HNI
Annual Report 2013

Plain-text annual report

HNI Corporation 2013 Annual Report Financial Highlights (Amounts in thousands, except for per share and member data) 2013 2012 INCOME STATEMENT DATA Net sales Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related and impairment charges Operating income Net income attributable to HNI Corporation Net income attributable to HNI Corporation as a % of: Net sales Average shareholders’ equity Per common share: Net income attributable to HNI Corporation—basic Net income attributable to HNI Corporation—diluted Cash dividends BALANCE SHEET DATA Total assets Long-term debt and capital lease obligations Debt/capitalization ratio HNI Corporation’s shareholders’ equity Working capital OTHER DATA Capital expenditures (including capitalized software) Cash flow from operations Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted Share repurchases Number of shareholders at year-end Members (employees) at year-end $ 2,059,964 $ 2,004,003 $ 715,292 $ 689,227 $ 608,972 $ 599,656 $ 333 $ 105,987 $ 63,683 $ $ $ 1,944 87,627 48,967 3.1% 14.9% 2.4% 11.7% $ $ $ 1.41 1.39 0.96 $ $ $ 1.08 1.07 0.95 $ 1,134,705 $ 1,077,066 $ 150,197 $ 150,372 25.6% 26.4% $ 436,328 $ 420,359 $ 21,644 $ 13,204 $ 78,895 $ 60,270 $ 165,002 $ 144,777 45,250,665 45,211,385 45,956,280 45,819,979 $ 27,488 $ 21,021 7,538 10,310 7,790 10,352 Delivering Results NET SALES (in millions) NET INCOME (in millions) CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS (in millions) 3 3 8 1 $ , 4 0 0 , 2 $ 0 6 0 , 2 $ 6 4 $ 9 4 $ 4 6 $ 4 3 1 $ 5 4 1 $ 5 6 1 $ 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 12% Revenue Growth (2011–2013) 38% Profit Growth (2011–2013) CASH DIVIDEND (per common share) $444 Cash Generated (2011–2013) 6 5 . 0 $ 2 6 . 0 $ 2 7 . 0 $ 8 7 . 0 $ 6 8 . 0 $ 6 8 . 0 $ 6 8 . 0 $ 2 9 . 0 $ 5 9 . 0 $ 6 9 . 0 $ 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Shareholder We delivered on our commitments—significantly increasing profits, investing in our businesses for long-term, profitable growth and continuing to build strong businesses to outperform the market. We had a great year in 2013. We delivered on our commitments—significantly increasing profits, investing in our businesses for long-term, profit- able growth and continuing to build strong busi- nesses to outperform the market. Our profits increased over 30 percent on sales growth of three percent. We continued to deliver strong cash generation with $165 million in operating cash flow. Our strategies are working and are unchanged: focus on the core, split and focus with leverage, core plus market growth and Rapid Continuous Improvement inspired and supported by our member/owner culture. Our market momentum is strong and our businesses are well positioned for long-term, profitable growth. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT In 2013, the U.S. economy continued on a path of slow growth with unemployment remaining above pre-recession levels, low white collar job growth and reduced spending by the federal government. Economic growth slowed in our key international markets of China and India. These overall eco- nomic conditions provided headwinds to our office furniture sales. The housing construction and remodel /retrofit markets continued to rebound, fueling strong growth for our hearth business. HEARTH BUSINESS—OUTSTANDING SALES AND PROFIT GROWTH Our hearth business achieved outstanding finan- cial results, delivering $20 million operating profit growth on $58 million in additional sales. Our aggressive cost structure reset and strategic investments during the great recession provide the foundation for strong long-term financial returns. We have the best known and most pre- ferred brands by both builders and homeowners, supported by the best products, distribution and customer-focused organization in the industry. OFFICE FURNITURE—STRONG PERFORMANCE IN CORE MARKETS Our supplies-driven and contract businesses out- performed the market. We invested aggressively in new product solutions and platforms to meet the needs of our customers. Our new products have been well received, with strong demand across channels, customers and end users. Sales in our international businesses were rela- tively flat, challenged by slowing growth in China and India. Our international strategy remains on track for long-term, profitable growth. Lamex con- tinues to strengthen our leading market position in China. We successfully entered India with the acquisition of BP Ergo, an important long-term growth platform for this rapidly growing market. FINANCIALLY STRONG AND INVESTING FOR THE FUTURE We strengthened our financial position in 2013, ending the year with our lowest debt level in eight years. Working capital was again a key source of cash. Our capital priorities are unchanged: reinvest in our businesses, pay dividends to our share- holders, seek value enhancing acquisitions and, when appropriate, repurchase stock, primarily to offset dilution. Our balance sheet provides sig- nificant capacity for future investment. We accelerated manufacturing and distribution investments in 2013 in response to the changing requirements of the workplace and to deliver con- sistent, flawless performance to our customers. Our operational investments and strong execution drove excellent performance in complete and on- time shipments, lead times, safety and quality. We continued to invest in our marketing and sell- ing capabilities with better branding, content and improved connectivity with our channel partners. Business Systems Transformation (BST) remains a key long-term investment for HNI. This strategic HNI CORPORATION initiative is centered on simplifying and trans- forming our business processes to deliver more value for our customers and reducing non-value added costs. We made great progress on BST in 2013 with significant work to continue in the com- ing years. STRONG MOMENTUM FOR 2014 I am optimistic about our businesses and our prospects. Our office furniture businesses are strong and we are investing significantly for their future success. Our hearth business is delivering significant value based on a reset cost structure and long-term investments. With strong brands, the broadest market coverage and outstanding sales partners, we are well positioned to continue our momentum: growing profits, investing in our businesses for the long term and outperforming the market. THANK YOU I want to thank our customers and our sharehold- ers for their continued loyalty, trust and support and our members for their dedication and hard work over the past year. A A k Stan A. Askren St Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer HNI Corporation 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Who We Are Leading brands. Leading products. Leading customer service. HNI Corporation is a group of strong performing companies with a shared purpose of achieving a leading position in every market we serve and creating sustainable shareholder value. We offer our customers tuned and tailored solutions, drawing on the broadest and deepest selec- tion in the industry. We deliver what our customers need—when, where and how they need it. Not a one-size-fits-all approach. We have an unmatched ability to deliver smart, innovative solutions across the world. We offer the broadest product selection, fulfillment through multiple distribution channels and guaranteed results. Our commitment: the best products, the best service and better outcomes for our customers. World’s 2nd Largest Manufacturer of Office Furniture Global Leader of Hearth Products HNI CORPORATION Inspired by practicality, offering a full line of high-quality solutions serving the small and medium- sized workplace. Helping organizations deliver workplace outcomes that matter. An industry leader in the design, manufacture and marketing of premium wood office furniture. ® Inspired design and craftsmanship in beautiful wood office furniture and fabrics worldwide. A leading provider of private office, conference and seating solutions at mid-tier price points. The number-one preferred fire- place brand among homebuilders since 1927. The innovation and design leader in gas hearth systems—the indus- try’s most award-winning brand. The hearth industry’s foremost producer of precision quality- crafted wood and pellet stoves. China’s trusted leader in manufacturing and marketing a full range of office furniture solutions. ® India’s leading office furniture company and pioneer of modern modular furniture. Industry leader for K–12 educational furniture. Office furniture systems with planning and design technologies for mid-sized businesses. Renowned for performance, durability and control in wood, pellet and gas fueled hearth products. America’s largest network of hearth product and service outlets for consumers and homebuilders. ® The nation’s leading manufacturer and marketer of hearth products. 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Our Unique Culture “Our culture remains our greatest strength. Every HNI member is empowered, accountable and respected. Our culture drives our behaviors, and our behaviors drive better outcomes—outcomes that matter to our customers and shareholders.” —STAN A. ASKREN, CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO OUR MEMBERS ARE THE DIFFERENCE HNI CORPORATION Sustaining our culture requires constant focus and commitment to our members. We commit to being a great place to work and providing a safe work environment. We commit to valuing member ideas and feedback. We commit to an environment where our members are engaged, have an impact and build a career. In 2013, we delivered on these commitments. We had a record year for safety in our office furniture operations. We drove reduction in member turnover. We implemented tens of thousands of member improvement ideas. We grew profit sharing with members. When we deliver on our commitments to our members, our members deliver on their commitments to customers and shareholders—behaving like owners. 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Our Business Model Our unique business model is a competitive advantage. With our decentralized split-and-focus approach, each of our companies devotes its full energy to selected customers’ unique needs. We also leverage our businesses to harness the full power of HNI when it better serves our customers—sharing resources, systems, capabilities and people. SPLIT AND FOCUS ® LEVERAGE PROCUREMENT + INFO TECHNOLOGY + LOGISTICS + MANUFACTURING + SHARED SERVICES MANAGEMENT PRACTICES + MANUFACTURING BEST PRACTICES + LEAN THINKING + PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT MEMBER /OWNER CULTURE Our Investment Approach Our Core Plus growth strategy has a dual focus: working continuously to strengthen and extract new growth from our core while identifying and developing new, adjacent areas to extend our growth. CORE PLUS We are building and extracting new growth from our “Core” While extracting more from our Core, we simultaneously develop businesses. We are focused on delivering tuned and tailored new growth frontiers adjacent to our Core. These “Plus” opportu- solutions to our customers and delivering solutions relevant to nities include new businesses like our Architectural Walls our markets. We constantly invest in product development, business, new or strengthened vertical market approaches like branding, marketing, selling resources and tools and consistent, K–12 education and new geographies like India, where we extended flawless execution. our reach through our acquisition of BP Ergo. HNI CORPORATION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 An Iowa Corporation Commission File Number 1-14225 HNI Corporation 408 East Second Street P. O. Box 1109 Muscatine, IA 52761-0071 563/272-7400 IRS Employer No. 42-0617510 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Common Stock, with par value of $1.00 per share. Name of each exchange on which registered New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant, as of June 28, 2013 was $952,837,745, based on the New York Stock Exchange closing price for such shares on that date, assuming for purposes of this calculation that all 5% holders and all directors and executive officers of the Registrant are affiliates. The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's common stock, as of January 31, 2014 was 44,982,873. Documents Incorporated by Reference Portions of the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014 are incorporated by reference into Part III. Table of Contents ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Page Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Item 15. Signatures Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Table I – Executive Officers of the Registrant PART II Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation PART III Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accounting Fees and Services Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules PART IV Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Financial Statements Financial Statement Schedules Index of Exhibits 4 10 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 33 34 34 34 34 35 35 35 35 35 36 37 39 40 41 75 76 -3- Table of Contents ITEM 1. BUSINESS General ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K PART I HNI Corporation (the “Corporation”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is an Iowa corporation incorporated in 1944. The Corporation is a provider of office furniture and hearth products. A broad office furniture product offering is sold to dealers, wholesalers, national office product distributors, end-user customers, and federal, state and local governments. Dealers and wholesalers are the largest channels based on sales. Hearth products include a full array of gas, electric, wood and biomass burning fireplaces, inserts, stoves, facings and accessories. These products are sold through a national system of dealers and distributors, as well as Corporation- owned distribution and retail outlets. In fiscal 2013, the Corporation had net sales of $2.1 billion, of which approximately $1.7 billion or 82% was attributable to office furniture products and $0.4 billion or 18% was attributable to hearth products. Please refer to Operating Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about operating segments. The Corporation is organized into a corporate headquarters and operating units with offices, manufacturing plants, distribution centers and sales showrooms in the United States, Canada, China, Hong Kong, India and Taiwan. See Item 2. Properties later in this report for additional related discussion. Nine operating units, marketing under various brand names, participate in the office furniture industry. These operating units include: The HON Company LLC ("HON"), Allsteel Inc., Maxon Furniture Inc., The Gunlocke Company L.L.C., Paoli LLC, Hickory Business Furniture, LLC (“HBF”), Artco-Bell Corporation. ("Artcobell"), HNI Hong Kong Limited (“Lamex”) and BP Ergo Limited ("BP Ergo"). Each of these operating units provides products which are sold through various channels of distribution and segments of the industry. The operating unit Hearth & Home Technologies LLC (“Hearth & Home”) participates in the hearth products industry. The retail and distribution brand for this operating unit is Fireside Hearth & Home. HNI International Inc. (“HNI International”) sells office furniture products manufactured by the Corporation’s operating units in select markets outside the United States and Canada. With dealers and servicing partners located in more than fifty countries, HNI International provides project management services virtually anywhere in the world. Since inception, the Corporation has been committed to systematically eliminating waste and in 1992 introduced its process improvement approach known as Rapid Continuous Improvement (“RCI”), which focuses on streamlining design, manufacturing and administrative processes. The Corporation's RCI program has contributed to increased productivity, lower costs, improved product quality and enhanced workplace safety. In addition, the Corporation's RCI efforts enable it to offer short average lead times, from receipt of order to delivery and installation, for most products. The Corporation distributes its products through an extensive network of independent office furniture dealers, office products dealers, wholesalers and retailers. The Corporation is a supplier of office furniture to the largest nationwide distributors of office products. The Corporation's product development efforts are focused on developing and providing solutions that are relevant and differentiated, and deliver quality, aesthetics and style. An important element of the Corporation's success has been its member-owner culture, which has enabled it to attract, develop, retain and motivate skilled, experienced and efficient members (i.e., employees). Each of the Corporation's eligible members has the opportunity to own stock in the Corporation through a number of stock-based plans, including a member stock purchase plan and a profit-sharing retirement plan, which drives a unique level of commitment to the Corporation’s success throughout the workforce. For further financial-related information with respect to acquisitions, divestitures, operating segment information, restructuring and the Corporation’s operations in general, refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II of this report, and the following sections in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements: Nature of Operations, Business Combinations and Operating Segment Information. -4- Table of Contents Industry According to the Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer's Association (“BIFMA”), U.S. office furniture industry shipments were estimated to be $9.4 billion in 2013, an increase of 1% compared to 2012, which was a 1% decrease from 2011 levels. The U.S. office furniture market consists of two primary channels—the contract channel and the supplies-driven channel. The contract channel has traditionally been characterized by sales of office furniture and services to large corporations, primarily for new office facilities, relocations or department or office redesigns, which are frequently customized to meet specific client and designer preferences. Contract furniture is generally purchased through office furniture dealers who typically prepare a custom- designed office layout emphasizing image and design. The selling process is complex and lengthy and generally has several manufacturers competing for the same projects. The supplies-driven channel of the market, in which the Corporation is a leader, primarily represents smaller orders of office furniture purchased by small/medium businesses on the basis of price, quality, selection and speed and reliability of delivery. Office products dealers, wholesalers and national office product distributors are the primary distribution channels in this market channel. Office furniture and products dealers publish periodic catalogs displaying office furniture and products from various manufacturers. The Corporation also competes in the hearth products industry, where it is a market leader. Hearth products are typically purchased by builders during the construction of new homes and homeowners during the renovation of existing homes. Both types of purchases involve seasonality with remodel/retrofit activity being concentrated in the September to December time- frame. Distribution is primarily through independent dealers, who may buy direct from the manufacturer or from an intermediate distributor. The Corporation sells approximately 40% of its hearth products to the new construction/builder channel. Growth Strategy The Corporation's strategy is to build on its position as a leading manufacturer of office furniture and hearth products in North America and pursue select global markets where opportunities exist to create shareholder value. The components of this growth strategy are to introduce new products, build brand equity, provide outstanding customer satisfaction by focusing on the end-user, strengthen the distribution network, respond to global competition, pursue complementary strategic acquisitions, enter markets not currently served and continually reduce costs. The Corporation’s strategy has a dual focus: working continuously to extract new growth from its core markets while identifying and developing new, adjacent potential areas of growth. The Corporation focuses on extracting new growth from each of its existing businesses by deepening its understanding of end-users, using new insights gained to refine branding, selling and marketing and developing new products to serve them better. The Corporation also pursues opportunities in potential growth drivers related to its core business, such as vertical markets or new distribution models. Employees/Members As of December 28, 2013, the Corporation employed approximately 10,300 persons, 9,900 of whom were full-time and 400 of whom were temporary personnel. The Corporation believes its labor relations are good. Products and Solutions Office Furniture The Corporation designs, manufactures and markets a broad range of office furniture systems and seating across a range of price points. The Corporation's portfolio includes panel-based and freestanding furniture systems and complementary products such as seating, storage and tables. The Corporation offers a complete line of office panel system products and freestanding desks, classroom solutions, bookshelves and credenzas in order to meet the needs of a wide spectrum of organizations. The Corporation offers a variety of storage options designed either to be integrated into the Corporation's office systems products or to function as freestanding furniture in office applications. The Corporation's seating line includes chairs designed for all types of office work. The chairs are available in a variety of frame colors, coverings and a wide range of price points. Key customer criteria in seating includes superior design, ergonomics, aesthetics, comfort and quality. -5- Table of Contents To meet the demands of various markets, the Corporation's products are sold under the Corporation's brands – HON®, Allsteel®, Maxon®, Gunlocke®, Paoli®, HBF®, artcobellTM, Midwest Folding ProductsTM, American DeskTM, basyx® by HON, Lamex® and ERGO®, as well as private labels. Hearth Products The Corporation is North America’s largest manufacturer and marketer of prefabricated fireplaces, hearth stoves and related products, primarily for the home, which it sells under its widely recognized Heatilator®, Heat & Glo®, Quadra-Fire®, Harman StoveTM and PelProTM brand names. The Corporation’s line of hearth products includes a full array of gas, electric and wood burning fireplaces, inserts, stoves, facings and accessories. Heatilator® and Heat & Glo® are brand leaders in the two largest segments of the home fireplace market: vented- gas and wood fireplaces. The Corporation is the leader in “direct vent” fireplaces, which replace the chimney-venting system used in traditional fireplaces with a less expensive vent through the roof or an outer wall. In addition, the Corporation is the leader in pellet-burning stoves and furnaces with its Quadra-Fire®, Harman StoveTM and PelProTM product lines which provide home heating solutions using renewable fuel, an environmentally friendly trend that has come to the forefront in home heating. See “Intellectual Property” under this Item 1. Business for additional details. Manufacturing The Corporation manufactures office furniture in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, New York, North Carolina, Texas, China and India. The Corporation manufactures hearth products in Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, Washington and Pennsylvania. The Corporation purchases raw materials and components from a variety of suppliers, and generally most items are available from multiple sources. Major raw materials and components include coil steel, aluminum, zinc, castings, lumber, veneer, particleboard, fabric, paint, lacquer, hardware, plastic products and shipping cartons. Since its inception, the Corporation has focused on making its manufacturing facilities and processes more flexible while at the same time reducing cost, eliminating waste and improving product quality. The Corporation applies the principles of RCI and a lean manufacturing philosophy leveraging the creativity of its members to eliminate and reduce costs. To achieve flexibility and attain efficiency goals, the Corporation has adopted a variety of production techniques, including cellular manufacturing, focused factories, just-in-time inventory management, value engineering, business simplification and 80/20 principles. The application of RCI has increased productivity by reducing set-up and processing times, square footage, inventory levels, product costs and delivery times, while improving quality and enhancing member safety. The Corporation's RCI process involves production and administrative employees, management, customers and suppliers. The Corporation has facilitators, coaches and consultants dedicated to the RCI process and strives to involve all members in the RCI process. Manufacturing also plays a key role in the Corporation's concurrent product development process that primarily seeks to design new products for ease of manufacturability. Product Development The Corporation's product development efforts are primarily focused on developing end-user solutions that are relevant, differentiated and focused on quality, aesthetics, style, sustainable design and on reducing manufacturing costs. The Corporation accomplishes this through improving existing products, extending product lines and platforms, applying ergonomic research, improving manufacturing processes, applying alternative materials and providing engineering support and training to its operating units. The Corporation conducts its product development efforts at both the corporate and operating unit level. The Corporation invested approximately $27.3 million, $26.9 million and $23.1 million in product development during fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Intellectual Property As of December 28, 2013, the Corporation owned 268 U.S. and 248 foreign patents with expiration dates through 2038 and had applications pending for 24 U.S. and 61 foreign patents. In addition, the Corporation holds 174 U.S. and 463 foreign trademark registrations and has applications pending for 21 U.S. and 12 foreign trademarks. The Corporation's principal office furniture products do not require frequent technical changes. The Corporation believes neither any individual office furniture patent nor the Corporation's office furniture patents in the aggregate are material to the Corporation's business as a whole. -6- Table of Contents The Corporation’s patents covering its hearth products protect various technical innovations. While the acquisition of patents reflects Hearth & Home’s position in the market as an innovation leader, the Corporation believes neither any individual hearth product patent nor the Corporation’s hearth product patents in the aggregate are material to the Corporation’s business as a whole. The Corporation applies for patent protection when it believes the expense of doing so is justified, and the Corporation believes the duration of its registered patents is adequate to protect these rights. The Corporation also pays royalties in certain instances for the use of patents on products and processes owned by others. The Corporation applies for trademark protection for brands and products when it believes the expense of doing so is justified. The Corporation actively protects trademarks it believes have significant value. The Corporation believes neither the loss of any individual trademark nor the loss of the Corporation's trademarks in the aggregate would materially adversely affect the Corporation's business as a whole, except for HNI, HON and Allsteel. Sales and Distribution: Customers The Corporation sells its office furniture products through five principal distribution channels. The first channel consisting of independent, local office furniture and office products dealers, specializes in the sale of a broad range of office furniture and office furniture systems to business, government, education and health care entities. The second distribution channel comprises national office product distributors including Staples, Inc., as well as, Office Max Incorporated and Office Depot, Inc. which recently merged. These distributors sell furniture along with office supplies through a national network of dealerships and sales offices, which assist their customers with the evaluation of office space requirements, systems layout and product selection and design and office solution services provided by professional designers. All of these distributors also sell through retail office products superstores. The third distribution channel is where the Corporation has the lead selling relationship with the end-user. Installation and service are normally provided through a dealer. The fourth distribution channel comprises wholesalers serving as distributors of the Corporation's products to independent dealers, national supply dealers and superstores. The Corporation sells to the nation's largest office supply/furniture wholesalers, United Stationers Supply Co. and S.P. Richards Company. Wholesalers maintain inventory of standard product lines for resale to the various dealers and retailers. They also special order products from the Corporation in customer-selected models and colors. The Corporation's wholesalers maintain warehouse locations throughout the United States, which enables the Corporation to make its products available for rapid delivery to resellers anywhere in the country. The fifth distribution channel comprises direct sales of the Corporation's products to federal, state and local government offices. The Corporation's office furniture sales force consists of regional sales managers, salespersons and firms of independent manufacturers' representatives who collectively provide national sales coverage. Sales managers and salespersons are compensated by a combination of salary and variable performance compensation. Office products dealers, national wholesalers and retailers market their products over the Internet and through catalogs published periodically. These catalogs are distributed to existing and potential customers. The Corporation also makes export sales through HNI International to office furniture dealers and wholesale distributors serving select foreign markets. Distributors are principally located in the Middle East, Mexico, Latin America and the Caribbean. Through Lamex and BP Ergo, the Corporation manufactures and distributes office furniture directly to end-users and through independent dealers and distributors in China, India and the rest of Asia. Limited quantities of select finished goods inventories primarily built to order and awaiting shipment are at the Corporation's principal manufacturing plants and at its various distribution centers. Hearth & Home sells its fireplace and stove products through dealers, distributors and Corporation-owned distribution and retail outlets. The Corporation has a field sales organization of regional sales managers, salespersons and firms of independent manufacturers' representatives. In fiscal 2013, the Corporation's five largest customers represented approximately 23% of its consolidated net sales. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of the Corporation’s consolidated net sales in fiscal 2013. The substantial purchasing power exercised by large customers may adversely affect the prices at which the Corporation can successfully offer its products. -7- Table of Contents The above percentages do not include revenue from various government agencies. In aggregate, entities purchasing under the Corporation's U.S. General Services Administration contracts collectively accounted for approximately 2% of the Corporation's consolidated net sales. As of December 28, 2013, the Corporation had an order backlog of approximately $163.5 million, which will be filled in the ordinary course of business within the first few months of the fiscal year. This compares with $159.0 million as of December 29, 2012, and $159.1 million as of December 31, 2011. Backlog, in terms of percentage of net sales, was 7.9%, 7.9% and 8.7%, for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Corporation’s products are typically manufactured and shipped within a few weeks following receipt of order. The dollar amount of the Corporation’s order backlog is, therefore, not considered by management to be a leading indicator of the Corporation’s expected sales in any particular fiscal period. Competition The Corporation is the second largest office furniture manufacturer in the world and believes it is the largest provider of furniture to small- and medium-sized workplaces. The Corporation is the nation's largest manufacturer and marketer of fireplaces. The office furniture industry is highly competitive, with a significant number of competitors offering similar products. The Corporation competes by emphasizing its ability to deliver compelling value products, solutions and a high level of tailored customer service. The Corporation competes with large office furniture manufacturers, which cover a substantial portion of the North America market share in the contract-oriented office furniture market, such as Steelcase Inc., Haworth, Inc., Herman Miller, Inc. and Knoll, Inc. The Corporation also competes with a number of other office furniture manufacturers, including The Global Group (a Canadian company), Kimball International, Inc., Krueger International Inc. (KI), Virco Mfg. Corporation and Teknion Corporation (a Canadian company), as well as global importers. The Corporation faces significant price competition from its competitors and may encounter competition from new market entrants. Hearth products, consisting of prefabricated fireplaces and related products, are manufactured by a number of national and regional competitors. The Corporation competes primarily against a broad range of manufacturers, including Travis Industries Inc., Comvest Partners (Innovative Hearth Products), Vermont Castings Group, Wolf Steel Ltd. (Napoleon) and FPI Fireplace Products International Ltd. (Regency). Both office furniture and hearth products compete on the basis of performance, quality, price, complete and on-time delivery to the customer and customer service and support. The Corporation believes it competes principally by providing compelling value products designed to be among the best in their price range for product quality and performance, superior customer service and short lead-times. This is made possible, in part, by the Corporation's on-going investment in brands, product development, highly efficient and low cost manufacturing operations and an extensive distribution network. For further discussion of the Corporation's competitive situation, refer to “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” later in this report. Effects of Inflation Certain business costs may, from time to time, increase at a rate exceeding the general rate of inflation. The Corporation’s objective is to offset the effect of normal inflation on its costs primarily through productivity increases in combination with certain adjustments to the selling price of its products as competitive market and general economic conditions permit. Investments are routinely made in modernizing plants, equipment, information technology capabilities and RCI programs. These investments collectively focus on business simplification and increasing productivity which helps to offset the effect of rising material and labor costs. The Corporation also routinely employs ongoing cost control disciplines. In addition, the last-in, first- out ("LIFO") valuation method is used for most of the Corporation's inventories, which ensures changing material and labor costs are recognized in reported income and, more importantly, these costs are recognized in pricing decisions. Environmental The Corporation is subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing use of materials and substances in products, the management of wastes resulting from use of certain material and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances used in the past. Although the Corporation believes it is in material compliance with all of the various regulations applicable to its business, there can be no assurance requirements will not change in the future or the Corporation will not incur material costs to comply with such regulations. The Corporation has trained staff responsible for monitoring compliance -8- Table of Contents with environmental, health and safety requirements. The Corporation’s environmental staff works with responsible personnel at each manufacturing facility, the Corporation’s environmental legal counsel and consultants on the management of environmental, health and safety issues. The Corporation’s environmental objective is to reduce and, when practical, eliminate the human and ecosystem impacts of materials and manufacturing processes. The Corporation’s environmental management system has earned the recognition of numerous state and federal agencies as well as non-government organizations. Aligning continuous improvement initiatives with the Corporation’s environmental objectives creates a model of the triple bottom line of sustainable development where members work toward shared goals of personal growth, economic reward and a healthy environment for the future. Over the past several years, the Corporation has expanded its environmental management system and established metrics to influence product design and development, supplier and supply chain performance, energy and resource consumption and the impacts of its facilities. In addition, the Corporation is providing sustainability training to senior decision makers and has assigned resources to documenting and communicating its progress to an increasingly knowledgeable market. Integrating sustainable objectives into core business systems is consistent with the Corporation’s vision and ensures its commitment to being a sustainable enterprise remains a priority for all members. Compliance with federal, state and local environmental regulations has not had a material effect on the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Corporation to date. The Corporation does not anticipate financially material capital expenditures will be required during fiscal 2014 for environmental control facilities. It is management’s judgment that compliance with current regulations should not have a material effect on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance new environmental legislation, material science or technology in this area will not result in or require material capital expenditures. Business Development The development of the Corporation's business during the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is discussed in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” later in this report. Available Information Information regarding the Corporation’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports, will be made available, free of charge, on the Corporation’s website at www.hnicorp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Corporation electronically files such reports with or furnishes them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Corporation’s information is also available from the SEC’s Public Reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, or on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. -9- Table of Contents Forward-Looking Statements Statements in this report to the extent they are not statements of historical or present fact, including statements as to plans, outlook, objectives and future financial performance, are “forward-looking” statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “confident,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “hope,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and variations of such words and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause the Corporation’s actual results in the future to differ materially from expected results. The most significant factors known to the Corporation that may adversely affect the Corporation’s business, operations, industries, financial position or future financial performance are described later in this report under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” The Corporation cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement which speaks only as of the date made and to recognize forward-looking statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward- looking statements and from historical results due to the risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in this report, including under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” as well as others that the Corporation may consider immaterial or does not anticipate at this time. The risks and uncertainties described in this report, including those under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” are not exclusive and further information concerning the Corporation, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Corporation’s financial results or condition, may emerge from time to time. The Corporation assumes no obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. The Corporation advises you, however, to consult any further disclosures made on related subjects in future quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with or furnished to the SEC. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS The following risk factors and other information included in this report should be carefully considered. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition could be materially adversely affected. The existence of various unfavorable macroeconomic and industry factors, or deterioration of economic conditions, for a prolonged period could adversely affect our business operating results or financial condition. Office furniture industry sales are impacted by a variety of macroeconomic factors such as service-sector employment levels, corporate profits, small business confidence, commercial construction and office vacancy rates. Industry factors, such as corporate restructuring, technology changes, corporate relocations, health and safety concerns, including ergonomic considerations, and the globalization of companies also influence office furniture industry revenues. Despite economic recovery in the United States, generally, economic conditions remain uncertain. Employment has rebounded slowly and may not return to pre-recession level, which could decrease demand for our office furniture products and have adverse effects on our operating results. Hearth products industry sales are impacted by a variety of macroeconomic factors as well, including housing starts, overall employment levels, interest rates, consumer confidence, energy costs, disposable income and changing demographics. Industry factors, such as technology changes, health and safety concerns and environmental regulation, including indoor air quality standards, also influence hearth products industry revenues. Deterioration of the economic conditions or a slowdown in the recovery in the homebuilding industry and the hearth products market could decrease demand for our hearth products and have additional adverse effects on our operating results. Economic growth has slowed, and may continue to slow, in several key international markets, including China and India, which could have adverse effects on our international office furniture sales and our operating results. Deteriorating economic conditions could affect our business significantly, including: reduced demand for products; insolvency of our dealers resulting in increased provisions for credit losses; insolvency of our key suppliers resulting in product delays; inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products; decreased customer demand, including order delays or cancellations; and counter-party failures negatively impacting our treasury operations. Uncertainty surrounding the U.S. federal government, including the shutdown during fiscal 2013 and continued spending cuts, make it increasingly difficult for us, our customers and our suppliers to accurately forecast future product demand trends, which -10- Table of Contents could cause us to incur excess costs. Additionally, this forecasting difficulty could cause a shortage of products, labor or materials used in our products that could result in an inability to satisfy demand for our products and a loss of market share. We may need to take additional impairment charges related to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, which would adversely affect our results of operations. Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually, and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible an impairment may exist. As of December 28, 2013, we had goodwill of $287 million recorded on our balance sheet. We test for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of the year and whenever indicators of impairment exist. We test goodwill for impairment by first comparing the carrying value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting unit. If the fair value is determined to be less than carrying value, a second step is performed to determine the implied fair value of goodwill associated with the reporting unit. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, such excess represents the amount of goodwill impairment, and accordingly, such impairment is recognized. We estimate the fair values of the reporting units using discounted cash flows. Forecasts of future cash flows are based on our best estimate of longer term, broad market trends. We combine this trend data with estimates of current economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries where we have a presence, competitor behavior, the mix of product sales, commodity costs, wage rates, the level of manufacturing capacity and the pricing environment. In addition, estimates of fair value are impacted by estimates of the market-participant-derived weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these forecasts could significantly change the amount of impairment recorded, if any. We have two recently acquired reporting units within the office furniture segment where the fair value exceeds the carrying value by seven percent and six percent. There is approximately $26 million of total goodwill associated with these two reporting units. The office furniture and hearth products industries are highly competitive and, as a result, we may not always be successful. Both the office furniture and hearth products industries are highly competitive, with a significant number of competitors in both industries offering similar products. While competitive factors vary geographically and between differing sales situations, typical factors for both industries include: price; delivery and service; product design and features; product quality; strength of dealers and other distributors; and relationships with customers and key influencers, such as architects, designers, home-builders and facility managers. Our principal competitors in the office furniture industry include The Global Group, Haworth, Inc., Kimball International, Inc., Steelcase Inc., Herman Miller, Inc., Teknion Corporation, Virco Mfg. Corporaton, Krueger International Inc. (KI) and Knoll, Inc. Our principal competitors in the hearth products industry include Travis Industries Inc., Comvest Partners (Innovative Hearth Products), Vermont Castings Group, Wolf Steel Ltd. (Napoleon) and FPI Fireplace Products International Ltd. (Regency). In both industries, most of our top competitors have an installed base of products that can be a source of significant future sales through repeat and expansion orders. These competitors manufacture products with strong acceptance in the marketplace and are capable of developing products that have a competitive advantage over our products. Our continued success will depend on many factors, including our ability to continue to manufacture and market high quality, high performance products at competitive prices and our ability to adapt our business model to effectively compete in the highly competitive environments of both the office furniture and hearth products industries. Our success is also subject to our ability to sustain and grow our positive brand reputation and recognition among existing and potential customers and use our brands and trademarks effectively in entering new markets. In both the office furniture and hearth products industries, we also face significant price competition from our competitors and from new market entrants who primarily manufacture and source products from lower cost countries. Price competition impacts our ability to implement price increases or, in some cases, even maintain prices, which could lower our profit margins. In addition, we may not be able to maintain or raise the prices of our products in response to rising raw material prices and other inflationary pressures. The concentration of our customer base, changes in demand and order patterns from our customers, as well as the increased purchasing power of such customers, could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. We sell our products through multiple distribution channels. These distribution channels have been consolidating and may continue to consolidate in the future. Consolidation may result in a greater proportion of our sales being concentrated in fewer customers, including as a result of the recent merger of Office Depot, Inc. and OfficeMax Incorporated. The increased purchasing power exercised by larger customers may adversely affect the prices at which we can successfully offer our products. As a result of this consolidation, changes in the purchase patterns or the loss of a single customer may have a greater impact on our business, operating results or financial condition than such events would have had prior to the consolidation. -11- Table of Contents The growth in sales of private-label products by some of our largest office furniture customers may reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Private-label products are products sold under the name of the distributor or retailer, but manufactured by another party. Some of our largest customers have aggressive private-label initiatives to increase sales of office furniture. If successful, they may reduce our revenue and inhibit our ability to raise prices and may, in some cases, even force us to lower prices, which could result in an adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. Increases in basic commodity, raw material and component costs, as well as disruptions to the supply of basic commodities, raw materials and components, could adversely affect our profitability. Fluctuations in the price, availability and quality of the commodities, raw materials and components used by us in manufacturing could have an adverse effect on our costs of sales, profitability and our ability to meet customers' demand. We source commodities, raw materials and components from domestic and international suppliers for both our office furniture and hearth products. From both domestic and international suppliers, the cost, quality and availability of commodities, raw materials and components, including steel, our largest raw material category, have been significantly affected in recent years by, among other things, changes in global supply and demand, changes in laws and regulations (including tariffs and duties), changes in exchange rates and worldwide price levels, natural disasters, labor disputes, terrorism and political unrest or instability. These factors could lead to further price increases or supply interruptions in the future. Our profit margins could be adversely affected if commodity, raw material and component costs remain high or escalate further, and we are either unable to offset such costs through strategic sourcing initiatives and continuous improvement programs or, as a result of competitive market dynamics, unable to pass along a portion of the higher costs to our customers. The cost of energy could adversely affect our gross margins and profitability. Our gross margins and the profitability of our business operations are sensitive to the cost of energy because it is reflected in our cost of transportation, petroleum-based materials like plastics and operation of our manufacturing facilities. If the costs of petroleum-based products, operating our manufacturing facilities or transportation increase, it could adversely affect our gross margins and profitability. Our efforts to introduce new products to meet customer and workplace requirements may not be successful, which could limit our sales growth or cause our sales to decline. To meet the changing needs of our customers and keep pace with market trends in both the office furniture and hearth products industries, we periodically introduce new products. Trends include changes in workplace and home design and increases in the use of technology and evolving regulatory and industry requirements, including environmental, health, safety and similar standards for the workplace and home and for product performance. The introduction of new products in both industries requires the coordination of the design, manufacturing and marketing of such products, which may be affected by factors beyond our control. The design and engineering of certain new products can take up to a year or more, and further time may be required to achieve client acceptance. In addition, we may face difficulties introducing new products if we cannot successfully align ourselves with independent architects, home-builders and designers who are able to design, in a timely manner, high quality products consistent with our image and our customers' needs. Accordingly, the launch of any particular product may be later or less successful than we originally anticipated. Difficulties or delays introducing new products or lack of customer acceptance of new products could limit our sales growth or cause our sales to decline and may result in an adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. We have grown, and may continue to grow, our business through acquisitions and alliances, which could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. One of our growth strategies is to supplement our organic growth through acquisitions of, and or strategic alliances with, businesses with technologies or products complimenting or augmenting our existing products or distribution or adding new products or distribution to our business. In the past three years, we acquired Artcobell, an education furniture company, and BP Ergo, an office furniture company in India, both of which we continue to integrate into our business. The benefits of these acquisitions, or future acquisitions or alliances may take more time than expected to develop or integrate into our operations, and we cannot guarantee any completed or future acquisitions or alliances will in fact produce any benefits. In addition, acquisitions and alliances involve a number of risks, including, without limitation: • diversion of management’s attention, including significant management time devoted to integrating acquisitions; -12- Table of Contents • • • • • • difficulties in assimilating the operations and products of an acquired business or in realizing projected efficiencies, cost savings and revenue synergies; potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired businesses or adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; adverse impact on overall profitability if acquired businesses do not achieve the financial results projected in our valuation models; reallocation of amounts of capital from other operating initiatives or an increase in our leverage and debt service requirements to pay the acquisition purchase prices, which could in turn restrict our ability to access additional capital when needed or to pursue other important elements of our business strategy; inaccurate assessment of undisclosed, contingent or other liabilities or problems and unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition; and incorrect estimates made in accounting for acquisitions, incurrence of non-recurring charges and write-off of significant amounts of goodwill that could adversely affect our operating results. Our ability to grow through future acquisitions will depend, in part, on the availability of suitable acquisition candidates at an acceptable price, our ability to compete effectively for these acquisition candidates and the availability of capital to complete such acquisitions. These risks could be heightened if we complete several acquisitions within a relatively short period of time. In addition, there can be no assurance we will be able to continue to identify attractive opportunities or enter into any transactions with acceptable terms in the future. If an acquisition is completed, there can be no assurance we will be able to successfully integrate the acquired entity into our operations or achieve sales and profitability justifying our investment in such businesses. Any potential acquisition may not be successful and could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. We are subject to extensive environmental regulation and have exposure to potential environmental liabilities. The past and present operation and ownership by us of manufacturing facilities and real property are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to discharges in air, water and land, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances. Compliance with environmental regulations has not had a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position to date; however, compliance with current laws or more stringent laws or regulations which may be imposed on us in the future, stricter interpretation of existing laws or discoveries of contamination at our real property sites which occurred prior to our ownership or the advent of environmental regulation may require us to incur additional expenditures in the future, some of which may be material. Increasing healthcare costs could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. We provide healthcare benefits to the majority of our members and are self-insured. Healthcare costs have continued to rise over time, which increases our annual spending on healthcare and could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Our inability to improve the quality/capability of our network of independent dealers or the loss of a significant number of dealers could adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. In both the office furniture and hearth products industries, we rely in large part on a network of independent dealers to market our products to customers. We also rely upon these dealers to provide a variety of important specification, installation and after-market services to our customers. Our dealers may terminate their relationships with us at any time and for any reason. The loss or termination of a significant number of dealer relationships could cause difficulties for us in marketing and distributing our products, resulting in a decline in our sales, which may adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Our international operations expose us to risks related to conducting business in multiple jurisdictions outside the United States. During the past several years, we have experienced growth in our international operations and sales, including in China and India. We plan to continue to grow internationally. We primarily sell our products and report our financial results in U.S. dollars; however, our increased business in countries outside the United States exposes us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, such as the recent weakening of the Rupee in India. Paying our expenses in other currencies can result in a significant increase or decrease in the amount of those expenses in terms of U.S. dollars, which may affect our profits. In the future, any foreign currency appreciation relative to the U.S. dollar would increase our expenses that are denominated in that currency. Additionally, as we report currency in the U.S. dollar, our financial position is affected by the strength of the currencies in countries where we have operations relative to the strength of the U.S. dollar. -13- Table of Contents Further, certain countries have complex regulatory systems which impose administrative and legal requirements which make managing international operations more difficult, including approvals to transfer funds into certain countries. If we are unable to provide financial support to our international operations in a timely manner, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected. We periodically review our foreign currency exposure and evaluate whether we should enter into hedging transactions. Our international sales and operations are subject to a number of additional risks, including, without limitation: • • • • • • • • • • social and political turmoil, official corruption and civil and labor unrest; restrictive government actions, such as the imposition of trade quotas and tariffs and restrictions on transfers of funds; changes in labor laws and regulations affecting our ability to hire, retain or dismiss employees; the need to comply with multiple and potentially conflicting laws and regulations, including environmental and corporate laws and regulations; preference for locally branded products and laws and business practices favoring local competition; less effective protection of intellectual property and increased possibility of loss due to cyber-theft; unfavorable business conditions or economic instability in any particular country or region; infrastructure disruptions; potentially conflicting cultural and business practices; and difficulty in obtaining distribution and support. Restrictions imposed by the terms of our credit facility and note purchase agreement may limit our operating and financial flexibility. Our credit facility and note purchase agreement, dated as of April 6, 2006, pursuant to which we issued $150 million of senior, unsecured notes designated as Series 2006-A Senior Notes, limit our ability to finance operations, service debt or engage in other business activities that may be in our interest. Specifically, our credit facility restricts our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create or incur certain liens with respect to any of our properties or assets, engage in lines of business substantially different than those currently conducted by us, sell, lease, license or dispose of any of our assets, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, make certain restricted payments or take certain restricted actions and enter into certain sale-leaseback arrangements. Our note purchase agreement contains customary restrictive covenants that, among other things, place limits on our ability to incur liens on assets, incur additional debt, transfer or sell our assets, merge or consolidate with other persons or enter into material transactions with affiliates. Our credit facility and note purchase agreement also require us to maintain certain financial covenants. Our failure to comply with the obligations under our credit facility may result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, may cause accelerated repayment of the indebtedness under the credit facility and could result in a cross default under our note purchase agreement. We cannot be certain we will have sufficient funds available to pay any accelerated repayments or we will have the ability to refinance accelerated repayments on terms favorable to us or at all. Costs related to product defects, including product liability costs, could adversely affect our profitability. We incur various expenses related to product defects, including product warranty costs, product recall and retrofit costs and product liability costs. These expenses relative to product sales vary and could increase. We use chemicals and materials in our products and include components in our products from external suppliers, which we believe are safe and appropriate for their designated use; however, harmful effects may become known which could subject us to litigation, including health-related litigation, and significant losses. We maintain reserves for product defect-related costs based on estimates and our knowledge of circumstances indicating the need for such reserves. We cannot, however, be certain these reserves will be adequate to cover actual product defect-related claims in the future. We also purchase insurance coverage to reduce our exposure to significant levels of product liability claims and maintain a reserve for our self-insured losses based upon estimates of the aggregate liability using claims experience and actuarial assumptions, but we cannot be certain insurance would cover all losses related to product claims. Incorrect estimates or any significant increase in the rate of our product defect expenses could have a material adverse effect on operations. We may require additional capital in the future, which may not be available or may be available only on unfavorable terms. Our capital requirements depend on many factors, including capital improvements, tooling, new product development and acquisitions. To the extent our existing capital is insufficient to meet these requirements and cover any losses, we may need to raise additional funds through financings or curtail our growth and reduce our assets. Our ability to generate cash depends on economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that may be beyond our control. Future borrowings or financings may not be available to us under our credit facility or otherwise in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt or meet our liquidity needs. -14- Table of Contents Any equity or debt financing, if available at all, could have terms unfavorable to us. In addition, financings could result in dilution to our shareholders or the securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common stock. If our need for capital arises because of significant losses, the occurrence of these losses may make it more difficult for us to raise the necessary capital. Our sales to the U.S. government are declining and our sales to the U.S. state and local governments are subject to uncertain future funding levels and federal, state and local procurement laws and are governed by restrictive contract terms; any of these factors could limit current or future business. We derive a portion of our revenue from sales to various U.S. federal, state and local government agencies and departments. Our ability to compete successfully for and retain business with the U.S. government, as well as with state and local governments, is highly dependent on cost-effective performance. Our government business is highly sensitive to changes in procurement laws; national, international, state and local public priorities; and budgets at all levels of government, which have recently experienced downward pressure and, in the case of the federal budget, are subject to uncertainty due to continuing budget cuts. In fiscal years 2013 and 2012, our sales to the U.S. government have decreased 28% and 26%, respectively, and may continue to decline going forward, which could adversely impact our operating results. Our contracts with government entities are subject to various statutes and regulations that apply to companies doing business with the government. The U.S. government as well as state and local governments can typically terminate or modify their contracts with us either for their convenience or if we default by failing to perform under the terms of the applicable contract. A termination arising out of our default could expose us to liability and impede our ability to compete in the future for contracts and orders with agencies and departments at all levels of government. Moreover, we are subject to investigation and audit for compliance with the requirements governing government contracts, including requirements related to procurement integrity, export controls, employment practices, the accuracy of records and reporting of costs. If we were found to not be a responsible supplier or to have committed fraud or certain criminal offenses, we could be suspended or debarred from all further federal, state or local government contracting. Increased government focus on enforcement may significantly increase our operating costs. The federal government has increased its focus on enforcement under a wide range of laws and regulations impacting our business, particularly in the following areas: • • • • • • • antitrust and competition; foreign corrupt practices; government contracting; securities and public company reporting; labor and employment practices; fraud and abuse; and tax reporting. Should we become the target of a government investigation or enforcement action, we could incur significant costs and suffer damage to our reputation which could adversely impact our business, operating results or financial condition. Our implementation and use of a new business software system, and accompanying transformation of our business processes, could result in problems that could negatively impact our business and results of operations. We are engaged in a multi-year, company-wide program to implement new integrated software systems (the "System") to support and streamline our business processes. We expect implementation of the System will require transformation of business and financial processes to realize the full benefits of the project. Significant efforts are required to design, test and implement the System, requiring investment of resources, including additional selling, general and administrative and capital expenditures. There can be no assurance other issues relating to System implementation will not occur, including compatibility issues, integration challenges and delays, and higher than expected implementation costs. Additionally, when implemented, the System could function improperly or not deliver the projected benefits, which could significantly disrupt our business, including our ability to provide quotes, process orders, ship products, invoice customers, process payments, generate management and financial reports and otherwise run our business. Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected if we experience problems related to the System. -15- Table of Contents We rely on information technology systems to manage numerous aspects of our business, and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of business, we rely upon information technology networks and systems to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage numerous aspects of our business and provide information to management. Additionally, we collect and store sensitive data of our customers and suppliers, as well as personally identifiable information of our employees, in data centers and on information technology networks. The secure operation of these information technology networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information, is critical to our business operations and strategy. These networks and systems, despite security and precautionary measures, are vulnerable to, among other things, damage and interruption from power loss or natural disasters, computer system and network failures, loss of telecommunications services, physical and electronic loss of data, security breaches, hackers and employee misuse. We may face unauthorized attempts by hackers seeking to harm us or as a result of industrial espionage to penetrate our network security and gain access to our network, steal proprietary data, including design, sales or personally identifiable information, introduce malicious software or interrupt our internal systems, manufacturing or distribution. Though we attempt to prevent and detect these incidents, we may not be successful. Any disruption of our information technology networks or systems, or access to or disclosure of information stored in or transmitted by our systems, could result in legal claims and damages, disrupt operations, result in competitive disadvantage and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Natural disasters, acts of God, force majeure events or other catastrophic events may impact the Corporation's production capacity and, in turn, negatively impact profitability. Natural disasters, acts of God, force majeure events or other catastrophic events, including severe weather, military action, terrorist attacks, power interruptions and fires, could disrupt operations and likewise the ability to produce or deliver our products. Several of our production facilities, members and key management are located within a small geographic area in eastern Iowa and a natural disaster or catastrophe in the area could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations and business conditions. Further, several of our production facilities are single-site manufacturers of certain products, and an adverse event affecting any of those facilities could significantly delay production of certain products and adversely affect our operations and business conditions. Members are an integral part of our business and events such as an epidemic could reduce the availability of members reporting for work. In the event we experience a temporary or permanent interruption in our ability to produce or deliver product, revenues could be reduced, and business could be materially adversely affected. In addition, any continuing disruption in our computer system could adversely affect our ability to receive and process customers orders, manufacture products and ship products on a timely basis and could adversely affect relations with customers, potentially resulting in reduction in orders from customers or loss of customers. We maintain insurance to help protect us from costs relating to some of these events, but it may not be sufficient or paid in a timely manner in the event we suffer such an event. Our business is subject to a number of other miscellaneous risks that may adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Other miscellaneous risks include, without limitation: • • • • • • • reduced demand for our storage products caused by changes in office technology, including the change from paper record storage to electronic record storage; our ability to realize cost savings and productivity improvements from our cost containment, business simplification, manufacturing consolidation and logistical realignment initiatives; volatility in the market price and trading volume of equity securities may adversely affect the market price for our common stock; our ability to protect our intellectual property, including trade secrets and key business operations data; labor or other manufacturing inefficiencies due to items such as new product introductions, a new operating system or turnover in personnel; our ability to effectively manage working capital and maintain our effective tax rate; potential claims by third parties that we infringed upon their intellectual property rights; -16- Table of Contents • our insurance may not adequately (1) insulate us from expenses for product defects and the negligent acts and omissions of our members and agents and (2) compensate us for damages to our facilities and equipment and loss of business; and • our ability to retain our experienced management team and recruit other key personnel. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. -17- Table of Contents ITEM 2. PROPERTIES The Corporation maintains its corporate headquarters in Muscatine, Iowa, and conducts operations at locations throughout the United States, Canada, China, Hong Kong, India and Taiwan, which house manufacturing, distribution and retail operations and offices totaling an aggregate of approximately 10.7 million square feet. Of this total, approximately 1.6 million square feet are leased. Although the plants are of varying ages, the Corporation believes they are well maintained, equipped with modern and efficient equipment, in good operating condition and suitable for the purposes for which they are being used. The Corporation has sufficient capacity to increase output at most locations by increasing the use of overtime or the number of production shifts employed. The Corporation's principal manufacturing and distribution facilities (200,000 square feet in size or larger) are as follows: Location Cedartown, Georgia Dongguan, China Approximate Square Feet 550,000 1,007,716 Owned or Leased Owned Owned Florence, Alabama 304,365 Owned Hickory, North Carolina 206,316 Owned Lake City, Minnesota Milan, Illinois Mt. Pleasant, Iowa Muscatine, Iowa Muscatine, Iowa Muscatine, Iowa Muscatine, Iowa Muscatine, Iowa Nagpur, India Orleans, Indiana Temple, Texas Temple, Texas Wayland, New York 241,500 239,452 288,006 272,900 578,284 236,100 636,250 237,800 355,135 1,196,946 392,134 354,000 716,484 Owned Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Owned Description of Use Manufacturing nonwood office furniture Manufacturing wood and nonwood casegoods and seating office furniture (1) Manufacturing wood and nonwood casegoods office furniture Manufacturing wood casegoods and seating office furniture Manufacturing metal prefabricated fireplaces Warehousing office furniture components Manufacturing metal prefabricated fireplaces (1) Manufacturing nonwood casegoods office furniture Warehousing office furniture Manufacturing nonwood casegoods office furniture Manufacturing nonwood office furniture Manufacturing nonwood seating office furniture Manufacturing office furniture Manufacturing wood and nonwood office furniture (1) Manufacturing office furniture Warehousing office furniture Manufacturing wood casegoods and seating office furniture (1) (1) Also includes a regional warehouse/distribution center Other Corporation facilities, under 200,000 square feet in size, are located in various communities throughout the United States, Canada, China, Hong Kong, India and Taiwan. These facilities total approximately 2.3 million square feet with approximately 1.2 million square feet used for the manufacture and distribution of office furniture and approximately .9 million square feet for hearth products. Of this total, approximately 1.0 million square feet are leased. The Corporation also leases sales showroom space in office furniture market centers in several major metropolitan areas. There are no major encumbrances on Corporation-owned properties. Refer to Property, Plant, and Equipment in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for related cost, accumulated depreciation and net book value data. -18- Table of Contents ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Corporation is involved in various kinds of disputes and legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of its business, including pending litigation, environmental remediation, taxes and other claims. It is the Corporation’s opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, that liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, cash flows or on the Corporation’s quarterly or annual operating results when resolved in a future period. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. -19- Table of Contents TABLE I EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT December 28, 2013 Name Stan A. Askren Family Relationship None Age 53 Steven M. Bradford 56 None Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer President Director Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Position Position Held Since Other Business Experience During Past Five Years 2004 2004 2003 2003 2008 2007 2005 2003 2008 2008 2010 2014 2011 2008 2006 2003 2008 Vice President and Regional General Counsel for The Americas, Imperial Chemical Industries PLC (2003-08); General Counsel, North America, ICI Paints (2004-08); President ICI Group Services (2004-08) Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2001-08) Allsteel, Inc. President, (2008-2014); Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary HNI (2005-08); Vice Corporation President, Sales and Marketing The HON Company LLC (2007-08) Vice President, Marketing, The HON Company LLC (2006-08) Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Asia, Whirlpool Corporation (2006-08) Gary L. Carlson 63 None Vice President, Member and Community Relations Bradley D. Determan 52 None Jerald K. Dittmer 56 None Jeffrey D. Lorenger 48 None Executive Vice President President, Hearth & Home Technologies LLC* Executive Vice President, President, The HON Company LLC* Executive Vice President President, HNI Contract Furniture Group Donald T. Mead Marco V. Molinari Kurt A. Tjaden 54 54 50 None None None Executive Vice President President, The Gunlocke Company L.L.C.* Executive Vice President President, HNI International Inc.* Vice President and Chief Financial Officer *HNI Corporation subsidiary -20- Table of Contents PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES The Corporation’s common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the trading symbol HNI. As of year-end 2013, the Corporation had 7,538 stockholders of record. Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, St. Paul, Minnesota, serves as the Corporation’s transfer agent and registrar of its common stock. Shareholders may report a change of address or make inquiries by writing or calling: Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, P.O. Box 64874, St. Paul, MN 55164-0854 or telephone 800/468-9716. Information regarding historical sale prices of and dividends paid on the Corporation's common stock is presented in the Investor Information section which follows the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report and is incorporated herein by reference. The Corporation expects to continue its policy of paying regular quarterly cash dividends. Dividends have been paid each quarter since the Corporation paid its first dividend in 1955. The average dividend payout percentage for the most recent three-year period has been 105% of prior year earnings. Future dividends are dependent on future earnings, capital requirements and the Corporation’s financial condition, and are declared in the sole discretion of the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities: The following is a summary of share repurchase activity during the quarter ended December 28, 2013. (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased (1) (b) Average Price Paid per Share or Unit 22,000 209,000 120,900 351,900 $39.11 $38.57 $39.26 (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs $100,093,227 $92,032,239 $87,286,015 (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 22,000 209,000 120,900 351,900 Period 9/29/13 - 10/26/13 10/27/13 - 11/23/13 11/24/13 - 12/28/13 Total (1) No shares were purchased outside of a publicly announced plan or program. The Corporation repurchases shares under previously announced plans authorized by the Board as follows: • Plan announced November 9, 2007, providing share repurchase authorization of $200,000,000 with no specific expiration date. • No repurchase plans expired or were terminated during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, nor do any plans exist under which the Corporation does not intend to make further purchases. -21- Table of Contents ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA — FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY Per Common Share Data (Basic and Dilutive) Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Attributable to HNI Corporation – basic Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Attributable to HNI Corporation – diluted Net Income (Loss) Attributable to HNI Corporation – basic Net Income (Loss) Attributable to HNI Corporation – diluted Cash Dividends Book Value – year-end Net Working Capital – year-end Operating Results (Thousands of Dollars) Net Sales Gross Profit as a % of Net Sales Interest Expense Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations as a % of Net Sales Discontinued Operations Net Income (Loss) Attributable to HNI Corporation Net Income (Loss) Attributable to HNI Corporation as a % of Net Sales Cash Dividends % Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity Depreciation and Amortization Financial Position (Thousands of Dollars) Current Assets Current Liabilities Working Capital Current Ratio Total Assets $ $ $ $ $ 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 $ 1.41 $ 1.08 $ 1.03 $ 0.66 $ (0.04) 1.39 1.41 1.39 0.96 9.70 0.48 1.07 1.08 1.07 0.95 9.35 0.29 1.01 1.03 1.01 0.92 9.34 1.10 0.65 0.60 0.59 0.86 9.10 1.14 (0.04) (0.14) (0.14) 0.86 9.30 1.42 $ 2,059,964 $ 2,004,003 $ 1,833,450 $ 1,686,728 $ 1,623,327 34.7% 9,906 $ 63,369 34.4% 34.9% 34.7% 34.7 % $ 10,865 48,326 $ 11,951 45,748 11,903 29,681 $ 12,080 (1,598) 3.1% — $ 2.4% — $ 2.5% — $ 1.8% (2,558) (0.1)% $ (4,661) 63,683 48,967 45,986 26,941 (6,442) $ $ $ 3.1% 43,494 14.9% 46,621 433,228 411,584 21,644 1.05 $ $ $ 2.4% 43,041 11.7% 43,360 402,375 389,171 13,204 1.03 2.5% 41,250 11.1% 46,287 431,504 382,270 49,234 1.13 $ 1,134,705 $ 1,077,066 $ 1,051,722 1.6% (0.4)% 38,737 6.5% 58,630 $ $ 38,667 (1.5)% 74,867 405,621 $ 357,779 354,701 50,920 1.14 293,619 64,160 1.22 995,340 $ 991,834 5.8% 0.7 % 150,111 $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ $ % Return on Beginning Assets Employed 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations $ 150,197 $ 150,372 $ 150,540 Shareholders’ Equity Current Share Data 436,328 420,359 419,057 407,985 419,284 Number of Shares Outstanding at Year-End 44,981,865 44,950,703 44,855,207 44,840,701 45,093,379 Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding During Year – basic Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding During Year – diluted 45,250,665 45,211,385 44,803,248 44,993,934 44,888,809 45,956,280 45,819,979 45,694,278 45,808,704 44,888,809 Number of Shareholders of Record at Year-End 7,538 7,790 7,259 7,866 8,257 Other Operational Data Capital Expenditures (Thousands of Dollars) $ Members (Employees) at Year-End $ 60,977 10,310 39,473 10,352 $ 27,795 $ 25,683 $ 16,017 9,490 8,470 8,748 -22- Table of Contents ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion of the Corporation’s historical results of operations and of its liquidity and capital resources should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation and related notes. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this report. Overview The Corporation has two reportable segments: office furniture and hearth products. The Corporation is the second largest office furniture manufacturer in the world and the nation’s leading manufacturer and marketer of gas and wood burning fireplaces. The Corporation utilizes its split and focus, decentralized business model to deliver value to its customers with various brands and selling models. The Corporation is focused on growing its existing businesses while seeking out and developing new opportunities for growth. The Corporation delivered strong profit improvement in 2013 despite challenging market conditions and a slow economy. Growth in the supplies-driven channel of the office furniture segment was solid despite the heavy weight of economic and political uncertainty on small business confidence. Growth in the contract channel of the office furniture segment was a result of strong project activity and market demand for new products. Both channels were impacted by a steep decline in sales to the federal government. The Corporation's hearth products segment leveraged its leading market position to increase sales and drive significant profit improvement as the housing market continued to recover. The Corporation remained committed to long-term profitable growth across its core businesses and increased the amount of focused investments in selling, marketing, manufacturing and product initiatives. Net sales during 2013 were $2.1 billion, an increase of 2.8 percent, compared to net sales of $2.0 billion in 2012. The sales increase was driven by growth in the new construction and remodel/retrofit channels of the hearth products segment. The growth in the supplies-driven and contract channels of the office furniture segment was offset by a large decline in federal government sales and the impact of divestitures of several small businesses. Management is positive about the office furniture and hearth markets. The Corporation will continue to invest in selling, marketing and product initiatives and remain focused on improving operations and reducing cost. -23- Table of Contents Results of Operations The following table sets forth the percentage of consolidated net sales represented by certain items reflected in the Corporation’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the periods indicated. Fiscal Net Sales Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges Operating income Interest income (expense) net Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes Income taxes Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to HNI Corporation 2013 2012 2011 100.0% 65.3 34.7 29.6 — 5.1 (0.5) 4.7 1.6 — 100.0% 65.6 34.4 29.9 0.1 4.4 (0.5) 3.9 1.5 — 100.0% 65.1 34.9 30.2 0.2 4.4 (0.6) 3.8 1.3 — 3.1% 2.4% 2.5% Net Sales Net sales during 2013 were $2.1 billion, an increase of 2.8 percent, compared to net sales of $2.0 billion in 2012. The office furniture segment experienced better price realization and increased volume in commercial markets offset by a 28 percent decline in sales to the federal government. The hearth products segment experienced increased volume and better price realization in both the new construction and remodel/retrofit channels. Compared to prior year, divestitures of several small businesses, including office furniture dealers, partially offset by the acquisition of BP Ergo, reduced sales $27.5 million. Net sales during 2012 were $2.0 billion, an increase of 9.3 percent, compared to net sales of $1.8 billion in 2011. Both the office furniture segment and the hearth products segment experienced increased volume and better price realization. Acquisitions contributed $93.0 million or 5.1 percent sales growth in 2012. Gross Profit Gross profit as a percent of net sales increased 0.3 percentage points in 2013 as compared to 2012 due to higher volume, better price realization and lower material costs offset partially by unfavorable mix, new product ramp-up and operation reconfiguration costs to meet changing market demand. Gross profit as a percent of net sales decreased 0.5 percentage points in 2012 as compared to 2011 due to unfavorable mix, investments to improve operations, new product ramp-up and impact of acquisitions offset partially by higher volume, better price realization and lower material costs. Selling and Administrative Expenses Selling and administrative expenses increased 1.6 percent in 2013 and 8.2 percent in 2012. The increase in 2013 was due to volume related expenses, investments in selling and growth initiatives, higher incentive-based compensation and a loss on sale of a small non-core office furniture business of $2.5 million. The increase in 2012 was due to volume related expenses, investments in selling and growth initiatives, higher incentive-based compensation and costs associated with acquisitions. Selling and administrative expenses include freight expense for shipments to customers, product development costs and amortization expense of intangible assets. Refer to Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the comparative expense levels for these items. Restructuring and Impairment Charges During 2011, the Corporation made the decision to transition out of its Lithia Springs, Georgia office furniture distribution center and the transition was completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. The distribution center was operated by a third-party logistics provider. The Corporation added distribution capacity to its Cedartown, Georgia office furniture manufacturing facility and -24- Table of Contents distribution center to make up for the loss of the Lithia Springs distribution center. To make room for the additional distribution capacity, the Corporation consolidated some office furniture manufacturing production from the Cedartown facility into exisiting office furniture manufacturing facilities in Muscatine, Iowa. In addition, during 2011, the Corporation made the decision to consolidate some office furniture manufacturing production from its Hickory, North Carolina facility into its Wayland, New York facility. In connection with the closure, consolidations and realignment, the Corporation recorded $2.0 million of pre-tax charges which included $0.2 million of accelerated depreciation of machinery and equipment recorded in cost of sales and $1.8 million of severance and facility exit costs recorded as restructuring costs in 2011. During 2012, the Corporation recorded current period charges which included $0.3 million of accelerated depreciation of machinery and equipment recorded in cost of sales and $1.5 million of severance and facility exit costs recorded as restructuring costs. These included impairment of leasehold improvements of $0.2 million which was a non-cash transaction. The Corporation made the decision to close certain hearth products retail and distribution locations during the first quarter of 2011. A pre-tax charge of $0.4 million was recorded for severance and facility exit costs. During 2010, the Corporation made the decision to close an office furniture facility in Salisbury, North Carolina and consolidate production into existing office furniture manufacturing facilities. During 2011, the Corporation incurred $0.6 million of current period charges recorded as restructuring costs. During 2010, the Corporation completed the shutdown of an office furniture facility in South Gate, California and consolidated production into existing office furniture manufacturing facilities. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Corporation incurred $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million of current period charges due to ongoing costs related to a vacant building recorded as restructuring costs, respectively. Operating Income Operating income increased $18.4 million to $106.0 million in 2013, compared to $87.6 million in 2012. The increase was due to higher volume, better price realization, lower material costs and distribution network realignment savings and lower restructuring costs. These were offset partially by new product ramp-up, facility reconfiguration to meet changing market demands, selling, marketing and product initiatives, higher incentive-based compensation and a loss on the sale of a small non-core business. Operating income increased $6.1 million to $87.6 million in 2012, compared to $81.5 million in 2011. The increase was due to higher volume, better price realization and lower material costs. These were offset partially by investments in operations, selling, marketing and product initiatives, and higher incentive-based compensation. Income Taxes The provision for income taxes for continuing operations reflect an effective tax rate of 34.5 percent, 37.7 percent and 34.8 percent for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The current year decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by the federal research and development credit extension which was effective from January 2, 2013, resulting in both the 2012 and 2013 related credits of $1.3 million each being recognized in fiscal 2013. Net Income Attributable to HNI Corporation Net income attributable to HNI Corporation increased 30.1 percent to $63.7 million in 2013 compared to $49.0 million in 2012 and $46.0 million in 2011. Net income per diluted share increased 29.9 percent to $1.39 in 2013 compared to $1.07 in 2012 and $1.01 in 2010. Office Furniture Office furniture comprised 82 percent, 84 percent and 83 percent of consolidated net sales for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Net sales for office furniture decreased $2.1 million or 0.1 percent in 2013 to $1.685 billion compared to $1.687 billion in 2012 including increased price realization of $30 million. Compared to prior year, divestitures of several small businesses, including office furniture dealers, partially offset by the acquisition of BP Ergo, reduced sales by $27.5 million. The Corporation experienced growth in both the supplies-driven and contract channels which was more than offset by a large decline in sales to the federal government. Net sales for office furniture increased 10.4 percent in 2012 to $1.687 billion compared to $1.528 billion in 2011 including increased price realization of $41 million. Acquisitions contributed $93 million of sales in 2012. The Corporation experienced growth in both the supplies-driven and contract channels partially offset by a large decline in sales to the federal government. BIFMA reported 2013 shipments up 1 percent from 2012 levels which were down 1 percent from 2011 levels. -25- Table of Contents Operating profit as a percent of net sales was 5.8 percent in 2013, 5.4 percent in 2012 and 6.5 percent in 2011. The increase in operating margins in 2013 was due to better price realization, lower material costs, distribution network realignment savings and lower restructuring costs. These were partially offset by unfavorable mix, new product ramp-up, facility reconfiguration costs to meet changing market demands and loss on the sale of a small non-core business. The decrease in operating margins in 2012 was due to unfavorable mix, investments to improve operations, new product ramp-up, investments in growth initiatives and impact of acquisitions. These were partially offset by increased volume, better price realization and lower restructuring costs. Hearth Products Hearth products sales increased $58.1 million or 18.3 percent in 2013 to $375 million compared to $317 million in 2012 including increased price realization of $5 million. The sales increase was also due to an increase in both the new construction channel due to housing market recovery and the remodel/retrofit channel due to strong remodeling activity. Hearth products sales increased 3.7 percent in 2012 to $317 million compared to $305 million in 2011 including increased price realization of $5 million. The sales increase was also due to an increase in the new construction channel offset partially by a decrease in the remodel/retrofit channel. Operating profit as a percent of sales in 2013 was 12.5 percent compared to 8.4 percent in 2012 and 4.8 percent in 2011. The increase in operating margins in 2013 was due to higher volume, better price realization and lower material costs. These were partially offset by investments in growth initiatives and higher incentive-based compensation. The increase in operating margins in 2012 was due to higher volume and better price realization. These were partially offset by investments in selling and marketing initiatives. Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flow – Operating Activities Cash generated from operating activities in 2013 totaled $165.0 million compared to $144.8 million generated in 2012 due to increased net income and certain non-cash items. Changes in working capital balances resulted in a $11.5 million source of cash in 2013 compared to $32.9 million in the prior year. Cash generated from operating activities in 2011 totaled $134.3 million and changes in working capital balances resulted in a $12.9 million source of cash. The source of cash related to working capital balances in 2013 was primarily driven from lower inventory of $1.6 million and increased current liabilities of $30.4 million. The increase in current liabilities is comprised of a $14.6 million increase in trade accounts payable, a $11.3 million increase in other accruals, namely compensation, marketing and freight expense accruals and a $4.5 million increase in tax-related accruals. These sources of cash were offset partially by a $21.0 million increase in trade receivables due to increased sales during the fourth quarter. The source of cash related to working capital balances in 2012 was primarily driven from lower inventory of $9.5 million and increased current liabilities of $32.2 million. The increase in current liabilities is comprised of a $25.4 million increase in trade accounts payable, a $2.1 million increase in other accruals, namely compensation and marketing expense accruals and a $4.7 million increase in tax-related accruals. These sources of cash were offset partially by a $7.0 million increase in trade receivables due to increased sales during the fourth quarter. The source of cash related to working capital balances in 2011 was primarily driven from increased current liabilities of $35.4 million. The increase in current liabilities is comprised of a $29.5 million increase in trade accounts payable, a $10.3 million increase in other accruals, namely compensation and marketing expense accruals, offset by a $4.4 million decrease in tax-related accruals. These sources of cash were offset partially by a $6.9 million increase in trade receivables and higher inventory of $11.3 million due to increased sales during the fourth quarter. The Corporation places special emphasis on management and control of working capital with a particular focus on trade receivables and inventory levels. The success achieved in managing receivables is in large part a result of doing business with quality customers and maintaining close communication with them. Management believes recorded trade receivable valuation allowances at the end of 2013 are adequate to cover the risk of potential bad debts. Allowances for non-collectible trade receivables, as a percent of gross trade receivables, totaled 2.6 percent, 2.4 percent and 2.3 percent at the end of fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Corporation’s inventory turns were 15, 14 and 16, for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. -26- Table of Contents Cash Flow – Investing Activities Capital expenditures, including capitalized software, were $78.9 million in 2013, $60.3 million in 2012 and $31.1 million in 2011. These expenditures continue to focus on machinery and equipment and tooling required to support new products, continuous improvements in our manufacturing processes and cost savings initiatives as well as the implementation of new integrated information systems to support business process transformation. The Corporation anticipates capital expenditures for 2014 to total $90 to $95 million, primarily related to new products, operational process improvements and capabilities and the business process transformation project referred to above. In 2012, the investing activities reflected a net cash outflow of $25.5 million related to the acquisition of BP Ergo and $1.5 million related to the acquisition of a pellet stove business. The addition of BP Ergo provides the Corporation a presence in the India office furniture market. In 2011, investing activities reflected a net cash outflow of $55 million related to the acquisition of Artcobell. The addition of Artcobell increased the Corporation's presence in the educational furniture market. Refer to the Business Combination note in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. In 2011, the Corporation completed the sale of a facility located in Owensboro, Kentucky, a facility located in Salisbury, North Carolina and excess land located in Meadville, Pennsylvania. The proceeds from these sales of $3 million are reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as “Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment” for 2011. Cash Flow – Financing Activities On September 28, 2011, the Corporation amended and restated its existing revolving credit facility dated June 11, 2010. The Corporation increased its borrowing capacity from $150 million to $250 million and has the option to increase its borrowing capacity by an additional $100 million. The Corporation also extended the term to the earlier of (i) September 28, 2016 or (ii) the date 90 days prior to the maturity date of the Corporation's senior notes (April 6, 2016), subject to certain exceptions. The Corporation effectively decreased interest costs. Amounts borrowed under the credit agreement may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time. The Corporation paid approximately $1.2 million of debt issuance costs that are being amortized straight-line over the term of the credit agreement. During 2013 net borrowings under the revolving credit facility peaked at $69 million. As of December 28, 2013, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility. In 2006, the Corporation refinanced $150 million of borrowings outstanding under its prior revolving credit facility with 5.54 percent, ten-year unsecured Senior Notes due in 2016 issued through the private placement debt market. Interest payments are due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year and the principal is due in a lump sum in 2016. Additional borrowing capacity of $250 million is available through the revolving credit facility in the event cash generated from operations should be inadequate to meet future needs. The Corporation does not currently expect access to future capital to be a constraint on planned growth. Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations, was 26% of total capitalization as of December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The credit agreement governing the revolving credit facility and the note purchase agreement pertaining to the Senior Notes contain covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to: incur additional indebtedness and lease obligations and make guarantees; create liens on assets; engage in any material line of business substantially different from existing lines of business; sell assets; • • • • • make investments, loans and advances, including acquisitions; • • • engage in sale-leaseback transactions in excess of $50 million in the aggregate; repay the Senior Notes or enter into certain amendments thereof; and engage in certain transactions with affiliates. The credit agreement governing the revolving credit facility contains a number of covenants, including covenants requiring maintenance of the following financial ratios as of the end of any fiscal quarter: • • a consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 4.0 to 1.0, based upon the ratio of (a) consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) for the last four fiscal quarters to (b) the sum of consolidated interest charges; and a consolidated leverage ratio of not greater than 3.0 to 1.0, based upon the ratio of (a) the quarter-end consolidated funded indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement) to (b) consolidated EBITDA for the last four fiscal quarters; or -27- Table of Contents • a consolidated leverage ratio of not greater than 3.5 to 1.0, based upon the ratio of (a) the quarter-end consolidated funded indebtedness to (b) consolidated EBITDA for the last four fiscal quarters following any qualifying debt financed acquisition. The note purchase agreement governing the Senior Notes also contains a number of covenants, including a covenant requiring maintenance of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the note purchase agreement) of not greater than 3.5 to 1.0, based upon the ratio of (a) the quarter-end consolidated funded indebtedness (as defined in the note purchase agreement) to (b) consolidated EBITDA for the last four fiscal quarters. The revolving credit facility and Senior Notes are the primary sources of committed funding from which the Corporation finances its planned capital expenditures, strategic initiatives such as repurchases of common stock and certain working capital needs. Non- compliance with the various financial covenant ratios could prevent the Corporation from being able to access further borrowings under the revolving credit facility, require immediate repayment of all amounts outstanding with respect to the revolving credit facility and Senior Notes and increase the cost of borrowing. The most restrictive of the financial covenants is the consolidated leverage ratio requirement of 3.0 to 1.0 included in the credit agreement governing the revolving credit facility. Under the credit agreement, adjusted EBITDA is defined as consolidated net income before interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and amortization of intangibles, as well as non-cash nonrecurring charges and all non-cash items increasing net income. At December 28, 2013, the Corporation was well below this ratio at 1.0 and was in compliance with all of the covenants and other restrictions in the credit agreement and note purchase agreement. The Corporation currently expects to remain in compliance over the next twelve months. During 2013, the Corporation repurchased 740,000 shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $27.5 million, or an average price of $37.15. The Board authorized $200 million on August 8, 2006, and an additional $200 million on November 9, 2007, for repurchases of the Corporation’s common stock. As of December 28, 2013 approximately $87.3 million of this authorized amount remained unspent. During 2012, the Corporation repurchased 800,000 shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $21.0 million, or an average price of $26.28. During 2011, the Corporation repurchased 323,965 shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $10.0 million, or an average price of $30.87. A cash dividend has been paid every quarter since April 15, 1955, and quarterly dividends are expected to continue. Cash dividends were $0.96 per common share for 2013, $0.95 for 2012 and $0.92 for 2011. The last quarterly dividend increase was from $0.23 to $0.24 per common share effective with the June 1, 2012 dividend payment for shareholders of record at the close of business on May 18, 2012. The average dividend payout percentage for the most recent three-year period has been 105 percent of prior year earnings or 34 percent of prior year cash flow from operating activities. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $72.3 million at the end of 2013 compared to $49.0 million at the end of 2012 and $82.0 million at the end of 2011. These funds, coupled with cash from future operations, borrowing capacity under the existing facility and the ability to access capital markets are expected to be adequate to fund operations and satisfy cash flow needs for at least the next twelve months. As of the end of 2013, $15.2 million of cash was held overseas and considered permanently reinvested. If such amounts were repatriated it could result in additional tax expense to the Corporation. The Corporation does not believe asserting this cash as permanently reinvested will have any impact on its liquidity. -28- Table of Contents Contractual Obligations The following table discloses the Corporation’s obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts: (In thousands) Long-term debt obligations, including estimated interest (1) Capital lease obligations Operating lease obligations Purchase obligations (2) Other long-term obligations (3) Total Payments Due by Period Total Less than 1 Year 1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years More than 5 Years $ 169,157 $ 8,678 $ 160,479 $ 237 102,059 67,406 37,899 129 28,753 67,406 4,285 108 44,852 — 10,374 — 14,387 — 3,692 $ 376,758 $ 109,251 $ 215,813 $ 18,079 $ — — 14,067 — 19,548 33,615 (1) Interest has been included for all debt at the fixed rate in effect as of December 28, 2013, as applicable. (2) Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable, legally binding and specify all significant terms, including the quantity to be purchased, the price to be paid and the timing of the purchase. (3) Other long-term obligations represent payments due to members who are participants in the Corporation’s deferred and long-term incentive compensation programs, liability for unrecognized tax liabilities and contribution and benefit payments expected to be made pursuant to the Corporation’s post-retirement benefit plans. It should be noted the obligations related to post-retirement benefit plans are not contractual and the plans could be amended at the discretion of the Corporation. The disclosure of contributions and benefit payments has been limited to 10 years, as information beyond this time period was not available. Litigation and Uncertainties The Corporation is involved in various kinds of disputes and legal proceedings that have arisen in the ordinary course of business, including pending litigation, environmental remediation, taxes and other claims. It is the Corporation’s opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, that additional liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition, cash flows or on the Corporation’s quarterly or annual operating results when resolved in a future period. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The Corporation does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Corporation's financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates General Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon the Consolidated Financial Statements, prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate be made based on assumptions about matters uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact the financial statements. Management -29- Table of Contents believes the following critical accounting policies reflect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Fiscal year-end – The Corporation follows a 52/53-week fiscal year which ends on the Saturday nearest December 31. Fiscal year 2013 ended on December 28, 2013; 2012 ended on December 29, 2012; and 2011 ended on December 31, 2011. The financial statements for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 are all on a 52-week basis. A 53-week year occurs approximately every sixth year. Revenue recognition – Sales of office furniture and hearth products are generally recognized when title transfers and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to customers. Typically title and risk of ownership transfer when the product is shipped. In certain circumstances, title and risk of ownership do not transfer until the goods are received by the customer or upon installation or customer acceptance. Revenue includes freight charged to customers; related costs are included in selling and administrative expense. Rebates, discounts and other marketing program expenses directly related to the sale are recorded as a reduction to sales. Marketing program accruals require the use of management estimates and the consideration of contractual arrangements subject to interpretation. Customer sales that achieve or do not achieve certain award levels can affect the amount of such estimates, and actual results could differ from these estimates. Future market conditions may require increased incentive offerings, possibly resulting in an incremental reduction in net sales at the time the incentive is offered. Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable – The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is based on several factors, including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience, the length of time a receivable has been outstanding and specific account analysis that projects the ultimate collectability of the account. As such, these factors may change over time causing the Corporation to adjust the reserve level accordingly. When the Corporation determines a customer is unlikely to pay, a charge is recorded to bad debt expense in the income statement and the allowance for doubtful accounts is increased. When the Corporation is reasonably certain the customer cannot pay, the receivable is written off by removing the accounts receivable amount and reducing the allowance for doubtful accounts accordingly. As of December 28, 2013, there was approximately $235 million in outstanding accounts receivable and $6 million recorded in the allowance for doubtful accounts to cover potential future customer non-payments. However, if economic conditions were to deteriorate significantly or one of the Corporation’s large customers declares bankruptcy, a larger allowance for doubtful accounts might be necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts was approximately $5 million at year-end 2012 and $5 million at year- end 2011. Inventory valuation – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is principally determined using the last-in, first- out ("LIFO") method. The value of inventories on the LIFO basis represented about 74%, 70% and 67% of total inventories at December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. If the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method had been in use, inventories would have been $27.7 million, $25.5 million and $25.9 million higher than reported at December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Long-lived assets - The Corporation reviews long-lived assets for impairment as events or changes in circumstances occur indicating the amount of the asset reflected in the Corporation’s balance sheet may not be recoverable. The Corporation compares an estimate of undiscounted cash flows produced by the asset, or the appropriate group of assets, to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. The estimates of future cash flows involve considerable management judgment and are based upon the Corporation’s assumptions about future operating performance. The actual cash flows could differ from management’s estimates due to changes in business conditions, operating performance and economic conditions. Asset impairment charges associated with the Corporation’s restructuring activities are discussed in Restructuring Related and Impairment Charges in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Corporation’s continuous focus on improving the manufacturing process tends to increase the likelihood of assets being replaced; therefore, the Corporation is regularly evaluating the expected useful lives of its equipment which can result in accelerated depreciation. Goodwill and other intangibles – The Corporation evaluates its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indicators of impairment exist. The Corporation had nine reporting units within its office furniture and hearth products operating segments, which contained goodwill during the fourth quarter analysis. These reporting units constitute components for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by segment management. The accounting standards for goodwill permit entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test. The Corporation utilized this guidance for the annual impairment evaluation for three reporting units during the -30- Table of Contents fourth quarter of 2013 where the fair value was substantially in excess of carrying value in prior year analysis. The Corporation determined that based on relevant qualitative factors that it was more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting units were greater than their carrying amount. Therefore, no further testing was performed on these reporting units. The qualitative factors considered included, but were not limited to, general economic conditions, outlook for the office furniture and hearth products industries and recent and forecasted financial performance of these reporting units. General economic conditions considered included GDP, CEO confidence, small business confidence, corporate profitability, office vacancy rates, commodity prices, housing starts and remodel activity. The Corporation performed a two-step goodwill impairment test for all other reporting units. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The estimate of fair value of each reporting unit is based on management’s projection of revenues, gross margin, operating costs and cash flows considering historical and estimated future results, general economic and market conditions as well as the impact of planned business and operational strategies. The valuations employ present value techniques to measure fair value and consider market factors. Management believes the assumptions used for the impairment test are consistent with those utilized by a market participant in performing similar valuations of its reporting units. Management bases its fair value estimates on assumptions they believe to be reasonable at the time, but such assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainty. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In addition, for reasonableness, the Corporation also computed the fair value of all but one of the reporting units using EBIT multiples of market competitors, noting the fair value as determined by the discounted cash flow analysis was consistent with these estimates. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an additional step is required to determine the implied fair value of goodwill associated with that reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by first allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities and then computing the excess of the reporting unit’s fair value over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, such excess represents the amount of goodwill impairment and, accordingly, such impairment is recognized. As a result of the review performed in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Corporation determined the fair value of its nine reporting units all exceeded the respective carrying value and, therefore, no impairment of goodwill was recorded. Under the income approach, the Corporation assumed a forecasted cash flow period of ten to fifteen years with discount rates ranging from 10 percent to 13 percent, near term growth rates ranging from negative 15.4 percent to positive 17.5 percent and terminal growth rates ranging from 3 percent to 5 percent. For all reporting units included in the two-step impairment test except two, the estimated fair value is significantly in excess of carrying value. These other two reporting units were recently acquired and therefore have a carrying value that is closer to the current fair value. The two reporting units within the office furniture segment, exceeded their carrying value by approximately 7 percent and 6 percent. These reporting units have goodwill of approximately $12 million and $14 million, respectively. For the office furniture reporting unit that exceeded its carrying value by approximately 7 percent, the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 10.5 percent, near term growth rates ranging from 0.8 percent to 10.4 percent and a terminal growth rate of 3 percent. The fair value model assumes continued positive economic momentum and transformation of the reporting unit including sales and marketing initiatives, new product development, operational processes and structural costs. Holding other assumptions constant a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in a $7 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and a 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate would result in a $4 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Both of these scenarios individually would result in the reporting unit failing step 1. For the office furniture reporting unit that exceeded its carrying value by approximately 6 percent, the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 13 percent, near term growth rates ranging from negative 15.4 percent to positive 17.5 percent and a terminal growth rate of 5 percent. The fair value model assumes positive economic momentum and transformation of the reporting unit including sales and marketing initiatives, new product development, operational processes and structural costs. The Corporation did not use the market approach for this reporting unit due to it being in a developing market so market multiples are not as meaningful as well as the lack of comparable companies. Holding other assumptions constant, a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in a $5 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and a 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate would result in a $2 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Both of these scenarios individually would result in the reporting unit failing step 1. Assessing the fair value of goodwill includes, among other things, making key assumptions for estimating future cash flows and appropriate market multiples. These assumptions are subject to a high degree of judgment and complexity. The Corporation makes every effort to estimate future cash flows as accurately as possible with the information available at the time the forecast is developed. However, changes in assumptions and estimates may affect the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, and could -31- Table of Contents result in an impairment charge in future periods. Factors that have the potential to create variances in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit include but are not limited to economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries where the Corporation has a presence, competitor behavior, the mix of product sales, commodity costs, wage rates, the level of manufacturing capacity, the pricing environment and currency exchange fluctuations. In addition, estimates of fair value are impacted by estimates of the market-participant derived weighted average cost of capital. Additionally, the Corporation's compared the estimated aggregate fair value of its reporting units to its overall market capitalization. Goodwill of approximately $287 million remains on the consolidated balance sheet as of the end of fiscal 2013. The Corporation also determines the fair value of indefinite-lived trade names on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indication of impairment exists. The Corporation performed its fiscal 2013 assessment of indefinite lived trade names during the fourth quarter. The estimate of the fair value of the trade names was based on a discounted cash flow model using inputs which included: projected revenues from management’s long-term plan, assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the trade names were not owned and a discount rate. As a result of the review performed in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Corporation determined the fair value of all trade names exceeded the respective carrying value and, therefore no impairment was recorded. A carrying value of all indefinite-lived trade names of approximately $41 million remains on the consolidated balance sheet at the end of fiscal 2013. For all trade names except one, the estimated fair value is significantly in excess of carrying value. The one trade name within the office furniture segment, exceeded its carrying value by approximately 5 percent and had a carrying value of $7.6 million. For this trade name the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 12 percent, terminal growth rate of 3 percent and a royalty rate of 2.5 percent. A 100 basis point change in any of these assumptions could trigger an impairment. The Corporation has definite-lived intangibles that are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible, subject to amortization, is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Intangibles, net of amortization, of approximately $95 million are included on the consolidated balance sheet as of the end of fiscal 2013. Key to recoverability of goodwill, indefinite-lived intangibles and long-lived assets is the forecast of the speed and magnitude of the economic recovery and its impact on future revenues, operating margins and cash flows. Management’s projection for the U.S. office furniture and domestic hearth markets and global economic conditions is inherently subject to a number of uncertain factors, such as global economic improvement, the U.S housing market, credit availability and borrowing rates, and overall consumer confidence. In the near term, as management monitors the above factors, it is possible it may change the revenue and cash flow projections of certain reporting units, which may require the recording of additional asset impairment charges. Self-insured reserves – The Corporation is primarily self-insured or carries high deductibles for general, auto, and product liability; workers’ compensation; and certain employee health benefits. The general, auto, product, and workers’ compensation liabilities are managed via a wholly-owned insurance captive; the related liabilities are included in the accompanying financial statements. As of December 28, 2013, those liabilities totaled $28 million. The Corporation’s policy is to accrue amounts in accordance with the actuarially determined liabilities. The actuarial valuations are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Changes in assumptions for such matters as the number or severity of claims, medical cost inflation, and magnitude of change in actual experience development could cause these estimates to change in the near term. Stock-based compensation – The Corporation measures the cost of employee services in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognizes cost over the requisite service period. This resulted in a cost of approximately $7.5 million in 2013, $6.4 million in 2012 and $7.2 million in 2011. Income taxes – Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. The Corporation provides for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United States, except for those earnings that it considers to be permanently reinvested. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance updating the presentation format of comprehensive income. The guidance provided two options for presenting net income and other comprehensive income. The total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income may be presented in either a single continuous -32- Table of Contents statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Corporation adopted the new guidance beginning January 1, 2012. The guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporation's financial statements. In July 2012, the FASB issued accounting guidance intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill by providing the option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether future impairment testing is necessary. The Corporation adopted the new guidance beginning December 30, 2012, the beginning of the Corporation's 2013 fiscal year. The guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporation's financial statements. In January 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance clarifying the scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Corporation does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its fiscal 2014 financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance intended to improve the reporting classifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income of various components. This guidance was effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2012. The Corporation adopted the new guidance beginning December 30, 2012, the beginning of the Corporation's 2013 fiscal year. In July 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, or similar tax loss, or a tax carryforward exists. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Corporation does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its fiscal 2014 financial statements. Looking Ahead Management remains optimistic about the office furniture and hearth markets and the Corporation's long-term prospects. The Corporation remains focused on creating long-term shareholder value by growing its business through investment in building brands, product solutions and selling models, enhancing its strong member-owner culture and remaining focused on its long- standing rapid continuous improvement programs to build best total cost and a lean enterprise. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK During the normal course of business, the Corporation is subjected to market risk associated with interest rate movements. Interest rate risk arises from our variable interest debt obligations. For information related to the Corporation’s long-term debt, refer to the Long-Term Debt disclosure in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report. The Corporation does not currently have any interest rate swap agreements in place. The Corporation does not currently have any significant foreign currency exposure. The Corporation began using derivative instruments to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges, and not to speculate on the future price of diesel fuel, in April of 2010. The hedging instruments consist of a series of financially settled fixed forward contracts with expiration dates ranging up to twelve months. At December 28, 2013, the effect on the consolidated balance sheet was insignificant. The effect on the consolidated statement of income for the year ended December 28, 2013 was a reduction in operating expense of $0.2 million. The Corporation is exposed to risks arising from price changes for certain direct materials and assembly components used in its operations. The most significant material purchases and cost for the Corporation are for steel, plastics, textiles, wood particleboard and cartoning. Steel, aluminum and wood/wood related products are the most significant raw material used in the manufacturing of products. The market price of plastics and textiles in particular are sensitive to the cost of oil and natural gas. The cost of wood particleboard has been impacted by continued downsizing of production capacity as well as increased volatility in input and transportation costs. All of these materials are impacted increasingly by global market pressure. The Corporation works to offset these increased costs through global sourcing initiatives, product re-engineering and price increases on its products; however, historically, margins have been negatively impacted due to the lag between cost increases and the Corporation’s ability to increase its prices. The Corporation believes future market price increases on its key direct materials and assembly components are likely. Consequently, it views the prospect of such increases as an outlook risk to the business. -33- Table of Contents ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA The financial statements listed under Item 15(a)(1) and (2) are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference. The Summary of Unaudited Quarterly Results of Operations follows the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the Exchange Act. As of December 28, 2013, and, based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded these controls and procedures are effective. There have not been any changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 28, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the attestation report of the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm are included in Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules of this report under the headings “Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” respectively and management's annual report is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. -34- Table of Contents PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The information under the caption "Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors" of the Corporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to executive officers of the Corporation, see Table I - Executive Officers of the Registrant included in Part I of this report. Information relating to the identification of the audit committee and audit committee financial expert of the Corporation is contained under the caption “Information Regarding the Board” of the Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, and is incorporated herein by reference. Code of Ethics The information under the caption “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” of the Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act The information under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" of the Corporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” of the Corporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information under the captions “Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” of the Corporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information under the captions “Information Regarding the Board” and “Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons” of the Corporation's Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information under the caption “Fees Incurred for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” of the Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 6, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. -35- Table of Contents ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a)(1) Financial Statements PART IV The following consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and its subsidiaries included in the Corporation's 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders are filed as a part of this Report pursuant to Item 8: Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 Consolidated Balance Sheets – December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Investor Information (2) Financial Statement Schedules The following consolidated financial statement schedule of the Corporation and its subsidiaries is attached: Page 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 74 Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 75 All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted. (b) Exhibits An exhibit index of all exhibits incorporated by reference into, or filed with, this Report appears on Page 75. The following exhibits are filed herewith: Exhibit (21) (23) (31.1) (31.2) (32.1) 101 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Certification of the CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The following materials from HNI Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(a) (a) Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. -36- Table of Contents SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. HNI Corporation Date: February 21, 2014 By: /s/ Stan A. Askren Stan A. Askren Chairman, President and CEO Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Each Director whose signature appears below authorizes and appoints Stan A. Askren as his or her attorney-in-fact to sign and file on his or her behalf any and all amendments and post- effective amendments to this report. Signature Title Date /s/ Stan A. Askren Stan A. Askren /s/ Kurt A. Tjaden Kurt A. Tjaden /s/ Mary H. Bell Mary H. Bell /s/ Miguel M. Calado Miguel M. Calado /s/ Cheryl A. Francis Cheryl A. Francis /s/ James R. Jenkins James R. Jenkins /s/ Dennis J. Martin Dennis J. Martin /s/ Larry B. Porcellato Larry B. Porcellato Chairman, President and CEO, Principal Executive Officer, and Director Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer Director Director Director Director Director Director -37- February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 Table of Contents Signature Title Date /s/ Abbie J. Smith Abbie J. Smith /s/ Brian E. Stern Brian E. Stern /s/ Ronald V. Waters, III Ronald V. Waters, III Director Director February 21, 2014 February 21, 2014 Lead Director February 21, 2014 -38- Table of Contents Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management of HNI Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. HNI Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. HNI Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those written policies and procedures that: • • • pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of HNI Corporation; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of HNI Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of HNI Corporation; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Internal control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring (including internal auditing practices), and actions taken to correct deficiencies as identified. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of HNI Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013. Management based this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of HNI Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of operational effectiveness of HNI Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Based on this assessment, management determined, as of December 28, 2013, HNI Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. The effectiveness of HNI Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report which appears herein. February 21, 2014 -39- Table of Contents Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of HNI Corporation: In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1), present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of HNI Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) at December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 15. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and on the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chicago, Illinois February 21, 2014 -40- Table of Contents HNI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Amounts in thousands, except for per share data) For the Years Net sales Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related and impairment charges Operating income Interest income Interest expense Income before income taxes Income taxes Net income Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest Net income attributable to HNI Corporation Net income attributable to HNI Corporation per common share – basic Weighted average shares outstanding – basic Net income attributable to HNI Corporation per common share – diluted Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted Foreign currency translation adjustments Change in unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities (net of tax) Change in pension and postretirement liabilty (net of tax) Change in derivative financial instruments (net of tax) Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax Comprehensive income Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest Comprehensive income attributable to HNI Corporation 2013 2012 2011 $ 2,059,964 $ 2,004,003 $ 1,833,450 1,344,672 1,314,776 1,194,387 715,292 608,972 333 105,987 626 9,906 96,707 33,338 63,369 (314) 63,683 1.41 $ $ 689,227 599,656 1,944 87,627 842 10,865 77,604 29,278 48,326 (641) 48,967 1.08 $ $ 639,063 554,315 3,261 81,487 623 11,951 70,159 24,411 45,748 (238) 45,986 1.03 45,250,665 45,211,385 44,803,248 1.39 $ 1.07 $ 1.01 45,956,280 45,819,979 45,694,278 (2,562) $ 264 $ 796 (124) 2,151 187 (348) $ 63,021 (314) 63,335 $ 62 (708) (20) (402) $ 47,924 (641) 48,565 $ 191 (1,270) 339 56 45,804 (238) 46,042 $ $ $ $ $ $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. -41- Table of Contents HNI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Amounts in thousands of dollars and shares except par value) As of Year-end Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Receivables, net Inventories, net Deferred income taxes Prepaid expenses and other current assets Total Current Assets Property, Plant, and Equipment Goodwill Other Assets Total Assets Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Current Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued expenses Note payable and current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations Current maturities of other long-term obligations Total Current Liabilities Long-Term Debt Capital Lease Obligations Other Long-Term Liabilities Deferred Income Taxes Commitments and Contingencies Shareholders’ Equity Preferred stock - $1 par value Authorized: 2,000 Issued: None Common stock - $1 par value Authorized: 200,000 Issued and outstanding: 2013-44,982; 2012-44,951; 2011-44,855 Additional paid-in capital Retained Earnings Accumulated other comprehensive income Total HNI Corporation shareholders’ equity Noncontrolling interest Total Equity Total Liabilities and Equity 2013 2012 2011 65,030 7,251 228,715 89,516 16,051 26,665 433,228 267,401 286,655 147,421 1,134,705 $ $ 41,782 7,250 213,490 93,515 19,412 26,926 402,375 240,490 288,348 145,853 1,077,066 $ $ 72,812 9,157 204,036 101,873 16,261 27,365 431,504 229,727 270,761 119,730 1,051,722 407,799 $ 384,244 $ 351,650 484 3,301 411,584 150,091 106 67,543 68,964 4,554 373 389,171 150,146 226 63,995 52,868 30,345 275 382,270 150,200 340 59,356 40,234 — — — 44,982 44,951 44,855 16,729 373,652 965 436,328 89 436,417 1,134,705 $ 20,153 353,942 1,313 420,359 301 420,660 1,077,066 $ 24,277 348,210 1,715 419,057 265 419,322 1,051,722 $ $ $ $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. -42- Table of Contents HNI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY Parent Company Shareholders’ Equity Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss)/Income Non- controlling Interest Total Shareholders’ Equity $ 44,841 $ 18,011 $ 343,474 $ 1,659 $ 471 $ 408,456 45,986 (238) 45,748 (Amounts in thousands) Balance, January 1, 2011 Comprehensive income: Net income Other comprehensive income (net of tax) Distributions to noncontrolling interest Change in ownership of noncontrolling interest Cash dividends; $0.92 per share Common shares – treasury: 56 (87) 119 (41,250) 56 (87) 119 (41,250) (10,000) 16,280 Shares purchased Shares issued under Members’ Stock Purchase Plan and stock awards (324) (9,676) 338 15,942 Balance, December 31, 2011 $ 44,855 $ 24,277 $ 348,210 $ 1,715 $ 265 $ 419,322 Comprehensive income: Net income (loss) Other comprehensive (loss) (net of tax) Distributions to noncontrolling interest Change in ownership of noncontrolling interest Cash dividends; $0.95 per share Common shares – treasury: Shares purchased (800) (20,221) Shares issued under Members’ Stock Purchase Plan and stock awards 896 16,097 48,967 (641) 48,326 (402) (124) 801 (194) (43,041) (402) (124) 607 (43,041) (21,021) 16,993 Balance, December 29, 2012 $ 44,951 $ 20,153 $ 353,942 $ 1,313 $ 301 $ 420,660 Comprehensive income: Net income (loss) Other comprehensive (loss) (net of tax) Distributions to noncontrolling interest Change in ownership of noncontrolling interest Cash dividends; $0.96 per share Common shares – treasury: 63,683 (314) 63,369 (348) (167) 269 (479) (43,494) (348) (167) (210) (43,494) (27,488) 24,095 436,417 Shares purchased (740) (26,748) Shares issued under Members’ Stock Purchase Plan and stock awards Balance, December 28, 2013 771 44,982 $ 23,324 16,729 $ $ 373,652 $ 965 $ 89 $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. -43- 2013 2012 2011 $ 63,369 $ 48,326 $ 45,748 Table of Contents HNI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Amounts in thousands) For the Years Net Cash Flows From (To) Operating Activities: Net income Noncash items included in net income: Depreciation and amortization Other postretirement and post-employment benefits Stock-based compensation Excess tax benefits from stock compensation Deferred income taxes Net loss on sales, retirements and impairments of long-lived assets and intangibles Loss on sale of business Stock issued to retirement plan Other – net Changes in working capital, excluding acquisition and disposition: Receivables Inventories Prepaid expenses and other current assets Accounts payable and accrued expenses Income taxes Increase (decrease) in other liabilities Net cash flows from (to) operating activities Net Cash Flows From (To) Investing Activities: Capital expenditures Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment Capitalized software Acquisition spending, net of cash acquired Purchase of investments Sales or maturities of investments Other – net Net cash flows from (to) investing activities 46,621 1,309 7,451 (2,211) 18,451 344 2,177 5,352 4,419 (21,029) 1,606 526 25,863 4,525 6,229 165,002 (60,977) 421 (17,918) — (1,107) 5,053 (891) (75,419) 43,360 1,678 6,437 (4,156) 7,060 1,032 — 4,864 2,557 (6,993) 9,546 (1,799) 27,531 4,662 672 144,777 (39,473) 1,182 (20,797) (26,894) (5,554) 4,762 961 (85,813) Net Cash Flows From (To) Financing Activities: Purchase of HNI Corporation common stock Withholding related to net share settlements of equity based awards Proceeds from note and long-term debt Payments of note and long-term debt and other financing Proceeds from sale of HNI Corporation common stock Excess tax benefits from stock compensation Dividends paid Net cash flows from (to) financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ (27,488) (1,598) 157,967 (163,524) 9,591 2,211 (43,494) (66,335) 23,248 41,782 65,030 $ (21,021) (5,995) 148,844 (179,333) 6,396 4,156 (43,041) (89,994) (31,030) 72,812 41,782 $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. -44- 46,287 1,660 7,171 (99) 12,400 273 — 4,906 849 (6,924) (11,279) (4,352) 39,866 (4,444) 2,216 134,278 (27,795) 3,255 (3,348) (54,990) (15,555) 6,480 412 (91,541) (10,000) — 5,455 (26,523) 3,198 99 (41,250) (69,021) (26,284) 99,096 72,812 Table of Contents HNI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Nature of Operations HNI Corporation with its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) is a provider of office furniture and hearth products. Both industries are reportable segments; however, the Corporation’s office furniture business is its principal line of business. Refer to Operating Segment Information for further information. Office furniture products are sold through a national system of dealers, wholesalers and national office product distributors and directly to end-user customers and federal, state and local governments. Dealers and wholesalers are the major channels based on sales. Hearth products include a full array of gas, electric, and wood burning fireplaces, inserts, stoves, facings and accessories. These products are sold through a national system of dealers and distributors, as well as Corporation-owned distribution and retail outlets. The Corporation’s products are marketed predominantly in the United States and Canada. The Corporation exports select products to a limited number of markets outside North America, principally the Middle East, Mexico, Latin America and the Caribbean, through its export subsidiary and manufactures and markets office furniture in Asia and India; however, based on sales, these activities are not significant. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation and Fiscal Year-End The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Corporation follows a 52/53 week fiscal year which ends on the Saturday nearest December 31. Fiscal year 2013 ended on December 28, 2013; 2012 ended on December 29, 2012; and 2011 ended on December 31, 2011. The financial statements for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 are on a 52-week basis. A 53-week year occurs approximately every sixth year. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments Cash and cash equivalents generally consist of cash and money market accounts. The fair value approximates the carrying value due to the short duration of the securities. These securities have original maturity dates not exceeding three months. The Corporation has short-term investments with maturities of less than one year and also has investments with maturities greater than one year included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Management classifies investments in marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such classification at each balance sheet date. Debt securities including government and corporate bonds are classified as available-for-sale and stated at current market value with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of equity, net of any related tax effect. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on the trade date. At December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, cash, cash equivalents and investments consisted of the following: Year-End 2013 (In thousands) Held-to-maturity securities Certificates of deposit Available-for-sale securities Debt securities Cash and money market accounts Total Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Long-term investments $ $ — $ 251 $ — — 65,030 7,000 — 65,030 $ 7,251 $ 9,113 — 9,113 The amortized cost basis of the debt securities as of December 28, 2013 was $16.0 million. Unrealized gains of $0.2 million and unrealized losses of $0.1 million are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 28, 2013 for these debt securities. -45- Table of Contents Year-End 2012 (In thousands) Held-to-maturity securities Certificates of deposit Available-for-sale securities Debt securities Cash and money market accounts Total Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Long-term investments $ $ — $ 250 $ — — 41,782 7,000 — 13,356 — 41,782 $ 7,250 $ 13,356 The amortized cost basis of the debt securities as of December 29, 2012 was $20.0 million. Unrealized gains of $0.3 million and unrealized losses of $0.0 million are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 29, 2012 for these debt securities. Year-End 2011 (In thousands) Held-to-maturity securities Certificates of deposit Available-for-sale securities Debt securities Cash and money market accounts Total Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Long-term investments $ $ — $ 257 $ — — 72,812 8,900 — 10,714 — 72,812 $ 9,157 $ 10,714 The amortized cost basis of the debt securities as of December 31, 2011 was $19.4 million. Unrealized gains of $0.2 million and unrealized losses of $0.0 million are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2011 for these debt securities. Receivables Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6.2 million, $5.2 million and $4.8 million, for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The allowance is developed based on several factors including overall customer credit quality, historical write-off experience, and specific account analyses projecting the ultimate collectibility of the account. As such, these factors may change over time causing the reserve level to adjust accordingly. Inventories The Corporation valued 74%, 70% and 67% of its inventory by the LIFO method at December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. During 2013 and 2012, inventory quantities were reduced at certain reporting units. This reduction resulted in a liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs prevailing in prior years as compared with the cost of current year purchases, the effect of which decreased cost of goods sold by approximately $0.2 million and $0.8 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively. If the FIFO method had been in use, inventories would have been $27.7 million, $25.5 million and $25.9 million higher than reported at December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Major improvements that materially extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Depreciation has been computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives: land improvements, 10 – 20 years; buildings, 10 – 40 years; and machinery and equipment, 3 – 12 years. Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment as events or changes in circumstances occur indicating the amount of the asset reflected in the Corporation’s balance sheet may not be recoverable. An estimate of undiscounted cash flows produced by the asset, or the appropriate group of assets, is compared to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. The estimates of future cash flows involve considerable management judgment and are based upon assumptions about expected future operating performance. The actual cash flows could differ from management’s estimates due to changes in business conditions, operating performance and economic conditions. Asset impairment charges recorded in connection with the Corporation’s restructuring -46- Table of Contents activities are discussed in Restructuring Related Charges. These assets included real estate, manufacturing equipment and certain other fixed assets. The Corporation’s continuous focus on improving the manufacturing process tends to increase the likelihood of assets being replaced; therefore, the Corporation is regularly evaluating the expected lives of its equipment and accelerating depreciation where appropriate. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The Corporation evaluates its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indicators of impairment exist. The accounting standards for goodwill permit entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test. The Corporation utilized this guidance for three reporting units for the annual impairment evaluation during the fourth quarter of 2013 where the fair value was substantially in excess of carrying value in prior year analysis. The qualitative factors considered included, but were not limited to, general economic conditions, outlook for the office furniture and hearth products industries and recent and forecasted financial performance of these units. General economic conditions considered included GDP, CEO confidence, small business confidence, corporate profitability, office vacancy rates, commodity prices, housing starts and remodeling activity. The Corporation performed the two-step goodwill impairment test for all other reporting units and used various valuation techniques with the primary technique being a discounted cash flow method. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Management bases its fair value estimates on assumptions it believes to be reasonable at the time, but such assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainty. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The Corporation also determines the fair value of indefinite-lived trade names on an annual basis or whenever indications of impairment exist. The Corporation estimates the fair value of the trade names based on a discounted cash flow model using inputs which include projected revenues from management’s long-term plan, assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the trade names were not owned and a discount rate. Determining the fair value of a trade name involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ from those estimates. The Corporation has definite-lived intangibles, including capitalized software, that are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible, subject to amortization, is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Definite-lived intangibles, net of amortization, of approximately $95 million are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of the end of fiscal 2013. See Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets footnote for further information. Product Warranties The Corporation issues certain warranty policies on its furniture and hearth products that provide for repair or replacement of any covered product or component failing during normal use because of a defect in design, materials or workmanship. Reserves have been established for the various costs associated with the Corporation's warranty programs. A warranty reserve is determined by recording a specific reserve for known warranty issues and an additional reserve for unknown claims expected to be incurred based on historical claims experience. Actual claims incurred could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserve. Activity associated with warranty obligations was as follows: (In thousands) Balance at the beginning of the period Accrual assumed from acquisition Accruals for warranties issued during the period Accrual related to pre-existing warranties Settlements made during the period Balance at the end of the period 2013 13,055 — 21,878 106 (21,199) 13,840 $ $ 2012 12,910 301 18,370 432 (18,958) 13,055 $ $ 2011 12,930 222 15,581 (100) (15,723) 12,910 $ $ The Corporation corrected a classification error by reclassifying a portion of the reserve for product warranties which was previously all classified as a current liability, including the related deferred tax impacts, to long-term. The portion of the reserve for estimated settlements expected to be paid in the next twelve months was, $6.7 million, $6.3 million and $6.3 million as of December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and are included in "Accounts payable and accrued expenses" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The portion of the reserve for estimated settlements expected to be paid beyond one year was, $7.1 million, $6.7 million and $6.6 million as of December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, and are included in "Other Long-Term Liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The revisions in the Consolidated Balance -47- Table of Contents Sheet noted above represent errors that are not deemed material, individually or in the aggregate, to the prior period consolidated financial statements. Revenue Recognition Sales of office furniture and hearth products are generally recognized when title transfers and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to customers. Typically title and risk of ownership transfer when the product is shipped. In certain circumstances, title and risk of ownership do not transfer until the goods are received by the customer or upon installation and customer acceptance. Revenue includes freight charged to customers; related costs are recorded in selling and administrative expense. Rebates, discounts and other marketing program expenses directly related to the sale are recorded as a reduction to net sales. Marketing program accruals require the use of management estimates and the consideration of contractual arrangements subject to interpretation. Customer sales that achieve or do not achieve certain award levels can affect the amount of such estimates and actual results could differ from these estimates. Product Development Costs Product development costs relating to development of new products and processes, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products, are expensed as incurred. These costs include salaries, contractor fees, building costs, utilities and administrative fees. The amounts charged against income were $27.3 million in 2013, $26.9 million in 2012 and $23.1 million in 2011 and were recorded in Selling and Administrative Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Freight Expense The Corporation records freight expense to customers in Selling and Administrative Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Amounts recorded were $123.8 million in 2013, $122.1 million in 2012 and $112.3 million in 2011. Stock-Based Compensation The Corporation measures the cost of employee services in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognizes cost over the requisite service period. See the Stock-Based Compensation footnote for further information. Income Taxes The Corporation uses an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income taxes are provided to reflect differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. The Corporation provides for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United States, except for those earnings it considers to be permanently reinvested. There were approximately $26.2 million of accumulated earnings considered permanently reinvested in China, Hong Kong and India as of December 28, 2013. The Corporation believes the U.S. tax cost on unremitted foreign earnings would be approximately $7.9 million if the amounts were not considered permanently reinvested. See the Income Tax footnote for further information. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Shares potentially issuable under stock options, restricted stock units and common stock equivalents under the Corporation's deferred compensation plans have been considered outstanding for purposes of the diluted earnings per share calculation. -48- Table of Contents The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS): (In thousands, except per share data) Numerators: 2013 2012 2011 Numerators for both basic and diluted EPS net income attributable to parent company $ 63,683 $ 48,967 $ 45,986 Denominators: Denominator for basic EPS weighted- average common shares outstanding Potentially dilutive shares from stock option plans Denominator for diluted EPS Earnings per share – basic Earnings per share – diluted 45,251 706 45,956 1.41 1.39 $ $ 45,211 609 45,820 1.08 1.07 $ $ 44,803 891 45,694 1.03 1.01 $ $ Certain exercisable and non-exercisable stock options were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 because inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. The number of stock options outstanding, which met this criterion was 769,394; 1,760,220 and 1,969,085 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The more significant areas requiring use of management estimates relate to allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, marketing program accruals, warranty accruals, accruals for self-insured medical claims, workers’ compensation, legal contingencies, general liability and auto insurance claims, valuation of long-lived assets, and useful lives for depreciation and amortization. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Self-Insurance The Corporation is primarily self-insured for general, auto and product liability, workers’ compensation, and certain employee health benefits. The general, auto, product and workers’ compensation liabilities are managed using a wholly owned insurance captive; the related liabilities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As of December 28, 2013, these liabilities totaled $28.2 million. The Corporation’s policy is to accrue amounts in accordance with the actuarially determined liabilities. The actuarial valuations are based on historical information along with certain assumptions about future events. Changes in assumptions for such matters as legal actions, medical cost inflation and magnitude of change in actual experience development could cause these estimates to change in the future. Foreign Currency Translations Foreign currency financial statements of foreign operations where the local currency is the functional currency are translated using exchange rates in effect at period end for assets and liabilities and average exchange rates during the period for results of operations. Related translation adjustments are reported as a component of Shareholders’ Equity. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are included in the “Selling and administrative expenses” caption of the Consolidated Statements of Income. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made within the footnotes to conform to the current year presentation. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2011, the FASB issued accounting guidance updating the presentation format of comprehensive income. The guidance provided two options for presenting net income and other comprehensive income. The total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income may be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Corporation adopted the new guidance beginning January 1, 2012. The guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporation's financial statements. In July 2012, the FASB issued accounting guidance intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill by providing the option of performing a qualitative assessment to -49- Table of Contents determine whether future impairment testing is necessary. The Corporation adopted the new guidance beginning December 30, 2012, the beginning of the Corporation's 2013 fiscal year. The guidance did not have a material impact on the Corporation's financial statements. In January 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance clarifying the scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Corporation does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its fiscal 2014 financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance intended to improve the reporting classifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income of various components. This guidance was effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2012. The Corporation adopted the new guidance beginning December 30, 2012, the beginning of the Corporation's 2013 fiscal year. In July 2013, the FASB issued accounting guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, or similar tax loss, or a tax carryforward exists. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Corporation does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its fiscal 2014 financial statements. Restructuring Related and Impairment Charges During 2011, the Corporation made the decision to transition out of its Lithia Springs, Georgia office furniture distribution center and the transition was completed in fourth quarter 2012. The distribution center was operated by a third-party logistics provider. The Corporation added distribution capacity to its Cedartown, Georgia office furniture manufacturing facility and distribution center to make up for the loss of the Lithia Springs distribution center. To make room for the additional distribution capacity, the Corporation consolidated some office furniture manufacturing production from the Cedartown facility into existing office furniture manufacturing facilities in Muscatine, Iowa. In addition, during 2011, the Corporation made the decision to consolidate some office furniture manufacturing production from its Hickory, North Carolina facility into its Wayland, New York facility. In connection with the closure, consolidations and realignment, the Corporation recorded $0.2 million of accelerated depreciation of machinery and equipment recorded in cost of sales and $1.8 million of severance and facility exit costs recorded as restructuring costs in 2011. During 2012, the Corporation recorded current period charges which included $0.3 million of accelerated depreciation of machinery and equipment recorded in cost of sales and $1.5 million of severance and facility exit costs recorded as restructuring costs. These included impairment of leasehold improvements of $0.2 million which was a non-cash transaction. The Corporation made the decision to close certain hearth products retail and distribution locations during the first quarter of 2011. A pre-tax charge of $0.4 million was recorded for severance and facility exit costs. During 2010, the Corporation made the decision to close an office furniture facility in Salisbury, North Carolina and consolidate production into existing office furniture manufacturing facilities. During 2011, the Corporation incurred $0.6 million of current period charges recorded as restructuring costs. During 2010, the Corporation completed the shutdown of an office furniture facility in South Gate, California and consolidated production into existing office furniture manufacturing facilities. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, the Corporation incurred $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million of current period charges due to ongoing costs related to a vacant building recorded as restructuring costs, respectively. -50- Table of Contents The following table summarizes the restructuring accrual activity since the beginning of fiscal 2011. (In thousands) Restructuring reserve at January 1, 2011 Restructuring charges Cash payments Restructuring reserve at December 31, 2011 Restructuring charges Cash payments Restructuring reserve At December 29, 2012 Restructuring charges Cash Payments Restructuring reserve At December 28, 2013 Severance Costs Facility Termination & Other Costs Total $ $ $ $ 2,389 $ 243 $ 636 (1,957) 1,068 (316) (560) 192 (8) (135) 49 $ $ $ 2,625 (2,837) 31 2,107 (2,120) 18 341 (353) 6 $ $ $ 2,632 3,261 (4,794) 1,099 1,791 (2,680) 210 333 (488) 55 Business Combinations The Corporation completed the acquisition of 97.8% of the capital stock of BP Ergo Limited, a leading manufacturer and marketer of office furniture in India, on August 13, 2012 for a purchase price of approximately $25.5 million and assumption of $4.1 million of short-term bank debt. BP Ergo goes to market through a national network of sales branches and dealers supported by two manufacturing locations. The determination of fair value for the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires use of estimates and judgments. There were approximately $9.8 million of intangibles other than goodwill associated with this acquisition with estimated useful lives of ten years with amortization recorded based on the projected cash flow associated with the respective intangible assets' existing relationship. There was approximately $15.9 million of goodwill associated with this acquisition assigned to the office furniture segment. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. As of December 28, 2013 the Corporation owns 99.3% of the capital stock of BP Ergo. The Corporation completed the acquisition of the pellet stove business of Dansons, Inc. on August 29, 2012 for a purchase price of approximately $1.5 million. There were approximately $1.4 million of intangible assets other than goodwill associated with this acquisition with estimated useful lives of eight years with amortization recorded based on the projected cash flow associated with the respective intangible assets’ existing relationship. The Corporation completed the acquisition of Sagus International, Inc, a privately held designer and manufacturer of educational furniture on November 14, 2011 for a purchase price of approximately $56.1 million in an all cash transaction. Sagus operates primarily in North America. The Corporation finalized the allocation of the purchase price during the first quarter of 2012. There were approximately $14.9 million of intangible assets other than goodwill associated with this acquisition with estimated useful lives ranging from eight to ten years with amortization recorded based on the projected cash flow associated with the respective intangible assets’ existing relationship. There was approximately $11.8 million of goodwill associated with this acquisition assigned to the office furniture segment. The goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes. The results of the acquired businesses have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since the date of acquisition and represent 5% of consolidated net sales for 2013 and therefore, no proforma presentation has been provided. Supplemental Cash Flow Information The Corporation had certain non-cash operating and investing activities related to accrued purchases of property and equipment of $3.8 million and capitalized software of $1.1 million at December 28, 2013. In subsequent periods, revision will be made on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows that will decrease the operating cash flows related to the change in accounts payable and accrued expenses for the three months ended March 30, 2013, the six months ended June 29, 2013 and nine months ended September 28, 2013 of $1.3 million, $5.7 million and $4.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 30, 2013 investing cash flows on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows will increase $1.6 million related to capital expenditures of property and equipment and decrease $0.3 million related to expenditures of capitalized software. For the six months ended June 29, 2013 and the nine months ended September 28, 2013 investing cash flows on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows will increase $4.4 million and $4.0 million related to capital expenditures for property and equipment, respectively and $1.3 million and $0.5 million related to capital expenditures for capitalized software, respectively. The -51- revisions in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows noted above represent errors that are not deemed material, individually or in the aggregate, to the prior period consolidated financial statements. Cash payments for interest and income taxes consisted of the following: (In thousands) Interest paid (net of capitalized interest) Income taxes paid Inventories (In thousands) Finished products Materials and work in process LIFO reserve Property, Plant, and Equipment (In thousands) Land and land improvements Buildings Machinery and equipment Construction and equipment installation in progress Less: accumulated depreciation $ $ $ $ $ 2013 2012 2011 9,909 9,576 $ $ 10,865 13,404 $ $ 11,968 14,099 2013 2012 51,991 $ 47,042 $ 65,247 (27,722) 89,516 $ 71,945 (25,472) 93,515 $ 2013 2012 27,465 $ 26,681 $ 284,484 470,748 24,209 806,906 539,505 268,003 465,014 17,871 777,569 537,079 $ 267,401 $ 240,490 $ 2011 65,136 62,638 (25,901) 101,873 2011 23,197 264,081 468,926 11,911 768,115 538,388 229,727 Total depreciation expense was $36.3 million, $34.1 million and $38.6 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets The Corporation evaluates its goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indicators of impairment exist. The Corporation had nine reporting units within its office furniture and hearth products operating segments, which contained goodwill during the fourth quarter analysis. These reporting units constitute components for which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by segment management. The accounting standards for goodwill permit entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test. The Corporation utilized this guidance for the annual impairment evaluation for three reporting units during the fourth quarter of 2013 where the fair value was substantially in excess of carrying value in prior year analysis. The Corporation determined that based on relevant qualitative factors that it was more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting units were greater than their carrying amount. Therefore, no further testing was performed on these reporting units. The qualitative factors considered included, but were not limited to, general economic conditions, outlook for the office furniture and hearth product industries and recent and forecasted financial performance of these units. General economic conditions considered included GDP, CEO confidence, small business confidence, corporate profitability, office vacancy rates, commodity prices, housing starts and remodel activity. The Corporation performed a two-step goodwill impairment test for all other reporting units. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. The estimate of fair value of each reporting unit is based on management’s projection of revenues, gross margin, operating costs and cash flows considering historical and estimated future results, general economic and market conditions as well as the impact of planned business and operational strategies. The valuations employ present value techniques to measure fair value and consider market factors. Management believes the assumptions used for the impairment test are consistent with those utilized by a market participant in performing similar valuations of its reporting units. Management bases its fair value estimates on assumptions they believe to be reasonable at the time, but such assumptions are subject to inherent uncertainty. Actual results may differ from those estimates. In addition, for reasonableness, the Corporation also computed the fair value of all but one of the reporting units using EBIT multiples of market competitors, noting the fair value as determined by the discounted cash flow analysis was consistent with these estimates. Table of Contents If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an additional step is required to determine the implied fair value of goodwill associated with that reporting unit. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by first allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities and then computing the excess of the reporting unit’s fair value over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, such excess represents the amount of goodwill impairment and, accordingly, such impairment is recognized. As a result of the review performed in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Corporation determined the fair value of its nine reporting units all exceeded the respective carrying value and, therefore, no impairment of goodwill was recorded. Under the income approach, the Corporation assumed a forecasted cash flow period of ten to fifteen years with discount rates ranging from 10 percent to 13 percent, near term growth rates ranging from negative 15.4 percent to positive 17.5 percent and terminal growth rates ranging from 3 percent to 5 percent. For all reporting units included in the two-step impairment test except two, the estimated fair value is significantly in excess of carrying value. The other two reporting units were recently acquired and therefore have a carrying value that is closer to the current fair value. These two reporting units within the office furniture segment, exceeded their carrying value by approximately 7 percent and 6 percent. These reporting units have goodwill of approximately $12 million and $14 million, respectively. For the office furniture reporting unit that exceeded its carrying value by approximately 7 percent, the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 10.5 percent, near term growth rates ranging from 0.8 percent to 10.4 percent and a terminal growth rate of 3 percent. The fair value model assumes continued positive economic momentum and transformation of the reporting unit including sales and marketing initiatives, new product development, operational processes and structural costs. Holding other assumptions constant a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in a $7 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and a 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate would result in a $4 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Both of these scenarios individually would result in the reporting unit failing step 1. For the office furniture reporting unit that exceeded its carrying value by approximately 6 percent, the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 13 percent, near term growth rates ranging from negative 15.4 percent to positive 17.5 percent and a terminal growth rate of 5 percent. The fair value model assumes positive economic momentum and transformation of the reporting unit including sales and marketing initiatives, new product development, operational processes and structural costs. The Corporation did not use the market approach for this reporting unit due to it being in a developing market so market multiples are not as meaningful as well as the lack of comparable companies. Holding other assumptions constant, a 100 basis point increase in the discount rate would result in a $5 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and a 100 basis point decrease in the long-term growth rate would result in a $2 million decrease in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. Both of these scenarios individually would result in the reporting unit failing step 1. Assessing the fair value of goodwill includes, among other things, making key assumptions for estimating future cash flows and appropriate market multiples. These assumptions are subject to a high degree of judgment and complexity. The Corporation makes every effort to estimate future cash flows as accurately as possible with the information available at the time the forecast is developed. However, changes in assumptions and estimates may affect the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, and could result in an impairment charge in future periods. Factors that have the potential to create variances in the estimated fair value of the reporting unit include but are not limited to economic conditions in the U.S. and other countries where the Corporation has a presence, competitor behavior, the mix of product sales, commodity costs, wage rates, the level of manufacturing capacity, the pricing environment and currency exchange fluctuations. In addition, estimates of fair value are impacted by estimates of the market-participant derived weighted average cost of capital. Additionally, the Corporation compared the aggregate fair value of its reporting units to its overall market capitalization. The Corporation also owns trade names having a net value of $41 million as of December 28, 2013, $41 million as of December 29, 2012, and $41 million as of December 31, 2011. The trade names are deemed to have an indefinite useful life because they are expected to generate cash flow indefinitely. The Corporation determines the fair value of indefinite-lived trade names on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever indication of impairment exists. The Corporation performed its fiscal 2013 assessment of indefinite lived trade names during the fourth quarter. The estimate of the fair value of the trade names was based on a discounted cash flow model using inputs which included: projected revenues from management’s long-term plan, assumed royalty rates that could be payable if the trade names were not owned and a discount rate. As a result of the review performed in the fourth quarter of 2013, the Corporation determined the fair value of all trade names exceeded the respective carrying value and, therefore no impairment was recorded. -53- Table of Contents For all trade names except one, the estimated fair value is significantly in excess of carrying value. The one trade name within the office furniture segment, exceeded its carrying value by approximately 5 percent and had a carrying value of $7.6 million. For this trade name the Corporation assumed a discount rate of 12 percent, terminal growth rate of 3 percent and a royalty rate of 2.5 percent. A 100 basis point change in any of these assumptions could trigger an impairment. The table below summarizes amortizable definite-lived intangible assets, which are reflected in Other Assets in the Corporation’s Consolidated Balance Sheets: (In thousands) Patents Less: accumulated amortization Net patents Software Less: accumulated amortization Net software Customer lists and other Less: accumulated amortization Net customer lists and other Net intangible assets 2013 18,905 18,685 220 52,778 14,380 38,398 110,609 54,592 56,017 94,635 $ $ 2012 18,905 18,609 296 36,126 13,839 22,287 113,811 49,520 64,291 86,874 $ $ 2011 18,905 18,526 379 15,525 12,014 3,511 102,825 42,688 60,137 64,027 $ $ Amortization expense for capitalized software for 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $2.9 million, $1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense for all other definite-lived intangibles for 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $7.4 million, $7.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively. All amortization expense was recorded in Selling and Administrative Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Based on the current amount of intangible assets subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for each of the following five fiscal years is as follows: (in millions) Amortization expense 2014 2015 2016 2017 $ 9.6 $ 11.2 $ 10.5 $ 9.9 $ 2018 9.8 The occurrence of events such as acquisitions, dispositions or impairments in the future may result in changes to amounts. -54- Table of Contents The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill since January 1, 2011, are as follows by reporting segment: (In thousands) Balance as of January 1, 2011 Goodwill Accumulated impairment losses Goodwill acquired during the year Impairment losses Goodwill related to the sale of business units Final purchase price allocations/contingent payments from prior year acquisitions Balance as of December 31, 2011 Goodwill Accumulated impairment losses Goodwill acquired during the year Impairment losses Goodwill related to the sale of business units Final purchase price allocations/contingent payments from prior year acquisitions Balance as of December 29, 2012 Goodwill Accumulated impairment losses Goodwill acquired during the year Impairment losses Goodwill related to the sale of business units Final purchase price allocations/contingent payments from prior year acquisitions Foreign currency translation adjustment Balance as of December 28, 2013 Goodwill Accumulated impairment losses Office Furniture Hearth Products Total $ $ 123,948 (29,359) 94,589 10,127 — — — 134,075 (29,359) 104,716 15,867 — — 1,720 151,662 (29,359) 122,303 — — — — (1,693) $ 166,188 (143) 166,045 — — — — 166,188 (143) 166,045 — — — — 166,188 (143) 166,045 — — — — — 149,969 (29,359) 120,610 $ 166,188 (143) 166,045 $ $ 290,136 (29,502) 260,634 10,127 — — — 300,263 (29,502) 270,761 15,867 — — 1,720 317,850 (29,502) 288,348 — — — — (1,693) 316,157 (29,502) 286,655 The goodwill increases relate to acquisitions completed. See the Business Combinations note. -55- Table of Contents Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses (In thousands) Trade accounts payable Compensation Profit sharing and retirement expense Marketing expenses Freight Other accrued expenses Long-Term Debt (In thousands) Note payable to bank, revolving credit facility with interest at a variable rate (2011-1.80%) Senior notes due in 2016 with interest at a fixed rate of 5.54% per annum. Other notes and amounts Total debt Less: current portion Long-term debt Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows: (In thousands) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter 2013 2012 2011 $ 199,889 $ 189,391 $ 159,292 40,072 23,686 37,292 15,682 91,178 36,671 20,821 32,979 12,826 91,556 36,067 19,284 30,653 13,816 92,538 $ 407,799 $ 384,244 $ 351,650 2013 2012 2011 $ — $ — $ 30,000 150,000 455 150,455 364 150,000 4,586 154,586 4,440 $ 150,091 $ 150,146 $ 150,000 437 180,437 30,237 150,200 $ $ 364 55 150,036 — — — On September 28, 2011, the Corporation, certain subsidiaries of the Corporation, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement"). The Credit Agreement amended and restated the Corporation's existing revolving credit facility dated June 11, 2010. The Corporation increased its borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement from $150 million to $250 million and has the option to increase its borrowing capacity by an additional $100 million. The Corporation also extended the term of the Existing Facility under the Credit Agreement from June 11, 2014, to the earlier of (i) September 28, 2016 or (ii) the date 90 days prior to the maturity date of the Corporation's senior notes (April 6, 2016), subject to certain exceptions. The Corporation effectively decreased (i) interest payable under the Credit Agreement by reducing the percentage spread applicable to both alternate base rate and traditional LIBOR revolving loans and (ii) the quarterly commitment fee payable by decreasing the rate range depending on the Corporation's consolidated leverage ratio. Amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement may be borrowed, repaid and reborrowed from time to time. The Corporation paid approximately $1.2 million of debt issuance costs that are being amortized straight-line over the term of the Credit Agreement. As of December 28, 2013, there was no amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility. On April 6, 2006, the Corporation refinanced $150 million of borrowings outstanding under a revolving credit facility with 5.54% percent ten-year unsecured Senior Notes due in 2016 issued through the private placement debt market. Interest payments are due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year and the principal is due in a lump sum in 2016. -56- Table of Contents Certain of the above borrowing arrangements include covenants which limit the assumption of additional debt and lease obligations. The Corporation has been, and currently is, in compliance with the covenants related to these debt agreements. The fair value of the Corporation’s outstanding variable rate long-term debt obligations at year-end 2013 approximates the carrying value. The fair value of the Corporation’s outstanding fixed rate long-term debt obligations is estimated based on discounted cash flow method (Level 2) to be $159 million at December 28, 2013, slightly above the carrying value of $150 million. Income Taxes Significant components of the provision for income taxes including those related to noncontrolling interest and discontinued operations are as follows: (In thousands) Current: Federal State Foreign Current provision Deferred: Federal State Foreign Deferred provision 2013 2012 2011 12,077 1,036 2,153 15,266 16,614 2,558 (1,100) 18,072 33,338 $ $ 19,132 2,460 1,175 22,767 6,692 603 (784) 6,511 29,278 $ $ 8,931 1,929 1,719 12,579 10,829 1,307 (304) 11,832 24,411 $ $ The differences between the actual tax expense and tax expense computed at the statutory U.S. Federal tax rate are explained as follows: Federal statutory tax expense State taxes, net of federal tax effect Credit for increasing research activities Deduction related to domestic production activities Foreign income tax differential Executive compensation limitation Valuation allowance Uncertain tax positions Other tax credits Other – net Total income tax expense 2013 2012 $ 33,957 $ 27,386 $ 2,469 (1,338) (1,396) (26) 320 — 773 (256) (1,165) 33,338 $ 2,164 — (1,192) (899) 1,672 — 611 — (464) 29,278 $ $ 2011 24,639 2,096 (942) (1,005) (629) 40 2 654 (203) (241) 24,411 Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. -57- Table of Contents Significant components of the Corporation’s deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows: (In thousands) Net long-term deferred tax liabilities: Compensation Stock-based compensation Accrued post-retirement benefit obligations OCI tax effected items Warranty Accrual Other – net Total long-term deferred tax assets Goodwill Tax over book depreciation Total long-term deferred tax liabilities Valuation allowance Total net long-term deferred tax liabilities Net current deferred tax assets: Allowance for doubtful accounts Vacation accrual Inventory differences Marketing accrual Warranty accrual Compensation Other – net Total current deferred tax assets Deferred income Prepaids Total current deferred tax liabilities Valuation allowance Total net current deferred tax assets Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets 2013 5,304 8,911 5,972 1,230 2,723 2,349 2012 5,399 7,069 5,918 2,585 2,565 3,362 26,489 (74,436) (20,081) $ (94,517) (936) (68,964) 26,898 (66,127) (12,720) $ (78,847) (919) (52,868) 1,859 3,706 3,695 1,317 2,412 7,821 7,371 28,181 (4,148) (7,339) (11,487) (643) 16,051 (52,913) $ 1,233 3,920 3,660 1,348 2,022 5,609 7,042 24,834 (3,949) (812) (4,761) (661) 19,412 (33,456) $ 2011 4,367 5,582 5,749 2,159 2,536 3,501 23,894 (56,878) (6,300) (63,178) (950) (40,234) 1,691 3,078 3,676 1,323 2,212 5,532 4,300 21,812 (3,933) (952) (4,885) (666) 16,261 (23,973) $ $ At December 28, 2013, the Corporation has approximately $22.2 million of U.S. state tax net operating losses and $3.3 million of U.S. state tax credits which expire over the next twenty years. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: (in thousands) Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of period Increases (decreases) in positions taken in a prior period Decreases in positions taken in a prior period Increases in positions taken in a current period Decrease due to settlements Decrease due to lapse of statute of limitations Unrecognized tax benefits, end of period 2013 2,927 156 (135) 791 — (930) 2,809 $ $ 2012 3,098 14 (8) 626 — (803) 2,927 $ $ 2011 3,193 492 (16) 670 — (1,241) 3,098 $ $ -58- Table of Contents The amount of unrecognized tax benefits which would impact the Corporation’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $2.7 million at December 28, 2013, $2.9 million at December 29, 2012 and $3.0 million at December 31, 2011. The Corporation recognized interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting. Interest and penalties recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income amounted to a benefit of $51,964. The Corporation had recorded a liability for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million as of December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. Tax years 2010 through 2013 remain open for examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"). The Corporation is currently under examination in various state jurisdictions, of which years 2008 through 2013 remain open to examination. As of December 28, 2013, it is reasonably possible the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease within the twelve months following the reporting date. These increases or decreases in the unrecognized tax benefits would be due to new positions that may be taken on income tax returns, settlement of tax positions and the closing of statutes of limitation. It is not expected any of the changes will be material individually or in total to the results or financial position of the Corporation. Deferred income taxes are provided to reflect differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. The Corporation provides for taxes that may be payable if undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries were to be remitted to the United States, except for those earnings it considers to be permanently reinvested. There were approximately $26.2 million of accumulated earnings considered permanently reinvested in Canada, China, Hong Kong and India as of December 28, 2013. The Corporation believes the U.S tax cost on unremitted foreign earnings would be approximately $7.9 million if the amounts were not considered permanently reinvested. Derivative Financial Instruments The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to adverse fluctuations in interest rates and diesel fuel. On the date a derivative is entered into, the Corporation designates the derivative as (i) a fair value hedge, (ii) a cash flow hedge, (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (iv) a risk management instrument not designated for hedge accounting. The Corporation recognizes all derivatives on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Interest Rate Risk In June 2008, the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap agreement, designated as a cash flow hedge, for purposes of managing its benchmark interest rate fluctuation risk. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the Corporation pays a fixed rate of interest and receives a variable rate of interest equal to the one-month LIBOR as determined on the last day of each monthly settlement period on an aggregated notional principal amount of $50 million. The net amount paid or received upon monthly settlements is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense, while the effective change in fair value is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the equity section of the Corporation's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The interest rate swap agreement matured on May 27, 2011. Diesel Fuel Risk The Corporation uses independent freight carriers to deliver its products. These carriers charge the Corporation a basic rate per mile that is subject to a mileage surcharge for diesel fuel price increases. The Corporation entered into variable to fixed rate commodity swap agreements beginning in April 2010 with two financial counterparties to manage fluctuations in fuel costs. The Corporation will hedge approximately 50% of its diesel fuel requirements for the next twelve months. The Corporation uses the hedge agreements to mitigate the volatility of diesel fuel prices and related fuel surcharges, and not to speculate on the future price of diesel fuel. The hedge agreements are designed to add stability to the Corporation's costs, enabling the Corporation to make pricing decisions and lessen the economic impact of abrupt changes in diesel fuel prices over the term of the contract. The hedging instruments consist of a series of financially settled fixed forward contracts with expiration dates ranging up to twelve months. The contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges of future diesel purchases, and as such, the net amount paid or received upon monthly settlements is recorded as an adjustment to freight expense, while the effective change in fair value is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the equity section of the Corporation's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 28, 2013, $0.1 million of deferred net gains, net of tax, included in equity ("Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" in the Corporation's Consolidated Balance Sheets) related to the diesel hedge agreements, are expected to be reclassified to current earnings ("Selling and administrative expense" in the Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Income) over the next twelve months. -59- Table of Contents The location and fair value of derivative instruments reported in the Corporation's Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows (in thousands): Diesel fuel swap Diesel fuel swap Balance Sheet Location Prepaid expenses and other current assets Accounts payable and accrued expenses Asset (Liability) Fair Value 2013 2012 2011 176 — 176 $ 123 (242) (119) $ 165 (256) (91) $ The effect of derivative instruments on the Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 28, 2013 was as follows (in thousands): Before-tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedge Relationship Diesel fuel swap Total $ 538 538 Locations of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Selling and administrative expense Before-Tax Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI Into Income (Effective Portion) $ 243 243 Locations of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) Selling and administrative expense Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) $ (2) (2) The effect of derivative instruments on the Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 29, 2012 was as follows (in thousands): Before-tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedge Relationship Diesel fuel swap Total $ 213 213 Locations of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Selling and administrative expense Before-Tax Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI Into Income (Effective Portion) $ 243 243 Locations of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) Selling and administrative expense Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) $ — — The effect of derivative instruments on the Corporation's Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was as follows (in thousands): Before-tax Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) $ $ 10 747 757 Locations of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Interest expense Selling and administrative expense Before-Tax Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI Into Income (Effective Portion) Locations of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) $ $ (898) None Selling and administrative expense 1,112 214 $ $ — — — Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedge Relationship Interest rate swap Diesel fuel swap Total -60- Table of Contents Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments For recognition purposes, on a recurring basis, the Corporation is required to measure at fair value its marketable securities and its investment in target funds. The marketable securities were comprised of investments in government securities, corporate bonds and money market funds. The target funds are reported as both current and noncurrent assets based on the portion anticipated to be used for current operations. When available, the Corporation uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such measurements within Level 1. In some cases where market prices are not available, the Corporation makes use of observable market based inputs (prices or quotes from published exchanges/indexes) to calculate fair value using the market approach, in which case the measurements are classified within Level 2. Assets measured at fair value for the year ended December 28, 2013 were as follows: (in thousands) Government securities Corporate bonds Derivative financial instrument $ Fair value as of measurement date Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) 11,254 4,859 176 $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ 11,254 4,859 176 $ $ $ — — — Assets measured at fair value for the year ended December 29, 2012 were as follows: (in thousands) Government securities Corporate bonds Derivative financial instrument $ Fair value as of measurement date Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) 15,295 5,061 $ $ (119) $ — $ — $ — $ 15,295 $ 5,061 $ (119) $ — — — Assets measured at fair value for the Corporation’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows: (in thousands) Government securities Corporate bonds Derivative financial instrument $ Fair value as of measurement date Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) 15,863 3,751 $ $ (91) $ — $ — $ — $ 15,863 $ 3,751 $ (91) $ — — — -61- $ $ $ $ $ $ Table of Contents Shareholders’ Equity Common Stock, $1 Par Value Authorized Issued and outstanding Preferred Stock, $1 Par Value Authorized Issued and outstanding 2013 2012 2011 200,000,000 200,000,000 200,000,000 44,981,865 44,950,703 44,855,207 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 — — — The Corporation purchased 740,000; 800,000; and 323,965 shares of its common stock during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The par value method of accounting is used for common stock repurchases. The following table summarizes the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income loss: (in thousands) Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment Unrealized Gains Losses) on Marketable Securities Pension Postretirement Liability Derivative Financial Instruments Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Balance at January 1, 2011 $ 4,415 $ Change during year Less: Taxes Balance at December 31, 2011 Change during year Less: Taxes Balance at December 29, 2012 Other comprehensive income before reclassifications Less: Taxes Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax 796 — 5,211 264 — 5,475 (2,562) — — Balance at December 28, 2013 $ 2,913 $ (48) $ 294 103 143 95 33 205 (191) (67) (2,313) $ (2,035) (765) (3,583) (1,132) (424) (4,291) 3,389 1,312 (395) $ 543 204 (56) (30) (10) (76) 538 197 — 81 $ 74 (2,140) $ (154) 111 $ 1,659 (402) (458) 1,715 (803) (401) 1,313 1,174 1,442 (80) 965 -62- Table of Contents The following table details the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 28, 2013 (in thousands): Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Affected Line Item in the Statement Where Net Income Is Presented Pension postretirement liability Transition obligation Derivative financial instruments Diesel hedge Total reclassifications for the period $ $ $ $ $ (117) Selling and administrative expenses 43 Tax (expense) or benefit (74) Net of tax 243 Selling and administrative expenses (89) Tax (expense) or benefit 154 Net of tax 80 Net of tax In May 2007, the Corporation registered 300,000 shares of its common stock under its 2007 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation, as amended (the “Director Plan”). The Director Plan permits the Corporation to issue to its non- employee directors options to purchase shares of Corporation common stock, restricted stock or restricted stock units of the Corporation and awards of Corporation common stock. The Director Plan also permits non-employee directors to elect to receive all or a portion of their annual retainers and other compensation in the form of shares of Corporation common stock. During 2013, 2012, and 2011, 26,520; 42,620; and 32,487 shares, respectively, of Corporation common stock were issued under the Director Plan. Cash dividends declared and paid per share for each year are: (In dollars) Common shares 2013 0.96 2012 0.95 2011 0.92 During 2007, shareholders approved the 2002 Members’ Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"), as amended January 1, 2007. Under the plan, 800,000 shares of common stock were initially registered for issuance to participating members. On June 12, 2009, an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock were registered for issuance to participating members. Beginning on June 30, 2002, rights to purchase stock are granted on a quarterly basis to all participating members who customarily work 20 hours or more per week and for five months or more in any calendar year. The price of the stock purchased under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the closing price on the exercise date. No member may purchase stock under the Purchase Plan in an amount which exceeds a maximum fair value of $25,000 in any calendar year. During 2013, 86,291 shares of common stock were issued under the Purchase Plan at an average price of $25.63. During 2012, 106,592 shares of common stock were issued under the plan at an average price of $18.86. During 2011, 104,379 shares of common stock were issued under the Purchase Plan at an average price of $17.39. An additional 531,207 shares were available for issuance under the Purchase Plan at December 28, 2013. The Corporation has entered into change in control employment agreements with certain officers. According to the agreements, a change in control occurs when a third person or entity becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the Corporation’s common stock, when more than one-third of the Board is composed of persons not recommended by at least three-fourths of the incumbent Board, upon certain business combinations involving the Corporation or, upon approval by the Corporation’s shareholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution. Upon a change in control, a key member is deemed to have a two-year employment agreement with the Corporation, and all of his or her benefits vest under the Corporation’s compensation plans. If, at any time within two years of the change in control, his or her employment is terminated by the Corporation for any reason other than cause or disability, or by the key member for good reason, as such terms are defined in the agreement, then the key member is entitled to receive, among other benefits, a severance payment equal to two times (three times for the Corporation’s Chairman, President and CEO) annual salary and the average of the prior two years’ bonuses. -63- Table of Contents Stock-Based Compensation Under the Corporation’s 2007 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective May 8, 2007, as amended, the Corporation may award options to purchase shares of the Corporation’s common stock and grant other stock awards to executives, managers and key personnel. Upon shareholder approval of the Plan in May 2007, no future awards were granted under the Corporation’s 1995 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, but all outstanding awards previously granted under that plan shall remain outstanding in accordance with their terms. As of December 28, 2013, there were approximately 4.6 million shares available for future issuance under the Plan. The Plan is administered by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board. Restricted stock units awarded under the Plan are expensed ratably over the vesting period of the awards. Stock options awarded to members under the Plan must be at exercise prices equal to or exceeding the fair market value of the Corporation’s common stock on the date of grant. Stock options are generally subject to four-year cliff vesting and must be exercised within 10 years from the date of grant. As discussed above, the Corporation also has the shareholder approved Purchase Plan. The price of the stock purchased under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the closing price on the applicable purchase date. During 2013, 86,291 shares of the Corporation’s common stock were issued under the Purchase Plan at an average price of $25.63. The Corporation measures the cost of employee services in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognizes cost over the requisite service period. Compensation cost charged against operations for the Plan and Purchase Plan described above was $7.5 million, $6.4 million and $7.2 million for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $2.6 million, $2.3 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The stock compensation expense for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions by grant year: Expected term Expected volatility: Range used Weighted-average Expected dividend yield: Range used Weighted-average Risk-free interest rate: Range used Year Ended Dec. 28, 2013 Year Ended Dec. 29, 2012 Year Ended Dec. 31, 2011 5 years 6 years 6 years 50.39% 48.25%-48.34% 50.39% 48.25% 45.22% 45.22% 3.02% 3.02% 2.90%-3.61% 2.88%-3.42% 3.60% 2.90% 0.93% 0.90%-1.17% 1.99%-3.70% Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility as the Corporation does not feel that future volatility over the expected term of the options is likely to differ from the past. The Corporation used a simple-average calculation method based on monthly frequency points for the prior seven years. The Corporation normally uses the current dividend yield as there are no plans to substantially increase or decrease its dividends. The Corporation uses historical exercise experience to determine the expected term. The risk-free interest rate was selected based on yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the options being valued. -64- Table of Contents The following table summarizes the changes in outstanding stock options since the beginning of fiscal 2011. Outstanding at January 1, 2011 Granted Exercised Forfeited or Expired Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Granted Exercised Forfeited or Expired Outstanding at December 29, 2012 Granted Exercised Forfeited or Expired Outstanding at December 28, 2013 Number of Shares 2,564,799 499,735 (34,000) (33,783) 2,996,751 727,381 (149,000) (118,618) 3,456,514 611,599 (394,476) (43,070) 3,630,567 Weighted- Average Exercise Price 27.65 31.82 26.45 30.84 28.33 25.51 25.80 24.99 27.96 31.79 14.86 35.05 29.94 $ $ $ $ A summary of the Corporation’s nonvested shares as of December 28, 2013 and changes during the year are presented below: Nonvested Shares Nonvested at December 29, 2012 Granted Vested Forfeited Nonvested at December 28, 2013 Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value 7.75 10.85 7.47 10.52 8.53 Shares 2,372,450 $ 611,599 (445,398) (23,053) 2,515,598 $ At December 28, 2013, there was $7.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock option awards, which the Corporation expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years. Information about stock options vested or expected to vest and are exercisable at December 28, 2013, is as follows: Options Vested or expected to vest Exercisable Weighted- Average Exercise Price 29.94 $ 34.85 $ Number 3,536,230 1,114,969 Weighted- Average Remaining Life in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000s) $ 6.1 2.8 33,382 5,051 The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted was $10.85, $8.32 and $11.58, for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Other information for the last three years is as follows: (In thousands) Total fair value of shares vested Total intrinsic value of options exercised Cash received from exercise of stock options Tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options Dec. 28, 2013 Dec. 29, 2012 Dec. 31, 2011 $ 1,127 $ 3,005 $ 2,150 6,445 5,862 2,291 388 3,845 138 178 232 63 -65- Table of Contents In 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation issued restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to executives, managers and key personnel. The RSUs vest at the end of three years after the grant date. No dividends are accrued on the RSUs. The share-based compensation expense associated with the RSUs is based on the quoted market price of HNI Corporation shares on the date of grant less the discounted present value of dividends not received on the shares and is amortized using the straight-line method from the grant date through the earlier of the vesting date or the estimated retirement eligibility date. The following table summarizes the changes in outstanding RSUs since the beginning of fiscal 2011: Outstanding at January 1, 2011 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 29, 2012 Granted Vested Forfeited Outstanding at December 28, 2013 Number of Shares Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value 802,797 14,000 (16,048) (13,944) 786,805 10,526 (631,759) (8,352) 157,220 — (132,693) — 24,527 $ $ $ $ 10.37 24.37 7.84 13.94 10.61 21.19 7.87 22.02 21.71 — 21.47 — 23.01 At December 28, 2013, there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs which the Corporation expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 0.7 year. The total value of shares vested in 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $2.8 million, $5.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Retirement Benefits The Corporation has defined contribution profit-sharing plans covering substantially all employees who are not participants in certain defined benefit plans. The Corporation’s annual contribution to the defined contribution plans is based on employee eligible earnings and results of operations and amounted to $23.3 million, $20.8 million, and $19.6 million, in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. A portion of the annual contribution is in the form of common stock of the Corporation. The amount of the stock contribution was $6.1 million, $5.4 million, and $4.9 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The Corporation sponsors a defined benefit plan which covers a limited number of former salaried and hourly members. The Corporation’s funding policy is generally to contribute annually the minimum actuarially computed amount. Net pension costs relating to these plans were $185,000, $281,000 and $196,000, in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The actuarial present value of obligations, less related plan assets at fair value, is not significant. -66- Table of Contents Postretirement Health Care Guidance on employers’ accounting for other postretirement plans requires recognition of the overfunded or underfunded status on the balance sheet. Under this guidance, gains and losses, prior services costs and credits and any remaining transition amounts under previous guidance not yet recognized through net periodic benefit cost are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. Also, the measurement date – the date at which the benefit obligation and plan assets are measured – is required to be the Corporation’s fiscal year-end. (In thousands) Change in benefit obligation 2013 2012 2011 Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 18,547 $ 16,872 $ 15,411 Service cost Interest cost Benefits paid Actuarial (gain)/loss Benefit obligation at end of year Change in plan assets Fair value at beginning of year Actual return on assets Employer contribution Transferred out Benefits paid Fair value at end of year Funded Status of Plan Amounts recognized in the Statement of Financial Position consist of: Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (before tax) consist of: Actuarial (gain)/loss Transition (asset)/obligation Prior service cost Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (before tax): Amount disclosed at beginning of year Actuarial (gain)/loss Amortization of actuarial gain or loss Amortization of transition amount Amortization of prior service cost Amount disclosed at end of year 525 668 (1,263) (2,029) 16,448 450 721 (1,131) 1,635 364 804 (909) 1,202 $ 18,547 $ 16,872 — $ — 1,263 — (1,263) — $ — 1,131 — (1,131) — $ (16,448) $ — $ (18,547) $ — — 909 — (909) — (16,872) 924 15,524 $ $ 994 17,554 $ $ 988 15,884 (900) $ — — (900) $ $ 1,246 (2,029) — (117) — (900) $ 1,129 $ 117 — 1,246 $ 118 $ 1,635 — (507) — 1,246 $ (506) 624 — 118 (593) 1,202 17 (508) — 118 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ -67- Table of Contents Estimated Future Benefit Payments (In thousands) Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal 2019 – 2023 Expected Contributions During Fiscal 2014 Total 924 928 943 971 995 5,773 $ 924 The discount rates at fiscal year-end 2013, 2012 and 2011, were 4.6%, 3.7% and 4.4%, respectively. The Corporation payment for these benefits has reached the maximum amounts per the plan; therefore, healthcare trend rates have no impact on the Corporation’s cost. There were no funds designated as plan assets. Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (in thousands) Service cost Interest cost Amortization of net (gain)/loss Amortization of unrecognized transition (asset)/obligation Net periodic postretirement benefit cost/(income) 2014 504 735 — — 1,239 $ $ A discount rate of 4.6% was used to determine net periodic benefit cost for 2014. The discount rate is set at the measurement date to reflect the yield of a portfolio of high quality, fixed income debt instruments. There are no plan assets invested. Leases The Corporation leases certain warehouse and plant facilities and equipment. Commitments for minimum rentals under non- cancelable leases at the end of 2013 are as follows: Capitalized Leases Operating Leases $ $ 129 108 28,754 24,457 20,394 8,725 5,662 14,067 102,059 — — — — 237 $ 11 226 (In thousands) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total minimum lease payments Less: amount representing interest Present value of net minimum lease payments, including current maturities of $ $ -68- Table of Contents Property, plant and equipment at year-end include the following amounts for capitalized leases: (In thousands) Office equipment Less: allowances for depreciation 2013 570 346 224 $ $ 2012 570 232 338 $ $ 2011 570 118 452 $ $ Rent expense for the years 2013, 2012 and 2011, amounted to approximately $41.5 million, $37.6 million and $29.1 million, respectively. There was no contingent rent expense under either capitalized and operating leases (generally based on mileage of transportation equipment) for the years 2013, 2012, and 2011. Guarantees, Commitments and Contingencies The Corporation utilizes letters of credit in the amount of $11 million to back certain financing instruments, insurance policies and payment obligations. The letters of credit reflect fair value as a condition of their underlying purpose and are subject to fees competitively determined. The Corporation is involved in various kinds of disputes and legal proceedings that have arisen in the course of its business, including pending litigation, environmental remediation, taxes and other claims. It is the Corporation’s opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, that additional liabilities, if any, resulting from these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s quarterly or annual operating results and cash flows when resolved in a future period. Reportable Segment Information Management views the Corporation as being in two reportable segments based on industries: office furniture and hearth products, with the former being the principal segment. The aggregated office furniture segment manufactures and markets a broad line of metal and wood commercial and home office furniture which includes storage products, desks, credenzas, chairs, tables, bookcases, freestanding office partitions and panel systems and other related products. The hearth products segment manufactures and markets a broad line of gas, electric, wood and biomass burning fireplaces, inserts, stoves, facings and accessories, principally for the home. For purposes of segment reporting, intercompany sales transfers between segments are not material, and operating profit is income before income taxes exclusive of certain unallocated corporate expenses. These unallocated corporate expenses include the net costs of the Corporation’s corporate operations, interest income and interest expense. Management views interest income and expense as corporate financing costs and not as a reportable segment cost. In addition, management applies an effective income tax rate to its consolidated income before income taxes so income taxes are not reported or viewed internally on a segment basis. Identifiable assets by segment are those assets applicable to the respective industry segments. Corporate assets consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, long-term investments and corporate office real estate and related equipment. No geographic information for revenues from external customers or for long-lived assets is disclosed since the Corporation’s primary market and capital investments are concentrated in the United States. -69- Table of Contents Reportable segment data reconciled to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended 2013, 2012, and 2011, is as follows for continuing operations: (In thousands) Net sales: Office furniture Hearth products Operating profit: Office furniture (a) Hearth products (b) Total operating profit Unallocated corporate expenses Income (loss) before income taxes Depreciation and amortization expense: Office furniture Hearth products General corporate Capital expenditures (including capitalized software): Office furniture Hearth products General corporate Identifiable assets: Office furniture Hearth products General corporate 2013 2012 2011 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,685,205 374,759 2,059,964 97,339 46,662 144,001 (47,294) 96,707 36,992 5,288 4,341 46,621 51,954 4,220 22,721 78,895 722,697 255,978 156,030 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,687,302 316,701 2,004,003 91,849 26,477 118,326 (40,722) 77,604 34,491 5,958 2,911 43,360 36,080 2,008 22,182 60,270 700,665 254,835 121,566 1,528,050 305,400 1,833,450 99,626 14,752 114,378 (44,219) 70,159 36,109 7,574 2,604 46,287 24,061 2,179 4,903 31,143 671,334 259,142 121,246 1,134,705 $ 1,077,066 $ 1,051,722 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (a) Included in operating profit for the office furniture segment are pretax charges of $0.3 million, $1.9 million and $2.8 million, for closing of facilities and impairment charges in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (b) Included in operating profit for the hearth products segment are pretax charges of $0.4 million for closing facilities in 2011. The Corporation's net sales by product category were as follows for the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011: (in thousands) Systems and storage Seating Other Hearth products 2013 2012 2011 1,132,885 1,126,272 1,072,629 469,220 83,100 374,759 452,923 108,107 316,701 399,264 56,157 305,400 2,059,964 2,004,003 1,833,450 -70- Table of Contents Summary of Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly financial information for each of the past 12 quarters. In the opinion of the Corporation’s management, this information has been prepared on the same basis as the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report and includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to state fairly the financial results set forth herein. Results of operations for any previous quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. Year-End 2013: (In thousands, except per share data) First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $ 442,297 $ 510,698 $ 565,706 $ Net sales Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges (income) Operating income (loss) Interest income (expense) – net Income (loss) before income taxes Income taxes Net income (loss) Less: net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation $ Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation per common share – basic $ Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation per common share – diluted $ Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted As a Percentage of Net Sales Net sales Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges Operating income (loss) Income taxes Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation 294,515 147,782 144,556 156 3,070 (2,516) 554 (625) 1,179 (229) 1,408 0.03 $ $ 336,040 174,658 154,538 (35) 20,155 (2,567) 17,588 6,189 11,399 (22) 11,421 0.25 $ $ 365,835 199,871 154,641 115 45,115 (2,668) 42,447 14,398 28,049 (45) 28,094 0.62 $ $ 541,263 348,282 192,981 155,237 97 37,647 (1,529) 36,118 13,376 22,742 (18) 22,760 0.50 45,154,764 45,412,668 45,317,912 45,117,315 0.03 $ 0.25 $ 0.61 $ 0.50 45,719,878 46,109,563 46,089,580 45,964,128 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.4 32.7 — 0.7 (0.1) 0.3 34.2 30.3 — 3.9 1.2 2.2 35.3 27.3 — 8.0 2.5 5.0 35.7 28.7 — 7.0 2.5 4.2 -71- Table of Contents Year-End 2012: (In thousands, except per share data) First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter $ 445,212 $ 480,400 $ 550,855 $ Net sales Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges Operating income (loss) Interest income (expense) – net Income (loss) before income taxes Income taxes Net income (loss) Less: net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation $ Net income (loss) per common share – basic Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic Net income (loss) per common share – diluted Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted $ $ As a Percentage of Net Sales Net sales Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges Operating income (loss) Income taxes Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation 298,385 146,827 143,734 897 2,196 (2,435) (239) (86) (153) (12) (141) $ — $ 45,152 — $ 45,152 315,287 165,113 151,455 292 13,366 (2,633) 10,733 3,835 6,898 (127) 7,025 0.15 45,420 0.15 45,945 $ $ $ 359,519 191,336 149,421 172 41,743 (2,503) 39,240 15,036 24,204 (286) 24,490 0.54 45,224 0.53 45,820 $ $ $ 527,536 341,585 185,951 155,046 583 30,322 (2,452) 27,870 10,493 17,377 (216) 17,593 0.39 45,050 0.39 45,692 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.0 32.3 0.2 0.5 — — 34.4 31.5 0.1 2.8 0.8 1.5 34.7 27.1 — 7.6 2.7 4.4 35.2 29.4 0.1 5.7 2.0 3.3 -72- Table of Contents Year-End 2011: (In thousands, except per share data) First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Net sales Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges Operating income (loss) Interest income (expense) – net Income (loss) before income taxes Income taxes Net income (loss) Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation $ Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation per common share – basic Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation per common share – diluted $ Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted As a Percentage of Net Sales Net sales Gross profit Selling and administrative expenses Restructuring related charges Operating income (loss) Income taxes Net income (loss) attributable to HNI Corporation $ 396,151 $ 432,810 $ 504,220 $ 261,427 134,724 132,413 1,390 921 (3,456) (2,535) (738) (1,797) (42) (1,755) 285,880 146,930 136,197 463 10,270 (2,923) 7,347 2,744 4,603 (54) 4,657 0.10 $ $ 324,825 179,395 138,671 277 40,447 (2,345) 38,102 13,186 24,916 (31) 24,947 0.56 $ $ $ $ $ (0.04) 500,269 322,255 178,014 147,034 1,131 29,849 (2,604) 27,245 9,219 18,026 (111) 18,137 0.40 44,853 44,745 44,787 44,828 (0.04) $ 0.10 $ 0.55 $ 0.40 44,853 45,667 45,637 45,759 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 34.0 33.4 0.4 0.2 (0.2) (0.4) 33.9 31.5 0.1 2.4 0.6 1.1 35.6 27.5 0.1 8.0 2.6 4.9 35.6 29.4 0.2 6.0 1.8 3.6 -73- Table of Contents INVESTOR INFORMATION Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends (Unaudited) Quarterly 2013 – 2011 2013 by Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Dividends Paid 2012 by Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Dividends Paid 2011 by Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Dividends Paid $ $ $ High Low Dividends per Share 35.74 $ 38.53 40.73 40.10 High Low $ 32.01 27.95 32.02 30.24 High Low 36.48 $ 32.78 26.40 27.75 28.28 31.45 32.38 32.83 24.97 21.57 25.39 25.08 28.42 22.04 15.78 17.14 Dividends per Share Dividends per Share Common Stock Market Price and Price/Earnings Ratio (Unaudited) Fiscal Years 2013 – 2009 $ Year 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Five-Year Average Market Price High 40.73 $ 32.02 36.48 35.29 29.40 Low 28.28 $ 21.57 15.78 22.80 7.70 Diluted Earnings per Share 1.39 1.07 1.01 0.59 (0.14) Price/Earnings Ratio High 29 30 36 60 (210) (11) 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.96 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.95 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.92 Low 20 20 16 39 (55) 8 -74- Table of Contents SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS HNI CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES December 28, 2013 COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E ADDITIONS (1) CHARGED TO COSTS AND EXPENSES (2) CHARGED TO OTHER ACCOUNTS (DESCRIBE) BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD DEDUCTIONS (DESCRIBE) BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD DESCRIPTION (In thousands) Year ended December 28, 2013: Allowance for doubtful accounts Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset Year ended December 29, 2012: Allowance for doubtful accounts Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset Year ended December 31, 2011: Allowance for doubtful accounts Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,151 1,580 4,838 1,616 5,479 1,630 $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,590 — 870 — 1,889 2 Note A: Represents amounts written off, net of recoveries and other adjustments. — $ 1,533 (A) $ — 1 (A) $ — $ 557 (A) $ — 36 (A) $ — $ 2,530 (A) $ — 16 6,208 1,579 5,151 1,580 4,838 1,616 -75- Table of Contents ITEM 15(c) - INDEX OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Number Description of Document (3.1) (3.2) (10.1) (10.2) (10.3) (10.4) (10.5) (10.6) (10.7) (10.8) (10.09) (10.10) (10.11) (10.12) (10.13) (10.14) (10.15) (10.16) Articles of Incorporation of HNI Corporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010 By-laws of HNI Corporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 HNI Corporation 2007 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 9, 2013* 2007 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation, as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010* Form of HNI Corporation Change In Control Employment Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 16, 2006* HNI Corporation Supplemental Income Plan (f/k/a HNI Corporation ERISA Supplemental Retirement Plan), as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2010* Form of HNI Corporation Amended and Restated Indemnity Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 14, 2007* Form of 2007 Equity Plan For Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation Participation Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010* Form of HNI Corporation 2007 Stock-Based Compensation Plan Stock Option Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2009* Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, including all schedules and exhibits, dated as of September 28, 2011, by and among HNI Corporation, as Borrower, certain domestic subsidiaries of HNI Corporation, as Guarantors, certain lenders party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 3, 2011 HNI Corporation Long-Term Performance Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Registrant's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A dated March 26, 2010, for the Registrant's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 11, 2010* HNI Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010* Note Purchase Agreement dated as of April 6, 2006, by and among HNI Corporation and the Purchasers named therein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 2006 HNI Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010* HNI Corporation Annual Incentive Plan (f/k/a HNI Corporation Executive Bonus Plan), as amended and restated, incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A dated March 26, 2010, for the Registrant's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 11, 2010* Form of HNI Corporation Amendment No. 1 to Change in Control Employment Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2007* Form of HNI Corporation 2007 Stock-Based Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2009 (for restricted stock unit awards granted in 2009)* HNI Corporation Stock-Based Compensation Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006* -76- Table of Contents Exhibit Number Description of Document (10.17) (10.18) (10.19) (10.20) (10.21) (21) (23) (31.1) (31.2) (32.1) 101 Form of Exercise of Stock Option granted under the HNI Corporation Stock-Based Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008* Form of HNI Corporation Stock-Based Compensation Plan Stock Option Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99D to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2005* Form of HNI Corporation 2007 Stock-Based Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 (for restricted stock unit awards granted in 2010)* Form of HNI Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan Deferral Election Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010* Form of HNI Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan Deferral Election Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010* Subsidiaries of the Registrant+ Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm+ Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002+ Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002+ Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002+ The following materials from HNI Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) and furnished electronically herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(a) Indicates management contract or compensatory plan. Filed herewith. * + (a) Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. -77- Performance Graph Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Return HNI Corporation S&P 500 OFIG* $300 $275 $250 $225 $200 $175 $150 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Annual Return HNI Corporation S&P500 OFIG* 2008 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 2009 $179.1 $122.5 $114.9 2010 $208.8 $140.9 $176.7 2011 $181.5 $143.9 $135.2 2012 $209.2 $164.1 $192.1 2013 $291.8 $220.0 $253.3 *The Office Furniture Industry Group (OFIG) is a composite peer index constructed by the Corporation weighted by market capitalization and comprised of the following companies: Herman Miller, Inc.; Kimball International, Inc., Knoll, Inc. and Steelcase Inc. It is weighted at the beginning of each quarter according to the market capitalization of its constituents on the last trading day of the Corporation's prior fiscal quarter. Total returns for HNI Corporation, S&P 500 and OFIG are depicted at the end of Corporation's fiscal years. The total return assumes $100.00 invested in each of the Corporation's common stock, the S&P 500 and OFIG stocks at the end of the Corporation's 2008 fiscal year, plus further reinvestment of dividends on the date of dividend payment. S&P 500 returns assume S&P 500 dividends are paid and reinvested on the last trading day of each of the Corporation's fiscal quarters. The comparative performance of the Corporation's common stock against the indexes as depicted in this graph is dependent on the price of stock at a particular measurement point in time. Since individual stocks are more volatile than broader stock indexes, the perceived comparative performance of the Corporation's common stock may vary based on the strength or weakness of the stock price at the new measurement point used in each future performance graph. For this reason, the Corporation does not believe this graph should be considered as the sole indicator of the Corporation's performance. -78- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Stan A. Askren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, HNI Corporation James R. Jenkins Retired Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Deere & Company Dennis J. Martin President and Chief Executive Officer, Federal Signal Corporation Larry B. Porcellato Chief Executive Officer, The Homax Group, Inc. Mary H. Bell Vice President, Building Construction Products Division, Caterpillar Inc. Miguel M. Calado Director and Chief Financial Officer, Hovione SA Cheryl A. Francis Co-Chairman, Corporate Leadership Center Public Policy and Corporate Governance Larry B. Porcellato, Chairperson James R. Jenkins Abbie J. Smith *Lead Director Abbie J. Smith Chaired Professor, University of Chicago Booth School of Business Brian E. Stern Director, Starboard Capital Partners, LLC Ronald V. Waters, III* Independent Business Consultant, Former Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, LoJack Corporation COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD Audit Mary H. Bell, Chairperson Cheryl A. Francis Brian E. Stern Human Resources and Compensation Dennis J. Martin, Chairperson Miguel M. Calado Ronald V. Waters, III HNI CORPORATION OFFICERS COMPANIES Stan A. Askren Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Richard K. Johnson Vice President and Chief Information Officer Redus W. Brooks President, Maxon Richard P. Fox Vice President and General Manager, HBF Todd C. Birlingmair Treasurer Steven M. Bradford Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Gary L. Carlson Vice President, Member and Community Relations Tamara S. Feldman Vice President, Financial Reporting Matthew D. McGough Vice President, Corporate Finance Peter C. M. Chu President, Lamex Alan R. Moorhead Vice President, Internal Audit Kurt A. Tjaden Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Bradley D. Determan Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation; President, Hearth & Home Technologies Jerald K. Dittmer Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation; President, The HON Company Mona K. Hoffman President, Paoli Eric F. Jackson President, Artcobell Jeffrey D. Lorenger Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation; President, HNI Contract Furniture Group Donald T. Mead Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation; President, Gunlocke Marco V. Molinari Executive Vice President, HNI Corporation; President, HNI International; Acting Managing Director, BP Ergo Mark R. Roumfort President, Allsteel INVESTOR INFORMATION Fiscal 2014 Quarter-End Dates 1st Quarter: Sat., March 29 2nd Quarter: Sat., June 28 3rd Quarter: Sat., September 27 4th Quarter: Sat., January 3, 2015 Annual Meeting The Corporation’s annual shareholders’ meeting will be held at 10:30 a.m. on Tuesday, May 6, 2014, at the Allsteel Corporate Headquarters, 2210 Second Avenue, Muscatine, Iowa. Shareholders and other interested investors are encour- aged to attend the meeting. Form 10-K Report All financial information, including the Corporation’s annual report on Form 10-K, can be accessed on the Corporation’s website at www.hnicorp.com. Corporate Headquarters and Investor Relations HNI Corporation 408 East Second Street P.O. Box 1109 Muscatine, IA 52761-0071 Telephone: 563.272.7400 Company Fax: 563.272.7114 Investor Relations Fax: 563.272.7655 Investor Relations Email: investorrelations@hnicorp.com Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP One North Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Common Stock HNI Corporation common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol: HNI. Transfer Agent Shareholders may report a change of address or make inquiries by writing or calling: Wells Fargo Shareowner Services 1110 Centre Point Curve, Suite 101 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Telephone: 800.468.9716 Our Vision We, the members of HNI Corporation, are dedicated to creating long-term value for all of our stakeholders, to exceeding our customers’ expectations and to making our company a great place to work. We will always treat each other, as well as customers, suppliers, shareholders and our communities, with fairness and respect. Our success depends upon business simplification, rapid continuous improvement and innovation in everything we do, individual and collective integrity, and the relentless pursuit of the following long-standing beliefs: WE WILL BE PROFITABLE. WE WILL BE A GREAT PLACE TO WORK. We pursue mutually profitable relationships with We pursue a participative environment and support a customers and suppliers. Only when our company culture that encourages and recognizes excellence, achieves an adequate profit can the other elements of active involvement, ongoing learning and contributions this Vision be realized. WE WILL CREATE LONG-TERM VALUE FOR SHAREHOLDERS. We create long-term value for shareholders by earning financial returns significantly greater than our cost of capital and pursuing profitable growth opportunities. of each member; that seeks out and values diversity; and that attracts and retains the most capable people who work safely, are motivated and are devoted to making our company and our members successful. WE WILL BE A RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE CITIZEN. We will safeguard our shareholders’ equity by maintain- We conduct our business in a way that sustains the ing a strong balance sheet to allow flexibility in well-being of society, our environment and the econ- responding to a continuously changing market and omy in which we live and work. We follow ethical and business environment. WE WILL PURSUE PROFITABLE GROWTH. legal business practices. Our company supports our volunteer efforts and provides charitable contributions so that we can actively participate in the civic, cultural, We pursue profitable growth on a global basis in order educational, environmental and governmental affairs of to provide continued job opportunities for members our society. and financial success for all stakeholders. WE WILL BE A SUPPLIER OF QUALITY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. We provide reliable products and services of high quality and brand value to our end-users. Our products and services exceed our customers’ expectations and enable our distributors and our company to make a fair profit. TO OUR STAKEHOLDERS: When our company is appreciated by its members, favored by its customers, supported by its suppliers, respected by the public and admired by its shareholders, this Vision is fulfilled. HNI Corporation • 408 East Second Street, Muscatine, Iowa 52761 • www.hnicorp.com 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above