Gold Resource Corporation
NYSE Amex: GORO
2010 Annual Report
Gold Resource Corporation is a mining company focused on production and pursuing
development of gold and silver projects that feature low operating cost and high return on capital
invested. The Company has 100% interest in five potential high-grade gold and silver properties
in Mexico’s southern state of Oaxaca.
The Company announced Commercial Production July 1, 2010 from its Oaxaca Mining Unit’s
El Aguila Project.
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
A low-cost gold producer focused on cash flow and dividends
NYSE Amex: GORO
WWW.GOLDRESOURCECORP.COM
100% Interest in
Five Potential
High-Grade Properties
MEXICO
Solaga
El Aguila
Las Margaritas
Alta Gracia
El Rey
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Oaxaca
President’s Letter ........................................................2-3
El Aguila Project ............................................................4
El Aguila Mill ..................................................................5
Production Targets .........................................................6
Exploration .....................................................................7
Environment ..................................................................8
Corporate Citizenship ....................................................9
Management’s Discussion and Analysis ................10-22
Auditors Report ............................................................23
Consolidated Financial Statements ........................24-29
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ..........30-40
Stock Performance ......................................................41
Corporate Information ..................................................42
Gold Resource Corporation
1
2010 Annual Report
“We now enter the next phase in an effort to nearly triple annual pro-
duction to a targeted 200,000 gold equivalent (AuEq) precious metal
ounces or more by 2013, at “zero” cash cost ...”
PR ESI D ENT’S LETTER
Dear Fellow Shareholders,
9-15-2010
Gold Resource Corporation’s vision became a reality as Commercial Production was declared at
the El Aguila Project in Oaxaca, Mexico July 1, 2010. After much focused effort and hard work of
many people, the Company entered the ranks of gold producers, an accomplishment achieved by
few.
Gold Resource Corporation has targeted returning approximately one-third of cash flow generated
from operations back to the shareholders. I am proud to report that the Company has declared
two special dividends in as many months of Commercial Production. Returning a meaningful
dividend back to the owners of the Company, its shareholders, remains an integral part of the core
operating philosophy of Gold Resource Corporation.
Fundamental in our approach to the business of mining is that a project must be able to repay its capital investment in one year
or less. Equally important, is the ability to put these projects into production on an accelerated basis. We have demonstrated
our ability to accelerate project development. By building the El Aguila Project as Federal and State permits were received, we
brought this project online at the earliest possible point in time. We will continue to employ this operating strategy on additional
projects within our Oaxaca Mining Unit with the objective of ultimately having multiple mines feeding the El Aguila mill. We
believe this strategy will keep capital costs on developing additional projects within the Unit to a minimum, while maximizing head
grade through the El Aguila mill.
Many challenging aspects of the mining business, including deposit discovery, permitting, engineering, funding, construction,
establishing a team of professionals and executing Commercial Production are now behind us. We have met these real and com-
plex challenges but our work continues. We now enter the next phase in an effort to nearly triple annual production to a targeted
200,000 gold equivalent (AuEq) precious metal ounces or more by 2013, at “zero” cash cost using industry standard base metal
byproduct credits.
The value of a mining company starts with its resources in the ground. At the El Aguila Project, the resources drilled to date are
impressive; the geologic model developing is exceptional. World class grades in the context of a world class geologic setting
amplify our belief that this system is only just beginning to show its potential.
Gold Resource Corporation
2
2010 Annual Report
Our current production comes from the El Aguila open pit deposit, viewed as a short-term cash flow generator. This open pit is
more than ninety percent mined at this point, with ore stockpiled awaiting processing over the next ten months. El Aguila open pit
production targets are 60,000 - 70,000 ounces of gold at an estimated cash cost of approximately $200 per ounce using our mill’s
flotation circuit. However, we believe the primary value and longevity of the Aguila Project is the La Arista’s high-grade polymetal-
lic underground mine, which is currently under development. Our goal is to begin stockpiling La Arista ore by the fourth quarter of
2010, to make a seamless production transition from processing El Aguila open pit ore to Arista underground ore by mid-2011.
We remain focused on increasing cash flow from operations and adding ounces from our known deposits, primarily focusing on La
Arista. Today, the Arista deposit is open in both strike and depth and the potential exists to double this deposit by drilling the vein
extensions. This new drilling, coupled with an anticipated more formal reserve report, should bring additional value to sharehold-
ers. In addition to El Aguila, our Oaxaca Mining Unit is comprised of four more properties: El Rey, Las Margaritas, Alta Gracia and
Solaga, which themselves contain exciting exploration targets.
As we enter this new phase as a gold producer and dividend payer with world class exploration potential, we thank those who have
shared in our vision along the way and those who continue to support Gold Resource Corporation. It is with your help and with the
hard work from the many people at Gold Resource Corporation and its Mexican subsidiaries that we continue to bring our vision to
life.
Sincerely,
Jason Reid
President
Gold Resource Corporation
Please see Company’s 10-K filing for “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.
Gold Resource Corporation 3
2010 Annual Report
EL A GUI LA PROJECT
2009-2010 COMPANY MILESTONES
COMPANY OBJECTIVES
May 21, 2009
Expanded La Arista Mineralization
August 13, 2009
Received Federal El Aguila open pit permit
Increase production
Targeting 200k oz AuEq by 2013 @
“zero”cash cost
August 24, 2009
Expanded land position along trend
Increase ounces
Expand known deposits, add new discoveries
November 2, 2009
Commissioned crushing plant
December 1, 2009
Nearly doubled Arista’s estimated mine life
December 14, 2009
Approved for Arista underground mine
Increase cash flow
Dividend distributions when possible
Seamless transition from processing open pit to under-
December 9, 2009
Commissioned Aguila mill equipment
ground ores
January 25, 2010
Aguila mill processed ore
February 3, 2010
Produced first concentrates
OPERATING MINE
El Aguila open pit mine
April 14, 2010
Shipped first concentrates for sale
June 2, 2010
New gold / silver mineralization discovered
Gold deposit with silver credits
Target 60,000 - 70,000 oz Gold produced (7/1/2010-7/1/2011)
Estimated $200 cash cost / oz target
July 1, 2010
Commercial production declared
July 29, 2010
Initial special cash dividend declared
August 30, 2010
NYSE Amex listing
August 31, 2010
Second special dividend declared
MINE DEVELOPMENT
La Arista underground mine
Estimated 2,900,000 tonnes @
15grams (0.5 oz) /tonne precious metal gold equivalent
“Zero” cash cost/oz estimate using by-product credits
(copper, lead, zinc)
Deposit “open” on strike and depth
Longevity of operations
“Gold Resource Corporation commenced Commercial Production July 1, 2010 from its El Aguila
Project’s operations in the southern state of Oaxaca, Mexico. The Company continues to be
pleased with the Project’s performance and by using cash flow generated from operations the
Board of Directors declared another special cash dividend increasing the year to date dividend
payment to $0.06 per share.” August 31, 2010 Company Press Release
Please see Company’s 10-K filing for “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.
Gold Resource Corporation
4
2010 Annual Report
EL AGUILA MILL
El Aguila Mill’s flexible design contains both a flotation and agitated
leach circuit. The Company’s long term objective is to develop mul-
tiple mines from its Oaxaca Mining Unit feeding ore to the mill. This
strategy targets reduced capital expenditures on developing additional
mines within the Oaxaca Mining Unit and aims to maximize head grade
through the mill.
Construction of the Aguila Mill and Project infrastructure was complet-
ed for approximately $35 million, a low capital expenditure for a mill of
its capacity in the industry.
The operating flotation circuit is built to process 440,000 tonnes per
year of the Company’s largest deposit discovered to date, La Arista
polymetallic (gold and silver with copper, lead and zinc byproduct
credits) deposit. The Company’s current ½ ounce per tonne gold
equivalent precious metals (AuEq) average estimate and 94% recovery
target 200,000 AuEq ounces per year production by 2013.
EL AGUILA MILL
Flexible Design
Flotation circuit
440,000 tonnes/ year capacity
Agitated leach circuit
100,000 tonnes/ year capacity
Capital Expenditure (including infrastructure)
$35 million
Ability to expand mill capacity with modifications
Please see Company’s 10-K filing for “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.
Gold Resource Corporation 5
2010 Annual Report
OPERATING MINE
El Aguila open pit mine
Gold deposit with silver credits
Target 60,000 - 70,000 oz Gold produced (7/1/2010-7/1/2011)
Estimated $200 cash cost / oz target
MINE DEVELOPMENT
La Arista underground mine
Estimated 2,900,000 tonnes @
15grams (0.5 oz) /tonne precious metal gold equivalent
“Zero” cash cost/oz estimate using by-product credits
(copper, lead, zinc)
Deposit “open” on strike and depth
Longevity of operations
PROD UCTION TARGETS
Calendar Year-end Production Target Estimates
PRODUCTION TARGETS
s
z
O
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
E
u
A
225,000
200,000
175,000
150,000
125,000
100,000
75,000
50,000
25,000
0
200,000/yr
@5 yrs
155,000
55,000
35,000
35,000
12/31/2010E 12/31/2011E 12/31/2012E 12/31/2013E
Open Pit
La Arista
Gold Resource Corporation announced
Commercial Production at its El Aguila
Project July 1, 2010, processing gold
and silver ore from the Aguila open pit.
The Company targets production of
60,000 to 70,000 ounces of gold, at an
estimated cash cost of $200 per ounce,
from the El Aguila open pit by July 1,
2011.
Longevity of operations is targeted
from the La Arista polymetallic high-
grade gold and silver deposit with base
metal byproduct credits of copper,
lead and zinc. La Arista mine develop-
ment is underway with the goal to start
stockpiling Arista ore by Q4 2010. Any
ore stockpiled would assist in a seam-
less transition from processing Aguila
open pit ore to Arista underground ore
by July 1, 2011.
The Company’s aggressive production
profile targets a ramp up to year three
and beyond of 200,000 precious metal
gold equivalent ounces from its Arista
deposit.
Please see Company’s 10-K filing for “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.
Gold Resource Corporation
6
2010 Annual Report
APRIL 14, 2009: FIRST CONCENTRATE SHIPPED
5 Potential High-Grade Properties
Consolidated 3 Historic Mining Districts
Epithermal Open Pit and Vein Deposits
EXPLORATION
The Company’s Oaxaca Mining Unit consists of five
potential high-grade properties in the southern state of
Oaxaca, Mexico. Three of five properties consolidate a
sixteen kilometer mineralized trend. The Company in-
tends to expand upon known deposits and discover new
ones with the long term goal of having multiple mines
feeding ore to the strategically located El Aguila mill.
La Arista Mineralized Material(1): Company estimate of
2,962,000 tonnes @
Au 6.5 grams / tonne
Ag 506 grams / tonne
Cu 0.60%
Pb 2.24%
Zn 6.75%
•
•
•
•
Potential near term expansion of Arista vein system
Current mineralization drilled over 500 meters strike & 500 meters depth
Epithermal models in Mexico can be 1000+ meters deep
Vein system open in strike and depth
La Arista Veins Mineralized Material Polygonal Envelopes
200 m
100 m
EXPLORATIO N
Caldera 3
La Arista Deposit
Caldera 2
El Aguila Deposit
El Aire Deposit
Exploration potential of a portion of El Aguila Project
Geologic setting
North 70 West regional structural trend
Nested calderas
Resurgent domes
Piston like plug
Expansion potential of 3 existing deposits
El Aguila, La Arista, El Aire
Exploration targets include
Cerro Colorado, la Escondita, Salina
Caldera 1
Blanca, Paredonas, El Chacal, Fossil Hill, The Switchback, La Curva, ...
Exploration targets over ~4 km of 16km
mineralized trend
Baja vein 12/09
Long section
Baja vein 12/09
Long section
(1)Internal Estimate, Not SEC Proven and Probable Reserves
99% of Land Consessions
Remain to be Drilled
Please see Company’s 10-K filing for “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements”.
Gold Resource Corporation
7
2010 Annual Report
Epithermal systems are some of the highest grade and most sought after deposits in the world
ENVIR ONMENT
ENVIRONMENT
Gold Resource Corporation is committed to
protecting and enhancing the environment at
its operations. At the El Aguila Project, the mill
design, the ancillary facilities and the fact that
the majority of the mineralization discovered to
date will be mined from underground, all result
in a relatively small footprint limiting the Project’s
environmental impact.
The Aguila mill’s tailings impoundment facility ex-
ceeds Mexico’s tailing impoundment standards.
In addition to being double lined, the second liner
is a special clay membrane that responds as leak
prevention if the first liner is ever compromised.
The Company has an ongoing plant nursery
and native seedlings program to provide for re-
vegetation responsibilities and to begin reclama-
tion as soon as an area is no longer required for
operations.
Gold Resource Corporation’s mine village, Haci-
enda Minera Tres Palmas, was constructed using
recycled materials including recycled plastic
bottles made into plastic block walls covered with
a stucco finish. This “green” construction tech-
nique saved over 2 million plastic bottles from the
landfill.
Gold Resource Corporation
8
2010 Annual Report
Double Lined Tailings FacililityGreen ConstructionEarth Day Advocacy Programs
CORPO RATE CITIZE NS H IP
COMMUNITY ACTION
Gold Resource Corporation is committed to
provide a positive impact in the local communi-
ties in which it operates. Community benefits
include employment opportunities, healthcare,
city infrastructure, career training, educational
scholarships, sustainable development and
multiple partnership programs.
The Company’s focus on hiring locally first,
coupled with job training and career building, will
add significant employment to the surrounding
area both directly and indirectly through related
services. Higher learning scholarships for stu-
dents will assist the community while sharing the
vision that education will bring value far beyond
company operations. The construction of a
health and dental clinic also provides benefits for
the local community members. Gold Resource
Corporation is pleased to continue the success-
ful dental program it initiated over five years ago.
As Gold Resource Corporation’s projects evolve,
so too will its participation as a community mem-
ber. Our past, current and anticipated future
support will assist the local communities. We
understand our long-term success is only pos-
sible if we create a strong and positive partner-
ship at the local level.
Gold Resource Corporation
9
2010 Annual Report
Children’s Dental ClinicCommitment to Hire LocallyStudent Scholarships
M AN A GEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALY SI S
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
This discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Gold Resource Cor-
poration should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. These financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Except for the historical informa-
tion, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our
actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements and we caution you not to put undue
reliance on such statements. Additional information about us, including certain risk factors containing risks which
may impact our future performance, are available in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC and avail-
able on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Introduction
The following table containing selected financial information is presented from our audited consolidated financial
statements for each year. The subsequent narrative discussion analyzes our operating results for the three fiscal years
ended December 31, 2009 and our financial condition at December 31, 2009, with a particular emphasis on the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Selected Financial Data
Year Ended December 31
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Operating Data
Net loss from operations
Other income
Net loss
Basic & diluted loss per share
Weighted average shares
$ (34,183,804) $ (26,348,812) $ (8,318,855) $ (2,743,851) $ (1,224,085)
54,497 333,609 242,513
6,174
(8,076,342) (2,686,762) (1,217,711)
(34,129,307) (26,015,203)
(0.28) (0.13) (0.08)
(0.78) (0.76)
20,218,659 16,164,715
43,764,703 34,393,854 28,645,038
57,089
Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents
20,701,405 3,737,468 22,051,156
Total current assets
1,726,278 812,219 352,429
Property and equipment, net
Land and mineral rights 226,610 226,610 152,522
22,664,758 4,781,018 22,557,576
Total assets
$ 6,752,325 $ 3,534,578 $ 22,007,216 $ 7,660,258 $ 176,182
191,159
54,352
--
7,964,118 246,980
7,866,370
96,279
--
Current liabilities
Long-term obligations
Shareholders’ equity
724,439 1,753,285 768,452 451,163 33,607
1,991,987
--
19,948,332 3,027,733 21,789,124 7,512,955 213,373
--
--
--
Gold Resource Corporation 10
2010 Annual Report
[Note to reader: the following discussion has been reproduced from our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 15, 2010. As a result, certain information contained herein regarding our business operations has
now become historical and may not reflect recent activity.]
Overview
We expect to commence commercial production at our Mexico facility during 2010. Prior to 2010, none of our prop-
erties were in production, and consequently, we have never produced revenue or cash flow from the sale of minerals and
have relied on equity financing to fund our operations to date.
Since August 2006, we raised capital through various sales of common stock, yielding gross proceeds of approxi-
mately $85,000,000. Our most recent financings were part of a strategic alliance with Hochschild Mining Holdings Limited
(Hochschild), a mid tier gold and silver producer headquartered in Lima, Peru and listed on the London Stock Exchange.
Pursuant to a series of agreements, Hochschild purchased 1,670,000 shares of our common stock for gross proceeds of
$5,010,000 in December 2008; 4,330,000 shares of our common stock for $12,990,000 in February 2009; 5,000,000 shares
of our common stock for gross proceeds of $20,000,000 in June 2009; 1,954,795 shares of common stock for gross pro-
ceeds of $16,000,000 in December 2009; and 600,000 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $5,172,000 in March
2010. Hochschild has invested a total of $59,172,000 in private placements with our company for a 27.8% ownership share
and has purchased an additional 1% share in the open market for a total ownership of 28.7%. We have used the funds
primarily to fund exploration and construction at the El Aguila Project. In 2007, we commenced activities that we hope will
allow us to successfully mine the deposits at El Aguila, including the construction of a processing mill and other infrastruc-
ture.
During 2009, we continued efforts to construct our mine and mill and complete other activities necessary to place
our El Aguila Project into production. We began commissioning those facilities in late 2009 and anticipate generating rev-
enue from the sale of precious metals in 2010.
We continue to refine our initial and ongoing capital requirements. As an exploration stage company, there is
significant uncertainty in our estimates regarding both future costs and future revenue. We may require additional capital
resources to complete our plans.
Exploration Stage Company. We are considered an exploration stage company since we have not demonstrated
the existence of proven or probable reserves in accordance with certain regulatory requirements that would be costly for us
to meet. At this time, we do not believe that meeting those requirements is the best use of our limited capital resources. In
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, all expenditures for exploration and evalua-
tion of our properties have been expensed as incurred. Furthermore, unless mineralized material is classified as proven or
Gold Resource Corporation 11
2010 Annual Report
probable reserves, substantially all expenditures for mine and mill construction have been or will be expensed as
incurred. Certain expenditures, such as for rolling stock or other general purpose equipment, may be capitalized, subject
to our evaluation of the possible impairment of the asset. Since substantially all of our expenditures to date, including
construction of the mill, have been expensed and we expect to expense additional expenditures during 2010, most of our
investment in mining properties and equipment does not appear as an asset on our balance sheet. Our accounting treat-
ment, regarding the classification of construction expenditures as an operating expense rather than as a capital asset has
caused us to report large losses during the last two years. Although the majority of expenditures for the El Aguila Project
were completed during 2009, we expect underground mine construction to continue in future years. In comparison to other
mining companies that capitalize development expenditures because they have exited the exploration stage, we will report
larger losses or lesser profits during periods of construction. In our financial reports we provide additional information that
presents operating expenses differentiated from construction expenses to provide for a better understanding of our opera-
tions.
Exploration of our properties accelerated in late 2006 and continued throughout 2009. From inception to December
31, 2009, we expensed approximately $24,485,000 on the exploration and evaluation of our various properties, substantially
all of which has been spent on the currently active properties known as El Aguila. In addition, we have expensed, from in-
ception to December 31, 2009, approximately $35,496,000 in design, engineering, and construction costs, all of which apply
to the El Aguila Project.
A more detailed breakdown of the El Aguila Project construction costs is as follows:
$
Original Design Construction Costs
Permits
Mill
Equipment and Transportation
Installation and Buildings
Engineering Design and Construction Management
Infrastructure
Roads
Waterline and system
Tailings Impoundment Phase I
850,000
1,234,000
2,717,000
31,812,000
264,000
10,489,000
10,690,000
5,568,000
Subtotal
Other Construction Costs
Community Relations
Employee Housing
Tailings Impoundment Phase II
Subtotal
Total Construction Costs
Plan of Operation
539,000
1,880,000
1,265,000
3,684,000
$35,496,000
In April 2007, we decided to move forward with construction at the El Aguila property in an effort to commence
commercial production. Our decision was made based upon drilling data that we believe provides evidence of mineralized
material in amounts sufficient to proceed with construction activities. However, we have not commenced a feasibility study
that would allow us to classify any of our mineralized material as proven or probable reserves, as those terms are defined
Gold Resource Corporation 12
2010 Annual Report
by the SEC in Industry Guide 7, “Description of Property by Issuers Engaged or to Be Engaged in Significant Mining Opera-
tions.” The SEC definition of “reserve” is “that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or
produced at the time of the reserve determination.”
Our ability to demonstrate the existence of proven or probable reserves would require us to continue exploration
drilling that demonstrated the existence of sufficient mineralized material and to complete a positive feasibility study. A
feasibility study must demonstrate with reasonable certainty that the deposit can be legally and economically extracted and
produced. At this time, we have neither undertaken these additional activities nor implemented plans to undertake these
activities in the future. Accordingly, the mineralized material identified by us should not be considered proven or probable
mineral reserves. Additionally, the assumptions used by us in our decision to undertake construction of the mill and mine
may prove to be inaccurate. Thus, we may never be able to recover sufficient mineralized material to become profitable.
Anticipated Production. In 2008 we engaged Lyntek, Inc. of Denver, Colorado, to design and build the mill at the El
Aguila Project. The mill is designed to process 850 to 1,100 tonnes of ore per day, depending on ore type, through a flota-
tion section, and 150 to 250 tonnes of ore per day, depending upon ore type, through an agitated leach section. Mining by
open pit methods is accomplished under contract with a third party contractor. In December 2009, we began commission-
ing the El Aguila mill. We produced our first concentrate in February 2010. As of March 10, 2010 we are in the process of
ramping up and optimizing mill production.
Our immediate goal is to reach “commercial production” in the first quarter of 2010. Commercial production for our
purposes is achieved when the mill throughput and recoveries are 80% of design. Prior to achieving commercial produc-
tion, any sales of concentrates are applied against costs and are not considered revenue.
If commercial production is achieved from the open pit gold ore, any silver contained in the mineralization will be
produced as a by-product, revenue from which will help offset the costs of producing the gold. In the following year, if activi-
ties go as planned, we intend to undertake production of gold from an underground mine at the nearby La Arista vein. As of
March 15, 2010 construction of the decline ramp related to our proposed underground mine is underway. A portion of the
proceeds from our equity financing in December 2009 is dedicated for this purpose, and those funds are part of our re-
stricted cash. Since we believe the La Arista Vein area also contains base metals such as copper, lead, and zinc, we intend
to produce those metals as by-products, any revenue from which would help offset the costs of producing gold and silver.
We expect that the ore from both the near-surface deposit and the anticipated underground mine will be processed at the El
Aguila mill.
In October 2007, we acquired an additional parcel of land which comprises approximately five hectares and is
located adjacent to the community of San Jose de Gracia. We completed construction of an employee housing facility for
the El Aguila Project, as well as a health clinic which will be available to employees and local residents. The facility encom-
passes 10 buildings, including a cafeteria, and can house approximately 50 people.
Construction at the La Arista Vein. We have begun development of the underground La Arista vein. A third party
contractor has been hired and is presently driving a decline haulage ramp, a second ventilation and emergency ramp and
additional developments. We plan to construct a surface facility to service this underground mine.
A portion of the proceeds of the most recent private placement, in the amount of $8,000,000, have been reserved
for construction of this underground mine and facilities. However, since we are still in the process of planning the design
Gold Resource Corporation 13
2010 Annual Report
and construction of those facilities, we have not yet determined whether that amount will be sufficient to complete the nec-
essary work to begin mining of the underground mineralization. If we are successful in completing the underground facilities
and commencing mining at this portion of our property, we expect that the ore will be processed at our nearby mill.
Mexico Income Taxes. On October 1, 2007, Mexico enacted changes to its tax system that generally took effect be-
ginning January 1, 2008. Those changes include the creation of a “flat tax” (so-called because the computation of income
subject to the tax excludes a number of the deductions generally included in a more traditional determination of taxable
income). The Mexican tax system continues to include a “regular” income tax. In general, enterprises operating in Mexico
will be required to pay the greater of the tax computed under the regular tax and the flat tax. The tax is new and some of its
provisions are ambiguous. While we do not expect the flat tax to have an effect on us for either the 2008 or 2009 tax years,
we estimate that we could incur flat tax liability beginning in tax year 2010. The flat tax computation excludes certain deduc-
tions for operating loss carry-forwards and amortization, depletion, and depreciation expense. Therefore, the new tax law
may limit the future tax benefit that would have otherwise been available from our investment in mineral properties.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2009, we had working capital of $19,976,966, consisting of current assets of $20,701,405 and
current liabilities of $724,439. This represents an increase of $17,992,783 from the working capital balance of $1,984,183
as of December 31, 2008 and reflects the proceeds of recently completed equity sales. Our current assets consist primar-
ily of cash which is deposited in short term, interest bearing accounts. Consistent with our plans, we continued to consume
working capital to fund our exploration and construction activities and other operating expenses, and we replenished our
working capital through the sale of common stock.
We have never received revenue from gold or other mineral sales. We currently expect to commence sales of gold
and silver upon reaching commercial production of our El Aguila processing facility during 2010, but we cannot guarantee
that we will meet our expected timetable. Any revenue generated from the sale of gold or silver will be used to pay for op-
erating costs first and then to supplement our existing cash for construction of the underground mine, additional exploration
and other working capital needs.
We have historically primarily relied on equity financings to fund our operations. From inception through December
31, 2009, we received $95,740,373 in cash, services, stock options, and other consideration through issuance of our com-
mon stock. As of December 31, 2009, we did not have any outstanding debt. We believe that we will continue to fund our
future working capital requirements through the sale of equity, and eventually through cash flow from operations, and we
have not made arrangements to borrow funds for working capital requirements. However, we may consider debt financing if
market conditions allow.
In December 2008, we entered into a strategic alliance agreement with Hochschild. Pursuant to the strategic alli-
ance agreement, Hochschild was granted an option to purchase shares of our restricted common stock and a first right of
refusal to participate in any equity financing transactions we undertake until such time as we produce at least 4,000 ounces
of gold in a 45-day period. Following that production benchmark, Hochschild may participate in equity financing transac-
tions to the extent of their ownership interest. Hochschild exercised its option in February 2009, and we sold 4,330,000
shares of restricted common stock to Hochschild at a price of $3.00 per share for total proceeds of $12,990,000. Hochs-
child also exercised its first right of refusal to provide us with additional equity financing, and on June 30, 2009, we entered
into a subscription agreement with Hochschild to sell 5,000,000 additional shares of restricted common stock at a price
of $4.00 per share, or a total of $20,000,000. That transaction was completed in two tranches, the last of which closed in
July 2009. We agreed to reserve $4,000,000 of the proceeds for exploration activities, and the $4,000,000 was deposited
into a restricted cash account. Also pursuant to the right of first refusal, on December 17, 2009, we sold 1,954,795 shares
of restricted common stock at $8.185 per share to Hochschild for gross proceeds of $16,000,000. We agreed to reserve
$8,000,000 of the proceeds for underground mining expenses at the La Arista vein. Subsequent to the year ended De-
cember 31, 2009, we conducted a new financing transaction with Hochschild whereby we sold 600,000 shares of restricted
common stock at $8.62 per share for gross proceeds of $5,172,000.
Gold Resource Corporation 14
2010 Annual Report
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we spent $7,811,371 on the exploration and evaluation of our properties,
predominantly at our El Aguila Project. This compares to $8,171,396 spent during the year ended December 31, 2008.
While we continued our exploration program to further delineate the area of mineralized material, our emphasis has shifted
to construction of the mine and mill. Our most significant expenditures for 2009 were for the construction of the mill and as-
sociated infrastructure. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we spent $20,994,436 on engineering and construction
activities. This compares to $14,501,461 spent during the year ended December 31, 2008, and reflects the acceleration of
construction.
Our most significant expenditures for 2010 are expected to be costs associated with the second phase of our tail-
ings facility, achieving ramp up and optimization to commercial production, the continued development of the underground
mine and exploration. Furthermore, we continue to incur operating expenses approximating $200,000 per month for sala-
ries and other overhead. We expect to continue depleting our working capital until such time, if ever, we successfully reach
commercial production and generate cash flow from the production and sale of gold and other metals.
Although we expect to commence gold production during 2010, it is uncertain if we will be successful. Furthermore,
the amount of revenue generated during the start-up phase of a mining operation is difficult to predict and tends to be highly
variable. Our costs to enter the production phase may be greater than we anticipate. We may require additional funding
to complete our existing plans and we would be dependent upon additional financing to expand our exploration efforts. We
may seek additional funding during the next twelve months.
Net cash used in operating activities was $44,875,201 during the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
$23,005,822 during 2008, an increase of $21,869,379. We accelerated our operating expenditures consistent with our plan
to commence production during 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1,204,253, compared to $657,816
for the year ended December 31, 2008, all representing capital expenditures. Although most of our exploration stage
expenditures are recorded as an expense rather than an investment, we capitalize the acquisition cost of land and mineral
rights and certain equipment that has alternative future uses or significant salvage value, including rolling stock, furniture,
and electronics. During 2009, we acquired additional vehicles and capital equipment, and we filed mineral concessions with
the Mexican government. During 2008, our capital expenditures primarily included rolling stock and earth moving equip-
ment.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $49,174,000, consisting of
proceeds from the Hochschild financings previously discussed and proceeds of $184,000 from the exercise of stock options.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, financing activities provided cash of $5,191,000, consisting of $5,010,000 proceeds
from the Hochschild strategic alliance discussed above and proceeds of $181,000 from the exercise of stock options.
The balance of cash and equivalents increased to $6,752,325 as of December 31, 2009 from $3,534,578 as of
December 31, 2008, a net increase in cash of $3,217,747. We expect to continue our plan of raising funds from equity
sales if necessary and to expend our cash for exploration stage activities until such time, if ever, we successfully commence
production and generate cash flow from the production and sale of gold and other metals.
December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, we had working capital of $1,984,183, consisting of current assets of
$3,737,468 and current liabilities of $1,753,285. Our current assets consisted primarily of cash.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, our cash decreased by $18,472,638 as a result of our exploration, con-
struction and investment activities. Operating expenses totaled $26,348,812, which, reduced by non-cash expenses such
as stock-based compensation, amortization of equipment, and changes in assets and liabilities, resulted in $23,005,822 of
net cash used in operating activities. The significant amount of cash used in operating activities is attributable to our deci-
sion to begin constructing the mill and related facilities at our El Aguila Project. Cash used in investing activities totaled
Gold Resource Corporation 15
2010 Annual Report
$657,816 resulting solely from capital expenditures. We received $5,191,000 as a result of financing activities in 2008.
Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we reported a net loss of $34,129,307, or $0.78 per share, compared to
a net loss of $26,015,203, or $0.76 per share for the year ended December 31, 2008. In neither year did we report any
revenue from the sale of gold or other minerals. Our only revenue since inception has consisted of interest income. We
currently expect to commence sales of gold and silver upon commissioning of our El Aguila processing facility during 2010,
but we cannot guarantee that we will meet our expected timetable.
Total costs and expenses in the year ended December 31, 2009 were $34,183,804 compared to $26,348,812 in the
comparable period of 2008, an increase of $7,834,992 or 29.7%. The additional expenditures reflect our increasing activi-
ties at the El Aguila Project. Total mineral property costs increased $6,132,950 or 27%, for the year ended December 31,
2009 to $28,805,807 from $22,672,857 for the comparable period in 2008. The property exploration and evaluation com-
ponent decreased $360,025 or 4.4 %, from $8,171,396 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $7,811,371 for the year
ended December 31, 2009. Our exploration and other drilling activity temporarily decreased as we focused our efforts on
engineering and construction.
The engineering and construction cost component during the year ended December 31, 2009 was $20,994,436,
compared to $14,501,461 during the comparable period in 2008. As more fully described in the preceding discussions of
our liquidity and capital resources, we accelerated construction of the mine and mill site and infrastructure during 2009.
General and administrative expenses increased $1,658,997 or 46.7% to $5,211,004 for the fiscal year ended De-
cember 31, 2009 as compared to $3,552,007 for the comparable period last year. The component of general and adminis-
trative expense representing stock option compensation expense was $2,843,506 for the year ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $1,956,806 for the comparable period in 2008. We use an option pricing model to estimate the value of stock
options granted to officers, directors, employees and consultants. It is difficult to estimate the value of options that we grant.
The options are subject to significant restrictions and cannot be purchased or sold on the open market. Therefore, there is
no objective and independent valuation measurement for them. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton model, which requires
considerable judgment selecting the subjective assumptions that are critical to the results produced by the model, to calcu-
late the estimated fair value. We record the estimated fair value as an expense on a pro-rata basis over the vesting period
of the options.
During 2009, we granted options to officers and directors to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $3.95 per share, all of which vested immediately. The estimated value of those options using
the Black-Scholes-Merton model was $2,575,000. We also granted options to an employee to purchase 75,000 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $7.00 per share. The estimated value of those options using the Black-Scholes-
Merton model was $331,787 which will be recognized on a pro-rata basis over the three year vesting period. During 2009,
we also recognized a portion of the fair value of options issued during previous periods, pro-rated over the vesting period.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we granted a total of 1,320,000 stock options with an estimated value
of $2,508,114 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. We granted options to officers and directors to purchase an aggre-
gate of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.40 per share, all of which vested immediately. We
also granted stock options to an investor relations consultant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $4.45 per share, all of which vested immediately. We granted stock options to employees covering 270,000 shares
of common stock at a weighted average price of $3.91. Those options will vest over the next three years. During 2008, we
also recognized a portion of the fair value of options issued during previous periods, pro-rated over the vesting period.
We also record share-based compensation for shares of common stock issued in exchange for goods and services.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not grant any shares of common stock as compensation. During the
Gold Resource Corporation 16
2010 Annual Report
year ended December 31, 2008, we issued 10,000 shares of common stock valued at $42,470 as partial compensation for
investor relations services.
The other components of general and administrative expense, including salaries and benefits, professional fees,
investor relations, and travel, increased to $1,688,569 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 from $1,344,284
during the comparable period in 2008, an increase of $344,285 or 26%. There were no significant changes in this com-
ponent of our cost structure, although we increased activity levels as we prepare the El Aguila Project for production. We
anticipate these costs may further increase if we commence commercial production.
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 decreased to $54,497 compared to $333,609 for the com-
parable period of 2008, a decrease of $279,112 or 83.8%, primarily representing lower interest rates and decreased depos-
its in short term interest bearing accounts.
Our mining operations are located in Mexico and we primarily transact business in Mexican pesos. Our reporting
currency is the US dollar. Changes in the rate of currency exchange between the Mexican peso and the US dollar create
translation gains and losses, which are reported as a component of other comprehensive income. For the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded a currency translation loss of $967,600 and a gain of $63,536, respectively.
Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
For the year ended December 31, 2008 we reported a net loss of $26,015,203, or $0.76 per share, compared to a
net loss of $8,076,342, or $0.28 per share for 2007. We expect to incur losses until such time, if ever, we begin generating
significant revenue from operations.
In neither year did we report any revenue from the sale of gold or other minerals. Our only income since inception
has consisted of interest income.
Total costs and expenses were $26,348,812 in 2008 compared to $8,318,855 in 2007, an increase of $18,029,957
or 217%. The additional expenditures reflect our increasing activities at the El Aguila project. Mineral property costs, includ-
ing exploration and evaluation, increased $2,439,625 from $5,731,771 for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $8,171,396
for the year ended December 31, 2008. We continued our exploration of the El Aguila property in 2008. We conducted
limited exploration on the El Rey property.
Engineering and construction costs were $14,501,461 in 2008 compared to nil in 2007. As more fully described in
the preceding discussions of our expenditures, we commenced construction of the mine and mill site and other infrastruc-
ture during 2008.
General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased to $3,552,007 compared to
$2,539,604 during 2007, an increase of $1,012,403 or 40%. As explained below, there was a significant increase in non-
cash stock option compensation, partially reduced by decreases in other items.
The component of general and administrative expense representing non-cash stock option compensation expense
was $1,956,806 for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $99,482 for 2007. We use the Black-Scholes-Merton
model to estimate the value of stock options granted to officers, directors, employees and consultants.
During 2008, we granted a total of 1,320,000 stock options with an estimated value of $2,508,114. We granted op-
tions to officers and directors to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.40 per share, all of
which vested immediately. We also granted stock options to an investor relations consultant to purchase 50,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $4.45 per share, all of which vested immediately. We also granted options to employ-
ees covering 270,000 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $3.91. Those options will vest over the next
Gold Resource Corporation 17
2010 Annual Report
three years.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we granted stock options to a public relations consultant to purchase
50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.68 per share, all of which vested in 2007. The estimated fair
value of those options was $83,192.
The component of general and administrative expense representing a non-cash expense for grants of common
stock was $42,470 for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to $630,968 for 2007. Shares of common stock
issued by us in exchange for services are recorded as an expense, the amount of which is determined by reference to the
market prices of our stock reported by the OTC Bulletin Board.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we issued 10,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at $42,470
as partial compensation for investor relations services. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we issued 185,000
restricted shares of common stock valued at $630,968 as partial compensation for consulting services.
Cash compensation costs included in general and administrative expense decreased to $716,057 during 2008
from $880,098 during 2007. Certain cash compensation attributed to 2007 was replaced by non-cash compensation during
2008. Professional fees increased to $368,975 in 2008 compared to $234,154 in 2007, an increase of $134,821, which re-
flects our increasing corporate and administrative activities. Investor relations expenses decreased to $167,732 during 2008
from $342,083 during 2007. There were finders fees associated with the private placement in December 2007 that were not
repeated in 2008.
Interest income increased to $333,609 for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $242,513 for 2007, an
increase of $91,096, or 38%, representing higher deposits in short term interest bearing accounts pending utilization in our
exploration, construction and operating activities.
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded currency translation gains (losses) of $63,536 and
($89,939), respectively.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of and subsequent to December 31, 2009, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
Our known obligations at fiscal year end are set forth in the table below:
Contractual Obligations
Purchase Obligations(1)
Total
Total
$ 662,000
$ 662,000
Less than 1-3
1 year years
$ 662,000
$ 662,000
--
--
3-5 More than 5
years years
--
--
--
--
(1) Represents amounts due to our executive officers pursuant to their respective employment agreements with our com-
pany.
Critical Accounting Policies
We believe that application of the following accounting policies, which are critical to our financial position and results
of operations, requires significant judgments and estimates on the part of management.
Gold Resource Corporation 18
2010 Annual Report
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently un-
certain. Estimates that are critical to the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the identification and valu-
ation of proven and probable reserves, obligations for environmental, reclamation, and closure matters, estimates related
to asset impairments of long lived assets and investments, classification of expenditures as either an asset or an expense,
valuation of deferred tax assets, and the likelihood of loss contingencies Management bases its estimates and judgements
on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are revised periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected
in the financial statements in the period it is determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Proven and Probable Reserves. The definition of proven and probable reserves is set forth in SEC Industry Guide
7. Proven reserves are reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, work-
ings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection,
sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth
and mineral content of reserves are well-established. Probable reserves are reserves for which quantity and grade and/or
quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and
measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than
that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. In addition, reserves cannot
be considered proven and probable until they are supported by a feasibility study, indicating that the reserves have had the
requisite geologic, technical and economic work performed and are economically and legally extractable at the time of the
reserve determination.
Mineral Acquisition Costs. The costs of acquiring land and mineral rights are considered tangible assets. Signifi-
cant acquisition payments are capitalized. General, administrative and holding costs to maintain an exploration property are
expensed as incurred. If a mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins using the
units-of-production method. If no mineable ore body is discovered or such rights are otherwise determined to have dimin-
ished value, such costs are expensed in the period in which the determination is made.
Exploration Costs. Exploration costs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs to identify new mineral resourc-
es, to evaluate potential resources, and to convert mineral resources into proven and probable reserves are considered
exploration costs.
Design, Construction, and Development Costs. Certain costs to design and construct mine and processing facili-
ties may be incurred prior to establishing proven and probable reserves. Under these circumstances, we classify the project
as an exploration stage project and expense substantially all costs, including design, engineering, construction, and instal-
lation of equipment. Certain types of equipment, which have alternative uses or significant salvage value, may be capital-
ized. If a project is determined to contain proven and probable reserves, costs incurred in anticipation of production can
be capitalized. Such costs include development drilling to further delineate the ore body, removing overburden during the
pre-production phase, building access ways, constructing facilities, and installing equipment. Interest costs, if any, incurred
during the development phase, would be capitalized until the assets are ready for their intended use. The cost of start-up
activities and on-going costs to maintain production are expensed as incurred. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to
operations upon abandonment.
If a project commences commercial production, amortization and depletion of capitalized costs is computed on a
unit-of–production basis over the expected reserves of the project based on estimated recoverable gold equivalent ounces.
Gold Resource Corporation 19
2010 Annual Report
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate our long-lived assets for impairment. If impairment indicators
exist, we perform additional analysis to quantify the amount by which capitalized costs exceed recoverable value. The
periodic evaluation of capitalized costs is based upon expected future cash flows, including estimated salvage values. As
of December 31, 2009, our mineral resources do not meet the definition of proven or probable reserves or value beyond
proven and probable reserves and any potential revenue has been excluded from the cash flow assumptions. Accordingly,
recoverability of capitalized cost is based primarily on estimated salvage values, or alternative future uses.
Asset Retirement Obligation. All items of property and equipment are carried at cost not in excess of their esti-
mated net realizable value. Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to earnings while expenditures for major mainte-
nance and betterments are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposition are recognized in operations.
Stock Based Compensation. We record compensation expense for the fair value of stock options that are granted.
Expense is recognized on a pro-rata basis over the vesting periods, if any, of the options. The fair value of stock options at
their grant date is estimated by using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.
Foreign Currency Translation. The local currency where our properties are located, the Mexican peso, is the
functional currency for our subsidiaries. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate in effect at the balance
sheet date. Intercompany equity accounts are translated using historical rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at
the average exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments are not included in the determination of net loss for the
period and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Income Taxes. Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax
effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting pur-
poses and the effect of net operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets are evaluated to determine if it is more likely
than not that they will be realized. Valuation allowances have been established to reduce the carrying value of deferred tax
assets in recognition of significant uncertainties regarding their ultimate realization. Further, the evaluation has determined
that there are no uncertain tax positions required to be disclosed.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards. We evaluate the pronouncements of various authoritative accounting orga-
nizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC, and the Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on us. We adopted the following
new accounting standards during 2009:
Accounting Standards Codification - In June, 2009, FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) as the single source of authoritative US GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative US GAAP for SEC regis-
trants. The ASC is a new structure which took existing accounting pronouncements and organized them by accounting
topic. The ASC did not change current US GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative US GAAP
by providing all the relevant literature related to a particular topic in one place. All previously existing accounting standards
were superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New ac-
counting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 will be communicated by the FASB through Accounting Standards
Updates (ASU’s). The ASC was effective during the period ended September 30, 2009. Adoption of the ASC did not have
an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Subsequent Events - In May, 2009, the ASC guidance for subsequent events was updated to establish accounting and
reporting standards for events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The guid-
ance was amended in February, 2010. The update sets forth: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which man
Gold Resource Corporation 20
2010 Annual Report
agement of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in
the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after
the balance sheet in its financial statements, and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transac-
tions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements. We adopted the updated guidance in 2009. The
adoption had no impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Updates. The following accounting standards updates were recently issued
and have not yet been adopted by us. These standards are currently under review to determine their impact on our consoli-
dated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
ASU 2010-6 amends existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements by adding required disclo-
sures about items transferring into and out of levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy; adding separate disclosures about
purchase, sales, issuances, and settlements relative to level 3 measurements; and clarifying, among other things, the exist-
ing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation. This ASU will be effective for the first quarter of 2010.
ASU 2009-17 revises the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities. The modifications include the elimi-
nation of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining who should consolidate a
variable-interest entity, and changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity.
This standard will be effective January 1, 2010.
There were various other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the account-
ing literature or application to specific industries. None of the updates are expected to a have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our exposure to market risks includes, but is not limited to, the following risks: changes in foreign currency ex-
change rates, changes in interest rates, equity price risks, commodity price fluctuations, and country risk. We do not use
derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk; however, we may consider such ar-
rangements in the future as we evaluate our business and financial strategy.
Foreign Currency Risk
We transact a significant amount of our business in Mexican pesos. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations
may impact our operating costs. The appreciation of non-US dollar currencies such as the peso against the US dollar
increases expenses and the cost of purchasing capital assets in US dollar terms in Mexico, which can adversely impact our
operating results and cash flows. Conversely, a depreciation of non-US dollar currencies usually decreases operating costs
and capital asset purchases in US dollar terms.
The value of cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies also fluctuates with changes in currency
exchange rates. Appreciation of non-US dollar currencies results in a foreign currency gain on such investments and a
decrease in non-US dollar currencies results in a loss. We have not utilized market risk sensitive instruments to manage
our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates but may in the future actively manage our exposure to foreign currency
exchange rate risk. We also hold portions of our cash reserves in non-US dollar currencies.
Interest Rate Risk
We have no debt outstanding nor do we have any investment in debt instruments other than highly liquid short-term
investments. Accordingly, we consider our interest rate risk exposure to be insignificant at this time.
Gold Resource Corporation 21
2010 Annual Report
Equity Price Risk
We have in the past sought and may in the future seek to acquire additional funding by sale of common stock and
other equity. Movements in the price of our common stock have been volatile in the past and may also be volatile in the
future. As a result, there is a risk that we may not be able to sell our common stock at an acceptable price should the need
for new equity funding arise.
Commodity Price Risk
We currently do not have any production but expect to produce gold and silver in the near future. If we commence
production and sales, changes in the price of gold and other minerals could significantly affect our results of operations and
cash flows in the future. We do not presently expect to hedge the sale of any of our anticipated production.
Country Risk
All of our mineral properties are located in Mexico. In the past, that country has been subject to political instability,
changes and uncertainties which may cause changes to existing government regulations affecting mineral exploration and
mining activities. Civil or political unrest could disrupt our operations at any time. Our exploration and mining activities may
be adversely affected in varying degrees by changing government regulations relating to the mining industry or shifts in po-
litical conditions that could increase the costs related to our activities or maintaining our properties. Finally, Mexico’s status
as a developing country may make it more difficult for us to obtain required financing for our properties.
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines internal control over financial reporting in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) as
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those
policies and procedures that:
-
-
-
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
disposition of assets;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial state
ments in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention and timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or dispo
sition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems that are
determined to be effective provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presenta-
tion. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deterio-
rate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on criteria for effective internal
control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on its assessment, management concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009.
Gold Resource Corporation 22
2010 Annual Report
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Gold Resource Corporation
Denver, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Gold Resource Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2009, and the period August 24, 1998 (inception) to December 31, 2009. We also have audited
Gold Resource Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Gold
Resource Corporation’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, including in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial state-
ments are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted ac-
counting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Gold Resource Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2009, and the period August 24, 1998 (inception) to December 31, 2009, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, Gold Resource Corpora-
tion maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria
established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Com-
mission (COSO).
March 12, 2010
Denver, Colorado
Gold Resource Corporation
23
2010 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008
ASSETS
2009
2008
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Prepaid and refundable taxes
Other current assets
Total current assets
Land and mineral rights
Property and equipment - net
Other assets
Total assets
$6,752,325
11,436,074
2,132,495
380,511
20,701,405
$3,534,578
-
-
202,890
3,737,468
226,610
1,726,278
10,465
$22,664,758
226,610
812,219
4,721
$4,781,018
Current liabilities:
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Total current liabilities
$724,439
724,439
$1,753,285
1,753,285
Asset retirement obligation
1,991,987
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock - $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized:
no shares issued and outstanding
Common stock - $0.001 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized:
48,100,284 and 36,087,556 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
48,100
95,692,273
(74,817,721)
-
Additional paid-in capital
(Deficit) accumulated during the exploration stage
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Currency translation adjustment
Total shareholders’ equity
-
-
36,088
43,686,779
(40,688,414)
(974,320)
19,948,332
(6,720)
3,027,733
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$22,664,758
$4,781,018
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Gold Resource Corporation 24
Gold Resource Corporation
15
2010 Annual Report
2007 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
and for the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to December 31, 2009
Inception
(August 24,
to December
31, 2009
2009
2008
2007
$
- $
- $
- $
-
Revenues:
Gold sales
Costs and Expenses:
Property exploration and evaluation 7,811,371
Engineering and construction 20,994,436
Management contract- U S Gold, related party
8,171,396
14,501,461
5,731,771
-
24,485,210
35,495,897
General and administrative
Depreciation
5,211,004
166,993
Total costs and expenses 34,183,804
-
-
3,552,007
123,948
26,348,812 8,318,855
752,191
-
14,416,382
2,539,604
47,480 363,708
75,513,388
Operating (loss)
(34,183,804) (26,348,812) (8,318,855) (75,513,388)
Other income:
Interest income
54,497 333,609
242,513
695,667
(Loss) before income taxes
(34,129,307) (26,015,203) (8,076,342) (74,817,721)
Provision for income taxes
-
-
-
-
Net (loss)
(34,129,307) (26,015,203) (8,076,342) (74,817,721)
Other comprehensive income:
Currency translation gain (loss)
(967,600)
63,536
(89,939)
(974,320)
Net comprehensive (loss)
$(35,096,907) $(25,951,667) $(8,166,281) $(75,792,041)
Net (loss) per common share:
Basic and Diluted
$(0.78)
$(0.76)
$(0.28)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and Diluted
43,764,703 34,393,854 28,645,038
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Gold Resource Corporation
25
2010 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to December 31, 2009
Number of
Common
Shares
Par Value
of Common
Shares
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
(Deficit)
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
Balance at Inception, August 24, 1998 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Shares for contributed capital at
$0.005 per share - related parties
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 1998
Shares for contributed capital at
$0.005 per share - related parties
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 1999
2,800,000
-
2,800,000
1,000,000
-
3,800,000
Shares issued for management contract
at $0.17 per share - related party 1,226,666
-
5,026,666
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2000
2,800
-
2,800
1,000
-
3,800
1,226
-
5,026
(1,400)
-
(1,400)
(500)
-
(1,900)
202,578
-
200,678
-
(1,657)
(1,657)
-
(663)
(2,320)
-
(205,110)
(207,430)
Shares issued for management contract
at $0.14 per share - related party 1,333,334
1,334
187,053
-
Conversion of debentures at
$0.25 per share - related parties
Sale of shares for cash at $0.25 per share
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2001
200,000
820,000
-
7,380,000
Shares issued for cash at $0.25 per share
Shares issued for cash at $0.17 per share
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2002
392,000
1,351,352
-
9,123,352
Shares issued for cash at $0.25 per share
Share issuance costs forgiven
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2003
577,000
-
-
9,700,352
200
820
-
7,380
392
1,351
-
9,123
577
-
-
9,700
49,800
204,180
-
641,711
97,608
223,322
-
962,641
-
-
(346,498)
(553,928)
-
-
(788,629)
(1,342,557)
143,673
25,327
-
1,131,641
-
-
(496,046)
(1,838,603)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(17)
(17)
-
-
29
12
-
1,400
(1,657)
(257)
500
(663)
(420)
203,804
(205,110)
(1,726)
188,387
50,000
205,000
(346,498)
95,163
98,000
224,673
(788,646)
(370,810)
144,250
25,327
(496,017)
(697,250)
152,000
-
500,000
Shares issued for cash at $0.25 per share
Shares issued in repayment of loan related
to exploration agreement at
$0.42 per share
Shares issued as stock grant at
$0.25 per share
Net (loss)
608,000
608
151,392
1,200,000
1,200
498,800
-
-
600,000
-
600
-
149,400
-
-
(853,593) (73)
-
150,000
(853,666)
Gold Resource Corporation 26
2010 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to December 31, 2009
(Continued)
Number of
Common
Shares
Par Value
of Common
Shares
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
(Deficit)
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2004
12,108,352
12,108
1,931,233
(2,692,196)
(61)
(748,916)
Stock grant at $0.25 per share
Stock option exercised at $0.25 per share
Stock issued for cash at $0.25 per share
Stock issued for satisfaction of payables
at $0.25 per share
Shares issued for cash at $0.47 per share
Shares issued for cash at $0.50 per share
Shares issued for cash at $0.50 per share
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2005
1,750,000
10,000
276,000
1,280,000
2,728,500
122,000
30,000
-
18,304,852
1,750
10
276
1,280
2,729
122
30
-
18,305
435,750
2,490
68,724
318,720
1,272,271
60,878
14,970
-
4,105,036
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,217,911)
(3,910,107)
Stock options exercised at $0.25 per share
Stock options granted
Director stock grant at $1.00 per share
Shares issued for cash at $1.00 per share,
net of issue costs
Shares issued for investor relations
services at $1.14 per share
Shares issued for cash at $1.20 per share,
240,000
-
100,000
240
-
100
59,760
147,050
99,900
4,600,000
4,600
4,346,600
280,000
280
319,720
net of issue costs
4,322,000
4,322
4,924,378
Shares issued for investment banking
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
200
139
-
-
-
-
-
-
437,500
2,500
69,000
320,000
1,275,000
61,000
15,000
(1,217,711)
213,373
60,000
147,050
100,000
4,351,200
320,000
4,928,700
services at $1.20 per share
Employee stock grants at $1.71 per share
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2006
257,700
35,000
-
28,139,552
257
35
-
28,139
(257)
59,815
-
14,062,002
-
-
(2,686,762)
(6,596,869)
-
-
19,544
19,683
-
59,850
(2,667,218)
7,512,955
Shares issued for investor relations
services at weighted average price
of $3.39 per share
Shares issued for consulting services in
Mexico at $3.68 per share
Stock options granted
Shares issued for cash at $4.00 per share,
170,000
170
575,598
15,000
-
15
-
55,185
99,482
net of issue costs
5,558,500
5,559
21,706,441
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
575,768
55,200
99,482
21,712,000
Shares issued for investment banking
services
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2007
Stock options granted
Shares issued for investor relations
services at $4.25 per share
Stock options exercised at $1.00 per share
Shares issued for cash at $3.00 per share
Net (loss)
263,900
-
34,146,952
264
-
34,147
(264)
-
36,498,444
-
(8,076,342)
(14,673,211)
-
(89,939)
(70,256)
-
(8,166,281)
21,789,124
-
-
1,956,806
-
-
1,956,806
10,000
260,604
1,670,000
-
10
261
1,670
-
42,460
180,739
5,008,330
-
-
-
-
(26,015,203)
-
-
-
42,470
181,000
5,010,000
63,536 (25,951,667)
Gold Resource Corporation
27
2010 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
For the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to December 31, 2009
(Continued)
Number of
Common
Shares
Par Value
of Common
Shares
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
(Deficit)
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
(Deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2008
36,087,556
36,088
43,686,779
(40,688,414)
(6,720)
3,027,733
Stock options granted
Stock options exercised, cashless exercise
Shares issued for cash at $3.00 per share
Shares issued for cash at $4.00 per share
Shares issued for cash at $8.185 per share
Stock options exercised at $3.68 per share
Net (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2009
-
677,933
4,330,000
5,000,000
1,954,795
50,000
-
48,100,284
-
677
4,330
5,000
1,955
50
-
$48,100
2,843,506
(677)
12,985,670
19,995,000
15,998,045
183,950
-
$95,692,273
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(34,129,307) (967,600)
$(74,817,721) $(974,320)
2,843,506
-
12,990,000
20,000,000
16,000,000
184,000
(35,096,907)
$19,948,332
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Gold Resource Corporation
28
2010 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(An Exploration Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
and for the period from Inception (August 24, 1998) to December 31, 2009
2009
Inception
(August 24, 1998) to
2008 2007 December 31, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
$(34,129,307)
Net (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash
(used in) operating activities:
166,993
Depreciation
1,991,987
Asset retirement obligation
2,843,506
Stock compensation
-
Management fee paid in stock
-
Related party payable paid in stock
Foreign currency translation adjustment (967,600)
-
Issuance cost forgiven
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
$(26,015,203) $(8,076,342) $(74,817,721)
123,948
-
1,999,276
-
-
63,536
-
47,480
-
730,450
-
-
(89,939)
-
363,708
1,991,987
6,787,632
392,191
320,000
(974,320)
25,327
(11,436,074)
Restricted cash
(2,132,495)
Prepaid and refundable taxes
Other current assets
(174,359)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (1,028,846)
Other
(9,006)
(10,745,894)
Total adjustments
- (11,436,074)
- (2,132,495)
(380,511)
317,289 724,439
-
(13,575)
1,167,452 (4,331,691)
Net cash (used in) operating activities (44,875,201) (23,005,822) (6,908,890) (79,149,412)
(162,212) 162,172
984,833
-
3,009,381
-
-
Cash flows from investing activities:
(1,204,253)
Capital expenditures
Net cash (used in) investing activities (1,204,253)
(657,816)
(657,816)
(456,152) (2,439,787)
(456,152) (2,439,787)
Cash flows from financing activities:
-
Proceeds from initial public stock offering
Proceeds from other sales of stock 48,990,000
184,000
Proceeds from exercise of options
Proceeds from debentures - founders
-
"Proceeds from exploration
- - 4,351,200
5,010,000 21,712,000 82,889,623
- 427,500
181,000
50,000
-
-
funding agreement - Canyon Resources"
-
Net cash provided by financing activities 49,174,000
500,000
5,191,000 21,712,000 88,218,323
-
-
Effect of exchange rates on cash and equivalents:
123,201
-
-
123,201
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents
3,217,747 (18,472,638) 14,346,958
6,752,325
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
3,534,578 22,007,216 7,660,258
-
Cash and equivalents at end of period
$6,752,325 $3,534,578 $22,007,216 $6,752,325
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of Canyon Resources funding into
common stock
Conversion of founders debentures into
common stock
$
$
$
$
-
-
$
$
- $
- $
- $
- $
-
-
-
-
$
$
- $
- $ 500,000
- $
- $ 50,000
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Gold Resource Corporation
29
2010 Annual Report
GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
(An Exploration Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. Gold Resource Corporation (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the
State of Colorado on August 24, 1998. The Company has been engaged in the exploration for precious and base metals,
primarily in Mexico, as an exploration stage company. It plans to develop mineral properties and ultimately become a
producer of gold, silver, and base metals. The Company has not generated any revenues from operations. The consoli-
dated financial statements included herein are expressed in United States dollars, the Company’s reporting currency. The
accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).
Basis of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned Mexican corporation subsidiaries. The significant subsidiaries are Don David Gold S.A. de C.V. and
Golden Trump Resources S.A. de C.V. The expenditures of Don David Gold and Golden Trump Resources are generally
incurred in Mexican pesos. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Reclassifications: Certain amounts previously presented for prior periods have been reclassified to conform
with the current presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net loss, total assets, or total shareholders’ equity.
Restricted Cash: Pursuant to the terms of two subscription agreements that were closed during 2009, the Com-
pany agreed to reserve cash proceeds of $12,000,000, for specific purposes. Under the first agreement, $4,000,000 was
restricted for the purpose of additional exploration at the El Aguila Project. Under the second agreement, $8,000,000 was
restricted for the purpose of constructing a decline ramp, drifts and crosscuts, and associated surface facilities to support
underground development and mining of the La Arista vein.
The restricted cash balances were placed in separate interest bearing bank accounts. Transfer of funds from the
restricted bank accounts requires the approval of Hochschild Mining Holdings Limited (“Hochschild”). The approval
process includes the presentation of documentation that demonstrates use of the funds for the intended purpose.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently
uncertain. Estimates that are critical to the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the identification and
valuation of proven and probable reserves, obligations for environmental, reclamation, and closure matters, estimates
related to asset impairments of long lived assets and investments, classification of expenditures as either an asset or an
expense, valuation of deferred tax assets, and the likelihood of loss contingencies Management bases its estimates and
judgements on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstanc-
es, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are revised periodically and the effects of revisions are
reflected in the financial statements in the period it is determined to be necessary. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consists of all cash balances and highly liquid invest-
ments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased and carried at cost, which approximates fair
value.
Proven and Probable Reserves. The definition of proven and probable reserves is set forth in SEC Industry
Guide 7. Proven reserves are reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches,
workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for
inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape,
depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established. Probable reserves are reserves for which quantity and grade
and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for inspection, sam-
pling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although low-
er than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. In addition, reserves
cannot be considered proven and probable until they are supported by a feasibility study, indicating that the reserves have
had the requisite geologic, technical and economic work performed and are economically and legally extractable at the
time of the reserve determination.
Gold Resource Corporation 30
2010 Annual Report
As of December 31, 2009, none of the Company’s mineralized material met the definition of proven or probable
reserves.
Mineral Acquisition Costs. The costs of acquiring land and mineral rights are considered tangible assets.
Significant acquisition payments are capitalized. General, administrative and holding costs to maintain an exploration
property are expensed as incurred. If a mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are amortized when production begins
using the units-of-production method. If no mineable ore body is discovered or such rights are otherwise determined to
have diminished value, such costs are expensed in the period in which the determination is made.
Exploration Costs. Exploration costs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs to identify new mineral re-
sources, to evaluate potential resources, and to convert mineral resources into proven and probable reserves are considered
exploration costs.
Design, Construction, and Development Costs. Certain costs to design and construct mine and processing
facilities may be incurred prior to establishing proven and probable reserves. Under these circumstances, the Company
classifies the project as an exploration stage project and expenses substantially all costs, including design, engineering,
construction, and installation of equipment. Certain types of equipment, which have alternative uses or significant salvage
value, may be capitalized. If a project is determined to contain proven and probable reserves, costs incurred in anticipa-
tion of production can be capitalized. Such costs include development drilling to further delineate the ore body, removing
overburden during the pre-production phase, building access ways, constructing facilities, and installing equipment. Inter-
est costs, if any, incurred during the development phase, would be capitalized until the assets are ready for their intended
use. The cost of start-up activities and on-going costs to maintain production are expensed as incurred. Costs of aban-
doned projects are charged to operations upon abandonment.
If a project commences commercial production, amortization and depletion of capitalized costs is computed on a
unit-of–production basis over the expected reserves of the project based on estimated recoverable gold equivalent ounces.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment. If impair-
ment indicators exist, the Company performs additional analysis to quantify the amount by which capitalized costs exceed
recoverable value. The periodic evaluation of capitalized costs is based upon expected future cash flows, including esti-
mated salvage values. As of December 31, 2009, the Company’s mineral resources do not meet the definition of proven
or probable reserves or value beyond proven and probable reserves and any potential revenue has been excluded from the
cash flow assumptions. Accordingly, recoverability of capitalized cost is based primarily on estimated salvage values, or
alternative future uses.
Property and Equipment. All items of property and equipment are carried at cost not in excess of their es-
timated net realizable value. Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to operations while expenditures for major
maintenance and betterments are capitalized. Gains or losses on disposition are recognized in operations.
Depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using straight-line methods over the esti-
mated economic lives, as follows:
Trucks and autos
Office furniture and equipment
Computer hardware and software
Exploration equipment
4 to 5 years
5 to 10 years
3 to 6 years
6 to 8 years
Asset Retirement Obligations. The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws
and regulations, including legal and contractual obligations to reclaim, remediate, or otherwise restore properties at the
time the property is removed from service. A liability is initially recorded at the estimated present value for an obligation
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of
fair value can be made. For exploration stage properties that do not qualify for asset capitalization, the costs associated
with the obligation are charged to operations. For development and production stage properties, the costs are added to the
capitalized costs of the property and amortized using the unit of production method.
Stock Based Compensation. The Company records compensation expense for the fair value of stock options
that are granted. Expense is recognized on a pro-rata basis over the vesting periods, if any, of the options. The fair value
of stock options at their grant date is estimated by using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.
Gold Resource Corporation 31
2010Annual Report
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if potentially dilutive securities are converted into common shares. Potentially dilutive
securities, such as stock options and warrants, are excluded from the calculation when their inclusion would be anti-dilu-
tive, such as periods when a net loss is reported or when the exercise price of the instrument exceeds the fair market value.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the calculation excluded potential dilution of 3,745,000,
3,683,000, and 2,650,000 shares, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Income Taxes. Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred income taxes reflect the net
tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax reporting
purposes and the effect of net operating loss carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets are evaluated to determine if it is more
likely than not that they will be realized. Valuation allowances have been established to reduce the carrying value of de-
ferred tax assets in recognition of significant uncertainties regarding their ultimate realization. Further, the evaluation has
determined that there are no uncertain tax positions required to be disclosed.
Comprehensive Income. Total comprehensive income and the components of accumulated other comprehen-
sive income (loss) are presented in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity. Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) is composed of foreign currency translation effects.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 825, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,”
requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments. ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC
820”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principals, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market
assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2009.
The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximate their fair values.
These financial instruments include cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, prepaid and refundable taxes, accounts payable
and accrued liabilities. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they
are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair value, or they are receivable or payable on demand.
Concentration of Credit Risk. Some of the Company’s operating cash balances are maintained in accounts
that currently exceed federally insured limits. The Company believes that the financial strength of depositing institutions
mitigate the underlying risk of loss. To date, these concentrations of credit risk have not had a significant impact on the
Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Foreign Operations. The Company’s present mining activities are in Mexico. As with all types of international
business operations, currency fluctuations, exchange controls, restrictions on foreign investment, changes to tax regimes,
political action and political instability could impair the value of the Company’s investments.
Foreign Currency Translation. The local currency where the Company’s properties are located, the Mexican
peso, is the functional currency for the Company’s subsidiaries. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange
rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Intercompany equity accounts are translated using historical rates. Revenues and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments are not included in the determi-
nation of net loss for the period and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Prepaid and Refundable Taxes. In Mexico, value added taxes (IVA) are assessed on purchases of materials
and services. Businesses are generally entitled to recover the taxes they have paid, either as a refund or as a credit against
future taxes payable. For the period from inception through 2008, substantially all of the Company’s refund claims were
initially denied by the tax authorities. Accordingly, the Company provided a full valuation allowance for potentially
refundable IVA. During 2009, the Company was successful in establishing the validity of its claims and received IVA
refunds in the amount of $1,075,266. Furthermore, it appears that the tax authorities will honor the Company’s claims
for substantially all of the IVA paid during 2009. Amounts recorded as prepaid and refundable taxes in the consolidated
financial statements represent the estimated recoverable payments made during 2009. Although the taxing authorities may
reconsider claims filed for previous years, significant uncertainties regarding ultimate recovery preclude recognition of an
asset for taxes paid in prior years.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards. The Company evaluates the pronouncements of various authoritative
Gold Resource Corporation 32
2010 Annual Report
accounting organizations, primarily the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the SEC, and the Emerging Is-
sues Task Force (“EITF”), to determine the impact of new pronouncements on US GAAP and the impact on the Company.
The Company has adopted the following new accounting standards during 2009:
Accounting Standards Codification - In June, 2009, FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) as the single source of authoritative US GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative US GAAP for SEC regis-
trants. The ASC is a new structure which took existing accounting pronouncements and organized them by accounting
topic. The ASC did not change current US GAAP, but was intended to simplify user access to all authoritative US GAAP
by providing all the relevant literature related to a particular topic in one place. All previously existing accounting stan-
dards were superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the ASC is considered non-authoritative. New
accounting standards issued subsequent to June 30, 2009 will be communicated by the FASB through Accounting Stan-
dards Updates (ASUs). The ASC was effective during the period ended September 30, 2009. Adoption of the ASC did
not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Subsequent Events - In May, 2009, the ASC guidance for subsequent events was updated to establish account-
ing and reporting standards for events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued.
The guidance was amended in February, 2010. The update sets forth: (i) the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition
or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transac-
tions occurring after the balance sheet in its financial statements, and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about
events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements. The Company adopted the updated
guidance in 2009. The adoption had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Updates. The following accounting standards updates were recently
issued and have not yet been adopted by the Company. These standards are currently under review to determine their
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
ASU 2010-6 amends existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements by adding required disclo-
sures about items transferring into and out of levels 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy; adding separate disclosures about
purchase, sales, issuances, and settlements relative to level 3 measurements; and clarifying, among other things, the exist-
ing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation. This ASU will be effective for the first quarter of 2010.
ASU 2009-17 revises the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities. The modifications include the
elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, a new approach for determining who should consoli-
date a variable-interest entity, and changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest
entity. This standard will be effective January 1, 2010.
There were various other updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the account-
ing literature or application to specific industries. None of the updates are expected to a have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. Mineral Properties
The Company currently has an interest in five properties, the El Aguila project, the El Rey property, the Las Mar-
garitas property, the Solaga property, and the Alta Gracia property.
The El Aguila Project. Effective October 14, 2002, the Company leased three mining concessions, El Aguila, El
Aire, and La Tehuana from a shareholder. The lease agreement is subject to a 4% net smelter return royalty where pro-
duction is sold in the form of gold/silver dore and 5% for production sold in concentrate form. The Company has made
periodic advance royalty payments under the lease totaling $260,000 and no further advance royalty payments are due.
Subject to minimum exploration requirements, there is no expiration term for the lease. The Company may terminate it at
any time upon written notice to the lessor and the lessor may terminate it if the Company fails to fulfill any of its obliga-
tions. The El Aguila and El Aire concessions make up the El Aguila project and the La Tehuana concession makes up the
Las Margaritas property.
The Company has filed for and received additional concessions for the El Aguila project that total an additional
Gold Resource Corporation 33
2010 Annual Report
8,492 hectares. These additional concessions are not part of the concessions leased from the shareholder, and bring the
Company’s interest in the El Aguila project to an aggregate of 9,463 hectares. The mineral concessions making up the El
Aguila project are located within the Mexican State of Oaxaca.
The 2009 drilling program continued to explore a relatively new area of mineralization at the El Aguila Project
known as the La Arista vein area, approximately two kilometers from the mill site. The mineralized material in this area
is targeted to be mined using underground methods.
The El Rey Property. The Company has acquired claims in another area in the state of Oaxaca by filing conces-
sions under the Mexican mining laws, referred to by the Company as the El Rey property. These concessions total 892
hectares and are subject to a 2% royalty on production payable to a shareholder. The Company has conducted minimal
exploration and drilling on this property to date.
The El Rey property is an exploration stage property with no known reserves. It is approximately 64 kilometers
(40 miles) from the El Aguila project. There is no plant or equipment on the El Rey property. If exploration is successful,
any mining would probably require an underground mine but any mineralized material could be processed at the El Aguila
project mill.
The Las Margaritas Property. The Las Margaritas property is made up of the La Tehuana concession. The
Company leased this property in October 2002 from a shareholder. It is comprised of approximately 925 hectares located
adjacent to the El Aguila property. To date, the Company has conducted limited surface sampling, but no other significant
exploration activities at the property.
The Solaga Property. In February 2007, the Company leased a 100% interest in a property known as the Solaga
property from an entity partially owned by a shareholder. The property totals 618 hectares, and is located approximately
120 kilometers (75 miles) from the El Aguila project. A dormant silver mine is located on the Solaga property which was
in production as recently as the 1980’s, however the Company cannot estimate if or when the mine will reopen. The lease
requires the Company to perform $25,000 in additional work and is subject to a 4% net smelter return royalty on any pro-
duction. The Company has not conducted any exploration activities at the property.
The Alta Gracia Property. In August 2009, the Company acquired claims adjacent to the Las Margaritas prop-
erty in the Alta Gracia mining district by filing concessions under the Mexican mining laws. The Company refers to this
property as the Alta Gracia property. These concessions are comprised of three mining claims, the David 1, the David
2 and La Hurradura. The concessions total 5,175 hectares, and the acquisition of these claims extended the Company’s
land position along what is known as the San Jose structural corridor to just over 16 kilometers. To date, the Company
has not conducted significant exploration activities at the property.
As of December 31, 2009, none of the mineralized material at the Company’s properties met the SEC’s definition
of proven or probable reserves.
3. Property and Equipment
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, property and equipment consisted of the following:
Trucks and autos
Office furniture and equipment
Exploration equipment
Other support equipment
Subtotal
Accumulated depreciation
Total
2008
2009
$ 291,876
$ 424,527
137,678
491,447
570,794
916,879
--
228,110
1,000,348
2,060,963
(334,685)
(188,129)
$ 1,726,278 $ 812,219
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $166,993, $123,948, and
$47,480, respectively. The Company evaluates the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circum-
stances indicate that such assets might be impaired.
4. Income Taxes
Income (Loss) before income taxes, segregated as to the U. S. and foreign components, is as follows:
Gold Resource Corporation 34
2010 Annual Report
U. S.
Foreign
Total
2009
$ (2,947,251)
(31,182,056)
$ (34,129,307)
2008
$ (12,697,644)
(13,317,559)
$ (26,015,203)
2007
$ (3,002,018)
(5,074,324)
$ (8,076,342)
At December 31, 2009, the Company has tax loss carry-forwards for U. S. tax purposes approximating
$6,260,000, which primarily expire from 2026 to 2029. The principal difference between the net loss reported for financial
reporting purposes and the taxable loss reported for tax purposes relates to the taxation of foreign subsidiaries. Secondly,
stock based compensation expenses are generally deductible in different periods and in different amounts than the expense
recognized for financial reporting purposes. Finally, certain expenditures for property and equipment are capitalized for
tax purposes, but not for financial reporting purposes.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets at Decem-
ber 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:
Deferred tax assets:
2009
2008
$ 2,129,000
Tax loss carryforward – U. S.
Tax loss carryforward – Foreign 19,321,000
350,000
Stock based compensation
3,700,000
Property and equipment
25,500,000
(25,500,000)
$ --
Valuation allowance
Total deferred tax assets
Net deferred tax asset
$ 2,996,000
7,877,000
814,000
2,188,000
13,875,000
(13,875,000)
$ --
At this time, the Company is unable to determine if it will be able to benefit from its deferred tax asset. There
are limitations on the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards, including a requirement that losses be offset against
future taxable income, if any. In addition, there are limitations imposed by certain transactions which are deemed to be
ownership changes. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established for the entire deferred tax asset. The change
in the valuation allowance was approximately $11,625,000 during 2009.
A reconciliation of taxes reported at the Company’s effective tax rate and the U. S. federal statutory tax rate is
comprised of the following components:
Tax at statutory rates
Increase (reduction) in taxes
due to:
2009
$ ( 11,604,000)
2008
$ (8,845,000)
2007
$ (2,746,000)
Stock based compensation --
11,604,000
Valuation allowance
$ --
Tax provision
--
8,845,000
$ --
34,000
2,712,000
$ --
5. Shareholders’ Equity
Effective February 21, 2005, the Company declared and effected a 100% forward stock split where one addi-
tional share of common stock, par value $0.001, was issued for each common share outstanding as of that date. All of the
financial information in this report has been adjusted to reflect the effect of this two-for-one stock split and the increase in
authorized shares.
The Company was formed August 24, 1998 by William W. Reid and David C. Reid (the “Founders”). During
1998 and 1999, the Founders received 3,800,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,900 for administrative and organi-
zation expenses. The Company remained generally inactive through 1999.
Commencing July 1, 2000, the Company and US Gold, a publicly traded Colorado corporation, entered into a
management contract whereby US Gold provided general management of the business activities of the Company through
December 31, 2001. Under this management contract, US Gold was issued 2,560,000 shares of common stock of the
Company. The 2,560,000 shares were valued at $392,191 or approximately $0.15 per share. Through this arrangement
the Company benefited from experienced management without the need to raise cash funding for the related cost of such
Gold Resource Corporation 35
2010 Annual Report
management and administration. The Company was, however, responsible for all additional funding needed.
During 2001, the Founders made convertible debenture loans to the Company and then converted $50,000 in con-
vertible debentures into 200,000 shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $0.25 per share.
In September 2001, the Company commenced the sale of its common shares under exemptions offered by federal
and state securities regulations. During 2001 the Company sold 820,000 shares at $0.25 per share (total $205,000).
During 2002, the Company sold 392,000 shares at $0.25 per share ($98,000) to various parties and 1,351,352
shares at approximately $0.17 per share ($224,673) to an institutional investor, RMB International (Dublin) Limited
(“RMB”).
During 2003, the Company sold 577,000 shares at $0.25 per share raising net proceeds of $144,250. Effective
September 30, 2003, U.S. Gold acquired the RMB shares in exchange for U.S. Gold shares, and terminated the obligation
of the Company to pay RMB approximately $25,327 in transaction costs, which was added back into paid-in-capital.
During 2004, the Company sold 608,000 shares at $0.25 per share raising net proceeds of $152,000. Also during
2004, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares valued at approximately $0.42 per share to Canyon Resource Corporation
for repayment of a loan for funding of exploration cost at the El Aguila property. Also during 2004, the Company made a
stock grant of 600,000 shares at $0.25 per share or $150,000 to a consultant of the Company.
Effective January 2, 2005, the Company made common stock awards to its two executive officers and a consultant
of an aggregate 1,750,000 shares for services performed during 2004 and 2005. The shares were valued at $437,500 (or
$0.25 per share) which was recorded as stock based compensation expense of $350,000 in 2004 and $87,500 in 2005. In
this issuance of common stock, William W. Reid received 1,000,000 shares, David C. Reid received 500,000 shares and
William F. Pass received 250,000 shares. Also effective January 2, 2005, a stock option issued to William F. Pass cover-
ing 400,000 shares of common stock at exercise price of $0.25 per share was reduced by 250,000 shares leaving 150,000
shares remaining subject to option.
During 2005 an individual exercised stock options for 10,000 shares for $2,500. In June 2005, the Company is-
sued 1,280,000 shares to U.S. Gold Corporation in satisfaction of $320,000 owed for a prior year management contract.
During 2005, the Company sold 428,000 shares to individual investors for cash proceeds of $145,000 (276,000
shares at $0.25 per share and 152,000 shares at $0.50 per share).
In addition, during July and August 2005, the Company closed transactions under a Subscription Agreement and
Stock Purchase Option Agreement with Heemskirk Consolidated Limited (“Heemskirk”), an Australian global mining
house, whereby Heemskirk purchased 2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at $0.50 per share. A finder’s
fee of 140,000 shares was paid to a third party (resulting in a net value of $0.47 per share). Heemskirk had previously
purchased (in April, 2005) 150,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share and the Company had paid a finder’s fee of
10,500 shares. The Company agreed to give Heemskirk a first right of offer for any financings, including sale of equity,
the Company may pursue. In a similar transaction during August 2005, the Company sold 400,000 shares to another
investor raising $200,000 and paid a finder’s fee to a third party of 28,000 shares. These transactions resulted in the issu-
ance of 2,728,500 shares for net cash proceeds of $1,275,000 ($0.47 per share).
During 2006, the Company sold 4,600,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share in a public offering under a
Form SB-2 registration statement that was declared effective on May 15, 2006. The Company received cash proceeds of
$4,351,200 (net of finders’ fees of $248,800).
During 2006, the Company completed a private placement of 4,322,000 shares of common stock at $1.20 per
share, and received net cash proceeds of $4,928,700, after deducting finders’ fees of $257,700. The Company also issued
257,700 shares of common stock as finders’ fees in connection with this private placement.
During 2006, the Company received cash proceeds of $60,000 pursuant to the exercise of options to purchase
240,000 shares at $0.25 per share.
In May, 2006, the Company made a common stock award of 100,000 shares to a director. These shares were
valued at $100,000. In December, 2006, the Company made a common stock award of 35,000 shares to two employees.
These shares were valued at $59,850. In October, 2006, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock
Gold Resource Corporation 36
2010 Annual Report
in exchange for investor relations services. These shares were valued at $275,000.
Pursuant to a contract effective November 1, 2006, the Company agreed to issue shares of common stock to a
consultant performing investor relations work on its behalf. The 30,000 shares issued in 2006 were valued at $1.50 per
share, or $45,000. The 30,000 shares issued in February 2007 were valued at $2.428 per share, or $72,840. The 30,000
shares issued in May 2007 were valued at $3.39 per share or $101,670. In November, 2007, 30,000 shares were issued
at a value of $4.14 per share or $124,310, and 20,000 shares were issued at a value of $4.235 per share or $84,703. The
Company agreed to issue an additional 10,000 shares for services performed during December 2007 valued at $4.375 per
share or $43,745.
On May 1, 2007, the Company entered into an investor relations contract for international investors that required
the issuance of 50,000 shares of restricted common stock during the second quarter of 2007. These shares were valued at
fair market value of $148,500.
On October 2, 2007, the Company agreed to issue 15,000 shares of common stock for consulting services per-
formed in Mexico. These shares were valued at $3.68 per share or $55,200 and were recorded as stock compensation
during the year ended December 31, 2007.
On December 5, 2007, the Company completed the sale of 5,558,500 shares of common stock in a private place-
ment for a price of $4.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $22,234,000. The sales were made pursuant to a sub-
scription agreement between the Company and each subscriber. In connection with the private placement, the Company
agreed to pay finders’ fees of $522,000 cash and 263,900 shares of common stock.
Effective January 13, 2008, the Company agreed to issue 10,000 restricted shares of common stock for investor
relations consulting services. The 10,000 shares were valued at $4.247 per share or $42,470.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, a Director of the Company exercised options to purchase 100,000
shares of the Company’s common stock at the exercise price of $1.00 per share for total cash proceeds of $100,000.
Effective July 28, 2008, an officer exercised options to purchase 87,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per
share. The officer elected the “cashless exercise” method for payment, under which he immediately surrendered 19,333
shares of common stock that he would have otherwise been entitled to receive. These shares were valued at $4.50 per
share, for a total valuation of $87,000. The transaction resulted in a net increase of 67,667 common shares outstanding.
Effective October 12, 2008, a consultant exercised options to purchase 81,000 shares of restricted common stock
at $1.00 per share for cash proceeds of $81,000. In addition, the consultant exercised options to purchase 19,000 shares
using the “cashless exercise” method of payment, under which he immediately surrendered 7,063 shares of common stock
that he would have otherwise been entitled to receive. The 7,063 shares were valued at $2.69 per share, for a total valua-
tion of $19,000 and resulting in a net issuance of 11,937 shares. As a result of both transactions, common shares outstand-
ing increased by 92,937 shares.
On December 5, 2008, the Company entered into a subscription agreement and a strategic alliance agreement with
Hochschild Mining Holdings Limited (Hochschild). Under the terms of the subscription agreement, the Company sold
1,670,000 restricted shares of its common stock to Hochschild at $3.00 per share for total cash proceeds of $5,010,000.
Under the terms of the strategic alliance agreement the Company granted Hochschild an option to purchase an additional
4,330,000 shares of its restricted common stock at a price of $3.00 per share for total cash proceeds of $12,990,000. The
option was exercised on February 25, 2009. The strategic alliance agreement also contains a number of additional cov-
enants between the parties.
On June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with Hochschild to sell 5,000,000 shares of
its restricted common stock at a price of $4.00 per share, or a total of $20,000,000. The transaction was completed in two
tranches. Simultaneously with the execution of the subscription agreement, the Company sold 1,250,000 shares of com-
mon stock for gross proceeds of $5,000,000. The closing for the remaining 3,750,000 shares of common stock was held
on July 20, 2009. The Company agreed to reserve $4,000,000 of the gross proceeds for exploration activities.
Effective October 2, 2009, a consultant exercised options to purchase 50,000 shares of restricted common stock at $3.68
per share for total cash proceeds of $184,000.
Gold Resource Corporation 37
2010 Annual Report
On December 17, 2009, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with Hochschild to sell 1,954,795
shares of restricted common stock at $8.185 per share for gross proceeds of $16,000,000. A portion of the proceeds
will be used to continue the development of the mill and mine at the El Aquila project. The Company agreed to reserve
$8,000,000 of the proceeds for underground mining expenses at the La Arista Vein.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 677,933 shares of common stock pursuant to the
exercise of stock options by officers and directors. Two option-holders exercised 913,000 options using the “cashless ex-
ercise” method for payment, whereby each option-holder immediately surrendered shares of common stock that he would
have otherwise been entitled to receive. In the aggregate, the option-holders exercised 913,000 options and immediately
surrendered 235,067 shares of common stock, resulting in a net issuance of 677,933 shares of common stock. The Com-
pany received no cash proceeds in the transactions.
6. Stock Options
The Company has a non-qualified stock option and stock grant plan under which equity awards may be granted to
key employees, directors and others (the “Plan”). The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors which determines
the terms pursuant to which any option is granted. The maximum number of common shares subject to grant under the
Plan is 6,000,000.
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pric-
ing model. The option pricing model requires the input of subjective assumptions which are based on several different
criteria. Expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of the Company’s common stock. Expected dividend
yield is assumed to be nil, as the Company has not paid dividends since inception. Based on historical experience, forfei-
tures and cancellations are not significant. The expected life is estimated in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 107, “Share-Based Payment” for plain vanilla options. Risk free interest rates are based on US government obliga-
tions with a term approximating the expected life of the option.
The fair value of stock option grants is amortized over the respective vesting period. Total non-cash compensation
expense related to stock options included in general and administrative expense for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 was $ 2,843,506, $1,956,806, and $99,482 respectively. The estimated unrecognized compensation cost
from unvested options as of December 31, 2009 was approximately $614,588, which is expected to be recognized over the
remaining vesting period of 2.4 years.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company granted stock options to a public relations consultant
to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.68 per share and a term of two years. The options
vested upon issuance. The grant date fair value was calculated as $83,192 ($1.66 per option) using the following as-
sumptions: expected life of two years, stock price of $3.68 at date of grant, dividend yield of 0%, interest rate of 4%, and
volatility of 80%.
Effective February 22, 2008, grants covering 1,000,000 shares were issued to officers and directors at an exer-
cise price of $3.40 and a term of ten years. The options vested upon issuance. The grant date fair value was calculated as
$1,803,400 ($1.80 per option) using the following assumptions: expected life of five years, stock price of $3.40 at date of
grant, dividend yield of 0%, interest rate of 2.1%, and volatility of 61%.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company granted options to employees covering 270,000 shares
of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $3.74 to $4.51 and terms of ten years. The options vest over a three year
period. The grant date fair value was calculated as $637,434 ($2.36 per option) using the following assumptions: expect-
ed life of six years, stock price equal to exercise price at date of grant, dividend yield of 0%, interest rate of 3.38%, and
volatility of 61%.
Effective January 9, 2008, the Company entered into an investor relations consulting services contract which
included the issuance of options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.45 and a term of
eighteen months. The options vested upon issuance. The grant date fair value was calculated as $67,280 ($1.35 per op-
tion) using the following assumptions: expected life of eighteen months, stock price of $4.45 at date of grant, dividend
yield of 0%, interest rate of 2.1%, and volatility of 61%.
Gold Resource Corporation
38
2010 Annual Report
Effective April 23, 2009, grants covering 1,000,000 shares were issued to officers and directors at an exercise
price of $3.95 and a term of ten years. The options vested upon issuance. The grant date fair value was calculated as
$2,575,000 ($2.575 per option) using the following assumptions: expected life of five years, stock price of $3.95 at date
of grant, dividend yield of 0%, interest rate of 1.9%, and volatility of 81%.
Effective September 23, 2009, grants covering 75,000 shares of common stock were issued to an employee at an
exercise price of $7.00 and a term of ten years. The options vest over a three year period. The grant date fair value was
calculated as $331,787 ($4.423 per option) using the following assumptions: expected life of five years, stock price of
$7.00 at date of grant, dividend yield of 0%, interest rate of 1.5%, and volatility of 78%.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted was $2.70 per option during 2009 and $1.90 per
option during 2008. The weighted average grant date fair value of options vested was $2.56 per option during 2009 and
$1.78 per option during 2008.
The following table summarizes annual activity for all stock options for each of the three years ended December 31, 2009:
Number of Shares
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
2,600,000
Outstanding, January 1, 2007
50,000
Granted
2,650,000
Outstanding, December 31, 2007
1,320,000
Granted
(287,000)
Exercised
3,683,000
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
1,075,000
Granted
(963,000)
Exercised
Expired
(50,000)
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 3,745,000
$0.60
$3.68
$0.65
$3.54
$1.00
$1.66
$4.16
$1.14
$4.45
$2.48
$ 3,130,000
--
$10,058,500
--
$ 717,500
$ 6,932,500
--
$ 2,901,456
--
$32,850,250
Number of
Exercisable
Shares
2,550,000
--
2,650,000
--
--
3,413,000
--
--
--
3,500,000
The following table summarizes information about outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2009:
Exercise
Prices
Number
of Shares
$0.25
$3.40
$3.74 -$4.51
$3.95
$7.00
1,400,000
1,000,000
270,000
1,000,000
75,000
3,745,000
Options
Outstanding
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in years)
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Number
Exercisable
Options
Exercisable
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
4.0
8.2
8.6
9.3
9.7
$0.25
$3.40
$3.91
$3.95
$7.00
$2.48
1,400,000
1,000,000
100,000
1,000,000
--
3,500,000
$0.25
$3.40
$3.91
$3.95
$2.20
$15,400,000
$7,850,000
$727,900
$7,300,000
--
$31,277,900
7. Asset Retirement Obligations
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company incurred an obligation for its El Aguila project which
includes estimated reclamation, remediation and closure costs based on local government requirements. The estimated
present value of the obligation is $1,991,987, all of which was charged to operations. There were no other liability addi-
tions, liability settlements, revision in estimated cash flows or accretion expense for the current period.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases office space in Denver, Colorado under an agreement that expires in April 2010. Required
Gold Resource Corporation 39
2010 Annual Report
payments approximate $2,500 per month. Remaining minimum lease obligations for future calendar years will be
$10,000 in 2010. Rent expense for 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $34,800, $29,900 and $27,000, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company entered into amended employment agreements with William W. Reid,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and David C. Reid, Vice President. The employment agreements have a three year
term and increase William Reid’s base salary to $300,000 annually and increase David Reid’s base salary to $212,000
annually. In addition, the period for severance payments under certain circumstances was increased to 35 months. The
Company also executed a formal written employment agreement with Jason D. Reid, who will serve as Vice President
of Corporate Development for a three year term at an annual base salary of $150,000. The employment agreements all
provide that the officers are each eligible to receive incentive compensation such as stock options or bonuses solely in the
discretion of the Board of Directors. Each officer is entitled to certain payments in the event his employment is terminat-
ed under certain circumstances. If the Company terminates the agreement “without cause,” or the officer terminates the
agreement “with good reason,” the Company would be obligated to pay 35 months of compensation in accordance with
its regular pay periods. Termination of the employment contract by an officer “with good reason” includes a change in
control.
9. Related Party Transactions
The Company has certain contractual agreements with Jose Perez Reynoso, a shareholder of the Company.
Mr. Reynoso served as the general manager of the Company’s Mexico operations on a consulting basis and was paid
$162,500, $140,000, and $113,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. In addition,
the Company leased three mining concessions from Mr. Reynoso, El Aguila, El Aire, and La Tehuana. The lease required
advance royalty payments of $260,000, all of which have been paid, and will require a 4% net smelter return royalty when
production is sold in the form of gold/silver doré and 5% for production sold in concentrate form. Mr. Reynoso is also a
part owner in an entity from which the Company leased its interest in the Solaga property.
10. Subsequent Events
On March 8, 2010 the Company completed a sale of stock pursuant to a subscription agreement with Hochschild
for 600,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock at $8.62 per share for total cash proceeds of $5,172,000.
Gold Resource Corporation 40
2010 Annual Report
STO CK PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE
GRAPH
$700.00
$600.00
$500.00
$400.00
$300.00
$200.00
$100.00
$0.00
2006
2007
2008
2009
Fiscal Year Ending December 31
Gold Resource
Corporation**
NYSE Arca Gold Bugs
NYSE Amex
Composite Index
Gold Resource Corporation**
NYSE Arca Gold Bugs
NYSE Amex Composite Index
Total Cumulative Return*
2008
$194.44
$89.41
$67.96
2007
$247.22
$121.03
$117.17
2006
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
2009
$625.00
$127.10
$88.74
* Assumes $100 invested on 12/31/06 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends
** Completed IPO in August 2006
Share information as of September
15, 2010:
2010 Special Cash Dividends Per Share:
July 29 August 30
$0.03
$0.03
Closing price per share: $18.38
Exchange: NYSE Amex: GORO
Shares Outstanding: 49,523,303
Shareholders of Record: ~75
Market Price of Common Stock
(Quoted on OTC Bulletin Board)
2010
Low Bid
High Bid
2009
Low Bid
High Bid
2008
Low Bid
High Bid
1st Qtr
$9.50
$11.52
1st Qtr
$3.15
$5.75
1st Qtr
$3.27
$4.70
2nd Qtr.
$9.50
$12.99
2nd Qtr.
$3.85
$5.45
2nd Qtr.
$4.28
$6.09
3rd Qrt.
4th Qtr.
3rd Qrt.
$4.13
$7.47
3rd Qrt.
$2.36
$5.65
4th Qtr.
$7.00
$11.15
4th Qtr.
$2.00
$3.88
Gold Resource Corporation 41
2010 Annual Report
C ORP ORATE INFORMATION
Directors & Management
William (Bill) W. Reid
CEO and Director
Jason Reid
President
David Reid
Vice President of Exploration and Director
Frank (Monty) L. Jennings
Chief Financial Officer
Financial Consultant
Bill M. Conrad
Independent Director
CFO/Director of MCM Capital
Isac Burstein
Independent Director
Corporate Manager of Business Development
for Hochschild Mining plc
Tor Falck
Independent Director
Director of Blackstone Ventures Inc.
U.S. Office
2886 Carriage Manor Point
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
303-320-7708 (Office)
303-320-7835 (Fax)
Mexico Office
Macedonio Alcala, N201-105
Col. Centro, c.p. 6800
Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico
011-52-951-516-8258
Transfer Agent
Corporate Stock Transfer
Denver, CO
303-282-4800
Auditors
StarkSchenkein, LLP
Denver, CO
303-694-6700
Legal Counsel
Dufford & Brown, P.C.
Denver, CO
303-861-8013
The Company will provide at no charge a copy of our report on Form 10-K upon request.
Please direct such request in writing to Greg Patterson at 2886 Carriage Manor Point
Colorado Springs, CO 80906.
Gold Resource Corporation 42
2010 Annual Report
Blank Page
Blank Page
Engineered
To Maximize
Shareholder
Value
Gold Resource Corporation
2010 Annual Report
U.S. Office
2886 Carriage Manor Point
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
303-320-7708 (Office)
303-320-7835 (Fax)
Mexico Office
Macedonio Alcala, N 201-105
Col. Centro, c.p. 6800
Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico
011-52-951-516-8258