GMS
Annual Report 2021

Loading PDF...

More annual reports from GMS:

2023 Report
2022 Report
2021 Report
2020 Report
2019 Report

Share your feedback:


Plain-text annual report

G U L F M A R I N E S E R V I C E S P L C A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 2 1 Gulf Marine Services PLC Annual Report 2021 HIGHLIGHTS In this report Strategic Report Highlights 2021 Financial Highlights 2021 Operational Highlights 2022 Highlights and Outlook Non-Financial Information Statement Chairman’s Review People and Values Business Model & Strategic Objectives Section 172 Statement Market Analysis Risk Management Key Performance Indicators Financial Review Long-term Viability Statement Governance Chairman’s Introduction Board of Directors Report of the Board Audit and Risk Committee Report Nomination Committee Report Remuneration Committee Report IFC IFC 1 1 1 2 4 18 22 26 28 34 36 38 40 42 44 49 53 56 Directors’ Remuneration Policy Report 58 Annual Report on Remuneration Directors’ Report Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities Financial Statements Independent Auditor’s Report Group Consolidated Financial Statements Company Financial Statements Glossary Other Definitions Corporate Information 66 74 79 80 90 139 151 153 155 Also online at https://www.gmsplc.com/Results-and- Presentations.aspx Our vision To be the best SESV operator in the world 2021 Overview Revenue US$ 115.1m (2020: US$ 102.5m) Adjusted EBITDA US$ 64.1m (2020: US$ 50.4m) Net profit for the year US$ 31.2m (2020: net loss of US$ 124.3m) Utilisation 84% (2020: 81%) General and administrative expenses US$ 12.3m (2020: US$ 18.2m) 2021 Financial Highlights — Revenue increased by 12.3% to US$ 115.1 million (2020: US$ 102.5 million) driven by increased utilisation in higher earning E- and S-Class vessels as detailed below. — Increased adjusted EBITDA1 to US$ 64.1 million (2020: US$ 50.4 million) and an improvement to adjusted EBITDA margin to 56% (2020: 49%). — Cost of sales excluding depreciation, amortisation and the reversal of impairment/impairment charge was US$ 41.2 million (2020: US$ 42.3 million) reflecting higher vessel utilisation. — General and administrative expenses decreased to US$ 12.3 million (2020: US$ 18.2 million) as a result of US$ 5.6 million of non-recurring costs incurred in prior year (2021: nil). — US$ 15.0 million reversal of prior year’s impairment compared to an impairment charge of US$ 87.2 million in 2020, reflecting Group’s improved long-term outlook. — First reported net profit since 2016 at US$ 31.2 million (2020: net loss of US$ 124.3 million). Adjusted net profit2 of US$ 18.0 million (2020: adjusted net loss of US$ 15.3 million). — Interest on bank borrowings reduced by 37% to US$ 17.5 million (2020: US$ 27.6 million) following refinancing of the Group’s debt facility and reduction in LIBOR with both margin and average LIBOR decreasing to 3.0% and 0.2% (2020: 5.0% and 1.0%). — Net bank debt3 reduced to US$ 371.3 million (2020: US$ 406.2 million). Net leverage ratio4 reduced to 5.8 times (2020: 8.0 times). — Successful issuance of equity by 30 June 2021 removed potential event of default, which in turn removed material uncertainty as to the Group’s ability to continue as a Going Concern reported in 2020. 2021 Operational Highlights — Average fleet utilisation increased by 3 percentage points to 84% (2020: 81%) with notable improvements in both S- and E-Class vessels at 98% (2020: 92%) and 72% (2020: 65%) respectively. Average utilisation for K-Class vessels remained flat at 86% (2020: 86%). — Average day rates marginally increased to US$ 25.7k (2020: US$ 25.3k) with recent awards in the second half of the year showing significant improvement. — New charters and extensions secured in year totalled 9.6 years (2020: 6.6 years). — Operational downtime remains low at 1.5% (2020: 1.6%). — Border restrictions and quarantine requirements in relation to COVID-19 have shown signs of easing in latter part of 2021. — Strengthening of Board with the appointment of two independent non-executive Directors in February 2021 and May 2021 and one non-executive Director in August 2021. 2022 Highlights and Outlook — Secured utilisation for 2022 currently stands at 88% against actual utilisation of 84% in 2021. — Anticipate continued improvement on day rates as Middle East vessel demand outstrips supply on the back of a strong pipeline of opportunities. — Average secured day rates over 12% higher than 2021 actual levels. — Reversal of impairment recognised with a value of US$ 15.0 million indicative of improving long-term market conditions. — Group anticipates net leverage ratio to be below 4.0 times by the end of 2022 without relying on a second equity raise. NON-FINANCIAL INFORMATION STATEMENT See Glossary. 1 Represents operating profit/(loss) after adding back depreciation, amortisation and the reversal of impairment in 2021 and depreciation, amortisation, an impairment charge and adjusting items in 2020. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s underlying performance that management can more directly influence in the short term and is comparable from year to year. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. 2 Represents net profit/(loss) after adding back depreciation, amortisation the reversal of impairment and adjusting items in 2021 and depreciation, amortisation, an impairment charge and adjusting items in 2020. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management can more directly influence and is comparable from year to year. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. 3 Represents total bank borrowings less cash. 4 Represents the ratio of net bank debt to adjusted EBITDA. The Group has complied with the requirements of s414CB of the Companies Act 2006 by including certain non-financial information within the strategic report. The table below sets out where relevant information can be found within this report*: Reporting requirement and policies and standards which govern our approach: Information necessary to understand our business and its impact, policy due diligence and outcomes: Environmental matters • Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Policy • Climate change strategy • Carbon emission reporting • Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) • GHG emissions, page 12 • People and values section, page 4 • Carbon emission reporting, page 12 • TCFD, page 4 Employees • Anti-Corruption and Bribery Policy • Social Responsibility Policy • Whistleblowing Policy • Health and safety standards • Diversity and equal opportunities • Employee engagement and welfare Human rights • Disability Policy • Anti-Slavery Policy • Code of Conduct Policy • Ethical practises, page 15 • Ethical practises, page 15 • Ethical practises, page 15, and Audit and Risk Committee report page 52 • Health and safety, page 17 • Diversity, page 14, Directors’ Report, page 74 • Employee engagement and welfare, page 15 • Employees and policies, Directors’ Report, page 76 • Ethical practises, page 15 • Ethical practises, page 15, Risk management page 32 Principal risks and impact on business activity • Risk management, pages 28 to 33 Remuneration Policy Description of the business model Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) • Remuneration Policy, page 58 • Our business model, page 18 • KPIs, page 34 * Further details on policies and procedures are available on our corporate website: www.gmsplc.com Annual Report 2021 1 Strategic Report CHAIRMAN’S REVIEW Turning the Corner 2021 saw a number of positive steps being made by the Group as the business continues to turn around. A new bank deal and subsequent equity raise helped stabilise the balance sheet, removing a potential event of default with our banks. Improving demand for our vessels led to utilisation being the highest in the last six years, driving an increase in day rates for contracts awarded in the second half of the year, which we will see the benefit of in 2022. The Group reported improved margins driven by increased revenues leading to its first reported net profit since 2016. Capital structure and liquidity Net bank debt reduced to US$ 371.3 million (2020: US$ 406.2 million). A combination of reduced debt and improved adjusted EBITDA led to a 28% reduction in the net leverage ratio reducing from 8.0 times in 2020 to 5.8 times at the end of 2021. The Group will continue its focus on organically reducing leverage going forward. Commercial and operations The Group secured nine new contracts in the year, worth US$ 66.0 million (2020: seven contracts worth US$ 18.0 million). Tender and bid activity increased, with 2.6 vessel years of projects that are due to commence in 2022 currently in the pipeline. Evolution commenced its first long-term contract utilising its cantilever system. The Group successfully concluded a US$ 27.8 million equity raise in June 2021 which prevented an event of default on its loan facilities. Under these facilities, the Group is required to raise a further US$ 50 million of equity by the end of 2022 or issue 87.6 million warrants entitling the Group’s banks to acquire 132 million shares, or 11.5% of the share capital of the Company, for a total consideration of GBP £7.9 million, or 6.0p per share. The Group is exploring the various contractual options available per the current bank terms to take place by the end of 2022. As disclosed, the two options available are the raise of US$ 50 million equity or the issuance of 87.6 million warrants giving potential rights to 132 million shares if exercised. As at 31 December 2021, neither of the two contractual scenarios had been ruled out. The Board however consider the more likely outcome will be the issuance of warrants rather than the equity raise. Interest on bank borrowings reduced by 36.5% to US$ 17.5 million (2020: US$ 27.6 million) following the renegotiation of the Group’s bank facility in March 2021, the reduction in net bank debt, following the successful equity raise and a reduction in average LIBOR to 0.2% (2020: 1.0%), (refer to Note 36 in the consolidated financial statements). Despite challenges brought by COVID the Group has achieved its best year for financial performance for many years. Average utilisation, particularly for K-Class vessels, has remained at its highest since 2016. New charters and extensions secured in year totalled 9.6 years. Operational downtime continued the trend of recent years of being low at 1.5% (2020: 1.6%). Governance Three new non-executive Directors joined the Board during 2021, with the appointment of Jyrki Koskelo, Anthony St John and Charbel El Khoury in February, May, and August 2021 respectively. I currently hold the position of Chairman and Chief Executive, leading the business and the Board. Whilst holding the positions of both Chairman and Chief Executive is not recommended by the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code), the Board has concluded that, at this stage in the Group’s turnaround process, this continues to be appropriate. This recognises both the level and pace of change necessary for the Group and its relatively small scale. This will be regularly assessed by the Board as the Group progresses through its turnaround process. Group performance Revenue increased by 12.3% to US$ 115.1 million (2020: US$ 102.5 million) with an increase in utilisation of 3 percentage points to 84% (2020: 81%) and with notable improvements in both S- and E-Class vessels at 98% (2020: 92%) and 72% (2020: 65%) respectively. K- Class vessels remained flat at 86% (2020: 86%). Average day rates across the fleet marginally increased to US$ 25.7k (2020: US$ 25.3k). Certain contracts awarded in the latter half of the year, which are due to commence in 2022, saw significant day rate improvements on legacy contracts. Vessel operating expenses decreased by 2.6% to US$ 41.2 million (2020: $42.3 million), despite the increase in utilisation. General and administrative expenses reduced by US$ 5.9 million to US$ 12.3 million, of which US$ 5.6 million related to non-recurring adjusting items in 2020 and the balance reflecting savings from the final phase of the Group’s cost-cutting exercise. Adjusted EBITDA was US$ 64.1 million, up 27.2% from the previous year (2020: US$ 50.4 million) mainly driven by improved utilisation, particularly in the Group’s higher earning E- and S-Class vessels. During the year there was a reversal of previous impairment charges of US$ 15.0 million, indicative of improvements to long-term market conditions and non- operational finance expenses totalling US$ 1.7 million following the extinguishment of the old debt facility and recognition the new debt facility that completed in the year, (refer to Note 30 in the consolidated financial statements). The Group returned to profitability for the first time since 2016 with a net profit for the year of US$ 31.2 million (2020: net loss of US$ 124.3 million) and an adjusted net profit of US$ 18.0 million (2020: adjusted net loss of US$ 15.3 million). 2 Gulf Marine Services PLC Revenue Gross profit/(loss) Adjusted EBITDA1 Impairment reversal/(impairment) Net profit/(loss) for the year Adjusted net profit/(loss)2 2021 US$m 115.1 60.6 64.1 15.0 31.2 18.0 2020 US$m 102.5 (55.5) 50.4 (87.2) (124.3) (15.3) 2019 US$m 108.7 (25.0) 51.4 (59.1) (85.5) (20.0) 1 Represents operating profit/(loss) after adding back depreciation, amortisation and the reversal of impairment in 2021 and depreciation, amortisation, an impairment charge and adjusting items in 2020. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s underlying performance that management can more directly influence in the short term and is comparable from year to year. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. 2 Represents net profit/(loss) after adding back depreciation, amortisation the reversal of impairment and adjusting items in 2021 and depreciation, amortisation, an impairment charge and adjusting items in 2020. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management can more directly influence and is comparable from year to year. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. The Group has complied with the requirements of LR 9.8.6(8)R, by reporting on a ‘comply or explain’ basis against the 11 recommended TCFD disclosures. As of 31 December 2021, the Group was unable to make disclosures that were consistent with those of the TCFD for ten out of the eleven disclosures. The Group aims to be fully compliant by 31 December 2022. Refer to page 4 for further details. Outlook Due to the strong pipeline of opportunities expected to come to the market, the Group anticipates seeing continued improvements in day rate and utilisation levels in 2022. Secured utilisation for 2022 currently stands at 88% (equivalent in 2021: 73%). Secured backlog stands at US$ 179.2 million as at 1 April 2022 (US$ 207.3 million as at 1 April 2021) and average secured day rates at US$ 28.9k, 12.6% higher than 2021 actual average day rates. Given the current high levels of utilisation secured, combined with higher day rates, the Group expects the financial performance to continue to improve and reiterates its EBITDA guidance of between US$ 70-US$ 80 million for 2022. Mansour Al Alami Executive Chairman 12 May 2022 Removal of material uncertainty The Group is currently operating as a Going Concern without any material uncertainties. This is the first time the Group has been operating as Going Concern without any material uncertainties since 2017. Safety There were two recordable injuries in the early part of 2021. One Lost Time Injury and one Restricted Work Day Case. This led to an increase in our Total Recordable Injury Rate from 0.0 (2020) to 0.2 (2021), and an increase in our Lost Time Injury rate from 0.0 (2020) to 0.1 (2021). These levels remain significantly below industry average and in both cases have since returned to zero in early 2022. Two vessels celebrated safety milestones in the year, with both Evolution and Endeavour reaching five years without incident. We continue to develop our systems and processes to ensure that our offshore operations are as safe as possible in line with the expectations of our customers and stakeholders. Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures This year the Annual Report includes our first Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This is a new requirement for premium listed companies on the London Stock Exchange. We welcome the introduction of this regulation, having previously committed to adopting the TCFD recommendations by 2022. GMS acknowledged climate change as an emerging risk in 2019, and in December 2021, recognised it as a principal risk. Annual Report 2021 3 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES Delivering on Our Responsibility for A Sustainable Future Environmental, Social and Governance Factors Recognising the Group’s principal activities continues to be the provision of vessels to the offshore oil, gas and renewable energy sectors, We are constantly looking for ways to reduce our impact on the environment. Below are some of the most recent initiatives that we have implemented to reduce emissions across the business, refer to page 14 for further details. In 2022, GMS will be measuring itself against the “The global standards for sustainability reporting” or “GRI Standards” to enable it to report consistently and transparently on progress. As a premium listed FTSE firm, the Group is required under the UK Listing Rules to adopt the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and included below is the first assessment and plan going forward. The mandatory report of Greenhouse Gas Emissions is also provided below. Environment Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Report 2021 The Group has complied with the requirements of LR 9.8.6(8)R, by reporting on a ‘comply or explain’ basis against the 11 recommended TCFD disclosures as outlined further below. As of 31 December 2021, the Group was unable to make disclosures that were consistent with those of the TCFD for ten out of the eleven disclosures due to the fact that TCFD compliance activities were not initiated until Q4 2021. Where we have not complied, we have provided our anticipated date for compliance and the next steps. The Board took the decision in December 2021 to include climate change as a principal risk, albeit it is one which the Board considers to have a low overall likelihood/ impact on the Group’s operations as at 31 December 2021 (refer to the Governance section below and Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements for further details). Following this decision, further work has been undertaken during 2022 by management in conjunction with a third party ESG advisor; and the Group aims to be fully compliant with all eleven disclosures by 31 December 2022. We have assessed where we can improve in the future to provide the fullest disclosure on each recommendation. As a result, in 2022 we will be undertaking a full Scope 3 analysis, developing a net-zero strategy, and financially modelling our climate-related risks and opportunities. The table below outlines each disclosure with its compliance status as of 31 December 2021 and our aim is to become fully compliant in 2022. Compliance with and departures from the TCFD recommendations Theme Disclosure Position as of 31 December 2021 Planned compliance date and plans to achieve compliance Governance a) Describe the board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. Compliant as at 31 December 2021 Strategy b) Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities. a) Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organisation has identified over the short, medium, and long term. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022, management will monitor all potential risks and opportunities to the business and to include climate change as a key risk for discussion during risk management workshops. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022, we will financially assess the climate- related risks to determine those which could have material financial impact on the organisation. This process will be described in our 2022 report. 4 Gulf Marine Services PLC Theme Disclosure Position as of 31 December 2021 Planned compliance date and plans to achieve compliance Strategy continued Risk management Metrics & targets b) Describe the impact of Non-compliant 31 December 2022 climate-related risks and opportunities on the organisation’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning. In 2022, after our financial impact assessment, we will be able to describe potential impacts of climate-related issues on our financial performance and where it has been used in our financial planning process. We will also be developing a net-zero strategy in line with the emission reduction commitments of jurisdictions where we operate. c) Describe the resilience of the organisation’s strategy, taking into consideration different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°C or lower scenario. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022, we will expand on the potential impact of climate-related issues on financial performance based on our financial assessment. a) Describe the organisation’s Non-compliant 31 December 2022 processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks. b) Describe the organisation’s processes for managing climate-related risks. c) Describe how processes for identifying, assessing, and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organisation’s overall risk management. a) Disclose the metrics used by the organisation to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process. b) Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2, and, if appropriate, Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks. c) Describe the targets used by the organisation to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets. In 2022, we will continue to establish/enhance the Group’s processes for the identification and assessing of climate related risks. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022, we will ensure that climate change is included as a key risk for consideration in our overall risk management workshop and feedback the outcomes to the Audit and Risk Committee. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022, we will undertake a climate change specific risk management workshop with a third party specialist to determine risks, opportunities and mitigating actions required by the Group. These risks and measures will be included in the overall risk register. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022, we will calculate GMS’s Scope 3 emissions and formulate its net-zero strategy. Without understanding GMS’s global carbon footprint, it is impossible to develop climate-related metrics in line with the corporate strategy and risk management process. Non-compliant for Scope 3 31 December 2022 In 2022 we will calculate GMS’s Scope 3 emissions and highlight material emission categories. Non-compliant 31 December 2022 In 2022 we will calculate GMS’s full emissions footprint, and from this baseline, we will formulate emission reduction targets and pathways. In future years, we will report annual progress against these targets. Annual Report 2021 5 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES continued Overview – Where do we stand with TCFD? The Group recognises that as part of our long-term business strategy, we need to operate responsibly, and as part of this, as we achieve compliance with the TCFD disclosure requirements, we want to be transparent about the climate-related risks and opportunities facing our business. This is an area where our industry as a whole needs to improve, and as such, we welcome the introduction of mandatory TCFD reporting. We recognise that climate change is a growing area of concern for all businesses, and the adoption of the TCFD disclosure requirements in 2022 will allow us to carefully analyse the associated risks and opportunities to our operations. The TCFD categorises the risks as transition and physical. Transition risks are the risks associated with the decarbonisation of the global economy; physical risks are associated with acute and chronic impacts of the changing climate. Governance – Ensuring accountability and responsibility for climate-related risks. Climate change has become an area of increased interest for the Board, senior management, and GMS’ stakeholders in recent years. In 2019 climate change was recognised as an emerging risk, and in December 2021, it was added as a principal risk. As explained in Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, the Board does not believe the Group will face any significant negative impacts of climate change on demand levels for its vessels in the near term (due to a combination of: the expected continued demand for oil and gas to be produced in the Group’s core market of the Middle East; and the alternative opportunities that exist for the Group to deploy more of its fleet in offshore renewables in the long-term without major additional capital expenditure being required on its vessels in order to do so). On this basis, the Board has determined the overall risk of climate change to remain as low likelihood, low impact as at 31 December 2021. Notwithstanding this assessment, elevating the risk of climate change to a principal risk will mean that it will be discussed going forward at each Board meeting as part of the principal risk review item and be part of the Group’s enterprise risk assessment procedures which are described below under Risk Management and in the broader Risk Management section of this Annual Report. The TCFD recommendations have provided guidance for improving GMS’s climate- change governance mechanisms, such as the introduction of climate scenario analysis in January 2022, and the financial modelling which is planned for Q2 2022. This analysis/ modelling was not performed in 2021 as TCFD compliance activities were not initiated until Q4 2021/Q1 2022. We will however continue to monitor developments in the TCFD framework and ensure that we develop our processes accordingly to ensure that we are able to increase our disclosure compliance levels in the future. The Board’s Oversight The Board has overall responsibility for ensuring that risks are effectively managed. As part of its regular risk assessment procedures going forward, the Board will take account of the significance of ESG matters, including climate change, to GMS’ business. It reviews and discusses risk management at each principal Board meeting, focussing on principal risks. The Board reviews the risk profile formally on an annual basis. In the February 2021 Board meeting, risks were discussed and climate change remained an emerging risk. In December 2021, it moved climate change onto the principal risk heat map when it was discussed as part of the ESG review. The Audit and Risk Committee has been delegated the responsibility for reviewing the effectiveness of the Group’s system of internal control and procedures as a practical matter, including climate change as a principal risk as of December 2021. It will receive reports from external advisers as required, to enable it to discharge its duties and to be given a deeper level of insight on certain business matters. It was not feasible to assess the potential financial impacts of the risks and opportunities of climate change on the business in 2021. The quantification of the potential risks and opportunities will be introduced into the climate risk assessment process in Q2 of 2022 and be subject to the Audit and Risk Committee’s internal controls. Senior Management’s role The Senior Management team (the Group Financial Controller, the Group Financial Accounting Team Leader, and the HSEQ Manager) is responsible for assessing, managing, and reporting the potential risks and opportunities to the Board and the Risk and Audit Committee. From 2022 onwards, this will include risks associated with climate change. The Senior Management team will meet with the Executive Chairman at least twice a year to conduct risk management workshops. Senior management has provisionally evaluated the potential long term impacts of climate change through climate scenario analysis. In 2022, it will conduct further financial impact modelling and submit the results to the Audit and Risk Committee for its internal control processes. Figure 1 below provides an overview of the delegation of responsibilities between the Board, the Audit and Risk Committee and the Senior Management team. Figure 1: Delegation of responsibilities for risk management, including climate-related risks, in GMS The Board The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s strategy and ensuring effective risk management. The Audit and Risk Committee The Committee’s responsibilities include reviewing the Group’s internal control and risk management systems as well as monitoring the effectiveness of the Group’s internal audit function. Senior Management The Senior Management team implements the risk management process from risk identification to management and mitigation. 6 Gulf Marine Services PLC To determine the inherent risk of each potential risk, the impact and likelihood are combined to give the inherent risk rating. A Green, Amber or Red classification is assigned based on the inherent risk rating and the control effectiveness. A Red rating represents an elevated inherent risk rating with limited current controls. The Amber risk classification indicates an elevated inherent risk rating with some risk exposure remaining after introduced controls. The Green risk rating means the risk exposure is low. Eight of the sixteen provisional risks identified have an Amber rating in at least one scenario and timeline and two of the sixteen are have been linked to two scenarios. Table 1 below shows the scenarios and timeline when each risk is initially classified as Amber. The other six risks considered have a Green rating across all scenarios and timelines. None of the risks identified have a red risk rating as at 31 December which is consistent with the Board’s view that shows no immediate significant financial impact of climate change on the carrying value of the Group’s assets as at 31 December 2021. The Group’s risk management system is explained on page 28. Strategy – Building climate resilience into our business strategy. Climate change was recognised as an emerging risk in 2019, and since the addition of climate change as a principal risk in December 2021 in response to the TCFD recommendations, the Board has initiated work to understand the impact of climate change on the Group’s operations, strategy, and financial planning. As a result of this, an initial climate change risk management workshop was arranged and facilitated by an external ESG advisor in January 2022 where the results of a detailed climate- related scenario analysis were discussed. The analysis was carried out across GMS’s three office locations (Abu Dhabi, Doha, and Dammam) and two vessel locations (the Gulf and the North Sea). The preliminary results of this workshop are presented below. The preliminary climate-related scenario analysis conducted in Q1 2022, together with subsequent analyses planned to take place during the coming months, will enable Senior Management to assess the Group’s operational resilience to potential climate- related risks and opportunities. Each potential climate-related risk and opportunity will be provisionally assessed and classified through the use of the Group’s existing risk classification process over the short (2020-2025), medium (2025-2035) and long (2035-2050) term to determine the inherent impact on the business strategy. This was the first year that GMS has been required to fully integrate the TCFD recommendations into the risk management framework and, as noted above, it has not achieved compliance with ten of the eleven TCFD requirements as of 31 December 2021. One area of non-compliance noted was that the Group has not reported the potential financial impacts of climate change on its operations. As disclosed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the current analysis shows no immediate significant financial impact of climate change on the carrying value of the Group’s assets as at 31 December 2021. The intention is to achieve full compliance with the TCFD disclosures as at 31 December 2022; and therefore during 2022, Senior Management will conduct the necessary financial modelling of the potential risks and opportunities and the aim is to report on the financial impacts in next year’s TCFD Disclosure. Climate scenarios are possible future global warming pathways that can be used to interrogate GMS’s potential climate-related risks and opportunities over the short, medium and long term. This will enable Senior Management to evaluate its operational resilience to climate change and introduce mitigation measures. Table 1 lists the eight climate-related risks provisionally identified as having an Amber rating in at least one scenario and timeline. The scenarios were modelled using data from several established models, including CORDEX (Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment), CLIMADA (Climate Adaptation) and IAM (Integrated Assessment Models) data. Climate Warming Pathways: • <2°C by 2100: approximately aligned with the Paris Agreement target of max. 1.5°C of warming above pre-Industrial levels. This scenario requires coordinated efforts by governments and businesses to rapidly reduce carbon emissions through policy and operational changes, leading to high levels of transition risks but limited physical risks. • 2-3°C by 2100: based on the pledges agreed at the end of COP26, it is estimated that this is the level of warming currently expected. This scenario is envisaged as the outcome of reactive action from governments, with policy being introduced ad-hoc, whilst only the most committed businesses take serious action; it is associated with the highest level of transition risks with some physical risks. • >3°C by 2100: little to no action is taken over the next few decades in this scenario leading to limited transition risks but the highest level of physical risks. The three warming pathways present a range of potential climate-related risks to GMS’s operations over the short, medium and long term. Eight climate indicators, including precipitation, aridity and temperature, were provisionally modelled for each site and scenario. The most severe physical risks from climate change are present in the >3ºC scenario, and the transition risks are highest in the <2ºC and 2-3ºC scenarios. As most of the Group’s operations are already in extreme climate conditions, the infrastructure we own has been built accordingly. The office buildings in the Middle East region are exposed to above 40ºC days for consecutive months. Therefore, the region’s infrastructure design and our working schedules already consider these extreme weather conditions. Future scenario analyses will enable senior management to stress test GMS’s operational and strategic resilience to climate change each year. Annual Report 2021 7 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES continued Table 1: Provisional Transition risks with an Amber rating, with the scenario and timeline in which an Amber rating is first assigned. Risk Type Climate-related Risk Scenario Timeline Potential Likelihood Potential Impact Context <2ºC Short Almost certain Moderate GMS is listed on the London Stock Transition risk Increased policy and reporting requirements in the UK Exchange and is subject to UK climate change and environmental reporting regulations. Such changes to policy and reporting requirements are considered to be almost certain to occur in the short term. However, the concentration of the Group’s vessels in the Middle East region (with only one of the Group’s vessels currently located in the UK) would likely mean that the potential operational/financial impact of such changes would be limited to Moderate. The Group aims to mitigate this risk by carefully monitoring legislative developments to minimise instances of non-compliance with all relevant laws both in the UK and the Middle East. Fewer climate-related policy obligations are anticipated for operational Gulf sites (as compared to the UK reporting regulations noted above) in the short term, hence the potential likelihood of this risk deemed to be lower (“Possible” as compared to “Almost certain”) than that noted above for the UK. However, if such policies and increased regulations were to be introduced over a longer time period, then the concentration of GMS’ fleet in the Middle East would result in a relatively higher (“Significant”) potential impact. The Group carefully monitors legislative developments to aim to ensure compliance with all relevant laws both in the UK and the Middle East. There is increasing concern over fossil fuel use in the UK/EU, although demand for oil and gas is predicted to grow. Although as a result new investors may become more challenging to find, current shareholders (>50% of which are Middle East based) are heavily invested in the Company’s existing strategy and business model and therefore the likelihood of a Significant impact is only considered Possible in the short term. This TCFD disclosure will inform investors about our response to climate-related risks and opportunities. Increased policy and reporting requirements in the UAE <2°C 2-3°C Medium Medium Possible Possible Significant Significant Changing investor sentiment <2°C Short Possible Significant 8 Gulf Marine Services PLC Risk Type Climate-related Risk Scenario Timeline Potential Likelihood Potential Impact Context <2°C 2-3°C Short Short Possible Possible Significant Significant Transition risk continued Wider stakeholder concern; reduced revenue from negative impacts on workforce management and planning (e.g., employee attraction and retention) Costs to transition to lower emissions technology <2°C 2-3°C Medium Medium Possible Unlikely Major Major It is possible in the short term that increased stakeholder concern may be seen, including from employees who may start to take company environmental action and preparedness into account. This could impact the Group’s revenue and employee retention. In a <2°C, where action is required, this concern could be greater. It would be lower in a 2-3°C where action is being taken sporadically. However, given the Group’s workforce requirement is concentrated in its core market of the Middle East, where the expectation is that the economy will continue to be reliant upon and supportive of oil and gas production for many years, it is not anticipated that the Group will not be able to attract suitably experienced/qualified employees so as to avoid any operational disruption. We will aim to provide disclosures to inform our stakeholders of our plans to respond to climate related risks. A requirement to transitioning to lower emissions technology is possible in the medium term under a <2ºC scenario and this could be associated with additional costs for GMS. The impact could be the same in a 2-3ºC but this is considered unlikely. This is still an amber risk despite the reduced likelihood given potential quantum. We are aware that we may need to consider environmental legislation when replacing vessels that are being retired in the long term. In this event, significant R&D would be needed for electric vessels. GMS will consider buying these when they are available. However, as per Note 5 of the consolidated financial statements, as an operator of state-of-the-art vessels in both the oil and gas and renewables (offshore wind) sectors with experience in multiple geographical areas, the Group’s fleet offers significant operational flexibility. For the reasons noted above, the risk of changes in operational policies and regulations in the Group’s core market of the Middle East is only considered as Possible in the Medium term. Further, the Group anticipates there will be sufficient future demand to deploy its fleet in both the offshore oil and gas markets in the Middle East and the UK and/ or to the renewables market without the need to incur major additional capital expenditure on the vessels. Annual Report 2021 9 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES continued Risk Type Climate-related Risk Scenario Timeline Potential Likelihood Potential Impact Context Transition risk continued Introduction of Carbon pricing and taxes <2°C 2-3°C Medium Medium Likely Possible Significant Major It is likely that in a <2°C scenario, carbon pricing and taxes could be introduced in the medium term and the potential cost impacts of this could be significant. For a 2-3°C scenario, the likelihood is considered possible and the impact could be major, as pricing would/may be introduced more gradually. Changes in tax legislation will be closely monitored and internal models can be used to factor this into the business strategy. 2-3°C Long Likely Significant Given the Group’s core market is in the Increased costs and/or reduced demand for products and services resulting from fines and judgments MENA region, management do not expect this to have a major impact in the short or medium term. However, if legislative developments are not carefully monitored to ensure full compliance, it is possible that there may be increased costs due to fines and potentially reduced demand for products. This is considered likely in the long term of the 2-3°C scenario and, if it happened, the impact could be significant. The Group mitigates this risk by closely monitoring compliance with current and future legislation so as to reduce the likelihood of receiving fines for non- compliance. In a <2°C scenario where urgent action is being taken, it is possible that there could be changing customer preferences resulting in reduced demand for goods and services. This could have a significant impact in the medium term. The Group will continue to monitor any shift in consumer demand across the regions it operates in. However as noted above and in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, a Westwood Global Energy Group report predicts an increase in demand for oil and gas over the next 40 years, including in the Group’s core markets. GMS also has a proven track record in the renewables sector which provides versatility in our business model such that the Board is confident that the Group will not face any significant impact on the demand for its vessels due to climate change implications beyond the extent reflected in management’s assumptions and sensitivities. <2°C Medium Possible Significant Changing consumer preference, reduced demand for goods and services due to a shift in consumer preferences 10 Gulf Marine Services PLC Transition risks GMS has provisionally identified three short term risks: increasing UK policy requirements, changing investor sentiment, and wider stakeholder concern. As a premium listed company on the London Stock Exchange with operations primarily in the Gulf region, GMS is subject to UK climate change and environmental reporting regulations. We foresee the short-term reporting obligations increasing in the UK under <2ºC and 2-3ºC scenarios, while we anticipate fewer climate-related policy obligations in our operational Gulf sites. The Group will continue to monitor upcoming legislation for both regions to aim to ensure compliance. There is increasing investor and wider stakeholder interest in how we engage with climate change as a business. If we do not respond appropriately to changing investor sentiment, there is a risk to our ability to raise capital, especially from investors operating outside of the Middle East region. It is essential to highlight however that our client base is predominately in the Middle East, a region home to five of the top ten oil- producing countries and is responsible for producing approximately 27% of the world’s oil production. In addition, our two largest investors (>50%) and our banking is based in the Middle East. Although the transition to cleaner energy continues to gather pace, demand for oil and gas will continue to account for over half of the energy mix by 2040 (Westwood Global Energy Group report), even in the most ambitious energy transition scenario. Based on the predicted continued growth of the oil and gas industry in the Middle East, the Board consider the risk of investor sentiment changing within this region is relatively low (“Possible” per the table above) in the immediate near term. Nevertheless, we recognise that the likelihood of this risk will increase in the medium to long-term in the <2ºC and 2-3ºC scenarios. By providing relevant disclosures in future periods, we will inform our investors and wider stakeholders, including our employees, about any changes to our current business model and strategy concerning climate change. We identified a long term risk as the transition to greener vessels and those able to operate in deeper seas. The costs of transitioning to lower emission technology have also been considered. We anticipate the risk likelihood of changing vessels will increase over time, alongside improvements in industry research and the development of greener vessels. Although we have not financially modelled each risk as at 31 December 2021, the Board do not consider that vessel replacement costs would significantly impact our business at this point in time. The Board expect that existing vessels will likely need to be retired/ fully depreciated across their remaining useful lives before we are required to replace them with greener options. One climate-related opportunity previously identified was GMS’s vessel support to the renewable sector. This opportunity introduces versatility to GMS’s strategy as the Board reviews the potential impacts of the transition to a low carbon global economy. Physical risks Our offices and most of our vessels are located in the Gulf region, which experiences an extreme climate with high temperatures, low precipitation, and high water stress. The region is well prepared to withstand extreme heat with regulations to restrict people from working outside during the hottest part of the day and buildings designed to withstand high temperatures. The provisional climate analysis suggests that sandstorms will become more frequent as temperatures rise and precipitation decreases. Each of the Group’s vessels is equipped with a specialised filtration device to reduce the risk of sandstorms damaging the vessels’ engines. Climate change will likely exacerbate water stress in the region; each of the Group’s vessels is equipped with desalination equipment to mitigate water stress. All the above risks have therefore provisionally been assigned a Green rating. The provisional climate analysis suggests that sea-level rise in the long-term may affect the depth at which our vessels can operate. The types of vessels we invest in moving forward after retiring existing assets will therefore need to be able to operate at greater depths. Risk management – Embedding climate into our enterprise risk assessment process. Climate change is a wide-ranging and complex topic increasingly important to the general public, clients, investors and employees. In December 2021, climate change was added to our principal risks, which means it will now be fully embedded in the Group’s enterprise risk assessment process going forward. The Group’s enterprise risk assessment process begins with identifying and assessing risks. Mitigating controls are then identified. Identified risks are consolidated by the Senior Management into an overall heatmap for principal risks. The Audit and Risk Committee will review the risk profile at least quarterly. The Board will discuss the Group’s risk register at each of its principal meetings and review the risk profile formally on an annual basis. The introduction of TCFD has helped start the development of GMS’s climate risk assessment with the introduction annual of climate scenario analysis in 2022 to understand the impacts of climate change on our operations. This will further evolve in 2022 with financial impact assessment. Climate scenario analysis and subsequent risks assessment were not conducted during 2021 and first provisional assessment has been conducted in January 2022. Three interrelated steps were undertaken as part of this: Step 1 – Identifying the risks: Senior management, with the support of specialists, used climate-scenario analysis to provisionally identify sixteen potential transition and physical risks to the business over three climate warming pathways and three timelines. Step 2 – Assessing the risks: These provisional risks were presented to relevant internal stakeholders, including the Chief Financial Officer. The provisional risks were presented at Group and site levels. Following our existing enterprise risk assessment process and drawing on the relevant expertise of Senior Management, each provisional climate-related risk and opportunity was given a likelihood and impact rating, which were combined to provide the inherent risk rating for each scenario and timeline. Step 3 – Addressing the risks: Control actions can be implemented to prevent, reduce or mitigate risk. Each provisional risk was appraised to determine the most appropriate approach and control actions defined. A provisional control effectiveness rating was assigned, which, combined with the inherent risk rating, allowed each provisional risk to be given an overall rating of Red, Amber or Green for each scenario and timeline. Overall, ten risks were provisionally assigned an Amber rating in at least one scenario and timeline. From 2022 onwards, this process be will repeated at least annually with the climate scenario models rerun, the provisional risks being reassessed, and the controls checked to ensure they are still appropriate. There will also be risk management workshops at least bi-annually between the Executive Chairman and the Senior Management team where principal risks, including climate change, will be assessed for impact and likelihood. Annual Report 2021 11 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES continued Metrics & targets – Identifying, measuring and monitoring our environmental impact. Our Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been calculated and reported on since 2019. Our Scope 1 emissions are related to the direct consumption of gas and fuels utilised for the Group’s vessel operations. Our Scope 2 emissions are related to our indirect emissions due to our consumption of purchased electricity in day to day business operations. The Group uses no natural gas. We adhere to Streamlined Energy & Carbon Reporting (SECR) regulations. We have set 2019 as the baseline year for measuring and monitoring our Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Currently, most of the Group’s emissions footprint is related to our fleet’s combustion of transportation fuels, but this is subject to change when we aim to calculate our Scope 3 emissions in 2022. Our vessels are leased to client’s long term, but we account for their GHG emissions within our footprint. Our emission reduction efforts thus far have been focused on reducing our Scope 1 and 2 emissions. We are pleased to report a decrease in our Scope 1 and 2 emissions. However, we expect the significant drop in 2021 levels to be counteracted as we come out of the coronavirus pandemic. We report on our emissions annually to track improvements and intend to set reduction targets once Scope 3 calculations and our net-zero strategy are complete in 2022. We have established workstreams to measure and track our progress against key goals set by the Group. Our work contributes towards helping the business grow whilst aiming to reduce our environmental impact to build climate resilience. The Group aims to identify and implement achievable emissions reporting targets by working closely with an expert third party and formalising a climate policy to meet these targets as a priority. See energy efficiency actions below. Carbon Emission Reporting Scope 1 direct emissions (fugitive emissions and transportation fuels) for this year of reporting are 50,170 tCO2e, resulting from the direct combustion of 184,706,865 kWh of fuel. This represents a carbon increase of 10% from last year. Scope 2 indirect emissions (purchased electricity) for this year of reporting are 31 tCO2e, resulting from the consumption of 71,784 kWh of electricity purchased and consumed in day-to-day business operations. This represents a carbon reduction of 94% from last year. In 2022, GMS’s full Scope 3 emissions will be calculated, and its net-zero strategy formulated. Consistent with the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Value Chain Accounting & Reporting Standard (version 1.0), GMS will aim to report on all the applicable Scope 3 categories. Once available, a complete GHG inventory will allow Senior Management to examine GMS’s GHG emissions, set reduction targets, formulate a realistic net-zero strategy, and appropriately assess the Group’s operational risk from climate change in line with climate-related scenarios. Our operations have an intensity metric of 417.02 tCO2e per US$m total revenue for this reporting year. This represents a reduction in operational carbon intensity of 7%, from the previous reporting year. Scope 1 and 2 consumption and CO2e emission data has been calculated in line with the 2019 UK Government environmental reporting guidance. The following Emission Factor Databases consistent with the 2019 UK Government environmental reporting guidance have been used, utilising the current published kWh gross calorific value (CV) and kgCO2e relevant for reporting year 01/01/2021 – 31/12/2021: Database 2020, Version 1.0. The reporting boundary used for collation of the carbon emissions reporting data is the same as that used to prepare the consolidated financial statements. Figure 1: The trend in electricity, air travel, refrigerant and vessel fuel emissions from 2019-2021. Scope 1 – Company Car Emissions Scope 1 – Vessel Fuel Emissions Scope 1 – Air Travel Emissions* 56 39,192 871 66 42 56 42,951 42,851 39,192 2,662 902 871 Scope 1 – Refrigerant Emissions Scope 2 – Global Onshore Electricity Emissions (excluding UK consumption) 1,912 2017 3,554 2018 2019 2,520 31 1,912 580 479 31 2017 2018 2019 2017 2018 2019 2019 (tCO2e) 2020 (tCO2e) 2021 (tCO2e) * Air Travel Emissions for 2019 and 2020 calculated solely in-house. 2017 2018 2019 2017 2018 2019 12 Gulf Marine Services PLC The following figures show the detailed consumption and associated emissions for this reporting year for operations, with figures from the previous reporting period included for comparison. The total consumption (kWh) figures for reportable energy supplies are as follows: Utility and Scope Grid-Supplied Electricity (Scope 2) Gaseous and other fuels (Scope 1) Transportation (Scope 1) Total The total emission (tCO2e) figures for reportable energy supplies are as follows: Utility and Scope Grid-Supplied Electricity (Scope 2) Gaseous and other fuels (Scope 1) Transportation (Scope 1) Refrigerants (Scope 1) Total 2021 UK Consumption (kWh) 2021 Global (excluding UK) Consumption (kWh) 2020 UK Consumption (kWh) 2020 Global (excluding UK) Consumption (kWh) 0 0 71,784 0 0 0 815,940 0 15,330,963 169,375,902 18,089,737 147,946,495 15,330,963 169,447,686 18,089,737 148,762,435 2021 UK Consumption (tCO2e) 2021 Global (excluding UK) Consumption (tCO2e) 2020 UK Consumption (tCO2e) 2020 Global (excluding UK) Consumption (tCO2e) 0 0 31 0 0 0 479 0 4,022 44,206 4,674 38,219 0 4,022 1,912 46,148 0 4,674 2,520 41,217 An intensity metric of tCO2e per $m total revenue has been applied for our annual total emissions. The methodology of the intensity metric calculations are detailed in the appendix, and results of this analysis is as follows: Intensity Metric tCO2e / Total Revenue $m 2021 UK Intensity Metric 2021 Global (excluding UK) Intensity Metric 2020 UK Intensity Metric 2020 Global (excluding UK) Intensity Metric 34.76 398.78 45.6 402.15 Annual Report 2021 13 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES continued Energy efficiency actions Closures of Offices and Facilities The relocation of our offices and downsizing of onshore facilities has led to a 95% reduction in CO2 emissions produced by electricity consumption from 2020 to 2021. Decrease in business travel (COVID-19) Levels of business travel remain suppressed and due to changes in crew rotations, we have seen a slight decrease (4%) in air travel CO2 emissions. Moving forward, the Group aims to identify and implement achievable emissions reporting targets and formalise a climate policy to meet these targets as a priority. Change in refrigerant We changed the refrigerant used on our vessels for the cooling process, resulting in a 30% decrease in refrigerant emissions in 2020. In 2021 we decreased our refrigerant emissions by a further 25% through better maintenance and equipment. In addition, we are now evaluating using R32 on all our vessels which would significantly reduce the Global Warming Potential of our fleet. Table 2: Overarching goals and key workstreams to achieve them. Goal Key workstreams Reduce GHG emissions Restrict non-essential business travel Trialling of a lube oil filtration system on our vessels Expand our reporting to Scope 3 emissions next year Reduce refrigerant emissions Change Refrigerants Implement waste reduction plans We are developing a process to record waste data to set waste-related targets Engage our supply chain on its climate impact Reducing our use of plastic bottles offshore Conduct supplier environmental assessments Run climate scenario analysis on our key supplier routes Social Values Core values of Responsibility, Excellence and Relationships are incorporated into all aspects of the business. GMS is committed to ensuring the Health and safety of its employees, subcontractors, clients and partners and to upholding high ethical standards. Responsibility GMS is committed to the Health and Safety of its employees, subcontractors, clients and partners and to behaving with environmental responsibility. The Group’s focus is on ensuring the safety of everything it designs, constructs, operates and maintains. The Group believes it has responsibility across all business relationships. As part of that, it is continually seeking opportunities to grow the business and to create value for shareholders. This includes being cost- conscious and managing its risks effectively. Excellence The Company is always looking for ways to better meet client needs through continuous improvement. It aims to build on past experiences and to embrace innovation. 14 Gulf Marine Services PLC GMS sets itself challenging targets to deliver superior performance and exceed stakeholder expectations, including clients. The reputation and integrity of the business are important. Therefore, GMS works with rigour and transparency to ensure it is the preferred contractor of choice. Relationships The Company aims to attract and retain premium staff and ensure they are empowered to carry out their duties safely and effectively. GMS values employee diversity, the provision of an environment where employees can perform to their full potential and be rewarded for delivering excellence. Core values of Responsibility, Excellence and Relationships are incorporated into all aspects of the business. GMS is committed to ensuring the Health and Safety of its employees, subcontractors, clients and partners and to upholding high ethical standards. Turnover Voluntary employee turnover increased to 14% in 2021 versus 8% in 2020. The increase in the turnover trend was seen after the COVID restrictions were relaxed in some countries and are in line with pre-COVID levels of staff turnover. Diversity The Group’s workforce consists of 545 personnel recruited from 34 countries. The significant experience and skills individuals bring to GMS help it conduct its business globally. GMS recognises its talented and diverse workforce as a competitive advantage and ensures that diversity is maintained across all areas by implementing an Equal Opportunities Policy. The information on page 16 provides details of the gender diversity and country of origin of our personnel as of 31 December 2021. GMS has a zero-tolerance toward discrimination either directly or indirectly on the grounds of gender, race, colour, nationality, ethnic or racial origins, marital status, religion or disability. GMS is an equal opportunities employer committed to seeking out and retaining the calibre of human talent that is strategically aligned with our business GMS’ Code of Conduct sets out the basic rules of the Group. The Code’s purpose is to ensure work is undertaken safely, ethically, efficiently, and within the laws of the countries in which GMS operates. All staff receive Code of Conduct training as part of their induction, and the Group’s reputation and success are dependent on staff putting the Code into practice in all dealings with stakeholders. GMS maintains an awareness of human rights issues, which is reflected in its suite of Group policies, including the Anti-Corruption and Bribery Policy, Anti-Slavery Policy, Social Responsibility Policy and Whistleblowing Policy. Whistleblowing reporting service An independent reporting service for whistleblowing is in place. It operates confidentially, is available 24 hours a day and is staffed by highly skilled professional call handlers. This service: • gives a voice to employees, contractors, suppliers and supply chain and other stakeholders; • helps maintain a culture of openness; • demonstrates that GMS takes malpractice seriously; • provides Senior Management with an overall temperature of the business; and • supports employees who speak up. The Whistleblowing policy has a strict non-retaliation commitment to support any employees who speak up. growth and performance. Our business success is a reflection of the quality and skill of our people. Details of our Equal Opportunities Policy can be found in the Governance section of our website. Share ownership The Group has operated a long-term incentive plan since 2014. Please see pages 67 to 68 in the Remuneration Report for further details. Performance The Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) structure was redesigned during 2019 so that all participants, including Executive Directors, are working towards the same transparent targets. There is no guaranteed variable pay awards at GMS, with all pay being performance-based. The 2022 STIP measures for employees are set out at the bottom of the page. This aligns with shareholder interests and encourages a performance-based culture to achieve Group objectives. Succession planning GMS seeks to promote from within, where possible and to manage this, the Company has a succession planning process in place for employees based on years of experience and qualifications, however, due to the size of the business, external hires will be made where a post cannot be filled internally. The Group is engaged in fair and transparent recruitment practices. In 2021, GMS promoted 22 employees. Learning and development GMS aims to ensure that all employees maintain the relevant technical and regulatory training required to fulfil their roles. As seafarers, all crew maintain their relevant STCW (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping – a worldwide convention that ensures a lateral standard of training is achieved across all countries in the world) qualifications that license them to operate the Group’s vessels, in accordance with International Maritime Organisation requirements. For vessels operating within the offshore Oil & Gas Sector, all crew also complete additional training in areas such as, but not limited to, offshore safety and awareness and emergency response. Ethical practice The Group operates responsibly, in accordance with the formal legal and regulatory disclosure requirements expected of a UK listed company. For cultural and legal reasons, the extent to which the number of offshore female personnel can be increased is limited. Local labour laws, for example, in the countries in which GMS currently operates in the Middle East, stipulate those women cannot work in an inappropriate environment and hazardous jobs/industries, meaning the Company is unable to employ them offshore. As the provisions of the UK Government’s Equality Act 2010, relating to gender pay gap disclosure, are not applicable to GMS, this information has not been provided. Employee Engagement and Welfare The employee engagement survey was rolled out at the end of 2021, with an 82% completion rate. This is consistent with the last survey that was conducted in 2019 for the entire GMS workforce. The areas employees scored as needing attention are the frequency of communication, as a Group and between departments, and creating opportunities to provide constructive ideas on how to improve processes. In 2020, GMS launched it’s internal ‘Bright Ideas’ campaign to encourage employees to share their ideas to drive efficiencies in their areas of work. In 2021, the focus continued on employee’s Health and safety, due to the potential risks arising from COVID-19. There was regular COVID-19 onsite testing. All employees were actively encouraged to get vaccinated and the year-end vaccination rate is 98%. Onshore, GMS introduced Flexible Working Hours to improve work-life balance and drive efficiencies within the organisation with Work from Home option under certain circumstances. Crew rotations, for offshore employees, were changed to cater to COVID-19 travel and quarantine restrictions to adhere to client and government requirements. Rashed Al Jarwan was appointed as the new dedicated Workforce Engagement Director in 2021. A hybrid Town Hall style meeting was conducted with him for all onshore and offshore staff in the last quarter of 2021. On an ongoing basis, onshore employees are able to discuss items they feel relevant with management at Head Office and offshore employees have regular meetings with Operations to discuss any issues that affect them. Annual Report 2021 15 Strategic Report PEOPLE AND VALUES continued People Total number of employees Offshore 545 (2020: 532) 490 (2020: 479) Onshore 55 (2020: 53) Voluntary turnover 14% (2020: 8%) Nationalities 34 (2020: 35) Total number of Direct Reports to Senior Managers Total number of Senior Managers 13 11 3 2 3 Male Female GMS Employees – By Region 2021 Offshore Onshore 2017 2018 18 7 2019 113 2018 2019 2017 2 3 7 11 352 32 Africa Asia Europe MENA Other (Canada, Venezuela, New Zealand) 16 Gulf Marine Services PLC Health and safety The Group operates its vessels to the highest international health and safety standards. Management Systems, that govern all Company activities and operations are voluntarily accredited to ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001. All vessels operate in compliance with the International Safety Management (ISM) Code, meaning the International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, which is a legal requirement. Risks arising from operations and activities are routinely assessed to ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and communicated to all employees. All employees are made aware of the risks associated with operations through extensive training and employee engagement. Training programs are developed annually and reviewed periodically. The Group implemented and remote healthcare system for all of its offshore workforce in 2021, providing access to onshore Doctors and mental health support 24/7. The Group has recently implemented a Company-wide Marine Enterprise Resources Planning System to modernise and digitalise its vessel operations. The system integrates all aspects of vessel management through one web-based platform hosted on the cloud and accessed onshore and offshore. Management now has access to a centralised database used to enhance efficiency and improve decision-making. The information below is intended to provide an overview of the Health and Safety performance over the reporting period. Number of work-related fatalities Number of recordable work-related injuries Number of high-consequence work-related injuries 0 (2020: 0) 1 (2020: 0) Number of hours worked 1,962,081 (2020: 2,030,955) 1 (2020: 0) Governance For Governance related considerations, please refer to the Governance section of this Annual Report. Weighting Performance range (from zero to full pay-out) 40% (48% stretched) Less than US$ 30.0m – Greater than US$ 35.0m 40% (48% stretched) Less than US$ 50.0m – Greater than US$ 70.0m 10% (12% stretched) Less than 44.0% – Greater than 52.5% 10% (12% stretched) Less than 60% – Greater than 90% 100% US$ 30m 40% US$ 30.1m-US$ 35m 40-48%* max 120 days US’000 Number of days past due Trade receivables Less: Allowance for trade receivables Net trade receivables 2021 Trade receivables Less: Allowance for trade receivables Net trade receivables 2020 32,215 (169) 32,046 19,336 (80) 19,256 3,183 (8) 3,175 1,829 (4) 1,825 2,323 (6) 2,317 728 (2) 726 1,175 (3) 1,172 – – – 672 (2) 670 3 – 3 Total US’000 42,143 (195) 2,575 (7) 2,568 41,948 2,311 (47) 24,207 (133) 2,264 24,074 Eight customers (2020: six) account for 97% (2020: 99%) of the total trade receivables balance (see revenue by segment information in Note 29); however, credit risk is considered to be limited due to historical performance and ongoing assessments of customer credit and liquidity positions. Annual Report 2021 117 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 10 Derivative financial instruments Embedded derivatives – contract to issue warrants In June 2020, the Group restructured the terms of its borrowings with its lenders. These terms included warrants to be issued to its lenders if GMS had not raised US$ 75.0 million of equity by no later than 31 December 2020. As this term was not expected to be met, an embedded derivative liability was recognised for the obligation to issue the warrants. At 31 December 2020, this had a value of US$ 1.4 million, which had increased to US$ 1.8 million by March 2021. In March 2021, the Group amended the terms of its loan facility, as mentioned in Note 21, and additional time was granted to raise equity before warrants were required to be issued to its lenders. The previous obligation to issue warrants to the bank was waived, and a contingent requirement to issue warrants to banks was introduced. The amended terms required US$ 25.0 million of equity to be raised by 31 December 2021 otherwise the Group would be in default, and a further US$ 50.0 million to be raised by 31 December 2022. GMS was subsequently successful with the requirement to raise the first tranche of equity (Refer to Note 12). As the new terms of the loan facility contained separate distinguishable terms with a contingent requirement to issue warrants to banks, management determined the debt facility to contain an embedded derivative. The Group was required to recognise the embedded derivative at fair value. Management commissioned an independent valuation expert to measure the fair value of the warrants, which was determined using Monte Carlo simulations. The simulation considers sensitivity by building models of possible results by substituting a range of values. This represents a Level 3 fair value measurement under the IFRS 13 hierarchy. The fair value of the liability as at 31 December 2021 was US$ 0.7 million (31 December 2020 US$ 1.4 million). As the derivative was due to be settled after 12 months, the balance is recognised as a non-current liability. The Group successfully concluded a US$ 27.8 million equity raise in June 2021 which prevented an event of default on its loan facilities. Under these facilities, the Group is required to raise a further US$ 50 million of equity by the end of 2022 or issue 87.6 million warrants entitling the Group’s banks to acquire 132 million shares, or 11.5% of the share capital of the Company, for a total consideration of GBP £7.9 million, or 6.0p per share. Warrant holders will have the right to exercise there warrants up to the end of the term of the loan facility being 30 June 2025. The loan facility was a tri-partite agreement between the Company, a subsidiary of the Group and the Groups banking syndicate. As the embedded derivative was over the Company’s equity, the balance has been recorded on the Company’s balance sheet. Interest Rate Swap The Group entered into an Interest Rate Swap (IRS) on 30 June 2018 to hedge a notional amount of US$ 50.0 million. The remaining notional amount hedged under the IRS as at 31 December 2021 was US$ 30.8 million (31 December 2020: US$ 38.4 million). The IRS hedges the risk of variability in interest payments by converting a floating rate liability to a fixed rate liability. The fair value of the IRS as at 31 December 2021 was a liability value of US$ 1.1 million (31 December 2020: US$ 2.4 million). As cashflows of the hedging relationship were not highly probable in 2020 hedge accounting was discontinued. The net revaluation gain in the period to 31 December 2021 of US$ 0.1 million was accordingly recognised in the income statement, together with a US$ 0.1 million loss in respect of amounts recycled from the cash flow hedge reserve (Note 36). The fair value measurement of the interest rate swap was determined by independent valuers with reference to quoted market prices, discounted cash flow models and recognised pricing models as appropriate. They represent Level 2 fair value measurements under the IFRS 13 hierarchy. IFRS 13 fair value hierarchy Apart from the contract to issue warrants, the Group has no other financial instruments that are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy in the current year that are determined by reference to significant unobservable inputs. In the previous year, the contract to issue warrants was recognised at level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy. There are no non-recurring fair value measurements. Derivative financial instruments are made up as follows: At 1 January 2021 Loss on settlement of derivatives Net gain on changes in fair value of interest rate swap Derecognition of embedded derivative warrants Initial recognition of embedded derivative Net loss on changes in fair value of embedded derivative As at 31 December 2021 Interest rate swap US$’000 Cross currency interest rate swap US$’000 Embedded derivative US$’000 (2,387) 1,033 278 – – – (1,076) – – – – – – – (1,449) – – 1,890 (926) (232) (717) Total US$’000 (3,836) 1,033 278 1,890 (926) (232) (1,793) 118 Gulf Marine Services PLC At 1 January 2020 Gain on fair value changes of hedging instruments Gain/(loss) on settlement of derivatives Net loss on changes in fair value of interest rate swap Initial recognition of embedded derivative Net loss on changes in fair value of embedded derivative As at 31 December 2020 Interest rate swap US$’000 Cross currency interest rate swap US$’000 Embedded derivative US$’000 (1,737) – 901 (1,551) – – (2,387) (3) 21 (18) – – – – – – – – (1,386) (63) (1,449) Total US$’000 (1,740) 21 883 (1,551) (1,386) (63) (3,836) These statements include the cost of hedging reserve and cash flow hedge reserve which are detailed further in the consolidated statement of changes in equity. These reserves are non- distributable. 11 Cash and cash equivalents Interest bearing Held in UAE banks Non-interest bearing Held in UAE banks Held in banks outside UAE Total cash at bank and in hand 12 Share capital Ordinary shares at £0.02 per share At 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2021 Placing of new shares Capital reorganisation As at 31 December 2021 Deferred shares at £0.08 per share At 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2021 Capital reorganisation As at 31 December 2021 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 639 55 778 6,854 8,271 1,026 2,717 3,798 Number of ordinary shares (Thousands) 350,488 665,927 – 1,016,415 Number of ordinary shares (Thousands) – 350,488 350,488 Ordinary shares US$’000 58,057 18,505 (46,445) 30,117 Ordinary shares US$’000 – 46,445 46,445 Prior to an equity raise on 28 June 2021, the Group underwent a capital reorganisation where all existing ordinary shares with a nominal value of 10p per share were subdivided and re-designated into 1 ordinary share with a nominal value of 2p and 1 deferred share with a nominal value of 8p each. The previously recognised share capital balance relating to the old 10p ordinary shares was allocated pro rata to the new subdivided 2p ordinary shares and 8p deferred shares. The deferred shares have no voting rights and no right to the profits generated by the Group. On winding-up or other return of capital, the holders of deferred shares have extremely limited rights. The Group has the right but not the obligation to buy back all of the Deferred Shares for an amount not exceeding £1.00 in aggregate without obtaining the sanction of the holder or holders of the Deferred Shares. As there is no contractual obligation, management do not consider there to be a liability. As part of the equity raise on 28 June 2021, the Company issued 665,926,795 new ordinary shares with a nominal value of 2p per share at 3p per share with the additional pence per share being recognised in the share premium account. Issue costs amounting to US$ 3.2 million (31 December 2020: US$ nil) have been deducted from the share premium account. Annual Report 2021 119 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 13 Restricted reserve The restricted reserve of US$ 0.3 million (2020: US$ 0.3 million) represents the statutory reserve of certain subsidiaries. As required by the UAE Commercial Companies Law, 10% of profit for the year is transferred to the statutory reserve until the reserve equals 50% of the share capital. This reserve is not available for distribution. No amounts were transferred to this reserve during either of the years shown. 14 Group restructuring reserve The Group restructuring reserve arose on consolidation under the pooling of interests (merger accounting) method used for the Group restructuring. Under this method, the Group was treated as a continuation of GMS Global Commercial Investments LLC (the predecessor parent Company) and its subsidiaries. At the date the Company became the new parent Company of the Group via a share-for-share exchange, the difference between the share capital of GMS Global Commercial Investments LLC and the Company, amounting to US$ 49.7 million, was recorded in the books of Gulf Marine Services PLC as a Group restructuring reserve. This reserve is non-distributable. 15 Share based payment reserve Share based payment reserve of US$ 3.6 million (2020: US$ 3.7 million) relates to awards granted to employees under the long-term incentive plans (Note 27). 16 Capital contribution The capital contribution reserve is as follows: At 31 December 2021 US$’000 9,177 2020 US$’000 9,177 During 2013, US$ 7.8 million was transferred from share appreciation rights payable to capital contribution as, effective 1 January 2013, the shareholders have assumed the obligation to settle the share appreciation rights. An additional charge in respect of this scheme of US$ 1.4 million was made in 2014. The total balance of US$ 9.2 million is not available for distribution. 17 Translation reserve and Retained earnings Foreign currency translation reserve represents differences on foreign currency net investments arising from the re-translation of the net investments in overseas subsidiaries. Retained earnings include the accumulated realised and certain unrealised gains and losses made by the Group. 18 Non-controlling interests The movement in non-controlling interests is summarised as follows: At 1 January Share of profit for the year At 31 December 2021 US$’000 1,694 218 1,912 2020 US$’000 1,659 35 1,694 19 Provision for employees’ end of service benefits In accordance with UAE and Saudi Arabia Labour Laws, the Group is required to provide for end of service benefits for certain employees. The movement in the provision for employees’ end of service benefits during the year was as follows: At 1 January Provided during the year Paid during the year At 31 December 20 Trade and other payables Trade payables Due to a related party (Note 23) Accrued expenses Deferred revenue VAT payable Other payables 2021 US$’000 2,190 678 (546) 2,322 2021 US$’000 8,767 197 9,023 593 875 – 19,455 2020 US$’000 2,280 527 (617) 2,190 2020 US$’000 12,251 188 8,449 357 943 1,207 23,395 The average credit period on purchases is 194 days (2020: 152 days). No interest is payable on the outstanding balances. Trade and other payables are all current liabilities. 120 Gulf Marine Services PLC 21 Bank borrowings Secured borrowings at amortised cost are as follows: Term loans Working capital facility Bank borrowings are split between hedged and unhedged amounts as follows; Hedged bank borrowing via Interest Rate Swap* Unhedged bank borrowings 2021 US$’000 358,026 21,500 379,526 2021 US$’000 30,769 348,757 379,526 2020 US$’000 388,533 21,500 410,033 2020 US$’000 38,462 371,571 410,033 * This is an economic hedge and not accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9, Financial Instruments. The Group uses an IRS to hedge a portion of the Group’s floating rate liability by converting LIBOR to a fixed rate. Refer to Note 26 for further details. Bank borrowings are presented in the consolidated statement of financial position as follows: Non-current portion Bank borrowings Current portion Bank borrowings – scheduled repayments within one year 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 353,429 379,009 26,097 379,526 31,024 410,033 As noted in the 2020 annual report, on 31 December 2020, the Group’s banking syndicate agreed to extend certain obligations on the Group, which it was otherwise required to have met, including the requirement to issue warrants to banks and accrue Payment in Kind (PIK) interest. This meant the Group was not in an event of default as at 31 December 2020. This was further extended on 27 January 2021 and 25 February 2021. As the waivers received led to revisions to the timing of payments, management assessed the fair value of the remaining cashflows. On 31 March 2021, the Group amended the terms of its loan facility with its banking syndicate. The amended terms (see below) were significantly different compared to the original loan. Management determined that the Group’s loan facility was substantially modified and accordingly the old loan facility was extinguished, and the new facility recognised. A net gain of US$ 6.3 million (2020: US$ 1.1 million) was recognised in the profit and loss (Note 36) reflecting the waiver of PIK interest otherwise payable during the first quarter of 2021, the remeasurement of the debt to fair value as at the date of the substantial modification, and the impact of a change in the forecast voluntary repayment of the debt. US$ 3.2 million of costs incurred in renegotiating the new facility were expensed (2020: US$ 15.8 million). The remeasurement of the bank borrowings was determined in accordance with generally accepted principles based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using appropriate effective interest rates. The principal terms of the outstanding facility as at 31 December 2021 are as follows: • The facility’s main currency is US$ and is repayable with a margin at 3% up to 31 December 2022 at which point margin is based on a ratchet depending on leverage levels (2020: margin ratchet based on leverage levels) and final maturity in June 2025 (31 December 2020: June 2025). • The revolving working capital facility amounts to US$ 50.0 million. US$ 25.0 million of the working capital facility is allocated to performance bonds and guarantees and US$ 25.0 million is allocated to cash of which US$ 21.5 million was drawn as at 31 December 2021 (31 December 2020: US$ 21.5 million), leaving US$ 3.5 million available for drawdown (31 December 2020: US$ 3.5 million). There was a reduction to the cash element of the working capital facility by US$ 5 million to US$ 20 million on 31st March 2022. A payment of US$ 5 million was made by the Group on the same day reducing the amount utilised to US$ 16.5 million, leaving US$ 3.5 million available for drawdown as at 31 March 2022. The working capital facility expires alongside the main debt facility in June 2025. • The facility remains secured by mortgages over its whole fleet, with a net book value at 31 December 2021 of US$ 560.9 million (31 December 2020: US$ 558.6 million) (Note 5). Additionally, gross trade receivables, amounting to US$ 43.0 million (31 December 2020: US$ 24.2 million) have been assigned as security against the loans extended by the Group’s banking syndicate (Note 9). • The Group has also provided security against gross cash balances, being cash balances amounting to US$ 8.3 million (31 December 2020: US$ 3.8 million) (Note 11) before the restricted amounts related to visa deposits held with the Ministry of Labour in the UAE of US$ 39k (2020: US$ 95k) included in trade and other receivables (see deposits in Note 9), which have been assigned as security against the loans extended by the Group’s banking syndicate. Annual Report 2021 121 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 21 Bank borrowings continued • The amended terms contain contingent conditions such that if an equity raise of US$ 75.0 million in aggregate does not take place by 31 December 2022, PIK interest would potentially accrue, only if leverage is above 4.0x and warrants would be due to the banking syndicate, refer to Note 10 for details of the valuation of the contract to issue warrants. The facility is subject to certain financial covenants including; Debt Service Cover; Interest Cover; and Net Leverage Ratio; which are tested bi-annually in June and December. As at 31 December 2021 the Group were required to achieve a net leverage ratio lower than 6.1x, interest cover with a minimum ratio of 1.2x and service cover with a minimum ratio of 2.5x. There are also additional covenants relating to general and administrative costs, capital expenditure and Security Cover (loan to value) which are tested annually in December. In addition, there are restrictions to payment of dividends until the net leverage ratio falls below 4.0 times. All financial covenants assigned to the Group’s debt facility, described above were met as of 31 December 2021. Management considers the carrying amount of the Group’s bank borrowings approximates it’s fair value as at 31 December 2021. 31 December 2021: Term loan – scheduled repayments within one year Term loan – scheduled repayments within more than one year Working capital facility – scheduled repayment more than Outstanding amount Current US$’000 Non-current US$’000 Total US$’000 Security Maturity 26,097 – – 331,929 26,097 331,929 Secured Secured June 2025 June 2025 one year – 21,500 21,500 Secured June 2025 26,097 353,429 379,526 31 December 2020: Term loan – scheduled repayments within one year Term loan – scheduled repayments within more than one year Working capital facility – scheduled repayment within one year 9,524 – 21,500 31,024 – 379,009 – 379,009 9,524 379,009 21,500 410,033 Secured Secured June 2025 June 2025 Secured June 2025 2021 US$’000 3,311 1,955 147 (2,342) (147) 2,924 1,817 736 206 165 2,924 1,817 1,107 2,924 2020 US$’000 1,954 3,239 182 (1,871) (193) 3,311 1,739 826 746 – 3,311 1,739 1,572 3,311 22 Lease liabilities As at 1 January Recognition of new lease liability additions Interest on finance leases (Note 36) Principal elements of lease payments Interest paid As at 31 December Maturity analysis: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 – 5 Onwards Split between: Current Non-current 122 Gulf Marine Services PLC 23 Related party transactions Related parties comprise the Group’s major shareholders, Directors and entities related to them, companies under common ownership and/ or common management and control, their partners and key management personnel. Pricing policies and terms of related party transactions are approved by the Group’s Board. Balances and transactions between the Group and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Key management personnel: As at 31 December 2021, there were 2.2 million shares held by Directors (31 December 2020: nil). Refer to the Governance Report on page 71. Related parties The Group’s principal subsidiaries are outlined in Note 3. The related parties comprising of the Group’s major shareholders are outlined in the Directors Report on page 76. The other related party during the year was: Partner in relation to Saudi Operations Relationship Abdulla Fouad Energy Services Company Minority shareholder in GMS Saudi Arabia Ltd. Partner in relation to UAE Operations National Catering Company Limited WLL Affiliate of a significant shareholder of the Company The amounts outstanding to Abdulla Fouad Energy Services Company as at 31 December 2021 was US$ 0.1 million (2020: US$ 0.2 million), refer to Note 20. The amounts outstanding to National Catering Company Limited WLL as at 31 December 2021 was US$ 0.1 million (2020: US$ nil) included in trade and other payables (Note 20). Significant transactions with the related party during the year: Rentals property from Abdulla Fouad Rentals of breathing equipment from Abdulla Fouad Catering services for Vessel Pepper from National Catering Company Limited WLL Compensation of key management personnel The remuneration of Directors and other members of key management personnel during the year were as follows: Short-term benefits End of service benefits Share based payment charge (LTIPs) Termination payments 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 54 452 289 54 524 – 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 915 7 – – 922 1,165 94 141 1,161 2,561 Compensation of key management personnel represents the charge to the profit or loss in respect of the remuneration of the executive and non-executive Directors. At 31 December 2021, there were five members of key management personnel (2020: four members). During 2020, the Board was replaced; the previous Board’s remuneration is included in the disclosure above for 2020. Further details of Board remuneration and the termination of key management personnel are contained in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on page 69. 24 Contingent liabilities At 31 December 2021, the banks acting for Gulf Marine Services FZE, one of the subsidiaries of the Group, had issued bid bonds, performance bonds and labour guarantees amounting to US$ 11.6 million (2020: US$ 15.9 million) all of which were counter-indemnified by other subsidiaries of the Group. Annual Report 2021 123 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 25 Commitments Capital commitments 2021 US$’000 6,832 2020 US$’000 7,470 Capital commitments comprise mainly capital expenditure, which has been contractually agreed with suppliers for future periods for equipment or the upgrade of existing vessels. 26 Financial instruments Categories of financial instruments Financial assets: Current assets at amortised cost: Cash and cash equivalents (Note 11) Trade receivables and other receivables (Note 9)* Total financial assets * Trade and other receivables excludes prepayments and advances to suppliers. Financial liabilities: Derivatives recorded at FVTPL: Interest rate swap (Note 10) Embedded derivative (Note 10) Financial liabilities recorded at amortised cost: Trade and other payables (Note 20*) Lease liabilities (Note 22) Current bank borrowings – scheduled repayments within one year (Note 21) Non-current bank borrowings – scheduled repayments more than one year (Note 21) Total financial liabilities * Trade and other payables excludes amounts of deferred revenue and VAT payable. 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 8,271 44,446 52,717 3,798 26,682 30,480 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 1,076 717 2,387 1,449 17,987 2,924 26,097 353,429 402,230 22,095 3,311 31,024 379,009 439,275 The following table combines information about the following; • Fair values of financial instruments (except financial instruments when carrying amount approximates their fair value); and • Fair value hierarchy levels of financial liabilities for which fair value was disclosed. Financial liabilities: Recognised at level 2 of the fair value hierarchy: Interest rate swap (Note 10) Embedded derivative (Note 10) Recognised at level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: Embedded derivative (Note 10) 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 1,076 – 2,387 1,449 717 – The following table provides information about the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in the most significant inputs: Description Valuation technique Significant unobservable input Sensitivity of the fair value measurement to input Embedded derivative Monte-Carlo Equity raise or warrant issue simulation technique The valuation methodology assumes warrants are issued and vest whenever sufficient equity is not raised, and sufficient equity is assumed to be raised whenever market capitalisation exceeds US$ 75 million in a Monte Carlo simulation with 5,000 iterations for Group’s future market capitalisation. As a result of this assumption, there are 2,797 iterations out of 5,000 where warrants are issued and vest, and 2,203 iterations where sufficient equity is raised. The fair value of financial instruments classified as level 3 are, in certain circumstances, measured using valuation techniques that incorporate assumptions that are not evidenced by the prices from observable current market transactions in the same instrument and are not based on observable market data. 124 Gulf Marine Services PLC The fair value of the Group’s embedded derivative at 31 December 2021 has been arrived at on the basis of a valuation carried out at that date by a third- party expert, an independent valuer not connected with the Group. The valuation conforms to International Valuation Standards. The fair value was determined using a Monte-Carlo simulation with 5,000 iterations of which 54% of iterations had warrants being issued and 46% had an equity raise taking place by 31 December 2022. Favourable and unfavourable changes in the value of financial instruments are determined on the basis of changes in the value of the instruments as a result of varying the levels of the unobservable parameters, quantification of which is judgmental. There have been no transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 during the years ended 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020. The Group uses interest rate swap derivatives to hedge volatility in interest rates. These were previously formally designated into hedge accounting relationships. As disclosed in the 2019 annual report, the Group’s banks agreed to waive the testing requirement of all covenants for the December 2019 testing date. As the cashflows of the hedging relationship subsequent to 31 December 2020 were not highly probable, the hedge discontinued in 2020 and the interest rate swap was reclassified to fair value through profit and loss. As a result, a gain of US$ 0.3 million (2020: loss of US$ 1.6 million) was recognised in relation to the change in fair value of the interest rate swap in the current year (Note 36). Capital risk management The Group manages its capital to support its ability to continue as a going concern while maximising the return on equity. The Group does not have a formalised optimal target capital structure or target ratios in connection with its capital risk management objectives, however under the revised banking terms signed in March 2021, a minimum of US$ 75 million has to be raised prior to 31 December 2022 in order to accelerate payments towards term debt. The capital structure of the Group consists of net bank debt and total equity. The Group will look to delever the Company as well as maximise cash wherever possible over the coming years. Significant accounting policies Details of the significant accounting policies and methods adopted, including the criteria for recognition, the basis of measurement and the basis on which income and expenses are recognised, in respect of each class of financial asset, financial liability and equity instrument are disclosed in Note 3 to the financial statements. Financial risk management objectives The Group is exposed to the following risks related to financial instruments – credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. Management actively monitors and manages these financial risks relating to the Group. In December 2020 an agreement was reached between the United Kingdom (“UK”) and the European Union (“EU”) for the UK to exit the EU (“Brexit”). The Group has considered the risks arising from Brexit and on amounts presented in these consolidated financial statements. As the majority of the Group’s operations and our lending syndicate are in the Middle East, our UK office was closed at the end of 2019 and there is currently one vessel working in North West Europe, the exposure is not considered to be significant beyond the foreign currency risk described later. Credit risk management Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group, and arises principally from the Group’s trade and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents. The Group has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties which have been determined based on information available and other financial analysis, such that significant revenue is generated by dealing with high profile well known customers, for whom the credit risk is assessed to be suitably low. The Group attempts to control credit risk by monitoring credit exposures, limiting transactions with specific non-related counterparties, and continually assessing the creditworthiness of such non-related counterparties. Cash balances held with banks are assessed to have low credit risk of default since these banks are highly regulated by the central banks of the respective countries. At the year-end, cash at bank and in hand totalled US$ 8.3 million (2020: US$ 3.8 million), deposited with banks with Fitch short-term ratings of F2 to F1+ (Refer to Note 11). Concentration of credit risk arises when a number of counterparties are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic, political or other conditions. Concentration of credit risk indicates the relative sensitivity of the Group’s performance to developments affecting a particular industry or geographic location. During the year, vessels were chartered to ten Middle East and two international companies, including international oil companies and engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) contractors. At 31 December 2021, 8 companies accounted for 96% (2020: 10 companies accounted for 99%) of the outstanding trade receivables. The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because the funds are held by banks with high credit ratings assigned by international agencies. The amount that best represents maximum credit risk exposure on financial assets at the end of the reporting period, in the event counterparties failing to perform their obligations generally approximates their carrying value. The Group considers cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables which are neither past due nor impaired to have a low credit risk and an internal rating of ‘performing’. Performing is defined as a counterparty that has a strong financial position and which there are no past due amounts. Annual Report 2021 125 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 26 Financial instruments continued Liquidity risk management Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of Directors. The Group manages liquidity risk by seeking to maintain sufficient facilities to ensure availability of funds for forecast and actual cash flow requirements. The table below summarises the maturity profile of the Group’s financial liabilities. The contractual maturities of the Group’s financial liabilities have been determined on the basis of the remaining period at the end of the reporting period to the contractual maturity date. The maturity profile is monitored by management to assist in ensuring adequate liquidity is maintained. Refer to Going Concern in Note 3. The maturity profile of the assets and liabilities at the end of the reporting period based on contractual repayment arrangements was as follows: Interest rate Total US$’000 1 to 3 months US$’000 4 to 12 months US$’000 2 to 5 years US$’000 31 December 2021 Non-interest bearing financial assets Cash and cash equivalents- non-interest bearing Trade receivables and other receivables* Interest bearing financial assets Cash and cash equivalents- interest bearing Non-interest bearing financial liabilities Trade and other payables** Interest bearing financial liabilities Bank borrowings- principal Interest on bank borrowings Lease liabilities Interest on lease liabilities Interest rate swap 7,632 44,446 639 52,717 7,632 41,208 639 49,479 – 670 – 670 – 2,568 – 2,568 3.0%–3.3% 17,987 17,987 – – 379,526 34,907 2,205 104 1,076 435,805 Total US$’000 3,743 26,682 55 30,480 6,524 2,898 440 20 – 27,869 1 to 3 months US$’000 3,743 24,415 55 28,213 19,573 8,378 925 42 – 28,918 4 to 12 months US$’000 – 3 – – 3 – 7,500 15,499 1,340 89 – 24,428 353,429 23,631 840 42 1,076 379,018 2 to 5 years US$’000 – 2,264 – – 2,264 – 432,295 57,155 1,669 97 2,387 493,603 Interest rate 31 December 2020 Non-interest bearing financial assets Cash and cash equivalents- non-interest bearing Trade and other receivables* Interest bearing financial assets Cash and cash equivalents- interest bearing Non-interest bearing financial liabilities Trade and other payables** Interest bearing financial liabilities Bank borrowings- principal Interest on bank borrowings Lease liabilities Interest on lease liabilities Interest rate swap 5.2%–7.0% 22,095 22,095 463,795 77,705 3,536 226 2,387 569,744 24,000 5,051 527 40 – 51,713 * Trade and other receivables excludes prepayments and advances to suppliers. ** Trade and other payables excludes amounts of deferred revenue and VAT payable. 126 Gulf Marine Services PLC Interest rate risk management The Group is exposed to cash flow interest rate risk on its bank borrowings which are subject to floating interest rates. The Group uses an IRS to hedge a notional amount of US$ 50 million (2020: US$ 50.0 million). The remaining amount of notional hedged from the IRS as at 31 December 2021 was US$ 30.8 million (2020: US$ 38.5 million). The IRS hedges the risk of variability in interest payments by converting a floating rate liability to a fixed rate liability. The fair value of the IRS as at 31 December 2021 was a liability value of US$ 1.1 million (2020: US$ 2.4 million), (see Note 10 for more details). As noted above the hedge discontinued on 1 January 2020 and the interest rate swap was reclassified to fair value through profit and loss. Interest Rate Benchmark Reform The key risks for the Group arising from the transition are: Interest rate basis risk: There are two elements to this risk as outlined below: • If the bilateral negotiations with the Group’s counterparties are not successfully concluded before the cessation of IBORs, there are significant uncertainties with regard to the interest rate that would apply. This gives rise to additional interest rate risk that was not anticipated when the contracts were entered into and is not captured by our interest rate risk management strategy. For example, in some cases the fallback clauses in IBOR loan contracts may result in the interest rate becoming fixed for the remaining term at the last IBOR quote. The Group is working closely with all counterparties to avoid this from occurring, however if this does arise, the Group’s interest rate risk management policy will apply as normal and may result in closing out or entering into new interest rate swaps to maintain the mix of floating rate and fixed rate debt. Interest rate risk basis may arise if a non-derivative instrument and the derivative instrument held to manage the interest risk on the non-derivative instrument transition to alternative benchmark rates at different times. This risk may also arise where back-to-back derivatives transition at different times. The Group will monitor this risk against its risk management policy which has been updated to allow for temporary mismatches of up to 12 months and transact additional basis interest rate swaps if required. • Liquidity risk: There are fundamental differences between IBORs and the various alternative benchmark rates which the Group will be adopting. IBORs are forward looking term rates published for a period (e.g. 3 months) at the beginning of that period and include an inter- bank credit spread, whereas alternative benchmark rates are typically risk free overnight rates published at the end of the overnight period with no embedded credit spread. These differences will result in additional uncertainty regarding floating rate interest payments which will require additional liquidity management. The Group’s liquidity risk management policy has been updated to ensure sufficient liquid resources to accommodate unexpected increases in overnight rates. Accounting: If transition to alternative benchmark rates for certain contracts is finalised in a manner that does not permit the application of the reliefs introduced in the Phase 2 amendments, this could lead to increased volatility in profit or loss if re-designated hedges are not fully effective and volatility in the profit or loss if non-derivative financial instruments are modified or derecognised. The Group is aiming to agree changes to contracts that would allow IFRS 9 reliefs to apply. In particular, the Group is not seeking to novate derivatives or close out derivatives and enter into new on-market derivatives where derivatives have been designated in hedging relationships. Litigation risk: If no agreement is reached to implement the interest rate benchmark reform on existing contracts, (e.g. arising from differing interpretation of existing fallback terms), there is a risk of prolonged disputes with counterparties which could give rise to additional legal and other costs. The Group is working closely with all counterparties to avoid this from occurring. Operational risk: Our current treasury management processes are being updated to fully manage the transition to alternative benchmark rates and there is a risk that such upgrades are not fully functional in time, resulting in additional manual procedures which give rise to operational risks. The Group has developed workstreams to ensure the relevant updates are made in good time and the Group has plans in place for alternative manual procedures with relevant controls to address any potential delay. Progress towards implementation of alternative benchmark interest rates The Group has been in ongoing discussions with its lenders in relation to transition to alternative benchmark rates. This is the case for both its bank borrowings and interest rate swap. Foreign currency risk management The majority of the Group’s transactions are denominated in UAE Dirhams, Euros, US Dollars and Pound Sterling. As the UAE Dirham and Saudi Riyal are pegged to the US Dollar, balances in UAE Dirham and Saudi Riyals are not considered to represent significant currency risk. Transactions in other foreign currencies entered into by the Group are short-term in nature and therefore management considers that the currency risk associated with these transactions is limited. Brexit has not had any material impact on Group operations or gave exposure to transactions in Pound Sterling. Management continue to monitor changes in legislation and future policies and will develop suitable mitigants if required. Annual Report 2021 127 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 26 Financial instruments continued Foreign currency risk management continued The carrying amounts of the Group’s significant foreign currency denominated monetary assets include cash and cash equivalents and trade receivables and liabilities include trade payables. The amounts at the reporting date are as follows: US Dollars UAE Dirhams Saudi Riyals Pound Sterling Euros Qatari Riyals Norwegian Krone Others Assets 31 December Liabilities 31 December 2021 US$’000 35,097 87 7,688 4,189 89 3,264 – – 50,414 2020 US$’000 19,193 103 6,719 315 23 1,652 – – 28,005 2021 US$’000 4,889 2,092 553 948 196 86 2 1 8,767 2020 US$’000 6,239 3,347 738 1,054 535 210 126 2 12,251 At 31 December 2021, if the exchange rate of the currencies other than the UAE Dirham and Saudi Riyal had increased/decreased by 10% against the US Dollar, with all other variables held constant, the Group’s profit/(loss) for the year would have been higher/lower by US$ 0.6 million (2020: higher/lower by US$ nil) mainly as a result of foreign exchange loss or gain on translation of Euro and Pound Sterling denominated balances. 27 Long term incentive plans The Group has Long Term Incentive Plans (“LTIPs”) which were granted to senior management, managers and senior offshore officers. From 2019 onwards the employment condition is that each eligible employee of the Company must remain in employment during the three-year vesting period. LTIPs have been aligned to the Company’s share performance therefore only financial metrics will be applied. EPS (“Earnings Per Share”) has been dropped as the financial metric. In the prior years until 2018, the release of these shares was conditional upon continued employment, certain market vesting conditions and in the case of senior management LTIP awards, performance against three-year target EPS compound annual growth rates. Equity-settled share-based payments were measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined, using the Binomial Probability Model together with Monte Carlo simulations, at the grant date of equity-settled share-based payments, is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on an estimate of the number of shares that will ultimately vest. The fair value of each award was determined by taking into account the market performance condition, the term of the award, the share price at grant date, the expected price volatility of the underlying share and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the award. Non-market vesting conditions, which for the Company mainly related to the continual employment of the employee during the vesting period, and in the case of the senior management, until 2018 as noted above, achievement of EPS growth targets, were taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each balance sheet date. The cumulative amount recognised over the vesting period was based on the number of awards that eventually vest. Any market vesting conditions were factored into the fair value of the share-based payment granted. To the extent that share-based payments are granted to employees of the Group’s subsidiaries without charge, the share-based payment is capitalised as part of the cost of investment in subsidiaries. The number of share awards granted by the Group during the year is given in the table below: At the beginning of the year Granted in the year Cash settled in the year Forfeited in the year At the end of the year 2021 000’s 6,573,229 – (1,854,298) (2,219,217) 2020 000’s 8,768,294 2,661,388 – (4,856,453) 2,499,714 6,573,229 The weighted average remaining contractual life for the vesting period outstanding as at 31 December 2021 was 0.5 years (31 December 2020: 1.0 years). The weighted average fair value of shares granted during the year ended 31 December 2021 was US$ nil (31 December 2020: US$ 0.10). 128 Gulf Marine Services PLC 128 Gulf Marine Services PLC Grant date Share price Expected volatility Risk-free rate Expected dividend yield Vesting period Award life LTIP LTIP 29 May 2020 15 November 2019 £0.08 102.79% 0.48% 0.00% 3 years 3 years £0.09 120% 0.01% 0.00% 3 years 3 years The expected share price volatility of Gulf Marine Services PLC shares was determined taking into account the historical share price movements for a three-year period up to the grant date (and of each of the companies in the comparator group). The risk-free return was determined from similarly dated zero coupon UK government bonds at the time the share awards were granted, using historical information taken from the Bank of England’s records. On 15 March 2021, the Remuneration Committee determined that awards granted on 28 March 2018 which were due to vest on 28 March 2021 would be settled in cash, not by the issue of shares as was contractually stipulated, subject to the achievement of the original performance conditions. For the purposes of IFRS 2, this represented a reclassification of these awards from equity-settled to cash-settled. In accordance with IFRS 2, at the date of reclassification a balance of US$ 0.1 million equal to the fair value of the awards at the modification date was deducted from equity. As the fair value at the modification date was lower than the cumulative equity-settled share-based payment charge at that date, no adjustment was made to profit or loss as a result of the modifications. On 9 June 2021, the Company’s Ordinary Shares of 10p each were split into Ordinary Shares of 2p each and deferred shares of 8p each. A consequence of this change will be that the share options issued in prior years will be modified to such that the recipients are granted Ordinary Shares of 2p each, not Ordinary Shares of 10p each. This change represented a modification of the share-based payments for the purposes of IFRS 2. However, as the modification did not result in a favourable change for the employees, no adjustments to the share-based payment charge was required as a result of the change to the Company’s share capital. 28 Dividends There was no dividend declared or paid in 2021 (2020: nil). No final dividend in respect of the year ended 31 December 2021 is to be proposed at the 2022 AGM. During the year ended 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2018, the Group’s subsidiaries declared a dividend of US$ 0.3 and US$ 0.3 million, respectively, to non-controlling interests. Both these dividends were paid during 2020. 29 Segment reporting Management have identified that the Directors and senior management team are the chief operating decision makers in accordance with the requirements of IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’. Segment performance is assessed based upon adjusted gross profit/(loss), which represents gross profit/(loss) before depreciation and amortisation and loss on impairment of assets. The reportable segments have been identified by Directors and senior management based on the size and type of asset in operation. The operating and reportable segments of the Group are (i) K-Class vessels, which include the Kamikaze, Kikuyu, Kawawa, Kudeta, Keloa and Pepper vessels (ii) S-Class vessels, which include the Shamal, Scirocco and Sharqi vessels, (iii) E-Class vessels, which include the Endeavour, Endurance, Enterprise and Evolution vessels, and (iv) Other vessels, considered non-core assets, which does not form part of the K-, S- or E-Class vessels segments. The composition of the Other vessels segment, which are non-core assets, was amended in 2018. All of these operating segments earn revenue related to the hiring of vessels and related services including charter hire income, messing and accommodation services, personnel hire and hire of equipment. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the Group’s accounting policies described in Note 3. Annual Report 2021 129 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 29 Segment reporting continued K-Class vessels E-Class vessels S-Class vessels Other vessels Less: Depreciation charged to cost of sales Amortisation charged to cost of sales Reversal of impairment/(impairment loss) Gross profit/(loss) Other general and administrative expenses Finance expense Foreign exchange loss, net Other income Finance income Restructuring costs Exceptional legal costs Loss on disposal of property and equipment Gain on disposal of assets held for sale Profit/(loss) for the year before taxation Revenue Segment adjusted gross profit/(loss) 2021 US$’000 43,027 38,680 33,420 – 115,127 2020 US$’000 40,947 29,407 32,136 2 102,492 2021 US$’000 26,214 25,104 22,590 – 73,908 (22,738) (5,503) 14,959 60,626 (12,272) (14,463) (1,002) 28 9 – – – – 2020 US$’000 25,349 12,676 22,210 (10) 60,225 (25,524) (3,073) (87,156) (55,528) (12,632) (46,740) (993) 257 15 (2,492) (3,092) (2,073) 259 32,926 (123,019) The total revenue from reportable segments which comprises the K-, S- and E-Class vessels was US$ 115.1 million (2020: US$ 102.5 million). The Other vessels segment does not constitute a reportable segment per IFRS 8 Operating Segments. Segment revenue reported above represents revenue generated from external customers. There were no inter-segment sales in the years. Segment assets and liabilities, including depreciation, amortisation and additions to non-current assets, are not reported to the chief operating decision makers on a segmental basis and are therefore not disclosed. Information about major customers During the year, four customers (2020: two) individually accounted for more than 10% of the Group’s revenues. The related revenue figures for these major customers, the identity of which may vary by year was US$ 13.4 million, US$ 16.6 million, US$ 42.0 million and US$ 18.6 million (2020: US$ 39.3 million and US$ 17.7 million). The revenue from these customers is attributable to the E-Class vessels, S-Class vessels and K-Class vessels reportable segments. Geographical segments Revenue by geographical segment is based on the geographical location of the customer as shown below. 2021 US$’000 58,019 21,376 22,591 101,986 10,392 2,749 13,141 115,127 2020 US$’000 53,363 17,745 19,047 90,155 5,353 6,984 12,337 102,492 United Arab Emirates Saudi Arabia Qatar Total – Middle East and North Africa United Kingdom Rest of Europe Total – Europe Worldwide Total 130 Gulf Marine Services PLC Type of work The Group operates in both the oil and gas and renewables sector. Oil and gas revenues are driven from both client operating cost expenditure and capex expenditure. Renewables are primarily driven by windfarm developments from client expenditure. Details are shown below. Oil and Gas Renewables Total 2021 US$’000 101,986 13,141 115,127 2020 US$’000 90,196 12,296 102,492 A reversal of impairment of US$ 15.0 million (2020: impairment of US$ 87.2 million) was recognised in respect of property and equipment (Note 5). These (reversal of impairments)/impairment charge were attributable to the following reportable segments: K-Class vessels S-Class vessels E-Class vessels Other vessels 2021 Depreciation charged to cost of sales Amortisation charged to cost of sales Reversal of impairment charge 2020 Depreciation charged to cost of sales Amortisation charged to cost of sales Impairment charge 2021 US$’000 (4,852) – (10,107) – (14,959) K-Class vessels US$’000 S-Class vessels US$’000 E-Class vessels US$’000 Other vessels US$’000 4,739 2,759 (4,852) 7,432 1,863 61,130 5,842 848 – 5,807 605 – 12,037 1,896 (10,107) 12,092 605 26,026 120 – – 193 – – 2020 US$’000 61,130 – 26,026 – 87,156 Total US$’000 22,738 5,503 (14,959) 25,524 3,073 87,156 Annual Report 2021 131 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 30 Presentation of adjusted non-GAAP results The following table provides a reconciliation between the Group’s adjusted non-GAAP and statutory financial results: Revenue Cost of sales – Cost of sales before depreciation, amortisation and impairment – Depreciation and amortisation Reversal of impairment/(impairment loss)* Gross profit/(loss) General and administrative – Amortisation of IFRS 16, Leases – Depreciation – Other administrative costs Restructuring costs** Exceptional legal costs*** Year ended 31 December 2021 Year ended 31 December 2020 Adjusted non-GAAP results US$’000 115,127 Adjusting items US$’000 Statutory total US$’000 Adjusted non-GAAP results US$’000 – 115,127 102,492 (41,219) (28,241) – 45,667 (2,410) (78) (9,784) – – – – 14,959 14,959 – – – – – (41,219) (28,241) 14,959 60,626 (2,410) (78) (9,784) – – (42,267) (28,597) – 31,628 (2,543) (313) (9,776) – – Adjusting items US$’000 – – – (87,156) (87,156) – – – (2,492) (3,092) Statutory total US$’000 102,492 (42,267) (28,597) (87,156) (55,528) (2,543) (313) (9,776) (2,492) (3,092) Operating profit/(loss) 33,395 14,959 48,354 18,996 (92,740) (73,744) Finance income Finance expense Cost to acquire new bank facility**** Fair value adjustment on recognition of new debt facility***** Other income Loss on disposal of property plant and equipment Gain on disposal of assets held for sale Foreign exchange loss, net Loss before taxation Taxation charge Profit/(loss) for the year Profit/(loss) attributable to: Owners of the Company Non-controlling interests Gain/(loss) per share (basic) Gain/(loss) per share (diluted) Supplementary non statutory information Operating profit/(loss) Add: Depreciation and amortisation Adjusted EBITDA 9 (12,737) – – 28 – – (1,002) 19,693 (1,707) 17,986 17,768 218 2.57 2.55 33,395 30,729 64,124 – – (3,165) 1,439 – – – – 13,233 – 13,233 13,233 – 1.91 1.91 14,959 – 14,959 9 (12,737) (3,165) 1,439 28 – – (1,002) 32,926 (1,707) 31,219 31,001 218 4.48 4.46 48,354 30,729 79,083 15 (30,495) – – 257 (2,073) 259 (993) (14,034) (1,285) (15,319) (15,354) 35 (4.38) (4.38) 18,996 31,453 50,449 – – (15,797) (448) – – – – (108,985) – (108,985) (108,985) – (31.10) (31.10) (92,740) – (92,740) 15 (30,495) (15,797) (448) 257 (2,073) 259 (993) (123,019) (1,285) (124,304) (124,339) 35 (35.48) (35.48) (73,744) 31,453 (42,291) * ** The reversal of impairment credit/impairment charge on certain vessels and related assets have been added back to gross profit/(loss) to arrive at adjusted gross profit for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 2020 (refer to Note 5 for further details). Management have adjusted this due to the nature of the transaction which management believe is not directly related to operations management are able to influence. This measure provides additional information on the core profitability of the Group. Restructuring costs incurred are not considered part of the regular underlying performance of the business and so have been added back to arrive at adjusted loss for the year ended 31 December 2020 (refer to Note 33 for further details). Management have adjusted this due to them being one off in nature. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management is more directly able to influence and on a basis comparable from year to year. See KPI section on page 34 for further details. *** Exceptional legal costs incurred are not considered part of the regular underlying performance of the business and so have been added back to arrive at adjusted loss for the year ended 31 December 2020 (refer to Note 34 for further details). Management have adjusted this due to them being one off in nature. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management is more directly able to influence and on a basis comparable from year to year. See KPI section on page 34 for further details. **** Costs incurred to arrange a new bank facility have been added back to loss before taxation to arrive at adjusted profit/(loss) for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020. Management have adjusted this due to both the nature of the transaction and the incidence of these transactions occurring. Costs incurred to arrange a new bank facility are not related to the profitability of the Group which management are able to influence and are typically only incurred when a refinance takes place. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management is more directly able to influence and on a basis comparable from year to year. See KPI section on page 34 for further details. ***** The fair value adjustment on recognition of the new loan has been added back to profit/(loss) before taxation to arrive at adjusted loss for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 2020. Management have adjusted this due to them being one off in nature. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management is more directly able to influence and on a basis comparable from year to year. 132 Gulf Marine Services PLC Cashflow reconciliation: Profit/(loss) for the year Adjustments for: (Reversal of impairment)/impairment loss (Note 5)* Cost to acquire new bank facility** Fair value adjustment on recognition of new debt facility*** Finance expenses Other adjustments (Note 38) Cash flow from operating activities before movement in working capital Change in trade and other receivables Change in trade and other payables Cash generated from operations (Note 38) Income tax paid Net cash flows generated from operating activities Net cash flows used in investing activities Payment of issue costs on bank borrowings Other cash flows used in financing activities Net cash flows used in financing activities Net change in cash and cash equivalents Year ended 31 December 2021 Year ended 31 December 2020 Adjusted non-GAAP results US$’000 Adjusting items US$’000 Statutory total US$’000 Adjusted non-GAAP results US$’000 Adjusting items US$’000 Statutory total US$’000 17,986 13,233 31,219 (15,319) (108,985) (124,304) – – – 12,737 32,576 63,299 (17,090) (4,849) 41,360 (849) 40,511 (11,498) (450) (20,925) (14,959) 3,165 (1,439) – – – – – – – – – (3,165) – (14,959) 3,165 (1,439) 12,737 32,576 63,299 (17,090) (4,849) 41,360 (849) – – 87,156 15,797 – 30,495 34,343 49,519 4,866 (1,973) 52,412 (763) 448 – – (5,584) – (1,797) (7,381) – 87,156 15,797 448 30,495 34,343 43,935 4,866 (3,770) 45,031 (763) 40,511 51,649 (7,381) 44,268 (11,498) (3,615) (20,925) (12,350) (115) (22,075) – (14,334) – (12,350) (14,449) (22,075) (21,375) (3,165) (24,540) (22,190) (14,334) (36,524) 7,638 (3,165) 4,473 17,109 (21,715) (4,606) * The reversal of impairment credit/impairment charge on certain vessels and related assets have been added back to Cash flow from operating activities before movement in working capital for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 2020 (refer to Note 5 for further details). ** Costs incurred to arrange a new bank facility have been added back to Cash flow from operating activities before movement in working capital for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 31 December 2020. *** The fair value adjustment on recognition of the new loan has been added back to Cash flow from operating activities before movement in working capital for the year ended 31 December 2021 and 2020. 31 Earnings/(loss) per share Profit/(loss) for the purpose of basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share being profit/(loss) for the year attributable to Owners of the Company (US$’000) Profit/(loss) for the purpose of adjusted basic and diluted earnings/(loss) per share (US$’000) (Note 30) Weighted average number of shares (‘000) Weighted average diluted number of shares in issue (‘000) Basic earnings/(loss) per share (cents) Diluted earnings/(loss) per share (cents) Adjusted earnings/(loss) per share (cents) Adjusted diluted earnings/(loss) per share (cents) 2021 2020 31,001 17,768 691,661 695,753 4.48 4.46 2.57 2.55 (124,339) (15,354) 350,488 350,488 (35.48) (35.48) (4.38) (4.38) Basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company (as disclosed in the statement of comprehensive income) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year. Adjusted earnings/(loss) per share is calculated on the same basis but uses the profit/(loss) for the purpose of basic earnings/(loss) per share (shown above) adjusted by adding back the non-operational items, which were recognised in the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income in the prior year. The adjusted earnings/(loss) per share is presented as the Directors consider it provides an additional indication of the underlying performance of the Group. Annual Report 2021 133 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 31 Earnings/(loss) per share continued Diluted earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, adjusted for the weighted average effect of share-based payment charge outstanding during the year. As the Group incurred a loss in 2020, diluted earnings/(loss) per share is the same as loss per share, as the effect of share-based payment charge was anti-dilutive. Adjusted diluted earnings/(loss) per share is calculated on the same basis but uses adjusted profit/(loss) (Note 30) attributable to equity holders of the Company. The following table shows a reconciliation between the basic and diluted weighted average number of shares: Weighted average basic number of shares in issue Weighted average effect of LTIP’s Weighted average diluted number of shares in issue 32 Revenue Charter hire Lease income Messing and accommodation Maintenance service Mobilisation and demobilisation Sundry income Revenue recognised – over time Revenue recognised – point in time 2021 ’000s 691,661 4,092 695,753 2021 US$’000 63,525 38,824 7,971 2,865 1,077 865 115,127 113,931 1,196 115,127 2020 ’000s 350,488 – 350,488 2020 US$’000 60,797 33,252 5,506 1,267 1,030 640 102,492 101,683 809 102,492 Included in mobilisation and demobilisation income is an amount of US$ 0.1 million (2020 US$ 0.3 million) that was included as deferred revenue at the beginning of the financial year. Lease income: Maturity analysis: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 – 5 Onwards Split between: Current Non-current Further descriptions on the above types of revenue have been provided in Note 3. 2021 2020 47,994 21,306 4,305 – 73,605 47,994 25,611 73,605 40,529 22,856 21,175 – 84,559 40,529 44,030 84,559 134 Gulf Marine Services PLC 33 Restructuring costs During 2019 and 2020, the organisational structure was simplified with a number of management posts removed and not replaced. In addition, the operational footprint was reviewed and certain operations in the UK and MENA were closed. Consultancy costs incurred mainly related to legal advice on restructuring and Board changes. There were no such costs in the current year. Total restructuring costs was US$ 8.8 million, of which US$ 6.3 million was incurred in 2019 and US$ 2.5 million in 2020. At 31 December 2021, the remaining provision was US$ 0.2 million (31 December 2020: US$ 0.3 million), which is expected to be fully utilised over the next 12 months. Staff costs Consultancy fees Business travel Office/port closures 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 – – – – – 1,862 403 82 145 2,492 34 Exceptional legal costs During the year ended 31 December 2020, as a result of the non-binding proposed offer to buy the share capital of the Company from our largest shareholder, several requests for General Meetings, and legal advice for Director disputes, additional were incurred in 2020 totalling to US$ 3.1 million, which did not repeat in the current year. 35 Finance income Bank and other income 36 Finance expense Interest on bank borrowings (Note 21) Cost to acquire new bank facility*(Note 21) Recognition of embedded derivative for contract to issue warrants (Note 10) Loss on IRS reclassified to profit or loss Net loss on changes in fair value of embedded derivative for contract to issue warrants Interest on finance leases (Note 7) Net gain on revision of debt facility (Note 21) Derecognition of embedded derivative for contract to issue warrants (Note 10) Net (gain)/loss on changes in fair value of interest rate swap (Note 10) Other finance expenses * Costs incurred to acquire new loan facility including arrangement, advisory and legal fees. 2021 US$’000 9 2020 US$’000 15 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 17,545 3,165 926 278 232 147 (6,332) (1,890) (278) 670 14,463 27,626 15,797 1,449 901 – 182 (1,070) – 1,551 301 46,740 Annual Report 2021 135 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 37 Profit/(loss) for the year The profit/(loss) for the year is stated after charging/(crediting): Total staff costs (see below) Depreciation of property and equipment (Note 5) Amortisation of dry docking expenditure (Note 6) Depreciation of right-of-use assets (Note 7) Foreign exchange loss, net Auditor’s remuneration (see below) Expense relating to short term leases or leases of low value assets (Note 7) Movement in ECL provision during the year (Note 9) (Reversal of impairment)/impairment loss (Note 5) Recovery of ECL provision (Note 9) Loss on disposal of property plant and equipment Gain on disposal of assets held for sale The average number of full time equivalent employees (excluding non-executive Directors) by geographic area was: Middle East and Northern Africa Rest of the world 2021 US$’000 31,761 22,816 5,503 2,411 1,002 1,141 525 62 (14,959) – – – 2020 US$’000 28,264 25,837 3,074 2,543 993 1,025 247 69 87,156 (64) 2,073 (259) 2021 Number 2020 Number 499 35 534 467 29 496 The total number of full time equivalent employees (including executive Directors) as at 31 December 2021 was 545 (31 December 2020: 533). Their aggregate remuneration comprised: Wages and salaries End of service benefit (Note 19) Share based payment charge Employment taxes The analysis of the auditor’s remuneration is as follows: Group audit fees Subsidiary audit fees Total audit fees Audit-related assurance services – interim review Audit-related assurance services – equity raise review Total fees 2021 US$’000 31,039 678 26 18 31,761 2020 US$’000 27,692 527 7 38 28,264 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 631 62 693 240 170 784 95 879 146 – 1,103 1,025 For further information on the Group’s policy in respect of Auditor’s remuneration see page 51 of the Report of the Audit and Risk Committee. 136 Gulf Marine Services PLC 38 Notes to the consolidated statement of cash flows Operating activities Profit/(loss) for the year Adjustments for: Depreciation of property and equipment (Note 5) Finance expenses (Note 36) Amortisation of dry docking expenditure (Note 6) Depreciation of right-of-use assets (Note 7) Income tax expense (Note 8) Movement in ECL provision during the year (Note 9) End of service benefits charge (Note 19) (Reversal of impairment)/impairment loss (Note 5) End of service benefits paid (Note 19) Share-based payment charge (Note 15) Interest income (Note 35) Recovery of ECL provision (Note 9) Loss on disposal of property and equipment (Note 37) Gain on disposal of assets held for sale (Note 37) Hedging revenue adjustment (Note 10) Other income Cash flow from operating activities before movement in working capital (Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables Decrease in trade and other payables Cash generated from operations Taxation paid Net cash generated from operating activities 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 31,219 (124,304) 22,816 14,463 5,503 2,411 1,707 62 678 (14,959) (546) (18) (9) – – – – (28) 63,299 (17,090) (4,849) 41,360 (849) 40,511 25,837 46,740 3,074 2,543 1,285 69 527 87,156 (617) 168 (15) (64) 2,073 (259) (21) (257) 43,935 4,866 (3,770) 45,031 (763) 44,268 Annual Report 2021 137 Financial Statements NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 38 Notes to the consolidated statement of cash flows continued Changes in liabilities arising from financing activities The table below details changes in the Group’s liabilities arising from financing activities, including both cash and non-cash changes. Liabilities arising from financing activities are those for which cash flows were, or future cash flows will be, classified in the Group’s consolidated statement of cash flows as cash flows from financing activities. At 1 January 2020 Financing cash flows Bank borrowings received Repayment of bank borrowings Principal elements of lease payments Settlement of derivatives Interest paid Total financing cashflows Non-cash changes: Recognition of new lease liability additions Interest on leases (Note 36) Interest on bank borrowings (Note 36) Gain on fair value changes of hedging instruments (Note 10) Net loss on change in fair value of IRS (Note 10) Loss on fair value changes on the embedded derivative (Note 10) Gain on revision of debt facility (Note 36) Total non cash changes At 31 December 2020 Financing cash flows Bank borrowings received Repayment of bank borrowings Principal elements of lease payments Settlement of derivatives Interest paid Total financing cashflows Non-cash changes: Recognition of new lease liability additions Interest on leases (Note 36) Interest on bank borrowings (Note 36) Bank commitment fees (Note 36) Gain on revision of debt facility (Note 36) Net gain on change in fair value of IRS (Note 10) Loss on fair value changes on the embedded derivative (Note 10) The expensing of unamortised issue costs in relation to previous loan (Note 36) Revaluation gain on revision of debt cash flows at the date of modification (Note 36) Total non cash changes At 31 December 2021 Derivatives (Note 10) US$’000 Lease liabilities (Note 22) US$’000 Bank borrowings (Note 21) US$’000 1,740 1,954 401,955 – – – (883) – (883) – – – (21) 1,551 1,449 – 2,979 3,836 – – – (1,033) – (1,033) – – – – – (278) (732) – – (1,010) 1,793 – – (1,871) – (193) (2,064) 3,239 182 – – – – – 3,421 3,311 – – (2,342) – (147) (2,489) 1,955 147 – – – – – – – 2,102 2,924 21,500 (12,075) – – (27,903) (18,478) – – 27,626 – – – (1,070) 26,556 410,033 2,000 (30,983) – – (12,737) (41,720) – – 17,545 – (6,332) – – – – 11,213 379,526 39 Events after the reporting period Russia-Ukraine conflict On 24th February 2022, Russia launched ground and air attacks on Ukraine which led to the closure of airports and land borders. This developing situation has the potential to impact Group’s operations and presents a risk to the health, safety and welfare of certain GMS’ employees living in Ukraine. The Group has implemented procedures to provide required support should employees be affected as well as ensure continuity across the business. In response to military action launched by Russia, western countries and other global allies imposed an unprecedented package of coordinated sanctions against Russia. The Group has minimal activity with suppliers in Russia and continues to manage its supply chain and has robust procedures in place to avoid any disruption to operations. Overall, the Group does not expect the war in Ukraine and resulting sanctions to have a significant impact on operations. 138 Gulf Marine Services PLC COMPANY STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2021 Non-current assets Investments in subsidiaries Other receivables Total non-current assets Current assets Other receivables Cash and cash equivalents Total current assets Creditors: Amounts falling due within one year Other payables Net current liabilities Total assets less current liabilities Creditors: Amounts falling due after more than one year Derivatives Net assets Equity Share capital – Ordinary Share capital – Deferred Share premium account Share based payment reserve Retained earnings Total equity Notes 5 6 6 8 9 10 10 10 10 2021 US$’000 229,806 43,591 273,397 216 − 216 Restated* 2020 US$’000 247,325 2,798 250,123 48 64 112 36,172 36,172 18,173 18,173 237,441 232,062 717 1,449 236,724 230,613 30,117 46,445 99,105 3,647 57,410 58,057 − 93,080 3,739 75,737 236,724 230,613 The Company reported a loss for the financial year ended 31 December 2021 of US$ 18.3 million (2020: US$ 330.1 million). The financial statements of Gulf Marine Services PLC (registered number 08860816) were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 12 May 2022. Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors Mansour Al Alami Executive Chairman Lord Anthony St John of Bletso Independent Non-executive Director * Details of the prior period reclassification can be found in Note 13 The attached Notes 1 to 14 form an integral part of these financial statements. Annual Report 2021 139 Financial Statements COMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 At 1 January 2020 Loss for the year/ Total comprehensive expense Share based payment charge (Note 10) At 31 December 2020 Loss for the year/ Total comprehensive expense Share based payment credit (Note 10) Capital reorganisation (Note 10) Issue of share capital (Note 10) Share issue costs Cash settlement of share based payments (Note 12) Share capital – Ordinary US$’000 58,057 − − 58,057 − − (46,445) 18,505 − Share capital – Deferred US$’000 − − − − − − − 46,445 − Share premium account US$’000 93,080 − − 93,080 − − − 9,253 (3,228) − − − Share based payment reserve US$’000 Retained earnings US$’000 Total equity US$’000 3,569 405,857 560,563 − 170 3,739 (330,120) − 75,737 (330,120) 170 230,613 − (18) − − − (74) (18,327) − − − − − (18,327) (18) (46,445) 74,203 (3,228) (74) At 31 December 2021 30,117 46,445 99,105 3,647 57,410 236,724 The attached Notes 1 to 14 form an integral part of these financial statements. 140 Gulf Marine Services PLC NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 1 Corporate information Gulf Marine Services PLC (“the Company”) was a private company limited by shares, incorporated in the United Kingdom under the Companies Act 2006 and is registered in England and Wales. On 7 February 2014, the Company re-registered as a public limited company. The address of the registered office of the Company is 107 Hammersmith Road, London, United Kingdom, W14 0QH. The registered number of the Company is 08860816. The Company is the Parent Company of the Gulf Marine Services PLC Group comprising of Gulf Marine Services PLC and its underlying subsidiaries (“the Group”). The consolidated Group accounts are publicly available. 2 Accounting policies Currency The functional and presentational currency of the Company is US Dollars (“US$”). Going concern The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is premised on the same assessment as the Group. The Group’s Directors have assessed the Group’s financial position for a period through to June 2023 and have a reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. The material uncertainty over going concern that existed and was previously disclosed as a significant judgment when the 31 December 2020 financial statements were approved on 21 May 2021 no longer exists due to the successful issuance of equity in June 2021, which removed the potential event of default on the Group’s revised bank facilities, as renegotiated in March 2021. The renegotiation of bank facilities also resulted in a 40% reduction in margin payable in 2021 and 2022, with the surplus cash generated from these savings used to accelerate repayment of the loan principal (refer to Note 21 in the Group consolidated financial statements for further details on the revised terms of the bank facility). As a result of the above refinancing in March 2021 and subsequent equity raise in June 2021, the Directors no longer consider going concern to be a critical accounting judgment as at 31 December 2021. The Group is exploring various contractual options available per the current bank terms to take place by the end of 2022. As disclosed in the strategic report, the two options available are the raise of US$ 50 million equity or the issuance of 87.6 million warrants giving potential rights to 132 million shares if exercised. As at 31 December 2021, the Board consider the more likely outcome will be the issuance of warrants rather than the equity raise. PIK interest will potentially accrue, only if the net leverage ratio is above 4.0 times. Based on the latest Board approved projections, the net leverage ratio is expected to be below 4.0x and therefore no PIK interest is expected. The forecast used for Going Concern reflects management’s key assumptions including those around utilisation and vessel day rates on a vessel-by-vessel basis. Specifically, these assumptions are: • Average day rates across the fleet are assumed to be US$ 28.6k for the 18 month period to 30 June 2023; • 90% forecast utilisation for the 18 month period to 30 June 2023; • Strong pipeline of tenders and opportunities for new contracts that would commence during the forecast period. As noted above the impact of COVID-19 has also been considered in short-term forecasts approved by the Board which include additional hotel and testing costs for offshore crew whilst in quarantine. Terms and conditions of crew rotations have also been amended and costs updated to reflect this. Rotations have been extended for all crew to limit the number of times in quarantine and the number of changeouts on the crew which increases the risk of infection each time it occurs. All policies are in line with Government and client guidelines for offshore activities. Management note that the impact of COVID-19 has shown significant signs of easing in H1 2021, continuing throughout 2022 and therefore this is not expected to be a long-term risk. While the current situation regarding the war in Ukraine and Russian sanctions described on page 33 remains uncertain, the Directors believe the potential impact of the war, border closures and resulting sanctions will not have a significant impact on operations. Brexit is not expected to have a significant effect on the Group’s operations as 12 of 13 vessels are in the MENA region. The Group is expected to continue to generate positive operating cash flows for the foreseeable future and has in place a committed working capital facility of US$ 50.0 million, of which US$ 25.0 million can be utilised to support the issuance of performance bonds and guarantees. The balance can be utilised to draw down cash. US$ 21.5 million of this facility was utilised as at 31 December 2021, leaving US$ 3.5 million available for drawdown as at 31 March 2022 (2020: US$ 3.5 million). There was a reduction to the cash element of the working capital facility by US$ 5 million to US$ 20 million on 31st March 2022. A payment of US$ 5 million was made by the Group on the same day reducing the amount utilised to US$ 16.5 million, leaving US$ 3.5 million available for drawdown. The working capital facility expires alongside the main debt facility in June 2025. The principal borrowing facilities are subject to covenants and are measured bi-annually in June and December. Refer to Note 21 in the Group consolidated financial statements for further details. Annual Report 2021 141 Financial Statements NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 2 Accounting policies continued Going concern continued The Group’s forecasts, having taken into consideration reasonable risks and downsides, indicate that its revised bank facilities along with sufficient order book of contracted work (currently secured 86% of revenue for FY 2022) and a strong pipeline of near-term opportunities for additional work (a further 6% is at an advanced stages of negotiation captured in the Group’s backlog) will provide sufficient liquidity for its requirements for the foreseeable future and accordingly the consolidated financial statements for the Group for the current period have been prepared on a going concern basis. A downside case was prepared using the following assumptions: • no work-to-win in 2022; • a 22 percent reduction in work to win utilisation in H1 2023; and • a reduction in day-rates for an E-Class vessel assumed to have the largest day rate, by 10% commencing from November 2022, i.e. after expiry of the current secured period. Based on the above scenario, the Group would not be in breach of its term loan facility, however, the net leverage ratio is forecast to exceed 4.0 times as at 31 December 2022 for a period of 6 months and therefore PIK interest of US$ 3.9 million would accrue in the assessment period and has been included in the above forecast. Such PIK would be settled as part of the bullet payment on expiry of the Group’s term loan facility in June 2025. The downside case is considered to be severe but plausible and would still leave the Group with $10m of liquidity and in compliance with the covenants under the Group’s banking facilities throughout the period until the end of May 2023. In addition to the above reasonably plausible downside sensitivity, the Directors have also considered a reverse stress test, where adjusted EBITDA has been sufficiently reduced to breach the net leverage ratio as a result of a combination of reduced utilisation and day rates, as noted below: • no work-to-win in 2022; • a 40 percent and 25 percent reduction in options utilisation in 2022 and H1 2023 respectively; • a 48 percent reduction in work to win utilisation in H1 2023; and • a reduction in day-rates for an E-Class vessel assumed to have the largest day rate, by 10% commencing from November 2022, i.e. after expiry of the current secured period. Based on the above scenario, net leverage ratio is forecast to exceed 4.0 times at 31 December 2022 for a period of 6 months and therefore PIK interest of US$ 3.9 million would accrue in the assessment period and has been included in the above forecast. Such PIK would be settled as part of the bullet payment on expiry of the Group’s term loan facility in June 2025. The net leverage ratio is also breached at HY 2023. Should circumstances arise that differ from the Group’s projections, the Directors believe that a number of mitigating actions can be executed successfully in the necessary timeframe to meet debt repayment obligations as they become due (refer Note 21 in the Group consolidated financial statements for maturity profiles) and in order to maintain liquidity. Potential mitigating actions include the following: • Reduction in client specific capex due to no mobilisation of vessels of approximately US$ 4 million in 2022 and US$ 2.5 million in H1 2023; • Vessels off hire for prolonged periods could be cold stacked to minimise operating costs on these vessels at the rate of US$ 35,000/ month for K-Class and US$ 50,000/month for S-Class/E-Class; • Reduction in overhead costs, particularly, bonus payments estimated at US$ 125k per month; and • 2022 – H2 2024 voluntary payments could be deferred till H1 2025 when the bullet payment will be made as there would be less cash available to help deleverage on a voluntary basis. Further information on the use of the going concern basis has been disclosed in the Director’s report (page 76). GMS remains cognisant of the wider context in which it operates and the impact that climate change could have on the financial statements of the Group. Please refer to page 4 for more details of climate change and mitigants adopted by the Group. Basis of accounting The separate financial statements of the Company are presented as required by the Companies Act 2006. These have been prepared under the historical cost convention, modified to include certain items at fair value, and in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 102 (FRS 102) issued by the Financial Reporting Council. The Company has elected to take the exemption under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’) to not present the Company Income Statement nor the Company Statement of Comprehensive Income. The result for the Company for the year was a loss of US$ 18.3 million (2020: loss of US$ 330.1 million). The principal accounting policies are summarised below. They have all been applied consistently throughout both years. The Company meets the definition of a qualifying entity under FRS 102 and has therefore taken advantage of the disclosure exemptions available to it. Exemptions have been taken in relation to the presentation of a statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, cash flow statement, remuneration of key management personnel, and financial instrument disclosures. Investments Investments in subsidiaries are recognised at cost less impairment. 142 Gulf Marine Services PLC Financial instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the Company’s statement of financial position, when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial liabilities Financial liabilities are classified as either financial liabilities at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss (‘‘FVTPL’’) or ‘‘other financial liabilities’’. Other payables are classified as ‘‘other financial liabilities’’. Other financial liabilities are initially measured at the transaction price, net of transaction costs. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (“EIR”) method, with interest expense recognised on an effective interest rate, except for short-term payables or when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. The EIR method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability, or, where appropriate, a shorter period. Derecognition of financial liabilities The Company derecognises financial liabilities when, and only when, the Company’s obligations are discharged, cancelled or they expire. Derivative liability The Company considers whether a contract contains a derivative liability when it becomes a party to the contract. Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value at the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at each reporting date. The resulting gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss immediately. Equity instruments An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs. Financial assets Basic financial assets including other receivables and cash and bank balances are initially measured at transaction price, plus transaction costs. Such assets are subsequently carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Interest income is recognised by applying the effective interest rate method, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. Other financial assets are initially measured at fair value, which is normally the transaction price. Such assets are subsequently carried at fair value and the changes in fair value are recognised in profit or loss. Impairment of financial assets Financial assets are assessed for indicators of impairment at each balance sheet date. Financial assets are impaired where there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, the estimated future cash flows of the investment have been affected. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits. Taxation Current tax, including UK Corporation tax, is provided at amounts expected to be paid (or recovered) using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed at the reporting date where transactions or events that result in an obligation to pay more tax in the future or a right to pay less tax in the future have occurred at the reporting date. Deferred tax is measured on a non-discounted basis. Timing differences are differences between the Company’s taxable profits and its results as stated in the financial statements that arise from the inclusion of gains and losses in tax assessment periods different from those in which they are recognised in the financial statements. Unrelieved tax losses and other deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent that, on the basis of all available evidence, it can be regarded as more likely than not that there will be suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of the underlying timing differences can be deducted. Deferred tax is measured using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date that are expected to apply to the reversal of the timing difference. Annual Report 2021 143 Financial Statements NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 2 Accounting policies continued Foreign currencies Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded using the rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the contracted rate or the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date and the gains or losses on translation are included in the profit or loss account. Share-based payments The fair value of an equity instrument is determined at the grant date based on market prices if available, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which those equity instruments were granted. If market prices are not available for share awards, the fair value of the equity instruments is estimated using a valuation technique to derive an estimate of what the price of those equity instruments would have been at the relevant measurement date in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. Equity-settled share-based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the instruments, using a binomial model together with Monte Carlo simulations as at the grant date, and is expensed over the vesting period. The value of the expense is dependent upon certain key assumptions including the expected future volatility of the Company’s share price at the date of grant. The fair value measurement reflects all market based vesting conditions. Service and non-market performance conditions are taken into account in determining the number of rights that are expected to vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognised in profit or loss such that the cumulative expense reflects the revised estimate, with a corresponding adjustment to equity reserves. 3 Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty In the application of the Company’s accounting policies, which are described in Note 2, the Directors are required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Critical judgements in applying the Company’s accounting policies Critical accounting judgements are those which management make in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies and that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements. Management has not made any critical judgements in applying the Company’s accounting policies for the year ended 31 December 2021. Key source of estimation uncertainty The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods. The key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty that may have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying value of assets and liabilities within the next financial year, are outlined below. Recoverability of investments As noted above, the Company performs impairment reviews in respect of investments whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised when the recoverable amount of an asset, which is the higher of the asset’s net realisable value and its value in use, is less than its carrying amount. The recoverability of investments is primarily impacted by the cash flows of the vessels owned by the Group’s subsidiary undertakings and cashflows related to the Group’s debt facility. The projection of cash flows related to vessels and debt facility requires the use of various estimates including future day rates, vessel utilisation levels, and discount rates, in which the estimate is most sensitive. For further details on analysis of the sensitivities of these estimates, refer to Note 5. The Company undertook a full impairment review of its investments during the year. The review led to the recognition of an aggregate impairment of US$ 17.0 million (2020:US$ 327.7 million) on the investment in subsidiaries (see Note 5). As at 31 December 2021, the Company had investments of US$ 229.8 million (2020: US$ 247.3 million). 4 Dividends There was no interim dividend declared or paid in 2021 (2020: Nil). No final dividend in respect of the year ended 31 December 2021 (2020: Nil at the 2021 AGM) is to be proposed at the 2021 AGM. 144 Gulf Marine Services PLC 5 Investment in subsidiaries Gross investments in subsidiaries as at 01 January Capital (reduction)/contribution in subsidiary in relation to derivative liability (Note 9) Gross investments in subsidiaries as at 31 December Impairments as at 01 January Impairment of investments in year Impairments as at 31 December Carrying amount as at 31 December 2021 US$’000 574,995 (523) 574,472 (327,670) (16,996) (344,666) 229,806 2020 US$’000 573,546 1,449 574,995 – (327,670) (327,670) 247,325 As at 31 December 2021, the market capitalisation of the GMS Group continued to be lower than the carrying value of investments in the Company’s investments in its subsidiary undertakings. Management engaged an independent expert to derive a nominal post-tax discount rate which was estimated at 12.10% (2020: 9.86%). This increase in post-tax discount rate was a further indicator of impairment and accordingly, the Company undertook a full assessment of recoverable amount of its investments in subsidiaries at the reporting date. The review was done by identifying the value in use of each vessel in the fleet as the underlying cash generating units of the investments in subsidiaries. The net bank debt of the GMS Group was then deducted from the value in use of the investments, which was based on the combined value in use of vessels within the Group. This assessment is based on management’s projections of utilisation and day rates and associated cash flows and adjusted to include full overheads and future tax charges. Projections used to derive future cashflows reflect the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and oil price environment. The risk adjusted cash flows were discounted using the nominal post-tax discount rate mentioned above of 12.1% (2020: 9.86%), which reflects the current market assessment of the time value of money and is based on the Group’s weighted average cost of capital. The discount rate has been calculated using industry sector average beta, risk free rates of return as well as specific adjustments for country risk and tax regimes in the countries in which the Group operates and a size premium. A post tax discount rate was used as the cashflows to derive the value in use of investments in subsidiaries includes the impacts of tax as described above. In concurrence with external advisors, management reviewed and narrowed down the peer companies used to compute the discount rate and measured the overall impact of existing and additional risks relating to the Company, resulting in an increase of the WACC to 12.1% as noted above. The review led to the recognition of an aggregate impairment of US$ 17.0 million (2020: US$ 327.7 million) on the investment in subsidiaries. Although this is in contrast to the reversal of impairment recognised in the Group financial statements of US$ 15.0 million (2020: impairment of US$ 87.2 million), management believe this is reasonable based on the value in use of investments and the Group’s current share price. The assessment described above takes into account complete profitability of underlying investments which also included implications of tax and debt. The Company has conducted an analysis of the sensitivity of the impairment test to reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions (day rates, utilisation and nominal post-tax discount rates) used to determine the recoverable amount of investments. The first sensitivity modelled a 10% increase/reduction to day rates over the remaining useful economic life of vessels included in investments. A second sensitivity modelled a 10% increase/reduction to utilisation rates. A third sensitivity was modelled where a 1% increase/decrease was applied to the post-tax discount rate mentioned above. As mentioned above management reviewed and narrowed down the peer companies used to compute the discount rate following consultation with external advisors. The same companies will be used going forward as these are deemed to be more specific to GMS’s capital structure and therefore management does not anticipate significant changes beyond 1% to the discount rate going forward. The results of the first sensitivity indicated that a 10% decrease to dayrates would lead to an additional impairment charge of US$ 105.2 million. In comparison, a 10% increase to dayrates would reduce the impairment charge booked by US$ 17.0 million to US$ nil and lead to a reversal of impairment of US$ 88.2 million. The total carrying amount of investments would be US$ 124.6 million and US$ 335.0 million, respectively. The results of the second sensitivity indicated that a 10% decrease to utilisation would lead to an additional impairment charge of US$ 105.2 million. In comparison, a 10% increase to utilisation would reduce the impairment charge booked by US$ 17.0 million to US$ nil and lead to a reversal of impairment of US$ 55.4 million. The total carrying amount of investments would be US$ 124.6 million and US$ 302.2 million, respectively. The results of the third sensitivity indicated that a 1% decrease to the nominal post-tax discount rate would lead to a reduction of the impairment charge booked during the period of US$ 17.0 million to US$ nil and a reversal of impairment of US$ 29.9 million whereas a 1% increase to the nominal post-tax discount rate would lead to an increase to the impairment charge booked during the period of US$ 41.3 million. The total carrying amount of investments would be US$ 276.7 million and US$ 188.5 million, respectively. Annual Report 2021 145 Financial Statements NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 5 Investment in subsidiaries continued The Company has investments in the following subsidiaries: Name Place of Registration Registered Address 2021 2020 Type of Activity Gulf Marine Services W.L.L. United Arab Emirates Office 403, International Tower, 24th Karama 100% 100% Marine contractors Proportion of Ownership Interest Offshore Holding Invt SA Panama Offshore Logistics Invt SA Panama Offshore Accommodation Panama Invt SA Offshore Jack-up Invt SA Panama Offshore Craft Invt SA Panama Offshore Structure Invt SA Panama Offshore Maritime Invt SA Panama Offshore Tugboat Invt SA Panama Offshore Boat Invt SA Panama Offshore Kudeta Invt SA Panama GMS Endurance Invt SA Panama Street, P.O. Box 46046, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama 100% 100% Holding Company 100% 100% Dormant 100% 100% Dormant 100% 100% Owner of barge “Kamikaze” Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama 100% 100% Owner of barge “GMS Endeavour” Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama, Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama, Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama, Republic of Panama 100% 100% Owner of barge “Kikuyu” 100% 100% Owner of “Helios” – Dormant 100% 100% Owner of “Atlas” – Dormant 100% 100% Owner of barge “Kawawa” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Kudeta” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Endurance” Gulf Marine Services (UK) United Kingdom 14 Carden Place, Aberdeen, AB10 1UR 100% 100% Operator of offshore barges Limited Gulf Marine Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Co. Limited King Fahad Road, Al Khobar, Eastern Province, P.O. Box 31411 Kingdom Saudi Arabia 75% 75% Operator of offshore barges Gulf Marine Services (Asia) Singapore Pte. Ltd. 1 Scotts Road, #21-07, Shaw Centre, Singapore, 228208 100% 100% Operator of offshore barges GMS Enterprise Investment SA Panama GMS Sharqi Investment SA Panama GMS Scirocco Investment SA Panama GMS Shamal Investment SA Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama 100% 100% Owner of barge “Enterprise” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Sharqi” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Scirocco” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Shamal” GMS Jersey Holdco. 1 Jersey 12 Castle Street, St. Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RT 100% 100% General investment Limited* GMS Jersey Holdco. 2 Limited Jersey 12 Castle Street, St. Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RT GMS Marine Middle East FZE United Arab Emirates ELOB, Office No. E-16F-04, P.O. Box 53944, Hamriyah Free Zone, Sharjah 100% 100% 100% General investment 100% Operator of offshore barges GMS Global Commercial Invt United Arab Emirates Office 403, International Tower, 24th Karama 100% 100% General investment LLC GMS Keloa Invt SA Panama GMS Pepper Invt SA Panama GMS Evolution Invt SA Panama Street, P.O. Box 46046, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama,Republic of Panama 100% 100% Owner of barge “Keloa” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Pepper” 100% 100% Owner of barge “Evolution” Gulf Marine Services LLC Qatar Qatar Financial Centre, Doha Mena Marine Limited Singapore Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands, P.O. Box 309 100% 100% 100% Marine contractor 100% General investment GMS Phoenix Investment SA Bloc Office Hub, Fifth Floor, Santa Maria Business District, Panama, Republic of Panama 100% 100% Dormant * Held directly by Gulf Marine Services PLC. 146 Gulf Marine Services PLC 6 Other receivables Non-current assets Amounts receivable from Group undertakings Current assets Other receivables 2021 US$’000 43,591 43,591 216 216 Restated 2020 US$’000 2,798 2,798 48 48 43,807 2,846 Amounts receivable from Group undertakings are interest-free, unsecured and have no fixed repayment terms. 7 Deferred tax asset At the reporting date, the Company has unused tax losses of US$ 12.8 million available for offset against future profits (2020: US$ 12.1 million). These UK tax losses may be carried forward indefinitely. The Company had insufficient future taxable profits to justify the recognition of a deferred tax asset and therefore no deferred tax asset has been recognised in the current year (2020: US$ Nil). 8 Other payables Amounts falling due within one year Amounts owed to Group undertakings Other payables 2021 US$’000 35,606 566 36,172 Restated 2020 US$’000 17,446 727 18,173 Amounts owed to Group undertakings are current, interest-free, unsecured and have no fixed repayment terms. Balances with related parties are repayable on demand. The present value of the liability is deemed to equal the undiscounted cash amount payable. No interest charge is therefore imputed on these amounts. 9 Derivative financial instruments Derivative liability – contract to issue warrants In June 2020, the Group restructured the terms of its borrowings with its lenders. These terms included warrants to be issued to its lenders if the Group had not raised US$ 75.0 million of equity by no later than 31 December 2020. As this term was not expected to be met, an embedded derivative liability was recognised for the obligation to issue the warrants. At 31 December 2020 these had a value of US$ 1.4 million, which had increased to US$ 1.8 million by March 2021. In March 2021, the Group amended the terms of its loan facility, as described above, and additional time was granted to raise equity before warrants were required to be issued to its lenders. The previous obligation to issue warrants to the bank was waived, and a contingent requirement to issue warrants to banks was introduced. The amended terms required US$ 25.0 million of equity to be raised by 31 December 2021 otherwise the Group would be in default, and a further US$ 50.0 million to be raised by 31 December 2022. The Group was subsequently successful with the requirement to raise the first tranche of equity (Refer to Note 13). As the new terms of the loan facility contained separate distinguishable terms with a contingent requirement to issue warrants to banks, management determined the debt facility to contain an embedded derivative liability. The Group was required to recognise the embedded derivative liability at fair value. Management commissioned an independent valuation expert to measure the fair value of the warrants, which was determined using Monte Carlo simulations. The simulation considers sensitivity by building models of possible results by substituting a range of values. The loan facility was a tri-partite agreement between the Company, a subsidiary of the Group and the Group’s banking syndicate. As the embedded derivative was over the Company’s equity, a derivative liability has been recorded on the Company’s balance sheet with a corresponding increase in the investment in the subsidiary representing a capital contribution. The fair value of the liability as at 31 December 2021 was US$ 0.7 million (31 December 2020 US$ 1.4 million). As the derivative is due to be settled after 12 months, the balance is recognised as a non-current liability. Annual Report 2021 147 Financial Statements NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 9 Derivative financial instruments continued Derivative liability – contract to issue warrants continued The movement in the derivative financial statements is as follows: As at 1 January Derecognition of derivative liability warrants Initial recognition of derivative liability Net loss on changes in fair value of derivative liabilities As at 31 December 10 Share capital and reserves The share capital of Gulf Marine Services PLC was as follows: Ordinary shares at £0.02 per share At 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2021 Placing of new shares Capital reorganisation As at 31 December 2021 Deferred shares at £0.08 per share At 1 January 2020 and 1 January 2021 Capital reorganisation As at 31 December 2021 2021 US$’000 (1,449) 1,890 (926) (232) (717) 2020 US$’000 – – (1,449) – (1,449) Number of ordinary shares (Thousands) 350,488 665,927 – 1,016,415 Number of ordinary shares (Thousands) – 350,488 350,488 Ordinary shares US$’000 58,057 18,505 (46,445) 30,117 Ordinary shares US$’000 – 46,445 46,445 Prior to an equity raise on 28 June 2021 the Company underwent a capital reorganisation where all existing ordinary shares with a nominal value of 10p per share were subdivided and re-designated into 1 ordinary share with a nominal value of 2p and 1 deferred share with a nominal value of 8p each. The previously recognised share capital balance relating to the old 10p ordinary shares was allocated pro rata to the new subdivided 2p ordinary shares and 8p deferred shares. The deferred shares have no voting rights and no right to the profits generated by the Company. On winding-up or other return of capital, the holders of deferred shares have extremely limited rights. The Company has the right but not the obligation to buy back all of the Deferred Shares for an amount not exceeding £1.00 in aggregate without obtaining the sanction of the holder or holders of the Deferred Shares. As there is no contractual obligation, management do not consider there to be a liability. As part of the equity raise on 28 June 2021, the Company issued 665,926,795 new ordinary shares with a nominal value of 2p per share at 3p per share with the additional pence per share being recognised in the share premium account. Issue costs amounting to US$ 3.2 million (31 December 2020: US$ nil) have been deducted from the share premium account. The Company has one class of ordinary shares, which carry no right to fixed income. The share premium account contains the premium arising on issue of equity shares, net of related costs. The Company’s share-based payment reserve of US$ 3.6 million (2020: US$ 3.7 million) relates to the cumulative charge for awards granted to employees of a subsidiary undertaking under a long-term incentive plan, details of which are provided in Note 12. The share-based payment credit during the year was US$ 0.02 million (2020: share-based payment charge of US$ 0.2 million). The retained earnings represent cumulative profits or losses net of dividends paid and other adjustments. 148 Gulf Marine Services PLC 11 Staff numbers and costs The average monthly number of employees (including executive directors) was: Administration Their aggregate remuneration comprised: Wages and salaries Employment taxes 2021 Number 2020 Number 4 4 3 3 2021 US$’000 2020 US$’000 241 – 241 931 11 942 12 Long term incentive plans The Company has Long Term Incentive Plans (“LTIPs”) which were granted to senior management, managers and senior offshore officers. From 2019 onwards the employment condition is that each eligible employee of the Company must remain in employment during the three-year vesting period. LTIPs have been aligned to the Company’s share performance therefore only financial metrics will be applied. EPS (“Earnings Per Share”) has been removed as the financial metric and TSR (“Total Shareholder Return”) is now the sole financial metric. In the prior years until 2018, the release of these shares was conditional upon continued employment, certain market vesting conditions and in the case of senior management LTIP awards, performance against three-year target EPS compound annual growth rates. Equity-settled share-based payments were measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined, using the Binomial Probability Model together with Monte Carlo simulations, at the grant date of equity-settled share-based payments, is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on an estimate of the number of shares that will ultimately vest. The fair value of each award was determined by taking into account the market performance condition, the term of the award, the share price at grant date, the expected price volatility of the underlying share and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the award. Non-market vesting conditions, which for the Company mainly related to the continual employment of the employee during the vesting period, and in the case of the senior management, until 2018 as noted above, achievement of EPS growth targets, were taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each balance sheet date. The cumulative amount recognised over the vesting period was based on the number of awards that eventually vest. Any market vesting conditions were factored into the fair value of the share-based payment granted. To the extent that share-based payments are granted to employees of the Company’s subsidiaries without charge, the share-based payment is capitalised as part of the cost of investment in subsidiaries. The number of share awards granted by the Company during the year is given in the table below: At the beginning of the year Granted in the year Cash settled in the year Forfeited in the year At the end of the year 2021 000’s 6,573,229 – (1,854,298) (2,219,217) 2020 000’s 8,768,294 2,661,388 – (4,856,453) 2,499,714 6,573,229 The weighted average remaining contractual life for the vesting period outstanding as at 31 December 2021 was 0.5 years (31 December 2020: 1.0 years). The weighted average fair value of shares granted during the year ended 31 December 2021 was US$ nil (31 December 2020: US$ 0.10). Annual Report 2021 149 Financial Statements NOTES TO COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS continued FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2021 12 Long term incentive plans continued Grant date Share price Expected volatility Risk-free rate Expected dividend yield Vesting period Award life LTIP LTIP 29 May 2020 15 November 2019 £0.08 103% 0.48% 0.00% 3 years 3 years £0.09 120% 0.01% 0.00% 3 years 3 years The expected share price volatility of the Company’s shares was determined taking into account the historical share price movements for a three-year period up to the grant date (and of each of the companies in the comparator group). The risk-free return was determined from similarly dated zero coupon UK government bonds at the time the share awards were granted, using historical information taken from the Bank of England’s records. On 15 March 2021, the Remuneration Committee determined that awards granted on 28 March 2018 which were due to vest on 28 March 2021 would be settled in cash, not by the issue of shares as was contractually stipulated, subject to the achievement of the original performance conditions. For the purposes of FRS 102 section 26, this represented a reclassification of these awards from equity-settled to cash-settled. In accordance with FRS 102 section 26, at the date of reclassification a balance of US$ 0.1 million equal to the fair value of the awards at the modification date was deducted from equity. As the fair value at the modification date was lower than the cumulative equity- settled share-based payment charge at that date, no adjustment was made to profit or loss as a result of the modifications. On 9 June 2021, the Company’s Ordinary Shares of 10p each were split into Ordinary Shares of 2p each and deferred shares of 8p each. A consequence of this change will be that the share options issued in prior years will be modified to such that the recipients are granted Ordinary Shares of 2p each, not Ordinary Shares of 10p each. This change represented a modification of the share-based payments for the purposes of FRS 102 section 26. However, as the modification did not result in a favourable change for the employees, no adjustments to the share-based payment charge was required as a result of the change to the Company’s share capital. 13 Reclassification In the prior year the Company recognised amounts owed to Group undertakings net of amounts receivable from Group undertakings. The Company has reclassified amounts receivable from Group undertakings from other payables to other receivables since there is no legal right of offset. Additionally, these balances were expected to be settled after 12 months from the year ended 31 December 2020 and therefore has been presented as a non-current asset in the prior year. The details of the reclassification are included in the table below: Impact on Company statement of financial position Non-current assets Other receivables Amounts receivable from Group undertakings Amounts falling due within one year Other payables Amounts owed to Group undertakings Other payables As previously reported US$’000 Reclassification US$’000 As reclassified US$’000 – – 14,648 727 15,375 2,798 2,798 2,798 – 2,798 2,798 2,798 17,446 727 18,173 14 Events after the reporting period Russia-Ukraine conflict On 24 February 2022, Russia launched ground and air attacks on Ukraine which led to the closure of airports and land borders. The developing situation has the potential to impact GMS operations and presents a risk to the health, safety and welfare of certain GMS employees living in Ukraine. GMS has implemented procedures to provide required support should employees be affected, as well as to ensure continuity across the business. In response to military action launched by Russia, western countries and other global allies imposed an unprecedented package of coordinated sanctions against Russia. The Group has minimal activity with suppliers in Russia and continues to manage its supply chain and has robust procedures in place to avoid any disruption to operations. Overall, the Group does not expect the war in Ukraine, and resulting sanctions, to have a significant impact on operations. 150 Gulf Marine Services PLC GLOSSARY Alternative Performance Measure (APMs) – An APM is a financial measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows, other than a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable financial reporting framework. APMs are non-GAAP measures that are presented to provide readers with additional financial information that is regularly reviewed by management and the Directors consider that they provide a useful indicator of underlying performance. Adjusted results are also an important measure providing useful information as they form the basis of calculations required for the Group’s covenants. However, this additional information presented is not uniformly defined by all companies including those in the Group’s industry. Accordingly, it may not be comparable with similarly titled measures and disclosures by other companies. Additionally, certain information presented is derived from amounts calculated in accordance with IFRS but is not itself an expressly permitted GAAP measure. Such measures should not be viewed in isolation or as an alternative to the equivalent GAAP measure. In response to the Guidelines on APMs issued by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), we have provided additional information on the APMs used by the Group. Adjusted diluted earnings/loss per share – represents the adjusted earnings/loss attributable to equity holders of the Company for the period divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the period, adjusted for the weighted average effect of share options outstanding during the period. The adjusted earnings/loss attributable to equity shareholders of the Company is used for the purpose of basic gain/loss per share adjusted by adding back impairment charges (deduction of reversal of impairment during the year 2021), restructuring charges, exceptional legal costs and costs to acquire new bank facilities. This measure provides additional information regarding earnings per share attributable to the underlying activities of the business. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 31. Adjusted EBITDA – represents operating profit after adding back depreciation (deduction for reversal of impairment during 2021), amortisation, non-operational items and impairment charges. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s underlying performance that management is more directly able to influence in the short term and on a basis comparable from year to year. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. Adjusted EBITDA margin – represents adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue. This measure provides additional information on underlying performance as a percentage of total revenue derived from the Group. Adjusted gross profit/(loss) – represents gross profit/loss after deducting reversal of impairment/adding back impairment charges. This measure provides additional information on the core profitability of the Group. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. Adjusted net profit/(loss) – represents net profit/(loss) after adding back impairment charges and costs of renegotiating bank terms. This measure provides additional information in assessing the Group’s total performance that management is more directly able to influence and, on a basis, comparable from year to year. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30 of these results. Average fleet utilisation – represents the percentage of available days in a relevant period during which the fleet of SESVs is under contract and in respect of which a customer is paying a day rate for the charter of the SESVs. Average fleet utilisation is calculated by adding the total contracted days in the period of each SESV, divided by the total number of days in the period multiplied by the number of SESVs in the fleet. Cost of sales excluding depreciation and amortisation – represents cost of sales excluding depreciation and amortisation. This measure provides additional information of the Group’s cost for operating the vessels. A reconciliation is shown below: Statutory cost of sales Less: depreciation and amortisation 2021 US$’000 69,460 (28,241) 41,291 2020 US$’000 70,864 (28,597) 42,267 Annual Report 2021 151 Financial Statements GLOSSARY continued EBITDA – represents earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, which represents operating profit after adding back depreciation and amortisation. This measure provides additional information of the underlying operating performance of the Group. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. Margin – revenue less cost of sales before depreciation, amortisation and impairment as identified in Note 30 of the consolidated financial statements. Net bank debt – represents the total bank borrowings less cash and cash equivalents. This measure provides additional information of the Group’s financial position. A reconciliation is shown below: Statutory bank borrowings Less: cash and cash equivalents 2021 US$’000 379,526 (8,271) 371,255 2020 US$’000 410,033 (3,798) 406,235 Finance leases are excluded from net bank debt to ensure consistency with definition of the Group’s banking covenants. Net cash flow before debt service – the sum of cash generated from operations and investing activities. Net leverage ratio – the ratio of net bank debt at year end to adjusted EBITDA which is further adjusted for items including but are not limited to reversal of impairment credits/(impairment charges), restructuring costs, exceptional legal costs and non-operational finance related costs in alignment with the terms of our bank facility agreement. This has no impact for the current or prior periods. The reconciliation is shown below: A: Net bank debt, as identified above B: Adjusted EBITDA, as disclosed in Note 30 Net leverage ratio (A/B): 2021 US$’000 371,255 64,124 5.78 Non-operational finance expenses – this pertains to the following items below as disclosed in Note 36, Finance expense. Cost to acquire new bank facility Fair value adjustment on recognition of new debt facility Operational downtime – downtime due to technical failure. 2021 US$’000 (3,165) 1,439 (1,726) 2020 US$’000 406,235 50,449 8.1 2020 US$’000 (15,797) (448) (16,245) Segment adjusted gross profit/loss – represents gross profit/loss after adding back depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges. This measure provides additional information on the core profitability of the Group attributable to each reporting segment. A reconciliation of this measure is provided in Note 30. Underlying performance – day to day trading performance that management are directly able to influence in the short term. 152 Gulf Marine Services PLC OTHER DEFINITIONS Average day rates we calculate the average day rates by dividing total charter hire revenue per month by total hire days per month throughout the year and then calculating a monthly average. Backlog represents firm contracts and extension options held by clients. Backlog equals (charter day rate x remaining days contracted) + ((estimated average Persons On Board x daily messing rate) x remaining days contracted) + contracted remaining unbilled mobilisation and demobilisation fees. Includes extension options. Borrowing rate LIBOR plus margin. Calendar days takes base days at 365 and only excludes periods of time for construction and delivery time for newly constructed vessels. Costs capitalised represent qualifying costs that are capitalised as part of a cost of the vessel rather than being expensed as they meet the recognition criteria of IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. Day rates rate per day charge to customers per hire of vessel as agreed in the contract. Debt Service Cover represents the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to debt service. Demobilisation fee paid for the vessel re-delivery at the end of a contract, in which client is allowed to offload equipment and personnel. DEPS/DLPS diluted earnings/losses per share. Employee retention percentage of staff who continued to be employed during the year (excluding retirements and redundancies) taken as number of resignations during the year divided by the total number of employees as at 31 December. EPC ESG Finance service engineering, procurement and construction. environmental, social and governance. the aggregate of a) Net finance charges for that period; and b) All scheduled payments of principal and any other schedule payments in the nature of principal payable by the Group in that period in respect of financing: i) Excluding any amounts falling due in that period under any overdraft, working capital or revolving facility which were available for simultaneous redrawing under the terms of that facility; ii) Excluding any amount of PIK that accretes in that period; iii) Including the amount of the capital element of any amounts payable under any Finance Lease in respect of that period; and iv) Adjusted as a result of any voluntary or mandatory prepayment GMS core fleet consists of 13 SESVs, with an average age of ten years. Interest Cover represents the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Net finance charges. IOC KPIs Independent Oil Company. Key performance indicators. Lost Time Injuries any workplace injuries sustained by an employee while on the job that prevents them from being able to perform their job for a period of one or more days. Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) the lost time injury rate per 200,000 man hours which is a measure of the frequency of injuries requiring employee absence from work for a period of one or more days. LIBOR London Interbank Offered Rate. Mobilisation fee paid for the vessel readiness at the start of a contract, in which client is allowed to load equipment and personnel. Net finance charges represents finance charges as defined by the terms of the Group’s banking facility for that period less interest income for that period. Net leverage ratio represents the ratio of net bank debt to Adjusted EBITDA. NOC OSW National Oil Company. Offshore Wind. Annual Report 2021 153 Financial Statements OTHER DEFINITIONS continued PIK Payment In Kind. Under the banking documents dated 17 June 2020 and 31 March 2021, PIK is calculated at 5.0% per annum on the total term facilities outstanding amount and reduces to: a) 2.5% per annum when Net Leverage reduces below 5.0x b) Nil when Net Leverage reduces below 4.0x Under the documents dated 31 March 2021, PIK accrues on either 1 July 2021 if the US$ 25 million equity is not raised by 30 June 2021, or from 1 January 2023 if the US$ 50 million is not raised by 31 December 2022. PIK stops accruing at the date on which all loans are paid or discharged in full. Restricted work day case (RWDC) any work-related injury other than a fatality or lost work day case which results in a person being unfit for full performance of the regular job on any day after the occupational injury. Secured backlog represents firm contracts and extension options held by clients. Backlog equals (charter day rate x remaining days contracted) + ((estimated average Persons On Board x daily messing rate)) x remaining days contracted) + contracted remaining unbilled mobilisation and demobilisation fees. Includes extension options. Secured day rates day rates from signed contracts firm plus options held by clients. Secured utilisation contracted days of firm plus option periods of charter hire from existing signed contracts. Security Cover (loan to value) the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of Total Net Bank Debt at that time to the Market Value of the Secured Vessels. SESV Self-Elevating Support Vessels. SG&A spend means that the selling, general and administrative expenses calculated on an accruals basis should be no more than the SG&A maximum spend for any relevant period. Total Recordable Injury Rate (TRIR) calculated on the injury rate per 200,000 man hours and includes all our onshore and offshore personnel and subcontracted personnel. Offshore personnel are monitored over a 24-hour period. Underlying G&A underlying general and administrative (G&A) expenses excluding depreciation and amortisation, restructuring costs, and exceptional legal costs. Utilisation the percentage of calendar days in a relevant period during which an SESV is under contract and in respect of which a customer is paying a day rate for the charter of the SESV. Vessel operating expense Warrants Cost of sales before depreciation, amortisation and impairment, refer to Note 30. Under the banking documents date 31 March 2021, if Warrants are issued on 1 July 2021 because of the failure to raise US$ 25 million by 30 June 2021, half of the issued warrants vest on that date. The other half will only vest on 2 January 2023 if there is a failure to raise US$ 50 million. If warrants are issued on 2 January 2023 because of the failure to raise US$ 50 million all of the issued warrants vest on the same date. All warrants to expire on 30 June 2025 (maturity date of the facilities). 154 Gulf Marine Services PLC Board of Directors Mansour Al Alami Executive Chairman Hassan Heikal Deputy Chairman, Non-Executive Director Rashed Al Jarwan Senior Independent Non-Executive Director Lord Anthony St John of Bletso Independent Non-Executive Director Charbel El Khoury Non-Executive Director Jyrki Koskelo Independent Non-Executive Director CORPORATE INFORMATION Corporate Brokers Panmure Gordon One New Change, London EC4M 9AF Arden Partners plc 125 Old Broad Street London EC2N 1AR Legal Advisers Shearman and Sterling LLP 9 Appold Street London EC2A 2AP Auditors Deloitte LLP 2 New Street Square London EC4A 3BZ Public Relations Advisers Celicourt Communications Limited Orion House 5 Upper St Martin’s Lane London WC2H 9EA Registrar Equiniti Aspect House Spencer Road Lancing West Sussex BN99 6DA Registered Office Gulf Marine Services PLC Masters House 107 Hammersmith Road London W14 0QH Head Office Gulf Marine Services P.O. Box 46046 Abu Dhabi, UAE T: +971 (2) 5028888 F: +971 (2) 5553421 E: IR@gmsplc.com Gulf Marine Services P.O. Box 46046 Abu Dhabi, UAE T: +971 (2) 5028888 F: +971 (2) 5553421 E: IR@gmsplc.com www.gmsplc.com Annual Report 2021 155 Financial Statements OUR CLIENTS 156 Gulf Marine Services PLC This publication was printed with vegetable oil-based inks by an FSC-recognised printer that holds an ISO 14001 certification. The outer cover of this report has been laminated with a biodegradable film. Around 20 months after composting, an additive within the film will initiate the process of oxidation. G U L F M A R I N E S E R V I C E S P L C A n n u a l R e p o r t 2 0 2 1 Gulf Marine Services P.O. Box 46046 Abu Dhabi, UAE T: +971 (2) 5028888 F: +971 (2) 5553421 E: IR@gmsplc.com www.gmsplc.com

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above