Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
Annual Report 2013
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
Communities
Financial Highlights
REVENUES AND INCOME
(Dollars in Millions)
Total Revenues
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related
Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange
Offer and Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt (1)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
Net Income (Loss)
ASSETS, DEBT AND EQUITY
(Dollars in Millions)
Total Assets
Total Recourse Debt
Total Equity Deficit
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
(Shares in Thousands)
Assuming Dilution:
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Arizona
California
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Maryland
Minnesota
New Jersey
North Carolina
Ohio
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Texas
Virginia/DC
West Virginia
Total
Active
13
12
6
16
1
4
9
4
11
1
19
1
6
75
14
-
192
Proposed
9
25
3
21
2
14
9
6
34
11
13
2
3
27
13
3
195
Years Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
$
1,851.3
$
1,485.4
$
1,134.9
$
1,371.8
$
1,596.3
$
$
$
$
$
$
27.7
21.9
31.3
1,759.1
1,529.4
(432.8)
$
$
$
$
$
$
(55.0)
(101.2)
(66.2)
1,684.3
1,542.2
(485.3)
$
$
$
$
$
$
(194.1)
(291.6)
(286.1)
1,602.2
1,602.8
(496.6)
$
$
$
$
$
$
(184.6)
(295.3)
2.6
1,817.6
1,616.3
(337.9)
$
$
$
$
$
$
(379.1)
(672.0)
(716.7)
2,024.6
1,751.7
(348.9)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
162,329
126,350
100,444
79,683
$
0.22
$
(0.52)
$
(2.85)
$
0.03
$
(9.16)
78,238
(1) Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment
of Debt is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 5 of this Annual Report for a reconciliation to Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes, the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure.
This summary should be read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
To our shareholders and associates:
We are very pleased to report a year of solid profitability,
For all of fiscal 2013, we had net income of $31.3 million,
driven by revenue growth, gross margin improvement
or $0.22 per fully diluted common share, compared with
and operating efficiencies. Assisted by an 11.6% growth
a net loss of $66.2 million, or $0.52 per common share,
in community count and a 12.7% increase in average
for all of last year.
sales price, our total revenues increased 24.2% to $1.9
billion in fiscal 2013. The average sales price increase
During fiscal 2013, the dollar value of our net contracts,
was related to both the mix of product delivered in fiscal
including unconsolidated joint ventures, increased 14.6%
2013 and our ability to raise home prices in more than
to $2.2 billion compared with $1.9 billion during all of
80% of our communities during the year.
2012. Additionally our net contracts per average active
Overall during fiscal 2012 and 2013, our homebuilding
9.3% and 44.1% compared to 28.1 and 21.3 in fiscal 2012
selling community for fiscal 2013 increased to 30.7 up
gross margin percentage, before interest expense and land
and 2011, respectively.
charges included in cost of sales, steadily increased, as
we raised home prices and as we continued to deliver
In 2013, we returned to profitability through top line
more homes in newly acquired communities. For all of
growth, controlling expenses and increasing our gross
fiscal 2013, our gross margin percentage increased 230
margin. More importantly, we believe that we are well
basis points to 20.1% from 17.8% the prior year,
positioned for a successful 2014, as we enter the year
returning us to our historical normalized gross margin
with a higher backlog, gross margin and community
percentage range between 20% and 21%.
count. We are optimistic that the homebuilding industry’s
recovery will continue this year and that we should
Both total SG&A expenses and interest expenses as a
achieve greater levels of profitability and continued
percentage of total revenues declined, as our top line
leveraging of our fixed costs in fiscal 2014, excluding
grew in fiscal 2013. Our total SG&A as a percentage of
any expenses related to early retirement of debt.
total revenues fell to 11.9% for 2013 compared with
12.8% in fiscal 2012. We continued to leverage the fixed
Taking a step back and
looking at
the overall
component of our SG&A expenses throughout the year
homebuilding industry, we saw continued improvement
and are approaching a normalized ratio of 10%. For all of
throughout fiscal 2013. The improvements that the
fiscal 2013, total interest expense as a percentage of total
industry experienced with respect to total housing starts is
revenues decreased 250 basis points to 7.8% compared
a direct reflection of
the continued United States
with 10.3% in the prior year.
economic recovery and increasing demand for new
The pretax income from our financial services operations
the high levels of home price appreciation that the
increased 23.8% in fiscal 2013 to $18.7 million from
industry experienced in many markets during 2013,
$15.1 million during fiscal 2012. Additionally, pretax
particularly in the first half of the year.
homes. The most unexpected market improvement was
income from our unconsolidated joint ventures more than
doubled to $12.0 million from $5.4 million in the prior
As we look forward,
we continue to believe that
year.
household formations, the primary driver of housing
demand, will ultimately lead to even further increases in
1 demand for new homes and we continue to believe that
maturities to 2016. Throughout the year, we increased our
our industry is still in the early stages of a housing
use of non-recourse property specific loans by $24.6
recovery.
million. All of these steps provided us with additional
liquidity to capitalize on new land opportunities and grow
During the year we also made strides to improve our
our business even further in the future.
inventory turnover, which allows us to grow our
Company by more efficiently utilizing our capital. We
On
that front, we remain extremely focused on
increased our inventory turnover to 1.7 times during
controlling new land. Since January 2009 through fiscal
fiscal 2013 compared with 1.4 for fiscal 2012. We believe
2013, we have controlled approximately 33,900 lots in
that we can make further progress in increasing our
542 communities, which includes 12,000 lots controlled
inventory turnover rate and reach our historical turnover
during fiscal 2013. At the end of fiscal 2013, there are
rates in excess of 2.0 times.
still about 22,500 of
these newly-controlled
lots
remaining at attractive land values for future home
Even after spending $503.0 million on land and land
deliveries. We continue
to seek
land acquisition
development in fiscal 2013, we ended the year with
opportunities that make solid economic returns and
$373.5 million of liquidity, which is significantly higher
provide opportunities to grow the top line in each of our
than the $289.0 million of liquidity we had at the end of
markets.
fiscal 2012. The liquidity position as of October 31, 2013
includes $319.1 million of homebuilding cash, $5.2
It would be an understatement to say that the past six
million of restricted cash used to collateralize letters of
years have been the most challenging years that our
credit and $49.2 million of availability under our
Company has faced since we started building homes in
unsecured revolving credit facility.
1959. However, our long term strategies of maintaining
geographic diversity and building a broad array of
At numerous times throughout fiscal 2013, we took steps
products have once again soundly positioned us to
to further bolster our capital position. During the first
participate and prosper in the housing recovery.
month of fiscal 2013, we continued our successful
partnership with GSO Capital Partners LP, the credit arm
All in all, we are delighted with our progress in fiscal
of The Blackstone Group, by announcing a $125 million
2013, which would not have been possible without the
increase of our land banking arrangement. In November
commitment of our associates. Finally, we continue to
2013, we further increased this land banking arrangement
look to our associates and stakeholders for support as we
by an additional $150 million, bringing the total since
build an even stronger future for our company.
July 2012 to $400 million.
In June 2013, we entered into a five-year $75 million
unsecured revolving credit facility with Citibank N.A. as
lender. In September 2013 we completed a small tack on
bond offering to our senior notes due 2016, the proceeds
of which were used to fund the redemption of $39.7
million of our earliest maturities thereby pushing out the
Ara K. Hovnanian
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
2 Communities Under Development
(Dollars In Thousands Except Average Price)
Net Contracts(1)
Deliveries
Contract Backlog
Twelve Months Ended October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012 % Change
2013
2012 % Change
2013
2012 % Change
(Unaudited)
Northeast
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
Mid-Atlantic
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
Midwest
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
Southeast
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
Southwest
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
West
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
Consolidated Total
573
$269,284
$469,955
628
$310,718
$494,774
835
$217,759
$260,789
608
$182,225
$299,712
2,502
$739,784
$295,677
398
$194,678
$489,142
463
$225,168
$486,324
590
$250,350
$424,322
678
$157,385
$232,132
593
$145,963
$246,143
2,178
$590,208
$270,986
635
$228,624
$360,038
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
5,544
$1,914,448
$345,319
5,137
$1,597,698
$311,018
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
Total
Home
Dollars
Avg. Price
633
$282,205
$445,822
701
$318,409
$454,221
6,177
$2,196,653
$355,618
5,838
$1,916,107
$328,213
DELIVERIES INCLUDE EXTRAS
23.8%
19.6%
(3.4)%
6.4%
24.1%
16.6%
23.2%
38.4%
12.3%
2.5%
24.8%
21.8%
14.9%
25.3%
9.1%
(37.3)%
(14.8)%
35.9%
7.9%
19.8%
11.0%
(9.7)%
(11.4)%
(1.8)%
5.8%
14.6%
8.3%
617
$279,695
$453,314
623
$288,323
$462,798
657
$162,758
$247,730
535
$146,264
$273,391
2,331
$684,258
$293,547
503
$223,029
$443,398
505
$218,396
$432,467
649
$268,880
$414,299
477
$106,539
$223,352
482
$113,347
$235,160
2,003
$515,757
$257,492
560
$182,661
$326,180
5,266
$1,784,327
$338,839
4,676
$1,405,580
$300,595
664
$306,174
$461,105
680
$320,657
$471,554
5,930
$2,090,501
$352,530
5,356
$1,726,237
$322,300
22.2%
28.1%
4.8%
(4.0)%
7.2%
11.7%
37.7%
52.8%
10.9%
11.0%
29.0%
16.3%
16.4%
32.7%
14.0%
(10.2)%
22.1%
35.9%
12.6%
26.9%
12.7%
(2.4)%
(4.5)%
(2.2)%
10.7%
21.1%
9.4%
220
$105,006
$477,299
271
$141,168
$520,916
605
$150,716
$249,118
308
$98,656
$320,312
677
$216,367
$319,597
86
$50,526
$587,516
2,167
$762,439
$351,841
225
$85,936
$381,938
2,392
$848,375
$354,672
264
$115,416
$437,182
266
$118,773
$446,515
427
$95,716
$224,159
235
$62,696
$266,791
506
$160,840
$317,866
191
$78,877
$412,969
1,889
$632,318
$334,737
256
$109,905
$429,316
2,145
$742,223
$346,025
(16.7)%
(9.0)%
9.2%
1.9%
18.9%
16.7%
41.7%
57.5%
11.1%
31.1%
57.4%
20.1%
33.8%
34.5%
0.5%
(55.0)%
(35.9)%
42.3%
14.7%
20.6%
5.1%
(12.1)%
(21.8)%
(11.0)%
11.5%
14.3%
2.5%
Note:
(1) Net contracts are defined as new contracts signed during the period for the purchase of homes, less cancellations of prior contracts.
Note: All statements in this Annual Report that are not historical facts should be considered as "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "Safe Harbor"
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in, or suggested by, such forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we can give no assurance that such plans, intentions, or expectations will be achieved. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited
to, (1) changes in general and local economic, industry and business conditions and impacts of the sustained homebuilding downturn, (2) adverse weather and other
environmental conditions and natural disasters, (3) changes in market conditions and seasonality of the Company’s business, (4) changes in home prices and sales activity
in the markets where the Company builds homes, (5) government regulation, including regulations concerning development of land, the home building, sales and
customer financing processes, tax laws, and the environment, (6) fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of mortgage financing, (7) shortages in, and price
fluctuations of, raw materials and labor, (8) the availability and cost of suitable land and improved lots, (9) levels of competition, (10) availability of financing to the
Company, (11) utility shortages and outages or rate fluctuations, (12) levels of indebtedness and restrictions on the Company’s operations and activities imposed by the
agreements governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness, (13) the Company's sources of liquidity, (14) changes in credit ratings, (15) availability of net operating
loss carryforwards, (16) operations through joint ventures with third parties, (17) product liability litigation, warranty claims and claims by mortgage investors, (18)
successful identification and integration of acquisitions, (19) significant influence of the Company’s controlling stockholders, (20) changes in tax laws affecting the after-
tax costs of owning a home, (21) geopolitical risks, terrorist acts and other acts of war, and (22) other factors described in detail in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013. Except as otherwise required by applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason.
3 Five-Year Financial Review
(In Thousands Except Number of Homes and Per-Share Data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Total Revenues
Inventory Impairment Loss and Land Option Write-Offs
Income (Loss) from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges,
Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on
Extinguishment of Debt (1)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
Net Income (Loss)
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share:
Diluted
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and Restricted Cash
Total Inventories
Total Assets
Total Recourse Debt
Total Non-Recourse Debt
Total Equity Deficit
Supplemental Financial Data:
Adjusted EBIT (2)
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
Interest Incurred
Adjusted EBITDA/Interest Incurred
Financial Statistics:
Average Net Debt/Capitalization (3)
Homebuilding Inventory Turnover (4)
Homebuilding Gross Margin (5)
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (6)
Operating Statistics:
Net Sales Contracts – Homes
Net Sales Contracts – Dollars
Deliveries – Homes
Deliveries – Dollars
Backlog – Homes
Backlog – Dollars
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Years Ended October 31,
$
$
$
1,851,253
4,965
12,040
$
$
$
1,485,353
12,530
5,401
$
$
$
1,134,907
101,749
(8,958)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
27,660
21,935
31,295
0.22
162,329
361,047
1,078,764
1,759,130
1,529,445
80,636
(432,799)
171,234
179,605
9,268
132,611
1.35x
158.0%
1.7x
20.1%
9.7%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(54,958)
(101,248)
(66,197)
(0.52)
126,350
337,434
981,466
1,684,250
1,542,196
57,077
(485,345)
97,475
107,411
(66,998)
147,048
0.73x
156.9%
1.4x
17.8%
7.2%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(194,078)
(291,588)
(286,087)
(2.85)
100,444
328,358
968,112
1,602,180
1,602,770
45,869
(496,602)
(25,522)
(12,204)
(207,415)
156,998
N/A
143.4%
1.1x
15.6%
N/A
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,371,842
135,699
956
(184,630)
(295,282)
2,588
0.03
79,683
480,185
1,001,940
1,817,560
1,616,347
24,970
(337,938)
(2,271)
13,615
32,487
154,307
0.09x
121.7%
1.3x
16.8%
1.0%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,596,290
659,475
(46,041)
(379,118)
(672,019)
(716,712)
(9.16)
78,238
584,020
1,109,913
2,024,577
1,751,701
21,507
(348,868)
(222,260)
(197,757)
(29,728)
194,702
N/A
98.5%
1.1x
9.2%
N/A
5,544
1,914,448
5,266
1,784,327
2,167
762,439
$
$
$
5,137
1,597,698
4,676
1,405,580
1,889
632,318
$
$
$
4,023
1,129,785
3,832
1,072,474
1,387
440,200
$
$
$
4,206
1,117,792
4,729
1,327,499
1,249
370,779
$
$
$
5,227
1,428,307
5,362
1,522,469
1,772
559,553
$
$
$
(1) Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt is not a financial measure
calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes. The reconciliation
of Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt to Income (Loss) Before
Income Taxes is presented on page 5 of this Annual Report. Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss
(Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes, Net Income (Loss) and other measures of financial
performance prepared in accordance with GAAP that are presented on the financial statements included in the Company's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Additionally, the Company's calculation of Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on
Extinguishment of Debt may be different than the calculation used by other companies, and, therefore, comparability may be affected.
(2) Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is Net Income (Loss). The reconciliation of Adjusted EBIT and
Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income (Loss) is presented on page 5 of this Annual Report. Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, Income
(Loss) Before Income Taxes, Net Income (Loss), Cash Flow Provided by (Used In) Operating Activities and other measures of financial performance and liquidity prepared in accordance with
GAAP that are presented on the financial statements included in the Company's reports filed with the SEC. Additionally, the Company's calculation of Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA may
be different than the calculation used by other companies, and, therefore, comparability may be affected.
(3) Debt excludes mortgage warehouse debt and non-recourse debt and is net of homebuilding cash balances. Capitalization includes debt, as previously defined, and total equity deficit. Calculated
based on a five quarter average.
(4) Derived by dividing total cost of sales, excluding cost of sales interest, by the five quarter average homebuilding inventory, excluding inventory not owned and capitalized interest.
(5) Excludes cost of sales interest.
(6) Adjusted EBITDA Margin is derived by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by Total Revenues.
This summary should be read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
4 Reconciliation of Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges, Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on
Extinguishment of Debt to Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes:
(Dollars In Thousands)
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
Inventory Impairment Loss and Land Option Write-Offs
Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Investment Write-Downs
Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes Excluding Land-Related Charges,
Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer and Loss (Gain) on
Extinguishment of Debt
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBIT and Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income (Loss):
(Dollars In Thousands)
Net Income (Loss)
Income Tax (Benefit) Provision
Interest Expense
EBIT
Inventory Impairment Loss and Land Option Write-offs
Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer
Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt
Adjusted EBIT
EBIT
Depreciation
Amortization of Debt Costs
EBITDA
Inventory Impairment Loss and Land Option Write-offs
Expenses Associated with the Debt Exchange Offer
Loss (Gain) on Extinguishment of Debt
Adjusted EBITDA
Years Ended October 31,
$
2013
21,935
4,965
–
–
760
$
2012
(101,248)
12,530
4,694
–
29,066
$
2011
(291,588)
101,749
–
3,289
(7,528)
$
2010
(295,282)
135,699
–
–
(25,047)
$
2009
(672,019)
659,475
–
43,611
(410,185)
$
27,660
$
(54,958)
$
(194,078)
$
(184,630)
$
(379,118)
Years Ended October 31,
2013
31,295
(9,360)
143,574
165,509
4,965
–
760
171,234
165,509
4,712
3,659
173,880
4,965
–
760
179,605
$
$
$
$
2012
(66,197)
(35,051)
152,433
51,185
12,530
4,694
29,066
97,475
51,185
6,223
3,713
61,121
12,530
4,694
29,066
107,411
$
$
$
$
2011
(286,087)
(5,501)
171,845
(119,743)
101,749
–
(7,528)
(25,522)
(119,743)
9,340
3,978
(106,425)
101,749
–
(7,528)
(12,204)
$
$
$
$
2010
2,588
(297,870)
182,359
(112,923)
135,699
–
(25,047)
(2,271)
(112,923)
12,576
3,310
(97,037)
135,699
–
(25,047)
13,615
$
$
$
$
2009
(716,712)
44,693
200,469
(471,550)
659,475
–
(410,185)
(222,260)
(471,550)
18,527
5,976
(447,047)
659,475
–
(410,185)
(197,757)
$
$
$
$
5 (This page has been left blank intentionally.)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended OCTOBER 31, 2013
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 1-8551
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
110 West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, N.J.
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
22-1851059
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
07701
(Zip Code)
732-747-7800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
7.25% Tangible Equity Units
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
Depositary Shares, each representing 1/1,000th of a share of 7.625%
Series A Preferred Stock
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
NASDAQ Global Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate “website”, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer ☐
Accelerated Filer ☒
Nonaccelerated Filer ☐
Smaller Reporting Company ☐
(Do Not Check if a smaller reporting Company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which
the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity as of April 30, 2013 (the last business day of the
registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $614,817,623.
As of the close of business on December 16, 2013, there were outstanding 124,546,460 shares of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock
and 14,654,867 shares of its Class B Common Stock.
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Part III — Those portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in
connection with registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held on March 11, 2014, which are responsive to those
parts of Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 as identified herein.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
1
1A
1B
2
3
4
PART I ...........................................................................................................................................................
Page
1
1
Business .................................................................................................................................................................
Risk Factors ...........................................................................................................................................................
9
Unresolved Staff Comments.................................................................................................................................. 18
Properties ............................................................................................................................................................... 18
Legal Proceedings ................................................................................................................................................. 18
Mine Safety Disclosures ........................................................................................................................................ 19
Executive Officers of the Registrant ..................................................................................................................... 19
PART II ......................................................................................................................................................... 20
5
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
6
7
7A
8
9
9A
9B
10
11
12
13
14
15
Securities ............................................................................................................................................................ 20
Selected Financial Data ......................................................................................................................................... 21
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ................................ 22
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ............................................................................... 53
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ..................................................................................................... 53
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ................................ 53
Controls and Procedures ........................................................................................................................................ 53
Other Information .................................................................................................................................................. 56
PART III ........................................................................................................................................................ 56
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance .................................................................................... 56
Executive Compensation ....................................................................................................................................... 57
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters .............. 57
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence ...................................................... 57
Principal Accountant Fees and Services ................................................................................................................ 57
PART IV ........................................................................................................................................................ 58
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ......................................................................................................... 58
Signatures .............................................................................................................................................................. 63
i
This page intentionally left blank
Part I
ITEM 1
BUSINESS
Business Overview
We design, construct, market, and sell single-family detached homes, attached
townhomes and
condominiums, urban infill, and active adult homes in planned residential developments and are one of the nation’s largest
builders of residential homes. Founded in 1959 by Kevork Hovnanian, Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”,
“us” or “our”) was incorporated in New Jersey in 1967 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1983. Since the incorporation of
our predecessor company and including unconsolidated joint ventures, we have delivered in excess of 306,000 homes,
including 5,930 homes in fiscal 2013. The Company consists of two distinct operations: homebuilding and financial
services. Our homebuilding operations consist of six segments: Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest,
and West. Our financial services operations provide mortgage loans and title services to the customers of our homebuilding
operations.
We are currently, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, offering homes for sale in 192 communities in 34
markets in 16 states throughout the United States. We market and build homes for first-time buyers, first-time and second-
time move-up buyers, luxury buyers, active adult buyers, and empty nesters. We offer a variety of home styles at base
prices ranging from $68,652 (low-income housing) to $1,524,990 with an average sales price, including options, of
$339,000 nationwide in fiscal 2013.
Our operations span all significant aspects of the home-buying process – from design, construction, and sale, to
mortgage origination and title services.
The following is a summary of our growth history:
1959 - Founded by Kevork Hovnanian as a New Jersey homebuilder.
1983 - Completed initial public offering.
1986 - Entered the North Carolina market through the investment in New Fortis Homes.
1992 - Entered the greater Washington, D.C. market.
1994 - Entered the Coastal Southern California market.
1998 - Expanded in the greater Washington, D.C. market through the acquisition of P.C. Homes.
1999 - Entered the Dallas, Texas market through our acquisition of Goodman Homes. Further diversified and
strengthened our position as New Jersey’s largest homebuilder through the acquisition of Matzel & Mumford.
2001 - Continued expansion in the greater Washington D.C. and North Carolina markets through the acquisition of
Washington Homes. This acquisition further strengthened our operations in each of these markets.
2002 - Entered the Central Valley market in Northern California and Inland Empire region of Southern California
through the acquisition of Forecast Homes.
2003 - Expanded operations in Texas and entered the Houston market through the acquisition of Parkside Homes
and Brighton Homes. Entered the greater Ohio market through our acquisition of Summit Homes and entered the
greater metro Phoenix market through our acquisition of Great Western Homes.
2004 - Entered the greater Tampa, Florida market through the acquisition of Windward Homes and started
operations in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota market.
2005 - Entered the Orlando, Florida market through our acquisition of Cambridge Homes and entered the greater
Chicago, Illinois market and expanded our position in Florida and Minnesota through the acquisition of the
1
operations of Town & Country Homes, which occurred concurrently with our entering into a joint venture with
affiliates of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors to own and develop Town & Country Homes’ existing residential
communities. We also entered the Fort Myers market through the acquisition of First Home Builders of Florida,
and the Cleveland, Ohio market through the acquisition of Oster Homes.
2006 - Entered the coastal markets of South Carolina and Georgia through the acquisition of Craftbuilt Homes.
Geographic Breakdown of Markets by Segment
Hovnanian markets and builds homes that are constructed in 21 of the nation’s top 50 housing markets. We
segregate our homebuilding operations geographically into the following six segments:
Northeast: New Jersey and Pennsylvania
Mid-Atlantic: Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and West Virginia
Midwest: Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio
Southeast: Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina
Southwest: Arizona and Texas
West: California
For financial information about our segments, see Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Employees
We employed approximately 1,749 full-time employees (whom we refer to as associates) as of October 31, 2013.
Corporate Offices and Available Information
Our corporate offices are located at 110 West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, New Jersey 07701, our
telephone number is 732-747-7800, and our Internet web site address is www.khov.com. Information available on or
through our web site is not a part of this Form 10-K. We make available through our web site our Annual Report on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(d) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with, or
furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of the Company’s Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports are available free of charge upon request. Any
materials we file with the SEC may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C., 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC
at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy, and information
statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Business Strategies
Although new home demand remains at historically low levels, during fiscal 2013 the overall homebuilding
market improved. Improved conditions in our markets resulted in our higher revenues and gross margins, increased
contracts and deliveries and profitability for the first time since fiscal 2006. From 2006 to 2012, the homebuilding industry
had been in a prolonged downturn. During that time, our primary focus, while market conditions were extremely weak, had
been to strengthen our financial condition by reducing inventories of homes and land, controlling and reducing construction
and overhead costs, maximizing cash flows, reducing outstanding debt, and maintaining strong liquidity. In 2009, we began
to see opportunities to purchase land at prices and terms that made economic sense in light of our sales prices and sales
paces. As a result, since early 2009, we have been more active in purchasing or putting under option new properties that
meet or exceed our internal rate of return investment requirements. Deliveries from these newly acquired communities
helped us achieve profitability in fiscal 2013, and in order to continue to increase profitability in the future, we will need to
continue purchasing new land that will generate good investment returns and drive greater operating efficiencies, as well as
control expenses commensurate with our level of deliveries.
2
In addition to our current focus on maintaining strong liquidity and evaluating new investment opportunities, we
intend to continue to focus on our historic key business strategies as enumerated below. We believe that these strategies
separate us from our competitors in the residential homebuilding industry and the adoption, implementation, and adherence
to these principles will continue to benefit our business.
Our goal is to become a significant builder in each of the selected markets in which we operate, which will enable
us to achieve powers and economies of scale and differentiate ourselves from most of our competitors.
We offer a broad product array to provide housing to a wide range of customers. Our customers consist of first-
time buyers, first-time and second-time move-up buyers, luxury buyers, active adult buyers, and empty nesters. Our diverse
product array includes single-family detached homes, attached townhomes and condominiums, urban infill, and active adult
homes.
We are committed to customer satisfaction and quality in the homes that we build. We recognize that our future
success rests in the ability to deliver quality homes to satisfied customers. We seek to expand our commitment to customer
service through a variety of quality initiatives. In addition, our focus remains on attracting and developing quality
associates. We use several leadership development and mentoring programs to identify key individuals and prepare them
for positions of greater responsibility within our Company.
We focus on achieving high return on invested capital. Each new community is evaluated based on its ability to
meet or exceed internal rate of return requirements. Our belief is that the best way to create lasting value for our
shareholders is through a strong focus on return on invested capital.
We prefer to use a risk-averse land strategy. We attempt to acquire land with a minimum cash investment and
negotiate takedown options, thereby limiting the financial exposure to the amounts invested in property and
predevelopment costs. This approach significantly reduces our risk and generally allows us to obtain necessary
development approvals before acquisition of the land.
We enter into homebuilding and land development joint ventures from time to time as a means of controlling lot
positions, expanding our market opportunities, establishing strategic alliances, reducing our risk profile, leveraging our
capital base, and enhancing our returns on capital. Our homebuilding joint ventures are generally entered into with third-
party investors to develop land and construct homes that are sold directly to home buyers. Our land development joint
ventures include those with developers and other homebuilders, as well as financial investors to develop finished lots for
sale to the joint venture’s members or other third parties.
We manage our financial services operations to better serve all of our home buyers. Our current mortgage
financing and title service operations enhance our contact with customers and allow us to coordinate the home-buying
experience from beginning to end.
3
Operating Policies and Procedures
We attempt to reduce the effect of certain risks inherent in the housing industry through the following policies and
procedures:
Training - Our training is designed to provide our associates with the knowledge, attitudes, skills, and habits
necessary to succeed in their jobs. Our training department regularly conducts online or webinar training in sales,
construction, administration, and managerial skills.
Land Acquisition, Planning, and Development - Before entering into a contract to acquire land, we complete
extensive comparative studies and analyses which assist us in evaluating the economic feasibility of such land acquisition.
We generally follow a policy of acquiring options to purchase land for future community developments.
● Where possible, we acquire land for future development through the use of land options, which need not be
exercised before the completion of the regulatory approval process. We attempt to structure these options with
flexible takedown schedules rather than with an obligation to take down the entire parcel upon receiving
regulatory approval. If we are unable to negotiate flexible takedown schedules, we will buy parcels in a single
bulk purchase. Additionally, we purchase improved lots in certain markets by acquiring a small number of
improved lots with an option on additional lots. This allows us to minimize the economic costs and risks of
carrying a large land inventory, while maintaining our ability to commence new developments during
favorable market periods.
● Our option and purchase agreements are typically subject to numerous conditions, including, but not limited
to, our ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals for the proposed community. Generally, the deposit
on the agreement will be returned to us if all approvals are not obtained, although predevelopment costs may
not be recoverable. By paying an additional nonrefundable deposit, we have the right to extend a significant
number of our options for varying periods of time. In most instances, we have the right to cancel any of our
land option agreements by forfeiture of our deposit on the agreement. In fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, rather
than purchase additional lots in underperforming communities, we took advantage of this right and walked
away from 1,611 lots, 2,134 lots, and 6,983 lots, respectively, out of 17,134 total lots, 13,552 total lots, and
16,896 total lots, respectively, under option, resulting in pretax charges of $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and
$24.3 million, respectively.
Design - Our residential communities are generally located in suburban areas easily accessible through public and
personal transportation. Our communities are designed as neighborhoods that fit existing land characteristics. We strive to
create diversity within the overall planned community by offering a mix of homes with differing architecture, textures, and
colors. Recreational amenities, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, clubhouses, open areas, and tot lots, are frequently
included.
Construction - We design and supervise the development and building of our communities. Our homes are
constructed according to standardized prototypes, which are designed and engineered to provide innovative product design
while attempting to minimize costs of construction. We generally employ subcontractors for the installation of site
improvements and construction of homes. Agreements with subcontractors are generally short term and provide for a fixed
price for labor and materials. We rigorously control costs through the use of computerized monitoring systems.
Because of the risks involved in speculative building, our general policy is to construct an attached condominium
or townhouse building only after signing contracts for the sale of at least 50% of the homes in that building. A majority of
our single family detached homes are constructed after the signing of a sales contract and mortgage approval has been
obtained. This limits the buildup of inventory of unsold homes and the costs of maintaining and carrying that inventory.
Materials and Subcontractors - We attempt to maintain efficient operations by utilizing standardized materials
available from a variety of sources. In addition, we generally contract with subcontractors to construct our homes. We have
reduced construction and administrative costs by consolidating the number of vendors serving certain markets and by
executing national purchasing contracts with select vendors. In recent years, we have experienced no significant
construction delays due to shortage of materials or labor; however, we cannot predict the extent to which shortages in
necessary materials or labor may occur in the future.
Marketing and Sales - Our residential communities are sold principally through on-site sales offices. In order to
respond to our customers’ needs and trends in housing design, we rely upon our internal market research group to analyze
4
information gathered from, among other sources, buyer profiles, and exit interviews at model sites, focus groups, and
demographic databases. We make use of newspaper, radio, television, Internet, magazine, our web site, billboard, video and
direct mail advertising, special and promotional events, illustrated brochures, and full-sized and scale model homes in our
comprehensive marketing program. In addition, we have home design galleries in our Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, North
Carolina, and Virginia markets, which offer a wide range of customer options to satisfy individual customer tastes.
Customer Service and Quality Control - In many of our markets, associates are responsible for customer service
and preclosing quality control inspections as well as responding to postclosing customer needs. Prior to closing, each home
is inspected and any necessary completion work is undertaken by us. Our homes are enrolled in a standard limited warranty
program which, in general, provides a homebuyer with a one-year warranty for the home’s materials and workmanship, a
two-year warranty for the home’s heating, cooling, ventilating, electrical, and plumbing systems, and a 10-year warranty
for major structural defects. All of the warranties contain standard exceptions, including, but not limited to, damage caused
by the customer.
Customer Financing - We sell our homes to customers who generally finance their purchases through mortgages.
Our financial services segment provides our customers with competitive financing and coordinates and expedites the loan
origination transaction through the steps of loan application, loan approval, and closing and title services. We originate
loans in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. We believe that our ability to offer financing to
customers on competitive terms as a part of the sales process is an important factor in completing sales.
During the year ended October 31, 2013, for the markets in which our mortgage subsidiaries originated loans,
14.6% of our home buyers paid in cash and 71.5% of our noncash home buyers obtained mortgages from our mortgage
banking subsidiary. The loans we originated in fiscal 2013 were 32.7% Federal Housing Administration/Veterans Affairs
(“FHA/VA”), 65.7% prime, and 1.6% United States Department of Agriculture.
We customarily sell virtually all of the loans and loan-servicing rights that we originate within a short period of
time. Loans are sold either individually or against forward commitments to institutional investors, including banks,
mortgage banking firms, and savings and loan associations.
Residential Development Activities
Our residential development activities include site planning and engineering, obtaining environmental and other
regulatory approvals and constructing roads, sewer, water, and drainage facilities, recreational facilities, and other
amenities and marketing and selling homes. These activities are performed by our associates, together with independent
architects, consultants, and contractors. Our associates also carry out long-term planning of communities. A residential
development generally includes single-family detached homes and/or a number of residential buildings containing from
two to 24 individual homes per building, together with amenities, such as club houses, swimming pools, tennis courts, tot
lots, and open areas.
Current base prices for our homes in contract backlog at October 31, 2013, range from $68,652 (low-income
housing) to $1,040,000 in the Northeast, from $159,900 to $1,524,990 in the Mid-Atlantic, from $99,490 to $701,808 in the
Midwest, from $173,490 to $566,252 in the Southeast, from $90,450 to $878,990 in the Southwest, and from $142,760 to
$1,130,000 in the West. Closings generally occur and are typically reflected in revenues within 12 months of when sales
contracts are signed.
Information on homes delivered by segment for the year ended October 31, 2013, is set forth below:
(Housing revenue in thousands)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Unconsolidated joint ventures
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures
Housing
Revenues
$279,695
288,323
162,758
146,264
684,258
223,029
$1,784,327
306,174
$2,090,501
Homes
Delivered
617
623
657
535
2,331
503
5,266
664
5,930
Average
Price
$453,314
462,798
247,730
273,391
293,547
443,398
$338,839
461,105
$352,530
5
The value of our net sales contracts, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, increased to $1.9 billion from $1.6
billion for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The number of homes contracted increased to 5,544 in
2013 from 5,137 in 2012. The increase in the number of homes contracted occurred along with an increase in the number of
open-for-sale communities from 172 to 192. We contracted an average of 30.7 homes per average active selling community
in 2013 compared to 28.1 homes per active selling community in 2012, demonstrating an increase in sales pace as the
homebuilding market has improved.
Information on the value of net sales contracts by segment for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, is set
forth below:
(Value of net sales contracts in thousands)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Unconsolidated joint ventures
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures
2013
$269,284
310,718
217,759
182,225
739,784
194,678
$1,914,448
282,205
$2,196,653
2012
$225,168
250,350
157,385
145,963
590,208
228,624
$1,597,698
318,409
$1,916,107
Percentage of
Change
19.6%
24.1%
38.4%
24.8%
25.3%
(14.8)%
19.8%
(11.4)%
14.6%
The following table summarizes our active selling communities under development as of October 31, 2013. The
contracted not delivered and remaining homes available in our active selling communities are included in the consolidated
total homesites under the total residential real estate chart in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.”
Active Selling Communities
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
Communities
12
29
27
24
88
12
192
Approved
Homes
3,181
4,393
4,092
2,229
11,484
2,371
27,750
Homes
Delivered
Contracted
Not
Delivered(1)
220
271
605
308
677
86
2,167
2,039
1,748
1,009
972
6,539
961
13,268
Remaining
Homes
Available(2)
922
2,374
2,478
949
4,268
1,324
12,315
(1) Includes 274 home sites under option.
(2) Of the total remaining homes available, 694 were under construction or completed (including 61 models and sales
offices), and 6,490 were under option.
Backlog
At October 31, 2013 and 2012, including unconsolidated joint ventures, we had a backlog of signed contracts for
2,392 homes and 2,145 homes, respectively, with sales values aggregating $848.4 million and $742.2 million, respectively.
The majority of our backlog at October 31, 2013, is expected to be completed and closed within the next 12 months. At
November 30, 2013 and 2012, our backlog of signed contracts, including unconsolidated joint ventures, was 2,464 homes
and 2,138 homes, respectively, with sales values aggregating $892.8 million and $745.8 million, respectively. For
information on our backlog excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, see the table on page 42 under Item 7 “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations -Homebuilding.”
Sales of our homes typically are made pursuant to a standard sales contract that provides the customer with a
statutorily mandated right of rescission for a period ranging up to 15 days after execution. This contract requires a nominal
customer deposit at the time of signing. In addition, in the Northeast, and some sections of the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest,
6
we typically obtain an additional 5% to 10% down payment due within 30 to 60 days after signing. The contract may
include a financing contingency, which permits customers to cancel their obligation in the event mortgage financing at
prevailing interest rates (including financing arranged or provided by us) is unobtainable within the period specified in the
contract. This contingency period typically is four to eight weeks following the date of execution of the contract. When
housing values decline in certain markets, some customers cancel their contracts and forfeit their deposits. Cancellation
rates are discussed further in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.” Sales contracts are included in backlog once the sales contract is signed by the customer, which in some cases
includes contracts that are in the rescission or cancellation periods. However, revenues from sales of homes are recognized
in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, when title to the home is conveyed to the buyer, adequate initial and
continuing investments have been received, and there is no continued involvement.
Residential Land Inventory in Planning
It is our objective to control a supply of land, primarily through options, whenever possible, consistent with
anticipated homebuilding requirements in each of our housing markets. Controlled land (land owned and under option) as
of October 31, 2013, exclusive of communities under development described above under “Active Selling Communities”
and excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, is summarized in the following table. The proposed developable home sites in
communities in planning are included in the 32,097 consolidated total home sites under the total residential real estate table
in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on page 35.
Communities in Planning
(Dollars in thousands)
Northeast:
Under option(1)
Owned
Total
Mid-Atlantic:
Under option(1)
Owned
Total
Midwest:
Under option(1)
Owned
Total
Southeast:
Under option(1)
Owned
Total
Southwest:
Under option(1)
Owned
Total
West:
Under option(1)
Owned
Total
Totals:
Under option(1)
Owned
Combined total
Number
of Proposed
Communities
Proposed
Developable
Home Sites
Total Land
Option
Price
Book
Value
22
14
36
13
15
28
22
11
33
22
15
37
31
5
36
-
25
25
2,486 $204,117
1,140
3,626
$11,720
108,120
$119,840
1,212 $135,258
1,741
2,953
$2,596
29,412
$32,008
$50,081
$92,020
1,241
468
1,709
2,010
568
2,578
1,746 $126,818
305
2,051
-
4,634
4,634
-
$2,722
6,078
$8,800
$5,381
5,484
$10,865
$11,538
14,899
$26,437
-
$27,202
$27,202
110
85
195
8,695 $608,294
8,856
17,551
$33,957
191,195
$225,152
(1) Properties under option also include costs incurred on properties not under option but which are under evaluation. For
properties under option, as of October 31, 2013, option fees and deposits aggregated approximately $25.8 million. As of
October 31, 2013, we spent an additional $15.2 million in nonrefundable predevelopment costs on such properties.
7
We either option or acquire improved or unimproved home sites from land developers or other sellers. Under a
typical agreement with the land developer, we purchase a minimal number of home sites. The balance of the home sites to
be purchased is covered under an option agreement or a nonrecourse purchase agreement. During the declining
homebuilding market, we decided to mothball (or stop development on) certain communities where we determined that
current market conditions did not justify further investment at that time. When we decide to mothball a community, the
inventory is reclassified on our Consolidated Balance Sheet from Sold and unsold homes and lots under development to
Land and land options held for future development or sale. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion on mothballed communities. For additional financial information regarding our homebuilding segments, see
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Raw Materials
The homebuilding industry has from time to time experienced raw material and labor shortages. In particular,
shortages and fluctuations in the price of lumber or in other important raw materials could result in delays in the start or
completion of or increase the cost of developing one or more of our residential communities. We attempt to maintain
efficient operations by utilizing standardized materials available from a variety of sources. In addition, we generally
contract with subcontractors to construct our homes. We have reduced construction and administrative costs by
consolidating the number of vendors serving certain markets and by executing national purchasing contracts with select
vendors.
Seasonality
Our business is seasonal in nature and, historically, weather-related problems, typically in the fall, late winter and
early spring, can delay starts or closings and increase costs.
Competition
Our homebuilding operations are highly competitive. We are among the top 10 homebuilders in the United States
in both homebuilding revenues and home deliveries. We compete with numerous real estate developers in each of the
geographic areas in which we operate. Our competition ranges from small local builders to larger regional builders to
publicly owned builders and developers, some of which have greater sales and financial resources than we do. Previously
owned homes and the availability of rental housing provide additional competition. We compete primarily on the basis of
reputation, price, location, design, quality, service, and amenities.
Regulation and Environmental Matters
We are subject to various local, state, and federal statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations concerning zoning,
building design, construction, and similar matters, including local regulations which impose restrictive zoning and density
requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular
locality. In addition, we are subject to registration and filing requirements in connection with the construction,
advertisement, and sale of our communities in certain states and localities in which we operate even if all necessary
government approvals have been obtained. We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from
developing communities due to building moratoriums that could be implemented in the future in the states in which we
operate. Generally, such moratoriums relate to insufficient water or sewerage facilities or inadequate road capacity.
In addition, some state and local governments in markets where we operate have approved, and others may
approve, slow-growth, or no-growth initiatives that could negatively affect the availability of land and building
opportunities within those areas. Approval of these initiatives could adversely affect our ability to build and sell homes in
the affected markets and/or could require the satisfaction of additional administrative and regulatory requirements, which
could result in slowing the progress or increasing the costs of our homebuilding operations in these markets. Any such
delays or costs could have a negative effect on our future revenues and earnings.
We are also subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of
health and the environment (“environmental laws”). The particular environmental laws which apply to any given
community vary greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions, and the present and former
uses of the site. These environmental laws may result in delays; may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation,
and/or other costs; and prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity. See Item 3 “Legal
Proceedings” and Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Despite our past ability to obtain necessary permits and approvals for our communities, we anticipate that
increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the future. Although we cannot
predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive compliance programs and in
substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In addition our ability to obtain or
renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or approvals already obtained is
dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in policies, rules, and regulations and
their interpretation and application.
ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risks in addition to the other information included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto.
The homebuilding industry is significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions, real estate
markets, and weather and other environmental conditions, which could affect our ability to build homes at prices our
customers are willing or able to pay, could reduce profits that may not be recaptured, could result in cancellation of sales
contracts, and could affect our liquidity.
The homebuilding industry is cyclical, has from time to time experienced significant difficulties, and is
significantly affected by changes in general and local economic conditions such as:
• Employment levels and job growth;
• Availability of financing for home buyers;
• Interest rates;
• Foreclosure rates;
• Inflation;
• Adverse changes in tax laws;
• Consumer confidence;
• Housing demand;
• Population growth; and
• Availability of water supply in locations in which we operate.
Turmoil in the financial markets could affect our liquidity. In addition, our cash balances are primarily invested in
short-term government-backed instruments. The remaining cash balances are held at numerous financial institutions and
may, at times, exceed insurable amounts. We seek to mitigate this risk by depositing our cash in major financial institutions
and diversifying our investments. In addition, our homebuilding operations often require us to obtain letters of credit. We
recently entered into a new $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility under which letters of credit may be issued. We
also have certain stand-alone letter of credit facilities and agreements pursuant to which letters of credit are issued.
However, we may need additional letters of credit above the amounts provided under these facilities and agreements. If we
are unable to obtain such additional letters of credit as needed to operate our business, we may be adversely affected.
Weather conditions and man-made or natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods,
droughts, fires, and other environmental conditions, can harm the local homebuilding business. For example, our business
in Florida was adversely affected in late 2005 and into 2006 due to the effects of Hurricane Wilma on materials and labor
availability and pricing. Conversely, Hurricane Ike, which hit Houston in September 2008, did not have an effect on
materials and labor availability or pricing, but did affect the volume of home sales in subsequent weeks. In August 2011
and October 2012, Hurricane Irene and Hurricane Sandy, respectively, caused widespread flooding and disruptions on the
Atlantic seaboard, which impacted our sales and construction activity in affected markets during those months.
9
The difficulties described above could cause us to take longer and incur more costs to build our homes. We may
not be able to recapture increased costs by raising prices in many cases because we fix our prices up to 12 months in
advance of delivery by signing home sales contracts. In addition, some home buyers may cancel or not honor their home
sales contracts altogether.
The homebuilding industry has experienced a significant and sustained downturn which has, and could continue to,
materially and adversely affect our business, liquidity, and results of operations.
The homebuilding industry experienced a significant and sustained downturn over the past several years. An
industry-wide softening of demand for new homes resulted from a lack of consumer confidence, decreased availability of
mortgage financing, and large supplies of resale and new home inventories, among other factors. In addition, an oversupply
of alternatives to new homes, such as rental properties, resale homes, and foreclosures, depressed prices, and reduced
margins for the sale of new homes. Industry conditions had a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations in fiscal years 2007 through 2011 and may continue to materially adversely affect our business and results of
operations in future years. Further, we substantially increased our inventory through fiscal 2006, which required significant
cash outlays and which increased our price and margin exposure as we worked through this inventory.
General economic conditions in the United States remain weak. Several challenges, such as persistently high
unemployment levels, national and global economic weakness and uncertainty, the restrictive mortgage lending
environment, and the potential for more foreclosures, continue to threaten the recovery in the housing market. In addition,
both national new home sales and our home sales remain below historical levels. Until there is a more robust U.S.
economic recovery, we expect national demand for new homes to remain at historically low levels, with uneven
improvement across our operating markets. Looking forward, although we have begun to see improvements, given
instability in the housing market, it may continue to be difficult to generate positive cash flow especially as we invest in
land to fund future homebuilding. In addition, while our sales have increased, we saw lower sales in July through
September 2013 in part due to increasing interest rates. Market volatility has been unprecedented and extraordinary in the
last several years, and the resulting economic turmoil may continue to exacerbate industry conditions or have other
unforeseen consequences, leading to uncertainty about future conditions in the homebuilding industry. Continuation or
worsening of the downturn or general economic conditions would continue to have a material adverse effect on our
business, liquidity, and results of operations.
In addition, an increase in the default rate on the mortgages we originate may adversely affect our ability to sell
mortgages or the pricing we receive upon the sale of mortgages. Although substantially all of the mortgage loans we
originate are sold in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis, we remain liable for
certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. As default rates rise, this may increase
our potential exposure regarding mortgage loan sales because investors may seek to have us buy back or make whole
investors for mortgages we previously sold. To date, we have not made significant payments related to our mortgage loans,
but because of the uncertainties inherent to these matters, actual future payments could differ significantly from our
currently estimated amounts.
During the industry downturn, the housing market benefited from a number of government programs, including:
• Tax credits for home buyers provided by the federal government and certain state governments, including
California; and
• Support of the mortgage market, including through purchases of mortgage-backed securities by The Federal
Reserve Bank and the underwriting of a substantial amount of new mortgages by the Federal Housing
Administration (“FHA”) and other governmental agencies.
These programs are expected to wind down over time; for example, the California tax credit ended in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009 and the federal tax credit expired in April 2010. In addition, in fiscal 2010, the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) tightened FHA underwriting standards. The maximum size of mortgage loans
that are treated as conforming by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was reduced on October 1, 2011, which could further
weaken home sales in general as mortgages may become more expensive and, if conforming loan limits are further reduced
(as currently expected to occur on January 1, 2014), it could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Housing
markets may further decline as these programs are modified or terminated.
10
Our leverage places burdens on our ability to comply with the terms of our indebtedness, may restrict our ability to
operate, may prevent us from fulfilling our obligations, and may adversely affect our financial condition.
We have a significant amount of debt.
• Our debt (excluding nonrecourse secured debt and debt of our financial subsidiaries), as of October 31, 2013,
including the debt of the subsidiaries that guarantee our debt, was $1,544.2 million ($1,529.4 million net
of discount); and
• Our debt service payments for the 12-month period ended October 31, 2013, were $121.2 million, substantially
all of which represented interest incurred and the remainder of which represented payments on the principal of
our amortizing notes, and do not include principal and interest on nonrecourse secured debt, debt of our
financial subsidiaries and fees under our letter of credit and other credit facilities and agreements.
In addition, as of October 31, 2013, we had $30.9 million in aggregate outstanding face amount of letters of credit
issued under various letter of credit and other credit facilities and agreements, certain of which were collateralized by $5.2
million of cash. Our fees for these letters of credit for the year ended October 31, 2013, which are based on both the used
and unused portion of the facilities and agreements, were $0.7 million. We also had substantial contractual commitments
and contingent obligations, including approximately $242.0 million of performance bonds as of October 31, 2013. See Item
7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Contractual Obligations.”
Our significant amount of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:
• Limit our ability to obtain future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service
requirements, or other requirements;
• Require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of our debt and
reduce our ability to use our cash flow for other purposes;
• Limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business;
• Place us at a competitive disadvantage because we have more debt than some of our competitors; and
• Make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business and general economic conditions.
Our ability to meet our debt service and other obligations will depend upon our future performance. We are
engaged in businesses that are substantially affected by changes in economic cycles. Our revenues and earnings vary with
the level of general economic activity in the markets we serve. Our businesses are also affected by customer sentiment and
financial, political, business, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. The factors that affect our ability to
generate cash can also affect our ability to raise additional funds for these purposes through the sale of equity securities, the
refinancing of debt, or the sale of assets. Changes in prevailing interest rates may affect our ability to meet our debt service
obligations to the extent we have any floating rate indebtedness. A higher interest rate on our debt service obligations could
result in lower earnings or increased losses.
Our sources of liquidity are limited and may not be sufficient to meet our needs.
We are largely dependent on our current cash balance and future cash flows from operations (which may not be
positive) to enable us to service our indebtedness, to cover our operating expenses, and/or to fund our other liquidity needs.
Although we generated $9.3 million of cash in operating activities in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, for the prior
two years we generated negative cash flow, and currently expect to continue to generate slightly positive or negative cash
flow, after taking into account land purchases. If the homebuilding industry does not experience improved conditions over
the next several years, our cash flows could be insufficient to fund our obligations and support land purchases; if we cannot
buy additional land we would ultimately be unable to generate future revenues from the sale of houses. In addition, we may
need to further refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity, which we may not be able to do on favorable
terms or at all. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations or we are unable
to refinance our indebtedness, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, sell assets, seek
additional capital, or restructure our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful or, if successful, made
on desirable terms and may not permit us to meet our debt service obligations. We have also entered into certain cash
collateralized letters of credit agreements and facilities that require us to maintain specified amounts of cash in segregated
11
accounts as collateral to support our letters of credit issued thereunder. If our available cash and capital resources are
insufficient to meet our debt service and other obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be
required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to
consummate those dispositions or the proceeds from the dispositions may not be adequate to meet any debt service
obligations then due. For additional information about capital resources and liquidity, see Item 7 “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Capital Resources and Liquidity.”
Restrictive covenants in our debt instruments may restrict our and certain of our subsidiaries’ ability to operate and if our
financial performance worsens, we may not be able to undertake transactions within the restrictions of our debt
instruments.
The indentures governing our outstanding debt securities and our revolving credit facility impose certain
restrictions on our and certain of our subsidiaries’ operations and activities. The most significant restrictions relate to debt
incurrence, creating liens, sales of assets, cash distributions, including paying dividends on common and preferred stock,
capital stock and debt repurchases, and investments by us and certain of our subsidiaries. Because of these restrictions, we
are currently prohibited from paying dividends on our common and preferred stock and anticipate that we will remain
prohibited for the foreseeable future.
The restrictions in our debt instruments could prohibit or restrict our and certain of our subsidiaries’ activities,
such as undertaking capital raising or restructuring activities or entering into other transactions. In such a situation, we may
be unable to amend the instrument or obtain a waiver. In addition, if we fail to make timely payments on this debt and other
material indebtedness, our debt under these debt instruments could become due and payable prior to maturity. In such a
situation, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain alternative financing. Either situation could have a
material adverse effect on the solvency of the Company.
The terms of our debt instruments allow us to incur additional indebtedness.
Under the terms of our indebtedness under our indentures and under our revolving credit facility, we have the
ability, subject to our debt covenants, to incur additional amounts of debt. The incurrence of additional indebtedness could
magnify the risks described above. In addition, certain obligations, such as standby letters of credit and performance bonds
issued in the ordinary course of business, including those issued under our stand-alone letter of credit agreements and
facilities, are not considered indebtedness under our debt instruments (and may be secured), and therefore, are not subject
to limits in our debt covenants.
We could be adversely affected by a negative change in our credit rating.
Our ability to access capital on favorable terms is a key factor in our ability to service our indebtedness to cover
our operating expenses and to fund our other liquidity needs. For example, during fiscal 2011 and thereafter, credit
agencies took a series of negative actions, including downgrades, with respect to their credit ratings of us and our debt.
Downgrades may make it more difficult and costly for us to access capital. Therefore, any further downgrade by any of the
principal credit agencies may exacerbate these difficulties. Although certain of our credit ratings have recently been
upgraded, there can be no assurances that our credit ratings will not be further downgraded in the future, whether as a result
of deteriorating general economic conditions, a more protracted downturn in the housing industry, failure to successfully
implement our operating strategy, the adverse impact on our results of operations or liquidity position of any of the above,
or otherwise.
Our business is seasonal in nature and our quarterly operating results can fluctuate.
Our quarterly operating results generally fluctuate by season. The construction of a customer’s home typically
begins after signing the agreement of sale and can take 12 months or more to complete. Weather-related problems, typically
in the fall, winter and early spring, can delay starts or closings and increase costs and thus reduce profitability. In addition,
delays in opening communities could have an adverse effect on our sales and revenues. Due to these factors, our quarterly
operating results will likely continue to fluctuate.
Our success depends on the availability of suitable undeveloped land and improved lots at acceptable prices and our
having sufficient liquidity to fund such investments.
Our success in developing land and in building and selling homes depends in part upon the continued availability
of suitable undeveloped land and improved lots at acceptable prices. The availability of undeveloped land and improved
12
lots for purchase at favorable prices depends on a number of factors outside of our control, including the risk of competitive
over bidding on land and lots and restrictive governmental regulation. Should suitable land opportunities become less
available, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell would be reduced, which would reduce revenue and
profits. In addition, our ability to make land purchases will depend upon us having sufficient liquidity to fund such
purchases. We may be at a disadvantage in competing for land due to our significant debt obligations, which require
substantial cash resources.
Raw material and labor shortages and price fluctuations could delay or increase the cost of home construction and
adversely affect our operating results.
The homebuilding industry has from time to time experienced raw material and labor shortages. In particular,
shortages and fluctuations in the price of lumber or in other important raw materials could result in delays in the start or
completion of, or increase the cost of, developing one or more of our residential communities. For example, manufacturers
have increased the price of drywall in 2013 by approximately 20% as compared to the prior year, and there is a potential for
significant future price increases. In addition, we contract with subcontractors to construct our homes. Therefore, the timing
and quality of our construction depends on the availability, skill, and cost of our subcontractors. Delays or cost increases
caused by shortages and price fluctuations could harm our operating results, the impact of which may be further affected
depending on our ability to raise sales prices to offset increased costs. We have experienced some labor shortages and
increased labor costs in recent months.
Changes in economic and market conditions could result in the sale of homes at a loss or holding land in inventory longer
than planned, the cost of which can be significant.
Land inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. We must continuously seek and make acquisitions of
land for expansion into new markets and for replacement and expansion of land inventory within our current markets. The
market value of undeveloped land, buildable lots, and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing
economic and market conditions. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, we may have to sell
homes at a loss or hold land in inventory longer than planned. In the case of land options, we could choose not to exercise
them, in which case we would write off the value of these options. Inventory carrying costs can be significant and can
result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. The assessment of communities for indication of impairment is
performed quarterly. While we consider available information to determine what we believe to be our best estimates as of
the reporting period, these estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change.
See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation - Critical Accounting
Policies.” For example, while in fiscal 2013 and 2012, we did not have significant land option write-offs or impairments,
during fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, we decided not to exercise many option contracts and walked away from land option
deposits and predevelopment costs, which resulted in land option write-offs of $24.3 million, $13.2 million, and $45.4
million, respectively. Also, in fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, as a result of the difficult market conditions, we recorded
inventory impairment losses on owned property of $77.5 million, $122.5 million, and $614.1 million, respectively. If
market conditions worsen, additional inventory impairment losses and land option write-offs will likely be necessary.
Home prices and sales activities in the Arizona, California, New Jersey, and Texas, markets have a large impact on our
results of operations because we conduct a significant portion of our business in these markets.
We presently conduct a significant portion of our business in the Arizona, California, New Jersey, and Texas,
markets. Home prices and sales activities in these markets and in most of the other markets in which we operate have
declined from time to time, particularly as a result of slow economic growth. Furthermore, precarious economic and budget
situations at the state government level may adversely affect the market for our homes in those affected areas. If home
prices and sales activity decline in one or more of the markets in which we operate, our costs may not decline at all or at the
same rate and may negatively impact our results of operations.
Because almost all of our customers require mortgage financing, increases in interest rates or the decreased availability of
mortgage financing could impair the affordability of our homes, lower demand for our products, limit our marketing
effectiveness, and limit our ability to fully realize our backlog.
Virtually all of our customers finance their acquisitions through lenders providing mortgage financing. Increases
in interest rates (or the perception that interest rates will rise, including as a result of government actions) or decreases in
availability of mortgage financing could lower demand for new homes because of the increased monthly mortgage costs to
potential home buyers. Even if potential customers do not need financing, changes in interest rates and mortgage
availability could make it harder for them to sell their existing homes to potential buyers who need financing. This could
13
prevent or limit our ability to attract new customers as well as our ability to fully realize our backlog because our sales
contracts generally include a financing contingency. Financing contingencies permit the customer to cancel its obligation in
the event mortgage financing at prevailing interest rates, including financing arranged or provided by us, is unobtainable
within the period specified in the contract. This contingency period is typically four to eight weeks following the date of
execution of the sales contract.
Starting in 2007, many lenders have been significantly tightening their underwriting standards, and subprime and
other alternative mortgage products are no longer being made available in the marketplace. If these trends continue and
mortgage loans continue to be difficult to obtain, the ability and willingness of prospective buyers to finance home
purchases or to sell their existing homes will be adversely affected, which will adversely affect our operating results. In
addition, we believe that the availability of mortgage financing, including Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corp, and FHA/VA financing, is an important factor in marketing many of our homes. The
maximum size of mortgage loans that are treated as conforming by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was reduced on October
1, 2011, which could further weaken home sales in general as mortgages may become more expensive and, if conforming
loan limits are further reduced (as currently expected to occur on January 1, 2014), it could have a material adverse effect
on the Company. In addition, HUD continues to tighten FHA underwriting standards. Any limitations or restrictions on the
availability of those types of financing could reduce our sales.
Increases in the after-tax costs of owning a home could prevent potential customers from buying our homes and adversely
affect our business or financial results.
Significant expenses of owning a home, including mortgage interest expenses and real estate taxes, generally are
deductible expenses for an individual’s federal, and in some cases state, income taxes, subject to limitations under current
tax law and policy. If the federal government or a state government were to change its income tax laws to eliminate or
substantially limit these income tax deductions, as has been discussed from time to time, the after-tax cost of owning a new
home would increase for many of our potential customers. The loss or reduction of these homeowner tax deductions, if
such tax law changes were enacted without any offsetting legislation, would adversely impact demand for and sales prices
of new homes, including ours. In addition, increases in property tax rates or fees on developers by local governmental
authorities, as experienced in response to reduced federal and state funding or to fund local initiatives, such as funding
schools or road improvements, can adversely affect the ability of potential customers to obtain financing or their desire to
purchase new homes, and can have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.
We conduct certain of our operations through unconsolidated joint ventures with independent third parties in which we do
not have a controlling interest. These investments involve risks and are highly illiquid.
We currently operate through a number of unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint ventures with
independent third parties in which we do not have a controlling interest. At October 31, 2013, we had invested an aggregate
of $51.4 million in these joint ventures, including advances to these joint ventures of approximately $4.6 million. In
addition, as part of our strategy, we intend to continue to evaluate additional joint venture opportunities.
These investments involve risks and are highly illiquid. There are a limited number of sources willing to provide
acquisition, development, and construction financing to land development and homebuilding joint ventures, and if market
conditions become more challenging, it may be difficult or impossible to obtain financing for our joint ventures on
commercially reasonable terms. Over the past few years, we have been unable to obtain financing for newly created joint
ventures. In addition, we lack a controlling interest in these joint ventures and, therefore, are usually unable to require that
our joint ventures sell assets or return invested capital, make additional capital contributions, or take any other action
without the vote of at least one of our venture partners. Therefore, absent partner agreement, we will be unable to liquidate
our joint venture investments to generate cash.
Homebuilders are subject to a number of federal, local, state, and foreign laws and regulations concerning the
development of land, the homebuilding, sales, and customer financing processes and the protection of the environment,
which can cause us to incur delays and costs associated with compliance and which can prohibit or restrict our activity in
some regions or areas.
We are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations that affect the development of land and
homebuilding, sales and customer financing processes, including zoning, density, building standards and mortgage
financing. These laws and regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering governmental authorities. This
can delay or increase the cost of development or homebuilding. In light of recent developments in the home building
industry and the financial markets, federal, state, or local governments may seek to adopt regulations that limit or prohibit
14
homebuilders from providing mortgage financing to their customers. If adopted, any such regulations could adversely
affect future revenues and earnings. In addition, some state and local governments in markets where we operate have
approved, and others may approve, slow-growth or no-growth initiatives that could negatively impact the availability of
land and building opportunities within those areas. Approval of these initiatives could adversely affect our ability to build
and sell homes in the affected markets and/or could require the satisfaction of additional administrative and regulatory
requirements, which could result in slowing the progress or increasing the costs of our homebuilding operations in these
markets. Any such delays or costs could have a negative effect on our future revenues and earnings.
We also are subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of
health and the environment. The particular environmental laws and regulations that apply to any given community vary
greatly according to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions, and the present and former uses of the site.
These environmental laws and regulations may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation,
and/or other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict development and homebuilding activity.
For example, we engaged in discussions with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the U.S.
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding alleged violations of storm water discharge requirements. In resolution of this
matter, in April 2010, we agreed to the terms of a consent decree with the EPA, DOJ and the states of Virginia, Maryland,
West Virginia and the District of Columbia (collectively, the “States”). The consent decree was approved by the federal
district court in August 2010. Under the terms of the consent decree, we paid a fine of $1.0 million collectively to the
United States and the States named above and have agreed to perform under the terms of the consent decree for a minimum
of three years, which includes implementing certain operational and training measures nationwide to facilitate ongoing
compliance with storm water regulations. We received in October 2012 a notice from Region III of the EPA concerning
stipulated penalties, totaling approximately $120,000, based on the extent to which we reportedly did not meet certain
compliance performance specified in the previously reported consent decree entered into in August 2010; we have since
paid the stipulated penalties as assessed, and more recently have paid approximately $8,000 in response to an EPA demand
received in June 2013 for stipulated penalties based on information about our performance under the consent decree for
2012. The consent decree was terminated by court order without objection in December 2013.
In March 2013, we received a letter from the EPA requesting information about our involvement in a housing
redevelopment project in Newark, New Jersey that a Company entity undertook during the 1990s. We understand that the
development is in the vicinity of a former lead smelter and that recent tests on soil samples from properties within the
development conducted by the EPA show elevated levels of lead. We also understand that the smelter operated before the
City of Newark acquired properties, demolished structures existing on them, and sold the properties to the Company entity
in connection with the redevelopment project. We responded to the EPA’s request. In August 2013, we were notified that
the EPA considers us a potentially responsible party (or “PRP”) with respect to the site, that the EPA believes the site
requires cleanup, and that the EPA is proposing that we address contamination at the site. We have begun preliminary
discussions with the EPA concerning a possible resolution but do not know the scope or extent of the Company’s
obligations, if any, that may arise from the site and, therefore cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have a
material impact on the Company.
We anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the
future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive
compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In
addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or
approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in
policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretations and application.
Several other homebuilders have received inquiries from regulatory agencies regarding the potential for
homebuilders using contractors to be deemed employers of the employees of their contractors under certain circumstances.
Contractors are independent of the homebuilders that contract with them under normal management practices and the terms
of trade contracts and subcontracts within the industry; however, if regulatory agencies reclassify the employees of
contractors as employees of homebuilders, homebuilders using contractors could be responsible for wage, hour, and other
employment-related liabilities of their contractors.
Product liability litigation and warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of business may be costly.
As a homebuilder, we are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course
of business. Such claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be costly. For example, in the past we have
received construction defect and home warranty claims associated with, and we were involved in a multidistrict litigation
15
concerning, allegedly defective drywall manufactured in China (“Chinese Drywall”) that may have been responsible for
noxious smells and accelerated corrosion of certain metals in certain homes we have constructed. We remediated certain
homes in response to such claims and settled the litigation. In addition, the amount and scope of coverage offered by
insurance companies is currently limited, and this coverage may be further restricted and become more costly. If we are not
able to obtain adequate insurance against such claims, if the costs associated with such claims significantly exceed the
amount of our insurance coverage, or if our insurers do not pay on claims under our policies (whether because of dispute,
inability, or otherwise), we may experience losses that could hurt our financial results. Our financial results could also be
adversely affected if we were to experience an unusually high number of claims or unusually severe claims. Our insurance
companies have the right to review our claims and claims history, and do so from time to time, and could decline to pay on
such claims if such reviews determine the claims did not meet the terms for coverage. Additionally, we may need to
significantly increase our construction defect and home warranty reserves as a result of insurance not being available for
any of the reasons discussed above, such claims or the results of our annual actuarial study.
Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have
sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations or warranties.
Our financial services segment originates mortgages, primarily for our homebuilding customers. Substantially all
of the mortgage loans originated are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing
released, nonrecourse basis, although we remain liable for certain limited representations, such as fraud, and warranties
related to loan sales. Accordingly, mortgage investors have in the past and could in the future seek to have us buy back
loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited
representations or warranties. We believe there continues to be an industry-wide issue with the number of purchaser claims
in which purchasers purport to have found inaccuracies related to sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan
sale agreements. We have established reserves for potential losses; however, there can be no assurance that we will not
have significant liabilities in respect of such claims in the future, which could exceed our reserves, or that the impact of
such claims on our results of operations will not be material.
We compete on several levels with homebuilders that may have greater sales and financial resources, which could hurt
future earnings.
We compete not only for home buyers but also for desirable properties, financing, raw materials, and skilled labor
often within larger subdivisions designed, planned, and developed by other homebuilders. Our competitors include other
local, regional, and national homebuilders, some of which have greater sales and financial resources.
The competitive conditions in the homebuilding industry together with current market conditions have, and could
continue to, result in:
• difficulty in acquiring suitable land at acceptable prices;
• increased selling incentives;
• lower sales; or
• delays in construction.
Any of these problems could increase costs and/or lower profit margins.
We may have difficulty in obtaining the additional financing required to operate and develop our business.
Our operations require significant amounts of cash, and we may be required to seek additional capital, whether
from sales of debt or equity securities or borrowing additional money, for the future growth and development of our
business. The terms or availability of additional capital is uncertain. Moreover, the agreements governing our outstanding
debt instruments contain provisions that restrict the debt we may incur in the future and our ability to pay dividends on
equity. If we are not successful in obtaining sufficient capital, it could reduce our sales and may hinder our future growth
and results of operations. In addition, pledging substantially all of our assets to support our senior secured notes may make
it more difficult to raise additional financing in the future.
16
Our future growth may include additional acquisitions of companies that may not be successfully integrated and may not
achieve expected benefits.
Acquisitions of companies have contributed to our historical growth and may again be a component of our growth
strategy in the future. In the future, we may acquire businesses, some of which may be significant. As a result of
acquisitions of companies, we may need to seek additional financing and integrate product lines, dispersed operations, and
distinct corporate cultures. These integration efforts may not succeed or may distract our management from operating our
existing business. Additionally, we may not be able to enhance our earnings as a result of acquisitions. Our failure to
successfully identify and manage future acquisitions could harm our operating results.
Our controlling stockholders are able to exercise significant influence over us.
Members of the Hovnanian family, including Ara K. Hovnanian, our chairman of the board, president, and chief
executive officer, have voting control, through personal holdings, the limited partnership and the limited liability company
established for members of Mr. Hovnanian’s family, family trusts and shares held by the estate of our former chairman,
Kevork S. Hovnanian, of Class A and Class B common stock that enables them to cast approximately 56% of the votes that
may be cast by the holders of our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock combined. Their combined stock
ownership enables them to exert significant control over us, including power to control the election of the Board of
Directors and to approve matters presented to our stockholders. This concentration of ownership may also make some
transactions, including mergers or other changes in control, more difficult or impossible without their support. Also,
because of their combined voting power, circumstances may occur in which their interests could be in conflict with the
interests of other stakeholders.
Our net operating loss carryforwards could be substantially limited if we experience an ownership change as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code.
Based on recent impairments and our current financial performance, we generated a federal net operating loss
carryforward of $1.5 billion through the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, and we may generate net operating loss
carryforwards in future years.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) contains rules that limit the ability of a company that
undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock over a three-
year period, to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership
change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership shifts among stockholders owning directly or indirectly
5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by the company.
If we undergo an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 as a result of future transactions involving our
stock, including purchases or sales of stock between 5% shareholders, our ability to use our net operating loss
carryforwards and to recognize certain built-in losses would be subject to the limitations of Section 382. Depending on the
resulting limitation, a significant portion of our net operating loss carryforwards could expire before we would be able to
use them. A limitation imposed under Section 382 on our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards could have a
negative impact on our financial position and results of operations.
In August 2008, we announced that the Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”)
designed to preserve shareholder value and the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with net loss carryforwards
and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Code, and on December 5, 2008, our stockholders approved the Board’s
decision to adopt the Rights Plan. The Rights Plan is intended to act as a deterrent to any person or group acquiring 4.9% or
more of our outstanding Class A common stock (any such person an “Acquiring Person”), without the approval of the
Company’s Board of Directors. Subject to the terms, provisions and conditions of the Rights Plan, if and when they become
exercisable, each right would entitle its holder to purchase from the Company one ten-thousandth of a share of the
Company’s Series B Junior Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $35.00 per share (the “purchase price”). The rights will
not be exercisable until the earlier of (i) 10 business days after a public announcement by us that a person or group has
become an Acquiring Person and (ii) 10 business days after the commencement of a tender or exchange offer by a person
or group for 4.9% of the Class A common stock (the “distribution date”). If issued, each fractional share of Series B Junior
Preferred Stock would give the stockholder approximately the same dividend, voting and liquidation rights as does one
share of the Company’s Class A common stock. However, prior to exercise, a right does not give its holder any rights as a
stockholder of the Company, including without limitation any dividend, voting, or liquidation rights. After the distribution
date, each holder of a right, other than rights beneficially owned by the Acquiring Person (which will thereupon become
void), will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a right and payment of the purchase price, that number of
17
shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, as the case may be, having a market value of two times the
purchase price. After the distribution date, our Board of Directors may exchange the rights (other than rights owned by an
Acquiring Person which will have become void), in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock, or
a fractional share of Series B Junior Preferred Stock (or of a share of a similar class or series of Hovnanian’s preferred
stock having similar rights, preferences, and privileges) of equivalent value, per right (subject to adjustment).
In addition, on December 5, 2008, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to
restrict certain transfers of our common stock in order to preserve the tax treatment of our net operating loss carryforwards
and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Code. Subject to certain exceptions pertaining to pre-existing 5% stockholders
and Class B stockholders, the transfer restrictions in the amended Certificate of Incorporation generally restrict any direct
or indirect transfer (such as transfers of the Company’s stock that result from the transfer of interests in other entities that
own the Company’s stock) if the effect would be to: (i) increase the direct or indirect ownership of the Company’s stock by
any person (or public group) from less than 5% to 5% or more of the Company’s stock; (ii) increase the percentage of the
Company’s stock owned directly or indirectly by a person (or public group) owning or deemed to own 5% or more of the
Company’s stock; or (iii) create a new “public group” (as defined in the applicable United States Treasury regulations).
Utility shortages and outages or rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect on our operations.
In prior years, the areas in which we operate in California have experienced power shortages, including periods
without electrical power, as well as significant fluctuations in utility costs. We may incur additional costs and may not be
able to complete construction on a timely basis if such power shortages and outages and utility rate fluctuations continue.
Furthermore, power shortages and outages and rate fluctuations may adversely affect the regional economies in which we
operate, which may reduce demand for our homes. Our operations may be adversely affected if further rate fluctuations
and/or power shortages and outages occur in California, the Northeast, or in our other markets.
Geopolitical risks and market disruption could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Geopolitical events, such as the aftermath of the war with Iraq and the continuing involvement in Afghanistan,
may have a substantial impact on the economy and the housing market. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 had an impact on our business and the occurrence of similar events in the future
cannot be ruled out. The war and the continuing involvement in Afghanistan, terrorism, and related geopolitical risks have
created many economic and political uncertainties, some of which may have additional material adverse effects on the U.S.
economy, our customers and, in turn, our results of operations and financial condition.
ITEM 1B
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2
PROPERTIES
We own a 69,000 square-foot office complex located in the Northeast that serves as our corporate headquarters.
We own 215,000 square feet of office and warehouse space throughout the Midwest. We lease approximately 488,000
square feet of space for our segments located in the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and
West. Included in this amount is 88,000 square feet of abandoned lease space.
ITEM 3
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, and we are subject to extensive and complex
regulations that affect the development and home building, sales, and customer financing processes, including zoning,
density, building standards, and mortgage financing. These regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering
governmental authorities. This can delay or increase the cost of development or homebuilding.
We also are subject to a variety of local, state, federal, and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of
health and the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given community vary greatly according
to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental
18
laws may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation and/or other costs, and can prohibit or
severely restrict development and homebuilding activity.
We received in October 2012 a notice from Region III of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
concerning stipulated penalties, totaling approximately $120,000, based on the extent to which we reportedly did not meet
certain compliance performance specified in the previously reported consent decree entered into in August 2010; we have
since paid the stipulated penalties as assessed, and more recently have paid approximately $8,000 in response to an EPA
demand received in June 2013 for stipulated penalties based on information about our performance under the consent
decree for 2012. The consent decree was terminated by court order without objection in December 2013.
In March 2013, we received a letter from the EPA requesting information about our involvement in a housing
redevelopment project in Newark, New Jersey that a Company entity undertook during the 1990s. We understand that the
development is in the vicinity of a former lead smelter and that recent tests on soil samples from properties within the
development conducted by the EPA show elevated levels of lead. We also understand that the smelter operated before the
City of Newark acquired properties, demolished structures existing on them, and sold the properties to the Company entity
in connection with the redevelopment project. We responded to the EPA’s request. In August 2013, we were notified that
the EPA considers us a potentially responsible party (or “PRP”) with respect to the site, that the EPA believes the site
requires cleanup, and that the EPA is proposing that we address contamination at the site. We have begun preliminary
discussions with the EPA concerning a possible resolution but do not know the scope or extent of the Company's
obligations, if any, that may arise from the site and therefore cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have a
material impact on the Company.
We anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the
future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive
compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In
addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or
approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in
policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretations and application.
The Company is also involved in the following litigation:
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and K. Hovnanian Venture I, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Company Defendants”) have
been named as defendants in a class action suit. The action was filed by Mike D’Andrea and Tracy D’Andrea, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Gloucester County. The action was
initially filed on May 8, 2006 alleging that the HVAC systems installed in certain of the Company’s homes are in violation
of applicable New Jersey building codes and are a potential safety issue. On December 14, 2011, the Superior Court
granted class certification; the potential class is 1,065 homes. The Company Defendants filed a request to take an
interlocutory appeal regarding the class certification decision. The Appellate Division denied the request, and the Company
Defendants filed a request for interlocutory review by the New Jersey Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to the
Appellate Division for a review on the merits of the appeal on May 8, 2012. The Appellate Division, on remand, heard oral
arguments on December 4, 2012, reviewing the Superior Court’s original finding of class certification. On June 18, 2013,
the Appellate Division affirmed class certification. On July 3, 2013, the Company Defendants appealed the June 2013
Appellate Division’s decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which elected not to hear the appeal on October 22,
2013. Accordingly, the matter is proceeding in the Superior Court and discovery is ongoing. The Company Defendants
have pending a motion to consolidate an indemnity action they filed against various manufacturer and sub-contractor
defendants so that these parties will be required to participate directly in the class action. The plaintiff class seeks
unspecified damages as well as treble damages pursuant to the NJ Consumer Fraud Act. The Company Defendants believe
there is insurance coverage available for this action. It is not possible to estimate a loss or range of loss related to this
matter at this time.
ITEM 4
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information on executive officers of the registrant is incorporated herein from Part III, Item 10.
19
Part II
ITEM 5
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Class A Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “HOV” and was held
by 503 stockholders of record at December 16, 2013. There is no established public trading market for our Class B
Common Stock, which was held by 241 stockholders of record at December 16, 2013. In order to trade Class B Common
Stock, the shares must be converted into Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. The high and low closing sales
prices for our Class A Common Stock were as follows for each fiscal quarter during the years ended October 31, 2013 and
2012:
Quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
High
October 31, 2013
Low
$4.42
$4.76
$5.20
$4.93
$7.00
$6.32
$6.43
$5.53
October 31, 2012
Low
$1.23
$1.88
$1.61
$2.25
High
$2.67
$3.24
$2.94
$4.44
Certain debt instruments to which we are a party contain restrictions on the payment of cash dividends. As a result
of the most restrictive of these provisions, we are not currently able to pay any cash dividends. We have never paid a cash
dividend to common stockholders.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
None.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
No shares of our Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock were purchased by or on behalf of the
Company or any affiliated purchaser during the fiscal fourth quarter of 2013. The maximum number of shares that may yet
be purchased under the Company’s repurchase plans or programs is 0.5 million.
20
ITEM 6
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data and should be read in conjunction with Item
7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Year Ended
Summary Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data
(In thousands, Except Per Share
Data)
Revenues
Expenses excluding inventory
impairment loss and land option
write-offs
Inventory impairment loss and land
option write-offs
Total Expenses
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of
debt
Income (loss) from unconsolidated
joint ventures
Income (loss) before income taxes
State and federal income tax
(benefit) provision
Net income (loss)
Per share data:
Basic:
Income (loss) per common share
Weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding
Assuming dilution:
Income (loss) per common share
Weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding
Summary Consolidated Balance
Sheet Data
(In thousands)
Total assets
Mortgages and lines of credit
Senior secured notes, senior notes,
senior amortizing notes, senior
exchangeable notes and TEU
senior subordinated amortizing
notes (net of discount)
Total equity deficit
October 31,
October 31,
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
2011
2010
$
1,851,253 $
1,485,353 $
1,134,907 $
1,371,842 $
October 31,
2009
1,596,290
1,835,633
1,550,406
1,323,316
1,557,428
1,972,978
4,965
1,840,598
12,530
1,562,936
101,749
1,425,065
135,699
1,693,127
659,475
2,632,453
(760)
(29,066)
7,528
25,047
410,185
12,040
21,935
5,401
(101,248)
(8,958)
(291,588)
956
(295,282)
(46,041)
(672,019)
(9,360)
31,295 $
(35,051)
(66,197) $
(5,501)
(286,087) $
(297,870)
2,588 $
44,693
(716,712)
0.22 $
(0.52) $
(2.85) $
0.03 $
(9.16)
145,087
126,350
100,444
78,691
78,238
0.22 $
(0.52) $
(2.85) $
0.03 $
(9.16)
162,329
126,350
100,444
79,683
78,238
$
$
$
October 31,
October 31,
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
2011
2010
$
$
1,759,130 $
172,299 $
1,684,250 $
164,562 $
1,602,180 $
95,598 $
1,817,560 $
98,613 $
October 31,
2009
2,024,577
77,364
$
$
1,529,445 $
(432,799) $
1,542,196 $
(485,345) $
1,602,770 $
(496,602) $
1,616,347 $
(337,938) $
1,751,701
(348,868)
21
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends, earnings consist of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes and
income or loss from equity investees, plus fixed charges and distributed income of equity investees, less interest
capitalized. Fixed charges consist of all interest incurred, plus that portion of operating lease rental expense (33%) deemed
to be representative of interest, plus the amortization of debt issuance costs and bond discounts. Combined fixed charges
and preferred stock dividends consist of fixed charges and preferred stock dividends declared. Due to covenant restrictions,
we have been prohibited from paying preferred stock dividends beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The
following table sets forth the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and the ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends for each of the periods indicated:
Years Ended October 31,
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
(a)
(b)
1.2
1.2
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(a) Earnings for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were insufficient to cover fixed charges for such
period by $105.1 million, $272.9 million, $273.8 million, and $628.3 million, respectively.
(b) Earnings for the years ended October 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were insufficient to cover fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends for such period by $105.1 million, $272.9 million, $273.8 million and $628.3 million,
respectively. Due to restrictions in our indentures for our senior and senior secured notes, we are currently prohibited
from paying dividends on our preferred stock and did not make any dividend payments in fiscal 2013, 2012, 2011,
2010, and 2009.
ITEM 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
During fiscal 2013, the housing market continued to strengthen, and, as a result, we experienced further positive
operating trends, including improvements in several metrics for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to the year
ended October 31, 2012, such as: net contract growth of 7.9%, an increase in gross margin percentage, before cost of sales
interest expense and land charges, from 17.8% to 20.1% and a decrease in selling, general and administrative costs
(including corporate general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of total revenue from 12.8% to 11.9%. In
addition, our contract cancellation rate was 18% for fiscal 2013, which is below what we believe to be a normalized level
of approximately 20%. Active selling communities were 192 and 172 at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net
contracts per average active selling community increased to 30.7 for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to 28.1 in
the same period in the prior year. Net contracts for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 were 6.4% below the same period of the
prior year as a result of the slowdown in the housing market due to the adverse impacts of higher mortgage rates, the
sequester and the government shutdown. However, this negative trend reversed in October and November of 2013, where
net contracts increased slightly over the same periods of the prior year.
Our gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and land charges, and selling, general and
administrative costs (including corporate general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of total revenues also had
favorable variances when comparing sequentially from the third quarter of fiscal 2013 to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Gross margin percentage increased from 20.3% to 22.6% and selling, general and administrative costs (including corporate
general and administrative expenses) as a percentage of revenues decreased from 11.8% to 10.6%, as compared to the third
quarter of fiscal 2013. Cost of sales and selling, general and administrative costs include some fixed costs that are not
impacted by delivery volume. Therefore, as deliveries increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2013 to the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2013, selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues improved. The increase in gross margin
percentage partially resulted from the delivery volume increase, but also was the result of higher home prices that exceeded
increased construction costs in certain markets and an increase in the percentage of deliveries from newly identified
communities (which we define as communities that were controlled subsequent to January 31, 2009), which generally have
higher gross margins than our older communities.
While we are encouraged by the positive operating trends that began in fiscal 2012 and continued into fiscal 2013,
several challenges, such as persistently high unemployment levels, national and global economic weakness and uncertainty,
22
the restrictive mortgage lending environment, higher mortgage interest rates and the potential for more foreclosures,
continue to threaten a recovery in the housing market. Our recent operating results and other national data indicate that the
overall demand for new homes has continued to improve. However, both national new home sales and our home sales
remain below historical levels. Until there is a more robust U.S. economic recovery, we expect national demand for new
homes to remain at below normal levels, with uneven improvement across our operating markets.
During the prolonged downturn of the housing market, we adjusted our approach to land acquisition and
construction practices and shortened our land pipeline, reduced production volumes, and balanced home price and
profitability with sales pace. We delayed and cancelled planned land purchases, renegotiated land prices, and significantly
reduced our total number of controlled lots owned and under option. Additionally, we significantly reduced our total
number of speculative homes put into production. Since January 2009, however, we began to see more opportunities to
purchase land at prices that made economic sense in light of our then current sales prices and sales paces and plan to
continue pursuing such land acquisitions. New land purchases at pricing that we believe will generate appropriate
investment returns and drive greater operating efficiencies are needed to return to sustained profitability. During fiscal
2013, we opened for sale 91 new communities, purchased approximately 6,200 lots within 236 newly identified
communities (which we define as communities that were controlled subsequent to January 31, 2009), and optioned
approximately 12,100 lots in 230 newly identified communities. As we have experienced increased sales pace over the past
year, causing communities to sell out more rapidly, we continue to consider and make new land acquisitions to replenish or
grow our community count. As a result, our active community count increased by 20 communities from October 31, 2012
to 192 communities at October 31, 2013. We have also continued to closely evaluate and control selling, general and
administrative expenses, including corporate general and administrative expenses. While homebuilding selling, general and
administrative expenses increased $23.7 million from $142.1 million in fiscal 2012 to $165.8 million for fiscal 2013, in
connection with our increased revenues, these expenses as a percentage of total homebuilding revenues decreased from
9.8% to 9.2% due to the revenue growth across our operating segments. Corporate general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of total revenue decreased from 3.2% in fiscal 2012 to 2.9% in fiscal 2013. Given the persistence of difficult
market conditions, improving the efficiency of our selling, general and administrative expenses will continue to be a
significant area of focus.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management believes that the following critical accounting policies require its most significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements:
Income Recognition from Home and Land Sales - We are primarily engaged in the development, construction,
marketing and sale of residential single-family and multi-family homes where the planned construction cycle is less than 12
months. For these homes, in accordance with Accounting Standards Certification (ASC) 360-20, “Property, Plant and
Equipment - Real Estate Sales” (“ASC 360-20”), revenue is recognized when title is conveyed to the buyer, adequate initial
and continuing investments have been received, and there is no continued involvement. In situations where the buyer’s
financing is originated by our mortgage subsidiary and the buyer has not made an adequate initial investment or continuing
investment as prescribed by ASC 360-20, the profit on such sales is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a
third-party investor has been completed.
Income Recognition from Mortgage Loans - Our Financial Services segment originates mortgages, primarily for
our homebuilding customers. We use mandatory investor commitments and forward sales of mortgage-backed securities to
hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure on agency and government loans.
We elected the fair value option for our mortgage loans held for sale in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial
Instruments,” which permits us to measure our loans held for sale at fair value. Management believes that the election of
the fair value option for loans held for sale improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to
apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage
market on a servicing released, nonrecourse basis, although the Company remains liable for certain limited representations,
such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate
them for losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations and
warranties. We believe there continues to be an industry-wide issue with the number of purchaser claims in which
purchasers purport to have found inaccuracies related to the sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan sale
agreements. We have established reserves for probable losses.
23
Inventories - Inventories consist of land, land development, home construction costs, capitalized interest, and
construction overhead and property taxes. Construction costs are accumulated during the period of construction and
charged to cost of sales under specific identification methods. Land, land development, and common facility costs are
allocated based on buildable acres to product types within each community, then charged to cost of sales equally based
upon the number of homes to be constructed in each product type.
We record inventories in our consolidated balance sheets at cost unless the inventory is determined to be impaired,
in which case the inventory is written down to its fair value. Our inventories consist of the following three components:
(1) sold and unsold homes and lots under development, which includes all construction, land, capitalized interest, and land
development costs related to started homes and land under development in our active communities; (2) land and land
options held for future development or sale, which includes all costs related to land in our communities in planning or
mothballed communities; and (3) consolidated inventory not owned, which includes all costs related to specific
performance options, variable interest entities, and other options, which consists primarily of model homes financed with
an investor and inventory related to land banking arrangements.
We decide to mothball (or stop development on) certain communities when we determine that current market
conditions do not justify further investment at that time. When we decide to mothball a community, the inventory is
reclassified on our consolidated balance sheets from "Sold and unsold homes and lots under development" to "Land and
land options held for future development or sale." As of October 31, 2013, the net book value associated with our 50
mothballed communities was $115.9 million, net of impairment charges recorded in prior periods of $431.6 million. We
regularly review communities to determine if mothballing is appropriate. During fiscal 2013, we mothballed one
community, re-activated three previously mothballed communities, and sold one mothballed community.
From time to time we enter into option agreements that include specific performance requirements, whereby we
are required to purchase a minimum number of lots. Because of our obligation to purchase these lots, for accounting
purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, we are required to record this inventory on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. As of October 31, 2013, we had $0.8 million of specific performance options recorded on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets to “Consolidated inventory not owned – specific performance options,” with a corresponding amount recorded to
“Liabilities from inventory not owned.”
“Consolidated inventory not owned – other options” consists of certain model sale leasebacks and land banking
arrangements, and other options that were included on our balance sheet in accordance with GAAP. During fiscal 2013, we
sold and leased back certain of our model homes with the right to participate in the potential profit when each home is sold
to a third party at the end of the respective lease. As a result of our continued involvement, for accounting purposes in
accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, these sale and leaseback transactions are considered a financing rather than a sale.
Therefore, for purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $47.6 million was recorded
to “Consolidated inventory not owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $45.7 million recorded to
“Liabilities from inventory not owned.”
In addition, we entered into a land banking arrangement in fiscal 2012 with GSO Capital Partners LP ("GSO"),
that continued in fiscal 2013, whereby we sold a portfolio of our land parcels to GSO, and GSO provided us an option to
purchase back finished lots on a quarterly basis. Because of our option to repurchase these parcels, for accounting purposes,
in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, this transaction is considered a financing rather than a sale. For purposes of our
Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $52.4 million was recorded as “Consolidated inventory not
owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $41.4 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”
for the amount of net cash received from the transactions.
The recoverability of inventories and other long-lived assets is assessed in accordance with the provisions of ASC
360-10, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Overall” (“ASC 360-10”). ASC 360-10 requires long-lived assets, including
inventories, held for development to be evaluated for impairment based on undiscounted future cash flows of the assets at
the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows. As such, we evaluate inventories for impairment at the
individual community level, the lowest level of discrete cash flows that we measure.
We evaluate inventories of communities under development and held for future development for impairment when
indicators of potential impairment are present. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, decreases in local
housing market values, decreases in gross margins or sales absorption rates, decreases in net sales prices (base sales price
net of sales incentives), or actual or projected operating or cash flow losses. The assessment of communities for indication
of impairment is performed quarterly. As part of this process, we prepare detailed budgets for all of our communities at
24
least semi-annually and identify those communities with a projected operating loss. For those communities with projected
losses, we estimate the remaining undiscounted future cash flows and compare those to the carrying value of the
community, to determine if the carrying value of the asset is recoverable.
The projected operating profits, losses, or cash flows of each community can be significantly impacted by our
estimates of the following:
● future base selling prices;
● future home sales incentives;
● future home construction and land development costs; and
● future sales absorption pace and cancellation rates.
These estimates are dependent upon specific market conditions for each community. While we consider available
information to determine what we believe to be our best estimates as of the end of a quarterly reporting period, these
estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change. Local market-specific
conditions that may impact our estimates for a community include:
● the intensity of competition within a market, including available home sales prices and home sales incentives
offered by our competitors;
● the current sales absorption pace for both our communities and competitor communities;
● community specific attributes, such as location, availability of lots in the market, desirability and uniqueness of
our community, and the size and style of homes currently being offered;
● potential for alternative product offerings to respond to local market conditions;
● changes by management in the sales strategy of the community;
● current local market economic and demographic conditions and related trends of forecasts; and
● existing home inventory supplies, including foreclosures and short sales.
These and other local market-specific conditions that may be present are considered by management in preparing
projection assumptions for each community. The sales objectives can differ between our communities, even within a given
market. For example, facts and circumstances in a given community may lead us to price our homes with the objective of
yielding a higher sales absorption pace, while facts and circumstances in another community may lead us to price our
homes to minimize deterioration in our gross margins, although it may result in a slower sales absorption pace. In addition,
the key assumptions included in our estimate of future undiscounted cash flows may be interrelated. For example, a
decrease in estimated base sales price or an increase in homes sales incentives may result in a corresponding increase in
sales absorption pace. Additionally, a decrease in the average sales price of homes to be sold and closed in future reporting
periods for one community that has not been generating what management believes to be an adequate sales absorption pace
may impact the estimated cash flow assumptions of a nearby community. Changes in our key assumptions, including
estimated construction and development costs, absorption pace and selling strategies, could materially impact future cash
flow and fair-value estimates. Due to the number of possible scenarios that would result from various changes in these
factors, we do not believe it is possible to develop a sensitivity analysis with a level of precision that would be meaningful.
If the undiscounted cash flows are more than the carrying value of the community, then the carrying amount is
recoverable, and no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying
amount, then the community is deemed impaired and is written-down to its fair value. We determine the estimated fair
value of each community by determining the present value of its estimated future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risk of the respective community, or in limited circumstances, prices for land in recent comparable
sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other
than in a forced liquidation sale), and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties. Our discount rates used for
all impairments recorded from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2013 ranged from 16.8% to 19.8%. The estimated future
cash flow assumptions are virtually the same for both our recoverability and fair value assessments. Should the estimates or
25
expectations used in determining estimated cash flows or fair value, including discount rates, decrease or differ from
current estimates in the future, we may be required to recognize additional impairments related to current and future
communities. The impairment of a community is allocated to each lot on a relative fair value basis.
From time to time, we write off deposits and approval, engineering and capitalized interest costs when we
determine that it is no longer probable that we will exercise options to buy land in specific locations or when we redesign
communities and/or abandon certain engineering costs. In deciding not to exercise a land option, we take into consideration
changes in market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the willingness of land sellers to modify terms of the
land option contract (including timing of land takedowns), and the availability and best use of our capital, among other
factors. The write-off is recorded in the period it is deemed not probable that the optioned property will be acquired. In
certain instances, we have been able to recover deposits and other pre-acquisition costs that were previously written off.
These recoveries have not been significant in comparison to the total costs written off.
Inventories held for sale are land parcels ready for sale in their current condition, where we have decided not to
build homes but are instead actively marketing for sale. These land parcels represented $2.7 million of our total inventories
at October 31, 2013, and are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. In determining fair
value for land held for sale, management considers, among other things, prices for land in recent comparable sale
transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than
in a forced liquidation sale) and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties.
Insurance Deductible Reserves - For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general
liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our
deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit.
Our aggregate retention in 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. We do
not have a deductible on our worker's compensation insurance. Reserves for estimated losses for construction defects,
warranty, bodily injury and workers’ compensation claims have been established using the assistance of a third-party
actuary. We engage a third-party actuary that uses our historical warranty and construction defect data and
worker's compensation data to assist our management in estimating our unpaid claims, claim adjustment expenses and
incurred but not reported claims reserves for the risks that we are assuming under the general liability and worker's
compensation programs. The estimates include provisions for inflation, claims handling and legal fees. These estimates are
subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in construction defect claims relative to our
markets and the types of products we build, claim settlement patterns, insurance industry practices, and legal
interpretations, among others. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated liability
amounts, actual future costs could differ significantly from our currently estimated amounts.
Land Options – Deposits on options to acquire improved or unimproved home sites and pre-development costs
incurred on this land under option are capitalized. Such amounts are either included as part of the purchase price if the land
is acquired or charged to operations if we determine we will not exercise the option. If the options are with variable interest
entities and we are the primary beneficiary, we record the land under option on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under
“Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory not owned.” The evaluation of
whether or not we are the primary beneficiary can require significant judgment. Similarly, if the option obligation is to
purchase under specific performance or has terms that require us to record it as financing, then we record the option on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory
not owned.” We record costs associated with other options on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Land and land
options held for future development or sale.”
Unconsolidated Homebuilding and Land Development Joint Ventures - Investments in unconsolidated
homebuilding and land development joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the
equity method, we recognize our proportionate share of earnings and losses earned by the joint venture upon the delivery of
lots or homes to third parties. Our ownership interest in joint ventures varies but our voting interests are generally less than
or equal to 50%. In determining whether or not we must consolidate joint ventures where we are the managing member of
the joint venture, we assess whether the other partners have specific rights to overcome the presumption of control by us as
the manager of the joint venture. In most cases, the presumption is overcome because the joint venture agreements require
that both partners agree on establishing the significant operating and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets,
in the ordinary course of business. The evaluation of whether or not we control a venture can require significant judgment.
In accordance with ASC 323-10, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Overall” (“ASC 323-10”), we assess
our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the
investment below its carrying amount is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate
our equity investments for impairment based on the joint venture’s projected cash flows. This process requires significant
26
management judgment and estimates. During fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013, there were no write-downs of our joint venture
investments.
Post-Development Completion and Warranty Costs - In those instances where a development is substantially
completed and sold and we have additional construction work to be incurred, an estimated liability is provided to cover the
cost of such work. We accrue for warranty costs that are covered under our existing general liability and construction defect
policy as part of our general liability insurance deductible. This accrual is expensed as selling, general, and administrative
costs. For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per
occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal
2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal
2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. In addition, we establish a
warranty accrual for lower cost-related issues to cover home repairs, community amenities, and land development
infrastructure that are not covered under our general liability and construction defect policy. We accrue an estimate for
these warranty costs as part of cost of sales at the time each home is closed and title and possession have been transferred to
the homebuyer. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the amount of warranty
costs recognized in cost of goods sold and administrative expenses.
Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts recorded for
financial reporting and for income tax purposes. If the combination of future years’ income (or loss) combined with the
reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such losses can be carried back to prior years or carried forward to future
years to recover the deferred tax assets. In accordance with ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes - Overall” (“ASC 740-10”), we
evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740-10 requires that
companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence
using a “more-likely-than-not” standard. See “Total Taxes” below under “Results of Operations” for further discussion of
the valuation allowances.
In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we recognize tax liabilities in
accordance with ASC 740-10, for more likely than not exposures. We re-evaluate the exposures associated with our tax
positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors such as changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax
law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Determining whether an uncertain tax position is effectively settled
requires judgment. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have
established a liability is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and
income tax provision in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, or the statute of limitations
expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. Due to
the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a liability that is materially different
from our current estimate. Any such changes will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period
in which they are determined.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There have been no accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented that we believe
will materially impact our financial statements.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our operations consist primarily of residential housing development and sales in the Northeast (New Jersey,
Pennsylvania), the Mid-Atlantic (Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C., West Virginia), the Midwest (Illinois,
Minnesota, Ohio), the Southeast (Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina), the Southwest (Arizona, Texas), and
the West (California). In addition, we provide certain financial services to our homebuilding customers.
We have historically funded our homebuilding and financial services operations with cash flows from operating
activities, borrowings under our bank credit facilities (when we have had such facilities for our homebuilding operations)
and the issuance of new debt and equity securities. During the prolonged housing market downturn that began in late 2006,
we had been operating with a primary focus to generate cash flows from operations through reductions in assets during
fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2009. The generation of cash flow, together with debt repurchases and exchanges at prices below
par, allowed us to reduce debt (notes payable, excluding accrued interest) during fiscal 2009 by approximately $754
million. Since the latter half of fiscal 2009, we have seen more opportunities to purchase land at prices that make economic
27
sense given the then-current home sales prices and sales paces. As such, since that time, despite acquiring new land at
higher levels than in the previous few years, we have been able to further reduce our debt by approximately $222 million.
Our homebuilding cash balance at October 31, 2013 increased by $60.8 million from October 31, 2012. The
significant uses of cash during fiscal 2013 were primarily due to spending $503.0 million on land and land development.
The remaining change in cash came from normal operations, as well a $31.4 million reduction of homebuilding restricted
cash. Most of this restricted cash became unrestricted as the letters of credit the cash collateralized were released
during fiscal 2013.
Our cash uses during fiscal 2013 and 2012 were for operating expenses, land purchases, land deposits, land
development, construction spending, financing transactions, debt payments and repurchases, state income taxes, interest
payments and investments in joint ventures. During these periods, we provided for our cash requirements from available
cash on hand, financing transactions, debt and equity issuances, housing and land sales, model sale leasebacks, land
banking deals, financial service revenues and other revenues. We believe that these sources of cash will be
sufficient through fiscal 2014 to finance our working capital requirements and other needs. In June 2013, we enhanced our
liquidity by entering into a $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility, discussed below.
Our net income (loss) historically does not approximate cash flow from operating activities. The difference
between net income (loss) and cash flow from operating activities is primarily caused by changes in inventory levels
together with changes in receivables, prepaid and other assets, mortgage loans held for sale, interest and other accrued
liabilities, deferred income taxes, accounts payable and other liabilities, and noncash charges relating to depreciation,
amortization of computer software costs, stock compensation awards and impairment losses for inventory. When we are
expanding our operations, inventory levels, prepaids, and other assets increase causing cash flow from operating activities
to decrease. Certain liabilities also increase as operations expand and partially offset the negative effect on cash flow from
operations caused by the increase in inventory levels, prepaids and other assets. Similarly, as our mortgage operations
expand, net income from these operations increases, but for cash flow purposes net income is offset by the net change in
mortgage assets and liabilities. The opposite is true as our investment in new land purchases and development of new
communities decrease, which is what happened during the last half of fiscal 2007 through fiscal 2009, allowing us to
generate positive cash flow from operations during this period. Since the latter part of fiscal 2009 cumulative through the
first three quarters of fiscal 2013, as a result of the new land purchases and land development we have used cash in
operations as we add new communities. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we generated a positive cash flow from
operations, which was the result of a high volume of home deliveries. Looking forward, given the unstable housing market,
it will continue to be difficult to generate positive cash flow from operations until we return to sustained profitability.
However, we will continue to make adjustments to our structure and our business plans in order to maximize our liquidity
while also taking steps to return to sustained profitability, including through land acquisitions.
On July 3, 2001, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up to 4 million shares
of Class A Common Stock. We did not repurchase any shares under this program during fiscal 2013 or 2011. During fiscal
2012, we repurchased 0.1 million shares under this program. As of October 31, 2013, the maximum number of shares of
Class A Common Stock that may yet be purchased under this program is 0.5 million. (See Part II, Item 5 for information on
equity purchases).
On July 12, 2005, we issued 5,600 shares of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock, with a liquidation preference of
$25,000 per share. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are not cumulative and are payable at an annual rate of
7.625%. The Series A Preferred Stock is not convertible into the Company’s common stock and is redeemable in whole or
in part at our option at the liquidation preference of the shares. The Series A Preferred Stock is traded as depositary shares,
with each depositary share representing 1/1000th of a share of Series A Preferred Stock. The depositary shares are listed on
the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HOVNP”. In fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, we did not make any dividend
payments on the Series A Preferred Stock as a result of covenant restrictions in our debt instruments. We anticipate that we
will continue to be restricted from paying dividends, which are not cumulative, for the foreseeable future.
On October 20, 2009, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (“K. Hovnanian”) issued $785.0 million ($770.9 million net
of discount) of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due October 15, 2016. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens
and other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the
guarantors. The net proceeds from this issuance, together with cash on hand, were used to fund certain cash tender offers
for our then outstanding 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 and certain
series of our unsecured notes. In May 2011, we issued $12.0 million of additional 10.625% Senior Secured Notes as
discussed below. The 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 were the subject of a tender offer in October 2012, and the
notes that were not tendered in the tender offer were redeemed, as discussed below.
28
On February 9, 2011, we issued 13,512,500 shares of our Class A Common Stock, including 1,762,500 shares
issued pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters, at a price of $4.30 per share.
On February 9, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 7.25% Tangible Equity Units (the “TEUs”), and on
February 14, 2011, we issued an additional 450,000 TEUs pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the
underwriters. Each TEU initially consists of (i) a prepaid stock purchase contract (each a “Purchase Contract”) and (ii) a
senior subordinated amortizing note due February 15, 2014 (each, a “Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note”). As of
October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had an aggregate principal amount of $2.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of Senior
Subordinated Amortizing Notes outstanding. On each February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15, K. Hovnanian
will pay holders of Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes equal quarterly cash installments of $0.453125 per Senior
Subordinated Amortizing Note, which cash payments in the aggregate will be equivalent to 7.25% per year with respect to
each $25 stated amount of TEUs. Each installment constitutes a payment of interest (at a rate of 12.072% per annum) and a
partial repayment of principal on the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, allocated as set forth in the amortization
schedule provided in the indenture under which the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes were issued. The Senior
Subordinated Amortizing Notes have a scheduled final installment payment date of February 15, 2014. If we elect to settle
the Purchase Contracts early, holders of the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes will have the right to require K.
Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, except in certain circumstances as
described in the indenture governing Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes.
Unless settled earlier, on February 15, 2014 (subject to postponement under certain circumstances), each Purchase
Contract will automatically settle and we will deliver a number of shares of Class A Common Stock based on the
applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement, which will be between 4.7655 shares and 5.8140
shares per Purchase Contract (subject to adjustment). Each TEU may be separated into its constituent Purchase Contract
and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the TEUs, and the separate components may be
combined to create a TEU. The Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note component of the TEUs is recorded as debt, and the
Purchase Contract component of the TEUs is recorded in equity as additional paid in capital. We have recorded $68.1
million, the initial fair value of the Purchase Contracts, as additional paid in capital. As of October 31, 2013, 2.2
million Purchase Contracts have been converted into 10.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we exchanged pursuant to agreements with bondholders approximately
$3.1 million aggregate principal amount of our Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes for shares of our Class A Common
Stock, as discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These transactions resulted in a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations as “Gain on extinguishment of debt.”
On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued $155.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes
due 2015. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below. The net proceeds from the
issuances of the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015, Class A Common Stock described above, and Units were approximately
$286.2 million, a portion of which were used to fund the purchase through tender offers, on February 14, 2011, of the
following series of K. Hovnanian’s then outstanding senior and senior subordinated notes: approximately $24.6 million
aggregate principal amount of 8.0% Senior Notes due 2012, $44.1 million aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2012 and $29.2 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013
(the “2013 Notes” and, together with the 2012 Senior Notes and the 2012 Senior Subordinated Notes, the “Tender Offer
Notes”). On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian called for redemption on March 15, 2011 all Tender Offer Notes that were
not tendered in the tender offers for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $60.1 million. Such redemptions were
funded with proceeds from the offerings of the Class A Common Stock, the TEUs and the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015.
On May 4, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $12.0 million of additional 10.625%
Senior Secured Notes due 2016 resulting in net proceeds of approximately $11.6 million. On June 3, 2011, we used these
net proceeds together with cash on hand, to fund the redemption of the remaining outstanding principal amount ($0.5
million) of our 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and the remaining outstanding principal amount ($11.7 million) of
our 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017. These transactions, along with the tender offers and redemptions in February
2011 and March 2011 discussed above, resulted in a loss of $3.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2011. The
losses from the transactions are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment
of debt.”
On November 1, 2011, we issued $141.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due
2021 (the “5.0% 2021 Notes”) and $53.2 million aggregate principal amount of 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the
“2.0% 2021 Notes”, and together with the 5.0% 2021 Notes the “2021 Notes”) in exchange for $195.0 million of certain of
29
our unsecured senior notes with maturities ranging from 2014 through 2017. Holders of the senior notes due 2014 and 2015
that were exchanged in the exchange offer also received an aggregate of approximately $14.2 million in cash payments and
all holders of senior notes that were exchanged in the exchange offer received accrued and unpaid interest (in the aggregate
amount of approximately $3.3 million). Costs associated with this transaction were $4.7 million. The 5.0% 2021 Notes and
the 2.0% 2021 Notes were issued as separate series under an indenture, but have substantially the same terms other than
with respect to interest rate and related redemption provisions, and vote together as a single class. Due to the then-existing
financial condition of K. Hovnanian as determined in accordance with ASC 470-60, “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors
for Troubled Debt Restructurings” and because the holders of the senior notes that exchanged such notes for 2021 Notes
granted K. Hovnanian a concession in the form of extended maturities and reduced interest rates, the accounting for the
debt exchange was treated as a troubled debt restructuring. Under this accounting, the Company did not recognize any gain
or loss on extinguishment of debt and the costs associated with the debt exchange were expensed as incurred as shown
in “Other operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for
further discussion.
The guarantees by K. Hovnanian JV Holdings, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries, except for certain joint ventures and
joint venture holding companies (collectively, the “Secured Group”) with respect to the 2021 Notes are secured, subject to
permitted liens and other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the members of the Secured
Group. As of October 31, 2013, the collateral securing the guarantees included (1) $72.9 million of cash and cash
equivalents (subsequent to such date, cash uses include general business operations and real estate and other investments);
(2) approximately $74.4 million aggregate book value of real property of the Secured Group, which does not include the
impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were
appraised, and (3) equity interests in guarantors that are members of the Secured Group. Members of the Secured Group
also own equity in joint ventures, either directly or indirectly through ownership of joint venture holding companies, with a
book value of $44.1 million as of October 31, 2013; this equity is not pledged to secure, and is not collateral for, the 2021
Notes. Members of the Secured Group are “unrestricted subsidiaries” under K. Hovnanian's other senior notes, senior
secured notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes, and thus have not guaranteed such indebtedness.
On October 2, 2012, K. Hovnanian issued $577.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% senior secured first
lien notes due 2020 (the "First Lien Notes") and $220.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% senior secured
second lien notes due 2020 (the "Second Lien Notes" and, together with the First Lien Notes, the "2020 Secured Notes") in
a private placement (the "2020 Secured Notes Offering"). The net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering, together
with the net proceeds of the Units offering discussed below, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and
consent solicitation with respect to the Company’s then-outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and the
redemption of the remaining notes that were not purchased in the tender offer as described below.
The First Lien Notes are secured by a first-priority lien and the Second Lien Notes are secured by a second-
priority lien, in each case, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, on substantially all the assets owned by us, K.
Hovnanian and the guarantors of such notes. At October 31, 2013, the aggregate book value of the real property that
constituted collateral securing the 2020 Secured Notes was approximately $526.0 million, which does not include the
impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were
appraised. In addition, cash collateral that secured the 2020 Secured Notes was $251.5 million as of October 31, 2013,
which included $5.2 million of restricted cash collateralizing certain letters of credit. Subsequent to such date, cash uses
include general business operations and real estate and other investments.
The First Lien Notes are redeemable in whole or in part, at our option at any time prior to October 15, 2015 at
100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of the First
Lien Notes at 105.438% of principal commencing October 15, 2015, at 103.625% of principal commencing October 15,
2016, at 101.813% of principal commencing October 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing October 15, 2018. In
addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes prior to October 15, 2015
with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 107.25% of principal.
The Second Lien Notes are redeemable in whole, or in part, at our option at any time prior to November 15, 2015
at 100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of the
Second Lien Notes at 106.844% of principal commencing November 15, 2015, at 104.563% of principal commencing
November 15, 2016, at 102.281% of principal commencing November 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing
November 15, 2018. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes
prior to November 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 109.125% of principal.
30
Also on October 2, 2012, the Company and K. Hovnanian issued $100,000,000 aggregate stated amount of 6.0%
Exchangeable Note Units (the “Units”) (equivalent to 100,000 Units). Each $1,000 stated amount of Units initially consists
of (1) a zero coupon Senior Exchangeable note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Exchangeable Note”) issued by K.
Hovnanian, which bears no cash interest and has an initial principal amount of $768.51 per Senior Exchangeable Note, and
that will accrete to $1,000 at maturity and (2) a Senior Amortizing note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Amortizing
Note”) issued by K. Hovnanian, which has an initial principal amount of $231.49 per Senior Amortizing Note, bears
interest at a rate of 11.0% per annum, and has a final installment payment date on December 1, 2017. Each Unit may be
separated into its constituent Senior Exchangeable Note and Senior Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the
Units, and the separate components may be combined to create a Unit.
Each Senior Exchangeable Note had an initial principal amount of $768.51 (which will accrete to $1,000 over the
term of the Exchangeable Note at an annual rate of 5.17% from the date of issuance, calculated on a semi-annual bond
equivalent yield basis). Holders may exchange their Senior Exchangeable Notes at their option at any time prior to 5p.m.,
New York City time, on the business day immediately preceding December 1, 2017. Each Senior Exchangeable Note will
be exchangeable for shares of Class A Common Stock at an initial exchange rate of 185.5288 shares of Class A Common
Stock per Senior Exchangeable Note (equivalent to an initial exchange price, based on $1,000 principal amount at maturity,
of approximately $5.39 per share of Class A Common Stock). The exchange rate will be subject to adjustment in certain
events. If certain corporate events occur prior to the maturity date, the Company will increase the applicable exchange rate
for any holder who elects to exchange its Senior Exchangeable Notes in connection with such corporate event. In addition,
holders of Senior Exchangeable Notes will also have the right to require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior
Exchangeable Notes upon the occurrence of certain of these corporate events. As of October 31, 2013, 18,305 Senior
Exchangeable Notes have been converted into 3.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock, all of which were
converted during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
On each June 1 and December 1 (each, an “installment payment date”) K. Hovnanian will pay holders of Senior
Amortizing Notes equal semi-annual cash installments of $30.00 per Senior Amortizing Note (except for the June 1, 2013
installment payment, which was $39.83 per Senior Amortizing Note), which cash payment in the aggregate will be
equivalent to 6.0% per year with respect to each $1,000 stated amount of Units. Each installment will constitute a payment
of interest (at a rate of 11.0% per annum) and a partial repayment of principal on the Senior Amortizing Note. Following
certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, holders of the Senior Amortizing Notes will have the right to
require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Amortizing Notes.
The net proceeds of the Units offering, along with the net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering
previously discussed, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to the
Company’s then outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and redemption of the remaining notes that were not
purchased in the tender offer as described below.
On October 2, 2012, pursuant to a cash tender offer and consent solicitation, we purchased in a fixed-price tender
offer approximately $637.2 million aggregate principal amount of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 for
approximately $691.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequently, all 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016
that were not tendered in the tender offer (approximately $159.8 million) were redeemed for an aggregate redemption price
of approximately $181.8 million. The tender offer and redemption resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87.0
million, including the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The loss is included in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”
During the year ended October 31, 2012, we repurchased for cash in the open market and privately negotiated
transactions $21.0 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $61.1 million principal amount of our
7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $37.4 million principal amount of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017, and $2.0 million
principal amount of our 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The aggregate purchase price for these repurchases was $72.2
million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $48.4 million
for the year ended October 31, 2012, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The gain is included in the
consolidated statement of operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.” Certain of these repurchases were funded
with the proceeds from our April 11, 2012 issuance of 25,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock (see Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).
In addition, during the year ended October 31, 2012, pursuant to agreements with bondholders we exchanged $7.8
million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $4.0 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due
2016 and $18.3 million of our outstanding 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 for shares of our Class A Common Stock, as
discussed in Notes 9 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. These transactions were treated as a substantial
31
modification of debt, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The
gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”
On September 16, 2013, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $41.6 million of its 6.25% Senior
Notes due 2016. The Notes were issued as additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 under the indenture dated as of August
8, 2005. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund the redemption on October 15, 2013 of all of K.
Hovnanian’s outstanding 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay related fees and
expenses.
As of October 31, 2013, we had $992.0 million of outstanding senior secured notes ($978.6 million, net of
discount), comprised of $577.0 million 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020 (the “First Lien Notes”), $220.0
million 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020 (the “Second Lien Notes” and, together with the First Lien
Notes, the “2020 Secured Notes”), $53.2 million 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “2.0% 2021 Notes”) and $141.8
million 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “5.0% 2021 Notes” and together with the 2.0% 2021 Notes, the “2021
Notes”). As of October 31, 2013, we also had $462.6 million of outstanding senior notes ($461.2 million, net of discount),
comprised of $21.4 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2015, $172.7 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $86.5 million
7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $121.0 million 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 and $60.8 million 11.875% Senior Notes due
2015. In addition, as of October 31, 2013, we had outstanding $20.9 million 11.0% Senior Amortizing Notes due 2017
(issued as a component of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units), $66.6 million Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2017 (issued
as a component of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units) and $2.2 million 7.25% Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes
(issued as a component of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units). Except for K. Hovnanian, the issuer of the notes, our home
mortgage subsidiaries, joint ventures and subsidiaries holding interests in our joint ventures, certain of our title insurance
subsidiaries and our foreign subsidiary, we and each of our subsidiaries are guarantors of the senior secured, senior, senior
amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes outstanding at October 31, 2013 (see Note 23 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements). In addition, the 2021 Notes are guaranteed by the Secured Group. Members of the
Secured Group do not guarantee K. Hovnanian's other indebtedness.
The indentures governing the notes do not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but do contain restrictive
covenants that limit, among other things, the Company’s ability and that of certain of its subsidiaries, including K.
Hovnanian, to incur additional indebtedness (other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing indebtedness and non-
recourse indebtedness), pay dividends and make distributions on common and preferred stock, repurchase subordinated
indebtedness with (respect to certain of the senior secured notes), make other restricted payments, make investments, sell
certain assets, incur liens, consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all assets and enter into
certain transactions with affiliates. The indentures also contain events of default which would permit the holders of the
notes to declare the notes to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the
failure to make timely payments on the notes or other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and
covenants and specified events of bankruptcy, and insolvency and, with respect to the indentures governing the senior
secured notes, the failure of the documents granting security for the senior secured notes to be in full force and effect and
the failure of the liens on any material portion of the collateral securing the senior secured notes to be valid and perfected.
As of October 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants of the indentures governing our outstanding
notes.
Under the terms of the indentures, we have the right to make certain redemptions and, depending on market
conditions and covenant restrictions, may do so from time to time. We also continue to evaluate our capital structure and
may also continue to make debt purchases and/or exchanges for debt or equity from time to time through tender offers,
open market purchases, private transactions, or otherwise, or seek to raise additional debt or equity capital, depending on
market conditions and covenant restrictions.
If our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the indentures governing our senior secured and
senior notes (other than the senior exchangeable notes) is less than 2.0 to 1.0, we are restricted from making certain
payments, including dividends, and from incurring indebtedness other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing
indebtedness, and non-recourse indebtedness. As a result of this restriction, we are currently restricted from paying
dividends, which are not cumulative, on our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. We anticipate we will continue to be
restricted from paying dividends for the foreseeable future. Our inability to pay dividends is in accordance with covenant
restrictions and will not result in a default under our debt instruments or otherwise affect compliance with any of the
covenants contained in the debt instruments.
In June 2013, K. Hovnanian, as borrower, and we and certain of our subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a
five-year $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative
32
agent and issuing bank, and Citibank, N.A., as a lender. The Credit Facility is available for both letters of credit and general
corporate purposes. The Credit Facility does not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but does contain certain
restrictive covenants that track those contained in our indenture governing the First Lien Notes, which are described
above. The Credit Facility also contains certain customary events of default which would permit the administrative agent at
the request of the required lenders to, among other things, declare all loans then outstanding to be immediately due and
payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the failure to make timely payments of amounts payable
under the Credit Facility or other material indebtedness or the acceleration of other material indebtedness, the failure to
comply with agreements and covenants or for representations or warranties to be correct in all material respects when
made, specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency, and the entry of a material judgment against a loan
party. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility accrue interest at an annual rate equal to either, as selected by K.
Hovnanian, (i) the alternate base rate plus the applicable spread determined on the date of such borrowing or (ii) an
adjusted LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread determined as of the date two business days prior to the first day of the
interest period for such borrowing. As of October 31, 2013, there were no borrowings and $25.8 million of letters of credit
outstanding under the Credit Facility and as of such date, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the
Credit Facility.
In addition to the Credit Facility, we have certain stand alone cash collateralized letter of credit agreements and
facilities under which there were a total of $5.1 million and $29.5 million of letters of credit outstanding as of October 31,
2013 and 2012, respectively. These agreements and facilities require us to maintain specified amounts of cash as collateral
in segregated accounts to support the letters of credit issued thereunder, which will affect the amount of cash we have
available for other uses. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount of cash collateral in these segregated accounts was
$5.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, which is reflected in “Restricted cash and cash equivalents” on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiary, K. Hovnanian American Mortgage, LLC (“K. Hovnanian
Mortgage”), originates mortgage loans primarily from the sale of our homes. Such mortgage loans and related servicing
rights are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time. In certain instances, we retain the servicing
rights for a small amount of loans. Our secured Master Repurchase Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase
Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on June 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to June 27, 2014, is a
short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages held
for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly on
outstanding advances at an adjusted LIBOR rate, which was 0.168% at October 31, 2013, subject to a floor of 1%, plus the
applicable margin of 2.5%. Therefore, at October 31, 2013, the interest rate was 3.5%. As of October 31, 2013, the
aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Chase Master Repurchase Agreement was $33.6
million.
K. Hovnanian Mortgage has another secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Customers Bank (“Customers
Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on May 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to May 27, 2014, that is
a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $37.5 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages
held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable daily or
as loans are sold to permanent investors on outstanding advances at the current LIBOR subject to a floor of 0.5% plus the
applicable margin ranging from 3.0% to 5.5% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013, the
aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Customers Master Repurchase Agreement was $30.7
million.
K. Hovnanian Mortgage has a third secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Credit Suisse First Boston
Mortgage Capital LLC (“Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on January 2, 2013, that is a
short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through June 20, 2014. The loan is secured by the mortgages
held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly
on outstanding advances at the Credit Suisse Cost of Funds, which was 0.48% at October 31, 2013, plus the applicable
margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.0% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013, the aggregate
principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement was $27.4 million.
The Chase Master Repurchase Agreement, Customers Master Repurchase Agreement and Credit Suisse Master
Repurchase Agreement (together, the “Master Repurchase Agreements”) require K. Hovnanian Mortgage to satisfy and
maintain specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests. Because of the extremely short period of time
mortgages are held by K. Hovnanian Mortgage before the mortgages are sold to investors (generally a period of a few
weeks), the immateriality to us on a consolidated basis of the size of the Master Repurchase Agreements, the levels
required by these financial covenants, our ability based on our immediately available resources to contribute sufficient
33
capital to cure any default, were such conditions to occur, and our right to cure any conditions of default based on the terms
of the agreement, we do not consider any of these covenants to be substantive or material. As of October 31, 2013, we
believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Master Repurchase Agreements.
Total inventory, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased $87.1 million during the year ended
October 31, 2013. Total inventory, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased in the Mid-Atlantic by $39.4
million, in the Midwest $25.0 million, in the Southeast by $12.6 million and in the Southwest by $59.2 million. This
increase was partially offset by decreases in the Northeast of $46.4 million and in the West of $2.7 million. The increases
were primarily attributable to new land purchases and land development during fiscal 2013, offset by home deliveries. The
decreases in the Northeast and West during fiscal 2013 were due to delivering homes at a faster pace than purchasing new
land to replenish our inventory. During fiscal 2013, we incurred $2.4 million in impairments, primarily in the Northeast. In
addition, we wrote-off costs in the amount of $2.6 million during fiscal 2013 related to land options that expired or that we
terminated, as the communities’ forecasted profitability was not projected to produce adequate returns on investment
commensurate with the risk. In the last few years, we have been able to acquire new land parcels at prices that we believe
will generate reasonable returns under current homebuilding market conditions. There can be no assurances that this trend
will continue in the near term. Substantially all homes under construction or completed and included in inventory at
October 31, 2013 are expected to be closed during the next 12 months.
The total inventory increase discussed above excluded the increase in consolidated inventory not owned of $10.2
million. Consolidated inventory not owned consists of specific performance options and other options that were added to
our balance sheet in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The increase from
October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013, was primarily due to sale and leaseback of certain model homes and land banking
transactions during fiscal 2013. During fiscal 2012 and 2013, we sold and leased back certain of our model homes with the
right to participate in the potential profit when each home is sold to a third party at the end of the respective lease. As a
result of our continued involvement for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, these sale and
leaseback transactions are considered a financing rather than a sale for accounting purposes. Therefore, for purposes of our
Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $47.6 million was recorded to “Consolidated inventory not
owned - other options”, with a corresponding amount of $45.7 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”.
In addition, we entered into a land banking arrangement in fiscal 2012 with GSO Capital Partners LP (“GSO”) that
continued in fiscal 2013 whereby we sold a portfolio of our land parcels to GSO, and GSO provided us an option to
purchase back finished lots on a quarterly basis. Because of our option to repurchase these parcels, for accounting purposes
in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, this transaction is considered a financing rather than a sale. For purposes of our
Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $52.4 million was recorded to “Consolidated inventory not
owned - other options”, with a corresponding amount of $41.4 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”
for the amount of net cash received from the transactions. From time to time we enter into option agreements that include
specific performance requirements, whereby we are required to purchase a minimum number of lots. Because of our
obligation to purchase these lots, for accounting purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, we are required to record
this inventory on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of October 31, 2013, we had $0.8 million of specific performance
options recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Consolidated inventory not owned - specific performance
options”, with a corresponding amount recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”.
When possible, we option property for development prior to acquisition. By optioning property, we are only
subject to the loss of the cost of the option and predevelopment costs if we choose not to exercise the option (other than
with respect to specific performance options discussed above). As a result, our commitment for major land acquisitions is
reduced. The costs associated with optioned properties are included in “Land and land options held for future development
or sale inventory”. Also included in "Land and land options held for future development or sale inventory" are amounts
associated with inventory in mothballed communities. We mothball (or stop development on) certain communities when
we determine the current performance does not justify further investment at the time. That is, we believe we will generate
higher returns if we decide against spending money to improve land today and save the raw land until such times as the
markets improve or we determine to sell the property. As of October 31, 2013, we have mothballed land in 50
communities. The book value associated with these communities at October 31, 2013 was $115.9 million, net of
impairment charges recorded in prior periods of $431.6 million. We continually review communities to determine if
mothballing is appropriate. During fiscal 2013, we mothballed one community, re-activated three previously mothballed
communities and sold one mothballed community. Our inventory representing “Land and land options held for future
development or sale” at October 31, 2013, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, increased by $6.2 million compared to
October 31, 2012. The increase was primarily due to the acquisition of new land in all segments during fiscal 2013, offset
by the movement of certain of our communities from held for future development to sold and unsold homes and lots under
development during the period, combined with land sales in the Northeast and Southwest.
34
Inventories held for sale, which are land parcels where we have decided not to build homes, represented $2.7
million of our total inventories at October 31, 2013, and are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs
to sell. In determining fair value for land held for sale, management considers, among other things, prices for land in recent
comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the
land (other than in a forced liquidation sale) and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties.
The following tables summarize home sites included in our total residential real estate. The increase in total home
sites available at October 31, 2013 compared to October 31, 2012 is attributable to signing new land option agreements and
acquiring new land parcels, offset by terminating certain option agreements and delivering homes.
Total
Home
Contracted
Not
Sites
Delivered
Remaining
Home
Sites
Available
4,768
5,598
4,792
3,835
7,060
6,044
32,097
2,613
34,710
16,326
15,523
248
32,097
2,613
34,710
4,363
5,878
3,204
2,179
5,753
6,642
28,019
1,774
29,793
16,427
11,418
174
28,019
1,774
29,793
220
271
605
308
677
86
2,167
225
2,392
1,645
274
248
2,167
225
2,392
264
266
427
235
506
191
1,889
256
2,145
1,499
216
174
1,889
256
2,145
4,548
5,327
4,187
3,527
6,383
5,958
29,930
2,388
32,318
14,681
15,249
-
29,930
2,388
32,318
4,099
5,612
2,777
1,944
5,247
6,451
26,130
1,518
27,648
14,928
11,202
-
26,130
1,518
27,648
October 31, 2013:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Unconsolidated joint ventures
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures
Owned
Optioned
Construction to permanent financing lots
Consolidated total
Lots controlled by unconsolidated joint ventures
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures
October 31, 2012:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Unconsolidated joint ventures
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures
Owned
Optioned
Construction to permanent financing lots
Consolidated total
Lots controlled by unconsolidated joint ventures
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures
35
The following table summarizes our started or completed unsold homes and models, excluding unconsolidated
joint ventures, in active and substantially completed communities. Started or completed unsold homes decreased in total,
and on a per active selling community basis, from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013, primarily due to increased sales
pace in many of our homebuilding markets. Model homes decreased in total from October 31, 2012 to October 31, 2013,
primarily due to model homes that were sold to a third party in sales lease-back transactions during fiscal 2013.
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
Started or completed unsold
homes and models per active
selling communities(1)
October 31, 2013
Unsold
Homes Models
14
9
8
9
13
8
61
95
78
17
57
346
40
633
October 31, 2012
Unsold
Homes Models
9
7
22
10
19
6
73
116
65
19
55
355
39
649
Total
109
87
25
66
359
48
694
Total
125
72
41
65
374
45
722
3.3
0.3
3.6
3.8
0.4
4.2
(1) Active selling communities (which are communities that are open for sale with 10 or more home sites available) were
192 and 172 at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Ratio does not include substantially completed communities,
which are communities with less than 10 home sites available.
Homebuilding restricted cash and cash equivalents decreased $31.4 million to $10.3 million at October 31, 2013
compared to October 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily related to the release of cash securitizing letters of credit as we
transitioned from having letters of credit issued under our letter of credit agreements and facilities that required cash
collateral to having letters of credit issued under our new Credit Facility that does not require any cash collateral. Also
contributing to the decrease was a reduction in our surety bond escrow cash requirements during fiscal 2013.
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures decreased $9.6 million during the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to reduced advances at October 31, 2013 as compared to October 31,
2012. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase related to the investment in two new homebuilding joint ventures
during fiscal 2013. As of October 31, 2013, we had investments in seven homebuilding joint ventures and one land
development joint venture. We have no guarantees associated with our unconsolidated joint ventures, other than guarantees
limited only to performance and completion of development, environmental indemnification and standard warranty and
representation against fraud misrepresentation and similar actions, including a voluntary bankruptcy.
Receivables, deposits and notes decreased $16.7 million from October 31, 2012 to $45.1 million at October 31,
2013. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in receivables for home closings as a result of cash in transit from
various title companies at the end of the respective periods. In addition, although we received reimbursements from our
insurance carriers for certain warranty claims, we also increased our allowance for doubtful accounts related to certain
other of our insurance receivables and other note receivables.
Property, plant and equipment decreased $2.3 million during the year ended October 31, 2013 primarily due to
depreciation and a small amount of disposals, which were offset by minor additions for leasehold improvements during the
period.
Prepaid expenses and other assets were as follows as of:
(In thousands)
Prepaid insurance
Prepaid project costs
Net rental properties
Other prepaids
Other assets
Total
October 31,
October 31,
2013
$3,213
23,841
1,975
30,055
267
$59,351
2012
$1,729
24,008
5,430
26,086
9,441
$66,694
Dollar
Change
$1,484
(167)
(3,455)
3,969
(9,174)
$(7,343)
36
Prepaid insurance increased due to premium payments made on certain liability insurance policies during fiscal
2013. These costs are amortized over the life of the associated insurance policy, which can be one to three years. Prepaid
project costs consist of community specific expenditures that are used over the life of the community. Such prepaids are
expensed as homes are delivered. Net rental properties decreased primarily due to the sale of our last senior residential
rental property during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. The remaining balance of net rental properties represents leasehold
improvements for an office building that we fully sub-lease. Other prepaids increased primarily as a result of fees paid in
connection with our new Credit Facility entered into during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, along with prepaid payroll
taxes related to the timing of the Company’s payroll at October 31, 2013. Other assets decreased mainly due to the sale of
Company-owned life insurance policies to a third party during fiscal 2013 for approximately book value.
Financial Services - Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of residential mortgages receivable held for
sale, of which $109.7 million and $115.0 million at October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, respectively, were being
temporarily warehoused and are awaiting sale in the secondary mortgage market. The decrease in mortgage loans held for
sale from October 31, 2012 was primarily related to the timing of loans closed during fourth quarter of fiscal 2013
compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.
Financial Services – Other assets decreased $6.0 million to $4.3 million at October 31, 2013 compared to October
31, 2012. The decrease is related to the closing of mortgages in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, which were funded in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, in anticipation of home closings on the last days of October 2012 that did not occur until early
November, due to weather-related delays from Hurricane Sandy.
Nonrecourse mortgages were $62.9 million at October 31, 2013 and $38.3 million at October 31, 2012. The
increase was primarily due to new mortgages for communities in the Northeast, the Mid-Atlantic, the Midwest, the
Southwest and the West obtained during fiscal 2013, along with increased borrowings on certain of our existing non-
recourse mortgages. Offsetting the increase was a decrease related to a property in the Mid-Atlantic, which we had
previously acquired when our partner in a land development joint venture transferred its interest in the venture to us, that
was foreclosed on in fiscal 2013. As a result, the non-recourse liability of $9.5 million and corresponding inventory balance
were taken off our balance sheet for the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Also offsetting the increase during the period were
principal payments made on certain of our existing non-recourse mortgages.
Accounts payable and other liabilities are as follows as of:
(In thousands)
Accounts payable
Reserves
Accrued expenses
Accrued compensation
Other liabilities
Total
October 31,
October 31,
2013
$98,585
136,029
26,454
39,704
6,992
$307,764
2012
$89,310
129,025
29,969
26,625
21,581
$296,510
Dollar
Change
$9,275
7,004
(3,515)
13,079
(14,589)
$11,254
The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to the higher volume of deliveries in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2013 compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, along with a change in the scheduled timing of certain of our
monthly payments. Reserves increased during the period as new accruals for general liability insurance exceeded payments
for warranty related claims. The decrease in accrued expenses is primarily due to decreases in property tax accruals and
amortization of abandoned lease space accruals. The increase in accrued compensation is primarily due to increased bonus
accruals as profitability increased in many of our markets, as well as for the consolidated Company, in fiscal 2013. Other
liabilities decreased primarily due to installment payments made to a former joint venture partner for the buy-out of their
share of the joint venture during fiscal 2012.
Customer deposits increased to $30.1 million at October 31, 2013 from $23.8 million at October 31, 2012. This
increase is primarily attributable to the increase in backlog as of October 31, 2013.
Liabilities from inventory not owned increased $10.1 million to $87.9 million at October 31, 2013 from $77.8
million at October 31, 2012. The increase is primarily due to the model home and land banking programs described above
with the change in inventory not owned discussion.
37
Financial Services - Accounts payable and other liabilities decreased $4.7 million to $32.9 million at October 31,
2013. The decrease primarily related to the decrease in restricted cash in our title company during the period, due to a
decrease in the volume and timing of home closings during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 compared to the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2012.
Financial Services - Mortgage warehouse lines of credit decreased $15.8 million from $107.5 million at October
31, 2012, to $91.7 million at October 31, 2013. The decrease correlates to the decrease in the volume of mortgage loans
held for sale during the period, along with the decrease in financial services other assets, discussed above.
Accrued interest increased $8.1 million to $28.3 million at October 31, 2013 as compared to October 31, 2012.
This increase is due to the timing of semi-annual interest payments on our bonds.
Income taxes payable of $6.9 million at October 31, 2012 decreased $3.6 million during the year ended October
31, 2013 to $3.3 million primarily due to the release of reserves for a federal tax position that was settled with the Internal
Revenue Service during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, offset by state tax expense.
Results of Operations
Total Revenues
Compared to the prior period, revenues increased (decreased) as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Homebuilding:
Sale of homes
Land sales
Other revenues
Financial services
Total change
Total revenues percent change
Homebuilding
October 31,
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$378,747
(14,077)
(7,762)
8,992
$365,900
24.6%
$333,106
5,043
3,043
9,254
$350,446
30.9%
$(255,025)
19,925
657
(2,492)
$(236,935)
(17.3)%
Sale of homes revenues increased $378.7 million, or 26.9%, for the year ended October 31, 2013, increased
$333.1 million, or 31.1%, for the year ended October 31, 2012 and decreased $255.0 million, or 19.2%, for the year ended
October 31, 2011. The increased revenues in fiscal 2013 were primarily due to the number of home deliveries increasing
12.6% and the average price per home increasing to $338,839 from $300,595 in fiscal 2012. The increased revenues in
fiscal 2012 were primarily due to the number of home deliveries increasing 22.0% and the average price per home
increasing to $300,595 from $279,873 in 2011. The decreased revenues in fiscal 2011 were primarily due to the number of
home deliveries declining 19.0% and the decrease in average price per home. The fluctuations in average prices were a
result of the geographic and community mix of our deliveries, as well as price increases in certain of our individual
communities. During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we were able to raise prices in a number of our communities. For information
on land sales, see the section titled “Land Sales and Other Revenues” below.
38
Information on homes delivered by segment is set forth below:
(Housing Revenue in thousands)
Northeast:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Mid-Atlantic:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Midwest:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Southeast:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Southwest:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
West:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Consolidated total:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Unconsolidated joint ventures:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Total including unconsolidated joint ventures:
Housing revenues
Homes delivered
Average price
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
October 31,
2011
$279,695
617
$453,314
$288,323
623
$462,798
$162,758
657
$247,730
$146,264
535
$273,391
$684,258
2,331
$293,547
$223,029
503
$443,398
$218,396
505
$432,467
$268,880
649
$414,299
$106,539
477
$223,352
$113,347
482
$235,160
$515,757
2,003
$257,492
$182,661
560
$326,180
$179,866
399
$450,792
$199,061
524
$379,887
$70,465
360
$195,736
$79,146
339
$233,469
$418,631
1,726
$242,544
$125,305
484
$258,895
$1,784,327
5,266
$338,839
$1,405,580
4,676
$300,595
$1,072,474
3,832
$279,873
$306,174
664
$461,105
$320,657
680
$471,554
$172,343
384
$448,810
$2,090,501
5,930
$352,530
$1,726,237
5,356
$322,300
$1,244,817
4,216
$295,260
The increase in housing revenues and deliveries during year ended October 31, 2013, as compared to year ended
October 31, 2012, was primarily attributed to market improvements demonstrated by an increase in sales pace per
community from 28.1 to 30.7 for fiscal 2012 and 2013, respectively. Housing revenues and average sales prices in 2013
increased in all of our homebuilding segments combined by 26.9% and 12.7%, respectively. In our homebuilding segments,
homes delivered increased in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 by 22.2%, 37.7%, 11.0%, and 16.4%, in the Northeast,
Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest, respectively, and decreased by 4.0% and 10.2% in the Mid-Atlantic and West,
respectively.
The increase in housing revenues and deliveries during the year ended October 31, 2012, as compared to year
ended October 31, 2011, was primarily attributed to market improvements demonstrated by an increase in sales pace per
community from 21.3 to 28.1 for fiscal 2011 and 2012, respectively. Housing revenues and average sales prices in 2012
increased in all of our homebuilding segments combined by 31.1% and 7.4%, respectively. In our homebuilding segments,
homes delivered increased in fiscal 2012 as compared to fiscal 2011 by 26.6%, 23.9%, 32.5%, 42.2%, 16.0% and 15.7% in
the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest and West, respectively.
39
Quarterly housing revenues and net sales contracts by segment, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, for the
years ending October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth below:
(In thousands)
Housing revenues:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Sales contracts (net of cancellations):
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
(In thousands)
Housing revenues:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Sales contracts (net of cancellations):
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Quarter Ended
October 31,
July 31,
April 30,
2013
2013
2013
January 31,
2013
$105,914
89,048
53,313
45,276
220,948
63,595
$578,094
$68,499
71,797
59,808
42,901
149,594
50,747
$443,346
$66,447
89,123
37,918
35,265
181,593
52,030
$462,376
$69,118
79,104
57,066
54,581
195,403
39,322
$494,594
$53,099
57,706
39,356
37,119
160,988
61,308
$409,576
$86,311
89,896
60,898
51,479
235,517
55,461
$579,562
Quarter Ended
$54,234
52,447
32,172
28,605
120,728
46,095
$334,281
$45,356
69,922
39,988
33,263
159,269
49,148
$396,946
October 31,
July 31,
April 30,
2012
2012
2012
January 31,
2012
$71,675
76,259
36,579
47,328
170,913
66,521
$469,275
$68,779
63,208
40,446
43,624
153,700
71,108
$440,865
$63,811
75,075
28,213
24,432
139,407
40,543
$371,481
$54,575
55,399
43,100
38,562
166,120
65,640
$423,396
$49,834
64,432
23,590
21,462
114,284
38,892
$312,494
$54,887
82,121
45,431
39,305
166,529
61,670
$449,943
$33,077
53,113
18,157
20,125
91,153
36,705
$252,330
$28,198
49,622
28,408
24,471
103,860
30,206
$264,765
40
(In thousands)
Housing revenues:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Sales contracts (net of cancellations):
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Consolidated total
Quarter Ended
October 31,
July 31,
April 30,
2011
2011
2011
January 31,
2011
$57,014
49,050
21,249
29,064
126,204
30,555
$313,136
$40,014
56,269
20,863
20,775
101,549
38,953
$278,423
$43,443
57,104
17,716
17,894
107,861
32,461
$276,479
$56,427
73,986
21,273
28,301
113,370
38,950
$332,307
$36,126
46,643
17,466
16,684
97,339
32,716
$246,974
$57,394
55,874
20,521
23,345
104,010
32,423
$293,567
$43,284
46,263
14,034
15,504
87,227
29,573
$235,885
$37,435
52,013
12,331
15,640
85,787
22,282
$225,488
Contracts per average active selling community in fiscal 2013 were 30.7 compared to fiscal 2012 of 28.1. Our
reported level of sales contracts (net of cancellations) has been impacted by the increase in the pace of sales in all of the
Company’s segments, due to improved market conditions and lower interest rates on mortgages during fiscal
2013. Cancellation rates represent the number of cancelled contracts in the quarter divided by the number of gross sales
contracts executed in the quarter. For comparison, the following are historical cancellation rates, excluding unconsolidated
joint ventures.
Quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
2013
16 %
15%
17%
23%
2012
21%
16%
20%
23%
2011
22%
20%
18%
21%
2010
21 %
17 %
23 %
24 %
2009
31%
24%
23%
24%
Another common and meaningful way to analyze our cancellation trends is to compare the number of contract
cancellations as a percentage of the beginning backlog. The following table provides this historical comparison, excluding
unconsolidated joint ventures.
Quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
2013
12%
15%
12%
14%
2012
18%
21%
18%
18%
2011
18%
22%
20%
18%
2010
13 %
17 %
15 %
25 %
2009
22%
31%
23%
20%
Historically, most cancellations occur within the legal rescission period, which varies by state but is generally less
than two weeks after the signing of the contract. Cancellations also occur as a result of a buyer's failure to qualify for a
mortgage, which generally occurs during the first few weeks after signing. However, beginning in fiscal 2007 and
continuing through fiscal 2009, we started experiencing higher than normal numbers of cancellations later in the
construction process. These cancellations were related primarily to falling prices, sometimes due to new discounts offered
by us and other builders, leading the buyer to lose confidence in their contract price and due to tighter mortgage
underwriting criteria leading to some customers’ inability to be approved for a mortgage loan. In some cases, the buyer will
walk away from a significant nonrefundable deposit that we recognize as other revenues. Our cancellations as a percentage
of beginning backlog for fiscal 2013 were lower than what we believe to be normalized levels for the fourth quarter of
2013. Our cancellation rate based on gross sales contracts for fiscal 2013 was more typical of what we believe to be more
normalized levels, except for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, which increased in conjunction with the slowdown in sales
during August and September 2013. However, in October and November 2013, sales returned to prior year levels. It is
difficult to predict what cancellation rates will be in the future.
41
An important indicator of our future results is recently signed contracts and our home contract backlog for future
deliveries. Our consolidated contract backlog, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, by segment is set forth below:
(Dollars In thousands)
Northeast:
Total contract backlog
Number of homes
Mid-Atlantic:
Total contract backlog
Number of homes
Midwest:
Total contract backlog
Number of homes
Southeast:
Total contract backlog
Number of homes
Southwest:
Total contract backlog
Number of homes
West:
Total contract backlog
Number of homes
Totals:
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
October 31,
2011
$105,006
220
$115,416
264
$108,645
265
$141,168
271
$118,773
266
$137,303
325
$150,716
605
$98,656
308
$95,716
427
$62,696
235
$216,367
677
$160,840
506
$50,526
86
$78,877
191
$44,870
226
$30,080
124
$86,388
331
$32,914
116
Total consolidated contract backlog
Number of homes
$762,439
2,167
$632,318
1,889
$440,200
1,387
Our net contracts for the full years of fiscal 2013 and 2012, excluding unconsolidated joint ventures, increased
7.9% and increased 27.7%, respectively, as compared to the prior fiscal year. In the month of November 2013, excluding
unconsolidated joint ventures, we signed an additional 345 net contracts amounting to $133.5 million in contract value.
Total cost of sales on our Consolidated Statements of Operations includes expenses for consolidated housing and
land and lot sales, including inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs (defined as “land charges” in the tables
below). A breakout of such expenses for housing sales and housing gross margin is set forth below:
(Dollars In thousands)
Sale of homes
Cost of sales, net of impairment reversals and excluding interest
October 31,
2013
$1,784,327
Year Ended
October 31,
2012
$1,405,580
October 31,
2011
$1,072,474
expense
1,426,032
1,155,643
905,253
Homebuilding gross margin, before cost of sales interest expense
and land charges
Cost of sales interest expense, excluding land sales interest expense
Homebuilding gross margin, after cost of sales interest expense,
before land charges
Land charges
Homebuilding gross margin, after cost of sales interest expense and
358,295
51,939
249,937
48,843
306,356
4,965
201,094
12,530
167,221
57,016
110,205
101,749
land charges
$301,391
$188,564
$8,456
Gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and
land charges
Gross margin percentage, after cost of sales interest expense, before
land charges
Gross margin percentage after cost of sales interest expense and
land charges
20.1%
17.2%
16.9%
17.8%
14.3%
13.4%
15.6%
10.3%
0.8%
42
Cost of sales expenses as a percentage of consolidated home sales revenues are presented below:
Sale of homes
Cost of sales, net of impairment reversals and excluding interest:
Housing, land and development costs
Commissions
Financing concessions
Overheads
Total cost of sales, before interest expense and land charges
Gross margin percentage, before cost of sales interest expense and
land charges
Cost of sales interest
Gross margin percentage, after cost of sales interest expense and
before land charges
October 31,
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
100%
70.0%
3.3%
1.4%
5.2%
79.9%
20.1%
2.9%
2012
100%
71.1%
3.4%
1.7%
6.0%
82.2%
17.8%
3.5%
17.2%
14.3%
2011
100%
71.9%
3.5%
2.0%
7.0%
84.4%
15.6%
5.3%
10.3%
We sell a variety of home types in various communities, each yielding a different gross margin. As a result,
depending on the mix of communities delivering homes, consolidated gross margin may fluctuate up or down. Total
homebuilding gross margin percentage, before interest expense and land impairment and option write off charges,
increased to 20.1% for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to 17.8% for the same period last year. The increase in
gross margin percentage was primarily due to the mix of higher margin homes delivered during the year ended October 31,
2013 compared to the prior year. This mix change is a result of delivering more homes in communities where we acquired
the land more recently at lower costs than land acquired before the housing downturn. In addition, during fiscal 2013 and
2012 we saw an increase in the pace of sales in some of our markets and, as a result, in a majority of communities we were
able to increase base prices and increase lot premiums. For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, gross margin
was favorably impacted by the reversal of prior period inventory impairments of $60.5 million, $75.7 million and $91.8
million, respectively, which represented 3.4%, 5.4% and 8.6%, respectively, of “Sale of homes” revenue. During fiscal
2011, there was a declining pace of sales in our markets which led to intense competition in many of our specific
community locations. In order to attempt to maintain a reasonable pace of absorption, we increased incentives, reduced lot
location premiums, and lowered some base prices, all of which significantly impacted our margins and resulted in
significant inventory impairments.
Reflected as inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs in cost of sales (“land charges”), we have
written-off or written-down certain inventories totaling $5.0 million, $12.5 million, and $101.7 million during the years
ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, to their estimated fair value. See “Note 13 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements” for an additional discussion. During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, we wrote-off
residential land options and approval and engineering costs totaling $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and $24.3 million,
respectively, which are included in the total land charges mentioned above. When a community is redesigned or
abandoned, engineering costs are written-off. Option, approval and engineering costs are written-off when a community’s
pro forma profitability is not projected to produce adequate returns on the investment commensurate with the risk and when
we believe it is probable we will cancel the option. Such write-offs were located in all of our segments in fiscal 2011 and
2012 and all segments except the West in 2013. The inventory impairments amounted to $2.4 million, $9.8 million, and
$77.5 million for the years ending October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In fiscal 2013 and 2012, inventory
impairments were lower than they had been in several years as we began to see some stabilization in the prices and sales
pace in some of our segments as reflected by the overall improvement of the housing industry. In fiscal 2011, the majority
of the impairments were in the Northeast and West segments. Impairments in the Northeast were primarily due to
increased weakness in the market, primarily in Northern New Jersey and communities now classified as held for sale or
sold and thus adjusted to fair value. In the West, where we had significant competition from foreclosures, we had reduced
prices in order to maintain sales pace. This was especially true in some of the more fringe markets in our West segment. It
is difficult to predict if this trend will continue, and should it become necessary to further lower prices, or should the
estimates or expectations used in determining estimated cash flows or fair value decrease or differ from current estimates in
the future, we may need to recognize additional impairments.
Below is a breakdown of our lot option walk-aways and impairments by segment for fiscal 2013. In 2013, we
walked away from 9.4% of all the lots we controlled under option contracts. The remaining 90.6% of our option lots are in
communities that we believe remain economically feasible.
43
The following table represents lot option walk-aways by segment for the year ended October 31, 2013:
(In millions)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
Dollar
Amount
of Walk
Number of
Walk-
Away
Away
$0.7
0.1
0.2
0.2
1.4
-
$2.6
Lots
642
280
161
192
336
-
1,611
% of
Walk-
Away
Lots
39.8%
17.4%
10.0%
11.9%
20.9%
0%
100.0%
Total
Option
Lots(1)
3,319
3,245
2,109
2,672
5,059
730
17,134
Walk-
Away
Lots as a
% of Total
Option
Lots
19.3%
8.6%
7.6%
7.2%
6.6%
0%
9.4%
(1) Includes lots optioned at October 31, 2013 and lots optioned that the Company walked away from in the year ended
October 31, 2013.
We can incur costs while investigating land options, whereby we decided not to pursue the opportunity before we
control the lots. These costs are expensed in the period we decided to no longer pursue the opportunity. For the year ended
October 31, 2013, such costs were not significant and are therefore not shown in the tables above. In addition, we
sometimes walk-away from a lot option when we have only incurred costs of less than $50,000, such costs are not shown in
the tables above.
The following table represents impairments by segment for the year ended October 31, 2013:
(In millions)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
Dollar
Amount of
Impairment
$2.4
-
-
-
-
-
$2.4
% of
Impairments(2)
100.0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100.0%
Pre-
Impairment
Value(1)
$7.7
0.1
-
0.4
-
-
$8.2
% of Pre-
Impairment
Value
31.2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
29.3
(1) Represents carrying value, net of prior period impairments, if any, at the time of recording the applicable period’s
impairments.
(2) During the year ended October 31, 2013, the Mid-Atlantic had an impairment totaling $2 thousand and the Southeast
had an impairment totaling $17 thousand.
Land Sales and Other Revenues
Land sales and other revenues consist primarily of land and lot sales. A breakout of land and lot sales is set forth
below:
(In thousands)
Land and lot sales
Cost of sales, net of impairment reversals and excluding interest
Land and lot sales gross margin, excluding interest
Land sales interest expense
Land and lot sales gross margin, including interest
44
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
$17,711
16,012
1,699
291
$1,408
2012
$31,788
24,158
7,630
5,695
$1,935
October 31,
2011
$26,745
8,648
18,097
17,660
$437
Land sales are ancillary to our residential homebuilding operations and are expected to continue in the future but
may significantly fluctuate up or down. Although we budget land sales, they are often dependent upon receiving approvals
and entitlements, the timing of which can be uncertain. As a result, projecting the amount and timing of land sales is
difficult. There were 14 land sales in the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to 16 in the same period of the prior year,
which resulted in a decrease of $14.1 million in land sales revenue. There were 11 land sales in the year ended October 31,
2011, which resulted in an increase of $5.0 million in land sales revenue in fiscal 2012.
Land sales and other revenues decreased $21.8 million and increased $8.1 million for the years ended October 31,
2013 and 2012 compared to the same period in the prior year. Other revenues include income from contract cancellations
where the deposit has been forfeited due to contract terminations, interest income, cash discounts, buyer walk-aways, and
miscellaneous one-time receipts. The decrease for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared to the year ended October
31, 2012, was mainly due to the decrease in land sales discussed above, a $3.0 million decrease in interest income
recognized from a note receivable, as well as minor fluctuations spread across the various components of other revenues.
The primary reason for the increase in land sales and other revenues for fiscal 2012 was due to the increase in land sales
mentioned above, along with a $1.0 million increase in interest income recognized from a note receivable. The remaining
increase relates to minor fluctuations among the various components of other revenues.
Homebuilding Selling, General and Administrative
Homebuilding selling, general and administrative (“SGA”) expenses increased $23.7 million to $165.8 million for
the year ended October 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended October 31, 2012. This increase was due to higher
insurance costs and construction defect reserves and additional reserves for a receivable from an insurance provider and a
receivable related to a prior year land sale. However, these expenses increased by less than the increase in revenues.
Therefore, SGA expenses as a percentage of homebuilding revenues improved to 9.2% for the year ended October 31, 2013
compared to 9.8% for the year ended October 31, 2012. SGA decreased to $142.1 million for the year ended October 31,
2012 from $161.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011. These decreases in SGA expenses were the result of
reduced costs through administrative consolidation and other cost saving measures.
45
Homebuilding Operations by Segment
Financial information relating to the Company’s operations was as follows:
Segment Analysis (Dollars in thousands, except average sales price)
Years Ended October 31,
Variance
2013
Compared
Variance
2012
Compared
2013
to 2012
2012
to 2011
2011
Northeast
Homebuilding revenue
Income (loss) before income taxes
Homes delivered
Average sales price
Mid-Atlantic
Homebuilding revenue
Income (loss) before income taxes
Homes delivered
Average sales price
Midwest
Homebuilding revenue
Income (loss) before income taxes
Homes delivered
Average sales price
Southeast
Homebuilding revenue
Income (loss) before income taxes
Homes delivered
Average sales price
Southwest
Homebuilding revenue
Income before income taxes
Homes delivered
Average sales price
West
Homebuilding revenue
Income (loss) before income taxes
Homes delivered
Average sales price
Homebuilding Results by Segment
$282,855
$1,519
617
$453,314
$49,529 $233,326
$(4,683)
505
$31,342 $201,984
$(99,276)
$94,593
399
106
$20,847 $432,467 $(18,325) $450,792
$6,202
112
$289,303
$24,388
623
$462,798
$16,223 $273,080
$17,262
649
$48,499 $414,299
$7,126
(26)
$73,364 $199,716
$(17,286)
$34,548
524
125
$34,412 $379,887
$163,485
$12,270
657
$247,730
$56,766 $106,719
$253
$12,017
477
180
$24,378 $223,352
$36,152
$9,230
117
$70,567
$(8,977)
360
$27,616 $195,736
$147,570
$6,455
535
$273,391
$18,886 $128,684
$(4,828)
$11,283
482
53
$38,231 $235,160
$49,231
$7,046
143
$79,453
$(11,874)
339
$1,691 $233,469
$697,358 $178,427 $518,931
$42,178
2,003
$36,055 $257,492
$76,459
2,331
$293,547
$34,281
328
$93,779 $425,152
$29,316
$12,862
1,726
277
$14,948 $242,544
$223,086
$14,398
503
$37,235 $185,851
$(3,177)
$17,575
560
(57)
$443,398 $117,218 $326,180
$57,193 $128,658
$(40,599)
$37,422
484
76
$67,285 $258,895
Northeast – Homebuilding revenues increased 21.2% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 22.2% increase
in homes delivered and a 4.8% increase in average selling price, offset by an $11.8 million decrease in land sales and other
revenue. The increase in average sales prices was the result of the mix of communities delivering in fiscal 2013 compared
to 2012. Income before income taxes increased $6.2 million, compared to a loss before income taxes in the prior year, to a
profit of $1.5 million, which was mainly due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above, a decrease of $0.4
million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest
expense for fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012.
Homebuilding revenues increased 15.5% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 26.6% increase in homes
delivered partially offset by a 4.1% decrease in average selling price. The decrease in average sales prices was the result of
the mix of communities delivering in fiscal 2012 compared to 2011. Loss before income taxes decreased $94.6 million to a
loss of $4.7 million, which was mainly due to a decrease of $64.8 million in inventory impairment and land option write-
offs. In addition, selling, general and administrative costs decreased $7.1 million due to decreased salaries from headcount
46
reductions and other overhead cost savings, as well as the increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense for
fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.
Mid-Atlantic – Homebuilding revenues increased 5.9% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to an 11.7%
increase in average selling price, offset by a 4.0% decrease in homes delivered. The increase in average sales price was due
to the mix of communities that delivered in 2013 compared to 2012. Income before income taxes increased $7.1 million to
$24.4 million, due mainly to a decrease of $0.9 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs, an increase of
$3.7 million from income from unconsolidated joint ventures and the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above.
Additionally, the gross margin percentage before interest expense was relatively flat for the fiscal year 2013 compared to
fiscal year 2012.
Homebuilding revenues increased 36.7% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 23.9% increase in homes
delivered, a 9.1% increase in average selling price and a $3.5 million increase in land sales and other revenue. The increase
in average sales price is due to the mix of communities that delivered in 2012 compared to 2011. Loss before income taxes
decreased $34.6 million to a profit of $17.3 million, due mainly to a decrease of $8.5 million in inventory impairment and
land option write-offs and a $5.4 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs. Additionally, the gross
margin percentage before interest expense was relatively flat for the fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011.
Midwest – Homebuilding revenues increased 53.2% in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due
to a 37.7% increase in homes delivered and a 10.9% increase in average sales price. Income before income taxes increased
$12.0 million to $12.3 million. The increase in income was primarily due to the increase in homebuilding revenues
discussed above, a decrease of $1.6 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs, and an increase in gross
margin percentage before interest expense.
Homebuilding revenues increased 51.2% in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to a 32.5%
increase in homes delivered and a 14.1% increase in average sales price. Loss before income taxes decreased $9.2 million
to a profit of $0.3 million. The decrease in the loss was primarily due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed
above and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.
Southeast – Homebuilding revenues increased 14.7% in 2013 compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due
to an 11.0% increase in homes delivered and a 16.3% increase in average sales price. Loss before income taxes decreased
by $11.3 million to a profit of $6.5 million due to the increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above, a decrease of
$3.3 million in inventory impairment and land option write-offs, a $2.5 million decrease in selling, general and
administrative costs and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.
Homebuilding revenues increased 62.0% in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to a 42.2%
increase in homes delivered, a 0.7% increase in average sales price and a $15.0 million increase in land sales and other
revenue. Loss before income taxes decreased $7.1 million to a loss of $4.8 million due to the increase in homebuilding
revenues discussed above and an increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.
Southwest – Homebuilding revenues increased 34.4% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 16.4%
increase in homes delivered, 14.0% increase in average sales price and a $9.9 million increase in land sales and other
revenue. The increase in average sales price was due to the mix of communities that delivered in 2013 compared to 2012.
Income before income taxes increased $34.3 million to $76.5 million in 2013 mainly due to the increase in homebuilding
revenues discussed above. Additionally, the gross margin percentage before interest expense for fiscal year 2013 increased
compared to fiscal year 2012.
Homebuilding revenues increased 22.1% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 16.0% increase in homes
delivered and a 6.2% increase in average sales price. The increase in average sales price is due to the mix of communities
that delivered in 2012 compared to 2011. Income before income taxes increased $12.9 million to $42.2 million in 2012
mainly due to the increase in revenues previously mentioned. Gross margin percentage before interest expense for fiscal
year 2012 was relatively flat compared to fiscal year 2011.
West – Homebuilding revenues increased 20.0% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 35.9% increase in
average sales price, partially offset by a 10.2% decrease in homes delivered, which was due to the different mix of
communities delivered in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012. Loss before income taxes decreased $17.6 million to a profit
of $14.4 million in 2013 due mainly to a $2.3 million decrease in inventory impairment and land option write offs, and the
increase in homebuilding revenues discussed above. In addition, there was a significant increase in gross margin percentage
before interest expense.
47
Homebuilding revenues increased 44.5% in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to a 15.7% increase in homes
delivered and a 26.0% increase in average sales price, due to the different mix of communities delivered in fiscal 2012
compared to fiscal 2011. Loss before income taxes decreased $37.4 million to a loss of $3.2 million in 2012 due mainly to
a $17.3 million decrease in inventory impairment and land option write offs, additional gross margin dollars from
the increased revenues and a $6.3 million decrease in selling, general and administrative costs. In addition, there was an
increase in gross margin percentage before interest expense.
Financial Services
Financial services consist primarily of originating mortgages from our home buyers, selling such mortgages in
the secondary market, and title insurance activities. We use mandatory investor commitments and forward sales of
mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure on agency and government
loans. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk associated with
MBS forward commitments and loan sales transactions is managed by limiting our counterparties to investment banks,
federally regulated bank affiliates and other investors meeting our credit standards. Our risk, in the event of default by the
purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments. For the years
ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Federal Housing Administration and Veterans Administration (“FHA/VA”) loans
represented 32.7%, 41.7%, and 47.2%, respectively, of our total loans. While the origination of FHA/VA loans have
decreased over the last three fiscal years, our conforming conventional loan originations as a percentage of our total loans
increased from 47.1% for fiscal 2011 to 53.7% for fiscal 2012 and to 62.7% for fiscal 2013. Profits and losses relating to
the sale of mortgage loans are recognized when legal control passes to the buyer of the mortgage and the sales price is
collected.
During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, financial services provided an $18.7 million, $15.1
million and $8.1 million pretax profit, respectively. In fiscal 2013, financial services revenues increased $9.0 million to
$47.7 million compared to fiscal 2012 due to increases in the number of mortgage settlements and the average price of the
loans settled. In fiscal 2012, financial services revenue increased $9.3 million to $38.7 million compared to fiscal 2011 due
to increases in the number of mortgage settlements and the average price of loans settled. In the market areas served by our
wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiaries, approximately 71%, 76%, and 77% of our noncash home buyers obtained
mortgages originated by these subsidiaries during the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Servicing rights on new mortgages originated by us are sold with the loans.
Corporate General and Administrative
Corporate general and administrative expenses include the operations at our headquarters in Red Bank, New
Jersey. These expenses include payroll, stock compensation, facility and other costs associated with our executive offices,
information services, human resources, corporate accounting, training, treasury, process redesign, internal audit,
construction services, and administration of insurance, quality, and safety. Corporate general and administrative expenses
increased $6.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to the year ended October 31, 2012, and declined
$1.7 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to the year ended October 31, 2011. The increase in expenses
for fiscal 2013 was due to increased total compensation as a result of a slight increase in headcount, additional amounts
accrued for bonuses as a result of improved operating performance, including achieving profitability for fiscal 2013, and
additional professional services for various corporate operations. The decrease in expenses in fiscal 2012 was due to the
decrease in depreciation expense from capitalized software costs becoming fully depreciated coupled with no new
significant additions of depreciable assets, and a continued effort to tighten variable spending.
Other Interest
Other interest decreased $6.6 million to $91.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2013 compared to October
31, 2012. For fiscal 2012, other interest increased $0.7 million to $97.9 million compared to October 31, 2011. Our assets
that qualify for interest capitalization (inventory under development) are less than our debt, and therefore a portion of
interest not covered by qualifying assets must be directly expensed. In fiscal 2013, our interest incurred decreased
compared to the prior year due to the lower effective interest rates on our outstanding debt and lower overall balance of our
outstanding debt, which resulted in less interest that was required to be directly expensed. For the 2012 and 2011 fiscal
years, other interest was relatively flat.
48
Other Operations
Other operations consist primarily of miscellaneous residential housing operations expenses, senior rental
residential property operations, rent expense for commercial office space, amortization of prepaid bond fees, minority
interest relating to consolidated joint ventures, and corporate owned life insurance. Compared to the previous year, other
operations decreased $3.4 million to $0.8 million for the year ended October 31, 2013, and decreased $0.6 million to $4.2
million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The decrease in expenses from October 31, 2013 compared to October 31,
2012 was due mainly to the $4.7 million of costs incurred from the debt exchange completed in fiscal 2012 discussed above
under “Capital Resources and Liquidity” and also the gain recognized from the sale of one of our senior rental residential
properties in 2013, partially offset by the loss of related rental income in fiscal 2013. Due to the then existing financial
condition of K. Hovnanian as determined in accordance with ASC 470-60 and because the holders of the senior notes that
exchanged such notes for 2021 Notes granted K. Hovnanian a concession in the form of extended maturities and reduced
interest rates, this debt exchange was accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring, which required any costs incurred
associated with the exchange to be expensed as incurred. The decrease in other operations from October 31, 2011 to
October 31, 2012 was primarily due to the gain recognized from the sale of one of our senior residential properties partially
offset by the cost incurred from the debt exchange on November 1, 2011 previously discussed.
(Loss) Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
During the year ended October 31, 2013, our loss on extinguishment of debt decreased $28.3 million to $0.8
million. In the fourth quarter of 2013, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $41.6 million of its 6.25%
Senior Notes due 2016. The Notes were issued as additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 under the indenture dated as of
August 8, 2005. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund the redemption on October 15, 2013 of all of K.
Hovnanian’s outstanding 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay related fees and
expenses. These transactions resulted in a write-off of prepaid fees and a make whole true-up, totaling $0.8 million. During
the year ended October 31, 2012, our loss on extinguishment of debt was $29.1 million. During 2012, we repurchased for
cash in the open market and privately negotiated transactions a total of $121.4 million principal amount of various issues of
our unsecured notes for an aggregate purchase price of $72.2 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We recognized a
gain of $48.4 million net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees related to these purchases, which represents the
difference between the aggregate principal amounts of the notes purchased and the total purchase price. In addition, we
exchanged a total of $33.2 million aggregate principal amount of various issuances of our outstanding senior notes senior
and our 12.072% senior subordinated amortizing notes for Class A Common Stock. These transactions resulted in a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $9.5 million. We also repurchased in a tender offer our 10.625% senior secured notes due 2016
and satisfied and discharged the indenture under which such notes were issued (calling the remaining notes for
redemption). We paid a premium, incurred fees and wrote off discounts and prepaid costs that were amortizing over the
terms of the 10.625% senior secured notes, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87.0 million.
During the year ended October 31, 2011, our gain on extinguishment of debt was $7.5 million. In February of
2011, we purchased a portion of our subordinated notes ($97.9 million face for $98.6 million cash in a tender offer), and
redeemed early the remainder of those notes ($57.8 million in debt for $58.1 million cash). In both transactions, we paid a
premium, incurred fees, and wrote off discounts and prepaid costs that we were amortizing over the term of the notes. On
June 3, 2011, we redeemed early the remainder of certain of our senior secured notes. These transactions resulted in a loss
of $3.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2011. Offsetting this loss was a gain of $10.6 million on open market
repurchases during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we repurchased in the open market
a total of $25.6 million principal amount of various issues of our unsecured senior notes due 2014 through 2015 for an
aggregate purchase price of $14.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The net gain of $7.5 million for the year ended
October 31, 2011, is net of the write-offs of unamortized discounts and fees, related to these purchases, which represents
the difference between the aggregate principal amounts of the notes purchased and the total purchase price.
Income (Loss) From Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures consists of our share of the earnings or losses of the joint
ventures. Income from unconsolidated joint ventures increased $6.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2013. Income
was $12.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2013, compared $5.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The
increase in income was due to certain of our homebuilding joint ventures delivering more homes and reporting increased
profits in fiscal 2013. In addition, we recognized a higher profit from one of our land development joint ventures during
fiscal 2013, which had a larger land sale in the current fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year. Income from
unconsolidated joint ventures increased $14.4 million to $5.4 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 compared to a
loss of $9.0 million for the year ended October 31, 2011. The decrease in loss to income was due to five of our
49
homebuilding joint ventures, which reported losses in fiscal 2011, delivering more homes and reporting profits or a
decreased loss in fiscal 2012. In addition, we recognized profit from one of our land development joint ventures during
fiscal 2012, which did not have any activity in the prior year.
Total Taxes
The total income tax benefit of $9.4 million recognized for the year ended October 31, 2013 was primarily due to
the release of reserves for a federal tax position that was settled with the Internal Revenue Service and a favorable state tax
audit settlement, partially offset by state tax expenses and state tax reserves for uncertain state tax positions. The total
income tax benefit was $35.1 million for the year ended October 31, 2012 primarily due to the elimination of reserves for
uncertain state tax positions consistent with past practices and precedents of the relevant taxing authorities in their dealings
with the Company, offset slightly by state tax expenses. The total income tax benefit was $5.5 million for the year ended
October 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in tax reserves for uncertain tax positions.
Deferred federal and state income tax assets primarily represent the deferred tax benefits arising from temporary
differences between book and tax income which will be recognized in future years as an offset against future taxable
income. If the combination of future years’ income (or loss) and the reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such
losses can be carried forward to future years. In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to
determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances
should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. Because
of the downturn in the homebuilding industry, resulting in significant inventory and intangible impairments in prior years,
we are in a three-year cumulative loss position as of October 31, 2013. According to ASC 740, a three-year cumulative loss
is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable. Our valuation allowance for
deferred taxes amounted to $927.1 million and $937.9 million at October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, respectively. The
valuation allowance decreased during the year ended October 31, 2013 primarily due to a decrease in deferred tax assets as
a result of generating a profit before income taxes for fiscal 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land and lot option purchase contracts in order to procure land or
lots for the construction of homes. Lot option contracts enable us to control significant lot positions with a minimal capital
investment and substantially reduce the risks associated with land ownership and development. At October 31, 2013, we
had $79.3 million in option deposits in cash and letters of credit to purchase land and lots with a total purchase price of $1.1
billion. Our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the nonrefundable deposits, letters of credit and other
nonrefundable amounts incurred. We have no material third-party guarantees.
Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes our aggregate contractual commitments at October 31, 2013. There were no specific
performance option contracts as of October 31, 2013.
Payments Due by Period (1)
(In thousands)
Long term debt(2)(3)
Operating leases
Total
Total
$2,171,814
33,036
$2,204,850
1 year
Less than
1-3 years
More than
5 years
$116,916 $549,377 $362,060 $1,143,461
1,438
$127,547 $566,239 $366,165 $1,144,899
3-5 years
16,862
10,631
4,105
(1) Total contractual obligations exclude our accrual for uncertain tax positions of $2.3 million recorded for financial
reporting purposes as of October 31, 2013 because we were unable to make reasonable estimates as to the period of
cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.
(2) Represents our senior secured, senior, senior amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing
notes, and other notes payable and related interest payments for the life of such debt of $609.9 million.
(3) Does not include the mortgage warehouse lines of credit made under our Master Repurchase Agreements. See“-
Capital Resources and Liquidity”. Also does not include our $75.0 million revolving Credit Facility because there
were no borrowings outstanding (there were issued $25.8 million of letters of credit) under such facility as of October
31, 2013.
50
We had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of approximately $30.9 million and $242.0 million,
respectively, at October 31, 2013, related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other
improvements in various developments. We do not believe that any such letters of credit or bonds are likely to be drawn
upon.
Inflation
Inflation has a long-term effect, because increasing costs of land, materials, and labor result in increasing sale
prices of our homes. In general, these price increases have been commensurate with the general rate of inflation in our
housing markets and have not had a significant adverse effect on the sale of our homes. A significant risk faced by the
housing industry generally is that rising house construction costs, including land and interest costs, will substantially
outpace increases in the income of potential purchasers.
Inflation has a lesser short-term effect, because we generally negotiate fixed price contracts with many, but not
all, of our subcontractors and material suppliers for the construction of our homes. These prices usually are applicable for a
specified number of residential buildings or for a time period of between three to twelve months. Construction costs for
residential buildings represent approximately 56.8% of our homebuilding cost of sales.
51
Safe Harbor Statement
All statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts should be considered as
“Forward- Looking Statements” within the meaning of the "Safe Harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions
and expectations reflected in, or suggested by, such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance
that such plans, intentions, or expectations will be achieved. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not
limited to:
● Changes in general and local economic, industry and business conditions and impacts of the sustained
homebuilding downturn;
● Adverse weather and other environmental conditions and natural disasters;
● Changes in market conditions and seasonality of the Company’s business;
● Changes in home prices and sales activity in the markets where the Company builds homes;
● Government regulation, including regulations concerning development of land, the home building, sales and
customer financing processes, tax laws, and the environment;
● Fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of mortgage financing;
● Shortages in, and price fluctuations of, raw materials and labor;
● The availability and cost of suitable land and improved lots;
● Levels of competition;
● Availability of financing to the Company;
● Utility shortages and outages or rate fluctuations;
● Levels of indebtedness and restrictions on the Company’s operations and activities imposed by the agreements
governing the Company’s outstanding indebtedness;
● The Company's sources of liquidity;
● Changes in credit ratings;
● Availability of net operating loss carryforwards;
● Operations through joint ventures with third parties;
● Product liability litigation, warranty claims and claims made by mortgage investors;
● Successful identification and integration of acquisitions;
● Changes in tax laws affecting the after-tax costs of owning a home;
● Significant influence of the Company’s controlling stockholders; and
● Geopolitical risks, terrorist acts and other acts of war.
Certain risks, uncertainties, and other factors are described in detail in Part I, Item 1 “Business” and Part I, Item
1A “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as otherwise required by applicable securities laws, we
52
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
A primary market risk facing us is interest rate risk on our long term debt, including debt instruments at variable
interest rates. In connection with our mortgage operations, mortgage loans held for sale, and the associated mortgage
warehouse lines of credit under our Master Repurchase Agreements are subject to interest rate risk; however, such
obligations reprice frequently and are short-term in duration. In addition, we hedge the interest rate risk on mortgage loans
by obtaining forward commitments from private investors. Accordingly, the interest rate risk from mortgage loans is not
material. We do not use financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk except with respect to mortgage loans. We are also
subject to foreign currency risk but we do not believe this risk is material. The following tables set forth as of October 31,
2013 and 2012, our long-term debt obligations, principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average interest rates
and estimated fair value (“FV”).
Long-Term Debt Tables
Long-Term Debt as of October 31, 2013 by Fiscal Year of Debt Maturity
(Dollars in
thousands)
Long term debt(1):
Fixed rate
Weighted average
interest rate
2014
2016
$69,978 $87,685 $265,272
2015
FV at
10/31/13
$127,662 $4,311 $1,069,925 $1,624,833 $1,693,318
2018 Thereafter
2017
Total
6.19% 10.39%
6.75%
8.70%
9.62%
7.00%
7.24%
(1) Does not include the mortgage warehouse lines of credit made under our Master Repurchase Agreements. Also
does not include our $75 million revolving Credit Facility under which there were no borrowings outstanding and
$25.8 million of letters of credit issued as of October 31, 2013.
Long-Term Debt as of October 31, 2012 by Fiscal Year of Debt Maturity
(Dollars in
thousands)
Long term debt(1):
Fixed rate
Weighted average
interest rate
FV at
10/31/12
$43,283 $39,916 $86,462 $218,974 $122,412 $1,104,778 $1,615,825 $1,615,840
2017 Thereafter
2015
2013
2014
2016
Total
6.95%
6.55%
10.22%
6.75%
8.61%
7.07%
7.30%
(1) Does not include the mortgage warehouse lines of credit made under our Master Repurchase Agreements.
ITEM 8
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial statements of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are set forth herein beginning
on page 64.
ITEM 9
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its chief executive officer and chief financial
53
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. The
Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of October
31, 2013. Based upon that evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief
financial officer concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to accomplish their objectives.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter
ended October 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those
systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation
and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of October 31,
2013.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2013 has been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
below.
54
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of October 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's
principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's
board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use,
or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to
future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
October 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended October 31, 2013 of the Company and our report
dated December 20, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, NY
December 20, 2013
55
ITEM 9B
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information called for by Item 10, except as set forth in this Item 10, is incorporated herein by reference to our
definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to
be held on March 11, 2014, which will involve the election of directors.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers are listed below and brief summaries of their business experience and certain other
information with respect to them are set forth following the table. Each executive officer holds such office for a one-year
term.
Name
Ara K. Hovnanian
Thomas J. Pellerito
J. Larry Sorsby
Age Position
56 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director of
the Company
66 Chief Operating Officer
58 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company
Brad G. O’Connor
David G. Valiaveedan
43 Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller
46 Vice President Finance and Treasurer
Year
Started
With
Company
1979
2001
1988
2004
2005
Mr. Hovnanian has been Chief Executive Officer since July 1997 after being appointed President in 1988 and
Executive Vice President in 1983. Mr. Hovnanian joined the Company in 1979 and has been a Director of the Company
since 1981 and was Vice Chairman from 1998 through November 2009. In November 2009, he was elected Chairman of
the Board following the death of Kevork S. Hovnanian, the chairman and founder of the Company and the father of Mr.
Hovnanian.
Mr. Pellerito was appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Company in January 2010. Since joining the Company
in connection with the Company's acquisition of Washington Homes, Inc. in 2001, Mr. Pellerito has served as a Group
President overseeing homebuilding operations in certain of the Company's Mid-Atlantic and Southeast segments (excluding
Florida). Before joining the Company, Mr. Pellerito was the President of homebuilding operations and Chief Operating
Officer of Washington Homes, Inc.
Mr. Sorsby has been Chief Financial Officer of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. since 1996, and Executive Vice
President since November 2000. Mr. Sorsby was also Senior Vice President from March 1991 to November 2000 and was
elected as a Director of the Company in 1997. He is Chairman of the Board of Visitors for Urology at The Children’s
Hospital of Philadelphia (“CHOP”) and also serves on the Institutional Advancement Committee at CHOP.
Mr. O’Connor joined the Company in April 2004 as Vice President and Associate Corporate Controller. In
December 2007, he was promoted to Vice President, Corporate Controller and then in May 2011, he also became Vice
President, Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. O’Connor was the Corporate Controller for
Amershem Biosciences, and prior to that a Senior Manager in the audit practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Mr. Valiaveedan joined the Company as Vice President - Finance in September 2005. In August 2008, he was
named as an executive officer of the Company and, in December 2009, he was also named Treasurer. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Valiaveedan served as Vice President - Finance for AIG Global Real Estate Investment Corp.
56
Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines
In more than 50 years of doing business, we have been committed to enhancing our shareholders’ investment
through conduct that is in accordance with the highest levels of integrity. Our Code of Ethics is a set of guidelines and
policies that govern broad principles of ethical conduct and integrity embraced by our Company. Our Code of Ethics
applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, chief accounting officer, and all other associates of our
Company, including our directors and other officers.
We also remain committed to fostering sound corporate governance principles. The Company’s Corporate
Governance Guidelines” assist the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) in fulfilling its responsibilities related
to corporate governance conduct. These guidelines serve as a framework, addressing the function, structure, and operations
of the Board, for purposes of promoting consistency of the Board’s role in overseeing the work of management.
We have posted our Code of Ethics on our web site at www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate
Governance”. We have also posted our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our web site at www.khov.com under
“Investor Relations/Corporate Governance”. A printed copy of the Code of Ethics and Guidelines is also available to the
public at no charge by writing to: Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Attn: Human Resources Department, 110 West Front Street,
P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, N.J. 07701 or calling corporate headquarters at 732-747-7800. We will post amendments to or
waivers from our Code of Ethics that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the New York Stock
Exchange (the “NYSE”) on our web site at www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance.”
Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charters
We have adopted charters that apply to the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. We have posted the text of these charters on our web site at
www.khov.com under “Investor Relations/Corporate Governance.” A printed copy of each charter is available at no charge
to any shareholder who requests it by writing to: Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Attn: Human Resources Department, 110
West Front Street, P.O. Box 500, Red Bank, N.J. 07701 or calling corporate headquarters at 732-747-7800.
ITEM 11
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information called for by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.
ITEM 12
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information called for by Item 12, is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.
ITEM 13
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information called for by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.
ITEM 14
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information called for by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with our annual meeting of shareholders to be held on March 11, 2014.
57
PART IV
ITEM 15
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements ....................................................................................................................
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .............................................................................................
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2013 and 2012 ...........................................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 .....................................
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ............................................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ....................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ....................................................................................................................
Page
64
65
66
68
69
70
72
No schedules have been prepared because the required information of such schedules is not present, is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the financial
statements and notes thereto.
Exhibits:
3(a)
3(b)
4(a)
4(b)
4(c)
4(d)
4(e)
4(f)
4(g)
4(h)
4(i)
4(j)
4(k)
4(l)
4(m)
4(n)
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.(5)
Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.(24)
Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate.(13)
Specimen Class B Common Stock Certificate.(13)
Certificate of Designations, Powers, Preferences and Rights of the 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock of
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., dated July 12, 2005.(11)
Certificate of Designations of the Series B Junior Preferred Stock of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., dated
August 14, 2008.(1)
Rights Agreement, dated as of August 14, 2008, between Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and National City Bank, as
Rights Agent, which includes the Form of Certificate of Designation as Exhibit A, Form of Right Certificate as
Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights as Exhibit C.(22)
Indenture dated as of November 3, 2003, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee.(2)
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 16, 2013, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.,
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., and the other guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, as trustee, including form of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. (15)
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 18, 2004, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee),
as Trustee.(18)
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2004, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee),
as Trustee.(18)
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 19, 2005, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee),
as Trustee.(18)
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 6, 2005, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee),
as Trustee.(18)
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 27, 2006, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee),
as Trustee (including form of 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016).(19)
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 12, 2006, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee),
as Trustee (including form of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017).(20)
Indenture dated as of November 30, 2004, relating to 6.25% Senior Notes, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.,
the Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as Trustee, including
form of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2015.(6)
58
4(o)
4(p)
4(q)
4(r)
4(s)
4(t)
4(u)
4(v)
4(w)
4(x)
4(y)
4(z)
4(aa)
4(bb)
10(a)
10(b)
10(c)
10(d)
10(e)
10(f)
Indenture dated as of August 8, 2005, relating to 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, among K. Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., the Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company (as successor trustee), as
Trustee including form of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016.(7)
Indenture dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020, among K.
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington
Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent, including the form of 7.25% Senior Secured First
Lien Note due 2020.(14)
Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2011, relating to Senior Debt Securities, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises,
Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee.(12)
Senior Notes Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 14, 2011, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.,
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein with Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee,
including form of Senior Note.(10)
Indenture, dated as of February 9, 2011, relating to Senior Subordinated Debt Securities, among K. Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee.(12)
Amortizing Notes Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 9, 2011, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.,
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee,
including form of Amortizing Note.(10)
Purchase Contract Agreement, dated as of February 9, 2011, among Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., K. Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee under the Amortizing Notes Indenture, as Purchase
Contract Agent and as attorney-in-fact for the holders of the Purchase Contracts from time to time, including
form of Unit and form of Purchase Contract.(10)
Indenture dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020,
among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the other guarantors named therein and
Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent, including the form of 9.125% Senior
Secured Second Lien Note due 2020.(14)
Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 21, 2011, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (as
successor trustee), as trustee, relating to 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017.(9)
Secured Notes Indenture dated as of November 1, 2011 relating to the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and
2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the
other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as Trustee and Collateral Agent,
including the forms of 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.(4)
Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 1, 2011, relating to the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015, among K.
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., as guarantor, the other guarantors named therein and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee.(4)
Units Agreement, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and Wilmington Trust
Company, as Units Agent, including form of Unit, component amortizing notes and component exchangeable
notes.(14)
Amortizing Notes Indenture, dated as of October 2, 2012, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, including
the form of Amortizing Note. (14)
Exchangeable Notes Indenture, dated as of October 2, 2012, among K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc. and the other guarantors named therein and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, including
the form of Exchangeable Note.(14)
First Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes
due 2020.(14)
Second Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien
Notes due 2020.(14)
First Lien Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25% Senior Secured First Lien
Notes due 2020.(14)
Second Lien Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 9.125% Senior Secured Second
Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
Form of First Lien Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the 7.25%
Senior Secured First Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
Form of Second Lien Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of October 2, 2012, relating to the
9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2020.(14)
59
10(g)
10(h)
10(i)
Intercreditor Agreement, dated October 2, 2012, among Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., K. Hovnanian Enterprises,
Inc., the other guarantors party thereto, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent
under the Senior Noteholder Documents as defined therein, Wilmington Trust, National Association, as collateral
agent for the Mortgage Tax Collateral as defined therein, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee
and collateral agent under the Junior Noteholder Documents as defined therein.(14)
First Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2011, relating to the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021
and the 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.(4)
First Lien Security Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2011, relating to the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due
2021 and the 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021.(4)
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (2012) for Ara K. Hovnanian. (32)
10(j)*
10(k)* Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Class A shares).(25)
10(l)* Amended and Restated 2008 Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan.(16)
10(m)* 1983 Stock Option Plan (as amended and restated).(17)
10(n) Management Agreement dated August 12, 1983, for the management of properties by K. Hovnanian Investment
Properties, Inc.(3)
10(o) Management Agreement dated December 15, 1985, for the management of properties by K. Hovnanian
Investment Properties, Inc.(21)
Form of Hovnanian Deferred Share Policy for Senior Executives.(8)
Form of Hovnanian Deferred Share Policy.(8)
10(p)* Executive Deferred Compensation Plan as amended and restated on May 24, 2012. (32)
10(q)* Amended and Restated Senior Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan.(26)
10(r)* Death and Disability Agreement between the Registrant and Ara K. Hovnanian, dated February 2, 2006. (28)
10(s)*
10(t)*
10(u)* Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (Class B shares).(8)
10(v)* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(8)
10(w)* Form of Stock Option Agreement for Directors.(8)
10(x)* Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement.(8)
10(y)* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(27)
10(z)* Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement.(27)
10(aa)* Form of Performance Vesting Incentive Stock Option Agreement.(27)
10(bb)* Form of Performance Vesting Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.(27)
10(cc)* Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Directors.(25)
10(dd)* Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (Class A Shares).(23)
10(ee)* Form of Long Term Incentive Program Award Agreement (Class B Shares).(23)
10(ff)* Form of Change in Control Severance Protection Agreement entered into with each of Brad G. O’Connor and
David G. Valiaveedan.(29)
10(gg)* 2012 Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan. (30)
10(hh)* Form of Amendment to Outstanding Stock Option Grants.(31)
10(ii)* Form of Amendment to 2011 Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Ara K. Hovnanian and J. Larry Sorsby. (31)
10(jj)* Form of Amendment to 2011 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Ara K. Hovnanian.(31)
10(kk)* Form of Amendment to 2011 Incentive Stock Option Agreement for J. Larry Sorsby.(31)
10(ll)* Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (2012).(32)
10(mm)* Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2012).(32)
10(nn)* Form of Stock Option Agreement (2012) for Directors.(32)
10(oo)* Form of Restricted Share Unit Agreement (2012) for Directors.(32)
10(pp)* Form of 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program Award. (33)
10(qq)* Form of 2013 Incentive Stock Option Agreement – Performance Option Grant (Class A shares). (34)
10(rr)* Form of 2013 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement – Performance Option Grant (Class B shares).(34)
12
21
23
31(a)
31(b)
32(a)
32(b)
101
Statements re Computation of Ratios.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
The following financial information from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2013,
formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at October
31, 2013 and October 31, 2012, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended October 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Equity for years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and
2011 (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and
60
(v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) filed on
November 7, 2003.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement (No. 2-85198) on Form S-1 of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on
November 7, 2011.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) filed on
March 15, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement (No. 333-127806) on Form S-4 of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on
May 5, 2011.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant (No. 001-08551) filed
February 15, 2011.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on
July 13, 2005.
*
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011
(No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009
(No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on
October 2, 2012.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on
September 16, 2013.
Incorporated by reference to definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of the Registrant filed on February 1,
2010.
Incorporated by reference to Appendix C of the definitive Proxy Statement of the Registration on Schedule 14A
filed on February 19, 2008.
(18)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Registration Statement (No. 333-131982) on Form S-3 of the Registrant.
(19)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report of the Registrant on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) filed on
February 27, 2006.
61
(20)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant (No. 001-08551) filed on
June 15, 2006.
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2003 (No.
001-08551), of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Registration Statement (No. 001-08551) on Form 8-A of the Registrant
filed August 14, 2008
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 (No.
001-08551), of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant (No. 001-08551), filed
December 21, 2009.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 (No.
001-08551), of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Current Report on Form 8-K (No. 001-08551) of the Registrant filed on
March 22, 2010.
Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 (No. 001-
08551), of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006
(No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2012
(No. 001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of the Registrant filed
on February 14, 2012.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2012 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2013 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2013 (No.
001-08551) of the Registrant.
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
By: /s/ ARA K. HOVNANIAN
Ara K. Hovnanian
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, and President
December 20, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant on December 20, 2013, and in the capacities indicated.
/S/ ARA K. HOVNANIAN
Ara K. Hovnanian
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ BRAD G. O'CONNOR
Brad G. O’Connor
Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ EDWARD A. KANGAS
Chairman of Audit Committee and Director
Edward A. Kangas
/s/ J. LARRY SORSBY
J. Larry Sorsby
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ STEPHEN D. WEINROTH
Chairman of Compensation Committee and Director
Stephen D. Weinroth
63
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .............................................................................................
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2013 and 2012 .......................................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ...................................
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ..........................................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 ..................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ....................................................................................................................
Page
65
66
68
69
70
72
No schedules have been prepared because the required information of such schedules is not present, is not present in
amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the required information is included in the financial
statements and notes thereto.
64
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated December 20, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control
over financial reporting.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, NY
December 20, 2013
65
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
ASSETS
Homebuilding:
Cash
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
Inventories:
Sold and unsold homes and lots under development
Land and land options held for future development or sale
Consolidated inventory not owned:
Specific performance options
Other options
Total consolidated inventory not owned
Total inventories
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures
Receivables, deposits, and notes - net
Property, plant, and equipment - net
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Total homebuilding
Financial services:
Cash
Restricted cash and cash equivalents
Mortgage loans held for sale at fair value
Other assets
Total financial services
Total assets
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
October 31,
2013
October 31,
2012
$319,142
10,286
$258,323
41,732
752,749
225,152
671,851
218,996
792
100,071
100,863
1,078,764
51,438
45,085
46,211
59,351
1,610,277
-
90,619
90,619
981,466
61,083
61,794
48,524
66,694
1,519,616
10,062
21,557
112,953
4,281
148,853
$1,759,130
14,909
22,470
117,024
10,231
164,634
$1,684,250
66
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Homebuilding:
Nonrecourse mortgages
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Customers’ deposits
Nonrecourse mortgages secured by operating properties
Liabilities from inventory not owned
Total homebuilding
Financial services:
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
Total financial services
Notes payable:
Senior secured notes
Senior notes
Senior amortizing notes
Senior exchangeable notes
TEU senior subordinated amortizing notes
Accrued interest
Total notes payable
Income taxes payable
Total liabilities
Equity:
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. stockholders' equity deficit:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value - authorized 100,000 shares; issued and outstanding
5,600 shares with a liquidation preference of $140,000 at October 31, 2013 and
2012
Common stock, Class A, $.01 par value - authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued
136,306,223 shares at October 31, 2013 and 130,055,304 shares at October 31,
2012 (including 11,760,763 shares at October 31, 2013 and 2012, held in
Treasury)
Common stock, Class B, $.01 par value (convertible to Class A at time of sale) -
authorized 60,000,000 shares; issued 15,347,615 shares at October 31, 2013
and 15,350,101 shares at October 31, 2012 (including 691,748 shares at
October 31, 2013 and 2012 held in Treasury)
Paid in capital - common stock
Accumulated deficit
Treasury stock - at cost
Total Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. stockholders' equity deficit
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated joint ventures
Total equity deficit
Total liabilities and equity
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
October 31,
2013
October 31,
2012
$62,903
307,764
30,119
17,733
87,866
506,385
32,874
91,663
124,537
978,611
461,210
20,857
66,615
2,152
28,261
1,557,706
3,301
2,191,929
$38,302
296,510
23,846
18,775
77,791
455,224
37,609
107,485
145,094
977,369
458,736
23,149
76,851
6,091
20,199
1,562,395
6,882
2,169,595
135,299
135,299
1,363
1,300
153
689,727
(1,144,408 )
(115,360 )
(433,226 )
427
(432,799 )
$1,759,130
154
668,735
(1,175,703)
(115,360)
(485,575)
230
(485,345)
$1,684,250
67
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except per share data)
Revenues:
Homebuilding:
Sale of homes
Land sales and other revenues
Total homebuilding
Financial services
Total revenues
Expenses:
Homebuilding:
Cost of sales, excluding interest
Cost of sales interest
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs
Total cost of sales
Selling, general and administrative
Total homebuilding expenses
Financial services
Corporate general and administrative
Other interest
Other operations
Total expenses
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures
Income (loss) before income taxes
State and federal income tax (benefit) provision:
State
Federal
Total income taxes
Net income (loss)
Per share data:
Basic:
Income (loss) per common share
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
Assuming dilution:
Income (loss) per common share
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
October 31,
2011
$1,784,327
19,199
1,803,526
47,727
1,851,253
$1,405,580
41,038
1,446,618
38,735
1,485,353
$1,072,474
32,952
1,105,426
29,481
1,134,907
1,442,044
52,230
4,965
1,499,239
165,809
1,665,048
29,059
54,357
91,344
790
1,840,598
(760)
12,040
21,935
518
(9,878)
(9,360)
$31,295
1,179,801
54,538
12,530
1,246,869
142,087
1,388,956
23,648
48,232
97,895
4,205
1,562,936
(29,066 )
5,401
(101,248 )
(35,328 )
277
(35,051 )
$(66,197 )
913,901
74,676
101,749
1,090,326
161,456
1,251,782
21,371
49,938
97,169
4,805
1,425,065
7,528
(8,958)
(291,588)
(3,924)
(1,577)
(5,501)
$(286,087)
$0.22
145,087
$0.22
162,329
$(0.52 )
126,350
$(0.52 )
126,350
$(2.85)
100,444
$(2.85)
100,444
68
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
A Common Stock
Shares
Issued and
Outstanding
B Common Stock
Shares
Issued and
Outstanding
Amount
Amount
Preferred Stock
Shares
Issued and
Outstanding
Amount
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
Treasury
Deficit
Stock
Non
Controlling
Interest
Total
(Dollars In thousands)
Balance, October 31,
2010
Stock options,
amortization and
issuances
Restricted stock
amortization,
issuances and
forfeitures
Stock Issuance
Issuance of prepaid
common stock
purchase contracts
Settlement of prepaid
common stock
purchase contracts
Conversion of Class B
to Class A common
stock
Changes in
noncontrolling
interest in
consolidated joint
ventures
Net loss
Balance, October 31,
63,114,963
$
748
14,564,795
$
153
5,600
$
135,299
$
463,908
$
(823,419) $
(115,257)
$
630 $(337,938)
414,320
13,512,500
4
135
3,400,658
34
4,331
(4,331)
4,377
589
54,764
68,092
(34)
4,377
593
54,899
68,092
-
-
(286,087)
(538)
(538)
(286,087)
2011
80,446,772
921
14,560,464
153
5,600
135,299
591,696
(1,109,506)
(115,257)
92 (496,602)
Stock options,
amortization and
issuances
Restricted stock
amortization,
issuances and
forfeitures
Stock issuance
Issuance of shares for
debt
Settlement of prepaid
common stock
purchase contracts
Conversion of Class B
to Class A common
stock
Changes in
noncontrolling
interest in
consolidated joint
ventures
Treasury stock
purchases
Net loss
Balance, October 31,
2012
Stock options,
amortization and
issuances
Restricted stock
amortization,
issuances and
forfeitures
Settlement of prepaid
Class A Common
Stock purchase
contracts
Exchange of senior
exchangeable notes
for Class A Common
Stock
Conversion of Class B
to Class A common
stock
Changes in
noncontrolling
interest in
consolidated joint
ventures
Net income
Balance, October 31,
6,250
172,941
25,000,000
8,443,713
2
250
84
4,271,398
43
117,399
1
19,510
(19,510)
(66,043)
4,078
2,763
47,074
23,167
(43)
4,078
2,766
47,324
23,251
-
-
(66,197)
(103)
138
138
(103)
(66,197)
118,294,541
1,300
14,658,353
154
5,600
135,299
668,735
(1,175,703)
(115,360)
230 (485,345)
44,812
123,840
1
2,683,679
27
3,396,102
34
2,486
1
(2,486)
(1)
4,169
2,608
(27)
14,242
4,169
2,609
-
14,276
-
31,295
197
197
31,295
2013
124,545,460
$
1,363
14,655,867
$
153
5,600
$
135,299
$
689,727
$ (1,144,408) $
(115,360)
$
427 $(432,799)
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
69
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities:
Depreciation
Compensation from stock options and awards
Amortization of bond discounts and deferred financing costs
Gain on sale and retirement of property and assets
(Income) loss from unconsolidated joint ventures
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt
Expenses related to the debt for debt exchange
Inventory impairment and land option write-offs
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Mortgage notes receivable
Restricted cash, receivables, prepaids, deposits, and other assets
Inventories
(Decrease) increase in liabilities:
State and federal income tax liabilities
Customers’ deposits
Accounts payable, accrued interest and other accrued liabilities
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of property and assets
Purchase of property, equipment, and other fixed assets and acquisitions
Increase in restricted cash related to mortgage company
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from mortgages and notes
Payments related to mortgages and notes
Proceeds from model sale leaseback financing programs
Payments related to model sale leaseback financing programs
Proceeds from land bank financing program
Payments related to land bank financing program
Net proceeds from senior secured notes
Proceeds from senior notes
Payments from senior notes
Net proceeds from exchangeable notes units
Net proceeds from tangible equity units
Net proceeds from Class A Common Stock
Net (payments) proceeds related to mortgage warehouse lines of credit
Deferred financing cost from land banking financing program and note
issuances
Principal payments and debt repurchases
Payments related to the debt for debt exchange
Purchase of treasury stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents balance, beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents balance, end of year
Supplemental disclosures of cash flows:
Cash received during the year for income taxes
70
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
2012
October 31,
2011
$31,295
$(66,197 )
$(286,087)
4,712
6,842
7,843
(4,696)
(12,040)
2,340
760
-
4,965
4,071
52,940
(111,770)
(3,581)
6,273
19,314
9,268
7,369
(1,558)
4,575
(4,907)
24,806
30,285
109,209
(76,142)
21,948
(9,193)
36,233
(39,669)
-
41,581
(40,424)
-
-
-
(15,822)
(5,071)
(6,231)
-
-
16,419
55,972
273,232
$329,204
6,223
6,453
7,436
(230 )
(5,401 )
1,790
29,066
4,694
12,530
(44,852 )
3,680
8,430
(34,947 )
5,903
(1,576 )
(66,998 )
3,206
(5,059 )
-
(4,743 )
5,096
(1,500 )
16,240
(25,605 )
34,389
(1,444 )
50,927
(6,081 )
797,000
-
-
100,000
-
47,324
57,756
(19,381 )
(941,158 )
(18,874 )
(103 )
90,990
22,492
250,740
$273,232
9,340
6,219
6,047
(266)
8,958
1,583
(7,528)
-
101,749
14,154
59,686
(88,385)
23,919
7,150
(63,954)
(207,415)
1,341
(826)
-
(4,071)
4,751
1,195
16,614
(14,247)
-
-
-
-
12,660
151,220
-
-
83,707
54,899
(23,914)
(5,396)
(185,763)
-
-
89,780
(116,440)
367,180
$250,740
$5,780
$103
$28,008
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing activities:
In fiscal 2013, a property that we previously acquired when our partner in a land development joint venture
transferred its interest in the venture to us, was foreclosed on by the note holder. As a result, the inventory with a book
value of $9.5 million and corresponding non-recourse liability of equal amount were taken off of our balance sheet.
In fiscal 2013, 18,305 of our senior exchangeable notes were exchanged for 3,396,102 shares of Class A Common
Stock.
In fiscal 2013, we entered into a new unconsolidated homebuilding joint venture which resulted in the transfer of
an existing receivable from our joint venture partners of $0.6 million at October 31, 2012, to an investment in the joint
venture at January 31, 2013.
During fiscal 2012, we purchased our partners’ interest in one of our unconsolidated homebuilding joint
ventures. The consolidation of this entity resulted in increases in inventory, other assets, non-recourse land mortgages and
accounts payables and other liabilities of $34.3 million, $5.0 million, $20.6 million and $15.8 million, respectively.
In fiscal 2012, we completed several debt for equity exchanges and a debt for debt exchange. See Notes 9 and 10
for further information.
In fiscal 2011, our partner in a land development joint venture transferred its interest in the venture to us. The
consolidation resulted in increases in inventory and non-recourse land mortgages of $9.5 million and $18.5 million,
respectively, and a decrease in other liabilities of $9.0 million.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
71
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation - The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and include our accounts and those of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries, and variable interest entities in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary, after elimination of all
significant intercompany balances and transactions. Our fiscal year ends October 31.
2. Business
Our operations consist of homebuilding, financial services, and corporate. Our homebuilding operations are made
up of six reportable segments defined as Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and West. Homebuilding
operations comprise the substantial part of our business, with approximately 97% of consolidated revenues for the years
ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011. We are a Delaware corporation, building and selling homes at October 31, 2013
in 192 consolidated new home communities in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland,
Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington, D.C., and West
Virginia. We offer a wide variety of homes that are designed to appeal to first-time buyers, first and second-time move-up
buyers, luxury buyers, active adult buyers, and empty nesters. Our financial services operations, which are a reportable
segment, provide mortgage banking and title services to the homebuilding operations’ customers. We do not typically
retain or service the mortgages that we originate but rather sell the mortgages and related servicing rights to investors.
Corporate primarily includes the operations of our corporate office whose primary purpose is to provide executive services,
accounting, information services, human resources, management reporting, training, cash management, internal audit, risk
management, and administration of process redesign, quality, and safety.
See Note 11 “Operating and Reporting Segments” for further disclosure of our reportable segments.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and these differences could have a significant impact on
the financial statements.
Income Recognition from Home and Land Sales - We are primarily engaged in the development, construction,
marketing and sale of residential single-family and multi-family homes where the planned construction cycle is less than
12 months. For these homes, in accordance with ASC 360-20, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Real Estate Sales”,
revenue is recognized when title is conveyed to the buyer, adequate initial and continuing investments have been received
and there is no continued involvement. In situations where the buyer’s financing is originated by our mortgage subsidiary
and the buyer has not made an adequate initial investment or continuing investment as prescribed by ASC 360-20, the
profit on such sales is deferred until the sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor has been completed.
Income Recognition from Mortgage Loans - Our Financial Services segment originates mortgages, primarily for
our homebuilding customers. We use mandatory investor commitments and forward sales of mortgage-backed securities
(MBS) to hedge our mortgage-related interest rate exposure on agency and government loans.
We elected the fair value option for our mortgage loans held for sale in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial
Instruments”, which permits us to measure our loans held for sale at fair value. Management believes that the election of
the fair value option for loans held for sale improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring the fair value of the loans and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to
apply complex hedge accounting provisions.
Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated are sold within a short period of time in the secondary mortgage
market on a servicing released, nonrecourse basis, although the Company remains liable for certain limited representations,
such as fraud, and warranties related to loan sales. Mortgage investors could seek to have us buy back loans or compensate
them from losses incurred on mortgages we have sold based on claims that we breached our limited representations and
warranties. We believe there continues to be an industry-wide issue with the number of purchaser claims in which
72
purchasers purport to have found inaccuracies related to the sellers’ representations and warranties in particular loan sale
agreements. We have established reserves for probable losses.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash represents cash deposited in checking accounts. Cash equivalents include
certificates of deposit, Treasury Bills and government money market funds with maturities of 90 days or less when
purchased. Our cash balances are held at a few financial institutions and may, at times, exceed insurable amounts. We
believe we mitigate this risk by depositing our cash in major financial institutions. At both October 31, 2013 and 2012, we
had no cash equivalents in “Homebuilding: Cash” or “Financial services: Cash” as the full balance of cash and cash
equivalents was held as cash. However, “Homebuilding: Restricted cash and cash equivalents” and “Financial services:
Restricted cash and cash equivalents” both included cash equivalents at October 31, 2013 and 2012.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The fair value of financial instruments is determined by reference to various
market data and other valuation techniques as appropriate. Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, receivables, deposits and notes, accounts payable and other liabilities, customer deposits, mortgage loans
held for sale, nonrecourse and operating properties mortgages, mortgage warehouse lines of credit, accrued interest, and the
senior secured notes, senior notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated amortizing
notes payable. The fair value of the senior secured notes, senior notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes
and senior subordinated amortizing notes payable is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar
issues or on the current rates offered to us for debt of the same remaining maturities.
Inventories - Inventories consist of land, land development, home construction costs, capitalized interest,
construction overhead and property taxes. Construction costs are accumulated during the period of construction and
charged to cost of sales under specific identification methods. Land, land development, and common facility costs are
allocated based on buildable acres to product types within each community, then charged to cost of sales equally based
upon the number of homes to be constructed in each product type.
We record inventories in our consolidated balance sheets at cost unless the inventory is determined to be impaired,
in which case the inventory is written down to its fair value. Our inventories consist of the following three components:
(1) sold and unsold homes and lots under development, which includes all construction, land, capitalized interest, and land
development costs related to started homes and land under development in our active communities; (2) land and land
options held for future development or sale, which includes all costs related to land in our communities in planning or
mothballed communities; and (3) consolidated inventory not owned, which includes all costs related to specific
performance options, variable interest entities, and other options, which consists primarily of model homes financed with
an investor and inventory related to land banking arrangements.
We have decided to mothball (or stop development on) certain communities; we do so when we determine that
current performance does not justify further investment at that time. When we decide to mothball a community, the
inventory is reclassified from "Sold and unsold homes and lots under development" to "Land and land options held for
future development or sale". We regularly review communities to determine if mothballing is appropriate. During fiscal
2013, we mothballed one community, re-activated three previously mothballed communities and sold one mothballed
community. As of October 31, 2013, the net book value of our 50 total mothballed communities was $115.9 million, which
was net of impairment charges recorded in prior periods of $431.6 million.
From time to time we enter into option agreements that include specific performance requirements, whereby we
are required to purchase a minimum number of lots. Because of our obligation to purchase these lots, for accounting
purposes in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, we are required to record this inventory on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. As of October 31, 2013, we had $0.8 million of specific performance options recorded on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets to “Consolidated inventory not owned – specific performance options”, with a corresponding amount recorded to
“Liabilities from inventory not owned”.
“Consolidated inventory not owned – other options” consists of certain model sale leasebacks and land banking
arrangements that were included on our balance sheet in accordance with GAAP. During fiscal 2013, we sold and leased
back certain of our model homes with the right to participate in the potential profit when each home is sold to a third party
at the end of the respective lease. As a result of our continued involvement, for accounting purposes in accordance with
ASC 360-20-40-38, these sale and leaseback transactions are considered a financing rather than a sale. Therefore, for
purposes of our Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $47.6 million was recorded to
“Consolidated inventory not owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $45.7 million recorded to “Liabilities
from inventory not owned”.
73
In addition, we entered into a land banking arrangement in fiscal 2012 with GSO Capital Partners LP ("GSO"),
that continued in fiscal 2013, whereby we sold a portfolio of our land parcels to GSO, and GSO provided us an option to
purchase back finished lots on a quarterly basis. Because of our option to repurchase these parcels, for accounting purposes,
in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, this transaction is considered a financing rather than a sale. For purposes of our
Consolidated Balance Sheet, at October 31, 2013, inventory of $52.4 million was recorded as “Consolidated inventory not
owned – other options”, with a corresponding amount of $41.4 million recorded to “Liabilities from inventory not owned”
for the amount of net cash received from the transactions.
The recoverability of inventories and other long-lived assets is assessed in accordance with the provisions of ASC
360-10, “Property, Plant and Equipment - Overall”. ASC 360-10 requires long-lived assets, including inventories, held for
development to be evaluated for impairment based on undiscounted future cash flows of the assets at the lowest level for
which there are identifiable cash flows. As such, we evaluate inventories for impairment at the individual community level,
the lowest level of discrete cash flows that we measure.
We evaluate inventories of communities under development and held for future development for impairment when
indicators of potential impairment are present. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, decreases in local
housing market values, decreases in gross margins or sales absorption rates, decreases in net sales prices (base sales price
net of sales incentives), or actual or projected operating or cash flow losses. The assessment of communities for indication
of impairment is performed quarterly, primarily by completing detailed budgets for all of our communities and identifying
those communities with a projected operating loss for any projected fiscal year or for the entire projected community life.
For those communities with projected losses, we estimate the remaining undiscounted future cash flows and compare those
to the carrying value of the community, to determine if the carrying value of the asset is recoverable.
The projected operating profits, losses, or cash flows of each community can be significantly impacted by our
estimates of the following:
● future base selling prices;
● future home sales incentives;
● future home construction and land development costs; and
● future sales absorption pace and cancellation rates.
These estimates are dependent upon specific market conditions for each community. While we consider available
information to determine what we believe to be our best estimates as of the end of a quarterly reporting period, these
estimates are subject to change in future reporting periods as facts and circumstances change. Local market-specific
conditions that may impact our estimates for a community include:
● the intensity of competition within a market, including available home sales prices and home sales incentives
offered by our competitors, including foreclosed homes where they have an impact on our ability to sell
homes;
● the current sales absorption pace for both our communities and competitor communities;
● community-specific attributes, such as location, availability of lots in the market, desirability and uniqueness
of our community, and the size and style of homes currently being offered;
● potential for alternative product offerings to respond to local market conditions;
● changes by management in the sales strategy of the community;
● current local market economic and demographic conditions and related trends and forecasts; and
● existing home inventory supplies, including foreclosures and short sales.
These and other local market-specific conditions that may be present are considered by management in preparing
projection assumptions for each community. The sales objectives can differ between our communities, even within a given
market. For example, facts and circumstances in a given community may lead us to price our homes with the objective of
74
yielding a higher sales absorption pace, while facts and circumstances in another community may lead us to price our
homes to minimize deterioration in our gross margins, although it may result in a slower sales absorption pace. In addition,
the key assumptions included in our estimate of future undiscounted cash flows may be interrelated. For example, a
decrease in estimated base sales price or an increase in homes sales incentives may result in a corresponding increase in
sales absorption pace. Additionally, a decrease in the average sales price of homes to be sold and closed in future reporting
periods for one community that has not been generating what management believes to be an adequate sales absorption pace
may impact the estimated cash flow assumptions of a nearby community. Changes in our key assumptions, including
estimated construction and development costs, absorption pace and selling strategies, could materially impact future cash
flow and fair value estimates. Due to the number of possible scenarios that would result from various changes in these
factors, we do not believe it is possible to develop a sensitivity analysis with a level of precision that would be meaningful
to an investor.
If the undiscounted cash flows are more than the carrying amount of the community, then the carrying amount is
recoverable, and no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying
amount, then the community is deemed impaired and is written-down to its fair value. We determine the estimated fair
value of each community by determining the present value of its estimated future cash flows at a discount rate
commensurate with the risk of the respective community, or in limited circumstances, prices for land in recent comparable
sale transactions, market analysis studies, which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other
than in a forced liquidation sale), and recent bona fide offers received from outside third parties. Our discount rates used for
all impairments recorded from October 31, 2011 to October 31, 2013 range from 16.8% to 19.8%. The estimated future
cash flow assumptions are virtually the same for both our recoverability and fair value assessments. Should the estimates or
expectations used in determining estimated cash flows or fair value, including discount rates, decrease or differ from
current estimates in the future, we may be required to recognize additional impairments related to current and future
communities. The impairment of a community is allocated to each lot on a relative fair value basis.
From time to time, we write off deposits and approval, engineering and capitalized interest costs when we
determine that it is no longer probable that we will exercise options to buy land in specific locations or when we redesign
communities and/or abandon certain engineering costs. In deciding not to exercise a land option, we take into consideration
changes in market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the willingness of land sellers to modify terms of the
land option contract (including timing of land takedowns), and the availability and best use of our capital, among other
factors. The write-off is recorded in the period that it is not deemed probable that the optioned property will be acquired. In
certain instances, we have been able to recover deposits and other pre-acquisition costs that were previously written off.
These recoveries have not been significant in comparison to the total costs written off.
Land and land options held for sale includes land parcels on which we have decided not to build homes and are
reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. In determining the fair value of land held for sale,
management considers, among other things, prices for land in recent comparable sale transactions, market analysis studies,
which include the estimated price a willing buyer would pay for the land (other than in a forced liquidation sale) and recent
bona fide offers received from outside third parties. At October 31, 2013, land and land options held for sale had a carrying
value of $2.7 million.
Insurance Deductible Reserves - For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general
liability insurance is $20 million per occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our
deductible per occurrence in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit.
Our aggregate retention in fiscal 2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury
claims. We do not have a deductible on our worker's compensation insurance. Reserves for estimated losses for
construction defects, warranty, bodily injury and worker’s compensation claims have been established using the assistance
of a third-party actuary. We engage a third-party actuary that uses our historical warranty and construction defect data and
worker's compensation data to assist our management in estimating our unpaid claims, claim adjustment expenses and
incurred but not reported claims reserves for the risks that we are assuming under the general liability and worker's
compensation programs. The estimates include provisions for inflation, claims handling and legal fees. These estimates are
subject to a high degree of variability due to uncertainties such as trends in construction defect claims relative to our
markets and the types of products we build, claim settlement patterns, insurance industry practices, and legal
interpretations, among others. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated liability
amounts, actual future costs could differ significantly from our currently estimated amounts.
Interest - Interest attributable to properties under development during the land development and home construction
period is capitalized and expensed along with the associated cost of sales as the related inventories are sold. Interest
75
incurred in excess of interest capitalized, which occurs when assets qualifying for interest capitalization are less than our
outstanding debt balances, is expensed as incurred in “Other interest.”
Interest costs incurred, expensed and capitalized were:
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest capitalized at beginning of year
Plus interest incurred(1)
Less cost of sales interest expensed
Less other interest expensed(2)(3)
Interest capitalized at end of year(4)
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
$116,056
132,611
52,230
91,344
$105,093
2012
$121,441
147,048
54,538
97,895
$116,056
October 31,
2011
$136,288
156,998
74,676
97,169
$121,441
(1) Data does not include interest incurred by our mortgage and finance subsidiaries.
(2) Other interest expensed is comprised of interest that does not qualify for capitalization because our assets that
qualify for interest capitalization (inventory under development) do not exceed our debt. Interest on completed homes
and land in planning which does not qualify for capitalization is expensed.
(3) Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest is the sum of other interest expensed, as defined above, and interest
paid by our mortgage and finance subsidiaries adjusted for the change in accrued interest, which is calculated as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Other interest expensed
Interest paid by our mortgage and finance subsidiaries
(Increase)/decrease in accrued interest
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest
Year Ended
October 31,
October 31,
2013
$91,344
2,975
(8,062)
$86,257
2012
$97,895
2,433
1,132
$101,460
October 31,
2011
$97,169
1,959
2,637
$101,765
(4) Capitalized interest amounts are shown gross before allocating any portion of inventory impairments to capitalized
interest.
Land Options - Costs incurred to obtain options to acquire improved or unimproved home sites are capitalized.
Such amounts are either included as part of the purchase price if the land is acquired or charged to “Inventory impairments
loss and land option write-offs” if we determine we will not exercise the option. If the options are with variable interest
entities and we are the primary beneficiary, we record the land under option on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under
“Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from inventory not owned.” If the option obligation is
to purchase under specific performance or has terms that require us to record it as financing, then we record the option on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Consolidated inventory not owned” with an offset under “Liabilities from
inventory not owned”. In accordance with ASC 810-10 “Consolidation - Overall”, we record costs associated with other
options on the Consolidated Balance Sheets under “Land and land options held for future development or sale.”
Unconsolidated Homebuilding and Land Development Joint Ventures - Investments in unconsolidated
homebuilding and land development joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under the
equity method, we recognize our proportionate share of earnings and losses earned by the joint venture upon the delivery of
lots or homes to third parties. Our ownership interests in the joint ventures vary but our voting interests are generally 50%
or less. In determining whether or not we must consolidate joint ventures where we are the managing member of the joint
venture, we assess whether the other partners have specific rights to overcome the presumption of control by us as the
manager of the joint venture. In most cases, the presumption is overcome because the joint venture agreements require that
both partners agree on establishing the significant operating and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets, in
the ordinary course of business. The evaluation of whether or not we control a venture can require significant judgment. In
accordance with ASC 323-10, “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures - Overall”, we assess our investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures for recoverability, and if it is determined that a loss in value of the investment below its
carrying amount is other than temporary, we write down the investment to its fair value. We evaluate our equity
investments for impairment based on the joint venture’s projected cash flows. This process requires significant
management judgment and estimates. There were no write-downs in fiscal 2011, 2012 or 2013.
76
Deferred Bond Issuance Costs - Costs associated with the issuance of our senior secured, senior, senior
amortizing, senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes are capitalized and amortized over the term of
each note’s issuance.
Debt Issued At a Discount - Debt issued at a discount to the face amount is accreted up to its face amount utilizing
the effective interest method over the term of the note and recorded as a component of interest on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Post Development Completion and Warranty Costs - In those instances where a development is substantially
completed and sold and we have additional construction work to be incurred, an estimated liability is provided to cover the
cost of such work. We accrue for warranty costs that are covered under our existing general liability and construction defect
policy as part of our general liability insurance deductible. This accrual is expensed as selling, general, and administrative
costs. For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per
occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal
2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal
2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. In addition, we establish a
warranty accrual for lower cost-related issues to cover home repairs, community amenities, and land development
infrastructure that are not covered under our general liability and construction defect policy. We accrue an estimate for
these warranty costs as part of cost of sales at the time each home is closed and title and possession have been transferred to
the homebuyer. See Note 17 for additional information on the amount of warranty costs recognized in cost of goods sold
and administrative expenses.
Advertising Costs - Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012,
and 2011, advertising costs expensed totaled to $17.2 million, $18.2 million and $20.3 million, respectively.
Deferred Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts recorded
for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. If the combination of future years’ income (or loss) combined with the
reversal of the timing differences results in a loss, such losses can be carried back to prior years or carried forward to future
years to recover the deferred tax assets. In accordance with ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes - Overall”, we evaluate our
deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740-10 requires that companies assess
whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more-
likely-than-not” standard.
In evaluating the exposures associated with our various tax filing positions, we recognize tax liabilities in
accordance with ASC 740-10, for more likely than not exposures. We re-evaluate the exposures associated with our tax
positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors such as changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax
law, new audit activity, and effectively settled issues. Determining whether an uncertain tax position is effectively settled
requires judgment. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an
additional charge to the tax provision. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter for which we have
established a liability is audited and fully resolved or clarified. We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and
income tax provision in the period in which an uncertain tax position is effectively settled, or the statute of limitations
expires for the relevant taxing authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available. Due to
the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a liability that is materially different
from our current estimate. Any such changes will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period
in which they are determined.
Depreciation - Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the assets ranging from 3 to 40 years.
Prepaid Expenses - Prepaid expenses which relate to specific housing communities (model setup, architectural
fees, homeowner warranty program fees, etc.) are amortized to cost of sales as the applicable inventories are sold. All other
prepaid expenses are amortized over a specific time period or as used and charged to overhead expense.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – We regularly review our receivable balances, which are included in
Receivables, deposits and notes on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for collectability and record an allowance against a
receivable when it is deemed that collectability is uncertain. These receivables include receivables from our insurance
carriers, receivables from municipalities related to the development of utilities or other infrastructure, and other
miscellaneous receivables. At October 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance for allowance for doubtful accounts was $14.7
million and $8.2 million, respectively. The balance at October 31, 2013 primarily related to the allowance for receivables
77
from our insurance carriers for certain warranty claims which may not be fully recoverable, allowances for receivables
from municipalities, an allowance for a receivable for a prior year land sale and an allowance for a receivable related to a
legal settlement. The balance at October 31, 2012 primarily related to the allowance for receivables from municipalities.
During fiscal 2013 and 2012, we recorded $7.4 million and $7.7 million, respectively, of additional reserves and $0.1
million and $0.1 million, respectively, in write-offs. In 2013, we also had $0.8 million in recoveries.
Stock Options - We account for our stock options under ASC 718-10, “Compensation - Stock Compensation -
Overall”, which requires the fair-value based method of accounting for stock awards granted to employees and measures
and records the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date
fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in
exchange for the award.
Compensation cost arising from non-vested stock granted to employees and from nonemployee stock awards is
recognized as expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period.
Per Share Calculations - Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) (the “numerator”)
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock (the
“denominator”) for the period. The basic weighted-average number of shares for the twelve months ended October 31,
2013 includes 6.1 million shares related to Purchase Contracts (issued as part of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units) which
are issuable in the future with no additional cash required to be paid by the holders thereof. This number of shares
represents the minimum number of shares that will, under all circumstances, be issuable upon settlement of the Purchase
Contracts. As discussed in Note 10, the actual number of shares of Class A Common stock we may issue upon settlement
of the Purchase Contracts will be between 4.7655 shares (which is the minimum settlement rate) and 5.8140 shares (which
is the maximum settlement rate) per Purchase Contract (in each case, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) based
on the applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement governing the Purchase Contracts, of our
Class A Common Stock. Computing diluted earnings per share is similar to computing basic earnings per share, except that
the denominator is increased to include the dilutive effects of options and non-vested shares of restricted stock, as well as
common shares that would be issuable upon exchange of our Senior Exchangeable Notes issued as part of our 6.0%
Exchangeable Note Units. Any options that have an exercise price greater than the average market price are considered to
be anti-dilutive and are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation.
All outstanding non-vested shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents that
participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities and are included in
computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula
that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or
dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s restricted common stock
(“nonvested shares”) are considered participating securities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements – As of October 31, 2013, there were no pending accounting pronouncements
applicable to the Company.
4. Leases
We lease certain property under non-cancelable leases. Office leases are generally for terms of three to five years
and generally provide renewal options. Model home leases are generally for shorter terms of approximately one to three
years with renewal options on a month-to-month basis. In most cases, we expect that in the normal course of business,
leases that will expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases. The future lease payments required under operating
leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Years Ending October 31,
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
After 2019
Total
78
(In
Thousands)
$10,631
9,105
7,757
3,310
795
1,438
$33,036
Net rental expense for the three years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $10.8 million, $12.4 million
and $15.3 million, respectively. These amounts include rent expense for various month-to-month leases on model homes,
furniture, and equipment. These amounts also include abandoned lease cost accruals, as well as the amortization of those
accruals over the lease term, for leased space that we have abandoned due to our reduction in size and consolidation of
certain locations. Certain leases contain renewal or purchase options and generally provide that the Company shall pay for
insurance, taxes and maintenance.
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Homebuilding property, plant, and equipment consists of land, land improvements, buildings, building
improvements, furniture, and equipment used to conduct day-to-day business and are recorded at cost less accumulated
depreciation.
Property, plant, and equipment balances as of October 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
(In thousands)
Land
Buildings
Building improvements
Furniture
Equipment
Total
Less accumulated depreciation
Total
6. Restricted Cash and Deposits
October 31,
2013
2012
$2,398
66,859
8,869
6,262
36,998
121,386
75,175
$46,211
$2,398
66,843
9,475
6,272
39,222
124,210
75,686
$48,524
Restricted cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets totaled to $31.9 million and $64.2
million as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which included cash collateralizing our letter of credit agreements
and facilities and is discussed in Note 8. Also included in this balance were homebuilding and financial services customers’
deposits of $5.1 million and $21.6 million at October 31, 2013, respectively, and $4.8 million and $22.5 million as of
October 31, 2012, respectively, which are restricted from use by us. In addition, we previously collateralized our surety
bonds with cash, but as of April 30, 2013 were no longer required to do so. The balance of this surety bond collateral was
$6.2 million at October 31, 2012, which was in cash equivalents, the book value of which approximates fair value.
Total Homebuilding Customers’ deposits are shown as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These
liabilities are significantly more than the applicable periods’ escrow cash balances because, in some states, the deposits are
not restricted from use and, in other states, we are able to release the majority of this escrow cash by pledging letters of
credit and surety bonds.
7. Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Our mortgage banking subsidiary originates mortgage loans, primarily from the sale of our homes. Such mortgage
loans are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time of origination. Mortgage loans held for sale
consist primarily of single-family residential loans collateralized by the underlying property. We have elected the fair value
option to record loans held for sale and therefore these loans are recorded at fair value with the changes in the value
recognized in the Statements of Operations in “Revenues: Financial services.” We currently use forward sales of mortgage-
backed securities, interest rate commitments from borrowers and mandatory and/or best efforts forward commitments to
sell loans to investors to protect us from interest rate fluctuations. These short-term instruments, which do not require any
payments to be made to the counterparty or investor in connection with the execution of the commitments, are recorded at
fair value. Gains and losses on changes in the fair value are recognized in the Statements of Operations in “Revenues:
Financial services.”
At October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, $94.1 million and $104.6 million of mortgages held for sale were
pledged against our mortgage warehouse lines of credit (see Note 8). We may incur losses with respect to mortgages that
were previously sold that are delinquent and which had underwriting defects, but only to the extent the losses are not
79
covered by mortgage insurance or resale value of the home. The reserves for these estimated losses are included in the
"Financial services – Accounts payable and other liabilities" balance on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We received 58
and 66 repurchase or make-whole inquiries during the year ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The activity in our loan origination reserves in fiscal 2013 and 2012 was as follows:
(In thousands)
Loan origination reserves, beginning of period
Provisions for losses during the period
Adjustments to pre-existing provisions for losses from changes in estimates
Payments/settlements
Loan origination reserves, end of period
8. Mortgages and Notes Payable
Year Ended
October 31,
2013
2012
$9,334
3,138
(786)
(650)
$11,036
$5,063
4,060
1,802
(1,591)
$9,334
We have nonrecourse mortgages for a small number of our communities totaling $62.9 million, as well as our
Corporate Headquarters totaling $17.7 million, at October 31, 2013, which are secured by the related real property and any
improvements. These loans have installment obligations with annual principal maturities in the years ending October 31 of
approximately: $63.9 million in 2014, $1.2 million in 2015, $1.3 million in 2016, $1.4 million in 2017, $1.5 million in
2018 and $11.3 million after 2018. The interest rates on these obligations range from 4.0% to 8.8% at October 31, 2013.
In June 2013, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (“K. Hovnanian”), as borrower, and we and certain of our
subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into a five-year $75 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”)
with Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and Citibank, N.A., as a lender. The Credit Facility is
available for both letters of credit and general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility does not contain any financial
maintenance covenants, but does contain certain restrictive covenants that track those contained in our indenture governing
the First Lien Notes (as defined below in Note 9), which are described in Note 9. The Credit Facility also contains certain
customary events of default which would permit the administrative agent at the request of the required lenders to, among
other things, declare all loans then outstanding to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace
periods, including the failure to make timely payments of amounts payable under the Credit Facility or other material
indebtedness or the acceleration of other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and covenants or for
representations or warranties to be correct in all material respects when made, specified events of bankruptcy and
insolvency, and the entry of a material judgment against a loan party. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility
accrue interest at an annual rate equal to either, as selected by K. Hovnanian, (i) the alternate base rate plus the applicable
spread determined on the date of such borrowing or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus the applicable spread determined as of
the date two business days prior to the first day of the interest period for such borrowing. As of October 31, 2013, there
were no borrowings and $25.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility and as of such date, we
believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility.
In addition to the Credit Facility, we have certain stand alone cash collateralized letter of credit agreements and
facilities under which there were a total of $5.1 million and $29.5 million of letters of credit outstanding as of October 31,
2013 and 2012, respectively. These agreements and facilities require us to maintain specified amounts of cash as collateral
in segregated accounts to support the letters of credit issued thereunder, which will affect the amount of cash we have
available for other uses. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount of cash collateral in these segregated accounts was
$5.2 million and $30.7 million, respectively, which is reflected in “Restricted cash and cash equivalents” on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our wholly owned mortgage banking subsidiary, K. Hovnanian American Mortgage, LLC (“K. Hovnanian
Mortgage”), originates mortgage loans primarily from the sale of our homes. Such mortgage loans and related servicing
rights are sold in the secondary mortgage market within a short period of time. In certain instances, we retain the servicing
rights for a small amount of loans. Our secured Master Repurchase Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase
Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on June 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to June 27, 2014, is a
short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages held
for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly on
outstanding advances at an adjusted LIBOR rate, which was 0.168% at October 31, 2013, subject to a floor of 1%, plus the
80
applicable margin of 2.5%. Therefore, at October 31, 2013, the interest rate was 3.5%. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012,
the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Chase Master Repurchase Agreement was $33.6
million and $58.8 million, respectively.
K. Hovnanian Mortgage has another secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Customers Bank (“Customers
Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on May 28, 2013 to extend the maturity date to May 27, 2014, that is
a short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $37.5 million through maturity. The loan is secured by the mortgages
held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable daily or
as loans are sold to permanent investors on outstanding advances at the current LIBOR subject to a floor of 0.5% plus the
applicable margin ranging from 3.0% to 5.5% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013 and
2012, the aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Customers Master Repurchase Agreement
was $30.7 million and $22.9 million, respectively.
K. Hovnanian Mortgage has a third secured Master Repurchase Agreement with Credit Suisse First Boston
Mortgage Capital LLC (“Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement”), which was amended on January 2, 2013, that is a
short-term borrowing facility that provides up to $50.0 million through June 20, 2014. The loan is secured by the mortgages
held for sale and is repaid when we sell the underlying mortgage loans to permanent investors. Interest is payable monthly
on outstanding advances at the Credit Suisse Cost of Funds, which was 0.48% at October 31, 2013, plus the applicable
margin ranging from 3.75% to 4.0% based on the takeout investor and type of loan. As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, the
aggregate principal amount of all borrowings outstanding under the Credit Suisse Master Repurchase Agreement was $27.4
million and $25.8 million, respectively.
The Chase Master Repurchase Agreement, Customers Master Repurchase Agreement and Credit Suisse Master
Repurchase Agreement (together, the “Master Repurchase Agreements”) require K. Hovnanian Mortgage to satisfy and
maintain specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests. Because of the extremely short period of time
mortgages are held by K. Hovnanian Mortgage before the mortgages are sold to investors (generally a period of a few
weeks), the immateriality to us on a consolidated basis of the size of the Master Repurchase Agreements, the levels
required by these financial covenants, our ability based on our immediately available resources to contribute sufficient
capital to cure any default, were such conditions to occur, and our right to cure any conditions of default based on the terms
of the agreement, we do not consider any of these covenants to be substantive or material. As of October 31, 2013, we
believe we were in compliance with the covenants under the Master Repurchase Agreements.
9. Senior Secured, Senior, Senior Amortizing, Senior Exchangeable and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes
Senior Secured, Senior, Senior Amortizing, Senior Exchangeable and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes
balances as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, were as follows:
(In thousands)
Senior Secured Notes:
7.25% Senior Secured First Lien Notes due October 15, 2020
9.125% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due November 15, 2020
2.0% Senior Secured Notes due November 1, 2021 (net of discount)
5.0% Senior Secured Notes due November 1, 2021 (net of discount)
Total Senior Secured Notes
Senior Notes:
6.5% Senior Notes due January 15, 2014
6.375% Senior Notes due December 15, 2014
6.25% Senior Notes due January 15, 2015
11.875% Senior Notes due October 15, 2015 (net of discount)
6.25% Senior Notes due January 15, 2016 (net of discount)
7.5% Senior Notes due May 15, 2016
8.625% Senior Notes due January 15, 2017
Total Senior Notes
11.0% Senior Amortizing Notes due December 1, 2017
Senior Exchangeable Notes due December 1, 2017
7.25% Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes due February 15, 2014
81
Year Ended
October 31,
2013
October 31,
2012
$577,000
220,000
53,119
128,492
$978,611
$-
-
21,438
60,044
172,153
86,532
121,043
$461,210
$20,857
$66,615
$2,152
$577,000
220,000
53,109
127,260
$977,369
$36,649
3,015
21,438
59,716
130,343
86,532
121,043
$458,736
$23,149
$76,851
$6,091
As of October 31, 2013, future maturities of our borrowings (assuming no exchange of our senior exchangeable
notes), were as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Ended October 31,
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter
Total
2013
$5,960
86,491
263,994
126,293
69,459
992,000
$1,544,197
Except for K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (“K. Hovnanian”), the issuer of the notes, our home mortgage
subsidiaries, joint ventures and subsidiaries holding interests in our joint ventures, certain of our title insurance subsidiaries
and our foreign subsidiary, we and each of our subsidiaries are guarantors of the senior secured, senior, senior amortizing,
senior exchangeable and senior subordinated amortizing notes outstanding at October 31, 2013 (see Note 23). In addition,
the 5.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and the 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 are guaranteed by K. Hovnanian JV
Holdings, L.L.C. and its subsidiaries except for certain joint ventures and joint venture holding companies (collectively, the
“Secured Group”). Members of the Secured Group do not guarantee K. Hovnanian's other indebtedness.
The indentures governing the notes do not contain any financial maintenance covenants, but do contain restrictive
covenants that limit, among other things, the Company’s ability and that of certain of its subsidiaries, including K.
Hovnanian, to incur additional indebtedness (other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing indebtedness and non-
recourse indebtedness), pay dividends and make distributions on common and preferred stock, repurchase subordinated
indebtedness (with respect to certain of the senior secured notes), make other restricted payments, make investments, sell
certain assets, incur liens, consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all assets and enter into
certain transactions with affiliates. The indentures also contain events of default which would permit the holders of the
notes to declare the notes to be immediately due and payable if not cured within applicable grace periods, including the
failure to make timely payments on the notes or other material indebtedness, the failure to comply with agreements and
covenants and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency and, with respect to the indentures governing the senior
secured notes, the failure of the documents granting security for the senior secured notes to be in full force and effect and
the failure of the liens on any material portion of the collateral securing the senior secured notes to be valid and perfected.
As of October 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with the covenants of the indentures governing our outstanding
notes.
Under the terms of the indentures, we have the right to make certain redemptions and, depending on market
conditions and covenant restrictions, may do so from time to time. We also continue to evaluate our capital structure and
may also continue to make debt purchases and/or exchanges for debt or equity from time to time through tender offers,
open market purchases, private transactions, or otherwise, or seek to raise additional debt or equity capital, depending on
market conditions and covenant restrictions.
If our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the indentures governing our senior secured and
senior notes (other than the senior exchangeable notes), is less than 2.0 to 1.0, we are restricted from making certain
payments, including dividends, and from incurring indebtedness other than certain permitted indebtedness, refinancing
indebtedness, and non-recourse indebtedness. As a result of this restriction, we are currently restricted from paying
dividends, which are not cumulative, on our 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock. We anticipate we will continue to be
restricted from paying dividends for the foreseeable future. Our inability to pay dividends is in accordance with covenant
restrictions and will not result in a default under our bond indentures or otherwise affect compliance with any of the
covenants contained in the bond indentures.
On November 3, 2003, K. Hovnanian issued $215.0 million 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014. The net proceeds of the
issuance were used for general corporate purposes. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer
discussed below, and pursuant to the terms of the indenture, were subsequently redeemed in full as discussed below.
On March 18, 2004, K. Hovnanian issued $150.0 million 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014. The net proceeds of the
issuance were used to redeem all of our $150.0 million outstanding 9.125% Senior Notes due 2009, which occurred on
82
May 3, 2004, and for general corporate purposes. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer
discussed below, and pursuant to the terms of the indenture, were subsequently redeemed in full, as discussed below.
On November 30, 2004, K. Hovnanian issued $200.0 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2015. The notes are
redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount upon payment of a make-whole price. The
net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay the outstanding balance on our then existing revolving credit facility and
for general corporate purposes. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.
On August 8, 2005, K. Hovnanian issued $300.0 million 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016. The 6.25% Senior Notes
were issued at a discount to yield 6.46% and have been reflected net of the unamortized discount in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount
plus the payment of a make-whole amount. The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay the outstanding balance
under our then existing revolving credit facility as of August 8, 2005, and for general corporate purposes, including
acquisitions. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below. On September 16, 2013,
K. Hovnanian issued $41.6 million of additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 at a price equal to 100% of their principal
amount as discussed below.
On February 27, 2006, K. Hovnanian issued $300.0 million of 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016. The notes are
redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount plus the payment of a make-whole amount.
The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under our then existing revolving
credit facility as of February 27, 2006. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.
On June 12, 2006, K. Hovnanian issued $250.0 million of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017. The notes are
redeemable in whole or in part at our option at 100% of their principal amount plus the payment of a make-whole amount.
The net proceeds of the issuance were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance under our then existing revolving
credit facility as of June 12, 2006. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.
On May 27, 2008, K. Hovnanian issued $600.0 million ($594.4 million net of discount) of 11.5% Senior Secured
Notes due 2013. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a second-priority lien on
substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors to the extent such assets secured obligations
under the then existing 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016. A portion of the net proceeds of the issuance were used to
repay the outstanding balance under the then existing amended credit facility. These second lien notes were the subject of
tender offers, and notes that remained outstanding following such tender offers were subsequently redeemed, as discussed
below.
On December 3, 2008, K. Hovnanian issued $29.3 million of 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 in exchange
for $71.4 million of various series of our unsecured senior notes. This exchange resulted in a recognized gain on
extinguishment of debt of $41.3 million, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The notes were secured,
subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a third-priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us,
K. Hovnanian, and the guarantors to the extent such assets secured obligations under our then existing 10.625% Senior
Secured Notes due 2016 and 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013. These third lien notes were the subject of tender
offers, and notes that remained outstanding following such tender offers were subsequently redeemed, as discussed below.
On October 20, 2009, K. Hovnanian issued $785.0 million ($770.9 million net of discount) of 10.625% Senior
Secured Notes due October 15, 2016. The notes were secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by a first-
priority lien on substantially all of the assets owned by us, K. Hovnanian and the guarantors. The net proceeds from this
issuance, together with cash on hand, were used to fund certain cash tender offers for our then outstanding 11.5% Senior
Secured Notes due 2013 and 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 and certain series of our unsecured notes. In May 2011,
we issued $12.0 million of additional 10.625% Senior Secured Notes as discussed below. The 10.625% Senior Secured
Notes due 2016 were the subject of a tender offer in October 2012, and the notes that were not tendered in the tender offer
were redeemed, as discussed below.
On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued $155.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes
due 2015. The notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time at 100% of their principal amount plus an
applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the
11.875% Senior Notes prior to April 15, 2014 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 111.875% of
principal. These notes were the subject of a November 2011 exchange offer discussed below.
83
The net proceeds from the issuances of the 11.875% Senior Notes due in 2015, Class A Common Stock (see Note
15) and 7.25% Tangible Equity Units (see Note 10) were approximately $286.2 million, a portion of which were used to
fund the purchase through tender offers, on February 14, 2011, of the following series of K. Hovnanian’s then outstanding
senior and senior subordinated notes: approximately $24.6 million aggregate principal amount of 8.0% Senior Notes due
2012, $44.1 million aggregate principal amount of 8.875% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 and $29.2 million
aggregate principal amount of 7.75% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Notes” and, together with the 2012
Senior Notes and the 2012 Senior Subordinated Notes, the “Tender Offer Notes”). On February 14, 2011, K. Hovnanian
called for redemption on March 15, 2011 all Tender Offer Notes that were not tendered in the tender offers for an aggregate
redemption price of approximately $60.1 million. Such redemptions were funded with proceeds from the offerings of the
Class A Common Stock, the Tangible Equity Units and the 11.875% Senior Notes.
On May 4, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $12.0 million of additional 10.625%
Senior Secured Notes due 2016 resulting in net proceeds of approximately $11.6 million. On June 3, 2011 we used these
net proceeds together with cash on hand, to fund the redemption of the remaining outstanding principal amount ($0.5
million) of our 11.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 and the remaining outstanding principal amount ($11.7 million) of
our 18.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2017. These transactions, along with the tender offers and redemptions in February
and March 2011 discussed above, resulted in a loss of $3.1 million during the year ended October 31, 2011. The losses
from the transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”
During the three months ended October 31, 2011 we completed a number of open market repurchases. These
included $24.6 million principal amount of 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015 and $1.0 million principal amount of 6.5%
Senior Notes due 2014. The aggregate purchase price for these repurchases was $14.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $10.6 million, net of the write-off of
unamortized discounts and fees. The gains from the repurchases are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations
as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt”.
On November 1, 2011, K. Hovnanian issued $141.8 million aggregate principal amount of 5.0% Senior Secured
Notes due 2021 (the “5.0% 2021 Notes”) and $53.2 million aggregate principal amount of 2.0% Senior Secured Notes due
2021 (the “2.0% 2021 Notes” and, together with the 5.0% 2021 Notes, the “2021 Notes”) in exchange for $195.0 million
of K. Hovnanian's unsecured senior notes with maturities ranging from 2014 through 2017. Holders of the senior notes due
2014 and 2015 that were exchanged in the exchange offer also received an aggregate of approximately $14.2 million in
cash payments and all holders of senior notes that were exchanged in the exchange offer received accrued and unpaid
interest (in the aggregate amount of approximately $3.3 million). Costs associated with this transaction were $4.7
million. The 5.0% 2021 Notes and the 2.0% 2021 Notes were issued as separate series under an indenture, but have
substantially the same terms other than with respect to interest rate and related redemption provisions, and vote together as
a single class. The 2021 Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time, at 100.0% of the principal
amount plus the greater of 1% of the principal amount and an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” In addition, we may
redeem up to 35.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes before November 1, 2014 with the net cash proceeds
from certain equity offerings at 105.0% (in the case of the 5.0% Secured Notes) and 102.0% (in the case of the 2.0%
Secured Notes) of principal. Due to the then existing financial condition of K. Hovnanian as determined in accordance with
ASC 470-60 “Accounting by Debtors and Creditors for Troubled Debt Restructurings” and, because the holders of the
senior notes that exchanged such notes for 2021 Notes granted K. Hovnanian a concession in the form of extended
maturities and reduced interest rates, the accounting for the debt exchange was treated as a troubled debt restructuring.
Under this accounting, the Company did not recognize any gain or loss on extinguishment of debt and the costs associated
with the debt exchange were expensed as incurred in “Other operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The guarantees with respect to the 2021 Notes of the Secured Group are secured, subject to permitted liens and
other exceptions, by a first-priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the members of the Secured Group. As
of October 31, 2013, the collateral securing the guarantees included (1) $72.9 million of cash and cash equivalents
(subsequent to such date, cash uses include general business operations and real estate and other investments); (2)
approximately $74.4 million aggregate book value of real property of the Secured Group, which does not include the
impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were
appraised, and (3) equity interests in guarantors that are members of the Secured Group. Members of the Secured Group
also own equity in joint ventures, either directly or indirectly through ownership of joint venture holding companies, with a
book value of $44.1 million as of October 31, 2013; this equity is not pledged to secure, and is not collateral for, the 2021
Notes. Members of the Secured Group are “unrestricted subsidiaries” under K. Hovnanian's other senior notes, senior
secured notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes, and thus have not guaranteed such indebtedness.
84
In addition, on November 1, 2011, K. Hovnanian entered into a Second Supplemental Indenture (the “11.875%
Notes Supplemental Indenture”), among K. Hovnanian, the Company, as guarantor, the other guarantors party thereto and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, amending and supplementing the Indenture dated February 14, 2011 (the “Base
Indenture”) by and among K. Hovnanian, the Company, as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, as
amended by the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 14, 2011 (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), by and
among K. Hovnanian, the Company, as guarantor, the other guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust Company, as
trustee (the Base Indenture as amended by the First Supplemental Indenture, the “Existing Indenture”). The 11.875% Notes
Supplemental Indenture was executed and delivered following the receipt by K. Hovnanian of consents from a majority of
the holders of K. Hovnanian’s 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The 11.875% Notes Supplemental Indenture provides for
the elimination of substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain of the default provisions contained in the Existing
Indenture and the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015.
On October 2, 2012, K. Hovnanian issued $577.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% senior secured first
lien notes due 2020 (the "First Lien Notes") and $220.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.125% senior secured
second lien notes due 2020 (the "Second Lien Notes" and, together with the First Lien Notes, the "2020 Secured Notes") in
a private placement (the "2020 Secured Notes Offering"). The net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering, together
with the net proceeds of the Units offering discussed below, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and
consent solicitation with respect to the Company’s then outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and the
redemption of the remaining notes that were not purchased in the tender offer as described below.
The First Lien Notes are secured by a first-priority lien and the Second Lien Notes are secured by a second-
priority lien, in each case, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, on substantially all the assets owned by us, K.
Hovnanian and the guarantors of such notes. At October 31, 2013, the aggregate book value of the real property that
constituted collateral securing the 2020 Secured Notes was approximately $526.0 million, which does not include the
impact of inventory investments, home deliveries, or impairments thereafter and which may differ from the value if it were
appraised. In addition, cash collateral that secured the 2020 Secured Notes was $251.5 million as of October 31, 2013,
which included $5.2 million of restricted cash collateralizing certain letters of credit. Subsequent to such date, cash uses
include general business operations and real estate and other investments.
The First Lien Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time prior to October 15, 2015 at
100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of the First
Lien Notes at 105.438% of principal commencing October 15, 2015, at 103.625% of principal commencing October 15,
2016, at 101.813% of principal commencing October 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing October 15, 2018. In
addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the First Lien Notes prior to October 15, 2015
with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 107.25% of principal.
The Second Lien Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time prior to November 15, 2015 at
100% of the principal amount plus an applicable “Make-Whole Amount.” We may also redeem some or all of all of the
Second Lien Notes at 106.844% of principal commencing November 15, 2015, at 104.563% of principal commencing
November 15, 2016, at 102.281% of principal commencing November 15, 2017 and 100% of principal commencing
November 15, 2018. In addition, we may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Second Lien Notes
prior to November 15, 2015 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at 109.125% of principal.
Also on October 2, 2012, the Company and K. Hovnanian issued $100,000,000 aggregate stated amount of 6.0%
Exchangeable Note Units (the “Units”) (equivalent to 100,000 Units). Each $1,000 stated amount of Units initially consists
of (1) a zero coupon senior exchangeable note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Exchangeable Note”) issued by K.
Hovnanian, which bears no cash interest and has an initial principal amount of $768.51 per Senior Exchangeable Note, and
that will accrete to $1,000 at maturity and (2) a senior amortizing note due December 1, 2017 (a “Senior Amortizing Note”)
issued by K. Hovnanian, which has an initial principal amount of $231.49 per Senior Amortizing Note, bears interest at a
rate of 11.0% per annum, and has a final installment payment date of December 1, 2017. Each Unit may be separated into
its constituent Senior Exchangeable Note and Senior Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the Units, and the
separate components may be combined to create a Unit.
Each Senior Exchangeable Note had an initial principal amount of $768.51 (which will accrete to $1,000 over the
term of the Senior Exchangeable Note at an annual rate of 5.17% from the date of issuance, calculated on a semi-annual
bond equivalent yield basis). Holders may exchange their Senior Exchangeable Notes at their option at any time prior to
5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the business day immediately preceding December 1, 2017. Each Senior Exchangeable
Note will be exchangeable for shares of Class A Common Stock at an initial exchange rate of 185.5288 shares of Class A
Common Stock per Senior Exchangeable Note (equivalent to an initial exchange price, based on $1,000 principal amount at
85
maturity, of approximately $5.39 per share of Class A Common Stock). The exchange rate will be subject to adjustment in
certain events. Following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, the Company will increase the
applicable exchange rate for any holder who elects to exchange its Senior Exchangeable Notes in connection with such
corporate event. In addition, holders of Senior Exchangeable Notes will also have the right to require K. Hovnanian to
repurchase such holders’ Senior Exchangeable Notes upon the occurrence of certain of these corporate events. As of
October 31, 2013, 18,305 Senior Exchangeable Notes have been converted into 3.4 million shares of our Class A Common
Stock, all of which were converted during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
On each June 1 and December 1 (each, an “installment payment date”), K. Hovnanian will pay holders of Senior
Amortizing Notes equal semi-annual cash installments of $30.00 per Senior Amortizing Note (except for the June 1, 2013
installment payment, which was $39.83 per Senior Amortizing Note), which cash payment in the aggregate will be
equivalent to 6.0% per year with respect to each $1,000 stated amount of Units. Each installment will constitute a payment
of interest (at a rate of 11.0% per annum) and a partial repayment of principal on the Senior Amortizing Note. Following
certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, holders of the Senior Amortizing Notes will have the right to
require K. Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Amortizing Notes.
The net proceeds of the Units Offering, along with the net proceeds from the 2020 Secured Notes Offering
previously discussed, and cash on hand, were used to fund the tender offer and consent solicitation with respect to the
Company’s then outstanding 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 and redemption of the remaining notes that were not
purchased in the tender offer as described below.
On October 2, 2012, pursuant to a cash tender offer and consent solicitation, we purchased in a fixed-price tender
offer approximately $637.2 million aggregate principal amount of 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016 for
approximately $691.3 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Subsequently, all 10.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2016
that were not tendered in the tender offer (approximately $159.8 million) were redeemed for an aggregate redemption price
of approximately $181.8 million. The tender offer and redemption resulted in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $87.0
million, including the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The loss is included in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”
During the year ended October 31, 2012, we repurchased for cash in the open market and privately negotiated
transactions $21.0 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $61.1 million principal amount of our
7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $37.4 million principal amount of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 and $2.0 million
principal amount of our 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015. The aggregate purchase price for these repurchases was $72.2
million, plus accrued and unpaid interest. These repurchases resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $48.4 million
for the year ended October 31, 2012, net of the write-off of unamortized discounts and fees. The gain is included in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.” Certain of these repurchases were
funded with the proceeds from our April 11, 2012 issuance of 25,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock (see Note
15).
In addition, during the year ended October 31, 2012, pursuant to agreements with bondholders we exchanged
$7.8 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $4.0 million principal amount of our 7.5% Senior
Notes due 2016 and $18.3 million of our outstanding 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 for shares of our Class A Common
Stock, as discussed in Note 15. These transactions were treated as a substantial modification of debt, resulting in a gain on
extinguishment of debt of $9.3 million for the year ended October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations as “(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt.”
On September 16, 2013, K. Hovnanian issued an aggregate principal amount of $41.6 million of its 6.25% Senior
Notes due 2016. The Notes were issued as additional 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016 under the indenture dated as of August
8, 2005. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund the redemption on October 15, 2013 of all of K.
Hovnanian’s outstanding 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and to pay related fees and
expenses.
10. Tangible Equity Units
On February 9, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 3,000,000 7.25% Tangible Equity Units (the “TEUs”), and on
February 14, 2011, we issued an additional 450,000 TEUs pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the
underwriters. Each TEU initially consists of (i) a prepaid stock purchase contract (each a “Purchase Contract”) and (ii) a
senior subordinated amortizing note due February 15, 2014 (each, a “Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note”). As of
October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had an aggregate principal amount of $2.2 million and $6.1 million, respectively, of Senior
86
Subordinated Amortizing Notes outstanding. On each February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15, K. Hovnanian
will pay holders of Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes equal quarterly cash installments of $0.453125 per Senior
Subordinated Amortizing Note, which cash payments in the aggregate will be equivalent to 7.25% per year with respect to
each $25 stated amount of TEUs. Each installment constitutes a payment of interest (at a rate of 12.072% per annum) and a
partial repayment of principal on the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, allocated as set forth in the amortization
schedule provided in the indenture under which the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes were issued. The Senior
Subordinated Amortizing Notes have a scheduled final installment payment date of February 15, 2014. If we elect to settle
the Purchase Contracts early, holders of the Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes will have the right to require K.
Hovnanian to repurchase such holders’ Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes, except in certain circumstances as
described in the indenture governing Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes.
Unless settled earlier, on February 15, 2014 (subject to postponement under certain circumstances), each
Purchase Contract will automatically settle and we will deliver a number of shares of Class A Common Stock based on the
applicable market value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement, which will be between 4.7655 shares and 5.8140
shares per Purchase Contract (subject to adjustment). Each TEU may be separated into its constituent Purchase Contract
and Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note after the initial issuance date of the TEUs, and the separate components may be
combined to create a TEU. The Senior Subordinated Amortizing Note component of the TEUs is recorded as debt, and the
Purchase Contract component of the TEUs is recorded in equity as additional paid in capital. We have recorded $68.1
million, the initial fair value of the Purchase Contracts, as additional paid in capital. As of October 31, 2013, 2.2
million Purchase Contracts have been converted into 10.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we purchased pursuant to agreements with bondholders $3.1 million
aggregate principal amount of our Senior Subordinated Amortizing Notes in exchange for Class A Common Stock, as
discussed in Note 15. These transactions resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $0.2 million for the year ended
October 31, 2012. The gain is included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Gain on extinguishment of debt.”
11. Operating and Reporting Segments
Our operating segments are components of our business for which discrete financial information is available and
reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision maker, our Chief Executive Officer, to evaluate performance and make
operating decisions. Based on this criteria, each of our communities qualifies as an operating segment, and therefore, it is
impractical to provide segment disclosures for this many segments. As such, we have aggregated the homebuilding
operating segments into six reportable segments.
Our homebuilding operating segments are aggregated into reportable segments based primarily upon geographic
proximity, similar regulatory environments, land acquisition characteristics and similar methods used to construct and sell
homes. Our reportable segments consist of the following six homebuilding segments and a financial services segment:
Homebuilding:
(1) Northeast (New Jersey and Pennsylvania)
(2) Mid-Atlantic (Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C. , and West Virginia)
(3) Midwest (Illinois, Minnesota, and Ohio)
(4) Southeast (Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina)
(5) Southwest (Arizona and Texas)
(6) West (California)
Financial Services
Operations of the Company’s Homebuilding segments primarily include the sale and construction of single-
family attached and detached homes, attached townhomes and condominiums, urban infill and active adult homes in
planned residential developments. In addition, from time to time, operations of the homebuilding segments include sales of
land. Operations of the Company’s Financial Services segment include mortgage banking and title services provided to the
homebuilding operations’ customers. We do not typically retain or service mortgages that we originate but rather sell the
mortgages and related servicing rights to investors.
Corporate and unallocated primarily represents operations at our headquarters in Red Bank, New Jersey. This
includes our executive offices, information services, human resources, corporate accounting, training, treasury, process
redesign, internal audit, construction services, and administration of insurance, quality, and safety. It also includes interest
87
income and interest expense resulting from interest incurred that cannot be capitalized in inventory in the Homebuilding
segments, as well as the gains or losses on extinguishment of debt from debt repurchases or exchanges.
Evaluation of segment performance is based primarily on operating earnings from continuing operations before
provision for income taxes (“Income (loss) before income taxes”). Income (loss) before income taxes for the
Homebuilding segments consist of revenues generated from the sales of homes and land, income (loss) from
unconsolidated entities, management fees and other income, less the cost of homes and land sold, selling, general and
administrative expenses, interest expense and non-controlling interest expense. Income before income taxes for the
Financial Services segment consist of revenues generated from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services,
less the cost of such services and certain selling, general and administrative expenses incurred by the Financial Services
segment.
Operational results of each segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have occurred had the
segment been an independent stand-alone entity during the periods presented.
Financial information relating to operations of our segments was as follows:
(In thousands)
Revenues:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Financial services
Corporate and unallocated
Total revenues
Income (loss) before income taxes:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Financial services
Corporate and unallocated
Income (loss) before income taxes
(In thousands)
Assets:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Financial services
Corporate and unallocated
Total assets
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$282,855
289,303
163,485
147,570
697,358
223,086
1,803,657
47,727
(131)
$1,851,253
$1,519
24,388
12,270
6,455
76,459
14,398
135,489
18,668
(132,222)
$21,935
$233,326
273,080
106,719
128,684
518,931
185,851
1,446,591
38,735
27
$1,485,353
$(4,683 )
17,262
253
(4,828 )
42,178
(3,177 )
47,005
15,087
(163,340 )
$(101,248 )
$201,984
199,716
70,567
79,453
425,152
128,658
1,105,530
29,481
(104)
$1,134,907
$(99,276)
(17,286)
(8,977)
(11,874)
29,316
(40,599)
(148,696)
8,109
(151,001)
$(291,588)
October 31,
2013
2012
$323,152
240,486
104,596
101,410
305,878
130,545
1,206,067
148,853
404,210
$1,759,130
$396,073
200,969
73,305
90,132
235,367
143,851
1,139,697
164,634
379,919
$1,684,250
88
(In thousands)
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Corporate and unallocated
Total investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures
(In thousands)
Homebuilding interest expense:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Corporate and unallocated
Financial services interest expense (1)
Total interest expense, net
October 31,
2013
2012
$8,828
33,052
1,661
3,412
-
3,921
50,874
564
$51,438
$18,954
32,014
2,190
4,636
-
2,490
60,284
799
$61,083
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$26,163
10,037
3,737
5,861
16,071
12,960
74,829
68,745
499
$144,073
$25,507
9,988
2,994
5,310
15,880
14,416
74,095
78,338
553
$152,986
$33,833
10,180
2,441
4,036
14,552
10,264
75,306
96,539
350
$172,195
(1) Financial services interest expenses are included in the Financial services lines on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations in the respective revenues and expenses sections.
(In thousands)
Depreciation:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Financial services
Corporate and unallocated
Total depreciation
(In thousands)
Net additions to operating properties and equipment:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total homebuilding
Financial services
Corporate and unallocated
Total net additions to operating properties and equipment
89
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$245
283
528
31
163
148
1,398
285
3,029
$4,712
$316
370
517
47
217
302
1,769
328
4,126
$6,223
$677
437
1,825
132
292
409
3,772
391
5,177
$9,340
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$388
35
279
7
44
19
772
6
780
$1,558
$2,944
55
218
30
-
-
3,247
21
1,791
$5,059
$191
19
66
34
28
118
456
74
296
$826
(In thousands)
Equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated joint ventures:
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total equity in earnings (losses) from unconsolidated joint ventures
12. Income Taxes
Income taxes payable consists of the following:
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$3,738
5,631
1,045
1,287
-
339
$12,040
$3,202 $
155
598
1,503
-
(57 )
$5,401
(4,474)
(4,340)
672
676
83
(1,575)
$(8,958)
(In thousands)
State income taxes:
Current
Deferred
Federal income taxes:
Current
Deferred
Total
Year Ended October 31,
2013
$3,301
-
-
-
$3,301
2012
$940
-
5,942
-
$6,882
The provision for income taxes is composed of the following charges (benefits):
(In thousands)
Current income tax (benefit) expense:
Federal
State (1)
Total current income tax (benefit):
Total deferred income tax (benefit):
Total
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
2011
$(9,878)
518
(9,360)
-
$(9,360)
$277
(35,328 )
(35,051 )
-
$(35,051 )
$(1,577)
(3,924)
(5,501)
-
$(5,501)
(1) The current state income tax expense (benefit) is net of the use of state net operating losses totaling $23.1 million, $3.4
million, and $0.5 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
The total income tax benefit of $9.4 million recognized for the twelve months ended October 31, 2013 was
primarily due to the release of reserves for a federal tax position that was settled with the Internal Revenue Service and a
favorable state tax audit settlement, partially offset by state tax expenses and state tax reserves for uncertain state tax
positions. The total income tax benefit was $35.1 million for the twelve months ended October 31, 2012 primarily due to
the elimination of reserves for uncertain state tax positions consistent with past practices and precedents of the relevant
taxing authorities in their dealings with the Company, offset slightly by state tax expenses. The total income tax benefit was
$5.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in tax reserves for uncertain tax positions.
In accordance with ASC 740, we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances
are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the
consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. Because of the downturn in the
homebuilding industry, resulting in significant inventory and intangible impairments in prior years, we are in a three-year
cumulative loss position as of October 31, 2013. According to ASC 740, a three-year cumulative loss is significant negative
evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable, and in this circumstance, the Company does not rely on
projections of future income to support the recovery of deferred tax assets. Therefore, we have valuation allowances for the
full amount of our deferred tax assets as of October 31, 2013 and 2012.
90
During 2013, the valuation allowance decreased by $10.8 million against our deferred tax assets. Our valuation
allowance decreased to $927.1 million at October 31, 2013 from $937.9 million at October 31, 2012 primarily due to a
decrease in deferred tax assets offset by additional valuation allowance recorded for the federal and state tax benefits
related to the tax losses incurred during this period. Our state net operating losses of approximately $2.3 billion expire
between 2014 and 2033. Our federal net operating losses of $1.5 billion expire between 2028 and 2033.
The deferred tax assets and liabilities have been recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Depreciation
Inventory impairment loss
Uniform capitalization of overhead
Warranty and legal reserves
Deferred income
Acquisition intangibles
Restricted stock bonus
Rent on abandoned space
Stock options
Provision for losses
Joint venture loss
Federal net operating losses
State net operating losses
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Acquisition intangibles
Debt repurchase income
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Valuation allowance
Net deferred income taxes
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
$2,345
230,553
6,208
15,571
551
22,523
5,781
3,591
6,994
38,923
5,360
542,409
182,940
16,350
1,080,099
351
152,450
164
152,965
(927,134 )
$-
$1,870
255,996
6,046
16,320
1,173
27,598
5,830
5,318
5,831
32,647
12,496
528,117
180,184
11,362
1,090,788
296
152,414
197
152,907
(937,881)
$-
The effective tax rate varied from the statutory federal income tax rate. The effective tax rate is affected by a
number of factors, the most significant of which is the valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets. The
sources of these factors were as follows:
Computed “expected” tax rate
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit
Permanent differences, net
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance impact
Tax contingencies
Adjustments to prior years’ tax accruals
Effective tax rate
Year Ended October 31,
2013
35.0%
14.0
11.3
(66.2)
(36.8)
-
(42.7)%
2012
35.0%
(2.6)
(0.3)
(32.3)
34.8
-
34.6%
2011
35.0%
(0.1)
(1.2)
(25.8)
(3.2)
(2.8)
1.9%
ASC 740-10 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits.
Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be
recognized upon the adoption of ASC 740-10 and in subsequent periods. This interpretation also provides guidance on
measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
We recognize tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740-10 and we adjust these liabilities when our judgment
changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these
91
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a liability that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax
liabilities. These differences will be reflected as increases or decreases to income tax expense in the period in which they
are determined.
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the income tax expense line in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax
liability line in the consolidated balance sheet.
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year (in millions)
excluding interest and penalties:
Unrecognized tax benefit—November 1,
Gross increases—tax positions in current period
Decrease related to tax positions taken during a prior period
Lapse of statute of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefit—October 31,
2013
$9.9
1.2
(9.3 )
-
$1.8
2012
$26.8
0.6
(16.2)
(1.3)
$9.9
Related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, we have recognized a
liability for interest and penalties of $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. For the years ended October 31, 2013,
2012 and 2011, we recognized $0.1 million, $(18.3) million and $(2.0) million, respectively, of interest and penalties in
income tax benefit.
It is likely that, within the next twelve months, the amount of the Company's unrecognized tax benefits will
decrease by approximately $0.3 million, excluding penalties and interest. This reduction is expected primarily due to the
expiration of the statutes of limitation. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the
Company’s effective tax rate (excluding any related impact to the valuation allowance) is $1.2 million and $9.9 million as
of October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The recognition of unrecognized tax benefits could have an impact on the
Company’s deferred tax assets and the valuation allowance.
There is an open federal audit for the year ended October 31, 2012. We are also subject to various income tax
examinations in the states in which we do business. The outcome for a particular audit cannot be determined with certainty
prior to the conclusion of the audit, appeal, and in some cases, litigation process. As each audit is concluded, adjustments, if
any, are appropriately recorded in the period determined. To provide for potential exposures, tax reserves are recorded, if
applicable, based on reasonable estimates of potential audit results. However, if the reserves are insufficient upon
completion of an audit, there could be an adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations. The statute of
limitations for our major tax jurisdictions remains open for examination for tax years 2009 – 2012.
13. Reduction of Inventory to Fair Value
We record impairment losses on inventories related to communities under development and held for future
development when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated
to be generated by those assets are less than their related carrying amounts. If the expected undiscounted cash flows are less
than the carrying amount, then the community is written down to its fair value. We estimate the fair value of each impaired
community by determining the present value of the estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate with the
risk of the respective community. For the year ended October 31, 2013, our discount rates used for the impairments
recorded ranged from 18.0% to 19.3%. Should the estimates or expectations used in determining cash flows or fair value
decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may need to recognize additional impairments.
During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we evaluated inventories of all 388 and 331 communities
under development and held for future development, respectively, for impairment indicators through preparation and
review of detailed budgets or other market indicators of impairment. We performed detailed impairment calculations during
the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 for 33 and 54 of those communities (i.e., those with a projected operating loss
or other impairment indicators), respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of $85.0 million and $77.7 million,
respectively, (8 and 31 were in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and 2012, respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of
$21.8 million and $47.4 million, respectively). As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the
communities evaluated during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 were evaluated in more than one quarterly
period. Of those communities tested for impairment during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, four and 17
92
communities, respectively, with an aggregate carrying value of $4.5 million and $31.6 million, respectively, had
undiscounted future cash flows that only exceeded the carrying amount by less than 20%. As a result of our impairment
analysis, we recorded impairment losses, which are included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and deducted
from inventory, of $2.4 million, $9.8 million, and $77.5 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011,
respectively.
The following table represents impairments by segment for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011:
(Dollars in millions)
Year Ended October 31, 2013
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
Number of
Communities
4
1
-
1
-
-
6
Dollar
Amount of
Impairment(2)
$2.4
-
-
-
-
-
$2.4
Pre-
Impairment
Value (1)
$7.7
0.1
-
0.4
-
-
$8.2
Year Ended October 31, 2012
Number of
Communities
10
3
2
12
-
5
32
Dollar
Amount of
Impairment
$2.8
0.4
1.6
2.8
-
2.2
$9.8
Pre-
Impairment
Value (1)
$19.6
0.8
4.5
8.3
-
4.9
$38.1
Year Ended October 31, 2011
Number of
Communities
11
5
7
11
1
6
41
Dollar
Amount of
Impairment
$54.9
3.4
1.1
1.5
0.1
16.5
$77.5
Pre-
Impairment
Value (1)
$179.9
17.3
4.2
5.1
0.3
45.2
$252.0
(1) Represents carrying value, net of prior period impairments, if any, at the time of recording the applicable period’s
impairments.
(2) During year ended October 31, 2013, the Mid-Atlantic had an impairment totaling $2 thousand and the Southeast had
an impairment totaling $17 thousand.
The Consolidated Statements of Operations line entitled “Homebuilding-Inventory impairment loss and land
option write-offs” also includes write-offs of options and approval, engineering and capitalized interest costs that we record
when we redesign communities and/or abandon certain engineering costs and we do not exercise options in various
locations because the communities’ pro forma profitability is not projected to produce adequate returns on investment
commensurate with the risk. The total aggregate write-offs were $2.6 million, $2.7 million, and $24.3 million for the years
ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Occasionally, these write-offs are offset by recovered deposits
93
(sometimes through legal action) that had been written off in a prior period as walk-away costs. Historically, these
recoveries have not been significant in comparison to the total costs written off.
The following table represents write-offs of such costs by segment for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011:
(In millions)
Northeast
Mid-Atlantic
Midwest
Southeast
Southwest
West
Total
14. Per Share Calculations
Year Ended October 31,
2013
$0.7
0.1
0.2
0.2
1.4
-
$2.6
2012
$0.7
0.6
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.1
$2.7
2011
$13.4
6.1
0.5
0.8
0.4
3.1
$24.3
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) (the “numerator”) by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock (the “denominator”) for the
period. The basic weighted-average number of shares for the twelve months ended October 31, 2013 includes 6.1 million
shares related to Purchase Contracts (issued as part of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units) which are issuable in the
future with no additional cash required to be paid by the holders thereof. This number of shares represents the minimum
number of shares that will, under all circumstances, be issuable upon settlement of the Purchase Contracts. As discussed in
Note 10, the actual number of shares of Class A Common stock we may issue upon settlement of the Purchase Contracts
will be between 4.7655 shares (which is the minimum settlement rate) and 5.8140 shares (which is the maximum settlement
rate) per Purchase Contract (in each case, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments) based on the applicable market
value, as defined in the purchase contract agreement governing the Purchase Contracts, of our Class A Common Stock.
Computing diluted earnings per share is similar to computing basic earnings per share, except that the denominator is
increased to include the dilutive effects of options and non-vested shares of restricted stock, as well as common shares
issuable upon exchange of our Senior Exchangeable Notes issued as part of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units. Any
options that have an exercise price greater than the average market price are considered to be anti-dilutive and are excluded
from the diluted earnings per share calculation.
All outstanding non-vested shares that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents that
participate in undistributed earnings with common stock are considered participating securities and are included in
computing earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula
that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating securities according to dividends or
dividend equivalents and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s restricted common stock
(“nonvested shares”) are considered participating securities.
94
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented below were calculated as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Hovnanian
Less: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares
Numerator for basic earnings per share
Plus: undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested shares
Less: undistributed earnings reallocated to nonvested
shares
Plus: interest on senior exchangeable notes
Numerator for diluted earnings per share
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share based payments
Senior exchangeable notes
Denominator for diluted earnings per share – weighted
average shares outstanding
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
2013
Year Ended October 31,
2012
2011
$31,295
(58)
$31,237
58
(59)
3,720
$34,956
$(66,197)
$(286,087)
$(66,197)
-
-
-
$(66,197)
$(286,087)
-
-
-
$(286,087)
145,087
126,350
100,444
1,396
15,846
162,329
$0.22
$0.22
-
-
126,350
$(0.52)
$(0.52)
-
-
100,444
$(2.85)
$(2.85)
Incremental shares attributed to non-vested stock and outstanding options to purchase common stock of 0.2
million and 0.3 million for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were excluded from the computation
of diluted earnings per share because we had a net loss for the period, and any incremental shares would not be dilutive.
Also, for the year ended October 31, 2012, 18.6 million shares of common stock issuable upon the exchange of our senior
exchangeable notes (which were issued in fiscal 2012) were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
because we had a net loss for the period.
In addition, shares related to out-of-the money stock options that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share
in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share were 2.2 million, 2.5 million and 5.1
million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive
for the periods presented.
15. Capital Stock
Common Stock - Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles its holder to one vote per share, and each share of
Class B Common Stock generally entitles its holder to ten votes per share. The amount of any regular cash dividend
payable on a share of Class A Common Stock will be an amount equal to 110% of the corresponding regular cash dividend
payable on a share of Class B Common Stock. If a shareholder desires to sell shares of Class B Common Stock, such stock
must be converted into shares of Class A Common Stock.
On March 12, 2013, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which the Company’s shareholders
approved an increase in the Company’s authorized common stock from 200,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share (“Class A Common Stock”), to 400,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and from 30,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B Common Stock”), to
60,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share.
On April 11, 2012, we issued 25,000,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock at a price of $2.00 per share,
resulting in net proceeds of $47.3 million. The net proceeds of the issuance, along with cash on hand, were used to
purchase $75.4 million principal amount of our senior notes, as discussed in Note 9.
Pursuant to agreements with bondholders, during the year ended October 31, 2012, we issued an aggregate of
8,443,713 shares of our Class A Common Stock in exchange for an aggregate of $33.2 million of our outstanding
indebtedness, consisting of $7.8 million principal amount of our 6.25% Senior Notes due 2016, $4.0 million principal
amount of our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2016, $18.3 million of our outstanding 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 and
95
approximately $3.1 million aggregate principal amount of our 12.072% senior subordinated amortizing notes (the
“exchanges”). The exchanges were effected with existing bondholders, without any underwriters, and no commission or
other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchanges. The exchanges resulted in a gain
on extinguishment of debt of $9.5 million for the year ended October 31, 2012.
On February 9, 2011, we issued 13,512,500 shares of our Class A Common Stock, including 1,762,500 shares
issued pursuant to the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters, at a price of $4.30 per share. A portion of the net
proceeds of the issuance, together with the net proceeds from the issuances of the 11.875% Senior Notes due 2015 and the
7.25% Tangible Equity Units were used to fund certain tender offers and subsequent redemptions as described in Note 9.
On August 4, 2008, our Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) designed to
preserve shareholder value and the value of certain tax assets primarily associated with net operating loss carryforwards
(NOL) and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Our ability to use NOLs and built-in losses
would be limited if there was an “ownership change” under Section 382. This would occur if shareholders owning (or
deemed under Section 382 to own) 5% or more of our stock increase their collective ownership of the aggregate amount of
our outstanding shares by more than 50 percentage points over a defined period of time. The Rights Plan was adopted to
reduce the likelihood of an “ownership change” occurring as defined by Section 382. Under the Rights Plan, one right was
distributed for each share of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on
August 15, 2008. Effective August 15, 2008, if any person or group acquires 4.9% or more of the outstanding shares of
Class A Common Stock without the approval of the Board of Directors, there would be a triggering event causing
significant dilution in the voting power of such person or group. However, existing stockholders who owned, at the time of
the Rights Plan’s adoption, 4.9% or more of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock will trigger a dilutive event
only if they acquire additional shares. The approval of the Board of Directors’ decision to adopt the Rights Plan may be
terminated by the Board at any time, prior to the Rights being triggered. The Rights Plan will continue in effect until
August 15, 2018, unless it expires earlier in accordance with its terms. The approval of the Board of Directors’ decision to
adopt the Rights Plan was submitted to a stockholder vote and approved at a special meeting of stockholders held on
December 5, 2008. Also at the Special Meeting on December 5, 2008, our stockholders approved an amendment to our
Certificate of Incorporation to restrict certain transfers of Class A Common Stock in order to preserve the tax treatment of
our NOLs and built-in losses under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Subject to certain exceptions pertaining to
pre-existing 5% stockholders and Class B stockholders, the transfer restrictions in the amended Certificate of Incorporation
generally restrict any direct or indirect transfer (such as transfers of our stock that result from the transfer of interests in
other entities that own our stock) if the effect would be to (i) increase the direct or indirect ownership of our stock by any
person (or public group) from less than 5% to 5% or more of our common stock; (ii) increase the percentage of our
common stock owned directly or indirectly by a person (or public group) owning or deemed to own 5% or more of our
common stock; or (iii) create a new public group. Transfers included under the transfer restrictions include sales to persons
(or public groups) whose resulting percentage ownership (direct or indirect) of common stock would exceed the 5%
thresholds discussed above, or to persons whose direct or indirect ownership of common stock would by attribution cause
another person (or public group) to exceed such threshold.
On July 3, 2001, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up to 4 million shares
of Class A Common Stock. There were no shares purchased during the year ended October 31, 2013. As of October 31,
2013, the maximum number of shares of Class A Common Stock that may yet be purchased under this program is 0.5
million.
Preferred Stock - On July 12, 2005, we issued 5,600 shares of 7.625% Series A Preferred Stock, with a
liquidation preference of $25,000 per share. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are not cumulative and are paid at
an annual rate of 7.625%. The Series A Preferred Stock is not convertible into the Company’s common stock and is
redeemable in whole or in part at our option at the liquidation preference of the shares. The Series A Preferred Stock is
traded as depositary shares, with each depositary share representing 1/1000th of a share of Series A Preferred Stock. The
depositary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “HOVNP.” In fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011,
we did not pay any dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock due to covenant restrictions in our debt instruments.
Retirement Plan - In December 1982, we established a tax-qualified, defined contribution savings and investment
retirement plan (a 401(k) plan). All associates are eligible to participate in the retirement plan, and employer contributions
are based on a percentage of associate contributions and our operating results. There were no plan costs charged to
operations in fiscal years 2012 and 2011, as forfeited unvested contributions were used to cover such costs. In fiscal 2009,
we suspended the employer match portion of the program. In fiscal 2013, the employer match portion of the program was
reinstated. Plan costs charged to operations were $0.6 million for the year ended October 31, 2013.
96
16. Stock Plans
The fair value of option awards is established at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions for October 31, 2013, October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011: risk free
interest rate of 2.14%, 1.65% and 2.99%, respectively; dividend yield of zero; historical volatility factor of the expected
market price of our common stock of 0.96 for year ended 2013, 0.97 for the year ended 2012, and 0.94 for the year ended
2011; a weighted-average expected life of the option of 7.30 years for 2013, 7.37 years for 2012 and 7.25 years for 2011;
and an estimated forfeiture rate of 18.17% for 2013, 15.99% for fiscal 2012 and 14.93% for fiscal 2011. The benefits of tax
deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are reported as both a financing cash inflow and an operating cash
outflow.
For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, total stock-based compensation expense was $6.8 million
(pre and post tax), $6.5 million (pre and post tax) and $6.2 million (pre and post tax), respectively. Included in this total
stock-based compensation expense was incremental expense for stock options of $4.0 million, $4.1 million and $4.4
million for the years ended October 31, 2013, October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, respectively.
We have a stock incentive plan pursuant to which stock options and other equity-based awards may be granted
to employees and directors. Options are granted by a committee appointed by the Board of Directors or its delegee in
accordance with the stock incentive plan. The exercise price of all stock options must be at least equal to the fair market
value of the underlying shares on the date of the grant. Options granted before June 8, 2007 generally vest in four equal
installments on the third, fourth, fifth and sixth anniversaries of the date of the grant. Options granted on or after June 8,
2007 generally vest in four equal installments on the second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of the grant.
All options expire 10 years after the date of the grant. During the year ended October 31, 2013, each of the five non-
employee directors of the Company were given the choice to receive stock options or a reduced number of shares of
restricted stock units. All five selected to receive restricted stock units. Non-employee directors’ options vest in three equal
installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of the grant. Stock option transactions are summarized
as follows:
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
October 31,
2012
October 31,
2013
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
October 31,
2011
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Options outstanding at beginning of
period
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Cancellations
Expired
194,204
Options outstanding at end of period 6,591,054
Options exercisable at end of period 3,161,952
6,019,070
887,500
44,812
76,500
$5.97
$6.28
$2.67
$3.06
5,094,367
1,334,828
6,250
94,808
$16.92
$5.74
309,067
6,019,070
2,467,170
$7.05 6,316,860
$2.59
674,100
$2.55
$4.77
238,499
1,200,000
$9.61
458,094
$5.97 5,094,367
1,764,338
$8.72
$1.93
$7.33
$11.19
$11.57
$7.05
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal 2013 and 2012 was $167 thousand and $8 thousand,
respectively. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds
the exercise price of the option. There were no options exercised in fiscal 2011.
At October 31, 2013, 1.9 million options outstanding and exercisable had an intrinsic value of $3.6 million.
Exercise prices for options outstanding at October 31, 2013 ranged from $1.93 to $60.36.
The weighted-average fair value of grants made in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $5.14, $1.74, and $1.57 per
share, respectively. Based on the fair value at the time they were granted, the weighted-average fair value of options vested
in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $2.72, $3.61, and $3.92 per share, respectively.
97
The following table summarizes the exercise price range and related number of options outstanding at
October 31, 2013:
Range of Exercise Prices
$1.93 – $5.00
$5.01 – $10.00
$10.01 – $20.00
$20.01 – $30.00
$30.01 – $40.00
$40.01 – $50.00
$50.01 – $60.00
$60.01 – $70.00
Number
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
4,405,679
1,701,500
-
241,500
197,375
10,000
30,000
5,000
6,591,054
$2.95
$6.37
$-
$21.70
$32.53
$41.45
$54.70
$60.36
$5.74
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
7.07
7.27
-
3.66
1.77
0.25
1.42
1.67
6.80
The following table summarizes the exercise price range and related number of exercisable options at October 31,
2013:
Range of Exercise Prices
$1.93 – $5.00
$5.01 – $10.00
$10.01 – $20.00
$20.01 – $30.00
$30.01 – $40.00
$40.01 – $50.00
$50.01 – $60.00
$60.01 – $70.00
Number
Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
1,864,077
814,000
-
241,500
197,375
10,000
30,000
5,000
3,161,952
$3.14
$6.46
$-
$21.70
$32.53
$41.45
$54.70
$60.36
$7.95
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
6.18
4.67
-
3.66
1.77
0.25
1.42
4.83
5.26
Officers and key employees who are eligible to receive equity grants may elect to receive either a stated number
of stock options, or a reduced number of shares of restricted stock units, or a combination thereof. Shares underlying
restricted stock units vest 25% each year beginning on the 2nd anniversary of the grant date. Participants age 60 years or
older, or age 58 with 15 years of service are eligible to vest in their equity awards on an accelerated basis on their
retirement (which in the case of the restricted stock units only applies to a retirement that is at least one year after the date
of grant). During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we granted 104,944 (including 63,694 shares to certain of
our non-employee directors) and 133,855 (including 104,167 shares to certain of our non-employee directors) shares of
restricted stock, respectively, and also issued 46,393 and 32,112 shares, relating to awards granted in prior fiscal years,
respectively. During the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, 500 and 9,845 shares of restricted stock were forfeited,
respectively.
For certain associates in certain years, a portion of their bonus is paid by issuing a deferred right to receive our
common stock. The number of shares is calculated for each bonus year by dividing the portion of the bonus subject to the
deferred right award by our average stock price for the year or the stock price at year-end, whichever is lower. Twenty-five
percent of the deferred right award will vest and shares will be issued one year after the year end and then 25% a year for
the next three years. Participants with 20 years of service or over 58 years of age vest immediately. During the years ended
October 31, 2013 and 2012, we issued 68,390 and 258,228 shares relating to awards granted in prior fiscal years. No shares
were forfeited during the year ended October 31, 2013, but during the year ended October 31, 2012, 8,701 shares were
forfeited. For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, no rights in lieu of bonus payments were awarded.
For the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 total compensation cost recognized in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the annual restricted stock grants, and the stock portion of the long term incentive plan was
98
$2.7 million, $2.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. In addition to nonvested share awards summarized in the
following table, there were 534,143 at both October 31, 2013 and 2012 and 692,668 at October 31, 2011 shares of vested
restricted stock which were deferred at the associates' election.
A summary of the Company’s nonvested share awards as of and for the year ended October 31, 2013, is as
follows:
Nonvested at beginning of period
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at end of period
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
$4.49
$5.63
$4.58
$4.61
$5.10
Shares
2,128,005
1,377,120
(979,462)
(62,016)
2,463,647
Included in the above table are restricted stock unit awards for a long term incentive plan for certain associates,
which is a performance based plan. The awards included above for this plan are based on our current best estimate of the
outcome for the performance criteria. The change in this estimate resulted in an increase of 0.4 million shares, which is
reflected in the granted row on the above table.
As of October 31, 2013, we had 0.3 million shares authorized for future issuance under our equity compensation
plans. In addition, as of October 31, 2013, there were $16.5 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to
nonvested share based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 2 years.
During fiscal 2011, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer consented to a cancellation of certain
of their options (with the full understanding that the Company made no commitment to provide them with any other form
of consideration in respect of the cancelled options) in order to reduce a portion of the equity reserve “overhang” under the
Company’s equity compensation plans represented by the number of shares of the Company’s common stock remaining
available for future issuance under such plans (including shares that may be issued upon the exercise or vesting of
outstanding options and other rights). No compensation expense was recorded related to the cancellation of stock options in
fiscal 2011, as the options canceled were fully vested and expensed prior to fiscal 2011.
17. Warranty Costs
Over the past several years, general liability insurance for homebuilding companies and their suppliers and
subcontractors has become very difficult to obtain. The availability of general liability insurance has been limited due to a
decreased number of insurance companies willing to underwrite for the industry. In addition, those few insurers willing to
underwrite liability insurance have significantly increased the premium costs. We have been able to obtain general liability
insurance but at higher premium costs with higher deductibles. We have been advised that a significant number of our
subcontractors and suppliers have also had difficulty obtaining insurance that also provides us coverage. As a result, we
introduced an owner controlled insurance program for certain of our subcontractors, whereby the subcontractors pay us an
insurance premium (through a reduction of amounts we would otherwise owe such subcontractors for their work on our
homes) based on the value of their services. We absorb the liability associated with their work on our homes as part of our
overall general liability insurance at no additional cost to us because our existing general liability and construction defect
insurance policy and related reserves for amounts under our deductible covers construction defects regardless of whether
we or our subcontractors are responsible for the defect. For the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, we received $2.2
million and $2.1 million, respectively, from subcontractors related to the owner controlled insurance program, which we
accounted for as a reduction to inventory.
We accrue for warranty costs that are covered under our existing general liability and construction defect policy
as part of our general liability insurance deductible. This accrual is expensed as selling, general, and administrative
costs. For homes delivered in fiscal 2013 and 2012, our deductible under our general liability insurance is $20 million per
occurrence for construction defect and warranty claims. For bodily injury claims, our deductible per occurrence in fiscal
2013 and 2012 is $0.25 million and $0.1 million, respectively, up to a $5 million limit. Our aggregate retention in fiscal
2013 and 2012 is $21 million for construction defect, warranty and bodily injury claims. In addition, we establish a
warranty accrual for lower cost-related issues to cover home repairs, community amenities, and land development
99
infrastructure that are not covered under our general liability and construction defect policy. We accrue an estimate for
these warranty costs as part of cost of sales at the time each home is closed and title and possession have been transferred to
the homebuyer. Additions and charges in the warranty reserve and general liability reserve for the years ended October 31,
2013 and 2012 were as follows:
(In thousands)
Balance, beginning of period
Additions – Selling, general and administrative
Additions – Cost of sales
Charges incurred during the period
Changes to pre-existing reserves
Balance, end of period
Year Ended October 31,
2013
2012
$121,149
18,676
13,529
(22,511)
185
$131,028
$123,865
13,438
17,509
(33,663)
-
$121,149
Warranty accruals are based upon historical experience. We engage a third-party actuary that uses our historical
warranty and construction defect data, worker’s compensation data, and other industry data to assist us in estimating our
reserves for unpaid claims, claim adjustment expenses and incurred but not reported claims reserves for the risks that we
are assuming under the general liability and workers compensation programs. The estimates include provisions for
inflation, claims handling, and legal fees.
Insurance claims paid by our insurance carriers, excluding insurance deductibles paid, were $9.7 million and
$18.1 million for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for prior year deliveries. In the third quarter of
fiscal 2012, we settled two construction defect claims, one claim relating to the Northeast segment and one claim relating to
the West segment, which made up the majority of the payments.
18. Transactions with Related Parties
During the year ended October 31, 2003, we entered into an agreement (as subsequently amended) to purchase
land in California for approximately $31.4 million from an entity that is owned by Hirair Hovnanian, a family relative of
our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. As of October 31, 2013, we had an option deposit of $3.0 million
related to this land acquisition agreement. In accordance with ASC 810-10 we no longer have any balances consolidated
under “Consolidated inventory not owned” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer has a financial interest in the relative’s company from whom the land was
purchased.
During the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, an engineering firm owned by Tavit Najarian, a
relative of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, provided services to the Company totaling $0.8 million,
$0.9 million, and $1.0 million, respectively. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer has a financial interest in the relative’s company from whom the services were provided.
During the year ended October 31, 2011, a real estate development firm owned by Mazin Kalian, a relative of our
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, provided consulting services to the Company totaling less than $0.1
million, including significant travel related expenses. The consulting services consisted primarily of negotiations,
community design and cost analysis on a potential joint venture. During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012,
there were no consulting services provided. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer has or had a financial interest in the relative’s company from whom the services were provided.
In December 2005, we entered into an agreement to purchase land in New Jersey from an entity that is owned by
Hirair Hovnanian, a family relative of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer at a base price of
$25 million. The land was to be acquired in four phases over a period of three years from the date of acquisition of the first
phase and the land seller was obligated to obtain all government approvals. The purchase prices for all phases were subject
to an increase in the purchase price of the phase per annum from February 1, 2008. On June 11, 2008, the parties amended
the purchase agreement and closed title to 43 of the 86 building lots in phase one. The purchase of the balance of phase one
was deferred to no later than the scheduled closing of phase four. On November 12, 2009, the parties closed title to 83
building lots located in phase two. On June 22, 2010, the parties closed title to 84 building lots located in phase three. On
June 13, 2011, the parties closed title to the 137 building lots, which included the building lots contained within phase four
and the deferred balance of building lots from phase one. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, all of the
100
property under the purchase agreement had been purchased by the Company for a total purchase price of approximately
$29.2 million. Neither the Company nor the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer has or had a financial
interest in the relatives' company from whom the land was purchased.
In November 2012, one of our joint ventures in which the Company has a 50% interest sold an option to acquire
a parcel of land for approximately $5.5 million. The total cost to the buyer was approximately $11.1 million and on which
the commission was paid. The son of Mr. Pellerito, one of the Company’s executive officers, was employed by the
brokerage firm that handled the transaction and received $145,710 as a commission in connection with the transaction. Mr.
Pellerito did not have a financial interest in the brokerage firm involved in the transaction nor did he receive any portion of
the commission paid to his son.
Ms. Jovana Pellerito, the daughter-in-law of Mr. Pellerito, one of our executive officers, is employed by the
Company and, in fiscal 2013, her total compensation, including salary, commissions and other benefits, totaled
approximately $172,000. Her compensation is commensurate with that of similarly situated employees in her position.
The Company has a significant interest in the amount of estate tax liabilities and any necessary sales by the Estate
of Kevork S. Hovnanian, deceased, and other members of the Hovnanian family of their assets (which includes a
significant amount of shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock) to pay such liabilities
because the benefit of federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) to the Company would be significantly reduced or
eliminated if we were to experience an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Based
on recent impairments and current financial performance, the Company has generated NOLs of approximately $1.5 billion
through the fiscal year ended October 31, 2013, and may generate NOLs in future years. During fiscal 2013, an outside law
firm was retained to advise the Executors of the Estate and other members of the Hovnanian family in connection with
estate tax planning. The fees and other charges of such legal services during fiscal 2013 totaled $249,653, of which (1) the
Company and (2) the Estate and Hovnanian family each paid half. Kevork S. Hovnanian was the founder and former
Chairman of our Company. Our current Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and other members of his
immediate family are Executors and among the beneficiaries of the will of Kevork S. Hovnanian.
19. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a
material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations, and we are subject to extensive and complex
regulations that affect the development and home building, sales and customer financing processes, including zoning,
density, building standards and mortgage financing. These regulations often provide broad discretion to the administering
governmental authorities. This can delay or increase the cost of development or homebuilding.
We also are subject to a variety of local, state, federal and foreign laws and regulations concerning protection of
health and the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given community vary greatly according
to the community site, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental
laws may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance, remediation and/or other costs, and can prohibit or
severely restrict development and homebuilding activity.
We received in October 2012 a notice from Region III of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
concerning stipulated penalties, totaling approximately $120,000, based on the extent to which we reportedly did not meet
certain compliance performance specified in the previously reported consent decree entered into in August 2010; we have
since paid the stipulated penalties as assessed, and more recently have paid approximately $8,000 in response to an EPA
demand received in June 2013 for stipulated penalties based on information about our performance under the consent
decree for 2012. The consent decree was terminated by court order without objection in December 2013.
In March 2013, we received a letter from the EPA requesting information about our involvement in a housing
redevelopment project in Newark, New Jersey that a Company entity undertook during the 1990s. We understand that the
development is in the vicinity of a former lead smelter and that recent tests on soil samples from properties within the
development conducted by the EPA show elevated levels of lead. We also understand that the smelter operated before the
City of Newark acquired properties, demolished structures existing on them, and sold the properties to the Company entity
in connection with the redevelopment project. We responded to the EPA’s request. In August 2013, we were notified that
the EPA considers us a potentially responsible party (or “PRP”) with respect to the site, that the EPA believes the site
requires cleanup, and that the EPA is proposing that we address contamination at the site. We have begun preliminary
discussions with the EPA concerning a possible resolution but do not know the scope or extent of the Company's
101
obligations, if any, that may arise from the site and therefore cannot provide any assurance that this matter will not have a
material impact on the Company.
We anticipate that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on developers and homebuilders in the
future. Although we cannot predict the effect of these requirements, they could result in time-consuming and expensive
compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. In
addition our ability to obtain or renew permits or approvals and the continued effectiveness of permits already granted or
approvals already obtained is dependent upon many factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as changes in
policies, rules, and regulations and their interpretations and application.
The Company is also involved in the following litigation:
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and K. Hovnanian Venture I, L.L.C. (collectively, the “Company Defendants”) have
been named as defendants in a class action suit. The action was filed by Mike D’Andrea and Tracy D’Andrea, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Gloucester County. The action was
initially filed on May 8, 2006 alleging that the HVAC systems installed in certain of the Company’s homes are in violation
of applicable New Jersey building codes and are a potential safety issue. On December 14, 2011, the Superior Court
granted class certification; the potential class is 1,065 homes. The Company Defendants filed a request to take an
interlocutory appeal regarding the class certification decision. The Appellate Division denied the request, and the Company
Defendants filed a request for interlocutory review by the New Jersey Supreme Court, which remanded the case back to the
Appellate Division for a review on the merits of the appeal on May 8, 2012. The Appellate Division, on remand, heard oral
arguments on December 4, 2012, reviewing the Superior Court’s original finding of class certification. On June 18, 2013,
the Appellate Division affirmed class certification. On July 3, 2013, the Company Defendants appealed the June 2013
Appellate Division’s decision to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which elected not to hear the appeal on October 22,
2013. Accordingly, the matter is proceeding in the Superior Court and discovery is ongoing. The Company Defendants
have pending a motion to consolidate an indemnity action they filed against various manufacturer and sub-contractor
defendants so that these parties will be required to participate directly in the class action. The plaintiff class seeks
unspecified damages as well as treble damages pursuant to the NJ Consumer Fraud Act. The Company Defendants believe
there is insurance coverage available for this action. It is not possible to estimate a loss or range of loss related to this
matter at this time.
20. Variable Interest Entities
The Company enters into land and lot option purchase contracts to procure land or lots for the construction of
homes. Under these contracts, the Company will fund a stated deposit in consideration for the right, but not the obligation,
to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. Under the terms of the option purchase
contracts, many of the option deposits are not refundable at the Company's discretion. Under the requirements of ASC 810,
certain option purchase contracts may result in the creation of a variable interest in the entity (“VIE”) that owns the land
parcel under option.
In compliance with ASC 810, the Company analyzes its option purchase contracts to determine whether the
corresponding land sellers are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary. Although the Company
does not have legal title to the underlying land, ASC 810 requires the Company to consolidate a VIE if the Company is
determined to be the primary beneficiary. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary, the Company considers,
among other things, whether it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s
economic performance. Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of
the VIE, selling or transferring property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE. The Company
also considers whether it has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE. As a
result of its analyses, the Company determined that, as of October 31, 2013 and 2012, it was not the primary beneficiary of
any VIEs from which it is purchasing land under option purchase contracts.
We will continue to secure land and lots using options, some of which are with VIEs. Including deposits on our
unconsolidated VIEs, at October 31, 2013, we had total cash and letters of credit deposits amounting to approximately
$79.3 million to purchase land and lots with a total purchase price of $1.1 billion. The maximum exposure to loss with
respect to our land and lot options is limited to the deposits plus any pre-development costs invested in the property,
although some deposits are refundable at our request or refundable if certain conditions are not met.
102
21. Investments in Unconsolidated Homebuilding and Land Development Joint Ventures
We enter into homebuilding and land development joint ventures from time to time as a means of accessing lot
positions, expanding our market opportunities, establishing strategic alliances, managing our risk profile, leveraging our
capital base and enhancing returns on capital. Our homebuilding joint ventures are generally entered into with third-party
investors to develop land and construct homes that are sold directly to third-party home buyers. Our land development joint
ventures include those entered into with developers and other homebuilders as well as financial investors to develop
finished lots for sale to the joint venture’s members or other third parties.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, we purchased our partners’ interest in one of our unconsolidated
homebuilding joint ventures. The consolidation of this entity resulted in increases in inventory, other assets, non-recourse
land mortgages and accounts payables and other liabilities of $34.3 million, $5.0 million, $20.6 million and $15.8 million,
respectively.
The tables set forth below summarize the combined financial information related to our unconsolidated
homebuilding and land development joint ventures that are accounted for under the equity method.
(Dollars In Thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Inventories
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and equity:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Notes payable
Total liabilities
Equity of:
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
Others
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
Debt to capitalization ratio
(Dollars In Thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Inventories
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and equity:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Notes payable
Total liabilities
Equity of:
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
Others
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
Debt to capitalization ratio
Homebuilding
October 31, 2013
Land
Development
Total
$30,102
101,735
6,868
$138,705
$28,016
23,904
51,920
44,141
42,644
86,785
$138,705
22%
$639
11,080
-
$11,719
$4,047
-
4,047
2,703
4,969
7,672
$11,719
0%
$30,741
112,815
6,868
$150,424
$32,063
23,904
55,967
46,844
47,613
94,457
$150,424
20%
Homebuilding
October 31, 2012
Land
Development
Total
$29,657
177,170
12,886
$219,713
$24,651
79,675
104,326
45,285
70,102
115,387
$219,713
41%
$1,686
14,853
5
$16,544
$12,233
-
12,233
794
3,517
4,311
$16,544
0%
$31,343
192,023
12,891
$236,257
$36,884
79,675
116,559
46,079
73,619
119,698
$236,257
40%
As of October 31, 2013 and 2012, we had advances outstanding of approximately $4.6 million and $15.0
million, respectively, to these unconsolidated joint ventures, which were included in the “Accounts payable and accrued
103
liabilities” balances in the tables above. On our Consolidated Balance Sheets, our “Investments in and advances to
unconsolidated joint ventures” amounted to $51.4 million and $61.1 million at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In
some cases, our net investment in these joint ventures is less than our proportionate share of the equity reflected in the
tables above because of the differences between asset impairments recorded against our joint venture investments and any
impairments recorded in the applicable joint venture. Impairments of our joint venture equity investments are recorded
when we deem a decline in fair value to be other than temporary while impairments recorded in the joint ventures are
recorded when undiscounted cash flows of the community indicate that the carrying amount is not recoverable. During
fiscal 2011, 2012 and 2013, we did not write down any joint venture investments based on our determination that none of
the investments in our joint ventures sustained an other than temporary impairment during those periods.
(Dollars In Thousands)
Revenues
Cost of sales and expenses
Joint venture net income
Our share of net income
(Dollars In Thousands)
Revenues
Cost of sales and expenses
Joint venture net income
Our share of net income
(Dollars In Thousands)
Revenues
Cost of sales and expenses
Joint venture net (loss) income
Our share of net (loss) income
For The Twelve Months Ended
October 31, 2013
Land
Development
Homebuilding
$307,993
(276,795)
$31,198
$9,581
$14,659
(9,396)
$5,263
$2,631
For The Twelve Months Ended
October 31, 2012
Land
Development
Homebuilding
$323,177
(300,892)
$22,285
$4,763
$11,531
(9,318)
$2,213
$1,108
For The Twelve Months Ended
October 31, 2011
Land
Development
Homebuilding
$177,301
(181,651)
$(4,350)
$(8,395)
$12,226
(11,114)
$1,112
$647
Total
$322,652
(286,191)
$36,461
$12,212
Total
$334,708
(310,210)
$24,498
$5,871
Total
$189,527
(192,765)
$(3,238)
$(7,748)
“Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations
reflects our proportionate share of the loss or income of these unconsolidated homebuilding and land development joint
ventures. The difference between our share of the loss or income from these unconsolidated joint ventures in the tables
above compared to the Consolidated Statements of Operations is due primarily to the reclassification of the intercompany
portion of management fee income from certain joint ventures and the deferral of income for lots purchased by us from
certain joint ventures. To compensate us for the administrative services we provide as the manager of certain joint ventures
we receive a management fee based on a percentage of the applicable joint venture’s revenues. These management fees,
which totaled $13.2 million, $15.2 million and $7.6 million for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011,
respectively, are recorded in homebuilding selling, general and administrative on the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
In determining whether or not we must consolidate joint ventures that we manage, we assess whether the other
partners have specific rights to overcome the presumption of control by us as the manager of the joint venture. In most
cases, the presumption is overcome because the joint venture agreements require that both partners agree on establishing
the operations and capital decisions of the partnership, including budgets in the ordinary course of business.
Typically, our unconsolidated joint ventures obtain separate project specific mortgage financing. The amount
of financing is generally targeted to be no more than 50% of the joint venture’s total assets. For our more recent joint
ventures, obtaining financing has become challenging, therefore, some of our joint ventures are capitalized only with
equity. Including the impact of impairments recorded by the joint ventures, the average debt to capitalization ratio of all our
104
joint ventures is currently 20%. Any joint venture financing is on a nonrecourse basis, with guarantees from us limited only
to performance and completion of development, environmental warranties and indemnification, standard indemnification
for fraud, misrepresentation and other similar actions, including a voluntary bankruptcy filing. In some instances, the joint
venture entity is considered a VIE under ASC 810-10 “Consolidation – Overall” due to the returns being capped to the
equity holders; however, in these instances, we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary, and therefore we
do not consolidate these entities.
22. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", provides a framework for measuring fair value,
expands disclosures about fair-value measurements and establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value summarized as follows:
Level 1: Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2: Fair value determined using significant other observable inputs.
Level 3: Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs.
Our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
(In thousands)
Mortgage loans held for sale (1)
Interest rate lock commitments
Forward contracts
Total
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Fair Value at
October 31, 2013
Fair Value at
October 31, 2012
Level 2
Level 2
Level 2
$113,739
369
(1,155)
$112,953
$116,912
(8)
120
$117,024
(1) The aggregate unpaid principal balance is $107.7 million and $113.8 million at October 31, 2013 and 2012,
respectively.
We elected the fair value option for our loans held for sale for mortgage loans originated subsequent to October
31, 2008 in accordance with ASC 825, “Financial Instruments,” which permits us to measure financial instruments at fair
value on a contract-by-contract basis. Management believes that the election of the fair value option for loans held for sale
improves financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring the fair value of the loans
and the derivative instruments used to economically hedge them without having to apply complex hedge accounting
provisions. In addition, the fair value of servicing rights is included in the Company’s loans held for sale as of October 31,
2013. Fair value of the servicing rights is determined based on values in the Company’s servicing sales contracts. Fair
value of loans held for sale is based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices for other mortgage
whole loans with similar characteristics.
The Financial Services segment had a pipeline of loan applications in process of $371.4 million at October 31,
2013. Loans in process for which interest rates were committed to the borrowers totaled approximately $55.4 million as of
October 31, 2013. Substantially all of these commitments were for periods of 60 days or less. Since a portion of these
commitments is expected to expire without being exercised by the borrowers, the total commitments do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements.
The Financial Services segment uses investor commitments and forward sales of mandatory mortgage-backed
securities (“MBS”) to hedge its mortgage-related interest rate exposure. These instruments involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk is managed by entering into MBS forward commitments, option
contracts with investment banks, federally regulated bank affiliates and loan sales transactions with permanent investors
meeting the segment’s credit standards. The segment’s risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference
between the contract price and fair value of the MBS forward commitments and option contracts. At October 31, 2013, the
segment had open commitments amounting to $25.0 million to sell MBS with varying settlement dates through December
11, 2013.
105
The assets accounted for using the fair value option are initially measured at fair value. Gains and losses from
initial measurement and subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in the Financial Services segment’s income. The
changes in fair values that are included in income (loss) are shown, by financial instrument and financial statement line
item, below:
(In thousands)
Loans Held
For
Sale
Year Ended October 31, 2013
Mortgage
Loan
Commitments
Forward
Contracts
Changes in fair value included in net income (loss), all
reflected in financial services revenues
$1,604
$378
$(1,276)
(In thousands)
Loans Held
For
Sale
Year Ended October 31, 2012
Mortgage
Loan
Commitments
Forward
Contracts
Changes in fair value included in net income (loss), all
reflected in financial services revenues
$(572)
$(151)
$1,216
(In thousands)
Loans Held
For
Sale
Year Ended October 31, 2011
Mortgage
Loan
Commitments
Forward
Contracts
Changes in fair value included in net income (loss), all
reflected in financial services revenues
$362
$63
$(842)
The Company's assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are those assets for which the Company
has recorded valuation adjustments and write-offs during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012. The assets
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are all within the Company's Homebuilding operations and are summarized
below:
Nonfinancial Assets
(In thousands)
Year Ended
October 31, 2013
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Pre-
Impairment
Amount
Total Losses
Fair Value
Sold and unsold homes and lots under
development
Land and land options held for future
development or sale
Level 3
Level 3
$7,302
$(2,249)
$5,053
$924
$(136)
$788
106
Nonfinancial Assets
(In thousands)
Sold and unsold homes and lots under
development
Year Ended
October 31, 2012
Fair
Value
Hierarchy
Pre-
Impairment
Amount
Total Losses
Fair Value
Level 3
$11,065
$(3,234)
$7,831
Land and land options held for future development
or sale
Level 3
$26,998
$(6,589)
$20,409
We record impairment losses on inventories related to communities under development and held for future
development when events and circumstances indicate that they may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated
to be generated by those assets are less than their related carrying amounts. If the expected undiscounted cash flows are
less than the carrying amount, then the community is written down to its fair value. We estimate the fair value of each
impaired community by determining the present value of its estimated future cash flows at a discount rate commensurate
with the risk of the respective community. Should the estimates or expectations used in determining cash flows or fair value
decrease or differ from current estimates in the future, we may be required to recognize additional impairments. We
recorded inventory impairments, which are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Inventory
impairment loss and land option write-offs” and deducted from Inventory of $2.4 million, $9.8 million and $77.5 million
for the years ended October 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See Note 13 for a further discussion of communities
evaluated for impairment.
The fair value of our cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates their carrying amount, based on Level 1
inputs.
The fair value of each series of the senior unsecured notes (other than the senior exchangeable notes and senior
amortizing notes) and senior subordinated amortizing notes is estimated based on recent trades or quoted market prices for
the same issues or based on recent trades or quoted market prices for our debt of similar security and maturity to achieve
comparable yields, which are Level 2 measurements. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes (all series in the
aggregate), other than the senior exchangeable notes and senior amortizing notes, and senior subordinated amortizing notes,
was estimated at $493.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2013. As of October 31, 2012 the fair
value of the senior unsecured notes (all series in the aggregate), other than the senior exchangeable notes and the senior
amortizing notes, and senior subordinated amortizing notes was estimated at $448.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
The fair value of each of the senior secured notes (all series in the aggregate), senior amortizing notes and senior
exchangeable notes is estimated based on third party broker quotes, a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of the senior
secured notes (all series in the aggregate), senior amortizing notes and senior exchangeable notes was estimated at $1.0
billion, $20.9 million and $86.8 million, respectively, as of October 31, 2013. As of October 31, 2012, the fair value of the
senior secured notes (all series in the aggregate), senior amortizing notes and senior exchangeable notes was estimated at
$994.2 million, $23.1 million and $87.2 million, respectively.
23. Financial Information of Subsidiary Issuer and Subsidiary Guarantors
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the parent company (the “Parent”), is the issuer of publicly traded common stock,
preferred stock, which is represented by depository shares, and 7.25% Tangible Equity Units. One of its wholly owned
subsidiaries, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (the “Subsidiary Issuer”), acts as a finance entity that, as of October 31, 2013,
had issued and outstanding approximately $992.0 million of senior secured notes ($978.6 million, net of discount), $462.6
million senior notes ($461.2 million, net of discount), $20.9 million senior amortizing notes and $66.6 million senior
exchangeable notes (issued as components of our 6.0% Exchangeable Note Units), and $2.2 million senior subordinated
amortizing notes (issued as a component of our 7.25% Tangible Equity Units). The senior secured notes, senior notes,
senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by the Parent.
In addition to the Parent, each of the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Parent other than the Subsidiary Issuer
(collectively, “Guarantor Subsidiaries”), with the exception of our home mortgage subsidiaries, certain of our title
insurance subsidiaries, joint ventures, subsidiaries holding interests in our joint ventures and our foreign subsidiary
107
(collectively, the “Nonguarantor Subsidiaries”), have guaranteed fully and unconditionally, on a joint and several basis, the
obligations of the Subsidiary Issuer to pay principal and interest under the senior secured notes (other than the 2021 Notes),
senior notes, senior exchangeable notes, senior amortizing notes and senior subordinated amortizing notes. The Guarantor
Subsidiaries are directly or indirectly 100% owned subsidiaries of the Parent. The 2021 Notes are guaranteed by the
Guarantor Subsidiaries and the members of the Secured Group (see Note 9).
The senior unsecured notes, senior amortizing notes, senior exchangeable notes and senior subordinated
amortizing notes have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2020 Secured Notes and the 2021
Notes (see Note 9) are not, pursuant to the indentures under which such notes were issued, required to be registered. The
Consolidating Financial Statements presented below are in respect of our registered notes only and not the 2020 Secured
Notes or the 2021 Notes (however, the Guarantor Subsidiaries for the 2020 Secured Notes are the same as those
represented by the accompanying Consolidating Financial Statements). In lieu of providing separate financial statements
for the Guarantor Subsidiaries of our registered notes, we have included the accompanying Consolidating Financial
Statements. Therefore, separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning such Guarantor Subsidiaries are not
presented.
The following Consolidating Condensed Financial Statements present the results of operations, financial
position and cash flows of (i) the Parent, (ii) the Subsidiary Issuer, (iii) the Guarantor Subsidiaries, (iv) the Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries and (v) the eliminations to arrive at the information for Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. on a consolidated
basis. Investments in consolidated subsidiaries, Stockholders’ (deficit) equity and Intercompany in the Consolidating
Condensed Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2012, Equity in (loss) income from subsidiaries in the Consolidating
Condensed Statement of Operations for the Years Ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 and Net (loss) income and
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities in the Consolidating
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2012 and 2011 have been reclassified to conform to
the fiscal 2013 presentation.
108
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
OCTOBER 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Assets:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Intercompany receivable
Investments in and amounts
due to and from consolidated
subsidiaries
Total assets
Liabilities and equity:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Notes payable
Intercompany payable
Income taxes payable (receivable)
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity
Non-controlling interest in
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$- $277,800 $1,020,435
14,570
1,093,906
$312,042 $
134,283
14,489
$1,610,277
148,853
-
(1,108,395)
(62,298)
286,216
$(62,298) $1,373,981 $1,321,221
2,275
-
$460,814 $(1,334,588) $1,759,130
(226,193)
$3,798
$491
1,555,336
326,262
40,868
(433,226)
(181,846)
$437,767
14,789
2,276
805,774
(37,567)
98,182
$64,329 $
109,748
94
(1,132,036)
286,216
(202,552)
$506,385
124,537
1,557,706
-
3,301
(433,226)
consolidated joint ventures
Total liabilities and equity
$(62,298) $1,373,981 $1,321,221
427
427
$460,814 $(1,334,588) $1,759,130
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
OCTOBER 31, 2012
(In thousands)
Assets:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Investments in consolidated
subsidiaries
Total assets
Liabilities and equity:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Notes payable
Income taxes payable (receivable)
Intercompany
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity
Non-controlling interest in
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Nonguarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$6,155 $259,339
$976,836
23,669
$277,286 $
140,965
$1,519,616
164,634
(80,674 )
246,467
$(74,519 ) $273,129 $1,246,972
13,790
$125
$1,671
$391,628
23,070
271
(33,669)
368,834 (1,930,998) 1,589,502
(723,830)
(485,575 )
1,561,635
642,367
40,551
$418,251
-
(179,583)
$(179,583) $1,684,250
$61,800 $
122,024
489
(12,759)
246,467
(14,579)
(165,004)
$455,224
145,094
1,562,395
6,882
-
(485,575)
consolidated joint ventures
Total liabilities and equity
$(74,519 ) $273,129 $1,246,972
230
$418,251
230
$(179,583) $1,684,250
109
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Revenues:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Intercompany charges
Total revenues
Expenses:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total expenses
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of
debt
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures
(Loss) income before income
taxes
State and federal income tax
(benefit) provision
Equity in income (loss) from
subsidiaries
Net income (loss)
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$3
3
$(235) $1,497,016
9,386
(104,212)
1,402,190
81,816
81,581
$311,730
38,341
(2,325)
347,746
$(4,988) $1,803,526
47,727
-
1,851,253
24,721
19,733
8,608
17
8,625
123,511
123,511
1,373,360
6,721
1,380,081
295,390
22,321
317,711
10,670
10,670
1,811,539
29,059
1,840,598
(770,769)
770,009
2,327
9,713
(760)
12,040
(8,622)
(812,699)
794,445
39,748
9,063
21,935
(21,541)
12,181
(9,360)
18,376
$31,295
(11,514)
$(824,213)
39,748
$822,012
$39,748
(46,610)
$(37,547)
-
$31,295
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2012
(In thousands)
Revenues:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Intercompany charges
Total revenues
Expenses:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total expenses
Loss on extinguishment of debt
Income from unconsolidated joint
ventures
(Loss) income before income
taxes
State and federal income tax
(benefit) provision
Equity in (loss) income from
Subsidiary
Parent
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$9
9
$(270) $1,364,733
8,082
(120,094)
98,805
98,535 1,252,721
$87,124
30,653
(3,590)
114,187
$(4,978) $1,446,618
38,735
-
1,485,353
24,879
19,901
3,030
(28)
3,002
150,297 1,300,728
5,737
150,297 1,306,465
(29,066)
79,899
17,951
97,850
5,334
(12)
5,322
561
4,840
1,539,288
23,648
1,562,936
(29,066)
5,401
(2,993)
(80,828)
(53,183)
21,177
14,579
(101,248)
(17,495)
(17,580)
24
(35,051)
subsidiaries
Net (loss) income
(80,699)
(1,521)
$(66,197) $(82,349)
21,153
$(14,450)
$21,153
61,067
$75,646
-
$(66,197)
110
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2011
(In thousands)
Revenues:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Intercompany charges
Total revenues
Expenses:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total expenses
Gain on extinguishment of debt
Loss from unconsolidated joint
ventures
(Loss) income before income
taxes
State and federal income tax
(benefit) provision
Equity in (loss) income from
subsidiaries
Net (loss) income
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$21
21
5,704
307
6,011
$(245) $1,103,249
5,523
(152,042)
956,730
114,592
114,347
164,947
164,947
7,528
1,218,886
4,809
1,223,695
$7,360
23,958
(655)
30,663
1,073
16,263
17,336
(712)
(8,246)
$(4,959) $1,105,426
29,481
-
1,134,907
38,105
33,146
13,084
(8)
13,076
1,403,694
21,371
1,425,065
7,528
(8,958)
(5,990)
(43,072)
(267,677)
5,081
20,070
(291,588)
(20,084)
14,583
(5,501)
(300,181)
5,081
$(286,087) $(35,054) $(277,179)
8,018
$5,081
287,082
$307,152
-
$(286,087)
111
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2013
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating
activities:
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net
income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in)
operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
Net cash provided by investing
activities
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
Intercompany financing activities
- net
Net increase (decrease) in cash
Cash and cash equivalents
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$31,295
$(824,213)
$822,012
$39,748
$(37,547)
$31,295
29,653
797,892
(875,287)
(11,832)
37,547
(22,027)
60,948
(26,321)
(53,275)
27,916
235
11,819
18,231
(6,139)
52,914
(30,356)
(60,948)
-
78,598
46,373
(15,920)
(4,462)
(1,730)
14,061
-
-
-
-
-
-
9,268
30,285
16,419
-
55,972
273,232
balance, beginning of period
-
197,097
(2,017)
78,152
Cash and cash equivalents
balance, end of period
$-
$243,470
$(6,479)
$92,213
$-
$329,204
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2012
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating
activities:
Net (loss) income
Adjustments to reconcile net
(loss) income to net cash
(used in) provided by
operating activities
Net cash (used in) provided by
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$(66,197) $(82,349)
$(14,450)
$21,153
$75,646
$(66,197)
37,030
53,114
124,875
(140,174)
(75,646)
(801)
operating activities
(29,167)
(29,235)
110,425
(119,021)
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
Intercompany financing activities
-
146
(3,260)
1,614
47,221
(79,976)
49,670
74,075
- net
(18,054)
194,040
84,975
(153,863)
2,972
(22,123)
(65,455)
112,122
(4,989)
143,607
-
-
Net increase (decrease) in cash
Cash and cash equivalents
balance, beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents
balance, end of period
-
-
-
-
-
-
(66,998)
(1,500)
90,990
-
22,492
250,740
$-
$197,097
$(2,017)
$78,152
$-
$273,232
112
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2011
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating
activities:
Net (loss) income
Adjustments to reconcile net
(loss) income to net cash
provided by (used in)
operating activities
Net cash (used in) provided by
Parent
Subsidiary
Issuer
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
$(286,087) $(35,054) $(277,179)
$5,081
$307,152
$(286,087)
93,926
(42,459)
352,320
(17,963)
(307,152)
78,672
operating activities
(192,161)
(77,513)
75,141
(12,882)
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
Intercompany financing activities
- net
Net (decrease) increase in cash
Cash and cash equivalents
-
-
(223)
1,418
54,899
56,428
2,367
(23,914)
137,252
(10)
(79,163)
(100,248)
(69,462)
7,823
11,373
(24,005)
balance, beginning of period
10
212,370
(12,812)
167,612
-
-
-
-
-
-
(207,415)
1,195
89,780
-
(116,440)
367,180
Cash and cash equivalents
balance, end of period
$-
$112,122
$(4,989)
$143,607
$-
$250,740
24. Unaudited Summarized Consolidated Quarterly Information
Summarized quarterly financial information for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Revenues
Expenses
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs
(Loss) on extinguishment of debt
Income from unconsolidated joint ventures
Income (loss) before income taxes
State and federal income tax provision (benefit)
Net income (loss)
Per share data:
Basic:
Income (loss) per common share
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding
Assuming dilution:
Income (loss) per common share
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
October 31,
2013
$591,687
561,061
1,486
(760)
5,234
33,614
795
$32,819
Three Months Ended
July 31,
2013
$478,357
471,036
623
-
3,690
10,388
1,922
$8,466
April 30,
2013
$422,998
422,899
2,191
-
827
(1,265 )
(2,583 )
$1,318
January 31,
2013
$358,211
380,637
665
-
2,289
(20,802)
(9,494)
$(11,308)
$0.22
$0.06
$0.01
$(0.08)
145,821
146,056
145,948
141,725
$0.21
162,100
$0.06
162,823
$0.01
147,231
$(0.08)
141,725
113
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Revenues
Expenses
Inventory impairment loss and land option write-offs
(Loss) gain on extinguishment of debt
Income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures
(Loss) income before income taxes
State and federal income tax provision (benefit)
Net (loss) income
Per share data:
Basic:
(Loss) income per common share
Weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding
Assuming dilution:
October 31,
2012
$487,045
481,996
5,300
(87,033)
3,077
(84,207)
203
$(84,410)
Three Months Ended
July 31,
2012
$387,011
395,221
689
6,230
852
(1,817)
(36,493)
$34,676
April 30,
2012
$341,698
364,678
3,216
27,039
1,495
2,338
536
$1,802
January 31,
2012
$269,599
308,511
3,325
24,698
(23)
(17,562)
703
$(18,265)
$(0.59)
$0.25
$0.02
$(0.17)
142,249
138,472
116,021
108,735
(Loss) income per common share
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
$(0.59)
142,249
$0.25
138,552
$0.02
116,117
$(0.17)
108,735
114
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return*
Among Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Homebuilding Index
The following graph compares on a cumulative basis the yearly percentage change over the five-year period ended October
31, 2013 in (i) the total shareholder return on the Company’s Class A Common Stock with (ii) the total return of the Standard
& Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index and with (iii) the total return on the S&P Homebuilding Index. Such yearly percentage change has
been measured by dividing (i) the sum of (a) the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming
dividend reinvestment, and (b) the price per share at the end of the measurement period less the price per share at the
beginning of the measurement period, by (ii) the price per share at the beginning of the measurement period. The price of
each share has been set at $100 on October 31, 2008 for the preparation of the five year graph.
Note: The stock price performance shown on the following graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
10/08
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
S&P 500
S&P Homebuilding
10/09
10/10
10/11
10/12
10/13
*$100 invested on 10/31/08 in stock or index, assuming reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending October 31.
Source: Standard & Poor’s Financial Services, LLC, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
Board of Directors and
Corporate Officers
Corporate Information
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte & Touche LLP
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112-0015
TRANSFER AGENT AND
REGISTRAR
Computershare
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rhode Island 02940
For additional information on the
Direct Registration System please
visit the Investor Relations section
of our website at khov.com
For additional information, visit
our website at khov.com
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
Ara K. Hovnanian
Chairman of the Board,
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
Robert B. Coutts
Director
Edward A. Kangas
Director
Joseph A. Marengi
Director
Vincent Pagano Jr.
Director
J. Larry Sorsby
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
and Director
Stephen D. Weinroth
Director
CHIEF OPERATING
OFFICER
Thomas J. Pellerito
ANNUAL MEETING
March 11, 2014,10:30 a.m.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
VICE PRESIDENTS
David L. Bachstetter
Charles E. D’Angelo
Laura C. Dempsey
Michael Discafani
David A. Friend
Jane M. Hurd
Paul Marabella
Brad G. O’Connor
Jeffrey T. O’Keefe
Nicholas Pappas
P. Dean Potter
David G. Valiaveedan
Laura A. VanVelthoven
C. Douglas Whitlock
Marcia Wines
STOCK LISTING
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
Class A common stock is traded on
the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol HOV.
FORM 10-K
A copy of the Form 10-K, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, is included herein.
Additional copies are available free
of charge upon request to the:
Office of the Controller
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
110 West Front Street
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
732-383-2200
INVESTOR RELATIONS
CONTACTS
J. Larry Sorsby
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
732-383-2200
Jeffrey T. O’Keefe
Vice President, Investor Relations
732-383-2200
E-mail: ir@khov.com
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
110 West Front Street
Red Bank, New Jersey 07701
732-383-2200
For additional information visit our website at khov.com