal printheads and thermal film, which we believe will enable us to more effectively match the characteristics of our thermal printers to thermal film, thereby improving print quality, and make us more competitive in markets for these products. 2 We also distribute private label high-quality dry thermal media for use in our thermal printers and direct-to-screen systems. In addition, we are continuously engaged in efforts to develop new lines of dry thermal film and ribbon in order to improve the image quality of our media for use with our printheads. In order to achieve more than marginal growth in our thermal solutions product business in future periods, we believe that it is important to continue our concentration of efforts on both our printhead and media improvements. Products and Product Development Seismic Products Our seismic product lines currently consist of land and marine nodal seismic data acquisition systems, high- definition reservoir characterization products and services, geophones and hydrophones, including multi- component geophones and hydrophones, seismic leader wire, geophone string and acquisition system connectors, seismic telemetry cables, marine seismic cable retrieval and steering devices and specialized data acquisition systems targeted at conventional and niche markets. Our seismic products are compatible with most major seismic data acquisition systems currently in use. We believe that our seismic products are among the most technologically advanced instruments and equipment available for seismic data acquisition. We recently introduced “wireless” land and marine nodal seismic data acquisition systems which allow our customers to deploy an unlimited quantity of autonomous nodal stations without the requirement to deploy and maintain lengthy power/communication cables. Our nodal systems are designed into configurations ranging from one to four channels per station. We delivered five of these single-channel land nodal systems during fiscal years 2008 and 2009 with the largest of these systems containing 3,000 channels. We recently received an order for an 8,000 channel land nodal system (four channels per station) and expect to deliver this system during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. Our high-definition reservoir characterization products include the HDSeis™ product line and a suite of borehole and reservoir characterization products and services. Our HDSeis™ System is a high-definition seismic data acquisition system with flexible architecture that allows it to be configured as a borehole seismic system or as a subsurface system for both land and marine reservoir-monitoring projects. The scalable architecture of the HDSeis™ System enables custom designed system configuration for applications ranging from low-channel engineering and environmental-scale surveys requiring a minimum number of recording channels to high- channel surveys required to efficiently conduct permanent imaging and monitoring. Modular architecture allows virtually unlimited channel expansion. In addition, multi-system synchronization features make the HDSeis™ System well suited for multi-well or multi-site acquisition, simultaneous surface and downhole acquisition and continuous reservoir monitoring projects. reservoir Reservoir characterization requires special purpose or custom designed systems in which portability becomes less critical and functional reliability assumes greater importance. This reliability factor helps assure successful operations in inaccessible locations over a considerable period of time. Additionally, reservoirs located in deepwater or harsh environments require special instrumentation and new techniques to maximize recovery. Reservoir characterization also requires high-bandwidth, high-resolution seismic data for engineering project planning and reservoir management. We believe our HDSeis™ System and tools, designed for cost- effective deployment and lifetime performance, will make borehole and seabed seismic acquisition a cost- effective and reliable process for the challenges of reservoir characterization and monitoring. Our 3D seismic product developments include an omni-directional geophone for use in reservoir monitoring, a compact marine three-component or four-component gimbaled sensor and special-purpose connectors, connector arrays and cases. Our products used in marine seismic data acquisition include our patented marine seismic streamer retrieval devices (“SRDs”). Occasionally, streamer cables are severed and become disconnected from the vessel as a result 3 of obstacles, inclement weather, vessel traffic or human error. Our SRDs, which are attached to the streamer cables, contain air bags which are designed to inflate automatically at a given depth, bringing the severed streamer cables to the surface. These SRDs save the seismic contractors significant time and money compared to the alternative of losing the streamer cable. We also produce seismic streamer steering devices, or “birds,” which are finlike devices that attach to the streamer cable. These birds help maintain the streamer cable at a certain desired depth as it is being towed through the water. In order to take advantage of our existing cable manufacturing facilities and capabilities in Houston, we are designing and selling new cable products to the offshore oil and gas and offshore construction industries. The production of offshore marine cables requires specialized design capabilities and manufacturing equipment. We also utilize these design capabilities and manufacturing equipment reservoir characterization products. We are aggressively working to diversify our seismic product lines as well as utilizing our manufacturing capabilities to develop and produce products for use in other industries. to produce deepwater Thermal Solutions Products Our thermal solutions products include thermal imagesetters for graphics applications and thermal plotters for seismic applications. In addition, our thermal solution products include thermal printheads and thermal media products. We market these products to a variety of industries, including the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile markets. We also sell these products to our seismic customers. We design, manufacture and sell thermal printers with data images ranging in size from 12 to 54 inches wide and resolution ranging from 400 to 1,200 dpi. We also manufacture our own line of thermal film products as well as distribute another brand of thermal film to the users of our thermal printers. In our thermal solutions segments, we derive revenue primarily from the sale of thermal solutions products to our commercial graphics customers. Competition Seismic Products We believe that we are one of the world’s largest manufacturers and distributors of seismic related products. The principal competitors in our seismic business segment for data acquisition systems, geophones, hydrophones, geophone string connectors, leader wire and telemetry cable are SERCEL (a division of CGGVeritas), ION Geophysical (“ION”) and Steward Cable (a division of Amphenol Corporation). Furthermore, entities in China affiliated with SERCEL as well as other Chinese manufacturers, produce low-cost geophones meeting current industry standards. In October 2009, ION announced the creation of a joint-venture with Bureau of Geophysical Prospecting (“BGP”), a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Company, to design and manufacture land-based geophysical products. We believe that the principal keys for success in the seismic instruments and equipment market are technological superiority, product durability, reliability, and customer support. We also believe that price and product delivery are always important considerations for our customers. In general, most customers prefer to standardize geophones and hydrophones, particularly if they are used by seismic companies which have multiple crews which are able to support each other. This standardization makes it difficult for an outside geophone or hydrophone manufacturer to gain market share from other manufacturers with existing customer relationships. As mentioned above, a key factor for seismic instruments and equipment manufacturers is durability under harsh field conditions. Instruments and equipment must meet not only rigorous technical specifications regarding signal integrity and sensitivity, but must also be extremely rugged and durable to withstand the rigors of field use, often in harsh environments. 4 We believe our primary competitors for our “wireless” nodal seismic data acquisition systems are SERCEL, Fairfield Industries and the recently announced joint venture between ION and BGP. With respect to our marine seismic products, we are not aware of any competing companies that manufacture a product functionally similar to our patented seismic streamer retrieval device. We believe our primary competitor in the manufacture of our streamer depth positioning device, or “birds,” is ION. We believe our primary competitors for our deepwater cabled reservoir characterization and monitoring systems are traditional seismic equipment manufacturers or equipment providers such as WesternGeco (a division of Schlumberger), SERCEL and ION. We believe our primary competitors for high-definition borehole seismic data acquisition systems are Avalon and SERCEL. Thermal Solutions Products We believe that the primary competitors to our thermal imaging business segments include emulsion producers like KIWO USA, Inc. as a distributor of direct-to-screen technologies, Colour Scanned Technology as a manufacturer of direct-to-screen technologies, iSys Group as a manufacturer of thermal technologies for oil and gas exploration applications, as well as manufacturers of alternative technologies such as inkjet devices distributed and used for film output. Also, as we advance the resolution capabilities of direct thermal imaging technology, we expose ourselves to additional competition in the more traditional wet-film and direct-to-plate imagesetting marketplace. A key competitive factor in this market is producing equipment that is technologically advanced, yet cost effective. Suppliers We produce our own brand of dry thermal film internally. We also purchase a substantial quantity of dry thermal film directly from Agfa-Gevaert or through its international distributors. We do not currently experience any significant difficulties in obtaining raw materials from our suppliers for the production of our seismic or thermal imaging products. Product Manufacturing and Assembly Our manufacturing and product assembly operations consist of machining or molding the necessary component parts, configuring these parts along with components received from various vendors and assembling a final product. We manufacture seismic equipment to the specifications of our customers. For example, we can armor cables for applications such as deepwater uses. We assemble geophone strings and seismic telemetry cables based on a number of customer choices such as length, gauge, tolerance and color of molded parts. With regard to dry thermal film, we mix and react various chemicals to formulate a reactive layer that is then coated onto a clear polyester film. The film is then coated with a protective topcoat that produces the final product. Upon completion of our manufacturing and assembly operations, we test our final products to the functional and, in the case of seismic equipment, environmental, extremes of product specifications and inspect the products for quality assurance. We normally manufacture and ship our products based on customer orders and, therefore, typically do not maintain significant inventories of finished goods held for sale. Markets and Customers Our principal seismic customers are seismic contractors and major independent and government-owned oil and gas companies that either operate their own seismic crews or specify seismic instrument and equipment preferences to contractors. For our deepwater reservoir characterization products, our customers are generally 5 large international oil and gas companies that operate long-term offshore oil and gas producing properties. Our thermal imaging customers primarily consist of direct users of our equipment as well as specialized resellers that focus on the newsprint, silkscreen and corrugated box printing industries. One customer comprised 12.0%, 11.5% and 12.6% of our revenues during the fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The following table describes our sales by customer type (in thousands): YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 Seismic exploration customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seismic reservoir customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Industrial customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thermal solutions customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $59,084 12,020 7,939 13,028 789 $ 92,578 15,784 10,250 15,201 682 $ 83,193 31,354 7,903 15,312 344 $92,860 $134,495 $138,106 During the last year, there has been substantial uncertainty in the capital markets and access to credit is uncertain. Due to these conditions, certain of our customers may continue to curtail their seismic contracting activities which would result in a decrease in demand for our products. Furthermore, certain of our customers could experience an inability to pay suppliers, including us, in the event they are unable to access the capital markets to fund their business operations. These risks are more fully described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Intellectual Property We seek to protect our intellectual property by means of patents, trademarks, trade secrets and other measures. Although we do not consider any single patent essential to our success, we consider our patent regarding our marine seismic cable retrieval devices to be of particular value to us. This patent is scheduled to expire in 2012. Research and Development We expect to incur significant future research and development expenditures aimed at the development of additional seismic data acquisition products and thermal imaging technologies. We have incurred company- sponsored research and development expenses of $8.1 million, $8.9 million and $7.3 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Employees As of September 30, 2009, we employed approximately 836 people predominantly on a full-time basis, of which approximately 478 were employed in the United States and approximately 321 in the Russian Federation. Our employees in the Russian Federation belong to a national union for machine manufacturers. Our remaining employees are not unionized. We have never experienced a work stoppage and consider our relationship with our employees to be satisfactory. Financial Information by Segment and Geographic Area For a discussion of financial information by segment and geographic area, see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Annual Report on Form 10-K, along with our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities 6 Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our website address is http://www.oyogeospace.com. Item 1A. Risk Factors Risk Factors Commodity Price Levels May Affect Demand for Our Products Demand for many of our products depends primarily on the level of worldwide oil and gas exploration activity. That activity, in turn, depends primarily on prevailing oil and gas prices and availability of seismic data. During periods of improved energy commodity prices, the capital spending budgets of oil and natural gas operators tend to expand, which results in increased demand for our products. Conversely, in periods when these energy commodity prices deteriorate, the demand for our products generally weakens. Historically, the markets for oil and gas have been volatile. During the last 18 months, there has been substantial volatility and a decline in oil and natural gas prices, which are subject to wide fluctuation in response to changes in the supply of and demand for oil and gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factors include the level of consumer demand, weather conditions, domestic and foreign governmental regulations, price and availability of alternative fuels, political conditions and hostilities in the Middle East and other significant oil-producing regions, increases and decreases in foreign supply of oil and gas, prices of foreign imports and overall economic conditions. Any unexpected material changes in oil and gas prices or other market trends that adversely impact seismic exploration activity would likely affect the demand for our products and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity. Our New Products May Not Achieve Market Acceptance Management’s outlook and assumptions are based on various macro-economic factors and internal assessments, and actual market conditions could vary materially from those assumed. In recent years, we have incurred significant expenditures to fund our research and development efforts, and we intend to continue those expenditures in the future. However, research and development is by its nature speculative, and we cannot assure you that these expenditures will result in the development of new products or services or that any new products and services we have developed recently or may develop in the future will be commercially marketable or profitable to us. In particular, we have incurred substantial expenditures to develop our wireless nodal seismic data acquisition systems, as well as other seismic products for reservoir characterization applications. In addition, we try to use some of our capabilities, particularly our cable manufacturing capabilities, to supply products to new markets. Further, we have incurred substantial expense and expended significant effort to develop our thermal solutions products. We cannot assure you that we will realize our expectations regarding acceptance of and revenues generated by our new products and services in existing or new markets. We May Experience Fluctuations in Quarterly Results of Operations Historically, the rate of new orders for our products has varied substantially from quarter to quarter. Moreover, we typically operate, and expect to continue to operate, on the basis of orders in-hand for our products before we commence substantial manufacturing “runs.” The short-term nature of our order backlog generally does not allow us to predict with any accuracy demand for our products more than approximately three months in advance. Thus, our ability to replenish orders and the completion of orders, particularly large orders for deepwater reservoir characterization projects, can significantly impact our operating results and cash flow for any quarter, and results of operations for any one quarter may not be indicative of results of operations for future quarters. These periodic fluctuations in our operating results could adversely affect our stock price. 7 We Have a Relatively Small Public Float, and Our Stock Price May Be Volatile We have approximately 4.0 million shares outstanding held by non-affiliates. This small float results in a relatively illiquid market for our common stock. Our daily trading volume for the year ended September 30, 2009 averaged approximately 42,000 shares. Our small float and daily trading volumes have in the past caused, and may in the future result in, significant volatility in our stock price. Our Credit Risk Could Increase If Our Customers Face Difficult Economic Circumstances We believe that our allowances for bad debts are adequate in light of known circumstances. However, we cannot assure you that additional amounts attributable to uncollectible receivables and bad debt write-offs will not have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations. Many of our seismic customers are not well capitalized and as a result cannot always pay our invoices when due. We have in the past incurred write-offs in our accounts receivable due to customer credit problems. We have found it necessary from time to time to extend trade credit, including on promissory notes, to long-term customers and others where some risks of non-payment exist. With the recent global financial crisis and a tightening of commercial credit availability, some of our customers relying on credit markets as the source of funds for their capital spending may experience significant liquidity difficulties, which increase those credit risks. An increase in the level of bad debts and any deterioration in our credit risk could adversely affect the price of our stock. Our Industry Is Characterized By Rapid Technological Development and Product Obsolescence Our instruments and equipment in both of our business segments are constantly undergoing rapid technological improvement. Our future success depends on our ability to continue to: • • improve our existing product lines, address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers, • maintain a reputation for technological leadership, • maintain market acceptance of our products, • • • anticipate changes in technology and industry standards, respond to technological developments on a timely basis, and develop new markets for our products and capabilities. Current competitors or new market entrants may develop new technologies, products or standards that could render our products obsolete. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing and marketing, on a timely and cost effective basis, product enhancements or new products that respond to technological developments, that are accepted in the marketplace or that comply with new industry standards. We Operate in Highly Competitive Markets The markets for most of our products are highly competitive. Many of our existing and potential competitors have substantially greater marketing, financial and technical resources than we do. Additionally, at least two competitors in our seismic business segment currently offer a broader range of instruments and equipment for sale than we do. Further, certain of our competitors offer financing arrangements to customers on terms that we may not be able to match. In addition, new competitors may enter the market and competition could intensify. As to our thermal solutions products, we compete with other printing solutions, including inkjet and laser printing technologies, many of which are provided by large companies with significant resources. We cannot assure you that sales of our products will continue at current volumes or prices if current competitors or new market entrants introduce new products with better features, performance, price or other characteristics than our products. Competitive pressures or other factors may also result in significant price competition that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. 8 We Have a Limited Market for Our Seismic Products In our seismic business segment, we market our traditional products to seismic service contractors and to large, independent and government-owned oil and gas companies. We estimate that, based on published industry sources, fewer than 50 seismic contracting companies are currently operating worldwide (excluding those operating in Russia and the former Soviet Union, India, the People’s Republic of China and certain Eastern European countries, where seismic data acquisition activity is difficult to verify). We estimate that fewer than 20 seismic contractors are engaged in marine seismic exploration. Due to these market factors, a relatively small number of customers, some of whom are experiencing financial difficulties, have accounted for most of our sales. From time to time these seismic contractors have sought to vertically integrate and acquire our competitors, which has influenced their supplier decisions before and after such transactions. The loss of a small number of these customers could materially and adversely impact sales of our seismic products. We Cannot Be Certain of the Effectiveness of Patent Protection We hold and from time to time apply for certain patents relating to some of our seismic data acquisition and other products. We also own several patents which relate to the development of dry thermal film. We cannot assure you that our patents will prove enforceable or free of challenge, that any patents will be issued for which we have applied or that competitors will not develop functionally similar technology outside the protection of any patents we have or may obtain. Our Foreign Subsidiaries and Foreign Marketing Efforts Face Additional Risks and Difficulties Based on customer billing data, net sales outside the United States accounted for approximately 56.7% of our net sales during fiscal year 2009; however, we believe the percentage of sales outside the United States is much higher as many of our products are first delivered to a domestic location and ultimately shipped to a foreign location. We again expect net sales outside of the United States to represent a substantial portion of our net sales for fiscal year 2010 and subsequent years. Substantially all of our sales from the United States are made in U.S. dollars, though from time to time we may make sales in foreign currencies. As a result, we may be subject to foreign currency fluctuations on our sales. In addition, net assets reflected on the balance sheets of our Russian, Canadian and United Kingdom subsidiaries are booked in foreign currencies and are subject to currency fluctuations. Consequently, significant foreign currency fluctuations could adversely impact our results of operations. Foreign sales are subject to special risks inherent in doing business outside of the United States, including the risk of war, terrorist activities, civil disturbances, embargo and government activities and foreign attitudes about conducting business activities with the United States, all of which may disrupt markets. A portion of our manufacturing is conducted through our subsidiary OYO-GEO Impulse, which is based in the Russian Federation. Our business could be directly affected by political and economic conditions in the Russian Federation. Boycotts, protests, governmental sanctions and other actions in the region could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably. The risk of doing business in the Russian Federation and other economically or politically volatile areas could adversely affect our operations and earnings. Foreign sales are also generally subject to the risk of compliance with additional laws, including tariff regulations and import and export restrictions. Sales in certain foreign countries require prior U.S. government approval in the form of an export license. We cannot assure you that we will not experience difficulties in connection with future foreign sales. Also due to foreign laws and restrictions, should we experience substantial growth in certain foreign markets, for example in the Russian Federation, we may not be able to transfer cash balances to the United States to assist with debt servicing or other obligations. Our subsidiaries in the Russian Federation and in Canada together reported operating losses of $3.3 million in fiscal year 2009 primarily due to difficult seismic market conditions. These market conditions are influenced by macro-economic conditions such as the world-wide economic crisis, credit availability, crude oil and natural 9 gas commodity price volatility and other factors impacting world-wide energy exploration activities. In addition, other factors contributed to these difficult conditions such as high tax regimes, the over-supply of natural gas as recently seen in North America, intense competitive pricing pressures, and reduced demand by our Houston- based operations for products manufactured by our Russian subsidiary. We cannot assure you that these conditions will improve in the near term or that these subsidiaries will not experience these difficult market conditions again in the future, and these subsidiaries may generate future operating losses, asset impairments charges, or closure if we are unable to stabilize their operations. Unfavorable Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations Could Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations The reporting currency for our financial statements is the U.S. dollar. However, certain of our subsidiaries are located in countries other than the United States. The assets, liabilities, revenues and costs of these foreign subsidiaries are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. To prepare our consolidated financial statements, we must translate those assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars at then-applicable exchange rates. Consequently, increases and decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar versus these other currencies will affect the amount of these items in our consolidated financial statements, even if their value has not changed in their original currency. These translations could result in significant changes to our results of operations from period to period. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, approximately 10.0% of our consolidated revenues related to the operations of our foreign subsidiaries. We Rely on a Key Supplier for a Significant Portion of Our Dry Thermal Film While we currently manufacture dry thermal film, we also purchase a large quantity of dry thermal film from a distributor located in the United States. Except for the film produced by us and sold to us by this distributor, we know of no other source for dry thermal film that performs well in our thermal imaging equipment. If we are unable to economically manufacture dry thermal film internally or our distributor were to discontinue supplying dry thermal film or were unable to supply dry thermal film in sufficient quantities to meet our requirements, our ability to compete in the thermal imaging marketplace could be impaired, which could adversely affect our financial performance. We Have Been Subject to Control by a Principal Stockholder At September 30, 2009, OYO Corporation owned indirectly in the aggregate approximately 21.5% of our common stock. Accordingly, OYO Corporation, through its wholly owned subsidiary OYO Corporation U.S.A., is able to exercise substantial influence over our management, operations and affairs. In addition, we currently have, and may continue to have, a variety of contractual relationships with OYO Corporation and its affiliates. These relationships could further enable OYO Corporation to indirectly exert substantial influence on our operations. Our Success Depends Upon a Limited Number of Key Personnel Our success depends on attracting and retaining highly skilled professionals. A number of our employees are highly skilled engineers and other professionals. In addition, our success depends to a significant extent upon the abilities and efforts of the members of our senior management. If we fail to continue to attract and retain such professionals, our ability to compete in the industry could be adversely affected. A General Downturn in the Economy in Future Periods May Adversely Affect Our Business The current downturn in the economy, and any economic slowdown in future periods, could adversely affect our business in ways that we cannot predict. During times of economic slowdown, our customers may reduce their capital expenditures and defer or cancel pending projects. Such developments occur even among customers 10 that are not experiencing financial difficulties. Any economic downturn may adversely affect the demand for oil and gas generally or cause volatility in oil and gas commodity prices and, therefore, adversely affect the demand for our services to the oil and gas industry and related service and equipment. It could also adversely affect the demand for consumer products, which could in turn adversely affect our thermal solutions business. To the extent these factors adversely affect other seismic companies in the industry, there could be an oversupply of products and services and downward pressure on pricing for seismic products and services, which could adversely affect us. Additionally, bankruptcies or financial difficulties among our customers could reduce our cash flows and adversely impact our liquidity and profitability. Global Capital and Credit Market Issues Could Negatively Affect Our Liquidity and Increase Our Costs of Borrowing United States and global credit markets have recently experienced significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which have caused the spreads on prospective debt refinancings to widen considerably. These circumstances materially impacted liquidity in the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive, and in certain cases have resulted in the unavailability of certain types of debt financing. Events affecting the credit markets have also had an adverse effect on other financial markets in the United States, which may make it more difficult or costly in the future for us to borrow additional funds. Our business could also be negatively impacted if our suppliers or customers experience disruptions resulting from tighter capital and credit markets or a slowdown in the general economy. Any of these risks could increase our interest expense, or impair our ability to fund our operations or expand our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties As of September 30, 2009, our operations included the following locations: Location Owned/Leased Approximate Square Footage Use Houston, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ufa, Bashkortostan, Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Calgary, Alberta, Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Luton, Bedfordshire, England . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Beijing, China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased 387,000 77,000 120,000 45,000 8,000 1,000 See Note 1 below See Note 2 below Manufacturing, sales and service Manufacturing, sales and service Sales and service Sales and service We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current and immediately projected needs. (1) This property is located at 7007 Pinemont Drive in Houston, Texas (the “Pinemont facility”). The Pinemont facility contains all manufacturing, engineering, selling, marketing and administrative activities for both the seismic and thermal solution segment of our company in the United States. The Pinemont facility also serves as our company headquarters. Due to capacity constraints and growth expectations, we added 130,000 sq. ft. of manufacturing space and 40,000 sq. ft. of office space and began utilizing this additional space in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007. (2) This property, located at 7334 N. Gessner in Houston, Texas (the “Gessner facility”), previously contained a manufacturing operation and certain support functions. In February 2006, we entered into a seven-year lease with a tenant whereby the tenant agreed to lease portions of the building up to August 15, 2008, and to lease the entire building from August 16, 2008 through February 14, 2013. The lease agreement was recently amended to allow the tenant the option to lease the entire building through July 31, 2020. 11 Item 3. Legal Proceedings From time to time we are a party to what we believe is routine litigation and proceedings that may be considered as part of the ordinary course of our business. On July 8, 2009, we received a complaint filed in the United States District Court in Nevada alleging that the Geospace Seismic Recorder (“GSR”), our newly developed wireless data acquisition system, infringes upon a patent held by Ascend Geo, LLC (“Ascend”). We requested and were granted a change in venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Houston (the “Court”). In addition to monetary damages, Ascend requested a preliminary injunction against future sales by us of the GSR nodal system. We filed our response with the Court requesting that it deny Ascend’s request for a preliminary injunction and, on November 4, 2009, the Court denied Ascend’s request for a preliminary injunction. We strongly believe that the GSR nodal system does not violate Ascend’s patent. We also believe that Ascend’s patent is not valid and we have petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to re-examine its validity. On November 12, 2009, the PTO found that substantial new questions of patentability were raised by the petition as to each of the claims of the Ascend patent and issued an office action rejecting each of the claims based on prior art that we submitted to the PTO. Based on the PTO’s initial finding of invalidity of Ascend’s patent claims, we have petitioned the Court to stay the litigation until the PTO can complete its reexamination of Ascend’s patent. Ascend failed to timely oppose our motion to stay the proceedings, and the matter is now before the court. Ascend has the right to respond to the PTO office action no later than January 12, 2010. We will continue to defend vigorously our right to build and sell our GSR products and based on developments to date, we are optimistic that the matter will be resolved satisfactorily in our favor. At this time, however, we are unable to predict the outcome of our dispute regarding Ascend’s patent or Ascend’s claims. Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders None. 12 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters The following graphs compare the performance of the Company’s common stock with the performance of the Russell 2000 index and the Standard & Poor’s Oil & Gas Equipment and Services index as of each of the dates indicated. COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among OYO Geospace Corporation, The Russell 2000 Index And The S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Index $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 9/04 9/05 9/06 9/07 9/08 9/09 OYO Geospace Corporation Russell 2000 S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services * $100 invested on 9/30/04 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending September 30. Copyright© 2009 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved. The graph assumes $100 invested on September 30, 2004 (a) in the Company’s common stock, (b) in the stocks comprising the Russell 2000 index on that day and (c) in the stocks comprising the Standard & Poor’s Oil & Gas Equipment and Services index on that day. Reinvestment of all dividends on stocks comprising the two indices is assumed. The foregoing graphs are based on historical data and are not necessarily indicative of future performance. These graphs shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to the Regulations of 14A or 14C under the Exchange Act or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “OYOG”. On December 7, 2009, there were approximately 21 holders of record of our common stock, and the closing price per share on such date was $33.00 as quoted by The NASDAQ Global Market. 13 The following table shows the high and low per share sales prices for our common stock reported on The NASDAQ Global Market. Year Ended September 30, 2009: Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Quarter Low High $19.05 12.52 9.00 15.37 $ 28.62 26.24 23.60 40.73 Year Ended September 30, 2008: Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Quarter $33.12 41.01 39.89 68.90 $ 59.40 67.85 76.74 110.47 Since our initial public offering in 1997, we have not paid dividends, and we do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We presently intend to retain our earnings for use in our business, with any future decision to pay cash dividends dependent upon our growth, profitability, financial condition and other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Our existing credit agreement also has covenants that materially limit our ability to pay dividends. For a discussion of our credit agreement, see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation— Liquidity and Capital Resources” contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following equity plan information is provided as of September 30, 2009: Equity Compensation Plan Information Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (a) Weighted-average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (b) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a)) (c) 466,350 $14.10 198,896 1,900 $13.26 18,900 Plan Category Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The securities are to be issued pursuant to the Company’s 1999 Broad-Based Option Plan. A description of such plan is provided in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 14 Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data The following table sets forth certain selected historical financial data on a consolidated basis. The selected consolidated financial data was derived from our consolidated financial statements. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. When reviewing the table below, please also note the recent transactions and new accounting pronouncements described in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies”, contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Year Ended September 30, 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Statement of Operations Data: Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development Bad debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain (loss) on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes, and minority interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before minority interest Minority interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average shares outstanding: 92,860 66,287 26,573 14,572 8,062 318 22,952 (12) 3,609 (298) 3,311 1,551 1,760 — 1,760 0.30 0.29 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 134,495 87,441 $ 138,106 87,587 $ 103,700 67,397 $ 47,054 50,519 36,303 16,913 8,945 1,615 27,473 604 20,185 233 20,418 6,266 14,152 — 14,152 2.40 2.31 $ $ $ 16,492 7,327 236 24,055 1,655 28,119 118 28,237 8,638 19,599 — 19,599 3.38 3.23 $ $ $ 14,912 6,634 208 21,754 (98) 14,451 (204) 14,247 4,477 9,770 — 9,770 1.72 1.64 $ $ $ 72,823 50,947 21,876 13,146 4,960 337 18,443 (26) 3,407 (44) 3,363 812 2,551 (44) 2,507 0.45 0.44 Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,950,403 6,079,378 5,908,727 6,116,039 5,793,840 6,063,446 5,686,600 5,955,912 5,606,858 5,743,601 Other Financial Data: Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 5,472 1,709 $ 4,598 9,796 3,912 17,007 $ $ 4,499 4,775 4,150 6,247 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 As of September 30, (in thousands) Balance Sheet Data: Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Short-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 82,842 141,482 728 8,820 118,658 $ 82,475 159,380 709 19,526 117,363 $ 60,329 128,162 322 5,147 102,370 $ 50,615 109,176 312 7,440 75,767 $ 40,501 84,422 340 10,731 62,606 We did not declare or pay any dividends during any of the periods noted in the above tables. 15 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the major elements of our consolidated financial statements. You should read this discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements, including the accompanying notes, and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including under the heading “Risk Factors”. The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations includes various forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and services and our future plans and results. These statements are based on assumptions that we consider to be reasonable, but that could prove to be incorrect. For more information regarding our assumptions, you should refer to the section entitled “—Forward-Looking Statements and Assumptions” contained in this Item 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Background We design and manufacture instruments and equipment used in the acquisition and processing of seismic data as well as in the characterization and monitoring of producing oil and gas reservoirs. We have been in the seismic instrument and equipment business since 1980 and market our products primarily to the oil and gas industry. We also design, manufacture and distribute thermal imaging equipment and thermal media products targeted at the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile market sectors. We have been manufacturing thermal imaging products in our Thermal Solutions segment since 1995. For a more detailed discussion of our business segments and products, see the information under the heading “Business” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Worldwide Economic Crisis Demand for many of our products depends primarily on the level of worldwide oil and gas exploration activity. That activity, in turn, depends primarily on prevailing oil and gas prices and availability of seismic data. The recent domestic financial crisis arising out of the meltdown of the subprime lending market has caused significant distress to many global financial lending institutions, leading to a broader global financial crisis and a tightening of the availability of commercial credit. While some signs of an economic recovery are present, many economists have predicted a prolonged worldwide economic recession and a slow recovery in the credit markets. These recessionary fears, combined with a decline in worldwide demand for energy, have caused energy commodity prices to decline substantially from an all-time high of approximately $145 per barrel in July 2008. As expected, these events have led to a decline in energy exploration activities in North America and in certain international markets, and we began to see the effects of this decline on our business during the first fiscal quarter of 2009. We have seen demand for many of our seismic exploration products decline, including significant declines in our Russian and Canadian seismic exploration markets. We believe some of our seismic customers may not possess the financial resources to survive a prolonged downturn in energy exploration, while others have scaled back their activities until financial markets stabilize and demand for exploration activities increases. The uncertainty of these global economic matters and their ultimate impact on energy exploration activities and on our customers’ ability to access credit markets is difficult to forecast, and a decline in the demand for our seismic exploration products is likely to continue for the present time. Due to the sporadic demand for our seismic reservoir products, we have often described this portion of our seismic business as “lumpy”. In this current environment, we expect our seismic business levels will be even more erratic. Singular events may result in severe swings in our future revenues in both positive and negative directions. If these economic events continue into the foreseeable future, they could have a material adverse impact on our revenues and profits for fiscal year 2010 and in future years. We continue to monitor the impact that these economic conditions may have on our operations. We believe that our current cash balances, cash flows from operations and cash borrowings available under our credit facility will provide sufficient resources to meet our working capital liquidity needs for the next twelve months. Consolidated Results of Operations The economic slowdown adversely affected our product revenues in fiscal year 2009. In fiscal year 2009, we experienced declines in almost every major product category in each of our business segments. We have not 16 sold any large-scale seabed reservoir characterization products since fiscal year 2007. These reservoir characterization products generally have higher profit margins than our traditional seismic exploration products. In fiscal years 2008 and 2009, revenues from our reservoir characterization products declined substantially from fiscal year 2007 when we recognized $16.2 million of revenues from the sale of a seabed reservoir characterization system. As we have reported in the past, our sales and operating profits have varied significantly from quarter-to-quarter, and even year-to-year, and are expected to continue that trend in the future, especially when our quarterly financial results are impacted by the presence or absence of these relatively large, but somewhat erratic, shipments of seismic seabed and/or borehole reservoir characterization systems. At present, we do not have any large orders for seabed reservoir characterization products in our backlog, although, we remain optimistic about on-going discussions with customers concerning these products. The quote-to-contract time for large permanent and retrievable seabed seismic data acquisition systems is generally quite long, and since these sales are not recognized in our financial statements until the products are shipped and/or accepted by our customer, the exact timing of any future sales can dramatically affect our quarterly results. In fiscal year 2009, our subsidiaries located in the Russian Federation and in Canada experienced significant declines in sales and, together, generated operating losses of $3.3 million. The difficult seismic market conditions in the Russian Federation resulted from a decline in oil exploration activities precipitated in part by the severe drop in crude oil commodity prices (relative to prices in prior years) and a higher federal tax imposed upon Russian producers of crude oil for export. In addition, our Houston-based manufacturing operation significantly reduced the purchase of products manufactured by our Russian subsidiary in an effort to stabilize and eventually reduce our consolidated inventory levels. The resulting low factory utilization combined with intense competition for declining seismic product orders in the Russian market contributed to the poor financial results of our Russian subsidiary during fiscal year 2009. In regards to our subsidiary in Canada, high levels of natural gas storage and low natural gas demand in North America significantly reduced natural gas-oriented seismic exploration activities both in the United States and in Canada, resulting in low levels of product sales and the under- utilization of our seismic rental equipment. The lower level of sales recorded by our Canadian subsidiary was not adequate to offset fixed costs associated with rental equipment depreciation and facility utilization as well as general overhead costs. We expect these difficult seismic market conditions in the Russian Federation and in Canada to continue into fiscal year 2010 and future operating losses are likely in the near-term; however, we believe the operating results of these subsidiaries in fiscal year 2010 will improve from fiscal year 2009. We report and evaluate financial information for two segments: Seismic and Thermal Solutions. Summary financial data by business segment follows (in thousands): Year Ended September 30, 2009 2008 2007 Seismic Exploration product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reservoir product sales and services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Industrial product sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total seismic sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $59,084 12,020 7,939 79,043 10,591 $ 92,578 15,784 10,250 118,612 27,078 $ 83,193 31,354 7,903 122,450 35,873 Thermal Solutions Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,028 370 15,201 1,283 15,312 617 Corporate Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 789 (7,352) 682 (8,176) 344 (8,371) Consolidated Totals Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,860 3,609 134,495 20,185 138,106 28,119 17 Overview Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008 Consolidated net sales for fiscal year 2009 decreased $41.6 million, or 31.0%, from fiscal year 2008. The decrease in sales stems from the decline in customer demand for our seismic products as a result of the effects of the worldwide economic slowdown and its impact on energy exploration activities. Consolidated gross profits for fiscal year 2009 decreased by $20.5 million, or 43.5%, from fiscal year 2008. The decline in gross profits was caused by a decline in sales of our products, competitive pricing initiatives and higher manufacturing costs resulting from under-utilized factory capacity. Consolidated operating expenses for fiscal year 2009 decreased $4.5 million, or 16.5%, from fiscal year 2008. Reduced operating expenses reflect initiatives taken by management in response to the decline in sales, and also reflect a $1.9 million reduction of incentive compensation expenses caused by lower consolidated pretax profits. The U.S. statutory rate applicable to us for the periods reported was 34.0% and 35.0%, respectively; however, our effective tax rate was 46.8% and 30.7% for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively. The higher effective tax rate for fiscal year 2009 resulted primarily from pretax losses in foreign taxing jurisdictions having lower statutory tax rates than the U.S. statutory rate. The lower tax rate in fiscal year 2008 resulted from pretax income earned in foreign taxing jurisdictions having lower statutory tax rates than the U.S. statutory tax rate, and the impact of research and experimentation tax credits available in the United States. Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007 Consolidated net sales for fiscal year 2008 decreased $3.6 million, or 2.6%, from fiscal year 2007. The decrease in net sales resulted from the revenue recognition in fiscal year 2007 of $16.9 million from reservoir characterization systems, including a $16.2 million system sold to BP for installation in the Caspian Sea. Excluding the impact of the $16.9 million reservoir characterization systems in fiscal year 2007, our net sales for fiscal year 2008 increased $13.3 million, or 11.0%, from the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year primarily due to stronger sales of our other seismic products. Sales of large scale systems like the $16.2 million system sold to BP are infrequent and generally do not recur in each subsequent quarter. Consolidated gross profits for fiscal year 2008 decreased by $3.5 million, or 6.9%, from fiscal year 2007. Decreased gross profits resulted from lower sales, and from the revenue recognition of the $16.2 million permanent reservoir characterization system in fiscal year 2007, which, like all reservoir characterization systems, yielded a significantly higher gross profit margin than our other products. Consolidated operating expenses for fiscal year 2008 increased $3.4 million, or 14.2%, from fiscal year 2007. Such increase primarily resulted from (i) a $1.6 million increase in product development expenses resulting from new product introductions, including our wireless data acquisition system, and (ii) an increase of $1.4 million in bad debt expense primarily caused by the deteriorating financial condition of a seismic customer. Included in our fiscal year 2008 operating income is a $0.7 million gain from the sale of a portion of a surplus property located in the Russian Federation. In fiscal year 2007, we recognized a $1.7 million gain from the sale of the remaining portion of this surplus property. The U.S. statutory rate applicable to us for the periods reported was 35.0% and 34.0%, respectively; however, our effective tax rate was 30.7% and 30.6% for fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. These lower effective tax rates included tax benefits resulting from (i) lower tax rates applicable to income earned in foreign jurisdictions, (ii) manufacturers’/producers’ deduction, (iii) research and experimentation tax credits, and (iv) extraterritorial income deduction in fiscal year 2007. 18 Segment Results of Operations Seismic Products Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008 Net Sales. Sales of our seismic products for fiscal year 2009 decreased $39.6 million, or 33.4%, from fiscal year 2008. The decline in sales is due to a decline in the demand for all of our seismic products, including a $10.7 million decline in sales from our Russian and Canadian operations. Reduced product demand resulted from a reduction in oil and gas exploration and development activities precipitated by the global economic crisis and the prevailing uncertainty about future oil and gas commodity prices. Operating Income. Operating income from sales of our seismic products for fiscal year 2009 decreased $16.5 million, or 60.9%, from fiscal year 2008. The decline in our operating income is directly related to the significant decline in our seismic product sales, competitive pricing initiatives and under-utilization of our manufacturing capacity. In particular, our Russian and Canadian subsidiaries generated $3.3 million of operating losses during fiscal year 2009 due to significantly lower sales, under-utilization of plant and equipment, and intense pricing pressures from competitors for our commodity seismic products. While we are giving substantial attention to this situation, we expect such operating losses in Russia and Canada to continue in the near-term until local market conditions improve. Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007 Net Sales. Sales of our seismic products for fiscal year 2008 decreased $3.8 million, or 3.1%, from fiscal year 2007. Our fiscal year 2008 seismic exploration product sales increased $9.4 million and our industrial product revenues increased by $2.3 million. However, our fiscal year 2008 seismic reservoir product and service sales decreased by $15.6 million primarily due to the $16.2 million seabed reservoir characterization system sold to BP in fiscal year 2007 without any similar seabed reservoir characterization sale recurring in fiscal year 2008. Operating Income. Operating income from sales of our seismic products for fiscal year 2008 decreased $8.8 million, or 24.5%, from fiscal year 2007. The decrease in operating income in fiscal year 2008 primarily resulted from a decline in reservoir characterization system product sales and a decline in gains resulting from the sale of a surplus property. Thermal Solutions Products Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008 Net Sales. Sales of our thermal solutions products for fiscal year 2009 decreased $2.2 million, or 14.3%, from fiscal year 2008. The decline in sales resulted from weaker demand of all thermal product categories due to a weakening economic climate and tight credit markets impacting many of our smaller customers in this business segment. Operating Income. Our operating income from our thermal solutions products for fiscal year 2009 decreased $0.9 million, or 71.2%, from fiscal year 2008. The decline in operating income is caused by the decline in our thermal product sales and higher manufacturing costs. Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007 Net Sales. Sales of our thermal solutions products for fiscal year 2008 decreased $0.1 million, or 0.7%, from fiscal year 2007. There were no substantial sales increases or decreases in any product category. Operating Income. Our operating income from our thermal solutions products for fiscal year 2008 increased $0.7 million, or 107.9%, from fiscal year 2007. The increase in operating income resulted from improvements in 19 manufacturing processes resulting in significant cost reductions. Such increases in operating income were partially offset by higher operating expenses for selling, advertising, and product development expenses associated with new product introductions in fiscal year 2008. Facilities Expansion In fiscal year 2007, we completed a construction project to expand our Pinemont facility manufacturing space to approximately double its original size. The total cost of this facility expansion, including initial machinery and equipment purchases, was $14.5 million. Costs for the facility expansion and machinery and equipment were funded from our internal cash flows and from borrowings under the Credit Agreement, discussed below under the heading “—Liquidity and Capital Resources”. In March 2008, we entered into an $8.8 million long-term loan secured by a mortgage on our Pinemont facility and used the proceeds to repay an existing $2.6 million mortgage on the Pinemont facility and borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Incentive Compensation Program Despite the economic slowdown and the challenges our business faced as a result, we adopted an incentive compensation program for fiscal year 2009 whereby most employees were eligible to begin earning incentive compensation if the Company reached a five percent pretax return on stockholders’ equity, determined as of September 30, 2008. We believe that our employees saw the incentive compensation program as a reason to continue to forge ahead. To be eligible to participate in this incentive compensation program, employees must participate in our Core Values Program. Based on our experience in prior years, we expect one hundred percent of our eligible employees to participate in the Core Values Program. The incentive compensation program did not apply to the employees of our Russian subsidiary as such employees participate in a locally administered bonus program. Certain non-executive employees were required to achieve specific goals to earn a significant portion of their total incentive compensation award. Had any bonus awards been earned under this program in fiscal year 2009, such awards would have been paid out to eligible employees after the end of fiscal year 2009. Based on the level of pretax earnings for fiscal year 2009, no bonuses were earned or accrued at September 30, 2009. Under a similar program in fiscal year 2008, we accrued $3.1 million of incentive compensation expense for fiscal year 2008. This accrual represented approximately 84% of the aggregate bonus allowed under the fiscal year 2008 incentive compensation program. Liquidity and Capital Resources At September 30, 2009, we had $8.6 million in cash and cash equivalents. For fiscal year 2009, we generated approximately $17.3 million of cash in operating activities. Sources of cash generated in our operating activities resulted from net income of $1.8 million. Additional sources of cash include net non-cash charges of $7.5 million for deferred income tax expense, depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, inventory obsolescence and bad debts. Other sources of cash included a $14.3 million decrease in accounts and notes receivable due to improved collections and lower levels of product sales, and a $3.2 million decrease in inventories. These sources of cash were offset by (i) a $4.2 million decrease in accrued expenses primarily resulting from a decline in payroll-related costs due to employee headcount reductions and lower incentive compensation costs resulting from lower levels of pretax income, (ii) a $3.4 million decrease in accounts payable due to declines in purchases of raw materials and other expense reductions and (iii) a $1.4 million decrease in income taxes payable primarily resulting from the decrease in taxable income. Throughout most of fiscal year 2008, we were in a period of significant demand for our products as well as the development of new product technologies, which resulted in a build-up of our inventory levels to be able to meet actual and anticipated future customer demand. Although our levels of inventory declined in fiscal year 2009, we continue to be subject to high levels of inventory obsolescence expense since our exposure to obsolete and slow moving inventories continues in the current environment. We are giving substantial attention to the management of our inventories in this context. 20 For fiscal year 2009, we used approximately $1.7 million of cash in investing activities resulting from our capital expenditures. We estimate that our total capital expenditures in fiscal year 2010 will be approximately $3.5 million. We expect these capital expenditures will be financed from our internal cash flow and/or from borrowings under our Credit Agreement. For fiscal year 2009, we used approximately $9.7 million of cash in the financing activities of our operations, resulting from $10.0 million of principal payments under the Credit Agreement and $0.7 million principal payments for our mortgage loans. These uses of cash were offset by $1.0 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and related tax benefits. At September 30, 2008, we had $1.6 million in cash and cash equivalents. For fiscal year 2008, we used approximately $8.0 million of cash in operating activities. Sources of cash generated in our operating activities primarily resulted from our net income of $14.2 million. Additional sources of cash included non-cash charges to our net income of $0.4 million for deferred taxes, $4.6 million for depreciation and amortization, $1.6 million for bad debts, and $1.0 million for inventory obsolescence. These sources of cash were more than offset by (i) a $15.1 million increase in inventories resulting from the production of new products (primarily for our new wireless data acquisition system) and from growth in our work-in-process inventories resulting from an increase in our customer order backlog, (ii) a $13.7 million increase in trade accounts and notes receivable resulting from sales to customers requesting long-term financing assistance combined with a general increase in collection days, and (iii) the removal of a $0.6 million gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment. For fiscal year 2008, we used approximately $9.1 million of cash in investing activities, including $9.8 million for capital expenditures, which was partially offset by $0.7 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment, primarily from the sale of a portion of a surplus property located in the Russian Federation. For fiscal year 2008, we generated approximately $16.4 million of cash in the financing activities of our operations, resulting from (i) $9.1 million of net borrowings under the Credit Agreement, (ii) $8.8 million borrowed under a term loan secured by a mortgage on our Pinemont facility and (iii) $1.6 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and related tax benefits. These sources of cash were offset by $3.1 million of principal payments under mortgage loans. At September 30, 2007, we had $3.0 million in cash and cash equivalents. For fiscal year 2007, we generated approximately $12.4 million of cash in operating activities. The cash generated in operating activities primarily resulted from net income of $19.6 million, which includes non-cash charges of $3.5 million for deferred taxes, stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization. Other sources of cash from operating activities and changes in our working capital accounts included (i) a $2.5 million increase in accrued expenses and other primarily due to increased accrual for unpaid incentive compensation and product warranty expense, (ii) a $1.7 million additional reserve for bad debts and inventory obsolescence, and (iii) a $1.2 million increase in accounts payable primarily resulting from increased levels of inventories and fixed assets. These sources of cash were partially offset by (i) a $7.7 million decrease in deferred revenue resulting from the recognition of revenue of a large reservoir characterization system in our first quarter, (ii) a $2.3 million increase in inventories resulting from new and anticipated customer orders, and (iii) a $3.3 million increase in accounts and notes receivable resulting from increased sales. For fiscal year 2007, we used approximately $15.1 million of cash in investing activities, including $17.0 million for capital expenditures, which was partially offset by $1.9 million of cash proceeds from the sale of property and equipment, primarily from the sale of a portion of a surplus property located in the Russian Federation. For fiscal year 2007, we generated approximately $2.7 million of cash in the financing activities of our operations, including a $3.1 million excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation and $2.5 million received from the exercise of stock options by employees and directors. These sources of cash were partially offset by $2.3 million of net principal payments under our Credit Agreement. 21 On November 22, 2004, several of our subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “Original Credit Agreement”) with a bank. The Original Credit Agreement has been amended periodically since 2004, and most recently on April 30, 2009 (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit Agreement, our borrower subsidiaries can borrow up to $25.0 million principally secured by their accounts receivable, inventories and equipment. The Credit Agreement expires on April 30, 2011. The Credit Agreement limits the incurrence of additional indebtedness, requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, restricts our and our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends and contains other covenants customary in agreements of this type. We believe the most restrictive covenants in the Credit Agreement are (i) the fixed charge coverage ratio of EBITDA to certain charges, and (ii) the cash flow leverage ratio of total borrowings (excluding real estate borrowings) to adjusted EBITDA. We believe these covenants are more restrictive than covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as in effect prior to the April 30, 2009 amendment, and future borrowings available under the Credit Agreement could be limited or completely restricted if future operating results deteriorate. The interest rate for borrowings under the Credit Agreement is a LIBOR based rate with a margin spread of 300-400 basis points depending upon the maintenance of certain ratios. At September 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement, standby letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $0.9 million and additional borrowings available of $15.9 million. We anticipate that the existing cash balance as of September 30, 2009, cash flow from operations and borrowings available under the Credit Agreement will provide adequate cash flows and liquidity for the next twelve months to satisfy capital expenditure requirements and scheduled debt payments to fund operations. On March 13, 2008, we obtained an $8.8 million mortgage from a bank. The proceeds were used to payoff our existing $2.6 million mortgage on the Pinemont facility and the remaining proceeds were used to repay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The mortgage is collateralized by the Pinemont property and buildings. The mortgage interest rate is a floating rate based on LIBOR plus 150 basis points. A summary of future payments owed for contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of September 30, 2009 are shown in the table below (in thousands): Contractual Obligations: Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commercial Commitments: Payment Due By Period Total Less Than 1 Year 1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years After 5 Years $9,548 $728 $1,520 $1,360 $5,940 Lines of Credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — Total Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $9,548 $728 $1,520 $1,360 $5,940 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We do not have any obligations which meet the definition of an off-balance sheet arrangement and which have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial statements or the items contained therein that are material to investors. Critical Accounting Policies The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We consider many factors in selecting appropriate operational and financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of these financial statements. We continually evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad 22 debt reserves, inventory obsolescence reserves, self-insurance reserves for medical expenses, product warranty reserves, intangible assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax assets. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other factors, including the impact from the current economic conditions, that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different conditions or assumptions. Our long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The impairment review, if necessary, includes a comparison of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by an asset group with the associated carrying value of the related assets. If the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the expected future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of the asset group exceeds its fair value. At September 30, 2009, we reviewed the long-lived assets of our subsidiary in the Russian Federation and concluded that no impairment was present. Management makes judgments regarding the interpretation of tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and causes changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, we operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and are subject to audit in these jurisdictions as well as by the Internal Revenue Service. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all open tax years. The potential outcomes of examinations are regularly assessed in determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes and income tax liabilities. Management believes that adequate provisions have been made for reasonable and foreseeable outcomes related to uncertain tax matters. We record a write-down of our inventories when the cost basis of any manufactured product, including any estimated future costs to complete the manufacturing process, exceeds its net realizable value. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (as determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market value. Our subsidiary in the Russian Federation uses an average cost method to value its inventories. We periodically review the composition of our inventories to determine if market demand, product modifications, technology changes, excessive quantities on-hand and other factors hinder our ability to recover its investment in such inventories. Management’s assessment is based upon on historical product demand, future product demand and various other judgments and estimates. Inventory obsolescence reserves are recorded when such assessments reveal that portions or components of our inventory investment will not be realized in our operating activities. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of purchased businesses over the estimated fair value of the acquired business’ net assets. Intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives; however, no maximum life applies. We no longer record goodwill amortization expense and we review the carrying value of goodwill and other long-lived assets to determine whether there has been an impairment since the date of the relevant acquisition. We have elected to make September 30 the annual impairment assessment date and will perform additional interim impairment tests if a change in circumstances occurs that would indicate that the carrying value of long-lived assets may exceed their fair value amount. Under the fair value framework and the lack of quoted prices for identical items or an independent market analysis, we estimate the fair market value based on Level 3 inputs using both a market and income based approach. The goodwill impairment is tested at our Company’s seismic segment level as the goodwill relates to the purchase of several seismic related companies. The impairment test uses a weighted average cost of capital. The growth rate is based on the projected inflation rate. The assessment is performed in two steps: step one is to test for potential impairment and if potential losses are identified, step two is to measure the impairment loss. We performed step one as of September 30, 2009 and found that there were no impairments at that time; thus, step two was not necessary. We primarily derive revenue from the sale, and short-term rental under operating leases, of seismic instruments and equipment and thermal solutions products. We generally recognize sales revenues when our products are shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. We recognize rental revenues as 23 earned over the rental period. Rentals of our equipment generally range from daily rentals to rental periods of up to nine months or longer. Except for certain of our reservoir characterization products, our products are generally sold without any customer acceptance provisions and our standard terms of sale do not allow customers to return products for credit. In instances where the customer requires a significant performance test for our new and unproven products, we do not recognize the revenue attributable to the product as to which the performance test applies until the performance test is satisfied. Collection of revenue from the sale of large-scale reservoir characterization products may occur at various stages of production or after delivery of the product, and the collected funds are not refundable to the customer. Most of our products do not require installation assistance or sophisticated instruction. We offer a standard product warranty obligating us to repair or replace equipment with manufacturing defects. We maintain a reserve for future warranty costs based on historical experience or, in the absence of historical experience, management estimates. We record a write-down of inventory when the cost basis of any item (including any estimated future costs to complete the manufacturing process) exceeds its net realizable value. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. We operate under a purchase order/contract system for goods sold to customers, and under rental/lease agreements for equipment rentals. These documents evidence that an arrangement exists. • Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For product sales, we do not recognize revenues until delivery has occurred or performance tests are met. For rental revenue, we recognize revenue when earned. • The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable. Sales prices are defined in writing in a customer’s purchase order, purchase contract or equipment rental agreement. • Collectibility is reasonably assured. We evaluate customer credit to ensure collectibility is reasonably assured. Occasionally, our seismic customers are not able to take immediate delivery of products which were specifically manufactured to the customer’s specifications. These occasions generally occur when customers face logistical issues such as project delays or with their seismic crew deployment. In these instances, our customers have asked us to hold the equipment for a short period of time until they can take physical delivery of the product (referred to as “bill and hold” arrangements). We consider the following criteria for recognizing revenue when delivery has not occurred: • Whether the risks of ownership have passed to the customer, • Whether we have obtained a fixed commitment to purchase the goods in written documentation from the customer, • Whether the customer requested that the transaction be on a bill and hold basis and we received that request in writing, • Whether the customer has a substantial business purpose for ordering the goods on a bill and hold basis, • Whether there is a fixed schedule for delivery of the product, • Whether we have any specific performance obligations such that the earning process is not complete, • Whether the equipment is segregated from our other inventory and not subject to being used to fill other orders, and • Whether the equipment is complete and ready for shipment. 24 We do not modify our normal billing and credit terms for these types of sales. As of September 30, 2009, we had recognized $0.6 million of sales under bill and hold arrangements. As of September 30, 2008 and 2007, we had no sales under bill and hold arrangements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements See Note 1 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the effect of new accounting pronouncements on our financial statements. Forward-Looking Statements and Assumptions This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein, if any, contain “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “expect”, “plan”, “budget”, “forecast”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “continue” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our future expectations, contain projections of our future results of operations or of our financial position or state other forward-looking information. These forward-looking statements reflect our best judgment about future events and trends based on the information currently available to us. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to predict or control. The factors listed under the caption “Risk Factors”, as well as cautionary language in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position, and actual events and results of operations may vary materially from our current expectations. Management’s Current Outlook and Assumptions Our estimates as to future results and industry trends, to the extent described in this document, are generally based on assumptions regarding the future level of seismic exploration activity, seismic reservoir monitoring projects, demand for offshore cable products and industrial sensors and demand for thermal imaging technologies, and in turn, their effect on the demand and pricing of our products and services. Our analysis of the market and its impact on us is based upon the following assumptions: • Although oil and gas commodity prices have recovered in recent months, we believe the impact of the worldwide financial crisis and continuing recession, combined with volatile and unsteady energy commodity prices will continue to constrain oil and gas exploration activities in North America and also in certain international markets. Furthermore, we believe our seismic customers relying on credit markets as the source of funds for their capital spending are likely to scale back or defer their activities until financial markets stabilize and demand for exploration activities increase. The uncertainty of these global economic matters and their ultimate impact on energy exploration activities and on our customer’s ability to access credit markets may cause demand for our seismic exploration products to remain constrained below the record sales level of $92.6 million that we experienced in fiscal year 2008. • Our Russian and Canadian seismic operations experienced low product demand, excess manufacturing capacity, intense price competition, low rental equipment utilization and certain asset write-downs resulting from these factors. Together, the seismic activities of these subsidiaries generated an operating loss of $3.3 million in fiscal year 2009. We expect these difficult seismic market conditions to continue into fiscal year 2010 and future operating losses are likely in the near-term; however, we believe the operating results of these subsidiaries in fiscal year 2010 will improve from fiscal year 2009. 25 • We believe the impact of political conditions and hostilities around the world, including those of the Middle East, which may have a significant impact on oil and gas commodity prices, will not cause a significant increase or decrease in demand for our seismic products for the foreseeable future. • We expect revenues from our borehole and seabed reservoir characterization products to increase slightly in fiscal year 2010. • We expect recent product introductions, such as our wireless nodal seismic data recording system, to favorably impact our revenues and profits during fiscal year 2010. • Demand for our products used in the thermal solutions industry is expected to increase marginally during fiscal year 2010. • We expect sales of offshore cable and industrial sensor products to increase in fiscal year 2010. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk The following discussion of our exposure to various market risks contains “forward looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. These projected results have been prepared utilizing certain assumptions considered reasonable in light of information currently available to us. Nevertheless, because of the inherent unpredictability of foreign currency rates and interest rates, as well as other factors, actual results could differ materially from those projected in this forward looking information. We do not have any market risk as to market risk sensitive instruments entered into for trading purposes and have only very limited risk as to arrangements entered into for purposes other than trading purposes. Further, we do not engage in commodity or commodity derivative instrument purchasing or selling transactions. Foreign Currency and Operations Risk One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, OYO-GEO Impulse, is located in the Russian Federation. Therefore, our financial results may be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates, weak economic conditions in the Russian Federation or changes in its political climate. Our consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009 reflected approximately $5.0 million of net working capital related to OYO-GEO Impulse. For third-party transactions, OYO-GEO Impulse both receives its income and pays its expenses primarily in rubles. To the extent that transactions of OYO-GEO Impulse are settled in rubles, a devaluation of the ruble versus the U.S. dollar could reduce any contribution from OYO-GEO Impulse to our consolidated results of operations and total comprehensive income as reported in U.S. dollars. We do not hedge the market risk with respect to our operations in the Russian Federation; therefore, such risk is a general and unpredictable risk of future disruptions in the valuation of rubles versus U.S. dollars to the extent such disruptions result in any reduced valuation of OYO-GEO Impulse’s net working capital or future contributions to our consolidated results of operations. At September 30, 2009, the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar to the ruble was 1:30.1. If the U.S. dollar versus ruble exchange rate were to decline by ten percent, our working capital could decline by $0.5 million. Foreign Currency Intercompany Accounts and Notes Receivable From time to time, we provide access to capital to our foreign subsidiaries through U.S. dollar denominated interest bearing promissory notes. Such funds are generally used by our foreign subsidiaries to purchase capital assets and for general working capital needs. In addition, we sell products to our foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollars on trade credit terms. Because these U.S. dollar denominated intercompany debts are accounted for in the local currency of our foreign subsidiaries, any appreciation or devaluation of such foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar will result to our consolidated statement of operations. At September 30, 2009, we had outstanding accounts and notes receivable of $1.4 million and $0.3 million from our subsidiaries in Canada and the Russian Federation, respectively. At September 30, 2009, the foreign exchange in a gain or loss, respectively, 26 rate of the U.S. dollar to the Canadian Dollar was 1:1.1 and the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar to ruble was 1:30.1. If the U.S. dollar exchange rate were to decline by ten percent, our intercompany accounts and notes receivable would decline by $0.1 million in Canada and $30,000 in the Russian Federation. Floating Interest Rate Risk The Credit Agreement and the real estate mortgage agreement for our Pinemont facility each contain a floating interest rate. These floating interest rates subject us to the risk of increased interest costs associated with any upward movements in bank market interest rates. Under the Credit Agreement as most recently amended, our borrowing interest rate is a LIBOR based rate plus 300-400 basis points. As of September 30, 2009, we had no borrowings under the Credit Agreement. Under the real estate mortgage agreement, our borrowing rate is a LIBOR based rate plus 150 basis points and as of September 30, 2009 we had $8.1 million outstanding under this agreement at an effective interest rate of 1.7%. Due to the amount of borrowings outstanding under the real estate mortgage agreement and the potential borrowings available under the Credit Agreement, any increased interest costs associated with movements in market interest rates could be material to our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flow. At September 30, 2009, based on our current level of borrowings, a 1.0% increase in interest rates would increase our interest expense annually by approximately $0.1 million. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Our consolidated financial statements, including the reports thereon, the notes thereto and supplementary data begin at page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can be no assurance that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures will detect or uncover all failures of persons within the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries to report material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company’s reports. In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as of September 30, 2009 of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2009. Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 27 Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, our management concluded that, as of September 30, 2009, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009 has been audited by UHY LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information None. 28 Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant PART III The information required by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Election of Directors”, “Executive Officers and Compensation,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Code of Ethics” and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Executive Officers and Compensation” and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information required by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and is incorporated herein by reference, and in Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters,” contained in Part II hereof. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence The information required by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services The information required by this Item is contained in our definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed in connection with our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Independent Public Accountants” and is incorporated herein by reference. 29 Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV The financial statements and financial statement schedules listed on the accompanying Index to Financial Statements (see page F-1) are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 30 Exhibits Exhibit Number Description of Documents 3.1 (a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. 3.2 (a) Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. 3.3 (p) Amendment No. 1 to OYO Geospace Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws. 4.1 (a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. 4.2 (a) Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. 4.3 (p) Amendment No. 1 to OYO Geospace Corporation Amended and Restated Bylaws. 10.1 (a) Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997, between the Company and Gary D. Owens.* 10.2 (a) Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997, between the Company and Michael J. Sheen.* 10.3 (b) OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan.* 10.4 (c) Amendment No. 1 to OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, dated February 2, 1998.* 10.5 (c) Amendment No. 2 to OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, dated November 16, 1998.* 10.6 (g) Amendment No. 3 to OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, dated November 10, 2000.* 10.7 (g) Amendment No. 4 to OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, dated February 8, 2005.* 10.8 (b) OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Director Plan.* 10.9 (g) Amendment No. 1 to OYO Geospace Corporation 1997 Non-Employee Director Plan, dated February 8, 2005.* 10.10(a) Printhead Purchase Agreement dated November 10, 1995 between the Company and OYO Corporation. 10.11(a) Master Sales Agreement dated November 10, 1995, between the Company and OYO Corporation. 10.12(d) Form of Director Indemnification Agreement. 10.13(f) Business Loan Agreement dated November 22, 2004, made by and between Union Planters Bank, to Regions Bank), and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace N.A. Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP. (predecessor in interest 10.14(h) 10.15(h) First Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of September 19, 2005, between Regions Bank (F/K/ A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP. Promissory Note dated September 19, 2005, made by Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP for the benefit of Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.). 10.16(h) Guaranty Agreement dated September 19, 2005, made by and between the Company and Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.). Each of OYOG, LLC and OYOG Limited Partner, LLC has entered into a Guaranty Agreement with Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) which is substantially identical to the exhibited Guaranty Agreement. 31 Exhibit Number 10.17(h) Description of Documents Security Agreement dated as of September 19, 2005, between Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.), and Concord Technologies, LP. Each of Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP has entered into a Security Agreement with Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) which is substantially identical to the exhibited Security Agreement. 10.18(e) Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Financing Statement, dated September 10, 2003, by and between OYOG Operations, LP and Compass Bank. 10.19(e) Promissory Note dated September 10, 2003, made by OYOG Operations, LP payable to Compass Bank. 10.20(e) Guaranty Agreement dated September 10, 2003, by and between the Company and Compass Bank. 10.21(e) Earnest Money Contract dated May 27, 2003, by and between Cooper Tools, Inc. and OYOG Operations, L.P. 10.22(e) 10.23(e) First Amendment to Earnest Money Contract, dated July 14, 2003, by and between Cooper Tools, Inc. and OYOG Operations, LP. Second Amendment to Earnest Money Contract, dated August 14, 2003, by and between Cooper Tools, Inc. and OYOG Operations, LP. 10.24(e) Third Amendment to Earnest Money Contract, dated August 22, 2003, by and between Cooper Tools, Inc. and OYOG Operations, LP. 10.25(i) OYO Geospace Corporation Fiscal Year 2008 Bonus Plan.* 10.26(j) Second Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of June 16, 2006, between Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP. 10.27(k) Third Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of January 10, 2007, between Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP. 10.28(l) Fourth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of October 12, 2007, between Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP. 10.29(m) Fifth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of March 12, 2008, between Regions Bank (F/K/A Union Planters Bank, N.A.) and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP and OYOG Operations, LP. 10.30(m) Promissory Note dated March 13, 2008, made by OYOG Operations, LP payable to Compass Bank. 10.31(m) Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Financing Statement, dated March 13, 2008, by and between OYOG Operations, LP and Compass Bank. 10.32(m) Guaranty Agreement dated March 13, 2008, by and between the Company and Compass Bank. 10.33(m) Guaranty Agreement dated March 13, 2008, by and between Geospace Technologies, LP and Compass Bank. 10.34(n) OYO Geospace Corporation Fiscal Year 2009 Bonus Plan.* 10.35(n) 10.36(n) First Amendment effective October 1, 2008 to Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997, between the Company and Gary D. Owens.* First Amendment effective October 1, 2008 to Employment Agreement dated as of August 1, 1997, between the Company and Michael J. Sheen.* 32 Exhibit Number 10.37(o) 21.1 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Description of Documents Sixth Amendment to Loan Agreement dated as of April 30, 2009, between Regions Bank (f/k/a Union Planters Bank, N.A.) and Concord Technologies, LP, Geospace Technologies, LP, OYO Instruments, LP, Geospace Engineering Resources International, LP, and OYOG Operations, LP. Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September 30, 1997 (Registration No. 333-36727). Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed November 5, 1997 (Registration No. 333-36727). Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1998. Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed November 18, 1997 (Registration No. 333-36727). Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for September 30, 2003. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for September 30, 2004. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed February 15, 2005. (Registration No. 333-122835) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 21, 2005. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed May 9, 2008. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 3, 2006. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 11, 2007. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 26, 2007. (j) (k) (l) (m) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 17, 2008. (n) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, filed February 6, 2009. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 4, 2009. Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, filed August 3, 2007. This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement. the year ended the year ended (o) (p) * 33 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION By: /s/ GARY D. OWENS Gary D. Owens, Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer December 11, 2009 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /S/ GARY D. OWENS Gary D. Owens /S/ THOMAS T. MCENTIRE Thomas T. McEntire Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Secretary) December 11, 2009 December 11, 2009 /S/ WILLIAM H. MOODY Director December 11, 2009 William H. Moody /S/ TAKASHI KANEMORI Director December 11, 2009 Takashi Kanemori /S/ RICHARD C. WHITE Director December 11, 2009 Richard C. White /S/ MICHAEL J. SHEEN Michael J. Sheen /S/ THOMAS L. DAVIS Thomas L. Davis Director Director December 11, 2009 December 11, 2009 /S/ CHARLES H. STILL Director December 11, 2009 Charles H. Still 34 OYO GEOSPACE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-2 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 F-8 Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-29 F-1 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of OYO Geospace Corporation: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of OYO Geospace Corporation and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of OYO Geospace Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of OYO Geospace Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated December 11, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ UHY LLP Houston, Texas December 11, 2009 F-2 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of OYO Geospace Corporation: We have audited OYO Geospace Corporation and subsidiaries’ (“the Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Part II, Item 9A of this Form 10-K. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, OYO Geospace Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of OYO Geospace Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended September 30, 2009, and our report dated December 11, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. /s/ UHY LLP Houston, Texas December 11, 2009 F-3 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands, except share amounts) AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $848 and $1,329 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current portion of notes receivable, net of allowance of $0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,571 $ 13,878 10,477 57,257 3,326 2,233 1,562 21,546 10,874 64,396 2,931 2,635 Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95,742 103,944 Rental equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patents, net of accumulated amortization of $5,073 and $4,832 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-current deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-current notes receivable, net of allowance of $0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,068 37,105 807 1,843 687 — 1,230 3,014 40,543 1,057 1,843 624 7,146 1,209 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $141,482 $159,380 Current liabilities: LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Book overdrafts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 728 4,692 6,954 367 — 159 35 709 8,210 9,922 962 78 1,553 Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt, net of current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-current deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,900 8,820 1,104 21,469 19,526 1,022 Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,824 42,017 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding . . . . . . . Common stock, $.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 5,994,908 and 5,936,508 shares issued and outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) — — 60 43,300 75,540 (242) 59 42,030 73,780 1,494 Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,658 117,363 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $141,482 $159,380 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-4 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations (In thousands, except share and per share amounts) YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,860 66,287 26,573 14,572 8,062 318 22,952 Gain (loss) on sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (12) Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,609 20,185 Other income (expense): Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign exchange gains (losses) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Earnings per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (602) 809 (414) (91) (298) 3,311 1,551 1,760 0.30 0.29 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 134,495 87,441 $ 138,106 87,587 47,054 50,519 16,913 8,945 1,615 27,473 604 (897) 1,323 (180) (13) 233 20,418 6,266 16,492 7,327 236 24,055 1,655 28,119 (424) 549 30 (37) 118 28,237 8,638 14,152 $ 19,599 2.40 2.31 $ $ 3.38 3.23 Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,950,403 5,908,727 5,793,840 Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,079,378 6,116,039 6,063,446 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-5 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity For the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (In thousands, except share amounts) Balance at September 30, 2006 . . . . . . . . 5,735,208 $ 57 $34,637 $40,029 $ 1,044 $ 75,767 Common Stock Shares Amount Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total Comprehensive income: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Total comprehensive income . . . . . . Excess tax benefit from share—based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of options, net of tax . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . 153,550 — Balance at September 30, 2007 . . . . . . . . 5,888,758 Comprehensive income: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Total comprehensive income . . . . . . Excess tax benefit from share—based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of options, net of tax . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . Short swing profit, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . 47,750 — — — — — — — — 2 — 59 — — — — — 3,083 2,489 211 19,599 — 19,599 — — — — 1,219 — — — 1,219 20,818 3,083 2,491 211 40,420 59,628 2,263 102,370 — — 736 709 33 132 14,152 — 14,152 — — — — — (769) (769) 13,383 — — — — 736 709 33 132 Balance at September 30, 2008 . . . . . . . . 5,936,508 59 $42,030 $73,780 $ 1,494 $117,363 Comprehensive income: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Total comprehensive income . . . . . . Excess tax benefit from share—based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock pursuant to exercise of options, net of tax . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,400 — — — — 1 — — — 147 840 283 1,760 — 1,760 — — — — (1,736) (1,736) 24 147 841 283 — — — Balance at September 30, 2009 . . . . . . . . 5,994,908 $ 60 $43,300 $75,540 $ (242) $118,658 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-6 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) $ 1,760 $ 14,152 $ 19,599 operating activities: Deferred income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bad debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory obsolescence expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . Effects of changes in operating assets and liabilities: Trade accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451 4,943 246 283 318 1,272 (147) 12 14,257 3,238 223 (3,382) (4,201) (550) (1,382) 441 4,320 245 33 1,615 993 (736) (604) (13,690) (15,113) (563) 450 356 (706) 785 (479) 3,230 471 211 236 1,442 (3,083) (1,655) (3,256) (2,340) (895) 1,167 5,637 (7,645) (239) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities . . . . . . . 17,341 (8,022) 12,401 Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (1,709) 736 (9,796) 1,889 (17,007) Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,686) (9,060) (15,118) Cash flows from financing activities: Change in book overdrafts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net borrowings (principal payments) under line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Borrowings under mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal payments under mortgage loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (35) (9,978) — (709) 147 841 35 9,054 8,800 (3,088) 736 842 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities . . . . . . . (9,734) 16,379 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,088 7,009 1,562 (748) (1,451) 3,013 (636) (1,972) — (312) 3,083 2,491 2,654 1,022 959 2,054 Cash and cash equivalents, end of fiscal year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,571 $ 1,562 $ 3,013 The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. F-7 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: The Company OYO Geospace Corporation (“OYO”) designs and manufactures instruments and equipment used in the acquisition and processing of seismic data as well as in the characterization and monitoring of producing oil and gas reservoirs. OYO also manufactures and distributes thermal imaging equipment and dry thermal film products to a variety of markets including the screenprint, point of sale, signage and textile markets. As of September 30, 2009, OYO Corporation U.S.A. (“OYO USA”) owned approximately 21.5% of OYO’s common stock. OYO USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of OYO Corporation, a Japanese corporation (“OYO Japan”). OYO and its subsidiaries are referred to collectively as the “Company”. The significant accounting policies followed by the Company are summarized below. Basis of Presentation The accompanying financial statements present the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Reclassifications Certain amounts previously presented in the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company considers many factors in selecting appropriate operational and financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of these financial statements. The Company continually evaluates its estimates, including those related to bad debt reserves, inventory obsolescence reserves, self-insurance reserves, product warranty reserves, long-lived assets, intangible assets and deferred income tax assets. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different conditions or assumptions. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts that, at times, exceed federally insured limits. Management of the Company believes that the financial strength of the financial institutions holding such deposits minimizes the credit risk of such deposits. The Company sells products to customers throughout the United States and various foreign countries. The Company’s normal credit terms for trade receivables are 30 days. In certain situations, credit terms may be extended to 60 days or longer. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally F-8 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) does not require collateral for its trade receivables. Additionally, the Company provides long-term financing in the form of promissory notes when competitive conditions require such financing. In such cases, the Company may require collateral. Allowances are recognized for potential credit losses. At September 30, 2009, the Company had two customers comprising 16.6% and 11.2%, respectively, of the Company’s trade accounts receivable. At September 30, 2008, the Company had no customers that made up 10% or more of the Company’s trade accounts receivable. The Company had two customers comprising 72.8% and 25.6% of its notes receivable balance at September 30, 2009. The Company had two customers comprising 49.8% and 39.8%, respectively, of its notes receivable balance at September 30, 2008. One customer comprised 12.0%, 11.5% and 12.6% of the Company’s revenues during the fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company has a subsidiary located in the Russian Federation. Therefore, the Company’s financial results may be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates, weak economic conditions or changes in political climate within the Russian Federation. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2009 reflected approximately $5.0 million of net working capital related to this subsidiary. This subsidiary receives a substantial portion of its revenues and pays its expenses primarily in rubles. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, this subsidiary received approximately $1.1 million of its income in U.S. dollars as a result of intercompany sales to the Company’s subsidiary located in the United States. The Company’s consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2008 reflected approximately $7.1 million of net working capital related to this subsidiary. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, this subsidiary received approximately $8.4 million of its income in U.S. dollars as a result of intercompany sales to the Company’s subsidiary located in the United States. To the extent that transactions of this subsidiary are settled in rubles, a devaluation of the ruble versus the United States dollar could reduce any contribution from this subsidiary to its consolidated results of operations as reported in U.S. dollars. The Company does not hedge the market risk with respect to its operations in the Russian Federation; therefore, such risk is a general and unpredictable risk of future disruptions in the valuation of rubles versus U.S. dollars to the extent such disruptions result in any reduced valuation of the subsidiary’s net working capital or future contributions to its consolidated results of operations. Inventories The Company records a write-down of its inventories when the cost basis of any manufactured product, including any estimated future costs to complete the manufacturing process, exceeds its net realizable value. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (as determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market value. The Company’s subsidiary in the Russian Federation uses an average cost method to value its inventories. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets Prepaid expenses and other current assets include prepayments for insurance, inventory purchases, manufacturing supplies and other types of current assets. Property, Plant and Equipment and Rental Equipment Property, plant and equipment and rental equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation expense is calculated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Rental equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment: Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Years 3-5 3-15 10-50 5-10 F-9 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance expenditures are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss thereon is reflected in the statement of operations. Patents Patents are amortized over the legal life of the patent or the estimated useful life of the patent, whichever is shorter. Intellectual property was being amortized using the straight-line method over five years. Patent amortization expense was approximately $0.2 million during each of fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007. Intellectual property amortization expense for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 was approximately zero, zero, and $0.2 million, respectively. Patent amortization expense is estimated to be approximately $0.2 million for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Impairment of Long-lived Assets The Company’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable. The impairment review, if necessary, includes a comparison of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by an asset group with the associated carrying value of the related assets. If the carrying value of the asset group exceeds the expected future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of the asset group exceeds its fair value. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of purchased businesses over the estimated fair value of the acquired business’ net assets. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company has elected to make September 30 the annual impairment assessment date and will perform additional impairment tests if a change in circumstances occurs that would indicate the carrying value of goodwill may exceed its fair amount. The assessment is performed in two steps: step one is to compare the carrying value of the reporting unit’s net assets (including goodwill) to its respective fair value for potential impairment and if potential losses are identified, step two is to measure the impairment loss. Step two involves allocating the calculated fair value to all of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the reporting unit as if the calculated fair value was the purchase price of the business combination. The fair value measurement framework defines fair value and establishes a methodology for measuring fair value. Under the fair value measurement framework and the lack of quoted prices for identical items or an independent market analysis, management estimates the fair market value based on Level 3 inputs using an income based approach. The goodwill impairment is tested at the Company’s seismic segment level as the goodwill relates to the purchase of a seismic related company. The impairment test uses a weighted average cost of capital. The growth rate is based on the projected inflation rate. The Company performed step one at September 30, 2009 and 2008 and found that there were no impairments at those times; thus, step two was not necessary. Revenue Recognition The Company primarily derives revenue from the sale, and short-term rental under operating leases, of seismic instruments and equipment and thermal solutions products. The Company generally recognizes sales revenues when its products are shipped and title and risk of loss have passed to the customer. The Company recognizes rental revenues as earned over the rental period. Rentals of the Company’s equipment generally range from daily rentals to rental periods of up to nine months or longer. Except for certain of the Company’s reservoir characterization products, its products are generally sold without any customer acceptance provisions and its F-10 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) standard terms of sale do not allow customers to return products for credit. In instances where the customer requires a significant performance test for the Company’s new and unproven products, the Company does not recognize the revenue attributable to the product as to which the performance test applies until the performance test is satisfied. Collection of revenue from the sale of large-scale reservoir characterization products may occur at various stages of production or after delivery of the product, and the collected funds are not refundable to the customer. Most of the Company’s products do not require installation assistance or sophisticated instruction. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. The Company operates under a purchase order/contract system for goods sold to customers, and under rental/lease agreements for equipment rentals. These documents evidence that an arrangement exists. • Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For product sales, the Company does not recognize revenues until delivery has occurred or performance measures are met. For rental revenue, the Company recognizes revenue when earned. • The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable. Sales prices are defined in writing in a customer’s purchase order, purchase contract or equipment rental agreement. • Collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company evaluates customer credit to ensure that collectibility of revenue is reasonably assured. Occasionally seismic customers are not able to take immediate delivery of products which were specifically manufactured to the customer’s specifications. These occasions generally occur when customers face logistical issues such as project delays or delays with their seismic crew deployment. In these instances, customers have asked the Company to hold the equipment for a short period of time until they can take physical delivery of the product (referred to as “bill and hold” arrangements). The Company considers the following criteria for recognizing revenue when delivery has not occurred: • Whether the risks of ownership have passed to the customer, • Whether we have obtained a fixed commitment to purchase the goods in written documentation from the customer, • Whether the customer requested that the transaction be on a bill and hold basis and the Company received that request in writing, • Whether the customer has a substantial business purpose for ordering the goods on a bill and hold basis, • Whether there is a fixed schedule for delivery of the product, • Whether the Company has any specific performance obligations such that the earning process is not complete, • Whether the equipment is segregated from its other inventory and not subject to being used to fill other orders, and • Whether the equipment is complete and ready for shipment. The Company does not modify its normal billing and credit terms for these types of sales. As of September 30, 2009, there were $0.6 million of sales under bill and hold arrangements. As of September 30, 2008 and 2007, there were no sales under bill and hold arrangements. F-11 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Deferred Revenue The Company records deferred revenue when funds are received prior to the recognition of the associated revenue. Research and Development Costs The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs include salaries, employee benefit costs, department supplies, direct project costs and other related costs. Product Warranties The Company offers a standard product warranty obligating it to repair or replace products with manufacturing defects. The Company maintains a reserve for future warranty costs based on historical experience or, in the absence of historical product experience, management’s estimates. Changes in the warranty reserve are contained in the following table (in thousands): Balance at the beginning of the period (October 1, 2007) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accruals for warranties issued during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) . . . . . Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at the end of the period (September 30, 2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accruals for warranties issued during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) . . . . . Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,111 1,745 — (1,709) 1,147 1,400 — (1,715) Balance at the end of the period (September 30, 2009) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 832 Stock-Based Compensation Under the FASB share-based payment framework, the Company expenses the grant date fair value of equity awards over the requisite service period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to value its new stock option grants. The share-based payment framework also requires the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense related to stock-based compensation. In addition, the share-based payment framework requires the Company to reflect the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash inflow. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expenses of $0.3 million, $33,000 and $0.2 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were 146,000 stock options granted during fiscal year 2009 and no options granted during fiscal years 2008 and 2007. The fair value of options granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following data: Dividend yield rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected option term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009 0% 2.1% 51.4% 6.25 years F-12 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The computation of expected volatility was based on the historical volatility. Historical volatility was calculated from historical data for the time approximately equal to the expected term of the option award starting from the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the period corresponding with the expected life of the option. Financial Instruments Fair value estimates are made at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates may be subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The Company believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable and accounts payable, approximate the fair values of such items as a result of the relative short term nature of such items. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates the fair value as a result of the interest rates reflecting market rates of interest. Foreign Currency Gains and Losses The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Results of operations have been translated using the average exchange rates during the year. Resulting translation adjustments have been recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the statement of operations as they occur. Shipping and Handling Costs Amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to reimbursable shipping and handling costs are included in revenues and the associated costs incurred by the Company for reimbursable shipping and handling costs are reported in cost of sales. The Company had shipping and handling costs of $0.6 million, $0.8 million and $0.7 million for each of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Income Taxes Management makes judgments regarding the interpretation of tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and causes changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions as well as by the Internal Revenue Service. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all open tax years. The potential outcomes of examinations are regularly assessed in determining the adequacy of the provision for income taxes and income tax liabilities. Management believes that adequate provisions have been made for reasonable and foreseeable outcomes related to uncertain tax matters. Income taxes are presented in accordance with FASB standard for accounting for income taxes, as interpreted by the FASB interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carrybacks and carryforwards are recorded. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities (temporary differences) and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary. F-13 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Subsequent Events The Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The Company evaluated such events and transactions through December 11, 2009 when the financial statements were filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a standard on the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments. This standard changed the method for determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists for debt securities and the amount of the impairment to be recorded in earnings. This standard was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In April 2009, the FASB issued a standard on interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. This standard requires fair value disclosures in both interim as well as annual financial statements in order to provide more timely information about the effects of current market conditions on financial instruments. This standard was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In May 2009, the FASB issued a standard on subsequent events. This standard requires companies to recognize in their financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. An entity shall disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued. Companies are not permitted to recognize subsequent events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after the balance sheet date and before financial statements are issued. Some non-recognized subsequent events must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading. For such events a company must disclose the nature of the event, an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. This statement applies prospectively for interim and annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In June 2009, the FASB issued a standard on the FASB accounting standards codification and the hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard stipulates the FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. This standard was effective for financials statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. F-14 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) 2. Inventories: Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands): Finished goods and sub-assemblies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Obsolescence reserve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 $15,783 8,598 37,489 (4,613) $14,968 17,883 35,484 (3,939) $57,257 $64,396 Inventory obsolescence expense was approximately $1.4 million, $1.0 million and $1.4 million during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. 3. Accounts and Notes Receivable: The Company’s current trade accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands): AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 Trade accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14,726 (848) $22,875 (1,329) $13,878 $21,546 The allowance for doubtful accounts represents the Company’s best estimate of probable credit losses. The Company determines the allowance based upon historical experience and a review of its balances. Accounts receivable balances are charged off against the allowance whenever it is probable that the receivable will not be recoverable. The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s current notes receivable were $10.5 million and $10.9 million, respectively. The Company also had notes receivable of zero and $7.1 million classified as long-term at September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Notes receivable are generally collateralized by the products sold, and bear interest at rates ranging up to 11.3% per year. The Company had a reserve for doubtful notes of zero at September 30, 2009 and 2008. The notes receivable of $10.5 million at September 30, 2009 will mature at various times through September 2010. The Company has, on occasion, extended or renewed notes receivable as they mature, but there is no obligation to do so. 4. Rental Equipment: Rental equipment consisted of the following (in thousands): AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 Rental equipment, primarily geophones and related products . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,172 (10,104) $12,599 (9,585) $ 4,068 $ 3,014 F-15 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Rental equipment depreciation expense was $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. 5. Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands): AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 Land and land improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Machinery and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transportation equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tools and molds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,140 23,789 30,990 985 35 213 2,793 $ 3,179 23,636 29,195 975 37 158 4,627 Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,945 (24,840) 61,807 (21,264) $ 37,105 $ 40,543 Property, plant and equipment depreciation expense was $4.1 million, $3.8 million and $2.8 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. 6. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt: Notes payable and long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands): Mortgage note payable, due in monthly installments of $31 with interest at 7.0% through January 2014, collateralized by certain land and building having a net book value of $3.8 million . . . . . . Mortgage note payable, original mortgage was refinanced in March 2008 and is due in monthly installments of $37 with interest at LIBOR plus 150 basis points through February 2028, with remaining principal and interest due March 2028, collateralized by certain land and building having a net book value of $13.7 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Working capital line of credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 $1,408 $ 1,676 8,140 — 9,548 (728) 8,580 9,979 20,235 (709) $8,820 $19,526 On November 22, 2004, several of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement (the “Original Credit Agreement”) with a bank. The Original Credit Agreement has been amended periodically since 2004, and most recently on April 30, 2009 (as so amended, the “Credit Agreement”). Under the Credit F-16 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Agreement, the Company’s borrower subsidiaries can borrow up to $25.0 million principally secured by their accounts receivable, inventories and equipment. The Credit Agreement expires on April 30, 2011. The Credit Agreement limits the incurrence of additional indebtedness, requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, restricts the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends and contains other covenants customary in agreements of this type. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants. The interest rate for borrowings under the Credit Agreement is a LIBOR based rate with a margin spread of 300-400 basis points depending upon the maintenance of certain ratios. At September 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreement, standby letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $0.9 million and additional borrowings available of $15.9 million. On March 13, 2008, the Company obtained an $8.8 million mortgage from a bank. The proceeds were used to pay off the existing $2.6 million mortgage on the Pinemont facility and to repay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement. The mortgage is collateralized by the Pinemont property and buildings. The mortgage interest rate is a floating rate based on LIBOR plus 150 basis points, or 1.7% at September 30, 2009. The Company’s long-term debt will mature as follows (in thousands): YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 728 749 771 795 565 5,940 $9,548 7. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities: Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands): AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 Employee bonuses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Product warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensated absences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal and professional fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Payroll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Medical claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — 832 917 725 1,111 1,678 458 1,233 $3,079 1,147 959 680 1,251 1,575 257 974 $6,954 $9,922 The Company is self-insured for certain losses related to employee medical claims. The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage for individual claims in excess of $150,000 per claimant per year in order to limit its exposure to any significant levels of employee medical claims. Self-insured losses are accrued based on the Company’s historical experience and on estimates of aggregate liability for uninsured claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry. F-17 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) 8. Employee Benefits: The Company’s employees are participants in the OYO Geospace Corporation Employee’s 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), which covers substantially all eligible employees in the United States. The Plan is a qualified salary reduction plan in which all eligible participants may elect to have a percentage of their compensation contributed to the Plan, subject to certain guidelines issued by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company’s share of discretionary matching contributions was approximately $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company’s stock incentive plans in which employees may participate are discussed in Note 9 to these Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company’s employees are also participants in the OYO Geospace Corporation Fiscal Year 2009 Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”). Every employee of the Company is eligible to participate in Tier I of the Bonus Plan except for its employees in the Russian Federation, who participate in a local plan. Under Tier I, employees share proportionally in the Company’s profit based on each employee’s relative payroll. The Tier I bonus pool is established by accruing 18% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) above a specified range. Selected employees are eligible to participate in Tier II of the Bonus Plan, which applies after Tier I is fully funded. The Tier II Bonus pool is established by accruing 18% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) within a specified range. Under Tier II, participants share in the bonus pool based on their respective working groups meeting predefined goals. Senior executive officers are eligible to participate in Tier III, which only applies after the Tier I and Tier II pools have been fully funded. The Tier III bonus pool is established by accruing 18% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) within a specified range above the Tier I and II ranges. The Company recorded bonus expense of zero, $3.1 million and $3.2 million for the fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. 9. Stockholders’ Equity: In September 1997, the board of directors and stockholders approved the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Employee Plan”), and, following amendments thereto, there has been reserved an aggregate of 1,125,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. In November 1997, the board of directors and stockholders approved the Company’s 1997 Non-Employee Director Plan (the “Director Plan”) and following an amendment thereto, there has been reserved an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. At September 30, 2009, the shares of common stock available for grant under the Employee Plan and Director Plan were 153,175 and 45,721, respectively. Under the Employee Plan, the Company is authorized to grant nonqualified and incentive stock options to purchase common stock and restricted stock awards of common stock to key employees of the Company. Options have a term not to exceed ten years, with the exception of incentive stock options granted to employees owning ten percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, which have a term not to exceed five years. The exercise price of any option may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. In the case of incentive stock options granted to an employee owning ten percent or more of the outstanding shares of common stock, the exercise price of such option may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options vest over a four-year period commencing on the date of grant in 25% annual increments. Under the Employee Plan, the Company may issue shares of restricted stock to employees for no payment by the employee or for a payment below the fair market value on the date of grant. The restricted stock is subject to certain restrictions described in the Employee Plan, with no restrictions continuing for more than ten years from the date of the award. F-18 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The Company has not issued any shares of restricted stock under the Employee Plan since August 1, 2001. All issued shares of restricted stock are fully vested; thus there are no outstanding shares of restricted stock. The prior issuances by the Company of restricted stock were recorded at the fair value of the stock subject to those awards and were recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity, with a credit to additional paid-in capital. The Company recorded compensation expense based on the vesting criteria of the individual awards. The Company will account for future issuances of restricted stock awards in accordance with applicable guidelines, which require that stock-based awards be measured and recognized at fair value. The Company established the Director Plan pursuant to which options to purchase shares of common stock are granted annually to non-employee directors and pursuant to which a portion of the annual fees paid for the services of such non-employee directors is payable in shares of common stock based on the fair market value thereof at the date of grant. However, as disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, on February 21, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a new compensation structure for non-employee directors, as recommended by the Board of Director’s Compensation Committee. Pursuant to an amendment to the Director Plan adopted at the same meeting, the annual options to non-employee directors will no longer be granted. Options granted under the Director Plan prior to the adoption of this amendment have a term of ten years. The exercise price of each option granted is the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Options vest over a one-year period commencing on the date of grant. Effective November 5, 1999, the board of directors approved the OYO Geospace Corporation 1999 Broad- Based Option Plan (the “Broad-Based Plan”) and reserved an aggregate of 50,000 shares for issuance thereunder. Under the Broad-Based Plan, the Company is authorized to issue to all employees (except executive officers and employee directors) nonqualified stock options to purchase common stock of the Company. These options have a term not to exceed ten years. The exercise price of any broad-based option may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. These options vest over a one-year period commencing on the date of grant. There were 18,900 shares available for grant under this plan at September 30, 2009. A summary of the activity with respect to stock options is as follows: Outstanding at September 30, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding at September 30, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding at September 30, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 586,650 — (153,550) (4,600) — 428,500 — (47,750) — — 380,750 146,000 (58,400) (100) — Outstanding at September 30, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468,250 F-19 Weighted Average Exercise Price 14.10 — 16.21 42.33 — 13.04 — 14.88 — — 12.81 17.56 14.39 11.25 — 14.10 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The number of stock options vested during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 were 2,000, 2,750 and 66,225, respectively. The fair values of stock options vested during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $29,000, $37,000 and $0.7 million, respectively. The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2009: Range of Exercise Prices $ 6.81 to $13.49 . . . . . . . . . . . $13.50 to $19.99 . . . . . . . . . . $20.00 to $53.95 . . . . . . . . . . Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Weighted Average Remaining Term (in years) 3.5 5.7 5.7 4.8 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 7.38 17.44 39.04 Shares 188,550 118,300 14,150 14.10 321,000 Weighted Average Remaining Term (in years) 3.5 1.2 5.7 2.7 Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 7.38 17.29 40.02 12.47 Shares 188,550 264,300 15,400 468,250 Based on the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 2009 of $25.83, the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding was $5.7 million. At September 30, 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options currently exercisable was $4.3 million. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $0.5 million, $2.2 million and $8.4 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2009 total unvested compensation expense associated with stock options amounted to $1.1 million and will be recognized over the next three fiscal years. There were no shares issued to the Company’s outside directors during fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The weighted average fair values per share of stock-based award grants were as follows: Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director’s common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 $17.56 — 2008 $— — 2007 $— — 10. Income Taxes: Components of income before income taxes were as follows (in thousands): United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,910 (3,599) $15,870 4,548 $21,814 6,423 $ 3,311 $20,418 $28,237 YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 F-20 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands): Current: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 958 47 95 $4,672 1,003 150 $6,878 2,097 142 YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 Deferred: Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,100 5,825 9,117 1,303 (852) 451 313 128 441 (235) (244) (479) $1,551 $6,266 $8,638 Actual income tax expense (benefit) differs from income tax expense computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate of 34%, 35% and 34% for fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, as follows (in thousands): Provision for U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate . . . . . . Effect of foreign income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Extraterritorial income exclusion benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturers’/producers’ deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Research and experimentation tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit . . . . . . . Nondeductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution of prior years’ tax matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contingency for uncertainty in income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 $1,126 415 — (89) (181) 61 92 (45) 49 123 $7,146 (461) — (293) (324) 84 246 (34) (148) 50 $9,601 (409) (294) (77) (281) 94 128 (29) — (95) $1,551 $6,266 $8,638 46.8% 30.7% 30.6% F-21 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) Deferred income taxes under the liability method reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s net deferred income tax asset were as follows (in thousands): Deferred income tax assets: Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capitalized research and development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating loss carryforwards, tax credits and deferrals . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued product warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued compensated absences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Insurance and other reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 $ 241 2,564 1,028 435 111 252 337 280 304 125 46 5,723 $ 440 1,711 1,409 137 201 3 248 369 324 — 85 4,927 Deferred income tax liabilities: Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (109) (2,705) — (78) (1,624) (770) Net deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,909 $ 2,455 The Company has net operating losses in the Russian and Canadian subsidiaries that can be carried forward six and twenty years, respectively. Deferred income taxes are reported as follows in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet (in thousands): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current deferred income tax asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent deferred income tax asset Current deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noncurrent deferred income tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 $ 3,326 687 — (1,104) $ 2,931 624 (78) (1,022) $ 2,909 $ 2,455 Under the liability method, a valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on the Company’s expectation that the deductible temporary differences will reverse during periods in which the Company generates net taxable income or during periods in which losses can be carried back to offset prior year taxes, management believes that the Company will realize the benefit of its net deferred income tax asset. F-22 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The financial reporting bases of investments in foreign subsidiaries exceed their tax bases. A deferred tax liability is not recorded for this temporary difference because the investment is essentially permanent. A reversal of the Company’s plans to permanently invest in these foreign operations would cause the excess to become taxable. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, the temporary difference related to undistributed earnings for which no deferred taxes have been provided was approximately $14.3 million and $17.2 million, respectively. The Company will need to reassess and reassert its ability and intent to indefinitely reinvest the remaining foreign earnings in order to continue the application of the exception under FASB guidelines. From time to time the Company is the subject of audits by various tax authorities that can result in claims and assessments and additional tax payments, penalties and interest. The United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) is in the process of conducting an audit of the Company’s fiscal year 2007 U.S. Federal income tax return. The IRS has requested records and is in the process of examining such records. The Company does not believe the outcome of the IRS audit will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Effective October 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASB standard for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. At the time of adoption, the uncertain tax position did not materially differ from the Company’s liability of $43,520. The amount of unrecognized tax liability with respect to the Company’s uncertain tax positions increased based on activities during the fiscal year. The Company classifies interest and penalties associated with the payment of income taxes in the Other Income (Expense) section of its consolidated statement of operations. Tax return filings, which are subject to review by local tax authorities by major jurisdiction, are as follows: • United States—fiscal years ended September 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 • State of Texas—fiscal years ended September 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 • Russian Federation—calendar years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 • Canada—fiscal years ended September 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 The following table is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning and end of fiscal year 2009 (in thousands): Balance at October 1, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lapse of statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at September 30, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lapse of statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 44 115 40 (7) 192 26 23 — Balance at September 30, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $241 The unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Company’s effective tax rate in future periods if they are favorably resolved. Management believes that adequate provisions for income taxes have been reflected in the financial statements and is not aware of any significant exposure items that have not been reflected in the financial statements. Amounts considered probable of settlement within one year have been included in the accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. F-23 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) 11. Earnings Per Common Share: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is determined on the assumption that outstanding dilutive stock options have been exercised and the aggregate proceeds as defined were used to reacquire common stock using the average price of such common stock for the period. The following table summarizes the calculation of weighted average common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding for purposes of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts): Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents: YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 $ 1,760 $ 14,152 $ 19,599 Common shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Common share equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,950,403 128,975 5,908,727 207,312 5,793,840 269,606 Total weighted average common shares and common share equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,079,378 6,116,039 6,063,446 Earnings per share: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ 0.30 0.29 $ $ 2.40 2.31 $ $ 3.38 3.23 Options totaling 13,200, 9,450 and zero shares of common stock in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively, were not included in the calculation of weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share because their effects were antidilutive. 12. Related Party Transactions: Sales to OYO Japan and other affiliated companies were approximately $1.1 million, $0.8 million and $0.5 million during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Purchases of inventory from OYO Japan and other affiliated companies were approximately $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $4,000 during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. 13. Commitments and Contingencies: Operating Leases The Company leases certain equipment under short-term cancelable operating leases; therefore the Company does not have future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases. Rent expense was approximately $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Legal Proceedings From time to time the Company is a party to what it believes is routine litigation and proceedings that may be considered as part of the ordinary course of its business. Legal expenses related to such matters are expensed as incurred. F-24 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) On July 8, 2009, the Company received a complaint filed in the United States District Court in Nevada alleging that the Geospace Seismic Recorder (“GSR”), the Company’s newly developed wireless data acquisition system, infringes upon a patent held by Ascend Geo, LLC (“Ascend”). The Company requested and was granted a change in venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Houston (the “Court”). In addition to monetary damages, Ascend requested a preliminary injunction against future sales by the Company of the GSR nodal system. The Company filed its response with the Court requesting that it deny Ascend’s request for a preliminary injunction and, on November 4, 2009, the Court denied Ascend’s request for a preliminary injunction. The Company strongly believes that the GSR nodal system does not violate Ascend’s patent. The Company also believes that Ascend’s patent is not valid and the Company has petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to re-examine its validity. On November 12, 2009, the PTO found that substantial new questions of patentability were raised by the petition as to each of the claims of the Ascend patent and issued an office action rejecting each of the claims based on prior art that the Company submitted to the PTO. Based on the PTO’s initial finding of invalidity of Ascend’s patent claims, the Company has petitioned the Houston Court to stay the litigation until the PTO can complete its reexamination of Ascend’s patent. Ascend failed to timely oppose the motion to stay the proceedings, and the matter is now before the court. Ascend has the right to respond to the PTO office action no later than January 12, 2010. The Company will continue to defend vigorously its right to build and sell its GSR products and based on developments to date, the Company is optimistic that the matter will be resolved satisfactorily in its favor. At this time, however, the Company is unable to predict the outcome of its dispute regarding Ascend’s patent or Ascend’s claims. 14. Supplemental Cash Flow Information: Supplemental cash flow information is as follows (in thousands): YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 Cash paid for: Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 336 4,121 $ 868 5,257 $ 248 4,634 Noncash investing and financing activities: Accrued capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 — 404 15. Segment and Geographic Information: lines currently consist of geophones and hydrophones, The Company evaluates financial performance based on two business segments: Seismic and Thermal Solutions. The Seismic product including multi- component geophones and hydrophones, seismic leader wire, geophone string connectors, seismic telemetry cables, high definition reservoir characterization products and services, marine seismic cable retrieval devices, data acquisition systems, offshore cables and industrial products. Thermal Solutions products include thermal printers, thermal printheads and dry thermal film and other media. The Company markets these products to a variety of markets, including the screen print, point of sale, signage and textile markets. The Company also sells these Thermal Solutions products to its seismic customers. F-25 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The following tables summarize the Company’s segment information: YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 Net sales: Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thermal Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $79,043 13,028 789 $118,612 15,201 682 $122,450 15,312 344 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92,860 134,495 138,106 Income (loss) from operations: Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thermal Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,591 370 (7,352) Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,609 27,078 1,283 (8,176) 20,185 35,873 617 (8,371) 28,119 Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation: Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thermal Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,610 598 1,264 5,472 Interest income: Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thermal Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense: Seismic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thermal Solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Corporate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 8 — 809 495 — 107 602 2,913 576 1,109 4,598 1,280 43 — 1,323 772 — 125 897 2,048 583 1,281 3,912 397 28 124 549 282 — 142 424 * The Company combined the manufacturing operations for its Seismic and Thermal Solutions business segments. While the combination of the two segments resulted in more streamlined operations, the Company no longer segregates and reports certain balance sheet accounts for these segments. As a result, the Company has discontinued the reporting of business segment balance sheet information. “Corporate” net sales consists of rental revenue earned from an operating lease of a surplus building located in Houston, Texas. “Corporate” loss from operations primarily consists of the Company’s Houston headquarter general and administrative expenses. F-26 The Company has operations in the United States, Canada, the Russian Federation and the United Kingdom. Sales information for the Company is as follows (in thousands): United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russian Federation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eliminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 $87,371 3,526 4,152 2,835 (5,024) $120,448 7,691 18,350 4,340 (16,334) $119,765 13,887 15,023 4,536 (15,105) $92,860 $134,495 $138,106 Summaries of net sales by geographic area for fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands): Asia (excluding Japan and Middle East) . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Japan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Middle East . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 $ 9,114 10,730 16,357 971 14,236 40,254 1,198 $ 2008 8,537 18,088 41,451 1,329 6,915 54,648 3,527 2007 $ 18,872 28,428 19,770 804 20,068 45,187 4,977 $92,860 $134,495 $138,106 Net sales are attributed to countries based on the ultimate destination of the product sold, if known. If the ultimate destination is not known, net sales are attributed to countries based on the geographic location of the initial shipment. Long-lived assets were as follows (in thousands): United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russian Federation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 2008 2007 $33,447 5,966 5,115 517 8 $45,053 $42,592 5,499 6,281 431 8 $54,811 $38,801 2,127 5,509 515 6 $46,958 16. Disclosures about Fair Value: The Company follows the FASB standard for fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. F-27 OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued) The fair value standard establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the measurement. The three levels are defined as follows: Level 1—Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. Level 2—Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly such as quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 3—Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which the Company makes its own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets and liabilities. The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value (in thousands): Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — $1,843 $1,843 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 17. Selected Quarterly Information (Unaudited): The following table represents summarized data for each of the quarters in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except per share amounts): Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009 Fourth Quarter $22,705 4,336 (1,928) 10 (1,816) $ (0.30) Third Quarter $20,790 7,075 1,209 91 1,007 0.17 $ Second Quarter $23,510 7,142 1,756 93 1,232 0.21 $ First Quarter $25,855 8,020 2,572 (492) 1,337 0.23 $ Diluted earnings (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.30) $ 0.17 $ 0.20 $ 0.22 Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2008 Fourth Quarter Third Quarter $30,484 11,385 4,672 (29) 3,300 0.56 $ $35,590 14,149 6,227 (2) 4,334 0.73 $ Second Quarter $36,399 10,406 4,472 194 3,207 0.54 $ First Quarter $32,022 11,114 4,814 70 3,311 0.56 $ Diluted earnings per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0.54 $ 0.71 $ 0.53 $ 0.54 F-28 Schedule II OYO Geospace Corporation and Subsidiaries Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (In Thousands) Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs And Expenses Charged to Other Assets (Deductions) And Additions Balance at End of Period Year ended September 30, 2009 Allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,329 $ 318 $— $ (799) $ 848 Year ended September 30, 2008 Allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,027 $1,615 $— $(1,313) $1,329 Year ended September 30, 2007 Allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts and notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 757 236 — 34 1,027 F-29 w w w . o y o g e o s p a c e . c o m Corporate Headquarters and operating Facility OYO Geospace Corporation 7007 Pinemont Drive Houston, Texas 77040 (713) 986-4444 Geospace technologies (713) 939-7093 Geospace offshore (713) 939-7093 oYo Instruments (713) 986-4444 Geospace engineering Resources International (713) 986-4444 oYo-Geo Impulse International llC Kirovogradskaya, 36, Ufa, Bashkortostan, Russia 450001 (7) 3472 25 3973 oYo Geo Space Canada, Inc. 2735-37 Avenue, N.E. Calgary, Alberta, Canada T1Y 5R8 (403) 250-9600 w w w . o y o g s c a n a d a . c o m oYo Geospace China Room 700, 7th Floor, Lido Office Tower Lido Place Jichang Road Beijing 100004, P. R. China 86 10 64378768 oYo Instruments, europe ltd. F3 Bramingham Business Park Enterprise Way, Luton, Bedfordshire LU3 4BU, England 44 (0) 1582 573 980 w w w . o y o . c o . u k w w w . o y o g e o s p a c e . c o m [ Transforming Technology Since 1980, OYO Geospace has successfully designed, manufactured and deployed a broad spectrum of seismic instrumentation solutions and accessories for the oil and gas industry worldwide. In 1995 we began serving the thermal solutions market, designing and manufacturing imaging equipment and film components that are used in high-value, high-potential commercial graphic applications worldwide. OYO Geospace is headquartered in Houston, Texas. Our international sales locations include Canada, China, Russia and the United Kingdom with international manufacturing facilities strategically located in Canada and Russia.