Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Agricultural Inputs / Highfield Resources Ltd

Highfield Resources Ltd

hfr · ASX Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker hfr
Exchange ASX
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Agricultural Inputs
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Highfield Resources Ltd
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Annual Report
31 December 2017

highfieldresources.com.au

ABN 51 153 918 257

Contents 

Page

Corporate Directory 

Chairman’s Letter 

Chief Executive Officer’s Letter 

Sustainability Report 

Directors’ Report 

Financial Report  

Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and 

Other Comprehensive Income 

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 

Directors’ Declaration 

Auditor’s Independence Declaration 

Independent Auditor’s Report 

ASX Additional Information 

1

3

5

6

18

48

50

51

52

53

54

75

77

78

82

Corporate Directory 

Directors

Mr. Derek Carter (Non-Executive Chairman)

Mr. Peter Albert (Managing Director & CEO)

Ms. Pauline Carr (Non-Executive Director)

Mr. Richard Crookes (Non-Executive Director)

Mr. Jim Dietz (Non-Executive Director)

Mr. Owen Hegarty (Non-Executive Director)

Company Secretary

Mr. Donald Stephens

Registered Office & Principal Place of Business

169 Fullarton Road

DULWICH, SA 5065

Telephone: 

+61 8 8133 5000

Facsimile: 

+61 8 8431 3502

Website:  

highfieldresources.com.au

Share Registry

Advanced Share Registry Pty Ltd

110 Stirling Highway

NEDLANDS, WA 6009

Telephone:  

+61 8 9389 8033

Facsimile:  

+61 8 9389 7871

Auditor

HLB Mann Judd

Level 4, 130 Stirling Street

PERTH, WA 6000

Telephone:  

+61 8 9227 7500

Facsimile:  

+61 8 9227 7533

Stock Exchange

Australian Securities Exchange 

(Home Exchange: Perth, Western Australia)

ASX Code: HFR

1

2

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersChairman’s 
Letter

Dear Shareholders

As a result of changing our reporting period end from June to 
December,  it  is  only  a  short  six  months  since  my  last  letter 
to  you. These  six  months  have  seen  intense  activity  by  the 
Company, especially in the area of our environmental permit 
application. Most of the work required by the Company was 
completed  prior  to  the  period  end,  although  two  reports 
remained  to  be  submitted  to  the  authorities  in  Madrid  by 
interested parties, both of which have now been submitted. 

The  quality  of  technical  work  and  the  relationships  that 
have  been  established  with  all  authorities  over  the  past  18 
months  as  well  as  the  positive  feedback  received,  reinforce 
the  Company’s  confidence  that  a  positive  environmental 
declaration will be issued by the authorities. Once we receive 
the environmental permit, we will be in a position to secure 
the  mining  concession  and  necessary  construction  permits 
and whilst these will likely take several months, we anticipate 
that the process will be relatively straightforward.

Potash prices have continued their slow but steady recovery 
with prices typically up by US$20-30/tonne during 2017. Also, 
most  forecasts  predict  further  steady  rises  in  2018.  This 
continued  improvement  reaffirms  our  confidence  about  the 
medium  and  long  term  outlook  for  the  commodity,  and  we 
remain committed to developing the remarkable Muga project 
into  a  business  which  will  operate  profitably  in  any  market 
environment.

I  would  like  to  thank  my  fellow  board  members,  the 
management team and all of our employees for their efforts 
during  the  past  six  months.  Moreover,  I  would  like  to  thank 
all of our shareholders for their continued support and I look 
forward to a successful next year.

Derek Carter

23 March 2018

3

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders4

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersChief Executive 
Officer’s Letter

Another key initiative during the period was the signing of an 
updated  MOU  with Acciona  for  construction  activities  at  the 
Muga  Project.  Acciona  has  continued  to  provide  advice  and 
support to the business since its initial engagement some two 
years ago. 

At Highfield and its Spanish subsidiary Geoalcali we have an 
uncompromising  belief  that  working  in  accordance  with  our 
Core Values of Commitment, Respect, Excellence and Attitude 
will  deliver  the  outcomes  that  all  of  us  as  stakeholders  are 
seeking.  I  would  like  to  take  this  opportunity  to  thank  all  of 
the team at Geoalcali as well as the Highfield Board for their 
commitment,  support  and  dedication.  It  is  an  outstanding 
group of professionals. 

Muga  is  clearly  a  great  project  and  our  first  and  overriding 
priority is to bring the Muga Mine into operation.  Exploration 
activities  on  the  projects  on  our  tenements  are  advancing 
in  line  with  Company  plans  and  will  accelerate  once  Muga 
commences construction.

I  look  forward  to  a  challenging  but  successful  year  ahead  in 
2018 for the Company.

Peter Albert

23 March 2018 

Dear Shareholders

The past six months have been a period of intense activity for the 
management team. During May and June 2017, the authorities 
in  Madrid  completed  their  initial  review  of  the  Company’s 
revised submission and in July 2017 they initiated the formal 
process  of  seeking  input  from  all  relevant  government  and 
other  interested  parties.  Reports  and  comments  from  all 
those parties, except two, were received prior to the end of 
November  2017.  In  parallel,  the  Company  decided  to  initiate 
a  voluntary  second  public  exposition  of  its  environmental 
submission which commenced in early September 2017 and 
was completed by mid-October 2017. By the end of November 
2017, the Company had formally responded to all submissions 
in both the formal and voluntary process – except of course 
for  the  two  outstanding  reports.  The  Company  considers 
that in all of this documentation, there was nothing material 
or  significant  that  could  impact  on  the  authorities’  ability  to 
issue  an  environmental  permit  to  the  Company.  The  two 
outstanding  reports  were  received  in  January  and  February 
2018 and MAPAMA has subsequently requested, as the final 
step  in  the  process,  that  the  Company  provide  more  detail 
and  clarification  around  the  areas  of  seismicity,  subsidence, 
and  salt  by-product  management.    MAPAMA  has  requested 
that this clarification be provided within three months. I remain 
confident that the work completed over the past 18 months 
will  yield  the  result  that  the  Company  and  all  stakeholders 
desire.   

Once  the  environmental  permit  is  received,  the  Company 
can  then  formally  commence  the  application  for  the  mining 
concession and various construction permits required. Whilst 
all of the authorities required to issue these permits have been 
actively engaged in the process to date, it is not possible to 
actually  submit  applications  until  the  environmental  permit 
is  received  and  any  conditions  are  well  understood.  These 
construction permits may take some months to receive but it is 
understood to be mostly a procedural process.  The Company 
has been in dialogue with the relevant bodies and has already 
prepared  preliminary  documentation  in  anticipation  of  when 
formal applications can commence.

Whilst  the  environmental  permitting  process  has  been 
advancing,  the  team  has  also  been  taking  the  opportunity 
to review other aspects of the project. Of particular note are 
additional  metallurgical  testwork  seeking  to  optimise  the 
flowsheet,  mining  studies  to  confirm  and  optimise  decline 
development and mine planning, and planning and tendering 
of  early  packages  to  enable  commencement  of  construction 
as soon as the relevant permits are received. 

5

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability 
Report

6

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders7

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersAbout this section

Since 2015, Highfield Resources, with its 
subsidiary Geoalcali, has published sustainability 
report summaries within the Company´s annual 
reports, as well as standalone sustainability reports 
published on the Group´s corporate webpages. The 
information in these reports covered the financial 
years ended 30 June. 

As a result of changing its reporting period end 
from June to December, from 2018 the Group will 
align its future annual reports and sustainability 
reports on a calendar basis.  As a transitional 
measure, rather than prepare a standalone 
sustainability report based on Global Reporting 
Initiative (“GRI”) Standards for the short reporting 
period for the six months 1 July 2017 to 31 
December 2017, the Company has decided that 
its next GRI sustainability report will instead cover 
the 18 months period 1 July 2017 to 31 December 
2018.

This section therefore represents an abbreviated 
sustainability report that is not based on GRI 
Standards.  It covers the six months financial 
period from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2017, 
reporting on reporting on corporate social 
responsibility (“CSR”) initiatives which are aligned 
with the Company’s corporate vision of creating 
a sustainable potash business. The sustainability 
strategy of the Company continues its focus 
on four fundamental areas: Our Business, Our 
Environment, Our People and Our Community. 

8

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersOur Business

MILESTONES IN THE PERMITTING PROCESS

The  Company  has  continued  its  environmental  evaluation  process  in  order  to  obtain  the  Environmental  Impact  Statement  - 
Declaración de Impacto Ambiental (“DIA”) (or “DIA”) for the Muga Project.

MILESTONES IN THE PERMITTING PROCESS
( CONSULTATION OF AFFECTED ENTITIES AND STAKEHOLDERS AND VOLUNTARY SECOND PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS)

June 2017

July 2017

The  completed  updated  documentation  was  presented  on  28  April  2017  to  the  Ministry  of 
Agriculture,  Fishing,  Food  and  Environment  (“MAPAMA”)  which  in  turn  passed  it  to  the  Ministry 
of  Industry,  Energy, Tourism  and  Digital  Agenda  (“MINETAD”)  as  the  next  step  in  the  process. 
MAPAMA commenced its technical evaluation that will form the basis of the official DIA response.

MINETAD as the responsible coordinator for the process, commenced a Consultation of Affected 
Entities  and  Stakeholders  for  the  updated  documentation  in  accordance  with  Article  37.5  of  the 
Environmental Evaluation Law 21/2013.

Geoalcali decided to submit the updated documentation voluntarily to a second public consultation 
period,  making  it  available  to  all  stakeholders. The  documents  within  this  new  public  exposition 
were:

_  Mine Development Plan; 
_  Environmental Impact Assessment; and
_  Restoration Plan. 

September 2017

While there was no legislative requirement for Geoalcali to undertake a second public consultation, 
due to the nature of the Project and the time elapsed since the first consultation, Geoalcali believed, 
and continues to believe, that it is important to provide stakeholders with the information related 
to  the  Project  which  formed  the  basis  of  the  environmental  submission  on  28 April  2017.  It  also 
provides a stronger basis for the authorities to support the granting of the DIA and reduces the risk 
of a later challenge by any party that may feel it has not been appropriately consulted.

November  2017

Geoalcali  received  submissions  with  comments  and  recommendations  from  interested  parties, 
administrations  and  other  entities,  excluding  the  reports  from  Instituto  Geológico  y  Minero  de 
España (“IGME”) and from the Ebro river water management authority, Confederación Hidrográfica 
del Ebro (“CHE”), which were received in January and February 2018, respectively. 

Geoalcali presented responses to all submissions received to date.

Geoalcali confirmed that it had received copies of the two remaining reports submitted to MAPAMA 
by IGME and CHE in January and February.

March 2018

The  Company  also  confirmed  that  MAPAMA  had  completed  its  review  of  the  reports  received 
from  all  of  the  referral  authorities,  and  had  requested  further  clarification,  within  three  months, 
on seismicity, subsidence and salt by-product management, as the final step in the environmental 
permitting process.  

9

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportCOMMITMENT TO 
TRANSPARENCY AND 
PUBLIC INFORMATION

The  permitting  process  for  the  Muga  Project  has  included  a 
public consultation held in 2015 as required under Article 36 
of  Environmental  Evaluation  Law  21/2013.  The  legislation 
also  requires  the  Consultation  of  Affected  Entities  and 
Stakeholders  under  Article  37.5  of  Environmental  Evaluation 
Law  21/2013. This  process  commenced  in  July  2017.  Parallel 
to  the  Consultation  of  Affected  Entities  and  Stakeholders, 
Geoalcali  carried  out  a  voluntary  second  public  consultation, 
not  required  by  law  but  as  a  commitment  to  inform  all 
stakeholders about the updated documentation that improved 
the project, including suggestions incorporated from the 2015 
public  consultation  process  and  suggestions  from  Affected 
Entities and Stakeholders.  

The  voluntary  second  public  consultation  commenced  in 
September  2017  to  avoid  the  summer  holiday  period  and  to 
ensure  a  greater  stakeholder  participation.  It  was  officially 
endorsed  and  published  in  the  Government  Gazettes  of 
Aragon, Navarra and the Central Government. The duration of 
this consultation, as regulated by law, was 30 days.

In addition to the permitting process Geoalcali also published 
the updated documentation on its corporate website, making it 
accessible to anyone with an interest in the project.  Geoalcali 
also held an Open Doors event in the town of Sangüesa close to 
the intended mine site, inviting the surrounding communities 
to participate in a transparent communication forum.

10

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportANALYSIS OF SUBMISSIONS 
FROM STAKEHOLDERS 

Geoalcali  is  committed  to  listening  to  all  stakeholders’ 
suggestions.  Stakeholders  have  participated  in  the  official 
consultation  phase  and  they  also  have  constant  access  to 
information  generated  by  Geoalcali  through  a  number  of 
different  open  communication  channels  (further  explained  in 
the section “Our Community”). 

As  a  response  to  the  Consultation  of  Affected  Entities  and 
Stakeholders, Geoalcali has received reports from:

_  Ten Departments  in the  Administration. None  of  which
have  indicated  a  critical  impact  nor  administrative  or 
technical obstacle/barrier. Many have confirmed their prior 
observations  and  indications  integrated  in  the  technical 
documentation;

_  Two political parties  (EH  Bildu  of Sangüesa and  Chunta
Aragonesista). These parties requested that Geoalcali hold 
a  new  public  information  period,  which  has  been  carried 
out  through  the  voluntary  public  consultation  process. 
They also provided a number of suggestions regarding the 
project, to which responses have been given; and 

_  Five reports  with  submissions  from  three  ecologist
associations  and  two  individuals  which  have  received 
responses to the questions presented. 

The  communities  surrounding  the  project  have  a  total 
population of 6,550 inhabitants:

As part of the voluntary second public consultation, Geoalcali 
has also received submissions from:

Aragón

_ Four government departments, which as mentioned
above do not refer to the project having a critical impact;
_  Four local administrations of towns within 50 kilometres of
the Muga Project, whose questions have been addressed;
_  Three  political  parties,  whose  questions  have been

addressed;

_ Seven  associations,  four  of  whom  are   ecologist

associations; and

_ Two formats of submissions drafted by an anti-mine
platform and an ecologist association were signed in total 
by 610 individuals (only 93 of whom are from the region). 

received  19  submissions 

By  contrast,  during  the  first  public  consultation  in  2015, 
Geoalcali 
from  government 
departments  and  3  formats  of  submissions  from  the  same 
anti-mine platform and an ecologist association, signed by 476 
individuals, only 124 of whom were from the region.

As a proportion of the population, the number of submissions 
per person from the surrounding communities fell from 1.9 per 
100 persons during the first public consultation to 1.4 during 
the second.

Undués de Lerda

Urriés

Sos del Rey Católico

Navardún

Los Pintanos

Navarra

Sangüesa

Javier

Liédena

Rocaforte

Yesa

61

37

614

43

44

5,020

103

303

40

285

11

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportENHANCING OUR CORE 
VALUES

Our  core  values  are  Commitment,  Respect,  Excellence  and 
Attitude  (“CREA”).  Behaving  according  to  these  core  values 
is  fundamental  to  the  Company´s  vision  of  developing  a 
successful,  sustainable  potash  business  with  respect  for 
stakeholders and the environment. 

For this reason, a number of initiatives have been carried out 
to encourage all employees to uphold the core values of the 
Company.

“The  commitment  to  CREA  is 
absolutely  necessary  for  each 
and every one of us. CREA is the 
fundamental glue that keeps us 
united!”

The Company believes that maintaining an open and respectful 
two way communication with staff is crucial for understanding 
the  Company’s  vision  and  strategy  and  emphasises  the 
commitment  of  the  Company  towards  an  honest  and 
transparent work environment.  The following initiatives helped 
the Group reinforce this philosophy: 

_ Lunches  with  Peter  -  in which  a group of five or six
people  at  a  time  get  together  to  talk  with  the  CEO  in  a 
relaxed  environment.  All  employees  are  presented  with 
this opportunity.

_ Coffee talks - brief talks or themed presentations from
specific team members on topics of interest. During the 
six months period a number of coffee talks have also been 
presented by local professionals on a variety of beneficial 
topics such as sport activity, nutrition, and mindfulness. 

_ CREA(tive) Competition - employees were asked to
submit creative ideas that will help improve any aspect of 
the Company. The awards were presented at a Christmas 
Party alongside the Health and Safety awards (see below).  
The winning ideas, chosen from over 30 entries, were:

CEO, Peter Albert

- Using 360 degree feedback to evaluate Geoalcali´s
management and workforce;

- Installation of solar panels on the roofs of the Muga
Mine buildings to produce energy and offset greenhouse 
gas emissions; and

- Creation of a team planning board where employees
identify their current tasks and stay informed of others´ 
tasks, in order to carry out work punctually and improve 
distribution of the workload. 

_ Awareness via Communication material - new corporate
materials  have  been  used  to  promote  the  CREA  values 
and their increasing incorporation into the daily lives of our 
employees.

_ Performance  Review  Process  -  at  the  end of the
calendar  year  all  personnel  have  an  annual  performance 
assessment based on achievement of personal goals and 
alignment with CREA values. A six months interim review 
is also performed half way through the year. 

12

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportOur Environment

ENVIRONMENTAL 
AWARENESS CAMPAIGNS

ZERO ENVIRONMENTAL 
INCIDENTS

During the period, no environmental incidents occurred in the 
workplace,  fulfilling  the  Company’s  environmental  protection 
objective  of  zero  environmental  accidents  during  exploration 
drilling activities.

The  following  environmental  awareness  campaigns  were 
carried out during the six months period:

Use of Green Search Engine Technology in our 
Offices

This initiative consists of the installation of Ecosia as a search 
engine on our office computers.  Ecosia donates 80% of its 
profits from search advertising revenue to support tree planting 
programmes around the world. Desertification of land due to 
deforestation  is  a  cause  of  poverty  with  huge  implications 
for  environmental,  social  and  economic  improvements  in 
disadvantaged areas. 

The Importance of Recycling

Panels  have  been  created  and  displayed  on  Geoalcali’s 
premises  highlighting  the  benefits  of  recycling  and  waste 
separation as well as the problems produced by excess waste 
generation and dumping and the lack of management of these 
aspects. The Company believes that a few simple habits can 
have a positive effect in the environment.

13

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportOPEN DOORS EVENT

On  11  October  2017,  an  Open  Doors  Event  was  held  in  the 
warehouse in Sangüesa that Geoalcali uses for its exploration 
programme. 

Approximately  200  local  people  were  able  to  see  first-hand 
all  the  information  regarding  the  Muga  Project.  Among  the 
attendees  were  the  mayors  of  towns  and  villages  close  to 
the  Muga  Mine  location  including  Sangüesa,  Javier,  Yesa, 
Ezprogui, Liédena, Cáseda, Lumbier, Petilla de Aragón, Undués 
de Lerda, Sada and Rocaforte, as well as members of different 
associations  and  representatives  from  Cederna  Garalur  and 
Adefo (regional institutions that help boost these rural areas).

The event was also attended by more than 50 students from 
the Institute of Professional Training of Lumbier.

Along a route established inside the warehouse, the attendees 
were  able  to  understand  details  of  the  current  phase  of  the 
project,  the  environmental  management  processes  and  the 
economic  and  social  benefits  that  will  be  generated  by  the 
Muga Mine. The visitors were also able to meet the Geoalcali 
management  and  technical  team  members  to  discuss  the 
project.

Our Community

ENGAGEMENT WITH THE 
COMMUNITY

Since  its  inception,  the  Company  has  been  committed  to 
transparency as key to an open and continuous communication 
with the local communities. Different talks, presentations and 
diverse activities have been undertaken by Geoalcali and such 
activities will continue throughout all stages of the project.

Our communication activities in numbers 
up to the end of December 2017 have 
included:

_ More than 1,400 people have been involved in

information processes;

_ 12 information days on various subjects have been

carried out;

_ Two public consultations have been held for the Muga
Project, the second carried out voluntarily by Geoalcali;
_ The complete information portfolio for Muga Mine is

available on the website;

_  Adoption  of  a  voluntary  Public  Participation  Process

methodology, a pioneer example in the industry;

_ More than 22 update communications have been sent

out;

_ Geoalcali has distributed 18,000 information leaflets in

communities close to the Muga Mine location;
_ Installation of suggestion boxes in nearby towns;
_  More than 4,000 people have subscribed to Geoalcali´s

database;

_ Some local Councils have initiated a section to provide
information on Muga Mine on their websites; and
_ More than 200 people attended the Open Doors Event. 

14

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportCOMMUNITY FEEDBACK 

While  some  have  expressed  their  disagreement  about  the 
Muga  Project,  no  complaints  have  been  made  about  the 
conduct of the Company.

A  number  of  queries  were  received  in  2017  from  both  the 
website  and  suggestion  boxes,  all  of  which  have  been 
answered.  As  with  the  questionnaires  noted  above,  there 
were more queries in the second half of 2017 compared with 
the first half, confirming increasing interest in the project. 

Received

Answered

H1

5

5

H2

17

17

100%

100%

CERTIFICATES AND 
RECOGNITION 

In 2017 Geoalcali received the renewal of its Corporate Social 
Responsibility  certificates  from  the  Governments  of  both 
Navarra and Aragón.

PARTICIPATION FROM THE 
LOCAL COMMUNITY 

As  shown  in  the  graph  below,  there  were  83  questions  or 
comments  from  the  community  in  the  second  half  of  2017 
through  Geoalcali’s  “Queremos  escucharte”  (“We  want  to 
listen  to  you”)  online  and  offline  questionnaires,  compared 
with 20 in the first half of 2017.

Number of communications by type and 
quarter during 2017

The above graph shows that 68% of comments were in favour 
of the project, 5% against and 27% from those who wish to 
know more about the project. The majority of the requests for 
more information came from the Open Doors Event, indicating 
increased interest in the project and the success of the event 
in  encouraging  participation  from  the  community.  One  of 
the  key  questions  in  the  questionnaires  is “¿Piensas  que  el 
Proyecto traerá riqueza a la zona?” (Do you think the project 
will bring wealth to the region?) with responses indicating that 
93% of those who have participated agree with the positive 
economic impact the project will have on the region.

Do you believe the project will benefit the 
region economically? 

Geoalcali received its InnovaRSE certificate from the 
Government of Navarra

15

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportTHE GEOALCALI FOUNDATION

The Geoalcali Foundation continues to support initiatives that aim to contribute to a better future and improved social 
well-being  in  the  neighbouring  communities. These  initiatives  are  based  on  the  Foundation´s  four  pillars  which  are 
shown below and which are also part of the UN’s Sustainability Development Goals: 

_ Social Integration;
_ Sustainable Communities;
_ Quality Education; and
_ Commitment to the Environment.

Over the course of 2017, and especially in the six months ended in December, a variety of new projects were developed, 
while longer term initiatives continued to be supported. Initiatives in the second half of the year were:

Geoalcali Foundation Pillar  

Social 
Integration

Sustainable 
Communities

Quality 
Education

Commitment 
to the 
Environment

ISO 26000 guidelines 
& UN Sustainability 
Development Goals

Geoalcali Foundation Initiative

Initiatives that promote 
Health 

School Programme “Growing 
Healthy Together”

Medical and ambulance 
expenses during local festivities 
in Sangüesa

Development and access 
to technology

Alta Cinco Villas Community 
e-learning programme

Support for Liedena’s cultural 
heritage initiatives

Promotion of Education 
and Culture

Penultimate trip of the Irati train 
school history programme

Employment Creation and 
Activity Development

Social Investments

Brotherhood of Santa Bárbara 
festivities

Improvement of facilities for 
the reuse, resale, salvage, 
recycing or disposal of electric 
waste

Charity gala to raise money for 
solidarity projects for children 
with disabilities

Cadete football tournament, 
“Castiliscar Histórica”

School transport services for 
Undués de Lerda

Production of benefit calendars 
with Anfas, an association 
that helps in the integration 
of disadvantaged people in 
Sangüesa

16

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability Report 
Our People

HEALTH AND SAFETY

STAFF TRAINING

During the six months financial period, employees of Geoalcali 
engaged  in  both  office  work  and  activities  in  the  field  and 
there  were  no  accidents  or  incidents.  However,  during  an 
exploration  drilling  campaign  a  contractor  suffered  a  minor 
musculoskeletal  injury,  due  to  overstrain  when  handling  the 
drill string.  This lost time injury resulted in a short period of 
absence from work.

Geoalcali  continues  to  strive 
for  the  achievement  of  zero 
accidents  amongst  all  persons 
engaged in our project activities – 
whether employees, contractors 
or consultants. 

On  1  June  2017,  an  incentives  programme  was  created  to 
increase the engagement of employees in a positive culture of 
health and safety and environmental management.

The  aim  of  this  programme  is  to  have  zero  incidents  and 
accidents  in  the  work  place.  This  goal  cannot  be  achieved 
without active employee participation and all employees need 
to be aware of the importance of creating a culture that strives 
for excellence and best practices in health and safety.

The  incentives  programme  takes  into  account  the  individual 
contribution  of  each  worker,  in  terms  of  all  types  of  risks 
detected and proposed preventative measures. 

Following the end of the 2017 incentives programme period, 
the  Incentives  Committee  assessed,  both  qualitatively  and 
quantitatively, the 11 proposals received, and made awards to 
two employees. 

During the six months financial period, 449 training hours were 
completed  including:  English  and  Spanish  language  courses 
to improve internal and external communication; a specialised 
advanced Excel training course for a technical member of the 
team  with  a  high  level  of  Excel  knowledge  who  then  gave 
internal training to others; and a course on the management 
of  grants  for  training  activities  to  understand  the  process  of 
obtaining grants applicable to Geoalcali. 

Safety training was provided to the warehouse operators on 
topics including low voltage electrical maintenance work.

TOWARDS A HEALTHY 
LIFESTYLE

Encouraging healthy habits

Geoalcali is committed to improving the health and fitness of 
its  employees.  In  addition  to  the  provision  of  fresh  fruit  for 
employees,  weekly  mindfulness  sessions  are  carried  out  for 
those  who  wish  to  learn  how  to  relax  the  mind,  focus  their 
attention and calmly handle day to day life.  Sports activities are 
also encouraged to promote health in the workplace. All these 
initiatives are included within the Healthy Living programme.

Certificates and Recognition

During  the  period,  Geoalcali  presented  its  initiatives  to 
promote  healthy  habits  to  the  Sello  y  Premio  Azul  (Healthy 
Company Certificate and Award) organised by Mutua Navarra. 
This  entity  awarded  Geoalcali  the  Sello  Empresa  Saludable 
(Healthy Company Certificate) as well as placing Geoalcali as a 
finalist with three other businesses in Navarra. 

Geoalcali also received the renewal of the Reconcilia Seal, a 
certificate awarded to companies for their efforts in promoting 
work-life balance.

Flu vaccination campaign

The  flu  is  one  of  the  principal  causes  of  absence  in  the 
workplace which occurs every year and affects a large number 
of  workers  on  a  national  level. The  best  form  of  preventing 
the  illness  is  providing  free  vaccination  to  the  employees. 
Geoalcali’s  vaccination  campaign  took  place  between  30 
October and 23 November 2017. 

17

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSustainability ReportDirectors’
Report

18

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders19

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersThe Directors present their report for Highfield Resources Limited (“Highfield Resources”, “Highfield”, or “the Company”) and its 
subsidiaries (“the Group”) for the six months ended 31 December 2017.

The Company changed its financial year end date from 30 June to 31 December to align with the Spanish financial year and the 
Company has elected to present an “annual report” for the six months transitional financial period ended 31 December 2017. The 
comparative period disclosures are for the year ended 30 June 2017.

DIRECTORS

The names, qualifications and experience of the Company’s Directors in office during the period and until the date of this report 
are as follows.   Directors were in office for the entire period unless otherwise stated.

Mr. Derek Carter

Mr. Peter Albert

Ms. Pauline Carr 

Mr. Richard Crookes

Managing Director and Chief 
Executive Officer, BSc (Hons), EMBA, 
FAusIMM, MIOM3, CEng

Independent Non-Executive 
Director, BEcon, MBA, FAICD, FCIS, 
FGIA

Ms. Carr has over 25 years’ 
commercial experience in 
management, corporate 
governance and compliance, 
mergers and acquisitions, investor 
and stakeholder relations and 
corporate restructures. She 
currently provides business 
improvement, compliance, risk 
management, project management 
and corporate governance solutions 
to executive management teams 
internationally. Prior to this, Ms. 
Carr held senior positions with 
Newmont Asia Pacific and ASX 
listed Normandy Mining Limited 
and worked for a number of years 
in the oil and gas sector with 
Exxon Mobil. She sits on several 
Boards and is Deputy Chairman 
of the South Australian Minerals 
and Energy Advisory Council 
and the Minerals and Petroleum 
Expert Group. In the three years 
immediately before the end of the 
six months financial period, Ms. 
Carr held no other directorships of 
any listed companies. 

Mr. Albert has over 30 years’ 
experience in project management, 
general management and 
operations management in 
mining and minerals processing 
in Australia, Africa and Asia.  Mr. 
Albert is a metallurgist and holds 
an Executive MBA degree. He 
is a Member of the Institute 
of Materials, Minerals and 
Mining (London), a Fellow of the 
Australasian Institute of Mining 
and Metallurgy (“AusIMM”) and 
a Chartered Engineer. Mr. Albert 
was awarded the “Mining CEO of 
the Year” at the 2012 Asia Mining 
Congress. Mr. Albert was also 
awarded the “Mining Executive of 
the Year” at the 2013 Asia Mining 
Congress.

Before joining the Company, Mr. 
Albert held CEO roles with two 
Hong Kong listed organisations, 
Jinchuan Group International 
Resources Company and 
G-Resources Group. He has held 
leadership and senior executive 
roles with OZ Minerals Limited, 
Oxiana Limited, Shell-Billiton 
(Australia), Aker Kvaerner (Australia) 
and Johannesburg Consolidated 
Investments (South Africa). In 
the three years immediately 
before the end of the six months 
financial period, Mr. Albert held no 
other directorships of any listed 
companies.

Non-Executive Director, BSc 
(Geology), Grad Dip Applied Finance

Mr. Crookes has over 28 years’ 
experience in the resources and 
investments industries. He is a 
geologist by training having worked 
in the industry most recently as 
the Chief Geologist and Mining 
Manager of Ernest Henry Mining 
in Australia (now Glencore). Prior 
to Mr. Crookes joining EMR 
Capital as an Investment Director 
he was an Executive Director in 
Macquarie Bank’s Metals Energy 
Capital (MEC) Division where he 
managed all aspects of the Bank’s 
principal investments in mining 
and metals companies as well 
as the origination of numerous 
Project Finance transactions.  Mr. 
Crookes has extensive experience 
in deal origination, evaluation, 
structuring, post-acquisition 
management, client relationship 
management, marketing and 
execution of investment entry and 
exits for both private and public 
resources companies in Australia 
and overseas. In the three years 
immediately before the end of the 
six months financial period, Mr. 
Crookes held no other directorships 
of any listed companies.

Independent Non-Executive 
Chairman, BSc, MSc, FAusIMM(CP)

Mr. Carter has over 40 years’ 
experience in exploration and 
mining geology and management.  
He held senior positions in the 
Shell Group of Companies and 
Burmine Ltd before founding 
Minotaur Gold NL in 1993.  He is 
the former Chairman of Petratherm 
Limited (resigned 31 March 2014) 
and Minotaur Exploration Ltd 
(resigned November 2016), and a 
former board member of Intrepid 
Mines Ltd (resigned November 
2015) and Mithril Resources Ltd 
(resigned December 2014), all ASX 
listed companies. In the three years 
immediately before the end of the 
six months financial period, Mr. 
Carter held no other directorships 
of any listed companies.

Mr. Carter is a former President of 
the South Australian Chamber of 
Mines and Energy, former board 
member of the Australian Gold 
Council, is a member of the South 
Australian Minerals and Energy 
Advisory Council and the South 
Australian Minerals and Energy 
Council, and a former Chairman of 
the Minerals Exploration Advisory 
Group. He was awarded AMEC’s  
Prospector  of  the Year Award 
(jointly) in 2003 and is a Centenary 
Medallist.

20

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersMr. Jim Dietz 

Mr. Owen Hegarty

COMPANY SECRETARY

Independent Non-Executive 
Director, B.Eng (Chem), M.Eng 
(Chem)

Mr. Dietz has over 42 years’ 
experience in the fertiliser, chemical 
and petroleum industries, primarily 
in senior operational roles. From 
2000 until 2010, he was Chief 
Operating Officer of Potash 
Corporation of Saskatchewan 
(“PotashCorp”), the world’s largest 
fertiliser company.  Prior to that 
position, Mr. Dietz held a variety 
of other senior management 
roles, including President of 
Nitrogen, during his 17 year career 
with PotashCorp.  During that 
time, Mr. Dietz was responsible 
for global operations as well as 
Safety, Health, and Environment 
performance and Procurement. Mr. 
Dietz also represented PotashCorp 
on the Board of Directors of Arab 
Potash Company. Mr. Dietz is 
a Chemical Engineer and holds 
both a Masters and Bachelors 
designation from the Ohio State 
University. In the three years 
immediately before the end of the 
six months financial period, Mr. 
Dietz held no other directorships of 
any listed companies.

Non-Executive Director, BEc (Hons), 
FAusIMM

Mr. Hegarty has over 40 years’ 
experience in the global mining 
industry. He spent 25 years 
with Rio Tinto where he was 
Managing Director of Rio Tinto 
Asia and Managing Director of 
the Group’s Australian copper 
and gold business. He was the 
founder and CEO of Oxiana Limited 
Group which grew from a small 
exploration company to a multi-
billion dollar Asia Pacific focused 
base and precious metals producer, 
developer and explorer.

Mr. Hegarty is the Executive 
Chairman of specialist resources 
private equity firm, EMR Capital, 
Highfield’s largest shareholder and 
cornerstone investor. In 2006, Mr. 
Hegarty was awarded the AusIMM 
Institute Medal and in 2008 the 
G.J. Stokes Memorial Award for his 
achievements and leadership in the 
mining industry.

In the three years before the end of 
the six months financial period Mr. 
Hegarty, is, or has been, a director 
of various listed and unlisted 
resources companies including 
Hong Kong listed G-Resources 
Group Ltd, Fortescue Metals Group 
Ltd, Tigers Realm Coal Limited and 
EMR Capital. He is also a member 
of a number of Government and 
industry advisory groups. 

Mr. Donald Stephens, BA (Acc), CA

Mr. Stephens has over 25 years’ 
experience in the accounting, 
mining and services industries, 
including 14 years as a partner 
of HLB Mann Judd (SA), a firm 
of Chartered Accountants.  He 
is a Chartered Accountant and 
corporate adviser specialising in 
small cap ASX listed entities.

Mr. Stephens is a director of 
Mithril Resources Limited, Gooroo 
Ventures Limited and Petratherm 
Limited. Additionally he is Company 
Secretary of Mithril Resources 
Limited, Duxton Broadacre Farms 
Limited and Duxton Water Limited 
and various other unlisted public 
companies. Mr. Stephens is a 
former director of Papyrus Australia 
Limited (resigned 24 August 2015), 
Reproductive Health Science 
Limited (resigned 1 September 
2015), Odin Metals Limited 
(formerly Lawson Gold Limited) 
(resigned February 2018) and Crest 
Minerals Ltd (resigned February 
2016).

Directors’ Report

21

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersBoard Committees

REMUNERATION AND NOMINATION COMMITTEE

The principal purpose of the Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its governance and oversight responsibilities in relation 
to remuneration practices so that they:

_  Link rewards to the creation of value for shareholders;
_  Facilitate operational excellence by attracting and retaining talent;
_  Fairly and responsibly reward individuals having regard to individual and Highfield targets and performance as well as

industry remuneration conditions; and

_  Comply with applicable regulatory obligations.

In addition, the Committee oversees selected nomination activities so that boards within the Highfield Group comprise individuals 
who are best able to discharge the responsibilities of directors having regard to the law and excellence in governance standards.

The members of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee are Ms. Pauline Carr (Chairman), Mr. Richard Crookes and Mr. 
Jim Dietz. 

AUDIT, BUSINESS RISK AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

The principle purpose of the Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its governance and oversight responsibilities relating to:

_  The integrity of financial accounting practices and reporting;
_  Risk management;
_  Internal control framework and internal audit;
_  External audit function; and
_  Compliance with the Corporations Act, ASX Listing Rules and the ASX Corporate Governance and Principles.

The members of the Audit, Business Risk and Compliance Committee are Ms. Pauline Carr (Chairman), Mr. Derek Carter and Mr. 
Richard Crookes.

22

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersInterests in the Securities of the Company 

As at the date of this report, the interests of the Directors in the securities of Highfield Resources Limited are:

Director

Ordinary Shares

Options – 
exercisable at $0.75 
each on or before 
11 September 2018

Options – 
exercisable at $2.00 
each on or before 
30 June 2019

Options – 
exercisable at $1.85 
each on or before 
18 November 2024

Options – 
exercisable at $1.34 
each on or before
 30 June 2025

Derek Carter 

Peter Albert 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Owen Hegarty 

9,221,504   

1,500,000 

1,000,000 

- 

-

78,000  

30,000 

- 

50,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3,000,000 

1,820,654

1,000,000 

- 

1,000,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-

-

-

-

Results of Operations  

The Company’s net loss after taxation attributable to the members of Highfield Resources Limited for the six months ended 31 
December 2017 was $469,661 (year ended 30 June 2017: $7,081,884).

Dividends

No dividend was paid or declared by the Company during the six months financial period and up to the date of this report.

Corporate Structure

Highfield Resources Limited is a company limited by shares, which is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. Through its 100% 
owned subsidiary KCL Resources Limited Highfield owns 100% of Geoalcali SL (“Geoalcali”), a Spanish incorporated company 
which holds the Group’s five exploration projects.

Nature of Operations and Principal Activities

The principal activity of the Company during the six months financial period was mineral exploration and progressing its flagship 
Muga Project.

Directors’ Report

23

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersReview of Operations

Highfield Resources Limited is a potash company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange with five 100% owned potash 
projects located in Spain´s potash producing Ebro Basin.

MUGA PROJECT

The Company’s flagship Muga Project is targeting the relatively shallow sylvinite beds in the Muga Project area that covers about 
80km2. Mining is planned to commence at a depth of approximately 350 metres from surface and is therefore ideal for a relatively 
low cost conventional mine accessed via a dual decline, as demonstrated in the Company’s Muga Project Optimisation Study 
completed in November 2015.

MUGA PROJECT APPROVALS PROCESS

On  12  July  2017  the  Company  reported  that  it  had 
elected to open the Muga Project to a voluntary second 
period of public consultation.  

is 

the 

(“MINETAD”),  which 

On  11  September  2017  the  Company  reported  that 
it  had  completed  all  the  required  documentation  to 
commence  the  voluntary  second  public  consultation 
and  that  the  Ministerio  de  Energía, Turismo  y Agenda 
Digital 
responsible 
coordinating  authority,  had  lodged  the  documentation 
with the Government gazette on 2 September 2017. The 
30  working  day  public  review  period  commenced  on 
4 September 2017. The documents that were available 
for stakeholders to review included the documentation 
submitted  to  the  Ministerio  de  Agricultura  y  Pesca, 
Alimentación  y  Medio  Ambiente  (“MAPAMA”)  on 
28  April  2017  as  well  as  the  mine  development  and 
restoration plans. 

In its Quarterly Activities Report for the quarter ended 
30 September 2017 released on 19 October 2017, the 
Company  reported  that  the  voluntary  second  public 
consultation period had closed on 16 October 2017 and 
that it would work closely with the relevant authorities 
to  address  any  new  items  that  may  be  raised  by 
stakeholders of the Muga Project.

The  quarterly  report  also  stated  that  in  early  October, 
Geoalcali  had  hosted  an  Open  Doors  Event  at  its 
facilities  in  Sangüesa,  close  to  the  location  of  the 
project. In total, approximately 200 people, including the 
mayors of most local town halls, took the opportunity 
to visit and hear about the Muga Project from members 
of Highfield’s team in Spain. 

In  its  presentation  made  to  the  Highfield  Annual 
General Meeting on 30 November 2017 the Company 
reaffirmed  that  it  considered  itself  to  be  in  the  final 
stage of the Declaración de Impacto Ambiental (“DIA”) 
process, with continued close engagement with local 
communities which remain extremely supportive, and 
that in its opinion there should be no impediment to a 
positive DIA being issued. 

Figure 1: Map of Highfield’s Muga Project

24

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersIt also highlighted that:

_  following a positive DIA the Department of Mines can

consider the award of the Mining Concession, and

_  construction permits will be necessary from local town
halls and from the Ebro river water management authority, 
Confederación  Hidrográfica  del  Ebro  (“CHE”),  including 
permits  for  power  connections  and  power  lines,  roads, 
and the plant and underground works.

In  its  Quarterly  Activities  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  31 
December  2017  released  on  23  January  2018,  the  Company 
reported that Highfield had responded to all comments raised 
during the voluntary second consultation process. Importantly, 
no  new  material  issues  were  raised  during  this  process  and 
the number of comments submitted was less than in the first 
consultation process in 2015.  In the same Quarterly Activities 
Report  the  Company  reported  that  MINETAD  had  provided 
Highfield  with  all  but  two  of  the  reports  submitted  to  it  by 
interested  parties  and  stakeholders  as  part  of  MINETAD’s 
final  Consultation  of Affected  Entities  and  Stakeholders,  and 
that  the  Company  had  provided  responses  to  all  comments 
and items raised in those reports, which it did not consider to 
contain any material or significant negative matters.

In its corporate presentation of 15 February 2018 the Company 
provided an estimated timeline, starting from award of the DIA, 
of three to six months for receipt of the Mining Concession 
and six to twelve months for receipt of construction permits.

During March 2018 the Company confirmed that it had received 
copies of the two remaining reports submitted to MAPAMA by 
Instituto  Geológico  y  Minero  de  España  (“IGME”)  and  CHE 
in January and February 2018. In its Environmental Permitting 
Update  of  21  March  2018  the  Company  reported  that 
MAPAMA  had  completed  its  review  of  the  reports  received 
from all of the referral authorities, and had requested further 
clarification,  within  three  months,  on  three  items,  namely 
seismicity, subsidence and salt by-product management.

The Company remains confident of receiving its DIA, Mining 
Concession and construction permits.  

MUGA PROJECT TECHNICAL UPDATE

In  its  19  October  2017  Quarterly  Activities  Report  for  the 
quarter  ended  30  September  2017,  the  Company  reported 
that  it  was  conducting  additional  confirmatory  metallurgical 
test work including a full, end-to-end, test of the process flow 
sheet and some additional tests to address areas which could 
be improved through design changes. This may lead to some 
optimisation  of  the  current  process  flow  sheet,  following 
which the Company and Bovis will finalise the project cost and 
schedule review announced in Highfield’s June 2017 Quarterly 
Activities Report dated 18 July 2017.  

In  its  Quarterly  Activities  Report  for  the  quarter  ended  31 
December  2017  released  on  23  January  2018,  the  Company 
reported that it had continued to work on updating the capital 
cost  estimates  from  the  Muga  Optimisation  Study,  which 

was  released  to  the  market  in  November  2015.  During  the 
December  quarter,  metallurgical  test  work  continued  at  the 
Saskatchewan Research Council (“SRC”) in Canada.  This test 
work was completed in the first quarter of 2018, as expected. 
As  noted  above,  this  will  result  in  some  improvements  to 
the  current  process  design.  The  impact  of  these  is  being 
determined and potentially may include re-sizing and changes 
to some equipment to improve overall recoveries and reduce 
operating  risk. There  is  likely  to  be  some  cost  escalation  in 
the more than two years since the last cost estimates were 
published,  and  some  further  increases  are  likely  as  a  result 
of the equipment changes and resizing, as well as increases 
required as a result of permitting requirements. 

The December Quarterly Activities Report also announced that 
tendering and evaluation of the first design and construction 
package was complete.

REVISED MOU SIGNED WITH ACCIONA

As  reported  in  its  September  Quarterly  Activities  Report  of 
19  October  2017,  the  Company  signed  a  new  and  revised 
Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) on 2 October 2017 
with Acciona Infraestructuras (“Acciona”), a well credentialed, 
global  construction  firm  based  in  Spain  with  experience  in 
complex  industrial  projects.    Highfield  and  Acciona  entered 
into  a  collaboration  agreement  in  December  2015,  following 
which  they  collaborated  to  review  capital  cost  estimates 
and  schedules  for  various  parts  of  the  Muga  Project.  Under 
the  revised  MOU  Acciona  was  appointed  as  the  preferred 
construction  contractor 
the 
construction of the Muga Mine.

for  selected  packages 

in 

PROJECT FINANCING

In  August  2015,  the  Company  announced  a  project  finance 
mandate  with  four  Mandated  Lead  Arrangers  (“MLAs”)  for 
long  term  project  facilities  to  fund  the  construction  of  the 
Muga Project.

During the six months ended 31 December 2017, the Company 
continued its dialogue with its project finance syndicate with 
respect to the €185 million facility for Muga. It also engaged 
with other potential providers of capital.

Highfield  remains  confident  of  putting  in  place  its  debt 
financing following receipt of all approvals, to support a final 
investment decision and the commencement of construction.

Directors’ Report

25

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersVIPASCA PROJECT

The Vipasca  Project  area  includes  the  majority  of  the 
Vipasca  permit,  the  entire  Borneau  permit  and  half 
of  the  Osquia  permit.  It  is  located  adjacent  to  the 
Muga Project and covers approximately 120km2.  The 
tenement  is  highly  prospective  for  economic  potash 
mineralisation,  with  a  primary  focus  on  the  deeper, 
higher grade, P1 and P2 potash horizons.

During  the  quarter  ended  30  September  2017,  the 
Company  completed  a  drill  hole  at  Vipasca  designed 
to  test  the  deeper  mineralisation  towards  the  west, 
beyond  the  north  west  extension  of  the  deposit. 
Preliminary  analysis  of  the  core  indicated  a  steeper 
dip  in  the  bedding  relative  to  the  surrounding  area 
than  had  been  expected.    In  addition,  some  faulting 
was  encountered,  which  led  the  Company  to  believe 
the  evaporite  unit  was  significantly  deeper  than  first 
expected. The drill hole was abandoned at 1,022 metres 
without  crossing  the  evaporitic  unit  or  the  expected 
marker horizons above.

During  the  quarter  ended  31  December  2017,  limited 
additional  work  was  carried  out.    Parts  of Vipasca  are 
now  deemed  highly  unlikely  to  yield  an  economic 
Reserve and the Company is now in a position to focus 
on  the  identified  more  prospective  areas.  A  further 
three holes are planned in 2018.

Figure 3: Map of Highfield’s Pintanos Project

26

Directors’ Report

Figure 2: Map of Highfield’s Vipasca Project

PINTANOS PROJECT

Highfield´s  100%  owned  Pintanos  Project  abuts  the 
Muga  Project  and  covers  an  area  of  60km2.  Depths 
from  surface  to  mineralisation  commence  at  around 
500m. The Company is building on substantial historical 
potash  exploration  information  which  includes  seven 
drill  holes  and  ten  seismic  profiles  completed  in  the 
late 1980s.

During  the  six  months  ended  31  December  2017, 
limited additional work was carried out.

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSIERRA DEL PERDÓN PROJECT

Highfield´s  100%  owned  Sierra  del  Perdón  (“SdP”) 
Project  is  located  south  east  of  Pamplona  and  covers 
approximately 145km2. Sierra del Perdón is a brownfield 
project  which  previously  hosted  two  potash  mines 
operating from the 1960s until the late 1990s producing 
nearly  500,000  tonnes  of  K60  MOP  per  annum. The 
evaporite  was  historically  mined  primarily  for  sylvinite 
but also for carnallite, before the mine closure in 1996 
due to relatively low potash prices of around US$100/
tonne. There is potential for potash exploitation in new, 
unmined areas in the Sierra del Perdón Project area.

During  the  quarter  ended  30  September  2017,  limited 
work  was  carried  out  at  SdP.    During  the  quarter 
ended 31 December 2017, an exploration drill hole was 
completed at SdP, the results of which are expected by 
the end of the March 2018 quarter.

After  a  number  of  years  of  exploration  work,  the 
Company  has  now  reached  the  point  where  it  will 
focus  further  work  on  the  most  prospective  areas  of 
SdP and will relinquish the less prospective part of the 
tenements. This is likely to occur in the next six months 
and  a  further  three  holes  are  planned  on  the  highly 
prospective areas identified at SdP.

Figure 4: Map of Highfield’s Sierra del Perdón Project

IZAGA PROJECT

The Izaga Project covers an area of more than 100km2, 
where  historic  drill  holes  and  2D  seismic  show  a 
relatively continuous evaporite with drill hole intersects 
containing  potash.    With  further  positive  exploration 
results,  the  project  could  display  similar  attributes  to 
the Muga Project.

During  the  six  months  ended  31  December  2017, 
limited additional work was carried out.  

Figure 5: Map of Highfield’s Izaga Project

Directors’ Report

27

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersGeoalcali Foundation

Corporate

The Geoalcali Foundation is a not-for-profit Spanish foundation, 
supported  exclusively  by  Geoalcali.  It  was  established  to 
deliver projects into the communities in which the Company 
will operate its mines.

LAPSE OF CLASS B PERFORMANCE 
SHARES

PROJECTS

The  Company’s  community  engagement  programme 
continues  to  be  well  received.  A  programme  highlighting 
clever fertiliser use was launched in regional primary schools 
in  October  2015  and  has  so  far  reached  over  4,000  school 
children in the regions of Navarra and Aragón.

The Geoalcali Foundation currently provides ongoing support 
to  over  20  community  projects  and  since  its  establishment 
in September 2014 has been involved in over 105 community 
projects with town halls, social associations, foundations and 
scientific/agricultural organisations.

On  29  November  2017  the  Company  announced  that 
50,000,000  Class  B  Performance  Shares  had  lapsed.    The 
Class  B  Performance  Shares  were  issued  on  the  basis  that 
they would be converted to ordinary shares upon the receipt, 
to  the  reasonable  satisfaction  of  Highfield,  of  all  referral 
approvals required to construct and operate a 500,000 tonne 
per  annum  potash  mine  on  the  Muga  Project  (including  all 
required  government  approvals,  water  and  energy  contracts 
necessary to operate the mine) prior to 18 October 2017, being 
the  expiry  date  of  the  performance  shares.   The  Directors’ 
assessment was that the vesting conditions had not been met 
and therefore that the performance shares had lapsed.

DIRECTORS

There  were  no  changes  in  Directors  during  the  six  months 
ended 31 December 2017.

28

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersAnnual Review of  Ore Reserves and Mineral 
Resources

In accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5, the Company has performed an annual review of all JORC-compliant ore reserves and 
mineral resources as at 31 December 2017. Rounding differences may occur.

MUGA PROJECT

A maiden Ore Reserve for the Muga Project was calculated as part of the Definitive Feasibility Study as released to the ASX on 
30 March 2015.

An  updated  Ore  Reserve  for  the  Muga  Project  was  calculated  as  part  of  the  project  optimisation  released  to  the ASX  on  17 
November 2015. The Company considers this Ore Reserve to be accurate as at 31 December 2017.

Table 1: Muga Ore Reserves Summary 

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2016

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Proved 

Probable 

Total Proved & Probable 

81.6  

172.1 

253.7 

11.7% 

11.4% 

11.5% 

81.6  

172.1 

253.7 

11.7% 

11.4% 

11.5% 

81.6 

172.1 

253.7 

11.7%

11.4%

11.5%

Highfield released an update to the existing JORC-compliant Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) to the ASX on 24 February 
2015.

A  further  update  to  this  MRE  was  released  to  the ASX  as  part  of  the  project  optimisation  study  on  17  November  2015. The 
Company considers this MRE to be accurate as at 31 December 2017. The MRE includes all Ore Reserves shown above in Table 1.

Table 2: Muga Mineral Resources Summary

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2016

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Measured 

Indicated 

Total Measured & Indicated 

Inferred 

Total 

75.1  

149.4 

224.5 

39.2 

263.7 

13.6% 

13.3% 

13.4% 

13.8% 

13.5% 

75.1  

149.4 

224.5 

39.2 

263.7 

13.6% 

13.3% 

13.4% 

13.8% 

13.5% 

75.1 

149.4 

224.5 

39.2 

263.7 

13.6%

13.3%

13.4%

13.8%

13.5%

Directors’ Report

29

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSIERRA DEL PERDÓN PROJECT

Highfield released a maiden MRE for the Sierra del Perdón Project to the ASX on 7 April 2015. The Company considers this MRE 
to be accurate as at 31 December 2017.

Table 3: Sierra del Perdón Mineral Resources Summary

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2016

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Measured 

Indicated 

Total Measured & Indicated 

Inferred 

Total 

- 

41.8 

41.8 

40.3 

82.1 

- 

10.7% 

10.7% 

10.5% 

10.6% 

- 

41.8 

41.8 

40.3 

82.1 

- 

10.7% 

10.7% 

10.5% 

10.6% 

- 

41.8 

41.8 

40.3 

82.1 

-

10.7%

10.7%

10.5%

10.6%

PINTANOS PROJECT

Highfield released a maiden MRE for the Pintanos Project to the ASX on 20 November 2013.  During the year ended 30 June 
2017, two drill holes were completed at the Pintanos Project (see the Company’s ASX Quarterly Activities Report released on 24 
April 2017).  The results of both holes were unfavourable compared with the block model which informed the maiden Mineral 
Resource Estimate released on 20 November 2013 and therefore adversely impacted the tonnage available to be classified as 
inferred resources. Nonetheless, the Company continues to believe the exploration potential for Pintanos remains strong and will 
continue exploration of the project.

As a result of the above, a revised MRE was prepared, as summarised in Table 4 below. See further details in the ASX Additional 
Information section on page 98 of the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2017. The Company considers this 
MRE to be accurate as at 31 December 2017.

Table 4: Pintanos Mineral Resources Summary

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2016

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Measured 

Indicated 

Total Measured & Indicated 

Inferred 

Total 

- 

- 

- 

70.7  

70.7  

- 

- 

- 

11.9% 

11.9% 

- 

- 

- 

70.7 

70.7 

- 

- 

- 

11.9% 

11.9% 

- 

- 

- 

187.0 

187.0 

-

-

-

11.2%

11.2%

30

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersSUMMARY

A summary of Highfield’s total Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources is shown below.

Table 5: Highfield Total Ore Reserves Summary (all projects)

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2016

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Proved 

Probable 

Total Proved & Probable  

81.6 

172.1 

253.7 

11.7% 

11.4% 

11.5% 

81.6 

172.1 

253.7 

11.7% 

11.4% 

11.5% 

81.6 

172.1 

253.7 

11.7%

11.4%

11.5%

Table 6: Highfield Total Mineral Resources Summary (all projects) 

The MRE includes all Ore Reserves shown above in Table 5.

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2016

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Tonnes In Place 
(Mt)

Grade 
K2O (%)

Measured 

Indicated 

Total Measured & Indicated 

Inferred 

Total 

75.1 

191.2 

266.3 

150.2 

416.5 

13.6% 

12.7% 

13.0% 

12.0% 

12.6% 

75.1 

191.2 

266.3 

150.2 

416.5 

13.6% 

12.7% 

13.0% 

12.0% 

12.6% 

75.1 

191.2 

266.3 

266.5 

532.8 

13.6%

12.7%

13.0%

11.5%

12.2%

Directors’ Report

31

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersCorporate Governance – Resources and Reserve 
Calculations

Due to the nature, stage and size of the Company’s existing operations, the Company has historically concluded that there would 
be insufficient efficiencies or additional governance benefits gained by establishing a separate mineral resources and ore reserves 
committee responsible for reviewing and monitoring the Company’s processes for calculating mineral resources and ore reserves 
and for ensuring that the appropriate internal controls are applied to such calculations. However, the establishment of such a 
committee, at an appropriate time, is under consideration.  In the meantime the Company continues to ensure that all Mineral 
Resource calculations are prepared by a competent, senior geologist and are reviewed and verified independently by a qualified 
person. In addition, the existing composition of the Highfield Board of Directors includes two qualified geologists.

Significant Changes in the State of Affairs 

There have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the six months financial period, other than as 
set out in this report.

Significant Events After the Reporting Date

There have been no significant events after the reporting date requiring disclosure in this report.

Likely Developments and Expected Results of 
Operations

The Directors have excluded from this report any further information on the likely developments in the operations of the Company 
and the expected results of those operations in future financial periods, as the Directors believe that it would be speculative and 
prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

Environmental Regulations and Performance 

The  operations  of  the  Company  are  presently  subject  to  Environmental  Regulation  under  the  laws  of  the  Commonwealth  of 
Australia and of Spain. The Company has been at all times in full environmental compliance with the conditions of its licences.

32

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersShare Options

As at the date of this report there were 51,007,221 unissued ordinary shares under options. The details of the options are as 
follows:

Number

  3,350,000 

  9,500,000 

750,000 

  4,000,000 

  4,832,221 

  1,500,000 

  5,350,000 

 17,175,000 

  4,550,000 

 51,007,221 

Exercise Price
$

 $0.75 

 $0.75 

 $1.00 

$1.25 

$1.34 

$1.85 

$1.85 

$2.00 

$2.50 

Expiry Date

30 June 2018

 11 September 2018

 30 June 2018

30 June 2018

30 June 2025

30 June 2024

18 November 2024

30 June 2019

30 June 2019

No option holder has any right under the options to participate in any other share issue of the Company or any other entity.

The following options were issued during the six month period:

_  4,832,221 options with an exercise price of $1.34, expiring on 30 June 2025
_  1,500,000 options with an exercise price of $1.85, expiring on 30 June 2024

No options were exercised or lapsed during the six months period.

Indemnification and Insurance of Directors and 
Officers

The Company has made an agreement indemnifying all the Directors and officers of the Company against all losses or liabilities 
incurred  by  each  Director  or  officer  in  their  capacity  as  Directors  or  officers  of  the  Company  to  the  extent  permitted  by  the 
Corporations Act 2001. The indemnification specifically excludes willful acts of negligence.

The Company paid insurance premiums in respect of Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance contracts for current Directors 
and officers of the Company and of the Company’s controlled entities.  The liabilities insured are damages and legal costs that 
may be incurred in defending civil or criminal proceedings that may be brought against the officers in their capacity as officers of 
entities in the Group. The total amount of insurance premiums paid has not been disclosed due to confidentiality reasons.

Directors’ Report

33

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
Directors’ Meetings 

The numbers of meetings of Directors and Committees held during the six months financial period and the number of meetings 
attended by each Director were as follows:

Director

Directors’ Meetings

Remuneration and Nomination 
Committee

Audit, Business Risk and 
Compliance Committee

Derek Carter 

Peter Albert 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Owen Hegarty 

A 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

B 

5 

5 

5 

5 

5 

4 

A 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

4 

B 

4* 

3* 

4 

4 

4 

4* 

A 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

2 

B

1

2*

2

2

1*

1*

A number of meetings held during the time the Director held office.
B number of meetings attended. Note that Directors may attend Committee Meetings without being a member of that Committee.
*  Attendance at meeting by invitation

Proceedings on Behalf of Company

No person has applied for leave of the Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the Company or intervene in any proceedings 
to which the Company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or any part of those 
proceedings.  The Company was not a party to any such proceedings during the six months financial period.

Corporate Governance

In recognising the need for the highest standards of corporate behaviour and accountability, the Directors of Highfield support 
and  adhere  to  the  principles  of  sound  corporate  governance. The  Board  recognises  the  recommendations  of  the  Australian 
Securities Exchange Corporate Governance Council, and considers that Highfield is in compliance to the extent possible with 
those  recommendations  which  are  of  importance  and  add  value  to  the  commercial  operation  of  a  listed  proposed  resources 
development company.

The Company has established a set of corporate governance policies and procedures and these can be found, together with the 
Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, on the Company’s website: www.highfieldresources.com.au.

Auditor Independence and Non-Audit Services

Section  307C  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001  requires  the  Company’s  auditors  to  provide  the  Directors  of  Highfield  with  an 
Independence Declaration in relation to the audit of the financial report. A copy of that declaration is included at page 77 of the 
annual report. No non-audit services were provided by the Company’s auditor.

34

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
Audited Remuneration Report

This report, which forms part of the Directors’ report, outlines the remuneration arrangements in place for the key management 
personnel (KMP) of Highfield Resources Limited for the six months ended 31 December 2017. The information provided in this 
remuneration report has been audited as required by Section 308(3C) of the Corporations Act 2001.

The remuneration report details the remuneration arrangements for KMP who are defined as those persons having authority and 
responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Director 
(whether executive or otherwise) of the Group. 

DETAILS OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Directors

Derek Carter 

Peter Albert 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Owen Hegarty 

Key Management 

Mike Norris 

Non-Executive Chairman

Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

Non-Executive Director 

Non-Executive Director

Non-Executive Director 

Non-Executive Director

Chief Financial Officer 

All of the above were KMPs for the entire six months financial period. 

Directors’ Report

35

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersREMUNERATION POLICY

The  Board  is  responsible  for  determining  and  reviewing  compensation  arrangements  for  the  Directors  and  senior  executives 
reporting to the Managing Director. The broad policy is to ensure that remuneration properly reflects the individuals’ duties and 
responsibilities and that remuneration is fair and competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating quality people with appropriate 
skills  and  experience.  At  the  time  of  determining  remuneration  consideration  is  given  by  the  Board  to  the  Group’s  financial 
circumstances and performance.

As part of its suite of corporate governance policies and procedures, the Board has adopted a formal Remuneration and Nomination 
Committee Charter and Remuneration Policy.

In  early  2017  the  Committee  and  Board  reviewed  the  remuneration  framework  for  executives  and  established  the  following 
parameters.

Level

Short Term Incentive

Long Term Incentive1

Managing Director

Up to 80% of fixed remuneration

75% Corporate KPIs and 25% Personal KPIs2 

Senior Executives

Up to 60% of cash remuneration

(60% Corporate KPIs and 40% Personal KPIs )

Senior Management

Up to 40% of cash remuneration

(40% Corporate KPIs and 60% Personal KPIs)

Up to 100% of fixed remuneration in the form of options 
subject to performance hurdles

Up to 75% of fixed remuneration in the form of options 
subject to performance hurdles

Up to 50% of fixed remuneration in the form of options 
subject to performance hurdles

1 The performance vesting conditions of each grant are aligned to the creation of long term value for shareholders. Market based performance
(being the relative performance of the Company’s share price over a three year period against the S&P/ASX 300 Resources Index (XKR)) accounts 
for 50% of vesting conditions. Total Shareholder Return over the three year assessment period accounts for the remaining 50% of the vesting 
conditions. In general, the participant must also remain employed with the Company for a continuous period of three years from the grant date.

2 The Board has subsequently determined that with effect from 1 January 2018 the weighting of Mr. Albert’s STI be changed to 100% for corporate

and strategic KPIs. 

REMUNERATION PHILOSOPHY 

The Company and its controlled entities aim to position themselves so that the total remuneration paid to their employees will 
be at the median of the market. The Remuneration and Nomination Committee will undertake a market benchmarking review of 
executive positions at least once every three years to ensure that the Company’s remuneration offerings remain competitive with 
its contemporary peer group.

USE OF REMUNERATION CONSULTANTS

The  Board  and  the  Remuneration  and  Nomination  Committee  seek  and  consider  advice  from  independent  remuneration 
consultants to ensure that they have relevant information to the determination of all facets of remuneration relating to the KMP 
and  senior  executives  reporting  to  the  Managing  Director. The  engagement  of  remuneration  consultants  is  governed  by  the 
Remuneration  and  Nomination  Committee  Charter  which  sets  the  protocols  and  restrictions  around  the  interaction  between 
management and the consultants with a view to minimising the risk of any undue influence occurring and ensuring compliance 
with the Corporations Act 2001 requirements.

The advice and recommendations of consultants are used by the Board and Committee as a guide in formulating remuneration 
and policy. Decisions are made by the Board after its own consideration of the issues, but having regard to the advice of the 
Committee and consultants.

36

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersREVIEW OF KMP REMUNERATION

To ensure that the KMP remuneration remains consistent with the Company’s remuneration policy, KMP and senior executive 
remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board with the assistance of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee and, as 
required, external remuneration consultants. When performing the remuneration review, the Board considers:

_  the Company’s remuneration policy and practices;
_  relevant market benchmarks;
_  the skills and experience required of each role in order to grade positions accurately and attract high calibre people; and
_  strategy, business plans and budgets.

COMPONENTS OF REMUNERATION OF OTHER KPM AND SENIOR EXECUTIVES

Total Fixed Remuneration (“TFR”)

At-risk remuneration

Short Term Incentive (“STI”)

Long Term Incentive (“LTI”)

Base remuneration that reflects 
the job size, role, responsibilities 
and professional competence 
of each executive, according to 
their knowledge, experience and 
accountabilities and considering 
external market relativities.

Variable, performance based, annual 
cash incentive plan designed to 
reward high performance against 
challenging, clearly defined and 
measurable objectives that are based 
on a mix of Corporate and Personal 
KPI targets that are set to incentivise 
superior performance.
The Board may determine from time 
to time that the STI be paid in shares 
in lieu of cash.

The equity component of the at-risk 
reward opportunity, linked to the 
creation of shareholder value.

The mix of fixed and at-risk remuneration varies depending on the role and level of executive, and also depends on the performance 
of the Company and individual. Compared with other employees, senior positions have a greater proportion of at-risk remuneration 
and have a higher proportion of their at-risk remuneration assessed on Company performance KPIs.

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (“NED”) REMUNERATION

On appointment to the Board, each NED enters into a service agreement with the Group in the form of a letter of appointment. 
The letter summarises the Board policies and terms, including compensation, relevant to the Director.

NED remuneration is reviewed annually by the Board. NEDs receive a fixed fee remuneration consisting of an annual base Board 
fee with additional fees for any committee positions they hold. From time to time and in accordance with the Constitution the 
Board may also award once off extra exertion amounts where they determine such payments are warranted.

The aggregate remuneration for NEDs has been set at an amount not to exceed $500,000 per annum. This amount may only be 
increased with the approval of Shareholders at a general meeting.

Directors’ Report

37

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersDETAILS OF NED REMUNERATION

Fees

Board 

Remuneration and Nomination Committee 

Audit, Business Risk and Compliance Committee 

Chairman per annum
$

Member per annum
$

90,000 

15,000 

15,000 

60,000

7,500 

7,500

All NEDs (including the Chairman) are entitled to be reimbursed for travelling and other expenses properly incurred by them in 
attending any meeting or otherwise in connection with the business or affairs of the Company.

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR SHORT TERM INCENTIVES

Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”) are aligned to reflect corporate and strategic objectives.  KPIs are reviewed by the Company’s 
Remuneration and Nomination Committee and approved by the Board. The KPIs of the Managing Director and his direct reports 
are also reviewed by the Committee, and typically cover targets in respect of safety, permitting, finance, project delivery, investor 
relations and social responsibility. The KPIs of the Managing Director were cascaded down to his direct reports as appropriate to 
their areas of responsibility.  

The  KPIs  for  the  six  months  financial  period  ended  31  December  2017  were  assessed  in  accordance  with  the  parameters 
established in early 2017 as set out in the Remuneration Policy section above.  The STI for the Managing Director was based 
on 75% for corporate and strategic KPIs and 25% for personal KPIs.  The STIs for direct reports of the Managing Director were 
based on a weighting of between 40% and 60% for corporate and strategic KPIs and between 60% and 40% for personal KPIs.

The  Board  has  determined  that  with  effect  from  1  January  2018  the  weighting  of  Mr. Albert’s  STI  be  changed  from  75%  for 
corporate and strategic KPIs and 25% for personal KPIs to 100% for corporate and strategic KPIs.  

Summary Corporate and Strategic KPI Performance

For the six months ended 31 December 2017 corporate and strategic KPI performance outcomes for KMPs were assessed as 
follows:

Weighting for 2017
%

2017 Outcome
%

15 

25 

20 

40 

100 

15

24

19

-

58

KPI Category

Safety, Health, Environmental and Community 

Financials 

Project Progress 

Approvals 

Total 

38

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersShort Term Incentive Award

The remuneration of the Managing Director, Peter Albert, and the Chief Financial Officer, Mike Norris, for the six months financial 
period included cash bonuses in respect of meeting STI KPIs agreed by the Board.  The STI awards relate to the achievement 
of KPIs for the year ended 30 June 2017 for which the bonus cost was approved by the Board and paid during the six months 
ended 31 December 2017, and the achievement of KPIs for the six months ended 31 December 2017 for which the bonus cost 
was accrued at the end of the period and paid in February 2018.  The cost of both awards is therefore included in the financial 
statements for the six months ended 31 December 2017. 

LTI PERFORMANCE AND OUTCOMES FOR 2017 

Awards granted under the Highfield Resources Limited LTI Plan consist of share options which are granted for no consideration 
and  carry  no  dividend  or  voting  rights.  Following  vesting  and  subsequent  exercise  of  the  options  one  ordinary  share  in  the 
Company will be allocated per option. 

The vesting conditions of each grant are aligned to the creation of long term value for shareholders. Market based performance 
(being the relative performance of the Company’s share price over a three year period against the S&P/ASX 300 Resources Index 
(XKR)) accounts for 50% of vesting conditions. Total Shareholder Return over the three year assessment period accounts for the 
remaining 50% of the vesting conditions.

In general, the KMP must also remain employed with the Company for a continuous period of three years from the grant date. 
Details of the prior awards for relevant KMP are set out in the Remuneration Report section of the Annual Report for the year they 
were granted, under the heading Options Affecting Remuneration.

Directors’ Report

39

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersDETAILS OF REMUNERATION

Details of the nature and amount of each element of the remuneration of each Director and other key management personnel of 
the Group for the six months ended 31 December 2017 are as below:

Short term

Options

Post-employment

Base
Salary
$

Fees
$

STI
Awards1
$  

Other 
Benefits
$

Share- 
Based
Payments
$

Super-
annuation
$

Benefits
$

Performance 
related
%

Total
$

Six months ended
31 December 2017

 Directors 

Derek Carter 

Peter Albert 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Owen Hegarty 

Key Management 

- 

48,750 

- 

- 

- 

332,376 

- 

442,048 

105,7042 

268,073 

- 

- 

- 

- 

45,000 

37,500 

33,750 

30,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

48,750 

-

1,148,201 

23%

45,000 

37,500 

33,750 

30,000 

-

-

-

-

589,042 

1,932,243 

20%

20%

Mike Norris 

188,932 

- 

253,194 

29,0203 

117,896 

521,308 

195,000 

695,242 

134,724 

385,969 

1 The STI awards relate to the achievement of KPIs for the year ended 30 June 2017 for which the bonus cost was approved by the Board and paid
during the six months ended 31 December 2017, and the achievement of KPIs for the six months ended 31 December 2017 for which the bonus 
cost was accrued at the end of the period.  The cost of both awards is therefore included in the financial statements for the six months ended 
31 December 2017.

2 Benefits relate to paid private accommodation and in-country residency allowance.

3 Benefit relates to paid private accommodation.

40

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Details of remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2017 are shown below: 

Short term

Options

Post-employment

Year ended 30 June 2017

Base
Salary
$

Fees
$

STI
Awards4
$  

Other 
Benefits
$

Share- 
Based
Payments
$

Super-
annuation
$

Benefits
$

Performance 
related
%

Total
$

 Directors 

Derek Carter 

Peter Albert1 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Anthony Hall2 

Owen Hegarty 

Pedro  Rodriguez3 

Key Management 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

97,500 

518,245 

- 

- 

- 

168,2005 

166,667 

90,000 

75,000 

67,500 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

87,500 

420,000 

60,000 

- 

20,833 

88,834 

1,2006 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

289,394 

289,394 

- 

- 

Mike Norris 

31,127 

330,482 

88,183 

23,8176 

22,188 

549,372 

828,815 

597,017 

193,217 

767,643 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

97,500 

-

853,112 

20%

90,000 

75,000 

356,894 

796,894 

60,000 

-

-

81%

89%

-

110,867 

80%

495,797 

2,936,064 

22%

46%

1 Peter Albert was appointed 1 September 2016.

2 Anthony Hall resigned 31 August 2016.

3 Pedro Rodriguez resigned 1 August 2016.

4 The STI award relates to the achievement of 2016 KPIs that were approved by the Board and paid during the year ended 30 June 2017.

5 Benefits relate to paid private accommodation and in-country residency allowance.

6 Benefit relates to paid private accommodation.

Directors’ Report

41

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SHAREHOLDINGS OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

The  number  of  shares  in  the  Company  held  by  Directors  and  other  key  management  personnel  of  the  Group,  including  their 
personally  related  parties,  is  set  out  below. There  were  no  shares  granted  as  compensation  during  the  six  months  ended  31 
December 2017.

Six months ended
31 December 2017

Balance at the start
of the period

Granted as 
compensation 
during the period 

On exercise of 
share options

Other changes 
during the period

Balance at the end
of the period

Directors 

Derek Carter 

Peter Albert 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Owen Hegarty 

Key Management 

Mike Norris 

    9,221,504 

78,000 

- 

- 

50,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

30,0001 

- 

- 

- 

- 

9,221,504 

78,000

30,000

-

50,000

-

-

1 Ms. Carr purchased 30,000 fully paid ordinary shares through an indirect entity in which she has an interest. The purchase was made via an on

market trade on 27 December 2017.

All  equity  transactions  with  Directors  and  other  key  management  personnel  other  than  those  arising  from  the  exercise  of 
remuneration options have been entered into under terms and conditions no more favourable than those the Company would 
have adopted if dealing at arm’s length. 

42

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OPTION HOLDINGS OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

The number of options over ordinary shares in the Company held by each Director and other key management personnel of the 
Group, including their personally related parties, is set out below:

Balance at 
the start of the 
period

Granted as 
compensation 
during the 
period

Exercised 
during the 
period

Other changes 
during the 
period

Balance at 
the end of the 
period

Exercisable

Not 
exercisable

Six months ended
31 December 2017

Directors 

Derek Carter 

2,500,000 

- 

Peter Albert 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

3,000,000 

1,820,654 

1,000,000 

- 

Jim Dietz 

1,000,000 

Owen Hegarty 

- 

Key Management 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Mike Norris 

2,450,000 

800,703 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2,500,000 

2,500,000 

-

4,820,654 

- 

4,820,654

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

- 

- 

1,000,000 

1,000,000 

- 

- 

-

-

-

-

3,250,703 

2,000,000 

1,250,703

No option holder has any right under the options to participate in any other share issue of the Company or any other entity.

Options granted as part of remuneration have been valued using the binomial method (which is derived from the Black-Scholes 
option pricing model but is considered more suitable for companies which do not pay dividends) taking into account the exercise 
price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying 
share and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option.

Options granted under the Company’s employee share option plan carry no dividend or voting rights. For details on the valuation 
of options, including models and assumptions used, please refer to note 18.

Directors’ Report

43

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND OTHER KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Transactions with key management personnel were made at arm’s length at normal market prices and normal commercial terms. 
There  were  no  transactions  with  key  management  personnel  for  the  six  months  ended  31  December  2017  other  than  those 
disclosed above.

OPTIONS AFFECTING REMUNERATION

The  terms  and  conditions  of  options  granted  during  the  six  months  ended  31  December  2017  affecting  remuneration  in  the 
current or future reporting periods are as follows:

Grant date

Number 
granted

Expiry 
date/last 
exercise 
date

Fair value 
per option 
at grant 
date

Exercise 
price per 
option

Value of 
options at 
grant date1

Number 
of options 
vested

Vested

Max value 
yet to vest

Directors 

Derek Carter 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Peter Albert 

13/12/17 

1,820,654 

30/06/25 

$0.147 

$1.34 

$268,073 

Pauline Carr 

Richard Crookes 

Jim Dietz 

Owen Hegarty 

Key Management 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Mike Norris 

13/12/17 

800,703 

30/06/25 

$0.147 

$1.34 

$117,896 

2,621,357 

$385,969 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-

$268,073

-

-

-

-

- 

$117,896

$385,969

1 The value at grant date has been calculated in accordance with the models and assumptions as disclosed in note 18.

44

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
KMP EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS

The remuneration arrangements for KMP are formalised in employment agreements. These agreements provide for the payment 
of  fixed  remuneration,  performance  related  STI  bonuses,  other  short  term  benefits,  and  participation,  where  eligible,  in  the 
Company’s LTI Plan.

Executive Director

Mr. Albert is employed under an employment agreement which has no fixed term.  The notice period is three months. Depending 
on the reason for a termination of his employment, Mr. Albert may be entitled to severance benefits of up to 12 months’ cash 
remuneration (based on an average of his previous annual remuneration), or other minimum severance benefits set by Spanish 
law, as applicable. During the six months ended 31 December 2017 Mr. Albert’s total fixed remuneration was $332,376.  The 
Board has determined that with effect from 1 January 2018 the weighting of Mr. Albert’s STI be changed from 75% for corporate 
and strategic KPIs and 25% for personal KPIs to 100% for corporate and strategic KPIs.  Also with effect from 1 January 2018, 
a CPI adjustment of 2% has been applied to Mr. Albert’s annual base salary.  As a result, Mr. Albert’s annual base salary has 
increased from €426,341 per annum to €434,868 per annum.  No other changes have been made to Mr. Albert’s base salary or 
to his short term or long term variable performance based incentives.

Non-Executive Directors

On  appointment  to  the  Board,  each  Non-Executive  Director  enters  into  a  service  agreement  with  the  Group  in  the  form  of  a 
letter of appointment. The letter summarises the Board policies and terms, including compensation, relevant to the Director. The 
aggregate remuneration for Non-Executive Directors has been set at an amount not to exceed $500,000 per annum. This amount 
may only be increased with the approval of Shareholders at a general meeting. The period of appointment is in accordance with 
the Company’s Constitution and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), including the provisions of the constitution which relate to the 
rotation of Directors.

Other Key Management Personnel

Mr. Norris is employed under an employment agreement which has no fixed term.  The notice period is three months. Depending 
on the reason for a termination of his employment, Mr. Norris may be entitled to a payment equal to three months of his annual 
salary. During the six months ended 31 December 2017 Mr. Norris’s total fixed remuneration was $188,932. With effect from 1 
January 2018, a salary adjustment has been made to Mr. Norris’s annual base salary, resulting in an increase from €250,000 per 
annum to €260,000 per annum. No other changes have been made to Mr. Norris’s remuneration.

Directors’ Report

45

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersLOANS TO DIRECTORS AND OTHER KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

There were no loans to Directors or other key management personnel during the six months ended 31 December 2017 (year 
ended 30 June 2017: nil).

VOTING AND COMMENTS MADE AT THE COMPANY’S NOVEMBER 2017 ANNUAL 
GENERAL MEETING

Highfield Resources Limited received more than 99.90% of “yes” votes on its remuneration report for the financial year ended 
30 June 2017.  The Company did not receive any specific feedback at the AGM or during the current period on its remuneration 
practices.

PERFORMANCE MEASURED BY LOSS PER SHARE

The table below shows the performance of the Company measured by loss per share:

Six months 
ended
31 December 
2017 

Year ended 
30 June 2017 

Year ended  
30 June 2016 

Year ended  
30 June 2015 

Year ended    
30 June 2014 

Year ended   
30 June 2013

Loss per share (cents) 

Share price (at period end) 

Share price High for the reporting period 

Share price Low for the reporting period 

(0.14) 

$1.03 

$1.20 

$0.82 

(2.22) 

$0.96 

$1.49 

$0.90 

(3.42) 

$1.38 

$2.04 

$1.03 

(4.38) 

$1.48 

$2.08 

$0.52 

(4.12) 

$0.58 

$0.68 

$0.33 

(4.22)

$0.36

$0.36

$0.13

46

Directors’ Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersEnd of Audited Remuneration Report

Signed on behalf of the Board in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.

Peter Albert 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer
Pamplona, Spain
23 March 2018

Directors’ Report

47

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersFinancial
Report

48

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders49

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersConsolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other 
Comprehensive Income
for the six months ended 31 December 2017

Continuing Operations 

Revenue - interest received 

Gain on foreign exchange 

Listing and share registry expenses 

Professional and consultants’ fees 

Employee costs 

Share-based payments expense 

Travel and accommodation 

Donations 

Depreciation 

Realised loss on derivative financial instrument 

Other expenses 

Loss before income tax 

Income tax expense 

Net loss for the year 

Other comprehensive income 

Items that may be reclassified to profit and loss 

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations 

Other comprehensive income for the period net of tax 

Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the period 

Loss per share 

Basic loss per share (cents)  

Diluted loss per share (cents)  

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

Note

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

7,470 

1,933,428 

(89,762) 

(424,910) 

(1,141,015) 

(314,606) 

(54,564) 

(65,579) 

(60,392) 

- 

(259,731) 

198,888

218,151

(118,668)

(1,204,704)

(1,180,536)

(2,104,245)

(234,447)

(281,568)

(122,697)

(1,931,736)

(320,322)

3 

18 

23 

17(e) 

(469,661) 

(7,081,884) 

5 

- 

-

(469,661) 

(7,081,884)

1,898,112 

1,898,112 

1,428,451 

(0.14) 

(0.14) 

718,072

718,072

(6,363,812)

(2.22)

(2.22)

6 

6 

The above Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the 

accompanying notes.

50

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 
as at 31 December 2017

Current Assets 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Other receivables 

Total Current Assets 

Non-Current Assets 

Investments 

Other receivables 

Property, plant and equipment 

Deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure 

Total Non-Current Assets 

Total Assets 

Current Liabilities 

Trade and other payables 

Total Current Liabilities 

Total Liabilities 

Net Assets 

Equity 

Issued capital 

Reserves 

Accumulated losses 

Total Equity 

Note

31 December 2017
$

30 June 2017
$

7 

8 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

65,576,728 

789,292 

66,366,020 

5,525 

70,899 

154,996 

94,090,220 

94,321,640 

160,687,660 

2,674,217 

2,674,217 

2,674,217 

69,559,873

1,272,773

70,832,646

5,360

-

203,378

86,742,052

86,950,790

157,783,436

1,513,050

1,513,050

1,513,050

158,013,443 

156,270,386 

172,399,841 

22,628,135 

(37,014,533) 

158,013,443 

172,399,841

20,415,417

(36,544,872)

156,270,386

The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

Financial Report

51

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 
for the six months ended 31 December 2017

Year ended 30 June 2017

Issued 
capital
$

Accumulated 
losses
$

Share- 
based 
payments 
reserve
$

Foreign 
exchange 
translation 
reserve
$

Option 
premium 
reserve
$

Total
$

Balance at 1 July 2016 

166,353,807 

(29,462,988) 

17,390,615 

201,485 

1,000 

154,483,919

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

Loss for the period 

Other comprehensive income - foreign currency translation 

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners 

Conversion of options 

Cost of issue 

Share-based payment 

- 

- 

- 

(7,081,884) 

- 

(7,081,884) 

6,085,000 

(38,966) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2,104,245 

- 

718,072 

718,072 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(7,081,884)

718,072

(6,363,812)

6,085,000

(38,966)

2,104,245

Balance at 30 June 2017 

172,399,841 

(36,544,872) 

19,494,860 

919,557 

1,000 

156,270,386

Six months ended 31 December 2017 

Balance at 1 July 2017 

172,399,841 

(36,544,872) 

19,494,860 

919,557 

1,000 

156,270,386

Total comprehensive income for the period 

Loss for the period 

Other comprehensive income - foreign currency translation 

Total comprehensive income for the period 

Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners 

Share-based payment 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(469,661) 

- 

(469,661) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1,898,112 

1,898,112 

- 

314,606 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(469,661)

1,898,112

1,428,451

314,606

Balance at 31 December 2017 

172,399,841 

(37,014,533) 

19,809,466 

2,817,669 

1,000 

158,013,443

The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

52

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows  
for the six months ended 31 December 2017

Cash flows from operating activities 

Payments to suppliers and employees 

Interest received 

Other receipts including GST/VAT received 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

Note

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

(1,634,017) 

(4,761,933)

7,740 

383,249 

206,720

776,128

Net cash used in operating activities                                                 

7 

(1,243,298) 

(3,779,085) 

Cash flows from investing activities 

Purchase of plant and equipment 

Payments for exploration and evaluation expenditure 

Net cash used in investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 

Proceeds from conversion of options 

Payments for share issue costs 

Net cash provided by financing activities 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period 

Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 

7 

(6,608) 

(4,666,667) 

(4,673,275) 

- 

- 

- 

(5,916,573) 

69,559,873 

1,933,428 

65,576,728 

(50,512)

(24,874,724)

(24,925,236)

6,085,000

(38,966)

6,046,034

(22,658,287)

93,931,744

(1,713,584)

69,559,873

The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

Financial Report

53

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements  
for the six months ended 31 December 2017

1. CORPORATE INFORMATION

The financial report of Highfield Resources Limited (“Highfield 
Resources”,  “Highfield”  or  “the  Company”)  for  the  six 
months  ended  31  December  2017  was  authorised  for  issue 
in accordance with a resolution of the Directors on 23 March 
2018.  

In  preparing  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  all 
intercompany  balances  and 
income  and 
expenses and profit and losses resulting from intra-company 
transactions  have  been  eliminated  in  full.  Unrealised  losses 
are also eliminated unless costs cannot be recovered.

transactions, 

The  Company  has  changed  its  financial  year  end  date  from 
30  June  to  31  December  and  this  has  necessitated  the 
presentation of an “annual report” for the six month transitional 
financial  period  ended  31  December  2017. The  comparative 
period disclosures are for the year ended 30 June 2017.

Highfield  is  a  company  limited  by  shares  incorporated  in 
Australia  whose  shares  are  publicly  traded  on  the Australian 
Securities  Exchange.  The  nature  of  the  operations  and  the 
principal  activities  of  the  Company  are  described  in  the 
Directors’ Report.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES

(a) Basis of Preparation

The  financial  statements  are  general  purpose  financial 
statements,  which  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with 
the  requirements  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001,  Australian 
Accounting Standards and other authoritative pronouncements 
of  the  Australian  Accounting  Standards  Board. The  financial 
statements have also been prepared on a historical cost basis. 
The presentation currency is Australian dollars.

(b) Compliance Statement

The  financial  report  complies  with  Australian  Accounting 
Standards, which include Australian equivalents to International 
Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS). Compliance with AIFRS 
ensures  that  the  financial  report,  comprising  the  financial 
statements  and  notes  thereto,  complies  with  International 
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

(c) Basis of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial 
statements  of  Highfield  Resources  Limited  (‘the  Company’) 
and its subsidiaries at 31 December 2017 and at 30 June 2017 
in the comparative period (‘the Group’).

Subsidiaries are those entities over which  the  Company  has 
the power to govern  the  financial  and  operating  policies  so 
as to obtain benefits from their activities. The existence  and 
effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable 
or  convertible  are  considered  when  assessing  whether  a 
Company controls another entity.

(d) Foreign Currency Translation

(i) Functional and presentation currency 

Items  included  in  the  financial  statements  of  each  of  the 
Company’s  controlled  entities  are  measured  using  the 
currency of the primary economic environment  in which  the 
entity  operates  (‘the  functional  currency’).    The  functional 
and  presentation  currency  of  Highfield  Resources  Limited 
is  Australian  dollars. The  functional  currency  of  the  Spanish 
subsidiary is the Euro.

(ii) Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional 
currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the 
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from 
the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at 
period end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities 
denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in profit or 
loss.

(iii) Group entities

The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none 
of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that 
have  a  functional  currency  different  from  the  presentation 
currency  are  translated  into  the  presentation  currency  as 
follows:

_  assets and liabilities for each statement of financial 
    position presented are translated at the closing rate at 
    the date of that statement of financial position;
_  income and expenses for each statement of  profit or 
    loss and other comprehensive income are translated at 
    average exchange rates (unless this is not a reasonable 
    approximation of the rates prevailing on the transaction 
    d a t e s ,  i n  w h i ch  c a s e  i n c o m e  a n d  e x p e n s e s  a r e 
    translated at the dates of the transactions); and
_  all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a
separate component of equity, being the foreign exchange 
translation reserve.

On  consolidation,  exchange  differences  arising  from  the 
translation of any net investment in foreign entities are taken 
to shareholders’ equity.

When  a  foreign  operation  is  sold  or  any  borrowings  forming 
part of the net investment are repaid, a proportionate share of 
such exchange differences is recognised in the statement of 
profit or loss and other comprehensive income, as part of the 
gain or loss on sale where applicable.

54

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders(e) Segment Reporting

For  management  purposes,  the  Group  is  organised  into 
one  main  operating  segment,  which  involves  development 
of  potash  mines  in  Spain.  All  of  the  Group’s  activities  are 
interrelated,  and  discrete  financial  information  is  reported  to 
the Managing Director (Chief Operating Decision Maker) as a 
single segment.

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying 
amount of the asset is increased to the revised estimate of its 
recoverable amount, but only to the extent that the increased 
carrying  amount  does  not  exceed  the  carrying  amount  that 
would  have  been  determined  had  no  impairment  loss  been 
recognised for the asset in previous periods.

Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based upon 
analysis  of  the  Group  as  one  segment. The  financial  results 
from this segment are equivalent to the financial statements 
of the Group as a whole.

Where a decision has been made to proceed with development 
in  respect  of  a  particular  area  of  interest,  the  relevant 
exploration and evaluation asset is tested for impairment and 
the balance is then reclassified to development. 

(f) Changes in accounting policies and 
disclosures

Where  an  area  of  interest  is  abandoned,  any  expenditure 
carried forward in respect of that area is written off.

The  Directors  have  reviewed  all  of  the  new  and  revised 
Standards  and  Interpretations  issued  by  the  AASB  that  are 
relevant  to  the  Group’s  operations  and  effective  for  future 
reporting  periods.  It  has  been  determined  by  the  Directors 
that there is no impact, material or otherwise, of the new and 
revised  Standards  and  Interpretations  on  the  Company,  and 
therefore  no  change  will  be  necessary  to  Group  accounting 
policies.

(g) Exploration and evaluation expenditure

Exploration  and  evaluation  expenditures  in  relation  to  each 
separate area of interest are recognised as an exploration and 
evaluation asset in the period in which they are incurred where 
the following conditions are satisfied:

(i) the rights to tenure of the area of interest are current; and

(ii) at least one of the following conditions is also met:

(a) the exploration and evaluation expenditures are expected
to  be  recouped  through  successful  development  and 
exploitation of the area of interest, or alternatively, by its
sale; or

(b) exploitation and  evaluation  activities in the  area of
interest  have  not  at  the  balance  date  reached  a  stage 
which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence 
or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves, and 
active and significant operations in, or in relation to, the 
area of interest are continuing.

Exploration  and  evaluation  assets  are  initially  measured  at 
cost  and  include  acquisition  of  rights  to  explore,  studies, 
exploratory  drilling,  trenching  and  sampling  and  associated 
activities and an allocation of depreciation and amortisation of 
assets  used  in  exploration  and  evaluation  activities.  General 
and administrative costs are only included in the measurement 
of  exploration  and  evaluation  costs  where  they  are  related 
directly to operational activities in a particular area of interest.

Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment 
when  facts  and  circumstances  suggest  that  the  carrying 
amount  of  an  exploration  and  evaluation  asset  may  exceed 
its  recoverable  amount.  The  recoverable  amount  of  the 
exploration  and  evaluation  asset  (for  the  cash  generating 
unit(s) to which it has been allocated being no larger than the 
relevant area of interest) is estimated to determine the extent 
of the impairment loss (if any).

(h) Income Tax

The  income  tax  expense  or  benefit  for  the  period  is  the  tax 
payable or receivable on the current period’s taxable income 
or  loss  based  on  the  applicable  income  tax  rate  for  each 
jurisdiction  adjusted  by  changes  in  deferred  tax  assets  and 
liabilities attributable to temporary differences and to unused 
tax losses.

The  current  income  tax  charge  is  calculated  on  the  basis  of 
the  tax  laws  enacted  or  substantively  enacted  at  the  end  of 
the  reporting  period.  Management  periodically  evaluates 
positions  taken  in  tax  returns  with  respect  to  situations  in 
which  applicable  tax  regulation  is  subject  to  interpretation. 
It  establishes  provisions  where  appropriate  on  the  basis  of 
amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities.

Current  tax  assets  and  liabilities  for  the  current  and  prior 
periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered 
from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax 
laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted 
or substantively enacted by the balance date.

Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences 
at  the  balance  date  between  the  tax  bases  of  assets  and 
liabilities  and  their  carrying  amounts  for  financial  reporting 
purposes.

Deferred  income  tax  liabilities  are  recognised  for  all  taxable 
temporary differences except when:

_  the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial
recognition  of  goodwill  or  of  an  asset  or  liability  in  a 
transaction that is not a business combination and that, at 
the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting 
profit nor taxable profit or loss; or

_ the  taxable  temporary  difference  is  associated  with
investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests in joint
ventures, and the timing of the reversal of the temporary
difference  can  be  controlled  and  it  is  probable  that  the
temporary  difference  will  not  reverse  in  the  foreseeable
future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible 
temporary  differences  and  the  carry-forward  of  unused  tax 
assets and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable 
that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible 
temporary  differences  and  the  carry-forward  of  unused  tax 
credits and unused tax losses can be utilised, except when:

Financial Report

55

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders_  the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible
deductible  temporary  difference  arises  from  the  initial 
recognition  of  an  asset  or  liability  in  a  transaction  that 
is  not  a  business  combination  and,  at  the  time  of  the 
transaction,  affects  neither  the  accounting  profit  nor 
taxable profit or loss; or

_  the deductible temporary difference is associated with
investments  in  subsidiaries,  associates  or  interests 
in  joint  ventures,  in  which  case  a  deferred  tax  asset  is 
only  recognised  to  the  extent  that  it  is  probable  that 
the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable 
future  and  taxable  profit  will  be  available  against  which 
the temporary difference can be recognised.The carrying 
amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each 
balance date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer 
probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to 
allow  all  or  part  of  the  deferred  income  tax  asset  to  be 
recognised.

Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at 
each  balance  date  and  are  recognised  to  the  extent  that  it 
has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the 
deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred  income  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  measured  at 
the  tax  rates  that  are  expected  to  apply  to  the  period  when 
the asset is recognised or the liability is settled, based on tax 
rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively 
enacted at the balance date.

Income  taxes  relating  to  items  recognised  directly  in  equity 
are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset only 
if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets 
against current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and 
liabilities  relate  to  the  same  taxable  entity  and  the  same 
taxation authority.

(i) Other taxes

Revenues,  expenses  and  assets  are  recognised  net  of  the 
amount  of  GST/VAT,  except  where  the  amount  of  GST/VAT 
incurred  is  not  recoverable  from  the  government.  In  these 
circumstances the GST/VAT is recognised as part of the cost 
of acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of the expense. 
Receivables and payables in the statement of financial position 
are shown inclusive of GST/VAT.

The net amount of GST/VAT recoverable from, or payable to, 
the government is included as part of receivables or payables in 
the statement of financial position. Cash flows are presented 
in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis, except that 
the GST/VAT component of investing and financing activities, 
which  is  receivable  from  or  payable  to  the  government,  is 
disclosed as operating cash flows.

recoverable  amount.  An  asset’s  recoverable  amount  is  the 
higher  of  its  fair  value  less  costs  to  sell  and  its  value  in  use 
and  is  determined  for  an  individual  asset,  unless  the  asset 
does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent 
of those from other assets or group of assets and the asset’s 
value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value. 
In  such  cases  the  asset  is  tested  for  impairment  as  part 
of  the  cash-  generating  unit  to  which  it  belongs. When  the 
carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds 
its  recoverable  amount,  the  asset  or  cash-generating  unit  is 
considered  impaired  and  is  written  down  to  its  recoverable 
amount.

In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are 
discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate 
that  reflects  current  market  assessments  of  the  time  value 
of  money  and  the  risks  specific  to  the  asset.  Impairment 
losses  relating  to  continuing  operations  are  recognised  in 
those expense categories consistent with the function of the 
impaired asset unless the asset is carried at revalued amount 
(in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation 
decrease).

An  assessment  is  also  made  at  each  balance  date  as  to 
whether  there  is  any  indication  that  previously  recognised 
impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. 
If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated.  
A  previously  recognised  impairment  loss  is  reversed  only  if 
there has been a change in the estimates used to determine 
the asset’s recoverable amount since the last impairment loss 
was recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the 
asset  is  increased  to  its  recoverable  amount. That  increased 
amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have 
been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss 
been recognised for the asset in prior periods.

Such reversal is recognised in profit or loss unless the asset 
is  carried  at  revalued  amount,  in  which  case  the  reversal  is 
treated  as  a  revaluation  increase.  After  such  a  reversal  the 
depreciation  charge  is  adjusted  in  future  periods  to  allocate 
the  asset’s  revised  carrying  amount,  less  any  residual  value, 
on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.

(k) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash comprises cash at bank and in hand.  Cash equivalents 
are  short  term,  highly  liquid  investments  that  are  readily 
convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject 
to an insignificant risk of changes in value. Bank overdrafts are 
shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the statement 
of financial position.

For  the  purposes  of  the  statement  of  cash  flows,  cash  and 
cash  equivalents  consist  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  as 
defined above, net of outstanding bank overdrafts.

(j)  Impairment  of  non-financial  assets  other 
than goodwill

The  Company  assesses  at  each  balance  date  whether  there 
is  an  indication  that  an  asset  may  be  impaired.  If  any  such 
indication  exists,  or  when  annual  impairment  testing  for  an 
asset is required, the group makes an estimate of the asset’s 

(l) Trade and other payables

Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised cost 
and represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the 
Group prior to the end of the period that are unpaid and arise 
when the Group becomes obliged to make future payments in 
respect of the purchase of these goods and services.

56

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders(m) Derivative financial instruments and 
hedging

The  Group  uses  derivative  financial  instruments  to  hedge 
its  risks  associated  with  foreign  currency  fluctuations.  Such 
derivative  financial  instruments  are  initially  recognised  at  fair 
value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into 
and  are  subsequently  remeasured  to  fair  value.    Derivatives 
are carried as assets when their fair value is positive and as 
liabilities when their fair value is negative. Any gains or losses 
arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives are taken 
directly to net profit or loss for the period.

(n) Provisions

Provisions  are  recognised  when  the  Group  has  a  present 
obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it 
is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic 
benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable 
estimate  can  be  made  of  the  amount  of  the  obligation. 
Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.

When  the  Group  expects  some  or  all  of  a  provision  to  be 
reimbursed,  for  example  under  an  insurance  contract,  the 
reimbursement  is  recognised  as  a  separate  asset  but  only 
when  the  reimbursement  is  virtually  certain.  The  expense 
relating  to  any  provision  is  presented  in  the  statement  of 
comprehensive income net of any reimbursement.

Provisions are measured at the present value or management’s 
best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present 
obligation at the end of the reporting period.

If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions 
are  discounted  using  a  current  pre-tax  rate  that  reflects 
the  risks  specific  to  the  liability. When  discounting  is  used, 
the  increase  in  the  provision  due  to  the  passage  of  time  is 
recognised as an interest expense.

(o) Issued capital

Ordinary  shares  are  classified  as  equity.  Incremental  costs 
directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are 
shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. 
Incremental  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  issue  of  new 
shares  or  options  for  the  acquisition  of  a  new  business  are 
not included in the cost of acquisition as part of the purchase 
consideration.

(p) Revenue

Revenue  is  measured  at  the  fair  value  of  the  consideration 
received or receivable. Amounts disclosed as revenue are net 
of  returns,  trade  allowances,  rebates  and  amounts  collected 
on behalf of third parties. Revenue is recognised to the extent 
that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the 
Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. The following 
specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue 
is recognised:

Interest income

Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis 
that  takes  into  account  the  effective  yield  on  the  financial 
asset.

(q) Earnings per share

Basic  earnings/loss  per  share  is  calculated  as  net  profit/loss 
attributable  to  members,  adjusted  to  exclude  any  costs  of 
servicing  equity  (other  than  dividends)  and  preference  share 
dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary 
shares, adjusted for any bonus element.

Diluted  earnings  per  share  is  calculated  as  net  profit/loss 
attributable to members, adjusted for:

_ costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and

preference share dividends; 

_  the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated
with  dilutive  potential  ordinary  shares  that  have  been
recognised as expenses; and

_  other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses
during  the  period  that  would  result  from  the  dilution  of
potential ordinary shares;

divided  by  the  weighted  average  number  of  ordinary  shares 
and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus 
element.

(r) Share-based payment transactions

(i) Equity settled transactions:

The  Company  provides  benefits  to  individuals  acting  as,  and 
providing services similar to, employees (including Directors) 
of  the  Company  in  the  form  of  share-based  payment 
transactions, whereby individuals render services in exchange 
for shares or rights over shares (‘equity settled transactions’). 
There  is  currently  an  Employee  Long  Term  Incentive  Plan 
(“ELTIP”)  in  place,  which  provides  benefits  to  Directors  and 
individuals providing services similar to those provided by an 
employee.

The cost of these equity settled transactions with employees 
is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which 
they  are  granted. The  fair  value  is  determined  by  using  the 
binomial  method  (which  is  derived  from  the  Black-Scholes 
option  pricing  model  but  is  considered  more  suitable  for 
companies  which  do  not  pay  dividends),  taking  into  account 
the  terms  and  conditions  upon  which  the  instruments  were 
granted, as discussed in note 18. The expected price volatility 
is based on the historic volatility of the Company’s share price 
on the ASX.

In valuing equity settled transactions, no account is taken of 
any  performance  conditions,  other  than  conditions  linked  to 
the price of the shares of Highfield Resources Limited (‘market 
conditions’).

The  cost  of  the  equity  settled  transactions  is  recognised, 
together  with  a  corresponding  increase  in  equity,  over  the 
period  in  which  the  performance  conditions  are  fulfilled, 
ending on the date on which the relevant employees become 
fully entitled to the award (‘vesting date’).

The  cumulative  expense  recognised  for  equity  settled 
transactions at each reporting date until vesting date reflects (i) 
the extent to which the vesting period has expired and (ii) the 
number of awards that, in the opinion of the Directors of the 
Company, will ultimately vest. This opinion is formed based on 

Financial Report

57

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholdersthe best available information at balance date. No adjustment is 
made for the likelihood of the market performance conditions 
being met as the effect of these conditions is included in the 
determination of fair value at grant date. The charge or credit 
to  profit  or  loss  for  a  period  represents  the  movement  in 
cumulative  expense  recognised  at  the  beginning  and  end  of 
the period.

No  expense  is  recognised  for  awards  that  do  not  ultimately 
vest,  except  for  awards  where  vesting  is  conditional  upon  a 
market condition. Where the terms of an equity settled award 
are  modified,  as  a  minimum  an  expense  is  recognised  as  if 
the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is 
recognised for any increase in the value of the transaction as 
a  result  of  the  modification,  as  measured  at  the  date  of  the 
modification. 

Where an equity settled award is cancelled, it is treated as if 
it had vested on the date of the cancellation, and any expense 
not yet recognised for the award is recognised immediately. 
However if a new award is substituted for the cancelled award, 
and designated as a replacement award on the date that it is 
granted,  the  cancelled  and  new  award  are  treated  as  if  they 
were a modification of the original award, as described in the 
previous paragraph.

The  cost  of  equity-settled  transactions  with  non-employees 
is  measured  by  reference  to  the  fair  value  of  goods  and 
services  received  unless  this  cannot  be  measured  reliably, 
in  which  case  the  cost  is  measured  by  reference  to  the  fair 
value of the equity instruments granted. The dilutive effect, if 
any, of outstanding options is reflected in the computation of 
earnings/loss per share (refer to note 6).

(ii) Cash settled transactions:

The  Company  may  also  provide  benefits  to  employees  in 
the  form  of  cash-settled  share-based  payments,  whereby 
employees render services in exchange for cash, the amounts 
of  which  are  determined  by  reference  to  movements  in  the 
price of the shares of the Company.

The  cost  of  cash-settled  transactions  is  measured  initially 
at  fair  value  at  the  grant  date  using  the  binomial  method  
taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the 
instruments  were  granted. This  fair  value  is  expensed  over 
the  period  until  vesting  with  recognition  of  a  corresponding 
liability. The liability is remeasured to fair value at each balance 
date up to and including the settlement date with changes in 
fair value recognised in profit or loss.

(s) Critical accounting estimates and 
judgements

The  application  of  accounting  policies  requires  the  use  of 
judgements, estimates and assumptions about carrying values 
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other 
sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based 
on historical experience and other factors that are considered 
to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an 
ongoing basis.  Revisions are recognised in the period in which 
the estimate is revised if it affects only that financial period, or 
in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision 
affects both current and future periods.

58

Financial Report

Exploration and evaluation expenditure

The application of the Group’s accounting policy for exploration 
and evaluation expenditure requires judgment in determining 
whether future economic benefits are likely either from future 
exploitation  or  sale  or  where  activities  have  not  reached  a 
stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence 
of  reserves.    The  determination  of  a  Joint  Ore  Reserves 
Committee  (JORC)  resource  is  itself  an  estimation  process 
that requires varying degrees of uncertainty depending on sub-
classification and these estimates directly impact the point of 
deferral of exploration and evaluation expenditure. The deferral 
policy  requires  management  to  make  certain  estimates 
and  assumptions  about  future  events  or  circumstances,  in 
particular whether an economically viable extraction operation 
can  be  established.  Estimates  and  assumptions  made  may 
change if new information becomes available.

Share-based payment transactions

The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions 
and  cash-settled  share-based  payments  with  employees 
and  third  parties  by  reference  to  the  fair  value  of  the  equity 
instruments  at  the  date  at  which  they  are  granted. The  fair 
value  of  the  options  at  the  grant  date  is  determined  using 
the  binomial  method  taking  into  account  the  terms  and 
conditions upon which the instruments were granted and the 
assumptions detailed in note 18.

(t) New and amended standards adopted by 
the Group

No  new  or  amended  standards  were  adopted  by  the  Group 
during the period.

(u) New standards and interpretations not yet 
adopted

A  number  of  new  standards,  amendments  to  standards 
and  interpretations  issued  by  the  AASB  which  are  not  yet 
mandatorily  applicable  to  the  Group  have  not  been  applied 
in  preparing  these  consolidated  financial  statements. Those 
which  may  be  relevant  to  the  Group  are  set  out  below. The 
Group does not plan to adopt these standards early.

_    AASB  9  Financial  Instruments  and  associated  Amending
reporting  period 

for  annual 

Standards 
commencing 1 January 2018)

(applicable 

The  Standard  will  be  applicable  retrospectively  and 
includes  revised  requirements  for  the  classification  and 
measurement of financial instruments, revised recognition 
and  derecognition  requirements  for  financial  instruments 
and  simplified  requirements  for  hedge  accounting.  Key 
changes made to this standard that may affect the Group 
on  initial  application  include  certain  simplifications  to  the 
classification  of  financial  assets,  simplifications  to  the 
accounting  of  embedded  derivatives,  and  the  irrevocable 
election  to  recognise  gains  and  losses  on  investments  in 
equity  instruments  that  are  not  held  for  trading  in  other 
comprehensive  income. The  Directors  anticipate  that  the 
adoption of AASB 9 will not have a material impact on the 
Group’s financial statements.

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders_  AASB  15  Revenue  from  Contracts  with  Customers
(applicable  to  annual  reporting  periods  commencing  on  or 
after 1 January 2018).

When  effective,  this  Standard  will  replace  the  current 
accounting  requirements  applicable  to  revenue  with  a 
single, principles-based model. Except for a limited number 
of exceptions, including leases, the new revenue model in 
AASB 15 will apply to all contracts with customers as well 
as non-monetary exchanges between entities in the same 
line of business to facilitate sales to customers and potential 
customers.

The  core  principle  of  the  Standard  is  that  an  entity  will 
recognise revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods 
or  services  to  customers  in  an  amount  that  reflects  the 
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in 
exchange for the goods or services. To achieve this objective, 
AASB 15 provides the following five step process:

- identify the contract(s) with a customer;

- identify the performance obligations in the contract(s);

- determine the transaction price;

- allocate the transaction price to the performance

obligations in the contract(s); and

- recognise revenue when (or as) the performance

obligations are satisfied.

This Standard will require retrospective restatement, as well 
as  enhanced  disclosures  regarding  revenue. The  Directors 
anticipate  that  the  adoption  of  AASB  15  will  not  have  a 
material  impact  on  the  Group’s  revenue  recognition  and 
disclosures.

_  AASB  16  Leases  (applicable  to  annual  reporting  periods

commencing on or after 1 January 2019).

AASB  16  removes  the  classification  of  leases  as  either 
operating leases or finance leases for the lessee, effectively 
treating all leases as finance leases. Short term leases (less 
than 12 months) and leases of a low value are exempt from 
the  lease  accounting  requirements.  Lessor  accounting 
remains similar to current practice. The Directors anticipate 
that the adoption of AASB 16 will not have a material impact 
on the Group’s financial statements.

_ Other standards not yet applicable

There are no other standards that are not yet effective and 
that  would  be  expected  to  have  a  material  impact  on  the 
Group  in  the  current  or  future  reporting  periods  and  on 
foreseeable future transactions.

Financial Report

59

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders3. EXPENSES

Professional and consultants’ fees 

Consulting and Directors’ fees 

Corporate advisory fees 

Legal fees 

Other 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

(302,622) 

 (39,079) 

(29,680) 

(53,529) 

(424,910) 

(973,073)

(15,329)

(124,644)

(91,658)

(1,204,704)

4. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION

The auditor of Highfield Resources Limited is HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) 

Amounts received or due and receivable by the parent auditor for:

- an audit or review of the financial report 

30,000 

38,000

The auditor of Geoalcali SL is Bové Montero Y Asociados, an affiliate firm of HLB International 

Amounts received or due and receivable by the subsidiary auditor for: 

- an audit or review of the financial report 

5. INCOME TAX

a) Income tax expense

Major component of tax expense for the year: 

Current tax 

Deferred tax 

30,036 

60,036 

24,334

62,334

- 

- 

- 

-

-

-

(b) Numerical reconciliation between aggregate tax expense recognised in the statement of 
profit or loss and other comprehensive income and tax expense calculated per the statutory 
income tax rate.

A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting loss before income tax multiplied by the Company’s applicable 
tax rate is as follows: 

Loss from continuing operations before income tax expense 

Tax at the Australian rate of 27.5% 

Share-based payments 

Non-deductible expenses 

Non-assessable income 

Income tax benefit not brought to account 

Income tax expense  

60

Financial Report

(469,661) 

(129,157) 

86,517 

19,166 

(533,007) 

556,481 

- 

(7,081,884)

(1,947,518)

578,667

-

-

1,368,851

-

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(c) Deferred tax

The following deferred tax balances have not been bought to account: 

Liabilities 

Total exploration and evaluation expenditure 

Offset by deferred tax assets 

Deferred  tax liability recognised 

Assets 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

- 

- 

- 

-

-

-

Losses available to offset against future taxable income 

9,189,951 

9,091,323

Share issue costs deductible over five years 

Accrued expenses 

Deferred tax assets offset against deferred tax liabilities 

Net deferred tax asset not recognised 

(d) Unused tax losses 

Unused tax losses  

Potential tax benefit not recognised at 27.5% 

The benefit for tax losses will only be obtained if:

- 

- 

- 

-

-

-

9,189,951 

9,091,323

33,418,005 

9,189,951 

33,059,358

9,091,323

i.   the  Company  derives  future  assessable  income  of  a  nature  and  of  an  amount  sufficient  to  enable  the  benefit  from  the

 deductions for the losses to be realised;

ii.   the Company continues to comply with the conditions for deductibility imposed by tax legislation; and

iii.  no changes in tax legislation adversely affect the Company in realising the benefit from the deductions for the losses.

The balances in notes 5(c) and 5(d) for the current period include the losses available to offset against future taxable income for 
the Company’s Spanish subsidiary as well as for the Company itself.  The comparative information for the year ended 30 June 
2017 has been amended to be consistent with the current period.

6. LOSS PER SHARE

Loss used in calculating basic and diluted EPS 

(469,661) 

(7,081,884)

Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic loss per share 

329,225,003 

319,455,861

Effect of dilution: 

Share options 

- 

-

Adjusted weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating diluted loss per share 

329,225,003 

319,455,861

Number of Shares

There is no impact from 51,007,221 options outstanding at 31 December 2017 (30 June 2017: 44,675,000) on the earnings per 
share calculation because they are anti-dilutive. These options could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future. There have been no 
transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares that would significantly change the number of ordinary shares 
or potential ordinary shares outstanding between 31 December 2017 and the date of completion of these financial statements.

Financial Report

61

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
7. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Reconciliation of cash

Cash at bank 

Reconciliation of operating loss after tax to net cash flow from operations 

Loss after tax 

Non-cash and non-operating items in operating loss after tax: 

Share-based payments 

Net (gain)/loss on foreign exchange 

Depreciation 

Change in assets and liabilities 

Decrease in trade and other receivables 

Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables 

Net cash used in operating activities 

8. OTHER RECEIVABLES

Current

GST receivable 

VAT receivable 

Other 

Non-current 

Guarantees 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

65,576,728 

69,559,873

(469,661) 

(7,081,884)

314,606 

(1,933,428) 

60,392 

412,299 

372,494 

(1,243,298) 

39,686 

80,660 

668,946 

789,292 

70,899 

70,899 

2,104,245

1,713,584

122,697

440,888

(1,078,615)

(3,779,085)

23,233

466,096

783,444

1,272,773

-

-

GST/VAT receivable and other receivables are non-interest bearing and generally receivable on 30 day terms. They are neither 
past due nor impaired. The amount is fully collectible. Due to the short term nature of these receivables, their carrying value is 
assumed to approximate their fair value. Other receivables mainly represent guarantees provided to third parties.

62

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
9. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation and impairment 

Net carrying amount 

Movements in Plant & Equipment:

Opening balance 

Additions 

Net exchange differences on translation 

Depreciation charge for the period 

Closing balance 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

533,543 

(378,547) 

154,996 

203,378 

6,608 

5,402 

(60,392) 

154,996 

511,185

(307,807)

203,378

326,009

50,512

(50,446)

(122,697)

203,378

10. DEFERRED EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE

Exploration and Evaluation phase - at cost 

Opening balance 

Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred during the period 

Net exchange differences on translation 

Closing balance 

86,742,052 

5,455,341 

1,892,827 

94,090,220 

63,022,168

23,804,905

(85,021)

86,742,052

The  ultimate  recoupment  of  costs  carried  forward  for  exploration  and  evaluation  expenditure  is  dependent  on  the  successful 
development and commercial exploitation or sale of the respective mining areas.

11. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES

Trade payables 

Other payables 

Accruals 

844,665 

33,789 

1,795,763 

2,674,217 

903,595

16,852

592,603

1,513,050

Trade payables, other payables and accruals are non-interest bearing and generally payable on 30 day terms. Due to the short term 
nature of these payables, their carrying value is assumed to approximate their fair value.

Financial Report

63

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
12. ISSUED CAPITAL

(a) Issued and paid up capital

Issued and fully paid 

(b) Movements in ordinary shares on issue

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

172,399,841 

172,399,841

31 December  2017
(6 months)

30 June 2017
(12 months)

Number of shares

$

Number of shares

$

Opening Balance 

329,225,003 

172,399,841 

310,825,003 

166,353,807

Shares issued upon conversion of unlisted options1 

Transaction costs on share issue 

- 

- 

- 

- 

18,400,000 

- 

6,085,000

(38,966)

329,225,003 

172,399,841 

329,225,003 

172,399,841

1 December 2017
_  No shares were issued during the six months ended 31 December 2017.
June 2017
_  4,000,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.20, expiring on 19 October 2016.
_  4,400,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.20, expiring on 1 November 2016.
_  1,100,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.30, expiring on 31 January 2017.
_  7,000,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.40, expiring on 31 May 2017.
_  500,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.60, expiring on 31 January 2017.
_  500,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.60, expiring on 30 June 2017.
_  900,000 shares were issued upon conversion of unlisted options exercisable at $0.75, expiring on 30 June 2018.

(c) Ordinary shares

The Company does not have authorised capital nor par value in respect of its issued capital. Ordinary shares have the right to 
receive dividends as declared and, in the event of a winding up of the Company, to participate in the proceeds from sale of all 
surplus assets in proportion to the number of and amounts paid up on shares held.  Ordinary shares entitle their holder to one 
vote, either in person or proxy, at a meeting of the Company.

(d) Capital risk management

The Company’s capital comprises share capital and reserves less accumulated losses amounting to a net equity of $158,013,443 
at 31 December 2017.  The Company manages its capital to ensure its ability to continue as a going concern and to optimise returns 
to its shareholders. The Company was ungeared at period end and not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements. 
Refer to note 17 for further information on the Company’s financial risk management policies.

64

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
(e) Share Options

As at the date of this report there were 51,007,221 unissued ordinary shares under options. The details of the options are as 
follows:

Number

3,350,000    

9,500,000   

750,000 

4,000,000   

4,832,221   

1,500,000   

5,350,000   

17,175,000  

4,550,000   

51,007,221  

Exercise Price $

$0.75 

 $0.75 

 $1.00 

$1.25 

$1.34 

$1.85 

$1.85 

$2.00 

$2.50 

Expiry Date

 30 June 2018

 11 September 2018

 30 June 2018

30 June 2018

30 June 2025

30 June 2024

18 November 2024

30 June 2019

30 June 2019

No option holder has any right under the options to participate in any other share issue of the Company or any other entity. The 
following options were issued during the six month period:

_ 4,832,221 options with an exercise price of $1.34, expiring on 30 June 2025
_ 1,500,000 options with an exercise price of $1.85, expiring on 30 June 2024

No options were exercised or lapsed during the six month period.
For full details refer to note 18.

(f) Performance Shares

As at 30 June 2017 there were 50,000,000 Class B performance shares on issue. On 18 October 2017 all Class B performance 
shares lapsed without having met the conditions for conversion. For full details refer to note 13.

Financial Report

65

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
13. RESERVES

Share-based payments reserve 

Foreign exchange translation reserve 

Option premium reserve 

Performance share reserve 

Movements in Reserves

Share-based payments reserve 

Opening balance 

Share-based payments expense 

Closing balance 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

19,809,466 

2,817,669 

1,000 

- 

19,494,860

919,557

1,000

-

22,628,135 

20,415,417

19,494,860 

314,606 

19,809,466 

17,390,615

2,104,245

19,494,860

The share-based payment reserve is used to record the value of equity benefits provided to Directors and executives as part of 
their remuneration and non-employees for their goods and services. Refer to note 18 for further details of the securities issued 
during the six months ended 31 December 2017.

Foreign exchange translation reserve 

Opening balance 

Foreign exchange translation difference 

Closing balance 

919,557 

1,898,112 

2,817,669 

201,485

718,072

919,557

The foreign exchange differences arising on translation of foreign controlled entities are taken to the foreign exchange translation 
reserve.

Option premium reserve 

Opening balance 

Issue of unlisted options 

Closing balance 

1,000 

- 

1,000 

The option premium reserve is used to record the amount received on the issue of unlisted options.

Performance share reserve 

Opening balance 

Movement in the period 

Closing balance 

- 

- 

- 

1,000

-

1,000

-

-

-

The performance share reserve was used to record the value of performance shares issued to KCL shareholders for the acquisition 
of  the  Company’s  Spanish  potash  projects  at  $0.23  per  share  based  on  the  Directors’  assessment  of  the  likelihood  of  the 
performance shares being converted to ordinary shares. All Class A performance shares were converted in 2015. The remaining 
balance at 30 June 2015 of $11,500,000 represented 50,000,000 Class B performance shares issued at $0.23 per share on the 
basis that they would be converted to ordinary shares upon the receipt, to the reasonable satisfaction of Highfield of all referral 
approvals  required  to  construct  and  operate  a  500,000  tonne  per  annum  potash  mine  on  the  Project  (including  all  required 
government approvals, water and energy contracts necessary to operate the mine) prior to 18 October 2017, being the expiry date 
of the performance shares.

During the year ended 30 June 2016 a fair value adjustment was made to reduce the performance share reserve balance to nil, 
based on the Directors’ assessment that the Class B performance shares were unlikely to be converted. On 18 October 2017 all 
Class B performance shares lapsed without having met the conditions for conversion.

66

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
14. ACCUMULATED LOSSES

Movements in accumulated losses were as follows: 

Opening balance 

Loss for the period 

Closing balance 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

(36,544,872) 

(469,661) 

(37,014,533) 

(29,462,988)

(7,081,884)

(36,544,872)

15. DIRECTORS AND OTHER KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL DISCLOSURES
Remuneration of Directors and Other Key Management Personnel

Details of the emoluments of the Directors and other key management personnel of the Company for the period are as follows:

Short term employee benefits 

Share-based payments 

Total 

1,546,274 

385,969 

1,932,243 

2,168,421

767,643

2,936,064

Key management personnel are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling 
the major activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Director (whether executive or otherwise) of the Group. 

16. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES

(a) Key management personnel

Please refer to note 15 “Directors and Other Key Management Personnel Disclosures”.

(b) Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Highfield Resources Limited and the subsidiaries listed 
in the following table:

Name of Entity

KCL Resources Limited 

Geoalcali SL 

Equity Holding

Country of Incorporation

31 December 
2017

30 June 2017

Australia 

Spain 

100% 

100% 

100%

100%

Financial Report

67

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
17. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
Exposure to foreign currency risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk arises in the normal course of the Company’s 
business. The Company uses different methods as discussed below to manage risks that arise from these financial instruments. 
The objective is to support the delivery of the financial targets while protecting future financial security.

(a) Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities. The 
Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining sufficient cash facilities to meet the operating requirements of the business and 
investing excess funds in highly liquid short term investments. The responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the 
Board of Directors.

Alternatives for sourcing future capital needs include the Company’s cash position and the issue of equity instruments, as well as 
debt financing. These alternatives are evaluated to determine the optimal mix of capital resources for capital needs. The Directors 
expect that present levels of liquidity along with future capital raising will be adequate to meet expected capital needs.

Maturity analysis for financial liabilities

Financial liabilities of the Company comprise trade and other payables.

(b) Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair value of financial 
instruments. The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes to interest rate risk relates primarily to its earnings on cash and 
term deposits. The Company manages the risk by investing in short term deposits.

By  30  June  2017  the  Company  had  converted  substantially  all  of  its  cash  and  cash  equivalents  into  Euros,  being  the  primary 
currency in which it expects to make expenditure for the development of the Muga Mine. As a result the Company’s interest 
income decreased from $2.4m in the year ended 30 June 2016 to $0.2m in the year ended 30 June 2017 and only $7,470 in the 
six months ended 31 December 2017, reflecting the fact that interest rates on Euro balances are negligible.

Interest rate sensitivity

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity of the Company’s statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income 
to a reasonably possible change in interest rates, with all other variables constant.

Increase 75 basis points 

Decrease 75 basis points 

Effect on Post Tax Loss ($)
Increase/(decrease)

Effect on Equity incl. accumulated 
losses ($) Increase/(decrease)

31 December 2017
(6 months)

30 June 2017
(12 months)

31 December 2017
(6 months)

30 June 2017
(12 months)

14,407 

(7,470) 

23,431 

(23,431) 

14,407 

(7,470) 

23,431

(23,431)

A sensitivity of 75 basis points has been used as this is considered reasonable given the current level of both short term and 
long  term  Australian  Dollar  interest  rates. The  change  in  basis  points  is  derived  from  a  review  of  historical  movements  and 
management’s judgement of future trends.

(c) Credit Risk Exposures

Credit risk represents the risk that the counterparty to the financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the 
Company to incur a financial loss. The Company’s maximum credit exposure is the carrying amounts on the statement of financial 
position. The Company holds financial instruments with credit worthy third parties.  At 31 December 2017, 99% of the Company’s 
cash and cash equivalents were held in financial institutions with a rating from Standard & Poors of AA or above (long term). The 
Company had no past due or impaired debtors as at 31 December 2017.

68

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders(d) Foreign Currency Risk

The Company undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies, hence exposures to exchange rate fluctuations 
arise. Exchange rate  exposures are managed within approved policy parameters utilising  forward foreign  exchange contracts. 
The carrying amounts of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the balance date 
expressed in Australian dollars were as follows:

Euro 

US dollars 

GB pounds 

Canadian dollars 

Total 

Liabilities ($)

Assets ($)

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

31 December 2017

30 June 2017

2,245,829 

1,373,424 

63,723,750 

66,888,789

58,315 

12,277 

170,232 

2.486.653 

56,583 

7,796 

- 

12,733 

13,059

- 

- 

-

-

1,437,803 

63,736,483 

66,901,848

The  monetary  assets  and  liabilities  in  the  table  above  for  the  current  period  include  the  balances  of  the  Company’s  Spanish 
subsidiary as well as for the Company itself.  The comparative information for the year ended 30 June 2017 has been amended to 
be consistent with the current period.

Foreign currency sensitivity analysis

The Company is exposed to Euro currency fluctuations. The following table details the Group’s sensitivity to a 10% increase and 
decrease in the Euro against the Australian dollar on the above foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, 
expressed in Australian dollars.

31 December 2017 

Profit or loss 

Other equity  

30 June 2017 

Profit or loss 

Other equity  

(e) Fair Value

Euro Movement

Increase ($)

Decrease ($)

6,805,535 

6,805,535 

7,273,783 

7,273,783 

(5,568,165)

(5,568,165)

(5,951,277)

(5,951,277)

The carrying amounts of current receivables and current payables are considered to be a reasonable approximation of their fair 
value. The Company did not hold any financial instruments measured at fair value at 30 June 2017 or 31 December 2017.  During 
the  year  ended  30  June  2017  the  Company  incurred  a  realised  loss  of  $1,931,736  as  a  result  of  closing  a  foreign  exchange 
derivative used to hedge against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations.

Financial Report

69

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
18. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS 

Share-based payment transactions recognised as operational expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other 
Comprehensive Income during the period were as follows:

Options granted during the period 

Options granted in prior periods 

31 December  2017
(6 months)
$

119,318 

195,288 

314,606 

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

1,775,100

329,145

2,104,245

The Company previously operated an employee share option plan (“ESOP”). Under this plan executive officers, employees and 
eligible contractors of Highfield Resources Limited were granted options and could nominate a relative or associate to receive 
the  options.    On  18  November  2016,  the  Company’s  shareholders  approved  a  new  equity  incentive  plan  known  as  ´Highfield 
Resources  Limited  Employee  Long Term  Incentive  Plan’  (“ELTIP”)  and  the  issue  of  securities  under  the  ELTIP.  Subject  to  the 
attainment of performance hurdles and vesting conditions participants in this plan may receive options. The objective of this plan 
is to assist in the recruitment, reward, retention and motivation of senior managers and consultants. The fair value at grant date of 
options granted during the period was determined using the binomial method, as described in note 2(r), taking into account the 
exercise price, the term of the option, the share price at grant date, the expected price volatility of the underlying share and the 
risk free interest rate for the term of the option.

The table below summarises options granted during the six months ended 31 December 2017:

Grant Date

Expiry date

Exercise price

13/12/2017 

30/06/2025 

13/12/2017 

18/11/2024 

$1.34 

$1.85 

Number at 
start of the 
period

Granted 
during the 
period

Exercised 
during the 
period

Lapsed during 
the period

Number at 
end of the 
period

Exercisable 
at end of the 
period

- 

- 

4,832,2211 

1,500,0002 

6,332,221 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

4,832,221 

1,500,000 

6,332,221 

-

-

-

1 Comprises 1,820,654 and 800,703 options granted as part of the Managing Director’s and the Chief Financial Officer’s respective
incentive based remuneration packages, and 2,210,864 other options granted under the Employee Long Term Incentive Plan. 
The options will vest on satisfaction of the following Vesting Conditions during the three year vesting period commencing on 1 
July 2017 and ending on 30 June 2020:

(a) Market Based Performance:

50% of the options will be assessed for vesting based upon the Company’s relative share price performance at the start of 
the vesting period, being the 20 day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of the Company’s shares immediately preceding 
1  July  2017,  to  the  closing  price  of  the  Company’s  shares  at  the  conclusion  of  the  vesting  period,  being  the  20  day VWAP 
immediately preceding 30 June 2020, versus the performance of the S&P/ASX 300 Resources Index (XKR) for the same period, 
in accordance with a defined scale as follows:
_  Below 10% of index performance = nil vesting;
_  Between -10% and (0%) of index performance = vests 2.5% per 1% so “at index” 25% vests; and
_  Above index performance = vests at 3% per 1% so at 25% above index 100% vests; and

(b) Total Shareholder Return (TSR):

50% of the options will be assessed for vesting based upon the Company’s TSR from the opening price of the Company’s 
shares at the start of the Vesting Period to the closing price of the Company’s shares at the conclusion of the vesting period. 
The performance measure is absolute performance based on compound annual growth rate achieved in TSR.  The proportion 
of the TSR Options that vests into shares will be determined in accordance with the following vesting scale:
_  Zero to 10% = vests at 3% per 1% so at 10% TSR 30% vests;
_  Above 10% = vests at 7% per 1% so at 20% TSR 100% vests.

70

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
2  Represents options granted to advisors in recognition of past and future contributions.  The options will vest on satisfaction of
the following Vesting Conditions during the three year vesting period commencing on 1 July 2016 and ending on 30 June 2019:

(a) Market Based Performance:

50% of the options will be assessed for vesting based upon the Company’s relative share price performance at the start of 
the vesting period, being the 20 day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of the Company’s shares immediately preceding 
1 July 2016, to the closing price of the Company’s shares at the conclusion of the vesting period, being the 20 day VWAP 
immediately  preceding  30  June  2019,  versus  the  performance  of  the  S&P/ASX  300  Resources  Index  (XKR)  for  the  same 
period, in accordance with a defined scale as follows:
_  Below 10% of index performance = nil vesting;
_  Between -10% and (0%) of index performance = vests 2.5% per 1% so “at index” 25% vests; and
_  Above index performance = vests at 3% per 1% so at 25% above index 100% vests;

(b) Total Shareholder Return (TSR):

50% of the options will be assessed for the vesting based upon the Company’s TSR from the opening price of the Company’s 
shares at the start of the Vesting Period to the closing price of the Company’s shares at the conclusion of the vesting period. 
The performance measure is absolute performance based on compound annual growth rate achieved in TSR.  The proportion 
of the TSR Options that vests into shares will be determined in accordance with the following vesting scale:
_  Zero to 10% = vests at 3% per 1% so at 10% TSR 30% vests;
_  Above 10% = vests at 7% per 1% so at 20% TSR 100% vests.

The model inputs for options granted during the six months ended 31 December 2017 included:

a) options were granted for no consideration;

b) expected lives of the options range from 6.9 to 7.6 years;

c) share price at grant date  was $0.90;

d) expected volatility was 50%;

e) expected dividend yield of Nil; and

f) a risk free interest rate of 2.2%.

Financial Report

71

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersThe table below summarises options granted during the year ended 30 June 2017:

Grant Date

Expiry date

Exercise price

15/08/2016 

30/06/2019 

18/11/2016 

18/11/2024 

18/11/2016 

30/06/2019 

28/04/2017 

18/11/2024 

$2.50 

$1.85 

$2.00 

$1.85 

Number at 
start of the 
period

Granted 
during the 
period

Exercised 
during the 
period

Lapsed  during 
the period

Number at 
end of the 
period

Exercisable 
at end of the 
period

- 

- 

- 

- 

3,850,0001 

3,000,0002 

2,000,0003 

2,830,0002 

11,680,000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(50,000) 

3,800,000 

3,000,000 

- 

- 

2,000,000 

2,000,000

-

-

(480,000) 

2,350,000 

-

(530,000) 

11,150,000 

2,000,000

1 Employees were granted 3,850,000 options exercisable at $2.50 each on or before 30 June 2019:

(a) 3,050,000 options vested on 30 June 2017.

(b)  750,000 options will vest on the earlier of 30 June 2018 (provided that the optionholder remains in their capacity as an

employee of the Company on this date) and the occurrence of a change of control event.

(c) 50,000 options lapsed during the period.

2 Employees  were  granted  5,830,000  options,  exercisable  at  $1.85  each  on  or  before  18  November  2024,  of  which  480,000
options lapsed during the period.  The remaining options will vest on satisfaction of the following Vesting Conditions during the 
three year vesting period commencing on 1 July 2016 and ending on 30 June 2019:

(a) Market Based Performance:

50% of the options will be assessed for vesting based upon the Company’s relative share price performance at the start of the 
vesting period, being the 20 day Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of the Company’s shares immediately preceding 1 July 
2016, to the closing price of the Company’s shares at the conclusion of the vesting period, being the 20 day VWAP immediately 
preceding 30 June 2019 versus the performance of the S&P/ASX 300 Resources Index (XKR) for the same period, in accordance 
with a defined scale as follows:
_  Below 10% of index performance = nil vesting;
_  Between -10% and (0%) of index performance = vests 2.5% per 1% so “at index” 25% vests;
_  Above index performance = vests at 3% per 1% so at 25% above index 100% vests;

(b) Total Shareholder Return (TSR):

50% of the options will be assessed for the vesting based upon the Company’s TSR from the opening price of the Company’s 
shares at the start of the Vesting Period to the closing price of the Company’s shares at the conclusion of the vesting period. The 
performance measure is absolute performance based on compound annual growth rate achieved in TSR.

The proportion of the TSR Options that vest into shares will be determined in accordance with the following vesting scale:
_  Zero to 10% = vests at 3% per 1% so at 10% TSR 30% vests;
_  Above 10% = vests at 7% per 1% so at 20% TSR 100% vests.

3  Directors were granted 2,000,000 options, exercisable at $2.00 each on or before 30 June 2019.  No vesting conditions apply.

The model inputs for options granted during the six months ended 31 December 2017 included:

a) options were granted for no consideration;

b) expected lives of the options range from 2.6 to 8.0 years;

c) share price at grant date ranged from $1.06 to $1.42;

d) expected volatility ranging from 36% to 57%;

e) expected dividend yield of Nil; and

f) a risk free interest rate ranging from 1.75% to 2.09%.

72

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
19. GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENT ANALYSIS

(a) Revenue – Interest Received

Australia 

Spain 

(b) Non-current Assets

Australia 

Spain 

31 December 2017
(6 months)
$

7,470 

- 

7,470 

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

198,888

-

198,888

- 

94,321,640 

94,321,640 

-

86,950,790

86,950,790

20. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD

There have been no significant events after the reporting period requiring disclosure in this report.

21. CONTINGENT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

There are no known contingent assets or liabilities as at 31 December 2017 (June 2017: Nil).

22. DIVIDENDS

No dividend was paid or declared by the Company in the six months ended 31 December 2017 or the period since the end of the 
six months financial period and up to the date of this report. The Directors do not recommend that any amount be paid by way of 
dividend for the six months ended 31 December 2017.

23. GEOALCALI FOUNDATION

As part of its Community Engagement Program, the Company established a not-for-profit Spanish foundation called the Geoalcali 
Foundation (“Foundation”). The Foundation is supported exclusively by Geoalcali and since its inauguration in September 2014 has 
been involved in over 70 community projects.

24. COMMITMENTS
At 31 December 2017, the Group had entered into a number of contracts as part of the development of the Muga Potash Project 
located in Spain. The expected payments in relation to these contracts which were not required to be recognised as liabilities at 
31 December 2017 amounted to approximately $20.3m.  The contracts are able to be terminated by the Company at any point in 
time. The minimum amount payable following termination is approximately $1.0m.

Financial Report

73

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
25. PARENT ENTITY INFORMATION

The following information relates to the parent entity, Highfield Resources Limited, at 31 December 2017 and for the six months 
then ended. The information presented here has been prepared using consistent accounting policies with those presented in 
note 2.

Current assets 

Total assets 

Current liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

Issued capital 

Reserves 

Accumulated losses 

Total Equity 

Profit/(loss) of the parent entity 

Other comprehensive income for the period 

Total comprehensive income/(loss) of the parent entity 

31 December 2017
$

65,018,756 

157,587,556 

(311,507) 

(311,507) 

30 June 2017
$

69,083,472

156,302,756

(75,247)

(75,247)

157,276,049 

156,227,509 

172,399,841 

19,810,466 

(34,934,258) 

157,276,049 

31 December 2017
(6 months)
$

733,934 

- 

733,934 

172,399,841

19,495,860

(35,668,192)

156,227,509

30 June 2017
(12 months)
$

(6,313,792)

-

(6,313,792)

74

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
Directors’ Declaration  

In accordance with a resolution of the Directors of Highfield Resources Limited, I state that:

1. In the opinion of the Directors:

a)  the financial statements and notes of Highfield Resources Limited for the six months ended 31 December 2017  are in

accordance with the  Corporations Act  2001, including:

i.   giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 31 December 2017 and of its performance for the period

ended on that date; and

ii.  complying with Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations), the Corporations Regulations

2001 and other mandatory professional reporting requirements; and

b)  the financial statements and notes also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in note 2(b).

2. There are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and

payable.

3. This  declaration  has  been  made  after  receiving  the  declaration  by  the  Managing  Director  and  the  Chief  Financial  Officer
required to be made in accordance with sections of 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the six months ended 31 December 
2017.

On behalf of the Board

Peter Albert 
Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer

Pamplona, Spain

23 March 2018

Financial Report
Financial Report

75

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders76

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersAuditor’s Independence Declaration 

Financial Report

77

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersIndependent Auditor’s Report

78

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersFinancial Report

79

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders80

Financial Report

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersFinancial Report

81

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersASX Additional 
Information

82

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders83

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersAdditional information required by the Australian Securities Exchange Ltd and not shown elsewhere in this report is as follows. 
The information is current at 14 March 2018.

DISTRIBUTION OF SHARE HOLDERS

1 - 1,000 

1,001 - 5,000 

5,001 - 10,000  

10,001 - 100,000 

100,001- and over 

TOTAL 

Ordinary Shares

Number of Holders

Number of Shares

209  

422  

349  

865 

212 

2,057 

104,788

1,338,751

2,842,054

29,703,885

295,235,525

329,225,003

There were 85 holders of ordinary shares holding less than a marketable parcel.

TOP TWENTY SHARE HOLDERS 

The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:

Name  

J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED 

MR. WARREN WILLIAM BROWN + MRS. MARILYN HELENA BROWN 

WWB INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 

W W B INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 

DEREK CARTER + CARLSA CARTER  

HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED 

BRING ON RETIREMENT LTD 

BNP PARIBAS NOMS PTY LTD 

MR. DANIEL EDDINGTON + MRS. JULIE EDDINGTON  

CELTIC CAPITAL PTE LTD  

MR. CRAIG PETER BALL + MRS. SUZANNE KATHERINE BALL  

CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 

MR. MICHAEL ANDREW WHITING + MRS. TRACEY ANNE WHITING  

JONERIC PTY LTD  

JAWAF ENTERPRISES PTY LTD  

WOOTOONA  INVESTMENTS  PTY LIMITED 

DORICA NOMINEES PTY LTD  

KANBAH PTY LTD  

PETER DAVID FERGUSON PTY LTD  

HGT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 

84

ASX Additional Information

Number of shares 

136,688,552 

15,921,550 

11,850,000 

7,728,450 

7,721,504 

7,119,202 

5,826,397 

4,119,558 

3,870,000 

3,600,000 

3,292,384 

2,926,606 

2,715,718 

2,701,076 

2,250,000 

2,150,538 

2,150,000 

1,900,000 

1,855,000 

1,750,000 

%

41.52

4.84

3.60

2.35

2.35

2.16

1.77

1.24

1.18

1.09

1.00

0.89

0.82

0.82

0.68

0.65

0.65

0.58

0.56

0.53

228,136,535 

69.30

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders  
 
   
SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS 

The following table shows holdings of five per cent or more of voting rights in Highfield Resources Limited’s shares as notified to 
the Company under the Australian Corporations Act 2001, Section 671B as at 14 March 2018.

Title of class  

Registered holder of securities

Identity of person or group

Date of last 
notice  

Number 
owned

Percentage 
of total voting 
rights2

Ordinary Shares

JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited

EMR Capital Investment (No. 2) Pte Ltd1

15/05/2015

104,038,875

Ordinary Shares

JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited

AustralianSuper Pty Ltd1

28/07/2017

16,524,841

Ordinary Shares

Various holders

W W B Investments Pty Ltd1

08/11/2017

35,500,000

31.60%

5.02%

10.79%

1Being the group listed and its associated entities

2 The percentages quoted are based on the total voting rights conferred by ordinary shares in the Company as at 14 March 2018
of 329,225,003

UNLISTED OPTIONS

Class 

Number

Holders with more than 20%

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $0.75 on or before 30 June 2018

3,350,000 Bentley Capital Limited 800,000 options 

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $0.75 on or before 11 September 2018

9,500,000

John Claverley 2,500,000 options
Ernest Hall  2,000,000 options

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $1.00 on or before 30 June 2018

750,000 Kien Huynh 300,000 options

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $1.25 on or before 30 June 2018

4,000,000

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $2.00 on or before 30 June 2019

17,175,000

Bentley Capital Limited 1,000,000 options
Michael Schlumpberger 1,500,000 options

JAWAF Enterprises Pty Ltd 
4,000,000 options

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $2.50 on or before 30 June 2019

4,550,000 Bentley Capital Limited 1,000,000 options

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $1.85 on or before 18 November 2024

5,350,000 Sonedala Albert 2,000,000 Options

Options over ordinary shares exercisable at $1.34 on or before 30 June 2025

4,832,221 Sonedala Albert 1,420,654 Options

Options over ordinary share exercisable at $1.85 on or before 30 June 2024

1,500,000

Isaac Querub 1,000,000 Options
Sixto Jimenez 500,000 Options

ASX Additional Information

85

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersON-MARKET BUY BACK

There is no current on-market buy back.

VOTING RIGHTS

All ordinary shares carry one vote per share without restriction. Options have no voting rights.

USE OF PROCEEDS

In accordance with listing rule 4.10.19, the Company confirms that it has used cash and assets in a form readily convertible to cash 
in a way consistent with its business objectives during the six months ended 31 December 2017.

86

ASX Additional Information

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersIzaga 

Izaga 

Izaga 

Vipasca 

Vipasca 

Muga 

Muga 

Muga 

Muga 

Muga 

Pintanos 

Pintanos 

Pintanos 

SCHEDULE OF TENEMENTS

Highfield’s Spanish potash projects are located in the Ebro potash producing basin in Northern Spain. Details are shown in the     
table below.

Project

Region

Permit Name

Permit Type Applied

Granted

Ref#

Area Km2 Holder

Structure

Sierra del Perdón  Navarra 

Quiñones 

Investigation  19/07/2011 

07/08/2012 

35760 

Sierra del Perdón  Navarra 

Adiós 

Investigation  19/07/2011 

07/08/2012 

35770 

Sierra del Perdón  Navarra 

Ampliación de Adiós 

Investigation  26/10/2012 

14/02/2014 

35880 

Navarra 

Girardi 

Investigation  28/04/2015 

26/01/2017 

35950 

Navarra 

Osquia 

Investigation  28/04/2015 

12/01/2017 

35970 

Navarra 

Palero 

Investigation  12/05/2017 

Pending 

36000 

Navarra 

Vipasca 

Investigation  06/11/2013 

11/12/2014 

35900 

Navarra 

Borneau 

Investigation  28/04/2015 

12/01/2017 

35960 

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

32,48 

75,60 

40,90 

148,98

38,57 

57,42 

11,76 

107,75

38,92 

80,33 

119,25

Navarra 

Goyo 

Investigation  19/07/2011 

24/12/2012 

35780 

27,72 

Geoalcali SL  100%

Navarra 

Goyo Sur 

Investigation  25/07/2014 

Pending 

35920 

8,96 

Geoalcali SL  100%

Aragón 

Fronterizo 

Investigation  21/06/2012 

05/02/2014 

Z-3502/N-3585  9,80 

Geoalcali SL  100%

Aragón 

Muga 

Investigation  29/05/2013 

07/04/2014 

3500 

20,40 

Geoalcali SL  100%

Aragón 

Muga Sur 

Investigation  25/09/2014 

Pending 

3524 

Aragón 

Molineras 10 

Investigation  20/11/2012 

06/03/2014 

3495/10 

Aragón 

Molineras 20 

Investigation  19/02/2013 

Pending 

3495/20 

Aragón 

Puntarrón 

Investigation  08/05/2014 

Pending 

3510 

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

Geoalcali SL  100%

7,28 

74,16

18,20 

16,80 

30,24 

65,24

Total 

515,38

ASX Additional Information

87

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Project locations are shown in the following map*.

*The potential quantity and grade of the Exploration Target is conceptual in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral

Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the estimation of a Mineral Resource

88

ASX Additional Information

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to ShareholdersIMPORTANT INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMERS

Forward Looking Statements

This Report includes certain ‘forward looking statements’. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward 
looking  statements  that  involve  various  risks  and  uncertainties. There  can  be  no  assurances  that  such  statements  will  prove 
accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Such information 
contained herein represents management’s best judgment as of the date hereof based on information currently available. The 
company does not assume any obligation to update any forward looking statement.

Competent Person Statement 

The Review of Operations contained within this annual report was prepared by Mr. Peter Albert, CEO and Managing Director 
of Highfield Resources. The information in this document that relates to Ore Reserves, Mineral Resources, Exploration Results 
and Exploration Targets is based on information prepared by Mr. José Antonio Zuazo Osinaga, Technical Director of CRN, S.A., 
Managing Director of CRN, S.A. and Mr. Manuel Jesús Gonzalez Roldan, Geologist of CRN, S.A. Mr. José Antonio Zuazo Osinaga 
is a licensed professional geologist in Spain, and is a registered member of the European Federation of Geologists, an accredited 
organization to which the Competent Person (CP) under JORC Code Reporting Standards must belong in order to report Exploration 
Results, Mineral Resources, Ore Reserves or Exploration Targets through the ASX. Mr. José Antonio Zuazo Osinaga has sufficient 
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is 
undertaking to qualify as a CP as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, 
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.

89

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders90

Highfield Resources Limited  31 December 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders