Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Biotechnology / Grainger

Grainger

gri · LSE Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker gri
Exchange LSE
Sector Healthcare
Industry Biotechnology
Employees 201-500
← All annual reports
FY2005 Annual Report · Grainger
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
graingertrustplc

annual report and accounts 2005

1 The opportunities

l 14 Highlights 2005 l 15 The results

l 16 Facts and figures

l 18 Chairman’s statement 

20 Chief executive’s statement
44 Board members
62 Independent auditors’ report
96 Shareholders’ information l 97 Advisers

l 25 Operating and financial review l 34 Corporate social responsibility report

l 46 Corporate governance report

l 52 Report of the remuneration committee l 59 Directors’ report 

l 64 Financial statements

l 70 Notes to the financial statements

l 95 Five-year record

l 98 Glossary of terms

l 100 Corporate addresses

1

theopportunities

A strong core business with attractive prospects for diversification

With over 12,000 homes, Grainger is the largest quoted

residential property owner in the UK. While acquiring,

managing and selling these properties is the mainstay of 

our business, we’re increasingly active in other areas such 

as equity release, regeneration, property development, 

asset management and housebuilding. We are also

expanding into residential development and investment 

in the newly enlarged EU. 

2

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Property trading

During the year our sales and acquisitions team

have sold 913 residential units and purchased

1,254 including the assets purchased through 
the City North acquisition.

buyingsellingletting

Managing our core business while expanding into new forms of ownership

Our core business is owning, managing and trading residential properties that are subject

to regulated tenancies. Under this arrangement, the tenant can stay in the property for life

and pays us below-market rent. We buy these properties at less than the vacant-possession

value to reflect the low yield and the fact that the tenant has lifetime rights of occupation.

When the tenant leaves, we can then sell the property into the owner-occupier market.

These properties therefore provide us with two sources of income – rents and trading

profits on sale. The size and geographic spread of the portfolio (some 8,000 units across

the UK) and the fact that properties are bought and sold over a long period of time help 

to protect us against the risks of home ownership – particularly short-term or localised 

falls in prices. 

Legislative changes in 1988 meant that no new regulated tenancies could be created 

after that date. As a result, the overall stock is falling. Although we make every effort to

replace the regulated properties that become vacant and are sold, the overall portfolio will

decline over time. We are using our existing management and trading skills to engage in

other areas of residential ownership such as equity release and market lets. Our market-let

portfolio also utilises our skills in refurbishment, lettings and targeted sales in order to

maintain performance and protect against the depreciation of the stock. 

m
4
8
9
£

T
P
A

D
N
A

D
E
T
A
L
U
G
E
R

m
8
8
1
£

S
E
I

C
N
A
N
E
T

D
E
R
U
S
S
A

m
6
9
1
£

S
N
O
I
S
R
E
V
E
R

E
M
O
H

m
0
8
£

*
R
E
H
T
O

m
9
5
£

T
N
A
C
A
V

Residential property
portfolio

* includes share of joint ventures

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
City North 

In April 2005 we completed the acquisition of

the AIM-listed company, City North Group plc

(‘CNG’), for £61m. CNG’s portfolio consists of

around 350 market-rented residential units worth

about £90m along with approximately £19m of

development assets. All its properties are in

Central London. The acquisition helped to lift 

the value of Grainger’s market-rented property 

to about £200m. This now has the critical mass

that offers opportunities to create a fund for

third-party investors which is now in the process

of being formed. 

Easton Neston 

In two separate purchases in April and

September 2005, we acquired a substantial part

of the Easton Neston Estate in Northamptonshire.

The total cost was around £10.25m and the

purchase provides a great mix of short and 

long-term opportunities for Grainger. The estate’s

17 cottages and traditional tenanted farm fit well

within our core business while the farm buildings

and vacant farmland offer excellent potential for

residential conversion. 

The Ancient Order of Forresters 

In January 2005 we bought a UK-wide 

portfolio of 241 houses and flats from The

Ancient Order of Forresters Friendly Society

(AOFFS) for £17m. A large proportion of these

units had been let to regulated tenants and

former employees and AOFFS was concerned 

to protect their interests while reinvesting in

commercial property with less management

responsibility. As the new owner, Grainger has

established a strategy that respects the needs 

of the long-term tenants. 

4

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Help at Hand

Help at Hand are a lifestyle management service who 

are able to assist with a variety of requests such as local

services, party planning or obtaining competitive utility
company quotes. We are now offering their services free 

of charge to our market-let tenants, particularly to help

them with the stresses of moving to a new property.

managingmaintainingrepairing

Responsive and responsible landlords of all types of residential property

Tenants Guide

One of Grainger’s strengths is the ability to manage property on a large scale. Operating

We have developed a

comprehensive Tenants

Guide that provides clear

and easy advice at each

stage of their tenancy. 

from six offices, our property management teams look after more than 12,000 homes

across the UK and they are trained to understand all types of property and tenure. 

Property management is a demanding role requiring complex daily decisions. It’s important

we fulfil our obligations as landlords and give excellent service to our customers while at

the same time protecting the value of our assets and enhancing the performance of our

portfolio. Our property management professionals are skilled at balancing these demands. 

In the past year we’ve launched a number of initiatives to improve the service to our

tenants. We’ve published a Tenants Guide, became a voluntary member of the Housing

5

Tenanted Residential

Regional investment 

value summary

F

A

a network of six offices 

A Altrincham

B Putney

C Harborne
D London

E Martlesham

F Newcastle upon Tyne

C

E

D

B

43%
22%
20%
15%

LONDON  £636m

OTHER SOUTH  £320m

MIDLANDS/EAST £299m

NORTH AND SCOTLAND  £218m

Ombudsman and teamed up with Help at Hand to offer an add-on service in lifestyle

Protecting our assets

management. We’re also promoting an energy efficiency scheme to help tenants to access

funding for central heating and cavity wall and loft insulation.

As well as managing our own property portfolio, we also offer our asset management

expertise to third-party partners. These include the Schroders ResPUT residential investment

fund and Grainger Geninvest LLP, a joint venture between Grainger and Genesis Housing

Group. In each case, we combine the skills of our property management and sales and

acquisitions teams to ensure the right strategy and targets for the portfolio and the right

blend of refurbishment, sales and new acquisitions to achieve the required performance. 

During the year we spent

over £13.5m on repairing

and maintaining our

portfolio. As well as

protecting the long-term

value of our assets, this

investment enhances our

reputation as landlords and

strengthens our case in

bidding for new portfolios. 

6

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Customer protection 

Both Bridgewater and Norwich Union are

members of Safe Home Income Plans (SHIP),

the industry body that has set the highest
standards for the equity release market.

These standards will be further enhanced 

by FSA regulation in 2007.

innovatingspecialisingprotecting

Developing a range of flexible retirement solutions

Home reversion plans are part of the wider equity release market and enable home owners

to raise cash from what is usually their most significant asset – their home. They also

provide Grainger with long-term exposure to the housing market. 

We were delighted to launch The Flexible Reversion Plan a market-leading product which

offers for the first time a flexible proposition to potential customers. Under a typical plan,

the home owner sells all or part of their property to Grainger in return for either a lump

sum or a series of payments. The amount we pay depends on the value of the property, 

the age of the home owner and the proportion of the home they wish to sell. The

householder can then stay in the property, rent free, for the rest of their life or until they

decide to leave. At that point, Grainger is able to sell the property and realise its profit.

7

Norwich Union

Under a recent agreement with Norwich Union,

Grainger pays Norwich Union a fee for selling its

home reversion product through its nationwide
sales and distribution network. Grainger then

acquires the assets of new home reversion

customers. It sets the pricing, acquires and

manages each property during its occupation,

disposes of the asset on vacancy and retains 

its relevant equity share of the proceeds. 

This exciting partnership links Grainger with 

the UK’s leading equity release provider and

offers attractive opportunities for growth in 

a potentially very large market.

Grainger acquires home reversion assets through three main sources – the purchase 

of existing portfolios or home reversion plans from third parties, through our own

Bridgewater brand and through our arrangement with Norwich Union.

Home reversion plans are particularly attractive to the elderly who can use the cash 

to supplement their pensions or to fund improvements in their lifestyle. We expect 

Bridgewater Equity Release

this market to grow considerably over the next few years.

Because there is no rental income while the householder is in occupation, home 

reversion is a long-term investment. It therefore makes a good strategic fit with 

the cashflows generated by the regulated tenancy business.

offers Independent

Financial Advisers an

innovative and flexible

reversion proposition,

making it a leading

provider of the product. 

8

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Building for growth

In the year, the development team brought

294 units to the market for sale, gained

planning permission on 438 units, with 
1,345 awaiting planning and approximately

1,750 further units for which planning

applications will be made.

buildingdevelopingregenerating

Using our housing skills in new and imaginative development schemes

Latitude, 

Clapham Common

Of the 77 residential units

for sale above this Tesco

store in Clapham, 67 were

reserved or exchanged by

the year end.

Grainger is keen to maintain its exposure to all sectors of the residential market. 

One way we do so is through our development and trading division whose interests 

range from strategic land development to house-building. 

The division seeks to create value through changes of use or density or through 

physical development. Its profits come from three main sources – land and regeneration,

residential development and our house-building subsidiary, Grainger Homes. 

Land and regeneration activities typically involve buying green or brownfield sites 

and, over time, obtaining planning permission for residential or mixed-use development. 

9

Smiths Dock

Grainger is involved in a joint venture with two other

parties to remediate this former dry docks site on the 

north bank of the River Tyne in North Shields. The

redevelopment site totals 30 acres and its final use 

will be a mixture of residential, retail and commercial.

Our major recent land projects have been at Basingstoke and in the north Northumberland

The Glasshouse, Putney

Coalfield regeneration area.

Residential development is biased towards the mixed use and London flat market, often

using our own assets or entering into partnerships with third parties. 

On the site of a former

office building that was 

held in our commercial

portfolio we are developing

Grainger Homes is a niche house builder operating mainly in the north east of England,

22 residential units of 

developing up to 200 units per annum. We are also using this division to develop assets 

for our market-rented investment fund.

which 14 were reserved or

exchanged by the year end.

10

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Our partnership with Schroders ResPUT

Fund is now in its fourth year. We have

increased our stake and are now due 
to take on additional responsibilities

including strategy and acquisitions.

expandinginvestingpartnering

Broadening our horizons through new ventures in the UK and abroad

As we expand, we’re seeking to replicate the main characteristics of our UK activities 

in mainland Europe. To this end, we’re looking for long-term exposure to the tenanted

residential market, especially in Germany, and for residential development opportunities

with particular focus on the new EU countries.

Broadening our horizons also involves collaboration with other parties to make best use 

of each other’s skills, assets or funding. In the year we have entered into joint ventures 

with local partners in Estonia and Prague for developing residential products. In the

tenanted residential market we run the former church commissioners’ portfolio as a joint

venture with Genesis Housing Group. In management, we provide asset and property

management services to the Schroders ResPUT fund in which we also have a 19.5%

investment. In equity release, our venture with Norwich Union provides a valuable source 

of home reversion contracts. In development, we work closely and successfully with local

authorities and communities, registered social landlords, landowners and other developers. 

current projects

Preussag 

In October 2005, Grainger agreed to acquire a

portfolio of about 1,400 residential units from

Preussag Immobilien GmbH for approximately
€71.5m (£48.9m). The properties are in the
Metro Ruhr area of Germany, mainly in the cities

of Recklinghausen, Hamm and Herne. Due to be

completed by 31 December 2005, the transaction

represents Grainger’s entry into the German

residential market and will provide a platform 

for further growth in Continental Europe.

Grainger Geninvest LLP 

In June 2005, Grainger and Genesis Housing

Group formed a 50/50 joint venture to acquire 

a portfolio of 455 residential units (including

about 200 regulated tenancies) and 16 shop

properties in Maida Vale, Waterloo and Stoke

Newington from the church commissioners. The

total consideration amounted to £70m. Grainger

and Genesis have worked closely together since

the acquisition with Grainger providing asset

management services and Genesis providing 

day-to-day property and tenant relationship

management. The transaction illustrates our

ability to work with other parties to make major

acquisitions in the regulated sector. 

Fund management 

The acquisition of City North Group plc in April

2005 boosted our portfolio of market-rented

residential properties. Now regrouped, this

portfolio, approaching £200m, provides an

opportunity to create a fund of predominantly

market-let properties and offer it to external

investors. Plans for the launch are well advanced.

The portfolio has a broad range of properties

with a stable income and opportunities for

reversionary uplift and asset value growth.

12

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Staff training

Investment in employee development is 

vital to our growth. In the last year, just 

over 75% of employees attended formal
training courses with 31 people studying 

for professional qualifications.

performingachievingdeveloping

Investing in our future by developing our people 

1

2

3

Senior appointments 

The group’s expansion has allowed us to make a number of senior appointments during

in the year:

1. Richard Exley

Director of Development 

2. Peter Couch

Director of Equity Release

3. Quinton Hill-Lines

Director of Corporate

Development 

the year. The result is deeper, broader management expertise from which the business 

will benefit as it develops.

In September 2005 we launched a competency framework to continue our work of

aligning employees’ needs to the overall objectives of the group. All staff now have 

an individually tailored development plan to help meet their own goals and aspirations 

and those of the organisation.

To ensure that our health and safety responsibilities are adequately resourced, we’ve now

appointed a group H&S Manager to maintain and improve our H&S standards and practices.

Having realised last year that our Epsom office could no longer cope with the demands 

of a growing business, we moved this year into new and modern office space in Putney. 

13

Embracing technology

We understand the benefits of using up-to-date

technology to improve communication with all 

of our stakeholders.

1

1. website

In 2005 we produced a new website that 

better reflects our business. It will soon

include a marketing tool for all our vacant

properties for sale or let.

2. intranet

A new group-wide intranet site is now 

central to our knowledge management 

and internal communication systems. 

It was developed jointly by employees 

and has changed the way we and our 

2

employees communicate.

3. e-learning

The Balancing Act is an e-learning programme 

that has been developed for our property

management team. It teaches them to think

strategically when facing difficult scenarios 

where decisions need to take into account 

issues such as profitability, reputation, 

customer service or legal obligations.

3

14

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

highlights2005

7
9
5
,
1

8
3
4
,
1

4
9
2
,
1

5
8
3

2
7
3

8
7
2

1
4
2

1
1

.

5

5
6
.
4

6
2
.
4 3
8
.
2

6
2
5

02

03

04

05

02

03

04

05

02

03

04

05

GROSS PROPERTY ASSETS  

NNNAV PER SHARE
(pence)  

DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
(pence)

15

theresults

Market value of property assets £1.6bn

Core business operating contribution up by 7.6% to £88.2m

Grainger NAV up by 2.5% to 492p per share

First acquisitions on Continental Europe announced

Sales and distribution agreement with Norwich Union finalised

£61m takeover of City North Group plc

Total dividend up to 5.11p per share, an increase of 10%

Portfolio continues to grow in asset value terms:

– Vacant possession value now £2.067bn
– Investment value now £1.507bn
– Reversionary surplus stands at £560m

16

factsfigures

Over the last five years our gross assets have increased from £0.4bn to £1.6bn

c
l
p
r
e
g
n
a
r
g

i

l

a
i
t
n
e
d
i
s
e
r
d
e
t
n
a
n
e
t

i

g
n
d
a
r
t
d
n
a
t
n
e
m
p
o
e
v
e
d

l

Total market value of property assets

Group operations

Performance criteria

£1,631m**

are defined by 

the following:

Total operating contribution*

£101m

Return on shareholders investment

25.6%

*profit on ordinary activities before interest and 
taxation and excluding group administrative expenses

**including share of joint ventures (£34m)

Bulk of income comes from trading activities and

realisation of reversionary surpluses, so alternatives 

to yield based valuation measures also presented.

Focus is therefore on net asset value, profit before 

tax and earnings per share.

Use of NAV, diluted NAV and Grainger NAV which 

takes account of long-term reversionary surplus 

in our core portfolios.

At individual project level, performance criteria 

such as cash generation, internal rate of return,

profitability and strategic positioning used.

Market value of property assets by division

Within this division,

Trading

£1,507m**

Proportion of group operating contribution

contributions come

from two areas 

of operation:

87%

Operating contribution by division

£88.2m

Number of properties by division

12,382

**including share of joint ventures (£34m)

Regulated (Investment value: £984m) key features:

– Tenant has security of tenure

– Rents set by rent officer and increases capped 

at retail price index +5% over two years

– Purchased at discount to vacant possession 

value and sold on vacancy

–  Approximately 9% of the portfolio becomes 

vacant every year

– No new regulated tenancies being created

Characteristics: Low rental yield, high margin on sales.

Market value of property assets by division

Within this division,

Land and regeneration

contributions come

from three areas 

of operation:

£124m

Proportion of group operating contribution

13%

Operating contribution by division

£12.8m

Key features:

– Translates green and brownfield sites into residential 

or mixed use developments

– Complex long-term business that can be highly profitable

– Involves negotiations with planners, local communities

and councils

Major sites:

Kennel Farm, Basingstoke; West Waterlooville,

Hampshire; Widdrington/Hadston, Northumberland.

 
Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

17

Risk review

Business review

Major risk relates to state of housing market, linked to interest 

All activities characterised by cash generation, high trading 

rates and general economic environment. Risk minimised by:

margins and willingness to take long-term view.

– Portfolio is geographically widespread, reduces cluster risk

Regulated tenancy market diminishing, but we maintain 

– Portfolio spread across property types and values, reducing 

position by active purchasing.

exposure to highly fluctuating top-end properties

Review new and expanding business opportunities – 

– Relatively low average value where demand is consistent and strong

– Regulated properties are un-modernised on vacancy so demand 

tends to be high

Long-term view taken and financial stability enables short-term 

price fluctuations to be withstood.

home reversions, European investment, development 

and trading, asset and property management.

At plc level, key criteria is total shareholder return.

Home reversions (Investment 

value: £196m) key features:

– Tenant has security of tenure

– No rental income

Assured, vacant and others 

(Investment value: £327m) 

key features:

Rental and management

Net rental income Key features:

– Net rental income derived from regulated 

and assured tenancies after maintenance 

– Market-rented tenancies (£188m)

and management expenditure

– Whole or partial ownership purchased 

– Vacants generally for sale (£59m)

Asset and management fees Key features:

at discount to vacant possession

– Other, including ground rents, 

– Fee based activities remunerated by asset 

– Property sold on vacancy

– No maintenance obligation

Characteristics: No rental yield, 

high sales margin.

serviced apartments and share 

and property management fees

of joint ventures (£80m)

Characteristics: Management skills adapted 

Characteristics: Market yield, 

to provide additional fee income with no 

some margin on sale.

capital investment.

Residential development

Key features:

Grainger Homes

Key features:

– Uses group’s asset base, expertise or equity type funding

– Small scale niche house-building mostly in North East 

– Often in partnerships with housing associations, local 

of England

developers, occupiers and councils

– Produces consistent levels of cash and trading margins

Major sites:

Major sites:

South London Hospital, Clapham; Macaulay Road, Clapham; 

The Kylins, Morpeth; Grangewood, Widdrington.

Hornsey Road/Barnsbury, Islington; Smith Docks, North Shields.

18

Robert Dickinson 

Chairman

chairman’sstatement

I am pleased to report another year of significant progress

at Grainger Trust. Whilst we have not benefited from the

Since the year end we have exchanged on a €71.5m
residential investment portfolio in Germany comprising

exceptional market growth that has characterised more

recent results, we have concentrated on consolidating our

position as the UK’s leading quoted residential investor and

more than 1,400 units and generating annual income of
€4.5m. This acquisition will mark our first key investment
purchase within continental Europe and we continue to

trader and have worked to meet the strategic objectives 

look for further similar acquisitions where we can bring our

we set ourselves 12 months ago.

deep and extensive knowledge of the sector to generate

Our focus remains on Grainger’s core business – the

superior returns for shareholders.

acquisition, management and sale on vacancy, of

Shareholders will also be aware that we entered into

residential regulated tenancies. This business provides 

preliminary discussions with Parkdean Holidays to acquire

us with a unique set of skills, asset base, cash flow and

its entire issued share capital. Although these discussions

market knowledge that allows us to examine residential-

were terminated, they demonstrate our willingness to

based opportunities that have similar management

examine a wide range of less obvious opportunities where

challenges or return characteristics.

we believe we can bring our residential and development

During the year under review we have launched our 

skills to deliver long-term reversionary returns.

equity release joint venture programme with Norwich

Results

Union, expanded into Europe for the first time with two

Sales of tenanted residential property and net rental

joint venture developments, acquired a substantial land

income from our core portfolio continue to be the group’s

bank in Hampshire, and commenced work on several

main profit drivers. Operating contributions from our core

mixed-use urban developments. 

business, increased by 7.6% over the year to £88.2m from

In addition, we concluded a £61.3m agreed takeover of the

central London-based market-rented residential investment

company City North Group plc and a £70m joint venture

acquisition of a tenanted residential portfolio with Genesis

Housing Group, one of the country’s leading Registered Social

Landlords. We also disposed of our last remaining major

commercial property investments through an asset swap.

£81.9m. This included a contribution of £2.4m from City

North. At the pre-tax level, results for the 12 months to 

30 September 2005 were impacted by both a more normal

contribution from our development and trading division of

£12.8m compared with £25.3m we recorded last year and

higher interest charges of £49.5m against a pre-exceptional

item charge in 2004 of £40.1m, resulting from our

successful acquisition programme over the period.

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

19

Accordingly, pre-exceptional profits before tax were lower,

At the same time we will continue to generate income

but in line with expectations at £42.1m compared with

through our asset and property management skills, particularly

£59.6m for the same period a year ago. I am also pleased

when these can be used to help third party investors maximise

to report that Grainger’s net asset value continues to rise

their returns from the residential market. Also we aim to

despite the general perception of the residential market. 

As shareholders appreciate, we consider the group’s net

asset position in three ways: net asset value per share

take full advantage of any market opportunities that may
arise where our strong financial base, long-term outlook

and experience will enable us to unlock value.

(‘NAV’), diluted net asset value per share (‘NNNAV’), which

We are pleased that the Chancellor has committed to

takes into account contingent tax and the market value of

introducing UK REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts) in 

long-term debt and hedging, and the Grainger NAV, which

the 2006 Financial Bill. We now hope that the eventual

adjusts for the reversionary surplus within our portfolio.

legislation is not overly restrictive and that it will encourage

Our NAV has grown 2.0% to 558p from 547p, NNNAV 

real new investment to the Residential Sector.

has risen 3.5% to 385p from 372p, and the Grainger 

Board

NAV is up 2.5% to 492p from 480p.

During the course of the year under review Bill Tudor John,

In line with the guidelines we established last year the

former senior partner at Allen & Overy and currently a

Board is recommending a final dividend of 3.41p per share

managing director of Lehman Brothers, joined the board

which, together with the interim payment of 1.7p per

and has taken over the chairmanship of the Remuneration

share, will make a total for the year of 5.11p per share, 

Committee from Robert Hiscox.

an increase of 10%. If approved, the final dividend will be

paid on 8 March 2006 to the shareholders on the register

on 17 February 2006.

Strategy 

People

As Grainger expands, it is essential we have the right level

of skills and expertise to manage this growth. Although

much of this comes from our core of committed and

Long-term exposure to the residential investment market

dedicated professional senior executives, in the year we

has delivered annual compound growth rates (as measured

have been able to augment this with a number of external

by the Halifax House Price Index) of 7%, 10.5% and 14.2%

high level appointments. It is pleasing that Grainger is able

over the last 20, 10 and 5 years. There has been a more

to attract such highly qualified executives.

recent slow down in growth – house prices rose by 3% over

Outlook

the 12 months to the end of September 2005 – and the

outlook over the coming 12 months is somewhat uncertain.

The way forward is clear. We will focus on our core regulated

business but, recognising that this stock is finite, we will

Despite contradictory views of the market our own

continue to develop into areas that capitalise on our existing

experience is that sales in the first two months of the

skills and economic base and which offer exposure to the

current financial year have been marginally ahead of the

residential market. The most significant of these will be

end of September 2005 vacant possession values. We

equity release, investment in Europe, residential development

believe that over the course of the current financial year

and residential fund and property management.

overall house price inflation within our portfolio will 

be muted. 

Bearing these objectives in mind, together with our solid

financial platform and our asset and skills base, we believe

However our business model is based on long-term

we have the framework for continued long-term success.

investment returns rather than short term gains. Our interests

are focused on market sectors where reversionary potential

is not entirely dependant on short term market growth, but

also on gains secured through tenure or use changes and
by gaining planning consent. These opportunities exist both

Robert Dickinson Chairman

in the UK and within continental Europe.

20 December 2005

20

Rupert Dickinson 

Chief executive

focusingengagingprogressing

Chief executive’s statement

Last year we set out our objectives for Grainger Trust in our

key business areas and we have made significant progress 

in all of these.

Tenanted Residential This is our core business, providing us with a long-term exposure 

to the residential market and good levels of profit and cash generation. It is based on 

our large and diverse portfolio – at 30 September 2005 its market value amounted to 

£1.5bn an increase of 10.8% in the year – and our experience and expertise at managing

00

01

02

03

04

05

and trading property and our solid financial underpinning. 

Despite sluggish market conditions throughout the last year this division has continued 

to trade well, generating sales of £133m, only marginally down on 2004’s figure of

£135m. It has been pleasing that we have achieved these levels without significantly

reducing prices on sale. Margins on normal sales in 2005 (i.e when a property is sold 

on vacancy) were 48.5%; the equivalent figure in 2004 was 48.6%.

GRAINGER TRUST
FTSE REAL ESTATE
FTSE 250 INDEX

Share price performance
2000 – 2005

In valuation terms, our portfolio has risen in value by 2.6% and the average vacant

possession value of our properties at 30 September 2005 stood at £173,000.The

reversionary surplus in our portfolio (including our share of joint ventures) is £560m 

(2004: £536m) or 433p per share. 

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

21

This figure represents the difference between what we expect to sell our properties on

vacancy for and what we value them at in our market value balance sheet. The difference

between the vacant possession value of our residential portfolio and its original cost 

is £967m (2004: £928m).

Just as important as annual trading performance and

valuation uplifts is our ability to replenish stock levels and 

to grow businesses offering long-term growth potential. 

In our regulated business we have acquired 480 properties for £51m. We have also

purchased a highly reversionary portfolio of 455 London flats for £70m from the Church

Commissioners in a joint venture with the Genesis Housing Group. We are delighted to

have been successful in acquiring this portfolio as well as to be working with Genesis 

and their property management subsidiary Pathmeads. We see an interesting future for

Grainger in working more closely with the Housing Association Sector. 

As has been announced previously we entered into an agreement with Norwich Union

enabling our home reversion products to be sold through their own in-house advisors and

IFA distribution network. Sales through this channel have been slower than anticipated

when we announced the initiative in March. This reflects general market conditions in 

the equity release market and a slower than expected start up, although recent figures 

for our originations and the home reversion sector in general are more encouraging. 

We are building our home reversion portfolio using three routes (Bridgewater, Norwich

Union and portfolio acquisitions) and we anticipate being able to increase the total

portfolio by at least £50m in the year ahead. As part of this strategy, we have recently

launched our own Bridgewater Flexible Reversion Plan, and this has been well received 

by the market. 

We are pleased with the progress we have made in 

our market-rented and asset and property management

businesses. We believe that the key is to ally a good

portfolio with excellent property and asset management

skills and appropriate financing. 

0
0
0

,

4
4
1
£

3
0
0
2

0
0
0

,

4
6
1
£

4
0
0
2

0
0
0

,

3
7
1
£

5
0
0
2

average sale value of

Grainger’s properties 

on vacant possession

m
4
8
4
£

3
0
0
2

m
6
3
5
£

4
0
0
2

m
0
6
5
£

5
0
0
2

reversionary surplus

(the difference between

vacant possession value

and investment value)

 
 
 
 
 
 
22

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Chief executive’s statement continued

the acquisition of City

The acquisition of City North Group plc combined with our existing holdings has provided

North gives us close to

£200m

market-rented properties

us with a critical mass of market-rented properties – close to £200m as at 30 September

2005. We are now well advanced in preparing a fund structure to attract third party equity

into this portfolio. This will enable us to benefit from the rent and reversionary potential in

market-rented housing directly as one of the fund participants and indirectly through the

receipt of management and performance fees. 

Our management expertise is illustrated by the fact that we currently manage our own

portfolio of 12,382 properties and a further 1,185 properties for other residential investors.

These include Schroders Residential Property Unit Trust (ResPUT) where we have increased

our stake and are due to take on further responsibilities including strategy and acquisitions

in addition to our asset and property management roles. 

Grainger Europe Our objective in mainland Europe has been to replicate certain key

aspects of the Grainger UK business. Consequently we have been reviewing opportunities

in reversionary residential portfolios and development. 

Shortly after the year end we announced our first portfolio

acquisition – a total of 1,400 properties in the Metro Ruhr 
of Germany for a consideration of €71.5m (£48.9m). This

transaction is due to complete by the end of 2005. 

The combination of relatively high rental yields, low borrowing costs and potential for

significant gain over time, if the properties are sold to the owner occupier sector, make this

an attractive area for us. We are optimistic that this first acquisition will provide a good

platform for us to build on. 

During the year, we also announced our participation in two development opportunities.

Firstly, an 81.6% stake in a mixed residential/retail scheme in Zizkov in Prague, representing
an investment of €6.7m (£4.6m) and which we hope to take through the planning process
over the next 18 months. Secondly a €2.6m (£1.8m) investment representing a 45.7%

stake in an 800 unit proposed residential development in Tallinn, Estonia. 

Development and Trading Over the last few years we have moved away from pure

commercial investment and this process was substantially completed in the year. 

We are now focussed on three areas: residential development, primarily mixed use and

residential schemes in London and the South East, urban and rural regeneration schemes,

we currently manage 
our own portfolio of 

12,382

properties

and a further 

1,185

properties
for other residential 
investors

23

including the acquisition of strategic land with development potential, and Grainger

Homes, our housebuilding arm based largely in the North East of England.

After the exceptional year ended 2004, when several major

schemes came to fruition, the division this year has moved 

to a more normal level of trading, producing an operating

contribution of £12.8m on an asset base at the beginning 

Latitude, 
Clapham Common
have already had

67 units
reserved

from the 77 unit
development

of the period of £109m.

The development of the former South London Hospital in Clapham comprising 77 units 

has gone well with 67 reserved or exchanged for a value of £20.3m. In April we acquired

520 acres of land at West Waterlooville, Hampshire, which were previously held under

option. This has been included in the West of Waterlooville Major Development Area 

and provisionally allocated 1,550 residential units with a further 1,000 in reserve. 

A key element of our progress has been our ability 

and willingness to work with partners. 

At Smiths Dock in North Tyneside we have formed a joint venture with two local landowners

to regenerate some 30 acres of waterfront land. We have submitted an application for

detailed planning permission for 1,250 units. We have made progress on our schemes with

Islington Borough Council having now obtained planning consent for our 208 unit scheme

at Hornsey Road and the 141 unit scheme in Barnsbury.

Grainger Homes has continued to develop, completing the sale of 84 units in the year for 

a total of £11.3m, producing a trading contribution of £3.3m.

Operationally, therefore, we are pleased with the group’s performance in a year in which

market conditions have, as expected, proved testing. 

Grainger Homes has
produced a trading
contribution of

£3.3m

People As this group continues to grow and operate in new market areas it is very

important to ensure that we have the personnel and management structure in place to

maximise the potential of both our existing asset base and new opportunities. This year has

been one of continued growth and change and we have made three senior appointments

Peter Couch, as director of our Equity Release business, Quinton Hill-Lines as director of

Corporate Development and, most recently, Richard Exley who has joined as director of

Development and who is charged with moving forward this division. 

24

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

In addition we have recently introduced a new Senior Management Structure to ensure

that each part of our business is run in accordance with our stated strategy and that 

we take full advantage of the vast range of knowledge and skills we have within 

the organisation.

Outlook We remain very confident in the outlook for Grainger. Our core portfolio is

geographically widespread, with a typical value near or below the UK average and is

generally unmodernised. These features help sustain demand in times of market fragility. 

As importantly, the reversionary surplus in the portfolio of over half a billion pounds acts 

as a potential reservoir for future gains. We will focus on reversionary property for our 

core portfolio and continue to grow our property and asset management skills so that we

can make them more widely available to external investors in the market-rented sector.

We have put in place the products, distribution network 

and funding capability to support high levels of growth 

in the home reversion market. 

Uncertainty concerning the adequacy of pension provision and the widespread view that

house price inflation will be lower in the future should provide the impetus for increased

demand. Home reversion products fit well with other related sectors of the market, for

example second homes and retirement living and these may present further opportunities

for growth. 

We look forward to completing our first German acquisition and are reviewing several

other opportunities that should help our European operation to become a meaningful 

part of the group’s business. 

We have continued to invest in the development division and have several schemes in the

pipeline that will produce attractive returns in the short to medium term. We are growing

this division and are confident that we can use our understanding of local housing markets

and management to ensure attractive returns to our shareholders from a wide range of

developments in the residential sector.

In the coming year we will continue to progress in these main areas, whilst exploring new

opportunities to exploit our skills and asset base. I am confident that the team we have is

well placed to continue at the forefront of residential investment and development in this

country and in Europe. We are continuously challenged by new legislation and regulations

Rupert Dickinson
Chief executive

20 December 2005

but we will look at these as opportunities rather than threats.

25

Andrew Cunningham

Deputy chief executive 

and finance director

committingprofitinggrowing

Operating and financial review

The core tenanted residential 

Operating review

business has performed well with 

an improvement in operating

Tenanted residential highlights

– Operating contribution* increased by 7.6% 

contribution of some 8%. The

to £88.2m

development and trading division 

– 913 properties sold for £133m, generating 

a rise in trading profits and profit on disposal 

has not benefited from the large 

of fixed assets to £61m

one-off sales last year and has 

– 1,254 residential units purchased for £184m

returned to more normal levels 

of profitability.

– Year end portfolio of 12,382 units, investment 

value £1,507m**, vacant possession value £2,067m**

* Profit on ordinary activities before interest and taxation 

and excluding group administrative expenses.

** Including share of joint ventures.

26

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Operating review continued

Tenanted residential

Key performance statistics

Properties sold on vacancy 
Properties sold with tenants in occupation 

Total sales

Profits on sale*
Release of negative goodwill on sales

Net rental income and other income
Direct overhead costs

Trading contribution 

* including gains on the sale of fixed assets

No.

720
193

913

2005

2004

No.

783
248

1,031

£m

109
24

133

61
6

67

23
(2)

88

£m

111
24

135

58
6

64

20
(2)

82

Trading and rental performance has held up well in the year.

Although the sales process has been more sluggish this

The acquisition of City North Group plc contributed £2.4m 

year, as reflected by the number of vacant properties at 

to the years result. The overall return, which includes the net

the year end (423 compared to 356 last year) we have 

valuation uplift, has been depressed in comparison to last

still experienced good levels of demand, helped by the

year by the slowing down in house price inflation. In 2005

geographic spread and typical low value of individual 

the percentage valuation uplift in our portfolio was 2.6%, in

units. Approximately 59% of our properties by value are 

2004 it was 12.4%. After taking account of the elimination

in London and the South East, 26% in the Midlands, 

of revaluation surpluses realised on sales the valuation

East, South West and Wales and 15% in the North and

movement in the year was £15.8m (2004: £121.3m).

Scotland. Less than 22% of our properties by value have

Geographic distribution of residential portfolio 

Investment value 
£m

% of 
assets 

London

South East

South West

East

East Midlands

West Midlands

Wales

Yorkshire

North West

North East
Scotland

Share of joint ventures

43

16

6

6

4

9

1

4

9

1
1

100

636

237

83

94

61

134

11

56

127

23
11

1,473
34

1,507

vacant possession values in excess of £250,000 – the 

level at which demand volatility becomes more marked. 

Analysis of residential sales in the year 

(from stock and fixed assets)

Regulated

Assured

Vacant 

Equity Release 
Other

Total

Trading 
Sales profit/profit
on disposal
£m

proceeds
£m

86

11

24

7
5

133

43

2

9

4
3

61

No.

600

99

145

69
–

913

27

The average vacant possession values 

the investment value is £1,507m giving us a reversionary

in our three key portfolios are:

Regulated

Market rented

Home reversion 

Overall (excluding other interests)

£K

165

191

190

173

surplus of £560m. This is the gain over and above the

market value of the properties we would achieve if we 

sold the properties on vacancy at today’s values. The

surplus above original cost is £967m.

We have acquired a total of 1,254 units in the year for a

cost of £184m (including properties acquired in the City

North portfolio). 

This compares to the Halifax All House figure at 

Analysis of acquisitions in the year 

30 September 2005 of £166,000.

Range of vacant possession values 

(excluding other interests and share of joint ventures)

>£500k

£250k – £500k

£175k – £250k

£100k – £175k

<£100k

No. of 
properties

Vacant
possession
value £m

71

1,167

2,809

4,943

3,392

56

385

587

698

257

12,382

1,983

We have continued to grow our portfolio in both number

and asset value terms. The vacant possession value

(including our share of joint ventures) is £2,067m and 

Analysis of tenanted residential portfolio by tenure 

(excluding joint ventures but including City North)

Regulated (including APT)

Assured

Vacant

Equity Release

Other 

No.

480

584

30

156

4

1,254

Cost
£m

51

110

4

18

1

184

Vacant
possession
value £m

73

125

5

36

3

242

During the year we increased our stake in the Schroders

Residential Property Unit Trust (‘ResPUT’) to 19.5%. We

provide asset and property management services to this

fund and the fee income that we received from this and

from other similar services for other customers amounted

to £1.1m. 

Regulated

Assured

Vacant

Equity Release

Hotel complex – short term lettings

Other interests
Share of joint ventures

30 September 2005

30 September 2004

No. of
properties

Vacant
possession
value £m

Investment % of vacant
possession
value

value
£m

8,161

1,102

423

2,663

33

–
–

1,349

210

65

354

5

41
43

984

188

59

196

5

41
34

12,382

12,041

2,067

1,865

1,507

1,329

73

90

90

55

100

100
79

73

71

28

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Operating review continued

Development and trading highlights

– Acquisition of 520 acres of land at West Waterlooville

The results for 2004 included profits achieved on sales of

the commercial portfolio, of the last major housing allocated

land site at Kennel Farm and receipts relating to the Pimlico

– Continued rationalisation of commercial properties

development, totalling £22.1m. These were largely one-off

– Sales of 84 units worth £11.3m by Grainger Homes, 

Development and trading 

Key performance statistics 

Trading profits 

Profits on sale of fixed assets

Net rental income less overheads

Other income (2004 Pimlico flats) 

Trading contribution*

2005
£m

11.7

0.5

–

0.6

12.8

2004 
£m

13.5

3.5

0.4

7.9

25.3

* Profit on ordinary activities before interest and taxation 

and excluding group administrative expenses.

transactions and the division has now moved to more
normal trading levels. 

The movement on revaluation in the year was a deficit of

£12.0m (2004: deficit of £3.8m); this represents the net effect

of the elimination of revaluation surpluses realised on sales

in the year together with the impact of year end valuations.

Major contributions to trading profits in the year have

come from Kennel Farm (£3.5m) Grainger Homes (£3.3m)

and the sale of Landmark Place, Slough (£2.3m).

Opportunities for future income from Kennel Farm relate

primarily to approximately five acres of land currently

allocated for business use and the local centre. 

During the year Grainger Homes sold 84 units for £11.3m.

Much effort has gone into creating a sustainable land 

bank at this division and over the next three years we 

hope to achieve average annual sales of up to 200 units.

Other projects in this division are making satisfactory

progress and their status is shown in the table below.

Major development projects 

Project

Description

Status

Income 
expected from

West Waterlooville

520 acres of greenfield

Planning application for 1,550 units 

2008

Macaulay Road,
Clapham, SW4

South London 
Hospital, SW4

land in Hampshire

due to be submitted in 2006

110,000 sq. ft. mixed use
scheme in Clapham

Planning decision expected 
by mid 2006

77 residential units above 
Tesco store in Clapham

Completion of project due 
by Spring 2006

2008/9

2006

Hornsey Road, Barnsbury 

Public/private partnership 

Planning consent granted 

2008/9

Complex, Islington 

mixed use scheme, 

in October 2005

350 residential units, 

43,000 sq.ft. Council 
office and community use

Smiths Dock, 
North Shields

Joint venture to regenerate
30 acres at former dry docks 

Planning decision for 1,250 units
due early 2006

2007

29

Financial review 

Highlights

– Grainger NAV up 2.5% to 492p per share

– Loan to value ratio 54% (2004: 49%) 

– Refinancing in the year to give increased 

capacity and greater flexibility

Results

Group profit before interest and tax has fallen from

£99.7m to £91.6m. Net residential rents and other income

have increased by £3.5m to £23.2m, including £2.4m from

Major items affecting the tax charge are:

Group profit before tax

Tax at 30%

Adjusted for:

Additional tax on the difference between 

book and tax base costs of trading property sales

Negative goodwill (not taxable)

Other including adjustments to tax 
in prior periods

City North Group plc, and trading profits on residential

Actual tax charge

£m

42.1

12.6

7.4

(1.8)

(2.6)

15.6

sales including negative goodwill released and profits on

sale of fixed assets have improved by 4.3% from £64.4m

to £67.1m. However, these have been more than offset by 

a decrease in the contribution from the development and

trading division which fell from £25.3m to £12.8m. 

Interest payable 

Group pre-exceptional interest has increased from £40.1m

to £49.1m. This is a combination of higher average debt

levels (up by approximately £100m over the previous year)

and higher borrowing costs. The average base rate in 2005

was 4.7% in 2004, 4.1%. This impacted on the proportion

of our debt that is variable or is hedged through caps. Our

average interest rate in the year was 5.9% (2004: 5.8%).

Interest is covered 1.9 times by profit before interest and

tax (2004: 2.5 times). Net cash flow (being all group

receipts less expenses and taxation) covered interest 

3.8 times (2004: 5.1 times).

Taxation 

Our annual tax charge is significantly affected by FRS19,

the accounting standard preventing the provision of

deferred tax on revaluation gains when companies are

acquired. This serves to increase our effective tax rate

above the standard corporation tax rate of 30%. 

This year, it has been 37.1% (2004: 39.1%). 

Earnings per share and dividends

Earnings per share before exceptional items have fallen to

21.2p from 29.9p. Dividends have increased by 10% and

are covered 4.0 times by profit after taxation but before

exceptional items (2004: 6.5 times).

Financial position 

General 

Most of our properties are held as trading stock and are

therefore shown in the statutory balance sheet at cost. 

This does not reflect the true worth of Grainger’s assets

and therefore we set out in this statement a summary of 

our net assets with the properties restated to market value. 

Fixed assets 

Fixed assets properties in the balance sheet comprise

£202.2m tenanted residential and £20.3m development

totalling £222.5m (2004: £97.0m, £8.4m and £105.4m

respectively). The major change relates to the acquisition 

of the City North portfolio in the year. 

30

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Financial review continued

Market value analysis of property assets

Residential

Development and trading

Total

Held 
as stock 
at cost
£m

Market
value
adjustment
£m

870

92

962

401

12

413

Market
value 
£m

1,271

104

1,375

Fixed 
assets at
valuation
£m

202

20

222

Total
£m

1,473

124

1,597

Investments and intangible assets

The cost of our tenanted residential stock has increased

Investments relate to our investment in Schroders ResPUT

from £843m to £870m, being stock purchases of £85m,

and in joint ventures and associates. We invested a further

capitalised improvement costs of £6m less sales and

£8.4m in the ResPUT this year and now own 19.5% of the

transfers of £64m. Market value figures have risen to

units issued. The market value at 30 September 2005 was

£1,271m from £1,232m. Valuation uplifts account for £48m

£18.2m and the cost £15.4m.

Our main joint venture interests are a 331⁄3% stake in a
limited liability partnership to develop Smiths Dock in North

and this is reduced by the elimination on sale of previously

recognised surpluses of £36m. The balance of £27m relates

to the net effect of sales, acquisitions and transfers. 

Tyneside of £4.1m including goodwill (2004: £3.3m), a

The market value of all our tenanted residential property 

50% stake in a similar structure with Genesis Housing

at 30 September 2005 is £1,473m (2004: £1,329m).

Group of £8.8m which was established to acquire a

portfolio of properties from the Church Commissioners

which had a year end value of £72.6m and a 50% stake 

in a joint venture with Grange (Prescot Street) Limited to

develop land at Prescot Street, London, E1 with a value 

of £5m.

The group’s development and trading assets held as stock

increased in cost terms to £92m and in market terms to

£104m (2004: £76m and £101m respectively), the major

movements being expenditure on West Waterlooville

amounting to £21.5m, net investment at Grainger Homes

of £11.4m, and the sale of Landmark Place, Slough which

The negative intangible asset of £81.3m (2004: £84.8m)

eliminated £20.0m of cost. 

principally reflects goodwill arising on the acquisition of

Bromley, the acquisition vehicle used to acquire the BPT

group. It is being released to the profit and loss account 

in line with property sales from that business.

Trading properties 

The total market value of all of the group’s development

and trading assets at 30 September 2005 was £123.8m

(2004: £109.0m)

Statutory balance sheet 

Tenanted residential 

Development and trading

Market value balance sheet

Tenanted residential 
Development and trading 

30 Sept 
2005
£m

30 Sept
2004
£m

870

92

962

1,271
104

1,375

843

76

919

1,232
101

1,333

31

Market
value
balance
sheet 
£m

1,473

124

1,597

95
–

1,692

(922)

(39)

(7)
(2)

(970)

722

558

FRS13
£m

Contingent
tax
£m

–

–

–

–
–

–

(18)

–

7
–

(11)

(11)

(8)

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

(213)
–

(213)

(213)

(165)

NNNAV
balance
sheet
£m

1,473

124

1,597

95
–

1,692

(940)

(39)

(213)
(2)

(1,194)

498

385

Statutory 
balance 

Market
value
sheet adjustments
£m

£m

1,072

112

1,184

87
(80)

1,191

(922)

(39)

(6)
–

(967)

224

173

401

12

413

8
80

501

–

–

(1)
(2)

(3)

498

385

Pro forma net assets

Properties:

Tenanted residential 

Development and trading

Total properties

Investment/others assets/cash
Negative goodwill

Total assets

Borrowings and creditors

Net current liabilities

Provisions/contingent tax
Minority interest

Total liabilities

Net assets 30 September 2005

Net assets pence per share

Other assets and liabilities 

Other net liabilities excluding cash balances and current

purchase price for Deutsche Bank’s stake in the Bromley

debt instalments have fallen from £77.0m to £45.4m. Two

joint venture (£10.0m) – both of these were included in

major items contribute to this. Firstly the acquisition of a

creditors in the September 2004 balance sheet and were

major portfolio of equity release properties (£19.5m) and

paid shortly thereafter.

secondly the payment of the final instalment of the

Net assets 

Net assets at market value have increased from £678m to £722m:

Net assets at 1 October 2004

Retained profits

Revaluation surpluses:

Tenanted residential 

Development and trading 

Investments

Goodwill movements

Shares issued on acquisition of City North Group plc 

Net assets at 30 September 2005

Reflected in
the accounts
£m

Not reflected
in the accounts
£m

178

20

5

1

–

–

20

224

500

(6)

12

(13)

4

1

–

498

Total
£m

678

14

17

(12)

4

1

20

722

32

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Financial review continued

Diluted NAV (or NNNAV) is computed by adjusting NAV 

The total of our net borrowings expressed as a percentage

for the market value of long-term debt and derivatives 

of the market value of our gross property assets (‘loan to

and for contingent tax.

value ratio’) at 30 September 2005 was 54% (2004: 49%)

These two adjustments amount to 8p and 165p per share

respectively (2004: 0p and 174p respectively).

The FRS13 adjustment has increased because of the 

current low five-year swap rate. At 30 September 2005 

this was 4.535%, compared to 5.122% in 2004. This 

has resulted in some of our hedging instruments moving

out of the money. 

and gearing was 120% (2004: 103%).

Financing
During the year the group extended its core borrowing

facility by £400m to £1,300m and in so doing reduced 

the blended margin on the facility by seven basis points. 

At 30 September 2005, the group had headroom in 

its borrowing capacity of £450m.

Contingent tax, which will only crystallise on the realisation

Capital Management

of the assets and is therefore payable sometime in the

future, has stayed relatively constant because of the low

level of movement in the revaluation surplus in the year. 

As in previous years we also present Grainger NAV. This

reflects our estimate of the present value of the reversionary

surplus in our regulated and equity release portfolios. In

gross terms this is the difference between what we would

achieve on sale of our properties on vacancy and the value

attributed to them in the market value balance sheet. We

have calculated the after tax present value of that surplus 

by discounting it back over its expected average period 

of realisation at the discount rate of 8.6% (our weighted

average cost of capital plus a risk premium of 3% 

The group finances its operations through a combination 

of shareholders funds and borrowings with the objective 

of optimising weighted average cost of capital (‘WACC’)

whilst retaining funding flexibility. At 30 September 2005

our estimate of WACC was 5.58% (2004: 5.64%).

The group does not take trading positions in financial

instruments but holds them to minimise the risk of

exposure to fluctuating interest rates. The majority of our

debt is subject to protective swaps, caps or collars or is

maintained at fixed rates of interest. At 30 September

2005, £657m or 76% of the group’s net debt was either

fixed to termination, or for over one year, or was protected

by financial instruments (2004: 71%).

(2004: 8.6%). The adjustment increases NNNAV by 107p

A combination of interest rate swaps and financial caps is

per share to give Grainger NAV of 492p (2004: 480p).

used to provide a degree of certainty over future interest

It should be stressed that this calculation is based on current

house prices and assumes no future house price inflation.

An annual increase in house prices of 4% would increase

the adjustment to 177p and give a Grainger NAV of 562p.

Cash and Debt

Cash balances at the year end amounted to £53m,

representing 3.1% of our total market value gross assets.

Of this, £26m (2004:£30m), represents deposits received 

or acts as security for cash backed loan notes. 

Group borrowings have increased from £757m to £921m,

including capitalised loan costs of £7m (2004: £7m). These

will be written off over the period of the loan. The increase

in borrowings has principally arisen from the acquisition of

City North Group plc and West Waterlooville. 

rate costs whilst enabling the group to take advantage of

favourable short term rates. At 30 September 2005 the

group held £347m of swap contracts at an average pre

margin rate of 5.4% maturing between 2006 and 2014

(2004: £223m @ 5.4%). There were also financial caps 

in place of £265m at an average capped rate of 6.1%

expiring between 2006 and 2009 (2004: £233m @ 6.1%). 

The effect of the fair value adjustment of marking the

group’s fixed rate debt and derivatives to current market

rates (‘FRS13 adjustments’) would be to produce a notional

‘liability’ after tax of £10.6m or 8p per share (2004: 0p).

This adjustment represents approximately 1.1% of group

borrowings at 30 September 2005 and will not be

recognised in the accounts under current pre-IFRS rules

until the position matures or is terminated. 

A summary of our gross borrowings is:

Fixed to termination 

Hedged by swap contracts
Hedged by financial caps

Variable/fixed under one year

Total debt
Less: cash

Net debt

33

Principal 
£m

Interest
rate % Terminating

2006-32

2006-14
2006-09

2006-14

6.3

6.3
5.6

5.4

5.9

45

347
265

264

921
(53)

868

The group also maintains a range of borrowing maturities

It is likely that the introduction of IFRS will have an impact

to enable it to balance continuity of funding with flexibility.

on our disclosed net asset value. In common with many

At 30 September 2005 the average duration of the group

property companies, our borrowing powers, as set out in

debt was 5.1 years (2004: 6.4 years). 

our Articles of Association, are based upon a multiple of 

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

IFRS are mandatory for the main UK listed companies for

accounting periods ending on or after 31 December 2005

and so will affect Grainger’s financial statements for the

first time next year. As with most property companies, we

expect the main changes will arise in the areas of deferred

taxation, financial instruments, valuation movements and

treatment of goodwill. In particular, the FRS13 adjustment

and part of the contingent tax adjustment we currently

make to NAV to arrive at NNNAV will form a part of the

our adjusted net asset value. For this reason we are seeking

to amend the multiple in our Articles of Association at our

Annual General Meeting to be held on 2 March 2006.

Andrew Cunningham

Deputy chief executive and finance director

statutory balance sheet. The difference between NAV and

20 December 2005 

NNNAV will therefore represent the contingent tax on the

uplift of trading properties from book value to market

value. We anticipate that, along with other companies with

significant investment property assets, our income and

expenditure account will become more volatile as valuation

surpluses and deficits will be recognised therein. In line with

other FTSE companies, we will announce the restatement 

of prior year figures and the qualitative impacts on our

accounts prior to our half year in March 2006. 

34

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Prince William

Grainger were a main sponsor 

of The Tall Ships Races in July.

corporatesocialresponsibility

We seek to conduct our business in a socially responsible manner at all times

In 2005, we commissioned a comprehensive external review to ensure that our 

CSR strategy continues to address those issues that bear most relevance to our 

Calendar girls

unique business. 

We raised over £10,000 

Our strategic advisers, have conducted a review of our key impact areas and under-

for Shelter by producing

took structured interviews with a wide range of stakeholders. This has resulted in a

and selling a ‘Calendar

reformulation of our CSR policy statement and long-term CSR objectives to better 

girls’ calendar. 

reflect the most significant economic, social and environmental issues for our business.

35

CSR Policy statement

Grainger Trust plc is the UK’s largest quoted residential property investor owning 
over 12,000 units. As such, we manage residential and commercial space as well as
undertaking residential and mixed use developments. We recognise that our activities 
can have an adverse impact on the natural environment through the consumption of
resources and the generation of waste and pollution, and we seek to reduce this as 
far as possible. We also strive to address the economic and social impacts that we 
have in relation to our key stakeholders, including investors, employees, tenants and
customers, local communities and suppliers.

We view compliance with relevant environmental and social legislation as a minimum
standard, and seek to perform in line with good practice standards of relevance to our
industry. Our goal is to continually improve our economic, environmental and social
performance, which we achieve by setting meaningful objectives and targets, and
reviewing these on a regular basis. We believe that transparency and accountability
should underpin our CSR commitments, so we will report publicly on our management
and performance in this area. We are also committed to engaging into dialogue with 
our stakeholders, and enabling them to influence our approach to CSR.

This policy was last reviewed and updated in October 2005. It is accompanied 
by a set of strategic CSR objectives, which reflect our most significant areas 
of responsibility. 

Rupert Dickinson Chief executive officer

20 December 2005 

36

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate social responsibility continued

CSR objectives

The implementation of the company’s CSR policy will achieve the following 
strategic objectives:

• Encourage staff to contribute to, and share in, the success of the 

company through their own ideas and ongoing professional development, 
whilst supporting them to maintain a healthy balance between home 
and work commitments.

• Ensure that we treat our tenants and customers fairly, and that we 

are responsive to their needs.

• Reduce our direct adverse environmental impacts, and help and encourage 
our tenants and customers to do the same in respect of the properties 
they occupy.

• Seek to understand the needs of the communities within which we 

operate, and positively contribute to their well-being.

• Safeguard the health, safety and welfare of our employees, tenants, 
contractors, visitors, clients and the general public, where they may 
be affected by our activities.

• Engage proactively with prioritised suppliers to ensure that they meet 
with our specified economic, social and environmental standards.

• Maintain high standards of business conduct, and secure long-term 

sustainable returns for our investors. 

Here we describe our approach to these objectives, including current 
progress and our targets for the year ahead. 

37

Training and development

Encourage staff to contribute to, and share in, the success 
of the company through their own ideas and ongoing
professional development, whilst supporting them 
to maintain a healthy balance between home and work
commitments.

We recognise that the people we employ are more valuable than the assets which we own.

Our corporate culture is one of celebrating success, and encouraging entrepreneurialism,

allowing employees the freedom to use their initiative whilst giving them the support they

need to grow and develop in their careers.

We take all necessary steps to ensure that our people management practises are effective

and fair and processes are designed to ensure that we do not discriminate. We have

comprehensive equal opportunities and harassment policies, and we will continue to 

work in the coming year to embed these across our business.

Staff remuneration is regularly reviewed and was compared during 2005 against

independent industry benchmarks. We offer staff an extensive range of benefits including

private medical, pension, share saving schemes and generous maternity benefits. It is

important to the Grainger management team that all employees feel valued and supported

for the role which they play in the company’s success.

Grainger has a dedicated HR Development Manager who carries out an annual training

needs analysis across the group. This ensures that our training programmes effectively 

meet the needs of individuals and teams within the business. We offer work placements 

to students and staff can apply for sponsorship to study for professional qualifications and

other educational programmes. Over the last year, 31 employees undertook professional

education. Overall, the average annual number of training days per employee is three, 

an investment of £671 per head. We continually evaluate the effectiveness of training

provided, and during 2005, 87% of staff felt their performance had improved as a result 

of training.

We encourage a healthy balance between work and other commitments and have frequent

staff social activities. We are open to requests for flexible working which enabled over half

of our part-time workers (8%) to alter their working pattern to suit both their needs and

those of the business. 

Our current staff turnover rate is 10.4% per annum with 30% of employees having five 

or more years’ service. Our current male to female ratio is 4:5, with women holding 23.5%

of senior management positions and 16% of the technical or professional positions.

Targets 2006

• Continue to develop and embed our intranet, Source, into the business.

• Participate in the Times 100 Best Companies to Work For 2006 survey and use the
resulting information to identify areas for improvement in employee satisfaction as
measured in the subsequent year’s survey.

38

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate social responsibility continued

Ensure that we treat our tenants and customers fairly, 
and that we are responsive to their needs.

As a large residential landlord, our tenants play a pivotal role in our success. We seek 

to deliver high standards of service by being responsive to our tenants’ needs. Our 

credit control team are able to provide information and advice should our tenants find
themselves in financial difficulties with their rent. We recognise the diversity across our

tenant base and have introduced a variety of payment methods (including direct debits,

swipe cards at Post Offices and cheques) for their improved convenience.

Housing Ombudsman

To acknowledge that we may not always be able to resolve differences of opinion with 

Service

our customers we have joined the Housing Ombudsman scheme which provides an

We are pleased to have

become a voluntary

member of the Housing

Ombudsman Service. 

We are only the second

private landlord to have

joined the scheme which 

is obligatory to Housing

Associations. 

independent forum for dispute resolution at no cost to our tenants.

Our equity release customers are reassured by our membership of Safe Home Income 

Plans (SHIP) which provides a code of practice which members must adhere to.

As a responsible landlord we try to ensure that repairs are carried out promptly and

thoroughly. Our dedicated Repair Line enables tenants to directly contact a member of 

the property management team to report any maintenance issue whilst also providing

emergency cover when our offices are closed. Our long-term approach and regular

property visits enable us to build relationships with tenants and to develop strategies 

that enhance the value of our assets, while improving the quality of housing stock.

The Tenants Guide 

Targets 2006

• Roll out the ‘Warm Front’ initiative to all eligible regulated tenants in UK.

• Launch Tenants Guide packs for our regulated and ground rent tenants in the UK,

including a Tenants’ Charter.

• Monitor our performance against KPIs including the percentage of rent collected,
market-let void periods, number of formal complaints and analysis of tenant 

exit interviews. 

• Extend the tailor-made e-learning training programme to all property managers to 
help them in making decisions that balance business needs with those of tenants.

Reduce our direct adverse environmental impacts, and help
and encourage our tenants and customers to do the same 
in respect of the properties they occupy.

We recognise that people’s homes are fundamental components of a sustainable

community and we are committed to ensuring that our developments and services

contribute to social well-being. Our growing portfolio of developments provides a

significant opportunity to integrate these values and we aim to exploit the full potential 

of contemporary design to embed sustainability principles into new neighbourhoods.

39

This involves undertaking Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs), remediation works 

for regeneration projects, incorporating green spaces on brownfield land development, 

and often exceeding UK Building Regulations on environmental standards achieved such 

as water and energy efficiency.

We can not always quantify the environmental impact of our core housing stock due to its
age and construction. Energy efficiency and waste management issues are determined by our

tenants’ own activities and willingness to implement environmental good practice. However,

we try to engage with our tenants to encourage them to employ more efficient practices.

Case Study: Warm Front Initiative

Under the Warm Front Initiative, a significant proportion of our tenants may be entitled

to Government grants to fund improved heating and insulation within their homes. We

were keen to introduce our tenants to the scheme, and offer our assistance in applying

for the grants. Following a positive response to an initial group of tenants, we plan to

roll this out across our regulated portfolio. 

To further support this initiative, we will help certain tenants who are not eligible 

for assistance under the scheme. This is one way in which we do help our tenants to

improve their quality of life by tackling fuel poverty, improving energy efficiency and

simultaneously increasing the value of our properties.

Where properties have been sold and we retain some management responsibilities, we

liaise with local planning authorities to provide recycling services where schemes exist. 

Equally we encourage staff to adopt environmentally friendly practices by providing office

waste recycling schemes where possible, and by purchasing environmentally preferable

stationery and products. 

Targets 2006

• Develop and launch an environmental policy statement for our development activities,

and distribute this widely internally and to external stakeholders. 

• Provide guidance to prospective purchasers to assist them in managing their homes

efficiently and reducing their environmental footprint.

• Undertake a cost benefit analysis of achieving an EcoHomes rating of Good or Very

Good on all of our new development projects. 

• Identify meaningful measures of our environmental performance and monitor 

our performance against these. 

Environmental impact

40

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate social responsibility continued

Seek to understand the needs of the communities within
which we operate, and positively contribute to their 
well-being.

We have introduced several initiatives to ensure we act as a responsible corporate citizen. 

Since 2004, Shelter has been our Charity of the Year in recognition of the synergy between

our business and their charitable objectives. In 2005, we raised £30,764 through a series 

of imaginative initiatives and the involvement of over 180 Grainger staff.

Supporting Shelter

We also continue to support Open House through a range of activities, including the 

co-sponsoring of ‘Archikids’ Explorers Pack available free to children during the open 

house weekend. We will continue to support Open House in 2006.

‘The marvelous support of Grainger Trust has enabled thousands of young people to

encounter exemplary architecture through Junior Open House Awards and the ArchiKids

Explorer Packs. Both have a common theme – they encourage innovative ideas, nurture

young people’s creativity and enable them to contemplate the future development of

London’s built environment.

Grainger Trust is a forward-looking sponsor who has been a delight to work with. The

hands-on contributions of staff during the Open House London Annual Event were a

testament to the Grainger Trust’s commitment to enriching the city and its communities.

We look forward to continuing this fruitful relationship.’

Victoria Thornton, founding director

We have raised a total of £47,000 for various Charities including Comic Relief, Macmillan

Cancer Relief and Land Aid.

Supporting Open House

and community leaders, which has helped to create several hundred jobs and assist many

In the North East we participate in the Newcastle Employment Bond, sponsored by business

people into work.

We also sponsored the Tall Ships Races when they visited Newcastle Gateshead quayside in

July. Our sponsorship activities also enabled youngsters from a Northumberland community

group to have a private tour of the Prince William. 

Our residential properties are geographically scattered, however, where we own a 

number of properties within one neighbourhood, we aim to participate in local events 

and community forums. 

We recognise that our development activities can have an impact on local residents and

other stakeholders. We use a variety of methods to invite their feedback and address any

potential conflicts before they arise. Incorporating their views into our proposals significantly

enhances the prospective success of our planning applications, and contributes to creating

a more sustainable community. 

41

Smiths Dock

Hornsey Road Baths

Case Study: Regeneration Model for Smiths Dock Given Public View

A model of our proposals for a new urban village on the Smiths Dock area in North

Shields was put on public display in North Shields Library for over three weeks. We

presented our proposals to a number of resident groups from the local area at meetings.

‘The feedback we received from our meeting with the local resident groups last week

was very informative and has helped us to further formulate our plans. Overall they

were very positive towards our proposals!’

Ann Johnson, Land and Regeneration manager at Grainger

During construction, we seek minimum disruption to the community. We generally operate

the Considerate Constructor Scheme and liaise closely with community representatives and

local residents. We have a prompt and transparent approach when dealing with any issues

or concerns. 

We also try to ensure that our development activities bring associated economic benefits 

to local communities through regeneration and employment. We will typically employ 

local labour on development projects, whether or not this is a formal requirement under

Section 106 planning agreements. 

Case Study: Hornsey Road Baths and Barnsbury Complex

In Islington, London, we have carried out a consultation with the local Council and local

communities, since submitting our detailed planning application in January 2005. We

are working closely with our Guinness Trust to ensure that this mixed use and tenure

scheme is sustainable. 

Our proposals include 351 residential units of which 35% are affordable, a new council

office, a theatre and a Sure Start nursery. We were delighted to build a new climbing

wall for the local Montem School and contribute towards a new community facility 

for local young people.

Targets 2006

• Launch a payroll giving scheme to take advantage of the Government’s cash incentives

for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

• Introduce participation in the Considerate Constructor scheme as a standard contractual

requirement for construction companies employed on all new development projects. 

• Pilot a best practice community consultation technique (e.g. Enquiry by Design or

Planning for Real) for one of our regeneration projects.

42

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate social responsibility continued

Health and Safety

Safeguard the health, safety and welfare of our employees,
and where possible that of our tenants, contractors, visitors,
clients and the general public.

Health and Safety (herafter H&S) is an essential part of our business operation and it is our

responsibility to achieve the highest standards for our staff and those relevant stakeholders.

In recognition of this, during 2005 we appointed a H&S Manager to ensure consistent

standards across our activities. He is a key member of our H&S committee, chaired by the

deputy chief executive and made up of representatives from each division of the business. 

In the coming year, we will continue to review our approach to H&S, including training, 

to ensure it is customised to the specific requirements of our different business areas.

It is essential that our large contractor and supplier base have adequate H&S policies and

procedures and that high standards are being maintained. We have developed and issued 

H&S guidance to all our managing agents and property managers. Given the growth of 

our development activities, we recognise the particular H&S risks on construction sites. 

Our intention is to move beyond the review and approval of contractors’ H&S policies 

to monitoring the standards achieved on all of our projects.

We are delighted to report that there were no reportable RIDDOR major injuries involving staff

in 2005 and no fatalities on Grainger Homes or Grainger development sites during 2005.

Targets 2006

• Undertake a comprehensive review of H&S risks across the different divisions.

• Review and update the H&S guidance issued to managing agents.

• Provide H&S training to all managers in the development division and all 

property managers. 

Engage proactively with prioritised suppliers to ensure 
that they meet with our specified economic, social and
environmental standards.

We recognise that a number of our suppliers will have an indirect impact on our CSR

performance, particularly on our development projects. We consider track record, technical

expertise, and business management. However, we also consider H&S and environmental

performance, due to the risks these can present on-site. In the year ahead we have more

work to do in specifying and monitoring the CSR standards of our suppliers. 

Within tenanted residential, the majority of our suppliers are local small-works building 

and maintenance contractors who have earned our trust through their reliable and speedy

response. Prior to appointment, such suppliers are asked to provide necessary documentation,

including an adequate H&S policy. Given their size and number, it is particularly challenging

to monitor all suppliers consistently for their social and environmental credentials, but this has

been targeted for improvement next year. 

43

We receive approximately 5,000 invoices per year, paid on average 30 days after receipt.

We have centralised our purchase ledger activities and we are considering the introduction

of an electronic invoice tracking and approval system. 

Targets 2006

• Introduce a new electronic system for the approval and tracking of invoices.

• Launch an approved supplier database for tenanted residential repairs and

refurbishments to assist in tracking their CSR performance.

• Identify a set of CSR standards to be included in the standard contracts for 
construction companies appointed on major new development projects.

Maintain high standards of business conduct, and secure
long-term sustainable returns for our investors.

We strive to meet our investors’ expectations regarding corporate governance practices,

and continue to make diligent progress towards compliance with the revised Combined

Code (2003). All business risks such as reputational, environmental and health and safety

are formally evaluated within a risk review matrix according to likelihood of occurrence 

and potential impact. The audit committee meet quarterly to formulate the company’s

response to all significant risks. 

We keep investors well informed of our strategy through regular meetings, presentations

and property tours in order to provide them with a clear understanding of our business. 

It is essential that our business is well run, and that staff operate professionally and with

integrity at all times. The company’s policies and practice guidelines encompass the

standards to which we expect all our staff to adhere.

Targets 2006

• Develop and launch a Code of Conduct for staff incorporating updated confidential 

whistle-blowing procedures.

• Develop a policy and training on Money Laundering.

44

boardmembers

We have the resources for us to continue as a consistently successful long-term business

1

2

3

4

1

Robert Dickinson C.B.E., D.L. Chairman, chairman 

of Nomination Committee Aged 71, Solicitor

Appointed a director of the company in 1961, 

and chairman in 1992. Chairman of AON Minet

Pension Trust.

2

Rupert Dickinson M.R.I.C.S. Chief executive 

Aged 46, Chartered Surveyor

Joined the company in 1992 from Richard Ellis 

(now Insignia Richard Ellis). Appointed a director 

of the company in 1994. Appointed chief executive 

in October 2002.

3 Andrew Cunningham F.C.A. Deputy chief executive

and finance director Aged 49, Chartered Accountant. 

Joined Deloitte Haskins and Sells in London in 

1978 and worked in their Nairobi and Bristol offices

before being made a partner in Newcastle in 1989.

Appointed a director of the company in December

1996. Appointed deputy chief executive in 

December 2002.

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

45

5

6

7

8

Non-executive directors

4

Stephen Dickinson F.C.A. Deputy chairman, 

7

Robin Broadhurst C.B.E., F.R.I.C.S. Senior independent

member of Nomination Committee Aged 71, 

non-executive director, member of Nomination and Audit

Chartered Accountant

Committees Aged 59

In practice in British Virgin Islands 1963-1974. 

Appointed a director of the company in February 2004.

Appointed managing director of the company in 

Previously European chairman of Jones Lang La Salle.

1974. Upon retiring as managing director in October

Trustee and director of the Grosvenor Estate, a senior

2002, became deputy chairman. British Virgin Islands

advisor to Credit Suisse First Boston, property consultant

representative on United Kingdom Overseas Territories

to Sir Robert McAlpine Limited, member of the Prince’s

Association 1993-2004.

Council for the Duchy of Cornwall and director of the

5

Robert Hiscox M.A., A.C.I.I. Member of Nomination 

British Library.

and Remuneration Committees Aged 62

8

Bill Tudor John M.A. Chairman of Remuneration

Appointed a director of the company in March 2002. 

Committee, member of Audit Committee Aged 61

Chairman of Hiscox plc. Deputy chairman of Lloyd’s 

Appointed a director of the company in February 2005.

1993 to 1995.

6 

John Barnsley F.C.A. Chairman of Audit Committee,

Member of Remuneration Committee Aged 57,

Chartered Accountant. 

Appointed a director of the company in February 2002. 

Non-executive director of Northern Investors Company

plc and American Appraisal Associates LLP. Chairman
KCS plc 2005. Until December 2001 was a Senior 

Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Currently a managing director of Lehman Brothers,

previously a partner at Allen & Overy LLP for 29 years,

serving as senior partner for six years. Also deputy

chairman of the Portman Building Society and 

deputy chairman of the Bank of England Financial

Markets Law Committee. An associate fellow of 

Downing College, Cambridge. 

46

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate governance report

Grainger is, and always has been, committed to high

In June each year, the board meets for two days to receive

standards of corporate governance. The board believes that

presentations from senior management and discuss

good corporate governance is achieved through the way

strategy at length. This ensures that non-executives fully

that it acts, and does not necessarily automatically follow

understand and are able to impact the strategy of the

from ‘ticking boxes’. Where the group departs from the

group in bringing their respective experiences’ to bear.

Combined Code 2003 (‘the Code’), this has been an active
decision taken by the board that the provision is not in 

the best interests of the group.

As required by the Listing Rules, a statement of how the

principles of the Code are applied is given below, along

with our formal compliance statement and explanations

There is a formal schedule of matters reserved for the

Board’s Attention which includes:

• Setting the overall strategy

• Approving major transactions

• Setting debt/gearing limits and associated hedging strategy

where the code has not been applied. The main part of this

• Accounting policies

report should be read in conjunction with the individual

statements made by the board committees which follow.

Board Conduct

Other tasks which require main board director attention are

delegated to the board’s committees or to the executives.

Committee membership and chairmanship is therefore of

The board meets regularly, at least four times each year, 

the utmost importance to ensure each committee has the

for the consideration of strategy and to monitor and

necessary skills to properly discharge its duties.

evaluate the group’s performance and prospects. This

brings together a wealth and depth of experience ranging

from the cautious to the entrepreneurial, suitable to the

effective management of the group.

Relevant financial and non-financial information is supplied

to directors in a timely manner before each board/committee

meeting. Any ad hoc request for information from a

director is dealt with as a high priority. The directors have

The table below shows the attendance by each director 

direct access to the services of the company secretary, who

at the board meetings held during the year. Biographical

reports to the chairman regarding matters of corporate

details are given on pages 44 and 45.

governance. The appointment and removal of the company

Director

Robert Dickinson

Stephen Dickinson

Rupert Dickinson

Andrew Cunningham

Robin Broadhurst

Robert Hiscox

John Barnsley

Dec 
’04

Jan
’05

Feb
’05

Jun
’05

Sep
’05

secretary is a matter for the board as a whole. Procedures

also exist for directors to take independent professional

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

advice as required, at the group’s expense.

Roles

Grainger employs a relatively small board, which consisted

at the year end of the chairman, deputy chairman, two

executives and four non-executive directors. Each non-

executive is therefore required to participate in two

committees of the board and Robin Broadhurst was

appointed the senior independent director on the

retirement of Robin Herbert in February 2005.

Bill Tudor John*

n/a

n/a

n/a

Robin Herbert**

Nichola Pease**

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

* appointed after February 05 board meeting 

** resigned at February 05 board meeting 

47

The roles of chairman and chief executive are very distinct,

Independence

and a written division of their respective responsibilities 

The independence of the non-executive directors is the

has been reviewed and approved by the board as a whole. 

principal potentially contentious corporate governance

In brief, the principal differentiating factors are:

issue. The board does not consider that the criteria set 

Chairman

Chief executive

Reports to the board

Reports to the chairman

out in section A.3.1 of the Combined Code should be

taken as automatic failure of a director to be independent.
It is their fundamental belief that directors should be

Only the CEO and company  All executive management

assessed robustly as individuals, taking into account their

secretary report to him

report to him, directly

own unique experiences, reputations and competencies

or indirectly

along with their mindfulness and willingness to contribute

Responsible for running 

Responsible for running

to decisions of the board on the basis of those.

the board

the business

The board itself is in the best position to assess this, given

Guardian of the board’s 

Responsible for 

decision making

implementing the

board’s decisions

their knowledge and experience of working with the

individuals themselves as professionals. The board has

therefore, after diligent and careful consideration, assessed

the independence of the non-executives as follows:

Director

Board’s determination

Explanatory notes

Robert Dickinson

Not independent

• close family ties

Chairman

• more than nine years‘service

Stephen Dickinson

Not independent

• close family ties

Deputy Chairman

• more than nine years’ service

• previously managing director

• part-time executive responsibilities

• participation in all employee share schemes

Robin Broadhurst

Independent

• although previously European chairman at Jones Lang LaSalle, 

this firm no longer values any of Grainger’s properties, so there 

is no material business relationship under A.3.1

• regarded as independent by search consultants used for 

his appointment

Robert Hiscox

Independent

• although a trustee for an Estate containing a material shareholding,

the board is of the opinion that this position does not interfere with 

or influence his character or judgement in any way. As chairman of

Hiscox plc, and past deputy chairman of Lloyd’s, Mr Hiscox brings

extensive skills and experience in his own right, which can only be

beneficial to Grainger’s board

48

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate governance report continued

Director (continued)

Board’s determination

Explanatory notes

John Barnsley

Independent

• John Barnsley was not connected with any service provided to

Grainger in the period to December 2001, whilst he was a partner 

at PwC, the group’s current auditors. From December 2004, the

customary ‘three-year period’ had in any event elapsed. Mr Barnsley
has no continuing personal interests with PwC.

• Grainger was as new to Mr Barnsley as Mr Barnsley was to Grainger

on appointment

Bill Tudor John

Independent

• no A.3.1 criteria relevant

(appointed 24 February 2005)

Robin Herbert 

Independent

• the board does not consider length of service, on its own,to affect 

(resigned 24 February 2005)

– the independence of its directors. Mr Herbert’s length of service was

considered an asset by fellow directors as he continued to keep apace

with the changes and unpredicted growth of Grainger and contribute

to all debates with a fresh mind, taking each decision in turn.

Nichola Pease

Independent

• no A.3.1 criteria relevant.

(resigned 24 February 2005)

The board therefore concluded that it included five

continuity of leadership is a real asset. The board in fact

independent non-executive directors up until 24 February

considers itself fortunate to have retained the services 

2005 and four thereafter, maintaining a majority of

of several long-standing directors for extended periods.

independent non-executive directors through the year

Along with those directors retiring by rotation, the

under review.

Retirement by Rotation and Re-election 

Although board members have been required to stand 

for re-election at intervals of no more than three years 

for several years now, the board believes it is important 

to maintain stability and continuity for longer periods.

Principally this is due to the long-term nature of the 

chairman and deputy chairman will stand for re-election

again this year, having passed the age of 70 and having

been directors of the company for more than nine years.

Their experience of the long-term residential market is

invaluable to the group and, whilst they are willing and

able, the board considers itself fortunate to benefit from

their continued services.

group’s core businesses. The process of purchasing land,

Induction, Evaluation and Training

negotiating planning and then subsequent development 

During the year, the induction and evaluation processes

to sale can amount to many years’ hard work, where 

were both formalised and comprised the following 

key elements:

Induction:

• Two ‘manuals’ of information, delivered separately, containing all board standing policies and 

procedures, latest risk assessments, market consensus information, committee composition, glossary 

of industry terms etc.

• Meetings with executives and senior management, where presentations were delivered to cover 

all business areas.

• An invitation to join the next available tour of examples of the group’s properties.

49

Evaluation:

• A questionnaire was completed by board members, whereby possible characteristics of a board were

rated depending upon whether Grainger’s board would always, never or sometimes act in a particular

way. This part of the process resulted in an effective self-assessment of the board as a whole.

• The chairman formally interviewed each director, with an agenda of items covering board, committee

and individual director evaluation. Results of the individual meetings are held only by the chairman 
and company secretary so that directors are encouraged to be open and free with their views. 

Particular topics for discussion were tabled due to their importance to Grainger either currently 

or in the near future.

• The non-executives, led by Robin Broadhurst (the senior independent director) met to evaluate the

chairman. They assessed the leadership capabilities of the chairman against commonly accepted

attributes of an effective chairman, taking into account the views of the executives.

• Feedback was discussed by the board as a whole. There were no comments regarding individuals

required to be made, which would have been made directly by the chairman to the individual concerned.

• As a result, the board decided that its main priority should be to spend more time discussing strategy.

This was not to be to the detriment of its monitoring role, so additional informal strategy discussions

have begun to take place. Ultimately, decisions will still be made at formal board meetings.

• No other significant areas for development were highlighted, although some interesting matters were

raised prompting further debate.

Should the need for any further training be identified, this

The annual general meeting is the primary route for

would be provided to directors on appointment or thereafter.

communication with smaller/private shareholders, although

The board is provided with technical updates relating to 

the property industry and the listed company regime, 

as appropriate.

Relations with Shareholders and Potential Investors

The chief executive and deputy chief executive/finance

director meet regularly with institutional shareholders and

analysts. In addition to the usual meetings after results

announcements, ad hoc meetings are arranged to continue

dialogue throughout the year. In particular, during the year

under review, the group’s chief executive and deputy chief

executive/finance director have, between them, conducted

over 80 meetings with shareholders, potential investors 

and analysts. Further, the executives, senior management

and the group’s broker conducted two property tours

during the year predominantly for shareholders. Feedback

gathered by the group’s broker and financial PR agent

following such meetings and presentations is always

presented to the board as a whole and the board is briefed

on the views of major shareholders. Non-executive directors

are available for meetings with the same, although there

have been no requests for such meetings in the year under

review, or since the year end.

the group’s website also includes a specific Investor

Relations section and has been significantly developed in

the current year. All directors attend the annual general

meeting, and the chairmen of all committees are available

to answer questions. The notice of meeting and annual

report and accounts are sent out at least 20 working 

days before the meeting. Separate votes are held for 

each proposed resolution, including the approval of the

remuneration committee report, and a proxy count is 

given in each case after the voting on a show of hands. 

At the Annual General Meeting in February 2005, Grainger

introduced a ‘vote withheld’ category, in line with best

practice. Shareholders were also able to lodge their votes 

through the CREST system.

Internal Control

The group has a cyclical process for identifying, assessing

and managing its significant risks, which has been in place

for the full year under review and in the period up to the

date of approval of these financial statements. The process

is designed to enable the board to be confident that such

risks are mitigated, or controlled as far as possible. It should

be noted however that no system can eliminate the risk of

50

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate governance report continued

failure to achieve business objectives entirely and can only

of independence which determines compliance with the

provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against

Code and therefore no non-compliance on grounds of

material misstatement or loss. The audit committee is

independence has been recorded.

delegated the task of reviewing all identified risks, with the

absolute key risks retained for full board review. Risks and

controls are reviewed to ensure effective management of
appropriate strategic, financial, operational and compliance

issues. The audit committee also reviews the half year and

full year financial statements and holds discussions with 

the group’s auditors. In addition, the group has an internal

audit function which performs relevant reviews as part of a

programme approved by the audit committee. The committee

considers any issues or risks arising therefrom in order that

appropriate actions can be undertaken for their satisfactory

resolution. The Internal Audit Manager has a direct

reporting line to the chairman of the audit committee.

An annual budget is produced, together with longer term

projections, which are presented to the board for approval.

At each meeting the board discusses progress against the

budget and monitors any variances. Where applicable,

revisions are made to expected outturn against which

further progress can be monitored.

The board also discusses in detail the projected financial

impact of major proposed acquisitions and disposals,

including their financing. All such proposed substantial

investments are considered by all directors. Where 

meetings are required between board meetings and 

a full complement of directors cannot be achieved, an

executive committee of directors considers the necessary

formalities. The board is also responsible for the discussion

and approval of the group’s treasury strategy, including

mitigation against changes in interest rates. 

Going Concern

After making enquiries, including the review of future

anticipated cash flows and banking covenants, the directors

have a reasonable expectation that the group and company

have adequate resources to continue in existence for the

foreseeable future. For this reason they continue to adopt

the going concern basis in preparing the accounts.

Compliance Statement

Independence of non-executive directors is explained in

detail above. In the board’s view it is their assessment 

Except as noted below, the board considers that it 

has complied with the Code during the year ended 

30 September 2005:

A.1.3 No formal meetings were held by the chairman with

the non-executives, without the executives present.

The board decided however at its September 2005

meeting that although not anticipated to be of

significant value this could not be seen to be against

the best interests of the company and have resolved

to hold at least one such meeting during the next

financial year.

B.1.6 As explained in detail in the Directors’ Remuneration

Report, Rupert Dickinson and Andrew Cunningham

currently hold service contracts with notice periods 

in excess of one year. The notice periods are being

reduced from two years to one year on a straight 

line basis over a period of five years from 1 October

2002. At the date of this report the notice period

outstanding stood at approximately 16 months.

Report of the Nomination Committee

The nomination committee consists of the chairman and

two non-executive directors. The committee last met in

September 2004 and the attendance of individual directors

together with their dates of service on the committee are

shown below:

Robert Dickinson

Chairman

Robert Hiscox
Member

Robin Broadhurst
Member (appointed 24 Feb 2005)

Robin Herbert

Member (resigned 24 Feb 2005)

Nichola Pease

Member (resigned 24 Feb 2005)

Sep
’04

✓

✓

n/a

✓

✓

The terms of reference of the nomination committee are

available on the group’s website and principally relate to

filling vacancies on the board, whether arising through

resignation, retirement or desired expansion and also

consideration of succession planning.

The committee has appointed Spencer Stuart, specialist

search agents, in order to make any independent non-

executive appointments. The nomination committee first

discuss with the board the desirable background and

experience of any new non-executive, and then approach

the agency with this information. 

John Barnsley

Chairman

Robin Broadhurst
Member

Bill Tudor John

Member (appointed 24 Feb 2005)

Robin Herbert

Member (resigned 24 Feb 2005)

51

Nov 
’04

Feb May
’05
’05

✓

✓

✓

✗*

n/a

n/a

✓

✓

✓

Sep
’05

✓

✓

✓

✓

✓

n/a

n/a

The nomination committee is also responsible for reviewing

* Due to unforeseen circumstances the meeting date had to be changed

the desirability of the continuation of service of directors

required to retire by rotation. In this regard each of the

directors required to retire by rotation this year has

and Mr Broadhurst was unable to attend. Mr Broadhurst received the

committee papers as normal, and discussed his views with Mr Barnsley

prior to the meeting. 

continued to demonstrate full, capable and committed

The audit committee adheres to particularly strict and

participation in setting and monitoring strategy for the

detailed terms of reference, which are available for

group. Details of those directors standing for re-election 

inspection on the group’s website. In addition to the work

in the March 2006 annual general meeting are given in 

described within the ‘Internal Control’ section of the main

the Annual General Meeting circular to be sent out with

report above, the audit committee is also responsible for

copies of the Annual Report and Accounts. Biographies of

reviewing the independence of the external auditor, which

directors are given on pages 44 and 45. During the year, all

includes the approval of any non-audit service fees above a

matters relating to the work of the nomination committee

relatively nominal level. The audit committee is responsible

were discussed by the full board and therefore no separate

for making recommendations to the board in connection

meetings were held.

Report of the Audit Committee

with the appointment of the external auditor and the level

of the audit fee.

The audit committee meets four times each year, ahead of

The deputy chief executive/finance director and external

each board meeting, reporting any relevant matters to the

audit partner as well as other senior management are

board where fit. Attendance of the individual directors and

invited to attend meetings of the committee. Once each

dates of service on the committee are shown below. In the

year the audit committee meet with management without

opinion of the directors, the audit committee comprised

the auditors present and also with the auditors without

three independent non-executive directors throughout the

management present.

period, and Mr Barnsley has the particular recent, relevant

financial experience required by the Code.

By order of the board 

Marie Glanville
Company Secretary

20 December 2005

52

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Report of the remuneration committee

This report meets the disclosure requirements of the

shareholders in March 2002. The committee continue to

Companies Act and the Listing Rules and in accordance

keep the terms of this scheme in particular under review

with usual practice will be put to shareholders for approval

given the seemingly constantly changing ‘best practice’

at the Annual General Meeting.

guidelines. The first award made under the current rules 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have audited the directors’

of this scheme will vest in January 2006. 

remuneration, pensions, share option and long-term incentive

The Committee has also received advice from the group’s

schemes sections of this report (‘the auditable part’).

HR Manager, who was invited to attend remuneration

The Remuneration Committee

committee meetings when appropriate.

The composition and attendance of the individual directors

The committee’s terms of reference are available on the

at the three remuneration committee meetings held during

group’s website.

the year were as follows:

Robert Hiscox

Member 

Chairman (24 Feb 2005 – 15 Sept 2005)

John Barnsley
Member

Bill Tudor John

Member (appointed 24 Feb 2005)
Chairman (appointed 15 Sept 2005)

Nichola Pease
Chairman (resigned 24 Feb 2005)

Dec 
’04

Jun
’05

Sep
’05

✗

✓

✓

✓

✗

✓

✓

✓

✓

n/a

✓

n/a

n/a

✓

n/a

n/a

In the opinion of the directors the committee therefore

comprised three independent non-executives throughout

the year. Certain shareholder pressure groups raised

concerns that Mr Hiscox, as trustee of an estate containing

Remuneration Policy

Grainger’s remuneration policy is designed to attract,

motivate and retain high calibre individuals to enable the

group to operate strategically for the continued benefit of

shareholders, over the long term. In order to operate this

policy, the Remuneration Committee receives information

on remuneration packages awarded to directors in

comparable organisations and aims to ensure that the

rewards paid by Grainger are competitive.

The policy is also designed to align the directors’ interests

n/a

n/a

with those of shareholders. This is principally achieved

through the use of share-based incentives and by

encouraging executive directors to maintain a reasonable

shareholding in the group. Details of executive directors’

shareholdings are shown on page 59. Share awards are

generally satisfied by the acquisition of shares in the

market, so are not dilutive to shareholders. Share options

are satisfied by the issue of new share capital.

a material shareholding, should not be regarded as

Remuneration packages include salary, bonus and defined

independent. Although this is robustly not the view of

contribution pension elements as well as long-term share

Grainger’s board, it reluctantly accepted that Mr Hiscox

incentive and option schemes. Usual benefits are also afforded.

should remain as a member only. The board appointed 

Mr Tudor John as chairman of the committee, at the 

end of its 15 September meeting.

No executive director is involved in the determination 

of their own remuneration. Fees of the non-executive

directors, which are set partly under consideration of 

The committee appointed and received advice during the

their committee responsibilities, are determined by the

year from New Bridge Street Consultants LLP (‘NBSC’)

Board as a whole. 

regarding the competitiveness of overall packages for the

executive directors and on the group’s incentive schemes.

NBSC also provided updates on Grainger’s performance 

in relation to the long-term incentive schemes.

Over the last three years, the committee has also received
advice from Mercers, in particular in relation to the design

The salaries and bonuses of Senior management are

determined by the executive directors and reviewed by 

the remuneration committee. Senior management also

participate in the long-term incentive scheme described

below and the level of their participation is included in 

the tables on page 54. Usual benefits are also afforded 

of the long-term incentive plan, which was approved by

to these individuals.

53

Contract
date

Unexpired

term*

19 July 1996

26 July 2000

No fixed term

No fixed term

Notice
period

16 months

16 months

17 July 1998
28 February 2000

26 February 2004

27 February 2003

6 March 2002

24 February 2005

10 months
5 months

5 months

5 months

5 months

5 months

None
None

None

None

None

None

Service Contracts

Rupert Dickinson

Andrew Cunningham

Robert Dickinson
Stephen Dickinson

Robin Broadhurst

John Barnsley

Robert Hiscox

Bill Tudor John

* Calculated as at 30 September 2005 and rounded to the nearest whole month.

As noted previously, Rupert Dickinson and Andrew

received a fully expensed company car, or a car allowance.

Cunningham each hold service contracts with notice periods

Along with all members of staff, executive directors also

decreasing on a straight line basis from two years to one

benefit from private medical and life insurances.

year, over a period of five years which began on 1 October

2002. At the date of this report therefore the notice periods

have been reduced to approximately 16 months. Their

contracts were dated 19 July 1996 and 26 July 2000

respectively. Sean Slade held a contract with a twelve 

month notice period, which was dated 22 January 2002.

Apart from salary and benefits in relation to the notice

period described above, there are no other terms in any 

of the directors’ contracts which would give rise to

compensation payable for early termination, or any other

liability of the company.

The chairman’s and non-executive directors’ fees are

reviewed on a biennial basis by the whole board. 

Pensions

The group contributes 15% of basic salary to the money

purchase pension schemes of Rupert Dickinson and Andrew

Cunningham, and contributed 10% to that of Sean Slade.

No other elements of remuneration are pensionable.

Share schemes open to all Employees

Executive directors, and Stephen Dickinson, deputy

chairman, are eligible to participate in two share schemes

which are open to all employees with relevant service,

No executive director holds a non-executive directorship

subject to the rules of the schemes.

outside of the group.

Each non-executive director has specific terms of reference.

Their letters of appointment state an initial one-year period,

with a continuation subject to review at that time. The

letters of appointment contain no entitlement to

compensation for early termination.

Non-Performance Related Remuneration

Basic Salaries and Benefits

Basic salaries are reviewed by the remuneration committee

annually. Uplifts are by reference to cost of living,

responsibilities and market rates, as for all employees and

are performed at the same time of year. Executive directors

and the deputy chairman, Stephen Dickinson, who has part-
time executive responsibilities, specifically including land and

regeneration, along with other senior members of staff,

The first is a Save as you Earn scheme (SAYE), and the

second a Share Incentive Plan (SIP). Both are Inland Revenue

approved and therefore subject to the limits prescribed.

Amounts relating to directors’ participation in the SIP 

and share options under the SAYE scheme are shown 

on pages 56 and 57. 

Performance Related Remuneration

A significant element of executive directors’ and senior

management’s potential remuneration is performance

related. The combination of short and long-term incentives

attempt to align the interests of executives and senior

management with the interests of shareholders, and to

reward significant outperformance of budgeted expectations.

Non-executive directors do not receive performance related

remuneration.

54

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Report of the remuneration committee continued

Annual Discretionary Bonus

Long-term Incentives

Each year the remuneration committee considers the award

Grainger’s policy in relation to long-term incentive schemes

of a bonus to the executive directors, which is at their

has evolved over time to more closely align the long-term

ultimate discretion. The chief and deputy chief executives,

interests of executives and senior management with those

Rupert Dickinson and Andrew Cunningham participate in

of shareholders, to reward sustained performance over a

an arrangement introduced in 2003 whereby the
provisional bonus is calculated over a three-year period, by

number of financial years and to encourage the executives
to grow their shareholdings.

reference to the enhancement of the triple net asset value

of Grainger, relative to a theoretical market comparator.

The comparator movement is calculated with regard to 

the Nationwide and Halifax house price indices and also

interest rates – using five-year swap rates. Bonuses remain

capped at 150% of salary which would only be achieved

under exceptional performance conditions. Subject always

to the Committee’s discretion, one third of the calculated

amount is approved for payment and the provisional

balance is taken into account over the next two years. 

The award payable for the year ended 30 September 

Executive directors and senior management are eligible to

receive annual conditional awards of shares worth up to

50% of salary under the Long-Term Incentive Scheme and

of share options up to a maximum of 125% of salary

under the Executive Share Option Scheme. The awards

under both schemes become unconditional provided

challenging performance criteria are satisfied over a single

three-year performance period following grant. The criteria

for all awards granted since March 2002 have been based

on Total Shareholder Return (TSR) – dependent upon where

Grainger’s TSR lies with respect to a pre-determined

2005 represents 63% of salary for that year (2004: 61%). 

comparator group as follows:

Comparator Companies:

Performance Condition

Vesting of Option

Brixton plc

Capital and Regional plc

If Grainger’s TSR is equal to or greater than the 

CLS Holdings plc

Daejan Holdings plc

upper quartile TSR of the comparator companies

100%

Derwent Valley Holdings plc

If Grainger’s TSR is above the median but below the 

Freeport plc

Great Portland Estates plc

upper quartile TSR of the comparator companies 

Pro-rata vesting

London Merchant Securities plc

If Grainger’s TSR is equal to the median TSR of the

Minerva plc

Mountview Estates plc

Pillar Property plc 

comparator companies

If Grainger’s TSR is below the median TSR of the 

(until it was de-listed on 29 July 2005)

comparator companies

40%

0%

Quintain Estates and Development plc

Shaftesbury plc

The Unite Group plc

As shown in the table above, no award vests unless Grainger’s TSR is higher than the median TSR of the comparator group.

55

Total shareholder return graph

00

01

02

03

04

05

500

400

300

200

100

0

GRAINGER TRUST
COMPARATOR GROUP
FTSE REAL ESTATE
FTSE 250 INDEX

These performance criteria are believed to be stretching,

The original comparator group was established in 2002

but realistic and reward executives if Grainger’s return 

with fourteen companies, two of which have since been

to shareholders outperforms this group of companies

taken over. To maintain a reasonable size for the group 

operating in broadly similar markets. 

and to prevent it having to be regularly modified for such

The graph above shows TSR (based upon share price

growth with dividends reinvested) for Grainger, compared

to the comparator group, the FTSE 250 and the FTSE Real

changes, the Remuneration Committee has decided that it

should be expanded with effect from the awards to be made

in January 2006 and that the following will be included:

Estate Index. These comparators have been chosen on 

Workspace Group plc

Warner Estate Holdings plc

the basis that they are the markets within which 

Big Yellow Group plc

A & J Mucklow Group plc

Grainger operates. 

Mapeley Limited

St Modwen Properties plc

Helical Bar plc

56

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Report of the remuneration committee continued
The following parts of the remuneration committee report have been audited.

Directors’ Remuneration

Chairman, deputy chairman
and executive directors

Non-performance related remuneration
Salary and fees
Taxable benefits
Share incentive plan
Compensation for loss of office
Ex-gratia payment

Total non-performance related 

remuneration

Performance related remuneration
Annual discretionary bonus

Total Performance related remuneration
Total Remuneration for the year ended 

30 September 2005

Total Remuneration for the year ended 

Robert

Stephen
Dickinson Dickinson Dickinson
£’000

£’000

£’000

Andrew
Rupert  Cunning-
ham
£’000

108
–
–
–
–

142
17
6
–
–

420
21
6
–
–

315
16
6
–
–

Sean
Slade
£’000

13
2
1
221
30

Total
£’000

998
56
19
221
30

108

165

447

337

267

1,324

–

–

–

–

267

267

198

198

–

–

465

465

108

165

714

535

267

1,789

30 September 2004

90

146

678

506

215

1,635

Pension contributions into money 

purchase schemes

Year ended 30 September 2005
Year ended 30 September 2004

–
–

–
–

Non- executive directors

Robin
Broadhurst
£’000

John
Barnsley
£’000

Robert
Hiscox
£’000

John
Ward 
£’000

Non-performance related remuneration
Salary and fees
Taxable benefits

34
–

Share incentive plan
Compensation for loss of office
Ex-gratia payment

Total non-performance related 

remuneration

Performance related remuneration
Annual discretionary bonus

Total Performance related 

remuneration

Total Remuneration for the 

–
–
–

34

–

–

year ended 30 September 2005

34

Total Remuneration for the 

year ended 30 September 2004

15

38
–

–
–
–

38

–

–

38

28

34
–

–
–
–

34

–

–

34

25

–
–

–
–
–

–

–

–

–

12

63
60

Bill
Tudor
John
£’000

18
–

–
–
–

18

–

–

18

–

47
45

2
16

112
121

Robin
Herbert
£’000

Nichola
Pease
£’000

Total
£’000

Total
2005
£’000

15
–

–
–
–

15

–

–

15

30

15
–

–
–
–

154
–

1,152
56

–
–
–

19
221
30

15

154

1,478

–

–

15

30

–

–

465

465

154

1,943

140

1,775

57

Taxable benefits for Stephen Dickinson, Rupert Dickinson, Andrew Cunningham and Sean Slade relate to car benefit 

and private medical insurance. In addition, Stephen Dickinson and Rupert Dickinson received a taxable fuel benefit.

On 24 February 2005, Bill Tudor John was appointed as a director. This followed Robin Herbert’s and Nichola Pease’s

resignations of the same date. In the previous year, Robin Broadhurst was appointed on 26 February 2004, following 

John Ward’s resignation of the same date. Sean Slade resigned from the board on 12 November 2004.

Directors’ Share Options

5p ordinary shares (thousands)
Dates Exercisable

Stephen 
Dickinson

Rupert
Dickinson

Exercise price
5p shares

30 Sep
2005

30 Sep
2004

30 Sep
2005

30 Sep
2004

Andrew
Cunningham
30 Sep
2004

30 Sep
2005

Sean
Slade

Total

30 Sep
2005

30 Sep
2004

30 Sep
2005

30 Sep
2004

Non-performance related 

(available to all staff)

SAYE scheme

8 Aug 07 – 8 Feb 08

1 Sep 08 – 1 Mar 09

Performance related 
(conditional awards)

163.6p

186.46p

Inland Revenue Approved Executive 

Share Option Scheme

19 Jul 99 – 19 Jul 06

23 Dec 99 – 23 Dec 06

Long-Term Incentive Scheme

9 Jul 00 – 9 Jul 07

24 Jan 06 – 24 Jan 13

12 Jan 07 – 12 Jan 14
11 Jan 08 – 11 Jan 15

58.4p

68.5p

53.42p

191.8p

326.4p
381.8p

* Share options granted in the year.

–

9

–

–

–

–

–
–

9

–

9

–

–

–

–

–
–

9

10

–

10

–

10

–

10

–

–

–

–

–

–

44

64

196

153
138*

561

64

196

153
–

423

37

143

115
103*

452

–

44

37

143

115
–

349

–

–

–

–

–

38

–
–

10

–

20

9

30

9

51

–

39

98

61
–

–

44

101

377

268
241*

51

44

140

437

329
–

38

259 1,060 1,040

Note that the each 25p Ordinary Share was split into five 5p ordinary shares in February 2005. All share options shown

above are based on 5p ordinary shares including the comparatives which have been restated accordingly.

The market price of the company’s shares at the end of the financial year was £4.56, and the range during the year was

£3.18 to £4.57 (as adjusted for the share split in February 2005).

The current long-term incentive scheme replaced the old Executive Share Option Scheme, however some options granted

under this scheme are still in existence and are disclosed above. Exercise is conditional upon a growth in earnings per 

share in excess of the retail price index over a period of three consecutive years during the period of the option.

58

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Report of the remuneration committee continued

Directors’ Share Awards

5p ordinary shares (thousands)

Performance related 
(conditional awards)

Long-Term Incentive Scheme

Rupert 
Dickinson

Award
date

Earliest
vesting
date

Shares
30 Sep
2005

Shares
30 Sep
2004

Andrew
Cunningham
Shares
30 Sep
2004

Shares
30 Sep
2005

Sean
Slade

Total

Shares
30 Sep
2005

Shares
30 Sep
2004

Shares
30 Sep
2005

Shares
30 Sep
2004

1999 scheme (matching awards)

5 Dec 05

2002 scheme

2003 scheme

2004 scheme

24 Jan 03 24 Jan 06

12 Jan 04 12 Jan 07

11 Jan 05 11 Jan 08

55*

52

78

61

52

78

61

–

45

57

46

41*

45

57

46

–

–

–

–

–

–

20

39

25

–

84

97

135

107

96*

117

174

132

–

435

423

246

191

189

148

* Share options granted in the year.

The above share awards expire 60 days after the earliest vesting date.

Deferred Bonus

As reported fully in previous years, Rupert Dickinson and Andrew Cunningham participate in a one-off deferred bonus

scheme as detailed below:

Original monetary 
amount

Equivalent number of shares,
based on average share price 
1 Oct 00 – 30 Sep 01 
(£1.4264) 5p Shares

First tranche – vested 
11 Dec 03 (mid-market
value £3.15) 5p Shares

Second tranche – to vest
in Dec 05 following results
announcement* 5p Shares

Rupert Dickinson

£600,000

Andrew Cunningham

£300,000

420,650

210,320

210,325

105,160

210,325

105,160

* Providing still in full time employment and not under notice to leave.

Sean Slade announced his resignation on 12 November 2004. The remuneration committee awarded him 15,055 shares

and 37,635 options under current long-term incentive schemes. Sean exercised these options in October 2005 making a

gain of £93,147. These awards took into account the time elapsed since the grant of the awards and the performance of

the group as required by the rules of the scheme. All other share awards and share options under current long-term

incentive schemes lapsed.

Sean also received 13,275 shares relating to the matching award which would have vested in December 2005. Just prior to

resignation he exercised 51,365 approved share options making a gain of £142,076 and he retained 38,560 options which

were exercised in May 2005 making a gain of £124,772.

Sean’s share options under the SAYE scheme lapsed on his leaving the company. All of the share awards and share options shown

in the tables and notes above are based on 5p ordinary shares including the comparatives which have been restated accordingly.

On behalf of the board

Bill Tudor John

Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

20 December 2005

59

Directors’ report for the year ended 30 September 2005.

The directors present their report and the audited financial

An interim dividend of 1.70p per share (2004: 0.81p) was

statements for the year ended 30 September 2005.

paid on 22 July 2005 amounting to £2.2m (2004: £1.0m)

Principal activities

During the year the group has continued its activities of

property trading and development.

Review of business development and prospects

Development of the group’s activities and its prospects are

reviewed in the chairman’s statement on pages 18 and 19

and the chief executive’s statement on pages 20 to 24.

Results for the year

The results of the group are set out in the consolidated

profit and loss account on page 66 which shows a profit 

on ordinary activities after taxation for the financial year 

of £26.5m (2004: £33.0m).

and the directors recommend the payment of a final

dividend of 3.41p per share (2004: 3.84p), to be paid on 

8 March 2006, amounting to £4.4m (2004: £4.7m). The

profit, after dividend, of £19.9m (2004: £27.3m) will be
transferred to reserves.

Directors

The directors of the company who served during the year

are listed on page 56. 

Directors’ and other interests

The interests of the directors in the shares of the company

at 30 September 2005 and 6 December 2005, with

comparative figures as at 1 October 2004 (or date of

appointment, if later), are as follows:

Ordinary shares of 5p each (thousands)

Robert Dickinson

Stephen Dickinson

Rupert Dickinson

Robin Broadhurst

Andrew Cunningham

John Barnsley

Robert Hiscox
Bill Tudor John**

1 Oct*
2004

1,008

3,856

1,246

–

371

14

–
–

Beneficial
30 Sept
2005

958

3,758

1,248

–

371

14

–
–

6 Dec
2005

958

3,758

1,248

–

372

14

10
–

Non-beneficial
30 Sept
2005

1 Oct*
2004

2,286

2,705

214

–

–

–

2,102

2,436

212

–

–

–

6 Dec
2005

2,102

2,436

212

–

–

–

12,500
–

10,227
–

10,227
–

6,495

6,349

6,360

17,705

14,977

14,977

* or date of appointment, if later

** Bill Tudor John was appointed on 24 February 2005.

Shares held in trust of which Robert Dickinson is a trustee, included in the above beneficially owned by:

Ordinary shares of 5p each (thousands)

1 Oct*
2004

Beneficial
30 Sept
2005

5

5

5

–

–

–

6 Dec
2005

–

–

–

Non-beneficial
30 Sept
2005

1 Oct*
2004

6 Dec
2005

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Stephen Dickinson

Rupert Dickinson

Andrew Cunningham

* or date of appointment, if later

All of the shareholdings shown above and in the tables on page 60 are based on 5p ordinary shares including the
comparatives which have been restated accordingly.

60

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Directors’ report continued

Shares held in trust of which Robert Dickinson and Stephen Dickinson are both trustees, included in the above 

non-beneficial holdings:

Ordinary shares of 5p each (thousands)

1 Oct
2004

–

Beneficial
30 Sept
2005

–

6 Dec
2005

–

Non-beneficial
30 Sept
2005

–

1 Oct
2004

69

6 Dec
2005

–

Details of directors’ share options are given on page 57.

Save as disclosed above, as at 6 December 2005, the

Statement of directors’ responsibilities

company is aware of the following interests amounting 

The directors are required by UK Company law to prepare

to 3% or more in the company’s shares:

financial statements for each financial year that give a true

5p shares

(thousands) Holding %

and fair view of the affairs of the company and the group

as at the end of the financial year and of the profit and loss

of the group for that period.

9,221

7.13

The directors confirm that suitable accounting policies have

Schroder Investment 

Management Limited*

Taube Hodson and 

Stonex Partners Limited*

Aberforth Partners*

F&C Asset Management Plc*

7,787

6,566

5,316

6.02

5.07

4.11

3.52

3.25

Morley Fund Management Limited*

4,552

Majedie Asset Management*

4,203

* Shares held by funds managed or advised by the company indicated

and/or its subsidiaries. 

The company is not aware of any other substantial interests amounting

to 3% or more.

Retirement of directors

On 12 November 2004 Sean Slade resigned from the

Board. Robin Herbert and Nichola Pease resigned from 

the board on 24 February 2005.

Directors’ interests in significant contracts

No directors were materially interested in any contract 

of significance.

Insurance of directors

been used and applied consistently and that reasonable

and prudent judgements and estimates have been made 

in the preparation of the financial statements for the year

ended 30 September 2005. The directors also confirm that

applicable accounting standards have been followed and

that the financial statements have been prepared on the

going concern basis.

The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting

records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time

the financial position of the company and the group and to

enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply

with the Companies Act 1985. They are also responsible

for safeguarding the assets of the company and of the

group, and hence for taking reasonable steps for the

prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Acquisitions

On 15 April 2005 the company acquired City North 

Group plc, an AIM listed company. A group company also

acquired a 50% stake in Grainger Geninvest LLP in June

2005. Full details of these and other minor acquisitions 

The group maintains insurance for Grainger Trust plc’s

are given in notes 11 and 26 to the accounts.

directors in respect of their duties as director.

61

Creditor payment policy

Employee involvement

It is the group’s policy to pay suppliers in accordance with

The group places considerable value on the involvement 

their normal terms and conditions of trading. Payment in

of its employees and has continued its practice of keeping

respect of the purchase of property is subject to and will

them informed on matters affecting them as employees,

comply with contractual terms. Trade creditors existing at

for example, eligibility to join company share schemes, 

30 September 2005 relating to purchases of property stock
generally complete 28 days after exchange of contracts.

and on the various factors affecting the performance 
of the group. Communication is made using the intranet,

Trade creditor days relating to other trade creditors of 

‘The Source’, and through regular meetings with, and

the company and group were calculated as 30 days 

presentations by senior management.

(2004: 30 days).

Charitable donations

Auditors

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have expressed their

During the year the group made charitable donations

willingness to continue in office as auditors to the 

amounting to £42,234 (2004: £25,455).

company and group. A resolution to reappoint them 

Health and safety

as auditors to the company will be proposed at the 

The company seeks to achieve the highest standards in

next Annual General Meeting.

respect of health and safety of employees, and the safety

Issue of shares

of tenants. Consultants are employed to ensure that the

As disclosed in Note 20 to the financial statements, 

company complies with health and safety regulations and

the company issued 5,319,374 ordinary shares during 

each year the gas supply and appliances within all of the

the year based on 5p ordinary shares, for consideration 

group’s relevant residential properties are independently

of £20,456,391.

inspected under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use)

Amended Regulations 1996 and certificates of compliance

issued. This year the group has also created and filled a

new permanent position of Health and Safety Manager.

Employment of disabled persons

The company gives full and fair consideration to applications

for employment made by disabled persons, having regard

to their particular aptitudes and abilities. In the event of an

employee becoming disabled every effort is made to ensure

that their employment within the company continues and

that appropriate training is arranged where necessary. 

It is the policy of the company that the training, career

development and promotion of disabled persons should, 

as far as possible, be identical to that of other employees.

By order of the Board

Marie Glanville

Company Secretary

20 December 2005 

62

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Independent auditors’ report to the members of Grainger Trust plc

We have audited the financial statements which comprise

We read the other information contained in the annual

the statement of accounting policies, the consolidated

report and consider the implications for our report if we

profit and loss account, the statement of group total

become aware of any apparent misstatements or material

recognised gains and losses, note of group historical cost

inconsistencies with the financial statements. The other

profits and losses, balance sheets, the consolidated cash

information comprises all sections up to and including the

flow statement, and the related notes. We have also
audited the disclosures required by Part 3 of Schedule 7A

chairman’s statement, the chief executive’s statement, the
operating and financial review, the corporate governance

to the Companies Act 1985 contained in the remuneration

report, the directors’ report, the corporate social

committee report (‘the auditable part’). 

responsibility report and the unaudited part of the

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors 

remuneration committee report. 

The directors’ responsibilities for preparing the annual

We review whether the corporate governance statement

report and the financial statements in accordance with

reflects the company’s compliance with the nine provisions

applicable United Kingdom law and accounting standards

of the 2003 FRC Combined Code specified for our review

are set out in the statement of directors’ responsibilities.

by the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority, and

The directors are also responsible for preparing the

we report if it does not. We are not required to consider

remuneration committee report. 

whether the board’s statements on internal control cover 

Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and

the auditable part of the remuneration committee report in

accordance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements

all risks and controls, or to form an opinion on the

effectiveness of the company’s or group’s corporate

governance procedures or its risk and control procedures. 

and United Kingdom Auditing Standards issued by the

The maintenance and integrity of the Grainger Trust plc

Auditing Practices board. This report, including the opinion,

website is the responsibility of the directors; the work

has been prepared for and only for the company’s

carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration

members as a body in accordance with Section 235 of the

of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no

Companies Act 1985 and for no other purpose. We do

responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to

not, in giving this opinion, accept or assume responsibility

the financial statements since they were initially presented

for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this

on the website.

report is shown or into whose hands it may come save

where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing. 

Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation

and dissemination of financial statements may differ from

We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial

legislation in other jurisdictions. 

statements give a true and fair view and whether the

financial statements and the auditable part of the

remuneration committee report have been properly

prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985. 

We also report to you if, in our opinion, the directors’

report is not consistent with the financial statements, 

if the company has not kept proper accounting records, 

if we have not received all the information and

explanations we require for our audit, or if information

specified by law regarding directors’ remuneration and

transactions is not disclosed. 

Basis of audit opinion 

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing

standards issued by the Auditing Practices board. An audit

includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to

the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and

the auditable part of the remuneration committee report. It

also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and

judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the

financial statements, and of whether the accounting policies

are appropriate to the company’s circumstances, consistently

applied and adequately disclosed. 

63

We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all

the information and explanations which we considered

necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to

give reasonable assurance that the financial statements and

the auditable part of the remuneration committee report

are free from material misstatement, whether caused by
fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion

we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation

of information in the financial statements and the auditable

part of the remuneration committee report. 

Opinion 

In our opinion: 

• the financial statements give a true and fair view of 

the state of affairs of the company and the group at

30 September 2005 and of the profit and cash flows 

of the group for the year then ended; 

• the financial statements have been properly prepared 

in accordance with the Companies Act 1985; and 

• those parts of the remuneration committee report

required by Part 3 of Schedule 7A to the Companies Act

1985 have been properly prepared in accordance with

the Companies Act 1985. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered accountants and registered auditors 

Newcastle upon Tyne 

20 December 2005 

64

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Statement of accounting policies

A summary of the principal accounting policies is set out

Joint ventures

below. The policies have been applied consistently in all

In compliance with FRS9, the group accounts for joint

material respects throughout the current and the previous year.

ventures under the gross equity method. Under this

Accounting convention

The group prepares its annual financial statements on 

the historical cost basis of accounting, as modified by the

revaluation of investment properties and in accordance

with the Companies Act 1985 and applicable UK

accounting standards.

Basis of consolidation

method, the group’s share of the Joint Venture’s turnover

and profits and losses are separately disclosed in the group’s

profit and loss account. The group’s share of the gross
assets and gross liabilities, together with goodwill, is shown

on the face of the balance sheet. The group’s statement of

total recognised gains and losses includes its share of the

Joint Venture’s total recognised gains and losses.

The group financial statements comprise the consolidated

financial statements of the company and its subsidiaries.

The financial statements of subsidiary companies are made

Repairs and improvements

Repairs are charged in the year they are incurred.

Improvement costs are capitalised.

up to 30 September.

Pensions

The results of subsidiaries sold or acquired are included 

in the consolidated profit and loss account up to, or 

Contributions to defined contribution schemes are charged to

the profit and loss account in the year to which they relate.

from, the date control passes. Intra-group sales and profits

The Bromley Property Holdings Limited group currently

are eliminated fully on consolidation. On acquisition of 

contributes to a defined benefits scheme, which was closed

a subsidiary, all of the subsidiary’s assets and liabilities 

to new members and employee contributions in 2003.

that exist at the date of acquisition are recorded at their

Funding requirements are assessed with the advice of an

provisional fair values reflecting their condition at that date.

independent qualified actuary. Actuarial valuations are

Goodwill arising on consolidation represents the difference

between the fair value of the consideration paid and the

fair value of the identifiable assets acquired. Goodwill

arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries prior to

30 September 1998 was eliminated or credited immediately

carried out every three years. The group will continue to

contribute so as to spread the cost over the expected

remaining life of the relevant employees. The transitional

disclosure requirements of FRSI7, ‘Retirement Benefits’, 

are given in note 27 to the financial statements.

against reserves and will be transferred to the profit and

Tangible fixed assets

loss account on subsequent disposal of the business to

The cost of fixed assets is their purchase cost, together

which it relates. Goodwill arising subsequent to that date 

with any incremental costs of acquisition.

is shown in the balance sheet under fixed assets. Positive

goodwill is amortised through the profit and loss account

over its estimated useful economic life. Negative goodwill 

is amortised through the profit and loss account over the

period in which the non-monetary assets are realised either

through depreciation or sale.

Turnover

In accordance with SSAP 19, (i) investment properties are

revalued annually and the aggregate surplus or temporary

deficit is transferred to a revaluation reserve, and (ii) no

depreciation or amortisation is provided in respect of freehold

investment properties and leasehold investment properties

with over 20 years to run. Permanent diminutions in value

below cost are charged in the profit and loss account. The

Turnover comprises gross sale proceeds of trading

requirement of the Companies Act 1985 is to depreciate all

properties and developments, gross rentals, commissions

properties, but that requirement conflicts with the generally

and sundry other income, and is exclusive of VAT. Sales 

accepted accounting principle set out in SSAP 19. The

of land and properties are only recognised when the cash

directors consider that to depreciate such properties would 

proceeds are received in full or the group has entered 

not give a true and fair view, as the properties are not held for

into a legally binding undertaking. Gross rentals and

consumption but for investment, and that a true and fair view

commissions are recognised as they fall due.

is given by following SSAP 19 as described above. The effect

65

of depreciation and amortisation on value is already reflected

For an interest rate swap to be treated as a hedge the

annually in the valuation of properties, and the amount

instrument must be related to actual assets or liabilities 

attributed to this factor by the valuers cannot reasonably be

or a probable commitment and must change the nature 

separately identified or quantified. Had the provisions of the

of the interest rate by converting a fixed rate to a variable

Act been followed, net assets would not have been affected

rate or vice versa. Interest differentials under these swaps

but profits would have been reduced for this and earlier years.

Investment properties are revalued every year by our in-

are recognised by adjusting net interest payable over the
periods of the contracts.

house Chartered Surveyors and the valuations are reviewed

If an instrument ceases to be accounted for as a hedge, 

and approved by the directors. The basis of valuation is

for example because the underlying hedged position is

explained in note 10 to the financial statements. 

eliminated, the instrument is marked to market and any

Depreciation is calculated so as to write off the cost of

resulting profit or loss recognised at that time.

tangible fixed assets (excluding investment properties), less

Deferred taxation

their estimated residual values, over the expected useful

Deferred tax is measured at the rate expected to apply in

economic lives of the assets concerned. The principal

the periods in which the timing differences are expected 

annual rates used for this purpose are:

to reverse, based on tax rates and laws that have been

Fixtures, fittings and equipment

%

20

Method

Straight line

Investments

Investments in subsidiaries and other investments are

included in the financial statements at cost less provisions

for permanent diminution of value.

Stocks

Tenanted residential properties are shown in the financial

statements at the lower of cost to the group and net

realisable value. Cost to the group includes legal and

enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is

measured on a non-discounted basis.

A net deferred tax asset is regarded as recoverable and

therefore recognised only when, on the basis of all evidence

available, it can be regarded as more likely than not that there

will be suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal

of the underlying timing differences can be deducted.

Deferred taxation is not recognised when fixed assets are

revalued unless by the balance sheet date there is a binding

agreement to sell the revalued assets and the gain or loss

expected to arise on the sale has been recognised in the

surveying charges incurred during acquisition together 

financial statements.

with improvement costs. Net realisable value is the net 

Share schemes

sale proceeds which the group expects on sale of a

property with vacant possession.

Development and trading properties are shown in the

financial statements at the lower of cost to the group 

and net realisable value. Cost represents the acquisition

price together with subsequent development costs net of

amounts transferred to cost of sales. Net realisable value 

is the current market value which the group expects to

receive on sale net of associated selling costs. 

Derivative financial instruments

The group operates a long-term incentive plan and a deferred

bonus scheme. In accordance with UITF17 ‘Employee share

schemes’, the costs are expensed on a straight-line basis over

the period in which performance is measured. The amount to

be expensed is based upon an estimate of the probability that

the performance criteria will be met. Shares in the company

are held by The Grainger Trust Employee Trustee Company

Limited to meet the group’s obligations under these schemes.

The assets, income and costs of this trustee company are

included in these financial statements.

The group uses derivative financial instruments to reduce

Loan issue costs

exposure to interest rate movements. The group does 

not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for
speculative purposes.

Costs incurred in raising loan finance are capitalised and 

set off against the outstanding debt in the balance sheet.
The costs are charged to profit and loss account on a

straight line basis over the term of the facility.

66

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Consolidated profit and loss account 

For the year ended 30 September 2005

Turnover (including share of joint ventures) 

Less: share of turnover of joint ventures and associates

Group turnover

Gross rentals

Trading profits

Other income

Less:

Property expenses

Administrative expenses

Operating profit – group and share of joint ventures and associates

Net profit on disposal of and provisions against fixed assets

– Group

Profit on ordinary activities before interest

Net interest payable and similar charges

– Group normal

– Group exceptional

– Joint venture

Profit on ordinary activities before taxation

Tax on profit on ordinary activities

Profit on ordinary activities after taxation 

Dividends

Retained profit for the year

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

Basic earnings per share before exceptional item

All results relate to continuing operations.

notes

1

2

3, 4

3

3

1, 5

7

8

21

9

9

9

2005
£m

226.9

(0.6)

226.3

45.5

74.8

2.9

123.2

(24.3)

(9.4)

89.5

2.1

91.6

(49.1)

–

(0.4)

(49.5)

42.1

(15.6)

26.5

(6.6)

19.9

21.2p

20.9p

21.2p

2004
£m

217.4

–

217.4

41.0

72.6

9.8

123.4

(22.7)

(7.5)

93.2

6.5

99.7

(40.1)

(5.4)

–

(45.5)

54.2

(21.2)

33.0

(5.7)

27.3

26.8p

26.7p

29.9p

Statement of group total recognised gains and losses

For the year ended 30 September 2005

Profit on ordinary activities attributable to shareholders

Taxation on realisation of property revaluation gains 

of previous years

Unrealised surplus on revaluation of properties

Total gains and losses recognised since the last annual report 

Note of group historical cost profits and losses

For the year ended 30 September 2005

Reported profit on ordinary activities before taxation

Realisation of property revaluation gains of previous years

Historical cost profit on ordinary activities before taxation

Taxation

Dividends

Retained historical cost profit for the year

67

2004
£m

33.0

(0.4)

4.3

36.9

2004
£m

54.2

5.1

59.3

(21.6)

(5.7)

32.0

2005
£m

26.5

–

5.4

31.9

2005
£m

42.1

1.6

43.7

(15.6)

(6.6)

21.5

notes

7

10, 21

notes

21

68

Balance sheets

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Group

Company

At 30 September 2005

notes

Fixed assets

Intangible assets

Tangible assets

Investments
Investments in joint ventures

Share of gross assets

Share of gross liabilities

Goodwill

Investments in associates

Current assets

Stocks

Debtors

Cash at bank and in hand

Creditors: amounts falling due 

within one year

Net current assets

Total assets less current liabilities

Creditors: amounts falling due after more 

than one year

Provisions for liabilities and charges

Net assets

Capital and reserves

Called-up equity share capital

Share premium account

Revaluation reserve

Merger reserve

Capital redemption reserve

Profit and loss account

Equity shareholders’ funds

12

10

11

11

11

14

15

16

17

17

19

20

21

21

21

21

21

22

2005
£m

(81.3)

224.4

15.4

44.7

(28.3) 

1.5

17.9

0.1

33.4

176.5

961.5

12.9

53.3

1,027.7

2004
£m

(84.8)

106.7

10.3

–

–

–

–

–

10.3

32.2

918.6

10.6

53.8

983.0

(76.2)

(109.0)

951.5

1,128.0

(895.9)
(8.5)

223.6

6.5

21.6

17.7

20.1

0.2

157.5

223.6

874.0

906.2

(717.9)
(10.4)

177.9

6.2

21.5

13.9

–

0.2

136.1

177.9

2005
£m

–

0.7

140.9

–

–

–

–

–

140.9

141.6

–

52.5

1.7

54.2

(7.6)

46.6

188.2

–
–

2004
£m

–

0.6

91.3

–

–

–

–

–

91.3

91.9

–

146.4

0.7

147.1

(71.8)

75.3

167.2

–
–

188.2

167.2

6.5

21.6

–

–

0.2

159.9

188.2

6.2

21.5

–

–

0.2

139.3

167.2

The financial statements on pages 64 to 94 were approved by the board of directors on 20 December 2005 and were

signed on their behalf by:

Rupert Dickinson

Andrew Cunningham

Director

Director

Consolidated cash flow statement

For the year ended 30 September 2005

Net cash inflow from operating activities

Returns on investments and servicing of finance

Interest received

Interest paid – normal

– exceptional

Dividends received

Taxation

UK Corporation tax paid

Capital expenditure and financial investment

Purchase of fixed asset investments

Purchase of tangible fixed assets

Sale of fixed asset investments

Sale of tangible fixed assets

Acquisitions and disposals

Purchase of subsidiaries

Costs on purchase of subsidiaries

(Overdraft)/cash acquired on purchase of subsidiaries

Investments in associates and joint ventures

Equity dividends paid

Cash outflow before financing

Financing

New loans raised

Repayment of loans

Purchase of shares

Issue of shares

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing

Decrease in cash in the year

69

2005
£m

19.3

2.2

(49.9)
–

0.1

(47.6)

2004
£m

56.7

3.3

(42.2)
(5.4)

0.2

(44.1)

(16.6)

(24.1)

(8.4)

(18.8)

–

13.3

(13.9)

(39.8)

(1.5)

(0.3)

(11.1)

(52.7)

(6.9)

(118.4)

170.0

(52.2)

–

0.1

117.9

(0.5)

(4.5)

(29.8)

1.2

41.1

8.0

(2.3)

–

0.2

–

(2.1)

(4.2)

(9.8)

726.1

(743.7)

(0.6)

0.1

(18.1)

(27.9)

notes

25

26

26

26

11

24

24

21

23, 24

70

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements

1 Segmental analysis by class of business

The analysis by class of business of the group’s turnover, profit before taxation, and net assets is set out below:

Turnover and profit before taxation

Class of business

Continuing operations

Tenanted residential

Development and trading

Joint ventures and associates

Net interest payable – group

Net interest payable – joint venture

2005
Turnover
£m

2005
Profit before
taxation
£m

2004
Turnover
£m

2004
Profit before
taxation
£m

171.4

54.9

226.3

0.6

226.9

–

–

226.9

81.2

10.4

91.6

–

91.6

(49.1)

(0.4)

42.1

157.5

59.9

217.4

–

217.4

–

–

217.4

76.1

23.6

99.7

–

99.7

(45.5)

–

54.2

The Joint Venture activities encompass both Tenanted residential and Development and trading.

Net assets

Class of business

Continuing operations

Tenanted residential

Development and trading

Net assets

Adjusted net assets*

2005
£m

2004
£m

2005
£m

2004
£m

181.8

41.8

223.6

148.0

29.9

177.9

659.1

63.2

722.3

623.6

54.7

678.3

* Adjusted net assets represent balance sheet net assets plus the excess of market value over book cost of trading stock as valued on the same basis 

as disclosed in note 10, plus the market value of other investments, net of minority interest. Adjusted net assets exclude any provision for contingent

taxation. Turnover between segments is immaterial.

Analysis by geographical area

Group turnover relates solely to operations carried out within the United Kingdom.

2 Net profit on disposal of and provisions against fixed assets

Group

Profit on disposal of investment properties

3 Net interest payable and similar charges

Group

Bank loans and overdrafts

Debentures and other loans

Other interest costs

Less:

Income from listed fixed asset investments

Interest receivable

Exceptional item:

Cost of redemption of loans and debenture stock (note 4)

Joint venture

Bank loans and overdrafts

Group and joint venture

71

2004
£m

6.5

2004
£m

38.4

2.7

2.5

43.6

(0.2)

(3.3)

40.1

5.4

45.5

–

45.5

2005
£m

2.1

2005
£m

49.3

1.5

0.8

51.6

(0.3)

(2.2)

49.1

–

49.1

0.4

49.5

All interest payable is charged to the profit and loss account. No interest has been capitalised in this or prior periods.

72

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

4 Exceptional item

Cost of early redemption of loans and debenture stock

2005
£m

–

2004
£m

5.4

The exceptional item in 2004 was paid in cash during the course of that year and represented the premium paid upon early
redemption of quoted debentures and penalties on the early repayment of loans.

5 Profit on ordinary activities before taxation

Profit on ordinary activities before taxation is stated after charging:

Depreciation of owned tangible fixed assets

Auditors’ remuneration (including expenses) 

(Company £6,000 (2004: £6,000))

Write off of goodwill on acquisition of associates 

And after crediting:

Amortisation of negative goodwill

2005
£m

0.4

0.1

0.4

5.9

Remuneration of the company’s auditors for the provision of non-audit services to the company and its UK subsidiary

undertakings was £169,000 (2004: £61,000). Of this £101,000 (2004: £34,000) related to tax advisory services, 

£54,000 related to the acquisition of City North Group plc and £14,000 to other services.

6 Directors and employees

Staff costs (including executive directors) during the year:

Wages and salaries

Social security costs

Other pension costs (see note 27)

Cost of employee share schemes

2005
£m

8.6

1.1

0.7

0.6

11.0

The average weekly number of persons employed by the group during the year (including executive directors) was 188

(2004: 164). All employees were involved in the management and/or administration of the group. Details of directors’

remuneration (including pensions), directors’ share options and interests in the long-term incentive plan are provided 

in the remuneration committee report on pages 56 to 58.

The company contributed to defined contribution schemes for three directors during the year (2004: three directors).

2004
£m

0.4

0.1

–

7.6

2004
£m

7.5

1.1

0.9

1.3

10.8

73

2005
£m

2004
£m

17.9

–

–

17.9

0.7

(3.0)

(2.3)

15.6

20.8

(0.6)

(0.4)

19.8

1.4

–

1.4

21.2

2004
£m

54.2

16.3

0.6

(2.3)

7.2

(0.5)

(0.9)

(0.6)

19.8

7 Taxation

Analysis of charge in year

Current tax:

Group
UK corporation tax on profits for the period

Adjustments in respect of prior periods

Transferred to appropriate reserve (see below)

Total current tax

Deferred tax:

Origination and reversal of timing differences

Group

Adjustments in respect of prior periods

Total deferred tax

Tax on profit on ordinary activities

The group allocates the tax arising on the sale of investment properties between the profit and loss account and the

appropriate reserve to match the accounting treatment of the gain arising. Tax attributable to the exceptional interest

charges in 2004 was a credit of £1.6m.

Factors affecting the tax charge for the year

The tax assessed for the year is higher than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK (30%).

The differences are explained below:

Profit on ordinary activities before tax

Profit on ordinary activities before tax at a rate of 30%

Expenses not deductible for tax purposes

Effect of negative goodwill written back

Tax on fair values released on sales

Effect of timing differences

Difference between tax and accounting profit on disposals

Adjustments in respect of prior periods

Total current tax

Factors that may affect future tax charges

2005
£m

42.1

12.6

0.4

(1.8)

7.4

(0.7)

–

–

17.9

No provisions for deferred tax have been made on gains which would become payable if the group’s investment properties

were sold at their year end values. The estimate of unprovided deferred tax is £23.6m (2004: £15.9m).

74

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

7 Taxation continued

FRS19 prohibits the making of provisions for contingent tax liabilities on the fair value of properties on the acquisition of

companies. It had previously been industry practice to make partial provision for such liabilities as part of the fair value

exercise on acquisition. Thus there is a greater tax charge on property sales where there is no brought forward contingent

tax provision available to be utilised in its reduction. 

The total contingent tax to the group on the difference between original cost and carrying value of trading properties 

not provided at 30 September 2005 is £76.9m (2004: £83.3m).

8 Dividends

Dividends on equity shares:

Ordinary – interim paid of 1.7p per share (2004: 0.81p per share)

Ordinary – final proposed of 3.41p per share (2004: 3.84p per share)

2005
£m

2.2

4.4

6.6

2004
£m

1.0

4.7

5.7

9 Earnings per share

The calculation of basic, diluted and adjusted earnings per share is based on the following earnings and number of shares:

Year ended 30 September 2005

Year ended 30 September 2004

Profit
for the 
year
£m

26.5

–

26.5

Weighted
average
number 
of shares
(thousands)

125,077

–

125,077

Earnings
per share
pence

21.2

–

21.2

Profit
for the
year
£m

33.0

3.8

36.8

Weighted
average
number 
of shares
(thousands)

122,815

–

122,815

Earnings
per share
pence

26.8

3.1

29.9

Basic earnings per share 
Profit attributable to shareholders

Exceptional item (note 4) less tax

Adjusted earnings 

Effect of dilutive securities 

Options and shares

–

1,770

(0.3)

–

720

(0.1)

Diluted earnings per share

Profit attributable to shareholders

26.5

126,847

Exceptional item (note 4) less tax

–

–

Adjusted earnings 

26.5

126,847

20.9

–

20.9

33.0

3.8

36.8

123,535

–

123,535

26.7

3.1

29.8

The adjusted earnings per share is presented as, in the opinion of the directors, it gives a better picture of the underlying

performance of the business.

The company completed a five for one share split on 25 February 2005. As such, the weighted average number of shares

and earnings per share above, including the comparatives which have been restated, are based on 5p ordinary shares

rather than 25p ordinary shares.

10 Tangible fixed assets

Cost or valuation
At 1 October 2004

Surplus on revaluation

Acquisition of subsidiary

Additions

Disposals

Transfers to investment in joint ventures

At 30 September 2005

Depreciation

At 1 October 2004

Charge for year

Released on disposals

At 30 September 2005

Net book value

At 30 September 2005

At 30 September 2004

75

Company
fixtures,
fittings and
equipment
£m

1.2

–

–

0.3

–

–

1.5

0.6

0.2

–

0.8

0.7

0.6

Total
£m

107.6

5.4

110.8

18.8

(11.9)

(5.0)

225.7

0.9

0.4

–

1.3

224.4

106.7

Investment
properties
£m

Group
fixtures,
fittings and
equipment
£m

105.4

5.4

110.8

17.8

(11.9)

(5.0)

222.5

–

–

–

–

222.5

105.4

2.2

–

–

1.0

–

–

3.2

0.9

0.4

–

1.3

1.9

1.3

Group investment properties were revalued at their open market value at 30 September 2005 by our in-house Chartered

Surveyors and the valuations were reviewed and approved by the directors. A structured sample of the in-house valuations

has also been reviewed by Allsop & Co., Chartered Surveyors, independent of the company. Based on the results of that

review, Allsop & Co. have concluded that they have a high degree of confidence in those valuations. These represent

estimates of the open market value of the properties subject to the tenancies then existing. 

The net book value of investment properties comprises:

Freehold

Long leasehold

Net book value

Group

2005
£m

211.7

10.8

222.5

If investment properties had not been revalued, they would have been included at the following amounts:

Net book value

Group

2005
£m

214.3

2004
£m

97.7

7.7

105.4

2004
£m

101.0

76

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

11 Fixed asset investments

Group

Investment
in joint 
ventures
£m

Investment
in
associates
£m

Other
investments
£m

Cost

At 1 October 2004

Additions – net assets

– goodwill

Transfers

Transferred from investment properties

Write off of investment

Share of losses

At 30 September 2005

–

8.5

1.5

3.3

5.0

–

(0.4)

17.9

–

1.1

–

–

–

(0.9)

(0.1)

0.1

10.3

8.4

–

(3.3)

–

–

–

Company

Investment 
in
subsidiaries
£m

Other
investments
£m

84.3

41.2

–

–

–

–

7.0

8.4

–

–

–

–

Total
£m

10.3

18.0

1.5

–

5.0

(0.9)

(0.5)

Total
£m

91.3

49.6

–

–

–

–

15.4

33.4

125.5

15.4

140.9

Additions to the company investment in subsidiaries of £41.2m is net of the premium on the shares issued to acquire 

City North Group plc of £20.1m (see note 21).

Investments in joint ventures relate to an £8.8m investment in Grainger Geninvest LLP in which the group holds a 50%

stake, a £5.0m investment in a joint venture with Grange (Prescot Street) Limited in which the group holds a 50% stake

and a £4.1m investment in a limited partnership, Regen (NT) LLP to develop Smith Docks in North Tyneside in which the
group holds a 331⁄3% stake.

Investments at net book value include:

Investments listed on a recognised stock exchange
Aggregate market value of listed investments

Group
other investments

2005
£m

15.4
18.2

2004
£m

7.0
9.7

The directors consider that providing details of all subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates as at 30 September 2005

would result in disclosure of excessive length. The following information relates to those subsidiary undertakings whose

results or financial position, in the opinion of the directors, principally affected the figures of the group. A full list will be

appended to the next Annual Return.

77

11 Fixed asset investments continued

Name of undertaking

Northumberland Property & Durham Trust Limited

GIP Limited 
N & D London Limited

Grainger Residential Management Limited

City North Group plc

Derwent Developments Limited

BPT (Bradford Property Trust) Limited

BPT (Assured Homes) Limited

BPT (Residential Investments) Limited

Bromley Property Investments Limited

Home Properties Limited

Grainger Homes Limited

Proportion of nominal value of
ordinary issued shares held by:

Group %

Company %

100

100
100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

–

–
–

100

100

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Activity

Property trading

Property trading & investment 
Property management

Property management

Property investment

Land development

Property trading

Property investment

Property investment

Finance company

Property trading

House-building

All subsidiaries are consolidated in the group accounts, and all subsidiaries whose results materially affect the figures of the

group are incorporated in England and Wales and operate within the United Kingdom.

12 Intangible assets

Cost

At 1 October 2004
Additions

At 30 September 2005

Amortisation

At 1 October 2004 

Amortisation for year

At 30 September 2005

Net book value

At 30 September 2005

At 30 September 2004

Positive
goodwill
£m

Group

Negative
goodwill
£m

0.3
–

0.3

–

–

–

0.3

0.3

(94.0)
(2.4)

(96.4)

8.9

5.9

14.8

(81.6)

(85.1)

Total
£m

(93.7)
(2.4)

(96.1)

8.9

5.9

14.8

(81.3)

(84.8)

The goodwill and negative goodwill arising on acquisitions are being amortised in line with the disposal of acquired assets.
Negative goodwill arising in the year of £2.4m relates to the acquisition of City North Group plc (see note 26). £5.3m of 
the amortisation in the year was recognised within trading profits and £0.6m within profit on disposal of fixed assets.

78

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

13 Capital commitments

The group had capital commitments contracted but not provided for of £nil at 30 September 2005 (2004: £nil).

14 Stocks

Trading and development properties

2005
£m

961.5

Group

2004
£m

918.6

The market value of the group’s trading and development properties is £1,374.7m (2004: £1,332.5m), as valued on the

same basis as disclosed in note 10 for investment properties.

15 Debtors

Trade debtors

Amounts owed by group undertakings

Other debtors

Prepayments and accrued income

Deferred tax asset (see note 19)

Group

Company

2005
£m

1.9

–

4.8

3.8

2.4

12.9

2004
£m

5.8

–

0.5

2.9

1.4

10.6

2005
£m

–

49.4

0.4

2.7

–

52.5

2004
£m

–

145.0

–

1.4

–

146.4

16 Cash at bank and in hand

At 30 September 2005, bank balances included £25.4m (2004: £30.4m) which is held by lenders awaiting substitution 

of alternative security, represents deposits received or is held as a guarantee for loan note obligations.

79

17 Creditors 

Group

Company

Amounts falling due within one year:

Loan notes
Deposits received

Trade creditors

Amounts owed to group undertakings

Corporation tax payable

Other taxation and social security

Accruals and deferred income

Dividends payable

Amounts falling due after more than one year:

Bank loans

Other creditors

2005
£m

26.4
1.1

6.7

–

22.0

1.5

14.1

4.4

76.2

2005
£m

887.9

8.0

895.9

2004
£m

31.8
0.8

22.2

–

20.5

3.2

25.8

4.7

109.0

2004
£m

717.9

–

717.9

Group

2005
£m

1.3
–

0.4

–

1.0

–

0.5

4.4

7.6

2005
£m

–

–

–

2004
£m

1.6
–

–

55.1

–

–

10.4

4.7

71.8

2004
£m

–

–

–

Company

Other creditors of £8.0m represents deferred consideration for the purchase of land at West Waterlooville. It is payable 

in two equal instalments in April 2009 and 2013 respectively.

Maturity of finance debt (net of issue costs) is as follows:

In one year or less

Between two and five years

Between five and ten years

Over ten years

Group

Company

2005
£m

26.4

644.8

201.2

41.9

914.3

2004
£m

31.8

475.2

199.1

43.6

749.7

2005
£m

1.3

–

–

–

1.3

2004
£m

1.6

–

–

–

1.6

Bank loans bear interest at rates between 0.9% and 1.0% above LIBOR and are secured by fixed and floating charges over

the assets of the group. Repayments are over terms of four to 27 years. Unutilised borrowing facilities of £450m out of a

total of £460m at the year end (see note 18) bear interest at rates 0.7% above LIBOR.

Loan notes carry interest at 0.75% and 1.00% below LIBOR and are payable half-yearly/quarterly or on demand. Final

redemption is at par on 30 September 2009 and 30 April 2011.

80

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

18 Financial instruments

The group’s policies relative to financial instruments are set out in the operating and financial review on page 32. 

All amounts are held in pounds sterling. Short-term debtors and creditors have been excluded from these disclosures 

as they do not have a significant impact on the financial risk profile of the group.

Interest rate risk profile of financial liabilities.

Loan notes

Bank debt

Total

Loan notes

Bank debt

Total

2005

Fixed rate
liabilities
£m

Capped rate
liabilities
£m

Floating rate
liabilities
£m

–

45.1

45.1

26.4

237.5

263.9

–

612.5

612.5

2004

Fixed rate
liabilities
£m

Capped rate
liabilities
£m

Floating rate
liabilities
£m

–

45.0

45.0

–

456.1

456.1

31.8

223.9

255.7

Total
£m

26.4

895.1

921.5

Total
£m

31.8

725.0

756.8

The interest rate profile shown above takes into account the various derivative instruments used to manage interest rate

fluctuations and is gross of issue costs.

Borrowings subject to caps, collars and swaps are included in capped rate liabilities. 

Hedge profile

Bank debt

Hedge profile

Bank debt

Fixed rate
weighted
average 
rate
%

2005

Weighted
average 
period
years

Capped rate
weighted
average 
rate
%

Weighted
average 
period
years

6.3

19

6.0

4

Fixed rate
weighted
average 
rate
%

2004

Weighted
average 
period
years

Capped rate
weighted
average 
rate
%

Weighted
average 
period
years

6.3

20

6.1

3

The fixed and capped rates are inclusive of loan margins and reflect the effective cost of finance after taking account 

of the effect of interest rate swaps.

81

18 Financial instruments continued

Financial assets

The group’s financial assets at the year end consist of cash at bank and in hand of £53.3m (2004: £53.8m). The interest

rate on this is floating.

Borrowing facilities
The group had unutilised borrowing facilities at the year end amounting to £460m (2004: £230m), of which £10m expires

on 30 September 2006 and £450m expires on 23 June 2009 (2004: £10m expired on 30 September 2005 and £220m

expires on 23 June 2009).

Fair values of financial liabilities

The following fair values represent the amounts at which the financial instruments could be exchanged on an arm’s length

transaction between informed and willing parties, and exclude accrued interest.

Book
value
£m

45.1

869.2

–

–

–

–

–

–

2005

Fair
value
£m

49.7

869.2

11.2

1.4

–

12.6

0.9

13.5

914.3

932.4

(53.3)

861.0

(53.3)

879.1

Financial instruments:

Fixed rate bank debt

Debt fixed under one year

Derivative financial instruments:

Interest rate swaps

Interest rate caps

Interest rate collars

Total current derivatives

Future interest rate swaps

Total derivatives

Financial assets:

Cash

Less amount provided (see note 19)

Fair 
value
adjustment
£m

(4.6)

–

(11.2)

(1.4)

–

(12.6)

(0.9)

(13.5)

(18.1)

–

(18.1)

2.9

(15.2)

Book
value
£m

42.5

707.2

–

–

–

–

–

–

2004

Fair
value
£m

43.8

707.2

2.1

(0.1)

(0.1)

1.9

1.9

3.8

749.7

754.8

(53.8)

695.9

(53.8)

701.0

Fair
value
adjustment
£m

(1.3)

–

(2.1)

0.1

0.1

(1.9)

(1.9)

(3.8)

(5.1)

0.0

(5.1)

4.6

(0.5)

The fair values were calculated at 30 September 2005 using interest rates and market prices prevailing at that date and

reflect the replacement values of the respective financial instruments. After deduction of provisions, this has an after tax

effect on NAV of 8p (2004: 0p).

Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are only recognised when the position matures or terminates.

The fair value of all remaining financial assets and liabilities is equal to their book values.

82

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

18 Financial instruments continued

An analysis of the unrecognised gains and losses arising on financial instruments used as hedges is as follows:

Gains/(losses) on hedges at 1 October 2004

Losses arising in previous periods that were recognised during the year

Gains/(losses) not recognised in the year to 30 September 2005:

Arising before 1 October 2004

Arising during the year to 30 September 2005

Unrecognised gains/(losses) on hedges at 30 September 2005

Of which:

Losses expected to be recognised in the year to 30 September 2006

Losses expected to be recognised in the year to 30 September 2007 or later

19 Provisions for liabilities and charges

Cost at 1 October 2004

Credited to profit and loss account

At 30 September 2005

Gains
£m

0.3

–

0.3

(0.3)

–

–

–

Losses
£m

(4.1)

1.5

(2.6)

(10.9)

(13.5)

(2.7)

(10.8)

Provision for 
retirement 
liabilities
£m

5.8

(0.2)

5.6

Group
Provision for
fair value of
financial
instruments
£m

4.6

(1.7)

2.9

Net total
£m

(3.8)

1.5

(2.3)

(11.2)

(13.5)

(2.7)

(10.8)

Total
£m

10.4

(1.9)

8.5

The provision for retirement liabilities reflects an estimate for the amount required to meet a shortfall in retirement liabilities

within Bromley at the date of acquisition and is being amortised over the expected remaining service lives of relevant employees.

The provision for fair value of financial instruments reflects the mark to market adjustment calculated on the financial instruments

of Bromley at the date of acquisition and is being amortised over the maturity periods of those financial instruments.

83

19 Provisions for liabilities and charges continued

Deferred taxation

Amount provided

Amount unprovided

Group

Tax effect of timing differences due to:

Accelerated capital allowances

Net short-term timing differences

Held over gains in stock arising from transfers from fixed assets

Revalued investment properties

Transferred to debtors (see note 15)

Balance at 30 September 2005

2005
£m

2004
£m

1.4

(3.8)

–

–

2.4

–

0.1

(4.3)

2.8

–

1.4

–

2005
£m

–

–

–

23.6

–

23.6

Group

The movements on the provisions for deferred taxation are as follows:

1 October 2004 (included within debtors)

Amount credited to profit and loss account

Acquisition of subsidiary

Transferred to debtors (see note 15)

Balance at 30 September 2005

The company has no liability, potential or otherwise, to deferred taxation.

The group does not provide deferred tax on revalued investment properties, in line with FRS19 ‘Deferred taxation’, 

as there is no binding agreement to sell the revalued investment properties as at the balance sheet date.

In addition to the above, the total contingent tax to the group on the difference between original cost and carrying 

value of trading properties not provided at 30 September 2005 is £76.9m (2004: £83.3m).

2004
£m

–

–

–

15.9

–

15.9

£m

(1.4)

(2.3)

1.3

2.4

–

84

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

20 Called-up equity share capital

Company and group

Authorised:

160,000,000 (2004: 160,000,000) ordinary shares of 5p each

Allotted, called-up and fully paid:

129,374,394 (2004: 124,055,020) ordinary shares of 5p each

Shares issued during the year:

Purchase of subsidiary

Executive share option scheme

SAYE scheme at 93.2p

SAYE scheme at 163.6p

SAYE scheme at 186.4p

SAYE scheme at 271.8p

Share split

2005
£m

2004
£m

8.0

6.5

8.0 

6.2 

Number

Nominal value
£’000

Consideration
£’000

5,189,893

260

20,347

89,925

5,765

32,955

197

639

4

–

2

–

–

50

5

52

–

2

5,319,374

266

20,456

The company completed a five for one share split on 25 February 2005. As such, all shares and prices per share are based

on 5p ordinary shares rather than 25p ordinary shares.

85

20 Called-up share capital continued

Potential issues of ordinary shares

Certain senior executives hold options to subscribe for shares in the company under executive share option schemes at

prices ranging from 53.4p to 381.8p. In addition, the company operates a SAYE share option scheme for employees. Under

this scheme, employees hold options to subscribe for shares in the company at prices ranging from 138.0p to 334.0p.
Under these various schemes, options on 129,481 shares were exercised in the year and options on 137,459 shares lapsed.

The number of shares subject to options, the periods in which they were granted and the periods in which they may be

exercised are given below:

Year of grant

Executive share options

1994

1996

1997

2003

2004

2005

SAYE share options

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Exercise price
(pence)

Exercise
period

2005
Number

2004
Number

68.5

53.4

191.8

326.4

381.8

93.2

138.0

163.6

186.4

271.8

334.0

1999-06

2000-07

2006-13

2007-14

2008-15

2003-06

2004-07

2005-08

2006-09

2007-10

2008-11

43,795

100,720

787,410

564,225

563,955

–

95,160

139,280

847,530

625,495

–

2,060,105

1,707,465

–

26,895

66,745

95,425

102,850

47,358

339,273

5,765

26,895

110,395

96,510

107,975

–

347,540

Total share options

2,399,378

2,055,005

The number of share options and the exercise prices shown above are based on 5p ordinary shares including the

comparatives which have been restated accordingly.

86

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

21 Reserves

Group

At 1 October 2004
Issue of shares

Investment properties:

Surplus on revaluation

Realisation on disposals

Movement in own shares

Retained profit for the year

At 30 September 2005

Share premium
account
£m

Merger
reserve
£m

Revaluation
reserve
£m

Capital
redemption
reserve
£m

Profit and
loss account
£m

21.5
0.1

–

–

–

–

–
20.1

–

–

–

–

21.6

20.1

13.9
–

5.4

(1.6)

–

–

17.7

0.2
–

–

–

–

–

136.1
–

–

1.6

(0.1)

19.9

0.2

157.5

The company issued 5,189,893 ordinary shares in partial consideration for the acquisition of City North Group plc. The

issue satisfied the provisions of Section 131 of the companies Act 1985. In the consolidated accounts, the premium relating

to these shares, of £20.1m, has been credited to a merger reserve. In the company accounts, the cost of investment in City

North Group plc has been reduced by £20.1m and the premium on the shares has been disregarded.

Company

At 1 October 2004

Issue of shares

Retained profit for the year

At 30 September 2005

Share premium
account
£m

Capital
redemption
reserve
£m

Profit and
loss account
£m

21.5

0.1

–

21.6

0.2

–

–

0.2

139.3

–

20.6

159.9

The group financial statements do not include a separate profit and loss account for the company as permitted under

section 230 of the Companies Act 1985. The amount of group profit after taxation dealt with in the financial statements 

of the parent company is £1.5m (2004: £7.3m). Included within the company’s profit and loss account balance of 

£159.9m is a total of £60.5m which is non-distributable as the profit arose on a transfer of assets between group

companies (2004: £60.5m). 

The Grainger Trust Employee Trustee Company Limited holds 1,164,380 (2004: 1,192,710) shares with a cost of £2.3m

(2004: £2.3m) and an open market value at 30 September 2005 of £5.3m (2004: £4.4m). These shares were acquired at

various dates in the open market. The trustee company uses funds provided by the group to meet the group’s obligations

under its long-term incentive scheme. These shares are retained until awarded to employees by the trustee company in

accordance with the wishes of the company.

22 Reconciliation of movements in equity shareholders’ funds 

Profit for the financial year

Dividends

Other recognised gains and losses for the year

Movement in own shares

Proceeds from ordinary shares issued for cash

Nominal value of ordinary shares issued to acquire City North Group plc

Premium on ordinary shares issued to acquire City North Group plc

Net additions to equity shareholders’ funds

Opening equity shareholders’ funds

Closing equity shareholders’ funds

23 Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt

Decrease in cash

Cash (inflow)/outflow from (increase)/decrease in debt

Change in net debt resulting from cash flows

Other non-cash items:

Loans acquired with subsidiary

Others

Movement in net debt for the year

Net debt at 1 October 2004

Net debt at 30 September 2005

87

2004
£m

33.0

(5.7)

27.3

3.9

(0.1)

0.1

–

–

31.2

146.7

177.9

2004
£m

(27.9)

17.6

(10.3)

–

(6.1)

(16.4)

(679.5)

(695.9)

2005
£m

26.5

(6.6)

19.9

5.4

(0.1)

0.1

0.3

20.1

45.7

177.9

223.6

2005
£m

(0.5)

(117.8)

(118.3)

(44.0)

(2.8)

(165.1)

(695.9)

(861.0)

88

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

24 Analysis of net debt

Cash at bank and in hand

Debt due within one year
Debt due after one year

Total

At 1 Oct
2004
£m

53.8

(31.8)
(717.9)

(695.9)

(0.5)

52.2
(170.0)

(118.3)

–

(44.0)
–

(44.0)

Cash flow
£m

On purchase
of subsidiary
£m

Other non
cash changes
£m

At 30 Sept
2005
£m

25 Reconciliation of group operating profit to net cash inflow from operating activities

Operating profit

Depreciation

Movement in provisions for liabilities and charges

Provision against investment

Amortisation of goodwill

Decrease/(increase) in debtors

(Decrease)/increase in creditors

Increase in stocks

Net cash inflow from operating activities

–

(2.8)
–

(2.8)

2005
£m

89.5

0.4

(0.2)

0.9

(5.3)

0.9

(24.3)

(42.6)

19.3

53.3

(26.4)
(887.9)

(861.0)

2004
£m

93.2

0.4

(0.2)

–

(6.1)

(2.0)

1.7

(30.3)

56.7

89

26 Acquisitions

a) Acquisition of City North Group plc

The group purchased 100% of the share capital of City North Group plc on 15 April 2005. The total consideration 

of £61.3m was satisfied by shares issued of £20.4m and cash of £40.9m.

The purchase has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.

The aggregate assets and liabilities acquired, and their fair values, were:

Investment properties

Other fixed assets

Debtors

Creditors

Bank overdraft

Bank loans

Deferred taxation

Net assets acquired

Negative goodwill

Consideration

Consideration satisfied by:

Shares issued

Cash (including costs on acquisition of £1.5m)

Book value
£m

Revaluations
£m

Other
£m

111.4

0.8

0.2

(2.6)

(0.3)

(44.0)

(1.3)

64.2

(0.6)

(0.8)

0.9

(1.4)

0.9

Fair value
£m

110.8

0.0

1.1

(2.6)

(0.3)

(44.0)

(1.3)

63.7

(2.4)

61.3

20.4

40.9

61.3

The book value of the assets and liabilities have been taken from the management accounts of City North Group plc 

as at 15 April 2005.

Investment properties were valued by the directors as at 15 April 2005. 

Other fixed assets have been written off as there was no fixed asset register to support their existence or carrying value.

The other adjustment relates to the exercise of options by City North Group plc management. This was triggered by the

acquisition by Grainger and the amount received has been set up as a debtor on acquisition.

The post acquisition results and cash flows of City North Group plc are not considered material by the directors and

therefore have not been disclosed separately in the profit and loss account or cash flow statement.

90

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

26 Acquisitions continued

From the date of acquisition to 30 September 2005 City North Group plc contributed the following to group results:

Turnover

Profit on ordinary activities after taxation
Increase in cash in the period

b) Other acquisition

£m

2.7

0.9
5.4

The group purchased 100% of the share capital of Holdfield Limited on 18 October 2004. Fair value adjustments of £0.3m

were made to revalue trading stock acquired to market value.

Book value of net assets acquired

Fair value adjustments

Consideration satisfied by cash

27 Pension schemes

£m

0.1

0.3

0.4

The group operates a defined contribution pension scheme for its employees. The assets of the scheme are held separately

from those of the group in independently administered funds. Pension arrangements for executive directors are disclosed in

the remuneration committee report. The pension cost charge in these financial statements represents contributions payable

by the group (see note 6).

At the start of the financial year, BPT Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bromley, was contributing to two pension

schemes. The first was a defined contribution scheme, implemented in 2003 and open to all employees. During the year,

the employees were transferred to Grainger Limited and all pension contributions were made into the Grainger Limited

defined contribution scheme instead of the BPT scheme. The second is a defined benefit scheme, which was closed to new

members and employee contributions during 2003. The group will continue to contribute to this scheme so as to spread

the cost over the expected remaining service lives of the relevant employees.

BPT Defined benefit scheme

The assets of the BPT defined benefit scheme are held separately from those of the group in funds administered by trustees

and are invested with an independent investment manager. Costs and funding are assessed with the advice of an

independent qualified actuary using the attained age method.

Actuarial valuations are carried out every three years. The last full actuarial valuation was undertaken as at 1 July 2004.

Based on actuarial assumptions of an investment return of 6.5% per annum and salary increases of 5% per annum, the

assets were valued at £10.5m. These were held in a relevant insurance contract. These assets represented 79% of the 

value of the scheme’s accrued liabilities. The actuary has recommended an employer contribution rate of 28.5% in order 

to eliminate the deficiency over the expected future working lifetimes of the members. 

91

27 Pension schemes continued

The actuary also undertook a Minimum Funding Requirement valuation as at 1 July 2004 in accordance with the Pensions

Act 1995. The value of the assets of the scheme was determined at 101% of the liabilities of the scheme.

FRS17 transitional disclosures

The FRS17 calculations for disclosure purposes have been based on a valuation at 1 July 2004 adjusted to 30 September
2005 and adjusted to the projected unit method by a qualified independent actuary. The major assumptions used by the

actuary were:

Discount rate

Rate of increase in pensionable salaries

Rate of increase in pensions in payment

Inflation assumption

30 September
2005

30 September 
2004

30 September 
2003

5.00% pa

3.90% pa

5.00% pa

2.90% pa

5.50% pa

4.00% pa

5.00% pa

3.00% pa

5.30% pa

3.70% pa

5.00% pa

2.70% pa

The assets are held with AXA Sun Life in a managed fund.

The breakdown of the assets and the associated expected rate of return is given in the table below: 

Equities

Bonds

Other

AXA Sun Life with-profits fund

Total value of assets

30 September 2005

30 September 2004

30 September 2003

Expected
rate of
return (pa)

6.8%

4.7%

6.8%

–

Value
(£m)

4.9

6.9

0.3

–

12.1

Expected
rate of
return (pa)

7.3%

5.2%

5.0%

–

Value
(£m)

4.0

6.2

0.5

–

10.7

Expected
rate of
return (pa)

–

–

–

6.3%

Value
(£m)

–

–

–

10.5

10.5

The following approximate amounts were measured in accordance with the requirements of FRS17:

Total market value of assets 

Present value of scheme liabilities

Deficit in the scheme
Related deferred tax assets

Net pension liability

30 September
2005
£m

30 September
2004
£m

30 September
2003
£m

12.1

(17.4)

(5.3)
1.6

(3.7)

10.7

(15.3)

(4.6)
1.4

(3.2)

10.5

(14.2)

(3.7)
1.1

(2.6)

92

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

27 Pension schemes continued

If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, the net assets and profit and loss reserve would 

be as follows:

Net assets excluding SSAP24 pension liability

FRS17 pension liability

Net assets including FRS17 pension liability

Profit and loss reserve excluding SSAP24 pension liability

FRS17 pension reserve

Profit and loss reserve

30 September 
2005
£m

30 September 
2004
£m

30 September 
2003
£m

225.6

(1.9)

223.7

159.5

(1.9)

157.6

179.9

(1.6)

178.3

138.1

(1.6)

136.5

148.9

(1.3)

147.6

109.3

(1.3)

108.0

The following amounts would have been recognised in the group’s performance statements in the year to 30 September

2005, under the requirements of FRS17:

Operating profit

Current service cost

Past service cost

Total operating charge

Other finance income/(expense)

Interest on pension scheme liabilities

Expected return on pension scheme assets

Net finance expense

Statement of total recognised gains and losses (STRGL)

Actual return less expected return on pension scheme assets

Experience gains and losses arising on the scheme liabilities

Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of scheme liabilities

Actuarial loss recognised in STRGL

Year ended
30 September 
2005
£m

Year ended
30 September
2004
£m

–

–

–

(0.8)

0.6

(0.2)

1.1

0.6

(2.4)

(0.7)

–

–

–

(0.8)

0.7

(0.1)

(0.9)

(0.5)

–

(1.4)

27 Pension schemes continued

Movements in deficit for the year to 30 September 2005 

Deficit in scheme at beginning of the year

Current service cost

Past service gain

Contributions

Other finance income

Actuarial loss

Deficit in scheme at end of year

93

Year ended
30 September 
2005
£m

Year ended
30 September
2004
£m

(4.6)

–

–

0.2

(0.2)

(0.7)

(5.3)

(3.7)

–

–

0.6

(0.1)

(1.4)

(4.6)

Details of experience gains and losses for the year to 30 September 2005

Year ended
30 September 
2005
£m

Year ended
30 September
2004
£m

Year ended
30 September
2003
£m

1. Difference between the expected and actual return on scheme assets:

Amount

Percentage of scheme assets

2. Experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities:

Amount

Percentage of the present value of the scheme liabilities

3. Total amount recognised in statement of total recognised gains and losses:

Amount

Percentage of the present value of the scheme liabilities

1.1

9.1%

0.6

3.4%

(0.7)

(4.0%)

(0.9)

(8.4%)

(0.5)

(3.3%)

(1.4)

(9.2%)

(0.3)

(2.9%)

0.1

0.1%

(1.3)

(9.2%)

94
94

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Notes to the financial statements continued

28 Contingent liabilities

The company, in conjunction with certain other group companies, has guaranteed bank loans and other loans of subsidiary

companies amounting at 30 September 2005 to £850m (2004: £680m).

In addition, the group has an obligation, under the sale and purchase agreement for the land at West Waterlooville, 

to pay further consideration should the site value exceed certain pre-agreed amounts. It is not possible to determine the
amount or timing of any such future payments due to the long-term nature of the site’s development and the associated

uncertainties with respect to planning applications. However, any future payments will not fall due until at least 2015 and

will be spread over a number of years.

29 Operating leases

The group has operating leases relating primarily to certain office premises occupied by group personnel and cars leased

under contract hire agreements. Future commitments are not disclosed, as in the opinion of the directors, the amounts

involved are not material.

30 Related party transactions

In accordance with the provisions of FRS8 ‘Related Party Disclosures’, details of transactions with subsidiary undertakings

are not disclosed. There are no other related party transactions in addition to those already disclosed in the financial

statements.

31 Post balance sheet events

Since the year end the group has exchanged on a portfolio acquisition of 1,400 properties in the Metro Ruhr of Germany
for a consideration of €71.5m (£48.9m). Completion is expected before 31 December 2005.

32 Major non-cash transactions

i) Part of the consideration for the acquisition of City North Group plc comprised shares. Further details are set out in 

note 26. 

ii) The company acquired £12.3m of residential properties, the consideration for which was by way of Grainger transferring 

to the vendor certain commercial properties.

95

Five-year record for the year ended 30 September 2005

Turnover**

Gross rentals

Sales of investment properties

Trading profits
Profit before taxation**

Profit after taxation and minority interests**

Dividends paid

Earnings**

Dividends

Fixed assets and stocks on a financial 

statement basis

Fixed assets and stocks at market value***

Share capital and reserves

2001
£m

124.7

23.2

40.0

26.5
21.1

12.9

3.0

2002
£m

213.8

22.0

7.1

33.7
44.9

23.5

3.5

2003
£m

173.6

21.4

2.1

38.8
48.5

29.3

4.0

2004
£m

217.4

41.0

41.1

72.6
54.2

36.8

5.7

2005
£m

226.9

45.5

13.3

74.8
42.1

26.5

6.6

Pence
per share

Pence
per share

Pence 
per share

Pence
per share

Pence
per share

10.58

2.47

£m

315.1

554.9

94.8

19.28

2.84

£m

372.8

680.3

119.2

23.96

3.26

£m

29.94

4.65

£m

21.20

5.11

£m

907.2

1,305.8

950.8

1,454.5

1,138.0

1,639.3

146.7

177.9

223.6

Pence
per share

Pence
per share

Pence 
per share

Net asset value on financial statements basis

76.8

96.4

118.4

Net asset value including fixed assets and stocks 

at replacement value*

271.2***

344.8***

438.8

Dividend cover**

Gearing
Share price at 30 September

4.3x

60%
151.5p

6.7x

52%
198.5p

7.3x

125%
273.0p

Pence
per share

143.4

546.8

6.5x

103%
367.0p

Pence
per share

172.8

558.3

4.0x

120%
456.0p

Figures for 2000 and 2001 are restated, where relevant, to take account of FRS19. 

Figures for 2000 to 2003 are restated, where relevant, to take account of UITF 38. 

Earnings are restated to reflect ESOP shares held by the group. 

Share price and per share figures have been restated across all five years to take 

account of the five for one share split that took place in February 2005. 

In addition:

* Corporation tax has not been provided on valuation surpluses relating to stocks.

** Excluding exceptional items and including share of Joint venture.

*** 2001 and 2002 includes share of the market value of Joint venture properties and negative goodwill write back.

96

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Shareholders’ information

Financial calendar

Share dealing service

Annual general meeting 2 March 2006

A share dealing service is available to existing shareholders

Payment of 2005 final dividend 8 March 2006

to buy or sell the company’s shares via Capita Share

Announcement of 2006 interim results June 2006

Dealing Services. Online and telephone dealing facilities

Payment of 2006 interim dividend July 2006

provide an easy to access and simple to use service.

Announcement of 2006 final results December 2006

For further information on this service, or to buy or sell

Share price

During the year ended 30 September 2005, the range of

mid market prices of the company’s ordinary shares were:

shares, please contact:

www.capitadeal.com – online dealing

0870 458 4577 – telephone dealing

Price at 30 September 2005

Lowest price during the year

Highest price during the year

456.0p

318.4p

457.0p

Daily information on the company’s share price can be

obtained on our website or by telephoning:

The Financial Times Cityline Service on 09068 432 750.

Capital gains tax

The market value of the company’s shares for capital

gains tax purposes at 31 March 1982 was 6.08p.

Website

Please note that the directors of the company are not

seeking to encourage shareholders to either buy or sell

their shares. Shareholders in any doubt as to what action

to take are recommended to seek financial advice from

an independent financial adviser authorised by the

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

Secretary and registered office

Marie Glanville

Citygate

St James’ Boulevard

Newcastle upon Tyne

Website address www.graingertrust.co.uk

NE1 4JE

Shareholders’ enquiries

Company registration number 125575

All administrative enquiries relating to shareholdings 

(for example, notification of change of address, loss 

of share certificates, dividend payments) should be

addressed to the company’s registrar at:

Capita IRG plc, 

The Registry, 

34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, Kent

97

Auditors

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 

89 Sandyford Road, Newcastle upon Tyne

Stockbrokers

Cazenove & Company Ltd, 
20 Moorgate, London

Brewin Dolphin Securities, 

Commercial Union House, 39 Pilgrim Street, 

Newcastle upon Tyne

Registrars and transfer office

Capita IRG plc, 

The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road, 

Beckenham, Kent

Advisers

Solicitors

Dickinson Dees, 

St Ann’s Wharf,112 Quayside, 

Newcastle upon Tyne

Freshfields, Bruckhaus Deringer, 

65 Fleet Street, London

Hammonds, 

2 Park Lane, Leeds

Financial public relations

Baron Philips Associates, 

131 Finsbury Pavement, London

NP Public Relations and Marketing, 

8 Mosley Street, Newcastle upon Tyne

Bankers

Clearing Bank and Facility Agent

Barclays Bank PLC

Other Bankers

Lloyds TSB Bank plc

The Royal Bank of Scotland plc 

Allied Irish Banks plc

Bradford & Bingley plc

The Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland

National Australia Bank Limited

Nationwide Building Society

98

Glossary of terms

Property 

Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Assured periodic tenancy (‘APT’)

Market-rented tenancy arising from succession from regulated. 

Tenant has security of tenure. 

Assured shorthold tenancy (‘AST’)

Market-rented tenancy where landlord may obtain possession 

Assured tenancy (‘AT’)

Investment value (‘IV’)

Home reversion

if appropriate notice served.

Market-rented tenancy where tenant has right to renew.

Open market value of a property subject to relevant tenancies in place.

Rent free tenancy where tenant has right of occupation until possession 

is forfeited (usually on death). If tenant retains an equity interest in the 

property this is a partial home reversion. 

Regulated tenancy

Tenancy regulated under 1977 Rent Act, rent (usually sub market) set 

by rent officer and tenant has security of tenure.

Tenanted Residential (‘TR’)

Activity covering the acquisition, renting out and subsequent sale 

(usually on vacancy) of residential units subject to a tenancy agreement.

Vacant possession value (‘VP’)

Open market value of a property free from any tenancies.

Corporate 

Grainger NAV

IFRS

NNNAV adjusted for the after tax value of the reversionary surplus in 

our regulated and equity release portfolios discounted back to present

value using our risk adjusted weighted average cost of capital over the

expected average period of realisation.

International Financial Reporting Standards. These are mandatory for UK

listed companies for accounting periods ending on or after 31 December

2005. They will impact on Grainger’s financial statements in the year

ending 30 September 2006.

99

Financial

Cap

Financial instrument which, in return for a fee, guarantees an upper 

limit for the interest rate on a loan.

Contingent tax

The amount of tax that would be payable should assets be sold at the 

market value shown in the accounts.

Dividend cover 

Earnings per share divided by dividends per share.

Earnings per share (‘EPS’)

Profit attributable to shareholders divided by the weighted average 

FRS13

FRS19

Gearing

Hedging

number of shares in issue in the year.

Accounting standard requiring the disclosure of the market value 

of long-term debt and financial instruments.

Accounting standard prohibiting the provision of deferred tax on 

stock revaluation surpluses when companies are acquired. 

The ratio of borrowings net of cash to net asset value.

The use of financial instruments to protect against interest 

rate movements.

Interest cover

Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax divided by net 

Loan to value (‘LTV’)

Negative goodwill

interest payable. 

Ratio of net debt to the market value of properties.

On acquisition of a company, the surplus of the value of the statutory 

net assets acquired over the purchase price paid.

Net asset value (‘NAV’)

Shareholders’ funds adjusted for the market value of property assets 

held as stock.

Net net asset value (triple net or ‘NNNAV’)

NAV adjusted for contingent tax liabilities which would accrue if 

assets sold at market value and for the market value of long-term 

debt and derivatives. 

Swap

Financial instrument to protect against interest rate movements.

Total Shareholder Return (‘TSR’)

Return attributable to shareholders on basis of share price growth 

with dividends reinvested.

Weighted average cost of capital (‘WACC’)

The weighted average cost of funding the group’s activities through 

a combination of shareholders’ funds and debt.

100 Grainger Trust plc Annual report and accounts 2005

Corporate addresses

Newcastle

Citygate

St James’ Boulevard

Newcastle upon Tyne

NE1 4JE

Tel: 0191 261 1819

London

161 Brompton Road

London

SW3 1QP

Tel: 020 7795 4700

Birmingham

The Circle

Harborne

Birmingham

B17 9DY

www.graingertrust.co.uk

Ipswich

42a Barrach Square

Martlesham Heath

Ipswich 

Suffolk

IP5 3RF

Putney

1st Floor

SW15H Building

73-75 Upper Richmond Road

London

SW15 2SR

Manchester

St John’s House

Barrington Road

Altrincham 

Cheshire

WA14 1TJ

This report has been produced on paper from a sustainable source by

an environmentally accredited printing company. This report has been

printed by Empress Litho Ltd who are accredited with the ISO 14001

environmental management system. Produced entirely using vegetable

based inks which contain environmentally friendly, replenishable

vegetable oils. On average 87% of all waste associated with the

production of this report is recycled. The paper is made from at 

least 40% recovered fibre and 60% virgin fibre from plantation 

and sustainable forests. This report is recyclable and bio-degradable.

Designed and produced by corporateedge.com