GoPro
Annual Report 2017

Plain-text annual report

GoPro, Inc. Fiscal Year 2017 Proxy Statement and Annual Report To Our Shareholders: In 2017, we focused on simplifying the GoPro experience for our consumers and improving execution in an effort to deliver long- term growth and profitability. We successfully launched our most impressive flagship camera ever, HERO6 Black, and married it to a seamless GoPro app experience for easier sharing. We launched Fusion, our 360-degree camera, and quickly established GoPro as a leader in this important new capture category. And we made significant advancements to our mobile app, computer vision and machine-learning capabilities as illustrated by QuikStories, our ever-improving automated editing feature. We achieved these milestones with a leaner, more efficient organization and significantly reduced operating expenses. However, after three quarters of marked executional improvement and the successful launch of these new products, we had a challenging fourth quarter where we learned valuable lessons regarding the pricing of our products and the importance of better understanding our consumers globally. Our 2018 plan combines our 2017 learnings with GoPro’s brand and product strength to provide us the opportunity to restore growth and profitability to our business. To achieve this, we have established a clear set of priorities: • Strengthen our analytics and understanding of our consumers to enable better business planning. We’ve committed greater resources to better understand our data to improve forecasting and our understanding of our consumers. • Increase our investment in marketing to grow our brand and attract new consumers globally. GoPro’s biggest growth periods were realized with attractively priced products and significant levels of marketing. We are returning to this proven approach while targeting reduced operating expenses. • Launch products that broaden GoPro’s appeal at all price points, with greater emphasis on new consumers. HERO, the first of several new cameras we plan to release this year, launched in March with a touch display and a US$199 price point designed to attract new consumers. • Eliminate friction in our camera, mobile and cloud experience. Now that we’ve successfully deployed GoPro as a camera-to- smartphone-to-cloud experience, we’re focused on making it as seamless and intuitive as possible. • Expand the value proposition of our subscription offerings. We believe value drives adoption. In January 2018, we expanded our Plus subscription service in the U.S. market to include a “You Break It, We Replace It” damage replacement benefit, mobile content backup and unlimited photo storage. • Attract, engage and retain top talent. We’re committed to fostering an inspiring, innovation-focused culture while creating career advancement opportunities for our employees. GoPro’s brand is strong globally and consumer social engagement has never been better. We’ve learned from previous pricing challenges and have proven there is significant demand for our products at the right price. We’re seeing increased consumer usage rates with HERO6 Black and our improved GoPro app experience. Our 2018 and 2019 product pipeline is impressive even with our leaner organization and lower operating expenses. GoPro is now operating as a more efficient company, and we have clear priorities that we believe can restore growth and profitability. As founder and CEO, I want to thank our shareholders for their continued support and for being a part of our mission. Our products and services make it easy for people around the world to capture and share their lives in a way that promotes happiness and positivity. For this, we’re incredibly grateful and motivated. Nicholas Woodman Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer April 25, 2018 Dear Stockholders: You are cordially invited to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GoPro, Inc., which will be held virtually on Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time). The virtual Annual Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPRO2018, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. We believe that a virtual stockholder meeting provides greater access to those who may want to attend and therefore have chosen this over an in-person meeting. The matters expected to be acted upon at the virtual Annual Meeting are described in detail in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please cast your vote as soon as possible by Internet or telephone, or by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage-prepaid envelope to ensure that your shares will be represented. Your vote by written proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting regardless of whether you attend the virtual meeting or not. Returning the proxy does not deprive you of your right to attend the meeting and to vote your shares at the virtual meeting. We look forward to your attendance at our virtual Annual Meeting. Sincerely, Nicholas Woodman Chief Executive Officer IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 5, 2018 AT 10:00 A.M. (PACIFIC TIME): THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT www.proxyvote.com GOPRO, INC. 3000 Clearview Way San Mateo, California 94402 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Our Stockholders: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GoPro, Inc. will be held virtually on Tuesday, June 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time). The virtual Annual Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPRO2018, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. We are holding the meeting for the following purposes, which are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement: 1. To elect seven directors, all of whom are currently serving on our board of directors, each to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation, or removal. Nicholas Woodman Kenneth Goldman Peter Gotcher Alexander Lurie Susan Lyne Frederic Welts Lauren Zalaznick 2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018. 3. To amend our 2014 Equity Incentive Plan to revise the limit on non-employee director awards in any calendar year. In addition, stockholders may be asked to consider and vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 12, 2018 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the virtual meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. For ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the virtual meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary business hours at our headquarters. Your vote as a GoPro, Inc. stockholder is very important. Each share of GoPro Class A common stock that you own represents one vote and each share of GoPro Class B common stock that you own represents ten votes. For questions regarding your stock ownership, contact your brokerage firm or other entity that holds your shares or, if you are a registered holder, our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, by calling (800) 937-5449, by writing to 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219 or by visiting their website at https://www.astfinancial.com. By Order of the Board of Directors, Nicholas Woodman Chief Executive Officer San Mateo, California April 25, 2018 YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO VOTE AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL. FOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS ON VOTING BY TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET, PLEASE REFER TO YOUR PROXY CARD. TO VOTE AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY MAIL, PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. IF YOU ATTEND THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AND VOTE VIA THE VIRTUAL MEETING WEBSITE. IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH AN ACCOUNT WITH A BROKERAGE FIRM, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE, PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS YOU RECEIVE FROM YOUR ACCOUNT MANAGER TO VOTE YOUR SHARES. GOPRO, INC. PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS Table of Contents INFORMATION ABOUT SOLICITATION AND VOTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOMINATIONS PROCESS AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 1 1 4 9 PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 3 APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE LIMIT ON AWARDS THAT MAY BE MADE TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXECUTIVE OFFICERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OTHER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 22 24 25 53 54 55 57 58 59 APPENDIX A: GOPRO, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AND FRENCH SUBPLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- 1 APPENDIX B: RECONCILIATION OF GAAP TO NON-GAAP CORPORATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES . B- 1 GOPRO, INC. 3000 Clearview Way San Mateo, California 94402 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS April 25, 2018 INFORMATION ABOUT SOLICITATION AND VOTING The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors of GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro”) for use at GoPro’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held virtually on June 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) (“Annual Meeting”), and any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPRO2018, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions and vote online. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and this proxy statement for the Annual Meeting (“Proxy Statement”) and the accompanying form of proxy were first distributed and made available on the Internet to stockholders on or about April 25, 2018. GoPro’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed on February 16, 2018 (“Annual Report”) will be available with this Proxy Statement by following the instructions in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS In accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, we are using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to stockholders. Consequently, most stockholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. We will instead send these stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials with instructions for accessing the proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement and Annual Report, and voting via the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also provides information on how stockholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materials if they so choose. We believe this rule makes the proxy distribution process more efficient and less costly, and helps in conserving natural resources. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING Purpose of the Annual Meeting At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will act upon the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. Record Date; Quorum Only holders of record of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock at the close of business on April 12, 2018 (“Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the Record Date, we had 111,880,429 shares of Class A common stock and 35,962,034 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. The holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock (voting together as a single class) entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as of the Record Date must be present at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This presence is called a quorum. Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you are present and vote online at the Annual Meeting or if you have properly submitted a proxy. 1 Voting Rights; Required Vote In deciding all matters at the Annual Meeting, each holder of shares of our common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Class A common stock held and ten votes for each share of Class B common stock held as of the close of business on the Record Date. We do not have cumulative voting rights for the election of directors. You may vote all shares owned by you as of the Record Date, including (i) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record, and (ii) shares held for you as the beneficial owner in street name through a broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee. Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If, on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, then you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a stockholder of record, you may vote at the Annual Meeting or vote by telephone, by Internet, or by filling out and returning the proxy card. Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Nominee. If, on the Record Date, your shares were held in an account with a brokerage firm, bank or other nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of the shares held in street name. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account, and your nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing it on how to vote your shares. However, the organization that holds your shares is the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. Because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from the organization that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. • Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors. Each director will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast, which means that the seven individuals nominated for election to the board of directors at the Annual Meeting receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes will be elected. You may either vote “FOR” one or any of the nominees or “WITHHOLD” your vote with respect to one or any of the nominees. • Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Accounting Firm. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 will be obtained if the number of votes cast “FOR” the proposal at the Annual Meeting exceeds the number of votes “AGAINST” the proposal. • Proposal No. 3 – Approval of the Amendment to the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan to Change the Limit on Awards That May Be Made to Non-Employee Directors. Approval of the amendment to the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) to change the limit on awards that may be made to non-employee directors will be obtained if the number of votes cast “FOR” the proposal at the Annual Meeting exceeds the number of votes “AGAINST” the proposal. Broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are not voted either because (i) the broker did not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner or (ii) the broker lacked discretionary authority to vote the shares. Abstentions occur when shares present at the Annual Meeting are marked “abstain.” A broker is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on “routine” matters, such as the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018, without instructions from the beneficial owner of those shares. On the other hand, absent instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, a broker is not entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on “non-routine” matters. All of the other proposals presented at the Annual Meeting are non-routine matters. Broker non- votes and abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, but have no effect on the outcome of the matters voted upon except where brokers can exercise discretion on “routine” matters. Accordingly, we encourage you to provide voting instructions to your broker, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. 2 Recommendations of the Board of Directors on Each of the Proposals Scheduled to be Voted on at the Annual Meeting The board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the directors named in this Proxy Statement (“Proposal 1”), “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018 (“Proposal 2”) and “FOR” the approval of the amendment to the 2014 Plan to change the limit on awards that may be made to non-employee directors (“Proposal 3”). None of the directors or executive officers has any substantial interest in any matter to be acted upon, other than elections to office with respect to the directors so nominated and the approval of the amendment to the 2014 Plan. Voting Instructions; Voting of Proxies If you are a stockholder of record, you may: • • • the Annual Meeting website—any stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting by visiting vote via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GPRO2018, where stockholders may vote and submit questions during the meeting. The Annual Meeting starts at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) on June 5, 2018. Please have your 16-Digit Control Number to join the Annual Meeting. Instructions on how to attend and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted at www.proxyvote.com; vote via telephone or Internet—in order to do so, please follow the instructions shown on your proxy card; or vote by mail—complete, sign and date the proxy card enclosed herewith and return it before the Annual Meeting in the envelope provided. Votes submitted by telephone or Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on June 4, 2018. Submitting your proxy, whether via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting. If you are not the stockholder of record, please refer to the voting instructions provided by your nominee to direct your nominee on how to vote your shares. You may either vote “FOR” all of the nominees to the board of directors, or you may “WITHHOLD” your vote from all nominees or any nominee you specify. For Proposals 2 and 3, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” from voting. Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure that your vote is counted. All proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions specified on the proxy card. If you sign a physical proxy card and return it without instructions as to how your shares should be voted on a particular proposal at the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors stated above. If you do not vote and you hold your shares in street name, and your broker does not have discretionary power to vote your shares, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes” (as described above) and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval of the proposals. However, shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of establishing a quorum for the Annual Meeting. If you receive more than one proxy card, this is because your shares are registered in more than one name or are registered in different accounts. To make certain all of your shares are voted, please follow the instructions included on each proxy card and vote each proxy card by telephone or the Internet. If voting by mail, please complete, sign and return each proxy card to ensure that all of your shares are voted. Expenses of Soliciting Proxies GoPro will pay the expenses of soliciting proxies. Following the original mailing of the soliciting materials, GoPro and its agents, including directors, officers and other employees, without additional compensation, may solicit proxies by mail, electronic mail, telephone, facsimile, by other similar means, or in person. Following the original mailing of the soliciting 3 materials, GoPro will request brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward copies of the soliciting materials to persons for whom they hold shares and to request authority for the exercise of proxies. In such cases, GoPro, upon the request of the record holders, will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses. If you choose to access the proxy materials through the Internet, you are responsible for any Internet access charges you may incur. Revocability of Proxies A stockholder who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised at the Annual Meeting by: • • • • delivering to the Corporate Secretary of GoPro (by any means) a written notice stating that the proxy is revoked; signing and delivering a proxy bearing a later date; voting again by telephone or Internet; or attending and voting at the Annual Meeting (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy). Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to revoke a proxy, you must contact that firm to revoke any prior voting instructions. Voting Results Voting results will be tabulated and certified by the inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting. The preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The final results will be tallied by the inspector of elections and filed with the SEC in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days of the Annual Meeting. BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STANDARDS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE GoPro is strongly committed to good corporate governance practices. These practices provide an important framework within which our board of directors and management can pursue our strategic objectives for the benefit of our stockholders. Our board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that set forth the role of our board of directors, director independence standards, board structure and functions, director selection considerations, and other governance policies. In addition, our board of directors has adopted written charters for its standing committees (audit, compensation and leadership, and nominating and governance), as well as a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. Our board of directors reviews each of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the committee charters, and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics annually and implements changes as appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, the committee charters, and the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and any waivers or amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, are all available on our Investor Relations website (http://investor.gopro.com) in the “Corporate Governance” section. Board Leadership Structure Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our board of directors may choose its chairperson in any way that it considers to be in the best interests of our company. Our nominating and governance committee periodically considers the leadership structure of our board of directors, including the separation of the chairperson and chief executive officer roles and/or appointment of a lead independent director of our board of directors, and makes such recommendations to our board of directors as our nominating and governance committee deems appropriate. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that, when the positions of chairperson and chief executive officer are held by the same person, the independent directors may designate a “lead independent director.” In cases in which the chairperson and chief executive officer are the same person, the responsibilities of the lead independent director include: scheduling and preparing agendas for meetings 4 of the independent directors; serving as a liaison between the chief executive officer and the independent directors; being available, under appropriate circumstances, for consultation and direct communication with stockholders; ensuring our board of directors is fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in strategy, risk oversight and succession planning; and performing such other functions and responsibilities as requested by our board of directors from time to time. Currently, our board of directors believes that it is in the best interest of our company and our stockholders for our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Woodman, to serve as both Chief Executive Officer and Chairman given his knowledge of our company and industry and strategic vision. Because Mr. Woodman has served and continues to serve in both these roles, our board of directors appointed Kenneth Goldman to serve as our lead independent director in April 2017, replacing Michael Marks who previously held that position from 2014 to April 2017. As lead independent directors in 2017, Messrs. Marks and Goldman, among other responsibilities during their respective tenures, presided over regularly scheduled meetings at which only our independent directors were present to foster open and honest communication, and served as a liaison between the Chairman and the President and the independent directors, and performed such additional duties as our board of directors may otherwise determine and delegate. Michael Marks’ and Edward Gilhuly’s board service terms expired at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and we are deeply grateful for the significant contributions each of them made to our board. Our board of directors believes that its independence and oversight of management is maintained effectively through this leadership structure, the composition of our board of directors and sound corporate governance policies and practices. Our Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight Our board of directors is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. Our board of directors, as a whole, determines the appropriate level of risk for GoPro, assesses the specific risks that we face and reviews management’s strategies for adequately mitigating and managing the identified risks. Although our board of directors administers this risk management oversight function, the committees of our board of directors support our board of directors in discharging its oversight duties and address risks inherent in their respective areas. The audit committee reviews our major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including our procedures and related policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The compensation and leadership committee reviews risks and exposures associated with compensation plans and programs, including incentive plans. The nominating and corporate governance committee assists the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with our overall governance practices and the leadership structure of the board of directors (as described above under “Board Leadership Structure”). Our board of directors is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversights and other activities via regular reports of the committee chairs to the full board of directors. We believe this division of responsibilities is an effective approach for addressing the risks we face and that our board leadership structure supports this approach. Director Independence Our board of directors determines the independence of our directors by applying the applicable rules, regulations and listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) and applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. The applicable rules, regulations and listing standards of Nasdaq provide that a director is independent only if the board of directors affirmatively determines that the director does not have a relationship with the company which, in the opinion of the board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. They also specify various relationships that preclude a determination of director independence. Such relationships may include employment, commercial, accounting, family and other business, professional and personal relationships. Applying these standards, our board of directors annually reviews the independence of our directors, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances. In its most recent review, our board of directors considered, among other things, the relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director. 5 Our board of directors has determined that Messrs. Goldman, Gotcher, and Welts, and Mses. Lyne and Zalaznick, are “independent directors” as defined under the applicable rules, regulations and listing standards of Nasdaq and applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. All members of our audit committee, compensation and leadership committee and nominating and governance committee must be independent directors under the applicable rules, regulations and listing standards of Nasdaq. Members of the audit committee also must satisfy a separate SEC independence requirement, which provides that (i) they may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from GoPro or any of our subsidiaries other than their directors’ compensation, and (ii) they may not be an affiliated person of GoPro or any of our subsidiaries. Members of the compensation and leadership committee also must satisfy a separate SEC independence requirement and a related Nasdaq listing standard with respect to their affiliation with GoPro and any consulting, advisory or other fees they may have received from us. Our board of directors has determined that all members of our audit committee, compensation and leadership committee and nominating and governance committee are independent and satisfy the relevant SEC and Nasdaq independence requirements for such committees. Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance Our board of directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, and also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time. During 2017, our board of directors met sixteen times, including telephonic meetings, the audit committee held five meetings, the compensation and leadership committee held eight meetings, and the nominating and governance committee held five meetings. With the exception of Anthony Bates and Frederic Welts, none of the directors attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by our board of directors and by all committees of our board of directors on which such director served. Mr. Bates attended 68% of the meetings in 2017 and Mr. Welts, who was appointed to the Board in October 2017, attended 60% of the meetings since his appointment. Audit Committee Our audit committee is comprised of Mr. Goldman, who serves as the chair, Mr. Gotcher and Ms. Zalaznick. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the audit committee meets the requirements for independence under the applicable rules, regulations and listing standards of Nasdaq and applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Each member of our audit committee is financially literate. In addition, our board of directors has determined that Mr. Goldman is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). All audit services to be provided to us and all permissible non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm will be approved in advance by our audit committee. Our audit committee, among other things: • • • • • reviews the financial information which will be provided to stockholders and others; reviews our system of internal controls by consulting with management, our internal compliance team and the independent registered public accounting firm; appoints, retains and oversees the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm; oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements; pre-approves audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm; and • reviews related party transactions and proposed waivers of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. 6 Compensation and Leadership Committee Our compensation and leadership committee (“CLC”) is comprised of Mr. Gotcher, who serves as the chair, Mses. Lyne and Zalaznick and Mr. Welts. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our compensation and leadership committee meets the requirements for independence under current Nasdaq and SEC rules, regulations and listing standards. Each member of this committee is also a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) and is “independent” as defined in Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq rules and Rule 10C-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The purpose of our compensation and leadership committee is to carry out the responsibilities of our board of directors relating to compensation of our executive officers. Our compensation and leadership committee, among other things: • • • reviews and determines the compensation of our executive officers and other executives reporting to the Chief Executive Officer; administers our equity incentive plans; and establishes and reviews general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees. The compensation and leadership committee engaged an independent executive compensation consulting firm, Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), to evaluate our executive compensation program and practices and to provide advice and ongoing assistance on executive compensation matters for 2017. Specifically, Compensia was engaged to: • • • provide compensation-related data for a peer group of companies to serve as a basis for assessing competitive compensation practices; review and assess our current director policies and practices, Chief Executive Officer and other executive officer compensation policies and practices and equity profile relative to market practices (with director compensation review done for the benefit of the nominating and governance committee, which per its charter has responsibility for director compensation review and recommendation); review and assess our current executive compensation program relative to market to identify any potential changes or enhancements to be brought to the attention of the compensation and leadership committee; and • review market practices on employee stock purchase plans and other equity programs. During 2017, Compensia worked directly with the compensation and leadership committee (and not on behalf of management) to assist the committee in satisfying its responsibilities and undertook no projects for management without the committee’s prior approval. The compensation and leadership committee has determined that none of the work performed by Compensia during 2017 raised any conflicts of interest. Nominating and Governance Committee The nominating and governance committee is comprised of Ms. Zalaznick, who serves as the chair, Mr. Goldman and Ms. Lyne. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our nominating and governance committee meets the requirements for independence under current Nasdaq rules, regulations and listing standards. Our nominating and governance committee, among other things: • identifies, evaluates and recommends nominees, including stockholder nominees, to our board of directors and committees of our board of directors; • conducts searches for appropriate directors; 7 • • • • evaluates the performance of our board of directors and of individual directors; considers and makes recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition of our board of directors and its committees and related compensation (and was assisted in its 2017 director compensation review by Compensia); reviews developments in corporate governance practices; evaluates the adequacy of our corporate governance practices and reporting; and • makes recommendations to our board of directors concerning corporate governance matters. Compensation and Leadership Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation None of the members of our compensation and leadership committee has at any time been one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation and leadership committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving on our board of directors or our compensation and leadership committee. Board Attendance at Annual Stockholders’ Meeting Our policy is to invite and encourage each member of our board of directors to be present at our annual meeting of stockholders. With the exception of Messrs. Gilhuly and Marks, all of our then current directors were present at our 2017 virtual annual meeting of stockholders held on June 6, 2017. Communication with Directors Stockholders and interested parties who wish to communicate with our board of directors, non-management members of our board of directors as a group, a committee of our board of directors or a specific member of our board of directors (including our Chairman or lead independent director) may do so by letters addressed to the attention of our General Counsel. All communications are reviewed by our General Counsel and provided to the members of our board of directors consistent with a screening policy providing that unsolicited items, sales materials, abusive, threatening or otherwise inappropriate materials and other routine items and items unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of our board of directors shall not be relayed on to directors. Any communication that is not relayed is recorded in a log and made available to our board of directors. The address for these communications is: GoPro, Inc. c/o General Counsel 3000 Clearview Way San Mateo, California 94402 8 NOMINATIONS PROCESS AND DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS Nomination to the Board of Directors Candidates for nomination to our board of directors are selected by our board of directors based on the recommendation of the nominating and governance committee in accordance with the committee’s charter, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the criteria adopted by our board of directors regarding director candidate qualifications. In recommending candidates for nomination, the nominating and governance committee considers candidates recommended by directors, officers, employees, stockholders and others, using the same criteria to evaluate all candidates. Evaluations of candidates generally involve a review of background materials, internal discussions and interviews with selected candidates as appropriate and, in addition, the committee may engage consultants or third-party search firms to assist it in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. Susan Lyne and Frederic Welts were appointed to our board of directors in April 2017 and October 2017, respectively. Ms. Lyne was appointed after board member Lauren Zalaznick introduced Ms. Lyne to the nominating and governance committee for consideration. Mr. Welts was appointed after board member Kenneth Goldman introduced Mr. Welts to the nominating and governance committee for consideration. Additional information regarding the process for properly submitting stockholder nominations for candidates for membership on our board of directors is set forth below under “Additional Information – Stockholder Proposals to Be Presented at Next Annual Meeting.” Director Qualifications With the goal of developing a diverse, experienced and highly qualified board of directors, the nominating and governance committee is responsible for developing and recommending to our board of directors the desired qualifications, expertise and characteristics of members of our board of directors, including qualifications that the committee believes must be met by a committee-recommended nominee for membership on our board of directors and specific qualities or skills that the committee believes are necessary for one or more of the members of our board of directors to possess. Since the identification, evaluation and selection of qualified directors is a complex and subjective process that requires consideration of many intangible factors, and will be significantly influenced by the particular needs of our board of directors from time to time, our board of directors has not adopted a specific set of minimum qualifications, qualities or skills that are necessary for a nominee to possess, other than those that are necessary to meet U.S. legal, regulatory and Nasdaq listing requirements and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters of the board committees. When considering nominees, our nominating and governance committee may take into consideration many factors, including among other things, a candidate’s independence, integrity, diversity (inclusive of age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender identity, in accordance with the nominating and governance committee charter), skills, knowledge about our business or industry, willingness and ability to devote adequate time and effort to the board of directors responsibilities in the context of the existing composition, knowledge about other areas that are expected to contribute to the board of directors’ overall effectiveness, and needs of the board of directors and its committees. Our board of directors and nominating and governance committee believe that a diverse, experienced and highly qualified board of directors fosters a robust, comprehensive and balanced decision-making process for the continued effective functioning of our board of directors and success of the Company. Accordingly, through the nomination process, the nominating and governance committee seeks to promote board membership that reflects a diversity of business experience, expertise, viewpoints, personal backgrounds and characteristics that are expected to contribute to our board of directors’ overall effectiveness. The brief biographical description of each director set forth in Proposal 1 below includes the primary individual experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of our directors that led to the conclusion that each director should serve as a member of our board of directors at this time. 9 PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Our board of directors currently consists of eight directors. Seven of our directors will stand for election at the Annual Meeting to be held on June 5, 2018 and shall serve for a one-year term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and until such director’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until such director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal. Shares represented by proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the seven nominees named below, unless the proxy is marked to “WITHOLD” authority to so vote. If any nominee for any reason is unable to serve or for good cause will not serve, the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominee as the proxy holder might determine. Each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. Nominees to the Board of Directors The nominees, their ages, occupations, and length of board service as of April 20, 2018 are provided in the table below. Additional biographical descriptions of each nominee are set forth in the text below the table. Name of Director/Nominee Nicholas Woodman Kenneth Goldman(1)(2) † Peter Gotcher(1)(3) Alexander Lurie Susan Lyne(2)(3) Frederic Welts(3) Lauren Zalaznick(1)(2)(3) Age 42 68 58 44 66 65 54 Principal Occupation Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, GoPro, Inc. Former Chief Financial Officer, Yahoo! Inc. Independent Investor Chief Executive Officer, SurveyMonkey, Inc. President and Managing Partner, BBG Ventures LLC President and Chief Operating Officer, Golden State Warriors Media Executive Director Since 2004 2013 2014 2016 2017 2017 2016 (1) (2) (3) † Member of the audit committee Member of the nominating and governance committee Member of the compensation and leadership committee Lead Independent Director Nicholas Woodman founded GoPro and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors since 2004, as Chairman since January 2014 and as President from 2004 until June 2014. Mr. Woodman got his start in 1998 by founding an online gaming company, Funbug.com. When that venture failed in 2001, Mr. Woodman planned an international surfing trip to look for inspiration. While preparing for that trip, Mr. Woodman had the idea for a 35mm film-based wrist camera that could be worn during sports like surfing, enabling the user to capture images while engaged in the sport. This idea became GoPro’s first product, the HERO Camera. In the years that followed, Mr. Woodman, along with friends, family and employees, innovated on the HERO Camera concept along with a wide array of mounting devices that would make it easy to mount the camera to everything from helmets to surfboards, vehicles and more. Mr. Woodman holds a B.A. in Visual Arts from the University of California, San Diego. We believe Mr. Woodman’s experience as the founder of GoPro and his knowledge of our products and customers give him the experience and leadership capabilities that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors. Kenneth Goldman has served on our board of directors since December 2013 and as lead independent director of our board since April 2017. Mr. Goldman has served as the President of Hillspire LLC, a wealth management service provider, since September 2017. From October 2012 to June 2017, Mr. Goldman served as the Chief Financial Officer of Yahoo! Inc., an Internet commerce website, where he was responsible for Yahoo’s global finance functions including financial planning and analysis, controllership, tax, treasury, and investor relations. From September 2007 to October 2012, Mr. Goldman was the Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Fortinet Inc., a provider of threat management technologies. From November 2006 to August 2007, Mr. Goldman served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dexterra, Inc., a mobile enterprise software company. From August 2000 until March 2006, Mr. Goldman served 10 as Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Siebel Systems, Inc., a supplier of customer software solutions and services. Previously, Mr. Goldman has been the Chief Financial Officer of Sybase, Inc. (acquired by SAP SE), Excite@Home, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation and VLSI Technology, Inc. (acquired by Philips Electronics). Mr. Goldman currently serves on the board of directors of NXP Semiconductor N.V., TriNet, Inc., RingCentral, Inc., and Zuora, Inc. as well as the Trustee Emeritus of Cornell University. Previously, Mr. Goldman served on the board of directors of Gigamon Inc. and Infinera Corporation. From December 1999 to December 2003, Mr. Goldman served on the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB’s) primary Advisory Council (FASAC). From January 2015 to December 2017, Mr. Goldman was appointed to a three-year term to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB) Standing Advisory Group (SAG), an organization that provides advice on the need to formulate new accounting standards or change existing standards. Mr. Goldman holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Goldman is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his experience on the boards of directors of numerous companies, his extensive executive experience, and his service as a member of FASAC and SAG. He provides a high level of expertise and significant leadership experience in the areas of finance, accounting, and audit oversight. Peter Gotcher has served on our board of directors since June 2014. Mr. Gotcher is an independent private investor focusing on investments in digital media technology companies. From September 1999 to June 2002, Mr. Gotcher was a venture partner with Redpoint Ventures, a private investment firm. Prior to that, Mr. Gotcher was a venture partner with Institutional Venture Partners, a private investment firm, from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Gotcher founded Digidesign, Inc., a manufacturer of digital audio workstations, and served as its President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman from 1984 until it was acquired by Avid Technology, a media software company, in 1995. He served as the Executive Vice President of Avid Technology from 1995 to 1996. Mr. Gotcher currently serves as the Chairman of the board of directors of Dolby Laboratories, Inc. He also serves on the board of trustees of Santa Clara University. Mr. Gotcher holds a B.A. in English Literature from the University of California at Berkeley. We believe Mr. Gotcher is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his broad understanding of the operational, financial, and strategic issues facing public companies and his background providing guidance to companies in the digital media industry. Alexander Lurie has served on our board of directors since February 2016. Since January 2016, Mr. Lurie has served as the Chief Executive Officer of SurveyMonkey, Inc., a creator and publisher of online surveys, and he has served as a member of the board of SurveyMonkey since 2009, including as Chairman of the Board from July 2015 to January 2016. Mr. Lurie served as GoPro’s Senior Vice President of Media from November 2014 until January 2016. From February 2013 to January 2014, Mr. Lurie served as Executive Vice President for Guggenheim Digital Media, an internet media company. From April 2010 to August 2012, Mr. Lurie served as SVP, Strategic Development at CBS Corporation, a mass media corporation. From February 2008 to April 2010, Mr. Lurie served as Chief Financial Officer and Head of Business Development for CBS Interactive, a division of CBS Corporation. Mr. Lurie came to CBS Interactive via its acquisition of CNET Networks, a technology information website, where he served as Chief Financial Officer and head of Corporate Development from February 2006 to February 2008. Mr. Lurie began his career in the investment banking group at JPMorgan where he led equity transactions and mergers and acquisitions in the Internet sector. He holds a J.D. and M.B.A. degree from Emory University, and a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Washington. We believe Mr. Lurie is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his previous experience as an executive officer of GoPro, his operational and financial expertise from his management experience, and his background in the digital media industry. Susan Lyne has served on our board of directors since April 2017. Since September 2014, Ms. Lyne has served as President and Managing Partner of BBG Ventures, an AOL-backed investment fund focused on women-led tech startups. From February 2013 to September 2014, Ms. Lyne was Chief Executive Officer of the AOL Brand Group where she oversaw the content brands of AOL, Inc., a global media technology company, including TechCrunch, Engadget, StyleList, Moviefone and MapQuest. From September 2008 to February 2013, she was Chief Executive Officer and then Chair of Gilt Groupe, Inc., the innovative ecommerce company that pioneered flash sales in the United States. From 2004 to 2008, Ms. Lyne served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., a diversified media and merchandising company. From 1996 to 2004, Ms. Lyne held various positions at The Walt Disney Company, a diversified worldwide 11 entertainment company, including President of ABC Entertainment where she oversaw the development of shows including Desperate Housewives, Grey’s Anatomy, and Lost. Ms. Lyne is currently a director of Brit Media, Inc. and has previously served as a director of Gilt Groupe, Inc., AOL, Inc., Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Starz Entertainment Group, LLC. In addition, Ms. Lyne is a member of the Rockefeller University Council and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. We believe Ms. Lyne is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on her experience on the boards of directors of other companies, her extensive executive experience and her background in the media and consumer products industries. Frederic Welts has served on our board of directors since October 2017. Since October 2011, Mr. Welts has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Golden State Warriors, a team in the National Basketball Association (NBA). From 2002 to 2011, Mr. Welts was President of the Phoenix Suns, a team in the NBA, serving the organization as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to 2011. From 1982 to 1999, Mr. Welts held various positions at the NBA league office in New York, including as the Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer and President of NBA Properties. Since 2014, Mr. Welts has served as a board member of the Bay Area Council and, since 2011, Mr. Welts has served as a board member of the Warriors Community Foundation. Since 2014, Mr. Welts has also served as a member of the NBA’s Team Advisory Committee and, since 2017, he has served on the NBA’s Global Inclusion Council. We believe Mr. Welts is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on his extensive executive experience and marketing expertise. Lauren Zalaznick has served on our board of directors since July 2016. Since January 2014, Ms. Zalaznick has been serving as a board member and senior advisor to several companies: she is currently a member of the boards of directors of RTL Group (since April 2018), The Nielsen Company (since April 2016) and Shazam (since April 2014), and she is a board observer of Refinery29, a private company (since November 2017). In addition, she is currently a senior advisor to various content and tech start-ups including LifePosts, and Medium.com. From 2004 through December 2013, Ms. Zalaznick held various roles of increasing responsibility within NBCUniversal, Inc. including Chairman, Entertainment & Digital Networks and Integrated Media where she had responsibility for the Bravo, Oxygen, Style, Telemundo and Mun2 networks and ran its digital portfolio. She was Executive Vice President at NBCUniversal, Inc. until departing the company in December 2013. Since July 2011, Ms. Zalaznick has been a trustee of the Corporation of Brown University from which she graduated with a Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. We believe Ms. Zalaznick is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors based on her operational and management expertise and her background in digital media and content strategy. There are no family relationships among our current directors and officers. Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements In June 2014, our board of directors adopted a non-employee director compensation policy, which was subsequently amended in August 2015, with the equity changes effective after the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders and the cash retainer changes effective in October 2015. Pursuant to our non-employee director compensation policy in effect prior to our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director was to receive a stock option having a grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”) equal to $150,000 immediately following each annual meeting of stockholders. Each such stock option had a ten-year term and vested in full on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant or on the date of the next annual meeting of our stockholders, subject to the director’s continuous service on our board of directors at such time. In addition, immediately following the annual meeting of our stockholders, each non-employee director was to receive Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) having a grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 equal to $30,000. The shares underlying each RSU grant vested as to 25% in each quarter following the date of grant with the final 25% to vest on the earlier of the date of the annual meeting or the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continuous service on our board of directors at such time. The stock options and RSUs described above will accelerate and vest in full in the event of a change in control as defined under our 2014 Plan. 12 Pursuant to the current non-employee director compensation policy, immediately following each annual meeting of stockholders starting in 2016, we pay each non-employee director a cash retainer of $50,000. We also grant each non- employee director a stock option having a grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 equal to $122,500, based on a three-month trailing average of our closing stock price. Each such stock option will have a ten-year term and will vest in full on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant or on the date of the next annual meeting of our stockholders, subject to the director’s continuous service on our board of directors at such time. In addition, we grant each non-employee director RSUs having a grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 equal to $122,500, based on a three-month trailing average of our closing price. The shares underlying each RSU grant will vest as to 25% in each quarter following the date of grant with the final 25% to vest on the earlier of the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders or the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continuous service on our board of directors at such time. The stock options and RSUs described above will accelerate and vest in full in the event of a change in control as defined under our 2014 Plan. Directors who are appointed to our board of directors between the annual meetings of our stockholders will receive pro-rated stock option and RSU grants. Accordingly, Ms. Lyne who was appointed to our board of directors in April 2017, between the 2016 and 2017 annual meetings of stockholders, and Mr. Welts who was appointed to our board of directors in October 2017, between the 2017 and 2018 annual meetings of stockholders, received pro-rated stock option and RSU grants in accordance with the policy described in this paragraph. In addition to the cash retainers and the annual stock option and RSU grants for service as a member of our board of directors, our non-employee director compensation policy provides for additional cash retainers to the lead independent director and the chairs and members of each committee of our board of directors equal to the following: • $20,000 for the lead independent director; • • • • • • $25,000 for the chair of our audit committee; $12,500 for audit committee member (other than the chair); $18,500 for the chair of our compensation and leadership committee; $10,000 for compensation and leadership committee member (other than the chair); $10,000 for the chair of our nominating and governance committee; and $5,000 for nominating and governance committee member (other than the chair). Non-employee directors receive no other form of remuneration, perquisites or benefits, but are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings. 13 Director Compensation The following table provides information for 2017 concerning all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each person who served as a non-employee director for some portion of 2017. Nicholas Woodman, our Chief Executive Officer, is not included in the table below because he did not receive additional compensation for his services as a director. His compensation as an employee is shown below in “Executive Compensation – Summary Compensation Table.” Name Anthony Bates Edward Gilhuly Kenneth Goldman Peter Gotcher Alexander Lurie Susan Lyne Michael Marks Frederic Welts Lauren Zalaznick Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($)(1) Option Awards ($)(1) Total ($) — 60,442 76,596(2) 77,156 50,000 28,236 54,313 — 71,606(9) — — 122,672(3) 122,672(3) 122,672(3) 137,937(5) — 76,080(7) 122,672(3) — — 122,649(4) 122,649(4) 122,649(4) 140,118(6) — 76,824(8) 122,649(4) —(10) 60,442 321,917 322,477 295,321 306,291 54,313 152,904 316,927 (1) The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date value of RSUs or option awards, as applicable, made to directors in 2017 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (2) Mr. Goldman was appointed lead independent director immediately following the annual stockholder meeting in June 2017. $20,000 in fees for services as lead independent director will be paid in 2018. (3) On June 6, 2017, Messrs. Goldman, Gotcher and Lurie and Ms. Zalaznick each received an award of 14,449 RSUs which vested as to 25% of the shares subject to the award in each quarter following the date of grant, with the final 25% to vest on June 5, 2018, the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to the director’s continuous service on our board of directors on such date. As of December 31, 2017, 7,225 of the RSUs remained unvested for each board member. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), these RSUs will accelerate and become immediately vested. (4) On June 6, 2017, Messrs. Goldman, Gotcher and Lurie and Ms. Zalaznick each received a grant of options to purchase 31,336 shares of common stock which will vest in full on June 5, 2018, the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to the director’s continuous service on our board of directors on such date. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), these Options will accelerate and become immediately vested and exercisable. (5) Ms. Lyne joined GoPro’s board of directors on April 21, 2017. On April 21, 2017, Ms. Lyne received a pro-rated award of 1,721 RSUs which vested in full on June 6, 2017, the date of our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. On June 6, 2017, Ms. Lyne received an award of 14,449 RSUs which vests as to 25% of the shares subject to the award in each quarter following the date of grant, with the final 25% to vest on June 5, 2018, the date of our Annual meeting, subject to Ms. Lyne’s continuous service on our board of directors on such date. As of December 31, 2017, 7,225 of the RSUs remain unvested. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), these RSUs will accelerate and become immediately vested. (6) Ms. Lyne joined GoPro’s board of directors on April 21, 2017. On April 21, 2017, Ms. Lyne received a pro-rated grant of options to purchase 4,272 shares of common stock which vested in full on June 6, 2017, the date of our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. On June 6, 2017, Ms. Lyne received a grant of options to purchase 31,336 shares of common stock which will vest in full on June 5, 2018, the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to Ms. Lyne’s continuous service on our board of directors on such date. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), these Options will accelerate and become immediately vested and exercisable. (7) Mr. Welts joined GoPro’s board of directors on October 27, 2017. On October 27, 2017, Mr. Welts received a pro-rated award of 7,608 RSUs which vested as to 33% of the shares subject to the award in each quarter following the date of grant, with the final 33% to vest on June 5, 2018, the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to Mr. Welts’ continuous service on our board of directors on such date. As of December 31, 2017, 5,072 of the RSUs remain unvested. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), these RSUs will accelerate and become immediately vested. (8) Mr. Welts joined GoPro’s board of directors on October 27, 2017. On October 27, 2017, Mr. Welts received a pro-rated grant of options to purchase 17,272 shares of common stock which will vest in full on June 5, 2018, the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to Mr. Welts’ continuous service on our board of directors on such date. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), such Options will accelerate and become immediately vested and exercisable. (9) Ms. Zalaznick was a member of the nominating and governance committee in 2017 and became chair of the nominating and governance committee in February 2017. $534 in prorated annual fees for services during 2017 as chair of the nominating and governance committee was paid in 2018. (10) Mr. Bates received no compensation in 2017 for services as a director. As a former employee of the Company (whose employment as GoPro’s President terminated on December 31, 2016) and pursuant to his separation agreement, certain of Mr. Bates’ stock options remained fully vested and outstanding in lieu of compensation for Mr. Bates’ board service. 14 Our non-employee directors held option and RSU awards to acquire the following number of shares as of December 31, 2017: Name Anthony Bates Edward Gilhuly Kenneth Goldman Peter Gotcher Alexander Lurie Susan Lyne Michael Marks Frederic Welts Lauren Zalaznick Number of Shares Underlying Outstanding Awards Option Awards RSU Awards 2,751,024(1,2,3) — 151,197(5) 79,480(6) 67,785 35,608 — 17,272 55,415 4,470(4) — 7,225 7,225 7,225 7,225 — 5,072 7,225 (1) Mr. Bates terminated employment as GoPro’s President on December 31, 2016. Pursuant to Mr. Bates’ separation agreement 2,277,106 stock options priced at $18.40, 9,253 stock options priced at $44.48 and 455,413 stock options priced at $10.92, all of which were granted when he was an employee, are fully vested and remain outstanding in lieu of compensation for Mr. Bates’ board service. (2) Pursuant to Mr. Bates’ separation agreement, 9,252 stock options priced at $44.48 which were granted when he was an employee continued to vest in lieu of compensation for Mr. Bates’ board service. These Options will vest over a six-month period as follows: 1/6th of the shares vested on March 9, 2018, and 1/6th of the shares vest monthly thereafter through August 9, 2018, subject to Mr. Bates’ continuous status as an employee or service provider through each applicable date. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), such options shall accelerate and become immediately vested and exercisable. (3) Consists of options to purchase 2,277,106 shares of Class B common stock under an option award granted pursuant to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) and 473,918 shares of Class A common stock under option awards granted pursuant to our 2014 Plan. (4) Pursuant to Mr. Bates’ separation agreement, 4,470 RSUs which were granted when he was an employee shall continue to vest in lieu of compensation for Mr. Bates’ board service. These RSUs will vest over a six-month period as follows: 1/6th vested on March 15, 2018, and 1/6th vests monthly thereafter through August 15, 2018, subject to Mr. Bates’ continuous status as an employee or service provider through each such date. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2014 Plan), these RSUs will accelerate and become immediately vested. (5) Consists of options to purchase 95,000 shares of Class B common stock under an option award granted pursuant to our 2010 Plan and 56,197 shares of Class A common stock under option awards granted pursuant to our 2014 Plan. (6) Consists of options to purchase 17,234 shares of Class B common stock under an option award granted pursuant to our 2010 Plan and 62,246 shares of Class A common stock under option awards granted pursuant to our 2014 Plan. OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINATED DIRECTORS 15 PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Our audit committee has re-appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as GoPro’s independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of GoPro’s consolidated financial statements for 2018 and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of such selection. Although ratification by stockholders is not required by law, GoPro has determined that it is good practice to request ratification of this selection by the stockholders. In the event that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is not ratified by our stockholders, the audit committee will review its future selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as GoPro’s independent registered public accounting firm. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP audited GoPro’s for 2017 and 2016. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, in which case they will be given an opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. financial statements Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services We regularly review the services and fees from our independent registered public accounting firm. These services and fees are also reviewed with our audit committee annually. In accordance with standard policy, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP periodically rotates the individuals who are responsible for GoPro’s audit. The following table shows the fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: Fees Billed to GoPro Audit fees(1) Audit-related fees Tax fees(2) All other fees(3) Total fees $ $ 2017 2016 2,836,200 $ — 354,100 2,700 3,193,000 $ 2,603,700 — 462,800 — 3,066,500 (1) (2) (3) “Audit fees” include fees for audit services primarily related to the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting; the review of our quarterly financial statements; comfort letters, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC; and audit services provided in connection with other statutory and regulatory filings. “Tax fees” include fees for tax compliance, advice and planning. Tax advice fees encompass a variety of permissible tax services, including technical tax advice related to federal, state and international income tax matters, transfer pricing, international tax structure planning, assistance with indirect sales tax and assistance with tax audits. “All other fees” include fees for products and services, namely software subscription fees. Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Our audit committee’s policy is to preapprove all audit and permissible non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit- related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to report periodically to the audit committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All of the services relating to the fees described in the table above were approved by our audit committee. OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL NO. 2 16 APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE LIMIT ON AWARDS THAT MAY BE MADE TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS PROPOSAL NO. 3 Proposal Our 2014 Plan, which became effective in June 2014 in connection with our initial public offering and was amended in 2016, provides for the grant of awards to eligible employees, directors, consultants, independent contractors and advisors in the form of stock options, restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, stock appreciation rights, RSUs and performance awards. Our board of directors, on the recommendation of its nominating and governance committee, and compensation and leadership committee (also referred to herein as CLC), is submitting this proposal to amend our 2014 Plan to change the limit on the awards that may be granted to a non-employee director in any calendar year from 1,000,000 shares to $700,000 in aggregate value of awards. This proposal does not increase the total number of shares authorized for issuance under our 2014 Plan. If stockholder approval of this proposal is not obtained, the limit on the awards that may be granted to non-employee directors in any calendar year will remain 1,000,000 shares. Summary of the 2014 Plan The below is a summary of the principal features of the 2014 Plan. This summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of all of the provisions of the 2014 Plan. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the 2014 Plan, as amended and including the French Subplan, which is attached as Appendix A hereto. We adopted the 2014 Plan, which became effective in June 2014, as the successor to our 2010 Plan. We amended the 2014 Plan in June 2016. Our 2014 Plan provides for the grant of awards to our employees, directors, consultants, independent contractors and advisors, provided the consultants, independent contractors, directors and advisors render services that are not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. As of March 31, 2018, a total of 24,678,006 shares were available for issuance under the 2014 Plan and the French Subplan, subject to adjustment to reflect stock splits, reorganizations and similar events. The number of shares reserved for issuance under our 2014 Plan will increase automatically on the first day of January of each of 2019 through 2024 by the number of shares equal to 3% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock (which includes outstanding shares of our Class A common stock, outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, outstanding stock options and outstanding RSUs) as of the immediately preceding December 31. However, our board of directors may reduce the amount of the increase in any particular year. In addition, the following shares are available for grant and issuance under our 2014 Plan: • • • • shares subject to stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under our 2014 Plan that cease to be subject to the stock option or stock appreciation right for any reason other than exercise of the stock option or stock appreciation right; shares subject to awards granted under our 2014 Plan that are subsequently forfeited or repurchased by us at the original issue price; shares subject to awards granted under our 2014 Plan that otherwise terminate without shares being issued; shares subject to awards under our 2014 Plan that are used to pay the exercise price of a stock option or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award; • shares surrendered, cancelled, or exchanged for cash or a different award (or combination thereof); 17 • • • shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options or subject to other awards under our 2010 Plan that cease to be subject to such stock options or other awards by forfeiture or otherwise; shares issued under our 2010 Plan that are forfeited or repurchased by us; and shares subject to awards under our 2010 Plan that are used to pay the exercise price of a stock option or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award. No participant may be granted awards covering more than 3,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock under the 2014 Plan during any calendar year, other than new employees, who are eligible to receive no more than 6,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock under the 2014 Plan in the calendar year in which any such employee commences employment. No more than 134,702,290 shares shall be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options. The exercise price of stock options must be at least equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. In addition, without giving effect to the amendment as proposed herein, the maximum number of shares subject to awards granted to each of our non-employee directors, pursuant to Section 12 of the 2014 Plan, in any calendar year shall not exceed 1,000,000. Following discussions with our independent executive compensation consulting firm, Compensia, and a review of the market practices of our peer group, our CLC determined that the 2014 Plan limit on non-executive director equity awards should be revised so that in any calendar year the maximum number of shares subject to awards granted to each of our non-employee directors will not exceed $700,000 in aggregate value of awards. Our board of directors approved the inclusion of Proposal No. 3 to revise the 2014 Plan to implement this limit, subject to the approval of our stockholders. Our current policy for non-employee director compensation, as described above under “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors – Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements” provides that each non-employee director shall annually receive a stock option having a grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 equal to $122,500 and an RSU with a grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 equal to $122,500. The aggregate value of these annual awards is $245,000, which is below the proposed limit contained in this Proposal No. 3. We are proposing this change to our 2014 Plan to establish an upper limit on the value of awards that may be granted to non-employee directors in any calendar year, and give us the flexibility to increase non-employee director compensation if the CLC, in consultation with its independent executive consulting firm, determines that a change is advisable and in alignment with compensation practices among our peer group. As of December 31, 2017, approximately 1,273 employees, approximately 131 consultants and independent contractors, and 7 non-employee directors were eligible to participate in the 2014 Plan. Administration of the 2014 Plan Our 2014 Plan is administered by the CLC, all of the members of which are outside directors as defined under applicable federal tax laws, or by our board of directors acting in place of the CLC. The CLC has the authority to construe and interpret our 2014 Plan, grant awards and make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the plan. Individuals participate in the 2014 Plan on the basis of the CLC’s exercise of its discretion to grant awards under the 2014 Plan. The CLC has the authority to reprice any outstanding stock award (by reducing the exercise price of any outstanding option, canceling an option in exchange for cash or another equity award or any other action that may be deemed a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles) under the 2014 Plan without the approval of our stockholders. Awards That May Be Granted Under the 2014 Plan Incentive and nonstatutory stock options are granted pursuant to incentive and nonstatutory stock option agreements adopted by the CLC. The CLC determines the exercise price for a stock option, within the terms and conditions of the 2014 Plan, provided that the exercise price of a stock option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant, except where a higher exercise price is required in the case of certain incentive stock options, as described below. 18 We anticipate that in general, stock options will vest over a two-year to four-year period. Stock options may vest based on time or achievement of performance conditions. The CLC may provide for options to be exercised only as they vest or to be immediately exercisable with any shares issued on exercise being subject to our right of repurchase that lapses as the shares vest. The CLC determines the term of stock options granted under the 2014 Plan, up to a maximum of 10 years. Unless the terms of an optionholder’s stock option agreement provide otherwise, if an optionholder’s service relationship with us, or any of our affiliates, ceases for any reason other than for cause, disability or death, the optionholder may exercise any vested stock options for a period of three months following the cessation of service. If an optionholder’s service relationship with us or any of our affiliates is terminated for cause, then the option terminates immediately. If an optionholder’s service relationship with us or any of our affiliates terminates due to disability, the optionholder may exercise any vested options for a period of six months. If an optionholder’s service relationship with us or any of our affiliates ceases due to death, or an optionholder dies within three months following termination of service other than for cause or due to disability, the optionholder or a beneficiary may exercise any vested options for a period of 12 months. The option term may be extended in the event that exercise of the option following termination of service is prohibited by applicable securities laws. In no event, however, may an option be exercised beyond the expiration of its maximum term. Unless the CLC provides otherwise, stock options generally are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. An optionholder may, however, designate a beneficiary who may exercise the stock option following the optionholder’s death, subject to local laws and restrictions on enforcement. Restricted stock awards are granted pursuant to restricted stock award agreements adopted by the CLC. A restricted stock award is an offer by us to sell shares of our Class A common stock subject to restrictions. The price, if any, of a restricted stock award is determined by the CLC. Shares of Class A common stock acquired under a restricted stock award may, but need not, be subject to a share repurchase option or forfeiture restriction in our favor in accordance with a vesting schedule to be determined by the CLC. Rights to acquire shares under a restricted stock award may be transferred only upon such terms and conditions as set by the CLC. Except as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, restricted stock awards that have not vested will be forfeited or subject to repurchase upon the participant’s cessation of continuous service for any reason. RSUs are granted pursuant to RSU agreements adopted by the CLC. RSUs represent the right to receive shares of our Class A common stock at a specified date in the future, subject to forfeiture of that right because of termination of the holder’s services to us or the holder’s failure to achieve certain performance conditions. Stock appreciation rights are granted pursuant to stock appreciation rights agreements adopted by the CLC. Stock appreciation rights provide for a payment, or payments, in cash or shares of our Class A common stock, to the holder based upon the increase in the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of exercise from the stated exercise price (subject to any maximum number of shares as may be specified in the applicable award agreement). Stock appreciation rights may vest based on continued service or achievement of performance conditions. Stock appreciation rights expire under the same rules that apply to stock options. The 2014 Plan permits the grant of performance awards in the form of a cash bonus or an award of performance shares. Performance awards are distinct from the other equity awards (such as options, restricted stock awards, RSUs and stock appreciation rights) provided under the 2014 Plan. No person will be eligible to receive more than $1,000,000 in performance awards in any calendar year under the 2014 Plan. While other equity-based awards may be structured to vest, in whole or in part, upon the achievement of performance goals, those other awards are not performance awards within the meaning of the 2014 Plan and therefore are only subject to the per employee per calendar year share limitations discussed above, rather than this $1,000,000 limitation. The CLC may grant other awards based in whole or in part by reference to our Class A common stock. The CLC sets the number of shares under the award and all other terms and conditions of such awards. 19 In the event that there is a specified type of change in our capital structure, such as a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, combination, reclassification or similar change in the capital structure of our company, without consideration appropriate adjustments will be made to (a) the class and maximum number of shares reserved under the 2014 Plan, (b) the class and maximum number of shares subject to stock options, stock appreciation rights and performance stock awards that can be granted in a calendar year, (c) the class and maximum number of shares that may be issued upon exercise of incentive stock options, (d) the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to an individual or to a new employee in any one calendar year, and (e) the number of shares and exercise price, if applicable, of all outstanding stock awards. Corporate Transactions The 2014 Plan provides that, in the event of a sale, lease or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, or specified types of mergers or consolidations (each, a “corporate transaction”) any of the following may occur: outstanding awards may be continued if we are the successor entity; outstanding awards may be assumed by any surviving or acquiring corporation; the surviving or acquiring corporation may substitute similar awards for those outstanding; awards may be settled for the full value of such outstanding award (whether or not then vested or exercisable) in cash or securities of the successor entity with payment deferred until the date or dates the award would have become exercisable or vested; or the vesting, exercisability and expiration of outstanding awards may be accelerated. Awards held by directors who are not employees of ours or our parent or subsidiary companies will immediately vest as to all or any portion of the shares subject to the stock award and will become exercisable at such times and on such conditions as the CLC determines. Plan Suspension or Termination Our board of directors has the authority to suspend or terminate the 2014 Plan at any time provided that such action does not impair the existing rights of any participant. The 2014 Plan will terminate in May 2024 unless earlier terminated by our board of directors. History of Grants As of March 31, 2018, options to purchase a total of 5,786,743 shares of our Class A common stock had been granted under the 2014 Plan, of which 47,495 have been exercised and 2,702,389 remained outstanding with weighted-average exercise price of $13.926356 per share. As of March 31, 2018, 17,623,922 RSUs had been granted under the 2014 Plan, of which 6,490,987 RSUs remained outstanding. The closing price per share of our Class A common stock as reported by Nasdaq on the Record Date of April 12, 2018 was $5.22. The following table summarizes the grants made to all current directors who are not executive officers as a group, each nominee for election as a director and each associate (as defined under the Exchange Act) of any such directors, from the inception of the 2014 Plan through March 31, 2018: Name and Position Nicholas Woodman, Chief Executive Officer and Director Nominee Anthony Bates, Director(1) Kenneth Goldman, Director Nominee Peter Gotcher, Director Nominee Alexander Lurie, Director Nominee Susan Lyne, Director Nominee Frederic Welts, Director Nominee Lauren Zalaznick, Director Nominee All current director nominees who are not executive officers as a group (6 persons) Associates of any such directors, executive officers or nominees Number of Shares Underlying Options Number of Shares Underlying Other Awards 0 752,660 56,197 62,246 67,785 35,608 17,272 55,415 294,523 0 0 392,326 26,774 25,450 25,903 16,170 7,608 24,615 126,520 0 (1) Mr. Bates terminated employment as GoPro’s President on December 31, 2016. Pursuant to Mr. Bates’ separation agreement certain equity awards granted to him as an employee vested or continued to vest and remain outstanding in lieu of compensation for Mr. Bates’ board service. All such grants to Mr. Bates were made in connection with his employment at the company and not in connection with his services as a director. 20 Certain Interests of Directors In considering the recommendation of our board of directors with respect to this Proposal No. 3, stockholders should be aware that the members of our board of directors have certain interests that may present them with conflicts of interest in connection with such proposal. As discussed above, directors are eligible to receive awards under the 2014 Plan. Please see “Proposal No. 1 – Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements” and “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors – Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement for more detail about equity grants to our directors. Our board of directors recognizes that approval of this proposal may benefit our directors and their successors. See “Equity Compensation Plan Information” for more information about compensation plans under which shares of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock may be issued. OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN TO CHANGE THE LIMIT ON AWARDS THAT MAY BE MADE TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS. 21 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2018, by: • • • • each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock; each of our directors; each of our named executive officers (“NEOs”); and all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Percentage ownership of our common stock before this offering is based on 35,964,409 shares of our Class B common stock and 111,874,238 shares of our Class A common stock outstanding on March 31, 2018. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and thus represents voting or investment power with respect to our securities. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable. Shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018 or RSUs that may vest and settle within 60 days of March 31, 2018 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options or RSUs for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Name of Beneficial Owner Directors and Named Executive Officers: Nicholas Woodman(2) Ken Goldman(3) Peter Gotcher(4) Alexander Lurie(5) Lauren Zalaznick(6) Anthony Bates(7) Susan Lyne(8) Frederic Welts(9) Brian McGee(10) Sharon Zezima(11) Charles Prober(12) All executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)(13) 5% Stockholders Nicholas Woodman and Jill R. Woodman, as Co- Trustees of the Woodman Family Trust under Trust Agreement dated March 11, 2011(14) BlackRock, Inc.(15) The Vanguard Group - 23-1945930(16) Shares Beneficially Owned Class A Class B Shares % Shares % % of Total Voting Power(1) — 47,282 52,747 68,592 45,081 566,516 16,829 5,072 116,451 79,693 25,361 1,023,624 * * * * * * * * * * * * 35,820,130 95,000 73,212 — — 2,277,106 — — — 54,656 — 99.60% 75.97% * * * * 5.95% * * * * * * * * * 4.72% * * * * * 38,320,104 99.77% 77.35% — 6,887,094 8,866,037 * 6.16% 7.93% 27,794,122 — — 77.28% * * 58.95% 1.46% 1.88% * Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our outstanding shares of common stock of the designated class of security or less than 1% of the Total Voting Power, as applicable. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the individuals and entities named below is c/o GoPro, Inc., 3000 Clearview Way, San Mateo, California 94402. 22 (1) Percentage of total voting power represents voting power with respect to all shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, as a single class. The holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share, and holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share. (2) Consists of: (i) 27,794,122 shares of Class B common stock held by the Woodman Family Trust under Trust Agreement dated March 11, 2011 of which Nicholas Woodman and Jill Woodman are co-trustees, (ii) 663,004 shares of Class B common stock held by Mr. Woodman’s 2016 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (each such trust, “GRAT”), (iii) 663,004 shares of Class B common stock held by the 2016 GRAT for Mr. Woodman’s spouse, (iv) 1,350,000 shares of Class B common stock held by Mr. Woodman’s 2017 GRAT, (v) 1,350,000 shares of Class B common stock held by the 2017 GRAT for Mr. Woodman’s spouse, (vi) 2,000,000 shares of Class B common stock held by Mr. Woodman’s 2018 GRAT, and (vii) 2,000,000 shares of Class B common stock held by the 2018 GRAT for Mr. Woodman’s spouse. As a co-trustee, Mr. Woodman may be deemed to have shared voting and investment power over the shares owned by the Woodman Family Trust. Mr. Woodman is the sole trustee of all six (6) GRATs. (3) Consists of (i) 668 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Goldman, (ii) 21,753 shares of Class A common stock held in the Goldman-Valeriote Family Trust UAD 11/15/95, (iii) 95,000 shares of Class B common stock subject to options held by Mr. Goldman that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018, and (iv) 24,861 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Mr. Goldman that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. Kenneth Goldman and Susan Valeriote are co-trustees and have shared voting and investment power over the shares owned by the Goldman-Valeriote Family Trust. (4) Consists of: (i) 378 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Gotcher, (ii) 21,459 shares of Class A common stock held in The Peter and Marie- Helene Gotcher Family Trust, (iii) 54,348 shares of Class B common stock held by The Peter and Marie-Helene Gotcher Family Trust, (iv) 1,630 shares of Class B common stock held by Mr. Gotcher, (v) 17,234 shares of Class B common stock subject to options held by Mr. Gotcher that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018, and (vi) 30,910 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Mr. Gotcher that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. Mr. Gotcher is the President of The Peter and Marie-Helene Gotcher Family Trust. (5) Consists of (i) 32,143 shares of Class A common stock held by the Alexander J Lurie Trust dtd 10/16/2007, and (ii) 36,449 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Mr. Lurie that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. Mr. Lurie is the sole trustee and beneficiary of the Alexander J Lurie Trust dtd 10/16/2007. (6) Consists of (i) 21,002 shares of Class A common stock held by Lauren Zalaznick and Phelim Dolan, and (ii) 24,079 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Ms. Zalaznick that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. (7) Consists of (i) 95,734 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Bates, (ii) 469,292 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Mr. Bates that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018, (iii) 1,490 shares of Class A common stock subject to RSUs held by Mr. Bates that may settle within 60 days of March 31, 2018, and (iv) 2,277,106 shares of Class B common stock subject to options held by Mr. Bates that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. (8) Consists of (i) 12,557 shares of Class A common stock held by Ms. Lyne, and (ii) 4,272 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Ms. Lyne that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. (9) Consists of 5,072 shares of Class A common stock held by the Frederic K. Welts, Jr. Living Trust. Mr. Welts is the sole trustee and beneficiary of the Frederic K. Welts, Jr. Living Trust. (10) Consists of: (i) 276 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. McGee’s spouse, and (ii) 116,175 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Mr. McGee that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. (11) Consists of: (i) 5,834 shares of Class A common stock held by Ms. Zezima, (ii) 73,859 shares of Class A common stock subject to options held by Ms. Zezima that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018, and (iii) and 54,656 shares of Class B common stock subject to options held by Ms. Zezima that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. (12) Consists of 25,361 shares of Class A common stock held by Mr. Prober. (13) Consists of (i) 242,237 shares of Class A common stock, (ii) 35,876,108 shares of Class B common stock, (iii) 779,897 shares of Class A common stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018, (iv) 1,490 shares of Class A common stock subject to RSUs that may settle within 60 days of March 31, 2018, and (v) 2,443,996 shares of Class B common stock subject to options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2018. (14) Consists of 27,794,122 shares of Class B common stock held by the Woodman Family Trust under Trust Agreement dated March 11, 2011 of which Nicholas Woodman and Jill Woodman are co-trustees. As a co-trustee, Mr. Woodman may be deemed to have shared voting and investment power over the shares owned by the Woodman Family Trust. (15) Based on a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 1 filing made on January 25, 2018. Consists of 6,887,094 shares of Class A common stock held by BlackRock, Inc. The address for BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. (16) Based on a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 2 filing made on February 9, 2018. Consists of 8,866,037 shares of Class A common stock held by The Vanguard Group - 23-1945930. The address for The Vanguard Group - 23-1945930 is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. 23 The names of our current executive officers, their ages as of March 30, 2018, and their positions are shown below. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Executive Officers Nicholas Woodman Brian McGee Eve Saltman Sandor Barna Age Position(s) 42 58 53 49 Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer Our board of directors chooses executive officers, who then serve at the board’s discretion. There is no family relationship among any of our directors or executive officers. For information regarding Mr. Woodman, please refer to “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors” discussed above. Brian McGee has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since February 2018 and our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since March 2016. Mr. McGee served as our Vice President of Finance from September 2015 to March 2016, and was responsible for financial planning, tax, treasury and risk management in that role. From May 2011 to September 2015, Mr. McGee served in various positions at Qualcomm, most recently as the Vice President, Business Operations. Prior to Qualcomm, Mr. McGee was at Atheros Communications from December 2009 to May 2011 as the Vice President, General Manager Global Powerline Business. Prior to Atheros Communications, from January 2007 to December 2009, Mr. McGee was the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, at Intellon, a fabless semiconductor company that was acquired by Atheros Communications in December 2009. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. McGee was Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Lexar, a maker of digital media storage. Mr. McGee holds a B.S. in Finance from California Polytechnic State University (1983) and a Certificate in Management Accounting (1989). Eve Saltman has served as our Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary since March 2018. Ms. Saltman served as our Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from February 2017 to September 2017, our Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from July 2014 to February 2017, and our Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from January 2014 to July 2014. From September 2017 to March 2018, Ms. Saltman served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Asana, Inc., a web and mobile collaborative work management application. Prior to joining GoPro in 2014, Ms. Saltman served as VP, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary of OL2, Inc. dba OnLive, a provider of cloud gaming services from September 2012 to January 2014 and VP, Legal, OnLive, Inc., from September 2008 to August 2012. Since 2014, Ms. Saltman has also served as a director of Lexicon of Sustainability, Inc., a non-profit organization. Ms. Saltman holds a J.D. from Georgetown Law School and a B.A. in History from Cornell University. Sandor Barna has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer since February 2018. From December 2016 to February 2018, he served as our Vice President of Hardware Engineering and from October 2015 to December 2016 as our Vice President of Core Technology. From February 2015 to September 2015, Dr. Barna was Vice President of the Automotive and Scanning Division in the Image Sensor Group at ON Semiconductor, and from August 2014 to February 2015, Vice President Technology Development/Aptina CTO, a position he assumed after ON’s acquisition of Aptina Imaging in 2014. From October 2013 to August 2014, Dr. Barna was Chief Technology Officer at Aptina Imaging, and, from the company’s launch in July 2009, as Vice President and General Manager of Aptina Imaging’s Consumer Camera Business Unit. From 1997 to 2008, he held a variety of semiconductor engineering, research, and business strategy roles in Micron Technology’s Image Sensor Group and at Photobit Corporation. Dr. Barna holds a Ph.D. and an MA in Physics from Princeton University, and a BS in Physics from Yale University. 24 COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Introduction GoPro’s executive compensation programs, policies and practices (“ECPs”) are designed to reflect the three major tenets of our executive compensation philosophy, namely to: • Align executive compensation with achievement of our business objectives and financial performance; • Motivate executive officers to take actions that enhance long-term stockholder value; and • Enable us to attract, retain and reward our executives who contribute to our success. We manage our ECPs, including compensation-related corporate governance standards, in a manner consistent with our executive compensation philosophy. These ECPs are intended to both drive performance and either prohibit or minimize behaviors that we do not believe serve our stockholders’ long-term interests. Executive Compensation Best Practices Compensation and Leadership Committee Independence Our board of directors maintains a compensation and leadership committee comprised solely of independent directors. Compensation and Leadership Committee Advisor Independence Annual Compensation Review Compensation-Related Risk Assessment No Executive Perquisites “Double-Trigger” Change in Control Arrangements Reasonable Change in Control Arrangements The compensation and leadership committee engages and retains its own advisors. During 2017, the compensation and leadership committee engaged an independent national consulting firm to assist with its responsibilities and such firm performs no additional consulting or other services for GoPro. The compensation and leadership committee annually reviews our executive compensation philosophy and strategy, including reviewing our compensation peer group utilized for appropriate comparative purposes. We conduct annual evaluations of our compensation programs, policies, and practices to ensure that they reflect an appropriate level of risk-taking but do not encourage our employees to take excessive or unnecessary risks that could have a material adverse impact on GoPro. We do not offer perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers, including our NEOs except in situations where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive officers more efficient and effective, and for recruitment and retention purposes. Our executive officers, including our NEOs, participate in our health and welfare benefit programs on the same basis as all of our employees. The change in control post-employment compensation arrangements for our executive officers including our NEOs (other than an arrangement with Mr. Woodman, which contains a single-trigger) are based on a “double-trigger” arrangement that provides for the receipt of payments and benefits only in the event of (i) a change in control of our company, and (ii) a qualifying termination of employment. The post-employment compensation arrangements for our management team, including our NEOs, provide for amounts and multiples that are within reasonable market norms. 25 Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging Succession Planning Retirement Programs Compensation Recoupment Policy Stock Ownership Guidelines Our management team, including our NEOs, and the members of our board of directors, are prohibited from speculating in our equity securities, including the use of short sales, or any equivalent transaction involving our equity securities and from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to our equity securities. Our board of directors reviews the risks associated with our most critical executive positions on an annual basis so that we have an adequate succession strategy, and we have plans in place for these critical positions. Other than our Section 401(k) plan, which is generally available to all U.S. employees, we do not offer defined benefit or contribution retirement plans or arrangements or nonqualified deferred compensation plans or arrangements for our management team, including our NEOs. In 2016, we adopted a compensation recoupment policy applicable to cash incentive-based compensation awards paid to our executive officers. In the event of a substantial restatement of financial results filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the policy permits the board, if the board determines appropriate under the circumstances, and the executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional illegal conduct that materially contributed to the restatement, to seek recovery of all or any portion of the incentive awards paid or awarded to an executive officer in excess of the awards that would have been paid or awarded based on the restated financial results. In 2016, we adopted a stock ownership policy for our Chief Executive Officer, President, and non-employee directors to align their interests with those of our stockholders. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is intended to assist our stockholders in understanding our ECPs by presenting the following: 1. Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program sets forth our executive compensation philosophy and describes the programs, policies and practices we apply and utilize to support achievement of our corporate goals and performance objectives. 2. Further Considerations for Setting Executive Compensation discusses, among other things, the role of our compensation and leadership committee, consultants, peer group, and the impact of tax and accounting considerations. 3. Business Highlights for 2017 summarizes our business results that impacted our 2017 executive compensation decisions. 4. Executive Compensation Decisions for 2017 explains compensation decisions that were made last year based on our corporate results. 5. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements discusses employment agreements and policies associated with our current and departing executives. This CD&A focuses on the material elements of compensation of our NEOs as of December 31, 2017: • Nicholas Woodman, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors; 26 • Charles “CJ” Prober, our former Chief Operating Officer; • Brian McGee, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; and • Sharon Zezima, our former Senior Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary. • In early 2018, we implemented a company-wide restructuring of our business. In connection with this restructuring, the following changes to our executive officers occurred in the first quarter of 2018: • Charles “CJ” Prober, our Chief Operating Officer terminated employment effective February 16, 2018. • Sharon Zezima, our Senior Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary terminated employment effective March 30, 2018. • Brian McGee was promoted to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, effective February 2, 2018. • Sandor Barna was promoted to Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, effective February 2, 2018. • Eve T. Saltman was appointed our Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary, effective March 29, 2018. Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles We have designed our ECPs to reward our executive officers, including our NEOs, at a level consistent with our overall strategic and financial performance and to provide remuneration sufficient to attract, retain, and motivate them to exert their best efforts in the highly-competitive technology and consumer-oriented environments in which we operate. We have also designed our ECPs to reward our executive officers, including our NEOs, for superior performance. We believe that competitive compensation packages consisting of a combination of base salaries, annual cash bonus opportunities, and long-term incentive opportunities in the form of equity awards that are earned over a multi-year period, enable us to attract top talent, motivate effective short-term and long-term performance, and satisfy our retention objectives. As an overarching objective, we seek to design each pay element to align the compensation of our management team with our corporate performance and long-term value creation for our stockholders. That principle has guided the design of both the annual and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of our executive officers. The compensation and leadership committee periodically reviews and analyzes market trends and the prevalence of various compensation delivery vehicles and adjusts the design and operation of our executive compensation program from time to time as it deems necessary and appropriate. In designing and implementing the various elements of our executive compensation program, the compensation and leadership committee considers market and industry practices, among other data points. While the compensation and leadership committee considers all of these factors in its deliberations, and places no formal weighting on any one factor in its overall compensation strategy, our bonus plan does assign weights to specific performance metrics. As we continue to evolve as a publicly-traded company, the compensation and leadership committee will evaluate our compensation philosophy and program objectives as circumstances merit. At a minimum, we expect the compensation and leadership committee to review executive compensation annually. 27 Compensation Elements The three primary elements of our executive compensation program are: (i) base salary, (ii) annual cash bonus opportunities, and (iii) long-term incentives in the form of equity awards subject to multi-year vesting, in each case as described below: Compensation Element Base salary What This Element Rewards Individual of performance, experience, expected future performance and contributions. level Annual cash bonuses Long-term incentives/equity awards Achievement of pre-established corporate and individual performance objectives (for 2017, focused on our revenue growth, profitability and cost management, as well and individual as management objectives). contributions Corporate and individual performance that long-term stockholder value. enhance Vesting requirements promote retention of highly-valued executive officers. level of Purpose and Key Features of Element Provides competitive fixed compensation determined by the market value of the position, and the qualifications, experience and performance expectations of each executive officer and each individual position. Motivate executive officers to achieve during the fiscal year (i) short-term financial (ii) and operational objectives, and individual objectives. performance Performance levels are established to motivate our executive officers to achieve or exceed performance objectives. Annual stock options and RSUs that vest over three to four years and provide a variable “at risk” pay opportunity. Because the ultimate value of these equity awards is directly related to the market price of our Class A common stock, and the awards are vesting over an extended period of time, they serve to focus management on the creation and maintenance of long-term stockholder value and help us attract, retain, motivate, and reward executive officers. Our executive officers also participate in the standard employee benefit plans available to most of our employees. In addition, our executive officers are eligible for post-employment (severance and change in control) payments and benefits under certain circumstances. Each of these compensation elements is discussed in detail below, including a description of each particular element and how it fits into our overall executive compensation and a discussion of the amounts of compensation paid to our executive officers, including our NEOs, in 2017 under each of these elements. Base Salary We believe that a competitive base salary is a necessary element of our executive compensation program, so that we can attract and retain a stable and high-quality management team. Base salaries for our executive officers are intended to be competitive with those received by other individuals in similar positions at the companies with which we compete for talent, and to maintain internal parity across our executive team. Generally, we establish the initial base salaries of our executive officers through arm’s-length negotiation at the time we hire the individual executive officer, taking into account his or her position, qualifications, experience, and the base salaries of our other executive officers. Thereafter, the compensation and leadership committee reviews the base salaries of our executive officers, including our NEOs, at least annually. 28 Annual Cash Bonuses We use annual cash bonuses to motivate our executive officers, including our NEOs, to achieve our short-term financial and operational objectives while making progress towards our longer-term growth and other goals. Consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, these annual bonuses are intended to help us to deliver a competitive total direct compensation opportunity to our executive officers. Annual cash bonuses are entirely performance-based, are not guaranteed and may vary materially from year-to-year. In addition to the corporate performance objectives, the annual cash bonuses for our executive officers, including our NEOs, are also based on each executive officer’s individual performance. Individual performance goals for each executive officer are identified at the beginning of the year in discussions with our Chief Executive Officer. These goals may be quantitative or qualitative in nature, depending on the organizational priorities for a given year, and typically focus on key departmental or operational objectives or functions. Most of these goals are intended to provide a set of common objectives that facilitate collaborative management and engagement, although our executive officers could also be assigned individual objectives. Long-Term Incentives/Equity Awards We use long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards to motivate our executive officers, including our NEOs, by providing them with the opportunity to build an equity interest in GoPro and to share in the potential appreciation of the value of our common stock. Generally, in determining the size of the equity awards granted to our executive officers, the compensation and leadership committee takes into consideration the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to his own equity award), as well as the factors described above. The compensation and leadership committee also considers the dilutive effect of our long-term incentive compensation practices, and the overall impact that these equity awards, as well as awards to other employees, may have on stockholder value. Annual equity is awarded to NEOs in the form of stock options (the right to purchase shares of our Class A common stock at a predetermined price subject to time based vesting), and RSUs which represent the right to receive shares of our Class A common stock subject to time based vesting. Fifty percent of each NEO’s equity opportunity is delivered in stock options and 50% of the opportunity is delivered in RSUs (see “Executive Compensation Decisions for 2017 – Long Term Incentive Compensation” below). The compensation and leadership committee evaluates equity vehicles annually to determine which form of equity best aligns executive incentives with the long-term interest of our stockholders. The compensation and leadership committee may choose to utilize other performance-based equity vehicles. Welfare and Health Benefits We maintain a tax-qualified retirement plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for our U.S. employees, including our executive officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements, including requirements relating to age and length of service that provides them with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-advantaged basis. We intend for this plan to qualify under Sections 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code so that contributions by employees to the plan, and income earned on plan contributions, are not taxable to employees until distributed from the applicable plan. All participants’ interests in their deferrals are 100% vested when contributed under both plans. In 2017, we made matching contributions into the Section 401(k) plan for our employees, which are deductible when made by us. Under the plan, pre- tax contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participants’ directions. In addition, we provide other benefits to our executive officers, including our NEOs, on the same basis as all of our full- time employees. These benefits include health, dental and vision benefits, health and dependent care flexible spending 29 accounts, short-term and long-term disability insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, basic life insurance coverage and discretionary time-off. We do not offer our employees a non-qualified deferred compensation plan or pension plan. We design our employee benefits programs to be affordable and competitive in relation to the market, as well as compliant with applicable laws and practices. We adjust our employee benefits programs as needed based upon regular monitoring of applicable laws and practices, the competitive market and our employees’ needs. Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits Currently, we do not view perquisites or other personal benefits as a component of our executive compensation program. Accordingly, we do not provide perquisites to our executive officers, except in situations where we believe it is appropriate to assist an individual in the performance of his or her duties, to make our executive officers more efficient and effective, and for recruitment and retention purposes. During 2017, none of the NEOs received perquisites or other personal benefits that were, in the aggregate, valued at $10,000 or more. In the future, we may provide perquisites or other personal benefits to our executive officers where we believe it serves a sound business purpose. We do not expect that any future perquisites or other personal benefits will be a significant aspect of our executive compensation program. All future practices with respect to perquisites or other personal benefits will be approved and subject to periodic review by the compensation and leadership committee. Further Considerations for Setting Executive Compensation Compensation-Setting Process Role of the Compensation and Leadership Committee The compensation and leadership committee is responsible for establishing our overall compensation philosophy and reviewing and approving our executive compensation program, including the specific compensation of our executive officers (including our NEOs). The compensation and leadership committee has the authority to retain special counsel and other advisors, including compensation consultants, to assist in carrying out its responsibilities to determine the compensation of our executive officers in 2017 and, as noted previously, has retained an executive compensation consultant, Compensia, Inc., as further discussed below. The compensation and leadership committee’s authority, duties, and responsibilities are described in its charter, which is reviewed annually and revised and updated as warranted. The charter is available on our website at http://investor.gopro.com. In determining our overall compensation philosophy and approving the compensation of our executive officers, the compensation and leadership committee is assisted by its compensation consultant, as well as our Chief Executive Officer, our Vice President, People and Places, and our executive compensation staff to formulate recommendations with respect to specific compensation actions. The compensation and leadership committee makes all final decisions regarding compensation for our executive officers, including base salary levels, target annual cash bonus opportunities, actual cash bonus payments, and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards that are earned over a multi-year period. The compensation and leadership committee meets on a regularly-scheduled basis and at other times as needed and periodically reviews compensation matters with the entire board of directors. At the beginning of each year, the compensation and leadership committee reviews our executive compensation program, including any incentive compensation plans and arrangements, to assess whether our compensation elements, actions and decisions (i) are properly coordinated, (ii) are aligned with our vision, mission, values and corporate goals, (iii) provide appropriate short-term and long-term incentives for our executive officers, (iv) achieve their intended purposes, and (v) are competitive with the compensation of executives in comparable positions at the companies with which we compete for 30 executive talent. Following this assessment, the compensation and leadership committee may make any necessary or appropriate modifications to our existing plans and arrangements or adopt new plans or arrangements. The compensation and leadership committee also conducts an annual review of our executive compensation strategy to ensure that it is appropriately aligned with our business strategy and achieving our desired objectives. Further, the compensation and leadership committee reviews market trends and changes in competitive compensation practices, as described below. The factors to be considered by the compensation and leadership committee in determining the compensation of our executive officers, including our NEOs, include: • • • • • • • • the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, and our Vice President, People and Places (except with respect to their own compensation) as described below; our corporate growth and other elements of financial performance; our corporate and individual achievements against one or more short-term and long-term performance objectives; the individual performance of each executive officer against his or her business objectives; a review of the relevant competitive market analysis prepared by its compensation consultant (as described below); the expected future contribution of the individual executive officer; historical compensation decisions we have made regarding our executive officers; and internal pay equity based on the impact on our business and performance. The compensation and leadership committee does not weigh these factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply any formulas in making its decisions. The members of the compensation and leadership committee consider this information in light of their individual experience, knowledge of GoPro, knowledge of each executive officer, knowledge of the competitive market and business judgment in making their decisions regarding executive compensation and our executive compensation program. As part of this process, the compensation and leadership committee evaluates the performance of our Chief Executive Officer each year and makes all decisions regarding his base salary adjustments, target annual cash bonus opportunities, actual cash bonus payments and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards that are earned over a multi-year period. Our Chief Executive Officer is not present during any of the deliberations regarding his compensation. Role of our Chief Executive Officer Our Chief Executive Officer works closely with the compensation and leadership committee in determining the compensation of our other executive officers, including the other NEOs. Our Chief Executive Officer works with the compensation and leadership committee to recommend the structure of the annual bonus plan, to identify and develop corporate and individual performance objectives for the annual bonus plan, and to evaluate actual performance against the selected measures. At the beginning of each year, our Chief Executive Officer reviews the performance of our other executive officers, including the other NEOs, for the previous year, and then shares these evaluations with, and makes recommendations to, the compensation and leadership committee for each element of compensation. Using his evaluation of each executive officer’s performance and taking into consideration historical compensation awards to our executive officers and our corporate performance during the preceding year, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations regarding base salary 31 adjustments, target annual cash bonus opportunities, actual bonus payments, and long-term incentives in the form of equity awards subject to multi-year vesting for each of our executive officers (other than himself) based on our financial and operating results, the individual executive officer’s contribution to these results, and his or her performance toward achieving his or her individual performance goals. The compensation and leadership committee then reviews these recommendations and considers the other factors described above and makes decisions as to the target compensation of each executive officer (other than our Chief Executive Officer), as well as each individual compensation element. While the compensation and leadership committee will consider our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations, as well as the competitive market analysis prepared by its compensation consultant, Compensia, these recommendations and market data serve as only two of several factors that the compensation and leadership committee considers in making its decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers. No executive officer participates in the determination of the amounts or elements of his or her own compensation. Role of Compensation Consultant Pursuant to its charter, the compensation and leadership committee has the authority to engage its own legal counsel and other advisors, including compensation consultants, as determined in its sole discretion, to assist in carrying out its responsibilities. The compensation and leadership committee has the authority to make all determinations regarding the engagement, fees, and services of these advisors, and any such advisor reports directly to the compensation and leadership committee. Accordingly, as noted previously, in 2017, the compensation and leadership committee engaged Compensia to provide information, analysis, and other assistance relating to our executive compensation program on an ongoing basis. The nature and scope of the services provided to the compensation and leadership committee by Compensia in 2017 were as follows: • • • • • • • researched, analyzed and developed a proposed compensation peer group; provided advice with respect to compensation best practices, regulatory developments and market trends for executive officers and members of our board of directors; conducted an analysis of long-term incentive equity practices currently used by our compensation peer group and advised on design of our long-term incentive plans; conducted an analysis of the levels of overall compensation and each element of compensation for our executive officers; conducted an analysis of the levels of overall compensation and each element of compensation for the members of our board of directors; provided design advice on our short-term annual incentive bonus plan; and provided ad hoc advice and support throughout the year. Representatives of Compensia attend meetings of the compensation and leadership committee as requested and communicate with the compensation and leadership committee outside of meetings. Compensia reports to the compensation and leadership committee rather than to management, although Compensia may meet with members of management, including our Chief Executive Officer, our Vice President, People and Places, and members of our executive compensation staff, for purposes of gathering information on proposals that management may make to the compensation and leadership committee. 32 The compensation and leadership committee has assessed the independence of Compensia taking into account, among other things, the various factors as set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1 and the enhanced independence standards and factors set forth in the applicable Nasdaq listing standards and has concluded that its relationship with Compensia and their respective work on behalf of the compensation and leadership committee has not raised any conflict of interest. Compensation Peer Group Given our unique history and business, market competitors and geographical location, the compensation and leadership committee believes that the competitive market for executive talent includes publicly traded technology companies, including Internet-based product and services companies. Accordingly, it develops a compensation peer group to contain a carefully- selected cross-section of public companies using factors described below, with revenues and market capitalizations that are similar to ours and that may also compete in a similar market for executive talent. In November 2016, the compensation and leadership committee directed Compensia to formulate a group of peer companies to be used as a reference for market positioning and for assessing competitive market practices in connection with making 2017 executive compensation decisions. Compensia reviewed the pool of U.S.-based publicly-traded companies, taking into consideration our industry sector, the size of such companies (based on revenues and market capitalization) relative to our size and growth rate, and the following additional factors: • • • • • • • • the comparability of the company’s business model; the comparability of the company’s revenue and market capitalization; the comparability of the company’s primary sales channels, including via the Internet; the company’s consumer products and/or business services focus; the comparability of the company’s operating history; the comparability of the company’s organizational complexities and growth attributes; the stage of the company’s maturity curve (which increases its likelihood of attracting the type of executive talent for whom we compete); and the comparability of the company’s operational performance (for consistency with our strategy and future performance expectations). Following this review, Compensia recommended to the compensation and leadership committee a peer group of 16 information technology and consumer-oriented companies, which the compensation and leadership committee subsequently approved. The following comparable peers from March 2016 were removed: Akamai Technologies, Dealertrack Technologies, F5 Networks, Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat, ServiceNow, Skyworks Solutions, Solera Holdings, Trip Advisor, Twitter, and Workday. The following comparable peers were added in November 2016: Cirrus Logic, Plantronics, Polycom, Shutterfly, Square, Stratasys, Super Micro Computer, and Synaptics. The selected companies had revenues ranging from $681 million to $3.6 billion and market capitalizations ranging from $1.1 billion to $9.2 billion, which were comparable peers at the time of selection. The compensation and leadership committee reviewed the compensation data drawn from the compensation peer group to develop a representation of the “competitive market” specifically tailored to GoPro with respect to current executive compensation levels and related policies and practices. The compensation and leadership committee then evaluated how its contemplated compensation actions and decisions compared to the competitive market. 33 The companies comprising the compensation peer group were as follows: Cirrus Logic Fitbit Garmin IPG Photonics LendingClub Logitech * Acquired in November 2016. Pandora Media Plantronics Polycom Rackspace Hosting* Shutterfly Square Stratasys Super Micro Computer Synaptics Zebra Technologies The compensation and leadership committee does not believe that it is appropriate to make compensation decisions, whether regarding base salaries or short-term or long-term incentive compensation, solely using benchmarking as guidance. The committee, however, does believe that information regarding the compensation practices at our compensation peer group is useful in two respects. First, the compensation and leadership committee recognizes that our compensation policies and practices must be competitive in the marketplace. Second, this information is useful in assessing the reasonableness and appropriateness of individual executive compensation elements and of our overall executive compensation packages. Other Compensation Policies Compensation Recoupment Policy In 2016, we adopted a compensation recoupment policy applicable to cash incentive-based compensation awards paid to our executive officers. In the event of a substantial restatement of financial results filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the policy permits the board, if the board determines appropriate under the circumstances, and the executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional illegal conduct that materially contributed to the restatement, to seek recovery of all or any portion of the incentive awards paid or awarded to an executive officer in excess of the awards that would have been paid or awarded based on the restated financial results. In addition, pursuant to Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as applicable to all public companies, we may be legally required to seek reimbursement from our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer if, as a result of their misconduct, we restate our financial results due to our material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws. Equity Incentive Award Grant Policy It is our policy to avoid the granting of equity awards close in time to the release of material non-public information, and we have adopted a written equity incentive award grant policy to specify the timing of the effectiveness of our equity awards to avoid such timing. This policy provides the following guidelines to be observed by the compensation and leadership committee and our board of directors in administering the grant of equity awards under our equity compensation plans: • • our board of directors has delegated to the compensation and leadership committee the express authority to administer our 2014 Plan, including the authority to grant awards under the 2014 Plan; our board of directors has delegated to the equity management committee (a committee consisting solely of our Chief Executive Officer) the non-exclusive authority to grant equity awards to employees below the level of executive staff vice president where the awards fall within standard guidelines approved by the compensation and leadership committee and subject to a limitation on the number of shares of our common stock that may be granted in any year; 34 • • • if the equity management committee approves equity awards on or before the 15th day of the month, the awards will be granted effective as of the 15th day of that month, and if it approves such equity awards after the 15th of the month, the grant date for these awards will be the approval date; all equity awards granted outside the equity management committee guidelines or to our employees at or above the level of vice president who serve on the Company’s executive staff must be approved by the compensation and leadership committee; and all equity awards to the non-employee members of our board of directors will be granted automatically in accordance with the terms of our Director Compensation Policy. Under our 2014 Plan, the exercise price of any option to purchase shares of our Class A common stock may not be less than the fair market value (based on the market closing price) of our Class A common stock on the date of grant. Stock Ownership Guidelines In 2016, our board of directors adopted a stock ownership policy to better align the interests of our Chief Executive Officer, our President, and our non-employee directors with the interests of our stockholders. Pursuant to our policy, our Chief Executive Officer and our President are required to achieve ownership of our common stock valued at five times their annual base salary. Our non-employee directors are required to achieve ownership of our common stock valued at five times the amount of the annual retainer payable to directors within five years of joining the Board. The ownership levels of our directors and our Chief Executive Officer as of March 31, 2017 are set forth in the beneficial ownership table section below. Derivatives Trading and Hedging and Pledging Policies We have adopted a policy prohibiting our employees, including our executive officers, and members of our board of directors from speculating in our equity securities, including the use of short sales or any equivalent transaction involving our equity securities. In addition, they may not engage in any other hedging or monetization transactions or trading on margin and other similar or related arrangements, with respect to the securities that they hold. Finally, no employee, including an executive officer, or member of our board of directors may acquire, sell, or trade in any interest or position relating to the future price of our equity securities. Rule 10b5-1 Sales Plans From time to time, certain of our directors and executive officers have adopted written plans, known as Rule 10b5-1 plans, in which they have contracted with a broker to buy or sell shares of our common stock on a periodic basis. Under a Rule 10b5-1 plan, a broker executes trades pursuant to parameters established by the director or officer when entering into the plan, without further direction from the director or officer. The director or officer may amend or terminate the plan in some circumstances. The adoption, amendment, termination and certain other actions with respect to Rule 10b5-1 plans must comply with the terms of our Policy on Securities Trades by GoPro, Inc. Personnel and the GoPro, Inc. Requirements for Trading Plans. Frequency of Say-on-Pay Advisory Vote As previously reported, at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders selected, on a non-binding advisory basis, three years as the frequency at which we will hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation to be paid by us to our NEOs. Based on these results, our board of directors has determined that we will conduct future stockholder advisory votes regarding compensation awarded to our NEOs once every three years. This policy will remain in effect until the next stockholder vote on the frequency of stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of NEOs, expected to be held at our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. 35 Tax and Accounting Considerations Deductibility of Executive Compensation Section 162(m) of the Tax Code generally disallows public companies a tax deduction for federal income tax purposes of remuneration in excess of $1 million paid to certain executive officers. While our compensation and leadership committee considers the deductibility of awards as one factor in determining executive compensation, our compensation and leadership committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions, as noted above, and retains the flexibility to award compensation that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if the awards are not deductible by us for tax purposes. Recent changes to Section 162(m) in connection with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act repealed exceptions to the deductibility limit that were previously available for “qualified performance-based compensation,” including stock option grants, effective for taxable years after December 31, 2017. As a result, any compensation paid to certain of our executive officers in excess of $1 million will be non-deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief afforded to compensation payable pursuant to certain binding arrangements in effect on November 2, 2017. We believe that compensation expense incurred in respect of our stock options granted prior to November 2, 2017, and RSUs granted prior to April 1, 2015, will continue to be deductible pursuant to this transition rule. In addition, we believe that compensation expense incurred in respect of the Executive Bonus Plan for 2017 should be deductible under Section 162(m) because such expense is paid based on the achievement of predetermined performance goals established by our compensation and leadership committee pursuant to our stockholder-approved Executive Bonus Plan. Because of uncertainties in the interpretation and implementation of the changes to Section 162(m), however, including the scope of the transition relief, we can offer no assurance of such deductibility. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation The compensation and leadership committee takes accounting considerations into account in designing compensation plans and arrangements for our executive officers and other employees. Chief among these is FASB ASC Topic 718, the standard which governs the accounting treatment of stock-based compensation awards. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires us to recognize in our financial statements all share-based payment awards to employees, including grants of options to purchase shares of our common stock and RSUs that may be settled for shares of our common stock to our executive officers, based on their fair values. FASB ASC Topic 718 also requires us to recognize the compensation cost of our share-based payment awards in our income statement over the period that an employee, including our executive officers, is required to render service in exchange for the award (which, generally, will correspond to the award’s vesting schedule). Compensation-Related Risks Our board of directors is responsible for the oversight of our risk profile, including compensation-related risks. The compensation and leadership committee monitors our compensation policies and practices as applied to our employees to ensure that these policies and practices do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking. In October 2017, our compensation and leadership committee conducted a review of our compensation programs, including our executive compensation program, and, based on this review, determined that the level of risk associated with these programs is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. 36 Business Highlights for 2017 2017 highlights include the following: • We released the cloud-connected HERO6 Black camera, powered by GoPro’s custom-designed GP1 processor. HERO6 offers 4K60 and 1080p240 video and the most advanced video stabilization ever achieved in a GoPro camera. HERO6 launched globally with a 93% channel fill rate at retail. • We released Fusion, GoPro’s 5.2K spherical camera which captures 360-degree perspective. With the GoPro App, Fusion users can share footage as virtual reality content or, using the app’s OverCapture feature, “punch out” a traditional fixed-perspective video or photo from any angle in the spherical shot. Fusion launched at over 1,000 Best Buy stores and B&H Photo, and on GoPro.com. • We introduced GP1, GoPro’s custom-designed processor. The new chip enables twice the video frame rates, improved image quality, dynamic range, low-light performance and improved video stabilization over previous HERO camera generations. GP1 also enables HERO6 to analyze visual scenes and sensor data for improved image quality and automated QuikStories. • We introduced QuikStories, a new feature within the GoPro app that pulls footage from a GoPro to automatically create videos. QuikStories are polished, shareable videos featuring customizable music, filters, and effects. Other financial and operational highlights included the following: • GoPro reduced operating expenses to $548 million in 2017, down 34% year-over-year. Non-GAAP operating expenses were down 33% year-over-year to $476 million. • GoPro strengthened its balance sheet, ending the year with $247 million in cash and marketable securities. • For the fourth straight year, GoPro’s portfolio captured more than 80% of the Action Camera category by unit volume in the United States in 2017, according to The NPD Group’s Retail Tracking Service. • • In Europe, GoPro held 69% and 44% of the Action Camera category by dollar and unit volume, respectively, in 2017, according to GfK. In China and Japan, unit sales grew by 28% and 96%, respectively, year-over-year in 2017, marking two years of consecutive sell-through growth, according to GfK. • GoPro gained more than 4.8 million new social media followers in 2017, growing its total following to 35 million across all platforms, a 16% increase. • GoPro content was viewed ~700 million times on social media platforms in 2017, up more than 25% year- over-year. • The Quik Mobile Video Editing App was installed 38 million times since it launched in 2016. Quik App installs grew 120% year-over-year in 2017. Executive Compensation Decisions for 2017 2017 was a year of evolution for our flagship HERO camera and expansion into virtual reality 360-degree capture. We are proud of the many product achievements described above which reflect our employees’ and executives’ successful focus on delivering the products and services that delight our users, and which we believe will drive camera sales and 37 improve control over our financial results. As previously disclosed, after the launch of our HERO6 Black camera we saw demand for our HERO5 Black camera soften which we responded to with a price reduction late in the fourth quarter that ultimately increased sell-through. In January 2018, we also implemented a company-wide restructuring of our business resulting in a global reduction in force to reduce our employee headcount below 1,000 employees by the end of 2018, from 1,273 employees as of December 2017. We continue to focus on reducing operating expenses as we strive to bring value to our stockholders and customers. Decisions related to base salaries, bonus payouts and equity grants for 2017 reflect our product and service achievements and challenges we experienced in 2017. Base Salary In 2017, the compensation and leadership committee did not increase the base salary of Mr. Woodman as 2016 performance did not warrant a change and his base salary was deemed market competitive. In January 2017, Mr. Prober was promoted from Senior Vice President, Software and Services to Chief Operating Officer and his base salary was increased to $450,000 to align with the market for this position and the accountabilities of his new role. In February 2017, the compensation and leadership committee reviewed both Mr. McGee and Ms. Zezima’s base salaries based on discussions with Compensia regarding the competitive market, as well as performance as evaluated by our Chief Executive Officer. At that time the compensation and leadership committee approved a base salary of $400,000 for Mr. McGee and $375,000 for Ms. Zezima. In October 2017, Ms. Zezima assumed responsibility for our Corporate Development and Business Development functions. After review of external market practices to account for these additional responsibilities and align with market comparables, her salary was increased to $420,000. The base salaries of our NEOs during 2017 are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” below. Annual Cash Bonuses In February 2017, the compensation and leadership committee decided to award cash bonus opportunities to our executive officers, including our NEOs. The compensation and leadership committee used its authority to select performance measures and related target levels applicable to the annual cash bonus opportunities for our executive officers and did so for 2017 (the “2017 Bonus Plan”). Awards under the 2017 Bonus Plan are subject to our Executive Bonus Plan, which was approved by our stockholders in 2015. Under the 2017 Bonus Plan, the performance measures involving our financial results could be determined in accordance with GAAP, or such financial results could consist of non-GAAP financial measures, subject to adjustment by the compensation and leadership committee for one-time items or unbudgeted or unexpected items when determining whether the target levels for the performance measures had been met. Individual performance would be based on a review of each executive officer’s actual performance during the year by our Chief Executive Officer, including any factors that he determined to be relevant and provided to the compensation and leadership committee for its consideration. 38 Target Bonus Opportunities For 2017, the target annual cash bonus opportunities for each of our NEOs under the 2017 Bonus Plan, expressed as a percentage of his or her annual base salary, were as follows: Annual Base Salary ($) 800,000 442,481 394,808 382,616 Target Bonus Opportunity (as a percentage of base salary) (%) 150 75 75 60 Target Bonus Opportunity ($) 1,200,000 331,861 296,106 229,570 Named Executive Officer Nicholas Woodman CJ Prober(1) Brian McGee(2) Sharon Zezima(3) (1) Pro-rated based on salary change in January 2017. (2) Pro-rated based on salary change in February 2017. (3) Pro-rated based on salary changes in February and October 2017. The target annual cash bonus opportunities of our executive officers, including the NEOs, focused on our short-term financial objectives as reflected in our annual operating plan while, at the same time, allowed for recognition of individual contributions toward achievement of those objectives and the successful execution of each executive’s individual roles and responsibilities. Target bonus opportunities differ among NEOs based on market data, position and level. Corporate Performance Objectives For purposes of the 2017 Bonus Plan, the compensation and leadership committee selected revenue, non-GAAP gross margin and non-GAAP bonus plan operating expense as the corporate performance measures. Each of these corporate performance measures was weighted as follows: Corporate Performance Measure 2017 Target Level Revenue Non-GAAP Gross Margin $1.30 billion 37.3% Non-GAAP Bonus Plan Operating Expense $468 million For purposes of the 2017 Bonus Plan, the non-GAAP corporate performance measures were to be calculated as follows: “Non-GAAP gross margin” refers to gross margin, as calculated under GAAP, excluding the impact of stock-based compensation expense and the amortization of acquisition-related costs. “Non-GAAP bonus plan operating expense” refers to operating expense as calculated under GAAP, excluding bonus expense, as well as the impact of stock-based compensation expense, acquisition- related costs and restructuring costs. The compensation and leadership committee believed these performance measures were appropriate for our business because they provided a balance between generating revenue, managing our expenses and ensuring the profitability of our business, all of which the compensation and leadership committee believes most directly influence long-term stockholder 39 value. These metrics are consistent with performance metrics applied in 2016. The compensation and leadership committee established target performance levels for each measure at levels that it believed to be challenging, but attainable, through the successful execution of our annual operating plan. The threshold, target and maximum levels of achievement for each corporate performance measure and their respective payment amounts, with the actual bonus payment with respect to each measure to be determined independently, were as follows: Corporate Performance Measure Revenue Gross Margin (Non-GAAP) Bonus Plan Operating Expense (Non- GAAP) Performance Measure Weight (%) Threshold Performance Level Threshold Performance (% of Target) Threshold Payment (%) Target Performance Level Target Payment (%) Maximum Performance Level Maximum Performance (% of Target) Maximum Payment (%) 40 30 30 1.17 billion Above 90% 35.4% Above 95% 483 million Less than 103% 25 25 25 1.30 billion 37.3% 100 100 1.37 billion Above 105% 39.1% Above 105% 468 million 100 454 million Less than 97% 200 200 200 In the event actual performance results are between the threshold and target, or between target and maximum performance levels, the payment amount would be calculated between each performance level on a linear basis. In 2017, the compensation and leadership committee added a hurdle of 75% of the target revenue to the corporate performance measures of the plan (the “Hurdle”). If the Hurdle was not achieved, then notwithstanding any actual financial results, as measured against the metrics outlined above, no amount would become payable under the 2017 Bonus Plan to any covered employee under Section 162(m) of the Code. If the Hurdle was met, the 2017 Bonus Plan would fund at up to 200% (the maximum payment level) for each participating executive officer. If the Hurdle was achieved and the 2017 Bonus Plan was funded, our compensation and leadership committee could then reduce individual payouts from the respective maximum 200% payment levels based on corporate and individual performance, provided that in no case could final individual payouts following such exercise of negative discretion exceed 130% of the respective executive officer’s total cash bonus opportunity as calculated pursuant to with the above table of corporate financial performance metrics. Individual Performance After the end of the year, our Chief Executive Officer evaluated each executive officer’s individual performance based on his assessment of the officer’s individual results and contributions to our executive team, recommended a total bonus payout based on corporate performance results as calculated under the 2017 Bonus Plan and individual contribution to such corporate performance results, and then submitted these recommendations to the compensation and leadership committee for review and approval. In the case of our Chief Executive Officer, his performance was evaluated and payment was determined by the compensation and leadership committee. Bonus payments under the 2017 Bonus Plan could not exceed 130% of each executive officer’s target annual cash bonus opportunity based on performance versus the corporate financial performance metrics identified above. 2017 Performance Results and Bonus Decisions In February 2018, the compensation and leadership committee determined that, based on actual 2017 performance with respect to each corporate performance measure, weighted and combined payout results were at 52.5% of target bonus opportunities, reflecting achievement of 90% of the revenue target, 89% of the gross margin target and 137% of the operating expense target. Reconciliations of GAAP to the non-GAAP gross margin and non-GAAP bonus plan operating expense corporate performance measures are set forth in Appendix B. 40 Based on its review of our overall corporate performance, and assessment of our Chief Executive Officer’s individual performance in relation to our business results and financial challenges for 2017, the compensation and leadership committee did not feel overall performance goals were met and did not approve a bonus payment for Mr. Woodman. The compensation and leadership committee approved our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation for a bonus payment aligned with our results of 52.5% of target bonus opportunity to Mr. McGee. Both Mr. Prober and Ms. Zezima also received 52.5% of their target bonus under the 2017 Bonus Plan, which aligned with our results (and which was memorialized in their separation agreements executed in 2018). The payouts were as follows: Named Executive Officer Nicholas Woodman CJ Prober(1) Brian McGee(2) Sharon Zezima(3) Target Annual Cash Bonus Opportunity ($) 1,200,000 331,861(1) 296,106(2) 229,570(3) Actual Annual Cash Bonus Payment ($) 0 174,227 155,456 120,524 Percentage of Target Annual Cash Bonus Opportunity 0 52.5 52.5 52.5 (1) Pro-rated based on salary change in January 2017. (2) Pro-rated based on salary change in February 2017. (3) Pro-rated based on salary changes in February and October 2017. The annual cash bonuses paid to our NEOs for 2017 are also set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, under the column “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.” Long-Term Incentive Compensation Equity Awards for Named Executive Officers In 2017, the compensation and leadership committee engaged Compensia to review the various long-term incentive vehicles used by our peers and determined that using a mix of 50% stock options and 50% RSUs would be the best approach for us to attract and retain key talent in our industry and align our executive officers’ interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders. 41 In February 2017, Messrs. Prober and McGee and Ms. Zezima were awarded options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock and RSUs that may be settled in shares of our Class A common stock. These awards were based on the competitive market for their respective roles, contributions in 2016 and expected long-term contributions to GoPro. The compensation and leadership committee did not grant Mr. Woodman an equity award in 2017 based on 2016 performance results and the belief that as our founder and majority stockholder, Mr. Woodman’s interests continue to be well aligned with those of our stockholders. The equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2017 are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table” below. 2018 Compensation for Chief Executive Officer On January 4, 2018, Mr. Woodman, our Chief Executive Officer, and the Company entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company and Mr. Woodman agreed that Mr. Woodman would receive a nominal salary of $1 and no target 2018 cash bonus for the year ending December 31, 2018 (the “Cash Compensation Reduction”). The Waiver Agreement also provided that Mr. Woodman’s salary and target cash bonus would not be increased again without consent of the Company, that Mr. Woodman has no entitlement to or expectation of a reversal of the Cash Compensation Reduction or other gross-up or true-up of or increase in his salary or target bonus, and that Mr. Woodman waives “good reason” under his employment agreement in connection with the Cash Compensation Reduction and the associated adverse effects on the level of Mr. Woodman’s participation in certain of the Company’s benefit plans. Any future material reduction in Mr. Woodman’s base salary or target bonus giving rise to “good reason” under Mr. Woodman’s employment agreement will be determined by reference to Mr. Woodman’s then-current base salary and target bonus following the Cash Compensation Reduction and not by reference to his base salary or target bonus in effect prior to the Cash Compensation Reduction. Severance and Change in Control Arrangements Employment Arrangements We have extended written employment offer letters to each of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and our other NEOs. Each of these arrangements was approved on our behalf by our board of directors or the compensation and leadership committee, as applicable. We believe that these arrangements were appropriate to induce these individuals to forego other employment opportunities or leave their current employer for the uncertainty of a demanding position in a new and unfamiliar organization. In entering into these arrangements, our board of directors or the compensation and leadership committee, as applicable, was aware that it would be necessary to recruit candidates with the requisite experience and skills to manage a growing business in a dynamic and ever-changing environment. Accordingly, it recognized that it would need to develop competitive compensation packages to attract qualified candidates in a highly-competitive labor market. At the same time, our board of directors or the compensation and leadership committee, as applicable, was sensitive to the need to integrate new executive officers into the executive compensation structure that it was seeking to develop, balancing both competitive and internal equity considerations. Each of these employment arrangements provides for “at will” employment and sets forth the initial or ongoing compensation arrangements for the NEO, including an initial or ongoing base salary, a target annual cash bonus opportunity, and, in some instances, a recommendation for an equity award in the form of stock options or RSUs. For a summary of the material terms and conditions of the employment arrangements with each of our NEOs, see “Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements” below. 42 Change in Control and Severance Policy In January 2014, we adopted a change in control and severance policy, with benefits tied to a qualifying termination in the event of a change in control applicable to our executive officers and certain other employees pursuant to which each individual entered into a written agreement governing such situations. We believe that the severance policy serves several objectives. First, it eliminates the need to negotiate separation payments and benefits on a case-by-case basis. Second, it helps assure an executive officer that his or her severance payments and benefits are comparable to those of other executive officers with similar levels of responsibility and tenure. Further, it acts as an incentive for our executive officers to remain employed and focused on their responsibilities during the pendency or negotiation of a change in control transaction, which we believe would help to preserve our value and the potential benefit to be received by our stockholders in the transaction. Finally, the change in control and severance policy is easier for us to administer than individually negotiated severance agreements, as it requires less time and expense in negotiation or execution. To implement this policy, we enter into change in control severance agreements with each of our executive officers, including each of our NEOs. The agreements with our executive officers, including each of our NEOs (other than our Chief Executive Officer) require us to provide certain payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment, which includes a termination of employment without cause or where the NEO resigns with good reason, within three months preceding or 12 months following a change in control of our company. The receipt of these payments and benefits are contingent upon the NEO’s execution, delivery, and non-revocation of a release and waiver of claims satisfactory to us following the separation from service. In addition, for six months following termination of employment, and as a condition to the payments and benefits, the NEO must cooperate with any transition efforts that we request and must not disparage us, or our directors, officers, or employees. We entered into an employment letter with Mr. Woodman in June 2014, the terms of which supersede in their entirety the change in control and severance agreement he executed in January 2014. For descriptions of the change in control severance arrangements with each of our NEOs see “Estimated Payments and Benefits as of December 31, 2017” below. Arrangements with our Named Executive Officers Arrangements with Mr. Woodman Under his employment letter dated June 2, 2014, Mr. Woodman is eligible to receive severance payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment, including a termination of employment in connection with a change in control of our company. If Mr. Woodman’s employment is terminated by us for any reason other than cause or he resigns for good reason prior to a change in control of GoPro, he will be eligible to receive: • • • a single lump sum payment equal to the sum of 12 months of his then-current base salary and target bonus (assuming a 150% achievement threshold); an additional payment equal to the pro-rata portion of his actual target bonus for the year of his termination of employment; and continuation of benefits under The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”) for 12 months following his termination of employment (or if applicable law requires otherwise, a lump sum payment equal to that amount). 43 If Mr. Woodman’s employment is terminated by us for any reason other than cause or he resigns for good reason within 24 months following a change in control of GoPro, he will be eligible to receive: • • • • a single lump sum payment equal to the sum of 24 months of his then-current base salary and target bonus (assuming a 150% achievement threshold); an additional payment equal to the pro-rata portion of his actual target bonus for the year of his termination of employment; full accelerated vesting of all of the shares of our common stock subject to his then-outstanding and unvested equity awards, if any; and continuation of benefits under COBRA for 18 months following his termination of employment (or if applicable law requires otherwise, a lump sum payment equal to that amount). These payments and benefits are conditioned on Mr. Woodman’s execution and delivery of an irrevocable release to us within the 60 days following his termination of employment. Further, if we undergo a change in control, any payments that would be “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code will be reduced so that Mr. Woodman retains, on an after-tax basis, the greatest amount of these payments. In connection with Mr. Woodman’s Cash Compensation Reduction, we entered into the Waiver Agreement with Mr. Woodman, as discussed above under “2018 Compensation for Chief Executive Officer.” Arrangements with Mr. Prober In May 2014, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. Prober. Among other things, this letter provided that, subject to the approval of the board of directors, Mr. Prober would be granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of our Class B common stock, which would vest as to 25% of the shares subject to the option on the first anniversary of his commencement of employment and thereafter in equal monthly installments over an additional 36 months, subject to his continuous service as of each vesting date. Under his change in control and severance agreement dated June 2, 2014, in the event that we had terminated his employment for any reason other than cause or he had voluntarily resigned his employment for good reason within the three-month period preceding or the 12-month period following a change in control of GoPro, Mr. Prober would have been eligible to receive severance payments and benefits as follows: • • • • 12 months of his then-current base salary; 100% of his target annual bonus; $3,000 per month for 12 months in lieu of employee benefits; and all of the shares of our common stock subject to each then-outstanding and unvested equity award held by Mr. Prober would have accelerated and become vested and exercisable in full immediately prior to his separation from service. Further, if we had undergone a change in control, any payments that would have been “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code would have been reduced so that Mr. Prober would have retained, on an after-tax basis, the greatest amount of these payments. 44 In connection with the restructuring, Mr. Prober’s role as Chief Operating Officer ceased on January 5, 2018. He continued to receive his base salary, employee benefits and continued vesting on his equity awards through his termination date of February 16, 2018. In connection with his departure, Mr. Prober received the following payments and benefits under the terms of his Separation Agreement: • • 60 days’ pay in lieu of notice, pursuant to the California WARN Act; Lump sum payment equal to 10 months’ base salary, less applicable state and federal payroll deductions; • Payout of cash bonus pursuant to the 2017 Bonus Plan at eligible target based on actual attainment of corporate results; • Continuation of benefits under COBRA for 12 months following his termination date; and • Accelerated vesting of all RSUs that would have vested had Mr. Prober remained employed with us through February 16, 2019. Arrangements with Mr. McGee In September 2015, we entered into an employment offer letter with Mr. McGee. Among other things, this letter provided that, subject to the approval of the board of directors, Mr. McGee would be granted an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our Class A common stock, which would vest as to 25% of the shares subject to the option on the first anniversary of his commencement of employment and thereafter in equal monthly installments over an additional 36 months, subject to his continuous service as of each vesting date. The letter also provided subject to the approval of the board of directors, a grant of 15,000 RSUs to vest in four equal annual installments of 25%, each measured from the date of grant, subject to his continuous service as of each vesting date. Under his change in control and severance agreement dated September 28, 2015, in the event that we terminate his employment for any reason other than cause or he voluntarily resigns his employment for good reason within the three- month period preceding or the 12-month period following a change in control of GoPro, Mr. McGee is eligible to receive severance payments and benefits as follows: • • • • 12 months of his then-current base salary; 100% of his target annual bonus; $3,000 per month for 12 months in lieu of employee benefits; and all of the shares of our common stock subject to each then-outstanding and unvested equity award held by Mr. McGee will accelerate and become vested and exercisable in full immediately prior to his separation from service. Further, if we undergo a change in control, any payments that would be “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code will be reduced so that Mr. McGee retains, on an after-tax basis, the greatest amount of these payments. Arrangements with Ms. Zezima In August 2013, we entered into an employment offer letter with Ms. Zezima. Among other things, this letter provided that, subject to the approval of the board of directors, Ms. Zezima would be granted an option to purchase 75,000 shares of our Class B common stock, which would vest as to 25% of the shares subject to the option on the first anniversary of her commencement of employment and thereafter in equal monthly installments over 36 months thereafter, subject to her continuous employment as of each vesting date. 45 Under her change in control and severance agreement dated January 13, 2014, in the event that we had terminated her employment for any reason other than cause or she voluntarily resigned her employment for good reason within the three- month period preceding or the 12-month period following a change in control of GoPro, Ms. Zezima would have been eligible to receive severance payments and benefits as follows: • • • • 12 months of her then-current base salary; 100% of her target annual bonus or, if greater, her most recent actual annual bonus; $3,000 per month for 12 months in lieu of employee benefits; and all of the shares of our common stock subject to each then-outstanding and unvested equity award held by Ms. Zezima would have accelerated and become vested and exercisable in full immediately prior to her separation from service. Further, if we had undergone a change in control, any payments that would have been “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code would have been reduced so that Ms. Zezima would have retained, on an after-tax basis, the greatest amount of these payments. Sharon Zezima tendered her resignation as our Senior Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary on January 2, 2018, to be effective on the transition date of March 30, 2018. As compensation for serving through March 30, 2018, in addition to continuing to receive her current base salary, bonus payout pursuant to the 2017 Bonus Plan, employee benefits, and continued vesting on her equity awards through her termination date, she received the following under the terms of her Transition Incentive Agreement: • A lump sum transition bonus payment equal to $140,000, less applicable state and federal payroll deductions; • Continuation of benefits under COBRA for four months following her termination date; • Accelerated vesting of all RSUs that would have vested had Ms. Zezima remained employed with us through September 30, 2018; and • Ms. Zezima’s cash bonus payment pursuant to the 2017 Bonus Plan pro-rated for the year ended December 31, 2018, based on Ms. Zezima’s current target percentage and actual Company performance in 2018, as determined by the compensation and leadership committee in the first quarter of 2019. 46 Summary Compensation Table The following table provides information concerning compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each of our NEOs for 2017, 2016 and 2015. Name and Principal Position Nicholas Woodman, Chief Executive Officer CJ Prober,(7) former Chief Operating Officer Brian McGee, Chief Financial Officer Sharon Zezima, former Senior Vice President, Corporate/Business Development, General Counsel and Secretary Stock Awards ($)(1) Option Awards ($)(2) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3) All Other Compensation ($) Year 2017 2016 2015 2017 2017 2016 2017 Salary ($) 800,000 800,000 805,128 — — — — — — 442,481 944,000 937,774 394,808 472,000 468,885 345,769 428,400 417,352 382,616 330,400 328,219 — 300,000 — 174,227 155,456 143,291 120,524 147(4) 113,255(5) 89(6) 11,977(8) 147(9) 3,508(10) 10,947(11) Total ($) 800,147 1,213,255 805,217 2,510,459 1,491,296 1,338,320 1,172,706 2016 334,616 309,829 301,872 114,797 45,205(12) 1,106,319 2015 290,494 298,238 296,662 43,000 11,189(13) 939,583 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date value of RSUs made to the NEO in 2017, 2016 and 2015 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The grant date fair value for RSUs is measured based on the closing fair market value of GoPro’s common stock on the date of grant. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these RSUs and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the NEO. The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date value of option awards made to the NEO in 2017, 2016 and 2015 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock options reported in the Option Awards column are set forth in Note 7 to the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these options and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the NEO. The amounts reported in this column represent the NEO’s annual cash bonus awards, which for 2017, 2016 and 2015, we awarded under the 2017 Bonus Plan, the 2016 Bonus Plan, and the 2015 Bonus Plan, respectively, based on the compensation and leadership committee’s determination of individual and overall company performance. The $147 reported represents the value of corporate merchandise. The amount reported represents $138 as the value of corporate merchandise and a $113,117 one-time payout of vacation time due to adoption of all our employee discretionary time off program. The $89 reported represents the value of corporate merchandise. (7) Mr. Prober was promoted to Chief Operating Officer effective January 25, 2017. (8) The amount reported includes $10,800 in matching 401(k) account contributions, $147 as the value of corporate merchandise, $1,000 in charitable contribution matching, and $30 in gym benefits. (9) The $147 reported represents the value of corporate merchandise. (10) The amount reported represents $138 as the value of corporate merchandise and a $3,370 one-time payout of vacation time due to adoption of all our employee discretionary time off program. (11) The amount reported includes $10,800 in matching 401(k) account contributions, and $147 as the value of corporate merchandise. (12) The amount reported represents $138 as the value of corporate merchandise, a $33,967 one-time payout of vacation time due to adoption of all our employee discretionary time off program, $10,600 matching 401(k) and $500 in charitable contribution matching. (13) The amount reported includes $10,600 in matching 401(k) account contributions, $89 as the value of corporate merchandise and $500 in charitable contribution matching. 47 Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table provides information concerning each grant of an award made in 2017 for each of our NEOs under any plan. This information supplements the information about these awards set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. All options and stock awards represented in the table below were granted pursuant to our 2014 Plan, unless otherwise noted. Name Nicholas Woodman CJ Prober(4) Award Type Cash Cash Grant Date N/A N/A — — RSU 2/15/2017 1/25/2017 Option 2/15/2017 1/25/2017 Brian McGee(7) Cash N/A RSU 2/15/2017 Option 2/15/2017 Sharon Zezima(10) Cash N/A RSU 2/15/2017 Option 2/15/2017 — — — — — — Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards Approval Date Threshold ($)(1) Target ($) Maximum ($)(2) All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares or Stock or Units All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options Exercise Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(3) 300,000 1,200,000 2,400,000 82,965 331,861 663,721 — — — — — — 74,026 296,106 592,212 — — — — — — 57,393 229,570 459,141 — — — — — — — — 100,000(5) — — 50,000(8) — — 35,000(11) — — — 227,273(6) — — 113,636(9) — — — 79,545(12) — — — 9.44 — — 9.44 — — 9.44 — — 944,000 937,774 — 472,000 468,885 — 330,400 328,219 (1) As set forth under the 2017 Bonus Plan, the threshold amount represents corporate financial performance of (i) 90% achievement of the revenue target, (ii) 95% achievement of the gross margin (non-GAAP) target, and (iii) 103% achievement of operating expense target, resulting in a payment of 25% of target bonus opportunity. (2) As set forth under the 2017 Bonus Plan, the maximum amount represents corporate financial performance (i) above 105% achievement of the revenue target, (ii) above 105% achievement of the gross margin (non-GAAP) target, and (iii) below 97% achievement of operating expense target, resulting in a maximum payment of 200% of target bonus opportunity. (3) The amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date value of each award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value of the stock reported in the Option Awards column are set forth in Note 7 to the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report. Note that the amounts reported in this column reflect the accounting cost for these awards and do not correspond to the actual economic value that may be received by the NEO. (4) Mr. Prober’s estimated future payouts under the 2017 Bonus Plan are prorated reflecting his base salary change in January 2017. (5) One-sixth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/6th were to vest semi-annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. Under his Separation Agreement, a total of 33,333 RSUs from this award were accelerated and released to Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. All remaining unvested RSUs from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (6) One-sixth of the total Options granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/36th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. No adjustments were made to this Option award under his Separation Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end May 16, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (7) Mr. McGee’s estimated future payouts under the 2017 Bonus Plan are prorated reflecting his base salary change in February 2017. (8) One-sixth of the total RSUs granted will vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/6th will vest semi-annually thereafter until the units are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested RSUs may accelerate and become vested subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (9) One-sixth of the total Options granted will vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/36th will vest monthly thereafter until the options are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested Options may accelerate and become vested and exercisable subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (10) Ms. Zezima’s estimated future payouts under the 2017 Bonus Plan are prorated reflecting her base salary changes in February and October 2017. (11) One-sixth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/6th were to vest semi-annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. Under her Transition Incentive Agreement, a total of 5,834 RSUs from this award were accelerated and released to Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. All remaining unvested RSUs from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. (12) One-sixth of the total Options granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/36th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this Option award under the Transition Incentive Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end June 30, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. 48 Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2017 The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each NEO as of December 31, 2017. Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Options Unexercisable — 84,375(2) 9,122(4) 30,303(6) 18,845(6) 63,137(8) 16,875(9) 39,783(11) 31,568(13) 54,656(15) 9,830(17) 30,303(19) 22,098(21) — 18,750(2) 3,757(4) 35,813(6) 22,273(6) 164,136(8) 13,125(9) 47,017(11) 82,068(13) — 4,049(17) 35,813(19) 57,447(21) Option Exercise Price ($)(1) — 18.40 44.48 10.17 13.36 Option Expiration Date — 6/2/2024 2/8/2025 2/10/2026 3/3/2026 9.44 2/14/2027 28.54 10.71 10/14/2025 2/2/2026 9.44 2/14/2027 15.59 44.48 10.17 9/15/2023 2/8/2025 2/10/2026 9.44 2/14/2027 Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) — 3,111(3) 22,849(5) 14,280(5) 83,334(7) — 7,500(10) 30,000(12) 41,667(14) 3,353(16) 22,849(18) 29,167(20) — — 23,550 172,967 108,100 630,838 — 56,775 227,100 315,419 25,382 172,967 220,794 — Name Nicholas Woodman CJ Prober Brian McGee Sharon Zezima (1) Represents the fair market value of a share of our common stock. For options granted pre-IPO, market value was determined by our board of directors on the grant date. For options granted after our IPO, market value is the closing price of our stock on date of grant. See the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Stock-based compensation” included in our Annual Report for a discussion of the valuation of our common stock. (2) One-fourth of the total Options granted were to vest on June 2, 2015, and an additional 1/48th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. No adjustments were made to this Option award under his Separation Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end May 16, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (3) One-fourth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on February 15, 2016 and an additional 1/4th were to vest annually thereafter, until the units were fully vested subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. Under his Separation Agreement, a total of 1,556 RSUs from this award were accelerated and released to Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (4) One-fourth of the total Options granted were to vest on February 9, 2016, and an additional 1/48th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. No adjustments were made to this Option award under his Separation Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period which will end May 16, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (5) One-fourth of the total RSUs granted in each award were to vest on February 15, 2017, and an additional 1/4th in each award were to vest annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. Under his Separation Agreement, a total of 7,616 RSUs and 4,760 RSUs, respectively, from these awards were accelerated and released to Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. All remaining unvested RSUs from these awards were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (6) One-fourth of the total Options granted in each award were to vest on February 11, 2017, and an additional 1/48th in each award were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. No adjustments were made to either of these Option awards under his Separation Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end May 16, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (7) One-sixth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/6th were to vest semi-annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. Under his Separation Agreement, a total of 33,333 RSUs from this award were accelerated and released to Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. All remaining unvested RSUs from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (8) One-sixth of the total Options granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/36th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Mr. Prober’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Prober’s role ceased in connection with the restructuring. No adjustments were made to this Option award under his Separation Agreement. Vested outstanding stock 49 options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end May 16, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Mr. Prober on his termination date of February 16, 2018. (9) One-fourth of the total Options granted will vest on September 28, 2016, and an additional 1/48th will vest monthly thereafter until the options are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested Options may accelerate and become vested and exercisable subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (10) One-fourth of the total RSUs granted will vest on October 15, 2016, and an additional 1/4th will vest annually thereafter until the units are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested RSUs may accelerate and become vested subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (11) One-fourth of the total Options granted will vest on February 3, 2017, and an additional 1/48th will vest monthly thereafter until the options are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested Options may accelerate and become vested and exercisable subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (12) One-fourth of the total RSUs granted will vest on February 15, 2017, and an additional 1/4th will vest annually thereafter until the units are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested RSUs may accelerate and become vested subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (13) One-sixth of the total Options granted will vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/36th will vest monthly thereafter until the options are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested Options may accelerate and become vested and exercisable subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (14) One-sixth of the total RSUs granted will vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/6th will vest semi-annually thereafter until the units are fully vested, subject to Mr. McGee’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. Unvested RSUs may accelerate and become vested subject to the terms of the change in control and severance agreement between Mr. McGee and the Company. (15) One-fourth of the total Options granted were to vest on July 29, 2014, and an additional 1/48th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this Option award under her Transition Incentive Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end June 30, 2018. (16) One-fourth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on February 15, 2016, and an additional 1/4th were vest annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this RSU award under her Transition Incentive Agreement. All remaining unvested RSUs from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. (17) One-fourth of the total Options granted were to vest on February 9, 2016, and an additional 1/48th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this Option award under her Transition Incentive Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end June 30, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. (18) One-fourth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on February 15, 2017, and an additional 1/4th were to vest annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this RSU award under her Transition Incentive Agreement. All remaining unvested RSUs from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. (19) One-fourth of the total Options granted were to vest on February 11, 2017, and an additional 1/48th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this Option award under her Transition Incentive Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end June 30, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. (20) One-sixth of the total RSUs granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/6th were to vest semi-annually thereafter until the units were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. Under her Transition Incentive Agreement, a total of 5,834 RSUs from this award were accelerated and released to Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. All remaining unvested RSUs from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. (21) One-sixth of the total Options granted were to vest on August 15, 2017, and an additional 1/36th were to vest monthly thereafter until the options were fully vested, subject to Ms. Zezima’s continued service to the Company through each vesting date. On January 2, 2018, Ms. Zezima resigned and entered into a Transition Incentive Agreement related to her separation from the Company. No adjustments were made to this Option award under her Transition Incentive Agreement. Vested outstanding stock options remain exercisable through our standard, post-termination 3-month grace period, which will end June 30, 2018. All remaining unvested Options from this award were forfeited by Ms. Zezima on her termination date of March 30, 2018. 50 Option Exercises and Stock Vested The following table provides information concerning the exercise of options and the vesting of RSUs in 2017 for each NEO as of December 31, 2017. Value realized on option exercise is calculated by subtracting the aggregate exercise price of the options exercised from the aggregate market value of the shares of common stock acquired on the date of exercise. Value realized on vesting of RSUs is based on the fair market value of our common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares vested and does not necessarily reflect proceeds received by the NEO. Name Nicholas Woodman CJ Prober Brian McGee Sharon Zezima Option Awards Stock Awards Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise Value Realized on Exercise ($) Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting Value Realized on Vesting ($) — — — — — — — — 500,000 30,598 22,083 15,125 4,397,500 296,178 210,780 145,347 Estimated Payments and Benefits as of December 31, 2017 The following table sets forth the estimated payments and benefits that would be received by each of the NEOs upon a change in control of GoPro, upon a termination of employment without cause or following a resignation for good reason, or in the event of a termination of employment without cause or following a resignation for good reason in connection with a change in control in GoPro. This table reflects amounts payable to each NEO assuming that his or her employment was terminated on December 31, 2017, and the change in control of GoPro also occurred on that date. The closing market price per share of our common stock on December 29, 2017, was $7.57. Change In Control Termination of Employment No Change in Control Termination of Employment Change in Control Named Executive Officer Nicholas Woodman CJ Prober(2) Brian McGee Sharon Zezima(3) Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($)(1) Excise Tax Payment ($) Total ($) Severance Payment ($) Medical Benefits Continuation ($) Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($)(1) Total ($) Severance Payment ($) Medical Benefits Continuation ($) Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($)(1) Excise Tax Payment ($) Total ($) — — — — — — — — — — — — 3,200,000 36,000 — 3,236,000 5,200,000 54,000 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 787,500 36,000 935,455 700,000 36,000 599,294 672,000 36,000 419,143 — 5,254,000 — 1,758,955 — 1,335,294 — 1,127,143 (1) The value of the accelerated vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards has been calculated based on the closing market price of GoPro common stock on Nasdaq on December 29, 2017, which was $7.57 per share, less, if applicable, the exercise price of each outstanding and unvested stock option. (2) Mr. Prober’s employment terminated in connection with the restructuring on February 16, 2018. The terms of his Separation Agreement are outlined above in the Severance and Change in Control Arrangements section. (3) Ms. Zezima resigned and terminated employment on March 30, 2018. The terms of her Transition Incentive Agreement are outlined above in the Severance and Change in Control Arrangements section. CEO Pay Ratio Our ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (excluding our Chief Executive Officer) for 2017 is approximately 5.3 to 1. We believe this ratio, which was calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, to be a reasonable estimate, based upon the assumptions and adjustments described below. As disclosed in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table, the annual total compensation for 2017 for our Chief Executive Officer was $800,147. The median of the annual total compensation for 2017 for all our employees (excluding our Chief Executive Officer) was $151,857. In identifying the 51 median employee under Item 402(u), reporting companies are permitted to use reasonable estimates, assumptions and methodologies based on their own facts and circumstances. As a result, the disclosure regarding the compensation of our median employee may not be directly comparable to similar disclosure by other reporting companies. Calculation Methodology We identified the employee with compensation at the median of the compensation of all of our employees (the “median employee”) by considering our employee population as of December 31, 2017 (the “employee population determination date”). We considered all individuals (excluding our Chief Executive Officer) who were employed by us on a worldwide basis (including our consolidated subsidiaries) on the employee population determination date, whether employed on a full-time, part-time, seasonal or temporary basis, including employees on a partial-year leave of absence. The compensation measure used for purposes of identifying the median employee was total direct compensation, which consisted of earned salary or wages, earned cash incentives (including commissions and bonuses), and the grant date fair value of equity incentive awards granted in 2017, calculated in each case using the same methodology we use for calculating the compensation, including the value of equity awards, of our NEOs to be reported in our Summary Compensation Table. In the case of foreign employees, total direct compensation also included “13th month pay” and any holiday allowance that was statutorily required to be paid as we view such compensation to be akin to earned salary or wages, and all amounts were converted to U.S. dollars using exchange rates in effect on the employee population determination date, without making any cost of living adjustments for employees outside of the United States. We also annualized the cash compensation of any permanent employees that were not employed by us for all of 2017. We believe our methodology represents a consistently applied compensation measure that strikes a balance in terms of administrative burden while consistently treating the primary compensation components for our worldwide employee population. After identifying the initial median employee, in calculating the annual total compensation of such employee in accordance with SEC rules, we determined that such employee’s annual total compensation for 2017 had anomalous compensation characteristics in that the employee received a new hire equity grant in 2017, which is not standard or representative of the compensation typically paid to our employees on an annual basis, and inclusion of such grant would have a significant impact on the pay ratio. As a result, we substituted this employee for another employee, who had substantially similar compensation based on total direct compensation, which did not include any new hire grant. We calculated the annual compensation for the final median employee using the same methodology we use to calculate the amount reported for our NEOs in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. 52 REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE This report of the compensation and leadership committee is required by the SEC and, in accordance with the SEC’s rules, will not be deemed to be part of or incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, and will not otherwise be deemed “soliciting material” or “filed” under either the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Our compensation and leadership committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the compensation and leadership committee recommended to our board of directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Submitted by the Compensation and Leadership Committee Peter Gotcher, Chair Susan Lyne Frederic Welts Lauren Zalaznick 53 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION The following table presents information as of December 31, 2017, with respect to compensation plans under which shares of our Class A common stock or Class B common stock may be issued. Plan Category Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights(1) Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Right ($)(2) (a) (b) Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 19,279,215 11.163856 Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders —(4) — Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities) Reflected in Column(a)) (c) 16,996,387(3) — Total 19,279,215 11.163856 16,996,387 (1) (2) (3) Includes our 2010 Plan, grants assumed under the Sparrow Acquisition Plan (“SAP Plan”), and our 2014 Plan. Excludes purchase rights accruing under our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The weighted-average exercise price does not reflect the shares that will be issued in connection with the settlement of RSUs, because RSUs have no exercise price. There are no shares of common stock available for issuance under our 2010 Plan or under the SAP Plan, but those plans will continue to govern the terms of options or awards granted thereunder. Any shares of Class B common stock that are subject to outstanding awards under the 2010 Plan that are issuable upon the exercise of stock options that expire or become unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full will generally be available for future grant and issuance as shares of Class A common stock under our 2014 Plan. In addition, the number of shares reserved for issuance under our 2014 Plan increased automatically by 4,963,754 on January 1, 2018 and will increase automatically on the first day of January of each of 2019 through 2024 by the number of shares equal to 3% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock (which includes outstanding shares of our Class A common stock, outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, outstanding stock options and outstanding RSUs) as of the immediately preceding December 31 or a lower number approved by our board of directors. There are 6,074,199 shares of Class A common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The number of shares reserved for issuance under our 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan increased automatically by 1,654,584 on January 1, 2018 and will increase automatically on the first day of January of each year during the term of the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan by the number of shares equal to 1% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock (which includes outstanding shares of our Class A common stock, outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, outstanding stock options and outstanding RSUs) as of the immediately preceding December 31 or a lower number approved by our board of directors. (4) Excludes outstanding 12,844 RSUs that were assumed as part of an acquisition. In connection with the acquisition, GoPro has only assumed the outstanding RSUs, but not the plan itself, and therefore, no further awards may be granted under the acquired-company plan. 54 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS In addition to the executive officer and director compensation arrangements discussed above under “Executive Compensation” and “Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors – Director Compensation,” respectively, since January 1, 2017, we were a party to the following transactions in which: • we have been or are to be a participant; • • the amount involved exceeds $120,000; and any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Offer Letters and Change In Control Agreements We have entered into offer letters and change in control severance agreements with our executive officers that, among other things, provide for severance and change in control benefits. See “Executive Compensation – Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements” for information about these agreements. Indemnification of Directors We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. These indemnification agreements and our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide for indemnification of each of our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Other Transactions The Company incurs costs for Company-related chartered aircraft fees for the use of Mr. Woodman’s private plane. The Company recorded expense of $0.1 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company had no accounts payable associated with these aircraft fees. In 2017, the Company obtained services from SurveyMonkey whose CEO, Alexander Lurie, is a member of the Company’s board of directors. Because the Company prepaid the expense in 2016 (a total of $210,000, including services from 2016 through 2017), the Company recorded expense of $0.00 in 2017. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no accounts payable associated with SurveyMonkey. Adam Dornbusch, who was employed by the Company from June 17, 2013 to December 2, 2016, married the daughter of our former board member Michael Marks in July 2015. In 2017, Mr. Dornbusch received total compensation of $140,060, which comprises a severance payment related to his separation from the Company. Mr. Marks did not have any financial interest in the compensation of Mr. Dornbusch as a GoPro employee. As discussed above under 2018 Compensation for Chief Executive Officer, on January 4, 2018, Mr. Woodman and the Company entered into the Waiver Agreement, pursuant to which the Company and Mr. Woodman agreed that Mr. Woodman would receive a nominal salary of $1 and no target 2018 cash bonus for the year ending December 31, 2018. 55 Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Related Party Transactions policy requires that any transaction with a related party that must be reported under applicable rules of the SEC (other than compensation-related matters), must be reviewed and approved or ratified by our audit committee (other than transactions that are subject to review by our board of directors as a whole or any other committee of our board of directors). In approving or rejecting any such proposal, our audit committee will consider the relevant and available facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transactions, the material facts of the proposed transaction, including the proposed aggregate value of such transaction and whether the proposed transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances. 56 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE The information contained in the following report of our audit committee is not considered to be “soliciting material,” “filed” or incorporated by reference in any past or future filing by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933 unless and only to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference. The audit committee of our board of directors is composed of three independent outside directors. The audit committee has reviewed and discussed with our management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The audit committee has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed pursuant to AS No. 1301 “Communications with Audit Committees” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The audit committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent independence, and has discussed with accountant’s communications with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from GoPro. the audit committee concerning Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Submitted by the Audit Committee Kenneth Goldman, Chair Peter Gotcher Lauren Zalaznick 57 Stockholder Proposals to be Presented at Next Annual Meeting ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Our bylaws provide that, for stockholder nominations to the board or other proposals to be considered at an annual meeting, the stockholder must give timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary at GoPro, Inc., 3000 Clearview Way, San Mateo, California 94402, Attn: Secretary. To be timely for the 2019 Annual Stockholder’s Meeting, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received by our Secretary at our principal executive offices not earlier than 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on February 21, 2019 and not later than 5:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) on March 23, 2019. A stockholder’s notice to the Secretary must set forth each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting and the information required by our bylaws. Stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and intended to be presented at our 2019 Annual Meeting must be received by the Secretary no later than December 27, 2018 in order to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials for that annual meeting. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and any persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from the directors and executive officers, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were timely met in 2017. Available Information GoPro will mail without charge, upon written request, a copy of GoPro’s Annual Report, including the financial statements and list of exhibits, and any exhibit specifically requested. Requests should be sent to: GoPro, Inc. 3000 Clearview Way San Mateo, California 94402 Attn: Investor Relations “Householding” — Stockholders Sharing the Same Last Name and Address The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as brokers) to implement a delivery procedure called “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple stockholders who reside at the same address may receive a single copy of our Annual Report and proxy materials, including the Notice of Internet Availability, unless the affected stockholder has provided contrary instructions. This procedure reduces printing costs and postage fees, and helps protect the environment as well. This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are GoPro stockholders will be “householding” our Annual Report and proxy materials, including the Notice of Internet Availability. A single Notice of Internet Availability and, if applicable, a single set of Annual Report and other proxy materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that it will be “householding” communications to your address, “householding” will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. Stockholders may revoke their consent at any time by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions by calling 1-866-540-7095 or writing to: Broadridge House Holding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. 58 Upon written or oral request, GoPro will promptly deliver a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if applicable, Annual Report and other proxy materials to any stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of any of those documents was delivered. To receive a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability and, if applicable, Annual Report and other proxy materials, you may write GoPro’s Investor Relations department at 3000 Clearview Way, San Mateo, California 94402, Attn: Investor Relations or call (855) GOPROHD or (855) 467-7643. Any stockholders who share the same address and currently receive multiple copies of GoPro’s Notice of Internet Availability or Annual Report and other proxy materials who wish to receive only one copy in the future can contact their bank, broker or other holder of record to request information about householding or GoPro’s Investor Relations department at the address or telephone number listed above. OTHER MATTERS The board of directors does not presently intend to bring any other business before the Annual Meeting and, so far as is known to the board of directors, no matters are to be brought before the Annual Meeting except as specified in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As to any business that may arise and properly come before the Annual Meeting, however, it is intended that proxies, in the form enclosed, will be voted in respect thereof in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting such proxies. 59 [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] APPENDIX A GOPRO, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are important to the success of the Company, and any Parents and Subsidiaries that exist now or in the future, by offering them an opportunity to participate in the Company’s future performance through the grant of Awards. Capitalized terms not defined elsewhere in the text are defined in Section 28. 2. SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN. 2.1. Number of Shares Available. Subject to Sections 2.6 and 21 and any other applicable provisions hereof, the total number of Shares reserved and available for grant and issuance pursuant to this Plan as of the date of adoption of the Plan by the Board, is 13,470,229 plus (i) any reserved shares not issued or subject to outstanding grants under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”) on the Effective Date (as defined below), (ii) shares that are subject to stock options or other awards granted under the Prior Plan that cease to be subject to such stock options or other awards by forfeiture or otherwise after the Effective Date, (iii) shares issued under the Prior Plan before or after the Effective Date pursuant to the exercise of stock options that are, after the Effective Date, forfeited, (iv) shares issued under the Prior Plan that are repurchased by the Company at the original issue price and (v) shares that are subject to stock options or other awards under the Prior Plan that are used to pay the exercise price of an option or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to any award. Provided, however, that shares reserved and available for grant and issuance pursuant to subpart (i) – (v) of this Section 2.1 shall be issuable as Common Stock of the Company regardless of their series or class under the prior plan. 2.2. Lapsed, Returned Awards. Shares subject to Awards, and Shares issued under the Plan under any Award, will again be available for grant and issuance in connection with subsequent Awards under this Plan to the extent such Shares: (a) are subject to issuance upon exercise of an Option or SAR granted under this Plan but which cease to be subject to the Option or SAR for any reason other than exercise of the Option or SAR; (b) are subject to Awards granted under this Plan that are forfeited or are repurchased by the Company at the original issue price; (c) are subject to Awards granted under this Plan that otherwise terminate without such Shares being issued; or (d) are surrendered pursuant to an Exchange Program. To the extent an Award under the Plan is paid out in cash rather than Shares, such cash payment will not result in reducing the number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise price of an Award or withheld to satisfy the tax withholding obligations related to an Award will become available for future grant or sale under the Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, Shares that otherwise become available for grant and issuance because of the provisions of this Section 2.2 shall not include Shares subject to Awards that initially became available because of the substitution clause in Section 21.2 hereof. 2.3. Minimum Share Reserve. At all times the Company shall reserve and keep available a sufficient number of Shares as shall be required to satisfy the requirements of all outstanding Awards granted under this Plan. 2.4. Automatic Share Reserve Increase. The number of Shares available for grant and issuance under the Plan shall be automatically increased January 1 of each of the calendar years 2015 through 2024, by the lesser of (i) three percent (3%) of the number of Shares, Share equivalents, Class B Common Stock shares, and Class B Common Stock equivalents outstanding on each December 31 immediately prior to the date of increase or (ii) such number of Shares determined by the Board. 2.5. Limitations. No more than 134,702,290 Shares shall be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs. 2.6. Adjustment of Shares. If the number of outstanding Shares is changed by a stock dividend, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, subdivision, combination, reclassification or similar change in the capital structure of the Company, without consideration, then (a) the number of Shares reserved for issuance and future grant under the Plan set forth in Section 2.1, including shares reserved under sub-clauses (i)-(v) of Section 2.1, (b) the Exercise Prices of and number of Shares subject to outstanding Options and SARs, (c) the number of Shares subject to other outstanding Awards, (d) the maximum number of shares that may be issued as ISOs set forth in Section 2.5, and (e) the maximum number of Shares that A- 1 may be issued to an individual or to a new Employee in any one calendar year set forth in Section 3 or to a Non-Employee Director in Section 12 shall be proportionately adjusted, subject to any required action by the Board or the stockholders of the Company and in compliance with applicable securities laws; provided that fractions of a Share will not be issued. 3. ELIGIBILITY. ISOs may be granted only to eligible Employees. All other Awards may be granted to Employees, Consultants, Directors and Non-Employee Directors; provided such Consultants, Directors and Non-Employee Directors render bona fide services not in connection with the offer and sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction. No Participant will be eligible to be granted more than Three Million (3,000,000) Shares in any calendar year under this Plan pursuant to the grant of Awards except that new Employees (including new Employees who are also officers and directors of the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate) are eligible to be granted up to a maximum of Six Million (6,000,000) Shares in the calendar year in which they commence their employment. 4. ADMINISTRATION. 4.1. Committee Composition; Authority. This Plan will be administered by the Committee or by the Board acting as the Committee. Subject to the general purposes, terms and conditions of this Plan, and to the direction of the Board, the Committee will have full power to implement and carry out this Plan, except, however, the Board shall establish the terms for the grant of an Award to Non-Employee Directors. The Committee will have the authority to: (a) construe and interpret this Plan, any Award Agreement and any other agreement or document executed pursuant to this Plan; (b) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan or any Award; (c) select persons to receive Awards; (d) determine the form and terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of any Award granted hereunder. Such terms and conditions include, but are not limited to, the exercise price, the time or times when Awards may vest and be exercised (which may be based on performance criteria) or settled, any vesting acceleration or waiver of forfeiture restrictions, the method to satisfy tax withholding obligations or any other tax liability legally due, and any restriction or limitation regarding any Award or the Shares relating thereto, based in each case on such factors as the Committee will determine; (e) (f) determine the number of Shares or other consideration subject to Awards; determine the Fair Market Value and interpret the applicable provisions of this Plan and the definition of Fair Market Value in connection with circumstances that impact the Fair Market Value, if necessary; (g) determine whether Awards will be granted singly, in combination with, in tandem with, in replacement of, or as alternatives to, other Awards under this Plan or any other incentive or compensation plan of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company; (h) grant waivers of Plan or Award conditions; (i) (j) any Award Agreement; determine the vesting, exercisability and payment of Awards; correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in this Plan, any Award or (k) determine whether an Award has been earned; (l) determine the terms and conditions of any, and to institute any Exchange Program; (m) reduce or waive any criteria with respect to Performance Factors; A- 2 (n) adjust Performance Factors to take into account changes in law and accounting or tax rules as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate to reflect the impact of extraordinary or unusual items, events or circumstances to avoid windfalls or hardships provided that such adjustments are consistent with the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code with respect to persons whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; (o) adopt terms and conditions, rules and/or procedures (including the adoption of any subplan under this Plan) relating to the operation and administration of the Plan to accommodate requirements of local law and procedures outside of the United States; (p) make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan; and delegate any of the foregoing to a subcommittee consisting of one or more executive officers pursuant to a specific delegation as permitted by applicable law, including Section 157(c) of the Delaware General Corporation Law. (q) 4.2. Committee Interpretation and Discretion. Any determination made by the Committee with respect to any Award shall be made in its sole discretion at the time of grant of the Award or, unless in contravention of any express term of the Plan or Award, at any later time, and such determination shall be final and binding on the Company and all persons having an interest in any Award under the Plan. Any dispute regarding the interpretation of the Plan or any Award Agreement shall be submitted by the Participant or Company to the Committee for review. The resolution of such a dispute by the Committee shall be final and binding on the Company and the Participant. The Committee may delegate to one or more executive officers the authority to review and resolve disputes with respect to Awards held by Participants who are not Insiders, and such resolution shall be final and binding on the Company and the Participant. 4.3. Section 162(m) of the Code and Section 16 of the Exchange Act. When necessary or desirable for an Award to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code the Committee shall include at least two persons who are “outside directors” (as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code) and at least two (or a majority if more than two then serve on the Committee) such “outside directors” shall approve the grant of such Award and timely determine (as applicable) the Performance Period and any Performance Factors upon which vesting or settlement of any portion of such Award is to be subject. When required by Section 162(m) of the Code, prior to settlement of any such Award at least two (or a majority if more than two then serve on the Committee) such “outside directors” then serving on the Committee shall determine and certify in writing the extent to which such Performance Factors have been timely achieved and the extent to which the Shares subject to such Award have thereby been earned. Awards granted to Participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act must be approved by two or more “non-employee directors” (as defined in the regulations promulgated under Section 16 of the Exchange Act). With respect to Participants whose compensation is subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, and provided that such adjustments are consistent with the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may adjust the performance goals to account for changes in law and accounting and to make such adjustments as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate to reflect the impact of extraordinary or unusual items, events or circumstances to avoid windfalls or hardships, including without limitation (i) restructurings, discontinued operations, extraordinary items, and other unusual or non-recurring charges, (ii) an event either not directly related to the operations of the Company or not within the reasonable control of the Company’s management, or (iii) a change in accounting standards required by generally accepted accounting principles. 4.4. Documentation. The Award Agreement for a given Award, the Plan and any other documents may be delivered to, and accepted by, a Participant or any other person in any manner (including electronic distribution or posting) that meets applicable legal requirements. 4.5. Foreign Award Recipients. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws and practices in other countries in which the Company and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates operate or have employees or other individuals eligible for Awards, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to: (i) determine which Subsidiaries and Affiliates shall be covered by the Plan; (ii) determine which individuals outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan which may include individuals who provide services to the Company, Subsidiary or Affiliate under an agreement with a foreign nation or agency; (iii) modify the terms and conditions of any Award granted to individuals outside the United States or foreign nationals to comply with applicable foreign laws, policies, customs and practices; (iv) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures, to the extent the Committee determines such actions to be necessary or advisable (and such subplans and/or modifications shall be attached A- 3 to this Plan as appendices); provided, however, that no such subplans and/or modifications shall increase the share limitations contained in Section 2.1 hereof; and (v) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that the Committee determines to be necessary or advisable to obtain approval or comply with any local governmental regulatory exemptions or approvals. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate the Exchange Act or any other applicable United States securities law, or any other applicable law. 5. OPTIONS. An Option is the right but not the obligation to purchase a Share, subject to certain conditions, if applicable. The Committee may grant Options to eligible Employees, Consultants and Directors and will determine whether such Options will be Incentive Stock Options within the meaning of the Code (“ISOs”) or Nonqualified Stock Options (“NSOs”), the number of Shares subject to the Option, the Exercise Price of the Option, the period during which the Option may vest and be exercised, and all other terms and conditions of the Option, subject to the following: 5.1. Option Grant. Each Option granted under this Plan will identify the Option as an ISO or an NSO. An Option may be, but need not be, awarded upon satisfaction of such Performance Factors during any Performance Period as are set out in advance in the Participant’s individual Award Agreement. If the Option is being earned upon the satisfaction of Performance Factors, then the Committee will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for each Option; and (y) select from among the Performance Factors to be used to measure the performance, if any. Performance Periods may overlap and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to Options that are subject to different performance goals and other criteria. 5.2. Date of Grant. The date of grant of an Option will be the date on which the Committee makes the determination to grant such Option, or a specified future date. The Award Agreement will be delivered to the Participant within a reasonable time after the granting of the Option. 5.3. Exercise Period. Options may be vested and exercisable within the times or upon the conditions as set forth in the Award Agreement governing such Option; provided, however, that no Option will be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date the Option is granted; and provided further that no ISO granted to a person who, at the time the ISO is granted, directly or by attribution owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Parent or Subsidiary of the Company (“Ten Percent Stockholder”) will be exercisable after the expiration of five (5) years from the date the ISO is granted. The Committee also may provide for Options to become exercisable at one time or from time to time, periodically or otherwise, in such number of Shares or percentage of Shares as the Committee determines. 5.4. Exercise Price. The Exercise Price of an Option will be determined by the Committee when the Option is granted; provided that: (i) the Exercise Price of an Option will be not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant and (ii) the Exercise Price of any ISO granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder will not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant. Payment for the Shares purchased may be made in accordance with Section 11 and the Award Agreement and in accordance with any procedures established by the Company. 5.5. Method of Exercise. Any Option granted hereunder will be vested and exercisable according to the terms of the Plan and at such times and under such conditions as determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a Share. An Option will be deemed exercised when the Company receives: (i) notice of exercise (in such form as the Committee may specify from time to time) from the person entitled to exercise the Option, and (ii) full payment for the Shares with respect to which the Option is exercised (together with applicable withholding taxes). Full payment may consist of any consideration and method of payment authorized by the Committee and permitted by the Award Agreement and the Plan. Shares issued upon exercise of an Option will be issued in the name of the Participant. Until the Shares are issued (as evidenced by the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company), no right to vote or receive dividends or any other rights as a stockholder will exist with respect to the Shares, notwithstanding the exercise of the Option. The Company will issue (or cause to be issued) such Shares promptly after the Option is exercised. No adjustment will be made for a dividend or other right for which the record date is prior to the date the Shares are issued, except as provided in Section 2.6 of the Plan. Exercising an Option in any manner will decrease the number of Shares thereafter available, both for purposes of the Plan and for sale under the Option, by the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised. A- 4 5.6. Termination of Service. (a) Not for Death, Disability or Cause. If the Participant’s Service terminates for any reason except for Cause or the Participant’s death or Disability, then the Participant may exercise such Participant’s Options only to the extent that such Options would have been exercisable by the Participant on the date Participant’s Service terminates no later than three (3) months after the date Participant’s Service terminates (or such shorter or longer time period as may be determined by the Committee, with any exercise beyond three (3) months after the date Participant’s Service terminates deemed to be the exercise of an NSO), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options. (b) Death. If the Participant’s Service terminates because of the Participant’s death (or the Participant dies within three (3) months after Participant’s Service terminates other than for Cause or because of the Participant’s Disability), then the Participant’s Options may be exercised only to the extent that such Options would have been exercisable by the Participant on the date Participant’s Service terminates and must be exercised by the Participant’s legal representative, or authorized assignee, no later than twelve (12) months after the date Participant’s Service terminates (or such shorter or longer time period as may be determined by the Committee), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options. (c) Disability. If the Participant’s Service terminates because of the Participant’s Disability, then the Participant’s Options may be exercised only to the extent that such Options would have been exercisable by the Participant on the date Participant’s Service terminates and must be exercised by the Participant (or the Participant’s legal representative or authorized assignee) no later than six (6) months after the date Participant’s Service terminates (with any exercise beyond (a) three (3) months after the date Participant’s employment terminates when the termination of Service is for a Disability that is not a “permanent and total disability” as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, or (b) six (6) months after the date Participant’s employment terminates when the termination of Service is for a Disability that is a “permanent and total disability” as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code, deemed to be exercise of an NSO), but in any event no later than the expiration date of the Options. (d) Cause. If the Participant is terminated for Cause, then Participant’s Options shall expire on such Participant’s date of termination of Service, or at such later time and on such conditions as are determined by the Committee, but in any no event later than the expiration date of the Options. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, Cause shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan. 5.7. Limitations on Exercise. The Committee may specify a minimum number of Shares that may be purchased on any exercise of an Option, provided that such minimum number will not prevent any Participant from exercising the Option for the full number of Shares for which it is then exercisable. 5.8. Limitations on ISOs. With respect to Awards granted as ISOs, to the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares with respect to which such ISOs are exercisable for the first time by the Participant during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and any Parent or Subsidiary) exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), such Options will be treated as NSOs. For purposes of this Section 5.8, ISOs will be taken into account in the order in which they were granted. The Fair Market Value of the Shares will be determined as of the time the Option with respect to such Shares is granted. In the event that the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder are amended after the Effective Date to provide for a different limit on the Fair Market Value of Shares permitted to be subject to ISOs, such different limit will be automatically incorporated herein and will apply to any Options granted after the effective date of such amendment. 5.9. Modification, Extension or Renewal. The Committee may modify, extend or renew outstanding Options and authorize the grant of new Options in substitution therefor, provided that any such action may not, without the written consent of a Participant, impair any of such Participant’s rights under any Option previously granted. Any outstanding ISO that is modified, extended, renewed or otherwise altered will be treated in accordance with Section 424(h) of the Code. Subject to Section 18 of this Plan, by written notice to affected Participants, the Committee may reduce the Exercise Price of outstanding Options without the consent of such Participants; provided, however, that the Exercise Price may not be reduced below the Fair Market Value on the date the action is taken to reduce the Exercise Price. A- 5 5.10. No Disqualification. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan, no term of this Plan relating to ISOs will be interpreted, amended or altered, nor will any discretion or authority granted under this Plan be exercised, so as to disqualify this Plan under Section 422 of the Code or, without the consent of the Participant affected, to disqualify any ISO under Section 422 of the Code. 6. RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS. A Restricted Stock Award is an offer by the Company to sell to an eligible Employee, Consultant, or Director Shares that are subject to restrictions (“Restricted Stock”). The Committee will determine to whom an offer will be made, the number of Shares the Participant may purchase, the Purchase Price, the restrictions under which the Shares will be subject and all other terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Award, subject to the Plan. 6.1. Restricted Stock Purchase Agreement. All purchases under a Restricted Stock Award will be evidenced by an Award Agreement. Except as may otherwise be provided in an Award Agreement, a Participant accepts a Restricted Stock Award by signing and delivering to the Company an Award Agreement with full payment of the Purchase Price, within thirty (30) days from the date the Award Agreement was delivered to the Participant. If the Participant does not accept such Award within thirty (30) days, then the offer of such Restricted Stock Award will terminate, unless the Committee determines otherwise. 6.2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for a Restricted Stock Award will be determined by the Committee and may be less than Fair Market Value on the date the Restricted Stock Award is granted. Payment of the Purchase Price must be made in accordance with Section 11 of the Plan, and the Award Agreement and in accordance with any procedures established by the Company. 6.3. Terms of Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted Stock Awards will be subject to such restrictions as the Committee may impose or are required by law. These restrictions may be based on completion of a specified number of years of service with the Company or upon completion of Performance Factors, if any, during any Performance Period as set out in advance in the Participant’s Award Agreement. Prior to the grant of a Restricted Stock Award, the Committee shall: (a) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for the Restricted Stock Award; (b) select from among the Performance Factors to be used to measure performance goals, if any; and (c) determine the number of Shares that may be awarded to the Participant. Performance Periods may overlap and a Participant may participate simultaneously with respect to Restricted Stock Awards that are subject to different Performance Periods and having different performance goals and other criteria. 6.4. Termination of Service. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such date Participant’s Service terminates (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). 7. STOCK BONUS AWARDS. A Stock Bonus Award is an award to an eligible Employee, Consultant, or Director of Shares for Services to be rendered or for past Services already rendered to the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary. All Stock Bonus Awards shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement. No payment from the Participant will be required for Shares awarded pursuant to a Stock Bonus Award. 7.1. Terms of Stock Bonus Awards. The Committee will determine the number of Shares to be awarded to the Participant under a Stock Bonus Award and any restrictions thereon. These restrictions may be based upon completion of a specified number of years of service with the Company or upon satisfaction of performance goals based on Performance Factors during any Performance Period as set out in advance in the Participant’s Stock Bonus Agreement. Prior to the grant of any Stock Bonus Award the Committee shall: (a) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for the Stock Bonus Award; (b) select from among the Performance Factors to be used to measure performance goals; and (c) determine the number of Shares that may be awarded to the Participant. Performance Periods may overlap and a Participant may participate simultaneously with respect to Stock Bonus Awards that are subject to different Performance Periods and different performance goals and other criteria. 7.2. Form of Payment to Participant. Payment may be made in the form of cash, whole Shares, or a combination thereof, based on the Fair Market Value of the Shares earned under a Stock Bonus Award on the date of payment, as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee. A- 6 7.3. Termination of Service. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such date Participant’s Service terminates (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS. A Stock Appreciation Right (“SAR”) is an award to an eligible Employee, 8. Consultant, or Director that may be settled in cash, or Shares (which may consist of Restricted Stock), having a value equal to (a) the difference between the Fair Market Value on the date of exercise over the Exercise Price multiplied by (b) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is being settled (subject to any maximum number of Shares that may be issuable as specified in an Award Agreement). All SARs shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement. 8.1. Terms of SARs. The Committee will determine the terms of each SAR including, without limitation: (a) the number of Shares subject to the SAR; (b) the Exercise Price and the time or times during which the SAR may be settled; (c) the consideration to be distributed on settlement of the SAR; and (d) the effect of the Participant’s termination of Service on each SAR. The Exercise Price of the SAR will be determined by the Committee when the SAR is granted, and may not be less than Fair Market Value. A SAR may be awarded upon satisfaction of Performance Factors, if any, during any Performance Period as are set out in advance in the Participant’s individual Award Agreement. If the SAR is being earned upon the satisfaction of Performance Factors, then the Committee will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for each SAR; and (y) select from among the Performance Factors to be used to measure the performance, if any. Performance Periods may overlap and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to SARs that are subject to different Performance Factors and other criteria. 8.2. Exercise Period and Expiration Date. A SAR will be exercisable within the times or upon the occurrence of events determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement governing such SAR. The SAR Agreement shall set forth the expiration date; provided that no SAR will be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years from the date the SAR is granted. The Committee may also provide for SARs to become exercisable at one time or from time to time, periodically or otherwise (including, without limitation, upon the attainment during a Performance Period of performance goals based on Performance Factors), in such number of Shares or percentage of the Shares subject to the SAR as the Committee determines. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on the date Participant’s Service terminates (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the rules of Section 5.6 also will apply to SARs. 8.3. Form of Settlement. Upon exercise of a SAR, a Participant will be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying (i) the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Exercise Price; times (ii) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. At the discretion of the Committee, the payment from the Company for the SAR exercise may be in cash, in Shares of equivalent value, or in some combination thereof. The portion of a SAR being settled may be paid currently or on a deferred basis with such interest or dividend equivalent, if any, as the Committee determines, provided that the terms of the SAR and any deferral satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. 8.4. Termination of Service. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such date Participant’s Service terminates (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS. A Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) is an award to an eligible Employee, Consultant, 9. or Director covering a number of Shares that may be settled in cash, or by issuance of those Shares (which may consist of Restricted Stock). All RSUs shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement. 9.1. Terms of RSUs. The Committee will determine the terms of an RSU including, without limitation: (a) the number of Shares subject to the RSU; (b) the time or times during which the RSU may be settled; (c) the consideration to be distributed on settlement; and (d) the effect of the Participant’s termination of Service on each RSU. An RSU may be awarded upon satisfaction of such performance goals based on Performance Factors during any Performance Period as are set out in advance in the Participant’s Award Agreement. If the RSU is being earned upon satisfaction of Performance Factors, then the Committee will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period for the RSU; (y) select from among the Performance Factors to be used to measure the performance, if any; and (z) determine the number of Shares deemed subject to the RSU. Performance Periods may overlap and participants may participate simultaneously with respect to RSUs that are subject to different Performance Periods and different performance goals and other criteria. A- 7 9.2. Form and Timing of Settlement. Payment of earned RSUs shall be made as soon as practicable after the date(s) determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may settle earned RSUs in cash, Shares, or a combination of both. The Committee may also permit a Participant to defer payment under a RSU to a date or dates after the RSU is earned provided that the terms of the RSU and any deferral satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. 9.3. Termination of Service. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on such date Participant’s Service terminates (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). 10. PERFORMANCE AWARDS. A Performance Award is an award to an eligible Employee, Consultant, or Director of a cash bonus or an award of Performance Shares denominated in Shares that may be settled in cash, or by issuance of those Shares (which may consist of Restricted Stock). Grants of Performance Awards shall be made pursuant to an Award Agreement. 10.1. Terms of Performance Shares. The Committee will determine, and each Award Agreement shall set forth, the terms of each Performance Award including, without limitation: (a) the amount of any cash bonus, (b) the number of Shares deemed subject to an award of Performance Shares; (c) the Performance Factors and Performance Period that shall determine the time and extent to which each award of Performance Shares shall be settled; (d) the consideration to be distributed on settlement, and (e) the effect of the Participant’s termination of Service on each Performance Award. In establishing Performance Factors and the Performance Period the Committee will: (x) determine the nature, length and starting date of any Performance Period; (y) select from among the Performance Factors to be used; and (z) determine the number of Shares deemed subject to the award of Performance Shares. Prior to settlement the Committee shall determine the extent to which Performance Awards have been earned. Performance Periods may overlap and Participants may participate simultaneously with respect to Performance Awards that are subject to different Performance Periods and different performance goals and other criteria. No Participant will be eligible to receive more than $1,000,000 in Performance Awards in any calendar year under this Plan. 10.2. Value, Earning and Timing of Performance Shares. Each Performance Share will have an initial value equal to the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. After the applicable Performance Period has ended, the holder of Performance Shares will be entitled to receive a payout of the number of Performance Shares earned by the Participant over the Performance Period, to be determined as a function of the extent to which the corresponding Performance Factors or other vesting provisions have been achieved. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may pay earned Performance Shares in the form of cash, in Shares (which have an aggregate Fair Market Value equal to the value of the earned Performance Shares at the close of the applicable Performance Period) or in a combination thereof. 10.3. Termination of Service. Except as may be set forth in the Participant’s Award Agreement, vesting ceases on the date Participant’s Service terminates (unless determined otherwise by the Committee). PAYMENT FOR SHARE PURCHASES. Payment from a Participant for Shares purchased pursuant to this Plan 11. may be made in cash or by check or, where approved for the Participant by the Committee and where permitted by law (and to the extent not otherwise set forth in the applicable Award Agreement): (a) by cancellation of indebtedness of the Company to the Participant; (b) by surrender of shares of the Company held by the Participant that have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which said Award will be exercised or settled; (c) by waiver of compensation due or accrued to the Participant for services rendered or to be rendered to the Company or a Parent or Subsidiary of the Company; (d) by consideration received by the Company pursuant to a broker-assisted or other form of cashless exercise program implemented by the Company in connection with the Plan; (e) by any combination of the foregoing; or A- 8 (f) by any other method of payment as is permitted by applicable law. 12. GRANTS TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS. Non-Employee Directors are eligible to receive any type of Award offered under this Plan except ISOs. Awards pursuant to this Section 12 may be automatically made pursuant to policy adopted by the Board, or made from time to time as determined in the discretion of the Board. The value of the Awards granted to a Non-Employee Director pursuant to this Section 12 in any calendar year shall not exceed $700,000. The value of Awards for purposes of complying with this maximum shall be determined based on grant date value as follows: (a) for Options and SARs, grant date fair value will be calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation methodology, based on a three- month trailing average of the Company’s closing stock price, or other accepted valuation methodology consistent with then- current accounting standards (as applied in a generally consistent manner among similar awards granted in the same year), and (b) for all Awards other than Options and SARs, grant date fair value will be determined based on a three-month trailing average of the Company’s closing stock price, or other accepted valuation methodology consistent with then-current accounting standards (as applied in a generally consistent manner among similar awards granted in the same year). 12.1. Eligibility. Awards pursuant to this Section 12 shall be granted only to Non-Employee Directors. A Non- Employee Director who is elected or re-elected as a member of the Board will be eligible to receive an Award under this Section 12. 12.2. Vesting, Exercisability and Settlement. Except as set forth in Section 21, Awards shall vest, become exercisable and be settled as determined by the Board. With respect to Options and SARs, the exercise price granted to Non- Employee Directors shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of the Shares at the time that such Option or SAR is granted. 12.3. Election to receive Awards in Lieu of Cash. A Non-Employee Director may elect to receive his or her annual retainer payments and/or meeting fees from the Company in the form of cash or Awards or a combination thereof, as determined by the Committee. Such Awards shall be issued under the Plan. An election under this Section 12.3 shall be filed with the Company on the form prescribed by the Company. 13. WITHHOLDING TAXES. 13.1. Withholding Generally. Whenever Shares are to be issued in satisfaction of Awards granted under this Plan or the applicable tax event occurs, the Company may require the Participant to remit to the Company, or to the Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate employing the Participant, an amount sufficient to satisfy applicable U.S. federal, state, local and international withholding tax requirements or any other tax or social insurance liability legally due from the Participant prior to the delivery of Shares pursuant to exercise or settlement of any Award. Whenever payments in satisfaction of Awards granted under this Plan are to be made in cash, such payment will be net of an amount sufficient to satisfy applicable U.S. federal, state, local and international withholding tax and social insurance requirements or any other tax liability legally due from the Participant. 13.2. Stock Withholding. The Committee, or its delegate(s), as permitted by applicable law, in its sole discretion and pursuant to such procedures as it may specify from time to time and to limitations of local law, may require or permit a Participant to satisfy such tax withholding obligation or any other tax liability legally due from the Participant, in whole or in part by (without limitation) (i) paying cash, (ii) electing to have the Company withhold otherwise deliverable cash or Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum statutory amount required to be withheld, (iii) delivering to the Company already-owned Shares having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount required to be withheld or (iv) withholding from the proceeds of the sale of otherwise deliverable Shares acquired pursuant to an Award either through a voluntary sale or through a mandatory sale arranged by the Company. The Fair Market Value of the Shares to be withheld or delivered will be determined as of the date that the taxes are required to be withheld. 14. TRANSFERABILITY. 14.1. Transfer Generally. Unless determined otherwise by the Committee or pursuant to Section 14.2, an Award may not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred, or disposed of in any manner other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution. If the Committee makes an Award transferable, including, without limitation, by instrument to an inter vivos or testamentary trust in which the Awards are to be passed to beneficiaries upon the death of the trustor (settlor) or by gift or by domestic relations order to a Permitted Transferee, such Award will contain such additional terms and A- 9 conditions as the Committee deems appropriate. All Awards shall be exercisable: (i) during the Participant’s lifetime only by (A) the Participant, or (B) the Participant’s guardian or legal representative; (ii) after the Participant’s death, by the legal representative of the Participant’s heirs or legatees; and (iii) in the case of all awards except ISOs, by a Permitted Transferee. 14.2. Award Transfer Program. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Plan, the Committee shall have all discretion and authority to determine and implement the terms and conditions of any Award Transfer Program instituted pursuant to this Section 14.2 and shall have the authority to amend the terms of any Award participating, or otherwise eligible to participate in, the Award Transfer Program, including (but not limited to) the authority to (i) amend (including to extend) the expiration date, post-termination exercise period and/or forfeiture conditions of any such Award, (ii) amend or remove any provisions of the Award relating to the Award holder’s continued service to the Company or its Parent or any Subsidiary, (iii) amend the permissible payment methods with respect to the exercise or purchase of any such Award, (iv) amend the adjustments to be implemented in the event of changes in the capitalization and other similar events with respect to such Award, and (v) make such other changes to the terms of such Award as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate in its sole discretion. 15. PRIVILEGES OF STOCK OWNERSHIP; RESTRICTIONS ON SHARES. 15.1. Voting and Dividends. No Participant will have any of the rights of a stockholder with respect to any Shares until the Shares are issued to the Participant, except for any dividend equivalent rights permitted by an applicable Award Agreement. After Shares are issued to the Participant, the Participant will be a stockholder and have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to such Shares, including the right to vote and receive all dividends or other distributions made or paid with respect to such Shares; provided, that if such Shares are Restricted Stock, then any new, additional or different securities the Participant may become entitled to receive with respect to such Shares by virtue of a stock dividend, stock split or any other change in the corporate or capital structure of the Company will be subject to the same restrictions as the Restricted Stock; provided, further, that the Participant will have no right to retain such stock dividends or stock distributions with respect to Shares that are repurchased at the Participant’s Purchase Price or Exercise Price, as the case may be, pursuant to Section 15.2. 15.2. Restrictions on Shares. At the discretion of the Committee, the Company may reserve to itself and/or its assignee(s) a right to repurchase (a “Right of Repurchase”) a portion of any or all Unvested Shares held by a Participant following such Participant’s termination of Service at any time within ninety (90) days (or such longer or shorter time determined by the Committee) after the later of the date Participant’s Service terminates and the date the Participant purchases Shares under this Plan, for cash and/or cancellation of purchase money indebtedness, at the Participant’s Purchase Price or Exercise Price, as the case may be. 16. CERTIFICATES. All Shares or other securities whether or not certificated, delivered under this Plan will be subject to such stock transfer orders, legends and other restrictions as the Committee may deem necessary or advisable, including restrictions under any applicable U.S. federal, state or foreign securities law, or any rules, regulations and other requirements of the SEC or any stock exchange or automated quotation system upon which the Shares may be listed or quoted and any non-U.S. exchange controls or securities law restrictions to which the Shares are subject. ESCROW; PLEDGE OF SHARES. To enforce any restrictions on a Participant’s Shares, the Committee may 17. require the Participant to deposit all certificates representing Shares, together with stock powers or other instruments of transfer approved by the Committee, appropriately endorsed in blank, with the Company or an agent designated by the Company to hold in escrow until such restrictions have lapsed or terminated, and the Committee may cause a legend or legends referencing such restrictions to be placed on the certificates. Any Participant who is permitted to execute a promissory note as partial or full consideration for the purchase of Shares under this Plan will be required to pledge and deposit with the Company all or part of the Shares so purchased as collateral to secure the payment of the Participant’s obligation to the Company under the promissory note; provided, however, that the Committee may require or accept other or additional forms of collateral to secure the payment of such obligation and, in any event, the Company will have full recourse against the Participant under the promissory note notwithstanding any pledge of the Participant’s Shares or other collateral. In connection with any pledge of the Shares, the Participant will be required to execute and deliver a written pledge agreement in such form as the Committee will from time to time approve. The Shares purchased with the promissory note may be released from the pledge on a pro rata basis as the promissory note is paid. A- 10 18. REPRICING; EXCHANGE AND BUYOUT OF AWARDS. Without prior stockholder approval, the Committee may (i) reprice Options or SARs (and where such repricing is a reduction in the Exercise Price of outstanding Options or SARs, the consent of the affected Participants is not required provided written notice is provided to them, notwithstanding any adverse tax consequences to them arising from the repricing), and (ii) with the consent of the respective Participants (unless not required pursuant to Section 5.8 of the Plan), pay cash or issue new Awards in exchange for the surrender and cancellation of any, or all, outstanding Awards. SECURITIES LAW AND OTHER REGULATORY COMPLIANCE. An Award will not be effective unless 19. such Award is in compliance with all applicable U.S. and foreign federal and state securities and exchange control laws, rules and regulations of any governmental body, and the requirements of any stock exchange or automated quotation system upon which the Shares may then be listed or quoted, as they are in effect on the date of grant of the Award and also on the date of exercise or other issuance. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan, the Company will have no obligation to issue or deliver certificates for Shares under this Plan prior to: (a) obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable; and/or (b) completion of any registration or other qualification of such Shares under any state or federal or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable. The Company will be under no obligation to register the Shares with the SEC or to effect compliance with the registration, qualification or listing requirements of any foreign or state securities laws, exchange control laws, stock exchange or automated quotation system, and the Company will have no liability for any inability or failure to do so. 20. NO OBLIGATION TO EMPLOY. Nothing in this Plan or any Award granted under this Plan will confer or be deemed to confer on any Participant any right to continue in the employ of, or to continue any other relationship with, the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate to terminate Participant’s employment or other relationship at any time. 21. CORPORATE TRANSACTIONS. 21.1. Assumption or Replacement of Awards by Successor. In the event that the Company is subject to a Corporate Transaction, outstanding Awards acquired under the Plan shall be subject to the agreement evidencing the Corporate Transaction, which need not treat all outstanding Awards in an identical manner. Such agreement, without the Participant’s consent, shall provide for one or more of the following with respect to all outstanding Awards as of the effective date of such Corporate Transaction. (a) The continuation of an outstanding Award by the Company (if the Company is the successor entity). (b) The assumption of an outstanding Award by the successor or acquiring entity (if any) of such Corporate Transaction (or by its parents, if any), which assumption, will be binding on all selected Participants; provided that the exercise price and the number and nature of shares issuable upon exercise of any such option or stock appreciation right, or any award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, will be adjusted appropriately pursuant to Section 424(a) of the Code. (c) The substitution by the successor or acquiring entity in such Corporate Transaction (or by its parents, if any) of equivalent awards with substantially the same terms for such outstanding Awards (except that the exercise price and the number and nature of shares issuable upon exercise of any such option or stock appreciation right, or any award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, will be adjusted appropriately pursuant to Section 424(a) of the Code). (d) The full acceleration of exercisability or vesting and accelerated expiration of an outstanding Award and lapse of the Company’s right to repurchase or re-acquire shares acquired under an Award or lapse of forfeiture rights with respect to shares acquired under an Award. (e) The settlement of the full value of such outstanding Award (whether or not then vested or exercisable) in cash, cash equivalents, or securities of the successor entity (or its parent, if any) with a Fair Market Value equal to the required amount, followed by the cancellation of such Awards; provided however, that such Award may be cancelled if such Award has no value, as determined by the Committee, in its discretion. Subject to Section 409A of the Code, such payment may be made in installments and may be deferred until the date or dates the Award would have become exercisable or vested. Such payment may be subject to vesting based on the Participant’s continued service, provided that the vesting schedule shall not be less favorable to the Participant than the schedule under which the Award would have become vested or exercisable. A- 11 For purposes of this Section 21.1(e), the Fair Market Value of any security shall be determined without regard to any vesting conditions that may apply to such security. The Board shall have full power and authority to assign the Company’s right to repurchase or re-acquire or forfeiture rights to such successor or acquiring corporation. In addition, in the event such successor or acquiring corporation refuses to assume, convert, replace or substitute Awards, as provided above, pursuant to a Corporate Transaction, the Committee will notify the Participant in writing or electronically that such Award will be exercisable for a period of time determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and such Award will terminate upon the expiration of such period. Awards need not be treated similarly in a Corporate Transaction. 21.2. Assumption of Awards by the Company. The Company, from time to time, also may substitute or assume outstanding awards granted by another company, whether in connection with an acquisition of such other company or otherwise, by either; (a) granting an Award under this Plan in substitution of such other company’s award; or (b) assuming such award as if it had been granted under this Plan if the terms of such assumed award could be applied to an Award granted under this Plan. Such substitution or assumption will be permissible if the holder of the substituted or assumed award would have been eligible to be granted an Award under this Plan if the other company had applied the rules of this Plan to such grant. In the event the Company assumes an award granted by another company, the terms and conditions of such award will remain unchanged (except that the Purchase Price or the Exercise Price, as the case may be, and the number and nature of Shares issuable upon exercise or settlement of any such Award will be adjusted appropriately pursuant to Section 424(a) of the Code). In the event the Company elects to grant a new Option in substitution rather than assuming an existing option, such new Option may be granted with a similarly adjusted Exercise Price. Substitute Awards shall not reduce the number of Shares authorized for grant under the Plan or authorized for grant to a Participant in a calendar year. 21.3. Non-Employee Directors’ Awards. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, in the event of a Corporate Transaction, the vesting of all Awards granted to Non-Employee Directors shall accelerate and such Awards shall become exercisable (as applicable) in full prior to the consummation of such event at such times and on such conditions as the Committee determines. 22. ADOPTION AND STOCKHOLDER APPROVAL. This Plan shall be submitted for the approval of the Company’s stockholders, consistent with applicable laws, within twelve (12) months before or after the date this Plan is adopted by the Board. 23. TERM OF PLAN/GOVERNING LAW. Unless earlier terminated as provided herein, this Plan will become effective on the Effective Date and will terminate ten (10) years from the date this Plan is adopted by the Board. This Plan and all Awards granted hereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware (excluding its conflict of laws rules). 24. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN. The Board may at any time terminate or amend this Plan in any respect, including, without limitation, amendment of any form of Award Agreement or instrument to be executed pursuant to this Plan; provided, however, that the Board will not, without the approval of the stockholders of the Company, amend this Plan in any manner that requires such stockholder approval; provided further, that a Participant’s Award shall be governed by the version of this Plan then in effect at the time such Award was granted. 25. NONEXCLUSIVITY OF THE PLAN. Neither the adoption of this Plan by the Board, the submission of this Plan to the stockholders of the Company for approval, nor any provision of this Plan will be construed as creating any limitations on the power of the Board to adopt such additional compensation arrangements as it may deem desirable, including, without limitation, the granting of stock awards and bonuses otherwise than under this Plan, and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases. INSIDER TRADING POLICY. Each Participant who receives an Award shall comply with any policy adopted 26. by the Company from time to time covering transactions in the Company’s securities by Employees, officers and/or directors of the Company. ALL AWARDS SUBJECT TO COMPANY CLAWBACK OR RECOUPMENT POLICY. All Awards, subject 27. to applicable law, shall be subject to clawback or recoupment pursuant to any compensation clawback or recoupment policy A- 12 adopted by the Board or required by law during the term of Participant’s employment or other service with the Company that is applicable to executive officers, employees, directors or other service providers of the Company, and in addition to any other remedies available under such policy and applicable law, may require the cancellation of outstanding Awards and the recoupment of any gains realized with respect to Awards. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Plan, and except as elsewhere defined herein, the following terms will have the 28. following meanings: 28.1. “Affiliate” means (i) any entity that, directly or indirectly, is controlled by, controls or is under common control with, the Company and (ii) any entity in which the Company has a significant equity interest, in either case as determined by the Committee, whether now or hereafter existing. 28.2. “Award” means any award under the Plan, including any Option, Restricted Stock, Stock Bonus, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Unit or award of Performance Shares. 28.3. “Award Agreement” means, with respect to each Award, the written or electronic agreement between the Company and the Participant setting forth the terms and conditions of the Award and country-specific appendix thereto for grants to non-U.S. Participants, which shall be in substantially a form (which need not be the same for each Participant) that the Committee (or in the case of Award agreements that are not used for Insiders, the Committee's delegate(s)) has from time to time approved, and will comply with and be subject to the terms and conditions of this Plan. 28.4. “Award Transfer Program” means any program instituted by the Committee which would permit Participants the opportunity to transfer any outstanding Awards to a financial institution or other person or entity approved by the Committee. 28.5. “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company. 28.6. “Cause” means (i) Participant’s willful failure substantially to perform his or her duties and responsibilities to the Company or deliberate violation of a Company policy; (ii) Participant’s commission of any act of fraud, embezzlement, dishonesty or any other willful misconduct that has caused or is reasonably expected to result in material injury to the Company; (iii) unauthorized use or disclosure by Participant of any proprietary information or trade secrets of the Company or any other party to whom the Participant owes an obligation of nondisclosure as a result of his or her relationship with the Company; or (iv) Participant’s willful breach of any of his or her obligations under any written agreement or covenant with the Company. The determination as to whether a Participant is being terminated for Cause shall be made in good faith by the Company and shall be final and binding on the Participant. The foregoing definition does not in any way limit the Company’s ability to terminate a Participant’s employment or consulting relationship at any time as provided in Section 20 above, and the term “Company” will be interpreted to include any Subsidiary or Parent, as appropriate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the foregoing definition of “Cause” may, in part or in whole, be modified or replaced in each individual agreement or Award Agreement with any Participant, provided that such document supersedes the definition provided in this Section 28.6. 28.7. “Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. 28.8. “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or those persons to whom administration of the Plan, or part of the Plan, has been delegated as permitted by law. 28.9. “Common Stock” means the Class A common stock of the Company. 28.10. “Company” means GoPro, Inc., or any successor corporation. 28.11. “Consultant” means any person, including an advisor or independent contractor, engaged by the Company or a Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate to render services to such entity. 28.12. “Corporate Transaction” means the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any “person” (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act) becomes the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of A- 13 the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the Company’s then-outstanding voting securities; provided, however, that for purposes of this subclause (i) the acquisition of additional securities by any one Person who is considered to own more than fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power of the securities of the Company will not be considered a Corporate Transaction; (ii) the consummation of the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; (iii) the consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or its parent) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or its parent outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; (iv) any other transaction which qualifies as a “corporate transaction” under Section 424(a) of the Code wherein the stockholders of the Company give up all of their equity interest in the Company (except for the acquisition, sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the outstanding shares of the Company) or (v) a change in the effective control of the Company that occurs on the date that a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any twelve (12) month period by members of the Board whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board prior to the date of the appointment or election. For purpose of this subclause (v), if any Person is considered to be in effective control of the Company, the acquisition of additional control of the Company by the same Person will not be considered a Corporate Transaction. For purposes of this definition, Persons will be considered to be acting as a group if they are owners of a corporation that enters into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar business transaction with the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any amount constituting deferred compensation (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) would become payable under this Plan by reason of a Corporate Transaction, such amount shall become payable only if the event constituting a Corporate Transaction would also qualify as a change in ownership or effective control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company, each as defined within the meaning of Code Section 409A, as it has been and may be amended from time to time, and any proposed or final Treasury Regulations and IRS guidance that has been promulgated or may be promulgated thereunder from time to time. 28.13. “Director” means a member of the Board. 28.14. “Disability” means in the case of incentive stock options, total and permanent disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code and in the case of other Awards, that the Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. 28.15. “Effective Date” means the day immediately prior to the date of the underwritten initial public offering of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to a registration statement that is declared effective by the SEC. 28.16. “Employee” means any person, including officers and Directors, providing services as an employee to the Company or any Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate. Neither service as a Director nor payment of a director’s fee by the Company will be sufficient to constitute “employment” by the Company. 28.17. “Exchange Act” means the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 28.18. “Exchange Program” means a program pursuant to which (i) outstanding Awards are surrendered, cancelled or exchanged for cash, the same type of Award or a different Award (or combination thereof) or (ii) the exercise price of an outstanding Award is increased or reduced. 28.19. “Exercise Price” means, with respect to an Option, the price at which a holder may purchase the Shares issuable upon exercise of an Option and with respect to a SAR, the price at which the SAR is granted to the holder thereof. 28.20. “Fair Market Value” means, as of any date, the value of a share of the Company’s Common Stock determined as follows: (a) if such Common Stock is publicly traded and is then listed on a national securities exchange, its closing price on the date of determination on the principal national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is listed or admitted to trading as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; A- 14 (b) if such Common Stock is publicly traded but is neither listed nor admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, the average of the closing bid and asked prices on the date of determination as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; (c) in the case of an Option or SAR grant made on the Effective Date, the price per share at which shares of the Company’s Common Stock are initially offered for sale to the public by the Company’s underwriters in the initial public offering of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC under the Securities Act; or (d) if none of the foregoing is applicable, by the Board or the Committee in good faith. 28.21. “Insider” means an officer or director of the Company or any other person whose transactions in the Company’s Common Stock are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act. 28.22. “IRS” means the United States Internal Revenue Service. 28.23. “Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not an Employee of the Company or any Parent or Subsidiary. 28.24. “Option” means an award of an option to purchase Shares pursuant to Section 5. 28.25. “Parent” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company if each of such corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain. 28.26. “Participant” means a person who holds an Award under this Plan. 28.27. “Performance Award” means cash or stock granted pursuant to Section 10 or Section 12 of the Plan. 28.28. “Performance Factors” means any of the factors selected by the Committee and specified in an Award Agreement, from among the following objective measures, either individually, alternatively or in any combination, applied to the Company as a whole or any business unit or Subsidiary, either individually, alternatively, or in any combination, on a GAAP or non-GAAP basis, and measured, to the extent applicable on an absolute basis or relative to a pre-established target, to determine whether the performance goals established by the Committee with respect to applicable Awards have been satisfied: (a) Profit Before Tax; (b) Billings; (c) Revenue; (d) Net revenue; (e) Earnings (which may include earnings before interest and taxes, earnings before taxes, and net earnings); (f) Operating income; (g) Operating margin; (h) Operating profit; (i) (j) Controllable operating profit, or net operating profit; Net Profit; A- 15 (k) Gross margin; (l) Operating expenses or operating expenses as a percentage of revenue; (m) Net income; (n) Earnings per share; (o) Total stockholder return; (p) Market share; (q) Return on assets or net assets; (r) (s) (t) The Company’s stock price; Growth in stockholder value relative to a pre-determined index; Return on equity; (u) Return on invested capital; (v) Cash Flow (including free cash flow or operating cash flows) (w) Cash conversion cycle; (x) (y) (z) Economic value added; Individual confidential business objectives; Contract awards or backlog; (aa) Overhead or other expense reduction; (bb) Credit rating; (cc) Strategic plan development and implementation; (dd) Succession plan development and implementation; (ee) Improvement in workforce diversity; (ff) Customer indicators; (gg) New product invention or innovation; (hh) Attainment of research and development milestones; (ii) Improvements in productivity; (jj) Bookings; (kk) Attainment of objective operating goals and employee metrics; and (ll) Any other metric that is capable of measurement as determined by the Committee. A- 16 The Committee may, in recognition of unusual or non-recurring items such as acquisition-related activities or changes in applicable accounting rules, provide for one or more equitable adjustments (based on objective standards) to the Performance Factors to preserve the Committee’s original intent regarding the Performance Factors at the time of the initial award grant. It is within the sole discretion of the Committee to make or not make any such equitable adjustments. 28.29. “Performance Period” means the period of service determined by the Committee, not to exceed five (5) years, during which years of service or performance is to be measured for the Award. 28.30. “Performance Share” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 10 or Section 12 of the Plan. 28.31. “Permitted Transferee” means any child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister- in-law (including adoptive relationships) of the Employee, any person sharing the Employee’s household (other than a tenant or employee), a trust in which these persons (or the Employee) have more than 50% of the beneficial interest, a foundation in which these persons (or the Employee) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the Employee) own more than 50% of the voting interests. 28.32. “Person” shall have the meaning as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act. 28.33. “Plan” means this GoPro, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. 28.34. “Purchase Price” means the price to be paid for Shares acquired under the Plan, other than Shares acquired upon exercise of an Option or SAR. 28.35. “Restricted Stock Award” means an award of Shares pursuant to Section 6 or Section 12 of the Plan, or issued pursuant to the early exercise of an Option. 28.36. “Restricted Stock Unit” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 9 or Section 12 of the Plan. 28.37. “SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 28.38. “Securities Act” means the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 28.39. “Service” shall mean service as an Employee, Consultant, Director or Non-Employee Director, to the Company or a Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Company, subject to such further limitations as may be set forth in the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement. An Employee will not be deemed to have ceased to provide Service in the case of (i) sick leave, (ii) military leave, or (iii) any other leave of absence approved by the Company; provided, that such leave is for a period of not more than 90 days, unless reemployment upon the expiration of such leave is guaranteed by contract or statute or unless provided otherwise pursuant to formal policy adopted from time to time by the Company. In the case of any Employee on an approved leave of absence or a reduction in hours worked (for illustrative purposes only, a change in schedule from that of full-time to part-time), the Company may make such provisions respecting suspension of or modification of vesting of the Award while on leave from the employ of the Company or a Parent, Subsidiary or Affiliate or during such change in working hours as it may deem appropriate, except that in no event may an Award be exercised after the expiration of the term set forth in the applicable Award Agreement. In the event of military leave, if required by applicable laws, vesting shall continue for the longest period that vesting continues under any other statutory or Company approved leave of absence and, upon a Participant’s returning from military leave (under conditions that would entitle him or her to protection upon such return under the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act), he or she shall be given vesting credit with respect to Awards to the same extent as would have applied had the Participant continued to provide services to the Company throughout the leave on the same terms as he or she was providing services immediately prior to such leave. Except as set forth in this Section 28.39, an employee shall have terminated employment as of the date he or she ceases to provide services (regardless of whether the termination is in breach of local employment laws or is later found to be invalid) and employment shall not be extended by any notice period or garden leave mandated by local law, provided however, that a change in status from an employee to a consultant or advisor shall not terminate the service provider’s Service, unless determined by the Committee, in its discretion. The Committee will have sole discretion to determine whether a Participant has ceased to provide Services and the effective date on which the Participant ceased to provide Services. A- 17 28.40. “Shares” means shares of the Common Stock and the common stock of any successor security. 28.41. “Stock Appreciation Right” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 8 or Section 12 of the Plan. 28.42. “Stock Bonus” means an Award granted pursuant to Section 7 or Section 12 of the Plan. 28.43. “Subsidiary” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if each of the corporations other than the last corporation in the unbroken chain owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in such chain. 28.44. “Treasury Regulations” means regulations promulgated by the United States Treasury Department. 28.45. “Unvested Shares” means Shares that have not yet vested or are subject to a right of repurchase in favor of the Company (or any successor thereto). A- 18 GOPRO, INC. 2014 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FRENCH SUBPLAN 1. Introduction. The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of GoPro, Inc. (the “Company”) has established the GoPro, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “U.S. Plan”) to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are important to the success of the Company, and any Parents and Subsidiaries that exist now or in the future, including those at the Company’s French Subsidiaries, of which the Company holds directly or indirectly at least 10% of the share capital (each a “French Entity”), by offering them an opportunity to participate in the Company’s future performance through the grant of Awards. Sections 4.1(o) and 4.5 of the U.S. Plan authorize the Committee (as defined in the U.S. Plan) to establish subplans and to modify the terms and conditions of any award granted to individuals outside the United States to the extent the Committee determines such actions to be necessary or advisable or to comply or facilitate compliance with applicable foreign laws and regulations. The Committee has determined that it is advisable to establish a subplan for the purpose of permitting restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted to employees or officers of a French Entity to qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment available for such grants in France. The Committee, therefore, intends to establish a subplan of the U.S. Plan for the purpose of granting RSUs that qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment in France applicable to Company shares granted for no consideration under Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended (“French-Qualified RSUs”), to qualifying employees who are resident in France for French tax purposes and/ or subject to the French social security regime (the “French Participants”). The terms of the U.S. Plan, as set out in Appendix A hereto, are subject to the limitations in the following rules, and together constitute the rules of the GoPro, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan French Subplan (this “French Subplan”). Under this French Subplan, French Participants will be granted RSUs only as defined in Section 2 hereunder. The provisions of the U.S. Plan permitting the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, stock bonus awards, stock appreciation rights and performance awards are not applicable to grants made under this French Subplan. 2. Definitions. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the U.S. Plan. The terms set out below will have the following meanings: (a) RSUs. The term “RSUs” shall mean an award granted pursuant to Sections 9 and 12 of the U.S. Plan which is a promise by the Company to issue one Share for each RSU granted to a French Participant, at the end of a specified restricted period, provided certain vesting requirements are satisfied, for no consideration and to which any dividend and voting rights shall attach only upon the issuance of Shares at the time of vesting of the RSUs. RSUs will not be settled in cash. (b) Date of Grant. The term “Date of Grant” shall mean the date on which the Committee both (1) designates the French Participant, and (2) specifies the terms and conditions of the RSUs, including the number of Shares to be issued at a future date, the conditions for the vesting of the RSUs and the conditions for the issuance of the Shares underlying the RSUs by the Company, if any, and the conditions for the transferability of the Shares once issued, if any. (c) Vesting Date. A- 19 The term “Vesting Date” shall mean the date on which French Participants are entitled to receive the Shares related to the RSUs, as specified by the Committee. To qualify for the French specific tax and social security regime, such Vesting Date shall not occur prior to the expiration of the minimum mandatory vesting period applicable to French-Qualified RSUs under Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended and applicable as of the Date of Grant, or the relevant sections of the French Tax Code or the French Social Security Code, as amended. Any additional conditions for the vesting may be provided for in the RSU award agreement for French Participants or other writing evidencing the RSUs provided by the Company. (d) Closed Period. The term “Closed Period” shall mean such period as set forth in Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, which is applicable to companies whose shares are listed on a regulated market and is as follows: (i) Ten quotation days preceding and three quotation days following the disclosure to the public of the consolidated financial statements or the annual statements of the Company; or (ii) Any period during which the corporate management of the Company involved in the governance of the Company (such as the Board or the Committee) possesses confidential information which could, if disclosed to the public, significantly impact the trading price of the Shares, until ten quotation days after the day such information is disclosed to the public. If the French Commercial Code is amended after adoption of this French Subplan to modify the definition and/or the applicability of the Closed Periods to French-Qualified RSUs, such amendments shall become applicable to any French- Qualified RSUs granted under this French Subplan, to the extent required by French law. (e) Disability. The term “Disability” shall mean disability as defined under categories 2 ° and 3 ° of Section L. 341-4 of the French Social Security Code, as amended, and subject to the fulfillment of related conditions. 3. Eligibility to Participate. (a) Subject to Sections 3(b) and (c) below, any French Participant who, on the Date of Grant and to the extent required under French law, is either employed under the terms and conditions of an employment contract with a French Entity (“contrat de travail”), or who is a managing corporate officer of a French Entity (e.g., Président du Conseil d'Administration, Directeur Général, Directeur Général Délégué, Membre du Directoire, Gérant de Sociétés par actions), shall, at the discretion of the Committee, be eligible to receive RSUs under this French Subplan, provided that he or she also satisfies the eligibility conditions of the U.S. Plan. (b) RSUs may not be issued to corporate officers of a French Entity, other than the managing corporate officers (e.g., Président du Conseil d’Administration, Directeur Général, Directeur Général Délégué, Membre du Directoire, Gérant de Sociétés par actions), unless the corporate officer is an employee of a French Entity as defined by French law and is otherwise eligible to receive RSUs under the U.S. Plan. (c) RSUs may not be issued under this French Subplan to employees or (managing) corporate officers owning more than ten percent (10%) of the Company’s share capital or to individuals other than eligible employees and (managing) corporate officers of the French Entities. (d) To the extent permissible under French tax and social security laws, including guidelines and specific tax or social security rulings issued by French tax and social security authorities, any individual who is employed by the Company or a Subsidiary shall be eligible to receive RSUs under this French Subplan (provided that he or she also satisfies the eligibility conditions of the U.S. Plan) even if the individual is not a French tax resident and/or subject to the French social contribution regime on the Date of Grant, and such an individual shall be considered, to the extent applicable, as a French Participant. 4. Conditions of the RSUs. (a) Vesting of RSUs. A- 20 RSUs will not vest prior to the Vesting Date defined under Section 2(c) above and provided any additional conditions for the vesting that may be provided for in the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement are satisfied. However, notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the death of a French Participant, all of his or her outstanding RSUs shall vest under the conditions set forth in Section 5 of this French Subplan. (b) Holding of Shares. The Shares issued pursuant to the RSUs held by the French Participants may be subject to a minimum mandatory holding period which may be required under Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, or under the relevant sections of the French Tax Code or the French Social Security Code, as amended, to benefit from the specific tax and social security regime, and the same may be imposed on such Shares for the French Participants to benefit from the specific tax and social security regime. This holding period will continue to apply even after the French Participant is no longer an employee or (managing) corporate officer of a French Entity or another Subsidiary, except in case of death or Disability of the French Participant. In addition, the Shares may not be sold or transferred during certain Closed Periods as provided for by Section L. 225-197-1 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and as interpreted by the French administrative guidelines, to the extent Closed Periods are applicable to Shares issued pursuant to this French Subplan. (c) French Participant’s Account. To the extent required to benefit from the French specific tax and social security regime, the Shares issued to a French Participant shall be recorded in the name of the French Participant in an account with the Company or a broker or in such other manner as the Company may otherwise determine to ensure compliance with any applicable restrictions and holding periods as provided by French law. 5. Death and Disability. In the event of the death of a French Participant, any outstanding RSUs become transferable to the French Participant’s heirs, who can request the issuance of the Shares related to all outstanding RSUs within six months following the death of the French Participant. If Shares are not requested by the heirs within such six-month period, any outstanding RSUs will be forfeited at the end of such six-month period. The French Participant’s heirs are not subject to the restrictions on the sale of Shares set forth in Section 4(b) above, if any. In the event of Disability of the French Participant, the French Participant will no longer be subject to the restrictions on the sale of Shares set forth in Section 4(b) above, if any. 6. Adjustments and Change in Capital Structure. In the event of a change in capitalization or a corporate transaction as set forth in Sections 2.6 and 21 of the U.S. Plan, adjustment to the terms and conditions of the French-Qualified RSUs or underlying Shares may be made only in accordance with the U.S. Plan and pursuant to applicable French legal, tax and social security rules. Nevertheless, the Committee, in its discretion, may decide to make adjustments in the case of a transaction for which adjustments are not authorized under French law, in which case the RSUs may no longer qualify as French-Qualified RSUs and the specific tax and social security treatment may be lost. Assumption or substitution of the RSUs in case of a corporate transaction as well as an acceleration of vesting or waiver of holding periods, if any, or any other mechanism implemented upon a merger or change of control, or in any other events, may result in the RSUs being no longer eligible to the specific French tax and social security regime. 7. Disqualification of RSUs. In the event changes are made to the terms and conditions of the RSUs or to the underlying Shares due to any requirements under the applicable laws or by decision of the Company’s shareholders, the Board or the Committee, the RSUs A- 21 or underlying Shares may no longer qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment pursuant to Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended. If the RSUs or underlying Shares no longer qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment pursuant to Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, the Committee may, provided it is authorized to do so under the U.S. Plan, determine to lift, shorten or terminate certain restrictions applicable to the vesting of the RSUs or the sale of the Shares underlying the RSUs which may have been imposed under this French Subplan or in the RSU award agreement or other writing delivered to the French Participant. In the event that any Restricted Stock Units or underlying Shares no longer qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment pursuant to Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, the holder of such Restricted Stock Units shall be ultimately liable and responsible for all taxes and/or social security contributions that he or she is legally required to pay in connection with such Restricted Stock Units or underlying Shares. 8. Interpretation. It is intended that the RSUs granted under this French Subplan shall qualify for the specific tax and social security treatment applicable to French-Qualified RSUs granted under Sections L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-6 of the French Commercial Code, as amended, and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax and social security laws. However, the Company makes no guarantee or undertaking that the RSUs will retain this status. The terms of this French Subplan shall be interpreted according to and in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth by French tax and social security laws, as well as the guidance of the French tax and social security administrations and the relevant guidelines released by the French tax and social security authorities and subject to the fulfillment of legal, tax and reporting obligations, as applicable. 9. Employment Rights. The adoption of this French Subplan shall not confer upon the French Participants or any employee of a French Entity any employment rights, and shall not be construed as a part of any employment contracts that a French Entity has with its employees. 10. Non-Transferability. Notwithstanding any provision in the U.S. Plan to the contrary and, except in the case of death, the Restricted Stock Units shall not be transferred to any third party and Shares shall be issued only to the French Participant during his or her lifetime. 11. Amendments. Subject to the terms of the U.S. Plan, the Committee reserves the right to amend or terminate this French Subplan at any time. 12. Effective Date and Term of French Subplan. This French Subplan is effective as of June 6, 2016. A- 22 APPENDIX A GoPro, Inc. Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (see 2014 EIP in Appendix A to the Proxy Statement) A- 23 [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] APPENDIX B Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Corporate Performance Measures GAAP gross margin Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Non-GAAP gross margin (dollars in thousands) GAAP operating expenses Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Bonus expenses Restructuring costs Non-GAAP bonus plan operating expenses 2017 32.6% 0.1 0.5 0.1 33.3% 2017 547,990 (49,320) (3,006) (12,703) (19,658) 463,303 $ $ B- 1 [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K  � ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________________ to ________________ Commission file number: 001-36514 GOPRO, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 77-0629474 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 3000 Clearview Way San Mateo, California (Address of principal executive offices) 94402 (Zip Code) (650) 332-7600 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 (Title of each class) The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (Name of each exchange on which registered) Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of Act. Yes  No  Yes  No  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No � Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  No � Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one). Large accelerated filer  Accelerated filer � Non accelerated filer � (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company � Emerging growth company � If an emerging growth company, indicated by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. � Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes � No The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $868,700,000 based upon the closing price reported for such date on The Nasdaq Global Select Market. As of January 31, 2018, 110,220,424 and 35,964,409 shares of Class A and Class B common stock were outstanding, respectively. 1 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), to be filed within 120 days of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, are incorporated by reference in Part II and Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except with respect to information specifically incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 2 GoPro, Inc. Index PART I Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures PART II Market for the Company’s Common Shares, Related Shareholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Consolidated Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information PART III Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accounting Fees and Services Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules PART IV Form 10-K Summary Signatures 3 Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Item 15. Item 16. Page 4 12 34 34 34 36 36 38 39 59 60 93 93 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 97 98 PART I Special note regarding forward-looking statements This Annual Report on Form 10-K of GoPro, Inc. (GoPro or we or the Company) includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding guidance, industry prospects, product and marketing plans, or future results of operations or financial position, made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward- looking. To identify forward-looking statements, we use words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “intend,” “target,” “goal,” “plan,” or variations of such words and similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their date. If any of management’s assumptions prove incorrect or should unanticipated circumstances arise, the Company’s actual results could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. The differences could be caused by a number of factors or combination of factors including, but not limited to, those factors identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements include plans to expand and improve product offerings in Item 1. Business and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, projections of results of operations, and any discussion of the trends and other factors that drive our business and future results in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K including but not limited to Item 1A. Risk Factors. Readers are strongly encouraged to consider the foregoing when evaluating any forward-looking statements concerning the Company. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect future events or developments. Item 1. Business Overview GoPro is enabling the way people capture and share their lives from a perspective only achieved with a GoPro. What began as an idea to help athletes document themselves engaged in sport, GoPro has become a mobile storytelling solution that helps the world share itself through immersive content. To date, our cameras and mountable and wearable accessories have generated substantially all of our revenue. We sell our products globally through retailers, wholesale distributors, and on our website. Our product offerings include the following: • HERO5 and HERO6 are our cloud-connected line of cameras launched in Fall 2016 and Fall 2017, respectively, featuring image stabilization, telemetry, cloud connectivity and voice control. Our HERO6 Black camera is powered by GoPro's custom-designed GP1 processor and is the most powerful and performance featured GoPro camera to date. We offer many professional-grade features with our current good-better-best camera offerings, which includes our HERO5 Session, HERO5 Black and HERO6 Black cameras, respectively. These cameras feature automatic uploading capabilities for photos and videos to GoPro Plus, our premium cloud-based storage solution. • Fusion is our waterproof spherical camera which captures a 360-degree perspective and launched in November 2017. Using our GoPro App on iOS, a mobile user can view live preview shots, stitch, trim and share content directly from their mobile device. Using the mobile OverCapture feature allows the iOS user to re-frame and save traditional fixed-perspective videos “punched out” or extracted from a 360-degree video source file. • GoPro Plus is a cloud-based storage solution that enables subscribers to easily access, edit and share content. Beginning in 2018, the subscription service also includes camera replacement. Our HERO5 and HERO6 cameras can automatically upload new photos and videos to a subscriber’s GoPro Plus cloud account. • Quik is our primary mobile editing app that makes it simple to create stunning edits on a smartphone. Our Quik desktop app provides expanded editing options for power users. • GoPro App is a mobile app that allows users to preview and play back photos and videos, control their GoPro cameras and share content on the fly using their smartphones. Included in the GoPro App is GoPro 4 QuikStories, a mobile experience that seamlessly copies a user's GoPro photos and video clips to his or her smartphone and transforms them into a ready-to-share video. GoPro QuikStories makes it simple to automatically create shareable video edits complete with music, effects and transitions. • Karma Grip is a handheld or body-mountable camera stabilizer that makes it easy to capture zero-shake, smooth video. • Karma Drone is our foldable drone and stabilization solution, which will be discontinued in 2018 after we sell our remaining inventory. We also offer a full ecosystem of mountable and wearable accessories. See Products below for additional information. We believe our investments in hardware, cloud and mobile solutions have yielded a solid foundational experience for consumers that we will continue to build upon in 2018. Our strategy Helping our consumers capture and share experiences is at the core of our business. We are committed to developing solutions that create an easy, seamless experience for consumers to capture, create and enjoy engaging personal content. When consumers use our products and services, they often generate content that organically increases awareness for GoPro, driving a virtuous cycle and a self-reinforcing demand for our products. We believe revenue growth will be driven by the introduction of new cameras, accessories, software applications, subscription offerings and value-driven pricing. We believe new camera features drive a replacement cycle among existing users and attract new users, expanding our total addressable market. Key components of our 2018 strategy and beyond include the following: Drive profitability through improved efficiency, lower costs and better execution. We incurred material operating losses in 2017 and 2016 and our future success will depend in part upon our ability to manage our operating expenses effectively. In 2017 and 2016, we implemented company-wide restructurings of our business resulting in global reductions-in-force, the elimination of several high-cost initiatives (including the closure of our entertainment group and our exit from the aerial market) and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities around the globe in order to improve efficiencies, lower costs and focus our resources on our hardware and software integrated storytelling solution. (See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below for information regarding restructuring charges in 2017 and 2016.) The actions taken reduced our 2017 operating expenses by $286.9 million from 2016 and we expect the actions will further reduce our operating expenses in 2018 when compared to 2017. Strengthen our analytics and understanding of customer behavior to enable better business planning. To better manage and improve the predictability of our business, GoPro will commit more resources to generating and triangulating data on consumer behavior. We believe improved data analytics could help us design better products and services with a pricing strategy that provides the best value for our consumers. Launch products that broaden GoPro’s appeal at all price points, with greater emphasis on new customers. Our data shows that once consumers enter GoPro’s product ecosystem, many become repeat purchasers, upgrading to our newest products with enhanced features or purchasing other products at compelling price points. In an effort to attract new consumers into the ecosystem, we plan to design and market easy-to-use products and services that will appeal directly to entry-level consumers and help them upgrade to other GoPro products. Increase our investment in marketing to grow our brand and attract new customers globally. In 2018, GoPro will focus its marketing investments on the biggest opportunities for capturing a larger market and growing category share in digital imaging. Our marketing strategy will include more support for entry and mid-level products that attract new consumers and introduce them to GoPro’s good-better-best product strategy. We also plan to tightly align marketing investment to create awareness and better capitalize on the launches of new products and services as well as through key sales events. We believe that international markets continue to represent a significant growth opportunity for GoPro. Revenue from outside the United States comprised 55%, 53% and 52% of our revenue in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We believe our continued investments in innovative and easy-to-use cameras, localization of voice and contextual language, and intuitive and simple 5 software tools and services, will enable us to expand our user base to a broader group of international consumers. We plan to increase our presence globally through the active promotion of our brand, the creation and cultivation of regional strategic and marketing partnerships, the expansion of localized products in international markets with region specific marketing, and an investment focus on the biggest opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region. Focus on our ecosystem of camera, app and cloud experiences. Our strategy is to make the smartphone central to the GoPro experience, eliminating the pain points involved in managing content, and producing and sharing immersive experiences. Our cloud-connected HERO5 and HERO6 cameras, GoPro Plus service and apps work together to enable an ecosystem that allows users to capture, edit and share those experiences on a mobile device and easily back-up the content in the cloud. We believe HERO5 and HERO6’s auto-upload and voice control features provide game-changing experiences for consumers that we intend to continue to build upon with our next-generation cameras. Our Quik editing app and GoPro App enable users to quickly produce high- quality videos that are fun to create and easy to share across multiple platforms. We expect to continue to enhance our software and services offerings, including solutions that automate editing on-the-go and improve and simplify content transfer from GoPro cameras to mobile devices. We remain focused on making the smartphone a key component in the GoPro user experience. Expand the value proposition of our subscription offerings to attract new consumers and engage our global user base. GoPro’s subscription service, Plus, was launched in 2016 and offered cloud storage, expanded editing solutions and more. Since then, Plus has become a quiet success attracting more than 130,000 paying subscribers. In February 2018, we relaunched Plus to include camera replacement, mobile upload, expanded cloud storage for videos and unlimited storage for photos. With significantly enhanced offerings and marketing support, we aim to grow our subscription business in 2018 by attracting new users and more deeply engaging our large consumer base. Another priority for growing our business is to attract, engage and retain top talent. In every area of our company, we want employees committed to growing GoPro through great ideas and innovation. We plan to do this by leveraging our strong brand recognition, unique culture, competitive compensation and benefits as well as our strong commitment to our Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging initiative. GoPro’s culture has been central to our ability to attract top talent. We hope to maintain this with events and programs that engage our people such as Opportunity Lab which offers workshops on topics such as public speaking and career growth. Similarly, our Live It initiative encourages employees to dedicate time each week to use GoPro products, and produce and share photos and videos of their experiences. Competitive compensation, growth opportunities, engaging programs and fun are essential elements of GoPro’s employment brand. In addition to the key components of our 2018 strategy and beyond, we will seek to leverage our brand strength and product expertise to drive a hardware upgrade cycle for our users, opportunistically enter complementary new device categories and continue to develop spherical-capture/virtual reality products. With our robust ecosystem of mounts and accessories, GoPro products allow our users to live the moment they wish to capture without having to step outside of that moment to capture it. Products Cameras. We offer a good-better-best camera line-up that includes the cloud connected HERO5 Session, HERO5 Black and HERO6 Black cameras. We also offer Fusion, our new 360-degree spherical camera. HERO5 Session, HERO5 Black, HERO6 Black and Fusion cameras are waterproof (without a housing), come with select mounting accessories, and have built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth providing connectivity with a mobile device to enable remote control, content viewing, editing and sharing functionality. Our HERO5 Black and HERO6 Black cameras can shoot in 4K at 30 and 60 frames per second, respectively, and Fusion shoots in 5.2K at 30 frames per second in 360-degrees. All of our current cameras feature multi-language voice control, electronic image stabilization, simplified controls, and the ability to auto-upload photos and videos to our cloud subscription solution, GoPro Plus, via Wi-Fi for easy access and editing with our apps. HERO5 Black, HERO6 Black and Fusion also feature GPS and additional sensors that capture location, elevation, speed and G-force loads. Mounts and accessories. We offer a wide range of mounts and accessories, either bundled with a camera or 6 sold separately, that enhance the functionality and versatility of our products, and enable our consumers to capture their experiences during a variety of activities or moments, and from different viewpoints. Our equipment- based mounts, include helmet, handlebar, roll bar and tripod mounts. Our 3-way mount is a 3-in-1 mount that can be used as a camera grip, extension arm or tripod, and our floating mounts such as the Handler, and Bite mounts + Floaty, allow our cameras to float in water. We also enable consumers to wear mounts on their bodies with the use of our wrist housing, chest harness and head strap. Additionally, we offer spare batteries, charging accessories and cables to connect our GoPro cameras to television monitors, flotation devices, dive filters and anti-fogging solutions. Our accessories expand the features, versatility and convenience of our cameras. Applications. We offer mobile and desktop applications to all consumers at no charge that help our users manage, edit, view and share their content. Our GoPro App allows users to preview and play back shots, control their GoPro and download and share content on the fly using their smartphones. With the Quik mobile app, users can automatically create and share videos from their smartphone content or from their GoPro Plus account. With QuikStories, content transforms into a seamless video automatically, utilizing machine learning and computer vision to pick and frame the footage. Quik for desktop automatically imports content from a GoPro camera and makes it simple for users to create awe-inspiring videos synced to music with just a few clicks of the mouse. Our GoPro App allows users to preview and play back shots, control their GoPro camera and share content on the fly using their smartphones. The GoPro VR app allows users to explore exciting virtual reality experiences on their smartphone. Services. GoPro Plus is a cloud-based subscription service that offers a range of premium benefits to our consumers, including camera replacement, easy auto-upload from a GoPro camera to the cloud for on-the-go access, editing and sharing using a smartphone and the Quik app, an expanded library of soundtracks, premium support, and exclusive discounts on mounts and accessories. We had approximately 130,000 paying subscribers as of January 31, 2018. GoPro Care is a fee-based service that offers a range of support options to our consumers, including extended warranty and accidental damage coverage. Revenue earned to date from GoPro Plus and GoPro Care was not material to our results in 2017. Image stabilization. The Karma Grip, which we offer as a standalone accessory, is a handheld, body-mountable 3-axis camera stabilizer that makes it easy to capture zero-shake, smooth video. Drone. The Karma drone features a compact design that fits in a small backpack, and the drone is flown using a game-style controller with an integrated touch display. The Karma drone will be phased out in 2018. We will continue to service and support Karma drones over the next several years. Seasonality Historically, we have experienced our highest levels of revenue in the fourth quarter of the year, coinciding with the holiday shopping season, particularly in the United States and Europe. While we have implemented operational changes aimed at reducing the impact of fourth quarter seasonality, on full year performance, timely and effective product introductions, marketing and forecasting, whether just prior to the holiday season or otherwise, are critical to our operations and financial performance. Segment information and geographic data We operate as one reportable segment. Financial information about geographic areas is presented in Note 12 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Backlog We do not believe that backlog information is material or meaningful as of any particular date or indicative of future sales, as our customers can change or cancel orders with limited or no penalty and limited advance notice prior to shipment. Research and development We are passionate about developing new and innovative products that inspire our consumers and enhance our brand. We are constantly innovating to deliver better performance, expanded functionality and increased convenience to enhance the appeal of our products. Our software application development focuses on convenient 7 and seamless content management, editing and sharing. We strive to remain a market leader by consistently introducing innovative products, software and services that offer optimal performance at affordable price points. We have a user experience-driven approach to product development and our CEO leads product design. By engaging with customers, consumers and opinion leaders in our core markets around the world, our development team strives to introduce meaningful and empowering new features that expand the versatility and performance of our products. We also benefit from input received from our in-house production team, our sponsored athletes and our brand advocates that regularly travel the world capturing content using our products. We believe leveraging this input will help refine our existing products and influence future products that give us a competitive advantage. The engineering team supports the development of cameras, related mounts and accessories, firmware and software. The hardware engineering team is responsible for developing technologies to support the concepts developed by our product team. These core technologies include GoPro's custom designed GP1 processor, which allows cameras to perform advanced image computation and provides unparalleled image quality and next-level image stabilization, new image silicon processors, image sensors and lenses, as well as the core algorithms that enable the systems to operate and provide optimal performance and features. The hardware engineering team also integrates these innovations and firmware into our product designs and develops our cameras, mounts and accessories. The software engineering team develops applications that enhance the functionality of our products and facilitate the management, editing, sharing and viewing of content. These applications are being developed for mobile, desktop and web-based platforms, and powered by server-side services. The core technologies include rendering engines to enable video editing, video encoding and decoding for smooth playback and algorithms for moment identification. Our research and development expenses were $229.3 million, $358.9 million and $241.7 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Manufacturing, logistics and fulfillment Our products are designed and developed in the United States, France, China and Romania, and a significant majority of our manufacturing is outsourced to contract manufacturers located in China, Japan and Malaysia. We believe that using outsourced manufacturing enables greater scale and flexibility than establishing our own manufacturing facilities. Our strategic commodities team manages the pricing and supply of the key components of our cameras, including digital signal processors, sensors and lenses. Several key strategic parts are purchased from suppliers by us and then consigned to our manufacturers, while the vast majority of parts are procured directly by our contract manufacturers. We seek to use our commodities team to achieve competitive pricing on the largest value-add components and leverage our contract manufacturers’ volume purchases for best pricing on common parts. We have third-party fulfillment centers in California, Netherlands, Hong Kong and Singapore that deliver our products from multiple locations worldwide. These facilities are either warehouse/fulfillment centers or full-service postponement centers (that perform light assembly in addition to warehouse/fulfillment). In addition, we have third-party centers in California and China that perform in-region final packaging services. Cameras and drones are typically air freighted while accessories and packaging are generally regionally procured or shipped via ocean freighter from our manufacturers to these fulfillment centers, where the products are packaged for retail sale. Our fulfillment strategy allows us to reduce shipping costs, reduce custom levies, customize products for local languages and improve inventory flexibility. Sales channels and customers We offer our products in over 30,000 retail outlets and in over 100 countries through our direct sales channel and indirectly through our distribution channel. In 2017 and 2016, our direct sales accounted for 54% and 55% of our revenue, respectively, and our distributors accounted for 46% and 45% of our revenue, respectively. Direct sales We sell directly to most of our retailers in the United States, some of our retailers in Europe and directly to consumers around the world through our e-commerce channels, as described below. 8 Independent specialty retailers. We use a network of location-based independent manufacturer representatives to sell our products to independent specialty retailers in the United States focused on sports and consumer activity capture markets. Our representatives provide highly personalized service to these retailers, including in- store merchandising, taking orders and providing clinics to educate retail sales personnel about GoPro products and services. We also have an internal, regionally focused sales team that provides a secondary level of service to both the independent specialty retailers and manufacturer representatives. Independent specialty retailers generally carry our higher end products, targeting their core customers who we believe tend to be early adopters of new technologies. Independent specialty retailers outside of the United States represent a similarly important sales channel for us, and we reach these customers indirectly through our network of international distributors. Big box retailers. We sell to large retailers with a national presence, including Amazon.com, Inc., Best Buy, Inc., Target Corporation and Wal-Mart, Inc. We support these retailers with a dedicated and experienced sales management team that we believe enables us to reduce channel conflict. Mid-market retailers. We also sell to retailers with a large regional or national presence, often focused on specific verticals such as consumer electronics, sporting goods, military, hunting and fishing, and motor sports. In the U.S., we sell directly to these mid-market retailers through our experienced sales teams assigned to particular accounts and regions. e-commerce channel. We sell our full line of products to consumers around the world through our online store at gopro.com, which we market through online and offline advertising. Sales through gopro.com were less than 10% of our total revenue for 2017, 2016 and 2015. Distribution We sell to over 55 distributors who resell our products to retailers in international markets and to certain specific verticals in the United States. We have dedicated sales personnel focused on providing a high level of service to these distributors, including assisting with product mix planning, channel marketing and in-store merchandising, development of marketing materials, order assistance and educating the distributors’ sales personnel about GoPro products. In-store merchandising Our in-store merchandising strategy focuses on our iconic GoPro-branded, video-enabled point of purchase (POP) merchandising displays that are located in nearly all retail outlets where our products are sold. These displays showcase GoPro videos and present our product ecosystem in a customer-friendly manner. Our larger retailers help us represent a broader range of GoPro products due to their in-store deployment of our larger and custom POP displays. We have been successful working with our retailers to further expand the footprint of our POP displays within existing stores. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had approximately 29,000 POP displays in retail outlets worldwide. Marketing and advertising Our marketing and advertising programs are focused on engaging consumers by exposing them to compelling GoPro content and educating them about new hardware features as well as the power of our solutions for software editing (Quik mobile and desktop) and content management (GoPro Plus). We believe this approach enhances our brand while demonstrating the performance, durability and versatility of our products. Our marketing and advertising efforts span a wide range of consumer interests and leverage both traditional consumer marketing and lifestyle marketing strategies. Consumer marketing. Social media plays an important role in our consumer marketing strategy. Our consumers capture and share personal GoPro content on social media and content sharing platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Twitter, Vimeo and YouTube. GoPro content was viewed approximately 700 million times on social media platforms in 2017, up more than 25% year-over-year. In 2017, we gained almost 4.8 million new followers to our social accounts for a lifetime total of 35 million followers. Of the 4.8 million new followers on our social accounts, 3 million were on Instagram, resulting in a lifetime total of 15 million on Instagram. Our total Instagram followers reached 15 million at the end of 2017. To date, we have reached 1.8 billion views on YouTube. We also integrate user-generated content and GoPro originally produced content into advertising campaigns across various platforms including television, print, online, billboards and other out of home 9 advertising, and at consumer and trade facing events. This content also supports our in-store channel marketing efforts, appearing on our POP displays and other in-store marketing materials. We continue to believe GoPro content remains a significant asset that builds awareness for our brand and products. Lifestyle marketing. Our lifestyle marketing programs focus on expanding GoPro brand awareness by engaging consumers through relationships with key influencers, event promotions and other outreach efforts. We cultivate strong relationships with influential athletes, celebrities, entertainers and brands, all of whom use our products to create and share engaging content with their own fans and consumers. We also work directly with these partners to create compelling content that we leverage to our mutual benefit across the GoPro Network, a collection of GoPro Channels hosted on a variety of online destinations and partner platforms. Competition The market for cameras is highly competitive and characterized by frequent product introductions and rapid technological advances. We believe the principal competitive factors impacting the market for our products include quality, reliability and user experience, price and performance, design innovation, brand recognition, marketing and distribution capability, service and support, and brand reputation. We compete against established, well-known camera manufacturers such as Canon Inc., Fujifilm Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Olympus Corporation and Vivitar Corporation, as well as large, diversified electronics companies such as, Panasonic Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co. and Sony Corporation and specialty companies such as Garmin Ltd. We believe we compete favorably with these companies’ products. Our durable and versatile product design facilitates increased functionality and wearability and we offer a variety of mounts and other accessories that enable a wide range of consumer use cases that are difficult for other competing products to address. Further, we offer many professional-grade features within our camera and spherical product offerings at attractive consumer price points, including our superview mode, which allows a user to capture an immersive wide-angle perspective, super high-resolution video capability, voice control features, image stabilization, and OverCapture, which allows a Fusion user to capture content from every angle. We also provide users with a suite of free mobile and desktop applications that enhance the overall GoPro experience. Moreover, we believe we have achieved significant brand recognition in our target vertical markets. We believe our years of experience working with active and influential consumers contributes to our ability to develop attractive products and establishes the authenticity of our brand, thereby differentiating us from current and potential competitors. Smartphones and tablets with photo and video functionality have significantly displaced the market for traditional camera sales, and the makers of those devices also have mobile and other content editing applications and storage for content captured with those devices. Our Quik mobile and desktop editing applications, our GoPro App and our GoPro Plus service may not be as compelling a solution as those offered by other companies, such as Apple, Inc. and Google, although the Quik mobile application supports content from other platforms including content from Apple and Android. Also, it is possible that, in the future, the manufacturers of such devices, such as Apple, Google and Samsung, may continue to design them for use in a range of conditions, including challenging physical environments, or develop products with features similar to ours. In addition, new companies may emerge and offer competitive products directly in our category. 10 Intellectual property Intellectual property is an important aspect of our business, and our practice is to seek protection for our intellectual property as appropriate. Our trademarks, including “GOPRO,” “HERO,” “SESSION,” and “KARMA,” and the GoPro logos, among others, are a critical component of the value of our business. In addition, we hold many issued and pending utility and design patents for innovations that help our consumers capture, create and share their content using our cameras, drones, mounts, accessories and software. Our patents cover areas that include physical structures, image processing, operational firmware and software, post-processing software, distribution software, mount and accessory structures, as well as the ornamental aspects of our hardware and software products. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 369 issued patents and 441 patent applications pending in the United States, and 229 corresponding issued patents and 153 patent applications pending in foreign countries. Our issued U.S. patents will expire approximately between 2024 and 2036 and our issued foreign patents will expire approximately between 2022 and 2042. We cannot be certain that our patent applications will be issued or that any issued patents will provide us with any competitive advantage or will not be challenged by third parties. We continually review our development efforts to assess our innovations, including their patentability. We take active measures to protect our intellectual property against unauthorized third-party use, including misuse of our patents, copyrights, trademarks and other proprietary rights. In addition to the foregoing protections, we generally control access to and use of our proprietary and other confidential information through the use of internal and external controls, including contractual protections in agreements with employees, contract manufacturers, distributors and others. Despite these protections, we may be unable to prevent third parties from using our intellectual property without our authorization, breaching any nondisclosure agreements with us, or independently developing products that are similar to ours, particularly in those countries where the laws do not protect our proprietary and intellectual property rights as fully as in the United States. Employees As of December 31, 2017, we had 1,273 employees. None of our employees are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we have experienced no work stoppages. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. In January 2018, we implemented a company-wide restructuring of our business resulting in a global reduction in force to reduce our employee headcount below 1,000 employees by the end of 2018. Corporate and available information We were incorporated as Woodman Labs, Inc. in California and began doing business as GoPro in February 2004. We reincorporated in Delaware in December 2011 and in February 2014 we changed our name to GoPro, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 3000 Clearview Way, San Mateo, California 94402, and our telephone number is (855) 636-3578. We completed our initial public offering in July 2014 and our Class A common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “GPRO.” Our Class B common stock is not listed nor traded on any stock exchange. We have registered and applied to register a number of trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the trademark offices of other countries including “GOPRO,” “HERO,” “KARMA,” “SESSION and the GoPro logos. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also includes references to trademarks and service marks of other entities, and those trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners. Our website address is www.gopro.com. Through a link on the Investor Relations section of our website, we make available the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC): our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. All such filings are available free of charge. The information posted on our website is not incorporated into this report. Further, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is located at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov. 11 Item 1A. Risk Factors You should carefully consider the risks described below and all other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition, cash flows and operating results could be materially and adversely affected if any of the following risks, or other risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we currently think are immaterial, actually occur. In that event, the trading price of our shares may decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment. Risks related to our business and industry We may not be able to achieve revenue growth or profitability in the future. Since 2015, our revenue has declined in each of the two succeeding years. Our historical results should not be considered as indicative of our future performance. For example, our annual revenue grew rapidly from $985.7 million in 2013 to $1.62 billion in 2015 and then declined to $1.185 billion and $1.18 billion in 2016 and 2017, respectively. In future periods, we could continue to experience declines in revenue, or revenue could grow more slowly than we expect, which could have a material negative effect on our future operating results. In addition, we incurred substantial operating losses of $163.5 million and $373.0 million for full year 2017 and 2016, respectively, as compared to operating income of $54.7 million for full year 2015. Lower levels of revenue or higher levels of operating expense investment in future periods may result in additional losses or limited profitability. In the first quarter of 2018, we implemented a company-wide restructuring of our business resulting in a reduction in our global workforce and the elimination of certain open positions, as well as the elimination of several high-cost initiatives, including the closure of our aerial business, in order to focus our resources on our camera business. We previously implemented company-wide restructurings of our business in the first quarter of 2016, fourth quarter of 2016 and the first quarter of 2017, including the closure of our entertainment group in order to focus our resources on our hardware and software integrated storytelling solution, and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. We may not realize the cost savings expected from these actions. We may continue to incur significant losses in the future for a number of reasons, including other risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, and we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors. Our future growth depends in part on further penetrating our total addressable market, and we may not be successful in doing so. Our growth historically has largely been fueled by the adoption of our products by people looking to self-capture images of themselves participating in exciting physical activities. We believe that our future growth depends on continuing to reach and expand our core community of users, followers and fans, and then utilizing that energized community as brand ambassadors to an extended community. We believe that in order to expand our market, we must provide both innovative and easy-to-use products, as well as intuitive and simple software tools that enable effortless sharing of content, with the smartphone central to the GoPro experience. We believe our subscription offerings will increase our total addressable market through our e-commerce platform, but we cannot be certain that these efforts will be successful. We may not be able to expand our market through this strategy on a timely basis, or at all, and we may not be successful in providing tools that our users adopt or believe are easy to use. In the third quarter of 2017, we began shipping our newest cloud connected camera, HERO6 Black, which is powered by GoPro’s custom designed GP1 processor and released updated versions of our GoPro and Quik mobile applications. We plan to further build upon our integrated storytelling solution in future periods, and our investments in this solution, including marketing and advertising expenses, may not successfully drive increased sales of our products and our users may not adopt our new offerings. If we are not successful in broadening our user base with our integrated solution, our future revenue growth will be negatively affected and we may not recognize benefits from our investments in the various components of our storytelling solution and the marketing, sales and advertising costs to promote our solution. Our growth also depends on expanding our market with new capture perspectives, including spherical, which is a resource-intensive initiative in a highly competitive market. While we are investing resources, including in software development, sales and marketing, to reach these expanded and new consumer markets, we cannot be assured 12 that we will be successful in doing so. If we are not successful in penetrating additional markets, we might not be able to grow our revenue and we may not recognize benefits from our investment in new areas. For example, we made significant investments in the aerial market, but recently decided to close our aerial group in light of difficult market conditions and margin challenges. Moving forward, we expect to sell our remaining inventory of Karma drones, which may not be successful, depending on consumer demand for a product that is end of life. To remain competitive and stimulate consumer demand, we must effectively manage product introductions, product transitions, product pricing and marketing. We believe that we must continually develop and introduce new products, enhance our existing products and effectively stimulate customer demand for new and upgraded products to maintain or increase our revenue. The success of new product introductions depends on a number of factors including, but not limited to, timely and successful research and development, pricing, market and consumer acceptance, the effective forecasting and management of product demand, purchase commitments and inventory levels, the availability of products in appropriate quantities to meet anticipated demand, the ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of components for our new products from third-party suppliers, the management of any changes in major component suppliers, the management of manufacturing and supply costs, the management of risks associated with new product production ramp-up issues, and the risk that new products may have quality issues or other defects or bugs in the early stages of introduction. With respect to management and supply costs, we may be impacted by an overall worldwide increase in demand for memory products and potential allocations for such products, in addition to pricing pressure on commodity supplies such as batteries or memory. Such supply shortages may affect our ability to manage appropriate supply levels of our products and pricing pressures may negatively affect our gross margins. For example, in Fall 2016, we experienced production issues that resulted in delayed unit shipments of our HERO5 Black camera in the third and fourth quarters of 2016. In addition, in November 2016, we announced the withdrawal of all Karma drones after we discovered that some Karma units lost power during operation. As a result of these issues, our revenues and operating results for the second half of 2016 were negatively affected. The Karma drone was re-launched and available for sale domestically in February 2017 and distribution in international markets began at the end of March 2017. Subsequently, in January 2018 we announced the closure of our aerial business and will sell through our remaining inventory of Karma drones throughout 2018. In addition, the introduction or announcement of new products or product enhancements may shorten the life cycle of our existing products or reduce demand for our current products, thereby offsetting any benefits of successful product introductions and potentially lead to challenges in managing inventory of existing products. For example, the introduction of the HERO6 Black camera at $499, while keeping the price point of the HERO5 Black camera at $399, negatively affected consumer demand for HERO5 Black, and we ultimately reduced the price of HERO5 Black to increase channel sell through rates. The HERO5 Black price adjustment had a cascading effect that resulted in price reductions for HERO5 Session and ultimately HERO6 Black cameras. Reduced product margins resulting from lower pricing may decrease the number of retailers willing to offer and promote our product lineup. Failure to manage and complete product transitions effectively or in a timely manner could harm our brand and lead to, among other things, lower revenue, excess prior generation product inventory, or a deficit of new product inventory and reduced profitability. For example, as a result of reducing the price of our HERO5 Black cameras in December 2017, we incurred price protection charges which led to a reduction in our product margins. Additionally, our brand and product marketing efforts are critical to stimulating consumer demand. We market our products globally through a range of advertising and promotional programs and campaigns, including social media. If we do not successfully market our products, the lack of success or increased costs of promotional programs could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We depend on sales of our cameras, mounts and accessories for substantially all of our revenue, and any decrease in the sales or change in sales mix of these products would harm our business. We expect to derive the substantial majority of our revenue from sales of cameras, mounts and accessories for the foreseeable future. A decline in the price or unit demand for these products, whether due to macroeconomic conditions, competition or otherwise, or our inability to increase sales of these products, would harm our business and operating results more seriously than it would if we derived significant revenue from a variety of product lines 13 and services. In particular, a decline in the price or unit demand of our top-selling HERO5 and HERO6 Black cameras or our inability to increase sales of these products, could materially harm our business and operating results. While we have developed and released products and services to add to our offerings, we may not be successful in achieving future revenue growth driven by newly released products and services. For example, concurrently with our HERO6 Black camera launch, we highlighted QuikStories, our integrated storytelling solution to make editing and sharing content from our HERO5 and HERO6 cameras easier for our users. If all the components of the storytelling solution do not work together seamlessly or our users do not adopt them, they may not drive camera sales and our operating results could be adversely affected. In addition, we recently announced our new spherical camera, Fusion, and continue to expend resources to develop editing and sharing software to deliver and experience spherical content. If the software does not function as expected or users do not adopt our solution, sales of our spherical camera may be negatively affected. We cannot be assured that our investments in the development of software-related products and services will result in either increased revenue or profit. Changes in product mix may harm our financial results. If there is a shift in consumer demand from our higher- priced to lower-priced cameras without a corresponding increase in units sold, our revenues and gross profit could decrease. As a result, our future growth and financial performance may continue to depend heavily on our ability to develop and sell enhanced versions of our cameras, mounts and accessories. If we fail to deliver product enhancements, new releases or new products and services that appeal to consumers, our future financial condition, operating results and cash flows will be materially affected. Product introductions may not always be successful and could be costly to develop and exit if ultimately unsuccessful. For example, we invested significant resources in development, marketing and support for the launch of our Karma drone, which we subsequently determined faced margin challenges and other obstacles, and we began exiting the aerial business in the first quarter of 2018. We rely on third-party suppliers, some of which are sole-source suppliers, to provide components for our products. Our ability to meet customer demand depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of components for our products. All of the components that go into the manufacturing of our cameras and accessories are sourced from third-party suppliers, and some of these components are provided by a single supplier or by a supplier that could potentially become a competitor. If we lose access to components from a particular supplier or experience a significant disruption in the supply of products and components from a current supplier, we may be unable to locate alternative suppliers of comparable quality at an acceptable price, or at all, and our business could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if we experience a significant increase in demand for our products, our suppliers might not have the capacity or elect not to meet our needs as they allocate components to other customers. Identifying a suitable supplier is an involved process that requires us to become satisfied with the supplier’s quality control, responsiveness and service, financial stability and labor and other ethical practices, and if we seek to source materials from new suppliers there can be no assurance that we could do so in a manner that does not disrupt the manufacture and sale of our products. Our reliance on single source, or a small number of, suppliers involves a number of additional risks, including risks related to: supplier capacity constraints; price increases; timely delivery; component quality; failure of a key supplier to remain in business and adjust to market conditions; delays in, or the inability to execute on, a supplier roadmap for components and technologies; and natural disasters, fire, acts of terrorism or other catastrophic events. In particular, for our camera designs we incorporate image processors, sensors, lens and memory solutions that critically impact the performance of our products. These components have unique performance profiles, and, as a result, it is not commercially practical to support multiple sources for these components for our products. For example, we incorporate video compression and image processing semiconductors from Ambarella, Inc. in our HERO5 cameras and we incorporate the GP1 image signal processor from Socionext, Inc. in our HERO6 Black camera. We do not currently have alternative suppliers for several key components. In the event that any of our key suppliers are unable to supply the components that we need to produce our products to meet anticipated customer demand, our business would be materially and adversely affected. 14 If we are unable to anticipate consumer preferences and successfully develop desirable products and solutions, we might not be able to maintain or increase our revenue and achieve profitability. Our success depends on our ability to identify and originate product trends as well as to anticipate, gauge and react to changing consumer demands in a timely manner. All of our products are subject to changing consumer preferences that cannot be predicted with certainty and lead times for our products may make it more difficult for us to respond rapidly to new or changing product or consumer preferences. Additionally, our products are discretionary items for consumers subject to changing preferences. The overall market for consumer electronics is highly competitive and consumers may choose to spend their dollars on products or devices offered by our competitors or other consumer electronics companies instead of on GoPro products, which may adversely affect our sales. If we are unable to introduce appealing new products or novel technologies in a timely manner, or our new products or technologies are not accepted or adopted by consumers, our competitors may increase their market share, which could hurt our competitive position. Our research and development efforts are complex and require us to incur substantial expenses to support the development of our next generation cameras, editing applications and other new products and services. Our research and development expense was $229.3 million, $358.9 million and $241.7 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We expect that our research and development expenses will continue to be substantial in 2018, but less than expense levels incurred in 2017 as a result of recent cost management measures and our exit of the aerial market. Our more limited research and development investment in 2018 may require us to forego investment in certain products or features which might have been successful and we may not choose the right features, products, or services to update or enhance. Unanticipated problems in developing products could also divert substantial resources, which may impair our ability to develop new products and enhancements of existing products, and could further increase our costs. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2016, we diverted resources to investigate and resolve an issue related to our Karma drone after discovering that some Karma units lost power during operation, an issue that was resolved and shipments of Karma resumed in February 2017. We may not be able to achieve an acceptable return, if any, on our research and development efforts, and our business may be adversely affected. As we continually seek to enhance our products, we will incur additional costs to incorporate new or revised features. We might not be able to, or determine that it is not in our interests to, raise prices to compensate for any additional costs. We operate in a highly competitive market and the size and resources of some of our competitors may allow them to compete more effectively than we can, which could result in a loss of our market share and a decrease in our revenue and profitability. The market for cameras is highly competitive. Further, competition has intensified as existing competitors have introduced new and more competitive offerings alongside their existing products, and as market entrants have introduced new products into our markets. Increased competition and changing consumer preferences may result in pricing pressures, reduced profit margins and may impede our ability to continue to increase the sales of our products or cause us to lose market share, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operations. We compete against established, well-known camera manufacturers such as Canon Inc., Fujifilm Corporation, Nikon Corporation, Olympus Corporation and Vivitar Corporation, as well as large, diversified electronics companies such as, Panasonic Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co. and Sony Corporation and specialty companies such as Garmin Ltd. Many of our current competitors have substantial market share, diversified product lines, well-established supply and distribution systems, strong worldwide brand recognition and greater financial, marketing, research and development and other resources than we do. Many of our existing and potential competitors enjoy substantial competitive advantages, such as longer operating histories; the capacity to leverage their sales efforts and marketing expenditures across a broader portfolio of products; broader distribution and established relationships with channel partners; access to larger established customer bases; greater resources to make acquisitions; larger intellectual property portfolios; and the ability to bundle competitive offerings with other products and services. Further, new companies may emerge and offer competitive products. We are aware that certain companies have developed cameras designed and packaged to appear similar to our products, which may confuse consumers or distract consumers from purchasing GoPro products. 15 Moreover, smartphones and tablets with photo and video functionality have significantly displaced the market for traditional cameras, and the makers of those devices also have mobile and other content editing applications and storage for content captured with those devices. Our Quik mobile and desktop editing applications, GoPro mobile application and our GoPro Plus service may not be as compelling a solution as those offered by other companies, such as Apple, Inc. and Google, although the Quik mobile application supports content from other platforms including content from Apple and Google. Manufacturers of smartphones and tablets, such as Apple, Google, and Samsung may continue to design them for use in a range of conditions, including challenging physical environments, and waterproof capabilities, or develop products with features similar to ours. Additionally, the market for drones is competitive. We compete against established and start-up drone manufacturers, such as DJI Technology Co., and Parrot SA, who currently have or are attempting to gain a substantial share in the global drone market. Although we made significant investments in the aerial market, we recently decided to close our aerial group in light of difficult market conditions, low margins and regulatory challenges. Moving forward, we expect to sell through our remaining inventory of Karma drones, which may not be successful, depending on consumer demand for a product that is end of life. We depend on key personnel to operate and grow our business. If we are unable to retain, attract and integrate qualified personnel, our ability to develop and successfully grow our business could be harmed. We believe that our future success is highly dependent on the contributions of our CEO and our executive officers, as well as our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and experienced research and development, sales and marketing and other personnel in the United States and abroad. All of our employees, including our executive officers, are free to terminate their employment relationship with us at any time, and their knowledge of our business and industry may be difficult to replace. Since March 2016, we have implemented four global reductions-in-force and other restructuring actions to reduce our future operating expenses. Furthermore, in January 2018, we announced that our COO, Charles “CJ” Prober is departing the Company, and our General Counsel, Sharon Zezima, has resigned from the Company. Additionally, other senior leadership positions were impacted in the restructuring announced in January 2018. These changes, and any future changes, in our operations and management team could be disruptive to our operations. Our restructuring actions and any future restructuring actions could have an adverse effect on our business as a result of decreases in employee morale and the failure to meet operational targets due to the loss of employees. If more of our key employees leave, we may not be able to fully integrate new personnel or replicate the prior working relationships, and our operations could suffer. Qualified individuals are in high demand, and we may incur significant costs to attract and retain them. While we utilize competitive salary, bonus and long-term incentive packages to recruit new employees, many of the companies with which we compete for experienced personnel also have greater resources than we do. Competition for qualified personnel is particularly intense in the San Francisco Bay Area, where our headquarters are located. We have from time to time experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. In addition, job candidates and existing employees often consider the value of the equity awards they receive in connection with their employment. Fluctuations in the price of our Class A common stock may make it more difficult or costly to use equity compensation to motivate, incentivize and retain our employees. For example, during 2017, our closing stock price ranged from a high of $11.12 in the fourth quarter to a low of $7.24 in the first quarter. If we are unable to attract and retain highly skilled personnel, we may not be able to achieve our strategic objectives, and our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. If our sales fall below our forecasts, especially during the holiday season, our overall financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Seasonal consumer shopping patterns significantly affect our business. We have traditionally experienced greater revenue in the fourth quarter of each year due to demand related to the holiday season, and in some years, including 2017, the launch of new products heading into the holiday season. Fourth quarter revenue comprised 28%, 46% and 27% of our 2017, 2016 and 2015 revenue, respectively. Given the strong seasonal nature of our sales, appropriate forecasting is critical to our operations. We anticipate that this seasonal impact is likely to continue and any shortfalls in expected fourth quarter revenue, due to macroeconomic conditions, product release 16 patterns, a decline in the effectiveness of our promotional activities, pricing pressures, supply chain disruptions, or for any other reason, could cause our annual results of operations to suffer significantly. In addition, we typically experience lower revenue in the first half of the year. For example, revenue of $515.1 million for the first half of 2017 decreased $266.1 million, or 34.1%, sequentially from $781.2 million in the last half of 2016. First half revenue comprised 44%, 34% and 48% of our annual 2017, 2016 and 2015 revenue, respectively. In contrast, a substantial portion of our expenses are personnel-related and include salaries, stock-based compensation, benefits and incentive-based compensation plan expenses, which are not seasonal in nature. Accordingly, in the event of revenue shortfalls, we are generally unable to mitigate a negative impact on operating margins in the short term. For example, we recorded a substantial net loss for 2017 due to lower levels of revenue and higher levels of operating expense investment. To the extent such revenue shortfalls recur in future periods, our operating results would be harmed. We face substantial risks related to inventory, purchase commitments and long-lived assets, and we could incur material charges related to these items that adversely affect our operating results. To ensure adequate inventory supply and meet the demands of our retailers and distributors, we must forecast inventory needs and place orders with our contract manufacturers and component suppliers based on our estimates of future demand for particular products as well as accurately track the level of product inventory in the channel to ensure we are not in an over or under supply situation. To the extent we discontinue the manufacturing and sales of any products or services, we must manage the inventory liquidation, supplier commitments and customer expectations. For example, in the first quarter of 2018, we exited the aerial business, but still have inventory of our Karma drone, which we plan to continue to sell and support for the life of that product line. Also, in the fourth quarter of 2015, the first quarter of 2016, and the fourth quarter of 2017, we recorded product charges of $57 million, $8 million, and $5 million, respectively, for excess purchase order commitments, excess inventory, and obsolete tooling, relating to the end-of-life of our entry-level HERO product, slower than anticipated overall demand, and for excess inventory relating to the end-of-life of our REMO accessory. No assurance can be given that we will not incur additional charges in future periods related to our inventory management or that we will not underestimate or overestimate forecast sales in a future period. Our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products is affected by many factors, including product introductions by us and our competitors, channel inventory levels, unanticipated changes in general market demand, macroeconomic conditions or consumer confidence. If we do not accurately forecast customer demand for our products, we may in future periods be unable to meet customer, retailer or distributor demand for our products, or may be required to incur higher costs to secure the necessary production capacity and components, and our business and operating results could be adversely affected. If we fail to manage our operating expenses effectively, our financial performance may continue to suffer. Our success will depend in part upon our ability to manage our operating expenses effectively. We incurred significant operating losses in 2017 and 2016 and, as of December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $442.1 million. Beginning in March 2016 through the first quarter of 2018, we implemented global reductions-in- force and other restructuring actions to reduce our future operating expenses. Although we plan to seek to operate efficiently and to manage our costs effectively, we may not realize the cost savings expected from these actions. Aggregate charges for employee termination and the timing to recognize these charges and other costs associated with the restructuring, including the estimates of related cash expenditures made in connection with the restructuring, may exceed estimated and disclosed amounts and may not lead to improvements in results of operations at expected levels. We will need to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting processes and procedures and financial and business information systems. We are also investing in areas we believe will grow revenue and our operating expenses might increase as a result of these investments. If we are unable to operate efficiently and manage our costs, we may continue to incur significant losses in the future and may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability. In the future, in response to unfavorable market conditions or consumer demand, we may again need to strategically realign our resources, adjust our product line and/or enact price reductions in order to stimulate demand, and implement additional restructurings and workforce reductions. For example, in the fourth quarter of 17 2017 and first quarter of 2018, we reduced the pricing on our entire camera product line up to increase consumer demand, closed our aerial business due to unfavorable market conditions, and implemented a workforce reduction. Any such actions may result in the recording of special charges including inventory-related write-offs, or other restructuring costs. Additionally, our estimates with respect to the useful life or ultimate recoverability of our assets, including purchased intangible assets and tooling, could also change and result in impairment charges. We may not be able to secure additional financing on favorable terms, or at all, to meet our future capital needs. In the future, we may require additional capital to respond to business opportunities, challenges, acquisitions or unforeseen circumstances and may determine to engage in equity or debt financings or enter into credit facilities for other reasons. We may not be able to timely secure additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. For example, our current credit facility contains restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, and any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve further restrictive covenants, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. Further, even if we are able to obtain additional financing, we may be required to use such proceeds to repay a portion of our debt. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt or other equity-linked securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing under our credit facility, or alternative sources, when we require it, our ability to grow or support our business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited. In the event additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us or at all. An economic downturn or economic uncertainty in our key U.S. and international markets, as well as fluctuations in currency exchange rates, may adversely affect consumer discretionary spending and demand for our products. Factors affecting the level of consumer spending include general market conditions, macroeconomic conditions, tax rates, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates, and other factors such as consumer confidence, the availability and cost of consumer credit and levels of unemployment. The substantial majority of our sales occur in U.S. dollars and an increase in the value of the dollar against the Euro and other currencies could increase the real cost to consumers of our products in those markets outside the United States. For example, in countries where we sell in local currency, we are subject to exchange rate fluctuations that create inherent risks for us and may cause us to adjust pricing which may make our products more or less favorable to the consumer. If global economic conditions are volatile or if economic conditions deteriorate, consumers may delay or reduce purchases of our products resulting in consumer demand for our products that may not reach our sales targets. Strengthening of the U.S. dollar and/or weakness in the economies of Euro zone countries could adversely impact sales of our products in the European region, which would have a material negative impact on our future operating results. Our sensitivity to economic cycles and any related fluctuation in consumer demand could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Our international business operations account for a significant portion of our revenue and operating expenses and are subject to challenges and risks. Revenue from outside the United States comprised 55%, 53% and 52% of our revenue in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and we expect international revenue to continue to be significant in the future. Further, we currently have foreign operations in China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Philippines, Romania and a number of other countries in Europe and Asia. Operating in foreign countries requires significant resources and considerable management attention, and we may enter new geographic markets where we have limited or no experience in marketing, selling, and deploying our products. International expansion has required and will continue to require us to invest significant funds and other resources and we cannot be assured our efforts will be successful. International sales and operations may be subject to risks such as: • difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; • burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations, including environmental, packaging and labeling, and drone regulations; • adverse tax effects and foreign exchange controls making it difficult to repatriate earnings and cash; 18 the effect of foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates; terrorist activities and natural disasters; trade restrictions; • changes to the taxation of undistributed foreign earnings; • • political and economic instability; • • • differing employment practices and laws and labor disruptions; • • • • a legal system subject to undue influence or corruption; and • a business culture in which illegal sales practices may be prevalent. the imposition of government controls; lesser degrees of intellectual property protection; tariffs and customs duties and the classifications of our goods by applicable governmental bodies; The occurrence of any of these risks could negatively affect our international business and consequently our business, operating results and financial condition. Security breaches and other disruptions including cyber-attacks, and our actual or perceived failure to adequately protect business and consumer data and content could harm our brand and our reputation in the marketplace. In the ordinary course of our business, we electronically maintain sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers and suppliers, and some personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in our facilities and on our networks. Through GoPro Plus, users may store video and image files, including any telemetry or metadata that the user has chosen to associate with those files in the cloud. In our e-commerce services, we process, store and transmit consumer data. We also collect user data through certain marketing activities. For all of the foregoing internal and customer or consumer facing data and content collection, we collect and store that information in our or our third-party providers’ electronic systems. These systems may be targets of attacks, such as viruses, malware or phishing attempts by cyber criminals or other wrongdoers seeking to steal our users’ content or data, or our customer’s information for financial gain or to harm our business operations or reputation. The loss, misuse or compromise of such information or content may result in costly investigations, remediation efforts and costly notification to affected consumers. If such content were accessed by unauthorized third parties or deleted inadvertently by us or third parties, our brand and reputation could be adversely affected. Cyber-attacks could also adversely affect our operating results, consume internal resources, and result in litigation or potential liability for us and otherwise harm our business. Further, we are subject to general consumer regulations and laws, as well as regulations and laws specifically related to security and privacy of consumer data or content. In the event of an incident affecting the security of consumer data or content, regulators may open an investigation or pursue fines or penalties for non-compliance with these laws, or private plaintiffs may sue us, resulting in additional costs and reputational harm to our business. Any significant cybersecurity incidents or disruption of our information systems, and our reliance on Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) technologies from third parties, could adversely affect our business operations and financial results. We are increasingly dependent on information systems to process transactions, manage our supply chain and inventory, ship goods on a timely basis, maintain cost-efficient operations, complete timely and accurate financial reporting, operate our e-commerce website and respond to customer inquiries. Our information systems and those of third parties we use in our operations are vulnerable to cybersecurity risk, including cyber-attacks such as distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins that damage operating systems, and similar disruptions. For instance, in December 2017, researchers identified significant CPU architecture vulnerabilities commonly known as “Spectre” and “Meltdown” that have required software updates and patches, including for providers of public cloud services, to mitigate such vulnerabilities and such updates and patches may require servers to be offline and potentially slow their performance. Additionally, these systems periodically experience directed attacks intended to lead to interruptions and delays in our operations as well as loss, misuse or theft of data. We have implemented physical, technical and administrative safeguards to protect our systems. To date, unauthorized users have not had a material effect on our systems; however, there can be no assurance that attacks will not be successful in the future. In addition, 19 our information systems must be constantly updated, patched and upgraded to protect against known vulnerabilities and optimize performance. Material disruptions or slowdown of our systems, including a disruption or slowdown could occur if we are unable to successfully update, patch and upgrade our systems. System disruptions, failures and slowdowns, whether caused by cyber-attacks, update failures or other causes, could affect our financial systems and operations. This could cause delays in our supply chain or cause information, including data related to customer orders, to be lost or delayed which could result in delays in the delivery of merchandise to our stores and customers or lost sales, especially if the disruption or slowdown occurred during our seasonally strong fourth quarter. Any of these events could reduce demand for our products, impair our ability to complete sales through our e-commerce channels and cause our revenue to decline. If changes in technology cause our information systems to become obsolete, or if our information systems are inadequate to handle our growth, we could lose customers or our business and operating results could be adversely affected. The information systems used by our third-party service providers are vulnerable to these risks as well. In particular, we are heavily reliant on SaaS enterprise resource planning systems to conduct our order and inventory management, e-commerce and financial transactions and reporting. In addition, we utilize third-party cloud computing services in connection with our business operations. Problems faced by us or our third-party hosting/cloud computing providers, or content delivery network providers, including technological or business- related disruptions, as well as cybersecurity threats, could adversely affect our business and operating results, our ability to accurately report our financial results, as well as the experience of our consumers, which in turn could adversely affect our business and operating results. As we expand our operations, we expect to utilize additional systems and service providers that may also be essential to managing our business. Our ability to manage our business would suffer if one or more of our providers suffer an interruption in their business, or experience delays, disruptions or quality control problems in their operations, or we have to change or add systems and services. While we conduct reasonable diligence on our service providers, we may not always be able to control the quality of the systems and services we receive from these providers, which could impair our ability to maintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting and complete timely and accurate financial reporting, and may affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Any significant disruption to our e-commerce business could result in lost sales. Online sales through gopro.com represent less than 10% of our total revenue. Nonetheless, system interruptions or delays could cause potential consumers to fail to purchase our products and could harm our reputation and brand. The operation of our direct to consumer e-commerce business through gopro.com depends on the ability to maintain the efficient and uninterrupted operation of online order-taking and fulfillment operations. Our e- commerce operations subject us to certain risks that could have an adverse effect on our operating results, including risks related to the computer systems that operate our website and related support systems, such as system failures, viruses, cyberattacks, computer hackers and similar disruptions. If we or our designated third- party contractors are unable to maintain and upgrade our e-commerce website or if we encounter system interruptions or delays, our operating results could be adversely affected. We may acquire other businesses, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results. We have completed several acquisitions and may evaluate additional acquisitions of, or strategic investments in, other companies, products or technologies that we believe are complementary to our business. For example, in the first half of 2016, we acquired two mobile editing application companies for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $104 million. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates and we may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, and any acquisitions we complete could be viewed negatively by users or investors. In addition, if we fail to successfully integrate such acquisitions, or the technologies associated with such acquisitions, the revenue and operating results of the combined company could be adversely affected. Acquisitions may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert management from their primary responsibilities, subject 20 us to additional liabilities, increase our expenses and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. We may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology and accurately forecast the financial effect of an acquisition transaction, including accounting charges. We have recorded significant goodwill and intangible assets in connection with our acquisitions, and in the future, if our acquisitions do not yield expected revenue, we may be required to take material impairment charges that could adversely affect our results of operations. We may have to pay cash, incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition, each of which could affect our financial condition or the value of our capital stock. The sale of equity to finance any such acquisitions could result in dilution to our stockholders. If we incur debt it would result in increased fixed obligations and could also subject us to covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations. In addition, our future operating results may be affected by performance earnouts or contingent payments. For example, for our 2016 acquisitions, deferred cash and stock compensation was payable to certain continuing employees subject to meeting specified future employment conditions. Furthermore, acquisitions may require large one-time charges and can result in increased debt or contingent liabilities, adverse tax consequences, additional stock-based compensation expense and the recording and subsequent amortization or impairments of amounts related to certain purchased intangible assets, any of which could negatively affect our future results of operations. Our success depends on our ability to maintain the value and reputation of our brand. Our success depends on the value and reputation of our brand, including our primary trademarks “GOPRO,” “HERO,” “SESSION,” “KARMA” and the GoPro logos. The GoPro brand is integral to the growth of our business and expansion into new markets. Maintaining, promoting and positioning our brand will largely depend on the success of our marketing and merchandising efforts, our ability to provide consistent, high quality products and services, and our consumers’ satisfaction with the technical support and software updates we provide. Failure to grow and maintain our brand or negative publicity related to our products, our consumers’ user-generated content, the athletes we sponsor, the celebrities we are associated with, or the labor policies of any of our suppliers or manufacturers could adversely affect our brand, business and operating results. Maintaining and enhancing our brand also requires substantial financial investments, although there is no guarantee that these investments will increase sales of our products or positively affect our operating results. Changing laws governing e-commerce and data collection could impede growth and increase the cost of doing business. Changing regulations and laws governing the Internet, data privacy, data protection and e-commerce transactions (including taxation, pricing and electronic communications) could impede the growth of our e-commerce business, increase our cost of doing business and limit our ability to collect and use information collected from our users. Further, new regulations limiting our ability to collect, use and disclose consumer data, or imposing additional requirements with respect to the retention and security of consumer data, could limit our marketing activities and could adversely affect our business and financial condition. If we do not effectively maintain and further develop our sales channels, including developing and supporting our retail sales channel and distributors, our business could be harmed. We depend upon effective sales channels to reach the consumers who are the ultimate purchasers of our products. In the United States, we primarily sell our products directly through a mix of retail channels, including big box, mid-market and specialty retailers, and we reach certain U.S. markets through distributors. In international markets, we primarily sell through distributors who in turn sell to local retailers; however, we also have direct sales relationships with certain customers. We depend on retailers to provide adequate and attractive space for our products and POP displays in their stores. We further depend on our retailers to employ, educate and motivate their sales personnel to effectively sell our products. If our retailers do not adequately display our products, choose to reduce the space for our products and POP displays in their stores or locate them in less than premium positioning, or choose not to carry some or all of our products or promote competitors’ products over ours or do not effectively explain to customers the advantages of our products, our sales could decrease and our business could be harmed. Similarly, our business could be adversely affected if any of our large retail customers were to experience financial difficulties, or change 21 the focus of their businesses in a way that deemphasized the sale of our products. We also continue to invest in providing new retailers with POP displays and expanding the footprint of our POP displays in existing stores, and there can be no assurance that this investment will lead to increased revenue. Our distributors generally offer products from several different manufacturers. Accordingly, we are at risk that these distributors may give higher priority to selling other companies’ products. We have consolidated our distributor channels in certain regions, and if we were to lose the services of a distributor, we might need to find another distributor in that area and there can be no assurance of our ability to do so in a timely manner or on favorable terms. Further, our distributors build inventory in anticipation of future sales, and if such sales do not occur as rapidly as they anticipate, our distributors will decrease the size of their future product orders. We are also subject to the risks of our distributors encountering financial difficulties, which could impede their effectiveness and also expose us to financial risk if they are unable to pay for the products they purchase from us. Additionally, our international distributors buy from us in U.S. dollars and generally sell to retailers in local currency so significant currency fluctuations could affect their profitability, and in turn, affect their ability to buy future products from us. For example, the Brexit referendum vote in the U.K., caused significant short term volatility in global stock markets as well as currency exchange rate fluctuations. We have converted portions of our distributors’ business into direct sales, and if we were to do this on a larger scale, it could create significant disruptions to our distribution channel and the associated revenue. Any reduction in sales by our current distributors, loss of key distributors or decrease in revenue from our distributors could adversely affect our revenue, operating results and financial condition. A small number of retailers and distributors account for a substantial portion of our revenue, and if our relationships with any of these retailers or distributors were to be terminated or the level of business with them significantly reduced, our business could be harmed. Our ten largest customers, measured by the revenue we derive from them, accounted for 48%, 50% and 52% of our revenue for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. One retailer accounted for 15%, 17% and 14% of our revenue for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. A second retailer accounted for less than 10% of our revenue in 2017 but accounted for 11% and 12% of our revenue in 2016 and 2015, respectively. The loss of a small number of our large customers, or the reduction in business with one or more of our large customers, could have a significant adverse effect on our operating results. In addition, we may choose to temporarily or permanently stop shipping product to customers who do not follow the policies and guidelines in our sales agreements, which could have a material negative effect on our revenues and operating results. Our sales agreements with these large customers do not require them to purchase any meaningful amount of our products annually and we grant limited rights to return product to some of these large customers. If we encounter problems with our distribution system, our ability to deliver our products to the market and to meet customer expectations could be harmed. We rely on third-party distribution facilities for substantially all of our product distribution to distributors and directly to retailers. Our distribution facilities include computer controlled and automated equipment, which means their operations may be vulnerable to computer viruses or other security risks, the proper operation of software and hardware, electronic or power interruptions or other system failures. Further, because substantially all of our products are distributed from only a few locations and by a small number of companies, our operations could be interrupted by labor difficulties, extreme or severe weather conditions, or floods, fires or other natural disasters near our distribution centers, or port shutdowns or other transportation-related interruptions along our distribution routes. Additionally, we use one primary supplier for the third-party distribution and if this supplier were to experience financial difficulties, it could adversely affect our business. We may be subject to warranty claims that could result in significant direct or indirect costs, or we could experience greater returns from retailers than expected, which could harm our business and operating results. We generally provide a 12-month warranty on all of our products, except in the European Union, or EU, where we provide a two-year warranty on all of our products. The occurrence of any material defects in our products could make us liable for damages and warranty claims in excess of our current reserves. In addition, we could incur significant costs to correct any defects, warranty claims or other problems, including costs related to product 22 recalls. Any negative publicity related to the perceived quality and safety of our products could affect our brand image, decrease retailer, distributor and consumer confidence and demand, and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Also, while our warranty is limited to repairs and returns, warranty claims may result in litigation, the occurrence of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. Based on our historical experience with our camera products, we have an established methodology for estimating warranty liabilities with respect to cameras and accessories. However, we have insufficient data and historical experience to be able to predict future warranty claims related to our Fusion spherical camera. In 2016, we launched GoPro Care, a fee-based service that offers a range of support options to our consumers, including extended warranty and accidental damage coverage in the United States, and we plan to expand GoPro Care internationally. Accidental damage coverage and extended warranties are regulated in the United States on a state level and are treated differently by state. Additionally, outside the United States, regulations for extended warranties and accidental damage vary from country to country. Changes in interpretation of the insurance regulations or other laws and regulations concerning extended warranties and accidental damage coverage on a federal, state, local or international level may cause us to incur costs or have additional regulatory requirements to meet in the future in order to continue to offer GoPro Care in compliance with any similar laws adopted in other jurisdictions. Our failure to comply with past, present and future similar laws could result in reduced sales of our products, reputational damage, penalties and other sanctions, which could harm our business and financial condition. Consumers may be injured while engaging in activities with our products, and we may be exposed to claims, or regulations could be imposed, which could adversely affect our brand, operating results and financial condition. Consumers use our cameras, drones and their associated mounts and accessories to self-capture their participation in a wide variety of physical activities, including extreme sports, which in many cases carry the risk of significant injury or death. Consumers may also use our drones for a wide range of flight activity, including aerial data collection, videography and photography. We may be subject to claims that users have been injured or harmed by or while using our products, including false claims or erroneous reports relating to safety, security or privacy issues, or that personal property has been damaged as a result of use of our drone. Although we maintain insurance to help protect us from the risk of such claims, such insurance may not be sufficient or may not apply to all situations. Similarly, proprietors of establishments at which consumers engage in challenging physical activities could seek to ban the use of our products in their facilities to limit their own liability. In addition, if lawmakers or governmental agencies were to determine that the use of our products increased the risk of injury or harm to all or a subset of our users or should otherwise be restricted to protect consumers, they may pass laws or adopt regulations that limit the use of our products or increase our liability associated with the use of our products. Any of these events could adversely affect our brand, operating results and financial condition. Our intellectual property and proprietary rights may not adequately protect our products and services, and our business may suffer if it is alleged or determined that our technology, products, or another aspect of our business infringes third-party intellectual property or if third parties infringe our rights. We own patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and other intellectual property (collectively “intellectual property”) related to aspects of our products, software, services and designs. Our commercial success may depend in part on our ability to obtain, maintain and protect these rights in the United States and abroad. We regularly file patent applications to protect innovations arising from our research, development and design as we deem appropriate. We may fail to apply for patents on important products, services, technologies or designs in a timely fashion, or at all. We may not have sufficient intellectual property rights in all countries where unauthorized third-party copying or use of our proprietary technology occurs and the scope of our intellectual property might be more limited in certain countries. Our existing and future patents may not be sufficient to protect our products, services, technologies or designs and/or may not prevent others from developing competing products, services, technologies or designs. We cannot predict the validity and enforceability of our patents and other intellectual property with certainty. We have registered, and applied to register, certain of our trademarks in several jurisdictions worldwide. In some of those jurisdictions, third-party filings exist for the same, similar or otherwise related products or services, which 23 could block the registration of our marks. Even if we are able to register our marks, competitors may adopt or file similar marks to ours, seek to cancel our trademark registrations, register domain names that mimic or incorporate our marks, or otherwise infringe upon or harm our trademark rights. Although we police our trademark rights carefully, there can be no assurance that we are aware of all third-party uses or that we will prevail in enforcing our rights in all such instances. Any of these negative outcomes could affect the strength, value and effectiveness of our brand, as well as our ability to market our products. We have also registered domain names for websites, or URLs, that we use in our business, such as gopro.com. If we are unable to protect our domain names, our brand, business, and operating results could be adversely affected. Domain names similar to ours have already been registered in the United States and elsewhere, and we may not be able to prevent third parties from acquiring and using domain names that infringe, are similar to, or otherwise decrease the value of, our trademarks. In addition, we might not be able to, or may choose not to, acquire or maintain trademark registrations, domain names, or other related rights in certain jurisdiction. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights. Initiating infringement proceedings against third parties can be expensive, take significant time, and divert management’s attention from other business concerns. We may not prevail in litigation to enforce our intellectual property against unauthorized use. Third parties, including competitors and non-practicing entities, have brought intellectual property infringement claims against us. We expect to continue to receive such intellectual property claims in the future. While we will defend ourselves vigorously against any such existing and future legal proceedings, we may not prevail against all such allegations. We may seek licenses from third parties where appropriate, but they could refuse to grant us a license or demand commercially unreasonable terms. Further, an adverse ruling in an intellectual property infringement proceeding could force us to suspend or permanently cease the production or sale of products/ services, face a temporary or permanent injunction, redesign our products/services, rebrand our products/ services, pay significant settlement costs, pay third-party license fees or damage awards or give up some of our intellectual property. The occurrence of any of these events may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. If we are unable to maintain or acquire rights to include intellectual property owned by others in the content distributed by us, our marketing, sales or future business strategy could be affected or we could be subject to lawsuits relating to our use of this content. The distribution of GoPro content helps to market our brand and our products. If we cannot continue to acquire rights to distribute user-generated content or acquire rights to use and distribute music, athlete and celebrity names and likenesses or other content for our original productions or third-party entertainment distribution channels or for our software products, our marketing efforts could be diminished, our sales could be harmed and our future content strategy could be adversely affected. In addition, third-party content providers or owners may allege that we have violated their intellectual property rights. If we are unable to obtain sufficient rights, successfully defend our use of or otherwise alter our business practices on a timely basis in response to claims of infringement, misappropriation, misuse or other violation of third-party intellectual property rights, our business may be adversely affected. As a user and distributor of content, we face potential liability for rights of publicity and privacy, as well as copyright, or trademark infringement or other claims based on the nature and content of materials that we distribute. If we are found to violate such third-party rights, then our business may suffer. If we encounter issues with our manufacturers or suppliers, our business, brand, and results of operations could be harmed and we could lose sales. We do not have internal manufacturing capabilities and rely on several contract manufacturers, located primarily in China, to manufacture our products. We cannot be certain that we will not experience operational difficulties with our manufacturers, including reductions in the availability of production capacity, errors in complying with product specifications, insufficient quality control, failures to meet production deadlines, increases in manufacturing costs and increased lead times. We also rely on a number of supply chain partners to whom we outsource activities related to inventory warehousing, order fulfillment, distribution and other direct sales logistics. Our supply chain partners are located in China, Czech Republic, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Singapore and a number of other countries in Europe and the Asia Pacific region. Our manufacturers and supply chain partners may experience disruptions in their operations due to equipment breakdowns, labor strikes or shortages, natural disasters, component or material shortages, cost increases or other similar problems. Further, in order to 24 minimize their inventory risk, our manufacturers might not order components from third-party suppliers with adequate lead time, thereby affecting our ability to meet our demand forecast. Therefore, if we fail to manage our relationship with our manufacturers and supply chain partners effectively, or if they experience operational difficulties, our ability to ship products to our retailers and distributors could be impaired and our competitive position and reputation could be harmed. In the event that we receive shipments of products that fail to comply with our technical specifications or that fail to conform to our quality control standards, and we are not able to obtain replacement products in a timely manner, we risk revenue losses from the inability to sell those products, increased administrative and shipping costs, and lower profitability. Additionally, if defects are not discovered until after consumers purchase our products, they could lose confidence in the technical attributes of our products and our business could be harmed. For example, in the first quarter of 2018, we end of lifed our REMO accessory related to battery performance. We do not control our contract manufacturers or suppliers, including their labor, environmental or other practices. Environmental regulations or changes in the supply, demand or available sources of natural resources may affect the availability and cost of goods and services necessary to run our business. We require our contract manufacturers and suppliers to comply with our formal supplier code of conduct and relevant standards and have ongoing audit programs in place to assess our suppliers’ compliance with our requirements. We periodically conduct audits of our contract manufacturers’ and suppliers’ compliance with our code of conduct, applicable laws and good industry practices. However, these audits may not be frequent or thorough enough to detect non- compliance. Deliberate violations of labor, environmental or other laws by our contract manufacturers or suppliers, or a failure of these parties to follow ethical business practices, could lead to negative publicity and harm our reputation or brand. Failure to obtain new, and maintain existing, high-quality event, venue, athlete and celebrity sponsorships could harm our business. Establishing relationships with high profile sporting and entertainment events, venues, sports leagues and sports associations, athletes and celebrity personalities to evaluate, promote and establish product credibility with consumers, including entering into sponsorship and licensing agreements, has and will continue to be a key element of our marketing strategy. However, as competition in our markets has increased, the costs of obtaining and retaining event, venue, athlete and celebrity sponsorships and licensing agreements have increased. Additionally, we may be forced to sign longer term sponsorships in order to retain relationships. If we are unable to maintain our current associations with our event, venue, athlete and celebrity partners, or to do so at a reasonable cost, we could lose the benefits of these relationships, and we may be required to modify and substantially increase our marketing investments. In addition, actions taken by endorsers of our products that harm their reputations could also harm our brand image with consumers. The failure to correctly identify high impact events and venues or build partnerships with those who develop and promote those events and venues, promising athletes or other appealing personalities to use and endorse our products, or poor performance by our endorsers, could adversely affect our brand and result in decreased sales of our products. We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act or similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions in which we operate. The global nature of our business and the significance of our international revenue create various domestic and local regulatory challenges and subject us to risks associated with our international operations. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or the U.K. Bribery Act, and similar anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit U.S.-based companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, directing business to another, or securing an advantage. In addition, U.S. public companies are required to maintain records that accurately and fairly represent their transactions and have an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Under the FCPA, U.S. companies may be held liable for the corrupt actions taken by directors, officers, employees, agents, or other strategic or local partners or representatives. As such, if we or our intermediaries fail to comply with the requirements of the FCPA or similar legislation, governmental authorities in the United States and elsewhere could seek to impose substantial civil and/or criminal fines and penalties which could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, operating results and financial condition. 25 We operate in areas of the world that experience corruption by government officials to some degree and, in certain circumstances, compliance with anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Our global operations require us to import and export to and from several countries, which geographically expands our compliance obligations. In addition, changes in such laws could result in increased regulatory requirements and compliance costs which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot be assured that our employees or other agents will not engage in prohibited conduct and render us responsible under the FCPA or the U.K. Bribery Act. While we have compliance programs, they may not be effective to prevent violations from occurring and employees may engage in prohibited conduct nonetheless. If we are found to be in violation of the FCPA, the U.K. Bribery Act or other anti-bribery or anti- corruption laws (either due to acts or inadvertence of our employees, or due to the acts or inadvertence of others), we could suffer criminal or civil penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We are subject to governmental export and import controls and economic sanctions laws that could subject us to liability and impair our ability to compete in international markets. The U.S. and various foreign governments have imposed controls, export license requirements and restrictions on the import or export of some technologies. Our products are subject to U.S. export controls, and exports of our products must be made in compliance with various economic and trade sanctions laws. Furthermore, U.S. export control laws and economic sanctions prohibit the provision of products and services to countries, governments, and persons targeted by U.S. sanctions. Even though we take precautions to prevent our products from being provided to targets of U.S. sanctions, our products, including our firmware updates, could be provided to those targets or provided by our customers. Any such provision could have negative consequences, including government investigations, penalties and reputational harm. Our failure to obtain required import or export approval for our products could harm our international and domestic sales and adversely affect our revenue. We could be subject to future enforcement action with respect to compliance with governmental export and import controls and economic sanctions laws that result in penalties, costs, and restrictions on export privileges that could have a material effect on our business and operating results. Our effective tax rate and the intended tax benefits of our corporate structure and intercompany arrangements depend on the application of the tax laws of various jurisdictions and on how we operate our business. We are subject to income taxes in the United States and various jurisdictions outside the United States. Our effective tax rate could fluctuate due to changes in the mix of earnings and losses in countries with differing statutory tax rates. For example, our effective tax rates could be adversely affected by earnings being lower than anticipated in countries where we have lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries where we have higher statutory rates. Our tax expense could also be affected by changes in non-deductible expenses, changes in excess tax benefits related to exercises and vesting of stock-based expense, and the applicability of withholding taxes. Additionally, in December 2017, the current U.S. administration signed an act referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), generally effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The TCJA is complex and includes significant amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, including amendments that significantly change the taxation of offshore earnings and the deductibility of interest. The TCJA had a material impact on the value of our deferred tax assets and could increase our future U.S. tax expense. Furthermore, changes to the taxation of undistributed foreign earnings could change our future intentions regarding reinvestment of such earnings. We are currently assessing the effect of the TCJA on our business and consolidated financial statements. See Note 9 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the TCJA. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates in various jurisdictions may be subject to significant change. Our future effective tax rates could be unfavorably affected by changes in the tax rates in jurisdictions where our income is earned, by changes in, or our interpretation, of tax rules and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we do business, by unanticipated decreases in the amount of earnings in countries with low statutory tax rates, or by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. The United States, the European Commission, 26 countries in the European Union, Australia and other countries where we do business have been considering changes in relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations and interpretations, including changes to tax laws applicable to corporate multinationals. These potential changes could adversely affect our effective tax rates or result in other costs to us. In addition, we are subject to the examination of our income tax returns by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and other domestic and foreign tax authorities. These tax examinations are expected to focus on our intercompany transfer pricing practices as well as other matters. We regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and other taxes and have reserved for adjustments that may result from the current examinations. We cannot provide assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position. If we are unable to maintain effective internal control in the future, we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements, which could adversely affect our investors’ confidence and our stock price. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to evaluate and determine the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and to include a management report assessing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to place significant demands on our financial and operational resources, as well as IT systems. While we have determined that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017, we must continue to monitor and assess our internal control over financial reporting. Our control environment may not be sufficient to remediate or prevent future material weaknesses or significant deficiencies from occurring. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and all instances of fraud will be detected. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the market price of our Class A common stock could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. We use open source software in our platform that may subject our technology to general release or require us to re-engineer our solutions, which may cause harm to our business. We use open source software in connection with our services. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products have faced claims challenging the ownership of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. Therefore, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or noncompliance with open source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute or make available open source software as part of their software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software or make available any derivative works of the open source code on unfavorable terms or at no cost. While we monitor our use of open source software and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would require us to disclose the source code or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, such use could nevertheless occur and we may be required to release our proprietary source code, pay damages for breach of contract, re-engineer our applications, discontinue sales in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. 27 Our reported financial results may be negatively impacted by the changes in the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results, and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement or effectiveness of a change. For example, in May 2014 the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is expected to immaterially change the amount and timing of revenue recognized related to certain sales incentives. Other companies in our industry may apply these accounting principles differently than we do, which may affect the comparability of our financial statements. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies and estimates prove to be incorrect, our operating results could be adversely affected. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 in the section titled Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our operating results may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our operating results to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in our stock price. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, inventory valuation, stock-based compensation expense, warranty reserves, goodwill and acquired intangible assets, and accounting for income taxes including deferred tax assets and liabilities. Catastrophic events or political instability could disrupt and cause harm to our business. Our headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, an area susceptible to earthquakes. A major earthquake or other natural disaster, fire, act of terrorism or other catastrophic event in California or elsewhere that results in the destruction or disruption of any of our critical business operations or information technology systems could severely affect our ability to conduct normal business operations and, as a result, our future operating results could be harmed. Our key manufacturing, supply and distribution partners have global operations including in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore and Taiwan as well as the United States. Political instability or catastrophic events in any of those countries could adversely affect our business in the future, our financial condition and operating results. If we fail to comply with environmental regulations and conflict minerals disclosures, our business, financial condition, operating results and reputation could be adversely affected. We are subject to various federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations including laws regulating the manufacture, import, use, discharge and disposal of hazardous materials, labeling and notice requirements relating to potential consumer exposure to certain chemicals, and laws relating to the collection of and recycling of electrical and electronic equipment and their packaging. We are also subject to the SEC’s conflict minerals rule which requires disclosure by public companies of the origin, source and chain of custody of specified minerals, known as conflict minerals, that are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. We have and will continue to incur costs associated with complying with the rule, such as costs related to sourcing of certain minerals (or derivatives thereof), the determination of the origin, source and chain of custody of the minerals used in our products, the adoption of conflict minerals-related governance policies, processes and controls, and possible changes to products or sources of supply as a result of such activities. Within our supply chain, we may not be 28 able to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in our products through the data collection and due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. Although we have policies and procedures in place requiring our contract manufacturers and major component suppliers to comply with applicable federal, state, local and international requirements, we cannot confirm that our manufacturers and suppliers consistently comply with these requirements. In addition, if there are changes to these or other laws (or their interpretation) or if new similar laws are passed in other jurisdictions, we may be required to re-engineer our products to use components compatible with these regulations. This re-engineering and component substitution could result in additional costs to us or disrupt our operations or logistics. Changes in interpretation of any federal, state, local or international regulation may cause us to incur costs or have additional regulatory requirements to meet in the future in order to comply, or with any similar laws adopted in other jurisdictions. Our failure to comply with past, present and future similar laws could result in reduced sales of our products, substantial product inventory write-offs, reputational damage, penalties and other sanctions, which could harm our business and financial condition. We also expect that our products will be affected by new environmental laws and regulations on an ongoing basis. To date, our expenditures for environmental compliance have not had a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows and, although we cannot predict the future effect of such laws or regulations, they will likely result in additional costs and may increase penalties associated with violations or require us to change the content of our products or how they are manufactured, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Risks related to Ownership of our Class A Common Stock Our stock price has been and will likely continue to be volatile. Since shares of our Class A common stock were sold in our IPO in July 2014 at a price of $24.00 per share, our closing stock price has ranged from $7.24 to $93.85 per share through December 31, 2017. Our stock price may fluctuate in response to a number of events and factors, such as quarterly operating results; changes in our financial projections provided to the public or our failure to meet those projections; the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC; significant transactions, or new features, products or services offered by us or our competitors; changes in our business lines and product lineup; changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts; media coverage of our business and financial performance; the operating and stock price performance of, or other developments involving, other companies that investors may deem comparable to us; trends in our industry; any significant change in our management; sales and purchases of any Class A common stock issued upon conversion of our convertible senior notes or in connection with the prepaid forward contract entered into in connection with such convertible senior notes, and general economic conditions. These factors, as well as the volatility of our Class A common stock, could also affect the price of our convertible senior notes. In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices for companies in our industry, have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to operating performance. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock, regardless of our operating performance. Price volatility over a given period may cause the average price at which we repurchase our own stock to exceed the stock’s price at a given point in time. Volatility in our stock price also affects the value of our equity compensation, which affects our ability to recruit and retain employees. In addition, some companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We are a defendant in three shareholder class action lawsuits as well as a shareholder derivative lawsuit and may continue to be a target for such litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and liability and divert our management’s attention from other business concerns, which could harm our business. See Legal Proceedings. If we fail to meet expectations related to future growth, profitability, or other market expectations, our stock price may decline significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on investor confidence and employee retention. A sustained decline in our stock price and market capitalization could lead to impairment charges. 29 The dual class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with our CEO and we cannot predict the effect our dual class structure may have on our stock price or our business. Our Class B common stock has 10 votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. Stockholders who hold shares of Class B common stock hold approximately 76.5% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock as of December 31, 2017 with Mr. Woodman, our Chairman and CEO, holding approximately 76.2% of the outstanding voting power. Mr. Woodman is able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other major corporate transaction. This concentrated control could delay, defer, or prevent a change of control, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that our other stockholders support, or conversely this concentrated control could result in the consummation of such a transaction that our other stockholders do not support. This concentrated control could also discourage a potential investor from acquiring our Class A common stock due to the limited voting power of such stock relative to the Class B common stock and might harm the trading price of our Class A common stock. In addition, we cannot predict whether our dual class structure, combined with the concentrated control with Mr. Woodman, will result in a lower or more volatile market price of our Class A common stock or in adverse publicity or other adverse consequences. For example, certain index providers have announced restrictions on including companies with multiple-class share structures in certain of their indexes. In July 2017, FTSE Russell announced that it plans to require new constituents of its indexes to have greater than 5% of the company’s voting rights in the hands of public stockholders, and S&P Dow Jones announced that it will no longer admit companies with multiple-class share structures to certain of its indexes. Because of our dual class structure, we may be excluded from these indexes and we cannot assure you that other stock indexes will not take similar actions. Given the sustained flow of investment funds into passive strategies that seek to track certain indexes, exclusion from stock indexes would likely preclude investment by many of these funds and could make our Class A common stock less attractive to other investors. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected. If securities analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline. The trading market for our Class A common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline. Delaware law and provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our Class A common stock. Our status as a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change in control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our board of directors, or otherwise adversely affect the rights of the holders of our Class A and Class B common stock, including the following: • our board of directors is not currently classified, but at such time as all shares of our Class B common stock have been converted into shares of our Class A common stock, our board of directors will be classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms; so long as any shares of our Class B common stock are outstanding, special meetings of our stockholders may be called by the holders of 10% of the outstanding voting power of all then outstanding shares of stock, a majority of our board of directors, the chairman of our board of directors, our chief executive officer or our president, • 30 • • • • • when no shares of our Class B common stock are outstanding, only the chairman of our board of directors, our chief executive officer, our president or a majority of our board of directors will be authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders; our stockholders may only take action at a meeting of stockholders and not by written consent; vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by our board of directors and not by stockholders; directors may be removed from office with or without cause so long as our board of directors is not classified, and thereafter directors may be removed from office only for cause; our restated certificate of incorporation provides for a dual class common stock structure in which holders of our Class B common stock have the ability to control the outcome of matters requiring stockholder approval, even if they own significantly less than a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets; our restated certificate of incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established, and shares of which may be issued, by our board of directors without stockholder approval and which may contain voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to those of our Class A and Class B common stock; and advance notice procedures apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders. • • Risks related to our convertible senior notes We have indebtedness in the form of convertible senior notes. In April 2017, we completed an offering of $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% convertible senior Notes due 2022 (Notes). As a result of this Notes offering, we incurred $175.0 million principal amount of indebtedness, the principal amount of which we may be required to pay at maturity in 2022. Holders of the Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase their Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, the indenture for the Notes provides that we are required to repay amounts due under the indenture in the event that there is an event of default for the Notes that results in the principal, premium, if any, and interest, if any, becoming due prior to Maturity Date for the Notes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to repay this indebtedness when due, or that we will be able to refinance this indebtedness on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, this indebtedness could, among other things: • • • • heighten our vulnerability to adverse general economic conditions and heightened competitive pressures; require us to dedicate a larger portion of our cash flow from operations to interest payments, limiting the availability of cash for other purposes; limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; and impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other purposes. In addition, our ability to purchase the Notes or repay prior to maturity any accelerated amounts under the Notes upon an event of default or pay cash upon conversions of the Notes may be limited by law, by regulatory authority or by agreements governing our indebtedness outstanding at the time, including our credit facility. Our credit facility restricts our ability to repurchase the Notes for cash or repay prior to maturity any accelerated amounts under the Notes upon an event of default or pay cash upon conversion of the Notes to the extent that on the date of such repurchase, repayment or conversion, as the case may be, after giving pro forma effect to such payment, our remaining borrowing capacity pursuant to such credit facility falls below (i) to the extent that our fixed charge coverage ratio is at least to 1.0, the greater of (A) $37.5 million and (B) 15% of the lesser of the aggregate commitments under such credit facility and the aggregate borrowing base then in effect or (ii) to the extent that our fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.0 to 1.0, the greater of (A) $50.0 million and (B) 20% of the lesser of the aggregate commitments under such credit facility and the aggregate borrowing base then in effect. Any of our future indebtedness may contain similar restrictions. Our failure to repurchase Notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the indenture (whether upon a fundamental change or otherwise under the indenture) or pay cash payable on future conversions of the Notes as required by the indenture would constitute a default under the indenture. A default under the indenture or the fundamental change itself could also lead to a default 31 under agreements governing our existing or future indebtedness, including our credit facility. If the repayment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness, repurchase the Notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof. Our credit facility imposes restrictions on us that may adversely affect our ability to operate our business. Our credit facility contains restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, our credit facility contains, and the agreements governing the Notes will contain, a cross-default provision whereby a default under one agreement would likely result in cross defaults under agreements covering other borrowings. For example, the occurrence of a default with respect to any indebtedness or any failure to repay debt when due in an amount in excess of $25 million would cause a cross default under the indenture governing the Notes, as well as under our credit facility. The occurrence of a default under any of these borrowing arrangements would permit the holders of the Notes or the lenders under our credit facility to declare all amounts outstanding under those borrowing arrangements to be immediately due and payable. If the note holders or the trustee under the indenture governing the Notes or the lenders under our credit facility accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient assets to repay those borrowings. Conversion of the Notes will, to the extent we deliver shares upon conversion of such Notes, dilute the ownership interest of existing stockholders, including holders who had previously converted their Notes, or may otherwise depress our stock price. The conversion of some or all of the Notes will dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders to the extent we deliver shares upon conversion of any of the Notes. Any sales in the public market of the common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the Notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the Notes into shares of our common stock could depress our stock price. The conditional conversion feature of the Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. In the event the conditional conversion feature of the Notes is triggered, holders of the Notes will be entitled to convert the Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than cash in lieu of any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders of the Notes do not elect to convert their Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital. The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the Notes, may have a material effect on our reported financial results. Under GAAP, an entity must separately account for the debt component and the embedded conversion option of convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, such as the Notes we are offering, in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The effect of the accounting treatment for such instruments is that the value of such embedded conversion option would be treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Notes, and that original issue discount is amortized into interest expense over the term of the Notes using an effective yield method. As a result, we will initially be required to record a greater amount of non-cash interest expense because of the amortization of the original issue discount to the Notes’ face amount over the term of the Notes and because of the amortization of the debt issuance costs. Accordingly, we will report lower net income (or greater net loss) in our financial results because of the recognition of both the current period’s amortization of the debt discount and the Notes’ coupon interest, which could 32 adversely affect our reported or future financial results, the trading price of our common stock and the trading price of the Notes. In addition, convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partly in cash are currently accounted for utilizing the if-converted method, the effect of which is that conversion will not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share if the effect would be antidilutive. Under the if-converted method, for diluted earnings per share purposes, convertible debt is antidilutive whenever its interest, net of tax and nondiscretionary adjustments, per common share obtainable on conversion exceeds basic earnings per share. Dilutive securities that are issued during a period and dilutive convertible securities for which conversion options lapse, or for which related debt is extinguished during a period, will be included in the denominator of diluted earnings per share for the period that they were outstanding. Likewise, dilutive convertible securities converted during a period will be included in the denominator for the period prior to actual conversion. Moreover, interest charges applicable to the convertible debt will be added back to the numerator. We cannot be sure that the accounting standards in the future will continue to permit the use of the if-converted method. If we are unable to use the if-converted method in accounting for the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes, then our diluted earnings per share would be adversely affected. In addition, if the conditional conversion feature of the Notes is triggered, even if holders do not elect to convert their Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital. The prepaid forward may affect the value of the Notes and our common stock and may result in unexpected market activity in the Notes and/or our common stock. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we entered into a prepaid forward with a forward counterparty. The prepaid forward is intended to facilitate privately negotiated derivative transactions by which investors in the Notes will be able to hedge their investment. In connection with establishing its initial hedge of the prepaid forward, the forward counterparty (or its affiliate) entered into or expects to enter into one or more derivative transactions with respect to our Class A common stock with purchasers of the Notes concurrently with or after the offering of the Notes. The prepaid forward is intended to reduce the dilution to our stockholders from the issuance of our Class A common stock (if any) upon conversion of the Notes and to allow certain investors to establish short positions that generally correspond to commercially reasonable initial hedges of their investment in the Notes. In addition, the forward counterparty (or its affiliate) may modify its hedge position by entering into or unwinding one or more derivative transactions with respect to our Class A common stock and/or purchasing or selling our Class A common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions at any time, including following the offering of the Notes and immediately prior to or shortly after April 15, 2022, the Maturity Date of the Notes (and are likely to unwind their derivative transactions and/or purchase or sell our Class A common stock in connection with any conversion or repurchase of the Notes, in connection with the purchase or sale of Notes by certain investors and/or in the event that sufficient borrow of our Class A common stock becomes available). These activities could also cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our Class A common stock or the Notes. The prepaid forward initially facilitated privately negotiated derivative transactions relating to our Class A common stock, including derivative transactions by which investors in the Notes established short positions relating to our Class A common stock to hedge their investments in the Notes concurrently with, or shortly after, the placement of the Notes. Neither we nor the forward counterparty control how such investors may use such derivative transactions. In addition, such investors may enter into other transactions in connection with such derivative transactions, including the purchase or sale of our Class A common stock, at any time. As a result, the existence of the prepaid forward, such derivative transactions, and any related market activity could cause more sales of our Class A common stock over the term of the prepaid forward than there would have otherwise been had we not entered into the prepaid forward. Such sales could potentially affect the market price of our Class A common stock and/or the Notes. 33 The fundamental change repurchase feature of the Notes may delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial attempt to take over our company. The terms of the Notes require us to repurchase the Notes in the event of a fundamental change. A takeover of our company would trigger an option of the holders of the Notes to require us to repurchase the Notes. In addition, if a make-whole fundamental change occurs prior to the Maturity Date of the Notes, we will in some cases be required to increase the conversion rate for a holder that elects to convert its Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change. Furthermore, the indenture for the Notes prohibits us from engaging in certain mergers or acquisitions unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes our obligations under the Notes. These and other provisions of the indenture may have the effect of delaying or preventing a takeover of our company. We are subject to counterparty risk with respect to the prepaid forward. We will be subject to the risk that the forward counterparty might default under the prepaid forward. Our exposure to the credit risk of the forward counterparty will not be secured by any collateral. Global economic conditions have in the recent past resulted in, and may again result in, the actual or perceived failure or financial difficulties of many financial institutions. If the forward counterparty becomes subject to insolvency proceedings, we will become an unsecured creditor in those proceedings, with a claim equal to our exposure at that time under our transactions with the forward counterparty. Our exposure will depend on many factors, but, generally, an increase in our exposure will be correlated to an increase in the market price of our common stock. In addition, upon a default by the forward counterparty, we may suffer more dilution than we currently anticipate with respect to our Class A common stock. We can provide no assurances as to the financial stability or viability of the forward counterparty to the prepaid forward. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties As of December 31, 2017, we leased office facilities around the world totaling approximately 577,000 square feet, including approximately 311,000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in San Mateo, California. All of our properties are currently leased. We believe our existing facilities are adequate to meet our current requirements. If we were to require additional space, we believe we will be able to obtain such space on acceptable, commercially reasonable terms. See Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about our lease commitments. Item 3. Legal Proceedings Shareholder class action lawsuits Beginning on January 13, 2016, the first of four purported shareholder class action lawsuits was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its officers (the “GoPro Defendants”). Similar complaints were filed on January 21, 2016, February 4, 2016, and February 19, 2016. Each of the complaints purports to bring suit on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s publicly traded securities between July 21, 2015 and January 13, 2016 for the first three complaints and between November 26, 2014 and January 13, 2016 for the last filed complaint. Each complaint purports to allege that defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations and prospects in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and each seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees and costs. On April 21, 2016, the court consolidated the complaints and appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel for the first three actions (the “Camia Investments Class Action”); the court allowed the fourth action to proceed separately as to the period November 26, 2014 through July 20, 2015 (the “Majesty Palms Class Action”) and appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel for that action. The lead plaintiff in the Majesty Palms Class Action did not file an amended complaint and voluntarily dismissed the Majesty Palms Class Action on July 28, 2016. On 34 September 26, 2016, the GoPro Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Camia Investment Class Action. On May 1, 2017, the court granted that motion, dismissing the complaint with leave to amend the complaint. On June 16, 2017, the lead plaintiff in the Camia Investment Class Action did not file an amended complaint and stipulated to enter final judgment in favor of the GoPro Defendants. On June 18, 2017, the court entered final judgment in favor of the GoPro Defendants. On January 25, 2016, a purported shareholder class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, against the Company, certain of its current and former directors and executive officers and underwriters of the Company’s IPO (“Defendants”). The complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s stock pursuant or traceable to the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the Company’s IPO and alleges claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933. The suit seeks unspecified damages and other relief. A similar complaint was filed on May 13, 2016, and consolidated on June 7, 2016. Defendants filed a demurrer (motion to dismiss) to the consolidated action. On July 13, 2016, the court sustained the demurrer dismissing the complaint with leave to amend the complaint. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on October 7, 2016. Defendants filed a demurrer to the amended complaint on October 28, 2016. On December 16, 2016, the court overruled the demurrer with respect to the Section 11 and 15 claims and sustained the demurrer in part and overruled the demurrer in part with respect to the Section 12(a)(2) claim. Defendants answered the amended complaint on January 3, 2017. On November 20, 2017, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the action. The settlement is subject to final documentation and the approval of the Court, among other conditions. On November 16, 2016, a purported shareholder class action lawsuit (the “2016 Shareholder Class Action”) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and Mr. Woodman, our Chairman and CEO, Brian McGee, our CFO, and Anthony Bates, our former President (“Defendants”). The complaint purports to bring suit on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s publicly traded securities between September 19, 2016 and November 4, 2016. The complaint purports to allege that Defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations and prospects in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees and costs. On February 6, 2017, the court appointed lead plaintiff and lead counsel. On March 14, 2017, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint against the Company and certain of its officers (“GoPro Defendants”) on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company’s publicly traded securities between September 19, 2016 and November 8, 2016. On April 13, 2017, the GoPro Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On July 26, 2017, the court denied that motion and directed plaintiff to amend its complaint to add all defendants the plaintiff intended to sue. On August 4, 2017, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which Defendants answered on September 8, 2017. On November 8, 2017, a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against certain of GoPro’s current and former directors and executive officers and naming the Company as a nominal defendant. The action is based on allegations similar to those in the 2016 Shareholder Class Action and asserts causes of action against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty for allegedly disseminating false and misleading information, breach of fiduciary duty for allegedly misappropriating information and for insider stock sales, unjust enrichment, violation of Section 25402 of the California Corporations Code, and for contribution and indemnification. On January 4, 2018, the court signed an order relating this case to the 2016 Shareholder Class Action. On January 22, 2018, defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and improper forum. By agreement of the parties and court order, defendants need not answer or otherwise respond to the complaint pending the outcome of that motion. Beginning on January 9, 2018, the first of four purported shareholder class action lawsuits (the “2018 Shareholder Class Actions”) were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company, Mr. Woodman, and Mr. McGee (“Defendants”). Similar complaints were filed on January 11, 2018 and January 24, 2018. Each of the complaints purports to bring suit on behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company's publicly traded securities between November 2, 2017 and January 5, 2018 for the first complaint and between August 4, 2017 and January 5, 2018 for the remaining three complaints. Each of the complaints purports to allege that Defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations and prospects in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and seeks unspecified compensatory damages, fees and costs. 35 On February 13, 2018, a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against certain of GoPro’s current and former directors and executive officers and naming the Company as a nominal defendant. The action is based on allegations similar to those in both the 2016 Shareholder Class Action and the 2018 Shareholder Class Actions and asserts causes of action against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, and for making false and misleading statements about the Company’s business, operations and prospects in violation of Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Plaintiff seeks corporate reforms, disgorgement of profits from stock sales, and fees and costs. We are currently and in the future may continue to be subject to litigation, claims and assertions incidental to our business, including patent infringement litigation and product liability claims, as well as other litigation of a non- material nature in the ordinary course of business. Due to inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters. We are unable at this time to determine whether the outcome of the litigation would have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. PART II Item 5. Market for the Company’s Common Shares, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale price per share of our Class A common stock, as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market for the periods indicated: First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 2017 2016 High Low High Low $10.97 $9.18 $11.69 $11.12 $7.24 $7.70 $7.95 $7.57 $18.69 $13.98 $17.15 $17.13 $9.78 $8.80 $10.59 $8.69 Holders. As of January 31, 2018, there were 125 holders of record of our Class A common stock and 43 holders of record of our Class B common stock. Dividends. We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not currently intend to pay any cash dividends on our Class A or Class B common stock in the foreseeable future. Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. The information required by this item will be included in an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. 36 Performance graph. The graph below compares the cumulative total return on our Class A common stock with that of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Consumer Durables Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested (with reinvestment of all dividends, as applicable) at the close of market on June 26, 2014 in the Class A common stock of GoPro, Inc., the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Consumer Durables Index, and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2017. Note that historic stock price performance is not intended to be indicative of future stock price performance. Sales of unregistered securities. Not applicable. Issuer purchases of equity securities. No shares of our Class A or Class B common stock were purchased during the fourth quarter of 2017. 37 Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data The information set forth below for the five years ended December 31, 2017 is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Consolidated statements of operations data: Revenue Gross profit Gross margin Operating income (loss) Net income (loss) Net income (loss) per share: Basic Diluted Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $1,179,741 $1,185,481 $1,619,971 $1,394,205 $ 985,737 $ 384,530 $ 461,920 $ 673,214 $ 627,235 $ 361,784 32.6% 39.0% 41.6% 45.0% 36.7% $ (163,460) $ (372,969) $ (182,873) $ (419,003) $ $ (1.32) (1.32) $ $ (3.01) (3.01) $ $ $ $ 54,748 $ 187,035 36,131 $ 128,088 0.27 0.25 $ $ 1.07 0.92 $ $ $ $ 98,703 60,578 0.54 0.47 Other financial information: Adjusted EBITDA (1) Non-GAAP net income (loss) (2) Non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per share (2) $ (31,368) $ (192,807) $ 179,309 $ 293,380 $ 133,726 $ (95,867) $ (201,247) $ 111,564 $ 188,913 $ (0.69) $ (1.44) $ 0.76 $ 1.32 $ $ 68,826 0.50 (1) We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude the impact of: provision for income taxes, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, POP display amortization, stock-based compensation, impairment charges and restructuring costs. (2) We define non-GAAP net income as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, non-cash interest expense, restructuring costs and taxes related to the tax effect of these adjustments. Acquisition-related costs include the amortization of acquired intangible assets and impairment write-downs (if applicable), as well as third-party transaction costs for legal and other professional services. Non- GAAP earnings per share considers the conversion of the redeemable convertible preferred stock into shares of common stock as though the conversion had occurred at the beginning of the period and the initial public offering shares issued July 2014 as if they had been outstanding since the beginning of the period. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below for additional information and a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and net income (loss) to non-GAAP net income (loss), and a reconciliation of the shares used in the calculation of non-GAAP diluted earnings per share. (in thousands) Consolidated balance sheet data: 2017 2016 As of December 31, 2015 2014 2013 Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities $ 247,390 $ 217,953 $ 474,058 $ 422,256 $ 101,410 Inventory Working capital Total assets Total indebtedness Redeemable convertible preferred stock Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) 150,551 203,156 850,246 130,048 — 167,192 157,074 188,232 538,066 922,640 1,102,976 — — — — 153,026 564,274 917,691 — — 298,705 446,945 772,033 641,204 111,994 57,446 439,671 113,612 77,198 (5,366) 38 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors, including but not limited to, those discussed in Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This MD&A is organized as follows: • Overview. Discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the Company in order to provide context for the remainder of MD&A. • Components of Our Results of Operations. Description of the items contained in each operating revenue and expense caption in the consolidated statements of operations. • Results of Operations. Analysis of our financial results comparing 2017 to 2016 and 2016 to 2015. • Liquidity and Capital Resources. Analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows, and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity. • Contractual Commitments. Overview of contractual obligations, including expected payment schedule and indemnifications as of December 31, 2017. • Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. Accounting estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts. • Non-GAAP Financial Measures. A presentation of results reconciling GAAP to non-GAAP adjusted measures. Overview GoPro, Inc. is enabling the way people capture and share their lives from a perspective only achieved with a GoPro. What began as an idea to help athletes document themselves engaged in sport, GoPro has become a mobile storytelling solution that helps the world share itself through immersive content. Helping people capture, share experiences and manage content is at the core of our business. We are committed to developing solutions that create an easy, seamless experience for consumers to capture, create, enjoy and store engaging personal content. When consumers use our products and services, those products and services enable compelling, authentic content that organically increases awareness for GoPro, driving a virtuous cycle and a self-reinforcing demand for our products. We believe revenue growth may be driven by the introduction of new cameras, accessories and software applications. We believe new camera features and services drive a replacement cycle and attract new users. Our investments in mobile editing and sharing solutions, auto-upload capabilities, local language user-interfaces and voice recognition in multiple languages drive the expansion of our total addressable market. In the fall of 2017, we began shipping our newest cloud connected camera, HERO6 Black, which features image stabilization, telemetry, cloud connectivity and voice control. Our HERO6 Black camera is powered by GoPro’s custom designed GP1 processor and is the most powerful and performance featured GoPro camera to date. HERO6 Black is compatible with our ecosystem of mountable and wearable accessories. We offer many professional-grade features with our current good-better-best camera offerings, of our HERO5 Session, HERO5 Black and HERO6 Black. These cameras feature automatic uploading capabilities for photos and videos to GoPro Plus, our premium cloud-based solution that enables subscribers to easily access, edit and share their content. HERO5 and HERO6 cameras are also compatible with GoPro QuikStories, our mobile experience that seamlessly copies a user’s GoPro photos and video clips to his or her smartphone and transforms them into a ready-to-share video. GoPro QuikStories makes it simple to automatically create shareable video edits complete with music, effects and transitions. 39 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Our product offerings also include our recently announced waterproof 360-degree spherical camera, Fusion and our drone and stabilization solution, Karma. The following is a summary of measures presented in our consolidated financial statements and key metrics used to evaluate our business, measure our performance, develop financial forecasts and make strategic decisions. (units and dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Revenue Camera units shipped (1) Gross margin (2) Operating expenses Net loss Diluted net loss per share Cash provided by (used in) operations Other financial information: Adjusted EBITDA (3) Non-GAAP net income (loss) (4) Non-GAAP income (loss) per share Q4 2017 Q4 2016 FY 2017 FY 2016 $ 334,796 $ 540,621 $ 1,179,741 $ 1,185,481 1,361 23.8% 138,097 (55,848) (0.41) 56,990 (26,544) (41,319) (0.30) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,284 39.2% 238,703 (115,709) (0.82) 12,696 44,343 42,367 0.29 4,303 32.6% 547,990 (182,873) (1.32) (36,853) (31,368) (95,867) (0.69) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,762 39.0% 834,889 (419,003) (3.01) (107,753) (192,807) (201,247) (1.44) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) Represents the number of camera units that are shipped during a reporting period, including camera units that are shipped with drones, net of any returns. Camera units shipped does not include drones sold without a camera, mounts or accessories. (2) One basis point (bps) is equal to 1/100th of 1%. (3) We define adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude the impact of: provision for income taxes, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization, POP display amortization, stock-based compensation, impairment charges and restructuring costs. (4) We define non-GAAP net income (loss) as net income (loss) adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs, non-cash interest expense and income tax adjustments. Acquisition-related costs include amortization and impairment write-downs (if applicable) of acquired intangible assets as well as third-party transaction costs for legal and other professional services. Reconciliations of non-GAAP adjusted measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are presented under Non-GAAP Financial Measures below. Full year and fourth quarter 2017 financial performance Our fourth quarter 2017 revenue was $334.8 million, a decrease of 38.1% year-over-year, primarily attributable to the timing of our HERO5 Black and HERO6 Black camera launches. We shipped our HERO5 Black and HERO5 Session cameras late in the third quarter of 2016, which resulted in the majority of HERO5 Black and HERO5 Session cameras being sold in the fourth quarter of 2016. In 2017, we shipped HERO6 Black earlier in the third quarter, relative to 2016, which provided for more balanced sales of HERO6 Black between the third and fourth quarters of 2017. Revenue for the fourth quarter of 2017 was negatively impacted by $80.5 million in price protection charges related to HERO5 Session, HERO5 Black and HERO6 Black cameras, as well as our Karma drone. Full year 2017 revenue of $1.18 billion was relatively flat year-over-year primarily attributable to a 10.1% increase in our average selling price (defined as total revenue divided by units shipped), offset by a 9.6% decrease in the number of units shipped to 4.3 million units compared to the prior year. See Revenue below. Gross margin of 23.8% for the fourth quarter of 2017 and 32.6% for the full year 2017 reflected the negative impact of $80.5 million for price protection and $14.9 million for Karma write downs and related charges. Gross margin in 2016 of approximately 39.0% for both the fourth quarter of 2016 and full year 2016 were lower than historical levels due to an increase in our average cost per unit shipped, reflecting the enhanced functionality and better capability of our HERO5 cameras when compared to prior generation offerings. See Gross Margin below. Our year-over-year operating expense decreased 42.1% and 34.4% in the fourth quarter and full year 2017, respectively. In 2016, we made significant investments to develop Karma which resulted in higher professional service costs in 2016 compared to 2017. Additionally, the decrease in expenses between 2016 and 2017, on a 40 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations fourth-quarter and full-year basis, was attributable to: (1) lower cash-based personnel-related expenses of approximately $18.1 million and $61.8 million, respectively, driven by a 20% reduction in average global headcount during 2017, (2) lower advertising and promotional activity costs of $16.7 million and $33.9 million, respectively and (3) lower restructuring charges of $3.3 million and $19.7 million, respectively. In the first and fourth quarters of 2016 and first quarter of 2017, we implemented global reductions-in-force and other restructuring actions to reduce our on-going operating expenses. See Operating Expenses and Restructuring Costs below. Net loss was $55.8 million, or $0.41 loss per share, and $182.9 million, or $1.32 loss per share, for the fourth quarter and full year 2017. For the fourth quarter and full year 2017, non-GAAP net loss was $41.3 million, or $0.30 per share, and $95.9 million, or $0.69 per share. Full year adjusted EBITDA improved by $161.4 million to negative $31.4 million, which benefited from our focus on cost management. Fourth quarter 2017 adjusted EBITDA was negative $26.5 million, or $70.9 million less than the fourth quarter 2016. The fourth quarter of 2017 was negatively impacted by $80.5 million of price protection charges and $14.9 million of Karma related charges, offset by a $33.1 million decrease in restructuring charges. Non-GAAP items exclude, where applicable, the effects of stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs, non-cash interest expense and the tax impact of these items. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below for additional information. We ended the year with total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $247.4 million, up 25.9% from the third quarter of 2017. For the fourth quarter of 2017, the increase was due to cash flows from operations of $57.0 million reflecting favorable changes in asset and liabilities, which offset our net loss during the quarter. For the full year 2017, the increase was principally attributable to $91.0 million in net proceeds from the issuance of our Convertible Notes in April 2017 and $9.8 million in cash received from stock purchases made through our ESPP and employee stock option exercises, partially offset by cash flows used in operations of $36.9 million. See Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources below for additional information. Factors affecting performance We believe that our future success will be dependent on many factors, including those further discussed below. While these areas represent opportunities for us, they also represent challenges and risks that we must successfully address in order to continue the growth of our business and improve our results of operations. Driving profitability through improved efficiency, lower costs and better execution. We incurred material operating losses in 2016 and 2017. Our recent restructuring actions have significantly reduced our operating expenses in 2017 compared to the comparable periods in 2016, while also providing a flatter, more efficient global organization that has allowed for improved communication and alignment amongst our functional teams. If we are unable to generate adequate revenue growth, attain gross margin targets, and continue to manage our expenses, we may incur significant losses in the future and may not be able to achieve profitability. Investing in research and development and enhancing our customer experience. Our performance is significantly dependent on the investments we make in research and development, including our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and experienced research and development personnel. We expect the timing of new product releases to continue to have a significant impact on our revenue and we must continually develop and introduce innovative new cameras, mobile applications and other new products and services. We plan to further build upon our integrated mobile and cloud-based storytelling solutions and subscription offerings in future periods. Our investments, including marketing and advertising expenses, may not successfully drive increased sales of our products and our users may not adopt our new offerings. If we fail to innovate and enhance our brand, our integrated storytelling solution, and the value proposition of our subscriptions, our market position and revenue will be adversely affected. Further, we have incurred substantial research and development expenses and if our efforts are not successful, we may not recover the value of these investments. Growing our total addressable market globally. We continue to believe that international markets represent a significant growth opportunity for GoPro. Revenue from outside the United States comprised 55%, 53% and 52% of our revenue in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. While the total market for digital cameras has declined in recent periods, as smartphone and tablet camera quality has improved, we continue to believe our consumers’ differentiated use of GoPro cameras, our integrated storytelling solution and our powerful brand helps insulate our business from many of the negative trends facing this category. However, we expect that the markets in which we 41 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations conduct our business will remain highly competitive. We plan to increase our presence internationally through the active promotion of our brand, the creation and cultivation of regional strategic and marketing partnerships, the continued introduction of localized products in international markets with region specific marketing, and an investment focus on the biggest opportunities in both Europe and Asia-Pacific. Our growth also depends on expanding our total addressable market with our updated subscription service, Plus, other services and capture perspectives, including spherical, which are all resource intensive initiatives in highly competitive markets. If we are not successful in penetrating additional markets, we might not be able to grow revenue and we may not recognize benefits from our investment in new areas. Marketing the improved GoPro experience to our extended community. We intend to continue investing resources in our marketing, advertising and brand management efforts. Historically, our growth has largely been fueled by the adoption of our products by people looking to self-capture images of themselves participating in exciting physical activities. Our future growth depends on continuing to reach, expand and re-engage with this core demographic and grow it. In addition, we need to expand our user base to include a broader group of consumers. We believe that consumers in many markets are not familiar with our brand and products and believe there is a significant opportunity for GoPro to expand awareness through a range of advertising and promotional programs and campaigns, including social media. Sales and marketing investments will often occur in advance of any sales benefits from these activities, and it may be difficult for us to determine if we are efficiently allocating our resources in this area. Seasonality. Historically, we have experienced the highest levels of revenue in the fourth quarter of the year, coinciding with the holiday shopping season, particularly in the United States and Europe. While we have implemented operational changes aimed at reducing the impact of fourth quarter seasonality on full year performance, timely and effective product introductions and forecasting, whether just prior to the holiday season or otherwise, are critical to our operations and financial performance. See Item 1. Business, above for additional information regarding our business strategy. Components of our Results of Operations Revenue. Our revenue is primarily comprised of product revenue, net of returns and sales incentives (including price protection). Revenue is derived from the sale of our cameras and accessories directly to retailers, as well as through our network of domestic and international distributors, and through gopro.com. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates below and Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding revenue recognition. We plan to adopt the Financial Accounting Standards Board's new revenue standard, Accounting Standards Codification 606 (ASC 606), Revenue from Contracts with Customers, beginning January 1, 2018 which is expected to immaterially change the amount and timing of revenue recognized related to certain sales incentives. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Cost of revenue. Our cost of revenue primarily consists of product costs, including costs of contract manufacturing for production, third-party logistics and procurement costs, warranty repair costs, tooling equipment depreciation, excess and obsolete inventory write-downs, amortization of acquired developed technology, and certain allocated costs related to manufacturing management, facilities, and personnel-related expenses. Operating expenses. We classify our operating expenses into three categories: research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative. Research and development. Our research and development expense consists primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, stock-based compensation and employee benefits. Research and development expense also includes consulting and outside professional services costs, materials, allocated facilities, depreciation, and other supporting overhead expenses associated with the development of our product and service offerings, as well as the amortization of certain acquired intangible assets. Sales and marketing. Our sales and marketing expense consists primarily of advertising and marketing promotions of our products and services and personnel-related costs, including salaries, stock-based 42 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations compensation and employee benefits. Sales and marketing expense also includes POP display expenses and related amortization, sales commissions, trade show and event costs, sponsorship costs, consulting and contractor expenses, and allocated facilities, depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses. General and administrative. Our general and administrative expense consists primarily of personnel-related costs, including salaries, stock-based compensation and employee benefits for our finance, legal, human resources, information technology, and administrative personnel. The expense also includes professional service costs related to accounting, tax, legal services, and allocated facilities, depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses. Results of Operations The following table sets forth the components of our consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods presented, and each component as a percentage of revenue: (dollars in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 Year ended December 31, Revenue Cost of revenue Gross profit Operating expenses: Research and development Sales and marketing General and administrative Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Other income (expense): Interest expense Other income (expense), net Total other expense, net Income (loss) before income taxes Income tax expense Net income (loss) $ 1,179,741 100 % $ 1,185,481 100 % $ 1,619,971 100% 795,211 384,530 229,265 236,581 82,144 547,990 67 33 19 20 7 46 723,561 461,920 358,902 368,620 107,367 834,889 61 39 30 31 9 70 (163,460) (13) (372,969) (31) (13,660) 733 (12,927) (176,387) 6,486 (1) — (1) (14) 1 (2,992) 787 (2,205) (375,174) 43,829 — — — (31) 4 $ (182,873) (15)% $ (419,003) (35)% $ 946,757 673,214 241,694 268,939 107,833 618,466 54,748 (1,575) (588) (2,163) 52,585 16,454 36,131 58 42 15 17 7 38 3 — — — 3 1 2% 43 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Revenue (camera units and dollars in thousands) 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change Camera units shipped 4,303 4,762 6,584 (10)% (28)% Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 Direct channel Percentage of revenue Distribution channel Percentage of revenue Total revenue Americas Percentage of revenue Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Percentage of revenue Asia and Pacific (APAC) Percentage of revenue Total revenue $ $ 634,888 53.8% 544,853 $ $ 650,111 54.8% 535,370 $ $ 841,882 52.0% 778,089 46.2% 45.2% 48.0% $ 1,179,741 $ 1,185,481 $ 1,619,971 $ $ $ 591,879 50.2% 334,872 28.4% 252,990 $ $ $ 619,784 52.3% 366,352 30.9% 199,345 $ $ $ 868,772 53.6% 535,260 33.0% 215,939 21.4% 16.8% 13.4% (2) 2 — % (5)% (9) 27 (23) (31) (27)% (29)% (32) (8) $ 1,179,741 $ 1,185,481 $ 1,619,971 — % (27)% 2017 Compared to 2016. In 2017, we saw an increase in revenue related to our Karma drone which was launched in February 2017, offset by price protection charges of $80.5 million, which resulted in revenue remaining relatively flat for 2017 compared to 2016. Additionally, units shipped in 2017 decreased 10%, reflecting a higher mix of lower price point cameras sold in 2016 compared to 2017. Revenue increased sequentially each quarter of 2017, with the fourth quarter comprising 28% of total 2017 revenue, reflecting the launch of the HERO6 camera preceding the holiday shopping season. The average selling price of units shipped in the fourth quarter of 2017, defined as total revenue divided by unit shipments, increased 4.0% compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. 2016 Compared to 2015. The year-over-year decline in total revenues during 2016 compared to 2015 was due to a 28% decrease in units shipped, reflecting global channel unit sell-through that exceeded sell-in for the first three quarters of 2016 as we worked to reduce channel inventory in preparation for the launch of HERO5 in September 2016. In addition, our revenue in the first half of 2015 benefited from the launch of our HERO4 cameras preceding the 2014 holiday season, whereas there was no major product introduction near the end of 2015. Revenue increased sequentially each quarter of 2016, with the fourth quarter comprising 46% of total 2016 revenue, reflecting the launch of HERO5 cameras and new mounts and accessories preceding the holiday shopping season. The average selling price of units shipped increased 1% year-over-year. We recognized no revenue in 2016 for our Karma drone. Cost of revenue and gross margin (dollars in thousands) Cost of revenue Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Total cost of revenue Gross margin Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ 786,657 $ 719,689 $ 944,304 9% (24)% 1,935 5,985 634 1,616 1,759 497 1,492 961 — $ 795,211 $ 723,561 $ 946,757 20 240 28 10% 8 83 N/A (24)% 32.6% 39.0% 41.6% (640) bps (260) bps 2017 Compared to 2016. Gross margin of 32.6% in 2017 decreased from 39.0% in 2016, or (640) bps. Gross margin in 2017 reflected the impact of camera and drone related price protection, (400) bps, lower gross margins 44 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations from Karma drone sales as compared to camera sales, (143) bps, and inventory and purchase order charges related to Karma and its accessories, (180) bps, partially offset by operational expense improvements. 2016 Compared to 2015. Gross margin of 39.0% in 2016 decreased from 41.6% in 2015, or (260) bps. Gross margin in 2016 reflected an increase in our average cost per unit shipped, which was primarily attributable to the enhanced functionality and improved capability of our new HERO5 cameras (including image stabilization, telemetry, cloud connectivity and voice control) when compared with prior generation offerings, as well as the allocation of fixed overhead costs across significantly fewer units shipped in 2016. This resulted in a (610) bps decrease in gross margin when compared to 2015. In addition, gross margin for 2015 and 2016 was negatively impacted by product charges of approximately $57 million and $8 million, respectively, for excess purchase order commitments, excess inventory and other charges related to end-of-life HERO legacy products. Partially offsetting these charges in 2016, gross margin benefited from the sales of approximately $18 million associated with previously written off legacy camera inventory. The net year-over-year effect of these legacy items was a benefit to gross margin of approximately 350 bps. The year- over-year effect of stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs on gross margin was not material. Research and development (dollars in thousands) Research and development Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ 191,182 $ 295,901 $ 220,516 24,963 3,028 10,092 31,365 14,439 17,197 18,024 3,154 — (35)% (20) (79) (41) (36)% 34% 74 358 N/A 48% Total research and development Percentage of revenue $ 229,265 $ 358,902 $ 241,694 19.4% 30.3% 14.9% 2017 Compared to 2016. The year-over-year decrease of $129.6 million, or 36%, in total research and development expenses in 2017 compared to 2016 reflected a decrease in consulting and professional services costs of $59.7 million, a decrease in cash-based personnel-related costs by $36.7 million in 2017, due to a 23% reduction in global research and development headcount from restructuring actions, and decreases in depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses of $6.7 million. In addition, in 2017, acquisition-related costs decreased $11.4 million due to an intangible impairment charge of $6.0 million related to projects that were discontinued in the third quarter of 2016 and stock-based compensation decreased $6.4 million due to lower employee headcount. See Restructuring costs below for additional information regarding restructuring charges recorded in 2017 and 2016. 2016 Compared to 2015. The year-over-year growth of $117.2 million, or 48%, in total research and development expenses in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily attributable to increases in cash-based personnel-related costs of $45.8 million driven by a 35% growth in average global headcount during 2016, increases in allocated facilities, depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses of $19.3 million and increases in material and equipment costs of $11.5 million. In addition, stock-based compensation increased $13.3 million in 2016 due to higher employee headcount. Acquisition-related costs increased $11.3 million in 2016 due to intangible asset impairment charges of approximately $7 million related to projects that were discontinued in the second half of 2016, as well as increased amortization associated with two acquisitions completed during the first half of 2016. Charges to restructuring are excluded from above. See Restructuring costs below for information regarding restructuring charges of $17.2 million recorded in 2016. The growth in research and development expense in absolute dollars, and as a percentage of revenue, was primarily driven by investments (including increased headcount) to support the development of our cameras, drone, related mounts and accessories and software offerings. 45 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Sales and marketing (dollars in thousands) Sales and marketing Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Total sales and marketing Percentage of revenue Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ 219,036 $ 342,651 $ 255,045 (36)% 10,498 — 7,047 13,883 22 12,064 13,762 132 — (24) (100) (42) $ 236,581 $ 368,620 $ 268,939 (36)% 20.1% 31.1% 16.6% 34% 1 (83) N/A 37% 2017 Compared to 2016. The year-over-year decrease of $132.0 million, or 36%, in total sales and marketing expenses in 2017 compared to 2016, respectively, was primarily attributable to a $73.7 million decrease in advertising and promotional activity of which, $59.0 million was related to advertising, marketing events and sponsorships. Additionally, there was an $8.8 million decrease in consulting and outside professional service costs, an $8.4 million decrease in travel and entertainment, and a $7.2 million decrease in allocated facilities, depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses. Cash-based personnel-related costs decreased by $23.3 million in 2017, driven by a 16% reduction in global sales and marketing headcount. The favorable reductions in sales and marketing expenses in 2017 were primarily due to more focused and strategic marketing efforts in 2017. Charges to restructuring are excluded from above. See Restructuring costs below for information regarding restructuring charges recorded in 2017 and 2016. 2016 Compared to 2015. The year-over-year growth of $99.7 million, or 37.1%, in total sales and marketing expenses in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily attributable to increases in advertising and promotional activity costs of $58.5 million associated with expanded corporate branding campaigns to improve worldwide brand awareness and to support the launch of our HERO5 cameras, Karma drone and related products. Additionally, the year-over-year growth in 2016 was attributable to increases in allocated facilities, depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses of $10.2 million and increases in cash-based personnel-related costs of $11.4 million, driven by 16% growth in average global headcount during 2016. Charges to restructuring are excluded from above. See Restructuring costs below for information regarding restructuring charges of $12.1 million recorded in 2016. General and administrative (dollars in thousands) General and administrative Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Total general and administrative expenses Percentage of revenue Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ 65,788 $ 70,247 $ 13,859 (22) 2,519 22,663 1,126 13,331 59,308 47,402 1,123 — (6)% (39) (102) (81) 18 % (52) — N/A $ 82,144 $ 107,367 $ 107,833 (23)% — % 7.0% 9.1% 6.7% 2017 Compared to 2016. The year-over-year decrease of $25.2 million, or 23%, in total general and administrative expenses in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily attributable to a $10.8 million decrease in restructuring costs, of which $8.8 million was due to restructuring charges for executive stock-based compensation, an $8.8 million decrease in stock-based compensation, of which $5.8 million was due to the timing of expense recognition attributable to the CEO RSUs (see Note 7 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), and a $1.1 million decrease in acquisition-related costs due to higher legal costs incurred in conjunction with our 2016 acquisitions. Cash-based personnel-related costs decreased by $3.2 million year-over- year, driven by a 10% reduction in global general and administrative headcount. See Restructuring costs below 46 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information regarding restructuring charges recorded in 2017 and 2016. 2016 Compared to 2015. General and administrative expenses were approximately flat year-over-year. Stock- based compensation decreased $17.3 million in 2016 compared to 2015 due to the timing of expense recognition attributable to the CEO RSUs (see Note 7 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), which was partially offset by restructuring related charges in 2016 of $13.3 million, as well as increases in consulting and outside professional service costs of $3.7 million, and increases in allocated facilities, depreciation and other supporting overhead expenses of $3.2 million. Cash-based personnel-related costs were approximately flat year-over-year. See Restructuring costs below for additional information regarding restructuring charges recorded in 2016. Restructuring costs First quarter 2018 restructuring plan. On January 2, 2018, we approved a restructuring plan to further reduce future operating expense and better align resources around our long-term business strategy. The restructuring provided for a reduction of our global workforce of approximately 21%, the closure of our aerial group and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. We estimate that we will incur total aggregate charges of approximately $23 million to $33 million for the restructuring. We expect actions associated with the restructuring will be substantially completed in the first quarter of 2018. First quarter 2017 restructuring plan. On March 15, 2017, we approved a restructuring plan that provided for a reduction of our global workforce by approximately 270 positions, and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. Under the first quarter 2017 restructuring plan, we recorded restructuring charges of $17.0 million, including $10.3 million related to severance, and $6.7 million related to accelerated depreciation and other charges. The actions associated with the first quarter 2017 restructuring plan were completed by the fourth quarter of 2017. Fourth quarter 2016 restructuring plan. On November 29, 2016, we approved a restructuring plan that provided for a reduction in our global workforce of approximately 15%, the closure of our entertainment group and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. Under the fourth quarter 2016 restructuring plan, we recorded restructuring charges of $40.7 million, including $3.2 million related to severance and facilities contract terminations during 2017. The actions associated with the fourth quarter 2016 restructuring plan were completed by March 31, 2017, with only small incremental charges recorded through December 31, 2017. First quarter 2016 restructuring plan. On January 12, 2016, we approved a restructuring plan that provided for a reduction in our global workforce of approximately 7%. Under the first quarter 2016 restructuring plan, we recorded restructuring charges of $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2016, which primarily included cash-based severance costs. We completed this plan at the end of the first quarter of 2016 and all costs have been paid. No charges were recorded in periods after March 31, 2016. See Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other income (expense) (dollars in thousands) Interest expense Other income (expense), net Total other expense, net Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ $ (13,660) $ (2,992) $ (1,575) 733 787 (588) (12,927) $ (2,205) $ (2,163) 357% (7) 486% 90% (234) 2% 2017 Compared to 2016. Total other expense, net, increased by $10.7 million in 2017 compared to 2016, primarily attributable to interest expense and the accretion of debt premium to the face value on our Convertible Notes, which were issued in April 2017. 2016 Compared to 2015. There were no material changes to total other income (expense), net in 2016 as compared to 2015. 47 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Income taxes (dollars in thousands) Income tax expense Effective tax rate Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ 6,486 $ 43,829 $ 16,454 (85)% 166% 3.7% 11.7% 31.3% 2017 Compared to 2016. We recorded an income tax provision of $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 3.7%. Our income tax provision in 2017 was principally composed of tax expenses incurred on pre-tax income in profitable foreign jurisdictions. While we incurred pre-tax losses in the United States and certain lower-rate jurisdictions, we do not expect to recognize any significant tax benefits on pre-tax losses in the United States due to the valuation allowance recorded against our U.S. deferred tax assets. Our 2016 effective tax rate of 11.7% resulted from the tax benefit of $131.3 million on pre-tax book losses of $375.2 million, offset by the establishment of a valuation allowance of $101.9 million on U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets, as well as the tax expenses incurred on pre-tax income in profitable foreign jurisdictions. See Note 9 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation between the U.S. statutory tax rate and our effective tax rates. 2016 compared to 2015. The lower effective tax rate in 2016 compared to 2015 resulted from a federal statutory tax benefit of $131.3 million on pre-tax book losses of $375.2 million, offset by the establishment of a valuation allowance of $101.9 million on all U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets, as well as income taxes paid at lower rates in profitable foreign jurisdictions (primarily related to our wholly owned subsidiaries in Europe). We recorded a full valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets because, based upon the weight of then available evidence, we believed that was not more likely than not that our U.S. deferred tax assets would be realized in the then foreseeable future. Our provision for income taxes in each period has differed from the tax computed at U.S. federal statutory tax rates due to changes in our valuation allowance, the effect of non-U.S. operations, deductible and non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, state taxes, federal research and development tax credits and other adjustments. See Note 9 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation between the U.S. statutory tax rate and our effective tax rates. Quarterly results of operations The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly consolidated results of operations for each of the eight quarterly periods ended December 31, 2017. (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Dec. 31, 2017 Sept. 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 March 31, 2017 Dec. 31, 2016 Sept. 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 Three months ended Revenue (1) Gross profit (2) Operating expenses (3) Net income (loss) Net income (loss) per share: $ 334,796 $ 329,805 $ 296,526 $ 218,614 $ 540,621 $ 240,569 $ 220,755 $ 183,536 79,786 138,097 130,546 122,497 105,632 130,615 68,566 156,781 212,135 238,703 97,069 93,002 59,714 212,658 202,379 181,149 $ (55,848) $ 14,661 $ (30,536) $ (111,150) $ (115,709) $ (104,068) $ (91,767) $ (107,459) Basic Diluted $ $ (0.41) $ (0.41) $ 0.11 0.10 $ $ (0.22) $ (0.22) $ (0.78) $ (0.78) $ (0.82) $ (0.82) $ (0.74) $ (0.74) $ (0.66) $ (0.66) $ (0.78) (0.78) (1) (2) (3) Included in revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 was a reduction of approximately $80 million for price protection and marketing development funds incurred in connection with the reduction of our camera and drone selling price. Included in cost of revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 were charges of $8 million for excess purchase order commitments, excess inventory and obsolete tooling, relating to the end-of-life of our entry-level HERO products. Included in operating expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016 were restructuring charges of approximately $13.6 million, $36.4 million and $6.2 million, respectively. 48 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources The following table presents selected financial information as of December 31, 2017 and 2016: (dollars in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents Marketable securities Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities Percentage of total assets December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ $ 202,504 44,886 247,390 $ $ 29% 192,114 25,839 217,953 24% Our primary source of cash is receipts from revenue. Other sources of cash were net proceeds from the issuance of debt, employee participation in the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of employee stock options. The primary uses of cash are for inventory procurement, payroll-related expenses, general operating expenses, including marketing and office rent, and other costs of revenue. Other uses of cash include purchases of property and equipment and business acquisitions. As of December 31, 2017, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $247.4 million were up $29.4 million, or 13.5%, compared to $218.0 million at December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to net proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes and collections of accounts receivable, offset by the payments on accounts payable, personnel-related costs and liabilities primarily for inventory obligations. We used cash in operations of $36.9 million and received proceeds of $91.0 million from issuance of convertible notes, net of the prepaid forward transaction and issuance costs. As of December 31, 2017, $108.3 million of cash was held by our foreign subsidiaries. Convertible Notes On April 12, 2017, we issued $175 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes in a private placement to purchasers for resale to qualified institutional buyers. The Notes mature on April 15, 2022, unless earlier repurchased or converted into shares of Class A common stock subject to certain conditions. The Notes are convertible into cash, shares of the Class A common stock, or a combination thereof, at our election, at an initial conversion rate of 94.0071 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $10.64 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment. We pay interest on the Notes semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year with interest payments beginning on October 15, 2017. Proceeds received from the issuance of the Notes were allocated between a liability component (long-term debt) and an equity component (additional paid-in capital). The fair value of the liability component was measured using rates determined for similar debt instruments without a conversion feature. In connection with the Notes offering, we entered into a prepaid forward stock repurchase transaction agreement (Prepaid Forward) with a financial institution. Pursuant to the Prepaid Forward, we used approximately $78 million of the proceeds from the offering of the Notes to pay the prepayment amount. The aggregate number of our Class A common stock underlying the Prepaid Forward is approximately 9.2 million shares (based on The Nasdaq closing sale price of our Class A common stock on April 6, 2017). The expiration date for the Prepaid Forward is April 15, 2022, although it may be settled earlier in whole or in part. Upon settlement of the Prepaid Forward, at expiration or upon any early settlement, the forward counterparty will deliver to us the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying the Prepaid Forward or the portion thereof being settled early. The shares purchased under the Prepaid Forward were treated as treasury stock on the consolidated balance sheet (and not outstanding for purposes of the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share), but remain outstanding for corporate law purposes, including for purposes of any future stockholders’ votes, until the forward counterparty delivers the shares underlying the Prepaid Forward to us. We intend to use the net proceeds from the Convertible Senior Notes offering of approximately $91 million for general corporate purposes. 49 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity We believe, based on our most current projections, that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, and amounts available under our credit facility, will be sufficient to address our working capital needs, capital expenditures, outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months. • We expect that operating expenses and inventory purchases will constitute a material use of our cash balances. We intend to continue to manage our operating activities in line with our existing cash and available financial resources. We believe the restructuring actions and other cost saving initiatives we have taken will enable us to continue to significantly reduce our operating expenses to below $400 million on a non-GAAP basis for the full year 2018. • We expect to spend significantly less on capital expenditures in 2018 compared to 2017. Our actual future capital requirements may vary materially from those currently planned and will depend on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts and other business initiatives, the timing of new product introductions, market acceptance of our products and overall economic conditions. In February 2018, we received an income tax refund of $32.9 million. • • In March 2016, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that provided for a secured revolving credit facility under which we could borrow up to an aggregate of $250.0 million. Our credit facility terminates in March 2021. (See Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.) • We ended the year with $247.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. Additionally, since March 31, 2017, we generated $81.0 million in cash, excluding the net proceeds from our convertible debt offering in April 2017. • We have completed acquisitions in the past and we may evaluate additional possible acquisitions of, or strategic investments in, businesses, products and technologies that are complementary to our business, which may require the use of cash. In the future, we may require additional funding to respond to business opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing under our credit facility, or other sources, when we require it, our ability to grow or support our business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited. In the event additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us or at all. Summary of Cash Flows The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated: (in thousands) Net cash provided by (used in): Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Cash flows from operating activities Year ended December 31, 2017 vs 2016 2016 vs 2015 2017 2016 2015 % Change % Change $ $ $ (36,853) $ (107,753) $ 157,611 (43,097) $ 19,286 $ (211,977) 88,594 $ 1,955 $ 15,665 (66)% (323)% 4,432 % (168)% (109%) (88)% Cash used in operating activities of $36.9 million was attributable to an adjusted net loss of $75.9 million (net loss adjusted for non-cash expenses of $107.0 million) partially offset by a cash inflow of $39.1 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities. Cash inflow of $39.1 million consisted of a $52.3 million decrease in accounts receivable, offset by changes in other assets and liabilities. The decrease in cash used in operating activities of $70.9 million in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to a decrease of $93.7 million in net assets and liabilities, $41.1 million in deferred taxes and $18.3 million in stock-based compensation expense, offset by $236.1 million less losses in 2017 compared to 2016. 50 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Cash used in operating activities of $107.8 million in 2016 was attributable to an adjusted net loss of $240.5 million (net loss adjusted for non-cash expenses of $178.5 million) partially offset by net cash inflow of $132.7 million from changes in operating assets and liabilities. Cash inflow related to changes in operating assets and liabilities consisted of increased accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $142.9 million, primarily associated with inventory procurement in the fourth quarter of 2016 to support customer demand during the holiday season, partially offset by other changes in assets and liabilities. The decrease in operating cash flows of $265.4 million in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a year-over-year decline in total cash inflows associated with lower revenues coupled with a year-over-year increase in cash outflows associated with growth in total operating expenses. Cash flows from investing activities Our primary investing activities consist of purchases, maturities and sales of marketable securities and purchases of property and equipment. Cash used in investing activities was $43.1 million in 2017 resulting from the purchases of marketable securities of $52.3 million and $24.1 million for net purchases of property and equipment partially offset by maturities and sales of marketable securities of $33.3 million. Cash provided by investing activities was $19.3 million in 2016 resulting from net maturities and sales of marketable securities of $167.3 million to be used in operations, offset by $104.4 million in net cash used for acquisitions and $43.6 million for purchases of property and equipment, net. We had no purchases of marketable securities during 2016. Cash flows from financing activities Our primary financing activities in 2017 consisted of the issuance of convertible notes and the issuance of equity securities under our common stock plans. Cash provided by financing activities was $88.6 million in 2017 resulting from $175.0 million from the issuance of Notes, and $9.8 million received from stock purchases made through our ESPP and employee stock option exercises, partially offset by $78.0 million for the Prepaid Forward, $12.1 million in tax payments for net RSU settlements and $6.0 million paid for debt issuance costs. Cash provided by financing activities was $2.0 million in 2016 resulting from $2.8 million in net proceeds received from stock purchases made through our ESPP and employee stock option exercises, as well as $3.5 million of excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation, partially offset by payments of $3.3 million for costs incurred in the first quarter to secure our credit facility and payments of $1.0 million for deferred acquisition- related consideration. Contractual Commitments Contractual obligations. As of December 31, 2017, our total undiscounted future expected payment obligations under our agreements with terms longer than one year are approximately $313.3 million, including $175.0 million for our Convertible Senior Notes, $128.2 million for operating leases, $7.3 million for sponsorship agreements and $2.8 million for other multi-year agreements. See Note 5 for discussion regarding our Convertible Senior Notes and Note 11 for discussion regarding facility leases and other contractual commitments in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Off-balance sheet arrangements. During the periods presented, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated organizations or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Indemnifications. We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers which require us to indemnify our directors and executive officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service. In addition, in the normal course of business, we enter into agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide for general indemnification. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to our limited history with prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. To date, the payments we have made under these agreements have not had a material effect on our operating results, 51 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations financial position or cash flows. However, we may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification agreements. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can significantly impact the amounts we report as assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and the related disclosures. Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to understanding our historical and future performance as these policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity. Our senior management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our board of directors. Revenue recognition Revenue is primarily comprised of product revenue, net of returns and sales incentives. We derive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of cameras, drones, mounts and accessories and the related implied post contract support, or PCS. We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: • Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists. Contracts or sales orders from our distributors, resellers or online customers are generally used to determine the existence of an arrangement. • Delivery has occurred. We consider delivery to have occurred once title and risk of loss has been transferred. Shipping documents and customer acceptance, when applicable, are used to verify delivery. • The sales price is fixed or determinable. We assess whether the sales price is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction and whether the sales price is subject to refund or adjustment. • Collectability is reasonably assured. We assess collectability based primarily on the creditworthiness of the customer as determined by credit analysis, the customer’s payment history and other relevant factors. For most of our revenue, these criteria are met at the time the product is shipped. For customers who purchase products directly from the Company's website, revenue is deferred until delivery to the customer's address because we retain a portion of the risk of loss on these sales during transit. Our standard terms and conditions of sale for non-web based sales do not allow for product returns other than under warranty. However, we grant limited rights to return product for certain large retailers and distributors. Estimates of expected future product returns are recognized at the time of sale based on analyses of historical return trends by customer class. Upon recognition, we reduce revenue and cost of sales for the estimated returns. Return trends are influenced by product life cycles, new product introductions, market acceptance of products, product sell-through, the type of customer, seasonality and other factors. Return rates may fluctuate over time, but are sufficiently predictable to allow us to estimate expected future product returns. Actual returns in any future period could differ from our estimates, which could impact the revenue that we report. Our camera and drone sales are multiple element arrangements that generally include the following three separate units of accounting: a) a hardware component (camera, drone and/or accessories) and the embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware delivered at the time of sale, b) the implicit right to our downloadable free apps and software solutions, and c) the implied right for the customer to receive PCS. PCS includes the right to receive, on a when and if available basis, future unspecified firmware upgrades and features as well as bug fixes, and email and telephone support. Judgment is required to properly identify the accounting units of multiple element arrangements and to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated among the units. We account for each element separately and allocate revenue based on our best estimate of the selling price (BESP). Our process for determining BESP considers multiple factors that may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable, including: the level of support provided to customers, estimated costs to provide our support, the amount of time and cost that is allocated to our efforts to 52 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations develop the undelivered elements, and market trends in the pricing for similar offerings. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales price between the units of accounting will not affect the amount of total revenue ultimately recognized for a particular sales arrangement, any material changes in these allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We provide our customers with sales incentives through various programs, including cooperative advertising, marketing development funds and other incentives. Sales incentives are recorded as a reduction to revenue in the period the incentives are offered to our customers or the related revenue is recognized, whichever is later. In addition, we offer price protection to certain customers which is recorded as a reduction of revenue at the date of sale. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We plan to adopt the Financial Accounting Standards Board's new revenue standard, ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, beginning January 1, 2018 which is expected to immaterially change the amount and timing of revenue recognized related to certain sales incentives. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Inventory valuation and liability for purchase commitments Inventory consists of finished goods and component parts and is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value on a first-in, first-out basis. Our inventory balances were $150.6 million and $167.2 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our assessment of market value requires the use of estimates regarding the net realizable value of our inventory balances, including an assessment of excess or obsolete inventory. We determine excess or obsolete inventory based on multiple factors, including an estimate of the future demand for our products within a specified time horizon, generally 12 months, product life cycle status, product development plans and current sales levels. We also record a liability for noncancelable purchase commitments with contract manufacturers for quantities in excess of our future demand forecasts consistent with the valuation of our excess and obsolete inventory. The estimates used for future demand are also used for near-term capacity planning and inventory purchases and are consistent with our revenue forecast assumptions. If our demand forecast is greater than the actual demand, the amount of our loss will be impacted by our contractual ability to reduce inventory purchases and commitments from our contract manufacturers. Our assumptions of future demand for our products are inherently uncertain, and if there were to be an abrupt and substantial decline in demand for one or more of our products or a change in our product development plans, we may be required to increase our inventory write-downs and our liability for purchase commitments that would adversely affect our results of operations in the period when such write-downs and/or excess commitments are recorded. Warranty We generally provide a 12-month warranty coverage on all of our products except in the EU where we provide a 24-month warranty. An extended warranty is also available for a fee under our GoPro Care program which also provides for accidental damage coverage along with other perquisites. Our standard warranty provides for repair or replacement of the associated products during the warranty period. We establish a liability for estimated product warranty costs at the time product revenue is recognized. The warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates and the related use of materials, labor costs and freight incurred in correcting any product failure. Should actual product failure rates, use of materials or other costs differ from our estimates, additional warranty liabilities could be required, which could materially affect our results of operations. Income taxes We are subject to income taxes in the United States and multiple foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rates differ from the U.S. federal statutory rate, primarily due to changes in our valuation allowance, the effect of non-U.S. operations, deductible and non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, state taxes, federal research and development tax credits and other adjustments. Our effective tax rate was 3.7%, 11.7% and 31.3% in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The calculation of our provision for income taxes involves the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments while taking into account current tax laws, our interpretation of current tax laws and possible outcomes of future tax audits. We review our tax positions quarterly and adjust the balances as new information becomes available. Our income tax rate is materially affected by the tax rates that apply to our foreign earnings. As of December 31, 2017, $4.5 million of earnings had been indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S., 53 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations primarily in active non-U.S. business operations. We do not intend to repatriate these earnings to fund U.S. operations and, accordingly, we do not provide for U.S. federal income and foreign withholding tax on these earnings. See also Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) discussion below. Deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets arise because of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, as well as from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We evaluate the recoverability of these future tax deductions and credits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including reversal of taxable temporary differences, forecast operating earnings and available tax planning strategies. As of December 31, 2017, we had a valuation allowance on all of our U.S. net deferred tax assets with the exception of a refundable AMT credit of $0.2 million based on our assessment that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized. In addition, due to the U.S. enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) on December 22, 2017, U.S. deferred tax assets were revalued at the statutory rate of 21% which will be effective January 1, 2018, with a corresponding valuation allowance adjustment resulting in no impact to our Consolidated Statement of Operations. Uncertain tax positions. We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. We file annual income tax returns in multiple taxing jurisdictions around the world and a number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited by the relevant tax authorities and finally resolved. We have established reserves to address potential exposures related to tax positions that could be challenged by tax authorities. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our reserves reflect the most likely outcome. Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected if actual earnings are different than our estimates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets or liabilities, outcomes resulting from income tax examinations, or by changes or interpretations in tax laws, regulations or accounting principles. We were under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2012 through 2015 tax years. IRS audit fieldwork was completed and the claimed income tax refund of $32.9 million relating to the carryback of 2014 and 2015 net operating losses was approved by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) on December 18, 2017. We received $32.9 million in February 2018. See also Note 14 Subsequent Events for additional information. U.S. Tax Reform. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017, enacted on December 22, 2017, contains significant changes to U.S. tax law, including lowering the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21%, implementing a territorial tax system, and imposing a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The TCJA reduces the U.S. federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, we recorded a $74.9 million tax expense representing the detriment of remeasuring its U.S. deferred tax asset at the lower 21% statutory tax rate, as well as a corresponding full valuation allowance for the same amount, resulting in no impact to our Consolidated Statement of Operations. The TCJA also implements a territorial tax system. Under the territorial tax system, in general, our foreign earnings will no longer be subject to tax in the U.S. As part of transitioning to the territorial tax system the TCJA includes a mandatory deemed repatriation of all undistributed foreign earnings that are subject to a U.S. income tax. We estimate that the deemed repatriation will not result in any additional U.S. income tax. This preliminary estimate may be impacted by a number of additional considerations, including, but not limited to, the issuance of final regulations and our ongoing analysis of the new law. In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 Income Tax Accounting Implications of the TCJA (SAB 118), which allows us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. Since the Tax Act was passed late in the fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing guidance and accounting interpretation are expected over the next 12 months, we consider the accounting of the transition tax, deferred tax re-measurements and other items to be incomplete due to the forthcoming guidance and our ongoing analysis of final year-end data and tax positions. We expect to complete our analysis within the measurement period in accordance with SAB 118. 54 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Stock-based compensation We measure and recognize stock-based compensation based on the fair value measurement for all stock-based awards granted to employees and directors over the service period for awards expected to vest. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We use the Black-Scholes option- pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan options. The determination of the grant date fair value of options using an option-pricing model is affected by our common stock fair value as well as assumptions regarding a number of variables, of which the most subjective were estimated as follows: • Expected Term. We do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time stock-based awards have been exercisable since the completion of our IPO in July 2014. As a result, we used the simplified method to calculate the expected term estimate based on the vesting and contractual terms of the option. Under the simplified method, the expected term is equal to the average of the stock-based awards weighted average vesting period and its contractual term. • Volatility. The expected stock price volatility for our common stock was estimated by taking the average of our historic volatility and the historical volatility of the common stock of a group of comparable publicly traded companies over a period equivalent to the expected term. The estimation of awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. These adjustments have not been material to date. Goodwill and acquired intangible assets When we acquire a business, we allocate the purchase price to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets, with the residual of the purchase price recorded as goodwill. The determination of the fair value of the intangible assets acquired involves significant judgments and estimates. These judgments can include, but are not limited to, the cash flows that an asset is expected to generate in the future, technology obsolescence, and the appropriate weighted average cost of capital. Our estimate of the fair value of certain assets may differ materially from that determined by others who use different assumptions or utilize different business models. We perform an annual assessment of our goodwill during the fourth quarter to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry demand, that would indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of our single reporting unit would be reduced below its carrying amount. If further testing is deemed necessary, we perform a two-step process. The first step involves comparing the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying value. The second step, if necessary, measures the amount of impairment, if any, by comparing the carrying value of the goodwill to its implied fair value. As of December 31, 2017, we determined that no impairment of the carrying value of goodwill was required. 55 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Recent Accounting Pronouncements Refer to Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1 to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Non-GAAP Financial Measures We report net income (loss) and diluted net income (loss) per share in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and on a non-GAAP basis. Additionally, we report non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA. Non-GAAP items exclude, where applicable, the effects of stock-based compensation, acquisition-related costs, restructuring costs, non-cash interest expense and the tax impact of these items. We use non-GAAP financial measures to help us understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends, to prepare and approve our annual budget, and to develop short-term and long-term operational plans. We believe that these measures provide useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as an alternative to, the measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, and are not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. We believe that these non-GAAP measures, when read in conjunction with our GAAP financials, provide useful information to investors by facilitating: • • • the comparability of our on-going operating results over the periods presented; the ability to identify trends in our underlying business; and the comparison of our operating results against analyst financial models and operating results of other public companies that supplement their GAAP results with non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. Some of these limitations are: • • • • • • adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments that reduce cash available to us; adjusted EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization and, although these are non-cash charges, the property and equipment being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect any cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements; adjusted EBITDA excludes the amortization of POP display assets because it is a non-cash charge, and is treated similarly to depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of acquired intangible assets; adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income (loss) exclude the impairment of intangible assets because it is a non-cash charge that is inconsistent in amount and frequency; adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income (loss) exclude restructuring costs which primarily include severance-related costs, stock-based compensation expenses and facilities consolidation charges recorded in connection with restructuring actions announced in the first and fourth quarters of 2016 and in the first quarter of 2017. These expenses do not reflect expected future operating expenses and do not contribute to a meaningful evaluation of current operating performance or comparisons to the operating performance in other periods; adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP net income (loss) exclude stock-based compensation expense related to equity awards granted primarily to our workforce. We exclude stock-based compensation expense because we believe that the non-GAAP financial measures excluding this item provide meaningful supplemental information regarding operational performance. In particular, we note that companies calculate stock-based compensation expense for the variety of award types that they employ using different valuation methodologies and subjective assumptions. These non-cash charges are not factored into our internal evaluation of net income (loss) as we believe their inclusion would hinder our ability to assess core operational performance; • non-GAAP net income (loss) excludes acquisition-related costs including the amortization of acquired intangible assets (primarily consisting of acquired technology), the impairment of acquired intangible assets (if 56 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations applicable), as well as third-party transaction costs incurred for legal and other professional services. These costs are not factored into our evaluation of potential acquisitions, or of our performance after completion of the acquisitions, because these costs are not related to our core operating performance or reflective of ongoing operating results in the period, and the frequency and amount of such costs are inconsistent and vary significantly based on the timing and magnitude of our acquisition transactions and the maturities of the businesses being acquired; non-GAAP net income (loss) excludes non-cash interest expense. In connection with issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes in April 2017, we are required to recognize non-cash interest expense in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance for convertible debt that may be settled in cash; non-GAAP net income (loss) includes income tax adjustments. Beginning in the first quarter of 2017, we implemented a cash-based non-GAAP tax expense approach (based upon expected annual cash payments for income taxes) for evaluating operating performance as well as for planning and forecasting purposes. This non-GAAP tax approach eliminates the effects of period specific items, which can vary in size and frequency and does not necessarily reflect our long-term operations. Historically, we computed a non-GAAP tax rate based on non-GAAP pre-tax income on a quarterly basis, which considered the income tax effects of the adjustments above; and • • • other companies may calculate these non-GAAP financial measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. The following tables present a reconciliation of net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA: (in thousands) Net loss Income tax expense (benefit) Interest income, net Depreciation and amortization POP display amortization Stock-based compensation Impairment of intangible assets Restructuring costs Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands) Net income (loss) Income tax expense Interest expense Depreciation and amortization POP display amortization Stock-based compensation Impairment of intangible assets Restructuring costs Adjusted EBITDA Three months ended December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ (55,848) $ (115,709) (6,943) 4,163 9,218 4,342 15,020 — 3,504 $ (26,544) $ 87,391 1,022 11,100 4,944 17,926 1,088 36,581 44,343 Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $ (182,873) $ (419,003) $ 36,131 $ 128,088 $ 6,486 12,804 41,478 19,190 51,255 — 20,292 43,829 1,401 41,639 19,623 69,527 7,088 43,089 16,454 234 28,981 16,829 80,680 — — 52,887 5,038 17,945 18,023 71,399 — — 60,578 30,751 6,018 12,034 13,458 10,887 — — $ (31,368) $ (192,807) $ 179,309 $ 293,380 $ 133,726 57 GoPro, Inc. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following tables present a reconciliation of net loss to non-GAAP net income (loss): (in thousands) Net loss Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Non-cash interest expense Income tax adjustments (1) Non-GAAP net income (loss) Non-GAAP earnings (loss) per share GAAP shares for diluted net income (loss) per share Add: effect of potentially dilutive shares Non-GAAP shares for diluted net income (loss) per share Three months ended December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ $ $ (55,848) $ (115,709) 15,020 2,360 3,504 1,979 (8,334) (41,319) $ (0.30) $ 136,886 — 136,886 17,926 3,700 36,581 — 99,869 42,367 0.29 141,063 5,198 146,261 (in thousands) Net income (loss) Stock-based compensation Acquisition-related costs Restructuring costs Non-cash interest expense Income tax adjustments (1) Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 $ (182,873) $ (419,003) $ 36,131 $ 128,088 $ 51,255 8,991 20,292 5,345 1,123 69,527 17,346 43,089 — 80,680 5,370 — — 87,794 (10,617) 71,399 1,133 — — (11,707) 188,913 1.32 $ $ $ $ 60,578 10,887 1,106 — — (3,745) 68,826 0.50 98,941 30,523 8,900 Non-GAAP net income (loss) Non-GAAP diluted earnings (loss) per share $ $ (95,867) $ (201,247) $ 111,564 (0.69) $ (1.44) $ 0.76 GAAP shares for diluted net income (loss) per share Add: preferred shares conversion Add: initial public offering shares Non-GAAP shares for diluted net income (loss) per 138,056 139,425 146,486 123,630 — — — — — — 15,136 4,414 share 138,056 139,425 146,486 143,180 138,364 (1) Beginning in the first quarter of 2017, we implemented a cash-based non-GAAP expense approach (based upon expected annual cash payments for income taxes) for evaluating operating performance as well as for planning and forecasting purposes. This non-GAAP approach eliminates the effects of period specific items, which can vary in size and frequency and does not necessarily reflect our long-term operations. Historically, we computed a non-GAAP tax rate based on non-GAAP pre-tax income on a quarterly basis, which considered the income tax effects of the adjustments above. 58 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks primarily include foreign currency and interest rate risks as follows: Foreign currency risk. To date, the majority of our product sales and inventory purchases have been denominated in U.S. dollars. We therefore have had insignificant foreign currency risk associated with these two activities. The functional currency of all of our entities is the U.S. dollar. Our operations outside of the United States hold foreign denominated cash balances and incur a majority of their operating expenses in foreign currencies, principally the Euro and the British Pound. Our results of operations and cash flows are, therefore, subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. However, we believe that the exposure to foreign currency fluctuation from operating expenses is immaterial at this time as the related costs do not constitute a significant portion of our total expenses. As we grow our operations, or if foreign currency held in our U.S. dollar functional currency entities increases, our exposure to foreign currency risk could become more significant. To date, we have not entered into any material foreign currency exchange contracts. For assets and liabilities denominated in other currencies, we do not believe that the effects of a 10% shift in exchange rates between those currencies and the U.S. dollar would have a material effect on our results of operations from such a shift. Interest rate risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates primarily relates to our cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. Our cash equivalents and marketable securities are comprised primarily of money market funds, U.S. treasury securities, U.S. agency securities, commercial paper and corporate debt securities. The primary objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal and provide liquidity without significantly increasing risk. Our cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the relatively short-term nature of our investment portfolio, we do not believe that an immediate 10% increase in interest rates would have a material effect on the fair value of our investment portfolio. The fair value of our Senior Convertible Notes is subject to interest rate risk, market risk and other factors due to the convertible feature. The fair value of the Notes will generally increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. In addition, the fair value of the Notes will generally increase as our Class A common stock price increases and will generally decrease as the common stock price declines. The interest and market value changes affect the fair value of the Notes but do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations due to the fixed nature of the debt obligation. 59 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data GoPro, Inc. Index to consolidated financial statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Operations Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Financial Statement Schedule for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Page 61 63 64 65 66 68 93 The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8, is included in Part II, Item 7 under the caption Quarterly Results of Operations, which is incorporated herein by reference. 60 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of GoPro, Inc. Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GoPro, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO. Change in Accounting Principle As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for certain elements of its employee share-based payments in 2017. Basis for Opinions The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. 61 Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP San Jose, California February 16, 2018 We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2011. 62 GoPro, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except par values) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Marketable securities Accounts receivable, net Inventory Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total current assets Property and equipment, net Intangible assets, net Goodwill Other long-term assets Total assets Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Deferred revenue Total current liabilities Long-term taxes payable Long-term debt Other long-term liabilities Total liabilities Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 11) Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.0001 par value, 500,000 Class A shares authorized, 101,034 and 104,647 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; 150,000 Class B shares authorized, 35,966 and 36,712 shares issued and outstanding, respectively Treasury stock, at cost, 10,710 and 1,545 shares, respectively Accumulated deficit Total stockholders’ equity December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ 202,504 $ 44,886 112,935 150,551 62,811 573,687 68,587 24,499 146,459 37,014 850,246 $ 138,257 $ 213,030 19,244 370,531 21,188 130,048 29,774 551,541 $ $ 192,114 25,839 164,553 167,192 38,115 587,813 76,509 33,530 146,459 78,329 922,640 205,028 211,323 14,388 430,739 26,386 — 18,570 475,695 — — 854,452 (113,613) (442,134) 298,705 757,226 (35,613) (274,668) 446,945 922,640 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 850,246 $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 63 GoPro, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except per share data) 2017 2016 2015 Year ended December 31, Revenue Cost of revenue Gross profit Operating expenses: Research and development Sales and marketing General and administrative Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Other income (expense): Interest expense Other income (expense), net Total other expense, net Income (loss) before income taxes Income tax expense Net Income (loss) Net income (loss) per share: Basic Diluted $ 1,179,741 $ 1,185,481 $ 1,619,971 795,211 384,530 229,265 236,581 82,144 547,990 723,561 461,920 358,902 368,620 107,367 834,889 (163,460) (372,969) (13,660) 733 (12,927) (176,387) 6,486 (2,992) 787 (2,205) (375,174) 43,829 (182,873) $ (419,003) $ 946,757 673,214 241,694 268,939 107,833 618,466 54,748 (1,575) (588) (2,163) 52,585 16,454 36,131 (1.32) $ (1.32) $ (3.01) $ (3.01) $ 0.27 0.25 $ $ $ Shares used to compute net income (loss) per share: Basic Diluted 138,056 138,056 139,425 139,425 134,595 146,486 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 64 GoPro, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity Common stock and additional paid-in capital Treasury stock Shares Amount Amount Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) Stockholders’ equity 129,115 $ 533,000 $ — $ 108,204 $ 641,204 (in thousands) Balances at December 31, 2014 Common stock issued under employee benefit plans, net of shares withheld for tax Taxes paid related to net share settlements Retirement of common stock Repurchase of outstanding common stock Stock-based compensation expense Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation Net income 14,249 36,413 — (13,943) (5,218) (1,545) — — — — — 80,583 27,258 — — — — (35,613) — — — Balances at December 31, 2015 136,601 663,311 (35,613) Common stock issued under employee benefit plans, net of shares withheld for tax Taxes paid related to net share settlements Shares issued to third-party vendor for services Stock-based compensation expense Stock-based compensation expense related to restructuring Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation Net loss 3,936 — 822 — — — — 10,103 (6,889) 7,297 69,499 15,566 (1,661) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 36,131 144,335 — — — — — — 36,413 (13,943) — (35,613) 80,583 27,258 36,131 772,033 10,103 (6,889) 7,297 69,499 15,566 (1,661) (419,003) (419,003) Balances at December 31, 2016 141,359 757,226 (35,613) (274,668) 446,945 Common stock issued under employee benefit plans, net of shares withheld for tax Taxes paid related to net share settlements Stock-based compensation expense (Note 7) Repurchase of common stock under Prepaid Forward contract (Note 5) Issuance of Convertible Note (Note 5) Cumulative effect of adoption of new ASU Net loss 4,807 — — 9,732 (12,118) 54,037 — — — (9,166) (1) (78,000) — — — 45,211 365 — — — — — — — — — 15,407 9,732 (12,118) 54,037 (78,001) 45,211 15,772 (182,873) (182,873) Balances at December 31, 2017 137,000 $ 854,452 $ (113,613) $ (442,134) $ 298,705 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 65 GoPro, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) Operating activities: Net income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Stock-based compensation Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation (1) Deferred income taxes Non-cash restructuring charges Non-cash interest expense Impairment of intangible assets Other Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable, net Inventory Prepaid expenses and other assets Accounts payable and other liabilities Deferred revenue Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment, net Purchases of marketable securities Maturities of marketable securities Sale of marketable securities Acquisitions, net of cash acquired Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common stock Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes Prepayment of forward stock repurchase transaction Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation (1) Payment of deferred acquisition-related consideration Payment of debt issuance costs Payment of deferred public offering costs Repurchases of outstanding common stock Net cash provided by financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ (182,873) $ (419,003) $ 36,131 41,478 51,255 — (2,527) 7,315 5,345 — 4,094 52,278 16,641 9,303 (44,411) 5,249 (36,853) (24,061) (52,318) 21,659 11,623 — (43,097) 9,751 (12,118) 175,000 (78,000) — (75) (5,964) — — 88,594 1,746 10,390 192,114 41,640 69,527 (3,463) 38,568 17,601 — 7,088 7,574 (18,816) 21,040 (14,618) 142,941 2,168 28,981 80,680 (29,348) (11,468) — — — 5,427 38,313 (35,005) (23,281) 68,461 (1,280) (107,753) 157,611 (43,627) — 119,918 47,348 (104,353) 19,286 9,664 (6,889) — — 3,463 (950) (3,333) — — 1,955 (1,046) (87,558) 279,672 (51,245) (220,055) 94,680 30,048 (65,405) (211,977) 36,775 (13,942) — — 29,348 — — (903) (35,613) 15,665 (1,556) (40,257) 319,929 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 202,504 $ 192,114 $ 279,672 66 Supplementary cash flow disclosure: Cash paid for interest Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes, net Non-cash investing and financing activities: Purchases of property and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ $ $ 3,114 8,370 $ $ — $ — 9,690 $ (1,093) 5,785 $ 2,258 $ 5,153 (1) Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted an accounting standard which addresses, among other items, updates to the presentation and treatment of excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation. See Recent Accounting Standards in Note 1 below. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 67 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Summary of business and significant accounting policies GoPro is enabling the way people capture and share their lives from a perspective only achieved with a GoPro. What began as an idea to help athletes document themselves engaged in sport, GoPro has become a mobile storytelling solution that helps the world share itself through immersive content. To date, our cameras and mountable and wearable accessories have generated substantially all of our revenue. We sell our products globally through retailers, wholesale distributors, and on our website. The Company’s global corporate headquarters are located in San Mateo, California. Basis of presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31, and its fiscal quarters end on March 31, June 30 and September 30. Principles of consolidation. These consolidated financial statements include all the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include those related to revenue recognition (including sales returns, implied post contract support, price protection and other sales incentives), stock-based compensation, inventory valuation, product warranty liabilities, the valuation and useful lives of long-lived assets (property and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill) and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ materially from management’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations could be affected. Comprehensive income (loss). For all periods presented, comprehensive income (loss) approximated net income (loss). Therefore, the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) have been omitted. Prior period reclassifications. Reclassifications of certain prior period amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been made to conform to the current period presentation. Cash equivalents and marketable securities. Cash equivalents primarily consist of investments in money market funds with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. Marketable securities consist of commercial paper, U.S. agency securities, and corporate debt securities, and are classified as available-for-sale securities. The Company views these securities as available to support current operations and it has classified all available-for-sale securities as current assets. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, if any, included in stockholders’ equity. Unrealized losses are charged against other income (expense), net, for declines in fair value below the cost of an individual investment that is deemed to be other than temporary. The Company has not identified any marketable securities as other-than-temporarily impaired for the periods presented. The cost of securities sold is based upon a specific identification method. Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are stated at invoice value less estimated allowances for returns and doubtful accounts. Allowances are recorded based on the Company’s assessment of various factors, such as: historical experience, credit quality of its customers, age of the accounts receivable balances, geographic related risks, economic conditions and other factors that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. The allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Inventory. Inventory consists of finished goods and component parts, which are purchased directly from suppliers or from contract manufacturers. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value on a first- in, first-out basis. The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or excess inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated market value. The Company’s assessment of market value is based upon assumptions around market conditions and estimated future demand for its products 68 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements within a specified time horizon, generally 12 months. Adjustments to reduce inventory to net realizable value are recognized in cost of revenue. Point of purchase (POP) displays. The Company provides retailers with POP displays, generally free of charge, in order to facilitate the marketing of the Company’s products within retail stores. The POP displays contain a display that broadcasts video images taken by GoPro cameras with product placement available for cameras and accessories. POP display costs, less any fees charged, are capitalized as long-term assets and charged to sales and marketing expense over the expected period of benefit, which generally ranges from 24 to 36 months. Cash outflows and amortization related to POP displays are classified as operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Amortization was $19.2 million, $19.6 million and $16.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Property and equipment, net. Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, ranging from one to eleven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or their expected useful life. Property and equipment pending installation, configuration or qualification are classified as construction in progress. Costs of maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the reporting date. The Company estimates and categorizes the fair value of its financial assets by applying the following hierarchy: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to directly access. Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; valuations for interest-bearing securities based on non-daily quoted prices in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value of Level 2 financial instruments is obtained from an independent pricing service, which may use quoted market prices for identical or comparable instruments or model driven valuations using observable market data or inputs corroborated by observable market data. Leases. The Company leases its office space and facilities under cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases. For leases that contain rent escalation or rent concession provisions, the Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease inception. The Company also calculates a liability for costs that will continue to be incurred under a lease for its remaining term without economic benefit to the Company upon determination of a cease-use date. The fair value of the liability is determined based on remaining lease payments, estimated sublease income and the effects of any prepaid or deferred items recognized under the lease. Goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Acquired intangible assets other than goodwill are amortized over their useful lives unless the lives are determined to be indefinite. For intangible assets acquired in a business combination, the estimated fair values of the assets received are used to establish their recorded values. Valuation approaches consistent with the market approach, income approach and/or cost approach are used to measure fair value. Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets. The Company performs an annual assessment of its goodwill during the fourth quarter of each calendar year or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry demand, that would indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of its single reporting unit is less than its carrying value. There was no 69 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements impairment of goodwill recorded for any periods presented. For annual impairment testing in 2017, the Company performed a quantitative analysis and determined the fair value of its single reporting unit exceeded the carrying value. Other indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed for impairment at least annually. If their carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, the difference is recorded as an impairment. See Note 4 for information regarding impairment charges recorded for indefinite-lived intangible assets. Long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. There was no material impairment of long-lived assets for any periods presented. Warranty. The Company records a liability for estimated product warranty costs at the time product revenue is recognized. The Company’s standard warranty obligation to its end-users generally provides a 12-month warranty coverage on all of its products except in the European Union where the Company provides a 2-year warranty. An extended warranty is also available for a fee. The Company’s estimate of costs to service its warranty obligations is based on its historical experience of repair and replacement of the associated products and expectations of future conditions. The warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates and the related use of materials, labor costs and freight incurred in correcting any product failure. Revenue recognition. Revenue is primarily comprised of product revenue, net of returns and sales incentives. The Company derives substantially all of its revenue from the sale of cameras, drones, mounts and accessories and the related implied post contract support (PCS). The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. For most of the Company’s revenue, these criteria are met at the time the product is shipped. For customers who purchase products directly from the Company’s website, revenue is deferred until delivery to the customer’s address because the Company retains a portion of the risk of loss on these sales during transit. The Company's standard terms and conditions of sale for non-web based sales do not allow for product returns other than under warranty. However, the Company grants limited rights to return product for certain large retailers and distributors. Estimates of expected future product returns are recognized at the time of sale based on analyses of historical return trends by customer class. Upon recognition, the Company reduces revenue and cost of sales for the estimated returns. Return trends are influenced by product life cycles, new product introductions, market acceptance of products, product sell-through, the type of customer, seasonality and other factors. Return rates may fluctuate over time, but are sufficiently predictable to allow the Company to estimate expected future product returns. The Company’s camera sales are multiple element arrangements that generally include the following three separate units of accounting: a) a hardware component (camera, drone and/or accessories) and the embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the hardware component delivered at the time of sale, b) the implicit right to the Company's downloadable free apps and software solutions (GoPro and Quik apps), and c) the implied right for the customer to receive PCS. PCS includes the right to receive, on a when and if available basis, future unspecified firmware upgrades and features as well as bug fixes, and email and telephone support. The Company accounts for each element separately and allocates revenue based on its best estimate of the selling price (BESP). The Company’s process for determining BESP considers multiple factors that may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable, including: the level of support provided to customers, estimated costs to provide the Company’s support, the amount of time and cost that is allocated to the Company’s efforts to develop the undelivered elements, and market trends in the pricing for similar offerings. Revenue allocated to the delivered hardware, related essential software and free software is recognized at the time of sale provided the conditions for recognition of revenue have been met. Revenue allocated to PCS is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the support period, which is estimated 70 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to be 15 months based on historical experience. Deferred revenue also includes amounts related to the Company’s GoPro Care and GoPro Plus fee-based service offerings. Sales incentives. The Company offers sales incentives through various programs, including cooperative advertising, marketing development funds and other incentives. Sales incentives are recorded as a reduction to revenue in the period the incentives are offered to the Company’s customers or the related revenue is recognized, whichever is later. In addition, the Company offers price protection discounts to certain customers, which are recorded as a reduction of revenue at the date of sale. Shipping costs. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are classified as revenue and the Company’s related shipping and handling costs incurred are classified as cost of revenue. Sales taxes. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to respective governmental authorities are recorded as liabilities and are not included in revenue. Advertising costs. Advertising costs consist of costs associated with print, television and e-commerce media advertisements and are expensed as incurred. The Company incurs promotional expenses resulting from payments under event, resort and athlete sponsorship contracts. These sponsorship arrangements are considered to be executory contracts and, as such, the costs are expensed as performance under the contract is received. The costs associated with preparation of sponsorship activities, including the supply of GoPro products, media team support, and activation fees are expensed as incurred. Prepayments made under sponsorship agreements are included in prepaid expenses or other long-term assets depending on the period to which the prepayment applies. Advertising costs were $61.3 million, $106.0 million and $64.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Stock-based compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with accounting guidance that requires all stock-based awards granted to employees and directors to be measured at fair value and recognized as an expense. The Company primarily issues restricted stock units and accounts for forfeitures as they occur. For service-based awards, stock-based compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For performance and market-based awards which also require a service period, the Company uses graded vesting over the longer of the derived service period or when the performance or market condition is satisfied. Foreign currency. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The Company remeasures monetary assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar using exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date, and non-monetary assets and liabilities at historical rates. Foreign currency remeasurement and transaction gains and losses are included in other income (expense), net and have not been material for any periods presented. Income taxes. The Company utilizes the asset and liability method for computing its income tax provision, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. Management makes estimates, assumptions and judgments to determine the Company’s provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation losses recorded against deferred tax assets. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent the Company believes recovery is not likely, establishes a valuation allowance. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recognized within income tax expense. On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). Further information on the tax impacts of the TCJA is included in Note 9 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Segment information. The Company operates as one operating segment as it only reports financial information on an aggregate and consolidated basis to its CEO, who is the Company’s chief operating decision maker. 71 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Date of adoption Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters Recent accounting standards Standard Description Standards that were adopted Stock Compensation Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09 (Topic 718) This standard simplifies certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income taxes, classification of awards and classification on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also allows an entity to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. Standards not yet adopted Revenue from Contracts with Customers ASU No. 2014-09, 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10 and 2016-12 (Topic 606) The updated revenue standard establishes principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for all industries. Under the new model, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard requires that entities disclose the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Early adoption is permitted, but not earlier than the first quarter of 2017. The retrospective or cumulative effect transition method is permitted. January 1, 2017 January 1, 2018 Leases ASU No. 2016-02(Topic 842) January 1, 2019 This standard requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize the expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to current practice. Lessees would recognize a right-to-use asset and lease liability for all leases with terms of more than 12 months. The new standard should be applied on a modified retrospective basis. 72 Adoption of the standard resulted in the recognition of previously unrecognized excess tax benefits using the modified retrospective method. The Company recorded an increase to U.S. deferred tax assets of $179 million which was recorded directly against the accumulated deficit. The increased deferred tax asset allowed for an offset against long-term income tax payable of $16 million. A full valuation allowance was provided on the remaining U.S. deferred tax asset of $163 million, which was also recorded against the accumulated deficit. The net impact to equity was a decrease in the accumulated deficit of approximately $16 million. The Company elected to apply the change in presentation to the statements of cash flows prospectively and elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company completed an analysis of the impact of the standard on its sales contract portfolio by reviewing its current accounting policies and practices to identify differences that would result from applying the requirements of the new standard to its sales contracts. The Company’s analysis of its contracts under the new standard supports the recognition of its product revenue at the time product is shipped, consistent with its current revenue policy. As a result of the adoption of the new guidance, certain sales incentives will need to be estimated as variable consideration at the time product is shipped and included as a reduction to the transaction price. This will result in a reduction of revenue being recorded earlier than under the existing guidance. Additionally, for customers who purchase products directly from the Company's website, the new standard provides for a policy election whereby the Company will record revenue when the related product is shipped. This will result in recognition of revenue earlier than under existing guidance, under which the Company recognizes revenue upon delivery to the customer. The Company expects the net impact of ASU 2014-09 to be less than $5 million as a reduction to retained earnings. The Company will adopt the standard on a modified retrospective basis. Although the Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, the Company currently expects that most of its operating lease commitments will be subject to the new standard and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption. GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Income Taxes ASU No. 2016-16 (Topic 740) Intangible - Goodwill and Other ASU No. 2017-04 (Topic 350) Stock Compensation ASU No. 2017-09 (Topic 718) This standard requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of intra-entity asset transfers when they occur. This removes the exception to postpone recognition until the asset has been sold to an outside party. The updated standard is effective in annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted during the first interim period of a fiscal year. This standard simplifies the accounting for goodwill and removes Step 2 of the annual goodwill impairment test. Upon adoption, goodwill impairment will be determined based on the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. Early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017, and requires a prospective transition method. This standard clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under this standard, modification is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of an award as equity or liability changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. The updated standard is effective in annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. January 1, 2018 The Company intends to apply the modified retrospective approach upon adoption. The Company expects that the adoption of ASU 2016-16 on January 1, 2018 will result in a $15 million cumulative-effect increase in accumulated deficit on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. January 1, 2020 The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. January 1, 2018 The Company does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material impact to its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will adopt the amendment on a prospective basis. Although there are several other new accounting standards issued or proposed by the FASB, which the Company has adopted or will adopt, as applicable, the Company does not believe any of these additional accounting pronouncements has had or will have a material impact on its financial statements. 2. Business Acquisitions In 2016, the Company completed acquisitions of two privately-held mobile editing application companies for total cash consideration of approximately $104 million. The aggregate allocation of the purchase prices primarily included $17.4 million of identifiable intangible assets, $3.4 million of net deferred tax liabilities and approximately $89 million of residual goodwill. Net tangible assets acquired were not material. In addition to the amounts above, aggregate deferred cash and stock compensation of up to approximately $35 million is payable to certain continuing employees subject to meeting specified future employment conditions. This amount is being recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service periods of up to four years from the respective acquisition dates, including approximately $22 million recognized in 2016. In 2015, the Company completed several acquisitions qualifying as business combinations for aggregate consideration of $70.2 million, the substantial majority of which was cash consideration. The aggregated allocation of the purchased prices primarily included $32.3 million of identifiable intangible assets, $4.7 million of net deferred tax liabilities and approximately $43.0 million of residual goodwill. Net liabilities assumed were not material. Goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies in the technologies that can be leveraged by the Company in future product offerings related to device and software related offerings. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for U.S. income tax purposes. The operating results of the acquired companies have been included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for 2016 and 2015 from the date of acquisition. 73 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Actual and pro forma results of operations for these acquisitions have not been presented because they did not have a material impact to the Company's consolidated results of operations, either individually or in aggregate. 3. Fair value measurements The Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy are summarized as follows: (in thousands) Cash equivalents (1): Money market funds Commercial paper Corporate debt securities Agency securities Total cash equivalents Marketable securities: U.S. treasury securities Commercial paper Corporate debt securities Municipal securities December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total $ 25,251 $ — $ 25,251 $ 18,024 $ — $ 18,024 $ $ 14,981 — — 2,500 4,999 14,981 2,500 4,999 — — — — — — — — — 40,232 $ 7,499 $ 47,731 $ 18,024 $ — $ 18,024 — $ 4,995 $ 4,995 $ — $ 8,283 $ 8,283 19,888 — — — 20,003 — 19,888 20,003 — — — — — 15,226 2,330 — 15,226 2,330 Total marketable securities $ 19,888 $ 24,998 $ 44,886 $ — $ 25,839 $ 25,839 (1) Included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Cash balances were $154.8 million and $174.1 million as of December 31, 2107 and 2016, respectively. There were no transfers of financial assets between levels for the periods presented. Cash equivalents and marketable securities are classified as Level 1 or Level 2 because the Company uses quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs to determine their fair value. The contractual maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were all less than one year in duration. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no financial assets or liabilities that were classified as Level 3, which are valued based on inputs supported by little or no market activity. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the amortized cost of the Company’s cash equivalents and marketable securities approximated their fair value and there were no material realized or unrealized gains or losses, either individually or in the aggregate. The Company’s liabilities that are disclosed but not measured at fair value include the Convertible Senior Notes (see Note 5, Financing Arrangements). The fair value measurement is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since it is based on quoted market prices of the Company’s instruments in markets that are not active. The Company estimated the fair value of the Notes by evaluating quoted market prices and calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume these obligations. The upfront cash payment used in the calculations of fair value on December 31, 2017, excluding any issuance costs, is the amount that a market participant would be willing to lend at December 31, 2017 to an entity with a credit rating similar to the Company and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows. The calculated fair value of the Notes, of $172.2 million, is highly correlated to the Company’s stock price and as a result, significant changes to stock price will have a significant impact on the calculated fair value of the Notes. For certain other financial assets and liabilities, including accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the carrying amounts approximate their fair value due to the relatively short maturity of these balances. 74 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 4. Consolidated financial statement details The following sections and tables provide details of selected balance sheet items. Inventory (in thousands) Components Finished goods Total inventory Property and equipment, net (in thousands) Leasehold improvements Production, engineering and other equipment Tooling Computers and software Furniture and office equipment Tradeshow equipment and other Construction in progress Gross property and equipment Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization Property and equipment, net December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ $ 18,995 $ 131,556 150,551 $ 25,236 141,956 167,192 Useful life (in years) December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 1–11 4 1–2 2 3 2–5 $ 67,713 $ 47,502 24,871 20,636 14,895 7,237 347 183,201 (114,614) $ 68,587 $ 48,103 46,328 23,742 18,750 12,530 7,578 1,870 158,901 (82,392) 76,509 Depreciation expense was $32.4 million in 2017 and 2016, and $24.8 million in 2015. In 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation charges in connection with its plans to vacate certain leased office facilities as disclosed in Note 11. Intangible assets (in thousands) Purchased technology In-process research and development (IPR&D) Total intangible assets (in thousands) Purchased technology IPR&D Total intangible assets Useful life (in months) 24–72 Useful life (in months) 24–72 December 31, 2017 Gross carrying value Accumulated amortization Net carrying value $ $ 49,901 $ (26,017) $ 615 — 50,516 $ (26,017) $ 23,884 615 24,499 December 31, 2016 Gross carrying value Accumulated amortization Net carrying value $ $ 47,001 $ (17,086) $ 3,615 — 50,616 $ (17,086) $ 29,915 3,615 33,530 In 2017, the Company did not record any impairment charges for IPR&D assets. In 2016, the Company recorded impairment charges of $6.3 million to research and development expense for abandoned IPR&D assets. As of December 31, 2017, technological feasibility has not been established for the remaining IPR&D assets, which have no alternative future use and, as such, continue to be accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets. 75 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Amortization expense was $9.0 million, $9.1 million and $4.2 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. At December 31, 2017, expected amortization expense of intangible assets with definite lives for future periods is as follows: (in thousands) Year ending December 31, 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Other long-term assets (in thousands) POP displays Long-term deferred tax assets Income tax receivable Deposits and other Other long-term assets Accrued liabilities (in thousands) Accrued payables (1) Employee related liabilities (1) Accrued sales incentives Warranty liability Customer deposits Income taxes payable Purchase order commitments Inventory received Other Accrued liabilities Total 9,263 8,753 4,998 870 — 23,884 $ $ December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ $ 16,451 $ 825 — 19,738 37,014 $ 27,592 106 33,425 17,206 78,329 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ 44,582 $ 24,945 89,549 9,934 8,700 1,247 6,162 14,470 13,441 91,655 42,577 40,070 11,456 4,381 2,756 4,730 3,950 9,748 $ 213,030 $ 211,323 (1) See Note 13 for amounts associated with restructuring liabilities. Product warranty The following table summarizes the warranty liability activity: (in thousands) Beginning balances Charged to cost of revenue Settlements of warranty claims Ending balances Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 11,945 $ 10,856 $ 20,139 (21,711) 19,272 (18,183) 10,373 $ 11,945 $ 6,405 25,377 (20,926) 10,856 76 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements At December 31, 2017, $9.9 million of the warranty liability was recorded as an element of accrued liabilities and $0.4 million was recorded as an element of other long-term liabilities. 5. Financing Arrangements Credit Facility In March 2016, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement) with certain banks which provides for a secured revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) under which the Company may borrow up to an aggregate of $250.0 million. The Company and its lenders may increase the total commitments under the Credit Facility to up to $300.0 million, subject to certain conditions. The Credit Facility will terminate and all outstanding borrowings become due and payable in March 2021. The amount that may be borrowed under the Credit Facility is determined at periodic intervals and is based upon the Company’s inventory and accounts receivable balances. Borrowed funds accrue interest, at the Company’s election, based on an annual rate of (a) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or (b) the administrative agent’s base rate, plus an applicable margin of between 1.50% and 2.00% for LIBOR rate loans, and between 0.50% and 1.00% for base rate loans. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Credit Facility of 0.25% or 0.375% per annum, based on the level of utilization of the Credit Facility. Amounts owed under the Credit Agreement and related credit documents are guaranteed by the Company and its material subsidiaries. The Company and its Cayman and Netherlands subsidiaries have also granted security interests in substantially all of their assets to collateralize this obligation. The Credit Agreement contains customary covenants, such as financial statement reporting requirements and limiting the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to pay dividends or incur debt, create liens and encumbrances, make investments, and redeem or repurchase stock. The Company is required to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio if and when the unborrowed availability under the Credit Facility is less than the greater of $25.0 million or 10.0% of the borrowing base at such time. The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, such as the failure to pay obligations when due, initiation of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, or defaults on certain other indebtedness. Upon an event of default, the lenders may, subject to customary cure rights, require the immediate payment of all amounts outstanding and foreclose on collateral. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company could borrow up to approximately $118.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively, under the Credit Facility, and was in compliance with all financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement. The Company has made no borrowings from the Credit Facility to date. Convertible Notes In April 2017, the Company issued $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2022 (Notes). The Notes are senior, unsecured obligations of GoPro and mature on April 15, 2022 (Maturity Date), unless earlier repurchased or converted into shares of Class A common stock under certain circumstances described below. The Notes are convertible into cash, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, or a combination thereof, at the Company’s election, at an initial conversion rate of 94.0071 shares of Class A common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $10.64 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment. The Company currently has the intent and ability to deliver cash up to the principal amount of the Notes then outstanding upon conversion. The Company will pay interest on the Notes semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The $175.0 million of proceeds received from the issuance of the Notes were allocated between long-term debt (the liability component) of $128.3 million and additional paid-in-capital (the equity component) of $46.7 million on the consolidated balance sheet. The fair value of the liability component was measured using rates determined for similar debt instruments without a conversion feature. The carrying amount of the equity component, representing the conversion option, was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the aggregate face value of the Notes. The liability component will be accreted up to the face value of the Notes of $175.0 million, which will result in additional non-cash interest expense being recognized in the consolidated statements of operations through the Notes’ Maturity Date. The effective interest rate on the Notes, including accretion of the notes to par and debt issuance cost amortization, was approximately 10.5%. The equity component will not be 77 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. The Company incurred approximately $5.7 million of issuance costs related to the issuance of the Notes, of which $4.2 million and $1.5 million were recorded to long-term debt and additional paid-in capital, respectively. The $4.2 million of issuance costs recorded as long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet are being amortized over the five-year contractual term of the Notes using the effective interest method. The Company may not redeem the Notes prior to the Maturity Date and no sinking fund is provided for the Notes. The Indenture includes customary terms and covenants, including certain events of default after which the Notes may be due and payable immediately. Holders have the option to convert the Notes in multiples of $1,000 principal amount at any time prior to January 15, 2022, but only in the following circumstances: • • during any calendar quarter beginning after the calendar quarter ending on September 30, 2017, if the last reported sale price of Class A common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during the last 30 consecutive trading days of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price of the Notes on each applicable trading day; during the five-business day period following any five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price for the Notes is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of Class A common stock and the conversion rate for the Notes on each such trading day; or • upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. At any time on or after January 15, 2022 until the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date of the Notes on April 22, 2022, a holder may convert its Notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount. Holders of the Notes who convert their Notes in connection with a make-whole fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture) are, under certain circumstances, entitled to an increase in the conversion rate. In addition, in the event of a fundamental change prior to the Maturity Date, holders will, subject to certain conditions, have the right, at their option, to require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of the Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding, the repurchase date. As of December 31, 2017, the outstanding principal on the Notes was $175.0 million, the unamortized debt discount was $41.4 million, the unamortized debt issuance cost was $3.6 million and the net carrying amount of the liability component was $130.0 million, which was recorded as long-term debt within the consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded interest expense of $4.4 million for contractual coupon interest, $0.6 million for amortization of debt issuance costs, and $5.3 million for amortization of the debt discount. In connection with the offering, the Company entered into a prepaid forward stock repurchase transaction (Prepaid Forward) with a financial institution (Forward Counterparty). Pursuant to the Prepaid Forward, the Company used approximately $78.0 million of the net proceeds from the offering of the Notes to fund the Prepaid Forward. The aggregate number of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock underlying the Prepaid Forward was approximately 9.2 million. The expiration date for the Prepaid Forward is April 15, 2022, although it may be settled earlier in whole or in part. Upon settlement of the Prepaid Forward, at expiration or upon any early settlement, the Forward Counterparty will deliver to the Company the number of shares of Class A common stock underlying the Prepaid Forward or the portion thereof being settled early. The shares purchased under the Prepaid Forward are treated as treasury stock on the consolidated balance sheet (and not outstanding for purposes of the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share), but will remain outstanding for corporate law purposes, including for purposes of any future stockholders’ votes, until the Forward Counterparty delivers the shares underlying the Prepaid Forward to the Company. The Company’s Prepaid Forward hedge transaction exposes the Company to credit risk to the extent that its counterparty may be unable to meet the terms of the transaction. The Company mitigates this risk by limiting its counterparty to a major financial institution. 78 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 6. Stockholders’ equity Common stock. The Company has two classes of authorized common stock: Class A common stock with 500 million shares authorized and Class B common stock with 150 million shares authorized. As of December 31, 2017, 101.0 million shares of Class A stock were issued and outstanding and 36.0 million shares of Class B stock were issued and outstanding. The rights of the holders of Class A and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting power and conversion rights. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time at the option of the stockholder into one share of Class A common stock and has no expiration date. The Class B common stock is also convertible into Class A common stock on the same basis upon any transfer, whether or not for value, except for “permitted transfers” as defined in the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation. Each share of Class B common stock will convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon the date when the outstanding shares of Class B common stock represent less than 10% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock then outstanding. As of December 31, 2017, the Class B stock continued to represent greater than 10% of the overall outstanding shares. The Company had the following shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of equity instruments as of December 31, 2017: (in thousands) Stock options outstanding Restricted stock units outstanding Common stock available for future grants Total common stock shares reserved for issuance December 31, 2017 9,809 9,483 23,071 42,363 Stock repurchase program. The stock repurchase program authorized by the Company’s board of directors in September 2015 to repurchase up to $300 million of the Company’s Class A common stock expired on September 30, 2016 and has not been renewed. The repurchase program did not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares. Under the program, the Company repurchased approximately 1.5 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $23.05 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $35.6 million. The Company holds the repurchased shares as treasury stock. CEO stock contributions. In the first half of 2015, the CEO contributed an aggregate 5.2 million common stock to the Company without consideration per the terms of a Contribution Agreement dated December 28, 2011, and amended on May 11, 2015. Under the original Contribution Agreement, the CEO agreed to contribute back to the Company from time-to-time the same number of shares of common stock as are issued to a certain Company employee upon the exercise of certain stock options held by such employee. Pursuant to this agreement, the CEO contributed back to the Company 0.5 million shares of Class B common stock from January 2015 through April 2015. In May 2015, the CEO contributed back to the Company 4.7 million shares of Class B common stock pursuant to the amended agreement, representing all of the then remaining shares subject to the contribution obligations. All of the shares contributed by the CEO were retired during the year. 7. Employee benefit plans Equity incentive plans. The Company has outstanding equity grants from its three stock-based employee compensation plans: the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (2014 Plan), the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (2010 Plan) and the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). No new options or awards have been granted under the 2010 Plan since June 2014. Outstanding options and awards under the 2010 Plan continue to be subject to the terms and conditions of the 2010 Plan. The 2014 Plan serves as the successor to the 2010 Plan and provides for the granting of incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards (RSAs), restricted stock units (RSUs), stock appreciation rights, stock bonus awards and performance awards to qualified employees, non-employee directors and 79 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements consultants. Options granted under the 2014 Plan generally expire within 10 years from the date of grant and generally vest over one to four years. RSUs granted under the 2014 Plan generally vest over two to four-years based upon continued service and are settled at vesting in shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the stock as of the first date or the ending date of each six month offering period. The 2014 Plan and the ESPP also provides for automatic annual increases in the number of shares reserved for future issuance. Employee retirement plan. The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan covering U.S. and other international full-time employees that provides for voluntary employee contributions from 1% to 100% of annual compensation, subject to a maximum limit allowed by Internal Revenue Service guidelines. The Company matches 100% of each employee’s contributions up to a maximum of 4% of the employee’s eligible compensation. The Company’s matching contributions to the plan were $5.5 million, $7.2 million and $5.5 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Stock options A summary of the Company’s stock option activity is as follows: Options outstanding Shares (in thousands) Weighted- average exercise price 12,379 $ 1,848 (1,329) (3,089) 9,809 9,786 8,154 $ $ $ 12.17 9.28 1.70 18.15 11.16 11.15 10.99 Weighted- average remaining contractual term (in years) Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands) 5.97 $ 32,772 6.00 6.00 5.45 $ $ $ 19,971 19,971 19,971 Outstanding at December 31, 2016 Granted Exercised Forfeited/Cancelled Outstanding at December 31, 2017 Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017 Exercisable at December 31, 2017 The weighted average grant date fair value of all options granted and assumed were $4.06, $4.84 and $18.40 per share in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The total fair value of all options vested was $19.5 million, $27.2 million and $26.9 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2017 represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the year in excess of the exercise price multiplied by the number of options outstanding. Restricted stock units A summary of the Company’s RSU activity is as follows: Non-vested shares at December 31, 2016 Granted Vested Forfeited Non-vested shares at December 31, 2017 80 Shares (in thousands) Weighted- average grant date fair value 7,970 $ 8,740 (3,862) (3,365) 9,483 $ 18.08 9.40 14.95 16.62 11.87 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The weighted average grant date fair value of all RSUs granted were $9.40, $12.10 and $44.00 per share in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The total fair value of all RSUs vested was $57.7 million, $49.5 million and $34.4 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In June 2014, the Company granted an award of 4.5 million RSUs covering shares of the Company’s Class B common stock to the Company’s CEO (CEO RSUs), which included 1.5 million RSUs that vested immediately upon grant and 3.0 million RSUs that were subject to both a market-based vesting condition and a three-year service-based vesting condition. The market-based condition was achieved in January 2015. Stock-based compensation expense related to the CEO RSUs was $0.6 million, $6.4 million and $29.4 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Employee stock purchase plan. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company issued 934,359, 668,107 and 436,924 shares under its ESPP at weighted average prices of $8.02, $9.15 and $26.88, respectively. Fair value disclosures. The fair value of stock options granted and purchases under the Company’s ESPP is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected term of stock options granted was estimated based on the simplified method. Expected stock price volatility was estimated by taking the average of our historic volatility and the historical volatility for industry peers based on daily price observations over a period equivalent to the expected term. Risk-free interest rate was based on the yields of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term. Dividend yield was zero as the Company does not have any history of, nor plans to make, dividend payments. The fair value of stock options granted was estimated as of the grant date using the following assumptions: Volatility Expected term (years) Risk-free interest rate Dividend yield Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 44%–49% 44%–45% 43%–54% 5.3–5.8 5.2–6.1 5.5–7.0 1.8%–2.1% 1.2%–2.0% 1.6%–2.0% —% —% —% The fair value of stock purchase rights granted under the ESPP was estimated using the following assumptions: Volatility Expected term (years) Risk-free interest rate Dividend yield Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 33%–36% 43%–54% 39%–45% 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7%–1.2% 0.4%–0.5% 0.1%–0.2% —% —% —% Stock-based compensation expense. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation included in the consolidated statements of operations: (in thousands) Cost of revenue Research and development Sales and marketing General and administrative Total stock-based compensation expense Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 1,935 $ 1,616 $ 24,963 10,498 13,859 31,365 13,883 22,663 51,255 $ 69,527 $ 1,492 18,024 13,762 47,402 80,680 81 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense was zero for 2017 and 2016, and $28.0 million for 2015. There is no tax benefit due to a full valuation allowance for 2017 and 2016 on the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax assets (see Note 9 below). At December 31, 2017, total unearned stock-based compensation of $97.3 million related to stock options, RSUs and ESPP shares is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years. 8. Net income (loss) per share On April 12, 2017, the Company issued $175.0 million of 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes. The Notes mature on April 15, 2022, unless earlier repurchased or converted into shares of Class A common stock under certain circumstances as described further in Note 5, Financing Arrangements, above. The Notes are convertible into cash, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, or a combination thereof, at the Company’s election. As the Company currently has the intent and ability to deliver cash up to the principal amount of the Notes subject to conversion, no shares associated with the Note conversion were included in the Company’s weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for any periods presented. While the Company has the intent and ability to settle any conversion in cash, the maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes is 20.6 million shares of Class A common stock. Additionally, the calculation of weighted-average shares outstanding as of December 31, 2017 excludes approximately 6.6 million shares effectively repurchased and held in treasury stock on the consolidated balance sheet as a result of the Prepaid Forward transactions entered into in connection with the Note offering. The rights of the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting and conversion. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time at the option of the stockholder into one share of Class A common stock and has no expiration date. Each share of Class B common stock will convert automatically into one share of Class A common stock upon the date when the outstanding shares of Class B common stock represent less than 10% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock then outstanding. Class A common stock is not convertible into Class B common stock. The computation of the diluted net income (loss) per share of Class A common stock assumes the conversion of Class B common stock. The following table presents the calculations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share: (in thousands, except per share data) 2017 2016 2015 Year ended December 31, Numerator: Net income (loss) Denominator: $ (182,873) $ (419,003) $ 36,131 Weighted-average common shares—basic for Class A and Class B common stock Effect of dilutive stock-based awards 138,056 139,425 — — 134,595 11,891 Weighted-average common shares—diluted for Class A and Class B common stock 138,056 139,425 146,486 Net income (loss) per share Basic Diluted $ $ (1.32) $ (1.32) $ (3.01) $ (3.01) $ 0.27 0.25 82 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following potentially dilutive shares were not included in the calculation of diluted shares outstanding as the effect would have been anti-dilutive: (in thousands) Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Effect of anti-dilutive stock-based awards 18,994 21,000 2,681 9. Income taxes Income (loss) before income taxes consisted of the following: (in thousands) Domestic Foreign Income tax expense consisted of the following: (in thousands) Current Federal State Foreign Total current Deferred Federal State Foreign Total deferred Income tax expense Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ $ (123,325) $ (200,595) $ (53,062) (174,579) (176,387) $ (375,174) $ 13,562 39,023 52,585 Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ (1,857) $ (2,925) $ 240 10,631 9,014 (248) — (2,280) (2,528) (356) 8,542 5,261 37,573 4,436 (3,441) 38,568 $ 6,486 $ 43,829 $ 18,548 3,007 6,539 28,094 (11,211) (204) (225) (11,640) 16,454 As of December 31, 2017, $4.5 million of earnings had been indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S., primarily in active non-U.S. business operations. We do not intend to repatriate these earnings to fund U.S. operations and, accordingly, we do not provide for U.S. state income and foreign withholding tax on these earnings. See also TCJA discussion below. 83 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (dollars in thousands) Reconciliation to statutory rate Tax at federal statutory rate Change in valuation allowance DTA rate change impact due to TCJA Impact of foreign operations Stock-based compensation State taxes, net of federal benefit Tax credits Other Income tax provision at effective tax rate $ Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ % $ % $ % $ (61,735) (35.0)% $ (131,311) (35.0)% $ 18,405 35.0% (38,016) (21.6) 101,878 74,943 34,039 12,001 (6,469) (9,957) 1,680 6,486 42.5 19.3 6.8 (3.7) (5.6) — 84,491 15,718 (14,195) (12,992) 1.0 3.7 % $ 240 43,829 27.2 — 22.5 4.2 (3.8) (3.5) 0.1 8,555 — 6,434 2,390 1,454 16.3 — 12.2 4.5 2.8 (21,891) (41.6) 1,107 11.7 % $ 16,454 2.1 31.3% The effective tax rate of 2017 resulted from a significant benefit on pre-tax book losses, offset by the valuation allowance on U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets and by income taxes paid at lower rates in profitable foreign jurisdictions (primarily wholly owned subsidiaries in Europe). In addition, due to the U.S. enactment of the TCJA, U.S. deferred tax assets were revalued by $74.9 million at the statutory rate of 21% which will be effective January 1, 2018, with a corresponding valuation allowance adjustment. In addition, AMT credits of $0.2 million become refundable under the TCJA and $0.2 million of valuation allowance was released. The effective tax rate of 2016 resulted from a significant benefit on pre-tax book losses, offset by the establishment of a valuation allowance on all U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets and by income taxes paid at lower rates in profitable foreign jurisdictions (primarily wholly owned subsidiaries in Europe). Overall, the provision for income taxes in each period has differed from the tax computed at U.S. federal statutory tax rates due to change in valuation allowance, the effect of non-U.S. operations, deductible and non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, states taxes, federal research and development tax credits, and other adjustments. The lower effective tax rates of 2016 compared to 2015 resulted from a significant benefit on pre-tax book losses, offset by the establishment of a valuation allowance on all U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets and by income taxes paid at lower rates in profitable foreign jurisdictions (primarily wholly owned subsidiaries in Europe). The provision for income taxes in each period has differed from the tax computed at U.S. federal statutory tax rates due to change in valuation allowance, the effect of non-U.S. operations, deductible and non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, states taxes, federal research and development tax credits, and other adjustments. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows: 84 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (in thousands) Deferred tax assets: Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 Net operating loss carryforwards $ 113,378 $ Tax credit carryforwards Stock-based compensation Allowance for returns Intangible assets Accruals and reserves Total deferred tax assets Valuation allowance Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance Deferred tax liabilities: Depreciation and amortization Intangible assets Total deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) 66,983 13,055 5,452 770 18,981 218,619 (217,884) 735 (292) — (292) $ 443 $ 30,193 22,341 26,656 6,336 — 26,587 112,113 (110,433) 1,680 (1,714) (2,540) (4,254) (2,574) Recognition of deferred tax assets is appropriate when realization of such assets is more likely than not. Based upon the weight of available evidence, the Company believes it is not more likely than not that the U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been established and maintained against U.S. deferred tax assets. The foreign deferred tax assets in each jurisdiction are minimal and are supported by taxable income or in the case of acquired companies, by the future reversal of deferred tax liabilities. It is more likely than not that the Company’s foreign deferred tax assets will be realized and thus, no valuation allowance is required on foreign deferred tax assets. The Company will continue to assess the realizability of the deferred tax assets in each of the applicable jurisdictions going forward. The Company’s valuation allowance increased by $107.5 million to $217.9 million as of December 31, 2017, primarily due to the impact of the ASU 2016-09 adoption that resulted in an increase in U.S. deferred tax assets of $163.0 million and current year movement on U.S. deferred tax assets of $36.9 million, offset by a decrease due to $17.5 million attributable to the debt discount on convertible debt, and a $74.9 million decrease due to the change in future tax rate under the enacted TCJA on December 22, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had established a valuation allowance of $110.4 million on all U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s federal, California and other state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were $456.1 million, $210.3 million and $233.7 million, net of reserves, respectively and federal and California state tax credit carryforwards were $39.6 million and $34.4 million, net of reserves, respectively. If not utilized, federal loss, federal credit and California loss carryforwards will begin to expire from 2030 to 2037, while other state loss carryforwards will begin to expire from 2019 to 2037. California tax credits may be carried forward indefinitely. Under the provisions of §382 of the Internal Revenue Code, a change of control may impose an annual limitation on the amount of the Company’s net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards that can be used to reduce future tax liabilities. Of the Company’s total $456.1 million federal net operating loss carryforwards, approximately $8.1 million was from one of our 2016 acquisitions. These acquired tax attributes are subject to an annual limitation of $1.7 million per year for federal purposes and will begin to expire in the year 2034, if not utilized. Uncertain income tax positions. The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $58.6 million, $56.9 million and $36.3 million, as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, total unrecognized income tax benefits in the amount of $19.8 million, $24.1 million and $31.0 million, respectively, if recognized, would reduce income tax expense after considering the impact of the change in valuation allowance in the U.S. A material portion of our gross unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would increase the Company’s net operating loss carryforward, which would be offset by a full valuation allowance based on present circumstances. 85 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to unresolved matters with taxing authorities regarding the Company’s transfer pricing positions and tax positions based on the Company’s interpretation of certain U.S. trial and appellate court decisions, which remain subject to appeal and therefore could be overturned in future periods. Management believes events that could occur in the next 12 months and cause a material change in unrecognized tax benefits include, but are not limited to, the completion of examinations by the U.S. or foreign taxing authorities and the expiration of statute of limitations on the Company’s tax returns. Although the completion, settlement and closure of any audits is uncertain, it is reasonably possible based on the receipt of the Joint Committee approval of the federal claimed income tax refund relating to the carryback of 2014 and 2015 net operating losses on December 18, 2017, and the IRS Closing Agreement received on January 24, 2018, that over the next twelve-month period, our unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2017, will decrease in the range of $15.0 million to $20.0 million, of which approximately $2.0 million to $3.0 million benefit would impact our effective tax rate. Such reduction is due to the resolution of certain issues, primarily related to transfer pricing and the R&D credit, raised in connection with our federal examination. Thus, we believe that that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease within the next 12 months. However, for all other jurisdictions, given the number of years remaining that are subject to examination, the range of the reasonably possible change cannot be estimated reliably. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the unrecognized income tax benefits are as follows: (in thousands) Gross balance at January 1 Gross increase related to current year tax positions Gross decrease related to tax rate change for current year tax positions Gross increase related to prior year tax positions Gross decrease related to prior year tax positions Gross decrease related to tax rate change for prior year tax positions Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ 56,909 $ 36,273 $ 20,002 20,594 (2,299) — (3,927) (12,101) — 130 (88) — 16,558 19,948 — 108 (341) — $ 58,584 $ 56,909 $ 36,273 Due to the U.S. enactment of the TCJA, U.S. unrecognized income tax benefits that reduce federal tax attributes are revalued at the statutory rate of 21%. Total gross decreases to unrecognized tax benefits were $14.4 million relating to the change in tax rates from 35% to 21%. The Company’s policy is to account for interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities within the provision for income taxes. The balances of accrued interest and penalties recorded in the balance sheets and provision were not material for any period presented. The Company files income tax returns in U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions. The Company is subject to federal, state and foreign income tax examinations for calendar tax years ending 2012 through 2016. The tax authorities could choose to audit the tax years beyond the statute of limitation period due to tax attribute carryforwards from prior years, making adjustments only to carryforward attributes. The Company has been under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2012 through 2015 tax years. IRS audit fieldwork has been completed and the claimed income tax refund of approximately $32.9 million relating to the carryback of 2014 and 2015 net operating losses was approved by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) on December 18, 2017. See also Note 14 Subsequent Events for additional information. U.S. Tax Reform. The Tax Cuts and Job Act (TCJA) of 2017, enacted on December 22, 2017, contains significant changes to U.S. tax law, including lowering the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21%, implementing a territorial tax system, and imposing a one-time tax on deemed repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The TCJA reduces the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. During the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a $74.9 million tax expense representing the detriment of remeasuring its U.S. deferred tax liabilities at the lower 21% statutory tax rate, as well as a corresponding full valuation allowance for the same amount resulting in no impact to our Statement of Operations. 86 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The TCJA also implements a territorial tax system. Under the territorial tax system, in general, the Company’s foreign earnings will no longer be subject to tax in the U.S. As part of transitioning to the territorial tax system the TCJA includes a mandatory deemed repatriation of all undistributed foreign earnings that are subject to a U.S. income tax. The Company estimates that the deemed repatriation will not result in any additional U.S. income tax. This preliminary estimate may be impacted by a number of additional considerations, including, but not limited to, the issuance of final regulations and the Company's ongoing analysis of the new law. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has approximately $4.5 million of undistributed earnings for certain non- U.S. subsidiaries that have been indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. These undistributed earnings do not result in a one-time deemed repatriation tax due to our overall accumulated foreign deficit, however these earnings could be subject to additional foreign and state income taxes if they are repatriated. The Company has historically asserted its intent to reinvest these earnings in foreign operations indefinitely and continues to do so. We do not intend to repatriate these earnings to fund U.S. operations and, accordingly, we do not provide for U.S. state income and foreign withholding tax on these earnings. While the TJCA provides for a territorial tax system, beginning in 2018, it includes two new U.S. tax base erosion provisions, the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) provisions and the base-erosion and anti-abuse tax (BEAT) provisions. The GILTI provisions require the Company to include in its U.S. income tax return foreign subsidiary earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary’s tangible assets. The Company does not expect that this GILTI income inclusion will result in significant U.S. tax beginning in 2018. The BEAT provisions in the TCJA eliminates the deduction of certain base-erosion payments made to related foreign corporations and impose a minimum tax if greater than regular tax. The Company does not expect that the BEAT provision will result in significant U.S. tax beginning in 2018. In addition, the Company intends to account for the GILTI taxes in the period in which it is incurred, and therefore has not provided any deferred tax impacts of GILTI in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA. The Company has recognized the provisional tax impacts related to deemed repatriated earnings and the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities to the extent needed and included these amounts in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions the Company may take as a result of the TCJA. The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018. 10. Related party transactions The Company incurs costs for Company-related chartered aircraft fees for the use of the CEO’s private plane. The Company recorded expense of $0.1 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had zero accounts payable associated with these aircraft fees. In 2013, the Company entered into a three-year agreement, which was amended in July 2016 to continue through the end of 2016, with a company affiliated with the son of one of the then members of the Company’s board of directors to acquire certain naming rights to a kart racing facility. As consideration for these naming rights, the Company paid $0.6 million over the three year period. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has recorded cumulative expense of $0.6 million, and has also provided 100 GoPro cameras at no cost each year. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had no accounts payable associated with this agreement. In 2016, the Company obtained services from a vendor whose CEO is also one of the members of the Company’s board of directors. The Company recorded expense of zero and $0.4 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. As of 87 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had accounts payable associated with this vendor of zero and $0.3 million, respectively. The Company has agreements for certain contract manufacturing and engineering services with a vendor affiliated with one of the Company’s investors. The Company made payments of zero to this vendor in 2017 and 2016 and $0.2 million in 2015. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no accounts payable associated with this vendor. See Note 6 and 7 above for information regarding CEO RSUs and Class B common stock contributed by the CEO back to the Company. 11. Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (in thousands) Operating leases (1) Sponsorship commitments (2) Other contractual commitments (3) Long-term debt (4) Total contractual cash obligations Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter $128,228 $22,177 $15,056 $18,244 $17,817 $ 16,693 $ 38,241 7,256 2,766 175,000 4,487 2,044 — 2,769 722 — — — — — — — — — 175,000 — — — $313,250 $28,708 $18,547 $18,244 $17,817 $191,693 $ 38,241 (1) The Company leases its facilities under long-term operating leases, which expire at various dates through 2027. (2) The Company enters into multi-year sponsorship agreements with event organizers, resorts and athletes as part of its marketing efforts. (3) The Company enters into other contractual commitments, including software licenses related to the Company’s financial and IT systems which require payments over several years. (4) The Company's convertible senior notes are due April 2022. Refer to Note 5 Financing Arrangements. In 2017 and 2016, the Company entered into sub-lease agreements for its office facilities that decreased the Company’s total future minimum lease payments by sub-lease rentals of approximately $4.3 million which approximates the corresponding remaining lease rentals. Rent expense was $19.1 million, $19.8 million and $12.2 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Due to inherent uncertainties of litigation, the Company cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters. The Company is unable at this time to determine whether the outcome of the litigation would have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company. Indemnifications. In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide for general indemnification. The Company’s exposure under these agreements is unknown because it involves claims that may be made against the Company in the future, but have not yet been made. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount under these indemnification agreements due to the Company’s limited history with indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has not paid any claims nor has it been required to defend any action related to its indemnification obligations. However, the Company may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations. 88 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 12. Concentrations of risk and geographic information Customer concentration. Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade receivables. The Company believes that credit risk for accounts receivable is mitigated by the Company’s credit evaluation process, relatively short collection terms and dispersion of its customer base. The Company generally does not require collateral and losses on trade receivables have historically been within management’s expectations. Customers who represented 10% or more of the Company’s net accounts receivable balance were as follows: Customer A Customer B Customer C Customer D December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 16% 32% 12% 11% 15% 27% * * The following table summarizes the Company’s accounts receivables sold, without recourse, and factoring fees paid: (in thousands) Accounts receivable sold Factoring fees Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ 178,300 $ 167,769 $ 194,223 1,630 1,266 1,566 Customers who represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenue were as follows: Customer A Customer B * Less than 10% of total revenue for the period indicated Year ended December 31, 2017 15% * 2016 17% 11% 2015 14% 12% Supplier concentration. The Company relies on third parties for the supply and manufacture of its products, some of which are sole-source suppliers. The Company believes that outsourcing manufacturing enables greater scale and flexibility. As demand and product lines change, the Company periodically evaluates the need and advisability of adding manufacturers to support its operations. In instances where a supply and manufacture agreement does not exist or suppliers fail to perform their obligations, the Company may be unable to find alternative suppliers or satisfactorily deliver its products to its customers on time, if at all. The Company also relies on third parties with whom it outsources supply chain activities related to inventory warehousing, order fulfillment, distribution and other direct sales logistics. Geographic information Revenue by geographic region, based on ship-to destinations, was as follows: (in thousands) Americas Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Asia and Pacific (APAC) Total revenue Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 591,879 $ 619,784 $ 334,872 252,990 366,352 199,345 868,772 535,260 215,939 1,179,741 $ 1,185,481 $ 1,619,971 89 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Revenue in the United States, which is included in the Americas geographic region, was $528.7 million, $554.9 million and $769.2 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. No other individual country exceeded 10% of total revenue for any period presented. The Company does not disclose revenue by product category as it does not track sales incentives and other revenue adjustments by product category to report such data. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, long-lived assets, which represent gross property and equipment, located outside the United States, primarily in Hong Kong and China, were $79.7 million and $76.6 million, respectively. 13. Restructuring charges Restructuring charges for each period were as follows: (in thousands) Cost of revenue Research and development Sales and marketing General and administrative Total restructuring charges First quarter 2017 restructuring Twelve months ended December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 $ $ 634 $ 10,092 7,047 2,519 20,292 $ 497 17,197 12,064 13,331 43,089 On March 15, 2017, the Company approved a restructuring plan to further reduce future operating expenses and further align resources around its long-term business strategy. The restructuring provided for a reduction of the Company's global workforce by approximately 270 positions, and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. Under the first quarter 2017 restructuring plan, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $17.0 million, including $10.3 million related to severance, and $6.7 million related to accelerated depreciation and other charges. The actions associated with the first quarter 2017 restructuring plan were substantially completed by the fourth quarter of 2017. While the Company anticipates that any additional charges related to this restructuring will be immaterial, actual results may differ from current estimates as it relates to the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. The following table provides a summary of the Company’s restructuring activities during 2017 and the related liabilities recorded in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. (in thousands) Severance Other Total Restructuring liability as of December 31, 2016 Restructuring charges Cash paid Non-cash reductions Restructuring liability as of December 31, 2017 Fourth quarter 2016 restructuring $ $ — $ — $ 10,312 (9,509) (803) 6,654 (151) (2,953) — $ 3,550 $ — 16,966 (9,660) (3,756) 3,550 On November 29, 2016, the Company approved a restructuring plan to reduce future operating expenses. The restructuring provided for a reduction of the Company’s global workforce of approximately 15%, the closure of the Company’s entertainment group to concentrate on its core business and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. Under the fourth quarter 2016 restructuring plan, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $40.7 million, including $3.2 million related to severance and facilities contract terminations during 2017. The actions associated with the fourth quarter 2016 restructuring plan were completed by March 31, 2017, with only small incremental charges recorded through December 31, 2017. 90 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table provides a summary of the Company’s restructuring activities during 2017 and the related liabilities recorded in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. (in thousands) Restructuring liability as of December 31, 2016 Restructuring charges Cash paid Non-cash reductions Restructuring liability as of December 31, 2017 First quarter 2016 restructuring Severance Other Total $ $ 9,660 $ 879 $ 2,134 (11,411) 17 400 $ 1,055 (1,884) — 50 $ 10,539 3,189 (13,295) 17 450 On January 12, 2016, the Company approved a restructuring plan that provided for a reduction in the Company’s global workforce of approximately 7%. Under the first quarter 2016 restructuring plan, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2016, which primarily included cash-based severance costs. The Company completed this plan at the end of the first quarter of 2016 and all costs have been paid. No charges were recorded in periods after March 31, 2016. 91 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 14. Subsequent events On January 2, 2018, the Company approved a restructuring plan to further reduce future operating expense and better align resources around its long-term business strategy. The restructuring provided for a reduction of the Company's global workforce of approximately 21%, the closure of the Company's aerial group and the consolidation of certain leased office facilities. The Company estimates that it will incur total aggregate charges of approximately $23 million to $33 million for the restructuring. The Company expects actions associated with the restructuring will be substantially completed in the first quarter of 2018. The Company has been under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2012 through 2015 tax years. The IRS audit fieldwork has been completed and the claimed income tax refund relating to the carryback of 2014 and 2015 net operating losses was approved by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) on December 18, 2017. The Closing Agreement was received on January 24, 2018. The Company received an income tax refund of approximately $32.9 million, net of IRS adjustments, in February 2018. The Company will also recognize an income tax benefit of approximately $2.0 million to $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2018. 92 GoPro, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Schedule II GoPro, Inc. VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 Balance at Beginning of Year Charges to Revenue Charges to Expense Charges to Other Accounts - Equity Deductions /Write-offs Balance at End of Year (in thousands) Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable: Year ended December 31, 2017 $ 1,281 $ — $ (263) $ — $ (268) $ Year ended December 31, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015 Allowance for sales returns: 1,400 1,250 — — 40 682 — — (159) (532) 750 1,281 1,400 Year ended December 31, 2017 $ 20,038 $ 55,274 $ (48,554) $ — $ — $ 26,758 Year ended December 31, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015 Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: 26,280 25,747 35,136 48,182 (41,378) (47,649) — — — — 20,038 26,280 Year ended December 31, 2017 $ 110,433 $ — $ (38,016) $ 145,467 $ — $ 217,884 Year ended December 31, 2016 Year ended December 31, 2015 8,555 — — — 101,878 8,555 — — — — 110,433 8,555 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2017, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. 93 Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on that assessment, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls Our management, including the CEO and CFO, recognizes that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting cannot prevent or detect all possible instances of errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. 94 Item 9B. Other Information None. PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance The information required for this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required for this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information required for this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence The information required for this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services The information required for this Item is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement to be filed for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 1. Financial Statements The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. 2. Financial Statement Schedules The financial statement schedule filed in response to Part II, Item 8 and Part IV, Item 15(c) of this Form 10-K is listed under Part II, Item 8 on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements. 3. Exhibit Listing Exhibit Number 3.01 3.02 4.01 Exhibit Title Form File No. Exhibit Filing Date Herewith Incorporated by Reference Filed Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant. Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant. Form of Registrant’s Class A common stock certificate. S-1 S-1 S-1 333-200038 333-200038 333-196083 3.01 3.02 4.01 November 10, 2014 November 10, 2014 May 19, 2014 95 4.02 10.01* Indenture, dated as of April 12, 2017, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (including the form of 3.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2022) Form of Indemnity Agreement by and between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers. 8-K 001-36514 4.1 April 12, 2017 S-1 333-196083 10.01 May 19, 2014 10.02* Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement. S-1 333-196083 10.09 May 19, 2014 S-1 333-196083 10.02 May 19, 2014 10-Q 001-36514 10.03 July 29, 2016 S-1/A 333-196083 10.04 June 11, 2014 S-1/A 333-196083 10.16 June 11, 2014 S-1 333-196083 10.08 May 19, 2014 8-K 001-36514 10.01 December 20, 2016 10-K 001-36514 10.12 February 16, 2017 10-K 001-36514 10.13 February 16, 2017 S-1 333-196083 10.12 May 19, 2014 10-K 001-36514 10.15 February 16, 2017 10-K 001-36514 10.16 February 16, 2017 10-Q 001-36514 10.17 May 6, 2016 8-K 001-36514 10.1 April 7, 2017 10-Q 001-36514 10.02 August 4, 2017 10.03* 10.04* 10.05* 10.06* 10.07* 10.08* 10.09* 10.10* 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17* 10.18* 10.19* 21.01 23.01 24.01 31.01 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and form of stock option agreement and restricted stock unit agreement. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, and forms thereunder. 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and forms thereunder. Employment Letter to Nicholas Woodman from the Registrant, dated June 2, 2014. Offer Letter to Sharon Zezima from the Registrant, dated August 23, 2013. Separation Agreement and Release of Claims dated December 15, 2016 by and between Anthony Bates and the Registrant. Offer Letter to Brian McGee from the Registrant, dated September 3, 2015. Offer Letter to Charles Prober from Registrant, dated May 28, 2014. Office Lease Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2011, by and between Locon San Mateo, LLC and the Registrant, as amended, and other leases for the Registrant’s headquarters. Eighth amendment to Office Lease Agreement, by and between RAR2 - Clearview Business Park Owner QRS, LLC and the Registrant, dated February 24, 2016. Ninth amendment to Office Lease Agreement, by and between RAR2 - Clearview Business Park Owner QRS, LLC and the Registrant, dated August 3, 2016. Credit Agreement by and among Registrant, the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. dated March 25, 2016. Forward Stock Purchase Transaction, dated April 6, 2017, between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association First Amendment, dated August 12, 2016, to Office Lease Agreement dated November 1, 2011, between the Company and RAR2-Clearview Business Park Owner, LLC Waiver Agreement dated January 1, 2018 by and between Nicholas Woodman and the Registrant. Terms of Separation Agreement dated January 4, 2018 by and between Charles Prober and the Registrant. Transition Incentive Agreement dated January 4, 2018 by and between Sharon Zezima and the Registrant. List of Subsidiaries. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Certification of Principal Executive Officer Required Under Rule 13(a)-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 96 X X X X X X X 31.02 32.01‡ Certification of Principal Financial Officer Required Under Rule 13(a)-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. 101.INS XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema 101.CAL 101.LAB 101.PRE 101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase X X Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan. As contemplated by SEC Release No. 33-8212, these exhibits are furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K * ‡ and are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not incorporated by reference in any filing of GoPro, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filings. Item 16. Form 10-K Summary None. 97 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Dated: February 16, 2018 Dated: February 16, 2018 GoPro, Inc. (Registrant) By: /s/ Nicholas Woodman Nicholas Woodman Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) By: /s/ Brian McGee Brian McGee Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Nicholas Woodman and Brian McGee, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, proxies and agents, each with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, proxies and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully for all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, proxies and agents, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 98 Name Title Date By: /s/ Nicholas Woodman Nicholas Woodman Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) February 16, 2018 By: /s/ Brian McGee Brian McGee Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) February 16, 2018 By: /s/ Anthony Bates Director February 16, 2018 Anthony Bates By: /s/ Kenneth Goldman Director February 16, 2018 Kenneth Goldman By: /s/ Peter Gotcher Director February 16, 2018 Peter Gotcher By: /s/ Alexander Lurie Director February 16, 2018 Alexander Lurie By: /s/ Susan Lyne Susan Lyne Director February 16, 2018 By: /s/ Frederic Welts Director February 16, 2018 Frederic Welts By: /s/ Lauren Zalaznick Director February 16, 2018 Lauren Zalaznick 99 [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] GoPro, Inc. 3000 Clearview Way San Mateo, CA 94402 (650) 332-7600 gopro.com Investor Relations investor.gopro.com 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above