More annual reports from GR Engineering Services Limited:
2023 ReportABN 12 121 542 738
AnnuAl report 2012
contents
ChAirmAN’s Letter
review of operAtioNs
DireCtors’ report
AuDitor’s iNDepeNDeNCe DeCLArAtioN
CoNsoLiDAteD stAtemeNt of CompreheNsive iNCome
CoNsoLiDAteD stAtemeNt of fiNANCiAL positioN
CoNsoLiDAteD stAtemeNt of CAsh fLows
CoNsoLiDAteD stAtemeNt of ChANges iN equity
Notes to the fiNANCiAL stAtemeNts
DireCtors’ DeCLArAtioN
iNDepeNDeNt AuDitor’s report
CorporAte goverNANCe stAtemeNt
ADDitioNAL AsX iNformAtioN
CorporAte DireCtory
1
4
9
23
24
25
26
27
28
58
59
61
71
73
cAlendAr
FINAL DIVIDEND:
eX-DiviDeND DAte
reCorD DAte
pAymeNt DAte
ANNuAL geNerAL meetiNg
11 septemBer, 2012
17 septemBer, 2012
28 septemBer, 2012
30 NovemBer, 2012
revenue for the year was $152.8
million, an increase of 7.2% over
the previous financial year. net
profit after tax for the year was
$13.1million.
chAirmAn’s letter
1
Dear Shareholder
As Chairman of GR Engineering Services Limited (GR Engineering or
Company), it is with pleasure that I present to you the Annual Report of the
Company for the year ended 30 June 2012, the Company’s first full year of
operation as a publically listed entity.
Despite what was in many ways a challenging year, a great deal was achieved by the Company during this period. Most
notably, the Company recorded a second consecutive year without one lost time injury. This is indeed an exemplary
result and I extend my congratulations to all those concerned. I urge management to maintain a constant focus on
occupational health and safety and to improve on an already excellent result.
Also during the year, the Company successfully delivered its largest project to date, being the design and construction of
the 750,000 tonne per annum Lead/Zinc processing plant for CBH Resources Limited’s Rasp Project. This facility, which
is located in New South Wales, was delivered on time and on budget and adds to GR Engineering’s excellent reputation
as a provider of engineering and construction services with guaranteed client outcomes.
In presenting to shareholders last year’s Annual Report, I commented on the Company’s strategic objective for organic
growth through geographical expansion. I am pleased to say that important foundations for this strategy has been laid
with the completion during the year of seven feasibility studies relating to overseas gold and base metal projects and
with good progress made on the establishment of a platform for the delivery of design and construction activities in
several West African jurisdictions.
Despite these positive outcomes, the year under review was in some respects difficult. Volatility in commodity prices
and difficult debt and equity markets contributed to the deferral of several projects. While the Company achieved record
turnover, these project deferrals resulted in less than optimum manpower utilisation and proportionately higher overhead
costs. In addition GR Engineering undertook works for a number of new clients on a range of greenfields and brownfields
projects. These projects were instrumental in demonstrating the Company’s capabilities and expertise and were
delivered on time and on budget, albeit at slightly lower margins than traditionally achieved.
Revenue for the year was $152.8 million, an increase of 7.2% over the previous financial year. Net profit after tax for the
year was $13.1million, a shortfall of $8.0million or 37.9% down on the previous financial year.
While these results were somewhat disappointing, the Company’s financial position remained strong. As at 30 June
2012, GR Engineering Services remained materially debt free, held cash of $38.9 million and enjoyed a strong working
capital position with a current asset to current liability ratio of 3.83 to 1.00.
Having regard to the Company’s profitability for the year and its strong Statement of Financial Position, the Directors have
resolved to declare a fully franked dividend of 4.0 cents per share, bringing the full year dividend payment to 8.0 cents per
share. The Record Date for this dividend is 17 September 2012 and the proposed Payment Date is 28 September 2012.
GR ENGINEERING SERVIcES LImItED ANNUAL REPORt 2012chAirmAn’s letter
As at 30 June 2012 GR Engineering was engaged on 18 feasibility studies, of
which 12 relate to projects in Australia. These studies, when combined with
those studies already completed provide the basis for a degree of optimism
surrounding new contract awards in the 2013 financial year. During the 2012
financial year, professional and professional support staff numbers increased
from 189 to 223, providing tangible support for this outlook.
In summary, the 2012 financial year was characterised by difficult operating
conditions brought about by project delays as a result of ongoing economic
uncertainty and weaker commodity prices. Nevertheless, the Company
was able to achieve record revenue and make strong inroads into accessing
international markets. Most importantly, GR Engineering was successful in
conducting a record level of construction activity while maintaining a strong
pipeline of project opportunities.
I would like to thank my fellow Board members for their counsel and
assistance throughout the year and extend my gratitude also to the men and
women comprising our highly valued workforce. Finally and on behalf of the
entire Company, I would also like to express my appreciation to our clients
for their business and support.
2
BARRy SyDNEy PAttERSON
Non-executive Chairman
a record level
of construction
activity while
maintaining a
strong pipeline
of project
opportunities.
Revenue
)
m
$
(
e
u
n
e
v
e
R
$180m
$150m
$120m
$90m
$60m
$30m
$0m
$152.8m
2H12
$142.5m
1H12
Fy11
Fy12
CONTINUED
3
Fy12 Revenue by commodity
5%
I
E
B
t
m
a
r
g
n
(
i
%
)
60%
35%
Precious metals
Base metals
Other
EBIt
$30m
$24m
)
m
$
(
t
B
E
I
$18m
$12m
$6m
$0m
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
$19.9%
$28.3m
$17.8m
2H12
$11.6%
1H12
Fy11
Fy12
GR ENGINEERING SERVIcES LImItED ANNUAL REPORt 2012
During the year ended 30 June 2012 the Company continued to capitalise on its excellent industry reputation and
delivered successful financial and operational outcomes to clients in the gold and base metals sector.
The Company also made good progress on the implementation of its stated strategy of growth through geographical
expansion, particularly into West Africa. During the year ended 30 June 2012 GR Engineering established subsidiaries in
Ghana, Cote D’Ivoire and Mali and was engaged on detailed design and engineering projects in Mali and Cote D’Ivoire.
In addition the Company is focused on several near term opportunities to deliver EPC and EPCM projects in West
Africa subsequent to the completion of feasibility studies on these projects, subject to clients obtaining finance and
environmental approvals.
GR Engineering aims to build on its operational presence in West Africa and is confident that these operations will make a
significant contribution to earnings during the 2012/2013 financial year and beyond.
4
In Australia, the Company delivered 7 projects on time and on budget. It is pleasing to report that 4 of these projects
were repeat engagements from existing clients.
All completed projects were profitable, continuing GR Engineering’s history of having no loss making contracts
Region
client & contract
commodity Description
Australia
• Integra Mining Ltd
Randalls Gold Plant
Upgrade
• CBH Resources Ltd
Rasp mine
Processing Plant
• Precious
metals
• GR Engineering was engaged by Integra mining
to undertake the upgrade to 1mtpa of the Randalls
gold processing plant in Western Australia
• Base
metals
• GR Engineering was engaged by cBH (toho Zinc)
to design and construct the 750Ktpa lead / zinc
processing plant for the Rasp mine at Broken Hill,
New South Wales
• Newcrest Mining Ltd
telfer Regrind Project
• Precious
metals
• Ramelius Resources Ltd
checker Processing Plant
• Precious
metals
• Newcrest Mining Ltd
telfer Gold mine Flotation
Upgrade
• Precious
metals
• Xstrata Nickel
cosmos Fuel Farm
• First Quantum
Minerals Ltd
Ravensthorpe Nickel Project
• Base
metals
• Base
metals
• GR Engineering was engaged by Newcrest
to undertake the installation of two ISA
mills, for a pyrite and copper circuit as a
brownfields expansion at the telfer Gold
Project in Western Australia
• GR Engineering was engaged by Ramelius to
provide EPc services to refurbish the 1.7mtpa
checker processing plant at mt magnet,
Western Australia
• GR Engineering was engaged by Newcrest to
provide EPc services for the installation of
vendor supplied Jameson cells as a brownfields
expansion at the telfer Gold Project in Western
Australia
• GR Engineering was engaged by Xstrata to provide
EPc services for the installation of a fuel farm at
the cosmos nickel mine in Western Australia
• GR Engineering was engaged by First Quantum
to provide EPc services for the installation
of a nickel concentrate bagging plant at the
Ravensthorpe nickel project in Western Australia
REVIEW OF OPERatIONSAmongst projects delivered during the year was the Rasp Mine lead/zinc
processing plant designed and constructed for CBH Resources Limited in New
South Wales. This was the single largest project delivered by GR Engineering to
date and further demonstrated the Company’s capacity to deliver large projects
on an EPC basis.
The year under review also saw the consolidation of the Company’s Brisbane
office as an independent profit centre. Showing steady growth, this office was
poised to make contributions to the Company’s profitability by the end of the
year through engagements secured on projects in Australia, Mexico and Laos.
Professional and support staff numbers continued to grow throughout the 2012
financial year reaching a plateau of approximately 225 by year end. Growth
in staff numbers has been integral to the Company’s strategy of growth
through securing larger projects and geographical expansion. This strategy
has been implemented through a period of international economic uncertainty
and a general weakening of commodity prices, particularly base metals. This
uncertainty resulted in delays and deferrals to projects which had been scheduled
to commence during the year. These project delays and deferrals contributed to
less than optimal utilisation of staff and therefore reduced margins. The Company
was nevertheless able to retain and keep actively engaged its valuable workforce
largely due to the historically high volume of study and design engagements.
5
Workforce comprising +220
professional and support staff plus
direct construction workforce and
subcontractors, up 20% from FY11.
GR ENGINEERING SERVIcES LImItED ANNUAL REPORt 2012During the year ended 30 June 2012, the Company completed over 30 studies
and consulting engagements and as at year end was engaged on 18 studies
relating to projects with a combined capital value exceeding $850 million. These
studies relate primarily to gold projects a number of which are located in West
Africa. The Company has strong expertise and a successful track record in the
design and construction of gold plants and it will capitalise on this reputation to
maintain maximum exposure to opportunities in the gold sector which remains
resilient in the face of a persistently strong gold price.
Securing and successfully completing study work and front end engagements
remains an integral and important component of the Company’s business
model as it seeks to develop an intimate knowledge of the related projects and
develop strong working relationships with their proponents.
6
During the year GR Engineering continued to maintain its strong occupational
health and safety record. Despite a record amount of construction activity,
the Company achieved a Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate of nil for the
second consecutive year. By 30 June 2012 the company had recorded 734
consecutive days without incurring a lost time injury. This excellent result
demonstrates the Company’s firm commitment to its most fundamental
corporate objective of protecting the health and safety of its most valuable
asset, its employees.
REVIEW OF OPERatIONSCONTINUEDGr engineering was successful
in conducting a record level
of construction activity while
maintaining a strong pipeline of
project opportunities.
7
GR ENGINEERING SERVIcES LImItED ANNUAL REPORt 2012reVieW oF operAtions
strategies For
continued Growth
• Capitalise on the Company’s strong balance sheet, excellent
reputation and track record and high calibre of its human
resources to win and execute larger construction and in
particular EPC construction projects.
8
• Continue the expansion into West Africa.
• Develop appropriate remuneration and incentive schemes
to attract and retain the highest calibre of professional and
skilled labour.
• Maintain the Company’s historical strategy of executing front
end studies and investigations and converting such studies
into construction projects.
• Assess opportunities to acquire other businesses to the
extent that they will be consistent with and complimentary to
the Company’s existing business model.
cONtINUEDdirectors’ report
Your Directors present their report together with the financial statements of GR Engineering Services Limited (“GR Engineering”
or “the Company”) for the financial year 1st July 2011 to 30th June 2012 and the independent auditor’s report thereon.
The names of the Company’s Directors in office during the financial year ended 30th June 2012 and until the date of this report
are as below. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.
DIRECTORS
Barry Sydney PATTERSON (Non-Executive Chairman)
Appointed 3 January 2007
Joseph Mario Paul RICCIARDO (Managing Director)
Appointed 4 September 2006
Tony Marco PATRIZI (Executive Director)
Appointed 4 September 2006
Terrence John STRAPP (Non-Executive Director)
Appointed 10 February 2011
Peter John HOOD (Non-Executive Director)
Appointed 10 February 2011
9
COMPANY SECRETARY
Giuseppe (Joe) TOTARO (B.Comm, CPA, FTIA)
Appointed 4 September 2006
Joe has been Company Secretary since 4 September 2006 and was appointed Chief Financial Officer on 19 April 2011. Joe
co-founded GR Engineering. Joe is a certified practicing accountant (CPA) with over 25 years’ experience in commercial and
public practice specialising in mining and mining services. Joe was formerly company secretary of and business consultant to
JR Engineering. Joe’s experience includes corporate advisory services having consulted on and managed numerous corporate
transactions involving private and publicly listed companies.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
During the year the Company’s activities have been the provision of high quality process engineering design and construction
services to the mining and mineral processing industry.
DIVIDENDS PAID DURING THE YEAR
• Fully franked dividend of 4.00 cents per share paid on 14 November 2011
• Fully franked dividend of 4.00 cents per share paid on 13 March 2012
• Subsequent to 30 June 2012, a fully franked dividend of 4.00 cents per share was recommended by the Directors to
be paid on 28 September 2012.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
directors’ report
10
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
During the year ended 30 June 2012 GR Engineering Services Limited (GR Engineering or the Company) achieved
record revenue largely from the delivery of 6 design and construction projects, including the 750,000 tonne per annum
lead/zinc processing plant for CBH Resources Limited’s Rasp Project, the Company largest project to date. This facility,
which is located in New South Wales, was delivered on time and on budget and its successful completion further
enhanced GR Engineering’s excellent reputation as a provider of engineering and construction services with guaranteed
client outcomes.
The 2012 financial year also brought with it a record level of study activity. GR Engineering successfully completed over
30 studies and consulting engagements in FY12 and is currently engaged on 18 studies, many for near term projects
both in Australia and overseas. The overseas studies provide tangible opportunities to achieve the Company’s stated
objective of growth through geographical expansion. The Company also made significant progress in FY12 with its
strategy to diversify into West Africa by establishing a corporate presence in Ghana, Mali and the Ivory Coast and
through the award of work in all of these jurisdictions.
As at 30 June 2012, the Company had a workforce comprising 223 professional and support staff in addition to a direct
construction workforce and subcontractors, up 20% from FY11.
Despite the record level of construction activity undertaken, GR Engineering’s focus on occupational health and safety
was rewarded with the achievement of a second consecutive year with a nil lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR).
GR Engineering will maintain its complete commitment to occupational health and safety and will strive to improve on its
already excellent record in this area.
Despite record revenue and good operational outcomes, the year under review was in some respects challenging.
Uncertain economic conditions abroad gave rise to a tightening of debt and equity markets. Combined with volatile
commodity prices, this economic uncertainty contributed to several project deferrals resulting in proportionately higher
overheads and less than optimum manpower utilisation, which also impacted on the Company’s margins. In addition, the
Company established relationships with new clients on a range of greenfields and brownfields projects. These projects
were successfully completed and delivered on time and on budget.
FINANCIAL POSITION
GR Engineering generated record revenue of $152.8 million and net operating cashflow of $16.2 million for the year
ended 30 June 2012.
During the year, the Company paid $12 million in fully franked dividends and held cash including term deposits of $38.9
million as at 30 June 2012, an increase of $2.9 million over the previous financial year, taking into account cash held to
secure contingent liabilities under the Company’s bonding facilities.
GROWTH STRATEGY
• GR Engineering’s focus remains on winning larger construction projects
- Strong balance sheet provides a platform to undertake work of increased scale
- Focus on quality revenue at acceptable margins will remain
• The Company aims to continue its expansion into West Africa
- Study activity in West Africa remains strong
- Build on early success in West African strategy through strong project execution and delivery
• GR Engineering will continue to focus on the conversion of studies into projects in line with historic strategy.
• Attracting and retaining the highest calibre of professionals and skilled labour in the market remains a priority
of the Company.
• The Company will continue to seek increased exposure to iron ore.
• Corporate / M&A opportunities will continue to be considered.
CONTINUEDSIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
Gold Ridge Mining Limited Arbitration
GR Engineering commenced debt recovery proceedings against Gold Ridge Mining Limited (GRmL) on 28 June 2011 to
recover outstanding costs and associated damages of around $4.5 million relating to a lump sum EPC contract for the
expansion and refurbishment of the Gold Ridge Mine in the Solomon Islands.
On 18 May 2012 GRML served GR Engineering with a further amended defence and counterclaim, including a new and
further counterclaim for gold losses arising from alleged defects and alleged representations regarding performance.
That value of GRML’s counterclaim is currently in the order of $45 million – over $42 million comprised of losses which
GR Engineering considers as having no basis, of an ambit nature and in any case are of a consequential and indirect
nature and therefore expressly and specifically excluded from the EPC contract between GR Engineering and GRML.
11
GR Engineering is aggressively protecting its reputation and excellent industry track record through a vigorous defence of
GRML’s counterclaim.
The Company’s insurers have been notified of the counterclaim. An arbitration hearing is scheduled for November 2012
in relation to the debt and the counterclaim. The Directors of the Company consider that GRML’s counter claim is an
ambit claim and that the Company will continue to vigorously defend its position. Accordingly, no provision has been
reflected in the financial statements in relation to the counter claim.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
Disclosure of information regarding likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity in future financial
years and the expected results of those operations is likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the consolidated entity.
Accordingly, this information has not been disclosed in this report.
EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE DATE
On 10 July 2012 GR Engineering Services Limited entered into an agreement with Assetinsure Pty Ltd by which
Assetinsure Pty Ltd agreed to provide the consolidated entity with a $10,000,000 performance bond facility. The
consolidated entity’s contingent obligations under the performance bond facility are secured by a Deed of Indemnity and
Guarantee, by which the consolidated entity agrees to indemnify Assetinsure against all and any loss arising from the
provision of bonds under the performance bond facility.
On 20 August 2012, the Company declared a fully franked dividend of 4.0 cents per share, an aggregate of $6,000,000.
The Record Date of the dividend is 17 September 2012 and the proposed payment date is 28 September 2012.
On 09 October 2012 the Company announced to the Australian Securities Exchange that it had reached agreement with
Gold Ridge Mining Limited (GRML) whereby in consideration for a cash payment of $2.65 million to GR Engineering, all
legal proceedings in relation to the Company’s claim on GRML and GRML’s counterclaim on GR Engineering would be
brought to an end. This settlement will result in the Company writing off $490,000 over and above the $1,525,000 already
provided for in the accounts.
There has been no other matter or circumstance other than that referred to in the financial statements or notes thereto,
that has arisen since the end of the financial year, that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect, the operations
of the Company, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Company in future financial years.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012directors’ report
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Barry Sydney PATTERSON – Non-Executive Chairman
ASMM, MIMM, FAICD
Barry is a Mining Engineer with over 50 years’ experience in the mining industry and is a co-founder of GR Engineering.
He co-founded contract mining companies Eltin, Australian Mine Management and National Mine Management. Barry
was also a co-founder of JR Engineering Services Pty Ltd.
Barry has served as a director of a number of public companies across a range of industries. He was formerly a non-
executive chairman of Sonic Healthcare Limited and Silex Systems Limited.
• Interests in Ordinary shares in GR Engineering Services Limited – 10,500,000
12
• Interests in Options in GR Engineering Services Limited – None
• Special Responsibilities:
- Chairman of the Remuneration and Nominations Committee
- Member of the Audit and Risk Committee
• Directorships in other listed entities in the last 3 years:
- Sonic Healthcare Limited (ASX:SHL) 1992 – 2010
- Silex Systems Limited (ASX:SLX) 1993 – 2010
Joseph (Joe) Mario Paul RICCIARDO – Managing Director
BAppSc (Mech Eng)
Joe co-founded GR Engineering. He is a Mechanical Engineer with over 33 years’ experience in feasibility studies,
design, construction, maintenance and operation of mineral processing facilities.
In 1986 Joe lead the founding of JR Engineering. As Managing Director, Joe successfully grew JR Engineering into a
leading engineering services provider before its sale to a major ASX listed Mining Services Group in 2001.
In 2006, Joe was instrumental in regrouping the former key executives from JR Engineering to establish GR Engineering.
Joe is a non-executive director of Mineral Resources Limited and has been on its Board since its public listing in 2006.
• Interests in Ordinary shares in GR Engineering Services Limited – 9,025,000
• Interests in Options in GR Engineering Services Limited – None
• Special Responsibilities:
- Managing Director
• Directorships in other listed entities in the last 3 years:
- Mineral Resources Limited (ASX:MIN) 2006 – Present
CONTINUEDTony Marco PATRIZI – Executive Director
BE(Mech Eng)
Tony co-founded GR Engineering. Tony is a Mechanical Engineer with over 20 years’ experience in the mining and
minerals processing industries as a company director, operations manager, project manager and maintenance engineer.
Tony was previously the operations manager of JR Engineering which had over 300 personnel and provided workshop,
maintenance, engineering and construction services to mining and mineral processing projects in Western Australia
and interstate.
• Interests in Ordinary shares in GR Engineering Services Limited – 9,025,000
• Interests in Options in GR Engineering Services Limited – None
• Directorships in other listed entities – None
Terrence (Terry) John STRAPP – Non-Executive Director
CPA, FFin., MAICD
Terry has extensive experience in banking, finance and corporate risk management and has over 30 years’ experience
in the mining and resource industry. He was formerly a non-executive director of The Mac Services Group Limited
(resigned 2010).
13
Terry is a non-executive director of Ausdrill Limited.
• Interests in Ordinary shares in GR Engineering Services Limited – 300,000
• Interests in Options in GR Engineering Services Limited – None
• Special Responsibilities:
- Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee
- Member of the Remuneration and Nominations Committee
• Directorships in other listed entities in the last 3 years:
- Ausdrill Limited (ASX:ASL) 2005 – Present
Peter John HOOD – Non-Executive Director
BE(Chem), MAusIMM, FlChemE, FAICD
Peter is a Chemical Engineer and has over 40 years’ experience in the resource and energy sectors.
He was formerly the chief executive officer of Coogee Chemicals and then oil and gas operator, Coogee Resources.
Prior to that he served in senior management and project development roles for WMC Ltd in nickel and gold production.
Peter has considerable board experience and is currently Chairman of Matrix Composites and Engineering Ltd, Deputy
President of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Immediate Past President of the Chamber of Commerce
and Industry of Western Australia and former Chairman of Apollo Gas Ltd.
• Interests in Ordinary shares in GR Engineering Services Limited – 500,000
• Interests in Options in GR Engineering Services Limited – None
• Special Responsibilities:
- Member of the Audit and Risk Committee
- Member of the Remuneration and Nominations Committee
• Directorships in other listed entities in the last 3 years:
- Apollo Gas Ltd 2009 – 2010
- Matrix Composites & Engineering Limited (ASX:MCE) 2011 – present
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012directors’ report
MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS
The number of Meetings of the Board of Directors held during the year ended 30 June 2012 and the number attended
by each director are as follows:
FULL MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS
Eligible
Attended
Barry Patterson
Joe Ricciardo
Tony Patrizi
Terrence Strapp
Peter Hood
14
13
13
13
13
13
12
13
13
13
13
Meetings of the Audit and Risk Committee were held on 22nd August 2011 and 20th February 2012. These meetings
were attended by the Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee Terrence Strapp, members of the Audit and Risk
Committee Barry Patterson and Peter Hood, and Chief Financial Officer Joe Totaro. No meeting of the Remuneration and
Nominations Committee was held during the year ended 30th June 2012.
OPTIONS
As at the date of this report, the unissued ordinary shares of GR Engineering Services Limited under option are
as follows:
Grant Date
19 April 2011
19 April 2011
19 April 2011
19 April 2011
Date of Expiry
Exercise Price
No. Under Option
19 April 2013
19 April 2014
19 April 2015
19 April 2016
$1.25
$1.50
$1.80
$2.10
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
The option holder does not have any right to participate in any issues of shares or other interests in the Company or any
other entity.
For full particulars of options issued to directors as remuneration, refer to the Remuneration Report.
No shares were issued during the financial year ended 30 June 2011 due to the exercise of options.
INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS OR AUDITORS
During the financial year, the Company paid insurance premiums relating to contracts insuring the directors and company
secretary against liability which may arise in connection with them acting as Director or Company Secretary, to the extent
permitted under the Corporations Act. The contract of insurance prohibits disclosure of the nature of the liability and the
amount of the premium.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
A summary of the arbitration proceedings between GR Engineering Services Limited and Gold Ridge Mining Limited has
been provided in this Directors’ Report under the heading Significant Change in the State of Affairs.
No person has applied for leave of court to bring any material proceedings on behalf of the Company during the year
ended 30 June 2012.
CONTINUEDNON AUDIT SERVICES
The Board of Directors is satisfied that the provision of non-audit services during the year is consistent with the general
standard of independence imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.
Non-audit services were reviewed by the Board to ensure they do not compromise the objectivity of the Auditor and to
ensure the nature of services provided is not inconsistent with the principals of auditor independence. Set out in
APES 110: Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants set by the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board.
During the year ended 30 June 2012 fees amounting to $25,860 were paid to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for non-audit
services including taxation advice. A further $2,667 was paid to Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Limited in connection
with the Company’s Initial Public Offering.
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
The Auditor’s Independence Declaration for the year ended 30 June 2012 has been reviewed and can be found at page 23
of the annual financial report.
15
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
In conducting its business, the Company is required to obtain permits and licences from relevant state environmental
protection authorities. It is of paramount importance to management and the Board of Directors that as well as operating
within its own Environmental Policies, the Company observes all relevant licences in good standing.
The Company has not been made aware of any areas of non-compliance in this regard.
The Company is not subject to the Energy Efficiency Opportunities Act 2006 as it does not meet the energy use
threshold specified in Section 10 of that legislation. The Company’s energy consumption will be monitored and will
register under the act if and when the energy use threshold is exceeded.
REMUNERATION REPORT – AUDITED
The report details the amount and nature of the remuneration for the Company’s key management personnel.
Directors
Joe Ricciardo
(Managing Director)
Tony Patrizi
(Executive Director)
Barry Patterson
(Non-Executive Chairman)
Terrence Strapp
(Non-Executive Director)
Peter Hood
(Non-Executive Director)
Executives
Geoffrey Jones
(Chief Operating Officer)
David Sala Tenna
(General Manager)
Giuseppe Totaro
(Chief Financial Officer & Company Secretary)
Rodney Schier
(Engineering Manager)
Peter Allen
(Manager - Process)
The named persons held their current position for the whole financial year and since the end of the financial year.
At the Company’s 2011 Annual General Meeting, 96% of eligible shareholders voted in favour of the remuneration
report. No specific comments were made regarding the remuneration report at the meeting.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012directors’ report
REMUNERATION POLICY
The Company’s remuneration policy has been designed to attract and retain high calibre key employees whose personal
interests are aligned with success and growth of the Company and therefore shareholders.
This will be achieved by:
• Staying abreast of labour market forces thereby ensuring remuneration offered by the company is competitive and
remains so through a process of annual review.
• Devising performance based remuneration programmes.
• Activation of the Company’s Employee Share Option Plan.
16
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
The Company’s policy is to remunerate non-executive directors according to market rates and to reflect the time
dedicated to their position and special responsibilities involved.
GR Engineering’s Constitution provides that the Directors shall be paid out of the funds of the Company by way of
remuneration for services as Directors such sums as may from time to time be determined by the Company in General
Meeting, to be divided among the Directors in such proportions as they shall from time to time agree or in default of
agreement, equally.
Directors are encouraged to hold shares in the Company to align their personal objectives with the growth and
profitability of the Company.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
Executive Director pay and reward is comprised of a competitive base salary. To the extent that both executive directors
are substantial shareholders in the Company, their personal objectives are aligned with the performance of the Company.
SENIOR EXECUTIVES
Executive remuneration is comprised of a competitive base salary and performance bonuses (at the discretion of the
board). The Chief Operating Officer is also incentivised through the issue of performance based options.
All executive remuneration packages are reviewed annually to ensure they remain competitive. Remuneration paid to
directors and executives is valued at cost to the Company. Options are valued using the Black Scholes method.
CONTINUED17
EMPLOYMENT DETAILS OF MEMBERS OF KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Name and title
contract Details
Incentives
Non
Salary
cash
Shares/
Units
Options/
Rights
Fixed
Salary
total
Joe Ricciardo
Managing Director
Tony Patrizi
Executive Director
Barry Patterson
Non-Executive
Chairman
Terry Strapp
Non-Executive
Director
Peter Hood
Non-Executive
Director
Geoffrey Jones
Chief Operating
Officer
David Sala Tenna
General Manager
Fixed term to 31 Jan 2013.
Termination: 3 months notice
by the Company or employee
Fixed term to 31 Jan 2013.
Termination: 3 months notice
by the Company or employee
By rotation and re election
By rotation and re election
By rotation and re election
Fixed term to 30 June 2016.
Termination: 4 months notice
by the Company and 3 months
notice by the employee
Fixed term to 31 Jan 2013.
Termination: 3 months notice
by the Company or employee
Joe Totaro
Company Secretary /
Chief Financial Officer
Fixed term to 31 Jan 2013.
Termination: 3 months notice
by the Company or employee
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
32.9%
67.1%
100%
-
-
100%
100%
100%
100%
The terms and conditions upon which key employees are employed are set out in contracts of employment. These contracts
provide for minimum notice periods prior to termination and, in some cases restrictive covenants upon termination.
The Company can terminate the contract at any time in the case of serious misconduct and termination payments may
be paid in lieu of notice period.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012directors’ report
REMUNERATION DETAILS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Short term
Benefits
Post Employment
Benefits
Share Based
Payments
cash
Salary &
Fees
$
Non cash
Payments
**
$
Sub total
$
Super-
annuation
$
Other*
$
Equity
$
Options
$
total
$
Perfor-
mance
Based
%
Executive Directors
Joe Ricciardo
18
2012
2011
311,926
11,855
323,781
242,854
10,440
253,294
28,073
21,857
tony Patrizi
2012
2011
311,926
223,800
15,482
13,350
327,408
237,150
28,073
21,492
Non-Executive Directors
Barry Patterson
2012
2011
87,199
32,532
terrence Strapp ***
2012
2011
60,000
23,000
Peter Hood
2012
2011
60,000
22,385
Total Directors
-
-
-
-
-
-
87,199
32,532
60,000
23,000
60,000
22,385
-
-
5,400
2,070
5,400
2,015
2012
2011
831,051
27,337
858,388
66,946
544,571
23,790
568,361
47,434
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
351,854
275,151
355,481
258,642
87,199
32,532
65,400
25,070
65,400
24,400
925,334
615,795
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
* “Other” amounts relate to performance based bonus payments, as approved by the board
** ”Non-Cash payments” refer to reportable fringe benefits (fuel for personal vehicles and novated leases)
*** Paid to SDG Nominees Pty Ltd, an entity controlled by Terrence Strapp
CONTINUEDEXECUTIVES
Short term
Benefits
Post Employment
Benefits
Share Based
Payments
Other*
$
Equity
$
Options
$
total
$
Perfor-
mance
Based
%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
cash
Salary &
Fees
$
Non cash
Payments
**
$
Sub total
$
Super-
annua-
tion
$
Senior Executives
Geoffrey Jones – chief Operating Officer
2012
2011
431,171
20,091
451,262
38,805
82,127
-
82,127
7,391
David Sala tenna – General manager
2012
2011
348,624
8,500
357,124
31,376
320,042
11,039
331,081
28,804
Giuseppe totaro – company Secretary & chief Financial Officer
2012
2011
211,009
177,664
7,737
5,887
218,746
18,990
183,551
15,990
Rodney Schier – Engineering manager
2012
2011
275,228
258,557
8,357
4,922
283,585
24,770
263,479
23,270
Peter Allen – manager – Process
2012
2011
388,673
267,388
3,836
3,800
392,509
34,980
73,394
271,188
24,064
50,000
Total Senior Executives
2012
1,654,705
48,521
1,703,226
148,921
73,394
2011
1,105,778
25,648
1,131,426
99,519
50,000
GRAND TOTAL
2012
2,485,756
75,858
2,561,614
215,867
73,394
2011
1,650,349
49,438
1,699,787
146,953
50,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
240,212
730,279
32.9%
19
50,622
140,140
36.1%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
388,500
359,885
237,736
199,541
308,355
286,749
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
500,883
14.6%
345,252
14.5%
240,212
2,165,753
14.5%
50,622
1,331,567
7.6%
240,212
3,091,087
10.1%
50,622
1,947,362
5.2%
* “Other” amounts refer to performance based bonus payments, as approved by the board.
** ”Non-Cash payments” refer to reportable fringe benefits (fuel for personal vehicles and novated leases)
The Company has established an employee share option plan. The Company may offer options to subscribe for shares in
the Company to eligible persons. Options offered under the employee share option plan are to be offered on such terms
as the board determines and the offer must set out specified information including the number of options, the period of
the offer, calculation of the exercise price and any exercise conditions.
The exercise price is to be determined by the Board in its absolute discretion and set out in the offer provided that the
exercise price is not less than the average market price on ASX on the five trading days prior to the day the Directors
resolve to grant the Option(s).
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012directors’ report
cONtINUED
EXECUTIVES (CONTINUED)
The Company has issued a total of 2,500,000 Options to its Chief Operating Officer, Geoff Jones subject to vesting
criteria and terms and conditions, namely that they will lapse if the employee ceases to become an eligible person, for
any reason other than a specified reason as outlined in the terms of the Option agreement. Key elements of the Options
are summarised in the following table:
20
Grant Date
Vesting Date
Date of Expiry
Exercise Price
Number
19 April 2011
19 April 2011
19 April 2011
19 April 2011
19 April 2012
19 April 2013
19 April 2013
19 April 2014
19 April 2014
19 April 2015
19 April 2015
19 April 2016
$1.25
$1.50
$1.80
$2.10
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
Fair Value at
Grant Date
$0.1740
$0.2450
$0.2400
$0.2600
The following grants of share-based payment compensation to directors and senior management relate to the current
financial year:
Name
Option series
Geoff Jones
Issued
19 April 2011
Number
granted
Number
vested
% of grant
vested
% of grant
forfeited
% of
compensation
for the year
consisting of
options
2,500,000
500,000
20%
0%
36.1%
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COMPANY PERFORMANCE AND REMUNERATION POLICY
The table below sets out summary information about the Company’s earnings and movements in shareholder wealth for
the 5 years to 30 June 2012:
Revenue ($000’s)
Net profit before tax ($000’s)
Net profit after tax ($000’s)
Share Price at year end
Dividend ($000’s)
EPS (cents)
Diluted EPS (cents)
2008
106,163
13,276
9,389
N/A
6,500
7.8
7.8
2009
79,074
22,111
15,471
N/A
11,000
12.9
12.9
2010
2011
2012
128,217
142,512
152,838
24,427
17,836
N/A
15,000
14.9
14.9
29,247
21,098
$1.95
19,000
16.76
16.75
19,858
13,115
$0.90
12,000
8.74
8.74
Note that for comparative purposes the number of shares assumed to be on issue for the financial years ended 30 June
2008 to 2009 inclusive is 120.0 million. This period is prior to a share split performed at the time the Company listed in
April 2011, which resulted in 120.0 million shares on issue.
The Company’s two executive directors, the Non-executive Chairman, two senior executives and four key employees
hold significant shareholdings in the Company. As a result the performance of the Company and the personal and
financial interest of its executive and management team are aligned.
The Company has issued a series of options to its Chief Operating Officer which are designed to deliver increasing
financial reward to the COO with increases in the Company’s share price and therefore shareholder wealth.
An Employee Share Option Plan has been adopted by the Company and will be implemented on an as required basis as
the Nomination and Remuneration Committee identifies the need to remunerate either existing or future employees, key
employees, executives or executive directors on a performance basis.
LONG TERM INCENTIVES
A new long term incentive plan, the GR Engineering Services Limited Equity Incentive Plan (Plan) was adopted by
the Board on 28 March 2012. In accordance with the Listing Rules of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX),
shareholder approval of the Plan will be sought at the Company’s next Annual General Meeting, to be held on 30
November 2012. Under the ASX Listing Rules, the grant of securities under the Plan to directors will be subject to
separate shareholder approval.
At the discretion of the Board, all eligible employees of the Company or eligible consultants may participate in the Plan.
Non-executive directors are not eligible to participate in the Plan.
The Plan is designed to align the interests of executives and employees with the interests of shareholders by providing
an opportunity to receive an equity interest in the Company and therefore direct participation in the benefits of future
Company performance over the medium to long term.
It is intended that the following awards will be made to eligible employees and eligible consultants under the Plan:
• Performance Rights (PR), with each PR being a right to acquire one fully paid ordinary share of the Company and
vesting upon the satisfaction of certain performance conditions; and
• Share Appreciation Rights (SARs), being rights to receive a future payment in shares, equal to the amount of
increase in market value of one share in the Company in a specified period between the grant of the SAR and
exercise of that SAR.
Securities issued under the Plan will be subject to vesting criteria as determined by the Board and have a term of 3 years
(or such term as otherwise agreed by the Board).
No securities were issued under the Plan in financial year 2012.
This marks the end of the remuneration report.
21
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012directors’ report
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Directors of the Company are committed to the highest standards of corporate governance in all elements of the
business of the Company including internal control, ethics, risk functions, policies and internal and external audit.
On 15 March 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors resolved to adopt comprehensive corporate governance policy
and manual based on ASX guidelines. It was further resolved by the Board that corporate governance policies would be
reviewed and additional structures implemented as the Company’s activities develop in size, nature and scope.
Please refer to the Corporate Governance Statement contained in this report.
This Report of the Directors, incorporating the Remuneration Report, is signed in accordance with a resolution of the
Board of Directors.
22
This directors’ report is signed in accordance with a resolution of directors made pursuant to s.298(2) of the
Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the Directors
JOSEPH MARIO PAUL RICCIARDO
Managing Director
Date: 24 August 2012
CONTINUEDAuditor’s independence
declArAtion
23
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012consolidAted stAtement
oF comprehensiVe income
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
REVENUE
Other income
Expenses
Employee benefits expense
Superannuation expense
24
Depreciation and amortisation expense
Workers compensation expense
Equity based payments
Finance costs
2012
$
consolidated
2011
$
152,837,930
142,511,568
2,150,714
1,395,900
(38,382,854)
(28,364,268)
(2,777,017)
(1,922,696)
(685,665)
(207,197)
(240,212)
(88,133)
(542,424)
(167,500)
(50,622)
(64,057)
Notes
5
6
6
6
6
Direct materials & subcontractor expenses
(86,542,699)
(77,896,150)
Accountancy & audit fees
Marketing
Doubtful debts
Occupancy
Administration
(256,888)
(168,478)
-
(1,921,977)
(3,859,463)
(63,588)
(118,557)
(1,525,000)
(1,211,631)
(2,733,487)
Profit before income tax expense
19,858,061
29,247,488
Income tax expense
profit after income tax expense for the year attributable to
the owners of gr engineering services Limited
7
19
(6,742,606)
(8,149,564)
13,115,455
21,097,924
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax
-
-
total comprehensive income for the year attributable to
the owners of gr engineering services Limited
13,115,455
21,097,924
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
The accompanying notes form part of these Financial Statements.
29
29
cents
8.74
8.74
cents
16.76
16.75
consolidAted stAtement
oF FinAnciAl position
AS At 30 JUNE 2012
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Income tax refund due
Other
Total Current Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred tax
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Borrowings
Income tax
Provisions
Unearned revenue / Advanced costs / Work in progress
Total current liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Borrowings
Provisions
Total Non-Current Liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS
EQUITY
Issued capital
Reserves
Retained profits
Total equity
The accompanying notes form part of these Financial Statements.
25
Notes
2012
$
consolidated
2011
$
8
9
10
7
11
12
7
13
14
7
15
16
14
15
17
18
19
33,861,242
33,279,221
25,378,835
27,270,864
578,464
-
231,305
1,673,918
1,202,524
203,460
60,049,846
63,629,987
2,191,887
1,832,680
4,024,567
1,972,639
3,222,304
5,194,943
64,074,413
68,824,930
10,258,673
14,760,280
246,701
694,564
3,872,639
6,101,140
526,904
-
6,486,824
5,586,777
21,173,717
27,360,785
232,335
478,500
710,835
21,884,552
42,189,861
401,581
228,370
629,951
27,990,736
40,834,194
28,501,548
28,501,548
290,834
13,397,479
42,189,861
50,622
12,282,024
40,834,194
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012consolidAted stAtement
oF cAsh FloWs
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Income tax paid
Interest received
Notes
2012
$
2011
$
157,194,026
132,609,565
(139,689,706)
(112,480,692)
(3,455,894)
(5,524,159)
2,191,766
955,789
Net cash flows from operating activities
8
16,240,192
15,560,503
26
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Investment in terms deposits
Net cash flows used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of shares
Payment of capital raising costs
Payment of finance lease liabilities
(Payments) / Proceeds from borrowings
Repayments of borrowings
Dividends paid
Net cash flows from/(used in) financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
(908,324)
(1,081,129)
-
-
(2,300,398)
(963,166)
(3,208,722)
(2,044,295)
-
-
30,000,000
(2,142,074)
(450,303)
(134,065)
853
-
411,217
-
(12,000,000)
(19,000,000)
(12,449,450)
9,135,078
582,020
22,651,286
33,279,222
10,627,936
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
8
33,861,242
33,279,222
The accompanying notes form part of these Financial Statements.
consolidAted stAtement
oF chAnGes in eQuitY
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
Balance as at 1 July 2010
Profit for the year
Other Comprehensive income for the year
Total Comprehensive income for the year
Declared dividend
Issue of capital
Capital raising costs
Deferred tax asset (Capital raising costs)
Share based payments
Balance as at 30 June 2011
Profit for the year
Other Comprehensive income for the year
Total Comprehensive income for the year
Declared dividend
Share based payments
Issued
capital
$
1,000
-
-
-
-
30,000,000
(2,142,074)
642,622
-
28,501,548
Reserves
$
Retained
Earnings
$
total
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
50,622
50,622
10,184,098
10,185,098
21,097,926
21,097,926
-
-
21,097,926
21,097,926
(19,000,000)
(19,000,000)
-
-
-
-
30,000,000
(2,142,074)
642,622
50,622
12,282,024
40,834,194
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13,115,455
13,115,455
-
-
13,115,455
13,115,455
(12,000,000)
(12,000,000)
240,212
-
240,212
27
Balance as at 30 June 2012
28,501,548
290,834
13,397,479
42,189,861
The accompanying notes form part of these Financial Statements
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
notes to the FinAnciAl
stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
The financial report of GR Engineering Services Limited for the year ended 30 June 2012 was authorised for issue in
accordance with a resolution of the directors on 24 August 2012.
GR Engineering Services Limited is a limited company incorporated and domiciled in Australia.
The registered office of GR Engineering Services Limited is located at 71-73 Daly Street, Belmont, Western Australia.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below. These policies
have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
28
New, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations adopted
The consolidated entity has adopted all of the new, revised or amending Accounting Standards and Interpretations
issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (‘AASB’) that are mandatory for the current reporting period.
Any new, revised or amending Accounting Standards or Interpretations that are not yet mandatory have not been
early adopted.
Any significant impact on the accounting policies of the consolidated entity from the adoption of these Accounting
Standards and Interpretations are disclosed in the relevant accounting policy. The adoption of these Accounting
Standards and Interpretations did not have any significant impact on the financial performance or position of the
consolidated entity.
The following Accounting Standards and Interpretations are most relevant to the consolidated entity:
AASB 2010-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Annual Improvements Project
AASB 2010-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures (December 2009)
AASB 2010-6 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards - Disclosures on Transfers of Financial Assets
Statement of compliance
These financial statements are general purpose financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and Interpretations, and comply with other requirements of the law.
The financial statements comprise the consolidated financial statements of the consolidated entity. For the purposes
of preparing the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated entity is a for-profit entity. Accounting Standards
include Australian Accounting Standards. Compliance with Australian Accounting Standards ensures that the financial
statements and notes of the consolidated entity comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’).
Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of historical cost, except for certain non-current
assets and financial instruments that are measured at revalued amounts or fair values, as explained in the accounting
policies below. Historical cost is generally based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets.
All amounts are presented in Australian dollars, unless otherwise noted.
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of the financial statements requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires
management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the consolidated entity’s accounting policies. The
areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to
the financial statements, are disclosed in note 3.
Accounting for Construction Contracts
Where the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, revenue and costs are recognised by reference
to the stage of completion of the contract activity at the reporting date, measured based on the proportion of contract
costs incurred for work performed to date relative to the estimated total contract costs, except where this would
not be representative of the stage of completion. Variations in contract work, claims and incentive payments are
included to the extent that they have been agreed with the customer. Where the outcome of a construction contract
cannot be estimated reliably, contract revenue is recognised to the extent of contract costs incurred that it is probable
will be recoverable.
Contract costs are recognised as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. Where construction contracts are
still in the completion stage, they are included as work in progress.
When it is probable that total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognised as an
expense immediately.
29
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of GR Engineering Services
Limited (‘company’ or ‘parent entity’) as at 30 June 2012 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended.
GR Engineering Services Limited and its subsidiaries together are referred to in these financial statements as the
‘consolidated entity’.
Subsidiaries are all those entities over which the consolidated entity has the power to govern the financial and operating
policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The effects of potential
exercisable voting rights are considered when assessing whether control exists. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated
from the date on which control is transferred to the consolidated entity. They are de-consolidated from the date that
control ceases.
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between entities in the consolidated entity
are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the
asset transferred. Accounting policies of subsidiaries and special purpose entities have been changed where necessary
to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the consolidated entity.
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. A change in ownership
interest, without the loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction, where the difference between the
consideration transferred and the book value of the share of the non-controlling interest acquired is recognised directly in
equity attributable to the parent.
Where the consolidated entity loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets including goodwill, liabilities and
non-controlling interest in the subsidiary together with any cumulative translation differences recognised in equity. The
consolidated entity recognises the fair value of the consideration received and the fair value of any investment retained
together with any gain or loss in profit or loss.
Operating segments
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating
decision maker. The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing
performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Managing Director of the consolidated entity.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
30
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Foreign currency translation
The financial report is presented in Australian dollars, which is GR Engineering Services Limited’s functional and
presentation currency. The functional currency of each of the subsidiaries of the consolidated entity is United
States dollars.
Foreign currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of
the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the
translation at financial year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
recognised in profit or loss.
Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the exchange rates at the
reporting date. The revenues and expenses of foreign operations are translated into Australian dollars using the average
exchange rates, which approximates the rate at the date of the transaction, for the period. All resulting foreign exchange
differences are recognised in the foreign currency reserve in equity.
The foreign currency reserve is recognised in profit or loss when the foreign operation or net investment is disposed of.
Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange
rates as at the date of the initial transaction.
Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date
when the fair value was determined.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the consolidated entity and
the revenue can be reliably measured.
Sales revenue
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the consolidated entity has transferred to the buyer the significant
risks and rewards of ownership of the goods.
Rendering of services
Revenue from a contract to provide services is recognised by reference to the stage of completion.
Where the contract outcome cannot be measured reliably, revenue is recognised only to the extent of the expenses
recognised that are recoverable.
Interest
Revenue is recognised as the interest accrues (using the effective interest method, which is the rate that exactly
discounts estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument) to the net carrying amount
of the financial asset.
Income tax
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported in the
statement of comprehensive income because of items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years
and items that are never taxable or deductible. The consolidated entity’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax
rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and their carrying amounts for the financial reporting purposes.
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences:
- except where the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a
transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting
profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
-
in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests
in joint ventures, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is
probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets
and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible
temporary differences, and the carry-forward of unused tax assets and unused tax losses can be utilised:
- except where the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary differences arises from the
initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the
transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
-
in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and
interests in joint ventures, deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the
temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the
temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it
is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to
be utilised.
31
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when
the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively
enacted at the reporting date.
Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in the statement of
comprehensive income.
Unearned income
Unearned income classified as a current liability consists of customer advances for construction work in progress. The
consolidated entity recognises a liability upon receipt of customer advances and subsequently as revenue when earned.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with financial institutions, other short-term, highly
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash
and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30-90 day terms, are recognised and carried at original invoice amount less an
allowance for any uncollectible amounts.
An estimate for doubtful debts is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Bad debts are written
off when identified.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion
and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
Property, plant and equipment
Plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. Historical cost includes
expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset as follows:
- Property, plant and equipment - over 2.5 to 20 years
The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Property, plant and equipment (Continued)
For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, the recoverable amount is determined for the
cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
If any such indication exists and where the carrying values exceed the estimated recoverable amount, the assets or cash-
generating units are written down to their recoverable amount.
The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In
assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
32
Impairment losses are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in the cost of sales line item.
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are
expected to arise from the continued used of the asset.
Any gain or loss arising on de-recognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds
and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the statement of comprehensive income in the period the item
is derecognised.
Leases
Finance leases, which transfer to the consolidated entity substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership
of the leased item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the
present value of the minimum lease payments.
Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a
constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly against income.
Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the asset are classified as
operating leases. Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating an operating lease are added to the carrying amount of the
leased asset and recognised over the lease term on the same bases as the lease income.
Operating lease payments are recognised as an expense in the statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line
basis over the lease term.
Impairment of non-financial assets
At each reporting date, the consolidated entity assesses whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired.
Where an indicator of impairment exists, the consolidated entity makes a formal estimate of recoverable amount. Where
the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount the asset is considered impaired and is written down to
its recoverable amount.
Recoverable amount is the greater of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. It is determined for an individual asset,
unless the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value less costs to sell and it does not generate
cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case, the recoverable
amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre tax discount
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
Trade and other payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the consolidated entity prior to the end of the
financial year and which are unpaid. Due to their short-term nature they are measured at amortised cost and are not
discounted. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
Borrowings
All loans and borrowings are initially recognised at cost, being the fair value of the consideration received net of issue
costs associated with the borrowing.
After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest method.
Gains and losses are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when the liabilities are derecognised and as
well as through the amortisation process.
33
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the consolidated entity has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of
a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the
obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
Where the consolidated entity expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed the reimbursement is recognised as a
separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented
in the statement of comprehensive income net of any reimbursement.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash
flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the
risks specific to the liability.
Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised as a finance cost.
Employee benefits
Wages and salaries, annual leave and sick leave
A liability is recognised for benefits accruing to employees in respect of wages and salaries, annual leave, long service
leave, and sick leave when it is probable that settlement will be required and they are capable of being measured reliably.
Liabilities recognised in respect of short-term employee benefits, are measured at their nominal values using the
remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement.
Liabilities recognised in respect of long term employee benefits are measured as the present value of the estimated
future cash outflows to be made by the consolidated entity in respect of services provided by employees up to
reporting date.
Contributions to defined contribution retirement benefit plans are recognised as an expense when employees have
rendered service entitling them to the contributions.
Share based payments
Share based payments to employees and others providing similar services are measured at the fair value of the equity
instruments at the grant date.
The fair value determined at the grant date of the share based payments is expensed on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period, based on the consolidated entity’s estimate of equity instruments that will eventually vest. At the end
of each reporting period, the consolidated entity revises its estimate of the number of equity instruments expected to
vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognised in profit or loss such that the cumulative
expense reflects the revised estimate, with a corresponding adjustment to the equity-settled employee benefits reserve.
Share based payment transactions with parties other than employees are measured at the fair value of the goods or
services received, except where that fair value cannot be estimated reliably, in which case they are measured at the fair
value of the equity instruments granted, measured at the date the entity obtains the goods or the counterparty renders
the service.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Issued capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are shown in
equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares
for the acquisition of a business are not included in the cost of the acquisition as part of the purchase consideration.
If the entity reacquires its own equity instruments, for example as the result of a share buy back, those instruments
are deducted from equity and the associated shares are cancelled. No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss and
the consideration paid including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes) is recognised directly
in equity.
34
Dividends
Dividends are recognised when declared during the financial year and no longer at the discretion of the
consolidated entity.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to the owners of GR Engineering Services
Limited, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during
the financial year.
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into account
the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the
weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to dilutive potential
ordinary shares.
De-recognition of financial instruments
The de-recognition of a financial instrument takes place when the consolidated entity no longer controls the contractual
rights that comprise the financial instrument, which is normally the case when the instrument is sold, or all the cash
flows attributable to the instrument are passed through to an independent third party
Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) and other similar taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of GST except where the GST incurred on a purchase
of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised as part of the
cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or
payables in the statement of financial position.
Cash flows are included in the Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising
from investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as
operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the
taxation authority.
New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet mandatory or early adopted
The following Australian Accounting Standards and Interpretations have recently been issued or amended but are not yet
effective and have not been adopted by the consolidated entity for the year ended 30 June 201
Standard/Interpretation
• AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ (December 2009), AASB
2009- 11 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
arising from AASB 9’
• AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ (December 2010) and AASB
2010-7 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
arising from AASB 9 (December 2010)’
*The IASB has amended IFRS 9 to defer the mandatory
effective date to annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2015. It is expected that the AASB will issue similar
amendments shortly
• AASB 10 ‘Consolidated Financial Statements’
• AASB 11 ‘Joint Arrangements’
• AASB 12 ‘Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities’
• AASB 127 ‘Separate Financial Statements’ (2011)
• AASB 128 ‘Investments in Associates and Joint
Ventures’ (2011)
• AASB 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ and AASB 2011-8
‘Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising
from AASB 13’
• AASB 119 ‘Employee Benefits’ (2011) and AASB 2011-10
‘Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising
from AASB 119 (2011)’
• AASB 2011-4 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel
Disclosure Requirements’
• AASB 2011-7 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint
Arrangements Standards’
• AASB 2011-9 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards – Presentation of Items of Other
Comprehensive Income’
• AASB 2012-2 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards – Disclosures – Offsetting Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (Amendments to AASB 7)’
• AASB 2012-3 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (Amendments to AASB 132)’
• AASB 2012-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards arising from Annual Improvements
2009–2011 Cycle
Effective for annual
reporting periods
beginning on or after
Expected to be
initially applied in the
financial year ending
35
1 January 2013*
1 January 2013
1 January 2013
1 January 2013
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
30 June 2014
30 June 2014
30 June 2014
30 June 2014
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
1 July 2013
30 June 2014
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
1 July 2012
30 June 2013
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
1 January 2014
30 June 2015
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
New Accounting Standards and Interpretations not yet mandatory or early adopte (Continued)
At the date of authorisation of the financial statements the following IASB Standards and IFRIC Interpretations were also
in issue but not yet effective, although Australian equivalent Standards and interpretations have not yet been issued and
have not been adopted by the consolidated entity for the year ended 30 June 2012:
Standard/Interpretation
36
• Mandatory Effective Date of IFRS 9 and Transition
Disclosures (Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7)
Effective for annual
reporting periods
beginning on or after
Expected to be
initially applied in the
financial year ending
1 January 2015
30 June 2016
• Consolidated Financial Statements, Joint Arrangements and
Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities: Transition Guidance
(Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12)
1 January 2013
30 June 2014
The impact of these recently issued or amended standards and interpretations have not been determined as yet by the
consolidated entity.
3. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS, ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its judgements
and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its
judgements, estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on other various factors, including expectations of
future events, management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The resulting accounting judgements
and estimates will seldom equal the related actual results. The judgements, estimates and assumptions that have a
significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial
year are discussed below.
Where the outcome of a construction contract can be estimated reliably, revenue and costs are recognised by reference
to the stage of completion of the contract activity at the reporting date, measured based on the proportion of contract
costs incurred for work performed to date relative to the estimated total contract costs, except where this would not
be representative of the stage of completion. Variations in contract work, claims and incentive payments are included
to the extent that they have been agreed with the customer. Where the outcome of a construction contract cannot be
estimated reliably, contract revenue is recognised to the extent of contract costs incurred that it is probable will
be recoverable.
Contract costs are recognised as expenses in the period in which they are incurred. Where construction contracts are
still in the completion stage, they are included as work in progress.
When it is probable that total contract costs will exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognised as an
expense immediately.
Because the consolidated entity predominantly undertakes projects on an Engineering, Procurement & Construction
(“EPC”) turnkey design and construction contract basis, all the risk associated with cost, time, plant performance and
plant warranty (defects period) rests with the consolidated entity. As such the consolidated entity is responsible for the
total “make-good” of any defects of underperformance.
The consolidated entity includes a project completion and close out provision (liability) in design and construction
project cost forecast reports, nominally being 3% of the project costs. This percentage has been assessed based on
management’s best estimate.
4. OPERATING SEGMENTS
Operating segments have been identified on the basis of internal reports of the consolidated entity that are regularly
reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources to the segments and to assess their
performance. The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Board of Directors. On a regular basis, the
board receives financial information on a company basis similar to the financial statements presented in the financial
report, to manage and allocate their resources.
5. REVENUE
Sales revenue
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
37
Rendering of services – construction contracts
152,837,930
142,511,568
6. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Other income and other gains and losses
Interest revenue
Net foreign exchange gain (loss)
Net gain (loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Subsidies and grants
Other revenue
Other income
Expenses
Employee benefits expense
Wages and salaries
Consolidated
2012
$
2,191,766
(154,467)
(3,411)
1,742
115,084
2011
$
955,789
(37,343)
261,708
22,550
193,196
2,150,714
1,395,900
38,382,854
28,364,268
Superannuation expense
2,777,017
1,922,696
Finance costs
Interest charges on finance leases
88,133
64,057
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
7. INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Major components of income tax expense for the years ended 30 June 2012 and 2011 are:
Income tax recognised in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Current income
Current income tax charge
38
Foreign tax on Gold Ridge project
Foreign tax on other projects
Adjustments in respect of current income tax of previous years
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
5,229,578
3,701,859
6,517
34,180
82,707
3,836,762
78,382
500,359
Deferred income tax
Relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences
1,389,624
32,202
Income tax expense reported in statement of comprehensive income
6,742,606
8,149,564
A reconciliation of income tax expense applicable to accounting profit before
income tax at the statutory income tax rate to income tax expense at the
consolidated entity’s effective income tax rate for the years ended 30 June 2012
and 2011 is as follows:
Accounting profit before income tax
19,858,061
29,247,488
At the statutory income tax rate of 30% (2010: 30%)
5,957,418
8,774,247
Add:
Non-deductible expenses
174,424
20,999
Effect of different tax rates on branches operating in different jurisdictions
-
(1,178,242)
Adjustments in respect of previous current income tax
153,264
532,561
Less:
Adjustments in respect of previous deferred income tax
Non assessable Income
457,500
-
-
-
At effective income tax rate of 27.8% (2010: 26.9%)
6,742,606
8,149,564
Income tax expense reported in statement of comprehensive income
6,742,606
8,149,564
Income tax recognised directly in equity
Current tax
Share issue costs
Deferred tax
Share issue expenses deductible over five years
-
-
-
-
642,622
642,622
Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following:
Deferred income tax assets
Accrued employee entitlements
Accrued superannuation
Accrued audit fees
Leasing
Section 40/880 deduction
Provision for long service leave
Provision for doubtful debts
Provision for project returns
Provision for warranty
Construction Industry long service leave
Tax losses
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Prepayments
Accrued interest
39
Consolidated
2011
$
304,049
169,850
-
50,317
530,079
68,511
457,500
259,558
1,382,440
-
-
2012
$
363,646
212,263
-
(47,914)
396,228
143,550
-
173,995
624,151
9,517
-
1,875,436
3,222,304
(3,613)
(39,143)
(42,756)
-
-
-
Net deferred tax asset
1,832,680
3,222,304
Current income tax assets and liabilities
Current tax asset
Income tax refund due
Current tax liabilities
Income tax payable
-
1,202,524
694,564
-
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
8. CURRENT ASSETS - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash on hand
Cash at bank
Cash on deposit
40
Cash at bank and in hand earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank rates.
Short-term deposits are made for varying periods of between one day and three
months depending on the immediate cash requirements of the consolidated entity,
and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is $33,861,242 (2011: $33,279,221).
Reconciliation of cash
For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents
comprise the following at 30 June:
Cash at bank
Cash on deposit
Reconciliation from the net profit after tax to the net cash flows
from operations
Net Profit after tax
Non-cash items
Depreciation
Profit/loss on sale of asset
Doubtful debt expense
Share based employee payments
Changes in assets and liabilities
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax asset
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables
(Decrease)/increase in provisions
(Decrease)/increase in tax liabilities
Increase in unearned income
Consolidated
2012
$
1,000
2011
$
1,000
8,835,242
6,278,221
25,025,000
27,000,000
33,861,242
33,279,221
8,836,242
6,279,222
25,025,000
27,000,000
33,861,242
33,279,221
13,115,455
21,097,926
685,665
3,411
542,423
-
-
1,525,000
240,212
50,622
4,164,582
(430,445)
1,095,454
1,156,202
1,389,624
160,727
(4,533,331)
1,766,218
(2,332,332)
(1,804,235)
1,897,089
2,464,677
514,363
(10,968,612)
Net cash from operating activities
16,240,192
15,560,503
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended 30 June 2012, the consolidated entity entered into the following non-cash investing and financing
activities which are not reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows:
-
the consolidated entity acquired $853 of equipment under finance leases (2011: $411,217)
9. CURRENT ASSETS - TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables
Less: Provision for impairment of receivables
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
21,220,067
25,923,621
(1,525,000)
(1,525,000)
19,695,067
24,398,621
88,441
104,187
Accrued revenue
Term deposits held as security (refer to Note 24)
Other receivables
5,035,260
2,734,862
41
560,068
33,194
25,378,835
27,270,864
Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 day terms.
Impairment of receivables
Movements in the provision for impairment of receivables are as follows:
Opening balance
Additional provisions recognised
Closing balance
Past due but not impaired
Customers with balances past due but without provision for impairment
of receivables amount to $5,147,472 as at 30 June 2012 ($79,299 as at
30 June 2011).
The ageing of the past due but not impaired receivables is as follows:
0 to 3 months overdue
3 to 6 months overdue
Over 6 months overdue
1,525,000
-
-
1,525,000
1,525,000
1,525,000
220,815
280,751
4,645,906
5,147,472
48,271
31,028
-
79,299
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
10. CURRENT ASSETS - INVENTORIES
Stock on hand - at cost
11. CURRENT ASSETS - OTHER
Prepayments
42
12. NON-CURRENT ASSETS - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Plant and equipment - at cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Plant and equipment under lease
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Reconciliations
Reconciliations of the written down values at the beginning
and end of the current and previous financial year are set
out below:
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
578,464
1,673,918
231,305
203,460
3,121,811
2,203,916
(1,568,673)
(992,040)
1,553,138
1,211,876
1,710,209
1,709,356
(1,071,460)
(948,593)
638,749
760,763
2,191,887
1,972,639
Balance at 1 July 2010
Additions
Depreciation expense
Balance at 30 June 2011
Additions
Write off of assets
Transfers in/(out)
Depreciation expense
Balance at 30 June 2012
Plant &
Equipment
Under Lease
$
572,643
411,217
(223,097)
760,763
86,174
-
35,091
(243,279)
638,749
Plant &
Equipment
$
861,290
670,332
(319,746)
Total
$
1,433,933
1,081,549
(542,843)
1,211,876
1,972,639
822,150
(3,411)
(35,091)
908,324
(3,411)
-
(442,386)
(685,665)
1,553,138
2,191,887
13. CURRENT LIABILITIES - TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
Trade payables
GST payable
Accrued expenses
Other payables
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
8,075,027
13,017,945
592,908
290,901
1,299,837
3,864
826,968
911,503
10,258,673
14,760,280
43
Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 day terms. The net of GST payable and GST
receivable is remitted to the appropriate tax body on a monthly basis
Refer to note 21 for further information on financial instruments.
14. BORROWINGS
Borrowings - current liabilities
Lease liability
Borrowings – non-current liabilities
Lease liability
Total secured liabilities
The total secured liabilities (current and non-current) are as follows:
Lease liability
Assets pledged as security
The lease liabilities are effectively secured as the rights to the leased assets,
recognised in the statement of financial position, revert to the lessor in the event
of default.The lease liabilities are effectively secured as the rights to the leased
assets, recognised in the statement of financial position, revert to the lessor in the
event of default.
Refer to note 21 for further information on financial instruments.
246,701
526,904
232,335
401,581
479,036
928,485
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
44
15. PROVISIONS
Provisions – current liabilities
Provision for annual leave
Provision for warranty and defects liability
Provision for project returns
Movement in provisions
Provision for annual leave
Balance at beginning of year
Additional provisions recognised
Amounts used
Balance at end of year
Provision for warranty and defects liability
Balance at beginning of year
Reduction in provisions
Amounts used
Balance at end of year
Provision for project returns
Balance at beginning of year
Additional provisions recognised
Amounts used
Balance at end of year
Provisions – non-current liabilities
Long service leave
Movement in provisions
Provision for long service leave
Balance at beginning of year
Additional provisions recognised
Amounts used
Balance at end of year
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
1,212,153
1,013,497
2,080,502
4,608,135
579,984
865,192
3,872,639
6,486,824
1,013,497
1,247,680
727,519
961,898
(1,049,024)
(675,920)
1,212,153
1,013,497
4,608,135
6,445,789
(2,527,633)
(1,837,654)
-
-
2,080,502
4,608,135
865,192
1,346,121
1,007,984
1,490,842
(1,293,192)
(1,971,771)
579,984
865,192
478,500
228,370
228,370
250,130
-
-
228,370
-
478,500
228,370
16. CURRENT LIABILITIES – UNEARNED REVENUE / ADVANCED COSTS / WORK IN PROGRESS
Unearned Revenue
Contracts in progress
Progress billings
Construction costs to date plus recognised profits
17. EQUITY - ISSUED CAPITAL
2012
$
6,101,140
Consolidated
2011
$
5,586,777
213,719,843
236,240,367
207,618,703
230,653,590
6,101,140
5,586,777
45
Consolidated
Consolidated
2012
Shares
2011
Shares
2012
$
2011
$
Ordinary shares - fully paid
150,000,000
150,000,000
28,501,548
28,501,548
Movements in ordinary share capital
Details
Share split (120,000:1) (i)
Issue of shares under prospectus (ii)
Less Capital raising costs
Deferred tax asset on capital raising costs
Balance as at 30 June 2011
No of shares
120,000,000
$
1,000
30,000,000
30,000,000
(2,142,074)
642,622
150,000,000
28,501,548
Balance as at 30 June 2012
150,000,000
28,501,548
i)
ii)
As approved on 10 February 2011, the board agreed to a share split of 120,000:1, becoming 120,000,000 shares
on issue.
Under the prospectus issued by the consolidated entity on 18 March 2011, the consolidated entity issued 30
million shares at $1.00 per share, to raise $30,000,000. The consolidated entity listed on the Australian Securities
Exchange on 19 April 2011
Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry a right to dividends
Changes to the Corporation Law abolished the authorised capital and par value concept in relation to share capital from 1
July 1998. Therefore, the consolidated entity does not have a limited amount of authorised capital and issued shares do
not have a par value.
Options
As at 30 June 2012, the unissued ordinary shares of the consolidated entity under option totalled 2,500,000 (as at 30 June
2011: 2,500,000):
Number of shares under option
Grant date
Expiry date Exercise price
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
19/4/2011
19/4/2011
19/4/2011
19/4/2011
19/4/2013
19/4/2014
19/4/2015
19/4/2016
$1.25
$1.50
$1.80
$2.10
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
18. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS RESERVE
Balance at beginning of year
Additional amounts recognised
Balance at end of year
Consolidated
2012
$
50,622
240,212
290,834
2011
$
-
50,622
50,622
46
The above share based employee benefits reserve relates to share options granted by the consolidated entity to its
employees under its employee share option plan.
19. EQUITY - RETAINED PROFITS
Retained profits/(accumulated losses) at the beginning of the financial year
12,282,024
10,184,098
Profit after income tax expense for the year
Payment of dividends
Retained profits at the end of the financial year
13,115,455
21,097,926
(12,000,000)
(19,000,000)
13,397,479
12,282,024
20. EQUITY - DIVIDENDS
Dividends
Year ended 30 June 2011
Dividend paid 5 July 2010 (fully franked at 30% tax rate):
5 cents per ordinary share
Dividend paid 27 October 2010 (fully franked at 30% tax rate):
7.5 cents per ordinary share
Dividend paid 4 January 2011 (unfranked):
3.33 cents per ordinary share
Year ended 30 June 2012
Dividend paid 10 November 2011 (fully franked at 30% tax rate):
4 cents per ordinary share
Dividend paid 13 March 2012 (fully franked at 30% tax rate):
4 cents per ordinary share
6,000,000
9,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
6,000,000
12,000,000
19,000,000
On 20 August 2012, the consolidated entity declared a fully franked final dividend of 4.0 cents per share, an
aggregate of $6,000,000. The Record Date of the dividend is 17 September 2012 and the proposed payment
date is 28 September 2012.
Franking credits
Franking credits available for subsequent financial years based on a tax rate of 30%
1,663,271
208,058
21. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial risk management objectives
The consolidated entity is exposed to risks in relation to its financial instruments. These risks include market risk
(consisting of foreign currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.
A summary of the consolidated entity’s financial instruments are as follows:
Financial Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Total financial assets
Financial Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Finance lease liabilities
Total financial liabilities
47
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
33,861,242
33,279,221
25,378,835
27,270,864
59,240,077
60,550,085
10,258,673
14,760,280
479,036
928,485
10,737,709
15,688,765
Capital Management
The consolidated entity manages its capital to ensure the ability to continue as a going concern while maximising the
return to stakeholders. The capital structure of the consolidated entity consists of equity in the form of issued capital,
reserves and retained earnings. There is no requirement for borrowings at this stage, as there are sufficient reserves of
cash balances.
Market risk
Foreign currency risk
The consolidated entity is not currently exposed to any material risks in relation to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
Interest rate risk
The board has considered the consolidated entity’s exposure to interest rate risk by analysing the effect on profit and
equity of an interest rate increase or decrease of one percentage point in the following table:
Effect of increase in interest rate
Effect
on profit
before tax
Effect on
equity
Increase
in interest
rate
Effect of decrease in interest rate
Decrease
in interest
rate
Effect
on profit
before tax
Effect on
equity
2012
Interest revenue
Interest expense
2011
Interest revenue
Interest expense
1%
1%
1%
1%
435,856
435,856
(206)
(206)
435,650
435,650
169,310
169,310
(1,238)
(1,238)
168,072
168,072
1%
1%
1%
1%
(435,856)
(435,856)
205
205
(435,651)
(435,651)
(169,575)
(169,575)
1,234
1,234
(168,341)
(168,341)
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
21. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (CONTINUED)
Credit risk management
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default on its contractual obligations, resulting in financial loss to the
consolidated entity. The consolidated entity has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties as a
means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults. The consolidated entity uses independent rating agencies,
publicly available financial information and other trading records to rate its major customers. Legally binding contracts are
entered into to determine payment terms in relation to major projects.
The credit risk on liquid funds is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit ratings assigned by
international credit rating agencies.
48
The consolidated entity does not have significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or group
of counterparties.
Liquidity risk management
Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the board of directors, which has established an
appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the management of the consolidated entity’s short-, medium- and
long-term funding and liquidity management requirements. The consolidated entity manages liquidity risk by maintaining
adequate reserves and banking facilities, by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows, and by matching the
maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities.
Liquidity and interest rate risk tables
The following tables detail the consolidated entity’s remaining contractual maturity for its financial instrument liabilities.
The tables have been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on
which the financial liabilities are required to be paid. The tables include both interest and principal cash flows disclosed
as remaining contractual maturities and therefore these totals may differ from their carrying amount in the statement of
financial position.
Non-derivatives
2012
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables
Interest-bearing - fixed rate
Lease liability
Total non-derivatives
2011
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables
Interest-bearing - fixed rate
Lease liability
Total non-derivatives
Weighted
average
interest rate
%
Less than
6 months
$
6 to 12
months
$
Over
12 months
$
Remaining
contractual
maturities
$
-
10,258,673
-
-
10,258,673
9.37
136,866
10,395,539
109,835
109,835
232,335
479,036
232,335
10,737,709
-
14,760,280
-
-
14,760,280
9.96
355,958
15,116,238
170,946
170,946
401,581
928,485
401,581
15,688,765
Fair value of financial instruments
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with their carrying amounts in the statement of financial
position, for the consolidated entity are as follows:
Assets
Cash at bank
Cash on deposit
Trade receivables
Liabilities
Trade payables
Lease liability
Carrying
amount
$
8,836,242
25,025,000
25,378,835
59,240,077
2012
Fair value
$
Carrying
amount
$
2011
Fair value
$
8,836,242
6,279,222
6,279,222
25,025,000
27,000,000
27,000,000
49
25,378,835
27,270,864
27,270,864
59,240,077
60,550,086
60,550,086
10,258,673
10,258,673
14,760,280
14,760,280
479,036
10,737,709
479,036
928,485
928,485
10,737,709
15,688,765
15,688,765
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are determined in accordance with generally accepted pricing models
based on discounted cash flow analysis and approximate their carrying value.
22. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES
Directors
The following persons were directors of GR Engineering Services Limited during the financial year:
Executive directors
Joe Ricciardo
Tony Patrizi
(Managing Director)
(Executive Director)
Non-executive directors
Barry Patterson
Terrence Strapp
Peter Hood
(Non-Executive Chairman)
(Non-Executive Director)
(Non-Executive Director)
Other key management personnel
The following persons also had the authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities
of the consolidated entity, directly or indirectly, during the financial year:
Executives
Geoffrey Jones
David Sala Tenna
Joe Totaro
Rodney Schier
Peter Allen
(Chief Operating Officer)
(General Manager)
(Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary)
(Engineering Manager)
(Manager – Process)
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
22. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
Remuneration of key management personnel
Detailed information on remuneration of key management personnel is set out in the Remuneration Report in the
Directors Report.
The aggregate compensation made to key management personnel of the consolidated entity is set out below:
50
Short term benefits
Post employment benefits
Share based payments
Other
Shareholding
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
2,561,614
1,699,787
215,867
240,212
73,394
146,953
50,622
50,000
3,091,087
1,947,362
The number of shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and other members of key
management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties, is set out below:
Balance at
the start of
the year
Received
as part of
remuneration
Additions/
other*
Disposals
Balance at
the end of
the year
2012
Ordinary shares
Joe Ricciardo
Tony Patrizi
Barry Patterson
Terry Strapp
Peter Hood
Geoffrey Jones
David Sala Tenna
Joe Totaro
2011
Ordinary shares
Joe Ricciardo
Tony Patrizi
Barry Patterson
Terry Strapp
Peter Hood
Geoffrey Jones
David Sala Tenna
Joe Totaro
12,000,000
12,000,000
12,000,000
300,000
500,000
150,000
16,800,000
12,000,000
65,750,000
100
100
100
-
-
-
140
100
540
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(2,975,000)
9,025,000
(2,975,000)
9,025,000
(1,500,000)
10,500,000
-
-
-
300,000
500,000
150,000
(2,975,000)
13,825,000
(3,000,000)
9,000,000
(13,425,000)
52,325,000
11,999,900
11,999,900
11,999,900
300,000
500,000
150,000
16,799,860
11,999,900
65,749,460
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12,000,000
12,000,000
12,000,000
300,000
500,000
150,000
16,800,000
12,000,000
65,750,000
* Other represents a share split during the year of 120,000:1
51
Option holding
The number of options over ordinary shares in the parent entity held during the financial year by each director and
other members of key management personnel of the consolidated entity, including their personally related parties,
is set out below:
2012
Options over ordinary shares
Joe Ricciardo
Tony Patrizi
Barry Patterson
Terry Strapp
Peter Hood
Geoffrey Jones
David Sala Tenna
Joe Totaro
2011
Options over ordinary shares
Joe Ricciardo
Tony Patrizi
Barry Patterson
Terry Strapp
Peter Hood
Geoffrey Jones
David Sala Tenna
Joe Totaro
Balance at
the start of
the year
-
-
-
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Granted
Exercised
Expired/
forfeited/
other
Balance at
the end of
the year
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
-
-
-
2,500,000
-
-
2,500,000
Other transactions with key management personnel
Other than the transactions noted in note 26, there have been no other transactions noted with key
management personnel.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
23. REMUNERATION OF AUDITORS
During the financial year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, the
auditor of the consolidated entity, and its network firms:
Audit services - Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Audit or review of the financial statements
Other services - Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
52
Tax compliance
Investigating Accountants' Report
Other services - Deloitte Corporate Finance Pty Ltd
Professional services in relation to Initial Public Offering
2012
$
2011
$
129,137
67,000
25,860
-
25,860
30,230
60,100
90,330
154,997
157,330
2,667
2,667
136,828
136,828
24. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The consolidated entity has bank guarantees in place as at 30 June 2012 of $9,002,427 (2011: $6,734,862).
The consolidated entity has a bank guarantee facility with the National Australia Bank to provide bank guarantees to
support project performance in favour of certain clients of the consolidated entity. The facility has an approved limit of
$4,000,000, with an expiry date of 30 November 2012. The facility is secured by a fixed and floating charge over all the
assets of the consolidated entity and a term deposit letter of set-off over a $5,035,260 term deposit (2011: $2,734,862).
Certain claims arising out of engineering and construction contracts have been made by or against the consolidated entity
in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve litigation or arbitration.
The consolidated entity commenced debt recovery proceedings against Gold Ridge Mining Limited (GRML) on 28 June
2011 to recover outstanding costs and associated damages of around $4.5 million relating to a lump sum EPC contract
for the expansion and refurbishment of the Gold Ridge Mine in the Solomon Islands.
On 18 May 2012 GRML served GR Engineering with a further amended defence and counterclaim, including a new and
further counterclaim for gold losses arising from alleged defects and alleged representations regarding performance.
That value of GRML’s counterclaim is currently in the order of $45 million – over $42 million comprised of losses which
GR Engineering considers as having no basis, of an ambit nature and in any case are of a consequential and indirect
nature, and therefore expressly and specifically excluded from the EPC contract between GR Engineering and GRML.
An arbitration hearing is scheduled for November 2012 in relation to the debt and the counterclaim. The Directors of the
consolidated entity consider that GRML’s counter claim is an ambit claim and that the consolidated entity will continue to
vigorously defend its position. Accordingly, no provision has been reflected in the financial statements in relation to the
counter claim.
25. COMMITMENTS
The consolidated entity has leased certain of its office equipment under finance leases. The average lease term is 3
years (2011: 3 years). The consolidated entity has options to purchase the equipment for a nominal amount at the end
of the lease terms. The consolidated entity’s obligations under finance leases are secured by the lessors’ title to the
leased assets.
Finance Leases
Not longer than 1 year
Longer than 1 year and not longer than 5 years
Longer than 5 years
Minimum lease payments
Less: future finance charges
Present value of minimum lease payments
Consolidated
2011
$
591,456
443,762
-
2012
$
281,914
250,013
-
531,927
1,035,218
(52,891)
479,036
106,733
928,485
53
The consolidated entity has operating leases that relate to leases of office buildings with lease terms of between 2 and 5
years. All operating lease contracts contain clauses for market rental reviews.
Non-cancellable Operating Lease Commitments
Not longer than 1 year
Longer than 1 year and not longer than 5 years
Longer than 5 years
Total lease payments
26. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
2012
$
2011
$
1,727,652
1,409,799
2,872,652
3,016,766
-
-
4,600,304
4,426,565
During the year ended 30 June 2012 the consolidated entity leased office space at 71-73 Daly Street from Ashguard
Pty Ltd. Directors of the consolidated entity, namely Joe Ricciardo, Tony Patrizi, and Barry Patterson, each have a non
controlling interest in Ashguard Pty Ltd. Total payments to Ashguard Pty Ltd in the year ended 30 June 2012 amounted
to $286,497 including GST (2011: $279,066). The balance payable at 30 June 2012 was $21,482 (2011: $20,877).
During the year ended 30 June 2012 the consolidated entity provided engineering services and procurement of materials
for Crushing Services International Pty Ltd (a subsidiary of Mineral Resources Limited), a company in which Joe Ricciardo
is a non-executive director. The total amount invoiced to Crushing Services International Pty Ltd in the year ended 30
June 2012 was $3,679,173 including GST (2011: $1,595,425). The balance outstanding at 30 June 2012 was $336,519
(2011: $32,453).
In previous financial years the consolidated entity provided engineering services to Mineral Resources Limited,
a company in which Joe Ricciardo is a non-executive director. In the year ended 30 June 2012 there were zero
transactions with Mineral Resources Limited (2011: $83,600). The balance outstanding at 30 June 2012 was nil
(2011: nil).
In previous financial years the consolidated entity provided engineering services to Optiro Pty Ltd, a company in which
Joe Ricciardo and Tony Patrizi each hold non-controlling interests. In the year ended 30 June 2012 there were zero
transactions with Optiro Pty Ltd (2011: $29,593). The balance outstanding at 30 June 2012 was nil (2011: nil).
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
27. PARENT ENTITY INFORMATION
Set out below is the supplementary information about the parent entity.
54
Statement of comprehensive income
Profit after income tax
Total comprehensive income
Statement of financial position
Total current assets
Total assets
Total current liabilities
Total liabilities
Equity
Issued capital
Equity-based payments reserve
Retained profits
Total equity
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
13,115,455
21,097,924
13,115,455
21,097,924
60,049,846
63,629,987
64,074,413
68,824,930
21,173,717
27,360,785
21,884,552
27,990,736
28,501,548
28,501,548
290,834
50,622
13,397,479
12,282,024
42,189,861
40,834,194
28. EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
On 10 July 2012 GR Engineering Services Limited entered into an agreement with Assetinsure Pty Ltd by which
Assetinsure Pty Ltd agreed to provide the consolidated entity with a $10,000,000 performance bond facility. The
consolidated entity’s contingent obligations under the performance bond facility are secured by a Deed of Indemnity and
Guarantee, by which the consolidated entity agrees to indemnify Assetinsure against all and any loss arising from the
provision of bonds under the performance bond facility.
On 20 August 2012, the consolidated entity declared a fully franked dividend of 4.0 cents per share, an aggregate
of $6,000,000. The Record Date of the dividend is 17 September 2012 and the proposed payment date is
28 September 2012.
No other matter or circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2012 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect
the consolidated entity’s operations, the results of those operations, or the consolidated entity’s state of affairs in future
financial years.
29. EARNINGS PER SHARE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Profit after income tax attributable to the owners of GR Engineering
Services Limited
Consolidated
2012
$
2011
$
13,115,455
21,097,924
Number
Number
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic earnings
per share
150,000,000
125,917,808
55
Adjustments for calculation of diluted earnings per share:
Weighted average number of employee share options issued
-
14,252
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating diluted earnings
per share
150,000,000
125,932,060
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
cents
8.74
8.74
cents
16.76
16.75
Note: the options outstanding at 30 June 2012 are out of the money and therefore excluded from the weighted average
number of ordinary shares for the purpose of diluted earnings per share.
NOTE 30. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS
The consolidated entity has established an employee share option plan named the GR Engineering Services Limited
Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP). The consolidated entity may offer options to subscribe for shares in the
consolidated entity to eligible persons under the ESOP. Options offered under the employee share option plan are to be
offered on such terms as the board determines and the offer must set out specified information including the number of
options, the period of the offer, calculation of the exercise price and any exercise conditions.
The exercise price is to be determined by the Board in its absolute discretion and set out in the offer provided that the
exercise price is not less than the average market price on ASX on the five trading days prior to the day the Directors
resolve to grant the option(s).
The following equity based payment arrangements existed at 30 June 2012:
The consolidated entity has issued a total of 2,500,000 Options to its Chief Operating Officer, which confer the right of
one ordinary share for every option held. These options have exercise conditions attached, whereby they will lapse if the
employee ceases to become an eligible person, for any reason other than a specified reason as outlined in the terms of
the option.
Number of shares
under option
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
Grant
date
19/4/2011
19/4/2011
19/4/2011
19/4/2011
Vesting
date
19/4/2012
19/4/2013
19/4/2014
19/4/2015
Expiry
date
19/4/2013
19/4/2014
19/4/2015
19/4/2016
Exercise
price
Fair Value at
Grant Date
$1.25
$1.50
$1.80
$2.10
$0.1740
$0.2450
$0.2400
$0.2600
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012notes to the
FinAnciAl stAtements
FOR tHE yEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2012
cONtINUED
NOTE 30. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS (CONTINUED)
Set out below are summaries of options granted under the plan:
Grant date
Expiry date
2012
19/4/2011 19/4/2013
19/4/2011 19/4/2014
19/4/2011 19/4/2015
19/4/2011 19/4/2016
56
$1.25
$1.50
$1.80
$2.10
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
2,500,000
Weighted average exercise price
1.72
2011
19/4/2011 19/4/2013
19/4/2011 19/4/2014
19/4/2011 19/4/2015
19/4/2011 19/4/2016
$1.25
$1.50
$1.80
$2.10
Weighted average exercise price
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
2,500,000
1.72
Exercise
price
Balance at
the start of
the year
Granted Exercised
Expired/
forfeited/
other
Balance at
the end of
the year Exercisable
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
-
-
-
750,000
500,000
1.72
1.25
500,000
500,000
750,000
750,000
2,500,000
1.72
-
-
-
-
-
-
Share price at grant date
Exercise price
Expected volatility
Dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate
Fair value at grant date
Tranche 1
Tranche 2
Tranche 3
Tranche 4
$1.00
$1.25
50.00%
4.00%
3.10%
$0.174
$1.00
$1.50
50.00%
4.00%
3.10%
$0.245
$1.00
$1.80
50.00%
4.00%
3.10%
$0.240
$1.00
$2.10
50.00%
4.00%
3.10%
$0.260
NOTE 31. SUBSIDIARIES
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the following subsidiaries at the end of the reporting period.
Name of subsidiary
GR Engineering Services (Indonesia) Pty Limited
GR Engineering Services (Argentina) Pty Limited
PT GR Engineering Services Indonesia*
GR Engineering Services (Africa)
GR Engineering Services (UK)
GR Engineering Services (Ghana) Limited**
GR Engineering Services (Côte D’Ivoire)**
GR Engineering Services (Mali)**
Country of
incorporation
Australia
Australia
Indonesia
Mauritius
United Kingdom
Ghana
Côte D’Ivoire
Mali
Equity holding
2011
%
2012
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
57
*
PT GR Engineering Services Indonesia is 90% owned by GR Engineering Services Limited and 10% owned by GR
Engineering Services (Indonesia) Pty Limited
** GR Engineering Services (Ghana) Limited, GR Engineering Services (Côte D’Ivoire) and GR Engineering Services
(Mali) are 100% owned by GR Engineering Services (Africa).
All of the above subsidiaries have been incorporated during the current financial year and are currently dormant.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
directors’ declArAtion
The directors declare that:
(a)
(b)
(c)
In the directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts
as and when they become due and payable;
In the directors’ opinion, the attached financial statements are in compliance with International Financial
Reporting Standards, as stated in note 2 (b) to the financial statements;
In the directors’ opinion, the attached financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001, including compliance with accounting standards and giving a true and fair view of the
financial position and performance of the Company; and
(d)
The directors have been given the declarations required by s.295A of the Corporations Act 2001
58
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors made pursuant to s.295(5) of the Corporations Act 2001.
On behalf of the Directors
JOSEPH MARIO PAUL RICCIARDO
Managing Director
Date: 24th August 2012
independent Auditor’s
report
59
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012independent Auditor’s
report
cONtINUED
60
corporAte GoVernAnce
stAtement
61
GR Engineering Services Ltd (“the Company”) has adopted comprehensive systems of control and accountability
as the basis for the administration of corporate governance. The Board is committed to administering the policies
and procedures with openness and integrity, pursuing the true spirit of corporate governance commensurate with the
Company’s needs. To the extent they are applicable, the Company has adopted the Corporate Governance Principles and
Recommendations (“Principles & Recommendations”) as published by the ASX Corporate Governance Council.
A summary of the Company’s corporate governance practices is set out below.
Summary of Board Charter
The role of the Board is to provide leadership for and supervision of the Company’s senior management. The Board
provides the strategic direction of the Company and regularly measures the progression by senior management of that
strategic direction. The Board is responsible for promoting the success of the Company through its oversight role. The
Board also reviews the Company’s policies on risk oversight and management, internal compliance and control, its
Code of Conduct, and legal compliance. There are mechanisms in place so that the Board can satisfy itself that senior
management has developed and implemented a sound system of risk management and internal control in relation to
financial reporting risk and material business risk. The Board monitors and reviews senior management’s performance
and implementation of strategy.
The Board Charter also sets out quantitative and qualitative materiality thresholds.
The Board delegates to senior management the responsibility of the day-to-day activities in fulfilling the Board’s
responsibility. Senior executives are responsible for supporting the Managing Director and assisting the Managing
Director in the running of the general operations and financial business of the Company, in accordance with the delegated
authority of the Board.
Senior executives are responsible for reporting all matters which fall within the Company’s materiality thresholds at first
instance to the Managing Director or, if the matter concerns the Managing Director then directly to the Chair or the lead
independent Director, as appropriate.
The Board Charter describes the division of responsibilities between the Chair, the lead independent Director and the
Managing Director.
The role of non-executive and independent directors is also set out in the Board Charter.
Summary of Audit Committee Charter
The role of the audit committee is to monitor and review the integrity of the financial reporting of the Company and to
review significant financial reporting judgments. The audit committee is also to review the Company’s internal financial
control system and risk management systems and to monitor, review and oversee the external audit function.
The audit committee has the power to conduct or authorise investigations into any matters within the audit committee’s
scope of responsibilities. The audit committee has the authority, as it deems necessary or appropriate, to retain
independent legal, accounting or other advisors.
The audit committee also assesses whether external reporting is consistent with audit committee members’
information and knowledge and is adequate for shareholder needs and assesses the management processes
supporting external reporting.
Summary of Nomination Committee Charter
The role of the nomination committee is to effectively examine the selection and appointment practices of the Company.
The nomination committee regularly reviews the size and composition of the Board and makes recommendations to the
Board on any appropriate changes. The nomination committee identifies and assesses necessary and desirable Director
competencies with a view to enhancing the Board.
The nomination committee also regularly reviews the time required from non-executive Directors and whether non-
executive Directors are meeting that requirement.
Initial Director appointments are made by the Board. Any new Director will be required to stand for election at the
Company’s next annual general meeting following their appointment.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012corporAte GoVernAnce
stAtement
cONtINUED
Summary of Remuneration Committee Charter
The function of the remuneration committee is to review and make appropriate recommendations on remuneration
packages of executive Directors, non-executive Directors and senior executives. The remuneration committee is also
responsible for reviewing any employee incentive and equity-based plans, including the appropriateness of performance
hurdles and total payments proposed.
Summary of Remuneration Policy
Emoluments of Directors and senior executives are set by reference to payments made by other companies of similar
size and industry, and by reference to the skills and experience of the Directors and executives.
62
The Company’s policy is to remunerate non-executive Directors at a fixed fee for time, commitment and responsibilities.
Remuneration for non-executive Directors is not linked to individual performance. This policy is subject to annual review.
From time to time, and subject to obtaining the relevant approvals, the Company may grant options to non-executive
Directors. The grant of options is designed to recognise and reward efforts as well as to provide non-executive Directors
with additional incentive to continue those efforts for the benefit of the Company.
Executive pay and reward consists of a base salary and performance incentives. Long term performance incentives may
include options granted at the discretion of the Board and subject to obtaining the relevant regulatory and shareholder
approvals. The grant of options is designed to recognise and reward efforts as well as to provide additional incentive and
may be subject to the successful completion of performance hurdles.
Executives are prohibited from entering into transactions or arrangements which limit the economic risk of participating
in unvested entitlements.
Summary of Code of Conduct
The Code of Conduct sets out the principles and standards which the Board, management and employees of the
Company are encouraged to strive towards when dealing with each other, shareholders, other stakeholders and the
broader community.
The Company is to comply with all legislative and common law requirements which affect its business. The Company
will deal with others in a way that is fair and will not engage in deceptive practices.
The Code of Conduct sets out directives for Directors, management and staff relating to conflicts of interests, protection
of the Company’s assets and confidentiality.
Summary of Policy and Procedure for Selection and (Re)Appointment of Directors
In considering new candidates, the nomination committee evaluates the range of skills, experience and expertise of
the existing Board. In particular, the nomination committee is to identify the particular skills that will best increase the
Board’s effectiveness. In this process, consideration is also given to the balance of independent Directors on the Board,
while reference is made to the Company’s size and operations as they evolve from time to time. Any appointment made
by the Board is subject to ratification by shareholders at the next general meeting.
All Directors are required to consider the number and nature of their directorships and calls on their time from other
commitments.
Shareholders shall be informed of the names and details of candidates submitted for election as Directors, in order to
enable shareholders to make an informed decision regarding the election.
Summary of Process for Performance Evaluation
The Chair evaluates the performance of the Board by way of an informal round-table discussion with all directors and
through questionnaires completed by each director.
The Chair reviews the performance of the committees of the Board by way on an informal round-table discussion with all
directors and through questionnaires completed by each director who is a member of the committee being evaluated.
Individual director’s performance evaluations are completed by the Chair. The Chair meets with each individual director
and reviews questionnaires completed by each director.
The Managing Director’s performance evaluation is conducted by the Chair. The Chair conducts a performance
evaluation of the Managing Director by way of meeting with the Managing Director and with an informal round-table
discussion with all directors, and by reference to the Managing Director’s key performance indicators which are set by
the Nomination Committee.
The Managing Director reviews the performance of the senior executives. The Managing Director conducts a
performance evaluation of the senior executives by way of on-going informal monitoring throughout each financial year
and at an annual formal interview.
Summary of Policy for Trading in Company Securities
The Board has adopted a policy which prohibits dealing in the Company’s securities by directors, officers, specified
employees (including connected persons) and, contractors when those persons possess inside information. The policy
also contains a blackout period within which directors, officers and employees are prohibited from trading. The policy
prohibits short term or speculative trading of the Company’s securities. Trading may be permitted in a blackout period
in certain exceptional circumstances subject to obtaining prior written clearance. Directors, officers and specified
employees are required to obtain clearance prior to trading at all times.
63
Summary of Diversity Policy
The Board has adopted a Diversity Policy which describes the Company’s commitment to ensuring a diverse mix of
skills and talent exists amongst its directors, officers and employees, to enhance Company performance. The Diversity
Policy addresses equal opportunities in the hiring, training and career advancement of directors, officers and employees.
The Diversity Policy outlines the process by which the Board will set measurable objectives to achieve the aims of
its Diversity Policy. The Board is responsible for monitoring Company performance in meeting the Diversity Policy
requirements, including the achievement of any diversity objectives.
Women comprise approximately 23% of the Company’s total workforce and approximately 11% of the Company’s
professionally qualified personnel. Women are not represented in the Company’s senior executive team.
The Board recognises the under representation by women in its professional and executive workforce. Therefore and
subject to identifying female candidates with the requisite qualifications and experience, it is the Board’s objective to
improve on this percentage and if possible increase it to 15% by 30 June 2014.
The Company will continue to facilitate flexible working hours to enable all employees to meet ongoing training
and education and in particular in enable female staff members to balance their professional and domestic
commitments. This is an important element of the Company’s strategy of attracting more professionally qualified
women to its workforce.
The Company listed on ASX in April 2011 after an exhaustive search for Board members of suitable skills, experience
and qualifications. The Board is comprised of three male non-executive and two male executive directors. The Board
recognises that it would be beneficial to have on its Board an independent female non-executive director to widen
the Board’s skill set and to add experience and broadened perspective to the assessment of information and decision
making. However, the Company has not sought to expand its Board during the year under review and therefore has not
sought candidates for any Board position.
Subject to the Company achieving this strategy for growth, the Board will identify a suitable candidate for an additional
non-executive directorship. Consistent with its policy on gender diversity the Company will consider a female for this
position provided that the appointment satisfies Board composition requirements at the time.
Summary of Compliance Procedures
The Board has adopted Compliance Procedures to assist it to comply with the Listing Rules disclosure requirements.
Under the Compliance Procedures, a responsible officer is appointed who is primarily responsible for ensuring the
Company complies with its disclosure obligations. The duties of the responsible officer are set out in the Compliance
Procedures. The Compliance Procedures provide guidelines as to the type of information that needs to be disclosed
and encourages thorough recording of disclosure decision making. The Compliance Procedures contain information on
avoiding a false market, safeguarding confidentiality of corporate information, and information on external communication
for the purpose of protecting the Company’s price sensitive information. The Compliance Procedures also provide
guidance relating to potential disclosure material.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012corporAte GoVernAnce
stAtement
cONtINUED
Summary of Procedure for the Selection, Appointment and Rotation of External Auditor
The Board is responsible for the initial appointment of the external auditor and the appointment of a new external auditor
when any vacancy arises, as per the recommendations of the Audit Committee.
Candidates for the position of external auditor of the Company must be able to demonstrate complete independence
from the Company and an ability to maintain independence through the engagement period.
The Audit Committee will review the performance of the external auditor on an annual basis and make any
recommendations to the Board.
Summary of Shareholder Communication Strategy
64
The Board aims to ensure that the shareholders are informed of all major developments affecting the Company. The
Company provides shareholder materials directly to shareholders through electronic means. A shareholder may request
a hard copy of the Company’s annual report to be posted to them. The Company maintains a website on which the
Company makes certain information available on a regular basis.
Summary of Risk Management Policy
The Board has adopted a Risk Management Policy. Under the policy, the Board delegates day-to-day management of
risk to the Managing Director, with the assistance of senior management as required. The Policy sets out the role and
accountabilities of the Managing Director. It also contains the Company’s risk profile and describes some of the policies
and practices the Company has in place to manage specific business risks.
The Managing Director is required to report on the progress of, and on all matters associated with risk management.
The Managing Director is to report to the Board as to the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its material
business risks at least annually.
The Board is responsible for approving the Company’s policies on risk oversight and management and satisfying
itself at least annually that management has developed and implemented a sound system of risk management and
internal control.
As the Company’s activities develop in size, nature and scope, the size of the Board and the implementation of additional
corporate governance structures will be given further consideration.
ASX CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COUNCIL PRINCIPLES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Board sets out below its “if not, why not” report. Where the Company’s corporate governance practices follow
a recommendation, the Board has made appropriate statements reporting on the adoption of the recommendation.
Where, after due consideration, the Company’s corporate governance practices depart from a recommendation, the
Board has offered full disclosure and a reason for the adoption of its own practice, in compliance with the “if not,
why not” regime.
The Company has not made an early transition to the amended 2nd edition Principles & Recommendations and
the following “if not, why not” report reflects this. The Company will report against the 2nd edition Principles &
Recommendations for its financial year commencing 1 July 2011.
Recommendation
ASX
P & R1
If not,
why not2
Recommendation
ASX
P & R1
If not,
why not2
65
1.1
1.2
1.3³
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6³
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4³
5.1
5.2³
6.1
6.2³
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4³
8.1
8.2
8.3³
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
1
Indicates where the Company has followed the Principles & Recommendations.
2
Indicates where the Company has provided “if not, why not” disclosure.
3
Indicates an information based recommendation. Information based recommendations are not adopted or reported
against using “if not, why not” disclosure – information required is either provided or it is not.
PRINCIPLE 1: LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
Recommendation 1.1: Companies should establish the functions reserved to the Board and those delegated to senior
executives and disclose those functions.
Disclosure:
The Company has established the functions reserved to the Board and those delegated to seniors executives and has set
out these functions in its Board Charter, summarised above in the section titled “Summary of Board Charter”.
Recommendation 1.2: Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of senior executives.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012
corporAte GoVernAnce
stAtement
cONtINUED
PRINCIPLE 1: LAY SOLID FOUNDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT (CONTINUED)
Disclosure:
Refer to the section titled “Summary of Process for Performance Evaluation” above.
Recommendation 1.3: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 1.
Disclosure:
A summary of the Company’s Board Charter is noted above under the section titled “Summary of Board Charter” and
will also be made publicly available on the Company’s website at www.gres.com.au under the section marked
Corporate Governance.
66
The Company will from time to time conduct performance evaluations of its senior executives in accordance with the
Company’s Process for Performance Evaluation.
PRINCIPLE 2: STRUCTURE THE BOARD TO ADD VALUE
Recommendation 2.1: A majority of the board should be independent Directors.
Disclosure:
The Board has a majority of Directors who are independent.
The independent Directors of the Company are Peter Hood, Terrence Strapp and Barry Patterson (deemed independent).
The Board deems Barry Patterson to be an independent director notwithstanding his substantial shareholding in the
Company because he is not a member of management and is otherwise free of any business or other relationship
(including those referred to in Box 2.1 of the Principles & Recommendations and the Company’s Policy on Assessing the
Independence of Directors) that could materially interfere with, or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere
with, the independent exercise of his judgment. Furthermore, Barry Patterson’s interests as a major shareholder are
considered by the Board to be in line with the interests of all other shareholders.
The non independent Directors of the Company are Joseph Ricciardo and Tony Patrizi.
Recommendation 2.2: The Chair should be an independent Director.
Disclosure:
The independent Chair of the Board is Barry Patterson.
Recommendation 2.3: The roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer should not be exercised by the same individual.
Disclosure:
The Managing Director is Joe Ricciardo who is not currently Chair of the Board.
Recommendation 2.4: The Board should establish a Nomination Committee.
Disclosure:
The Board has established a Nomination Committee.
Recommendation 2.5: Companies should disclose the process for evaluating the performance of the Board, its
committees and individual Directors.
Disclosure:
Refer to the section titled “Summary of Process for Performance Evaluation” above.
Recommendation 2.6: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to Reporting on Principle 2.
Disclosure:
A profile of each Director containing their skills, experience, expertise and term of office is set out in the
Directors Report.
As noted above, the independent Directors of the Company are Peter Hood, Terrence Strapp and Barry Patterson
(deemed independent). These directors are independent as they are non executive Directors who are not members
of management and who are free of any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with, or could
reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with, the independent exercise of their judgement.
Independence is measured having regard to the relationships listed in Box 2.1 of the Principles & Recommendations and
the Company’s materiality thresholds.
To assist Directors with independent judgement, it is the Board’s policy that if a Director considers it necessary to obtain
independent professional advice to properly discharge the responsibility of their office as a Director then, provided the
Director first obtains approval for incurring such expense from the Chair, the Company will pay the reasonable expenses
associated with obtaining such advice.
The Board has established a Nomination Committee. Barry Patterson (chair), Peter Hood, Terrence Strapp and Joe
Ricciardo are members of the Nomination Committee. The Company’s Nomination Committee Charter is summarised
above in the section titled “Summary of Nomination Committee Charter.”
Performance evaluations of the Board, its Committees and the Directors will be conducted from time to time in
accordance with the Company’s Process for Performance Evaluation.
67
In determining candidates for the Board, the Nomination Committee (or equivalent) follows a prescribed
procedure summarised in the section titled “Summary of Policy and Procedure for Selection and (Re)Appointment
of Directors” above.
The Board recognises that Board renewal is critical to performance and the impact of Board tenure on succession
planning. Each director other than the Managing Director, must not hold office (without re-election) past the third annual
general meeting of the Company following the Director’s appointment or three years following that Director’s last election
or appointment (whichever is longer). However, a Director appointed to fill a casual vacancy or as an addition to the Board
must not hold office (without re-election) past the next annual general meeting of the Company. At each annual general
meeting a minimum of one director or a third or the total number of Directors must resign. A Director who retires at an
annual general meeting is eligible for re-election at that meeting. Re-appointment of Directors is not automatic.
PRINCIPLE 3: PROMOTE ETHICAL AND RESPONSIBLE DECISION-MAKING
Recommendation 3.1: Companies should establish a Code of Conduct and disclose the code or a summary of the
code as to the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the company’s integrity, the practices necessary to take
into account their legal obligations and the reasonable expectations of their stakeholders and the responsibility and
accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices.
Disclosure:
The Company has established a Code of Conduct as to the practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Company’s
integrity, practices necessary to take into account their legal obligations and the expectations of their stakeholders and
responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices. The Code of
Conduct is summarised above in the section titled “Summary of Code of Conduct”.
Recommendation 3.2: Companies should establish a policy concerning diversity and disclose the policy or a summary
of that policy. The policy should include requirements for the Board to establish measureable objectives for achieving
gender diversity for the Board to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them.
Disclosure:
A summary of the Company’s Diversity Policy is summarised above in the Section titled “Summary of Diversity Policy”.
Recommendation 3.3: Companies should disclose in each annual report the measureable objectives for achieving
gender diversity set by the Board in accordance with the diversity policy and progress towards achieving them.
Disclosure:
A summary of the Company’s Diversity Policy containing measureable objectives for achieving gender diversity is
summarised above in the section titled “Summary of Diversity Policy”.
Recommendation 3.4: Companies should disclose in each annual report the proportion of women employees in the
whole organisation, women in senior executive positions and women on the Board.
Disclosure:
A summary of the Company’s Diversity Policy disclosing the proportion of women employees in the organisation,
women in senior executive positions and women on the Board is summarised above in the section titled Summary of
Diversity Policy.
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012corporAte GoVernAnce
stAtement
cONtINUED
PRINCIPLE 3: PROMOTE ETHICAL AND RESPONSIBLE DECISION-MAKING (CONTINUED)
Recommendation 3.5: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principal 3.
Disclosure:
A summary of the Company’s Gender Diversity Policy is summarised above under the section “Summary of
Diversity Policy”.
PRINCIPLE 4: SAFEGUARD INTEGRITY IN FINANCIAL REPORTING
Recommendation 4.1: The Board should establish an Audit Committee.
68
Disclosure:
The Company has established an Audit Committee
Recommendation 4.2: The Audit Committee should be structured so that it:
• consists only of non-executive directors
• consists of a majority of independent directors
• is chaired by an independent Chair, who is not Chair of the Board
• has at least three members
Disclosure:
The Audit Committee comprises three directors, Terrence Strapp (Chair), Peter Hood and Barry Patterson all of whom are
independent non-executive Directors.
Recommendation 4.3: The Audit Committee should have a formal charter.
Disclosure:
The Company has adopted an Audit Committee Charter, which is summarised above in the section titled “Summary of
Audit Committee Charter”.
Recommendation 4.4: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 4.
Disclosure:
As noted above, the Company has established a separate Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is comprised of the
following members Terrence Strapp (chair), Peter Hood and Barry Patterson. The Company’s Audit Committee Charter is
summarised above in the section titled “Summary of Audit Committee Charter.”
Details of each of the Director’s qualifications are set out in the Directors Report.
The Company has established procedures for the selection, appointment and rotation of its external auditor. These are
summarised under the section titled “Summary of Procedure for the Selection, Appointment and Rotation of External
Auditor” above.
PRINCIPLE 5: MAKE TIMELY AND BALANCED DISCLOSURES
Recommendation 5.1: Companies should establish written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing
Rule disclosure requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance and disclose
those policies or a summary of those policies.
Disclosure:
The Company has established written policies designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure and
accountability at a senior executive level for that compliance. These are summarised under the section titled “Summary
of Compliance Procedures” above.
Recommendation 5.2: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 5.
Disclosure:
A summary of the Company’s policy to guide compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure is included above under the
section titled “Summary of Compliance Procedures.”
PRINCIPLE 6: RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
Recommendation 6.1: Companies should design a communications policy for promoting effective communication with
shareholders and encouraging their participation at general meetings and disclose their policy or a summary of that policy.
Disclosure:
The Company has designed a communications policy for promoting effective communication with shareholders and
encouraging shareholder participation at general meetings. This is summarised under the section titled “Summary of
Shareholder Communication Strategy” above.
Recommendation 6.2: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 6.
Disclosure:
69
A summary of the Company’s shareholder communication strategy is included above in the section titled “Summary of
Shareholder Communication Strategy.”
It is the Company’s policy to require the external auditor to attend its annual general meeting and be available to respond
to shareholder questions.
PRINCIPLE 7: RECOGNISE AND MANAGE RISK
Recommendation 7.1: Companies should establish policies for the oversight and management of material business
risks and disclose a summary of those policies.
Disclosure:
The Board has adopted a Risk Management Policy, which sets out the Company’s risk profile. This policy is summarised
under the section titled “Summary of Risk Management Policy” above.
Recommendation 7.2: The Board should require management to design and implement the risk management and
internal control system to manage the Company’s material business risks and report to it on whether those risks are
being managed effectively. The Board should disclose that management has reported to it as to the effectiveness of the
Company’s management of its material business risks.
Disclosure:
The Board has required management to design, implement and maintain risk management and internal controls systems
to manage the Company’s material business risks. The Board also requires management to report to in confirming that
those risks are being managed effectively.
Recommendation 7.3: The Board should disclose whether it has received assurance from the Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent) and the Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) that the declaration provided in accordance with section
295A of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system
is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
Disclosure:
The Board will require the Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent) and the Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent) to provide
a declaration to the Board in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act and to assure the Board that such
declaration is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control and that the system is operating
effectively in all material respects in relation to financial reporting risks.
Recommendation 7.4: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 7.
Disclosure:
0A summary of the Company’s Risk Management Policy is included above in the section titled “Summary of Risk
Management Policy.”
GR EnGinEERinG SERvicES LimitEd AnnUAL REPORt 2012corporAte GoVernAnce
stAtement
cONtINUED
PRINCIPLE 8: REMUNERATE FAIRLY AND RESPONSIBLY
Recommendation 8.1: The Board should establish a Remuneration Committee.
Notification of departure:
The Company has established a Remuneration Committee.
Recommendation 8.2: The Remuneration Committee should be structured so that it consists of a majority of
independent directors, is chaired by an independent chair and has at least three members.
Disclosure:
70
The Company has established a Nomination and Remuneration Committee. The Remuneration Committee is comprised
of Barry Patterson (Chair), Terrence Strapp, Peter Hood and Joe Ricciardo. Messrs Patterson, Strapp and Hood are
independent directors.
Recommendation 8.3: Companies should clearly distinguish the structure of non-executive Directors’ remuneration
from that of executive Directors and senior executives.
Disclosure:
Refer to the section titled “Summary of Remuneration Policy” above.
Recommendation 8.4: Companies should provide the information indicated in the Guide to reporting on Principle 8.
Disclosure:
As noted above, the Company has established a separate Remuneration Committee. The Remuneration Committee
is comprised of the following members Barry Patterson (Chair), Terrence Strapp, Peter Hood and Joe Ricciardo. The
Company’s Remuneration Committee Charter is summarised above in the section titled “Summary of Remuneration
Committee Charter.”
There are no termination or retirement benefits for non-executive Directors (other than for superannuation).
The Company’s Remuneration Committee Charter includes a statement of the Company’s policy on prohibiting
transactions in associated products which limit the risk of participating in unvested entitlements under any equity based
remuneration schemes.
AdditionAl AsX inFormAtion
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 11 October 2012:
• the twenty largest shareholders held 87.4% of the ordinary shares; and
• there were 1,167 ordinary shareholders
Distribution of securities
Analysis of number of equity security holders by size of holding:
Range
1 - 1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 100,000
100,001 - 1,000,000
1,000,001 - 9,999,999,999
Rounding
Total
total
74
423
285
339
30
16
Units
44,590
1,333,483
2,360,652
10,571,540
9,352,585
126,337,150
1,167
150,000,000
% shares issued
0.03
0.89
1.57
7.05
6.24
84.22
0.00
100.00
71
The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares is 38.
Equity security holders
Top 20 Shareholders as at 11 October 2012:
Name
Number of
shares held
% of shares
issued
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Mr David Joseph Sala Tenna + Ms Jane Frances Sala Tenna
Joley Pty Ltd
Polly Pty Ltd
Quintal Pty Ltd
Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd
Paksian Pty Ltd
Kingarth Pty Ltd
Mr Giuseppe Totaro
Ms Barbara Ann Woodhouse
Ms Beverley June Schier
National Nominees Limited
Ledgking Pty Ltd
Mr Stephen Paul Kendrick
JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
Sandhurst Trustees Ltd
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above