A
S
t
r
o
n
g
e
r
F
u
t
u
r
e
H
o
l
l
y
F
r
o
n
t
i
e
r
2
0
1
1
A
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2828 North Harwood
Suite 1300
Dallas, Texas 75201-1507
A Stronger Future2011 AnnuAl RepoRt
Our mission is to be the premier U.S. petroleum refining, pipeline and terminal
company as measured by superior financial performance and sustainable,
profitable growth.
We seek to accomplish this by operating in a safe, reliable and environmentally responsible manner, efficiently operating
our existing assets, offering our customers superior products and services, and growing both organically and through
strategic acquisitions.
We strive to outperform our competition through the quality and development of our employees and assets. We endeavor
to maintain an inclusive and stimulating work environment that enables each employee to fully contribute to and participate
in our Company’s success.
HollyFrontier Corporation (NYSE: HFC) is among the largest independent petroleum refiners in the United States with operations
throughout the Mid-Continent, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Regions. We produce and market gasoline, diesel, jet fuel,
asphalt, heavy products and specialty lubricant products. The Company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas and operates five
complex refineries with 443,000 barrels per stream day (BPSD) of crude oil processing capacity. The Company owns a 42% interest
in Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP) and a 75% interest in the UNEV pipeline.
our ValueS
HeALtH
& SAFety
We put health and safety first. We conduct our business with primary emphasis on the health and
safety of our employees, contractors and neighboring communities. We continuously strive to raise
the bar, guided by our health and safety performance standards.
environMentAL
SteWArdSHiP
We care about the environment. We are committed to minimizing environmental impacts by reducing
wastes, emissions and other releases. We understand that it is a privilege to conduct our business in the
communities where we operate.
corPorAte
citizenSHiP
We obey the law. We are committed to promoting sustainable social and economic benefits wherever
we operate.
HoneSty
& reSPect
We tell the truth and respect others. We uphold high standards of business ethics and integrity,
enforce strict principles of corporate governance and support transparency in all our operations. One
of our greatest assets is our reputation for behaving ethically in the interests of employees, shareholders,
customers, business partners and the communities in which we operate and serve.
continuouS
iMProveMent
We continually improve. Innovation and high performance are our way of life. Our culture creates
a fulfilling environment which enables employees to reach their potential. We believe in creating our
own destiny and that a constructive attitude toward change is essential.
HollyFrontier corporation 2011 Annual report
C o r p o r a T e i N f o r m a T i o N
c o rP o rAt e o F F i c e r S
S t o c k t r A n S F e r A g e n t A n d r e g i S t r A r
Matthew P. Clifton
Executive Chairman
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and President
Doug S. Aron
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
David L. Lamp
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
George J. Damiris
Senior Vice President, Supply and Marketing
Bruce R. Shaw
Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development
James M. Stump
Senior Vice President, Refining Operations
Denise C. McWatters
Vice President and General Counsel
Scott C. Surplus
Vice President and Controller
B oA r d oF d i r e c t o r S
Matthew P. Clifton
Chairman of the Board
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and President
Douglas Y. Bech
Buford P. Berry
Leldon E. Echols
R. Kevin Hardage
Robert J. Kostelnik
James H. Lee
Robert. G. McKenzie
Franklin Myers
Michael E. Rose
Tommy A. Valenta
c o r P o r At e o F F i c e
HollyFrontier Corporation
2828 North Harwood, Suite 1300
Dallas, TX 75201-1507
214-871-3555
www.hollyfrontier.com
A u d i t o r S
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
1.800.937.5449
www.amstock.com
Correspondence or questions concerning share holdings,
transfers, lost certificates, dividends, or address or registration
changes should be directed to American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company.
S t o c k e xc H A n g e L i S t i n g
New York Stock Exchange
Ticker Symbol: HFC
A n n uA L M e e t i n g
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held
at 8:30 a.m. on May 16, 2012, at the Crescent Club,
200 Crescent Court, 17th floor, Dallas, Texas.
S e c F i L i n g S
A direct link to the filings of HollyFrontier Corporation
at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission website
is available on the HollyFrontier Corporation website at
www.hollyfrontier.com on the Investor Relations page.
S t o c k P e r F o r M A n c e
Set forth is a line graph comparing, for the period commencing January 1, 2007
and ending December 31, 2011, the annual percentage change in cumulative total
stockholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total stockholder return
of the S&P Composite 500 Stock Index and an industry peer group chosen by
the Company. The stock price performance depicted in the following graph is not
necessarily indicative of future price performance. The graph will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference in any filing by the Company under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange of 1934, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates such graph by reference.
HollyFrontier
S&P 500 index
Peer group
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
HollyFrontier
S&P 500 index
Peer group
2006
100
100
100
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
100
105
132
36
66
46
53
84
37
86
97
54
103
99
54
(1) The amounts shown assume that the value of the investment in HollyFrontier and
each index was $100 on January 1, 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested.
(2) The Peer Group consists of Alon USA Energy, Inc., CVR Energy, Inc (included from
10/23/07), Delek US Holdings, Inc., Sunoco Inc., Tesoro Corporation, Valero Energy
Corporation and Western Refining, Inc. CVR Energy, Inc. became public in 2007.
Edmonton Hardisty
Spokane
PADD IV
Billings
Boise
Mountain Home
Porta
Grand Forks
T
e
x
a
c
o
/
B
u
t
t
e
PADD II
Minneapolis
Burley
Casper
Guernsey
Sidney
Omaha
CHEYENNE
Express
Platte
Des Moines
Chicago
PADD I
WOODS CROSS
Salt Lake City
Denver
PADD V
Las Vegas
Cedar City
Bloomfield
Albuquerque
Moriarty
Phoenix
Tucson
NAVAJO
El Paso
Orla
J
a
y
h
a
w
k
Wichita
Kansas City
EL DORADO
Cushing
TULSA
Duncan
Wichita Falls
Abilene
Houston
PADD III
A Niche Pure-PlAy refiNer
PuRe Play
coMPetitive
RefineR
attRactive
MaRketS
gRowth
& caPital
iMPRoveMent
• Five refineries with combined processing capacity of over 440,000 BPSD
• High-complexity facilities with access to multiple sources of crude supply
– combined Nelson Complexity rating of over 12.0
• High degree of crude source flexibility
• All crude oil “WTI” price based
• Geographic: Rocky Mountains, Southwest and Mid-Continent Plains states
• Advantaged crude supply: High-growth Canadian, Bakken,
Permian, Niobrara
• Product mix: Balanced gasoline and diesel product slate plus high-value/
high-margin specialty lubricants
• Reinvested over $1 billion of cash flow generated in recent years into facilities
• CAPEX focused on both growth and feedstock flexibility to lower crude
and raw material costs
• Purchased Woods Cross, El Dorado and Tulsa Refineries (285,000 BPSD)
at industry lows on a per barrel basis
• Integrated Tulsa facilities in Fall 2011 for improved yields and lower
operating costs
StRong
financial
PeRfoRMance
• Strong track record of capital return to shareholders over the last 12 months
• Historical industry leading return on invested capital among peers
• Historical industry leading earnings per barrel among peers
• Low debt among peers and history of conservative financial management
heP
owneRShiP
• Stable cash flow quarterly from HEP through regular and incentive
distributions
• 11.1 million common units (NYSE:HEP) plus 100% of General Partner
(with Incentive IDRs)
hollyfrontier corporation
443,000 capacity
12.1 complexity
HollyFrontier Refineries
HEP Terminals
HollyFrontier Terminals
Third-party Terminals
Other HollyFrontier Assets
Pipelines
HEP pipelines
UNEV HollyFrontier
product pipeline
Third-party products
Third-party crude
HollyFrontier pipeline
1
D
L
O
F
E
G
N
I
H
E
G
N
I
H
Mid-continent
the Mid-continent Region comprises our tulsa and el dorado Refineries and has
a combined crude oil processing capacity of 260,000 BPSd.
SouthweSt
the Southwest Region consists of our
navajo Refinery and has a crude oil
processing capacity of 100,000 BPSd.
in addition, we manufacture and market
commodity and modified asphalt prod-
ucts throughout the Southwest Region.
el doR a do RefineRy
tulSa RefineRy
nava jo RefineRy
• Located in El Dorado, Kansas
• Located in Tulsa, Oklahoma
• Located in Artesia, New Mexico and
• 135,000 BPSD capacity and Nelson
• 125,000 BPSD capacity and Nelson
Complexity rating of 11.8
Complexity rating of 14.0
• Processes sour and heavy (Canadian)
crude oils into high-value light products
• Distributes to high-margin markets
in Colorado and Mid-Continent/
Plains states
• Processes predominantly sweet crude
oil with up to 10,000 barrels per day
(BPD) of heavy Canadian crudes
• Distributes to the Mid-Continent states
• Markets high-value specialty lubricants
throughout the U.S. and to Central and
South America
operated in conjunction with a refining
facility 65 miles east in Lovington,
New Mexico
• 100,000 BPSD capacity and Nelson
Complexity rating of 11.8
• Processes sour and heavy crude oils
into high-value light products
• Distributes to high-margin markets in
Arizona, New Mexico and West Texas
Crude and feedstock:
SouthweSt SaleS of RefineRy
PRoduced PRoductS
100,660 BPd
Product mix:
Crude and feedstock:
Crude and feedstock:
Product mix:
Product mix:
Mid-co ntinent SaleS of RefineRy PRoduced PRoductS
268,320 BPd
Crude and feedstock:
Crude and Feedstocks
n Sour crude oil 78%
n Sweet crude oil 2%
Product mix:
n Heavy sour crude oil 9%
n Other feedstocks
and blends 11%
Crude and Feedstocks
n Sour crude oil 6%
n Sweet crude oil 76%
n Heavy sour
crude oil 10%
n Other feedstocks
and blends 8%
Product Mix
n Gasolines 46%
n Diesel fuels 32%
n Jet fuels 7%
n Asphalt 4%
n Lubricants 4%
n Other 7%
Product Mix
n Gasolines 53%
n Diesel fuels 35%
n Asphalt 5%
n Other 7%
The above BPD and percentages represent activity for the period July 1, 2011 (date of merger) to December 31, 2011.
D
L
O
F
Rocky Mountain
the Rocky Mountain Region comprises our cheyenne and woods cross Refineries
and has a combined crude oil processing capacity of 83,000 BPSd. we also own
a 75% joint venture interest in the recently completed unev pipeline, a 400-mile
refined products pipeline that will serve refineries in the Rocky Mountain area.
ho lly eneRgy PaRtneRS
holly energy Partners owns and
operates substantially all of the refined
product pipeline and terminalling assets
that support our refining and marketing
operations in the Mid-continent, South-
west and Rocky Mountain Regions of the
united States.
che yenne RefineRy
*
woodS cRoSS RefineRy
ho lly eneRgy PaRtneRS
• Located in Cheyenne, Wyoming
• Located in Woods Cross, Utah
• 2,500 miles of crude oil and petroleum
• 52,000 BPSD capacity and Nelson
(near Salt Lake City)
product pipelines
Complexity rating of 8.9
• 31,000 BPSD capacity and Nelson
• 12 million barrels of refined product
• Processes sour and heavy Canadian
Complexity rating of 12.5
and crude oil storage
crude oils into high-value light products
• Processes regional sweet and
• Distributes to high-margin Eastern
Rockies and Plains states
advantaged waxy crude as well as
Canadian sour crude oils
• Distributes to high-margin markets
in Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Wyoming,
and eastern Washington
• 11 terminals and 10 rack facilities in
9 Western and Mid-Continent states
• 25% joint venture interest in SLC
Pipeline, LLC — a 95-mile crude oil
pipeline system that serves refineries
in the Salt Lake City area
Crude and feedstock:
Crude and feedstock:
Product mix:
Product mix:
Rocky Mountain SaleS of RefineRy PRoduced PRoductS
73,980 BPd
Crude and Feedstocks
n Sour crude oil 2%
n Sweet crude oil 48%
n Heavy sour
crude oil 31%
n Black wax crude oil 10%
n Other feedstocks
and blends 9%
Product Mix
n Gasolines 54%
n Diesel fuels 32%
n Asphalt 7%
n Other 7%
The above BPD and percentages represent activity for the period July 1, 2011 (date of merger) to December 31, 2011.
D
L
O
F
hollyfrontier corporation
443,000 capacity
12.1 complexity
HollyFrontier Refineries
HEP Terminals
HollyFrontier Terminals
Third-party Terminals
Other HollyFrontier Assets
Pipelines
HEP pipelines
UNEV HollyFrontier
product pipeline
Third-party products
Third-party crude
HollyFrontier pipeline
DeAr StockholDerS
2011 was a year of exceptional achievement at HollyFrontier. We completed our merger, generated record earnings, delivered
strong operating performance at our refineries and significantly increased dividends paid to stockholders.
HollyFrontier was created through the highly strategic and synergistic merger of Holly Corporation and Frontier Oil Corporation,
which was completed on July 1, 2011. The transaction combined two of the most profitable and highest return-on-capital refiners
in the independent refining sector, establishing HollyFrontier as a stronger and more geographically diversified refining company.
Today, with our outstanding and complementary assets in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain Regions, the
Company is well-positioned for continued growth and shareholder value creation.
we have set our sights on being “the premier u.S. petroleum refining, pipeline and terminal company.” this objective
spans a variety of important areas, including:
• operating our assets safely, reliably and in an environmentally responsible way
• Leveraging our existing assets to create value
• Providing our customers with superior products and service
• Seeking to grow our business in a way that builds long-term shareholder value while also generating near-term returns
In addition to completing our merger during 2011, we capitalized on the very attractive market opportunity that resulted from
depressed inland crude prices associated with higher oil production in the U.S. and Canada. Our record financial results in 2011
included total net income of $1,023 million, earnings per share of $6.42 and free cash flow per share of $6.05.
The Company’s outstanding financial performance reflects two fundamental attributes that differentiate HollyFrontier: First,
our focused investment in Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain refining capacity paid off as higher crude production
in these regions created advantaged pricing for local refiners. Second, because of our facility upgrade and expansion projects
and commitment to operational excellence, our refining system delivered very strong throughput and product yields through
many months of high-margin opportunity.
Following the merger, an initial key activity was to develop and articulate a business strategy that would help focus our attention
and resources. This process benefitted greatly from the experiences gained at the legacy companies, which both had lengthy
track records of managing through business cycles, investing capital in disciplined but productive manners and generating
solid returns for shareholders.
looking forward, we have a conservative bias, an opportunistic outlook and a business strategy that involves:
• Exploiting our geographic position relative to increasing crude supplies and niche product markets
• Investing in our refineries and logistics assets to further enhance our competitive position and improve our overall
refining margins
• Maintaining disciplined capital spending and emphasizing the return of capital to shareholders
• Creating even stronger operations by linking our refineries logistically and sharing best practices
• Partnering with Holly Energy Partners (our MLP affiliate) to create additional value by connecting our refineries,
crude supply points and product market opportunities
HollyFrontier’s capital structure is a differentiating strength, and at December 31, 2011 we were the sole U.S. independent
refiner with cash in excess of debt outstanding. This is due to two factors. First, we maintain a strong and liquid balance sheet
to provide flexibility to address industry cyclicality, volatile working capital needs and strategic opportunities. Second, we
participated in an outstanding margin environment during 2011 and generated substantial cash, most of which remained
on our balance sheet at year end.
2
HollyFrontier Corporation 2011 Annual Report
D
L
O
F
Matthew P. Clifton and Michael C. Jennings
Quantitatively (and including Frontier Oil free cash flow for Q1 and Q2), our operating cash flow for the year exceeded capital
expenditures by $1.3 billion. Our year-ending balance sheet reflected cash of $1.8 billion, and debt (excluding non-recourse
HEP debt) of $689 million. We also held 11.1 million limited partnership units of Holly Energy Partners, which closed the year
with a $53.78 value per unit, and our HEP General Partner interest, which received distributions of $16 million during 2011.
HollyFrontier is well positioned and is committed to returning value to shareholders, while investing in our business and managing
through the business cycles we encounter in the downstream petroleum sector. Distributions to stockholders during 2011 included
two special dividends and a 33% increase in our regular dividend rate. In addition, we repurchased 1.3 million shares and
affected a two-for-one split of HollyFrontier common stock. The Board of Directors has established a new policy for the combined
Company regarding the return of capital to shareholders, under which we plan to grow our regular dividends progressively
and pay special cash dividends as we deem appropriate based on available liquidity and other investment opportunities. We
will also repurchase shares opportunistically and to offset dilution from our stock-based compensation programs. We believe
this combination of tools, used in differing quantities as dictated by the business environment, will allow us to maximize shareholder
returns, both in the form of price appreciation and cash yield.
We are proud of HollyFrontier and all that we achieved in 2011. The headline event, from a corporate standpoint, was completion
of our merger. This transaction went far beyond a change of name and ticker symbol; it created a stronger company that faces
new and exciting opportunities as we work to rationalize, improve and grow.
In addition, we have taken a number of initiatives to improve and expand our operations. Our recently-announced expansion
of our Woods Cross Refinery and associated Utah Black Wax crude supply arrangement showcases the type of organic growth
we are successfully achieving. The Woods Cross project capitalizes on our existing capabilities and infrastructure while facili-
tating volume growth that will develop in parallel with Utah crude oil production, effectively displacing foreign imported crude
with cost effective domestic Utah crude oil. We believe opportunities like this will further bolster our competitive position,
grow our business and generate attractive cash returns.
Our UNEV pipeline, which connects the Wood Cross Refinery to the Las Vegas market, is now fully operational. We expect
the access afforded by this pipeline to offer an attractive outlet for current and expanding Woods Cross Refinery production
and other Rocky Mountain refiners at economic transportation costs, driving profits in years to come.
HollyFrontier’s outstanding operational performance and value creating potential are built on the dedication of the Company’s
talented employees. Their efforts have enabled HollyFrontier to maintain and improve our operations across our asset base
and to execute on our growth strategy. We extend our deepest appreciation and thanks to our employees for their service and
continued hard work.
We also extend heartfelt thanks to our stockholders for their investment and confidence in HollyFrontier Corporation, to our
trading partners for relationships that sustain our business, and to the communities that host our operations, enabling the
development of our Company and the careers of our people.
This is an exciting time for HollyFrontier, and we are optimistic about the Company’s future. We look forward to meeting and
exceeding our operational goals and executing on our business strategy to continue enhancing value for HollyFrontier stockholders.
Matthew P. clifton
Executive Chairman
Michael c. jennings
Chief Executive Officer
and President
3
fiNANciAl highlightS
Year ended december 31
Sales and other revenues
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
Net income attributable to HFC stockholders
Net income per common share attributable to HFC stockholders – diluted
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows used for capital expenditures
Total assets
HFC stockholders’ equity
Sales of refined products – BPD
Refinery production – BPD
Employees
2010
2011
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,322,929,000
192,363,000
103,964,000
0.97
283,255,000
213,232,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
15,439,528,000
1,641,695,000
1,023,397,000
6.42
1,338,391,000
374,241,000
3,701,475,000
$ 10,314,621,000
697,419,000
$
5,204,010,000
232,100
225,980
1,661
340,630
331,890
2,382
net income attributable
to hfc Stockholders
$ in millions
4
3
3
1
2
1
0
2
4
0
1
3
2
0
1
,
cash flows from
operating activities
$ in millions
3
2
4
5
5
1
2
1
2
3
8
2
8
3
3
1
,
Revenues
$ in millions
2
9
7
4
,
0
6
8
5
,
4
3
8
4
,
3
2
3
8
,
0
4
4
5
1
,
07
08
09
10
11
07
08
09
10
11
07
08
09
10
11
Refinery Production
BPD in thousands
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
6
2
2
2
3
3
hfc Stockholders’ equity
$ in millions
4
9
5
2
4
5
9
1
6
7
9
6
4
0
2
5
,
total assets
$ in millions
4
6
6
1
,
4
7
8
1
,
6
4
1
3
,
1
0
7
3
,
5
1
3
0
1
,
07
08
09
10
11
07
08
09
10
11
07
08
09
10
11
4
hollyfrontier corporation 2011 annual Report
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
X Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from
to
OR
Commission File Number 1-3876
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
2828 N. Harwood, Suite 1300, Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
75-1056913
(I.R.S Employer
Identification No.)
75201-1507
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (214) 871-3555
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value registered on the New York Stock Exchange.
Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15 (d) of the Act.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
Yes [X] No [ ]
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Yes [X] No [ ]
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
[ ]
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer [X]
Smaller reporting company [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]
Accelerated filer [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
On June 30, 2011 the aggregate market value of the Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $3.1 billion. (This is not to be deemed an admission that any person whose shares were not included in the computation of the
amount set forth in the preceding sentence necessarily is an “affiliate” of the registrant.)
208,236,478 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding on February 16, 2012.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 16, 2012, which proxy statement will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 2011, are incorporated by reference in Part III.
Item
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Forward-looking statements ............................................................................................................
Definitions ......................................................................................................................................
1 and 2. Business and properties ....................................................................................................
Risk factors .......................................................................................................................
Unresolved staff comments ..............................................................................................
Legal proceedings .............................................................................................................
Mine safety disclosures ....................................................................................................
1A.
1B.
3.
4.
PART II
5.
6.
7.
7A.
Market for Registrant’s common equity, related stockholder matters and issuer
purchases of equity securities ........................................................................................
Selected financial data ......................................................................................................
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations ......................................................................................................................
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ..............................................
Reconciliations to amounts reported under generally accepted accounting principles ...................
8.
9.
9A.
9B.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Financial statements and supplementary data ...................................................................
Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial
disclosure ......................................................................................................................
Controls and procedures ...................................................................................................
Other information .............................................................................................................
PART III
Directors, executive officers and corporate governance ...................................................
Executive compensation ...................................................................................................
Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related
stockholder matters .......................................................................................................
Certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence .......................
Principal accounting fees and services .............................................................................
PART IV
Page
3
4
6
23
35
35
38
39
40
41
61
61
64
106
106
106
106
106
106
107
107
15.
Exhibits, financial statement schedules ............................................................................
108
Signatures .......................................................................................................................................
109
Index to exhibits ..............................................................................................................................
111
-2-
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-K, including, but
not limited to, those under “Business and Properties” in Items 1 and 2, “Risk Factors” in Item 1A, “Legal
Proceedings” in Item 3 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” in Item 7, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s beliefs and
assumptions using currently available information and expectations as of the date hereof, are not guarantees of
future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that the expectations reflected
in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our expectations will prove to be
correct. Therefore, actual outcomes and results could materially differ from what is expressed, implied or forecast
in these statements. Any differences could be caused by a number of factors including, but not limited to:
•
risks and uncertainties with respect to the actions of actual or potential competitive suppliers of refined
petroleum products in our markets;
the demand for and supply of crude oil and refined products;
the spread between market prices for refined products and market prices for crude oil;
the possibility of constraints on the transportation of refined products;
the possibility of inefficiencies, curtailments or shutdowns in refinery operations or pipelines;
effects of governmental and environmental regulations and policies;
the availability and cost of our financing;
the effectiveness of our capital investments and marketing strategies;
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• our efficiency in carrying out construction projects;
• our ability to acquire refined product operations or pipeline and terminal operations on acceptable terms
and to integrate any existing or future acquired operations;
the possibility of terrorist attacks and the consequences of any such attacks;
•
• general economic conditions;
• our ability to realize fully or at all the anticipated benefits of our “merger of equals” with Frontier; and
• other financial, operational and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our Securities and
Exchange Commission filings.
Cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are set forth in this Form 10-K, including without limitation the forward-looking statements that are
referred to above. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other
cautionary statements set forth in this Form 10-K under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and in conjunction with the
discussion in this Form 10-K in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” All forward-looking statements included in this
Form 10-K and all subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date made and, other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
-3-
DEFINITIONS
Within this report, the following terms have these specific meanings:
“Alkylation” means the reaction of propylene or butylene (olefins) with isobutane to form an iso-paraffinic
gasoline (inverse of cracking).
“Aromatic oil” is long chain oil that is highly aromatic in nature that is used to manufacture tires and in the
production of asphalt.
“BPD” means the number of barrels per calendar day of crude oil or petroleum products.
“BPSD” means the number of barrels per stream day (barrels of capacity in a 24 hour period) of crude oil or
petroleum products.
“Biodiesel” means a clean alternative fuel produced from renewable biological resources.
“Black wax crude oil” is a low sulfur, low gravity crude oil produced in the Uintah Basin in Eastern Utah that
has certain characteristics that require specific facilities to transport, store and refine into transportation fuels.
“Catalytic reforming” means a refinery process which uses a precious metal (such as platinum) based catalyst
to convert low octane naphtha to high octane gasoline blendstock and hydrogen. The hydrogen produced from the
reforming process is used to desulfurize other refinery oils and is a primary source of hydrogen for the refinery.
“Cracking” means the process of breaking down larger, heavier and more complex hydrocarbon molecules into
simpler and lighter molecules.
“Crude distillation” means the process of distilling vapor from liquid crudes, usually by heating, and
condensing the vapor slightly above atmospheric pressure turning it back to liquid in order to purify, fractionate or
form the desired products.
“Delayed coker unit” is a refinery unit that removes carbon from the bottom cuts of crude oil to produce
unfinished light transportation fuels and petroleum coke.
“Ethanol” means a high octane gasoline blend stock that is used to make various grades of gasoline.
“FCC,” or fluid catalytic cracking, means a refinery process that breaks down large complex hydrocarbon
molecules into smaller more useful ones using a circulating bed of catalyst at relatively high temperatures.
“Hydrocracker” means a refinery unit that breaks down large complex hydrocarbon molecules into smaller
more useful ones using a fixed bed of catalyst at high pressure and temperature with hydrogen.
“Hydrodesulfurization” means to remove sulfur and nitrogen compounds from oil or gas in the presence of
hydrogen and a catalyst at relatively high temperatures.
“Hydrogen plant” means a refinery unit that converts natural gas and steam to high purity hydrogen, which is
then used in the hydrodesulfurization, hydrocracking and isomerization processes.
“HF alkylation,” or hydrofluoric alkylation, means a refinery process which combines isobutane and C3/C4
olefins using HF acid as a catalyst to make high octane gasoline blend stock.
“Isomerization” means a refinery process for rearranging the structure of C5/C6 molecules without changing
their size or chemical composition and is used to improve the octane of C5/C6 gasoline blendstocks.
“LPG” means liquid petroleum gases.
-4-
“Lubricant” or “lube” means a solvent neutral paraffinic product used in passenger and commercial vehicle
engine oils, specialty products for metal working or heat transfer and other industrial applications.
“MEK” means a lube process that separates waxy oil from non-waxy oils using methyl ethyl ketone as a
solvent.
“Natural gasoline” means a low octane gasoline blend stock that is purchased and used to blend with other
high octane stocks produced to make various grades of gasoline.
“PPM” means parts-per-million.
“Paraffinic oil” is a high paraffinic, high gravity oil produced by extracting aromatic oils and waxes from gas
oil and is used in producing high-grade lubricating oils.
“Refinery gross margin” means the difference between average net sales price and average product costs per
produced barrel of refined products sold. This does not include the associated depreciation and amortization costs.
“Reforming” means the process of converting gasoline type molecules into aromatic, higher octane gasoline
blend stocks while producing hydrogen in the process.
“Roofing flux” is produced from the bottom cut of crude oil and is the base oil used to make roofing shingles
for the housing industry.
“RFS2” or advanced renewable fuel standard is a regulatory mandate required by the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 that requires 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel to be blended into transportation fuels by
2022. New mandated blending requirements for this standard became effective July 1, 2010.
“ROSE,” or “Solvent deasphalter / residuum oil supercritical extraction,” means a refinery unit that uses a
light hydrocarbon like propane or butane to extract non-asphaltene heavy oils from asphalt or atmospheric reduced
crude. These deasphalted oils are then further converted to gasoline and diesel in the FCC process. The remaining
asphaltenes are either sold, blended to fuel oil or blended with other asphalt as a hardener.
“Scanfiner” is a refinery unit that removes sulfur from gasoline to produce low sulfur gasoline blendstock.
“Sour crude oil” means crude oil containing quantities of sulfur greater than 0.4 percent by weight, while
“sweet crude oil” means crude oil containing quantities of sulfur equal to or less than 0.4 percent by weight.
“Vacuum distillation” means the process of distilling vapor from liquid crudes, usually by heating, and
condensing the vapor below atmospheric pressure turning it back to a liquid in order to purify, fractionate or form
the desired products.
-5-
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties
COMPANY OVERVIEW
References herein to HollyFrontier Corporation (“HollyFrontier”) include HollyFrontier and its consolidated
subsidiaries. In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) “Plain English” guidelines,
this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been written in the first person. In this document, the words “we,” “our,”
“ours” and “us” refer only to HollyFrontier and its consolidated subsidiaries or to HollyFrontier or an individual
subsidiary and not to any other person with certain exceptions. Generally, the words “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us”
include Holly Energy Partners (“HEP”) and its subsidiaries as consolidated subsidiaries of HollyFrontier, unless
when used in disclosures of transactions or obligations between HEP and HollyFrontier or its other subsidiaries.
This document contains certain disclosures of agreements that are specific to HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries
and do not necessarily represent obligations of HollyFrontier. When used in descriptions of agreements and
transactions, “HEP” refers to HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We merged with Frontier Oil Corporation (“Frontier”) effective July 1, 2011. Concurrent with the merger, we
changed our name from Holly Corporation (“Holly”) to HollyFrontier and changed the ticker symbol for our
common stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange to “HFC.” Accordingly, this document includes Frontier,
its consolidated subsidiaries and the operations of the merged Frontier businesses effective July 1, 2011, but not
prior to this date.
We are principally an independent petroleum refiner that produces high value light products such as gasoline, diesel
fuel, jet fuel, specialty lubricant products, and specialty and modified asphalt. We were incorporated in Delaware in
1947 and maintain our principal corporate offices at 2828 N. Harwood, Suite 1300, Dallas, Texas 75201-1507. Our
telephone number is 214-871-3555 and our internet website address is www.hollyfrontier.com. The information
contained on our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A print copy of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K will be provided without charge upon written request to the Vice President, Investor Relations
at the above address. A direct link to our filings at the SEC website is available on our website on the Investors
page. Also available on our website are copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Audit Committee Charter,
Compensation Committee Charter, Nominating / Corporate Governance Committee Charter, Environmental, Health,
Safety, and Public Policy Committee Charter and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, all of which will be
provided without charge upon written request to the Vice President, Investor Relations at the above address. Our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of our officers, employees and directors, including our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our common stock is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HFC.”
On February 21, 2011, we entered into a merger agreement providing for a “merger of equals” business combination
between us and Frontier for purposes of creating a more diversified company having a broader geographic sales
footprint, stronger financial position and to create a more efficient corporate overhead structure, while also realizing
synergies and promoting accretion to earnings per share. The legacy Frontier business operations consist of crude oil
refining and the wholesale marketing of refined petroleum products. Frontier operated refineries in Cheyenne,
Wyoming (the “Cheyenne Refinery”) and El Dorado, Kansas (the “El Dorado Refinery”) that serve markets in the
Rocky Mountain and Plains States regions of the United States. The combined annual average crude oil capacity of
these refineries is approximately 187,000 barrels per day. On July 1, 2011, North Acquisition, Inc., a direct wholly-
owned subsidiary of Holly, merged with and into Frontier, with Frontier surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Holly. Subsequent to the merger and following approval by HollyFrontier’s post-closing board of directors, Frontier
merged with and into HollyFrontier, and HollyFrontier continued as the surviving corporation. The aggregate equity
consideration paid in connection with the merger was $3.7 billion.
On June 1, 2009, we acquired an 85,000 BPSD refinery located in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the “Tulsa West facility”) from
an affiliate of Sunoco, Inc. (“Sunoco”) for $157.8 million. On October 20, 2009, we sold a portion of the acquired
crude oil petroleum storage tanks and certain refining-related crude oil receiving pipeline facilities to an affiliate of
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“Plains”) for $40 million.
-6-
On December 1, 2009, we acquired a 75,000 BPSD refinery from an affiliate of Sinclair Oil Company (“Sinclair”)
also located in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the “Tulsa East facility”) for $183.3 million. We have integrated certain
operations of the Tulsa West and East facilities (collectively, the “Tulsa Refineries”). This resulted in the Tulsa
Refineries having an integrated crude processing rate of 125,000 BPSD.
On February 29, 2008, we sold certain assets to HEP consisting of crude oil pipelines, tankage and terminal facilities
supporting our Navajo and Woods Cross Refineries. HEP is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) as defined under U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Under GAAP, HEP’s acquisition of these assets qualified as a
reconsideration event whereby we reassessed our beneficial interest in HEP. Following this transaction, we
determined that our beneficial interest in HEP exceeded 50%. Therefore, we reconsolidated HEP effective March 1,
2008. Intercompany transactions with HEP are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements.
HEP made a number of acquisitions in 2009 through 2011. Information on these acquisitions can be found under
the “Holly Energy Partners, L.P.” section provided later in this discussion of Items 1 and 2, “Business and
Properties.”
As of December 31, 2011, we:
•
•
•
•
•
owned and operated the El Dorado Refinery located in El Dorado, Kansas, two refinery facilities located in
Tulsa, Oklahoma (collectively, the “Tulsa Refineries”), a refinery in Artesia, New Mexico that is operated
in conjunction with crude oil distillation and vacuum distillation and other facilities situated 65 miles away
in Lovington, New Mexico (collectively, the “Navajo Refinery”), a refinery located in Cheyenne,
Wyoming (“the Cheyenne Refinery”) and a refinery in Woods Cross, Utah (the “Woods Cross Refinery”);
owned and operated NK Asphalt Partners (“NK Asphalt”) which operates various asphalt terminals in
Arizona and New Mexico;
owned a 75% interest in a 12-inch refined products pipeline from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas,
Nevada, together with terminal facilities in the Cedar City, Utah and North Las Vegas areas (the “UNEV
Pipeline”);
owned Ethanol Management Company (“EMC”), a products terminal and blending facility near Denver,
Colorado and a 50% interest in Sabine Biofuels II, LLC (“Sabine Biofuels”), a development stage biodiesel
production facility located in Port Arthur, Texas; and
owned a 42% interest in HEP which includes our 2% general partner interest. HEP owns and operates
logistic assets consisting of petroleum product and crude oil pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading
rack facilities that principally support our refining and marketing operations in the Mid-Continent,
Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States and Alon USA, Inc.’s (“Alon”) refinery in Big
Spring, Texas. Additionally, HEP owns a 25% interest in SLC Pipeline LLC (“SLC Pipeline”), a 95-mile
intrastate pipeline system that serves refineries in the Salt Lake City area.
Our operations are currently organized into two reportable segments, Refining and HEP. The Refining segment
includes the operations of our El Dorado, Tulsa, Navajo, Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries and NK Asphalt.
The HEP segment involves all of the operations of HEP effective March 1, 2008 (date of reconsolidation).
REFINERY OPERATIONS
Our refinery operations serve the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States. We
own and operate five complex refineries having an aggregate crude capacity of 443,000 barrels per day. Each of our
refineries has the complexity to convert discounted, heavy and sour crude oils into a high percentage of gasoline,
diesel and other high-value refined products. For 2011, gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and specialty lubricants
(excluding volumes purchased for resale) represented 48%, 32%, 5% and 3%, respectively, of our total refinery
sales volumes.
The following tables below and elsewhere in this discussion of our refinery operations set forth information,
including non-GAAP performance measures, about our refinery operations. The cost of products and refinery gross
margin do not include the effect of depreciation and amortization. Reconciliations to amounts reported under GAAP
are provided under “Reconciliations to Amounts Reported Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”
following Item 7A of Part II of this Form 10-K.
-7-
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011(10)
2009(11)
Consolidated
Crude charge (BPD) (1) ....................................................................................
Refinery throughput (BPD) (2) .........................................................................
Refinery production (BPD) (3) .........................................................................
Sales of produced refined products (BPD) ......................................................
Sales of refined products (BPD) (4) ..................................................................
315,000
340,200
331,890
332,720
340,630
221,440
234,910
225,980
228,140
232,100
142,430
154,940
151,420
151,580
155,820
Refinery utilization (5) ......................................................................................
89.9%
86.5%
78.9%
Average per produced barrel (6)
Net sales ......................................................................................................
Cost of products (7) ......................................................................................
Refinery gross margin .................................................................................
Refinery operating expenses (8) ...................................................................
Net operating margin ...................................................................................
$ 118.82
98.18
20.64
5.36
15.28
$
Refinery operating expenses per throughput barrel (9) .....................................
$
5.24
Feedstocks:
Sour crude oil ..............................................................................................
Sweet crude oil ............................................................................................
Black wax crude oil .....................................................................................
Heavy sour crude oil ....................................................................................
Other feedstocks and blends ........................................................................
Total ............................................................................................................
23%
56%
2%
12%
7%
100%
$
$
$
91.06
82.27
8.79
5.08
3.71
4.94
35%
53%
3%
4%
5%
100%
$
$
$
74.06
66.85
7.21
5.24
1.97
5.12
49%
40%
5%
-%
6%
100%
(1) Crude charge represents the barrels per day of crude oil processed at our refineries.
(2) Refinery throughput represents the barrels per day of crude and other refinery feedstocks input to the crude units and other
conversion units at our refineries.
(3) Refinery production represents the barrels per day of refined products yielded from processing crude and other refinery
feedstocks through the crude units and other conversion units at our refineries.
Includes refined products purchased for resale.
(4)
(5) Represents crude charge divided by total crude capacity (BPSD). Our consolidated crude capacity was increased by 15,000
BPSD effective April 1, 2009 (our Navajo Refinery expansion), 85,000 BPSD effective June 1, 2009 (our Tulsa West facility
acquisition) and 40,000 BPSD effective December 1, 2009 (our Tulsa East facility acquisition), increasing our consolidated
crude capacity to 256,000 BPSD. As a result of our merger effective July 1, 2011 our consolidated crude capacity increased
from 256,000 BPSD to 443,000 BPSD.
(6) Represents average per barrel amount for produced refined products sold, which is a non-GAAP measure. Reconciliations to
amounts reported under GAAP are provided under “Reconciliations to Amounts Reported Under Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” following Item 7A of Part II of this Form 10-K.
(7) Transportation, terminal and refinery storage costs billed from HEP are included in cost of products.
(8) Represents operating expenses of our refineries, exclusive of depreciation and amortization.
(9) Represents refinery operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, divided by refinery throughput.
(10) We merged with Frontier effective July 1, 2011. Refining operating data for the year ended December 31, 2011 include crude
oil processed and products yielded from the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries for the period from July 1, 2011 through
December 31, 2011 only, averaged over the 365 days in the year ended December 31, 2011.
(11) The amounts reported for the Mid-Continent refineries for the year ended December 31, 2009 include crude oil processed and
products yielded from the Tulsa Refineries for the period from June 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 only, averaged over
the 365 days for the year ended.
-8-
Principal Products and Customers
Set forth below is information regarding our principal products.
Consolidated
Sales of produced refined products:
Gasolines .................................................................................................
Diesel fuels ..............................................................................................
Jet fuels ....................................................................................................
Asphalt ....................................................................................................
Lubricants ................................................................................................
Fuel oil, gas oil/intermediates, LPG and other ........................................
Total ........................................................................................................
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2011
48%
32%
5%
4%
3%
8%
100%
49%
31%
5%
3%
5%
7%
100%
51%
31%
4%
2%
4%
8%
100%
Light products are shipped by product pipelines or are made available at various points by exchanges with other
parties and are made available to customers through truck loading facilities at the refinery and at terminals.
We have several significant customers, of which two accounted for more than 10% of our business in 2011. For the
year ended December 31, 2011, Sinclair accounted for $2,035.1 million, or 13%, of our revenues and Shell Oil
accounted for $1,540.6 million, or 10%, of our revenues. Our principal customers for gasoline include other
refiners, convenience store chains, independent marketers, and retailers. Diesel fuel is sold to other refiners, truck
stop chains, wholesalers, and railroads. Jet fuel is sold for military and commercial airline use. Specialty lubricant
products are sold in both commercial and specialty markets. LPG’s are sold to LPG wholesalers and LPG retailers.
We produce and purchase asphalt products that are sold to governmental entities, paving contractors or
manufacturers. Asphalt is also blended into fuel oil and is either sold locally or is shipped to the Gulf Coast.
Mid-Continent Region (Tulsa and El Dorado Refineries)
Facilities
On June 1, 2009, we acquired the Tulsa West facility, an 85,000 BPSD refinery in Tulsa, Oklahoma from Sunoco.
On December 1, 2009, we acquired the Tulsa East facility, a 75,000 BSPD refinery that is also located in Tulsa,
Oklahoma from Sinclair. We have integrated certain refining processes between our Tulsa West and East facilities.
In September 2011, HEP completed the Tulsa interconnecting pipeline project which facilitated a combined crude
processing rate of 125,000 BPSD. On July 1, 2011, the merger with Frontier added the El Dorado Refinery with a
135,000 BSPD capacity. The El Dorado Refinery is a high-complexity coking refinery with the ability to process
significant volumes of heavy and sour crudes. For 2011, gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and specialty lubricants
(excluding volumes purchased for resale) represented 44%, 32%, 7% and 6%, respectively, of our Mid-Continent
sales volumes.
The following table sets forth information about our Mid-Continent region operations, including non-GAAP
performance measures.
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009 (11)
2011(10)
Mid-Continent Region (Tulsa and El Dorado Refineries)
Crude charge (BPD) (1) ....................................................................................
Refinery throughput (BPD) (2) .........................................................................
Refinery production (BPD) (3) ........................................................................
Sales of produced refined products (BPD) ......................................................
Sales of refined products (BPD) (4) ..................................................................
183,070
194,310
188,760
188,020
190,340
111,670
113,100
106,910
107,780
108,330
39,370
39,520
38,910
37,570
37,700
Refinery utilization (5) ......................................................................................
94.8%
89.3%
74.0%
-9-
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009 (11)
2011(10)
Average per produced barrel (6)
Net sales .....................................................................................................
Cost of products (7) .....................................................................................
Refinery gross margin ................................................................................
Refinery operating expenses (8) ..................................................................
Net operating margin .................................................................................
$ 119.51
99.92
19.59
5.04
$ 14.55
$ 90.84
83.29
7.55
4.94
$ 2.61
$ 78.89
74.56
4.33
5.25
(0.92)
$
Refinery operating expenses per throughput barrel (9) .....................................
$
4.88
$
4.71
$
4.99
Feedstocks:
Heavy sour crude oil ..................................................................................
Sweet crude oil ..........................................................................................
Sour crude oil .............................................................................................
Other feedstocks and blends ......................................................................
Total ...........................................................................................................
8%
82%
4%
6%
100%
3%
92%
5%
-%
100%
-%
100%
-%
-%
100%
Footnote references are provided under our Consolidated Refinery Operating Data table on page 8.
The El Dorado Refinery is located on 1,100 acres south of El Dorado, Kansas and is a fully integrated refinery. The
principal process units at the El Dorado Refinery consist of crude and vacuum distillation; hydrodesulfurization of
naphtha, kerosene, diesel, and gas oil streams; isomerization; catalytic reforming; aromatics recovery; catalytic
cracking; alkylation; delayed coking; hydrogen production; and sulfur recovery. Refining operations began at the
site in 1917 and the operating units now present include both newly constructed units and older units that have been
upgraded over the years. Supporting infrastructure includes maintenance shops, warehouses, office buildings, a
laboratory, utility facilities, and a wastewater plant (“Supporting Infrastructure”) and logistics assets owned by HEP,
which includes approximately 3.7 million barrels of tankage, a truck sales terminal, and a propane terminal. The
facility typically processes approximately 135,000 BPSD of crude oil with the capability to handle a significant
volume of heavy sour crudes.
The Tulsa West facility is located on a 750-acre site in Tulsa, Oklahoma situated along the Arkansas River. The
principal process units at the Tulsa West facility consist of crude distillation (with light ends recovery), naphtha
hydrodesulfurization, catalytic reforming, propane de-asphalting, lubes extraction, MEK dewaxing, delayed coker
and butane splitter units. Most of the operating units at the facility currently in service were built in the late 1950s
and early 1960s. The refinery was reconfigured to emphasize specialty lubricant production in the early 1990s.
Tulsa West facility’s Supporting Infrastructure includes approximately 3.2 million barrels of feedstock and product
tankage, of which 0.4 million barrels of tankage is owned by Plains, and an additional 1.2 million barrels of tank
capacity is currently out of service but could be made available for future use.
The Tulsa East facility is located on a 466-acre site also in Tulsa, Oklahoma situated along the Arkansas River. The
principal process units at the Tulsa East facility consist of crude distillation, naphtha hydrodesulfurization, FCC,
isomerization, catalytic reforming, alkylation, scanfiner, diesel hydrodesulfurization and sulfur units. The Tulsa
East facility’s Supporting Infrastructure includes approximately 3.75 million barrels of tankage capacity on the
refinery’s premises, of which approximately 3.4 million barrels of tankage is owned by HEP.
In 2011, we integrated certain Tulsa refining operations and through this process now have a highly complex
refining operation with a combined crude processing rate of approximately 125,000 BPSD.
Markets and Competition
The primary markets for the El Dorado Refinery’s refined products are Colorado and the Plains States, which
include the Kansas City metropolitan area. The gasoline, diesel and jet fuel produced by the El Dorado Refinery are
primarily shipped via pipeline to terminals for distribution by truck or rail. We ship product via the NuStar Pipeline
Operating Partnership L.P. Pipeline to the northern Plains States, via the Magellan Pipeline Company, L.P.
(“Magellan”) mountain pipeline to Denver, Colorado, and on the Magellan mid-continent pipeline to the Plains
States.
-10-
The El Dorado Refinery faces competition from other Plains States and mid-continent refiners, but the principal
competitors for the El Dorado Refinery are Gulf Coast refiners. Although our Gulf Coast competitors typically have
lower production costs because of economies of scale, we believe that our competitors’ higher refined product
transportation costs allow our El Dorado Refinery to compete effectively in the Plains States and Rocky Mountain
region with the Gulf Coast refineries.
For the period July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, sales to Shell represented approximately 50% of the El Dorado
Refinery’s total sales and 10% of our total consolidated sales. We have an offtake agreement with Shell Oil
Products US (“Shell”) under which Shell purchases gasoline and diesel production of the El Dorado Refinery at
market-based prices through December 2014. Shell also has agreed to purchase all jet fuel production until the end
of the product offtake agreement. In aggregate during 2011, we retained and marketed 60,000 bpd of the refinery’s
gasoline and diesel production while the remaining production was sold to Shell. We market gasoline and diesel in
the same markets where Shell sells the refinery’s products, primarily in Denver and throughout the Plains States.
Upon expiration of the offtake agreement, we intend to sell the gasoline and diesel produced by the El Dorado
Refinery in the same general markets served by Shell.
The Tulsa Refineries primarily serve the Mid-Continent region of the United States. Distillates and gasolines are
primarily delivered from the Tulsa Refineries to market via two pipelines owned and operated by Magellan. These
pipelines connect the refinery to distribution channels throughout Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois,
Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska and Arkansas. Additionally, HEP’s on-site truck and rail racks facilitate access to local
refined product markets.
In conjunction with our acquisition of the Tulsa East facility, we entered a five-year offtake agreement through 2014
with an affiliate of Sinclair whereby Sinclair agreed to purchase 45,000 to 50,000 BPD of gasoline and distillate
products at market prices from us to supply its branded and unbranded marketing network throughout the Midwest.
Upon expiration, the offtake agreement can be renewed by Sinclair for an additional five-year term. For the year
ended December 31, 2011, sales to Sinclair represented approximately 40% of the Tulsa Refineries total sales and
13% of our total consolidated sales.
The Tulsa Refineries’ principal customers for conventional gasoline include Sinclair, other refiners, convenience
store chains, independent marketers and retailers. Sinclair and railroads are the primary diesel customers. Jet fuel is
sold primarily for commercial use. The refinery’s asphalt and roofing flux products are sold via truck or railcar
directly from the refineries or to customers throughout the Mid-Continent region primarily to paving contractors and
manufacturers of roofing products.
Our Tulsa West facility also produces specialty lubricant products sold in both commercial and specialty markets
throughout the United States and to customers with operations in Central America and South America. The
specialty lubricant products are high value products that provide a significantly higher margin contribution to the
refinery. Base oil customers include blender-compounders who prepare the various finished lubricant and grease
products sold to end users. Agricultural oils, primarily formulated as supplemental carriers for herbicides, are sold
to product formulators. Process oil customers include rubber and chemical industry customers. Specialty waxes are
sold primarily to packaging customers as coating material for paper and cardboard, and to non-packaging customers
in the construction materials, adhesive and candle-making markets. Our production represents approximately 6% of
paraffinic oil capacity and 9% of wax production capacity in the United States market and is one of four refineries of
specialty aromatic oils in North America.
-11-
Principal Products
Set forth below is information regarding the principal products produced at our El Dorado and Tulsa Refineries:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Mid-Continent Region (El Dorado and Tulsa Refineries)
Sales of produced refined products:
Gasolines ........................................................................................................
Diesel fuels .....................................................................................................
Jet fuels ...........................................................................................................
Lubricants .......................................................................................................
Gas oil / intermediates ....................................................................................
Asphalt ...........................................................................................................
LPG and other ................................................................................................
Total ...............................................................................................................
44%
32%
7%
6%
3%
4%
4%
100%
38%
31%
8%
11%
4%
5%
3%
100%
26%
29%
10%
16%
17%
-%
2%
100%
Crude Oil and Feedstock Supplies
The El Dorado Refinery is located about 125 miles, and the Tulsa Refineries are located approximately 50 miles
from Cushing, Oklahoma, a significant crude oil pipeline trading and storage hub. Local pipelines provide direct
access to regional Oklahoma crude production as well as access to United States onshore, Gulf of Mexico, Canadian
and other foreign crudes. The proximity of the refineries to the Cushing pipeline and storage hub provides the
flexibility to optimize their crude slate with a wide variety of crude oil supply options.
Both our Mid-Continent Refineries are connected via pipeline to Cushing, Oklahoma. In addition, we have a
transportation services agreement to transport up to 38,000 bpd of crude oil on the Spearhead Pipeline from
Flanagan, Illinois to Cushing, Oklahoma, enabling us to transport Canadian crude oil to Cushing for subsequent
shipment to either of our Mid-Continent Refineries or to our Navajo Refinery. The initial term of this agreement
expires in 2016. We have the right to extend the agreement for an additional ten years and to increase the volume
transported under a preferential tariff to 50,000 bpd.
Southwest Region (Navajo Refinery)
Facilities
The Navajo Refinery has a crude oil capacity of 100,000 BPSD and has the ability to process sour crude oils into
high value light products such as gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel. For 2011, gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel
(excluding volumes purchased for resale) represented 52%, 34% and 1%, respectively, of our Southwest sales
volumes.
The following table sets forth information about our Southwest region operations, including non-GAAP
performance measures.
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011(10)
2009
Southwest Region (Navajo Refinery)
Crude charge (BPD) (1) ....................................................................................
Refinery throughput (BPD) (2) .........................................................................
Refinery production (BPD) (3) ........................................................................
Sales of produced refined products (BPD) ......................................................
Sales of refined products (BPD) (4) ..................................................................
Refinery utilization (5) ......................................................................................
Average per produced barrel (6)
Net sales ......................................................................................................
Cost of products (7) ......................................................................................
Refinery gross margin .................................................................................
Refinery operating expenses (8) ....................................................................
Net operating margin ...................................................................................
83,700
93,260
91,810
93,950
98,540
83.7%
83,900
94,270
92,050
92,550
95,790
83.9%
78,160
88,900
86,760
87,140
90,870
81.2%
$ 118.76
98.40
20.36
5.44
14.92
$
$
$
90.37
83.12
7.25
4.95
2.30
$
$
73.15
65.95
7.20
4.81
2.39
-12-
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011(10)
2009
Refinery operating expenses per throughput barrel (9) .....................................
$
5.48
$
4.86
$
4.71
Feedstocks:
Sour crude oil...............................................................................................
Sweet crude oil ............................................................................................
Heavy sour crude oil ....................................................................................
Other feedstocks and blends ........................................................................
Total .............................................................................................................
75%
3%
11%
11%
100%
81%
5%
4%
10%
100%
85%
6%
-%
9%
100%
Footnote references are provided under our Consolidated Refinery Operating Data table on page 8.
The Navajo Refinery’s Artesia, New Mexico facility is located on a 561-acre site and is a fully integrated refinery
with crude distillation, vacuum distillation, FCC, ROSE (solvent deasphalter), HF alkylation, catalytic reforming,
hydrodesulfurization, mild hydrocracking, isomerization, sulfur recovery and product blending units. The operating
units at the Artesia facility include newly constructed units, older units that have been relocated from other facilities
and upgraded and re-erected in Artesia, and units that have been operating as part of the Artesia facility (with
periodic major maintenance) for many years, in some very limited cases since before 1970. Supporting
Infrastructure includes approximately 2 million barrels of feedstock and product tankage, of which 0.2 million
barrels of tankage are owned by HEP.
The Artesia facility is operated in conjunction with a refining facility located in Lovington, New Mexico,
approximately 65 miles east of Artesia. The principal equipment at the Lovington facility consists of a crude
distillation unit and associated vacuum distillation units that were constructed after 1970. Supporting Infrastructure
includes 1.1 million barrels of feedstock and product tankage of which 0.2 million barrels of tankage are owned by
HEP. The Lovington facility processes crude oil into intermediate products that are transported to Artesia by means
of three intermediate pipelines owned by HEP. These products are then upgraded into finished products at the
Artesia facility. The combined crude oil capacity of the Navajo Refinery facilities is 100,000 BPSD and it typically
processes or blends an additional 10,000 BPSD of natural gasoline, butane, gas oil and naphtha.
Markets and Competition
The Navajo Refinery primarily serves the southwestern United States market, which has historically experienced a
high growth rate, including the metropolitan areas of El Paso, Texas; Albuquerque, Moriarty and Bloomfield, New
Mexico; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; and portions of northern Mexico. Our products are shipped through HEP’s
pipelines from Artesia, New Mexico to El Paso, Texas and from El Paso to Albuquerque and to Mexico via products
pipeline systems owned by Plains and from El Paso to Tucson and Phoenix via a products pipeline system owned by
Kinder Morgan’s subsidiary, SFPP, L.P. (“SFPP”). In addition, the Navajo Refinery transports petroleum products
to markets in northwest New Mexico and to Moriarty, New Mexico, near Albuquerque, via HEP’s pipelines running
from Artesia to San Juan County, New Mexico. We have refined product storage through our pipelines and
terminals agreement with HEP at terminals in El Paso, Texas; Tucson, Arizona; and Artesia, Moriarty and
Bloomfield, New Mexico.
El Paso Market
The El Paso market for refined products is currently supplied by a number of area and gulf coast refiners and
pipelines. Area refiners include Navajo, WRB Refining, LLC (“WRB”) (a joint venture between ConocoPhillips
and EnCana Corp.), Valero, Alon (“Alon”), and Western Refining. Pipelines serving this market are owned by
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. (“Magellan”), NuStar Energy L.P. and HEP. Refined products from the Gulf
Coast are transported via Magellan pipelines, including Magellan’s Longhorn Pipeline acquired in 2009.
Arizona Market
The Arizona market for refined products is currently supplied by a number of refiners via pipelines and trucks.
Refiners include companies located in west Texas, eastern New Mexico, northern New Mexico, the Gulf Coast and
the West Coast. Magellan’s Longhorn Pipeline delivers refined products utilizing a direct route from the Texas Gulf
Coast to El Paso and, through interconnections with third-party common carrier pipelines, into the Arizona market.
-13-
New Mexico Markets
The Artesia, Albuquerque, Moriarty and Bloomfield markets are supplied by a number of refiners via pipelines and
trucks. Refiners include Navajo, Valero, Western Refining, Alon and WRB.
We use a common carrier pipeline out of El Paso to serve the Albuquerque market. In addition, HEP leases from
Mid-America Pipeline Company, L.L.C., a pipeline between White Lakes, New Mexico and the Albuquerque
vicinity and Bloomfield, New Mexico. The lease agreement currently runs through 2017, and HEP has options to
renew for two ten-year periods. HEP owns and operates a 12-inch pipeline from the Navajo Refinery to the leased
pipeline as well as terminalling facilities in Bloomfield, New Mexico, which is located in the northwest corner of
New Mexico, and in Moriarty, which is 40 miles east of Albuquerque. These facilities permit us to ship light
products to the Albuquerque and Santa Fe, New Mexico areas, which have historically experienced high growth
rates. If needed, additional pump stations could further increase the pipeline’s capabilities.
Principal Products
Set forth below is information regarding the principal products produced at our Navajo Refinery:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Southwest Region (Navajo Refinery)
Sales of produced refined products:
Gasolines .....................................................................................................
Diesel fuels ..................................................................................................
Jet fuels ........................................................................................................
Fuel oil .........................................................................................................
Asphalt .........................................................................................................
LPG and other ..............................................................................................
Total .............................................................................................................
52%
34%
1%
6%
4%
3%
100%
57%
32%
3%
4%
2%
2%
100%
58%
32%
2%
3%
3%
2%
100%
Crude Oil and Feedstock Supplies
The Navajo Refinery is situated near the Permian Basin, an area that has historically and continues to have abundant
supplies of crude oil available both for regional users and for export to other areas. We purchase crude oil from
independent producers in southeastern New Mexico and west Texas as well as from major oil companies. The crude
oil is gathered through HEP’s pipelines, our tank trucks and through third-party crude oil pipeline systems for
delivery to the Navajo Refinery.
The Navajo Refinery also has access to a wide variety of crude oils available at Cushing, Oklahoma via HEP’s
Roadrunner Pipeline that connects to Centurion Pipeline L.P. and Spearhead Pipeline at Cushing Oklahoma. In
2010, the Navajo Refinery began processing heavy sour crude oil transported from Cushing through these pipelines.
We also purchase volumes of isobutane, natural gasoline and other feedstocks to supply the Navajo Refinery from
sources in Texas and the Mid-Continent area that are delivered to our region on a common carrier pipeline owned by
Enterprise Products, L.P. Ultimately all volumes of these products are shipped to the Artesia refining facilities on
HEP’s intermediate pipelines running from Lovington to Artesia. From time to time, we purchase gas oil, naphtha
and light cycle oil from other oil companies for use as feedstock.
Rocky Mountain Region (Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries)
Facilities
The Cheyenne Refinery has a crude oil capacity of 52,000 BPSD and the Woods Cross Refinery has a crude oil
capacity of 31,000 BPSD. The Cheyenne Refinery processes heavy Canadian crudes as well as local sweet crudes
such as that produced from the Bakken shale and similar resources. The Woods Cross Refinery processes regional
sweet and black wax crude as well as Canadian sour crude oils into high value light products. For 2011, gasoline,
diesel fuel and jet fuel (excluding volumes purchased for resale) represented 56%, 31% and 1%, respectively, of our
Rocky Mountain sales volumes.
-14-
The following table sets forth information about the Rocky Mountain region operations, including non-GAAP
performance.
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011(10)
2009
Rocky Mountain Region (Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries)
Crude charge (BPD) (1) ....................................................................................
Refinery throughput (BPD) (2) .........................................................................
Refinery production (BPD) (3) ........................................................................
Sales of produced refined products (BPD) ......................................................
Sales of refined products (BPD) (4) ..................................................................
48,230
52,630
51,320
50,750
51,750
25,870
27,540
27,020
27,810
27,980
24,900
26,520
25,750
26,870
27,250
Refinery utilization (5) ......................................................................................
84.3%
83.5%
80.3%
Average per produced barrel (6)
Net sales .....................................................................................................
Cost of products (7) .....................................................................................
Refinery gross margin ................................................................................
Refinery operating expenses (8) ..................................................................
Net operating margin .................................................................................
$ 116.37
91.33
25.04
6.41
$ 18.63
$ 94.26
75.54
18.72
6.09
$ 12.63
$ 70.25
58.98
11.27
6.60
4.67
$
Refinery operating expenses per throughput barrel (9) .....................................
$
6.18
$
6.15
$
6.69
Feedstocks:
Heavy sour crude oil ..................................................................................
Sweet crude oil ..........................................................................................
Sour crude oil .............................................................................................
Black wax crude oil ...................................................................................
Other feedstocks and blends ......................................................................
Total ...........................................................................................................
24%
52%
1%
15%
8%
100%
6%
59%
-%
30%
5%
100%
5%
62%
-%
28%
5%
100%
Footnote references are provided under our Consolidated Refinery Operating Data table on page 8.
The Cheyenne Refinery facility is located on a 255- acre site and is a fully integrated refinery with crude distillation,
vacuum distillation, coking, FCCU, HF alkylation, catalytic reforming, hydrodesulfurization of naphtha and
distillates, butane isomerization, hydrogen production, sulfur recovery and product blending units. The operating
units at the Cheyenne Refinery include both newly constructed units and older units that have been upgraded over
the years. Supporting Infrastructure includes approximately 1.6 million barrels of feedstock and product tankage, of
which 1.5 million barrels of tankage are owned by HEP.
The Woods Cross Refinery facility is located on a 200-acre site and is a fully integrated refinery with crude
distillation, solvent deasphalter, FCC, HF alkylation, catalytic reforming, hydrodesulfurization, isomerization, sulfur
recovery and product blending units. The operating units at the Woods Cross Refinery include newly constructed
units, older units that have been relocated from other facilities, upgraded and re-erected in Woods Cross, and units
that have been operating as part of the Woods Cross facility (with periodic major maintenance) for many years, in
some very limited cases since before 1950. Supporting Infrastructure includes approximately 1.5 million barrels of
feedstock and product tankage, of which 0.2 million barrels of tankage are owned by HEP. The facility typically
processes or blends an additional 2,000 BPSD of natural gasoline, butane and gas oil over its 31,000 BPSD capacity.
We own and operate 4 miles of hydrogen pipeline that connects the Woods Cross Refinery to a hydrogen plant
located at Chevron’s Salt Lake City Refinery. Additionally, HEP owns and operates 12 miles of crude oil and
refined products pipelines that allows us to connect our Woods Cross Refinery to common carrier pipeline systems.
We plan to expand the Woods Cross refinery capacity to 45,000 BPSD at a cost of approximately $225 million. The
expansion is expected to be completed in late 2014. The expansion scope includes the relocation / revamp of crude,
fluid catalytic cracking, and polymerization units from a subsidiary of Western Refining Inc.'s (“Western”)
Bloomfield, New Mexico refinery to Woods Cross as well an expansion of the Woods Cross diesel hydrotreater.
We have signed a definitive agreement with Western for the purchase of the Bloomfield units.
-15-
In conjunction with the expansion, we signed a 10-year, 20,000 bpd crude oil supply agreement with Newfield
Exploration Company. This agreement, which commences upon completion of the expansion, will supply black and
yellow wax crude oil produced in the nearby Uinta Basin region to the Woods Cross Refinery, which currently has
capacity to process approximately 10,000 bpd of these crudes. Upon completion of this expansion, the Woods Cross
Refinery will be able to process approximately 24,000 bpd of waxy Utah crudes. This expansion and crude oil
supply agreement, and expected completion timeline, are subject to HollyFrontier successfully obtaining the
necessary permits and regulatory approvals.
Markets and Competition
The Cheyenne Refinery primarily markets its products in eastern Colorado, including metropolitan Denver, eastern
Wyoming and western Nebraska. Because of the location of the Cheyenne Refinery, we are able to sell a significant
portion of its diesel from the truck rack at the refinery, thus eliminating transportation costs. Pipeline shipments
from the Cheyenne Refinery are on the Plains pipeline serving Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado and HEP’s
pipeline to Sidney Nebraska.
Denver Market
The most competitive market for the Cheyenne Refinery is the Denver metropolitan area. Three other refineries
supply the Denver market, a refinery near Rawlins and one in Casper, both in Wyoming and owned by Sinclair and
a refinery in Denver owned by Suncor. Five product pipelines also supply Denver, including three from outside the
region. Typically products shipped in from other regions bear higher transportation costs. The Suncor refinery has
lower product transportation costs than we do; however, we have lower crude oil transportation costs because the
Cheyenne Refinery is located 88 miles south of Guernsey, Wyoming, the main hub and crude oil trading center for
the Rocky Mountain region. Moreover, unlike Sinclair and Suncor, we only sell our products to the wholesale
market. We believe this gives us an advantage because all of the Cheyenne Refinery’s principal competitors have
retail outlets and we do not directly compete with independent retailers of gasoline and diesel.
Utah Market
The Woods Cross Refinery’s primary market is Utah, which is currently supplied by a number of local refiners and
the Pioneer Pipeline. Local area refiners include Woods Cross, Chevron, Tesoro, Big West and Silver Eagle. Other
refiners that ship via the Pioneer Pipeline include Sinclair, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. We estimate that the
four refineries that compete with our Woods Cross Refinery have a combined capacity to process approximately
150,000 BPD of crude oil. The five Utah refineries collectively supply an estimated 70% of the gasoline and
distillate products consumed in the states of Utah and Idaho, with the remainder imported from refineries in
Wyoming and Montana via the Pioneer Pipeline owned jointly by Sinclair and ConocoPhillips. Approximately 40%
- 45% of the gasoline and diesel fuel produced by our Woods Cross Refinery is sold through a network of Phillips
66 branded marketers under a long-term supply agreement.
Idaho, Wyoming, Eastern Washington and Nevada Markets
We supply a small percentage of the refined products consumed in the combined Idaho, Wyoming, eastern
Washington and Nevada markets. Our Woods Cross Refinery ships refined products over Chevron’s common
carrier pipeline system to numerous terminals, including HEP’s terminals at Boise and Burley, Idaho and Spokane,
Washington and to terminals at Pocatello and Boise, Idaho and Pasco, Washington that are owned by Northwest
Terminalling Pipeline Company. We sell to branded and unbranded customers in these markets.
We have historically trucked refined products to Las Vegas, Nevada. The majority of the Las Vegas, Nevada
market for refined products is supplied by various West Coast refiners and suppliers via Kinder Morgan’s CalNev
common carrier pipeline system. See our discussion of the UNEV Pipeline below that will permit our Woods Cross
Refinery to ship significant volumes of refined product to Cedar City, Utah and Las Vegas, Nevada beginning in
2012.
Principal Products
Set forth below is information regarding the principal products produced at our Cheyenne and Woods Cross
Refineries:
-16-
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Rocky Mountain Region (Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries)
Sales of produced refined products:
Gasolines ......................................................................................................
Diesel fuels ...................................................................................................
Jet fuels .........................................................................................................
Fuel oil ..........................................................................................................
Asphalt ..........................................................................................................
LPG and other ...............................................................................................
Total ..............................................................................................................
56%
31%
1%
1%
6%
5%
100%
63%
30%
1%
1%
3%
2%
100%
64%
28%
1%
3%
2%
2%
100%
Crude Oil and Feedstock Supplies
Crude oil is transported to the Cheyenne Refinery from suppliers in Canada, Nebraska, North Dakota and Montana
via common carrier pipelines owned by Kinder Morgan, Plains All American Pipeline and Suncor Energy, as well as
by truck. The Woods Cross Refinery currently obtains its supply of crude oil from suppliers in Canada, Wyoming,
Utah and Colorado as delivered via common carrier pipelines that originate in Canada, Wyoming and Colorado. In
2009, we also began receiving crude oil via the SLC Pipeline, a joint venture common carrier pipeline in which HEP
owns a 25% interest. Supplies of black wax crude oil are shipped via truck.
NK Asphalt Partners
We manufacture and market commodity and modified asphalt products in Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Kansas, Missouri, Texas and northern Mexico. We have three manufacturing facilities located in Glendale, Arizona;
Albuquerque, New Mexico; and Artesia, New Mexico. Our Albuquerque and Artesia facilities manufacture
modified hot asphalt products and commodity emulsions from base asphalt materials provided by our refineries and
third-party suppliers. Our Glendale facility manufactures modified hot asphalt products from base asphalt materials
provided by our refineries and third-party suppliers. Our products are shipped via third-party trucking companies to
commercial customers that provide asphalt based materials for commercial and government projects.
Other Assets
We own Ethanol Management Company, a 25,000 bpd products terminal and blending facility located near Denver,
Colorado. We also own a 50% joint venture interest in Sabine Biofuels II, LLC, a 30 million gallon per year
biodiesel production facility located near Port Arthur, Texas.
UNEV Pipeline
We own a 75% joint venture interest in the recently completed UNEV Pipeline, a 400 mile 12-inch refined products
pipeline from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas, Nevada, together with terminal and ethanol blending facilities in
the Cedar City, Utah and North Las Vegas areas and storage facilities at the Cedar City terminal with Sinclair, our
joint venture partner, owning the remaining 25% interest. The pipeline has a capacity of 62,000 BPD (based on
gasoline equivalents), and has the capacity for further expansion to 120,000 BPD. The cost of constructing this
pipeline including terminals and ethanol blending and storage facilities was approximately $410 million. The
pipeline was mechanically complete in November 2011, and initial start-up activities commenced in December
2011.
We have entered into a 10-year minimum annual revenue guaranty of $15.4 million per year per year on the UNEV
Pipeline. This entitles us to ship approximately 15,500 BPD of refined product at a lower incentive tariff rate. We
have an option agreement with HEP granting them an option to purchase all of our equity interests in this joint
venture pipeline at a purchase price equal to our investment in this joint venture pipeline plus interest at 7% per
annum.
-17-
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
In July 2004, we completed the initial public offering of limited partnership interests in HEP, a Delaware limited
partnership that also trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HEP.” HEP was formed to
acquire, own and operate substantially all of the refined product pipeline and terminalling assets that support our
refining and marketing operations in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United
States.
HEP owns and operates a system of petroleum product and crude oil pipelines in New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas
and Utah and distribution terminals and refinery tankage in Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas,
Utah, Washington and Wyoming. HEP generates revenues by charging tariffs for transporting petroleum products
and crude oil through its pipelines, by leasing certain pipeline capacity to Alon by charging fees for terminalling
refined products and other hydrocarbons and storing and providing other services at its storage tanks and terminals.
HEP does not take ownership of products that it transports or terminals; therefore, it is not directly exposed to
changes in commodity prices.
HEP’s recent acquisitions (2009 through 2011) are summarized below:
2011 Acquisition
Legacy Frontier Pipeline and Tankage Asset Transaction
On November 9, 2011, HEP acquired from us certain tankage, loading rack and crude receiving assets located at our
El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries. We received non-cash consideration consisting of promissory notes with an
aggregate principal amount of $150 million and 3.8 million HEP common units.
2010 Acquisition
Tulsa East / Lovington Storage Asset Transaction
On March 31, 2010, HEP acquired from us certain storage assets for $93 million, consisting of hydrocarbon storage
tanks having approximately 2 million barrels of storage capacity, a rail loading rack and a truck unloading rack
located at our Tulsa East facility and an asphalt loading rack facility located at our Navajo Refinery facility located
in Lovington, New Mexico.
2009 Acquisitions
Sinclair Logistics and Storage Assets Transaction
On December 1, 2009, HEP acquired from Sinclair storage tanks having approximately 1.4 million barrels of storage
capacity and loading racks at what is now our Tulsa East facility for $79.2 million.
Roadrunner / Beeson Pipelines Transaction
Also on December 1, 2009, HEP acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $46.5 million, consisting of a 65-
mile, 16-inch crude oil pipeline (the “Roadrunner Pipeline”) that connects our Navajo Refinery Lovington facility
to a terminus of Centurion Pipeline L.P.’s pipeline extending between west Texas and Cushing, Oklahoma and a 37-
mile, 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects HEP’s New Mexico crude oil gathering system to our Navajo Refinery
Lovington facility (the “Beeson Pipeline”).
Tulsa West Loading Racks Transaction
On August 1, 2009, HEP acquired from us, certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our Tulsa
West facility for $17.5 million. The racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the Tulsa West facility
onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks.
Lovington-Artesia Pipeline Transaction
On June 1, 2009, HEP acquired our newly constructed, 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $34.2 million that runs 65
miles from our Navajo Refinery’s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in Lovington, New Mexico to our
petroleum refinery located in Artesia, New Mexico.
-18-
SLC Pipeline Joint Venture Interest
On March 1, 2009, HEP acquired a 25% joint venture interest in the SLC Pipeline, a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline
system jointly owned with Plains. HEP’s capitalized joint venture contribution was $25.5 million.
Rio Grande Pipeline Sale
On December 1, 2009, HEP sold its 70% interest in Rio Grande Pipeline Company (“Rio Grande”) to a subsidiary of
Enterprise Products Partners LP for $35 million. Results of operations of Rio Grande are presented in discontinued
operations.
Transportation Agreements
Agreements with HEP
HEP serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal, tankage and throughput agreements expiring in
2019 through 2026. Under these agreements, we pay HEP fees to transport, store and throughput volumes of refined
product and crude oil on HEP’s pipeline and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum
annual payments to HEP. Under these agreements, the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate
adjustments on July 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in Producer Price Index (“PPI”) or Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) index. As of December 31, 2011, these agreements result in minimum
annualized payments to HEP of $192 million.
We reconsolidated HEP effective March 1, 2008. Following our reconsolidation, our transactions with HEP
including fees that we pay under our HEP transportation agreements are eliminated and have no impact on our
consolidated financial statements since HEP is a consolidated VIE.
Agreement with Alon
HEP has a 15-year pipelines and terminals agreement with Alon expiring in 2020, under which Alon has agreed to
transport on HEP’s pipelines and throughput through its terminals, volumes of refined products that results in a
minimum level of annual revenue. The agreed upon tariff rates are increased or decreased annually at a rate equal to
the percentage change in PPI, but will not decrease below the initial tariff rate. Also, HEP has a capacity lease
agreement with Alon under which Alon leases space on HEP’s Orla to El Paso pipeline for the shipment of up to
15,000 barrels of refined product per day. The terms under this agreement expire in 2018 through 2022.
As of December 31, 2011, HEP’s assets include:
Pipelines
•
approximately 820 miles of refined product pipelines, including 340 miles of leased pipelines, that transport
gasoline, diesel and jet fuel principally from our Navajo Refinery in New Mexico to our customers in the
metropolitan and rural areas of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Utah and northern Mexico;
approximately 510 miles of refined product pipelines that transport refined products from Alon’s Big Spring
refinery in Texas to its customers in Texas and Oklahoma;
three 65-mile pipelines that transport intermediate feedstocks and crude oil from our Navajo Refinery crude
oil distillation and vacuum facilities in Lovington, New Mexico to our petroleum refinery facilities in
Artesia, New Mexico;
approximately 960 miles of crude oil trunk, gathering and connection pipelines located in west Texas, New
Mexico and Oklahoma that deliver crude oil to our Navajo Refinery;
approximately 10 miles of refined product pipelines that support our Woods Cross Refinery located near
Salt Lake City, Utah;
gasoline and diesel connecting pipelines that support our Tulsa East facility;
five intermediate product and gas pipelines between the Tulsa East and Tulsa West facilities; and
crude receiving assets located at our Cheyenne Refinery.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-19-
Refined Product Terminals and Refinery Tankage
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
four refined product terminals located in El Paso, Texas; Moriarty and Bloomfield, New Mexico; and
Tucson, Arizona, with an aggregate capacity of approximately 1,000,000 barrels, that are integrated with
HEP’s refined product pipeline system that serves our Navajo Refinery;
three refined product terminals (two of which are 50% owned) located in Burley and Boise, Idaho and
Spokane, Washington, with an aggregate capacity of approximately 500,000 barrels, that serve third-party
common carrier pipelines;
one refined product terminal near Mountain Home, Idaho, with a capacity of 120,000 barrels, that serves a
nearby United States Air Force Base;
two refined product terminals, located in Wichita Falls and Abilene, Texas, and one tank farm in Orla,
Texas with aggregate capacity of 480,000 barrels, that are integrated with HEP’s refined product pipelines
that serve Alon’s Big Spring, Texas refinery;
a refined product loading rack facility at each of our El Dorado, Tulsa, Navajo, Cheyenne and Woods Cross
Refineries, heavy product / asphalt loading rack facilities at our Tulsa East facility, Navajo Refinery
Lovington facility and Cheyenne Refinery, LPG loading rack facilities at our El Dorado Refinery, Tulsa
West facility and Cheyenne Refinery, lube oil loading racks at our Tulsa West facility and crude oil Leased
Automatic Custody Transfer (“LACT”) units located at our Cheyenne Refinery;
a leased jet fuel terminal in Roswell, New Mexico;
on-site crude oil tankage at our Tulsa, Navajo, Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries having an aggregate
storage capacity of approximately 1,400,000 barrels;
on-site crude oil, refined and intermediate product tankage at our El Dorado, Tulsa and Cheyenne Refineries
having an aggregate storage capacity of approximately 8,300,000 barrels;
HEP also owns a 25% joint venture interest in the SLC Pipeline, a 95-mile intrastate crude oil pipeline system that
serves refineries in the Salt Lake City area.
ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION
Corporate Offices
We lease approximately 46,000 square feet for our principal corporate offices in Dallas, Texas. The lease for our
principal corporate offices expires in 2021. Functions performed in the Dallas office include overall corporate
management, refinery and HEP management, planning and strategy, corporate finance, crude acquisition, logistics,
contract administration, marketing, investor relations, governmental affairs, accounting, tax, treasury, information
technology, legal and human resources support functions.
Employees and Labor Relations
As of December 31, 2011, we had 2,382 employees, of which 797 are currently covered by collective bargaining
agreements having various expiration dates between 2012 and 2016. We consider our employee relations to be
good.
Regulation
Refinery and pipeline operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of
substances into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. Permits are required
under these laws for the operation of our refineries, pipelines and related facilities, and these permits are subject to
revocation, modification and renewal. Over the years, there have been and continue to be ongoing communications,
including notices of violations, and discussions about environmental matters between us and federal and state
authorities, some of which have resulted or will result in changes to operating procedures and in capital
expenditures. Compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits will continue to have an
impact on our operations, the results of operations, and our capital requirements. We believe that our current
operations are in substantial compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental laws, regulations,
and permits.
Our operations and many of the products we manufacture are subject to certain requirements of the Federal Clean
Air Act (“CAA”) as well as related state and local laws and regulations. Certain CAA regulatory programs
applicable to our refineries require capital expenditures for the installation of certain air pollution control devices.
-20-
Subsequent rulemaking authorized by the CAA or similar laws, or new agency interpretations of existing laws and
regulations, may necessitate additional expenditures in future years.
Under the CAA, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has the authority to modify the formulation of the
refined transportation fuel products we manufacture in order to limit the emissions associated with their final use. In
June 2004, the EPA issued new regulations limiting emissions from diesel fuel powered engines used in non-road
activities such as mining, construction, agriculture, rail transport, and marine operations and simultaneously limiting
the sulfur content of diesel fuel used in these engines to facilitate compliance with the new emission standards. As
of December 31, 2011, all of our refineries produce non-road and highway diesel that meets the ultimate 15 ppm
sulfur standard.
Our refineries are subject to another EPA regulation limiting the annual average sulfur content in gasoline to 30
ppm. Currently, our refineries either meet this standard and balance annual average requirements by purchasing
from third parties or using internally generated sulfur credits.
Also, we are subject to the EPA’s new Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants from Mobile Sources (“MSAT2”)
regulations on gasoline that impose reductions in the benzene content of our produced gasoline. Our Tulsa, Navajo
and Woods Cross Refineries currently purchase benzene credits to meet these requirements. Our remaining
refineries become subject to the regulation in 2013. Our planned capital projects will reduce the amount of benzene
credits that we need to purchase. If economically justified, we could implement additional benzene reduction
projects to eliminate the need to purchase any benzene credits.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 prescribe certain percentages
of renewable fuels (e.g., ethanol and biofuels) that, where required, must be blended into our produced gasoline and
diesel. These new requirements, other requirements of the CAA, and other presently existing or future
environmental regulations may, where required, cause us to make substantial capital expenditures and purchase
credits at significant cost to enable our refineries to produce products that meet applicable requirements.
Further regulatory requirements have emerged from concerns over the potential climate impacts of certain
"greenhouse gases" such as carbon dioxide and methane. In response to a statutory directive, the EPA has
promulgated rules requiring the reporting of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2010, the EPA promulgated regulations
applying construction and operating permit requirements under the CAA’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration
and Title V programs to sources with potential greenhouse gas emissions above certain threshold levels. The EPA
has also announced its intention to issue a New Source Performance Standard directly regulating greenhouse gas
emissions from refineries. Proposals both expanding and limiting the EPA's authority in this area continue to be
considered in Congress, and litigation challenging the EPA’s authority over greenhouse gas emissions is currently
pending in federal court.
Our operations are also subject to the Federal Clean Water Act (“CWA”), the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act
(“SDWA”) and comparable state and local requirements. The CWA, the SDWA and analogous laws prohibit any
discharge into surface waters, ground waters, injection wells and publicly-owned treatment works except in
conformance with permits, such as pre-treatment permits and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(“NPDES”) permits, issued by federal, state and local governmental agencies. NPDES permits and analogous water
discharge permits are valid for a maximum of five years and must be renewed.
We generate wastes that may be subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable
state and local requirements. The EPA and various state agencies have limited the approved methods of disposal for
certain hazardous and non-hazardous wastes.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as
“Superfund,” imposes liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of
persons, including the current and past owner or operator of the disposal site or sites from which there is a release of
a “hazardous substance,” as well as persons that disposed of or arranged for the disposal or treatment of the
hazardous substances at the site or sites. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and several liability
for such costs as the cost of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment and
for damages to natural resources. In the course of our historical operations, as well as in our current normal
-21-
operations, we have generated waste, some of which falls within the statutory definition of a “hazardous substance”
and some of which may have been disposed of at sites that may be subject to cleanup and cost recovery actions
under CERCLA by a government entity or other third party. Similarly, locations now owned or operated by us,
where third parties have disposed such hazardous substances in the past, may also be subject to cleanup and cost
recovery actions under CERCLA. Under CERCLA, liable parties may seek contribution from other liable parties to
share in the costs of cleanup. Some states have enacted laws similar to CERCLA which impose similar
responsibilities and liabilities on responsible parties. It is also not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other
third parties to file claims under state law for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous
substances or other pollutants released into the environment.
As is the case with all companies engaged in industries similar to ours, we face potential exposure to future claims
and lawsuits involving environmental matters. These matters include soil and water contamination, air pollution,
personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by substances which we manufactured, handled, used,
released or disposed of.
We currently have environmental remediation projects that relate to recovery, treatment and monitoring activities
resulting from past releases of refined product and crude oil into the environment. As of December 31, 2011, we
had an accrual of $42.2 million related to such environmental liabilities.
We are and have been the subject of various state, federal and private proceedings and inquiries relating to
compliance with environmental regulations and conditions, including those discussed above. Compliance with
current and future environmental regulations is expected to require additional expenditures, including expenditures
for investigation and remediation, which may be significant, at our refineries and at pipeline transportation facilities.
To the extent that future expenditures for these purposes are material and can be reasonably determined, these costs
are disclosed and accrued, if applicable.
Our operations are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to occupational health and safety. We
maintain safety, training and maintenance programs as part of our ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with
applicable laws and regulations. Compliance with applicable health and safety laws and regulations has required
and continues to require substantial expenditures.
Health and environmental legislation and regulations change frequently. We cannot predict what additional health
and environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted or become effective in the future or how existing or
future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted with respect to our operations. Compliance with more
stringent laws or regulations or adverse changes in the interpretation of existing laws or regulations by government
agencies could have an adverse effect on the financial position and the results of our operations and could require
substantial expenditures for the installation and operation of systems and equipment that we do not currently
possess.
Insurance
Our operations are subject to normal hazards of operations, including fire, explosion and weather-related perils. We
maintain various insurance coverages, including business interruption insurance, subject to certain deductibles. We
are not fully insured against certain risks because such risks are not fully insurable, coverage is unavailable, or
premium costs, in our judgment, do not justify such expenditures.
We have a risk management oversight committee that is made up of members from our senior management. This
committee oversees our risk enterprise program, monitors our risk environment and provides direction for activities
to mitigate identified risks that may adversely affect the achievement of our goals.
-22-
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Investing in us involves a degree of risk, including the risks described below. Our operating results have been, and
will continue to be, affected by a wide variety of risk factors, many of which are beyond our control, that could have
adverse effects on profitability during any particular period. You should carefully consider the following risk factors
together with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial
statements and related notes, when deciding to invest in us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to
us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business operations. If
any of the following risks were to actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
The prices of crude oil and refined products materially affect our profitability, and are dependent upon many
factors that are beyond our control, including general market demand and economic conditions, seasonal and
weather-related factors and governmental regulations and policies.
Among these factors is the demand for crude oil and refined products, which is largely driven by the conditions of
local and worldwide economies as well as by weather patterns and the taxation of these products relative to other
energy sources. Governmental regulations and policies, particularly in the areas of taxation, energy and the
environment, also have a significant impact on our activities. Operating results can be affected by these industry
factors, product and crude pipeline capacities, changes in transportation costs, accidents or interruptions in
transportation, competition in the particular geographic areas that we serve, and factors that are specific to us, such
as the success of particular marketing programs and the efficiency of our refinery operations. The demand for crude
oil and refined products can also be reduced due to a local or national recession or other adverse economic condition
that results in lower spending by businesses and consumers on gasoline and diesel fuel, higher gasoline prices due to
higher crude oil prices, a shift by consumers to more fuel-efficient vehicles or alternative fuel vehicles (such as
ethanol or wider adoption of gas/electric hybrid vehicles), or an increase in vehicle fuel economy, whether as a
result of technological advances by manufacturers, legislation mandating or encouraging higher fuel economy or the
use of alternative fuel.
We do not produce crude oil and must purchase all our crude oil, the price of which fluctuates based upon
worldwide and local market conditions. Our profitability depends largely on the spread between market prices for
refined petroleum products and crude oil prices. This margin is continually changing and may fluctuate significantly
from time to time. Crude oil and refined products are commodities whose price levels are determined by market
forces beyond our control. Additionally, due to the seasonality of refined products markets and refinery maintenance
schedules, results of operations for any particular quarter of a fiscal year are not necessarily indicative of results for
the full year. In general, prices for refined products are influenced by the price of crude oil. Although an increase or
decrease in the price for crude oil may result in a similar increase or decrease in prices for refined products, there
may be a time lag in the realization of the similar increase or decrease in prices for refined products. The effect of
changes in crude oil prices on operating results therefore depends in part on how quickly refined product prices
adjust to reflect these changes. A substantial or prolonged increase in crude oil prices without a corresponding
increase in refined product prices, a substantial or prolonged decrease in refined product prices without a
corresponding decrease in crude oil prices, or a substantial or prolonged decrease in demand for refined products
could have a significant negative effect on our earnings and cash flows. Also, crude oil supply contracts are
generally short-term contracts with market-responsive pricing provisions. We purchase our refinery feedstocks
weeks before manufacturing and selling the refined products. Price level changes during the period between
purchasing feedstocks and selling the manufactured refined products from these feedstocks could have a significant
effect on our financial results.
We may not be able to successfully execute our business strategies to grow our business. Further, if we are
unable to complete capital projects at their expected costs or in a timely manner, or if the market conditions
assumed in our project economics deteriorate, our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could
be materially and adversely affected.
One of the ways we may grow our business is through the construction of new refinery processing units (or the
purchase and refurbishment of used units from another refinery) and the expansion of existing ones. Projects are
generally initiated to increase the yields of higher-value products, increase the amount of lower cost crude oils that
-23-
can be processed, increase refinery production capacity, meet new governmental requirements, or maintain the
operations of our existing assets. Additionally, our growth strategy includes projects that permit access to new
and/or more profitable markets such as our UNEV Pipeline joint venture, a 12-inch refined products pipeline
running from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas, Nevada in which our subsidiary owns a 75% interest. The
construction process involves numerous regulatory, environmental, political, and legal uncertainties, most of which
are not fully within our control, including:
• denial or delay in issuing requisite regulatory approvals and/or permits;
• compliance with or liability under environmental regulations;
• unplanned increases in the cost of construction materials or labor;
• disruptions in transportation of modular components and/or construction materials;
• severe adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, or other events (such as equipment malfunctions
explosions, fires, spills) affecting our facilities, or those of vendors and suppliers;
• shortages of sufficiently skilled labor, or labor disagreements resulting in unplanned work stoppages;
• market-related increases in a project’s debt or equity financing costs; and/or
• nonperformance or force majeure by, or disputes with, vendors, suppliers, contractors, or sub-contractors
involved with a project.
If we are unable to complete capital projects at their expected costs or in a timely manner our financial condition,
results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Delays in making required changes
or upgrades to our facilities could subject us to fines or penalties as well as affect our ability to supply certain
products we make. In addition, our revenues may not increase immediately upon the expenditure of funds on a
particular project. For instance, if we build a new refinery processing unit, the construction will occur over an
extended period of time and we will not receive any material increases in revenues until after completion of the
project. Moreover, we may construct facilities to capture anticipated future growth in demand for refined products in
a region in which such growth does not materialize. As a result, new capital investments may not achieve our
expected investment return, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our forecasted internal rates of return are also based upon our projections of future market fundamentals which are
not within our control, including changes in general economic conditions, available alternative supply and customer
demand.
In addition, a component of our growth strategy is to selectively acquire complementary assets for our refining
operations in order to increase earnings and cash flow. Our ability to do so will be dependent upon a number of
factors, including our ability to identify attractive acquisition candidates, consummate acquisitions on favorable
terms, successfully integrate acquired assets and obtain financing to fund acquisitions and to support our growth,
and other factors beyond our control. Risks associated with acquisitions include those relating to:
• diversion of management time and attention from our existing business;
• challenges in managing the increased scope, geographic diversity and complexity of operations;
• difficulties in integrating the financial, technological and management standards, processes, procedures and
controls of an acquired business with those of our existing operations;
• liability for known or unknown environmental conditions or other contingent liabilities not covered by
indemnification or insurance;
• greater than anticipated expenditures required for compliance with environmental or other regulatory standards or
for investments to improve operating results;
• difficulties in achieving anticipated operational improvements;
• incurrence of additional indebtedness to finance acquisitions or capital expenditures relating to acquired assets;
and
• issuance of additional equity, which could result in further dilution of the ownership interest of existing
stockholders.
We may not be successful in acquiring additional assets, and any acquisitions that we do consummate may not
produce the anticipated benefits or may have adverse effects on our business and operating results.
-24-
Our leverage may limit our ability to borrow additional funds, comply with the terms of our indebtedness or
capitalize on business opportunities.
As of December 31, 2011, the principal amount of our total consolidated outstanding debt was $1,214.4 million,
including $535 million of HEP debt.
Our leverage could have important consequences. We require substantial cash flow to meet our payment obligations
with respect to our indebtedness. Our ability to make scheduled payments, to refinance our obligations with respect
to our indebtedness or our ability to obtain additional financing in the future will depend on our financial and
operating performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and
other factors. We believe that we will have sufficient cash flow from operations, available cash on hand, and
available borrowings under our Credit Agreement to service our indebtedness. However, a significant downturn in
our business or other development adversely affecting our cash flow could materially impair our ability to service
our indebtedness. If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may
be forced to refinance all or a portion of our debt or sell assets. We cannot assure you that we would be able to
refinance our existing indebtedness at maturity or otherwise or sell assets on terms that are commercially reasonable.
We may not be able to obtain funding on acceptable terms or at all because of volatility and uncertainty in the
credit and capital markets. This may hinder or prevent us from meeting our future capital needs.
The domestic and global financial markets and economic conditions are disrupted and volatile from time to time due
to a variety of factors, including most recently, low consumer confidence, continued high unemployment,
geoeconomic and geopolitical issues, weak economic conditions and uncertainty in the financial services sector. In
addition, the fixed-income markets have experienced periods of extreme volatility, which negatively impacted
market liquidity conditions. As a result, the cost of raising money in the debt and equity capital markets has
increased substantially at times while the availability of funds from these markets diminished significantly. In
particular, as a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of lending
counterparties specifically, the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets may increase as many lenders and
institutional investors increase interest rates, enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt on
similar terms or at all and reduce, or in some cases cease, to provide funding to borrowers. In addition, lending
counterparties under existing revolving credit facilities and other debt instruments may be unwilling or unable to
meet their funding obligations. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that new debt or equity financing will be
available on acceptable terms. If funding is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we
may be unable to meet our obligations as they come due. Moreover, without adequate funding, we may be unable to
execute our growth strategy, complete future acquisitions or announced and future pipeline construction projects,
take advantage of other business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.
We may incur significant costs to comply with new or changing environmental, energy, health and safety laws
and regulations, and face potential exposure for environmental matters.
Refinery and pipeline operations are subject to federal, state and local laws regulating, among other things, the
generation, storage, handling, use and transportation of petroleum and hazardous substances, the emission and
discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, and characteristics and composition of gasoline and
diesel fuels, and other matters otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. Permits are required under
these laws for the operation of our refineries, pipelines and related operations, and these permits are subject to
revocation, modification and renewal or may require operational changes, which may involve significant costs.
Furthermore, a violation of permit conditions or other legal or regulatory requirements could result in substantial
fines, criminal sanctions, permit revocations, injunctions, and/or refinery shutdowns. In addition, major
modifications of our operations due to changes in the law could require changes to our existing permits or expensive
upgrades to our existing pollution control equipment, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, or results of operations. Over the years, there have been and continue to be ongoing
communications, including notices of violations, and discussions about environmental matters between us and
federal and state authorities, some of which have resulted or will result in changes to operating procedures and in
capital expenditures. Compliance with applicable environmental laws, regulations and permits will continue to have
an impact on our operations, results of operations and capital requirements.
-25-
As is the case with all companies engaged in industries similar to ours, we face potential exposure to future claims
and lawsuits involving environmental matters. The matters include soil and water contamination, air pollution,
personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by substances which we manufactured, handled, used,
released or disposed.
We are and have been the subject of various state, federal and private proceedings relating to environmental
regulations, conditions and inquiries. Current and future environmental regulations are expected to require additional
expenditures, including expenditures for investigation and remediation, which may be significant, at our facilities.
To the extent that future expenditures for these purposes are material and can be reasonably determined, these costs
are disclosed and accrued.
Our operations are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to occupational health and safety. We
maintain safety, training and maintenance programs as part of our ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with
applicable laws and regulations. Compliance with applicable health and safety laws and regulations has required and
continues to require substantial expenditures.
We cannot predict what additional health and environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted or become
effective in the future or how existing or future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted with respect
to our operations. However, new environmental laws and regulations, including new regulations relating to
alternative energy sources and the risk of global climate change, new interpretations of existing laws and
regulations, increased governmental enforcement or other developments could require us to make additional
unforeseen expenditures. The EPA has begun regulating certain emissions of greenhouse gases, or “GHGs,”
(including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxides) from large stationary sources like refineries under the
authority of the CAA, and it is possible that Congress could pass federal legislation that creates a comprehensive
GHG regulatory program, either directly or indirectly, such as via a federal renewal energy standard. Also, new
federal or state legislation or regulatory programs that restrict emissions of GHGs in areas where we conduct
business could adversely affect our operations and demand for our products.
The costs of environmental and safety regulations are already significant and compliance with more stringent laws
or regulations or adverse changes in the interpretation of existing regulations by government agencies could have an
adverse effect on the financial position and the results of our operations and could require substantial expenditures
for the installation and operation of systems and equipment that we do not currently possess.
From time to time, new federal energy policy legislation is enacted by the U.S. Congress. For example, in December
2007, the U.S. Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act, which, among other provisions,
mandates annually increasing levels for the use of renewable fuels such as ethanol, commencing in 2008 and
escalating for 15 years, as well as increasing energy efficiency goals, including higher fuel economy standards for
motor vehicles, among other steps. These statutory mandates may have the impact over time of offsetting projected
increases in the demand for refined petroleum products in certain markets, particularly gasoline. In the near term,
the new renewable fuel standard presents ethanol production and logistics challenges for both the ethanol and
refining industries and may require additional capital expenditures or expenses by us to accommodate increased
ethanol use. Other legislative changes may similarly alter the expected demand and supply projections for refined
petroleum products in ways that cannot be predicted.
For additional information on regulations and related liabilities or potential liabilities affecting our business, see
“Regulation” under Items 1 and 2, “Business and Properties,” and Item 3, “Legal Proceedings.”
The adoption of climate change legislation by Congress could result in increased operating costs and reduced
demand for the refined products we produce.
In December 2009, the EPA determined that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs present an
endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA,
contributing to warming of the earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. Based on these findings, the EPA has
begun adopting and implementing regulations to restrict emissions of GHGs under existing provisions of the federal
CAA. The EPA also adopted two sets of rules regulating GHG emissions under the CAA, one of which requires a
-26-
reduction in emissions of GHGs from motor vehicles and the other of which regulates emissions of GHGs from
certain large stationary sources. The EPA’s rules relating to emissions of GHGs from large stationary sources of
emissions are currently subject to a number of legal challenges, but the federal courts have thus far declined to issue
any injunctions to prevent the EPA from implementing or requiring state environmental agencies to implement the
rules. The EPA has also adopted rules requiring the reporting of GHG emissions from specified large GHG
emission sources in the United States, including petroleum refineries, on an annual basis.
In addition, the United States Congress has from time to time considered adopting legislation to reduce emissions of
GHGs and almost one-half of the states have already taken legal measures to reduce emissions of GHGs primarily
through the planned development of GHG emission inventories and/or regional GHG cap and trade programs.
These cap and trade programs generally work by requiring major sources of emissions, such as electric power plants,
or major producers of fuels, such as refineries and gas processing plants, to acquire and on an annual basis surrender
emission allowances. The number of allowances available for purchase is reduced over time in an effort to achieve
the overall GHG emission reduction goal.
The adoption of legislation or regulatory programs to reduce emissions of GHGs could require us to incur increased
operating costs, such as costs to purchase and operate emissions control systems, to acquire emissions allowances or
comply with new regulatory or reporting requirements. Any such legislation or regulatory programs could also
increase the cost of consuming, and thereby reduce demand for, the refined products that we produce.
Consequently, legislation and regulatory programs to reduce emissions of GHGs could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the Earth’s atmosphere may
produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms,
droughts, floods and other climatic events. If any such events were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to information technology system failures, network disruptions and breaches in data security.
Information technology system failures, network disruptions (whether intentional by a third party or due to natural
disaster), breaches of network or data security, or disruption or failure of the network system used to monitor and
control pipeline operations could disrupt our operations by impeding our processing of transactions, our ability to
protect customer or company information and our financial reporting. Our computer systems, including our back-up
systems, could be damaged or interrupted by power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer
viruses, internal or external security breaches, events such as fires, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes and hurricanes,
and/or errors by our employees. Although we have taken steps to address these concerns by implementing
sophisticated network security and internal control measures, there can be no assurance that a system failure or data
security breach will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
To successfully operate our petroleum refining facilities, we are required to expend significant amounts for
capital outlays and operating expenditures.
The refining business is characterized by high fixed costs resulting from the significant capital outlays associated
with refineries, terminals, pipelines and related facilities. We are dependent on the production and sale of quantities
of refined products at refined product margins sufficient to cover operating costs, including any increases in costs
resulting from future inflationary pressures or market conditions and increases in costs of fuel and power necessary
in operating our facilities. Furthermore, future regulatory requirements or competitive pressures could result in
additional capital expenditures, which may not produce a return on investment. Such capital expenditures may
require significant financial resources that may be contingent on our access to capital markets and commercial bank
loans. Additionally, other matters, such as regulatory requirements or legal actions, may restrict our access to funds
for capital expenditures.
Our refineries consist of many processing units, a number of which have been in operation for many years. One or
more of the units may require unscheduled downtime for unanticipated maintenance or repairs that are more
frequent than our scheduled turnaround for such units. Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance could reduce our
revenues during the period of time that the units are not operating. We have taken significant measures to expand
-27-
and upgrade units in our refineries by installing new equipment and redesigning older equipment to improve refinery
capacity. The installation and redesign of key equipment at our refineries involves significant uncertainties,
including the following: our upgraded equipment may not perform at expected throughput levels; the yield and
product quality of new equipment may differ from design and/or specifications and redesign or modification of the
equipment may be required to correct equipment that does not perform as expected, which could require facility
shutdowns until the equipment has been redesigned or modified. Any of these risks associated with new
equipment, redesigned older equipment, or repaired equipment could lead to lower revenues or higher costs or
otherwise have a negative impact on our future results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, we expect to execute turnarounds at our refineries, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties.
These risks include delays and incurrence of additional and unforeseen costs. The turnarounds allow us to perform
maintenance, upgrades, overhaul and repair of process equipment and materials, during which time all or a portion
of the refinery will be under scheduled downtime.
Our operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions for which we may not be
adequately insured.
Our operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions such as natural disasters, adverse
weather, accidents, fires, explosions, hazardous materials releases, power failures, mechanical failures and other
events beyond our control. These events might result in a loss of equipment or life or destruction of property, injury,
or extensive property damage, as well as a curtailment or an interruption in our operations and may affect our ability
to meet marketing commitments. Furthermore, we may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and
amount we desire at reasonable rates. As a result of market conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain of our
insurance policies could increase. In some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or available only
for reduced amounts of coverage. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position. If any refinery were to experience an interruption in
operations, earnings from the refinery could be materially adversely affected (to the extent not recoverable through
insurance) because of lost production and repair costs.
We maintain significant insurance coverage, but it does not cover all potential losses, costs or liabilities, and our
business interruption insurance coverage generally does not apply unless a business interruption exceeds 45 days.
We could suffer losses for uninsurable or uninsured risks or in amounts in excess of our existing insurance coverage.
Our ability to obtain and maintain adequate insurance may be affected by conditions in the insurance market over
which we have no control. The occurrence of an event that is not fully covered by insurance could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The energy industry is highly capital intensive, and the entire or partial loss of individual facilities can result in
significant costs to both industry companies, such as us, and their insurance carriers. In recent years, several large
energy industry claims have resulted in significant increases in the level of premium costs and deductible periods for
participants in the energy industry. As a result of large energy industry claims, insurance companies that have
historically participated in underwriting energy-related facilities may discontinue that practice or demand
significantly higher premiums or deductible periods to cover these facilities. If significant changes in the number or
financial solvency of insurance underwriters for the energy industry occur, or if other adverse conditions over which
we have no control prevail in the insurance market, we may be unable to obtain and maintain adequate insurance at
reasonable cost. In addition, we cannot assure you that our insurers will renew our insurance coverage on
acceptable terms, if at all, or that we will be able to arrange for adequate alternative coverage in the event of non-
renewal. Further, our underwriters could have credit issues that affect their ability to pay claims. The unavailability
of full insurance coverage to cover events in which we suffer significant losses could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Insufficient ethanol, biodiesel, and other advanced biofuel supplies, or disruption in supply, may disrupt our
ability to meet RFS2 regulations mandated by the federal government or required in the fuels markets that we
serve.
If we are unable to obtain or maintain sufficient quantities of ethanol for our blending needs, our sale of ethanol
gasoline (required in several of our markets) could be interrupted or suspended which could result in lower profits.
-28-
Likewise, if we are unable to purchase renewable identification numbers (“RINs”), or if our supply of RINs is such
that we have to pay a significantly higher price for RINs to meet our mandated blending volumes of biofuels per
the RFS2 regulation, our profits would be significantly lower. If we are unable to pass the costs of compliance with
RFS2 on to our customers, our profits would be significantly lower.
Competition in the refining and marketing industry is intense, and an increase in competition in the markets in
which we sell our products could adversely affect our earnings and profitability.
We compete with a broad range of refining and marketing companies, including certain multinational oil companies.
Because of their geographic diversity, larger and more complex refineries, integrated operations and greater
resources, some of our competitors may be better able to withstand volatile market conditions, to obtain crude oil in
times of shortage and to bear the economic risks inherent in all areas of the refining industry.
We are not engaged in petroleum exploration and production activities and do not produce any of the crude oil
feedstocks used at our refineries. We do not have a retail business and therefore are dependent upon others for
outlets for our refined products. Certain of our competitors, however, obtain a portion of their feedstocks from
company-owned production and have retail outlets. Competitors that have their own production or extensive retail
outlets, with brand-name recognition, are at times able to offset losses from refining operations with profits from
producing or retailing operations, and may be better positioned to withstand periods of depressed refining margins or
feedstock shortages.
In recent years there have been several refining and marketing consolidations or acquisitions between entities
competing in our geographic market. These transactions could increase the future competitive pressures on us.
Portions of our operations in the areas we operate may be impacted by competitors’ plans for expansion projects and
refinery improvements that could increase the production of refined products in our areas of operation and
significantly affect our profitability.
In addition, we compete with other industries that provide alternative means to satisfy the energy and fuel
requirements of our industrial, commercial and individual consumers. The more successful these alternatives
become as a result of governmental regulations, technological advances, consumer demand, improved pricing or
otherwise, the greater the impact on pricing and demand for our products and our profitability. There are presently
significant governmental and consumer pressures to increase the use of alternative fuels in the United States.
We may be unsuccessful in integrating the operations of the assets we have recently acquired or of any future
acquisitions with our operations, and in realizing all or any part of the anticipated benefits of any such
acquisitions.
From time to time, we evaluate and acquire assets and businesses that we believe complement our existing assets
and businesses. For example, we face certain challenges as we continue to integrate the operations of Frontier Oil
Corporation, with whom we merged in 2011, into our business. Acquisitions may require substantial capital or the
incurrence of substantial indebtedness. Our capitalization and results of operations may change significantly as a
result of the acquisitions we recently completed or as a result of future acquisitions. Acquisitions and business
expansions involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the assets and operations of the
acquired businesses, inefficiencies and difficulties that arise because of unfamiliarity with new assets and the
businesses associated with them and new geographic areas and the diversion of management’s attention from other
business concerns. Further, unexpected costs and challenges may arise whenever businesses with different
operations or management are combined, and we may experience unanticipated delays in realizing the benefits of an
acquisition, including the merger in 2011. Also, following an acquisition, we may discover previously unknown
liabilities associated with the acquired business or assets for which we have no recourse under applicable
indemnification provisions.
The new and revamped equipment in our facilities may not perform according to expectations which may cause
unexpected maintenance and downtime and could have a negative effect on our future results of operations and
financial condition.
-29-
From time to time, we have major capital investment and various environmental compliance related projects at our
refineries. The installation of new equipment and the revamp of key existing equipment involve significant risks
and uncertainties, including the following:
• Equipment may not perform at expected throughput levels;
• Actual yields or product quality may differ from design;
• Actual operating costs may be higher than expected;
• Equipment may need to be redesigned, revamped, or replaced for the new units to perform as expected.
A material decrease in the supply of crude oil available to our refineries could significantly reduce our
production levels.
To maintain or increase production levels at our refineries, we must continually contract for crude oil supplies from
third parties. A material decrease in crude oil production from the fields that supply our refineries, as a result of
depressed commodity prices, lack of drilling activity, natural production declines or otherwise, could result in a
decline in the volume of crude oil available to our refineries. In addition, any prolonged disruption of a significant
pipeline that is used in supplying crude oil to our refineries or the potential operation of a new, converted or
expanded crude oil pipeline that transports crude oil to other markets could result in a decline in the volume of crude
oil available to our refineries. Such an event could result in an overall decline in volumes of refined products
processed at our refineries and therefore a corresponding reduction in our cash flow. In addition, the future growth
of our operations will depend in part upon whether we can contract for additional supplies of crude oil at a greater
rate than the rate of natural decline in our currently connected supplies. If we are unable to secure additional crude
oil supplies of sufficient quality or crude pipeline expansion to our refineries, we will be unable to take full
advantage of current and future expansion of our refineries’ production capacities.
The disruption or proration of the refined product distribution systems we utilize could negatively impact our
profitability.
We utilize various common carrier or other third party pipeline systems to deliver our products to market. The key
systems utilized by Cheyenne, El Dorado, Navajo, Woods Cross, and Tulsa are Rocky Mountain, NuStar Energy,
SFPP and Plains, Chevron, and Magellan, respectively. All five refineries also utilize systems owned by HEP. If
these key pipelines or their associated tanks and terminals become inoperative or decrease the capacity available to
us, we may not be able to sell our product, or we may be required to hold our product in inventory or supply
products to our customers through an alternative pipeline or by rail or additional tanker trucks from the refinery, all
of which could increase our costs and result in a decline in profitability.
The proposed reversal of the Seaway Pipeline is expected to increase demand for crude oil from the Northwestern
United States and Canada, which we expect to affect price advantages that have been in our favor and which may
adversely affect our profit margins.
On November 16, 2011, Enbridge Inc. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. announced that they had agreed with
ConocoPhillips to acquire the Seaway Crude Pipeline System. The 670-mile Seaway Crude Pipeline System
includes the 500-mile, 30-inch diameter Freeport, Texas to Cushing, Oklahoma long-haul system. This pipeline
currently transports crude oil to the Cushing facility from the U.S. Gulf Coast; however, Enbridge, Inc. and
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. announced their intention to reverse the direction of crude oil flows on the Seaway
pipeline such that it will transport crude from Cushing, Oklahoma to the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Our profit margins depend primarily on the spread between the price of crude oil and the price of the refined
product. We were generally able to purchase crude oil at favorable prices due to a bottleneck of crude oil at the
Cushing, Oklahoma transport hub. This bottleneck prevented crude from the Northwestern United States and
Canada from reaching many competing refineries. The reversal of the Seaway Crude Pipeline is expected to
alleviate this bottleneck, and therefore could eliminate the market dynamic that allowed us to enjoy favorable
pricing. This may adversely affect our profit margins.
-30-
The potential operation of new or expanded refined product transportation pipelines could impact the supply of
refined products to our existing markets.
The refined product transportation pipelines that also supply the markets supplied by the Navajo Refinery include
Longhorn, Kinder Morgan, Plains, HEP, and NuStar Energy. The Longhorn Pipeline is a common carrier pipeline
that supplies the El Paso market with refined products from refineries as distant as the Texas Gulf Coast. The
Longhorn Pipeline is a converted crude oil pipeline with an approximate capacity of 72,000 BPD of refined
products. Magellan purchased the Longhorn Pipeline out of bankruptcy in 2009. Flying J formerly owned the
Longhorn Pipeline prior to its bankruptcy in 2008. In addition to supplying Arizona markets from El Paso, Kinder
Morgan also supplies Arizona markets from the West Coast. The Plains pipeline currently supplies New Mexico
markets from El Paso. In addition, NuStar Energy LP and HEP own pipelines into the El Paso and New Mexico
markets.
The refined product transportation pipelines that also supply the markets supplied by the Woods Cross Refinery
include Chevron, Pioneer, and Yellowstone Pipelines. The Chevron system transports products from Salt Lake City
to Idaho and eastern Washington. The Pioneer Pipeline transports products from Wyoming and Montana refineries
into Salt Lake City. The Yellowstone Pipeline transports products from Montana refineries into eastern
Washington.
The refined product transportation pipelines that also supply the markets supplied by the Tulsa and El Dorado
Refineries include Magellan, Explorer, and Kaneb Pipelines. The Explorer Pipeline transports refined products from
Gulf Coast refineries to Tulsa where it interconnects with Magellan prior to proceeding to the Chicago area. The
Kaneb Pipeline transports refined products from northern Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas refineries to markets in
Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota. These markets are in close proximity to markets
supplied by the Magellan system.
The refined product transportation pipelines that also supply the markets supplied by the Cheyenne Refinery include
Rocky Mountain, Magellan Mountain, Conoco, Medicine Bow, and Nustar Pipelines. The Rocky Mountain Pipeline
System which transports the Cheyenne Refinery’s products to Denver also transports refined products from
Wyoming and further north to Cheyenne and Denver. The Medicine Bow pipeline delivers refined products from
Sinclair Wyoming. The Magellan Mountain pipeline delivers refined products directly from Kansas but those
products may be supplied all the way from the Gulf Coast. The Conoco and Nustar pipelines bring products in from
the Texas panhandle.
The expansion of any of these pipelines, the conversion of existing pipelines into refined products, or the
construction of a new pipeline into our markets could negatively impact the supply of refined products in our
markets and our profitability.
We depend upon HEP for a substantial portion of the crude supply and distribution network that serve our
refineries and we own a significant equity interest in HEP.
We currently own a 42% interest in HEP, including the 2% general partner interest. HEP operates a system of crude
oil and petroleum product pipelines, distribution terminals and refinery tankage in Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. HEP generates revenues by charging tariffs for
transporting petroleum products and crude oil through its pipelines, by leasing certain pipeline capacity to Alon, by
charging fees for terminalling refined products and other hydrocarbons and storing and providing other services at
its terminals. HEP serves our refineries in New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, Kansas and Oklahoma under several long-
term pipeline and terminal, tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2025. Furthermore, our
financial statements include the consolidated results of HEP. HEP is subject to its own operating and regulatory
risks, including, but not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
its reliance on its significant customers, including us;
competition from other pipelines;
environmental regulations affecting pipeline operations;
operational hazards and risks;
pipeline tariff regulations affecting the rates HEP can charge;
-31-
•
•
limitations on additional borrowings and other restrictions due to HEP’s debt covenants; and
other financial, operational and legal risks.
The occurrence of any of these risks could directly or indirectly affect HEP’s as well as our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows as HEP is a consolidated VIE. Additionally, these risks could affect HEP’s
ability to continue operations which could affect their ability to serve our supply and distribution network needs.
For additional information about HEP, see “Holly Energy Partners, L.P.” under Items 1 and 2, “Business and
Properties.”
We are exposed to the credit risks, and certain other risks, of our key customers and vendors.
We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our customers. We derive a
significant portion of our revenues from contracts with key customers.
If any of our key customers default on their obligations to us, our financial results could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, some of our customers may be highly leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory
risks. In addition, nonperformance by vendors who have committed to provide us with products or services could
result in higher costs or interfere with our ability to successfully conduct our business.
Any substantial increase in the nonpayment and/or nonperformance by our customers or vendors could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
Terrorist attacks, and the threat of terrorist attacks or domestic vandalism, have resulted in increased costs to our
business. Continued hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military campaigns may adversely impact
our results of operations.
The long-term impacts of terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, and the threat of
future terrorist attacks on the energy transportation industry in general, and on us in particular, are not known at this
time. Increased security measures taken by us as a precaution against possible terrorist attacks or vandalism have
resulted in increased costs to our business. Future terrorist attacks could lead to even stronger, more costly initiatives
or regulatory requirements. Uncertainty surrounding continued hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained
military campaigns may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including disruptions of crude oil supplies and
markets for refined products, and the possibility that infrastructure facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect
casualties of, an act of terror. In addition, disruption or significant increases in energy prices could result in
government-imposed price controls. Any one of, or a combination of, these occurrences could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist attacks could make certain types of insurance more
difficult for us to obtain. Moreover, the insurance that may be available to us may be significantly more expensive
than our existing insurance coverage. Instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism or war could also
affect our ability to raise capital including our ability to repay or refinance debt.
We may not be able to retain existing customers or acquire new customers.
The renewal or replacement of existing contracts with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain current revenues
and cash flows depends on a number of factors outside our control, including competition from other refiners and
the demand for refined products in the markets that we serve. Loss of, or reduction in, amounts purchased by our
major customers could have an adverse effect on us to the extent that, because of market limitations or transportation
constraints, we are not able to correspondingly increase sales to other purchasers.
Our petroleum business’ financial results are seasonal and generally lower in the first and fourth quarters of the
year, which may cause volatility in the price of our common stock.
Demand for gasoline products is generally higher during the summer months than during the winter months due to
seasonal increases in highway traffic and road construction work. As a result, our results of operations for the first
-32-
and fourth calendar quarters are generally lower than for those for the second and third quarters. The effects of
seasonal demand for gasoline are partially offset by seasonality in demand for diesel fuel, which in the Southwest
region of the United States is generally higher in winter months as east-west trucking traffic moves south to avoid
winter conditions on northern routes. However, unseasonably cool weather in the summer months and/or
unseasonably warm weather in the winter months in the markets in which we sell our petroleum products could have
the effect of reducing demand for gasoline and diesel fuel which could result in lower prices and reduce operating
margins.
We may be unable to pay future dividends.
We will only be able to pay dividends from our available cash on hand, cash from operations or borrowings under our
credit agreement. The declaration of future dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of
directors and will depend upon many factors, including our results of operations, financial condition, earnings, capital
requirements, and restrictions in our debt agreements and legal requirements. We cannot assure you that any dividends
will be paid or the frequency of such payments.
Ongoing maintenance of effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
could cause us to incur additional expenditures of time and financial resources.
We regularly document and test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls
over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm on our controls over
financial reporting. If, in the future, we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls and, as such standards
are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an
ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could cause us to
incur substantial expenditures of management time and financial resources to identify and correct any such failure.
Additionally, the failure to comply with Section 404 or the report by us of a “material weakness” may cause
investors to lose confidence in our financial statements and our stock price may be adversely affected. A “material
weakness” is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will
not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. If we fail to remedy any material weakness, our financial statements
may be inaccurate, we may face restricted access to the capital markets, and our stock price may decline.
Product liability claims and litigation could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Product liability is a significant commercial risk. Substantial damage awards have been made in certain jurisdictions
against manufacturers and resellers based upon claims for injuries caused by the use of or exposure to various
products. There can be no assurance that product liability claims against us would not have a material adverse effect
on our business or results of operations. Failure of our products to meet required specifications could result in
product liability claims from our shippers and customers arising from contaminated or off-specification commingled
pipelines and storage tanks and/or defective quality fuels.
If the market value of our inventory declines to an amount less than our LIFO basis, we would record a write-
down of inventory and a non-cash charge to cost of sales, which would adversely affect our earnings.
The nature of our business requires us to maintain substantial quantities of crude oil, refined petroleum product and
blendstock inventories. Because crude oil and refined petroleum products are commodities, we have no control over
the changing market value of these inventories. Because certain of our refining inventory is valued at the lower of
cost or market value under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) inventory valuation methodology, we would record a write-
down of inventory and a non-cash charge to cost of sales if the market value of our inventory were to decline to an
amount less than our LIFO basis. A material write-down could affect our operating income and profitability.
From time to time, our cash needs may exceed our internally generated cash flow, and our business could be
materially and adversely affected if we are not able to obtain the necessary funds from financing activities.
-33-
We have significant short-term cash needs to satisfy working capital requirements such as crude oil purchases which
fluctuate with the pricing and sourcing of crude oil.
We generally purchase crude oil for our refineries with cash generated from our operations. If the price of crude oil
increases significantly, we may not have sufficient cash flow, available cash on hand or borrowing capacity, and
may not be able to sufficiently increase borrowing capacity, under our existing credit facilities to purchase enough
crude oil to operate our refineries at desired capacity. Our failure to operate our refineries at desired capacity could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also have
significant long-term needs for cash, including those to support our expansion and upgrade plans, as well as for
regulatory compliance. If credit markets tighten, it may become more difficult to obtain cash from third party
sources. If we cannot generate cash flow or otherwise secure sufficient liquidity to support our short-term and long-
term capital requirements, we may not be able to comply with regulatory deadlines or pursue our business strategies,
in which case our operations may not perform as well as we currently expect, and we could be subject to regulatory
action.
Changes in our credit profile, or a significant increase in the price of crude oil, may affect our relationship with
our suppliers, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and limit our ability to purchase
enough crude oil to operate our refineries at desired capacity.
An unfavorable credit profile, or a significant increase in the price of crude oil, could affect the way crude oil
suppliers view our ability to make payments and induce them to shorten the payment terms of their invoices with us
or require credit enhancement. Due to the large dollar amounts and volume of our crude oil and other feedstock
purchases, any imposition by our suppliers of more burdensome payment terms or credit enhancement requirements
on us may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and our ability to make payments to our suppliers. This in
turn could cause us to be unable to operate our refineries at desired capacity. A failure to operate our refineries at
desired capacity could adversely affect our profitability and cash flow.
Our debt agreements contain operating and financial restrictions that might constrain our business and
financing activities.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our credit facilities and any future financing agreements
could adversely affect our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our
business activities. For example, our revolving credit facility imposes usual and customary requirements for this
type of credit facility, including: (i) maintenance of certain levels of the fixed charge coverage ratio; (ii) limitations
on liens, investments, indebtedness and dividends; (iii) a prohibition on changes in control and (iv) restrictions on
engaging in mergers, consolidations and sales of assets, entering into certain lease obligations, and making certain
investments or capital expenditures. If we fail to satisfy the covenants set forth in the credit facility or another event
of default occurs under the facility, the maturity of the loan could be accelerated or we could be prohibited from
borrowing for our future working capital needs and issuing letters of credit. We might not have, or be able to obtain,
sufficient funds to make these immediate payments. Should we desire to undertake a transaction that is prohibited
by the covenants in our credit facilities, we will need to obtain consent under our credit facilities. Such refinancing
may not be possible or may not be available on commercially acceptable terms. In addition, our obligations under
our credit facilities are secured by inventory, receivables and pledged cash assets. If we are unable to repay our
indebtedness under our credit facilities when due, the lenders could seek to foreclose on the assets or we may be
required to contribute additional capital to our subsidiaries. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business may suffer due to a change in the composition of our Board of Directors, or if any of our key senior
executives or other key employees discontinue employment with us. Furthermore, a shortage of skilled labor or
disruptions in our labor force may make it difficult for us to maintain labor productivity.
Our future performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our senior management
team and key technical personnel. We do not currently maintain key man life insurance, non-compete agreements, or
employment agreements with respect to any member of our senior management team. The loss or unavailability to
us of any member of our senior management team or a key technical employee could significantly harm us. We face
-34-
competition for these professionals from our competitors, our customers and other companies operating in our
industry. To the extent that the services of members of our senior management team and key technical personnel
would be unavailable to us for any reason, we may be required to hire other personnel to manage and operate our
company. We may not be able to locate or employ such qualified personnel on acceptable terms, or at all.
Furthermore, our operations require skilled and experienced laborers with proficiency in multiple tasks. A shortage
of trained workers due to retirements or otherwise could have an adverse impact on our labor productivity and costs
and our ability to expand production in the event there is an increase in the demand for our products and services,
which could adversely affect our operations.
As of December 31, 2011, approximately 33% of our employees were represented by labor unions under collective
bargaining agreements with various expiration dates. We may not be able to renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements when they expire on satisfactory terms or at all. A failure to do so may increase our costs. In addition,
our existing labor agreements may not prevent a strike or work stoppage at any of our facilities in the future, and any
work stoppage could negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We may need to use current cash flow to fund our postretirement health care obligations, which could have a
significant adverse effect on our financial position.
We also have benefit obligations in connection with our unfunded postretirement health care plans that provide
health care benefits as part of the voluntary early retirement program offered to eligible employees. As part of the
early retirement program, we allow qualified retiring employees to continue coverage at a reduced cost under our
group medical plans until normal retirement age. Additionally, we maintain an unfunded postretirement medical
plan whereby certain retirees between the ages of 62 and 65 can receive benefits paid by us. As of December 31,
2011, the total accumulated postretirement benefit obligation under our postretirement medical plans was $77.3
million. Increased participation in this program and/or increasing medical costs may affect our ability to pay
required health care benefits causing us to have to divert funds away from other areas of the business to pay their
costs.
We could be subject to damages based on claims brought against us by our customers or lose customers as a
result of the failure of our products to meet certain quality specifications.
A significant portion of our operating responsibility on refined product pipelines is to insure the quality and purity of
the products loaded at our loading racks. If our quality control measures were to fail, off specification product could
be sent out to public gasoline stations. This type of incident could result in liability claims regarding damages
caused by the off specification fuel or could impact our ability to retain existing customers or to acquire new
customers, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flows.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
We do not have any unresolved staff comments.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Commitment and Contingency Reserves
We periodically establish reserves for certain legal proceedings. The establishment of a reserve involves an
estimation process that includes the advice of legal counsel and subjective judgment of management. While
management believes these reserves to be adequate, future changes in the facts and circumstances could result in the
actual liability exceeding the estimated ranges of loss and amounts accrued.
While the outcome and impact on us cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the resolution of
these proceedings through settlement or adverse judgment will not have a material adverse effect on our
-35-
consolidated financial position or cash flow. Operating results, however, could be significantly impacted in the
reporting periods in which such matters are resolved.
Cut Bank Hill Environmental Claims
Prior to the sale by Holly Corporation of the Montana Refining Company (“MRC”) assets in 2006, MRC (along
with other companies) was the subject of several environmental claims at the Cut Bank Hill site in Montana. These
claims include: (1) a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) administrative order requiring MRC and other
companies to undertake cleanup actions; (2) a U.S. Coast Guard claim against MRC and other companies for
response costs of $0.3 million in connection with its cleanup efforts at the Cut Bank Hill site; and (3) a unilateral
order by the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) directing MRC and other companies to
complete a remedial investigation and a request by the MDEQ that MRC and other companies pay $0.2 million to
reimburse the State’s costs for remedial actions. MRC has denied responsibility for the requested EPA order and the
MDEQ cleanup actions and the MDEQ and Coast Guard response costs, but has accepted an invitation by the other
companies to participate in the group based on an allocation of approximately 10 percent of the group’s past and
ongoing investigation and other costs. This matter is no longer considered to be material based upon information
currently available to the Company and will not be disclosed in future SEC filings.
Navajo Tank Fire
On March 2, 2010, a tank caught fire while under construction. At the time of the incident, four individuals were
working on top of the tank. These individuals were all employees of a third-party contractor who was placing
insulation on the tank. Two individuals sustained injuries and two individuals died as a result of the incident. Two
wrongful death lawsuits and two personal injury lawsuits seeking damages, including punitive damages, were filed
on behalf of the estates of the two deceased workers and on behalf of the two survivors in state court in Dallas
County, Texas (two lawsuits) and state court in Eddy County, New Mexico (two lawsuits). A confidential settlement
was reached in the two Texas cases, and the cases have been dismissed. Agreements have been reached for the
settlement of the New Mexico cases, and those agreements are being documented. It is anticipated that the New
Mexico cases will be dismissed shortly. These cases will no longer be reported in our SEC filings since they are not
expected to be material due to our insurance coverage.
New Mexico OHSB Complaint – Navajo Tank Fire
On March 3, 2010, the New Mexico Occupational Health and Safety Bureau (“OHSB”), the New Mexico regulatory
agency responsible for enforcing certain state occupational health and safety regulations, which are identical to
Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) regulations, commenced an inspection in relation
to the tank fire that took place on March 2, 2010 at the Navajo facility in Artesia, New Mexico. On August 31, 2010,
OHSB issued two citations to Navajo, alleging 10 willful violations and one serious violation of various construction
safety standards. OHSB proposed penalties in the amount of $0.7 million. Navajo filed a notice of contest,
challenging the citations. The parties commenced settlement negotiations but were unable to reach an agreement,
thus OHSB filed an administrative complaint with New Mexico Occupational Health and Safety Review
Commission (“OHSRC”) on December 20, 2010. Discovery is under way at this time. Due to the complexity of the
case and a recent substitution of counsel for New Mexico, OHSRC recently extended the schedule in this matter,
setting the hearing to begin no sooner than January 2013.
Discharge Permit Appeal – Tulsa West Facility
HRM-Tulsa is party to parallel Oklahoma administrative and state district court proceedings involving a challenge to
the terms of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (“ODEQ”) permit that governs the discharge of
industrial wastewater from our Tulsa West facility. Pursuant to a settlement agreement between HRM -Tulsa and
ODEQ, both proceedings have been stayed to allow ODEQ to issue a revised permit that modifies the existing
permit’s requirements for toxicity testing and for managing storm flows. The parties are now in discussions
regarding the appropriate changes in the permit language to accomplish these modifications. Once agreed-upon
revisions are made and become effective, both proceedings will be dismissed. This matter is no longer considered to
be material based upon information currently available to the Company and will not be disclosed in future SEC
filings.
-36-
Benzene Waste Operations Regulatory Proceedings – Tulsa East and West Facilities
On July 13, 2011, the EPA issued a determination that HRM - Tulsa’s two refineries should be considered a single
facility for purposes of a particular Clean Air Act regulation, the Benzene Waste Operations NESHAP. As a single
facility, the refineries’ emissions would be combined for purposes of assessing whether they were exceeding the
relevant regulatory threshold. We disagreed with this interpretation, however, and appealed the matter to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Shortly thereafter, the EPA withdrew its letter. In response, we dismissed the
appeal. At this time, no further proceedings are expected.
Litigation Related to the Merger with Frontier Oil Corporation
Twelve substantially similar shareholder lawsuits styled as class actions were filed by purported Frontier
shareholders challenging our proposed “merger of equals” with Frontier and naming as defendants Frontier, its
board of directors and, in certain instances, Holly and our wholly owned subsidiary, North Acquisition, Inc., as
aiders and abettors. To date, such shareholder actions remain pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Texas, and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. One case filed in Laramie County,
Wyoming was dismissed without prejudice. Final judgment was entered by the Court in the consolidated Harris
County, Texas cases on January 6, 2012, dismissing with prejudice all claims made by the class members.
These lawsuits generally allege that (1) the consideration received by Frontier’s shareholders in the merger was
inadequate, (2) the Frontier directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, approving the merger at
an inadequate price under circumstances involving certain alleged conflicts of interest, (3) the merger agreement
includes preclusive deal protection provisions, and (4) Frontier, and in some cases we and North Acquisition, Inc.,
aided and abetted Frontier’s directors in breaching their fiduciary duties to Frontier’s shareholders. In the three
federal court cases discussed more fully below, we and/or North Acquisition, Inc. were also alleged to have violated
Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934 by soliciting proxies based on an allegedly false and/or
misleading proxy statement concerning the merger.
The eight lawsuits filed in the District Courts of Harris County, Texas (the “Texas State Court Lawsuits”) were
consolidated on March 25, 2011, under the caption: In re Frontier Oil Corporation, Cause No. 2011-11451 (first case
filed February 22, 2011), and Interim Class Counsel was appointed on April 12, 2011. On September 12, 2011, the
lead plaintiff and the defendants in the Texas State Court Lawsuits submitted a Stipulation and Agreement of
Settlement to the Court for preliminary approval. Pursuant to that agreement, the actions were stayed and certain
additional disclosures were made to Frontier’s shareholders on June 20, 2011. After a hearing on October 7, 2011,
the Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement and scheduled a final settlement hearing for January 6,
2012. On January 6, 2012, the Court approved a settlement and certified an opt-out class action, dismissed with
prejudice all claims released by the terms of the settlement, and awarded attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of
$612,500 to counsel for the lead plaintiffs. Shareholders who objected to the settlement may appeal the Court’s
decision to overrule their objections. On January 19, 2012, one shareholder, whose objection related solely to the
award of attorneys’ fees, filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law and a motion for new trial.
Generally, in the event that the order is reversed or modified on appeal, counsel for the lead plaintiffs shall refund
the fee award consistent with such reversal or modification.
The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas is styled Angelo Chiarelli v. Holly
Corporation, et al. (filed on March 2, 2011). On June 29, 2011, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, and one
month later, the parties filed an agreed motion to stay the case so that the proposed settlement in the Texas State
Court Lawsuits could be considered and resolved by the state court. The motion to stay was granted on August 8,
2011. On January 30, 2012, the parties filed a joint report informing the Court that the settlement in the Texas State
Court Lawsuits had been approved and entered, that all claims in the Texas State Court Lawsuits had been
dismissed, and that Chiarelli neither objected to the settlement nor opted out of the class.
The two remaining lawsuits filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas are consolidated under
the caption: Tim Wilcox v. Frontier Oil Corporation, et al. (first case filed on March 7, 2011). We and our wholly
owned subsidiary moved to dismiss the amended complaint on April 21, 2011, and the other defendants moved for
dismissal in July after they were served. On June 24, 2011, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary
restraining order and preliminary injunction to enjoin the proposed merger and prevent Frontier’s shareholders from
voting on it. On August 9, 2011, the defendants filed an unopposed motion to stay the consolidated case in light of
the proposed settlement of the Texas State Court Lawsuits. On November 29, 2011, the court granted defendants’
-37-
unopposed motion to stay and ordered the parties to file a report on the status of the proposed settlement of the
Texas State Court Lawsuits by January 13, 2012. That same day, the court denied defendants’ motions to dismiss
without prejudice to refile. On January 13, 2012, the parties filed a joint report informing the Court that the
settlement in the Texas State Court Lawsuits had been approved and entered and that all claims in the Texas State
Court Lawsuits had been dismissed.
Due to recent developments we no longer believe these matters are material and, accordingly, they will not be
disclosed in future SEC filings.
Unclaimed Property Audits
A multi-state audit of legacy Holly Corporation’s unclaimed property compliance and reporting is being conducted
by Kelmar Associates, LLC on behalf of eleven states. We are currently in the fourth year of this ongoing audit that
covers the period 1981 – 2004. It is not yet possible to accurately estimate the amount, if any, that is owed to each of
the states.
A similar multi-state audit of legacy Frontier Oil Corporation’s unclaimed property compliance and reporting is also
being conducted by Kelmar Associates, LLC on behalf of five states. The audit work began in December 2011. It is
not yet possible to accurately estimate the amount, if any, that might be owed to each of the states participating in
this audit.
We have determined that these audits are not material to the Company so they will no longer be reported in our SEC
filings.
Other
We are a party to various other litigation and proceedings that we believe, based on advice of counsel, will not either
individually or in the aggregate have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
-38-
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HFC.” The following
table sets forth the range of the daily high and low sales prices per share of common stock, dividends declared per
share and the trading volume of common stock for the periods indicated:
Years Ended December 31,
High
Low
Dividends
Trading
Volume
2011
Fourth quarter ..............................................................................
Third quarter ................................................................................
Second quarter .............................................................................
First quarter .................................................................................
$ 35.00
$ 38.90
$ 34.94
$ 31.61
$ 21.13
$ 24.25
$ 25.30
$ 19.92
$ 0.600
$ 0.588
$ 0.075
$ 0.075
243,985,000
261,573,400
212,391,800
149,825,800
2010
Fourth quarter ..............................................................................
Third quarter ................................................................................
Second quarter .............................................................................
First quarter .................................................................................
$ 20.69
$ 14.93
$ 15.29
$ 15.43
$ 14.10
$ 12.18
$ 11.66
$ 12.57
$ 0.075
$ 0.075
$ 0.075
$ 0.075
73,805,800
74,987,200
126,628,400
95,424,800
On August 3, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split, payable in the form of a common
stock dividend for each issued and outstanding share of our common stock. The stock dividend was paid August 31,
2011 to all shareholders of record on August 24, 2011. All references to share and per share amounts in this
document and related disclosures have been adjusted to reflect the effect of the stock split for all periods presented.
Under our common stock repurchase program repurchases are being made from time to time in the open market or
privately negotiated transactions based on market conditions, securities law limitations and other factors. The
following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2011.
Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
under Approved
Stock Repurchase
Program
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
Total
125,523
-
-
125,523
$
$
$
26.63
-
-
586,123
-
-
586,123
Maximum Dollar
Value of Shares
Yet to be
Purchased under
Approved Stock
Repurchase
Program
$ 82,156,066
$ 82,156,066
$ 82,156,066
Additionally during the three months ended December 31, 2011, we withheld 18,322 shares of our common stock
from certain executives and employees in the amount of $0.5 million. These withholdings were made under the
terms of our share-based compensation unit agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income
taxes due at vesting in the case of officers and employees who did not elect to satisfy such taxes by other means.
As of February 16, 2012, we had approximately 48,000 stockholders, including beneficial owners holding shares in
street name.
We intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis, although there is no assurance as to future
dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings, capital requirements, our financial condition and other
factors. Our credit agreement and senior notes limit the payment of dividends. See Note 13 in the “Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements” under Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
-39-
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table shows our selected financial information as of the dates or for the periods indicated. This table
should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2011
2010
Years Ended December 31,
2009
(In thousands, except per share data)
2008
FINANCIAL DATA(1)(2)
For the period
Sales and other revenues
Income from continuing operations before income taxes ..................
Income tax provision ..........................................................................
Income from continuing operations ...................................................
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(3) ........................
Net income .........................................................................................
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest .....................
$ 15,439,528
1,641,695
581,991
1,059,704
-
1,059,704
36,307
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ..................... $
Earnings per share attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders –
basic ................................................................................................ $
Earnings per share attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders –
diluted ............................................................................................. $
Cash dividends declared per common share ...................................... $
Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic ..............................................................................................
Diluted ............................................................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities .......................................... $
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities .......................... $
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities ......................... $
1,023,397
6.46
6.42
1.34
158,486
159,294
1,338,391
228,494
(217,082)
At end of period
1,840,610
Cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities .... $
Working capital .................................................................................. $
2,030,063
Total assets ......................................................................................... $ 10,314,621
Total debt, including short-term(4) ...................................................... $
1,214,742
5,835,900
Total equity ........................................................................................ $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,322,929
192,363
59,312
133,051
-
133,051
29,087
103,964
0.98
0.97
0.30
106,436
107,218
283,255
(213,232)
34,482
230,444
313,580
3,701,475
810,561
1,288,139
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,834,268
43,803
7,460
36,343
16,926
53,269
33,736
19,533
0.20
0.20
0.30
100,836
101,206
211,545
(534,603)
406,849
125,819
257,899
3,145,939
707,458
1,207,781
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2007
4,791,742
499,444
165,316
334,128
-
334,128
-
334,128
3.05
2.99
0.23
5,860,357
187,746
64,028
123,718
2,918
126,636
6,078
120,558
1.20
1.19
0.30
$
$
$
$
$
100,404
101,098
155,490
$
(57,777) $
(151,277) $
109,704
111,700
422,737
(293,057)
(189,428)
94,447
68,465
1,874,225
370,914
936,332
$
$
$
$
$
329,784
216,541
1,663,945
-
602,127
(1) We merged with Frontier effective July 1, 2011. Our consolidated financial and operating results reflect the operations of the merged
Frontier businesses beginning July 1, 2011. See “Company Overview” under Items 1 and 2, “Business and Properties” for
information on our merger.
(2) We reconsolidated HEP effective March 1, 2008 and include the consolidated results of HEP in our financial statements. For the
period from July 1, 2005 through February 29, 2008, we accounted for our investment in HEP under the equity method of accounting
whereby we recorded our pro-rata share of earnings in HEP and contributions to and distributions from HEP were recorded as
adjustments to our investment balance. See “Company Overview” under Items 1 and 2, “Business and Properties” for information
regarding our reconsolidation of HEP effective March 1, 2008.
(3) On December 1, 2009, HEP sold its 70% interest in Rio Grande. Results of operations of Rio Grande that were previously reported in
(4)
operations are presented in discontinued operations.
Includes total HEP debt of $525.9 million, $482.3 million, $379.2 million and $370.9 million, respectively, which is non-recourse to
HollyFrontier.
-40-
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Item 7 contains “forward-looking” statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. In this document, the words “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” refer only to HollyFrontier
and its consolidated subsidiaries or to HollyFrontier or an individual subsidiary and not to any other person with
certain exceptions. Generally, the words “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” include HEP and its subsidiaries as
consolidated subsidiaries of HollyFrontier, unless when used in disclosures of transactions or obligations between
HEP and HollyFrontier or its other subsidiaries. This document contains certain disclosures of agreements that are
specific to HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries and do not necessarily represent obligations of HollyFrontier.
When used in descriptions of agreements and transactions, “HEP” refers to HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We merged with Frontier effective July 1, 2011. Accordingly, this document includes Frontier, its consolidated
subsidiaries and the operations of the merged Frontier businesses effective July 1, 2011, but not prior to this date.
OVERVIEW
We are principally an independent petroleum refiner that produces high-value refined products such as gasoline,
diesel fuel, jet fuel, specialty lubricant products, and specialty and modified asphalt. We operate five refineries
having a combined crude oil processing capacity of 443,000 barrels per day that serve markets throughout the Mid-
Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States. Our refineries are located in El Dorado,
Kansas, (the El Dorado Refinery), Tulsa, Oklahoma (the Tulsa Refineries) which comprise two production facilities,
the Tulsa West and East facilities, a petroleum refinery in Artesia, New Mexico, which operates in conjunction with
crude, vacuum distillation and other facilities situated 65 miles away in Lovington, New Mexico (the Navajo
Refinery), Cheyenne, Wyoming (the Cheyenne Refinery) and Woods Cross, Utah (the Woods Cross Refinery).
On February 21, 2011, we entered into a merger agreement providing for a “merger of equals” business combination
between us and Frontier. On July 1, 2011, North Acquisition, Inc. a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Holly
merged with and into Frontier, with Frontier surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holly. Concurrent with the
merger, we changed our name to HollyFrontier Corporation and changed the ticker symbol for our common stock
traded on the New York Stock Exchange to “HFC.” Subsequent to the merger and following approval by the post-
closing board of directors of HollyFrontier, Frontier merged with and into HollyFrontier, with HollyFrontier
continuing as the surviving corporation. This merger combined the legacy Frontier refinery operations, the El
Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries, with Holly’s legacy refinery operations to form HollyFrontier.
In accordance with the merger agreement, we issued approximately 102.8 million shares of HollyFrontier common
stock in exchange for outstanding shares of Frontier common stock to former Frontier stockholders. Each
outstanding share of Frontier common stock was converted into 0.4811 shares of HollyFrontier common stock with
any fractional shares paid in cash. The aggregate equity consideration paid in connection with the merger was $3.7
billion. This is based on our July 1, 2011 market closing price of $35.93 and includes a portion of the fair value of
the outstanding equity-based awards assumed from Frontier that relates to pre-merger services.
On August 3, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split, payable in the form of a common
stock dividend for each issued and outstanding share of our common stock. The stock dividend was paid August 31,
2011 to all shareholders of record on August 24, 2011. All references to share and per share amounts in this
document and related disclosures have been adjusted to reflect the effect of the stock split for all periods presented.
In June 2009, we acquired the Tulsa West facility, an 85,000 BPSD refinery located in Tulsa, Oklahoma from
Sunoco and in December 2009, acquired the Tulsa East facility, a 75,000 BPSD refinery from Sinclair also located
in Tulsa, Oklahoma. We have integrated certain operations of the Tulsa Refineries, resulting in a combined crude
processing rate of 125,000 BPSD.
Sales and other revenues and net income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders were $15,439.5 million and
$1,023.4 million, $8,322.9 million and $104 million, and $4,834.3 million and $19.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our principal expenses are costs of products sold and operating
expenses. Our total operating costs and expenses were $13,708 million, $8,059.9 million and $4,754 million for the
years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
-41-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Financial Data
2011(1)
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands, except per share data)
2009(2)
Sales and other revenues ...................................................................................................
$ 15,439,528
$
8,322,929
$
4,834,268
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) ............................
Operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) ...............................
General and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation
and amortization) ......................................................................................................
Depreciation and amortization ......................................................................................
Total operating costs and expenses ..........................................................................
Income from operations .....................................................................................................
Other income (expense):
Earnings of equity method investments ........................................................................
Interest income ..............................................................................................................
Interest expense .............................................................................................................
Merger transaction costs ...............................................................................................
Acquisition costs – Tulsa refineries ..............................................................................
Income from continuing operations before income taxes .................................................
Income tax provision .........................................................................................................
Income from continuing operations ..................................................................................
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes(3) .......................................................
Net income .........................................................................................................................
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest ....................................................
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ....................................................
Earnings attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders:
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
Income from discontinued operations ..........................................................................
Net income ....................................................................................................................
Earnings per share attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders – basic:
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
Income from discontinued operations ..........................................................................
Net income ....................................................................................................................
Earnings per share attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders – diluted:
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
Income from discontinued operations ..........................................................................
Net income ....................................................................................................................
Cash dividends declared per common share .....................................................................
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12,680,078
748,081
120,114
159,707
13,707,980
1,731,548
2,300
1,284
(78,323)
(15,114)
-
(89,853)
1,641,695
581,991
1,059,704
-
1,059,704
36,307
1,023,397
1,023,397
-
1,023,397
6.46
-
6.46
6.42
-
6.42
1.34
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,367,149
504,414
70,839
117,529
8,059,931
262,998
2,393
1,168
(74,196)
-
-
(70,635)
192,363
59,312
133,051
-
133,051
29,087
103,964
103,964
-
103,964
0.98
-
0.98
0.97
-
0.97
0.30
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,238,008
356,855
60,343
98,751
4,753,957
80,311
1,919
5,045
(40,346)
-
(3,126)
(36,508)
43,803
7,460
36,343
16,926
53,269
33,736
19,533
15,209
4,324
19,533
0.15
0.05
0.20
0.15
0.05
0.20
0.30
Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic ..............................................................................................................................
Diluted ...........................................................................................................................
158,486
159,294
106,436
107,218
100,836
101,206
(1) Effective July 1, 2011, our consolidated financial and operating results reflect the operations of the merged Frontier
businesses. Assuming the merger had been consummated on January 1, 2010, pro forma revenues and net income are as
follows:
Year Ended December 31,
2010
2011
(In thousands)
Sales and other revenues ..................................................................................
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ...................................
$ 19,418,709
1,335,257
$
$ 14,207,835
179,979
$
(2) We acquired the Tulsa Refineries in 2009. Our consolidated financial and operating results reflect the operations of the
Tulsa West facility effective June 1, 2009 and the Tulsa East facility effective December 1, 2009.
(3) On December 1, 2009, HEP sold its 70% interest in Rio Grande. Results of operations of Rio Grande are presented in
discontinued operations.
-42-
Balance Sheet Data
December 31,
2011
2010
(In thousands)
Cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities ...........................................
Working capital ......................................................................................................................
Total assets .............................................................................................................................
Long-term debt – HollyFrontier Corporation ..........................................................................
Long-term debt – Holly Energy Partners ................................................................................
Total equity .............................................................................................................................
$ 1,840,610
$
2,030,063
$ 10,314,621
688,882
$
525,860
$
5,835,900
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
230,444
313,580
3,701,475
328,290
482,271
1,288,139
Other Financial Data
2011
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
2009
Net cash provided by operating activities ......................................................
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities ......................................
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities ......................................
Capital expenditures ......................................................................................
EBITDA from continuing operations(1) .........................................................
$ 1,338,391
228,494
$
(217,082)
$
$
374,241
$ 1,842,134
$
283,255
$ (213,232)
34,482
$
213,232
$
353,833
$
$
211,545
$ (534,603)
406,849
$
302,551
$
156,721
$
(1) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which we refer to as “EBITDA”, is calculated as net
income plus (i) interest expense, net of interest income, (ii) income tax provision, and (iii) depreciation and
amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation provided for under GAAP; however, the amounts included in the EBITDA
calculation are derived from amounts included in our consolidated financial statements. EBITDA should not be
considered as an alternative to net income or operating income as an indication of our operating performance or as an
alternative to operating cash flow as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled
measures of other companies. EBITDA is presented here because it is a widely used financial indicator used by
investors and analysts to measure performance. EBITDA is also used by our management for internal analysis and as a
basis for financial covenants. EBITDA presented above is reconciled to net income under “Reconciliations to Amounts
Reported Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” following Item 7A of Part II of this Form 10-K.
Our operations are currently organized into two reportable segments, Refining and HEP. Our operations that are not
included in the Refining and HEP segments are included in Corporate and Other. Intersegment transactions are
eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and are included in Eliminations.
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Sales and other revenues
Refining(1) .................................................................................................. $ 15,392,430
HEP(2) ........................................................................................................
213,566
1,247
Corporate and other ...................................................................................
Eliminations ...............................................................................................
(167,715)
Consolidated .............................................................................................. $ 15,439,528
$ 8,287,000
182,114
415
(146,600)
$ 8,322,929
$ 4,789,821
146,561
(636)
(101,478)
$ 4,834,268
(In thousands)
Operating income (loss)
Refining(1) .................................................................................................. $ 1,739,068
HEP(2) ........................................................................................................
113,258
(120,833)
Corporate and other ...................................................................................
55
Eliminations ...............................................................................................
Consolidated .............................................................................................. $ 1,731,548
$
$
242,466
92,386
(69,654)
(2,200)
262,998
$
$
71,281
70,373
(60,239)
(1,104)
80,311
(1) The Refining segment includes the operations of our El Dorado, Tulsa, Navajo, Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries
and NK Asphalt and involves the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and branded marketing of refined
products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, specialty lubricant products, and specialty and modified asphalt. The
petroleum products are primarily marketed in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United
States and northern Mexico. Additionally, specialty lubricant products produced at our Tulsa West facility are
-43-
marketed throughout North America and are distributed in Central and South America. NK Asphalt manufactures and
markets asphalt and asphalt products in Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Kansas, Missouri, Texas and northern
Mexico.
(2) The HEP segment involves all of the operations of HEP effective March 1, 2008 (date of reconsolidation). HEP owns
and operates logistic assets consisting of petroleum product and crude oil pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading
rack facilities in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States. Revenues are
generated by charging tariffs for transporting petroleum products and crude oil through its pipelines and by charging
fees for terminalling petroleum products and other hydrocarbons, and storing and providing other services at its storage
tanks and terminals. Additionally, HEP owns a 25% interest in the SLC Pipeline that serves refineries in the Salt Lake
City, Utah area. Revenues from the HEP segment are earned through transactions with unaffiliated parties for pipeline
transportation, rental and terminalling operations as well as revenues relating to pipeline transportation services
provided for our refining operations.
Refining Operating Data
Our refinery operations include the El Dorado, Tulsa, Navajo, Cheyenne and Woods Cross Refineries. The
following tables set forth information, including non-GAAP performance measures about our consolidated refinery
operations. The cost of products and refinery gross margin do not include the effect of depreciation and
amortization. Reconciliations to amounts reported under GAAP are provided under “Reconciliations to Amounts
Reported Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” following Item 7A of Part II of this Form 10-K.
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009 (11)
2011(10)
Consolidated
Crude charge (BPD) (1) ....................................................................................
Refinery throughput (BPD) (2) .........................................................................
Refinery production (BPD) (3) ........................................................................
Sales of produced refined products (BPD) ......................................................
Sales of refined products (BPD) (4) ..................................................................
315,000
340,200
331,890
332,720
340,630
221,440
234,910
225,980
228,140
232,100
142,430
154,940
151,420
151,580
155,820
Refinery utilization (5) ......................................................................................
89.9%
86.5%
78.9%
Average per produced barrel (6)
Net sales .....................................................................................................
Cost of products (7) .....................................................................................
Refinery gross margin ................................................................................
Refinery operating expenses (8) ..................................................................
Net operating margin .................................................................................
$ 118.82
98.18
20.64
5.36
$ 15.28
$ 91.06
82.27
8.79
5.08
3.71
$
$ 74.06
66.85
7.21
5.24
1.97
$
Refinery operating expenses per throughput barrel (9) .....................................
$
5.24
$
4.94
$
5.12
(1) Crude charge represents the barrels per day of crude oil processed at our refineries.
(2) Refinery throughput represents the barrels per day of crude and other refinery feedstocks input to the crude units and
other conversion units at our refineries.
(3) Refinery production represents the barrels per day of refined products yielded from processing crude and other refinery
feedstocks through the crude units and other conversion units at our refineries.
(4) Includes refined products purchased for resale.
(5) Represents crude charge divided by total crude capacity (BPSD). During 2009, we increased our consolidated crude
capacity by 15,000 BPSD effective April 1, 2009 (our Navajo Refinery expansion), by 85,000 BPSD effective June 1,
2009 (our Tulsa West facility acquisition) and by 40,000 BPSD effective December 1, 2009 (our Tulsa East facility
acquisition), increasing our consolidated crude capacity to 256,000 BPSD. As a result of our merger effective July 1,
2011 we increased our crude capacity by 135,000 BPSD with the El Dorado Refinery and by 52,000 with the addition
of our Cheyenne Refinery for a consolidated total of 443,000 BPSD.
(6) Represents average per barrel amount for produced refined products sold, which is a non-GAAP measure.
Reconciliations to amounts reported under GAAP are provided under “Reconciliations to Amounts Reported Under
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” following Item 7A of Part II of this Form 10-K.
(7) Transportation costs billed from HEP are included in cost of products.
(8) Represents operating expenses of the refineries, exclusive of depreciation and amortization.
(9) Represents refinery operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization, divided by refinery throughput.
-44-
(10) Refining operating data for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes crude oil processed and products yielded from
the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries for the period from July 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 only, and averaged
over the 365 days for the year ended December 31, 2011.
(11) Refining operating data for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes crude oil processed and products yielded from
the Tulsa Refineries for the period from June 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 only, and averaged over the 365 days
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
Summary
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier Corporation stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2011 was
$1,023.4 million ($6.46 per basic and $6.42 per diluted share) a $919.4 million increase compared to $104 million
($0.98 per basic and $0.97 per diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2010. Net income increased due
principally to earnings attributable to the merged Frontier business operations (principally, El Dorado and Cheyenne
Refineries) which are included in our results beginning July 1, 2011, and due to significantly higher refinery gross
margins during 2011. Overall refinery gross margins for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $20.64 per
produced barrel compared to $8.79 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Overall production levels for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by 47% over 2010 due to the inclusion of
the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refinery operations following our merger with Frontier effective July 1, 2011.
Sales and Other Revenues
Sales and other revenues from continuing operations increased 86% from $8,322.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 to $15,439.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, due principally to the inclusion of
$4,183.8 million in revenues attributable to the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refinery operations and the effects of
increased refined product sales prices over the prior year. The average sales price we received per produced barrel
sold increased 30% from $91.06 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $118.82 for the year ended December 31,
2011. Sales and other revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, include $46.4 million and $36
million, respectively, in HEP revenues attributable to pipeline and transportation services provided to unaffiliated
parties.
Cost of Products Sold
Cost of products sold increased 72% from $7,367.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $12,680.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2011, due principally to the inclusion of results from the El Dorado and
Cheyenne Refinery operations, and due to higher crude oil costs. The average price we paid per barrel of crude oil
and feedstocks used in production and the transportation costs of moving the finished products to the market place
increased 19% from $82.27 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $98.18 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Gross Refinery Margins
Gross refining margin per produced barrel increased 135% from $8.79 for the year ended December 31, 2010 to
$20.64 for the year ended December 31, 2011, due to an increase in the average sales price we received per
produced barrel sold, partially offset by an increase in the average price we paid per produced barrel of crude oil and
feedstocks. Gross refining margin does not include the effects of depreciation or amortization. See “Reconciliations
to Amounts Reported Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” following Item 7A of Part II of this Form
10-K for a reconciliation to the income statement of prices of refined products sold and costs of products purchased.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization increased 48% from $504.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010 to $748.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, due principally to costs
attributable to the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refinery operations. Also contributing to a much lesser extent were
increased payroll and maintenance costs attributable to the legacy Holly refining operations. For the years ended
December 2011 and 2010, operating expenses include $61.7 million and $52.4 million, respectively, in costs
attributable to HEP operations.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased 70% from $70.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to
$120.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This includes $26.5 million in integration and severance costs
-45-
associated with the merger integration. It also reflects higher payroll, equity based compensation costs and support
costs for our larger organization. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, general and administrative
expenses include $4.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively, in costs attributable to HEP operations.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased 36% from $117.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $159.7
million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was due principally to depreciation and amortization
attributable to the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refinery operations and capitalized improvement projects. For the years
ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, depreciation and amortization expenses include $31.5 million and $29.1
million, respectively, in costs attributable to HEP operations.
Interest Income
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $1.3 million compared to $1.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2011, interest income reflects higher cash investment levels
in 2011. Additionally, interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects interest received on income
tax refunds.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $78.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $74.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010. This increase reflects the write-off of $5 million of previously deferred financing costs
due to the July 1, 2011 termination of our previous credit agreement and the inclusion of interest attributable to the
senior notes assumed upon our merger with Frontier. Additionally, during 2011 we capitalized $17.2 million in
interest attributable to construction projects. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, interest expense
included $38.2 million and $36.3 million, respectively, in costs attributable to HEP operations.
Merger Transaction Costs
For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized merger transaction costs of $15.1 million related to our
merger with Frontier effective July 1, 2011. These costs relate to legal, advisory and other professional fees that are
directly attributable to the merger.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased from $59.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $582 million for the year ended
December 31, 2011 due to significantly higher pre-tax earnings for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to
2010. Our effective tax rate, before consideration of earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests was 35.5% for
the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 30.8% for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our effective tax
rate for GAAP disclosure purposes reflects the inclusion of non-taxable earnings attributable to noncontrolling
interest holders in the denominator of our effective tax rate computation. Our actual tax rate for income tax
purposes did not increase.
Results of Operations – Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Summary
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier Corporation stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $104
million ($0.98 per basic and $0.97 per diluted share) an $84.4 million increase compared to $19.5 million ($0.20 per
basic and diluted share) for the year ended December 31, 2009. Net income increased due principally to increased
sales volumes of produced refined products combined with higher refinery gross margins during 2010. Overall
refinery gross margins for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $8.79 per produced barrel compared to $7.21 for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
Overall production levels for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased by 49% over 2009 due to production
from our Tulsa Refineries acquired in June and December 2009 combined with production increases at our Navajo
and Woods Cross Refineries. Additionally, 2009 levels reflect lower production during the first quarter of 2009 due
to scheduled downtime during a planned major maintenance turnaround at our Navajo Refinery.
-46-
Sales and Other Revenues
Sales and other revenues from continuing operations increased 72% from $4,834.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 to $8,322.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, due principally to the effects of a
51% increase in year-over-year volumes of produced refined products sold combined with increased sales prices of
produced refined products. The average sales price we received per produced barrel sold increased 23% from
$74.06 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $91.06 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Sales and other
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, include $35.7 million and $45.2 million, respectively, in
HEP revenues attributable to pipeline and transportation services provided to unaffiliated parties.
Cost of Products Sold
Cost of products sold increased 74% from $4,238 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $7,367.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010, due principally to higher crude oil costs combined with a 51% increase in
volumes of produced refined products sold. The average price we paid per barrel of crude oil and feedstocks used in
production and the transportation costs of moving the finished products to the market place increased 23% from
$66.85 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $82.27 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Gross Refinery Margins
Gross refining margin per produced barrel increased 22% from $7.21 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to
$8.79 for the year ended December 31, 2010, due to an increase in the average sales price we received per produced
barrel sold, partially offset by an increase in the average price we paid per produced barrel of crude oil and
feedstocks. Gross refining margin does not include the effects of depreciation or amortization.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization increased 41% from $356.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009 to $504.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, due principally to costs
attributable to the operations of our Tulsa Refineries acquired in June and December 2009 and higher refinery utility
costs. For the years ended December 2010 and 2009, operating expenses include $52.4 million and $43.5 million,
respectively, in costs attributable to HEP operations.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased 17% from $60.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to
$70.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, due principally to costs associated with the support and
integration of our Tulsa operations and increased payroll costs. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009,
general and administrative expenses include $5.4 million and $5.3 million, respectively, in costs attributable to HEP
operations.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization increased 19% from $98.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $117.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was due principally to depreciation and amortization
attributable to our Tulsa facilities and capitalized refinery improvement projects in 2009 and 2010. For the years
ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, depreciation and amortization expenses include $29.1 million and $26.5
million, respectively, in costs attributable to HEP operations.
Interest Income
Interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $1.2 million compared to $5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Interest income was higher for the year ended December 31, 2009 due to interest received on
income tax refunds and investments in higher yield marketable debt securities.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $74.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $40.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The increase was due principally to interest incurred on our $300 million 9.875% senior
notes issued in 2009 and HEP’s 8.25% senior notes issued in March 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, interest expense included $36.3 million and $23.8 million, respectively, in costs attributable to HEP
operations.
-47-
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased from $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $59.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 due to significantly higher pre-tax earnings for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
2009. Our effective tax rate, before consideration of earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests was 30.8% for
the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 17% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our effective tax rate
for GAAP disclosure purposes reflects the inclusion of non-taxable earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest
holders in the denominator of our effective tax rate computation. Our actual tax rate for income tax purposes did not
increase.
Discontinued Operations
On December 1, 2009, HEP sold its 70% interest in Rio Grande resulting in a $14.5 million gain. Rio Grande
operations generated net earnings of $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 before taking into account
HEP’s noncontrolling interest in the discontinued operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
HollyFrontier Credit Agreement
On July 1, 2011, we entered into a $1 billion senior secured credit agreement (the “HollyFrontier Credit
Agreement”) with Union Bank, N.A. as administrative agent and BNP Paribas as syndication agent, and certain
lenders from time to time party thereto, and terminated our previous $400 million credit agreement. Additionally,
Frontier terminated its previous $500 million credit agreement. The HollyFrontier Credit Agreement matures in July
2016 and may be used to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate
purposes. Obligations under the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement are collateralized by our inventory, accounts
receivables and certain deposit accounts and guaranteed by our material, wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We were in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding
borrowings and outstanding letters of credit totaled $6.1 million under the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement. The
unused commitment available under this credit agreement was $993.9 million at December 31, 2011.
HEP Credit Agreement
At December 31, 2011, HEP had a $275 million senior secured revolving credit facility expiring in February 2016
(the “HEP Credit Agreement”) with an outstanding balance of $200 million. On February 3, 2012, the HEP Credit
Agreement was amended, increasing the size of the credit facility from $275 million to $375 million (the “HEP
Amended Credit Agreement”) and is available to fund capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, distribution
payments and working capital and for general partnership purposes. It is also available to fund letters of credit up to
a $50 million sub-limit and to fund distributions to unitholders up to a $30 million sub-limit. The HEP Amended
Credit Agreement expires in February 2016; however, in the event that the 6.25% HEP Senior Notes (discussed
later) are not repurchased, defeased, refinanced, extended or repaid prior to September 1, 2014, the HEP Amended
Credit Agreement will expire on that date.
HEP’s obligations under the HEP Amended Credit Agreement are collateralized by substantially all of HEP’s assets
(presented parenthetically in our Consolidated Balance Sheets). Indebtedness under the HEP Amended Credit
Agreement is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., its general partner, and guaranteed by HEP’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Any recourse to the general partner would be limited to the extent of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.’s
assets, which other than its investment in HEP, are not significant. HEP’s creditors have no other recourse to our
assets. Furthermore, our creditors have no recourse to the assets of HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
HollyFrontier Senior Notes
Our senior notes consist of the following:
•
•
•
9.875% Senior Notes ($291.8 million principal amount maturing June 2017)
6.875% Senior Notes ($150 million principal amount maturing November 2018)(1)
8.5% Senior Notes ($200 million principal amount maturing September 2016)(1)
(1) Represent senior notes assumed upon our July 1, 2011 merger with Frontier.
-48-
In June 2009, we issued $200 million in aggregate principal amount of the 9.875% Senior Notes maturing June 15,
2017. In October 2009, we issued an additional $100 million aggregate principal amount as an add-on offering to
the 9.875% Senior Notes.
We have additional senior notes that we assumed as a result of our July 1, 2011 merger with Frontier; the 6.875%
Senior Notes having an aggregate principal amount of $150 million maturing November 15, 2018 and the 8.5%
Senior Notes having an aggregate principal amount of $200 million maturing September 15, 2016.
These senior notes (collectively, the “HollyFrontier Senior Notes”) are unsecured and impose certain restrictive
covenants, including limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, incur liens, enter into sale-and-leaseback
transactions, pay dividends, enter into mergers, sell assets and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. At any
time when the HollyFrontier Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s and
no default or event of default exists, we will not be subject to many of the foregoing covenants. Additionally, we
have certain redemption rights under the HollyFrontier Senior Notes.
HollyFrontier Financing Obligation
In October 2009, we sold approximately 400,000 barrels of crude oil tankage at our Tulsa West facility as well as
certain crude oil pipeline receiving facilities to an affiliate of Plains for $40 million in cash. In connection with this
transaction, we entered into a 15-year lease agreement with Plains, whereby we agreed to pay a fixed monthly fee
for the exclusive use of this tankage as well as a fee for volumes received at the receiving facilities purchased by
Plains. Additionally, we have a margin sharing agreement with Plains under which we will equally share contango
profits with Plains for crude oil purchased by them and delivered to our Tulsa West facility for storage. Due to our
continuing involvement in these assets, this sales and lease transaction has been accounted for as a financing
obligation. As a result, we retained these assets on our books and recorded a liability representing the $40 million in
proceeds received.
HEP Senior Notes
HEP’s senior notes consist of the following:
•
•
6.25% HEP Senior Notes ($185 million principal amount maturing March 2015)
8.25% HEP Senior Notes ($150 million principal amount maturing March 2018)
In March 2010, HEP issued $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.25% HEP Senior Notes maturing
March 15, 2018. A portion of the $147.5 million in net proceeds received was used to fund HEP’s $93 million
purchase of certain storage assets at our Tulsa East facility and Navajo Refinery Lovington facility on March 31,
2010. Additionally, HEP used a portion to repay $42 million in outstanding HEP Credit Agreement borrowings,
with the remaining proceeds available for general partnership purposes, including working capital and capital
expenditures.
HEP also has $185 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% HEP Senior Notes maturing March 1, 2015 that
are registered with the SEC.
These HEP senior notes (collectively, the “HEP Senior Notes”) are unsecured and impose certain restrictive
covenants, including limitations on HEP’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, sell assets,
incur certain liens, pay distributions, enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter into mergers. At any time
when the HEP Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s and no default or
event of default exists, HEP will not be subject to many of the foregoing covenants. Additionally, HEP has certain
redemption rights under the HEP Senior Notes.
Indebtedness under the HEP Senior Notes is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., its general partner, and
guaranteed by HEP’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. However, any recourse to the general partner would be limited to
the extent of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.’s assets, which other than its investment in HEP, are not significant.
HEP’s creditors have no other recourse to our assets. Furthermore, our creditors have no recourse to the assets of
HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
-49-
See “Risk Management” for a discussion of HEP’s interest rate swap contracts.
HEP Common Unit Issuances
2011 Issuances
In December 2011, HEP issued 1,475,000 of its common units priced at $53.50 per unit. Aggregate net proceeds of
$75.8 million were used to repay a portion of the $150 million in promissory notes issued to us in connection with
HEP’s November 9, 2011 asset acquisition from us. This repayment to us is eliminated in our consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2011, HEP issued 3,807,615 of its common units to us as partial consideration for its purchase from us
of certain tankage, loading rack and crude receiving assets located at our El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries.
2009 Issuances
In December 2009, HEP issued 1,373,609 of its common units having a value of $53.5 million to Sinclair as partial
consideration of its purchase of Sinclair’s Tulsa logistics assets.
In November 2009, HEP issued 2,185,000 of its common units priced at $35.78 per unit. Aggregate net proceeds of
$74.9 million were used to fund the cash portion of HEP’s December 1, 2009 asset acquisitions, to repay
outstanding borrowings under HEP’s credit agreement and for general partnership purposes.
Additionally in May 2009, HEP issued 2,192,400 of its common units priced at $27.80 per unit. Net proceeds of
$58.4 million were used to repay outstanding borrowings under HEP’s credit agreement and for general partnership
purposes.
Liquidity
We believe our current available cash on hand, along with future internally generated cash flow and funds available
under our credit facilities will provide sufficient resources to fund currently planned capital projects and our
liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. In addition, components of our growth strategy include construction of
new refinery processing units and the expansion of existing units at our facilities and selective acquisition of
complementary assets for our refining operations intended to increase earnings and cash flow. Our ability to acquire
complementary assets will be dependent upon several factors, including our ability to identify attractive acquisition
candidates, consummate acquisitions on favorable terms, successfully integrate acquired assets and obtain financing
to fund acquisitions and to support our growth, and many other factors beyond our control.
As of December 31, 2011, our cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities totaled $1.8 billion.
We consider all highly-liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value, and are invested primarily in
conservative, highly-rated instruments issued by government or municipal entities with strong credit standings.
In September 2011, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program of up to $100 million to repurchase
common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2011, we had
repurchased 586,123 shares at a cost of $17.8 million under this stock repurchase program.
In January 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $350 million stock repurchase program, which replaced the
existing $100 million stock repurchase program. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on
market conditions, corporate, regulatory and other relevant considerations. The stock repurchase program may be
discontinued at any time by the Board of Directors.
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $1,349.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. Net cash
provided by operating activities and investing activities of $1,338.4 million and $228.5 million, respectively,
exceeded cash used for financing activities of $217.1 million. Working capital increased by $1,716.5 million during
2011.
-50-
Cash Flows - Operating Activities
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $1,338.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011
compared to $283.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $1,055.1 million. Net income for
the year ended December 31, 2011 was $1,059.7 million, an increase of $926.6 million from $133.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010. Non-cash adjustments consisting of depreciation and amortization, deferred income
taxes, equity-based compensation expense and derivative instrument adjustments resulted in an increase to operating
cash flows of $178 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $154.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010. Additionally, earnings of our equity method investments, net of distributions, increased
operating cash flows by $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $0.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010. Changes in working capital items increased cash flows by $147.3 million in 2011
compared to $24.7 million in 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2011, inventories increased by $56.8 million
compared to $96.9 million for 2010. Also for 2011, accounts receivable decreased by $286.7 million compared to
an increase of $228.5 million for 2010 and accounts payable decreased by $164.6 million compared to an increase of
$342.2 million for 2010. Additionally, turnaround expenditures were $32 million and $35 million for the years
ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $283.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $211.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $71.8 million. Net income for the
year ended December 31, 2010 was $133.1 million, an increase of $79.8 million from $53.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009. Non-cash adjustments consisting of depreciation and amortization, deferred income
taxes, equity-based compensation expense, gain on sale of assets and interest rate swap adjustments resulted in an
increase to operating cash flows of $154.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $130.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Additionally, SLC Pipeline earnings, net of distributions, increased
operating cash flows by $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a $0.4 million decrease for
the year ended December 31, 2009. Changes in working capital items increased cash flows by $24.7 million in 2010
compared to $44 million in 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2010, inventories increased by $96.9 million
compared to $17.9 million for 2009. Also for 2010, accounts receivable increased by $228.5 million compared to
$474.2 million for 2009 and accounts payable increased by $342.2 million compared to $583.6 million for 2009.
Additionally, turnaround expenditures were $35 million and $33.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
Cash Flows - Investing Activities and Planned Capital Expenditures
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
Net cash flows provided by investing activities were $228.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011
compared to net cash flows used for investing activities $213.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an
increase of $441.7 million. Current year investing activities reflect a net cash inflow due to an $872.7 million
increase in cash and cash equivalents as a result of our July 1, 2011 merger with Frontier. Cash expenditures for
properties, plant and equipment for 2011 increased to $374.2 million compared to $213.2 million for 2010. These
include HEP capital expenditures of $39.3 million and $25.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively. Current year capital expenditures include $164.3 million in costs to construct the UNEV
Pipeline, which was mechanically complete in November 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we
invested $9.1 million in Sabine Biofuels, a development stage biodiesel production facility. Additionally for the year
ended December 31, 2011, we invested $561.9 million in marketable securities and received proceeds of $301
million from the sale of our marketable securities.
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Net cash flows used for investing activities were $213.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to
$534.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $321.4 million. Cash expenditures for
properties, plant and equipment for 2010 decreased to $213.2 million compared to $302.6 million for 2009. These
include HEP capital expenditures of $25.1 million and $33 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Capital expenditures were significantly lower in 2010 due to a higher level of capital project
initiatives in 2009 including refinery expansion projects. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we paid cash
-51-
consideration of $267.1 million in connection with the Tulsa West and East facility acquisitions, invested $175.9
million in marketable securities and received proceeds of $230.3 million from the sale or maturity of marketable
securities. Additionally, HEP acquired logistics and storage assets from an affiliate of Sinclair for $25.7 million and
made a $25.5 million joint venture contribution to the SLC Pipeline. In December 2009, HEP sold its 70% interest
in Rio Grande for $35 million. The cash proceeds received are presented net of Rio Grande’s December 1, 2009
cash balance of $3.1 million.
Planned Capital Expenditures
HollyFrontier Corporation
Each year our Board of Directors approves our annual capital budget which includes specific projects that our
management is authorized to undertake. Additionally, when conditions warrant or as new opportunities arise,
additional projects may be approved. The funds appropriated for a particular capital project may be expended over a
period of several years, depending on the time required to complete the project. Therefore, our planned capital
expenditures for a given year consist of expenditures appropriated in that year’s capital budget plus expenditures for
projects appropriated in prior years which have not yet been completed. Our appropriated capital budget for 2012 is
$257 million including both sustaining capital and major capital projects. We expect to spend approximately $350
million in cash for capital projects in 2012, including projects approved in prior years. In addition, we expect to
spend $120 million on refinery turnarounds and tank maintenance. Refinery turnaround spending is amortized over
the useful life of the turnaround while tank maintenance is expensed as incurred. Our new capital appropriation for
2012 and expected cash spending are as follows:
Capital Budget
(New Appropriation)
Expected Capital
Spending (Cash)
(In millions)
Location:
El Dorado ..........................................
Tulsa .................................................
Navajo ...............................................
Cheyenne ..........................................
Woods Cross .....................................
UNEV ...............................................
Corporate and Other ..........................
Total ..................................................
Type:
Sustaining .........................................
Reliability and Growth ......................
Compliance and Safety .....................
Total ..................................................
$
$
$
$
87
49
26
76
10
-
9
257
74
71
112
257
$
$
$
$
55
101
38
46
85
16
9
350
68
132
150
350
A significant portion of our current capital spending is associated with compliance-oriented capital improvements.
This spending is required due to existing consent decrees (for projects including FCCU flu gas scrubbers and tail gas
treatment units), federal fuels regulations (particularly, MSAT2 which mandates a reduction in the benzene content
of blended gasoline), refinery waste water treatment improvements and other similar initiatives. Our refinery
operations and related emissions are highly regulated at both federal and state levels, and we invest in our facilities
as needed to remain in compliance with these standards. Additionally, when faced with new emissions or fuels
standards, we seek to execute projects that facilitate compliance and also improve the operating costs and/or yields
of associated refining processes.
El Dorado Refinery
Newly appropriated capital projects at the El Dorado Refinery include naphtha splitting and aromatics recovery unit
revamps to reduce benzene in gasoline (MSAT2 compliance) and installation of a new tail gas treatment unit with
our sulfur recovery facilities as required under an existing EPA consent decree. Also included in the 2012 capital
budget are yield improvement projects that address both the FCC Unit and the Coker. A previously appropriated
project which we expect to complete during 2012 is the replacement of an existing Coker furnace with more current
furnace technology. This project is expected to improve Coker on-stream factor and reduce fuel consumption. We
expect to complete this project in late 2012.
-52-
Tulsa Refineries
The most significant newly appropriated capital project for our Tulsa Refineries is conversion of a propane de-
asphalt unit to ROSE technology. This project is expected to cost $25 million and will increase processing of
vacuum tower bottoms, increase the production of bright stock lube, reduce energy consumption, and allow the
shutdown of a low-pressure steam boiler. Projects still underway from prior appropriations include a $58 million
project to recover sulfur from the refinery fuel gas system and to shut down another low pressure steam boiler by
electrification of turbine drivers. The sulfur recovery project is required to comply with our EPA consent decree
but is being enhanced so as to increase our capacity to run lower priced sour / heavy crude in Tulsa. We are also
executing an LPG recovery project in Tulsa at an estimated total cost of $28 million. This project will improve
overall liquid yields and enable us to substitute lower-priced natural gas for LPG’s currently being consumed as
refinery fuel. Other projects underway in Tulsa involve replacement of an existing vacuum tower and improvements
to our wastewater treatment plants and storm water retention systems.
Navajo Refinery
We have approved a new project for the Navajo Refinery to remove sulfur and other contaminants from the crude
unit off-gas stream; this will improve liquid yields and reduce refinery fuel costs. Current spending on previously
appropriated projects includes an MSAT2 project (naphtha splitting and benzene saturation) to reduce reliance on
benzene credits purchases, as well as expenditures to improve the Artesia waste water handling and processing
facilities.
Cheyenne Refinery
We have approved four new compliance projects for the Cheyenne Refinery including wastewater treatment plant
improvements, a wet gas scrubber for the FCC unit to reduce particulate and other emissions, MSAT2 related
investments to reduced benzene in gasoline, and spending for additional tail gas unit associated with our sulfur
recovery facilities. We also plan to improve metallurgy on portions of the Cheyenne Refinery’s delayed coking unit.
These new major capital appropriations total approximately $60 million, and we expect to spend approximately 30%
of this amount on these projects during 2012. Expenditures for MSAT2 compliance projects were accelerated by
approximately one year at each of the Cheyenne and El Dorado Refineries due to the Holly-Frontier merger, this
followed our loss of a small refiner exemption that previously provided for delayed compliance with this standard.
Woods Cross Refinery
We plan to significantly expand our Woods Cross Refinery in response to increased availability of locally-produced
black wax crude oil. We have announced a 10-year crude supply agreement with Newfield Exploration Company
under which we will purchase 20,000 bpd of waxy crudes (black and yellow wax). Our expansion project will
increase crude processing capacity of Woods Cross from 31,000 bpd to 45,000 bpd. Most of the incremental crude
supply is expected to be waxy crude, and the expansion is being configured to create high liquid yields and
relatively large proportions of additional gasoline and diesel fuel in comparison to the increased crude charge. We
expect this $225 million project to have a pre-tax payback period of approximately two years, and we expect to
complete the expansion in approximately the fourth quarter of 2014. Our execution of this project is subject to
certain contingencies, including our receipt of required emissions and other permits. Also at Woods Cross, we have
two significant compliance projects authorized in prior year appropriations. The first of these involves installation
of a wet gas scrubber on the FCC unit to reduce particulate and other emissions and the second relates to MSAT2
compliance which will require naphtha fractionation and benzene saturation.
UNEV
The UNEV Pipeline, in which we own a 75% equity interest, was mechanically completed in November 2011.
Linefill and startup procedures commenced thereafter, and the pipeline and associated product terminals in Cedar
City, Utah and Las Vegas, Nevada were operational during the first quarter of 2012. We believe that the UNEV
Pipeline will play an important role in offsetting seasonal declines in product demand, characteristic of the Salt Lake
City refined products market. We also believe that UNEV will facilitate a growing north-to-south flow of refined
products which we expect will result from the advantaged crude oil economics enjoyed by PADD IV (Rocky
Mountain) refiners. We plan to spend an additional $16 million in 2012 on capital items associated with the
completion and startup of UNEV, and our estimate of total installed cost is now $308 million for our 75% interest in
this pipeline.
-53-
Regulatory compliance items or other presently existing or future environmental regulations / consent decrees could
cause us to make additional capital investments beyond those described above and incur additional operating costs
in order to meet applicable requirements.
HEP
Each year the Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C. board of directors approves HEP’s annual capital budget, which
specifies capital projects that HEP management is authorized to undertake. Additionally, at times when conditions
warrant or as new opportunities arise, special projects may be approved. The funds allocated for a particular capital
project may be expended over a period of several years, depending on the time required to complete the project.
Therefore, HEP’s planned capital expenditures for a given year consist of expenditures approved for capital projects
included in its current year capital budget as well as, in certain cases, expenditures approved for capital projects in
capital budgets for prior years. The 2012 HEP capital budget is comprised of $8.9 million for maintenance capital
expenditures and $25.8 million for expansion capital expenditures.
HEP has recently made certain modifications to its crude oil gathering and trunk line system that have effectively
increased HEP’s ability to gather and transport an additional 10,000 bpd of Delaware Basin crude oil in response to
increased drilling activity in southeast New Mexico. Furthermore, HEP has developed a project to replace a 5-mile
section of this pipeline system that will allow for an additional 15,000 bpd of capacity that will be executed as
needed if Delaware Basin crude volumes continue to increase. This project is estimated to cost approximately $2
million. HEP has a second project which consists of the reactivation and conversion to crude oil service of a 70-
mile, 8-inch petroleum products pipeline owned by HEP. Once in service, this pipeline will initially be capable of
transporting up to 35,000 bpd of crude oil from southeast New Mexico to third-party common carrier pipelines in
west Texas for further transport to major crude oil markets. The scope of this project is being finalized. Subject to
receipt of acceptable shipper support and board approval, this project could be operational in early 2013.
Cash Flows - Financing Activities
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
Net cash flows used by financing activities were $217.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to
cash flows provided by financing activities of $34.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of
$251.6 million. During 2011, we paid $8.2 million principal on our senior notes, paid $1.2 million under our
financing obligation to Plains, purchased $42.8 million in common stock from employees to provide funds for the
payment of payroll and income taxes due upon the vesting of certain share-based incentive awards and also under
the stock repurchase program, paid $252.1 million in dividends, received a $33.5 million contribution from our
UNEV Pipeline joint venture partner and recognized $1.8 million excess tax benefits on our equity based
compensation. Also during this period, HEP received $75.8 million in net proceeds upon the issuance of HEP
common units, received $118 million and repaid $77 million under the HEP Credit Agreement, paid distributions of
$50.9 million to noncontrolling interests and purchased $1.6 million in HEP common units in the open market for
recipients of its restricted unit grants. Additionally, $11.8 million in deferred financing costs were incurred in
connection with the amendment of HEP’s credit facility in February 2011 and a revision to the HollyFrontier Credit
Agreement upon the merger with Frontier. We also incurred $0.6 million in costs associated with the issuance of
HEP’s common units. During 2010, we received and repaid $310 million in advances under the HollyFrontier Credit
Agreement, paid $1 million under our financing obligation to Plains, purchased $1.4 million in common stock from
employees to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due upon the vesting of certain share-based
incentive awards, paid $31.9 million in dividends, received a $23.5 million contribution from our UNEV Pipeline
joint venture partner and recognized $1.1 million excess tax benefits on our equity based compensation. Also during
this period, HEP received $147.5 million in net proceeds upon the issuance of the HEP 8.25% Senior Notes,
received $66 million and repaid $113 million under the HEP Credit Agreement, paid distributions of $48.5 million
to noncontrolling interests and purchased $2.7 million in HEP common units in the open market for recipients of its
restricted unit grants. Additionally, $3.1 million in deferred financing costs were incurred in connection with the
issuance of the HEP 8.25% Senior Notes in March 2010 and an amendment to the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement.
Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009
Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $34.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared
to $406.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $372.3 million. During 2010, we received
-54-
and repaid $310 million in advances under the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement, paid $1 million under our financing
obligation to Plains, purchased $1.4 million in common stock from employees to provide funds for the payment of
payroll and income taxes due upon the vesting of certain share-based incentive awards, paid $31.9 million in
dividends, received a $23.5 million contribution from our UNEV Pipeline joint venture partner and recognized $1.1
million excess tax benefits on our equity based compensation. Also during this period, HEP received $147.5 million
in net proceeds upon the issuance of the HEP 8.25% Senior Notes, received $66 million and repaid $113 million
under the HEP Credit Agreement, paid distributions of $48.5 million to noncontrolling interests and purchased $2.7
million in HEP common units in the open market for recipients of its restricted unit grants. Additionally, $3.1
million in deferred financing costs were incurred in connection with the issuance of the HEP 8.25% Senior Notes in
March 2010 and an amendment to the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement. During 2009, we received $287.9 million in
net proceeds upon the issuance of the HollyFrontier 9.875% Senior Notes, received and repaid $94 million in
advances under the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement, received $40 million under a financing transaction with Plains,
paid $30.1 million in dividends, purchased $1.2 million in common stock from employees to provide funds for the
payment of payroll and income taxes due upon the vesting of certain share-based incentive awards, received a $15.2
million contribution from our UNEV Pipeline joint venture partner and recognized $1.2 million in excess tax
benefits on our equity based compensation. Also during this period, HEP received proceeds of $133 million upon
the issuance of additional common units, received $239 million and repaid $233 million in advances under the HEP
Credit Agreement and paid distributions of $33.2 million to noncontrolling interests. Additionally, we paid $8.8
million in deferred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2009 that relate to the HollyFrontier Senior
Notes issued in June 2009.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents our long-term contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011 in total and by period
due beginning in 2012. The table below does not include our contractual obligations to HEP under our long-term
transportation agreements as these related-party transactions are eliminated in the Consolidated Financial
Statements. A description of these agreements is provided under “Holly Energy Partners, L.P.” under Items 1 and 2,
“Business and Properties.” Also, the table below does not reflect renewal options on our operating leases that are
likely to be exercised.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Total
HollyFrontier Corporation(1)(2)
Long-term debt – principal(3) ..............................
Long-term debt – interest(4) ................................
Supply agreements(5) ..........................................
Transportation agreements(6) ..............................
Other long-term obligations ...............................
Operating leases .................................................
Holly Energy Partners
Long-term debt – principal(7) ..............................
Long-term debt – interest(8) ................................
Pipeline operating and right of way leases .........
Other agreements ................................................
Less than
1 Year
Payments Due by Period
2-3 Years
(In thousands)
4-5 Years
Over
5 Years
1,309 $
$ 679,433 $
346,402
863,395
510,924
23,865
97,401
2,521,420
60,620
443,383
79,348
7,649
25,220
617,529
3,143
120,715
367,523
153,750
10,548
43,574
699,253
$ 204,002 $ 470,979
49,460
115,607
40,139
12,350
149,979
127,847
5,668
-
5,152
23,455
488,929 715,709
535,000
137,684
36,954
15,303
-
29,530
6,668
1,381
200,000
59,060
13,274
2,692
185,000
30,531
13,217
2,364
150,000
18,563
3,795
8,866
724,941
37,579
275,026
231,112
181,224
Total ...................................................................
$ 3,246,361 $ 655,108 $ 974,279 $
720,041 $ 896,933
(1) We may be required to make cash outlays related to our unrecognized tax benefits. However, due to the uncertainty of the
timing of future cash flows associated with our unrecognized tax benefits, we are unable to make reasonably reliable
estimates of the period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective taxing authorities. Accordingly, unrecognized tax
benefits of $2.4 million as of December 31, 2011 have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above. For
further information related to unrecognized tax benefits, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) Amounts shown do not include commitments to deliver barrels of crude oil held for other parties at our refineries. We
periodically hold crude oil owned by third parties in the storage tanks at our refineries, which may be run through
production. We will be obligated to deliver these stored barrels of crude oil upon the other party’s request.
-55-
(3) Our long-term debt consists of the $291.8 million principal balance on the HollyFrontier 9.875% Senior Notes, the $150
million principal balance on the 6.875% Senior Notes, the $200 million principal balance on the 8.5% Senior Notes and a
long-term financing obligation having a principal balance of $37.6 million at December 31, 2011.
(4)
Interest payments consist of interest on the HollyFrontier 9.875% Senior Notes, the 6.875% Senior Notes, the 8.5% Senior
Notes and on our long-term financing obligation.
(5) We have long-term supply agreements to secure certain quantities of crude oil, feedstock and other resources used in the
production process at market prices. We have estimated future payments under these fixed-quantity agreements expiring
between 2012 and 2023 using current market rates.
(6) Consists of contractual obligations under agreements with third parties for the transportation of crude oil, natural gas and
feedstocks to our refineries and for terminal and storage services under contracts expiring between 2016 and 2024.
(7) HEP’s long-term debt consists of the $150 million and the $185 million principal balances on the 8.25% and 6.25% HEP
Senior Notes and $200 million of outstanding borrowings under the HEP Credit Agreement. The HEP Credit Agreement
was amended on February 3, 2012 and expires in 2016.
(8)
Interest payments consist of interest on the 6.25% and 8.25% HEP Senior Notes and interest on long-term debt under the
HEP Credit Agreement. Interest under the credit agreement debt is based on an effective interest rate of 3.49% at
December 31, 2011.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. We consider the following policies to be the most critical to understanding the
judgments that are involved and the uncertainties that could impact our results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows. For additional information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements “Description of
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
Inventory Valuation
Our crude oil and refined product inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the
LIFO inventory valuation methodology and market is determined using current estimated selling prices. Under the
LIFO method, the most recently incurred costs are charged to cost of sales and inventories are valued at the earliest
acquisition costs. In periods of rapidly declining prices, LIFO inventories may have to be written down to market
value due to the higher costs assigned to LIFO layers in prior periods. In addition, the use of the LIFO inventory
method may result in increases or decreases to cost of sales in years when inventory volumes decline and result in
charging cost of sales with LIFO inventory costs generated in prior periods. As of December 31, 2011, many of our
LIFO inventory layers were valued at historical costs that were established in years when price levels were generally
lower; therefore, our results of operation are less sensitive to current market price reductions. As of December 31,
2011, the excess of current cost over the LIFO inventory value of our crude oil and refined product inventories was
$378 million. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the
inventory levels at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of
expected year-end inventory levels and are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.
Deferred Maintenance Costs
Our refinery units require regular major maintenance and repairs that are commonly referred to as “turnarounds.”
Catalysts used in certain refinery processes also require routine “change-outs.” The required frequency of the
maintenance varies by unit and by catalyst, but generally is every two to five years. In order to minimize downtime
during turnarounds, we utilize contract labor as well as our maintenance personnel on a continuous 24 hour basis.
Whenever possible, turnarounds are scheduled so that some units continue to operate while others are down for
maintenance. We record the costs of turnarounds as deferred charges and amortize the deferred costs over the
expected periods of benefit.
-56-
Long-lived Assets
We calculate depreciation and amortization based on estimated useful lives and salvage values of our assets. When
assets are placed into service, we make estimates with respect to their useful lives that we believe are reasonable.
However, factors such as competition, regulation or environmental matters could cause us to change our estimates,
thus impacting the future calculation of depreciation and amortization. We evaluate long-lived assets for potential
impairment by identifying whether indicators of impairment exist and, if so, assessing whether the long-lived assets
are recoverable from estimated future undiscounted cash flows. The actual amount of impairment loss, if any, to be
recorded is equal to the amount by which a long-lived asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. Estimates of
future discounted cash flows and fair values of assets require subjective assumptions with regard to future operating
results and actual results could differ from those estimates. No impairments of long-lived assets were recorded
during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Intangibles and Goodwill
Intangible assets are assets (other than financial assets) that lack physical substance. Goodwill represents the excess
of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Goodwill acquired
in a business combination and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized while intangible assets
with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis. Goodwill and intangible assets not subject to
amortization are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate
the asset might be impaired. There were no impairments of intangible assets or goodwill during the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Variable Interest Entity
HEP is a VIE as defined under GAAP. A VIE is legal entity whose equity owners do not have sufficient equity at
risk or a controlling interest in the entity, or have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interest.
As the general partner of HEP, we have the sole ability to direct the activities of HEP that most significantly impact
HEP’s economic performance. Additionally, since our obligation to absorb losses and receive benefits from HEP
are significant to HEP, we are HEP’s primary beneficiary and therefore we consolidate HEP.
Contingencies
We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, labor, product and other matters.
We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential
ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is
made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new
developments in each matter or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these
matters.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, an accounting standard update was issued that requires the presentation of net income and other
comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements and eliminates
the option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders’ equity. This
standard is effective January 1, 2012 and will be applied retrospectively. This update will not have an impact on our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment
In September 2011, an accounting standard update was issued that allows entities an option to first assess qualitative
factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. This
standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing beginning January 1, 2012. This standard
will not have an impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
RISK MANAGEMENT
We use certain strategies to reduce some commodity price and operational risks. We do not attempt to eliminate all
market risk exposures when we believe that the exposure relating to such risk would not be significant to our future
-57-
earnings, financial position, capital resources or liquidity or that the cost of eliminating the exposure would
outweigh the benefit.
Commodity Price Risk Management
Our primary market risk is commodity price risk. We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in crude
oil and refined products, as well as volatility in the price of natural gas used in our refining operations.
We periodically enter into derivative contracts in the form of commodity price swaps to mitigate price exposure with
respect to:
•
•
•
•
•
our inventory positions;
natural gas purchases;
costs of crude oil;
prices of refined products; and
our refining margins.
As of December 31, 2011, we have outstanding swap contracts serving as cash flow hedges against price risk on
forecasted 2012 purchases of 14,640,000 barrels of WTI crude oil and forecasted sales of 7,320,000 barrels of ultra-
low sulfur diesel and 7,320,000 barrels of conventional unleaded gasoline. In the aggregate, these cash flow hedges
effectively hedge our gross margin on forecasted gasoline and diesel sales, totaling 40,000 BPD in 2012.
We also have swap contracts that lock in the spread between gasoline and butane on forecasted sales (112,500
barrels of gasoline through January 2012) and NYMEX futures contracts to lock in prices on forecasted sales and
purchases of inventory (292,000 barrels and 411,000 barrels, respectively, through 2013).
Interest Rate Risk Management
HEP uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate risk.
As of December 31, 2011 HEP has an interest rate swap contract that hedges HEP’s exposure to the cash flow risk
caused by the effects of LIBOR changes on a $155 million HEP Credit Agreement advance. This interest rate swap
effectively converts $155 million of LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt having an interest rate of 0.99% plus an
applicable margin, currently 2.50%, which equaled an effective interest rate of 3.49% as of December 31, 2011. This
swap matures in February 2016.
The following table presents balance sheet locations and related fair values of outstanding derivative instruments.
These amounts are presented on a gross basis in accordance with GAAP disclosure requirements and do not reflect
the netting of asset or liability positions permitted under the terms of master netting arrangements. Therefore, they
are not equal to amounts presented in our consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, we held $30 million of cash on
margin at December 31, 2011 to collateralize certain counterparty positions. These deposits have an offsetting
current liability on our balance sheet and are not included in the amounts below.
-58-
Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2011
Balance Sheet
Location
Fair Value
Location of Offsetting Balance
Offsetting
Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Prepayments and
other current assets ..... $173,784
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (unrealized gain) ..................... $ 173,338
446
$ 173,784
Cost of products sold (decrease) .............
$173,784
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
Other long-term
liabilities .................... $
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (unrealized loss)....................... $
520
520
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Prepayments and
other current assets .... $ 1,870 Cost of products sold (decrease) ............ $ 1,870
Commodity price swap contracts
Accrued liabilities ....... $ 1,252 Cost of products sold (increase) ............. $ 1,252
December 31, 2010
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Accrued liabilities....... $
38
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(unrealized loss) ................................... $
38
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
Other long-term
liabilities .................... $ 10,026
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(unrealized loss) ................................... $ 10,026
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Accrued liabilities....... $
497 Cost of products sold (increase) ............. $
497
Publicly available information is reviewed on the counterparties in order to review and monitor their financial
stability and assess their ongoing ability to honor their commitments under the swap contracts. These counterparties
are large financial institutions. We have not experienced, nor do we expect to experience, any difficulty in the
counterparties honoring their commitments.
The market risk inherent in our fixed-rate debt and positions is the potential change arising from increases or
decreases in interest rates as discussed below.
For the fixed rate HollyFrontier Senior Notes and HEP Senior Notes, changes in interest rates will generally affect
fair value of the debt, but not our earnings or cash flows. The outstanding principal, estimated fair value and
estimated change in fair value assuming a hypothetical 10% change in the yield-to-maturity rates for these debt
instruments as of December 31, 2011 is presented below:
Outstanding
Principal
Estimated
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Estimated
Change in
Fair Value
HollyFrontier Senior Notes .........................................................
HEP Senior Notes .......................................................................
$
$
641,797 $
335,000 $
693,979 $
344,350 $
26,300
8,600
For the variable rate HEP Credit Agreement, changes in interest rates would affect cash flows, but not the fair value.
At December 31, 2011, borrowings outstanding under the HEP Credit Agreement were $200 million. By means of
its cash flow hedge, HEP has effectively converted the variable rate on $155 million of outstanding principal to a
fixed rate of 3.49 %. For the unhedged $45 million portion, a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates applicable to
the HEP Credit Agreement would not materially affect cash flows.
At December 31, 2011, cash and cash equivalents included investments in investment grade, highly liquid
investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and hence the interest rate market risk
implicit in these cash investments is low. Due to the short-term nature of our cash and cash equivalents, a
hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio.
-59-
Since we have the ability to liquidate this portfolio, we do not expect our operating results or cash flows to be
materially affected by the effect of a sudden change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.
Our operations are subject to normal hazards of operations, including fire, explosion and weather-related perils. We
maintain various insurance coverages, including business interruption insurance, subject to certain deductibles. We
are not fully insured against certain risks because such risks are not fully insurable, coverage is unavailable, or
premium costs, in our judgment, do not justify such expenditures.
We have a risk management oversight committee that is made up of members from our senior management. This
committee oversees our risk enterprise program, monitors our risk environment and provides direction for activities
to mitigate identified risks that may adversely affect the achievement of our goals.
-60-
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See “Risk Management” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
Reconciliations to Amounts Reported Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Reconciliations of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to amounts
reported under generally accepted accounting principles in financial statements.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which we refer to as EBITDA, is calculated as
income from continuing operations plus (i) interest expense, net of interest income, (ii) income tax provision, and
(iii) depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation provided for under GAAP; however, the amounts
included in the EBITDA calculation are derived from amounts included in our consolidated financial statements.
EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or operating income as an indication of our
operating performance or as an alternative to operating cash flow as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA is not
necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. EBITDA is presented here because it is a
widely used financial indicator used by investors and analysts to measure performance. EBITDA is also used by our
management for internal analysis and as a basis for financial covenants.
Set forth below is our calculation of EBITDA from continuing operations.
2011
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
2009
Income from continuing operations ...............................................................
Subtract noncontrolling interest in income from continuing operations ....
Add income tax provision ..........................................................................
Add interest expense ..................................................................................
Subtract interest income .............................................................................
Add depreciation and amortization ............................................................
EBITDA from continuing operations.............................................................
$ 1,059,704
(36,307)
581,991
78,323
(1,284)
159,707
$ 1,842,134
$ 133,051
(29,087)
59,312
74,196
(1,168)
117,529
$ 353,833
$
36,343
(21,134)
7,460
40,346
(5,045)
98,751
$ 156,721
Reconciliations of refinery operating information (non-GAAP performance measures) to amounts reported
under generally accepted accounting principles in financial statements.
Refinery gross margin and net operating margin are non-GAAP performance measures that are used by our
management and others to compare our refining performance to that of other companies in our industry. We believe
these margin measures are helpful to investors in evaluating our refining performance on a relative and an absolute
basis.
Refinery gross margin per barrel is the difference between average net sales price and average cost of products per
barrel of produced refined products. Net operating margin per barrel is the difference between refinery gross margin
and refinery operating expenses per barrel of produced refined products. These two margins do not include the
effect of depreciation and amortization. Each of these component performance measures can be reconciled directly
to our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Other companies in our industry may not calculate these performance measures in the same manner.
-61-
Refinery Gross and Net Operating Margins
Below are reconciliations to our Consolidated Statements of Income for (i) net sales, cost of products and operating
expenses, in each case averaged per produced barrel sold, and (ii) net operating margin and refinery gross margin.
Due to rounding of reported numbers, some amounts may not calculate exactly.
Reconciliations of refined product sales from produced products sold to total sales and other revenues
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(Dollars in thousands, except per barrel amounts)
2009
2011
Average sales price per produced barrel sold ................................................. $
118.82
Times sales of produced refined products (BPD) ..........................................
332,720
365
Times number of days in period ....................................................................
Refined product sales from produced products sold ...................................... $ 14,429,833
$
91.06
228,140
365
$ 7,582,666
$
74.06
151,580
365
$ 4,097,495
Total refined product sales ............................................................................ $ 14,429,833
Add refined product sales from purchased products and rounding (1) ............
350,843
14,780,676
Total refined products sales ...........................................................................
Add direct sales of excess crude oil (2) ...........................................................
558,855
Add other refining segment revenue (3) ..........................................................
52,899
15,392,430
Total refining segment revenue......................................................................
213,566
Add HEP segment sales and other revenues ..................................................
1,247
Add corporate and other revenues .................................................................
Subtract consolidations and eliminations .......................................................
(167,715)
Sales and other revenues ................................................................................ $ 15,439,528
$ 7,582,666
130,866
7,713,532
459,743
113,725
8,287,000
182,114
415
(146,600)
$ 8,322,929
$ 4,097,495
106,893
4,204,388
453,958
131,475
4,789,821
146,561
(636)
(101,478)
$ 4,834,268
Reconciliation of average cost of products per produced barrel sold to total cost of products sold
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(Dollars in thousands, except per barrel amounts)
2011
2009
98.18
Average cost of products per produced barrel sold ........................................ $
332,720
Times sales of produced refined products (BPD) ..........................................
365
Times number of days in period ....................................................................
Cost of products for produced products sold ................................................. $ 11,923,254
$
82.27
228,140
365
$ 6,850,713
$
66.85
151,580
365
$ 3,698,590
Total cost of products for produced products sold ......................................... $ 11,923,254
Add refined product costs from purchased products sold and rounding (1) ....
351,788
12,275,042
Total cost of refined products sold .................................................................
Add crude oil cost of direct sales of excess crude oil (2) ................................
550,619
Add other refining segment cost of products sold (4) ......................................
18,672
Total refining segment cost of products sold .................................................
12,844,333
(164,255)
Subtract consolidations and eliminations .......................................................
Cost of products sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) .............. $ 12,680,078
$ 6,850,713
131,668
6,982,381
454,566
73,410
7,510,357
(143,208)
$ 7,367,149
$ 3,698,590
114,566
3,813,156
449,488
75,229
4,337,873
(99,865)
$ 4,238,008
-62-
Reconciliation of average refinery operating expenses per produced barrel sold to total operating expenses
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(Dollars in thousands, except per barrel amounts)
2009
2011
Average refinery operating expenses per produced barrel sold ..................... $
Times sales of produced refined products (BPD) ..........................................
Times number of days in period ...................................................................
Refinery operating expenses for produced products sold ............................... $
5.36
332,720
365
650,933
Total refinery operating expenses per produced products sold ...................... $
Add other refining segment operating expenses and rounding (5) ..................
Total refining segment operating expenses ....................................................
Add HEP segment operating expenses ..........................................................
Add corporate and other costs ........................................................................
Subtract consolidations and eliminations .......................................................
Operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) ................. $
650,933
35,659
686,592
62,202
1,974
(2,687)
748,081
$
$
$
$
5.08
228,140
365
423,017
423,017
26,573
449,590
52,947
2,387
(510)
504,414
$
$
$
$
5.24
151,580
365
289,912
289,912
23,408
313,320
44,003
41
(509)
356,855
Reconciliation of net operating margin per barrel to refinery gross margin per barrel to total sales and other revenues
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(Dollars in thousands, except per barrel amounts)
2011
2009
15.28
Net operating margin per barrel ..................................................................... $
5.36
Add average refinery operating expenses per produced barrel ......................
20.64
Refinery gross margin per barrel ...................................................................
98.18
Add average cost of products per produced barrel sold .................................
118.82
Average sales price per produced barrel sold ................................................. $
332,720
Times sales of produced refined products (BPD) ..........................................
Times number of days in period ....................................................................
365
Refined product sales from produced products sold ...................................... $ 14,429,833
$
3.71
5.08
8.79
82.27
91.06
228,140
365
$ 7,582,666
$
$
1.97
5.24
7.21
66.85
74.06
151,580
365
$ 4,097,495
$
Total refined product sales from produced products sold .............................. $ 14,429,833
Add refined product sales from purchased products and rounding (1) ............
350,843
14,780,676
Total refined product sales .............................................................................
Add direct sales of excess crude oil (2) ...........................................................
558,855
Add other refining segment revenue (3) ..........................................................
52,899
15,392,430
Total refining segment revenue......................................................................
213,566
Add HEP segment sales and other revenues ..................................................
Add corporate and other revenues .................................................................
1,247
(167,715)
Subtract consolidations and eliminations .......................................................
Sales and other revenues ................................................................................ $ 15,439,528
$ 7,582,666
130,866
7,713,532
459,743
113,725
8,287,000
182,114
415
(146,600)
$ 8,322,929
$ 4,097,495
106,893
4,204,388
453,958
131,475
4,789,821
146,561
(636)
(101,478)
$ 4,834,268
(1) We purchase finished products when opportunities arise that provide a profit on the sale of such products or to meet delivery
commitments.
(2) We purchase crude oil that at times exceeds the supply needs of our refineries. Quantities in excess of our needs are sold at
market prices to purchasers of crude oil that are recorded on a gross basis with the sales price recorded as revenues and the
corresponding acquisition cost as inventory and then upon sale as cost of products sold. Additionally, we enter into buy/sell
exchanges of crude oil with certain parties to facilitate the delivery of quantities to certain locations that are netted at
carryover cost.
(3) Other refining segment revenue includes the incremental revenues associated with NK Asphalt and miscellaneous revenue.
(4) Other refining segment cost of products sold includes the incremental cost of products for NK Asphalt and miscellaneous
costs.
(5) Other refining segment operating expenses include the marketing costs associated with our refining segment and the
operating expenses of NK Asphalt.
-63-
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON ITS ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPANY’S INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of HollyFrontier Corporation (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation.
Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 using the
criteria for effective control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment,
management concludes that, as of December 31, 2011, the Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. That report appears on page
65.
-64-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
and Stockholders of HollyFrontier Corporation
We have audited HollyFrontier Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,
based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission, (the “COSO criteria”). HollyFrontier Corporation’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on its
Assessment of the Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, HollyFrontier Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the COSO criteria.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheets of HollyFrontier Corporation as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the
related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, equity and comprehensive income for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2011 and our report dated February 28, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Dallas, Texas
February 28, 2012
-65-
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page
Reference
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm..............................................
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 .........................................
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .....................................................................
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
-66-
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
and Stockholders of HollyFrontier Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of HollyFrontier Corporation (the “Company”) as
of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, equity and
comprehensive income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of HollyFrontier Corporation at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), HollyFrontier Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2012 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Dallas, Texas
February 28, 2012
/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
-67-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
December 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (HEP: $3,269 and $403, respectively) ................................................................
Marketable securities ......................................................................................................................................
$ 1,578,904
211,639
$
229,101
1,343
Accounts receivable, net: Product and transportation (HEP: $34,071 and $22,508, respectively) ..............
Crude oil resales ...................................................................................................
Inventories:
Crude oil and refined products .............................................................................
Materials and supplies (HEP: $1,483 and $202, respectively) ...........................
Income taxes receivable ..................................................................................................................................
Prepayments and other (HEP: $1,161 and $573, respectively) .....................................................................
Total current assets ..................................................................................................................................
Properties, plants and equipment, at cost (HEP: $679,852 and $552,398, respectively) ..................................
Less accumulated depreciation (HEP: $(89,609) and $(60,300), respectively) .................................................
Marketable securities (long-term)
Other assets:
Turnaround costs ..................................................................................................
Goodwill (HEP: $288,991 and $81,602) .............................................................
Intangibles and other (HEP: $75,902 and $72,434, respectively) .....................
Total assets ................................................................................................................................................
703,691
743,544
1,447,235
1,052,084
62,535
1,114,619
87,277
219,450
4,659,124
299,081
694,035
993,116
353,636
46,731
400,367
51,034
28,474
1,703,435
3,631,787
(578,882)
3,052,905
2,215,828
(459,137)
1,756,691
50,067
-
57,060
2,336,510
158,955
2,552,525
$ 10,314,621
69,533
82,565
89,251
241,349
$ 3,701,475
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable (HEP: $11,406 and $10,238, respectively) .......................................................................
Income taxes payable ......................................................................................................................................
Accrued liabilities (HEP: $16,285 and $21,206, respectively) ......................................................................
Deferred income tax liabilities ........................................................................................................................
Total current liabilities ............................................................................................................................
$ 2,243,072
40,366
169,940
175,683
2,629,061
$ 1,317,446
-
72,409
-
1,389,855
Long-term debt (HEP: $598,761 and $482,271, respectively) ...........................................................................
Deferred income tax liabilities ............................................................................................................................
Other long-term liabilities (HEP: $4,000 and $10,809, respectively) ................................................................
1,214,742
463,721
171,197
810,561
131,935
80,985
Equity:
HollyFrontier stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value – 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued ...............................................
Common stock $.01 par value – 320,000,000 shares authorized; 255,962,866 and 152,692,864 shares
issued as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively ....................................................
Additional capital ............................................................................................................................................
Retained earnings ............................................................................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ..........................................................................................
Common stock held in treasury, at cost – 46,630,220 and 46,163,488 shares as of December 31, 2011
-
-
2,563
3,859,367
1,964,656
77,873
1,526
193,615
1,206,328
(26,246)
and 2010, respectively ................................................................................................................................
Total HollyFrontier stockholders’ equity ..............................................................................................
(700,449)
5,204,010
(677,804)
697,419
Noncontrolling interest .....................................................................................................................................
Total equity ....................................................................................................................................................
Total liabilities and equity .......................................................................................................................
631,890
5,835,900
$ 10,314,621
590,720
1,288,139
$ 3,701,475
Parenthetical amounts represent asset and liability balances attributable to Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (“HEP”) as of December 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010. HEP is a consolidated variable interest entity.
Holly Corporation changed its name to HollyFrontier Corporation in connection with the consummation of its “merger of equals” with
Frontier Oil Corporation which became effective on July 1, 2011. The financial statements included herein reflect financial information of the
former Frontier business operations beginning July 1, 2011.
See accompanying notes.
-68-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
2011
2010
2009
Sales and other revenues .................................................................................................
$ 15,439,528
$ 8,322,929
$ 4,834,268
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) ............................
Operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) ...............................
General and administrative expenses (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) ...
Depreciation and amortization ......................................................................................
Total operating costs and expenses .......................................................................
12,680,078
748,081
120,114
159,707
13,707,980
7,367,149
504,414
70,839
117,529
8,059,931
4,238,008
356,855
60,343
98,751
4,753,957
Income from operations ..................................................................................................
1,731,548
262,998
80,311
Other income (expense):
Earnings of equity method investments ........................................................................
Interest income ..............................................................................................................
Interest expense .............................................................................................................
Merger transaction costs ...............................................................................................
Acquisition costs – Tulsa refineries ..............................................................................
Income from continuing operations before income taxes ...........................................
Income tax provision:
Current ...........................................................................................................................
Deferred.........................................................................................................................
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
2,300
1,284
(78,323)
(15,114)
-
(89,853)
1,641,695
590,851
(8,860)
581,991
1,059,704
Discontinued operations
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes ......................................................
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of taxes ...................................................
Income from discontinued operations ...........................................................................
-
-
-
2,393
1,168
(74,196)
-
-
(70,635)
192,363
35,472
23,840
59,312
133,051
-
-
-
Net income ........................................................................................................................
1,059,704
133,051
Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest ....................................................
36,307
29,087
1,919
5,045
(40,346)
-
(3,126)
(36,508)
43,803
(30,062)
37,522
7,460
36,343
4,425
12,501
16,926
53,269
33,736
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ..............................................
$ 1,023,397
$
103,964
$
19,533
Earnings attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders:
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
Income from discontinued operations ..........................................................................
Net income ....................................................................................................................
$ 1,023,397
-
$ 1,023,397
Earnings per share attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders – basic:
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
Income from discontinued operations ...........................................................................
Net income .....................................................................................................................
Earnings per share attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders – diluted:
Income from continuing operations ..............................................................................
Income from discontinued operations ...........................................................................
Net income .....................................................................................................................
$
$
$
$
6.46
-
6.46
6.42
-
6.42
$
$
$
$
$
$
103,964
-
103,964
0.98
-
0.98
0.97
-
0.97
$
$
$
$
$
$
15,209
4,324
19,533
0.15
0.05
0.20
0.15
0.05
0.20
Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic ..............................................................................................................................
Diluted ...........................................................................................................................
158,486
159,294
106,436
107,218
100,836
101,206
See accompanying notes.
-69-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income ......................................................................................................................................
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization (includes discontinued operations) .....................................
Earnings of equity method investments, net of distributions ...............................................
Deferred income taxes ..........................................................................................................
Equity based compensation expense ....................................................................................
Gain on sale of assets, before income taxes .........................................................................
Change in fair value – derivative instruments ......................................................................
(Increase) decrease in current assets:
Accounts receivable .........................................................................................................
Inventories .......................................................................................................................
Income taxes receivable ...................................................................................................
Prepayments and other .....................................................................................................
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities:
Accounts payable .............................................................................................................
Income taxes payable .......................................................................................................
Accrued liabilities ............................................................................................................
Turnaround expenditures ......................................................................................................
Other, net ..............................................................................................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities ..............................................................................
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to properties, plants and equipment ................................................................................
Additions to properties, plants and equipment – HEP ....................................................................
Acquisition of Tulsa Refinery facilities ..........................................................................................
Acquisition of logistics assets from Sinclair Oil Company – HEP .................................................
Increase in cash due to merger with Frontier ..................................................................................
Investment in SLC Pipeline – HEP .................................................................................................
Investment in Sabine Biofuels .........................................................................................................
Proceeds from sale of interest in Rio Grande Pipeline Company, net of transferred cash – HEP .
Purchases of marketable securities ..................................................................................................
Sales and maturities of marketable securities ..................................................................................
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities .............................................................
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under credit agreement ...............................................................................................
Repayments under credit agreement ...............................................................................................
Borrowings under credit agreement – HEP .....................................................................................
Repayments under credit agreement – HEP ....................................................................................
Proceeds from Plains financing transaction ....................................................................................
Repayments under Plains financing transaction .............................................................................
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes ..........................................................................................
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes – HEP ...............................................................................
Proceeds from issuance of common units – HEP ...........................................................................
Principal tender on senior notes ......................................................................................................
Purchase of treasury stock ...............................................................................................................
Contribution from joint venture partner ..........................................................................................
Dividends .........................................................................................................................................
Distributions to noncontrolling interest ...........................................................................................
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation .......................................................................
Purchase of units for restricted grants – HEP ..................................................................................
Deferred financing costs ..................................................................................................................
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options ......................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................................................
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities.............................................................
Cash and cash equivalents:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2011
$
1,059,704
$
133,051
$
53,269
159,707
387
(8,860)
26,825
-
306
286,737
(56,828)
(36,394)
(14,214)
(164,574)
72,091
60,467
(32,023)
(14,940)
1,338,391
(334,904)
(39,337)
-
-
872,739
-
(9,125)
-
(561,899)
301,020
228,494
-
-
118,000
(77,000)
-
(1,160)
-
75,815
(8,203)
(42,795)
33,500
(252,133)
(50,874)
1,804
(1,641)
(11,815)
-
(580)
(217,082)
117,529
482
23,840
11,498
-
1,464
(228,466)
(96,854)
(14,990)
369
342,182
-
22,414
(34,966)
5,702
283,255
(188,129)
(25,103)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(213,232)
310,000
(310,000)
66,000
(113,000)
-
(1,028)
-
147,540
-
-
(1,368)
23,500
(31,868)
(48,493)
(1,094)
(2,704)
(3,121)
118
-
34,482
99,633
(419)
37,522
7,549
(14,479)
175
(474,205)
(17,904)
(33,270)
(15,816)
583,550
-
1,651
(33,541)
17,830
211,545
(269,552)
(32,999)
(267,141)
(25,665)
-
(25,500)
-
31,865
(175,892)
230,281
(534,603)
94,000
(94,000)
239,000
(233,000)
40,000
-
287,925
-
133,035
-
(1,214)
15,150
(30,123)
(33,200)
(1,209)
(616)
(8,842)
134
(191)
406,849
Increase for the period ..................................................................................................................
Beginning of period .........................................................................................................................
End of period ..................................................................................................................................
$
1,349,803
229,101
1,578,904
$
104,505
124,596
229,101
$
83,791
40,805
124,596
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest ........................................................................................................................................
Income taxes ...............................................................................................................................
$
$
78,483
552,487
$
$
66,674
62,084
$
$
39,995
19,344
See accompanying notes.
-70-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In thousands)
HollyFrontier Stockholders’ Equity
Common
Stock
Additional
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Treasury
Stock
Non-
controlling
Interest
Total Equity
$
121,298
-
-
$ 1,145,388
19,533
(30,580)
$
(35,081)
-
-
$
(690,800)
-
-
$
394,792
33,736
-
$
936,332
53,269
(30,580)
-
-
-
73,972
-
-
134
371
(6,083)
5,873
(763)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9,381
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,083
-
-
(1,214)
-
(33,200)
(33,200)
(8,718)
(8,718)
2,021
-
186,801
13,650
-
-
-
699
-
-
(1,039)
11,402
74,000
186,801
13,650
135
371
-
6,572
-
(1,214)
(1,039)
$
194,802
-
-
$ 1,134,341
103,964
(31,977)
$
(25,700)
-
-
$
(685,931)
-
-
$
588,742
29,087
-
$ 1,207,781
133,051
(31,977)
-
-
-
118
416
(1)
(9,494)
-
-
-
7,773
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(546)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9,495
-
(1,368)
-
(48,493)
(1,623)
23,500
-
-
-
2,215
-
(2,708)
(48,493)
(2,169)
23,500
118
416
-
9,988
(1,368)
(2,708)
$
1,526
-
-
$
193,615
-
-
$ 1,206,328
1,023,397
(265,069)
$
(26,246)
-
-
$
(677,804)
-
-
$
590,720
36,307
-
$ 1,288,139
1,059,704
(265,069)
-
-
-
-
1,037
3,704,203
-
-
-
-
-
(44,885)
-
(20,150)
26,584
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
103,881
238
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(50,874)
(50,874)
2,815
106,696
-
3,705,240
16,852
36,500
20,150
-
(42,795)
-
-
2,046
-
(2,476)
(27,795)
36,500
-
28,630
(42,795)
(2,476)
$
$
735
-
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
1
-
-
-
763
-
-
1,527
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Balance at December 31, 2008 ............
Net income ............................................
Dividends ...............................................
Distributions to noncontrolling
interest holders ....................................
Elimination of noncontrolling
interest upon HEP’s sale of Rio
Grande Pipeline Company ..................
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax
Issuance of common shares ...................
Issuance of HEP common units, net
of issuing costs ....................................
Contribution from joint venture partner
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options .....................
Tax benefit from stock options ..............
Issuance of common stock under
incentive compensation plans, net of
forfeitures ...........................................
Equity based compensation, net of
tax benefit ............................................
Two-for-one stock split .........................
Purchase of treasury stock .....................
Other ......................................................
Balance at December 31, 2009 ............
Net income ............................................
Dividends ...............................................
Distributions to noncontrolling
interest holders ....................................
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax ....
Contribution from joint venture partner
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of stock options .....................
Tax benefit from stock options ..............
Issuance of common stock under
incentive compensation plans, net of
forfeitures ...........................................
Equity based compensation, net of
tax benefit ...........................................
Purchase of treasury stock .....................
Other
Balance at December 31, 2010 ............
Net income ............................................
Dividends ...............................................
Distributions to noncontrolling
interest holders ....................................
Other comprehensive income, net
of tax ....................................................
Issuance of common stock upon
merger with Frontier Oil Corporation
Allocated equity on HEP common unit
issuances, net of tax ............................
Contribution from joint venture partner
Issuance of common stock under
incentive compensation plans, net of
forfeitures ...........................................
Equity based compensation, net of
tax benefit ...........................................
Purchase of treasury stock .....................
Other ......................................................
Balance at December 31, 2011 ............
$
2,563
$ 3,859,367
$ 1,964,656
$
77,873
$
(700,449)
$
631,890
$ 5,835,900
See accompanying notes.
-71-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2011
Net income ........................................................................................................
$ 1,059,704
$
133,051
$
53,269
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities ...............................
Reclassification adjustment to net income on sale or
maturity of marketable securities ...........................................................
Total unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities .........................
(530)
14
(516)
114
-
114
173
236
409
Hedging instruments:
Change in fair value of cash flow hedging instruments .............................
Amortization of unrealized loss attributable to discontinued cash flow
176,895
(1,999)
3,726
hedge ......................................................................................................
41
-
Reclassification adjustment to net income on settlement
of cash flow hedging instruments ...........................................................
Total unrealized gain (loss) on hedging instruments ......................................
Retirement medical obligation adjustment .....................................................
Minimum pension liability adjustment ..........................................................
Other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes ..................................
Income tax expense (benefit) .........................................................................
Other comprehensive income (loss) ...................................................................
-
176,936
(3,515)
(71)
172,834
66,138
106,696
Total comprehensive income .............................................................................
1,166,400
Less noncontrolling interest in comprehensive income .....................................
39,122
1,076
(923)
(238)
(1,470)
(2,517)
(348)
(2,169)
130,882
27,464
-
-
3,726
742
12,497
17,374
5,972
11,402
64,671
35,757
Comprehensive income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ...........
$ 1,127,278
$
103,418
$
28,914
See accompanying notes.
-72-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business: References herein to HollyFrontier Corporation (“HollyFrontier”) include HollyFrontier
and its consolidated subsidiaries. In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) “Plain
English” guidelines, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been written in the first person. In these financial
statements, the words “we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” refer only to HollyFrontier and its consolidated subsidiaries or to
HollyFrontier or an individual subsidiary and not to any other person with certain exceptions. Generally, the words
“we,” “our,” “ours” and “us” include HEP and its subsidiaries as consolidated subsidiaries of HollyFrontier, unless
when used in disclosures of transactions or obligations between HEP and HollyFrontier or its other subsidiaries.
These financial statements contain certain disclosures of agreements that are specific to HEP and its consolidated
subsidiaries and do not necessarily represent obligations of HollyFrontier. When used in descriptions of agreements
and transactions, “HEP” refers to HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We merged with Frontier Oil Corporation (“Frontier”) effective July 1, 2011. Concurrent with the merger, we
changed our name from Holly Corporation (“Holly”) to HollyFrontier and changed the ticker symbol for our
common stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange to “HFC” (see Note 2). Accordingly, these financial
statements include Frontier, its consolidated subsidiaries and the operations of the merged Frontier businesses
effective July 1, 2011, but not prior to this date.
We are principally an independent petroleum refiner that produces high-value light products such as gasoline, diesel
fuel, jet fuel, specialty lubricant products, and specialty and modified asphalt. We own and operate five petroleum
refineries that serve markets throughout the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United
States. As of December 31, 2011, we:
•
•
•
•
•
owned and operated a petroleum refinery in El Dorado, Kansas (the “El Dorado Refinery”), two refinery
facilities located in Tulsa, Oklahoma (collectively, the “Tulsa Refineries”), a refinery in Artesia, New
Mexico that is operated in conjunction with crude oil distillation and vacuum distillation and other facilities
situated 65 miles away in Lovington, New Mexico (collectively, the “Navajo Refinery”), a refinery located
in Cheyenne, Wyoming (the “Cheyenne Refinery”) and a refinery in Woods Cross, Utah (the “Woods
Cross Refinery”);
owned and operated NK Asphalt Partners (“NK Asphalt”) which operates various asphalt terminals in
Arizona and New Mexico;
owned a 75% interest in a 12-inch refined products pipeline from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas,
Nevada, together with terminal facilities in the Cedar City, Utah and North Las Vegas areas (the “UNEV
Pipeline”);
owned Ethanol Management Company (“EMC”), a products terminal and blending facility near Denver,
Colorado and a 50% interest in Sabine Biofuels II, LLC (“Sabine Biofuels”), a biodiesel production facility
located in Port Arthur, Texas; and
owned a 42% interest in HEP, a consolidated variable interest entity (“VIE”), which includes our 2%
general partner interest. HEP owns and operates logistic assets consisting of petroleum product and crude
oil pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that principally support our refining and
marketing operations in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States
and Alon USA, Inc.’s (“Alon”) refinery in Big Spring, Texas. Additionally, HEP owns a 25% interest in
SLC Pipeline LLC (the “SLC Pipeline”), a 95-mile intrastate pipeline system that serves refineries in the
Salt Lake City area.
On August 3, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split, payable in the form of a common
stock dividend for each issued and outstanding share of our common stock. The stock dividend was paid August 31,
2011 to all shareholders of record on August 24, 2011. We have retained the current par value of $0.01 per share for
all shares of our common stock and have reclassified $763,000 (the amount equal to the par value of the additional
stock issued) from additional capital to common stock to reflect this stock split at December 31, 2010. All
references to share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have
been adjusted to reflect the effect of the stock split for all periods presented.
-73-
Principles of Consolidation: Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of
partnerships and joint ventures that we control through a 50% or more ownership interest or through a controlling
financial interest with respect to variable interest entities. All significant intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated.
Variable Interest Entity: HEP is a VIE as defined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).
A VIE is a legal entity whose equity owners do not have sufficient equity at risk or a controlling interest in the
entity, or have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interest. As the general partner of HEP, we
have the sole ability to direct the activities of HEP that most significantly impact HEP’s economic performance.
Additionally, since our obligation to absorb losses and receive benefits from HEP are significant to HEP, we are
HEP’s primary beneficiary and therefore, we consolidate HEP. Our revaluation of HEP’s assets and liabilities at
March 1, 2008 (date of reconsolidation) resulted in basis adjustments to our consolidated HEP balances. Therefore,
our reported amounts for HEP may not agree to amounts reported in HEP’s periodic public filings.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents: We consider all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of
purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value and are
primarily invested in highly-rated instruments issued by government or municipal entities with strong credit
standings.
Marketable Securities: We consider all marketable debt securities with maturities greater than three months at the
date of purchase to be marketable securities. Our marketable securities are primarily issued by government and
municipal entities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue not more than two years, while the
maximum duration of the portfolio of investments is not greater than one year. These instruments are classified as
available-for-sale, and as a result, are reported at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of related income
taxes, are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Accounts Receivable: The majority of our accounts receivable are due from companies in the petroleum industry.
Credit is extended based on evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and in certain circumstances, collateral,
such as letters of credit or guarantees, is required. We reserve for doubtful accounts based on current sales levels as
well as specific accounts identified as high risk, which historically have been minimal. Credit losses are charged to
the allowance for doubtful accounts when an account is deemed uncollectible. Our allowance for doubtful accounts
was $3.5 million and $2.1 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Accounts receivable attributable to crude oil resales generally represent the sell side of excess crude oil sales to
other purchasers and / or users in cases when our crude oil supplies are in excess of our immediate needs as well as
certain reciprocal buy /sell exchanges of crude oil. At times we enter into such buy / sell exchanges to facilitate the
delivery of quantities to certain locations. In many cases, we enter into net settlement agreements relating to the
buy/sell arrangements, which may mitigate credit risk.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method for crude oil
unfinished and finished refined products and the average cost method for materials and supplies, or market. Cost,
consisting of raw material, transportation and conversion costs, is determined using the LIFO inventory valuation
methodology and market is determined using current estimated selling prices. Under the LIFO method, the most
recently incurred costs are charged to cost of sales and inventories are valued at the earliest acquisition costs. In
periods of rapidly declining prices, LIFO inventories may have to be written down to market value due to the higher
costs assigned to LIFO layers in prior periods. In addition, the use of the LIFO inventory method may result in
increases or decreases to cost of sales in years that inventory volumes decline as the result of charging cost of sales
with LIFO inventory costs generated in prior periods. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is
made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are
based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and are subject to the final year-end LIFO
inventory valuation.
-74-
Derivative Instruments: All derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities in our consolidated
balance sheets and are measured at fair value. Changes in the derivative instrument’s fair value are recognized in
earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. See Note 14, Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, for additional information.
Long-lived assets: We calculate depreciation and amortization based on estimated useful lives and salvage values
of our assets. We evaluate long-lived assets for potential impairment by identifying whether indicators of
impairment exist and, if so, assessing whether the long-lived assets are recoverable from estimated future
undiscounted cash flows. The actual amount of impairment loss, if any, to be recorded is equal to the amount by
which a long-lived asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. No impairments of long-lived assets were recorded
during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Asset Retirement Obligations: We record legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that
result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of long-lived assets. The fair
value of the estimated cost to retire a tangible long-lived asset is recorded as a liability with the associated retirement
costs capitalized as part of the asset’s carrying amount in the period in which it is incurred and when a reasonable
estimate of the fair value of the liability can be made. If a reasonable estimate cannot be made at the time the
liability is incurred, we record the liability when sufficient information is available to estimate the liability’s fair
value.
At December 31, 2011, we have an asset retirement obligations of $14.4 million, which are included in “Other long-
term liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets. We acquired asset retirement obligations of $6.2 million in
connection with our “merger of equals” with Frontier on July 1, 2011 and $5.8 million with our Tulsa refinery
facility acquisitions in 2009 (see Note 2). Accretion expense was insignificant for the years ended December 31,
2011, 2010 and 2009.
Intangibles and Goodwill: Intangible assets are assets (other than financial assets) that lack physical substance.
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of the assets acquired less
liabilities assumed. Goodwill acquired in a business combination and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
are not amortized while, intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis. Goodwill
and intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances indicate the asset might be impaired.
In addition to goodwill, our consolidated HEP assets include a third-party transportation agreement that currently
generates minimum annual cash inflows of $23.4 million and has an expected remaining term through 2035. The
transportation agreement is being amortized on a straight-line basis through 2035 that results in annual amortization
expense of $2 million. At December 31, 2011, the balance of this transportation agreement was $46.5 million, net
of accumulated amortization of $13.7 million, which is included in “Intangibles and other” in our consolidated
balance sheets. There were no impairments of intangible assets or goodwill during the years ended December 31,
2011, 2010 and 2009.
Investments in Joint Ventures: We consolidate the financial and operating results of joint ventures in which we
have an ownership interest of greater than 50% and use the equity method of accounting for investments in which
we have a 50% or less ownership interest. Under the equity method of accounting, we record our pro-rata share of
earnings, and contributions to and distributions from joint ventures as adjustments to our investment balance.
HEP has a 25% joint venture interest in the SLC Pipeline that is accounted for using the equity method of
accounting. As of December 31, 2011, HEP’s underlying equity in the SLC Pipeline was $60.9 million compared to
its recorded investment balance of $25.3 million, a difference of $35.6 million. This is attributable to the difference
between HEP’s contributed capital and its allocated equity at formation of the SLC Pipeline. This difference is
being amortized as an adjustment to HEP’s pro-rata share of earnings.
Revenue Recognition: Refined product sales and related cost of sales are recognized when products are shipped
and title has passed to customers. HEP recognizes pipeline transportation revenues as products are shipped through
-75-
its pipelines. All revenues are reported inclusive of shipping and handling costs billed and exclusive of any taxes
billed to customers. Shipping and handling costs incurred are reported in cost of products sold.
Depreciation: Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets,
primarily 20 to 25 years for refining, pipeline and terminal facilities, 10 to 40 years for buildings and improvements,
5 to 30 years for other fixed assets and 5 years for vehicles.
Cost Classifications: Costs of products sold include the cost of crude oil, other feedstocks, blendstocks and
purchased finished products, inclusive of transportation costs. We purchase crude oil that at times exceeds the
supply needs of our refineries. Quantities in excess of our needs are sold at market prices to purchasers of crude oil
that are recorded on a gross basis with the sales price recorded as revenues and the corresponding acquisition cost as
cost of products sold. Additionally, we enter into buy/sell exchanges of crude oil with certain parties to facilitate the
delivery of quantities to certain locations that are netted at carryover cost. Operating expenses include direct costs
of labor, maintenance materials and services, utilities, marketing expense and other direct operating costs. General
and administrative expenses include compensation, professional services and other support costs.
Deferred Maintenance Costs: Our refinery units require regular major maintenance and repairs which are
commonly referred to as “turnarounds.” Catalysts used in certain refinery processes also require regular “change-
outs.” The required frequency of the maintenance varies by unit and by catalyst, but generally is every two to five
years. Turnaround costs are deferred and amortized over the period until the next scheduled turnaround. Other
repairs and maintenance costs are expensed when incurred.
Environmental Costs: Environmental costs are charged to operating expenses if they relate to an existing condition
caused by past operations and do not contribute to current or future revenue generation. Liabilities are recorded
when site restoration and environmental remediation, cleanup and other obligations are either known or considered
probable and can be reasonably estimated. Such estimates require judgment with respect to costs, timeframe and
extent of required remedial and clean-up activities and are subject to periodic adjustments based on currently
available information. Recoveries of environmental costs through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other
sources are included in other assets to the extent such recoveries are considered probable.
Contingencies: We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, labor, product
and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters
as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these
contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future
due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing
with these matters.
Income Taxes: Provisions for income taxes include deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences in income
for financial and tax purposes, using the liability method of accounting for income taxes. The liability method
requires the effect of tax rate changes on current and accumulated deferred income taxes to be reflected in the period
in which the rate change was enacted. The liability method also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a
valuation allowance unless it is more likely than not that the assets will be realized.
Potential interest and penalties related to income tax matters are recognized in income tax expense. We believe we
have appropriate support for the income tax positions taken and to be taken on our income tax returns and that our
accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years based on an assessment of many factors, including past
experience and interpretations of tax law applied to the facts of each matter.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, an accounting standard update was issued that requires the presentation of net income and other
comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements and eliminates
the option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholders’ equity. This
standard is effective January 1, 2012 and will be applied retrospectively. This standard will not have an impact on
our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
-76-
Intangibles — Goodwill and Other: Testing Goodwill for Impairment
In September 2011, an accounting standard update was issued that allows entities an option to first assess qualitative
factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. This
standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing beginning January 1, 2012. This standard
will not have an impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE 2: Merger and Acquisitions
Holly - Frontier Merger
On February 21, 2011, we entered into a merger agreement providing for a “merger of equals” business combination
between us and Frontier for purposes of creating a more diversified company having a broader geographic sales
footprint, stronger financial position and to create a more efficient corporate overhead structure, while also realizing
synergies and promoting accretion to earnings per share. The legacy Frontier business operations consist of crude oil
refining and the wholesale marketing of refined petroleum products produced at the El Dorado and Cheyenne
Refineries and serve markets in the Rocky Mountain and Plains States regions of the United States. On July 1,
2011, North Acquisition, Inc., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Holly, merged with and into Frontier, with
Frontier surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holly. Concurrent with the merger, we changed our name to
HollyFrontier Corporation and changed the ticker symbol for our common stock traded on the New York Stock
Exchange to “HFC.” Subsequent to the merger and following approval by the post-closing board of directors of
HollyFrontier, Frontier merged with and into HollyFrontier, with HollyFrontier continuing as the surviving
corporation.
In accordance with the merger agreement, we issued 102.8 million shares of HollyFrontier common stock in
exchange for outstanding shares of Frontier common stock to former Frontier stockholders. Each outstanding share
of Frontier common stock was converted into 0.4811 shares of HollyFrontier common stock with any fractional
shares paid in cash. The aggregate consideration paid in stock in connection with the merger was $3.7 billion. This
is based on our July 1, 2011 market closing price of $35.93 and includes a portion of the fair value of the
outstanding equity-based awards assumed from Frontier that relates to pre-merger services. The number of shares
issued in connection with our merger with Frontier and the closing market price of our common stock at July 1,
2011 have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split on August 31, 2011.
The merger has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting with Holly being considered the
acquirer of Frontier for accounting purposes. Therefore, the purchase price was allocated to the fair value of the
acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the acquisition date, with the excess purchase price being recorded as
goodwill. The goodwill resulting from the merger is primarily due to the favorable location of the acquired refining
facilities and the expected synergies to be gained from our combined business operations. Goodwill related to this
merger is not deductible for income tax purposes.
The following table summarizes our fair value estimates of the Frontier assets and liabilities recognized upon our
merger on July 1, 2011:
(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents ...........................................................................................
Accounts receivable ....................................................................................................
Inventories ..................................................................................................................
Properties, plants and equipment ................................................................................
Goodwill .....................................................................................................................
Income taxes receivable ..............................................................................................
Other assets .................................................................................................................
Accounts payable ........................................................................................................
Accrued liabilities .......................................................................................................
Long-term debt ...........................................................................................................
Other long-term liabilities ...........................................................................................
Deferred income taxes ................................................................................................
Net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed ............................
$
$
872.7
737.9
657.4
1,054.3
2,254.0
37.8
32.8
(1,076.7)
(40.7)
(370.6)
(96.1)
(357.6)
3,705.2
-77-
Our valuations of the acquired Frontier assets and liabilities are not final as of December 31, 2011. These fair value
estimates, including the value of goodwill and the allocation thereof to our reporting units, are preliminary in nature
and therefore, may change upon the completion of such valuations.
Beginning July 1, 2011, HollyFrontier’s consolidated financial and operating results reflect the operations of the
merged Frontier businesses. Our consolidated statements of income include revenues and income before income
taxes of $4,183.8 million and $575.8 million, respectively, for the period from July 1, 2011 through December 31,
2011 that are attributable to the operations of the legacy Frontier refineries.
Assuming the merger had been consummated on January 1, 2010, pro forma revenues, net income and basic and
diluted earnings per share are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
2011
2010
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Sales and other revenues ...................................................................... $ 19,418,709
Net income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ........................ $ 1,335,257
Basic earnings per share ...................................................................... $ 6.37
Diluted earnings per share ................................................................... $ 6.35
$ 14,207,835
179,979
$
0.86
$
0.86
$
The pro forma financial information above reflects our fair value estimates of the acquired Frontier assets and
liabilities. Adjustments made to derive pro forma net income primarily relate to depreciation and amortization
expense in order to reflect our new basis in the acquired legacy Frontier refining facilities.
As of December 31, 2011, we have recognized $15.1 million in merger transaction costs that are presented
separately in our income statements and primarily relate to legal, advisory and other professional fees incurred since
the announcement of our merger agreement in February 2011. This does not include costs to integrate the
operations of the combined company. For the year ended December 31, 2011, general and administrative expenses
include $26.5 million in integration and severance costs associated with the merger integration.
Tulsa Refinery Acquisitions
On June 1, 2009, we acquired an 85,000 BPSD refinery located in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the “Tulsa West facility”) from
Sunoco for $157.8 million in cash, including crude oil, refined product and other inventories valued at $92.8 million.
In October 2009, we sold to an affiliate of Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (“Plains”) a portion of the crude oil
petroleum storage, and certain refining-related crude oil receiving pipeline facilities that were acquired as part of the
refinery assets. Due to our continuing involvement in these assets, this transaction has been accounted for as a
financing transaction (see Note 13).
On December 1, 2009, we acquired a 75,000 BPSD refinery from an affiliate of Sinclair Oil Company (“Sinclair”)
also located in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the “Tulsa East facility”) for $183.3 million, including crude oil, refined product
and other inventories valued at $46.4 million. The total purchase price consisted of $109.3 million in cash and
2,789,155 shares of our common stock having a value of $74 million. We operate the Tulsa Refineries in an
integrated manner, with both complexes having a combined crude processing rate of 125,000 BPSD.
In accounting for the Tulsa acquisitions, we recorded $20.6 million in materials and supplies, $139.2 million in
crude oil and refined products inventory, $203.8 million in properties, plants and equipment, $8.2 million in
prepayments and other, $6.3 million in accrued liabilities and $24.4 million in other long-term liabilities. The
acquired liabilities primarily relate to environmental and asset retirement obligations. Additionally, we incurred
$3.1 million in costs directly related to these acquisitions that were expensed as acquisition costs in 2009.
NOTE 3: Holly Energy Partners
HEP, a consolidated VIE, is a publicly held master limited partnership that was formed to acquire, own and operate
the petroleum product and crude oil pipeline and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that support our
refining and marketing operations in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United
-78-
States. HEP also owns and operates refined product pipelines and terminals, located primarily in Texas, that serve
Alon USA, Inc.’s (“Alon”) refinery in Big Spring, Texas.
As of December 31, 2011, we owned a 42% interest in HEP, including the 2% general partner interest. We are the
primary beneficiary of HEP’s earnings and cash flows and therefore we consolidate HEP. See Note 22 for
supplemental guarantor/non-guarantor financial information, including HEP balances included in these consolidated
financial statements. All intercompany transactions with HEP are eliminated in our consolidated financial
statements.
HEP has two primary customers (including us) and generates revenues by charging tariffs for transporting petroleum
products and crude oil though its pipelines, by charging fees for terminalling refined products and other
hydrocarbons, and storing and providing other services at its storage tanks and terminals. Under our long-term
transportation agreements with HEP (discussed further below), we represented 78% of HEP’s total revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2011. We do not provide financial or equity support through any liquidity arrangements
and /or guarantees to HEP.
HEP has outstanding debt under a senior secured revolving credit agreement and its senior notes. With the
exception of the assets of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries and HEP’s general
partner, HEP’s creditors have no recourse to our assets. Any recourse to HEP’s general partner would be limited to
the extent of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.’s assets, which other than its investment in HEP, are not significant.
Furthermore, our creditors have no recourse to the assets of HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries. See Note 13 for
a description of HEP’s debt obligations.
At December 31, 2011, we have an agreement to pledge up to 6,000,000 of our HEP common units to collateralize
certain crude oil purchases. These units represent a 21% ownership interest in HEP.
HEP has risk associated with its operations. If a major shipper of HEP were to terminate its contracts or fail to meet
desired shipping or throughput levels for an extended period time, revenue would be reduced and HEP could suffer
substantial losses to the extent that a new customer is not found. In the event that HEP incurs a loss, our operating
results will reflect HEP’s loss, net of intercompany eliminations, to the extent of our ownership interest in HEP at
that point in time.
2011 Acquisition
Legacy Frontier Tankage and Terminal Asset Transaction
On November 9, 2011, HEP acquired from us certain tankage, loading rack and crude receiving assets located at our
El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries. We received non-cash consideration consisting of promissory notes with an
aggregate principal amount of $150 million and 3,807,615 HEP common units.
Since HEP is a consolidated VIE, our transactions with HEP including fees paid under our transportation
agreements with HEP are eliminated and have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2010 Acquisitions
Tulsa East / Lovington Storage Asset Transaction
On March 31, 2010, HEP acquired from us certain storage assets for $93 million, consisting of hydrocarbon storage
tanks having approximately 2 million barrels of storage capacity, a rail loading rack and a truck unloading rack
located at our Tulsa East facility and an asphalt loading rack facility located at our Navajo Refinery facility located
in Lovington, New Mexico.
2009 Acquisitions
Sinclair Logistics and Storage Assets Transaction
On December 1, 2009, HEP acquired from Sinclair storage tanks having approximately 1.4 million barrels of storage
capacity and loading racks at what is now our Tulsa East facility for $79.2 million. The purchase price consisted of
-79-
$25.7 million in cash, including $4.2 million in taxes and 1,373,609 of HEP’s common units having a fair value of
$53.5 million.
Roadrunner / Beeson Pipelines Transaction
Also on December 1, 2009, HEP acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $46.5 million, consisting of a 65-
mile, 16-inch crude oil pipeline (the “Roadrunner Pipeline”) that connects our Navajo Refinery Lovington facility to
a terminus of Centurion Pipeline L.P.’s pipeline extending between west Texas and Cushing, Oklahoma and a 37-
mile, 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects HEP’s New Mexico crude oil gathering system to our Navajo Refinery
Lovington facility (the “Beeson Pipeline”).
Tulsa West Loading Racks Transaction
On August 1, 2009, HEP acquired from us, certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our Tulsa
West facility for $17.5 million. The racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the Tulsa West facility
onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks.
Lovington-Artesia Pipeline Transaction
On June 1, 2009, HEP acquired our newly constructed, 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $34.2 million that runs 65
miles from our Navajo Refinery’s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in Lovington, New Mexico to its
petroleum refinery located in Artesia, New Mexico.
SLC Pipeline Joint Venture Interest
On March 1, 2009, HEP acquired a 25% joint venture interest in the SLC Pipeline, a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline
system jointly owned with Plains. The SLC Pipeline commenced operations effective March 2009 and allows
various refineries in the Salt Lake City area, including our Woods Cross Refinery, to ship crude oil into the Salt
Lake City area from the Utah terminus of the Frontier Pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from Wyoming and Utah
via Plains’ Rocky Mountain Pipeline. HEP’s capitalized joint venture contribution was $25.5 million.
Rio Grande Pipeline Sale
On December 1, 2009, HEP sold its 70% interest in Rio Grande Pipeline Company (“Rio Grande”) to a subsidiary of
Enterprise Products Partners LP for $35 million. Results of operations of Rio Grande are presented in discontinued
operations.
In accounting for this sale, HEP recorded a gain of $14.5 million and a receivable of $2.2 million representing its
final distribution from Rio Grande. The recorded net asset balance of Rio Grande at December 1, 2009, was $22.7
million, consisting of cash of $3.1 million, $29.9 million in properties and equipment, net and $10.3 million in
equity, representing BP, Plc’s 30% noncontrolling interest.
The following table provides income statement information related to HEP’s discontinued operations:
Year Ended
December 31, 2009
(In thousands)
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes ............
Income tax expense .........................................................................
Income from discontinued operations, net ......................................
Gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes .........
Income tax expense .........................................................................
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net ...................................
$
5,367
(942)
4,425
14,479
(1,978)
12,501
Income from discontinued operations, net ......................................
$
16,926
Transportation Agreements
HEP serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal, tankage and throughput agreements expiring in
2019 through 2026. Under these agreements, we pay HEP fees to transport, store and throughput volumes of refined
product and crude oil on HEP’s pipeline and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum
annual payments to HEP. Under these agreements, the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate
adjustments on July 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in Producer Price Index (“PPI”) or Federal Energy
-80-
Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) index. As of December 31, 2011, these agreements result in minimum
annualized payments to HEP of $192 million.
HEP Common Unit Issuances
2011 Issuances
In December 2011, HEP issued 1,475,000 of its common units priced at $53.50 per unit. Aggregate net proceeds of
$75.8 million were used to repay a portion of the $150 million in promissory notes issued to us in connection with
HEP’s November 9, 2011 asset acquisition from us. This repayment to us is eliminated in our consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2011, HEP issued 3,807,615 of its common units to us as partial consideration for its purchase from us
of certain tankage, loading rack and crude receiving assets located at our El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries.
As a result of these 2011 HEP common unit issuances, we adjusted additional capital, other comprehensive income
and equity attributable to HEP’s noncontrolling interest holders to effectively reallocate a portion of HEP’s equity
among its unitholders. Additionally, we recorded a reduction of $80.7 million to additional capital that relates to a
deferred tax liability that was recorded as a result of the goodwill transferred to HEP upon its acquisition of our
tankage and terminal assets in November 2011.
2009 Issuances
In December 2009, HEP issued 1,373,609 of its common units having a value of $53.5 million to Sinclair as partial
consideration of its purchase of Sinclair’s Tulsa logistics assets.
In November 2009, HEP issued 2,185,000 of its common units priced at $35.78 per unit. Aggregate net proceeds of
$74.9 million were used to fund the cash portion of HEP’s December 1, 2009 asset acquisitions, to repay
outstanding borrowings under HEP’s credit agreement and for general partnership purposes.
Additionally in May 2009, HEP issued 2,192,400 of its common units priced at $27.80 per unit. Net proceeds of
$58.4 million were used to repay outstanding borrowings under HEP’s credit agreement and for general partnership
purposes.
Note 4: Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, debt and derivative instruments. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Debt consists of outstanding principal under HEP’s revolving credit agreement (which approximates fair value as
interest rates are reset frequently at current interest rates) and senior notes.
Fair value measurements are derived using inputs, (assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability, including assumptions about risk). GAAP categorizes inputs used in fair value measurements into
three broad levels as follows:
•
•
•
(Level 1) Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
(Level 2) Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active or can be
corroborated by observable market data.
(Level 3) Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to
the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes valuation techniques that involve significant
unobservable inputs.
The carrying amounts and related estimated fair values of our investments in marketable securities, derivative
instruments and the senior notes at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
-81-
Financial Instrument
December 31, 2011
December 31, 2010
Fair Value
Input Level
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
(In thousands)
Investments in marketable securities:
Equity securities ......................................................
Marketable debt securities .......................................
Derivative instruments:
NYMEX futures contracts .......................................
Commodity price swaps ..........................................
Commodity price swaps ..........................................
HEP interest rate swap ............................................
Senior notes:
HollyFrontier senior notes ........................................
HEP senior notes ......................................................
Level 1
Level 2
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 2
Level 2
Level 2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
753
260,953
(1,252)
144,038
31,616
(520)
651,262
325,860
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
753
260,953
(1,252)
144,038
31,616
(520)
693,979
344,350
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,343
-
-
(535)
-
(10,026)
289,509
323,271
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,343
-
-
(535)
-
(10,026)
327,000
339,900
Level 1 Financial Instruments
Our investments in equity securities and our NYMEX futures contracts are exchange traded and are measured and
recorded at fair value using quoted market prices, a Level 1 input.
Level 2 Financial Instruments
Investments in marketable debt securities and derivative instruments consisting of commodity price swaps and
HEP’s interest rate swap are measured and recorded at fair value using Level 2 inputs. With respect to the
commodity price and interest rate swap contracts, fair value is based on the net present value of expected future cash
flows related to both variable and fixed rate legs of the respective swap agreements. The measurements are
computed using market-based observable inputs, quoted forward commodity prices with respect to our commodity
price swaps and the forward London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) yield curve with respect to HEP’s interest
rate swap. The fair value of the marketable debt securities and senior notes is based on values provided by a third-
party bank, which were derived using market quotes for similar type instruments, a Level 2 input.
Level 3 Financial Instruments
During 2011, we entered into certain commodity price swap contracts related to forecasted sales of 14,640,000
barrels of diesel and unleaded gasoline for which quoted forward market prices are not readily available. The
forward rate used to value these price swaps was derived using a projected forward rate using quoted market rates
for similar products, adjusted for regional pricing differentials, a Level 3 input. At December 31, 2011, we had a
pre-tax unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income related to these contracts. Our Level 3
commodity price swaps had no effect on earnings during the year ended December 31, 2011.
NOTE 5: Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations is calculated as income from continuing operations divided by
the average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share assumes, when dilutive, the
issuance of the net incremental shares from stock options, variable restricted shares and variable performance shares.
The average number of shares of common stock and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one
stock split effective August 31, 2011. The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted
per share computations for income from continuing operations:
2011
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands, except per share data)
2009
Earnings attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders:
Income from continuing operations .....................................................................
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding .......................................
Effect of dilutive stock options, variable restricted shares and
performance share units .......................................................................................
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding assuming dilution ..........
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations..............................................
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations ..........................................
$ 1,023,397
$ 103,964
$
15,209
158,486
106,436
100,836
808
159,294
782
107,218
370
101,206
$
$
6.46
$
6.42 $
0.98
0.97
$
$
0.15
0.15
-82-
NOTE 6:
Stock-Based Compensation
As of December 31, 2011, we have two principal share-based compensation plans including the Frontier plan that
was retained upon the July 1, 2011 merger (the “Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan”). All outstanding and
unvested restricted stock and performance share grants under the legacy Frontier plan were converted into
equivalent HollyFrontier units based on the July 1, 2011 common stock conversion ratio of 0.4811. A portion of the
fair value of these awards (based on our July 1, 2011 closing stock price of $35.93) relative to the remaining vesting
period of the awards will be expensed over the remaining terms of these grants.
The compensation cost charged against income for these plans was $24.7 million, $9.3 million and $6.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the
statements of income for share-based compensation arrangements was $9.6 million, $3.6 million and $2.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our current accounting policy for recognizing
compensation expense for awards with pro-rata vesting (substantially all of our awards) is to expense the costs
ratably over the vesting periods. At December 31, 2011, 8,430,045 shares of common stock were reserved for future
grants under the current Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, which allows for awards of common stock,
options, restricted stock, or other performance awards.
Additionally, HEP maintains share-based compensation plans for HEP directors and select Holly Logistic Services,
L.L.C. executives and employees. Compensation cost attributable to HEP’s share-based compensation plans for the
years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2.1 million, $2.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
Restricted Stock
Under our Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, we grant certain officers, other key employees and non-
employee directors restricted stock awards with substantially all awards vesting generally over a period of one to
five years. Although ownership of the shares does not transfer to the recipients until after the shares vest, recipients
generally have dividend rights on these shares from the date of grant. The vesting for certain key executives is
contingent upon certain performance targets being realized. The fair value of each share of restricted stock awarded,
including the shares issued to the key executives, is measured based on the market price as of the date of grant and is
amortized over the respective vesting period.
A summary of restricted stock activity and changes during the year ended December 31, 2011 is presented below:
Restricted Stock
Grants
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
($000)
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 (non-vested) .....................
Granted (1) ..........................................................................
Vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients .................
Forfeited ............................................................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 (non-vested) ...............
693,992
983,858
(528,566)
(26,934)
1,122,350
$
$
14.65
28.61
17.05
26.08
25.48
$
26,263
(1) Includes 425,554 non-vested restricted stock grants under the legacy Frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by
HollyFrontier at July 1, 2011.
The total fair value of restricted stock vested and transferred to recipients during the years ended December 31,
2011, 2010 and 2009 was $9.1 million, $4.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, there
was $13.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock grants. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years.
Performance Share Units
Under our Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, we grant certain officers and other key employees performance
share units, which are payable in stock upon meeting certain criteria over the service period, and generally vest over
a period of one to three years. Under the terms of our performance share unit grants, awards are subject to either a
“financial performance” or “market performance” criteria.
-83-
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we granted 354,660 performance share units having a fair value based on
our grant date closing stock price of $28.79. These units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial
performance criteria. The fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock
price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded. The number of
shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group
companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200%. As of December 31, 2011, estimated
share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% to 195%.
For the legacy Frontier performance share units assumed at July 1, 2011, performance is based on market
performance criteria, which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by HollyFrontier stockholders
compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining
companies over a three-year period. These share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance
relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% of the initial target award. These performance
share units were valued at July 1, 2011 using a Monte Carlo valuation model, which simulates future stock price
movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices, expected stock price
performance, expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year
performance period. The fair value of these performance share units at July 1, 2011 was $8.6 million. Of this
amount, $7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service
period through 2013.
A summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended December 31, 2011 is presented
below:
Performance Share Units
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 (non-vested) ............................................
Granted (1) .................................................................................................
Vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients ........................................
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 (non-vested) ......................................
Grants
556,186
354,660
(136,058)
774,788
(1) Includes 225,116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy Frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by
HollyFrontier at July 1, 2011.
For the year ended December 31, 2011 we issued 178,148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $2.6
million related to vested performance share units. Based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $20.71
there was $11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units.
That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years.
NOTE 7: Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments in Marketable Securities
Our investment portfolio at December 31, 2011 consisted of cash, cash equivalents and investments in debt
securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities. We also hold 1,000,000 shares of Connacher Oil
and Gas Limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our Montana refinery in
2006.
We invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities, primarily issued by government and municipal entities that
have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months. We also invest in other marketable debt
securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from
the date of purchase. All of these instruments, including investments in equity securities, are classified as available-
for-sale. As a result, they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices. Interest income is recorded as
earned. Unrealized gains and losses, net of related income taxes, are reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. Upon sale, realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed
based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses
previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings.
-84-
The following is a summary of our available-for-sale securities:
Available-for-Sale Securities
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
(In thousands)
Estimated Fair
Value
(Net Carrying
Amount)
December 31, 2011
Marketable debt securities (state and political subdivisions) ..
Equity securities ......................................................................
$
260,879
610
$
Total marketable securities .....................................................
$
261,489
$
74
143
217
$ 260,953
753
$ 261,706
December 31, 2010
Equity securities ......................................................................
$
610
$
733
$
1,343
NOTE 8:
Inventories
Inventory consists of the following components:
December 31,
2011
2010
(In thousands)
Crude oil .......................................................................................................................
Other raw materials and unfinished products (1) ...........................................................
Finished products (2) .....................................................................................................
Process chemicals (3) .....................................................................................................
Repairs and maintenance supplies and other ................................................................
Total inventory .............................................................................................................
$
400,952
137,356
513,776
1,180
61,355
$ 1,114,619
$
$
96,570
68,792
188,274
22,512
24,219
400,367
(1) Other raw materials and unfinished products include feedstocks and blendstocks, other than crude.
(2) Finished products include gasolines, jet fuels, diesels, lubricants, asphalts, LPG’s and residual fuels.
(3) Process chemicals include additives and other chemicals.
The excess of current cost over the LIFO value of inventory was $378 million and $284 million at December 31,
2011 and 2010, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, we recognized reductions of $0.1
million and $4.1 million, respectively, to cost of products sold as we liquidated certain LIFO inventory quantities
carried at historical LIFO acquisition costs below market value at the time of liquidation.
NOTE 9:
Properties, Plants and Equipment
Land, buildings and improvements ...............................................................................
Refining facilities .........................................................................................................
Pipelines and terminals .................................................................................................
Transportation vehicles ................................................................................................
Other fixed assets .........................................................................................................
Construction in progress ...............................................................................................
Accumulated depreciation ............................................................................................
December 31,
2011
2010
(In thousands)
$
168,108
2,106,900
922,866
29,418
97,676
306,819
3,631,787
(578,882)
$ 3,052,905
$
91,169
1,174,980
539,045
20,972
83,199
306,463
2,215,828
(459,137)
$ 1,756,691
We capitalized interest attributable to construction projects of $17.2 million and $7.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Depreciation expense was $125 million, $94 million and $78.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009, respectively. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 includes
$29.5 million, $27 million and $25 million, respectively, of depreciation expense attributable to the operations of
HEP.
-85-
NOTE 10: Goodwill
The following is a summary of changes by segment to the carrying amounts of goodwill for the year ended
December 31, 2011:
Refining
Segment
HEP
(In thousands)
Total
Balance at January 1, 2011 ........................................................................
Goodwill attributable to merger with Frontier ...........................................
Balance at December 31, 2011 ..................................................................
$
963
2,046,556
$ 2,047,519
$
$
81,602
207,389
288,991
$
82,565
2,253,945
$ 2,336,510
Based on our annual impairment assessments, we determined that the fair value of our reporting units exceeded their
respective carrying values and therefore no impairments have been recognized. As of December 31, 2011, there
have been no impairments to our goodwill balances.
NOTE 11: UNEV Pipeline Joint Venture
We own a 75% joint venture interest in the recently completed UNEV Pipeline, a 400 mile 12-inch refined products
pipeline from Salt Lake City, Utah to Las Vegas, Nevada, together with terminal and ethanol blending facilities in
the Cedar City, Utah and North Las Vegas areas and storage facilities at the Cedar City terminal with Sinclair, our
joint venture partner, owning the remaining 25% interest. The pipeline has a capacity of 62,000 BPD (based on
gasoline equivalents), and has the capacity for further expansion to 120,000 BPD. The cost of constructing this
pipeline including terminals and ethanol blending and storage facilities was approximately $410 million, which is
included under “Properties, plants and equipment” in our consolidated balance sheets. The pipeline was
mechanically complete in November 2011 and initial start-up activities commenced in December 2011. We have an
option agreement with HEP granting them an option to purchase all of our equity interests in this joint venture
pipeline at a purchase price equal to our investment in this joint venture pipeline plus interest at 7% per annum.
NOTE 12: Environmental Costs
Consistent with our accounting policy for environmental remediation costs, we expensed $14 million, ($0.6) million
and $4.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for environmental
remediation obligations. The accrued environmental liability reflected in the consolidated balance sheets was $42.2
million and $26.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of which $31.7 million and $20.4 million,
respectively, was classified as other long-term liabilities. These amounts include $7.3 million in environmental
liabilities that we assumed in connection with our merger with Frontier in July 2011. Future expenditures for
environmental remediation that are expected to be incurred over the next several years are not discounted to their
present value.
NOTE 13: Debt
HollyFrontier Credit Agreement
On July 1, 2011, we entered into a $1 billion senior secured credit agreement (the “HollyFrontier Credit
Agreement”) with Union Bank, N.A. as administrative agent and BNP Paribas as syndication agent, and certain
lenders from time to time party thereto, and terminated our previous $400 million credit agreement. Additionally,
Frontier terminated its previous $500 million credit agreement. The HollyFrontier Credit Agreement matures in July
2016 and may be used to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate
purposes. Obligations under the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement are collateralized by our inventory, accounts
receivables and certain deposit accounts and guaranteed by our material, wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We were in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding
borrowings and outstanding letters of credit totaling $6.1 million under the HollyFrontier Credit Agreement. At that
level of usage, the unused commitment was $993.9 million at December 31, 2011.
-86-
HEP Credit Agreement
At December 31, 2011, HEP had a $275 million senior secured revolving credit facility expiring in February 2016
(the “HEP Credit Agreement”) with an outstanding balance of $200 million. On February 3, 2012, the HEP Credit
Agreement was amended, increasing the size of the credit facility from $275 million to $375 million (the “HEP
Amended Credit Agreement”) and is available to fund capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, distribution
payments and working capital and for general partnership purposes. It is also available to fund letters of credit up to
a $50 million sub-limit and to fund distributions to unitholders up to a $30 million sub-limit. The HEP Amended
Credit Agreement expires in February 2016; however, in the event that the 6.25% HEP senior notes (discussed later)
are not repurchased, defeased, refinanced, extended or repaid prior to September 1, 2014, the HEP Amended Credit
Agreement will expire on that date.
HEP’s obligations under the HEP Amended Credit Agreement are collateralized by substantially all of HEP’s assets
(presented parenthetically in our consolidated balance sheets). Indebtedness under the HEP Amended Credit
Agreement is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., its general partner, and guaranteed by HEP’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Any recourse to the general partner would be limited to the extent of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.’s
assets, which other than its investment in HEP, are not significant. HEP’s creditors have no other recourse to our
assets. Furthermore, our creditors have no recourse to the assets of HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
HollyFrontier Senior Notes
Our senior notes consist of the following:
•
•
•
9.875% Senior Notes ($291.8 million principal amount maturing June 2017)
6.875% Senior Notes ($150 million principal amount maturing November 2018)(1)
8.5% Senior Notes ($200 million principal amount maturing September 2016)(1)
(1) Represent senior notes assumed upon our July 1, 2011 merger with Frontier.
In June 2009, we issued $200 million in aggregate principal amount of the 9.875% Senior Notes maturing June 15,
2017. A portion of the $187.9 million in net proceeds received was used for post-closing payments for inventories
of crude oil and refined products acquired from Sunoco following the closing of the Tulsa West facility purchase on
June 1, 2009. In October 2009, we issued an additional $100 million aggregate principal amount as an add-on
offering to the 9.875% Senior Notes that was used to fund the cash portion of our acquisition of the Tulsa East
facility.
We have additional senior notes that we assumed as a result of our July 1, 2011 merger with Frontier; the 6.875%
Senior Notes having an aggregate principal amount of $150 million maturing November 15, 2018 and the 8.5%
Senior Notes having an aggregate principal amount of $200 million maturing September 15, 2016.
These senior notes (collectively, the “HollyFrontier Senior Notes”) are unsecured and impose certain restrictive
covenants, including limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, incur liens, enter into sale-and-leaseback
transactions, pay dividends, enter into mergers, sell assets and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. At any
time when the HollyFrontier Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s and
no default or event of default exists, we will not be subject to many of the foregoing covenants. Additionally, we
have certain redemption rights under each of the HollyFrontier Senior Notes.
HollyFrontier Financing Obligation
In October 2009, we sold approximately 400,000 barrels of crude oil tankage at our Tulsa West facility as well as
certain crude oil pipeline receiving facilities to an affiliate of Plains for $40 million in cash. In connection with this
transaction, we entered into a 15-year lease agreement with Plains, whereby we agreed to pay a fixed monthly fee
for the exclusive use of this tankage as well as a fee for volumes received at the receiving facilities purchased by
Plains. Additionally, we have a margin sharing agreement with Plains under which we will equally share contango
profits with Plains for crude oil purchased by them and delivered to our Tulsa West facility for storage. Due to our
continuing involvement in these assets, this sale and lease transaction has been accounted for as a financing
obligation. As a result, we retained these assets on our books and recorded a liability representing the $40 million in
proceeds received.
-87-
HEP Senior Notes
HEP’s senior notes consist of the following:
•
•
6.25% HEP Senior Notes ($185 million principal amount maturing March 2015)
8.25% HEP Senior Notes ($150 million principal amount maturing March 2018)
In March 2010, HEP issued $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.25% HEP Senior Notes maturing
March 15, 2018. A portion of the $147.5 million in net proceeds received was used to fund HEP’s $93 million
purchase of certain storage assets at our Tulsa East facility and Navajo Refinery Lovington facility on March 31,
2010. Additionally, HEP used a portion to repay $42 million in outstanding HEP Credit Agreement borrowings,
with the remaining proceeds available for general partnership purposes, including working capital and capital
expenditures.
HEP also has $185 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% HEP Senior Notes maturing March 1, 2015 that
are registered with the SEC.
These HEP senior notes (collectively, the “HEP Senior Notes”) are unsecured and impose certain restrictive
covenants, including limitations on HEP’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, sell assets,
incur certain liens, pay distributions, enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter into mergers. At any time
when the HEP Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s and no default or
event of default exists, HEP will not be subject to many of the foregoing covenants. Additionally, HEP has certain
redemption rights under the HEP Senior Notes.
Indebtedness under the HEP Senior Notes is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., its general partner, and
guaranteed by HEP’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. However, any recourse to the general partner would be limited to
the extent of HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.’s assets, which other than its investment in HEP, are not significant.
HEP’s creditors have no other recourse to our assets. Furthermore, our creditors have no recourse to the assets of
HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Consolidated Debt
The carrying amounts of long-term debt are as follows:
9.875% Senior Notes
Principal ...........................................................................................
Unamortized discount ......................................................................
6.875% Senior Notes
Principal ...........................................................................................
Unamortized premium .....................................................................
8.5% Senior Notes
Principal ...........................................................................................
Unamortized premium .....................................................................
Financing obligation
Principal ...........................................................................................
Total HollyFrontier long-term debt .......................................................
December 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
$
291,812
(8,930)
282,882
$ 300,000
(10,491)
289,509
150,000
6,490
156,490
199,985
11,905
211,890
37,620
688,882
-
-
-
-
-
-
38,781
328,290
-88-
December 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
HEP Credit Agreement ..........................................................................
200,000
159,000
HEP 6.25% Senior Notes
Principal ...........................................................................................
Unamortized discount ......................................................................
Unamortized premium – dedesignated fair value hedge ..................
HEP 8.25% Senior Notes
Principal ...........................................................................................
Unamortized discount ......................................................................
Total HEP long-term debt ......................................................................
185,000
(8,331)
1,098
177,767
150,000
(1,907)
148,093
525,860
185,000
(10,961)
1,444
175,483
150,000
(2,212)
147,788
482,271
Total long-term debt ..............................................................................
$ 1,214,742
$ 810,561
Principal maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
Years Ending December 31,
(In thousands)
2012 ................................................
2013 ................................................
2014 ................................................
2015 ................................................
2016 ................................................
Thereafter .......................................
$
1,309
1,477
201,666
186,880
202,106
620,979
Total ...............................................
$ 1,214,417
NOTE 14: Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Commodity Price Risk Management
Our primary market risk is commodity price risk. We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in crude
oil and refined products, as well as volatility in the price of natural gas used in our refining operations.
We periodically enter into derivative contracts in the form of commodity price swaps and futures contracts to
mitigate price exposure with respect to:
•
•
•
•
•
our inventory positions;
natural gas purchases;
costs of crude oil and related grade differentials;
prices of refined products; and
our refining margins.
As of December 31, 2011, we have outstanding swap contracts serving as cash flow hedges against price risk on
forecasted 2012 purchases of 14,640,000 barrels of WTI crude oil and forecasted sales of 7,320,000 barrels of ultra-
low sulfur diesel and 7,320,000 barrels of conventional unleaded gasoline. In the aggregate, these cash flow hedges
effectively hedge our gross margin on forecasted gasoline and diesel sales, totaling 40,000 BPD in 2012. These
contracts have been designated as accounting hedges and are measured quarterly at fair value with offsetting
adjustments (gains/losses) recorded directly to other comprehensive income. These fair value adjustments are later
reclassified in the income statement as the hedging instruments mature. Also on a quarterly basis, hedge
effectiveness is measured by comparing the change in fair value of the swap contracts against the expected future
cash inflows/outflows on the respective transaction being hedged. Any ineffectiveness is recorded to cost of
products sold. To date, ineffectiveness on these cash flow hedges have been insignificant.
-89-
We also have swap contracts that lock in the spread between gasoline and butane on forecasted sales (112,500
barrels of gasoline through January 2012) and NYMEX futures contracts to lock in prices on forecasted sales and
purchases of inventory (292,000 barrels and 411,000 barrels, respectively, through 2013). These contracts are
measured quarterly at fair value with offsetting adjustments (gains/losses) recorded directly to cost of products sold.
Interest Rate Risk Management
HEP uses interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to interest rate risk.
As of December 31, 2011 HEP has an interest rate swap contract that hedges its exposure to the cash flow risk
caused by the effects of LIBOR changes on a $155 million credit agreement advance. This interest rate swap
effectively converts $155 million of LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt having an interest rate of 0.99% plus an
applicable margin, currently 2.50%, which equaled an effective interest rate of 3.49% as of December 31, 2011. This
swap matures in February 2016. HEP has designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. To date,
ineffectiveness on this cash flow hedge has been insignificant.
Prior to entering into the swap contract in December 2011 (discussed above), HEP terminated its previous interest
rate swap that prior to settlement also served to hedge HEP’s exposure to the effects of LIBOR changes on the same
$155 million credit agreement advance. HEP terminated this swap at a cost of $6 million, to lock in a lower
effective interest rate on this $155 million advance, which by means of the previous swap contract was effectively
fixed at 6.24% at the time of termination.
At December 31, 2011, HEP had a pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss of $6.5 million that relates to its
current and previous cash flow hedging instruments. Of this amount, $6 million relates to the cash flow hedge
terminated in December 2011 and represents the application of hedge accounting prior to termination. This amount
will be amortized as a charge to interest expense through February 2013, the remaining term of the terminated swap
contract.
The following table presents balance sheet locations and related fair values of outstanding derivative instruments.
These amounts are presented on a gross basis in accordance with GAAP disclosure requirements and do not reflect
the netting of asset or liability positions permitted under the terms of master netting arrangements. Therefore, they
are not equal to amounts presented in our consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, we held $30 million of cash on
margin at December 31, 2011 to collateralize certain counterparty positions. These deposits have an offsetting
current liability on our balance sheet and are not included in the amounts below.
Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2011
Balance Sheet
Location
Fair Value
Location of Offsetting Balance
Offsetting
Amount
(In thousands)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Prepayments and
other current assets ..... $173,784
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (unrealized gain) ..................... $ 173,338
446
$ 173,784
Cost of products sold (decrease) .............
$173,784
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
Other long-term
liabilities .................... $
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (unrealized loss)...................... $
520
520
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Prepayments and
other current assets .... $ 1,870 Cost of products sold (decrease) ............ $ 1,870
Commodity price swap contracts
Accrued liabilities ....... $ 1,252 Cost of products sold (increase) ............. $ 1,252
December 31, 2010
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Accrued liabilities....... $
38
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(unrealized loss) ................................... $
38
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
Other long-term
liabilities .................... $ 10,026
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(unrealized loss) ................................... $ 10,026
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Commodity price swap contracts
Accrued liabilities....... $
497 Cost of products sold (increase) ............. $
497
-90-
At December 31, 2011, there was a pre-tax net unrealized gain of $172.8 million classified in accumulated other
comprehensive income that relates to our commodity cash flow hedges and HEP’s cash flow hedge of interest.
Assuming commodity prices and interest rates remain unchanged, an unrealized gain of approximately $173 million
will be effectively transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income into the income statement as the
hedging instruments mature over the next twelve-month period.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, maturities and fair value adjustments attributable to our economic hedges
resulted in decreases of $3.2 million to cost of products sold. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized
a $1.3 million charge to cost of products sold and a $0.4 million charge to operating expenses that are attributable to
losses resulting from fair value changes to our commodity price swap contracts.
HEP previously had interest rate swap contracts that served as economic hedges on interest attributable to
outstanding debt. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, HEP recognized $1.5 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, in non-cash charges to interest expense as a result of fair value changes to these swap contracts.
NOTE 15: Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the following:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Current
Federal .........................................................................................................
State .............................................................................................................
Deferred
Federal .........................................................................................................
State .............................................................................................................
(In thousands)
$
499,535
91,316
$
30,999
4,473
$ (24,876)
(2,266)
(9,679)
819
581,991
$
$
21,796
2,044
59,312
33,269
4,253
$ 10,380
The statutory federal income tax rate applied to pre-tax book income reconciles to income tax expense as follows:
2011
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
2009
Tax computed at statutory rate ........................................................................
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit ..................................................
Domestic production activities deduction ........................................................
Tax exempt interest .........................................................................................
Discontinued operations (including noncontrolling interest) ...........................
Noncontrolling interest in continuing operations ............................................
Tax settlement .................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
$
$
574,682
64,284
(32,194)
-
-
(14,221)
(12,125)
1,565
581,991
$
$
67,327
4,372
(940)
-
-
(11,315)
-
(132)
59,312
$ 15,331
1,708
-
(168)
7,720
(13,123)
-
(1,088)
$ 10,380
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Our deferred income
tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
-91-
Deferred taxes
Accrued employee benefits ............................................................
Accrued postretirement benefits ....................................................
Accrued environmental costs .........................................................
Inventory differences .....................................................................
Deferred turnaround costs ..............................................................
Prepayments and other ...................................................................
Total current ......................................................................................
Properties, plants and equipment (due primarily to
tax in excess of book depreciation) ............................................
Accrued postretirement benefits ....................................................
Accrued environmental costs.........................................................
Deferred turnaround costs .............................................................
Investment in HEP ........................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................
Total noncurrent ................................................................................
Total ..................................................................................................
Deferred taxes
Accrued employee benefits ............................................................
Accrued postretirement benefits ....................................................
Accrued environmental costs .........................................................
Inventory differences .....................................................................
Deferred turnaround costs ..............................................................
Prepayments and other ...................................................................
Total current(1) ...................................................................................
Properties, plants and equipment (due primarily to
tax in excess of book depreciation) ............................................
Accrued postretirement benefits ....................................................
Accrued environmental costs.........................................................
Deferred turnaround costs .............................................................
Investment in HEP .........................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................
Total noncurrent ................................................................................
Total ..................................................................................................
Assets
$
22,791
4,012
2,253
-
-
37,442
66,498
-
41,873
4,651
-
-
42,618
89,142
$ 155,640
Assets
$
9,235
2,126
556
258
-
4,458
16,633
-
15,761
947
-
74,640
11,626
102,974
$ 119,607
December 31, 2011
Liabilities
(In thousands)
$
-
-
-
(161,428)
(356)
(80,397)
(242,181)
(511,788)
-
-
(22,971)
(13,389)
(4,715)
(552,863)
$ (795,044)
Total
$
22,791
4,012
2,253
(161,428)
(356)
(42,955)
(175,683)
(511,788)
41,873
4,651
(22,971)
(13,389)
37,903
(463,721)
$ (639,404)
December 31, 2010
Liabilities
(In thousands)
Total
$
-
-
-
(8,612)
(356)
(2,874)
(11,842)
(207,861)
-
-
(23,326)
-
(3,722)
(234,909)
$ (246,751)
$
9,235
2,126
556
(8,354)
(356)
1,584
4,791
(207,861)
15,761
947
(23,326)
74,640
7,904
(131,935)
$ (127,144)
At December 31, 2011 we had a net operating loss carryforward of $46.9 million in the state of Colorado that is
scheduled to be utilized in 2012 through 2029 and a Kansas income tax credit of $31.2 million that is scheduled to
be utilized in 2012 through 2019. These amounts are reflected in other current and non-current deferred tax assets.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2011, was $2.4 million. A reconciliation of the
beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Liability for Unrecognized Tax Benefits
(In thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011 .................................................................................................
Additions due to merger with Frontier ...............................................................................
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year ..............................................
Additions for tax positions of prior years ...........................................................................
Reductions for tax positions of prior years .........................................................................
Settlements .........................................................................................................................
Reductions for statute limitations .......................................................................................
$
1,864
22,577
-
73
(204)
(21,679)
(206)
Balance at December 31, 2011 ...........................................................................................
$
2,425
-92-
Included in the unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2011 are $2.2 million of tax benefits that, if recognized,
would affect our effective tax rate. Unrecognized tax benefits are adjusted in the period in which new information
about a tax position becomes available or the final outcome differs from the amount recorded.
We recognize interest and penalties relating to liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as an element of tax expense.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized a $12.1 million tax benefit (net of interest) as a
component of tax expense. We have not recorded any penalties related to our uncertain tax positions as we believe
that it is more likely than not that there will not be any assessment of penalties. We do not expect that unrecognized
tax benefits for tax positions taken with respect to 2011 and prior years will significantly change over the next
twelve months.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, Arizona, Iowa, New Mexico, Utah, Oklahoma, Kansas and Colorado
income tax and to income tax of multiple other state jurisdictions. We have substantially concluded all U.S. federal,
state and local income tax matters for tax years through December 31, 2005. In late 2010, the Internal Revenue
Service commenced an examination of our U.S. federal tax returns for the tax years ended December 31, 2006,
2007, 2008 and 2009. We anticipate that these audits will be completed by the end of 2012.
NOTE 16: Stockholders’ Equity
Shares of our common stock outstanding and activity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is
presented below:
Common shares outstanding at beginning of year ...........................................
Common shares issued in connection with merger with Frontier ....................
Common shares issued to Sinclair in connection with Tulsa East
facility acquisition .......................................................................................
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options ..............................
Issuance of restricted stock, excluding restricted stock with performance
feature ..........................................................................................................
Vesting of performance units ..........................................................................
Vesting of restricted stock with performance feature ......................................
Forfeitures of restricted stock ..........................................................................
Purchase of treasury stock(1) ............................................................................
Common shares outstanding at end of year .....................................................
2011
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
2009
106,529,376
103,270,002
106,132,538
-
99,886,440
-
-
-
-
80,400
5,578,310
90,000
512,880
233,134
124,332
(3,730)
(1,333,348)
209,332,646
282,886
140,286
12,300
(30,084)
(88,950)
106,529,376
308,156
293,328
99,438
(3,266)
(119,868)
106,132,538
(1)
Includes 747,225, 88,950 and 119,868 shares purchased in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, under the terms of stock-based
compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at the vesting of share-based awards.
On August 3, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split, payable in the form of a common
stock dividend for each issued and outstanding share of our common stock. The stock dividend was paid August 31,
2011 to all shareholders of record on August 24, 2011. All references to share and per share amounts in these
consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been adjusted to reflect the effect of the stock split for
all periods presented.
In September 2011, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program of up to $100 million to repurchase
common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2011, we had
repurchased 586,123 shares at a cost of $17.8 million under this stock repurchase program.
In January 2012, our Board of Directors approved a $350 million stock repurchase program, which replaced the
existing $100 million stock repurchase program. The timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on
market conditions, corporate, regulatory and other relevant considerations. The stock repurchase program may be
discontinued at any time by the Board of Directors.
During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, we withheld shares of our common stock from certain
employees in the amounts of $24.9 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. These withholdings were
-93-
made under the terms of restricted stock and performance share unit agreements to provide funds for the payment of
payroll and income taxes due at the vesting of restricted and performance shares in the case of officers and
employees who elected to have shares withheld from vested amounts in order to pay such taxes. The amounts
withheld in 2011 also reflect withholdings associated with “change in control” instant vesting provisions of the
legacy Frontier stock awards.
NOTE 17: Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components and allocated tax effects of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
Before-Tax
Tax Expense
(Benefit)
(In thousands)
After-Tax
Year Ended December 31, 2011
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities .........................................
Unrealized gain on hedging activities ........................................................
Retirement medical obligation adjustment .................................................
Minimum pension liability adjustment ......................................................
Other comprehensive income ....................................................................
Less other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest .
Other comprehensive income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ..
Year Ended December 31, 2010
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities ........................................
Unrealized loss on hedging activities .........................................................
Retirement medical obligation adjustment .................................................
Minimum pension liability adjustment ......................................................
Other comprehensive loss ..........................................................................
Less other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest .......
Other comprehensive loss attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders .......
Year Ended December 31, 2009
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities ........................................
Unrealized gain on hedging activities ........................................................
Retirement medical obligation adjustment .................................................
Minimum pension liability adjustment ......................................................
Other comprehensive income ....................................................................
Less other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest .
Other comprehensive income attributable to HollyFrontier stockholders ..
$
$
$
$
$
$
(516)
176,936
(3,515)
(71)
172,834
2,815
170,019
114
(923)
(238)
(1,470)
(2,517)
(1,623)
(894)
409
3,726
742
12,497
17,374
2,021
15,353
$
$
$
$
$
$
(199)
67,732
(1,367)
(28)
66,138
-
66,138
42
275
(93)
(572)
(348)
-
(348)
158
663
289
4,862
5,972
-
5,972
$
$
$
$
$
$
(317)
109,204
(2,148)
(43)
106,696
2,815
103,881
72
(1,198)
(145)
(898)
(2,169)
(1,623)
(546)
251
3,063
453
7,635
11,402
2,021
9,381
The temporary unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities is due to changes in market prices of securities.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheets
includes:
December 31,
2011
2010
(In thousands)
Pension obligation adjustment .......................................................................................................
Retiree medical obligation adjustment ...........................................................................................
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale ............................................................................
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging activities, net of noncontrolling interest ..................................
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ..........................................................................
$ (22,715)
(4,042)
134
104,496
$ 77,873
$ (22,672)
(1,894)
451
(2,131)
$ (26,246)
-94-
NOTE 18: Retirement Plans
Retirement Plan
We sponsored a non-contributory defined benefit retirement plan that covered most legacy Holly non-union
employees hired prior to January 1, 2007 and union employees hired prior to July 1, 2010. This retirement plan was
closed to new entrants effective either January 1, 2007 (for non-union employees) or July 1, 2010 (for union
employees). Effective January 1, 2012, no additional benefits will be accrued under this plan for non-union
employees participants. There will be a transition benefit over the next three years for active employees who have
been
the
employer contribution feature of our defined contribution plan for all non-union employees.
to a new defined contribution plan. Additionally,
there will be changes
transitioned
in
Our funding policy for this defined benefit retirement plan is to make annual contributions of not less than the
minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Benefits are based on
the employee’s years of service and compensation.
The following table sets forth the changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets of our retirement plan for the
years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
Change in plan’s benefit obligation
Pension plan’s benefit obligation – beginning of year .....................................................
Service cost .....................................................................................................................
Interest cost .....................................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................................
Actuarial loss ...................................................................................................................
Settlements paid ..............................................................................................................
Curtailment ......................................................................................................................
Pension plan’s benefit obligation – end of year ...............................................................
Change in pension plan assets
Fair value of plan assets - beginning of year ....................................................................
Actual return on plan assets .............................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................................
Employer contributions ...................................................................................................
Settlements paid ...............................................................................................................
Fair value of plan assets - end of year ..............................................................................
Years Ended December 31,
2011
2010
(In thousands)
$
$
$
$
94,083
5,070
5,125
(1,347)
16,108
(10,510)
(15,151)
93,378
64,490
(1,235)
(1,347)
10,000
(10,510)
61,398
$
$
$
$
81,170
4,595
5,154
(4,825)
7,989
-
-
94,083
55,618
8,297
(4,825)
5,400
-
64,490
Funded status
Under-funded balance ......................................................................................................
$
(31,980)
$
(29,593)
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets
Accrued pension liability .................................................................................................
$
(31,980)
$
(29,593)
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
Actuarial loss ...................................................................................................................
Prior service cost .............................................................................................................
Total .................................................................................................................................
$
$
(35,094)
(966)
(36,060)
$
$
(33,750)
(2,420)
(36,170)
The accumulated benefit obligation was $86.1 million and $75.4 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The measurement dates used for our retirement plan were December 31, 2011 and 2010.
The weighted average assumptions used to determine end of period benefit obligations:
Discount rate .......................................................................................................................
Rate of future compensation increases ................................................................................
4.60%
4.00%
5.65%
4.00%
December 31,
2011
2010
-95-
Net periodic pension expense consisted of the following components:
2011
Years Ended December 31,
2010
(In thousands)
2009
Service cost – benefit earned during the year ..................................................
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations ..................................................
Expected return on plan assets .........................................................................
Amortization of prior service cost ...................................................................
Amortization of net loss ..................................................................................
Effect of settlements ........................................................................................
Effect of curtailment ........................................................................................
Net periodic pension expense ..........................................................................
$
5,070
5,125
(5,230)
390
2,126
3,951
1,065
$ 12,497
$
$
4,595
5,154
(4,576)
390
2,196
-
-
7,759
$
$
4,314
4,943
(3,843)
390
3,815
-
-
9,619
The weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit expense:
Discount rate ...................................................................................................
Rate of future compensation increases ............................................................
Expected long-term rate of return on assets .....................................................
5.65%
4.00%
8.00%
6.20%
4.00%
8.50%
6.50%
4.00%
8.50%
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic
benefit expense in 2012 are as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2009
2011
Actuarial loss ...................................................................................................
Prior service cost .............................................................................................
Total ................................................................................................................
$
$
2,337
185
2,522
At year end, our retirement plan assets were allocated as follows:
(In thousands)
Asset Category
Debt securities .................................................................................................
Equity securities ..............................................................................................
Alternative investments ...................................................................................
Total ................................................................................................................
Percentage of Plan Assets at
Year End
December 31,
2011
December 31,
2010
62%
30%
8%
100%
30%
66%
4%
100%
Target
Allocation
2012
60%
32%
8%
100%
The investment policy developed for the HollyFrontier Corporation Pension Plan (the “Plan”) has been designed
exclusively for the purpose of providing the highest probabilities of delivering benefits to Plan members and
beneficiaries. Among the factors considered in developing the investment policy are: the Plans’ primary investment
goal, rate of return objective, investment risk, investment time horizon, role of asset classes and asset allocation.
The most important component of the investment strategy is the asset allocation between the various classes of
securities available to the Plan for investment purposes. The current target asset allocation is 32% equity
investments, 60% fixed income investments and 8% alternative investments. Equity investments include a blend of
domestic growth and value stocks of various sizes of capitalization and international stocks. Debt investments
include a blend of domestic and global debt instruments. Alternative investments include a single fund that may
invest in hedge funds, private equity, debt or real estate funds or other investments. The equity investments are
valued using quoted market prices, a Level 1 input and debt investments are valued using quoted market prices for
similar type investments, a Level 2 input. The alternative investments may be valued using significant other
observable or unobservable inputs, Level 2 or 3 inputs. See Note 4, Financial Instruments, for information on Level
1, 2 and 3 inputs.
-96-
The overall expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets is 6.5% and is estimated using a financial simulation
model of asset returns. Model assumptions are derived using historical data given the assumption that capital
markets are informationally efficient.
We expect to contribute between zero and $20 million to the retirement plan in 2012. Benefit payments, which
reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid as follows: $5.9 million in 2012; $7.6 million in 2013; $7.2
million in 2014; $6.4 million in 2015, $6.7 million in 2016 and $38.4 million in 2017-2021.
Retirement Restoration Plan
We adopted an unfunded retirement restoration plan that provides for additional payments from us so that total
retirement plan benefits for certain executives will be maintained at the levels provided in the retirement plan before
the application of Internal Revenue Code limitations. Effective January 1, 2012, no additional benefits will be
accrued under this plan. We expensed $0.6 million, $0.6 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31,
2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, in connection with this plan. The accrued liability reflected in the consolidated
balance sheets was $6.7 million and $6.2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31,
2011, the projected benefit obligation under this plan was $6.7 million. Benefit payments, which reflect expected
future service, are expected to be paid as follows: $1.4 million in 2012; $0.5 million in 2013; $1.5 million in 2014;
$0.4 million in 2015; $0.4 million in 2016; and $2.2 million in 2017-2021.
Defined Contribution Plans
We have defined contribution “401(k)” plans that cover substantially all employees. Our contributions are based on
employee’s compensation and partially match employee contributions. We expensed $9.7 million, $5.5 million and
$5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, in connection with these plans.
Postretirement Medical Plans
We provide postretirement medical benefits to certain eligible employees. These plans are unfunded and provide
differing levels of benefits dependent upon hire date and work location. Not all of our employees are covered by
these plans at December 31, 2011.
The following table sets forth the changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets of our postretirement plans for the
years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
(In thousands)
Change in plans’ benefit obligation
Postretirement plans’ benefit obligation – beginning of year ..........................................
Service cost .....................................................................................................................
Interest cost .....................................................................................................................
Participant contributions ..................................................................................................
Amendments ....................................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................................
Plan combinations ...........................................................................................................
Actuarial loss ...................................................................................................................
Postretirement plans’ benefit obligation – end of year ....................................................
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets - beginning of year ....................................................................
Employer contributions ...................................................................................................
Participant contributions ..................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................................
Fair value of plan assets - end of year ..............................................................................
Funded status
Under-funded balance ......................................................................................................
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets
Accrued postretirement liability ......................................................................................
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
Actuarial loss ...................................................................................................................
Transition obligation ........................................................................................................
Prior service cost .............................................................................................................
Total .................................................................................................................................
$
$
$
$
7,862
1,569
2,193
460
(5,387)
(1,105)
62,632
9,079
77,303
-
645
460
(1,105)
-
$
(77,303)
$
(77,303)
$
$
11,631
-
(4,997)
6,634
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,622
926
351
244
-
(661)
-
380
7,862
-
417
244
(661)
-
(7,862)
(7,862)
2,667
434
-
3,101
-97-
The accumulated benefit obligation was $77.3 million and $7.9 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The measurement dates used for our postretirement plans were December 31, 2011 and 2010. Benefit
payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid as follows: $1.6 million in 2012; $2 million
in 2013; $2.3 million in 2014; $2.6 million in 2015; $3 million in 2016; and $21.4 million in 2017 through 2021.
The weighted average assumptions used to determine end of period benefit obligations:
December 31,
2011
2010
Discount rate .......................................................................................................................
Current health care trend rate ..............................................................................................
Ultimate health care trend rate .............................................................................................
Year rate reaches ultimate trend rate ...................................................................................
4.60%
8.40%
5.00%
2023
5.25%
8.70%
5.00%
2023
Net periodic postretirement expense consisted of the following components:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Service cost – benefit earned during the year ..................................................
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations ..................................................
Amortization of transition obligation ..............................................................
Amortization of net loss ..................................................................................
Net periodic postretirement expense ...............................................................
$
$
1,569
2,193
44
114
3,920
$
(In thousands)
926
351
44
98
1,419
$
$
$
583
400
44
139
1,166
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement health care
benefit plans. The weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit expense follow:
Years Ended December 31,
2010
2011
2009
Discount rate ...................................................................................................
Current health care trend rate ..........................................................................
Ultimate health care trend rate .........................................................................
Year rate reaches ultimate trend rate ...............................................................
5.75%
8.70%
5.00%
2023
5.50%
9.00%
5.00%
2023
6.25%
10.00%
6.00%
2017
The effect of a 1% change in health care cost trend rates is as follows:
1% Point
Increase
1% Point
Decrease
(In thousands)
Service cost .........................................................................................................................
Interest cost .........................................................................................................................
Year-end accumulated postretirement benefit obligation ....................................................
$
$
$
351
416
16,917
$
$
$
(270)
(305)
(11,911)
NOTE 19: Lease Commitments
We lease certain facilities and equipment under operating leases, most of which contain renewal options. At
December 31, 2011, the minimum future rental commitments under operating leases having non-cancellable lease
terms in excess of one year are as follows:
2012..................................................................
2013..................................................................
2014..................................................................
2015..................................................................
2016..................................................................
Thereafter .........................................................
Total .................................................................
(in thousands)
31,888
$
29,589
27,259
20,260
16,412
8,947
$ 134,355
-98-
Rental expense charged to operations was $27 million, $13.3 million and $11.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009 includes $7.4 million, $7.1 million and $7.1 million, respectively, of rental expense attributable to the
operations of HEP.
NOTE 20: Contingencies and Contractual Obligations
We are a party to various litigation and proceedings which we believe, based on advice of counsel, will not either
individually or in the aggregate have a materially adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
Contractual Obligations
We have various long-term purchase obligations under certain crude oil and feedstock arrangements to ensure we
have an adequate supply of crude oil and certain resources used to operate our refineries. The substantial majority of
our purchase obligations are based on market prices or rates. These contracts expire in 2012 through 2023.
We also have contractual obligations under agreements with third parties for the transportation and storage of crude
oil, natural gas and feedstocks to our refineries under contracts expiring in 2016 through 2024.
NOTE 21: Segment Information
Our operations are organized into two reportable segments, Refining and HEP. Our operations that are not included
in the Refining and HEP segments are included in Corporate and Other. Intersegment transactions are eliminated in
our consolidated financial statements and are included in Consolidations and Eliminations.
The Refining segment represents the aggregate operations of El Dorado, Tulsa, Navajo, Cheyenne and Woods Cross
Refineries and NK Asphalt. Refining activities involve the purchase and refining of crude oil and wholesale and
branded marketing of refined products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel. These petroleum products are
primarily marketed in the Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States.
Additionally, the Refining segment includes specialty lubricant products produced at our Tulsa Refineries that are
marketed throughout North America and are distributed in Central and South America. NK Asphalt operates
various asphalt terminals in Arizona and New Mexico.
The HEP segment includes all of the operations of HEP, a consolidated VIE, which owns and operates logistic
assets consisting of petroleum product and crude oil pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities in the
Mid-Continent, Southwest and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States. Revenues are generated by charging
tariffs for transporting petroleum products and crude oil through its pipelines, by leasing certain pipeline capacity to
Alon USA, Inc., by charging fees for terminalling refined products and other hydrocarbons and storing and
providing other services at its storage tanks and terminals. The HEP segment also includes a 25% interest in SLC
Pipeline that serves refineries in the Salt Lake City, Utah area. Revenues from the HEP segment are earned through
transactions with unaffiliated parties for pipeline transportation, rental and terminalling operations as well as
revenues relating to pipeline transportation services provided for our refining operations. Our revaluation of HEP’s
assets and liabilities at March 1, 2008 (date of reconsolidation) resulted in basis adjustments to our consolidated
HEP balances. Therefore, our reported amounts for the HEP segment may not agree to amounts reported in HEP’s
periodic public filings.
The accounting policies for our segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies (see Note 1).
-99-
Refining(1)
HEP
Consolidations
and
Eliminations
Consolidated
Total
Corporate
and Other
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2011
Sales and other revenues ...................... $ 15,392,430
122,437
Depreciation and amortization ............. $
Income (loss) from operations .............. $ 1,739,068
Capital expenditures ............................. $
148,699
Total assets ........................................... $ 7,018,804
$ 213,566
$ 31,530
$ 113,258
$ 39,337
$ 992,408
1,247
$
6,568
$
(120,833)
$
$
186,205
$ 2,421,140
Year Ended December 31, 2010
Sales and other revenues ...................... $ 8,287,000
84,587
Depreciation and amortization ............. $
Income (loss) from operations .............. $
242,466
186,441
Capital expenditures ............................. $
Total assets ........................................... $ 2,490,193
Year Ended December 31, 2009
Sales and other revenues ...................... $ 4,789,821
67,347
Depreciation and amortization ............. $
71,281
Income (loss) from operations .............. $
Capital expenditures ............................. $
266,648
Total assets ........................................... $ 2,142,317
$ 182,114
$ 29,062
$ 92,386
$ 25,103
$ 669,820
$ 146,561
$ 24,599
$ 70,373
$ 32,999
$ 641,775
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
415
4,562
(69,654)
1,688
573,531
(636)
6,805
(60,239)
2,904
392,007
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(167,715)
(828)
55
-
(117,731)
$ 15,439,528
$
159,707
$ 1,731,548
$
374,241
$ 10,314,621
(146,600)
(682)
(2,200)
-
(32,069)
$ 8,322,929
117,529
$
$
262,998
213,232
$
$ 3,701,475
(101,478)
-
(1,104)
-
(30,160)
$ 4,834,268
98,751
$
80,311
$
$
302,551
$ 3,145,939
(1) The Refining segment reflects the operations of the El Dorado and Cheyenne Refineries beginning July 1, 2011 (date of
Holly-Frontier merger) and the operations of our Tulsa West and East facilities beginning June 1, 2009 and December
1, 2009, respectively (dates of acquisition).
HEP segment revenues from external customers were $46.4 million, $36 million and $45.5 million for the years
ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 22: Supplemental Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information
Our obligations under the HollyFrontier Senior Notes have been jointly and severally guaranteed by the substantial
majority of our existing and future restricted subsidiaries (“Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries”). These guarantees
are full and unconditional. HEP, in which we have a 42% ownership interest, and its subsidiaries (collectively,
“Non-Guarantor Non-Restricted Subsidiaries”), and certain of our other subsidiaries (“Non-Guarantor Restricted
Subsidiaries”) have not guaranteed these obligations.
The following financial information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets, statements of income, and
statements of cash flows of HollyFrontier Corporation (the “Parent”), the Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries, the
Non-Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Non-Restricted Subsidiaries. The information has
been presented as if the Parent accounted for its ownership in the Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries, and the
Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries accounted for the ownership of the Non-Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries and
Non-Guarantor Non-Restricted Subsidiaries, using the equity method of accounting. The Guarantor Restricted
Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Restricted Subsidiaries are collectively the “Restricted Subsidiaries.”
Our revaluation of HEP’s assets and liabilities at March 1, 2008 (date of reconsolidation) resulted in basis
adjustments to our consolidated HEP balances. Therefore, our reported amounts for the HEP segment may not agree
to amounts reported in HEP’s periodic public filings.
-100-
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2011
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
Eliminations
(In thousands)
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
$ 1,575,891
210,886
8,317
$
(3,358)
753
1,437,434
$
$
3,102
-
3,074
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Marketable securities
Accounts receivable
Intercompany accounts receivable
(payable)
Inventories
Income taxes receivable
Prepayments and other assets
Total current assets
3,075,563
-
87,273
19,379
4,977,309
(3,374,597)
1,113,136
4
202,428
(624,200)
2,043,257
-
593,118
2,242,197
$ 4,254,372
299,034
-
-
1,089
306,299
398,984
-
Properties, plants and equipment, net
Marketable securities (long-term)
Investment in subsidiaries
Intangibles and other assets
Total assets
26,702
50,067
1,160,801
19,329
$ 6,234,208
-
-
(1,513,859)
-
$ (1,513,859)
(240,060)
-
$ 465,223
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Income taxes payable
Accrued liabilities
Deferred income tax liabilities
Total current liabilities
$
23,497
(109,320)
53,390
192,073
159,640
$ 2,232,831
149,686
103,636
(16,390)
2,469,763
$
$
10,999
-
1,236
-
12,235
-
-
-
-
-
Long-term debt
Deferred income tax liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Distributions in excess of inv in HEP
Equity – HollyFrontier Corporation
Equity – noncontrolling interest
Total liabilities and equity
651,261
162,021
116,443
-
5,144,843
-
$ 6,234,208
54,070
295,893
52,892
220,953
1,160,801
-
$ 4,254,372
-
856
-
-
452,132
-
$ 465,223
-
-
-
-
(1,612,933)
99,074
$ (1,513,859)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
1,575,635
211,639
1,448,825
-
1,113,136
87,277
222,896
4,659,408
2,468,943
50,067
-
2,261,526
9,439,944
2,267,327
40,366
158,262
175,683
2,641,638
705,331
458,770
169,335
220,953
5,144,843
99,074
9,439,944
$
$
$
$
3,269
-
34,071
-
1,483
-
1,161
39,984
590,243
-
-
364,893
995,120
11,406
-
16,285
-
27,691
598,761
-
4,000
-
364,668
-
995,120
$
-
-
(35,661)
$ 1,578,904
211,639
1,447,235
-
-
-
(4,607)
(40,268)
-
1,114,619
87,277
219,450
4,659,124
(6,281)
-
-
3,052,905
50,067
-
2,552,525
$ (120,443) $ 10,314,621
(73,894)
$
(35,661) $ 2,243,072
40,366
169,940
175,683
2,629,061
-
(4,607)
-
(40,268)
(89,350)
4,951
(2,138)
(220,953)
(305,501)
532,816
1,214,742
463,721
171,197
-
5,204,010
631,890
$ (120,443) $ 10,314,621
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
Eliminations
(In thousands)
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Marketable securities
Accounts receivable
Intercompany accounts receivable
(payable)
Inventories
Income taxes receivable
Prepayments and other assets
Total current assets
$
230,082
-
1,683
$
(9,035)
1,343
991,778
$
7,651 $
-
-
(1,401,580)
-
51,034
10,210
(1,108,571)
981,691
400,165
-
20,942
2,386,884
419,889
-
-
-
427,540
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Properties, plants and equipment, net
Investment in subsidiaries
Intangibles and other assets
Total assets
17,177
2,273,159
8,569
$ 1,190,334
1,017,877
595,888
77,600
$ 4,078,249
236,648
(393,011)
-
$ 271,177
-
(2,476,036)
-
$ (2,476,036)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Total current liabilities
$
7,170
25,512
32,682
$ 1,319,316
28,145
1,347,461
$
$
3,575
797
4,372
-
-
-
Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred income tax liabilities
Distributions in excess of inv in HEP
Equity – HollyFrontier Corporation
Equity – noncontrolling interest
Total liabilities and equity
289,509
42,655
126,160
-
699,328
-
$ 1,190,334
55,706
27,521
259
374,143
2,273,159
-
$ 4,078,249
-
-
565
-
266,240
-
$ 271,177
-
-
-
-
(2,539,399)
63,363
$ (2,476,036)
-101-
$
$
228,698
1,343
993,461
-
400,165
51,034
31,152
1,705,853
1,271,702
-
86,169
3,063,724
1,330,061
54,454
1,384,515
345,215
70,176
126,984
374,143
699,328
63,363
3,063,724
$
$
$
$
$
$
403
-
22,508
-
202
-
573
23,686
492,098
-
154,036
669,820
10,238
21,206
31,444
482,271
10,809
-
-
145,296
-
669,820
$
$
-
-
(22,853)
-
-
-
(3,251)
(26,104)
229,101
1,343
993,116
-
400,367
51,034
28,474
1,703,435
(7,109)
-
1,144
1,756,691
-
241,349
(32,069) $ 3,701,475
(22,853) $ 1,317,446
72,409
1,389,855
(3,251)
(26,104)
(16,925)
810,561
80,985
-
131,935
4,951
-
(374,143)
697,419
(147,205)
590,720
527,357
(32,069) $ 3,701,475
$
$
$
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Year Ended December 31, 2011
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries Eliminations
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
(In thousands)
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
Sales and other revenues
$
1,008
$ 15,392,446
$
223
$
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold
Operating expenses
General and administrative
expenses
Depreciation and amortization
-
-
12,844,333
687,381
111,093
4,165
2,445
123,082
Total operating costs and expenses
115,258
13,657,241
-
1,185
-
1,758
2,943
Income (loss) from operations
(114,250)
1,735,205
(2,720)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 15,393,677
$
213,566
$ (167,715)
$ 15,439,528
12,844,333
688,566
113,538
129,005
-
62,202
6,576
31,530
(164,255)
(2,687)
12,680,078
748,081
-
(828)
120,114
159,707
13,775,442
100,308
(167,770)
13,707,980
1,618,235
113,258
55
1,731,548
Other income (expense):
Earnings of equity method
investments
Interest income (expense)
Merger transaction costs
Income before income taxes
Income tax provision
1,771,022
(38,619)
(15,114)
1,717,289
1,603,039
581,757
38,546
(2,729)
-
35,817
1,771,022
-
Net income
1,021,282
1,771,022
40,674
55
-
40,729
38,009
-
38,009
(1,809,820)
-
-
(1,809,820)
(1,809,820)
-
40,422
(41,293)
(15,114)
(15,985)
1,602,250
581,757
(1,809,820)
1,020,493
2,552
(38,210)
-
(35,658)
77,600
234
77,366
(40,674)
2,464
-
(38,210)
(38,155)
-
2,300
(77,039)
(15,114)
(89,853)
1,641,695
581,991
(38,155)
1,059,704
Less net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to
HollyFrontier stockholders
-
-
-
789
789
-
(37,096)
(36,307)
$ 1,021,282
$ 1,771,022
$
38,009
$ (1,809,031)
$
1,021,282
$
77,366
$
(75,251)
$ 1,023,397
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Year Ended December 31, 2010
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries Eliminations
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
Sales and other revenues
$
412
$ 8,287,000
$
3
$
(In thousands)
$
-
8,287,415
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
$
182,114
$ (146,600)
$ 8,322,929
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold
Operating expenses
General and administrative
expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating costs and expenses
-
2,411
62,130
3,745
68,286
7,510,172
449,534
990
85,517
8,046,213
Income (loss) from operations
(67,874)
240,787
Other income (expense):
Earnings of equity method
investments
Interest income (expense)
Income before income taxes
Income tax provision
Net income
Less net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to
HollyFrontier stockholders
11
185
32
-
(113)
104
(101)
30,069
45
30,114
30,013
-
30,013
-
-
-
-
-
-
(295,403)
-
(295,403)
(295,403)
-
(295,403)
7,510,357
451,977
63,120
89,149
8,114,603
172,812
30,069
(39,249)
(9,180)
163,632
59,016
104,616
-
52,947
7,719
29,062
89,728
92,386
2,393
(36,245)
(33,852)
58,534
296
58,238
(143,208)
(510)
7,367,149
504,414
-
(682)
70,839
117,529
(144,400)
8,059,931
(2,200)
262,998
(30,069)
2,466
(27,603)
(29,803)
-
(29,803)
2,393
(73,028)
(70,635)
192,363
59,312
133,051
265,367
(33,838)
231,529
163,655
59,016
104,639
30,036
(5,456)
24,580
265,367
-
265,367
-
-
-
23
23
-
(29,110)
(29,087)
$
104,639
$
265,367
$
30,013
$
(295,380)
$
104,639
$
58,238
$
(58,913)
$
103,964
-102-
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Year Ended December 31, 2009
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries Eliminations
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
(In thousands)
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
Sales and other revenues
$
3,346
$
4,785,781
$
58
$
$
4,789,185
$
146,561
$ (101,478)
$ 4,834,268
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of products sold
Operating expenses
General and administrative
expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating costs and expenses
-
-
51,648
3,928
55,576
4,336,973
313,361
1,318
68,956
4,720,608
Income (loss) from operations
(52,230)
65,173
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(127,909)
-
-
-
(127,909)
900
-
(209)
1,268
1,959
(1,901)
33,052
44
-
-
33,096
31,643
1,096
1,480
(3,126)
31,093
96,266
(13,713)
(1,480)
-
81,073
28,843
10,295
18,548
-
18,548
96,266
31,195
(127,909)
-
-
-
96,266
31,195
(127,909)
-
-
-
96,266
31,195
(127,909)
18,100
-
44,003
7,586
24,599
76,188
70,373
(99,865)
(509)
4,238,008
356,855
-
-
60,343
98,751
(100,374)
4,753,957
(1,104)
80,311
-
(21,490)
1,986
(1,356)
(33,052)
(1,238)
(67)
1,356
(20,860)
(33,001)
49,513
(34,105)
20
49,493
19,780
69,273
(2,855)
(31,250)
(2,854)
(34,104)
-
(35,301)
1,919
(3,126)
(36,508)
43,803
7,460
36,343
16,926
53,269
-
-
-
448
448
-
(34,184)
(33,736)
$
18,548
$
96,266
$
31,195
$ (127,461)
$
18,548
$
69,273
$
(68,288)
$
19,533
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
Interest income (expense)
Other income (expense)
Acquisition costs
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes
Income tax provision
Income from continuing operations
Income from discontinued operations
Net income
Less net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to
HollyFrontier stockholders
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2011
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Cash flows from operating activities
$ 1,933,208
$
(690,318)
$
42,655
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
(In thousands)
1,285,545
$
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
$
93,119
$
(40,273)
$ 1,338,391
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to properties, plants and equipment
Additions to properties, plants and equipment – HEP
Investment in Sabine Biofuels
Increase in cash due to merger with Frontier
Purchases of marketable securities
Sales and maturities of marketable securities
Cash flows from financing activities
Net repayments under credit agreements – HEP
Proceeds from issuance of common units – HEP
Repayments under promissory notes
Purchase of treasury stock
Principal tender on senior notes
Contribution from joint venture partner
Capital contribution
Dividends
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation
Repayments under financing obligation
Purchase of units for HEP restricted grants
Deferred financing costs
Other financing activities, net
(7,585)
-
(9,125)
182
(561,899)
301,020
(163,002)
-
-
872,557
-
-
(164,317)
-
-
-
-
-
(277,407)
709,555
(164,317)
-
-
-
(42,795)
(8,203)
-
-
(252,133)
-
1,804
-
-
(8,665)
-
(309,992)
-
-
-
-
-
123,000
(5,887)
-
-
-
-
-
-
117,113
-
-
77,100
-
-
(89,500)
-
-
-
-
(1,160)
-
-
-
(13,560)
5,677
(9,035)
Cash and cash equivalents
Increase (decrease) for the period
Beginning of period
1,345,809
230,082
(4,549)
7,651
1,346,937
228,698
End of period
$ 1,575,891
$
(3,358)
$
3,102
$
1,575,635
$
3,269
$
-103-
-
(39,337)
-
-
-
-
(39,337)
41,000
75,815
(77,100)
-
-
-
5,887
-
(91,506)
-
-
(1,641)
(3,150)
(221)
(50,916)
2,866
403
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
40,632
-
-
-
-
(359)
40,273
(334,904)
(39,337)
(9,125)
872,739
(561,899)
301,020
228,494
41,000
75,815
-
(42,795)
(8,203)
33,500
-
(252,133)
(50,874)
1,804
(1,160)
(1,641)
(11,815)
(580)
(217,082)
-
-
-
1,349,803
229,101
$ 1,578,904
4,337,873
313,361
52,757
74,152
4,778,143
11,042
33,052
(12,573)
-
(3,126)
17,353
28,395
10,295
18,100
-
(334,904)
-
(9,125)
872,739
(561,899)
301,020
267,831
-
-
77,100
(42,795)
(8,203)
33,500
(5,887)
(252,133)
-
1,804
(1,160)
-
(8,665)
-
(206,439)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2010
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Cash flows from operating activities
$
140,934
$
74,234
$
1,268
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
(In thousands)
216,436
$
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment) Eliminations Consolidated
$
103,168
$
(36,349)
$
283,255
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to properties, plants and equipment
Additions to properties, plants and equipment – HEP
Proceeds from sale of assets
Cash flows from financing activities
Net repayments under credit agreements – HEP
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes – HEP
Repayments under financing obligation
Purchase of treasury stock
Contribution from joint venture partner
Dividends
Purchase price in excess of transferred basis in assets
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation
Deferred financing costs
Purchase of units for HEP restricted grants
Other
Cash and cash equivalents
Increase (decrease) for the period
Beginning of period
(1,573)
-
-
(1,573)
-
-
-
(1,368)
-
(31,868)
-
-
(1,094)
(2,627)
-
118
(36,839)
102,522
127,560
(105,434)
-
39,040
(66,394)
-
-
(1,444)
-
(57,000)
-
54,046
-
-
-
-
-
(4,398)
3,442
(12,477)
(81,122)
-
-
(81,122)
-
-
-
-
80,500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80,500
646
7,005
(188,129)
-
39,040
(149,089)
-
-
(1,444)
(1,368)
23,500
(31,868)
54,046
-
(1,094)
(2,627)
-
118
39,263
106,610
122,088
-
(60,629)
-
(60,629)
(47,000)
147,540
-
-
-
-
(57,560)
(84,426)
-
(494)
(2,704)
-
(44,644)
(2,105)
2,508
End of period
$
230,082
$
(9,035)
$
7,651
$
228,698
$
403
$
-
35,526
(39,040)
(188,129)
(25,103)
-
(3,514)
(213,232)
-
-
416
-
-
-
3,514
35,933
-
-
-
-
39,863
(47,000)
147,540
(1,028)
(1,368)
23,500
(31,868)
-
(48,493)
(1,094)
(3,121)
(2,704)
118
34,482
-
-
-
104,505
124,596
$
229,101
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31, 2009
Parent
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Restricted
Subsidiaries
Cash flows from operating activities
$
(277,912)
$
448,020
$
308
HollyFrontier
Corp. Before
Consolidation
of HEP
(In thousands)
$
170,416
Non-Guarantor
Non-Restricted
Subsidiaries
(HEP Segment)
Eliminations Consolidated
$
68,195
$
(27,066)
$
211,545
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to properties, plants and equipment
Additions to properties, plants and
equipment – HEP
Purchases of marketable securities
Sales and maturities of marketable securities
Acquisition of Tulsa Refineries
Acquisition of logistic assets
Investment in SLC Pipeline
Proceeds from the sale of assets
Proceeds from sale of Rio Grande
Net cash provided by (used for)
investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings under credit agreement - HEP
Proceeds from issuance of common units - HEP
Dividends
Distributions to noncontrolling interest
Purchase of treasury stock
Contribution from joint venture partner
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation
Deferred financing costs
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes
Proceeds from Plains financing transaction
Other financing activities, net
Net cash provided by financing activities
Cash and cash equivalents
Increase (decrease) for the period
Beginning of period
End of period
(2,904)
(215,343)
(51,305)
(269,552)
-
-
(269,552)
-
(175,892)
230,281
74,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(341,141)
-
-
83,280
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(175,892)
230,281
(267,141)
-
-
83,280
-
(128,079)
-
-
-
(25,665)
(25,500)
-
31,865
95,080
-
-
-
-
-
(83,280)
-
(32,999)
(175,892)
230,281
(267,141)
(25,665)
(25,500)
-
31,865
125,485
(473,204)
(51,305)
(399,024)
(147,379)
11,800
(534,603)
-
-
(30,123)
-
(1,214)
-
(1,209)
(8,842)
287,925
-
134
246,671
-
-
-
-
-
(39,450)
-
-
-
40,000
13,339
13,889
-
-
-
-
-
54,600
-
-
-
-
-
54,600
-
-
(30,123)
-
(1,214)
15,150
(1,209)
(8,842)
287,925
40,000
13,473
315,160
6,000
133,035
-
(62,688)
-
-
-
-
-
-
76
76,423
-
-
-
29,488
-
-
-
-
-
-
(14,222)
15,266
6,000
133,035
(30,123)
(33,200)
(1,214)
15,150
(1,209)
(8,842)
287,925
40,000
(673)
406,849
94,244
33,316
127,560
$
$
(11,295)
(1,182)
(12,477)
$
3,603
3,402
7,005
$
86,552
35,536
122,088
$
(2,761)
5,269
2,508
$
-
-
-
$
83,791
40,805
124,596
-104-
NOTE 23: Significant Customers
All revenues are domestic revenues, except for refining segment sales of gasoline and diesel fuel for export into
Mexico. We have two significant customers (Sinclair and Shell Oil), each accounting for 10% or more of our
annual revenues. Sinclair accounted for $2,035.1 million (13%) and $1,616 million (19%) of our revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and Shell Oil accounted for $1,540.6 million (10%) of our
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011. We had no significant customers accounting for 10% or more of
our annual revenues in 2009. Our export sales were to an affiliate of PEMEX and accounted for $370 million (2%),
$323.2 million (4%) and $188.6 million (4%) of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
NOTE 24: Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
First
Quarter
Year Ended December 31, 2011
Sales and other revenues ........................... $ 2,326,585
Operating costs and expenses ................... $ 2,167,486
159,099
Income from operations ............................ $
Income before income taxes ...................... $
140,022
Net income attributable to
HollyFrontier stockholders ..................... $
Net income per share attributable
to HollyFrontier stockholders - basic ..... $
Net income per share attributable to
HollyFrontier stockholders - diluted ...... $
Dividends per common share .................... $
Average number of shares of common
stock outstanding:
Basic ....................................................
Diluted .................................................
106,614
107,266
84,694
Year Ended December 31, 2010
Sales and other revenues ........................... $ 1,874,290
Operating costs and expenses ................... $ 1,897,034
(22,744)
Income (loss) from operations .................. $
Income (loss) before income taxes ............ $
(39,926)
Net income (loss) attributable to
HollyFrontier stockholders ..................... $
Net income (loss) per share attributable
to HollyFrontier stockholders - basic .....
Net income (loss) per share attributable
to HollyFrontier stockholders - diluted .. $
Dividends per common share .................... $
Average number of shares of common
stock outstanding:
Basic ...................................................
Diluted ................................................
106,188
106,188
(28,094)
$
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
(In thousands, except per share data)
Fourth
Quarter
Year
$ 2,967,133
$ 2,636,954
330,179
$
313,794
$
$ 5,173,398
$ 4,304,191
869,207
$
835,769
$
$ 4,972,412
$ 4,599,349
373,063
$
352,110
$
$ 15,439,528
$ 13,707,980
$ 1,731,548
$ 1,641,695
$
192,235
0.80 $
0.79 $
0.075 $
1.80
1.79
0.075
$
$
$
$
523,088
2.50
2.48
0.588
$
$
$
$
223,380
$ 1,023,397
1.07
1.06
0.600
$
$
$
6.46
6.42
1.338
106,730
107,340
209,583
210,579
209,319
210,159
158,486
159,294
$ 2,145,860
$ 2,013,696
132,164
$
112,320
$
$ 2,090,988
$ 1,983,370
107,618
$
90,884
$
$ 2,211,791
$ 2,165,831
45,960
$
29,085
$
$ 8,322,929
$ 8,059,931
262,998
$
192,363
$
$
66,162
(0.26) $
(0.26) $
$
0.075
0.62
0.62
0.075
$
$
$
$
51,177
0.48
0.48
0.075
$
$
$
$
14,719
0.14
0.13
0.075
$
$
$
$
103,964
0.98
0.97
0.300
106,412
106,816
106,420
107,134
106,516
107,246
106,436
107,218
-105-
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
We have had no change in, or disagreement with, our independent registered public accountants on matters
involving accounting and financial disclosure.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
have evaluated, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Exchange Act as of the
end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms. Based upon the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2011.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter
that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial
reporting.
See Item 8 for “Management’s Report on its Assessment of the Company’s Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting” and “Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
Item 9B. Other Information
There have been no events that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2011 that would need to be reported on Form 8-K
that have not previously been reported.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
The information required by Items 401, 405, 406 and 407(c)(3), (d)(4) and d(5) of Regulation S-K in response to
this item is set forth in our definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 16,
2012 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by Items 402 and 407(e)(4) and (e)(5) of Regulation S-K in response to this item is set
forth in our definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 16, 2012 and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The equity compensation plan information required by Item 201(d) and the information required by Item 403 of
Regulation S-K in response to this item is set forth in our definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on May 16, 2012 and is incorporated herein by reference.
-106-
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by Item 404 of Regulation S-K in response to this item is set forth in our definitive proxy
statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 16, 2012 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A in response to this item is set forth in our definitive proxy
statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 16, 2012 and is incorporated herein by
reference.
-107-
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this report
(1) Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page in
Form 10-K
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm..............................................
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 .........................................
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 ...........................................................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .....................................................................
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
(2) Index to Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the
consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
The Exhibit Index on pages 111 to 121 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K lists the exhibits that are filed
or furnished, as applicable, as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
-108-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
(Registrant)
/s/ Michael C. Jennings
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer
Date:
February 28, 2012
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and as of the date indicated.
Signature
Capacity
Date
/s/ Michael C. Jennings
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and
President
February 28, 2012
/s/ Douglas S. Aron
Douglas S. Aron
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 28, 2012
/s/ Scott C. Surplus
Scott C. Surplus
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
February 28, 2012
/s/ Denise C. McWatters
Denise C. McWatters
Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
February 28, 2012
/s/ Matthew P. Clifton
Matthew P. Clifton
/s/ Douglas Y. Bech
Douglas Y. Bech
/s/ Buford P. Berry
Buford P. Berry
/s/ Leldon Echols
Leldon Echols
/s/ R. Kevin Hardage
R. Kevin Hardage
Executive Chairman
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
Director
Director
Director
Director
-109-
/s/ Robert J. Kostelnik
Robert J. Kostelnik
/s/ James H. Lee
James H. Lee
/s/ Robert G. McKenzie
Robert G. McKenzie
/s/ Franklin Myers
Franklin Myers
/s/ Michael E. Rose
Michael E. Rose
/s/ Tommy A. Valenta
Tommy A. Valenta
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
February 28, 2012
-110-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibits are numbered to correspond to the exhibit table
in Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibit
Number
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Description
Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated October 19, 2009, by and between Holly Refining &
Marketing-Tulsa LLC, HEP Tulsa LLC and Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 21, 2009, File
No. 1-03876).
Amendment No. 1 to Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated December 1, 2009, by and
between Holly Refining & Marketing-Tulsa LLC, HEP Tulsa LLC and Sinclair Tulsa Refining
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed December 7, 2009, File No. 1-03876).
Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated April 15, 2009, by and between Holly Refining &
Marketing-Midcon, L.L.C. and Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 16, 2009, File No. 1-03876).
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Holly Corporation, North Acquisition, Inc. and Frontier
Oil Corporation, dated as of February 21, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of HollyFrontier Corporation (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed July 8, 2011, File No.
1-03876).
Amended and Restated Bylaws of HollyFrontier Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed November 8, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Indenture, dated February 28, 2005, among Holly Energy Partners, L.P. and Holly Energy
Finance Corp., the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
March 4, 2005, File No. 1-32225).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 10, 2005, among Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly
Energy Finance Corp., the Guarantors identified therein, and U.S. Bank National Association
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, File No. 1-32225).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated April 27, 2005, among Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly
Energy Finance Corp., the Guarantors identified therein, and U.S. Bank National Association
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, File No. 1-32225).
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated June 11, 2009, among Lovington-Artesia, L.L.C., Holly
Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other Guarantors identified therein, and
U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 1-03876).
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 29, 2009, among HEP SLC, LLC, Holly Energy
Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other Guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank
National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 1-03876).
-111-
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated July 13, 2009, among HEP Tulsa LLC, Holly Energy
Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other Guarantors named therein, and U.S. Bank
National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 1-03876).
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated December 15, 2009, among Roadrunner Pipeline, L.L.C.,
Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other Guarantors named therein, and
U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 1-03876).
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated April 14, 2010, among Holly Energy Storage- Tulsa LLC,
Holly Energy Storage-Lovington LLC, Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp.,
the other Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated June 4, 2010, among HEP Operations LLC, Holly Energy
Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 29, 2011, among Cheyenne Logistics LLC,
El Dorado Logistics LLC, Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other
Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 of
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31,
2011, File No. 1-32225).
Form of 6.25% Senior Note Due 2015 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture included as Exhibit
4.1 hereto) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2005, File No. 1-32225).
Form of Notation of Guarantee (included as Exhibit E to the Indenture included as Exhibit 4.1
hereto) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2005, File No. 1-32225).
Indenture, dated as of September 17, 2008, among HollyFrontier Corporation, as issuer (as
successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as trustee, providing for the issuance of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2016
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report filed September
17, 2008, File Number 1-07627).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 17, 2008, among HollyFrontier Corporation,
as issuer (as successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (supplemental to Indenture dated September
17, 2008, providing for the issuance of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report filed September 17, 2008, File Number 1-
07627).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation, as
issuer (as successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (supplemental to Indenture dated September 17,
2008, providing for the issuance of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report filed May 27, 2011, File Number 1-07627).
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated July 1, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation, as issuer (as
successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as trustee (supplemental to Indenture dated September 17, 2008,
providing for the issuance of 8.5% Senior Notes due 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.2 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed July 8, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
-112-
4.17
4.18
4.19
Form of global note for 8.5% Senior Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of
Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report filed September 17, 2008, File Number 1-07627).
Indenture, dated June 10, 2009, among Holly Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named
therein and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, relating to Holly Corporation’s
9.875% Senior Notes due 2017 (includes the form of certificate for the notes issued thereunder)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed June 8,
2009, File No. 1-03876).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 14, 2011, among Holly Corporation, the subsidiary
guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, relating to
HollyFrontier Corporation’s 9.875% Senior Notes due 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended June 30, 2011,
File No. 1-03876).
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.27
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated July 18, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation, the
subsidiary guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee
(supplemental to Indenture dated June 10, 2009, providing for the issuance of 9.875% Senior
Notes due 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Indenture, dated March 10, 2010, among Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp.
and each of the guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
March 11, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 14, 2010, among Holly Energy Storage-Tulsa LLC,
Holly Energy Storage-Lovington LLC, Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp.,
the other Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.3 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 4, 2010, among HEP Operations LLC, Holly Energy
Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National
Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated December 29, 2011, among Cheyenne Logistics LLC, El
Dorado Logistics LLC, Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy Finance Corp., the other
Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 of
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31,
2011, File No. 1-32225).
Indenture, dated as of November 22, 2010, among HollyFrontier Corporation, as issuer (as
successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as trustee, providing for the issuance of 6 7/8% Senior Notes due 2018
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report dated November
22, 2010, File Number 1-07627).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 22, 2010, among HollyFrontier Corporation,
as issuer (as successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and
to Indenture dated
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
November 22, 2010, providing for the issuance of 6 7/8% Senior Notes due 2018) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report dated November 22, 2010, File
Number 1-07627).
trustee (supplemental
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 26, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation, as
issuer (as successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (supplemental to Indenture dated November 22,
-113-
4.28
4.29
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
2010, providing for the issuance of 6 7/8% Senior Notes due 2018) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report dated May 27, 2011, File Number 1-07627).
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated July 1, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation, as issuer (as
successor-in-interest to Frontier Oil Corporation), the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as trustee (supplemental to Indenture dated November 22, 2010,
providing for the issuance of 6 7/8% Senior Notes due 2018) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed July 8, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Form of global note for 6 7/8% Senior Notes due 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of
Frontier’s Form 8-K Current Report filed November 22, 2010, File Number 1-07627).
Option Agreement, dated January 31, 2008, by and among Holly Corporation, Holly UNEV
Pipeline Company, Navajo Pipeline Co., L.P., Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C., HEP Logistics
Holdings, L.P., Holly Energy Partners, L.P., HEP Logistics GP, L.L.C. and Holly Energy
Partners — Operating, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed February 5, 2008, File No. 1-03876).
First Amendment to Option Agreement, dated February 11, 2010, by and among Holly
Corporation, Holly UNEV Pipeline Company, Navajo Pipeline Co., L.P., Holly Logistic
Services, L.L.C., HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., Holly Energy Partners, L.P., HEP Logistics GP,
L.L.C. and Holly Energy Partners - Operating, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of
Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, File No.
1-03876).
Amended and Restated Intermediate Pipelines Agreement, dated June 1, 2009, by and among
Holly Corporation, Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C., Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly
Energy Partners — Operating, L.P., HEP Pipeline, L.L.C., Lovington-Artesia, L.L.C., HEP
Logistics Holdings, L.P., Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C. and HEP Logistics GP, L.L.C.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Form 8-K Current
Report filed June 5, 2009, File No. 1-32225).
Amendment to Amended and Restated Intermediate Pipelines Agreement, dated December 9,
2010, among Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C., Holly Energy Partners, L.P., Holly Energy
Partners – Operating, L.P., HEP Pipeline, L.L.C., Lovington-Artesia, L.L.C., HEP Logistics
Holdings, L.P., Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C., and HEP Logistics GP, L.L.C. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Amended and Restated Intermediate Pipelines
Agreement), effective January 1, 2011, between Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C. and Holly
Refining & Marketing Company LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
Tulsa Equipment and Throughput Agreement, dated August 1, 2009, between Holly Refining &
Marketing – Tulsa LLC and HEP Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Holly
Energy Partners L.P.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed August 6, 2009, File No. 1-32225).
Amendment to Tulsa Equipment and Throughput Agreement, dated December 9, 2010, among
Holly Refining & Marketing – Tulsa LLC and HEP Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31,
2010, File No. 1-03876).
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Tulsa Equipment and Throughput Agreement),
effective January 1, 2011, between Holly Refining & Marketing – Tulsa, LLC and Holly
Refining & Marketing Company LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
-114-
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
Tulsa Purchase Option agreement, dated August 1, 2009, between Holly Refining & Marketing –
Tulsa LLC and HEP Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Holly Energy
Partners L.P.’s Form 8-K Current Report filed August 6, 2009, File No. 1-32225).
Amended and Restated Crude Pipelines and Tankage Agreement, dated December 1, 2009, by and
among Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C., Holly Refining & Marketing Company — Woods
Cross, Holly Refining & Marketing Company, Holly Energy Partners-Operating, L.P., HEP
Pipeline, L.L.C. and HEP Woods Cross, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 7, 2009, File No. 1-
32225).
Letter Agreement, dated October 14, 2011, regarding the Amended and Restated Crude Pipelines
and Tankage Agreement, dated December 1, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of
the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period ended September 30, 2011,
File No. 1-03876).
Amended and Restated Refined Product Pipelines and Terminals Agreement, dated December 1,
2009, by and among Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C., Holly Refining & Marketing Company
— Woods Cross, Holly Energy Partners-Operating, L.P., HEP Pipeline Assets, Limited
Partnership, HEP Pipeline, L.L.C., HEP Refining Assets, L.P., HEP Refining, L.L.C., HEP
Mountain Home, L.L.C. and HEP Woods Cross, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9
of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 7, 2009, File No. 1-
32225).
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Amended and Restated Refined Product Pipelines and
Terminals Agreement), effective January 1, 2011, among Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C.,
Holly Refining & Marketing-Woods Cross and Holly Refining & Marketing Company LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
Pipeline Throughput Agreement, dated December 1, 2009, by and between Navajo Refining
Company, L.L.C. and Holly Energy Partners-Operating, L.P. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 7,
2009, File No. 1-32225).
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Pipeline Throughput Agreement (Roadrunner)),
effective January 1, 2011, between Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C. and Holly Refining &
Marketing Company LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
First Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage and Loading Rack Throughput Agreement (Tulsa
East), dated March 31,2010, by and among Holly Refining & Marketing-Tulsa, LLC, HEP Tulsa
LLC and Holly Energy Storage-Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 6, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
Amendment to First Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage and Loading Rack Throughput
Agreement (Tulsa East), dated June 11, 2010, by and between Holly Refining & Marketing-Tulsa
LLC, HEP Tulsa LLC and Holly Energy Storage-Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for its quarterly period
ended June 30, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
Assignment and Assumption Agreement (First Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage and
Loading Rack Throughput Agreement (Tulsa East)), effective January 1, 2011, between Holly
Refining & Marketing-Tulsa LLC and Holly Refining & Marketing Company LLC (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
-115-
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26+
10.27+
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31*
Second Amended and Restated Pipelines, Tankage, and Loading Rack Throughput Agreement,
dated August 31, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed September 1, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Indemnification Proceeds and Payments Allocation Agreement, dated December 1, 2009, by and
between HEP Tulsa LLC and Holly Refining & Marketing-Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed December 7, 2009, File No. 1-
03876).
Pipeline Systems Operating Agreement, dated February 8, 2010, by and among Navajo Refining
Company, L.L.C., Lea Refining Company, Woods Cross Refining Company, L.L.C., Holly
Refining & Marketing — Tulsa LLC. and Holly Energy Partners-Operating, L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Holly Energy Partners, L.P.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
February 9, 2010, File No. 1-32225).
First Amendment to Pipeline Systems Operating Agreement, dated March 31, 2010, by and among
Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C, Lea Refining Company, Woods Cross Refining Company,
L.L.C, Holly Refining & Marketing-Tulsa, LLC and Holly Energy Partners-Operating, L.P.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
April 6, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
Loading Rack Throughput Agreement (Lovington), dated March 31, 2010, by and between Navajo
Refining Company, L.L.C. and Holly Energy Storage-Lovington LLC (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 6, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
First Amended and Restated Lease and Access Agreement (East Tulsa), dated March 31, 2010, by
and among Holly Refining & Marketing-Tulsa, LLC, HEP Tulsa LLC and Holly Energy Storage-
Tulsa LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed April 6, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
LLC Interest Purchase Agreement, dated November 9, 2011, by and among HollyFrontier
Corporation, Frontier Refining LLC, Frontier El Dorado Refining LLC, Holly Energy Partners —
Operating, L.P. and Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
First Amended and Restated Tankage, Loading Rack and Crude Oil Receiving Throughput
Agreement (Cheyenne), dated November 9, 2011, by and between Frontier Refining LLC and
Cheyenne Logistics LLC.
First Amended and Restated Pipeline Delivery, Tankage and Loading Rack Throughput
Agreement (El Dorado), dated November 9, 2011, by and between Frontier El Dorado Refining
LLC and El Dorado Logistics LLC.
Sixth Amended and Restated Omnibus Agreement, dated November 9, 2011, by and among
HollyFrontier Corporation, Holly Energy Partners, L.P. and certain of their respective subsidiaries
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
November 10, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Lease and Access Agreement (Cheyenne), dated November 9, 2011, by and between Frontier
Refining LLC and Cheyenne Logistics LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Lease and Access Agreement (El Dorado), dated November 9, 2011, by and between Frontier El
Dorado Refining LLC and El Dorado Logistics LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Holly Corporation Stock Option Plan as adopted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Holly
Corporation on December 13, 1990 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(i) of Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended July 31, 1991, File No. 1-03876).
-116-
10.32*
10.33*
10.34*
10.35*
10.36*
10.37*
10.38*
10.39*
10.40*
10.41*
10.42*
10.43*
10.44*
10.45*
10.46*
Holly Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan as amended and restated on May 24,
2007 as approved at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Holly Corporation on May 24, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-03876).
Amendment No. 1 to the Holly Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated on May 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Registrant’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, File No. 1-03876).
Second Amendment to the Holly Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
May 18, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Holly Corporation – Supplemental Payment Agreement for 2001 Service as Director
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its
fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, File No. 1-03876).
Holly Corporation – Supplemental Payment Agreement for 2002 Service as Director
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its
fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, File No. 1-03876).
Holly Corporation – Supplemental Payment Agreement for 2003 Service as Director (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended January 31, 2003, File No. 1-03876).
Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, File
No. 1-03876).
First Amendment to Performance Share Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.16 of Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
File No. 1-03876).
Holly Corporation Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement Policy (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 1, 2011, File
No. 1-03876).
Holly Corporation Employee Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 20, 2008, File No. 1-
03876).
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. Employee Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 20, 2008,
File No. 1-03876).
Form of Executive Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, File
No. 1-03876).
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, File
No. 1-03876).
Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, File
No. 1-03876).
Form of Form of Performance Share Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009,
File No. 1-03876).
-117-
10.47*
Form of Executive Restricted Stock Agreement [time and performance based vesting]
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
10.48*
Executive Restricted Stock Agreement, dated March 12, 2010, by and between Holly Corporation
and Matthew P. Clifton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
10.49*
Executive Restricted Stock Agreement, dated March 12, 2010, by and between Holly Corporation
and David L. Lamp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
10.50*
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Agreement [time based vesting] (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010, File No. 1-03876).
10.51*
Waiver Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2011, by and between Holly Corporation and
Matthew P. Clifton thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Registrant’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
10.52*
10.53*
10.54*
10.55*
10.56*
10.57*
10.58*
10.59*
10.60*
10.61*
Waiver Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2011, by and between Holly Corporation and Bruce
R. Shaw (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into with directors and officers of Holly Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 13, 2006, File No. 1-03876).
Retention and Assumption Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2011, by and among Frontier Oil
Corporation, Holly Corporation and Michael C. Jennings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2011).
Retention and Assumption Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2011, by and among Frontier Oil
Corporation, Holly Corporation and Doug S. Aron (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2011).
HollyFrontier Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed July 8, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
Form of Frontier Oil Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan Stock Unit Agreement
with Double Trigger Vesting (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011, File No. 1-
03876).
Form of Frontier Oil Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock
Agreement with Double Trigger Vesting (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of
Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011,
File No. 1-03876).
Frontier Deferred Compensation Plan (previously named Wainoco Deferred Compensation Plan
dated October 29, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Frontier’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed March 17, 1995).
Frontier Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (previously named Wainoco Deferred
Compensation Plan for Directors dated May 1, 1994 and incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.20 to Frontier’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 17, 1995).
Form of Frontier Oil Corporation Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan Stock Unit/Restricted
Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Frontier’s Form S-8 filed April 27,
2006).
-118-
10.62*
10.63*
10.64*
10.65*
10.66*
10.67*
10.68*
10.69*
10.70*
10.71*
10.73*
10.74*
10.75*
10.76*
10.77*
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Frontier and each of its officers and
directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Frontier’s Annual Report Form 10-K
filed February 28, 2007).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and
between Frontier Oil Corporation and Michael C. Jennings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Amendment to Executive and Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated April 28, 2009,
between Frontier Oil Corporation and Michael C. Jennings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 01, 2009).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and
between Frontier Oil Corporation and Doug S. Aron (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and
between Frontier Oil Corporation and Gerald B. Faudel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.6 to Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and
between Frontier Oil Corporation and James M. Stump (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.15 to Frontier’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated April 28, 2009, between Frontier Oil
Corporation and Joshua Goodmanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Frontier’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 01, 2009).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated September 9, 2009, between Frontier
Oil Corporation and Kevin D. Burke (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Frontier’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 09, 2009).
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2010 by and between
Frontier Oil Corporation and Paige A. Kester (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Frontier’s Current Report on Form filed November 4, 2010).
Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and between Frontier Oil
Corporation and Michael C. Jennings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Frontier’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and between Frontier Oil
Corporation and Doug S. Aron (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Frontier’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and between Frontier Oil
Corporation and Gerald B. Faudel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Frontier’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of December 30, 2008 by and between Frontier Oil
Corporation and James M. Stump (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Frontier’s Form
8-K filed January 2, 2009).
Executive Severance Agreement, dated April 28, 2009, between Frontier Oil Corporation and
Joshua Goodmanson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Frontier’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed May 01, 2009).
Executive Severance Agreement, dated September 9, 2009, between Frontier Oil Corporation and
Kevin D. Burke (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Frontier’s Current Report on Form
8- K filed September 09, 2009).
-119-
10.78*
Executive Severance Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2010 by and between Frontier Oil
Corporation and Paige A. Kester (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Frontier’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2010).
10.79*+
Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between HollyFrontier Corporation and each of its
officers and directors.
10.80
10.81
10.82
10.83
10.84
10.85
10.86
Credit Agreement dated July 1, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation and certain of its
subsidiaries, as borrowers, and Union Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain lenders
from time to time party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-
K Current Report filed July 8, 2011, File No. 1-03876).
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 24, 2011 by and among HollyFrontier
Corporation and certain subsidiaries of HollyFrontier Corporation, as borrowers, Union Bank,
N.A., as administrative agent, and each of the financial institutions party thereto as lenders
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed August
30, 2011, File No. 001-03876).
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated July 1, 2011, among HollyFrontier Corporation and
certain of its subsidiaries in favor of Union Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Form 8-K Current Report filed July 8, 2011, File No. 1-
03876).
Frontier Products Offtake Agreement El Dorado Refinery, dated as of October 19, 1999 by and
between Frontier Oil and Refining Company and Equiva Trading Company (now Shell Oil
Products US, assignee of Equiva Trading Company) (“the Agreement”), and First Amendment to
the Agreement dated September 18, 2000, Second Amendment to the Agreement dated
September 21, 2000, Third Amendment to the Agreement dated December 19, 2000, Fourth
Amendment to the Agreement dated February 22, 2001, Fifth Amendment to the Agreement
dated August 14, 2001, Sixth Amendment to the Agreement dated November 5, 2001, Seventh
Amendment to the Agreement dated April 22, 2002, Eight Amendment to the Agreement dated
May 30, 2003, Ninth Amendment to the Agreement dated May 25, 2004, Tenth Amendment to
the Agreement dated May 3, 2005, Eleventh Amendment to the Agreement dated March 31,
2006, Twelfth Amendment to the Agreement dated May 11, 2006, Thirteenth Amendment to the
Agreement dated September 30, 2007, Fourteenth Amendment to the Agreement dated May 1,
2008 and Fifteenth Amendment to the Agreement dated May 28, 2008 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Frontier Oil and Refining Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
August 7, 2008).
Sixteenth Amendment dated November 1, 2009, to the Frontier Products Offtake Agreement El
Dorado Refinery, dated as of October 19, 1999 by and between Frontier Oil and Refining
Company and Equiva Trading Company (now Shell Oil Products US, assignee of Equiva Trading
Company) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Frontier Oil and Refining Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 25, 2010).
Master Crude Oil Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated November 1, 2010, among BNP Paribas
Energy Trading GP, BNP Paribas Energy Trading Canada Corp., Frontier Oil and Refining
Company and Frontier Oil Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Frontier Oil
and Refining Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 4, 2010).
Guaranty dated November 1, 2010 made by Frontier Oil Corporation in favor of BNP Paribas
Energy Trading GP and BNP Paribas Energy Trading Canada Corp (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Frontier Oil and Refining Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
November 4, 2010).
21.1+
Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23.1+
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
-120-
31.1+
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2+
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1+
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2+ Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101++ The following financial information from Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
+ Filed herewith.
++Furnished electronically herewith.
* Constitutes management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
-121-
HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
Name of Entity
Black Eagle, LLC
Eagle Consolidation LLC
Ethanol Management Company LLC
Frontier El Dorado Refining LLC
Frontier Pipeline LLC
Frontier Refining LLC
Frontier Refining & Marketing LLC
HEP Fin-Tex/Trust-River, L.P. (5)
HEP Logistics GP, L.L.C (5)
HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P.
HEP Mountain Home, L.L.C. (5)
HEP Navajo Southern, L.P. (5)
HEP Pipeline Assets, Limited Partnership (5)
HEP Pipeline GP, L.L.C. (5)
HEP Pipeline, L.L.C. (5)
HEP Refining GP, L.L.C. (5)
HEP Refining Assets, L.P. (5)
HEP Refining, L.L.C. (5)
HEP SLC, LLC (5)
HEP Tulsa LLC (5)
HEP Woods Cross, L.L.C. (5)
HFRM Reno Technology LLC
Holly Biofuels, LLC
Holly Energy Finance Corp. (5)
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (4)
Holly Energy Partners – Operating, L.P. (4), (5)
Holly Energy Storage – Lovington LLC
Holly Energy Storage – Tulsa LLC
Holly Logistics Limited LLC
Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C.
Holly Petroleum, Inc.
HollyFrontier Payroll Services, Inc.
Holly Realty, LLC
Holly Refining & Marketing – Tulsa LLC
HollyFrontier Refining & Marketing LLC
Holly Refining & Marketing Company – Woods Cross LLC
Holly Refining Communications, Inc.
Holly Transportation LLC
Holly UNEV Pipeline Company
Holly Western Asphalt Company
Hollymarks, LLC
HRM Realty, LLC
Lea Refining Company
Lovington-Artesia, L.L.C. (5)
N18HN Exchange, L.L.C.
Navajo Holdings, Inc.
Navajo Pipeline Co., L.P. (1)
Navajo Pipeline GP, L.L.C.
Navajo Pipeline LP, L.L.C.
Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C. (2)
Navajo Refining GP, L.L.C.
Navajo Western Asphalt Company
NK Asphalt Partners (3)
Roadrunner Pipeline, L.L.C. (5)
SLC Pipeline LLC (5)
UNEV Pipeline, LLC
Wainoco Resources, Inc.
Wainoco Oil and Gas Company
EXHIBIT 21.1
State of Incorporation
or Organization
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Texas
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Mexico
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
New Mexico
New Mexico
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
Delaware
(1) Navajo Pipeline Co., L.P. also does business as Navajo Pipeline Co.
(2) Navajo Refining Company, L.L.C. also does business as Navajo Refining Company.
(3) NK Asphalt Partners does business as NK Asphalt Company.
(4) Holly Energy Partners, L.P. and Holly Energy Partners – Operating, L.P. also do business as Holly Energy Partners.
(5) Represents a subsidiary of Holly Energy Partners, L.P. We have presented these entities in our list of subsidiaries as a result of our
reconsolidation of Holly Energy Partners, L.P. on March 1, 2008.
-122-
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-54612 and
Form S-3ASR No. 333-163417) pertaining to the HollyFrontier Corporation Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Plan and to the sale of common stock on behalf of a selling stockholder, and in the related Prospectuses of our
reports dated February 28, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of HollyFrontier Corporation
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of HollyFrontier Corporation included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Dallas, Texas
February 28, 2012
/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
-123-
I, Michael C. Jennings, certify that:
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 31.1
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HollyFrontier Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
February 28, 2012
/s/ Michael C. Jennings
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and
President
- 124 -
I, Douglas S. Aron, certify that:
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 31.2
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of HollyFrontier Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and
have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
February 28, 2012
/s/ Douglas S. Aron
Douglas S. Aron
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
- 125 -
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
EXHIBIT 32.1
In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael C. Jennings, Chief
Executive Officer of HollyFrontier Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
Date:
February 28, 2012
/s/ Michael C. Jennings
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and
President
- 126 -
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER OF HOLLYFRONTIER CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
EXHIBIT 32.2
In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas S. Aron, Chief Financial
Officer of HollyFrontier Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
Date:
February 28, 2012
/s/ Douglas S. Aron
Douglas S. Aron
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
- 127 -
Our mission is to be the premier U.S. petroleum refining, pipeline and terminal
company as measured by superior financial performance and sustainable,
profitable growth.
We seek to accomplish this by operating in a safe, reliable and environmentally responsible manner, efficiently operating
our existing assets, offering our customers superior products and services, and growing both organically and through
strategic acquisitions.
We strive to outperform our competition through the quality and development of our employees and assets. We endeavor
to maintain an inclusive and stimulating work environment that enables each employee to fully contribute to and participate
in our Company’s success.
HollyFrontier Corporation (NYSE: HFC) is among the largest independent petroleum refiners in the United States with operations
throughout the Mid-Continent, Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Regions. We produce and market gasoline, diesel, jet fuel,
asphalt, heavy products and specialty lubricant products. The Company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas and operates five
complex refineries with 443,000 barrels per stream day (BPSD) of crude oil processing capacity. The Company owns a 42% interest
in Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP) and a 75% interest in the UNEV pipeline.
our ValueS
HeALtH
& SAFety
We put health and safety first. We conduct our business with primary emphasis on the health and
safety of our employees, contractors and neighboring communities. We continuously strive to raise
the bar, guided by our health and safety performance standards.
environMentAL
SteWArdSHiP
We care about the environment. We are committed to minimizing environmental impacts by reducing
wastes, emissions and other releases. We understand that it is a privilege to conduct our business in the
communities where we operate.
corPorAte
citizenSHiP
We obey the law. We are committed to promoting sustainable social and economic benefits wherever
we operate.
HoneSty
& reSPect
We tell the truth and respect others. We uphold high standards of business ethics and integrity,
enforce strict principles of corporate governance and support transparency in all our operations. One
of our greatest assets is our reputation for behaving ethically in the interests of employees, shareholders,
customers, business partners and the communities in which we operate and serve.
continuouS
iMProveMent
We continually improve. Innovation and high performance are our way of life. Our culture creates
a fulfilling environment which enables employees to reach their potential. We believe in creating our
own destiny and that a constructive attitude toward change is essential.
HollyFrontier corporation 2011 Annual report
C o r p o r a T e i N f o r m a T i o N
c o rP o rAt e o F F i c e r S
S t o c k t r A n S F e r A g e n t A n d r e g i S t r A r
Matthew P. Clifton
Executive Chairman
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and President
Doug S. Aron
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
David L. Lamp
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
George J. Damiris
Senior Vice President, Supply and Marketing
Bruce R. Shaw
Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development
James M. Stump
Senior Vice President, Refining Operations
Denise C. McWatters
Vice President and General Counsel
Scott C. Surplus
Vice President and Controller
B oA r d oF d i r e c t o r S
Matthew P. Clifton
Chairman of the Board
Michael C. Jennings
Chief Executive Officer and President
Douglas Y. Bech
Buford P. Berry
Leldon E. Echols
R. Kevin Hardage
Robert J. Kostelnik
James H. Lee
Robert. G. McKenzie
Franklin Myers
Michael E. Rose
Tommy A. Valenta
c o r P o r At e o F F i c e
HollyFrontier Corporation
2828 North Harwood, Suite 1300
Dallas, TX 75201-1507
214-871-3555
www.hollyfrontier.com
A u d i t o r S
Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
1.800.937.5449
www.amstock.com
Correspondence or questions concerning share holdings,
transfers, lost certificates, dividends, or address or registration
changes should be directed to American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company.
S t o c k e xc H A n g e L i S t i n g
New York Stock Exchange
Ticker Symbol: HFC
A n n uA L M e e t i n g
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held
at 8:30 a.m. on May 16, 2012, at the Crescent Club,
200 Crescent Court, 17th floor, Dallas, Texas.
S e c F i L i n g S
A direct link to the filings of HollyFrontier Corporation
at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission website
is available on the HollyFrontier Corporation website at
www.hollyfrontier.com on the Investor Relations page.
S t o c k P e r F o r M A n c e
Set forth is a line graph comparing, for the period commencing January 1, 2007
and ending December 31, 2011, the annual percentage change in cumulative total
stockholder return on our common stock to the cumulative total stockholder return
of the S&P Composite 500 Stock Index and an industry peer group chosen by
the Company. The stock price performance depicted in the following graph is not
necessarily indicative of future price performance. The graph will not be deemed to
be incorporated by reference in any filing by the Company under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange of 1934, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates such graph by reference.
HollyFrontier
S&P 500 index
Peer group
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
HollyFrontier
S&P 500 index
Peer group
2006
100
100
100
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
100
105
132
36
66
46
53
84
37
86
97
54
103
99
54
(1) The amounts shown assume that the value of the investment in HollyFrontier and
each index was $100 on January 1, 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested.
(2) The Peer Group consists of Alon USA Energy, Inc., CVR Energy, Inc (included from
10/23/07), Delek US Holdings, Inc., Sunoco Inc., Tesoro Corporation, Valero Energy
Corporation and Western Refining, Inc. CVR Energy, Inc. became public in 2007.
A
S
t
r
o
n
g
e
r
F
u
t
u
r
e
H
o
l
l
y
F
r
o
n
t
i
e
r
2
0
1
1
A
n
n
u
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2828 North Harwood
Suite 1300
Dallas, Texas 75201-1507
A Stronger Future2011 AnnuAl RepoRt