More annual reports from GSI:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of GSI:
PV Crystalox Solar plcFiscal 2023 Annual Report and Proxy Statement l S t o c k h o d e r s L e t t e r July 17, 2023 To Our Stockholders: I hope this letter finds you well. I am pleased to provide you with an update on the progress and achievements of GSI Technology during the 2023 fiscal year. While the year presented us with positive developments and challenges, we have made significant strides in advancing our goals and positioning ourselves for future success. This year saw explosive growth and advancements in generative AI, with notable examples such as Chat GPT, Bard, and BingAI. The emergence of these powerful language models has sparked great excitement and anticipation for their potential applications. However, it is essential to recognize that the traditional CPU and GPU architectures, built on the von Neumann compute model, face inherent limitations when it comes to unleashing the full economic potential of generative AI. This is where GSI Technology’s APU, with its unique in-memory compute capabilities, comes into play. By harnessing the power of in-memory computing, our APU unlocks new possibilities for generative AI, enabling faster and more efficient processing of large language models. Our technology addresses the shortcomings of traditional architectures and positions GSI Technology at the forefront of the evolving generative AI landscape. We are excited about the opportunities that our technology presents and remain dedicated to driving innovation that transforms industries and maximizes the economic potential of generative AI. Our roadmap for Gemini-II and Gemini-III continues to build on the unique benefits that Gemini-I displays. So far, we have seen that our APU architecture can address significant problems that the industry faces. The APU scales to meet increased demand without the limitations of CPUs and GPUs. Zero-shot learning capability in the APU’s architecture allows the addition of new data without retraining. Our lower power consumption means a smaller carbon footprint and lower operating expenses for generative AI vendors. In conclusion, the 2023 fiscal year has been a year of industry growth, technological development, and progress in establishing partnerships for GSI Technology. We have navigated challenges, learned valuable lessons, and made strides in advancing our goals. We remain focused on prioritizing near-term opportunities for Gemini-I, particularly in the SAR and satellite sectors, where we believe we offer a superior solution. Additionally, our APU plug-in’s enhanced performance in vector search engines presents promising growth opportunities. As we move forward, we are determined to continue delivering innovative solutions, leveraging our technological expertise, and fostering strategic partnerships that drive long-term value for our shareholders. On behalf of the entire GSI Technology team, I want to express our sincere gratitude for your continued support and confidence in our vision. We remain committed to transparency, innovation, and delivering shareholder value. Together, we will navigate the opportunities and challenges to come, and I am confident in our ability to achieve success. Thank you for your trust and investment in GSI Technology. Sincerely, Lee-Lean Shu Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer (This page has been left blank intentionally.) July 17, 2023 Dear Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GSI Technology, Inc. to be held at 2:00 p.m. PDT, on Thursday, August 24, 2023. This year, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually via audio webcast. You will be able to attend and participate in the meeting by visiting https://meetnow.global/MQV6UG2, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions, and vote. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and a Proxy Statement, which describe the formal business to be conducted at the meeting, follow this letter. A copy of GSI Technology’s Annual Report to Stockholders is also enclosed for your information. After reading the Proxy Statement, please promptly mark, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying prepaid envelope. Alternatively, you may vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone. Instructions regarding these methods of voting are provided on the proxy card. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we urge you to sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or vote via the Internet or by telephone at your earliest convenience. We look forward to your online attendance at the annual meeting. Sincerely yours, Lee-Lean Shu President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman P r o x y S t a t e m e n t (This page has been left blank intentionally.) 1213 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held August 24, 2023 TO THE STOCKHOLDERS: Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of the stockholders of GSI Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held on Thursday, August 24, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. PDT, via audio webcast at https://meetnow.global/MQV6UG2, for the following purposes: 1. To elect seven persons to serve on our Board of Directors until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified; 2. To ratify the appointment of BDO USA, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024; 3. To vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the fiscal 2023 compensation of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for the annual meeting; 4. To vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and 5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. These business items are described more fully in the proxy statement accompanying this Notice. Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR all of the nominees proposed by our Board of Directors, and FOR Proposals No. 2 and 3 and a vote of EVERY YEAR for Proposal No. 4. Stockholders of record at the close of business on July 5, 2023 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. For ten days prior to the meeting, a complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder, for any purpose relating to the meeting, during ordinary business hours at our principal offices located at 1213 Elko Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94089. In addition, this list will be available online during the meeting. This year, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually via audio webcast. You will be able to attend and participate in the meeting by visiting https://meetnow.global/MQV6UG2, where you will be able to listen to the meeting live, submit questions, and vote. To access the audio webcast of the meeting, you must have the information that is printed on the shaded bar area located on the reverse side of the Notice. You must enter a valid control number to enter the virtual meeting. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Sunnyvale, California July 17, 2023 Robert Yau Secretary IMPORTANT: Please vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone, in accordance with the instructions contained in the accompanying materials, or by dating and signing the proxy card and returning it in the accompanying postage-paid envelope to ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. If you attend the audio webcast of the meeting, you may choose to vote your shares even if you have previously sent in your proxy card or submitted your proxy via the Internet. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24, 2023: Our proxy statement is enclosed. Financial and other information concerning GSI Technology, Inc. is contained in our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. A complete set of proxy materials relating to our annual meeting is available on the Internet. These materials, consisting of the notice of annual meeting, proxy statement, proxy card and annual report to stockholders, may be viewed and downloaded at: http://ir.gsitechnology.com/proxy-materials. TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board of Directors Leadership Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Committees and Meeting Attendance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Nominations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Qualifications Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Communications with Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Evaluation of the Board of Directors and Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Attendance at Annual Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Corporate Governance Guidelines; Director Stock Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Transactions with Related Persons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1 6 9 9 9 9 10 10 11 13 13 14 14 14 14 15 15 16 17 PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 PROPOSAL NO. 4 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Compensation Committee Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary Compensation Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grants of Plan-Based Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Last Fiscal Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Potential Payments Upon Change of Control Compensation of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equity Compensation Plan Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT NEXT ANNUAL MEETING . . . . . . TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 20 20 25 26 26 27 28 28 30 31 32 36 37 39 39 39 i P r o x y S t a t e m e n t (This page has been left blank intentionally.) GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1213 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS To Be Held August 24, 2023 The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of GSI Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for use at its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, August 24, 2023, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This proxy statement and the enclosed proxy are being mailed to stockholders on or about July 17, 2023. References in this proxy statement to the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” and “GSI Technology” are to GSI Technology, Inc., and references to the “annual meeting” are to the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. When we refer to the Company’s fiscal year, we mean the annual period ending on March 31. This proxy statement covers our fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 (“fiscal 2023”). INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING Why am I receiving these proxy materials? We sent you this proxy statement and proxy card because your Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the annual meeting. This proxy statement contains important information that is intended to assist you in making informed decisions regarding your vote. How can I attend the Annual Meeting? The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders, which will be conducted exclusively by audio webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting only if you were a stockholder of the Company as of the close of business on the Record Date, or if you hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting. No physical meeting will be held. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting https://meetnow.global/MQV6UG2. You also will be able to vote your shares by attending the Annual Meeting by audio webcast. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need to review the information included on your Notice, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You must enter a valid control number to enter the virtual meeting. If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance using the instructions below. The online meeting will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m. PDT. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time in order to allow ample time to complete the check in process. Please follow the registration instructions as outlined in this proxy statement. How do I register to attend the Annual Meeting? If you are a registered shareholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the Annual Meeting. Please follow the instructions on the notice or proxy card that you received. If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance to attend the Annual Meeting. To register to attend the Annual Meeting, you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your GSI Technology, Inc. holdings along with your name and email address to Computershare 1 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t via email or U.S. mail. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m. EDT, on August 21, 2023. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after we receive your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare using the following contact information: By email: Forward the email from your broker, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com By mail: Computershare GSI Technology, Inc. Legal Proxy P.O. Box 43001 Providence, RI 02940-3001 What items of business will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? Stockholders will vote on four proposals at the annual meeting: • to elect seven persons to serve on our Board of Directors until the 2024 annual meeting (Proposal No. 1); • to ratify the appointment of BDO USA, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024 (Proposal No. 2); • to vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the fiscal 2023 compensation of our named executive officers (as defined in this proxy statement) (Proposal No. 3); and • to vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4). We will also consider any other business that properly comes before the annual meeting. What is a proxy? A proxy is your designation of another person or persons to vote your shares on your behalf. By properly signing and returning the enclosed proxy card, or by voting via the Internet or by telephone, you give the persons designated as proxies by our Board of Directors the authority to vote your shares in the manner that you specify. How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares? Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares: • FOR all of the Board’s nominees for director, as listed and described under Proposal No. 1; • FOR ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024; • FOR approval of the advisory (non-binding) resolution approving the fiscal 2023 compensation of our named Executive Officers; and • FOR an advisory vote on executive compensation every year. Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting? Only stockholders of record at the close of business on July 5, 2023 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the annual meeting. As of the Record Date, 25,083,143 shares of our common stock were outstanding. 2 How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting? The presence of the holders of a majority of all shares outstanding and entitled to vote, whether attending the audio webcast or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. If a quorum is not present, the annual meeting will be adjourned until a quorum is obtained. How many votes do I have? Each stockholder is entitled to cast one vote for each share of our common stock held on the Record Date. If I am a stockholder of record, how do I vote? If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials have been sent directly to you. If you are a stockholder of record, there are four ways to vote your shares: • by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and returning it in the envelope provided; • via the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card you received; • by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card; or • by attending the audio webcast of the annual meeting and voting at the directed time. If I am a beneficial owner of shares, how do I vote? If your shares are held for you in an account with a broker, bank or similar organization, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those shares, which are generally referred to as being held in “street name,” and you should have received these proxy materials from that organization. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, there are several ways to vote your shares: • by completing, signing and dating the voting instruction form provided by the organization that holds your shares and returning the form to that organization, which will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions; • if your broker, bank or other nominee permits you to provide voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone, you may vote that way as well; or • by attending the audio webcast of the annual meeting and voting at the directed time. However, in order to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the organization that holds your shares. Follow the instructions from the broker, bank or other organization holding your shares to obtain such a proxy. In order that your shares are properly voted, we encourage you to provide specific voting instructions with respect to each proposal to any organization that holds your shares in street name by carefully following the organization’s voting instructions. What happens if I do not provide specific voting instructions? If you are a stockholder of record and you return a signed and dated proxy card without providing specific voting instructions, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board of Directors on all of the proposals described in this proxy statement. If any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares as they may determine in their discretion. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide specific voting instructions to the organization that holds your shares, the organization may generally vote your shares at their discretion on “routine matters” but cannot vote on “non-routine” matters. “Non-routine” matters would include the election of directors (Proposal No. 1), the advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation (Proposal No. 3) and the advisory (non-binding) vote regarding the frequency of future advisory votes on 3 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t executive compensation (Proposal No. 4), while “routine” matters would include the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 2). How many votes are needed to elect directors? Members of the GSI Technology Board of Directors are elected by plurality vote. Accordingly, the seven persons duly nominated at the annual meeting who receive the highest number of FOR votes will be elected as directors. How many votes are needed to approve proposals Nos. 2, 3 and 4? The appointment of BDO USA, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal No. 2) and approval of the advisory (non-binding) vote regarding fiscal 2023 executive officer compensation (Proposal No. 3) each require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented and voting at the annual meeting. The option of one year, two years or three years (Proposal No. 4) that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that we will consider to have been recommended by our stockholders. How are broker non-votes and abstentions treated? A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holds shares in street name for the beneficial owner but, with respect to a particular proposal, does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares (i.e., it is a “non-routine” matter) and has not received timely voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes and abstentions are counted as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the meeting. Votes withheld and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal No. 1). Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the preferred frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4). Proposals Nos. 2 and 3 each requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares represented and voting at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will reduce the number of shares voting as well as the number of shares in favor of the proposal and, therefore, will have no impact on the results of voting. Can I revoke my proxy or change my vote? Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the annual meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote in any of the following ways: • by signing and returning a proxy card with a later date that is received before the polls close at the annual meeting; • by voting again via the Internet or by telephone before the polls close at the annual meeting; • by voting during the audio webcast of the annual meeting; or • by giving written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Please note that attendance at the audio webcast of the annual meeting, in and of itself, will not revoke your proxy. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote in any of the following ways: • by signing and returning an instruction form with a later date; • by voting again via the Internet or by telephone (if such voting is allowed by your broker, bank or other nominee) before the polls close at the annual meeting; or 4 • by voting during the audio webcast of the annual meeting (although, as noted above, in order to vote at the annual meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares). How will the votes be counted? Votes taken at the annual meeting will be counted by an independent inspector of election appointed by the Company. How can I find out the results of the voting? Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. Final voting results will be tabulated by the inspector of election. We will publish voting results known to us in a Form 8-K report to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within four business days after the annual meeting. If final results are not available to use at the time of such filing, we will file an amendment to the Form 8-K report to publish the final results within four business days after they are known to us. Who will solicit proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors? Proxies may be solicited by directors and officers of the Company, without additional compensation. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, facsimile, e-mail or personal solicitation. None of the participants will receive additional compensation for assisting with the solicitation. You may also be solicited by press releases issued by us and postings on our corporate website. Unless expressly indicated otherwise, information contained on our corporate website is not part of this proxy statement. Who will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies? We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies on behalf of GSI Technology. We will also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents, upon their request, for the costs of forwarding our proxy materials to beneficial owners of stock held in their name. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t 5 PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS We have a Board of Directors consisting of seven directors who will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. The Board of Directors’ nominees for election at the annual meeting are Jack A. Bradley, Elizabeth Cholawsky, Haydn Hsieh, Ruey L. Lu, Barbara Nelson, Lee-Lean Shu and Robert Yau. All nominees currently serve on the Board of Directors. If elected, the seven nominees will serve as directors until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2024 and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. If any of the nominees declines to serve or becomes unavailable for any reason, or if a vacancy occurs before the election (although we know of no reason to anticipate that this will occur), the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominees as we may designate. These seven nominees represent a balance of directors with a history of service on the Board and newer directors with a strong mix of relevant experience. Our Nominating and Governance Committee and Board of Directors have evaluated each of our nominees against the factors and principles we use to select nominees for director, which are described elsewhere in this proxy statement. Based on this evaluation, our Nominating and Governance Committee and Board of Directors concluded that it is in the best interests of GSI Technology and its stockholders for each of the seven nominees named above to serve as a member of the Board of Directors. If a quorum is present and voting, the seven nominees for director receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. A WITHHOLD vote will have no effect on the vote. Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee named herein will be unable or unwilling to serve. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the nominees named above. The following table sets forth information regarding our current directors, each of whom is a nominee for election at the annual meeting, as of June 30, 2023: Nominee’s Name Principal Occupation Jack A. Bradley Partner, David Powell Financial Services Elizabeth Cholawsky Chief Executive Officer of HG Insights Inc. Haydn Hsieh Ruey L. Lu Barbara Nelson Lee-Lean Shu Robert Yau Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer of Wistron NeWeb Corp. President of eMPIA Technology Former Vice President, Western Digital Corporation; Board member, Audit Committee member and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Backblaze, Inc. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of GSI Technology Vice President, Engineering and Secretary of GSI Technology Director Since Age 74 67 68 67 68 68 70 2015 2019 2008 2000 2021 1995 1995 Business Experience of Director Nominees Set forth below is a description of the business experience of each director nominee, including a discussion of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Nominating and Governance Committee and our Board of Directors to conclude that those individuals should serve as directors. Jack A. Bradley has served as a member of our Board of Directors since March 2015. Mr. Bradley has been a partner in David Powell Financial Services, an advisor to early-stage companies, since September 2014. From February 2006 through March 2013, Mr. Bradley served as Chief Executive Officer of Packet Design, Inc. (“PDI”), a venture capital-funded company that developed and marketed analytic management systems for data communications. From March 2001 to February 2006, Mr. Bradley served as Chief Financial Officer of Packet Design, LLC, a developer of networking infrastructure software that spun off 6 several networking companies, including PDI. Prior to joining Packet Design, LLC, Mr. Bradley held senior operational and financial management positions with several networking and communications companies, including Cisco Systems, Inc. (General Manager of Video Internet Services Business Unit), Network Computing Devices, Inc. (Chief Financial Officer and Interim Chief Executive Officer), 3Com Corporation (Vice President and General Manager, International Division), and Bridge Communications, Inc. (Chief Financial Officer). Mr. Bradley holds a B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of San Francisco. Mr. Bradley brings over 30 years’ experience in executive management positions with public and private companies engaged in the software, systems and semiconductor industries. In particular, his extensive experience in the networking and communications industries, including his operational experience with providing integrated hardware and software solutions to customers, enables him to provide advice and guidance as we develop our new in-place associative computing products. Elizabeth Cholawsky has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2019. Since April 2018, Dr. Cholawsky has served as the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of HG Insights Inc., a technology intelligence big data company that provides sales and marketing insights for B2B companies in the Fortune 500. Since August 2019, Dr. Cholawsky has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of American Riviera Bancorp (OTCQX: ARBV), a full-service community bank in Santa Barbara, California. From November 2016 to March 2018, Dr. Cholawsky was a partner at Cholawsky Gruenfeld Advisory, providing SaaS strategy consulting services to high growth companies. Dr. Cholawsky served as President, CEO and Board member of Support.com, Inc. (Nasdaq: SPRT) from May 2014 to October 2016, where she formulated and led a transformation strategy, developing and bringing to market a new category of products. Dr. Cholawsky has a Ph.D. in Political Science with a concentration in Econometrics from the University of Minnesota and a B.A. (cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa) from Franklin & Marshall College. Dr. Cholawsky’s extensive experience in product innovation, marketing strategies and customer development, along with her expertise in data software solutions, enables her to provide advice and guidance with the marketing and sale of our new in-place associative computing products. Haydn Hsieh has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2008. Mr. Hsieh has served as the Chief Strategy Officer of Wistron NeWeb Corp., a manufacturer of wireless communications products, since December 2017, its Chief Executive Officer from June 2000 through December 2017, its Vice Chairman from June 2000 through June 2014, and its Chairman since June 2014. From February 1981 through June 2000, Mr. Hsieh served in various management capacities at several divisions of Acer Group, a manufacturer of personal computers and related products, including President of the Mobile Computing Business Unit and Senior Vice President of Acer Inc. Mr. Hsieh holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Tatung Institute of Technology and participated in the Executive Program at the Graduate School of Business Administration of National Chengchi University in Taiwan. Mr. Hsieh’s broad management background provides relevant experience in a number of strategic and operational areas, including his management experience with the application and manufacturing of systems and modules, enables him to provide advice and guidance as we develop our new in-place associative computing products. Moreover, his management experience with, and service as an outside board member to, companies headquartered in Taiwan provides him with relevant insight into that country, where GSI Technology has significant operations, as well as a valuable perspective on global business operations. Ruey L. Lu has served as a member of our Board of Directors since October 2000. Mr. Lu is the President of eMPIA Technology Corp., a semiconductor solutions company, which he founded in January 2002. From March 1993 to December 2000, Mr. Lu served as President of ARK Logic, a storage device and software applications company, which he founded. From October 1989 to February 1993, Mr. Lu served as Director of Engineering in the Imaging Product Division of Western Digital Corporation, an information storage company. Mr. Lu holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Taipei Institute of Technology and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Missouri. Mr. Lu’s experience as President of eMPIA Technology and in executive roles at ARK Logic and Western Digital has provided him with broad industry and executive experience, including the co-design of hardware and software platforms like our new in-place associative computing products. Moreover, his management experience with a company headquartered in Taiwan provides him with relevant insight into that country, where GSI Technology has significant operations, as well as a valuable perspective on global business operations. Barbara Nelson has served as a member of our Board of Directors since August 2021. Ms. Nelson has been serving since October 2020 as a member of the Board of Directors, member of the Audit Committee 7 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Backblaze, Inc. (Nasdaq: BLZE), a cloud data management, storage and backup SaaS company. Ms. Nelson joined the board of Omniscient Neurotechnology (o8t) in October of 2022. O8t is a private company that provides an AI platform for brain connectivity offered in software tools used today in neurosurgery and applicable to address a variety of mental illnesses such as depression in the future. From May 2017 to April 2020, she served as Vice President, and from November 2016 to May 2017 she served as senior consultant to the President and Chief Operating Officer, at Western Digital Corporation (Nasdaq: WDC), a data technology products, systems and cloud storage services company. From May 2013 to March 2016, she served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of the IronKey, the mobile security and SaaS division of Imation Corp (NYSE: IMN) a data storage and information security products and solutions company. From July 2008 to March 2010, Ms. Nelson served as Chief Executive Officer of Element Labs Inc., a video and LED- lighting company and from October 2003 to December 2007, Ms. Nelson served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of NeoScale Systems Inc., an enterprise storage security and key management company. Ms. Nelson holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. Ms. Nelson’s extensive experience in the semiconductor and storage industries, with over fifteen years of P&L leadership, in matters of go-to-market, product development and finance, and her expertise in cloud services and SaaS businesses enables her to provide valuable input and guidance to our Board and management team. Lee-Lean Shu co-founded our company in March 1995 and has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since our inception. In October 2000, Mr. Shu became Chairman of our Board. From January 1995 to March 1995, Mr. Shu was Director, SRAM Design at Sony Microelectronics Corporation, a semiconductor company and a subsidiary of Sony Corporation, and from July 1990 to January 1995, he was a design manager at Sony Microelectronics Corporation. Mr. Shu holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Tatung Institute of Technology and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles. It is our policy that our Chief Executive Officer should serve on our Board. In addition, Mr. Shu’s role as a co-founder of our company and his day-to-day involvement in the management of our business has provided him with extensive knowledge and understanding of GSI Technology and its industry. As Chief Executive Officer, he is in a unique position to provide our Board with insight and information related to our business and operations and to participate in the ongoing review of strategic issues. Robert Yau co-founded our company in March 1995 and has served as our Vice President, Engineering and as a member of our Board of Directors since our inception. From December 1993 to February 1995, Mr. Yau was design manager for specialty memory devices at Sony Microelectronics Corporation. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Yau was design manager at MOSEL/VITELIC, a semiconductor company. Mr. Yau holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at Arlington and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley. As a co-founder, our Vice President, Engineering, and an expert in SRAM technology, Mr. Yau is able to provide the Board with an understanding of our technology and our product development strategy as well as expert perspective on industry trends and opportunities. 8 Director Independence CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The Board of Directors has determined that, other than Lee-Lean Shu and Robert Yau, each of the members of the Board is an “independent director” for purposes of the Nasdaq Listing Rules and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as the term relates to membership on the Board and the various Board committees. There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers. Board of Directors Leadership Structure Lee-Lean Shu serves as both our Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of our Board of Directors. The Board believes that combining the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is appropriate in the case of Mr. Shu, given his role in founding GSI Technology and his significant ownership stake and also because Mr. Shu is the Board member who is most familiar with our business strategy and most knowledgeable regarding our industry. The Board also believes that the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer facilitates the flow of information between the Board and management, improves the Board’s ability to focus on key policy and operational issues and helps the Board operate in the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Board has determined that, at any time the office of Chairman is filled by our Chief Executive Officer or another employee of GSI Technology, a non-employee director, recommended by the Nominating and Governance Committee, shall be designated to serve as lead director. Jack A. Bradley currently serves in that position and provided that he is re-elected at the annual meeting, will continue to serve as lead director through our annual meeting of stockholders in 2024. The lead director serves as the principal liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman. In that capacity, the lead director presides over executive sessions of the independent directors, chairs Board meetings in the Chairman’s absence, and collaborates with the Chairman on agendas, schedules and materials for Board meetings. The Board believes that this leadership structure provides the appropriate balance of management and non-management oversight. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically evaluates our leadership structure to ensure that we maintain a structure that is beneficial to us and our stockholders, and will recommend any appropriate changes to the Board. The Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including general economic risks, operational risks, financial risks, legal risks, strategic and competitive risks and reputational risks. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks that we face, while the Board of Directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. Our independent committee chairs and members are experienced professionals or executives who can and do raise risk related issues for Board consideration and review and who are willing to challenge management when necessary. As part of its risk oversight role, the Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. In addition, the Board is responsible for matters relating to management and Board succession planning. While the full Board of Directors is charged with ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, committees of the Board also have responsibilities with respect to various aspects of risk management oversight. During the course of the year, each committee of the Board spends a portion of their time reviewing and discussing specific risk topics. The full Board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and related activities. Strategic, operational and competitive risks also are presented and discussed at the Board’s quarterly meetings, and more often as necessary. On at least an annual basis, the Board reviews our long-term strategic plans. The Audit Committee plays a significant role in monitoring and assessing our financial risk exposures, financial reporting, internal controls, liquidity risk, compliance risk and operational risks, including cyber security. The Audit Committee is also responsible for establishing and administering our code of conduct and 9 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t reviewing transactions between the Company and any related parties. The Audit Committee meets periodically in separate executive session with the Chief Financial Officer and our independent auditor, as well as with committee members only, to facilitate a full and candid discussion of risk and other issues. The Compensation Committee oversees human capital risks, monitors and assesses risks associated with our compensation policies and consults with management and the Board concerning the development of incentives that encourage a level of risk-taking consistent with our overall strategy, as further discussed under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The Compensation Committee also is charged with monitoring our incentive and equity-based compensation plans, including employee retirement and benefit plans. The Nominating and Governance Committee has oversight responsibility for corporate governance risks, including risks associated with Board and committee composition, Board size and structure, director independence and Board and committee effectiveness. In addition to the responsibilities undertaken by the committees discussed above, the Board committees may have oversight of specific risk areas consistent with the committees’ charters and responsibilities. Our executive management meets regularly to discuss our strategy and the risks that we face. Senior officers regularly attend Board meetings where they are available to address questions or concerns raised by the Board regarding risk management related matters. Executive Sessions Non-management directors generally meet in executive session without the presence of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Vice President, Engineering, at each regularly scheduled meeting of the Board. The non-management director serving as lead director, acts as the presiding director for these executive sessions. Committees and Meeting Attendance The Board of Directors has three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board of Directors held fourteen meetings during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. During fiscal 2023, no director attended fewer than 86% of the total number of meetings of the Board and all of the committees of the Board on which such director served that were held during that period. Our Nominating and Governance Committee, as part of its governance review, evaluates the composition of each of our Board committees to ensure that we maintain a structure that is beneficial to us and our stockholders, and recommends any appropriate changes to our Board of Directors. The following table sets forth the current members of each of our Board’s standing committees as of the date of this proxy statement: Committee Member Audit Compensation Nominating and Governance Jack A. Bradley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chair Elizabeth Cholawsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Haydn Hsieh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ruey L. Lu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Barbara Nelson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X X X Chair X X X X X Chair Audit Committee The members of the Audit Committee during fiscal 2023 were Mr. Bradley (Chair upon Ms. Le’s resignation from the board in December 2022), Mr. Hsieh, Ms. Nelson (beginning in September 2022), Dr. Cholawsky and Ms. Le (Chair, until her resignation from the board in December 2022). The Audit Committee held eleven meetings during fiscal 2023. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent for purposes of the Nasdaq Listing Rules as they apply to audit committee members. Mr. Bradley and Ms. Nelson have been designated as “audit committee financial experts,” as the term is defined in applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee operates under a charter that is available on our website at www.gsitechnology.com. The functions of the Audit Committee include oversight, review and evaluation of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting processes and public filings, 10 disclosure control and internal control functions, compliance with policies and procedures, cyber and data security and information technology risk exposures and the audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is responsible for the engagement, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. Additional information regarding the Audit Committee is set forth in the Report of the Audit Committee immediately following Proposal No. 2. Compensation Committee The members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal 2023 were Dr. Cholawsky (Chair) and Messrs. Bradley, Hsieh and Lu. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings during fiscal 2023. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent for purposes of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee operates under a charter that is available on our website at www.gsitechnology.com. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in carrying out its responsibilities with respect to: (i) overseeing our compensation policies and practices; and (ii) reviewing and approving compensation and compensation procedures for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include: periodically reviewing and advising the Board of Directors concerning overall compensation philosophy, policies and plans, including reviewing both regional and industry compensation practices and trends; identifying any peer group of companies to be used for comparison purposes; reviewing and approving all performance goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of all executive officers and assessing the achievement of such goals and objectives; determining and approving all compensation for our executive officers (including salary and incentive-based compensation and awards); making recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the establishment and terms of incentive compensation plans, and administering such plans; and approving grants of options and other equity awards to all executive officers and other eligible individuals under our equity compensation plans. Other responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include: reviewing and approving compensation related matters outside the ordinary course of business, including but not limited to employment contracts, change-in-control provisions, severance arrangements, and material amendments thereto; preparing an annual report on executive compensation, including a Compensation Discussion and Analysis, for inclusion in the proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders; monitoring and assessing risks associated with our compensation policies and consulting with management regarding such risks; and reporting to the Board of Directors on the Compensation Committee’s activities on a regular basis. Regarding most compensation matters, including executive compensation, our management provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee and its activities is set forth under the heading “Executive Compensation” in this proxy statement. Nominating and Governance Committee The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee during fiscal 2023 were Messrs. Bradley (Chair until December 2022), Lu, and Dr. Cholawsky and Ms. Nelson (Chair beginning in December 2022). The Nominating and Governance Committee held five meetings during fiscal 2023. Each of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent for purposes of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee operates under a charter that is available on our website at www.gsitechnology.com. The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies prospective Board candidates, recommends nominees for election to our Board of Directors, develops and recommends Board member selection criteria, considers committee member qualification, reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding Board and committee compensation based in part upon input from an independent national compensation consulting firm engaged for that purpose, recommends corporate governance principles to the Board of Directors, reviews and proposes responses to shareholder proposals, and provides oversight in the evaluation of the Board of Directors and each committee. Director Nominations The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, the selection and recommendation to the Board of Directors of nominees for election as directors. When considering the nomination of directors for election at an annual meeting, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews the needs of the Board of Directors for various skills, background and experience. When reviewing 11 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t potential nominees, including incumbents, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the current and future needs of GSI Technology to ensure that the Board of Directors has the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, judgment, perspectives and backgrounds. The Nominating and Governance Committee also seeks appropriate input from the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers in assessing the needs of the Board of Directors for relevant knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, judgment, perspective and background of its members. The Nominating and Governance Committee’s goal is to assemble a Board of Directors that brings to GSI Technology a diversity of experience at policy-making levels in business and technology, and in areas that are relevant to GSI Technology’s global activities. Directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. They must have an inquisitive and objective outlook and mature judgment. They must also have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility and be leaders in the companies or institutions with which they are, or have been, affiliated. Director candidates must have sufficient time available, in the judgment of the Nominating and Governance Committee, to perform all Board and committee responsibilities that will be expected of them. Members of the Board of Directors are expected to rigorously prepare for, attend and participate in all meetings of the Board of Directors and applicable committees. While we do not have a specific policy regarding diversity, when considering the nomination of directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee does consider the diversity of its directors and nominees in terms of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, judgment, perspective, background and other demographic factors. Other than the foregoing, there are no specific minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that it is preferable that a majority of the Board of Directors meet the definition of “independent director” set forth in Nasdaq and SEC rules. The Nominating and Governance Committee also believes it appropriate for one or more key members of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer, to serve on the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates for director proposed by directors or management, and will evaluate any such candidates against the criteria and pursuant to the policies and procedures set forth above. If the Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the Board of Directors requires additional candidates for nomination, the Nominating and Governance Committee may engage, as appropriate, a third party search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. The nominating process may also include interviews and additional background and reference checks for non- incumbent nominees, at the discretion of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider candidates for director recommended by a stockholder, provided that any such recommendation is sent in writing to the Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary at the address noted below, at least 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date definitive proxy materials were mailed to stockholders in connection with the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders and contains the following information: • the candidate’s name, age, contact information and present principal occupation or employment; and • a description of the candidate’s qualifications, skills, background and business experience during at least the last five years, including his or her principal occupation and employment and the name and principal business of any company or other organization where the candidate has been employed or has served as a director. The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate any candidates recommended by stockholders against the same criteria and pursuant to the same policies and procedures applicable to the evaluation of candidates proposed by directors or management. In addition, stockholders may make direct nominations of directors for election at an annual meeting, provided the advance notice requirements set forth in our bylaws have been met. Under our bylaws, written notice of such nomination, including certain information and representations specified in the bylaws, must be delivered to our principal executive offices, addressed to the Corporate Secretary, at least 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date definitive proxy materials were mailed to stockholders in connection with the prior year’s annual meeting of stockholders, except that if no annual meeting was held in the previous year or the date of the annual meeting has been advanced by more than 30 days from the date contemplated at the time of the previous year’s proxy statement, such notice must be received not later than the close of 12 business on the 10th day following the day on which the public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. To comply with the universal proxy rules, with respect to our 2024 annual meeting, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Board of Directors’ nominees must provide us with notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act and our bylaws no later than June 25, 2024. Director Qualifications Matrix The following matrix shows how the Nominating and Governance Committee has applied our director criteria to the director nominees and identifies areas of expertise and experience that may benefit the Board in the future and led to each nominee’s selection as a member of the Board, as well as gaps in those areas that may arise as directors retire. Qualification Audit and Financial Expertise Broad Business & Corporate Governance Experience Public Company Board Experience Understanding of a Board’s Legal Duties and Responsibilities Cybersecurity Expertise ESG Expertise Relevant Industry Experience (Semiconductor) Relevant Industry Experience (Software/SaaS) Strategic Planning Capabilities Capital Markets Expertise International Business Experience Sales Experience Risk Management Background Leadership Skills Diversity (Gender) Diversity (Ethnic/Racial) Board Diversity Jack A. Bradley ✓ Elizabeth Cholawsky ✓ Haydn Hsieh ✓ Ruey-Lin Lu ✓ Barbara Nelson ✓ Lee-Lean Shu ✓ Robert Yau ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Nasdaq Listing Rules require all Nasdaq listed companies to annually disclose voluntary self-identified diversity information regarding their board of directors. The following table sets forth the Board’s diversity statistics in the format prescribed by the Nasdaq rules. Our Board Diversity Matrix as of June 30, 2022 can be found in the proxy statement for our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2022. 13 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Total Number of Directors Part I: Gender Identity Board Diversity Matrix (as of June 30, 2023) 7 Female Male Non-Binary Did Not Disclose Gender Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Part II: Demographic Background African American or Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Alaskan Native or Native American . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Asian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Hispanic or Latinx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — White (not of Hispanic or Latinx origin) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Two or More Races or Ethnicities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 5 — — 4 — — 1 — — — — — — — — — LGBTQ+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Did Not Disclose Demographic Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — — — — — — — Communications with Directors Stockholders may send any communications to the Board of Directors or any individual director at the following address. All communications received are reported to the Board or the individual directors: Board of Directors (or name of individual director(s)) c/o Secretary GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1213 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, California, 94089 Our Secretary will forward all such communications to the Board of Directors, or the individual director or directors, except for spam, junk mail, mass mailings, product complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations, advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material. Our Secretary may forward certain correspondence, such as product-related inquiries, elsewhere within GSI Technology for review and possible response. Evaluation of the Board of Directors and Committees Approximately once a year, the members of the Board of Directors and each Board committee hold a special meeting to conduct a confidential oral assessment of their performance and effectiveness. This process is coordinated by the lead director and the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. As part of the evaluation process, the Board and each Committee reviews its overall composition, including director tenure, board leadership structure, diversity and individual skill sets, to ensure it serves the best interests of stockholders and positions the Company for future success. After the evaluations, the Board and management work to improve upon any issues or focus points disclosed during the evaluation process. Director Attendance at Annual Meetings We attempt to schedule our annual meeting of stockholders at a time and date to accommodate attendance by directors, taking into account the directors’ schedules. Directors are encouraged to attend our annual meeting of stockholders, but the Board has not adopted a formal policy with respect to such attendance. Five of the eight directors then serving on the Board attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; Corporate Governance Guidelines; Director Stock Ownership We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance 14 Committee, has also adopted a series of Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines include a director stock ownership requirement, which provides that directors must hold within the later of (a) five years following his or her first election or appointment to the Board, or (b) October 31, 2026, an amount of stock valued at the lesser of its purchase price or its fair market value (measured on October 31st of each year) equal to at least three times the total annual retainer cash compensation paid by the Company for Board service (excluding for this purpose compensation that is not paid to all independent directors, such as compensation for committee or chair service). The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.gsitechnology.com. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or grant any waiver from a provision of the Code to any executive officer or director, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website, as well as via any other means then required by Nasdaq Listing Rules or applicable law. Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation None of the members of the Compensation Committee are or have been an officer or employee of GSI Technology. During fiscal 2023, no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationship with GSI Technology requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. During fiscal 2023, none of GSI Technology’s executive officers served on the compensation committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity any of whose executive officers served on GSI Technology’s Compensation Committee or Board of Directors. Transactions with Related Persons GSI Technology incurred non-recurring engineering service expense and manufacturing services of approximately $240,000 and $397,000 during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2022, respectively, from Wistron NeWeb Corp (“WNC”) in connection with the design, development and manufacture of single-APU PCIe production boards, to be used in the Company’s in-place associative computing product. Mr. Hsieh, a member of the Board of Directors, is the Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer of WNC. For information regarding GSI Technology’s procedures for approval of transactions with related persons, please see “Related Person Transactions”. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t 15 PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of GSI Technology has selected BDO USA, P.A. (f/k/a BDO USA, LLP) as its independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of GSI Technology for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024. BDO USA, P.A. has acted in such capacity since its appointment in September 2017. A representative of BDO USA, P.A. is expected to be present at the 2023 Annual Meeting, with the opportunity to make a statement if the representative desires to do so, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions. At the 2023 Annual Meeting, the shareholders are being asked to ratify the selection of BDO USA, P.A. as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024. The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to GSI Technology for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2022 by BDO USA, P.A.: Audit fees(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax fees(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal 2023 Fiscal 2022 $926,200 30,778 $726,200 29,206 $956,978 $755,406 (1) Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of GSI Technology’s annual consolidated financial statements, the review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, review of registration statements and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. (2) Tax fees consist of fees for consultation on various tax matters and compliance with federal and state income tax filing requirements. The Audit Committee has determined that all services performed by BDO USA, P.A. are compatible with maintaining the independence of BDO USA, P.A. The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval. Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and voting on the matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will each be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024. 16 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE The Audit Committee oversees GSI Technology’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the design and maintenance of our internal control systems. Our independent registered public accounting firm, BDO USA, P.A., is responsible for expressing an opinion as to the conformity of our audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. BDO USA, P.A. has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since its appointment in September 2017. The Audit Committee currently consists of four directors, two of which have been designated as “audit committee financial experts.” Each member of the Committee, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, is an “independent director” as defined in the Nasdaq Listing Rules. The Audit Committee acts pursuant to a written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter provides, among other things, that the Audit Committee is to review the qualifications, independence and performance, and approve the terms of engagement, including the fees payable, for our independent auditor, oversee our system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, oversee our compliance with ethical standards and oversee the preparation of any reports required of the Audit Committee under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of this charter is available on our website at www.gsitechnology.com. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management GSI Technology’s audited financial statements and the results of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of GSI Technology’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2023. The Audit Committee has discussed and reviewed with our independent registered public accounting firm all of the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has met with BDO USA, P.A., with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope of BDO’s audit, the results of its examinations, and the overall quality of GSI Technology’s financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning their independence, and has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence, and satisfied itself as to our independent registered public accounting firm’s independence. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that GSI Technology’s audited financial statements be included in GSI Technology’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Jack A. Bradley (Chair) Elizabeth Cholawsky Haydn Hsieh Barbara Nelson The foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of GSI Technology under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that GSI Technology specifically incorporates such information by reference. 17 PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY-ON-PAY) Background In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related rules of the SEC, we provide our stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote. At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders voted in favor of holding future “Say-on-Pay” votes on an annual basis. The Board subsequently determined that such advisory votes shall be held annually at the annual meeting of stockholders. The vote is advisory, which means that it is not binding on the Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee or GSI Technology in any way. However, the Compensation Committee will review the outcome of the vote and take it into consideration when considering future executive compensation policies and decisions. At our 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 annual meetings, 99%, 99%, 99%, 98% and 75%, respectively, of the votes cast were voted in favor of the Company’s executive compensation program for the previous fiscal year. Partially as a result of this positive stockholder feedback, our Compensation Committee has adopted compensation packages having similar basic structures in subsequent years. As described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis included elsewhere in this proxy statement, we seek to closely align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders, and attract and retain superior executive talent. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our executive officers for the achievement of our short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total stockholder return, while avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Please read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section for a more detailed discussion of our compensation philosophy and our executive compensation program. The advisory vote on executive compensation solicited by this proposal is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our two other most highly-compensated executive officers, who are collectively referred to as our “named executive officers,” which is disclosed and discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement. Furthermore, because this non-binding, advisory resolution primarily relates to the compensation of our named executive officers that has already been paid or contractually committed, there is generally no opportunity for us to revisit these decisions. Stockholders will be asked at the annual meeting to approve the following resolution pursuant to this Proposal No. 3: “RESOLVED, that the stockholders of GSI Technology, Inc. approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 of the Company’s executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.” Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation Approval of this resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and voting on the matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will each be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum but will not have any effect on the outcome of the vote. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the foregoing resolution. 18 PROPOSAL NO. 4 ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION In connection with Proposal No. 3 above seeking advisory approval of our executive compensation program, Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the related rules of the SEC also require that we conduct a separate advisory (non-binding) stockholder vote every six years to advise on whether future Say-on-Pay votes should occur every one, two or three years. You have the option to vote for any one of the three options, or to abstain on the matter. At our 2017 annual meeting, our stockholders voted to hold an advisory vote on our executive compensation program on an annual basis. Our Board subsequently determined that such advisory votes shall be held annually at the annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, the Company has conducted a Say-on-Pay vote each year. Our Board and Compensation Committee believe that our stockholders continue to prefer to have an opportunity to express their views on the Company’s executive compensation program through an annual Say-on-Pay vote, and that the Company benefits from receiving feedback on stockholders’ views of the compensation of our named executive officers on an annual basis. In addition, the Compensation Committee and the Board believe annual advisory votes will continue to allow the Board to obtain information on stockholders’ views of the compensation of our named executive officers on a consistent basis, and will continue to provide our Compensation Committee and Board with frequent input from stockholders on our compensation program. By contrast, less frequent votes could allow an unpopular pay practice to continue too long without timely feedback. For the reasons stated above, the Compensation Committee and Board believe that holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year is a good corporate governance practice and the most appropriate policy for our stockholders and the Company at this time. You may cast your vote on your preferred frequency of future Say-on-Pay votes by choosing the option of one year, two years or three years, or abstain from voting when you vote in response to the resolution set forth below. RESOLVED, that the stockholders of GSI Technology, Inc. determine, on an advisory basis, that the frequency with which the stockholders of the Company shall have an advisory vote on executive compensation, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, shall be: P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Choice 1 — every year; Choice 2 — every two years; Choice 3 — every three years; or Choice 4 — abstain from voting. Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation The option of every year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers that we will consider to have been recommended by our stockholders. However, because this vote is advisory and is not binding on our Board of Directors, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option recommended by our stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and, accordingly, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on this Proposal No. 4. The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote for the option of every year as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on executive compensation, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K of the SEC rules. 19 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Compensation Discussion and Analysis Overview This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains our philosophy and objectives with respect to the compensation of our executive officers and our compensation-setting process and provides more detailed information regarding the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officer, determined as of March 31, 2023. We refer to these individuals as our “named executive officers.” This discussion focuses on the information contained in the tables and related footnotes and narrative included below, primarily for our 2023 fiscal year. Philosophy and Objectives Our fundamental compensation philosophy is to align the compensation of our senior management with our annual and long-term business objectives, performance against those objectives and creation of stockholder value, as well as to offer compensation that will enable us to attract, retain, and appropriately reward executive officers whose contributions are necessary for our long-term success. We seek to reward our executive officers’ contributions to achieving revenue growth, increasing operating profits and controlling costs. We operate in a very competitive environment for executive talent, and it is our belief that our compensation packages should be competitive when compared to our peers and should also be aligned with our stockholders’ interests. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors oversees the design and administration of our executive compensation program. The principal elements of the program are base salary, variable incentive cash compensation programs, long-term equity-based incentive compensation and broad-based benefits programs. The policy of the Compensation Committee is that the total compensation of the executive officers should generally be comparable to the median compensation paid by the Company’s peer companies to officers performing comparable functions. However, it has not been the Compensation Committee’s policy to adopt a rigid formula or benchmark system related to peer company compensation practices. Compensation-Setting Process Generally, the Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of our executive officers in the early part of each fiscal year and takes action at that time to set base salaries and variable compensation for the current year. In setting our executive officers’ total compensation, the Compensation Committee considers individual and company performance, as well as compensation surveys and other market information regarding compensation paid by comparable companies, including our industry peers. The Compensation Committee considers the grant of equity awards to all of our executive and non-executive officers at the same time, once a year, usually in July or August. In its annual review of compensation for GSI Technology’s executive officers, the Compensation Committee has considered compensation data and analyses assembled and prepared by the Committee and our Human Resources staff. The Chief Executive Officer provides the Compensation Committee with a review of each of the other executive officer’s individual performance and contributions over the past year and makes recommendations regarding their compensation, which the Compensation Committee considers. In making compensation decisions, our Chief Executive Officer and our Compensation Committee have considered the Company’s financial performance as well as the experience level and contributions of the individual executive officer, the role and responsibilities of the executive officer and market factors. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own consultants and advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. In February 2013, the Compensation Committee determined that it would periodically retain compensation consultants in connection with its annual review of executive officer compensation and, in accordance with such policy, engaged the services of Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”), an independent national compensation consulting firm, to assist it in connection with its annual review and determination of executive officer compensation for fiscal 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020 and 2022. Pursuant to the terms of its engagement, Compensia is directed to assist with the selection of the peer group and then, 20 using such peer group, provide a competitive assessment of executive officer compensation to the Compensation Committee and a similar assessment of director compensation programs to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Compensia pursuant to applicable SEC rules and concluded that no conflicts of interest existed that would affect Compensia’s independence in providing services and advice to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee did not retain the services of compensation consultants in connection with its annual review and determination of executive officer compensation for fiscal 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021 or 2023. At our annual meetings of stockholders, we provide our stockholders the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for the previous fiscal year, as disclosed in the proxy statement for the meeting (commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote). These stockholder advisory votes are held after the Compensation Committee has determined the compensation to be paid to our executive officers for the fiscal year in question. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee cannot take such results into account in determining executive compensation for that year. However, in its annual review of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee considers, among other things, the results of the stockholder Say-on-Pay vote for previous years. Components of Compensation In order to align executive compensation with our compensation philosophy, our executive compensation package contains three principal components: (i) base salary, (ii) variable cash compensation and (iii) long-term stock-based incentive awards. Each component of our executive compensation program is designed to reward a different aspect of performance. The base salaries of our executive officers are initially set based on negotiation with the individual officers at the time of their recruitment. Once set, these base salaries are subject to annual review. Our variable cash compensation plans are intended to motivate and reward performance over the current fiscal year. Our equity award program is designed to provide long-term retention incentives through the use of options subject to time-based vesting. We also provide our executive officers a variety of benefits that are available generally to all salaried employees. The basic elements of our executive compensation package are generally the same among our named executive officers. Fiscal 2023 Base Salary The base salaries of our executive officers are initially negotiated with the individual executive officer at the time of his or her recruitment or promotion and with reference to their experience, expected contribution, geographical location and market factors. Historically, the base salaries of our executive officers generally have been adjusted concurrently with our annual company-wide compensation review. During the first quarter of fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of executive compensation. In connection with its fiscal 2023 review, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of our Chief Financial Officer, compiled data on the same group of peer companies identified with the assistance of Compensia in connection with the fiscal 2022 review, with the exception of one company that was no longer a public reporting company (the “Fiscal 2023 Peer Companies”). The Fiscal 2023 Peer Companies include industry peers and similarly-sized companies in our broader industry group. The Fiscal 2023 Peer Companies were as follows: Aehr Test Systems Amtech Systems, Inc. AXT, Inc. CyberOptics eMagin Emcore Corporation Everspin Technologies Immersion Corporation inTEST Corporation Lantronix NVE Corporation Pixelworks, Inc QuickLogic Corporation Kopin Corporation Techpoint, Inc. In its annual review of executive compensation for fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee took into account its general compensation philosophy and objectives, as described above, and various other considerations, including: • available compensation data for the Fiscal 2023 Peer Companies; 21 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t • the Company’s financial performance during fiscal 2022, including the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on the Company’s revenues, lack of significant APU revenues and the Company’s continuing operating losses; • the outlook for the Company’s fiscal 2023 financial performance; and • management’s recommendation that no increase in officers’ base salaries over fiscal 2022 levels was deemed appropriate. The Committee also noted that, by positive votes at the last five annual meetings of stockholders, our stockholders had approved the compensation of our named executive officers. Partially in recognition of this positive stockholder feedback, the Committee adopted a compensation package for fiscal 2023 having the same basic structure as the compensation packages that had been adopted for previous years. On the basis of its review, in the first quarter of fiscal 2023 the Compensation Committee concluded that executive officer base salaries would not be increased. The fiscal 2023 base salaries of the named executive officers were as follows: Name Title Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . President and Chief Executive Officer Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President, Sales Fiscal 2023 Base Salary $431,912(1) $306,593(2) $322,712(3) Percentage Increase over Fiscal 2022 Base Salary — — — (1) (2) (3) In connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives announced in November 2022, Mr. Shu accepted a 30% reduction in his annual base salary. Effective December 1, 2022, Mr. Shu’s annual salary is $302,339. In connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives announced in November 2022, Mr. Schirle accepted a 10% reduction in his annual base salary. Effective December 1, 2022, Mr. Schirle’s annual salary is $275,934. In connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives announced in November 2022, Mr. Lasserre accepted a 10% reduction in his annual base salary. Effective December 1, 2022, Mr. Lasserre’s annual salary is $290,441. 2023 Variable Compensation Plan Under our compensation policy, a significant component of each executive officer’s potential annual compensation takes the form of a performance-based cash bonus. On May 31, 2022, the Compensation Committee adopted the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan, which was similar in structure to previous variable compensation plans for the Company’s executive officers. The 2023 Variable Compensation Plan was designed to encourage performance and retention of eligible employees by providing cash bonus awards based on the achievement of performance criteria based on net revenues, including a target for Associative Processing Unit (APU) net revenue and a target for a Rad tolerant/Rad Hard net revenue, all determined in accordance with US GAAP. Each of our executive officers was eligible to participate in the 2023 Plan. Certain non-executive officers were also eligible to participate. Under the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan, each participant had a designated target bonus, which was set at the same level as their target bonus under the 2022 Variable Compensation Plan. The target bonus for Lee-Lean Shu, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, was $250,000, and the target bonus for each of our other executive officers was $125,000. If the target financial goals were exceeded, actual bonus awards payable to participants in the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan could have been up to two times their target bonuses. There was no threshold or minimum amount payable under the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan. The Compensation Committee considered the critical role of Mr. Shu, our President and Chief Executive Officer, in our long-term success when determining his target bonus amount. The use of the same target bonus amount for each of our other named executive officers reflected the Compensation Committee’s desire to encourage a team approach by treating our executive officers equally with respect to bonus opportunities. The targets for net revenue, Associative Processing Unit (APU) net 22 revenue and Rad tolerant/Rad Hard net revenue were not met in fiscal 2023. There were no bonus awards earned under the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan in fiscal 2023. Original target bonus amounts for each of the named executive officers under the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan and the bonuses actually earned under the plan for their services during fiscal 2023 were as follows: Name Fiscal 2023 Target Bonus Fiscal 2023 Bonus Earned Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $250,000 Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $125,000 Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $125,000 — — — While no bonus awards were earned under the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan, the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan provided that any bonus awards paid would be subject to vesting based on the participant’s continued employment with the Company, with 60% becoming vested and payable on the last business day in April 2023 and 20% becoming vested and payable on the last business day in April of each of the succeeding two years. Total Fiscal 2023 Cash Compensation The total cash compensation of each of our named executive officers for fiscal 2023 was: Name Principal Position Fiscal 2023 Base Salary Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . President and Chief Executive Officer $431,912 Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President, Sales $306,593 $322,712 Fiscal 2023 Total Cash Compensation Earned $388,721(1) $296,373(2) $317,355(3) (1) (2) (3) In connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives announced in November 2022, Mr. Shu accepted a 30% reduction in his annual base salary. Effective December 1, 2022, Mr. Shu’s annual salary is $302,339. In connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives announced in November 2022, Mr. Schirle accepted a 10% reduction in his annual base salary. Effective December 1, 2022, Mr. Schirle’s annual salary is $275,934. In connection with the Company’s cost reduction initiatives announced in November 2022, Mr. Lasserre accepted a 10% reduction in his annual base salary. Effective December 1, 2022, Mr. Lasserre’s annual salary is $290,441. Fiscal 2023 cash compensation earned includes an annual car allowance of $5,400. Long-Term Incentive Compensation We utilize stock option awards as a primary component of compensation for our executive officers, with the objective of strengthening the mutuality of interests between the executive officers and our stockholders. These grants are designed to provide each executive with a significant incentive to manage from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in our company. All stock options granted to our employees, including named executive officers, and to our directors have exercise prices equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Our policies and procedures for the grant of stock- based awards provide that all options and other stock-based awards are generally to be granted by the Compensation Committee and, except in special circumstances, all grants are to be made at regular quarterly meetings of the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, option grants to new employees hired since the previous quarterly meeting and annual grants to continuing employees with anniversary dates subsequent to the previous meeting are made each quarter. The effective date of each quarterly grant is the later of the second trading day following the public announcement of our financial results for the preceding quarter or the date of the meeting at which the grant is approved. 23 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t The Compensation Committee considers the grant of equity awards to all of our executive and non-executive officers at the same time, once a year, usually in July or August. Executive and non-executive officers that accepted a reduction in salary as part of our cost reduction initiative in November 2022 also received an additional option grant in recognition of the reduced salary level in December 2022, shortly after the announcement of the cost reduction initiative. During fiscal 2023, the Compensation Committee approved grants to our named executive officers of options to purchase the following number of shares of our common stock: Name Shares Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250,000 Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60,000 60,000 Unlike options granted to our non-officer employees, which vest in four annual installments, options granted to our executive and non-executive officers generally vest in their entirety four years after the anniversary date of the officer’s commencement of employment that is closest to the date of grant, subject to the officer’s continued service. Options granted in December 2022 in recognition of the reduced salary levels vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Each of these option grants provides a return to the officer only if he remains employed by us during the respective vesting period, and then only if the market price of the shares appreciates over the option term. The Compensation Committee believes the four-year vesting schedule deters risk taking and further focuses management on building long-term stockholder value. The value of the shares subject to the fiscal 2023 option grants to named executive officers are reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” below, and further information about these grants is contained in the “Fiscal 2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table below. Executive Retention and Severance Plan On September 30, 2014, the Compensation Committee adopted the Executive Retention and Severance Plan (the “Retention Plan”) and on August 29, 2017 and August 27, 2020 extended the term of the Plan by an additional three years such that the Retention Plan will expire on September 30, 2023. The purpose of the Retention Plan is to mitigate some of the risk that exists for executives working in an environment where GSI Technology could be acquired or the subject of another transaction that would result in a change in its control. The severance benefits provided by the Retention Plan are intended to encourage the continued dedication of our executive officers and key employees during a period of unrest, notwithstanding a possible change in control. The change in control arrangements is also intended to mitigate potential disincentives to the consideration of a transaction that would result in a change in control, particularly where the services of the participants may not be required by a potential acquirer. The Retention Plan and amounts potentially payable thereunder are described in more detail below under “Potential Payments Upon Change of Control.” Inter-Relationship of Components of Compensation Packages The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy that the aggregate compensation of our executive officers (composed of base compensation, variable cash compensation and equity awards) should approximate the median aggregate compensation paid by our peer companies to officers performing comparable functions. Except for this policy, the various components of our executive officers’ compensation generally are not inter-related. Adjustments to our executive officers’ base compensation are primarily based on our financial performance, our annual company-wide compensation survey and review of peer company compensation levels. As we have relied on long-term equity incentives for a portion of our total compensation package, option grants for our executive officers are generally considered each year. If the value of options that are granted in one year is reduced due to a reduction in the value of the underlying common stock, the size of the option grants for the next year are not affected. Similarly, if the value of previously granted options increases significantly, the amount of compensation to be awarded for the next year is not affected. While the Compensation Committee has discretion to make exceptions to existing compensation arrangements, it has not approved any exceptions to such arrangements with regard to any named executive officers. 24 Other Benefits Our executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as our medical, dental, vision, group life, disability, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance and our simplified employee pension plan, in each case on the same basis as our other employees. Aside from a $5,400 car allowance provided to Mr. Lasserre, there were no special benefits or perquisites provided to any named executive officer in fiscal 2023. Accounting for Executive Compensation We account for equity compensation paid to our employees under authorization guidance for stock- based compensation which requires us to measure and record an expense over the service period of the award. Accounting rules also require us to record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is incurred. Tax Considerations We intend to consider the impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in determining the mix of elements of future executive compensation. This section limits the deductibility of non-performance based compensation paid to each of our named executive officers (other than our Chief Financial Officer) to $1 million annually. The stock options granted to our executive officers have been intended to qualify as performance-based compensation exempt from the limitation on deductibility. As a result of changes in December 2017 to federal tax laws, we expect that stock options granted or other compensation provided under arrangements entered into or materially modified after November 2, 2017 generally will not be deductible to the extent they result in compensation to certain executive officers that exceeds $1 million in any one year for any such officer. Due to uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m), including the scope of the transition relief under the legislation repealing the exemption the Section 162(m) deduction limit, no assurance can be given that compensation intended to satisfy the requirements for exemption in fact will do so. Salaries and bonuses do not qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). Other Compensation-Related Policies Our insider trading policy applies to shares of our common stock held by our directors, officers and other employees, including shares issued pursuant to equity-based awards. The policy prohibits our directors, executive officers and other employees from, among other things: • engaging in short sales of our stock; • engaging in transactions in derivative securities involving our stock; • hedging their ownership position in our stock; and • holding our stock in a margin account or pledging our stock as collateral for a loan. Compensation Committee Report We, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of GSI Technology, Inc., have reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement and discussed it with management. Based on such review and discussions, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in GSI Technology, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Elizabeth Cholawsky (Chair) Jack A. Bradley Haydn Hsieh Ruey L. Lu 25 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Summary Compensation Table The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 by our Chief Executive Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers, determined as of March 31, 2023: Name and Principal Position Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . President and Chief Executive Officer Douglas M. Schirle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vice President, Sales Year 2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 2023 2022 2021 Salary ($) 388,721 431,912 431,912 296,373 306,593 306,593 311,955 322,712 322,712 Option Awards ($)(1) 341,545 233,630 224,440 94,446 93,452 89,776 94,446 93,452 89,776 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) All Other Compensation ($) — 410,681(2) 62,500(3) — 205,340(4) 31,250(5) — 205,340(4) 31,250(5) — — — — — — 5,400(6) 5,400(6) 5,400(6) Total ($) 730,266 1,076,223 718,852 390,819 605,385 427,619 411,801 626,904 449,138 (1) As required by SEC rules, amounts shown in the column entitled “Option Awards” present the aggregate grant date fair value of option grants made each year computed in accordance with authoritative guidance. These amounts do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized or will realize a financial benefit from the option award. The assumptions used with respect to the valuation of option grants are set forth in Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. Under generally accepted accounting principles, compensation expense with respect to option awards granted to our employees and directors is generally recognized over the vesting periods applicable to the awards. (2) Earned under the 2022 Variable Compensation Plan, of which $246,409 was paid in June 2022, $82,136 was paid in June 2023 and $82,136 will be vested and payable on the last day of April 2024. (3) Earned under the 2021 Variable Compensation Plan, of which $37,500 was paid in May 2021, $12,500 was paid in June 2022 and $12,500 was paid in June 2023. (4) Earned under the 2022 Variable Compensation Plan, of which $123,204 was paid in June 2022, $41,068 was paid in June 2023 and $41,068 will be vested and payable on the last day of April 2024. (5) Earned under the 2021 Variable Compensation Plan, of which $18,750 was paid in May 2021, $6,250 was paid in June 2022 and $6,250 was paid in June 2023. (6) Represents Mr. Lasserre’s car allowance of $5,400. Grants of Plan-Based Awards The following table sets forth certain information with respect to plan-based awards granted during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 to our named executive officers: Name Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . Grant Date 8/1/22 12/2/22 8/1/22 12/2/22 8/1/22 12/2/22 Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) Maximum Target Threshold ($) ($) ($) 250,000 — 500,000 — — 125,000 — — — 125,000 — — — 250,000 — 250,000 — All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) 100,000(3) — 150,000(4) 40,000(5) 20,000(4) 40,000(7) 20,000(4) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($) 4.08 2.27 4.08 2.27 4.08 2.27 Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards ($)(2) 183,400 158,145 73,360 21,086 73,360 21,086 26 (1) Represents the range of potential cash bonuses payable under the 2023 Variable Compensation Plan, as more fully described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2023 Variable Compensation Plan.” There was no threshold or minimum amount payable under the Plan. (2) Reflects the grant date fair value of each equity award in accordance with authoritative guidance. The assumptions used in the calculation of this amount are included in Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2023. (3) Option granted pursuant to the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. This option vests 100% on April 13, 2026. (4) Option granted pursuant to the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. This option vests 100% on December 2, 2023. (5) Option granted pursuant to the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. This option vests 100% on June 3, 2026. (6) Option granted pursuant to the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. This option vests 100% on May 3, 2026. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the value of all unexercised options previously awarded to our named executive officers as of March 31, 2023: Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000 25,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 — — — — — 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 — — — — — Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 — — — — — — — 100,000(1) 100,000(2) 100,000(3) 100,000(4) 150,000(5) — — — — — — 40,000(6) 40,000(7) 40,000(8) 40,000(9) 20,000(5) 5.76 6.86 5.23 4.98 4.99 7.26 6.70 8.30 5.83 5.58 4.08 2.27 6.86 5.23 4.98 4.99 7.26 6.70 8.30 5.83 5.58 4.08 2.27 5/6/23 7/29/23 8/11/24 8/3/25 8/1/26 7/31/27 7/30/28 7/29/29 8/3/30 8/2/31 8/1/32 12/2/32 7/29/23 8/11/24 8/3/25 8/1/26 7/31/27 7/30/28 7/29/29 8/3/30 8/2/31 8/1/32 12/2/32 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t Name Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date 15,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 — — — — — — — — — — — 40,000(10) 40,000(11) 40,000(12) 40,000(13) 20,000(5) 6.86 5.23 4.98 4.99 7.26 6.70 8.30 5.83 5.58 4.08 2.27 7/29/23 8/11/24 8/3/25 8/1/26 7/31/27 7/30/28 7/29/29 8/3/30 8/2/31 8/1/32 12/2/32 (1) Option vested 100% on April 13, 2023. (2) Option vests 100% on April 13, 2024. (3) Option vests 100% on April 13, 2025. (4) Option vests 100% on April 13, 2026. (5) Option vests 100% on December 2, 2023. (6) Option vested 100% on June 3, 2023. (7) Option vests 100% on June 3, 2024. (8) Option vests 100% on June 3, 2025. (9) Option vests 100% on June 3, 2026. (10) Option vested 100% on May 3, 2023. (11) Option vests 100% on May 3, 2024. (12) Option vests 100% on May 3, 2025. (13) Option vests 100% on May 3, 2026. Option Exercises and Stock Vested During Last Fiscal Year There were no options exercised by our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. We have not made any direct grants of stock awards to any of our employees. Accordingly, there was no vesting of restricted stock held by any named executive officers during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. Potential Payments Upon Change of Control Our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our Executive Retention and Severance Plan (the “Retention Plan”). Participants in the Retention Plan are entitled to receive severance benefits upon an “involuntary termination” of their employment other than for “cause” or a voluntary termination for “good reason” during a period beginning two months prior to and ending two years following a “change in control,” as such terms are defined in the Retention Plan. Benefits payable under the Retention Plan consist of the following (in addition to all other compensation and benefits accrued at the time of the participant’s termination): 28 • A lump sum cash payment equal to: (i) the greater of 18 months of base salary or one month’s salary for each full or partial year of service for the Chief Executive Officer; (ii) the greater of 12 months of base salary or one month’s salary for each full or partial year of service for other executive officers; and (iii) 12 months of base salary or such lesser amount as the Compensation Committee may specify for other participants; • a lump sum cash payment of all bonuses earned by the participant in prior fiscal years but not vested and payable at the time of termination; • a lump sum cash payment of the pro rata portion of the participant’s bonus or anticipated bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (calculated as provided in the Plan) and 150% of such amount in the case of the Chief Executive Officer; • Medical, dental, vision and life insurance benefits for the same period covered by the participant’s base salary benefit; and • 100% acceleration of the participant’s equity awards assumed by an acquirer in connection with a change in control, effective upon termination (100% acceleration effective upon the change in control for awards not assumed). Benefits under the Retention Plan are subject to withholding of applicable income and employment taxes. Participants are not entitled to any tax “gross up” in respect of excise taxes, if any, that might arise under the “parachute payment” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and may be subject to a reduction in benefits if any such excise tax were applicable and the reduced benefit would maximize the net after-tax payment to the participant. No severance or change of control payments were made to any of our executive officers in fiscal 2023. The following table summarizes amounts that would have been payable to our named executive officers upon a termination of their employment qualifying for benefits under the Retention Plan, assuming that such termination had occurred on March 31, 2023: Cash Severance Payment Name Based on Salary Based on Bonus Continued Health Benefits(1) Acceleration of Stock Options(2) Total Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,043,787 $176,772 $ 81,527 $ — $1,302,086 Douglas M. Schirle . . . . . . . . . . . Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 613,186 699,209 88,386 88,386 94,429 102,298 — — 796,001 889,893 (1) Represents the aggregate premium payments required to provide continued health insurance coverage under COBRA, based on the officer’s health insurance coverage in effect as of March 31, 2023. (2) The value of the acceleration of stock options is calculated by multiplying (x) the number of shares subject to acceleration by (y) the difference between the fair market value of a share of our common stock on March 31, 2023 ($1.72) and the per share exercise price of the unvested shares subject to acceleration. No options were in-the-money as of March 31, 2023. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t 29 Compensation of Directors Our policy for the compensation of non-employee directors provides that non-employee directors are entitled to receive annual cash retainers as follows: Board Lead Director Audit Committee: • Chair • Other Members Compensation Committee: • Chair • Other Members Nominating and Governance Committee: • Chair • Other Members $40,000 $20,000 $20,000 $7,500 $10,000 $5,000 $7,500 $3,000 Pursuant to the terms of our option grant policy, each non-employee director receives an option to purchase a number of shares of our common stock having a fair market value equal to the aggregate amount of the annual cash retainer payable to such director for service on the Board and its committees. The table below summarizes the compensation we paid to our directors that are not named executive officers for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 with respect to their services as a director. Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Option Awards ($)(1)(2)(3) Jack A. Bradley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Elizabeth Cholawsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Haydn Hsieh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kim Le . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ruey L. Lu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Barbara Nelson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert Yau(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82,201 59,766 52,500 42,391(4) 48,000 48,804 — 37,770 25,023 24,787 28,328 22,662 23,843 — Total ($) 119,971 84,789 77,287 70,719 70,662 72,647 — (1) Valuation based on the dollar amount recognized during fiscal 2023 for financial statement reporting purposes pursuant to authoritative guidance, giving effect to service based vesting conditions, but disregarding the estimate of forfeitures related to such vesting conditions. These amounts do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized or will realize a financial benefit from the option award. The assumptions used with respect to the valuation of option grants are set forth in Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. (2) On October 31, 2022, Mr. Bradley, Dr. Cholawsky, Mr. Hsieh, Ms. Le, Mr. Lu and Ms. Nelson were granted options to purchase 42,780, 28,342, 28,074, 32,085, 25,668 and 27,005 shares, respectively, that will be fully vested on August 15, 2023. The grant date fair value of each of these options was $37,770, $25,023, $24,787, $28,328, $22,662 and $23,843, respectively. As Ms. Le resigned from the board on December 15, 2022, her option grant was canceled. (3) As of March 31, 2023, each director that is not a named executive officer had the following number of shares underlying outstanding options: Mr. Bradley: 111,748; Dr. Cholawsky: 55,821; Mr. Hsieh: 95,299; Mr. Lu: 88,500; Ms. Nelson: 34,738; and Mr. Yau: 470,000. (4) Reflects fees earned by Ms. Le from April 1, 2022 through December 15, 2022, the date Ms. Le resigned from the board. 30 (5) Mr. Yau is an employee of the Company, and therefore no additional compensation is provided to Mr. Yau for his services as a director. Equity Compensation Plan Information We currently maintain three compensation plans that provide for the issuance of our common stock to officers and other employees, directors and consultants. These consist of the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”) and the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”), each of which has been approved by stockholders. The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options and shares reserved for future issuance under the foregoing plans as of March 31, 2023: Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding shares reflected in column (a)) (c) Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,809,160 $5.62 4,759,850(1)(2) (1) Includes 1,164,999 shares available for future issuance under the Purchase Plan. (2) A total of 10,000,000 shares of common stock have been authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan, of which 3,594,851 were available for grant as of March 31, 2023. Appropriate adjustments will be made in the number of authorized shares and other numerical limits in the 2016 Plan and in outstanding awards to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights in the event of a stock split or other change in our capital structure. Shares subject to awards which expire or are cancelled or forfeited will again become available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. The shares available will not be reduced by awards settled in cash or by shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. Only the net number of shares issued upon the exercise of stock appreciation rights or options exercised by means of a net exercise or by tender of previously owned shares will be deducted from the shares available under the 2016 Plan. P r o x y S t a t e m e n t 31 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following: (1) tabular executive compensation disclosure for our principal executive officer, our other named executive officers, and company performance for the fiscal years listed below and (2) additional disclosure relative to the relationship between the “Compensation Actually Paid” set forth in the Pay versus Performance Table and each of the performance metrics set forth in the Pay versus Performance Table, in each case over our fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2023. Our Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for either of the years shown. For further information concerning our pay-for- performance philosophy and how we structure our executive compensation to drive and reward performance, refer to the section above entitled “Executive Compensation”. The amounts shown for “Compensation Actually Paid” have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by our named executive officers for any of the periods listed. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table total compensation with certain adjustments as described in the following table and footnotes. GSI Technology Pay Versus Performance Year(1) Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(2) Compensation Actually Paid for PEO(3) 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . $ 730,266 $292,681 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . $1,076,223 $472,737 Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(2) $401,310 $591,858 Average Compensation Actually Paid for Non-PEO NEOs(4) $245,877 $353,027 Total Shareholder Return (Value of $100 Initial Investment on 3/31/21)(5) $26 $57 Net Income (Loss)(6) ($15,977,000) ($16,368,000) (1) Lee-Lean Shu served as the Company’s Principal Executive (our “PEO”) for the entirety of 2022 and 2023 and the Company’s NEOs other than our PEO (the “Reported NEOs”) for the indicated fiscal years were as follows: — 2023: Douglas M. Schirle and Didier Lasserre — 2022: Douglas M. Schirle, Didier Lasserre, Robert Yau, and Ping Wu (2) Amounts reported in these columns represent (i) the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year in the case of Lee-Lean Shu and (ii) the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the Reported NEOs in the indicated year for such years. (3) Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to our PEO for the indicated fiscal year, as calculated under Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K based on his total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal years and adjusted as shown in the table below: PEO +/- - + + + Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years Fair Value at Vesting of Option Awards Granted in 2022 $1,076,223 $233,630 2023 $730,266 $341,545 $119,217 $142,783 ($498,963) ($228,557) $0 $0 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 32 +/- + - = PEO Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year 2022 2023 (f) $9,890 ($10,266) (g) $0 $0 Compensation Actually Paid $472,737 $292,681 (a) Represents Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year. (b) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards granted to our PEO during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (c) Represents the aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal year-end of our PEO’s outstanding and unvested option awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (d) Represents the aggregate change in fair value (measured from the prior fiscal year-end) during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested option awards held by our PEO as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (e) Represents the aggregate fair value at vesting of the option awards that were granted to our PEO and vested during the indicated fiscal year (of which there happened to be none for 2022 or 2023) (f) Represents the aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year-end to the vesting date, of each option award held by our PEO that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (g) Represents the aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of our PEO’s option awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year (of which there happened to be none for 2022 or 2023) (4) Amounts reported in this column represent the compensation actually paid to the Reported NEOs in the indicated fiscal year, as calculated under Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K based on the average total compensation for such NEOs reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the indicated fiscal year and adjusted as shown in the table below: +/- - + + + + NEO Average Summary Compensation Table – Total Compensation Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year Fair Value at Fiscal Year End of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years Fair Value at Vesting of Option Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested During Fiscal Year Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Satisfied During Fiscal Year 33 2022 $591,858 $87,611 2023 $401,310 $94,446 $44,706 $29,951 ($187,111) ($91,423) $0 ($8,815) $0 $485 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) P r o x y S t a t e m e n t +/- - Fair Value as of Prior Fiscal Year End of Option Awards Granted in Prior Fiscal Years That Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During Fiscal Year NEO Average 2022 2023 (g) $0 $0 = Compensation Actually Paid $353,027 $245,877 Please see footnote 1 for the Reported NEOs included in the average for each indicated fiscal year. (a) Represents the average Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the Reported NEOs in the indicated fiscal year. (b) Represents the average aggregate grant date fair value of the option awards granted to the Reported NEOs during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (c) Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the indicated fiscal year-end of the Reported NEOs’ outstanding and unvested option awards granted during such fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (d) Represents the average aggregate change in fair value (measured from the prior fiscal year-end) during the indicated fiscal year of the outstanding and unvested option awards held by the Reported NEOs as of the last day of the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (e) Represents the average aggregate fair value at vesting of the option awards that were granted to the Reported NEOs and vested during the indicated fiscal year (of which there happened to be none for 2022 or 2023). (f) Represents the average aggregate change in fair value, measured from the prior fiscal year-end to the vesting date, of each option award held by the Reported NEOs that was granted in a prior fiscal year and which vested during the indicated fiscal year, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (g) Represents the average aggregate fair value as of the last day of the prior fiscal year of the Reported NEOs’ option awards that were granted in a prior fiscal year and which failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions in the indicated fiscal year (of which there happened to be none for 2022 or 2023). (5) Pursuant to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, this calculation assumes $100 was invested in our common stock on March 31, 2021, the last day of our fiscal year 2021, using the closing stock price at the end of that day, and shows the value of such invested amount on each of March 31, 2022 and 2023. Historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. (6) The dollar amounts represent the amount of net income (loss) attributable to GSI Technology as reflected in our audited financial statements for the applicable fiscal year. Relationship Between Pay and Performance We believe “Compensation Actually Paid” over 2022 and 2023 is reflective of our Compensation Committee’s emphasis on aligning pay and performance given “Compensation Actually Paid” declined year- over-year and was lower in both 2022 and 2023 than the total pay reported in our Summary Compensation table, largely driven by our stock price performance and reflecting the emphasis on the use of equity awards in our executive compensation program. The following charts illustrate the relationship between pay and performance, as calculated per Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K: 34 Compensation Actually Paid vs. TSR Compensa(cid:2)on Actually Paid to PEO Average Compensa(cid:2)on Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs GSI Technology Total Shareholder Return $600 2022 2023 $500 $473 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 $600 $400 $200 $0 -$200 -$400 -$600 $353 $57 $293 $246 $26 Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Loss Compensa(cid:2)on Actually Paid to PEO Average Compensa(cid:2)on Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs GSI Technology Net Loss 2022 $473 $353 2023 $293 $246 -$16 -$16 35 ) 0 0 0 $ ( d a P y l l i a u t c A n o i t a s n e p m o C ) 0 0 0 $ ( d a P y l l i a u t c A n o i t a s n e p m o C $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 ) R S T ( t n e m t s e v n I 0 0 1 $ l a i t i n I f o e u a V l P r o x y S t a t e m e n t $60 $40 $20 $0 -$20 -$40 -$60 ) s n o i l l i M $ ( s s o L t e N RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Audit Committee Charter, our executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders, including their immediate family members and affiliates, are prohibited from entering into a related party transaction with us without the prior consent of our Audit Committee which reviews and approves any related party transactions. We have entered into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors containing provisions that may require us, among other things, to indemnify our officers and directors against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as officers or directors and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. Other Transactions For information regarding the grant of stock options to our directors and executive officers, please see “Executive Compensation — Compensation of Directors” and “Executive Compensation — Grants of Plan- Based Awards, — Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End and — Potential Payments Upon Change of Control.” 36 PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP BY MANAGEMENT The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2023 certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of GSI Technology’s common stock by (i) each stockholder known by GSI Technology to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of GSI Technology’s common stock, (ii) each director and director nominee of GSI Technology, (iii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of GSI Technology as a group: Beneficial Owner(1) Principal Stockholders: AIGH Capital Management, LLC, AIGH Investment Partners, LLC and Oren Hirschman(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6006 Berkeley Avenue Baltimore, MD 21209 Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(2) Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned(3) 2,000,000 8.0 Roumell Asset Management, LLC and James C. Roumell(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,724,989 6.9 2 Wisconsin Circle, Suite 700 Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Jing Rong Tang(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,525,141 6.1 c/o HolyStone Enterprises Co., Ltd. 1FL No. 62, Sec 2 Huang Shan Road Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C Directors, Named Executive Officers and certain Executive Officers: Lee-Lean Shu(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jack A. Bradley(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Elizabeth Cholawsky(9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Haydn Hsieh(10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ruey L. Lu(11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Barbara Nelson(12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert Yau(13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Didier Lasserre(14) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Douglas M. Schirle(15) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All executive officers and directors as a group (14 persons)(16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,239,615 12.6 119,748 57,171 107,416 141,000 34,738 1,231,439 515,321 340,625 8,195,605 * * * * * 4.9 2.0 1.3 32.1 * Less than 1.0% (1) The address for those individuals and entities not otherwise indicated is 1213 Elko Drive, Sunnyvale, California 94089. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and to the information contained in the other footnotes to this table. (2) Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares that can be acquired by such person within 60 days upon the exercise of options. (3) Calculated on the basis of 25,083,143 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2023, provided that any additional shares of common stock that a stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days after June 30, 2023 are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of calculating that stockholder’s percentage beneficial ownership. (4) Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on May 15, 2023. Includes 2,000,000 shares deemed to be held by AIGH Capital Management, LLC, AIGH Investment Partners, LLC and Oren Hirschman. 37 P r o x y S t a t e m e n t (5) Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 20, 2023. Includes: 1,715,989 shares deemed to be held by Roumell Asset Management, LLC (“RAM”) solely as a result of its discretionary power over such shares as investment adviser to the Roumell Opportunistic Value Fund (the “Fund”); and 8,400 shares held directly by James C. Roumell (“Roumell”). Roumell is President of RAM and holds a controlling percentage of its outstanding voting securities and, as a result of his position with and ownership of securities of RAM, Roumell may be deemed the beneficial owner of the shares beneficially owned by RAM. (6) Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022. Mr. Tang has sole voting and investment power with respect to 1,010,000 of such shares and shared voting and investment power with respect to 515,141 of such shares. Of such 515,141 shares, this includes: 47,000 shares held by HolyStone Enterprises Co., Ltd., of which Mr. Tang is Chief Executive Officer; and 468,141 shares held by Koowin Co., Ltd., of which Mr. Tang is a director. Mr. Tang disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. (7) (8) (9) Includes: 625,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023; 13,600 shares held by Mr. Shu’s children; 530,939 shares held by Mr. Shu’s spouse; and 87,659 shares issuable upon exercise of options held by his spouse that are exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2023. Includes 111,748 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. Includes 55,821 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. (10) Includes 86,416 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. (11) Includes 88.500 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. (12) Includes 34,738 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023 (13) Includes 250,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023 and 4,000 shares held by Mr. Yau’s spouse. (14) Includes 215,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. (15) Includes 280,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. (16) Includes an aggregate of 3,059,957 shares issuable upon exercise of options that are exercisable within 60 days following June 30, 2023. 38 STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE PRESENTED AT NEXT ANNUAL MEETING Stockholder proposals may be included in our proxy materials for an annual meeting so long as they are provided to us on a timely basis and satisfy the other conditions set forth in applicable SEC rules and our bylaws. For a stockholder proposal to be included in our proxy materials for the 2024 annual meeting in accordance with SEC rules and our bylaws, the proposal must be received at our principal executive offices, addressed to the Secretary, not later than March 20, 2024. Submitting a stockholder proposal does not guarantee that we will include it in our proxy statement. Our Nominating and Governance Committee reviews all stockholder proposals and makes recommendations to the board for actions on such proposals. For information on qualifications of director nominees considered by our Nominating and Governance committee, see the “Corporate Governance” section of this proxy statement. TRANSACTION OF OTHER BUSINESS At the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be conducted at the 2023 Annual Meeting other than as described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matter or matters are properly brought before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the proxy on such matters in accordance with their best judgment. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K A copy of our annual report on Form 10-K (without exhibits) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 is being distributed along with this proxy statement. We refer you to such report for financial and other information about us, but such report is not incorporated in this proxy statement and is not deemed to be a part of the proxy solicitation material. It is also available on our website at www.gsitechnology.com. In addition, the report (with exhibits) is available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. July 17, 2023 Robert Yau Secretary P r o x y S t a t e m e n t 39 (This page has been left blank intentionally.) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-33387 GSI Technology, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 77-0398779 (IRS Employer Identification No.) 1213 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, California 94089 (Address of principal executive offices, zip code) (408) 331-8800 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Common Stock, $0.001 par value Trading Symbol(s) GSIT Name of Each Exchange on which Registered The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the common stock on September 30, 2022, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market, was approximately $55.4 million. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by each officer and director and each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock of the registrant have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. As of May 31, 2023, there were 25,016,627 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2023 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. A n n u a l R e p o r t GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2023 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 2. Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 3. Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 4. Page 3 17 35 35 36 36 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 6. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 8. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. PART IV Item 15. Item 16. Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Form 10-K Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIGNATURES 36 36 36 37 48 49 87 87 88 88 89 89 89 89 89 89 90 90 93 94 2 Forward-looking Statements In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will,” and other similar expressions. In addition, any statements which refer to expectations, projections, or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth in this report under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors,” those described elsewhere in this report, and those described in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements after the filing of this report. You are urged to review carefully and consider our various disclosures in this report and in our other reports publicly disclosed or filed with the SEC that attempt to advise you of the risks and factors that may affect our business. Item 1. Business Overview PART I GSI provides in-place associative computing solutions for applications in high growth markets such as artificial intelligence (“AI”) and high-performance computing (“HPC”), including natural language processing and computer vision. Our associative processing unit (“APU”) products are focused on applications using similarity search. Similarity search is used in visual search queries for ecommerce, computer vision, drug discovery, cyber security and service markets such as NoSQL, Elasticsearch, and OpenSearch. Our extensive historical experience in developing high speed synchronous static random access memory, or SRAM, facilitated our ability to transform the focus of our business to the development of reliable hardware AI products and solutions like the APU. Even as we expand our offering of in-place associative computing solutions, we continue to be committed to the synchronous SRAM market, by making available exceedingly high density performance memory products for incorporation into high-performance networking and telecommunications equipment, such as routers, switches, wide area network infrastructure equipment, wireless base stations and network access equipment. Our position in the synchronous SRAM market is well established and we have long-term supplier relationships with many of the leading original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, customers including Nokia. The revenue generated by these sales of high-speed synchronous SRAM products is being used to finance the development of our new in-place associative computing solutions and new types of SRAM products. We also serve the ongoing needs of the military/defense and aerospace markets by offering robust high-quality radiation-tolerant and radiation-hardened space grade SRAMs in addition to new in-place associative computing solutions including synthetic aperture radar (“SAR”) image processing. We utilize a fabless business model for the manufacture of our APU and SRAM products, which allows us both to focus our resources on research and development, product design and marketing, and to gain access to advanced process technologies with only modest capital investment and fixed costs. GSI’s fiscal year 2023 net revenue decreased by 11% compared to net revenue in fiscal year 2022, reflecting an easing of the semiconductor supply chain shortage that previously caused customers to purchase extra buffer stock of GSI’s products coupled with its customers continuing to work through the remaining levels of their past A n n u a l R e p o r t 3 buffer stock purchases, the impact of rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment, all of which resulted in a decline in demand for our SRAM products and delays in completing the productization of our APU products. GSI’s gross margin improved by 4.0% compared to the prior fiscal year, reflecting increased sales of higher-margin products and our ability to manage supply chain challenges and increased costs brought on by the pandemic. Despite the difficult financial climate in fiscal 2023, our first-place wins in the MAFAT challenge and the Mobile Standoff Autonomous Indoor Capabilities (“MoSAIC”) challenge have given GSI high-profile exposure to the leading agencies in the Israeli and American military and defense organizations allowing us to pursue opportunities such as our proof of concept order from Elta Systems Ltd, a subsidiary of Israeli Aerospace Industries, which funded a SAR image processing acceleration system based on our APU technology. In June 2023, we announced the receipt of an award of a prototype agreement with the Space Development Agency (“SDA”) for the development of a Next-Generation Associative Processing Unit-2 (“APU2”) for Enhanced Space-Based Capabilities. Our next-generation non-Von-Neumann Associative Processing Unit compute in-memory integrated circuit (“IC”) offers unique capabilities to address the challenges faced by the U.S. Space Force (“USSF”) in processing extensive sets of big data in space. Our overarching objective is to enable and enhance current and future mission capabilities through the deployment of compute in-memory integrated systems that can efficiently handle vast amounts of data in real-time at the edge. The APU, featuring a scalable format, compact footprint, and low power consumption, presents an ideal solution for edge applications where prompt and precise responses are crucial. These capabilities empower the USSF to swiftly detect, warn, analyze, attribute, and forecast potential and actual threats in space, ultimately bolstering the ability of the United States to maintain and leverage space superiority. The U.S. Space Force is actively seeking solutions to address current limitations in processing big data that is needed to execute the mission objectives of the Space Development Agency within the evolving and challenging space environment. This award will be funded by the Small Business Innovation Research program, a competitive program funded by various U.S. government agencies, that encourages small businesses to engage in federal research and development with the potential for commercialization. Under the terms of this Direct to Phase II award, we will develop an advanced non-Von-Neumann Associative Processing Unit-2, compute in-memory IC, and design and fabricate an APU2 Evaluation Board. Pursuant to an agreed-upon schedule, we will receive milestone payments totaling an estimated $1.25 million upon the successful completion of predetermined milestones. We are marketing our OpenSearch Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) acceleration platform to strategic customers and intend to support Amazon Web Services (“AWS”), Azure, or Google Cloud Storage (“GCS”) users with fast vector search acceleration with a software plugin. We support customers with prebuilt APIs and libraries to support their parallel programming of the Gemini APU in C, C++. The software stack accelerates development by providing an integrated framework environment for the compute-in-memory as well as host, and management code modules. In calendar 2023, we plan on releasing an update to this compiler stack framework allowing customers to write their applications in Python, taking advantage of groundbreaking speed and debug advantages of L-Python. In the first quarter of fiscal 2023, we started a program with a major prime contractor for a radiation-hardened SRAM prototype that shipped in the first half of fiscal 2023 and has prospects for increasing GSI’s net revenue in fiscal 2024 and beyond. We were incorporated in California in 1995 under the name Giga Semiconductor, Inc. We changed our name to GSI Technology in December 2003 and reincorporated in Delaware in June 2004 under the name GSI Technology, Inc. Our principal executive offices are located at 1213 Elko Drive, Sunnyvale, California, 94089, and our telephone number is (408) 331-8800. 4 Industry and Market Strategy Associative Processing Unit Computing Market Overview The markets for associating processing computing solutions are significant and growing rapidly. The total addressable market (“TAM”) for APU search applications, which is the market where GSI is focusing its commercialization efforts, has been determined by GSI to be approximately $232 billion in 2023, and growing at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 13% to $380 billion by 2027. GSI has similarly determined that the Serviceable Available Market (“SAM”) for APU search applications is approximately $7.1 billion in 2023, and anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 16% to $12.8 billion by 2027. The search market segments included in GSI’s TAM and SAM analyses include vector search HPC. Some market applications in these segments are computer vision, synthetic aperture radar, drug discovery, and cybersecurity; and service markets such as NoSQL, Elasticsearch, and OpenSearch. The growth in demand for associative processing computing solutions is being driven by the increasing market adoption and usage of graphics processing unit (“GPU”) and CPU farms for AI processing of large data collections, including parallel computing in scientific research. However, the large-scale usage of GPU and CPU farms for AI processing of data is demonstrating the limits of GPU and CPU processing speeds and resulting in ever higher energy consumption. The amounts of data being processed, which is coming from increasing numbers of users and continuously increasing amounts of collected data, has resulted in efforts to split and store the processed data among multiple databases, through a process called sharding. Sharding substantially increases processing costs and worsens the power consumption factors associated with processing so much data. As the environmental impacts of data processing are becoming increasingly important, and complex workloads are migrating to edge computing for real-time applications, it is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve market demands for low power, smaller footprints and faster results. The GSI APU has been demonstrated to outperform CPU’s and GPU’s in the market for AI search of large data collections by providing lower latency and increased capacity in a smaller form-factor and achieve such results with lower power consumption. In addition, GSI’s compute-in-place technology has wide application. The APU has several benefits that are particularly useful to overcoming the data processing challenges noted above. First, the APU does not have the word size limitation of traditional CPU and GPU processors. Because traditional data processors move data around to various parts of a system, they need to select or duplicate resources of particular word sizes, be they 8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit or 64-bit. The APU is based on a memory line structure, which means the APU can operate on legacy instruction widths of 8 or 16-bits, or just as seamlessly operate on instructions of arbitrary widths from 1 bit to 768-bits or 2048-bits. The APU can operate on any word width that makes sense for the problem and also for what makes sense at the current processing step. This dynamic flexibility is a tremendous advantage for non-linear processing like trigonometry. The APU is also an associative machine, which means that data that is resident in the device can be applied to a function only if it is deemed associated (for example, with a meta-tag) to the processing. Such processing is similar to a person looking for his car in a parking lot, but ignoring all cars that are not the color of his car. Another strength of the APU design is that it is multi-threaded. One sensor or query input can be simultaneously applied to multiple functions or searches in the device. Our associative computing technology utilizes in-memory associative processor structures to address the bottlenecks that limit performance and increase power consumption in CPUs, GPUs, and Field Programable Gate Arrays (“FPGAs”) when processing large datasets. By constantly having to move operands and results in and out of devices with ever increasing processing speeds and bus speeds, current solutions are focused on memory transfers rather than addressing the basic computation problem. By changing the computational framework to parallel processing and having search functions conducted directly in a processing memory array, the APU can greatly expedite computation and response times in many “big data” applications. We are creating a new category of 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t computing products that are expected to have substantial target markets and a large new customer base in those markets. Our commercialization efforts for the APU product are focused on markets where the APU shows factors of improvement against CPU or GPU-only systems. The APU differentiates itself most for similarity search, multi- modal vector search, real-time very large database search, and several scientific high-performance computing workloads processing sensor data. The APU’s improved performance over CPU or GPU systems provides a paradigm-shifting ability to process data in real-time. As a result, we see demand for the APU in artificial intelligence applications, including approximate nearest neighbor searches, natural language processing, cryptography, and synthetic aperture radar as well as other fields whose processing in the datacenter can benefit from the APU’s smaller footprint, superior productivity, and low system power consumption. GSI is currently in development and field testing with potential customers in the computer vision, synthetic aperture radar, and cybersecurity market segments. We have a solution to accelerate multimodal vector search as an on-prem or SaaS solution for OpenSearch and Fast Vector Search (“FVS”). Our expectations of demand for the APU have been supported by comparisons of the power usage for processing large area SAR image in real-time at high resolution. In one comparison, the APU used on average 93% less power than CPU or GPU systems. Similarity search uses a technique called distance metric learning, in which learning algorithms measure how similar related objects are. The APU is well suited for very fast similarity search because its design determines distance metric at fast computation speeds with high degrees of accuracy. Our APU is further differentiated from other solutions in the market by its scalability for very large datasets. The APU has demonstrated its ability to increase the rate of computation for visual search by orders of magnitude with greater accuracy and reduced power consumption. The APU also adds multi-modal search capability to this computational performance. For instance, the ability to search on a picture of a product on an ecommerce website, with pricing and specific filters, does not impede the performance of the in-memory search versus a traditional text only search. This kind of performance has the potential to transform online retailers’ capabilities to run search queries and improve customers’ online shopping experience. The APU’s higher speeds and increased accuracy in similarity search has been shown to speed drug discovery, which can potentially lower drug discovery costs, an important consideration for research organizations dependent on funding. The APU is well suited for enhancing drug discovery work because it can perform similarity searches using very descriptive molecular representations in a virtual environment. The APU’s ability to process word lengths of 2000-8000 bits can significantly reduce the cost of developing drugs by allowing virtual screening and more effective use of physical laboratory resources. Use of AI products like the APU could reduce costs, increase drug efficacy and safety, and increase speed to market thereby potentially saving billions of dollars. For these reasons, the APU is drawing interest from prospective customers in the pharmaceutical and genomics industries. New Markets for the APU The APU is capable of processing large data arrays in a cost competitive solution for large database similarity search, but the mathematical capabilities of the APU also create new opportunities for using real-time causal processing. Examples of real-time causal processing are SAR, image re-registration, and mathematical structural similarity index measure (“SSIM”). This combination of sensor processing, image processing, and computer vision at high performance has the potential to bring application processing that normally requires several resources in a data center to real-time edge applications. Possible examples are in-asset aircraft reconnaissance and satellite image processing. Furthermore, GSI’s expertise in developing radiation-tolerant components creates new opportunities in the growing market for AI products that can be used in low earth orbit and space applications, where other AI products are not able to survive the harsh environment. 6 Recent excitement relating to ChatGPT has brought the market for AI search to the forefront of consumer awareness. Applications using ChatGPT for natural language processing as well as similarity coding structures are situations where our APU has already shown benefits of higher speeds, higher accuracy and lower power consumption. Possible uses for ChatGPT are accelerating customer interest in technologies and services that can increase AI search capacity and significantly lower their utilization costs. For even smaller footprint applications such as satellites or networking blades, GSI is looking to license the intellectual property (“IP”) underlying the APU to companies that have their own chip design capabilities to incorporate GSI’s IP into their custom products. APU Board Level Product The APU is currently available as a full-size PCIe card, which is our LEDA-E product, and is used in enterprise, datacenter, and edge server installations. We are now productizing a 1U SSD-type E1.L form factor card, that is our LEDA-S board level product. The E1.L form factor enables the use of market standard SSD rack enclosures to build a dense APU compute appliance, such as a 16 card LEDA-S 1U form factor server. We envision that this dense appliance would be of high interest for in-plane real-time SAR applications, for instance. Software and systems are being developed to allow a single LEDA-S to be used without the need for a host PC so that, as an example, it can be packaged in a compact case for quad-copter use. These small appliances would allow functions such as location recognition, object recognition, and GPS-denied alternate routing useful for drone product delivery or reconnaissance applications. The APU board level products are also integrated and sold as server appliances that include software for turn-key applications in various markets such as medical molecular search and edge SAR image processing. APU SaaS Product We are also commercializing the APU as a service. This service offering runs on servers in a datacenter that have a direct connection to Amazon Web Services. Customers can access the APU via the AWS Cognito user identity and data synchronization service for GSI-packaged SaaS applications, or a customer’s own custom APU- accelerated applications. The cloud connected cards in this datacenter are also connected via the same ultra-low latency system to provide approximate nearest neighbor (“ANN”) and multi-modal extension capability to OpenSearch. We envision customers who use OpenSearch for their database storage would use our SaaS product to accelerate searches run on OpenSearch. Customers who are building their own search engines for special use case products could use our SaaS product to support high volume searches run on their products. There are early indications that our SaaS product can be used by vendors of SAR mapping and analysis services to enhance their own product offerings. APU Commercialization Risk Sales of APU products have not been material to date, and our commercialization efforts have taken much longer than anticipated. If we fail to commercialize our APU products, we may not generate sufficient revenues to offset our development costs and other expenses, which will have an adverse impact on our business including a potential impairment of intangible assets and a negative impact on our market capitalization. A n n u a l R e p o r t 7 High-Speed Synchronous SRAM Market Overview High-speed synchronous SRAMs are incorporated into networking and telecom equipment, military/defense and aerospace applications, audio/video processing, test and measurement equipment, medical and automotive applications, and other miscellaneous applications. The networking and telecom market demand for high-speed synchronous SRAMs has been, and is expected to continue to decline due to the industry trend of embedding greater amounts of SRAM into each generation of ASICs/controllers products, thereby reducing the need for external SRAMs. As a result, the demand for external high-speed synchronous SRAMs in new end-products is being driven by markets such as military/defense and aerospace applications. Such applications require a combination of high densities and high random transaction rates that GSI is well positioned to serve, being the only SRAM manufacturer to offer 288Mb densities as well as offering the highest truly random transaction rate in the industry – 1866 million transactions per second (MT/s). To further serve the military/defense and aerospace markets, GSI has been focusing on qualifying its products for space/satellite applications to capitalize on opportunities resulting from the development of near-earth orbiting satellite mega constellations, as well as the more traditional geo-stationary earth orbit satellite communication platforms and national assets. High-Speed Synchronous SRAM Products We offer four families of high-speed synchronous SRAMs – SyncBurst™, NBT™, SigmaQuad™, and SigmaDDR™. All four SRAM families feature high density, high transaction rate, high data bandwidth, low latency, and low power consumption. These four product families provide the basis for approximately 10,000 individual part numbers. They are available in several density and data width configurations, and are available in a variety of performance, feature, temperature, and package options. Our products can be found in a wide range of networking and telecommunications equipment, including routers, universal gateways, fast Ethernet switches and wireless base stations. We also sell our products to OEMs that manufacture products for military/defense and aerospace applications such as radar and guidance systems and satellites, for test and measurement applications such as high-speed testers, for automotive applications such as smart cruise control, and for medical applications such as ultrasound and CAT scan equipment. We have introduced and are marketing radiation-hardened, or “RadHard”, and radiation-tolerant, or “RadTolerant”, SRAMs for military/defense and aerospace applications such as networking satellites and missiles. Our initial RadHard and RadTolerant products are 288 megabit, 144 megabit, and 72 megabit devices from our SigmaQuad-II+ family. We have also expanded our product offerings to include 144 megabit, 72 megabit, and 32 megabit SyncBurst and NBT SRAMs RadTolerant products to enable the avionics and other space platforms that have historically leveraged smaller asynchronous devices. The RadHard products are housed in a hermetically- sealed ceramic column grid array package, and undergo a special fabrication process that diminishes the adverse effects of high-radiation environments. SRAM Leadership in the High Performance Memory Market We endeavor to address the overall needs of our SRAM customers, not only satisfying their immediate requirements for our latest generation, highest performance networking memory, but also providing them with the ongoing long-term support necessary during the entire lives of the systems in which our products are utilized. Accordingly, the key elements of our SRAM solution include: • Product Performance Leadership. Through the use of advanced architectures and design methodologies, we have developed high-performance SRAM products offering superior high speed performance capabilities and low power consumption, while our advanced silicon process technologies allow us to optimize yields, lower manufacturing costs and improve quality. 8 • Product Innovation. We believe that we have established a position as a technology leader in the design and development of Very Fast SRAMs. We are believed to have the industry’s highest density RadHard SRAM, the SigmaQuad - II+, which is an example of our industry-leading product innovation. • Broad and Readily Available Product Portfolio. We have what we believe is the broadest catalog of Very Fast SRAM products. • Master Die Methodology. Our master die methodology enables multiple product families, and variations thereof, to be manufactured from a single mask set so that we are able to maintain a common pool of wafers that incorporate all available master die, allowing rapid fulfillment of customer orders and reducing costs. • Customer Responsiveness. We work closely with leading networking and telecommunications OEMs, as well as their chip-set suppliers, to anticipate their requirements and to rapidly develop and implement solutions that allow them to meet their specific product performance objectives. Business Transformation Strategy Our objective is to market and sell transformative new products utilizing our cutting-edge in-place associative computing technology in high growth markets, while continuing to profitably increase our share of the external SRAM market. Our strategy includes the following key elements: • Complete productization of our initial In-place Associative Computing product. Our principal operations objective is the completion of productization efforts for our initial in-place associative computing product, including the second release of our compiler stack in the second half of calendar 2023. • • Identifying and developing new long tail markets where the APU is differentiated. Realization of this goal will require additional development and marketing efforts in calendar 2023. Our initial focus is in the markets for artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, including natural language processing, computer vision and cyber security with a focus in this area being for similarity search applications including facial recognition, drug discovery and drug toxicity, signal and object detection and cryptography. Identify opportunities and rapidly increase sales of RadHard and RadTolerant SRAMs. We continue to aggressively target the military/defense and aerospace markets with our RadHard and RadTolerant devices. We plan to continue expansion into the military/defense and aerospace markets with our APU platform that has shown design robustness. • Exploit opportunities to expand the market for our SRAM products. We are continuing the expansion of sales of our high-performance SRAM products in the military, industrial, test and measurement, and medical markets and intend to continue penetrating these and other new markets with similar needs for high-performance SRAM technologies. • Collaborate with wafer foundry to leverage advanced process technologies. We will continue to utilize complementary metal-oxide semiconductor fabrication process technologies from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (“TSMC”) to design our products. • Seek new market opportunities. We intend to supplement our internal development activities by seeking additional opportunities to acquire other businesses, product lines or technologies, or enter into strategic partnerships, that would complement our current product lines, expand the breadth of our markets, enhance our technical capabilities, or otherwise provide growth opportunities. A n n u a l R e p o r t 9 Customers For our compute-in-memory associative computing solutions, we are focusing sales and marketing efforts in the markets for artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, with leading applications in natural language processing, computer vision and synthetic aperture radar. Our focus in this area being for similarity search acceleration in fast vector search applications and real-time mobile applications in aerospace and defense. With the SRAM market, we are focusing our sales on network/telecom OEMs and military/defense and aerospace with our radiation hardened and radiation tolerant product offerings. The following is a representative list of our OEM customers that directly or indirectly purchased more than $600,000 of our SRAM products in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023: BAE Systems Lockheed Ciena Nokia Rockwell Honeywell Raytheon Many of our OEM customers use contract manufacturers to assemble their equipment. Accordingly, a significant percentage of our net revenues has been derived from sales to these contract manufacturers, and less frequently, to consignment warehouses who purchase products from us for use by contract manufacturers. In addition, we sell our products to OEM customers indirectly through domestic and international distributors. In the case of sales of our products to distributors and consignment warehouses, the decision to purchase our products is typically made by the OEM customers. In the case of contract manufacturers, OEM customers typically provide a list of approved products to the contract manufacturer, which then has discretion whether or not to purchase our products from that list. Direct sales to contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses accounted for 19.8%, 31.0% and 43.7% of our net revenues for fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Sales to foreign and domestic distributors accounted for 77.5%, 66.8% and 54.7% of our net revenues for fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of our net revenues in one or more of the following periods: Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2022 2021 2023 Contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses: Flextronics Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sanmina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.4 % 16.0 % 21.1 % 11.2 8.8 21.5 Distributors: Avnet Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nexcomm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48.1 16.6 38.0 17.2 29.8 14.7 Nokia was our largest customer in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021. Nokia purchases products directly from us and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Based on information provided to us by its contract manufacturers and our distributors, purchases by Nokia represented approximately 17%, 29% and 39% of our net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. To our knowledge, none of our other OEM customers accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues in any of these periods. 10 Sales, Marketing and Technical Support We sell our products primarily through our worldwide network of independent sales representatives and distributors. As of March 31, 2023, we employed 16 sales and marketing personnel, and were supported by over 200 independent sales representatives, which we believe will enable us to address an expanded customer base with the continuing introduction of our associative computing products in fiscal 2024. We believe that our relationship with our U.S. distributors, Avnet, Mouser and Digi-Key, put us in a strong position to address the Very Fast SRAM memory market in the United States. We currently have regional sales offices located in China, Hong Kong, Israel and the United States. We believe this international coverage allows us to better serve our distributors and OEM customers by providing them with coordinated support. We believe that our customers’ purchasing decisions are based primarily on product performance, low power consumption, availability, features, quality, reliability, price, manufacturing flexibility and service. Many of our OEM customers have had long-term relationships with us based on our success in meeting these criteria. Our sales are generally made pursuant to purchase orders received between one and twelve months prior to the scheduled delivery date. Because industry practice allows customers to reschedule or cancel orders on relatively short notice, these orders are not firm and hence we believe that backlog is not a good indicator of our future sales. We experienced increased costs as a result of supply chain constraints in fiscal 2022 and 2023 for wafers, including a 20% increase in the cost of wafers that was implemented in early calendar 2022 and a 6% increase that was implemented in early calendar 2023, as well as varying cost increases in outsourced assembly, burn-in and test operations. We have responded with increased pricing to our customers. We typically provide a warranty of up to 36 months on our products. Liability for a stated warranty period is usually limited to replacement of defective products. Our marketing efforts are, first and foremost, focused on ensuring that the products we develop meet or exceed our customers’ needs. Our marketing efforts are currently focused on marketing our in-place associative computing solutions and our radiation-tolerant and radiation-hardened space grade SRAMs. Previously, those efforts were focused on defining our high-performance SRAM product roadmap. We work closely with key customers to understand their roadmaps and to ensure that the products we develop meet their requirements (primary aspects of which include functionality, performance, electrical interfaces, power, and schedule). Our marketing group also provides technical, strategic and tactical sales support to our direct sales personnel, sales representatives and distributors. This support includes in-depth product presentations, datasheets, application notes, simulation models, sales tools, marketing communications, marketing research, trademark administration and other support functions. We also engage in various marketing activities to increase brand awareness. We emphasize customer service and technical support in an effort to provide our OEM customers with the knowledge and resources necessary to successfully use our products in their designs. Our customer service organization includes a technical team of applications engineers, technical marketing personnel and, when required, product design engineers. We provide customer support throughout the qualification and sales process and continue providing follow-up service after the sale of our products and on an ongoing basis. In addition, we provide our OEM customers with comprehensive datasheets, application notes and reference designs and access to our FPGA controller IP for use in their product development. Manufacturing We outsource our wafer fabrication, assembly and wafer sort testing, which enables us to focus on our design strengths, minimize fixed costs and capital expenditures and gain access to advanced manufacturing technologies. Our engineers work closely with our outsource partners to increase yields, reduce manufacturing costs, and help assure the quality of our products. 11 A n n u a l R e p o r t Currently, all of our SRAM and APU wafers are manufactured by TSMC under individually negotiated purchase orders. We do not currently have a long-term supply contract with our foundry, and, therefore, TSMC is not obligated to manufacture products for us for any specified period, in any specified quantity or at any specified price, except as may be provided in a particular purchase order. Our future success depends in part on our ability to secure sufficient capacity at TSMC or other independent foundries to supply us with the wafers we require. Our APU products are manufactured at TSMC using 28 nanometer process technology. The majority of our current SRAM products are manufactured using 0.13 micron, 90 nanometer, 65 nanometer and 40 nanometer process technologies on 300 millimeter wafers at TSMC. Our master die methodology enables multiple product families, and variations thereof, to be manufactured from a single mask set. As a result, based upon the way available die from a wafer are metalized, wire bonded, packaged and tested, we can create a number of different products. The manufacturing process consists of two phases, the first of which takes approximately thirteen to fifteen weeks and results in wafers that have the potential to yield multiple products within a given product family. After the completion of this phase, the wafers are stored pending customer orders. Once we receive orders for a particular product, we perform the second phase, consisting of final wafer processing, assembly, burn-in and test, which takes approximately eight to ten weeks to complete. Substrates are required in the second phase before the assembly process can begin for many of our products. This two-step manufacturing process enables us to significantly shorten our product lead times, providing flexibility for customization and to increase the availability of our products. All of our manufactured wafers, including wafers for our APU product, are tested for electrical compliance and most are packaged at Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (“ASE”) which is located in Taiwan. Wistron Neweb Corporation in Taiwan manufactures the boards for our APU product line. Our test procedures require that all of our products be subjected to accelerated burn-in and extensive functional electrical testing which is performed at our Taiwan and U.S. test facilities. Our radiation-hardened products are assembled and tested at Silicon Turnkey Solutions Inc., located near our Sunnyvale, California headquarters facility. Research and Development We have devoted substantial resources in the last seven years on the development of our APU products. Our research and development staff includes engineering professionals with extensive experience in the areas of high- speed circuit design, including APU design, as well as SRAM design and systems level networking and telecommunications equipment design. Additionally, we have assembled a team of software development experts in Israel needed for the development of the various levels of software required in the use of our APU products. The design process for our products is complex. As a result, we have made substantial investments in computer-aided design and engineering resources to manage our design process. Competition Our existing and potential competitors include many large domestic and international companies, some of which have substantially greater resources, offer other types of memory and/or non-memory technologies and may have longer standing relationships with OEM customers than we do. Unlike us, some of our principal competitors maintain their own semiconductor fabs, which may, at times, provide them with capacity, cost and technical advantages. Our principal competitors include NVIDIA Corporation and Intel Corporation for our in-place associative computing solutions and Infineon Technologies AG, Integrated Silicon Solution and REC for our SRAM products. We expect additional competitors to enter the associative computing market as well. While some of our competitors 12 offer a broader array of products and offer some of their products at lower prices than we do, we believe that our focus on performance leadership provides us with key competitive advantages. In December 2021, we were among the leaders in the Billion-Scale Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search Challenge held at the NeurIPS 2021 Conference performing on par with NVIDIA and Intel. Our results in the ANNS Challenge proved that our technology could perform on par with the category leaders in AI. The Billion-Scale ANNS Challenge was created to provide a comparative understanding of algorithmic ideas and their application at scale, promote the development of new techniques for the problem and demonstrate their value, and introduce a standard benchmarking approach. In April 2022, we announced that our submission to the MoSAIC Challenge won first place in the Human/Object Tagging category. The MoSAIC Challenge was designed to identify best-in-class, cutting-edge hardware and software solutions to address challenging and longstanding technological gaps concerning remote autonomous indoor maneuvers. The MoSAIC Challenge was led by the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”), Irregular Warfare Technical Support Directorate (“IWTSD”), and the Israel Ministry of Defense (“IMOD”), Directorate of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&D), along with the Merage Institute. We believe that our ability to compete successfully in the rapidly evolving markets for “big data” and memory products for the networking and telecommunications markets depends on a number of factors, including: • product performance, features, including low power consumption, quality, reliability and price; • manufacturing flexibility, product availability and customer service throughout the lifetime of the product; • • • the availability of software tools, such as compilers and libraries that enable customers to easily design products for their specific needs; the timing and success of new product introductions by us, our customers and our competitors; and our ability to anticipate and conform to new industry standards. We believe we compete favorably with our competitors based on these factors. However, we may not be able to compete successfully in the future with respect to any of these factors. Our failure to compete successfully in these or other areas could harm our business. The market for networking memory products is competitive and is characterized by technological change, declining average selling prices and product obsolescence. Competition could increase in the future from existing competitors and from other companies that may enter our existing or future markets with solutions that may be less costly or provide higher performance or more desirable features than our products. This increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share. In addition, we are vulnerable to advances in technology by competitors, including new SRAM architectures as well as new forms of Dynamic Random Access Memory (“DRAM”) and other new memory technologies. Because we have limited experience developing integrated circuit (“IC”) products other than Very Fast SRAMs, any efforts by us to introduce new products based on new technology, including our new in-place associative computing products, may not be successful and, as a result, our business may suffer. A n n u a l R e p o r t 13 Intellectual Property Our ability to compete successfully depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology and information. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret laws, non-disclosure and other contractual arrangements and technical measures to protect our intellectual property. We believe that it is important to maintain a large patent portfolio to protect our innovations. We currently hold 123 United States patents, including 63 memory patents and 60 associative computing patents, and have in excess of a dozen patent applications pending. We cannot assure you that any patents will be issued as a result of our pending applications. We believe that factors such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel and the success of our ongoing product development efforts are also important in maintaining our competitive position. We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, distributors, customers and potential customers and limit access to our proprietary information. Our intellectual property rights, if challenged, may not be upheld as valid, may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology or may not prevent the development of competitive products. Additionally, we may not be able to obtain patents or other intellectual property protection in the future. Furthermore, the laws of certain foreign countries in which our products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold, including various countries in Asia, may not protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States and thus make the possibility of piracy of our technology and products more likely in these countries. The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights, which have resulted in significant and often protracted and expensive litigation. We or our foundry from time to time are notified of claims that we may be infringing patents or other intellectual property rights owned by third parties. We have been involved in patent infringement litigation in the past. We have been subject to other intellectual property claims in the past and we may be subject to additional claims and litigation in the future. Litigation by or against us relating to allegations of patent infringement or other intellectual property matters could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, whether or not such litigation results in a determination favorable to us. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, discontinue the use of certain processes or obtain licenses to the infringing technology. Licenses may not be offered or the terms of any offered licenses may not be acceptable to us. If we fail to obtain a license from a third party for technology used by us, we could incur substantial liabilities and be required to suspend the manufacture of products or the use by our foundry of certain processes. Human Capital Resources In November 2022, we announced measures taken to reduce our operating expenses by approximately $7.0 million on an annualized basis, primarily from salary reductions related to reduced headcount and salary decreases for certain retained employees, as well as targeted reductions in research and development spending. These strategic cost reduction measures are expected to enable us to better focus on our operational resources on advancing our proprietary APU technology. None of our Gemini-II chip development and core APU software development efforts, including the building of the APU compiler, was affected by the reduction in research and development spending. The APU marketing, sales, and APU engineering efforts will retain priority in our budget. The spending reductions are not expected to impact the launch of Gemini-I in target markets, including SAR, search, and SaaS. The cost reduction initiative is expected to be completed by September 30, 2023 and will result in an approximate 15% decrease in our global workforce. In total, we expect to incur approximately $917,000 in cash expenditures for termination costs, including the payout of accrued vacation, of which $490,000 was incurred in fiscal 2023. 14 As of March 31, 2023, we had 156 full-time employees, including 107 engineers, of which 70 are engaged in research and development and 48 have PhD or MS degrees, 16 employees in sales and marketing, 10 employees in general and administrative capacities and 60 employees in manufacturing. Of these employees, 51 are based in our Sunnyvale facility, 55 are based in our Taiwan facility and 35 are based in our Israel facility. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly-skilled, engineering, managerial, sales and marketing personnel. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our employee relations are good. Compensation and benefits Our goal is to attract, motivate and retain talent with a focus on encouraging performance, promoting accountability and adhering to our company values. The future growth and success of our company largely depends on our ability to attract, train and retain qualified professionals. As part of our effort to do so, we offer competitive compensation and benefit programs including a 401(k) Plan, stock options for all employees, flexible spending accounts and paid time off. We understand that effective compensation and benefits programs are important in retaining high-performing and qualified individuals. We continue to assess our healthcare and retirement benefits each year in order to provide competitive benefits to our employees. Diversity, inclusion and belonging We are committed to our continued efforts to increase diversity and foster an inclusive work environment that supports the global workforce and the communities we serve. We recruit the best people for the job regardless of gender, ethnicity or other protected traits and it is our policy to fully comply with all laws applicable to discrimination in the workplace. Our diversity, equity and inclusion principles are also reflected in our employee training and policies. We continue to enhance our diversity, equity and inclusion policies which are guided by our executive leadership team. Ethics & Corporate Responsibility We are committed to ensuring ethical organizational governance, embracing diversity and inclusion in the board room and throughout the organization and are committed to observing fair, transparent, and accountable operating practices. We seek to create and foster a healthy, balanced, and ethical work environment for everyone in our organization. To this end, we promote an ethical organizational culture and encourage all employees to raise questions or concerns about actual or potential ethical issues and company policies and to offer suggestions about how we can make our organization better. These practices are set forth in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is periodically reviewed by all of our employees and is available on our website under “Corporate Governance.” Health and safety We are committed to maintain a safe and healthy workplace for our employees. Our policies and practices are intended to protect our employees. Since fiscal 2021, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented safety protocols and new procedures to protect our employees. These protocols, which were no longer being enforced, included complying with social distancing and other health and safety standards as required by state and local government agencies, taking into consideration guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other public health authorities. A n n u a l R e p o r t 15 Investor Information You can access financial and other information in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.gsitechnology.com. We make available, on our website, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC. The charters of our Audit Committee, our Compensation Committee, and our Nominating and Governance Committee, our code of conduct (including code of ethics provisions that apply to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, and senior financial officers) and our corporate governance guidelines are also available at our website under “Corporate Governance.” These items are also available to any stockholder who requests them by calling (408) 331-8800. The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference in this report. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information About Our Executive Officers The following table sets forth certain information concerning our executive officers as of June 1, 2023: Name Lee-Lean Shu . . . . . . . . . . . Avidan Akerib . . . . . . . . . . Didier Lasserre . . . . . . . . . . Douglas Schirle . . . . . . . . . Bor-Tay Wu . . . . . . . . . . . . Ping Wu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert Yau . . . . . . . . . . . . . Age 68 67 58 68 71 66 70 Title President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Vice President, Associative Computing Vice President, Sales Chief Financial Officer Vice President, Taiwan Operations Vice President, U.S. Operations Vice President, Engineering, Secretary and Director Lee-Lean Shu co-founded our company in March 1995 and has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors since inception. Since October 2000, Mr. Shu has also served as Chairman of our Board. From January 1995 to March 1995, Mr. Shu was Director, SRAM Design at Sony Microelectronics Corporation, a semiconductor company and a subsidiary of Sony Corporation, and from July 1990 to January 1995, he was a design manager at Sony Microelectronics Corporation. Avidan Akerib has served as our Vice President, Associative Computing since MikaMonu Group Ltd. was acquired in November 2015. From July 2011 to November 2015, Dr. Akerib served as co-founder and chief technologist of MikaMonu Group Ltd, a developer of computer in-memory and storage technologies. From July 2008 to March 2011, Dr. Akerib served as chief scientist of ZikBit Ltd., a developer of DRAM computing technologies. From Jan 2001 to July 2007, Dr. Akerib was the General Manager of NeoMagic Israel, a supplier of low-power audio and video integrated circuits for mobile use. Dr. Akerib has a PhD in applied mathematics and computer science from the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel, and an MSc and BSc in electrical engineering from Tel Aviv University and Ben Gurion University, respectively. Dr. Akerib is the inventor of more than 50 patents related to parallel and In Memory Associative Computing. Didier Lasserre has served as our Vice President, Sales since July 2002. From November 1997 to July 2002, Mr. Lasserre served as our Director of Sales for the Western United States and Europe. From July 1996 to 16 October 1997, Mr. Lasserre was an account manager at Solectron Corporation, a provider of electronics manufacturing services. From June 1988 to July 1996, Mr. Lasserre was a field sales engineer at Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, a semiconductor company. Douglas Schirle has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2000. From June 1999 to August 2000, Mr. Schirle served as our Corporate Controller. From March 1997 to June 1999, Mr. Schirle was the Corporate Controller at Pericom Semiconductor Corporation, a provider of digital and mixed signal integrated circuits. From November 1996 to February 1997, Mr. Schirle was Vice President, Finance for Paradigm Technology, a manufacturer of SRAMs, and from December 1993 to October 1996, he was the Controller for Paradigm Technology. Mr. Schirle was formerly a certified public accountant. Bor-Tay Wu has served as our Vice President, Taiwan Operations since January 1997. From January 1995 to December 1996, Mr. Wu was a design manager at Atalent, an IC design company in Taiwan. Ping Wu has served as our Vice President, U.S. Operations since September 2006. He served in the same capacity from February 2004 to April 2006. From April 2006 to August 2006, Mr. Wu was Vice President of Operations at QPixel Technology, a semiconductor company. From July 1999 to January 2004, Mr. Wu served as our Director of Operations. From July 1997 to June 1999, Mr. Wu served as Vice President of Operations at Scan Vision, a semiconductor manufacturer. Robert Yau co-founded our company in March 1995 and has served as our Vice President, Engineering and as a member of our Board of Directors since inception. From December 1993 to February 1995, Mr. Yau was design manager for specialty memory devices at Sony Microelectronics Corporation. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Yau was design manager at MOSEL/VITELIC, a semiconductor company. Item 1A. Risk Factors Our future performance is subject to a variety of risks. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer and the trading price of our common stock could decline. Additional risks that we currently do not know about or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. You should also refer to other information contained in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Risk Factor Summary Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, which are more fully described in the Risk Factors below. These risks include, but are not limited to: Risks Related to Our Business and Financial Condition • Unpredictable fluctuations in our operating results could cause our stock price to decline. • Our largest OEM customer accounts for a significant percentage of our net revenues. If this customer, or any of our other major customers, reduces the amount they purchase, stops purchasing our products or fails to pay us, our financial position and operating results will suffer. • Rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, bank failures, the military conflict in Ukraine, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment may continue to adversely affect our financial condition. • We have incurred significant losses and may incur losses in the future. A n n u a l R e p o r t 17 • We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and if our remediation of such material weakness is not effective, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements could be impaired. • Goodwill impairment and related charges, as well as other accounting charges or adjustments could negatively impact our operating results. • We depend upon the sale of our Very Fast SRAMs for most of our revenues and the market for Very Fast SRAMs is highly competitive. • If we do not successfully implement certain cost reduction initiatives, we may suffer adverse impacts on our business and operations. • We are dependent on a number of single source suppliers. • • If we do not successfully develop and introduce the new in-place associative computing products, which entails certain significant risks, our business will be harmed. If we are unable to offset increased wafer fabrication and assembly costs, our gross margins will suffer. • We are subject to the highly cyclical nature of the networking and telecommunications markets. • We rely heavily on distributors and our business will be negatively impacted if we are unable to develop and manage distribution channels and accurately forecast future sales through our distributors. • The average selling prices of our products are expected to decline. • We are substantially dependent on the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel. If we are unable to recruit or retain qualified personnel, our business could be harmed. • Cyber-attacks could disrupt our operations or the operations of our partners, and result in reduced revenue, increased costs, liability claims and harm our reputation or competitive position. • Demand for our products may decrease if our OEM customers experience difficulty manufacturing, marketing or selling their products. • Our products have lengthy sales cycles that make it difficult to plan our expenses and forecast results. • Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist stockholders or others. • Our acquisition of companies or technologies could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results. • Our business will suffer if we are unable to protect our intellectual property or if there are claims that we infringe third party intellectual property rights. • Current unfavorable economic and market conditions may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. • If our business grows, such growth may place a significant strain on our management and operations. Risks Related to Manufacturing and Product Development • We may experience difficulties in transitioning our manufacturing process technologies, which may result in reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product deliveries and increased expenses. • Manufacturing process technologies are subject to rapid change and require significant expenditures. • Our products may contain defects, which could reduce revenues or result in claims against us. 18 Risks Related to Our International Business and Operations • The international political, social and economic environment, particularly as it relates to Taiwan, may affect our business performance. • Certain of our independent suppliers and OEM customers have operations in the Pacific Rim, an area subject to significant risk of natural disasters and outbreak of contagious diseases such as COVID-19. • The United States could materially modify certain international trade agreements, or change tax provisions related to the global manufacturing and sales of our products. • Some of our products are incorporated into advanced military electronics, and changes in international geopolitical circumstances and domestic budget considerations may hurt our business. Risks Relating to Our Common Stock and the Securities Market • The trading price of our common stock is subject to fluctuation and is likely to be volatile. • We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all, and which may cause dilution to existing stockholders. • Use of a portion of our cash reserves to repurchase shares of our common stock presents potential risks and disadvantages to us and our continuing stockholders. • Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates hold a substantial percentage of our common stock. • The provisions of our charter documents might inhibit potential acquisition bids that a stockholder might believe are desirable, and the market price of our common stock could be lower as a result. Risks Related to Our Business and Financial Condition Unpredictable fluctuations in our operating results could cause our stock price to decline. Our quarterly and annual revenues, expenses and operating results have varied significantly and are likely to vary in the future. For example, in the twelve fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2023, we recorded net revenues of as much as $9.0 million and as little as $5.4 million, and operating losses from $2.9 million to $5.7 million. We therefore believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not a good indication of our future performance, and you should not rely on them to predict our future performance or the future performance of our stock price. Furthermore, if our operating expenses exceed our expectations, our financial performance could be adversely affected. Factors that may affect periodic operating results in the future include: • • • • • • • commercial acceptance of our associative computing products; commercial acceptance of our RadHard and RadTolerant products; changes in our customers' inventory management practices; unpredictability of the timing and size of customer orders, since most of our customers purchase our products on a purchase order basis rather than pursuant to a long-term contract; changes in our product pricing policies, including those made in response to new product announcements, pricing changes of our competitors and price increases by our foundry and suppliers; our ability to anticipate and conform to new industry standards; fluctuations in availability and costs associated with materials and manufacturing services needed to satisfy customer requirements caused by supply constraints; A n n u a l R e p o r t 19 • restructuring, asset and goodwill impairment and related charges, as well as other accounting changes or adjustments; • manufacturing defects, which could cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair costs, lose potential sales, harm our relationships with customers and result in write-downs; and • our ability to address technology issues as they arise, improve our products' functionality and expand our product offerings. Our expenses are, to a large extent, fixed, and we expect that these expenses will increase in the future. In fiscal years 2022 and 2023, we experienced price increases for raw materials, including a 20% increase in the price of wafers that was implemented in early calendar 2022 and a 6% increase that was implemented in early calendar 2023, as well as varying pricing increases for manufacturing services due to the supply chain constraints in the semiconductor market. We expect to experience additional price increases for raw materials in fiscal year 2024 due to worldwide inflationary pressures. We will not be able to adjust our spending quickly if our revenues fall short of our expectations. If this were to occur, our operating results would be harmed. If our operating results in future quarters fall below the expectations of market analysts and investors, the price of our common stock could fall. Rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, bank failures, the military conflict in Ukraine, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment have caused increased stock market volatility and uncertainty in customer demand and the worldwide economy in general, and we may continue to experience decreased sales and revenues in the future. We expect such impact will in particular affect our SRAM sales and has also impacted the launch of our APU product to some degree and the adoption of RadHard and RadTolerant SRAM products by aerospace and military customers. However, the magnitude of such impact on our business and its duration is highly uncertain. Our largest OEM customer accounts for a significant percentage of our net revenues. If this customer, or any of our other major customers, reduces the amount they purchase or stop purchasing our products, our operating results will suffer. Nokia, our largest customer, purchases our products directly from us and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Purchases by Nokia represented approximately 17%, 29% and 39% of our net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We expect that our operating results in any given period will continue to depend significantly on orders from our key OEM customers, particularly Nokia, and our future success is dependent to a large degree on the business success of this customer over which we have no control. We do not have long-term contracts with Nokia or any of our other major OEM customers, distributors or contract manufacturers that obligate them to purchase our products. We expect that future direct and indirect sales to Nokia and our other key OEM customers will continue to fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis and that such fluctuations may substantially affect our operating results in future periods. If we fail to continue to sell to our key OEM customers, distributors or contract manufacturers in sufficient quantities, our business could be harmed. Rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, bank failures, the military conflict in Ukraine, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the resulting decline in the global economic environment are expected to adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. Our business is expected to be materially adversely affected by rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, bank failures, the military conflict in Ukraine and the significant fluctuations in energy prices, all of which are contributing to a decline in the global economic environment. Our quarterly revenues have been flat and trended downward in the past year due to the decline in the global economic environment that has resulted in less demand for GSI’s products. We expect that a continued rise in interest rates, continued inflationary pressures, recent bank failures, continued uncertainties in the business climate 20 caused by the military conflict in Ukraine and related fluctuations in energy prices will adversely impact demand for new and existing products, and to impact the mindset of potential commercial partners to launch new products using GSI’s technology. The resulting decline in the global economic environment is expected to have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition. Disruptions in the capital and financial markets as a result of rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, bank failures, the military conflict in Ukraine, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment may also adversely affect our ability to obtain additional liquidity should the impacts of a decline in the global economic environment continue for a prolonged period. We have incurred significant losses and may incur losses in the future. We have incurred significant losses. We incurred net losses of $16.0 million, $16.4 million and $21.5 million during fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. There can be no assurance that our Very Fast SRAMs will continue to receive broad market acceptance, that our new product development initiatives will be successful or that we will be able to achieve sustained revenue growth or profitability. We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and if our remediation of such material weakness is not effective, or if we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable laws and regulations could be impaired. In the course of preparing our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which remained un-remediated at March 31, 2023. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness identified pertains to the design and maintenance of control over the review of the forecasts used to calculate the contingent consideration liability, used in the goodwill impairment test and used in the recoverability test for intangible assets. This material weakness has not been remediated as of March 31, 2023. Our management is taking steps to remediate our material weakness, including re-evaluating the methodology and procedures involved in developing forecasts as well as the review and oversight of the forecasting process. We are in the process of implementing a detailed plan for the remediation of the material weakness, including enhancing management’s review controls over the forecasts used to calculate the contingent consideration liability, used in the recoverability test for intangible assets and used in the goodwill impairment test. Although we have begun implementing the enhancements described above, the material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. Until this material weakness is remediated, we plan to continue to perform additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. If we are unable to further implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, our ability to record, process and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within required time periods could be adversely affected, which could subject us to litigation or investigations requiring management resources and payment of legal and other expenses, negatively affect investor confidence in our financial statements and adversely impact our stock price. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected and we could become subject to litigation or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources. A n n u a l R e p o r t 21 Furthermore, we cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, and actions we may take in the future, will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies that led to our material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting or that they will prevent or avoid potential future material weaknesses. Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. Further, weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations. If we determine that our goodwill and intangible assets have become impaired, we may incur impairment charges, which would negatively impact our operating results. Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, such as our acquisition of MikaMonu Group Ltd. in fiscal 2016. We test for goodwill impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset is more likely than not impaired. If the carrying value of a material asset is determined to be impaired, it will be written down to fair value by a charge to operating earnings. As of March 31, 2023, we had a goodwill balance of $8.0 million and intangible assets of $1.8 million, respectively, from the MikaMonu acquisition. An adverse change in market conditions, including a sustained decline in our stock price, loss of significant customers, or a weakened demand for our products could be considered to be an impairment triggering event. If such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates, a change to the estimation of fair value could result in an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets, which would negatively impact our operating results and harm our business. In the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, we identified sustained declines in our stock price that resulted in our market capitalization being below the carrying value of our stockholders’ equity. We concluded the sustained declines in our stock price were triggering events and proceeded with quantitative goodwill impairment assessments. The results of the quantitative goodwill impairment assessments that we performed indicated the fair value of our sole reporting unit exceeded its carrying value as of December 31, 2022, February 28, 2023 and March 31, 2023. We depend upon the sale of our Very Fast SRAMs for most of our revenues, and a downturn in demand for these products could significantly reduce our revenues and harm our business. We derive most of our revenues from the sale of Very Fast SRAMs, and we expect that sales of these products will represent the substantial majority of our revenues for the foreseeable future. Our business depends in large part upon continued demand for our products in the markets we currently serve, which will continue to be adversely impacted by the decline in the global economic environment, and adoption of our products in new markets. Market adoption will be dependent upon our ability to increase customer awareness of the benefits of our products and to prove their high-performance and cost-effectiveness. We may not be able to sustain or increase our revenues from sales of our products, particularly if the networking and telecommunications markets were to experience another significant downturn in the future. Any decrease in revenues from sales of our products could harm our business more than it would if we offered a more diversified line of products. Our future success is substantially dependent on the successful introduction of new in-place associative computing products which entails significant risks. Since 2015, our principal strategic objective has been the development of our first in-place associative computing product. We have devoted, and will continue to devote, substantial efforts and resources to the development of our new family of in-place associative computing products. This ongoing project involves the commercialization of new, cutting-edge technology, will require a continuing substantial effort during fiscal 2024 22 and will be subject to significant risks. In addition to the typical risks associated with the development of technologically advanced products, this project will be subject to enhanced risks of technological problems related to the development of this entirely new category of products, substantial risks of delays or unanticipated costs that may be encountered, and risks associated with the establishment of entirely new markets and customer and partner relationships. The establishment of new customer and partner relationships and selling our in-place associative computing products to such new customers is a significant undertaking that requires us to invest heavily in our sales team, enter into new channel partner relationships, expand our marketing activities and change the focus of our business and operations. Our inability to successfully establish a market for the product that we have developed will have a material adverse effect on our future financial and business success, including our prospects for increased revenues. Additionally, if we are unable to meet the expectations of market analysts and investors with respect to this major product introduction effort, then the price of our common stock could fall. We are dependent on a number of single source suppliers, and if we fail to obtain adequate supplies, our business will be harmed and our prospects for growth will be curtailed. We currently purchase several key components used in the manufacture of our products from single sources and are dependent upon supply from these sources to meet our needs. If any of these suppliers cannot provide components on a timely basis, at the same price or at all, our ability to manufacture our products will be constrained and our business will suffer. For example, due to worldwide inflationary pressures, the cost of wafers and assembly services have increased by approximately 25% since the beginning of fiscal 2021. Most significantly, we obtain wafers for our Very Fast SRAM and APU products from a single foundry, TSMC, and most of them are packaged at ASE. If we are unable to obtain an adequate supply of wafers from TSMC or find alternative sources in a timely manner, we will be unable to fulfill our customer orders and our operating results will be harmed. We do not have supply agreements with TSMC, ASE or any of our other independent assembly and test suppliers, and instead obtain manufacturing services and products from these suppliers on a purchase-order basis. Our suppliers, including TSMC, have no obligation to supply products or services to us for any specific product, in any specific quantity, at any specific price or for any specific time period. As a result, the loss or failure to perform by any of these suppliers could adversely affect our business and operating results. Should any of our single source suppliers experience manufacturing failures or yield shortfalls, be disrupted by natural disaster, military action or political instability, choose to prioritize capacity or inventory for other uses or reduce or eliminate deliveries to us for any other reason, we likely will not be able to enforce fulfillment of any delivery commitments and we would have to identify and qualify acceptable replacements from alternative sources of supply. In particular, if TSMC is unable to supply us with sufficient quantities of wafers to meet all of our requirements, we would have to allocate our products among our customers, which would constrain our growth and might cause some of them to seek alternative sources of supply. Since the manufacturing of wafers and other components is extremely complex, the process of qualifying new foundries and suppliers is a lengthy process and there is no assurance that we would be able to find and qualify another supplier without materially adversely affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we do not successfully develop new products to respond to rapid market changes due to changing technology and evolving industry standards, particularly in the networking and telecommunications markets, our business will be harmed. If we fail to offer technologically advanced products and respond to technological advances and emerging standards, we may not generate sufficient revenues to offset our development costs and other expenses, which will hurt our business. The development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process that requires the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. In particular, the networking and telecommunications markets are rapidly evolving and new standards are emerging. We are vulnerable to advances in technology by competitors, including new SRAM architectures, new forms of DRAM and the emergence of new memory 23 A n n u a l R e p o r t technologies that could enable the development of products that feature higher performance or lower cost. In addition, the trend toward incorporating SRAM into other chips in the networking and telecommunications markets has the potential to reduce future demand for Very Fast SRAM products. We may experience development, marketing and other technological difficulties that may delay or limit our ability to respond to technological changes, evolving industry standards, competitive developments or end-user requirements. For example, because we have limited experience developing integrated circuits, or IC, products other than Very Fast SRAMs, our efforts to introduce new products may not be successful and our business may suffer. Other challenges that we face include: • our products may become obsolete upon the introduction of alternative technologies; • we may incur substantial costs if we need to modify our products to respond to these alternative technologies; • we may not have sufficient resources to develop or acquire new technologies or to introduce new products capable of competing with future technologies; • new products that we develop may not successfully integrate with our end-users’ products into which they are incorporated; • we may be unable to develop new products that incorporate emerging industry standards; • we may be unable to develop or acquire the rights to use the intellectual property necessary to implement new technologies; and • when introducing new or enhanced products, we may be unable to effectively manage the transition from older products. If we do not successfully implement the cost reduction initiatives that were announced on November 30, 2022, we may suffer adverse impacts on our business and operations. On November 30, 2022, we announced the implementation of cost reduction initiatives. The cost reduction initiatives are expected to be completed by September 30, 2023, and will result in an approximate 15% decrease in our global workforce. The aim of these initiatives is to reduce GSI Technology’s operating expenses by approximately $7.0 million on an annualized basis, primarily from salary reductions related to reduced headcount and salary decreases for certain retained employees, as well as targeted reductions in research and development spending. The implementation of these cost reduction initiatives may result in unintended and adverse impacts on our business and operations. Any failure to successfully implement the cost reduction initiatives could prevent us from focusing our operational resources on advancing GSI Technology’s proprietary APU technology. If we are unable to offset increased wafer fabrication and assembly costs by increasing the average selling prices of our products, our gross margins will suffer. If there is a significant upturn in the demand for the manufacturing and assembly of semiconductor products as occurred in fiscal 2022, the available supply of wafers and packaging services may be limited. As a result, we could be required to obtain additional manufacturing and assembly capacity in order to meet increased demand. Securing additional manufacturing and assembly capacity may cause our wafer fabrication and assembly costs to increase. Inflationary pressures may also cause our wafer fabrication costs to increase. If we are unable to offset these increased costs by increasing the average selling prices of our products, our gross margins will decline. 24 We are subject to the highly cyclical nature of the networking and telecommunications markets. Our Very Fast SRAM products are incorporated into routers, switches, wireless local area network infrastructure equipment, wireless base stations and network access equipment used in the highly cyclical networking and telecommunications markets. We expect that the networking and telecommunications markets will continue to be highly cyclical, characterized by periods of rapid growth and contraction. Our business and our operating results are likely to fluctuate, perhaps quite severely, as a result of this cyclicality. The market for Very Fast SRAMs is highly competitive. The market for Very Fast SRAMs, which are used primarily in networking and telecommunications equipment, is characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, cyclical market patterns and intense foreign and domestic competition. Several of our competitors offer a broad array of memory products and have greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution and other resources than we have. Some of our competitors maintain their own semiconductor fabrication facilities, which may provide them with capacity, cost and technical advantages over us. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against any of these competitors. Our ability to compete successfully in this market depends on factors both within and outside of our control, including: • • • • • • real or perceived imbalances in supply and demand of Very Fast SRAMs; the rate at which OEMs incorporate our products into their systems; the success of our customers’ products; the price of our competitors’ products relative to the price of our products; our ability to develop and market new products; and the supply and cost of wafers. In fiscal 2022 and 2023 we experienced increases of 20% and 6%, respectively, in wafer fabrication costs due to supply chain constraints, which resulted in us increasing the cost of our products. Inflationary pressures are expected to result in additional increases in our wafer fabrication costs, which may require us to further increase the cost of our products. Our customers may decide to purchase products from our competitors rather than accept these price increases and our business may suffer. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the future. Our failure to compete successfully in these or other areas could harm our business. We rely heavily on distributors and our success depends on our ability to develop and manage our indirect distribution channels. A significant percentage of our sales are made to distributors and to contract manufacturers who incorporate our products into end products for OEMs. For example, in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, our largest distributor Avnet Logistics accounted for 48.1%, 38.0% and 29.8%, respectively, of our net revenues. Avnet Logistics and our other existing distributors may choose to devote greater resources to marketing and supporting the products of other companies. Since we sell through multiple channels and distribution networks, we may have to resolve potential conflicts between these channels. For example, these conflicts may result from the different discount levels offered by multiple channel distributors to their customers or, potentially, from our direct sales force targeting the same equipment manufacturer accounts as our indirect channel distributors. These conflicts may harm our business or reputation. A n n u a l R e p o r t 25 The average selling prices of our products are expected to decline, and if we are unable to offset these declines, our operating results will suffer. Historically, the average unit selling prices of our products have declined substantially over the lives of the products, and we expect this trend to continue. A reduction in overall average selling prices of our products could result in reduced revenues and lower gross margins. Our ability to increase our net revenues and maintain our gross margins despite a decline in the average selling prices of our products will depend on a variety of factors, including our ability to introduce lower cost versions of our existing products, increase unit sales volumes of these products, and introduce new products with higher prices and greater margins. If we fail to accomplish any of these objectives, our business will suffer. To reduce our costs, we may be required to implement design changes that lower our manufacturing costs, negotiate reduced purchase prices from our independent foundries and our independent assembly and test vendors, and successfully manage our manufacturing and subcontractor relationships. Because we do not operate our own wafer foundry or assembly facilities, we may not be able to reduce our costs as rapidly as companies that operate their own foundries or facilities. We are substantially dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and other key personnel. Our future success is substantially dependent on the continued services and continuing contributions of our senior management who must work together effectively in order to design our products, expand our business, increase our revenues and improve our operating results. Members of our senior management team have long- standing and important relationships with our key customers and suppliers. The loss of services, whether as a result of illness, resignation, retirement or death, of Lee-Lean Shu, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Avidan Akerib, our Vice President of Associative Computing, any other executive officer or other key employee could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our development and strategic objectives. We do not have employment contracts with, nor maintain key person insurance on, any of our executive officers or other key employees. System security risks, data protection, cyber-attacks and systems integration issues could disrupt our internal operations or the operations of our business partners, and any such disruption could harm our reputation or cause a reduction in our expected revenue, increase our expenses, negatively impact our results of operation or otherwise adversely affect our stock price. Security breaches, computer malware and cyber-attacks have become more prevalent and sophisticated and may increase in the future due to a number of our employees working from home and the potential for retaliatory cyber-attacks as a result of the military conflict in Ukraine. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security or the network security of our business partners, and misappropriate or compromise our confidential and proprietary information, create system disruptions or cause shutdowns. The costs to us to eliminate or alleviate cyber or other security problems, bugs, viruses, worms, malicious software programs and security vulnerabilities could be significant, and our efforts to address these problems may not be successful and could result in interruptions and delays that may impede our sales, manufacturing, distribution or other critical functions. We manage and store various proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data relating to our business on the cloud. Breaches of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure or unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or confidential data about us, including the potential loss or disclosure of such information or data as a result of fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our reputation or otherwise harm our business. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of implementing further data protection measures could be significant. 26 Portions of our IT infrastructure also may experience interruptions, delays or cessations of service or produce errors in connection with systems integration or migration work that takes place from time to time. We may not be successful in implementing new systems and transitioning data, which could cause business disruptions and be more expensive, time consuming, disruptive and resource-intensive than originally anticipated. Such disruptions could adversely impact our ability to attract and retain customers, fulfill orders and interrupt other processes and could adversely affect our business, financial results, stock price and reputation. We may be unable to accurately forecast future sales through our distributors, which could harm our ability to efficiently manage our resources to match market demand. Our financial results, quarterly product sales, trends and comparisons are affected by fluctuations in the buying patterns of the OEMs that purchase our products from our distributors. While we attempt to assist our distributors in maintaining targeted stocking levels of our products, we may not consistently be accurate or successful. This process involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties, including end user demand. Inventory levels of our products held by our distributors may exceed or fall below the levels we consider desirable on a going-forward basis. This could result in distributors returning unsold inventory to us, or in us not having sufficient inventory to meet the demand for our products. If we are not able to accurately forecast sales through our distributors or effectively manage our relationships with our distributors, our business and financial results will suffer. A small number of customers generally account for a significant portion of our accounts receivable in any period, and if any one of them fails to pay us, our financial position and operating results will suffer. At March 31, 2023, three customers accounted for 36%, 25% and 19% of our accounts receivable, respectively. If any of these customers do not pay us, our financial position and operating results will be harmed. Generally, we do not require collateral from our customers. Demand for our products may decrease if our OEM customers experience difficulty manufacturing, marketing or selling their products. Our products are used as components in our OEM customers’ products, including routers, switches and other networking and telecommunications products. Accordingly, demand for our products is subject to factors affecting the ability of our OEM customers to successfully introduce and market their products, including: • • • • • capital spending by telecommunication and network service providers and other end-users who purchase our OEM customers’ products; the competition our OEM customers face, particularly in the networking and telecommunications industries; the technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing and management capabilities of our OEM customers; the financial and other resources of our OEM customers; and the inability of our OEM customers to sell their products if they infringe third-party intellectual property rights. As a result, if OEM customers reduce their purchases of our products, our business will suffer. A n n u a l R e p o r t 27 Our products have lengthy sales cycles that make it difficult to plan our expenses and forecast results. Our products are generally incorporated in our OEM customers’ products at the design stage. However, their decisions to use our products often require significant expenditures by us without any assurance of success, and often precede volume sales, if any, by a year or more. If an OEM customer decides at the design stage not to incorporate our products into their products, we will not have another opportunity for a design win with respect to that customer’s product for many months or years, if at all. Our sales cycle can take up to 24 months to complete, and because of this lengthy sales cycle, we may experience a delay between increasing expenses for research and development and our sales and marketing efforts and the generation of volume production revenues, if any, from these expenditures. Moreover, the value of any design win will largely depend on the commercial success of our OEM customers’ products. There can be no assurance that we will continue to achieve design wins or that any design win will result in future revenues. We are developing a subscription business model for certain of our new APU products, which will take time to implement and will be subject to execution risks. The sales cycle for subscription products is different from our hardware sales business and we will need to implement strategies to manage customer retention, which may be more volatile than the hardware sales to OEM customers. We anticipate that there will be quarterly fluctuations in the revenue and expenses associated with this new license-based business as we optimize the sales process for our target customers. Furthermore, because of the time it takes to build a meaningful subscription business, we expect to incur significant expenses relating to the subscription business before generating revenue from that new business. Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist stockholders or others. We may be subject to actions or proposals from stockholders or others that may not align with our business strategies or the interests of our other stockholders. Responding to such actions can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our business and operations, and divert the attention of our board of directors, management, and employees from the pursuit of our business strategies. Such activities could interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan. Activist stockholders or others may create perceived uncertainties as to the future direction of our business or strategy which may be exploited by our competitors and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and potential customers, and may affect our relationships with current customers, vendors, investors, and other third parties. In addition, a proxy contest for the election of directors at our annual meeting would require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses and require significant time and attention by management and our board of directors. The perceived uncertainties as to our future direction also could affect the market price and volatility of our securities. Claims that we infringe third party intellectual property rights could seriously harm our business and require us to incur significant costs. There has been significant litigation in the semiconductor industry involving patents and other intellectual property rights. We were previously involved in protracted patent infringement litigation, and we could become subject to additional claims or litigation in the future as a result of allegations that we infringe others’ intellectual property rights or that our use of intellectual property otherwise violates the law. Claims that our products infringe the proprietary rights of others would force us to defend ourselves and possibly our customers, distributors or manufacturers against the alleged infringement. Any such litigation regarding intellectual property could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, changing our products or processes to avoid infringing the rights of others may be costly or impractical. If any claims received in the future were to be upheld, the consequences to us could require us to: • stop selling our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property; 28 • • • obtain a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; pay damages; or redesign those products that use the disputed technology. Although patent disputes in the semiconductor industry have often been settled through cross-licensing arrangements, we may not be able in any or every instance to settle an alleged patent infringement claim through a cross-licensing arrangement in part because we have a more limited patent portfolio than many of our competitors. If a successful claim is made against us or any of our customers and a license is not made available to us on commercially reasonable terms or we are required to pay substantial damages or awards, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Our acquisition of companies or technologies could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and adversely affect our operating results. In November 2015, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of privately held MikaMonu Group Ltd., a development-stage, Israel-based company that specializes in in-place associative computing for markets including big data, computer vision and cyber security. We also acquired substantially all of the assets related to the SRAM memory device product line of Sony Corporation in 2009. We intend to supplement our internal development activities by seeking opportunities to make additional acquisitions or investments in companies, assets or technologies that we believe are complementary or strategic. Other than the MikaMonu and Sony acquisitions, we have not made any such acquisitions or investments, and therefore our experience as an organization in making such acquisitions and investments is limited. In connection with the MikaMonu acquisition, we are subject to risks related to potential problems, delays or unanticipated costs that may be encountered in the development of products based on the MikaMonu technology and the establishment of new markets and customer relationships for the potential new products. In addition, in connection with any future acquisitions or investments we may make, we face numerous other risks, including: • • • • • • • • difficulties in integrating operations, technologies, products and personnel; diversion of financial and managerial resources from existing operations; risk of overpaying for or misjudging the strategic fit of an acquired company, asset or technology; problems or liabilities stemming from defects of an acquired product or intellectual property litigation that may result from offering the acquired product in our markets; challenges in retaining key employees to maximize the value of the acquisition or investment; inability to generate sufficient return on investment; incurrence of significant one-time write-offs; and delays in customer purchases due to uncertainty. If we proceed with additional acquisitions or investments, we may be required to use a considerable amount of our cash, or to finance the transaction through debt or equity securities offerings, which may decrease our financial liquidity or dilute our stockholders and affect the market price of our stock. As a result, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be harmed. 29 A n n u a l R e p o r t If we are unable to recruit or retain qualified personnel, our business and product development efforts could be harmed. We must continue to identify, recruit, hire, train, retain and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing and administrative personnel. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we may not be able to successfully recruit, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. We may encounter difficulties in recruiting and retaining a sufficient number of qualified engineers, which could harm our ability to develop new products and adversely impact our relationships with existing and future end-users at a critical stage of development. The failure to recruit and retain necessary technical, managerial, sales, marketing and administrative personnel could harm our business and our ability to obtain new OEM customers and develop new products. Our business will suffer if we are unable to protect our intellectual property. Our success and ability to compete depends in large part upon protecting our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark laws and non-disclosure and other contractual agreements to protect our proprietary rights. These agreements and measures may not be sufficient to protect our technology from third-party infringement. Monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Our attempts to enforce our intellectual property rights could be time consuming and costly. In the past, we have been involved in litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights and to protect our trade secrets. Additional litigation of this type may be necessary in the future. Any such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. If competitors are able to use our technology without our approval or compensation, our ability to compete effectively could be harmed. Any significant order cancellations or order deferrals could adversely affect our operating results. We typically sell products pursuant to purchase orders that customers can generally cancel or defer on short notice without incurring a significant penalty. Any significant cancellations or deferrals in the future could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Cancellations or deferrals could cause us to hold excess inventory, which could reduce our profit margins, increase product obsolescence and restrict our ability to fund our operations. We generally recognize revenue upon shipment of products to a customer. If a customer refuses to accept shipped products or does not pay for these products, we could miss future revenue projections or incur significant charges against our income, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results. If our business grows, such growth may place a significant strain on our management and operations and, as a result, our business may suffer. We are endeavoring to expand our business, and any growth that we are successful in achieving could place a significant strain on our management systems, infrastructure and other resources. To manage the potential growth of our operations and resulting increases in the number of our personnel, we will need to invest the necessary capital to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. Our controls, systems and procedures may prove to be inadequate should we experience significant growth. In addition, we may not have sufficient administrative staff to support our operations. For example, we currently have only four employees in our finance department in the United States, including our Chief Financial Officer. Furthermore, our officers have limited experience in managing large or rapidly growing businesses. If our management fails to respond effectively to changes in our business, our business may suffer. 30 Risks Related to Manufacturing and Product Development We may experience difficulties in transitioning to smaller geometry process technologies and other more advanced manufacturing process technologies, which may result in reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product deliveries and increased expenses. In order to remain competitive, we expect to continue to transition the manufacture of our products to smaller geometry process technologies. This transition will require us to migrate to new manufacturing processes for our products and redesign certain products. The manufacture and design of our products is complex, and we may experience difficulty in transitioning to smaller geometry process technologies or new manufacturing processes. These difficulties could result in reduced manufacturing yields, delays in product deliveries and increased expenses. We are dependent on our relationships with TSMC to transition successfully to smaller geometry process technologies and to more advanced manufacturing processes. If we or TSMC experience significant delays in this transition or fail to implement these transitions, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Manufacturing process technologies are subject to rapid change and require significant expenditures for research and development. We continuously evaluate the benefits of migrating to smaller geometry process technologies in order to improve performance and reduce costs. Historically, these migrations to new manufacturing processes have resulted in significant initial design and development costs associated with pre-production mask sets for the manufacture of new products with smaller geometry process technologies. For example, in the second quarter of fiscal 2019, we incurred approximately $1.0 million in research and development expense associated with a pre-production mask set that will not be used in production as part of the transition to our new 28 nanometer SRAM process technology for our APU product. We will incur similar expenses in the future as we continue to transition our products to smaller geometry processes. The costs inherent in the transition to new manufacturing process technologies will adversely affect our operating results and our gross margin. Our products are complex to design and manufacture and could contain defects, which could reduce revenues or result in claims against us. We develop complex products. Despite testing by us and our OEM customers, design or manufacturing errors may be found in existing or new products. These defects could result in a delay in recognition or loss of revenues, loss of market share or failure to achieve market acceptance. These defects may also cause us to incur significant warranty, support and repair costs, divert the attention of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts, result in a loss of market acceptance of our products and harm our relationships with our OEM customers. Our OEM customers could also seek and obtain damages from us for their losses. A product liability claim brought against us, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time consuming and costly to defend. Defects in wafers and other components used in our products and arising from the manufacturing of these products may not be fully recoverable from TSMC or our other suppliers. Risks Related to Our International Business and Operations Changes in Taiwan’s political, social and economic environment may affect our business performance. Because much of the manufacturing and testing of our products is conducted in Taiwan, our business performance may be affected by changes in Taiwan’s political, social and economic environment. For example, political instability or restrictions on transportation logistics for our products resulting from changes in the relationship among the United States, Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China could negatively impact our business. Any significant armed conflict related to this matter would be expected to materially and adversely 31 A n n u a l R e p o r t damage our business. Moreover, the role of the Taiwanese government in the Taiwanese economy is significant. Taiwanese policies toward economic liberalization, and laws and policies affecting technology companies, foreign investment, currency exchange rates, taxes and other matters could change, resulting in greater restrictions on our ability and our suppliers’ ability to do business and operate facilities in Taiwan. If any of these changes were to occur, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline. Our international business exposes us to additional risks. Products shipped to destinations outside of the United States accounted for 51.4%, 53.5% and 55.4% of our net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Moreover, a substantial portion of our products is manufactured and tested in Taiwan, and the software development for our associative computing products occurs in Israel. We intend to continue expanding our international business in the future. Conducting business outside of the United States subjects us to additional risks and challenges, including: • • • • • • • • potential political and economic instability in, or armed conflicts that involve or affect, the countries in which we, our customers and our suppliers are located; uncertainties regarding taxes, tariffs, quotas, export controls and license requirements, trade wars, policies that favor domestic companies over nondomestic companies, including government efforts to provide for the development and growth of local competitors, and other trade barriers; heightened price sensitivity from customers in emerging markets; compliance with a wide variety of foreign laws and regulations and unexpected changes in these laws and regulations; fluctuations in freight rates and transportation disruptions; difficulties and costs of staffing and managing personnel, distributors and representatives across different geographic areas and cultures, including assuring compliance with the U. S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other U. S. and foreign anti-corruption laws; difficulties in collecting accounts receivable and longer accounts receivable payment cycles; and limited protection for intellectual property rights in some countries. Moreover, our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, a portion of our cost of revenues and our operating expenses is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the New Taiwanese dollar and Israeli Shekel. As a result, appreciation or depreciation of other currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar could result in transaction gains or losses that could impact our operating results. We do not currently engage in currency hedging activities to reduce the risk of financial exposure from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. TSMC, as well as our other independent suppliers and many of our OEM customers, have operations in the Pacific Rim, an area subject to significant risk of earthquakes, typhoons and other natural disasters and adverse consequences related to the outbreak of contagious diseases. The foundry that manufactures our Fast SRAM and APU products, TSMC, and all of the principal independent suppliers that assemble and test our products are located in Taiwan. Many of our customers are also located in the Pacific Rim. The risk of an earthquake in these Pacific Rim locations is significant. The occurrence of an earthquake, typhoon or other natural disaster near the fabrication facilities of TSMC or our other independent suppliers could result in damage, power outages and other disruptions that impair their production and assembly capacity. Any disruption resulting from such events could cause significant delays in the production or shipment of 32 our products until we are able to shift our manufacturing, assembling, packaging or production testing from the affected contractor to another third-party vendor. In such an event, we may not be able to obtain alternate foundry capacity on favorable terms, or at all. The recent COVID-19 global pandemic, along with the previous outbreaks of SARS, H1N1 and the Avian Flu, curtailed travel between and within countries, including in the Asia-Pacific region. Outbreaks of new contagious diseases or the resurgence of existing diseases that significantly affect the Asia-Pacific region could disrupt the operations of our key suppliers and manufacturing partners. In addition, our business could be harmed if such an outbreak resulted in travel being restricted, the implementation of stay-at-home or shelter-in-place orders or if it adversely affected the operations of our OEM customers or the demand for our products or our OEM customers’ products. We do not maintain sufficient business interruption and other insurance policies to compensate us for all losses that may occur. Any losses or damages incurred by us as a result of a catastrophic event or any other significant uninsured loss in excess of our insurance policy limits could have a material adverse effect on our business. The United States could materially modify certain international trade agreements, or change tax provisions related to the global manufacturing and sales of our products. A portion of our business activities are conducted in foreign countries, including Taiwan and Israel. Our business benefits from free trade agreements, and we also rely on various U.S. corporate tax provisions related to international commerce as we develop, manufacture, market and sell our products globally. Any action to materially modify international trade agreements, change corporate tax policy related to international commerce or mandate domestic production of goods, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Some of our products are incorporated into advanced military electronics, and changes in international geopolitical circumstances and domestic budget considerations may hurt our business. Some of our products are incorporated into advanced military electronics such as radar and guidance systems. Military expenditures and appropriations for such purchases rose significantly in recent years. However, if current U.S. military operations around the world are scaled back, demand for our products for use in military applications may decrease, and our operating results could suffer. Domestic budget considerations may also adversely affect our operating results. For example, if governmental appropriations for military purchases of electronic devices that include our products are reduced, our revenues will likely decline. Risks Relating to Our Common Stock and the Securities Market The trading price of our common stock is subject to fluctuation and is likely to be volatile. The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including: • • • • the establishment of a market for our new associative computing products; actual or anticipated declines in operating results; changes in financial estimates or recommendations by securities analysts; the institution of legal proceedings against us or significant developments in such proceedings; A n n u a l R e p o r t 33 • • • • announcements by us or our competitors of financial results, new products, significant technological innovations, contracts, acquisitions, strategic relationships, joint ventures, capital commitments or other events; changes in industry estimates of demand for Very Fast SRAM, RadHard and RadTolerant products; the gain or loss of significant orders or customers; recruitment or departure of key personnel; and • market conditions in our industry, the industries of our customers and the economy as a whole. In recent years, the stock market in general, and the market for technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme price fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. The market price of our common stock might experience significant fluctuations in the future, including fluctuations unrelated to our performance. These fluctuations could materially adversely affect our business relationships, our ability to obtain future financing on favorable terms or otherwise harm our business. In addition, in the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially acute for us because the extreme volatility of market prices of technology companies has resulted in a larger number of securities class action claims against them. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources. This could harm our business and cause the value of our stock to decline. We may need to raise additional capital in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all, and which may cause dilution to existing stockholders. We may need to seek additional funding in the future. We do not know if we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, if and when needed, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, and we may be required to reduce operating costs, which could seriously harm our business. In addition, if we issue equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock. Our executive officers, directors and entities affiliated with them hold a substantial percentage of our common stock. As of May 31, 2023, our executive officers, directors and entities affiliated with them beneficially owned approximately 32% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise substantial influence over, and may be able to effectively control, matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, which could have the effect of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring control over or merging with us. The provisions of our charter documents might inhibit potential acquisition bids that a stockholder might believe are desirable, and the market price of our common stock could be lower as a result. Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors can fix the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the preferred stock without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The issuance of shares of preferred stock might delay or prevent a change in control transaction. As a result, the market price of our common stock and the voting and other rights of our stockholders might be adversely affected. The issuance of preferred stock might result in the loss of voting control to 34 other stockholders. We have no current plans to issue any shares of preferred stock. Our charter documents also contain other provisions, which might discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition, including: • • • our stockholders have no right to act by written consent; our stockholders have no right to call a special meeting of stockholders; and our stockholders must comply with advance notice requirements to nominate directors or submit proposals for consideration at stockholder meetings. These provisions could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock. As a result, these provisions might prevent the market price of our common stock from increasing substantially in response to actual or rumored takeover attempts. These provisions might also prevent changes in our management. Use of a portion of our cash reserves to repurchase shares of our common stock presents potential risks and disadvantages to us and our continuing stockholders. Since November 2008, we have repurchased and retired an aggregate of 12,004,779 shares of our common stock at a total cost of $60.7 million, including 3,846,153 shares repurchased at a total cost of $25 million pursuant to a modified “Dutch auction” self-tender offer that we completed in August 2014 and additional shares repurchased in the open market pursuant to our stock repurchase program. At March 31, 2023, we had outstanding authorization from our Board of Directors to purchase up to an additional $4.3 million of our common stock from time to time under our repurchase program. Although our Board has determined that these repurchases are in the best interests of our stockholders, they expose us to certain risks including: • • • the risks resulting from a reduction in the size of our “public float,” which is the number of shares of our common stock that are owned by non-affiliated stockholders and available for trading in the securities markets, which may reduce the volume of trading in our shares and result in reduced liquidity and, potentially, lower trading prices; the risk that our stock price could decline and that we would be able to repurchase shares of our common stock in the future at a lower price per share than the prices we have paid in our tender offer and repurchase program; and the risk that the use of a portion of our cash reserves for this purpose has reduced, or may reduce, the amount of cash that would otherwise be available to pursue potential cash acquisitions or other strategic business opportunities. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties Our executive offices, our principal administration, marketing and sales operations and a portion of our research and development operations are located in a 44,277 square foot facility in Sunnyvale, California, which we purchased in fiscal 2010. In addition, we occupy approximately 25,250 square feet in a facility located in Hsin Chu, Taiwan under a lease expiring in August 2023. This facility supports our manufacturing activities. We believe that both our Sunnyvale and Taiwan facilities are adequate for our needs for the foreseeable future. We also lease space in the United States in the states of Georgia and Texas and in Israel. The aggregate annual gross rent for our leased facilities was approximately $764,000 in fiscal 2023. 35 A n n u a l R e p o r t Item 3. Legal Proceedings None. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information, Holders of Common Stock and Dividends Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “GSIT”. On May 31, 2023, there were approximately 21 holders of record of our common stock. Because many of such shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial holders of our common stock represented by these record holders. We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Our Board of Directors has authorized us to repurchase, at management’s discretion, shares of our common stock. Under the repurchase program, we may repurchase shares from time to time on the open market or in private transactions. The specific timing and amount of the repurchases will be dependent on market conditions, securities law limitations and other factors. The repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. During the quarter ended March 31, 2023, we did not repurchase any of our shares under the repurchase program. Item 6. Reserved 36 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ substantially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. The following discussion should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis generally covers our financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, including year-over-year comparisons versus the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 includes year-over-year comparisons versus the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 in Item 7 of Part II, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Overview We are a leading provider of high-performance semiconductor memory solutions for in-place associative computing applications in high growth markets such as artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, including natural language processing and computer vision. Our initial associative processing unit (“APU”) products are focused on applications using similarity search, but have not resulted in material revenues to date. Similarity search is used in visual search queries for ecommerce, computer vision, drug discovery, cyber security and service markets such as NoSQL, Elasticsearch, and OpenSearch. We also design, develop and market static random access memories, or SRAMs, that operate at speeds of less than 10 nanoseconds, which we refer to as Very Fast SRAMs, primarily for the networking and telecommunications and the military/defense and aerospace markets. We are subject to the highly cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, which has experienced significant fluctuations, often in connection with fluctuations in demand for the products in which semiconductor devices are used. Our revenues have been substantially impacted by significant fluctuations in sales to our largest customer, Nokia. We expect that future direct and indirect sales to Nokia will continue to fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis. The networking and telecommunications market has accounted for a significant portion of our net revenues in the past and has declined during the past several years and is expected to continue to decline. In anticipation of the decline of the networking and telecommunications market, we have been using the revenue generated by the sales of high- speed synchronous SRAM products to finance the development of our new in-place associative computing solutions and the marketing and sale of new types of SRAM products such as radiation-hardened and radiation-tolerant SRAMs. However, with no debt and substantial liquidity, we believe we are in a better financial position than many other companies of our size. Our revenues in recent years have been impacted by changes in customer buying patterns and communication limitations related to COVID-19 restrictions that required a significant number of our customer contacts to work from home. Our results for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2022 demonstrated the challenges that we have faced during the COVID-19 global pandemic, which restricted the activities of our sales force and distributors, reduced customer demand and caused the postponement of investment in certain customer sectors. These challenges impacted us as we entered new markets and engaged with target customers to sell our new APU product. Industry conferences and on-site training workshops, which are typically used for building a sales pipeline, were limited due to COVID-19 related restrictions. We adapted our sales strategies for the COVID-19 environment, where we could not have face-to-face meetings and conduct secure meetings with government and defense customers. While the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, the significant fluctuations in energy prices, worldwide inflationary pressures, rising interest rates and decline in the global economic environment have had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on our business and financial condition. Furthermore, the easing of supply chain shortages and prior buffer stock purchases from significant customers have led to a decrease in fiscal 2023 revenues. A n n u a l R e p o r t 37 As of March 31, 2023, we had cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $30.6 million, with no debt. We have a team in-place with tremendous depth and breadth of experience and knowledge, with a legacy business that is providing an ongoing source of funding for the development of new product lines. We have a strong balance sheet and liquidity position that we anticipate will provide financial flexibility and security in the current environment of economic uncertainty. Generally, our primary source of liquidity is cash equivalents and short-term investments. Our level of cash equivalents and short-term investments has historically been sufficient to meet our current and longer term operating and capital needs. We believe that during the next 12 months, continued inflationary pressures and rising interest rates will continue to negatively impact general economic activity and demand in our end markets. Although it is difficult to estimate the length or gravity of the continued inflationary pressures and rising interest rates, the impact of recent bank failures, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment, are expected to have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, including potential impairments, and liquidity in fiscal 2024. In November 2022, we announced measures taken to reduce our operating expenses by approximately $7.0 million on an annualized basis, primarily from salary reductions related to reduced headcount and salary decreases for certain retained employees, as well as targeted reductions in research and development spending. These strategic cost reduction measures are expected to enable us to better focus on our operational resources on advancing our proprietary APU technology. None of the Gemini-II chip development and core APU software development, including the APU compiler, will be affected by the reduction in research and development spending. The APU marketing, sales, and APU engineering efforts will retain priority in the budget. The spending reductions are not expected to impact the launch of Gemini-I in target markets, including SAR, search, and SaaS. The cost reduction initiative is expected to be completed by September 30, 2023 and will result in an approximate 15% decrease in our global workforce. In total, we expect to incur approximately $917,000 in cash expenditures for termination costs, including the payout of accrued vacation, of which $490,000 was incurred in fiscal 2023. Revenues. Substantially all of our revenues are derived from sales of our Very Fast SRAM products. Sales to networking and telecommunications OEMs accounted for 32% to 53% of our net revenues during our last three fiscal years. We also sell our products to OEMs that manufacture products for military and aerospace applications such as radar and guidance systems and satellites, for test and measurement applications such as high-speed testers, for automotive applications such as smart cruise control, and for medical applications such as ultrasound and CAT scan equipment. As is typical in the semiconductor industry, the selling prices of our products generally decline over the life of the product. Our ability to increase net revenues, therefore, is dependent upon our ability to increase unit sales volumes of existing products and to introduce and sell new products with higher average selling prices in quantities sufficient to compensate for the anticipated declines in selling prices of our more mature products. Although we expect the average selling prices of individual products to decline over time, we believe that, over the next several quarters, our overall average selling prices will increase due to a continuing shift in product mix to a higher percentage of higher price, higher density products, and to a lesser extent, recent price increases to our customers due to supply constraints. Our ability to increase unit sales volumes is dependent primarily upon increases in customer demand but, particularly in periods of increasing demand, can also be affected by our ability to increase production through the availability of increased wafer fabrication capacity from TSMC, our wafer supplier, and our ability to increase the number of good integrated circuit die produced from each wafer through die size reductions and yield enhancement activities. We may experience fluctuations in quarterly net revenues for a number of reasons. Historically, orders on hand at the beginning of each quarter are insufficient to meet our revenue objectives for that quarter and are generally cancelable up to 30 days prior to scheduled delivery. Accordingly, we depend on obtaining and shipping orders in the same quarter to achieve our revenue objectives. In addition, the timing of product releases, purchase 38 orders and product availability could result in significant product shipments at the end of a quarter. Failure to ship these products by the end of the quarter may adversely affect our operating results. Furthermore, our customers may delay scheduled delivery dates and/or cancel orders within specified timeframes without significant penalty. We sell our products through our direct sales force, international and domestic sales representatives and distributors. Our revenues have been and are expected to continue to be impacted by changes in customer buying patterns and communication limitations related to changes in working habits that have resulted in a significant number of our customer contacts working from home. Our customer contracts, which may be in the form of purchase orders, contracts or purchase agreements, contain performance obligations for delivery of agreed upon products. Delivery of all performance obligations contained within a contract with a customer typically occurs at the same time (or within the same accounting period). Transfer of control occurs at the time of shipment or at the time the product is pulled from consignment as that is the point at which delivery has occurred, title and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, and we have a right to payment. Thus, we will recognize revenue upon shipment of the product for direct sales and sales to our distributors. Sales to consignment warehouses, who purchase products from us for use by contract manufacturers, are recorded upon delivery to the contract manufacturer. Historically, a small number of OEM customers have accounted for a substantial portion of our net revenues, and we expect that significant customer concentration will continue for the foreseeable future. Many of our OEMs use contract manufacturers to manufacture their equipment. Accordingly, a significant percentage of our net revenues is derived from sales to these contract manufacturers and to consignment warehouses. In addition, a significant portion of our sales are made to foreign and domestic distributors who resell our products to OEMs, as well as their contract manufacturers. Direct sales to contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses accounted for 19.8%, 31.0% and 43.7% of our net revenues for fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Sales to foreign and domestic distributors accounted for 77.5%, 66.8% and 54.7% of our net revenues for fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of our net revenues in one or more of the following periods: Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2022 2021 2023 Contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses: Flextronics Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sanmina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.4 % 16.0 % 21.1 % 11.2 8.8 21.5 Distributors: Avnet Logistics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nexcomm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48.1 16.6 38.0 17.2 29.8 14.7 Nokia was our largest customer in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021. Nokia purchases products directly from us and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Based on information provided to us by its contract manufacturers and our distributors, purchases by Nokia represented approximately 17%, 29% and 39% of our net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our revenues have been substantially impacted by significant fluctuations in sales to Nokia, and we expect that future direct and indirect sales to Nokia will continue to fluctuate substantially on a quarterly basis and that such fluctuations may significantly affect our operating results in future periods. To our knowledge, none of our other OEM customers accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 or 2021. Cost of Revenues. Our cost of revenues consists primarily of wafer fabrication costs, wafer sort, assembly, test and burn-in expenses, the amortized cost of production mask sets, stock-based compensation and the cost of materials and overhead from operations. All of our wafer manufacturing and assembly operations, and a significant A n n u a l R e p o r t 39 portion of our wafer sort testing operations, are outsourced. Accordingly, most of our cost of revenues consists of payments to TSMC and independent assembly and test houses. Because we do not have long-term, fixed-price supply contracts, our wafer fabrication, assembly and other outsourced manufacturing costs are subject to the cyclical fluctuations in demand for semiconductors. We have experienced increased costs as a result of supply chain constraints for wafers and outsourced assembly, burn-in and test operations. We expect these increased manufacturing costs will continue into fiscal 2024. Cost of revenues also includes expenses related to supply chain management, quality assurance, and final product testing and documentation control activities conducted at our headquarters in Sunnyvale, California and our branch operations in Taiwan. Gross Profit. Our gross profit margins vary among our products and are generally greater on our radiation hardened and radiation tolerant SRAMs, on our higher density products and, within a particular density, greater on our higher speed and industrial temperature products. We expect that our overall gross margins will fluctuate from period to period as a result of shifts in product mix, changes in average selling prices and our ability to control our cost of revenues, including costs associated with outsourced wafer fabrication and product assembly and testing. Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for design engineers and other technical personnel, the cost of developing prototypes, stock-based compensation and fees paid to consultants. We charge all research and development expenses to operations as incurred. We charge mask costs used in production to cost of revenues over a 12-month period. However, we charge costs related to pre-production mask sets, which are not used in production, to research and development expenses at the time they are incurred. These charges often arise as we transition to new process technologies and, accordingly, can cause research and development expenses to fluctuate on a quarterly basis. We believe that continued investment in research and development is critical to our long-term success, and we expect to continue to devote significant resources to product development activities. In particular, we are devoting substantial resources to the development of a new category of in-place associative computing products. Accordingly, we expect that our research and development expenses will continue to be substantial in future periods and may lead to operating losses in some periods. Such expenses as a percentage of net revenues may fluctuate from period to period. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of commissions paid to independent sales representatives, salaries, stock-based compensation and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales, marketing, administrative, finance and human resources activities, professional fees, costs associated with the promotion of our products and other corporate expenses. We expect that our sales and marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars in future periods if we are able to grow and expand our sales force but that, to the extent our revenues increase in future periods, these expenses will generally decline as a percentage of net revenues. We also expect that, in support of any future growth that we are able to achieve, general and administrative expenses will generally increase in absolute dollars. Acquisition On November 23, 2015, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of privately held MikaMonu Group Ltd. (“MikaMonu”), a development-stage, Israel-based company that specialized in in-place associative computing for markets including big data, computer vision and cyber security. MikaMonu, located in Tel Aviv, held 12 United States patents and had a number of pending patent applications. The acquisition was undertaken in order to gain access to the MikaMonu patents and the potential markets, and new customer base in those markets, that can be served by new products that we are developing using the in- place associative computing technology. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase under authoritative guidance for business combinations. The purchase price of the acquisition was allocated to the intangible assets acquired, with the excess 40 of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired recorded as goodwill. We perform a goodwill impairment test near the end of each fiscal year and if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, on an interim basis. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, we paid the former MikaMonu shareholders initial cash consideration of approximately $4.9 million, and cash retention payments totaling $2.5 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019 to the former MikaMonu shareholders, that were conditioned on the continued employment of Dr. Avidan Akerib, MikaMonu’s co-founder and chief technologist. We will also make “earnout” payments to the former MikaMonu shareholders in cash or shares of our common stock, at our discretion, during a period of up to ten years following the closing if certain product development milestones and revenue targets for products based on the MikaMonu technology are achieved. Earnout amounts of $750,000 were paid in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 based on the achievement of certain product development milestones. Earnout payments, up to a maximum of $30.0 million, equal to 5% of net revenues from the sale of qualifying products in excess of certain thresholds, will be made quarterly through December 31, 2025. The portion of the retention payment made to Dr. Akerib (approximately $1.2 million) was recorded as compensation expense over the period that his services were provided to us. The portion of the retention payment made to the other former MikaMonu shareholders (approximately $1.3 million) plus the maximum amount of the potential earnout payments totals approximately $30.0 million at March 31, 2023. We determined that the fair value of this contingent consideration liability was $5.8 million at the acquisition date. The contingent consideration liability is included in contingent consideration, non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2022 and 2023 in the amount of $2.7 million and $1.1 million, respectively. At each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability will be re-measured at then current fair value with changes recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Changes in any of the inputs may result in significant adjustments to the recorded fair value. Re-measurement of the contingent consideration liability during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 resulted in a decrease of the contingent consideration liability of $1.9 million. The allocation of the purchase price to acquired identifiable intangible assets and goodwill was based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair value allocated to patents was $3.5 million and the residual value allocated to goodwill was $8.0 million. A n n u a l R e p o r t 41 Results of Operations The following table sets forth statement of operations data as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated: Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses: Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest and other income (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended March 31, 2022 2023 100.0 % 40.4 59.6 100.0 % 44.5 55.5 79.3 33.5 112.8 (53.2) 0.7 (52.5) 1.3 (53.8) 73.9 30.6 104.5 (49.0) (0.2) (49.2) (0.2) (49.0) Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2023 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2022 Net Revenues. Net revenues decreased by 11.1% from $33.4 million in fiscal 2022 to $29.7 million in fiscal 2023. The overall average selling price of all units shipped in fiscal 2023 increased by 2.1% in fiscal 2023 compared to the prior fiscal year. The decrease in net revenues in fiscal 2023 compared to fiscal 2022 is related to the decline in the global economic environment during the period. Units shipped decreased by 13.7% in fiscal 2023 compared to fiscal 2022. The networking and telecommunications markets represented 32% and 49% of shipments in fiscal 2023 and in fiscal 2022, respectively. Direct and indirect sales to Nokia, currently our largest customer, decreased by $4.6 million from $9.6 million in fiscal 2022 to $5.0 million fiscal 2023 due to buffer stock purchases in fiscal 2022 which did not recur in fiscal 2023 as supply shortages eased. Shipments to Nokia will continue to fluctuate as a result of demand and shipments to its end customers. Shipments of our SigmaQuad product line accounted for 49.1% of total shipments in fiscal 2023 compared to 51.2% of total shipments in fiscal 2022. While recent customer order patterns have been particularly variable, these fluctuations are related to economic and external factors, which include the rapid rise in energy prices, worldwide inflationary pressures, rising interest rates and the decline in the global economic environment. Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues decreased by 19.1% from $14.8 million in fiscal 2022 to $12.0 million in fiscal 2023. Cost of revenues decreased as a result of the lower volume of units shipped in fiscal 2023 compared to fiscal 2022 as discussed above. Cost of revenues included a provision for excess and obsolete inventories of $226,000 in fiscal 2023 compared to $402,000 in fiscal 2022. Cost of revenues included stock-based compensation expense of $202,000 and $248,000, respectively, in fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022. Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased by 4.6% from $18.5 million in fiscal 2022 to $17.7 million in fiscal 2023. Gross margin increased from 55.5% in fiscal 2022 to 59.6% in fiscal 2023. The change in gross profit is primarily related to the change in net revenues discussed above. The increase in gross margin was primarily related to changes in the mix of products and customers and, to a lesser extent, a 20% price increase effective in December 2021 for the majority of our products. Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased 4.5% from $24.7 million in fiscal 2022 to $23.6 million in fiscal 2023. The reduction in research and development spending in fiscal 42 2023 reflects the impact of cost reduction measures implemented in the quarter ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in research and development spending was primarily related to decreases of $1.7 million in payroll related expenses and $360,000 in stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by increases of $436,000 in outside consulting expenses and $253,000 in software maintenance expense. Research and development expenses included stock-based compensation expense of $1.3 million and $1.7 million in fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022, respectively. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 1.4% from $10.2 million in fiscal 2022 to $10.4 million in fiscal 2023. In fiscal 2023, the value of contingent consideration liability resulting from the MikaMonu acquisition decreased by $1.5 million compared to a decrease of $1.6 million in fiscal 2022 as a result of re-measurement of contingent consideration liability in each year. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses included increases of $348,000 in professional fees and $121,000 in facility related expenses, partially offset by decreases of $423,000 in payroll related expenses and $118,000 in stock-based compensation expense. Payroll related expenses included approximately $200,000 for severance payments made to terminated employees as a result of our cost cutting measures discussed above. Selling, general and administrative expenses included stock-based compensation expense of $951,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, in fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022. Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net. Interest and other income (expense), net increased from an expense of $60,000 in fiscal 2022 to income of $202,000 in fiscal 2023. Interest income increased by $252,000 due to higher interest rates received on cash and short-term and long-term investments, partially offset by lower levels of short-term and long-term investments. The foreign currency exchange loss decreased from ($131,000) in fiscal 2022 to ($121,000) in fiscal 2023. The exchange loss in each period was primarily related to our Taiwan branch operations and operations in Israel. Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased from a benefit from income taxes of ($45,000) in fiscal 2022 to a provision of $372,000 in fiscal 2023. The benefit for income taxes in fiscal 2022 included a benefit of ($220,000) related to the approval by the Israel tax authorities of a “Preferred Company” tax rate that was retroactively applied to fiscal 2018 and subsequent fiscal years. Because we recorded a cumulative three-year loss on a U.S. tax basis for the year ended March 31, 2023 and the realization of our deferred tax assets is questionable, we recorded a tax provision reflecting a valuation allowance of $17.5 million in net deferred tax assets in fiscal 2023. Reductions in uncertain tax benefits due to lapses in the statute of limitations were not significant in the years ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. Net Loss. Net loss was ($16.4) million in fiscal 2022 compared to a net loss of ($16.0) million in fiscal 2023. This decrease was primarily due to the changes in net revenues, gross profit and operating expenses discussed above. A n n u a l R e p o r t 43 Liquidity and Capital Resources As of March 31, 2023, our principal sources of liquidity were cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $30.6 million compared to $44.0 million as of March 31, 2022. Cash, cash equivalents and short- term investments totaling $21.4 million were held in foreign locations as of March 31, 2023. Net cash used in operating activities was $16.8 million and $13.8 million for fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022, respectively. The primary uses of cash in fiscal 2023 were the net loss of $16.0 million, a reduction in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $2.3 million and an increase in inventories of $2.0 million. The reduction in accrued expenses and other liabilities was primarily related to the payment of fiscal 2022 year-end accruals for incentive compensation. The uses of cash in fiscal 2023 were less than the net loss due to non-cash items including stock- based compensation of $2.5 million and depreciation and amortization expenses of $1.0 million. The primary source of cash in fiscal 2023 was a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.1 million. The primary uses of cash in fiscal 2022 were the net loss of $16.4 million and increases in accounts receivable, inventory and accrued expenses and other liabilities. The uses of cash in fiscal 2022 were less than the net loss due to non-cash items including stock-based compensation of $3.0 million and depreciation and amortization expenses of $1.0 million. Net cash provided by investing activities was $6.7 million and $4.2 million in fiscal 2023 and 2022, respectively. Investment activities in fiscal 2023 primarily consisted of the maturity of certificates of deposit and agency bonds of $7.0 million partially offset by the purchase of property and equipment of $316,000. Investment activities in fiscal 2022 primarily consisted of the maturity of certificates of deposit and agency bonds of $12.1 million partially offset by the purchase of certificates of deposit of $7.2 million. Cash provided by financing activities was $402,000 and $2.4 million in fiscal 2023 and fiscal 2022, respectively and consisted of the net proceeds from the sale of common stock pursuant to our employee stock plans. At March 31, 2023, we had total minimum lease obligations of approximately $686,000 from April 1, 2023 through February 29, 2024, under non-cancelable operating leases for our facilities. While the disruptions in the capital markets as a result of rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment have created significant uncertainty as to general economic and capital market conditions for the remainder of 2023 and beyond, we believe that our existing balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, and cash flow expected to be generated from our future operations, will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months, although we could be required, or could elect, to seek additional funding prior to that time. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of revenue growth, if any, that we experience, any additional manufacturing cost increases resulting from supply constraints, the extent to which we utilize subcontractors, the levels of inventory and accounts receivable that we maintain, the timing and extent of spending to support our product development efforts and the expansion of our sales and marketing efforts. A material decline in the global economic environment could result in a need to raise additional capital or incur additional indebtedness to fund strategic initiatives or operating activities, particularly if we pursue additional acquisitions of businesses, products or technologies. We cannot assure you that additional equity or debt financing, if required, will be available on terms that are acceptable or at all. As of March 31, 2023, we had $1.7 million in purchase obligations for facility leases and software and test purchase obligations that are binding commitments, of which $1.3 million are payable in the next twelve months and $416,000 are committed in the long term. As of March 31, 2023, the current portion of our unrecognized tax benefits was $0, and the long-term portion was $0. 44 In connection with the acquisition of MikaMonu on November 23, 2015, we are required to make contingent consideration payments to the former MikaMonu shareholders conditioned upon the achievement of certain revenue targets for products based on the MikaMonu technology. As of March 31, 2023, the accrual for potential payment of contingent consideration was $1.1 million. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are inherent in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and include estimates affecting obsolete and excess inventory, contingent consideration and the valuation of intangibles and goodwill. We believe that we consistently apply these judgments and estimates and that our financial statements and accompanying notes fairly represent our financial results for all periods presented. However, any errors in these judgments and estimates may have a material impact on our balance sheet and statement of operations. Critical accounting estimates, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission, are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require our most difficult and subjective judgments and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those regarding the valuation of inventories, contingent consideration and the valuation of intangibles and goodwill. Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control which occurs at the point at which delivery has occurred, title and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, and the Company has a right to payment. For all transactions apart from consignment sales, the Company will recognize revenue upon shipment of the product. For consignment sales, revenue is recognized at the time that the product is pulled from consignment warehouses. There was no revenue in fiscal 2023 resulting from sales of SaaS applications. See the policy in Note 2 – Revenue Recognition. Valuation of Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, cost being determined on a weighted average basis. Our inventory write-down allowance is established when conditions indicate that the selling price of our products could be less than cost due to physical deterioration, obsolescence based on changes in technology and demand, changes in price levels, or other causes. We consider the need to establish the allowance for excess inventory generally based on inventory levels in excess of 12 months of forecasted customer demand for each specific product, which is based on historical sales and expected future orders. At any point in time, some portion of our inventory is subject to the risk of being materially in excess of our projected demand. Additionally, our average selling prices could decline due to market or other conditions, which creates a risk that costs of manufacturing our inventory may not be recovered. These factors contribute to the risk that we may be required to record additional inventory write-downs in the future, which could be material. In addition, if actual market conditions are more favorable than expected, inventory previously written down may be sold to customers resulting in lower cost of sales and higher income from operations than expected in that period. Accounting for Income Taxes. We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. We make certain estimates and judgments in the calculation of tax liabilities and the determination of deferred tax assets, which arise from temporary differences between tax and financial statement recognition methods. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that management estimates is more likely than not 45 A n n u a l R e p o r t to be realized. Due to historical losses in the U.S., we have a full valuation allowance on our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. If, in the future we determine that we are likely to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to deferred tax assets would be added to earnings in the period such determination is made. In addition, the calculation of tax liabilities involves inherent uncertainty in the application of complex tax laws. We record tax reserves for additional taxes that we estimate we may be required to pay as a result of future potential examinations by federal and state taxing authorities. If the payment ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of these tax reserves would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period we determine such reserves are no longer necessary. If an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our estimate of tax liabilities, an additional charge to provision for income taxes will result. See the policy in Note 6 – Income Taxes. Stock-Based Compensation Expense. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the statement of operations is based on options ultimately expected to vest, reduced by the amount of estimated forfeitures. We chose the straight-line method of allocating compensation cost over the requisite service period of the related award in accordance with the authoritative guidance. We calculated the expected term based on the historical average period of time that options were outstanding as adjusted for expected changes in future exercise patterns, which, for options granted in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, resulted in an expected term of approximately 4.6 to 5.0 years, 5.0 years and 5.0 years, respectively. We used our historical volatility to estimate expected volatility in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding to the expected life of the options. The dividend yield is 0% based on the fact that we have never paid dividends and have no present intention to pay dividends. Determining some of these assumptions requires significant judgment and changes to these assumptions could result in a significant change to the calculation of stock-based compensation in future periods. See Accounting for stock-based compensation in Note 1. Contingent Consideration. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability potentially payable in connection with our acquisition of MikaMonu was initially determined as of the acquisition date using unobservable inputs. These inputs included the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows, the probability of achievement of the forecast, and a risk-adjusted discount rate to adjust the probability-weighted cash flows to their present value. Since the acquisition date, at each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability is re-measured at its then current fair value with changes recorded selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Due to revisions to the amount of expected revenue, the timing of revenue to be recognized prior to the end of the earnout period and the probability of achievement of the APU revenue forecast, the contingent consideration liability decreased by $1.7 million from March 31, 2022 to March 31, 2023. Future changes to any of the inputs, including forecasted revenues from a new product, which are inherently difficult to estimate, or the valuation model selected, may result in material adjustments to the recorded fair value. Valuation of Goodwill and Intangibles. Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. We test for goodwill impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset is more likely than not impaired. We have one reporting unit. We assess goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of February in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. We had a goodwill balance of $8.0 million as of both March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2022. The goodwill resulted from the acquisition of MikaMonu Group Ltd. in fiscal 2016. We completed our annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023 and concluded that there was no impairment, as the fair value of our sole reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, we identified sustained declines in our stock price that resulted in our market capitalization being below the carrying value of our stockholders’ equity. We concluded the sustained declines in our stock price were triggering events and proceeded with quantitative goodwill impairment assessments. 46 The results of the quantitative goodwill impairment assessments that we performed indicated the fair value of our sole reporting unit exceeded its carrying value as of December 31, 2022, February 28, 2023, and March 31, 2023. The quantitative impairment assessments were performed as of December 1, 2022, February 28, 2023, and March 31, 2023, utilizing an equal weighting of the income approach and the market comparable method. The analysis required the comparison of our carrying value with our fair value, with an impairment recorded for any excess of carrying value over the fair value. The income approach utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of our single reporting unit. Key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included, but are not limited to, a discount rate of approximately 22% to account for risk in achieving the forecast and a terminal growth rate for cash flows of 2%. The market comparable method was used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit by multiplying forecasted revenue by a market multiple. The revenue market multiple was calculated by comparing the enterprise value to revenue for comparable companies in the semiconductor industry and then applying a control premium. The equal weighting of the income approach and the market comparable method was then reconciled to the market approach. The market approach was calculated by multiplying the average closing share price of our common stock for the 30 days prior to the measurement date, by the number of outstanding shares of our common stock and adding a control premium that reflected the premium a hypothetical buyer might pay. The control premium was estimated using historical acquisition transactions in the semiconductor industry over the past five years. The results of the quantitative analysis performed indicated the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. As a result, we concluded there was no goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2022, February 28, 2023, or March 31, 2023. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the income approach and the market comparable method. The income approach assumes the future cash flows reflect market expectations. The market comparable method requires an estimate of a revenue market multiple and an appropriate control premium. These fair value measurements require significant judgements using Level 3 inputs, such as discounted cash flows from operations and revenue forecasts, which are not observable from the market, directly or indirectly. There is uncertainty in the projected future cash flows used in our impairment analysis, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions. If actual performance does not achieve the projections, or if the assumptions used in the analysis change in the future, we may be required to recognize impairment charges in future periods. Key assumptions in the market approach include determining a control premium. We believe our procedures for determining fair value are reasonable and consistent with current market conditions as of December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis over five to fifteen years. We review identifiable amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted cash flows resulting from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. Based on the uncertainty of forecasts, events such as the failure to generate revenue from future product launches could result in impairment in the future. We identified a potential impairment indicator for the finite lived intangible assets and performed a recoverability test by comparing the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset group to the carrying amount as of December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023. The result of the recoverability tests indicated that the sum of the expected future cash flows was greater than the carrying amount of the finite lived intangible assets. Based on the uncertainty of forecasts inherent with a new product, events such as the failure to generate forecasted revenue from the APU product could result in a non-cash impairment charge in future periods. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Please refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements appearing under Part II, Item 8 for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements that may impact the Company. 47 A n n u a l R e p o r t Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. Our revenues and expenses, except those expenses related to our operations in Israel and Taiwan, including subcontractor manufacturing expenses in Taiwan, are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, we have relatively little exposure for currency exchange risks, and foreign exchange losses have been minimal to date. We do not currently enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge exposure denominated in foreign currencies or any other derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In the future, if we believe our foreign currency exposure has increased, we may consider entering into hedging transactions to help mitigate that risk. Interest Rate Sensitivity. We had cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and long-term investments totaling $30.6 million at March 31, 2023. These amounts were invested primarily in money market funds, certificates of deposit and agency bonds. The cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities are held for working capital purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the short- term nature of these investments, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. We believe a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would not materially affect the fair value of our interest-sensitive financial instruments. Declines in interest rates, however, will reduce future investment income. 48 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (BDO USA, LLP; San Jose, CA; PCAOB ID#243) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets As of March 31, 2023 and 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 A n n u a l R e p o r t 49 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Shareholders and Board of Directors GSI Technology, Inc. Sunnyvale, California Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GSI Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at March 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Basis for Opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Critical Audit Matters The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements; and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. 50 Valuation of Inventories As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated inventory balance is stated at lower of cost or net realizable value. The valuation of inventories is adjusted by the Company when conditions indicate a decline in value due to obsolescence and is adjusted based on estimates for inventory levels in excess of forecasted demand for each specific product. We identified the valuation of inventories as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments and estimates required by management. Determining whether a decline in value has occurred requires significant judgments related to: (i) future demand for excess units on hand based on historical sales and expected future orders, and (ii) obsolescence of certain products based on changes in technology and demand. Auditing these judgments was especially challenging and involved subjective auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to address these matters. The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included: • Evaluating management's inventory valuation estimates by, (i) comparing ending inventory quantities on hand to recent and expected shipment quantities, and (ii) reviewing at-risk inventory items for potential obsolescence based on changes in shipment trends. • Challenging the reasonableness of management's assumptions related to future orders by verifying the reliability of current backlog and historical sales data, evaluating fluctuations in demand for certain product ordered by a limited number of customers, and assessing changes in technology. Valuation of Contingent Consideration As described in Notes 7 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements, on November 23, 2015, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of MikaMonu Group Ltd. (“MikaMonu”) for cash and future contingent consideration payable to former MikaMonu shareholders based on the achievement of certain milestones, including development of qualifying products and meeting certain revenue targets from the sale of those products. Since the initial measurement at the acquisition date, the liability has been re-measured to fair value at each balance sheet date. The inputs used in the valuation include the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows, the probability of achievement of the forecast, and a risk-adjusted discount rate to adjust the probability-weighted cash flows to their present value. We identified the valuation of the contingent consideration liability as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments required to estimate the fair value at the balance sheet date. Valuation of the contingent consideration liability involves management’s complex judgments related to determining: (i) the continued appropriateness of the valuation model selected, and (ii) the reasonableness of inputs and assumptions used in the valuation model, including estimated amount and timing of future cash flows, probability of achievement of the forecast, and risk-adjusted discount rate. Auditing these inputs and assumptions involved especially challenging and subjective auditor judgements due to the nature and extent of procedures performed and the specialized knowledge required to audit the valuation. The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included: • Evaluating the reasonableness of inputs used in the valuation including management’s forecast of amount and timing of future cash flows, including challenging assumptions such as the probability of achieving forecasted cash flows and examining third-party market sources and contradictory evidence from retrospective reviews of prior period forecasts. • Utilizing professionals with specialized skills and knowledge in valuation to: (i) test the appropriateness of the valuation model utilized by management to estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration; 51 A n n u a l R e p o r t (ii) verify the reasonableness of the risk-adjusted discount rate used in the model; and (iii) perform sensitivity analyses to test the effects of potential changes in the risk-adjusted discount rate based on comparable public companies and incorporating market risk to management’s revenue forecasts. /s/ BDO USA, LLP We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017. San Jose, California June 28, 2023 52 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands, except share and per share amounts) ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating lease right-of-use assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Accounts payable ($8 and $32 to a related party) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Lease liabilities, current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease liabilities, non-current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contingent consideration, non-current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,212 $ 3,363 3,471 6,415 1,414 41,875 7,423 684 — 7,978 1,790 126 59,876 $ 1,621 $ 413 5,168 7,202 12 238 1,052 8,504 36,971 6,992 4,518 4,655 1,555 54,691 7,359 889 3,345 7,978 2,023 137 76,422 1,474 537 6,850 8,861 11 361 2,738 11,971 Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) Stockholders’ equity: Preferred stock: $0.001 par value authorized: 5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: none . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — Common Stock: $0.001 par value authorized: 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 24,685,059 and 24,486,239 shares, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Retained earnings (deficit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25 55,953 (127) (4,479) 51,372 59,876 $ 24 53,083 (154) 11,498 64,451 76,422 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. A n n u a l R e p o r t 53 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands, except per share amounts) Net revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,691 $ 33,384 $ 27,729 14,512 Cost of revenues ($240, $397 and $482 to a related party) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,217 Operating expenses: 14,847 18,537 12,010 17,681 2021 2023 23,344 Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,137 Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34,481 Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21,264) Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 Interest income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (201) Other expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (21,170) Loss before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335 Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,977) $ (16,368) $ (21,505) Net loss per share: 24,672 10,218 34,890 (16,353) 71 (131) (16,413) (45) 23,550 9,938 33,488 (15,807) 308 (106) (15,605) 372 Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (0.65) $ (0.65) $ (0.67) $ (0.67) $ (0.91) (0.91) Weighted average shares used in per share calculations: Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,595 24,595 24,303 24,303 23,671 23,671 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 54 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,977) $ (16,368) $ (21,505) Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (91) Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,950) $ (16,502) $ (21,596) (134) 27 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. A n n u a l R e p o r t 55 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Accumulated Common Stock Shares Additional Paid-in Amount Capital Other Retained Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) Earnings Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity Balance, March 31, 2020. . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock under employee stock option plans . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized loss on available-for- sale investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, March 31, 2021. . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock under employee stock option plans . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized loss on available-for- sale investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, March 31, 2022. . . . . . . . . . . . Issuance of common stock under employee stock option plans . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net unrealized loss on available-for- sale investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance, March 31, 2023. . . . . . . . . . . . 23,229,286 $ 23 $ 40,176 $ 71 $ 49,371 $ 89,641 (In thousands, except share amounts) 790,990 — — 1 — — 4,692 2,854 — — — — — — (21,505) 4,693 2,854 (21,505) — 24,020,276 — 24 — 47,722 (91) (20) — 27,866 (91) 75,592 465,963 — — — — — 2,368 2,993 — — — — — — (16,368) 2,368 2,993 (16,368) — 24,486,239 — 24 — 53,083 (134) (154) — 11,498 (134) 64,451 198,820 — — 1 — — 401 2,469 — — — — — — (15,977) 402 2,469 (15,977) — — — 24,685,059 $ 25 $ 55,953 $ 27 27 — (127) $ (4,479) $ 51,372 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 56 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Cash flows from operating activities: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,977) $ (16,368) $ (21,505) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Allowance for doubtful accounts and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for excess and obsolete inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash lease expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in fair value of contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of premium on investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in assets and liabilities: (39) 402 373 (1,487) 1,004 2,993 69 (21) 226 581 (1,685) 1,015 2,469 13 35 466 598 327 1,214 2,854 88 Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash used in operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,068 (1,986) 140 (383) (2,305) (16,845) (814) (714) (70) (127) 952 (13,826) 2,630 (527) 440 383 (2,255) (15,252) Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maturities of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Purchases of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net cash provided by investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 7,000 (316) 6,684 (7,163) 12,132 (774) 4,195 (17,510) 21,000 (203) 3,287 Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock plans . . . . 4,693 Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,693 Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7,272) 51,506 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 27,212 $ 36,971 $ 44,234 Non-cash investing and financing activities: 2,368 2,368 (7,263) 44,234 402 402 (9,759) 36,971 Purchases of property and equipment through accounts payable and accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Operating lease right-of-use assets exchanged for lease obligations . . . . . . . . 564 $ 376 34 $ 585 6 658 Supplemental cash flow information: Net cash paid for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 155 $ 26 $ 858 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. A n n u a l R e p o r t 57 NOTE 1—THE COMPANY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company GSI Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in California in March 1995 and reincorporated in Delaware on June 9, 2004. The Company is a provider of high-performance semiconductor memory solutions to networking, industrial, medical, aerospace and military customers. The Company’s products are incorporated primarily in high-performance networking and telecommunications equipment, such as routers, switches, wide area network infrastructure equipment, wireless base stations and network access equipment. In addition, the Company serves the ongoing needs of the military, industrial, test equipment and medical markets for high-performance SRAMs. The Company’s in-place associative computing product is targeted for markets including computer vision, synthetic aperture radar, drug discovery, cybersecurity, and service markets such as NoSQL, Elasticsearch, and OpenSearch, which the Company plans to support with a SaaS solution. Accounting principles The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Basis of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company’s four wholly owned subsidiaries, GSI Technology Holdings, Inc., GSI Technology (BVI), Inc., GSI Technology Israel Ltd. and GSI Technology Taiwan, Inc. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates are inherent in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and include obsolete and excess inventory, the valuation of contingent consideration and the valuation of intangibles and goodwill. The uncertainty created by the disruptions in the capital markets as a result of rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment, has made such estimates more difficult and subjective. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Risk and uncertainties The decline in the global economic environment due to, among other things, rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures and significant fluctuations in energy prices has affected the business activities of the Company, its customers, suppliers, and other business partners in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. In addition, the COVID-19 global pandemic significantly impacted the global economic environment, disrupted normal business operations and had significant negative impacts on the Company’s business during the last three years. 58 The Company’s revenues have been adversely impacted by changes in customer buying patterns and communication limitations related to COVID-19 restrictions that required a significant number of its customer contacts to work from home. The Company’s results for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 demonstrated the challenges that the Company has faced during the COVID-19 global pandemic, which has restricted the activities of the Company’s sales force and distributors, reduced customer demand and caused the postponement of investment in certain customer sectors. These challenges have also impacted the Company as it entered new markets and engaged with target customers to sell its new APU product. Industry conferences and on- site training workshops, which are typically used for building a sales pipeline, were limited, due to COVID-19 related restrictions. The Company adapted its sales strategies for the COVID-19 environment, where it could not do face-to-face meetings and conduct secure meetings with government and defense customers. The Company believes that during the next 12 months disruptions in the capital markets as a result of rising interest rates, worldwide inflationary pressures, significant fluctuations in energy prices and the decline in the global economic environment could impact general economic activity and demand in the Company’s end markets. Additionally, fluctuations in customer demand due to previous buffer stock purchases during the semiconductor supply shortage may negatively impact near-term revenues. The Company buys all of its SRAM wafers, an integral component of its products, from a single supplier and is also dependent on independent suppliers to assemble and test its products. During the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, all of the wafers used in the Company’s SRAM products were supplied by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, or TSMC. If this supplier fails to satisfy the Company’s requirements on a timely basis at competitive prices, the Company could suffer manufacturing delays, a possible loss of revenues, or higher cost of revenues, any of which could adversely affect operating results. A majority of the Company’s net revenues come from sales to customers in the networking and telecommunications equipment industry. A decline in demand in this industry could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition. Because much of the manufacturing and testing of the Company’s products is conducted in Taiwan, its business performance may be affected by changes in Taiwan’s political, social and economic environment. For example, any political instability or restrictions on transportation logistics for our products that result from the relationship among the United States, Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China could damage the Company’s business. Moreover, the role of the Taiwanese government in the Taiwanese economy is significant. Taiwanese policies toward economic liberalization, and laws and policies affecting technology companies, foreign investment, currency exchange rates, taxes and other matters could change, resulting in greater restrictions on the Company’s and its suppliers' ability to do business and operate facilities in Taiwan. If any of these risks were to occur, the Company’s business could be harmed. Some of the Company’s suppliers and the Company’s two principal operations are located near fault lines. In the event of a major earthquake, typhoon or other natural disaster near the facilities of any of these suppliers or the Company, the Company’s business could be harmed. From time to time, the Company is involved in legal actions. There are many uncertainties associated with any litigation, and the Company may not prevail. If information becomes available that causes us to determine that a loss in any of the Company’s pending litigation, or the settlement of such litigation, is probable, and we can reasonably estimate the loss associated with such events, we will record the loss in accordance with GAAP. However, the actual liability in any such litigation may be materially different from the Company’s estimates, which could require us to record additional costs. A n n u a l R e p o r t 59 Revenue recognition The Company recognizes revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to its customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Under this criteria, revenue from the sale of products is generally recognized upon shipment according to the Company’s shipping terms, net of accruals for estimated variable consideration resulting from sales returns and allowances based on historical experience. When consignment warehouses purchase products from the Company for use by contract manufacturers, revenues are recognized upon delivery to the contract manufacturer. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash in demand accounts and highly liquid investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase, stated at cost, which approximates their fair value. Short-term and long-term investments All of the Company’s short-term and long-term investments are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for- sale debt securities with maturities greater than twelve months are classified as long-term investments when they are not intended for use in current operations. Investments in available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrecognized gains (losses), net of tax, as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company monitors its investments for impairment periodically and records appropriate reductions in carrying values when the declines in fair value are determined to be other-than-temporary. Concentration of credit risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash primarily in checking, certificate of deposit, and money market accounts with reputable financial institutions, and by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution or commercial issuer. The Company’s accounts receivables are derived primarily from revenue earned from customers located in the U.S. and Asia. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and, generally, requires no collateral from its customers. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. There were no write offs of accounts receivable in the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 or 2021. At March 31, 2023, three customers accounted for 36%, 25% and 19% of accounts receivable, and for the year then ended, three customers accounted for 48%, 17% and 10% of net revenues. At March 31, 2022, three customers accounted for 34%, 28% and 19% of accounts receivable, and for the year then ended, four customers accounted for 38%, 17%, 16% and 11% of net revenues. For the year ended March 31, 2021, four customers accounted for 30%, 22%, 21% and 15% of net revenues. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, cost being determined on a weighted average basis. Inventory write-down allowances are established when conditions indicate that the selling price could be less than cost due to physical deterioration, obsolescence of certain products based on changes in technology and demand, changes in price levels, or other causes. These allowances, once recorded, result in a new cost basis for the related inventory. These allowances are also considered for excess inventory generally based on inventory levels in excess of 12 months of forecasted customer demand based on historical sales and expected future orders, as 60 estimated by management, for each specific product. The allowance is not reversed until the inventory is sold or disposed. The Company recorded write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories of $226,000, $402,000 and $466,000, respectively, in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021. Property and equipment, net Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as presented below: Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Computer and other equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 to 5 years 5 to 10 years 10 to 25 years 7 years Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining lease term of the respective assets. Gains or losses on disposals of property and equipment are recorded within loss from operations. Costs of repairs and maintenance are included as part of operating expenses unless they are incurred in relation to major improvements to existing property and equipment, at which time they are capitalized. Operating Leases The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use ("ROU") assets, lease liabilities, current and lease liabilities, non-current on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company did not identify any finance leases as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an estimate of its incremental borrowing rate based on observed market data and other information available at the lease commencement date. The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and exclude lease incentives. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise such options. The Company does not record leases on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with a term of one year or less. The Company does not separate lease and non-lease components but rather accounts for each separate component as a single lease component for all underlying classes of assets. Variable lease payments are expensed as incurred and are not included within the operating lease ROU asset and lease liability calculation. Variable lease payments primarily include reimbursements of costs incurred by lessors for common area maintenance and utilities. Lease expense for minimum operating lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Impairment of long-lived assets Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their net book value may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and before interest) from the use of the assets is less than the net book value of the asset an impairment could exist and the amount of the impairment loss, if any, will generally be measured as the difference between the net book value of the assets and their estimated fair values. There were no impairment losses recognized during the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 or 2021. 61 A n n u a l R e p o r t Goodwill and intangible assets Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of February in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year and if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, on an interim basis. The Company has one reporting unit. Impairment is recognized if the carrying value of the net assets of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, with the impairment loss not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis over five to fifteen years. The Company reviews identifiable amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted cash flows resulting from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. The Company identified a potential impairment indicator for the finite lived intangible assets and performed a recoverability test by comparing the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows of the asset group to the carrying amount as of March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2022. The result of the recoverability test indicated that the sum of the expected future cash flows was greater than the carrying amount of the finite lived intangible assets. Based on the uncertainty of forecasts inherent with a new product, events such as the failure to generate forecasted revenue from the APU product could result in a non-cash impairment in future periods. Research and development Research and development expenses are related to new product designs, including, salaries, stock-based compensation, contractor fees, preproduction masks, and allocation of corporate costs and are charged to the statement of operations as incurred. Income taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Due to historical losses in the U.S., the Company has a full valuation allowance on its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company’s net deferred tax assets of $17.5 and $16.2 million, respectively, were subject to a valuation allowance of $17.5 and $16.2 million, respectively. Management continues to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. Authoritative guidance prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the Company has taken or expects to take on a tax return (including a decision whether to file or not to file a return in a particular jurisdiction). Under the guidance, the financial statements will reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing Authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts, but without considering time values. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation process, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. 62 Shipping and handling costs The Company records costs related to shipping and handling in cost of revenues. Advertising expense Advertising costs are charged to expense in the period incurred. Advertising expense was not material for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. Foreign currency transactions The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all of the Company’s foreign operations. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, resulting from transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These gains and losses were not material for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 or 2021. Segments Segment reporting is based on the “management approach,” following the method that management organizes the Company’s reportable segments for which separate financial information is made available to, and evaluated regularly by, the chief operating decision maker in allocating resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who makes the decision on allocating resources and in assessing performance. The CEO reviews the Company's consolidated results as one operating segment. In making operating decisions, the CEO primarily considers consolidated financial information, accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues by customers and product. All of the Company’s principal operations and decision-making functions are located in the U.S. The Company’s CEO views its operations, manages its business, and uses one measurement of profitability for the one operating segment, which designs, develops and sells integrated circuits. Accounting for stock-based compensation Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on options ultimately expected to vest, reduced by the amount of estimated forfeitures. The Company chose the straight-line method of allocating compensation cost over the requisite service period of the related award according to authoritative guidance. The Company calculates the expected term based on the historical average period of time that options were outstanding as adjusted for expected changes in future exercise patterns, which, for options granted in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021 resulted in an expected term of approximately 4.6 to 5.0 years, 5.0 years and 5.0 years, respectively. The Company uses its historical volatility to estimate expected volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding to the expected life of the options. The dividend yield is 0%, based on the fact that the Company has never paid dividends and has no present intention to pay dividends. Changes to these assumptions may have a significant impact on the results of operations. Authoritative guidance requires cash flows, if any, resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. A n n u a l R e p o r t 63 Comprehensive loss Comprehensive loss is defined to include all changes in stockholders’ equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. For the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, comprehensive loss was $16.0 million, $16.5 million and $21.6 million, respectively. Accounting pronouncements not yet effective for fiscal 2023 In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, loans, and other financial instruments, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. Credit losses relating to available- for-sale debt securities will also be recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted beginning April 1, 2019. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date. Implementation of this guidance on April 1, 2023 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. NOTE 2 —REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps: (1) identification of the contract with a customer; (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determination of the transaction price; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognition of revenue when, or as, we satisfy a performance obligation. The Company’s customer contracts, which may be in the form of purchase orders, contracts or purchase agreements, contain performance obligations for delivery of agreed upon products. Delivery of all performance obligations contained within a contract with a customer typically occurs at the same time (or within the same accounting period). Transfer of control occurs at the point at which delivery has occurred, title and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, and the Company has a right to payment. For all transactions apart from consignment sales, the Company will recognize revenue upon shipment of the product. For consignment sales, which are infrequent and did not occur in fiscal 2023, revenue is recognized at the time that the product is pulled from consignment warehouses. Because all of the Company’s performance obligations relate to contracts with a duration of less than one year, the Company elected to apply the optional exemption practical expedient and, therefore, is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The Company adjusts the transaction price for variable consideration. Variable consideration is not typically significant and primarily results from stock rotation rights and quick pay discounts provided to certain distributors. As a practical expedient, the Company is recognizing the incremental costs of obtaining a contract, specifically commission expenses that have a period of benefit of less than twelve months, as an expense when incurred. Additionally, the Company has adopted an accounting policy to recognize shipping costs that occur after control transfers to the customer as a fulfillment activity. 64 The Company’s contracts with customers do not typically include extended payment terms. Payment terms vary by contract type and type of customer and generally range from 30 to 60 days from shipment. Additionally, the Company has right to payment upon shipment. The Company records revenue net of sales tax, value added tax, excise tax and other taxes collected concurrent with product sales. The impact of such taxes on product sales is immaterial. The Company warrants its products to be free of defects generally for a period of three years. The Company estimates its warranty costs based on historical warranty claim experience and includes such costs in cost of revenues. Warranty costs and the accrued warranty liability were not material as of March 31, 2023 and 2022. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is derived from sales of SRAM products which represented approximately 97%, 97% and 98% of total revenues in the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Nokia, the Company’s largest customer, purchases products directly from the Company and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Based on information provided to the Company by its contract manufacturers and distributors, purchases by Nokia represented approximately 17%, 29% and 39% of the Company’s net revenues in fiscal 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See “Note 13 - Segment and Geographic Information” for revenue by shipment destination. The following table presents the Company’s revenue disaggregated by customer type. 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 Contract manufacturers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,882 $ 10,354 $ 12,127 15,172 Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430 OEMs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,691 $ 33,384 $ 27,729 22,289 741 23,023 786 NOTE 3—NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate the weighted average shares used in computing diluted net loss per share. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share: Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands, except per share amounts) Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,977) $ (16,368) $ (21,505) 2023 2021 Denominators: Weighted average shares—Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dilutive effect of employee stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dilutive effect of employee stock purchase plan options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted average shares—Dilutive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net loss per common share—Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net loss per common share—Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 24,595 — — 24,595 24,303 — — 24,303 (0.65) $ (0.65) $ (0.67) $ (0.67) $ 23,671 — — 23,671 (0.91) (0.91) A n n u a l R e p o r t 65 The following shares of common stock (determined on a weighted average basis) were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share as they had an anti-dilutive effect: Shares underlying options and ESPP shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOTE 4—BALANCE SHEET DETAIL 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 6,405 2021 4,607 8,531 Inventories: Work-in-progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,629 $ 3,085 1,555 Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,767 15 Inventory at distributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 $ 6,415 $ 4,655 March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) Accounts receivable, net: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,531 $ 4,599 (81) Less: Allowances for doubtful accounts and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,471 $ 4,518 (60) March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) Prepaid expenses and other current assets: March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) Prepaid tooling and masks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Other receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 $ 156 925 68 226 1,261 $ 1,414 $ 1,555 66 Property and equipment, net: March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) Computer and other equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,188 $ 18,415 4,425 Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,900 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,735 Building and building improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878 Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,455 (24,096) 7,423 $ 7,359 4,428 3,900 3,741 102 910 32,269 (24,846) Less: Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Depreciation expense was $782,000, $771,000 and $981,000 for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The following table summarizes the components of intangible assets and related accumulated amortization balances at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively (in thousands): As of March 31, 2023 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Intangible assets: Product designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,220 80 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,890 $ 590 $ (590) $ (2,430) (80) (3,100) $ — 1,790 — 1,790 As of March 31, 2022 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Intangible assets: Product designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,220 80 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,890 $ 590 $ (590) $ (2,197) (80) (2,867) $ — 2,023 — 2,023 Amortization of intangible assets of $233,000, $233,000 and $233,000 was included in cost of revenues for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. A n n u a l R e p o r t 67 As of March 31, 2023, the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets in the table above is as follows (in thousands): Fiscal year ending March 31, 2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2028 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 233 233 233 233 233 625 1,790 March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) Accrued expenses and other liabilities: Accrued compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,441 $ 5,524 232 Accrued commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 967 Miscellaneous accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,168 $ 6,850 214 345 1,168 On November 30, 2022, the Company announced cost reduction initiatives which included an approximate 15% reduction in the Company’s global workforce. The Company incurred $0.3 million in severance related charges during fiscal 2023 including $0.1 million recorded as cost of revenues and $0.2 million recorded as selling, general and administrative expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company expects to incur an additional $0.3 million in severance related charges during the first half of fiscal 2024. There were no severance charges accrued as of March 31, 2023 as the terms of the severance benefits have not been communicated to employees expected to be impacted. There was no accrued severance as of March 31, 2022 and there were no severance charges incurred during the year ended March 31, 2022. NOTE 5—GOODWILL Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the estimated fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. The Company tests for goodwill impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset is more likely than not impaired. The Company has one reporting unit. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment on an annual basis on the last day of February in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year. Goodwill Impairment Test The Company had a goodwill balance of $8.0 million as of both March 31, 2023 and 2022. The goodwill resulted from the acquisition of MikaMonu Group Ltd. (“MikaMonu”) in fiscal 2016. During each of the three months ended December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023, we identified sustained declines in our stock price that resulted in our market capitalization being below the carrying value of our stockholders’ equity. We concluded the sustained declines in our stock price were triggering events and proceeded with quantitative goodwill impairment assessments. The results of the quantitative goodwill impairment assessments 68 that we performed indicated the fair value of our sole reporting unit exceeded its carrying value as of December 31, 2022, February 28, 2023 and March 31, 2023. The quantitative impairment assessments performed as of December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023, utilized an equal weighting of the income approach and market comparable approach. The analysis required the comparison of the Company’s carrying value with its fair value, with an impairment recorded for any excess of carrying value over the fair value. The income approach utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit. Key assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis included, but are not limited to, a discount rate of approximately 22% to account for risk in achieving the forecast and a terminal growth rate for cash flows of 2%. The market comparable method was used to determine the fair value of the reporting unit by multiplying forecasted revenue by a market multiple. The revenue market multiple was calculated by comparing the enterprise value to revenue for comparable companies in the semiconductor industry and then applying a control premium. The equal weighting of the income approach and the market comparable method was then reconciled to the market approach. The market approach was calculated by multiplying the average closing share price of the Company’s common stock for the 30 days prior to the measurement date, by the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock and adding a control premium that reflected the premium a hypothetical buyer might pay. The control premium was estimated using historical acquisition transactions in the semiconductor industry over the past five years. The results of the quantitative analysis performed indicated the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. As a result, the Company concluded there was no goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the income approach and the market comparable method. The income approach assumes the future cash flows reflect market expectations. The market comparable method requires an estimate of a revenue market multiple and an appropriate control premium. These fair value measurements require significant judgements using Level 3 inputs, such as discounted cash flows from operations and revenue forecasts, which are not observable from the market, directly or indirectly. There is uncertainty in the projected future cash flows used in the Company’s impairment analysis, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions. If actual performance does not achieve the projections, if there is a further decline in the Company’s stock price, or if the assumptions used in the analysis change in the future, the Company may be required to recognize impairment charges in future periods. Key assumptions in the market approach include determining the control premium. The Company believes its procedures for determining fair value are reasonable and consistent with current market conditions as of March 31, 2023. A n n u a l R e p o r t 69 NOTE 6—INCOME TAXES Loss before income taxes and the provision for income taxes consists of the following: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 Loss before income taxes: U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (10,992) $ (11,132) $ (10,775) (10,395) Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (15,605) $ (16,413) $ (21,170) (5,281) (4,613) Current income tax expense (benefit): U.S. federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred income tax expense (benefit): U.S. federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ 382 1 383 (7) (4) (11) 372 $ — $ (48) 1 (47) 2 — 2 (45) $ (379) 714 (1) 334 1 — 1 335 The provision for income tax differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss as follows: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 U.S. Federal taxes at statutory rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (3,277) $ (3,447) $ (4,446) (1) State taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524 Settlement of uncertain tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (509) 2,419 Foreign tax rate differential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — GILTI tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) Tax exempt interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — Tax remeasurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) Non-deductible expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,538) 1,873 335 1 — 605 (497) 1,277 — — (220) 4 (2,277) 2,232 (3) — 463 (487) 1,350 1,262 — — 1 (691) 1,063 Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 $ (45) $ $ 70 Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities consist of the following: March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) Deferred tax assets: Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capitalized research and development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other reserves and accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred tax liabilities: 8,714 $ 7,861 5,207 4,064 — 2,106 1,171 1,119 771 551 22 10 1,384 1,073 16,416 17,637 (16,183) (17,480) 233 157 Leased assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net deferred tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (169) (169) (12) $ (244) (244) (11) The Company currently intends to indefinitely reinvest earnings in operations outside the United States. No provision has been made for state income taxes that might be payable upon remittance of such earnings, nor is it practicable to determine the amount of such potential liability. The long-term portion of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2023 and 2022 was $0 for both years, of which the timing of the resolution is uncertain. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, $3.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits had been recorded as a reduction to net deferred tax assets. It is possible, however, that some months or years may elapse before an uncertain position for which the Company has established a reserve is resolved. A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,502 $ 3,273 $ 3,321 233 Additions based on tax positions related to current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Settlements during the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (203) (78) Reductions based on tax positions related to prior years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,723 $ 3,502 $ 3,273 229 — — 221 — — There is no unrecognized tax benefit balance as of March 31, 2023 that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized after considering the valuation allowance. At March 31, 2023, due to the Company’s valuation allowance in the United States, there was no net income tax effect related to Global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) in the Company’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted. The CARES Act, along with the Consolidated Appropriations Act (“CAA”) and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) is an emergency economic stimulus package passed in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic that includes aid to small businesses in the form of loans and grants and other efforts to stabilize the U.S. economy. Also included in the CARES Act are numerous income tax provisions including changes to the net operating loss A n n u a l R e p o r t 71 rule. During fiscal year 2021, the Company recorded a $378,000 tax benefit resulting from the carryback of the Company’s fiscal year 2020 federal net operating loss to fiscal year 2018 due to the five-year net operating loss carryback provision from the March 2020 CARES Act. The Company has not filed for funding related to the CARES Act, CAA and ARPA. Management believes that within the next twelve months the Company will have no material reduction in uncertain tax benefits, including interest and penalties, as a result of the lapse of statute of limitations. The Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company's federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes are approximately $13.1 million and $22.1 million, respectively, at March 31, 2023. The Company's federal net operating loss carryforwards do not expire and the Company’s state tax net operating loss carryforwards expire beginning in 2034. The Company's federal and state tax credit carryforwards for income tax purposes are approximately $4.6 million and $5.1 million respectively, at March 31, 2023. The Company's federal tax credit carryforwards expire beginning in 2033. The Company's state tax credit carryforwards have no expiration date. Utilization of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credit carryforwards may be subject to substantial annual limitations due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. The annual limitation could result in the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards and research tax credit carryforwards before utilization. The Company has not performed an analysis to determine if a limitation applies and whether the limitation would cause the net operating losses to expire unutilized. Due to historical losses in the U.S., the Company has a full valuation allowance on its U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company’s net deferred tax assets of $17.5 million and $16.2 million, respectively, were subject to a valuation allowance of $17.5 million and $16.2 million, respectively. The net valuation allowance increased by $1.3 million and $3.2 million in fiscal 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of March 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company’s net deferred tax liabilities were $12,000 and $11,000, respectively. The deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax credits and federal and state net operating losses. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future taxable income, if any, the amount and timing of which are uncertain. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management determined that it is more likely than not that no deferred tax assets will be realized. Therefore, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets. The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions. Fiscal years 2013 through 2022 remain open to examination by the federal tax authorities and fiscal years 2012 through 2022 remain open to examination by the state of California. Fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 are subject to audit by the Israeli tax authorities. During the quarter ended June 30, 2020, the Company settled an income tax audit in Israel for fiscal years 2016 through 2019 that resulted in a discrete tax provision of $479,000 and a tax liability of $713,000 as of June 30, 2020 that was paid in the quarter ended September 30, 2020. NOTE 7—FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Fair value measurements Authoritative accounting guidance for fair value measurements provides a framework for measuring fair value and related disclosures. The guidance applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis. The guidance requires fair value measurement to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories: Level 1: Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. The fair value of available-for-sale securities included in the Level 1 category is based on quoted prices that are readily and 72 regularly available in an active market. As of March 31, 2023, the Level 1 category included money market funds of $7.8 million, which were included in cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Level 2: Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of available-for-sale securities included in the Level 2 category is based on the market values obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated using pricing models that vary by asset class and may incorporate available trade, bid and other market information and price quotes from well-established independent pricing vendors and broker-dealers. As of March 31, 2023, the Level 2 category included short-term investments of $3.4 million which were primarily comprised of certificates of deposit, supranational obligations and agency securities. There were no long-term investments as of March 31, 2023. Level 3: Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and involve management judgment and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participants and pricing. As of March 31, 2023, the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the contingent consideration liability related to the MikaMonu acquisition. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability was initially determined as of the acquisition date using unobservable inputs. These inputs include the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows, the probability of achievement of the forecast and a risk-adjusted discount rate of approximately 14.8% used to adjust the probability-weighted cash flows to their present value. Significant increases (decreases) to the estimated amount and timing of future cash flows or the probability of achievement of the forecast would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Conversely, a significant increase (decrease) in the risk-adjusted discount rate would result in a significantly (lower) higher fair value measurement. Generally, changes used in the assumptions for future cash flows and probability of achievement of the forecast would be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value measurement and expense. Conversely, changes in the risk-adjusted discount rate would be accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the related fair value measurement and expense. The continued appropriateness of the valuation model selected or any decision to change the valuation model may also lead to changes in fair value measurement. Subsequent to the acquisition date, at each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability is re-measured to fair value with changes recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the most recent re-measurement of the contingent consideration liability as of March 31, 2023, the Company used a risk-adjusted discount rate of approximately 15.2% to adjust the probability-weighted cash flows to their present value using probabilities ranging from 15% to 90% for the remaining contingent events. The contingent consideration liability is included in contingent consideration, non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2023 and 2022 in the amount of $1.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Refer to Note 14, “Acquisition” for more information. A n n u a l R e p o r t 73 The fair value of financial assets measured on a recurring basis is as follows (in thousands): Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1) Significant Observable Unobservable Significant Other Inputs (Level 3) Inputs (Level 2) March 31, 2023 Assets: Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Marketable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,796 $ 3,363 11,159 $ 7,796 — 7,796 $ $ — 3,363 3,363 $ $ — — — Liabilities: Contingent consideration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,052 $ — $ — $ 1,052 Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1) Significant Observable Unobservable Significant Other Inputs (Level 3) Inputs (Level 2) March 31, 2022 Assets: Money market funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Marketable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 16,142 $ 10,337 26,479 $ 16,142 — 16,142 $ $ — 10,337 10,337 $ $ — — — Liabilities: Contingent consideration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,738 $ — $ — $ 2,738 The following table sets forth the changes in fair value of contingent consideration for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 Contingent consideration, beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Change due to accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Re-measurement of contingent consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Contingent consideration, end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,738 $ 222 (1,908) 1,052 $ 4,225 $ 88 (1,575) 2,738 $ 3,898 98 229 4,225 Short-term and long-term investments All of the Company’s short-term and long-term investments are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for- sale debt securities with maturities greater than twelve months are classified as long-term investments when they are not intended for use in current operations. Investments in available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrecognized gains (losses), net of tax, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had money market funds of $7.8 million and $16.1 million at 74 March 31, 2023 and March 31, 2022, respectively, included in cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company monitors its investments for impairment periodically and records appropriate reductions in carrying values when the declines are determined to be other-than-temporary. The following table summarizes the Company’s available-for-sale investments: March 31, 2023 Gross Gross Cost Unrealized Unrealized Gains Losses Fair Value Short-term investments: Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,750 $ Supranational obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 654 999 Total short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,403 $ — $ — — — $ (13) $ 1,737 637 (17) 989 (10) (40) $ 3,363 (In thousands) March 31, 2022 Gross Gross Cost Unrealized Unrealized Gains Losses Fair Value (In thousands) Short-term investments: Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,000 $ Supranational obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,007 2,011 Total short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,018 $ Long-term investments: Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,750 $ Supranational obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agency bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 651 997 Total long-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,398 $ — $ — — — $ (11) $ 3,989 1,000 (7) (8) 2,003 (26) $ 6,992 — $ — — — $ (18) $ 1,732 (17) 634 979 (18) (53) $ 3,345 The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position as of March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Less Than 12 Months Fair Value Unrealized Loss March 31, 2023 12 Months or Greater Total Fair Value Unrealized Loss Fair Value Unrealized Loss (In thousands) Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . $ Agency bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supranational obligations . . . . . . $ — $ — — — $ — $ — — — $ 1,737 $ 990 636 3,363 $ (13) $ (10) (17) (40) $ 1,737 $ 990 636 3,363 $ (13) (10) (17) (40) A n n u a l R e p o r t 75 Less Than 12 Months Fair Value Unrealized Loss March 31, 2022 12 Months or Greater Total Fair Value Unrealized Loss Fair Value Unrealized Loss (In thousands) Certificates of deposit . . . . . . . . . $ Agency bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supranational obligations . . . . . . $ 4,974 $ 2,982 1,634 9,590 $ (26) $ (26) (24) (76) $ 246 $ — — 246 $ (3) $ — — (3) $ 5,220 $ 2,982 1,634 9,836 $ (29) (26) (24) (79) The Company’s investment portfolio consists of both corporate and governmental securities that have a maximum maturity of three years. All unrealized gains and losses are due to changes in interest rates and bond yields. Subject to normal credit risks, the Company has the ability to realize the full value of all these investments upon maturity. At March 31, 2023 and 2022, the deferred tax asset related to unrecognized gains and losses on short-term and long-term investments was $10,000 and $22,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2023, contractual maturities of the Company’s available-for-sale investments were as follows: Cost Fair Value (In thousands) Maturing within one year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,403 $ 3,363 — Maturing in one to three years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — $ 3,403 $ 3,363 NOTE 8—LEASES The Company has operating leases for corporate offices, and research and development facilities. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of 5 months to 49 months, some of which include options to extend for up to 5 years. Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows: As of As of March 31, 2023 March 31, 2022 (In thousands) Operating Leases Operating lease right-of-use assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Lease liabilities-current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Lease liabilities-non-current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total operating lease liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 684 $ 413 $ 238 651 $ 889 537 361 898 76 The following table provides the details of lease costs: Operating lease cost (fixed) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Short-term lease cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ The following table provides other information related to leases: Year Ended March 31, 2022 2023 (In thousands) 592 $ 31 623 $ 429 254 683 Year Ended March 31, 2022 2023 (In thousands) Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows from operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 589 $ 436 Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 376 $ 585 Weighted-average remaining lease term (years): Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.42 1.70 Weighted-average discount rate: Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.37% 4.25% The following table provides the maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of March 31, 2023: Operating Lease Liabilities (In thousands) Fiscal Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2024 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2026 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2028 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total undiscounted future cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less: Imputed interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Present value of undiscounted future cash flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Presentation on statement of financial position Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Non-current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 420 84 86 89 7 686 (35) 651 413 238 A n n u a l R e p o r t 77 NOTE 9—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Royalty obligations The Company has license agreements that require it to pay royalties on the sale of products using the licensed technology. Royalty expense for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $39,000, $32,000 and $35,000, respectively, and was included within cost of revenues. Indemnification obligations The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise in the context of contracts entered into by the Company, under which the Company customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold and certain intellectual property rights. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract, which procedures typically allow the Company to challenge the other party’s claims. Further, the Company’s obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and in some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by it under these agreements. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under these or similar agreements due to the conditional nature of the Company’s obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the Company under these agreements have not had a material effect on its business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. The Company believes that if it were to incur a loss in any of these matters, such loss should not have a material effect on its business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. Product warranties The Company warrants its products to be free of defects generally for a period of three years. The Company estimates its warranty costs based on historical warranty claim experience and includes such costs in cost of revenues. Warranty costs and the accrued warranty liability were not material as of March 31, 2023 and 2022 and for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 or 2021. NOTE 10—COMMON STOCK The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes the Company to issue 150,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. The Company’s board of directors has authorized the repurchase, at management’s discretion, of shares of its common stock. Under the repurchase program, the Company may repurchase shares from time to time on the open market or in private transactions. The specific timing and amount of the repurchases will be dependent on market conditions, securities law limitations and other factors. The repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice. Through March 31, 2023, including the shares purchased in a modified “Dutch Auction” self-tender offer, the Company has repurchased and retired a total of 12,004,779 shares at an average cost of $5.06 per share for a total cost of $60.7 million. At March 31, 2023, management was authorized to repurchase additional shares with a value of up to $4.3 million under the repurchase program. 78 NOTE 11—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan In January 2007, the Company’s board of directors approved the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, (the “2007 Plan”), which was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders in March 2007. A total of 3,000,000 shares of common stock were authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan. This reserve automatically increased on April 1 of each year through 2017 by an amount equal to the smaller of (a) five percent of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on the immediately preceding March 31, or (b) a lesser amount determined by the board of directors. As described below, the 2007 Plan was terminated in August 2016 and no further awards may be granted pursuant to the 2007 Plan. In the event of a stock split or other change in the Company’s capital structure, appropriate adjustments will be made in the number of outstanding awards to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights. Awards could be granted under the 2007 Plan to the Company’s employees, including officers, directors, or consultants or those of any present or future parent or subsidiary corporation or other affiliated entity. Options granted to non-officer employees generally vest at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary and subsequent anniversaries of the date of grant, while grants to officers vest in full four years after the anniversary date of the officer’s employment that is closest to the date of grant. In the event of a change in control as described in the 2007 Plan, the acquiring or successor entity may assume or continue all or any awards outstanding under the 2007 Plan or substitute substantially equivalent awards. Any awards which are not assumed or continued in connection with a change in control or exercised or settled prior to the change in control will terminate effective as of the time of the change in control. The administrator may provide for the acceleration of vesting of any or all outstanding awards upon such terms and to such extent as it determines, except that the vesting of all nonemployee director awards will automatically be accelerated in full. The 2007 Plan also authorizes the administrator, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, to cancel each or any outstanding award denominated in shares upon a change in control in exchange for a payment to the participant with respect to each vested share subject to the cancelled award of an amount equal to the excess of the consideration to be paid per share of common stock in the change in control transaction over the exercise price per share, if any, under the award. The 2016 Equity Incentive Plan In June 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, (the “2016 Plan”), which was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders in August 2016. In connection with the stockholders’ approval of the 2016 Plan, 6,000,000 shares available for future award under the 2007 Plan were transferred to the 2016 Plan, 705,699 shares available for grant under the 2007 plan were canceled and the 2007 Plan was terminated. The Company granted options under the 2007 Plan until August 2016, and the 2007 Plan continues to govern the terms of options that remain outstanding under the 2007 Plan. In July 2021, the Company’s board of directors approved the amendment and restatement of the 2016 Plan, which was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders in August 2021. The following summary highlights the material changes to the 2016 Plan: • The number of shares available for issuance was increased by 4,000,000 shares; • The sum of the aggregate grant date fair value of all equity awards and cash compensation for services as a director that may be provided to any non-employee director in any fiscal year was limited to $300,000, reflecting an amendment to a provision of the 2016 Plan that applies a limit of $150,000 to the grant of equity awards alone in any fiscal year; and A n n u a l R e p o r t 79 • The period during which new awards may be granted under the 2016 Plan was extended to August 25, 2031. Appropriate and proportionate adjustments will be made to the number of shares authorized and other numerical limits in the 2016 Plan and to outstanding awards in the event of any change in the Company’s common stock through merger, consolidation, reorganization, reincorporation, recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, split-up, split-off, spin-off, combination of shares, exchange of shares or similar change in the Company’s capital structure, or if the Company makes a distribution to its stockholders in a form other than common stock (excluding regular and periodic cash dividends) that has a material effect on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock. In such circumstances, the administrator also has the discretion under the 2016 Plan to adjust other terms of outstanding awards as it deems appropriate. If any award granted under the 2016 Plan expires or otherwise terminates for any reason without having been exercised or settled in full, or if shares subject to forfeiture or repurchase are forfeited or repurchased by the Company for not more than the participant's purchase price, any such shares reacquired or subject to a terminated award will again become available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. Shares will not be treated as having been issued under the 2016 Plan and will therefore not reduce the number of shares available for issuance to the extent an award is settled in cash or to the extent that shares are withheld or reacquired by the Company in satisfaction of a tax withholding obligation. Upon the exercise of a stock appreciation right, tender of shares in payment of an option's exercise price or net-exercise of an option, the number of shares available under the 2016 Plan will be reduced by number of shares actually issued in settlement of the award. To enable compensation provided in connection with certain types of awards intended to qualify as “performance-based” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the 2016 Plan establishes limits on the maximum aggregate number of shares or dollar value for which awards may be granted to an employee in any fiscal year, as follows: • No more than 300,000 shares subject to stock options and stock appreciation rights. • No more than 100,000 shares subject to restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards. • For each full fiscal year of the Company contained in the performance period of performance shares or performance unit awards, no more than 50,000 shares subject to performance share awards or more than $500,000 subject to performance unit awards. • For each full fiscal year of the Company contained in the performance period of cash-based or other stock-based awards, no more than $500,000 subject to cash-based awards or more than 50,000 shares subject to other stock-based awards. Awards may be granted under the 2016 Plan to the Company’s employees, including officers, directors and consultants or those of any present or future parent or subsidiary corporation or other affiliated entity of the Company. To date, options granted to non-officer employees generally vest 25% on the first anniversary and subsequent anniversaries of the date of grant, while grants to officers generally vest in full four years after the anniversary date of the officer’s employment that is closest to the date of grant. While the Company may grant incentive stock options only to employees, the Company may grant nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and stock units, performance shares and units, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards to any eligible participant. Non-employee director awards may be granted only to members of the Company’s board of directors who, at the time of grant, are not employees. 80 Only members of the board of directors who are not employees at the time of grant are eligible to participate in the nonemployee director awards component of the 2016 Plan. The board or the compensation committee shall set the amount and type of nonemployee director awards to be awarded on a periodic, non-discriminatory basis. Nonemployee director awards may be granted in the form of NSOs, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards. Subject to adjustment for changes in the Company's capital structure, no nonemployee director may be awarded, in any fiscal year, one or more nonemployee director awards for more than a number of shares determined by dividing $150,000 by the fair market value of a share of the Company’s stock determined on the last trading day immediately preceding the date on which the applicable nonemployee award is granted. The 2016 Plan provides that, without the approval of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at a meeting of the Company’s stockholders, the administrator may not provide for any of the following with respect to underwater options or stock appreciation rights: (1) either the cancellation of such outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for the grant of new options or stock appreciation rights at a lower exercise price or the amendment of outstanding options or stock appreciation rights to reduce the exercise price, (2) the issuance of new full value awards in exchange for the cancellation of such outstanding options or stock appreciation rights, or (3) the cancellation of such outstanding options or stock appreciation rights in exchange for payments in cash. In the event of a change in control as described in the 2016 Plan, the surviving, continuing, successor or purchasing entity or its parent may, without the consent of any participant, either assume or continue outstanding awards or substitute substantially equivalent awards for its stock. If so determined by the Committee, stock-based awards will be deemed assumed if, for each share subject to the award prior to the change in control, its holder is given the right to receive the same amount of consideration that a stockholder would receive as a result of the change in control. Any awards which are not assumed or continued in connection with a change in control or exercised or settled prior to the change in control will terminate effective as of the time of the Change in Control. The administrator may provide for the acceleration of vesting or settlement of any or all outstanding awards upon such terms and to such extent as it determines, except that the vesting of all nonemployee director awards will automatically be accelerated in full. The 2016 Plan also authorizes the administrator, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, to cancel each or any outstanding award denominated in shares of stock upon a change in control in exchange for a payment to the participant with respect to each vested share (and each unvested share if so determined by the administrator) subject to the cancelled award of an amount equal to the excess of the consideration to be paid per share of common stock in the change in control transaction over the exercise or purchase price per share, if any, under the award. The 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan In January 2007, the board of directors approved the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2007 Purchase Plan”) which was subsequently approved by the Company’s stockholders in March 2007. A total of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock was authorized and reserved for sale under the 2007 Purchase Plan. In addition, the 2007 Purchase Plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the number of shares available for issuance under the plan on April 1 of each year beginning in 2008 and continuing through and including April 1, 2017 equal to the lesser of (1) one percent of the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the immediately preceding March 31, (2) 250,000 shares or (3) a number of shares as the board of directors may determine. Appropriate adjustments will be made in the number of authorized shares and in outstanding purchase rights to prevent dilution or enlargement of participants' rights in the event of a stock split or other change in our capital structure. Shares subject to purchase rights that expire or are canceled will again become available for issuance under the 2007 Purchase Plan. The Company’s employees and employees of any parent or subsidiary corporation designated by the administrator will be eligible to participate in the 2007 Purchase Plan if they are customarily employed by us for A n n u a l R e p o r t 81 more than 20 hours per week and more than five months in any calendar year. However, an employee may not be granted a right to purchase stock under the 2007 Purchase Plan if: (1) the employee immediately after such grant would own stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of our capital stock or of any parent or subsidiary corporation, or (2) the employee’s rights to purchase stock under all of our employee stock purchase plans would accrue at a rate that exceeds $25,000 in value for each calendar year of participation in such plans. The 2007 Purchase Plan is designed to be implemented through a series of sequential offering periods, generally six (6) months in duration beginning on the first trading day on or after May 1 and November 1 of each year. The administrator is authorized to establish additional or alternative sequential or overlapping offering periods and offering periods having a different duration or different starting or ending dates, provided that no offering period may have a duration exceeding 27 months. Amounts accumulated for each participant under the 2007 Purchase Plan are used to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at the end of each offering period at a price generally equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of our common stock at the beginning of an offering period or at the end of the offering period. Prior to commencement of an offering period, the administrator is authorized to reduce, but not increase, this purchase price discount for that offering period, or, under circumstances described in the 2007 Purchase Plan, during that offering period. The maximum number of shares a participant may purchase in any six-month offering period is the lesser of (i) that number of shares determined by multiplying (x) 1,000 shares by (y) the number of months (rounded to the nearest whole month) in the offering period and rounding to the nearest whole share or (ii) that number of whole shares determined by dividing (x) the product of $2,083.33 and the number of months (rounded to the nearest whole month) in the offering period and rounding to the nearest whole dollar by (y) the fair market value of a share of our common stock at the beginning of the offering period. Prior to the beginning of any offering period, the administrator may alter the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by any participant during the offering period or specify a maximum aggregate number of shares that may be purchased by all participants in the offering period. If insufficient shares remain available under the plan to permit all participants to purchase the number of shares to which they would otherwise be entitled, the administrator will make a pro rata allocation of the available shares. Any amounts withheld from participants' compensation in excess of the amounts used to purchase shares will be refunded, without interest. During fiscal 2023, 198,820 shares of common stock were issued under the 2007 Purchase Plan. In the event of a change in control, an acquiring or successor corporation may assume our rights and obligations under the 2007 Purchase Plan. If the acquiring or successor corporation does not assume such rights and obligations, then the purchase date of the offering periods then in progress will be accelerated to a date prior to the change in control. 82 The following table summarizes stock option activities: Balance at March 31, 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at March 31, 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options reserved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at March 31, 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at March 31, 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options vested and exercisable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Options vested and expected to vest . . . . . . . . . . Shares Available for Grant 2,522,314 (1,285,252) — 94,500 1,331,562 4,000,000 (1,280,761) — 484,862 4,535,663 (1,535,647) — 594,835 3,594,851 Number of Shares Underlying Options Outstanding Weighted Average Weighted Remaining Average Contractual Exercise Life (Years) Price Intrinsic Value 8,135,791 1,285,252 (667,503) (320,663) 8,432,877 — 1,280,761 (316,784) (806,179) 8,590,675 1,535,647 — (1,317,162) 8,809,160 5,470,684 8,628,329 $ 6.17 $ 6.46 $ 5.99 $ 961,633 $ 7.84 $ 6.17 $ — $ 5.43 $ 5.12 $ 149,937 $ 6.45 $ 6.07 $ 3.01 $ $ 5.50 5.52 $ 5.62 3.77 $ 6.01 $ 5.44 $ 5.64 $ — — — $ — The options outstanding and by exercise price at March 31, 2023 are as follows: Number of Shares Underlying Options Exercise Price Outstanding Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Number Vested and Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price - - - - - - - - 3.40 4.42 4.99 5.58 5.83 6.70 7.40 8.00 $ 1.87 $ 3.60 $ 4.68 $ 5.13 $ 5.69 $ 5.91 $ 6.86 $ 7.46 $ 8.09 $ 8.30 1,069,082 $ 913,408 $ 1,081,111 $ 1,346,631 $ 953,077 $ 1,182,559 $ 935,148 $ 698,791 $ 77,260 $ 552,093 $ 8,809,160 $ 2.52 4.12 4.97 5.42 5.80 6.42 7.10 7.74 8.09 8.30 5.62 7.84 8.41 2.84 5.32 5.46 4.70 3.19 6.65 4.22 6.33 5.52 299,414 $ 161,432 $ 1,081,111 $ 735,451 $ 411,522 $ 1,118,669 $ 935,148 $ 536,608 $ 77,260 $ 114,069 $ 5,470,684 $ 3.40 4.06 4.97 5.30 5.77 6.44 7.10 7.75 8.09 8.30 6.01 A n n u a l R e p o r t 83 Stock-based compensation The Company recognized $2.5 million, $3.0 million and $2.9 million of stock-based compensation expense for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as follows: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 346 Cost of revenues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,509 Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 999 Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,469 $ 2,993 $ 2,854 1,316 951 1,676 1,069 202 $ 248 $ Stock-based compensation expense in the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 included $211,000, $260,000 and $276,000, respectively, related to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan. No tax benefit was recognized in either fiscal 2023 or fiscal 2022 due to a full valuation allowance. There were no windfall tax benefits realized from exercised stock options recognized in fiscal 2023 or fiscal 2022. Compensation cost capitalized within inventory at March 31, 2023 and 2022 was not material. As of March 31, 2023, the Company’s total unrecognized compensation cost was $4.4 million, which will be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.74 years. The Company calculated the fair value of stock-based awards in the periods presented using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 2021 Stock Option Plans: Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.95 - 4.27 % 0.66 Expected life (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.55 - 5.00 Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49.2 - 53.1 % 47.7 Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employee Stock Purchase Plan: Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.54 - 4.54 % 0.04 Expected life (in years) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49.3 - 58.2 % 45.6 Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — % — % 0.50 - 1.62 % 0.22 - 0.42 % 5.00 - 49.1 % 41.9 - 47.6 % — % — % 5.00 - 0.07 % 0.12 - 0.15 % 0.50 - 57.4 % 67.1 - 68.6 % — % — % 0.50 The weighted average fair value of options granted during the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $1.38, $2.29 and $2.55, respectively. NOTE 12—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION The Company incurred non-recurring engineering service expense and manufacturing services of approximately $240,000, $397,000 and $482,000 during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, from Wistron Neweb Corp (“WNC”) in connection with the manufacturing of single-APU PCIe boards, to be used in the Company’s in-place associative computing product. Haydn Hsieh, a member of the Company’s board of directors, is the Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer of WNC. The amount owed to WNC, of $8,000 and $32,000 at March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, is included in accounts payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 84 NOTE 13—SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Based on its operating management and financial reporting structure, the Company has determined that it has one reportable business segment: the design, development and sale of integrated circuits. The following is a summary of net revenues by geographic area based on the location to which product is shipped: 2023 Year Ended March 31, 2022 (In thousands) 2021 United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,435 $ 15,517 $ 12,375 2,454 China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,074 Singapore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,555 Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,395 Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 Rest of the world . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,691 $ 33,384 $ 27,729 2,108 5,731 5,172 3,471 1,385 1,582 4,941 3,087 4,474 1,172 All sales are denominated in United States dollars. The locations and net book value of long-lived assets and operating lease right-of-use assets are as follows: United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Taiwan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Israel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ NOTE 14—ACQUISITION March 31, 2023 2022 (In thousands) 7,453 $ 7,027 407 814 8,107 $ 8,248 177 477 On November 23, 2015, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of privately held MikaMonu Group Ltd. (“MikaMonu”), a development-stage, Israel-based company that specialized in in-place associative computing for markets including big data, computer vision and cyber security. MikaMonu, located in Tel Aviv, held 12 United States patents and had a number of pending patent applications. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase under authoritative guidance for business combinations. The purchase price of the acquisition was allocated to the intangible assets acquired, with the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired recorded as goodwill. The Company performs a goodwill impairment test in February of each fiscal year and if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, on an interim basis. Consideration Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company paid the former MikaMonu shareholders initial cash consideration of approximately $4.9 million. The Company is also required to pay the former MikaMonu shareholders future contingent consideration consisting of retention payments and “earnout” payments, as described below. A n n u a l R e p o r t 85 The Company made cash retention payments of $2.5 million to the three former MikaMonu shareholders in installments over a four-year period, that were conditioned on the continued employment of Dr. Avidan Akerib, MikaMonu’s co-founder and chief technologist. The retention amount of $2.5 million was deposited in escrow. Of this amount, $743,000, $750,000 and $1.0 million was paid to the former MikaMonu shareholders during the quarters ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The Company is not required to make any further retention payments. The Company will also make “earnout” payments to the former MikaMonu shareholders in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock, at the Company’s discretion, during a period of up to ten years following the closing if certain product development milestones and revenue targets for products based on the MikaMonu technology are achieved. Earnout amounts of $750,000 were paid in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 based on the achievement of certain product development milestones. Additional payments, up to a maximum of $30.0 million, equal to 5% of net revenues from the sale of qualifying products in excess of certain thresholds, will be made quarterly through December 31, 2025. The portion of the retention payment contingently payable to Dr. Akerib (approximately $1.2 million) was recorded as compensation expense over the period that his services were provided to the Company. The portion of the retention payment made to the other former MikaMonu shareholders (approximately $1.3 million) plus the maximum amount of the potential earnout payments as of March 31, 2023 totals approximately $32.0 million. The Company determined that the fair value of this contingent consideration liability was $5.8 million at the acquisition date. The contingent consideration liability is included in contingent consideration, non-current on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2023 and 2022 in the amount of $1.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively. At each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability is re-measured to fair value with changes recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Re- measurement of the contingent consideration liability resulted in an increase (reduction) in fair value for the years ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 of ($1.9 million), ($1.6 million) and $229,000, respectively. See Note 7 for the valuation of contingent consideration. NOTE 15—EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS The Company provides a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”), which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Retirement Plan covers essentially all United States employees. Eligible employees may make contributions to the Retirement Plan up to 15% of their annual compensation, but no greater than the annual IRS limitation for any plan year. The Retirement Plan does not provide for Company contributions. The Company provides a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Taiwan Pension Plan”) that covers essentially all of its employees located in Taiwan. The Company makes contributions to the Taiwan Pension Plan equal to 6% of eligible compensation and employees can make voluntary contributions of up to 6% of eligible compensation. All contributions are fully vested. The Company provides a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Pension Plan”) that covers essentially all of its employees located in Israel. Eligible employees may make contributions to the Pension Plan up to 6% of eligible compensation, and the Company contributes up to 15.83% of eligible compensation. All contributions are fully vested. 86 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2023, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, solely as a result of the material weakness in the Company's internal control over financial reporting, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The material weakness resulted in a significant adjustment to the fair value of the contingent consideration liability in the current period. Management corrected this misstatement prior to issuance of the financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023. Additionally, management has performed an analysis to ensure no other material errors resulted from this control failure. Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management conducted an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of March 31, 2023, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. During its review, management determined that the material weakness, which was identified in the course of preparing our financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, remained un-remediated at March 31, 2023. Specifically, management concluded that it did not design and maintain adequate controls over the review of forecasts and the probability of achievement of the forecast used to calculate the contingent consideration liability, used in the goodwill impairment test and used in the recoverability test over intangible assets. Because we are a non-accelerated filer, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to attest to or issue a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. A n n u a l R e p o r t 87 Remediation Plans for Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting We are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment. In response to the identified material weakness above, we, with the oversight of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, will take comprehensive actions to remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. We will re-evaluate the process and procedures involved in developing forecasts used for the calculation of the contingent consideration liability, used in the goodwill impairment test and used in the recoverability test for intangible assets. The remediation efforts are intended both to address the identified material weakness, and to enhance our overall financial control environment. We continue to evaluate and work to improve our controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Until this material weakness is remediated, we plan to continue to perform additional analyses and other procedures to ensure our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Except for our identification and assessment of the material weakness described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within GSI Technology, Inc. have been detected. Item 9B. Other Information Not applicable. Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections Not applicable. 88 PART III The SEC allows us to include information required in this report by referring to other documents or reports we have already filed or will soon be filing. This is called “incorporation by reference.” We intend to file our definitive proxy statement for our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, and certain information therein is incorporated in this report by reference. Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance The information required by this item with respect to executive officers is set forth in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the remaining information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance” to be included in the Proxy Statement. Item 11. Executive Compensation The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Executive Compensation” to be included in the Proxy Statement. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Principal Stockholders and Stock Ownership by Management” and “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information” to be included in the Proxy Statement. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Related Person Transactions” and “Corporate Governance—Director Independence” to be included in the Proxy Statement. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Proposal No. 2 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” to be included in the Proxy Statement. A n n u a l R e p o r t 89 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules PART IV (a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form: 1. Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets As of March 31, 2023 and 2022 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Three Years Ended March 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 50 53 54 55 56 57 58 2. Financial Statement Schedules Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable, is not required or is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto. 90 3. Exhibits: The following exhibits are filed herewith: Exhibit Number 3.1 3.2 4.1 10.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 26, 2022) Name of Document Bylaws of Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 25, 2022) Description of Registrant's securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and Registrant’s directors and officers (Incorporated by reference to identically-numbered exhibit to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-139885) filed on January 10, 2007) 10.2 (1) 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement filed on July 21,2011) 10.3 (1) 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and form of Subscription Agreement (Incorporated by reference to identically-numbered exhibit to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-139885) filed on February 16, 2007) 10.4 (1) Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option (U.S. Participant) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2007) 10.5 (1) Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option (Non-U.S. Participant) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2007) 10.6 (1) Form of Stock Option Agreement (U.S. Participant) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2007) 10.7 (1) Form of Stock Option Agreement (Non-U.S. Participant) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2007) 10.8 Intellectual Property Agreement dated August 28, 2009 between GSI Technology, Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2009) 10.9 (2) Master Purchase Agreement dated August 31, 2011 between Registrant and Cisco Systems, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q filed on November 4, 2011) 10.10 (2) Master Purchase Agreement dated August 31, 2011 between Registrant and Cisco Systems International B.V. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10 - Q filed on November 4, 2011) 10.11 Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 23, 2015 among GSI Technology, Inc., GSI Technology Holdings, Inc. and MikaMonu Group Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 4, 2016) 10.12 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on September 2, 2016) A n n u a l R e p o r t 91 10.13 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on August 26, 2021) 10.14 (1) Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option (U.S. Participant) under 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2016) 10.15 (1) Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Option (Non-U.S. Participant) under 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2016) 10.16 (1) Form of Stock Option Agreement (U.S. Participant) under 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2016) 10.17 (1) Form of Stock Option Agreement (Non-U.S. Participant) under 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2016) 10.18 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. Executive Retention and Severance Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2014) 10.19 10.20 10.21 (1) First Amendment to the GSI Technology, Inc. Executive Retention and Severance Plan dated August 29. 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2018) (1) Second Amendment to the GSI Technology, Inc. Executive Retention and Severance Plan dated August 27. 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 28, 2020) Factory Lease Agreement for No. 1, 6th Floor, 30 Tai-Yuan Street, Chu-Pei City, Taiwan dated August 31, 2017 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2017) 10.22 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. 2021 Variable Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2020) 10.23 Factory Lease Agreement for No. 1, 6th Floor, 30 Tai-Yuan Street, Chu-Pei City, Taiwan dated August 13, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2020) 10.24 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. 2022 Variable Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 4, 2021) 10.25 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. 2023 Variable Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2022) 10.26 (1) GSI Technology, Inc. 2024 Variable Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2023) 21.1 23.1 24.1 31.1 31.2 List of Subsidiaries Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – BDO USA, LLP Power of Attorney (Incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) Certification of Lee-Lean Shu, President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of Douglas Schirle, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 92 32.1 Certification of Lee-Lean Shu, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Douglas Schirle, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document 101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document 101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document 101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document 101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL documents) (1) Compensatory plan or management contract. (2) This exhibit has been filed separately with the Commission pursuant to an application for confidential treatment which has been granted by the Commission. The confidential portions of this exhibit have been omitted and marked by asterisks. Item 16. Form 10-K Summary Not applicable. A n n u a l R e p o r t 93 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. June 28, 2023 GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC. By: /s/ DOUGLAS M. SCHIRLE Douglas M. Schirle Chief Financial Officer 94 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Lee-Lean Shu and Robert Yau, jointly and severally, his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10- K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Name Title Date /s/ LEE-LEAN SHU Lee-Lean Shu President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman June 28, 2023 (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ DOUGLAS M. SCHIRLE Douglas M. Schirle Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) June 28, 2023 /s/ ROBERT YAU Robert Yau /s/ JACK A. BRADLEY Jack A. Bradley /s/ ELIZABETH CHOLAWSKY Elizabeth Cholawsky /s/ HAYDN HSIEH Haydn Hsieh /s/ RUEY L. LU Ruey L. Lu /s/ BARBARA NELSON Barbara Nelson Vice President, Engineering, Secretary and Director Director Director Director Director Director 95 June 28, 2023 June 28, 2023 June 28, 2023 June 28, 2023 June 28, 2023 June 28, 2023 A n n u a l R e p o r t (This page has been left blank intentionally.) Board of Directors Executive Officers Lee-Lean Shu Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer GSI Technology, Inc. Jack A. Bradley Partner, David Powell Financial Services Elizabeth Cholawsky Chief Executive Officer HG Insights Inc. Haydn Hsieh Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer Wistron NeWeb Corporation Ruey L. Lu President EMPIA Technology Barbara Nelson Former Vice President of Western Digital Corporation Robert Yau Vice President, Engineering GSI Technology, Inc. Lee-Lean Shu President and Chief Executive Officer Didier Lasserre Vice President, Sales Douglas Schirle Chief Financial Officer Bor-Tay Wu Vice President, Taiwan Operations Ping Wu Vice President, U.S. Operations Robert Yau Vice President, Engineering Avidan Akerib Vice President, Associative Computing Annual Meeting of Stockholders The annual meeting of stockholders will be held on Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. PDT, virtually via audio webcast at https://meetnow.global/ MQV6UG2 Corporate Offices GSI Technology, Inc. 1213 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, California 94089 408-331-8800 http://www.gsitechnology.com General Counsel DLA Piper LLP (US) East Palo Alto, California Investor Relations Hayden IR Scottsdale, Arizona 646-536-7331 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm BDO USA, LLP San Jose, California Transfer Agent and Stock Registrar First Class/Registered/Certified Mail: Computershare P.O. Box 505000 Louisville, KY 40233 Courier Services: Computershare 462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600 Louisville, KY 40202 Shareholder Services Number: 800-368-5948 Investor Centre™ portal: www.computershare.com/investor Additional Information Additional copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, can be obtained, free of charge, on our Web site or upon written request by mail or e-mail to our corporate offices, Attention Investor Relations, at the address indicated above. www.gsitechnology.com Corporate Office 1213 Elko Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (cid:23)08-(cid:22)(cid:22)(cid:20)-8(cid:27)(cid:19)(cid:19)
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above