Annual Report and Accounts
HSBC Holdings plc
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Annual Report and Accounts 2007
Headquartered in London, HSBC is one of the largest banking and financial
services organisations in the world. Its international network comprises some
10,000 properties in 83 countries and territories in Europe; Hong Kong; Rest of
Asia-Pacific, including the Middle East and Africa; North America and Latin
America.
With listings on the London, Hong Kong, New York, Paris and Bermuda stock
exchanges, shares in HSBC Holdings plc are held by about 200,000 shareholders
in over 100 countries and territories. The shares are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange in the form of American Depositary Shares.
HSBC provides a comprehensive range of financial services to 128 million
customers through four customer groups and global businesses: Personal
Financial Services (including consumer finance); Commercial Banking; Global
Banking and Markets; and Private Banking.
Contents
Page
Page
Financial Highlights ............................................... 1
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
in Relation to Financial Statements ............. 333
Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements ........................... 4
Report of the Directors ......................................... 6
Business Review1 ................................................. 6
Financial Review1 ............................................ 131
The Management of Risk1 ................................ 192
Governance1 .................................................... 289
Directors’ Remuneration Report1 .................... 322
1 Detailed contents are provided on the referenced pages.
Certain defined terms
Independent Auditor’s Report ......................... 334
Financial Statements1 ........................................ 336
Notes on the Financial Statements ................... 344
Shareholder Information .................................. 453
Glossary and Index ........................................... 464
Unless the context requires otherwise, ‘HSBC Holdings’ means HSBC Holdings plc and ‘HSBC’ or the ‘Group’
means HSBC Holdings together with its subsidiaries. Within this document the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region of the People’s Republic of China is referred to as ‘Hong Kong’. When used in the terms ‘shareholders’
equity’ and ‘total shareholders’ equity’, ‘shareholders’ means holders of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares and those
preference shares classified as equity.
This document comprises the Annual Report and Accounts 2007 for HSBC Holdings plc and its subsidiaries. It contains the Report of the
Directors and Financial Statements, together with the Independent Auditor’s Report thereon, as required by the UK Companies Act 1985.
The Annual Review 2007 of HSBC Holdings plc is published as a separate document. The Report of the Directors on pages 6 to 321 and
the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 322 to 332 have each been drawn up in accordance with the requirements of English law,
and liability in respect thereof is also governed by English law. In particular, the liability of the Directors for these reports is solely to
HSBC Holdings.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Highlights
For the year
•
•
•
•
•
•
Total operating income up 25.0 per cent to US$87,601 million (2006: US$70,070 million).
Net operating income up 12.7 per cent to US$61,751 million (2006: US$54,793 million).
Group pre-tax profit up 9.6 per cent to US$24,212 million (2006: US$22,086 million).
Profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company up 21.2 per cent to US$19,133 million
(2006: US$15,789 million).
Return on average invested capital of 15.3 per cent (2006: 14.9 per cent).
Earnings per ordinary share up 17.9 per cent to US$1.65 (2006: US$1.40).
At the year-end
• Total equity up 17.8 per cent to US$135,416 million (2006: US$114,928 million).
• Customer accounts and deposits by banks up 23.3 per cent to US$1,228,321 million (2006:
US$996,528 million).
• Risk-weighted assets up 19.7 per cent to US$1,123,782 million (2006: US$938,678 million).
Dividends and capital position
•
Total dividends declared in respect of 2007 of US$0.90 per share, an increase of 11.1 per cent
over dividends for 2006; fourth interim dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per share, an increase of
8.3 per cent.
• Tier 1 capital ratio of 9.3 per cent and total capital ratio of 13.6 per cent.
Dividends per share1
(US dollars)
Return on average invested capital
(per cent)
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
0.87
0.76
0.69
0.63
0.60
Earnings per share
(US dollars)
1.65
1.40
1.36
1.18
0.84
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2007
2006
2005
2004
13.7
Cost efficiency ratio
(per cent)
49.4
15.3
14.9
15.0
15.9
51.3
51.2
51.6
1 Dividends declared in the year per ordinary share.
Data for 2004 to 2007 are presented based on financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs; data for 2003 in accordance with
UK GAAP. Further information about the results is given in the consolidated income statement on page 337.
1
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Highlights (continued)
Ratios / 5-year comparison
Capital and performance ratios
Capital ratios
Tier 1 capital ......................................................................................................................................
Total capital .......................................................................................................................................
Performance ratios
Return on average invested capital1 ...................................................................................................
Return on average total shareholders’ equity2 ...................................................................................
Post-tax return on average total assets ..............................................................................................
Post-tax return on average risk-weighted assets ...............................................................................
Credit coverage ratios
Loan impairment charges as a percentage of total operating income ...............................................
Loan impairment charges as a percentage of average gross customer advances ..............................
Total impairment allowances outstanding as a percentage of impaired loans at the year-end .........
Efficiency and revenue mix ratios
Cost efficiency ratio3 .........................................................................................................................
As a percentage of total operating income:
– net interest income .....................................................................................................................
– net fee income ............................................................................................................................
– net trading income ......................................................................................................................
Financial ratio
Average total shareholders’ equity to average total assets ...............................................................
2007
%
9.3
13.6
15.3
15.9
0.97
1.95
19.61
1.97
104.9
49.4
43.1
25.1
11.2
5.69
2006
%
9.4
13.5
14.9
15.7
1.00
1.93
15.05
1.39
98.5
51.3
49.2
24.5
11.7
5.97
Share information at the year-end
US$0.50 ordinary shares in issue (million) .......................................................................................
Market capitalisation (billion) ...........................................................................................................
Closing market price per ordinary share:
2007
11,829
US$198
2006
11,572
US$212
– London ........................................................................................................................................
– Hong Kong .................................................................................................................................
Closing market price per American Depositary Share4 .....................................................................
£8.42
HK$131.70
US$83.71
£9.31
HK$142.40
US$91.65
HSBC total shareholder return to 31 December 20075 ...................................
Benchmarks:
– FTSE 1006 ................................................................................................
– MSCI World7 ............................................................................................
95.6
107.4
108.1
111.3
148.4
140.8
158.8
194.6
182.0
Over 1 year
Over 3 years
Over 5 years
For footnotes, see page 4.
The consolidated financial statements of HSBC and the separate financial statements of HSBC Holdings have been prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRSs’) as endorsed by the European Union (‘EU’). EU-endorsed IFRSs may differ
from IFRSs as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’) if, at any point in time, new or amended IFRSs have
not been endorsed by the EU. At 31 December 2007, there were no unendorsed standards effective for the year ended 31 December 2007
affecting these consolidated and separate financial statements, and there was no difference between IFRSs endorsed by the EU and IFRSs
issued by the IASB in terms of their application to HSBC. Accordingly, HSBC’s financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2007
are prepared in accordance with IFRSs as issued by the IASB.
Information for 2003 has been prepared under previous HSBC policies in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (‘UK GAAP’), which are not comparable with IFRSs.
HSBC uses the US dollar as its presentation currency because the US dollar and currencies linked to it form the major currency bloc
in which HSBC transacts its business. Unless otherwise stated, the information presented in this document has been prepared in
accordance with IFRSs.
When reference to ‘underlying’ or ‘underlying basis’ is made in tables or commentaries, comparative information has been expressed
at constant currency (see page 131) and adjusted for the effects of acquisitions and disposals. A reconciliation of reported and underlying
profit before tax is presented on page 15.
2
Five-year comparison
For the year
Net interest income ...................................
Other operating income ............................
Loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ............................
Provisions for bad and doubtful debts ......
Total operating expenses ..........................
Profit before tax ........................................
Profit attributable to shareholders of the
parent company ....................................
Dividends ..................................................
At the year-end
Called up share capital ..............................
Total shareholders’ equity ........................
Shareholders’ funds ..................................
Capital resources10 ....................................
Customer accounts ....................................
Undated subordinated loan capital ...........
Preferred securities and dated
subordinated loan capital11 ...................
Loans and advances to customers12,13 .......
Total assets ................................................
Per ordinary share
Basic earnings ...........................................
Diluted earnings ........................................
Dividends14 ...............................................
Net asset value at year-end .......................
Share information
US$0.50 ordinary shares in
Amounts in accordance with
IFRSs8
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
34,486
35,584
(10,573)
–
(33,553)
22,086
15,789
8,769
5,786
108,352
–
127,074
896,834
3,219
42,642
868,133
1,860,758
31,334
30,370
(7,801)
–
(29,514)
20,966
15,081
7,750
5,667
92,432
–
105,449
739,419
3,474
35,856
740,002
1,501,970
Amounts in
accordance with
UK GAAP9
2003
US$m
25,598
15,474
–
(6,093)
(22,532)
12,816
8,774
6,532
5,481
–
74,473
74,042
573,130
3,617
2004
US$m
31,099
24,889
(6,191)
–
(26,487)
18,943
12,918
6,932
5,587
85,522
–
90,780
693,072
3,686
32,914
672,891
1,279,974
17,580
528,977
1,034,216
US$
US$
US$
1.40
1.39
0.76
9.24
1.36
1.35
0.69
8.03
1.18
1.17
0.63
7.66
US$
0.84
0.83
0.60
6.79
2007
US$m
37,795
49,806
(17,242)
–
(39,042)
24,212
19,133
10,241
5,915
128,160
–
152,640
1,096,140
2,922
49,472
981,548
2,354,266
US$
1.65
1.63
0.87
10.72
issue (millions) ......................................
11,829
11,572
11,334
11,172
10,960
%
%
%
54.3
1.00
15.7
–
5.97
50.7
1.06
16.8
–
5.96
53.4
1.14
16.3
–
6.35
–
–
–
9.4
13.5
9.0
12.8
8.9
12.0
%
60.6
1.01
–
13.0
–
7.06
8.9
12.0
0.509
0.759
0.543
0.797
0.581
0.847
0.550
0.805
0.517
0.733
0.546
0.805
0.560
0.793
0.612
0.885
Financial ratios
Dividend payout ratio15 ............................
Post-tax return on average total assets .....
Return on average total shareholders’
equity ....................................................
Return on average shareholders’ funds ....
Average total shareholders’ equity to
average total assets ...............................
Average shareholders’ funds to
average total assets ...............................
Capital ratios
Tier 1 capital .............................................
Total capital ..............................................
Foreign exchange translation rates to
US$
Closing – £:US$1 ....................................
– €:US$1 .....................................
Average – £:US$1 ....................................
– €:US$1 .....................................
For footnotes, see page 4.
%
52.7
0.97
15.9
–
5.69
–
9.3
13.6
0.498
0.679
0.500
0.731
3
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Highlights (continued)
Cautionary statements
Footnotes to ‘Financial Highlights’
1 The definition of return on average invested capital and a reconciliation to the equivalent GAAP measures are set out on page 12.
2 The return on average total shareholders’ equity is defined as profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company divided by
average total shareholders’ equity.
3 The cost efficiency ratio is defined as total operating expenses divided by net operating income before loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions.
4 Each American Depositary Share (‘ADS’) represents five ordinary shares.
5 Total shareholder return is defined on page 12.
6 The Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index.
7 The Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index.
8 Data for 2004 exclude the provisions of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4, which were adopted for the first time with effect from 1 January
2005.
9 Data for 2003 were prepared in accordance with previous HSBC accounting policies under UK GAAP. HSBC’s accounting policies
under UK GAAP are stated in Note 2 on the Financial Statements in the Annual Report and Accounts 2004.
10 Capital resources are total regulatory capital, the calculation of which is set out on page 286.
11 Includes perpetual preferred securities, details of which can found in Note 32 on the Financial Statements.
12 Net of suspended interest and provisions for bad and doubtful debts (UK GAAP).
13 Net of impairment allowances (IFRSs).
14 Dividends recorded in the financial statements are dividends per ordinary share declared in a year and are not dividends in respect of,
or for, that year. First, second and third interim dividends for 2007, each of US$0.17 per ordinary share, were paid on 6 July 2007, 4
October 2007 and 18 January 2008 respectively. Note 12 on the Financial Statements provides more information on the dividends
declared in 2007. On 3 March 2008 the Directors declared a fourth interim dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per ordinary share in lieu of
a final dividend, which will be payable to ordinary shareholders on 7 May 2008 in cash in US dollars, or in pound sterling or Hong
Kong dollars at exchange rates to be determined on 28 April 2008, with a scrip dividend alternative. The reserves available for
distribution at 31 December 2007 were US$15,551 million.
Quarterly dividends of US$15.50 per 6.20 per cent non-cumulative US dollar preference share, Series A (‘Series A dollar preference
share’), equivalent to a dividend of US$0.3875 per Series A ADS, each of which represents one-fortieth of a Series A dollar preference
share, were paid on 15 March 2007, 15 June 2007, 15 September 2007 and 15 December 2007.
15 Dividends per share expressed as a percentage of earnings per share (2003: excluding goodwill amortisation).
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Annual Report and Accounts 2007 contains
certain forward-looking statements with respect to
the financial condition, results of operations and
business of HSBC.
Statements that are not historical facts, including
statements about HSBC’s beliefs and expectations,
are forward-looking statements. Words such as
‘expects’, ‘anticipates’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’,
‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘potential’ and ‘reasonably
possible’, variations of these words and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements are based on current
plans, estimates and projections, and therefore undue
reliance should not be placed on them. Forward-
looking statements speak only as of the date they are
made, and it should not be assumed that they have
been revised or updated in the light of new
information or future events.
Written and/or oral forward-looking statements
may also be made in the periodic reports to the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
summary financial statements to shareholders, proxy
statements, offering circulars and prospectuses, press
releases and other written materials, and in oral
statements made by HSBC’s Directors, officers
or employees to third parties, including financial
analysts.
Forward-looking statements involve inherent
risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned that a
number of factors could cause actual results to differ,
in some instances materially, from those anticipated
or implied in any forward-looking statement. These
factors include, among others:
•
changes in general economic conditions in the
markets in which HSBC operates, such as:
–
–
–
–
continuing or deepening recessions and
employment fluctuations;
changes in foreign exchange rates, in both
market exchange rates (for example,
between the US dollar and pound sterling)
and government-established exchange rates
(for example, between the Hong Kong
dollar and US dollar);
volatility in interest rates;
volatility in equity markets, including in the
smaller and less liquid trading markets in
Asia and Latin America;
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
lack of liquidity in wholesale funding
markets;
illiquidity and downward price pressure in
national real estate markets, particularly
consumer-owned real estate markets;
the emergence of structural inflationary
pressures from rising energy, raw material,
food and labour costs particularly in
emerging economies experiencing strong
domestic growth and capacity constraints;
the impact of lower than expected
investment returns on the funding of private
and public sector defined benefit pensions;
the effect of unexpected changes in
actuarial assumptions on longevity which
would influence the funding of private and
public sector defined benefit pensions; and
consumer perception as to the continuing
availability of credit, and price competition
in the market segments served by HSBC.
•
changes in governmental policy and regulation,
including:
–
the monetary, interest rate and other
policies of central banks and other
regulatory authorities, including the UK
Financial Services Authority, the Bank of
England, the Hong Kong Monetary
Authority, the US Federal Reserve, the US
Securities and Exchange Commission, the
US Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, the European Central Bank, the
People’s Bank of China and the central
banks of other leading economies and
markets where HSBC operates;
–
expropriation, nationalisation, confiscation
of assets and changes in legislation relating
to foreign ownership;
–
–
–
–
–
–
initiatives by local, state and national
regulatory agencies or legislative bodies
to revise the practices, pricing or
responsibilities of financial institutions
serving their consumer markets;
changes in bankruptcy legislation in the
principal markets in which HSBC operates
and the consequences thereof;
general changes in governmental policy that
may significantly influence investor
decisions, in particular markets in which
HSBC operates;
other unfavourable political or diplomatic
developments producing social instability or
legal uncertainty which in turn may affect
demand for HSBC’s products and services;
the costs, effects and outcomes of
regulatory reviews, actions or litigation,
including any additional compliance
requirements; and
the effects of competition in the markets
where HSBC operates including increased
competition from non-bank financial
services companies, including securities
firms.
•
factors specific to HSBC:
–
the success of HSBC in adequately
identifying the risks it faces, such as the
incidence of loan losses or delinquency, and
managing those risks (through account
management, hedging and other
techniques). Effective risk management
depends on, among other things, HSBC’s
ability through stress testing and other
techniques to prepare for events that cannot
be captured by the statistical models it uses.
5
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review
Group Chairman’s statement
Group Chairman’s statement
2007 was a year when large parts of the international
financial system came under extraordinary strain.
For HSBC to achieve another new high in earnings,
despite these conditions and the exceptionally weak
performance of our US business, underscores the
value of the strategic focus we announced early last
year to drive sustainable growth by concentrating on
the faster growing markets of the world.
Pre-tax profits in 2007 increased by 10 per cent
to US$24 billion and earnings per share rose by
18 per cent to US$1.65. Excluding the dilution gains
arising from our strategic investments in mainland
China, which I highlighted at the interim stage,
profits grew by 5 per cent. Consistent with our
strategy of focusing on emerging markets where we
are the world’s leading international bank, profits
from those businesses, excluding dilution gains,
grew by 41 per cent to US$15 billion.
Our return on shareholders’ equity exceeded
15 per cent, revenue growth was in double digits for
the fifth year running, our cost efficiency ratio
improved and our capital ratios remained strong.
HSBC’s financial strength in terms of both capital
and liquidity is a powerful driver of sustainable
growth and helps ensure continued resilience.
Strong operating performance in 2007
We produced exceptionally strong results in Asia-
Pacific, Latin America and the Middle East while
facing considerable business challenges in North
America. In our customer groups, we also achieved
record results in Commercial Banking and Private
Banking, and a strong performance in Global
Banking and Markets, despite write-downs arising
from market turbulence in the second half of the
6
year. In addition, Personal Financial Services
produced record profits in emerging markets. Within
these customer groups, our insurance operations
made further progress.
Our North American results continue to be
adversely affected by high loan impairment charges
as we respond to the impact on our portfolio of credit
deterioration arising largely from housing market
weakness in the US. The management team has
taken vigorous action to address and mitigate the
problem. In Europe, excluding the positive effect of
movements in the fair value of HSBC’s own debt,
performance was broadly in line with 2006. In the
UK, Commercial Banking generated pre-tax profits
of over US$2 billion for the first time and, in Turkey,
further expansion of the branch network helped drive
strong organic growth in numbers of personal and
business customers.
Financial strength underpins our progressive
dividend policy
The Directors have declared a fourth interim
dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per ordinary share (in
lieu of a final dividend) which, together with the first
three interim dividends for 2007 of US$0.17 already
paid, will make a total distribution in respect of the
year of US$0.90 per share (US$0.81 per share in
respect of 2006), an increase of 11.1 per cent. The
dividend will be payable on 7 May 2008 with a scrip
dividend alternative, to shareholders on the register
on 25 March 2008. HSBC’s dividend has increased
by 10 per cent or more every year for 15 years.
A clear and compelling strategy playing to
our strengths
At the beginning of 2007, we refreshed our strategy,
considering how we should shape HSBC for the
future. Our deliberations were influenced by some
fundamental long-term trends that will shape
tomorrow’s world: emerging markets will continue
to grow faster than mature ones; world trade will
continue to grow faster than world output; and
people are living longer than ever before with all the
implications that has for long-term savings and
pensions.
Our thinking was also informed by a clear
appreciation of HSBC’s strengths. We believe that
the global leadership we have built in emerging
markets and in trade, and our international
perspective, are compelling advantages that set
HSBC apart for our customers, our shareholders and
our people.
As we explained in March 2007, our conclusion
was that the Group should place renewed emphasis
on investing in fast moving emerging markets in
Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Latin America. We
believe we can grow strongly and sustainably. We
achieved our position as the number one
international bank in Asia-Pacific and the Middle
East over many years; by contrast, we have built one
of Latin America’s largest financial services
businesses in little more than a decade.
In mature markets, we are determined to focus
our businesses on areas where we can build on our
unique global franchise, so as to benefit from the
long-term trend of increasing international
connectivity. We have international customer bases
across many of our businesses, from the largest
corporates, through to small or medium-sized
enterprises, to the internationally mobile mass
affluent and other personal customers with specific
international requirements. We have developed a
clear approach which is enabling our business to
focus strongly on these groups of customers now and
in the years ahead.
Where opportunities arise, we shall seek to
redeploy capital towards emerging markets through
divestment of assets of greater strategic value to
others. In France, we have received a firm cash offer
of US$3.1 billion for our seven, separately branded,
regional banks and have entered into exclusive
discussions. This potential transaction, which is
subject to necessary approvals and consultation,
could complete in mid-2008. We remain committed
to France through our HSBC-branded network
serving retail and commercial customers and through
our activities in Global Banking and Markets,
Private Banking, asset management and insurance.
During 2007, we acquired the 50 per cent of Erisa,
our French insurance business, which we did not
own.
We will also build businesses, in both our
emerging and mature markets, that help our
customers with their long-term savings needs, as
demographics and wealth creation trends around the
world make this ever more important to them.
Finally, we will shape our business operations so
that we use our scale to deliver better, more efficient
services to our customers. Their use of technology
increasingly dictates how they interact with us. We
increasingly employ technology to create better
products which we can deliver globally at lower
cost. As we grow our direct banking business, we
will create opportunities to meet more of our
customers’ financial needs.
7
Building on our position as the world’s
leading international emerging markets
bank
During 2007, we continued to build our businesses
in emerging markets organically. For example, on a
like-for-like basis, risk-weighted assets in these areas
grew by 42 per cent compared with 16 per cent for
the Group as a whole.
As the leading international bank in the country
of our birth, China, we were delighted to be among
the first to incorporate locally in the mainland. We
have built the largest branch network of any
international bank and we have significant and
profitable strategic investments in our Chinese
associates.
In mainland China, through our own businesses
and in conjunction with our associates, we achieved
for the first time in our history a profit before tax of
over US$1 billion, in addition to over US$7 billion
generated in Hong Kong.
As China continues to reshape itself as a
21st century powerhouse, HSBC seeks to play a
constructive role in its continued progressive
economic and social development. We were the first
international bank to establish and open a rural bank.
Hang Seng Bank has agreed to acquire 20 per cent of
Yantai City Commercial Bank in the fast growing
Bohai region of China.
Elsewhere in Asia-Pacific, we have sought to
further strengthen our position through a series of
investments in faster-growing economies. In South
Korea, we have agreed to acquire 51 per cent of
Korea Exchange Bank for US$6.5 billion, subject to
regulatory approvals. In Taiwan, we acquired
Chailease Credit Services, a factoring company
serving commercial customers, and agreed to acquire
the assets, liabilities and operations of The Chinese
Bank, which will extend our network by 39 branches
and bring us many new customers.
As foreign investment rules are eased, we have
made significant investments to expand our business
in Vietnam with the acquisition of a further 5 per
cent interest in Techcombank, bringing our stake
to 14.4 per cent, and the purchase for some
US$255 million of a 10 per cent interest in Bao Viet,
the leading insurance company in the country.
The latter investment reflects our determination
to increase the contribution of insurance to Group
earnings. We also entered into agreements to invest
in a 26 per cent interest in a new life insurance joint
venture in India, in partnership with two of the larger
state-owned banks, and to acquire just under 50 per
cent of Hana Life Insurance Company in South
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Group Chairman’s statement
Korea. We have entered a number of strategic
alliances to ensure that we have the best products for
our customers and the support to grow our activities.
A fifth consecutive year of rising oil prices
facilitated growth in public and private investment
in the Middle East. As a result, infrastructure
development accelerated and consumption and
employment rose. Our businesses in the Middle East
were well positioned to benefit from this and have
had an excellent year.
Our acquisition of Grupo Banistmo in Central
America and Banco Nazionale in Argentina in 2006
strengthened our existing business. 2007 has been a
year of integrating these operations. It is a testimony
to the strength of our Latin American businesses that
we have been able to grow profits by 26 per cent to
over US$2 billion while investing in the integration,
and despite the increase in loan impairment charges
in Mexico as our loan portfolio began to mature.
A people business
It is people, of course, who define an organisation;
and any business’s success is dependent on the
calibre of its staff. 2007 was a demanding year in
many respects and it is testament to the talent and
professionalism of my 330,000 colleagues around
the world that HSBC successfully met its challenges
and excelled in so many areas. I would like to take
this opportunity to extend my personal thanks to my
colleagues – their commitment and expertise have
greatly benefited the Group and our shareholders.
them. We have set ourselves challenging targets to
increase both employee and customer engagement.
They will help us build on our position as the
world’s number one global banking brand.
Changes to your Board
Independent oversight of our company and of the
execution of strategy is the responsibility of one of
the most experienced and international Boards in the
world. I am delighted that we will benefit from
international business leaders of the calibre of José
Luis Durán and Sam Laidlaw, who joined the Board
as independent non-executive Directors on 1 January
2008. We also welcome two other global business
leaders, Safra Catz and Narayana Murthy, who will
join as independent non-executive Directors on
1 May 2008.
The Board will be further strengthened by the
appointment of three executive directors: Vincent
Cheng, effective 1 February 2008; and Sandy
Flockhart and Stuart Gulliver, who will join the
Board, effective 1 May 2008. These are three of our
most talented and experienced executives - all
emerging market specialists.
Baroness Dunn, Sir Brian Moffat and Lord
Butler will retire as non-executive Directors at
HSBC’s Annual General Meeting on 30 May 2008
and will not seek re-election. I should like to pay
tribute to their tremendous contribution to HSBC.
We have been privileged to enjoy their counsel and
stewardship for so many years.
Measuring the results of our strategy
HSBC’s core strength in uncertain times
Today we are publishing, for the first time, the key
metrics which we will use to measure our
performance in future. These include a number of
measures that cover financial performance, customer
recommendation and employee engagement.
In financial terms we are aiming for a return
on equity in a range over the investment cycle of
15-19 per cent; a cost efficiency ratio in the range
of 48-52 per cent; Tier 1 capital under the Basel II
framework of 7.5-9.0 per cent; and total shareholder
return in the top half of that achieved by our peers.
Financial measures are important but not
sufficient: it is our people and our relationship with
customers that will drive our business and ultimately
determine our success. For the first time, in 2007,
290,000 HSBC colleagues completed our new global
people survey, allowing us to benchmark ourselves
and, over time, raise our game. Similarly, we have
established customer engagement metrics which
enable us to measure and improve our service to
The outlook for the rest of 2008 is uncertain. The
economic slowdown and the credit outlook in the US
may well get worse before they get better. With
significant parts of the international financial system
in developed markets still in difficulty, HSBC’s
emphasis on faster growing emerging markets means
that we are better positioned than many of our
competitors.
Emerging markets have only partly decoupled
from the US. Hence, while these economies are
exhibiting more domestic momentum, they will not
be entirely immune from the impact of a US
slowdown. However, the major long-term trends are
still intact. Emerging markets will continue to
outperform mature economies; and world growth,
even in this year of relative weakness for the US
economy, will be reasonable – albeit slower than in
2007. Meanwhile, trade and investment patterns will
continue to evolve to reflect a more interconnected
world, notwithstanding some signs of protectionist
sentiment in several key mature markets. In
8
particular, we will see further strategic investments
from emerging markets into mature markets, as well
as into other emerging markets, a trend from which
we are well placed to benefit.
2008 is likely to be a year of caution in the
financial sector until liquidity, transparency and the
proper pricing of risk return to financial markets. We
expect to be able to improve margins on the use of
our capital and we will continue to invest in building
market presence at a time when others with weaker
capital positions are constrained.
The fundamentals of HSBC are very strong. The
deleveraging of the financial system clearly plays to
HSBC’s strengths, given our conservative balance
sheet and international presence. There can be few
banks in the world that are better positioned to
withstand market turbulence and grasp strategic
opportunities. We will continue to focus HSBC on
the parts of the global economy that promise the best
prospects for higher growth over the long term.
We will continue to invest for profitable growth in
line with our strategy, and we will do so while
maintaining HSBC’s financial strength, which is
at the heart of our success.
S K Green, Group Chairman
3 March 2008
9
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Principal activities / Strategic direction / KPIs
Principal activities .......................................
Strategic direction .......................................
Key performance indicators ........................
Reconciliation of reported and underlying
Page
10
10
11
profit before tax .......................................
Customer groups and global businesses ......
Personal Financial Services ....................
Commercial Banking ...............................
Global Banking and Markets ..................
Private Banking .......................................
Other .......................................................
Analysis by customer group and global
14
16
17
21
25
28
31
33
business ................................................
36
Geographical regions ..................................
36
Summary of geographical regions ...........
37
Competitive environment .........................
42
Europe .....................................................
59
Hong Kong ..............................................
72
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
91
Latin America .......................................... 110
Other information ....................................... 126
Products and services .............................. 126
Property ................................................... 129
Legal proceedings ................................... 129
Principal activities
HSBC is one of the largest banking and financial
services organisation in the world, with a market
capitalisation of US$198 billion at 31 December
2007.
Through its subsidiaries and associates, HSBC
provides a comprehensive range of banking and
related financial services. Headquartered in London,
HSBC operates through long-established businesses
and has an international network of some 10,000
properties in 83 countries and territories in five
geographical regions: Europe; Hong Kong; Rest of
Asia-Pacific, including the Middle East and Africa;
North America and Latin America. Within these
regions, a comprehensive range of financial services
is offered to personal, commercial, corporate,
institutional, investment and private banking clients.
Services are delivered primarily by domestic banks,
typically with large retail deposit bases, and
consumer finance operations. Taken together, the
five largest customers of HSBC do not account for
more than one per cent of HSBC’s income.
The principal acquisitions made during the year
are described on page 415. There were no significant
disposals.
10
Strategic direction
HSBC’s strategic direction reflects its position as
‘The world’s local bank’, combining the largest
global emerging markets banking business and a
uniquely cosmopolitan customer base with an
extensive international network and substantial
financial strength.
The Group’s strategy is aligned with key trends
which are shaping the global economy. In particular,
HSBC recognises that, over the long-term, emerging
markets are growing faster than developed
economies, world trade is expanding at a greater rate
than GDP and life expectancy is lengthening
everywhere. Against this backdrop, HSBC’s strategy
is focused on delivering superior growth and
earnings over time by building on the Group’s
heritage and skills. Its origins in trade in Asia have
had a considerable influence over the development
of the Group and, as a consequence, HSBC has
established a longstanding presence in many
countries. This local knowledge and international
breadth is supported by a substantial financial
capability founded on balance sheet strength.
HSBC is, therefore, reshaping its business by
investing primarily in the faster growing emerging
markets and, in developed markets, focusing on
businesses which have international connectivity.
Central to these activities is the maintenance of
HSBC’s financial strength and continued investment
in the business.
The Group has identified three main business
models for its customer groups and global businesses
that embody HSBC’s areas of natural advantage:
•
•
•
businesses with international customers for
whom emerging markets connectivity is crucial
– Global Banking and Markets, and Private
Banking;
businesses with local customers where
efficiency can be enhanced through global scale
– the small business segment of Commercial
Banking and the mass affluent segment of
Personal Financial Services; and
products where global scale is possible through
building efficiency, expertise and brand – global
product platforms such as cards and direct
banking.
The means of executing the strategy, and further
integrating the company, are clear:
•
the HSBC brand and global networks will be
leveraged to reach new customers and offer
further services to existing clients;
•
•
efficiency will be enhanced by taking full
advantage of local, regional and global
economies of scale in particular by adopting
a common systems architecture; and
appropriate objectives and incentives will be
adopted to motivate and reward staff for being
fully engaged in delivering the strategy.
Key performance indicators
The Board of Directors and the Group Management
Board monitors HSBC’s progress against its strategic
objectives. Progress is assessed by comparison with
the Group’s strategy, its operating plan targets and its
historical performance using both financial and non-
financial measures.
As a prerequisite for the vesting of performance
shares, the Remuneration Committee must satisfy
itself that HSBC’s financial performance has shown
a sustained improvement in the period since the
award date. In determining this, the Remuneration
Committee takes into account HSBC’s financial
performance with regard to the financial key
performance indicators (‘KPIs’) described below.
For awards made since 2005, the financial KPIs are
Financial KPIs – trend analysis
compared with the same group of 28 comparator
banks as for the total shareholder return (‘TSR’)
performance condition.
Financial KPIs
To support the Group’s strategy and ensure that
HSBC’s performance can be monitored,
management utilises a number of financial KPIs. The
table below presents these KPIs for the period from
2004 to 2007. At a business level, the KPIs are
complemented by a range of benchmarks which are
relevant to the planning process and to reviewing
business performance.
HSBC is publishing a number of key targets
against which future performance can be measured.
Financial targets have been set as follows: the return
on average total shareholders’ equity over the
medium term has been set at 15-19 per cent; the cost
efficiency ratio has been set in the range of 48-52 per
cent; and the TSR in the top half of that achieved by
peers. The cost efficiency ratio has been set as a
range within which the business is expected to
remain in order to accommodate the need for
continued investment in support of future business
growth.
2007
%
2006
%
2005
%
200410
%
20.8
13.4
12.2
–
47.8
27.9
24.3
49.4
6.0
15.3
11.1
1.65
15.9
52.8
26.3
20.9
51.3
6.3
14.9
11.0
1.40
15.7
54.4
25.1
20.5
51.2
6.3
15.9
10.6
1.36
16.8
60.6
25.2
14.2
51.6
6.8
15.0
10.0
1.18
16.3
Revenue growth1 ...........................................................................................
Revenue mix2
Net interest income ..................................................................................
Net fee income .........................................................................................
Other income3 ...........................................................................................
Cost efficiency4 .............................................................................................
Credit performance as measured by risk adjusted margin5 ..........................
Return on average invested capital6 .............................................................
Dividends per share growth7 ........................................................................
Earnings per ordinary share8 (US$)...............................................................
Return on average total shareholders’ equity9 ..............................................
Total shareholder return
HSBC TSR .........................
Benchmarks:
– FTSE 100 ........................
– MSCI World ....................
Over
1 year
Over
3 years
Over
5 years
95.6
111.3
158.8
107.4
108.1
148.4
140.8
194.6
182.0
1 The percentage increase in net operating income before loan impairment and other credit risk charges since the previous year.
2 As a percentage of net operating income before loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions.
3 Other income comprises net operating income before loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions less net interest income
and net fee income.
4 Total operating expenses divided by net operating income before loan impairment and other credit risk charges.
5 Net operating income divided by average risk-weighted assets.
6 Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders divided by average invested capital.
7 The percentage increase in dividends per share since the previous year, based on the dividends paid in respect of the year to which the
dividend relates.
8 Basic earnings per ordinary share is defined in Note 13 on the Financial Statements.
9 The return on average total shareholders’ equity is defined as profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company divided by the
average total shareholders’ equity.
10 Presentational changes introduced under IFRSs on 1 January 2005 distort comparison of 2004 data with succeeding years.
11
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
KPIs
Revenue growth provides an important guide
to the Group’s success in generating business.
In 2007, total revenue grew by 20.8 per cent to
US$79.0 billion, 13.5 per cent on an underlying
basis, reflecting HSBC’s expansion into new
products and markets, improved brand recognition
and refinements in segmentation to better meet
customer needs. The trend maintained the strong
performance in 2006 when the underlying increase
was 10.5 per cent. Higher revenue was largely driven
by balance sheet growth and strong contributions
from faster-growing economies. Fair value gains also
helped revenue growth. These gains were primarily
driven by a widening of credit spreads on debt issued
by HSBC Holdings and its subsidiaries and
designated at fair value. The movements will reverse
over the life of the debt unless it is repaid before its
contractual maturity.
Revenue mix represents the relative distribution
of revenue streams between net interest income,
net fee income and other revenue. It is used to
understand how changing economic factors affect
the Group, to highlight dependence on balance sheet
utilisation for income generation and to indicate
success in cross-selling fee-based services to
customers with loan facilities. This understanding
assists management in making business investment
decisions. Comparison of the revenue mix since
2005 shows a clear trend of net fee income
increasing at a faster rate than net interest income.
The percentage of revenue attributable to net interest
income fell from 52.8 per cent in 2006 to 47.8 per
cent in 2007. Net fee income grew by 1.6 percentage
points to 27.9 per cent.
Cost efficiency is a relative measure that
indicates the consumption of resources in generating
revenue. Management uses this to assess the success
of technology utilisation and, more generally, the
productivity of the Group’s distribution platforms
and sales forces. The cost efficiency ratio for
2007 improved over the previous two years
notwithstanding the continued investment in HSBC’s
businesses, particularly in emerging markets, and in
improving the Group’s distribution and technology
platforms.
Credit performance as measured by risk-
adjusted margin is an important gauge for assessing
whether credit is correctly priced so that the returns
available after recognising impairment charges meet
the Group’s required return parameters. The ratio
for 2007 was 6.0 per cent, showing a decrease of
0.3 percentage points over 2006. The marginal
decrease arose from the significant credit losses in
the US, partly offset by the increase in income
12
mainly generated from the faster-growing
economies.
Return on average invested capital measures
the return on the capital investment made in the
business, enabling management to benchmark HSBC
against competitors. In 2007, the ratio of 15.3 per
cent was 0.4 percentage points higher than that
reported in 2006. This increase reflected the fact that
profitability grew faster than the capital utilised in
generating the profit. The main drivers were the
higher income generated, mainly in the faster-
growing economies, which was not consumptive of
capital, and the fair value adjustment on the
widening of credit spreads on debt issued by HSBC
Holdings and its subsidiaries. Dilution gains of
US$1.1 billion made on investments in HSBC’s
associates also made a positive contribution towards
the return on average invested capital ratio.
HSBC aims to deliver sustained dividend per
share growth for its shareholders. The dividend
growth for 2007, which is based on the year to which
the dividends relate (rather than when they were
paid), amounts to 11.1 per cent, a marginal increase
of 0.1 percentage points over 2006. This basis differs
from the disclosure in the five-year comparison on
page 3. HSBC has delivered a compound rate of
increase in dividends of 11.2 per cent per annum
over the past five years.
Basic earnings per share (‘EPS’) is a ratio that
shows the level of earnings generated per ordinary
share. EPS is one of two KPIs used in rewarding
employees and is discussed in more detail in the
Director’s Remuneration Report on page 325. EPS
for 2007 was US$1.65, an increase of 17.9 per cent
on 2006. This demonstrated the benefit of diversified
earnings as the losses in the US consumer finance
business were more than compensated for by strong
growth in other markets and products. In 2006, EPS
grew by 2.9 per cent over that reported in 2005.
Return on average total shareholders’ equity
measures the return on average shareholders’
investment in the business. This enables
management to benchmark Group performance
against competitors and its own targets. In 2007, the
ratio was 15.9 per cent or 0.2 percentage points
higher than in 2006. This is in line with
management’s target of achieving a range of
between 15 and 19 per cent.
Total shareholder return (‘TSR’) is used
as a method of assessing the overall return to
shareholders on their investment in HSBC, and is
defined as the growth in share value and declared
dividend income during the relevant period. TSR is a
key performance measure in rewarding employees.
In calculating TSR, dividend income is assumed to
be invested in the underlying shares. As the
comparator group includes companies listed on
overseas markets, a common currency is used to
ensure that TSR is measured on a consistent basis.
The TSR benchmark is an index set at 100 and
measured over one, three and five years for the
purpose of comparison with the performance of a
group of competitor banks which reflect HSBC’s
range and breadth of activities. The TSR levels at the
end of 2007 were 95.6, 111.3, and 158.8 over one,
three and five years respectively. HSBC’s TSR over
all above mentioned periods has underperformed the
benchmark. This is attributed largely to the impact
on the share price of the current weakness in the US
sub-prime mortgage business and investor
preference over this time for companies with smaller
market values, particularly those for which there is
the possibility of participating in domestic or
regional consolidation.
Management believes that financial KPIs must
remain relevant to the business so they may be
changed over time to reflect changes in the Group’s
composition and the strategies employed.
Non-financial KPIs
HSBC has chosen four non-financial KPIs which are
important to the future success of the Group in
delivering its strategic objectives. These non-
financial KPIs are currently reported internally
within HSBC on a local basis.
Employee engagement
Employee engagement is a measure of employees’
emotional and rational attachment to HSBC.
In 2007, HSBC conducted its first Global
People Survey. This comprised questions designed to
measure employee engagement levels consistently
across the Group. The survey covers HSBC’s entire
permanent global workforce, and responses were
received from almost 290,000 employees, a response
rate of 88 per cent.
The overall employee engagement index score
was 60 per cent. The 2008 target is 62 per cent.
Survey questions were grouped into twelve
dimensions. Employees rated HSBC above the
external global norms in all these dimensions. In two
dimensions, reputation and corporate responsibility,
employees rated HSBC as achieving the external
best in class norm. The survey results have been
shared with all employees and action plans are being
developed at all levels of the organisation.
13
Brand perception
The score for brand perception is set by data
from surveys that are conducted by accredited,
independent, third party organisations. A weighted
score card is used to produce an overall score on a
100 point scale which is then benchmarked against
HSBC's main competitors. The scores from each
market are weighted according to the risk adjusted
revenues earned in that market to obtain the overall
company score.
The 2007 brand scores for Personal Financial
Services and Commercial Banking were ahead of the
competitor averages by 6 and 7 points, respectively,
on a 100 point scale. The 2008 brand perception
target is to increase the gap to 9 points and 8 points,
respectively.
Customer satisfaction
HSBC has regularly conducted customer satisfaction
surveys in its main markets over many years. HSBC
now uses a consistent measure of customer
recommendation to gauge customer satisfaction with
the services provided by the Group's Personal
Financial Services business. This survey is also
conducted by accredited, independent, third party
organisations and the resulting recommendation
scores are benchmarked against competitors.
The 2007 customer recommendation score for
Personal Financial Services was ahead of the
competitor average by 1 point on a 100 point scale.
The 2008 target is to increase that gap to 2.5 points.
IT performance and systems reliability
HSBC tracks two key measures as indicators of IT
performance; namely, the number of customer
transactions processed and the reliability and
resilience of systems measured in terms of service
availability targets.
Number of customer transactions processed
The number of customer transactions processed is a
reflection of the increasing usage of IT in each of the
delivery channels used to service customers. Its aim
is to manage the rate of increase in customer
transaction costs effectively and ensure that
customer growth is enabled in the appropriate
channels. The transition of customer transactions
from labour intensive (branch, call centre and others)
to automated (credit card, internet, self-service and
other e-channels) is occurring. The following chart
shows the 2005, 2006 and 2007 volumes per
delivery channel:
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
KPIs / Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Customer transactions
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Branch/Call
Centre-Agent
Credit card
Internet
Self-Service
Terminal
Other
e-Channels
Others
(payment,
clearing, etc)
▓ 2005 ▓ 2006 ▓ 2007
in millions
The call centre, internet and self-service transaction numbers
for 2006 have been restated to align them with the definition of
customer transactions adopted in 2007.
Percentage of IT services meeting or exceeding
targets
HSBC’s IT function establishes with its end-users
agreed service levels for systems performance, such
as systems running 99.9 per cent of the time and
credit card authorisations within two seconds,
and monitors the achievement of each of these
commitments. The following chart reflects the
percentage of IT services meeting and/or exceeding
the agreed service targets. Overall results in Europe,
Hong Kong and Latin America were each affected
by a single month’s service issue, which skewed a
trend of flat or improving service performance.
Percentage of IT services meeting or exceeding
targets
100%
99%
98%
97%
96%
95%
94%
93%
92%
91%
90%
Europe
Hong Kong
Rest of
Asia-Pacific
North America
Latin America
▓ 2006 ▓ 2007
Reconciliation of reported and
underlying profit before tax
HSBC measures its performance internally on a like-
for-like basis, eliminating the effects of Group
currency translation gains and losses, acquisitions
and disposals and gains from the dilution of the
Group’s interests in associates, which distort the
year-on-year comparison. HSBC refers to this as its
underlying performance.
The tables below show the underlying
performance of HSBC for the year ended
31 December 2007 compared with the year ended
31 December 2006. Comparative information
comparing the years ended 31 December 2006 and
2005 is also set out below. Equivalent tables are
provided for each of HSBC’s customer groups and
geographical segments in their respective sections
below.
The main differences between HSBC’s reported
and underlying financial performances were:
• Foreign currency translation differences, mainly
due to the weakening of the US dollar, most
significantly in Europe due to the size of
HSBC’s operations in the UK. The Group’s
profit before tax for 2007 compared with 2006
increased by 10 per cent, of which the effect of
the change in foreign currency translation rates
accounted for 4 percentage points. The
equivalents for 2006 compared with 2005 were
5 per cent and 1 per cent, respectively.
• There were a number of acquisitions and
disposals that affected both comparisons. The
most significant were the acquisitions of Metris
Companies Inc. (‘Metris’) in North America in
December 2005; in Latin America, the
Argentine operations of Banca Nazionale del
Lavoro SpA (‘Banca Nazionale’) in May 2006
and Grupo Banistmo (now ‘HSBC Bank
Panama’) in November 2006; and HSBC’s
partner’s share in life insurer, Erisa S.A., and
property and casualty insurer, Erisa I.A.R.D.
(together now renamed ‘HSBC Assurances’) in
France in March 2007; and the deemed
disposals of the stakes in Ping An Insurance
(Group) Company of China, Limited (‘Ping An
Insurance’), Bank of Communications Limited
(‘Bank of Communications’) and Industrial
Bank Co. Limited (‘Industrial Bank’), as a
consequence of their making share offerings on
the domestic ‘A’ share market in mainland
China.
14
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
Reported
change
US$m
%
Underlying
change
%
HSBC
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 ...
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
34,486
17,182
13,698
65,366
1,086
750
733
2,569
35,572
17,932
14,431
67,935
791
6
1,060
1,857
1,432
4,064
3,705
9,201
37,795
22,002
19,196
78,993
(10,573)
(243)
(10,816)
(133)
(6,293)
(17,242)
Net operating income ....
54,793
2,326
57,119
1,724
2,908
61,751
Operating expenses ..........
(33,553)
(1,536)
(35,089)
(395)
(3,558)
(39,042)
Operating profit .............
21,240
Income from associates ...
846
Profit before tax .............
22,086
790
20
810
22,030
1,329
(650)
22,709
866
(41)
22,896
1,288
678
28
1,503
24,212
10
28
40
21
(63)
13
(16)
7
78
10
4
23
26
14
(58)
5
(10)
(3)
78
–
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
34,486
17,182
13,698
65,366
2,284
2,304
1,551
6,139
(2,375)
(10,573)
3,764
54,793
(3,264)
(33,553)
500
48
548
21,240
846
22,086
Reported
change
%
10
19
16
13
(36)
10
(14)
5
31
5
Underlying
change
%
7
16
13
11
(30)
8
(11)
2
7
3
605
263
27
895
(309)
586
(383)
203
144
347
HSBC
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 .....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
31,334
14,456
11,847
57,637
(7,801)
Net operating income ......
49,836
263
159
273
695
(88)
607
31,597
14,615
12,120
58,332
(7,889)
50,443
Operating expenses ..........
(29,514)
(392)
(29,906)
Operating profit ...............
20,322
Income from associates ...
644
Profit before tax ...............
20,966
215
10
225
20,537
654
21,191
For footnotes, see page 130.
15
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Customer groups > Summary / Business highlights
Customer groups and global
businesses
Summary
HSBC manages its business through two customer
groups, Personal Financial Services and Commercial
Banking, and two global businesses, Global Banking
and Markets (previously Corporate, Investment
Profit before tax
Banking and Markets), and Private Banking.
Personal Financial Services incorporates the Group’s
consumer finance businesses, reflecting their
increasing integration within mainstream financial
services around the world. The largest of these is
HSBC Finance Corporation (‘HSBC Finance’), one
of the leading consumer finance companies in the
US.
Personal Financial Services .....................
Commercial Banking ...............................
Global Banking and Markets ...................
Private Banking .......................................
Other1 .......................................................
2007
US$m
5,900
7,145
6,121
1,511
3,535
%
24.4
29.5
25.3
6.2
14.6
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
9,457
5,997
5,806
1,214
(388)
%
42.8
27.2
26.3
5.5
(1.8)
2005
US$m
9,904
4,961
5,163
912
26
%
47.2
23.7
24.6
4.4
0.1
24,212 100.0
22,086 100.0
20,966 100.0
1 ‘Other’ includes gains arising from dilution of interests in associates of US$1,092 million (2006 and 2005: nil) and fair value gains of
US$2,893 million (2006: US$81 million expense; 2005: US$406 million income) on HSBC’s own debt designated at fair value. The
remainder of the Group’s gain on own debt is included in Global Banking and Markets.
Total assets
Personal Financial Services ..........................................................................
Commercial Banking ....................................................................................
Global Banking and Markets ........................................................................
Private Banking ............................................................................................
Other .............................................................................................................
At 31 December
2007
US$m
588,473
261,893
1,375,240
88,510
40,150
%
25.0
11.1
58.4
3.8
1.7
2006
US$m
546,568
213,450
994,436
73,026
33,278
%
29.4
11.5
53.4
3.9
1.8
2,354,266 100.0
1,860,758 100.0
Basis of preparation
The results are presented in accordance with the
accounting policies used in the preparation of
HSBC’s consolidated financial statements. HSBC’s
operations are closely integrated and, accordingly,
the presentation of customer group data includes
internal allocations of certain items of income and
expense. These allocations include the costs of
certain support services and head office functions, to
the extent that these can be meaningfully attributed
to operational business lines. While such allocations
have been made on a systematic and consistent basis,
they necessarily involve a degree of subjectivity.
Where relevant, income and expense amounts
presented include the results of inter-segment
funding as well as inter-company and inter-business
line transactions. All such transactions are
undertaken on arm’s length terms.
16
Personal Financial Services
Strategic direction
Profit before tax
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Net interest income ...........
29,069
26,076
23,351
Net fee income ..................
11,742
8,762
7,313
Trading income excluding
net interest income .........
Net interest income on
trading activities .............
Net trading income5 ..........
Net income from financial
instruments designated
at fair value ....................
Gains less losses from
financial investments .....
Dividend income ...............
Net earned insurance
premiums .......................
Other operating income ....
38
140
178
391
220
611
360
214
574
1,333
739
574
351
55
78
31
19
16
8,271
387
5,130
782
4,864
729
Total operating income ..
51,386
42,209
37,440
Net insurance claims6 .......
(8,147)
(4,365)
(3,716)
Net operating income4 .....
43,239
37,844
33,724
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions .......................
(16,172)
(9,949)
(7,537)
Net operating income .....
27,067
27,895
26,187
Total operating expenses ..
(21,757)
(18,818)
(16,427)
Operating profit ..............
5,310
9,077
9,760
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...........
590
380
144
HSBC’s strategic direction in Personal Financial
Services is to use its global scale and local
knowledge to grow profitably in selected markets.
The strategy focuses on growth in:
– markets where HSBC has or can build or
acquire scale, particularly in Asia-Pacific, Latin
America, Turkey and the Middle East;
– markets where HSBC has scale, such as the UK
and Hong Kong;
– HSBC Premier customers, who appreciate the
benefits of a bank with strong international
connectivity; and
–
consumer finance, cards, direct banking and
other product families where HSBC has global
scale and competitive advantages.
Business highlights in 2007
• Pre-tax profits in Personal Financial Services
declined by 38 per cent to US$5.9 billion in
2007, 41 per cent on an underlying basis. This
was due to a US$6.2 billion increase in loan
impairment charges, of which US$5.2 billion
arose in the US, substantially all from the
consumer finance business. Excluding US
consumer finance, profit before tax increased by
18 per cent, 12 per cent on an underlying basis,
driven by exceptionally strong net operating
income growth in Asia and, to a lesser extent,
Latin America.
Profit before tax ..............
5,900
9,457
9,904
• As Asian stock markets grew in value during
By geographical region
Europe ............................
Hong Kong .....................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......
North America ...............
Latin America ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax .......................
Cost efficiency ratio ..........
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
1,581
4,212
760
(1,546)
893
5,900
1,909
2,880
477
3,391
800
9,457
%
%
24.4
50.3
42.8
49.7
1,932
2,628
377
4,181
786
9,904
%
47.2
48.7
US$m
US$m
US$m
customers (net) ...............
Total assets ........................
Customer accounts ............
464,726
588,473
450,071
448,545
546,568
388,468
398,884
484,314
321,240
For footnotes, see page 130.
2007, HSBC delivered a wider array of products
and services to meet demand. The increase in
activity was considerable; retail securities
transaction volumes in Hong Kong increased by
more than 160 per cent and income from
investment products in Asia by 150 per cent.
• HSBC Premier (‘Premier’), a global banking
and wealth management service for affluent
customers, was relaunched in September 2007
with a high-profile advertising campaign.
Premier offers a comprehensive and consistent
service to customers in 35 markets supported by
over 280 international Premier centres.
Customer reaction to the relaunch was very
positive with a net 340,000 joining the Premier
service in 2007, of which more than 50 per cent
were new to HSBC. At the end of the year there
were more than 2.1 million Premier customers
across the Group and gross revenue generated
per customer during 2007 averaged in excess of
US$2,000 per year.
17
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
• HSBC Direct, the Group’s online banking and
savings offering launched in the US in 2005,
continued to grow strongly in 2007. Now also
established in Taiwan, South Korea and Canada,
HSBC Direct will be introduced into further
markets in 2008. In the US, deposits reached
US$11.5 billion from over 620,000 customers,
an increase of 60 and 80 per cent, respectively,
since the end of 2006. In Asia, over 240,000
customers had deposited US$1.2 billion by
the end of 2007. Additional services were
introduced in South Korea in October, including
online overdrafts and time deposits. The most
recent launch of HSBC Direct was in Canada
in June 2007, with an enhanced local online
savings account. 45,000 customers, three
quarters of whom were new to HSBC, had
deposited over US$800 million by the end of
the year.
• The consequences of the downturn in the US
housing market, which began in 2006 and
accelerated during 2007, continued to affect
HSBC’s business in North America. It is now
clear that the US is experiencing one of the
deepest housing market corrections since the
Second World War, and the effects have spread
beyond their origins in the sub-prime mortgage
sector to the wider economy. Restricted
refinancing opportunities in a market of falling
house prices, negligible investor demand for
non-prime asset-backed securities and the
tightening of underwriting criteria by lenders
will continue to delay any recovery.
•
In 2006, HSBC was one of the first lenders in
North America to identify a problem in the US
mortgage sector. Consequently, in the second
half of 2006, HSBC began to contact customers
who were facing increased payments on their
adjustable-rate mortgages, tighten underwriting
criteria and, as credit conditions in the US
deteriorated further in 2007, HSBC took the
decision to cease correspondent mortgage
acquisitions and close Decision One Mortgage
Corporation (‘Decision One’), its wholesale
business. The size and value of the mortgage
services portfolio which encompasses both the
wholesale and correspondent businesses, is
now decreasing. Weaker credit conditions also
affected the consumer lending business and,
in the second half of 2007, HSBC stopped
underwriting certain products and reduced the
branch network to better align it with anticipated
demand.
businesses. The HSBC Insurance brand was
launched along with several insurance initiatives
across Asia; these are discussed below.
• HSBC’s cards in force globally exceeded
120 million at the end of 2007, an increase of
6 per cent. 26 per cent were in emerging markets
compared with 20 per cent in 2006, reflecting
HSBC’s strategic focus there. Around three
quarters of HSBC’s cards in force are now on a
single global system, part of the One HSBC
suite of common Group IT systems.
• HSBC continued to expand its consumer finance
business in Asia. In India, the Group opened an
additional 18 consumer finance branches and
loan centres, more than doubling customer
numbers. In Indonesia, HSBC opened 36 new
consumer finance centres in 2007, taking the
total to 64.
Europe
•
In the UK, HSBC invested significantly in its
distribution network to meet changing customer
demands for service. 52 new-style branches
were either opened or refurbished in a
programme which included both the relocation
of branches and the opening of new sites across
the country. 25 per cent of all face-to-face
customer contact occurred at these new-style
branches. This was supported by a significant
investment in self-service devices.
• HSBC’s focus on innovative competitive
liability products, together with consumer
confidence in the strength of the HSBC brand,
led to a 15 per cent rise in UK average savings
balances in 2007.
•
•
In March 2007, HSBC acquired its partner’s
share of insurer, HSBC Assurances, in France.
Integration began in the second half of the year,
and there was early evidence of good progress.
Sales of life-wrapped investment products
increased by 9 per cent year on year,
outperforming the market.
In Turkey, HSBC opened 45 new branches,
taking the total to 195. Strong organic growth
was driven by excellent customer acquisition,
with new customers rising by over 600,000.
Encouragingly, the cross-sell ratio continued
to improve, driven by a systematic after sale
follow-up process.
Hong Kong
•
In 2007, HSBC announced a strategy to
accelerate growth in the Group’s insurance
• Personal Financial Services had an outstanding
year in Hong Kong, with pre-tax profits rising
18
by 46 per cent. HSBC provided its customers
with an array of products and services, and with
the local stock exchange performing strongly in
2007, fee income from investment products
grew by 144 per cent and securities turnover by
167 per cent.
•
Insurance and retirement products were also a
significant driver of growth in Hong Kong.
HSBC launched a number of new products
during the year and became the leading provider
of single-premium life policies.
• As the popularity of internet banking continued
in Hong Kong, the proportion of all transactions
that were conducted outside the branch network
in 2007 was 96 per cent.
• HSBC consolidated its position as the largest
credit card issuer in Hong Kong. Cards in force
rose by 6 per cent to 4.9 million.
Rest of Asia-Pacific
•
In April 2007, HSBC was one of four foreign
banks to incorporate in mainland China. This
allowed HSBC to start providing a full range of
retail banking products, including local currency
services to domestic individuals, paving the way
for Personal Financial Services to become an
increasingly important part of HSBC’s business
in mainland China.
US sub-prime mortgage market by contacting,
throughout 2007, customers facing increased
payments on adjustable-rate mortgages. Since
inception of this programme in 2006, HSBC has
contacted over 41,000 customers and modified
10,300 loans with a value of US$1.6 billion. The
Group reduced the mortgage services portfolio
by US$13.3 billion in 2007, or 27 per cent, to
US$36.2 billion.
• HSBC Insurance launched a US direct channel
at the end of 2006, offering term life insurance
directly to consumers, which increased the
Group’s market share to 7 per cent of annualised
premiums.
• HSBC Direct continued to be an effective
alternative channel for gathering deposits and
reaching new customers, with more than 70 per
cent resident outside New York State. By the
end of the year, HSBC Direct in the US had
attracted US$11.5 billion of deposits. During
2007, two new complementary products were
launched, certificates of deposit and an online
payment account.
• The US retail bank opened 26 branches in 2007,
taking the total to 465, of which 17 per cent are
now outside the bank’s original geographic base.
The new branches helped aid the growth of
Premier in California, Florida and Connecticut.
• HSBC nearly doubled its branch network in
Latin America
mainland China during 2007. The new outlets
also included the first ever rural branch opened
by a foreign bank. At the end of the year HSBC
had more than 80 outlets in mainland China.
• During 2007, HSBC announced several
insurance initiatives in India, Vietnam, Taiwan,
mainland China, South Korea and the Middle
East. HSBC agreed to form a joint venture with
two local banks in India, and it entered into an
agreement to acquire almost 50 per cent of Hana
Life in South Korea. HSBC also acquired 10 per
cent of Bao Viet, a leading insurance company
in Vietnam. HSBC launched insurance
operations in Taiwan and an Islamic insurance
business in the Middle East.
• HSBC launched an online savings product in the
United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’) at the end of the
first quarter of 2007. By the end of the year,
almost 10,000 accounts had been opened and
more than US$500 million of deposits placed.
North America
• HSBC continued to address the problems in the
19
• HSBC continued to integrate HSBC Bank
Panama. Its acquisition in 2006 provided HSBC
with access to a market of 83 million people
across Central America and northern South
America. Investment in re-branding the acquired
branch network has begun.
• A buoyant market, combined with attentive
customer service and an expanded network in
Brazil, helped HSBC gain market share and
scale in core products. For example, credit cards
in force rose by 28 per cent and, in HSBC
Pension Funds, contributions grew by 39 per
cent compared with the market average of
23 per cent, positioning HSBC among the
top six in the market.
• Tu Cuenta, HSBC’s packaged account in
Mexico, continued to be successful with
1.3 million accounts at the end of 2007, a rise
of 29 per cent. Additionally, HSBC increased
its market share of credit cards in Mexico by
3.5 percentage points to 10 per cent.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
26,076
8,762
3,006
37,844
Personal Financial
Services
Net interest income .........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ..
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ...................
746
322
87
1,155
26,822
9,084
3,093
38,999
(9,949)
(205)
(10,154)
Net operating income ....
27,895
950
28,845
Operating expenses .........
(18,818)
(753)
(19,571)
Operating profit ............
9,077
Income from associates ..
380
Profit before tax ............
9,457
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
1,909
2,880
477
3,391
800
9,457
197
13
210
172
(12)
26
6
18
210
9,274
393
9,667
2,081
2,868
503
3,397
818
9,667
Personal Financial
Services
Net interest income .........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ...................
23,351
7,313
3,060
33,724
(7,537)
252
78
15
345
(80)
265
23,603
7,391
3,075
34,069
(7,617)
26,452
Net operating income ......
26,187
Operating expenses .........
(16,427)
(229)
(16,656)
Operating profit ..............
9,760
Income from associates ..
144
Profit before tax ..............
9,904
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
For footnotes, see page 130.
1,932
2,628
377
4,181
786
9,904
36
1
37
24
7
–
3
3
37
9,796
145
9,941
1,956
2,635
377
4,184
789
9,941
20
650
(24)
(91)
535
(72)
463
(283)
180
6
186
144
–
–
(6)
48
186
1,597
2,682
(574)
3,705
29,069
11,742
2,428
43,239
(5,946)
(16,172)
(2,241)
27,067
(1,903)
(21,757)
(4,144)
5,310
191
590
(3,953)
5,900
(644)
1,344
257
(4,937)
27
(3,953)
1,581
4,212
760
(1,546)
893
5,900
2006
as
reported
US$m
26,076
8,762
3,006
37,844
1,913
1,124
(94)
2,943
(2,031)
(9,949)
912
27,895
(1,815)
(18,818)
(903)
78
(825)
(41)
245
(59)
(977)
7
(825)
9,077
380
9,457
1,909
2,880
477
3,391
800
9,457
560
247
25
832
(301)
531
(347)
184
157
341
(6)
–
159
184
4
341
Reported
change
%
11
34
(19)
14
(63)
(3)
(16)
(42)
55
(38)
(17)
46
59
(146)
12
(38)
Reported
change
%
12
20
(2)
12
(32)
7
(15)
(7)
164
(5)
(1)
10
27
(19)
2
(5)
Underlying
change
%
6
30
(19)
10
(59)
(8)
(10)
(45)
49
(41)
(31)
47
51
(145)
3
(41)
Underlying
change
%
8
15
(3)
9
(27)
3
(11)
(9)
54
(8)
(2)
9
(16)
(23)
1
(8)
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
Commercial Banking
Profit before tax
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Net interest income ...........
9,055
Net fee income ..................
3,972
7,514
3,207
6,310
2,876
Trading income excluding
net interest income .........
Net interest income/
(expense) on trading
activities .........................
Net trading income5 ..........
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ..
Gains less losses from
financial investments .....
Dividend income ...............
Net earned insurance
premiums .......................
Other operating income ....
265
204
150
31
296
22
90
8
733
165
20
224
(22)
44
6
258
250
(3)
147
(12)
9
9
236
327
Total operating income ..
14,341
11,481
9,902
Net insurance claims6 .......
(391)
(96)
(118)
Net operating income4 .....
13,950
11,385
9,784
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions .......................
(1,007)
(697)
Net operating income .....
12,943
10,688
(547)
9,237
Total operating expenses ..
(6,252)
(4,979)
(4,453)
Operating profit ..............
6,691
5,709
4,784
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...........
454
288
177
Profit before tax ..............
7,145
5,997
4,961
2,516
1,619
1,350
920
740
7,145
2,234
1,321
1,034
957
451
5,997
%
%
29.5
44.8
27.2
43.7
1,939
955
818
892
357
4,961
%
23.7
45.5
By geographical region
Europe ............................
Hong Kong .....................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......
North America ...............
Latin America ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax .......................
Cost efficiency ratio ..........
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) ...............
Total assets ........................
Customer accounts ............
220,068
261,893
237,987
172,976
213,450
190,853
142,041
175,120
148,106
For footnotes, see page 130.
21
Strategic direction
HSBC’s Commercial Banking strategy is focused on
two key initiatives:
–
–
to be the leading international business bank,
using HSBC’s extensive geographical network
together with product expertise in payments,
trade, receivables finance and foreign exchange
to support customers’ trading and investing
across borders; and
to be the best bank for small businesses in target
markets, building global scale and creating
efficiencies by sharing best practices, including
in marketing and credit scoring, and selectively
rolling-out the direct banking model.
Commercial Banking enhances the customer
experience through a strong multi-channel approach
to customer relationships, leveraging HSBC’s IT
platforms and operational processing capabilities.
Additional value is captured through strong
connectivity with each of the other customer groups.
Business highlights in 2007
• Pre-tax profit increased by 19 per cent to
US$7.1 billion, with considerable growth in
both net interest income and net fee income. On
an underlying basis, pre-tax profit increased by
13 per cent.
• Growth was driven by strong results in Hong
Kong (up by 23 per cent on 2006), mainland
China (65 per cent), Mexico (69 per cent) and
the UAE (29 per cent). As a result, the share of
profits from faster-growing economies increased
from 47 per cent in 2006 to 52 per cent in 2007.
• Total customer numbers grew faster than in
previous years, by 8 per cent to 2.8 million,
driven by growth in the small business segment,
particularly in Turkey, Mexico, the UAE, the
UK and Hong Kong. The rise in customer
numbers helped drive an increase of 25 per cent
in deposits, particularly in Hong Kong and the
Rest of Asia-Pacific region.
• Lending growth of 27 per cent was also robust,
while loan impairment charges remained low at
less than 0.5 per cent of average assets.
underpinned the substantial expansion in Asia
and Latin America, the cost efficiency ratio was
broadly stable at 44.8 per cent. The number of
full-time equivalent employees in commercial
banking grew by 14 per cent to 26,000,
including nearly 7,400 relationship managers.
US$m
US$m
US$m
• Notwithstanding the investment which
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
Sales of Global Banking and Markets products
increased strongly, particularly in treasury
products which had revenue increases of over
30 per cent on an underlying basis and more
than 50 per cent in Asia.
Europe
• Expansion in Europe continued with the
broadening of product capabilities and
geographical reach. Receivables Finance was
launched in four countries and International
Banking Centres in a further seven. Investment
continued within Central and Eastern Europe,
especially in Poland, where HSBC now offers
services in six cities. Following receipt of a
retail banking licence in Russia in July 2007,
HSBC opened offices in two cities in addition to
Moscow.
•
In Turkey, rapid expansion continued with the
opening of a further 29 branches serving small
business customers and the ongoing recruitment
of experienced relationship managers. This
contributed to a 48 per cent rise in customer
numbers, particularly in small and micro
businesses. A number of investment banking
advisory and structured finance transactions
were referred to Global Banking and Markets
from Commercial Banking’s corporate and
mid-market business.
• Further segmentation was applied in the UK
with the expansion of multicultural banking,
including the UK’s first dedicated Polish
commercial banking unit. Following the
realignment of the relationship management and
distribution approach in commercial centres,
customer satisfaction improved by 8 percentage
points.
•
In the UK, 25 per cent more start-up businesses
chose HSBC for their banking than in 2006 and
nearly a quarter of all new small and micro
customers chose Business Direct accounts.
Improvements in internet banking led to a
30 per cent increase in the number of users and
resulted in recognition from independent
surveys for both customer usage and
functionality.
• HSBC continued to improve its capacity to meet
customers’ cross-border business requirements.
International Banking Centres covering a further
38 countries and territories were opened,
increasing their coverage to 54 countries and
nearly all of the customer base. Customer
experience was improved with the launch of
SmartForms (electronic account opening forms)
in 16 countries, the appointment of specialist
corporate international teams in the UK and
France and the creation of new country desks in
mainland China.
• The effect of these initiatives was demonstrated
by growth of 125 per cent in the number of
successful referrals through the Global Links
system, with aggregate transaction values
doubling to US$6 billion.
• HSBC’s success in its strategy to be the best
bank for small business was recognised with
awards in Hong Kong and the UK for the
Business Internet Banking (‘BIB’) platform, and
HSBC’s service quality was recognised with
multiple ‘Best Partner’ awards in Hong Kong
and the top ranking for overall satisfaction in the
Canadian Federation of Independent Business
survey.
• Direct channel capabilities were improved
through the upgrade of BIB platforms in Hong
Kong and in six countries in the Rest of
Asia-Pacific region, and the enhancement of
HSBCnet. A total of 800,000 customers are now
active users of BIB, an increase of 24 per cent in
2007, while the number of transactions on
HSBCnet grew during the year by 157 per cent
to 27 million.
• Commercial Banking continued to make
progress in meeting customers’ insurance
needs with product launches in Hong Kong
(FlexiCommercial, Privileged Term and Capital
Protection Plan) and the UK (Motor Fleet,
Professional Indemnity and High Risk
Liability). A number of further projects
with strategic partners are currently under
development for launch in 2008 in other
countries, including Brazil, France and Mexico.
• Commercial Banking continued to grow its
cross-referrals to and from other customer
groups. In the first half of 2007, over 50 per cent
of new small business customers in key markets
had existing Personal Financial Services
relationships. Referrals of Commercial Banking
customers to Private Banking resulted in
US$1.8 billion of assets under management.
22
Hong Kong
North America
•
•
In the US, HSBC’s payments and cash
management services won Euromoney’s ‘Best
Cash Management in North America’ award for
the second year running. The appointment of
dedicated resources underpinned strong growth
in cross-sales of treasury and debt products to
Commercial Banking customers.
Increased customer segmentation and the
reorganisation of branch roles in Canada
enabled larger mid-market and real estate
relationships to be managed centrally. Combined
with product enhancements in the payments and
cash management arena, such as six new
product launches and functionality
improvements across HSBCnet and BIB,
Commercial Banking grew strongly. For
example, fee income from cross-border
payments increased by 27 per cent.
Latin America
•
•
•
International Banking Centres now provide
services to all countries in Latin America, with
Mexico providing a regional hub for Central
America and Brazil for smaller South American
countries.
In Mexico, trade services revenues increased by
33 per cent and the number of customers grew
by 123 per cent. The receivables finance product
range was expanded and relaunched using
Group IT systems.
In Brazil, sales of products through electronic
and telephone channels increased by 95 per
cent, as new products were launched and the
number of customers using internet banking
rose to 117,000. The Segmento Empreendedor
product (local BusinessDirect) was launched in
Sao Paulo and Curitiba.
• HSBC’s service excellence was recognised by a
number of awards, notably ‘Best Bank’ in the
Euromoney 2007 Awards for Excellence and
‘Best SME (small and medium-sized enterprise)
Partner’ by three organisations.
• HSBC built on its longstanding reputation for
trade services with the launch of EasyTrade for
the small business segment. Other product
launches included FlexiInsurance and Green
Equipment Financing.
• The number of SME centres expanded from
eight to 10, and there was an increase in the
number of dedicated SME relationship
managers to nearly 100.
• New functionality was added to BIB, such as
forward contract booking and cheque status
enquiries. The number of active BIB users
increased by 43 per cent and the BIB service
was recognised with two awards, the ‘Best
Integrated Corporate Site for Asia’ from Global
Finance 2007 World’s Best Internet Banks
awards, and the ‘Best SME e-banking’ award
from SMB World magazine.
Rest of Asia-Pacific
• Trade and payments and cash management
revenues grew strongly, particularly in the UAE,
India and Vietnam, as HSBC positioned itself in
growing economies to benefit from the even
faster growth of intra-Asian trade flows. The
Greater China regional model was advanced by
the acquisition of Chailease Credit Services
Company Ltd (‘Chailease’) in Taiwan, which
expanded HSBC’s receivables finance business
and strengthened both domestic and
international trade capabilities. The integration
of branches from The Chinese Bank Co., Ltd.
(‘The Chinese Bank’) announced in December
2007, is expected to provide HSBC with a
presence in every major city in Taiwan,
contributing to the strategy for growth across
Greater China.
•
In the Middle East, new business banking units
were established in the UAE, Bahrain, Jordan,
Lebanon, Oman and Qatar, contributing to a
30 per cent growth in customers.
• Cross-sales of investment banking products
were strong in India and the Middle East,
including sukuk deals and two initial public
offerings (‘IPO’s). HSBC Amanah trade
products were introduced in Malaysia.
23
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
Commercial Banking
US$m
Net interest income .........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
7,514
3,207
664
Net operating income4 ..
11,385
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ...................
(697)
Net operating income ....
10,688
Operating expenses .........
(4,979)
Operating profit ............
5,709
Income from associates ..
288
Profit before tax ............
5,997
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
2,234
1,321
1,034
957
451
5,997
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
382
189
27
598
(47)
551
(291)
260
9
269
196
(6)
29
25
25
269
7,896
3,396
691
11,983
(744)
11,239
(5,270)
5,969
297
6,266
2,430
1,315
1,063
982
476
6,266
114
17
48
179
(61)
118
(73)
45
1
46
–
–
–
–
46
46
1,045
559
184
1,788
9,055
3,972
923
13,950
(202)
(1,007)
1,586
12,943
(909)
(6,252)
677
156
833
86
304
287
(62)
218
833
6,691
454
7,145
2,516
1,619
1,350
920
740
7,145
Reported
change
%
21
24
39
23
(44)
21
(26)
17
58
19
13
23
31
(4)
64
19
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
7,514
3,207
664
11,385
1,057
274
58
1,389
(127)
(697)
1,262
10,688
(419)
(4,979)
843
114
957
283
367
209
35
63
957
5,709
288
5,997
2,234
1,321
1,034
957
451
5,997
Reported
change
%
19
12
11
16
(27)
16
(12)
19
63
21
15
38
26
7
26
21
Commercial Banking
Net interest income .........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions .................. .
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses .........
Operating profit ..............
Income from associates ..
Profit before tax .............
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
For footnotes, see page 130.
6,310
2,876
598
9,784
(547)
9,237
(4,453)
4,784
177
4,961
1,939
955
818
892
357
4,961
123
43
(2)
164
(16)
148
(80)
68
3
71
18
(1)
7
30
17
71
24
14
10
48
(7)
41
(27)
14
(6)
8
(6)
–
–
–
14
8
6,433
2,919
596
9,948
(563)
9,385
(4,533)
4,852
180
5,032
1,957
954
825
922
374
5,032
24
Underlying
change
%
13
16
27
15
(27)
14
(17)
11
53
13
4
23
27
(6)
46
13
Underlying
change
%
16
9
10
14
(23)
13
(9)
17
63
19
14
38
25
4
17
19
Global Banking and Markets
Strategic direction
Profit before tax
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Net interest income ...........
4,430
Net fee income ..................
4,901
3,168
3,718
3,001
2,967
Trading income excluding
net interest income .........
Net interest income/
(expense) on trading
activities .........................
3,503
4,890
2,919
(236)
(379)
306
Net trading income5 ..........
3,267
4,511
3,225
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value ........................
Gains less losses from
financial investments .....
Dividend income ...............
Net earned insurance
premiums .......................
Other operating income ....
(164)
1,313
222
93
1,218
20
534
235
67
475
79
73
1,378
76
1,621
Total operating income ..
15,280
13,637
11,511
Net insurance claims6 .......
(70)
(62)
(54)
Net operating income4 .....
15,210
13,575
11,457
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other
credit risk provisions .....
(38)
119
272
Net operating income .....
15,172
13,694
11,729
Total operating expenses ..
(9,358)
(7,991)
(6,838)
Operating profit ..............
5,814
5,703
4,891
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...........
307
103
272
Profit before tax ..............
6,121
5,806
5,163
By geographical region
Europe ............................
Hong Kong .....................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......
North America ...............
Latin America ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax .......................
Cost efficiency ratio ..........
For footnotes, see page 130.
2,527
1,578
2,464
(965)
517
6,121
2,304
955
1,649
423
475
5,806
%
%
25.3
61.5
26.3
58.9
2,114
922
1,207
573
347
5,163
%
24.6
59.7
25
In 2007, the implementation of the ‘emerging
markets-led and financing-focused’ strategy was
completed and Corporate, Investment Banking and
Markets was renamed Global Banking and Markets.
HSBC’s strategy is to be a leading wholesale bank
by:
–
–
–
utilising HSBC’s extensive distribution
network;
developing Global Banking and Markets’ hub-
and-spoke business model; and
continuing to build capabilities in major hubs to
support the delivery of an advanced suite of
services to corporate, institutional and
government clients across the HSBC network.
Ensuring that this combination of product depth
and distribution strength meets the needs of existing
and new clients will allow Global Banking and
Markets to achieve its strategic goals.
Business highlights in 2007
• Pre-tax profit increased by 5 per cent to
US$6.1 billion, despite a total of US$2.1 billion of
write-downs on credit trading, leveraged and
acquisition financing positions, and monoline
credit exposures resulting from disruption and
deterioration in the credit markets. In North
America, the mortgage-backed securities
operation was closed to new business and was
downsized. Strong results were reported across
most other businesses with record revenues from
foreign exchange, equities, securities services,
payments and cash management, and HSBC
Global Asset Management. Pre-tax profit in Hong
Kong, Rest of Asia-Pacific and Latin America
rose by 48 per cent. The rise in operating expenses
reflected increased volumes in payments and cash
management and securities services. On an
underlying basis, pre-tax profits were broadly in
line with 2006.
• HSBC’s leading position in emerging markets and
financing was recognised by various industry
awards, including being named ‘Middle East
Mergers and Acquisitions Adviser of the Year’
and ‘Middle East Loan House of the Year’ by
Acquisitions Monthly and International Financing
Review, respectively. In the Euromoney 2007
Awards for Excellence, HSBC was named global
‘Best Risk Management House’, ‘Best Foreign
Exchange House in Asia’ and, for the tenth
consecutive year ‘Best Risk Management House
in Asia’.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
Management view of total operating income
•
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
20069
US$m
20059
US$m
Global Markets .................
Foreign exchange .........
Credit and Rates ...........
Structured derivatives ...
Equities10........................
Securities services ........
Global Banking .................
Financing and capital
5,074
2,178
(419)
647
742
1,926
4,836
5,533
1,552
1,334
874
397
1,376
3,907
3,982
1,233
947
511
336
955
3,437
markets .......................
2,832
2,249
2,179
Payments and cash
management ...............
1,632
1,257
Other transaction
services .......................
372
401
907
351
Balance sheet
management ..................
1,226
713
1,246
HSBC Global Asset
Management11 ...............
Principal Investments .......
Other12 ...............................
1,336
1,253
1,555
1,066
686
1,732
775
715
1,356
Total operating income .....
15,280
13,637
11,511
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to:
250,464
– customers (net) ..............
199,506
– banks (net) ....................
Total assets ........................ 1,375,240
Customer accounts ............
299,879
Trading assets, financial
210,220
156,548
994,436
235,965
169,435
106,123
755,056
202,361
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments ...................
Deposits by banks .............
For footnotes, see page 130.
674,647
126,395
487,943
92,954
373,787
65,853
•
In Global Markets, structured derivatives
continued to benefit from investment made in
technical expertise and systems in previous
years, notwithstanding the decline in income
from structured credit products. Foreign
exchange reported strong growth across all
regions. Positive revenue trends reflected higher
customer volumes against the backdrop of a
weakening US dollar and greater market
volatility, particularly in the second half of
2007. Equities recorded a significant increase
especially in Europe and particularly due to
HSBC’s differentiation in emerging markets
products. Securities services benefited from new
mandates and increased volumes in higher value
products, particularly in Asia, as clients
rebalanced their investment portfolios. Assets
under custody rose by 30 per cent.
26
In Global Banking, the credit market dislocation
led to a fair value write-down in respect of loan
commitments outstanding when credit spreads
widened in the second half of 2007, though robust
growth in fees resulting from a greater transaction
volume more than offset this. Asset and structured
finance also benefited from a small number of
significant transactions, while revenues in the
capital markets businesses were boosted by
greater market activity in Europe and Hong Kong.
The continued growth in payments and cash
management revenues reflected a rise in deposit
balances and higher transaction volumes across
most regions.
• HSBC advised on several notable cross-border
transactions, including Singapore
Telecommunications’ US$758 million acquisition
of a 30 per cent stake in Warid Telecom of
Pakistan; National Titanium Dioxide of Saudi
Arabia’s S$1.2 billion acquisition of Lyondell
Chemical’s inorganic chemicals business in the
US; and Dubai Drydocks’ S$650 million
acquisition of Pan-United Marine of Singapore.
• HSBC was lead arranger of US$9.2 billion of
facilities for the acquisition of GE Plastics by
Saudi Basic Industries; €2.25 billion for the
acquisition of Mölnlycke Health Care by Investor
AB; and £3.4 billion for the acquisition of
National Grid Wireless by Macquarie.
•
In debt capital markets, HSBC ranked first in
the Asian local currency bond league table
compiled by Bloomberg, first in the sterling
bond league table and fifth in the international
bond league table.
• The increase in balance sheet management
revenues was driven by higher spreads, and
arose principally from the recovery in Asia.
• Group Investment Businesses was rebranded as
HSBC Global Asset Management following a
closer alignment with other businesses within
Global Banking and Markets. A rise in income
was driven by continuing strong revenue growth
from emerging market products across all
regions and a notable increase in funds under
management. Successes included the development
of the global liquidity and multi-manager
businesses, established in late 2006 and early
2007, both of which have reported strong inflows
of new business. Funds under management rose
by 16 per cent to US$380 billion.
• Principal Investments reported significant gains
from a small number of realisations benefiting
from higher exit multiples.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
Global Banking and
Markets
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
2006
as
reported
US$m
3,168
3,718
6,689
Net operating income4 ...
13,575
Loan impairment
(charges)/recoveries
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
119
Net operating income ....
13,694
Operating expenses ..........
(7,991)
Operating profit .............
5,703
Income from associates ...
103
Profit before tax .............
5,806
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong ..................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .....
North America .............
Latin America ..............
2,304
955
1,649
423
475
5,806
175
182
360
717
6
723
(406)
317
(4)
313
202
(1)
67
21
24
313
3,343
3,900
7,049
14,292
125
14,417
(8,397)
6,020
99
6,119
2,506
954
1,716
444
499
6,119
25
9
10
44
–
44
(35)
9
2
11
–
–
–
–
11
11
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
3,001
2,967
5,489
Net operating income4 .....
11,457
Loan impairment
recoveries and other
credit risk provisions ...
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses ..........
Operating profit ...............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax ..............
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong ..................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .....
North America .............
Latin America ..............
For footnotes, see page 130.
272
11,729
(6,838)
4,891
272
5,163
2,114
922
1,207
573
347
5,163
21
2
3
26
(1)
25
(9)
16
(4)
12
(4)
–
–
–
16
12
34
31
108
173
9
182
(63)
119
7
126
86
2
19
14
5
126
3,035
2,998
5,597
11,630
281
11,911
(6,901)
5,010
279
5,289
2,200
924
1,226
587
352
5,289
27
Reported
change
%
40
32
(12)
12
Underlying
change
%
32
25
(17)
6
1,062
992
(1,180)
4,430
4,901
5,879
874
15,210
(163)
711
(926)
(215)
206
(9)
21
624
748
(1,409)
7
(9)
(38)
(132)
(130)
15,172
(9,358)
5,814
307
6,121
2,527
1,578
2,464
(965)
517
6,121
11
(17)
2
198
5
10
65
49
(328)
9
5
5
(11)
(4)
208
–
1
65
44
(317)
1
–
2006
as
reported
US$m
3,168
3,718
6,689
13,575
112
718
1,089
1,919
(161)
1,758
119
13,694
(1,081)
(7,991)
677
(172)
505
108
31
423
(164)
107
505
5,703
103
5,806
2,304
955
1,649
423
475
5,806
Reported
change
%
6
25
22
18
(56)
17
(17)
17
(62)
12
9
4
37
(26)
37
12
Underlying
change
%
4
24
19
17
(57)
15
(16)
14
(62)
10
5
3
35
(28)
30
10
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
Global Banking and
Markets
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
Private Banking
Profit before tax
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Net interest income ...........
1,216
Net fee income ..................
1,615
1,011
1,323
848
1,080
Trading income excluding
net interest income .........
Net interest income
on trading activities ........
Net trading income5 ..........
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ..
Gains less losses from
financial investments .....
Dividend income ...............
Other operating income ....
525
9
534
(1)
119
7
58
362
2
364
1
166
5
61
317
–
317
(1)
45
9
68
Total operating income ..
3,548
2,931
2,366
Net insurance claims6 .......
–
–
–
Net operating income4 .....
3,548
2,931
2,366
Loan impairment
(charges)/recoveries
and other credit risk
provisions .......................
Strategic direction
The strategy for Private Banking is to be one of the
world’s leading international private banks, by
providing excellent client service.
– HSBC’s global network and brand provides a
base from which Private Banking, working in
conjunction with HSBC’s other customer groups
and global businesses, serves the complex
international needs of its clients, utilising
traditional and innovative ways of managing
and preserving the wealth of high net worth
individuals while optimising returns.
– Private Banking aims to grow annuity revenue
streams through product leadership in areas
such as credit, hedge funds, emerging markets,
investment advice and estate planning. This
will be achieved by attracting, retaining and
motivating talented individuals, by close
communication with clients and employees
and by increasing expenditure targeted on IT,
marketing and brand awareness initiatives.
Private Banking’s onshore business and intra-
group partnerships will also be strengthened.
(14)
(33)
12
Business highlights in 2007
• Pre-tax profits increased by 24 per cent
or 22 per cent on an underlying basis to
US$1.5 billion, primarily due to an outstanding
performance in Hong Kong, and strong growth
in Switzerland and throughout the Americas.
• Approximately 3,500 inward referrals from
other customer groups in HSBC in 2007 resulted
in US$6 billion of net new money. In addition,
Global Banking and Markets mandated or
completed 34 transactions that originated in
Private Banking, on which fees for the Group
are expected to be US$70 million.
• HSBC Private Banking was awarded third best
‘Global Private Bank’ in the Euromoney survey,
for the third year running.
• Client assets increased by 26 per cent to
US$421.0 billion, of which US$35.9 billion
related to net new money, reflecting strong
investment performance and increased
marketing expenditure.
–
912
539
190
78
104
1
912
%
4.4
62.0
Net operating income ......
3,534
2,898
2,378
Total operating expenses ..
(2,025)
(1,685)
(1,466)
Operating profit ..............
1,509
1,213
912
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...........
2
1
Profit before tax ..............
1,511
1,214
By geographical region
Europe ............................
Hong Kong .....................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......
North America ................
Latin America ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax .......................
Cost efficiency ratio ..........
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
915
305
92
174
25
805
201
80
114
14
1,511
1,214
%
%
6.2
57.1
5.5
57.5
US$m
US$m
US$m
customers (net) ...............
Total assets ........................
Customer accounts ............
43,612
88,510
106,197
34,297
73,026
80,303
27,749
59,827
67,205
For footnotes, see page 130.
28
Client assets
Asia
• Private Banking in Asia had an excellent
year in 2007 on the back of strong equity
markets, wealth creation in the region and
continued recruitment of relationship managers.
Client assets increased by 38 per cent to
US$93.0 billion, of which US$12.9 billion
related to net new money.
• Private Banking clients were significant
investors in new offerings from HSBC including
the HSBC Multi-Alpha China Fund and HSBC
Nan Fung China Infrastructure Fund aimed at
taking advantage of strong economic growth in
mainland China.
• Onshore private banking in mainland China
received regulatory approval in December 2007,
and was launched in January 2008. The first
branches will be opened in Shanghai, Beijing
and Guangzhou.
• A savings product with returns linked to the
Hong Kong Stock Exchange (the Forward
Accumulator) was introduced by HSBC in Asia.
Americas
• HSBC continued to expand and improve its
business in North America. In January 2007,
Private Banking services were launched in
Canada, since when the business has contributed
US$8 million to Private Banking’s pre-tax
profits. In addition, a new Private Banking
office was opened in Washington.
• A strategic decision was made to exit the Wealth
and Tax Advisory Services business in order to
focus on core Private Banking activities. The
management buyout was completed on
31 December 2007.
• The domestic businesses in Brazil and Mexico
experienced strong growth as local
entrepreneurs launched IPOs and invested in
local markets. The acquisition of HSBC Bank
Panama facilitated the establishment of Private
Banking operations there.
• As a result of new operations in Canada and
Panama and client acquisition by the enlarged
franchise in the region, client assets increased
by 42 per cent to US$69.6 billion.
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
At 1 January .....................................
Net new money ................................
Value change ....................................
Exchange and other .........................
At 31 December ...............................
333
36
19
33
421
273
34
21
5
333
Client assets by investment class
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
Equities ............................................
Bonds ...............................................
Structured products ..........................
Funds ................................................
Cash, fiduciary deposits and
other ..............................................
At 31 December ...............................
81
64
12
123
141
421
62
55
16
83
117
333
• Total client assets, including some non-financial
•
assets held in client trusts, amounted to
US$494.1 billion at 31 December 2007. This
represented a 21 per cent increase over the
previous year. This measure is equivalent to
competitors’ assets under management figures.
In response to client demand, a number of new
investment products were launched in 2007
with particular emphasis on private equity
in emerging markets. Amanah Investment
Solutions, a shariah (Islamic law)-compliant
fund, was added to the successful range of
multi-manager fund solutions.
• Hedge fund services performed well. HSBC
Alternative Investments Ltd successfully
launched the HSBC Special Opportunities Fund
and earned a number of awards in 2007,
including ‘Hedge Fund of the Year’ at the UK
Pension Awards, and was shortlisted by the
Financial Times as the ‘Best Client Services’
provider.
Europe
• Private Banking further expanded its business in
the UK and Ireland with offices established in
Edinburgh and Dublin, taking the total number
of offices in Private Banking to 93.
• Client assets increased by 19 per cent to
US$258.4 billion, of which US$20.2 billion
related to net new money. This was driven by an
accumulation of wealth by entrepreneurs in the
region, a private banking franchise in most of
the major markets and expertise in Switzerland,
which remains a centre of excellence for private
wealth management.
29
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
US$m
Private Banking
Net interest income .........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ..
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ...................
1,011
1,323
597
2,931
(33)
Net operating income ....
2,898
Operating expenses .........
(1,685)
Operating profit ............
1,213
Income from associates ..
1
Profit before tax ............
1,214
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
805
201
80
114
14
1,214
24
32
7
63
–
63
(40)
23
–
23
22
–
–
–
1
23
1,035
1,355
604
2,994
(33)
2,961
(1,725)
1,236
1
1,237
827
201
80
114
15
1,237
2
4
1
7
–
7
(4)
3
–
3
–
–
–
–
3
3
179
256
112
547
19
566
(296)
270
1
271
88
104
12
60
7
271
1,216
1,615
717
3,548
(14)
3,534
(2,025)
1,509
2
1,511
915
305
92
174
25
1,511
Reported
change
%
20
22
20
21
58
22
(20)
24
100
24
14
52
15
53
79
24
Underlying
change
%
17
19
19
18
58
19
(17)
22
100
22
11
52
15
53
47
22
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
Private Banking
Net interest income .........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ....
Loan impairment
recoveries/(charges)
and other credit risk
provisions .................. .
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses .........
Operating profit ..............
Income from associates ..
Profit before tax ..............
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
For footnotes, see page 130.
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
162
239
155
556
(44)
512
(214)
298
1
299
262
9
3
12
13
299
848
1,080
438
2,366
12
2,378
(1,466)
912
–
912
539
190
78
104
1
912
1
4
4
9
(1)
8
(5)
3
–
3
4
2
(1)
(2)
–
3
849
1,084
442
2,375
11
2,386
(1,471)
915
–
915
543
192
77
102
1
915
30
Reported
change
%
19
23
36
24
Underlying
change
%
19
22
35
23
1,011
1,323
597
2931
(33)
(375)
(400)
2,898
(1,685)
1,213
1
1,214
805
201
80
114
14
1,214
22
(15)
33
–
33
49
6
3
10
1,300
33
22
(15)
33
–
33
48
5
4
12
1,300
33
Notes
• For a description of the main items reported
under ‘Other’, see footnote 8 on page 130.
• Dilution gains of US$1.1 billion were recorded
in the first half of 2007 following share
offerings made by three of HSBC’s associates:
Ping An Insurance, Bank of Communications
and Industrial Bank. Although HSBC’s holding
in these entities was diluted, its share of the
capital raised resulted in a gain. Similarly,
dilution gains of US$11 million and
US$5 million were recorded following share
issues made by Financiera Independencia, a
Mexican banking associate, and Techcombank
in Vietnam, respectively.
• Net income from financial instruments
designated at fair value of US$2.9 billion was
recorded in 2007, primarily driven by the
widening of credit spreads on debt issued by
HSBC Holdings and its subsidiaries in North
America and Europe, and designated at fair
value. These movements will reverse over the
life of the debt unless it is repaid before its
contractual maturity.
•
In 2006, the results of HSBC Insurance Brokers
were reported within Other. This contributed
US$591 million to net operating income before
loan impairment charges and US$363 million to
operating expenses. In 2007, these results were
reallocated to other customer groups.
• The number of countries using Group Service
Centres (‘GSCs’) increased to 31 following the
opening of six new centres in 2007. The GSCs
now have 30,000 employees in five countries in
Asia. Operating expenses at HSBC Technology
Services increased by 16 per cent, due to
increased demand for services from other Group
entities. Substantially all service provider costs
are recharged to the relevant customer groups
and revenue is reported under ‘Other operating
income’.
• HSBC made a US$73 million gain following
a change in the embedded value of HSBC
Assurances, an associate in France, prior to
the acquisition of its remaining share capital
by HSBC.
Other
Profit before tax
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Net interest expense ..........
Net fee income/(expense) ..
(542)
(228)
(625)
172
(472)
220
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest
income ............................
Net interest income/
(expense) on trading
activities .........................
Net trading income/
(expense)5 .....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ..
Gains less losses from
2,893
financial investments .....
83
Gains arising from
dilution of interests in
associates .......................
Dividend income ...............
Net earned insurance
premiums .......................
Other operating income ....
1,092
32
(21)
3,523
Total operating income ..
6,958
Net insurance claims6 .......
–
127
(228)
(90)
(1)
82
(13)
126
(146)
(103)
(81)
147
–
63
207
3,254
2,991
(181)
406
144
–
42
260
2,634
3,131
(179)
2,952
Net operating income4 .....
6,958
2,810
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions .......................
(11)
(13)
(1)
Net operating income .....
6,947
2,797
2,951
Total operating expenses ..
(3,562)
(3,259)
(2,976)
Operating profit/(loss) ....
3,385
(462)
(25)
Share of profit in joint
ventures and associates ..
150
Profit/(loss) before tax ....
3,535
By geographical region
Europe ............................
Hong Kong .....................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......
North America ...............
Latin America ................
1,056
(375)
1,343
1,508
3
3,535
74
(388)
(278)
(175)
287
(217)
(5)
(388)
%
%
51
26
(168)
(178)
94
165
113
26
%
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax .......................
Cost efficiency ratio ..........
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
14.6
51.2
(1.8)
116.0
0.1
100.8
US$m
US$m
US$m
customers (net) ...............
Total assets ........................
Customer accounts ............
2,678
40,150
2,006
2,095
33,278
1,245
1,893
27,653
507
For footnotes, see page 130.
31
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Business highlights / Profit/(loss) before tax
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
Reported
change
US$m
%
Underlying
change
%
Other
Net interest expense ........
Net fee income/(expense).
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ...
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ...................
(625)
172
3,263
2,810
(13)
Net operating income ....
2,797
Operating expenses .........
(3,259)
Operating profit/(loss) ..
Income from associates ..
Profit/(loss) before tax ..
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
(462)
74
(388)
(278)
(175)
287
(217)
(5)
(388)
(22)
25
77
80
3
83
(90)
(7)
2
(5)
(24)
2
17
–
–
(5)
(647)
197
3,340
2,890
(10)
2,880
(3,349)
(469)
76
(393)
(302)
(173)
304
(217)
(5)
(393)
–
–
1,092
1,092
–
1,092
–
1,092
(50)
1,042
(50)
–
1,081
–
11
1,042
105
(425)
3,296
2,976
(1)
2,975
(213)
2,762
124
2,886
1,408
(202)
(42)
1,725
(3)
2,886
(542)
(228)
7,728
6,958
(11)
6,947
(3,562)
3,385
150
13
(233)
137
148
15
148
(9)
833
103
3,535
1,011
1,056
(375)
1,343
1,508
3
3,535
480
(114)
368
795
160
1,011
16
(216)
99
103
(10)
103
(6)
589
163
734
466
(117)
(14)
795
(60)
734
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
Other
Net interest expense ........
Net fee income ................
Other income3 .................
Net operating income4 ....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses .........
Operating loss .................
Income from associates ..
Profit/(loss) before tax ....
By geographical region
Europe .........................
Hong Kong .................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....
North America ............
Latin America .............
For footnotes, see page 130.
–
–
(11)
(11)
–
(11)
–
(11)
(3)
(14)
(14)
–
–
–
–
(14)
(141)
(51)
57
(135)
(12)
(147)
(268)
(415)
27
(388)
(92)
8
187
(383)
(108)
(388)
(472)
220
3,204
2,952
(1)
2,951
(2,976)
(25)
51
26
(168)
(178)
94
165
113
26
(12)
3
13
4
–
4
(15)
(11)
(1)
(12)
(4)
(5)
6
1
(10)
(12)
(484)
223
3,217
2,956
(1)
2,955
(2,991)
(36)
50
14
(172)
(183)
100
166
103
14
32
Reported
change
%
(32)
(22)
2
(5)
Underlying
change
%
(29)
(23)
2
(5)
(625)
172
3,263
2,810
(13)
(1,200)
(1,200)
2,797
(3,259)
(5)
(10)
(5)
(9)
(462)
(1,748)
(1,153)
74
45
54
(388)
(1,592)
(2,771)
(278)
(175)
287
(217)
(5)
(388)
(65)
2
205
(232)
(104)
(53)
4
187
(231)
(105)
(1,592)
(2,771)
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other8
US$m
Analysis by customer group and global business
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data
Total
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income5 ....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Gains arising from dilution of
interests in associates .............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
29,069
11,742
Commercial
Banking
US$m
9,055
3,972
38
140
178
1,333
351
–
55
8,271
387
265
31
296
22
90
–
8
733
165
4,430
4,901
3,503
(236)
3,267
(164)
1,313
–
222
93
1,218
1,216
1,615
525
9
534
(1)
119
–
7
–
58
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
(5,433)
–
–
5,433
5,433
–
–
–
–
–
(3,912)
(3,912)
–
(542)
(228)
127
(1)
126
2,893
83
1,092
32
(21)
3,523
6,958
–
Total
US$m
37,795
22,002
4,458
5,376
9,834
4,083
1,956
1,092
324
9,076
1,439
87,601
(8,608)
78,993
Total operating income ............
51,386
14,341
15,280
3,548
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ..............
(8,147)
43,239
Loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions .....
(16,172)
(1,007)
(38)
Net operating income ...............
27,067
12,943
15,172
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit ........................
(21,757)
5,310
(6,252)
6,691
(9,358)
5,814
(391)
(70)
–
13,950
15,210
3,548
6,958
(3,912)
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax.................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets ..................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
(14)
3,534
(2,025)
1,509
2
1,511
%
6.2
57.1
(11)
–
(17,242)
6,947
(3,912)
61,751
(3,562)
3,385
150
3,535
%
14.6
51.2
3,912
(39,042)
–
–
–
22,709
1,503
24,212
%
100.0
49.4
US$m
590
5,900
%
24.4
50.3
454
7,145
%
29.5
44.8
307
6,121
%
25.3
61.5
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
464,726
588,473
450,071
220,068
261,893
237,987
250,464
1,375,240
299,879
43,612
88,510
106,197
2,678
40,150
2,006
981,548
2,354,266
1,096,140
199,506
674,647
126,395
33
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Customer groups > Profit/(loss) before tax
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data (continued)
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other8
US$m
Total
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income ............................
26,076
8,762
7,514
3,207
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/ (expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
391
220
611
739
78
31
5,130
782
204
20
224
(22)
44
6
258
250
3,168
3,718
4,890
(379)
4,511
20
534
235
73
1,378
1,011
1,323
362
2
364
1
166
5
–
61
Total operating income ...............
42,209
11,481
13,637
2,931
(4,365)
(96)
(62)
–
37,844
11,385
13,575
2,931
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
(9,949)
(697)
119
Net operating income .................
27,895
10,688
13,694
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) ................
(18,818)
9,077
(4,979)
5,709
(7,991)
5,703
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
(2,658)
–
–
2,658
2,658
–
–
–
–
(3,179)
(3,179)
–
(3,179)
Total
US$m
34,486
17,182
5,619
2,603
8,222
657
969
340
5,668
2,546
70,070
(4,704)
65,366
(625)
172
(228)
82
(146)
(81)
147
63
207
3,254
2,991
(181)
2,810
(13)
–
(10,573)
2,797
(3,179)
54,793
(3,259)
3,179
(33,553)
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets ..................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
(33)
2,898
(1,685)
1,213
1
1,214
%
5.5
57.5
(462)
74
(388)
%
(1.8)
116.0
380
9,457
%
42.8
49.7
288
5,997
%
27.2
43.7
103
5,806
%
26.3
58.9
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
448,545
546,568
388,468
172,976
213,450
190,853
210,220
994,436
235,965
34,297
73,026
80,303
2,095
33,278
1,245
156,548
487,943
92,954
34
–
–
–
21,240
846
22,086
%
100.0
51.3
US$m
868,133
1,860,758
896,834
Total
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income ............................
23,351
7,313
6,310
2,876
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other8
US$m
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/ (expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) ................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ..........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
3,001
2,967
2,919
306
3,225
67
475
79
76
1,621
848
1,080
317
–
317
(1)
45
9
–
68
11,511
2,366
(54)
–
11,457
2,366
272
11,729
(6,838)
4,891
272
5,163
%
24.6
59.7
12
2,378
(1,466)
912
–
912
%
4.4
62.0
360
214
574
574
19
16
4,864
729
37,440
(3,716)
33,724
(7,537)
26,187
(16,427)
9,760
144
9,904
%
47.2
48.7
150
(3)
147
(12)
9
9
236
327
9,902
(118)
9,784
(547)
9,237
(4,453)
4,784
177
4,961
%
23.7
45.5
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
(1,704)
–
–
1,704
1,704
–
–
–
–
(2,646)
(2,646)
–
(2,646)
Total
US$m
31,334
14,456
3,656
2,208
5,864
1,034
692
155
5,436
2,733
61,704
(4,067)
57,637
(472)
220
(90)
(13)
(103)
406
144
42
260
2,634
3,131
(179)
2,952
(1)
–
(7,801)
2,951
(2,646)
49,836
(2,976)
2,646
(29,514)
(25)
51
26
%
0.1
100.8
–
–
–
20,322
644
20,966
%
100.0
51.2
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
398,884
484,314
321,240
142,041
175,120
148,106
169,435
755,056
202,361
27,749
59,827
67,205
1,893
27,653
507
740,002
1,501,970
739,419
106,123
373,787
65,853
35
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Geographical regions > Summary > Competitive environment
Geographical regions
Summary of geographical regions
In the analysis of profit by geographical regions that follows, operating income and operating expenses include
intra-HSBC items of US$1,985 million (2006: US$1,494 million; 2005: US$938 million).
Profit before tax
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
Total assets7
2007
US$m
8,595
7,339
6,009
91
2,178
%
35.5
30.3
24.8
0.4
9.0
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
6,974
5,182
3,527
4,668
1,735
%
31.5
23.5
16.0
21.1
7.9
2005
US$m
6,356
4,517
2,574
5,915
1,604
%
30.3
21.5
12.3
28.2
7.7
24,212
100.0
22,086
100.0
20,966 100.0
Europe ...........................................................................................................
Hong Kong ...................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ......................................................................................
North America ..............................................................................................
Latin America ...............................................................................................
For footnote, see page 130.
Additional information on results in 2007 may be
found in the ‘Report of the Directors: Financial
Review’ on pages 131 to 191.
Europe
HSBC’s principal banking operations in Europe are
HSBC Bank plc (‘HSBC Bank’) in the UK, HSBC
France, HSBC Bank A.S. in Turkey, HSBC Bank
Malta p.l.c., HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) S.A.,
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt AG and HSBC
Guyerzeller Bank AG. Through these operations
HSBC provides a wide range of banking, treasury
and financial services to personal, commercial and
corporate customers across Europe.
Hong Kong
HSBC’s principal banking subsidiaries in Hong
Kong are The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited (‘The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation’) and Hang Seng Bank Limited
(‘Hang Seng Bank’). The former is the largest bank
incorporated in Hong Kong and is HSBC’s flagship
bank in the Asia-Pacific region. It is one of Hong
Kong’s three note-issuing banks, accounting for
more than 65 per cent by value of banknotes in
circulation in 2007.
36
At 31 December
2007
US$m
1,184,315
332,691
228,112
510,092
99,056
%
50.3
14.1
9.7
21.7
4.2
2006
US$m
828,701
272,428
167,668
511,190
80,771
%
44.6
14.6
9.0
27.5
4.3
2,354,266 100.0
1,860,758 100.0
Rest of Asia-Pacific (including the
Middle East)
HSBC offers personal, commercial, global banking
and markets services in mainland China, mainly
through its local subsidiary, HSBC Bank (China)
Company Limited (‘HSBC Bank China’), which was
incorporated in March 2007. The bank’s network
spans 18 major cities, comprising 18 branches and
44 sub-branches. Hang Seng Bank offers personal
and commercial banking services and operates 10
branches, 14 sub-branches and one representative
office in 10 cities in mainland China. HSBC also
participates indirectly in mainland China through
its three associates, Bank of Communications
(19.01 per cent owned), Ping An Insurance
(16.78 per cent) and Industrial Bank (12.78 per
cent), and has a further interest of 8 per cent in Bank
of Shanghai.
Outside Hong Kong and mainland China, HSBC
conducts business in 21 countries in the Asia-Pacific
region, primarily through branches and subsidiaries
of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation, with particularly strong coverage in
India, Indonesia, South Korea, Singapore and
Taiwan. HSBC’s presence in the Middle East is led
by HSBC Bank Middle East Limited (‘HSBC Bank
Middle East’), whose network of branches,
subsidiaries and associates has the widest coverage
in the region; in Australia by HSBC Bank Australia
Limited; and in Malaysia by HSBC Bank Malaysia
Berhad (‘HSBC Bank Malaysia’), which is the
largest foreign-owned bank in the country by
operating income and pre-tax profits. HSBC’s
associate in Saudi Arabia, The Saudi British Bank
(40 per cent owned), is the Kingdom’s sixth largest
bank by total assets.
North America
HSBC’s North American businesses are located in
the US, Canada and Bermuda. Operations in the US
are primarily conducted through HSBC Bank USA,
N.A. (‘HSBC Bank USA’) which is concentrated in
New York State, and HSBC Finance, a national
consumer finance company based in Chicago. HSBC
Markets (USA) Inc. is the intermediate holding
company of, inter alia, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.,
a registered broker and dealer of securities and a
registered futures commission merchant. HSBC
Bank Canada and The Bank of Bermuda Limited
(‘Bank of Bermuda’) operate in their respective
countries.
Latin America
HSBC’s operations in Latin America and the
Caribbean principally comprise HSBC México, S.A.
(‘HSBC Mexico’), HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.-Banco
Múltiplo (‘HSBC Bank Brazil’), HSBC Bank
Argentina S.A. (‘HSBC Bank Argentina’) and
HSBC Bank (Panama) S.A. (‘HSBC Bank Panama’),
formerly Grupo Banistmo S.A., which owns
subsidiaries in Costa Rica, Honduras, Colombia,
Nicaragua and El Salvador. HSBC is also
represented by subsidiaries in Chile, the Bahamas,
Peru, Paraguay and Uruguay and by a representative
office in Venezuela. In addition to banking services,
HSBC operates insurance businesses in Mexico,
Argentina, Brazil, Panama, Honduras and
El Salvador. In Brazil, HSBC offers consumer
finance products through its subsidiary, Losango.
Competitive environment
HSBC believes that open and competitive markets
are good for both local economies and their
participants. The Group faces very strong
competition in the markets it serves. In personal and
commercial banking, it competes with a wide range
of institutions including commercial banks,
consumer finance companies, retail financial service
companies, savings and loan associations, credit
unions, general retailers, brokerage firms and
investment companies. In investment banking,
37
HSBC faces competition from specialist providers
and the investment banking operations of other
commercial banks.
Regulators routinely monitor and investigate the
competitiveness of the financial services industry
(of which HSBC is a part) in a number of areas,
particularly in the UK and continental Europe.
HSBC’s policy is to co-operate and work positively
with all its regulators, providing data and perspective
on those issues which affect all financial service
providers both directly and through industry bodies.
Global factors
Market liquidity
The ‘credit crunch’ disruption in credit markets that
began in the latter half of 2007 is resulting in the
movement of assets back on to banks’ balance
sheets, absorbing capital and constraining banks’
ability to lend. The disruption has created an
imbalance between the supply and demand for
many classes of financial assets and has led to the
traditional buyers of debt adopting a very cautious
approach to the purchase of any securities which are
neither fully transparent in risk profile nor of assured
liquidity. Although this liquidity strain began in the
asset-backed securities markets, it has since spread
to more traditional investment classes. In this
environment, the scope for a bank to originate assets
beyond its capacity to hold them to term is limited
by its available capital and funding resources. This
environment is less disruptive to banks that fund
their lending through deposits than those that rely on
the securitisation markets for funding.
Progressive alignment of the capital adequacy
framework towards economic capital
As major banks move to the new Basel II capital
adequacy framework (see ‘Basel II’ on page 284),
their capital requirements will necessarily be more
closely matched with their risk profiles. In an
environment of economic uncertainty, many banks
may need to reduce lending due to forecast increases
in capital requirements arising from deterioration in
the quality of their credit risk exposures. This
reduction in risk appetite may potentially accelerate
the deterioration in credit quality as credit
availability is restricted during a downturn in the
economic cycle. When coupled with a lack of market
liquidity, this may lead to polarisation within the
banking system. Banks with greater capital and
liquidity resources are better placed to meet the
ongoing banking requirements of their customers
than other banks which are more constrained in this
regard.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Competitive environment
Advances in technology
Customer transaction volumes continue to grow at a
rate considerably ahead of the growth in underlying
balances or accounts, leading many banks to seek to
reduce unit costs per service transaction in order to
maintain margins. The deployment of automated
secure transaction channels requires significant
investment, providing a competitive advantage to
banks with larger scale. Despite widespread adoption
by both banks and customers of new distribution
channels, the expected reduction in volumes of
transactions through traditional channels has been
slow to materialise and many banking customers
continue to prefer to use them. The younger
generation of customers, however, tends to be more
comfortable with system-aided self-service,
particularly for savings accounts, credit cards and
simple investments. HSBC expects the sophistication
of products sold in direct channels and adoption rates
to increase, as the use of 24-hour self-service
channels, such as ATMs, internet, mobile, and voice
response units becomes increasingly commonplace.
Regulation
Initiatives such as Basel II, together with the
increasingly international scope of financial services,
have raised the level of cooperation between
regulatory authorities in different countries.
Enhanced understanding of how risks are originated
and dispersed in modern financial markets has
reinforced the need to address how best to regulate
the increasingly integrated and international nature
of banking and financial services; this has been
evidenced most recently in coordinated discussions
on the global liquidity disruption. In addition, the
enlargement of the EU, the introduction of the
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive
(‘MIFID’) and the continued effort to endorse
consistent standards and enforcement has
encouraged regulatory bodies to work together more
closely. Interaction and cooperation have led to
competitive and regulatory issues emerging in one
country rapidly being taken up in other jurisdictions.
Uniform global standards, however, continue to be
complicated by differing local interpretations, or
additional local regulation.
Regional factors
Europe
Across Europe, in all sectors, HSBC competes with a
growing range of institutions. These markets are
characterised by rapid innovation, margin
compression through competition and a constant
flow of new entrants. Regulators monitor the
financial services sector closely and conduct reviews
38
into the long-term evolution of the industry.
Legislators are enforcing legislation with the aim of
improving competition and protecting consumers.
In November 2007, the European Commission
announced that in order to improve the
competitiveness and efficiency of European retail
financial services markets, reviews would be
undertaken to improve customer choice and mobility
within the single market; better facilitate retail
insurance markets; achieve progress towards
adequate and consistent rules for the distribution of
retail investment products; and promote financial
education, financial inclusion and adequate redress
for consumers.
Following a long running investigation, the
Competition Directorate-General determined that
MasterCard’s multilateral interchange fees for cross-
border payment card transactions violate EU
competition rules. MasterCard has six months to
comply or respond. HSBC is fully engaged in the
case through its membership of MasterCard.
A number of key EU measures intended to
facilitate development of the single market and
increase competition came into effect during the
year; principally, transposition of the Markets in
Financial Instruments Directive in November 2007.
Implementation of phase 1 of the Single Euro
Payments Area programme occurred in January
2008.
UK
Financial services, including retail banking, is a
highly competitive sector in the UK, led by several
national and international institutions which compete
on both price and service quality. Domestic
acquisitions or mergers are limited. The sector is
closely regulated, and a series of investigations with
particular relevance to Personal Financial Services
remain in progress.
In July 2007, a group of seven banks (including
HSBC) and one building society announced that they
had agreed with the Office of Fair Trading (‘OFT’)
that the legal status and enforceability of certain of
the charges applied to their personal customers in
relation to unauthorised overdrafts should be tested
in the High Court. Certain preliminary issues in the
case came before the High Court in a trial starting
in January 2008 and this part of the case concluded
in February 2008. At the date of this report,
judgement in the case is awaited. The OFT is also
conducting a market study into competition for
personal current accounts.
The Competition Commission (‘CC’)
commenced an investigation into the payment
protection insurance (‘PPI’) market in February 2007
and published its Emerging Thinking document in
November 2007. Provisional findings are due in
May 2008 and the final report towards the end of the
year. Similarly, the Financial Services Authority
(‘FSA’) conducted the third phase of its review of
the sales processes and systems around the sale of
PPI policies and is now undertaking further
assessment of firms’ performance in this area.
In December 2007, the CC announced its
decision to lift the price controls imposed in 2003 on
HSBC and the other three largest banks providing
services to small and medium-sized enterprises in
the UK. This is expected to result in greater
competition and innovation within the market.
During 2007, the OFT continued to investigate
competition issues in connection with the setting of
multilateral interchange fees for domestic credit card
payments.
France
In 2007, interest rates in the eurozone increased
while growth in real estate investment stabilised.
Income tax relief on new personal real estate loans
was introduced following the presidential elections,
though potential benefits to customers were offset by
higher interest rates. Real estate mortgage loans
remained the primary product by which banks
attracted new customers and, as a result, competitive
pricing led to decreased margins.
The French government introduced various
fiscal incentives in the second half of 2007 which
reduced tax on overtime pay and introduced a cap on
the total tax paid by households at 50 per cent of
income. These measures increased the disposable
income of wealthier individuals who qualify for
HSBC Premier and Private Banking services.
The commercial treasury bills market contracted
and companies had difficulty obtaining facilities in
the second half of 2007 due to market uncertainty.
This trend is expected to continue in 2008.
Hong Kong
The lending market remained active in 2007,
initially driven by investment-related loans and,
subsequently, as interest rates declined and market
uncertainty increased, by property loans. A robust
labour market and rising household wealth supported
growth in consumer spending. As a result, demand
for personal loans and credit cards rose.
39
In the middle of 2007, downward pressure on
interest rates and an overall improvement in the
property market led to increased demand for
mortgages. Prices for high-end properties rose,
though competition in traditional mortgage products
remained fierce.
Rising equity markets stimulated sales of
investment products and related loans. After a lull in
demand in August and September, when disruption
to money markets intensified as the implications for
asset-backed securities of the growing credit crisis
were reassessed, the market experienced intense
volatility, accentuated by the possibility of a
recession in the US.
Funds were attracted to Hong Kong during the
year in anticipation of sustained appreciation of the
renminbi as well as a positive outlook for the
mainland Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong.
Deposit growth remained robust throughout the year
and the status of Hong Kong as the chief financial
centre to service the needs of businesses in Southern
China was enhanced.
Rest of Asia-Pacific
(including the Middle East)
The business environment in the region remained
highly competitive, notwithstanding increased
demand for credit in Asian countries partially
resulting from lower interest rates. In particular,
short-term interest rates in mainland China, India,
Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore were less than
the nominal Gross Domestic Product (‘GDP’)
growth rate.
Mainland China
The People’s Bank of China indicated that it would
continue to apply tight monetary policy to address
excess domestic liquidity, to curb lending and to
strengthen macro-economic conditions. Loan growth
in mainland China remained robust despite this
tightening and the benchmark one-year lending rate
increased to 7.47 per cent by the end of 2007. The
renminbi reserve requirement ratio for depository
financial institutions increased to 14.5 per cent.
India
Loan growth in 2007 slowed due to earlier monetary
tightening and adverse regulatory policies which
restricted the activities of recovery agents.
Aggressive growth strategies by several banks
compressed margins and reduced overall asset
quality.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Competitive environment
Middle East
The competitive environment in the Middle East
intensified during 2007 as the regional economy
prospered on the back of record oil prices, which
prompted a surge in infrastructure development and
construction activities. The Dubai International
Finance Centre and the Qatar Financial Centre
continued to attract a number of international
institutions to set up operations in the region,
particularly in the investment and private banking
sectors.
Islamic banking activities continued to grow as
a percentage of the market with the establishment of
two prominent banks during the year. A number of
competitor banks introduced innovative products and
launched reward programmes to attract and retain
customers.
Malaysia, South Korea, Indonesia and Taiwan
Competition in the Malaysian banking sector
remained high as average lending rates continued to
decline, despite no change to central bank policy.
Banks in South Korea faced increased funding costs
as they competed for deposits with securities firms
who offered competitive rates on cash management
accounts. Measures to cool the real estate sector also
resulted in deterioration of asset quality for loans
associated with real estate and construction. Loan
growth in Indonesia increased in late 2007, as the
central bank of Indonesia continued to ease
monetary policy. In Taiwan, loan demand increased
in 2007 although it remained relatively low.
North America
US
The Group’s principal US subsidiaries, HSBC Bank
USA and HSBC Finance, faced unprecedented shifts
and uncertainties in the credit environment as the US
housing market continued to deteriorate. This
precipitated significant changes in the competitor
landscape.
Increased payments on resetting adjustable-rate
mortgages (‘ARMs’), together with falling house
prices, led to turmoil in the mortgage industry as
deteriorating credit quality led to a loss of appetite
among buyers of securitised mortgages in the
secondary market. The contraction of this important
funding source undermined the business models of
many market participants and over 100 competitors
closed, declared bankruptcy or were taken over in
2007. Influences on the market for securitised
mortgages had consequential effects on broader
credit markets and resulted in a general tightening
40
of credit availability, with particular impact on
financial institutions exposed to sub-prime
residential mortgages. Illiquidity in the markets for
related credit derivatives impacted the valuation of
such instruments.
The remaining sub-prime mortgage providers
tightened underwriting standards and increased rates
to reduce volumes, as they were obligated to retain
originated loans. Previously, most of these loans had
been packaged and sold to third party investors on
the secondary market. Major market participants
acted to reduce the number of foreclosures resulting
from ARMs by offering modified loan terms to
customers in financial distress. These initiatives
were supported and encouraged by federal and state
regulators. HSBC was one of the first institutions to
take a lead in this respect.
Regulatory scrutiny of the credit card industry
increased in 2007 and, although no new major
legislation was announced, a number of institutions,
including HSBC, amended credit card terms and
changed certain charging practices, benefiting
customers but at a cost to lenders. Notwithstanding
this, credit card competition remained fierce
throughout 2007, with the launch of a number of
innovative new products including environmentally-
themed initiatives and online substitutes for
traditional cards.
Canada
In Canada, the six largest banks retained their
significant presence in the country’s financial
services industry. Markets remained competitive,
however, with largely equivalent products being
offered by banks, insurance companies and other
financial institutions. Canadian financial markets
felt the effects of the downturn in US residential
property markets as certain asset-backed commercial
paper conduits experienced difficulty funding their
obligations. A group of Canadian and international
banks established accords to support these vehicles.
Latin America
Mexico
In Mexico, the banking industry remained centred
around the five largest institutions (including
HSBC), which control 80 per cent of the banking
system’s assets. Penetration of the formal financial
system remained low compared with other
developing economies in the region, while
demographics indicated a young and growing
population. Bank financing to the private sector was
less than 20 per cent of GDP, indicating significant
room for growth. In this context, the overall banking
system continued to expand credit rapidly and loan
growth has exceeded 20 per cent per annum over the
last two years.
In 2007, eight new banking licences were
granted and over 350 non-bank intermediaries
entered the consumer market. An amendment to
legislation late in 2007 granted specialised banking
licenses with reduced regulatory requirements. This
is expected to further boost competitive forces.
Mexican banks faced additional legislation with
the imposition of tariff restrictions on deposit
account fees and ATM commissions. HSBC
continued to increase its market share in core
consumer, commercial and corporate banking
products, and sought to differentiate itself through
customer service. HSBC is well positioned to
capitalise on economic growth with its extensive
branch and ATM network.
Central America
HSBC has financial services operations in Panama,
El Salvador, Costa Rica, Honduras, Colombia and
Nicaragua. Central America’s banking industry has
attracted significant foreign investment in recent
years due to its expanding domestic economies. In
the last two years, a number of international groups
established major retail banking operations through a
series of purchases. In El Salvador and Costa Rica,
foreign banks and local governments own the
majority of banking institutions. Panama, Honduras
and Guatemala continued to be served by several
large, independent domestic banking institutions.
International banks operating in Central
America increased their presence and, hence, the
availability of reliable financing sources. These
banks are also expected to accelerate the adoption of
improved corporate and risk management practices
in the region, together with a more efficient
allocation of resources.
Brazil
In Brazil, the top ten banking groups accounted for
71 per cent of banking assets and 87 per cent of
branches, unchanged from 2006. These groups
include local state-owned banks, privately-owned
banks and large foreign banks (including HSBC).
Privately-owned banks continued to grow their
market share (from 57 per cent in 2006 to 62 per
cent in 2007), through consolidation and growth in
credit operations, due to the positive economic
conditions. Further consolidation took place when
Banco Santander acquired Banco Real as part of the
successful consortium bid for ABN Amro.
Total lending as a percentage of GDP was
35 per cent, remaining relatively low by international
standards. Improved access to financial services and
increased participation in the formal economy
indicate the potential for further growth in the
financial services sector.
Argentina
International financial groups and local banks with
largely equivalent product and service offerings
formed HSBC’s major competition in Argentina.
41
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > Profit / (loss) before tax
Europe
Profit/(loss) before tax by country within customer groups and global businesses
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Global
Banking &
Markets13
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
Year ended 31 December 2007
United Kingdom ...............................................
France15 .............................................................
Germany ...........................................................
Malta .................................................................
Switzerland .......................................................
Turkey ...............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year ended 31 December 2006
United Kingdom ...............................................
France15 .............................................................
Germany ...........................................................
Malta .................................................................
Switzerland .......................................................
Turkey ...............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year ended 31 December 2005
United Kingdom ...............................................
France15 .............................................................
Germany ...........................................................
Malta .................................................................
Switzerland .......................................................
Turkey ...............................................................
Other .................................................................
1,221
173
–
45
–
144
(2)
1,581
1,496
174
–
42
–
121
76
1,909
1,475
223
–
29
–
134
71
1,932
2,064
192
36
67
–
75
82
2,516
1,801
236
29
50
–
50
68
2,234
1,495
278
42
46
–
39
39
1,939
1,214
692
195
45
–
118
263
2,527
1,299
545
114
29
–
64
253
2,304
1,186
472
131
31
–
92
202
2,114
317
25
45
–
475
(1)
54
915
380
22
41
–
305
–
57
805
171
7
48
–
254
–
59
539
976
(49)
19
–
–
–
110
1,056
(185)
(107)
16
–
–
(18)
16
(278)
(47)
(147)
16
–
–
–
10
(168)
Loans and advances to customers (net) by country
United Kingdom ..............................................................................................
France15 ............................................................................................................
Germany ..........................................................................................................
Malta ................................................................................................................
Switzerland ......................................................................................................
Turkey ..............................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
For footnotes, see page 130.
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
326,927
81,473
6,411
4,157
13,789
7,974
11,544
452,275
2006
US$m
305,758
55,491
4,439
3,456
9,151
5,233
8,971
392,499
5,792
1,033
295
157
475
336
507
8,595
4,791
870
200
121
305
217
470
6,974
4,280
833
237
106
254
265
381
6,356
2005
US$m
245,004
43,772
3,349
2,794
7,312
3,787
6,519
312,537
42
Customer accounts by country
United Kingdom ..............................................................................................
France15 ............................................................................................................
Germany ..........................................................................................................
Malta ................................................................................................................
Switzerland ......................................................................................................
Turkey ..............................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Profit before tax
Europe
Net interest income ..........................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Net trading income ..........................................................................................
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ....................
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Dividend income ..............................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
Total operating income .................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders .
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ................................................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .............................
Net operating income ....................................................................................
Total operating expenses .................................................................................
Operating profit .............................................................................................
Share of profit/(loss) in associates and joint ventures ....................................
Profit before tax .............................................................................................
Share of HSBC’s profit before tax ..................................................................
Cost efficiency ratio ........................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
367,363
64,905
10,282
5,947
41,015
6,473
8,969
504,954
2006
US$m
318,614
43,372
11,607
4,529
30,062
4,140
7,041
419,365
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
7,746
8,431
6,943
1,226
1,326
171
4,010
1,193
31,046
(3,479)
27,567
(2,542)
25,025
(16,525)
8,500
95
8,595
%
35.5
59.9
2006
US$m
8,289
7,108
4,529
144
624
183
1,298
1,428
23,603
(531)
23,072
(2,155)
20,917
(13,871)
7,046
(72)
6,974
%
31.5
60.1
2005
US$m
246,723
39,359
8,393
3,760
26,984
3,493
5,488
334,200
2005
US$m
8,221
6,299
3,036
362
439
63
1,599
1,603
21,622
(818)
20,804
(1,929)
18,875
(12,639)
6,236
120
6,356
%
30.3
60.8
Year-end staff numbers (full-time equivalent) ................................................
82,166
78,311
77,755
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to customers (net) ...........................................................
Loans and advances to banks (net) ..................................................................
Trading assets, financial instruments designated at fair value and
financial investments16 ...............................................................................
Total assets ......................................................................................................
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
For footnotes, see page 130.
2007
US$m
452,275
104,527
445,258
1,184,315
87,491
504,954
At 31 December
2006
US$m
392,499
76,830
242,010
828,701
67,821
419,365
2005
US$m
312,537
44,360
146,777
636,703
47,202
334,200
43
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > 2007
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Economic briefing
In the UK, GDP growth accelerated in 2007 to
3.1 per cent from 2.9 per cent in 2006, mainly as
a result of buoyant consumer and investment
spending. Net trade depressed GDP growth through
2007, and the current account deficit reached a
record 5.7 per cent of GDP in the third quarter of the
year. Employment growth was fairly subdued, rising
by approximately 0.7 per cent during the year.
Consumer Price Index (‘CPI’) inflation reached
a decade-long high of 3.1 per cent in March but
subsequently fell back to 2.1 per cent by the year-
end, close to the Bank of England’s 2 per cent target.
After a strong start to the year, nominal house prices
declined and housing activity diminished in the final
months of 2007. The Bank of England raised interest
rates by 75 basis points during 2007 to a peak of
5.75 per cent, but subsequently reduced them to
5.5 per cent at the end of 2007.
The expansion of the eurozone economy
continued steadily in 2007, with GDP growth of
2.7 per cent. As in the UK, much of the momentum
came from strength in business investment and
exports as global demand remained strong,
particularly from emerging markets. Consumption
was relatively subdued, despite declining
unemployment, although fiscal reforms (particularly
in Germany) are believed to have depressed
household expenditure. Eurozone inflation increased
steadily during the second half of the year to an
annual rate of 3.1 per cent in December, driven
largely by rises in food and energy prices. The
European Central Bank (‘ECB’) raised interest rates
by 50 basis points during 2007, to finish the year at
4 per cent.
In Turkey, economic activity softened as the
year progressed, with GDP rising by 3.9 per cent
during the first three quarters of 2007 against the
comparable period of 2006. Headline inflation
remained under pressure from increases in energy
and food prices, though core indicators improved
markedly, prompting Turkey’s central bank to
cautiously ease monetary policy. The current
account deficit stabilised at about 7 per cent of GDP
with rising service sector receipts from tourism,
although high energy costs may cause the trade
balance to deteriorate.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
US$m
Europe
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
8,289
7,108
7,675
635
586
576
8,924
7,694
8,251
Net operating income4 ....
23,072
1,797
24,869
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
(2,155)
(147)
(2,302)
Net operating income ....
20,917
1,650
22,567
Operating expenses ..........
(13,871)
(1,076)
(14,947)
Operating profit .............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax .............
7,046
(72)
6,974
574
(6)
568
7,620
(78)
7,542
416
(80)
(143)
193
–
193
(49)
144
(50)
94
(1,594)
817
3,282
7,746
8,431
11,390
2,505
27,567
(240)
(2,542)
2,265
25,025
(1,529)
(16,525)
736
223
959
8,500
95
8,595
Reported
change
%
(7)
19
48
19
(18)
20
(19)
21
232
23
Underlying
change
%
(18)
11
40
10
(10)
10
(10)
10
286
13
For footnotes, see page 130.
Review of business performance
European operations reported a pre-tax profit
of US$8.6 billion, compared with US$7.0 billion in
2006, an increase of 23 per cent. On an underlying
basis, pre-tax profits improved by 13 per cent.
In March 2007, HSBC acquired its partner’s
shares in life, property and casualty insurer, HSBC
Assurances. The results of HSBC Assurances are
excluded from the underlying commentary below.
In Commercial Banking, growth in deposit and
lending balances in the UK and ongoing business
expansion in Turkey and Malta led to steady growth
in revenues. This was partly offset by increased loan
impairment charges and higher costs associated with
44
business expansion. In Global Banking and Markets,
higher income from most businesses was offset by
trading losses in Credit and Rates and increased
costs. Strong profit growth in Private Banking
was driven by an increased client appetite for
discretionary portfolios, a rise in lending volumes
and further improvements in cross-referrals. In
Personal Financial Services, a fall in pre-tax profits
reflected ex gratia payments expensed in respect of
overdraft fees applied in previous years and a
provision for reimbursement of certain charges on
historic will trusts and other related services. The
‘Other’ segment benefited from a US$1.3 billion fair
value gain in HSBC’s own debt.
The following commentary is on an underlying
basis.
Personal Financial Services reported a pre-tax
profit of US$1.6 billion, a decrease of 31 per cent
compared with 2006. Income growth lagged cost
growth, principally as a result of ex gratia payments
expensed in respect of overdraft fees applied in
previous years which are subject to current legal
challenge.
In the UK, HSBC continued to concentrate on
enhancing services offered to customers, with the
intention of making HSBC the ‘Best Place to Bank’.
HSBC Premier was relaunched simultaneously in
35 countries, including the UK. All Personal Internet
Banking customers now have the ability to send
money in over 80 currencies to 234 countries. To
make its fees and charges more transparent, HSBC
in the UK began to show warning messages on
ATMs if the customer’s cash withdrawal would
cause a fee to be incurred.
In France, successful marketing campaigns
continued to improve brand awareness and grow
customer numbers, specifically HSBC Premier and
Student accounts. The latter benefited from the
signing of 120 partnerships with business schools.
In Turkey, the benefit of significant growth
from new customer acquisition, boosted by
successful cross-sell activities and higher balances,
more than offset increased costs incurred in
supporting business expansion.
Net interest income was broadly in line with
2006. In the UK, effective deposit pricing, coupled
with interest rate rises in the first half of 2007, led to
wider deposit spreads and higher balances. This
benefit was partly offset by lower margins on
mortgages as customers switched to fixed rate
products.
Average unsecured lending balances in the UK
declined by 5 per cent as HSBC restricted its
45
credit appetite to customers who satisfied tighter
underwriting criteria. Spreads narrowed as the
portfolio mix shifted towards these better quality,
lower-yielding loans.
Savings balances grew by 15 per cent, driven by
competitive rates and new products, such as the
Online Bonus Savers, a ‘one click’ savings product
offering real-time account opening, instantly ready
for funding. Together with improved spreads, this
contributed to a 29 per cent increase in net interest
income on savings products.
Average current account balances in the UK
increased to US$31 billion. Sales of HSBC’s
premium service, fee-based current accounts (HSBC
Premier and Plus) remained major drivers of
underlying performance, with significant year-on-
year sales growth.
UK credit card balances grew by 4 per cent in a
declining market, with growth concentrated in the
Partnership card and Marks and Spencer (‘M&S
Money’) portfolios. This benefit was more than
offset by pressure on spreads driven by a run-off in
higher-yielding accounts in the Partnership cards
business. In line with the Group’s risk-based
concentration on a narrower range of customers,
HSBC disposed of part of its non-core credit card
portfolio, principally the Marbles brand, in the last
quarter of 2007.
In light of changing market conditions,
significant investment was made in retraining the
mortgages sales force during 2007. Average
mortgage balances were broadly in line with last
year, while the portfolio mix shifted towards fixed
rate products. This, together with base rate rises,
caused spreads to tighten.
In France, customer acquisition and the
consolidation of existing relationships resulted in an
8 per cent rise in average deposit balances, higher
than the overall market increase. Average lending
balances grew by 16 per cent, mainly property-
related lending. The benefit of these increases in
volumes was more than offset by narrower spreads
due to competitive pressures and maturing of
previously higher-yielding hedging products. As a
result, net interest income fell by 11 per cent.
In Turkey, net interest income increased by
17 per cent due to strong balance sheet growth.
HSBC added over 600,000 new personal customers
during 2007, significantly exceeding its target.
Average deposit balances rose by 28 per cent,
largely driven by customer recruitment through new
branch openings and ongoing efforts to build brand
awareness. Deposit spreads remained narrow as
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > 2007
interest rates started to decline during the second half
of 2007 following rate rises earlier in the year.
Average lending balances increased by 28 per cent.
The income benefit from these increases was partly
offset by the impact of market-wide credit calming
measures which, together with increased
competition, adversely affected margins on lending
and credit cards.
Net fee income increased by 13 per cent, largely
driven by higher sales of fee-earning packaged
current accounts in the UK and credit cards in
Turkey, where HSBC recorded significant growth of
over 740,000 new cards. This was partly offset by a
US$25 million decrease in credit card default fees in
the UK as HSBC reduced its fee following the
outcome of an investigation by the OFT in April
2006. In France, fee income grew by 7 per cent
through improved transactional commissions, mainly
from increased sales of packaged accounts and
higher life insurance fees.
In the UK, pensions and life investment sales
increased as did home and motor insurance sales, the
success of the M&S Money motor insurance
campaign led to M&S Money rising to fourth in the
market for online sales. However, the insurance
results were adversely affected by lower income
from payment protection products and flood claims
in the summer.
Net trading income largely reflected the fair
value measurement of embedded options linked to
government regulated home savings products in
France. In 2006, there was a large gain; this did not
recur in 2007.
Gains on the sale of financial investments in
2007 included a share in HSBC’s sale of Marfin
Popular Bank, an investment acquired in a share
swap agreement with The Cyprus Popular Bank as
part of the sale of HSBC’s stake in the latter in 2006.
In addition, a gain arose from the merger of two
payment services providers and there were two
further gains on the share of profits from the
MasterCard Incorporated IPO, although to a lesser
extent than in 2006.
Other operating income declined significantly,
due to a fall in the present value of in-force (‘PVIF’)
long-term insurance business, following a change in
FSA regulations which permitted certain rules
relating to the calculation of actuarial liabilities for
the long-term insurance business to be relaxed. This
was offset by a corresponding reduction in
provisions reported in ‘Net insurance claims and
movements in liabilities to policyholders’. HSBC
recorded a loss on the disposal of the Marbles brand
cards portfolio, offset by the sale of other card
46
portfolios at a profit. In 2006, HSBC benefited from
a share of the gain on the sale of its stake in The
Cyprus Popular Bank.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions of US$2.0 billion were 4 per cent higher
than in 2006. In the UK consumer finance business,
refinements to the methodology used to calculate
roll-rate percentages resulted in a higher charge in
the first half of the year. Excluding this, loan
impairment charges were marginally lower than in
2006. Loan impairment charges in the second half of
2007 were lower than in the first half of the year, as
overall credit quality improved following measures
taken in the recent past to tighten underwriting
standards and improve the credit quality of new
business. Although losses from mortgage lending
remained low, maximum loan to value ratios were
reduced during the year to mitigate the effects of a
possible housing market downturn. In France, loan
impairment charges remained low, albeit higher than
in 2006, as credit quality remained good. In Turkey,
credit quality remained stable and growth in loan
impairment charges followed increases in lending
balances.
Operating expenses were 11 per cent higher than
in 2006. In the UK, US$227 million arose from ex
gratia payments expensed in respect of overdraft
fees applied in previous years, and a further
US$169 million was provided for reimbursement
of certain charges on historic will trusts and other
related services.
HSBC concentrated discretionary investment
on technology that promotes straight-through
processing, allowing customers to purchase products
online. This will improve processing time and reduce
errors caused by human intervention. As part of the
ongoing branch refurbishment programme, a further
52 branches were refurbished during 2007.
In France, operating expenses rose as HSBC
made further investments to take advantage of Group
synergies. In October 2007, IT systems were
successfully migrated onto HSBC’s core banking
platform. This will enable HSBC France to integrate
its branded operations and benefit from the Group’s
expertise in technology, process and products. In
Turkey, ongoing investment in capacity and
infrastructure to support business growth, as
evidenced by the opening of 45 branches during
2007, contributed to a 17 per cent increase in
operating expenses.
Commercial Banking reported a pre-tax profit
of US$2.5 billion, an increase of 4 per cent.
Revenues rose by 12 per cent as a result of both
balance sheet growth and an increase in fee-based
product income, driven by customer recruitment and
the expansion of the small and mid-market segments
in Turkey and Malta. These benefits were partly
offset by higher loan impairment charges, principally
on corporate relationship managed accounts in the
UK and increased operating expenses from ongoing
business expansion throughout the region.
HSBC continued to expand the scope of its
services in European emerging markets with the
recruitment of a further 36 relationship managers.
HSBCnet was launched in Armenia, Kazakhstan,
Malta, Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia
during the year. Significant income growth was
recorded in Armenia and Poland, countries which
offer potential for high GDP growth going forward
and demand for conventional trade services.
In support of HSBC’s strategy to be the
leading international commercial bank, dedicated
international corporate teams were established in
London and Paris to drive and support cross-border
business. Global Links and International Business
Centres are now available in 11 European countries,
simplifying cross-border account opening for
customers and more than tripling successful outward
referrals over 2006.
Net interest income increased by 7 per cent in
2007, largely from growth in the UK, Turkey,
Germany and Malta. In the UK, a 10 per cent growth
in deposit balances was primarily driven by a
successful negotiated-rate deposit product launched
in 2005. This helped fund lending growth of 14 per
cent, which was largely the result of strong growth in
corporate and structured banking and customer
numbers in commercial centres. These income
benefits were partly offset by narrower margins on
loans and overdrafts as a result of increasingly
competitive market conditions.
In France, HSBC continued to increase its client
base, reflecting the ongoing success of initiatives to
raise its brand profile and improve customer
segmentation. HSBC reinforced its position as the
leading international bank and increased the
recruitment of new customers, particularly small
businesses with high potential. Average lending
balances increased by 19 per cent and average
deposit balances, boosted by the financial markets
crisis in the second half of the year, increased by
22 per cent. The income benefit of this balance sheet
growth was more than offset by competitive
pressures on margins and the maturity of previously
higher-yielding hedging products. As a result, net
interest income was slightly lower than 2006.
Net interest income in Turkey increased by
46 per cent, as HSBC continued to develop its
47
service offerings for its micro, small and mid-market
business customers. Income benefited from growth
of 108 per cent in small and micro customer lending
together with a 114 basis point increase in spreads.
This upward trend in lending spreads was driven by
new product bundles and growth in Commercial
Banking’s profitable overdraft account. Average
deposit balances rose by 4 per cent in Turkey, in part
due to an increase in cash management clients, with
wider margins further benefiting income.
Net fee income increased by 18 per cent.
Excluding Commercial Banking’s share of Insurance
Brokers’ fees previously reported in the ‘Other’
segment, net fee income rose by 5 per cent. In the
UK, a modest increase in net fee income was driven
by growth in foreign exchange fees and card activity
following the small-business credit card product
successfully launched in May 2006. In Turkey, net
fee income grew by 42 per cent, driven by
investment banking, advisory and structured finance
transactions, mainly due to a 15 per cent increase in
corporate clients. Trade products also drove fee
income and referrals from other HSBC Group
offices which further contributed to the increase. In
France, net fee income grew by 9 per cent, as
customer acquisition and the consolidation of
existing relationships led to a 9 per cent increase in
transaction fees.
Gains on the sale of financial investments in
2007 reflected Commercial Banking’s share of
HSBC’s sale of Marfin Popular Bank, an investment
acquired in a share swap agreement with The Cyprus
Popular Bank Limited (‘Cyprus Popular Bank’), as
part of the sale of HSBC’s stake in the latter in 2006.
2007 benefited from further gains on the share of
profits from the MasterCard Incorporated IPO, to a
similar extent as in 2006.
Other operating income declined significantly,
due to a fall in the PVIF long-term insurance
business, following a change in FSA regulations.
This was offset by a corresponding reduction in
provisions reported in ‘Net insurance claims and
movements in liabilities to policyholders’. The non-
recurrence of Commercial Banking’s US$38 million
share of the gain on the sale of HSBC’s stake in
Cyprus Popular Bank also contributed to the fall in
other operating income.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions remained low despite a 23 per cent rise on
levels recorded in 2006. In the UK, loan impairment
charges increased; this was concentrated in four
large corporate accounts. In France, credit quality
remained good and loan impairment charges stayed
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > 2007 / 2006
low despite balance sheet growth. In Turkey,
increased charges reflected growth in lending
volumes as general credit quality remained
satisfactory.
Excluding Insurance Brokers, operating
expenses increased by 7 per cent. Across Europe,
costs were higher as a result of sales staff
recruitment and other costs to support business
development and expansion, particularly in Turkey
and Eastern Europe. In addition, France incurred
incremental restructuring costs relating to the
migration of IT systems onto HSBC’s core banking
platform.
Global Banking and Markets in Europe
reported a pre-tax profit of US$2.5 billion, broadly
in line with 2006 despite write-downs in credit,
structured credit derivatives and certain positions in
leveraged and acquisition finance, resulting from the
challenging credit market in the second half of 2007.
Apart from these product lines, the Global Markets
and Global Banking businesses reported robust
growth complemented by significant gains on
principal investments. The cost efficiency ratio
deteriorated by 3 percentage points.
Total operating income increased by 7 per cent
to US$7.6 billion. Strong foreign exchange and
equities trading income drove revenue growth,
enhanced by higher advisory fees and fair value
gains in financing and capital markets. Securities
services benefited from higher transaction volumes
driven by increased market volatility. A rise in
revenues from payments and cash management and
principal investments further boosted income. This
growth was partly offset by significant write-downs
in credit and structured derivatives.
In the UK, payments and cash management
income grew due to higher customer balances, which
rose as the liquidity crisis led customers to increase
their cash balances. In Turkey, higher balance sheet
management revenues contributed US$12 million.
Net fee income was 28 per cent higher, with
robust growth in income from financing businesses
in line with greater market activity in the UK and
France in the first half of 2007. In securities services,
a rise in volumes and new client mandates drove the
increase in revenues. Assets under custody grew by
16 per cent.
Overall, income from trading activities fell due
to US$713 million of write-downs reported in credit,
structured credit derivatives and leveraged and
acquisition finance in the UK. These were partly
offset by strong growth in foreign exchange driven
by market volatility and a weakening US dollar. In
48
equities, strong trading income from core products
was supplemented by a gain from the sale of
Euronext shares. In France, the continuing trend of
higher income from structured derivatives reflected
the benefit of investment to enhance capabilities.
The credit market dislocation also led to an adverse
fair value adjustment in respect of loan commitments
outstanding when global credit spreads widened in
the second half of 2007.
The UK principal investments business
benefited a small number of significant realisations
during the year. Gains less losses from financial
investments rose to US$1.1 billion.
A net recovery on loan impairment charges,
albeit lower than in 2006, reflected the continued
low level of corporate credit defaults.
Operating expenses rose by 12 per cent to
US$5.2 billion. Operational costs rose in Global
Markets, particularly in structured derivatives where
the French businesses invested to support local
revenue growth. Costs also rose in payments and
cash management and securities services, driven by
the rise in business volumes. Additional staff costs
resulted from recruitment in selected businesses
during 2006.
HSBC’s share of profits from associates
recovered due to the non-recurrence of an
impairment charge on a private equity investment
held by an associate in 2006.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit of
US$915 million, an increase of 11 per cent. A strong
performance in Switzerland was driven by the
promotion of advisory and discretionary mandates,
with existing clients further leveraging their
portfolios. Profits in the UK declined as a result of
lower gains from the partial disposal of the
Hermitage Fund. Excluding this transaction, UK
revenue increased strongly. The cost-efficiency ratio
increased slightly by 0.9 percentage points to
56.9 per cent, affected by lower investment gains in
2007. Despite this, the cost efficiency ratio is one of
the strongest in the industry.
Net interest income rose by 14 per cent to
US$793 million. Switzerland contributed the
majority of the increase. Loans and advances
to customers increased by 31 per cent to
US$13.8 billion, as existing clients further leveraged
their portfolios to take advantage of alternative
investment opportunities. Monaco and Germany
also contributed to the rise in net interest income.
In Germany, net interest income increased by 14 per
cent due to a large growth in deposits. Similarly, in
Monaco, customer accounts rose, augmented by
higher lending balances as existing clients increased
their leverage.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net fee income increased by 15 per cent to
US$1.0 billion, mainly due to a 10 per cent increase
in funds under management in Switzerland with
discretionary and advisory funds generating higher
annual fees. Client investments in structured
products and brokerage fees also contributed to the
rise in fee income. In the UK, fees increased by
10 per cent, driven by a rise in wealth and loan fees.
Trading income was 63 per cent higher at
US$170 million, mainly driven by foreign exchange
trading by clients in Switzerland.
Gains from financial investments decreased by
23 per cent to US$115 million. This primarily related
to a gain from a partial disposal of a seed capital
investment in the Hermitage Fund which was lower
than that recognised from an earlier disposal in 2006.
Client assets, which include deposits and funds
under management, grew by 19 per cent to
US$258.4 billion. The large growth in client assets
was driven by positive market performance and
US$20.2 billion of net new money, with Switzerland
contributing US$7.1 billion and the UK and Monaco
contributing US$3.7 billion and US$3.6 billion each.
The growth in cross-referrals continued, with inward
referrals from other customer groups contributing
US$3.9 billion to total client assets.
Operating expenses were 15 per cent higher than
in 2006, driven by business expansion. More
front-office staff, higher performance-related
bonuses, IT and marketing costs all contributed to
the rise. The overall increase in operating expenses
was partially offset by the effect of a change in
pension arrangements.
Within Other, fair value movements in HSBC’s
own debt and related derivatives resulted in gains of
US$1.3 billion, largely as a consequence of
movements in credit spreads. These movements will
reverse through the income statement over the life of
the debt unless the debt is repaid before its
contractual maturity. This segment also benefited
from a US$73 million adjustment to the embedded
value of HSBC’s associate, HSBC Assurances, prior
to the acquisition of its remaining capital, from
which date it was accounted for as a subsidiary.
Economic briefing
UK GDP growth increased in 2006 to 2.9 per cent
from 1.8 per cent in 2005. This followed a recovery
in both household and company spending. CPI
inflation increased through the year from 1.9 per
cent in January to 3 per cent in December, following
large increases in the price of petrol and gas. The
Bank of England raised interest rates from 4.5 per
cent to 5 per cent, citing concerns about spare
capacity, rapid money growth and the possibility of
inflation staying above target for some time. House
price inflation remained strong but consumer
spending appeared unaffected. Secured lending
continued to increase although unsecured lending
plateaued. There was evidence that a number of
households were struggling with the burden of debt
as personal insolvencies and repossessions increased.
Employment rose, although by less than the increase
in available workers as migrant inflows remained
strong and the participation rate of UK residents in
the labour force increased. As a result, the
unemployment rate increased, contributing to
constrained wage growth throughout the year despite
relatively high rates of headline inflation.
The recovery in the eurozone economy gathered
momentum through the course of 2006. GDP rose by
approximately 2.7 per cent, the fastest rate since
2000. Much of the improvement reflected increases
in exports and investment, as global demand
remained strong and corporate activity and profits
rose. Consumer spending remained subdued, despite
a gradual rise in employment. German growth
improved sharply, while growth in France and Italy
was less impressive. Eurozone inflation was heavily
affected by rises in energy and food prices. Inflation,
excluding energy and food, remained contained at
just 1.7 per cent. The ECB increased the key policy
interest rate from 2.25 per cent at the beginning of
2006 to 3.5 per cent in December. The ECB
continued to describe monetary policy as
‘accommodative’, thereby effectively ending the
year with a bias towards tightening.
Turkey’s economy slowed markedly in the
third quarter, with year-on-year GDP growth of
3.4 per cent, down from 7.8 per cent in the second
quarter. The current account deficit continued to
widen, reaching 8 per cent of GDP in December,
partly from high-energy prices but also from the
increasing substitution of imported materials for
local ones due to the overvalued currency. More than
half of the deficit was financed by healthy foreign
direct investment inflows. The International
49
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > 2006
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
Europe
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
8,221
6,299
6,284
Net operating income4 .....
20,804
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ......
(1,929)
18,875
7
82
189
278
(25)
253
8,228
6,381
6,473
21,082
(1,954)
19,128
Operating expenses ..........
(12,639)
(131)
(12,770)
Operating profit ...............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax ...............
6,236
120
6,356
122
6
128
6,358
126
6,484
For footnotes, see page 130.
–
–
(11)
(11)
–
(11)
–
(11)
(19)
(30)
2006
as
reported
US$m
8,289
7,108
7,675
23,072
61
727
1,213
2,001
(201)
(2,155)
1,800
20,917
(1,101)
(13,871)
699
(179)
520
7,046
(72)
6,974
Reported
change
%
1
13
22
11
(12)
11
(10)
13
(160)
10
Underlying
change
%
1
11
19
9
(10)
9
(9)
11
(142)
8
Monetary Fund’s programme for Turkey remained
on track.
Review of business performance
European operations reported a pre-tax profit
of US$7.0 billion compared with US$6.4 billion in
2005, an increase of 10 per cent. On an underlying
basis, pre-tax profits grew by 8 per cent. Underlying
net operating income increased by 8 per cent, in line
with operating expenses. Commercial Banking
delivered a third successive year of growth, driven
by strong balance sheet growth in the UK and
organic expansion in Turkey. Record profits in
Private Banking were driven by strong client asset
inflows, a more sophisticated product mix and
lending growth. Global Banking and Markets made
encouraging gains in trading activities, and operating
expenses rose in line with net operating income. In
Personal Financial Services, net operating income
growth slowed as HSBC tightened its underwriting
criteria on unsecured credit. An emphasis on deposit,
wealth and insurance products contributed to an
increase in costs, which were driven by
infrastructure investment both in the physical
environment and direct channels.
The following commentary is on an underlying
basis.
Personal Financial Services reported a pre-tax
profit of US$1.9 billion, 2 per cent lower than in
2005. Net operating income rose by 4 per cent and
loan impairment charges increased by slightly more
than revenues as increasing numbers of debtors
sought formal protection from their obligations.
Costs grew by 7 per cent, reflecting investment in
infrastructure throughout the region, and the cost
efficiency ratio rose by 1.2 percentage points to
59.2 per cent.
In the UK, HSBC responded to concerns over
high levels of consumer indebtedness and the growth
in personal bankruptcies and individual voluntary
arrangements (‘IVAs’) by adopting more selective
underwriting criteria and reducing credit origination.
Revenues from credit-related insurance declined as a
consequence. In response, HSBC increased its focus
on non credit-related income streams, particularly
savings and high-value current accounts. Strong
balance growth in these products was achieved
through marketing initiatives, competitive pricing
and the success of innovative propositions such as
the packaged ‘Plus’ and ‘Passport’ current accounts,
the latter supported by the implementation during the
year of a more refined approach to customer
segmentation.
Considerable strategic attention was given to
enhancing product distribution and channel
management. The branch refurbishment programme
continued and improvements were made to direct
banking, notably the introduction of self-service
machines and the upgrading of cash machine service
offerings. HSBC’s internet offering was also
enhanced to offer personalised content and sales
capabilities, with improved customer accessibility.
In France, a marked improvement in brand
awareness after the 2005 rebranding to ‘HSBC
France’, supported by competitive pricing, aided the
recruitment of target customers and consequential
50
balance sheet growth, most notably in residential
property lending. Despite this growth, there was a
decline in profit before tax, due to competitive
pressures on margin and the time lag between
incurring costs on customer acquisition and earning
incremental revenue from future opportunities to
cross-sell.
In Turkey profit before tax declined by 2 per
cent, as revenue growth was offset by investment
costs. Organic development was furthered by the
opening of 37 new branches during the year,
bringing the total to 193, and a number of marketing
initiatives to build brand awareness. Balance sheet
and revenue growth accelerated as a result, as did
customer recruitment. Overall customer numbers
stood at 2.3 million at the end of 2006.
Net interest income increased by 5 per cent to
US$5.7 billion, substantially from balance sheet
growth throughout the region.
In the UK, net interest income was driven by
growth in savings, deposit and current accounts, with
higher balances achieved through targeted sales and
marketing efforts. Interest income from credit cards
and mortgages also increased.
A focus on liabilities helped boost new UK
savings account volumes markedly in a buoyant yet
highly competitive savings market. HSBC’s
competitive internet-based products were the key
driver of growth. Cash invested in First Direct’s
‘e-savings’ product trebled; balances in HSBC’s
‘Online Saver’ increased sixfold. Overall, average
savings balances, excluding money market
investments, increased by 28 per cent and net
interest income rose by 25 per cent.
Current account balances in the UK increased
by 6 per cent to US$26.0 billion. Within this, the
proportion of value-added packaged current accounts
attracting fees rose significantly. The number of
HSBC’s fee-based accounts more than doubled
during 2006. In aggregate, packaged current account
balances increased by 25 per cent and represented
nearly half of the overall increase in current
accounts. Spreads remained broadly in line with
2005.
Average UK credit card balances rose by 5 per
cent, to US$13.7 billion, driven by promotional
campaigns and marketing. Growth was strongest in
M&S branded cards, which represented 4 percentage
points of the increase, driven by an increased sales
focus which included extensive media advertising.
This was partly offset by declining balances within
the store cards business and the cards business of
HFC Bank Ltd (‘HFC’), reflecting HSBC’s more
51
restricted credit appetite. Spreads increased modestly
compared with 2005.
Average UK mortgage balances rose by
11 per cent to US$68.9 billion, primarily in fixed
rate mortgages. Growth was achieved through
competitive pricing and targeted marketing
strategies, including the launch of new fixed,
discount and tracker-rate mortgages during the year.
A slight narrowing of spreads reflected a change in
mix away from variable rate mortgages to fixed rate
mortgages, and the competitive positioning referred
to above.
Average unsecured lending balances in the UK
declined by 4 per cent, reflecting HSBC’s decision
to contain growth through stricter underwriting
criteria. Spreads narrowed, following the
introduction in 2005 of preferential pricing for
lower-risk customers, and a change in mix towards
higher-value but lower-yielding loans.
In France, net interest income fell by 8 per cent.
Spreads narrowed as older higher-yielding
investments matured, while competitive pricing
reduced lending yields, particularly in the residential
mortgage market. These pressures on margin were
only partially offset by strong balance sheet growth.
Marketing campaigns building on the ‘HSBC
France’ brand aided strong sales and customer
recruitment, most notably in residential property
lending and current accounts and also increased
future cross-selling opportunities.
In Turkey, net interest income rose by 14 per
cent. Lending grew strongly, substantially funded by
deposit growth. Overall, deposit balances rose by
over 50 per cent, largely driven by customer
recruitment aided by the branch network expansion
referred to above. Spreads widened following
increases in overnight interest rates and the value of
funds rose as a consequence. Marketing initiatives
and cross-sales with credit card customers helped
more than double average unsecured lending
balances. Mortgage lending was also strong, with a
60 per cent increase in balances. Credit card
balances rose by 22 per cent, with growth dampened
by credit calming measures imposed by government
regulation.
Net fee income increased by 8 per cent to
US$2.5 billion. In the UK, rising sales of fee-earning
packaged current accounts, travel money and
investment products drove fee growth. Fees from
unsecured lending also rose. These benefits were
partly offset by lower creditor protection income,
reflecting the steps taken by HSBC to constrain
lending growth. Reduced loan sales and smaller
average loans (the result of this initiative) led to both
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > 2006
lower insurance sales and a reduction in average
premiums.
In France, banking fees rose through higher
sales of packaged current accounts. Transactional
and overdraft fees and insurance distribution fees
also increased, reflecting growth in the customer
base. In Turkey, strong growth in lending volumes
and, to a lesser extent, credit cards, helped drive fee
income growth. Additional sales staff were recruited
to reinforce the emphasis on wealth management,
and the launch of new pension products also helped
boost fees.
In 2006, MasterCard became publicly listed
through an IPO, and the US$37 million gain from
financial investments mainly reflected Personal
Financial Services’ share of the proceeds of the IPO.
Responding to changes in work and shopping
patterns among its customers and the increasing
acceptance of direct channels, HSBC appraised its
UK property portfolio during the year. Higher other
operating income reflected Personal Financial
Services’ share of revenue from branch sale and
lease-back transactions. Personal Financial Services’
US$37 million share income on the sale of HSBC’s
stake in Cyprus Popular Bank was also included
within other operating income.
Lower sales of life and creditor repayment
protection, which were driven by the constraints on
personal lending growth referred to above, and a
change in reinsurance arrangements at the end of
2005, contributed to the decrease in net earned
insurance premiums. Lower sales of investment-
linked insurance products, together with the effect of
market movements on related insurance and
investment assets, contributed to the decline in net
income from financial instruments designated at fair
value. This was largely offset by a corresponding
decrease in net insurance claims and movements in
policyholders’ liabilities.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions of US$1.8 billion were 6 per cent higher
than in 2005, largely reflecting lending growth in the
region.
In the UK, the 8 per cent rise in loan impairment
charges was broadly in line with lending growth.
Actions taken on underwriting and collection
activities mitigated a continuation of the rising trend
in personal bankruptcies and IVAs seen since the
legislative change in 2004. In 2006, IVAs became
the main driver of loan impairment growth across the
industry as the availability and marketing of third-
party debt reduction services increased.
52
Within the UK, loan impairment was most
pronounced in consumer finance unsecured
portfolios, in which delinquency also rose as the
effect of interest rate increases on relatively high
levels of indebtedness put pressure on household
cash flows. In HSBC’s other portfolios, action
undertaken by HSBC during 2005 and early 2006,
predominantly tightening underwriting criteria and
collections procedures, proved successful in
improving credit quality indicators on more recently
written debt. In the second half of 2006, HSBC
strengthened the measures available to manage
insolvencies and impaired debt including, inter alia,
the further development of predictive modelling to
enhance underwriting decisions.
In France, credit quality was sound
notwithstanding strong growth in customer
advances, and the loan impairment charge remained
low. In Turkey, overall credit quality was also
sound, and delinquency on credit cards improved
following enhanced collections efforts and changes
in government regulation. This was reflected in a
36 per cent reduction in loan impairment charges.
Operating expenses increased by 7 per cent.
A US$57 million write-down of intangibles was
attributed to card portfolios acquired in the UK
which were written off in the light of the higher
impairment charges being experienced. Excluding
this item, the increase was 6 per cent, primarily
reflecting investment in upgrading and expanding
capacity and infrastructure across the region.
In the UK, 104 branches were refurbished
during 2006. Responding to changing customer
preferences and upgrading its customer service,
HSBC extended its opening hours in certain
branches, necessitating the recruitment of additional
counter staff, and increased its IT investment in self-
service machines and other direct banking channels,
in the process improving cost efficiency.
In France, there was a 4 per cent rise in
operating expenses, driven by the recruitment of
additional sales staff, higher marketing expenditure
to attract new customers, and the migration to a
common IT infrastructure. In Turkey, the opening of
37 new branches and associated growth in numbers
of sales staff and infrastructure costs drove a 26 per
cent rise in costs. Marketing expenditure also
increased in support of the growing consumer
lending, insurance and pensions businesses.
Commercial Banking reported a pre-tax profit
of US$2.2 billion, an increase of 14 per cent
compared with 2005. Adjusting for the sale of the
UK fleet management and vehicle finance leasing
business, which was sold in the autumn of 2005,
profit before tax grew by 17 per cent, driven by
growth of 10 per cent in net operating income
compared with just 4 per cent in costs. Revenues
increased by 9 per cent through balance sheet
growth, customer recruitment and improved
cross-sales in the UK, and expansion of the middle
market, small and micro-businesses in Turkey. The
4 per cent growth in operating expenses primarily
reflected investment to support business expansion
throughout the region. Credit quality was stable.
In the UK, HSBC invested to expand sales
capacity and improve service through recruitment
and the opening of commercial centres. To support
HSBC’s strategic intention to lead the market in
international commercial banking, a dedicated
International Banking Centre was created which, as
part of a global network, simplified cross-border
account opening. HSBC also simplified and
launched new foreign currency accounts. Significant
progress was made in enhancing the functionality of
HSBC’s award-winning internet banking, including
the implementation of the UK’s first same-day high-
value payments offering and the launch of HSBC’s
first commercial direct banking proposition,
Business Direct, which attracted over 19,000 small
and micro business accounts during the year.
In France, HSBC increased customer
recruitment by approximately one third by
concentrating on improving brand awareness among
commercial businesses. HSBC became the principal
banker for the majority of new customers recruited.
In Turkey, the establishment of eight centres, the
recruitment of additional relationship management
staff and a focus on maintaining high service levels
contributed to a 40 per cent increase in the number
of active customers as HSBC successfully sustained
its efforts to grow its share of middle market, small
and micro-business banking.
Net interest income increased by 8 per cent,
largely driven by increases in the UK and Turkey. In
France, the benefit of strong balance sheet growth
was more than offset by competitive pressure on
margins.
HSBC slowed the rate of growth in lending in
the UK during 2006 by refining underwriting criteria
and emphasising non-lending related revenue
streams and, consequently, average lending balances
rose by 8 per cent during the year and spreads
remained broadly flat. Increased priority was given
to raising deposits through transactional and savings
accounts and, as a result, deposit balances rose by
37 per cent and current account balances by 8 per
cent. The benefit of this volume growth was partly
offset by spread compression on sterling-
53
denominated accounts as customers were offered
more attractive pricing.
HSBC boosted the recruitment of small and
micro business customers in the UK by holding
commercial theme weeks and increasing client
contact by embedding business specialists in selected
branches. These initiatives delivered increases in the
number of start-up accounts and the number of
customers who switched their business from other
banks to HSBC. Higher-value international and
foreign currency accounts rose as a consequence.
Net interest income in France was broadly in
line with 2005 as the benefit of strong balance sheet
growth, driven by the acquisition of new customers
and improved levels of customer retention, was
offset by narrowing spreads from competitive market
pressures and lower earnings from free funds.
Net interest income in Turkey increased by
41 per cent, driven by a doubling in lending
balances. HSBC extended its geographic coverage
through expansion of the branch network, including
the launch of eight new centres dedicated to smaller
commercial customers, and these boosted customer
recruitment. The introduction of pre-approved credit
limits for existing customers also contributed to
lending growth, and the focus on attracting liability
products helped more than double deposit balances.
Net fee income increased by 4 per cent to
US$1.7 billion. Current account and money
transmission fees rose as a result of customer
recruitment and higher transaction volumes in most
countries. In the UK, client workshops and other
promotional activities were deployed to support
increased sales of treasury products, boosting
treasury revenue as foreign exchange volumes grew.
In France a 2 per cent increase in income was largely
in transactional current account fees, reflecting
growth in the customer base.
Other operating income was 41 per cent lower
than in 2005 and reflected lower asset finance
revenues following the sale of the UK fleet
management business referred to above. This was
partly offset by the inclusion of Commercial
Banking’s share of the gain on the sale of
HSBC’s stake in Cyprus Popular Bank
(US$38 million), and the income from UK branch
sale and lease-back transactions.
Credit quality in Commercial Banking was
stable in most countries. In the UK, loan impairment
charges and other credit risk provisions fell by
16 per cent, largely due to the non-recurrence of an
individual loan impairment allowance against a
single customer in 2005. Excluding this, there was a
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > 2006
modest decline in UK impairment charges, as the
effect of lending growth was more than offset by
improved credit quality, particularly in relation to
HSBC’s larger exposures. In France, loan
impairment charges, while remaining low, returned
to a more normal level after relatively high
recoveries in 2005. In Turkey, higher loan
impairment charges reflected growth in lending.
Operating expenses decreased by 1 per cent.
Excluding the sale of the UK fleet management
activities referred to above, costs were 4 per cent
higher than in 2005, reflecting investment to drive
business growth throughout the region. As a result of
revenues growing significantly faster than costs,
there was a 3.1 percentage point improvement in the
cost efficiency ratio. In the UK, increased costs
reflected the recruitment of additional sales staff and
higher IT expenditure. Costs in France fell by 2 per
cent compared with 2005 as savings from cost
control offset increases from the recruitment of
additional sales staff and expenses associated with
the migration to common IT platforms. In Turkey,
recruitment and marketing costs incurred in support
of the growing small and micro businesses drove a
38 per cent rise in expenses.
Global Banking and Markets reported a pre-
tax profit of US$2.3 billion, an increase of 5 per
cent, compared with 2005. A reduction in recoveries
of loan impairment charges and lower private equity
gains masked strong growth in core operating
activities. Global Markets’ revenues were 36 per
cent higher than in 2005 as robust performances in
the global capital markets and securities services
businesses were complemented by strong trading
gains. The cost efficiency ratio improved modestly
compared with 2005.
Total operating income was US$6.6 billion,
17 per cent higher than in 2005. This was despite the
fact that in the UK, France and Turkey, balance
sheet management revenues continued to fall,
resulting in an overall decline of 56 per cent. This
shortfall was partly offset by higher net interest
income in securities services as customer volumes
grew in higher-value products such as securities
lending and foreign exchange. The lending business
delivered a 13 per cent increase in corporate
balances and corporate spreads remained broadly in
line with 2005.
Net interest income in the payments and cash
management business rose as deposit balances
increased by 18 per cent. Surplus liquidity in the
market fed higher business volumes. Increased
transaction volumes resulting from new client
54
acquisitions and recent expansion initiatives also
contributed to higher revenues.
Net fee income rose by 23 per cent, reflecting a
63 per cent fee increase in the global capital markets
business and fees more than doubling in the
securities services business. The financing and
advisory businesses benefited from a higher number
of deals mandated and a broader product range.
Assets under custody grew by 22 per cent with
notable increases in alternative fund assets,
particularly from Ireland and Luxembourg.
In HSBC Global Asset Management, revenues
increased significantly, boosted by a 4 per cent
increase in funds under management and higher
performance fees allied to revenues from disposals
of property and structured finance fund investments.
Trading income increased with positive revenue
trends in the key product areas where HSBC has
invested, notably Credit and Rates, foreign exchange
and structured derivatives. Revenues increased
substantially, particularly in the area of interest rate
derivatives, which benefited from opportunities
created by a relatively volatile market. Additional
gains were reported in emerging market bonds due to
higher volumes, as investors adjusted their risk
appetite and responded to a general improvement in
market sentiment towards developing economies.
Higher foreign exchange revenue was driven by
greater customer volumes and increased trading
opportunities offered by a combination of US dollar
volatility and more uncertain economic conditions in
emerging markets. Structured derivatives income
increased by 88 per cent as HSBC leveraged its
investment in this business to meet the needs of its
institutional clients.
Gains from sales of financial investments, at
US$413 million, were in line with 2005. Notable
among the investments realised in the year were the
sales of specialist property and structured finance
fund investments by HSBC Global Asset
Management.
Other income declined by 26 per cent as one-off
gains from restructuring and syndication of assets in
Global Investment Banking were not repeated.
The overall credit environment remained
favourable with market liquidity supporting debt
reconstruction as credit spreads tightened. As a
result, HSBC achieved net recoveries for the third
year in succession, albeit at a lower level than in
2005, when HSBC benefited from a release of
collective impairment allowances in the second half.
Operating expenses were 14 per cent higher at
US$4.2 billion, largely supporting volume growth
in various businesses and performance-related
compensation in Global Markets, where revenues
increased by 36 per cent. Costs in 2006 also reflected
the full-year effect of the investment made
throughout 2005 as well as ongoing investment in
product development, particularly in structured
derivatives and Credit and Rates. In HSBC Global
Asset Management, a robust performance resulted in
higher staff and support costs.
A rise in operational expenditure was driven by
increased volumes as well as new business won in
respect of payments and cash management funds
administration, securities services and Group
Investment Businesses.
The decline in HSBC’s share of profits in
associates and joint ventures reflected a loss arising
from an impairment charge on a private equity
investment within an associate. This was
compounded by the non-recurrence of one-off gains
realised in 2005, a significant proportion of which
were recognised in the second half of the year.
Private Banking delivered a record pre-tax
profit of US$805 million in Europe, an increase of
48 per cent compared with 2005. The cost efficiency
ratio improved by 6.7 percentage points to 55.7 per
cent. There was a US$108 million gain on the partial
sale of an investment in the Hermitage Fund and,
excluding this, pre-tax profit increased by 28 per
cent. This result was achieved through growth in
client assets, increased lending and transaction
volumes and distribution of a broader and more
sophisticated product range. Growth in intra-Group
referrals with other customer groups was
encouraging and also contributed to increased
revenues.
Net interest income was 23 per cent higher at
US$675 million, driven by balance sheet growth,
primarily in the UK and Switzerland. Lending
balances were 24 per cent higher and were funded by
increased deposits. In the UK, the 31 per cent
expansion of the lending book resulted primarily
from growth in mortgage balances driven by a
market which remained buoyant at the upper end. In
Switzerland, an 18 per cent rise in lending largely
reflected client appetite for leverage to facilitate
equity and alternative investment opportunities.
Fee income increased by 19 per cent to
US$869 million. This growth resulted from
increased funds under management and a favourable
mix change towards higher fee-generating
discretionary and advisory managed funds, including
the continued success of the Structured Investment
Solutions (‘SIS’) and Core Investment Solutions
(‘CIS’) products and the launch of the Actively
55
Managed Portfolio product. A significant
performance fee came from the Hermitage Fund, a
public equity fund dedicated to Russia, which was
US$23 million greater than in 2005. The expansion
of HSBC’s residential property advisory business,
which opened new offices in the UK and France,
also contributed to fee income growth.
Gains from financial investments in both 2005
and 2006 arose mainly from the sale of debt and
investment holdings. Gains in 2006 included
US$108 million from the partial disposal of HSBC’s
investment in the Hermitage Fund.
Excluding gains from financial investments,
trading and other operating income was marginally
lower than in 2005.
Client assets, including deposits, rose by 18 per
cent to US$218 billion. Net new money was
US$19 billion, with the largest inflows arising in
Switzerland and the UK. In Switzerland, improved
brand awareness, successful product placement and
cross-referrals with other customer groups, all
contributed to significant net new money of
US$11 billion. In the UK, net new money of
US$3 billion was garnered from referrals from
Commercial Banking and the retail network, new
regional offices and continued growth in the
underlying business. Net new money in Monaco and
Germany exceeded US$1 billion and US$2 billion,
respectively, also contributing to the growth in client
assets. The value of clients’ investments in HSBC’s
discretionary managed suite of SIS and CIS products
grew very strongly, reaching US$1.7 billion.
Operating expenses were 13 per cent higher
than in 2005 due to higher performance-related
remuneration, recruitment of client-facing
professionals across the region to support the
growth of the business, and continued investment
in the recently opened UK regional offices. The
combination of HSBC’s principal trust businesses in
Switzerland also added to costs in 2006 but is
expected to bring efficiency gains in subsequent
years. Overall increased expenses were more than
offset by greater revenue generation which
contributed to the 6.7 per cent improvement in the
cost efficiency ratio.
In Other, increases in US interest rates led to
higher earnings on capital, which were partly offset
by increased subordinated debt-servicing costs.
Movements in the fair value of own debt and
associated hedges were US$33 million, compared
with an adverse movement of US$15 million in
2005, principally from movements in HSBC’s
own credit spread. The fair value of own debt
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > Profit /(loss) before tax by customer group
incorporates an element attributable to the credit
spread on HSBC’s debt instruments. As HSBC’s
credit spreads narrow, accounting losses are
reported, and the reverse is true in the event of
spreads widening. These valuation adjustments do
not alter the cash flows envisaged as part of the
documented interest rate management strategy.
Operating expenses decreased by 5 per cent,
driven by the non-recurrence of litigation expenses
in France.
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business
Europe
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income/
(expense) ................................
Total operating income ............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ..............
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income ...............
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
6,604
3,060
Commercial
Banking
US$m
3,419
2,194
60
(7)
53
126
50
1
3,511
54
13,459
(3,214)
10,245
(2,044)
8,201
36
30
66
31
36
4
521
(35)
6,236
(265)
5,971
(515)
5,456
Total operating expenses ............
(6,635)
(2,941)
Operating profit ........................
1,566
2,515
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
15
1
4
Profit before tax ........................
1,581
2,516
2,527
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ....................
%
6.5
64.8
%
10.4
49.3
%
10.4
67.3
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
86
(4,517)
1,361
2,316
2,657
(610)
2,047
(185)
1,100
155
–
853
7,647
–
793
1,032
161
9
170
–
115
7
–
8
2,125
–
(171)
89
1
90
1,254
25
4
(22)
301
1,567
–
7,647
2,125
1,567
26
7,673
(5,150)
2,523
(4)
2,121
(1,208)
913
2
915
%
3.8
56.8
(5)
1,562
(579)
983
73
1,056
%
4.4
36.9
Total
US$m
7,746
8,431
3,003
3,940
6,943
1,226
1,326
171
4,010
1,193
31,046
(3,479)
27,567
(2,542)
25,025
–
–
4,517
4,517
–
–
–
–
12
12
–
12
–
12
(12)
(16,525)
–
–
–
8,500
95
8,595
%
35.5
59.9
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets ..................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ................
For footnotes, see page 130.
151,687
200,432
178,757
106,846
124,464
99,704
163,066
794,673
163,713
30,195
60,010
62,055
481
4,736
725
452,275
1,184,315
504,954
89,651
395,617
85,315
56
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
(2,198)
–
–
2,198
2,198
–
–
–
–
(29)
(29)
–
(29)
–
(29)
29
–
–
–
14
326
(39)
1
(38)
26
3
2
209
256
798
(181)
617
3
620
(921)
(301)
23
(278)
%
(1.2)
149.3
Total
US$m
8,289
7,108
2,842
1,687
4,529
144
624
183
1,298
1,428
23,603
(531)
23,072
(2,155)
20,917
(13,871)
7,046
(72)
6,974
%
31.5
60.1
US$m
392,499
828,701
419,365
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Europe
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
5,653
2,533
2,923
1,707
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
119
(6)
113
80
37
2
979
128
9,525
(331)
9,194
(1,838)
7,356
27
15
42
27
22
3
110
103
4,937
(19)
4,918
(386)
4,532
Total operating expenses ............
(5,447)
(2,298)
Operating profit/(loss) ................
1,909
2,234
Share of profit/(loss) in
associates and joint ventures ..
–
–
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
1,909
2,234
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ....................
%
8.6
59.2
%
10.1
46.7
1,222
1,673
2,636
(523)
2,113
11
413
171
–
957
675
869
99
2
101
–
149
5
–
13
6,560
1,812
–
–
6,560
1,812
64
6,624
(4,224)
2,400
(96)
2,304
%
10.4
64.4
2
1,814
(1,010)
804
1
805
%
3.6
55.7
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets ..................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ................
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
147,507
174,865
152,411
81,430
98,073
80,312
140,277
502,340
139,416
23,283
49,440
47,223
2
3,983
3
63,788
219,304
65,963
57
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Europe > Profit /(loss) before tax by customer group / Hong Kong
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business (continued)
Total
US$m
8,221
6,299
1,660
1,376
3,036
362
439
63
1,599
1,603
21,622
(818)
–
–
–
–
(216)
(216)
–
(216)
20,804
–
(1,929)
(216)
18,875
216
(12,639)
–
–
–
6,236
120
6,356
%
30.3
60.8
US$m
312,537
636,703
334,200
Europe
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
5,309
2,314
2,659
1,621
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
81
3
84
305
(4)
2
1,220
42
9,272
(577)
8,695
(1,711)
6,984
16
2
18
71
4
7
115
178
4,673
(62)
4,611
(378)
4,233
Total operating expenses ............
(5,058)
(2,301)
Operating profit/(loss) ................
1,926
1,932
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
6
7
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
1,932
1,939
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
%
9.2
58.2
%
9.2
49.9
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
95
295
(23)
(1,217)
–
–
(5)
1,217
(28)
1,217
827
1,339
1,493
159
1,652
17
396
27
–
1,252
5,510
–
548
730
93
–
93
–
27
9
–
18
1,425
–
5,510
1,425
155
5,665
(3,647)
2,018
96
2,114
%
10.1
66.2
5
1,430
(891)
539
–
539
%
2.6
62.5
(31)
16
18
264
329
958
(179)
779
–
779
(958)
(179)
11
(168)
%
(0.8)
122.9
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
120,302
143,095
122,118
66,965
80,864
61,789
107,899
367,893
109,086
17,368
40,971
41,206
3
3,880
1
34,218
168,062
45,075
58
Hong Kong
Profit/(loss) before tax by customer groups and global businesses
Personal Financial Services .............................................................................
Commercial Banking .......................................................................................
Global Banking and Markets ...........................................................................
Private Banking ...............................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Profit before tax
Net interest income ..........................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Net trading income ..........................................................................................
Net income/(expense) from financial instruments designated at fair value ...
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Dividend income ..............................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
Total operating income .................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders .
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions .................................................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .............................
Net operating income ....................................................................................
Total operating expenses .................................................................................
Operating profit .............................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...............................................
Profit before tax .............................................................................................
Share of HSBC’s profit before tax ..................................................................
Cost efficiency ratio ........................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
4,212
1,619
1,578
305
(375)
7,339
2006
US$m
2,880
1,321
955
201
(175)
5,182
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
5,483
3,362
1,242
676
94
31
2,797
845
14,530
(3,208)
11,322
(231)
11,091
(3,780)
7,311
28
7,339
%
30.3
33.4
2006
US$m
4,685
2,056
617
260
162
61
2,628
834
11,303
(2,699)
8,604
(172)
8,432
(3,269)
5,163
19
5,182
%
23.5
38.0
2005
US$m
2,628
955
922
190
(178)
4,517
2005
US$m
4,064
1,674
546
(6)
108
41
2,334
805
9,566
(2,059)
7,507
(146)
7,361
(2,867)
4,494
23
4,517
%
21.5
38.2
Year-end staff numbers (full-time equivalent) ................................................
27,655
27,586
25,931
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to customers (net) ...........................................................
Loans and advances to banks (net) ..................................................................
Trading assets, financial instruments designated at fair value, and
financial investments ...................................................................................
Total assets ......................................................................................................
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
For footnote, see page 130.
2007
US$m
89,638
63,737
102,180
332,691
6,420
234,488
At 31 December
2006
US$m
84,282
50,359
103,734
272,428
4,799
196,691
2005
US$m
83,208
42,751
81,631
235,376
4,708
173,726
59
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Hong Kong > 2007
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Economic briefing
Hong Kong’s economy remained robust during
2007, with the annual rate of growth of 6.3 per cent.
Domestic consumption was the major contributor to
economic expansion, supported by the strong labour
market. The unemployment rate fell to 3.4 per cent, a
nine year low, as the supply of labour remained very
tight. Global increases in food and oil prices affected
Hong Kong, but the territory also experienced wage
inflation, rising import prices and growth in property
rental costs. Inflation increased as a result, exceeding
3 per cent in the final quarter of the year.
In response to interest rate cuts in the US and
capital inflows into the local market, Hong Kong’s
main interest rate was cut on three separate
occasions during the final months of 2007, with the
prime rate ending the year at 6.75 per cent, down by
one per cent from its high for the year. Local asset
markets benefited accordingly. The previously very
strong levels of export growth slowed in the second
half of 2007, as demand from the US moderated and
the reduction in mainland China’s export tax rebate
in July temporarily affected Hong Kong’s re-exports.
Despite relatively modest trade growth, external
demand for Hong Kong’s services remained strong
due to the buoyant tourism sector and increasing
cross-border business activities, especially within the
financial sector.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
Reported
change
US$m
%
Underlying
change
%
4,685
2,056
1,863
8,604
(172)
8,432
(3,269)
5,163
19
5,182
(15)
(6)
(6)
(27)
1
(26)
9
(17)
-
(17)
4,670
2,050
1,857
8,577
(171)
8,406
(3,260)
5,146
19
5,165
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
813
1,312
620
2,745
5,483
3,362
2,477
11,322
(60)
(231)
2,685
11,091
(520)
(3,780)
2,165
7,311
9
28
2,174
7,339
17
64
33
32
(34)
32
(16)
42
47
42
17
64
33
32
(35)
32
(16)
42
47
42
Hong Kong
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 ...
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ....
Operating expenses ..........
Operating profit .............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax .............
For footnotes, see page 130.
Review of business performance
HSBC’s operations in Hong Kong reported a record
pre-tax profit of US$7.3 billion, an increase of
42 per cent compared with US$5.2 billion in 2006.
The underlying change was in line with the reported
change. Net operating income increased by 32 per
cent, double the rate of growth in operating
expenses.
In Personal Financial Services, performance was
driven by increased fee income, particularly from
retail brokerage and investment products, as well as
growth in net interest income following higher
deposit balances and lending. In Commercial
Banking, balance sheet growth was driven by
customer acquisition, increased trade flows and
supporting businesses expanding into mainland
60
China. In Global Banking and Markets, income
growth reflected improved performance in balance
sheet management, and strong results from the
trading businesses and securities services in the
buoyant economic environment. Higher demand for
structured products and mutual funds drove the
increased Private Banking profits. Cost efficiency
ratios improved in all customer groups.
The commentary that follows is on an
underlying basis.
Personal Financial Services reported a record
pre-tax profit of US$4.2 billion, an increase of
47 per cent compared with 2006, largely driven by
an increase in fee income in a year in which buoyant
stock markets encouraged high volumes of share
trading. The higher fee income, combined with
growth in loan and deposit balances, generated a rise
in net operating income of 37 per cent. The cost
efficiency ratio improved to 27.2 per cent. Increased
business volumes fed through to higher costs, but
these were considerably lower than revenue gains as
efficiencies were attained from productivity gains in
the sales force and the increased use of automated
channels and straight-through processing.
Net interest income grew by 16 per cent to
US$3.3 billion in 2007, due to better margins and
growth of average deposit balances. Effective
balance sheet management and the successful
marketing of key products, including HSBC Premier,
further contributed to deposit growth.
Average customer deposits grew by 10 per cent,
driven by a series of tactical campaigns and new
deposit initiatives, including Deposits SmartPicks,
which led to new customer acquisition. The relaunch
of Premier, which incorporates seamless
international banking connectivity and enhanced
service benefits, supported strong growth in the
number of customers using the service. At the end of
2007, the number of Premier customers was 15 per
cent higher than at the end of 2006, at more than
290,000.
An active property market was underpinned by
strong economic conditions and stable domestic
interest rates throughout most of the year. The
volume of new mortgages grew but spreads
tightened in a competitive market. The cross-selling
of mortgage-related insurance products, including
HomeSurance, enhanced overall revenue and
customer value. Premier customers were responsible
for 45 per cent of new mortgage balances while the
launch of a deposit-linked mortgage repayment plan
was successful in strengthening customer
relationships.
A number of credit card programmes were
launched in 2007 which successfully increased
overall card balances by 15 per cent, and the total
number of cards in circulation rose by 6 per cent to
4.9 million at the end of the year. HSBC’s credit
card business maintained its leading position in
terms of cards in circulation, spending and balances.
HSBC’s development of its investment and
wealth management platforms benefited from the
buoyant stock market in Hong Kong. This led to an
increase in fees from the sale of retail securities and
retail investment funds, leading to a 103 per cent
increase in net fee income to US$2.0 billion. This
was mainly due to higher trading volumes, reflecting
rising market turnover and value gains compared
with the prior year.
61
The volume of retail securities transactions
registered over 167 per cent growth with 80 per
cent of trades performed online. In response to
significant increases in market volumes during the
year, online trading capacity was augmented to
handle a four-fold increase in the peak number of
users. In the fourth quarter, credit-related liquidity
concerns, fears of a US recession and the
implementation of measures in mainland China to
dampen the economy led to equity market falls
which slowed the rate of growth of fee income from
share dealing and investment activities.
Over the course of 2007, investment market
sentiment together with continued IPO activity,
largely from mainland China, drove total funds
under management higher. The introduction of new
funds and the launch of awareness campaigns helped
to boost income from retail investment funds and
structured investment products by 144 per cent.
WealthMaster, a new portfolio wealth management
sales tool, was introduced during 2007 to support
branch staff sales of these products. Equity market
performance was a catalyst for significant increases
in broking income in Hong Kong.
Credit card fee income rose by 20 per cent, as
promotional campaigns led to increased cards in
circulation and contributed to a 17 per cent rise in
cardholder spending.
Life insurance commission income increased by
50 per cent, boosted by the launch of new products,
LifeInvest and LifeSave, a medical cover policy
incorporating retirement savings. HSBC extended its
market leadership position for share of life insurance
new business premiums. Emphasis on lower cost
online channels increased the percentage of non-life
policies sold through them to 53 per cent, while
distribution through telemarketing channels also
contributed to increased sales.
Loan impairment charges rose by 47 per cent
due to increased card balances. Despite a rise in
bankruptcies in Hong Kong, credit quality was stable
and non-performing loans as a percentage of
advances fell by 10 basis points.
Operating expenses rose by 16 per cent due to
higher performance-related pay and a rise in
premises costs as demand for space in Hong Kong
put upward pressure on rents. Increased marketing
expenses reflected business growth and the launch of
new initiatives. Higher IT costs were also incurred as
new systems were developed. The cost efficiency
ratio improved as increased revenues were delivered
by sales productivity gains and the use of direct
channels.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Hong Kong > 2007
Commercial Banking reported pre-tax profits
of US$1.6 billion, 23 per cent higher than in 2006,
due to strong balance sheet growth. The rise in asset
balances was supported by active marketing efforts
and increased trade volumes in Hong Kong. Higher
customer numbers across all segments helped to
boost deposits and fee income rose as a result of a
wider product range and increased sales of
investment products. The cost efficiency ratio
improved by 1.2 percentage points.
While strong economic growth was a stimulus
to revenue growth, HSBC also actively increased its
customer base by opening business banking branches
and adding frontline staff. Market share increased
for key products, including remittances and the
integrated account package, Business Vantage,
which attracted 36,000 new accounts. Revenues
from payments and cash management rose by 17 per
cent. A series of reward programmes and customer
events strengthened existing client relationships. The
launch of SmartForms for cross-border as well as
domestic account openings further improved
accessibility to services for small businesses. Total
customer numbers grew by 9 per cent.
Net interest income rose by 15 per cent as a
result of higher deposits, as strong economic growth
generated demand for savings products. New
customers based in mainland China increased the
small and mid-market client base and generated an
increase in Hong Kong dollar deposits. Foreign
currency deposits, including US dollars, also
increased significantly as global interest rates rose
and spreads were actively managed in a highly
competitive market.
Overall, loans and advances to customers grew
by 10 per cent as HSBC continued to increase its
lending to manufacturers who were expanding their
operations in mainland China, while intra-Asian
trade flows continued to accelerate. HSBC also
promoted its Green Equipment Financing option to
borrowers in Hong Kong to enable them to finance
energy-efficient equipment. Successful cross-border
referrals rose by 95 per cent, due to continued
initiatives promoting regional interaction. Hang Seng
Bank also targeted the cross-border activity of small
and medium-sized businesses by promoting its
import and export products. Market competition
squeezed asset spreads on lending to corporate and
mid-market business customers.
Increased sales of packaged products to small
and micro businesses were partially driven by
lending campaigns for equipment financing and
micro lending.
62
The business card launched by HSBC in 2006
was quickly adopted; in 2007, over 21,000 new
business credit cards were issued. Spreads, however,
tightened due to competitive pressures.
Net fee income of US$526 million was 16 per
cent higher, driven by increased sales of investment
products, remittances, and trade services. Demand
from commercial clients for retail securities, unit
trusts and structured products helped fee income
from these products to rise by 173 per cent.
Remittance income rose by 26 per cent, boosted by
an increase in transaction volumes. In addition, a
focus on straight-through processing and simplified
account opening procedures attracted customers to
fee-based products as the convenience of the internet
and other direct options provided them with more
flexible options for their business operations.
As a result of several commercial insurance
marketing campaigns launched during the year, and
a realigned sales force, insurance fee income
increased by 11 per cent and net earned insurance
premiums rose by 37 per cent. Composite sales
teams were established to enable general insurance
sales managers to also sell life products.
Improved trading income was underpinned by
exchange rate volatility, which drove increased
payments and trade activity as well as income from
foreign exchange and derivatives. Targeted
marketing and the enhancement of Business Internet
Banking (‘BIB’) to include forward contracts helped
to increase transactions. Trading between US and
Hong Kong dollars and the hedging of renminbi
transactions also led to higher transaction volumes.
Loan impairment charges fell sharply by 59 per
cent due to releases of provisions in a stable credit
environment.
Expenses rose by 12 per cent as a result of
higher staff costs and rising commercial rents. Staff
cost increases reflected a combination of wage
inflation, performance-related compensation and the
costs of additional client-facing staff to support
enhanced product offerings. In addition, marketing
costs rose to support branding and campaign activity.
A total of 176,000 customers were registered as
internet users at the end of 2007, reflecting wide
adoption of direct channel offerings. The BIB site
was relaunched in the first quarter of the year,
leading to processing cost efficiencies. Call centres
were also re-engineered to promote the sale of
packaged products. Transactions through direct
channels constituted 40 per cent of the total number
of transactions.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit of
US$305 million. Excluding a US$39 million
geographical reclassification, the underlying increase
was 72 per cent. Client demand for structured
products increased, encouraged by the buoyant
stock market. The cost efficiency ratio improved
by 6.4 percentage points to 43.1 per cent.
Excluding a US$42 million geographic
reclassification, net interest income grew
substantially. A significant rise was recorded in both
deposits and lending. An increase in relationship
managers and HSBC’s brand reputation attracted
new deposits, and clients continued to leverage their
investments due to the relatively low cost of
borrowing. This was supported by improved treasury
performance, as US dollar and Hong Kong dollar
interest rates declined.
Fee income rose by 46 per cent as more clients
invested in mutual funds to take advantage of the
local stock market performance. In addition, the
promotion of discretionary products further
contributed to the rise in revenues. The SIS product,
which provides clients with externally managed
portfolios tailored to their specific needs, proved
particularly popular.
Trading income also benefited from the strength
of equity markets, with a 59 per cent increase to
US$280 million. Demand for alternative funds and
structured equity products was high, particularly for
the Forward Accumulator, a product linked to the
Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Client assets grew by 43 per cent to
US$72.7 billion. Net new money contributed to
49 per cent of the increase, driven by a rise in the
number of relationship managers and a wide variety
of discretionary products. Cross-referrals from other
customer groups also increased, with inward
referrals from other customer groups contributing
US$898 million of net new money.
Operating expenses were 17 per cent higher
at US$231 million, mainly due to increased
employee numbers, predominantly in the front
office, higher remuneration and performance-related
bonuses awarded in order to retain key staff in a very
buoyant market.
Within Other, the non-recurrence of gains in
2006 from the sale of properties and investments,
notably the sale of UTI Bank Limited and the then
Hang Seng head office building, resulted in a higher
pre-tax loss in this segment.
Global Banking and Markets in Hong Kong
reported a pre-tax profit of US$1.6 billion, which
represented a rise of 65 per cent compared with
2006. This was principally due to a recovery in
balance sheet management revenues, a strong
performance in Global Markets, including significant
growth in fees from securities services, and higher
income from payments and cash management. The
cost efficiency ratio improved by 10.5 percentage
points.
Total operating income increased by 43 per cent
to US$2.6 billion, rising significantly as balance
sheet management revenues recovered and Global
Markets benefited from market volatility, boosting
trading income from structured derivatives, foreign
exchange and equities.
Along with the improvement in balance sheet
management performance, net interest income
growth was driven by the continued rise in deposit
balances and related margins, reflecting the buoyant
local markets.
Net fee income rose by 28 per cent as the strong
equities market and healthy investor confidence
drove increases in volumes in securities services.
Assets under custody rose by 56 per cent due to
strong growth in new business.
Trading income increased by 20 per cent,
mainly from foreign exchange, structured
derivatives, equities and rates. Global Markets
benefited from interest rate volatility during the year
and a buoyant equity market backed by mainland
Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong, as well as
currency volatility as regional currencies rose against
the US dollar. Structured products generated strong
earnings, particularly due to higher sales of products
incorporating equity derivatives. Initiatives taken in
previous years to extend the product range, ongoing
investments in technical and operating capabilities,
and sustained cross-sales efforts stimulated revenue
growth.
The corporate credit environment remained
benign with a small loan impairment charge,
compared with a net release in 2006.
Operating expenses of US$1.0 billion rose by
13 per cent, 30 percentage points less than revenue
growth. The expansion of certain businesses,
including equities, structured derivatives and
securities services resulted in higher operational
expenses. Staff cost growth reflected performance
incentives in line with the rise in revenues, and
higher staff numbers.
63
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Hong Kong >2006
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Economic briefing
Hong Kong experienced sustained economic
expansion in the second half of 2006 with growth,
particularly in exports, regaining momentum
following a mild slowdown in the second quarter.
Domestic demand underpinned the economy
throughout 2006 despite volatility in the stock
market, which suffered a correction in the second
quarter but recovered strongly in the second half of
the year. Falling unemployment, improved
household incomes and positive longer-term
economic prospects were the key elements
supporting domestic consumption. Hong Kong’s
unemployment rate fell to a six-year low of 4.4 per
cent towards the end of 2006, and the labour market
began to tighten in certain sectors, with wage
pressure increasingly evident. Despite this, inflation
remained low, averaging 2 per cent in 2006.
Investment growth surged in the second half of the
year as the local interest rate cycle peaked. The
residential property market divided, with prices of
luxury property exceeding levels last seen in the
boom in 1997 while, elsewhere in the sector, activity
and prices remained flat. At the same time,
investment in the construction sector was weak in
the absence of large-scale infrastructure projects and
general uncertainty. Externally, trade performance
improved in the second half of 2006 following
difficulties in the first half of the year due to volatile
external demand from western markets.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
4,064
1,674
1,769
7,507
(146)
7,361
(2,867)
4,494
23
4,517
5
2
1
8
–
8
(3)
5
–
5
4,069
1,676
1,770
7,515
(146)
7,369
(2,870)
4,499
23
4,522
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
616
380
93
1,089
4,685
2,056
1,863
8,604
(26)
(172)
1,063
8,432
(399)
(3,269)
664
(4)
660
5,163
19
5,182
Reported
change
%
15
23
5
15
(18)
15
(14)
15
(17)
15
Underlying
change
%
15
23
5
14
(18)
14
(14)
15
(17)
15
Hong Kong
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 .....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses ..........
Operating profit ...............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
Review of business performance
The following commentary is on an underlying
HSBC’s operations in Hong Kong reported a
pre-tax profit of US$5.2 billion compared with
US$4.5 billion in 2005, an increase of 15 per cent.
On an underlying basis, pre-tax profit also grew by
15 per cent. Underlying net operating income
increased by 14 per cent, driven by widening deposit
spreads in Personal Financial Services and
Commercial Banking and strong net fee income
growth in all customer groups. In Global Banking
and Markets, an increase in trading income offset the
negative impact of lower balance sheet management
income. Underlying operating expenses rose by
14 per cent.
basis.
Personal Financial Services pre-tax profits
increased by 9 per cent to US$2.9 billion. Net
operating income before impairment charges grew
by 13 per cent, driven by higher income from
savings and current accounts and increased fee
income. Marketing activities were successful,
helping HSBC enlarge its share of the credit card
and mortgage markets and attract higher deposit
balances. As a result, customer numbers increased
by over 100,000. The cost efficiency ratio improved
by 1.1 percentage points as cost growth of 9 per cent
was restricted to less than the increase in net
revenue. Credit quality remained favourable and
64
loan impairment charges were low, although higher
than in 2005 when a modest recovery was recorded.
Net interest income of US$2.9 billion was
10 per cent higher than in 2005, principally as a
result of deposit growth and wider liability spreads.
Average savings balances increased by 7 per cent
to US$119 billion, reflecting the success of
promotional campaigns and HSBC’s competitive
pricing strategy, and supported by increased demand
for deposit products in the rising interest rate
environment. Effective deposit pricing amid rising
interest rates led to wider deposit spreads.
HSBC increased its share of new mortgage
business to 33 per cent, the highest of any lender,
benefiting from the launch of a simplified,
transparent pricing structure in the first half of
2006 which was supported by extensive media
coverage. The relaunch of a number of key products
and the introduction of a two-month interest free
offer in the fourth quarter of 2006 also contributed to
the increase in market share. Excluding the reduction
in balances under the Government Home Ownership
Scheme, HSBC’s mortgage portfolio grew by 7 per
cent to US$23 billion.
Average cardholder balances increased by
16 per cent to US$3.5 billion and HSBC issued over
1 million new cards during 2006, which led to a
17 per cent rise in cards in issue to a record
4.6 million. The launch of a mass card acquisition
programme comprising increased promotional
activity, direct marketing and the use of incentives to
increase cardholder spending contributed directly to
this rise. As a result, HSBC’s share of the Hong
Kong credit card market increased to 46 per cent of
card receivable balances.
Net fee income increased by 32 per cent to
US$977 million. Buoyant regional and global stock
markets led to increased demand for equity-based
products among local investors and HSBC
responded by launching 69 new investment funds,
including a number of innovative fund products,
designed to meet investors’ changing demands in a
rising interest rate environment. These launches
were supported by greater marketing activity,
improved pricing transparency and the development
of new customer retention activities. As a result,
sales of unit trusts rose by 61 per cent and fee
income from the sale of investment products,
and custody and broking activities increased by
39 per cent.
The increase in cards in issue led to a 24 per
cent rise in credit card fees. Expansion of the current
account base, partly due to higher sales of packaged
products, led to increased remittance and account
65
servicing fees. HSBC focused on attracting
additional funds from existing Premier customers
during 2006 and deposits managed on their behalf
increased by 29 per cent, reflecting the success of
marketing campaigns and enhanced customer
benefits.
Insurance fee income increased by 21 per cent
and insurance premiums rose by 13 per cent. The
development of HSBC’s retirement planning
proposition was reflected in the launch of new
savings, protection and medical insurance products,
supported by increased promotional and marketing
activity and the successful development of internet
and telephone distribution channels. As a result,
sales of life and non-life insurance products rose.
Gains less losses from financial investments
increased to US$14 million, reflecting proceeds from
the MasterCard Incorporated IPO. In July 2006,
HSBC transferred most of its Asian card acquiring
business into a joint venture with Global Payments
Inc. HSBC retained a 44 per cent stake in the new
venture and recognised an overall gain on transfer of
US$55 million, of which US$12 million was
allocated to the Hong Kong Personal Financial
Services business and reported in ‘Other operating
income’.
Following a net release in 2005, loan
impairment charges of US$119 million reflected
asset growth and lower releases and recoveries. In
2005, rising property prices led to the release of
impairment allowances against HSBC’s mortgage
lending portfolio and against restructured lending
facilities, neither of which were repeated in 2006.
Increased staff numbers, additional marketing
activity and higher IT expenditure led to a 9 per cent
rise in operating expenses. Staff recruited to support
extended opening hours, together with higher
performance-related remuneration and annual pay
rises, led to increased employment costs. These
were mitigated by a reduction in branch back-office
staff numbers as customers utilised lower-cost
distribution channels for an increasing proportion
of their banking business. Rising Hong Kong
commercial property rental yields in 2006 coincided
with the expansion of certain branches with high
growth potential and resulted in higher premises
costs. Marketing costs rose in support of promotional
activity related to credit cards, insurance and wealth
management products. Similarly, IT expenditure
rose as improved portfolio management systems and
enhanced channel capabilities were delivered in
order to drive revenue growth.
In Commercial Banking, pre-tax profits
increased significantly by 38 per cent to
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Hong Kong >2006
US$1.3 billion. Net operating income grew by 32 per
cent, driven by higher deposit balances and fee
income, increased liability spreads and lower loan
impairment charges. Cost growth was comfortably
within the growth in revenues, and the cost
efficiency ratio improved by 1.1 percentage points to
26.1 per cent.
During 2006, HSBC launched a number of
initiatives designed to further its position in the small
business banking market, including customer service
enhancements, improvements to account opening
procedures and targeted promotional activity. As a
result, Commercial Banking customer numbers
increased (by 13,000 to 377,000), as did the number
of products sold per customer. Investments to
enhance the attractiveness of HSBC’s distribution
channels improved customer service, facilitated
customer acquisition and encouraged the migration
of routine transactions to automated channels.
Net interest income rose by 23 per cent to
US$1.3 billion. Deposit and current account balances
increased by 10 per cent, partly due to the
deployment of a team dedicated to attracting
deposits from small businesses, and other service
enhancements. BusinessVantage, HSBC’s market
leading integrated account for business, reinforced
its leadership position through increased promotional
activity, including a new referral programme. HSBC
opened over 25,000 new BusinessVantage accounts
in 2006, 21 per cent more than in 2005. Interest rate
rises led to a 30 basis point widening of deposit and
current account spreads and contributed to increased
demand for savings products.
Non-trade lending balances increased by 16 per
cent to US$16.8 billion. The continued strength of
the Hong Kong economy and, most importantly, its
proximity to the strongly growing mainland Chinese
market, led to increased business activity among
mid-market clients, resulting in higher demand for
credit. Lending to the property and retail sectors was
particularly strong, while manufacturers with
operations in mainland China raised borrowings to
fund further expansion and take advantage of both
the growing Chinese domestic market and the strong
export climate. HSBC’s regional alignment
programme, which is designed to identify and
capitalise on cross-border financing opportunities
between Hong Kong, mainland China, Taiwan and
Vietnam was instrumental in contributing to the
growth in mid-market lending balances.
Growth in small business lending was facilitated
through a streamlined lending process and the
adoption of a new credit scorecard. As a result, the
number of small business customers borrowing from
66
HSBC increased by 12 per cent and small business
lending balances rose by 9 per cent. Increased
competition led to a 12 basis point narrowing of
asset spreads.
Net fee income of US$454 million was 13 per
cent higher than in 2005. Cash management and
remittance fees increased by 18 per cent, driven by
growth in the number of current account customers,
enhancements to the product range and increased
cross-border remittances. Robust local equity
markets prompted the launch of 88 new investment
products amid resurgent demand. Sales of unit trusts
were consequently 15 per cent higher, while
derivative and structured product sales rose by
83 per cent.
The establishment of a new Commercial
Banking insurance business in October 2005
contributed to life insurance policy sales more than
doubling and an 18 per cent rise in non-life policies
in force. As a result, insurance fee income more
than doubled and premium income increased by
23 per cent.
Effective promotion contributed to a 31 per cent
rise in receivables finance fee income, while
increased hedging activity and a rise in the value of
multi-currency transactions by Commercial Banking
customers contributed to a 57 per cent increase in
treasury income.
The transfer of the majority of HSBC’s card
acquiring business into a joint venture with Global
Payments Inc. realised a gain of US$13 million for
Commercial Banking, reported in ‘Other operating
income’. Fee income in HSBC’s remaining card
acquiring business not included in the transfer rose
by 43 per cent, reflecting an increase in the number
of merchant customers and higher transaction values.
Loan impairment charges decreased by 59 per
cent, principally due to the non-recurrence of
significant charges against a single client in 2005.
Credit quality remained strong and non-performing
loans as a proportion of lending balances fell by
22 basis points to 62 basis points, reflecting prudent
lending policies and risk mitigation procedures.
Operating expenses increased by 17 per cent to
US$491 million to support the strong revenue
opportunities evident in the market. The recruitment
of additional sales and support staff and the
development of the Commercial Banking insurance
business contributed to higher staff numbers which,
together with the effect of pay rises, resulted in
higher staff costs. Marketing costs rose as HSBC
stepped up its advertising and promotional activity,
including the launch of the global Commercial
Banking campaign to build market share. Cost
efficiency was improved by the continuing migration
of sales and transaction activity to lower-cost direct
channels.
Global Banking and Markets reported a
pre-tax profit of US$955 million, an increase of
3 per cent compared with 2005. Global Markets
performance remained robust, with encouraging
revenue growth in areas in which HSBC has
invested, complemented by strong income growth in
the securities services business. The cost efficiency
ratio increased slightly, primarily due to the first
full year effect of various growth initiatives taken
in 2005.
certain local markets. Investments in equity sales and
trading operations in previous years led to higher
revenues. HSBC also benefited from internal
synergies linking product structuring and hedging
capabilities with distribution scale, as foreign
exchange option-linked deposits and other
instruments were offered to retail and corporate
customers.
Private Equity investments also performed
strongly. However, Credit and Rates were adversely
affected by lower volumes due to unfavourable
market conditions in a rising interest rate
environment.
The overall credit environment remained stable
Total operating income of US$1.8 billion was
with a net recovery of US$27 million.
7 per cent higher. Although balance sheet
management reported an overall decline, revenues
recovered modestly in the second half of 2006 as
lower yielding positions matured. In Global
Banking, net interest income from payments and
cash management activity rose sharply as a 6 per
cent increase in deposits was complemented by
wider spreads. Revenues benefited from improved
customer flows following the launch of services
offered through HSBCnet in the latter part of 2005.
Income from lending activities decreased as the
benefit of higher lending balances was more than
offset by the effect of spread compression resulting
from an abundance of credit in a highly competitive
market.
Net fee income rose by 24 per cent. Securities
services reported a 28 per cent increase in fees as
buoyant stock markets drove higher customer
activity. Debt underwriting volumes increased as
tightening credit spreads encouraged issuers to lock
in to the favourable credit environment by extending
the term of finance or by raising new debt in local
markets. By contrast, equity underwriting fees
declined.
HSBC Global Asset Management used HSBC’s
extensive distribution network to take advantage of
the global trend of strong investment flows to
emerging markets. Higher fees reflected strong
performance fees from HSBC’s emerging market
funds. Client funds under management grew by
23 per cent to US$35 billion, as HSBC launched new
funds to capture increased demand for equity-based
investments. Fees from the asset and structured
finance business also rose.
Net trading income increased by 18 per cent.
HSBC retained its leadership position in foreign
exchange, with revenues strengthening as trading
activity increased in response to volatility in the
value of the US dollar and economic conditions in
67
Operating expenses increased by 12 per cent to
US$911 million, primarily due to the first full year
effect of initiatives implemented in the second half
of 2005 which extended the product range in Global
Markets and strengthened the regional investment
banking platform in Hong Kong.
Additional cost increase reflected a rise in
performance-related remuneration coupled with
higher operational costs in line with increased
volumes, particularly in payments and cash
management and securities services businesses.
Private Banking contributed a pre-tax profit of
US$201 million, an increase of 5 per cent compared
with 2005. Growth in client assets and rising sales of
higher fee-generating discretionary managed
products were partially offset by the adverse effect
of a flattening yield curve on income from the
investment of surplus liquidity. Demand for
experienced private banking staff in Hong Kong was
fierce as competitors built up their locally-based
operations and, despite strong revenue growth,
the resultant increase in staff costs led to a
5.2 percentage points deterioration in the cost
efficiency ratio to 49.5 per cent.
Net interest income was US$76 million, in line
with 2005. Steady growth in deposit balances was
offset by competitive pressure on deposit rates and
by a challenging interest rate environment for
treasury management activities. Loans and advances
to customers at 31 December 2006 were marginally
lower than at the same point in 2005 as higher
interest rates reduced clients’ appetite for credit.
There was excellent growth in fee income,
which increased to US$123 million, a rise of 31 per
cent. Growth in funds under management and
success in increasing the proportion of clients’ assets
invested in higher fee-earning discretionary managed
assets contributed towards increased fee revenue.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Hong Kong >2006 / Profit/(loss) before tax by customer group
Fee income growth also benefited from increased
client holdings of funds and alternative investments.
Trading and other revenues were 18 per cent higher
at US$199 million, driven largely by sales of bonds
and structured products.
Client assets increased by 27 per cent to
US$51 billion, with net new money inflows of
US$8 billion. This growth was assisted by better
marketing and successful product placement,
including a broadening of the discretionary managed
product range. Sales of HSBC’s discretionary
managed SIS and CIS products, in which the value
of investments by clients reached US$1.4 billion,
continued to be a key driver of this asset class.
Continued investment in relationship management,
improved stock market performance and growing
cross-referrals from within the Group, primarily the
retail and commercial networks, also added to the
growth.
Operating expenses were 31 per cent higher than
in 2005, primarily due to increased staff costs driven
by recruitment and the retention of front office staff
in a competitive market, where demand for
experienced private bankers was high. Performance-
related remuneration rose, reflecting strong revenue
growth and a 19 per cent increase in customer
relationship staff. Increased marketing expenditure
and technology costs were incurred in support of
growing the business.
The sale of part of HSBC’s interest in UTI Bank
Limited resulted in gains of US$101 million,
recognised in Other. The disposal of Hang Seng’s
head office building realised a gain of
US$100 million and the resulting reduction in
HSBC’s investment property portfolio, together with
slower growth in the Hong Kong property market,
led to lower property revaluation gains.
Increased US interest rates led to higher costs of
servicing US dollar denominated floating rate
subordinated debt, partly offset by higher earnings
on centrally held funds. In 2006, HSBC benefited
from higher dividend income from strategic
investments. Hong Kong head office and central IT
costs rose, reflecting increased activity in support of
HSBC’s growing Asian businesses, offset by higher
recoveries from other customer groups.
68
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
3,342
1,973
Commercial
Banking
US$m
1,540
526
188
5
193
820
–
2
2,654
153
9,137
(3,116)
6,021
(175)
5,846
(1,639)
4,207
63
–
63
(13)
–
1
130
28
2,275
(82)
2,193
(28)
2,165
(547)
1,618
Hong Kong
Net interest income/(expense) .. ..
Net fee income ............................
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income on trading
activities ..................................
Net trading income5 .....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance
premiums ................................
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ..............
Loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions .....
Net operating income ...............
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) ..............
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
986
682
553
241
794
7
38
6
13
114
2,640
(10)
2,630
(28)
2,602
(1,025)
1,577
5
1
1
Profit/(loss) before tax ..............
4,212
1,619
1,578
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
%
17.4
27.2
%
6.7
24.9
%
6.5
39.0
70
179
280
–
280
–
1
–
–
6
536
–
536
–
536
(231)
305
–
305
%
1.3
43.1
312
–
–
(312)
(312)
–
–
–
–
(337)
(337)
–
(337)
–
(337)
337
–
–
–
(767)
2
186
38
224
(138)
55
22
–
881
279
–
279
–
279
(675)
(396)
21
(375)
%
(1.6)
241.9
Total
US$m
5,483
3,362
1,270
(28)
1,242
676
94
31
2,797
845
14,530
(3,208)
11,322
(231)
11,091
(3,780)
7,311
28
7,339
%
30.3
33.4
US$m
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
38,197
72,386
129,159
25,890
35,366
51,562
19,171
185,933
37,364
4,329
14,138
15,649
2,051
24,868
754
89,638
332,691
234,488
53,725
74,189
6,251
69
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Hong Kong > Profit/(loss) before tax by customer group
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business (continued)
Hong Kong
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
2,882
977
1,344
454
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income on trading
activities ..................................
Net trading income5 .....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) ................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
84
4
88
373
14
1
2,519
202
7,056
(2,638)
4,418
(119)
4,299
(1,422)
2,877
57
–
57
(53)
–
1
95
33
1,931
(50)
1,881
(69)
1,812
(491)
1,321
3
–
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
2,880
1,321
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
%
13.0
32.2
%
6.0
26.1
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
553
534
573
88
661
5
(1)
2
14
81
1,849
(11)
1,838
27
1,865
(911)
954
1
955
%
4.3
49.6
76
123
176
–
176
1
9
–
–
13
398
–
398
–
398
(197)
201
–
201
%
0.9
49.5
476
–
–
(476)
(476)
–
–
–
–
(276)
(276)
–
(276)
–
(276)
276
–
–
–
(646)
(32)
34
77
111
(66)
140
57
–
781
345
–
345
(11)
334
(524)
(190)
15
(175)
%
(0.7)
151.9
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
Total
US$m
4,685
2,056
924
(307)
617
260
162
61
2,628
834
11,303
(2,699)
8,604
(172)
8,432
(3,269)
5,163
19
5,182
%
23.5
38.0
US$m
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
35,445
57,348
118,201
23,520
29,786
41,493
20,270
153,200
24,530
3,081
10,462
11,991
1,966
21,632
476
84,282
272,428
196,691
45,023
80,036
4,363
70
Hong Kong
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income ............................
2,618
740
1,096
402
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ....
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums ..
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) .................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
607
431
601
(40)
561
14
–
18
19
83
1,733
(9)
1,724
7
1,731
(809)
922
–
922
%
4.4
46.9
75
93
140
–
140
–
16
–
–
13
337
–
337
3
340
(150)
190
–
190
%
0.9
44.5
197
–
–
(197)
(197)
–
–
–
–
(238)
(238)
–
(238)
–
(238)
238
–
–
–
(529)
8
(83)
10
(73)
23
92
20
–
682
223
–
223
1
224
(422)
(198)
20
(178)
%
(0.9)
189.0
67
–
67
41
–
1
2,238
230
5,935
(2,016)
3,919
11
3,930
(1,305)
2,625
3
2,628
%
12.5
33.3
48
–
48
(84)
–
2
77
35
1,576
(34)
1,542
(168)
1,374
(419)
955
–
955
%
4.6
27.2
Total
US$m
4,064
1,674
773
(227)
546
(6)
108
41
2,334
805
9,566
(2,059)
7,507
(146)
7,361
(2,867)
4,494
23
4,517
%
21.5
38.2
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
34,318
52,798
105,801
20,292
25,625
37,417
23,712
133,005
21,070
3,107
7,621
9,216
1,779
16,327
222
83,208
235,376
173,726
39,164
63,813
4,373
71
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > Profit/(loss) before tax
Rest of Asia-Pacific (including the Middle East)
Profit/(loss) before tax by country within customer groups and global businesses
Year to 31 December 2007
Australia ............................................................
India ..................................................................
Indonesia ...........................................................
Japan .................................................................
Mainland China ................................................
Associates .....................................................
Other mainland China ..................................
Malaysia ............................................................
Middle East .......................................................
Egypt ............................................................
United Arab Emirates ...................................
Other Middle East ........................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) .........
Saudi Arabia .................................................
Singapore ..........................................................
South Korea ......................................................
Taiwan ..............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year to 31 December 2006
Australia ............................................................
India ..................................................................
Indonesia ...........................................................
Japan .................................................................
Mainland China ................................................
Associates .....................................................
Other mainland China ..................................
Malaysia ............................................................
Middle East .......................................................
Egypt ............................................................
United Arab Emirates ...................................
Other Middle East ........................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) .........
Saudi Arabia .................................................
Singapore ..........................................................
South Korea ......................................................
Taiwan ..............................................................
Other .................................................................
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
41
(70)
(7)
(34)
494
516
(22)
81
245
10
108
83
201
44
101
(44)
(52)
5
760
37
88
29
(3)
397
351
46
90
482
46
262
101
409
73
112
(20)
27
111
42
429
86
75
369
220
149
146
495
65
242
116
423
72
240
159
144
279
1,350
2,464
–
(1)
–
–
–
–
–
–
3
–
3
–
3
–
90
–
–
–
92
4
83
(4)
5
1,101
1,093
8
13
82
32
2
–
34
48
7
28
4
20
124
529
104
43
2,361
2,180
181
330
1,307
153
617
300
1,070
237
550
123
123
415
1,343
6,009
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
76
(24)
(22)
(3)
276
274
2
77
235
9
70
59
138
97
73
(55)
(179)
23
477
32
46
46
(2)
241
210
31
87
356
41
209
67
317
39
90
(20)
37
121
46
277
69
49
167
86
81
99
396
41
145
70
256
140
145
115
118
168
1,034
1,649
–
2
–
(1)
–
–
–
(1)
2
–
3
(1)
2
–
68
–
–
10
80
–
92
(22)
80
24
5
19
12
46
20
(2)
(1)
17
29
(11)
19
1
46
287
154
393
71
123
708
575
133
274
1,035
111
425
194
730
305
365
59
(23)
368
3,527
72
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
Year to 31 December 2005
Australia ............................................................
India ..................................................................
Indonesia ...........................................................
Japan .................................................................
Mainland China ................................................
Associates .....................................................
Other mainland China ..................................
Malaysia ............................................................
Middle East .......................................................
Egypt ............................................................
United Arab Emirates ...................................
Other Middle East ........................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) .........
Saudi Arabia .................................................
Singapore ..........................................................
South Korea ......................................................
Taiwan ..............................................................
Other .................................................................
15
(15)
15
–
42
36
6
39
208
6
51
54
111
97
65
(11)
(21)
40
377
25
21
39
(1)
168
140
28
65
296
29
171
75
275
21
68
(5)
17
125
818
Loans and advances to customers (net) by country
Australia ...........................................................................................................
India .................................................................................................................
Indonesia ..........................................................................................................
Japan ................................................................................................................
Mainland China ...............................................................................................
Malaysia ...........................................................................................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) ............................................................
Egypt ...........................................................................................................
United Arab Emirates ..................................................................................
Other Middle East .......................................................................................
Singapore .........................................................................................................
South Korea .....................................................................................................
Taiwan .............................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
51
166
55
4
111
58
53
119
297
22
119
45
186
111
100
97
74
133
1,207
2007
US$m
11,339
7,220
1,642
4,258
11,647
8,856
21,607
1,853
14,103
5,651
11,505
7,124
3,658
12,996
101,852
–
–
–
3
–
–
–
(1)
1
–
1
–
1
–
68
–
–
7
78
–
40
4
(7)
13
4
9
14
19
12
–
–
12
7
(12)
13
(2)
12
94
At 31 December
2006
US$m
8,775
4,915
1,337
3,391
6,065
7,747
15,622
965
10,148
4,509
9,610
6,260
3,974
9,878
77,574
91
212
113
(1)
334
238
96
236
821
69
342
174
585
236
289
94
68
317
2,574
2005
US$m
9,412
3,546
1,221
3,190
4,935
6,400
13,154
774
8,496
3,884
9,841
5,286
3,817
9,214
70,016
73
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2007
Customer accounts by country
Australia ...........................................................................................................
India .................................................................................................................
Indonesia ..........................................................................................................
Japan ................................................................................................................
Mainland China ...............................................................................................
Malaysia ...........................................................................................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) ............................................................
Egypt ...........................................................................................................
United Arab Emirates ..................................................................................
Other Middle East .......................................................................................
Singapore .........................................................................................................
South Korea .....................................................................................................
Taiwan .............................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
11,418
12,021
2,574
4,657
14,537
11,701
30,937
4,056
18,455
8,426
28,962
5,760
9,426
18,240
At 31 December
2006
US$m
8,491
7,936
2,082
4,186
6,941
9,640
21,196
2,703
11,166
7,327
23,517
3,890
7,675
13,441
150,233
108,995
2005
US$m
7,458
5,146
1,826
5,892
4,826
7,795
15,658
1,992
8,761
4,905
19,562
3,554
5,718
11,683
89,118
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Economic briefing
Mainland China’s economy continued to grow
strongly, with GDP rising by 11.4 per cent in 2007,
the fifth consecutive year of double-digit growth;
this was despite a combination of measures aimed at
curbing investment, such as increases in interest
rates and reserve ratios required for banks. Economic
performance remained primarily dependent on
investment and exports. Bank loan growth also
remained very strong. Export growth slowed from
very high levels as the year progressed, reflecting the
mild downturn in global trade. Consumer spending
grew steadily in 2007, with retail sales rising by
about 16 per cent. Inflationary pressures increased,
with consumer price inflation exceeding 6 per cent
towards the end of the year, mainly due to higher
food prices. Mainland China’s foreign exchange
reserves rose further, to more than US$1.5 trillion,
while the renminbi appreciated by over 5 per cent
against the US dollar in 2007.
Japan’s economy, the largest in the region,
expanded modestly in 2007. Private capital
investment decelerated after five years of firm
growth but a rise in exports, especially to Asia,
drove overall growth. Private consumption also
made a positive contribution, helped by a gradual
increase in employees’ income. Core consumer price
inflation remained around zero throughout the course
of the year.
In the Middle East, economies continued to
grow, although growth rates slowed slightly on those
recorded in 2006, largely as a result of OPEC-
mandated cuts in oil production. Underlying
74
economic performance was robust, however, led by
continued non-oil sector growth. The catalyst for
expansion was a fifth consecutive year of rising oil
prices, which facilitated continued growth in public
and private investment. Consumption rose as
employment levels increased and low interest rates
supported an ongoing expansion in credit. Strong
population growth, accelerated in parts of the region
by high levels of immigration, also boosted demand
for credit. High oil revenues resulted in a further
year of fiscal and current account surpluses
throughout the Middle East, boosting reserves and
holdings of overseas assets. Rapid economic growth,
low interest rates and currency weakness increased
inflation, however, fuelling demands in some
quarters for adjustments to the long-standing dollar
pegs. Regional equity markets recovered from their
2005-06 downturns to perform strongly in 2007.
Elsewhere in the region, the Indian economy
expanded by 8.7 per cent in 2007, although there
was evidence that recent interest rate rises and the
strength of the rupee were slowing some areas of the
economy, and inflationary pressures eased in 2007.
The economies of Vietnam and Singapore recorded
strong performances too, expanding by 8.5 per cent
and 7.7 per cent, respectively in 2007. Growth was
approximately 6 per cent in Indonesia and Malaysia.
Domestic demand in all these countries has become
an increasingly important source of GDP growth
with investment, particularly in the construction
sector, expanding rapidly. Inflationary pressures
intensified in 2007, largely as a result of higher oil
and food prices, but remained under control. The
South Korean economy accelerated in 2007 as
exports continued to flourish and household
spending recovered from levels recorded in 2006.
Profit before tax
Year ended 31 December
Rest of Asia-Pacific (including the Middle East)
Net interest income ..........................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Net trading income ..........................................................................................
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ....................
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Gains arising from dilution of interests in associates .....................................
Dividend income ..............................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
Total operating income .................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders .
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ................................................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .............................
Net operating income ....................................................................................
Total operating expenses .................................................................................
Operating profit .............................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...............................................
Profit before tax .............................................................................................
Share of HSBC’s profit before tax ..................................................................
Cost efficiency ratio ........................................................................................
2007
US$m
4,143
2,246
1,643
111
38
1,081
8
226
798
10,294
(253)
10,041
(616)
9,425
(4,764)
4,661
1,348
6,009
%
24.8
47.4
2006
US$m
3,047
1,622
1,181
79
41
–
5
174
765
6,914
(192)
6,722
(512)
6,210
(3,548)
2,662
865
3,527
%
16.0
52.8
2005
US$m
2,412
1,340
860
58
18
–
5
155
335
5,183
(166)
5,017
(134)
4,883
(2,762)
2,121
453
2,574
%
12.3
55.1
Year-end staff numbers (full-time equivalent) ................................................
88,573
72,265
55,577
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to customers (net) ...........................................................
Loans and advances to banks (net) ..................................................................
Trading assets, financial instruments designated at fair value, and
financial investments ...................................................................................
Total assets ......................................................................................................
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
For footnote, see page 130.
2007
US$m
101,852
39,861
64,381
228,112
17,560
150,233
At 31 December
2006
US$m
77,574
27,517
41,585
167,668
10,323
108,995
2005
US$m
70,016
19,559
30,348
142,014
7,439
89,118
Concerns over liquidity growth prompted the central
bank to increase interest rates by 50 basis points to
5 per cent during the year. A gradual cooling of
demand and concerns over rapid exchange rate
appreciation are expected to limit the scope for
further interest rate rises in 2008. Buoyant exports
supported economic growth in Taiwan, while
domestic demand remained lacklustre due to a lack
of government initiatives which is expected to
continue beyond the presidential and parliamentary
elections scheduled for 2008. Generally robust
economic performances in the Philippines, Thailand,
and Pakistan in 2007 were overshadowed to varying
degrees by political risks.
75
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2007
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
2006
as
reported
Rest of Asia-Pacific
US$m
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 ...
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ....
3,047
1,622
2,053
6,722
(512)
6,210
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
Dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
Reported
change
US$m
%
Underlying
change
%
140
58
108
306
(13)
293
3,187
1,680
2,161
7,028
(525)
6,503
–
–
1,081
1,081
956
566
410
4,143
2,246
3,652
1,932
10,041
–
(91)
(616)
1,081
1,841
9,425
Operating expenses ..........
(3,548)
(179)
(3,727)
–
(1,037)
(4,764)
Operating profit .............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax .............
2,662
865
3,527
114
25
139
2,776
890
3,666
1,081
–
804
458
1,081
1,262
4,661
1,348
6,009
For footnotes, see page 130.
36
38
78
49
(20)
52
(34)
75
56
70
30
34
19
27
(17)
28
(28)
29
51
34
Review of business performance
The commentary that follows is on an underlying
HSBC’s operations in Rest of Asia-Pacific reported
a pre-tax profit of US$6.0 billion compared with
US$3.5 billion in 2006, an increase of 71 per cent.
On an underlying basis, excluding dilution gains of
US$1.1 billion, profit before tax increased by
34 per cent, bolstered by sustained growth and
business expansion across the region.
In Global Banking and Markets, profit before tax
increased significantly, driven by an enhanced
product offering combined with buoyant local
markets. Commercial Banking revenue benefited
from increased customer volumes as a result of new
and enhanced banking services. In Personal Financial
Services, profit before tax rose as a result of strong
balance sheet growth and increased contributions
from associates. Private Banking delivered a solid
performance, underpinned by robust stock markets
and increasing wealth in the region.
HSBC’s three associates in mainland China,
Ping An Insurance, Bank of Communications and
Industrial Bank, all raised new capital in 2007 in the
‘A’ share market in Shanghai in which HSBC is not
able as a foreign investor to participate. A similar
dilution gain from Techcombank, in Vietnam, was
recorded in the second half of 2007. The resulting
dilution of the Group’s interests was considerably
less than its share of the new monies raised and
HSBC’s results therefore include within ‘Other’
aggregate pre-tax gains of US$1.1 billion which
should be regarded as exceptional.
basis.
Personal Financial Services reported a pre-tax
profit of US$760 million, an increase of 51 per cent
compared with 2006, due to significant growth in
operating income and in the contribution from
associates. Loan impairment charges declined
slightly with the absence of the exceptional credit
card losses incurred in Taiwan in 2006 largely offset
by new loan impairment charges from expansion in
consumer lending throughout the region. Continued
investment in the region’s emerging markets and in
Japan resulted in a slight deterioration in the cost
efficiency ratio.
Global and regional emphasis on distinctive
product offerings, including HSBC Premier and
HSBC Direct, as well as significant investment in
branches and marketing, and growth of consumer
assets in emerging markets, helped attract an
additional 1.1 million active customers, bringing the
total to over 9 million. 87 new branches in mainland
China, India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka,
Bangladesh and Malaysia expanded the total branch
network to 410. These initiatives spurred brisk
growth of the business, with double-digit revenue
growth in most countries in the region.
HSBC Premier was relaunched in 22 markets
in the region, extending international banking
connectivity to 35 countries globally. The number
of Premier customers within Rest of Asia-Pacific
increased by 37 per cent.
76
In mainland China, pre-tax profit grew by 71 per
cent, as the share of profit from associates made
significant progress. Operating income from own
branded operations increased, though operating profit
fell due to continuing investment expenditure in key
regions within mainland China. The Chinese
government’s Qualified Domestic Institutional
Investors (‘QDII’) scheme, which allows mainland
Chinese citizens to invest overseas, contributed to an
increase in net fee income. HSBC’s own-branded
network expanded to 18 branches and 44 sub-
branches and, following local incorporation, HSBC
began full renminbi-denominated services. HSBC
was the first foreign bank to qualify to provide local
currency services in Beijing. New branches were
added in the key economic zones of the Pearl River
Delta, the Yangtze River Delta and the Bohai Rim.
In addition, Hang Seng Bank added an additional
three branches and seven sub-branches, bringing its
total to 25 outlets. HSBC has the largest branch
network among foreign banks and remained focused
on offering Premier services. This led to significant
deposit growth and a 51 per cent rise in the total
number of customers.
In the Middle East, pre-tax profit grew strongly,
other than in Saudi Arabia, and in aggregate
increased by 4 per cent. Revenue growth across
the region was offset by a reduced contribution from
HSBC’s associate in Saudi Arabia, which resulted
from lower stock market-related income than the
exceptional levels in 2006. Balance sheet growth
continued in the UAE across core asset and liability
lines, with the latter also benefiting from improved
margins. Promotions were instrumental in raising
credit card balances as well as related interest income
and fees.
In Singapore, pre-tax profit increased by 33 per
cent, largely attributable to strong sales of unit trusts,
along with successful campaigns to increase credit
card usage and deposit balances. Average deposit
balances rose by 23 per cent compared with 2006.
In India, a pre-tax loss of US$70 million was
recorded due to planned investment in growing a
consumer finance business and higher loan
impairment charges. The personal lending portfolio,
excluding mortgages, grew by 67 per cent during
2007. Excellent growth in operating income was
achieved across all key products with 23 per cent
growth in the number of active customers to over
2.4 million. HSBC is among the market leaders in
India in new credit card issuance and retail mutual
funds distribution. The wealth management business
continued to perform strongly with a 91 per cent
increase in funds under management and the number
of insurance policies in force more then doubled. The
77
credit card business continued to expand while also
delivering operating income growth of 33 per cent.
In Malaysia, revenues grew robustly as strong
income growth was achieved in cards and personal
lending. HSBC also recorded significant deposit
growth, with balances 12 per cent higher than
last year.
In Indonesia, expansion of consumer finance and
development of the wealth management business
helped increase revenues which, with more moderate
loan impairment charges, resulted in an improvement
in profitability.
In Taiwan, a pre-tax loss of US$52 million was
70 per cent better than in 2006. Revenues and
expenses were in line with the previous year, while
loan impairment charges were lower due to the non-
recurrence of regulatory changes.
Net interest income of US$2.0 billion was
23 per cent higher, driven by strong growth across
the region, particularly in the Middle East, India,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, mainland
China, Singapore, Thailand and South Korea, due to
higher balances from personal lending, credit cards
and deposit accounts.
Average deposit balances rose by 23 per cent,
partly as a result of the global relaunch of HSBC
Premier and the addition of 136 dedicated Premier
outlets, which led to notable increases in Singapore,
mainland China, Malaysia, India and the Middle
East. In South Korea, Taiwan and the Middle East,
deposit growth was boosted by the successful launch
of HSBC Direct, the Group’s online savings offering,
which attracted more than 376,000 accounts with
total savings balances exceeding US$1.2 billion
at the end of 2007. An online savings product was
also launched in the Middle East. Deposit spreads
widened, particularly in India and Australia during
the first half of the year, as interest rates rose in much
of the region.
Average asset balances also increased and
spreads widened as the asset mix shifted towards
higher margin products. Personal lending grew by
3 per cent despite the sale of mortgage portfolios in
Australia in the second half of 2006 and in New
Zealand in July 2007. Excluding these countries,
personal lending grew by 8 per cent.
Cards in circulation rose to 8.9 million and
card balances were 23 per cent higher than in 2006.
Various promotional initiatives in the Middle East
contributed to a 30 per cent rise in card accounts and
a 62 per cent rise in balances, as card usage among
consumers increased. Balances rose in India and
Australia due to portfolio growth and, in the latter,
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2007
increased use of point-of-sale financing. By the
end of 2007, nearly 2.7 million credit cards were in
circulation in India and over 1.2 million cards in the
Middle East. In Malaysia, the Group is the third
largest card issuer. Spreads in the region improved
slightly due to lower funding costs.
The mortgage business in each market in
Asia-Pacific was affected to varying degrees by
competitive pressures on balances and margins,
and by local regulatory requirements. Excluding
Australia and New Zealand, which were affected by
the portfolio sales, mortgage balances grew by 7 per
cent. In the Middle East, mortgage balances more
than doubled.
Net fee income rose by 40 per cent to
US$766 million, with increases from most products,
notably cards and the wealth management businesses.
Increased sales of unit trusts and other
investment products across the region was a key
driver of higher fee income. Funds under
management rose by 57 per cent. In the Middle East,
retail sales benefited from the strong performance of
local markets (largely due to sustained higher oil
prices), and improved volumes of key products.
Strong investment sales were recorded in India,
South Korea, Singapore and mainland China, where
HSBC offered residents renminbi-denominated
products through its QDII offerings.
Credit card fee income increased, primarily in
the Middle East, India, the Philippines and Malaysia,
due to a combination of additional cards in
circulation, increased spending and higher balances.
Distribution capabilities for insurance products
were expanded through strategic alliances and the
addition of new branches. In addition, marketing
campaigns promoted HSBC’s expertise in life and
non-life products. As a result, insurance fees and new
premiums rose by 170 per cent and 50 per cent
respectively. The improved and extended sales
management in the Middle East, Taiwan and India
increased fees from the distribution of insurance
products.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions declined by 1 per cent. Loan impairment
charges were significantly lower in Taiwan due to the
non-recurrence of regulatory measures which, in
2006, had led to an increase in loan impairment
charges. In Indonesia, lower impairment charges
were a result of an improved economic environment
and continued collection efforts. The Middle East
businesses benefited from lower delinquencies and
better collections.
78
In India, higher loan impairment charges were
due to volume growth of the portfolio, along with a
change in the collection methods of staff and
agencies and regulatory restrictions on collections.
Loan impairment charges in Malaysia also increased.
In Thailand, loan impairment charges rose from a
previously low level, partly because of the one-off
effect of a regulatory increase during the year in the
minimum payment due on credit cards.
Ongoing expansion in the region led to increases
in headcount and performance-related staff costs,
particularly in mainland China and the Middle East,
which contributed to a 27 per cent increase in
operating expenses to US$2.1 billion. Staff numbers
rose from 750 to over 2,000 in mainland China,
primarily in new branches. In India, an additional
700 employees were added to drive business
expansion, bringing the total to over 4,600.
Additional staff in the Middle East were concentrated
in the UAE, where the number of employees
increased from nearly 1,200 to 1,500, reflecting
investment in the region.
Investment expenditure during 2007 was focused
on implementing new business initiatives in
consumer finance, HSBC Direct and expansion in
mainland China. In India, the consumer finance
branch network and the credit card business were
expanded. In Indonesia, HSBC added 36 consumer
finance loan centres. In mainland China, key cities
were identified for increased investment and a total
of 27 new branches and sub-branches were opened.
Income from HSBC’s strategic investments in its
associates increased by 45 per cent, predominantly
due to an increased contribution from Ping An
Insurance, which experienced steady growth in its
key business segments as well as improved
investment returns. In the Middle East, Saudi British
Bank’s performance was lower than in 2006, as the
local stock market did not reach the volume of
activity seen in that year.
Commercial Banking reported a profit before
tax of US$1.4 billion, 27 per cent higher than in
2006. The region’s economies performed strongly,
and this generated excellent trade and investment
flows. The launch of secure and enhanced online
banking services, and new International Banking
Centres established to support the increase in the
customer base, contributed to strengthened deposit
growth. Costs rose to fund investment in expansion
in mainland China and India, initiatives directed at
small and medium-sized businesses in selected
countries and additional employee numbers to
support this planned growth. The cost efficiency ratio
was largely in line with 2006.
In the Middle East, operating profit grew by
29 per cent, underpinned by strong economic growth
and the success of new International Banking Centres
and dedicated Business Banking Centres. Small-
business banking was introduced in Bahrain, Qatar
and Jordan. In the UAE, additional relationship
managers in the business banking unit helped to drive
a 30 per cent increase in revenues. The region
performed well, particularly in deposits and trade-
related lending.
Operating profit grew by 56 per cent in mainland
China to US$46 million, reflecting growing lending
volumes to mid-market customers and improved
spreads on lending products. Lending volume growth
resulted in part from increased cross-border activity,
new branches and additional front-line employees.
In Singapore, profit before tax rose by 19 per
cent, driven by higher net interest income from
balance sheet growth. Enhancements to the
receivables finance offering contributed to strong
growth in fee income.
mainland China, Malaysia, Vietnam and Mauritius,
spurring deposit and loan growth.
The UAE drove a strong increase in net interest
income in the Middle East. Deposits and lending
each recorded substantial volume growth as the
region continued to experience high levels of
investment and business expansion which buoyed
local economic activity. Trade flows in the region
also benefited small and medium-sized businesses
and their related deposits. Trade-related lending rose
by 45 per cent.
In India, net interest income grew by 78 per cent,
largely due to trade-related lending products in
combination with growth in deposits. Both lending
and deposits benefited from an increase in the
number of frontline sales staff in provincial cities.
Net interest income from small and medium-sized
businesses rose by 49 per cent. Increased margins on
current accounts reflected the higher interest rates in
the region. Local incorporation in Mauritius allowed
closer alignment with HSBC in India.
In India, profit before tax grew by 76 per cent.
In mainland China, net interest income rose by
Growth was broadly based with both net interest
income and net fee income registering healthy
increases of 78 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively.
Net interest income rose from wider asset spreads
and balance sheet growth, driven by selective lending
related to the booming Indian real estate sector.
Higher foreign exchange volumes and treasury
product sales drove growth in fee income.
Revenues in Malaysia rose by 9 per cent, again
due to strong balance sheet growth, further supported
by initiatives to grow deposit balances and
complemented by improved liability margins.
Lending rose, particularly due to corporate term
lending, but competition resulted in narrower
spreads. Results in 2006 benefited from net
recoveries on loan impairment charges which
did not recur.
Cross-border activity was facilitated in part
through the cross-border referral system, Global
Links, which was extended across most of the region.
Regional alignments and the acceleration of cross-
border activity led to an 87 per cent increase in
successful referrals. A further 19 International
Banking Centres were opened in 2007, taking the
coverage to 26 of the region’s countries and
territories.
Net interest income grew by 29 per cent to
US$1.1 billion. The opening of new branches, an
increased commercial presence supported by call
centres, and the enhancement of BIB in Asia-Pacific
contributed to customer acquisition, particularly in
79 per cent as the opening of new branches and
recruitment of additional frontline employees
succeeded in attracting new deposits and additional
sales of lending products. HSBC utilised country
desks to facilitate a greater number of cross-border
transactions with South Korea, Vietnam, Hong Kong
and Taiwan, which partly contributed to the 68 per
cent growth in commercial lending volumes. The
widening of liability spreads also contributed to net
interest income growth.
Net interest income also rose strongly in
Singapore and Malaysia, mainly due to higher
deposit balances. In Malaysia, improvements to
direct channels helped to generate increased balances
in current accounts, and spreads rose accordingly.
Growth in South Korea was partly the result of the
successful acquisition of new customers.
Net fee income increased by 26 per cent, largely
due to the continued growth of trade services,
particularly in the Middle East, and cross-border
transaction fees in India.
Trade-related lending fees rose by 24 per cent.
The majority of this increase arose in the Middle
East, where intra-regional trade flows increased as a
result of strong economic performance. In India,
customer acquisition of SME businesses, in
combination with higher volumes of transactions
from existing customers, increased trade-related
fees by 81 per cent. TradeSmart in Malaysia and
Tradeline in Bangladesh were among the initiatives
used to maintain HSBC’s reputation for providing
79
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2007 / 2006
strong support for small and medium-sized business
trade.
Fees generated from small and micro businesses
rose as the customer base increased, in part due to
customer acquisition campaigns, enhanced internet
banking capabilities and the acquisition of Chailease,
a factoring company in Taiwan which facilitates
cross-border transactions.
Trading income increased by 45 per cent, as
volatility among Asian currencies resulted in
increased business flows and higher volumes.
Volatile exchange rates also drove demand for
hedging products, leading to an improvement in
foreign exchange earnings, particularly in India and
Singapore. Additional volumes were driven by the
launch of an online trading platform. In the Middle
East, trading income rose due to higher demand from
customers for foreign exchange and interest rate
hedging products.
Loan impairment charges were US$61 million
compared with a net release in 2006. The charges
mainly arose in Thailand and Indonesia, largely due
to portfolio growth and a small number of delinquent
customer accounts. The overall increase in loan
impairment charges was balanced by recoveries in
the UAE, Singapore and Mauritius.
Total operating expenses grew by 28 per cent, as
growth was supplemented by investment in branch
expansion in India and mainland China, and small-
business initiatives in the Middle East. Additional
staff were recruited to support sales growth, business
initiatives and general expansion. In mainland China,
HSBC established a rural bank targeting micro
borrowers. Continued emphasis on the use of lower
cost delivery media resulted in a substantial rise in
the number of customers registered for BIB; the
number of transactions undertaken through internet
channels was 4 million, an increase of 127 per cent
compared with 2006.
Income from associates rose by 64 per cent.
Bank of Communications and Industrial Bank in
mainland China substantially increased their
contributions compared with 2006, largely due to
balance sheet growth.
Global Banking and Markets reported a record
pre-tax profit of US$2.5 billion in Rest of Asia-
Pacific, an increase of 44 per cent on 2006. Robust
growth across most revenue lines was driven by the
successful delivery of HSBC’s global products to
clients throughout the region, against a backdrop of
rapid growth in regional economies and continuing
international and domestic investor confidence in
local stock markets. In line with the strategy to build
80
an emerging markets-led and financing-focused
business, there were strong revenue performances in
Global Banking and Markets in India, mainland
China, the Middle East, Singapore and Malaysia,
which more than offset a 26 per cent increase in
operating expenses. The cost efficiency ratio
improved by 3.0 percentage points to 34.5 per cent.
Total operating income increased by 37 per cent
to US$3.3 billion with growth of over 20 per cent in
all major countries, led by securities services, balance
sheet management and foreign exchange trading.
Net interest income grew by 54 per cent,
reflecting balance sheet growth and improved
spreads compared with the first half of 2006. In an
environment of buoyant local markets and favourable
deposit spreads, payments and cash management and
balance sheet management reported notable increases
across the region, particularly in mainland China,
Singapore and India. In the Middle East, growth in
income was driven by higher liability balances and
improved spreads.
Net fee income rose by 34 per cent to
US$952 million with good performances throughout
the region in securities services, driven by a sustained
level of transaction volumes and investment flows.
In securities services, assets under custody increased
by 83 per cent, due to the successful transfer of
Westpac’s sub-custody clients in Australia and New
Zealand, and high market volumes, particularly in
India. Additionally, there was especially high fee
income in Singapore, particularly from financing and
capital markets, and payments and cash management.
HSBC Global Asset Management income grew
by 68 per cent, following continued success in
distributing emerging market funds to the Japanese
market and a second year of strong performance fees
from BRIC (‘Brazil, Russia, India and China’) funds
generating growth in Singapore.
A significant rise in trading income was mainly
due to record revenues from foreign exchange
trading, driven by increased customer flows as a
result of volatility in exchange rates against the
US dollar across the region. Rates trading also
contributed, benefiting from favourable market
conditions in most countries.
Operating expenses increased by 26 per cent,
mainly in the Middle East, Singapore, India and
mainland China. Increased technology and
infrastructure costs were incurred in support of
business expansion initiatives. Higher staff costs
reflected increases in employee numbers and
performance-related pay in response to robust
growth in operating income.
The share of profits in associates and joint
ventures increased by 47 per cent, reflecting higher
contributions from HSBC’s investments in Bank of
Communication, Industrial Bank and Ping An
Insurance, largely due to balance sheet growth.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit of
US$92 million, an increase of 15 per cent. Strong
revenue growth was achieved in Singapore, with
further improvements in Japan, underpinned by
buoyant stock markets and rapidly expanding wealth
across the region. However, this was offset by
increases in operating expenses, with the result that
the cost efficiency ratio worsened by 2.8 percentage
points to 57.6 per cent.
Net interest income rose by 71 per cent to
US$60 million, mainly due to increased lending
volumes in Singapore and improved treasury
performance, as US dollar and Hong Kong dollar
interest rates declined.
In Singapore, increased client appetite for
discretionary portfolios and the SIS multi-manager
product contributed to the 23 per cent increase in net
fee income.
Trading income marginally decreased, with
increased demand for structured products being
offset by higher funding costs.
Client assets grew by 21 per cent to
US$20.3 billion, with strong growth in Singapore
and Japan. Net new money of US$2.2 billion was
mainly attributable to the recruitment of additional
relationship managers and a wider range of
discretionary products.
Operating expenses were up by 29 per cent to
US$125 million. The majority of the rise was in
Singapore, as a result of increased employee
numbers, particularly in the front office, and
alignment of salaries to market conditions to support
future growth. Also contributing to the rise were
operating expenses in India, which more than
doubled as HSBC continued to build its Private
Banking business there.
In Other, GSC activity increased substantially as
the number of countries using service centres rose to
31 from 24 in 2006. Costs rose by 40 per cent to
US$790 million following the opening of six new
GSCs and the resultant increase in staff and
administrative costs, all of which were recovered
in the form of other operating income from HSBC’s
customer groups.
81
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Economic briefing
Mainland China’s economy continued to grow
strongly, with GDP rising by 10.7 per cent in 2006,
the fourth consecutive year of double-digit growth.
Despite the government’s stated intention of
promoting consumption in favour of investment
growth, economic performance remained primarily
dependent on investment and exports. However,
some success was achieved in this respect, as urban
fixed-asset investment slowed significantly to about
22 per cent in the second half of 2006 from 31 per
cent in the first half of the year. This resulted from a
combination of measures, including several interest
rate rises, increases in banks’ required reserve ratios,
and the draining of liquidity via bill sales and
‘window guidance’, the exercise of influence by the
authorities over the banks on policy matters, such as
slowing lending growth.
Export growth remained strong, accelerating
slightly during the second half of 2006 despite
evidence of slower global growth. Although a
slowdown in the US growth rate in 2007 could
negatively affect mainland China’s exports, the
slowdown in investment spending referred to above
provides the authorities with the scope to ease policy
and stimulate domestic spending if exports falter.
Consumer spending rose steadily in 2006 with retail
sales rising by about 13 per cent, and bank loans
continued to grow rapidly. The inflationary
environment remained benign, with consumer prices
rising by less than 2 per cent. Mainland China’s
foreign exchange reserves rose to above
US$1 trillion, the world’s highest level. The currency
appreciated gradually against the US dollar, with an
increase of over 3 per cent in 2006.
Japan’s economy, the largest in the region, grew
in 2006. Export growth was steady despite a slight
slowing in the second half of the year, and private
capital investment remained firm, driven by record
levels of corporate profits and the need to upgrade
the capital stock to maintain global competitiveness.
Consumer spending was disappointing, however, and
was the major reason why GDP growth was less than
expected. Core consumer prices generally rose.
Economic growth in the Middle East remained
robust over the second half of the year, continuing a
strong expansionary phase that HSBC estimates will
result in GDP in the Gulf region doubling in the
space of just four years. Buoyed by high oil prices
and strong production, earnings from energy reached
record highs in 2006. Strong revenue growth
encouraged government spending across the region,
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2006
particularly on capital projects. Private investment,
from both domestic and foreign sources, was also
high while abundant liquidity, rising employment and
rapid population growth supported further increases
in private consumption. Although interest rates rose,
tracking those in the US over the course of the year,
credit growth continued to be strong. Robust
domestic demand and the weakness of the US dollar
boosted inflationary pressures. Following corrections
in the first half of 2006, the major regional stock
exchange indices continued to trade at significant
discounts to the record levels registered in late 2005,
with markets remaining generally sluggish.
Elsewhere in the region, most economies
continued to perform impressively, particularly India,
Singapore and Vietnam. The main drivers of growth
were exports, demand for technology, and domestic
consumption, with investment demand lagging
behind. India was among the strongest performing
economies in the world, with GDP growth of about
9 per cent in 2006. This led to some signs of
overheating, with inflation rising during the year. The
Reserve Bank of India responded by raising interest
rates, and there may be more increases to come. GDP
in Singapore grew by 8 per cent in 2006, in Vietnam
by over 7 per cent and in Malaysia by approximately
6 per cent, their economies benefiting from generally
low inflation and strong domestic and external
demand. Most Asian currencies ended 2006 stronger
than the US dollar. A US slowdown is a risk for the
region.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 .....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses ..........
Operating profit ...............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
2,412
1,340
1,265
5,017
(134)
4,883
(2,762)
2,121
453
2,574
30
1
21
52
(3)
49
(22)
27
4
31
2,442
1,341
1,286
5,069
(137)
4,932
(2,784)
2,148
457
2,605
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
159
159
Reported
change
%
26
21
62
34
Underlying
change
%
25
21
60
33
605
281
767
1,653
3,047
1,622
2,053
6,722
(375)
(512)
(282)
(274)
1,278
6,210
(764)
(3,548)
514
249
763
2,662
865
3,527
27
(28)
26
91
37
26
(27)
24
54
29
Review of business performance
HSBC’s operations in Rest of Asia-Pacific delivered
a pre-tax profit of US$3.5 billion compared with
US$2.6 billion in 2005, an increase of 37 per cent.
On an underlying basis, pre-tax profits grew by
29 per cent, with the major change in composition of
the Group being the additional 10 per cent stake
purchased in Ping An Insurance in August 2005
which made that company a 19.9 per cent owned
associate of HSBC.
Pre-tax profits in the region have nearly doubled
in the past two years, justifying HSBC’s strategy of
investing in emerging markets. Momentum in 2006
was strong, with underlying net operating income
increasing by 26 per cent, notwithstanding a
significant rise in loan impairment charges arising
primarily from industry-wide credit deterioration in
the credit card portfolio in Taiwan, mainly in the first
half of 2006. Significant increases in total operating
income and pre-tax profits were reported in the
Middle East, India, Singapore and Malaysia. In
Taiwan, HSBC launched the direct savings
proposition which had been received very positively
in the US. HSBC’s strategic investments in mainland
China, Bank of Communications and Industrial
Bank, contributed to a 54 per cent underlying
increase in income from associates.
The commentary that follows is on an underlying
basis.
82
Personal Financial Services reported a pre-tax
profit of US$477 million, 16 per cent lower than in
2005. Strong operating trends were masked by a
US$160 million rise in loan impairment charges in
Taiwan, which suffered from regulatory changes
introduced to address high levels of consumer
indebtedness. Pre-provision operating income
increased by 29 per cent, driven by balance sheet
growth, wider deposit spreads and increased fee
income. Income growth was supported by business
development activity which contributed to a 26 per
cent increase in operating costs. The cost efficiency
ratio improved by 1.3 percentage points.
The development of HSBC’s regional business
continued apace, and double digit profit growth
was achieved in 5 sites, namely the Middle East,
mainland China, Malaysia, Singapore and the
Philippines. Customer numbers increased by
1.5 million, or 21 per cent, to 8.9 million, through
strong growth in the credit card business, increased
marketing activity and expansion of the sales force.
36 new branches and 28 consumer loan centres were
opened in 13 countries, most notably Indonesia,
mainland China and the Middle East, and at the end
of 2006, HSBC had 396 branches in Rest of Asia-
Pacific region and 7.3 million cards in issue.
Net interest income increased by 24 per cent to
US$1.6 billion. Average asset and liability balances
grew strongly, while interest rate rises contributed to
a 31 basis point widening of deposit spreads. Asset
spreads were in line with 2005.
Average deposit balances rose by 16 per cent to
US$34.4 billion, principally due to growth in the
HSBC Premier customer base. Development of the
Premier business was supported by a concerted
customer acquisition campaign which included
regional and local advertising and the establishment
of new, dedicated Premier centres. Overall deposit
balance growth was especially strong in Singapore,
the Middle East and mainland China. In Singapore,
promotional campaigns, which included a deposit
product sale, contributed to a 23 per cent increase in
liability balances while, in the Middle East, HSBC
ran a deposit raising campaign with new product
launches, marketing and internal sales incentives,
leading to a 20 per cent rise in average deposit
balances. In mainland China, growth in HSBC
Premier, which accompanied the opening of 12 new
Premier sub-branches, contributed to higher deposit
balances.
Average loans and advances to customers rose
by 16 per cent, driven by higher credit card advances
and increased mortgage balances. Average card
balances increased by 22 per cent to US$3.1 billion,
83
reflecting higher cardholder spending and a 21 per
cent increase in cards in circulation. Over 2.5 million
cards were issued during 2006, with new products
launched in the Middle East, Sri Lanka and
Singapore. HSBC ran marketing and incentive
campaigns in a number of countries and card
balances rose substantially in Malaysia, the Middle
East, Indonesia, India and the Philippines.
Average mortgage balances increased by
13 per cent to US$18.9 billion, reflecting robust
growth in Singapore, Taiwan, India and Malaysia. In
Singapore, HSBC used targeted promotional rates to
build market share and this, together with increased
marketing activity, contributed to a 25 per cent
increase in mortgage balances. In Taiwan,
competitive pricing and customer retention initiatives
contributed to a rise in customer numbers and
resulted in a 22 per cent increase in average mortgage
balances. In India, mortgage balances rose by 27 per
cent, benefiting from increased marketing and direct
sales efforts, while in Malaysia, the successful
promotion of Homesmart, a flexible offset mortgage
product, enabled HSBC to increase average mortgage
balances by 10 per cent and widen spreads in a
highly competitive market.
Personal lending balances increased by
22 per cent, partly as a result of significant growth
in HSBC’s consumer finance business in India,
Australia and Indonesia. In Indonesia, HSBC opened
28 dedicated consumer finance outlets while, in
India, 25 new outlets were opened in branches. In
Australia, consumer finance was developed in
partnership with well known international retailers
such as IKEA and Bang & Olufsen, together with
established local retailers including Clive Peeters
and Bing Lee. HSBC signed a number of exclusive
supplier agreements with retailers and, as a result, the
number of retail distribution outlets grew to more
than 1,100, which enabled HSBC to increase its
market share. In Malaysia, the success of HSBC’s
instalment loan product, Anytime Money, which was
relaunched in 2005, contributed to a 93 per cent rise
in average personal lending balances. In the Middle
East, HSBC focused on promoting a select portfolio
of products following a product simplification
exercise instigated in the fourth quarter of 2005
which led to a 22 per cent rise in personal lending
balances. Investments in HSBC’s South Korean
operations had immediate results and personal
lending balances more than doubled.
Net fee income rose by 24 per cent to
US$524 million. Regional card fees were 30 per cent
higher, reflecting solid growth in cardholder
spending while, in Indonesia, higher card fee income
was a consequence of a rise in delinquencies.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2006
The robust performance of regional stock
markets during 2006 contributed to strong demand
for investment products and led to the launch of new
investment funds, which together generated a 27 per
cent increase in investment fee income, including
custody and broking fees. Growth was particularly
strong in South Korea, Taiwan, India and Singapore.
Sales of investment products, including unit trusts,
bonds and structured products, increased by 19 per
cent to US$8.0 billion and funds under management
grew by 19 per cent to US$8.6 billion.
HSBC continued to develop its regional
insurance business by launching medical insurance in
Singapore and establishing a Takaful joint venture in
Malaysia, offering shariah-compliant insurance
products. In the Middle East, cardholder credit
insurance was launched in the fourth quarter of
2006. These product launches were supported by
increased marketing activity and targeted investment
to increase HSBC’s presence and market share.
Consequently, the number of policies in force at the
end of 2006 rose by 89 per cent to 800,000 and
insurance fee income and insurance premiums rose
by 12 per cent and 4 per cent respectively.
Other operating income increased by
US$71 million due to gains on the sale of HSBC’s
Australian stockbroking, margin lending and
mortgage broker businesses. Additionally, HSBC
established a joint venture with Global Payments Inc.
to manage the majority of the bank’s Asian card
acquiring business. This was transferred to the
joint venture in July 2006, realising a gain of
US$10 million in the region’s Personal Financial
Services business.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions more than doubled to US$545 million,
mainly due to higher charges for personal lending in
Taiwan and Indonesia. In Taiwan, regulatory changes
restricted collection activities and eased repayment
terms for delinquent borrowers. These changes,
coupled with a deteriorating credit environment, led
to a US$160 million increase in loan impairment
charges related mainly to the credit card portfolio,
most of which were realised in the first half of 2006.
In Indonesia, changes in minimum repayment
amounts, along with hardship following a significant
reduction in the government subsidy of fuel prices,
led to increased delinquency rates on credit cards,
also mainly in the first half of 2006. Elsewhere in the
region, credit quality was broadly stable and growth
in impairment charges followed increases in credit
card and personal lending balances.
Operating expenses increased by 26 per cent to
US$1.6 billion, largely tracking revenue growth.
84
Expansion of the branch network and development of
sales and support functions led to higher staff
numbers and, together with higher performance-
related incentive payments, contributed to a rise in
staff costs. The new branch openings increased
premises and equipment costs. The establishment of
a number of consumer finance businesses and HSBC
Direct’s introduction in Taiwan were also factors in
the rise of operating expenses.
Marketing costs rose as HSBC increased
advertising and promotional activity directed to
attracting new customers, enlarging HSBC’s share of
the credit card, mortgage and unsecured personal
lending markets and increasing deposit balances. In
the Middle East, IT expenditure rose as HSBC
introduced a new internet banking infrastructure,
implemented HSBC’s WHIRL credit card system
and made major updates to customer relationship
management software.
Largely driven by a strong performance in
HSBC’s strategic investment in Ping An Insurance,
which reported record results in 2006, income from
associates rose by 59 per cent. In Saudi Arabia there
were buoyant revenues from stock trading and
investment business, particularly in the first half of
2006 although, subsequently, turbulent local stock
markets affected investor sentiment and contributed
to lower income in the second half of the year.
Commercial Banking reported a pre-tax
profit of US$1.0 billion, 25 per cent higher than in
2005. Pre-provision operating income increased by
25 per cent, driven by higher deposit and lending
balances and widening liability spreads. The
migration of routine activities to lower-cost channels
helped to mitigate business expansion costs, and
operating expenses consequently increased by 21 per
cent. The cost efficiency ratio improved by
1.4 percentage points.
During 2006, HSBC focused on developing its
cross-border business banking activities and
increasing its presence in the small business market,
supported by investment in delivery channels and
increased promotional activity. International business
banking benefited from the strong performance of
HSBC’s two regional alignment programmes,
centred on mainland China and the Middle East,
together with the establishment of International
Business Centres in seven sites including Australia,
mainland China, India and Taiwan. In addition, new
branches in mainland China, India, Malaysia,
Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were complemented by
enhancements to internet banking services in
Malaysia and India and improved self-service
terminals in a number of countries. The launch of
HSBC’s inaugural global Commercial Banking
advertising campaign, increased local marketing
activity and the realisation of business development
teams throughout the Asia-Pacific region contributed
to an 8 per cent increase in Commercial Banking
customer numbers to 177,000, with particularly
strong growth in Malaysia, mainland China and
India.
Net interest income rose by 33 per cent to
US$848 million. Higher customer numbers
contributed to increased average asset and liability
balances, while interest rate rises led to wider
liability spreads, partly offset by narrower asset
spreads.
Interest rate rises also contributed to higher
demand for deposit products and liability balances
increased in a number of countries, most notably the
Middle East, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia and India.
In the Middle East, HSBC successfully initiated a
targeted marketing campaign offering preferential
savings rates to selected customers while, in
Singapore and Taiwan, enhanced sales incentives
contributed to growth in liability balances. In
Malaysia, expansion of the branch network together
with fresh marketing campaigns, competitive pricing
and product enhancements increased customer
numbers and led to a 31 per cent rise in average
liability balances. In India, current account and
deposit balances increased by 40 per cent, partly
from liquidity chasing new IPOs, which surged in
line with strong local equity markets.
In 2006, HSBC successfully launched a number
of initiatives designed to increase asset balances
throughout the Rest of Asia-Pacific region to deploy
the additional deposit base being attracted. For
example, in Malaysia, television and press
advertising helped trigger a 31 per cent increase in
average non-trade lending balances. Trade and Save
marketing campaigns launched in Malaysia and India
in the wake of higher regional trade flows, offered
customer incentives designed to expand HSBC’s
market share in trade lending. Targeted incentive
programmes were also launched in Singapore, Sri
Lanka, mainland China, South Korea and Indonesia.
In the Middle East, strong demand for credit
underpinned by robust economic expansion resulted
in a 26 per cent rise in average lending balances.
Net fee income rose by 7 per cent to
US$330 million as volume-related increases in trade
fees were recorded in the Middle East and India.
HSBC in India also benefited from higher fees from
lending activities, reflecting growth in the number of
borrowing customers, while payments and cash
management fee income rose in the Middle East.
85
Trading income increased by 25 per cent. In the
Middle East, HSBC continued to invest in its
Commercial Banking treasury business to support
an increasingly international customer base. As
customer demands became more sophisticated,
15 new products were launched in 2006, while higher
marketing activity and the establishment of an online
e-trading platform also contributed to a rise in
customer trading volumes. Increased hedging activity
among Commercial Banking customers also led to
increased foreign exchange earnings in India and
Malaysia.
The transfer of the majority of HSBC’s Asian
card acquiring business into a joint venture with
Global Payments Inc. led to the recognition of a gain
of US$10 million in Commercial Banking, reported
in ‘Other operating income’.
Strong economic conditions supported a further
net release of loan impairment charges, which
decreased by 57 per cent compared with 2005.
Underlying credit quality remained strong.
Operating expenses increased by 21 per cent to
US$554 million in support of business expansion.
HSBC recruited additional sales and support staff,
increased its Commercial Banking presence in the
branch network and committed to higher marketing
activity in a number of countries, most notably the
Middle East, India and mainland China. Strong
revenue growth resulted in higher performance
payments and this, together with salary inflation,
added to rising staff costs. In South Korea, the
Commercial Banking business expansion proceeded
as planned, staff numbers more than doubled, and
HSBC incurred higher premises, equipment and
infrastructure costs as a consequence. In the Middle
East, increased business volumes necessitated
systems improvements which resulted in higher IT
costs.
Income from HSBC’s strategic investments in
associates increased by 47 per cent. Income from
Bank of Communications rose by 45 per cent as a
result of higher asset and liability balances, effective
credit control and improvements in the cost
efficiency ratio, while income from Industrial Bank
was 55 per cent higher. In the Middle East, net
releases of loan impairments, following net charges
in 2005, led to strong growth in Commercial Banking
income in The Saudi British Bank.
Global Banking and Markets delivered a
record pre-tax profit of US$1.6 billion, an increase of
35 per cent compared with 2005. Positive revenue
trends were reported across most countries, reflecting
continued growth in HSBC’s wholesale banking
businesses in emerging markets. The Middle East,
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > 2006
India, Taiwan and Singapore accounted for 66 per
cent of the increase in pre-tax profits. The cost
efficiency ratio improved by 3.5 percentage points to
37.6 per cent.
Total operating income increased by 29 per cent
compared with 2005 to US$2.3 billion. In Global
Markets, the securities services business benefited
from investment flows into and within emerging
markets, leading to higher customer volumes in
buoyant local markets.
In Global Banking, payments and cash
management services increased in all countries, with
significant contributions from businesses in India, the
Middle East, Singapore and mainland China reflected
in higher net interest income. The strength of
domestic economies within emerging markets,
coupled with the global trend of rising interest rates,
drove deposit balances and improvements in spreads.
Corporate lending income in the Middle East
increased by 33 per cent as economic growth
continued and infrastructure investment rose. These
gains were partly offset by lower balance sheet
management revenues.
Net fee income increased by 38 per cent to
US$688 million. A significant increase in fee income
in Global Markets was driven by higher securities
services business volumes, reflecting improved
investment sentiment and buoyant local markets,
particularly in early 2006. Debt underwriting
volumes increased, particularly in the Middle East, as
lower credit spreads encouraged issuers to lock into
the favourable credit environment by extending the
term of finance or raising new debt in local markets.
In Global Banking, income from the advisory
business was boosted by a steady flow of new deals,
driven by the strong momentum provided by
economic development in the Middle East. Trade
finance and payments and cash management fee
income also benefited from higher customer
volumes.
HSBC Global Asset Management revenues more
than doubled, reflecting higher funds under
management and performance fees on emerging
market funds.
Net trading income of US$717 million rose by
26 per cent, benefiting from an increasing interest
rate environment and volatile foreign exchange
markets. Although, generally, volatility levels were
lower than those experienced in 2005, the emerging
market correction in May 2006 combined with a
rapid recovery in the second half of the year to
stimulate a rise in foreign exchange and Credit and
Rates volumes in most countries. HSBC also
86
benefited from higher foreign investment flows as
investor confidence in the improved stability of
emerging economies grew. In the second half of
2006, growth in revenues from retail structured
investment products moderated as investors sought
outright exposure to equities, and deposit yields
improved. However, in the Middle East, there was
strong demand for structured interest rate products
among corporate and institutional customers and for
risk management advisory products as clients
continued to hedge exposures.
Gains on the disposal of financial investments
were higher than in 2005, largely due to income from
the sale of debt securities in the Philippines in 2006,
together with the non-recurrence of losses on the
disposal of US dollar securities in Japan in January
2005.
The net recovery in loan impairment charges
declined significantly due to the non-recurrence of a
large recovery in Malaysia in 2005.
Operating expenses increased by 18 per cent to
US$869 million, in part due to an increase in
performance-related incentives which reflected the
robust growth in operating income. In the Middle
East and India, higher staff costs also arose from
additional recruitment to support the expansion of
capabilities across various businesses.
In Global Markets, support costs increased in
line with higher transaction volumes and greater
product complexity, while a rise in payments and
cash management activity, primarily in HSBC’s
operations in India, mainland China, Singapore,
South Korea and Indonesia, resulted in higher
operational expense.
The share of profits in associates increased by
47 per cent, primarily reflecting higher contributions
from HSBC’s investments in Bank of
Communications in mainland China and The
Saudi British Bank.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit of
US$80 million, a modest increase compared with
2005. Revenue growth was strong across the region
despite challenging market conditions, particularly in
Singapore, with notable contributions from the
onshore Private Banking operations launched in the
Middle East and India during 2005. Employee
benefits rose at a faster rate than revenue, driven by
a fiercely competitive market for experienced private
banking staff, and this led to a deterioration of the
cost efficiency ratio from 50.7 per cent in 2005 to
54.5 per cent in 2006.
Net interest income grew by 21 per cent to
US$35 million. Growth was predominantly in
Singapore, where treasury performance improved and
unfavourable positions unwound, and India, where
the recently launched business was successful in
attracting deposits.
Fee income increased by 62 per cent to
US$68 million, with significant growth in Singapore,
India and the Middle East. Initiatives to attract clients
to HSBC’s suite of discretionary managed products,
particularly the SIS and CIS products, proved
successful.
Trading and other operating income was slightly
lower than in 2005, due to sluggish stock market
performance and correspondingly subdued client
activity.
Client assets increased by 12 per cent to
US$16 billion, benefiting from the recruitment of
front office staff, client appetite for investment in
newly launched funds and the successful growth of
recently launched onshore businesses in the region.
Investment in funds benefited from higher demand
for HSBC and third party manager funds, including
the SIS and CIS products in which the value of client
investments grew to US$291 million. Higher deposits
and investments in equities also contributed to the
growth in client assets.
Operating expenses increased by 25 per cent,
reflecting continued investment in the onshore
Japanese operations and growth of the business in
India. Staff costs rose as competition for front-office
professionals intensified, putting upward pressure on
staff rewards, and the full-year impact of the
expansion in staff recruitment in 2005 fed through.
HSBC sold properties in Japan and India,
realising gains of US$87 million in Other,
US$77 million higher than in 2005. Costs and
recoveries in the GSCs both rose, reflecting increased
activity supported by higher staff numbers. Interest
rate rises and higher retained earnings led to a
doubling of earnings on centrally held funds.
87
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > Profit before tax by customer group
Profit before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business
Rest of Asia-Pacific (including
the Middle East)
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Gains arising from dilution of
interests in associates .............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income/
(expense) ................................
Total operating income ............
Net insurance claims6 ..................
Net operating income4 ..............
Loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions .....
Net operating income ...............
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
1,965
766
72
(2)
70
73
5
–
–
209
40
3,128
(246)
2,882
(552)
2,330
Total operating expenses ............
(2,131)
Operating profit ........................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
199
561
760
%
3.1
73.9
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
1,131
429
129
–
129
4
4
–
–
16
15
1,728
(7)
1,721
(61)
1,660
(739)
921
429
1,350
%
5.6
42.9
1,295
952
1,000
(22)
978
(3)
28
–
2
–
53
3,305
–
3,305
(3)
3,302
(1,140)
2,162
302
2,464
%
10.2
34.5
60
85
71
–
71
(1)
–
–
–
–
2
217
–
217
–
217
(125)
92
–
92
%
0.4
57.6
153
14
(70)
4
(66)
38
1
1,081
6
1
849
2,077
–
(461)
–
–
461
461
–
–
–
–
–
(161)
(161)
–
–
(161)
161
–
–
–
–
2,077
(790)
1,287
56
1,343
%
5.5
38.0
2,077
(161)
10,041
Total
US$m
4,143
2,246
1,202
441
1,643
111
38
1,081
8
226
798
10,294
(253)
(616)
9,425
(4,764)
4,661
1,348
6,009
%
24.8
47.4
US$m
101,852
228,112
150,233
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
34,486
40,092
49,703
32,159
37,215
34,891
32,106
133,814
54,120
2,955
7,561
11,116
146
9,430
403
30,853
59,222
17,174
88
Rest of Asia-Pacific (including
the Middle East)
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
1,520
524
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income on trading
activities ..................................
Net trading income5 ....................
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 ..................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other
credit risk provisions ..............
Net operating income .................
61
–
61
59
2
–
148
108
2,422
(180)
2,242
(545)
1,697
Total operating expenses ............
(1,593)
Operating profit ..........................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ..........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
104
373
477
%
2.2
71.1
848
330
86
–
86
4
2
–
26
20
1,316
(11)
1,305
29
1,334
(554)
780
254
1,034
%
4.7
42.5
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
802
688
717
–
717
4
38
1
–
61
2,311
–
2,311
5
2,316
(869)
1,447
202
1,649
%
7.5
37.6
35
68
74
–
74
–
(1)
–
–
–
176
–
176
–
176
(96)
80
–
80
%
0.4
54.5
(219)
–
–
219
219
–
–
–
–
(91)
(91)
–
(91)
–
(91)
91
–
–
–
61
12
(3)
27
24
12
–
4
–
667
780
(1)
779
(1)
778
(527)
251
36
287
%
1.2
67.7
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
Total
US$m
3,047
1,622
935
246
1,181
79
41
5
174
765
6,914
(192)
6,722
(512)
6,210
(3,548)
2,662
865
3,527
%
16.0
52.8
US$m
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
28,911
35,317
38,557
21,912
26,335
24,228
24,311
93,605
36,623
2,313
6,476
8,929
127
5,935
658
77,574
167,668
108,995
22,171
36,580
9,849
89
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific > Profit before tax by customer group / North America
Profit before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business (continued)
Rest of Asia-Pacific (including
the Middle East)
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
1,208
419
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from
financial investments ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 ..................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other
credit risk provisions ..............
Net operating income .................
37
1
38
44
–
–
134
37
1,880
(157)
1,723
(236)
1,487
Total operating expenses ............
(1,245)
Operating profit ..........................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ..........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
242
135
377
%
1.8
72.3
631
307
70
(1)
69
1
4
–
21
9
1,042
(9)
1,033
67
1,100
(452)
648
170
818
%
3.9
43.8
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
614
498
579
(21)
558
4
12
1
–
82
1,769
–
1,769
35
1,804
(733)
1,071
136
1,207
%
5.8
41.4
30
43
74
–
74
–
2
–
–
4
153
–
153
2
155
(77)
78
–
78
%
0.4
50.3
(125)
–
–
125
125
–
–
–
–
(84)
(84)
–
(84)
–
(84)
84
–
–
–
54
73
(7)
3
(4)
9
–
4
–
287
423
–
423
(2)
421
(339)
82
12
94
%
0.4
80.1
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
Total
US$m
2,412
1,340
753
107
860
58
18
5
155
335
5,183
(166)
5,017
(134)
4,883
(2,762)
2,121
453
2,574
%
12.3
55.1
US$m
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant to
Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
27,433
32,224
31,250
18,694
22,570
18,612
21,431
76,026
32,102
2,347
5,359
7,092
111
5,835
62
70,016
142,014
89,118
15,352
26,113
7,041
90
North America
Profit/(loss) before tax by country within customer groups and global businesses
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
Year ended 31 December 2007
United States .....................................................
Canada ..............................................................
Bermuda ............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year ended 31 December 2006
United States .....................................................
Canada ..............................................................
Bermuda ............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year ended 31 December 2005
United States .....................................................
Canada ..............................................................
Bermuda ............................................................
Other .................................................................
(1,824)
265
13
–
(1,546)
3,128
253
10
–
3,391
3,853
310
18
–
4,181
377
466
77
–
920
442
437
78
–
957
447
403
42
–
892
(1,243)
239
39
–
(965)
199
189
31
4
423
373
154
43
3
573
156
8
10
–
174
107
–
7
–
114
104
–
–
–
104
1,468
5
34
1
1,508
(264)
17
29
1
(217)
158
(12)
19
–
165
Loans and advances to customers (net) by country
United States ....................................................................................................
Canada .............................................................................................................
Bermuda ...........................................................................................................
Customer accounts by country
United States ....................................................................................................
Canada .............................................................................................................
Bermuda ...........................................................................................................
2007
US$m
233,706
53,891
2,263
289,860
2007
US$m
100,034
37,061
8,078
145,173
At 31 December
2006
US$m
236,188
39,584
2,215
277,987
At 31 December
2006
US$m
84,560
28,668
7,694
120,922
(1,066)
983
173
1
91
3,612
896
155
5
4,668
4,935
855
122
3
5,915
2005
US$m
216,078
34,453
2,033
252,564
2005
US$m
76,786
25,643
8,957
111,386
91
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > Profit before tax / 2007
Profit before tax
North America
Net interest income ..........................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Net trading income/(expense) .........................................................................
Net income/(expense) from financial instruments designated at fair value ...
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Dividend income ..............................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
Total operating income .................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders..
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions .................................................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .............................
Net operating income ....................................................................................
Total operating expenses .................................................................................
Operating profit .............................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...............................................
Profit before tax .............................................................................................
Share of HSBC’s profit before tax ..................................................................
Cost efficiency ratio ........................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
14,847
5,810
(542)
1,750
245
105
449
360
23,024
(241)
22,783
(12,156)
10,627
(10,556)
71
20
91
%
0.4
46.3
2006
US$m
14,268
4,766
1,358
(63)
58
85
492
922
21,886
(259)
21,627
(6,796)
14,831
(10,193)
4,638
30
4,668
%
21.1
47.1
2005
US$m
13,295
3,952
885
434
47
41
477
642
19,773
(232)
19,541
(4,916)
14,625
(8,758)
5,867
48
5,915
%
28.2
44.8
Year-end staff numbers (full-time equivalent) ................................................
52,722
55,642
53,608
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to customers (net) ...........................................................
Loans and advances to banks (net) ..................................................................
Trading assets, financial instruments designated at fair value, and
financial investments16 ................................................................................
Total assets ......................................................................................................
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
For footnotes, see page 130.
2007
US$m
289,860
16,566
133,998
510,092
16,618
145,173
At 31 December
2006
US$m
277,987
17,865
145,700
511,190
11,484
120,922
2005
US$m
252,560
10,331
112,225
432,490
7,780
111,386
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Economic briefing
In the US, GDP growth in 2007 was 2.2 per cent,
0.7 percentage points less than that recorded in 2006
as the housing-led downturn gathered pace.
Consumer spending in 2007 grew by 2.9 per cent,
the weakest annual expansion since 2003. Housing
activity continued to weaken in 2007, with
residential investment falling by 17 per cent during
the year. Both new and existing home sales also
declined to new lows in 2007. The unemployment
rate averaged 4.6 per cent in 2007, with the average
in the second half of the year slightly higher at
4.8 per cent. The trade deficit narrowed in 2007 as
export growth strengthened. Consumer price
inflation averaged around 4 per cent in the final
quarter of 2007. This was largely due to higher
energy prices; excluding food and energy, consumer
price inflation averaged 2.3 per cent in the fourth
quarter. The Federal Reserve lowered short-term
interest rates by 100 basis points in the second half
of 2007, from 5.25 per cent to 4.25 per cent, as
policymakers attempted to mitigate the worst effects
of the sub-prime related credit squeeze upon
economic activity. 10-year note yields reached a
high of 5.3 per cent in June 2007, before falling to
92
4 per cent by the year-end. Declines in the final
months of 2007 left the Standard & Poor’s S&P500
stock market index practically unchanged compared
with the end of 2006.
Canadian GDP increased by 2.4 per cent during
the first eleven months of 2007 compared with the
equivalent period of 2006. Domestic demand
remained strong despite tighter credit conditions in
the latter part of the year, supported by the robust
labour market. The unemployment rate averaged
6 per cent for the year, reaching a historical low of
5.8 per cent in October. After hitting a high of
2.5 per cent in April, core consumer price inflation
slowed to 1.5 per cent by the end of 2007. The
Canadian dollar appreciated during the year,
particularly in the second half. In July, the Bank of
Canada raised its overnight interest rate from
4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent before reversing this
move in the final weeks of 2007.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
US$m
North America
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 ….
14,268
4,766
2,593
21,627
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ....
(6,796)
14,831
65
26
10
101
(3)
98
14,333
4,792
2,603
21,728
(6,799)
14,929
Operating expenses ..........
(10,193)
(47)
(10,240)
Operating profit .............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax .............
4,638
30
4,668
51
1
52
4,689
31
4,720
–
–
20
20
–
20
(26)
(6)
–
(6)
514
1,018
(497)
1,035
14,847
5,810
2,126
22,783
(5,357)
(12,156)
(4,322)
10,627
(290)
(10,556)
(4,612)
(11)
(4,623)
71
20
91
Reported
change
%
4
22
(18)
5
(79)
(28)
(4)
(98)
(33)
(98)
Underlying
change
%
4
21
(19)
5
(79)
(29)
(3)
(98)
(35)
(98)
For footnotes, see page 130.
Review of business performance
HSBC’s operations in North America experienced a
significant fall in pre-tax profits of 98 per cent in
2007, on both reported and underlying bases.
It is now clear that the US housing market is
undergoing a significant correction and recovery is
not likely in 2008. The US economy began to slow
in the fourth quarter and recent evidence suggests
that some parts of the country may already be in
recession. As the housing market slump has affected
the real economy, the deterioration in credit quality
that began in the mortgage services business has
extended to include other consumer finance
businesses in the US. In HSBC, this was reflected in
a 79 per cent rise in loan impairment charges and a
loss before tax of US$1.5 billion in Personal
Financial Services.
A loss of US$965 million in Global Banking
and Markets arose from credit-related and liquidity
event write-downs as asset-backed securities markets
became illiquid and credit spreads widened
markedly. Increased revenues in Commercial
93
Banking were the result of balance sheet growth
achieved from the continued expansion of the
business, although this revenue growth only partially
offset rises in expenses and loan impairment charges.
Private Banking profits rose significantly as a result
of the launch of services in Canada, improved
performances in the US and Bermuda and the
non-recurrence of a significant loan impairment
charge in 2006.
The commentary that follows is on an
underlying basis.
Personal Financial Services reported a
pre-tax loss of US$1.5 billion, a decline of
US$4.9 billion from 2006. Performance was
significantly affected by rising loan impairment
charges in the consumer finance business in
mortgage lending, cards and branch personal
lending. Actions taken to manage exposure and
realign the business in response to changes in the
market included stopping new purchases in mortgage
services, tightening underwriting criteria, restricting
the product range in consumer lending, decreasing
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2007
credit lines and reducing the volume of balance
transfers in credit cards, and restructuring the
consumer lending branch network by closing some
400 branches of HSBC Finance to reflect expected
lower demand. These measures gave rise to
restructuring charges of US$103 million in the
US in 2007.
US pre-tax losses of US$1.8 billion were
predominantly due to higher loan impairment
charges, trading losses in the wholesale mortgage
origination business and lower income from fewer
receivables in the correspondent mortgage services
business. In line with industry trends, the credit
quality of loans weakened steadily throughout the
year, particularly those underwritten in 2005, 2006
and the first half of 2007.
In Canada, profit before tax rose by 2 per cent to
US$265 million, benefiting from the strong local
economy. Of this, the retail bank generated
US$116 million, including an US$8 million gain on
the sale of shares in the Montreal Exchange.
Consumer finance operations added US$149 million
through balance sheet expansion in the first part of
the year, prior to a fourth quarter restructuring to
align with changes in the US consumer finance
operation.
Net interest income grew by 1 per cent to
US$13.2 billion as growth in card and average
deposit balances marginally offset a fall in US
deposit margins. In the US, net interest income rose
by 1 per cent as the mix of business changed to
higher yielding activity and HSBC raised rates on
new consumer finance mortgages to reflect increased
risk. The beneficial effect on yields was, however,
more than offset by the impact of non-performing
assets and a higher cost of funds. Higher volumes of
non-performing loans constrained revenue. Fewer
mortgages repaid early as refinancing activity
declined substantially, and this also resulted in lower
prepayment penalties. These factors combined to
limit HSBC’s ability to pass on in full the increased
cost of funds in a higher average rate environment.
This led to an overall decline in spreads.
In the US, average deposit balances were 19 per
cent higher, reflecting growth in the online savings
account and certificate of deposit products. A
competitively priced special promotional rate offer
in the first quarter of 2007 led to 147,000 new
account openings and US$5 billion of new balances
during the year, offset in part by decreases in money
market term deposits. At 31 December 2007, online
savings balances with HSBC Direct stood at
US$11.5 billion, held by more than 620,000
customers. HSBC Premier customer numbers rose
94
by 16 per cent. Deposit spreads tightened, reflecting
a change in the product mix from lower-paying
savings accounts to the higher-paying offerings
available online and in branches. HSBC Bank USA
opened 26 new branches during the year.
The slowdown in the US housing market first
noted in 2006 accelerated in 2007, with further
deterioration in sales of new and existing homes and
lower new-build activity. Market surveys showed a
broad-based decline in house prices, especially for
larger loans and in states that had experienced the
fastest rates of house price appreciation in recent
years. Average US mortgage balances declined by
2 per cent to US$123 billion.
Average mortgage balances originated through
the consumer lending branch network rose by
18 per cent, primarily driven by lower levels of
repayments and the severe contraction in market
capacity, which drove qualifying borrowers to the
few remaining market participants. Actions taken by
HSBC to restrict the product range, increase
collateral requirements, raise prices and close or
consolidate about 400 branches of HSBC Finance
during 2007 combined to curb lending growth
towards the end of the year.
Yields on consumer lending mortgages declined
overall due to increases in delinquency, loan
modifications (which deferred scheduled moves to
higher rates) and levels of non-performing loans, and
decreases in repayments, which resulted in reduced
prepayment penalties. Interest spreads narrowed as
funding costs rose.
In the mortgage services business, average
balances declined by 14 per cent to US$43 billion,
reflecting HSBC’s decision to wind down this book
in response to the deterioration in market conditions.
Spreads fell, driven by higher non-performing loans
and increased funding costs.
HSBC Bank USA’s average mortgage balances
fell by 9 per cent to US$31 billion. HSBC continued
to sell down new loan originations to government-
sponsored enterprises and private investors and, with
the exception of certain products, did not replace the
existing portfolio being run-off. Interest rate spreads
on the prime mortgage portfolio declined, primarily
due to loan portfolio run off.
Average credit card balances increased by
14 per cent to US$29 billion. Volumes in the
sub-prime and near-prime portfolios rose due to
additional marketing to this segment in late 2006 and
the first half of 2007. Expansion slowed during the
second half of 2007 as HSBC restricted growth in
customer loans and advances in light of the
economic outlook. Beginning in the third quarter of
2007, HSBC decreased marketing expenditure in an
effort to slow the growth of balances in the credit
card portfolio. In the fourth quarter of 2007, to
further slow this growth, HSBC slowed the rate of
new account acquisition, tightened the criteria for
authorising initial credit lines and for underwriting
credit line increases, closed inactive accounts,
decreased credit lines, reduced balance transfer
volume and restricted access to cash. Excluding the
one-off increase from a methodology change for
effective interest on introductory rate credit card
loans which increased yields in 2006, yields
improved due both to repricing and a change in the
product mix towards a higher proportion of sub-
prime and near-prime balances, coupled with lower
levels of promotional balances. Spreads widened on
an underlying basis as rate increases preceded any
rise in funding costs.
In retail services, average balances rose by
4 per cent to US$17 billion, driven by organic
growth and the deepening of HSBC’s relationships
with existing partners. Spreads widened as higher
yields on promotional balances (due to fewer people
choosing to pay balances during the introductory
period), and the benefit of price increases more than
offset higher funding costs. Risk mitigation
measures enacted included the tightening of credit
across selected retail businesses, especially the
power sports sector, closure of inactive accounts and
a reduction in the limits for certain other accounts.
Average vehicle loan balances grew by 5 per
cent to US$13 billion despite the adverse effect on
the motor vehicle market of higher interest rates,
rising fuel prices and reduced incentive programmes
from manufacturers. The main driver of growth was
the successful expansion of the consumer direct
channel, with online and direct sales rising by
52 per cent. Refinancing volumes were higher due to
pricing and increased operational capacity. Interest
rate spreads tightened as a result of a shift in
portfolio mix toward higher credit quality loans.
Average balances in personal non-credit card
loans rose by 4 per cent, with actions taken to reduce
risk including a reduction in direct mail campaigns,
the withdrawal of the personal homeowner loan
product in September 2007, and tightening
underwriting criteria. As a result balances declined
towards the end of 2007. Spreads tightened as the
benefits of a shift in mix to higher yielding products
were offset by rising levels of non-performing loans,
which reduced yields, and increased funding costs.
In Canada, net interest income rose by 14 per
cent due to asset and deposit growth, partly offset by
95
competitive margin compression. Average deposit
balances rose by 8 per cent as the rollout of the new
high-rate and direct savings accounts continued.
These products added US$935 million in new
balances and some 11,900 in incremental customer
numbers. HSBC Premier recorded a rise in customer
numbers of 19,000. Deposit spreads were broadly
unchanged as the effects of a change in mix to higher
paying high-rate and direct savings products were
offset by the benefits of an increased proportion of
higher yielding deposits.
Average lending balances in Canada rose by
9 per cent as the strength of the economy and
buoyant housing market drove demand for loans.
While asset spreads at both the retail bank and the
consumer finance business narrowed due to
competitive pressure, overall spreads widened due to
the increased proportion of higher yielding consumer
finance products. Credit expansion was across all
segments with the consumer finance operations
achieving growth in their real estate secured, private
label and credit card portfolios.
Net fee income rose by 24 per cent to
US$4.6 billion, mainly from the US credit cards and
retail services businesses, reflecting growth in
balances. In the US, net fee income rose by 25 per
cent, largely from higher late, overlimit and
Intellicheck fees in the credit card book. Revenues
from enhancement services also rose, primarily from
higher sales of services to new and existing
customers, growth in balances and an increase in
new accounts. In the fourth quarter of 2007, HSBC
changed fee practices on credit cards to ensure they
fully reflected HSBC’s brand principles. This
reduced income by US$55 million in 2007 and is
expected to have a full year effect of up to
approximately US$250 million in 2008.
Taxpayer financial services generated fee
income of US$247 million, 4 per cent lower than in
the previous year due to changes in contractual terms
which increased partner payments, and lower
Internal Revenue Service receipts. Following a
strategic review, pre-season and pre-file products
and cross-collections were discontinued with effect
from the beginning of the 2008 tax season.
Fee income in Canada rose by 3 per cent on
higher investment administration fees from growth
in funds under management, higher fees from the
Immigrant Investor Programme, higher credit fees
and service charges from credit expansion and
increased foreign exchange income. This was partly
offset by lower retail brokerage fees.
At the US retail bank, net fee income rose by
14 per cent to US$320 million, driven by increases
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2007
in servicing fees on mortgages, credit card fees and
deposit service charges.
Trading losses in 2007 were US$215 million
compared with trading income of US$274 million in
2006. Conditions in the housing market meant that
sub-prime mortgages could not be securitised, which
led to significantly wider credit spreads and a
considerable loss of market liquidity across all asset-
backed securities classes. These two factors, the loss
of liquidity and wider credit spreads, resulted in
substantial reductions in the value of mortgages held
for sale. In light of this, HSBC closed Decision One,
its wholesale mortgage business, in the second half
of 2007.
Gains less losses from financial instruments rose
to US$176 million from US$14 million in 2006, due
to the sale of MasterCard Inc. shares following its
IPO.
Other operating income fell by 109 per cent.
Losses on foreclosed properties rose due to the
combined effect of an increase in the stock of such
properties and a reduction in their value due to
falling prices. Total foreclosed assets rose to
US$1.0 billion from US$670 million in 2006. The
fall in other operating income also reflected a
US$123 million gain in 2006 (from the sale of
HSBC’s investment in Kanbay, a global IT services
firm) which did not recur in 2007.
Loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions rose by 78 per cent to
US$11.9 billion. US loan impairment charges rose
by 79 per cent as the deterioration in housing credit
markets extended to affect loans of all product types
and vintages, particularly loans originated in 2005,
2006 and the first half of 2007. The combination of
reduced financing options for consumers and weak
or falling property values had a significant impact on
delinquency levels. Developments in the credit
markets have raised fundamental concerns about the
viability of the ‘originate and distribute’ business
model for securitising residential mortgages. The
resulting industry-wide tightening of underwriting
criteria, and the elimination of many loan products
previously offered to consumers, reduced the general
availability of credit and borrowers’ ability to
refinance. This, in turn, exacerbated house price
falls, most notably in those areas which had seen the
most rapid appreciation in recent years.
Lower house prices reduced the equity which
customers had in their homes, removing a key source
of accessible funds and reducing customers’ capacity
to deal with unexpected problems such as
unemployment or illness. Bankruptcy levels also
increased from the exceptionally low levels seen
in 2006 which followed changes in bankruptcy
legislation in 2005.
In mortgage services, loan impairment charges
rose by 41 per cent to US$3.1 billion. Due to the
factors noted above, delinquencies increased at a
higher rate than was expected from normal portfolio
seasoning1, particularly for second lien customers.
In consumer lending, loan impairment charges
rose by 139 per cent to US$4.1 billion as evidence of
credit quality deterioration was seen across the loan
portfolio in the second half of 2007, in particular on
first lien loans originated in 2006. There was also
increased delinquency on second lien loans
purchased between 2004 and the third quarter of
2006. Lower run-offs of loans, growth in average
lending balances, normal seasoning and a rise in
bankruptcy filings to historically more usual levels
after the exceptional decline in 2006, also
contributed to the rise. There was a marked increase
in loan delinquency in those states most affected by
the fall in home values.
Credit card impairment charges rose by 83 per
cent to US$2.8 billion as a result of weaker
economic trends, growth in balances, normal
portfolio seasoning, a rise in bankruptcy rates closer
to historical levels, and a shift in mix to a higher
proportion of non-prime loans.
Loan impairment charges in Canada rose by
38 per cent, in line with the rise in loan balances and
seasoning of the vehicle finance and credit card
portfolios. In addition, an impairment charge on non-
bank asset-backed commercial paper (‘ABCP’) was
recognised in 2007.
Operating expenses rose by 2 per cent to
US$7.6 billion. In the US, while origination costs
fell as loan growth was curtailed, additional
resources were deployed to collection activities and
the retail bank added selectively to its branch
distribution network. Within the consumer finance
operations, restructuring costs in 2007 totalled
US$103 million, following the decision to reposition
the US consumer finance business, the closure of the
wholesale mortgage services business and the
reduction in the number of branches in the US
consumer lending network to around 1,000 to align
with the level of demand expected in light of the
Group’s revised risk appetite. The retail bank
incurred higher staff costs due to expansion of the
branch network, higher average salaries due to
normal annual pay increases, and a change in mix of
1 ‘Seasoning’ describes the emergence of credit loss patterns in portfolios over time.
96
staffing to support business growth initiatives. Also
contributing was US$70 million of one-off costs
arising from the indemnification agreement with
Visa ahead of the company’s planned IPO.
Marketing costs to support the growth in
Personal Financial Services lending increased in
2007, but in the second half expenditure on credit
cards, co-branded credit cards and personal non-
credit card marketing declined following the
decision to slow loan growth in these portfolios. In
HSBC Bank USA, marketing costs rose as a result of
campaigns promoting the online savings product and
investment in the HSBC brand, including the
Newark Airport branding and the HSBC Premier
relaunch. The expansion of the bank branch network
in existing and new geographical areas also
increased premises and other branch operating costs.
In Canada, operating expenses increased by
13 per cent due to the strategic growth of the branch
network, marketing to support new products, related
investment in systems, and higher transaction costs
caused by the rise in customer numbers. Staff
numbers, premises and equipment costs rose, partly
due to the opening of five new branches. Marketing
costs rose too, principally due to direct savings and
brand awareness campaigns. The Canadian
consumer finance business restructured its business
model to align with changes in the US consumer
finance operations, reducing lending through its
branch network and closing the correspondent
mortgage business. A total of 29 consumer finance
branches were closed.
Commercial Banking’s pre-tax profits of
US$920 million declined by 6 per cent compared
with 2006. In the US, loan and deposit balances
grew with the continuing expansion of the branch
network outside its traditional base into 16 of the
top 25 business centres by the end of the year,
complemented by a restructuring of the branch sales
force. Despite this growth, overall performance
declined as business expansion costs, restructuring
costs, lower gains on asset disposals, a slowdown
in commercial and real estate activity and a
deterioration in the credit environment more
than offset the benefit of higher volumes.
In Canada, profit before tax was broadly flat at
US$466 million, driven by strong balance sheet
growth, notwithstanding the wider funding and
liquidity pressures which arose from the freezing of
the non-bank ABCP market in Canada in August.
In the US, net interest income rose by 10 per
cent to US$804 million, driven by average deposit
growth of 20 per cent and loan growth of 6 per cent.
Organic expansion underpinned the increase, with
97
recently opened offices in Chicago, Washington DC
and the West Coast contributing to growth. Net
interest income growth slowed as a result of
declining commercial real estate activity, with higher
repayments and slower replacement business
reflecting market conditions and credit appetite.
There were also narrower spreads on deposits, as
customers migrated to higher yielding products.
Average deposit balances in the US rose by
20 per cent, led by a 21 per cent increase in volumes
from small business customers. The expansion of the
network and targeted marketing initiatives were key
factors in the rise. Spreads narrowed as the product
mix changed towards higher yielding accounts,
particularly among small business customers, partly
offsetting the gains to income from higher balances.
Average loan balances in the US were 4 per cent
higher. Loan growth was primarily due to strong
activity in middle market lending, up 20 per cent,
with growth coming equally from existing branches
and geographic expansion. Overall loan growth was,
however, much lower as a result of a slowdown in
financing commercial real estate activity, where
lending volumes fell by 6 per cent. Competitive
pressures led to narrower spreads.
In Canada, net interest income rose by 14 per
cent, driven by strong loan growth, particularly in
Western Canada. Average deposit balances rose by
10 per cent, with volumes lifted by the success of the
payments and cash management business. Spreads
rose as repricing initiatives on key products offset
the effects of competitive pressures and increased
funding costs over the last four months of 2007, due
to the disruption caused to the ABCP market by
constrained liquidity, as described above.
Average lending balances rose by 17 per cent,
buoyed by the strong economic backdrop. There was
notable expansion in Western Canada, where the
resource economy continued to underpin
performance. Spreads were tighter due to spread
compression on floating rate loans.
In Bermuda, net interest income increased by
15 per cent. Average deposit balances fell by 6 per
cent, mainly due to lower than expected growth in
volumes of fixed term deposits.
Net fee income was broadly unchanged at
US$338 million. In the US, fee income was flat
compared with 2006. The growth in deposit accounts
and a focus on business debit cards for small and
micro businesses led to a rise in deposit service
charges and card fees. This was, however, offset by
lower fees on the syndication of commercial real
estate loans as balance activity declined. In Canada,
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2007 / 2006
fee income rose with the increase in activity
volumes. Higher service charges and credit fees
were the main fee generators.
Loan impairment charges rose by 151 per cent
to US$191 million, reflecting the growth in the loan
book. In the US, loan impairment charges rose by
91 per cent, mainly due to the higher probability of
default among commercial real estate loans and a
change in methodology for loan impairment
allowances on a small business revolving loan
portfolio. Several condominium development
projects took longer to complete than intended,
resulting in cash flow issues for some customers.
This hindered their ability to obtain a mortgage at
the end of the construction phase which, in some
cases, precipitated downgrades by ratings agencies,
all of which combined to generate increased
impairment charges. In Canada, loan impairment
charges increased due to exposures to certain sectors
affected by the strength of the Canadian dollar. An
impairment charge for non-bank ABCP was also
taken. The risk reflected the historically low
impairment charges incurred in 2006.
Operating expenses rose by 8 per cent to
US$893million. US costs rose by 9 per cent as the
expansion of the branch network led to higher staff
and administration costs. Costs for collection
activities also rose. In Canada, costs rose by 2 per
cent due to an increase in headcount, higher staff
incentives, increases in business licenses, taxes, and
higher cheque clearing costs in line with rises in
business activity levels. The tight labour market
added upward pressure on staff costs and created
challenges in filling vacancies, particularly in
Western Canada.
Global Banking and Markets in North
America reported a pre-tax loss of US$965 million,
compared with a profit of US$423 million in 2006.
Improvements across most businesses were
overwhelmed by significant losses in mortgages,
mortgage-backed securities and structured credit
products held for trading, which were driven by
widening credit spreads following the deterioration
in credit markets in the second half of 2007. In
addition, leveraged and acquisition finance recorded
write-downs on underwriting positions held.
Total operating income of US$645 million was
69 per cent lower than 2006, reflecting the impact of
the above-mentioned losses and write-downs, partly
offset by higher net interest income from corporate
lending and increased deposit balances in payments
and cash management.
The 38 per cent rise in net interest income partly
reflected increased lending driven by client demand
98
and higher outstanding unsyndicated loan balances
in financing and capital markets.
Payments and cash management delivered a
43 per cent increase in net interest income as a result
of growth in demand deposits, and a 15 per cent
increase in transaction fees as higher volumes were
generated from a wider range of product offerings.
Net fee income was 6 per cent ahead of 2006.
Apart from the growth in payments and cash
management referred to above, a strong performance
in HSBC Global Asset Management reflected
favourable market conditions in the first half of
the year.
Trading losses of US$734 million compared
with income of US$818 million in 2006. The decline
was driven by write-downs in credit and structured
derivatives, as detailed above, including
US$282 million relating to monoline exposures, of
which those below investment grade have been fully
written down. These losses were only partly offset
by strong foreign exchange revenues where trading
volumes benefited from market volatility and
positioning against a weakening US dollar. Trading
income from the rates business also increased, driven
by investor demand for lower risk products.
The credit market dislocation also led to an
adverse fair value adjustment for loan commitments
outstanding when global credit spreads widened in
the second half of the year. Including this and the
credit and structured derivatives write-downs
referred to above, the total write-down was
US$1.4 billion.
The benign corporate credit environment
experienced in recent years continued and
impairment charges were low, albeit higher
than in 2006.
Operating expenses declined by 5 per cent,
mainly as a result of reduced performance-related
remuneration resulting from lower revenues.
Expenses were also reduced by savings initiatives
started in late 2006 and early 2007 though these
were offset by the restructuring costs associated
with the Group’s exit from the mortgage-backed
securities business.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit
of US$174 million. Excluding a US$39 million
geographical reclassification, the underlying
increase was 27 per cent, reflecting improvements
in Bermuda and the US, the addition of Private
Banking in Canada and a one-off gain from the sale
of Wealth and Tax Advisory Services (‘WTAS’) to
its management. The revenue growth was partially
offset by increased costs from the launch of Private
Banking in Canada. The cost efficiency ratio
reflected this, remaining broadly flat at 69.3 per cent.
Net interest income increased by 14 per cent
to US$273 million, excluding a US$42 million
geographical reclassification. This was driven by
new business in Canada and an increase in deposit
volumes in Bermuda. Net interest income in the US
remained broadly flat as a result of competitive
pressures.
Growth in net fee income of 16 per cent to
US$279 million was driven by higher investment in
discretionary funds especially the multi-manager
products offered in the US. WTAS also contributed
to the rise; this business was subsequently sold on
31 December 2007 in order to enable Private
Banking to focus on core activities. The sale resulted
in an US$18 million gain in other operating income.
Client assets of US$58 billion, an increase
of 35 per cent, reflected expansion into Canada, a
market-driven rise in assets and net new money of
US$933 million.
Loan impairment charges decreased by 71 per
cent to US$10 million, reflecting the non-recurrence
of a large single loan impairment charge in 2006.
Operating expenses rose by 17 per cent to
US$415 million, with a rise in staff costs in both
support and front-office positions and the launch
of operations in Canada.
Within Other, profit before tax increased to
US$1.5 billion, driven largely by significant
fair value movements on HSBC’s own debt as a
result of the widening of credit spreads and related
derivatives in the second half of the year.
HSBC Technology USA Inc. and hsbc.com
provide technology services across North America,
the costs of which are recharged to specific entities.
Increased activity during the period contributed to a
14 per cent rise in operating expenses which were
recovered through ‘Other operating income’.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Economic briefing
In the US, GDP growth in 2006 was 2.9 per cent.
Growth in the second half of the year moderated to
below 3 per cent, after average annualised growth of
4.1 per cent in the first half of the year. Consumer
spending in 2006 grew by 3.4 per cent, with average
annualised growth of 3.6 per cent in the second half
of the year. Housing activity weakened substantially
in 2006, with annualised declines in residential
investment of 11 per cent in the second quarter
99
followed by annualised declines of 19 per cent in the
third and fourth quarters of the year. There was some
optimism that housing starts may have begun to
stabilise by the year-end, with housing permits rising
in December after ten successive monthly falls.
Continued strong profits growth meant that business
investment remained robust but industrial production
weakened markedly towards the end of the year. The
unemployment rate remained relatively low,
averaging 4.6 per cent in 2006. The trade deficit
stabilised through most of the year and narrowed in
the final months of 2006 in response to strong global
growth and a weaker US dollar. Inflation rose by
4.3 per cent in the first half of the year due to energy
price rises but subsequently fell to an annual rate of
about 2 per cent as energy prices declined. The
Federal Reserve raised short-term interest rates by
1 per cent in the first half of 2006 to 5.25 per cent,
but kept rates unchanged thereafter. After rising
from 4.4 per cent to 5.2 per cent in the first half of
2006, 10-year note yields fell to a low of 4.4 per cent
in early December before increasing to 4.7 per cent
by the year-end. The S&P500 stock market index
rose by 13.6 per cent in the year.
The Canadian economy slowed during 2006,
with GDP growth falling from an annualised rate of
3.6 per cent at the beginning of the year to 1.7 per
cent by the third quarter, largely reflecting slower
export growth. Domestic demand remained robust
and HSBC expects the momentum seen in 2006 to
continue through 2007, supported by historically low
levels of unemployment and a housing market
which, although showing signs of moderation,
remained strong throughout 2006. Although energy
prices eased, 2006’s commodity boom was expected
to continue benefiting the Canadian economy
through 2007. Inflation remained problematic with
core prices moving above the Bank of Canada’s
preferred target rate of 2 per cent, and productivity
remained relatively weak. Having raised its
overnight interest rate from 3.25 per cent at the
start of 2006 to 4.25 per cent in May, the Bank of
Canada kept rates on hold for the rest of the year.
Review of business performance
HSBC’s operations in North America reported a
pre-tax profit of US$4.7 billion compared with
US$5.9 billion in 2005, a decrease of 21 per cent. On
an underlying basis, pre-tax profits declined by 25
per cent. Underlying net operating income before
loan impairment charges was higher by 6 per cent,
reflecting the income benefit of asset growth in
Personal Financial Services. This revenue growth
was more than offset by a significant rise in loan
impairment charges in the correspondent mortgage
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2006
services business within HSBC Finance, as slowing
house price appreciation and the projected effect of
interest rate resets impacted loss estimates from
rising credit delinquency. This is described more
fully below and on page 221. In Commercial
Banking, investment in distribution channels
delivered growth from increased lending and deposit
taking. In Global Banking and Markets, strong
trading results more than offset lower balance sheet
management revenues, which were constrained by
compressed spreads in a flat interest rate yield curve
environment. Underlying operating expenses
increased by 13 per cent to support investment in
business expansion and branch openings in the
Personal Financial Services business.
The commentary that follows is on an
underlying basis.
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
North America
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 .....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ......
Operating expenses ..........
Operating profit ...............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
13,295
3,952
2,294
19,541
(4,916)
14,625
(8,758)
5,867
48
5,915
56
21
9
86
3
89
(43)
46
–
46
13,351
3,973
2,303
19,627
(4,913)
14,714
(8,801)
5,913
48
5,961
528
225
13
766
(291)
475
(291)
184
–
184
2006
as
reported
US$m
14,268
4,766
2,593
21,627
389
568
277
1,234
(1,592)
(6,796)
(358)
14,831
(1,101)
(10,193)
(1,459)
4,638
(18)
30
(1,477)
4,668
Reported
change
%
7
21
13
11
(38)
1
(16)
(21)
(38)
(21)
Underlying
change
%
3
14
12
6
(32)
(2)
(13)
(25)
(38)
(25)
Personal Financial Services generated a pre-
tax profit of US$3.4 billion, a decrease of 23 per cent
compared with 2005. Net operating income rose at a
slower rate than cost growth, due to constrained
balance sheet growth in the second half of the year,
higher collection expense and significantly higher
loan impairment charges. The increased loan
impairment charges recognised in respect of HSBC
Finance’s correspondent mortgage services business
more than offset the non-recurrence of charges
arising in respect of hurricane Katrina and the
change in bankruptcy legislation in 2005. The cost
efficiency ratio worsened as costs rose faster than
revenues.
In the US, pre-tax profit of US$3.1 billion was
24 per cent lower than in 2005, reflecting the
significantly higher loan impairment charges noted
above and additional costs incurred in support of
business expansion in both the consumer finance
company and the retail bank. Beginning in 2004,
HSBC implemented a growth strategy for its core
banking network in the US which included building
deposits over a three to five year period across
multiple markets and segments utilising diverse
delivery systems. During 2006 the strategy included
various initiatives, the most important of these being
growing the deposit base by emphasising more
competitive pricing and introducing high yielding
products, including internet savings accounts. These
have grown significantly since late 2005 to
US$7 billion, of which US$6 billion arose in 2006
and US$5 billion of the 2006 growth was from new
customers. Retail branch expansion in existing and
new geographic markets was also a key initiative,
with 25 new branches opened in 2006.
In Canada, profit before tax was 21 per cent
lower, partly due to the absence of provision releases
made in 2005 in the core banking operations.
Revenues rose but this was offset by costs incurred
in support of expansion in consumer finance and
investments made in the bank distribution channels.
Net interest income of US$13.0 billion was
7 per cent higher than in 2005. In the US, there was
strong growth in mortgages, cards and other personal
non-credit card lending, particularly in the first half
of the year, and this, coupled with higher deposit
balances, led to a 6 per cent increase in net interest
100
income as competition reduced both asset and
deposit spreads.
Average deposit balances in the US rose by
21 per cent to US$32.2 billion, mainly led by the
continued success of online savings. The HSBC
Premier investor product also continued to grow
strongly. During the year over 22,000 new accounts
were opened and balances rose by 139 per cent as
US$2.1 billion in incremental deposits were taken.
Customers migrated to higher yielding products
which led to a change in product mix, and the
consequent reduction in spreads partly offset the
benefits of balance growth.
There was a marked slowdown in the US
housing market during 2006, although towards the
end of the year demand for housing showed signs of
stabilising. However, the supply of houses for sale
remained high, with the overall outlook still
uncertain. Average mortgage balances rose by 9 per
cent to US$123.8 billion, with growth concentrated
in non-prime balances in the mortgage services
correspondent and branch-based consumer lending
businesses. Prime mortgage balances originated and
retained through the core banking network continued
to decline. This reflected an ongoing strategic
initiative to manage the balance sheet by selling the
majority of new prime loan originations to
government-sponsored enterprises and private
investors, along with planned securitisations and the
normal run-off of balances. Overall, yields improved
from the combined effects of a change in product
mix to higher-yielding non-prime mortgages and re-
pricing initiatives. Despite this improvement in
yields, spreads narrowed due to higher funding costs
as interest rates rose, and this reduced the positive
income benefit of the higher lending balances.
The following comments on mortgage lending
relate to HSBC Finance as mortgage lending growth
in 2006 was concentrated in this business.
In the branch-based consumer lending business,
average mortgage balances grew by 15 per cent to
US$41.2 billion as lending secured on real estate,
which included a near-prime product introduced in
2003, was pursued. This growth was augmented
by portfolio acquisitions, most notably the
US$2.5 billion Champion mortgage portfolio
purchased from KeyBank, NA in November 2006.
In the mortgage services correspondent
business, average balances of US$49.9 billion were
28 per cent higher than in 2005. During 2005 and the
first half of 2006, emphasis was placed on increasing
both first and second lien mortgages by expanding
sources for the purchase of loans from
correspondents. In the second quarter of 2006,
101
HSBC began to witness deterioration in the
performance of mortgages acquired in 2005,
particularly in the second lien and portions of the
first lien portfolios. This deterioration continued in
the third quarter and began to affect the equivalent
loans acquired in 2006. In the final quarter of 2006,
the deterioration worsened considerably, mainly in
first lien ARM balances and second lien loans.
A series of actions were initiated in the third
quarter to mitigate risk in the affected components
of the portfolio. These included revising pricing
in selected origination segments, tightening
underwriting criteria to eliminate or substantially
reduce higher risk products (especially in respect of
second lien, stated income (low documentation) and
lower credit scoring segments), and enhancing
segmentation and analytics to identify higher risk
portions of the portfolio and increase collections.
These initiatives led to a decline in overall portfolio
balances during the second half of 2006, mostly
attributable to lower purchases of second lien and
certain higher-risk products, along with the normal
run-off of balances.
Average credit card balances in the US rose by
6 per cent to US$26.8 billion. The market continued
to be highly competitive with many lenders placing
reliance on promotional rate offers to generate
growth. HSBC took a strategic decision to reduce the
amount of its equivalent offers and instead grew its
HSBC branded prime, Union Privilege and non-
prime portfolios largely from targeted marketing
campaigns. Margins widened, reflecting improved
yields as the product mix changed towards higher
levels of non-prime and lower levels of promotional
balances, coupled with other re-pricing initiatives
undertaken on variable rate products. This more than
offset the adverse effect of higher funding costs and
augmented the income benefits of the increased loan
book.
In the retail services business, average balances
rose by 6 per cent to US$15.8 billion. This was
mainly driven by newer merchants, changes in
product mix and the launch of three co-branded
programmes; the MasterCard and Visa partnerships
with Best Buy and Saks Fifth Avenue, and the
Neiman Marcus co-branded card with American
Express. The positive income benefits from higher
balances were more than offset by lower spreads, as
a large proportion of the loan book priced at fixed
rates was affected by higher funding costs. This was
further affected by changes in the product mix as
lower yielding department store card balances grew
more strongly, and by competitive downward pricing
pressures. Changes in merchant contractual
obligations also led to lower net interest income,
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2006
though this was offset by reduced partnership
payments to those merchants.
overdue payments contributed further to the
increase.
Growth opportunities in the motor vehicle
financing industry were particularly challenging in
2006, driven by a reduction in incentive programmes
offered by manufacturers and a rising interest rate
environment. Notwithstanding these factors, average
balances rose by 12 per cent. This was led by strong
organic growth in the near-prime portfolio from an
increased emphasis on strengthening relationships
with active dealers, and greater volumes generated
from the consumer direct programme. Refinancing
volumes rose, directly attributable to the successful
consumer refinance programme, which recorded a
48 per cent increase in originations.
In Canada, net interest income rose by 16 per
cent due to lending and deposit growth. Average
mortgage balances grew as a result of the continued
strength of the housing market and ongoing branch
expansion in the consumer finance business. The
strong economy drove higher levels of unsecured
lending as consumer spending rose. Expansion of the
consumer finance motor vehicle proposition and the
launch of a MasterCard programme in 2005
contributed further to asset growth, while increased
marketing activity led to a rise in personal non-credit
card lending balances. Asset spreads narrowed,
largely from lower yields which reflected changes in
product mix and competitive market conditions.
Average deposit balances grew by 6 per cent
compared with 2005, with the notable success of a
new high rate savings account and a sale campaign
celebrating HSBC’s 25th anniversary in Canada.
Deposit spreads widened as interest rates rose,
contributing further to the increase in net interest
income.
Net fee income grew by 13 per cent to
US$3.7 billion, with increases in both the US and
Canada. The 13 per cent rise in the US was largely
led by higher fees from the credit card and retail
services businesses. Credit card fee income from the
consumer finance business increased by 8 per cent,
primarily from balance growth in the non-prime
portfolio, improved interchange rates and lower fee
charge-offs. Revenues from credit card partnership
enhancement services rose due to greater sales
volumes, expansion into new customer segments and
balance growth.
Within the US retail services business, net fee
income rose, reflecting lower merchant payments, in
part due to changes in contract obligations with
certain merchants. A rise in late fees from growth in
customer account balances and higher fees on
102
In the US mortgage-banking business, net fee
income declined. Although mortgage loan service
volumes grew in 2006, contributing additional fee
income from the greater proportion of mortgages
originated and then sold with mortgage servicing
rights (‘MSRs’) retained, these benefits were more
than offset by higher amortisation charges and lower
releases of temporary impairment provisions on
MSRs. The taxpayer financial services business
generated higher fee income from increased loan
volumes during the 2006 tax season.
In Canada, net fee income rose by 5 per cent to
US$217 million. Continued growth in the wealth
management business resulted in higher investment
administration fees, and credit card fee income rose,
driven by increased lending.
Trading income fell by 17 per cent, due to lower
income on HSBC Finance’s Decision One mortgage
balances held for resale to secondary market
purchasers. This primarily reflected additional losses
incurred following the repurchase of certain
mortgages previously sold to external third parties
which had subsequently gone into default. Higher
losses on derivatives that did not meet the criteria for
hedge accounting contributed further to the decrease.
A US$20 million gain from the MasterCard
Incorporated IPO was the key reason for the increase
in gains from financial instruments.
Other operating income also rose, primarily
driven by gains on various asset disposals. Most
notably, a US$123 million profit was achieved on
disposal of HSBC’s investment in Kanbay
International Inc, a worldwide information
technology services firm. Income from overnight
and short-term money market investments also rose.
These benefits were partly offset by greater losses
incurred on sales of repossessed properties,
following a 42 per cent rise in such properties as
customers defaulted on their mortgage payments.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions of US$6.7 billion were 28 per cent higher
than in 2005. In the US, loan impairment charges
rose by 28 per cent despite the non-recurrence of
significant charges which arose in 2005 following
hurricane Katrina and increased levels of bankruptcy
filings in the final quarter of the year. Loan
impairment charges were also higher in the second
half of 2006 compared with both the preceding half
and the second half of 2005. The increase was
primarily driven by significantly higher
delinquencies and losses in the mortgage services
correspondent business, concentrated in second lien
and portions of first lien mortgages originated and
purchased in 2005 and 2006. As noted previously,
HSBC witnessed a deterioration in the performance
of these 2005 originations during the first half of
2006. This deterioration continued into the third
quarter and started to affect equivalent loans
originated in 2006. In the final quarter of 2006,
deterioration of these loans, largely the first lien
adjustable-rate and second lien loans, worsened
considerably. The heightened risk of loss was
attributable to lower equity in homes as price growth
moderated or reversed, together with a higher
prospective interest burden from ARM resets. As
many of these mortgages were being re-priced in an
environment of higher interest rates, slower asset
price appreciation and tightening credit, HSBC
considers it highly likely that these factors will lead
to increased instances of default in the future on both
first and any associated second lien loans.
Accordingly, a significant increase in loan
impairment charges was recorded in the final
quarter of the year.
Higher lending, the seasoning of the loan
portfolio, and a return to more normal historical
levels of delinquency from the exceptionally
favourable credit conditions experienced in recent
periods, all contributed to the overall increase in
impairment charges in the US. This was partly offset
by lower numbers and levels of bankruptcy filings
and the positive effect of low unemployment. The
credit card business, in addition, benefited from
improved recovery rates from loans previously
written off. Notwithstanding the accelerated credit
weakness witnessed in the mortgage services
correspondent business, credit performance as
measured by delinquency and loss in the majority of
the other lending portfolios, including mortgage
balances originated through the branch-based
consumer lending business gradually deteriorated
from the seasoning of a growing portfolio and the
rising proportion of credit card balances. Loan
impairment charges in these portfolios were
consequently higher in the second half of 2006 as
these portfolios seasoned, coinciding with the
weakening housing market.
In Canada, loan impairment charges were 38 per
cent higher. This primarily reflected the non-
recurrence of loan impairment releases from core
banking operations, which occurred in 2005, as well
as growth in both secured and unsecured lending
balances and higher delinquency rates in the motor
vehicle finance business.
Operating expenses grew by 12 per cent
to US$7.4 billion. In the US, costs of US$6.7 billion
103
were 11 per cent higher than in 2005. In the
consumer finance business, the rise was driven by
increased headcount to support incremental
collections activity, and greater volumes. Higher
costs were incurred in marketing cards to support the
launch of new co-branded credit cards, greater levels
of mailing and other promotional campaigns in the
cards and retail services businesses. IT and
administrative expenses grew in support of higher
asset balances. A lower level of deferred origination
costs in the mortgage services business, due to a
decline in volumes, contributed further to the cost
growth.
In HSBC Bank USA, expense growth was
primarily driven by branch staff costs from
additional headcount recruited to support investment
in business expansion and new branch openings.
Greater emphasis placed on increasing the quality
and number of branch staff dedicated to sales and
customer relationship activities, which changed the
staff mix, also contributed to cost growth. The
continued promotion of the online savings product,
new branch openings and branding initiatives at the
John F. Kennedy International and LaGuardia
airports in New York led to a rise in marketing costs.
IT costs also grew following significant investment
expenditure incurred on several key network
efficiency projects.
In Canada, costs rose by 19 per cent, mainly due
to higher staff and marketing costs. Staff costs grew
by 13 per cent, with increased headcount supporting
expansion of the consumer finance business and
bank distribution network. Continuing investment in
growing the wealth management business and higher
incentive costs reflecting improved revenues also
contributed to the increase. Marketing costs grew
following external campaigns to improve brand
awareness.
Commercial Banking’s pre-tax profits rose by
4 per cent to US$957 million, largely driven by
lending and deposit growth and higher fee income,
partly offset by increased loan impairment charges.
Costs rose mainly from geographical expansion in
the US and branch and business expansion in
Canada. The cost efficiency ratio worsened by
2.1 percentage points, as costs grew faster than
revenues.
Net interest income grew by 15 per cent to
US$1.4 billion. In the US, net interest income was
13 per cent higher, as HSBC continued to expand its
geographical presence, notably in Boston,
Connecticut, New Jersey, Philadelphia, Washington
D.C., Chicago and Los Angeles. Average deposit
balances rose by 30 per cent, aided by geographical
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2006
expansion and greater focus placed on generating
balances from commercial real estate companies and
middle market customers. In particular, there was an
increased emphasis on attracting high margin
balances from cash management sales activities.
Rising interest rates encouraged customers to
transfer funds to higher yielding products and the
resulting change in product mix led to a narrowing
of liability spreads.
The 7 per cent growth in average lending
balances was principally led by greater volumes
generated from small business and middle market
customers. This was achieved by a combination of
geographical expansion, increased marketing activity
and the recruitment of additional small-business
relationship managers. Asset spreads narrowed due
to competitive pricing pressures, particularly in the
middle market customer segment, which partly
offset the income benefits from higher lending
volumes.
In Canada, net interest income increased by
14 per cent. The strong economy encouraged
continued business investment by customers and
this, in conjunction with HSBC’s reputation for
customer service and relationship management,
helped generate a 15 per cent growth in average
lending balances. Loan spreads were broadly in line
with 2005. There was a 35 per cent improvement in
average deposit balances, driven by various factors
including the acquisition of new customers,
strengthening relationships with existing ones, and
enhancing payment and cash management products.
Deposit spreads widened as interest rates rose,
augmenting the income benefits from higher
balances.
Net interest income in Bermuda grew by
42 per cent, partly due to interest rate rises which
widened deposit spreads. Deposit balances increased
by 26 per cent, while increased cross-sales activity
contributed to a 26 per cent rise in average lending
balances.
Net fee income improved by 13 per cent to
US$329 million. In the US, the 11 per cent rise was
primarily due to an increase in syndication
capabilities, which led to higher commercial
mortgage fees, and from business expansion into
new geographical markets. In Canada, growth in
new lending business led to higher levels of service
charges, and credit fees increased following the rise
in customer numbers. Product enhancements and
additions to the sales force helped grow fee income
from payment and cash management services.
104
There was a small reduction in other operating
income, largely due to the net effects of lower gains
on asset disposals in the US.
Also in the US, the redemption of bonds
issued by the Venezuelan government led to a
US$19 million gain from financial instruments.
Loan impairment charges were US$74 million
compared with a net release of US$21 million in
2005. In the US, the increase reflected strong growth
in lending balances to small and middle market
customers, higher write-offs in the small business
segment and the exceptionally low charges recorded
in 2005 compared with historical levels. Loan
impairment charges rose in Canada following the
non-recurrence of releases which occurred in 2005
and, in Bermuda, net releases compared with charges
in 2005.
Operating expenses grew by 21 per cent to
US$814 million. The 27 per cent rise in the US was
driven by a combination of increased costs incurred
in support of geographical expansion and the
recruitment of additional sales staff to drive revenue
growth. In Canada, operating expenses were 14 per
cent higher from additional headcount recruited to
support branch and network expansion and increased
salary and bonus costs, which reflected improved
revenues. Expenditure incurred in order to develop
the business, largely due to HSBC brand campaigns,
contributed further to cost growth.
Income from associates rose by US$34 million,
including HSBC’s share from an equity investment
in Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank N.A. of
US$11 million in the US. Income from associates of
US$22 million in Canada was attributable to higher
gains and distributions from private equity fund
investments. These funds, in which HSBC has
maintained a minority interest, were established to
provide institutional investors with access to private
equity investment opportunities.
Global Banking and Markets reported a pre-
tax profit of US$423 million, 28 per cent lower than
in 2005. The result in 2005 benefited from a
US$106 million favourable movement on ineffective
hedges on HSBC’s own debt and, excluding this,
profit before tax decreased by 12 per cent. The fall in
profits was primarily due to a decline in balance
sheet management revenues. Balance sheet
management activity continued to be constrained
by compressed spreads in a flat interest rate
yield curve environment, with a resultant decrease of
US$347 million. Operating expenses were higher by
19 per cent with a significant portion of the increase
driven by the first full year effect of recruitment
and business expansion in 2005, and by specific
initiatives taken in early 2006. This investment in
extending the trading platform, notably in mortgage-
backed securities, structured derivatives, metals and
foreign exchange, produced record trading revenues.
Net fee income and trading income also grew,
reflecting the measures taken to strengthen HSBC’s
presence in the region.
In Global Banking, net interest income in
payments and cash management rose by 66 per cent,
largely due to an over 50 per cent growth in
balances.
Net fee income rose by 13 per cent to
US$656 million. Increases in fee income within the
newly expanded mortgage-backed securities and
equity underwriting businesses were driven by
higher volumes. The securities services business
benefited from a combination of new client volumes
and market-driven asset growth. However, income
from debt underwriting activity declined due to
fewer deals, particularly in the second half of the
year. In Global Banking, higher transaction volumes
in the recently enhanced payments and cash
management business, and an increase in customer
volumes driven by a wider product offering, led to
higher net fee income.
HSBC’s operation in Canada reported a 31 per
cent increase in fees, reflecting a growth in funds
under management within HSBC Global Asset
Management, coupled with higher fees from the
lending business and securities services.
Net trading income more than doubled to
US$818 million. In Global Markets, a wider product
offering and improved sales capabilities drove
significant gains across all major client-related
activities. Revenues were further boosted by the first
full year contribution from the mortgage-backed
securities trading business. Credit and Rates
benefited from tightening credit spreads and
increased customer flows. Structured derivatives
income more than doubled, reflecting successful
product launches as well as increased sales of
tailored solutions. Revenues in the foreign exchange
business remained robust against the backdrop of a
weakening US dollar.
In Canada, trading income more than doubled,
with higher gains from foreign exchange; a result of
increased volatility of the Canadian dollar against
the US dollar.
Gains from financial investments were
79 per cent lower as income from the disposal of
securities declined.
105
A 50 per cent increase in other income was
driven in part by higher revenues in HSBC’s
Sharia-compliant property fund business, which
were offset by higher related costs.
The overall credit environment remained stable,
although a small loan impairment charge of
US$3 million compared unfavourably to a net
release of US$64 million in 2005.
Operating expenses increased by 19 per cent to
US$1,641 million, mainly due to the first full year
effect of the business expansion which took place in
2005 and additional expenditure in early 2006. In
Global Markets, cost growth was primarily driven
by the mortgage-backed securities, structured
derivatives and equity businesses. Staff costs
increased by 11 per cent, reflecting the first full year
effect of people recruited in 2005, performance
incentives that rose in line with revenue and
selective hires in early 2006.
Operational expenses in the payments and cash
management and the securities services businesses
increased as business volumes grew and the related
support businesses were expanded.
HSBC’s share of profits from associates
declined significantly reflecting the non-recurrence
of distributions from a private equity associate.
Private Banking contributed a pre-tax profit
of US$114 million, an increase of 12 per cent
compared with 2005. HSBC’s onshore presence was
enhanced by the opening of offices in Chicago and
Greenwich, Connecticut. Revenue growth, driven
by significantly higher core fees and commissions
and improved trading results, was offset in part
by loan impairment charges of US$35 million,
US$29 million of which related to a single customer.
The cost efficiency ratio improved by 6.2 percentage
points to 70.4 per cent.
Net interest income increased by 15 per cent to
US$212 million. A deposit-raising campaign proved
successful at garnering funds, the total raised by the
year-end reaching US$2.5 billion. Overall, deposit
balances rose by 25 per cent and lending balances
increased by 14 per cent. Deposit spreads were
marginally lower than in 2005.
Net fee income grew strongly, increasing by
20 per cent to US$240 million. WTAS continued to
expand its client base – it rose by 31 per cent in 2006
– and reported significant revenue growth, benefiting
from restrictions placed on the major auditing firms
with regard to providing personal tax advice to
employees of audit clients. Higher funds under
management and an increase in referrals with other
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > 2006 / Profit/(loss) before tax by customer group
HSBC businesses also contributed to the increased
level of fee income.
A one-off gain of US$9 million arose from a
partial disposal of a holding in the Hermitage Fund,
offsetting the non-recurrence of US$9 million of
income following the sale of a number of small trust
businesses in 2005.
Client assets increased by 5 per cent to
US$43 billion, with net new money of US$5 billion.
This included a significant contribution from the
higher fee-earning discretionary SIS and CIS
products in which the value of client assets rose to
US$1.4 billion.
Operating expenses of US$355 million were
10 per cent higher than in 2005. This rise was
primarily attributable to hiring front office Private
Banking staff and fee-earning staff within WTAS.
In Other, movements in the fair value of own
debt and associated swaps resulted in losses of
US$128 million in 2006, compared with profits of
US$401 million in 2005.
Business expansion led to higher transaction
volumes, which resulted in increased utilisation of
IT systems and solutions. Branch expansion, the
integration of Metris, and the launch of new products
also contributed to an 8 per cent increase in costs and
income at the group’s North American technology
centre. In hsbc.com, accrued costs associated with
the development of HSBC’s second generation
internet banking platforms were recharged to other
customer groups, which resulted in higher operating
income.
106
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
(17)
(79)
(78)
(44)
(122)
1,739
3
–
–
1,480
3,004
–
(520)
–
–
520
520
–
–
–
–
(1,404)
(1,404)
–
Total
US$m
14,847
5,810
(1,289)
747
(542)
1,750
245
105
449
360
23,024
(241)
3,004
(1,404)
22,783
–
–
(12,156)
3,004
(1,404)
10,627
(1,496)
1,508
–
1,508
%
6.3
49.8
1,404
(10,556)
–
–
–
71
20
91
%
0.4
46.3
US$m
289,860
510,092
145,173
North America
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
13,175
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
4,571
1,558
338
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income/
(expense) ................................
(349)
134
(215)
–
176
47
449
(5)
(2)
–
(2)
–
(1)
1
–
88
Total operating income ............
18,198
1,982
Net insurance claims6 .................
(241)
–
Net operating income4 ..............
17,957
1,982
Loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions .....
(11,909)
Net operating income ...............
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) ..............
6,048
(7,594)
(1,546)
Share of profit/(loss) in
associates and joint ventures ..
–
Profit/(loss) before tax ..............
(1,546)
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
%
(6.4)
42.3
(191)
1,791
(893)
898
22
920
%
3.8
45.1
378
701
(871)
137
(734)
11
65
57
–
167
645
–
645
(46)
599
(1,562)
(963)
(2)
(965)
%
(4.0)
242.2
273
279
11
–
11
–
2
–
–
34
599
–
599
(10)
589
(415)
174
–
174
%
0.7
69.3
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant
to Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments16 ......................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
218,676
240,734
61,824
38,930
43,920
36,306
26,186
217,808
30,732
6,068
6,541
16,187
–
1,089
124
14,938
126,669
14,825
107
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
North America > Profit/loss before tax by customer group
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business (continued)
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
212
240
12
–
12
–
9
–
–
31
504
–
504
(35)
469
(355)
114
–
114
%
0.5
70.4
(52)
(134)
(220)
(23)
(243)
(484)
–
–
484
484
(52)
–
4
–
–
1,536
1,059
–
–
–
–
(1,271)
(1,271)
–
–
–
–
(217)
–
(217)
%
(1.0)
120.4
1,059
(1,271)
21,627
(1)
–
1,058
(1,271)
(6,796)
14,831
(1,275)
1,271
(10,193)
Total
US$m
14,268
4,766
617
741
1,358
(63)
58
85
492
922
21,886
(259)
4,638
30
4,668
%
21.1
47.1
US$m
277,987
511,190
120,922
North America
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
12,964
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
3,675
1,362
329
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense)5 ...
Net expense from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
66
208
274
–
14
23
492
270
13
–
13
–
19
1
–
87
266
656
746
72
818
(11)
12
61
–
269
Total operating income ...............
17,712
1,811
2,071
Net insurance claims6 .................
(259)
–
–
Net operating income4 ................
17,453
1,811
2,071
Loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions .....
Net operating income .................
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit/(loss) ................
Share of profit/(loss) in
associates and joint ventures ..
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant
to Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments16 ......................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
(6,683)
10,770
(7,379)
3,391
–
3,391
%
15.4
42.3
(74)
1,737
(814)
923
34
957
%
4.3
44.9
(3)
2,068
(1,641)
427
(4)
423
%
1.9
79.2
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
220,517
250,985
54,099
34,651
43,012
31,066
17,215
208,958
23,711
5,604
6,558
11,938
–
1,677
108
15,862
136,141
9,664
108
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
(230)
–
–
230
230
–
–
–
–
(1,170)
(1,170)
–
Total
US$m
13,295
3,952
250
635
885
434
47
41
477
642
19,773
(232)
(114)
(158)
22
(21)
1
402
1
–
(1)
1,280
1,411
–
1,411
(1,170)
19,541
(4)
–
1,407
(1,170)
(1,251)
1,170
–
–
–
156
9
165
%
0.8
88.7
(4,916)
14,625
(8,758)
5,867
48
5,915
%
28.2
44.8
US$m
252,560
432,490
111,386
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
North America
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income5 ....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
11,636
3,050
1,157
283
119
210
329
10
(12)
8
478
232
7
(4)
3
–
1
–
–
87
661
577
95
221
316
23
57
33
–
179
Total operating income ...............
15,731
1,531
1,846
Net insurance claims6 .................
(232)
–
–
Net operating income4 ................
15,499
1,531
1,846
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
(5,001)
Net operating income .................
10,498
Total operating expenses ............
(6,317)
Operating profit ..........................
4,181
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ..........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
–
4,181
%
19.9
40.8
21
1,552
(660)
892
–
892
%
4.3
43.1
64
1,910
(1,376)
534
39
573
%
2.7
74.5
185
200
7
(1)
6
(1)
–
–
–
34
424
–
424
4
428
(324)
104
–
104
%
0.5
76.4
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant
to Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments16 ......................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
207,598
240,474
44,769
29,666
36,570
25,585
10,381
149,623
31,442
4,915
5,823
9,589
–
–
1
9,979
102,732
7,506
109
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > Profit/(loss) before tax
Latin America
Profit/(loss) before tax by country within customer groups and global businesses
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
Year ended 31 December 2007
Mexico ..............................................................
Brazil .................................................................
Argentina ..........................................................
Panama ..............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year ended 31 December 2006
Mexico ..............................................................
Brazil .................................................................
Argentina ..........................................................
Panama ..............................................................
Other .................................................................
Year ended 31 December 2005
Mexico ..............................................................
Brazil .................................................................
Argentina ..........................................................
Panama ..............................................................
Other .................................................................
514
293
36
45
5
893
628
121
35
16
–
800
570
167
37
10
2
786
333
286
75
18
28
740
197
185
51
13
5
451
161
147
35
11
3
357
113
297
90
16
1
517
177
218
68
10
2
475
192
95
56
9
(5)
347
11
9
–
7
(2)
25
7
6
–
–
1
14
–
1
–
–
–
1
9
(6)
–
–
–
3
–
(4)
3
–
(4)
(5)
–
(4)
116
–
1
113
Loans and advances to customers (net) by country
Mexico .............................................................................................................
Brazil ................................................................................................................
Argentina .........................................................................................................
Panama .............................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Customer accounts by country
Mexico .............................................................................................................
Brazil ................................................................................................................
Argentina .........................................................................................................
Panama .............................................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
18,059
18,491
2,485
4,158
4,730
47,923
2007
US$m
22,307
26,231
2,779
5,062
4,913
61,292
At 31 December
2006
US$m
14,294
11,469
1,912
4,178
3,938
35,791
At 31 December
2006
US$m
19,775
19,946
2,470
5,031
3,639
50,861
980
879
201
86
32
2,178
1,009
526
157
39
4
1,735
923
406
244
30
1
1,604
2005
US$m
11,242
7,975
1,077
1,135
252
21,681
2005
US$m
13,226
14,847
1,239
1,217
460
30,989
110
Profit before tax
Latin America
Net interest income ..........................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Net trading income ..........................................................................................
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ....................
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Gains arising from dilution of interests in associates ......................................
Dividend income ..............................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
Total operating income .................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders .
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ................................................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .............................
Net operating income ....................................................................................
Total operating expenses .................................................................................
Operating profit .............................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...............................................
Profit before tax .............................................................................................
Share of HSBC’s profit before tax ..................................................................
Cost efficiency ratio ........................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
5,576
2,153
548
320
253
11
9
1,594
228
10,692
(1,427)
9,265
(1,697)
7,568
(5,402)
2,166
12
2,178
%
9.0
58.3
2006
US$m
4,197
1,630
537
237
84
–
6
1,076
91
7,858
(1,023)
6,835
(938)
5,897
(4,166)
1,731
4
1,735
%
7.9
61.0
2005
US$m
3,342
1,191
537
186
80
–
5
871
286
6,498
(792)
5,706
(676)
5,030
(3,426)
1,604
–
1,604
%
7.7
60.0
Year-end staff numbers (full-time equivalent) ................................................
64,404
64,900
55,600
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to customers (net) ...........................................................
Loans and advances to banks (net) ..................................................................
Trading assets, financial instruments designated at fair value, and
financial investments ...................................................................................
Total assets ......................................................................................................
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
For footnote, see page 130.
2007
US$m
47,923
12,675
24,715
99,056
4,092
61,292
At 31 December
2006
US$m
35,791
12,634
20,497
80,771
5,267
50,861
2005
US$m
21,681
8,964
16,945
55,387
2,598
30,989
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Economic briefing
In response to fluctuations in export demand from
the US, economic growth in Mexico moderated
during the course of 2007, with GDP rising an
estimated 3.1 per cent during the year, compared
with 4.8 per cent in 2006. Inflationary pressures
remained significant throughout 2007, with
consumer price inflation averaging 4 per cent, driven
by increases in international prices of commodities,
which affected domestic food prices in the core
index. As a result, the Bank of Mexico raised its
overnight interest rate by a total of 50 basis points,
and has maintained its restrictive monetary policy
despite reductions in interest rates by the US Federal
Reserve.
The Brazilian economy expanded strongly in
2007, with GDP expected to have grown by 5.4 per
cent compared with 3.7 per cent in 2006. As in 2006,
growth was driven by domestic demand, with private
consumption rising considerably. As a consequence,
the average unemployment rate fell to 9.3 per cent in
2007 from 10 per cent in 2006. After declining to
3.1 per cent at the end of 2006, the annual rate of
111
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > 2007
consumer price inflation climbed to 4.5 per cent by
December 2007, mainly from higher food prices.
The cycle of monetary easing which began in the
third quarter of 2005 paused in October 2007 with
the overnight rate at 11.25 per cent, the lowest level
in several decades. After nine years of steady
expansion, the trade balance surplus fell slightly in
2007, and is expected to decrease further in 2008.
Balance of payments fundamentals, however,
remained robust and, as a result, the Brazilian
economy seemed less vulnerable to external shocks
than in previous years.
The Argentine economy also performed
strongly in 2007, with GDP expected to have risen
by 8.7 per cent. This strength was a consequence of
several factors such as a competitive exchange rate,
spare capacity in the economy and a generally
favourable external environment, which helped
Argentina extend its fiscal and external surpluses
into a fourth successive year. Less encouraging was
the fact that inflation accelerated to about 13 per
cent, up from 10 per cent in 2006. Although food
inflation was part of the explanation, rapid demand
growth was also a factor. 2007 was an election year,
and as a result the rate of growth of fiscal spending
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
doubled to 45 per cent on an annual basis. As a
consequence, the primary surplus fell by around
1.2 per cent of GDP.
Throughout the region as a whole, GDP growth
roughly matched that of 2006. The slowdown in
Mexico provided a contrast to better performances
elsewhere in Central and Southern America. Central
America grew by an estimated 6.3 per cent, up from
5.9 per cent in 2006 while, in South America, growth
was an estimated 5.8 per cent, up from 5.3 per cent
in 2006. The most dynamic economies in Central
America were Panama (10.0 per cent growth in
GDP) and the Dominican Republic (8.0 per cent),
followed by Costa Rica (6.2 per cent) and Honduras
(6.2 per cent). In South America, the fastest growing
countries after Argentina were Peru (7.2 per cent
growth in GDP), Venezuela (7.0 per cent) and
Colombia (6.5 per cent). In general, inflation appears
to be under control in Latin America, averaging
around 5 per cent over the past three years. Only
Venezuela and Argentina have experienced double-
digit inflation, while the US dollar-based economies
of Panama, Ecuador and El Salvador have better
inflationary records.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared with year ended 31 December 2006
2006
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2006
at 2007
exchange
rates
US$m
Acquisitions,
disposals
and dilution
gains2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2007
as
reported
Reported
change
US$m
%
Underlying
change
%
Latin America
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 ...
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ....
4,197
1,630
1,008
6,835
(938)
5,897
261
86
60
407
(81)
326
4,458
1,716
1,068
7,242
(1,019)
6,223
Operating expenses ..........
(4,166)
(258)
(4,424)
Operating profit .............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax .............
1,731
4
1,735
68
–
68
1,799
4
1,803
For footnotes, see page 130.
Review of business performance
HSBC’s operations in Latin America reported a
pre-tax profit of US$2.2 billion compared with
US$1.7 billion in 2006, representing an increase of
26 per cent. HSBC’s acquisitions of HSBC Bank
Panama and Banca Nazionale in 2006 strengthened
the existing business platform and geographical
representation, and 2007 has been a year of
112
375
86
102
563
(133)
430
(320)
110
9
119
743
351
366
1,460
(545)
915
(658)
257
(1)
256
5,576
2,153
1,536
9,265
(1,697)
7,568
(5,402)
2,166
12
2,178
33
32
52
36
(81)
28
(30)
25
200
26
17
20
34
20
(53)
15
(15)
14
(25)
14
integrating these operations into HSBC. On an
underlying basis, pre-tax profits rose by 14 per cent
as increased revenues were partly offset by higher
loan impairment charges, largely from Mexico, and
increased operating costs across the region.
Both Mexico and Brazil made notable
contributions to Commercial Banking’s pre-tax
profits, which were 64 per cent higher than in 2006,
Brazil from SMEs, Mexico from larger corporates.
In Personal Financial Services, profit before tax
increased by 12 per cent as strong growth in revenues
was partly offset by increased loan impairment
charges in Mexico. Profit before tax in Global
Banking and Markets increased as strong growth in
net fee and net interest income was partly offset by a
decrease in trading income and higher costs related to
business expansion.
Notwithstanding continuing investment and
integration costs throughout the region, the cost
efficiency ratio improved by 2.7 percentage points to
58.3 per cent.
The following commentary is on an underlying
basis.
Personal Financial Services reported pre-tax
profits of US$893 million, 3 per cent higher than in
2006, as strong growth in revenues across the region
was partly offset by increased loan impairment
charges arising from the seasoning of recent organic
business expansion, mainly in Mexico. Revenue rose
by 21 per cent, driven by higher credit card balances
in Mexico and an increased volume of personal and
vehicle finance loans in Brazil. Four additional
months of Banca Nazionale revenues in Argentina, a
one-off adjustment to insurance embedded value in
Mexico and gains from sales of financial investments
in Brazil, also helped boost income. Loan impairment
charges in Mexico rose significantly, driven by the
growth in the past two years of the credit card
portfolio and higher delinquencies in the self-
employed lending business. Operating expenses
increased by 12 per cent, mainly supporting
expansion in the region; despite this, the cost
efficiency ratio improved by 4.7 percentage points.
Net interest income rose by 15 per cent, as
steady asset and liability growth was recorded across
the region.
In Mexico, net interest income rose by 27 per
cent, driven by a strong performance in both asset
and liability products. Credit cards, an area in which
HSBC has worked to remedy its traditionally
underweight position in Mexico, reached a
market share of more than 10 per cent, up
3.5 percentage points compared with 2006. This
reflected HSBC’s efforts to organically grow this
portfolio. Growth was enhanced by marketing
promotions and portfolio management programmes
put in place to improve customer retention and card
usage.
Demand for housing remained strong and
mortgage lending continued to grow. HSBC’s
mortgage positioning is based on speed of service and
113
competitive rates supported by marketing campaigns.
HSBC Premier was relaunched in Mexico in 2007
and performed well, increasing cross-sales and
income during the year.
On the liabilities side of the balance sheet, both
term and demand deposits registered growth in line
with market conditions. Overall spreads on Mexican
peso-denominated accounts remained relatively
stable while spreads on accounts in US dollars
narrowed by 141 basis points.
In Brazil, net interest income increased by
7 per cent, as growth in private consumption fuelled
a rise in loan volumes. Average customer loans were
28 per cent higher than in 2006. Customer deposits
were 23 per cent higher, driven by a sales effort to
garner deposits and the favourable economic outlook.
Spreads on customer deposits narrowed by 23 basis
points.
The vehicle finance loan portfolio grew
significantly in the positive economic environment,
while spreads narrowed due to competitive pressures.
Net interest income on payroll loans grew as volumes
expanded. Demand for personal instalment loans also
continued to rise, driving net interest income higher
on wider spreads.
Net interest income rose by 35 per cent in
Argentina, as customer balances grew strongly and
four additional months of Banca Nazionale revenues
were included. Growth in customer lending reflected
expansion in personal loans, car loans and credit
cards, supported by cross-selling initiatives and an
active marketing campaign. Customer liabilities
increased mainly in demand and term deposit
products.
Net fee income was 19 per cent higher, primarily
from robust business growth across the region.
In Mexico, fee income grew by 35 per cent with
the rapidly growing credit card customer base and
continued sales of the Tu Cuenta packaged product
the main contributors. Cards in force increased by
35 per cent, ATM cash withdrawals by 54 per cent
and point of sale billing by 84 per cent during the
year, all positively affecting commission income.
Stricter guidelines on the imposition of late payment
fees also led to higher income. Fees from Tu Cuenta
rose strongly, following a 29 per cent growth in the
number of accounts. A 6 per cent growth in the ATM
network and increased customer activity led to a rise
in HSBC’s market share in interbank transactions of
more than 12 million transactions or 2 percentage
points to 38 per cent, resulting in higher interbank
fee income.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > 2007
In Brazil, fee income rose by 3 per cent on
Loan impairment charges rose only modestly
the back of growth in lending balances and a
commensurate rise in credit facility fees. Fee
income further benefited from re-pricing initiatives,
particularly in current account fees.
Fee income in Argentina, higher by 12 per cent,
primarily reflected an extra four months of Banca
Nazionale revenues. Business growth in
bancassurance and credit cards also contributed
to improved fees.
The continued growth of insurance operations in
the region, through increased product offerings and
expanded distribution channels, led to higher
insurance premiums and claims.
In Mexico, increased cross-selling activities in
the branch network resulted in higher net insurance
income, mainly driven by sales of a five-year life
assurance product. Refinement of the recognition
methodology used in respect of the PVIF long-term
insurance contracts resulted in a one-off revenue
increment in the first half of 2007.
In Brazil, income grew from higher sales
volumes of pension and life assurance products. The
growth in the life portfolio was driven by growth of
106 per cent in credit insurance products. Pension
portfolio income grew by 48 per cent following
targeted sales initiatives. Net insurance claims also
grew substantially during the year. Increased
premium income in Argentina was generated from
higher sales volumes of general insurance and life
protection policies, supported by innovative
marketing campaigns.
Net gains from financial investments increased
significantly, driven by a gain of US$97 million,
following a sale of shares held in a credit bureau, a
stock exchange and a derivatives exchange in Brazil.
Loan impairment charges rose by 70 per cent
to US$1.5 billion, mainly due to higher delinquency
from seasoned loan growth in Mexico.
Mexico reported a more than threefold increase
in loan impairment charges to US$737 million,
driven by higher impairments on credit cards
following the targeted expansion in market share, and
higher delinquencies from self-employed loan
balances. The increase in loan impairment charge is
part of the cost of building strong organic growth as
portfolios season. Regular reviews are undertaken to
improve the quality of new business, based on
underwriting experience, improved collection
strategies and better managed customer acquisition
channels. Credit models were updated during 2007 to
adjust to credit behaviour in underlying portfolios.
in Brazil, notwithstanding strong asset growth,
reflecting the benign credit environment and the
application of proactive risk management techniques.
Increased loan impairment charges from the vehicle
finance, cards, payroll loans and store loans
portfolios were partially offset by lower loan
impairment charges in overdrafts and personal loans.
In Argentina, loan impairment charges grew by
US$14 million, again mainly due to the inclusion of
the Banca Nazionale portfolio, as well as organic
loan growth.
Operating expenses of US$3.8 billion were
12 per cent higher, mainly because of activities
undertaken in support of product and distribution
expansion initiatives, and integrating recent
acquisitions.
In Mexico, operating expenses increased by
14 per cent, as non-staff costs rose to support organic
business growth. Staff costs were flat as increases to
support business growth, mainly in debt collection
and call centres, were offset by one-off curtailment
and settlement gains from staff transferring out of the
bank’s defined benefit healthcare scheme to a new
defined contribution scheme. Growth in non-staff
costs was mainly attributable to supporting credit
card business growth and servicing, strengthening of
IT infrastructure and higher marketing spend on
product campaigns, promotions and sponsorships.
Campaigns included the HSBC Premier relaunch,
Tu Cuenta and insurance. The increased popularity of
the cash-back facility on the Tu Cuenta account,
where a customer receives a rebate on amounts spent
by credit or debit cards, also drove up expenses.
In Brazil, operating expenses were 8 per cent
higher. Staff costs included one-off expenditure
incurred to enable the business to improve
operational efficiencies and position itself for future
growth. Union-agreed pay rises took effect during
2007. Non-staff expenses, including marketing
campaigns, payroll acquisition costs and transactional
taxes also increased in support of revenue growth.
Costs in Argentina rose by 39 per cent, mainly
from the inclusion of four extra months of Banca
Nazionale costs. The rise in expenses reflected both
continued investment in infrastructure to support
business growth, and general price rises evident in
the economy as inflation rose. Increased marketing
campaign spending was focused on cards, personal
loans and the Premier relaunch.
Commercial Banking pre-tax profits rose by
46 per cent to US$740 million during 2007, mainly
driven by significant growth in Brazil and Mexico.
114
HSBC’s two-pronged objective to become the
leading international bank and the best bank for small
businesses delivered results as regional customer
numbers grew by over 14 per cent. Income from
payments and cash management rose by 8 per cent,
while the network of International Banking Centres
in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico was extended to
improve regional coverage. Other developments
included the launch of electronic account opening
facilities in Mexico and BusinessDirect in Brazil.
Operating income showed an improvement on
2006, although this was partly offset by an increase
in costs driven by expansion. As a result, the cost
efficiency ratio improved by 0.4 percentage points to
54.3 per cent.
Net interest income rose by 17 per cent, mainly
from an increase in both deposits and loans.
In Mexico, net interest income rose by 21 per
cent to US$496 million, reflecting volume growth in
deposits, commercial real estate lending, increased
support for larger local and global commercial
customers and strong volume growth in trade and
factoring. Average lending balances rose by 37 per
cent, primarily on large corporates, while spreads
widened on small business loans. Spreads on deposit
accounts narrowed. Customer relationship
management campaigns resulted in new customer
acquisition and increased cross-sales to existing
customers.
In Brazil, net interest income increased by
10 per cent, mainly due to higher income from small
and mid-market enterprises in the favourable
economic environment. Increases in volumes were
notable in the guaranteed account, giro facil, working
capital facilities and rural loans.
Net interest income increased by 86 per cent
in Argentina, due both to strong organic loan and
deposit growth, and the inclusion of four additional
months of Banca Nazionale revenues. Corporate and
mid-market business grew significantly, reflecting
the successful integration of the Banca Nazionale
network, while the targeting of small and micro
enterprises coupled with the launching of new
products also helped drive portfolio growth.
Customer loans and advances rose by 50 per cent
while customer deposits increased by 33 per cent.
Net fee income was 14 per cent higher, driven
by robust growth throughout the region.
In Mexico, fee income grew by 13 per cent
across a broad product portfolio. Following a strategy
to migrate more transactions to internet-based
services, payment and cash management transactions
increased by 11 per cent and active customers by
115
19 per cent, resulting in higher income generation. A
growth in the number of ATMs led to higher income
from ATM interbank charges. Increased use of credit
cards at point of sale also increased fee income. Trust
fees increased significantly, mainly due to market
share gains in the structured products market. Growth
in trade services was driven by the Group’s
geographical presence and enhanced product
capabilities, as market share and cross-selling
activities increased. International factoring was also
successfully launched during 2007.
In Brazil, fee income rose by 11 per cent, mainly
on small and micro enterprises. Payments and cash
management income increased, mainly on higher
volumes. Current account income increased as a
result of a re-pricing exercise and a rise in volumes.
Fees from loans and funds under management also
grew on higher volumes. More than 110,000 products
were sold over e-channels, a significant increase on
the previous year.
In Argentina, HSBC increased fee income by
48 per cent, primarily due to an additional four
months of Banca Nazionale revenues combined with
higher transaction volumes. The main product drivers
behind the increase were current accounts, which rose
by 38 per cent, and trade services, which grew by
39 per cent on higher volumes, placing HSBC among
the top three banks in imports and exports
in Argentina.
Trading income rose on the back of higher
volumes of foreign exchange transactions and sales
of treasury products in Brazil, which reflected higher
market share and favourable market conditions.
Foreign exchange trading income also increased in
Argentina.
Net gains from financial investments rose by
US$47 million, driven by a gain of US$45 million
following a sale of shares held in a credit bureau, a
stock exchange and a derivatives exchange in Brazil.
Loan impairment charges were 28 per cent lower
at US$212 million.
In Mexico, HSBC recorded a net decrease in
loan impairment charges as increased delinquency
rates in the small and medium-sized business
portfolios were offset by impairment allowance
releases. Regular reviews aimed at strengthening
consumer credit management and collections were
put in place to better manage delinquency rates as the
portfolio matures. Credit models were updated during
2007 to adjust to credit behaviour in underlying
portfolios. Products with high credit losses were
discontinued or restructured.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > 2007 / 2006
Loan impairment charges rose by 4 per cent in
Net fee income rose by 34 per cent to
Brazil despite a substantial growth in assets. This
improved performance was mainly attributable to the
small business segment and resulted from changes to
credit initiation and collection strategies implemented
during the year. In Argentina, HSBC reported a net
release of loan impairment allowances following an
improvement in the country’s economic performance
during 2007 and increased collections of non-
performing loans.
In line with Group strategy to expand in fast
growing economies, operating expenses in the Latin
America region rose by 21 per cent to US$1.1 billion.
In Mexico, operating expenses increased by
22 per cent, largely driven by higher transaction
costs. Staff cost rises reflected an increase in
salary and performance awards in line with profit
generation. Growth in non-staff costs was attributable
to higher marketing expenditure and a rise in
transaction costs from increased business volumes.
In Brazil, operating expenses rose by 15 per cent
following implementation of a union agreement on
staff remuneration and one-off expenses incurred to
improve future operational efficiencies. Non-staff
costs, including transactional taxes, increased broadly
in line with business expansion and revenue growth.
In Argentina, costs rose by 53 per cent, again
mainly driven by the inclusion of four extra months
of Banca Nazionale costs. Excluding this, expenses
rose reflecting continued investment in support of
business growth and the general price increase
evident in the local market.
Global Banking and Markets in Latin America
reported a pre-tax profit of US$517 million, which
represented an increase of 1 per cent from 2006.
Robust growth in net interest income and fees was
partially offset by a decrease in trading income
and an increase in costs relating to regional business
expansion. Overall, this led to a deterioration in the
cost efficiency ratio to 48.9 per cent.
Total operating income increased by 13 per cent
to US$1.0 billion. This was chiefly driven by strong
revenue growth in Brazil, which more than offset
reduced trading income in Mexico, in comparison
with the latter’s strong performance in 2006.
Net interest income increased by 13 per cent,
driven by cross-referrals from Commercial Banking
and an increased volume of deposit balances in the
securities services business as the strong performance
of Brazilian equity markets attracted foreign buyers.
In Argentina, net interest income rose through an
additional contribution from Banca Nazionale and
higher spreads on customer loans.
116
US$250 million, driven by a strong performance in
Brazil. HSBC Global Asset Management revenues
increased as a result of strong returns from funds with
performance fees and the success of selling locally
manufactured products into Asian markets. Increased
IPO activity in Brazil boosted fees from financing
and capital markets, both from advisory services and
from underwriting new listings. Securities services
also performed well in the region as new business
volumes and strong local equity markets drove a
63 per cent increase in assets under custody.
Net income from trading activities decreased
by 14 per cent to US$182 million, driven by
performance in Mexico, where there were reduced
revenue opportunities in Credit and Rates due to the
relatively flat yield curve. This was partly offset by
income growth from foreign exchange trading, driven
by continuing market volatility.
Gains less losses from financial investments
increased by 10 per cent, driven by a gain of
US$46 million following a sale of shares held in
a credit bureau, a stock exchange and a derivatives
exchange in Brazil. These were partially offset by
a lower level of disposals in Mexico in 2007.
There were continued but lower impairment
releases, with a small number of significant releases
in Argentina relating to impairments that arose during
the 2001 debt crisis offsetting the non-recurrence of a
large release in 2006 in Mexico.
Operating expenses increased by 23 per cent to
US$481 million, and reflected HSBC’s investment in
increasing operational capabilities in Brazil, cost
growth in Argentina following the inclusion of Banca
Nazionale and continued investment in infrastructure
to support business growth. This caused the cost
efficiency ratio to deteriorate by 4.1 percentage
points.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit of
US$25 million, an increase of 47 per cent. The cost
efficiency ratio improved by one percentage point
to 64.8 per cent. The upward trend in cross-referrals
continued, particularly in Brazil, with inward
referrals contributing US$495 million to total
client assets.
Overall, revenues increased by 42 per cent to
US$71 million, driven by Mexico and Brazil. In
Mexico, balance sheet growth and brokerage fees
drove revenues up. Higher investment in funds and
cross-referrals in Brazil also contributed to the rise in
fee income.
Client assets grew by 62 per cent to
US$11.6 billion, of which US$1.8 billion represented
net new money. The increase in net new money was
driven by the acquisition of new clients, particularly
in Brazil and Mexico, improved product offerings
and cross-referrals from other customer groups in
Brazil.
Operating expenses increased by 40 per cent to
US$46 million to support business expansion,
particularly in Brazil, and to create a platform for
future growth in the region.
Profit before tax of US$3 million was reported
within Other.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Economic briefing
Mexico’s GDP growth improved significantly in
2006 to 4.8 per cent from 3.0 per cent in 2005, mostly
in response to increased external demand from the
US. Commercial bank credit continued to recover
strongly, with over 80 per cent growth in real
mortgage loans. By the end of 2006, headline
inflation had increased to 3.8 per cent from 3.0 per
cent earlier in the year, largely as a result of increases
in agricultural supply prices. Record oil revenues,
combined with high non-oil export growth and
increasing inward remittances from Mexicans
working outside the country produced an almost
balanced current account for the year. Significant
capital inflows, including an estimated US$18 billion
in foreign direct investment, enabled the Government
to reduce its external debt by more than
US$12 billion and the Bank of Mexico to increase
foreign exchange reserves.
In Brazil, GDP is expected to have grown by
2.6 per cent in 2006 compared with 2.3 per cent in
2005. Growth was driven by domestic demand, with
private consumption increasing by 3.8 per cent and
capital spending by 5.9 per cent. Net exports, by
contrast, fell by 18 per cent in the first three quarters
of the year compared with the same period in
2005, as the increase in domestic demand translated
into higher imports rather than an expansion of
output. The unemployment rate averaged 10.0 per
cent in 2006, slightly up from 9.8 per cent averaged
in 2005. Inflation continued to decline, to 3.1 per cent
in 2006, compared with 5.7 per cent in 2005 and, as a
result, the Central Bank continued to ease monetary
policy. Overnight rates fell to 13.25 per cent in
December 2006 from 17.25 per cent a year before.
The trade balance continued to be robust, with a
surplus of US$46.1 billion in 2006, just above the
amount achieved in 2005.
In Argentina, real GDP growth in 2006
exceeded 8.3 per cent and, after growing for four
consecutive years at an average rate of approximately
9 per cent, the country’s GDP was nearly 15 per cent
above 1998, when its recession began. The strong
growth was due to a competitive exchange rate, a
strong fiscal stance and a favourable business
environment, which HSBC expects to continue in
2007. The main potential constraint on growth
remains the risk of disruption in energy supply,
where there has been a lack of investment and limited
price adjustments for residential consumers since
2001/2. Inflation was approximately 10 per cent at
the end of 2006, having tripled in the past three years,
though it was below its peak of more than 12 per cent
in 2005. Interest rates rose steadily in 2006 and the
peso weakened slightly against the US dollar. Given
Argentina’s higher inflation rate, however, the
exchange rate appreciated in real terms.
Review of business performance
HSBC’s operations in Latin America reported a
pre-tax profit of US$1.7 billion compared
with US$1.6 billion in 2005, an increase of
8 per cent. On an underlying basis, pre-tax profits
rose by 5 per cent. Growth in profitability was
constrained by the non-recurrence of one-off
coverage bond receipts and other items related to the
2001 sovereign debt default and subsequent
pesification in Argentina, which added
US$122 million to 2005 profits. In addition, a gain
of US$89 million from the sale of the property and
casualty insurance business, HSBC Seguros de
Automoveis e Bens Limitada, to HDI Seguros S.A.,
was recorded in 2005. Excluding these prior year
profits, and on an underlying basis, profit before tax
increased by 21 per cent, with net operating income
increasing by 15 per cent and operating expenses by
12 per cent. Global Banking and Markets delivered a
strong performance, driven by growth in fee and
trading income, with notable success in bringing
Latin American borrowers to global capital markets.
Commercial Banking also grew well as domestic
economies expanded. During 2006, HSBC made two
significant acquisitions in the region. In May, HSBC
acquired the Argentine banking operations of Banca
Nazionale to build its distribution capabilities and, in
November, HSBC Bank Panama in Central America,
adding markets in five countries new to the Group.
117
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > 2006
Reconciliation of reported and underlying profit before tax
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared with year ended 31 December 2005
2005
as
reported
US$m
Currency
translation1
US$m
2005
at 2006
exchange
rates
US$m
Acqui-
sitions and
disposals2
US$m
Underlying
change
US$m
2006
as
reported
US$m
Latin America
Net interest income ..........
Net fee income .................
Other income3 ..................
Net operating income4 .....
Loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ....................
Net operating income ......
3,342
1,191
1,173
5,706
(676)
5,030
165
53
56
274
(63)
211
3,507
1,244
1,229
5,980
(739)
5,241
Operating expenses ..........
(3,426)
(196)
(3,622)
Operating profit ...............
Income from associates ...
Profit before tax ...............
1,604
–
1,604
15
–
15
1,619
–
1,619
For footnotes, see page 130.
The following commentary is on an underlying
basis.
Personal Financial Services reported a pre-tax
profit of US$800 million, a rise of 1 per cent over
2005, which had benefited from a US$89 million
gain on the sale of the Group’s property and casualty
insurance business in Brazil. Adjusting for this, pre-
tax profits grew by 16 per cent, driven by 12 per cent
growth in revenues and 10 per cent growth in costs.
The underlying improvement in revenues was led by
strong asset and deposit growth together with higher
fee income, offset in part by consequential expense
growth and a rise in impairment charges as the loan
book both grew and seasoned.
In Mexico, profit before tax rose by 10 per cent.
During 2006, 56,000 Personal Financial Services
customers were transferred to the Commercial
Banking customer group, where HSBC is better
placed to meet their banking requirements. Adjusting
for this, profits were 20 per cent higher, driven by
strong balance sheet growth and improved fee
income.
Adjusting for the gain in 2005 from the sale of
the property and casualty business, pre-tax profits
were 46 per cent higher in Brazil. The strong
domestic economy stimulated robust growth in
lending and a rise in the number of current account
holders. During the year, a new and innovative
internet banking service Meu HSBC (My HSBC) was
introduced to Personal Financial Services customers,
allowing them to conduct different types of
transactions online using the same password as
their ATM card.
118
77
38
25
140
(18)
122
(92)
30
4
34
613
348
(246)
715
(181)
534
(452)
82
–
82
4,197
1,630
1,008
6,835
(938)
5,897
(4,166)
1,731
4
1,735
Reported
change
%
26
37
(14)
20
(39)
17
(22)
8
–
8
Underlying
change
%
17
28
(20)
12
(24)
10
(12)
5
–
5
In Argentina, profit before tax was marginally
higher, with strong balance sheet growth, higher fees
and improved revenues from the insurance business.
This was largely offset by increased loan impairment
charges and cost growth incurred in support of
business expansion as HSBC prepared for an
improving domestic economic environment.
Net interest income rose by 11 per cent to
US$3.1 billion, largely from balance sheet growth
partly offset by lower deposit spreads.
In Mexico, net interest income increased by
12 per cent to US$1.2 billion. Adjusting for the effect
of customer account transfers to Commercial
Banking, net interest income rose by 20 per cent,
driven by strong growth in credit card and mortgage
balances and increases in deposits which were
generated by the ongoing success of the Tu Cuenta
product. Overall, asset spreads improved as the
relative increase in higher margin card balances led to
a favourable change in the product mix. By contrast,
deposit spreads narrowed as interest rates declined.
Excluding customer account transfers, average
deposit balances in Mexico rose by 10 per cent.
HSBC continued to be one of the market leaders with
respect to balance growth, despite fierce competition
from other banks, improving its market share by
35 basis points. A strong increase in low-cost
deposits was reflective of the continuing success of
Tu Cuenta, the first integrated financial services
product of its kind offered locally, with nearly
400,000 new accounts opened in 2006. HSBC
Premier performed well as 84,000 new customers
were added during the year. Premier deposits
represented over one third of the total personal
deposit base at 31 December 2006. The income
benefit from higher deposit balances was partly
mitigated by reduced spreads in the falling interest
rate environment, notwithstanding the positive shift
in mix from growth in non-interest bearing deposit
balances.
The credit card market in Mexico was buoyant
in 2006 and HSBC’s business performed very
successfully with average balances doubling to
US$886 million. Various initiatives were
implemented to develop the business, most notably
cross-sales to Tu Cuenta customers, targeted
customer relationship campaigns to existing clients,
successful portfolio management strategies and
promotions, development of new sales channels and
improvements in card activation times. These
initiatives helped HSBC become the market leader in
credit card balance growth, improving market share
by 2.3 per cent. The number of cards in circulation
reached 1.7 million at the year end, representing an
increase of 76 per cent.
Demand for housing from first time buyers
remained strong in Mexico, and market conditions
continued to be highly competitive. Average
mortgage balances rose by 81 per cent to
US$969 million, reflecting HSBC’s competitive
pricing and innovation in product design. HSBC was
the first bank in Mexico to market pre-approved
online mortgages, and enhanced this offering with the
subsequent introduction of Mortgage Express
Approval, which provides customers with much
faster access to details concerning the loan amount,
duration and monthly payments at the point of
application. Improvements in the processing of
mortgage applications, upgraded customer service
and increased marketing activity also contributed to
the rise in lending balances. The income benefits of
balance growth were partly offset by narrower
spreads, driven by the highly competitive market
conditions.
As the Mexican economy grew strongly, there
was robust growth in personal and payroll lending
balances. The introduction of a dedicated and mobile
sales force during the second half of 2006 to expand
distribution capabilities led to a fourfold increase in
average personal lending balances during the year.
This initiative also helped to reduce time to market,
increase cross-sales and, through closer interaction
with the branch network, improve client coverage.
The popularity of the personal loan product, where
customers apply directly via HSBC’s extensive and
well-positioned ATM network grew, and this was the
key driver behind a 37 per cent rise in average payroll
loan balances.
119
In Brazil, net interest income increased by 9 per
cent as lower inflation and the improving domestic
economy triggered a rise in demand for credit which,
in turn, contributed to strong lending growth.
Average loan balances were 18 per cent higher,
driven by rising customer numbers and increases in
vehicle financing, pension and payroll loans. On the
liability side, there was a 7 per cent rise in current
account holders, largely driven by growth in the
number of customers with payroll loans and greater
levels of sales activity.
Average vehicle finance balances in Brazil rose
by 36 per cent, led by continued portfolio growth as
HSBC strengthened its relationships with car
dealerships. The combined pension and payroll loan
portfolios registered an 84 per cent increase in
average balances, a consequence of increased
borrowings per customer, portfolio acquisitions, and
growing customer demand for these products.
Spreads also improved, largely as a result of lower
funding costs, which augmented the positive income
benefits of balance growth. Average card balances
rose by 19 per cent, with an increase of 27 per cent in
the number of cards in issue, reflecting the launch of
various initiatives aimed at improving retention,
activation and utilisation. Spreads improved from
lower funding costs and price increases initiated in
the second half of 2005, complementing the benefits
derived from higher lending volumes.
In Argentina, net interest income grew by 12 per
cent, primarily driven by increased demand for credit
card, other personal and motor vehicle lending. This
was largely attributable to more effective promotional
activity and productivity improvements in the
telemarketing and branch channels. Higher funding
costs, however, resulted in a narrowing of lending
spreads, offsetting volume benefits. Deposit balances
rose, reflecting the increased emphasis placed on
growing liability products, the benefit from which
was augmented by a widening of spreads.
Net fee income was 25 per cent higher, reflecting
strong growth across the region generally.
Fee income grew by 21 per cent in Mexico,
largely due to higher credit card and Tu Cuenta
income. Fee income from cards rose by 51 per cent,
reflecting a significant growth in the number of cards
in circulation and improvements made in reducing
activation times. The improvement in Tu Cuenta
income was driven by sales of over 1 million new
accounts and re-pricing initiatives. In order to capture
a higher volume of ATM revenues, HSBC added
372 new machines to its already well-positioned
network, which increased ATM fees from greater
levels of transactional activity and a 22 per cent rise
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > 2006
in transactions from non-HSBC customers. Growth in
mutual fund fees was mainly driven by higher sales
volumes and expanded product offerings in the
stronger economic environment.
Fee income in Brazil rose by 25 per cent, largely
from increased current account fees, reflecting
growth in customer numbers, greater transaction
volumes and re-pricing initiatives. Higher payroll and
vehicle balances also led to increased fees from
lending activities. In Argentina, higher credit card
fees from balance growth, re-pricing initiatives on
savings accounts, and the discontinuance of a free
current account promotion led to an improvement in
fee income.
Across the region, HSBC’s insurance businesses
continued to perform well. Sales of insurance
products in Mexico remained strong, with increased
cross-selling through the branch network of simple
insurance products together with other Personal
Financial Services products containing insurance
components. This led to a 19 per cent rise in net
premiums, mainly in respect of individual life
insurance products. In Brazil, excluding the effect of
the property and casualty insurance business sold in
2005, insurance revenues rose, largely from life and
pension products. In Argentina, increased advertising,
partnerships with established local consumer brands
and internal cross-selling initiatives led to a rise in
motor, home and extended-warranty insurance
premium income. Life and annuity premiums also
increased in line with higher customer salaries. The
‘Maxima’ pension funds business delivered higher
revenues helped by improvements in the economic
climate and greater levels of employment.
Lower other operating income reflected the non-
recurrence of profit on the sale of HSBC’s Brazilian
property and casualty insurance business.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions rose by 15 per cent to US$764 million as
lending grew and the loan book seasoned. In Mexico,
the higher charge was primarily driven by the growth
in credit card lending. In Brazil, loan impairment
charges increased modestly, driven by growth in
vehicle finance, instalment loans (credito parcelado)
and credit card lending. As the credit environment
weakened during the first half of the year, various
measures were taken to mitigate the effects. These
included tightening lending criteria, enhancing credit
analytics, revising the collection policy, prioritising
secured lending ahead of unsecured advances and
strengthening credit operations. Following
implementation of these measures, several key credit
indicators showed improvement.
120
Operating expenses rose by 10 per cent. In
Mexico, expense growth of 10 per cent was mainly
driven by increased staff costs. This largely reflected
the recruitment of 2,200 employees to improve
customer service levels in branches and grow sales.
Incentive costs increased as profits rose, and
marketing costs grew as a result of various
promotional campaigns. The continued expansion
of the branch network and ATM infrastructure,
together with the new HSBC headquarters building
in Mexico City, led to increases in IT, premises and
equipment costs.
In Brazil, expenses were 10 per cent higher. As
in Mexico, this reflected the cost of new employees
recruited to support business expansion, including the
strengthening of credit operations, and new branch
openings. This, together with annual pay rises and
increased incentive payments, triggered a 13 per cent
growth in staff costs. Advertising costs rose to
promote brand awareness, while an HSBC Premier
promotion led to higher marketing costs.
Costs grew by 26 per cent in Argentina, with
higher staff costs driven by union-agreed pay rises in
2005, and increased incentives and commissions paid
in light of revenue growth. Marketing costs also
increased to support the launch of various promotions
and campaigns.
Commercial Banking reported pre-tax profits of
US$451 million, 17 per cent higher than in 2005.
Growth in net operating income before loan
impairment charges was strong at 26 per cent as
domestic economies in the region grew and HSBC
built market share. Cost growth in support of this
expansion was held within revenue growth and the
cost efficiency ratio improved by 2.5 per cent.
Net interest income rose by 24 per cent, largely
driven by business expansion in Mexico and Brazil.
In Mexico, net interest income rose by 49 per
cent, reflecting asset and deposit growth, in part due
to the transfer of the 56,000 customers from Personal
Financial Services noted above. As HSBC extended
its presence in the small and middle market business
segments, average deposit balances increased by
65 per cent (31 per cent excluding the transferred
customer accounts), although the benefit of this
volume growth was partly mitigated by lower deposit
spreads in a falling rate environment.
Lending balances in Mexico were 41 per cent
higher, primarily driven by strong demand in the
rapidly growing real estate and residential
construction sectors. During the final quarter of the
year, HSBC opened an International Banking Centre
to develop cross-border business for global
Commercial Banking customers, with 75 business
accounts acquired since its inception. Attention
placed on higher yielding small and middle market
businesses, following refinements made to the
customer segmentation strategy, contributed to asset
growth as greater emphasis was put on increasing
revenues from this segment. These volume benefits
were augmented by improved lending spreads from
lower funding costs in the falling interest rate
environment, which offset reduced yields.
In Brazil, net interest income was 12 per cent
higher. Overall, lending balances rose by 16 per cent,
primarily driven by small and middle market
customers. The recruitment of additional relationship
managers and sales staff, investments made in
receivables financing and greater levels of
promotional activity all combined to build HSBC’s
position in this market segment. There was ongoing
success from the giro fácil product, offering both
revolving loan and overdraft facilities, with average
balances recording a 13 per cent increase. Spreads
widened as interest rates fell, further augmenting the
income benefits of higher lending volumes.
A 42 per cent rise in net interest income in
Argentina was primarily attributable to strong asset
and liability growth. Average lending and deposit
balances increased by 39 per cent and 19 per cent
respectively, as customer numbers rose, particularly
to the small and micro businesses, helped by
favourable economic conditions and investment in
new sales channels. Asset spreads declined, however,
due to competitive market pressures on pricing, partly
offsetting the income benefits of higher lending
volumes. By contrast, deposit spreads improved.
Net fee income was 36 per cent higher, driven by
robust increases across Mexico, Brazil and Argentina.
In Mexico, fee income rose by 28 per cent with
notable success in increasing cross-sales activity.
Growth in customer numbers contributed to higher
transactional volumes which, combined with an
expanded and improved product offering plus
increased marketing activity and re-pricing
initiatives, led to a 41 per cent rise in income from
payments and cash management services. The
Estimulo product offering, comprising a packaged
suite of seven different products including a loan
facility, continued to perform well with fee income
nearly trebling compared with 2005. During the third
quarter, a similar product, Estimulo Empresarial, was
launched, targeting upper-end small business
customers. This product encompasses a suite of
eleven different services and since its introduction
more than 165 clients have been signed, generating
US$50 million of new loans. HSBC’s share of the
121
trade services market continued to grow, building on
the Group’s international network and product
capabilities. Fees from international factoring and
domestic invoicing payment products also rose, as
new products were successfully piloted and marketed
to existing clients. The signing of new merchant
customers led to higher transaction volumes and a
subsequent 60 per cent rise in card acquiring fees.
In Brazil, fee income rose by 47 per cent as
effective cross-selling led to an increase in the
average number of products held per customer.
Current account fee income grew from higher levels
of transactional activity and tariff increases
implemented in 2005. Pricing changes introduced
part-way through 2006 led to higher revenues from
payment and cash management services. There was
improved fee income from assets under management,
and additional marketing to promote trade products
led to a rise in trade services fees.
Fee income in Argentina was 27 per cent higher,
primarily from increases in account and trade
services along with payments and cash management
fees.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions doubled, reflecting strong lending growth,
a higher proportion of small and micro business
lending, and the seasoning of the portfolio.
In Mexico, strong growth in the lower-end small
and micro business lending balances led to increased
loan impairment charges during the year.
A 41 per cent rise in Brazil again reflected large
increases in small and micro business lending
balances and higher delinquency rates as the portfolio
seasoned. This led to a 12 basis point increase in the
proportion of impaired loans to assets. Various
actions were undertaken to manage the effects of the
weakening credit environment, with debt collection
operations enhanced and closer cooperation forged
between sales and collections staff. Changes were
also made to underwriting criteria, coupled with
revisions to sales staff incentive schemes. Following
these measures, an improvement in credit quality was
seen and charges reduced in the second half of the
year compared with the first half. In Argentina,
releases were lower than in 2005.
Operating expenses of US$822 million were
21 per cent higher than in 2005, as businesses
expanded strongly across Latin America.
In Mexico, operating expenses rose by 26 per
cent, largely driven by higher transactional volumes,
new clients acquired and increased lending activity.
Non-staff costs were higher, reflecting the marketing
and IT-related support to business growth.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > 2006 / Profit/(loss) before tax by customer group
In Brazil, expenses grew by 19 per cent,
also largely from higher staff, marketing and
administrative costs. Business expansion activities in
the small and middle market customer segments
followed the recruitment of 270 additional employees
and this, together with union-agreed pay increases,
were the principal drivers behind the 21 per cent rise
in staff costs. Continued enlargement of the branch
network, the opening of an International Banking
Centre and new sales offices combined with increases
in marketing and administration costs in support of
business expansion, contributed further to cost
growth. Costs in Argentina rose by 30 per cent,
primarily staff costs which reflected annual pay
increases and additional headcount driven by
accelerated business activity. In supporting the
growth of the business, there was increased
expenditure on branding, technology and distribution,
with ongoing improvements made to the internet
banking service.
Global Banking and Markets reported a pre-
tax profit of US$475 million, an increase of 30 per
cent compared with 2005. HSBC’s strong global
presence, together with selective investment in
extending service and delivery capabilities in the
region, resulted in higher volumes with new and
existing clients. The cost efficiency ratio improved
moderately.
Total operating income increased by 23 per cent
to US$846 million compared with 2005. In Brazil,
balance sheet management revenues grew
significantly as relatively low short-term interest rates
reduced funding costs. In Argentina, higher net
interest income reflected an increase in index linked
securities portfolios and a growing demand for credit
as regional economies and market confidence
continued their recent improvement. By contrast, in
Mexico, balance sheet management revenues were
constrained by a flattening of the interest rate curve
and relatively stable market conditions.
Net interest income from payments and cash
management rose by 64 per cent as customer volumes
grew, reflecting new client mandates.
Net fee income increased by 29 per cent to
US$167 million, predominantly through increased
performance-related fees on emerging markets funds
managed by HSBC Global Asset Management.
Income in securities services benefited from strong
equity market indices and growth in new business as
assets under custody increased significantly to
US$89 billion.
In Mexico, a 32 per cent rise in payments and
cash management fees was driven by a wider product
offering and the leveraging of established credit
related products and services.
Higher revenues from trading activities in Brazil
flowed from marketing the wider product range and
enhanced delivery capabilities of Global Markets.
Greater volatility in local markets resulted in higher
business volumes in foreign exchange and currency
derivatives. In Argentina, economic and political
stability increased liquidity in the market with foreign
exchange trading benefiting from greater customer
activity. In Mexico, a 23 per cent increase in trading
income was driven by a combination of successful
positioning for a flattening yield curve and higher
client volumes delivered through the extended suite
of products.
A net release of US$26 million in loan
impairment charges reflected a stable corporate credit
environment and the implementation of improved
risk management strategies in Mexico.
Operating expenses rose by 20 per cent to
US$346 million, primarily driven by higher staff
costs reflecting increased performance-related
incentives in line with revenue growth, and pay rises
agreed with local unions. Higher operational costs
reflected increased volumes, particularly in payments
and cash management and securities services
businesses, and the continued investment in building
the Global Banking and Markets’ business in the
region.
Private Banking reported a pre-tax profit of
US$14 million, a significant increase on 2005. Profit
growth was strong in both Mexico and Brazil. In
Brazil, revenue and cost benefits arose from
initiatives to join up the business, including cross-
referrals with other customer groups. Strong revenue
growth in the newly launched business in Mexico
resulted primarily from greater client participation in
capital markets, notably commercial paper
placements, which contributed towards a 53 per cent
rise in fee income. This strong performance was
reflected in the cost efficiency ratio which improved
by 23.4 percentage points to 65.9 per cent.
Within Other, the non-recurrence of coverage
bond receipts and other items related to the 2001
Argentinean sovereign debt crisis led to lower
earnings.
122
Total
US$m
5,576
2,153
272
276
548
320
253
11
9
1,594
228
10,692
(1,427)
9,265
(1,697)
7,568
(5,402)
2,166
12
2,178
%
9.0
58.3
US$m
47,923
99,056
61,292
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business
Latin America
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income on
trading activities .....................
Net trading income5 ....................
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Gains arising from dilution of
interests in associates .............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ..............
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income ...............
Total operating expenses ............
Operating profit ........................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant
to Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
3,983
1,372
Commercial
Banking
US$m
1,407
485
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
410
250
164
18
182
6
82
–
2
80
31
1,043
(60)
983
13
996
(481)
515
2
517
%
2.1
48.9
20
40
2
–
2
–
1
–
–
–
8
71
–
71
–
71
(46)
25
–
25
%
0.1
64.8
(247)
–
–
247
247
–
–
–
–
–
(37)
(37)
–
(37)
–
(37)
37
–
–
–
3
6
–
–
–
–
(1)
11
–
–
12
31
–
31
(6)
25
(22)
3
–
3
%
–
71.0
67
10
77
314
120
–
5
1,448
145
7,464
(1,330)
6,134
(1,492)
4,642
(3,758)
884
9
893
%
3.7
61.3
39
1
40
–
51
–
2
66
69
2,120
(37)
2,083
(212)
1,871
(1,132)
739
1
740
%
3.1
54.3
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
21,680
34,829
30,628
16,243
20,928
15,524
9,935
43,012
13,950
65
260
1,190
–
27
–
10,339
18,950
2,830
123
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Latin America > Profit/(loss) before tax by customer group
Profit/(loss) before tax and balance sheet data by customer group and global business (continued)
Total
US$m
4,197
1,630
301
236
537
237
84
6
1,076
91
7,858
(1,023)
6,835
(938)
5,897
(4,166)
1,731
4
1,735
%
7.9
61.0
US$m
35,791
80,771
50,861
Latin America
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
Net fee income ............................
3,057
1,053
1,037
387
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income5 ....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
61
14
75
227
11
5
992
74
5,494
(957)
4,537
(764)
3,773
Total operating expenses ............
(2,977)
Operating profit/(loss) ................
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
796
4
800
%
3.6
65.6
21
5
26
–
1
1
27
7
1,486
(16)
1,470
(197)
1,273
(822)
451
–
451
%
2.0
55.9
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
325
167
218
(16)
202
11
72
–
59
10
846
(51)
795
26
821
(346)
475
–
475
%
2.2
43.5
13
23
1
–
1
–
–
–
–
4
41
–
41
–
41
(27)
14
–
14
%
(2)
(233)
–
–
233
233
–
–
–
–
(18)
(18)
–
(18)
–
(18)
18
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(1)
–
–
(2)
14
9
1
10
(3)
7
(12)
(5)
–
(5)
%
0.1
65.9
–
120.0
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant
to Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
16,165
28,053
25,200
11,463
16,244
13,754
8,147
36,333
11,685
16
90
222
–
51
–
9,704
15,882
3,115
124
Total
US$m
3,342
1,191
220
317
537
186
80
5
871
286
6,498
(792)
5,706
(676)
5,030
(3,426)
1,604
–
1,604
%
7.7
60.0
US$m
21,681
55,387
30,989
Latin America
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income .....................
Net fee income ............................
2,580
790
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income5 ....................
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income/
(expense) ................................
Total operating income ...............
Net insurance claims6 .................
Net operating income4 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income .................
56
–
56
174
35
5
794
188
4,622
(734)
3,888
(600)
3,288
Total operating expenses ............
(2,502)
Operating profit ..........................
Share of profit/(loss) in
associates and joint ventures ..
Profit before tax ..........................
Share of HSBC’s profit
before tax ................................
Cost efficiency ratio ...................
786
–
786
%
3.8
64.4
767
263
9
–
9
–
–
–
23
18
1,080
(13)
1,067
(89)
978
(621)
357
–
357
%
1.7
58.2
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking &
Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Inter-
segment
elimination14
US$m
292
122
151
(13)
138
9
10
–
57
25
653
(45)
608
11
619
(273)
346
1
347
%
1.7
44.9
10
14
3
1
4
–
–
–
–
(1)
27
–
27
(2)
25
(24)
1
–
1
%
–
88.9
(329)
–
–
329
329
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
22
2
1
–
1
3
35
–
(3)
56
116
–
116
4
120
(6)
114
(1)
113
%
0.5
5.2
Balance sheet data7
Loans and advances to
customers (net) .......................
Total assets .................................
Customer accounts ......................
The following assets and
liabilities were significant
to Global Banking and Markets:
– loans and advances to
banks (net) ..........................
– trading assets, financial
instruments designated at
fair value, and financial
investments .........................
– deposits by banks ...............
For footnotes, see page 130.
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
9,233
15,723
17,302
6,424
9,491
4,703
6,012
28,509
8,661
12
53
102
–
1,611
221
7,410
13,067
1,858
125
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Products and services
Other information
Products and services
Personal Financial Services
Personal Financial Services provides over
125 million individual and self-employed customers
with financial services in 57 countries. The selection
of products and services offered in each of these
given markets is determined by HSBC’s
participation strategy in that market.
In markets where HSBC already has scale or, in
the case of emerging markets where scale can be
built over time, HSBC offers a full range of personal
financial products and services. Typically, products
provided include personal banking products (current
and savings accounts, mortgages and personal loans,
credit cards, and local and international payment
services), together with consumer finance and wealth
management services.
In other markets, HSBC participates more
selectively, targeting only those customer segments
which have strong international connectivity or
where HSBC’s global scale is crucial.
HSBC Premier is a comprehensive banking and
wealth management service for mass affluent,
internationally orientated customers. This premium
banking service provides personalised relationship
management, a single online view of all international
accounts, free international funds transfer between
HSBC accounts, 24-hour priority telephone access,
global travel assistance and wealth management
services. There are now over 2.1 million HSBC
Premier customers, who can use more than
280 specially designated Premier branches and
centres in 37 countries and territories, either
temporarily when visiting or on a more permanent
basis if they require a banking relationship in more
than one country.
There are some markets where HSBC maintains
a Personal Financial Services presence in order to
enhance international connectivity for the customer,
principally for HSBC Premier. These markets offer a
more limited range of products and services.
In certain selected markets, HSBC Direct
provides products specifically tailored for the online
market.
Wealth management (insurance and investment
products and financial planning services) plays an
important part in meeting the needs of customers.
Insurance products distributed by HSBC through its
direct channels and branch networks include loan
protection, life, property and health insurance and
pensions. Acting as both broker and underwriter,
126
HSBC continues to see opportunities to provide
insurance products to more of its customer base.
HSBC also makes available a wide range of
investment products. A choice of third party and
proprietary funds is offered, including traditional
‘long only’ equity and bond funds; structured funds
that provide capital security and opportunities for an
enhanced return; and ‘fund of funds’ products which
offer customers the ability to diversify their
investments across a range of best-in-class fund
managers chosen after a rigorous and objective
selection process. Comprehensive financial planning
services covering customers’ investment, retirement,
personal and asset protection needs are offered
through qualified financial planning managers.
Delivering the right products and services for
particular target markets is a fundamental
requirement in any service business, and market
research and customer analysis is essential to
developing an in-depth understanding of significant
customer segments and their needs. This
understanding of the customer ensures that customer
relationship management systems are effectively
used to identify and fulfil sales opportunities, and to
manage the sales process.
Personal customers prefer to conduct their
financial business at times convenient to them, using
the sales and service channels of their choice. This
demand for flexibility is met through the increased
provision of direct channels such as the internet and
self-service terminals, in addition to traditional and
automated branches and service centres accessed by
telephone.
HSBC Finance’s operations in the US, the UK
and Canada make credit available to customers not
well catered for by traditional banking operations,
facilitate point-of-sale credit in support of retail
purchases and support major affiliate credit card
programmes.
HSBC Finance is a major credit card issuer in
the US, offering HSBC, Household Bank, and
Orchard bank branded cards together with affiliation
programmes such as the GM Card and the AFL-CIO
Union Plus card. HSBC Finance is also a major
provider of third party private label credit cards (or
store cards) through 56 merchant relationships.
High net worth individuals and their families
who choose the differentiated services offered within
Private Banking are not included in this customer
group.
Commercial Banking
HSBC is one of the world’s leading and most
international banks, with 2.8 million Commercial
Banking customers in 64 locations, including sole
proprietors, partnerships, clubs and associations,
incorporated businesses and publicly quoted
companies. At 31 December 2007, HSBC had
total commercial customer account balances of
US$238 billion and total commercial customer
loans and advances, net of loan impairment
allowances, of US$220 billion.
HSBC segments its Commercial Banking
business into corporate, mid-market, small and micro
businesses, allowing the development of tailored
customer propositions while adopting a broader view
of the entire Commercial Banking sector, from sole
traders to top-end mid-market corporations. This
allows HSBC to provide continuous support to
companies as they grow in size both domestically
and internationally, and ensures a clear focus on the
small and micro business sectors, which are typically
the key to innovation and growth in market
economies.
HSBC places particular emphasis on
geographical collaboration to meet its business
customers’ needs and aims to be recognised as the
leading international business bank and the best bank
for small business in target markets. The range of
products and services includes:
Financing: HSBC provides a range of short and
longer-term financing options for Commercial
Banking customers, both domestically and cross-
border, including overdrafts, receivables finance,
term loans and property finance. The Group offers
forms of asset finance in five sites and has
established specialised divisions providing leasing
and instalment finance for vehicles, plant and
equipment.
Payments and cash management: HSBC is a
leading provider of domestic and cross-border
payments, collections, liquidity management and
account services worldwide. The Group’s extensive
network of offices and direct access to numerous
local clearing systems enhances its customers’ ability
to manage their cash efficiently on a global basis.
International trade: HSBC finances and
facilitates significant volumes of international trade,
under both open account terms and traditional trade
finance instruments. HSBC also provides
international factoring, commodity and insured
export finance, and forfaiting services. The Group
utilises its extensive international network to build
customer relationships at both ends of trade flows,
127
and maximises efficiency through expertise in
documentary checking and processing, and highly
automated systems.
Treasury and capital markets: Commercial
Banking customers are volume users of the Group’s
foreign exchange capabilities, including
sophisticated currency and interest rate options.
Commercial cards: HSBC offers commercial
card services in 39 countries. Commercial card
issuing provides its customers with services which
enhance cash management, improve cost control and
streamline purchasing processes. HSBC offers card
acquiring services, either directly or as part of a joint
venture, enabling merchants to accept credit card
payments either in store or on the internet.
Insurance: HSBC offers insurance services in
28 sites which cover a full range of commercial
insurance products designed to meet the needs of
businesses and their employees, including employee
benefit, pension and healthcare programmes, and a
variety of commercial risks such as buildings,
marine, cargo, keyman and credit protection. These
products are provided by HSBC either as an
intermediary (broker, agent or consultant) or as a
supplier of in-house or third party offerings. HSBC
also provides insurance due diligence reviews, and
actuarial and employee benefit consultancy services.
Wealth management services: These include
advice and products related to savings and
investments provided to Commercial Banking
customers and their employees through HSBC’s
worldwide network, with clients being referred to
Private Banking where appropriate.
Investment banking: A small number of
Commercial Banking customers need corporate
finance and advisory support. These requirements
are serviced by the Group on a client-specific basis.
Delivery channels: HSBC deploys a full range
of delivery channels, including specific online and
direct banking offerings such as HSBCnet and
Business Internet Banking.
Global Banking and Markets
Global Banking and Markets provides tailored
financial solutions to major government, corporate
and institutional clients worldwide. Managed as a
global business, Global Banking and Markets
operates a long-term relationship management
approach to build a full understanding of clients’
financial requirements. Sectoral client service teams
comprising relationship managers and product
specialists develop financial solutions to meet
individual client needs. With dedicated offices in
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Products and services / Property / Legal proceedings
over 60 countries and access to HSBC’s worldwide
presence and capabilities, this business serves
subsidiaries and offices of its clients on a global
basis.
Global Banking and Markets is managed as four
principal business lines: Global Markets, Global
Banking, Principal Investments and HSBC Global
Asset Management. This structure allows HSBC to
focus on relationships and sectors that best fit the
Group’s footprint and facilitates seamless delivery
of HSBC’s products and services to clients.
Global Markets
HSBC’s operations in Global Markets consist of
treasury and capital markets services for
supranationals, central banks, corporations,
institutional and private investors, financial
institutions and other market participants. Products
include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
foreign exchange;
currency, interest rate, bond, credit, equity and
other specialised derivatives;
government and non-government fixed income
and money market instruments;
precious metals and exchange traded futures;
equity services, including research, sales and
trading for institutional, corporate and private
clients and asset management services;
distribution of capital markets instruments,
including debt, equity and structured products,
utilising links with HSBC’s global networks;
and
securities services, where HSBC is one of the
world’s leading custodians providing custody
and clearing services and funds administration
to both domestic and cross-border investors.
Global Banking
HSBC’s operations in Global Banking consist of
financing, advisory and transaction services for
corporations, institutional and private investors,
financial institutions, and governments and their
agencies. Products include:
•
financing and capital markets, which comprises
capital raising, including debt and equity capital,
corporate finance and advisory services,
bilateral and syndicated lending, leveraged and
acquisition finance, structured and project
finance, lease finance, and non-retail deposit-
taking;
128
•
•
international, regional and domestic payments
and cash management services; and
other transaction services, including trade
services, factoring and banknotes.
HSBC Global Asset Management
This offers asset management products and services
for institutional investors, intermediaries and
individual investors and their advisers.
Other
Other products include private equity, which
comprises HSBC’s captive private equity funds,
strategic relationships with third party private equity
managers and other investments.
Private Banking
HSBC’s presence in all the major wealth-creating
regions has enabled it to build one of the world’s
leading private banking groups, providing private
banking and trustee services to high net worth
individuals and their families from 90 locations in
37 countries and territories, with client assets of
US$421 billion at 31 December 2007.
HSBC Private Bank is the principal marketing
name of the HSBC Group’s international private
banking business which, together with HSBC
Guyerzeller and the private banking activities of
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt, provides the services
noted below.
Utilising the most suitable products from the
marketplace, Private Banking works with its clients
to offer both traditional and innovative ways to
manage and preserve wealth while optimising
returns. Products and services offered include:
Investment services: These comprise both
advisory and discretionary investment services. A
wide range of investment vehicles is covered,
including bonds, equities, derivatives, options,
futures, structured products, mutual funds and
alternative products, such as hedge funds and fund of
funds. By accessing regional expertise located within
six major advisory centres in Hong Kong, Singapore,
Geneva, New York, Paris and London, Private
Banking seeks to select the most suitable
investments for clients’ needs and investment
strategies.
Global wealth solutions: These comprise
inheritance planning, trustee and other fiduciary
services designed to protect existing wealth and
create tailored structures to preserve wealth for
future generations. Areas of expertise include trusts,
foundation and company administration, charitable
trusts and foundations, insurance and offshore
structures.
Specialist advisory services: Private Banking
offers expertise in several specialist areas of wealth
management including tax advisory and financial
planning, family office advisory, corporate finance,
consolidated reporting, industry services such as
charities and foundations, media, shipping, diamonds
and jewellery, and real estate planning. Specialist
advisers are available to deliver products and
services that are tailored to meet the full range of
high net worth clients’ individual financial needs.
General banking services: These comprise
treasury and foreign exchange, offshore and onshore
deposits, credit and specialised lending, tailor-made
loans and internet banking. Private Banking works to
ensure its clients have full access to relevant skills
and products available throughout HSBC, such as
corporate banking, investment banking and
insurance.
Property
At 31 December 2007, HSBC operated from some
10,500 operational properties worldwide, of which
approximately 3,300 were located in Europe,
850 in Hong Kong and Rest of Asia-Pacific, 1,850 in
North America and 4,500 in Latin America. These
properties had an area of approximately 69.8 million
square feet (2006: 65.4 million square feet).
Freehold, long leasehold and short leasehold
land and buildings carried on the balance sheet
represented 35 per cent of HSBC’s operational
space. In addition, properties with a net book value
of US$1,346 million were held for investment
purposes. Of the total net book value of HSBC
properties, more than 73 per cent were owned or
held under long-term leases.
HSBC’s operational properties are stated at cost,
being historical cost or fair value at the date of
transition to IFRSs (their deemed cost) less any
impairment losses, and are depreciated on a basis
calculated to write off the assets over their estimated
useful lives. Properties owned as a consequence of
an acquisition are recognised initially at fair value.
Valuation of freehold and leasehold land and
buildings
HSBC’s freehold and long leasehold properties,
together with all leasehold properties in Hong Kong,
were valued in 2007. The value of these properties
was US$2.2 billion in excess of their carrying
amount in the consolidated balance sheet.
129
Further details are included in Note 23 on the
Financial Statements.
Legal proceedings
HSBC is party to legal actions in a number of
jurisdictions including the UK, Hong Kong and the
US, arising out of its normal business operations.
HSBC considers that none of the actions is material,
and none is expected to result in a significant
adverse effect on the financial position of HSBC,
either individually or in the aggregate. Management
believes that adequate provisions have been made in
respect of such litigation. HSBC has not disclosed
any contingent liability associated with these legal
actions because it is not practicable to do so, except
as disclosed below.
On 27 July 2007, the UK Office of Fair Trading
(‘OFT’) issued High Court legal proceedings against
a number of UK financial institutions, including
HSBC Bank plc, to determine the legal status and
enforceability of certain of the charges applied to
their personal customers in relation to unauthorised
overdrafts (the ‘charges’). Certain preliminary
issues in these proceedings were heard in a trial in
the Commercial Division of the High Court on
17 January 2008. This trial concluded on 8 February
2008 and judgment, on the preliminary issues tested,
is awaited.
The proceedings remain at a very early stage
and may, if appeals on the preliminary issues (or,
subsequently, on substantive issues) are pursued,
take a number of years to conclude. A wide range of
outcomes is possible, depending, initially, upon
whether the Court finds that some, all, or none of the
charges should be tested for fairness and/or tested as
common law penalties and, if it does find that some
or all of the charges should be so tested, upon the
Court’s subsequent assessment of each charge across
the period under review. Since July 2001, there have
been a variety of charges applied by HSBC Bank plc
across different charging periods under the then
current contractual arrangements. HSBC Bank plc
considers the charges to be and to have been valid
and enforceable, and intends strongly to defend its
position.
If, contrary to HSBC Bank plc’s current
assessment, the Court should ultimately (after
appeals) reach a decision adverse to HSBC Bank plc
that results in liability for it, a large number of
different outcomes is possible, each of which would
have a different financial impact. Based on the facts
currently available to it, and a number of
assumptions, HSBC Bank plc estimates that the
financial impact could be approximately
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Business Review (continued)
Legal proceedings / Financial Review > Introduction
US$600 million. To make an estimate of the
potential financial impact at this stage with any
precision is extremely difficult, owing to (among
other things) the complexity of the issues, the
number of permutations of possible outcomes, and
the early stage of the proceedings. In addition, the
assumptions made by HSBC Bank plc may prove to
be incorrect.
Footnotes to the Business Review
The footnotes below refer to the reconciliations of reported and underlying profit before tax, and the analyses of
customer groups and global businesses on pages 16 to 35 and the geographical regions on pages 36 to 125.
1 ‘Currency translation’ is the effect of translating the results of subsidiaries and associates for the previous year at the average rates of
exchange applicable in the current year.
2 ‘Acquisitions, disposals and (in 2007) dilution gains’ comprises the net increment or decrement in profits in the current year (compared
with the previous year) which is attributable to acquisitions or disposals made, or dilution gains, in the current year.
3 ‘Other income’ in this context comprises net trading income (see 5 below), net income from financial instruments designated at fair
value, gains less losses from financial investments, gains arising from dilution of interests in associates, dividend income, net earned
insurance premiums and other operating income less net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders.
4 Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions.
5 In the analyses of customer groups and global businesses, net trading income comprises all gains and losses from changes in the fair
value of financial assets and financial liabilities classified as held for trading, together with related external and internal interest income
and interest expense, and dividends received; in the statutory presentation internal interest income and expense are eliminated.
6 Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders.
7 Third party only.
8 The main items reported under ‘Other’ are certain property activities, unallocated investment activities including hsbc.com, centrally
held investment companies, movements in the fair value of own debt designated at fair value, and HSBC’s holding company and
financing operations. The results include net interest earned on free capital held centrally and operating costs incurred by the head
office operations in providing stewardship and central management services to HSBC. ‘Other’ also includes the costs incurred by the
Group Service Centres and Shared Service Organisations and associated recoveries.
9 The comparatives have been restated to reflect the current management view.
10 ‘Equities’ includes a total gain of US$107 million from the disposal of HSBC’s investments in Euronext N.V. and the Montreal Exchange
for 2007.
11 HSBC Global Asset Management was formerly known as Group Investment Businesses.
12 ‘Other’ in Global Banking and Markets includes net interest earned on free capital held in the global business not assigned to products.
13 The results of Global Banking and Markets in Europe include gains from principal investments of US$991 million (2006:
US$457 million; 2005: US$610 million).
14 Inter-segment elimination comprises (i) the costs of shared services and Group Service Centres included within ‘Other’ which are
recovered from customer groups, and (ii) the intra-segment funding costs of trading activities undertaken within Global Banking and
Markets. HSBC’s balance sheet management business, reported within Global Banking and Markets, provides funding to the trading
businesses. To report Global Banking and Markets’ ‘Net trading income’ on a fully funded basis, ‘Net interest income’ and ‘Net interest
income/(expense) on trading activities’ are grossed up to reflect internal funding transactions prior to their elimination in the inter-
segment column.
15 France primarily comprises the domestic operations of HSBC France and the Paris branch of HSBC Bank.
16 Trading assets, financial instruments designated at fair value, and financial investments held in Europe, and by Global Banking and
Markets in North America, include financial assets which may be repledged or resold by counterparties.
130
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review
Introduction
Introduction ...................................................
Critical accounting policies ...........................
Financial summary ........................................
Income statement .......................................
Net interest income ....................................
Net fee income ...........................................
Net trading income ....................................
Net income from financial instruments
Page
131
132
135
135
138
141
144
designated at fair value ..........................
146
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................................
148
Gains arising from dilution of interests in
associates ...............................................
Net earned insurance premiums ................
Other operating income .............................
Net insurance claims incurred and
148
149
150
movement in liabilities to policyholders .
152
Loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ..............................
Operating expenses ....................................
Share of profit in associates and joint
ventures ..................................................
Asset deployment .......................................
Trading assets, financial investments and
derivatives ...............................................
Funds under management ..........................
Assets held in custody and under
administration ........................................
Economic profit .........................................
Other financial information ...........................
Average balance sheet and net interest
153
156
159
161
161
162
162
163
164
income ....................................................
164
Analysis of changes in net interest
income ....................................................
Share capital and reserves .........................
Short-term borrowings ...............................
Contractual obligations .............................
Ratios of earnings to combined fixed
171
174
177
178
charges ...................................................
178
Loan maturity and interest sensitivity
analysis ..................................................
Deposits .....................................................
Certificates of deposit and other time
179
180
deposits ..................................................
182
Off-balance sheet arrangements and special
purpose entities ...........................................
Special purpose entities .............................
Other off-balance sheet arrangements .......
183
183
191
131
Introduction
The consolidated financial statements of HSBC and
the separate financial statements of HSBC Holdings
have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRSs’) as endorsed
by the European Union (‘EU’). EU-endorsed IFRSs
may differ temporarily from IFRSs as published by
the International Accounting Standards Board
(‘IASB’) if, at any point in time, new or amended
IFRSs have not been endorsed by the EU. At
31 December 2007, there were no unendorsed
standards effective for the year ended 31 December
2007 affecting these consolidated and separate
financial statements, and there was no difference
between IFRSs endorsed by the EU and IFRSs
issued by the IASB in terms of their application to
HSBC. Accordingly, HSBC’s financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007 are prepared
in accordance with IFRSs as issued by the IASB.
Certain information for 2003 has been prepared
under UK Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (‘UK GAAP’), which are not comparable
with IFRSs.
HSBC uses the US dollar as its presentation
currency because the US dollar and currencies linked
to it form the major currency bloc in which HSBC
transacts its business. Unless otherwise stated, the
accounting information presented in this document
has been prepared in accordance with IFRSs.
Constant currency
Constant currency comparatives for 2006 and 2005
used in the 2007 and 2006 commentaries,
respectively, are computed by retranslating into US
dollars, for non-US dollar branches, subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates:
•
•
the income statements for 2006 and 2005 at the
average rates of exchange for 2007 and 2006,
respectively; and
the balance sheets at 31 December 2006 and
2005 at the prevailing rates of exchange on
31 December 2007 and 2006, respectively.
No adjustment has been made to the exchange
rates used to translate foreign currency denominated
assets and liabilities into the functional currencies of
any HSBC branches, subsidiaries, joint ventures or
associates. When reference is made to ‘constant
currency’ in tables or commentaries, comparative
data reported in the functional currencies of HSBC’s
operations have been translated at the appropriate
exchange rates applied in the current period on the
basis described above.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Critical accounting policies
Critical accounting policies
(Audited)
Introduction
The results of HSBC are sensitive to the accounting
policies, assumptions and estimates that underlie the
preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
The accounting policies used in the preparation of
the consolidated financial statements are described in
Note 2 on the Financial Statements.
When preparing the financial statements, it is
the directors’ responsibility under UK company law
to select suitable accounting policies and to make
judgements and estimates that are reasonable and
prudent.
The accounting policies that are deemed critical
to HSBC’s IFRSs results and financial position, in
terms of the materiality of the items to which the
policy is applied, and which involve a high degree of
judgement including the use of assumptions and
estimation, are discussed below.
Impairment of loans and advances
HSBC’s accounting policy for losses arising from
the impairment of customer loans and advances is
described in Note 2f on the Financial Statements.
Loan impairment allowances represent
management’s best estimate of losses incurred
in the loan portfolios at balance sheet date.
Management is required to exercise judgement
in making assumptions and estimations when
calculating loan impairment allowances on both
individually and collectively assessed loans and
advances. Of the Group’s total loans and advances
to customers before impairment allowances of
US$1,000.8 billion (2006: US$881.7 billion),
US$6.5 billion (2006: US$5.8 billion) or 1 per cent
(2006: 1 per cent) were individually assessed for
impairment, and US$994.3 billion (2006:
US$875.9 billion) or 99 per cent (2006: 99 per cent)
were collectively assessed for impairment.
The most significant judgemental area is the
calculation of collective impairment allowances.
HSBC’s most significant geographical area of
exposure to collectively assessed loans and
advances is North America, which comprised
US$301.4 billion (2006: US$284.8 billion) or 30 per
cent (2006: 33 per cent) of HSBC’s total collectively
assessed loans and advances. Collective impairment
allowances in North America were US$11.9 billion
(2006: US$7.1 billion), representing 72 per cent
(2006: 65 per cent) of the total collectively
assessed loan impairment allowance.
132
HSBC uses two alternative methods to calculate
collective impairment allowances on homogeneous
groups of loans that are not considered individually
significant:
• When appropriate empirical information is
available, HSBC utilises roll-rate methodology.
This methodology employs statistical analysis
of historical data and experience of delinquency
and default to estimate the likelihood that loans
will progress through the various stages of
delinquency and ultimately prove irrecoverable.
The estimated loss is the difference between the
present value of expected future cash flows,
discounted at the original effective interest rate
of the portfolio, and the carrying amount of the
portfolio.
•
In other cases, when the portfolio size is small
or when information is insufficient or not
reliable enough to adopt a roll-rate
methodology, HSBC adopts a formulaic
approach which allocates progressively higher
percentage loss rates the longer a customer’s
loan is overdue. Loss rates are based on
historical experience.
Both methodologies are subject to estimation
uncertainty, in part because it is not practicable to
identify losses on an individual loan basis because
of the large number of individually insignificant
loans in the portfolio.
In addition, the use of statistically assessed
historical information is supplemented with
significant management judgement to assess whether
current economic and credit conditions are such that
the actual level of inherent losses is likely to be
greater or less than that suggested by historical
experience. In normal circumstances, historical
experience provides the most objective and relevant
information from which to assess inherent loss
within each portfolio. In certain circumstances,
historical loss experience provides less relevant
information about the inherent loss in a given
portfolio at the balance sheet date, for example,
where there have been changes in economic,
regulatory or behavioural conditions such that the
most recent trends in the portfolio risk factors are not
fully reflected in the statistical models. In these
circumstances, such risk factors are taken into
account when calculating the appropriate levels of
impairment allowances, by adjusting the impairment
allowances derived solely from historical loss
experience.
This key area of judgement is subject to
uncertainty and is highly sensitive to factors such as
loan portfolio growth, product mix, unemployment
rates, bankruptcy trends, geographic concentrations,
loan product features, economic conditions such as
national and local trends in housing markets, the
level of interest rates, portfolio seasoning, account
management policies and practices, changes in laws
and regulations, and other factors that can affect
customer payment patterns. Different factors are
applied in different regions and countries to reflect
different economic conditions and laws and
regulations. The assumptions underlying this
judgement are highly subjective. The methodology
and the assumptions used in calculating impairment
losses are reviewed regularly in the light of
differences between loss estimates and actual loss
experience. For example, roll rates, loss rates and the
expected timing of future recoveries are regularly
benchmarked against actual outcomes to ensure they
remain appropriate.
The total amount of the Group’s impairment
allowances on homogeneous groups of loans is
inherently uncertain because it is highly sensitive to
changes in economic and credit conditions across a
large number of geographical areas. Economic and
credit conditions within geographical areas are
influenced by many factors with a high degree of
interdependency so that there is no one single factor
to which the Group’s loan impairment allowances as
a whole are particularly sensitive. However, HSBC’s
loan impairment allowances are particularly
sensitive to general economic and credit conditions
in North America. For example, a 10 per cent
increase in impairment allowances on collectively
assessed loans and advances in North America
would increase loan impairment allowances
by US$1.2 billion at 31 December 2007
(2006: US$714 million). It is possible that the
outcomes within the next financial year could be
different from the assumptions built into the models,
resulting in a material adjustment to the carrying
amount of loans and advances.
Goodwill impairment
HSBC’s accounting policy for goodwill is described
in Note 2o on the Financial Statements. Note 22 on
the Financial Statements sets out the Group’s cash
generating units (‘CGUs’) by geographical region
and global business. The most significant amount of
goodwill relates to the Personal Financial Services –
North America CGU, which amounts to
US$10.2 billion or 30 per cent of total goodwill.
The process of identifying and evaluating
goodwill impairment is inherently uncertain because
it requires significant management judgement in
making a series of estimations, the results of which
are highly sensitive to the assumptions used. The
133
review of goodwill impairment represents
management’s best estimate of the factors below.
Firstly, significant management judgement is
required in estimating the future cash flows of the
CGUs. These values are sensitive to the cash flows
projected for the periods for which detailed forecasts
are available, and to assumptions regarding the long-
term pattern of sustainable cash flows thereafter.
Forecasts are compared with actual performance and
verifiable economic data in future years; however,
the cash flow forecasts necessarily and appropriately
reflect management’s view of future business
prospects. Note 22 shows how the key assumptions
used in estimating future cash flows for each CGU
have changed from 2006 to 2007.
Secondly, the cost of capital assigned to an
individual CGU and used to discount its future cash
flows can have a significant effect on the CGU’s
valuation. The cost of capital percentage is generally
derived from a Capital Asset Pricing Model, which
incorporates inputs reflecting a number of financial
and economic variables, including the risk-free
interest rate in the country concerned and a premium
to reflect the inherent risk of the business being
evaluated. These variables are established on the
basis of significant management judgement and are
subject to uncertainty.
When this exercise demonstrates that the
expected cash flows of a CGU have declined and/or
that its cost of capital has increased, the effect is to
reduce the CGU’s estimated fair value. If this results
in an estimated recoverable amount that is lower
than the carrying value of the CGU, a charge for
impairment of goodwill will be recorded, thereby
reducing by a corresponding amount HSBC’s profit
for the year.
Note 22 on the Financial Statements includes
details of the CGUs with significant balances of
goodwill, and states the key assumptions used to
assess the goodwill in each CGU for impairment.
Goodwill impairment testing performed in 2007
and 2006 indicated that there was no impairment of
goodwill. It is possible that the outcomes within the
next financial year could be different from the
assumptions used, resulting in a material adjustment
to the carrying amount of goodwill. In particular, the
deterioration in the economic and credit conditions
in North America has resulted in a severe decline in
the profitability of the North American consumer
finance business during 2007, and as a result
goodwill impairment in the Personal Financial
Services – North America CGU was re-tested as at
31 December 2007. Notwithstanding these
conditions, the recoverable amount based on
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Critical accounting policies > Financial summary / Income statement
expected cash flows continued to exceed the
carrying amount including goodwill in the CGU, and
therefore no goodwill impairment has occurred.
However, in the event of further significant
deterioration in the economic and credit conditions
beyond the levels already reflected by management
in the cash flow forecasts for the CGU, a further
special review would be made, in addition to the
annual review of the carrying value, including
goodwill against the recoverable amount for the
CGU. If this review indicated that the deterioration
in current conditions and future outlook is
sufficiently severe, this could result in a material
adjustment to the carrying amount of goodwill.
Valuation of financial instruments
HSBC’s accounting policy for valuation of financial
instruments is described in Note 2d on the Financial
Statements.
The best evidence of fair value is a quoted price
in an actively traded market. If the market for a
financial instrument is not active, a valuation
technique is used. The majority of valuation
techniques employ only observable market data,
and so the reliability of the fair value measurement
is high. However, certain financial instruments are
valued on the basis of valuation techniques that
feature one or more significant market inputs that
are not observable. Valuation techniques that rely to
a greater extent on non-observable inputs require a
higher level of management judgement to calculate
a fair value than those based wholly on observable
inputs.
Valuation techniques used to calculate fair
values include comparisons with similar financial
instruments for which market observable prices
exist, discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing
models and other valuation techniques commonly
used by market participants. Valuation techniques
incorporate assumptions that other market
participants would use in their valuations, including
assumptions about interest rate yield curves,
exchange rates, volatilities, and prepayment and
default rates. When valuing instruments by reference
to comparable instruments, management takes into
account the maturity, structure and rating of the
instrument with which the position held is being
compared.
The main assumptions and estimates which
management considers when applying a model with
valuation techniques are:
•
the likelihood and expected timing of future
cash flows on the instrument. These cash flows
are usually governed by the terms of the
134
instrument, although management judgement
may be required when the ability of the
counterparty to service the instrument in
accordance with the contractual terms is in
doubt. Future cash flows may be sensitive to
changes in market rates;
•
•
selecting an appropriate discount rate for
the instrument. Management bases the
determination of this rate on its assessment of
what a market participant would regard as the
appropriate spread of the rate for the instrument
over the appropriate risk-free rate; and
judgement to determine what model to use to
calculate fair value in areas where the choice of
valuation model is particularly subjective, for
example, when valuing complex derivative
products.
When applying a model with unobservable
inputs, estimates are made to reflect uncertainties in
fair values resulting from a lack of market data
inputs, for example, as a result of illiquidity in the
market. For these instruments, the fair value
measurement is less reliable. Inputs into valuations
based on non-observable data are inherently
uncertain because there are little or no current
market data available from which to determine the
level at which an arm’s length transaction would
occur under normal business conditions. However,
in most cases there are some market data available
on which to base a determination of fair value, for
example historical data, and the fair values of most
financial instruments will be based on some market
observable inputs even where the non-observable
inputs are significant.
Note 33 on the Financial Statements provides
an analysis of the basis for valuation of financial
instruments measured at fair value in the financial
statements. The value of financial assets and
liabilities that use a valuation technique are
US$625.5 billion and US$400.7 billion or 66 per
cent and 68 per cent of total assets and total
liabilities measured at fair value respectively. Note
33 on the Financial Statements presents a sensitivity
analysis of fair values for financial instruments with
significant unobservable inputs to reasonably
possible alternative assumptions. Given the
uncertainty and subjective nature of valuing financial
instruments at fair value, it is possible that the
outcomes within the next financial year could be
different from the assumptions used, and this would
result in a material adjustment to the carrying
amount of financial instruments measured at fair
value.
Financial summary
Income statement
Year ended 31 December
Interest income ................................................................................................
Interest expense ...............................................................................................
Net interest income ..........................................................................................
Fee income .......................................................................................................
Fee expense ......................................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Trading income excluding net interest income ...............................................
Net interest income on trading activities .........................................................
Net trading income ..........................................................................................
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ....................
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Gains arising from dilution of interests in associates .....................................
Dividend income ..............................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
Total operating income .................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders .
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ................................................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .............................
Net operating income ....................................................................................
Employee compensation and benefits .............................................................
General and administrative expenses ..............................................................
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment ...............................................
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets ..........................................
Total operating expenses ...............................................................................
Operating profit .............................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...............................................
Profit before tax .............................................................................................
Tax expense .....................................................................................................
Profit for the year ..........................................................................................
Profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company ..............................
Profit attributable to minority interests ...........................................................
2007
US$m
92,359
(54,564)
37,795
26,337
(4,335)
22,002
4,458
5,376
9,834
4,083
1,956
1,092
324
9,076
1,439
87,601
(8,608)
78,993
(17,242)
61,751
(21,334)
(15,294)
(1,714)
(700)
(39,042)
22,709
1,503
24,212
(3,757)
20,455
19,133
1,322
2006
US$m
75,879
(41,393)
34,486
21,080
(3,898)
17,182
5,619
2,603
8,222
657
969
–
340
5,668
2,546
70,070
(4,704)
65,366
(10,573)
54,793
(18,500)
(12,823)
(1,514)
(716)
(33,553)
21,240
846
22,086
(5,215)
16,871
15,789
1,082
2005
US$m
60,094
(28,760)
31,334
17,486
(3,030)
14,456
3,656
2,208
5,864
1,034
692
–
155
5,436
2,733
61,704
(4,067)
57,637
(7,801)
49,836
(16,145)
(11,183)
(1,632)
(554)
(29,514)
20,322
644
20,966
(5,093)
15,873
15,081
792
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
The strength of HSBC’s diversified business model
was demonstrated by profit growth in a year in
which financial markets experienced significant
dislocation and the credit environment, particularly
in the US, deteriorated markedly. Pre-tax profits in
2007 increased by 10 per cent to US$24.2 billion
and earnings per share rose by 18 per cent to
US$1.65. Despite unprecedented market conditions,
the return on shareholders’ equity exceeded 15 per
cent, capital ratios remained strong, revenue growth
was in double digits and the cost efficiency ratio
improved. For the first time in recent years, pre-tax
profits from the Group’s emerging markets
operations exceeded 60 per cent of total profits.
On an underlying basis, profit before tax was
broadly in line with 2006. This was arrived at after
excluding the effects of a US$1.1 billion gain from
the dilution of holdings in associates in mainland
China, restating comparative information using the
average exchange rates applicable in 2007, and
135
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Income statement
adjusting for acquisitions and disposals. The table on
page 15 provides a more detailed reconciliation of
reported and underlying profit before tax.
These results illustrated the benefit derived
from the Group’s broad diversification, both
geographically and by range of business. An
excellent performance in Asia in all customer groups
compensated for the effect of deteriorating
conditions in the US and slower growth in other
mature markets. Commercial Banking and Private
Banking again delivered record results, as did many
of the businesses within the newly designated Global
Banking and Markets segment.
In Asia, the Group had a notably strong year.
Vigorous economic activity across the region, strong
trade flows and buoyant equity markets helped drive
underlying profit growth of 42 per cent in Hong
Kong and 34 per cent in Rest of Asia-Pacific. This
growth was broadly based, with profits in all
customer groups and in each of the main countries in
which HSBC operates ahead of 2006. Results in
Latin America were also better than in 2006, as an
excellent performance in Brazil more than offset
higher loan impairment charges in Mexico.
Pre-tax profits in North America fell
significantly as loan impairment charges rose and
trading income declined. What began in 2006 as a
deterioration in credit quality in a particular portfolio
of purchased mortgages in the US consumer finance
business, widened in the second half of 2007 to
affect the consumer lending business as a whole as
economic conditions deteriorated in the US, the
housing market contracted and market liquidity for
asset-backed securities dried up. This lack of
liquidity also adversely affected credit trading and
asset-backed securities businesses within Global
Banking and Markets where de-leveraging of traded
markets contributed to volatility and lower
valuations. The effect of these factors was partially
offset by a gain on HSBC’s own debt designated at
fair value.
Within Europe, underlying pre-tax profit
performance was mixed, mainly as a consequence of
ex gratia payments expensed in respect of overdraft
fees applied in previous years and a provision for
reimbursement of certain charges on historic will
trusts and other related services. Offsetting this was
a large fair value gain on the valuation of the portion
of the Group’s own debt that is carried at fair value.
Encouragingly, Personal Financial Services in the
UK proved very successful in attracting deposit
balances, which rose 15 per cent on 2006.
In 2007, notwithstanding the severe disruption
in traded markets, Global Banking and Markets
136
delivered higher profits, which rose by 5 per cent
to US$6.1 billion. This was driven by record results
in its foreign exchange, payments and cash
management, equities, HSBC Global Asset
Management and securities services businesses;
these more than offset the significant write-downs
inthe Credit and Rates businesses, largely the
consequence of the market-related factors
discussed above.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
HSBC made a profit before tax of US$22.1 billion, a
rise of US$1.1 billion, or 5 per cent, compared with
2005. Incremental contributions to pre-tax profit
from Metris in the US, the Argentine retail
operations acquired from Banca Nazionale and Ping
An Insurance in mainland China, less the profits of
Cyprus Popular Bank, which was sold during the
year, accounted for US$347 million of the increase
in pre-tax profit in the period. These represented the
bulk of changes in the constitution of the Group. On
an underlying basis, which is described on page
131, profit before tax increased by 3 per cent.
Average invested capital increased by
US$10.6 billion compared with 2005 and return on
that capital fell slightly by 1.0 per cent to 14.9 per
cent. Revenue growth was 13 per cent and the cost
efficiency ratio was broadly unchanged at 51.3 per
cent; the Group’s Tier 1 ratio strengthened to 9.4 per
cent.
HSBC’s results in 2006 reflected the benefits of
diversified earnings. There were a number of
outstanding achievements, for example, exceeding
US$1 billion pre-tax profits for the first time in
Mexico and the Middle East, and in each of the
Group Private Banking and Commercial Banking
businesses in Rest of Asia-Pacific. HSBC added
approximately US$1 billion in extra pre-tax profits
in Rest of Asia-Pacific and globally in the
Commercial Banking businesses.
However, results in 2006 also reflected a decline
in pre-tax profits of around US$725 million in the
Group’s personal businesses in the US as a portfolio
of sub-prime mortgages purchased by a subsidiary of
HSBC Finance, mortgage services, suffered much
higher delinquency than had been built into pricing
these products.
Earnings continued to be well diversified, both
geographically and by customer group. Regionally,
Asia including Hong Kong had record results as did
the Group’s newly designated Latin America region,
which combines Mexico and Central America with
HSBC’s South American businesses. Within the
Customer Groups, Commercial Banking again
delivered a record performance, as did Private
Banking and Global Banking and Markets, which
made strong progress in the areas in which the
Group has been investing in recent years. Personal
Financial Services declined as growth in Asia and
Latin America was masked by the problems in the
US mortgage services business.
The economic backdrop in 2006 was favourable.
Global equity markets enjoyed strong gains for much
of the year, encouraging expanded investment flows
and creating a receptive marketplace for the high
level of mergers and acquisitions and IPO activity
which followed. However, in these favourable
conditions, the cumulative effect of rising short-term
rates, benign credit conditions and strong liquidity
put pressure on interest margins.
The credit environment for corporate and
commercial lending continued to be exceptionally
good. However, on the back of slowing housing
markets and rising interest rates, a marked
deterioration was experienced in the sub-prime
mortgage market in the US. This more than
outweighed the non-recurrence in 2006 of loan
impairment costs associated with a surge in
bankruptcy filings in the US in the fourth quarter
of 2005, and the effect of hurricane Katrina.
Net operating income before loan impairment
charges and other credit risk provisions of
US$65.4 billion was US$7.7 billion or 13 per cent
higher than in 2005, 11 per cent higher on an
underlying basis. Commercial Banking, Global
Banking and Markets and Private Banking
operations all achieved strong double-digit growth.
Operating income performance was well spread
geographically, with the strongest growth in HSBC’s
operations in Asia and in Latin America.
Loan impairment and other credit risk
provisions, expressed as a percentage of gross
average advances to customers, at 1.4 per cent, were
20 basis points higher in 2006 than the 1.2 per cent
recorded in 2005. There was also a 20 basis point
rise in the ratio of new loan impairment charges to
gross average advances to customers, from 1.4 per
cent in 2005 to 1.6 per cent in 2006. The charge of
US$10.6 billion was US$2.8 billion, or 36 per cent,
higher than in 2005, 30 per cent higher on an
underlying basis. Of this increase, approximately
60 per cent arose in the Group’s Personal Financial
Services businesses in North America, with the
major increase being in the US sub-prime mortgage
portfolio acquired through mortgage services.
Impairment charges in the UK were broadly stable as
a percentage of lending to customers despite a rising
trend of consumer recourse to debt mitigation
arrangements. There was also some credit
deterioration in a few emerging market countries,
notably in the first half of 2006, as a consequence of
regulatory changes.
Total operating expenses of US$33.6 billion
were US$4.0 billion or 14 per cent higher than in
2005, 11 per cent higher on an underlying basis.
Much of the growth reflected investment to expand
the Group’s geographic presence and add product
expertise and sales support. This expansion was most
marked in Personal Financial Services in North
America, and in Global Banking and Markets, where
the cost efficiency ratio improved slightly as strong
revenue growth offset the first full year effect of
investment expenditure in previous years.
HSBC’s share of profit in associates and joint
ventures increased by US$202 million, with
improved contributions from The Saudi British
Bank, Bank of Communications and Industrial Bank,
supplemented by a first full year contribution from
Ping An Insurance. HSBC’s share of profits from
investments in associates in Rest of Asia-Pacific
accounted for nearly a quarter of the profits from
that region. For further detailed discussion and
analysis by geographical segment of the Group’s
results see Report of the Directors: Business Review
from page 76.
137
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Net interest income
Net interest income
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
2007
US$m
7,746
5,483
4,143
14,847
5,576
%
20.4
14.5
11.0
39.3
14.8
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
8,289
4,685
3,047
14,268
4,197
%
24.0
13.6
8.8
41.4
12.2
2005
US$m
8,221
4,064
2,412
13,295
3,342
%
26.2
13.0
7.7
42.4
10.7
Net interest income ..................................
37,795
100.0
34,486
100.0
31,334 100.0
Net interest income (US$m).............................................................................
Average interest-earning assets (US$m) ..........................................................
Gross interest yield (per cent)1 .........................................................................
Net interest spread (per cent)2 ..........................................................................
Net interest margin (per cent)3 .........................................................................
37,795
1,296,701
34,486
1,113,404
7.12
2.86
2.91
6.82
2.94
3.10
Year ended 31 December
2007
2006
2005
31,334
999,421
6.01
2.88
3.14
1 Gross interest yield is the average annualised interest rate earned on average interest-earning assets (‘AIEA’).
2 Net interest spread is the difference between the average annualised interest rate earned on AIEA, net of amortised premiums and loan
fees, and the average annualised interest rate paid on average interest-bearing funds.
3 Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as an annualised percentage of AIEA.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Net interest income of US$37.8 billion increased by
10 per cent, 4 per cent on an underlying basis. The
commentary below is on an underlying basis.
The change in net interest income was
influenced by the following factors:
•
•
higher average interest rates in many major
currencies resulted in higher interest income
from the investment of low-cost deposits and
transactional balances in Personal Financial
Services and the payments and cash
management businesses within Commercial
Banking and Global Banking and Markets;
lending spreads in 2007 continued to reflect the
relatively benign corporate and commercial
credit conditions which have existed for the past
three to four years, some upward re-pricing
occurred in personal lending as a result of
growing delinquency and restricted credit
appetite. As market liquidity was withdrawn in
the last four months of the year, the value and
cost of funding rose markedly;
• HSBC continued to focus on competitive
liability products, which led to a 16 per cent
growth in average deposits and current
accounts; this exceeded the 6 per cent rise in
average loans and advances to customers;
•
there was an increased cost of funding HSBC’s
trading activities in HSBC’s overall result. Net
interest income includes the cost of funding
138
trading assets, while the related external
revenues are reported in trading income. In
HSBC’s customer group results, the cost of
funding trading assets is included within Global
Banking and Markets’ net trading income as an
interest expense; and
•
balance sheet management revenues increased
compared with 2006. This was mainly due to
recovery in Asia.
In Europe, net interest income declined by
18 per cent. This was mainly driven by the
expansion of trading activities in both the UK and
France which resulted in higher funding costs, with
the related revenues reported in the trading income
line, as discussed above. This was partly offset by
higher net interest income in the personal and
commercial businesses.
In the UK, Personal Financial Services’
spreads widened in a rising interest rate environment
and competitive pricing attracted higher balances.
This was mitigated by lower spreads on mortgages
as customers switched to fixed rate products. In
Commercial Banking, higher net interest income was
largely driven by growth in the UK, Turkey,
Germany and Malta. The launch of a negotiated rate
deposit product in previous years continued to prove
successful in driving higher deposit balances. Strong
growth in corporate and structured banking for micro
customers, together with expansion in lending to
small and mid-market customers, contributed to
higher lending balances in the UK, although this
investment flows increased, higher transactional
balances in the payments and cash management
businesses also delivered higher net interest income.
In Personal Financial Services, net interest
income rose by 23 per cent, driven by higher
personal lending, credit cards and deposit balances.
Growth was broad-based across the region.
Commercial Banking net interest income grew by
29 per cent. Expansion of the branch network, call
centres and Business Internet Banking helped to
drive an increase in customer numbers which, in
turn, led to deposit and loan growth.
Net interest income in North America rose by
4 per cent, as higher revenues from payments and
cash management, commercial lending and cards
were offset by lower mortgage balances, spread
compression and higher non-performing balances.
Overall average lending balances were 5 per
cent higher, as growth in credit cards and vehicle
finance offset lower mortgage balances. The benefits
of higher volumes were largely offset as asset
spreads narrowed due to higher funding costs. Also,
although deposit balances rose, spreads reduced as
the product mix shifted to higher yielding products.
Business expansion and higher customer volumes
drove growth in loans and deposits in Commercial
Banking. A 43 per cent increase in revenue from
payments and cash management was due to higher
customer balances.
In Latin America, net interest income increased
by 17 per cent. Growth was strong across the region,
with net interest income rising by 22 and 11 per cent
in Mexico and Brazil, respectively.
In Mexico, notwithstanding lower balance sheet
management revenues, higher net interest income
was due to both asset and liability growth. In
particular, increased credit card balances were driven
by marketing and portfolio management initiatives to
improve customer retention and card usage. Net
interest income in Brazil increased as the sound
economic outlook and falling interest rates resulted
in strong demand for credit.
Average interest-earning assets (‘AIEA’) of
US$1,297 billion were US$121 billion, or 10 per
cent, higher than 2006 on an underlying basis.
benefit was partially constrained by spread
compression in a competitive market.
Revenues from transactional balances held
within the payments and cash management business
increased by 13 per cent, as credit market dislocation
in the second half of the year caused customers to
hold higher cash balances. After several periods of
decline, balance sheet management revenues in
Europe increased.
In Turkey, higher net interest income was driven
by new customer acquisition. In Switzerland, the
Private Banking business earned higher net interest
income from lending to existing clients as they
further leveraged their portfolios.
In Hong Kong, net interest income rose by
17 per cent, driven by growth in asset and liability
products in the personal, commercial and corporate
businesses. Net interest income from Global
Banking and Markets increased by 79 per cent as
balance sheet management revenues recovered and
deposits grew strongly with higher spreads. A rise in
liabilities to fund trading activities reduced net
interest income, with a corresponding rise in trading
income.
Personal Financial Services’ net interest income
grew by 16 per cent, driven by wider spreads on
higher deposit balances. The relaunch of HSBC
Premier contributed to the growth in deposit
balances. Card balances were also higher, following
a number of promotional programmes during the
year. In Commercial Banking, strong economic
growth helped generate demand for savings products
and this, combined with strong customer acquisition,
resulted in higher net interest earned from liability
products.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, HSBC continued to
invest in expanding the branch network, particularly
in the large markets of mainland China, Indonesia
and India. This, combined with increased marketing
and greater brand awareness, accelerated customer
acquisition and consequently growth in loans and
deposits. Net interest income across the region rose
by 30 per cent.
In the Middle East, net interest income
increased significantly, driven by balance sheet
expansion across all customer groups, augmented
by improved yields. Balance sheet growth was
underpinned by a strong local economy, higher oil
prices and demand for credit for infrastructure
investment.
In Global Banking and Markets, higher net
interest income was driven by the recovery in
balance sheet management revenues. As trade and
139
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Net interest income / Net fee income
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net interest income of US$34.5 billion was 10 per
cent higher than in 2005 and 7 per cent higher on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows is on
an underlying basis.
Movements in net interest income were
particularly influenced by the following factors:
•
•
•
rising short-term interest rates in US dollars and
linked currencies, and in sterling, increased the
value of low-cost deposits and transactional
balances and increased the interest income
earned from investing those balances. This was
particularly relevant to the Personal Financial
Services and Commercial Banking businesses in
Asia and the UK, and also improved the value
of cash balances within the Group’s custody and
payments and cash management businesses and
increased the resultant investment income;
the cumulative effect of higher short-term
interest rates in most major currencies in recent
years has been to flatten interest rate yield
curves and to reduce the opportunities available
to HSBC’s balance sheet management
operations to generate additional income. This
reduced growth in net interest income compared
with 2005 by some 2 percentage points;
strong liquidity and benign credit conditions put
pressure on lending margins in corporate and
commercial banking and credit spreads
tightened as a consequence. Increased
competition for core deposits also reduced
deposit spreads in certain markets;
• HSBC deployed an increased proportion of
liabilities into trading assets. Reported net
interest income includes the cost of internally
funding these assets, while related revenue is
included in trading income. This was
particularly relevant to the UK, France and the
US. The cost of funding net long positions is
included within trading as an interest expense in
HSBC’s customer group reporting; and
• HSBC concentrated balance sheet expansion on
attracting liabilities and, as a result, customer
deposits, at constant currency but including
acquisitions, grew by 3 percentage points more
than customer loans.
In Europe, net interest income increased by
1 per cent. The benefit of balance growth in Personal
Financial Services and Commercial Banking was
substantially offset by the increased deployment of
liabilities to the fund trading activity referred to
140
above; there was a corresponding rise in trading
income. This was most pronounced in the UK and
France.
In the UK, growth in Personal Financial
Services was strong in savings and packaged current
accounts, but mortgage and credit card lending also
increased. In Commercial Banking, customer
recruitment boosted growth in deposit balances and
spreads widened, particularly on US dollar
denominated accounts. Commercial lending balances
were higher, in part reflecting the strong growth
throughout 2005. In France, revenues declined
despite growth in lending, due to competitive pricing
pressures and the impact of older, higher-yielding
hedges of the network’s funding surplus maturing.
Global Banking and Markets’ balance sheet
management revenues declined as the rising trend in
short-term interest rates continued to flatten yield
curves.
In Hong Kong, net interest income rose by
15 per cent. Deposit spreads widened with
progressive interest rate rises, and balances increased
as customers took advantage of higher rates. HSBC
supported this growth with a number of promotions
and marketing campaigns during the year. In
Personal Financial Services, average savings and
deposit balances rose by 7 per cent. The launch of a
simplified mortgage pricing structure helped boost
mortgage balances and grow market share. A clear
focus on sales and targeted marketing helped achieve
strong growth in credit card balances, and the
number of cards in issue rose by 17 per cent to
4.6 million. Average corporate lending balances rose
as the economy gained momentum and investment
was channelled into mainland China. The benefit of
these developments, however, was substantially
offset by spread compression through the rising cost
of funds, and lower balance sheet management
revenues as short-term interest rates continued to
rise, and yield curves remained flat.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, a 25 per cent rise in net
interest income was fuelled by balance sheet growth
in Personal Financial Services and Commercial
Banking. This reflected HSBC’s continuing
investment in growing the business through network
expansion, customer recruitment and targeted
marketing and promotions. In Personal Financial
Services, the emphasis on the recruitment of HSBC
Premier customers generated strong deposit growth
throughout the region, which funded increased
mortgage and credit card borrowing. Other
unsecured lending balances also grew significantly,
as HSBC expanded its consumer finance operations
in India, Australia and Indonesia. In corporate and
commercial banking, increased deposits raised
through customer recruitment and through higher
transactional balances in the payments and cash
management and the custody businesses were
significant to the growth in net interest income. On
the asset side, growth reflected strong demand for
credit as regional economies continued to expand
and trade flows increased.
In North America, net interest income
increased by 3 per cent. In the US Personal Financial
Services business, strong growth in mortgages,
cards, and other personal unsecured non-credit card
lending was funded by a 21 per cent rise in average
deposits to US$32.2 billion. This was led by the
continued success of the online savings product
which grew by US$6 billion to US$7 billion at
31 December 2006. Higher spreads in credit cards,
reflecting a lower proportion of promotional
balances and a degree of re-pricing, were in contrast
with most other portfolios. Overall, asset spreads
contracted, driven by the effect on funding costs of a
succession of interest rate rises, while competitive
pricing and customer migration to higher yielding
products reduced spreads on deposits. Net interest
income was boosted in Canada by strong lending to
personal and commercial customers, supported by
deposit raising initiatives. However, these benefits
were partly offset by lower Global Banking and
Markets’ balance sheet management income as
spreads narrowed as a result of higher short-term
rates coupled with a flat yield curve in the US. The
increased deployment of liabilities to fund trading
Net fee income
activity also reduced growth in net interest income,
with a corresponding increase in trading income.
In Latin America, net interest income increased
by 17 per cent. In Mexico, deposit growth was
boosted by the continuing success of the Tu Cuenta
packaged account in Personal Financial Services.
Credit card, unsecured lending and mortgage
balances also grew strongly, though the benefit of
the latter was offset by competitive pressure on
spreads. In Brazil, where the domestic economy
improved and inflation remained low, rising
consumer demand for credit, together with increased
sales activity and customer recruitment, drove strong
lending growth. Deposits rose through current
accounts linked to the growing payroll loan business.
Growth in Commercial Banking was mainly in the
small and middle market customer segments. HSBC
increased focus on these businesses through network
expansion and the recruitment of additional sales
staff throughout the region. In Global Banking and
Markets, improved balance sheet management
revenues and growth in the payments and cash
management business were the major contributors to
interest income growth.
AIEA of US$1,113 billion were US$114 billion,
or 11 per cent, higher than in 2005. On an underlying
basis, growth was 10 per cent. HSBC’s net interest
margin was 3.10 per cent in 2006, compared with
3.14 per cent in 2005.
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
2007
US$m
8,431
3,362
2,246
5,810
2,153
%
38.3
15.3
10.2
26.4
9.8
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
7,108
2,056
1,622
4,766
1,630
%
41.4
12.0
9.4
27.7
9.5
2005
US$m
6,299
1,674
1,340
3,952
1,191
%
43.6
11.6
9.3
27.3
8.2
Net fee income .........................................
22,002 100.0
17,182 100.0
14,456 100.0
141
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Net fee income
Cards1 ...............................................................................................................
Account services ..............................................................................................
Funds under management ................................................................................
Broking income ...............................................................................................
Insurance1 ........................................................................................................
Global custody .................................................................................................
Credit facilities ................................................................................................
Unit trusts ........................................................................................................
Imports/exports ................................................................................................
Remittances .....................................................................................................
Corporate finance ............................................................................................
Underwriting ....................................................................................................
Trust income ....................................................................................................
Taxpayer financial services .............................................................................
Maintenance income on operating leases ........................................................
Mortgage servicing ..........................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Total fee income ..............................................................................................
Less: fee expense .............................................................................................
Net fee income .................................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
5,367
3,633
2,718
1,354
1,358
797
922
520
780
472
255
286
248
263
122
97
1,888
21,080
(3,898)
17,182
2005
US$m
4,462
3,132
1,831
1,104
1,319
656
880
388
722
396
211
274
199
243
180
76
1,413
17,486
(3,030)
14,456
2007
US$m
6,496
4,359
2,975
2,012
1,836
1,404
1,138
875
866
556
409
367
299
252
139
109
2,245
26,337
(4,335)
22,002
1 Comparative information has been restated to conform with the current year’s presentation.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Net fee income increased by 28 per cent to
US$22.0 billion, 23 per cent on an underlying basis.
The commentary that follows is on an underlying
basis.
• Buoyant stock markets in Hong Kong and
throughout the Rest of Asia-Pacific region
resulted in markedly higher income from wealth
management products, broking services and
global custody in the region.
• Card fee income increased, mainly in the US
and Mexico. Income growth in the US was
driven by higher late and over-limit fees.
Merchandising and services fees also increased.
In Mexico, the credit card business continued to
grow, both in balances and in transaction
volumes.
•
Increased customer activity in Europe, North
America and Latin America were the main
drivers for increased account services income.
In the US, growth in credit card balances
triggered a higher use of the Intellicheck service,
which resulted in higher account services
income. In the UK, growth in the sale of fee-
based packaged accounts contributed to growth
in account services fees.
In Europe, fee income rose by 11 per cent.
Account services increased on higher customer
balances and volumes of transactions, supported by
sales of fee-earning packaged accounts in the UK. In
France, HSBC recorded an increase in transaction
volumes while growth in client assets resulted in
higher commission income in Private Banking. Card
fees increased in the UK and Turkey, mainly on
interchange and acquiring fees. This was partly
offset by a reduction in default fees in the UK
following regulatory intervention by the OFT in
2006. Broking income increased in the UK,
Germany and Switzerland, mainly driven by growth
in client assets and transaction volumes. Funds under
management decreased on lower income from the
Hermitage Fund due to the part sale of fund
holdings.
In Hong Kong, buoyant stock market activity
drove income on a number of commission lines.
Broking and global custody income rose as larger
trading volumes were registered on higher stock
exchange daily turnover. This was enhanced by the
launch of new investment schemes, awareness
campaigns and the adoption of a new portfolio
wealth management sales tool in the branch network.
An increase in IPO activity through Hong Kong,
mainly derived from mainland China, positively
affected underwriting fees. Life insurance
commission income increased, boosted by the
launch of new products.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, fee income increased
by 34 per cent. Buoyant stock markets stimulated
customer appetite for unit trusts and other
investment products. Strong investment sales were
recorded in India, Philippines, South Korea,
142
Singapore and mainland China. Security services
increased, driven by a sustained level of transaction
volumes and investment flows. In the Middle East,
increases were registered in cards, global custody,
credit facilities and insurance. Increased trade
services income in the region reflected higher intra-
regional trade flows, which were driven by strong
economic performance.
In North America, card fee income rose as a
result of higher balances attracting late and over-
limit fees. The Intellicheck service, which allows
customers to pay their credit card balances over the
telephone for a fee, proved popular with customers.
Revenues from enhancement services on cards
which offer services such as debt protection and
identity protection, rose on higher sales. Payments
and cash management fees also increased on higher
volumes generated. Canada registered growth in
investor administration fees and fees on the
immigrant investor programme. Account services
fees also increased.
In Latin America, card fee income rose, mainly
due to increased volumes and balances in Mexico.
The use of debit and credit cards grew, in part driven
by the extended ATM network. Strong growth in
customer accounts delivered higher transactional
fees and the continuing success of the Tu Cuenta
product led to increased take-up with higher product
fees charged to customers. Lending-related fees
increased in Brazil, aided by higher current account
and payments and cash management fees.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net fee income of US$17.2 billion was 19 per cent
higher than in 2005, or 16 per cent higher on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows is on
an underlying basis.
• Robust global stock market performance,
particularly in emerging markets, led to
increased customer appetite for equity-based
products. HSBC responded by launching new
investment products and increasing promotional
activity, which contributed to higher unit trust,
broking and custody fees.
• There was an increase in cards in issue, which
drove higher transaction volumes and balances
and led to a 16 per cent rise in card fee income,
principally in the US;
•
Strong equity market performance also
benefited HSBC’s asset management activities.
Funds under management grew by 16 per cent
and performance fees rose strongly, most
143
notably in HSBC’s BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India
and China) funds and in the Hermitage Fund, a
leading fund investing in Russia.
• The successful promotion of packaged account
products which, together with increased
customer numbers and higher transaction
volumes, led to a 13 per cent rise in account
services fees. Higher cross-border currency
flows led to increased remittance income.
• Reduced sales of creditor insurance products in
the UK were largely offset by higher fees in
HSBC’s Latin American insurance businesses,
particularly in Argentina and Brazil.
•
Increased taxpayer services fees, higher income
from investment and other services provided by
HSBC’s insurance businesses, and increased
corporate and WTAS advisory fees in the US
contributed to the increase in other fee income.
In Europe, account service fees increased as a
result of customer acquisition, higher sales of
packaged products and increased transaction
volumes. Rising stock markets led to higher sales of
investment products and growth in funds under
management, while product mix improvements and
service enhancements also contributed to a rise in
investment fees. Higher performance fees in respect
of the Hermitage Fund contributed an additional
US$23 million in fee income, net of performance
fees paid to the fund’s investment advisor. Offsetting
these increases, HSBC’s decision to constrain
unsecured lending growth in the UK resulted in
lower creditor protection insurance fees.
In Hong Kong, a buoyant IPO market together
with product launches and enhancements contributed
to higher sales of investment products; this was
augmented by increased transaction volumes
following strong growth in local and regional equity
markets. As global customers continued to seek
investment opportunities in emerging markets, funds
under management increased. Growth in cards in
issue led to higher card fees.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, higher trade and
remittance flows led to increased payments and cash
management income. Investment flows into
emerging market funds triggered growth in custody
and funds administration fees, while rising equity
markets and product launches contributed to
increased investor demand and higher income from
custody, brokerage and the sale of investments.
In North America, card fees increased as a
result of higher balances and improved interchange
rates, while private label card fees benefited from
renegotiations with a number of merchants.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Net trading income
Increases in 2006 were partly offset by the effect of
FFIEC guidance, which limits certain fee billings for
non-prime credit card accounts. Following its launch
in 2005, activity within HSBC’s mortgage-backed
securities business increased rapidly during 2006. As
a result, a greater proportion of loans originated by
HSBC were sold to the secondary market and
mortgage servicing fees grew accordingly, while
income in the mortgage-backed securities business
also rose. Tariff increases contributed to higher
account service fees. Higher business volumes led to
a rise in taxpayer services fees, while the WTAS
Net trading income
business progressed strongly, expanding its customer
base and reporting significantly higher fee income.
In Latin America, increased cards in circulation
and improvements in activation times led to higher
card issuing fees, while growth in the merchant
customer base led to a rise in card acquiring income.
Account servicing fees benefited from higher
packaged account sales, enhancements to other
current account products, price increases and greater
transaction volumes. The expansion of HSBC’s
ATM network in Mexico drove higher ATM fees.
By geographical region
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
2007
US$m
%
6,943
1,242
1,643
(542)
548
70.6
12.6
16.7
(5.5)
5.6
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
4,529
617
1,181
1,358
537
%
55.1
7.5
14.4
16.5
6.5
2005
US$m
3,036
546
860
885
537
%
51.7
9.3
14.7
15.1
9.2
Net trading income1 ....................................
9,834 100.0
8,222 100.0
5,864 100.0
Trading activities .............................................................................................
Net interest income on trading activities .........................................................
Other trading income
Hedge ineffectiveness:
– on cash flow hedges ...............................................................................
– on fair value hedges ...............................................................................
Non-qualifying hedges ....................................................................................
Net trading income1 .........................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
4,521
5,376
(77)
19
(5)
9,834
2006
US$m
5,465
2,603
(122)
16
260
8,222
2005
US$m
3,884
2,208
(96)
14
(146)
5,864
1 The cost of internal funding of trading assets increased by US$2.8 billion and is excluded from the reported ‘Net trading income’ line
and included in ‘Net interest income’. However, this cost is reinstated in ‘Net trading income’ in HSBC’s customer group and global
business reporting.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Net trading income increased by 20 per cent to
US$9.8 billion, 13 per cent on an underlying basis.
The following commentary is on an underlying
basis.
In line with Global Banking and Markets’ focus
on emerging markets, total income from trading in
Asia and Latin America increased by 42 per cent,
dominated by foreign exchange trading and
reflecting the benefit of HSBC’s strong and
diversified distribution network.
from deterioration in the credit market in the second
half of the year. The write-downs arose mainly in the
US and, to a lesser extent, the UK.
Income from foreign exchange trading increased
by 40 per cent, a record result. Revenues were driven
by higher customer volumes, against the backdrop of
a weakening US dollar and greater market volatility.
A trading loss of US$419 million in Credit and
Rates compared with income of US$1.3 billion in
2006. US$1.1 billion of this arose in the second half
of 2007. This was due to the write-downs discussed
above.
Net trading income was significantly affected by
Trading income from structured derivatives fell
a total of US$2.1 billion of write-downs on credit
trading, leveraged and acquisition financing
positions, and monoline credit exposures resulting
by 26 per cent. The structured credit business
incurred losses in the second half of the year due to
the difficult trading conditions described above.
144
market volatility and a decrease in deal volumes in
the third quarter.
Income from structured derivatives grew by
74 per cent, as investments in technical expertise and
systems enabled HSBC to address a broader
spectrum of client needs. Increased market volatility,
together with expansion in the provision of
structured fund products, resulted in higher customer
volumes. As the business matured and markets
deepened and became more transparent, revenues
were boosted by a rise of US$193 million in the
recognition of income deferred in previous periods.
Foreign exchange income remained strong
throughout 2006, principally driven by an increase in
customer activity encouraged by US dollar weakness
and volatility in emerging markets. In the metals
trading business, revenues doubled, primarily due to
the underlying strength in precious metals and
increased price volatility.
Within the credit and rates business, higher
gains from interest rate derivatives and emerging
market bonds reflected increased volumes of new
deals, a tightening of credit spreads and greater
interest rate volatility.
In Europe, a significant increase in trading
income was driven by higher foreign exchange flows
and a greater focus on emerging market products.
Overall, customer volumes rose, as increased
hedging activity and a change in risk appetite among
investors drove a general improvement in market
sentiment towards developing economies.
On an underlying basis trading income in Rest
of Asia-Pacific grew by 35 per cent, driven by
HSBC’s strong distribution network and experience
in developing markets activity, which contributed to
particularly strong increases reported in India the
Middle East and mainland China.
Performance in HSBC’s operations in the US
remained robust benefiting, in part, from the first full
year contribution from the US residential mortgage-
backed securities business and successful product
launches in structured derivatives.
This was partly offset by higher trading income from
other structured derivative products, following
investment made in technical expertise and systems
in previous years.
Record results were achieved in the equities
business reflecting strong growth across all regions
particularly in Europe, which benefited from
effective product differentiation, notably in
emerging market products.
In Europe, trading income increased by 41 per
cent, driven by the equities business and foreign
exchange trading, where income increased strongly,
with volume and profitability driven by market
volatility. This was partly offset by the write-downs
in credit, structured derivatives and leveraged and
acquisition finance.
Net trading income in Europe increased
following the strategic decision to expand the
collateralised lending and structured derivatives
businesses, the funding costs of which are reported
in ‘Net interest income’.
Income growth in Hong Kong was achieved
throughout the Global Markets business, assisted by
investments made in recent years to grow the
product range and customer base. HSBC had only
very limited exposure to asset-based securities and
structured credit products in Hong Kong.
Strong growth was delivered in Rest of Asia-
Pacific, led by foreign exchange trading, with higher
volumes driven by increased volatility which, in
turn, increased customer demand for risk
management products.
HSBC’s operations in North America incurred
a trading loss following write-downs in credit,
structured derivatives, and leveraged and acquisition
finance for the reasons noted above. This was
compounded by trading losses on purchased loans
in the mortgage services wholesale business in
response to which, HSBC closed the business.
By contrast, foreign exchange recorded a strong
performance, supported by activity generated by
the declining US dollar and volatile markets.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net trading income increased significantly in
comparison with 2005, reflecting the investment
made in widening Global Markets’ product range
and developing its sales and execution capabilities.
Positive revenue trends were recorded in key product
areas, although the rate of income growth slowed in
the second half of the year, principally due to lower
145
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value
Year ended
31 December 2007
Net income
US$m
By geographical region
Europe ........................................................................................
Hong Kong ................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ...................................................................
North America ...........................................................................
Latin America ............................................................................
1,226
676
111
1,750
320
%
30.0
16.6
2.7
42.9
7.8
4,083
100.0
Year ended
31 December 2006
Net income
US$m
By geographical region
Europe ........................................................................................
Hong Kong ................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ...................................................................
North America ...........................................................................
Latin America ............................................................................
144
260
79
(63)
237
%
21.9
39.6
12.0
(9.6)
36.1
657
100.0
Year ended
31 December 2005
Net income
US$m
By geographical region
Europe ........................................................................................
Hong Kong ................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ...................................................................
North America ...........................................................................
Latin America ............................................................................
362
(6)
58
434
186
%
35.0
(0.6)
5.6
42.0
18.0
Net income/(expense) arising from:
– financial assets held to meet liabilities under insurance and
investment contracts ................................................................................
– liabilities to customers under investment contracts ................................
– HSBC’s long-term debt issued and related derivatives ..........................
– change in own credit spread on long-term debt ...................................
– other changes in fair value ...................................................................
– other instruments designated at fair value and related derivatives .........
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ....................
1,034
100.0
15,046
2007
US$m
2,056
(940)
2,812
3,055
(243)
155
4,083
2006
US$m
1,552
(1,008)
(35)
(388)
353
148
657
HSBC adopted ‘Amendment to IAS 39 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement: the Fair
Value Option’ with effect from 1 January 2005.
HSBC may designate financial instruments at fair
value under the option in order to remove or reduce
accounting mismatches in measurement or
recognition, or where financial instruments are
managed, and their performance is evaluated,
together on a fair value basis. All income and
expense on financial instruments for which the fair
value option was taken were included in this line
except for issued debt securities and related
derivatives, where the interest components were
shown in interest expense.
HSBC used the fair value designation principally
in the following instances:
•
for certain fixed-rate long-term debt issues
whose interest rate characteristic has been
changed to floating through interest rate swaps,
as part of a documented interest rate
management strategy. Approximately
146
At
31 December 2007
Assets
US$m
Liabilities
US$m
30,058
7,253
886
–
3,367
41,564
50,077
4,412
501
34,949
–
89,939
At
31 December 2006
Assets
US$m
Liabilities
US$m
12,164
4,745
1,729
–
1,935
20,573
32,630
4,291
410
32,880
–
70,211
At
31 December 2005
Assets
US$m
Liabilities
US$m
9,077
3,909
872
–
1,188
27,442
3,999
300
29,934
154
61,829
2005
US$m
1,760
(1,126)
403
(70)
473
(3)
1,034
US$66 billion (2006: US$56 billion) of the
Group’s debt issues have been accounted for
using the fair value option. The movement in
fair value of these debt issues includes the
effect of own credit spread changes and any
ineffectiveness in the economic relationship
between the related swaps and own debt;
as credit spreads narrow, accounting losses are
booked, and the reverse is true in the event of
spreads widening. Ineffectiveness arises from the
different credit characteristics of the swap and
own debt coupled with the sensitivity of the
floating leg of the swap to changes in short-term
interest rates. In addition, the economic
relationship between the swap and own debt can
be affected by relative movements in market
factors, such as bond and swap rates, and the
relative bond and swap rates at inception.
The size and direction of the accounting
consequences of changes in own credit spread
and ineffectiveness can be volatile from period
to period, but do not alter the cash flows
envisaged as part of the documented interest
rate management strategy;
for certain financial assets held by insurance
operations and managed at fair value to meet
liabilities under insurance contracts, and certain
liabilities under investment contracts with
discretionary participation features (‘DPF’),
approximately US$17 billion of assets (2006:
US$6 billion); and
for financial assets held by insurance operations
and managed at fair value to meet liabilities
under investment contracts, approximately
US$14 billion of assets (2006: US$12 billion).
•
•
•
Net income from financial assets designated at
fair value which are held to support liabilities for
both insurance and investment contracts, is presented
as ‘Net income from financial instruments designated
at fair value’. For investment contracts, where the
liabilities to policyholders are designated at fair
value, the movement in the value of the liabilities is
presented in ‘Net income from financial instruments
designated at fair value’ in the income statement.
However, for insurance contracts, the movement in
liabilities arising from the net income allocated to
the policyholder is presented in ‘Net insurance
claims incurred and movement in liabilities to
policyholders’.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Credit spreads widened significantly in the second
half of 2007, leading to a substantial increase in net
income from financial instruments designated at fair
value compared with 2006. This was primarily driven
by a widening in credit spreads on certain fixed-rate
long-term debt, issued by HSBC Holdings and its
subsidiaries. These cumulative gains will fully
reverse over the life of the debt. The cumulative
adjustment to reserves where the policy is applied for
the first time and, subsequently, the income statement
in terms of change in own credit spread since the fair
value option was available, is US$1.6 billion after
taking account of the US$3.1 billion credit in 2007.
Income from assets held to meet liabilities under
insurance and investment contracts also rose by
32 per cent, mostly from premium growth and higher
investment returns on the portfolios held by the
insurance businesses in the UK and Hong Kong.
The change in fair value of liabilities under
investment contracts declined by 7 per cent.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net income from financial instruments designated at
fair value decreased compared with 2005. This was
primarily driven by a narrowing (i.e. improvement)
in credit spreads on certain fixed-rate long-term debt
issued by HSBC Finance and lower net mark-to-
market movements on this debt and the related
interest rate swaps. During 2006, HSBC Finance’s
debt received improved ratings from both Moody’s
and S&P. Perversely, this improvement generated
accounting losses of some US$388 million which
will reverse over the residual maturity of the debt
instruments.
Income from assets held to meet liabilities under
insurance and investment contracts was some 12 per
cent lower, reflecting movements in the market
values of assets. The increase in the fair value of
liabilities under investment contracts was 10 per
cent lower than in 2005.
147
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Gains less losses from financial investments / Net earned insurance premiums
Gains less losses from financial investments
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
Gains less losses from financial
2007
US$m
1,326
94
38
245
253
%
67.9
4.8
1.9
12.5
12.9
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
624
162
41
58
84
%
64.4
16.7
4.2
6.0
8.7
2005
US$m
439
108
18
47
80
%
63.4
15.6
2.6
6.8
11.6
investments ..........................................
1,956
100.0
969
100.0
692
100.0
Net gain from disposal of:
– debt securities ...............................................................................................
– equity securities ............................................................................................
– other financial investments ...........................................................................
Recovery of impairment losses .......................................................................
Gains less losses from financial investments ..................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
120
1,822
14
1,956
–
1,956
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
252
702
15
969
–
969
138
505
7
650
42
692
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Net gains of US$2.0 billion were reported by HSBC
as a result of the disposal of financial investments
during 2007, 102 per cent higher than in 2006,
93 per cent on an underlying basis. The following
commentary is on an underlying basis.
In Europe, the sale of shareholdings and
various equity investments in the UK and France,
including the disposal of shares in Euronext (the
European stock exchange), contributed to net gains
of US$1.3 billion, an increase of 101 per cent from
2006. In Private Banking, gains of US$91 million
arose from the sale of a further holding in the
Hermitage Fund, compared with US$117 million in
2006.
In Hong Kong, gains were 42 per cent less than
in 2006 as a result of the non-recurrence of a
US$101 million gain on the partial sale of HSBC’s
stake in UTI Bank Limited, an Indian retail bank, in
that year.
Gains of US$245 million in North America
were primarily attributable to the sale of shares in
MasterCard and gains in Latin America largely
arose from the sale of equity holdings in Brazil,
including HSBC’s holding in a credit bureau.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
HSBC reported net gains of US$969 million from
the disposal of available-for-sale financial
investments during 2006, 40 per cent higher than in
2005. On an underlying basis, gains were 35 per cent
greater than in 2005. Gains from financial
investments were mainly attributable to the
following transactions:
•
•
•
•
a gain of US$93 million arising from the partial
redemption of HSBC’s investment in
MasterCard Incorporated following its IPO in
May. The gain was distributed across all
geographic regions as most HSBC Group banks
were members of MasterCard;
a gain of US$101 million on the sale of part of
HSBC’s stake in UTI Bank Limited, an Indian
retail bank;
the partial sale by Private Banking of a holding
in the Hermitage Fund contributed a gain of
US$117 million for the year; and
the sale of a portfolio of structured finance
investments, classified as debt securities,
contributed a gain of US$112 million.
Gains arising from dilution of interests in
associates
HSBC’s associates, Industrial Bank, Ping An
Insurance and Bank of Communications in mainland
China; Financiera Independencia in Mexico and
Techcombank in Vietnam, issued new shares for
which HSBC did not subscribe. As a consequence of
the new monies raised by the associates, HSBC’s
share of their underlying assets increased by
US$1.1 billion, notwithstanding the reduction in the
148
Group’s interests. These gains are presented in the
income statement as ‘Gains from dilution of the
Group’s interests in associates’, and should be
Net earned insurance premiums
regarded as exceptional. For further details see
Note 4 on the Financial Statements.
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
2007
US$m
4,010
2,797
226
449
1,594
%
44.2
30.8
2.5
4.9
17.6
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
1,298
2,628
174
492
1,076
%
22.9
46.3
3.1
8.7
19.0
2005
US$m
1,599
2,334
155
477
871
%
29.4
42.9
2.9
8.8
16.0
Net earned insurance premiums ..............
9,076 100.0
5,668 100.0
5,436 100.0
Gross insurance premium income ...................................................................
Reinsurance premiums ....................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ......................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
11,001
(1,925)
9,076
2006
US$m
6,455
(787)
5,668
2005
US$m
6,152
(716)
5,436
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Net earned insurance premiums of US$9.1 billion
were 60 per cent higher than in 2006. This was
boosted by HSBC’s acquisition in the first half of
2007 of the remaining shares in HSBC Assurances in
France and the purchase of HSBC Bank Panama in
Central America in late 2006. Underlying net
insurance premiums grew by 21 per cent. The
following commentary is on an underlying basis.
In Europe, net earned insurance premiums
increased by 50 per cent to US$4.0 billion, including
growth of the Guaranteed Income Bond and motor
insurance, and the introduction of enhanced death
benefits to pension contracts in the UK. Premiums
also grew in the UK because of a higher retention of
risk compared with 2006, when a greater proportion
of risk and corresponding premiums were ceded to
reinsurers. There were also significant contributions
from increased reinsurance business in Ireland and
from the life assurance business in Malta.
In Hong Kong, net earned insurance premiums
increased by 7 per cent to US$2.8 billion, as the life
assurance business expanded with the launch of new
products.
In the Rest of Asia-Pacific region, net earned
insurance premiums increased by 24 per cent to
US$226 million. This growth was mainly generated
in Malaysia by the HSBC Amanah Takaful business
which was launched in late 2006, offering shariah-
compliant insurance products.
In North America, net earned insurance
premiums decreased by 9 per cent to
US$449 million, as the decline in loan volumes led
to a fall in credit insurance sales and HSBC stopped
reinsuring credit insurance for other lenders.
In Latin America, net earned insurance
premiums increased by 32 per cent to
US$1.6 billion. There was good growth in all of
HSBC’s insurance businesses in the region. Higher
premiums in Brazil were driven by increased sales
of pension products with linked-life policies. In
Argentina, the growth was led by the motor
insurance businesses and, in Mexico, the primary
driver was life assurance.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net earned insurance premiums of US$5.7 billion
were 4 per cent higher than in 2005, 3 per cent on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows is on
an underlying basis.
In Europe, net earned premium income
decreased by 19 per cent to US$1.3 billion. This
was largely in the UK, where lower sales of single
premium insurance contracts, a lower market
appreciation of investment assets and the effect of
changes in reinsurance arrangements were the
principal drivers of the decrease.
In Hong Kong, net earned premium income
increased by 13 per cent, driven by the life insurance
business. New products, many designed to meet
149
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other operating income
financial needs identified in HSBC’s global study on
the future of retirement, were supported by increased
promotional and marketing activity, and the
development of internet and telephone distribution
channels. Sales rose in consequence.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, net earned
premium income rose by 5 per cent growth to
US$174 million. This was concentrated in Singapore
and reflected the success of new product launches,
supported by increased marketing. Increased sales of
individual life policies were the main driver of the
growth. HSBC continued to expand its insurance
business across Rest of Asia-Pacific with a number
of initiatives including the establishment of HSBC’s
first Islamic insurance company in Malaysia.
In North America, the modest rise in net
premium income to US$492 million reflected growth
Other operating income
2007
US$m
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
Intra-HSBC elimination ...........................
Other operating income ...........................
1,193
845
798
360
228
3,424
(1,985)
1,439
Rent received ...................................................................................................
Gains recognised on assets held for sale .........................................................
Valuation gains on investment properties .......................................................
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and
non-financial investments ...........................................................................
Gain on disposal of operating leases ...............................................................
Change in present value of in-force long-term insurance business ................
Other ................................................................................................................
Other operating income ...................................................................................
from new life business underwritten in 2006, which
was substantially offset by a decline in the non-life
business.
Improved cross-selling drove growth across
Latin America, and income rose by 18 per cent to
US$1.1 billion. In Mexico, growth in individual life,
casualty and motor insurance was partly offset by
increased reinsurance costs. In Brazil, growth was
led by strong sales of both life and pension products.
In Argentina, increased advertising partnerships with
established local consumer brands and internal cross-
selling initiatives led to a rise in motor, home and
extended-warranty insurance premium income. This
was, in part, offset by the effects of the disposal of
the Brazilian general insurer HSBC Seguros during
the latter half of 2005, which resulted in a significant
reduction in non-life premium income.
Year ended 31 December
%
34.8
24.7
23.3
10.5
6.7
100.0
100.0
%
35.4
20.6
18.9
22.8
2.3
2006
US$m
1,428
834
765
922
91
4,040
(1,494)
2,546
2007
US$m
630
5
152
213
–
(145)
584
1,439
2005
US$m
1,603
805
335
642
286
%
43.7
21.9
9.1
17.5
7.8
3,671 100.0
(938)
2,733
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
687
28
164
781
–
40
846
2005
US$m
859
11
201
703
26
40
893
2,546
2,733
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Other operating income of US$1.4 billion was 43 per
cent lower than in 2006, 51 per cent lower on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows is on
an underlying basis.
In Europe, other operating income declined by
25 per cent. This largely resulted from a negative
movement in the value of in-force business in the
UK insurance business. The movement was driven
by a change in the calculation methodology of the
PVIF business in the first half of 2007 as HSBC
implemented regulatory changes to the rules
governing the calculation of insurance liabilities.
This had a marginally positive effect on profits as
there was a corresponding reduction in policyholder
liabilities.
Private equity income decreased significantly,
due to the non-recurrence of asset disposals in 2006.
Property gains included a gain on the disposal and
leaseback of a London building in 2007.
150
Although HSBC sold its Canary Wharf
headquarters building at 8 Canada Square in 2007,
the gain remains unrecognised as HSBC continues to
provide bridge finance for the debt portion of the
transaction.
In Hong Kong, there was an increase of 2 per
cent in other operating income, mainly due to
increased cost recoveries from other HSBC sites.
This was partially offset by the non-recurrence of
income on the sale of the former head office building
of Hang Seng Bank and transfer of credit card
acquiring business into a joint venture with Global
Payments Inc.
Other operating income in Rest of Asia-Pacific
decreased by 2 per cent. The comparative figures
included gains on disposals of certain businesses
in Australia. No such gains on disposals were
registered this year. Similarly, profits from disposal
of assets held for sale decreased due to the non-
recurrence of profits on sale of properties in Japan
and India.
In North America, other operating income
decreased significantly, driven by lower prices on
sale of real estate due to the general decline in the
property market. In addition, there were lower
gains on the sale of investments, mainly due to a
significant one-off gain in the latter part of 2006.
In Latin America, a 97 per cent increase in
other operating income reflected the recognition of
the embedded value calculation on the PVIF life
assurance business in Mexico. The improvement on
2006 was also aided by the non-recurrence of a loss
on sale of a portfolio of assets during that year and
sundry gains on foreclosed assets in 2007.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Other operating income of US$2.5 billion was 7 per
cent lower than in 2005, 9 per cent lower on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows is on
an underlying basis.
In Europe, other operating income declined
by 14 per cent. This largely resulted from the non-
recurrence of one-off gains from the restructuring
and syndication of assets in Global Investment
Banking in 2005. Gains on private equity were also
lower. There was a 29 per cent fall in rental income,
with a compensating effect on operating expenses,
following the sale of the operational functions of
HSBC’s vehicle financing and fleet management
business in 2005, combined with the non-recurrence
of gains made in that year on disposal of structured
finance leases in the UK. This decline was partly
offset by profit recognised on the sale of HSBC’s
stake in Cyprus Popular Bank Limited of
US$93 million, and income from UK branch sale
and lease-back transactions.
In Hong Kong, the modest increase in other
operating income reflected profits earned from the
sale of the former head office building of Hang Seng
Bank and income received from the transfer of the
credit card acquiring business into a joint venture
between HSBC and Global Payments Inc. These
factors were partly offset by lower revaluation gains
on Hang Seng Bank’s investment properties
following a slowdown in the rate of property price
appreciation and the non-recurrence of the disposal
of a leasehold residential property.
Other operating income in Rest of Asia-Pacific
more than doubled, reflecting profits earned from
various business disposals in Australia and the sale
of an office building in Japan. Higher levels of
activity at the Group Service Centres resulted in
rising income in the region and contributed further
to the increase.
In North America, the 42 per cent increase
largely resulted from gains on the disposal of various
investments and real estate, and higher lease income
from property investments by Amanah Finance.
The 73 per cent decline in Latin America was
mainly driven by the non-recurrence of the receipt
of coverage bonds issued as compensation for
asymmetric pesification in Argentina last year. The
non-recurrence of the gain on sale of the insurance
underwriter, HSBC Seguros, in Brazil in 2005
(US$89 million) contributed further to the reduction.
151
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Net insurance claims / Loan impairment charges
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
Net insurance claims incurred and
movement in liabilities to
policyholders .......................................
2007
US$m
3,479
3,208
253
241
1,427
%
40.4
37.3
2.9
2.8
16.6
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
531
2,699
192
259
1,023
%
11.3
57.4
4.1
5.5
21.7
2005
US$m
818
2,059
166
232
792
%
20.1
50.6
4.1
5.7
19.5
8,608
100.0
4,704
100.0
4,067
100.0
Gross insurance claims and movement in liabilities to policyholders ............
Reinsurers’ share of claims incurred and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ...............................................................................................
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
9,550
(942)
2006
US$m
5,072
(368)
2005
US$m
4,153
(86)
policyholders1 ..............................................................................................
8,608
4,704
4,067
1 Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders arise from both life and non-life insurance business. For
non-life business, amounts reported represent the cost of claims paid during the year and the estimated cost of notified claims. For life
business, the main element of claims is the liability to policyholders created on the initial underwriting of the policy and any subsequent
movement in the liability that arises, primarily from the attribution of investment performance to savings-related policies. Consequently,
claims rise in line with increases in sales of savings-related business and with investment market growth.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in
liabilities to policyholders of US$8.6 billion were
83 per cent higher than in 2006. In March 2007,
HSBC acquired the remaining shares in HSBC
Assurances in France and purchased HSBC Bank
Panama in late 2006. Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to policyholders
increased by 32 per cent on an underlying basis.
The following commentary is on an underlying
basis.
In Europe, net insurance claims incurred and
movement in liabilities to policyholders grew by
121 per cent to US$3.5 billion. This growth was in
parallel with the growth in net earned insurance
premiums, including maintaining a higher level of
risk, but it was offset by FSA rule changes which led
to lower claims valuation on life policies. There was
also a rise in flood-related claims in the UK after
record rainfalls during the summer.
In Hong Kong, net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to policyholders
increased by 19 per cent to US$3.2 billion. The
increase was more significant than premium growth
because many of the liabilities were related to life
policies. Policyholders participate in the investment
performance of assets supporting these liabilities and
the investment return on these assets is shown in
‘Net income from financial instruments designated at
fair value’.
In the Rest of Asia-Pacific region, net
insurance claims incurred and movement in
liabilities to policyholders rose by 25 per cent
to US$253 million.
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in
liabilities to policyholders decreased by 7 per cent to
US$241 million in North America, in line with the
change in net earned insurance premiums.
In Latin America, net insurance claims
incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders
grew by 26 per cent to US$1.4 billion. Most of this
increase was in Brazil, driven by a rise in
policyholders’ liabilities on the back of higher life
insurance and pension volumes. Growth in the
Mexico life business also contributed.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in
liabilities to policyholders of US$4.7 billion were
16 per cent higher than in 2005, 15 per cent on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows is on
an underlying basis.
In Europe, net insurance claims incurred and
movement in liabilities to policyholders decreased
152
by 35 per cent to US$531 million, primarily driven
by lower sales of critical illness and creditor
protection products, along with the effect of adverse
movements in fixed interest rate markets on the
value of liabilities to policyholders.
Net insurance claims and movement in
liabilities to policyholders in Hong Kong increased
by 31 per cent, predominantly in the life insurance
business, in which reserves for liabilities to
policyholders rose with business growth, together
with the rising value of investments. Growth in the
underwriting of accident and health business resulted
in higher non-life insurance claims reserves.
Net insurance claims and movement in
liabilities to policyholders in North America rose
by 12 per cent to US$259 million, mainly reflecting
an increase in reserves for new life insurance
business underwritten in 2006.
In Latin America, higher sales of life and
pension fund products led to an increase in net
insurance claims incurred and movement in
liabilities to policyholders of 24 per cent to
US$1,023 million. Lower movements in the non-life
insurance liabilities were due to the sale of the non-
life insurance business, HSBC Seguros, in Brazil
during the latter half of 2005.
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
Total loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ...........................
As a percentage of net operating income
before loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions ..................
Impairment charges on loans and
advances to customers as a percentage
of gross average loans and advances to
customers .............................................
2007
US$m
2,542
231
616
12,156
1,697
%
14.8
1.3
3.6
70.5
9.8
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
2,155
172
512
6,796
938
%
20.4
1.6
4.8
64.3
8.9
2005
US$m
1,929
146
134
4,916
676
%
24.7
1.9
1.7
63.0
8.7
17,242
100.0
10,573
100.0
7,801
100.0
21.8
2.1
16.2
1.4
Year ended 31 December
Loan impairment charges
New allowances net of allowance releases .................................................
Recoveries of amounts previously written off ............................................
Individually assessed allowances ....................................................................
Collectively assessed allowances ....................................................................
Other credit risk provisions .............................................................................
Total loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .....................
Customer impaired loans .................................................................................
Customer loan impairment allowances ...........................................................
2007
US$m
18,182
(1,005)
17,177
796
16,381
65
17,242
18,304
19,205
2006
US$m
11,326
(779)
10,547
458
10,089
26
10,573
13,785
13,578
13.5
1.2
2005
US$m
8,354
(494)
7,860
518
7,342
(59)
7,801
11,446
11,357
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk
provisions were US$17.2 billion, a 63 per cent
increase over 2006. The analysis that follows is on
an underlying basis.
Loan impairment charges increased by 58 per
cent, reflecting:
•
substantially higher losses in the US consumer
finance loan book, primarily in mortgage
lending but also in the credit cards portfolio in
the final part of the year. Delinquency rates
increased during the year as falling house prices
153
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Loan impairment charges
constrained customers’ ability to refinance their
loans and led to deterioration in credit markets;
an underlying 7 per cent increase in lending to
customers (excluding lending to the financial
sector and settlement accounts); and
a sharp increase in loan impairment charges in
Mexico, primarily due to portfolio growth,
seasoning, and higher delinquency rates on
credit cards; offset by
a continued benign environment for commercial
and corporate credit in all regions.
•
•
•
In Europe, loan impairment charges rose by
10 per cent to US$2.5 billion. Overall credit quality
remained broadly stable. In the UK, loan impairment
charges rose, primarily in consumer finance lending
outside HSBC Bank; within HSBC Bank, steps taken
in 2006 to tighten underwriting standards led to an
improvement in loan impairment trends. Corporate
loan impairment charges remained low in absolute
terms although they were 23 per cent higher than the
level incurred in 2006. In the UK, increased loan
impairment charges principally reflected allowances
on two large corporate accounts and the ongoing
effect of IVAs on the micro business segment.
Loan impairment charges in Hong Kong
continued at a low level and in line with 2006 at
US$231 million, despite strong balance sheet
growth. This reflected good credit quality and robust
economic conditions.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, loan impairment
charges rose by 17 per cent to US$616 million. Loan
impairment charges were significantly lower in
Taiwan due to the non-recurrence of impairment
charges in 2006 which resulted from regulatory
intervention in the card market and the imposition of
a government debt negotiation scheme. In Indonesia,
performance improved on 2006 when loan
impairment charges were affected by the
introduction of minimum repayment terms. These
factors were offset by an increase in corporate loan
impairment charges in several countries, higher loan
impairment charges in India due to balance sheet
growth and higher loss rates on credit cards, and a
deterioration in the Malaysian mortgage portfolio
due to rising interest rates.
In North America, loan impairment charges
posted a steep rise, increasing by 79 per cent to
US$12.2 billion. The main factor driving this
deterioration was the impact of the weaker housing
market on both economic activity and the ability of
borrowers to extend or refinance debt. In addition,
seasoning and mix change within the credit cards
portfolio, and increases in bankruptcy filings after
the exceptionally low levels seen in 2006 following
changes in legislation, added to loan impairment
charges.
The real estate secured portfolios experienced
continuing deterioration in credit quality as a lack of
demand for securitised sub-prime mortgages and
falls in house prices severely restricted refinancing
options for many customers. In the mortgage
services business, loan impairment charges rose
by 41 per cent to US$3.1 billion while, in consumer
lending, loan impairment charges rose by 139 per
cent to US$4.1 billion. Delinquency rates exceeded
recent historical trends, particularly for those loans
originated in 2005 and 2006. Performance was
weakest in housing markets which had previously
experienced the steepest home price appreciation and
in respect of second lien products and stated income
products.
US card services experienced a rise in loan
impairment charges from a combination of growth in
balances, higher losses in the final part of the year as
the economy slowed, a rise in bankruptcy rates
approaching historical levels, and a shift in portfolio
mix to higher levels of non-prime loans. Further
details are provided on page 220.
In Latin America, loan impairment charges
rose sharply, by 53 per cent to US$1.7 billion, driven
by portfolio growth, normal seasoning and higher
delinquency rates on credit cards. Loan impairment
charges for small and medium-sized businesses
lending in Mexico also increased. Partly offsetting
these was an improvement in personal and
commercial delinquency rates in Brazil.
For the Group as a whole, the aggregate
outstanding customer loan impairment allowances
at 31 December 2007 of US$19.2 billion represented
2.0 per cent of gross customer advances (net of
reverse repos and settlement accounts), compared
with 1.6 per cent at year-end 2006.
Impaired loans to customers were
US$18.3 billion at 31 December 2007 compared
with US$13.8 billion at 31 December 2006. On a
constant currency basis, impaired loans to customers
were 28 per cent higher than in 2006 compared with
customer lending growth (excluding loans to the
financial sector and settlement accounts) of
7 per cent.
154
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
The charge for loan impairments and other credit
risk provisions was US$10.6 billion, a 36 per cent
increase over that reported in 2005. The analysis that
follows is on an underlying basis.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Charges increased by 30 per cent, reflecting:
increased loss experience in the US mortgage
services business, particularly in second lien,
portions of first lien and ARMs acquired from
correspondent brokers and banks in 2005 and in
the first half of 2006;
10 per cent underlying lending growth
(excluding lending to the financial sector and
settlement accounts), notably in the UK, the US,
Mexico, Brazil and Asia;
the continuing effect in the UK of consumer
recourse to formal debt mitigation
arrangements;
credit deterioration, principally in the first half
of 2006, in unsecured personal and credit card
lending in Taiwan and Indonesia; offset by
the non-recurrence of a surge in bankruptcy
filings in the US in the fourth quarter of 2005
and the effect of hurricane Katrina; and
a continued benign commercial and corporate
credit environment.
In Europe, net loan impairment charges rose by
10 per cent to US$2.2 billion. In the UK, net charges
rose by a modest 4 per cent as growth in the personal
customer impairment charge, which was broadly in
line with lending growth, was partially offset by
favourable movements on the impairment charge for
commercial loans in a robust corporate credit
environment. The personal sector continued to
experience higher levels of IVA and bankruptcy
filings, following an easing of bankruptcy
regulations in 2004, growth in consumer
indebtedness and a rise in unemployment. This was
mitigated by action taken on underwriting and
collections. In France, the non-recurrence of several
significant recoveries in 2005 resulted in an increase
in net loan impairment charges in 2006.
Loan impairment charges in Hong Kong
remained low at US$172 million, underpinned by
robust personal and commercial credit quality in a
strong economy with low unemployment.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, loan impairment
charges rose sharply to US$512 million. Taiwan and
Indonesia experienced credit deterioration during
2006, although the problem peaked in the first half
155
of the year. Taiwan was affected by the imposition
of a mandatory government debt renegotiation
scheme which allowed customers to extend and
heavily discount repayment terms, leading to
market-wide credit losses. Indonesia was also
affected by regulations, specifically with respect to
minimum re-payment terms which compounded
higher impairments brought about by a reduction in
fuel subsidies. Elsewhere in Rest of Asia-Pacific,
credit quality was stable.
In North America, the net loan impairment
charge increased significantly, by 32 per cent to
US$6.8 billion, largely in the second half of 2006,
driven by the credit deterioration in US sub-prime
mortgages described in the first bullet point above.
The effects of the decline in US house price inflation
and rising interest rates during 2006 were
accentuated by the increased percentage of second
lien loan originations to total loans originated in
2005 and the first half of 2006, and the underwriting
of stated income (low documentation) products. The
US net loan impairment charges increased by 37 per
cent after taking into account the most recent trends
in delinquency and loss severity, projecting the
probable impact of re-pricing ARMs, and
incorporating the effect of re-pricing on second lien
loans. Further details are provided on page 217.
Credit delinquency in other parts of the mortgage
portfolio and in other US businesses rose modestly,
driven by unusually low levels at the end of 2005,
and growing loan maturity in 2006. Partially
offsetting the effects of credit deterioration were a
decline in bankruptcy filings following the surge at
the end of 2005, relatively low unemployment and a
fall in exposure estimated to result from hurricane
Katrina.
In Latin America, the rise in impairment
charges by 24 per cent to US$938 million was
largely recorded in Mexico and, to a lesser extent,
Brazil and Argentina. In Mexico, strong loan growth,
particularly in 2006, led to increased loan
impairment charges. In Brazil, the credit weaknesses
seen in 2005 and the first half of 2006, particularly
in the consumer market, were mitigated by changes
to underwriting procedures. Net charges in Brazil
increased by 7 per cent compared with 54 per cent in
2005 and declined in the second half of 2006
compared with the first half. In Argentina, net
charges rose as a result of the non-recurrence of
releases and recoveries in 2005.
The aggregate outstanding customer loan
impairment allowances at 31 December 2006 of
US$13.6 billion represented 1.6 per cent of gross
customer advances (net of reverse repos and
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Operating expenses
settlement accounts), compared with 1.5 per cent at
the same time in 2005.
Impaired loans to customers were
US$13.8 billion at 31 December 2006
compared with US$11.4 billion at 31 December
2005. On a constant currency basis, impaired loans
were 14 per cent higher than in 2005 compared with
lending growth (excluding loans to the financial
sector and settlement accounts) of 10 per cent.
Operating expenses
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
2007
US$m
16,525
3,780
4,764
10,556
5,402
%
40.3
9.2
11.6
25.7
13.2
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
13,871
3,269
3,548
10,193
4,166
%
39.6
9.3
10.1
29.1
11.9
2005
US$m
12,639
2,867
2,762
8,758
3,426
%
41.4
9.4
9.1
28.8
11.3
41,027 100.0
35,047 100.0
30,452 100.0
Intra-HSBC elimination ...........................
Total operating expenses .........................
(1,985)
39,042
(1,494)
33,553
(938)
29,514
By expense category
Employee compensation and benefits1 ............................................................
Premises and equipment (excluding depreciation and impairment) ...............
General and administrative expenses ..............................................................
Administrative expenses ..................................................................................
Depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment ....................
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets ..........................................
Total operating expenses .................................................................................
Staff numbers (full-time equivalent)
Europe ..............................................................................................................
Hong Kong ......................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .........................................................................................
North America .................................................................................................
Latin America2 .................................................................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
21,334
3,966
11,328
36,628
1,714
700
39,042
2007
82,166
27,655
88,573
52,722
64,404
2006
US$m
18,500
3,389
9,434
31,323
1,514
716
33,553
At 31 December
2006
78,311
27,586
72,265
55,642
64,900
2005
US$m
16,145
2,977
8,206
27,328
1,632
554
29,514
2005
77,755
25,931
55,577
53,608
55,600
Total staff numbers ..........................................................................................
315,520
298,704
268,471
1 A charge of US$135 million was realised in 2006 arising from the waiver of the TSR-related performance condition in respect of the
2003 awards under the HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan (‘the Plan’). As explained in the Annual Report and Accounts 2005,
in light of the impressive and sustained performance and shareholder returns over the three years covered by the 2003 awards, the
Group Remuneration Committee exercised its discretion, as permitted within the Plan, to waive the TSR performance condition. Under
IFRSs, this is treated as a modification which requires an additional accounting charge: this is a non-cash item.
2 Comparative information for 2006 has been restated to bring numbers for Latin America into line with the criteria for the recognition of
full-time equivalent staff used in 2007.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Operating expenses increased by US$5.5 billion to
US$39.0 billion. On an underlying basis, cost growth
was 10 per cent, the main drivers being:
• Costs rose in Europe, mainly driven by staff
costs in the UK and France and non-staff costs
in the UK. The increase in staff costs was driven
by a mixture of higher staff benefits and higher
headcount in the region. A change in actuarial
assumptions regarding the employees’ defined
contribution pension scheme in the UK also
contributed to the increase. General and
administrative expenses were driven by ex
gratia payments expensed in respect of overdraft
fees applied in previous years and a provision
for reimbursement of certain charges on historic
will trusts and other related services, both in the
UK.
156
• Staff costs in Asia rose as additional staff
numbers were deployed in support of business
expansion. Increased salaries reflected the
buoyant economic conditions in the region and
higher performance pay.
•
•
In North America, costs increased marginally.
Origination activities were curtailed or closed
in certain segments of consumer finance.
The resultant restructuring costs totalled
US$103 million. In Global Banking and
Markets, there was lower performance pay
partly offset by exit costs on the closure of the
mortgage-backed trading business.
In meeting its commitment to expand operations
in fast growing economies, the Group incurred
investment expenditure across Asia and Latin
America. In the Rest of Asia-Pacific region,
costs increased, mainly in the Middle East, India
and mainland China, as the branch network was
extended. New initiatives were implemented to
expand the Group’s consumer finance, HSBC
Direct and cards businesses. Similarly, in Latin
America costs increased from the expansion of
the distribution platform, supported by
incremental marketing expenditure which
delivered higher transactional volumes with
related revenues and costs.
In Europe, costs increased by 10 per cent,
compared with an equivalent growth in net operating
income before loan impairment charges. In the UK, a
change in actuarial assumptions regarding the staff
defined benefit pension scheme led to increased
costs. Ex gratia payments were expensed in respect
of overdraft fees applied in previous years and a
provision for reimbursement of certain charges on
historic will trusts and other related services was
raised. Costs also increased on investments in
technology, investing in straight-through processing
and branch refurbishment. Costs rose in payments
and cash management on higher transaction
volumes. Operational costs rose in Global Markets,
particularly structured derivatives, where the French
business invested to support revenue growth. In
France, the IT systems inherited with the acquisition
of HSBC France were successfully replaced with
HSBC’s universal banking platform. In Turkey,
investment in physical and technical infrastructure
and additional headcount in support of business
growth also contributed to increased costs.
In Hong Kong, operating expenses increased by
16 per cent, compared with growth of 32 per cent in
net operating income before loan impairment
charges. Staff costs increased by 23 per cent on wage
inflation and the recruitment of additional staff to
157
support business expansion, mainly in Commercial
Banking and Global Banking and Markets.
Performance-related bonuses increased in response
to revenue growth. Increased marketing and IT costs
reflected business growth and the launch of new
initiatives. As commercial rents rose in Hong Kong’s
dynamic economy, property rental costs increased,
the effect magnified by a sale and leaseback
agreement on a headquarters building in 2006.
Operating costs increased by 28 per cent in
Rest of Asia-Pacific in line with the increase in net
operating income before loan impairment charges.
Business expansion continued throughout the region.
Staff costs in India, mainland China and the
Middle East rose on increases in headcount and
performance-related bonuses due to higher revenue
generation. Business expansion initiatives were
taken in mainland China where an additional 27 new
branches or sub-branches were opened. In India,
branch network, consumer finance and credit card
business were expanded. Marketing, technology and
infrastructure costs were incurred in support of
business expansion.
In North America, operating expenses
increased by 3 per cent, compared with growth in net
operating income before loan impairment charges of
5 per cent. The retail bank branch network was
extended both within and beyond the Group’s
traditional spheres of operation to support the
expansion of retail and Commercial Banking
businesses. Premises and equipment expenses rose
as a consequence. The business incurred
US$70 million of one-off costs arising from the
indemnification agreement with Visa ahead of Visa’s
planned IPO. Communication expenses increased
due to higher mailing volumes on cards and
consumer lending. In the third quarter, expenditure
on card marketing declined in line with a decision to
slow lending growth in these portfolios. The
consumer finance business incurred restructuring
charges resulting from the discontinuation of the
wholesale and correspondent channels in mortgage
services and the closing of branch offices in
consumer lending. There were corresponding
benefits in origination costs. In Canada operating
expenses rose due to the strategic growth of the bank
branch network. Staff numbers and marketing costs
increased as new branches were opened and new
products were launched. The Canadian consumer
finance business was also restructured in a similar
fashion to the US.
Continuing investment and business expansion
in Latin America resulted in an increase in costs of
15 per cent, compared with growth in net operating
income before loan impairment charges of 20 per
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Operating expenses / Share of profit in associates and joint ventures
cent. Staff costs rose, mainly on higher salaries and
bonuses in the region and one-off costs incurred to
improve operational efficiencies in Brazil. These
were partially offset by a curtailment and settlement
gain from staff transferring from the bank’s defined
benefit healthcare scheme to a new defined
contribution scheme in Mexico. Increases in non-
staff costs included higher marketing expenditure,
costs relating to growth in credit card operations,
higher telecommunication costs and transactional
taxes. Four additional months of Banca Nazionale
also increased total costs.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Operating expenses of US$33.6 billion were
US$4.0 billion, or 14 per cent, higher than in 2005,
and 11 per cent higher on an underlying basis.
The commentary that follows is on an
underlying basis.
The main drivers of cost growth were as
follows:
•
•
various business expansion initiatives were
undertaken during the year. The retail banking
operation in the US was enhanced in the form of
new branches and improved geographical
coverage of Commercial Banking. In the UK,
major work was undertaken to refurbish the
branch network, improve and increase the
number of self-service machines and extend
opening hours in certain branches. Across the
Rest of the Asia-Pacific region, the branch
network expanded, the rollout of the consumer
finance business continued, and Commercial
Banking’s operations were further developed. In
Latin America, improvements were made to
HSBC’s operations in Mexico through the
continued expansion of the branch and ATM
network;
the higher costs incurred in Global Banking and
Markets reflected the first full year effect of
investments made in 2005, together with
volume-driven growth in transactional banking
and securities services activities and
performance-related pay, which rose as
revenues grew. The cost efficiency ratio of
Global Banking and Markets improved by 40
basis points as net operating income before loan
impairment charges grew faster than costs; and
• HSBC’s expenditure on marketing continued in
order to increase brand awareness, grow market
share in key products and support the launch of
new products. Notable successes included the
158
online savings product in the US, strong growth
in credit card acquisition across the Group, and
an innovative new online mortgage product
offered in Mexico.
The following points are also of note.
In Europe, the cost growth of 9 per cent was
concentrated in Personal Financial Services and
Global Banking and Markets. In Personal Financial
Services, business expansion across the region drove
the expenditure. In the UK, costs rose as the branch
network refurbishment programme proceeded,
additional staff were recruited to support longer
opening hours in certain branches and IT costs
increased. In France and Turkey, costs rose from the
recruitment of additional sales staff and higher
marketing expenditure. Costs in Global Banking and
Markets increased, reflecting higher performance-
related staff costs and the full year effect of the
investment in 2005 in the business, especially in
structured derivatives and Global Transaction
Banking, where significant revenue growth was
seen. These cost increases were partly offset by a
reduction in Commercial Banking expenses
following the sale of vehicle finance fleet
management activities in the UK.
In Hong Kong, the increase in operating
expenses of 14 per cent was mainly due to higher
staff and marketing costs. Additional staff recruited
to support longer opening hours in the branch
network and the expansion of Commercial
Banking, and an increase in revenue-driven
performance-related awards drove staff costs higher.
Marketing expenditure incurred on advertising and
promotional activities rose in support of credit card
and investment fund products in Personal Financial
Services and the launch of Commercial Banking’s
global campaign. The full year effect of the
enhancement in the second half of 2005 of Global
Banking and Markets’ business contributed further
to the cost growth.
The 27 per cent rise in operating expenses in the
Rest of Asia-Pacific region was primarily incurred
in supporting retail business expansion. Staff costs
rose from increased recruitment to support new
business initiatives and incentive payments grew in
response to improved revenues. Marketing expenses
rose as advertising and promotional activity aimed at
enlarging HSBC’s market share in cards, mortgages
and other unsecured lending grew, and Commercial
Banking marketing activity across several countries
increased. In Global Banking and Markets, cost
growth reflected higher revenue-driven performance-
related costs and increased expenditure in Global
Transaction Banking necessitated by business
volumes.
performance-linked pay contributed further to the
expense growth.
In North America, costs rose by 13 per cent in
In Latin America, operating expenses rose by
2006. In the US, the increase accompanied the
expansion of both the core banking network (by
25 branches) and the geographical presence of
Commercial Banking, and arose from incremental
costs incurred in support of revenue growth in the
consumer finance business. Marketing expenditure
also rose, in line with increased levels of activity in
the cards businesses in the US, continued promotion
of the online savings product and airport branding
initiatives. Cost growth in Canada followed higher
revenues. The first full year effect of the expansion
of various Global Banking and Markets businesses
that commenced last year, together with higher
Cost efficiency ratios
12 per cent. Staff costs grew as additional staff were
recruited to support business expansion and pay rises
were agreed with the unions. Marketing expenditure
was higher as a consequence of advertising
campaigns run by Personal Financial Services and
Commercial Banking. The continued expansion of
the branch network and ATM infrastructure in
Mexico, in conjunction with construction of the new
headquarters, also contributed to the overall cost
growth in the region. Costs rose in Global Banking
and Markets in line with higher transactional
volumes, increased headcount and union-agreed
pay rises.
HSBC ..............................................................................................................
Personal Financial Services ..........................................................................
Europe .............................................................................................................
Hong Kong ......................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .........................................................................................
North America .................................................................................................
Latin America ..................................................................................................
Commercial Banking ....................................................................................
Europe .............................................................................................................
Hong Kong ......................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .........................................................................................
North America .................................................................................................
Latin America ..................................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures
Year ended 31 December
2007
%
49.4
50.3
64.8
27.2
73.9
42.3
61.3
44.8
49.3
24.9
42.9
45.1
54.3
2006
%
51.3
49.7
59.2
32.2
71.1
42.3
65.6
43.7
46.7
26.1
42.5
44.9
55.9
2005
%
51.2
48.7
58.2
33.3
72.3
40.8
64.4
45.5
49.9
27.2
43.8
43.1
58.2
By geographical region
Europe ......................................................
Hong Kong ..............................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .................................
North America .........................................
Latin America ..........................................
Share of profit in associates and joint
2007
US$m
95
28
1,348
20
12
%
6.3
1.9
89.7
1.3
0.8
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$m
%
(72)
19
865
30
4
(8.4)
2.2
102.2
3.5
0.5
2005
US$m
120
23
453
48
–
%
18.6
3.6
70.3
7.5
–
ventures ...............................................
1,503
100.0
846
100.0
644
100.0
159
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures / Asset deployment
Bank of Communications ................................................................................
Ping An Insurance ...........................................................................................
Industrial Bank ................................................................................................
The Saudi British Bank ....................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Share of profit in:
– associates ..................................................................................................
– joint ventures ............................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...............................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
445
518
128
216
159
1,466
37
1,503
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
259
245
71
258
(10)
823
23
846
175
17
46
187
121
546
98
644
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures of
US$1.5 billion was 78 per cent higher than in 2006,
on both reported and underlying bases. The
commentary that follows is on an underlying basis.
In Europe, increased profit resulted from a
US$73 million adjustment to the embedded value of
HSBC Assurances, an associate in France, prior to
the acquisition of its remaining share capital,
following which it was accounted for as a subsidiary.
Profit from associates and joint ventures in the
Rest of Asia-Pacific region increased by 51 per
cent, mainly due to increased contributions from
HSBC’s strategic investments in mainland China.
Profit from Bank of Communications, Ping An
Insurance and Industrial Bank improved
significantly, driven largely by a thriving local
economy.
• HSBC’s share of profit from Ping An Insurance
rose by 101 per cent to US$518 million as
a result of robust growth, notably from life
insurance products and the realisation of
synergistic gains across Ping An Insurance’s
other business offerings.
• Profit from the Bank of Communications rose
by 64 per cent to US$445 million as a result of
improved performance across the associate’s
various product offerings. Increased income
from credit and treasury products and significant
growth in fee income contributed to the increase
in profits.
• HSBC’s share of profits from The Saudi
British Bank decreased by 22 per cent to
US$216 million. This was largely driven by the
effects of a significant correction to the local
stock market in the second half of 2006.
Income from associates and joint ventures was
US$846 million, an increase of 31 per cent
compared with 2005, and 7 per cent on an
underlying basis. The commentary that follows
is on an underlying basis.
Improved contributions from The Saudi British
Bank, Bank of Communications and Industrial Bank
were supplemented by a first full year contribution
from Ping An Insurance. These strategic investments
are of increasing significance to HSBC’s operations
in the Rest of Asia-Pacific region. The profits were
partly offset by a loss arising from an impairment
charge on a private equity investment of an associate
in Europe.
•
In August 2005, HSBC made an additional
investment to increase its stake in Ping An
Insurance to 19.9 per cent. The associate
reported record results for 2006, with steady
growth in the core insurance business
complemented by strong investment
performance following buoyant stock markets.
During 2006, Ping An Insurance group’s
nationwide back-office operation in Shanghai
became fully functional and the centralisation of
the life insurance underwriting and claims
business was completed.
• HSBC’s share of income from Bank of
Communications rose by 44 per cent, driven by
wider spreads and an improved product mix,
with increased corporate and consumer lending.
Fee income also rose as significant progress was
made in expanding its investment banking
operations.
In 2006, effective risk management and cost
control drove operating efficiency with an
improvement in the cost efficiency ratio, despite
a period of business expansion.
160
• During the second half of 2006, HSBC and The
Saudi British Bank jointly established HSBC
Saudi Arabia Limited, the first full-service
independent investment bank in Saudi Arabia
licensed under the local new Capital Market
law. HSBC, through a wholly owned subsidiary,
holds 60 per cent of the equity in the new
Asset deployment
Loans and advances to customers ..........................................................
Loans and advances to banks .................................................................
Trading assets .........................................................................................
Financial investments .............................................................................
Derivatives ..............................................................................................
Goodwill and intangible assets ...............................................................
Other .......................................................................................................
company and The Saudi British Bank, in which
HSBC has a 40 per cent shareholding, holds the
remaining 40 per cent.
The share of profits from The Saudi British
Bank grew by 21 per cent reflecting a strong
performance in all core businesses.
At 31 December
2007
US$m
981,548
237,366
445,968
283,000
187,854
39,689
178,841
%
41.7
10.1
18.9
12.0
8.0
1.7
7.6
2006
US$m
868,133
185,205
328,147
204,806
103,702
37,335
133,430
%
46.6
10.0
17.6
11.0
5.6
2.0
7.2
2,354,266
100.0
1,860,758
100.0
Loans and advances to customers include:
– reverse repos ...................................................................................
– settlement accounts ........................................................................
Loans and advances to banks include:
– reverse repos ...................................................................................
– settlement accounts ........................................................................
44,898
2,367
59,141
2,222
18,755
3,254
45,019
2,028
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
HSBC’s total assets at 31 December 2007 were
US$2,354 billion, an increase of US$494 billion or
27 per cent since 31 December 2006. Over 75 per
cent of the increase came from Global Banking and
Markets, with the largest contributions from trading
assets and derivatives following the strategic decision
to expand the collateralised lending, equities and
structured derivatives businesses in Europe.
Acquisitions added US$23 billion to total assets.
On an underlying basis, total assets grew by 21 per
cent.
The commentary that follows is on an underlying
basis.
At 31 December 2007, HSBC’s balance sheet
was highly liquid. The proportion of assets deployed
in loans and advances to customers declined to
42 per cent, while trading assets increased by
32 per cent to US$446 billion, representing
19 per cent of total assets. The increase in trading
assets is discussed below.
Customer advances rose by 9 per cent, due to
strong growth in corporate and commercial lending.
The largest contribution came from Europe with
strong growth in the UK and France.
Growth in residential mortgage lending was
subdued, reflecting the decision to slow lending in
the US in the light of a deterioration in credit
conditions in the personal sector.
Trading assets, financial investments and
derivatives
Trading assets principally consist of debt and equity
instruments acquired for the purpose of market
making or to benefit from short-term price
movements. Securities classified as held for trading
are carried in the balance sheet at fair value, with
movements in fair value recognised in the income
statement.
Trading assets of US$446 billion at
31 December 2007 were 32 per cent higher than at
31 December 2006. This increase was mainly due to
the growth of the collateralised lending business in
Europe. Holdings in debt securities rose as a result of
higher trading activity, growth in the structured notes
business and increased holdings of shorter maturity
assets in the UK. The increase in equity securities
resulted from an expansion in the equity swaps
business in London, particularly with Asian products,
and the growth in trading activity and structured
derivatives transactions in France.
Financial investments include debt and equity
instruments that are classified as available for sale or,
161
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
FUM / Assets held in custody and under administration / Economic profit
to a small extent, held to maturity. The available for
sale investments essentially represent a core element
of the Group’s liquidity and may be disposed of
either to manage that liquidity or in response to
investment opportunities arising from favourable
movements in economic indicators, such as interest
rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. They
are carried at fair value with unrealised gains and
losses from movements thereon reported in equity
until disposal. On disposal the accumulated
unrealised gain or loss is recognised through the
income statement and reported as ‘Gains less losses
from financial investments’.
Financial investments were 29 per cent higher
than reported at 31 December 2006, excluding the
effect of acquisitions, chiefly HSBC Assurances.
This was mainly due to the decision to consolidate
Cullinan Finance Ltd (‘Cullinan’) and Asscher
Finance Ltd (‘Asscher’), two structured investment
vehicles managed by HSBC. The continued growth
of HSBC’s operations in emerging markets also led
to increased holdings of debt securities as surplus
funds were invested and more assets were needed to
meet regulatory requirements. Net unrealised gains in
the valuation of equities amounted to US$4.2 billion.
Derivatives are financial instruments that derive
their value from the price of an underlying item.
HSBC transacts derivatives for three primary
purposes: to create risk management solutions for
clients, for proprietary trading purposes, and to
manage and hedge HSBC’s own risks.
Derivative assets rose by 73 per cent, due to
increases in interest rate swap balances, primarily
in the UK and France. Credit derivative assets
increased, particularly in the US in the first half of
the year, followed by a significant slowdown in
client trading in the second half of the year due to
the deterioration in credit markets. Foreign exchange
derivative balances increased, driven by heightened
volatility in major currencies, particularly the
US dollar.
Funds under management
Funds under management
At 1 January ...............................
Net new money ..........................
Value change .............................
Exchange and other ...................
At 31 December .........................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
695
36
53
60
844
561
44
57
33
695
162
Funds under management by
business
HSBC Global Asset
Management ..........................
Private Banking .........................
Affiliates ....................................
Other ...........................................
Year ended 31 December
2006
US$bn
2007
US$bn
380
275
3
186
844
328
232
2
133
695
Funds under management at 31 December 2007 were
US$844 billion, an increase of US$149 billion, or
21 per cent, compared with 31 December 2006. Both
HSBC Global Asset Management and Private
Banking delivered good investment performance and
continued to attract new funds with net new money
of US$36 billion.
HSBC Global Asset Management funds reached
US$380 billion, a rise of 16 per cent compared with
2006. This was attributable to US$12 billion of net
new money, strong investment performance and
favourable foreign exchange movements. Emerging
markets contributed significantly to overall growth,
with funds reaching US$93 billion, placing HSBC
Global Asset Management as one of the world’s
largest emerging market asset managers.
Private Banking’s funds increased by 19 per cent
to US$275 billion, driven by client acquisition, partly
due to greater brand awareness and an enhanced
product range, strong investment performance and
foreign exchange movements.
Client assets, which provide an indicator of
overall Private Banking volumes and include funds
under management, grew by 26 per cent, reaching
US$421 billion.
Other funds under management, of which the
main element is a corporate trust business in Asia,
increased by 40 per cent to US$186 billion, driven
by increases in the property trust business.
Assets held in custody and under
administration
At 31 December 2007, assets held by HSBC as
custodian amounted to US$6,094 billion, 33 per
cent higher than the US$4,572 billion held at
31 December 2006. At constant exchange rates,
growth was 30 per cent.
Complementing this was HSBC’s assets under
administration business. At 31 December 2007, the
value of assets held under administration by the
Group amounted to US$1,422 billion, 24 per cent
higher than the US$1,150 billion held at
31 December 2006. At constant exchange rates,
growth was 19 per cent.
Economic profit
HSBC’s internal performance measures include
economic profit, a calculation which compares the
return on financial capital invested in HSBC by its
shareholders with the cost of that capital. HSBC
prices its cost of capital internally and the difference
between that cost and profit attributable to ordinary
shareholders of the parent company, represents the
amount of economic profit generated. Economic
profit is used by management as a means of deciding
where to allocate resources so that they will be most
productive.
In order to concentrate on external factors rather
than measurement bases, HSBC emphasises the trend
in economic profit within business units rather than
absolute amounts. In light of the current levels of
world interest rates, and taking into account its
geographical and customer group diversification,
Average total shareholders’ equity .........................................................
Adjusted by:
Goodwill previously amortised or written off ...................................
Property revaluation reserves .............................................................
Reserves representing unrealised (gains)/losses on
effective cash flow hedges .............................................................
Reserves representing unrealised gains on
available-for-sale securities ...........................................................
Preference shares ................................................................................
Average invested capital2 .......................................................................
Return on invested capital3 .....................................................................
Benchmark cost of capital ......................................................................
Economic profit/spread ..........................................................................
HSBC believes that its true cost of capital on a
consolidated basis remains 10 per cent. HSBC plans
to continue using this rate until the end of the current
five-year strategic plan in 2008 in order to ensure
consistency and comparability.
Economic profit increased by US$1.4 billion, or
27 per cent compared with 2006. This increase
compared favourably with the decrease recorded in
2006. Growth in Asia was partially offset by loan
impairment charges, mainly in the US business. This
led to a geographical realignment of profitability
which had a positive effect on economic profit as,
in general, Asia has lower tax rates than the US.
Economic profit was also affected by significant fair
value movements on HSBC’s own debt as a result of
widening credit spreads and related derivatives. This
resulted in a higher return on average invested capital
and, in consequence, economic spread, which
increased by 0.4 percentage points compared
with 2006.
Year ended 31 December
2007
US$m
120,346
%1
2006
US$m
100,860
%1
8,172
(898)
425
(1,918)
(1,405)
124,722
19,043
(12,472)
6,571
15.3
(10.0)
5.3
8,172
(1,062)
(126)
(1,156)
(1,405)
105,283
15,699
(10,528)
5,171
14.9
(10.0)
4.9
1 Expressed as a percentage of average invested capital.
2 Average invested capital is measured as average total shareholders’ equity after:
– adding back the average balance of goodwill impaired or amortised pre-transition to IFRSs or subsequently written-off, directly to
reserves;
– deducting the average balance of HSBC’s revaluation surplus relating to property held for own use. This reserve was generated when
determining the deemed carrying cost of such properties on transition to IFRSs and will run down over time as the properties are
sold;
– deducting average preference shares issued by HSBC Holdings, and;
– deducting average reserves for unrealised gains/(losses) on effective cash flow hedges and available-for-sale securities.
3 Return on invested capital is based on the profit attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company.
163
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Average balance sheet
Other financial information
Average balance sheet and net interest
income
Average balances and related interest are shown for
the domestic operations of HSBC’s principal
commercial banks by geographic region. ‘Other
operations’ comprise the operations of the principal
commercial banking and consumer finance entities
outside their domestic markets and all other banking
operations, including investment banking balances
and transactions.
Average balances are based on daily averages
for the principal areas of HSBC’s banking activities
with monthly or less frequent averages used
elsewhere.
Assets
Balances and transactions with fellow
subsidiaries are reported gross in the principal
commercial banking and consumer finance entities
within ‘Other interest-earning assets’ and ‘Other
interest-bearing liabilities’ as appropriate and the
elimination entries are included within ‘Other
operations’ in those two categories.
Net interest margin numbers are calculated
by dividing net interest income as reported in the
income statement by the average interest-earning
assets from which interest income is reported
within the ‘Net interest income’ line of the income
statement. Interest income and interest expense
arising from trading assets and liabilities and the
funding thereof is included within ‘Net trading
income’ in the income statement.
Average
balance
2007
Interest
income Yield
US$m US$m %
Year ended 31 December
2006
Interest
income Yield
US$m
Average
balance
US$m
Average
balance
US$m
%
2005
Interest
income Yield
%
US$m
Summary
Total interest-earning assets (itemised
below) ...................................................... 1,296,701
374,973
14,899
(15,309)
440,686
Trading assets1 .............................................
Financial assets designated at fair value2 ....
Impairment provisions .................................
Non-interest-earning assets .........................
92,359 7.12 1,113,404
17,562 4.68
288,605
813 5.46
7,681
(11,864)
291,741
75,879 6.82
12,445 4.31
290 3.78
60,094 6.01
7,232 2.47
405 2.66
999,421
292,404
15,247
(12,469)
207,337
Total assets and interest income .................. 2,111,950
110,734 5.24 1,689,567
88,614 5.24 1,501,940
67,731 4.51
Short-term funds and loans and advances
to banks
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
Hang Seng Bank .............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
49,910
2,592 5.19
33,856
1,536 4.54
21,875
774 3.54
5,295
31,591
13,054
229 4.32
1,294 4.10
4,956
20,197
190 3.83
690 3.42
3,606
16,829
113 3.13
387 2.30
609 4.67
10,360
483 4.66
8,061
288 3.57
50,210
2,352 4.68
38,802
1,645 4.24
36,904
1,058 2.87
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East .
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Bank Canada ........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
19,286
2,861
6,328
9,393
3,810
3,555
5,790
897
304
810 4.20
103 3.60
324 5.12
477 5.08
174 4.57
239 6.72
645 11.14
33 3.68
16 5.26
13,388
2,492
4,279
8,422
3,167
3,395
4,129
130
196
520 3.88
87 3.49
208 4.86
465 5.52
138 4.36
227 6.69
572 13.85
9 6.92
8 4.08
11,667
1,767
3,262
3,579
2,115
2,994
3,305
69
264
351 3.01
49 2.77
111 3.40
151 4.22
62 2.93
228 7.62
565 17.10
3 4.35
7 2.65
Other operations ..........................................
19,087
898 4.70
16,686
618 3.70
14,954
453 3.03
221,371
10,795 4.88
164,455
7,396 4.50
131,251
4,600 3.50
For footnotes, see page 173.
164
Assets (continued)
Average
balance
US$m
2007
Interest
income Yield
US$m %
Year ended 31 December
2006
Interest
income Yield
US$m
Average
balance
US$m
Average
balance
US$m
%
2005
Interest
income Yield
%
US$m
Loans and advances to customers
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
HSBC Finance .................
Hang Seng Bank ..............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
237,231
18,078 7.62
226,528
14,166 6.25
203,568
12,223 6.00
9,805
68,027
5,492
507 5.17
3,219 4.73
611 11.13
7,134
52,990
5,932
338 4.74
2,463 4.65
671 11.31
5,795
41,977
9,951
211 3.64
1,710 4.07
1,086 10.91
37,827
2,120 5.60
34,416
1,952 5.67
32,893
1,323 4.02
48,134
2,901 6.03
47,292
2,843 6.01
43,971
2,061 4.69
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
59,286
7,467
15,125
4,321 7.29
507 6.79
1,200 7.93
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Finance .................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
90,091
153,658
43,570
6,585 7.31
18,086 11.77
2,598 5.96
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
16,469
13,569
8,113
1,667
2,187 13.28
3,895 28.71
778 9.59
241 14.46
52,159
6,292
12,757
88,563
147,336
35,055
13,193
9,461
1,189
838
3,449 6.61
430 6.83
957 7.50
46,652
5,380
10,038
2,659 5.70
325 6.04
635 6.33
6,141 6.93
17,061 11.58
2,037 5.81
86,800
118,215
28,491
5,594 6.44
13,307 11.26
1,439 5.05
1,532 11.61
3,244 34.29
92 7.74
107 12.77
9,983
7,447
990
914
1,210 12.12
2,647 35.54
67 6.77
122 13.35
Other operations ..........................................
21,318
1,790 8.40
19,795
1,528 7.72
26,213
1,285 4.90
836,849
69,624 8.32
760,930
59,011 7.76
679,278
47,904 7.05
Financial investments
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
Hang Seng Bank ..............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Finance .................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
45,885
2,431 5.30
42,726
1,977 4.63
35,787
1,297 3.62
10,372
10,357
511 4.93
511 4.93
8,729
2,545
391 4.48
95 3.73
8,725
4,482
342 3.92
143 3.19
30,791
1,550 5.03
27,288
1,224 4.49
23,445
815 3.48
20,717
1,017 4.91
20,362
911 4.47
29,508
924 3.13
23,739
1,515
3,654
23,373
4,072
6,068
3,327
5,596
709
563
1,065 4.49
56 3.70
174 4.76
1,189 5.09
229 5.62
258 4.25
319 9.59
672 12.01
58 8.18
68 12.08
17,179
954
1,387
22,214
3,724
4,351
4,049
3,862
429
311
737 4.29
36 3.77
72 5.19
1,109 4.99
200 5.37
174 4.00
427 10.55
501 12.97
21 4.90
38 12.22
15,100
1,182
1,311
19,262
3,945
3,951
4,995
2,328
92
218
592 3.92
41 3.47
44 3.36
864 4.49
221 5.60
116 2.94
583 11.67
324 13.92
5 5.43
23 10.55
Other operations ..........................................
27,252
1,407 5.16
24,742
1,191 4.81
17,677
876 4.96
217,990
11,515 5.28
184,852
9,104 4.93
172,008
7,210 4.19
For footnotes, see page 173.
165
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Average balance sheet
Assets (continued)
Average
balance
US$m
2007
Interest
income Yield
US$m %
Year ended 31 December
2006
Interest
income Yield
US$m
Average
balance
US$m
Average
balance
US$m
%
2005
Interest
income Yield
%
US$m
Other interest-earning assets
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
Hang Seng Bank .............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
11,170
652 5.84
9,938
652 6.56
14,748
543 3.68
16,360
12,158
882 5.39
419 3.45
14,558
6,434
732 5.03
173 2.69
11,831
9,811
416 3.52
442 4.51
832
42 5.05
538
28 5.20
81
3 3.70
27,057
1,237 4.57
19,246
909 4.72
18,310
443 2.42
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East .
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Finance ................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
11,137
231
758
3,731
1,724
960
–
840
1,351
39
588 5.28
12 5.19
52 6.86
231 6.19
89 5.16
31 3.23
–
–
75 8.93
40 2.96
1 2.56
6,938
178
380
1,867
767
1,006
–
1,004
–
23
449 6.47
10 5.62
32 8.42
82 4.39
43 5.61
32 3.18
–
–
190 18.92
–
–
3 13.04
4,836
283
371
1,444
2,063
641
1,186
558
116
43
200 4.14
8 2.83
18 4.85
43 2.98
67 3.25
18 2.81
16 1.35
162 29.03
4 3.45
2 4.65
Other operations ..........................................
(67,857)
(3,926)
(59,710)
(2,967)
(49,438)
(2,005)
20,491
425 2.07
3,167
368 11.62
16,884
380 2.25
Total interest-earning assets
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
HSBC Finance ................
Hang Seng Bank .............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East .
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Finance ................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
344,196
23,753 6.90
313,048
18,331 5.86
275,978
14,837 5.38
41,832
122,133
5,492
2,129 5.09
5,443 4.46
611 11.13
35,377
82,166
5,932
1,651 4.67
3,421 4.16
671 11.31
29,957
73,099
9,951
1,082 3.61
2,682 3.67
1,086 10.91
82,504
4,321 5.24
72,602
3,687 5.08
64,480
2,429 3.77
146,118
7,507 5.14
125,702
6,308 5.02
128,693
4,486 3.49
113,448
12,074
25,865
126,588
159,454
54,408
23,351
25,795
11,070
2,573
6,784 5.98
678 5.62
1,750 6.77
8,482 6.70
18,404 11.54
3,061 5.63
2,745 11.76
5,287 20.50
909 8.21
326 12.67
89,664
9,916
18,803
121,066
151,827
43,579
20,637
18,456
1,748
1,368
5,155 5.75
563 5.68
1,269 6.75
78,255
8,612
14,982
3,802 4.86
423 4.91
808 5.39
7,797 6.44
17,304 11.40
2,381 5.46
111,085
124,223
35,198
6,652 5.99
13,595 10.94
1,635 4.65
2,186 10.59
4,507 24.42
122 6.98
156 11.40
19,158
13,638
1,267
1,439
2,037 10.63
3,698 27.12
79 6.24
154 10.70
Other operations ..........................................
(200)
169
1,513
370
9,406
609
1,296,701
92,359 7.12 1,113,404
75,879 6.82
999,421
60,094 6.01
For footnotes, see page 173.
166
Total equity and liabilities
Summary
Total interest-bearing liabilities (itemised
Average
balance
US$m
2007
Interest
expense Cost
US$m %
Year ended 31 December
2006
Interest
expense Cost
Average
balance
US$m
US$m
%
Average
balance
US$m
2005
Interest
expense Cost
%
US$m
below) ...................................................... 1,279,460
250,572
54,564 4.26 1,067,646
224,050
12,186 4.86
41,393 3.88
9,842 4.39
920,095
211,059
28,760 3.13
5,024 2.38
Trading liabilities.........................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value
(excluding own debt issued) ..................
Non-interest-bearing current accounts .......
Total equity and other non-interest-bearing
liabilities .................................................
20,827
83,958
477,133
12,537
71,744
313,590
9,787
65,509
295,490
Total equity and liabilities .......................... 2,111,950
66,750 3.16 1,689,567
51,235 3.03 1,501,940
33,784 2.25
Deposits by banks4
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
Hang Seng Bank ..............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
44,787
2,148 4.80
32,825
1,311 3.99
32,673
1,037 3.17
690
30,816
22 3.19
1,358 4.41
1,030
23,171
33 3.20
886 3.82
886
17,935
20 2.26
582 3.25
2,993
123 4.11
2,031
84 4.14
1,876
61 3.25
3,634
150 4.13
2,745
125 4.55
3,430
116 3.38
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Bank Canada ........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
Other operations ..........................................
10,247
375
672
6,933
1,681
983
1,549
1,137
117
4,495
445 4.34
12 3.20
32 4.76
414 5.97
93 5.53
63 6.41
106 6.84
66 5.80
9 7.69
291 6.47
6,276
280
453
3,695
1,520
781
1,033
349
72
5,304
246 3.92
9 3.21
23 5.08
208 5.63
68 4.47
50 6.40
101 9.78
17 4.87
5 6.94
4,973
238
888
4,251
926
1,051
1,355
218
111
168 3.38
5 2.10
27 3.04
202 4.75
34 3.67
70 6.66
125 9.23
7 3.21
8 7.21
334 6.30
3,744
204 5.45
111,109
5,332 4.80
81,565
3,500 4.29
74,555
2,666 3.58
Financial liabilities designated at fair
value – own debt issued6
Europe
HSBC Holdings ...............
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC France ..................
15,142
9,907
143
822 5.43
525 5.30
11 7.69
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ..............
126
6 4.76
15,132
7,888
745 4.92
373 4.73
13,928
5,919
496 3.56
327 5.52
North America HSBC Bank USA ........... .
HSBC Finance .................
1,620
31,889
125 7.72
2,079 6.52
1,892
29,917
116 6.13
1,877 6.27
1,469
28,146
96 6.54
1,098 3.90
Other operations ..........................................
–
–
–
461
49 10.63
288
20 6.94
58,827
3,568 6.07
55,290
3,160 5.72
49,750
2,037 4.09
For footnotes, see page 173.
167
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Average balance sheet
Total equity and liabilities (continued)
Average
balance
US$m
2007
Interest
expense Cost
US$m %
Year ended 31 December
2006
Interest
expense Cost
Average
balance
US$m
US$m
%
Average
balance
US$m
2005
Interest
expense Cost
%
US$m
Customer accounts5
Europe
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
270,965
10,576 3.90
221,369
7,031 3.18
186,996
5,359 2.87
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
30,955
31,845
1,485 4.80
1,226 3.85
25,346
23,579
1,069 4.22
752 3.19
19,908
24,538
622 3.12
611 2.49
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ..............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Bank Canada ........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
61,227
1,900 3.10
54,267
1,712 3.15
51,460
874 1.70
125,478
3,499 2.79
104,441
2,934 2.81
95,496
1,322 1.38
76,052
8,823
15,685
78,138
30,060
14,230
19,581
7,604
1,892
2,645 3.48
260 2.95
578 3.69
3,051 3.90
1,090 3.63
548 3.85
2,163 11.05
314 4.13
85 4.49
56,760
7,260
11,713
71,031
25,277
13,625
14,887
998
983
1,903 3.35
212 2.92
411 3.51
2,490 3.51
804 3.18
471 3.46
2,056 13.81
34 3.41
41 4.17
48,997
6,123
8,696
60,795
21,635
8,272
10,790
736
903
1,293 2.64
157 2.56
207 2.38
1,385 2.28
475 2.20
188 2.27
1,859 17.23
17 2.31
28 3.10
Other operations ..........................................
55,351
2,297 4.15
49,846
1,811 3.63
44,080
1,256 2.85
827,886
31,717 3.83
681,382
23,731 3.48
589,425 15,653 2.66
Debt securities in issue
Europe
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC France ..................
HSBC Finance .................
64,168
28,757
240
3,753 5.85
1,207 4.20
18 7.50
45,870
19,818
548
2,047 4.46
633 3.19
32 5.84
28,620
14,271
3,330
1,817 6.35
314 2.20
77 2.31
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ..............
1,734
80 4.61
1,622
64 3.95
1,523
53 3.48
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
8,979
318
2,086
559 6.23
13 4.09
119 5.70
7,990
371
–
438 5.48
13 3.50
–
–
6,523
572
–
315 4.83
16 2.80
–
–
North America HSBC Bank USA ............
HSBC Finance .................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
25,724
115,520
14,771
1,232 4.79
5,311 4.60
640 4.33
28,832
112,353
10,616
1,407 4.88
5,047 4.49
460 4.33
25,537
75,913
7,963
1,073 4.20
3,399 4.48
268 3.37
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
1,147
1,417
607
12
110 9.59
115 8.12
45 7.41
–
–
249
700
35
–
23 9.24
70 10.00
2 5.71
–
–
4,585
401
–
7
285 6.22
67 16.71
–
–
1 14.29
Other operations ..........................................
6,446
(13)
(0.20)
3,070
108 3.52
6,834
90 1.32
271,926
13,189 4.85
232,074
10,344 4.46 176,079
7,775 4.42
For footnotes, see page 173.
168
Average
balance
US$m
2007
Interest
expense Cost
US$m %
Year ended 31 December
2006
Interest
expense Cost
Average
balance
US$m
US$m
%
Average
balance
US$m
2005
Interest
expense Cost
%
US$m
Other interest-bearing liabilities
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
HSBC Finance .................
Hang Seng Bank ..............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
22,035
1,302 5.91
23,196
1,026 4.42
23,924
547 2.29
3,427
27,830
4,557
163 4.76
979 3.52
227 4.98
3,545
13,476
4,211
155 4.37
488 3.62
219 5.20
4,247
14,154
5,299
130 3.06
220 1.55
361 6.81
2,278
114 5.00
1,378
64 4.64
1,228
36 2.93
9,866
535 5.42
8,140
365 4.48
6,981
221 3.17
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
North America HSBC Bank USA ........... .
HSBC Finance .................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
HSBC Markets Inc ..........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
12,631
232
1,168
13,602
1,941
1,151
8,889
207
1,103
574
95
580 4.59
6 2.59
81 6.93
587 4.32
113 5.82
27 2.35
255 2.87
16 7.73
182 16.50
9 1.57
4 4.21
13,425
235
1,046
11,966
542
1,134
2,883
135
817
–
79
629 4.69
9 3.83
63 6.02
1,211 10.12
18 3.32
22 1.94
88 3.05
8 5.93
105 12.85
–
10 12.66
–
13,725
137
767
13,287
–
856
4,718
1,258
2,264
69
35
460 3.35
4 2.92
23 3.00
–
1,332 10.02
–
12 1.40
121 2.56
30 2.38
86 3.80
3 4.35
4 11.43
Other operations ..........................................
(101,874)
(4,422)
(68,873)
(3,822)
(62,662)
(2,961)
9,712
758 7.80
17,335
658 3.80
30,287
629 2.08
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .....................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ........
HSBC France ..................
HSBC Finance .................
Hang Seng Bank ..............
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
411,862
18,304 4.44
331,148
11,788 3.56
278,131
9,087 3.27
35,072
119,391
4,797
1,670 4.76
4,781 4.00
245 5.11
29,921
80,044
4,759
1,257 4.20
2,759 3.45
251 5.27
25,041
70,898
8,629
772 3.08
1,727 2.44
438 5.08
68,358
2,223 3.25
59,298
1,924 3.24
56,087
1,024 1.83
138,978
4,184 3.01
115,326
3,424 2.97 105,907
1,659 1.57
Rest of
The Hongkong and
Asia-Pacific
Shanghai Banking
Corporation .................
HSBC Bank Malaysia .....
HSBC Bank Middle East
North America HSBC Bank USA ........... .
HSBC Finance .................
HSBC Bank Canada ........
HSBC Markets Inc ..........
Latin America HSBC Mexico .................
Brazilian operations3 .......
HSBC Bank Panama .......
HSBC Bank Argentina ....
107,909
9,748
19,611
126,017
149,350
47,663
8,889
16,567
23,650
9,922
2,116
4,229 3.92
291 2.99
810 4.13
5,409 4.29
7,503 5.02
1,850 3.88
255 2.87
737 4.45
2,566 10.85
434 4.37
98 4.63
84,451
8,146
13,212
117,416
142,812
38,547
2,883
14,790
17,437
1,383
1,134
3,216 3.81
243 2.98
497 3.76
74,218
7,070
10,351
5,432 4.63 105,339
6,942 4.86 104,059
31,380
1,354 3.51
4,718
88 3.05
552 3.73
2,332 13.37
53 3.83
56 4.94
15,166
14,810
1,023
1,056
2,236 3.01
182 2.57
257 2.48
4,088 3.88
4,497 4.32
789 2.51
121 2.56
573 3.78
2,137 14.43
27 2.64
41 3.88
Other operations ..........................................
(20,440)
(1,025)
4,939
(775)
6,212
(895)
1,279,460
54,564 4.26 1,067,646
41,393 3.88 920,095 28,760 3.13
For footnotes, see page 173.
169
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Average balance sheet / Analysis of changes in net interest income
Net interest margin
Year ended 31 December
Europe
HSBC Bank ...................................................................
HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France .................................................................
HSBC Finance ...............................................................
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ............................................................
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation .....
Rest of Asia-Pacific The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation .....
HSBC Bank Malaysia ...................................................
HSBC Bank Middle East ..............................................
North America
Latin America
HSBC Bank USA ..........................................................
HSBC Finance ...............................................................
HSBC Bank Canada ......................................................
HSBC Mexico ...............................................................
Brazilian operations3 .....................................................
HSBC Bank Panama .....................................................
HSBC Bank Argentina ..................................................
2007
%
1.58
1.10
0.54
6.66
2.54
2.27
2.25
3.21
3.63
2.43
6.84
2.23
8.60
10.55
4.29
8.86
2.91
2006
%
2.09
1.11
0.81
7.08
2.43
2.29
2.16
3.23
4.11
1.95
6.83
2.36
7.92
11.78
3.94
7.31
3.10
Distribution of average total assets
Year ended 31 December
2005
%
2.08
1.03
1.31
6.51
2.18
2.20
2.00
2.80
3.68
2.31
7.32
2.40
7.64
11.45
4.10
7.85
3.14
2005
%
30.1
2.2
9.9
0.7
4.8
12.7
6.5
0.6
1.1
10.7
9.3
2.6
1.6
1.4
0.1
0.1
5.6
2007
%
34.6
2.2
12.0
0.3
4.4
10.1
6.9
0.7
1.4
10.1
8.3
3.3
2.5
1.6
0.7
0.2
0.7
2006
%
30.6
2.3
10.0
0.5
4.3
10.7
6.0
0.6
1.3
11.3
10.0
2.4
1.7
1.5
0.2
0.1
6.5
100.0
100.0
100.0
Europe
HSBC Bank ...................................................................
HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France .................................................................
HSBC Finance ...............................................................
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ............................................................
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation .....
Rest of Asia-Pacific The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation .....
HSBC Bank Malaysia ...................................................
HSBC Bank Middle East ..............................................
North America
Latin America
HSBC Bank USA ..........................................................
HSBC Finance ...............................................................
HSBC Bank Canada ......................................................
HSBC Mexico ...............................................................
Brazilian operations1 .....................................................
HSBC Bank Panama .....................................................
HSBC Bank Argentina ..................................................
Other operations (including consolidation adjustments) ...................................
For footnotes, see page 173.
170
Analysis of changes in net interest income
The following table allocates changes in net interest income between volume and rate for 2007 compared with 2006,
and for 2006 compared with 2005.
Interest income
Short-term funds and loans and advances to banks
Increase/(decrease)
in 2007 compared
with 2006
Increase/(decrease) in
2006 compared with
2005
2007 Volume
US$m
US$m
Rate
US$m
2006
US$m
Volume
US$m
Rate
US$m
2005
US$m
Europe
Hong Kong
Rest of
Asia-Pacific
HSBC Bank .................................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France ..............................
Hang Seng Bank ..........................
The Hongkong and Shanghai
2,592
229
1,294
609
Banking Corporation ..............
2,352
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation ..............
HSBC Bank Malaysia .................
HSBC Bank Middle East ............
North America
HSBC Bank USA ........................
HSBC Bank Canada ....................
Latin America
HSBC Mexico .............................
Brazilian operations3 ...................
HSBC Bank Panama ...................
HSBC Bank Argentina ................
Other operations ........................................................
Loans and advances to customers
810
103
324
477
174
239
645
33
16
898
729
13
390
126
484
229
13
100
54
28
11
230
24
4
89
327
1,536
424
26
214
–
190
690
483
223
1,645
520
87
208
465
138
227
572
9
8
618
61
3
16
(42)
8
1
(157)
–
4
191
838
338
35
226
113
774
113
387
288
533
1,058
117
18
62
110
45
(32)
(134)
3
3
113
351
49
111
151
62
228
565
3
7
453
42
77
82
54
52
20
35
204
31
31
141
3
(2)
52
10,795
2,561
7,396
1,162
1,634
4,600
Europe
Hong Kong
Rest of
Asia-Pacific
North America
Latin America
HSBC Bank .................................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France ..............................
HSBC Finance .............................
Hang Seng Bank ..........................
The Hongkong and Shanghai
18,078
507
3,219
611
2,120
Banking Corporation ..............
2,901
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation ..............
HSBC Bank Malaysia ..................
HSBC Bank Middle East ............
HSBC Bank USA ........................
HSBC Finance .............................
HSBC Bank Canada ....................
HSBC Mexico .............................
Brazilian operations3 ...................
HSBC Bank Panama ...................
HSBC Bank Argentina ................
4,321
507
1,200
6,585
18,086
2,598
2,187
3,895
778
241
1,790
669
127
699
(50)
193
51
471
80
178
106
732
495
380
1,409
686
106
118
3,243
14,166
1,378
565
12,223
42
57
(10)
(25)
338
2,463
671
1,952
7
2,843
401
(3)
65
338
293
66
275
(758)
–
28
144
3,449
430
957
6,141
17,061
2,037
1,532
3,244
92
107
1,528
49
448
(438)
61
156
314
55
172
114
3,279
331
389
716
13
(10)
(314)
78
305
23
568
626
476
50
150
433
475
267
(67)
(119)
12
(5)
557
211
1,710
1,086
1,323
2,061
2,659
325
635
5,594
13,307
1,439
1,210
2,647
67
122
1,285
Other operations ........................................................
For footnotes, see page 173.
69,624
5,891
4,722
59,011
5,756
5,351
47,904
171
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Analysis of changes in net interest income
Interest income (continued)
Increase/(decrease)
in 2007 compared
with 2006
Increase/(decrease) in
2006 compared with
2005
2007 Volume
US$m
US$m
Rate
US$m
2006
US$m
Volume
US$m
Rate
US$m
2005
US$m
Financial investments
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .................................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France ..............................
Hang Seng Bank ..........................
The Hongkong and Shanghai
2,431
511
511
1,550
Banking Corporation ..............
1,017
Rest of
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Asia-Pacific
North America
Latin America
Banking Corporation ..............
HSBC Bank Malaysia .................
HSBC Bank Middle East ............
HSBC Bank USA ........................
HSBC Finance .............................
HSBC Bank Canada ....................
HSBC Mexico .............................
Brazilian operations3 ...................
HSBC Bank Panama ...................
HSBC Bank Argentina ................
1,065
56
174
1,189
229
258
319
672
58
68
Other operations ........................................................
1,407
146
74
291
157
16
281
21
118
58
19
69
(76)
225
37
31
121
11,515
1,634
Interest expense
Deposits by banks
Europe
HSBC Bank .................................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France ..............................
2,148
22
1,358
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ..........................
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation ..............
Rest of
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Asia-Pacific
Banking Corporation ..............
HSBC Bank Malaysia ..................
HSBC Bank Middle East ............
North America
HSBC Bank USA ........................
HSBC Bank Canada ....................
Latin America
HSBC Mexico .............................
Brazilian operations3 ...................
HSBC Bank Panama ...................
HSBC Bank Argentina ................
Other operations ........................................................
123
150
445
12
32
414
93
63
106
66
9
291
477
(11)
292
40
40
156
3
11
182
7
13
50
49
3
(51)
308
1,977
251
429
1,297
46
125
169
90
47
(1)
(16)
22
10
15
(32)
(54)
–
(1)
95
777
391
95
1,224
–
(62)
134
911
(286)
737
36
72
1,109
200
174
427
501
21
38
1,191
9,104
81
(8)
3
133
(12)
12
(110)
214
18
10
350
538
49
14
275
273
64
3
25
112
(9)
46
(46)
(37)
(2)
5
(35)
342
143
815
924
592
41
44
864
221
116
583
324
5
23
876
1,356
7,210
360
1,311
5
269
1,037
–
180
(1)
(15)
43
–
(2)
24
18
–
(45)
–
1
8
33
886
84
125
246
9
23
208
68
50
101
17
5
334
3
170
5
(23)
44
1
(13)
(26)
22
(18)
(30)
4
(3)
85
251
10
134
18
32
34
3
9
32
12
(2)
6
6
–
45
583
20
582
61
116
168
5
27
202
34
70
125
7
8
204
2,666
For footnotes, see page 173.
5,332
1,267
565
3,500
172
Interest expense (continued)
Customer accounts
Europe
Hong Kong
HSBC Bank .................................
HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse) ....................
HSBC France ..............................
Hang Seng Bank ..........................
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation ..............
3,499
Rest of
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Asia-Pacific
Banking Corporation ..............
HSBC Bank Malaysia .................
HSBC Bank Middle East ............
North America
HSBC Bank USA ........................
HSBC Bank Canada ....................
Latin America
HSBC Mexico .............................
Brazilian operations3 ...................
HSBC Bank Panama ...................
HSBC Bank Argentina ................
2,645
260
578
3,051
1,090
548
2,163
314
85
Other operations ........................................................
2,297
237
264
219
591
646
46
139
249
152
21
648
280
38
200
Increase/(decrease)
in 2007 compared
with 2006
Increase/(decrease) in
2006 compared with
2005
2007 Volume
US$m
US$m
Rate
US$m
2006
US$m
Volume
US$m
Rate
US$m
2005
US$m
10,576
1,577
1,968
7,031
987
1,485
1,226
1,900
179
210
(31)
1,069
752
1,712
170
(24)
48
685
277
165
790
5,359
622
611
874
(26)
2,934
123
1,489
1,322
96
2
28
312
134
56
(541)
–
6
286
1,903
212
411
2,490
804
471
2,056
34
41
1,811
205
29
72
233
80
122
706
6
2
164
405
26
132
872
249
161
(509)
11
11
391
1,293
157
207
1,385
475
188
1,859
17
28
1,256
Financial liabilities designated at fair value –
own debt issued
Debt securities in issue
31,717
5,098
2,888
23,731
2,446
5,632
15,653
3,568
196
212
3,160
227
896
2,037
1,095
122
(64)
(865)
197
19
Europe
HSBC Bank .................................
HSBC France ..............................
HSBC Finance .............................
3,753
1,207
18
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank ..........................
80
Rest of
The Hongkong and Shanghai
Asia-Pacific
North America
Latin America
Banking Corporation ..............
HSBC Bank Malaysia ..................
HSBC Bank Middle East ............
HSBC Bank USA ........................
HSBC Finance .............................
HSBC Bank Canada ....................
HSBC Mexico .............................
Brazilian operations3 ...................
HSBC Bank Panama ...................
HSBC Bank Argentina ................
Other operations ........................................................
559
13
119
1,232
5,311
640
110
115
45
–
(13)
816
285
(18)
4
54
(2)
119
(152)
142
180
83
72
43
–
890
289
4
12
67
2
–
(23)
122
–
4
(27)
–
–
2,047
633
32
64
438
13
–
1,407
5,047
460
23
70
2
–
119
(240)
108
3
71
(6)
–
138
1,633
89
(270)
50
–
(1)
(50)
13,189
1,777
1,068
10,344
2,475
1,817
314
77
53
315
16
–
1,073
3,399
268
285
67
–
1
90
7,775
8
52
3
–
196
15
103
8
(47)
2
–
68
94
Footnotes to ‘Average balance sheet and net interest income’ and ‘Analysis of changes in net
interest income’.
1 Interest income on trading assets is reported as ‘Net trading income’ in the consolidated income statement.
2 Interest income on financial assets designated at fair value is reported as ‘Net income from financial instruments designated at fair
value’ in the consolidated income statement.
3 Brazilian operations comprise HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.-Banco Múltiplo and subsidiaries, plus HSBC Serviços e Participações Limitada.
4 This table analyses interest-bearing bank deposits only. See page 180 for an analysis of all bank deposits.
5 This table analyses interest-bearing customer accounts only. See page 181 for an analysis of all customer accounts.
6 Interest expense on financial liabilities designated at fair value is reported as ‘Net income on financial liabilities designated at fair
value’ in the consolidated income statement other than interest on own debt.
173
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Share capital and reserves
Share capital and reserves
Authorised share capital
The authorised share capital of HSBC Holdings at
31 December 2007 was US$7,500,100,000 divided
into 15,000 million ordinary shares of US$0.50 each
and 10 million non-cumulative preference shares of
US$0.01 each; £401,500 divided into 10 million
non-cumulative preference shares of £0.01 each and
301,500 non-voting deferred shares of £1 each; and
€100,000 divided into 10 million non-cumulative
preference shares of €0.01 each.
The percentage of the total authorised share
capital of HSBC Holdings at 31 December 2007
represented by the numbers of ordinary shares of
US$0.50 each, non-cumulative preference shares
of £0.01 each, non-cumulative preference shares of
US$0.01 each, non-cumulative preference shares
of €0.01 each and non-voting deferred shares of
£1 each was approximately 99.9860, 0.0027,
0.0013, 0.0020 and 0.0081 per cent respectively.
Issued share capital
The issued share capital of HSBC Holdings at
31 December 2007 was US$5,915 million divided
into 11,829,052,317 ordinary shares of US$0.50
each; 1,450,000 non-cumulative preference shares of
US$0.01 each; and 301,500 non-voting deferred
shares of £1 each.
Rights and obligations attaching to shares
The rights and obligations attaching to each class of
share in the authorised share capital of HSBC
Holdings are set out in the Articles of Association of
HSBC Holdings. Set out below is a summary of the
rights and obligations attaching to each class of
shares with respect to voting, dividends, capital and,
in the case of the preference shares, redemption.
Ordinary shares
Subject to the Companies Act 2006 and the Articles
of Association of HSBC Holdings, in a general
meeting of HSBC Holdings, every holder of ordinary
shares who is present in person or by proxy shall on
a show of hands have one vote and every holder of
ordinary shares present in person or by proxy shall
on a poll have one vote for every share he or she
holds. Where any shareholder is, under the rules
governing the listing of securities on any stock
exchange on which all or any shares of HSBC
Holdings are for the time being listed or traded,
required to abstain from voting on any particular
resolution or restricted to voting only for or only
against any particular resolution, any votes cast by or
on behalf of such holder in contravention of such
requirement or restriction will not be counted.
Subject to the Companies Act 2006 and the
Articles of Association of HSBC Holdings, HSBC
Holdings may, by ordinary resolution, declare
dividends to be paid to the holders of ordinary
shares, however, no dividend shall exceed the
amount recommended by the Board. The Board may
pay interim dividends as appears to the Board to be
justified by the profits of HSBC Holdings available
for distribution. All dividends shall be apportioned
and paid proportionately to the percentage of the
nominal amount paid up on the shares during any
portion or portions of the period in respect of which
the dividend is paid, but if any share is issued on
terms providing that it shall rank for dividend as
from a particular date, it shall rank for dividend
accordingly. Subject to the Articles of Association of
HSBC Holdings, the Board may, with the prior
authority of an ordinary resolution of HSBC
Holdings and subject to such terms and conditions as
the Board may determine, offer to any holders of
ordinary shares the right to elect to receive ordinary
shares of the same or a different currency, credited
as fully paid, instead of cash in any currency in
respect of the whole (or some part, to be determined
by the Board) of any dividend specified by the
ordinary resolution. At the 2007 Annual General
Meeting shareholders gave authority to the Directors
to offer a scrip dividend alternative until the
conclusion of the Annual General Meeting in 2012.
Subject to the relevant insolvency laws and the
Articles of Association of HSBC Holdings, if HSBC
Holdings is wound up, the assets available for
distribution among the holders of ordinary shares
will be distributed among such holders in proportion
to the number of ordinary shares held by them
respectively, such distribution to be adjusted to take
account of any amount remaining unpaid on a
holder’s share. On a winding up, the liquidator may,
with the sanction of a special resolution of HSBC
Holdings and any other sanction required by law,
divide among the shareholders in specie the whole or
any part of the assets of HSBC Holdings and may,
for that purpose, value any assets and determine how
the division shall be carried out as between the
shareholders or different classes of shareholders.
Preference shares
The non-cumulative preference shares of £0.01 each,
the non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01
each (the ‘Dollar Preference Shares’) and the non-
cumulative preference shares of €0.01 each carry the
same rights and obligations under the Articles of
Association save in respect of the timing of and
174
payment of proceeds from the redemption of each
class of share, to the extent issued, and certain rights
and obligations that attach to each class of
preference share as determined by the Board prior to
allotment of the relevant preference shares. The
Dollar Preference Shares are the only class of the
preference shares which have been issued and
allotted to date.
Holders of the preference shares will only be
entitled to attend and vote at general meetings of
HSBC Holdings if any dividend payable on the
relevant preference shares in respect of such period
as the Board shall determine prior to allotment
thereof (which, in the case of the Dollar Preference
Shares in issue at 3 March 2008, is four consecutive
dividend payment dates) is not paid in full or in such
other circumstances, and upon and subject to such
terms, as the Board may determine prior to allotment
of the relevant preference shares. Whenever holders
of the relevant preference shares are entitled to vote
on a resolution at a general meeting, on a show of
hands every such holder who is present in person or
by proxy shall have one vote and on a poll every
such holder who is present in person or by proxy
shall have one vote per preference share held by him
or her or such number of votes per share as the
Board shall determine prior to allotment of such
share.
Subject to the Articles of Association, holders of
the relevant preference shares shall have the right to
a non-cumulative preferential dividend at such rate,
on such dates and on such other terms and conditions
as may be determined by the Board prior to
allotment thereof in priority to the payment of any
dividend to the holders of ordinary shares and any
other class of shares of HSBC Holdings in issue
(other than (i) the other preference shares in issue
and any other shares expressed to rank pari passu
therewith as regards income; and (ii) any shares
which by their terms rank in priority to the relevant
preference shares as regards income). Dividends on
the Dollar Preference Shares in issue at 3 March
2008 are paid quarterly at the sole and absolute
discretion of the Board of Directors. The Board of
Directors will not declare a dividend on the Dollar
Preference Shares if payment of the dividend would
cause HSBC Holdings not to meet the applicable
capital adequacy requirements of the FSA or the
profit of HSBC Holdings available for distribution as
dividends is not sufficient to enable HSBC Holdings
to pay in full both dividends on the relevant
preference shares and dividends on any other shares
that are scheduled to be paid on the same date and
that have an equal right to dividends. HSBC
Holdings may not declare or pay dividends on any
class of its shares ranking lower in the right to
dividends than the preference shares nor redeem nor
purchase in any manner any of its other shares
ranking equal with or lower than the preference
shares unless it has paid in full, or set aside an
amount to provide for payment in full, the dividends
on the preference shares for the then-current
dividend period.
The preference shares carry no rights to
participate in the profits or assets of HSBC Holdings
other than as set out in the Articles of Association,
subject to the Companies Act 1985, do not confer
any right to participate in any offer or invitation by
way of rights or otherwise to subscribe for additional
shares in HSBC Holdings, do no not confer any right
of conversion and do not confer any right to
participate in any issue or bonus shares or shares
issued by way of capitalisation of reserves.
Subject to the relevant insolvency laws and the
Articles of Association of HSBC Holdings, holders
of the relevant preference shares have the right in a
winding up of HSBC Holdings to receive out of the
assets of HSBC Holdings available for distribution
to its shareholders, in priority to any payment to the
holders of the ordinary shares and any other class of
shares of HSBC Holdings in issue (other than (i) the
other relevant preference shares and any other shares
expressed to rank pari passu therewith as regards
repayment of capital; and (ii) any shares which by
their terms rank in priority to the relevant preference
shares as regards repayment of capital), a sum equal
to any unpaid dividend on the relevant preference
shares which is payable as a dividend in accordance
with or pursuant to the Articles of Association and
the amount paid up or credited as paid up on the
relevant preference shares together with such
premium (if any) as may be determined by the
Board prior to allotment thereof.
HSBC Holdings may redeem the relevant
preference shares in accordance with the Articles of
Association and the terms on which the relevant
preference shares were issued and allotted. In the
case of the Dollar Preference Shares in issue at
3 March 2008, HSBC Holdings may redeem such
shares in whole at any time on or after 16 December
2010, with the consent of the FSA.
Non-voting deferred shares
The non-voting deferred shares are held by a
subsidiary undertaking of HSBC Holdings. Holders
of the non-voting deferred shares are not entitled to
receive dividends on these shares. In addition, on
winding up or other return of capital, holders are
entitled to receive the amount paid up on their shares
175
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Share capital and reserves / Short-term borrowings
after distribution to ordinary shareholders of
£10,000,000 in respect of each ordinary share held
by them. The holders of the non-voting deferred
shares are not entitled to receive notice of or to
attend (either personally or by proxy) any general
meeting of HSBC Holdings or to vote (either
personally or by proxy) on any resolution to be
proposed thereat.
To be registered, a transfer of shares must be
in relation to a share which is fully paid up and on
which the Company has no lien and to one class
of shares denominated in the same currency. The
transfer must be in favour of a single transferee or
no more than four joint transferees and it must be
duly stamped (if required). The transfer must be
delivered to the registered office of the Company
or to its Registrars accompanied by the certificate to
which it relates or such other evidence that proves
the title of the transferor.
If a shareholder or any person appearing to be
interested in the Company’s shares has been sent a
notice under section 793 of the Companies Act 2006
(which confers upon public companies the power to
require information from any person whom the
Company knows or has reasonable cause to believe
to be interested in the shares) and has failed in
relation to any shares (the ‘default shares’) to supply
the information requested within the period set out in
the notice, then the member is not entitled to be
present at or to vote the default shares at any general
meeting or to exercise any other right conferred by
being a shareholder. If the default shares represent at
least 0.25 per cent in nominal value of the issued
shares of that class any dividend shall be withheld by
the Company, without interest and no election for
the scrip dividend alternative may be made. No
transfer of any shares held by the member will be
registered, except in limited circumstances.
The percentage of the total issued share capital
of HSBC Holdings at 31 December 2007 represented
by the ordinary shares of US$0.50 each, non-
cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 each
and non-voting deferred shares of £1 each was
approximately 99.9895, 0.0002, and 0.0102 per
cent respectively.
The following events occurred during the year
in relation to the share capital of HSBC Holdings:
Scrip dividends
1. 11,899,858 ordinary shares were issued at par
in January 2007 to shareholders who elected to
receive new shares in lieu of the third interim
dividend for 2006. The market value per share
used to calculate shareholders’ entitlements to
new shares was US$18.7596, being the
US dollar equivalent of £9.65.
2. 121,070,708 ordinary shares were issued at par
in May 2007 to shareholders who elected to
receive new shares in lieu of the fourth interim
dividend for 2006. The market value per share
used to calculate shareholders’ entitlements to
new shares was US$17.4801, being the US
dollar equivalent of £8.898.
3. 38,617,708 ordinary shares were issued at par in
July 2007 to shareholders who elected to receive
new shares in lieu of the first interim dividend
for 2007. The market value per share used to
calculate shareholders’ entitlements to new
shares was US$18.4375, being the US dollar
equivalent of £9.352.
4. 51,950,381 ordinary shares were issued at par in
October 2007 to shareholders who elected to
receive new shares in lieu of the second interim
dividend for 2007. The market value per share
used to calculate shareholders’ entitlements to
new shares was US$17.5483, being the
US dollar equivalent of £8.874.
All-Employee share plans
5.
In connection with the exercise of options under
the HSBC Holdings savings-related share option
plans: 16,135,919 ordinary shares were issued at
prices ranging from £5.3496 to £7.6736;
1,180,575 ordinary shares were issued at prices
ranging from HK$103.4401 to HK$108.4483;
595,868 ordinary shares were issued at prices
ranging from US$13.329 to US$14.1621; and
38,928 ordinary shares were issued at €11.0062.
Options over 10,251,717 ordinary shares lapsed.
6. 2,682,894 ordinary shares were issued at
€10.9675 per share and 257,193 ordinary shares
were issued at €12.3385 per share in connection
with a Plan d’Epargne Entreprise for the benefit
of non-UK resident employees of HSBC France
and its subsidiaries.
7. Options over 30,105,239 ordinary shares were
granted at nil consideration on 25 April 2007 to
nearly 72,000 HSBC employees resident in
nearly 70 countries and territories under the
HSBC Holdings savings-related share option
plans.
Discretionary share incentive plans
8. 3,377,896 ordinary shares were issued at prices
ranging from £5.016 to £7.46 per share in
connection with the exercise of options under
the HSBC Holdings Executive Share Option
176
Scheme. Options over 420,667 ordinary shares
lapsed.
9. 8,351,649 ordinary shares were issued at prices
ranging from £6.91 to £8.712 per share in
connection with the exercise of options under
the HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan.
Options over 8,221,968 ordinary shares lapsed.
HSBC Finance
10. 685,005 ordinary shares were issued at prices
ranging from US$16.66 to US$19.19 per share
in connection with the vesting of Restricted
Stock Rights under HSBC Finance share plans
that have been converted into rights over HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares.
Authority to repurchase ordinary shares
11. At the Annual General Meeting in 2007,
shareholders renewed the authority for the
Company to make market repurchases of
ordinary shares. The authority is to make market
repurchases of up to 1,158,660,000 ordinary
shares. The Directors have not exercised this
authority. In accordance with the terms of a
waiver granted by the Hong Kong Stock
Exchange on 19 December 2005, HSBC
Holdings will comply with the applicable law
and regulation in the UK in relation to the
holding of any shares in treasury and with the
conditions of the waiver, in connection with any
shares it may hold in treasury.
Authority to allot shares
12. At the Annual General Meeting in 2007
shareholders renewed the general authority for
the Directors to allot new shares. The general
authority is to allot up to 2,317,320,000 ordinary
shares, 10,000,000 non-cumulative preference
shares of £0.01 each, 8,550,000 non-cumulative
preference shares of US$0.01 each and
10,000,000 non-cumulative preference shares
of €0.01 each. Within this, the Directors
have authority to allot up to a maximum of
579,330,000 ordinary shares wholly for cash
to persons other than existing shareholders.
Other than as described in paragraphs 1 to 6 and
8 to 10 above, the Directors did not allot any
shares during 2007.
Short-term borrowings
HSBC includes short-term borrowings within
customer accounts, deposits by banks and debt
securities in issue and does not show short-term
borrowings separately on the balance sheet. Short-
term borrowings are defined by the US Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘SEC’) as Federal funds
purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase, commercial paper and other short-term
borrowings. HSBC’s only significant short-term
borrowings are securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and certain debt securities in issue.
Additional information on these is provided in the
tables below.
Year ended 31 December
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Outstanding at 31 December ...........................................................................
Average amount outstanding during the year .................................................
Maximum quarter-end balance outstanding during the year ..........................
Weighted average interest rate during the year ...............................................
Weighted average interest rate at the year-end ...............................................
Short-term bonds
Outstanding at 31 December ...........................................................................
Average amount outstanding during the year .................................................
Maximum quarter-end balance outstanding during the year ..........................
Weighted average interest rate during the year ...............................................
Weighted average interest rate at the year-end ...............................................
2007
US$m
140,001
129,779
148,601
5.4%
4.8%
51,792
39,153
51,792
7.0%
6.5%
2006
US$m
97,139
102,715
109,689
4.3%
4.6%
37,906
37,729
38,907
5.1%
4.8%
2005
US$m
75,745
74,143
78,590
3.6%
4.0%
40,642
31,908
40,642
4.6%
3.7%
177
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Contractual obligations / Ratios / Loan maturities
Contractual obligations
The table below provides details of HSBC’s material contractual obligations as at 31 December 2007.
Long-term debt obligations ..........................................
Term deposits and certificates of deposit .....................
Capital (finance) lease obligations ...............................
Operating lease obligations ..........................................
Purchase obligations .....................................................
Short positions in debt securities and equity shares .....
Current tax liability .......................................................
Pension obligations .......................................................
Total
US$m
318,653
278,693
703
4,559
942
108,246
2,559
9,055
723,410
Payments due by period
Less than
1 year
US$m
1–5 years
US$m
More than
5 years
US$m
111,101
263,557
15
799
420
83,598
2,559
625
462,674
131,345
15,136
27
2,024
522
9,690
–
3,450
162,194
76,207
–
661
1,736
–
14,958
–
4,980
98,542
Ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges (and preference share dividends)
Year ended 31 December
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
Ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges
Ratios in accordance with IFRSs
– excluding interest on deposits ...............................................
– including interest on deposits ................................................
7.52
1.34
7.93
1.41
9.60
1.59
8.64
1.86
–
–
Ratios in accordance with UK GAAP
– excluding interest on deposits ...............................................
– including interest on deposits ................................................
–
–
–
–
–
–
8.07
1.81
7.41
1.80
Ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preference share dividends
Ratios in accordance with IFRSs:
– excluding interest on deposits ...............................................
– including interest on deposits ................................................
6.96
1.34
7.22
1.40
9.16
1.59
8.64
1.86
–
–
Ratios in accordance with UK GAAP
– excluding interest on deposits ...............................................
– including interest on deposits ................................................
–
–
–
–
–
–
8.07
1.81
7.41
1.80
For the purpose of calculating the ratios, earnings consist of income from continuing operations before taxation and minority interests,
plus fixed charges, and after deduction of the unremitted pre-tax income of associated undertakings. Fixed charges consist of total interest
expense, including or excluding interest on deposits, as appropriate, preference share dividends, as applicable, and the proportion of
rental expense deemed representative of the interest factor.
The above table contains ratios based on UK GAAP, HSBC’s previous primary GAAP, which is not comparable to financial information
based upon IFRSs, as explained in HSBC’s 2004 IFRSs Comparative Financial Information published on 5 July 2004.
178
Loan maturity and interest sensitivity analysis
At 31 December 2007, the geographical analysis of loan maturity and interest sensitivity by loan type on a
contractual repayment basis was as follows:
Maturity of 1 year or less
Loans and advances to banks .............................
Commercial loans to customers
Commercial, industrial and international
trade.............................................................
Real estate and other property related ............
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Hong Kong Government Home Ownership
Scheme ...........................................................
Residential mortgages and other personal loans .
Loans and advances to customers ......................
Maturity after 1 year but within 5 years
Loans and advances to banks .............................
Commercial loans to customers
Commercial, industrial and international
trade.............................................................
Real estate and other property related ............
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Hong Kong Government Home Ownership
Scheme ...........................................................
Residential mortgages and other personal loans .
Loans and advances to customers ......................
Interest rate sensitivity of loans and advances to
banks and commercial loans to customers:
Fixed interest rate ...........................................
Variable interest rate ......................................
Maturity after 5 years
Loans and advances to banks ..............................
Commercial loans to customers
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate and other property related ............
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Hong Kong Government Home Ownership
Scheme ...........................................................
Residential mortgages and other personal loans .
Loans and advances to customers ......................
Interest rate sensitivity of loans and advances to
banks and commercial loans to customers
Fixed interest rate ...........................................
Variable interest rate ......................................
Hong
Kong
US$m
Rest
of Asia-
Pacific
US$m
Europe
US$m
North
Latin
America
America
US$m
US$m
Total
US$m
93,786
63,474
39,534
15,906
9,981
222,681
84,293
21,048
57,054
1,423
33,379
197,197
–
37,382
234,579
328,365
14,259
6,434
1,395
68
2,097
24,253
438
14,499
39,190
29,713
5,554
4,004
1,080
6,176
46,527
–
14,632
61,159
5,293
10,541
20,342
91
8,723
44,990
–
50,872
95,862
102,664
100,693
111,768
9,589
1,442
2,068
465
2,977
16,541
–
10,556
27,097
37,078
143,147
45,019
84,863
3,127
53,352
329,508
438
127,941
457,887
680,568
10,397
263
236
634
80
11,610
22,765
14,809
3,035
342
11,637
52,588
–
42,576
95,164
105,561
13,470
49,515
62,985
3,045
9,832
456
263
2,191
5,650
5,738
1,160
415
2,969
6,370
7,412
1,690
95
2,242
15,787
15,932
17,809
1,384
9,007
26,178
26,441
209
15,841
16,050
–
9,506
25,438
25,674
2,662
13,506
16,168
–
64,799
82,608
83,242
3,539
14,904
18,443
3,376
962
858
242
1,376
6,814
–
6,644
13,458
13,538
41,206
38,753
7,199
1,357
20,415
108,930
1,384
132,532
242,846
254,456
1,967
4,927
6,894
21,847
98,693
120,540
351
–
91
26
2,614
3,082
1,098
964
27
172
1,148
3,409
–
12,772
16,181
16,272
992
2,508
3,500
2,274
4,608
220
62
1,315
8,479
–
114,891
123,370
123,396
912
7,593
8,505
576
615
2,713
455
421
4,780
–
4,580
9,360
11,974
509
6,885
7,394
17,685
22,480
4,719
1,224
15,373
61,481
2,120
240,361
303,962
307,044
12,469
52,094
64,563
13,301
12,090
1,127
534
10,820
37,872
–
88,591
126,463
126,814
10,055
28,168
38,223
436
4,203
632
1
1,669
6,941
2,120
19,527
28,588
28,588
1
6,940
6,941
179
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Deposits
Deposits
The following tables analyse the average amount of
bank deposits, customer deposits and certificates of
deposit (‘CDs’) and other money market instruments
(which are included within ‘Debt securities in issue’
in the balance sheet), together with the average
interest rates paid thereon for each of the past three
years. The geographical analysis of average deposits
is based on the location of the office in which the
deposits are recorded and excludes balances with
HSBC companies. The ‘Other’ category includes
securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Year ended 31 December
2007
Average
balance
Average
2006
Average
balance
US$m
Average
rate
Deposits by banks
Europe
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Hong Kong
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
North America
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Latin America
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Total
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
US$m
6,359
11,036
38,470
28,770
84,635
1,331
2,420
3,267
251
7,269
1,897
3,167
6,433
2,768
14,265
827
3,759
6,746
169
11,501
808
153
2,690
1,010
4,661
11,222
20,535
57,606
32,968
122,331
rate
%
–
3.8
4.7
4.8
–
4.3
4.5
0.4
–
2.4
5.1
4.8
–
4.8
6.0
7.1
–
5.9
6.5
8.0
–
3.8
4.9
5.0
%
–
3.7
4.0
3.5
–
4.6
4.3
3.3
–
2.4
4.8
4.5
–
5.3
5.4
5.6
–
6.3
5.5
9.4
–
4.5
4.5
3.9
9,814
8,368
27,447
23,396
69,025
1,031
2,428
2,016
362
5,837
1,618
1,960
3,645
2,157
9,380
767
3,033
3,543
699
8,042
702
96
1,732
683
3,213
13,932
15,885
38,383
27,297
95,497
2005
Average
balance
US$m
Average
rate
%
14,252
9,418
28,021
16,111
67,802
2,054
3,104
2,012
218
7,388
2,164
1,442
4,375
761
8,742
1,334
3,647
2,406
38
7,425
49
117
1,810
1,075
3,051
19,853
17,728
38,624
18,203
94,408
–
2.9
3.0
3.6
–
3.5
3.2
2.3
–
1.9
4.3
5.4
–
3.6
6.0
5.3
–
7.7
6.4
8.9
–
3.1
3.5
4.1
180
2007
Average
balance
Average
Customer accounts
Europe
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Savings ...................................................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Hong Kong
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Savings ...................................................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Savings ...................................................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
North America
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Savings ...................................................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Latin America
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Savings ...................................................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
Total
Demand and other – non-interest
bearing ................................................
Demand – interest bearing .....................
Savings ...................................................
Time ........................................................
Other .......................................................
CDs and other money market instruments
Europe ............................................................
Hong Kong ....................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .......................................
North America ...............................................
Latin America ................................................
US$m
34,585
210,692
62,002
69,476
14,741
391,496
14,214
107,053
63,649
26,712
1,164
212,792
16,438
41,089
57,950
11,538
1,835
128,850
15,175
15,389
79,529
17,655
3,234
130,982
10,530
5,662
24,861
12,443
1,212
54,708
90,942
379,885
287,991
137,824
22,186
918,828
66,164
941
7,230
23,735
1,526
99,596
rate
%
–
3.5
4.6
4.9
4.5
–
2.2
3.9
3.9
4.3
–
2.4
4.2
4.6
4.5
–
3.3
3.3
5.9
3.7
–
2.1
8.8
5.9
9.5
–
3.0
4.4
4.9
4.7
5.0
3.9
6.0
5.4
6.8
5.2
181
Year ended 31 December
2006
Average
balance
Average
rate
US$m
%
33,000
173,150
50,525
59,374
9,249
325,298
13,011
88,754
58,883
20,454
51
181,153
13,107
29,816
42,153
10,246
2,233
97,555
13,662
14,406
65,216
21,124
3,339
117,747
7,995
5,438
16,512
7,665
2,145
39,755
80,775
311,564
233,289
118,863
17,017
761,508
–
2.7
3.9
4.2
4.1
–
2.4
3.8
3.6
3.9
–
2.1
4.3
4.5
3.5
–
2.9
2.8
5.4
2.0
–
1.6
11.3
5.9
13.4
–
2.6
4.1
4.5
4.8
48,238
1,191
6,621
23,472
318
4.2
3.5
5.6
4.6
10.7
79,840
4.5
2005
Average
balance
US$m
Average
rate
%
28,501
146,484
46,248
48,201
10,967
280,401
13,365
91,723
50,281
14,054
15
169,438
11,825
27,721
31,584
10,484
1,895
83,509
13,627
11,723
52,458
21,759
2,549
102,116
–
2.4
3.3
3.9
2.7
–
0.9
2.4
2.7
6.7
–
1.7
3.3
3.5
3.9
–
1.9
1.6
3.6
4.5
5,583
6,341
10,980
2,529
1,429
26,862
–
1.2
15.2
5.6
17.5
72,901
283,992
191,551
97,027
16,855
662,326
27,778
1,599
7,467
19,566
4,657
61,067
–
1.8
3.3
3.7
4.4
5.8
3.1
6.2
3.1
6.4
5.0
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > CDs and other time deposits / Off-balance sheet arrangements and SPEs
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits
At 31 December 2007, the maturity analysis of CDs and other wholesale time deposits, by remaining maturity, was
as follows:
Europe
Certificates of deposit ..........................
Time deposits:
– banks ..................................................
– customers ...........................................
Hong Kong
Certificates of deposit ..........................
Time deposits:
– banks ..................................................
– customers ...........................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Certificates of deposit ..........................
Time deposits:
– banks ..................................................
– customers ...........................................
North America
Certificates of deposit ..........................
Time deposits:
– banks ..................................................
– customers ...........................................
Latin America
Certificates of deposit ..........................
Time deposits:
– banks ..................................................
– customers ...........................................
Total
Certificates of deposit ..........................
Time deposits:
– banks ..................................................
– customers ...........................................
3 months
or less
US$m
30,087
35,721
81,134
146,942
969
1,955
22,450
25,374
3,816
7,104
10,896
21,816
–
6,164
15,151
21,315
386
1,289
11,988
13,663
35,258
52,233
141,619
229,110
After
3 months
but within
6 months
After
6 months
but within
12 months
US$m
US$m
2,863
2,089
6,063
11,015
646
–
359
3,066
2,233
2,108
7,407
974
–
233
1,005
1,207
2,235
863
987
4,085
–
283
327
610
1,289
362
1,514
3,165
7,033
3,597
9,250
1,554
497
673
2,724
–
3
1,324
1,327
325
364
1,213
1,902
5,919
3,097
5,551
After
12 months
US$m
Total
US$m
–
36,016
4,097
3,554
7,651
1,373
37
909
2,319
221
111
1,763
2,095
–
3
1,857
1,860
610
355
246
1,211
2,204
4,603
8,329
44,140
92,859
173,015
3,962
1,992
23,951
29,905
7,826
8,575
14,319
30,720
–
6,453
18,659
25,112
2,610
2,370
14,961
19,941
50,414
63,530
164,749
278,693
19,880
14,567
15,136
The geographical analysis of deposits is based on the location of the office in which the deposits are recorded and excludes balances with
HSBC companies. The majority of certificates of deposit and time deposits are in amounts of US$100,000 and over or the equivalent in
other currencies.
182
Off-balance sheet arrangements and
special purpose entities
(Audited)
This section contains disclosures about off-balance
sheet arrangements and special purpose entities
(‘SPEs’) that have been included in HSBC’s
consolidated balance sheet.
Special purpose entities (including on and
off-balance sheet arrangements)
HSBC enters into certain transactions with
customers in the ordinary course of business which
involve the establishment of SPEs to facilitate
customer transactions.
HSBC structures that utilise SPEs are authorised
centrally upon establishment to ensure appropriate
purpose and governance. The activities of SPEs
administered by HSBC are closely monitored by
senior management. The use of SPEs is not a
significant part of HSBC’s activities and HSBC is
not reliant on the use of SPEs for any material part
of its business operations or profitability. HSBC’s
involvements with SPE transactions are described
below.
HSBC-sponsored vehicles
HSBC sponsors the formation of entities to
accomplish certain narrow and well-defined
objectives, such as securitisations of financial assets
or to effect a lease. HSBC consolidates these SPEs
when the substance of the relationship indicates that
HSBC controls the SPE. In assessing control, all
relevant factors need to be considered. Such factors
may have qualitative and quantitative aspects. For
example:
Qualitative factors. In substance:
•
the activities of the SPE are being conducted on
behalf of HSBC according to HSBC’s specific
business needs so that it obtains benefit from the
SPE’s operation. This might be evidenced, for
example, by HSBC providing a significant level
of support to the SPE; and
• HSBC has the decision-making powers to obtain
the majority of the benefits of the activities of
the SPE.
Quantitative factors – hereinafter referred to as
‘the majority of risks and rewards of ownership’. In
substance:
• HSBC has rights to obtain the majority of the
benefits of the SPE and therefore may be
exposed to risks incidental to the activities
of the SPE; and
183
• HSBC retains the majority of the residual or
ownership risks related to the SPE or its assets
in order to obtain benefits from its activities.
In a number of cases, these SPEs are accounted
for off-balance sheet under IFRSs where HSBC does
not have the majority of the risks and rewards of
ownership of the SPE. However in certain
circumstances, after careful consideration of the
facts, HSBC consolidates an SPE where, although it
does not obtain the majority of risks and rewards of
ownership, the qualitative features of HSBC’s
involvement indicate that, in substance, the activities
of the SPE are being conducted on behalf of HSBC.
HSBC reassesses the required consolidation
accounting tests whenever there is a change in the
substance of a relationship between HSBC and an
SPE, for example, when there is a change in HSBC’s
involvement or there is a change in the governing
rules, contractual arrangements or capital structure
of the SPE. The most significant categories of SPEs
are discussed in more detail below.
Structured investment vehicles
Structured investment vehicles (‘SIVs’) are SPEs
which are established to invest in diversified
portfolios of interest-earning assets, generally
comprising asset-backed debt securities and other
debt securities issued by financial institutions or
corporates. SIVs are typically funded through the
issue of CP, medium-term notes or other senior debt
(collectively referred to as ‘senior debt’), repo
financing, and subordinated income or mezzanine
notes (commonly referred to as ‘capital notes’).
The sponsor of the SIV would typically provide only
limited liquidity support to the senior debt investors
through committed liquidity facilities.
SIVs are structured to provide investors with the
opportunity to invest in a range of assets depending
on their risk preference. Senior debt issued by SIVs
is structured to be highly rated and the SIVs are
managed within strict operating criteria. Liquidity in
SIVs is primarily managed by rolling over debt at
maturity or, if that is not possible, by the sale of
assets to provide protection to senior debt holders.
SIVs are typically subject to market value and net
asset value triggers which underpin the external
credit ratings of the senior debt. The liquidity risk in
SIVs is managed by controlling the maximum
cumulative cash outflow occurring in defined time
periods.
HSBC sponsored the establishment of two SIVs,
Cullinan and Asscher in August 2005 and May 2007,
respectively, which were successful in obtaining
funding from investors, who subscribed for senior
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Off-balance sheet arrangements and SPEs
debt and capital notes. These SIVs were not
consolidated on inception because HSBC did not
have the majority of risks and rewards of ownership
and it was not anticipated that HSBC would provide
significant funding to these SIVs. HSBC is the
manager for both SIVs, and was committed from
inception to provide limited support by way of
contractually committed liquidity lines on normal
commercial terms.
The maximum size of each SIV during 2007, as
measured by the par value of the SIV’s total assets,
together with the maximum exposure HSBC had
under its committed liquidity facilities, was as
follows:
Maximum
size of
SIV
US$bn
HSBC
committed
liquidity
facility
US$bn
Cullinan .........................................
Asscher .........................................
42.2
8.7
50.9
0.50
0.25
0.75
From mid-August 2007, liquidity in the
wholesale markets became severely disrupted,
principally as a result of valuation concerns over
securities linked to US sub-prime mortgage loans,
resulting in funding difficulties for many SPEs,
including SIVs. At the outset, bank-sponsored SIVs
were less affected and, initially, Cullinan and
Asscher continued to fund themselves in the CP
market.
By the end of the third quarter of 2007, it
became clear that the disruption in the supply of CP
funding for the SIV market was not a temporary
situation and, as a consequence, by the end of
September 2007, HSBC provided US$16.7 billion
of funding to Cullinan and Asscher in the form
of repos, CP purchases and the acquisition of
US$4.1 billion of assets at fair value from Cullinan.
During the same period, the market value of
certain assets held by Cullinan and Asscher fell
because the market liquidity position had weakened
and credit spreads had widened.
From October 2007, all the capital note holders
of Cullinan were given the option to switch their
capital note holdings for a share of the assets of the
SIV. As part of this offer, HSBC switched its entire
holding in Cullinan capital notes for Cullinan assets.
The par value and market value of the assets
purchased amounted to US$709 million and
US$684 million respectively. The consideration paid
comprised HSBC’s capital note holding with an
aggregate par value of US$50 million (fair value
184
US$25 million) and cash of US$659 million. In
addition, in January 2008, HSBC purchased Cullinan
capital notes from existing holders with a par value
of US$171 million (fair value US$39 million), and
then exchanged such Cullinan capital notes, together
with cash of US$2,302 million, for Cullinan assets
with a par value of US$2,473 million and a market
value of US$2,341 million.
In November 2007, HSBC announced its
intention to provide investors in Cullinan and
Asscher with the option to exchange their capital
notes for notes issued by one or more new SPEs,
with term funding and liquidity to be provided by
HSBC.
Based on a careful evaluation of all the facts
and circumstances, HSBC concluded that this
announcement had substantively changed the
relationship HSBC had with these SIVs such that
HSBC was required to consolidate these SIVs from
November 2007.
After the announcement in November 2007,
two new SPEs, an asset-backed commercial paper
conduit and a term funding vehicle, were established
in respect of Cullinan. Each SPE has been set up so
that its continuing operation is not as sensitive as
Cullinan to market value fluctuations in its
underlying assets. These SPEs will be funded either
by CP backed by a 100 per cent liquidity facility
provided by HSBC, or by term funding provided by
HSBC. This reorganisation addresses the two main
challenges for the SIV sector which could force
asset sales: the inability to fund in the CP markets,
and the sensitivity of the continuing operation of
SIVs to changes in the market value of their
underlying assets.
The new SPEs have agreed to purchase
Cullinan’s assets, over a time period that is
anticipated to coincide with the maturity of
Cullinan’s senior debt. The purchase price was
based on the fair value of Cullinan’s assets as
at 21 January 2008.
In January 2008, investors in the capital
notes issued by Cullinan were given the option to
exchange their existing capital notes for the capital
notes in the new SPEs.
On 13 February 2008, the par value of the
capital notes outstanding in Cullinan amounted to
US$1.9 billion. On this date, all the holders of the
remaining capital notes in Cullinan elected to
exchange their existing holding for capital notes in
the new SPEs. The holders of such capital notes will
bear the risks of any losses arising in the new SPEs
up to the par value of their holding in the capital
notes.
The holders of the capital notes in Asscher
continue to bear the risk of any first losses in the
assets held by the SIV. It is proposed to reorganise
Asscher following the completion of the Cullinan
exchange.
The effect of consolidating Cullinan and
Asscher on HSBC’s balance sheet was to include
US$42.5 billion of both assets and liabilities from
November 2007. This included capital notes of
US$38.1 million, holdings of CP of US$4.7 billion
and repos of US$8.5 billion previously recognised
on HSBC’s balance sheet.
An analysis of the assets held by Cullinan and
Asscher at 31 December 2007 and 2006 is set out
below.
Cullinan – Ratings analysis of assets
S&P ratings
AAA .................................................
AA ....................................................
A ......................................................
BBB .................................................
Total investments .............................
Cash and other assets .......................
Total assets ......................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
22.2
2.9
3.1
0.1
28.3
5.0
33.3
23.1
2.3
3.5
0.1
29.0
1.5
30.5
Cullinan – Composition of asset portfolio
Asset class
Structured finance
Residential mortgage-backed
securities ....................................
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities ....................................
Collateralised debt obligations ......
Student loan securities ...................
Home equity lines of credit
securities ....................................
Vehicle finance loans securities ....
Credit loan securities .....................
Other asset-backed securities ........
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
9.9
3.7
3.8
2.2
1.3
0.3
0.1
4.5
11.9
3.9
3.0
2.3
2.0
0.4
0.2
0.8
These assets included US$2 billion (2006:
US$2.7 billion) of exposure to US sub-prime
mortgages, all of which are rated AAA.
Cullinan – Total assets by balance sheet
classification
Derivative assets ...................................................
Loans and advances to banks ...............................
Financial investments ...........................................
Other assets ...........................................................
2007
US$bn
0.2
2.4
30.5
0.2
33.3
Cullinan – Weighted-average maturity of assets
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
0-6 months .....................................
6-12 months ...................................
Greater than 12 months ..................
Total assets .....................................
6.1
1.6
25.6
33.3
1.5
1.0
28.0
30.5
The weighted average life of the portfolio at
31 December 2007 was 4 years (2006: 3.63 years).
Cullinan – Funding structure
2007
Capital notes ..................................
Commercial paper ..........................
Medium-term notes ........................
Term repos executed ......................
2006
Capital notes ..................................
Commercial paper ..........................
Medium-term notes ........................
Provided
by HSBC
US$bn
Total
US$bn
1.0
5.3
19.7
7.1
33.1
1.8
9.1
19.2
30.1
–
2.3
3.8
7.1
13.2
–
–
–
–
The weighted average life of CP funding was
0.56 years (2006: 0.13 years) and the weighted
average life of medium-term note funding was
1.13 years (2006: 0.64 years).
Total structured finance assets ......
25.8
24.5
Asscher – Ratings analysis of assets
Finance
Commercial bank debt
securities and deposits ...............
Investment bank debt securities ....
Finance company debt securities....
Total bank and finance company
assets ..........................................
Total assets ....................................
6.3
0.7
0.5
7.5
33.3
5.1
0.6
0.3
6.0
30.5
S&P ratings
AAA ......................................................................
AA .........................................................................
A ...........................................................................
Total investments ..................................................
Cash and other assets ............................................
Total assets ............................................................
2007
US$bn
6.1
0.4
0.3
6.8
0.6
7.4
185
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Off-balance sheet arrangements and SPEs
Asscher – Composition of asset portfolio
Asset class
Structured finance
Residential mortgage-backed securities ...............
Commercial mortgage-backed securities .............
Collateralised debt obligations .............................
Student loan securities ..........................................
Home equity lines of credit securities ..................
Credit loan securities ............................................
Other asset-backed securities ...............................
Total structured finance assets .............................
Finance
Commercial bank debt securities and deposits ....
Investment bank debt securities ...........................
Finance company debt securities ..........................
Total bank and finance company assets ...............
Total assets ...........................................................
2007
US$bn
3.0
1.3
1.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.1
6.3
1.0
0.1
–
1.1
7.4
These assets included US$42 million of
exposure to US sub-prime mortgages, all of which
are rated AAA.
Asscher – Total assets by balance sheet
classification
Derivative assets ...................................................
Loans and advances to banks ...............................
Financial investments ...........................................
2007
US$bn
0.1
0.7
6.6
7.4
Asscher – Weighted-average maturity of assets
0-6 months ............................................................
6-12 months ..........................................................
Greater than 12 months ........................................
Total assets ...........................................................
2007
US$bn
0.8
0.6
6.0
7.4
The weighted average life of the portfolio at
31 December 2007 was 3.7 years.
Asscher – Funding structure
Mezzanine notes ............................
Commercial paper .........................
Medium-term notes .......................
Term repos executed ......................
2007
Provided
by HSBC
US$bn
Total
US$bn
0.3
2.0
3.5
1.6
7.4
–
0.1
1.5
1.1
2.7
186
The weighted average life of CP funding
liabilities was 0.44 years and the weighted average
life of medium-term note funding liabilities was
1.03 years.
Money market funds
HSBC has established and manages a number of
money market funds which provide customers with
tailored investment opportunities. These SPEs have
narrow and well-defined objectives and typically
HSBC does not have any holdings in the SPEs of
sufficient size to represent the majority of the risks
and rewards of ownership.
In aggregate, HSBC had established money
market funds which had total assets of
US$109 billion at 31 December 2007 (2006:
US$93 billion).
These are the main sub-categories of money
market funds:
• US$57 billion (2006: US$41 billion) in
Constant Net Asset Value (‘CNAV’) funds,
which invest in shorter-dated and highly-rated
money market securities with the objective of
providing investors with a highly liquid and
secure investment;
• US$12 billion (2006: US$15 billion) in French
domiciled dynamique (‘dynamic’) funds and
Irish ‘enhanced’ funds, together Enhanced
Variable Net Asset Value (‘Enhanced VNAV’)
funds, which invest in longer-dated money
market securities to provide investors with a
higher return than traditional money market
funds; and
• US$40 billion (2006: US$37 billion) in various
other money market funds, Variable Net Asset
Value (‘VNAV’) funds including funds
domiciled in Brazil, France, India, Mexico and
other countries.
These money market funds invest in a diverse
portfolio of highly-rated debt instruments, including
limited holdings in instruments issued by SIVs. At
31 December 2007, these funds’ exposure to SIVs
was US$3.9 billion (2006: US$6.8 billion).
CNAV funds
CNAV funds price their assets on an amortised cost
basis, subject to the amortised book value of the
portfolio being within 50 basis points of its market
value. This enables CNAV funds to create and
liquidate shares in the fund at a constant price. If the
amortised value of the portfolio were to vary by
more than 50 basis points from its market value, the
investors accept greater credit and duration risk in
the expectation of higher returns.
Money market activities are highly developed
in France due to the historical restriction on the
payment of interest on current accounts, and the
search for enhanced yields has resulted in
sophisticated money market funds which are
essentially used as an alternative to cash. However,
since July 2007, French dynamic money market
funds have experienced unprecedented redemption
requests caused by the market’s lack of confidence
in funds containing exposure primarily to US
sub-prime assets. In August 2007, the decision by
two French institutions to suspend withdrawals from
certain asset-backed securities funds caused a
general acceleration of redemption requests on
dynamic money market funds.
In the third quarter of 2007, HSBC acquired
underlying assets and shares in two of its dynamic
money market funds of €1.2 billion (US$1.8 billion)
and €0.6 billion (US$0.9 billion) respectively to fund
asset redemptions. No additional shares were
acquired in the fourth quarter. HSBC’s aggregate
holding in these funds at 31 December 2007 was
€0.9 billion (US$1.3 billion). The total AUM
of these two funds at 31 December 2007 was
€2.1 billion (US$3.1 billion). These funds were not
consolidated by HSBC at 31 December 2007
because the acquisition of additional shares in these
funds did not expose HSBC to the majority of risks
and rewards of ownership. However, post year end,
one of the funds has been consolidated by HSBC as
a result of continued redemptions by unit holders
which caused HSBC’s percentage holding in the
funds to increase to a level where HSBC would
obtain the majority of risks and rewards of
ownership.
A further Enhanced VNAV fund experienced
high shareholder redemptions in the fourth quarter
of 2007 which depleted its stock of liquid assets,
reducing its ability to meet further redemption
payments. During November 2007, HSBC made two
purchases of shares in the fund for US$0.3 billion
and US$0.1 billion, respectively, to fund asset
redemptions. This resulted in HSBC consolidating
the fund because its resultant holding of 52 per cent
represents the majority of risks and rewards
of ownership.
CNAV fund would be required to price its assets at
market value, and consequently would no longer be
able to create or liquidate shares at a constant price.
This is commonly known as ‘breaking the buck’.
HSBC’s CNAV funds hold senior notes issued
by a number of SIVs and, due to current market
liquidity conditions and consequential actions of the
rating agencies, the market value of this SIV paper
has deteriorated. This has caused the CNAV funds to
record unrealised losses on their SIV investments.
While the majority of these SIVs are bank-
sponsored, and are not judged to be impaired, there
are holdings in three independent SIVs which have
experienced greater difficulties; two of these, in
which HSBC’s CNAV funds have invested
US$0.3 billion, were placed in enforcement in
early 2008; the process by which the winding down
of the independent SIVs and repaying secured
creditors begins.
The deterioration in the market value of
holdings of SIV paper raised the possibility that
certain CNAV funds would be forced to realise
liquid assets to meet potential redemptions. To help
address this potential impact, on 24 December 2007,
HSBC provided two letters of limited indemnity,
capped at US$33 million and £4 million
(US$8 million) respectively, in relation to certain
holdings of SIV assets of two of its CNAV funds
with total assets under management (‘AUM’) at
31 December 2007 of US$27.1 billion. These limited
indemnities did not result in HSBC consolidating
these funds because HSBC was not exposed to the
majority of the risks and rewards of ownership and
the investors of the funds continue to bear the first
loss. Separately, in December 2007, HSBC acquired
US$0.3 billion of SIV paper at fair value from these
CNAV funds.
Since 31 December 2007, HSBC has
provided two additional letters of limited indemnity
capped at US$33 million and £2 million
(US$4 million) respectively, in relation to certain
holdings of SIV assets of a further two CNAV funds
with AUM at 31 December 2007 of US$8.7 billion.
HSBC is not exposed to the majority of risks and
rewards of ownership of the funds.
HSBC has continued to create and liquidate
shares in all its CNAV funds at a constant price.
Enhanced VNAV funds
Enhanced VNAV funds price their assets on a fair
value basis and consequently prices may change
from one day to the next. These funds pursue an
‘enhanced’ investment strategy, as part of which
187
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Off-balance sheet arrangements and SPEs
Total assets of HSBC’s money market funds
CNAV funds ..................................
Enhanced VNAV funds .................
VNAV funds ..................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
56.8
11.9
40.2
108.9
40.9
15.2
36.9
93.0
Total assets of HSBC’s money market funds, which
are off-balance sheet
CNAV funds ..................................
Enhanced VNAV funds .................
VNAV funds ..................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
56.8
6.2
40.2
103.2
40.9
13.1
36.9
90.9
HSBC’s financial investments in off-balance
sheet money market funds at 31 December
2007 amounted to US$2.9 billion (2006:
US$0.7 billion). These assets have been classified
as available-for-sale securities and measured at fair
value.
Total assets of HSBC’s money market funds
which are on-balance sheet at 31 December 2007
amounted to US$5.7 billion (2006: US$2.1 billion).
These assets have been measured at fair value;
US$0.7 billion (2006: nil) were classified as trading
assets, and US$5 billion (2006: US$2.1 billion) were
designated at fair value.
Non-money market investment funds
HSBC has also established a large number of non-
money market funds to enable customers to invest in
a range of assets, typically equities and debt
securities. At the launch of a fund HSBC, as fund
manager, typically provides a limited amount of
initial capital known as ‘seed capital’ to enable the
fund to start purchasing assets. These holdings are
normally redeemed over time. The majority of these
funds are off-balance sheet because in view of
HSBC’s limited economic interest, HSBC does not
have the majority of the risks and rewards of
ownership.
Total assets of HSBC’s non-money market funds
Assets under management
Specialist funds ..............................
Local Investment Management
funds ..........................................
Multi-manager ...............................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
132.0
123.3
108.8
30.4
89.9
22.3
271.2
235.5
188
Total assets of HSBC’s non-money market funds
which are off-balance sheet
Specialist funds ..............................
Local Investment Management
funds ..........................................
Multi-manager ...............................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
131.0
122.9
105.7
30.4
88.0
22.3
267.1
233.2
HSBC’s financial investments in off-balance
sheet non-money market funds at 31 December
2007 amounted to US$2.7 billion (2006:
US$2.0 billion). These assets have been classified
as available-for-sale securities and measured at
fair value.
Total assets of HSBC’s non-money market funds,
which are on-balance sheet
Specialist funds ..............................
Local Investment Management
funds ..........................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
1.0
3.1
4.1
0.4
1.9
2.3
Total assets of HSBC’s non-money market funds
which are on-balance sheet, by balance sheet
classification
Cash ................................................
Trading assets ................................
Financial instruments
designated at fair value ..............
Financial investments ....................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
0.4
0.5
3.0
0.2
4.1
0.2
0.2
1.8
0.1
2.3
Conduits
HSBC sponsors and manages two types of conduits
which issue CP; multi-seller conduits and securities
investment conduits. HSBC consolidated these
conduits from inception because it is exposed to the
majority of risks and rewards of ownership.
Multi-seller conduits have been established for
the purpose of providing alternative sources of
financing to HSBC’s clients, for example, in respect
of discrete pools of vehicle finance loan receivables.
The multi-seller conduits purchase or fund
interests in diversified pools of third party assets,
which are financed by the issuance of CP. The cash
flows received by the conduits are utilised to service
payments to clients and to provide a commercial rate
of return for HSBC. CP issued by the multi-seller
conduits carries highly liquid short-term ratings, and
benefits from liquidity facilities typically provided
by HSBC. HSBC also provides secondary credit
enhancements under the terms specified in the
relevant programme documentation. HSBC’s multi-
seller conduits are Regency Assets Limited
(‘Regency’), Bryant Park Funding LLC (‘Bryant
Park’), Abington Square Funding LLC (‘Abington
Square’), and Performance Trust.
Due to lack of investor interest from the middle
of 2007 in extendable CP, including that issued by
Abington Square, HSBC provided finance to the
conduit by purchasing the majority of its extendable
CP from investors. In February 2008, the remaining
assets within the conduit were refinanced and the CP
repaid. The other multi-seller conduits are supported
by liquidity facilities typically provided by HSBC.
While these facilities do not provide for liquidity
payments against defaulted assets they will in all
cases provide for repayment of 100 per cent of CP
that is covered by non-defaulted receivables.
Performance Trust was originally consolidated
by HSBC, and later deconsolidated because HSBC
retired the programme-wide credit enhancement and
the first loss note was sold to a third party during
2006. However, due to lack of liquidity in the
market, Performance Trust experienced funding
difficulties in the fourth quarter of 2007 and HSBC
purchased Performance Trust’s CP as it became
due. This resulted in HSBC consolidating the fund
because its resultant holding of 83 per cent
represents the majority of risks and rewards
of ownership.
Securities investment conduits purchase
highly rated asset-backed securities and facilitate
tailored investment opportunities for HSBC’s
investor clients. HSBC’s securities investment
conduit is Solitaire Funding Limited (‘Solitaire’).
An analysis of the assets held by Solitaire at
31 December 2007 and 2006 is set out below.
Solitaire – Ratings analysis of assets
S&P Ratings
AAA ...............................................
Total investments ...........................
Cash and other assets .....................
Total assets ....................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
20.8
20.8
0.8
21.6
20.2
20.2
0.2
20.4
Solitaire – Composition of asset portfolio
Asset class
Structured finance
Residential mortgage-backed
securities ....................................
Commercial mortgage-backed
securities ....................................
Collateralised debt obligations ......
Student loans securities ..................
Home equity lines of credit
securities .....................................
Vehicle finance loans securities .....
Credit loans securities.....................
Other asset-back securities ............
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
8.7
3.7
3.1
3.5
0.6
0.1
0.3
1.0
9.4
3.1
2.5
3.0
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.9
Total structured finance assets .......
21.0
20.2
Finance
Commercial bank debt
securities and deposits ...............
0.6
Total bank and finance
company assets ..........................
Total assets .....................................
0.6
21.6
0.2
0.2
20.4
These assets include US$1.1 billion (2006:
US$1.8 billion) of exposure to US sub-prime
mortgages, all of which are rated AAA.
Solitaire – Total assets by balance sheet
classification
Financial instruments
designated at fair value ..............
Derivative assets ............................
Loans and advances to banks ........
Financial investments ....................
Other assets ....................................
Solitaire – Funding structure
2007
Commercial paper ..........................
2006
Commercial paper ..........................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
0.1
0.1
0.2
20.6
0.6
21.6
0.1
–
–
20.1
0.2
20.4
Provided
by HSBC
US$bn
Total
US$bn
23.0
7.8
20.2
–
The consolidation of HSBC’s conduits resulted
in HSBC consolidating assets of US$37.4 billion
(2006: US$35.0 billion, excluding Performance
Trust).
189
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Financial Review (continued)
Other financial information > Off-balance sheet arrangements and SPEs
Total assets of HSBC’s conduits by balance sheet
classification, which are on-balance sheet
Total assets of HSBC’s securitisations, which are
off-balance sheet
Financial instruments
designated at fair value ..............
Derivative assets ............................
Loans and advances to banks ........
Loans and advances to
customers ...................................
Financial investments ....................
Other assets ....................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
0.1
0.1
0.2
14.9
21.1
1.0
37.4
0.1
–
–
9.6
24.6
0.7
35.0
Securitisations
HSBC uses SPEs to securitise customer loans and
advances it has originated mainly in order to
diversify its sources of funding, and for capital
efficiency. In such cases, the loans and advances are
transferred by HSBC to the SPEs for cash, and the
SPEs issue debt securities to investors. Credit
enhancements are used to obtain investment grade
ratings on the senior debt issued by the SPEs.
Except for one securitisation, with total assets
of US$0.5 billion (2006: US$0.5 billion), where the
SPE has not been consolidated because HSBC does
not have the majority of risks and rewards of
ownership, these SPEs are consolidated by HSBC.
HSBC also established term securitisation
programmes in the US and Germany where third
party loans are securitised. The majority of these
vehicles are not consolidated by HSBC as it is not
exposed to majority of risks and rewards of
ownership in the SPEs.
HSBC also uses SPEs for capital management
purposes in respect of its originated customer loans
and advances, where only the credit risk associated
with the customer loans and advances is transferred
by HSBC to the SPE using credit derivatives. These
securitisations are commonly known as synthetic
securitisations. These SPEs are consolidated where
HSBC is exposed to the majority of risks and
rewards of ownership.
Total assets of HSBC’s securitisations, by balance
sheet classification, which are on-balance sheet
Trading assets ................................
Loans and advances to
customers ...................................
Financial investments ....................
Other assets ....................................
Derivatives .....................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
3.6
0.3
70.5
0.1
1.5
0.1
75.8
68.7
0.2
3.0
–
72.2
190
HSBC originated assets ..................
Non-HSBC originated assets –
term securitisation
programmes .................................
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
0.5
0.5
17.3
17.8
17.3
17.8
HSBC’s financial investments in off-balance
sheet securitisations at 31 December 2007 amounted
to US$0.7 billion (2006: US$0.7 billion). These
assets include assets that have been securitised by
HSBC under arrangements in which HSBC retains a
continuing involvement in such assets which are
classified as available-for-sale securities and
measured at fair value. Further details are provided
in Note 20 on the Financial Statements.
Other
HSBC also establishes SPEs in the normal course of
business for a number of purposes, for example,
structured credit transactions for customers to
provide finance to public and private sector
infrastructure projects, and for asset and structured
finance (‘ASF’) transactions.
Structured credit transactions
HSBC provides structured credit transactions to third
party professional and institutional investors who
wish to obtain exposure, sometimes on a leveraged
basis, to a reference portfolio of debt instruments.
The investors obtain the risks and rewards of the
relevant reference portfolios by purchasing notes
issued by the SPEs. The SPEs enter into contracts
with HSBC, generally in the form of derivatives, in
order to pass the risks and rewards of the reference
portfolios to the SPEs. HSBC’s risk in relation to the
derivative contracts with the SPEs is managed within
HSBC’s trading market risk framework (see Market
Risk Management on page 248).
The transactions are facilitated through SPEs in
order that the notes issued to the investors can be
rated. The SPEs are not consolidated by HSBC
because the investors bear substantially all the risks
and rewards of ownership through the notes. The
exception would be in circumstances where HSBC
itself holds a majority of the notes in particular
SPEs.
The total fair value of liabilities (notes issued
and derivatives) in structured credit transaction SPEs
amounted to US$23.6 billion at 31 December 2007
(2006: US$7.9 billion). These amounts include
Other exposures to third party SIVs, conduits and
securitisations where a liquidity facility has been
provided
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
Derivative assets ..............................
0.2
0.1
Other off-balance sheet arrangements and
commitments
Financial guarantees, letters of credit and
similar undertakings
Note 41 on the Financial Statements describes
various types of guarantees and discloses the
maximum potential future payments under such
arrangements. Credit risk associated with all forms
of guarantees is assessed in the same manner as
for on-balance sheet credit advances and, where
necessary, provisions for assessed impairment are
included in ‘Other provisions’.
Commitments to lend
Undrawn credit lines are disclosed in Note 41 on the
Financial Statements. The majority by value of
undrawn credit lines arise from ‘open to buy’ lines
on personal credit cards, advised overdraft limits and
other pre-approved loan products, and mortgage
offers awaiting customer acceptance. HSBC
generally has the right to change or terminate any
conditions of a personal customer’s overdraft, credit
card or other credit line upon notification to the
customer. In respect of corporate commitments
to lend, in most cases HSBC’s position will be
protected through restrictions on access to funding
in the event of material adverse change.
Leveraged finance transactions
Loan commitments in respect of leveraged finance
transactions are accounted for as derivatives where it
is HSBC’s intention to sell the loan after origination.
As at 31 December 2007, HSBC’s commitments in
respect of leveraged finance transactions were
US$8.9 billion, of which US$6.0 billion were funded
and US$2.9 billion were unfunded. During 2007,
losses of US$195 million were recognised in trading
income relating to transactions priced prior to the
dislocation in the market. Transactions priced
subsequent to the widening of credit spreads have
not resulted in any material net write-downs.
US$0.1 billion (2006: US$0.7 billion) in SPEs that
were consolidated by HSBC.
Other uses of SPEs
HSBC participates in ‘Public-Private Partnerships’
to provide financial support for infrastructure
projects initiated by government authorities. The
funding structure is commonly achieved through the
use of SPEs. HSBC consolidates these SPEs where
it is exposed to the majority of risks and rewards of
the vehicles.
HSBC’s ASF business specialises in leasing and
arranging finance for aircraft and other physical
assets, which it is customary to ring-fence through
the use of SPEs, and in structured loans and deposits
where SPEs introduce cost efficiencies. HSBC
consolidates these SPEs where the substance of the
relationship indicates that HSBC controls the SPE.
HSBC’s risks and rewards of ownership in these
SPEs are in respect of its on-balance sheet assets and
liabilities.
Third party sponsored SPEs
HSBC’s exposure to third party sponsored SIVs,
conduits and securitisations have arisen through
normal banking arrangements on standard market
terms. HSBC did not provide any credit
enhancement to third party SIVs, conduits and
securitisations.
HSBC’s commitments under liquidity facilities to
third party SIVs, conduits and securitisations
Commit-
ments
Drawn
US$bn
US$bn
2007
Third party SIVs ............................
Third party conduits ......................
Third party securitisations .............
2006
Third party SIVs ............................
Third party conduits ......................
Third party securitisations .............
0.3
5.3
0.5
6.1
0.2
5.4
0.5
6.1
–
0.4
–
0.4
–
–
–
–
191
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk
Regulation and supervision
Regulation and supervision1 .......................
Risk management1 ......................................
Credit risk ...................................................
Credit risk management2 ........................
Credit exposure3 .....................................
Areas of special interest1 ......................
Credit quality3 .........................................
Impairment allowances and charges3 ......
HSBC Holdings2 .....................................
Risk elements in the loan portfolio1 ........
Liquidity and funding management ............
Policies and procedures2 .........................
Primary sources of funding2 ...................
HSBC Holdings2 .....................................
Market risk management ............................
Value at risk3 ..........................................
Trading portfolios2 ..................................
Non-trading portfolios2 ...........................
Sensitivity of net interest income1 ...........
Structural foreign exchange exposures1 .
HSBC Holdings3 .....................................
Areas of special interest2 .........................
Residual value risk management1 ...............
Operational risk management1 ...................
Legal risk1 ...............................................
Global security and fraud1 .......................
Pension risk1 ...............................................
Reputational risk management1 ..................
Sustainability risk management1 ................
Risk management of insurance
Page
192
197
198
198
203
216
223
229
240
241
243
243
243
247
248
249
251
252
254
256
256
257
260
260
261
262
262
263
263
operations2 ..............................................
Life insurance business2 ...........................
Non-life insurance business2 ....................
Insurance risk2 ........................................
Financial risks2 .......................................
Present value of in-force long-term
insurance business2 .............................
Capital management and allocation ............
Capital management2 ..............................
Capital measurement and allocation3 .....
Risk-weighted assets by principal
264
264
265
265
271
280
282
282
282
subsidiary1 ............................................
286
1 Unaudited.
2 Audited.
3 Audited where indicated.
192
Regulation and supervision
(Unaudited)
With listings of its ordinary shares in London, Hong
Kong, New York, Paris and Bermuda, HSBC
Holdings complies with the relevant requirements
for listing and trading on each of these exchanges. In
the UK, these are the Listing Rules of the Financial
Services Authority (‘FSA’); in Hong Kong, The
Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The
Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (‘HKSE’);
in the US, where the shares are traded in the form of
ADSs, HSBC Holdings’ shares are registered with
the US Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘SEC’). As a consequence of its US listing, HSBC
Holdings is also subject to the reporting and other
requirements of the US Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the New York Stock Exchange’s
(‘NYSE’) Listed Company Manual, in each case as
applied to foreign private issuers. In France and
Bermuda, HSBC Holdings is subject to the listing
rules of Euronext, Paris and the Bermuda Stock
Exchange respectively, applicable to companies with
secondary listings.
A statement of HSBC’s compliance with the
code provisions of the Combined Code on Corporate
Governance issued by the Financial Reporting
Council and with the Code on Corporate Governance
Practices in Appendix 14 to the Rules Governing the
Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited is set out in the ‘Report of the
Directors: Governance’ on page 289.
HSBC’s operations throughout the world are
regulated and supervised by approximately
510 different central banks and regulatory authorities
in those jurisdictions in which HSBC has offices,
branches or subsidiaries. These authorities impose a
variety of requirements and controls designed to
improve financial stability and the transparency of
financial markets and their contribution to economic
growth. These regulations and controls cover, inter
alia, capital adequacy, depositor protection, market
liquidity, governance standards, customer protection
(for example, fair lending practices, product design,
and marketing and documentation standards), and
social responsibility obligations (for example, anti-
money laundering and anti-terrorist financing
measures). In addition, a number of countries in
which HSBC operates impose rules that affect, or
place limitations on, foreign or foreign-owned or
controlled banks and financial institutions. The rules
include restrictions on the opening of local offices,
branches or subsidiaries and the types of banking
and non-banking activities that may be conducted by
those local offices, branches or subsidiaries;
restrictions on the acquisition of local banks or
regulations requiring a specified percentage of local
ownership; and restrictions on investment and other
financial flows entering or leaving the country. The
supervisory and regulatory regimes of the countries
where HSBC operates will determine to some degree
HSBC’s ability to expand into new markets, the
services and products that HSBC will be able to
offer in those markets and how HSBC structures
specific operations.
The FSA supervises HSBC on a consolidated
basis. In addition, each operating bank, finance
company or insurance operation within HSBC is
regulated by local supervisors. The primary
regulatory authorities are those in the UK, Hong
Kong and the US, the Group’s principal areas of
operation.
In June 2004, the Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision introduced a new capital adequacy
framework to replace the 1988 Basel Capital Accord
in the form of a final Accord (commonly known as
‘Basel II’). Details of the EU’s implementation of
Basel II and how this will affect HSBC are set out
on page 284.
UK regulation and supervision
UK banking and financial services institutions are
subject to multiple regulations. The primary UK
statute is the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (‘FSMA’). Additionally, data privacy is
regulated by the Data Protection Act 1998. Other
UK financial services legislation is derived from EU
directives relating to banking, securities, insurance,
investment and sales of personal financial services.
The FSA is responsible for authorising and
supervising UK financial services institutions and
regulates all HSBC’s businesses in the UK which
require authorisation under the FSMA. These
include deposit taking, retail banking, life and
general insurance, pensions, investments, mortgages,
custody and branch share-dealing businesses, and
treasury and capital markets activity. HSBC Bank is
HSBC’s principal authorised institution in the UK.
FSA rules establish the minimum criteria for
authorisation for banks and financial services
businesses in the UK. They also set out reporting
(and, as applicable, consent) requirements with
regard to large individual exposures and large
exposures to related borrowers. In its capacity as
supervisor of HSBC on a consolidated basis, the
FSA receives information on the capital adequacy of,
and sets requirements for, HSBC as a whole. Further
details on capital measurement are included in
‘Capital management and allocation’ on pages 282 to
193
284. The FSA’s approach to capital requirements for
UK insurers is to require minimum capital to be
calculated on two bases. First, firms must calculate
their liabilities on a prudent basis and add a statutory
solvency margin (Pillar 1). Secondly, firms must
calculate their liabilities on a realistic basis then add
to this their own calculation of risk-based capital.
The sum of realistic reserves and risk-based capital
(Pillar 2) is agreed with the FSA. Insurers are
required to maintain capital equal to the higher of
Pillars 1 and 2. The FSA has the right to object, on
prudential grounds, to persons who hold, or intend to
hold, 10 per cent or more of the voting power of a
financial institution.
The regulatory framework of the UK financial
services system has traditionally been based on
co-operation between the FSA and authorised
institutions. The FSA monitors authorised
institutions through ongoing supervision and the
review of routine and ad hoc reports relating to
financial and prudential matters. The FSA may
periodically obtain independent reports, usually from
the auditors of the authorised institution, as to the
adequacy of internal control procedures and systems
as well as procedures and systems governing records
and accounting. The FSA meets regularly with
HSBC’s senior executives to discuss HSBC’s
adherence to the FSA’s prudential guidelines. They
also regularly discuss fundamental matters relating
to HSBC’s business in the UK and internationally,
including areas such as strategic and operating plans,
risk control, loan portfolio composition and
organisational changes, including succession
planning.
Consumers of UK financial services institutions
are covered by the Financial Services Compensation
Scheme (‘FSCS’), which is the UK’s statutory fund
of last resort. It deals with claims against authorised
institutions that are unable, or likely to be unable, to
pay claims against them, for example if an institution
has stopped trading or is in insolvency. FSCS
protects deposits, investments, insurance and
mortgage advice and arranging, and is funded by
levies on institutions authorised by the FSA. The
maximum levels of compensation are available on
www.fscs.org.uk/consumer.
Hong Kong regulation and supervision
Banking in Hong Kong is subject to the provisions
of the Banking Ordinance, and to the powers,
functions and duties ascribed by the Banking
Ordinance to the Hong Kong Monetary Authority
(the ‘HKMA’). The principal function of the HKMA
is to promote the general stability and effective
working of the banking system in Hong Kong. The
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Regulation and supervision
HKMA is responsible for supervising compliance
with the provisions of the Banking Ordinance. The
Banking Ordinance gives power to the Chief
Executive of Hong Kong to give directions to the
HKMA and the Financial Secretary with respect to
the exercise of their respective functions under the
Banking Ordinance.
The HKMA has responsibility for authorising
banks, and has discretion to attach conditions to its
authorisation. The HKMA requires that banks or
their holding companies file regular prudential
returns, and holds regular discussions with the
management of the banks to review their operations.
The HKMA may also conduct ‘on-site’ examinations
of banks and, in the case of banks incorporated in
Hong Kong, of any local and overseas branches and
subsidiaries. The HKMA requires all authorised
institutions to have adequate systems of internal
control and requires the institutions’ external
auditors, upon request, to report on those systems
and other matters such as the accuracy of
information provided to the HKMA. In addition, the
HKMA may from time to time conduct tripartite
discussions with banks and their external auditors.
The HKMA, which may deny the acquisition of
voting power of over 10 per cent in a bank, and may
attach conditions to its approval thereof, can
effectively control changes in the ownership and
control of Hong Kong-incorporated financial
institutions. In addition, the HKMA has the power to
divest controlling interests in a bank from persons if
they are no longer deemed to be fit and proper, if
they may otherwise threaten the interests of
depositors or potential depositors, or if they have
contravened any conditions specified by the HKMA.
The HKMA may revoke authorisation in the event of
an institution’s non-compliance with the provisions
of the Banking Ordinance. These provisions require,
among other things, the furnishing of accurate
reports.
The Banking Ordinance requires that banks
submit to the HKMA certain returns and other
information and establishes certain minimum
standards and ratios relating to capital adequacy
(see below), liquidity, capitalisation, limitations on
shareholdings, exposure to any one customer,
unsecured advances to persons affiliated with the
bank and holdings of interests in land, with which
banks must comply.
The HKMA implemented Basel II with effect
from 1 January 2007 for all Authorised Institutions
incorporated in Hong Kong. As under Basel I, each
Authorised Institution is required to maintain a
capital adequacy ratio (calculated as the ratio of the
194
bank’s capital base to its risk-weighted exposure) of
at least 8 per cent. For banks with subsidiaries, the
HKMA is empowered to require that the ratio be
calculated on a solo and consolidated basis. The
HKMA is empowered to increase the minimum
capital adequacy ratio (to up to 16 per cent), after
consultation with the bank.
Hong Kong depositors are covered by the
Deposit Protection Scheme, which covers deposits
kept with licensed banks in Hong Kong. All such
banks are scheme members unless specifically
exempted, and are required to contribute to the
funding of the scheme. In the event of the insolvency
of a scheme member, each depositor is entitled to
receive up to HK$100,000. Only traditional Hong
Kong dollar or foreign currency deposits in Hong
Kong are covered by the scheme and other deposit
products like structured deposits, secured deposits,
bearer instruments and offshore deposits are not
protected.
The marketing of, dealing in and provision of
advice and asset management services in relation to
securities in Hong Kong are subject to the provisions
of the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong
Kong (‘Securities and Futures Ordinance’). Entities
engaging in activities regulated by the Securities and
Futures Ordinance are required to be licensed. The
HKMA is the primary regulator for banks involved
in the securities business, while the Securities and
Futures Commission is the regulator for non-banking
entities.
In Hong Kong, insurance business is regulated
under the Insurance Companies Ordinance and by
the Insurance Authority of Hong Kong. The IAHK
is responsible for the licensing of insurers and
insurance brokers, although insurance business can
also be licensed by the Confederation of Insurance
Brokers (‘CIB’). Separately, insurance agents are
licensed by the Hong Kong Federation of Insurers
(‘HKFI’). Both the HKFI and the CIB have enacted
Codes of Conduct for insurance agents and brokers
respectively and can impose sanctions for
misbehaviour or breach.
HSBC Insurance (Asia-Pacific) Holdings
Limited (‘INAH’) is licensed by the IA as an insurer.
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation,
which is authorised by the HKFI, acts as an agent for
INAH, and HSBC Insurance Brokers (Asia-Pacific)
Limited acts as insurance brokers licensed by the
CIB.
US regulation and supervision
HSBC is subject to extensive federal and state
supervision and regulation in the US. Banking laws
and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board, the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (‘OCC’)
and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(‘FDIC’) govern many aspects of HSBC’s US
business.
HSBC and its US operations are subject to
supervision, regulation and examination by the
Federal Reserve Board because HSBC is a ‘bank
holding company’ under the US Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956 (‘BHCA’). HSBC and HSBC
North America Holdings Inc. (‘HNAH’), formed to
hold HSBC’s US and Canadian operations, are ‘bank
holding companies’ by virtue of their ownership and
control of HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (‘HSBC Bank
USA’), HSBC National Bank USA (‘HSBC Bank
Maryland’), and HSBC Trust Company (Delaware),
N.A. (‘HSBC Bank Delaware’). These three banks
are nationally chartered FDIC-insured, full-service
commercial banks and members of the Federal
Reserve System. HSBC also owns HSBC Bank
Nevada, N.A. (‘HSBC Bank Nevada’), a nationally
chartered bank limited to credit card activities which
is also a member of the Federal Reserve System.
These four banks are subject to regulation,
supervision and examination by the OCC and, as
their deposits are insured by the FDIC, they are
subject to relevant FDIC regulation. Both HSBC and
HNAH are registered as financial holding companies
(‘FHC’s) under the BHCA, enabling them to offer a
broad range of financial products and services
through their subsidiaries. HSBC’s and HNAH’s
ability to engage in expanded financial activities as
FHCs depends upon HSBC and HNAH continuing
to meet certain criteria set forth in the BHCA,
including requirements that their US depository
institution subsidiaries, HSBC Bank USA, HSBC
Bank Maryland, HSBC Bank Nevada and HSBC
Bank Delaware, be ‘well capitalised’ and ‘well
managed’, and that such institutions have achieved at
least a satisfactory record in meeting community
credit needs during their most recent examinations
pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act. These
requirements also apply to Wells Fargo HSBC Trade
Bank, N.A., in which HSBC and HNAH have a
20 per cent voting interest in equity capital and a
40 per cent economic interest. Each of these
depository institutions achieved at least the required
rating during their most recent examinations. At
31 December 2007, HSBC Bank USA, HSBC Bank
Maryland, HSBC Bank Nevada, HSBC Bank
Delaware and Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A.
were each well capitalised and well managed under
Federal Reserve Board regulations.
In general, under the BHCA, an FHC would be
required, upon notice by the Federal Reserve Board,
195
to enter into an agreement with the Federal Reserve
Board to correct any failure to comply with the
requirements to maintain FHC status. Until such
deficiencies are corrected, the Federal Reserve
Board may impose limitations on the US activities of
an FHC and depository institutions under its control.
If such deficiencies are not corrected, the Federal
Reserve Board may require an FHC to divest its
control of any subsidiary depository institution or to
desist from certain financial activities in the US.
HSBC and HNAH are generally prohibited
under the BHCA from acquiring, directly or
indirectly, ownership or control of more than 5 per
cent of any class of voting shares of, or substantially
all the assets of, or exercising control over, any US
bank, bank holding company or many other types
of depository institutions and/or their holding
companies without the prior approval of the Federal
Reserve Board and potentially other US banking
regulatory agencies.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
(‘GLBA’) and the regulations issued thereunder
contained a number of other provisions that affect
HSBC’s operations and the operations of all
financial institutions. One such provision contained
detailed requirements relating to the financial
privacy of consumers. In addition, the so-called
‘push-out’ provisions of GLBA removed the blanket
exemption from registration for securities activities
conducted in banks (including HSBC Bank USA)
under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. New
rules have been published to implement these
changes and, when effective, will allow banks to
continue to avoid registration as a broker or dealer
only if they conduct securities activities that fall
within a set of defined exceptions. A narrowed
‘dealer’ definition took effect in September 2003,
and a narrowed ‘broker’ definition will take effect
for each bank on the first day of its fiscal year
following 30 September 2008. Pursuant to the new
regulations, it is likely that certain securities
activities currently conducted by HSBC Bank USA
will need to be restructured or transferred to one or
more US-registered broker-dealer affiliates effective
from 1 January 2009.
The US is party to the 1988 Basel I Capital
Accord, and US banking regulatory authorities have
adopted capital requirements for US banks and bank
holding companies that are generally consistent with
the Accord.
The authorities have now published, on
7 December 2007, their final Basel II rules for credit
and operational risk. These require mandated
banking groups, which include HNAH, to have fully
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Regulation and supervision / Risk management
implemented Basel II by no later than 36 months
after 1 April 2008, including the completion of a full
12-month parallel run. HSBC is analysing the rules
to ensure that systems and processes, already largely
developed and implemented, are aligned with the
final requirements.
In addition, US banking authorities have
adopted ‘leverage’ capital requirements that
generally require US banks and bank holding
companies to maintain a minimum amount of capital
in relation to their balance sheet assets (measured on
a non-risk-weighted basis).
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act of 1991 provides for extensive
regulation of insured depository institutions (such as
HSBC Bank USA, HSBC Bank Maryland, HSBC
Bank Delaware, HSBC Bank Nevada and Wells
Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A.), including requiring
federal banking regulators to take ‘prompt corrective
action’ with respect to FDIC-insured banks that do
not meet minimum capital requirements.
HSBC Bank USA, HSBC Bank Maryland,
HSBC Bank Delaware, HSBC Bank Nevada and
Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A., like other
FDIC-insured banks, may be required to pay
assessments to the FDIC for deposit insurance under
the FDIC’s Bank Insurance Fund. Under the FDIC’s
risk-based system for setting deposit insurance
assessments, an institution’s assessments vary
according to the level of capital an institution holds,
its deposit levels and other factors.
The USA Patriot Act (‘Patriot Act’) imposes
significant record keeping and customer identity
requirements, expands the US federal government’s
powers to freeze or confiscate assets and increases
the available penalties that may be assessed against
financial institutions for failure to comply with
obligations imposed on such institutions to detect,
prevent and report money laundering and terrorist
financing. Pursuant to the Patriot Act, final
regulations are in effect which impose anti-money
laundering compliance obligations on financial
institutions (a term which, for this purpose, includes
insured US depository institutions, US branches and
agencies of foreign banks, US broker-dealers and
numerous other entities). Many of the anti-money
laundering compliance requirements imposed by the
Patriot Act and these implementing regulations are
generally consistent with the anti-money laundering
compliance obligations existing for banks prior to
the Patriot Act. These include requirements to
adopt and implement an anti-money laundering
programme, report suspicious transactions and
implement due diligence procedures for certain
196
correspondent and private banking accounts. Certain
other specific requirements of the Patriot Act were
new compliance obligations. The passage of the
Patriot Act and other recent events have resulted in
heightened scrutiny of the Bank Secrecy Act and
anti-money laundering compliance by federal and
state bank examiners.
The HSBC Group takes its obligations to
prevent money laundering and terrorist financing
very seriously. HSBC has policies, procedures and
training intended to ensure that its employees know
and understand HSBC’s criteria for when a client
relationship or business should be evaluated as
higher risk. As part of its continuing evaluation of
risk, the HSBC Group monitors its activities in
countries and entities subject to US economic
sanctions programmes administered by the Office of
Foreign Assets Control. HSBC’s business activities
include correspondent banking services to banks
located in some of these countries and private
banking services for nationals of, and clients
domiciled in, some of the countries. The Group
has a small representative office in Tehran, Iran.
The US State Department has designated certain
countries (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and
Syria) as state sponsors of terrorism, and US law
generally prohibits US persons from doing business
with such countries. HSBC is aware of initiatives by
governmental entities and institutions in the US to
adopt rules, regulations or policies prohibiting
transactions with or investments in entities doing
business with such countries. The HSBC Group does
not believe its business activities with counterparties
in, or directly relating to, such countries are material
to its business, and such activities represented a very
small part of total assets at 31 December 2007 and
total revenues for the year ended 31 December 2007.
If HSBC were to fail to maintain and implement
adequate programmes to combat money laundering
and terrorist financing and to comply with economic
sanctions, or was found to be in breach of relevant
laws and regulations, including by failing to observe
economic sanctions, serious legal and reputational
consequences for the Group could arise.
HSBC’s US insurance agency and underwriting
operations are subject to regulatory supervision
under the laws of the states in which they operate.
Insurance laws and regulations vary from state to
state but generally require forms and rates to be filed
with, and approved by, the state insurance
departments, and cover licensing of insurance
companies; corporate governance; premiums and
loss rates; dividend restrictions; types of insurance
that may be sold; underwriting processes;
permissible investments; reserve requirements; and
insurance advertising and marketing practices. Each
HSBC US insurance subsidiary undergoes periodic
market conduct and financial examinations by the
relevant state insurance departments, and HSBC’s
insurance agencies and agents are subject to state
licensing and registration requirements.
Additionally, with respect to credit insurance,
because it is sold in connection with a loan, state
loan laws often contain requirements related to
offering, cancelling and refunding credit insurance.
Although insurance is not generally regulated by the
federal government, certain federal regulations
related to lending disclosures apply to the sale and
cancellation of credit insurance.
HSBC’s US consumer finance operations are
subject to extensive state-by-state regulation in the
US, and to laws relating to consumer protection
(both in general, and in respect of sub-prime lending
operations, which have been subject to enhanced
regulatory scrutiny); discrimination in extending
credit; use of credit reports; privacy matters;
disclosure of credit terms; and correction of billing
errors. They also are subject to regulations and
legislation that limit operations in certain
jurisdictions. For example, limitations may be placed
on the amount of interest or fees that a loan may
bear, the amount that may be borrowed, the types of
actions that may be taken to collect or foreclose
upon delinquent loans or the information about a
customer that may be shared. HSBC’s US consumer
finance branch lending offices are generally licensed
in those jurisdictions in which they operate. Such
licences have limited terms but are renewable, and
are revocable for cause. Failure to comply with
applicable laws and regulations may limit the ability
of these licensed lenders to collect or enforce loan
agreements made with consumers and may cause the
consumer finance lending subsidiary and/or its
control person to be liable for damages and
penalties.
HSBC’s US credit insurance operations are
subject to regulatory supervision under the laws of
the states in which they operate. Regulations vary
from state to state but generally cover licensing of
insurance companies; premiums and loss rates;
dividend restrictions; types of insurance that may be
sold; permissible investments; policy reserve
requirements; and insurance marketing practices.
Certain US source payments to foreign persons
may be subject to US withholding tax unless the
foreign person is a ‘qualified intermediary’. A
qualified intermediary is a financial intermediary
which is qualified under the US Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and has completed the Qualified
197
Intermediary Withholding Agreement with the
Internal Revenue Service. Various HSBC operations
outside the US are qualified intermediaries.
Risk management
(Unaudited)
Introduction
All HSBC’s activities involve the measurement,
evaluation, acceptance and management of some
degree of risk, or combination of risks. The most
important risk categories that the Group is exposed
to are credit risk (including cross-border country
risk), insurance risk, liquidity risk, market risk
(including foreign exchange, interest rate and equity
price risks), operational risks in various forms,
pension risk, residual value risk, reputational risk
and sustainability (environmental and social) risks.
The management of these various risk
categories is discussed below. Given the distinct
characteristics of the insurance business, the
management of its credit, liquidity and market risks
is described alongside insurance risk in the section
‘Risk management of insurance operations’.
The risk management framework established by
the Group seeks to foster the continuous monitoring
of the risk environment and an integrated evaluation
of risks and their interdependencies.
Risk governance and ownership
A well-established risk governance and ownership
structure ensures oversight of, and accountability for,
the effective management of risk at Group, regional,
customer group and operating entity levels.
The Board of Directors of HSBC Holdings
approves plans and performance targets for the Group
and its principal subsidiaries, the appointment of
senior officers, the delegation of authorities for credit
and other risks and the establishment of effective
control procedures. Under authority delegated by the
Board of Directors, Group Management Board
(‘GMB’) formulates high-level Group risk
management policy.
A separately convened Risk Management
Meeting (‘RMM’) of GMB has the responsibility for
exercising and delegating risk approval authorities,
setting risk appetite and approving definitive risk
policies and controls. It monitors all categories of
risk, receives reports, determines action to be taken
and reviews the efficacy of HSBC’s risk management
framework.
GMB and RMM are supported by a dedicated
Group Risk function headed by the Group Chief Risk
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Credit risk management
Officer (‘GCRO’), who is a member of both GMB
and RMM and reports to the Group Finance Director
within an integrated Finance and Risk function.
Similar structures involving the creation of local Chief
Risk Officers are being extended to all major Group
subsidiaries and customer groups during 2008. The
Group Finance Director represents Finance and Risk
on the HSBC Holdings Board.
Primary responsibility for managing risk at
operating entity level lies with the respective boards
and Chief Executive Officers, as custodians of the
relevant balance sheets. In turn, Group Risk has
functional responsibility for the principal financial risk
types, namely: retail and wholesale credit, market,
operational and security/fraud risks. Within this
structure, it establishes Group policy, exercises
Group-wide oversight and provides reporting and
analysis of portfolio composition on a global and a
regional basis to senior management. Group Risk
co-ordinates the further development of the risk
appetite, economic capital and stress-testing
frameworks. In addition, the GCRO is a member of
the Group Portfolio Oversight Committee, chaired by
the Group Treasurer, which governs the Group’s
portfolio management activities for the wholesale
business sector.
HSBC’s risk management policies, encapsulated
in the Group Standards Manual and cascaded in a
hierarchy of policy manuals throughout the Group, are
designed to support the formulation of risk appetite,
guide employees and establish procedures for
monitoring and controlling risks, with timely and
reliable reporting to management. HSBC regularly
reviews and updates its risk management policies and
systems to reflect changes in markets, products and
emerging best practice.
It is the responsibility of all Group officers to
identify, assess and manage risk within the scope of
their assigned responsibilities. Personal
accountability, reinforced by the Group’s governance
structure and instilled by training, helps to foster
throughout the Group a disciplined and constructive
culture of risk management and control.
Credit risk
Credit risk management
(Audited)
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss if a customer
or counterparty fails to meet an obligation under a
contract. It arises principally from direct lending,
trade finance and leasing business, but also from
certain off-balance sheet products such as guarantees
and credit derivatives, and from the Group’s
holdings of assets in the form of debt securities.
198
HSBC has standards, policies and procedures
dedicated to monitoring and managing risk from
such activities.
Within Head Office, the Group Risk function
provides high-level centralised oversight and
management of credit risk for HSBC worldwide. Its
responsibilities include:
• Formulating Group credit policy. Compliance,
subject to approved dispensations, is mandatory
for all HSBC’s operating companies, which
must formulate and record in local instruction
manuals their detailed credit policies and
procedures, consistent with Group policy.
• Guiding HSBC’s operating companies on the
Group’s appetite for, and attitude to, credit risk
exposure to specified market sectors, activities
and banking products. Group Risk controls
exposures to certain higher-risk sectors and
closely monitors exposure to others, including:
real estate, the automotive sector, certain non-
bank financial institutions, structured products
and leveraged finance transactions. When
necessary, restrictions are imposed on new
business or exposures, which may be capped at
Group and/or entity level.
• Undertaking independent review and objective
assessment of risk. Group Risk assesses all
commercial non-bank credit facilities and
exposures – including those embedded in
derivatives – that are originated or renewed by
HSBC’s operating companies over designated
limits, prior to the facilities being committed to
customers or transactions being undertaken.
Operating companies may not confirm credit
approval without this concurrence.
• Monitoring the performance and management of
retail portfolios across the Group. Group Risk
tracks emerging trends, overseeing the effective
management of any adverse characteristics.
• Controlling centrally exposures to sovereign
entities, banks and other financial institutions.
HSBC’s credit and settlement risk limits to
counterparties in these sectors are approved and
managed by Group Risk to optimise the use of
credit availability and avoid excessive risk
concentration.
• Establishing and managing exposures to debt
securities by establishing controls in respect of
securities held for trading purposes and setting
issuer limits for securities not held for trading.
• Establishing and maintaining HSBC’s policy on
large credit exposures, ensuring that
concentrations of exposure by counterparty,
sector or geography do not become excessive in
relation to the Group’s capital base and remain
within internal and regulatory limits. The
approach is designed to be more conservative
than internationally accepted regulatory
standards. Group Risk also monitors HSBC’s
intra-Group exposures to ensure they are
maintained within regulatory limits. Plans
are well developed to adopt the FSA’s new
‘Integrated Groups’ regime in accordance with
the agreed transition timetable.
• Controlling cross-border exposures, through the
imposition of country limits with sub-limits by
maturity and type of business. Country limits
are determined by taking into account economic
and political factors, and applying local business
knowledge. Transactions with countries deemed
to be higher risk are considered on a case by
case basis.
• Maintaining and developing HSBC’s risk rating
framework and systems, to classify exposures
meaningfully and enable focused management
of the risks involved. The GCRO chairs the
Credit Risk Analytics Oversight Committee,
which reports to the RMM and oversees risk
rating model governance for both wholesale and
retail business. Rating methodologies are based
upon a wide range of analytics and market data-
based tools, which are core inputs to the
assessment of customer risk. For larger
facilities, while full use is made of automated
risk rating processes, the ultimate responsibility
for setting risk ratings rests with the final
approving executive. Details of HSBC’s
approach under Basel II to capital management
and allocation in relation to risk may be found
on page 284.
• Reporting on aspects of the HSBC credit risk
portfolio to the RMM, the Group Audit
Committee and the Board of Directors of HSBC
Holdings by way of a variety of regular and
ad hoc reports covering:
–
–
–
–
–
risk concentrations;
retail portfolio performance at Group entity,
regional and overall Group levels;
specific higher-risk portfolio segments;
individual large impaired accounts, and
impairment allowances/charges for all
customer segments;
country limits, cross-border exposures and
related impairment allowances;
199
–
portfolio and analytical model performance
data; and
–
stress-testing results and recommendations.
• Managing and directing credit risk management
systems initiatives. HSBC has constructed a
centralised database covering substantially all
the Group’s direct lending exposures, to deliver
an increasingly granular level of management
reporting. An electronic credit application
process for banks is operational throughout the
Group and a similar corporate credit application
system covers almost all Group corporate
business by value.
• Providing advice and guidance to HSBC’s
operating companies, to promote best practice
throughout the Group on credit-related matters
such as sustainability risk, new products and
training.
• Acting on behalf of HSBC Holdings as the
primary interface, for credit-related issues, with
external parties including the Bank of England,
the FSA, rating agencies, corporate analysts,
trade associations and counterparts in the
world’s major banks and non-bank financial
institutions.
Each HSBC operating company is required to
implement credit policies, procedures and lending
guidelines that conform to Group standards, with
credit approval authorities delegated from the Board
of Directors of HSBC Holdings to the relevant Chief
Executive Officer. In each major subsidiary, a Chief
Risk Officer or Chief Credit Officer reports to the
local Chief Executive Officer or Chief Operating
Officer on credit-related issues, maintaining a strong
functional reporting line to the GCRO.
Each operating company is responsible for the
quality and performance of its credit portfolios and
for monitoring and controlling all credit risks in its
portfolios, including those subject to central
approval by Group Risk. This includes managing its
own risk concentrations by market sector, geography
and product. Local systems are in place throughout
the Group to enable operating companies to control
and monitor exposures by customer and retail
product segments.
Special attention is paid to problem exposures,
which are subject to more frequent and intensive
review and reporting, in order to accelerate remedial
action. Where appropriate, HSBC’s local operating
companies maintain or establish specialist units to
provide customers with support in order to help them
avoid default wherever possible.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Credit risk management
•
in the financial sector, charges over financial
instruments such as debt securities and equities
in support of trading facilities.
In addition, credit derivatives, including credit
default swaps and structured credit notes, as well as
securitisation structures, are used to manage credit
risk in the Group’s loan portfolio.
HSBC does not disclose the fair value of
collateral held as security or other credit
enhancements on loans and advances past due but
not impaired, or on individually assessed impaired
loans and advances, as it is not practicable to do so.
Other financial assets
Collateral held as security for financial assets other
than loans and advances is determined by the nature
of the instrument. Debt securities, treasury and other
eligible bills are generally unsecured, with the
exception of asset-backed securities and similar
instruments, which are secured by pools of financial
assets.
The ISDA Master Agreement is HSBC’s
preferred agreement for documenting derivatives
activity. It provides the contractual framework
within which dealing activity across a full range of
over-the-counter products is conducted, and
contractually binds both parties to apply close-out
netting across all outstanding transactions covered
by an agreement if either party defaults or other
pre-agreed termination events occur. It is common,
and HSBC’s preferred, practice for the parties to
execute a Credit Support Annex (‘CSA’) in
conjunction with the ISDA Master Agreement.
Under a CSA, collateral is passed between the
parties to mitigate the market-contingent
counterparty risk inherent in the outstanding
positions.
Settlement risk arises in any situation where a
payment in cash, securities or equities is made in the
expectation of a corresponding receipt in cash,
securities or equities. Daily settlement limits are
established for each counterparty to cover the
aggregate of all settlement risk arising from HSBC’s
transactions with them, on any single day. Settlement
risk on many transactions, particularly those
involving securities and equities, is substantially
mitigated through being effected via assured
payment systems, or on a delivery-versus-payment
basis.
Periodic risk-based audits of operating
companies’ credit processes and portfolios are
undertaken by HSBC’s Internal Audit function.
Audits include consideration of the adequacy and
clarity of credit policy/procedure manuals; an
in-depth analysis of a representative sample of
accounts; an overview of homogeneous portfolios
of similar assets to assess the quality of the loan
book and other exposures; consideration of any
oversight or review work performed by credit risk
management functions and the adequacy of
impairment calculations; a review of analytical
model governance and implementation; a review of
management objectives and a check that Group and
local standards and policies are adhered to in the
approval and management of credit facilities.
Individually significant accounts are reviewed
on a sample basis to ensure that risk ratings are
appropriate, that credit and collection procedures
have been properly followed and that, when an
account or portfolio evidences deterioration,
impairment allowances are raised in accordance with
the Group’s established processes. Internal Audit
discusses with management risk ratings it considers
to be inappropriate; after discussion, its final
recommendations for revised ratings must then
be adopted.
Collateral and other credit enhancements
(Audited)
Loans and advances
It is HSBC’s policy, when lending, to do so within
the customer’s capacity to repay, rather than rely
excessively on security. Depending on the
customer’s standing and the type of product,
facilities may be unsecured. Nevertheless, collateral
can be an important mitigant of credit risk.
Operating companies are required to implement
appropriate guidelines on the acceptability of
specific classes of collateral or credit risk mitigation,
and determine suitable valuation parameters. Such
parameters, structures and legal covenants are
required to be subject to regular review to ensure
that they are supported by empirical evidence and
continue to fulfil their intended purpose. The
principal collateral types are as follows:
•
•
•
in the personal sector, mortgages over
residential properties;
in the commercial and industrial sector, charges
over business assets such as premises, stock and
debtors;
in the commercial real estate sector, charges
over the properties being financed; and
200
Credit quality of loans and advances
(Audited)
HSBC’s credit risk rating systems and processes
differentiate exposures in order to highlight those
with greater risk factors and higher potential severity
of loss. For individually significant accounts, risk
ratings are reviewed regularly and amendments,
where necessary, are implemented promptly. Within
the Group’s retail portfolios, risk is assessed and
managed using a wide range of risk and pricing
models.
For many years, HSBC has deployed a seven-
grade rating system based on a ‘composite’
assessment of the likelihood and extent of
delinquency and risk mitigation (for details,
see page 224).
This legacy risk rating scale is being superseded
by a more sophisticated and granular methodology,
based on probability of default and loss estimates,
compliant with an internal ratings-based (‘IRB’)
approach required to support the Basel II framework
for calculating the Group’s minimum capital
requirement. The integration of this framework into
reporting structures will enable Board and regulatory
reporting on the new basis in accordance with the
Group’s IRB obligations. The new framework is
well embedded in the Group’s principal operating
entities.
Impairment assessment
(Audited)
When impairment losses occur, HSBC reduces the
carrying amount of loans and advances and held-to-
maturity financial investments through the use of an
allowance account. When impairment of available-
for-sale financial assets occurs, the carrying amount
of the asset is reduced directly.
Two types of impairment allowance are in place:
individually assessed and collectively assessed, as
discussed below.
Impairment allowances may be assessed and
created either for individually significant accounts
or, on a collective basis, for groups of individually
significant accounts for which no evidence of
impairment has been individually identified or for
high-volume groups of homogeneous loans that are
not considered individually significant.
It is HSBC’s policy that each operating
company creates allowances for impaired loans
promptly and on a consistent basis.
Management regularly evaluates the adequacy
of the established allowances for impaired loans by
conducting a detailed review of the loan portfolio,
201
comparing performance and delinquency statistics
with historical trends and assessing the impact of
current economic conditions.
Individually assessed impairment allowances
These are determined by evaluating exposure to loss,
case by case, on all individually significant accounts
and all other accounts that do not qualify for the
collective assessment approach outlined below.
Loans are treated as impaired as soon as there is
objective evidence that an impairment loss has been
incurred. The criteria used by HSBC to determine
that there is such objective evidence include,
inter alia:
•
•
•
•
•
known cash flow difficulties experienced by the
borrower;
past due contractual payments of either principal
or interest;
breach of loan covenants or conditions;
the probability that the borrower will enter
bankruptcy or other financial realisation; and
a significant downgrading in credit rating by an
external credit rating agency.
In determining the level of allowances on such
accounts, the following factors are typically
considered:
• HSBC’s aggregate exposure to the customer;
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the viability of the customer’s business model
and their capacity to trade successfully out of
financial difficulties, generating sufficient cash
flow to service debt obligations;
the ability of the borrower to obtain, and make
payments in, the currency of the loan if not
denominated in local currency;
the amount and timing of expected receipts and
recoveries;
the extent of other creditors’ commitments
ranking ahead of, or pari passu with, HSBC and
the likelihood of other creditors continuing to
support the company;
the complexity of determining the aggregate
amount and ranking of all creditor claims and
the extent to which legal and insurance
uncertainties are evident;
the value of security and likelihood of
successfully realising it;
the existence of other credit mitigants and the
ability of the providers of such credit mitigants
to deliver as contractually committed; and
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Credit risk management / Exposure
• when available, the secondary market price of
the debt.
The level of impairment allowances on
individually significant accounts that are above
defined materiality thresholds is reviewed at least
semi-annually, and more regularly when
circumstances require. This normally encompasses
re-assessment of the enforceability of any collateral
held and of actual and anticipated receipts. For
significant commercial and corporate debts,
specialised loan ‘work-out’ teams with experience in
insolvency and specific market sectors are used to
manage the lending and assess likely losses.
Individually assessed impairment allowances
are only released when there is reasonable and
objective evidence of a reduction in the established
loss estimate.
Collectively assessed impairment allowances
Impairment is assessed on a collective basis in two
circumstances:
•
•
to cover losses that have been incurred but have
not yet been identified on loans subject to
individual assessment; and
for homogeneous groups of loans that are not
considered individually significant.
Incurred but not yet identified impairment
Individually assessed loans for which no evidence of
impairment has been specifically identified on an
individual basis are grouped together according to
their credit risk characteristics. A collective
impairment allowance is calculated to reflect
impairment losses incurred at the balance sheet date
which will only be individually identified in the
future.
The collective impairment allowance is
determined having taken into account:
•
•
historical loss experience in portfolios of similar
credit risk characteristics (for example, by
industry sector, risk rating or product segment);
the estimated period between impairment
occurring and the loss being identified and
evidenced by the establishment of an
appropriate allowance against the individual
loan; and
• management’s experienced judgement as to
whether current economic and credit conditions
are such that the actual level of inherent losses is
likely to be greater or less than that suggested by
historical experience.
202
The period between a loss occurring and its
identification is estimated by local management for
each identified portfolio. In general, the periods used
vary between four and twelve months although, in
exceptional cases, longer periods are warranted.
The basis on which impairment allowances for
incurred but not yet identified losses is established in
each reporting entity is documented and reviewed by
senior Finance and Credit Risk management to
ensure conformity with Group policy.
Homogeneous groups of loans
Two methodologies are used to calculate impairment
allowances where large numbers of relatively low-
value assets are managed using a portfolio approach,
typically:
•
•
•
low-value, homogeneous small business
accounts in certain countries or territories;
residential mortgages that have not been
individually assessed;
credit cards and other unsecured consumer
lending products; and
• motor vehicle financing.
When appropriate empirical information is
available, the Group uses roll rate methodology. This
employs a statistical analysis of historical trends of
default and the amount of consequential loss, based
on the delinquency of accounts within a portfolio of
homogeneous accounts. Other historical data and
current economic conditions are also evaluated when
calculating the appropriate level of impairment
allowance required to cover inherent loss. In certain
highly developed markets, models also take into
account behavioural and account management trends
revealed in, for example, bankruptcy and
rescheduling statistics.
When the portfolio size is small, or when
information is insufficient or not reliable enough to
adopt a roll rate methodology, a formulaic approach
is used that allocates progressively higher percentage
loss rates the longer a customer’s loan is overdue.
Loss rates reflect the discounted expected future
cash flows for a portfolio.
Generally, historical experience is the most
objective and relevant information from which to
begin to assess inherent loss within each portfolio. In
circumstances where historical loss experience
provides less relevant information about the inherent
loss in a given portfolio at the balance sheet date –
for example, where there have been changes in
economic conditions or regulations – management
considers the more recent trends in the portfolio risk
factors which may not be adequately reflected in its
statistical models and, subject to guidance from
Group Finance and Group Risk, adjusts impairment
allowances accordingly.
Roll rates, loss rates and the expected timing of
future recoveries are regularly benchmarked against
actual outcomes to ensure they remain appropriate.
Write-off of loans and advances
Loans are normally written off, either partially or in
full, when there is no realistic prospect of further
recovery. Where loans are secured, this is generally
after receipt of any proceeds from the realisation of
security.
In the case of residential mortgages and second
lien loans in HSBC Finance, loan carrying amounts
in excess of net realisable value are written off at or
before the time foreclosure is completed or when
settlement is reached with the borrower. If
foreclosure is not pursued, and there is no reasonable
expectation of recovery, the loan is normally written
off no later than the end of the month in which the
loan becomes 240 days contractually past due.
Unsecured personal facilities, including credit
cards, are generally written off at between 150 and
210 days past due, the standard period being the end
of the month in which the account becomes 180 days
contractually delinquent. This period may be
extended, generally to 300 days past due but in no
event exceeding 360 days past due, in the case of a
small proportion of HSBC Finance’s cards business
and unsecured personal facilities other than credit
cards.
Cases of write-off periods exceeding 360 days
past due are few but arise, for example, in a few
countries where local regulation or legislation
constrain earlier write-off, or where the realisation of
collateral for secured real estate lending takes place
at this time.
In the event of bankruptcy or analogous
proceedings, write-off can occur earlier than at the
periods stated above. Collections procedures may
continue after write-off.
Cross-border exposures
Management assesses the vulnerability of countries
to foreign currency payment restrictions when
considering impairment allowances on cross-border
exposures. This assessment includes an analysis of
the economic and political factors existing at the
time. Economic factors include the level of external
indebtedness, the debt service burden and access to
external sources of funds to meet the debtor
203
country’s financing requirements. Political factors
taken into account include the stability of the country
and its government, threats to security, and the
quality and independence of the legal system.
Impairment allowances are assessed in respect
of all qualifying exposures within these countries
unless these exposures and the inherent risks are:
•
performing, trade-related and of less than one
year’s maturity;
• mitigated by acceptable security cover which is,
other than in exceptional cases, held outside the
country concerned;
•
•
•
in the form of securities held for trading
purposes for which a liquid and active market
exists, and which are measured at fair value
daily;
performing facilities with principal (excluding
security) of US$1 million or below; or
performing facilities with maturity dates shorter
than three months.
Credit exposure
Maximum exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
HSBC’s exposure to credit risk is spread over
several asset classes, including trading assets, loans
to customers, loans to banks and financial
investments. Recently, loss experience has mainly
affected personal lending portfolios. Thus, in 2007,
94 per cent of loan impairment charges arose in
Personal Financial Services, broadly in line with
2006.
The deterioration of credit conditions in the
US mortgage market was the most significant factor
affecting HSBC’s exposure to credit risk during
2007. A full discussion of this issue can be found
in the commentary on Areas of Special Interest on
page 216.
The following table presents the maximum
exposure to credit risk of balance sheet and off-
balance sheet financial instruments, before taking
account of any collateral held or other credit
enhancements unless such credit enhancements meet
offsetting requirements as set out in Note 2m on the
Financial Statements. For financial assets recognised
on the balance sheet, the exposure to credit risk
equals their carrying amount. For financial
guarantees granted, the maximum exposure to credit
risk is the maximum amount that HSBC would have
to pay if the guarantees were called upon. For loan
commitments and other credit-related commitments
that are irrevocable over the life of the respective
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Exposure
facilities, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the
full amount of the committed facilities.
Note 18 on the Financial Statements gives more
information on credit risk exposure to derivatives
counterparties.
Maximum exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
Maximum exposure
Items in course of collection from other banks .................................................................................
Trading assets ....................................................................................................................................
Treasury and other eligible bills ....................................................................................................
Debt securities ................................................................................................................................
Loans and advances .......................................................................................................................
Financial assets designated at fair value ...........................................................................................
Treasury and other eligible bills ....................................................................................................
Debt securities ................................................................................................................................
Loans and advances .......................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
9,777
394,492
16,439
178,834
199,219
21,517
181
21,150
186
Derivatives .........................................................................................................................................
187,854
Loans and advances held at amortised cost .......................................................................................
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................................................
Loans and advances to customers .................................................................................................
Financial investments ........................................................................................................................
Treasury and other eligible bills ....................................................................................................
Debt securities ................................................................................................................................
Other assets ........................................................................................................................................
Endorsements and acceptances .....................................................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................................................................
Financial guarantees ..........................................................................................................................
Loan commitments and other credit-related commitments1 .............................................................
1,218,914
237,366
981,548
270,406
30,104
240,302
25,291
12,248
13,043
56,440
764,457
2006
US$m
14,144
300,998
21,759
155,447
123,792
9,971
133
9,449
389
103,702
1,053,338
185,205
868,133
196,509
25,313
171,196
22,846
9,577
13,269
62,014
714,630
At 31 December .................................................................................................................................
2,949,148
2,478,152
1 The amount of the loan commitments reflects, where relevant, the expected level of take-up of pre-approved loan offers made by
mailshots to personal customers. In addition to those amounts, there is a further maximum possible exposure to credit risk of
US$317,834 million (2006: US$464,984 million), reflecting the full take-up of such irrevocable loan commitments. The take-up
of such offers is generally at modest levels.
Concentration of exposure
(Audited)
Concentrations of credit risk exist when a number of
counterparties are engaged in similar activities, or
operate in the same geographical areas or industry
sectors and have comparable economic
characteristics, so that their ability to meet
contractual obligations is uniformly affected by
changes in economic, political or other conditions.
Loans and advances
(Unaudited)
Loans and advances were well diversified across
industry sectors and jurisdictions.
At constant exchange rates, gross loans and
advances to customers (excluding the financial
sector and settlement accounts) grew by
US$55 billion or 7 per cent during 2007. On the
same basis, personal lending comprised 56 per cent
of HSBC’s loan portfolio and 23 per cent of the
growth in loans in 2007.
Including the financial sector and settlement
accounts, personal lending represented
US$501 billion, or 50 per cent, of total loans
and advances to customers at 31 December 2007.
Within this total, residential mortgages were
US$269 billion and, at 27 per cent of total advances
to customers, comprised the Group’s largest single
sectoral concentration.
Corporate, commercial and financial lending,
including settlement accounts, amounted to 50 per
cent of gross lending to customers at 31 December
2007. The largest industry concentrations were in
non-bank financial institutions and commercial real
estate lending at 10 per cent and 7 per cent,
respectively, of total gross lending to customers.
204
Lending to non-bank financial institutions
principally comprises secured lending on trading
accounts, primarily repo facilities.
Commercial, industrial and international
trade lending grew strongly in 2007, rising by a
percentage point to 20 per cent of total gross loans
and advances to customers. Within this category, the
largest concentration of lending was to the service
sector, which amounted to 6 per cent of total gross
lending to customers.
Advances to banks primarily represent amounts
owing on trading account and HSBC’s placing of its
own liquidity on short-term deposit. Such lending
was widely distributed across major institutions,
with no single exposure exceeding 5 per cent of total
advances to banks.
Financial investments
(Unaudited)
At US$270 billion, total financial investments,
excluding equity securities, were 38 per cent higher
at 31 December 2007 than at the end of 2006. Debt
securities, at US$240 billion, represented the largest
concentration of financial investments at 89 per cent
of the total, compared with US$171 billion (87 per
cent) at 31 December 2006. HSBC’s holdings of
corporate debt, asset-backed securities and other
securities were spread across a wide range of issuers
and geographical regions, with 50 per cent invested
in securities issued by banks and other financial
institutions. The principal movement in financial
investments in 2007 represented the consolidation of
HSBC-sponsored SIVs together with certain debt
securities purchased from the Group’s money market
funds as noted on page 186.
Investments in governments and government
agencies of US$92 billion were 33 per cent of
overall financial investments, 5 percentage points
lower than in 2006. US$30 billion of these
investments comprised treasury and other eligible
bills.
A more detailed analysis of financial
investments is set out in Note 19 on the Financial
Statements and an analysis by Rating Agency
designation is provided on page 215.
The insurance businesses held diversified
portfolios of debt and equity securities designated
at fair value (2007: US$34 billion; 2006:
US$18 billion) and debt securities classified as
financial investments (2007: US$23 billion; 2006:
US$10 billion). The increase was due to the
acquisition of HSBC’s partner’s share in HSBC
Assurances.
A more detailed analysis of securities held by
the insurance businesses is set out on page 276.
Securities held for trading
(Unaudited)
Total securities held for trading within trading assets
were US$247 billion at 31 December 2007 (2006:
US$204 billion). The largest concentration of these
assets was government and government agency
securities, which amounted to US$115 billion, or
46 per cent of overall trading securities (2006:
US$94 billion, 46 per cent). This included
US$16 billion (2006: US$22 billion) of treasury and
other eligible bills. Corporate debt and other
securities were US$60 billion or 24 per cent of
overall trading securities, 9 percentage points lower
than 2006’s level of 33 per cent at US$67 billion.
Included within total securities held for trading were
US$70 billion (2006: US$36 billion) of debt
securities issued by banks and other financial
institutions.
A more detailed analysis of securities held for
trading is set out in Note 16 on the Financial
Statements and an analysis by Rating Agency
designation is provided on page 215.
Financial assets – net exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
In respect of certain financial assets, HSBC has
legally enforceable rights to offset them with
financial liabilities. In normal circumstances,
however, there would be no intention of settling net,
or of realising the financial assets and settling the
financial liabilities simultaneously. Consequently,
the financial assets are not offset against the
respective financial liabilities for financial reporting
purposes. However, the exposure to credit risk
relating to the respective financial assets is mitigated
as follows:
205
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Exposure > 2007
Financial assets – net exposure to credit risk
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
394,492
16,439
178,834
100,440
98,779
21,517
181
21,150
178
8
Net
exposure to
credit risk1
US$m
Carrying
amount
US$m
382,272
16,439
177,417
99,446
88,970
21,517
181
21,150
178
8
300,998
21,759
155,447
52,006
71,786
9,971
133
9,449
236
153
Offset
US$m
(12,220)
–
(1,417)
(994)
(9,809)
–
–
–
–
–
Net
exposure to
credit risk1
US$m
292,760
21,743
154,411
52,006
64,600
9,971
133
9,449
236
153
Offset
US$m
(8,238)
(16)
(1,036)
–
(7,186)
–
–
–
–
–
Trading assets .....................................................
Treasury and other eligible bills .....................
Debt securities ................................................
Loans and advances to banks .........................
Loans and advances to customers ..................
Financial assets designated at fair value ............
Treasury and other eligible bills .....................
Debt securities ................................................
Loans and advances to banks .........................
Loans and advances to customers ..................
Derivatives ..........................................................
187,854
(121,709)
66,145
103,702
(62,741)
40,961
Loans and advances held at amortised cost ........
Loans and advances to banks .........................
Loans and advances to customers ..................
1,218,914
237,366
981,548
(66,983)
(278)
(66,705)
1,151,931
237,088
914,843
1,053,338
185,205
868,133
(68,531)
(455)
(68,076)
Financial investments .........................................
Treasury and other similar bills ......................
Debt securities ................................................
270,406
30,104
240,302
–
–
–
270,406
30,104
240,302
196,509
25,313
171,196
(31)
(30)
(1)
984,807
184,750
800,057
196,478
25,283
171,195
Other assets
Endorsements and acceptances ......................
12,248
(226)
12,022
9,577
(187)
9,390
2,105,431
(201,138)
1,904,293
1,674,095
(139,728)
1,534,367
1 Excluding the value of any collateral held or other credit enhancements.
Gross loans and advances by industry sector
(Unaudited)
At
31 December
2006
US$m
Constant
currency
effect
US$m
Movement on a
constant
currency basis
US$m
At
31 December
2007
US$m
Loans and advances to customers
Personal .........................................................................
Residential mortgages1 .............................................
Other personal2 .........................................................
Corporate and commercial ...........................................
Commercial, industrial and international trade.........
Commercial real estate .............................................
Other property-related ..............................................
Government ..............................................................
Other commercial3 ....................................................
Financial .......................................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ................................
Settlement accounts ..................................................
Total loans and advances to customers ........................
Loans and advances to banks ....................................
476,146
265,337
210,809
343,107
162,109
60,366
27,165
8,990
84,477
62,458
59,204
3,254
881,711
185,212
Total gross loans and advances ....................................
1,066,923
11,991
6,472
5,519
15,088
7,009
2,966
1,321
128
3,664
2,406
2,310
96
29,485
8,064
37,549
12,697
(2,741)
15,438
42,576
32,920
9,013
5,421
(3,410)
(1,368)
34,284
35,267
(983)
89,557
44,097
500,834
269,068
231,766
400,771
202,038
72,345
33,907
5,708
86,773
99,148
96,781
2,367
1,000,753
237,373
133,654
1,238,126
Including Hong Kong Government Home Ownership Scheme loans of US$3,942 million at 31 December 2007.
1
2 Other personal loans and advances include second lien mortgages and other property-related lending.
3 Other commercial loans and advances include advances in respect of agriculture, transport, energy and utilities.
206
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
(Unaudited)
The following commentary analyses, on a constant
currency basis, the changes in lending noted in
the table above compared with the position at
31 December 2006. Loans and advances to personal,
corporate and commercial customers rose by 7 per
cent, and total gross loans and advances grew by
12 per cent. There was a marked change in the
distribution of net new lending in 2007 with personal
lending growing significantly slower than corporate
and commercial lending, primarily as a consequence
of curtailing loan growth in US consumer finance.
Total lending to personal customers remained
predominantly in North America (2007:
US$231 billion; 2006: US$232 billion), the UK
(2007: US$128 billion; 2006: US$131 billion)
and Hong Kong (2007: US$43 billion; 2006:
US$39 billion). These three regions comprised
80 per cent of total personal lending, a decline of
3 percentage points since 31 December 2006.
Residential mortgages fell marginally to
US$269 billion at 31 December 2007, 27 per cent
(2006: 30 per cent) of total loans and advances to
customers (including the finance sector and
settlement accounts). A reduction in the US
mortgage loan portfolio was partly offset by
increases in Europe, Hong Kong, Rest of Asia-
Pacific and Latin America.
In Europe, residential mortgage balances rose by
1 per cent to US$96 billion. In France, mortgage
lending grew by 11 per cent to US$6 billion, despite
increasing competition, due to strong customer
demand. In Turkey, strong growth of 13 per cent was
driven by the expansion of the branch network.
Mortgage lending in the UK was flat, with risk
appetite restricted as margins on mortgage lending
fell. There was also a shift in the portfolio towards
fixed-rate mortgages.
In Hong Kong, residential mortgage balances
rose by 3 per cent as a result of a buoyant economy.
In North America, residential mortgage balances
decreased by 6 per cent. In the US, the level of
mortgage lending stood at US$99 billion, a decline
of 8 per cent since 31 December 2006. Balances in
the mortgage services business fell by 27 per cent as
the strategy to run down the book of business
originated through correspondents was put into
effect. The rundown was carried out through
repayments in the normal course of business, as well
as the sale of loans to third party investors and the
cessation of all remaining origination following the
closure of the wholesale activities of Decision One.
207
The write-off of impaired loans also contributed
to the decline in residential mortgage balances.
Balances elsewhere in the consumer lending
business increased by 9 per cent. In the fourth
quarter of 2007, management took a further series
of actions to limit originations in the branch-based
consumer lending business in respect of mortgage
lending, which resulted in fewer new loans in the
quarter and will markedly limit growth in this area
for the foreseeable future. In Canada, mortgage
balances rose by 7 per cent, driven by the buoyant
Canadian residential property market and continued
expansion of the branch network.
Mortgage lending balances rose by 10 per cent
in Rest of Asia-Pacific, with increases in the Middle
East and Singapore partly offset by the sale of the
New Zealand mortgage loan portfolio in July 2007.
In Latin America, balances increased by 18 per
cent, driven by rises of 23 per cent and 31 per cent in
Mexico and Brazil, respectively.
Other personal lending increased by 7 per
cent to US$232 billion at 31 December 2007,
representing 23 per cent of total loans and advances
to customers, including the financial sector and
settlement accounts (2006: 24 per cent).
In Europe, other personal lending rose by 4 per
cent to US$73 billion. Strong growth in lending to
Private Banking clients in Switzerland, (rising by
50 per cent), a 42 per cent rise in Turkey and a 7 per
cent rise in France were partly offset by a 7 per cent
decline in the UK as HSBC curtailed growth through
tightened underwriting criteria. Also in the UK,
HSBC disposed of part of its non-core credit card
portfolio, principally the Marbles brand, at the end
of 2007.
In Hong Kong, other personal lending rose by
29 per cent to US$13 billion as HSBC launched a
series of credit card campaigns that consolidated the
Group’s position as market leader. Other unsecured
lending rose by 46 per cent.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, other personal lending
increased by 19 per cent as branch expansion and
enhanced marketing activity led to higher loan
balances. Credit cards in circulation rose, with the
Middle East and India, in particular, producing
strong increases.
In North America, other personal lending
balances rose by 2 per cent. In the US, asset levels
remained broadly unchanged despite a significant
decline in second lien mortgage balances. Unsecured
personal lending in HSBC Finance fell, offset by a
rise at HSBC’s US retail bank and strong growth in
card balances from the momentum created by
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Exposure > 2007 / By industry sector
marketing initiatives in late 2006. In Canada, other
personal lending balances rose by 23 per cent, with
strong growth in both the consumer finance and
retail bank lending portfolios.
In Latin America, other personal lending
balances rose by 34 per cent to US$17 billion, due to
growth in credit cards and payroll loans. In Mexico,
where marketing campaigns added customers and
portfolio management programmes were put in place
to improve customer retention and card usage, the
strong growth in credit card balances drove a 41 per
cent rise in lending. In Brazil, other personal lending
balances increased by 28 per cent.
Loans and advances to corporate and
commercial customers increased by 12 per cent to
US$401 billion (2006: US$358 billion), with strong
growth in most regions.
In Europe, corporate and commercial advances
rose by 10 per cent. In the UK, asset balances rose
by 8 per cent as investment in direct sales channels
and the recruitment of sales staff led to increased
customer numbers. In France, lending balances
increased by 12 per cent as HSBC continued to
raise its brand profile.
In Hong Kong, HSBC achieved growth in
corporate commercial lending of 3 per cent, due to
increased demand for loans from manufacturers with
operations in mainland China, and for other intra-
Asian trading.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, the corporate and
commercial loan book increased by 29 per cent as
expanded operations helped to gain new business.
Strong growth was recorded in many countries,
including South Korea (42 per cent), India (34 per
cent) and mainland China (83 per cent). HSBC set
up new International Banking Centres, increased its
branch network and launched enhanced online
banking services throughout the region. In the
Middle East, new relationship managers were hired
in the UAE, and HSBC entered the small business
segment in Bahrain, Qatar and Jordan. In mainland
China, local incorporation helped increase lending as
the branch network expanded. HSBC was the first
international bank to set up a rural branch, targeting
businesses in the agricultural sector. In India, the
addition of new staff in the branch network helped
lift lending balances.
In North America, corporate and commercial
lending rose by 15 per cent, led by Canada, where
balances increased by 24 per cent. In the US, loan
growth in Commercial Banking resulted primarily
from strong activity in middle market lending,
despite a slowdown in commercial real estate
activity. 2007 saw an extension of middle market
activities in Chicago, Washington DC and the West
Coast as HSBC continued its branch expansion
programme. Global Banking and Markets funded
a number of facilities in connection with its
participation on leveraged and acquisition finance
syndicates, which added to loan balance growth in
the US. In Canada, lending balances rose against the
backdrop of strong economic growth, particularly in
Western Canada.
Corporate and commercial lending in Latin
America rose by 6 per cent as HSBC expanded its
network of International Banking Centres and
launched new initiatives to gain customers in the
small and micro-business segments. In Mexico,
volumes grew in commercial real estate lending,
trade and factoring. The loan portfolio in Brazil grew
strongly, led by increases in volumes in the giro facil
product, guaranteed account, rural loans and working
capital financing.
Loans and advances to the financial sector
rose by 53 per cent to US$99 billion. The increase
was primarily due to Europe, up 45 per cent, in line
with the strategy to expand the capital-efficient
client-driven reverse repo business. In North
America, lending to the financial sector rose by
65 per cent, due to substantial growth in balances
with securities brokers and other financial
institutions, as excess liquidity was invested in
reverse repos rather than Fed funds.
Loans and advances to banks increased by
23 per cent to US$237 billion. Lending to banks in
Hong Kong rose by 27 per cent and in Rest of Asia-
Pacific by 39 per cent, due to growth in customer
deposits across the region and increase in money
market placements. In Europe, lending to banks rose
by 28 per cent, due to project and money market
loans in the UK and reverse repo lending in France.
The following tables analyse loans by industry
sector and by the location of the principal operations
of the lending subsidiary or, in the case of the
operations of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation, HSBC Bank, HSBC Bank Middle East
and HSBC Bank USA, by the location of the lending
branch.
208
Loans and advances to banks by geographical region
Europe
US$m
104,534
76,837
44,369
56,063
51,806
Hong
Kong
US$m
63,737
50,359
42,751
45,710
38,639
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
39,861
27,517
19,559
14,890
12,948
At 31 December 2007 (audited) ..
At 31 December 2006 (audited) ..
At 31 December 2005 (audited) ..
At 31 December 2004 (unaudited)
At 31 December 2003 (unaudited)
Gross
loans and
advances
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
to banks
US$m
Impairment
allowances1
US$m
16,566
17,865
10,331
20,911
6,852
12,675
12,634
8,964
5,892
6,955
237,373
185,212
125,974
143,466
117,200
(7)
(7)
(9)
(17)
(24)
1 2003 and 2004: provisions for bad and doubtful debts.
Loans and advances to customers by industry sector and by geographical region
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
Europe
US$m
Personal
Residential mortgages1 ............
Other personal .........................
95,665
72,884
Hong
Kong
US$m
29,689
13,344
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
20,397
16,513
Gross
loans and
advances to
customers
Latin
America
US$m
US$m
Gross loans
by industry
sector as a
% of total
gross loans
%
North
America
US$m
118,993
111,569
4,324
17,456
269,068
231,766
Corporate and commercial
Commercial, industrial and
international trade ...............
Commercial real estate ............
Other property-related .............
Government .............................
Other commercial2 ...................
Financial
Non-bank financial
institutions ...........................
Settlement accounts .................
Total gross loans and advances
to customers3 ............................
Percentage of Group loans and
advances by geographical
region .......................................
168,549
43,033
36,910
230,562
21,780
500,834
120,359
36,672
11,275
2,299
54,677
17,740
12,301
8,168
332
5,175
36,461
7,592
4,664
1,667
10,058
13,937
14,561
8,000
248
12,152
13,541
1,219
1,800
1,162
4,711
202,038
72,345
33,907
5,708
86,773
225,282
43,716
60,442
48,898
22,433
400,771
61,216
1,159
62,375
2,483
782
3,265
5,191
235
5,426
22,252
128
22,380
5,639
63
96,781
2,367
5,702
99,148
456,206
90,014
102,778
301,840
49,915
1,000,753
100 .0
45.6%
9.0%
10.2%
30.2%
5.0%
100.0%
26.9
23.2
50.1
20.1
7.2
3.4
0.6
8.7
40.0
9.7
0.2
9.9
Impaired loans .............................
6,254
433
1,088
8,384
2,145
18,304
Impaired loans as a percentage of
gross loans and advances to
customers .................................
Impairment allowances on
1.4%
0.5%
1.1%
2.8%
4.3%
1.8%
impaired loans .........................
3,049
144
552
7,176
1,366
12,287
Impairment allowances on
impaired loans as a percentage
of impaired loans .....................
48.8%
33.3%
50.7%
85.6%
63.7%
67.1%
1 Includes Hong Kong Government Home Ownership Scheme loans of US$3,942 million.
2 Other commercial loans and advances include advances in respect of agriculture, transport, energy and utilities.
3 Included within this total is credit card lending of US$82,854 million.
209
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Exposure > By industry sector
Loans and advances to customers by industry sector and by geographical region (continued)
(Audited)
At 31 December 2006
Europe
US$m
Personal
Residential mortgages1 ............
Other personal .........................
91,534
67,214
Hong
Kong
US$m
28,743
10,396
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
17,478
13,275
North
America
US$m
123,955
108,256
Gross
loans and
advances to
customers
Latin
America
US$m
US$m
Gross loans
by industry
sector as a
% of total
gross loans
%
3,627
11,668
265,337
210,809
158,748
39,139
30,753
232,211
15,295
476,146
99,027
28,655
9,616
2,360
56,650
16,845
12,481
6,923
551
5,553
25,196
5,502
3,491
1,916
8,468
11,004
12,782
5,931
220
9,736
10,037
946
1,204
3,943
4,070
162,109
60,366
27,165
8,990
84,477
196,308
42,353
44,573
39,673
20,200
343,107
40,055
1,064
41,119
2,332
823
3,155
2,926
223
3,149
12,258
1,092
13,350
1,633
52
59,204
3,254
1,685
62,458
396,175
84,647
78,475
285,234
37,180
881,711
100.0
30.1
23.9
54.0
18.4
6.8
3.1
1.0
9.6
38.9
6.7
0.4
7.1
Corporate and commercial
Commercial, industrial and
international trade ...............
Commercial real estate ............
Other property-related .............
Government .............................
Other commercial2 ...................
Financial
Non-bank financial
institutions ...........................
Settlement accounts .................
Total gross loans and advances
to customers3 ............................
Percentage of Group loans and
advances by geographical
region .......................................
Impaired loans .............................
5,847
44.9%
9.6%
454
8.9%
1,184
32.4%
4,822
4.2%
100.0%
1,478
13,785
Impaired loans as a percentage of
gross loans and advances to
customers .................................
Impairment allowances on
impaired loans and advances4 .
Impairment allowances on
impaired loans as a percentage
of impaired loans4 ....................
1.5%
0.5%
1.5%
1.7%
4.0%
1.6%
2,934
148
590
3,825
1,025
8,522
50.2%
32.6%
49.8%
79.3%
69.4%
61.8%
1 Includes Hong Kong Government Home Ownership Scheme loans of US$4,078 million.
2 Other commercial loans and advances include advances in respect of agriculture, transport, energy and utilities.
3 Includes credit card lending of US$74,518 million.
4 Disclosures previously made in respect of 2006 have been amended to comply with 2007’s presentation by excluding collective
impairment allowances on loans and advances not classified as impaired. See page 226.
210
(Audited)
At 31 December 2005
Europe
US$m
Personal
Residential mortgages1 ............
Other personal .........................
73,923
55,672
Hong
Kong
US$m
28,492
9,978
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
17,641
11,178
North
America
US$m
116,448
97,663
Gross
loans and
advances to
customers
Latin
America
US$m
US$m
Gross loans
by industry
sector as a
% of total
gross loans
%
2,042
7,439
238,546
181,930
129,595
38,470
28,819
214,111
9,481
420,476
76,687
22,071
7,603
1,821
41,944
16,736
12,557
6,147
303
6,922
21,286
5,081
3,426
2,147
7,716
10,375
11,714
4,447
192
7,189
5,718
392
573
3,755
1,907
130,802
51,815
22,196
8,218
65,678
150,126
42,665
39,656
33,917
12,345
278,709
35,305
1,002
36,307
1,966
505
2,471
2,202
175
2,377
9,464
416
9,880
1,095
44
1,139
50,032
2,142
52,174
316,028
83,606
70,852
257,908
22,965
751,359
100.0
31.7
24.2
55.9
17.4
6.9
3.0
1.1
8.7
37.1
6.7
0.3
7.0
Corporate and commercial
Commercial, industrial and
international trade ...............
Commercial real estate ............
Other property-related .............
Government .............................
Other commercial2 ...................
Financial
Non-bank financial
institutions ...........................
Settlement accounts .................
Total gross loans and advances
to customers3 ............................
Percentage of Group loans and
advances by geographical
region .......................................
Impaired loans ..............................
5,068
506
42.1%
11.1%
9.4%
936
34.3%
3,710
3.1%
100.0%
1,226
11,446
Impaired loans as a percentage of
gross loans and advances to
customers .................................
Impairment allowances on
impaired loans and advances4 .
Impairment allowances on
impaired loans as a percentage
of impaired loans4 ....................
1.6%
0.6%
1.3%
1.4%
5.3%
1.5%
2,515
185
566
3,073
872
7,211
49.6%
36.6%
60.5%
82.8%
71.1%
63.0%
1 Includes Hong Kong Government Home Ownership Scheme loans of US$4,680 million.
2 Other commercial loans and advances include advances in respect of agriculture, transport, energy and utilities.
3 Includes credit card lending of US$66,020 million.
4 Disclosures previously made in respect of 2005 have been amended to comply with 2007’s presentation by excluding collective
impairment allowances on loans and advances not classified as impaired.
211
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Exposure > By industry sector
Loans and advances to customers by industry sector and by geographical region (continued)
(Unaudited)
At 31 December 2004
Europe
US$m
70,546
57,920
Hong
Kong
US$m
29,373
9,105
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
14,860
9,079
North
America
US$m
111,455
78,984
Gross
loans and
advances to
customers
US$m
Gross loans
by industry
sector as a
% of total
gross loans
%
Latin
America
US$m
1,613
4,917
227,847
160,005
128,466
38,478
23,939
190,439
6,530
387,852
55,018
18,917
6,850
3,663
34,185
14,132
10,388
5,959
615
7,294
19,177
4,232
3,350
1,432
7,015
9,544
9,712
4,266
1,174
5,173
4,005
220
324
3,643
1,484
101,876
43,469
20,749
10,527
55,151
118,633
38,388
35,206
29,869
9,676
231,772
30,901
4,476
35,377
1,932
596
2,528
2,297
305
2,602
16,624
8,431
25,055
575
11
586
52,329
13,819
66,148
33.3
23.3
56.6
14.9
6.3
3.0
1.5
8.1
33.8
7.6
2.0
9.6
282,476
79,394
61,747
245,363
16,792
685,772
100.0
41.2%
6,039
11.6%
696
9.0%
1,160
35.8%
3,555
2.4%
977
100.0%
12,427
2.1%
0.9%
1.9%
1.4%
5.8%
1.8%
4,036
320
785
4,106
770
10,017
66.8%
46.0%
67.7%
115.5%
78.8%
80.6%
Personal
Residential mortgages1 ...........
Other personal ........................
Corporate and commercial
Commercial, industrial and
international trade ..............
Commercial real estate ...........
Other property-related ............
Government ............................
Other commercial2...................
Financial
Non-bank financial
institutions ..........................
Settlement accounts ................
Total gross loans and
advances to customers3 ...........
Percentage of Group loans and
advances by geographical
region ......................................
Impaired loans4,5 ..........................
Impaired loans as a percentage of
gross loans and advances4 .......
Specific provisions outstanding
against loans and advances5 ...
Specific provisions outstanding
as a percentage of impaired
loans4,5 .....................................
1 Includes Hong Kong Government Home Ownership Scheme loans of US$5,383 million.
2 Other commercial loans and advances include advances in respect of agriculture, transport, energy and utilities.
3 Includes credit card lending of US$56,222 million.
4 Net of suspended interest.
5 Included in North America are non-performing loans of US$3,020 million and specific provisions of US$3,443 million in HSBC
Finance; excluding HSBC Finance, specific provisions outstanding as a percentage of non-performing loans was 54.6 per cent.
212
(Unaudited)
Personal
Residential mortgages1 ............
Other personal .........................
Corporate and commercial
Commercial, industrial and
international trade ...............
Commercial real estate ............
Other property-related .............
Government .............................
Other commercial3 ...................
Financial
Non-bank financial
institutions ...........................
Settlement accounts .................
Total gross loans and advances
to customers4 ............................
Percentage of Group loans and
advances by geographical
region .......................................
At 31 December 20032
Europe
US$m
51,721
42,041
Hong
Kong
US$m
29,954
7,420
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
12,101
7,135
North
America
US$m
76,485
73,717
Gross
loans and
advances to
customers
Latin
America
US$m
US$m
Gross loans
by industry
sector as a
% of total
gross loans
%
1,493
3,832
171,754
134,145
93,762
37,374
19,236
150,202
5,325
305,899
49,468
15,517
5,416
2,462
24,239
10,966
8,548
5,075
927
6,754
14,892
3,149
2,597
1,450
5,735
7,265
7,699
3,850
375
5,682
3,077
175
202
4,376
1,620
85,668
35,088
17,140
9,590
44,030
97,102
32,270
27,823
24,871
9,450
191,516
21,226
3,068
24,294
4,921
556
5,477
2,027
188
2,215
8,588
4,767
13,355
329
15
344
37,091
8,594
45,685
31.6
24.7
56.3
15.7
6.5
3.2
1.8
8.1
35.3
6.8
1.6
8.4
215,158
75,121
49,274
188,428
15,119
543,100
100.0
Non-performing loans6 .................
5,701
1,671
39.6%
13.8%
9.1%
1,538
34.7%
4,889
2.8%
100.0%
1,251
15,050
Non-performing loans as a
percentage of gross loans and
advances to customers5 ............
Specific provisions outstanding
against loans and advances6 ....
Specific provisions outstanding
as a percentage of non-
performing loans6 .....................
2.6%
2.2%
3.1%
2.6%
8.3%
2.8%
3,554
629
981
4,660
1,054
10,878
62.3%
37.6%
63.8%
95.3%
84.3%
72.3%
1 Includes Hong Kong Government Home Ownership Scheme loans of US$6,290 million.
2 Figures presented in this table were prepared in accordance with UK GAAP.
3 Other commercial loans include advances in respect of agriculture, transport, energy and utilities.
4 Includes credit card lending of US$48,634 million.
5 Net of suspended interest.
6 Included in North America are non-performing loans of US$4,335 million and specific provisions of US$4,448 million in HSBC
Finance; excluding HSBC Finance, specific provisions outstanding as a percentage of non-performing loans was 69.2 per cent.
213
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Exposure > Rest of Asia-Pacific and Latin America / Debt securities
Gross loans and advances to customers by principal country within Rest of Asia-Pacific and Latin America
(Audited)
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Australia .................................................
India .......................................................
Indonesia ................................................
Japan ......................................................
Mainland China .....................................
Malaysia .................................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) ...
Egypt .................................................
United Arab Emirates ........................
Other Middle East .............................
Singapore ...............................................
South Korea ...........................................
Taiwan ...................................................
Other ......................................................
Latin America
Argentina ...............................................
Brazil ......................................................
Mexico ...................................................
Panama ...................................................
Other ......................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Australia .................................................
India .......................................................
Indonesia ................................................
Japan ......................................................
Mainland China .....................................
Malaysia .................................................
Middle East (excluding Saudi Arabia) ...
Egypt .................................................
United Arab Emirates ........................
Other Middle East .............................
Singapore ...............................................
South Korea ...........................................
Taiwan ...................................................
Other ......................................................
Latin America
Argentina ...............................................
Brazil ......................................................
Mexico ...................................................
Panama ...................................................
Other ......................................................
At 31 December 2007
Residential
mortgages
US$m
Other
personal
US$m
Property-
related
US$m
Commercial,
international
trade and
other
US$m
4,376
1,545
24
29
500
2,632
1,036
–
895
141
3,946
2,596
2,061
1,652
922
1,721
497
126
6
1,508
4,441
196
2,936
1,309
3,403
880
648
2,361
2,065
339
12
566
1,746
787
2,870
126
2,159
585
1,712
61
–
2,098
3,998
3,723
1,171
3,541
9,443
4,024
13,536
1,575
8,222
3,739
2,471
3,608
1,072
7,025
Total
US$m
11,361
7,328
1,704
4,262
11,695
8,951
21,883
1,897
14,212
5,774
11,532
7,145
3,781
13,136
20,397
16,513
12,256
53,612
102,778
47
329
2,208
1,098
642
4,324
611
10,110
4,696
963
1,076
17,456
75
426
1,434
593
491
3,019
1,841
8,601
10,476
1,585
2,613
25,116
At 31 December 2006
Residential
mortgages
US$m
Other
personal
US$m
Property-
related
US$m
Commercial,
international
trade and
other
US$m
2,574
19,466
18,814
4,239
4,822
49,915
Total
US$m
8,789
4,971
1,404
3,398
6,116
7,859
15,896
1,010
10,245
4,641
9,653
6,270
4,139
9,980
2,013
12,253
14,761
4,201
3,952
37,180
1,615
203
2
648
1,504
589
1,733
60
1,308
365
1,286
45
15
1,353
8,993
52
251
959
604
284
2,951
2,363
1,014
2,601
4,226
3,537
10,595
825
6,624
3,146
2,052
2,655
970
5,765
1,625
5,212
8,648
1,642
2,608
38,729
78,475
3,637
1,338
17
18
377
2,456
434
–
331
103
3,090
2,708
2,273
1,130
586
1,067
371
131
9
1,277
3,134
125
1,982
1,027
3,225
862
881
1,732
17,478
13,275
314
6,579
3,353
854
568
22
211
1,801
1,101
492
3,627
214
11,668
2,150
19,735
Debt securities and other bills by rating agency
designation
(Audited)
The following table presents an analysis by rating
agency designation of debt and similar securities,
other than loans, based on Standard & Poor’s ratings
or their equivalent. Debt securities with short-term
ratings are reported against the long-term rating of
the issuer of the short-term debt securities. If major
rating agencies have different ratings for the same
debt securities, the securities are reported against the
lower rating.
Treasury
bills
US$m
Other
eligible bills
US$m
Debt
securities
US$m
At 31 December 2007
AAA ..............................................................................
AA– to AA+ .................................................................
A– to A+ .......................................................................
Lower than A– ..............................................................
Unrated .........................................................................
Supporting liabilities under linked insurance
and investment contracts1 .........................................
Of which issued by:
– governments .........................................................
– local authorities ....................................................
– asset-backed securities .........................................
– corporates and other .............................................
Of which classified as:
– trading assets ........................................................
– financial instruments designated at fair value .....
– available-for-sale securities .................................
– held-to-maturity investments ...............................
At 31 December 2006
AAA ..............................................................................
AA– to AA+ .................................................................
A– to A+ .......................................................................
Lower than A– ..............................................................
Unrated .........................................................................
Supporting liabilities under linked insurance
and investment contracts1 .........................................
Of which issued by:
– governments .........................................................
– local authorities ....................................................
– asset-backed securities .........................................
– corporates and other .............................................
Of which classified as:
– trading assets ........................................................
– financial instruments designated at fair value .....
– available-for-sale securities .................................
– held-to-maturity investments ...............................
13,234
17,470
11,082
2,577
1,225
51
45,639
44,717
287
–
635
45,639
16,307
181
29,151
–
45,639
20,360
15,478
8,146
1,208
1,134
54
46,380
44,941
370
–
1,069
46,380
21,751
133
24,451
45
46,380
229
263
300
293
–
–
1,085
–
–
–
1,085
1,085
132
–
953
–
1,085
282
247
91
205
–
–
825
–
–
–
825
825
8
–
817
–
825
199,310
99,357
67,402
28,995
37,481
7,741
440,286
164,848
2,532
94,555
178,351
440,286
178,834
21,150
230,534
9,768
440,286
146,087
77,578
66,408
21,240
20,475
4,304
336,092
120,369
8,704
42,804
164,215
336,092
155,447
9,449
161,870
9,326
336,092
Total
US$m
212,773
117,090
78,784
31,865
38,706
7,792
487,010
209,565
2,819
94,555
180,071
487,010
195,273
21,331
260,638
9,768
487,010
166,729
93,303
74,645
22,653
21,609
4,358
383,297
165,310
9,074
42,804
166,109
383,297
177,206
9,582
187,138
9,371
383,297
1 For securities supporting liabilities under linked insurance and investment contracts, financial risks are substantially borne by the
policyholders.
215
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Areas of special interest > Personal lending / US personal and mortgage lending
The commentary that follows is on a constant
currency basis.
At 31 December 2007, total personal lending
was US$501 billion, a rise of 3 per cent from
31 December 2006.
In 2007, loan impairment charges were
primarily in personal lending, representing 94 per
cent of the total charge. The three largest
components were Personal Financial Services in
North America (69 per cent), the UK (11 per cent)
and Latin America (9 per cent).
HSBC recorded strong growth in Latin
America, with gross loans and advances to
personal customers rising by 31 per cent to
US$22 billion. Residential mortgage lending in
the region increased by 18 per cent, while other
personal lending rose by 34 per cent.
In Mexico, HSBC’s other personal lending
balances grew by 41 per cent in 2007 to
US$5 billion, predominantly from growth in credit
card balances. In the same period, loan impairment
charges rose by US$574 million or 351 per cent,
driven by strong growth in loan balances, a
deterioration in credit quality and portfolio
seasoning.
The credit quality of the US personal lending
portfolio is discussed more fully below. In the UK,
credit conditions were relatively benign, with loan
impairment charges unchanged from 2006.
At
31 December
2007
US$m
At
31 December
2006
US$m
At
31 December
2005
US$m
98,816
13,266
32,223
17,411
37,620
199,336
170,252
131,246
500,834
107,492
13,146
29,269
16,645
41,214
207,766
157,845
110,535
476,146
103,529
12,792
26,795
15,488
35,545
194,149
135,017
91,310
420,476
Areas of special interest
Personal lending
(Unaudited)
HSBC provides a broad range of secured and
unsecured personal lending products to meet
customer needs. Given the diverse nature of the
markets in which HSBC operates, the range is not
standardised in all countries but, along with the
distribution channels used, is tailored to meet the
demands of individual markets, while using
common global IT platforms wherever possible.
Personal lending includes advances to
customers for asset purchase, including residential
property and motor vehicles, where such lending is
typically secured on the assets to be acquired.
HSBC also offers loans secured on existing assets,
such as first and second liens on residential
property; unsecured lending products such as
overdrafts, credit cards and payroll loans; and debt
consolidation loans which may be secured or
unsecured.
Various underwriting controls are applied
before the loan is issued, and loss in the event of
delinquency is managed through collection and
customer management procedures. The expected
occurrence and degree of delinquency varies
according to the type of loan and the customer
segment. Delinquency levels tend to increase in the
course of normal portfolio ageing. As a result, loan
impairment charges usually relate to lending
originated in earlier accounting periods.
Total personal lending
(Unaudited)
Total US personal lending
US Residential mortgages1 ..........................................................................
Motor vehicle finance .................................................................................
MasterCard and Visa credit cards ...............................................................
Private label cards .......................................................................................
Other personal lending ................................................................................
Residential mortgages, excluding the US .......................................................
Other personal lending, excluding the US ......................................................
1 Includes residential mortgages of HSBC Bank USA and HSBC Finance.
216
US personal lending
(Unaudited)
Total US personal lending fell by 4 per cent to
US$199 billion at 31 December 2007. Residential
mortgage balances were US$99 billion, a decline of
8 per cent, due to the continued run-down of the
correspondent portfolio in mortgage services, the
closure of the Decision One wholesale channel and
tightened underwriting criteria in the branch-based
consumer lending business, which curtailed growth.
Card balances rose by 8 per cent to
US$50 billion, but underlying growth slowed in the
latter part of the year following the decision to
reduce marketing and promotional activity in line
with reduced risk appetite, as the US economy
weakened. Motor vehicle finance loans rose by
1 per cent to US$13 billion, driven by strong growth
in the direct-to-consumer channel, partly offset by a
flat performance from participating dealerships in
the difficult economic environment.
Other personal lending fell by 9 per cent
to US$38 million due to tightening of underwriting
criteria and a reduction in direct mail campaigns.
Mortgage lending products
(Unaudited)
The Group offers a wide range of mortgage products
designed to meet customer needs. This includes
capital or principal repayment mortgages subject to
fixed or variable interest rates, and products
designed to meet demand for housing loans with
more flexible payment structures. HSBC underwrites
first lien residential mortgages and loans secured by
second lien mortgages; the latter are reported within
‘Other personal lending’ in the market sector
analysis on page 216. The bulk of the mortgage
lending products sold in the US consumer lending
branch network are for refinancing and debt
consolidation, rather than for house purchase.
Interest-only mortgages are those where
customers make regular payments of interest during
the life of the loan and repay the principal from the
sale of their home or alternative sources of funds
such as an endowment or other investment policy.
Introductory interest-only mortgages are where the
interest-only element is for a fixed term at the start
of the loan, after which principal repayments
commence. Affordability mortgages include all
products where the customer’s monthly payments
are set at a low initial rate, either variable or fixed,
before resetting to a higher rate once the introductory
period is over. These include ARMs, loans in which
the interest rate is periodically changed based on an
index.
HSBC has not offered, and does not anticipate
offering, ARMs with alternative payment options or
other negative amortisation products.
Affordability mortgages are primarily offered in
the US and the UK. Under the HFC and Beneficial
brands, HSBC Finance offers a range of products
and delivery channels designed for the needs of
customers with non-standard or less favourable
credit profiles. In the US, such mortgages
experienced heightened levels of delinquency in late
2006 and 2007. As a result, HSBC Finance took a
series of steps designed to curtail mortgage lending:
the mortgage services business ceased acquiring new
mortgages; the consumer lending business halted its
small volume of ARM loan originations, tightened
underwriting criteria and loan-to-income
requirements, and reduced loan-to-value ratios
for first and second lien loans. These measures
reduced HSBC Finance’s mortgage balances to
US$91 billion at 31 December 2007 (2006:
US$99 billion) as set out in the table below.
In the UK, affordability mortgages stood at
US$35 billion at 31 December 2007, compared with
US$33 billion at 31 December 2006. Overall credit
quality improved following measures taken in the
recent past to tighten underwriting standards and
improve the credit quality of new business.
Delinquency rates on mortgages in the UK offered
through HSBC Finance remained stable throughout
2007, with delinquency rates for loans offered in
2006 and 2007 lower than in the preceding two
years.
In the rest of the UK business, loan impairment
charges in the second half of 2007 were lower than
in the first half of the year, as overall credit quality
improved following recent measures to tighten
underwriting standards and improve the credit
quality of new business. Although losses from
mortgage lending remained low, maximum
loan-to-value ratios were reduced during the year
to mitigate the effects of a possible housing market
downturn.
The following table shows the levels of
mortgage lending products in the various portfolios
of HSBC Finance and the rest of the HSBC Group:
217
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Areas of special interest > US personal and mortgage lending
Mortgage lending products
(Unaudited)
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
At 31 December 2005
HSBC
Finance1 Other
US$m
US$m
HSBC
Finance1
US$m
Total
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
HSBC
Finance1
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
Total mortgage lending2 ....
90,787
199,805
290,592
99,150
189,348
288,498
85,662
171,491
257,153
Interest-only (including
endowment) mortgages3,4
Affordability mortgages,
including ARMs .............
Other .................................
Total interest-only and
–
34,425
34,425
–
33,190
33,190
–
27,418
27,418
19,218
85
60,426
1,078
79,644
1,163
30,169
–
60,106
295
90,275
295
25,244
–
56,396
388
81,640
388
affordability mortgages ..
19,303
95,929
115,232
30,169
93,591
123,760
25,244
84,202
109,446
As a percentage of total
mortgage lending ...........
21.3%
48.0%
39.7%
30.4%
49.4%
42.9%
29.5%
49.1%
42.6%
Second lien mortgages ......
16,820
4,704
21,524
19,420
4,938
24,358
15,338
4,526
19,864
As a percentage of total
mortgage lending ...........
18.5%
2.4%
7.4%
19.6%
2.6%
8.4%
17.9%
2.6%
7.7%
Negative equity
mortgages5 ......................
11,360
997
12,357
12,347
2,450
14,797
14,168
2,328
16,496
Other loan to value ratios
greater than 90 per cent6 .
As a percentage of total
42,121
13,317
55,438
45,712
19,608
65,320
35,514
20,468
55,982
53,481
14,314
67,795
58,059
22,058
80,117
49,682
22,796
72,478
mortgage lending ...........
58.9%
7.2%
23.3%
58.6%
11.6%
27.8%
58.0%
13.3%
28.2%
1 HSBC Finance is shown on a management basis and includes lending in Canada and the UK and loans transferred to HSBC USA Inc.
which are managed by HSBC Finance.
2 Total mortgage lending includes residential mortgages and second lien mortgage lending reported within ‘Other personal lending’.
3 Excludes introductory interest-only loans.
4 Some mortgage lending products are included in more than one, or none, of the types of mortgage specified in this table.
5 Negative equity arises when the value of the loan exceeds the value of available equity, and is generally based on values at origination
date.
6 Loan to value ratios are generally based on values at origination date.
HSBC Finance mortgage lending
(Unaudited)
HSBC Finance held approximately US$91 billion of
residential mortgage loans and advances to personal
customers at 31 December 2007, 18 per cent of the
Group’s gross loans and advances to personal
customers.
At 31 December 2007, the balance outstanding
of introductory interest-only loans in the US
mortgage services business was US$4 billion,
compared with US$6 billion in 2006, a decline of
36 per cent. No such loans were advanced in the
consumer lending business.
The outstanding balance of ARMs in the US
mortgage services business at 31 December 2007
was US$16 billion, a decrease of 41 per cent,
compared with the end of 2006. In the consumer
lending business, adjustable-rate loans fell by
16 per cent to US$3 billion following the decision to
cease the sale of these products in August 2007.
Second lien loans extended through the
mortgage services business decreased by 33 per cent
to US$7 billion, while the consumer lending
business recorded a 6 per cent increase to
US$7 billion.
The balance of HSBC Finance’s stated-income
mortgages was approximately US$8.3 billion at the
end of 2007 (2006: US$11.8 billion), all of which
were held by mortgage services. The consumer
lending business did not originate any stated-income
mortgages in either period.
218
HSBC Finance mortgage lending1
(Unaudited)
Year ended 31 December 2007
Year ended 31 December 20062
Year ended 31 December 2005
Mortgage
services
US$m
Consumer
lending
US$m
Other
mortgage
lending3
US$m
Mortgage
services
US$m
Consumer
lending
US$m
Other
mortgage
lending3
US$m
Mortgage
Consumer
services
US$m
lending
US$m
Other
mortgage
lending3
US$m
20,146
47,254
2,597
22,358
42,378
2,210
20,088
36,187
1,642
Fixed-rate ...............
Adjustable-rate and
introductory rate .
16,070
2,970
Total .......................
36,216
50,224
First lien .................
Second lien ............
29,475
6,741
43,366
6,858
Total .......................
36,216
50,224
1,750
4,347
1,126
3,221
4,347
27,114
3,528
49,472
45,906
39,404
10,068
39,406
6,500
49,472
45,906
1,562
3,772
920
2,852
3,772
24,211
1,796
44,299
37,983
36,278
8,021
33,242
4,741
44,299
37,983
1,738
3,380
804
2,576
3,380
Adjustable-rate .......
Introductory
12,361
2,970
1,748
21,344
3,528
1,562
19,037
1,796
1,733
interest-only .......
3,709
–
2
5,770
–
–
5,174
–
5
Total .......................
16,070
2,970
1,750
27,114
3,528
1,562
24,211
1,796
1,738
1 Management basis.
2 Restated to show HSBC Finance management basis, consistent with the current year.
3 Includes balances in the UK and Canada.
US personal lending credit quality
(Unaudited)
In 2007, a cycle of declining house prices, reduced
availability of mortgage finance and growing
customer delinquency and default caused a
deterioration in credit quality of increasing intensity.
Housing markets in a large part of the US have
been affected by a broad-based slowdown in the rate
of appreciation in property values, with actual
declines in many markets, including California,
Florida and Arizona, where earlier price increases
had been significant. The S&P/Case-Shiller 10-City
Composite Index showed a record decline in house
prices of 8.4 per cent in the year to November 2007.
There was a high degree of correlation between
the increase in delinquency throughout 2007 and
declining house prices. Two months or more
delinquencies rose most rapidly in those states
which, prior to 2007, demonstrated superior credit
performance, the greatest rate of appreciation and the
highest home values.
The rising level of delinquencies led investors to
question the reliability of credit ratings, not only for
residential mortgage-backed securities but for a wide
range of structured credit products. Investors became
increasingly unwilling to purchase securitised credit,
leading to a sharp contraction in flows of credit
through the affected channels. The exit of a number
of participants in the sub-prime mortgage industry,
together with a tightening of underwriting criteria by
remaining providers, led to fewer refinancing
options for customers. This created particular
problems for borrowers with affordability mortgages
who faced a considerable increase in their monthly
repayments at the end of their discounted
introductory periods.
Within HSBC’s portfolio, the rise in
delinquencies, first reported in 2006 in the sub-prime
second lien mortgages within the mortgage services
business, spread initially to other parts of mortgage
services, then to the branch-based consumer lending
business and, in the closing months of the year, to
the credit card business as the US economy
weakened and credit availability contracted.
Loans originated in 2005, 2006 and early 2007
experienced worse credit performance than earlier
vintages. The highest delinquency rates were in
second lien loans whose borrowers also had first lien
loans that were ARMs.
In addition, a significant number of second lien
customers had underlying ARMs that faced repricing
in the near term. As the interest rate adjustments
occurred in an environment of lower house prices
and tightening credit, the probability of default was
greater than generally experienced prior to 2007.
Second lien loans have a heightened risk profile,
for the reasons noted above. These loans often have
higher loan-to-value ratios because, in many cases,
the second lien loan was necessary to complete the
219
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Areas of special interest > US personal lending / Loan delinquency in US
HSBC Finance: geographical concentration of US lending1
(Unaudited)
California ...............................................................................
Florida ....................................................................................
New York ...............................................................................
Texas ......................................................................................
Ohio .......................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..........................................................................
Mortgage lending as a
percentage of:
Other personal lending as a
percentage of
total
lending
%
6
4
3
2
3
3
total
mortgage
lending
%
12
7
6
3
5
5
total
lending
%
6
3
3
4
2
2
total other
personal
lending
%
12
7
6
8
5
5
Percentage
of total
lending
%
12
7
6
6
5
5
1 By states which individually account for 5 per cent or more of HSBC Finance’s US customer loan portfolio.
purchase of the property. For second lien
mortgages, the proportion of customers two months
or more behind on contractual payments rose from
3.97 per cent at 31 December 2006 to 9.02 per cent
at the end of 2007. Loss on default of second lien
loans approaches 100 per cent of the amount owed
as any collateral in the property is applied initially
to the first lien loan.
Stated-income mortgages are also of above
average risk as these were underwritten on the basis
of borrowers’ representations of annual income, not
verified by receipt of supporting documentation. In
HSBC Finance mortgage services, two months or
more delinquency rates on stated-income loans rose
from 6.36 per cent at 31 December 2006 to
19.01 per cent at 31 December 2007. In part, the
percentage rise is due to a decline in loan balances
as the mortgage loan portfolio is run off.
In mortgage services, the deterioration in credit
performance first reported in 2006 continued. In
the second half of 2007, credit quality became
progressively worse due to the market conditions
discussed above. Two months or more
delinquencies increased from US$2.3 billion,
4.64 per cent of loans and advances at the end
of 2006, to US$4.1 billion, 11.24 per cent at
31 December 2007. The increase in the
delinquency rate was partly due to the reduction
in the size of the portfolio.
In response, HSBC took several management
actions to reposition the US consumer business.
In March 2007, it took the decision to cease
purchasing mortgages from third party
correspondents. In September 2007, the Group
closed its wholesale business, Decision One,
ending new originations for the mortgage
services business.
The branch-based consumer lending business
experienced relatively stable performance in its
portfolio throughout 2006 and into the first half of
220
2007. Starting in the fourth quarter of 2006,
delinquencies began to rise in loans of 2005 and
later vintages, to levels above what had been
previously experienced. This trend was also seen in
the rest of the industry. It is clear that, for some
time, equity withdrawal has been the principal
source of credit available to sub-prime borrowers
dealing with unforeseen financial needs. Declining
house prices and an industry-wide tightening of
underwriting criteria have significantly reduced the
ability of consumers to refinance. Starting from the
third quarter, these factors had a marked effect on
consumer lending delinquency. Two months or
more delinquencies rose from 2.22 per cent at
31 December 2006 to 4.18 per cent of loans and
advances at the end of 2007. Delinquent balances
doubled to US$2.1 billion. In this environment,
HSBC took steps to tighten underwriting standards,
including decreasing the loan to value ratio for
residential mortgages and ceasing to underwrite
certain products. To match the consequent
reduction in demand and risk appetite, the network
was reduced from nearly 1,400 branches to some
1,000.
HSBC also sold parts of the loan portfolio
when opportunities arose at suitable valuations. In
the first half of 2007, a total of US$2.7 billion of
mortgage services’ loans that did not include any
loans 30 days or more delinquent were sold.
Credit card delinquencies of two months or
more rose from 4.48 per cent at the end of 2006 to
5.68 per cent of receivables at 31 December 2007.
In part, this was due to a change in product mix, as
originations in the sub-prime and near-prime parts
of the portfolio grew at faster rates than the overall
portfolio. There was also an increase in bankruptcy
rates as levels moved closer to historical norms
following the exceptionally low level of filings
seen during 2006. Additionally, in the fourth
quarter of 2007, delinquencies began to rise in all
vintages, particularly in the markets experiencing
the greatest home value depreciation, driven by
rising unemployment rates in these markets and a
weakening US economy.
In vehicle finance, two months or more
delinquencies moved from 3.16 per cent at the end
of 2006 to 3.68 per cent at 31 December 2007. The
increased delinquency in the vehicle finance
portfolio was not as severe as has been experienced
elsewhere in the industry. In 2007, the vehicle
finance business tightened underwriting criteria in
both the dealer and direct-to-consumer channels, to
convert the mix of new loans to a higher credit
quality.
HSBC has been proactive in reaching out to
customers to provide financial counselling and
assist them in restructuring their debts to avoid
foreclosure. As a consequence, HSBC restructured
and modified loans that it believed could be
serviced, in line with local policies. In particular,
customers with ARM loans approaching the first
reset were contacted in order to assess their ability
to make the higher payments and, where
appropriate, to refinance or modify their loans.
As a result, in 2007 HSBC has modified more
than 8,500 loans with an aggregate balance of more
than US$1.4 billion.
In 2007, approximately US$4.5 billion of
ARM loans reached their first interest rate reset.
In 2008, approximately US$6.5 billion of ARMs
will reach their first interest rate reset, of which
US$2.8 billion relates to HSBC Bank USA and
US$3.7 billion to HSBC Finance. Within the latter,
US$2.7 billion is in mortgage services, the
remainder in consumer lending. ARMs in HSBC
Bank USA are largely prime balances. Delinquency
rates are expected to continue to rise in 2008, as the
limiting of originations means that the portfolio
will mostly be running off. A deterioration in
economic conditions and the housing market would
also increase delinquencies.
Loan delinquency in the US
(Unaudited)
The following tables provide a detailed analysis of
loan delinquency in the US.
Two months and over contractual delinquency in Personal Financial Services in the US
(Unaudited)
31
December
2007
US$m
30
September
2007
US$m
5,404
3,868
1,589
488
1,830
598
2,634
1,240
451
1,581
536
2,238
9,914
Residential mortgages1 ..
Second lien mortgage
lending1 ......................
Vehicle finance2 .............
Credit card .....................
Private label ...................
Personal non-credit card
Total1 ..............................
12,543
Quarter ended
31
March
2007
US$m
31
December
2006
US$m
30
September
2006
US$m
2,703
2,733
2,335
855
302
1,274
429
1,881
7,444
810
415
1,312
471
1,888
7,629
580
421
1,217
444
1,696
6,693
30
June
2007
US$m
2,992
941
384
1,314
434
2,000
8,065
30
June
2006
US$m
1,999
416
367
1,089
419
1,518
5,808
31
March
2006
US$m
1,892
352
292
1,100
373
1,518
5,527
%3
%3
%3
%3
%3
%3
%3
%3
Residential mortgages1 ..
Second lien mortgage
lending1 ......................
Vehicle finance2 .............
Credit card .....................
Private label ...................
Personal non-credit card
Total1 ..............................
5.47
3.83
9.02
3.68
5.68
3.43
13.16
6.29
6.81
3.40
5.09
3.28
10.88
4.95
2.92
5.02
2.91
4.32
2.72
9.69
4.00
2.54
4.35
2.29
4.43
2.65
9.33
3.64
2.54
3.97
3.16
4.48
2.83
9.05
3.67
2.19
1.89
1.81
2.79
3.21
4.46
2.88
8.23
3.28
2.03
2.82
4.09
2.84
7.56
2.89
1.81
2.27
4.28
2.60
7.70
2.81
1 Consumer lending balances for the first three quarters of 2006 have been restated due to a reclassification of balances between first lien
and second lien. Mortgage services balances for the second half of 2006 and the first half of 2007 have been restated due to a
reclassification of assets between foreclosed and second lien.
2 In December 2006, the vehicle finance business changed its write-off policy to provide that the principal balance of vehicle loans in
excess of the estimated net realisable value will be written off 30 days (previously 90 days) after the financed vehicle has been
repossessed if it remains unsold, unless it becomes 150 days contractually delinquent, at which time such excess will be written off. This
resulted in a one-time acceleration of write-offs totalling US$24 million in December 2006. In connection with this policy change, the
vehicle finance business also changed its methodology for reporting two months and over contractual delinquency to include loan
balances associated with repossessed vehicles which have not yet been written down to net realisable value. This resulted in an increase
of 42 basis points to the vehicle finance delinquency ratio and an increase of 3 basis points to the total consumer delinquency ratio.
3 Expressed as a percentage of loans and advances in Personal Financial Services in the US.
221
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Cross border exposure / Credit quality
Two months and over contractual delinquency in mortgage services and consumer lending
(Unaudited)
31
December
2007
US$m
30
September
2007
US$m
30
June
2007
US$m
31
March
2007
US$m
31
December
2006
US$m
30
September
2006
US$m
Quarter ended
Mortgage services:
– first lien ....................
– second lien1 ..............
Total mortgage services1
Consumer lending:
– first lien1 ...................
– second lien1 ..............
Total consumer lending .
Mortgage services:
– first lien ....................
– second lien1 ..............
Total mortgage services1
Consumer lending:
– first lien1 ...................
– second lien1 ..............
Total consumer lending .
3,033
1,038
4,071
1,622
478
2,100
%2
10.29
15.40
11.24
3.74
6.97
4.18
2,345
832
3,177
1,259
346
1,605
%2
7.46
11.16
8.17
2.92
5.03
3.21
30
June
2006
US$m
1,219
263
1,482
627
133
760
1,909
660
2,569
907
236
1,695
595
2,290
832
220
1,728
570
2,298
820
200
1,143
1,052
1,020
1,489
405
1,894
677
143
820
%2
%2
%2
%2
%2
5.76
7.87
6.19
2.15
3.60
2.34
4.53
6.40
4.90
2.03
3.34
2.21
4.39
5.60
4.64
2.08
3.08
2.22
3.68
3.61
3.67
1.85
2.45
1.93
3.04
2.32
2.88
1.78
2.39
1.86
31
March
2006
US$m
1,094
184
1,278
639
154
793
%2
2.80
1.80
2.59
1.88
2.70
2.00
1 Consumer lending balances for the first three quarters of 2006 have been restated due to a reclassification of balances between first lien
and second lien. Mortgage services balances for the second half of 2006 and the first half of 2007 have been restated due to a
reclassification of assets between foreclosed and second lien.
2 Expressed as a percentage of loans and advances in Personal Financial Services in the US.
Country distribution of outstandings and
cross-border exposures
(Unaudited)
HSBC controls the risk associated with cross-border
lending, essentially that foreign currency will not be
made available to local residents to make payments,
through a centralised structure of internal country
limits which are determined by taking into account
relevant economic and political factors. Exposures to
individual countries and cross-border exposure in
aggregate are kept under continual review.
The following table summarises the aggregate
of in-country foreign currency and cross-border
outstandings by type of borrower to countries which
individually represent in excess of 1 per cent of
HSBC’s total assets. The classification is based on
the country of residence of the borrower but also
recognises the transfer of country risk in respect of
third party guarantees, eligible collateral held and
residence of the head office when the borrower is a
branch. In accordance with the Bank of England
Country Exposure Report (Form CE) guidelines,
outstandings comprise loans and advances
(excluding settlement accounts), amounts receivable
under finance leases, acceptances, commercial bills,
CDs and debt and equity securities (net of short
positions), and exclude accrued interest and
intra-HSBC exposures.
222
In-country foreign currency and cross-border outstandings
(Unaudited)
At 31 December 2007
UK ...................................................................................
US ...................................................................................
France .............................................................................
Germany .........................................................................
The Netherlands ..............................................................
At 31 December 2006
UK ...................................................................................
Germany .........................................................................
US ...................................................................................
France .............................................................................
The Netherlands ..............................................................
Italy .................................................................................
At 31 December 2005
UK ...................................................................................
US ...................................................................................
Germany .........................................................................
France .............................................................................
The Netherlands ..............................................................
Italy .................................................................................
At 31 December 2007, HSBC had in-country
foreign currency and cross-border outstandings to
counterparties in Hong Kong, Belgium and Ireland
of between 0.75 per cent and 1.0 per cent of total
assets. The aggregate in-country foreign currency
and cross-border outstandings were: Hong Kong,
US$19.7 billion; Belgium, US$19.3 billion and
Ireland, US$19.3 billion.
At 31 December 2006, HSBC had in-country
foreign currency and cross-border outstandings to
counterparties in Australia and Hong Kong of
between 0.75 per cent and 1 per cent of total assets.
The aggregate in-country foreign currency and cross-
border outstandings were: Australia, US$17.5 billion;
Hong Kong, US$15.5 billion.
At 31 December 2005, HSBC had in-country
foreign currency and cross-border outstandings to
counterparties in Hong Kong, Australia and Canada
of between 0.75 per cent and 1 per cent of total
assets. The aggregate in-country foreign currency
and cross-border outstandings were: Hong Kong,
US$14.6 billion; Australia, US$12.5 billion; Canada,
US$11.7 billion.
Credit quality
The following tables reflect, with the principal
exception of developments in US personal portfolios
Government
and official
institutions
US$bn
Banks
US$bn
Other
US$bn
Total
US$bn
32.3
14.0
38.8
30.3
21.4
24.8
23.7
9.5
22.1
14.4
4.7
19.6
10.2
21.6
11.5
11.9
4.4
2.2
11.4
1.7
5.9
0.2
–
18.9
12.7
2.4
2.1
12.5
3.7
11.1
12.7
4.7
2.6
10.6
47.5
29.5
1.9
5.6
4.2
33.5
2.0
16.2
6.1
3.9
1.4
16.2
17.1
3.3
5.4
4.4
3.5
82.0
54.9
42.4
41.8
25.8
58.3
44.6
38.4
30.6
20.4
18.6
39.5
38.4
37.6
21.6
18.9
18.5
that are extensively commented upon in ‘Areas of
special interest’ above, broadly stable credit quality
across the majority of the Group’s businesses.
Loans and advances that were neither past due
nor impaired decreased marginally to 94.4 per cent
(2006: 94.9 per cent) of total loans and advances.
Among these, however, those classified as grades
1-3 (satisfactory risk) increased to 96.0 per cent
(2006: 92.9 per cent).
The further deterioration in quality in,
principally, US personal lending was reflected in an
increase in the proportion of loans and advances
to customers which were past due, though not
impaired, to 5.1 per cent (2006: 4.6 per cent,
following restatement). The great majority of such
loans were in the band of past due up to 90 days.
The credit quality of loans and advances to
banks remained broadly stable, showing overall a
marginal improvement on its already favourable
condition as at year-end 2006, and with a partial shift
in the quality profile of neither past due nor impaired
accounts being partly offset by a reduction in those
that were past due.
Details of impaired loans and advances to
customers, which increased from 1.56 per cent to
1.83 per cent of total loans and advances to
customers, are commented on further below.
223
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Credit quality > Loans and advances
Loans and advances
Distribution of loans and advances by credit quality
(Audited)
Loans and advances:
– neither past due nor impaired ................................
– past due but not impaired ......................................
– impaired .................................................................
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
Loans and
advances to
customers
US$m
931,872
50,577
18,304
1,000,753
Loans and
advances to
banks
US$m
Loans and
advances to
customers1
US$m
237,339
22
12
237,373
827,495
40,431
13,785
881,711
Loans and
advances to
banks
US$m
185,125
72
15
185,212
1 The amounts reported in 2006 as ‘past due but not impaired’ have been amended to include certain loans previously classified as
‘neither past due nor impaired’. The reclassification reflects the fact that, while these loans are in early-stage arrears, a proportion arise
from events unrelated to poor credit quality, and historical experience suggests that only a small percentage of such loans progresses
through stages of delinquency to default. This reclassification has no effect on total impaired loans or impairment allowances.
Distribution of loans and advances neither past due nor impaired
(Audited)
The credit quality of the portfolio of loans and
advances that were neither past due nor impaired can
be assessed by reference to the Group’s legacy
credit risk grading system, on which the following
information is based:
Grades:
1 to 3 – satisfactory risk ...........................................
4 – watch list and special mention ...........................
5 – sub-standard but not impaired ............................
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
Loans and
advances to
customers1
US$m
Loans and
advances to
banks
US$m
Loans and
advances to
customers1
US$m
886,432
39,229
6,211
931,872
236,314
504
521
237,339
769,392
51,899
6,204
827,495
Loans and
advances to
banks
US$m
184,059
1,040
26
185,125
1 The majority of the loans and advances to customers that are operating within revised terms following restructuring, for details of which
see ‘Renegotiated loans’ below, are included in this table.
Grades 1 and 2 include corporate facilities
demonstrating financial condition, risk factors and
capacity to repay that are good to excellent,
residential mortgages with low to moderate loan
to value ratios and other retail accounts which are
maintained within generally applicable product
parameters.
Grade 3 represents satisfactory risk, and
includes corporate facilities that require closer
monitoring, mortgages with higher loan to value
ratios, credit card exposures and other retail
exposures which operate outside generally
applicable product parameters without being
impaired.
Grades 4 and 5 include facilities that require
varying degrees of special attention and all retail
exposures that are progressively between 30 and
90 days past due (60 days for US motor loans).
Grades 6 or 7 represent impaired exposures.
Loans and advances which are individually
assessed for impairment are identified on an
individual basis and classified as grades 6 or 7 when
they are impaired. It is not practicable to individually
identify impaired loans and advances within
portfolios of homogeneous loans which are assessed
on a collective basis for impairment. In practice,
such loans and advances are not individually
identified as impaired until the time each impaired
loan is written off. It is therefore necessary to
estimate the carrying value of impaired loans and
advances within these portfolios.
The approach adopted by HSBC to estimate the
carrying value of impaired loans and advances
within portfolios of homogeneous loans that are
collectively assessed for impairment, is to classify
these loans and advances as impaired when the
224
balances are 90 days or more past due, except for US
motor loans which are classified as impaired when
60 days or more past due. These loans and advances
are classified as grades 6 and 7. All other
collectively assessed loans and advances, including
those which are less than 90 days past due (less than
60 days for US motor loans), are classified as not
impaired and reported within grades 1 to 5.
Collective impairment allowances are recognised in
relation to losses that are likely to have been
incurred at the balance sheet date on which they are
collectively assessed for impairment and classified
loans in grades 1 to 5, representing a small
percentage of the total loans and advances in
these grades.
Loans and advances which were past due but not
impaired
(Audited)
Examples of exposures designated past due but not
considered impaired include loans that have missed
the most recent payment date but on which there is
no evidence of impairment; loans fully secured by
cash collateral; residential mortgages in arrears more
than 90 days, but where the value of collateral is
sufficient to repay both the principal debt and all
potential interest for at least one year; and short-term
trade facilities past due more than 90 days for
technical reasons such as delays in documentation,
but where there is no concern over the
creditworthiness of the counterparty.
Past due up to 29 days ..................................................
Past due 30–59 days .....................................................
Past due 60–89 days .....................................................
Past due 90–179 days ...................................................
Past due over 180 days .................................................
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
Loans and
advances to
customers1
US$m
Loans and
advances to
banks
US$m
Loans and
advances to
customers1
US$m
Loans and
advances to
banks
US$m
33,909
10,546
3,992
48,447
1,767
363
50,577
22
–
–
22
–
–
22
28,359
7,353
2,796
38,508
1,764
159
40,431
72
–
–
72
–
–
72
1 The majority of the loans and advances to customers that are operating within revised terms following restructuring, for details of which
see ‘Renegotiated loans’ below, are excluded from this table.
This ageing analysis includes past due loans and
advances on which collective impairment allowances
have been assessed, though at their early stage of
arrears there is no identifiable impairment as such.
Impaired loans and advances
(Audited)
Total impaired loans and advances to:
– banks ...........................................................................................................................................
– customers ....................................................................................................................................
At 31 December
2007
US$m
12
18,304
18,316
2006
US$m
15
13,785
13,800
Customer loans and advances and impairment allowances by geographical region
(Audited)
The table below presents an analysis of the
impairment allowances recognised for impaired
loans and advances that are either individually
assessed or collectively assessed, and an analysis of
collective impairment allowances on loans and
advances classified as not impaired.
225
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Credit quality > Loans and advances > 2007 / Renegotiated loans
Individually assessed loans and
advances to customers
Collectively assessed loans and
advances to customers1
Individual
impairment
allowances
US$m
Gross
loans and
advances
US$m
%
Collective
impairment
allowances
US$m
Gross
loans and
advances
US$m
%
Total
Total
impairment
allowances
US$m
Gross
loans and
advances
US$m
%
At 31 December 2007
Impaired loans and
advances2
Europe ...................
Hong Kong ............
Rest of Asia-Pacific
North America .......
Latin America ........
Collectively assessed
loans and advances
not impaired3
Europe ...................
Hong Kong ............
Rest of Asia-Pacific
North America .......
Latin America ........
At 31 December 2006
Impaired loans and
advances2
Europe ...................
Hong Kong ............
Rest of Asia-Pacific
North America .......
Latin America ........
Collectively assessed
loans and advances
not impaired3
Europe ...................
Hong Kong ............
Rest of Asia-Pacific
North America .......
Latin America ........
1,846
132
349
119
253
2,699
4,558
378
678
421
442
40.5
34.9
51.5
28.3
57.2
6,477
41.7
1,203
12
203
7,057
1,113
9,588
882
232
374
4,804
626
6,918
1,696
55
410
7,963
1,703
70.9
21.8
49.5
88.6
65.4
3,049
144
552
7,176
1,366
6,254
433
1,088
8,384
2,145
48.8
33.3
50.7
85.6
63.7
11,827
81.1
12,287
18,304
67.1
449,952
89,581
101,690
293,456
47,770
982,449
0.2
0.3
0.4
1.6
1.3
0.7
1.7
882
232
374
4,804
626
6,918
449,952
89,581
101,690
293,456
47,770
982,449
19,205
1,000,753
0.2
0.3
0.4
1.6
1.3
0.7
1.9
2,699
6,477
16,506
994,276
1,725
131
362
109
238
2,565
4,031
407
649
421
325
42.8
32.2
55.8
25.9
73.2
5,833
44.0
1,209
17
228
3,716
787
5,957
742
217
311
3,422
364
5,056
1,816
47
535
4,401
1,153
66.6
36.2
42.6
84.4
68.3
7,952
74.9
390,328
84,193
77,291
280,412
35,702
867,926
0.2
0.3
0.4
1.2
1.0
0.6
1.3
2,934
148
590
3,825
1,025
8,522
742
217
311
3,422
364
5,056
5,847
454
1,184
4,822
1,478
50.2
32.6
49.8
79.3
69.4
13,785
61.8
390,328
84,193
77,291
280,412
35,702
867,926
0.2
0.3
0.4
1.2
1.0
0.6
1.5
2,565
5,833
11,013
875,878
13,578
881,711
1 Collectively assessed loans and advances comprise homogeneous groups of loans that are not considered individually significant, and
loans subject to individual assessment where no impairment has been identified on an individual basis, but on which a collective
impairment allowance has been calculated to reflect losses which have been incurred but not yet identified.
2 Impaired loans and advances are grades 6 and 7 by reference to the Group’s legacy credit rating system.
3 Collectively assessed loans and advances not impaired are grades 1 to 5 by reference to the Group’s legacy credit rating system.
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
(Unaudited)
Total impaired loans to customers were
US$18.3 billion at 31 December 2007, an increase of
33 per cent since the end of 2006 (28 per cent at
constant currency). Impaired loans were 2 per cent
of gross customer loans and advances, broadly in
line with 31 December 2006.
The commentary that follows compares
balances at 31 December 2007 with those at
31 December 2006, at constant exchange rates.
In Europe, impaired loans at US$6.3 billion
were 2 per cent higher than at the end of 2006.
Higher impaired loans in France and Turkey were
226
partly offset by a decline in the UK, where changes
in underwriting practices resulted in a fall in
personal unsecured lending in 2007.
In Hong Kong, impaired loans declined by
4 per cent to US$433 million. Credit conditions were
very favourable, reflecting the strong local economy
and buoyant equity and property markets.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, the decline in impaired
loans of 11 per cent to US$1.1 billion was mainly
driven by lower impaired loans in Taiwan following
the non-recurrence of the effect of regulatory
changes which, in 2006, led to a significant increase
in impaired loans. This was partly offset by a rise in
impaired loans in India due to strong growth in
personal lending.
In North America, HSBC recorded a
73 per cent increase in impaired loans to
US$8.4 billion at 31 December 2007. The consumer
finance business in the US was responsible for the
Individually impaired loans and advances to customers
(Audited)
bulk of the change. HSBC Finance experienced a
deterioration in credit quality in most of its lending
book, in particular for first and second lien
mortgages originated in 2005 and 2006. In the final
quarter of the year, in line with the market,
delinquencies rose in the credit card portfolio, with a
smaller rise in vehicle finance loans. A full
discussion of these developments and their effect on
credit quality is provided in the ‘Areas of special
interest’ commentary on page 216. In Canada,
although impaired loans rose from a low base, credit
conditions remained strong.
In Latin America, impaired loans increased by
30 per cent to US$2.1 billion, primarily due to a rise
of 76 per cent in impaired loans in Mexico. This was
due to portfolio growth, seasoning and higher
delinquency rates on credit cards. Revenues from
this growth in credit card lending more than covered
the rise in impairment charges.
Europe
US$m
Hong
Kong
US$m
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Gross
impaired
loans and
advances to
customers
US$m
% of total
gross
impaired
loans1
%
Latin
America
US$m
At 31 December 2007
Individually impaired loans and
advances to customers:
– personal ...............................
– commercial and corporate ...
At 31 December 2006
Individually impaired loans and
advances to customers:
– personal ...............................
– commercial and corporate ...
1,073
3,485
4,558
975
3,056
4,031
178
200
378
231
176
407
225
453
678
118
531
649
68
353
421
173
248
421
4
438
442
1
324
325
1,548
4,929
6,477
1,498
4,335
5,833
23.9
76.1
100.0
25.7
74.3
100.0
1 Gross impaired loans by industry sector as a percentage of total gross impaired loans.
Interest forgone on impaired loans
(Audited)
Interest income that would have been recognised
under the original terms of impaired and restructured
loans amounted to approximately US$1.1 billion
in 2007 (2006: US$0.7 billion). Interest income from
such loans of approximately US$374 million was
recorded in 2007.
Renegotiated loans
(Audited)
Restructuring activity is designed to manage
customer relationships, maximise collection
opportunities and, if possible, avoid foreclosure or
repossession. Such activities include extended
payment arrangements, approved external debt
management plans, deferring foreclosure,
modification, loan rewrites and/or deferral of
payments pending a change in circumstances.
Following restructuring, an overdue consumer
account is normally reset from delinquent to current
status. Restructuring policies and practices are based
on indicators or criteria which, in the judgement of
local management, indicate that repayment will
probably continue. These policies are required to be
kept under continual review and their application
varies according to the nature of the market, the
227
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Credit quality > Renegotiated loans / Impairment allowances and charges
product, and the availability of empirically based
data. Criteria vary between products, but typically
include: receipt of one or more qualifying payments
within a certain period, a minimum lapse of time
from origination before restructuring may occur, and
restrictions on the number and/or frequency of
successive restructurings. When empirical evidence
indicates an increased propensity to default on
restructured accounts, the use of roll rate
methodology ensures this factor is taken into account
when calculating impairment allowances.
Renegotiated loans that would otherwise be
past due or impaired totalled US$28 billion at
31 December 2007 (2006: US$21 billion).
Restructuring is most commonly applied to
consumer finance portfolios. The largest
concentration was in the US and amounted to
US$24 billion (2006: US$17 billion) or 86 per cent
(2006: 81 per cent) of the Group’s total renegotiated
loans. The increase was due to a significant
deterioration in credit quality in the US. Most
restructurings in the US related to loans secured
on real estate.
US loan modifications
(Unaudited)
In October 2006, as part of its efforts to mitigate risk
in the affected components of the mortgage services
portfolio in the US, HSBC Finance established a
new programme specifically designed to meet the
needs of selected customers with ARMs. HSBC
Finance is proactively calling and writing to
customers who have ARM loans nearing their first
reset that HSBC Finance expects will be the most
affected by a rate adjustment. By a variety of means,
HSBC Finance assesses the customer’s ability to
make the adjusted payment and, as appropriate and
in accordance with defined policies, HSBC Finance
modifies the loans, allowing time for the customer to
seek alternative financing or improve their individual
situation. These loan modifications primarily provide
for temporary interest rate relief for 12 months by
either maintaining the current interest rate for the
entire 12-month period or resetting the interest rate
for the 12-month period to a rate lower than that
originally required at the reset date. At the end of the
12-month period, the interest rate on the loan will
reset in accordance with the original loan terms,
unless the borrower qualifies for, and is granted, a
further modification. In 2007, HSBC Finance made
more than 33,000 outbound contacts and modified
more than 8,500 loans with an aggregate balance of
US$1.4 billion. Since the inception of this
programme, HSBC Finance has made more than
41,000 outbound contacts and modified more than
10,300 loans with an aggregate balance of
US$1.6 billion. These loans are not included in the
figures quoted above, because HSBC Finance has
not reset delinquency on them as they were not
contractually delinquent at the time of the
modification. However, loans which have been
restructured in the past for other reasons are included
in the figures above. HSBC Finance also continues
to manage a Foreclosure Avoidance Programme for
delinquent consumer lending customers designed to
provide relief to qualifying home owners by either
loan restructuring or modification. HSBC Finance
also supports a variety of national and local efforts
in home ownership preservation and foreclosure
avoidance.
Collateral and other credit enhancements
obtained
(Audited)
HSBC obtained assets by taking possession of
collateral held as security, or calling upon other
credit enhancements, as follows:
(Audited)
Nature of assets
Residential property .................
Commercial and industrial
property ................................
Other ........................................
Carrying amount
obtained in:
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2,509
1,716
18
373
6
215
2,900
1,937
Repossessed properties are made available for
sale in an orderly fashion, with the proceeds used to
reduce or repay the outstanding indebtedness. Where
excess funds are available after the debt has been
repaid, they are available either for other secured
lenders with lower priority or are returned to the
customer. HSBC does not generally occupy
repossessed properties for its business use. The
majority of repossessed properties arose in the US in
HSBC Finance, which experienced higher levels of
foreclosure and higher losses on sale due to
declining house prices. The average time taken to
sell a foreclosed property in the US during 2007 was
184 days and the average loss on sale was 11 per
cent. A quarterly breakdown is provided below:
228
(Unaudited)
Quarter ended
31
December
30
September
Number of foreclosed properties at end of period ................
Number of properties added to foreclosed inventory
2007
9,627
in the year/quarter ..............................................................
Average loss on sale of foreclosed properties1 ......................
Average time to sell foreclosed properties (days) .................
18,755
11%
184
2007
9,627
4,957
14%
183
2007
8,809
4,814
9%
186
30
June
2007
9,115
4,540
8%
185
31
March
2007
9,161
4,444
10%
183
1 The average loss on sale of foreclosed properties is calculated as cash proceeds after deducting selling costs and commissions, minus
the book value of the property when it was moved to ‘Real estate owned’, divided by the book value of the property when it was moved to
‘Real estate owned’.
Impairment allowances and charges
Movement in allowance accounts for total loans and advances
(Audited)
Individually
Collectively
assessed
US$m
assessed
US$m
At 1 January 2007 ............................................................................................
Amounts written off ........................................................................................
Recoveries of loans and advances written off in previous years ....................
Charge to income statement ............................................................................
Exchange and other movements ......................................................................
At 31 December 2007 .....................................................................................
At 1 January 2006 ............................................................................................
Amounts written off ........................................................................................
Recoveries of loans and advances written off in previous years ....................
Charge to income statement ............................................................................
Exchange and other movements ......................................................................
At 31 December 2006 ......................................................................................
2,572
(897)
129
796
106
2,706
2,679
(1,023)
128
458
330
2,572
11,013
(11,947)
876
16,381
183
16,506
8,687
(8,450)
651
10,089
36
11,013
Total
US$m
13,585
(12,844)
1,005
17,177
289
19,212
11,366
(9,473)
779
10,547
366
13,585
229
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Impairment allowances and charges
Movement in impairment allowances by industry segment and by geographical region
The following tables show details of the movements
in HSBC’s loan impairment allowances by location
of lending office for each of the past five years.
A discussion of the material movements in the
loan impairment charges by region follows these
tables.
(Audited)
2007
Impairment allowances at 1 January ..................
Amounts written off ...........................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous
years ................................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Charge to income statement1 ..............................
Banks ..............................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Foreign exchange and other movements ............
Impairment allowances at 31 December ............
Europe
US$m
3,683
(2,940)
(371)
(72)
(5)
(90)
(7)
(2,395)
542
14
19
8
33
–
468
2,543
–
353
119
12
(3)
27
7
2,028
110
3,938
Impairment allowances against banks:
– individually assessed ...................................
7
Impairment allowances against customers:
– individually assessed ...................................
– collectively assessed2 ..................................
Impairment allowances at 31 December ............
Impairment allowances against customers
as a percentage of loans and advances to
customers:
– individually assessed ...................................
– collectively assessed ....................................
At 31 December ..................................................
For footnotes, see page 234.
1,846
2,085
3,938
%
0.40
0.46
0.86
Hong
Kong
US$m
365
(251)
(57)
(4)
–
(10)
(8)
(172)
43
5
1
–
1
6
30
212
–
57
(4)
2
–
–
(14)
171
7
376
–
132
244
376
%
0.15
0.27
0.42
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
901
(724)
(94)
(5)
–
(10)
(16)
(599)
124
10
7
1
6
3
97
614
–
82
(21)
1
–
2
16
534
11
926
–
349
577
926
%
0.34
0.56
0.90
North
Latin
America
US$m
America
US$m
7,247
1,389
Total
US$m
13,585
(7,444)
(1,485)
(12,844)
(122)
(14)
(5)
(30)
(878)
(6,395)
62
21
1
2
9
1
28
12,111
–
125
52
21
–
59
1,784
10,070
4
11,980
(253)
(3)
(1)
(28)
(21)
(1,179)
234
24
1
–
5
9
195
1,697
–
280
6
–
–
39
47
1,325
157
1,992
(897)
(98)
(11)
(168)
(930)
(10,740)
1,005
74
29
11
54
19
818
17,177
–
897
152
36
(3)
127
1,840
14,128
289
19,212
–
–
7
119
11,861
11,980
%
253
1,739
1,992
%
2,699
16,506
19,212
%
0.04
3.93
3.97
0.51
3.48
3.99
0.27
1.65
1.92
230
(Audited)
Impairment allowances at 1 January ..................
Amounts written off ...........................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous
years ................................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Charge to income statement1 ..............................
Banks ..............................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Foreign exchange and other movements ............
Impairment allowances at 31 December ............
Europe
US$m
3,499
(2,706)
(454)
(70)
(20)
(116)
(2)
(2,044)
421
25
15
1
24
3
353
2,140
–
246
41
(7)
(13)
23
24
1,826
329
3,683
Impairment allowances against banks:
– individually assessed ...................................
7
Impairment allowances against customers:
– individually assessed ...................................
– collectively assessed2 ..................................
Impairment allowances at 31 December ............
Impairment allowances against customers
as a percentage of loans and advances to
customers:
– individually assessed ...................................
– collectively assessed ....................................
At 31 December ..................................................
For footnotes, see page 234.
1,725
1,951
3,683
%
0.44
0.49
0.93
2006
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
837
(566)
(79)
(8)
(11)
(7)
(7)
(454)
95
11
3
–
2
1
78
512
(1)
(14)
3
(1)
–
(19)
–
544
23
901
–
362
539
901
%
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
Total
US$m
5,349
1,283
11,366
(4,933)
(1,053)
(9,473)
(97)
(21)
(1)
(31)
(595)
(4,188)
85
20
3
10
9
7
36
6,798
–
107
19
(4)
(1)
18
1,039
5,620
(52)
7,247
(96)
(6)
–
(103)
(21)
(827)
(782)
(111)
(39)
(260)
(628)
(7,653)
137
779
27
–
–
19
–
91
940
(2)
124
6
6
(23)
66
29
734
82
88
21
11
54
19
586
10,547
(3)
503
75
(6)
(37)
86
1,096
8,833
366
1,389
13,585
–
–
7
109
7,138
7,247
%
238
1,151
1,389
%
2,565
11,013
13,585
%
Hong
Kong
US$m
398
(215)
(56)
(6)
(7)
(3)
(3)
(140)
41
5
–
–
–
8
28
157
–
40
6
–
–
(2)
4
109
(16)
365
–
131
234
365
%
0.15
0.28
0.43
0.46
0.69
1.15
0.04
2.50
2.54
0.64
3.10
3.74
0.29
1.25
1.54
231
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Impairment allowances and charges / Provisions
Movement in impairment allowances by industry segment and by geographical region (continued)
(Audited)
Impairment allowances at 1 January ..................
Amounts written off ...........................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous
years ................................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Net charge/(release) to income statement1 .........
Banks ..............................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Foreign exchange and other movements ............
Impairment allowances at 31 December ............
Europe
US$m
4,851
(2,804)
(345)
(67)
(3)
(108)
(14)
(2,267)
84
10
5
6
1
62
1,984
(5)
354
59
(14)
4
(21)
5
1,602
(616)
3,499
Impairment allowances against banks:
– individually assessed ...................................
8
Impairment allowances against customers:
– individually assessed ...................................
– collectively assessed2 ..................................
Impairment allowances at 31 December ............
Impairment allowances against customers
as a percentage of loans and advances to
customers:
– individually assessed ...................................
– collectively assessed ....................................
At 31 December ..................................................
For footnotes, see page 234.
1,575
1,916
3,499
%
0.50
0.61
1.11
Hong
Kong
US$m
504
(294)
(157)
(23)
–
–
(2)
(112)
45
4
–
1
9
31
146
–
199
–
(1)
–
(32)
(25)
5
(3)
398
–
173
225
398
%
2005
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
Total
US$m
1,088
12,634
(703)
(9,043)
960
(329)
(79)
(11)
–
(6)
(6)
(227)
82
17
1
2
1
61
136
(2)
(72)
1
–
–
(1)
7
203
(12)
837
1
500
336
837
%
5,231
(4,913)
(81)
(14)
(10)
(14)
(456)
(4,338)
37
2
38
–
69
4,919
–
32
(6)
9
2
(18)
592
4,308
(34)
5,349
146
137
(11)
(2)
–
(66)
(30)
(594)
8
1
42
7
79
675
–
75
2
–
–
46
26
526
86
(673)
(117)
(13)
(194)
(508)
(7,538)
494
76
9
89
18
302
7,860
(7)
588
56
(6)
6
(26)
605
6,644
(579)
1,283
11,366
–
–
9
221
5,128
5,349
%
0.09
1.99
2.08
214
1,069
1,283
%
0.93
4.65
5.58
2,683
8,674
11,366
%
0.36
1.16
1.52
0.21
0.27
0.48
0.71
0.47
1.18
232
Movement in provisions by industry segment and by geographical region
(Unaudited)
Provisions at 1 January .......................................
IFRSs transition adjustment at 1 January ...........
Amounts written off ...........................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous
years ................................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Net charge to profit and loss account3 ................
Banks ..............................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
General provisions ..........................................
Foreign exchange and other movements ............
Provisions at 31 December .................................
Europe
US$m
4,435
(2)
(1,331)
(298)
(30)
(14)
(209)
(10)
(770)
136
27
3
3
5
1
97
1,023
(7)
180
21
18
–
(65)
3
1,035
(162)
551
4,812
Provisions against banks:
– specific provisions .......................................
14
Provisions against customers:
– specific provisions .......................................
– general provisions2 ......................................
Provisions at 31 December .................................
Provisions against customers as a percentage
of loans and advances to customers
– specific provisions .......................................
– general provisions .......................................
At 31 December ..................................................
For footnotes, see page 234.
4,036
762
4,812
%
1.43
0.27
1.70
2004
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
1,181
(21)
(403)
(164)
(17)
(1)
(42)
(8)
(171)
70
4
10
–
14
1
41
102
(1)
52
(28)
(1)
–
(18)
4
142
(48)
14
943
3
785
155
943
%
1.27
0.25
1.52
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
5,665
–
1,379
(1)
Total
US$m
13,715
(58)
(6,125)
(683)
(8,844)
(61)
(3)
(3)
(29)
(463)
(5,566)
504
38
4
–
18
8
436
5,018
–
(9)
(1)
1
1
(21)
494
4,616
(63)
150
5,212
–
4,106
1,106
5,212
%
1.67
0.45
2.12
(65)
(1)
(185)
(28)
(404)
156
39
–
–
45
9
63
272
(2)
12
1
–
–
(35)
(5)
303
(2)
(53)
(623)
(106)
(20)
(498)
(561)
(7,036)
913
118
17
3
85
31
659
6,195
(10)
179
(22)
15
1
(168)
482
6,216
(498)
638
1,070
12,559
–
770
300
1,070
%
4.58
1.79
6.37
17
10,017
2,525
12,559
%
1.46
0.37
1.83
Hong
Kong
US$m
1,055
(34)
(302)
(35)
(55)
(2)
(33)
(52)
(125)
47
10
–
–
3
12
22
(220)
–
(56)
(15)
(3)
–
(29)
(14)
120
(223)
(24)
522
–
320
202
522
%
0.40
0.25
0.65
233
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Provisions / Loan impairment charge
Movement in provisions by industry segment and by geographical region (continued)
(Unaudited)
Provisions at 1 January .......................................
Amounts written off ...........................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Recoveries of amounts written off in previous
years ................................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
Net charge to profit and loss account3 ................
Banks ..............................................................
Commercial, industrial and international
trade ............................................................
Real estate .......................................................
Non-bank financial institutions ......................
Governments ..................................................
Other commercial ...........................................
Residential mortgages ....................................
Other personal ................................................
General Provisions .........................................
Foreign exchange and other movements4 ...........
2003
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
1,496
(445)
(201)
(18)
(21)
(42)
(16)
(147)
74
18
4
5
11
1
35
85
3
(45)
(8)
(17)
1
(4)
23
116
16
(29)
Hong
Kong
US$m
1,143
(584)
(71)
(12)
(13)
(65)
(121)
(302)
42
16
–
–
4
6
16
400
–
(3)
(18)
1
–
78
102
271
(31)
54
Europe
US$m
3,668
(902)
(338)
(31)
(3)
(54)
(4)
(472)
142
25
3
2
49
1
62
874
(6)
286
15
(1)
–
216
–
482
(118)
653
Provisions at 31 December .................................
4,435
1,055
1,181
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
642
2,191
Total
US$m
9,140
(4,469)
(1,056)
(7,456)
(102)
(3)
–
(80)
(292)
(3,992)
330
20
2
4
10
2
292
4,557
–
77
(1)
(5)
–
55
422
3,950
59
4,605
5,665
(304)
(115)
(30)
(54)
(242)
(311)
22
3
–
–
7
3
9
177
–
61
1
(1)
–
(6)
5
164
(47)
45
(1,016)
(179)
(67)
(295)
(675)
(5,224)
610
82
9
11
81
13
414
6,093
(3)
376
(11)
(23)
1
339
552
4,983
(121)
5,328
1,379
13,715
Provisions against banks:
– specific provisions .......................................
20
Provisions against customers:
– specific provisions .......................................
– general provisions3 ......................................
Provisions at 31 December .................................
Provisions against customers as a percentage
of loans and advances to customers
– specific provisions .......................................
– general provisions .......................................
At 31 December ..................................................
3,554
861
4,435
%
1.65
0.40
2.05
–
629
426
4
981
196
1,055
1,181
–
–
24
4,660
1,005
5,665
1,054
325
1,379
10,878
2,813
13,715
%
%
%
%
%
0.84
0.57
1.41
1.99
0.40
2.39
2.47
0.53
3.00
6.97
2.15
9.12
2.00
0.52
2.52
1 See table below ‘Net loan impairment charge to the income statement by geographical region’.
2 Collectively assessed impairment allowances (2004 and 2003: general provisions) are allocated to geographical segments based on the
location of the office booking the provision. Consequently, the general provisions booked in Hong Kong may cover assets booked in
branches located outside Hong Kong, principally in Rest of Asia-Pacific, as well as those booked in Hong Kong.
3 See table below ‘Net charge to the income statement for bad and doubtful debts by geographical region’.
4 Other movements include amounts of US$129 million in Europe and US$4,524 million in North America transferred in on the
acquisition of HSBC Finance Corporation, and of US$116 million in Latin America transferred in on the acquisition of Lloyds TSB
Group’s Brazilian businesses and assets.
234
Net loan impairment charge to the income statement by geographical region
(Unaudited)
Year ended 31 December 2007
Europe
US$m
Hong
Kong
US$m
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
Individually assessed impairment allowances
New allowances ..............................................
Release of allowances no longer required .....
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
Collectively assessed impairment allowances
New allowances net of allowance releases ....
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
Total charge for impairment losses ....................
Banks .............................................................
Customers ......................................................
781
(388)
(38)
355
2,692
(504)
2,188
2,543
–
2,543
%
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage
of closing gross loans and advances ..............
0.45
31 December 2007
Impaired loans ....................................................
Impairment allowances .......................................
Individually assessed impairment allowances
New allowances ..............................................
Release of allowances no longer required .....
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
Collectively assessed impairment allowances
New allowances net of allowance releases ....
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
Total charge for impairment losses ....................
Banks .............................................................
Customers ......................................................
US$m
6,266
3,938
Europe
US$m
715
(439)
(33)
243
2,285
(388)
1,897
2,140
–
2,140
%
103
(32)
(14)
57
184
(29)
155
212
–
212
%
0.14
US$m
433
376
Hong
Kong
US$m
93
(45)
(14)
34
150
(27)
123
157
–
157
%
Total
US$m
1,533
(608)
(129)
796
228
(54)
(26)
148
210
(38)
(19)
153
11,999
1,759
17,257
(36)
(215)
(876)
11,963
12,111
–
12,111
1,544
1,697
–
1,697
16,381
17,177
–
17,177
%
%
%
211
(96)
(32)
83
623
(92)
531
614
–
614
%
0.43
US$m
1,088
926
3.80
2.71
1.39
US$m
US$m
US$m
8,384
11,980
2,145
1,992
18,316
19,212
Year ended 31 December 2006
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
138
(130)
(28)
(20)
599
(67)
532
512
(1)
513
%
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
229
(61)
(39)
129
122
(36)
(14)
72
Total
US$m
1,297
(711)
(128)
458
6,715
991
10,740
(46)
(123)
6,669
6,798
–
6,798
868
940
(2)
942
(651)
10,089
10,547
(3)
10,550
%
%
%
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage
of closing gross loans and advances ..............
0.45
0.12
0.48
2.24
1.89
0.99
31 December 2006
Impaired loans ....................................................
Impairment allowances .......................................
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
5,858
3,683
454
365
1,188
901
4,822
7,247
1,478
1,389
13,800
13,585
235
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Loan impairment charge > 2007
Net loan impairment charge to the income statement by geographical region (continued)
(Unaudited)
Year ended 31 December 2005
Individually assessed impairment allowances
New allowances ..............................................
Release of allowances no longer required .....
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
Collectively assessed impairment allowances
New allowances ..............................................
Release of allowances no longer required .....
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
Total charge for impairment losses ....................
Banks .............................................................
Customers ......................................................
Hong
Kong
US$m
200
(123)
(18)
59
159
(45)
(27)
87
146
–
146
%
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
131
(166)
(34)
(69)
339
(86)
(48)
205
136
(2)
138
%
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
299
(42)
(101)
156
5,072
(264)
56
(19)
(25)
12
842
(67)
(45)
(112)
4,763
4,919
–
4,919
663
675
–
675
Total
US$m
1,715
(998)
(199)
518
8,425
(788)
(295)
7,342
7,860
(7)
7,867
%
%
%
Europe
US$m
1,029
(648)
(21)
360
2,013
(326)
(63)
1,624
1,984
(5)
1,989
%
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage
of closing gross loans and advances ..............
0.55
0.12
0.15
1.83
2.11
0.90
31 December 2005
Impaired loans ....................................................
Impairment allowances .......................................
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
5,081
3,499
506
398
945
837
3,710
5,349
1,226
1,283
11,468
11,366
Net charge to the income statement for bad and doubtful debts by geographical region
(Unaudited)
Specific provisions
New provisions ...............................................
Release of provisions no longer required ......
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
General provisions ..............................................
Total bad and doubtful debt charge ....................
Banks .............................................................
Customers ......................................................
Year ended 31 December 2004
Hong
Kong
US$m
237
(187)
(47)
3
(223)
(220)
–
(220)
%
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
419
(199)
(70)
150
(48)
102
(1)
103
%
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
5,690
(105)
(504)
5,081
(63)
5,018
–
5,018
479
(49)
(156)
274
(2)
272
(2)
274
Total
US$m
8,872
(1,266)
(913)
6,693
(498)
6,195
(10)
6,205
%
%
%
Europe
US$m
2,047
(726)
(136)
1,185
(162)
1,023
(7)
1,030
%
Bad and doubtful debt charge as a percentage
of closing gross loans and advances ..............
0.36
(0.28)
0.17
1.88
1.20
0.91
31 December 2004
Non-performing loans ........................................
Provisions ...........................................................
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
6,039
4,798
696
522
1,160
940
3,555
5,212
977
1,070
12,427
12,542
236
(Unaudited)
Europe
US$m
Hong Kong
US$m
Year ended 31 December 2003
Rest of
Asia-Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
Specific provisions
New provisions ...............................................
Release of provisions no longer required ......
Recoveries of amounts previously written
off ...............................................................
General provisions ..............................................
Total bad and doubtful debt charge ....................
Banks .............................................................
Customers ......................................................
1,485
(351)
(142)
992
(118)
874
(6)
880
%
655
(182)
(42)
431
(31)
400
–
400
%
412
(269)
(74)
69
16
85
3
82
%
4,907
(80)
(329)
4,498
59
4,557
–
4,557
318
(71)
(23)
224
(47)
177
–
177
Total
US$m
7,777
(953)
(610)
6,214
(121)
6,093
(3)
6,096
%
%
%
Bad and doubtful debt charge as a percentage
of closing gross loans and advances ..............
0.41
0.53
0.17
2.33
0.79
1.12
31 December 2003
Non-performing loans ........................................
Provisions ...........................................................
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
US$m
5,701
4,415
1,671
1,055
1,538
1,177
4,889
5,665
1,251
1,379
15,050
13,691
Impairment allowances as a percentage of loans and advances to customers
(Unaudited)
Total impairment allowances to gross lending1
Individually assessed impairment allowances ..................................................................................
Collectively assessed impairment allowances ..................................................................................
1 Net of reverse repo transactions, settlement accounts and stock borrowings.
At 31 December
2007
%
0.28
1.73
2.01
2006
%
0.30
1.28
1.58
Year ended 31 December 2007 compared
with year ended 31 December 2006
(Unaudited)
Loan impairment charges rose by 63 per cent to
US$17.2 billion from US$10.5 billion in 2006. The
commentary that follows is on a constant currency
basis:
New allowances for loan impairment charges
rose by 52 per cent, compared with 2006. Releases
and recoveries of allowances increased by 1 per cent
to US$1.6 billion.
In Europe, new loan impairment charges were
US$3.5 billion, a rise of 8 per cent compared with
2006. This partly reflected growth in commercial
lending, where charges remained low compared with
historical amounts but rose from the exceptionally
low levels experienced in 2005 and 2006. Increased
charges also reflected growth in credit card lending
in Turkey. In the UK, refinements to the
methodology used to calculate roll rate percentages
resulted in a higher charge in the consumer finance
operations in the first half of the year. Excluding
this, loan impairment charges were marginally lower
than in 2006.
Releases and recoveries in Europe were broadly
in line with 2006.
In Hong Kong, new loan impairment charges of
US$287 million were recorded, an increase of 19 per
cent, due to the growth in credit card balances and
new corporate loan charges.
Releases and recoveries in Hong Kong
decreased to US$75 million, primarily in the
corporate sector. This reflected the low level of
allowances added in recent years.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, new loan impairment
charges rose by 10 per cent to US$834 million, with
higher loan impairment charges arising in the
commercial loan books in Thailand and Malaysia.
This was offset by a decline in loan impairment
charges for personal lending, particularly in Taiwan
and Indonesia, where charges returned to more
237
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Loan impairment charge > 2007 / 2006
regular levels after an upsurge in 2006 due to
regulatory changes which affected collection activity
and minimum payments.
With corporate and commercial loan impairment
charges low in recent years, releases and recoveries
decreased by 6 per cent to US$220 million.
New loan impairment charges in North America
rose by 76 per cent to US$12.2 billion, driven by the
continued deterioration in credit quality in the US
consumer finance loan portfolio.
US credit quality deteriorated as mortgage
delinquencies rose, house prices declined,
refinancing credit became less available in the
market and the macroeconomic outlook worsened.
The reasons behind the deterioration in US credit
quality, the effects on the US personal lending
portfolio and actions taken as a result are discussed
in more detail on page 217.
Other factors affecting the rise in US loan
impairment charges included normal seasoning of
the portfolio, a higher proportion of unsecured
personal lending and a return to historical norms
from the unusually low levels of bankruptcy filings
experienced in 2006, following changes enacted to
US bankruptcy law in 2005.
Delinquency rates rose across all parts of the
HSBC Finance personal lending portfolio, with
mortgage services and consumer lending
experiencing significant rises in delinquency which
flowed through subsequent stages through to
foreclosure. As the housing downturn began to have
more effect on the broader economy, delinquency
rates in credit cards and vehicle finance rose in the
final quarter of 2007. A change in product mix in the
cards portfolio towards higher yielding products also
contributed to higher impairment charges as this
segment of the portfolio seasoned.
Releases and recoveries in North America
decreased to US$116 million. In the US consumer
finance business, collection staff increased in all
lending portfolios as part of the response to the
deteriorating credit environment.
In Latin America, new loan impairment
charges rose by 63 per cent to US$2.0 billion. The
most significant increase was registered in Mexico,
reflecting strong growth in balances, normal
portfolio seasoning and a rise in delinquency rates
in credit cards. Charges for commercial lending in
Mexico fell as increased delinquency rates in the
small and medium-sized business portfolios were
offset by impairment allowance releases. Products
with high credit losses were discontinued or
restructured. Loan impairment charges in Brazil rose
238
marginally, due to growth in store loans and credit
cards.
Releases and recoveries in Latin America
increased to US$272 million. In Brazil, credit
models were changed during 2007 to align with
credit behaviour in underlying portfolios.
Year ended 31 December 2006 compared
with year ended 31 December 2005
(Unaudited)
Loan impairment charges increased by
US$2.7 billion, or 34 per cent, compared with 2005.
Acquisitions accounted for US$309 million of the
rise, mainly Metris in the US. On an underlying
basis, the increase was 30 per cent. Personal
Financial Services continued to dominate loan
impairments, representing 94 per cent of the Group’s
charge. On a constant currency basis, the key trends
were as follows.
New allowances for loan impairment charges of
US$12.0 billion increased by 27 per cent compared
with 2005. Releases and recoveries of allowances
were broadly in line with 2005.
In Europe, new loan impairment charges rose
by 9 per cent compared with 2005 to US$3.0 billion.
A challenging credit environment in UK unsecured
lending, which began to deteriorate in the middle of
2005, was the primary cause of the increase,
although this was partly mitigated by continued
benign corporate and commercial impairment
experience. Personal bankruptcies and the use of
IVAs have been on a rising trend since the
introduction of legislation in 2004 that eased filing
requirements, and this was further exacerbated by
the recent active marketing of bankruptcy and IVA
relief through the media by debt advisors.
Additionally, a rise in unemployment, which began
in the middle of 2005, and modest rises in interest
rates added to the strain on some personal customers.
In response, HSBC tightened underwriting controls
in the second half of 2005, reduced its market share
of unsecured personal lending and changed the
product mix of new business towards lower-risk
customers. In 2006, there were early signs of
improvement in more recent unsecured lending. New
loan impairment charges also rose in Turkey, by
30 per cent, mainly due to growth in unsecured
credit card and personal lending as overall credit
quality remained stable. In France, new charges fell,
reflecting a stable credit environment and the
reduction in charges following the sale of a
consumer finance business in the second half of
2005.
Releases and recoveries in Europe of
US$860 million were 17 per cent higher than in
2005. Increases in the UK were partially offset by a
decline in France. In the UK, increased resources
deployed on collection activities, combined with a
rise in sales of delinquent debt, were reflected in
significantly higher recoveries. The non-recurrence
of several significant recoveries in 2005 led to a
large fall in France.
In Hong Kong, new loan impairment charges
declined by 22 per cent to US$243 million,
reflecting the non-recurrence of an individual charge
in 2005 for a large commercial customer. This was
partly offset by a rise in credit card impairments as a
result of a rise in balances. Overall, credit quality
remained stable as strong economic growth and low
levels of unemployment continued.
Releases and recoveries fell by 49 per cent to
US$86 million, again mainly as a result of fewer
individual impairment releases in the corporate and
commercial sector and the non-recurrence of
mortgage lending recoveries in 2005, following
improvement in the property market since 2004.
In Rest of Asia-Pacific, there was an 88 per
cent rise in new impairment allowances to
US$737 million. This was an improvement on the
situation in the first half of 2006, when new
impairment charges were 111 per cent higher than in
the first half of 2005. The year-on-year increase was
largely due to Taiwan and, to a lesser extent,
Indonesia. During the first half of 2006, new
government regulations placing restrictions on
collection activity, combined with the popularity of
renegotiation schemes offering the opportunity to
waive interest and postpone principal payments, led
to a sharp rise in credit card defaults, for which a
full-year charge of US$200 million was recorded. In
the second half of 2006, this problem had begun to
moderate and new impairment charges were 31 per
cent lower than in the first half. In Indonesia,
increased loan impairment charges in the personal
sector reflected legislation which introduced higher
minimum payment rules and a reduction in fuel
subsidies. There were further rises in the Middle
East, largely due to loan growth. Elsewhere in the
region, credit quality was stable.
Releases and recoveries in the region fell by
11 per cent to US$225 million. The fall was mainly
in Malaysia and was partly offset by a rise in
commercial releases and recoveries in the Middle
East.
In North America, new loan impairment
charges rose by 36 per cent. Excluding Metris,
new charges increased by 30 per cent. Credit
239
deterioration, mainly in second lien, some portions
of first lien and adjustable-rate mortgages acquired
from third party correspondents through HSBC’s
mortgage services business, were the primary cause
of the rise in new charges. As the housing market in
the US slowed through 2006 and interest rates rose,
delinquency trends on both second lien and portions
of first lien mortgages originated in 2005 and 2006
were higher than for loans made in previous years. In
addition, the extra payment obligations arising from
the repricing of adjustable-rate mortgages to higher
rates added to the assessed impairment of the
correspondent portfolio, in particular in respect of
second lien mortgages ranking behind adjustable-
rate first lien mortgages.
As interest rate adjustments will be occurring in
an environment of lower home value appreciation
and tightening credit, it is estimated that the
probability of default on adjustable-rate first
mortgages subject to repricing, and on any second
lien mortgage loans that are subordinate to an
adjustable-rate first lien, will be greater than has
been experienced in the past. As a result, loan
impairment charges relating to the mortgage services
portfolio have increased significantly.
In the second half of 2006, HSBC took action to
tighten credit criteria in the mortgage services
operation as detailed on page 217. As a consequence,
balances in mortgage services declined compared
with 30 June 2006.
Notwithstanding the credit weakness witnessed
in the mortgage services business, credit delinquency
in the majority of the other portfolios, including
mortgage balances originated through the branch-
based consumer lending business, rose modestly,
driven by portfolio ageing and an increased
proportion of credit card loans following the Metris
acquisition. Partially offsetting factors included the
effects of a decline in bankruptcy filings, especially
in the first half of 2006 following the spike in the
fourth quarter of 2005, low unemployment and the
non-recurrence of charges relating to hurricane
Katrina.
HSBC in the US closely monitors the two-
month-and-over contractual delinquency ratio (being
the ratio of two or more months delinquent accounts
to gross loans and advances), as management views
this as an important indicator of future write-offs.
Details are disclosed below. The rise in the total ratio
was chiefly as a result of the mortgage services
business.
The increase in the US was partly offset by a
small decline in new loan impairment charges in
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Loan impairment charge / HSBC Holdings / Risk elements
Canada, as the strong economy continued to
underpin good credit quality.
Releases and recoveries in North America
decreased by 23 per cent to US$146 million due to
the non-recurrence of recoveries in the US.
In Latin America, new impairment charges
rose by 24 per cent to US$1.1 billion in 2006. This
increase was chiefly attributable to Mexico and, to a
lesser extent, Brazil. Strong growth in personal and
commercial lending in Mexico resulted in higher
new charges. In Brazil, new charges rose by 11 per
cent, a significant reduction from the 52 per cent rise
reported in 2005, as credit quality improved
following enhancements made to underwriting
procedures during 2005 and 2006.
Latin American releases and recoveries went up
by 7 per cent, largely in Mexico as a result of more
stable political and economic conditions.
Charge for impairment losses as a percentage of average gross loans and advances to customers
(Unaudited)
Europe
%
Hong Kong
%
Rest of
Asia-Pacific
%
North
America
Latin
America
%
%
Year ended 31 December 2007
New allowances net of allowance releases ........
Recoveries ..........................................................
Total charge for impairment losses ....................
Amount written off net of recoveries .................
Year ended 31 December 2006
New allowances net of allowance releases ........
Recoveries ..........................................................
Total charge for impairment losses ....................
Amount written off net of recoveries .................
Year ended 31 December 2005
New allowances net of allowance releases ........
Recoveries ..........................................................
Total charge for impairment losses ....................
Amount written off net of recoveries .................
Year ended 31 December 2004
New provisions ...................................................
Releases and recoveries ......................................
Net charge for specific provisions ......................
Total provisions charged ....................................
Amount written off net of recoveries .................
0.86
(0.15)
0.71
0.67
0.87
(0.14)
0.73
0.77
0.76
(0.03)
0.73
1.00
0.78
(0.33)
0.45
0.39
0.46
0.29
(0.05)
0.24
0.23
0.23
(0.05)
0.18
0.20
0.24
(0.06)
0.18
0.31
0.31
(0.30)
0.01
(0.29)
0.33
0.83
(0.14)
0.69
0.67
0.80
(0.13)
0.67
0.62
0.33
(0.13)
0.20
0.37
0.77
(0.49)
0.28
0.19
0.61
Year ended 31 December 2003
New provisions ...................................................
Releases and recoveries ......................................
0.76
(0.25)
0.89
(0.30)
0.96
(0.80)
Net charge for specific provisions ......................
Total provisions charged ....................................
Amount written off net of recoveries .................
0.51
0.45
0.39
0.59
0.54
0.73
0.16
0.20
0.86
4.20
(0.02)
4.18
2.55
2.52
(0.03)
2.49
1.77
2.15
(0.07)
2.08
2.02
2.61
(0.28)
2.33
2.31
2.57
3.06
(0.25)
2.81
2.84
2.58
4.55
(0.55)
4.00
2.95
3.95
(0.50)
3.45
3.36
3.97
(0.68)
3.29
2.77
3.09
(1.32)
1.77
1.64
3.41
2.22
(0.65)
1.57
1.23
7.20
Total
%
2.09
(0.12)
1.97
1.36
1.49
(0.10)
1.39
1.15
1.25
(0.09)
1.16
1.26
1.41
(0.35)
1.06
0.99
1.26
1.60
(0.32)
1.28
1.25
1.40
HSBC Holdings
(Audited)
Credit risk arises in HSBC Holdings primarily as a
result of transactions with Group subsidiaries as well
as guarantees issued in support of obligations
incurred by some Group businesses in the normal
conduct of their business.
These risks are reviewed and managed, within
regulatory and internal limits for exposures, by the
HSBC Group Risk function, which provides high-
level, centralised oversight and management of
HSBC’s credit risks world-wide, reporting to the
Group Chief Risk Officer.
No collateral or other credit enhancements were
held by HSBC Holdings in respect of its transactions
with subsidiary undertakings.
240
HSBC Holdings’ maximum exposure to credit
risk at 31 December 2007 is shown below. HSBC
Holdings’ financial assets represent claims on Group
subsidiaries, principally located in Europe and North
America.
2007
Off-balance
sheet
exposure
US$m
Carrying
value
US$m
Maximum
exposure
US$m
2006 (restated)1
Off-balance
sheet
Carrying
value
US$m
exposure
US$m
Maximum
exposure
US$m
Derivatives ..........................................................
Loans and advances to HSBC
undertakings ...................................................
Financial investments .........................................
Guarantees ..........................................................
2,660
17,242
3,022
–
22,924
–
2,660
1,599
–
1,599
3,638
–
38,457
42,095
20,880
3,022
38,457
65,019
14,456
3,614
–
19,669
3,967
–
17,605
21,572
18,423
3,614
17,605
41,241
1 Comparative figures have been restated to include US$298 million of available-for-sale assets within the total for financial investments
held by HSBC Holdings.
All of the derivative transactions are with HSBC
Troubled debt restructurings increased by 54 per
undertakings which are banking counterparties
(2006: 100 per cent).
The credit quality of loans and advances to
HSBC undertakings is assessed as satisfactory risk,
with 100 per cent of the exposure being neither past
due nor impaired (2006: 100 per cent).
The long-term debt rating of issuers of financial
investments is within the Standard & Poor’s ratings
range of AA– to AA+ (2006: AA– to AA+).
Risk elements in the loan portfolio
(This section all unaudited)
The disclosure of credit risk elements under the
following headings reflects US accounting practice
and classifications for publicly traded bank holding
companies:
•
•
•
loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis;
accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or
more as to interest or principal; and
troubled debt restructurings not included in the
above.
Troubled debt restructurings
The SEC requires separate disclosure of any loans
whose terms have been modified because of
problems with the borrower to grant concessions
other than are warranted by market conditions. These
are classified as ‘troubled debt restructurings’ and
are distinct from the normal restructure activities in
personal loan portfolios described in ‘Renegotiated
loans’ on page 227. Disclosure of troubled debt
restructurings may be discontinued after the first
year if the debt performs in accordance with the new
terms.
cent in 2007, reflecting measures taken to mitigate
risk in the US consumer finance business in response
to the deterioration in mortgage loans.
Unimpaired loans past due 90 days or more
Unimpaired loans contractually past due 90 days or
more increased by 11 per cent. The rise was largely
attributable to the US consumer finance business,
where credit quality deteriorated throughout the
year. The rise in overdue balances on credit cards in
Mexico also contributed.
Impaired loans
In accordance with IFRSs, HSBC recognises interest
income on assets after they have been written down
as a result of an impairment loss. In the following
tables, HSBC represents information on its impaired
loans and advances which are designated in
accordance with the policy described above.
Potential problem loans
Credit risk elements also cover potential problem
loans. These are loans where information on
possible credit problems among borrowers causes
management to seriously doubt their ability to
comply with the loan repayment terms. There are no
potential problem loans other than those identified in
the table of risk elements set out below, and as
discussed in ‘Areas of special interest’ above,
including ARMs and stated-income products.
Risk elements
The following table provides an analysis of risk
elements in the loan portfolios at 31 December for
the past five years:
241
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Credit risk > Risk elements / Liquidity and funding > Policies / Primary sources of funding
Impaired loans
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
Troubled debt restructurings
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
Unimpaired loans contractually
past due 90 days or more as to
principal or interest
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
Trading loans classified as
grades 6 and 7
2007
US$m
6,266
433
1,088
8,384
2,145
2006
US$m
5,858
454
1,188
4,822
1,478
At 31 December
2005
US$m
5,081
506
945
3,710
1,226
2004
US$m
6,053
696
1,172
3,600
932
2003
US$m
5,680
1,670
1,519
4,177
1,170
18,316
13,800
11,468
12,453
14,216
648
146
34
3,322
848
4,998
202
49
156
1,302
421
2,130
360
189
73
1,712
915
3,249
237
79
78
1,364
165
1,923
239
198
121
1,417
878
2,853
592
74
40
924
4
1,634
213
436
56
1,600
830
3,135
68
67
56
1,171
–
1,362
335
571
68
1,569
1,041
3,584
34
205
45
1,252
2
1,538
North America ............................................
675
127
11
–
–
Risk elements on loans
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
Assets held for resale
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
Total risk elements
Europe .........................................................
Hong Kong .................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ....................................
North America ............................................
Latin America .............................................
7,116
628
1,278
13,683
3,414
26,119
59
29
7
1,172
101
1,368
7,175
657
1,285
14,855
3,515
27,487
6,455
722
1,339
8,025
2,558
5,912
778
1,106
6,062
2,108
6,334
1,199
1,284
6,371
1,762
6,049
2,446
1,632
6,998
2,213
19,099
15,966
16,950
19,338
30
42
17
999
91
1,179
6,485
764
1,356
9,024
2,649
205
49
31
582
103
970
6,117
827
1,137
6,644
2,211
27
75
21
664
44
831
6,361
1,274
1,305
7,035
1,806
32
2
30
720
74
858
6,081
2,448
1,662
7,718
2,287
20,278
16,936
17,781
20,196
Loan impairment allowances as a
percentage of risk elements on loans1 ....
%
%
%
%
75.5
71.6
71.2
74.1
%
70.9
1 Ratio excludes trading loans classified as grades 6 and 7.
242
Liquidity and funding management
(Audited)
Liquidity risk is the risk that HSBC does not have
sufficient financial resources to meet its obligations
as they fall due, or will have to do so at an excessive
cost. This risk arises from mismatches in the timing
of cash flows. Funding risk (a form of liquidity risk)
arises when the necessary liquidity to fund illiquid
asset positions cannot be obtained at the expected
terms and when required.
The objective of HSBC’s liquidity and funding
management is to ensure that all foreseeable funding
commitments, including deposit withdrawals, can be
met when due, and that access to the wholesale
markets is co-ordinated and cost-effective. It is
HSBC’s objective to maintain a diversified and
stable funding base comprising core retail and
corporate customer deposits and institutional
balances. This is augmented by wholesale funding
and maintaining portfolios of highly liquid assets
which are diversified by currency and maturity, with
the objective of enabling HSBC to respond quickly
and smoothly to unforeseen liquidity requirements.
HSBC requires its operating entities to maintain
a strong liquidity position and to manage the
liquidity profile of their assets, liabilities and
commitments with the objective of ensuring that
cash flows are appropriately balanced and all
obligations can be met when due.
Policies and procedures
(Audited)
The management of liquidity and funding is
primarily carried out locally in the operating entities
of HSBC in accordance with practices and limits set
by the Group Management Board. These limits vary
by entity to take account of the depth and liquidity of
the market in which the entity operates. It is HSBC’s
general policy that each banking entity should be
self-sufficient with regards to funding its own
operations. Exceptions are permitted to facilitate the
efficient funding of certain short-term treasury
requirements and start-up operations or branches
which do not have access to local deposit markets,
all of which are funded under clearly defined internal
and regulatory guidelines and limits from HSBC’s
largest banking operations. These internal and
regulatory limits and guidelines serve to place
formal limitations on the transfer of resources
between HSBC entities and are necessary to reflect
the broad range of currencies, markets and time
zones within which HSBC operates.
The Group’s liquidity and funding management
process includes:
•
projecting cash flows by major currency under
various stress scenarios and considering the
level of liquid assets necessary in relation
thereto;
• monitoring balance sheet liquidity ratios against
internal and regulatory requirements;
• maintaining a diverse range of funding sources
with adequate back-up facilities;
• managing the concentration and profile of debt
maturities;
• managing contingent liquidity commitment
exposures within pre-determined caps;
• maintaining debt financing plans;
• monitoring depositor concentration in order to
avoid undue reliance on large individual
depositors and ensuring a satisfactory overall
funding mix; and
• maintaining liquidity and funding contingency
plans. These plans identify early indicators of
stress conditions and describe actions to be
taken in the event of difficulties arising from
systemic or other crises, while minimising
adverse long-term implications for the business.
Primary sources of funding
(Audited)
Current accounts and savings deposits payable on
demand or at short notice form a significant part of
HSBC’s funding. HSBC places considerable
importance on maintaining the stability of these
deposits.
The stability of deposits, which are a primary
source of funding, depends upon preserving
depositor confidence in HSBC’s capital strength and
liquidity, and on competitive and transparent
deposit-pricing strategies.
HSBC also accesses professional markets in
order to provide funding for non-banking
subsidiaries that do not accept deposits, to maintain a
presence in local money markets and to optimise the
funding of asset maturities not naturally matched by
core deposit funding. In aggregate, HSBC’s banking
entities are liquidity providers to the inter-bank
market, placing significantly more funds with other
banks than they themselves borrow.
The main operating subsidiary that does not
accept deposits is HSBC Finance, which funds itself
principally by taking term funding in the
professional markets and by securitising assets.
243
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Liquidity and funding > Primary sources of funding
At 31 December 2007, US$142 billion (2006:
US$150 billion) of HSBC Finance’s liabilities
were drawn from professional markets, utilising a
range of products, maturities and currencies to avoid
undue reliance on any particular funding source.
Cash flows payable by HSBC under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
Deposits by banks .........................................................
Customer accounts ........................................................
Trading liabilities ..........................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Debt securities in issue .................................................
Subordinated liabilities .................................................
Other financial liabilities ..............................................
Loan commitments .......................................................
At 31 December 2006
Deposits by banks .........................................................
Customer accounts ........................................................
Trading liabilities ..........................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Debt securities in issue .................................................
Subordinated liabilities .................................................
Other financial liabilities ..............................................
Loan commitments .......................................................
On
demand
US$m
42,793
629,227
314,580
11,730
181,009
635
3
20,516
1,200,493
312,146
1,512,639
29,609
535,695
226,608
8,990
99,790
919
–
14,809
916,420
321,075
1,237,495
The balances in the above table will not agree
directly to the balances in the consolidated balance
sheet as the table incorporates all cash flows, on
an undiscounted basis, relating to both principal
and those associated with all future coupon
payments (except for trading liabilities and trading
derivatives). Furthermore, loan commitments are
generally not recognised on the balance sheet.
Trading liabilities and trading derivatives have been
included in the ‘On demand’ time bucket, and not
by contractual maturity, because trading liabilities
are typically held for short periods of time. The
undiscounted cash flows on hedging derivative
liabilities are classified according to their
contractual maturity.
Cash flows payable in respect of customer
accounts are primarily contractually repayable on
demand or at short notice. However, in practice,
short-term deposit balances remain stable as inflows
and outflows broadly match.
244
Due
within 3
months
US$m
Due
between
3 and 12
months
US$m
Due
between
1 and 5
years
US$m
78,429
391,659
–
2,083
113
90,718
277
29,812
593,091
155,142
748,233
55,239
301,847
–
1,103
671
80,288
285
34,838
474,271
144,382
618,653
11,445
56,294
–
8,286
873
59,626
1,951
5,177
143,652
155,565
299,217
8,462
47,560
–
2,855
884
38,831
1,296
1,094
100,982
125,141
226,123
4,208
29,445
–
43,147
1,663
109,054
10,181
977
198,675
113,072
311,747
6,356
25,155
–
36,194
1,337
102,069
11,221
206
182,538
89,306
271,844
Due
after 5
years
US$m
5,199
6,614
–
68,726
613
38,782
34,841
1,273
156,048
28,532
184,580
4,893
5,420
–
52,222
167
51,171
30,764
711
145,348
34,726
180,074
Advances to deposits ratio
(Audited)
HSBC emphasises the importance of current
accounts and savings accounts as a source of funds
to finance lending to customers, and discourages
reliance on short-term professional funding. To
achieve this goal, limits are placed on Group
banking entities which restrict their ability to grow
loans to customers without corresponding growth in
core current accounts and savings accounts. This
measure is referred to as the ‘advances to deposits’
ratio.
Advances to deposits ratio limits are set by the
RMM and monitored by Group Finance. The ratio
compares loans and advances to customers as a
percentage of core customer current and savings
accounts together with term funding with a
remaining term to maturity in excess of one year.
Loans to customers which are part of reverse
repurchase arrangements, and where the Group
receives securities which are deemed to be liquid,
are excluded from the advances to deposits ratio.
Current accounts and savings accounts from
customers deemed to be ‘professional’ are excluded.
The definition of a professional customer takes
account of the size of the customer’s total deposit
balances by applying a tiering classification.
Generally, any customer with total funds deposited
in excess of US$2 million is regarded as
professional. Due to the distinction between core and
professional depositors, the Group’s measure of
advances to deposits will be more restrictive than
that which could be inferred from the published
financial statements.
The advances to deposits ratios of the Group’s
principal banking entities
(Audited)
Year ended 31 December
HSBC Bank
(UK operations)
Year-end ...........................
Maximum ........................
Minimum .........................
Average ............................
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation
Year-end ...........................
Maximum ........................
Minimum .........................
Average ............................
HSBC Bank USA
Year-end ...........................
Maximum ........................
Minimum .........................
Average ............................
Total of Group’s other
principal banking
entities
Year-end ...........................
Maximum ........................
Minimum .........................
Average ............................
2007
%
97.5
101.7
92.6
97.1
76.7
82.2
72.4
76.4
114.9
116.8
107.0
112.7
88.4
89.3
86.2
87.7
2006
%
100.7
104.3
98.1
102.0
72.4
77.8
72.4
75.5
116.8
132.3
115.8
121.4
87.5
91.6
87.5
88.8
The three major Group banking entities shown
separately in the table above represented 71 per cent
of the Group’s total core deposits at 31 December
2007 (2006: 73 per cent). The table demonstrates
that loans to customers in the Group’s principal
banking entities are broadly financed by reliable and
stable sources of funding.
HSBC would meet any unexpected net cash
outflows by selling securities and accessing
additional funding sources such as interbank or
collateralised lending markets. In addition to the
advances to deposits ratio, the Group uses a range of
other measures for managing liquidity risk. These
other measures include the ratio of net liquid assets
to customer liabilities and projected cash flow
scenario analyses.
Ratio of net liquid assets to customer
liabilities
(Audited)
Net liquid assets are liquid assets less all funds
maturing in the next 30 days from wholesale market
sources and from customers who are deemed to be
professional. The Group defines liquid assets for the
purposes of the liquidity ratio as cash balances,
short-term interbank deposits and highly rated debt
securities available for immediate sale and for which
a deep and liquid market exists. As noted above, the
definition of a professional customer takes account
of the size of the customer’s total deposits.
Contingent liquidity risk associated with committed
loan facilities is not reflected in the ratios. The
Group’s framework for monitoring this risk is
outlined below.
Limits for the ratio of net liquid assets to
customer liabilities are set for each bank operating
entity. As HSBC Finance does not accept customer
deposits, it is not appropriate to manage their
liquidity using the standard liquidity ratios. The
liquidity and funding risk framework of HSBC
Finance is discussed below.
Ratios of net liquid assets to customer liabilities
are provided in the following table. For additional
information, the US dollar equivalents of net liquid
assets are also provided.
245
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Liquidity and funding > Primary sources of funding / HSBC Holdings
Ratio of net liquid assets to customer liabilities and net liquid assets
(Audited)
Year ended 31 December
2007
Year ended 31 December
2006
Ratio
%
Net liquid
assets
US$bn
12.1
21.5
12.1
15.6
21.8
24.1
16.1
20.8
15.8
25.7
15.8
21.3
21.0
26.1
21.0
24.0
44.2
80.6
39.9
52.4
53.9
56.9
35.3
48.2
17.1
26.1
17.1
22.0
66.1
72.7
58.8
65.3
Ratio
%
16.3
19.1
12.8
15.1
21.4
21.4
14.2
17.5
22.7
25.5
19.1
23.7
24.5
25.6
20.8
22.9
Net liquid
assets
US$bn
48.7
50.1
32.9
40.1
46.7
46.7
28.4
36.1
22.5
25.5
17.8
23.1
59.4
61.3
43.9
51.7
available and the concentration risk from large
depositors. Compliance with entity level limits is
monitored centrally by Group Finance and reported
regularly to the RMM.
HSBC Finance
As HSBC Finance does not accept customer
deposits, it takes funding from the professional
markets. HSBC Finance uses a range of measures to
monitor funding risk, including projected cash flow
scenario analysis and placing caps on the amount of
unsecured term funding that can mature in any
rolling three-month and rolling 12-month periods.
HSBC Finance also maintains access to committed
sources of secured funding and has in place
committed backstop lines for short-term refinancing
CP programmes. At 31 December 2007, the
maximum amounts of unsecured term funding
maturing in any rolling three-month and rolling
12-month periods were US$6.2 billion and
US$17.7 billion, respectively (2006: US$6.1 billion
and US$16.0 billion). At 31 December 2007, HSBC
Finance also had in place unused committed sources
of secured funding, for which eligible assets were
held, of US$6.2 billion (2006: US$9.0 billion) and
committed backstop lines from non-Group entities in
support of CP programmes totalling US$9.3 billion
(2006: US$9.3 billion).
HSBC Bank (UK operations)
Year-end ..............................................................................................
Maximum ...........................................................................................
Minimum ............................................................................................
Average ...............................................................................................
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Year-end ..............................................................................................
Maximum ...........................................................................................
Minimum ............................................................................................
Average ...............................................................................................
HSBC Bank USA
Year-end ..............................................................................................
Maximum ...........................................................................................
Minimum ............................................................................................
Average ...............................................................................................
Total of Group’s other principal banking entities
Year-end ..............................................................................................
Maximum ...........................................................................................
Minimum ............................................................................................
Average ...............................................................................................
The ‘Total of Group’s other principal banking
entities’ reflects the other main banking subsidiaries
and, as such, includes businesses spread across a
range of locations, in many of which the Group may
require a higher ratio of net liquid assets to customer
liabilities to reflect local market conditions.
Projected cash flow scenario analysis
(Audited)
The Group uses a number of standard projected cash
flow scenarios which are designed to model both
Group-specific and market-wide liquidity crises.
The scenarios vary the rate and timing of deposit
withdrawals and drawdowns on committed lending
facilities, and restrict access to interbank funding,
term debt markets and the ability to generate funds
from asset portfolios. The scenarios are modelled by
all Group banking entities and by HSBC Finance.
The assumptions for each scenario are regularly
reviewed for appropriateness. In addition to the
Group’s standard projected cash flow scenarios,
individual entities are required to design their own
scenarios tailored to reflect specific local market
conditions, products and funding bases.
Limits for cumulative net cash flows under
stress scenarios are set for each banking entity and
for HSBC Finance.
Both ratio and cash flow limits reflect the local
market place, the diversity of funding sources
246
The deterioration of the US sub-prime credit
market has reduced the willingness of financial
institutions to provide committed financing to
entities with exposures to the US sub-prime market,
such as HSBC Finance. HSBC Finance continues to
have access to term funding markets, although the
price of this funding has increased to reflect the
downturn in credit markets. Funding plans are in
place to enable HSBC Finance to deal with
continued stress in the credit markets.
Contingent liquidity risk
(Audited)
In the normal course of its business, the Group
provides committed facilities to customers; these
facilities include committed backstop lines to
conduit vehicles sponsored by the Group. The
liquidity risk consequences of drawdowns on these
committed loan facilities provided by Group entities
are reflected in projected cash flow scenario
analyses, in which the level of drawdown is varied
under different stress scenarios. The Group also sets
total notional limits by Group entity for non-
cancellable contingent funding commitments. The
limits are set by the RMM after due consideration of
the entity’s ability to fund the commitments. The
limits are split according to the borrower, the
liquidity of the underlying assets and the size of the
committed line.
The Group’s contractual exposures as at 31 December monitored under the contingent liquidity risk
limit structure
(Audited)
HSBC Bank
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
HSBC Bank USA
HSBC Bank Canada
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking
Corporation
2007
US$bn
2006
US$bn
Conduits
Client-originated assets1
– total lines ....................
– largest individual lines
HSBC-managed assets2 ...
Other conduits ..................
Single-issuer liquidity
facilities
– five largest3 .................
– largest market sector4 .
9.0
1.6
25.7
–
6.0
1.5
25.8
–
10.0
11.7
10.9
9.5
9.7
0.9
–
2.6
5.9
4.2
9.0
1.0
–
3.3
4.2
5.2
–
–
–
2.5
–
–
–
–
–
2.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1.3
2.3
1.3
2.8
1 These vehicles provide funding to Group customers by issuing debt secured by a diversified pool of customer-originated assets.
2 These vehicles issue debt secured by highly rated asset-backed securities which are managed by HSBC. All of the exposures shown in the
table under this category related to Solitaire.
3 These figures represent the five largest committed liquidity facilities provided to customers other than those facilities to conduits.
4 These figures represent the total of all committed liquidity facilities provided to the largest market sector.
The Group recognises that, in times of market
stress, it may choose to provide non-contractual
liquidity support to certain HSBC-sponsored
vehicles or HSBC-promoted products. Such potential
support would not be included in the Group’s
liquidity risk measures until such time as the support
becomes legally binding, and would only be
provided after careful consideration of the potential
funding requirement and the impact on the entity’s
overall levels of liquidity.
In the second half of 2007, HSBC provided
additional funding to two SIVs sponsored by the
Group (Cullinan and Asscher) in the form of repos,
CP purchases and the acquisition of assets at fair
value from Cullinan. In November 2007, HSBC
announced its intention to provide investors in
Cullinan and Asscher with the option to exchange
their capital notes for notes issued by one or more
new SPEs, with term funding and liquidity to be
provided by HSBC. For further information on these
SIVs, see ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and
special purpose entities’ on page 183.
HSBC Holdings
(Audited)
HSBC Holdings’ primary sources of cash are interest
and capital receipts from its subsidiaries, which it
deploys in short-term bank deposits or liquidity
funds. HSBC Holdings’ primary uses of cash are
investments in subsidiaries, interest payments to debt
holders and dividend payments to shareholders. On
an ongoing basis, HSBC Holdings replenishes its
liquid resources through the receipt of interest on,
and repayment of, intra-group loans, from dividends
paid by subsidiaries and from interest earned on its
own liquid funds. The ability of its subsidiaries to
pay dividends or advance monies to HSBC Holdings
depends, among other things, on their respective
247
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Liquidity and funding > HSBC Holdings / Market risk management > VAR
regulatory capital requirements, statutory reserves,
and financial and operating performance.
HSBC actively manages the cash flows from its
subsidiaries to optimise the amount of cash held at
the holding company level, and expects to continue
doing so in the future. The wide range of HSBC’s
activities means that HSBC Holdings is not
dependent on a single source of profits to fund
its dividends. HSBC Holdings is also subject to
contingent liquidity risk by virtue of loan
commitments and guarantees given. Such
commitments are only provided after due
consideration of HSBC Holdings’ ability to finance
these commitments and the likelihood of the need
arising. Together with its accumulated liquid assets,
HSBC Holdings believes that planned dividends
and interest from subsidiaries will enable it to
meet anticipated cash obligations. Also, in usual
circumstances, HSBC Holdings has full access
to capital markets on normal terms.
Cash flows payable by HSBC Holdings under financial liabilities by remaining contractual maturities
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ...................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ............
Derivatives ...............................................................
Subordinated liabilities ............................................
Other financial liabilities .........................................
Loan commitments ..................................................
At 31 December 2006
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ...................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ............
Derivatives ...............................................................
Subordinated liabilities ............................................
Other financial liabilities .........................................
Loan commitments ..................................................
On
demand
US$m
Due
within 3
months
US$m
Due
between
3 and 12
months
US$m
Due
between
1 and 5
years
US$m
–
–
44
–
–
44
3,638
3,682
109
–
177
–
13
299
3,967
4,266
109
258
–
160
1,398
1,925
–
1,925
221
177
–
158
1,608
2,164
–
2,164
1,801
776
–
482
–
3,059
–
3,059
88
532
–
473
–
1,093
–
1,093
1,192
8,152
–
2,568
–
11,912
–
11,912
3,025
4,039
–
2,525
–
9,589
–
9,589
Due
after 5
years
US$m
–
28,639
–
23,069
–
51,708
–
51,708
5
21,029
–
23,327
8
44,369
–
44,369
At 31 December 2007, the short-term liabilities
of HSBC Holdings totalled US$3.3 billion (2006:
US$1.8 billion), including US$1.4 billion in
respect of the third interim dividend for 2007
(2006: US$1.5 billion) which was paid on
16 January 2008. Short-term assets of US$8.1 billion
(2006: US$7.6 billion) consisted mainly of cash at
bank of US$360 million (2006: US$729 million)
and loans and advances to HSBC undertakings of
US$7.4 billion (2006: US$6.9 billion). Derivatives
have been included in the ‘On demand’ time bucket,
and not by contractual maturity. The undiscounted
cash flows on hedging derivative liabilities are
classified according to their contractual maturity.
Market risk management
(Audited)
The objective of HSBC’s market risk management is
to manage and control market risk exposures in order
to optimise return on risk while maintaining a market
profile consistent with the Group’s status as one of
the world’s largest banking and financial services
organisations.
Market risk is the risk that movements in market
risk factors, including foreign exchange rates and
commodity prices, interest rates, credit spreads and
equity prices will reduce HSBC’s income or the
value of its portfolios.
HSBC separates exposures to market risk into
trading and non-trading portfolios. Trading portfolios
include those positions arising from market-making,
proprietary position-taking and other marked-to-
market positions so designated.
248
Non-trading portfolios include positions that
arise from the interest rate management of HSBC’s
retail and commercial banking assets and liabilities,
financial investments designated as available for sale
and held to maturity, and exposures arising from
HSBC’s insurance operations.
Market risk arising in HSBC’s insurance
businesses is discussed in ‘Risk management of
insurance operations’ on pages 272 to 275.
The management of market risk is principally
undertaken in Global Markets using risk limits
approved by the Group Management Board. Limits
are set for portfolios, products and risk types, with
market liquidity being a principal factor in
determining the level of limits set. Traded Credit and
Market Risk, an independent unit within the Group
Management Office, develops the Group’s market
risk management policies and measurement
techniques. Each major operating entity has an
independent market risk management and control
function which is responsible for measuring market
risk exposures in accordance with the policies
defined by Traded Credit and Market Risk, and
monitoring and reporting these exposures against the
prescribed limits on a daily basis.
Each operating entity is required to assess the
market risks which arise on each product in its
business and to transfer these risks to either its local
Global Markets unit for management, or to separate
books managed under the supervision of the local
Asset and Liability Management Committee
(‘ALCO’). The aim is to ensure that all market risks
are consolidated within operations which have the
necessary skills, tools, management and governance
to manage such risks professionally. In certain cases
where the market risks cannot be adequately
captured by the transfer process, simulation
modelling is used to identify the impact of varying
scenarios on valuations and net interest income.
HSBC uses a range of tools to monitor and limit
market risk exposures. These include value at risk
(‘VAR’), sensitivity analysis and stress testing. The
following table provides an overview of the
reporting of risks within this section:
Risk type
Foreign exchange ...............
Interest rate ........................
Commodity ........................
Equity .................................
Credit spread ......................
Portfolio
Trading Non-trading
VAR
VAR
VAR
VAR
Sensitivity
VAR1
VAR2
N/A
Sensitivity
Sensitivity3
1 The structural foreign exchange risk is not included within
VAR. This is discussed on page 256.
2 The VAR for the fixed-rate securities issued by HSBC
Holdings is not included within the Group VAR. This is
disclosed separately on page 252.
3 Credit spread VAR is reported for the credit derivatives
transacted by Global Banking. This is disclosed on
page 251.
Value at risk
(Audited)
VAR is a technique that estimates the potential losses
that could occur on risk positions as a result of
movements in market rates and prices over a
specified time horizon and to a given level of
confidence.
The VAR models used by HSBC are
predominantly based on historical simulation. These
models derive plausible future scenarios from past
series of recorded market rates and prices, taking
account of inter-relationships between different
markets and rates such as interest rates and foreign
exchange rates. The models also incorporate the
effect of option features on the underlying
exposures.
The historical simulation models used by HSBC
incorporate the following features:
•
•
potential market movements are calculated with
reference to data from the past two years;
historical market rates and prices are calculated
with reference to foreign exchange rates and
commodity prices, interest rates, equity prices
and the associated volatilities;
• VAR is calculated to a 99 per cent confidence
level; and
• VAR is calculated for a one-day holding period.
HSBC routinely validates the accuracy of its
VAR models by backtesting the actual daily profit
and loss results, adjusted to remove non-modelled
items such as fees and commissions, against the
corresponding VAR numbers. Statistically, HSBC
would expect to see losses in excess of VAR only
1 per cent of the time over a one-year period. The
actual number of excesses over this period can
therefore be used to gauge how well the models are
performing.
Although a valuable guide to risk, VAR should
always be viewed in the context of its limitations.
For example:
•
•
the use of historical data as a proxy for
estimating future events may not encompass all
potential events, particularly those which are
extreme in nature;
the use of a one-day holding period assumes that
all positions can be liquidated or hedged in one
249
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Market risk > VAR / Trading portfolios
day. This may not fully reflect the market risk
arising at times of severe illiquidity, when a
one-day holding period may be insufficient to
liquidate or hedge all positions fully;
•
the use of a 99 per cent confidence level, by
definition, does not take into account losses that
might occur beyond this level of confidence;
• VAR is calculated on the basis of exposures
outstanding at the close of business and
therefore does not necessarily reflect intra-day
exposures; and
• VAR is unlikely to reflect loss potential on
exposures that only arise under significant
market moves.
HSBC recognises these limitations by
augmenting its VAR limits with other position and
sensitivity limit structures. HSBC also applies a wide
range of stress testing, both on individual portfolios
and on the Group’s consolidated positions.
The VAR, both trading and non-trading, for the
Group was as follows:
Value at risk
(Audited)
At 31 December .......................
Average ....................................
Minimum .................................
Maximum .................................
2007
US$m
95.3
78.4
55.6
107.0
20061
US$m
68.9
74.5
41.5
128.8
1 Restated to incorporate the VAR for HSBC Finance and
mortgage servicing rights that were previously reported
separately.
Total VAR at 31 December 2007 increased,
compared with 31 December 2006. The major cause
of this was an increase in volatility in market rates
during the latter half of 2007.
The daily VAR, both trading and non-trading,
for the Group was as follows:
Daily VAR (trading and non-trading) (US$m)
(Unaudited)
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Dec-05
Jun-06
Dec-06
Jun-07
Dec-07
The major contributor to the trading and non-
trading VAR for the Group was Global Markets.
250
The histograms below illustrate the frequency of
daily revenue arising from Global Markets’ trading,
balance sheet management and other trading
activities.
The average daily revenue earned therefrom in
2007 was US$18.7 million, compared with
US$21.3 million in 2006. The standard deviation of
these daily revenues was US$25.3 million, compared
with US$11.4 million in 2006. The standard
deviation measures the variation of daily revenues
about the mean value of those revenues. An analysis
of the frequency distribution of daily revenue shows
that there were 35 days with negative revenue during
2007, compared with two days in 2006.
Daily distribution of Global Markets’ trading,
balance sheet management and other trading
revenues
(Unaudited)
Year ended 31 December 2007
Number of days
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
71
51
37
37
15
9
14
9
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
3
3
2
0
2
1
-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Revenues (US$m)
80 130 140 150
(cid:31) Profit and loss frequency
Year ended 31 December 2006
Number of days
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
46 45
37
27 26
10 10
20
16
7
0 1 1
2 2
2 2
2
0 0 1 1 0
-12 -8 -4 0
4
8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80
(cid:31) Profit and loss frequency
Revenues (US$m)
The effect of any month-end adjustments, not attributable to a
specific daily market move, is spread evenly over the days in
the month in question.
For a description of HSBC’s fair value and price
verification controls, see Note 33 on the Financial
Statements.
Trading portfolios
(Audited)
HSBC’s control of market risk is based on a policy
of restricting individual operations to trading within
a list of permissible instruments authorised for each
site by Traded Credit and Market Risk, of enforcing
rigorous new product approval procedures, and of
restricting trading in the more complex derivative
products only to offices with appropriate levels of
product expertise and robust control systems.
In addition, at both portfolio and position levels,
market risk in trading portfolios is monitored and
VAR by risk type for the trading activities
(Audited)
controlled using a complementary set of techniques.
These include VAR and, for interest rate risk, present
value of a basis point movement in interest rates,
together with stress and sensitivity testing and
concentration limits. These techniques quantify the
impact on capital of defined market movements.
Market making and proprietary position taking
is undertaken within Global Markets. The VAR for
such trading activity at 31 December 2007 was
US$48.3 million (2006: US$30.2 million). This is
analysed below by risk type:
At 31 December 2007 ..................................................
At 31 December 2006 ...................................................
Average
2007 ..........................................................................
2006 ..........................................................................
Minimum
2007 ..........................................................................
2006 ..........................................................................
Maximum
2007 ..........................................................................
2006 ..........................................................................
Foreign
exchange and
commodity
US$m
11.5
7.3
9.9
6.3
4.4
2.6
23.2
12.7
Interest
rate
US$m
37.5
27.9
33.1
31.7
24.2
18.3
47.5
49.6
Equity
US$m
Total
US$m
23.7
11.8
15.1
6.5
8.1
2.6
28.1
11.8
48.3
30.2
36.7
31.6
26.3
19.9
56.0
48.2
The risk associated with movements in credit
spreads is primarily managed through sensitivity
limits, stress testing and VAR on those portfolios
where VAR is calculated.
The Group is introducing credit spread as a
separate risk type within the VAR models and,
at 31 December 2007, credit spread VAR was
calculated for the London trading and New York
credit derivatives portfolios. At that date, the total
VAR for the trading activities, including credit
spread VAR for the above portfolios, was
US$60.1 million.
The effect of movements in credit spreads on the
Group’s trading portfolio became more significant
in 2007 as volatility in these spreads increased in
the latter half of 2007. The sensitivity of trading
income to the effect of movements in credit spreads
on the total trading activities of the Group was
US$95.4 million at 31 December 2007 (2006:
US$27.3 million). This sensitivity was calculated
using simplified assumptions based on one-day
movements in average market credit spreads over a
two-year period at a confidence level of 99 per cent.
The increase in the sensitivity at 31 December
2007, compared with 31 December 2006, was due
to the effect of higher volatility in credit spreads
observed in the latter half of 2007. The credit spread
positions within the trading portfolios were at a
similar level on 31 December 2007 compared with
31 December 2006.
Credit spread risk also arises on credit derivative
transactions entered into by Global Banking. The
purpose of these transactions is to manage the risk
concentrations within the corporate loan portfolio
and so enhance capital efficiency. The mark-to-
market of these transactions is taken through the
profit and loss account.
At 31 December 2007, the credit spread VAR
on the credit derivatives transactions entered into
by Global Banking was US$19.7 million (2006:
US$8.2 million). The VAR shows the effect on
trading income from a one-day movement in credit
spreads over a two-year period, calculated to a
99 per cent confidence level.
HSBC augments its VAR measures with a series
of stress scenarios to determine the potential loss
arising from market moves that are outside the
99 per cent confidence level measured by VAR.
251
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Market risk > Trading portfolios / Non-trading portfolios
The stress scenarios cover a range of potential
market events, such as the hypothetical breaking of a
currency peg or the historical observation of market
moves during previous periods of stress which
would not be captured within VAR. The scenarios
provide senior management with an assessment of
the financial impact such events would have on the
profit and loss of HSBC. The daily losses
experienced during 2007 were within the stress loss
scenarios reported to senior management.
Certain transactions are structured such that the
risk to HSBC is negligible under a wide range of
market conditions or events, but in which there
exists a remote probability that a significant gap
event could lead to loss. A gap event could be seen
as a change in market price from one level to another
with no trading opportunity in between, and where
the price change breaches the threshold beyond
which the risk profile changes from having no open
risk to having full exposure to the underlying
structure. Such movements may occur, for example,
when there are adverse news announcements and the
market for a specific investment becomes illiquid,
making hedging impossible.
Given the characteristics of these transactions,
they will make little or no contribution to VAR or to
traditional market risk sensitivity measures. HSBC
captures the risks for such transactions within the
stress testing scenarios. Gap risk arising is monitored
on an ongoing basis, and HSBC incurred no gap
losses on such transactions in 2007.
Non-trading portfolios
(Audited)
The principal objective of market risk management
of non-trading portfolios is to optimise net interest
income.
Market risk in non-trading portfolios arises
principally from mismatches between the future
yield on assets and their funding cost, as a result
of interest rate changes. Analysis of this risk is
complicated by having to make assumptions on
embedded optionality within certain product areas
such as the incidence of mortgage prepayments,
and from behavioural assumptions regarding the
economic duration of liabilities which are
contractually repayable on demand such as current
accounts. The prospective change in future net
interest income from non-trading portfolios will be
reflected in the current realisable value of these
positions, should they be sold or closed prior to
maturity. In order to manage this risk optimally,
market risk in non-trading portfolios is transferred to
Global Markets or to separate books managed under
the supervision of the local ALCO.
The transfer of market risk to books managed by
Global Markets or supervised by ALCO is usually
achieved by a series of internal deals between the
business units and these books. When the
behavioural characteristics of a product differ from
its contractual characteristics, the behavioural
characteristics are assessed to determine the true
underlying interest rate risk. Local ALCOs are
required to regularly monitor all such behavioural
assumptions and interest rate risk positions to ensure
they comply with interest rate risk limits established
by the Group Management Board.
In certain cases, the non-linear characteristics of
products cannot be adequately captured by the risk
transfer process. For example, both the flow from
customer deposit accounts to alternative investment
products and the precise prepayment speeds of
mortgages will vary at different interest rate levels,
and where expectations about future moves in
interest rates change. In such circumstances,
simulation modelling is used to identify the impact
of varying scenarios on valuations and net interest
income.
Once market risk has been consolidated in
Global Markets or ALCO-managed books, the net
exposure is typically managed through the use of
interest rate swaps within agreed limits. The VAR for
these portfolios is included within the Group VAR
(see ‘Value at risk’ above).
Fixed-rate securities
(Audited)
Market risk also arises on fixed-rate securities issued
by HSBC Holdings. These securities are managed as
capital instruments and include non-cumulative
preference shares, non-cumulative perpetual
preferred securities and fixed-rate subordinated debt.
The interest rate VAR for these capital instruments,
which is not included within Group VAR, was as
follows:
252
Capital instruments VAR
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007 .................................
At 31 December 20061 ................................
Average
2007 .........................................................
20061 ........................................................
Minimum
2007 .........................................................
20061 ........................................................
Maximum
2007 .........................................................
20061 ........................................................
VAR
US$m
104.7
73.7
75.8
64.0
61.8
57.0
105.4
73.7
1 Restated to reflect securities issued by HSBC Holdings only.
All other issued fixed-rate securities are included within the
VAR for the Group.
At 31 December 2007, the sensitivity of equity
to the effect of movements in credit spreads on the
Group’s available-for-sale debt securities was
US$206.5 million (2006: US$52.0 million). The
sensitivity was calculated on the same basis as
applied to the trading portfolio. Including the gross
exposure for the SIVs consolidated within HSBC’s
balance sheet at 31 December 2007, the sensitivity
increased to US$279.8 million. This sensitivity is
struck, however, before taking account of any losses
which would be absorbed by the income note
holders. At 31 December 2007, the income note
holders would have absorbed the first US$1.3 billion
of any losses incurred by the SIVs prior to HSBC
incurring any equity losses.
The increase in this sensitivity at 31 December
2007, compared with 31 December 2006, was due
to the effect of higher volatility in credit spreads
observed in the latter half of 2007.
Equity securities classified as available
for sale
(Audited)
Market risk arises on equity securities held as
available for sale. The fair value of these securities
at 31 December 2007 was US$12.6 billion (2006:
US$8.3 billion) and included private equity holdings
of US$3.2 billion (2006: US$0.9 billion).
Investments in private equity are primarily made
through managed funds that are subject to limits
on the amount of investment. Potential new
commitments are subject to risk appraisal to ensure
that industry and geographical concentrations remain
within acceptable levels for the portfolio as a whole.
Regular reviews are performed to substantiate the
valuation of the investments within the portfolio and
Group Finance is responsible for reviewing the
carrying value of the investments. Funds typically
invested for short-term cash management
253
represented US$3.1 billion (2006: US$2.6 billion),
Investments held to facilitate ongoing business, such
as holdings in government-sponsored enterprises and
local stock exchanges, represented US$1.7 billion
(2006: US$1.3 billion). Other strategic investments
represented US$4.6 billion (2006: US$3.5 billion).
The fair value of the constituents of equity securities
classified as available for sale can fluctuate
considerably. A 10 per cent reduction in the value of
the available-for-sale equities at 31 December 2007
would have reduced equity by US$1.3 billion (2006:
US$0.8 billion).
Defined benefit pension scheme
(Audited)
Market risk also arises within HSBC’s defined
benefit pension schemes to the extent that the
obligations of the schemes are not fully matched by
assets with determinable cash flows. Pension scheme
obligations are subject to change due to fluctuations
in long-term interest rates as well as factors such as
changes in inflation, salary increases and scheme
members living longer. The pension scheme assets
will include equities and debt securities, the cash
flows of which will change as equity prices and
interest rates vary. The risks are that market
movements in equity prices and interest rates could
result in assets which are insufficient over time to
cover the level of projected obligations. In addition,
increases in inflation and members living longer
could increase the pension scheme obligations.
Management, together with the trustees who act on
behalf of the pension scheme beneficiaries, assess
the level of this risk using reports prepared by
independent external actuaries and take action,
where appropriate, in terms of setting investment
strategy and agreeing contribution levels. For
example, in order to mitigate the risk of adverse
movements in investments, interest rates and
inflation, the Trustee of the HSBC Bank (UK)
Pension Scheme has continued to implement a
programme of initiatives proposed by HSBC,
including reducing the equity content of the
investment strategy and increasing the
diversification of the investments, and entering into
long-term interest rate and inflation swaps.
The present value of HSBC’s defined benefit
pension plans’ liabilities was US$32.4 billion at
31 December 2007, compared with US$32.2 billion
at 31 December 2006. Assets of the defined benefit
schemes at 31 December 2007 comprised equity
investments, 26 per cent (2006: 30 per cent); debt
securities, 62 per cent (2006: 56 per cent); and other
(including property), 12 per cent (2006: 14 per cent)
(see Note 8 on the Financial Statements).
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Market risk > Non-trading portfolios / Sensitivity of NII
Increased corporate bond yields in the UK over
the period have resulted in an increase of 40 basis
points in the real discount rate (net of the increase in
expected inflation) used to value the net present
value of the benefits payable of the HSBC Bank
(UK) Pension Scheme, the Group’s largest plan. In
addition, the plan assets of the scheme have
increased due to a special contribution to the scheme
of US$0.6 billion. Primarily as a result of these
factors, the deficit on HSBC’s defined benefit plans
has decreased to US$2 billion from US$4.6 billion.
Sensitivity of net interest income
(Unaudited)
A principal part of HSBC’s management of market
risk in non-trading portfolios is to monitor the
sensitivity of projected net interest income under
varying interest rate scenarios (simulation
modelling). HSBC aims, through its management of
market risk in non-trading portfolios, to mitigate the
effect of prospective interest rate movements which
could reduce future net interest income, while
balancing the cost of such hedging activities on the
current net revenue stream.
For simulation modelling, businesses use a
Sensitivity of projected net interest income
(Unaudited)
combination of scenarios relevant to local businesses
and local markets and standard scenarios which are
required throughout HSBC. The standard scenarios
are consolidated to illustrate the combined pro forma
effect on HSBC’s consolidated portfolio valuations
and net interest income.
The table below sets out the effect on future net
interest income of an incremental 25 basis points
parallel fall or rise in all yield curves worldwide at
the beginning of each quarter during the 12 months
from 1 January 2008. Assuming no management
actions, a series of such rises would decrease
planned net interest income for 2008 by
US$503 million (2007: US$578 million), while
a series of such falls would increase planned
net interest income by US$525 million
(2007: US$511 million). These figures incorporate
the effect of any option features in the underlying
exposures.
Instead of assuming that all interest rates move
together, HSBC groups its interest rate exposures
into currency blocs whose rates are considered likely
to move together. The sensitivity of projected net
interest income, on this basis, is as follows:
US dollar
bloc
US$m
Rest of
Americas
bloc
US$m
Hong Kong
dollar
bloc
US$m
Rest of
Asia
bloc
US$m
Sterling
bloc
US$m
Euro
bloc
US$m
Total
US$m
Change in 2008 projected net
interest income arising from
a shift in yield curves of:
+ 25 basis points at the
beginning of each quarter .....
(275)
– 25 basis points at the
beginning of each quarter .....
272
Change in 2007 projected net
interest income arising from
a shift in yield curves of:
+ 25 basis points at the
beginning of each quarter .....
(342)
– 25 basis points at the
beginning of each quarter .....
249
96
(95)
53
(53)
9
11
(32)
52
77
(65)
18
(14)
(140)
(270)
(503)
142
260
525
(163)
(112)
(578)
164
113
511
The interest rate sensitivities set out in the
table above are illustrative only and are based on
simplified scenarios. The figures represent the effect
of the pro-forma movements in net interest income
based on the projected yield curve scenarios and the
Group’s current interest rate risk profile. This effect,
however, does not incorporate actions that would be
taken by Global Markets or in the business units to
mitigate the impact of this interest rate risk. In
reality, Global Markets seeks proactively to change
the interest rate risk profile to minimise losses and
optimise net revenues. The projections above also
assume that interest rates of all maturities move by
the same amount and, therefore, do not reflect the
potential impact on net interest income of some rates
changing while others remain unchanged. The
projections take account of the anticipated net
interest income impact of rate change differences
254
between interbank interest rates and interest rates
linked to other bases (such as Central Bank rates or
product rates over which the entity has discretion in
terms of the timing and extent of rate changes). The
projections make other simplifying assumptions too,
including that all positions run to maturity.
HSBC’s exposure to the effect of movements in
interest rates on its net interest income arise in three
main areas: core deposit franchises, HSBC Finance
and Global Markets.
• Core deposit franchises: these are exposed to
changes in the cost of deposits raised and
spreads on wholesale funds. In a low interest
rate environment, the net interest income benefit
of core deposits increases as interest rates rise
and decreases as interest rates fall. This risk is
asymmetrical in a very low interest rate
environment, however, as there is limited room
to lower deposit pricing in the event of interest
rate reductions.
• HSBC Finance reduces the sensitivity of the
core deposit franchises to interest rate
reductions. This arises from the fact that HSBC
Finance has a substantial fixed rate, real estate
secured, lending portfolio which is primarily
funded with interest rate sensitive short-term
liabilities.
• Residual interest rate risk is managed within
Global Markets, under the Group’s policy of
transferring interest rate risk to Global Markets
to be managed within defined limits and with
flexibility as to the instruments used.
The main drivers of change in the sensitivity of
the Group’s net interest income to the changes in
interest rates tabulated above were:
• There has been an overall increase in benefit
from rising rates and an increase in exposure to
falling rates due to general growth in core
deposits.
• The average life of certain US mortgage assets
has increased due to a reduction in the predicted
rate of refinancing, increasing the benefit from
reducing US dollar rates.
• Global Markets increased euro-denominated
net trading asset positions leading to increased
sensitivity in this currency to both rising and
falling rates. The funding of net trading assets
is generally sourced from floating rate retail
deposits and recorded in ‘Net interest income’
whereas the income from such assets is recorded
in ‘Net trading income’. Additionally, balance
sheet management increased its exposure to
euro-denominated assets in non-trading
portfolios, adding to the increased sensitivity.
It can be seen from the above that projecting the
movement in net interest income from prospective
changes in interest rates is a complex interaction of
structural and managed exposures.
HSBC monitors the sensitivity of reported
reserves to interest rate movements on a monthly
basis by assessing the expected reduction in
valuation of available-for-sale portfolios and cash
flow hedges due to parallel movements of plus or
minus 100 basis points in all yield curves. The table
below describes the sensitivity of HSBC’s reported
reserves to these movements at the end of 2007 and
2006 and the maximum and minimum month-end
figures during these years:
Sensitivity of reported reserves to interest rate movements
(Unaudited)
At 31 December 2007
+ 100 basis point parallel move in all yield curves .........................................
As a percentage of total shareholders’ equity .................................................
– 100 basis point parallel move in all yield curves .........................................
As a percentage of total shareholders’ equity .................................................
At 31 December 2006
+ 100 basis point parallel move in all yield curves .........................................
As a percentage of total shareholders’ equity .................................................
– 100 basis point parallel move in all yield curves .........................................
As a percentage of total shareholders’ equity .................................................
Maximum
impact
US$m
Minimum
impact
US$m
(1,738)
(1.4%)
2,048
1.6%
(2,015)
(1.9%)
1,944
1.8%
(1,519)
(1.2%)
1,430
1.1%
(1,358)
(1.3%)
1,270
1.2%
US$m
(1,737)
(1.4%)
1,977
1.5%
(1,558)
(1.4%)
1,456
1.3%
255
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Market risk > Structural foreign exchange exposures / HSBC Holdings / Areas of special interest
The sensitivities are illustrative only and are
based on simplified scenarios. The table shows
interest rate risk exposures arising in available-for-
sale portfolios and from cash flow hedges which
are marked-to-market through reserves. These
particular exposures form only a part of the
Group’s overall interest rate exposures. The
accounting treatment under IFRSs of the Group’s
remaining interest rate exposures, while
economically largely offsetting the exposures
shown in the above table, does not require
revaluation movements to go to reserves.
Structural foreign exchange exposures
(Unaudited)
Structural foreign exchange exposures represent net
investments in subsidiaries, branches or associated
undertakings, the functional currencies of which
are currencies other than the US dollar.
Exchange differences on structural exposures
are recorded in the consolidated statement of
recognised income and expense. The main
operating (or functional) currencies in which
HSBC’s business is transacted are the US dollar,
the Hong Kong dollar, pound sterling, the euro, the
Mexican peso, the Brazilian real and the Chinese
renminbi. As the US dollar and currencies linked to
it form the dominant currency bloc in which
HSBC’s operations transact business, HSBC
Holdings prepares its consolidated financial
statements in US dollars. HSBC’s consolidated
balance sheet is, therefore, affected by exchange
differences between the US dollar and all the non-
US dollar functional currencies of underlying
subsidiaries.
HSBC hedges structural foreign exchange
exposures only in limited circumstances. HSBC’s
structural foreign exchange exposures are managed
with the primary objective of ensuring, where
practical, that HSBC’s consolidated capital ratios
and the capital ratios of individual banking
subsidiaries are protected from the effect of
changes in exchange rates. This is usually achieved
by ensuring that, for each subsidiary bank, the ratio
of structural exposures in a given currency to risk-
weighted assets denominated in that currency is
broadly equal to the capital ratio of the subsidiary
in question.
Selective hedges were in place during 2006
and 2007. Hedging is undertaken using forward
foreign exchange contracts which are accounted for
under IFRSs as hedges of a net investment in a
foreign operation, or by financing with borrowings
in the same currencies as the functional currencies
involved. There was no ineffectiveness arising from
these hedges in the year ended 31 December 2007.
There was no material effect from exchange
differences on HSBC’s capital ratios during the
year.
HSBC Holdings
(Audited)
As a financial services holding company, HSBC
Holdings has limited market risk activity. Its
activities predominantly involve maintaining
sufficient capital resources to support the Group’s
diverse activities; allocating these capital resources
across the Group’s businesses; earning dividend
and interest income on its investments in the
Group’s businesses; providing dividend payments
to HSBC Holding’s equity shareholders and interest
payments to providers of debt capital; and
maintaining a supply of short-term cash resources.
It does not take proprietary trading positions.
The main market risks to which HSBC
Holdings is exposed are interest rate risk and
foreign currency risk. Exposure to these risks arises
from short-term cash balances, funding positions
held, loans to subsidiaries, investments in long-
term financial assets and financial liabilities
including debt capital issued. The objective of
HSBC Holding’s market risk management strategy
is to reduce exposure to these risks and minimise
volatility in reported income, cash flows and
distributable reserves. Market risk for HSBC
Holdings is monitored by its Structural Positions
Review Group.
Certain loans to subsidiaries of a capital nature
that are not denominated in the functional currency
of either the provider or the recipient are accounted
for as financial assets. Changes in the carrying
amount of these assets due to exchange differences
are taken directly to the income statement. These
loans, and the associated foreign exchange
exposures, are eliminated on a Group consolidated
basis.
256
Total VAR arising within HSBC Holdings in
(Unaudited)
2007 and 2006 was as follows:
Value at risk – HSBC Holdings
(Audited)
Foreign
exchange
US$m
Interest
rates
US$m
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
49.1
30.8
97.7
61.4
Average
2007 ......................
2006 ......................
33.6
27.4
66.0
43.6
Minimum
2007 ......................
2006 ......................
29.2
23.2
52.7
30.7
Total
US$m
105.0
66.4
68.1
49.2
53.3
34.8
Maximum
2007 ......................
2006 ......................
49.1
32.0
97.7
61.4
105.0
66.4
The increase in total VAR during 2007 was
mainly due to the increase in volatility of interest
rates and new debt capital issues made in the year.
A principal tool in the management of market
risk is the projected sensitivity of HSBC Holdings’
net interest income to future changes in yield
curves.
The table below sets out the effect on HSBC
Holdings’ future net interest income of an
incremental 25 basis point parallel fall or rise in all
yield curves worldwide at the beginning of each
quarter during the 12 months from 1 January 2008.
Assuming no management action, a series
of such rises would decrease HSBC Holdings’
planned net interest income for 2008 by
US$23 million (2007: increase of US$8 million)
while a series of such falls would increase
planned net interest income by US$23 million
(2007: decrease of US$8 million). These figures
incorporate the impact of any option features in
the underlying exposures.
Instead of assuming that all interest rates move
together, HSBC groups its interest rate exposures
into currency blocs whose interest rates are
considered likely to move together. The sensitivity
of projected net interest income, on this basis, is
described as follows:
Sensitivity of HSBC Holdings’ net interest income to interest rate movements
(Unaudited)
US dollar
bloc
US$m
Sterling
bloc
US$m
Euro
bloc
US$m
Total
US$m
Change in 2008 projected net interest income arising
from a shift in yield curves of:
+ 25 basis points at the beginning of each quarter ..
– 25 basis points at the beginning of each quarter ..
Change in 2007 projected net interest income arising
from a shift in yield curves of:
+ 25 basis points at the beginning of each quarter ..
– 25 basis points at the beginning of each quarter ..
HSBC Holdings’ principal exposure to changes
in its net interest income from movements in interest
rates arises on short-term cash balances, floating rate
loans advanced to subsidiaries and fixed rate debt
capital securities in issue which have been swapped
to floating rate.
The interest rate sensitivities tabulated above
are illustrative only and are based on simplified
scenarios. The figures represent the effect of
pro forma movements in net interest income based
on the projected yield curve scenarios and HSBC
Holdings’ current interest rate risk profile. They do
not take into account the effect of actions that could
be taken to mitigate this interest rate risk, however.
(51)
51
(7)
7
16
(16)
6
(6)
12
(12)
9
(9)
(23)
23
8
(8)
The projected increase in HSBC Holdings’
sensitivity to moves in interest rates is mainly due to
new interest-bearing capital issues, the funds from
which have been largely invested in non-interest
bearing equity investments in subsidiaries.
Areas of special interest – market risk
(Audited)
In the second half of 2007, credit risk concerns
emanating from the US sub-prime mortgage market
led to a deterioration in the fair value of assets
supported by sub-prime mortgages. However, there
was a consequential impact beyond sub-prime
related assets and, to a lesser degree, fair value
257
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Market risk > Areas of special interest / Monoline insurers
deterioration occurred in US mortgage-related
financial instruments generally, with financial
instruments issued by non-US government
sponsored entities more significantly affected
than sponsored financial instruments.
The following table shows the net market risk
arising from HSBC’s exposure to US mortgage
loans held at fair value through profit or loss, and
US mortgage-backed securities (‘MBSs’) including
those represented by collateralised debt obligations
(‘CDOs’). HSBC’s exposures arise from the
following activities:
−
−
−
purchase of sub-prime whole loans with
the intention of structuring and placing
securitisations into the market;
secondary market trading activities; and
holding of MBSs as part of investment
(Audited)
Year ended 31 December 2007
US sub-prime mortgage-related assets4
Direct lending ...............................................................................
MBSs5 ...........................................................................................
– high grade (AA or AAA rated) .............................................
– rated C to A ...........................................................................
– not publicly rated ...................................................................
MBS CDOs5 ..................................................................................
– high grade (AA or AAA rated) .............................................
– rated C to A ...........................................................................
– not publicly rated ...................................................................
Other US mortgage-related assets
Direct lending ...............................................................................
MBSs5 ...........................................................................................
– high grade (AA or AAA rated) .............................................
– rated C to A ...........................................................................
– not publicly rated ...................................................................
portfolios including the HSBC consolidated
SIVs and conduits.
Unrealised and realised gains and losses arising
from securitisation and secondary market trading
activity are recognised in the income statement,
while changes in fair value of the investment
portfolio and the SIV and conduit portfolios are
recognised in equity. US MBSs are primarily
measured at fair value; a small proportion of high
grade securities are classified as held-to-maturity and
measured at amortised cost. There are no significant
differences between fair value and carrying amount
for these US MBSs measured at amortised cost.
HSBC’s principal exposure to the US mortgage
market is via credit risk from loans and advances
to customers, details of which are set out from
page 216.
Principal1
US$m
Carrying
amount
US$m
Unrealised
gains
and losses2
US$m
Realised
gains
and losses2
US$m
Fair value
movements
recognised3
US$m
2,692
5,733
5,233
443
57
701
665
36
–
2,231
5,146
4,909
186
51
560
531
29
–
(383)
(557)
(114)
(275)
(168)
(97)
(95)
(2)
–
(221)
(69)
12
–
(187)
(187)
–
–
(43)
(38)
(5)
–
9,126
7,937
(1,037)
(278)
(230)
762
47,958
47,859
87
12
756
46,320
46,254
54
12
(4)
(181)
(147)
(34)
–
41
(38)
–
(1,051)
(1,051)
–
–
48,720
47,076
(185)
3
(1,051)
258
Year ended 31 December 2006
US sub-prime mortgage-related assets
Direct lending ...............................................................................
MBSs5 ...........................................................................................
– high grade (AA or AAA rated) .............................................
– rated C to A ...........................................................................
– not publicly rated ...................................................................
MBS CDOs5 ..................................................................................
– high grade (AA or AAA rated) .............................................
– rated C to A ...........................................................................
– not publicly rated ...................................................................
Other US mortgage-related assets
Direct lending ...............................................................................
MBSs5 ...........................................................................................
– high grade (AA or AAA rated) .............................................
– rated C to A ...........................................................................
– not publicly rated ...................................................................
Unrealised
gains
and losses2
US$m
Realised
gains
and losses2
US$m
Fair value
movements
recognised3
US$m
Principal1
US$m
Carrying
amount
US$m
4,947
2,986
2,640
155
191
326
326
–
–
4,997
2,944
2,641
146
157
325
325
–
–
227
5
–
(11)
(41)
1
(1)
(41)
–
–
–
–
8,259
8,266
(52)
232
1,317
40,001
39,825
136
40
1,322
38,691
38,531
132
28
41,318
40,013
2
(72)
(59)
–
(13)
(70)
45
70
115
–
2
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
–
(42)
(42)
–
–
(42)
1 The principal is the redemption amount on maturity or, in the case of an amortising instrument, the sum of the future redemption
amounts through the residual life of the security.
2 Recognised during the year in the income statement.
3 Fair value gains and losses recognised during the year in equity.
4 HSBC has primarily utilised loan counterparty credit scores as the basis for determining whether an asset is classified as sub-prime.
5 Mortgage-backed securities (‘MBSs’) and collateralised debt obligations (‘CDOs’).
In addition to the exposure detailed above,
HSBC also holds long positions in MBSs with
a carrying value of US$1,633 million (2006:
US$963 million) and MBS CDOs with a carrying
value of US$349 million (2006: US$608 million)
where the exposure has been matched by specific
credit derivatives with monolines and other financial
institutions. The counterparty credit risk arising
from the derivative transactions undertaken with
monolines is included in the monoline exposure
analysis detailed on page 260.
HSBC’s exposure to derivative transactions
entered into directly with monoline insurers
(Audited)
HSBC’s principal exposure to monoline insurers is
through a number of OTC derivative transactions,
primarily credit default swaps (‘CDSs’). HSBC has
entered into CDSs to purchase credit protection
against securities held within the trading portfolio.
During the second half of 2007, the market value of
the securities declined, with offsetting increases in
the mark-to-market value of the CDS transactions,
thereby increasing OTC counterparty credit risk to
the monoline insurers. The table below sets out the
mark-to-market value of the derivative contracts at
31 December 2007, and hence the amount at risk,
based on 31 December 2007 security prices, if the
CDS protection purchased were to be wholly
ineffective because, for example, the monoline
insurer was unable to meet its obligations. In order to
assess that risk, protection purchased is sub-divided
between those monoline insurers that had external
investment grade ratings at 25 February 2008, and
those that did not. The ‘Credit Risk Adjustment’
column indicates the valuation adjustment taken
against the mark-to-market exposures, and reflects
the deterioration in creditworthiness of the monoline
insurers during 2007. These adjustments have been
charged to the income statement.
259
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Residual value risk management / Operational risk management > Legal risk
HSBC’s exposure to derivative transactions entered into directly with monoline insurers
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
Derivative transactions with monoline counterparties:
– Monoline – investment grade ...................................................................
– Monoline – below investment grade ........................................................
Net exposure
before credit
risk adjustment1
US$m
Credit risk
adjustment2
US$m
Net exposure
after credit
risk adjustment
US$m
1,342
214
1,556
(133)
(214)
(347)
1,209
–
1,209
At 31 December 2006
Derivative transactions with monoline counterparties:
– Monoline – investment grade ...................................................................
9
–
9
1 Net exposure after legal netting and any other relevant credit mitigation prior to deduction of credit risk adjustment.
2 Fair value adjustment recorded against over-the-counter derivative counterparty exposures to reflect the credit worthiness of the
counterparty.
HSBC’s exposure to debt securities which benefit
from guarantees provided by monoline insurers
(Audited)
Within both the trading and available-for-sale
portfolios, HSBC holds bonds that are ‘wrapped’
with a credit enhancement from a monoline insurer.
Any deterioration in the credit profile of the
monoline insurer is reflected in market prices and
therefore in the carrying value of these securities in
HSBC’s balance sheet at 31 December 2007. For
wrapped bonds held in the trading portfolio, the
mark-to-market loss has been reflected through the
income statement. For wrapped bonds held in the
available-for-sale portfolio, the mark-to-market
deterioration is reflected in equity unless the
impairment is regarded as permanent, in which case
it is reflected in the income statement. There was no
permanent impairment recognised in respect of these
assets at 31 December 2007.
HSBC’s exposure to direct lending and
irrevocable commitments to lend to monoline
insurers
(Audited)
HSBC has extended liquidity facilities totalling
US$158 million to monoline insurers, none of which
was drawn at 31 December 2007 (31 December
2006: US$145 million, none of which was drawn).
Residual value risk management
(Unaudited)
A significant part of a lessor’s return from operating
leases is dependent upon its management of residual
value risk. This arises from operating lease
transactions to the extent that the values recovered
from disposing of leased assets or re-letting them at
the end of the lease terms (the ‘residual values’)
differ from those projected at the inception of the
leases. The business regularly monitors residual
value exposure by reviewing the recoverability of
the residual value projected at lease inception. This
entails considering the potential of re-letting of
operating lease assets and their projected disposal
proceeds at the end of their lease terms. Provision is
made to the extent that the carrying values of leased
assets are impaired through residual values not being
fully recoverable.
The net book value of equipment leased to
customers on operating leases by the Group includes
projected residual values at the end of current lease
terms, to be recovered through re-letting or disposal
in the following periods:
Residual values
(Unaudited)
Within 1 year ............................
Between 1-2 years ....................
Between 2-5 years ....................
More than 5 years ....................
Total exposure ..........................
2007
US$m
155
243
713
1,892
3,003
2006
US$m
200
414
379
1,996
2,989
Operational risk management
(Unaudited)
Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from fraud,
unauthorised activities, error, omission, inefficiency,
systems failure or external events. It is inherent in
every business organisation and covers a wide
spectrum of issues.
HSBC manages this risk through a controls-
based environment in which processes are
documented, authorisation is independent and
transactions are reconciled and monitored. In each
of HSBC’s subsidiaries, local management is
responsible for the review and supervision of the
operation of these controls. The control environment
260
in each subsidiary is subject to an independent
programme of periodic reviews undertaken by
Internal Audit. This is supported by the monitoring
of external operational risk events, which ensures
that HSBC stays in line with industry best practice
and takes account of lessons learned from publicised
operational failures within the financial services
industry.
HSBC has codified its operational risk
management framework by issuing a high level
standard, supplemented by more detailed formal
policies. The detailed policies explain HSBC’s
approach to identifying, assessing, monitoring and
controlling operational risk, give guidance on
remedial action to be taken when rectifying
operational risk events and set out responsibilities
for meeting local regulatory requirements. Processes
undertaken to manage operational risk are
determined by reference to the scale and nature of
each HSBC operation. The HSBC standard covers
the following:
•
operational risk management responsibility is
assigned to senior management within each
business operation;
•
•
•
•
information systems are used to record the
identification and assessment of operational
risks and to generate appropriate, regular
operational risk reporting;
assessments are undertaken of the operational
risks facing each business and the risks inherent
in its processes, activities and products. Risk
assessments incorporate an evaluation of the
effectiveness of controls and are regularly
reviewed to identify significant changes;
operational risk loss data is collected and
reported to senior management at the business
unit level. Aggregate operational risk losses are
recorded and details of incidents above a
materiality threshold are reported to Group
Head Office. A regular report on operational
losses is made to Group Audit Committee and
the Risk Management Meeting; and
risk mitigation, including insurance, is
considered where this is cost-effective.
In each of HSBC’s subsidiaries, local
management is responsible for implementing HSBC
standards on operational risk throughout their
operations and, where deficiencies are evident,
rectifying them within a reasonable timeframe.
Subsidiaries acquired by HSBC are required to
assess, plan and implement the standard’s
requirements within an agreed timescale.
261
HSBC maintains and tests contingency facilities
to support operations in the event of disasters.
Additional reviews and tests are conducted in the
event that any HSBC office is affected by a business
disruption event to incorporate lessons learned in the
operational recovery from those circumstances. As
part of HSBC’s contingency planning, all country
managers have prepared plans for the operation of
their businesses with reduced staffing levels, should
a flu pandemic occur. Country managers are required
to update these plans as circumstances change.
Legal risk
(Unaudited)
Each operating company is required to implement
policies, procedures and guidelines in respect of the
management and control of legal risk which conform
to HSBC standards. Legal risk falls within the
definition of operational risk and includes
contractual risk, legislative risk, intellectual property
risk and litigation risk. Legal risk is the risk of:
•
•
•
failing to act appropriately or diligently in
response to a claim made against any HSBC
company;
failing to take the proper action to preserve
recourse to insurers in respect of any claim
against an HSBC company;
being unable to successfully defend a claim
brought against any HSBC company;
• HSBC being unable to take action to enforce its
rights through the courts; or
•
failing to take steps to mitigate the likelihood
that a claim will be made against an HSBC
company.
HSBC has a dedicated global legal function
which is responsible for managing legal risk. This
comprises the provision of legal advice and support
in resisting claims and legal proceedings against
HSBC companies, including analysis of legal issues
and the management of any litigation, as well as in
respect of non-routine debt recoveries or other
litigation against third parties.
The Head Office legal department oversees the
global legal function and is headed by a Group
General Manager who reports to the Group
Chairman. There are legal departments in 56 of the
countries in which HSBC operates which have
primary responsibility for identifying and assessing
legal risk and advising local management in their
respective jurisdictions on these matters. There is
also a regional-level legal function in each of
Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle
East, and Asia-Pacific.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Pension risk / Reputational risk management / Sustainability risk management
HSBC policy requires operating companies to
notify the appropriate in-house legal department
immediately any litigation is either threatened or
commenced against the Group or an employee.
Claims which exceed US$1.5 million must be
advised immediately to the appropriate regional legal
department. Claims where the amount exceeds
US$5 million, where the action is by a regulatory
authority, where the proceedings are criminal, or
where the claim might materially affect the Group’s
reputation must immediately be advised to the Head
Office legal department. Such matters are then
advised to the Risk Management Meeting of the
Group Management Board in a monthly paper.
HSBC policy also requires that an exception
report must be made to the local compliance function
and escalated to the Head of Group Compliance in
respect of any breach which has given rise to a fine
and/or costs levied by a court of law or regulatory
body where the amount is US$1,500 or more, and
material or significant issues are reported to the Risk
Management Meeting of the Group Management
Board and/or the Group Audit Committee.
In addition, operating companies are required to
submit quarterly returns detailing outstanding claims
where the claim (or group of similar claims) exceeds
US$10 million, where the action is by a regulatory
authority, where the proceedings are criminal, where
the claim might materially affect the Group’s
reputation, or, where the Head Office legal
department has requested returns be completed for a
particular claim. These returns are used for reporting
to the Group Audit Committee and the Board of
HSBC Holdings, and disclosure in the Interim
Report and Annual Report and Accounts if
appropriate.
Global security and fraud risk
(Unaudited)
Security and fraud risk issues are managed at Group
level by Global Security and Fraud Risk. This unit,
which has responsibility for physical, fraud,
information and contingency risk, and security and
business intelligence, is now fully integrated within
the central Group Risk function. This will facilitate
synergies between it and other risk functions, such
as with Global Retail Risk Management in the
selection, design and implementation of systems and
processes to protect the Group against fraud by
deterring fraudulent activity, detecting it where it
does occur and mitigating its effects.
Pension risk
(Unaudited)
HSBC operates a number of pension plans
throughout the world, as described in Note 8 on the
Financial Statements. Some of these pension plans
are defined benefit plans, of which the largest is the
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme.
In order to fund these benefits, sponsoring group
companies (and in some instances, employees) make
regular contributions in accordance with advice from
actuaries and in consultation with the scheme’s
Trustees (where relevant). The defined benefit plans
invest these contributions in a range of investments
designed to meet their long-term liabilities.
The level of these contributions has a direct
impact on the cash flow of the Group and would
normally be set to ensure that there are sufficient
funds to meet the cost of the accruing benefits for the
future service of active members. However, higher
contributions will be required when plan assets are
considered insufficient to cover the existing pension
liabilities as a deficit exists. Contribution rates are
typically revised annually or triennially, depending
on the plan. The agreed contributions to the HSBC
Bank (UK) Pension Scheme are revised triennially.
A deficit in a defined benefit plan may arise
from a number of factors, including:
•
•
•
investments delivering a return below that
required to provide the projected plan benefits.
This could arise, for example, when there is a
fall in the market value of equities, or when
increases in long-term interest rates cause a fall
in the value of fixed income securities held;
a change in either interest rates or inflation
which causes an increase in the value of the
scheme liabilities; and
scheme members living longer than expected
(known as longevity risk).
The plan’s investment strategy is determined
in the light of the market risk inherent in the
investments and the consequential impact on
potential future contributions.
Ultimate responsibility for investment strategy
rests with either the Trustees or, in certain
circumstances, a Management Committee. The
degree of independence of the Trustees from HSBC
differs in different jurisdictions. For example, the
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme, which accounts
for over 40 per cent of the net liability of the Group’s
pension plans, is overseen by a corporate Trustee.
This scheme’s Trustee regularly monitors the market
risks inherent in the scheme.
262
ensure a strong adherence to HSBC’s risk
management system and its corporate responsibility
practices.
Sustainability risk management
(Unaudited)
Sustainability risks arise from the provision of
financial services to companies or projects which run
counter to the needs of sustainable development; in
effect this risk arises when the environmental and
social effects outweigh economic benefits. Within
Group Head Office, a separate function, Group
Corporate Sustainability, is mandated to manage
these risks globally. Its risk management
responsibilities include:
•
•
•
formulating sustainability risk policies. This
includes oversight of HSBC’s sustainability risk
standards, management of the Equator
Principles for project finance lending, and
sector-based sustainability policies covering
those sectors with high environmental or social
impacts (forestry, freshwater infrastructure,
chemicals, energy, mining and metals, and
defence-related lending); undertaking an
independent review of transactions where
sustainability risks are assessed to be high, and
supporting HSBC’s operating companies to
assess similar risks of a lower magnitude;
building and implementing systems-based
processes to ensure consistent application of
policies, reduce the costs of sustainability risk
reviews and capture management information to
measure and report on the effect of HSBC’s
lending and investment activities on sustainable
development; and
providing training and capacity building within
HSBC’s operating companies to ensure
sustainability risks are identified and mitigated
on a consistent basis and to either HSBC’s own
standards, or international standards or local
regulations, whichever is the higher.
Reputational risk management
(Unaudited)
The safeguarding of HSBC’s reputation is of
paramount importance to its continued prosperity
and is the responsibility of every member of staff,
and HSBC regularly reviews its policies and
procedures for safeguarding against reputational and
operational risks. This is an evolutionary process
which takes account of relevant developments and
industry guidance such as The Association of British
Insurers’ guidance on best practice when responding
to environmental, social and governance (‘ESG’)
risks.
HSBC has always aspired to the highest
standards of conduct and, as a matter of routine,
takes account of reputational risks to its business.
Reputational risks can arise from a wide variety of
causes, including ESG issues and operational risk
events. As a banking group, HSBC’s good reputation
depends upon the way in which it conducts its
business, but it can also be affected by the way in
which clients, to whom it provides financial services,
conduct themselves. The training of Directors on
appointment includes reputational matters.
A Reputational Risk Committee (‘RRC’) has
been established at which relevant Group functions
with responsibility for activities and functions which
attract reputational risk are represented. The primary
role of the RRC is to consider areas and activities
presenting significant reputational risk and, where
appropriate, to make recommendations to the Risk
Management Meeting and the Group Management
Board for policy or procedural changes to mitigate
such risk.
Standards on all major aspects of business are
set for HSBC and for individual subsidiaries,
businesses and functions. Reputational risks,
including ESG matters, are considered and assessed
by the Board, the Group Management Board, the
Risk Management Meeting, subsidiary company
boards, board committees and senior management
during the formulation of policy and the
establishment of HSBC standards. These policies,
which form an integral part of the internal control
system (see page 304), are communicated through
manuals and statements of policy and are
promulgated through internal communications and
training. The policies cover ESG issues and set out
operational procedures in all areas of reputational
risk, including money laundering deterrence,
environmental impact, anti-corruption measures and
employee relations. The policy manuals address risk
issues in detail and co-operation between Head
Office departments and businesses is required to
263
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Life / Non-life / Insurance risk
Risk management of insurance
operations
(Audited)
HSBC operates a bancassurance model which
provides insurance products for customers with
whom the Group has a banking relationship. Many
of these products are manufactured by HSBC
subsidiaries, but where the Group considers it
operationally more effective, third parties are
engaged to manufacture and provide insurance
products which HSBC sells through its banking
network. The Group works with a limited number of
market-leading partners to provide these products.
When manufacturing products, the Group
underwrites the insurance risk and retains the risks
and rewards associated with writing insurance
contracts. HSBC’s exposure to risks associated with
manufacturing insurance contracts in its subsidiaries
and its management of these risks are discussed
below.
One advantage of the bancassurance model to
HSBC is that, where the Group manufactures
products to sell to customers, the underwriting profit
is retained within the Group as is the commission
paid by the manufacturer to the bank distribution
channel. When HSBC sells products provided by
third parties, it earns a commission. HSBC sells
insurance products across all its customer groups,
mainly utilising its retail branches, the internet and
phone centres. Personal Financial Services
customers attract the majority of sales and comprise
the majority of policyholders. HSBC offers its
customers a wide range of insurance and investment
products, many of which complement other bank and
consumer finance products.
HSBC’s bancassurance business operates in all
five of the Group’s geographical regions with over
35 legal entities manufacturing insurance products.
The majority of these insurance operations are
subsidiaries of banking legal entities and comply
with their management control procedures. In
addition to local management requirements, the
insurance operations follow guidelines issued by the
Group Insurance Head Office. The Group Insurance
Head Office is headed by the Group’s Managing
Director of Insurance, supported by a Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Finance Officer. The
role of Group Insurance Head Office includes setting
the control framework for monitoring and measuring
insurance risk in line with existing Group practices,
and defining insurance-specific policies and
guidelines for inclusion in the Group Instruction
Manuals. The control framework for monitoring risk
includes the Group Insurance Risk Committee, to
which four Group Insurance sub-committees report,
264
focusing on operational risk, insurance risk,
market and liquidity risk, and credit risk. The
sub-committees of the Group Insurance Risk
Committee were introduced during 2007. The
processes and controls employed to monitor
individual risks are described under their respective
headings below. The main contracts manufactured
by HSBC are described below.
Life insurance business
(Audited)
Life insurance contracts with discretionary
participation features (‘DPF’) allow policyholders
to participate in the profits generated from such
business, which may take the form of annual
bonuses and a final bonus, in addition to providing
cover on death. The largest portfolio, which is in
Hong Kong, is a book of endowment and whole-life
policies, with annual bonuses awarded to
policyholders. In addition, certain minimum return
levels are guaranteed.
Credit life insurance business is written to
underpin banking and finance products. The policy
pays a claim if the holder of the loan is unable to
make repayments due to early death or
unemployment.
Annuities are contracts providing regular
payments of income from capital investment for
either a fixed period or during the annuitant’s
lifetime. Payments to the annuitant either begin on
inception of the policy (immediate annuities) or at a
designated future date (deferred annuities).
Term assurance and critical illness policies
provide cover in the event of death (term assurance)
and serious illness.
Linked life insurance contracts pay benefits to
policyholders which are typically determined by
reference to the value of the investments supporting
the policies.
Investment contracts with DPF allow
policyholders to participate in the profits generated
by such business. The largest portfolio is written in
France. Policyholders are guaranteed to receive a
return on their investment plus any discretionary
bonuses. In addition, certain minimum return levels
are guaranteed.
Unit-linked investment contracts are those
where the principal benefit payable is the value of
assigned assets.
Other investment contracts include pension
contracts written in Hong Kong.
Non-life insurance business
(Audited)
Non-life insurance contracts include motor, fire and
other damage to property, accident and health,
repayment protection and commercial insurances.
Motor insurance business covers vehicle
damage and liability for personal injury. For fire and
other damage to property, the predominant focus in
most markets is insurance for home and contents for
individuals, with cover for selected commercial
customers largely written in Asia and Latin America.
A very limited portfolio of liability business is
written (other than that which is included in the
motor book).
Credit non-life insurance is concentrated in
North America and Europe. This business is
originated in conjunction with the provision of loans.
Given the nature of the contracts written by the
Group, the risk to which the Group insurance
operations are exposed falls into two principal
categories: insurance risk and financial risk.
The following section describes the nature and
extent of the risks that arise in the Group’s insurance
subsidiaries and the principal approach that HSBC
adopts to managing them. The majority of the risk in
the insurance business resides in the manufacturing
activities.
Insurance risk
(Audited)
Insurance risk is a risk, other than financial risk,
transferred from the holder of a contract to the
issuer, in this case HSBC. The principal insurance
risk faced by HSBC is that the combined cost of
claims, administration and acquisition of the contract
may exceed the aggregate amount of premiums
received and investment income. The cost of a claim
can be influenced by many factors, including
mortality and morbidity experience, lapse and
surrender rates and, where the policy has a savings
element, the performance of the assets held to
support the liabilities.
HSBC manages its exposure to insurance risk
by applying formal underwriting, reinsurance and
claims-handling procedures designed to ensure
compliance with regulations and insurance risk
appetite, the latter proposed by local businesses and
authorised centrally. This is supplemented by
undertaking stress testing.
The insurance contracts sold by the Group
relate, in the main, to core underlying banking
activities such as savings or investment products and
265
credit life products. The Group’s manufacturing
focuses on personal lines, i.e. contracts written for
individuals. Personal lines tend to be of higher
volume and lower individual value than commercial
lines, and this diversifies the insurance risk.
Life and non-life business insurance risks are
controlled by high level procedures set centrally,
supplemented as appropriate with locally-imposed
measures which take account of specific local
market conditions and regulatory requirements. For
example, manufacturing entities are required to
obtain authorisation from Group Insurance Head
Office to write certain classes of business, with
restrictions applying particularly to commercial and
liability non-life insurance. Local ALCOs are
required to monitor certain risk exposures, in
particular for life business.
Reinsurance is also used as a means of
mitigating exposure, in particular to aggregations of
catastrophe risk. Specific examples are as follows:
• Accident and health insurance. Potential
exposure to concentrations of claims arising
from particular events, such as earthquakes or a
pandemic, are mitigated by the purchase of
catastrophe reinsurance.
• Motor insurance. Reinsurance protection is
arranged to avoid excessive exposure to larger
losses, particularly from personal injury claims.
• Fire and other damage to property. Portfolios at
risk from catastrophic losses are protected by
reinsurance in accordance with information
obtained from professional risk-modelling
organisations.
The following tables provide an analysis of the
insurance risk exposures by geography and by type
of business. By definition, HSBC is not exposed to
insurance risk on investment contracts, so they have
not been included in the insurance risk management
analysis.
Life business tends to be longer-term in nature
than non-life business and frequently involves an
element of savings and investment in the contract.
Separate tables are therefore provided for life and
non-life businesses, reflecting their distinctive risk
characteristics. The life insurance risk table provides
an analysis of insurance liabilities as the best
available overall measure of insurance exposure,
because provisions for life contracts are typically set
by reference to expected future cash outflows
relating to the underlying policies. The table for
non-life business uses written premiums as the best
available measure of risk exposure.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Insurance risk
Analysis of life insurance risk – liabilities to policyholders
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
Life (non-linked)
Insurance contracts with DPF1 .......................
Credit life ........................................................
Annuities ........................................................
Term assurance and other long-term
contracts .....................................................
Total life (non-linked) ........................................
Life (linked) ........................................................
Investment contracts with DPF1,2 .......................
Insurance liabilities to policyholders ..................
At 31 December 2006
Life (non-linked)
Insurance contracts with DPF1 ...........................
Credit life ........................................................
Annuities ........................................................
Term assurance and other long-term
contracts .....................................................
Total life (non-linked) ........................................
Life (linked) ........................................................
Investment contracts with DPF1,2 .......................
Europe
US$m
940
235
413
675
2,263
1,720
18,954
22,937
195
130
271
1,134
1,730
1,270
–
Hong
Kong
US$m
8,489
–
–
74
8,563
2,019
–
10,582
6,001
–
–
75
6,076
765
–
Insurance liabilities to policyholders ..................
3,000
6,841
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
Latin
America
US$m
America
US$m
Total
US$m
231
–
28
85
344
467
29
840
193
–
26
89
308
402
20
730
–
82
1,154
125
1,361
–
–
–
–
1,532
307
1,839
2,193
–
1,361
4,032
–
200
1,106
–
1,306
–
–
–
–
1,370
236
1,606
1,248
–
9,660
317
3,127
1,266
14,370
6,399
18,983
39,752
6,389
330
2,773
1,534
11,026
3,685
20
1,306
2,854
14,731
1 Insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features (‘DPF’) can give policyholders the contractual
right to receive, as a supplement to their guaranteed benefits, additional benefits that may be a significant portion of the total
contractual benefits, but whose amount and timing is determined by HSBC. These additional benefits are contractually based on the
performance of a specified pool of contracts or assets, or the profit of the company issuing the contracts. The increase in investment
contracts with DPF resulted from the acquisition in March 2007 of the remaining 50.01 per cent share in HSBC Assurances, the French
insurance business, that the Group did not already own, resulting in the consolidation of the assets and liabilities of HSBC Assurances.
2 Although investment contracts with DPF are financial investments, HSBC continues to account for them as insurance contracts as
permitted by IFRS 4.
(Audited)
The liabilities for long-term contracts are set by
reference to a range of assumptions which include
lapse and surrender rates, mortality and expense
levels. These assumptions are typically set by
reference to the entity’s own experience. Economic
assumptions, such as investment returns and interest
rates, are typically set by reference to market
observable data.
The above table of liabilities to life insurance
policyholders provides an overall summary of
HSBC’s life insurance activity. In particular, the
table highlights that the most significant products are
investment contracts with DPF issued in France,
insurance contracts with DPF issued in Hong Kong,
annuities issued in North America and Latin
America and unit-linked contracts issued in Europe,
Hong Kong and Latin America.
266
Insurance risk arising from life insurance
depends on the type of business, and varies
considerably. The principal risks are mortality,
morbidity, lapse, surrender and expense levels.
The main contracts which generate exposure to
mortality and morbidity risks are term assurance
contracts and annuities. These risks are monitored on
a regular basis, and are primarily mitigated by
medical underwriting and by retaining the ability in
certain cases to amend premiums in the light of
experience. The risk associated with lapses and
surrenders is generally mitigated by the application
of surrender charges. Expense risk can generally be
managed through pricing. The level of expenses in
the contract will be one of the items considered
when setting premiums rates.
Analysis of non-life insurance risk – net written insurance premiums1
(Audited)
Europe
US$m
Hong
Kong
US$m
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
Latin
America
US$m
America
US$m
Total
US$m
2007
Accident and health ............................................
Motor ..................................................................
Fire and other damage ........................................
Liability ...............................................................
Credit (non-life) ..................................................
Marine, aviation and transport ............................
Other non-life insurance contracts .....................
Total net written insurance premiums ................
27
369
178
–
76
–
30
680
Net insurance claims incurred and movement
in liabilities to policyholders...........................
(598)
2006
Accident and health ............................................
Motor ..................................................................
Fire and other damage ........................................
Liability ...............................................................
Credit (non-life) ..................................................
Marine, aviation and transport ............................
Other non-life insurance contracts .....................
Total net written insurance premiums ................
26
185
221
1
264
1
13
711
Net insurance claims incurred and movement
in liabilities to policyholders...........................
(451)
2005
Accident and health ............................................
Motor ..................................................................
Fire and other damage ........................................
Liability ...............................................................
Credit (non-life) ..................................................
Marine, aviation and transport ............................
Other non-life insurance contracts .....................
Total net written insurance premiums ................
33
192
251
229
225
–
10
940
Net insurance claims incurred and movement
in liabilities to policyholders...........................
(485)
132
15
23
12
–
12
24
218
(90)
97
15
22
13
–
11
24
182
(76)
67
20
34
17
–
16
29
183
(66)
5
10
7
3
–
4
–
29
–
–
2
8
157
–
30
197
25
224
19
34
–
18
24
344
189
618
229
57
233
34
108
1,468
(10)
(79)
(151)
(928)
5
13
5
2
–
3
–
28
–
–
2
8
173
–
37
220
10
157
9
24
–
12
20
232
138
370
259
48
437
27
94
1,373
(11)
(79)
(111)
(728)
3
11
3
2
–
4
–
23
(9)
3
4
5
91
202
–
17
322
6
302
61
14
–
22
12
417
112
529
354
353
427
42
68
1,885
(138)
(196)
(894)
1 Net written insurance premiums represent gross written premiums less gross written premiums ceded to reinsurers.
(Audited)
The above table of non-life net written insurance
premiums provides an overall summary of the
non-life insurance activity of the Group. Motor
business is written predominantly in Europe and
Latin America and represents the largest class of
non-life business in 2007. Fire and other damage to
property business is written in all major markets,
most significantly in Europe. Credit non-life
insurance, which is originated in conjunction with
the provision of loans, is concentrated in the US and
Europe.
The main risks associated with non-life business
are underwriting risk and claims experience risk.
Underwriting risk is the risk that HSBC does not
charge premiums appropriate to the cover provided
and claims experience risk is the risk that portfolio
experience is worse than expected. HSBC manages
these risks through pricing (for example, imposing
restrictions and deductibles in the policy terms and
conditions), product design, risk selection, claims
handling, investment strategy and reinsurance policy.
The majority of non-life insurance contracts are
renewable annually and the underwriters have the
right to refuse renewal or to change the terms and
conditions of the contract at the time.
267
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Insurance risk
l
a
t
o
T
m
$
S
U
4
9
6
1
4
3
1
7
,
3
3
6
1
3
,
8
2
5
9
,
3
2
1
9
4
,
6
6
9
6
3
,
1
5
6
9
,
1
7
8
0
,
2
2
1
9
,
1
7
3
5
0
,
6
1
2
1
3
3
2
6
8
8
8
,
3
6
0
6
,
2
4
2
8
4
,
3
6
0
3
4
,
8
2
1
9
,
1
7
4
s
t
e
s
s
a
r
e
h
t
O
m
$
S
U
5
3
0
3
2
9
9
,
2
9
3
9
,
2
3
8
4
,
1
4
5
9
7
4
,
7
5
6
9
,
1
6
9
1
,
1
r
e
h
t
O
m
$
S
U
–
3
0
1
6
,
1
4
1
7
6
2
5
,
1
3
5
8
,
3
–
–
2
5
–
–
-
t
i
n
U
d
e
k
n
i
l
m
$
S
U
h
t
i
w
3
F
P
D
m
$
S
U
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
C
0
5
2
–
2
6
7
9
7
3
,
2
1
1
9
3
,
3
1
–
–
6
4
3
8
7
0
1
2
,
6
5
0
3
,
2
1
6
9
5
,
8
1
–
–
9
9
3
4
9
6
,
0
1
5
0
9
,
3
7
3
4
,
3
1
5
9
9
,
8
1
–
–
–
2
8
5
8
8
8
,
3
0
7
4
,
4
0
3
4
,
8
–
–
–
2
1
3
–
0
4
6
,
3
–
–
6
–
8
2
3
,
3
5
2
7
,
2
1
–
–
–
1
3
7
,
2
1
3
8
9
,
8
1
7
5
8
,
2
–
–
–
–
3
–
3
8
9
,
8
1
4
5
8
,
2
0
0
9
,
2
1
0
4
6
,
3
1
3
7
,
2
1
3
8
9
,
8
1
7
5
8
,
2
2
2
1
0
3
1
1
7
0
,
1
5
7
1
,
1
3
5
6
9
9
3
,
2
–
3
9
1
5
4
2
,
3
–
–
–
–
9
5
5
8
2
3
6
1
7
4
6
2
3
0
6
,
1
–
4
0
1
1
7
9
,
1
–
–
–
2
2
3
8
5
,
1
5
0
6
,
1
–
5
0
6
,
1
7
3
–
0
1
6
5
6
2
,
1
7
4
0
,
1
7
3
3
9
5
9
,
2
–
0
3
6
2
3
,
3
–
–
m
$
S
U
e
f
i
l
-
n
o
N
m
$
S
U
m
r
e
T
2
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
s
a
m
$
S
U
s
e
i
t
i
u
n
n
A
-
t
i
n
U
d
e
k
n
i
l
m
$
S
U
–
–
2
5
0
2
5
9
9
7
,
5
1
7
3
,
6
–
2
7
5
h
t
i
w
1
F
P
D
m
$
S
U
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
C
–
2
4
2
4
,
3
8
1
5
,
4
6
9
8
,
1
0
4
8
,
9
4
–
5
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
g
n
i
d
a
r
t
t
a
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
d
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
r
e
h
t
o
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
l
a
t
o
T
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
i
e
R
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
F
I
V
P
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
r
e
p
o
r
p
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
d
n
a
s
t
e
s
s
a
r
e
h
t
O
7
0
0
2
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3
t
A
:
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
7
2
1
,
3
9
9
3
,
6
0
6
6
,
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
i
r
e
d
n
u
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
L
3
–
0
3
1
,
3
–
0
3
1
,
3
7
–
6
0
4
,
6
–
6
0
4
,
6
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
a
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
r
e
h
t
O
0
6
6
,
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
t
o
T
–
0
6
6
,
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
l
a
t
o
T
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
d
n
a
y
t
i
u
q
e
l
a
t
o
T
.
9
6
2
e
g
a
p
e
e
s
,
s
e
t
o
n
t
o
o
f
r
o
F
0
3
4
,
6
9
0
9
,
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
t
o
T
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
s
o
c
d
e
s
i
t
r
o
m
a
t
a
d
e
i
r
r
a
c
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
r
e
d
n
u
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
L
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
r
e
d
n
u
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
L
268
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
I
s
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
I
t
c
a
r
t
n
o
c
f
o
e
p
y
t
y
b
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
s
g
n
i
r
u
t
c
a
f
u
n
a
m
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
i
f
o
t
e
e
h
s
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
)
d
e
t
i
d
u
A
(
Insurance contracts
Investment contracts
Contracts
with
DPF1
US$m
Unit-
linked
US$m
Annuities
US$m
Term
assurance2
US$m
Non-life
US$m
Unit-
linked
US$m
Other
US$m
Other
assets4
US$m
Total
US$m
–
–
–
–
117
–
–
39
156
1,418
96
3,842
794
6,150
2
–
2,998
417
–
52
3,467
58
–
366
–
1,223
719
2,308
271
–
950
–
390
138
1,478
773
–
94
–
1,554
712
2,477
665
–
10,041
363
–
222
10,626
–
–
1,597
3
1,441
428
3,469
–
–
974
–
2,173
632
3,818
48
1,549
18,438
879
10,623
3,697
33,793
1,817
1,549
At 31 December 2006
Financial assets:
– trading assets ...............
– financial assets
designated at fair
value ............................
– derivatives ...................
– financial investments ..
– other financial assets ...
Total financial assets .........
Reinsurance assets ............
PVIF5 ................................
Other assets and
investment properties......
538
203
395
356
215
154
204
614
2,679
Total assets ........................
6,690
3,728
2,974
2,607
3,357
10,780
3,673
6,029
39,838
Liabilities under
investment contracts
designated at fair value ...
Liabilities under
investment contracts
carried at amortised
cost .................................
Liabilities under
insurance contracts .........
Deferred tax ......................
Other liabilities .................
–
–
–
–
6,389
–
–
3,685
–
–
Total liabilities ..................
6,389
3,685
Total equity .......................
–
–
–
–
2,773
–
–
2,773
–
–
–
1,864
–
–
1,864
–
–
10,003
3,275
–
13,278
–
2,939
–
–
–
–
–
–
216
–
216
20
–
–
–
403
2,322
17,670
403
2,322
2,939
10,003
3,511
2,725
33,889
–
–
–
5,949
5,949
Total equity and
liabilities7 .......................
6,389
3,685
2,773
1,864
2,939
10,003
3,511
8,674
39,838
1 Discretionary participation features.
2 Term assurance includes credit life insurance.
3 New category disclosed following HSBC’s acquisition of HSBC Assurances. Although investment contracts with DPF are financial
investments, HSBC continues to account for them as insurance contracts as permitted by IFRS 4.
4 Other assets comprise shareholder assets.
5 Present value of in-force long-term insurance contracts and investment contracts with DPF.
6 Do not include assets, liabilities and shareholders’ funds of associated insurance company, Ping An Insurance.
7 Do not include assets, liabilities and shareholders’ funds of associated insurance companies, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
A principal tool used to manage the Group’s
exposure to insurance risk, in particular for life
insurance contracts, is asset and liability matching.
Models are used to assess the effect of a range of
future scenarios on the values of financial assets and
associated liabilities, and ALCOs employ the
outcomes in determining how the assets and
liabilities should be matched. The stresses applied
include factors which impact on insurance risk such
as mortality and lapse rates. Of particular importance
is the need to match the expected pattern of cash
inflows with the benefits payable on the underlying
contracts which, in some cases, can extend for many
years. The table above shows the composition of
assets and liabilities and demonstrates that there was
an appropriate level of matching at the end of 2007.
It may not always be possible to achieve a complete
matching of asset and liability durations, partly
because there is uncertainty over the receipt of all
future premiums and partly because the duration of
liabilities may exceed the duration of the longest
available dated fixed interest investments.
269
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Financial risks
Balance sheet of insurance manufacturing subsidiaries by geographical region
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
Financial assets:
– trading assets ...............................................
– financial assets designated at fair value ......
– derivatives ...................................................
– financial investments ...................................
– other financial assets ...................................
Hong
Kong
US$m
–
6,733
5
6,251
3,259
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
–
796
–
78
197
Europe
US$m
–
22,824
410
13,805
3,345
North
Latin
America
America
US$m
US$m
Total
US$m
–
–
1
2,425
653
94
3,360
–
1,393
862
94
33,713
416
23,952
8,316
Total financial assets ..........................................
40,384
16,248
1,071
3,079
5,709
66,491
Reinsurance assets ..............................................
PVIF1 ..................................................................
Other assets and investment properties ..............
1,095
892
787
48
810
926
28
65
7
83
–
52
115
198
315
1,369
1,965
2,087
Total assets .........................................................
43,158
18,032
1,171
3,214
6,337
71,912
Liabilities under investment contracts
designated at fair value ...................................
11,720
4,285
Liabilities under investment contracts
carried at amortised cost .................................
Liabilities under insurance contracts ..................
Deferred tax ........................................................
Other liabilities ...................................................
Total liabilities ....................................................
Total equity .........................................................
–
24,788
371
3,392
40,271
2,887
–
10,843
143
193
15,464
2,568
48
–
903
12
28
991
180
Total equity and liabilities2 .................................
43,158
18,032
1,171
At 31 December 2006
Financial assets:
– trading assets ...............................................
– financial assets designated at fair value ......
– derivatives ...................................................
– financial investments ...................................
– other financial assets ...................................
–
11,750
720
1,190
689
–
4,120
159
5,621
1,312
Total financial assets ..........................................
14,349
11,212
Reinsurance assets ..............................................
PVIF1 ..................................................................
Other assets and investment properties ..............
1,560
798
619
47
697
1,297
–
733
–
67
108
908
25
54
34
–
–
16,053
–
1,652
–
18
1,670
1,544
3,214
–
–
–
2,433
940
312
4,420
97
257
5,086
1,251
6,337
156
1,835
–
1,312
648
312
42,606
623
3,888
63,482
8,430
71,912
156
18,438
879
10,623
3,697
3,373
3,951
33,793
93
–
273
92
–
456
1,817
1,549
2,679
Total assets .........................................................
17,326
13,253
1,021
3,739
4,499
39,838
Liabilities under investment contracts
designated at fair value ...................................
9,069
4,164
Liabilities under investment contracts
carried at amortised cost .................................
Liabilities under insurance contracts ..................
Deferred tax ........................................................
Other liabilities ...................................................
–
4,624
251
1,475
–
7,084
123
337
Total liabilities ....................................................
15,419
11,708
Total equity .........................................................
1,907
1,545
45
–
790
10
20
865
156
Total equity and liabilities3 .................................
17,326
13,253
1,021
–
–
13,278
–
2,010
–
195
2,205
1,534
3,739
216
3,162
19
295
3,692
807
4,499
216
17,670
403
2,322
33,889
5,949
39,838
1 Present value of in-force long-term insurance contracts and investment contracts with DPF.
2 Do not include assets, liabilities and shareholders’ funds of associated insurance company, Ping An Insurance.
3 Do not include assets, liabilities and shareholders’ funds of associated insurance companies, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
270
Financial risks
(Audited)
HSBC’s insurance businesses are exposed to a range
of financial risks, including market risk, credit risk
and liquidity risk. Market risk includes interest rate
risk, equity risk and foreign exchange risk. The
nature and management of these risks is described
below.
Manufacturing subsidiaries are exposed to
financial risk, for example, when the proceeds from
financial assets are not sufficient to fund the
obligations arising from non-linked insurance and
investment contracts. Certain insurance-related
activities undertaken by HSBC subsidiaries such as
insurance broking, insurance management (including
captive management) and insurance, pensions and
annuities administration and intermediation, are
exposed to financial risk, but not to a significant
extent.
In addition to policies provided for Group-wide
application through the Group Instruction Manuals,
insurance manufacturing subsidiaries may
implement additional risk management procedures
which reflect local market conditions and regulatory
requirements.
In many jurisdictions, local regulatory
requirements prescribe the type, quality and
concentration of assets that HSBC’s insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries must maintain to meet
insurance liabilities. Within each subsidiary, ALCOs
are responsible for ensuring that exposures to
financial risks remain within local requirements and
risk mandates (as agreed with Group Insurance Head
Office), and ensure compliance with the control
framework established centrally through the Group
Instruction Manuals.
The following table analyses the assets held in
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries at
31 December 2007 by type of liability, and provides
a view of the exposure to financial risk:
Financial assets held by insurance manufacturing subsidiaries
(Audited)
Life linked Life non-linked
At 31 December 2007
Non-life
contracts1
US$m
contracts2
US$m
insurance3
US$m
Trading assets
Debt securities ......................................
–
37
Financial assets designated at fair value
Treasury bills ........................................
Debt securities ......................................
Equity securities ...................................
Financial investments
Held-to-maturity:
Treasury bills ........................................
Debt securities ......................................
Available-for-sale:
Treasury bills ........................................
Other eligible bills ................................
Debt securities ......................................
Equity securities ...................................
Derivatives.................................................
Other financial assets7 ..............................
51
7,741
10,386
18,178
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
302
1,282
19,762
–
3,591
8,822
12,413
–
6,253
6,253
2
–
13,677
10
13,689
83
4,376
36,851
22
96
28
6
130
–
144
144
126
176
563
62
927
1
1,175
2,399
Other
assets4
US$m
35
34
2,272
686
2,992
–
408
408
130
172
2,065
164
2,531
30
1,483
7,479
Total5
US$m
94
181
13,632
19,900
33,713
–
6,805
6,805
258
348
16,305
236
17,147
416
8,316
66,491
271
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Financial risks > Market risk
Life linked Life non-linked
contracts1
US$m
contracts2
US$m
At 31 December 2006
Non-life
insurance3
US$m
Trading assets
Debt securities ......................................
–
–
117
Financial assets designated at fair value
Treasury bills ........................................
Debt securities ......................................
Equity securities ...................................
Financial investments
Held-to-maturity:
Treasury bills ........................................
Debt securities ......................................
Available-for-sale:
Treasury bills ........................................
Other eligible bills ................................
Debt securities ......................................
Equity securities ...................................
54
4,304
8,681
13,039
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Derivatives.................................................
Other financial assets7 ..............................
780
274
24
2,492
1,815
4,331
–
5,585
5,585
14
–
1,284
13
1,311
99
2,079
14,093
13,405
55
32
7
94
44
279
323
102
355
738
36
1,231
–
712
2,477
Other
assets4
US$m
39
–
934
40
974
–
333
333
141
145
1,415
139
1,840
–
632
3,818
Total6
US$m
156
133
7,762
10,543
18,438
44
6,197
6,241
257
500
3,437
188
4,382
879
3,697
33,793
1 Comprises life linked insurance contracts and linked long-term investment contracts.
2 Comprises life non-linked insurance contracts and non-linked long-term investment contracts.
3 Comprises non-life insurance contracts.
4 Comprises shareholder assets.
5 Does not include financial assets of insurance manufacturing associate, Ping An Insurance.
6 Does not include financial assets of insurance manufacturing associates, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
7 Comprises mainly loans and advances to banks, cash and intercompany balances with other non-insurance legal entities.
The table demonstrates that for linked contracts,
HSBC typically designates assets at fair value. For
non-linked contracts, the classification of the assets
is driven by the nature of the underlying contract.
The table also shows that approximately
55.4 per cent of financial assets was invested in debt
securities at 31 December 2007 (2006: 51.9 per cent)
with 30.3 per cent (2006: 31.8 per cent) invested in
equity securities.
In life linked insurance, premium income less
charges levied is invested in a portfolio of assets.
HSBC manages the financial risk of this product on
behalf of the policyholders by holding appropriate
assets in segregated funds or portfolios to which the
liabilities are linked. HSBC typically retains some
exposure to market risk as the market value of the
linked assets influences the fees charged by HSBC
and thereby affects the recoverability of expenses
incurred by the Group in managing the product. The
assets held to support life linked liabilities
represented 29.7 per cent of the total financial assets
of HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries at
the end of 2007 (2006: 41.7 per cent).
Market risk
(Audited)
Insurance and investment products manufactured by
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries
typically comprise features or combinations of
features which may not be easily or exactly
replicated by investments. Market risk arises from
the mismatch between product liabilities and the
investment assets which back them. For example,
interest rate risk arises from the mismatch between
asset and liability yields and maturities.
Description of market risks
(Audited)
The main features of products manufactured by
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries which
generate market risks, and the market risks to which
these features expose the subsidiaries, are discussed
in the sections which follow.
Long-term insurance or investment products
may incorporate investment return guarantees,
divided into the following categories:
272
•
•
•
•
annuities in payment;
deferred annuities: these consist of two phases
– the savings and investing phase, and the
retirement income phase;
annual return: the annual return is guaranteed to
be no lower than a specified rate. This may be
the return credited to the policyholder every
year, or the average annual return credited to the
policyholder over the life of the policy, which
may occur on the maturity date or the surrender
date of the contract;
capital: policyholders are guaranteed to receive
no less than the premiums paid plus declared
bonuses less expenses; and
• market performance: policyholders receive an
investment return which is guaranteed to be
Liabilities to policyholders
(Audited)
within a prescribed range of average investment
returns earned by predetermined market
participants on the specified product.
Subsidiaries manufacturing products with
guarantees are usually exposed to falls in market
interest rates as these result in lower yields on the
assets supporting guaranteed investment returns
payable to policyholders.
The table below shows, in respect of each
category of guarantee, the total liabilities to
policyholders established for guaranteed products,
the range of investment returns (net of operating
costs) implied by the guarantees, and the range of
current yields of the investment portfolios supporting
the guarantees.
2007
Investment
returns
implied by
guarantee1
%
Liabilities
to policy-
holders
US$m
Annuities in payment ..........................................
Deferred annuities ..............................................
Deferred annuities ..............................................
Annual return ......................................................
Annual return ......................................................
Capital .................................................................
Market performance3 ..........................................
716
116
609
12,875
352
11,311
3,605
0.0 – 8.5
0.0 – 6.0
6.0 – 9.0
0.0 – 4.5
4.5 – 6.0
0.0
n/a
2006
Investment
returns
implied by
guarantee2
%
Liabilities
to policy-
holders
US$m
1,240
420
640
6,379
508
1,196
3,723
0.0 – 7.0
0.0 – 6.0
6.0 – 9.0
0.0 – 3.0
3.0 – 6.0
0.0
n/a
Current
yields
%
5.1 – 18.1
3.8 – 8.6
5.7
3.2 – 8.7
3.2 – 8.5
3.8 – 4.8
n/a
Current
yields
%
5.2 – 18.6
3.9 – 8.6
5.7
3.3 – 4.5
3.8 – 7.9
2.9 – 4.1
n/a
1 Does not include guarantees from associate insurance company Ping An Insurance.
2 Does not include guarantees from associate insurance companies, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
3 There is no specific investment return implied by market performance guarantees because the guarantees are expressed as lying within
prescribed ranges of average market returns.
A certain number of these products have been
discontinued, including the US$609 million deferred
annuity portfolio in HSBC Finance where, as
highlighted in the above table, the current portfolio
yield is less than the guarantee. On acquisition of
this block of business by HSBC Finance, a provision
was established to mitigate the shortfall in yields.
There has been no further deterioration in the
shortfall since acquisition. There are a limited
number of additional contracts where the current
portfolio yield is less than the guarantee implied by
the contract.
Long-term insurance and investment products
typically permit the policyholder to surrender the
policy or let it lapse at any time. When the surrender
value is not linked to the value realised from the sale
of the associated supporting assets, the subsidiary is
exposed to market risk. In particular, when asset
values fall and customers seek to surrender their
policies, assets may have to be sold at a loss to fund
redemptions.
Insurance and investment products with DPF are
primarily invested in bonds, but a proportion of their
investment portfolios is allocated to equity securities
in order to provide customers with potentially
enhanced returns. Subsidiaries with portfolios of
such products are exposed to falls in the market price
of equity securities when the risk cannot be managed
through the discretionary bonus policy.
A subsidiary holding a portfolio of long-term
insurance and investment products, especially with
DPF, may attempt to reduce exposure to one
particular market by investing in assets in countries
other than the country in which it is based. These
assets may be denominated in currencies other than
the subsidiary’s local currency. It is often not cost
effective to hedge the foreign exchange exposure of
273
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Financial risks > Market risk / Credit risk
these assets and the subsidiary will be exposed to a
strengthening of its local currency against the
currency of the related assets.
For unit-linked contracts, market risk is
substantially borne by the policyholder. HSBC
typically retains an exposure to market risk as the
market value of the linked assets influences the fees
HSBC earns for managing them.
How the risks are managed
(Audited)
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries
manage market risk by using some or all of the
techniques relevant to the contracts being written by
the subsidiary. The techniques applied may include:
•
•
•
for products with DPF, adjusting bonus rates to
manage the liabilities to policyholders. The
management of bonus rates is achieved by
regularly evaluating their sustainability. In
practice, this means that a portion of the market
risk is borne by the policyholder;
as far as possible, matching assets to liabilities.
For example, for products with annual return or
capital guarantees, HSBC invests in bonds
which produce a return at least equal to the
investment return implied by the guarantee;
using derivatives, in a limited number of
instances;
• when designing new products with investment
guarantees, evaluating the cost of the guarantee
and considering this cost when determining the
premium level or the price structure;
•
•
including features designed to mitigate market
risk in new products, for example, surrender
penalty charges to recoup losses incurred when
policyholders surrender their policies; and
exiting investment portfolios when the level of
risk is no longer acceptable.
Each insurance manufacturing subsidiary is
required to have a market risk mandate which
specifies the investment instruments in which it is
permitted to invest and the maximum quantum of
market risk which it is permitted to retain. It is the
responsibility of the local ALCO to ensure that its
mandate is consistent with local regulations. All
mandates must be reviewed and agreed annually
with Group Insurance Head Office, and aggregate
limits are approved by the Risk Management
Meeting of the Group Management Board.
274
How the exposures to risks are measured
(Audited)
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries
monitor exposures against mandated limits regularly
and report these quarterly to Group Insurance Head
Office. Exposures are aggregated and reported to
senior risk management forums in the Group,
including the Group Insurance Market and Liquidity
Risk Meeting, Group Insurance Risk Committee and
the Group Stress Test Review Group.
The standard measures used to quantify the
market risks are as follows:
•
•
•
for interest rate risk, the sensitivities of the net
present values of asset and expected liability
cash flows, in total and by currency, to a one
basis point parallel upward shift in the discount
curves used to calculate the net present values;
for equity price risk, the total market value of
equity holdings and the market value of equity
holdings by region and country; and
for foreign exchange rate risk, the total net short
foreign exchange position and the net foreign
exchange positions by currency.
Although these measures are relatively
straightforward to calculate and aggregate, there are
limitations. The most significant limitation is that the
one basis point parallel shift in yield curves measure
does not capture the non-linear relationships between
the value of certain assets and liabilities and interest
rates which arise, for example, from investment
return guarantees, and certain product features such
as the ability of policyholders to surrender their
policies. If the yields on investments held to support
contracts with guarantees are below the investment
return implied by the guarantee, shortfalls will fall to
the account of HSBC.
HSBC recognises these limitations and
augments its standard measures with stress tests
which examine the effect of a range of market rate
scenarios on the aggregated profits of the insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries for the year and their net
assets. A quarterly process was introduced for
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries during
2007 to report stress tests to Group Insurance Head
Office, where the reports are consolidated and
reviewed by the Group Insurance Market and
Liquidity Risk Meeting and the Group Stress Test
Review Group.
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries
identify those assets and liabilities whose values in
the financial statements are sensitive to each
category of market risk and revalue them assuming
different market rates. The outcome of the exercise
is measured in terms of the change in profit after tax
and net assets under the stress-tested assumptions,
after taking into consideration tax and accounting
treatments where material and relevant.
The following table illustrates the effect on the
aggregated profit for the year and net assets under
various interest rate, equity price, foreign exchange
rate and credit spread scenarios. Where appropriate,
the impact of the stress on the PVIF is included in
the results of the stress tests. The relationship
between the value of certain assets and liabilities and
the risk factors may be non-linear and, therefore, the
results disclosed cannot be extrapolated to measure
sensitivities to different levels of stress. The
sensitivities are stated before allowance for the effect
of management actions which may mitigate changes
in market rates, and for any factors such as
policyholder behaviour that may change in response
to changes in market risk.
Sensitivity of HSBC’s insurance subsidiaries to risk factors
(Audited)
2007
Impact on
profit for
the year
US$m
Impact on
net assets
US$m
2006
Impact on
profit for
the year
US$m
Impact on
net assets
US$m
+ 100 basis points parallel shift in yield curves ...........
– 100 basis points parallel shift in yield curves ...........
10 per cent increase in equity prices ............................
10 per cent decrease in equity prices ............................
10 per cent increase in US dollar exchange rate
compared to all currencies .......................................
10 per cent decrease in US dollar exchange rate
compared to all currencies .......................................
Sensitivity to credit spread increases ...........................
67
(71)
147
(145)
12
(12)
(15)
(29)
49
151
(149)
12
(12)
(30)
(13)
24
93
(86)
(10)
10
(7)
(111)
103
95
(87)
(10)
10
(12)
The sensitivity of the net profit of HSBC’s
insurance subsidiaries to the effects of increases in
credit spreads is a fall of US$15 million (2006:
US$7 million fall). The sensitivity is expressed on an
after tax basis consistent with the other sensitivities
noted above and has been calculated using simplified
assumptions based on one-day movement in credit
spreads over a two-year period. A confidence level
of 99 per cent, consistent with the Group’s VAR, has
been applied. The impact of movements in credit
spreads has become more significant in 2007 due to
increased volatility in credit spreads.
Credit risk
(Audited)
Credit risk can give rise to losses through default
and can lead to volatility in income statement and
balance sheet figures through movements in credit
spreads, principally on the US$29.8 billion (2006:
US$14.1 billion) non-linked bond portfolio. The
exposure of the income statement to the effect of
changes in credit spreads is small (see the table
above). 36 per cent of the financial assets held by
insurance subsidiaries are classified as either held to
maturity or available for sale, and consequently any
changes in the fair value of these financial
investments would have no impact on the profit
after tax.
HSBC’s exposure to credit risk in its insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries primarily arises from
their portfolios of invested assets held, their
reinsurance transactions and any credit protection
products they write.
HSBC sells certain unit-linked life insurance
contracts via a co-insurance agreement with a third
party. The insurance contracts issued under the
co-insurance agreement include market return
guarantees, which are underwritten by the third
party. HSBC has a credit risk exposure arising on the
guarantees were the counterparty unable to meet the
terms of the guarantees. At 31 December 2007, the
exposure to the counterparty was small.
The exposure to credit risk products and the
management of the risks associated with credit
protection products are included in the analyses of
life and non-life insurance risk from page 266 to
267.
Management of HSBC’s insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries is responsible for the
credit risk, quality and performance of their
investment portfolios. Investment credit mandates
and limits are set locally by the insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries and approved by their
local insurance ALCO and Credit Risk function
before receiving concurrence centrally from Group
Credit Risk. The form and content of the mandates
275
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Financial risks > Credit risk
accord with centrally set investment credit risk
guidance regarding credit quality, industry sector
concentration and liquidity restrictions, but allow
for local regulatory and country-specific conditions.
The assessment of creditworthiness of issuers
and counterparties is based primarily upon
internationally recognised credit ratings and other
publicly available information.
Investment credit exposures are monitored
against limits by the local insurance manufacturing
subsidiaries, and are aggregated and reported to
HSBC’s Group Credit Risk function, the Group
Insurance Credit Risk Meeting and the Group
Insurance Risk Committee.
Stress testing is performed by Group Insurance
Head Office on the investment credit exposures
using credit spread sensitivities and default
probabilities. The stresses are reported to the
Group Insurance Credit Risk Committee.
Credit quality
(Audited)
The following table presents the analysis of treasury
bills, other eligible bills and debt securities within
HSBC’s insurance business by rating agency
designation based on Standard & Poor’s ratings
or equivalent. Only assets supporting non-linked
liabilities are included in the table since financial
risk on assets supporting linked liabilities is
predominantly borne by the policyholder.
The table indicates that 72.3 per cent (2006:
74.5 per cent) of the assets included in the table are
invested in AA or AAA rated investments.
Treasury bills, other eligible bills and debt securities in HSBC’s insurance subsidiaries
(Audited)
Treasury
bills
US$m
Other eligible
bills
US$m
Debt
securities
US$m
At 31 December 2007
Supporting liabilities under non-linked insurance
and investment contracts
AAA .........................................................................
AA– to AA+ .............................................................
A– to A+ ...................................................................
Lower than A– ..........................................................
Unrated .....................................................................
Supporting shareholders’ funds1
AAA .........................................................................
AA– to AA+ .............................................................
A– to A+ ...................................................................
Lower than A– ..........................................................
Unrated .....................................................................
Total2
AAA .........................................................................
AA– to AA+ .............................................................
A– to A+ ...................................................................
Lower than A– ..........................................................
Unrated .....................................................................
Of which issued by:
– governments ..........................................................
– local authorities .....................................................
– asset-backed securities ..........................................
– corporates and other ..............................................
Of which classified as:
– trading assets .........................................................
– financial instruments designated at fair value .......
– available-for-sale securities ...................................
– held-to-maturity investments ................................
63
113
–
–
–
176
165
7
–
–
–
172
228
120
–
–
–
348
–
–
–
348
348
–
–
348
–
348
114
–
–
96
14
224
118
–
–
39
7
164
232
–
–
135
21
388
388
–
–
–
388
–
130
258
–
388
276
Total
US$m
8,996
8,989
4,115
2,307
308
8,819
8,876
4,115
2,211
294
24,315
24,715
2,082
1,212
786
632
68
4,780
10,901
10,088
4,901
2,843
362
29,095
7,140
175
201
21,579
29,095
94
5,891
16,305
6,805
29,095
2,365
1,219
786
671
75
5,116
11,361
10,208
4,901
2,978
383
29,831
7,528
175
201
21,927
29,831
94
6,021
16,911
6,805
29,831
(Audited)
At 31 December 2006
Supporting liabilities under non-linked insurance
and investment contracts
AAA .........................................................................
AA– to AA+ .............................................................
A– to A+ ...................................................................
Lower than A– ..........................................................
Unrated .....................................................................
Supporting shareholders’ funds1
AAA .........................................................................
AA– to AA+ .............................................................
A– to A+ ...................................................................
Lower than A– ..........................................................
Unrated .....................................................................
Total3
AAA .........................................................................
AA– to AA+ .............................................................
A– to A+ ...................................................................
Lower than A– ..........................................................
Unrated .....................................................................
Of which issued by:
– governments ..........................................................
– local authorities .....................................................
– asset-backed securities ..........................................
– corporates and other ..............................................
Of which classified as:
– trading assets .........................................................
– financial instruments designated at fair value .......
– available-for-sale securities ...................................
– held-to-maturity investments ................................
Treasury
bills
US$m
Other eligible
bills
US$m
Debt
securities
US$m
Total
US$m
4,238
4,204
1,880
667
132
11,121
1,174
911
692
201
29
3,007
5,412
5,115
2,572
868
161
3,876
3,994
1,880
667
110
10,527
918
903
692
180
28
2,721
4,794
4,897
2,572
847
138
13,248
14,128
2,825
69
223
10,131
13,248
156
3,458
3,437
6,197
13,248
3,205
69
223
10,631
14,128
156
3,537
4,194
6,241
14,128
217
–
–
–
22
239
119
–
–
21
1
141
336
–
–
21
23
380
380
–
–
–
380
–
79
257
44
380
145
210
–
–
–
355
137
8
–
–
–
145
282
218
–
–
–
500
–
–
–
500
500
–
–
500
–
500
1 Shareholders’ funds comprise solvency and unencumbered assets.
2 Does not include treasury bills, other eligible bills and debt securities held by insurance manufacturing associate, Ping An Insurance.
3 Does not include treasury bills, other eligible bills and debt securities held by insurance manufacturing associates, HSBC Assurances
and Ping An Insurance.
(Audited)
Credit risk also arises when part of the insurance
risk incurred by HSBC is assumed by reinsurers. The
credit risk exposure for reinsurers is monitored by
Group Insurance Head Office and is reported
quarterly to the Group Insurance Risk Committee
and the Group Insurance Credit Risk Committee.
The split of liabilities ceded to reinsurers and
outstanding reinsurance recoveries, analysed by
Standard & Poor’s reinsurance credit rating data or
their equivalent, was as follows:
277
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > Financial risks > Liquidity risk
Reinsurance
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007
AAA ..............................................................................
AA– to AA ....................................................................
A– to A+ .......................................................................
Lower than A– ..............................................................
Unrated .........................................................................
Total1 .............................................................................
At 31 December 2006
AAA ..............................................................................
AA– to AA ....................................................................
A– to A+ .......................................................................
Lower than A– ..............................................................
Unrated .........................................................................
Total2 .............................................................................
Reinsurers’ share of liabilities under
insurance contracts
Linked
insurance
contracts
US$m
Non-linked
insurance
contracts
US$m
Total
US$m
Reinsurance
debtors
US$m
7
28
–
22
–
57
10
33
–
15
–
58
33
297
669
10
249
40
325
669
32
249
1,258
1,315
106
812
586
37
170
116
845
586
52
170
1,711
1,769
1
26
16
2
9
54
–
37
5
3
3
48
1 Does not include reinsurers’ share of liabilities under insurance contracts and reinsurance debtors of insurance manufacturing
associate, Ping An Insurance.
2 Does not include reinsurers’ share of liabilities under insurance contracts and reinsurance debtors of insurance manufacturing
associates, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
Liquidity risk
(Audited)
It is an inherent characteristic of almost all insurance
contracts that there is uncertainty over the amount
and the timing of settlement of claims liabilities that
may arise, and this leads to liquidity risk.
To fund the cash outflows arising from claims
liabilities, HSBC’s insurance manufacturing
subsidiaries utilise liquidity primarily from the
following sources:
•
•
•
•
cash inflows arising from premiums from new
business, policy renewals and recurring
premium products;
cash inflows arising from interest and dividends
on investments and principal repayments of
maturing debt investments;
cash resources; and
cash inflows from the sale of investments.
HSBC’s insurance manufacturing subsidiaries
manage liquidity risk by utilising some or all of the
following techniques:
• matching cash inflows with expected cash
outflows using specific cash flow projections or
more general asset and liability matching
techniques such as duration matching;
• maintaining sufficient cash resources;
•
investing in good credit-quality investments
with deep and liquid markets to the degree to
which they exist;
• monitoring investment concentrations and
restricting them where appropriate, for example,
debt issues or issuers; and
•
establishing committed contingency borrowing
facilities.
During 2007, a quarterly process has been
introduced whereby HSBC’s insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries are required to complete
and submit liquidity risk reports to Group Insurance
Head Office for collation and review by the Group
Insurance Market and Liquidity Risk Meeting.
Liquidity risk is assessed in these reports by
measuring changes in expected cumulative net cash
flows under a series of stress scenarios designed to
determine the effect of reducing expected available
liquidity and accelerating cash outflows. This is
achieved by, for example, assuming new business or
renewals are lower, and surrenders or lapses are
greater than expected.
As indicated in the table headed ‘Expected
maturity of insurance contract liabilities’ below and
in the analyses of life and non-life insurance risks on
pages 266 to 267, a significant proportion of the
Group’s non-life insurance business is viewed as
short term, with the settlement of liabilities expected
to occur within one year of the period of risk. There
is a greater spread of expected maturities for the life
business where, in a large proportion of cases, the
278
liquidity risk is borne in conjunction with
policyholders (wholly in the case of unit-linked
business).
The following tables show the expected
undiscounted cash flows for insurance contract
liabilities and the remaining contractual maturity of
investment contract liabilities, respectively, at
31 December 2007.
Expected maturity of insurance contract liabilities
(Audited)
The profile of the expected maturity of the
insurance contracts as at 31 December 2007 has
remained stable compared with 2006. The increase
in the undated investment contract liabilities arises
principally from the incorporation of HSBC
Assurances’ balance sheet as a subsidiary at
31 December 2007.
At 31 December 20071
Non-life insurance ....................................
Life insurance (non-linked) ......................
Life insurance (linked) .............................
At 31 December 20062,3
Non-life insurance ....................................
Life insurance (non-linked) ......................
Life insurance (linked) .............................
Expected cash flows (undiscounted)
Within 1 year
US$m
1-5 years
US$m
1,337
1,887
507
3,731
1,679
1,096
337
3,112
1,352
5,310
1,894
8,556
1,136
4,190
1,162
6,488
5-15 years Over 15 years
US$m
164
15,986
3,644
19,794
118
13,455
2,071
15,644
US$m
1
13,269
5,014
18,284
6
12,646
2,099
14,751
1 Does not include investment contracts by insurance manufacturing associate, Ping An Insurance.
2 2006 balances for life insurance have been restated to ensure a consistent presentation with 2007 balances for this disclosure.
3 Does not include investment contracts by insurance manufacturing associates, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
Remaining contractual maturity of investment contract liabilities
(Audited)
At 31 December 20071
Remaining contractual maturity:
– due within 1 year ...................................................
– due between 1 and 5 years ....................................
– due between 5 and 10 years ..................................
– due after 10 years ..................................................
– undated2 .................................................................
At 31 December 20063
Remaining contractual maturity:
– due within 1 year ...................................................
– due between 1 and 5 years ....................................
– due between 5 and 10 years ..................................
– due after 10 years ..................................................
– undated2 .................................................................
Liabilities under investment contracts by
insurance underwriting subsidiaries
Investment
contracts
with DPF
Other
investment
contracts
US$m
US$m
Linked
investment
contracts
US$m
286
1,234
950
3,386
6,869
12,725
274
1,238
856
3,312
4,323
10,003
331
48
–
44
3,217
3,640
265
45
–
–
3,181
3,491
1
28
–
–
18,954
18,983
–
20
–
–
–
20
Total
US$m
2,854
36,452
11,059
50,365
2,939
31,387
5,669
39,995
Total
US$m
618
1,310
950
3,430
29,040
35,348
539
1,303
856
3,312
7,504
13,514
1 Does not include investment contracts by insurance manufacturing associate, Ping An Insurance.
2 In most cases, policyholders have the option to terminate their contracts at any time and receive the surrender values of their policies.
These may be significantly lower than the amounts shown above.
3 Does not include investment contracts by insurance manufacturing associates, HSBC Assurances and Ping An Insurance.
279
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Insurance operations > PVIF
Present value of in-force long-term
insurance business
(Audited)
Sensitivity of PVIF to changes in economic
assumptions
(Audited)
The HSBC life insurance business is accounted for
using the embedded value approach, which, inter
alia, provides a comprehensive framework for the
evaluation of insurance and related risks. The present
value of the in-force long-term (‘PVIF’) asset at
31 December 2007 was US$2.0 billion (2006:
US$1.5 billion). The present value of the
shareholders’ interest in the profits expected to
emerge from the book of in-force policies at
31 December can be stress-tested to assess the ability
of the life business book to withstand adverse
developments. A key feature of the life insurance
business is the importance of managing the assets,
liabilities and risks in a coordinated fashion rather
than individually. This reflects the greater
interdependence of these three elements for life
insurance than is generally the case for non-life
insurance.
The following table shows the effect on the
PVIF of reasonably possible changes in the main
economic assumptions, changes in the risk-free
and risk discount rates, across all insurance
manufacturing subsidiaries.
It should be noted that, due to certain conditions
that may exist within the contracts, the effects may
be non-linear and so the results of the stress-testing
+ 100 basis point shift in
risk-free rate ..............
– 100 basis point shift in
risk-free rate ..............
+ 100 basis point shift in
risk discount rate .......
– 100 basis point shift in
risk discount rate .......
PVIF at 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
195
(232)
(95)
106
130
(141)
(64)
70
disclosed may not be extrapolated to higher levels of
stress. In calculating the various scenarios, all other
assumptions are held stable except for testing the
effect of the shift in the risk-free rate, when
consequential changes to investment returns, risk
discount rates and bonus rates are also incorporated.
The sensitivities shown are before actions that could
be taken by management to mitigate effects and
before consequential changes in policyholder
behaviour.
The following table shows the movements
recorded during the year in respect of PVIF and the
net assets of insurance operations:
Movements in PVIF and net assets of insurance operations
(Audited)
At 1 January ........................................................
Value of new business written during the year1 .
Acquisitions of subsidiaries/portfolios ...............
Movements arising from in-force business:
– expected return ............................................
– experience variances2 ..................................
– change in operating assumptions ................
Investment return variances ................................
Changes in investment assumptions ...................
Return on net assets ............................................
Disposals of subsidiaries/portfolios ...................
Exchange differences and other .........................
Capital transactions ............................................
PVIF
US$m
1,549
380
390
(175)
53
(86)
–
4
–
–
(150)
–
At 31 December ..................................................
1,965
2007
Net assets
of insurance
operations
US$m
4,400
–
262
–
–
–
–
–
1,235
(250)
59
759
6,465
Total
US$m
5,949
380
652
(175)
53
(86)
–
4
1,235
(250)
(91)
759
8,430
2006
Net assets
of insurance
operations
US$m
PVIF
US$m
1,400
254
–
(233)
31
(17)
13
3
–
–
98
–
3,582
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
752
–
95
(29)
Total
US$m
4,982
254
–
(233)
31
(17)
13
3
752
–
193
(29)
1,549
4,400
5,949
1 Value of net new business during the year is the present value of the projected stream of profits from the business.
2 Experience variances include the effect of the difference between demographic, expense and persistency assumptions used in the
previous PVIF calculation and actual experience observed during the year.
280
Non-economic assumptions
(Audited)
The policyholder liabilities and PVIF are determined
by reference to non-economic assumptions which
include, for non-life manufacturers, claims costs and
expense rates and, for life manufacturers, mortality
and/or morbidity, lapse rates and expense rates. The
table below shows the sensitivity of profit for the
year to, and net assets at, 31 December 2007 to
reasonably possible changes in these non-economic
assumptions at 31 December 2007 across all
insurance manufacturing subsidiaries, with
comparatives for 2006.
Claims costs is a risk associated with non-life
insurance business. If the cost of claims increases, a
negative impact on profit would occur.
Mortality and morbidity risk is typically
associated with life insurance contracts. The impact
of an increase in mortality or morbidity on profit
depends on the type of business being written. For a
portfolio of term assurance contracts, an increase in
mortality would have a negative impact on profit
since the instances of claims would increase. For a
portfolio of annuity contracts, an increase in
Sensitivity analysis
(Audited)
mortality rates typically has a positive impact on
profit as the period over which the benefit is being
paid to the policyholder is shortened. However,
where an annuity contract includes life cover, the
positive impact of reduced future annuity payments
observed through an increase in mortality can be
offset by the benefits payable under the life cover.
Sensitivity to lapse rates is dependent on the
type of contracts being written. For insurance
contracts, the cost of claims is funded by premiums
received and income earned on the investment
portfolio supporting the liabilities. For a portfolio of
term assurance, an increase in lapses typically leads
to a negative impact on profit due to the loss of
future premium income on the lapsed policies. For a
portfolio of annuity contracts, an increase in lapse
rates results in a positive impact on profit as the
period over which the Group is obliged to pay
benefits to the policyholder is shortened.
Expense rate risk is the exposure to a change in
expense rates. To the extent that increased expenses
cannot be passed on to the policyholder, an increase
in expense rates will have a negative impact on
profits.
Effect on profit for the year
to 31 December
Non-life
US$m
Life
US$m
Total
US$m
Effect on net assets
at 31 December
Non-life
US$m
Life
US$m
2007
20% increase in claims costs ..............................
20% decrease in claims costs .............................
10% increase in mortality and/or morbidity
rates .................................................................
10% decrease in mortality and/or morbidity
rates .................................................................
50% increase in lapse rates .................................
50% decrease in lapse rates ................................
10% increase in expense rates ............................
10% decrease in expense rates ...........................
2006
20% increase in claims costs ..............................
20% decrease in claims costs .............................
10% increase in mortality and/or morbidity
rates .................................................................
10% decrease in mortality and/or morbidity
rates .................................................................
50% increase in lapse rates .................................
50% decrease in lapse rates ................................
10% increase in expense rates ............................
10% decrease in expense rates ...........................
(138)
138
–
–
–
–
(6)
6
(118)
118
–
–
–
–
(2)
2
(138)
138
(21)
9
(16)
61
(29)
29
(118)
118
(8)
15
10
22
(23)
23
–
–
(21)
9
(16)
61
(23)
23
–
–
(8)
15
10
22
(21)
21
(138)
138
–
–
–
–
(6)
6
(118)
118
–
–
–
–
(2)
2
–
–
(21)
9
(16)
61
(23)
23
–
–
(8)
15
10
22
(21)
21
281
Total
US$m
(138)
138
(21)
9
(16)
61
(29)
29
(118)
118
(8)
15
10
22
(23)
23
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Capital management and allocation > Capital measurement
Capital management and allocation
equity that are possible with greater leverage.
Capital management
(Audited)
HSBC’s capital management approach is driven by
its strategy and organisational requirements, taking
into account the regulatory and commercial
environment in which it operates. The Group’s
strategy underpins HSBC’s Capital Management
Framework which has been approved by the Group
Management Board. It is HSBC’s policy to maintain
a strong capital base to support the development of
its business and to meet regulatory capital
requirements at all times. It also maintains a strong
discipline over its investment decisions and where it
allocates its capital, seeking to ensure that returns on
investment are appropriate after taking account of
capital costs. In addition, the level of capital held by
HSBC Holdings and other major subsidiaries,
particularly HSBC Finance, is determined by its
rating targets.
HSBC’s strategic intention is to allocate capital
to businesses based on their economic profit
generation and, within this process, regulatory and
economic capital requirements and the cost of capital
are key factors. The responsibility for global capital
allocation principles and decisions rests with the
Group Management Board. Stress testing is used as
an important mechanism in understanding the
sensitivities of the core assumptions in the capital
plans to the adverse impact of extreme, but plausible,
events. Stress testing allows senior management to
formulate management action in advance of
conditions starting to reflect the stress scenarios
identified. The Group has identified the following as
being the material risks faced and managed through
the Capital Management Framework; credit, market,
operational, asset and liability management, pension,
and insurance risks.
In 2007, HSBC continued to manage its capital
against its benchmark minimum tier 1 capital ratio of
8.25 per cent, which it has used under the current
Basel Capital Accord (‘Basel I’) for the purposes of
its long-term capital planning. In 2008, as the Group
operates under the new framework for calculating
minimum capital requirements known as ‘Basel II’,
it will target a tier 1 capital ratio within the range
7.5 to 9.0 per cent, based on core tier 1 capital plus
innovative tier 1 capital, less deductions from tier 1
capital under the FSA’s Basel II disclosure rules.
HSBC recognises the effect on shareholder
returns of the level of equity capital employed within
the Group and seeks to maintain a prudent balance
between the advantages and flexibility afforded by a
strong capital position and the higher returns on
282
The Capital Management Framework covers the
different capital measures within which HSBC
manages its capital in a consistent and aligned
manner. These include the market capitalisation,
invested capital, economic capital and regulatory
capital. HSBC defines invested capital as the equity
capital invested in HSBC by its shareholders.
Economic capital is the capital requirement
calculated internally by HSBC to support the risks to
which it is exposed and is set at a confidence level
consistent with a ‘AA’ target credit rating.
Regulatory capital is the capital which HSBC is
required to hold as determined by the rules
established by the FSA for the consolidated Group
and by HSBC’s local regulators for individual Group
companies.
An annual Group capital plan is prepared and
approved by the Board with the objective of
maintaining both the optimal amount of capital and
the mix between the different components of capital.
The Group’s policy is to hold capital in a range of
different forms and from diverse sources and all
capital raising is agreed with major subsidiaries as
part of their individual and the Group’s capital
management processes. HSBC Holdings and its
major subsidiaries raise non-equity tier 1 capital and
subordinated debt in accordance with the Group’s
guidelines on market and investor concentration,
cost, market conditions, timing, effect on
composition and maturity profile. The subordinated
debt requirements of other HSBC companies are met
internally.
Each subsidiary manages its own capital
required to support planned business growth and
meet local regulatory requirements, within the
context of the approved annual Group capital plan.
As part of HSBC’s Capital Management Framework,
capital generated in excess of planned requirements
is returned to HSBC Holdings, normally by way of
dividends.
HSBC Holdings is primarily a provider of
equity capital to its subsidiaries. These investments
are substantially funded by HSBC Holdings’ own
capital issuance and profit retentions. HSBC
Holdings seeks to maintain a prudent balance
between the composition of its capital and that of its
investment in subsidiaries.
Capital measurement and allocation
(Audited)
The FSA supervises HSBC on a consolidated basis
and, as such, receives information on the capital
adequacy of, and sets capital requirements for,
HSBC as a whole. Individual banking subsidiaries
are directly regulated by their local banking
supervisors, who set and monitor their capital
adequacy requirements. In most jurisdictions, non-
banking financial subsidiaries are also subject to the
supervision and capital requirements of local
regulatory authorities. Since 1988, when the
governors of the Group of Ten central banks agreed
to guidelines for the international convergence of
capital measurement and standards, known as
Basel I, the banking supervisors of HSBC’s major
banking subsidiaries have exercised capital adequacy
supervision within a broadly similar framework.
The FSA implements the capital adequacy
requirements issued by the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision (‘the Basel Committee’) as
implemented by the relevant EU Directives. In June
2006, the EU Capital Requirements Directive
(‘CRD’) was formally adopted by the Council and
European Parliament and it required EU Member
States to bring implementing provisions into force
on 1 January 2007. The CRD recast the Banking
Consolidation Directive and the Capital Adequacy
Directive, which had previously applied.
In October 2006, the FSA published the General
Prudential Sourcebook (‘GENPRU’) and the
Prudential Sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies
and Investment Firms (‘BIPRU’), which took effect
from 1 January 2007 and implemented the CRD in
the UK. GENPRU introduced changes to the
definition of capital and the methodology for
calculating a firm’s capital resources requirements.
BIPRU sets out the FSA’s rules implementing the
other CRD requirements for banks, building
societies and investment firms and groups containing
such firms. Transitional provisions regarding the
implementation of capital requirements calculations
meant that, in general, unless firms notified the FSA
to the contrary, they continued to apply the existing
capital requirements calculations until 1 January
2008; changes that took effect on that date are
described below in the section ‘Basel II’.
In implementing these EU Directives, the FSA
requires each bank and banking group to maintain an
individually prescribed ratio of total capital to risk-
weighted assets, taking into account both balance
sheet assets and off-balance sheet transactions.
HSBC’s capital is divided into two tiers:
• Tier 1 capital comprises core tier 1 capital and
innovative tier 1 securities. Core tier 1 capital
comprises shareholders’ funds, and minority
interests in tier 1 capital, after adjusting for
items reflected in shareholders’ funds which are
treated differently for the purposes of capital
283
adequacy. The book values of goodwill and
intangible assets are deducted in arriving at core
tier 1 capital.
• Tier 2 capital comprises qualifying subordinated
loan capital, collective impairment allowances,
minority and other interests in tier 2 capital and
unrealised gains arising on the fair valuation of
equity instruments held as available-for-sale.
Tier 2 capital also includes reserves arising from
the revaluation of properties.
Various limits are applied to elements of the
capital base. The amount of innovative tier 1
securities cannot exceed 15 per cent of overall tier
1 capital, qualifying tier 2 capital cannot exceed
tier 1 capital, and qualifying term subordinated loan
capital may not exceed 50 per cent of tier 1 capital.
There are also limitations on the amount of
collective impairment allowances which may be
included as part of tier 2 capital. From the total of
tier 1 and tier 2 capital are deducted the carrying
amounts of unconsolidated investments, investments
in the capital of banks, and certain regulatory items.
Changes to the definition of capital came into
force on 1 January 2007. They include the
introduction of proportional consolidation of
banking associates, which previously were either
fully consolidated or deducted from capital, the
relaxation of rules covering the deduction of
investments in other banks’ capital, and a change for
disclosure purposes only to make certain deductions,
previously from total capital, now 50 per cent from
each of tier 1 and tier 2 capital in the published
disclosures. This applies to deductions of
investments in insurance subsidiaries and associates,
but the FSA has granted a transitional provision,
until 31 December 2012, under which any of these
insurance investments that were acquired before
20 July 2006 may be deducted from the total of tier 1
and tier 2 capital instead. HSBC has elected to apply
this transitional provision.
Banking operations are categorised as either
trading book or banking book and risk-weighted
assets are determined accordingly. Banking book
risk-weighted assets are measured by means of a
hierarchy of risk weightings classified according to
the nature of each asset and counterparty, taking into
account any eligible collateral or guarantees.
Banking book off-balance sheet items giving rise to
credit, foreign exchange or interest rate risk are
assigned weights appropriate to the category of the
counterparty, taking into account any eligible
collateral or guarantees. Trading book risk-weighted
assets are determined by taking into account market-
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Capital management and allocation > Basel II
related risks such as foreign exchange, interest rate
and equity position risks, and counterparty risk.
Basel II
(Audited)
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (‘the
Basel Committee’) has published Basel II which
replaces the 1988 Basel Capital Accord. The
supervisory objectives for Basel II are to promote
safety and soundness in the financial system and
maintain at least the current overall level of capital
in the system; enhance competitive equality;
constitute a more comprehensive approach to
addressing risks; and focus on internationally active
banks. Basel II is structured around three ‘pillars’:
minimum capital requirements, supervisory review
process and market discipline. The CRD is the
means by which Basel II is implemented in the EU.
The FSA gives effect to the CRD through GENPRU
and BIPRU, as described above.
Basel II provides three approaches, of
increasing sophistication, to the calculation of
pillar 1 credit risk capital requirements. The most
basic, the standardised approach, requires banks to
use external credit ratings to determine the risk
weightings applied to rated counterparties, and
groups other counterparties into broad categories
and applies standardised risk weightings to these
categories. In the next level, the internal ratings-
based (‘IRB’) foundation approach allows banks to
calculate their credit risk regulatory capital
requirement on the basis of their internal assessment
of the probability that a counterparty will default, but
with quantification of exposure and loss estimates
being subject to standard supervisory parameters.
Finally, the IRB advanced approach, will allow
banks to use their own internal assessment of not
only the probability of default but also the
quantification of exposure at default and loss given
default. Expected losses are calculated by
multiplying the probability of default by the loss
given default multiplied by the exposure at default.
The capital resources requirement under the IRB
approaches is intended to cover unexpected losses
and is derived from a formula specified in the
regulatory rules, which incorporates these factors
and other variables such as maturity and correlation.
For credit risk, with FSA approval, HSBC has
adopted the IRB advanced approach to Basel II
for the majority of its business with effect from
1 January 2008, with the remainder on either IRB
foundation or standardised approaches. A rollout
plan is in place to extend coverage of the advanced
approach over the next three years, leaving a small
residue of exposures on the standardised approach.
284
Basel II also introduces capital requirements for
operational risk and, again, contains three levels of
sophistication. The capital required under the basic
indicator approach is a simple percentage of gross
revenues, whereas under the standardised approach
it is one of three different percentages of gross
revenues allocated to each of eight defined business
lines. Finally, the advanced measurement approach
uses banks’ own statistical analysis and modelling
of operational risk data to determine capital
requirements. HSBC has adopted the standardised
approach to the determination of Group operational
risk capital requirements.
The basis of calculating capital changed with
effect from 1 January 2008 and the effect on both
tier 1 capital and total capital is shown in the table
below, ‘Impact of Basel II’. The Group’s capital
base is reduced compared with Basel I by the extent
to which expected losses exceed the total of
individual and collective impairment allowances
on IRB portfolios. These collective impairment
allowances are no longer eligible for inclusion in
tier 2 capital.
For disclosure purposes, this excess of expected
losses over total impairment allowances in IRB
portfolios is deducted 50 per cent from tier 1 and
50 per cent from tier 2 capital. In addition, a tax
credit adjustment is made to tier 1 capital to reflect
the tax consequences insofar as they impact on the
availability of tier 1 capital to cover risks or losses.
Expected losses, derived under Basel II rules,
represent losses that would be expected in the
scenario of a severe downturn over a 12-month
period. This definition differs from loan impairment
allowances, which only address losses incurred
within lending portfolios at the balance sheet date
and are not permitted to recognise the additional
level of conservatism that the regulatory measure
requires through reflecting a downturn scenario. For
rapidly revolving consumer credit portfolios such as
credit cards, therefore, impairment allowances only
capture some of the expected losses predicted over
the next 12 months. These portfolios turn over three
to four times per year, and therefore a large
proportion of expected losses relate to credit
advances not made at the measurement date.
The effect of the deduction of the difference
between expected losses and total impairment
allowances is to set the total effect on capital to be
equal to the regulatory definition of expected losses.
Because expected losses are based on long-term
estimates and incorporate through-the-cycle
considerations, it is not anticipated that they will be
very volatile. The impact of this deduction, however,
may vary from time to time as the accounting
measure of impairment moves closer to or further
away from the regulatory measure of expected
losses.
The second pillar of Basel II (Supervisory
Review and Evaluation Process) involves both firms
and regulators taking a view on whether a firm
should hold additional capital against risks not
covered in pillar 1. Part of the pillar 2 process is the
Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process
which is the firm’s self assessment of risks not
captured by pillar 1. The pillar 2 process culminates
with the FSA providing firms with Individual
Capital Guidance. The ICG replaces the current
trigger ratio and is set as a capital resources
requirement higher than that required under pillar 1,
generally by a specified percentage.
Pillar 3 of Basel II is related to market discipline
and aims to make firms more transparent by
requiring them to publish specific, prescribed details
of their risks, capital and risk management under the
Source and application of tier 1 capital – Basel I
(Audited)
Basel II framework. HSBC will provide qualitative
pillar 3 disclosures during 2008, with the first full set
of pillar 3 disclosures including quantitative tables,
being made during the first half of 2009 as of
31 December 2008.
For individual banking subsidiaries, the timing
and manner of implementing Basel II varies by
jurisdiction according to requirements set by local
banking supervisors. Applying Basel II across
HSBC’s geographically diverse businesses, which
operate in a large number of different regulatory
environments, presents a significant logistical
and technological challenge, involving an extensive
programme of implementation.
Basel II allows local regulators to exercise
discretion in a number of areas. The extent to which
their requirements diverge, coupled with how the
FSA and the local regulators in the other countries in
which HSBC operates interact, are key factors in
completing implementation of Basel II locally.
Movement in tier 1 capital
At 1 January .........................................................................................................................................
Consolidated profits attributable to shareholders of the parent company ..........................................
Dividends .............................................................................................................................................
Add back: shares issued in lieu of dividends ..................................................................................
Increase in goodwill and intangible assets deducted ..........................................................................
Ordinary shares issued .........................................................................................................................
Other (including exchange differences) ..............................................................................................
2007
US$m
87,842
19,133
(10,241)
4,351
(2,366)
477
5,771
At 31 December ...................................................................................................................................
104,967
Movement in risk-weighted assets
(Unaudited)
At 1 January .........................................................................................................................................
Movements ..........................................................................................................................................
938,678
185,104
At 31 December ...................................................................................................................................
1,123,782
2006
US$m
74,403
15,789
(8,769)
2,525
(3,668)
1,015
6,547
87,842
827,164
111,514
938,678
285
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Capital management and allocation > RWAs
Capital structure at 31 December – Basel I
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
Composition of regulatory capital
(Audited)
Tier 1 capital
Shareholders’ equity ........................................................................................................................
Minority interests and preference shares ........................................................................................
Innovative tier 1 securities ..............................................................................................................
Less:
Goodwill capitalised and intangible assets .................................................................................
Other regulatory adjustments1 ....................................................................................................
Total qualifying tier 1 capital ..........................................................................................................
Tier 2 capital
Reserves arising from revaluation of property and unrealised gains on
available-for-sale equities ...........................................................................................................
Collective impairment allowances ..................................................................................................
Perpetual subordinated debt ............................................................................................................
Term subordinated debt ...................................................................................................................
Minority and other interests in tier 2 capital ...................................................................................
Total qualifying tier 2 capital before deductions ............................................................................
Unconsolidated investments2 ..........................................................................................................
Investments in capital of other banks ..............................................................................................
Other deductions .............................................................................................................................
Total regulatory capital ...................................................................................................................
128,160
6,240
10,512
(38,855)
(1,090)
104,967
4,393
14,047
3,114
37,658
300
59,512
(11,092)
–
(747)
152,640
Risk-weighted assets
(Unaudited)
Banking book .......................................................................................................................................
Trading book ........................................................................................................................................
1,020,747
103,035
Total .....................................................................................................................................................
1,123,782
Risk-weighted assets were included in the totals above in respect of:
– contingent liabilities .....................................................................................................................
– commitments ................................................................................................................................
Capital ratios
(Unaudited)
Total capital .........................................................................................................................................
Tier 1 capital ........................................................................................................................................
51,731
65,068
%
13.6
9.3
108,352
7,413
9,932
(36,489)
(1,366)
87,842
2,982
11,077
3,396
30,677
425
48,557
(7,512)
(1,419)
(394)
127,074
857,198
81,480
938,678
44,704
58,569
%
13.5
9.4
1 Includes removal of the fair value gains and losses, net of deferred tax, arising from the credit spreads on debt issued by HSBC Holdings
and its subsidiaries and designated at fair value.
2 Mainly comprises investments in insurance entities.
HSBC complied with the FSA’s capital
adequacy requirements throughout 2007 and 2006.
Tier 1 capital increased by US$17.1 billion. Retained
profits contributed US$8.9 billion, shares issued,
including shares issued in lieu of dividends,
contributed US$4.8 billion and exchange differences
added US$5.5 billion. These increases were partly
offset by an increase in goodwill and intangible
assets, which are deducted from capital,
of US$2.4 billion, and are mainly due to the
weakening of the US dollar against the pound
sterling and the euro.
Total risk-weighted assets increased by
US$185 billion, or 19.7 per cent. Of this increase,
US$95 billion reflects balance sheet growth, mainly
in the loan book. A further US$39 billion arose from
the proportional consolidation of banking associates,
mainly Bank of Communications and Industrial
Bank. The weakening US dollar gave rise to an
increase of US$32 billion while increased trading
book activity contributed US$19 billion.
Risk-weighted assets by principal subsidiary
(Unaudited)
In order to give an indication of how HSBC’s capital
is deployed, the table below analyses the disposition
of risk-weighted assets by principal subsidiary. The
risk-weighted assets are calculated using FSA rules
and exclude intra-HSBC items.
286
Risk-weighted assets – Basel I
(Unaudited)
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation .........................................................................
Hang Seng Bank ............................................................................................................................
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation and other subsidiaries ................................
HSBC Bank .......................................................................................................................................
HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) ....................................................................................
HSBC France .................................................................................................................................
HSBC Bank and other subsidiaries ...............................................................................................
HSBC North America ........................................................................................................................
HSBC Finance ...............................................................................................................................
HSBC Bank Canada ......................................................................................................................
HSBC Bank USA and other subsidiaries ......................................................................................
HSBC Mexico ....................................................................................................................................
HSBC Bank Middle East ...................................................................................................................
HSBC Bank Malaysia ........................................................................................................................
HSBC Brazil ......................................................................................................................................
HSBC Bank Panama ..........................................................................................................................
Bank of Bermuda ...............................................................................................................................
HSBC Holdings sub-group ................................................................................................................
Other ..................................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
256,761
55,043
201,718
423,941
32,942
76,188
314,811
336,998
135,757
50,659
150,582
18,513
25,226
8,601
27,365
7,824
4,133
1,138
13,282
2006
US$m
181,292
43,607
137,685
360,028
26,476
60,406
273,146
317,325
141,589
35,674
140,062
15,406
17,977
7,201
17,666
6,434
4,370
876
10,103
1,123,782
938,678
287
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk (continued)
Capital management and allocation > Impact of Basel II / Biographies > Directors
Impact of Basel II
(Unaudited)
As reflected in the table below, the Group’s capital
base under Basel II is US$19.7 billion lower than
under Basel I. This reduction in the capital base
does not reflect a change in the risk profile of the
underlying portfolios and the Group remains
strongly capitalised.
Capital position under Basel II
The Group’s risk-weighted assets under
Basel II are broadly similar to the Basel I position.
A reduction in the credit risk capital requirement has
been more than offset by the new capital requirement
for operational risk.
The Group’s pro-forma capital position if it had
been reporting on a Basel II basis at 31 December
2007 is as follows:
Basel II
pro-forma
US$m
(Unaudited)
Basel II
pro-forma
%1
(Unaudited)
Composition of regulatory capital
Tier 1 capital
Shareholders’ equity .....................................................................................
Minority interests and preference shares .....................................................
Less :
Goodwill capitalised and intangible assets ..............................................
Other regulatory adjustments2,3 ................................................................
50% of excess of expected losses over impairment allowances .............
Core tier 1 capital .........................................................................................
128,160
6,240
(38,855)
136
(4,508)
91,173
Innovative tier 1 securities ...........................................................................
10,512
Tier 1 capital ratio – management basis ......................................................
Tier 2 capital
Reserves arising from revaluation of property and unrealised
gains on available-for-sale equities .........................................................
Collective impairment allowances4 ..............................................................
Perpetual subordinated debt .........................................................................
Term subordinated debt ................................................................................
Minority and other interests in tier 2 capital ................................................
Total qualifying tier 2 capital before deductions .........................................
4,393
2,176
3,114
37,658
300
47,641
Total qualifying tier 2 capital before deductions plus innovative
tier 1 securities .........................................................................................
58,153
Unconsolidated investments5 .......................................................................
50% of excess of expected losses over impairment allowances ..................
Other deductions ..........................................................................................
Total deductions other than from tier 1 capital ............................................
(11,092)
(4,508)
(747)
(16,347)
Total regulatory capital ................................................................................
132,979
Risk-weighted assets
Credit risk .........................................................................................................
Market risk ........................................................................................................
Operational risk ................................................................................................
Banking book ....................................................................................................
Trading book .....................................................................................................
976,138
45,847
107,466
–
–
Total ..................................................................................................................
1,129,451
8.1
0.9
9.0
4.2
(1.4)
11.8
Basel I
Actual
US$m
(Audited)
128,160
6,240
(38,855)
(1,090)
–
94,455
10,512
4,393
14,047
3,114
37,658
300
59,512
70,024
(11,092)
–
(747)
(11,839)
152,640
(Unaudited)
–
–
–
1,020,747
103,035
1,123,782
1 Percentage of risk-weighted assets.
2 Includes removal of the fair value gains and losses, net of deferred tax, arising from the credit spreads on debt issued by HSBC Holdings
and its subsidiaries and designated at fair value.
3 Includes a tax credit adjustment in respect of the excess of expected losses over impairment allowances.
4 Under Basel II, only collective impairment allowances on loan portfolios on the standardised approach are included in tier 2 capital.
5 Mainly comprises investments in insurance entities.
288
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance
Corporate Governance Report ......................
Directors .......................................................
Adviser to the Board ....................................
Secretary .......................................................
Group Managing Directors ...........................
Group General Managers .............................
Board of Directors ........................................
The Board .................................................
Corporate governance codes ....................
Board committees .....................................
Internal control .........................................
Directors’ interests ....................................
Employees ....................................................
Employee involvement ..............................
Employment of disabled persons ..............
Remuneration policy..................................
Employee share plans ...............................
Subsidiary company share plans ...............
Employee compensation and benefits .......
Corporate sustainability ................................
Investing in sustainability .........................
Community involvement ............................
Health and safety ......................................
Supplier payment policy ...........................
Donations .................................................
Sustainability reporting ............................
Dividends, shareholders and meetings .........
Dividends for 2007 ...................................
Dividends for 2008 ...................................
Communication with shareholders ...........
Notifiable interests in share capital ..........
Dealings in HSBC Holdings shares ..........
Annual General Meeting ...........................
Page
289
289
292
292
292
293
295
295
299
300
304
306
307
308
308
308
309
313
317
318
318
319
319
319
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
321
321
Corporate Governance Report
The information set out on pages 289 to 333 and
information incorporated by reference constitutes the
Corporate Governance Report of HSBC Holdings.
Directors
S K Green, Group Chairman
Age 59. An executive Director since 1998; Group
Chief Executive from 2003 to May 2006. Joined
HSBC in 1982. Chairman of HSBC Bank plc and
HSBC North America Holdings Inc. and HSBC
Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) SA. A Director of
HSBC France and The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation Limited. Group Treasurer from
1992 to 1998. Executive Director, Global Banking
and Markets from 1998 to 2003. Chairman of The
British Bankers’ Association.
* The Baroness Dunn, DBE, Deputy Chairman
(Retiring 30 May 2008)
Age 68. An executive Director of John Swire & Sons
Limited and a Director of Swire Pacific Limited. A
non-executive Director since 1990 and a non-
executive Deputy Chairman since 1992. A member
of the Nomination Committee. A non-executive
Director of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited from 1981 to 1996. A Patron of
the UK Foundation of the University of British
Columbia, a registered charity. A member of the
Hong Kong Association and the Asia Task Force. A
former Senior Member of the Hong Kong Executive
Council and Legislative Council.
* Sir Brian Moffat, OBE, Deputy Chairman
(Retiring 30 May 2008)
Age 69. A non-executive Director since 1998 and a
non-executive Deputy Chairman since 2001. A
member of the Nomination Committee. A non-
executive Director of Macsteel Global BV. Former
Chairman of Corus Group plc and a former member
of the Court of the Bank of England.
M F Geoghegan, CBE, Group Chief Executive
Age 54. An executive Director since 2004. Joined
HSBC in 1973. Chairman of the Group Management
Board. Chairman of HSBC Bank USA, N.A.,
HSBC USA Inc. and HSBC Bank Canada. Deputy
Chairman of HSBC Bank plc. A Director of The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited, HSBC France, HSBC National Bank USA
and HSBC North America Holdings Inc. President of
HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.-Banco Múltiplo from 1997
to 2003 and responsible for all of HSBC’s business
throughout South America from 2000 to 2003. Chief
Executive of HSBC Bank plc from 2004 to March
2006. A non-executive Director and Chairman of
Young Enterprise.
289
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Biographies > Directors
* The Rt Hon the Lord Butler of Brockwell,
KG, GCB, CVO (Retiring 30 May 2008)
Age 70. Master, University College, Oxford. A non-
executive Director since 1998. Chairman of the
Corporate Sustainability Committee and the HSBC
Global Education Trust. A member of the
International Advisory Board of Marsh McLennan
Inc. Chaired the UK Government Review of
Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction in
2004. Secretary of the Cabinet and Head of the
Home Civil Service in the United Kingdom
from 1988 to 1998. A non-executive Director of
Imperial Chemical Industries plc from 1998 to
2 January 2008.
† S A Catz (Appointed 1 May 2008)
Age 46. A non-executive Director with effect from
1 May 2008. President and Chief Financial Officer
of Oracle Corporation. Managing Director of
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette from 1997 to 1999.
Joined Oracle in 1999 and appointed to the Board of
Directors in 2001.
V H C Cheng, OBE
Age 59. Chairman of The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation Limited. An executive Director
since 1 February 2008. Chairman of HSBC Bank
(China) Company Limited and HSBC Investments
(Hong Kong) Limited and a Director of HSBC Bank
Australia Limited. Joined HSBC in 1978. Appointed
a Group General Manager in 1995 and a Group
Managing Director in 2005. A Director of Great
Eagle Holdings Limited and a Member of the
Exchange Fund Advisory Committee of the Hong
Kong Monetary Authority. Vice Chairman of the
China Banking Association from 10 December 2007.
Appointed a member of the National Committee of
the 11th Chinese People’s Political Consultative
Conference (‘CPPCC’), and a senior advisor to the
11th Beijing Municipal Committee of the CPPCC.
Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Hang Seng Bank Limited from 1998 to 2005. A
Director of Swire Pacific Limited from 2005 to
January 2008.
† J D Coombe
Age 62. Chairman of Hogg Robinson plc. A non-
executive Director since 2005. A member of the
Group Audit Committee and of the Remuneration
Committee. A non-executive Director of Home
Retail Group plc. A trustee of the Royal Academy
Trust. Former executive Director and Chief
Financial Officer of GlaxoSmithKline plc and a
former member of the Supervisory Board of Siemens
AG. A former Chairman of The Hundred Group of
Finance Directors and a former member of the
Accounting Standards Board.
† J L Durán
Age 43. Chief Executive of Carrefour SA and
Chairman of its Management Board of Directors. A
non-executive Director since 1 January 2008. Joined
Carrefour SA in 1991. Chief Financial Officer and
Managing Director, Organisation and Systems of
Carrefour SA from 2001 to 2005.
† R A Fairhead
Age 46. Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Financial Times Group Limited and a Director of
Pearson plc. Chairman of Interactive Data
Corporation. A non-executive Director since 2004.
Chairman of the Group Audit Committee. A non-
executive Director of The Economist Newspaper
Limited. Finance Director of Pearson plc from 2002
to June 2006. Former Executive Vice President,
Strategy and Group Control of Imperial Chemical
Industries plc.
D J Flint, CBE, Group Finance Director
Age 52. Joined HSBC as an executive Director in
1995. Non-executive Chairman of HSBC Finance
Corporation. A non-executive Director of BP p.l.c.
and a member of the Consultative Committee of the
Large Business Advisory Board of HM Revenue &
Customs. Chaired the Financial Reporting Council’s
review of the Turnbull Guidance on Internal Control.
Served on the Accounting Standards Board and the
Standards Advisory Council of the International
Accounting Standards Board from 2001 to 2004.
A former partner in KPMG.
A A Flockhart, CBE (Appointed 1 May 2008)
Age 56. Chief Executive Officer of The Hongkong
and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited and
Global Head of Commercial Banking. An executive
Director with effect from 1 May 2008. Joined HSBC
in 1974. A Director of Hang Seng Bank Limited,
HSBC Bank Australia Limited, HSBC Bank (China)
Company Limited, and Chairman of HSBC Bank
Malaysia Berhad. Managing Director of The Saudi
British Bank from 1997 to 1999 and Senior
Executive Vice-President, Commercial Banking,
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. from 1999 to 2002. Chief
Executive Officer, Mexico from 2002 to October
2006. President and Group Managing Director Latin
America and the Caribbean from October 2006 to
20 July 2007. Appointed a Group General Manager
in 2002 and a Group Managing Director in 2006.
290
* W K L Fung, OBE
Age 59. Group Managing Director of Li & Fung
Limited. A non-executive Director since 1998. A
member of the Corporate Sustainability Committee.
Deputy Chairman of The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation Limited. A Director of King
Lun Management Limited. A non-executive Director
of CLP Holdings Limited, Integrated Distribution
Services Group Limited, Convenience Retail Asia
Limited, Shui On Land Limited and VTech Holdings
Limited. A member of the Hong Kong Trade
Development Council. A former non-executive
Director of Bank of Communications Co. Ltd.
Former Chairman of the Hong Kong General
Chamber of Commerce, the Hong Kong Exporters’
Association and the Hong Kong Committee for the
Pacific Economic Cooperation Council.
S T Gulliver (Appointed 1 May 2008)
Age 48. Head of Global Banking and Markets and
HSBC Global Asset Management. An executive
Director with effect from 1 May 2008. Joined HSBC
in 1980. A Director of HSBC Bank plc, HSBC
Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) SA, HSBC USA
Inc. and The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited. A member of the Supervisory
Board of HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt AG. Head of
Treasury and Capital Markets in Asia-Pacific from
1996 to 2002. Head of Global Markets from 2002 to
2003 and Co-Head of Global Banking and Markets
from 2003 to May 2006. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2000 and a Group Managing Director in
2004.
† J W J Hughes-Hallett
Age 58. Chairman of John Swire & Sons Limited.
A non-executive Director since 2005. A member of
the Group Audit Committee and of the Nomination
Committee. A non-executive Director of The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited from 1999 to 2004. A non-executive
Director and formerly Chairman of Cathay Pacific
Airways Limited and Swire Pacific Limited. A
director of China Festival 2008. A trustee of the
Dulwich Picture Gallery and the Esmée Fairbairn
Foundation. A member of the Hong Kong
Association and of the Governing Body of the
School of Oriental and African Studies, University
of London.
† W S H Laidlaw
Age 51. Chief Executive Officer of Centrica plc. A
non-executive Director since 1 January 2008. A
Trustee of RAFT, a medical charity for burns and
reconstructive surgery. A member of the Business
Council for International Understanding. President
and Chief Operating Officer of Amerada Hess
Corporation from 1995 to 2001. Chief Executive
Officer of Enterprise Oil plc from 2001 to 2002.
Executive Vice President of Chevron Corporation
from 2003 to 2006, and a non-executive Director of
Hanson PLC from 2003 to 24 August 2007.
† Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, KCMG
Age 67. Chairman of Anglo American plc. A non-
executive Director since 2001. Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee and a member of the
Corporate Sustainability Committee. A non-
executive Director of Accenture Limited, Saudi
Aramco, a Governor of Nuffield Hospitals and
President of the Liverpool School of Tropical
Medicine. Chairman of the Global Business
Coalition on HIV/AIDS and the Global Compact
Foundation. A former Director and Chairman of The
‘Shell’ Transport and Trading Company, plc and
former Chairman of the Committee of Managing
Directors of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of
Companies.
† G Morgan
Age 62. A non-executive Director since October
2006. A member of the Remuneration Committee.
Non-executive chairman of SNC-Lavalin Group Inc.
A member of the Board of Trustees of The Fraser
Institute and the Energy Advisory Board of
Accenture Limited. A non-executive Director of
HSBC Bank Canada from 1996 until April 2006.
Former Founding President, Chief Executive Officer
and Vice Chairman of EnCana Corporation. A
former Director of Alcan Inc.
† N R N Murthy, CBE (Appointed 1 May 2008)
Age 61. A non-executive Director with effect from
1 May 2008. Chairman and Chief Mentor and former
Chief Executive Officer of Infosys Technologies
Limited. An independent non-executive Director of
Unilever plc and New Delhi Television Limited and
a Director of the United Nations Foundation. An
independent non-executive Director of DBS Bank
Limited until 2 April 2008.
† S W Newton
Age 66. Chairman of The Real Return Group
Limited. A non-executive Director since 2002. A
member of the Group Audit Committee. A member
of the Investment Committee of The Wellcome
Trust, and the Investment Board of Cambridge
University. A Council Member of Imperial College,
291
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Biographies > Senior Management
London, and Chairman of the committee advising
the Council on the College Fund. An advisor to the
Investment Committee of the Royal Marsden NHS
Foundation Trust.
† S M Robertson, senior independent non-executive
Director
Age 66. Non-executive Chairman of Rolls-Royce
Group plc and the founder member of Simon
Robertson Associates LLP. A non-executive
Director since January 2006 and senior independent
non-executive Director since 25 May 2007. A
member of the Nomination Committee. A non-
executive Director of Berry Bros. & Rudd Limited,
The Economist Newspaper Limited and The Royal
Opera House Covent Garden Limited. Chairman of
Trustees of Ernest Kleinwort Charitable Trust. A
trustee of the Eden Project and of the Royal Opera
House Endowment Fund. A former Managing
Director of Goldman Sachs International. Former
Chairman of Dresdner Kleinwort Benson and a
former non-executive Director of Inchcape plc,
Invensys plc and the London Stock Exchange.
† Sir Brian Williamson, CBE
Age 63. Chairman of Electra Private Equity plc. A
non-executive Director since 2002. Chairman of the
Nomination Committee. A non-executive Director of
Resolution plc. A member of the Supervisory Board
of Euronext NV. A Director of Climate Exchange
plc. A senior adviser to Fleming Family and
Partners. Former Chairman of London International
Financial Futures and Options Exchange, Gerrard
Group plc and Resolution Life Group Limited. A
former non-executive Director of the Financial
Services Authority and of the Court of The Bank of
Ireland.
* Non-executive Director
† Independent non-executive Director
Secretary
R G Barber
Age 57. Group Company Secretary. Appointed a
Group General Manager in October 2006. Joined
HSBC in 1980. Company Secretary of HSBC
Holdings plc since 1990. Chairman of the Disclosure
Committee. A member of the Listing Authority
Advisory Committee of the Financial Services
Authority and of the Primary Markets Group of the
London Stock Exchange. Corporation Secretary of
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
Limited from 1986 to 1992 and Company Secretary
of HSBC Bank plc from 1994 to 1996.
292
Adviser to the Board
D J Shaw
Age 61. An Adviser to the Board since 1998.
Solicitor. A partner in Norton Rose from 1973 to
1998. A Director of The Bank of Bermuda Limited,
HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) SA. A
non-executive Director of Kowloon Development
Company Limited and Shui On Land Limited.
Group Managing Directors
A Almeida
Age 51. Group Head of Human Resources. A Group
Managing Director since 25 February 2008. Joined
HSBC in 1992. Appointed a Group General Manager
on 18 June 2007. Global Head of Human Resources
for Global Banking and Markets, Group Private
Banking, Global Transaction Banking and HSBC
Amanah, from 1996 to June 2007.
C C R Bannister
Age 49. Group Managing Director, Insurance. A
Group Managing Director since August 2006. Joined
HSBC in 1994. Appointed a Group General Manager
in 2001. Chairman of HSBC Insurance Holdings
Limited since November 2006. Deputy Chief
Executive Officer, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. from
1996 to 1997 and Chief Executive Officer, Group
Private Banking from 1998 to November 2006.
A A Flockhart, CBE
Appointed an executive Director with effect from
1 May 2008. See page 290.
S T Gulliver
Appointed an executive Director with effect from
1 May 2008. See page 291.
D H Hodgkinson
Age 57. Group Chief Operating Officer. A Group
Managing Director since May 2006 and Director of
The Bank of Bermuda Limited since May 2006.
Chairman of HSBC Bank Middle East Limited since
July 2006. Joined HSBC in 1969. Appointed a
Group General Manager in 2003. Managing Director
of The Saudi British Bank from 1999 to 2003.
Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited from 2003 to
May 2006.
A Hungate
Group General Managers
Age 41. Global Head of Personal Financial Services
and Marketing. Joined HSBC as a Group Managing
Director on 3 September 2007. Formerly Managing
Director, Asia Pacific at Reuters. Worldwide Chief
Marketing Officer of Reuters between 2002 and
2005.
D D J John
Age 57. Chief Executive, HSBC Bank plc. A Group
Managing Director since March 2006. Joined HSBC
Bank plc in 1971. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2000. Deputy Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad
from 1999 to 2002. Chief Operating Officer of
HSBC Bank plc from 2003 to 2005 and Deputy
Chief Executive from 2005 to March 2006.
B P McDonagh
Age 49. Chief Executive Officer, HSBC North
America Holdings Inc. A Group Managing Director
since 21 February 2008. Joined HSBC in 1979.
Appointed a Group General Manager in 2005. Chief
Executive Officer, HSBC Finance Corporation and
Chief Operating Officer, HSBC North America
Holdings Inc. from 2007 to 21 February 2008. Chief
Operating Officer, HSBC Bank USA from 2004 to
2006.
Y A Nasr
Age 53. Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive of
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited since 22 May
2007. A Group Managing Director since 2004.
Joined HSBC in 1976. Deputy Chairman of HSBC
Bank Egypt S.A.E. since 31 May 2007. A Director
of HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) SA
since September 2006. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 1998. President and Chief Executive
Officer of HSBC Bank Canada from 1997 to
1999. President and Chief Executive Officer of
HSBC USA Inc. and HSBC Bank USA from 1999
to 2003. President, HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.-Banco
Múltiplo from 2003 to October 2006.
B Robertson
Age 53. Group Chief Risk Officer. A Group
Managing Director since 25 February 2008. Joined
HSBC in 1975. A Group General Manager since
2003. Head of Global Banking and Markets for
North America from 2003 to 2005. Group General
Manager, Group Credit and Risk from 2005 to
September 2007.
E Alonso
Age 52. Co-Head of Latin America and President
and Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Bank Brasil
S.A.-Banco Múltiplo and South America. Joined
HSBC in 1997. Appointed a Group General Manager
in October 2006.
P Y Antika
Age 47. Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Turkey.
Joined HSBC in 1990. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2005.
R E T Bennett
Age 56. Group General Manager, Legal and
Compliance. Joined HSBC in 1979. Appointed a
Group General Manager in 1998.
N S K Booker
Age 49. Chief Operating Officer, HSBC Finance
Corporation and Chief Operating Officer, HSBC
North America. Joined HSBC in 1981. Appointed a
Group General Manager in 2004.
P W Boyles
Age 52. Chief Executive Officer, HSBC France.
Joined HSBC in 1975. Appointed a Group General
Manager in January 2006.
D C Budd
Age 54. Director, International, HSBC Bank plc.
Joined HSBC in 1972. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2005.
Z J Cama
Age 60. Group General Manager, International
HSBC Holdings plc. Joined HSBC in 1968.
Appointed a Group General Manager in 2001.
T M Detelich
Age 51. President, Consumer and Mortgage
Lending, HSBC Finance Corporation. Joined HSBC
Finance Corporation in 1976. Appointed a Group
General Manager in October 2006.
I M Dorner
Age 53. Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad. Joined HSBC
in 1986. Appointed a Group General Manager in
June 2007.
293
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Biographies > Senior Management / Board of Directors
J D Garner
C M Meares
Age 38. Group General Manager, Personal Financial
Services and Direct Businesses, HSBC Bank plc.
Joined HSBC in 2004. Appointed a Group General
Manager in October 2006.
J L Gordon
Age 55. President and Chief Executive Officer,
HSBC Bank Canada. Joined HSBC in 1987.
Appointed a Group General Manager in 2005.
Age 50. Chief Executive Officer, Group Private
Banking. Joined HSBC in 1980. Appointed a Group
General Manager in November 2006.
W G Menezes
Age 62. Group Executive, Card Services, HSBC
Finance Corporation. Joined HSBC in 1996.
Appointed a Group General Manager in October
2006.
K M Harvey
K Newman
Age 47. Group General Manager and Group Chief
Information Officer. Joined HSBC Finance
Corporation in 1989. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2004.
Age 50. Senior Executive Vice President, Personal
Financial Services, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Joined
HSBC in 1989. Appointed a Group General Manager
in October 2006.
A M Keir
R C F Or
Age 49. Global Co-Head Commercial Banking.
Joined HSBC in 1981. Appointed a Group General
Manager in October 2006.
N L Kidwai
Age 50. Chief Executive Officer, HSBC India.
Joined HSBC in 2002. Appointed a Group General
Manager in October 2006.
M J W King
Age 51. Group General Manager, Internal Audit.
Joined HSBC in 1986. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2002.
P J Lawrence
Age 46. Head of Global Banking and Markets, USA.
President and Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Bank
USA, N.A. and HSBC USA Inc. Joined HSBC in
1982. Appointed a Group General Manager in 2005.
M Leung
Age 55. Global Co-Head Commercial Banking.
Joined HSBC in 1978. Appointed a Group General
Manager in 2005.
A M Mahoney
Age 45. Group General Manager and Head of PFS
Distribution. Joined HSBC in 1983. Appointed a
Group General Manager in November 2006.
Age 58. Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive, Hang
Seng Bank Limited and Director, The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited. Joined
HSBC in 1972. Appointed a Group General Manager
in 2000.
K Patel
Age 59. Group General Manager, Chief Executive
Officer, Africa. Joined HSBC in 1984. Appointed a
Group General Manager in 2000.
R C Picot
Age 50. Group Chief Accounting Officer. Joined
HSBC in 1993. Appointed a Group General Manager
in 2003.
C D Spooner
Age 57. Head of Group Financial Planning & Tax.
Joined HSBC in 1994. Appointed a Group General
Manager in June 2007.
P A Thurston
Age 54. Co-Head of Latin America and President of
HSBC Mexico and Central America. Joined HSBC
in 1975. Appointed a Group General Manager in
2003.
P T S Wong
Age 56. Executive Director, Hong Kong and
Mainland China, The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation Limited. Joined HSBC in
2005. Appointed a Group General Manager in 2005.
294
Board of Directors
The Board
The objective of the management structures within
HSBC, headed by the Board of Directors of HSBC
Holdings and led by the Group Chairman, is to
deliver sustainable value to shareholders.
Implementation of the strategy set by the Board is
delegated to the Group Management Board under the
leadership of the Group Chief Executive.
HSBC Holdings has a unitary Board of
Directors. The authority of each Director is exercised
in Board Meetings where the Board acts collectively
as a unit. At 3 March 2008, the Board comprises the
Group Chairman, Group Chief Executive, two other
executive Directors and 14 non-executive Directors.
The names and brief biographical particulars of the
Directors are listed on pages 289 to 292. The Group
Chairman, Group Chief Executive and two other
executive Directors are employees who carry out
executive functions in HSBC in addition to their
duties as Directors. Non-executive Directors are not
HSBC employees and do not participate in the daily
business management of HSBC. Non-executive
Directors bring an external perspective,
constructively challenge and help develop
proposals on strategy, scrutinise the performance of
management in meeting agreed goals and objectives
and monitor the reporting of performance. The non-
executive Directors have a wealth of experience
across a number of industries and business sectors,
including the leadership of large, complex
multinational enterprises. The roles of non-executive
Directors as members of Board committees are set
out on pages 300 to 304. It is estimated that non-
executive Directors spend 24 days per annum on
HSBC business after an induction phase, with
Committee members devoting significant additional
time.
The Board is responsible for managing the
business of HSBC Holdings and, in doing so, may
exercise all of the powers of HSBC Holdings,
subject to any relevant laws and regulations and to
the Memorandum and Articles of Association. In
particular, the Board may exercise all the powers of
the Company to borrow money and to mortgage or
charge all or any part of the undertaking, property or
assets (present and future) of HSBC Holdings and
may also exercise any of the powers conferred on it
by the Companies Act 1985 and Companies Act
2006 (as appropriate) and/or by shareholders. The
Board is able to delegate and confer on certain
Directors holding executive office any of its powers,
authorities and discretions (including the power to
sub-delegate) for such time and on such terms as it
295
thinks fit. In addition, the Board may establish any
local or divisional boards or agencies for managing
the business of HSBC Holdings in any specified
locality and delegate and confer on any local or
divisional board, manager or agent so appointed any
of its powers, authorities and discretions (including
the power to sub-delegate) for such time and on such
terms as it thinks fit. The Board may also, by power
of attorney or otherwise, appoint any person or
persons to be the agent of HSBC Holdings and may
delegate to any such person or persons any of its
powers, authorities and discretions (including the
power to sub-delegate) for such time and on such
terms as it thinks fit.
The Board sets the strategy for HSBC through
the five-year strategic plan and approves the
operating plans presented by management for the
achievement of the strategic objectives. The
operating plans ensure the efficient disposition of
HSBC’s resources for the achievement of these
objectives. The Board delegates the management
and day-to-day running of HSBC to the Group
Management Board but retains to itself approval of
certain matters including operating plans and
performance targets, procedures for monitoring and
control of operations, the authority or the delegation
of authority to approve credit, market risk limits,
acquisitions, disposals, investments, capital
expenditure or realisation or creation of a new
venture, specified senior appointments, and any
substantial change in balance sheet management
policy.
The Directors who served during the year were,
Lord Butler, R K F Ch’ien, J D Coombe, Baroness
Dunn, R A Fairhead, D J Flint, W K L Fung,
M F Geoghegan, S K Green, S Hintze,
J W J Hughes-Hallett, Sir Brian Moffat, Sir Mark
Moody-Stuart, G Morgan, S W Newton,
S M Robertson, H Sohmen and Sir Brian
Williamson. J F Gil Díaz was appointed a Director
on 2 January 2007 and resigned on 5 March 2007.
The Board of Directors meets regularly and
Directors receive information between meetings
about the activities of committees and developments
in HSBC’s business.
Eight Board meetings were held during 2007.
The table that follows gives details of Directors’
attendance at meetings of the Board, Group Audit
Committee, Nomination Committee and
Remuneration Committee during 2007.
During 2007, the non-executive Directors and
the Group Chairman met twice without the presence
of the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance
Director. In addition, the non-executive Directors
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Board of Directors / The Board
met four times without the Group Chairman
including a meeting to appraise the Group
Chairman’s performance.
In addition to the meetings of the principal
Committees referred to in the following pages,
sixteen other meetings of Committees of the Board
were held during the year to discharge business
delegated by the Board.
All Directors attended the 2007 Annual General
Meeting.
Board Meetings
Group Audit
Committee Meetings
Possible
Nomination
Committee Meetings
Possible
Attended
Remuneration
Committee Meetings
Possible
Attended
Possible1 Attended
Lord Butler ....................
Baroness Dunn ..............
R K F Ch’ien .................
J D Coombe ..................
R A Fairhead .................
D J Flint ........................
W K L Fung ..................
M F Geoghegan ............
J F Gil Díaz4 ..................
S K Green ......................
S Hintze .........................
J W J Hughes-Hallett ....
Sir Brian Moffat ............
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart
G Morgan ......................
S W Newton ..................
S M Robertson ..............
H Sohmen .....................
Sir Brian Williamson ....
Attended
7
8
5
8
6
8
6
8
–
8
5
7
7
8
6
8
7
4
8
8
8
52
8
8
8
8
8
3
8
52
8
8
8
8
8
8
52
8
–
–
2
7
7
–
–
–
–
–
–
6
3
–
–
4
–
–
–
–
–
32
7
7
–
–
–
–
–
–
7
33
–
–
45
–
–
–
–
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
2
–
–
–
1
–
2
–
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
2
–
–
–
2
–
2
–
–
–
8
–
–
4
–
–
–
3
–
–
8
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
–
–
43
–
–
–
42
–
–
8
45
–
–
–
–
1 Includes a meeting called at short notice in February 2007 to discuss a trading update about the mortgage services operation in HSBC
Finance Corporation.
2 Retired as a Director on 25 May 2007.
3 Ceased to be a member on 25 May 2007.
4 Retired as a Director on 5 March 2007.
5 Appointed a member on 25 May 2007.
Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive
The roles of Group Chairman and Group Chief
Executive are separated and held by experienced
full-time Directors.
There is a clear division of responsibilities at the
head of the Company between the running of the
Board and the executive responsibility for running
HSBC’s business. The Group Chairman’s
responsibilities include the long-term strategic
development of HSBC, the development of
relationships with governments and other significant
external parties and performance appraisal of the
Group Chief Executive. The Group Chairman also
monitors the performance of the Group Finance
Director and, subject to the Group Chief Executive’s
recommendation, approves risk, capital allocation
and capital investment decisions within authorities
delegated by the Board. The Group Chief Executive
has responsibility for developing business plans and
delivering performance against these.
S K Green became Group Chairman at the
conclusion of the Annual General Meeting on
26 May 2006 and M F Geoghegan succeeded
296
S K Green as Group Chief Executive. The
appointments were made after consulting with
representatives of major institutional investors and
explaining the succession planning and independent
external search process undertaken. S K Green and
M F Geoghegan stood for re-election at the 2006
Annual General Meeting and were both re-elected
ahead of taking up their new roles from the
conclusion of that Meeting.
Board balance and independence of
Directors
The balance of the Board includes a strong presence
of both executive and non-executive Directors such
that no individual or small group can dominate the
Board’s decision making. Following the 2008
Annual General Meeting, the Board will comprise
19 Directors, 12 of whom are independent non-
executive Directors. The size of the Board is
appropriate given the complexity and geographical
spread of HSBC’s business and the significant time
demands placed on the non-executive Directors,
particularly those who serve as members of Board
committees.
The Board has appointed S M Robertson as the
senior independent non-executive Director. The
principal role of the senior independent non-
executive Director is to support the Group Chairman
in his role, to lead the non-executive Directors in the
oversight of the Group Chairman and to ensure there
is a clear division of responsibility between the
Group Chairman and Group Chief Executive. The
senior independent non-executive Director is also
available to shareholders for concerns which the
normal channels have failed to resolve or are
inappropriate.
The Board considers all of the non-executive
Directors to be independent in character and
judgement. Baroness Dunn, Sir Brian Moffat, Lord
Butler and W K L Fung have served on the Board
for more than nine years, however, and in that
respect only, do not meet the usual criteria for
independence set out in the UK Combined Code on
corporate governance. The Board has therefore
determined S A Catz, J D Coombe, J L Durán,
R A Fairhead, J W J Hughes-Hallett, W S H
Laidlaw, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, G Morgan,
N R N Murthy, S W Newton, S M Robertson, and
Sir Brian Williamson to be independent. In reaching
its determination of each non-executive Director’s
independence the Board has concluded that there are
no relationships or circumstances which are likely to
affect a Director’s judgement and any relationships
or circumstances which could appear to do so were
considered not to be material.
When determining independence the Board
considers that calculation of the length of service of
a non-executive Director begins on the date of his or
her first election by shareholders as a Director of
HSBC Holdings. Given the complexity and
geographical spread of HSBC’s business, the
experience of previous service on a subsidiary
company Board can be a considerable benefit to
HSBC and does not detract from a Director’s
independence.
In accordance with the Rules Governing the
Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited, each non-executive Director
determined by the Board to be independent has
provided an annual confirmation of his or her
independence to HSBC Holdings.
Information, induction and ongoing
development
The Board regularly reviews reports on progress
against financial objectives, on business
developments and on investor and external relations
and receives reports from the Chairmen of Board
297
Committees and from the Group Chief Executive.
The Board receives regular reports and presentations
on strategy and developments in the customer groups
and principal geographical areas. Regular reports are
also provided to the Board, the Group Audit
Committee and the Group Management Board on
credit exposures and the loan portfolio, asset and
liability management, liquidity, litigation and
compliance and reputational issues. The agenda and
supporting papers are distributed in advance of all
Board and Committee meetings to allow time for
appropriate review and to facilitate full discussion at
the meetings. All Directors have full and timely
access to all relevant information and may take
independent professional advice if necessary.
The Directors have free and open contact with
management at all levels. Group Managing Directors
and Group General Managers meet informally with
Directors after Board meetings. Board offsite visits
are made each year to enable Directors to see at first
hand the operations of subsidiary companies in local
environments and to meet management, employees
and customers. In 2007 the Board visited New York
and Curitiba.
Full, formal and tailored induction programmes,
with particular emphasis on internal controls, are
arranged for newly appointed Directors. The
programmes consist of a series of meetings with
other Directors and senior executives to enable new
Directors to receive information and familiarise
themselves with HSBC’s strategy, operations and
internal controls. Prior to their appointment, each
Director receives comprehensive guidance on the
duties and liabilities of a Director of HSBC
Holdings. Opportunities to update and develop skills
and knowledge, through externally run seminars and
through briefings by senior executives, are provided
to all Directors.
Performance evaluation
In November 2007, ICSA Corporate Services
Limited was commissioned to undertake an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Board. This
was to investigate the performance of the Board as a
whole and, in that context, the main Board
committees and individual Directors. The evaluation
examined whether eight key areas met the Board’s
needs and expectations: Board responsibilities;
oversight; Board meetings; information received;
support for the Board; Board composition; working
together; and outcome and achievements. The report
on the evaluation has been reviewed by the Board
and has been used by the non-executive Directors,
led by the senior independent non-executive
Director, in their evaluation of the performance of
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Board of Directors > The Board / Corporate governance codes
the Group Chairman. The review concluded that the
Board and its committees were functioning
effectively. It is the intention of the Board of HSBC
Holdings to continue to review its performance and
that of its Directors annually.
Appointment, retirement and re-election of
Directors
The Board may at any time appoint any person who
is willing to act as a Director, either to fill a vacancy
or as an addition to the existing Board, but the total
number of Directors shall not exceed twenty-five.
Any Director so appointed by the Board shall retire
at the Annual General Meeting following their
appointment and shall be eligible for re-election but
is not taken into account in determining the number
of Directors who are to retire by rotation at such
meeting. The Board may appoint any Director to
hold any employment or executive office and may
revoke or terminate any such appointment.
Shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, appoint a
person as a Director or remove any Director before
the expiration of his period of office. At each Annual
General Meeting, one third of the Directors who are
subject to retirement by rotation are required to retire
and may offer themselves for re-election by
shareholders. In addition to those required to retire by
rotation, any Director who was not elected or re-
elected at either of the preceding two Annual General
Meetings and any non-executive Director who has
served in office for a continuous period of nine years
or more at the date of the Annual General Meeting is
required to retire and may offer him or herself for
re-election by shareholders.
R K F Ch’ien, S Hintze and H Sohmen retired
as Directors at the conclusion of the Annual General
Meeting held on 25 May 2007. J L Durán and
W S H Laidlaw were appointed non-executive
Directors on 1 January 2008. V H C Cheng was
appointed an executive Director on 1 February 2008.
A A Flockhart and S T Gulliver have been appointed
executive Directors, and S A Catz and N R N Murthy
have been appointed non-executive Directors with
effect from 1 May 2008.
S A Catz, V H C Cheng, J L Durán,
A A Flockhart, S T Gulliver, W S H Laidlaw and
N R N Murthy, having been appointed since the
Annual General Meeting in 2007, will retire at the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting and offer
themselves for re-election.
Lord Butler, J D Coombe, Baroness Dunn,
D J Flint, W K L Fung, J W J Hughes-Hallett, Sir
Brian Moffat and S W Newton will retire by rotation
at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting. With
298
the exception of Lord Butler, Baroness Dunn and
Sir Brian Moffat, who are to retire, they offer
themselves for re-election.
None of the non-executive Directors seeking
re-election at the forthcoming Annual General
Meeting has a service contract. Of the executive
Directors who are seeking re-election, D J Flint is
employed on a rolling contract dated 29 September
1995 which requires 12 months’ notice to be given
by the Company and nine months’ notice to be given
by Mr Flint. V H C Cheng and A A Flockhart are
employed on rolling contracts dated 1 October 1978
and 6 July 1974 respectively, which require three
months’ notice to be given by either party.
S T Gulliver is employed on a rolling contract dated
8 December 2005 which requires twelve months’
notice to be given by either party.
Following the performance evaluation of the
Board, the Group Chairman has confirmed that the
non-executive Directors standing for re-election at
the Annual General Meeting continue to perform
effectively and to demonstrate commitment to their
roles.
Brief biographical particulars of all Directors
including those seeking re-election at the Annual
General Meeting, are given on pages 289 to 292.
Relations with shareholders
The Board ensures all Directors, including non-
executive Directors, develop an understanding of the
views of major shareholders through attendance at
analyst presentations and other meetings with
institutional investors and their representative
bodies. The Board also met with representatives of
institutional shareholders in 2007 to discuss
corporate governance matters.
The Group Chairman, Group Chief Executive,
Group Finance Director and other senior executives
hold regular meetings with institutional investors and
report to the Board on those meetings.
As described in the Directors’ Remuneration
Report, a consultation with institutional shareholders
on the framework of Directors’ remuneration and
proposed changes to The HSBC Share Plan began in
January 2008.
S M Robertson, senior independent non-
executive Director since the conclusion of the 2007
Annual General Meeting, and other non-executive
Directors met and corresponded with institutional
investors and their representatives to discuss
strategy, remuneration policy and governance. The
senior independent non-executive Director is also
available to shareholders should they have concerns
which contact through the normal channels of Group
Chairman, Group Chief Executive, Group Finance
Director or other executives has failed to resolve or
for which such contact would be inappropriate.
Invitations to meet S M Robertson prior to his
appointment as senior independent non-executive
Director were extended to the Group’s largest
shareholders. The senior independent non-executive
Director may be contacted through the Group
Company Secretary at 8 Canada Square, London
E14 5HQ.
Indemnification of Directors, relevant audit
information and contracts of significance
The Articles of Association of HSBC Holdings
provide that Directors are entitled to be indemnified
out of the assets of the Company against claims from
third parties in respect of certain liabilities arising in
connection with the performance of their functions,
in accordance with the provisions of the UK
Companies Act 1985. Such indemnity provisions
have been in place during the financial year but have
not been utilised by the Directors.
Each person who is a Director at the date of
approval of this report confirms that so far as the
Director is aware, there is no relevant audit
information of which the Company’s auditor is
unaware; and the Director has taken all the steps that
he or she ought to have taken as a Director in order
to make himself or herself aware of any relevant
audit information and to establish that the
Company’s auditor is aware of that information. This
confirmation is given pursuant to section 234ZA of
the UK Companies Act 1985 and should be
interpreted in accordance therewith and subject to
the provisions thereof.
None of the Directors had, during the year or at
the end of the year, a material interest, directly or
indirectly, in any contract of significance with HSBC
Holdings or any of its subsidiary undertakings.
Corporate governance codes
HSBC is committed to high standards of corporate
governance. HSBC Holdings has complied
throughout the year with the applicable code
provisions of the Combined Code on Corporate
Governance issued by the Financial Reporting
Council and the Code on Corporate Governance
Practices in Appendix 14 to the Rules Governing the
Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited.
The Board of HSBC Holdings has adopted a
code of conduct for transactions in HSBC Group
securities by Directors that complies with The Model
299
Code in the Listing Rules of the Financial Services
Authority and with The Model Code for Securities
Transactions by Directors of Listed Issuers (‘Hong
Kong Model Code’) set out in the Rules Governing
the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited, save that The Stock Exchange
of Hong Kong Limited has granted certain waivers
from strict compliance with the Hong Kong Model
Code, primarily to take into account accepted
practices in the UK, particularly in respect of
employee share plans. Following a specific enquiry,
each Director has confirmed he or she has complied
with the code of conduct for transactions in HSBC
Group securities throughout the year.
Differences in HSBC Holdings/New York
Stock Exchange corporate governance
practices
Under the NYSE’s corporate governance rules for
listed companies, as a NYSE-listed foreign private
issuer, HSBC Holdings must disclose any significant
ways in which its corporate governance practices
differ from those followed by US companies subject
to NYSE listing standards. HSBC Holdings believes
the following to be the significant differences
between its corporate governance practices and
NYSE corporate governance rules applicable to US
companies.
US companies listed on the NYSE are required
to adopt and disclose corporate governance
guidelines. The Listing Rules of the UK Financial
Services Authority require each listed company
incorporated in the UK to include in its Annual
Report and Accounts a narrative statement of how it
has applied the principles of the Combined Code and
a statement as to whether or not it has complied with
the code provisions of the Combined Code
throughout the accounting period covered by the
Annual Report and Accounts. A company that has
not complied with the Code provisions, or complied
with only some of the Code provisions or (in the
case of provisions whose requirements are of a
continuing nature) complied for only part of an
accounting period covered by the report, must
specify the Code provisions with which it has not
complied, and (where relevant) for what part of the
reporting period such non-compliance continued,
and give reasons for any non-compliance. As stated
above, HSBC Holdings complied throughout 2007
with the applicable code provisions of the Combined
Code. The Combined Code does not require HSBC
Holdings to disclose the full range of corporate
governance guidelines with which it complies.
Under NYSE standards, companies are required
to have a nominating/corporate governance
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Board of Directors > Corporate governance codes / Board committees
committee, composed entirely of independent
directors. In addition to identifying individuals
qualified to become Board members, this committee
must develop and recommend to the Board a set of
corporate governance principles. HSBC’s
Nomination Committee, which follows the
requirements of the Combined Code, includes a
majority of members who are independent. All
members of the Committee are non-executive
Directors and three of the five members, including
the Committee chairman, are independent non-
executive Directors. The Committee’s terms of
reference do not require the Committee to develop
and recommend corporate governance principles for
HSBC Holdings. As stated above, HSBC Holdings is
subject to the corporate governance principles of the
Combined Code.
Pursuant to NYSE listing standards, non-
management directors must meet on a regular basis
without management present and independent
directors must meet separately at least once per year.
During 2007, HSBC Holdings’ non-executive
Directors met twice as a group with the Group
Chairman, but without the Group Chief Executive or
Group Finance Director present, and met four times
as a group without the Group Chairman, Group
Chief Executive or Group Finance Director present.
HSBC Holdings’ practice, in this regard, complies
with the Combined Code.
In accordance with the requirements of the
Combined Code, HSBC Holdings discloses in its
annual report how the Board, its committees and the
Directors are evaluated (on page 297) and it provides
extensive information regarding Directors’
compensation in the Directors’ Remuneration Report
(on pages 322 to 332). The terms of reference of
HSBC Holdings’ Audit, Nomination and
Remuneration Committees are available at
www.hsbc.com/boardcommittees.
NYSE listing standards require US companies
to adopt a code of business conduct and ethics for
directors, officers and employees, and promptly
disclose any waivers of the code for directors or
executive officers. In addition to the Group Business
Principles and Values, which apply to the employees
of all HSBC companies, pursuant to the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act the Board of
HSBC Holdings has adopted a Code of Ethics
applicable to the Group Chairman and the Group
Chief Executive, as the principal executive officers,
and to the Group Finance Director and Group Chief
Accounting Officer. HSBC Holdings’ Code of Ethics
is available on www.hsbc.com/codeofethics or from
the Group Company Secretary at 8 Canada Square,
London E14 5HQ. If the Board amends or waives
300
the provisions of the Code of Ethics, details of the
amendment or waiver will appear at the same
website address. During 2007, HSBC Holdings made
no amendments to its Code of Ethics and granted no
waivers from its provisions. The Group Business
Principles and Values are available on
www.hsbc.com/businessprinciplesandvalues.
Under NYSE listing rules applicable to US
companies, independent directors must comprise a
majority of the Board of directors. Currently, over
half of HSBC Holdings’ Directors are independent.
Under the Combined Code the HSBC Holdings
Board determines whether a Director is independent
in character and judgement and whether there are
relationships or circumstances which are likely to
affect, or could appear to affect, the Director’s
judgement. Under the NYSE rules a director cannot
qualify as independent unless the Board
affirmatively determines that the director has no
material relationship with the listed company; in
addition the NYSE rules prescribe a list of
circumstances in which a director cannot be
independent. The Combined Code requires a
company’s Board to assess director independence
by affirmatively concluding that the director is
independent of management and free from any
business or other relationship that could materially
interfere with the exercise of independent
judgement.
Lastly, a chief executive officer of a US
company listed on the NYSE must annually certify
that he or she is not aware of any violation by the
company of NYSE corporate governance standards.
In accordance with NYSE listing rules applicable to
foreign private issuers, HSBC Holdings’ Group
Chief Executive is not required to provide the NYSE
with this annual compliance certification. However,
in accordance with rules applicable to both US
companies and foreign private issuers, the Group
Chief Executive is required promptly to notify the
NYSE in writing after any executive officer becomes
aware of any material non-compliance with the
NYSE corporate governance standards applicable to
HSBC Holdings.
HSBC Holdings is required to submit annual
and interim written affirmations of compliance with
applicable NYSE corporate governance standards,
similar to the affirmations required of NYSE-listed
US companies.
Board committees
The Board has appointed a number of committees
consisting of certain Directors, Group Managing
Directors and, in the case of the Corporate
Sustainability Committee, certain co-opted
non-director members. The following are the
principal committees:
Group Management Board
The Group Management Board meets regularly and
operates as a general management committee under
the direct authority of the Board. The objective of
the Group Management Board is to maintain a
reporting and control structure whereby all of the
line operations of HSBC are accountable to
individual members of the Group Management
Board who report to the Group Chief Executive who
in turn reports to the Group Chairman. The Board
has set objectives and measures for the Group
Management Board. These will align senior
executives’ objectives and measures with the
strategy and operating plans throughout HSBC.
The members of the Group Management Board are
M F Geoghegan (Chairman), V H C Cheng and
D J Flint, who are executive Directors, and
A Almeida, C C R Bannister, A A Flockhart,
S T Gulliver, D H Hodgkinson, A Hungate,
D D J John, B P McDonagh, Y A Nasr and
B Robertson, all of whom are Group Managing
Directors.
The Group Management Board exercises the
powers, authorities and discretions of the Board in so
far as they concern the management and day-to-day
running of HSBC Holdings in accordance with such
policies and directions as the Board may from time
to time determine. Matters reserved for approval by
the Board are described on page 295.
Following each meeting the Group Chief
Executive reports to the Board on the Group
Management Board’s activities.
Group Audit Committee
The Group Audit Committee meets regularly with
HSBC’s senior financial, internal audit, credit, legal
and compliance management and the external
auditor to consider HSBC Holdings’ financial
reporting, the nature and scope of audit reviews and
the effectiveness of the systems of internal control,
compliance and risk management. The members of
the Group Audit Committee throughout 2007 were,
R A Fairhead (appointed Chairman on 25 May
2007), J D Coombe and J W J Hughes-Hallett.
S W Newton was appointed a member of the
Committee on 25 May 2007. Sir Brian Moffat
ceased to be Chairman and a member of the
Committee on 25 May 2007. R K F Ch’ien retired as
a Director of HSBC Holdings and ceased to be a
member of the Committee on 25 May 2007. All
301
members of the Committee are independent non-
executive Directors.
The Board has determined that R A Fairhead,
J D Coombe, J W J Hughes-Hallett and S W Newton
are independent according to SEC criteria, and that
R A Fairhead, J D Coombe, and J W J Hughes-
Hallett may be regarded as audit committee financial
experts for the purposes of section 407 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and as having recent and
relevant financial experience.
Appointments to the Committee are made for
periods of up to three years, extendable by no more
than two additional three-year periods, so long as
members continue to be independent.
Formal and tailored induction programmes are
held for newly-appointed Committee members and
appropriate training is provided on an ongoing and
timely basis.
There were seven meetings of the Group Audit
Committee during 2007. The table on page 296 gives
details of Directors’ attendance at these meetings.
Following each meeting the Committee reports to
the Board on its activities.
At each meeting, the Committee has the
opportunity to meet with the external auditor,
without management present, to facilitate the
discussion of any matter relating to its remit and any
issue arising from the audit. Similar arrangements
have been adopted for the Committee to meet with
the internal auditor.
The terms of reference of the Committee,
which are reviewed annually, are available at
www.hsbc.com/boardcommittees. To ensure
consistency of scope and approach by subsidiary
company audit committees, the Group Audit
Committee has established core terms of reference to
guide subsidiary company Boards when adopting
terms of reference for their audit committees.
Subsidiary company audit committees are required
to provide bi-annual certificates to the Committee
relating to the financial statements and internal
control procedures of those subsidiaries.
The Group Audit Committee is accountable to
the Board and assists it in meeting its responsibilities
for maintaining an effective system of internal
control and compliance and for meeting its external
financial reporting obligations. The Committee
undertakes an annual review of the effectiveness of
HSBC’s system of internal control, which is
described on page 304, and reviews the Company’s
financial statements before they are considered by
the Board.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Board of Directors > Board committees
Regular reports are received on the risks
involved in HSBC’s business and how they are
controlled and monitored by management which
enable the Committee to review the effectiveness of
HSBC’s risk management framework. Each year the
Committee agrees a schedule of presentations to be
made to it by management during the ensuing year
on the operation of the risk control framework within
the Group. The presentations specifically address
risk indicators and performance measures such as
indicators of credit, liquidity and interest rate risk.
During 2007 the Committee also received frequent
reports on the US mortgage services business, credit
performance in the US and the impact of the
tightening of liquidity in the money markets.
Comprehensive reports are received at each meeting
from the Group Chief Risk Officer, the Head of
Group Compliance, the Group General Manager,
Legal and Compliance and the Group General
Manager Internal Audit. Periodic presentations
are made by other functional heads and line
management.
The reports from the Group General Manager
Internal Audit include information on frauds and
special investigations and weakness in internal
controls identified through internal audit reports or
reviews of regulatory reports and external auditors’
reports. The Committee monitors and reviews the
effectiveness of the internal audit function and
receives summaries of periodic peer reviews of
HSBC’s principal internal audit functions. HSBC
has adopted the Principles of the International
Institute of Internal Auditors, which include a
periodic external quality assurance review of the
internal audit function. The first such review was
undertaken by Independent Audit Limited during
2007.
The Committee receives regular updates on
changes in law, regulations and accounting standards
and practices and the preparations being made to
respond to those requirements. During 2007, the
Committee received regular updates on the review of
internal financial reporting controls required by
section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the
implementation of the Basel II capital adequacy
requirements. The Committee also considered
a report on HSBC’s compliance with the
recommendations of the Institute of International
Finance’s Special Committee on Liquidity Risk.
The Committee has approved procedures for the
receipt, retention and handling of complaints
regarding accounting, internal accounting controls
and auditing matters. The Committee receives
regular reports regarding the nature, investigation
302
and resolution of material complaints and concerns
from the Head of Group Compliance.
The Committee is directly responsible on behalf
of the Board for the selection, oversight and
remuneration of the external auditor. The Committee
reviews and monitors the external auditor’s
independence and objectivity and the effectiveness
of the audit process, taking into consideration
relevant professional and regulatory requirements.
The Committee reviews the strategy and
approves the terms for the engagement of the
external auditor for the audit of the Annual Report
and Accounts. Regular reports on the progress of the
audit facilitate the Committee’s assessment of the
effectiveness of the audit.
The Committee receives reports from the
external auditor on its own policies and procedures
regarding independence and quality control and
oversees the appropriate rotation of audit partners
within the external auditor. The external auditor
provides the Committee with an annual confirmation
of its independence in accordance with industry
standards.
On the recommendation of the Committee the
Board has approved a policy for the employment by
HSBC of former employees of the external auditor
or its affiliates. The Committee monitors this policy
through the receipt of an annual report of those
former employees of the external auditor employed
by HSBC and the number of former employees of
the external auditor currently employed in senior
positions in HSBC. The reports enable the
Committee to consider whether there has been any
impairment, or appearance of impairment, of the
auditor’s judgement or independence in respect of
the audit.
The Group Audit Committee has established
policies for the pre-approval of specific services that
may be provided by the principal auditor, KPMG
Audit Plc and its affiliates (‘KPMG’). These policies
are kept under review and amended as necessary to
meet the dual objectives of ensuring that HSBC
benefits in a cost effective manner from the
cumulative knowledge and experience of its auditor,
while also ensuring that the auditor maintains the
necessary degree of independence and objectivity.
These pre-approval policies apply to all services
where HSBC Holdings or any of its subsidiaries pays
for the service, or is a beneficiary or addressee of the
service and has selected or influenced the choice of
KPMG. All services entered into with KPMG during
2007 were pre-approved by the Committee or were
entered into under pre-approval policies established
by the Committee. A quarterly update on non-audit
services provided by KPMG is presented to the
Committee.
The pre-approved services relate to regulatory
reviews, agreed-upon procedures reports, other types
of attestation reports, the provision of advice and
other non-audit services allowed under SEC
independence rules. They fall into the categories of
audit services, audit-related services, tax services
and other services.
All services provided by KPMG relating to the
implementation of section 404 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act were specifically pre-approved by the
Group Audit Committee.
An analysis of the remuneration paid in respect
of audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG
for each of the last three years is disclosed in Note 9
on the Financial Statements.
The Committee has recommended to the Board
that KPMG Audit Plc be reappointed auditor at the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Remuneration Committee
The role of the Remuneration Committee and its
membership are set out in the Directors’
Remuneration Report on page 322.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee is responsible for
leading the process for Board appointments and for
identifying and nominating, for approval by the
Board, candidates for appointment to the Board.
Before recommending an appointment to the Board,
the Committee evaluates the balance of skills,
knowledge and experience on the Board and, in the
light of this, identifies the role and capabilities
required for a particular appointment. Candidates are
considered on merit against these criteria. Care is
taken to ensure that appointees have enough time to
devote to HSBC. Prospective Directors are asked to
identify any significant other commitments and
confirm they have sufficient time to discharge what
is expected of them. In accordance with the Articles
of Association all Directors are subject to election by
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
following their appointment by the Board and to
re-election at least every three years. The members
of the Nomination Committee throughout 2007 were
Sir Brian Williamson (appointed Chairman on
25 May 2007), Baroness Dunn and Sir Brian Moffat.
J W J Hughes-Hallett and S M Robertson were
appointed members of the Committee on 25 May
2007. Lord Butler ceased to be a member on 25 May
2007.
303
There were two Nomination Committee
meetings during 2007. The table on page 296 gives
details of Directors’ attendance at these meetings.
Following each meeting the Committee reports
to the Board on its activities.
The terms of reference of the Committee are
available at www.hsbc.com/boardcommittees.
The appointments of J F Gil Díaz, J L Durán and
W S H Laidlaw as non-executive Directors and
V H C Cheng as an executive Director were made on
the advice and recommendation of the Nomination
Committee. J F Gil Díaz, former Secretary of
Finance and Public Credit in Mexico, was identified
by the Nomination Committee and so neither an
external consultancy nor open advertising was used
in connection with his appointment. An external
consultancy was used in connection with the
appointments of J L Durán and W S H Laidlaw.
The terms and conditions of appointment of
non-executive Directors are available for inspection
at 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ and will be
made available for 15 minutes before the Annual
General Meeting and during the Meeting itself.
The Committee makes recommendations to the
Board concerning: plans for succession for both
executive and non-executive Directors; the
appointment of any Director to executive or other
office; suitable candidates for the role of senior
independent non-executive Director; the re-election
by shareholders of Directors retiring by rotation; the
renewal of the terms of office of non-executive
Directors; membership of Board Committees, in
consultation with the Group Chairman and the
chairman of such committees as appropriate; any
matters relating to the continuation in office of any
Director at any time; Directors’ fees and committee
fees for the Company; and appointments and re-
appointments to the Boards of Directors of major
subsidiary companies as appropriate.
The Committee regularly reviews the structure,
size and composition (including the skills,
knowledge and experience required) of the Board
and makes recommendations to the Board as
appropriate. It keeps under review the leadership
needs of HSBC, with a view to ensuring the
continued ability of HSBC to compete effectively in
the marketplace. The Board has satisfied itself that
the Nomination Committee has in place appropriate
plans for orderly succession to the Board and senior
management positions as well as procedures to
ensure an appropriate balance of skills and
experience within HSBC and on the Board.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Board of Directors > Board committees / Internal control
Corporate Sustainability Committee
HSBC’s key internal control procedures include
The Corporate Sustainability Committee is
responsible for overseeing corporate responsibility
and sustainability policies, principally
environmental, social and ethical matters and for
advising the Board, committees of the Board and
executive management on such matters. The terms of
reference of the Committee are available at
www.hsbc.com/boardcommittees. The members of
the Committee throughout 2007 were Lord Butler
(Chairman), W K L Fung and Sir Mark Moody-
Stuart (each of whom is a non-executive Director)
and G V I Davis and Lord May, who are non-
director members of the Committee. S Hintze was a
member of the Committee until her retirement as a
Director at the conclusion of the 2007 Annual
General Meeting.
There were five meetings of the Corporate
Sustainability Committee during 2007. Following
each meeting the Committee reports to the Board on
its activities.
Further information will be in HSBC’s
Sustainability Report 2007, available in May 2008.
Internal control
The Directors are responsible for internal control in
HSBC and for reviewing its effectiveness.
Procedures have been designed for safeguarding
assets against unauthorised use or disposition; for
maintaining proper accounting records; and for the
reliability of financial information used within the
business or for publication. Such procedures are
designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of
failure to achieve business objectives and can only
provide reasonable and not absolute assurance
against material misstatement, errors, losses or fraud.
The procedures also enable HSBC Holdings to
discharge its obligations under the Handbook of
Rules and Guidance issued by the Financial Services
Authority, HSBC’s lead regulator.
The key procedures that the Directors have
established are designed to provide effective internal
control within HSBC and accord with the Internal
Control: Revised Guidance for Directors on the
Combined Code issued by the Financial Reporting
Council. Such procedures for the ongoing
identification, evaluation and management of the
significant risks faced by HSBC have been in place
throughout the year and up to 3 March 2008, the date
of approval of the Annual Report and Accounts
2007. In the case of companies acquired during the
year, the internal controls in place are being
reviewed against HSBC’s benchmarks and integrated
into HSBC’s processes.
304
the following:
• Authority to operate the various subsidiaries and
responsibilities for financial performance
against plans and for capital expenditure is
delegated to their respective chief executive
officers within limits set by the Board of
Directors of HSBC Holdings. Sub-delegation of
authority from the Board to individuals requires
these individuals, within their respective
delegation, to maintain a clear and appropriate
apportionment of significant responsibilities and
to oversee the establishment and maintenance of
systems of controls appropriate to the business.
The appointment of executives to the most
senior positions within HSBC requires the
approval of the Board of Directors of HSBC
Holdings.
• Functional, operating, financial reporting and
certain management reporting standards are
established by Group Head Office management
committees, for application across the whole of
HSBC. These are supplemented by operating
standards set by functional and local
management as required for the type of business
and geographical location of each subsidiary.
• Systems and procedures are in place in HSBC to
identify, control and report on the major risks
including credit, changes in the market prices of
financial instruments, liquidity, operational
error, breaches of law or regulations,
unauthorised activities and fraud. Exposure to
these risks is monitored by risk management
committees, asset and liability committees and
executive committees in subsidiaries and by the
Group Management Board for HSBC as a
whole. A risk management meeting of the Group
Management Board, chaired by the Group
Finance Director, is held monthly. These risk
management meetings address asset, liability
and management issues. Minutes of the risk
management meetings of the Group
Management Board are submitted to the
Group Audit Committee and to the Board of
Directors.
• A Disclosure Committee has been established to
review material disclosures made by HSBC
Holdings for any errors, misstatements or
omissions. The membership of the Disclosure
Committee, which is chaired by the Group
Company Secretary, includes the heads of the
Finance, Legal, Risk, Compliance, Corporate
Communications, Investor Relations and
Internal Audit functions and representatives
from the principal regions, customer groups
and global businesses.
• Processes are in place to identify new risks from
changes in market practices or customer
behaviours which could expose HSBC to
heightened risk of loss or reputational damage.
During 2007 attention continued to be directed
towards evolving best practice in the areas of
internet banking; counterparty risk management
policy following the publication of the Corrigan
report in July 2005; best practice guidance
emerging on liquidity management from the
Institute of International Finance; the
implications of a slowing housing market in the
US coupled with rising payment obligations
under ARMs; Group exposure to monolines and
money market funds; the impact on the Group
of the market illiquidity situation; and the
implications of changed customer behaviour in
the UK regarding seeking protection from credit
obligations.
• Periodic strategic plans are prepared for key
customer groups, global product groups, support
functions and certain geographies within the
framework of the Group Strategic Roadmap.
Rolling operating plans are prepared and
adopted by all major HSBC operating
companies, and set out the key business
initiatives and the likely financial effects of
those initiatives.
• Centralised functional control is exercised over
all computer system developments and
operations. Common systems are employed for
similar business processes wherever practicable.
Credit and market risks are measured and
reported on in subsidiaries and aggregated for
review of risk concentrations on a Group-wide
basis.
• Authorities to enter into credit exposures and
market risk exposures are delegated with limits
to line management in the subsidiaries. In
addition, functional management in Group Head
Office is responsible for setting policies,
procedures and standards in the following areas
of risk: credit risk; market risk; liquidity risk;
operational risk; IT risk; insurance risk;
accounting risk; tax risk; legal and regulatory
compliance risk; human resources risk;
reputational risk; and purchasing risk.
• Policies to guide subsidiary companies and
management at all levels in the conduct of
business to safeguard the Group’s reputation are
established by the Board of HSBC Holdings and
the Group Management Board, subsidiary
305
company Boards, Board committees or senior
management. Reputational risks can arise from
environmental, social or governance issues, or
as a consequence of operational risk events. As a
banking group, HSBC’s good reputation
depends upon the way in which it conducts its
business but it can also be affected by the way in
which clients, to which it provides financial
services, conduct their business.
• The internal audit function, which is centrally
controlled, monitors the effectiveness of internal
control structures across the whole of HSBC.
The work of the internal audit function is
focused on areas of greatest risk to HSBC as
determined by a risk-based approach. The head
of this function reports to the Group Chairman
and the Group Audit Committee.
• Management is responsible for ensuring that
recommendations made by the internal audit
function are implemented within an appropriate
and agreed timetable. Confirmation to this effect
must be provided to internal audit. Management
must also confirm annually to internal audit that
offices under their control have taken or are in
the process of taking the appropriate actions to
deal with all significant recommendations made
by external auditors in management letters or by
regulators following regulatory inspections.
The Group Audit Committee has kept under
review the effectiveness of this system of internal
control and has reported regularly to the Board of
Directors. The key processes used by the Committee
in carrying out its reviews include: regular business
and operational risk assessments; regular reports
from the heads of key risk functions including
Internal Audit and Compliance; the production
annually of reviews of the internal control
framework applied at Group Head Office and major
operating subsidiary level measured against HSBC
benchmarks, which cover all internal controls, both
financial and non-financial; semi-annual
confirmations from chief executives of principal
subsidiary companies as to whether there have been
any material losses, contingencies or uncertainties
caused by weaknesses in internal controls; internal
audit reports; external audit reports; prudential
reviews; and regulatory reports. In addition, where
unexpected losses have arisen or where incidents
have occurred which indicate gaps in the control
framework or in adherence to Group policies, the
Group Audit Committee has reviewed special
reports, prepared at the instigation of management,
which analyse the cause of the issue, the lessons
learned and the actions proposed by management to
address the issue.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Board of Directors > Directors’ interests / Employees
The Directors, through the Group Audit
Committee, have conducted an annual review of the
effectiveness of HSBC’s system of internal control
covering all material controls, including financial,
operational and compliance controls and risk
management systems. The Group Audit Committee
has received confirmation that management has
taken or is taking the necessary action to remedy any
failings or weaknesses identified through the
operation of HSBC’s framework of controls.
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Directors’ interests
Pursuant to the requirements of the UK Listing Rules
and according to the register maintained by HSBC
Holdings pursuant to section 352 of the Securities
and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong, the Directors
of HSBC Holdings at the year-end had the following
interests, all beneficial unless otherwise stated, in the
shares and loan capital of HSBC and its associated
corporations:
J D Coombe .......................
Baroness Dunn ...................
D J Flint .............................
W K L Fung .......................
M F Geoghegan .................
S K Green ...........................
J W J Hughes-Hallett .........
Sir Brian Moffat .................
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart .....
G Morgan ...........................
S W Newton .......................
S M Robertson ...................
Sir Brian Williamson .........
At
1 January
2007
39,799
176,525
104,947
328,000
113,525
401,796
1,668,986
12,149
10,840
–
5,631
131,976
17,281
Beneficial
owner
Child
under 18
or spouse
12,528
155,014
83,467
328,000
385,189
491,297
–
–
5,000
50,000
5,903
5,317
23,164
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
840
–
–
–
–
At 31 December 2007
Jointly
with
another
person
–
–
–
–
–
45,355
–
17,783
–
–
–
–
–
Controlled
corporation
Total
interests1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
50,949
–
–
46,327
183,664
112,781
328,000
385,189
536,652
554,435
17,783
10,840
50,000
56,852
98,317
23,164
Trustee
33,7992
28,6502
29,3143
–
–
–
554,4352
–
5,0002
–
–
93,0002
–
1 Each of the total interests represents less than 0.02 per cent of the shares in issue. Details of executive Directors’ other interests in
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50 arising from employee share plans are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on
pages 330 to 332. At 31 December 2007, the aggregate interests under the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong of D J Flint,
M F Geoghegan and S K Green in HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50, including interests arising through employee share
plans are: D J Flint – 877,404; M F Geoghegan – 1,509,480; and S K Green – 1,710,886.
2 Non-beneficial.
3 Non-beneficial interest in 9,772 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50.
M F Geoghegan has an interest as beneficial
owner in 280,000 ordinary shares of HK$5.00 each
in Hang Seng Bank (representing less than 0.02 per
cent of the shares in issue), which he acquired during
the year.
S K Green has an interest as beneficial owner in
€75,000 of HSBC Holdings plc 5½ per cent
Subordinated Notes 2009 which he held throughout
the year.
As a Director of HSBC Private Banking
Holdings (Suisse), S K Green has an interest as
beneficial owner in one share of CHF1,000 in that
company (representing less than 0.01 per cent of the
shares in issue), which he held throughout the year.
S K Green has waived his rights to receive dividends
on the share and has undertaken to transfer the share
to HSBC on ceasing to be a Director of HSBC
Private Banking Holdings (Suisse).
As Directors of HSBC France, S K Green and
M F Geoghegan each have an interest as beneficial
owner in one share of €5 in that company
(representing less than 0.01 per cent of the shares in
issue), which they held throughout the year. The
Directors have waived their rights to receive
dividends on these shares and have undertaken to
transfer these shares to HSBC on ceasing to be
Directors of HSBC France.
No Directors held any short positions as defined
in the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong
Kong in the shares and loan capital of HSBC and its
associated corporations. Save as stated above and in
the Directors’ Remuneration Report, none of the
Directors had an interest in any shares or debentures
of HSBC or any associated corporation at the
beginning or at the end of the year, and none of the
Directors or members of their immediate family was
306
awarded or exercised any right to subscribe for any
shares or debentures in any HSBC corporation
during the year.
Since the end of the year, the interests of each of
the following Directors have increased by the
number of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares shown
against their name:
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
J D Coombe .........................................................................
Baroness Dunn .....................................................................
D J Flint ...............................................................................
M F Geoghegan ...................................................................
S K Green ............................................................................
Sir Brian Moffat ...................................................................
G Morgan .............................................................................
S W Newton .........................................................................
S M Robertson .....................................................................
Sir Brian Williamson ...........................................................
Beneficial
owner
1271
5061
8822
2,2861
4,8254
1791
5051
601
531
2341
Jointly with
another person
Beneficiary
of a trust
Controlled
corporation
–
–
2961
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,7053
11,3613
11,8363
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5151
–
–
1 Scrip dividend.
2 Comprises scrip dividend on shares held as beneficial owner (779 shares), the acquisition of shares in the HSBC Holdings UK Share
Ownership Plan through regular monthly contributions (33 shares), the automatic reinvestment of dividend income on shares held in the
plan (14 shares) and by the automatic reinvestment of dividend income by an Individual Savings Account and Personal Equity Plan
manager (56 shares).
3 Scrip dividend on conditional awards held under The HSBC Share Plan and the HSBC Holdings Restricted Share Plan 2000.
4 Comprises scrip dividend on shares held as beneficial owner (4,778 shares), the acquisition of shares in the HSBC Holdings UK Share
Ownership Plan through regular monthly contributions (33 shares) and the automatic reinvestment of dividend income on shares held in
the plan (14 shares).
W S H Laidlaw had beneficial and non-
beneficial interests in 20,000 and 4,500 HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares respectively, on 1 January
2008, the date he was appointed a Director of HSBC
Holdings.
V H C Cheng had beneficial interests in 244,539
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares and 408,022
conditional long-term incentive awards of
Performance Shares on 1 February 2008, the date he
was appointed a Director of HSBC Holdings.
There have been no other changes in the share
and loan capital interests of the Directors until the
date of this Report. Any subsequent changes up to
the last practicable date before the publication of the
Notice of Annual General Meeting will be set out in
the notes to that Notice.
At 31 December 2007, Directors and Senior
Management held, in aggregate, beneficial interests
in 12,849,034 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares
(0.1 per cent of the issued ordinary shares).
At 31 December 2007, executive Directors and
Senior Management held, in aggregate, options to
subscribe for 58,795 HSBC Holdings ordinary
shares under the HSBC Holdings Executive Share
Option Scheme and HSBC Holdings savings-related
share option plans. These options are exercisable
between 2008 and 2013 at prices ranging from
£5.3496 to £7.6736 per share.
Employees
At 31 December 2007, HSBC’s customers were
served by 330,000 full and part-time employees
worldwide, compared with 312,000 at 31 December
2006 and 284,000 at 31 December 2005. The main
centres of employment are the UK with
approximately 56,700 employees; the US 43,000;
India 33,000; Hong Kong 29,000; Brazil 27,000;
Mexico 23,000 and France 15,000. HSBC negotiates
with recognised unions. The highest concentrations
of union membership are in Argentina, Brazil,
Colombia, Egypt, France, Germany, Jordan,
Lebanon, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, the Philippines,
Singapore and the UK. It is HSBC’s policy to
maintain well-developed communications and
consultation programmes and there have been no
material disruptions to its operations from labour
disputes during the past five years.
HSBC continues to develop the capabilities of
its people. Formal policies and structures are in place
to provide career development and training for all
employees, with particular emphasis on increasing
international mobility to enrich the diversity of the
employees’ experience. HSBC’s talent strategy,
which focuses on the development of leadership
capability and smooth succession planning,
continues. This is being achieved through mutual
and open dialogue and planned development from
graduate through to senior management levels.
307
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Employees > Involvement / Disabled persons / Remuneration policy / Share plans
HSBC continues to be committed to creating a
diverse and inclusive work environment reflective of
its customer base, international workforce, and
communities in which it operates. It has a Group-
wide strategy that aims to improve gender, ethnicity
and age diversity to ensure the long-term
sustainability of the organisation. There is particular
focus on increasing gender and ethnic diversity at
senior management levels. Diversity initiatives are
implemented at a country level taking local and
national laws into account. Employee network
groups and mentoring programmes are promoted and
established where possible to facilitate open
discussion of workplace issues for employees
belonging to minority groups, and to foster an
environment that celebrates diversity.
HSBC recognises its role as an employer in a
wider context and is committed to employee health
issues, promoting employee involvement in
community and not-for-profit organisations and
providing flexible working opportunities. As a
responsible employer and corporate citizen, HSBC
recognises the need to address the issues raised by
HIV/AIDS in the workplace and, in 2007, launched a
HIV/AIDS policy. The policy defines the approach
and minimum standards to be achieved by HSBC
entities around the world. Key principles include
non-discrimination and confidentiality, voluntary
testing, commitment to prevention, education,
awareness, care and support. To coincide with the
launch of the Group policy an e-learning module and
a dedicated intranet site was established to provide
education on the important issues surrounding
HIV/AIDS.
HSBC considers its people to be fundamental to
its past and future success. In its pursuit of making
HSBC the best place to work, HSBC maintains an
ongoing dialogue with employees, and looks to
understand how they are motivated and engaged. In
2007, HSBC conducted its first Global People
Survey which comprised questions designed to
measure employee engagement levels consistently
across the Group. The survey covered HSBC’s
permanent global workforce, and responses were
received from almost 290,000 employees, a
significant response rate of 88 per cent. Questions
were summarised under 12 dimensions. On all of the
dimensions, employees rated HSBC above external
global norms. Particular areas of strength were
HSBC’s brand reputation, its commitment to
corporate sustainability and the quality of its direct
managers. HSBC has communicated the results and
key action plans are being developed to improve
engagement. Following the success of the first
308
survey, plans are underway for the second survey
in 2008.
Employee involvement
HSBC values open communication with its
employees. Employees are encouraged to discuss
operational and strategic issues, and ways of
improving performance, with their line managers.
Open communication throughout the organisation is
encouraged and opportunities to share individual
perspectives are created through networking events,
management blogs, international assignments and
learning and development programmes. Information
is regularly given to employees about employment
matters and the financial and economic factors
affecting HSBC’s performance. This is
communicated via management channels, internal
seminars, training programmes, in-house magazines
and an intranet site accessible to the majority of
HSBC’s employees worldwide.
Employment of disabled persons
HSBC believes in providing equal opportunities to
all employees. The employment of disabled persons
is included in this commitment and the recruitment,
training, career development and promotion of
disabled persons is based on the aptitudes and
abilities of the individual. Should employees become
disabled during employment, every effort is made to
continue their employment and, if necessary,
appropriate training is provided.
Remuneration policy
As the quality and commitment of its human capital
is deemed fundamental to HSBC’s success, the
Board’s stated strategy is to attract, retain and
motivate the very best people.
In a business that is based on trust and
relationships, HSBC’s broad policy is to recruit those
who are committed to making a long-term career
with the organisation since trust and relationships are
built over time.
Remuneration is an important component in
people’s decisions on which company to join and to
stay with, but it is not the overriding one; it is
HSBC’s experience that people are attracted to,
an organisation with strong values, one which is
meritocratic and competitive and which offers
transparent and interesting career development.
In line with the overall principles applied by the
Remuneration Committee as described on page 322
in the Directors’ Remuneration Report:
•
employees’ salaries are reviewed annually in the
•
context of individual and business performance,
market practice, internal relativities and
competitive market pressures. Allowances and
benefits are largely determined by local market
practice;
employees participate in various variable pay
arrangements. Discretionary variable pay plans
will normally make reference to the
achievement of objectives which are ultimately
aligned to those at the Group level, and which
typically cover financial, customer, process and
people targets. These targets typically include
revenue growth, expense control, customer
recommendation, employee engagement,
adherence to HSBC’s ethical standards, lending
guidelines, internal controls and procedures to
maintain a strong and secure operating platform.
Actual levels of pay will depend on the
performance of constituent businesses, the
individuals concerned and competitive market
practice; and
• HSBC has a long history of paying close
attention to its customers in order to provide
value for both customers and shareholders. This
has been achieved by ensuring that the interests
of HSBC and its employees are aligned with
those of its shareholders and that HSBC’s
approach to risk management serves the
interests of all. Accordingly, employees are
encouraged to participate in the success they
help to create, through the HSBC Holdings
savings-related share option plans and local
share ownership and profit sharing
arrangements.
Employee share plans
To help align the interests of employees with those
of shareholders, share options are granted under all-
employee share plans and discretionary awards of
Performance Shares and Restricted Shares are made
under The HSBC Share Plan. There have been no
awards of discretionary share options since
30 September 2005.
Set out on pages 309 to 317 are particulars of
outstanding employee share options, including those
held by employees working under employment
contracts that are regarded as ‘continuous contracts’
for the purposes of the Hong Kong Employment
Ordinance. The options were granted at nil
consideration. No options have been granted to
substantial shareholders, suppliers of goods or
services, or in excess of the individual limit for each
share plan. No options were cancelled during the
year.
309
Employee share plans are subject to the
following limits on the number of HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares that may be subscribed for. In any
10-year period not more than 10 per cent of the
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in issue from time
to time (approximately 1,187 million HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares at 3 March 2008) may in
aggregate become issuable pursuant to the grant of
options or be issued other than pursuant to options
under all-employee share plans. In any 10-year
period not more than 5 per cent of the HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares in issue from time to time
(approximately 593 million HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares on 3 March 2008) may in aggregate
be put under option under The HSBC Share Plan or
be issuable pursuant to the HSBC Holdings Group
Share Option Plan, the HSBC Executive Share
Option Scheme, the HSBC Holdings Restricted
Share Plan 2000 or The HSBC Share Plan. The
number of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares that may
be issued on exercise of all options granted on or
after 27 May 2005 under The HSBC Share Plan and
any other plans must not exceed 1,119,000,000
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares. Under the HSBC
Holdings savings-related share option plans, The
HSBC Share Plan, HSBC Holdings Group Share
Option Plan and the HSBC Holdings Executive
Share Option Scheme there were options outstanding
over 260,714,579 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares at
31 December 2007. Particulars of options over
HSBC Holdings shares held by Directors of HSBC
Holdings are set out on page 331 of the Directors’
Remuneration Report.
The effect on earnings per share of granting
share options and share awards is shown in diluted
earnings per share on the face of the consolidated
income statement, with further details disclosed in
Note 13 on the Financial Statements. The effect on
basic earnings per share of dilutive share options and
share awards would be to dilute it by 1.2 per cent.
All-employee share option plans
The HSBC Holdings Savings-Related Share Option
Plan and the HSBC Holdings Savings-Related Share
Option Plan: International are all-employee share
plans under which eligible HSBC employees (those
employed within the Group on the first working day
of the year of grant) may be granted options to
acquire HSBC Holdings ordinary shares. Employees
may make contributions of up to £250 (or
equivalent) each month over a period of one, three or
five years which may be used on the first, third or
fifth anniversary of the commencement of the
relevant savings contract, at the employee’s election,
to exercise the options. Alternatively, the employee
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Employees > Share plans
may elect to have the savings, plus (where
applicable) any interest or bonus, repaid in cash.
Options granted over a one-year period will be
exercisable within three months following the first
anniversary of the commencement of the savings
contract. Options granted over three or five-year
periods will be exercisable within six months
following the third or fifth anniversary of the
commencement of the relevant savings contract. In
the case of redundancy, retirement on grounds of
injury or ill health, retirement at or after normal
retirement age, the transfer of the employing
business to another party, or a change of control of
the employing company, options may be exercised
before completion of the relevant savings contract.
Under the HSBC Holdings Savings-Related
Share Option Plan and the HSBC Holdings Savings-
Related Share Option Plan: International the option
exercise price is determined by reference to the
average market value of the ordinary shares on the
HSBC Holdings Savings-Related Share Option Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
five business days immediately preceding the
invitation date, then applying a discount of
20 per cent (except for the one-year options awarded
under the US sub-plan where a 15 per cent discount
is applied). The exercise period of the options
awarded under all-employee share plans may be
advanced to an earlier date in certain circumstances,
for example on retirement, and may be extended in
certain circumstances, for example on the death of a
participant, the executors may exercise the option up
to six months beyond the normal exercise period.
The closing price per HSBC Holdings ordinary share
on 24 April 2007, the day before options were
awarded in 2007 under the HSBC Holdings
Savings-Related Share Option Plan and the HSBC
Holdings Savings-Related Share Option Plan:
International, was £9.21. The all-employee share
option plans will terminate on 27 May 2015 unless
the Directors resolve to terminate the plans at an
earlier date.
Date of
award
Exercise
price (£)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
Options
awarded
during year
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
11 Apr 2001
2 May 2002
23 Apr 2003
23 Apr 2003
21 Apr 2004
21 Apr 2004
24 May 2005
24 May 2005
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
6.7536 1 Aug 2006 31 Jan 2007
6.3224 1 Aug 2007 31 Jan 2008
5.3496 1 Aug 2006 31 Jan 2007
5.3496 1 Aug 2008 31 Jan 2009
6.4720 1 Aug 2007 31 Jan 2008
6.4720 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
6.6792 1 Aug 2008 31 Jan 2009
6.6792 1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
7.6736 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
7.6736 1 Aug 2011 31 Jan 2012
7.0872 1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
7.0872 1 Aug 2012 31 Jan 2013
59,421
3,552,436
177,912
11,001,155
3,110,196
5,295,786
3,959,600
5,329,930
4,653,146
3,550,685
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,166,897
4,228,735
45,047
3,404,960
131,858
164,054
2,862,811
46,221
50,595
25,815
20,423
3,747
407
206
14,374
60,713
46,054
434,148
114,418
308,473
386,135
365,684
815,325
484,766
399,118
153,058
–
86,763
–
10,402,953
132,967
4,941,092
3,522,870
4,938,431
3,817,398
3,062,172
5,767,372
4,075,471
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.12.
HSBC Holdings Savings-Related Share Option
Plan: International
To encourage greater participation in the HSBC
Holdings Savings-Related Share Option Plan:
International, two amendments were approved at the
2005 Annual General Meeting. The first was the
introduction of the facility to save and have option
prices expressed in US dollars, Hong Kong dollars
and euros as well as in pounds sterling. Where
applicable, the US dollars, Hong Kong dollars and
euro exercise prices are converted from the sterling
exercise price at the applicable exchange rate on the
working day preceding the relevant invitation date.
The second amendment was to provide the choice of
options over one year in addition to three and five
year terms.
310
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
Exercise
price
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
Options
awarded
during year
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
11 Apr 2001
2 May 2002
23 Apr 2003
8 May 2003
8 May 2003
21 Apr 2004
21 Apr 2004
10 May 2004
10 May 2004
24 May 2005
24 May 2005
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
(£)
6.7536 1 Aug 2006 31 Jan 2007
6.3224 1 Aug 2007 31 Jan 2008
5.3496 1 Aug 2008 31 Jan 2009
5.3496 1 Aug 2006 31 Jan 2007
5.3496 1 Aug 2008 31 Jan 2009
6.4720 1 Aug 2007 31 Jan 2008
6.4720 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
6.4720 1 Aug 2007 31 Jan 2008
6.4720 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
6.6792 1 Aug 2008 31 Jan 2009
6.6792 1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
7.6736 1 Aug 2007 31 Oct 2007
7.6736 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
7.6736 1 Aug 2011 31 Jan 2012
7.0872 1 Aug 2008 31 Oct 2008
7.0872 1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
7.0872 1 Aug 2012 31 Jan 2013
(US$)
14.16212
1 Aug 2007 31 Oct 2007
13.3290 1 Aug 2007 31 Oct 2007
13.3290 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
13.3290 1 Aug 2011 31 Jan 2012
14.74782 1 Aug 2008 31 Oct 2008
13.8803 1 Aug 2008 31 Oct 2008
13.8803 1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
13.8803 1 Aug 2012 31 Jan 2013
(€)
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
11.0062 1 Aug 2007 31 Oct 2007
11.0062 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
11.0062 1 Aug 2011 31 Jan 2012
10.4217 1 Aug 2008 31 Oct 2008
10.4217 1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
10.4217 1 Aug 2012 31 Jan 2013
40,853
1,063,521
10,488
310,378
5,827,034
47,070
12,365
8,613,295
2,953,476
10,956,064
3,743,916
860,609
2,324,779
518,112
–
–
–
591,818
112,660
1,749,146
478,476
–
–
–
–
42,046
188,857
39,570
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,647,064
3,573,175
1,019,913
–
–
–
–
729,015
347,176
2,817,545
804,104
–
–
–
128,427
376,440
128,871
11,473
832,209
–
120,785
77,890
15,770
–
7,394,632
30,234
141,018
19,417
727,512
8,155
367
26
287
–
493,725
92,917
7,220
1,412
–
–
232
362
38,928
–
–
–
–
–
(HK$)
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
26 Apr 2006
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
25 Apr 2007
103.4401 1 Aug 2007 31 Oct 2007
103.4401 1 Aug 2009 31 Jan 2010
103.4401 1 Aug 2011 31 Jan 2012
1 Aug 2008 31 Oct 2008
108.4483
1 Aug 2010 31 Jan 2011
108.4483
1 Aug 2012 31 Jan 2013
108.4483
1,295,846
4,255,761
1,110,391
–
–
–
–
–
–
2,225,766
4,561,313
1,350,798
1,160,815
16,734
1,516
367
826
317
29,380
192,140
–
189,593
680,642
155
–
968,135
369,055
1,379,824
320,921
101,439
512,297
111,002
103,072
136,795
44,150
98,093
14,470
266,055
91,099
57,566
9,396
129,390
43,083
2,271
12,057
4,075
5,795
14,598
3,015
133,070
347,873
84,033
117,273
79,232
18,407
–
39,172
10,488
–
5,068,502
31,145
12,365
250,528
2,554,187
9,435,222
3,403,578
31,658
1,804,327
406,743
1,543,966
3,436,093
975,763
–
5,273
1,475,871
385,965
671,449
337,780
2,687,923
760,659
847
176,800
35,495
122,632
361,842
125,856
1,961
3,891,154
1,024,842
2,108,126
4,481,255
1,332,074
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.13.
2 Exercisable at a 15 per cent discount to the average market value of the ordinary shares on the five business days immediately
preceding the invitation date.
311
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Employees > Share plans / Subsidiary company share plans
Discretionary Share Plans
Note 10 on the Financial Statements gives detail on
share-based payments, including awards of
Performance Shares and Restricted Shares made in
2007.
The HSBC Share Plan was approved at the 2005
Annual General Meeting. Awards of Performance
Shares are made under this Plan to executive
Directors and other senior executives. The
performance conditions for awards of Performance
Shares are described under ‘Long-term incentive
plan’ on page 324.
Awards of Performance Shares are directed to
those senior executives who can influence corporate
performance such as members of the Group
Management Board.
Awards of Restricted Shares are typically made
to other employees based on individual performance,
business performance and competitive market
practice.
Restricted Share awards define the number of
shares to which the employee will become entitled,
generally between one and three years from the date
of the award, subject to the individual remaining in
employment. All awards of Performance Shares and
Restricted Shares will be satisfied by the transfer of
existing shares.
Since 2005, awards of share options under The
HSBC Share Plan have only been granted in very
limited circumstances. There may be particular
circumstances in the future where option grants
could be appropriate. No options were awarded
under The HSBC Share Plan in 2007.
Prior to 2005, discretionary awards of share
options, with vesting subject to the attainment of a
predetermined TSR performance condition, were
made to employees at all levels of HSBC.
The vesting of these options was subject to the
attainment of pre-determined relative TSR
performance criteria, except in HSBC France (which
was acquired in 2000) where performance criteria
were phased in. Under the HSBC Holdings Group
Share Option Plan, the maximum grant of options
which could be granted to an employee in any one
year (together with the Performance Share awards
under the HSBC Holdings Restricted Share Plan
2000) was 150 per cent (or in exceptional
circumstances 225 per cent) of the employee’s
annual salary at the date of grant plus any bonus paid
in the previous year.
Under the HSBC Executive Share Option
scheme the maximum value of options which could
be granted to an employee in any one year was four
times the employee’s relevant earnings. Subject to
the attainment of the relative TSR performance
condition where applicable, options are generally
exercisable between the third and the tenth
anniversary of the date of grant. Employees of a
subsidiary that is sold or transferred out of HSBC
may exercise options awarded under the HSBC
Group Share Option Plan or the HSBC Holdings
Executive Share Option Scheme within six or twelve
months respectively of the sale or transfer, regardless
of whether the performance condition is met.
The maximum value of options that may be
granted to an employee in any one year under
The HSBC Plan (when taken together with any
Performance Share award made under The HSBC
Share Plan) is 700 per cent of the employee’s annual
salary at the date of grant.
The exercise price of options granted under The
HSBC Share Plan, and previously under the HSBC
Holdings Group Share Option Plan, is the higher of
the average market value of the ordinary shares on
the five business days prior to the grant of the option
or the market value of the ordinary shares on the date
of grant of the option. The exercise price of options
granted under the HSBC Holdings Executive Share
Option Scheme was the market value of the ordinary
shares on the business day prior to the grant of the
option. The HSBC Share Plan will terminate on
27 May 2015 unless the Directors resolve to
terminate the Plan at an earlier date.
The exercise period of the options awarded
under discretionary share incentive plans may be
advanced to an earlier date in certain circumstances,
for example on retirement, or on the death of a
participant, options may be exercised up to
12 months beyond the normal exercise period.
312
HSBC Holdings Executive Share Option Scheme1
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
24 Mar 1997
12 Aug 1997
16 Mar 1998
29 Mar 1999
10 Aug 1999
31 Aug 1999
3 Apr 2000
Exercise
price (£)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
5.0160 24 Mar 2000 24 Mar 2007
7.7984 12 Aug 2000 12 Aug 2007
6.2767 16 Mar 2001 16 Mar 2008
6.3754
3 Apr 2002 29 Mar 2009
7.4210 10 Aug 2002 10 Aug 2009
7.8710 31 Aug 2002 31 Aug 2009
3 Apr 2010
7.4600
3 Apr 2003
Options at
1 January
2007
188,074
9,000
678,434
11,808,970
100,058
4,000
9,248,569
Options
exercised
during
year2
188,053
–
243,293
1,829,283
9,000
–
1,108,267
Options
lapsed
during
year
21
9,000
7,500
184,774
–
–
219,372
Options at
31 December
2007
–
–
427,641
9,794,913
91,058
4,000
7,920,930
1 The HSBC Holdings Executive Share Option Scheme expired on 26 May 2000. No options have been granted under the Scheme since
that date.
2 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.15.
HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan1
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
4 Oct 2000
23 Apr 2001
30 Aug 2001
7 May 2002
30 Aug 2002
2 May 2003
29 Aug 2003
3 Nov 2003
30 Apr 2004
27 Aug 2004
20 Apr 2005
Exercise
price (£)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
9.6420
8.7120
8.2280
8.4050
7.4550
6.9100
8.1300
9.1350
8.2830
8.6500
8.3620
4 Oct 2003
4 Oct 2010
23 Apr 2004 23 Apr 2011
30 Aug 2004 30 Aug 2011
7 May 2005 7 May 2012
30 Aug 2005 30 Aug 2012
2 May 2006 2 May 2013
29 Aug 2006 29 Aug 2013
3 Nov 2006
3 Nov 2013
30 Apr 2007
30 Apr 2014
27 Aug 2007
27 Aug 2014
30 Apr 2008
20 Apr 2015
Options at
1 January
2007
321,176
29,400,469
179,193
32,501,697
361,600
34,541,586
445,894
4,885,800
58,455,504
332,470
7,360,795
Options
exercised
during
year2
–
1,450,759
22,175
2,176,110
2,500
4,584,914
30,250
–
84,941
–
–
Options
lapsed
during
year
Options at
31 December
2007
14,535
783,613
6,538
762,898
4,500
999,377
20,860
816,000
4,527,677
20,470
265,500
306,641
27,166,097
150,480
29,562,689
354,600
28,957,295
394,784
4,069,800
53,842,886
312,000
7,095,295
1 The HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan expired on 26 May 2005. No options have been granted under the Plan since that date.
2 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.23.
The HSBC Share Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
21 Jun 2005
30 Sep 2005
Exercise
price (£)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
8.794 21 Jun 2008 21 Jun 2009
9.170 30 Sep 2008 30 Sep 2015
552,526
74,985
Options
exercised
during
year
–
–
Options
lapsed
during
year
103,071
–
Options at
31 December
2007
449,455
74,985
Subsidiary company share plans
HSBC France and subsidiary company
When it was acquired in 2000, HSBC France and
one of its subsidiary companies, HSBC Private Bank
France, operated employee share option plans under
which options could be granted over their respective
shares. No further options will be granted under
either of these companies’ plans. The following are
details of options to acquire shares in HSBC France
and HSBC Private Bank France.
313
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Employees > Subsidiary company share plans
HSBC France
shares of €5
Date of
award
7 May 1997
29 Apr 1998
7 Apr 1999
12 Apr 2000
Exercise
price (€)
Exercisable
Exercisable
Options at
1 January
from
until
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
20071
37.05
73.48
81.71
142.50
7 Jun 2000 7 May 2007
7 Jun 2000 29 Apr 2008
7 Jun 2000
7 Apr 2009
1 Jan 2002 12 Apr 2010
66,000
192,154
383,602
646,125
66,000
91,775
79,200
43,875
–
–
–
–
–
100,379
304,402
602,250
1 Following exercise of the options, the HSBC France shares will be exchanged for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in the same ratio as
for the acquisition of HSBC France (13 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares for each HSBC France share). At 31 December 2007, The
HSBC Holdings Employee Benefit Trust 2001 (No. 1) held 11,665,278 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares which may be exchanged for
HSBC France shares arising from the exercise of these options.
HSBC Private Bank France
shares of €2
Date of
award
21 Dec 1999
9 Mar 2000
15 May 2001
1 Oct 2002
Exercise
price (€)
Exercisable
Exercisable
Options at
1 January
from
until
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
20071
10.84 21 Dec 2000 21 Dec 2009
12.44 27 Jun 2004 31 Dec 2010
20.80 15 May 2002 15 May 2011
1 Oct 2012
2 Oct 2005
22.22
57,130
27,626
155,025
163,075
23,880
7,000
13,500
17,500
–
–
–
–
33,250
20,626
141,525
145,575
1 Following exercise of the options, the HSBC Private Bank France shares will be exchanged for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in the
ratio of 1.83 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares for each HSBC Private Bank France share. At 31 December 2007, The CCF Employee
Benefit Trust 2001 held 955,952 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares which may be exchanged for HSBC Private Bank France shares
arising from the exercise of these options.
HSBC Finance and its subsidiaries
Following the acquisition of HSBC Finance in 2003,
all outstanding options and equity-based awards over
HSBC Finance common shares were converted into
rights to receive HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in
the same ratio as the share exchange offer for the
acquisition of HSBC Finance (2.675 HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares for each HSBC Finance
common share) and the exercise prices per share
were adjusted accordingly. No further options will
be granted under any of these plans.
All outstanding options and other equity-based
awards over HSBC Finance common shares granted
before 14 November 2002, being the date the
transaction was announced, vested on completion of
the acquisition. Options and equity-based awards
granted on or after 14 November 2002 are
exercisable on their original terms, save that they
have been adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio.
The following are details of options and equity-
based awards to acquire shares in HSBC Holdings.
At 31 December 2007, the HSBC (Household)
Employee Benefit Trust 2003 held 1,856,417 HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares and 196,455 American
Depositary Shares, each of which represents five
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares, which may be used
to satisfy the exercise of employee share options.
314
HSBC Finance: 1996 Long-Term Executive Incentive Compensation Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
14 May 1997
10 Nov 1997
15 Jun 1998
1 Jul 1998
9 Nov 1998
17 May 1999
31 Aug 1999
8 Nov 1999
30 Jun 2000
8 Feb 2000
13 Nov 2000
12 Nov 2001
20 Nov 2002
Exercise
Exercisable
Exercisable
Options at
1 January
price (US$)
from
until
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
1 Jul 2008
1 Jul 1999
11.29 14 May 1998 14 May 2007
14.60 10 Nov 1998 10 Nov 2007
17.08 15 Jun 1999 15 Jun 2008
19.21
13.71 9 Nov 1999 9 Nov 2008
16.99 17 May 2000 17 May 2009
13.96 31 Aug 2000 31 Aug 2009
16.96 8 Nov 2000 8 Nov 2009
15.70 30 Jun 2001 30 Jun 2010
13.26
8 Feb 2010
18.40 13 Nov 2001 13 Nov 2010
21.37 12 Nov 2002 12 Nov 2011
10.66 20 Nov 20032
20 Nov 2012
8 Feb 2001
100,315
573,684
802,500
80,250
2,020,741
334,375
337,051
4,782,902
26,846
66,875
6,349,114
7,571,322
3,125,202
–
490,088
802,500
–
1,179,175
–
36,113
532,325
–
–
620,600
–
670,904
100,315
83,596
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
80,250
841,566
334,375
300,938
4,250,577
26,846
66,875
5,728,514
7,571,322
2,454,298
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.37.
2 25 per cent of the original award was exercisable on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of award. The
exercise period may be advanced to an earlier date in certain circumstances, e.g. retirement.
HSBC Finance: 1996 Long-Term Executive Incentive Compensation Plan1
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
15 Nov 2002
20 Nov 2002
2 Dec 2002
16 Dec 2002
20 Dec 2002
2 Jan 2003
15 Jan 2003
3 Feb 2003
14 Feb 2003
3 Mar 2003
Vesting
from2
Vesting
until2
15 Nov 2005
20 Nov 2005
2 Dec 2005
16 Dec 2005
20 Dec 2005
2 Jan 2006
15 Jan 2006
3 Feb 2006
14 Feb 2006
3 Mar 2006
15 Nov 2007
20 Nov 2007
2 Dec 2007
16 Dec 2007
20 Dec 2007
2 Jan 2008
15 Jan 2008
3 Feb 2008
14 Feb 2008
3 Mar 2008
Rights at
1 January
2007
Rights
vested
during year3
Rights
lapsed
during year
Rights at
31 December
2007
2,409
539,027
3,123
11,774
88,286
893
20,959
6,344
98,265
893
1,517
518,417
1,339
11,774
88,286
446
10,479
3,170
49,131
446
892
20,610
–
–
–
–
–
268
–
–
–
–
1,784
–
–
447
10,480
2,906
49,134
447
1 Awards of Restricted Stock Rights which represent a right to receive shares for nil consideration if the employee remains in the
employment of HSBC Finance at the date of vesting.
2 Restricted Stock Rights vest one third on each of the third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the date of award. The exercise period may
be advanced to an earlier date in certain circumstances, e.g. retirement.
3 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which rights vested was £8.47.
Beneficial Corporation: 1990 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
14 Nov 1997
19 Nov 1997
1 Dec 1997
Exercise
Exercisable
Exercisable
Options at
1 January
price (US$)
from
until
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
9.20
9.39
9.68
14 Nov 1998 14 Nov 2007
19 Nov 1998 19 Nov 2007
1 Dec 1998 1 Dec 2007
131,248
309,225
49,218
–
309,225
–
131,248
–
49,218
–
–
–
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.22.
315
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Employees > Subsidiary company share plans / Employee compensation
Beneficial Corporation: BenShares Equity Participation Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
31 Jan 1997
15 Nov 1997
Exercise
Exercisable
Exercisable
Options at
1 January
price (US$)
from
until
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
9.87 31 Jan 1998 31 Jan 2007
11.04 15 Nov 1998 15 Nov 2007
20,113
36,407
10,261
32,837
9,852
3,570
–
–
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.05.
Renaissance Holdings, Inc: Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
31 Oct 1997
1 Jan 1998
1 Oct 1998
1 Jan 1999
Exercise
Exercisable
Exercisable
Options at
1 January
price (US$)
from
until
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
1.25 31 Oct 1998 31 Oct 2007
1 Jan 2008
1.25
1 Oct 2008
1.74
1 Jan 2009
2.24
1 Jan 1999
1 Oct 1999
1 Jan 2000
1,325
1,424
803
5,024
1,071
–
–
–
254
–
–
–
–
1,424
803
5,024
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £8.92.
Bank of Bermuda
Following the acquisition of Bank of Bermuda in
2004, all outstanding options over Bank of Bermuda
shares were converted into rights to receive HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares based on the consideration
of US$40 for each Bank of Bermuda share and the
average closing price of HSBC Holdings ordinary
shares, derived from the London Stock Exchange
Daily Official List, for the five business days
preceding the closing date of the acquisition. No
further options will be granted under any of these
plans.
All outstanding options over Bank of Bermuda
shares vested on completion of the acquisition. The
following are details of options to acquire shares in
HSBC Holdings. At 31 December 2007, the HSBC
(Bank of Bermuda) Employee Benefit Trust 2004
held 1,889,903 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares
which may be used to satisfy the exercise of these
options.
Bank of Bermuda: Executive Share Option Plan 1997
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
Exercise
price (US$)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
1 Jul 1998
23 Feb 1999
3 Aug 1999
4 Feb 2000
1 Jun 2000
31 Jul 2000
11 Jan 2001
1 Jul 1999
9.61
1 Jul 2008
7.40 23 Feb 2000 23 Feb 2009
7.10 3 Aug 2000 3 Aug 2009
4 Feb 2010
7.21
4 Feb 2001
1 Jun 2010
7.04
1 Jun 2001
10.11 31 Jul 2001 31 Jul 2010
14.27 11 Jan 2002 11 Jan 2011
67,813
11,684
9,331
40,185
61,649
27,744
161,829
–
6,780
1,697
8,507
–
–
107,886
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
67,813
4,904
7,634
31,678
61,649
27,744
53,943
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £8.95.
316
Bank of Bermuda: Share Option Plan 2000
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
Exercise
price (US$)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
Options
exercised
during year1
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
11 Jan 2001
6 Feb 2001
29 Mar 2001
16 Apr 2001
6 Jun 2001
16 Jul 2001
28 Aug 2001
26 Sep 2001
30 Jan 2002
5 Feb 2002
10 Jul 2002
4 Feb 2003
21 Apr 2003
14.27 11 Jan 2002 11 Jan 2011
6 Feb 2011
6 Feb 2002
16.41
15.39 29 Mar 2002 29 Mar 2011
15.57 16 Apr 2002 16 Apr 2011
18.35
6 Jun 2011
6 Jun 2002
16.87 16 Jul 2002 16 Jul 2011
15.39 28 Aug 2002 28 Aug 2011
12.79 26 Sep 2002 26 Sep 2011
15.60 30 Jan 2003 30 Jan 2012
16.09
5 Feb 2012
5 Feb 2003
15.84 10 Jul 2003 10 Jul 2012
4 Feb 2013
4 Feb 2004
10.69
11.85 21 Apr 2004 21 Apr 2013
134,857
630,646
270
539
8,091
14,930
13,486
438,585
1,226
865,382
12,260
139,658
20,840
–
51,084
–
–
–
–
–
84,694
–
95,775
–
6,616
14,007
–
4,392
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,836
–
–
–
134,857
575,170
270
539
8,091
14,930
13,486
353,891
1,226
762,771
12,260
133,042
6,833
1 The weighted average closing price of the shares immediately before the dates on which options were exercised was £9.08.
Bank of Bermuda: Directors’ Share Option Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
Date of
award
Exercise
price (US$)
Exercisable
from
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
Options
exercised
during year
Options
lapsed
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
22 Sep 1999
20 Sep 2000
28 Mar 2001
3 Apr 2002
30 Apr 2003
8.02 22 Sep 2000 22 Sep 2009
11.31 20 Sep 2001 20 Sep 2010
15.76 28 Mar 2002 28 Mar 2011
16.01
3 Apr 2012
3 Apr 2003
12.23 30 Apr 2004 30 Apr 2013
3,082
4,046
12,811
24,520
4,904
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
3,082
4,046
12,811
24,520
4,904
Employee compensation and benefits
Their emoluments are within the following
Note 9 on the Financial Statements gives details
about employee compensation and benefits including
pension plans.
Set out below is information in respect of the
five individuals (including a Director of HSBC
Holdings) whose emoluments were the highest in
HSBC for the year ended 31 December 2007.
Basic salaries, allowances and benefits in
kind ..........................................................
Pension contributions ..................................
Bonuses paid or receivable ..........................
Total .............................................................
Total (US$000) ............................................
£000
2,797
500
24,566
27,863
55,775
bands:
£3,700,001 – £3,800,000 .............................
£4,400,001 – £4,500,000 .............................
£4,700,001 – £4,800,000 .............................
£4,900,001 – £5,000,000 .............................
£9,900,001 – £10,000,000 ...........................
Number of
Employees
1
1
1
1
1
The aggregate remuneration of Directors and
Senior Management for the year ended 31 December
2007 was US$92,586,000.
The aggregate amount set aside or accrued to
provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for
Directors and Senior Management for the year ended
31 December 2007 was US$2,027,455.
Executive Directors and members of Senior
Management are generally subject to notice periods
of up to 12 months and a normal retirement age
of 65.
317
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Corporate sustainability
Corporate sustainability
Corporate sustainability is the term used at HSBC to
describe the Group’s approach to meeting a wide
range of non-financial responsibilities which,
although not generally enshrined as legal or
regulatory requirements, constitute business
practices expected of the Group by its stakeholders,
including shareholders, customers and employees.
Insofar as these expectations concern HSBC’s
impact on the long-term environmental, social and
economic well-being of the world at large, corporate
sustainability influences the Group’s response to
encouraging sustainable development. Previously,
HSBC described these activities under the heading,
‘Corporate responsibility’.
Investing in sustainability
HSBC seeks to meet society’s expectations by
managing all aspects of its business ethically,
responsibly and in an increasingly sustainable way.
The Group’s key business values include a
commitment to the highest personal standards of
integrity at all levels, including honesty,
transparency and fair dealing in all its business
activities. In recent years HSBC has intensified its
efforts to embed sustainability into the way it
manages risk and business development
opportunities. This acknowledges that HSBC’s
continuing financial success depends, in part, on
its ability to identify and address non-financial
considerations which are material to the business.
Recognising that HSBC’s core financial
services businesses have the potential to exert the
most influence over sustainability issues, a Group
Corporate Sustainability unit was formed in 2007
to work closely with individuals and businesses
in all customer groups to help them to manage
sustainability risks and to pursue opportunities in
environmental markets worldwide.
Group Corporate Sustainability acts as a focal
point for the management of HSBC’s environmental
and social initiatives. Environmental initiatives are
directed primarily to issues arising from climate
change, including its effect on energy production and
usage, water management and biodiversity. Social
initiatives are centred on community action to
promote education as a lasting way of alleviating
poverty. The Group Corporate Sustainability unit
allows HSBC to join up its business development,
risk management, business operations, community
investment and reporting activities. The unit also
works closely with Group Marketing to further
embed sustainability into the brand; with Group
Communications to ensure that sustainability
318
initiatives are communicated to internal and external
audiences; and with Group Human Resources to
integrate this area into employee engagement and
talent management strategies. The unit reports
directly to the Group Chairman.
HSBC aims for consistency in the
implementation of its sustainability strategy across
all Group businesses, and has identified four themes
as relevant to its response to the United Nations
Millennium Development Goals of resisting climate
change, achieving water availability, protecting
biodiversity and alleviating poverty. These themes
are risk management (policies and processes);
business development; operations (buildings, travel,
suppliers and IT); and community investment
(education and environment).
The Group’s Sustainable Risk Management
Unit has published policies laying down minimum
standards for lending and investment covering
relationships with clients in energy, forest land and
products, freshwater infrastructure, mining and
metals and the chemicals industry. Each policy
focuses on how HSBC’s involvement in these
environmentally sensitive industries can contribute
to sustainable development.
In recognition of its leadership in building
responsible practices into the way it does business,
HSBC moved from 7th to 4th in the Accountability
Rating prepared by Accountability. HSBC continued
to earn a high score of 95 and a triple-A rating in the
Carbon Disclosure Project, a climate change index
ranking FT500 corporations.
In 2005, HSBC was the first major banking
organisation in the world to become carbon neutral.
HSBC remains committed to reducing its own
carbon emissions and helping to bring about a
low-carbon economy.
HSBC created a Climate Change Centre of
Excellence in 2007. The Centre’s goal is to evaluate
the implications of climate change for the HSBC
Group, its Global Research division and relevant
businesses. The Centre is HSBC’s central source of
climate knowledge, translating a wide range of
expertise – from academic studies, think tanks and
government regulations – into business opportunities
for the bank and its clients. The Centre works closely
with HSBC’s Global Research sector heads and
analysts on integrating the financial implications of
climate change and relevant government regulations
into their sectoral research. It also supports the
implementation of HSBC’s Carbon Finance
Strategy, announced in June 2006, and advises a
range of HSBC businesses for which climate change
is increasingly important.
In 2007, HSBC appointed Lord Stern, the
renowned academic and former World Bank Chief
Economist, as Special Adviser to the Chairman on
Economic Development and Climate Change. Lord
Stern is responsible for advising HSBC on economic
development issues and the implications of climate
change on the Group and its clients. His role
includes:
•
•
•
•
providing direct advice on specific strategic
issues in emerging markets where the bank has
aspirations to grow its business;
advising on the socio-economic implications of
climate change and representing HSBC on these
issues;
contributing to management development
programmes, from graduate intake through to
senior management development activities; and
providing advice to major clients of the Group
who seek to develop sustainable business
strategies or other programmes relating to
climate change and to economic development
issues.
Community involvement
HSBC has a longstanding commitment to supporting
the communities in which it operates. In 2006, for
example, the HSBC Global Education Trust
launched ‘Future First’, a five-year programme
designed to help street children, children in care and
orphans. HSBC’s operations around the world
collaborate with local charitable organisations to
make a lasting and beneficial difference by
supporting projects that bring these children into the
mainstream of society. The programme complements
HSBC’s sustainable business development focus on
poverty, for which a microfinance strategy was
developed during 2006. To date, US$2 million has
been allocated to 80 projects in 30 countries. These
projects will benefit 37,000 children.
In May 2007, the Group Chairman launched
the HSBC Climate Partnership, committing
US$100 million over five years to fund the work
of The Climate Group, Earthwatch Institute,
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and WWF
to inspire action by individuals, businesses and
governments around the world on the challenge of
climate change. The HSBC Climate Partnership,
which will strengthen the Group’s leadership
position and help HSBC employees to use their
business skills and climate change knowledge to
build a more sustainable future, represents one of
the largest single corporate donations to each of the
charity partners and one of the largest employee
engagement programmes by any organisation on
climate change.
319
HSBC participated in the Prince of Wales’
Accounting for Sustainability Project, which seeks to
develop systems to help public and private sector
organisations account more accurately for the wider
social and environmental costs of their activities.
Health and safety
The maintenance of appropriate health and safety
standards throughout HSBC remains a key
responsibility of all managers and HSBC is
committed to managing actively all health and safety
risks associated with its business. HSBC’s objectives
are to identify, remove, reduce or control material
risks of fires and of accidents or injuries to
employees and visitors.
Health and Safety Policies, Group standards and
procedures are set by Group Corporate Real Estate
and are implemented by Health, Safety and Fire
Co-ordinators based in each country in which HSBC
operates.
Despite the considerable international pressure
on terrorist networks over the past few years, the
global threat from terrorism persists. HSBC remains
committed to maintaining its preparedness and to
ensuring the highest standards of health and safety
wherever in the world it operates.
Group Security provides regular risk
assessments in areas of increased risk to assist
management in judging the level of terrorist threat.
In addition, Regional Security functions conduct
regular security reviews to ensure measures to
protect HSBC staff, buildings, assets and
information are appropriate for the level of threat.
Supplier payment policy
HSBC Holdings subscribes to the Better Payment
Practice Code for all suppliers, the four principles of
which are: to agree payment terms at the outset and
stick to them; to explain payment procedures to
suppliers; to pay bills in accordance with any
contract agreed with the supplier or as required by
law; and to tell suppliers without delay when an
invoice is contested and settle disputes quickly.
Copies of, and information about, the Code are
available from: BERR Publications Orderline,
Admail 528, London SW1W 8YT; and the internet at
www.payontime.co.uk/downloads/DTI_BPP_
brochure.pdf
It is HSBC Holdings’ practice to organise
payment to its suppliers through a central accounts
function operated by its subsidiary, HSBC Bank.
Included in the balance with HSBC Bank is the
amount due to trade creditors which, at 31 December
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Report of the Directors: Governance (continued)
Corporate sustainability / Dividends, shareholders and meetings
2007, represented 22 days’ average daily purchases
of goods and services received from such creditors,
calculated in accordance with the Companies Act
1985, as amended by Statutory Instrument 1997/571.
Donations
During the year, HSBC made charitable donations
totalling US$101 million (2006: US$86.3 million).
Of this amount, US$36.8 million (2006:
US$32.8 million) was given for charitable
purposes in the UK. No political donations were
made during the year.
At the Annual General Meeting in 2007,
shareholders renewed the authorities for HSBC
Holdings and HSBC Bank to make EU political
donations and incur EU political expenditure up to
a maximum aggregate sum of £250,000 and £50,000
respectively as a precautionary measure in light of
the wide definitions in The Political Parties,
Elections and Referendums Act 2000. These
authorities have not been used and will expire on
the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting to
be held in 2008.
Sustainability reporting
HSBC reports on its progress towards meeting the
Group’s environmental reduction targets and
provides information for stakeholders in the annual
HSBC Sustainability Report (previously called the
Corporate Responsibility Report). The contents
of the report are informed by feedback from
stakeholder engagement forums, and are prepared
using the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines. The
report is verified by an external assurance provider
to demonstrate to stakeholders that the information
disclosed in the report is complete and covers
material aspects of HSBC’s business. The HSBC
Sustainability Report 2007 will be available at
www.hsbc.com/sustainabilityreport from June 2008.
Dividends, shareholders and
meetings
dividend alternative. As the fourth interim dividend
for 2007 was declared after the balance sheet date it
has not been included as a creditor at 31 December
2007. The reserves available for distribution at
31 December 2007 are US$15,551 million.
A quarterly dividend of US$15.50 per 6.20 per
cent non-cumulative US dollar preference share,
Series A (‘Series A dollar preference share’),
equivalent to a dividend of US$0.3875 per Series A
American Depositary Share, each of which
represents one-fortieth of a Series A dollar
preference share, was paid on 15 March, 15 June,
17 September and 17 December 2007.
Dividends for 2008
The proposed timetable for interim dividends in
respect of 2008 on the ordinary shares of US$0.50 is
set out in the Shareholder Information section on
page 454.
A quarterly dividend of US$15.50 per Series A
dollar preference share (equivalent to a dividend of
US$0.3875 per Series A American Depositary Share,
each of which represents one-fortieth of a Series A
dollar preference share) was declared on 13 February
2008 for payment on 17 March 2008.
Communication with shareholders
Communication with shareholders is given high
priority. Extensive information about HSBC’s
activities is provided in the Annual Report and
Accounts, Annual Review and the Interim Report
which are sent to shareholders and are available on
www.hsbc.com. There is regular dialogue with
institutional investors and enquiries from individuals
on matters relating to their shareholdings and the
business of HSBC are welcomed and are dealt
with in an informative and timely manner. All
shareholders are encouraged to attend the Annual
General Meeting or the informal meeting of
shareholders held in Hong Kong to discuss the
progress of HSBC.
Dividends for 2007
Notifiable interests in share capital
First, second and third interim dividends for 2007,
each of US$0.17 per ordinary share, were paid on
5 July 2007, 4 October 2007 and 16 January 2008
respectively. Note 12 on the Financial Statements
gives more information on the dividends declared in
2007. On 3 March 2008, the Directors declared a
fourth interim dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per
ordinary share in lieu of a final dividend, which will
be payable on 7 May 2008 in cash in US dollars, or
in sterling or Hong Kong dollars at exchange rates to
be determined on 28 April 2008, with a scrip
As at 3 March 2008, the following disclosures of
major holdings of voting rights have been made to
the Company pursuant to the requirements of the
Financial Services Authority Disclosure and
Transparency Rule 5:
• Singularis Holdings Limited; AWAL Trust
Company Limited; and Maan Abdulwahed
Al-Sanea gave notice on 16 April 2007 that it
had an indirect interest on 16 April 2007 in
360,055,575 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares,
320
representing 3.11 per cent of the ordinary shares
in issue at that date.
• Barclays PLC gave notice on 17 April 2007 that
it had an indirect interest on 16 April 2007 in
518,233,657 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares,
representing 4.47 per cent of the ordinary shares
in issue at that date.
• Legal & General Group Plc gave notice on
14 August 2007 that it had a direct interest on
8 August 2007 in 480,363,459 HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares, representing 4.08 per cent of
the ordinary shares in issue at that date.
There are no notifiable interests in the equity
share capital recorded in the register maintained
under section 336 of the Securities and Futures
Ordinance of Hong Kong.
In compliance with the Rules Governing the
Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of
Hong Kong Limited at least 25 per cent of the total
issued share capital of HSBC Holdings has been held
by the public at all times during 2007 and up to the
date of this Report.
Dealings in HSBC Holdings shares
Except for dealings as intermediaries by HSBC
Bank, HSBC Financial Products (France) and The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation,
which are members of a European Economic
Area exchange, neither HSBC Holdings nor any
subsidiary has bought, sold or redeemed any
securities of HSBC Holdings during the year
ended 31 December 2007.
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting of HSBC Holdings
will be held at the Barbican Hall, Barbican Centre,
London EC2 on 30 May 2008 at 11.00am.
An informal meeting of shareholders will be
held at Level 28, 1 Queen’s Road Central, Hong
Kong on Tuesday 27 May 2008 at 4.30pm.
Resolutions to receive the Annual Report
and Accounts, approve the Directors’ Remuneration
Report, re-elect Directors and reappoint KPMG
Audit Plc as Auditor will be submitted to the Annual
General Meeting. KPMG Audit Plc has expressed its
willingness to continue in office and the Group
Audit Committee and the Board have recommended
that KPMG Audit Plc be reappointed. Resolutions
will also be submitted to the Annual General
Meeting to renew the authorities for the allotment of
shares, the disapplication of pre-emption rights and
the purchase of ordinary shares. In addition,
resolutions will be proposed to amend The HSBC
Share Plan and to seek approval for changes to the
Articles of Association.
A live webcast of the Annual General Meeting
will be available on www.hsbc.com. From shortly
after the conclusion of the Meeting until 30 June
2008 a recording of the proceedings will be available
on www.hsbc.com.
On behalf of the Board
S K Green, Group Chairman
3 March 2008
321
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Directors’ Remuneration Report
Remuneration committee / Principles / Executive Directors > Remuneration from 2008
Page
Remuneration policy (not audited)
Remuneration Committee .............................
Overall principles ..........................................
Executive Directors .......................................
Proposed changes to remuneration
arrangements from 2008 ........................
Current arrangements ...............................
Performance conditions .............................
Funding ......................................................
Total Shareholder Return ..........................
Pensions .....................................................
Share ownership guidelines .......................
Service contracts ........................................
Other directorships ....................................
Non-executive Directors ...............................
Fees ...........................................................
Remuneration review (audited)
Directors’ emoluments ..................................
Pensions ........................................................
Share plans ....................................................
322
322
322
322
324
325
327
327
327
327
328
328
328
328
329
330
330
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee meets regularly to
consider human resource issues, particularly terms
and conditions of employment, remuneration and
retirement benefits. Within the authority delegated
by the Board, the Committee is responsible for
approving the remuneration policy of HSBC
including the terms of bonus plans, share plans and
other long-term incentive plans and for agreeing the
individual remuneration packages of executive
Directors and other senior Group employees. No
Directors are involved in deciding their own
remuneration.
Following each meeting the Committee reports
to the Board on its activities. The terms of reference
of the Committee are available at
www.hsbc.com/boardcommittees.
The members of the Remuneration Committee
throughout 2007 were Sir Mark Moody-Stuart
(Chairman) and J D Coombe. At the conclusion of
the Annual General Meeting on 25 May 2007
W K L Fung and S Hintze retired as members of the
Committee and G Morgan became a member of the
Committee.
There were eight meetings of the Remuneration
Committee during 2007. The table on page 296 gives
details of Directors’ attendance at these meetings.
In July 2007, following a competitive tender
process, Mercer Limited, a firm of specialist human
resources consultants, was appointed by the
322
Committee to provide independent advice on
executive remuneration issues. As a global firm,
Mercer also provides other remuneration consulting
services to various parts of HSBC. Towers Perrin
continues to provide remuneration data to the
Remuneration Committee. Other consultants are
used from time to time to advise on specific issues.
During the year the Group Chief Executive provided
regular briefings to the Remuneration Committee.
The Committee received advice from the Group
General Manager, Human Resources, being P Boyles
until June 2007 and thereafter A Almeida, and the
Head of Group Performance and Reward, J Beadle.
Overall principles
In carrying out its responsibilities, the Remuneration
Committee applies the following key principles:
•
•
•
•
to ensure that the total remuneration package
(salary, bonus, long-term incentive awards and
other benefits) is competitive in relation to
comparable organisations in each of the markets
in which HSBC operates;
to offer fair and realistic salaries with a focus on
variable pay, differentiated by performance;
through awards of shares to recognise high
performance, retain key talent and provide
alignment with the interests of shareholders; and
to follow a policy of moving progressively from
defined benefit to defined contribution pension
schemes.
The Committee also considers corporate
performance on environmental, social and
governance factors when determining the executive
Directors’ remuneration. In addition, the
Remuneration Committee has oversight that the
incentive structure for senior management does not
raise environmental, social and governance risks by
inadvertently motivating irresponsible behaviour.
Executive Directors
Proposed changes to remuneration
arrangements from 2008
In July 2007, the Remuneration Committee
requested that Mercer conduct a comprehensive
assessment of the remuneration arrangements of the
executive Directors and other senior executives. The
objective was to ensure close alignment with
HSBC’s business strategy, taking into account
competitive market practice.
As part of this review, the Committee updated
the remuneration comparator group to reflect more
accurately the market in which the Company
competes for executive talent. This group will
comprise nine global financial services companies,
namely Banco Santander, Bank of America,
Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank,
Royal Bank of Scotland, Standard Chartered and
UBS. These companies were selected on the basis of
their broadly similar business coverage, size and
international scope.
While in general HSBC salaries for executive
Directors were in the upper quartile of this
comparator group, total cash (base salary and bonus)
and total compensation (base salary, cash bonus and
the expected value of long-term incentive awards)
were generally at the lower quartile.
The Committee concluded that while the overall
remuneration principles described above remain
appropriate, the remuneration strategy should be
refined by targeting base salary at the market median
of the comparator group, while providing an
opportunity for top quartile total compensation for
higher levels of performance. At the same time, a
greater proportion of total compensation will be
share based, and shareholding requirements will be
increased.
In order to achieve this, the following steps are
proposed:
• For the executive Directors in place at the end of
2007, where base salaries are above market
median no increases are being made in 2008.
This applies to the Group Chairman, Group
Chief Executive and Group Finance Director;
• The maximum annual bonus opportunity will be
increased from 250 to 400 per cent of salary for
the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance
Director, with the criteria for bonus awards
being made more specific and 40 per cent of any
award being deferred into HSBC Restricted
Shares;
• The performance measures and vesting
conditions attached to long-term incentive
awards of Performance Shares under The HSBC
Share Plan will be amended in order to further
align the reward of senior executives to the
achievement of HSBC’s strategy and the
interests of its shareholders; and
• The required shareholding of senior executives
under the share ownership guidelines will be
increased to the equivalent of four to five times
base salary to demonstrate further alignment
with shareholders.
This proposed policy would generally apply to
all executive Directors from 2008 onwards. Under
323
the proposed arrangements, the performance-related
proportion of the remuneration package will increase
with the performance-related elements making up
around 80 per cent of the remuneration package.
Under the current arrangements, the performance-
related proportion of the remuneration package is
typically around 70 per cent of total compensation.
The arrangements for S T Gulliver, who has
been appointed a Director with effect from 1 May
2008, will reflect the market practice in the Global
Banking and Markets sector where a greater
performance-related element is typical.
The net effect of these changes would mean, for
example, that the Group Chief Executive’s total
compensation, on an expected value basis, would be
at market median of the comparator group, but with
a significantly higher proportion of share-based
compensation than the group.
As part of the Company’s on-going commitment
to shareholder engagement, the largest institutional
shareholders, representing approximately 50 per cent
of the share capital of HSBC Holdings, the
Association of British Insurers and the National
Association of Pension Funds, are being consulted
on these proposals. The planned implementation of
these changes will be as follows:
Salary
As stated above, in 2008, in view of the current
competitive positioning of base salaries, the
Remuneration Committee will not increase base
salaries for the executive Directors in place at the
end of 2007.
The base salaries for executive Directors
appointed to the Board after the 2007 financial year
will be set in light of the overall remuneration
principles set out above.
Any future salary increases will be considered in
the light of the remuneration strategy, which targets
base salary at market median, and the market data
from the remuneration comparator group.
A similar approach has been adopted for other
senior executives across the Group.
Annual bonus
From the 2008 performance year, objectives will be
set and assessed using a ‘balanced scorecard’. This
will include financial and non-financial performance
measures, with an emphasis on tangible, measurable
targets to ensure the appropriate alignment with
HSBC’s strategy in the assessment of annual bonus
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Directors’ Remuneration Report (continued)
Executive Directors > Current arrangements / Performance conditions
awards. Example measures for the Group Chief
Executive are set out below:
Financial
• EPS
• ROE
• Cost efficiency ratio
Customer
• Customer recommendation
• Brand health
Process
People
• Operational losses
• Regulatory relationship
• Employee engagement
• Leadership
The Committee intends to provide significantly
greater transparency in subsequent Reports regarding
both the performance measures and the achievement
against performance targets, together with a
commentary on the resulting levels of bonus awards.
Long-term incentive plan
The long-term incentive plan (‘LTIP’) was last
reviewed in 2005 when, with the adoption of The
HSBC Share Plan, a growth in earnings per share
measure (‘EPS’) was introduced alongside Total
Shareholder Return (‘TSR’) relative to a peer group
of 28 banks.
The Committee is proposing changes to the
performance measures and vesting conditions of the
long-term incentive awards of Performance Shares
under The HSBC Share Plan, the details of which
will be described in the circular containing the
Notice of the 2008 Annual General Meeting, which
is expected to be sent to shareholders in April 2008,
and submitted to shareholder vote at that Meeting.
Awards will be granted to executive Directors
and other senior executives shortly after the Meeting.
These will be made under the amended Plan subject
to the proposed changes to the Plan receiving
shareholder approval.
Current arrangements
Salary
The Committee reviews salary levels for executive
Directors each year.
As described above, the Remuneration
Committee will not increase base salaries for current
executive Directors in 2008.
D J Flint ...................................
M F Geoghegan .......................
S K Green ................................
2008
£000
700
1,070
1,250
2007
£000
700
1,070
1,250
324
Annual cash bonus
The annual cash bonus for executive Directors is
based upon individual performance as well as
performance measured against a number of key
financial targets for the Group, including financial
(e.g. revenue growth, economic profit and cost
efficiency). Annual bonus payments are not
pensionable.
The Committee took into account the Group’s
absolute performance and relative performance
compared to its peers in a challenging operating
environment, in setting the overall bonus payment
levels.
There were significant increases in profit
before tax, earnings per share and improvements
in cost efficiencies during 2007. During that year
management moved effectively to resolve the issues
identified in late 2006 in the United States in relation
to consumer lending, and to anticipate and respond
to the sector-wide liquidity crisis.
On this basis, the Remuneration Committee
approved annual bonus payments for the following
executive Directors in 2008 in respect of 2007
performance (payments made in 2007 in respect of
2006 performance are shown for reference):
D J Flint ...................................
M F Geoghegan .......................
2008
£000
800
2,140
2007
£000
500
1,750
Chairman’s variable compensation
The Committee has determined, at the request of
the Chairman, that future variable compensation
payments to the Chairman will be delivered
exclusively through Performance Share awards
given the key focus of the role of the Chairman in
the formation and management of Group strategy.
The Remuneration Committee approved an
annual bonus payment for the Chairman for 2008, in
respect of 2007 performance, that was unchanged
from the prior performance year as indicated in the
table below (the payment made in 2007 in respect of
2006 performance is shown for reference):
2008
£000
1,750
2007
£000
1,750
S K Green .................................
Long-term incentive plan
Under The HSBC Share Plan, executive Directors,
as with other participants in the Plan, are eligible to
receive awards of Performance Shares with a face
value at grant of up to a maximum of seven times
salary. The individual awards received in any one
year are based on market competitive information
and individual performance. The face and expected
values of individual awards made in 2007 are set out
in the table below (awards made in 2006 are shown
for reference).
2007 awards
D J Flint ........................................................................
M F Geoghegan2 ...........................................................
S K Green3 ....................................................................
Face value
2007
£000
2,200
5,000
3,750
Total ..............................................................................
10,950
2006
£000
1,600
2,000
2,500
6,100
Expected value1
2007
£000
968
2,200
1,650
4,818
2006
£000
704
880
1,100
2,684
1 44 per cent of the face value.
2 M F Geoghegan’s 2006 award relates to his position as Chief Executive of HSBC Bank plc, prior to his current role as Group Chief
Executive of HSBC Holdings.
3 S K Green’s 2006 award relates to his position as Group Chief Executive.
Vesting of the awards is subject to the
performance conditions described in the next
section being met. Shares released will include
additional shares equivalent to the value of the
dividends payable on the vested shares over the
performance period.
Performance conditions
Arrangements from 2005 to 2007
Vesting of the awards of Performance Shares under
The HSBC Share Plan is based on two independent
measures, relative TSR and growth in EPS. The
performance conditions are measured over a three-
year performance period and awards forfeited to
the extent that they have not been met. The vesting
of 50 per cent of the awards is based on TSR and
the remaining 50 per cent on growth in EPS.
TSR award
The comparator group of 28 banks for the TSR
award comprises the largest banks in the world,
on the basis of their market capitalisation, their
geographic spread and the nature of their activities:
ABN AMRO
Banco Santander
Bank of America
Bank of New York
Barclays
BBVA
BNP Paribas
Citigroup
Crédit Agricole
Credit Suisse Group
Deutsche Bank
HBOS
JP Morgan Chase
Lloyds TSB
Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group
Mizuho Financial Group
Morgan Stanley
National Australia Bank
Royal Bank of Canada
Royal Bank of Scotland
Société Générale
Standard Chartered
UBS
UniCredito Italiano
US Bancorp
Wachovia
Wells Fargo
Westpac Banking Corporation
The extent to which the TSR award will vest
will be determined on a sliding scale based on
325
HSBC’s relative TSR ranking, measured over the
three years, against the comparator group as shown
below:
If HSBC’s performance
matches
Banks ranking 1st to 7th
Bank ranking 8th
Bank ranking 9th
Bank ranking 10th
Bank ranking 11th
Bank ranking 12th
Bank ranking 13th
Bank ranking 14th
Banks ranking below 14th
Proportion of TSR Award
vesting1
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
nil
1 Vesting will occur in a straight line where HSBC’s
performance falls between these incremental steps.
EPS award
The method for calculating EPS growth has been
summarised in narrative form in the 2005 and 2006
Directors’ Remuneration Reports, as well as in the
circular containing the Notice of Annual General
Meeting for 2005.
This year’s Report sets out more information
(including a graph and an example) on the method
of calculation of EPS growth in light of some
questions from shareholders on the operation of
this element. The Committee regrets if there has
been any misunderstanding, but wishes to reassure
shareholders that the method of calculation, which
is set out in the rules of The HSBC Share Plan, has
remained unchanged since the Plan was adopted.
Further, before introducing the Plan in 2005, the
Committee consulted extensively with major
shareholders and their representative bodies in line
with best practice, and the rules of the Plan
including worked examples of the EPS calculation
were available for inspection at the time.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Directors’ Remuneration Report (continued)
Executive Directors > Performance conditions / TSR
The percentage of the conditional award
vesting will depend upon the absolute growth
in EPS achieved over the three years (‘the
performance period’). 30 per cent of the conditional
shares will vest if the incremental EPS over the
performance period is 24 per cent or more of EPS
in the base year. The percentage of shares vesting
will rise on a straight line proportionate basis to
100 per cent if HSBC’s incremental EPS over the
performance period is 52 per cent or more of EPS
in the base year. In the interests of clarity, this has
been set out in graphical form in the chart below.
g
n
i
t
s
e
V
d
r
a
w
A
S
P
E
f
o
n
o
i
t
r
o
p
o
r
P
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0%
10%
20%
24%
30%
40%
50%
52%
60%
Total Incremental EPS Delivered
For the EPS element of the award, the base
measure shall be EPS for the financial year
preceding that in which the award is made (‘the
base year’). Absolute growth in EPS will then be
compared with the base year over three consecutive
financial years commencing with the year in which
the award is made. Incremental EPS will be
calculated by expressing as a percentage of the EPS
of the base year the difference each year of the
three-year performance period between the EPS of
that year and the EPS of the base year. These
percentages will then be aggregated to arrive at the
total incremental EPS for the performance period.
As illustrated in the table below, an incremental
EPS of 51 per cent over three years would equate to
a compound annual growth rate of 8 per cent.
Percentage difference between:
Year 1 EPS
and Base Year
EPS
Year 2 EPS
and Base Year
EPS
+
Year 3 EPS
and Base year
EPS
=
+
Total
incremental
EPS for the
performance
period
the year in question. In the event that the published
EPS for the base year is restated during the
performance period to adjust for changes in
accounting standards, that restated EPS will be
used for the purposes of the EPS performance
condition.
In addition, awards will not vest unless the
Remuneration Committee is satisfied that HSBC
Holdings’ financial performance has shown a
sustained improvement in the period since the
award date. In determining whether HSBC
Holdings has achieved a sustained improvement in
performance the Remuneration Committee will
take account of all relevant factors but in particular
comparisons against the comparator group in areas
such as revenue growth and mix, cost efficiency,
credit performance, cash return on cash invested,
dividend performance and TSR.
If events occur which cause the Remuneration
Committee to consider that a performance
condition has become unfair or impractical in either
direction, the right is reserved to the Remuneration
Committee, if it considers it appropriate to do so, to
amend, relax or waive the condition.
Awards will vest in full immediately in cases
of death. In the event of redundancy, retirement on
grounds of injury or ill health, early retirement by
agreement, normal retirement and where a
participant ceases to be employed by HSBC due to
a company ceasing to be part of HSBC, awards will
normally vest at the end of the vesting period on a
time-apportioned basis to the extent that the TSR
and EPS performance conditions have been
satisfied. In the event of a change of control,
awards will normally vest immediately and on a
time-apportioned basis to the extent that the TSR
performance condition has been satisfied. Awards
will normally be forfeited if the participant is
dismissed for cause or resigns from HSBC. In all
these circumstances the Committee retains
discretion to ensure fair and reasonable treatment.
8%
17%
26%
51%
Arrangements from 2002 to 2004
Illustration of incremental EPS of 51 per cent over three
years.
If EPS in any of the Years 1, 2 or 3 is below
the base year, then the percentage difference
between that particular year and the base year is
negative.
For this purpose, EPS means the profit
attributable to the Shareholders (expressed in US
dollars), excluding goodwill amortisation, divided
by the weighted average number of Ordinary
Shares in issue and held outside the Group during
Between 2002 and 2004, awards of Performance
Shares were made under the HSBC Holdings
Restricted Share Plan 2000. Vesting was based
on HSBC’s relative TSR performance over a
three-year period from the date of the award,
with full vesting of awards and transfer of shares
to participants being no earlier than the fifth
anniversary of the date of award.
The initial performance period was three
years from the date of award. Prior to 2004,
awards were subject to re-testing on the fourth
326
and fifth anniversaries of the date of award if
the performance target was not met at the third
anniversary. The awards made in 2004 had a
three-year performance period with no re-testing.
The table below describes the outcome of the
performance tests for the 2002, 2003 and 2004
awards:
First test (third anniversary) .. March 2005, performance
target met, awards vested in
2007
March 2006, performance
target not met
March 2007, performance
target not met, and therefore
award forfeited
2002 award
2003 award
2004 award
First re-test (fourth
anniversary) .......................
Already vested
March 2007, performance
target not met
No re-test
Second test (fifth
anniversary) .......................
Already vested
March 2008
No re-test
Graph 2: HSBC TSR and FTSE 100 Index
200%
190%
180%
170%
160%
150%
140%
130%
120%
110%
100%
Dec 2002
Dec 2003
Dec 2004
Dec 2005
Dec 2006
Dec 2007
HSBC TSR
FTSE 100
Source: Datastream
Pursuant to the Directors’ Remuneration Report
Regulations 2002, Graph 2 shows HSBC’s TSR
performance against the FTSE 100 Index, for the
five-year period ended 31 December 2007. The
FTSE 100 has been chosen as this is a recognised
broad equity market index of which HSBC Holdings
is a member.
Pensions
The normal retirement age for executive Directors
is 65. The pension entitlements earned by the
executive Directors during the year are set out on
page 330.
Share ownership guidelines
In line with a focus on highly leveraged variable pay,
HSBC operates a formal share ownership policy,
expressed as a number of shares, for the executive
Directors and the Group Managing Directors. The
Committee believes that material levels of share
ownership by executives create a community of
interest between the leadership team and
shareholder. The executive Directors and Group
Managing Directors are therefore required to build
and retain the following shareholdings:
In addition to these performance conditions,
none of the outstanding awards will vest unless the
Remuneration Committee is satisfied that, during the
performance period, HSBC Holdings has achieved
sustained growth. The Remuneration Committee
retains discretion to recommend early release of
shares awarded in certain circumstances, for
example, retirement, redundancy or ill health.
When events occur which cause the Remuneration
Committee to consider that the performance
conditions have become unfair or impractical, the
right is reserved for the Committee to amend or
substitute the performance conditions.
Funding
The Company’s policy is to fund long-term incentive
awards of Performance Shares and Restricted Shares
under The HSBC Share Plan through employee
benefit trusts which undertake market purchases of
HSBC Holdings’ shares. The dilution limits set out
in the HSBC share plans comply with the
Association of British Insurers’ guidelines.
Total Shareholder Return
The graphs below show how HSBC has performed
against the benchmark TSR used to determine
vesting for the 2004 Performance Share awards
and the FTSE 100 Index.
Graph 1: HSBC TSR and Benchmark TSR
150%
140%
130%
120%
110%
100%
Mar 2004
Mar 2005
Mar 2006
Mar 2007
HSBC TSR
TSR Benchmark
327
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Directors’ Remuneration Report (continued)
Executive Directors / Non-executive Directors / Directors’ emoluments
Number of shares
at 31
December
2007
to be held
Group Chairman ...............................
Group Chief Executive .....................
Group Finance Director ....................
Group Managing Directors ...............
300,000
300,000
100,000
75,000
536,652
385,189
112,781
–1
1 A majority of the Group Managing Directors exceed the
expected holdings; where the holdings are below, the
executives are within five years of their appointment and
working towards the expected level.
Under the guidelines, the shareholding is
expected to be achieved within five years of the
executive’s appointment or three years from the date
of approval of the guidelines (May 2007), whichever
is the later. All executive Directors and the majority
of Group Managing Directors exceed the required
shareholding. The Remuneration Committee will
monitor compliance annually prior to approving any
awards or vesting of Performance Shares. The
Remuneration Committee will have full discretion in
determining any penalties in case of non-
compliance, which could include: a reduction of
future awards of long-term incentives and/or an
increase in the proportion of the annual bonus that is
deferred into shares. Increases in the expected level
of share ownership will be introduced as part of the
refinements to reward strategy and structure from
2008 discussed above.
Service contracts
HSBC’s policy is to employ executive Directors on
one-year rolling contracts although longer initial
terms may be approved by the Remuneration
Committee if considered appropriate. The
Remuneration Committee will, consistent with
the best interests of the Group, seek to minimise
termination payments.
S K Green, M F Geoghegan and D J Flint have
rolling service contracts with a notice period of
12 months for either party save that D J Flint’s
contract provides for nine months’ notice to be
given by Mr Flint.
In the event of early termination of employment
of S K Green, M F Geoghegan, or D J Flint, other
than for cause, HSBC is entitled to make a payment
in lieu of notice equal in the case of D J Flint, to base
salary and pension entitlement and in the case of
S K Green and M F Geoghegan to base salary,
pension entitlements and other benefits.
In addition, on termination of employment by
HSBC, other than for cause (or termination by either
party within 12 months following a change of
control), S K Green and M F Geoghegan will be
328
eligible for a bonus calculated as not less than the
average of the previous two years of bonus payments
received, pro-rated for any part year worked to
termination.
The dates of executive Directors’ service
contracts are as follows:
D J Flint ............................................. 29 September 1995
24 May 2007
M F Geoghegan .................................
24 May 2007
S K Green ...........................................
Contract date
Other directorships
Executive Directors, if so authorised by either the
Nomination Committee or the Board, may accept
appointments as non-executive directors of suitable
companies which are not part of HSBC. Approval
will not be given for executive Directors to accept a
non-executive directorship of more than one FTSE
100 company. When considering a non-executive
appointment, the Nomination Committee or Board
will take into account the expected time commitment
of such appointment. The time commitment for
executive Directors’ external appointments will be
reviewed as part of the annual Board review. Any
remuneration receivable in respect of an external
appointment is normally paid to HSBC, unless
otherwise approved by the Remuneration
Committee. D J Flint does not retain his fees as a
non-executive Director of BP p.l.c.
Non-executive Directors
Non-executive Directors are appointed for fixed
terms not exceeding three years, subject to their
re-election by shareholders at Annual General
Meetings. Non-executive directors have no service
contract and are not eligible to participate in HSBC’s
share plans. Current non-executive Directors’ terms
of appointment will expire as follows: in 2008,
Lord Butler, Baroness Dunn and Sir Brian Moffat;
in 2009, W K L Fung, S W Newton, S M Robertson
and Sir Brian Williamson; in 2010, R A Fairhead,
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart and G Morgan; and in 2011,
J D Coombe, J L Dúran, J W J Hughes-Hallett and
W S H Laidlaw. S A Catz and N R N Murthy were
appointed non-executive Directors with effect from
1 May 2008. Subject to their re-election by
shareholders at the Annual General Meeting in 2008,
their terms of appointment will expire in 2011.
Fees
Non-executive Directors’ fees are regularly reviewed
and compared with other large international
companies. The current fee, which was approved by
shareholders in 2006, is £65,000 per annum.
A fee of £30,000 per annum is payable to the
senior independent non-executive Director. In
addition, non-executive Directors receive the
following fees for service on Board Committees:
Chairman, Audit Committee ................................. £50,000 p.a.
Member, Audit Committee .................................... £20,000 p.a.
During 2007, seven meetings of the Group Audit Committee
were held.
Chairman, Remuneration Committee .................... £40,000 p.a.
Member, Remuneration Committee ...................... £20,000 p.a.
During 2007, eight meetings of the Remuneration Committee
were held.
Chairman, Nomination Committee ....................... £30,000 p.a.
Member, Nomination Committee .......................... £20,000 p.a.
During 2007, two meetings of the Nomination Committee were
held.
Chairman, Corporate Sustainability Committee ... £30,000 p.a.
Member, Corporate Sustainability Committee ...... £20,000 p.a.
During 2007, five meetings of the Corporate Sustainability
Committee were held.
Directors’ emoluments
(Audited)
The emoluments of the Directors of HSBC Holdings for 2007 were as follows:
Fees
£000
Salary Allowance1
£000
£000
Benefits
in kind2
£000
Bonuses3
£000
Total
2007
£000
1,878
3,536
3,012
103
79
105
85
103
122
–
44
97
110
125
77
77
94
–
91
Total
2006
£000
1,355
2,868
2,934
115
200
97
85
85
136
–
105
77
145
125
16
65
65
–
85
Executive Directors
D J Flint ...........................
M F Geoghegan4 ..............
S K Green ........................
Non-executive Directors
Lord Butler ......................
R K F Ch’ien5, 6 ................
J D Coombe .....................
Baroness Dunn .................
R A Fairhead ....................
W K L Fung7.....................
J F Gil Diáz8......................
S Hintze5 ..........................
J W J Hughes-Hallett .......
Sir Brian Moffat ...............
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart ...
G Morgan..........................
S W Newton .....................
S M Robertson .................
H Sohmen5, 9 ....................
Sir Brian Williamson .......
Total10 ..............................
Total (US$000) 10 .............
–
–
–
103
79
105
85
103
122
–
44
97
110
125
77
77
94
–
91
679
1,040
1,250
374
520
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
25
61
12
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
800
1,915
1,750
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,312
2,626
2,969
5,943
894
1,790
98
196
4,465
8,938
9,738
19,493
11,485
21,139
1 Executive allowance paid to fund personal pension arrangements.
2 Benefits in kind for executive Directors include provision of company car, medical insurance, other insurance cover, accountancy
advice and travel assistance.
3 These discretionary bonuses are in respect of 2007. See page 324 for comparison with 2006.
4 In return for the prior waiver of part of his bonus, an employer contribution has been made into a pension arrangement for
M F Geoghegan equal to £225,000 (2006: £215,000) which would otherwise have been paid.
5 Retired as a Director on 25 May 2007.
6 Includes fees as non-executive Chairman of HSBC Private Equity (Asia) Limited and as a non-executive Director of The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking Corporation.
7 Includes fees as a non-executive Director of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.
8 Appointed as a Director on 2 January 2007 and retired as a Director on 5 March 2007. J F Gil Diáz elected to waive any fees payable
to him by HSBC Holdings (£10,833).
9 H Sohmen elected to waive any fees payable to him by HSBC Holdings (2007: £27,083; 2006: £65,000).
10 Total emoluments for 2006 include the emoluments of Directors who retired in that year.
329
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Directors’ Remuneration Report (continued)
Pensions / Share plans
Pensions
(Audited)
S K Green is entitled to receive benefits from an
Employer-Funded Retirement Benefits Scheme
(EFRBS). The benefits to which he is entitled from
the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme but in respect
of which he ceased membership on 5 April 2006,
will be calculated based on completed service to
the date of opting out and on pensionable salary
calculated at the date employment with HSBC
Holdings ceases. The intention of this arrangement
is to provide benefits to Mr Green that would be
broadly comparable to an accrual rate of one-
Accrued
annual
pension at
31 December
Increase in
accrued
pension
during
2007
£000
2007
£000
Increase in
accrued
pension
during 2007,
excluding
any increase
for inflation
£000
thirtieth of pensionable salary for each year of
pensionable service.
For M F Geoghegan an employer contribution
was made to the HSBC Asia Holdings Pension Plan
in respect of 2007 of £225,000 (2006: £215,000)
arising entirely from a bonus sacrifice. There were
no other employer contributions made to this plan.
Mr Geoghegan receives an executive allowance of
50 per cent of annual basic salary to fund personal
pension arrangements.
D J Flint receives an executive allowance of
55 per cent of annual basic salary to fund personal
pension arrangements.
Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
31 December
20061
£000
Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
31 December
20071
£000
Increase of
transfer value
of accrued
pension (less
personal
contributions)
in 20071
£000
Transfer value
(less personal
contributions) at
31 December 2007
relating to increase
in accrued pensions
during 2007,
excluding any
increase for inflation1
£000
S K Green ...........
628
42
19
11,082
12,780
1,698
383
1 The transfer value represents a liability of HSBC’s pension funds and not a sum paid or due to the individual; it cannot therefore
meaningfully be added to annual remuneration.
The following unfunded pension payments, in
The options under the HSBC Holdings Savings-
respect of which provision has been made, were
made during 2007 to five former Directors of HSBC
Holdings:
B H Asher ..................................
C F W de Croisset ......................
R Delbridge ................................
Sir Brian Pearse .........................
Sir William Purves .....................
2007
£
93,812
194,077
134,934
56,269
99,310
578,402
2006
£
90,465
178,344
130,120
54,261
95,767
548,957
The payments in respect of R Delbridge and
Sir Brian Pearse were made by HSBC Bank plc as
former Directors of that bank. The payment in
respect of C F W de Croisset was made by HSBC
France as a former Director of that bank.
Share plans
(Audited)
At 31 December 2007, the undernamed Directors
held Performance Share awards and options to
acquire the number of HSBC Holdings ordinary
shares set against their respective names.
Related Share Option Plan were awarded for nil
consideration and are exercisable at a 20 per cent
discount to the average market value of the ordinary
shares on the five business days immediately
preceding the invitation date. Under the Securities
and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong the options are
categorised as ‘unlisted physically settled equity
derivatives’. No options lapsed during the year and
except as otherwise indicated, no options were
awarded or exercised during the year. There are no
performance criteria conditional upon which the
outstanding options are exercisable.
The market value of the ordinary shares at
31 December 2007 was £8.42. The highest and
lowest market values during the year were £9.64 and
£8.03. Market value is the mid-market price derived
from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official List
on the relevant date.
Under the Securities and Futures Ordinance
of Hong Kong, Performance Share awards under
The HSBC Share Plan and the HSBC Holdings
Restricted Share Plan 2000 are categorised as ‘the
interests of a beneficiary of a Trust’.
330
HSBC Holdings Savings-Related Share Option Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
(Audited)
Date of
award
Exercise
price (£)
Exercisable
from1
Exercisable
until
Options at
1 January
2007
Options
awarded
during year
Options
exercised
during year
Options at
31 December
2007
D J Flint ................. 2 May 2002
24 Apr 2007
6.3224 1 Aug 2007
7.0872 1 Aug 2012
31 Jan 2008
31 Jan 2013
S K Green .............. 23 Apr 2003
5.3496 1 Aug 2008
31 Jan 2009
2,617
–
3,070
–
2,310
–
2,6172
–
–
–
2,310
3,070
1 May be advanced to an earlier date in certain circumstances, e.g. retirement.
2 Options over 2,617 shares were exercised on 11 September 2007. At the date of exercise, the market value per share was £8.82.
The HSBC Share Plan
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
(Audited)
D J Flint ..................
M F Geoghegan ......
S K Green ...............
Date of
award
27 May 2005
6 Mar 2006
5 Mar 2007
27 May 2005
6 Mar 2006
5 Mar 2007
27 May 2005
6 Mar 2006
5 Mar 2007
Year in
which
awards
may vest
Awards at
1 January
2007
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
185,821
167,220
–
247,761
209,025
–
309,701
261,280
–
Awards
made
during
year1
–
–
246,185
–
–
559,513
–
–
419,635
Monetary
value of
awards made
during year
£000
Awards at
31 December
20072
–
–
2,200
–
–
5,000
–
–
3,750
194,796
175,296
256,029
259,728
219,121
581,884
324,659
273,900
436,413
Vesting of these Performance Share awards is subject to the performance conditions described on page 325 being satisfied.
1 At the date of the award, 5 March 2007, the market value (closing price) per share was £8.96. The Trustee of the Plan purchased the
shares at a price of £8.936358.
2 Includes additional shares arising from scrip dividends.
HSBC Holdings Restricted Share Plan 2000
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares of US$0.50
(Audited)
Date of
award
8 Mar 2002
5 Mar 2003
4 Mar 2004
8 Mar 2002
5 Mar 2003
4 Mar 2004
8 Mar 2002
5 Mar 2003
4 Mar 2004
Year in
which
awards
may vest
2007
2008
2009
2007
2008
2009
2007
2008
2009
Awards at
1 January
2007
90,176
129,917
136,357
45,089
60,630
102,268
112,720
129,917
187,490
Awards
vested
during
year1
90,8972
–
–
45,4492
–
–
113,6212
–
–
Monetary
value of
awards vested
during year
£000
Awards at
31 December
20071
830
–
–
414
–
–
1,036
–
–
–
136,192
–3
–
63,558
–3
–
136,192
–3
D J Flint .....................
M F Geoghegan .........
S K Green ..................
Vesting of these Performance Share awards is subject to the attainment of predetermined TSR targets over a three-year period from the date
of the award. Full vesting and transfer of the shares will not generally occur until the fifth anniversary of the date of award. A benchmark
for HSBC Holdings’ TSR, weighted by market capitalisation, was established which takes account of the TSR performance of: (1) a peer
group of nine banks weighted by market capitalisation which were considered most relevant to HSBC in terms of size and international
scope. For performance periods up to and including the one beginning in 2003, this group comprised ABN AMRO Holding N.V., The Bank
of East Asia, Limited, Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Lloyds TSB Group plc, Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial
Group Inc., Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited and Standard Chartered PLC. To be more relevant to HSBC in terms of size
and international scope, this peer group was amended for conditional awards made in 2004 by the replacement of Lloyds TSB Group plc,
331
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Directors’ Remuneration Report (continued)
Share plans / Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Ltd., Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group Inc. and The Bank of East Asia, Limited with Bank of
America Corporation, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, Banco Santander Central Hispano S.A. and UBS AG; (2) the five largest
banks from each of the US, the UK, continental Europe and the Far East, other than any within (1) above, weighted by market
capitalisation; and (3) the banking sector of the Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index, excluding any within (1) or (2) above,
weighted by market capitalisation. By combining the weighted average TSR for each of the above three groups and weighting that average
so that 50 per cent is applied to (1), 25 per cent is applied to (2) and 25 per cent is applied to (3), a single TSR benchmark for market
comparison was determined. The benchmark was chosen to reward the delivery of sustained financial growth of HSBC Holdings and to
align the interests of participants with those of shareholders. The extent to which each award will vest will be determined by reference to
HSBC Holdings’ TSR measured against the TSR benchmark. If HSBC Holdings’ TSR over the performance period exceeds the benchmark
TSR, awards with a value, at the date of grant, of up to 100 per cent of the individual’s earnings (base salary and bonus in respect of the
previous performance year), will vest. For higher value awards, the greater of 50 per cent of the award or the number of shares equating at
the date of grant to 100 per cent of the individual’s earnings, will vest at this level of performance. If HSBC Holdings’ TSR over the
performance period places it within the upper quartile of the ranked list of the banks comprising the benchmark, these higher value awards
will vest in full. For performance between the median and the upper quartile, vesting will be on a straight-line basis. If the upper quartile
performance level is achieved at the third anniversary of the date of award then an additional award equal to 20 per cent of the initial
Performance Share award will be made and will vest at the same time as the original award to which it relates.
Includes additional shares arising from scrip dividends.
1
2 The performance conditions have been met and the shares have vested. At the date of vesting, 8 March 2007, the market value per
share was £9.12. At the date of the award, 8 March 2002, the market value per share was £8.34.
3 The performance conditions for awards made in 2004 were not met and, under the rules of the Plan, the awards held by D J Flint
(137,447 shares), M F Geoghegan (103,086 shares) and S K Green (188,990 shares) were forfeited on 4 April 2007.
On behalf of the Board
3 March 2008
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, Chairman of Remuneration Committee
332
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and
Accounts 2007 and the Financial Statements
The following statement, which should be read in conjunction with the Auditors’ statement of their responsibilities
set out in their report on pages 334 and 335, is made with a view to distinguishing for shareholders the respective
responsibilities of the Directors and of the Auditors in relation to the financial statements.
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the consolidated financial statements of HSBC
Holdings and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) and holding company financial statements for HSBC Holdings (the
‘parent company’) in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare Group and parent company financial statements for each
financial year. The Directors are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the EU and have elected to prepare the parent company financial statements on the same basis.
The Directors are also required to present additional information for US Shareholders. Accordingly these
financial statements are framed to meet both UK and US requirements to give a consistent view to all shareholders.
The Group and parent company financial statements are required by law and IFRSs as adopted by the EU to
present fairly the financial position of the Group and the parent company and the performance for that period; the
Companies Act 1985 provides in relation to such financial statements that references in the relevant part of that Act
to financial statements giving a true and fair view are references to their achieving a fair presentation. In addition, in
order to meet certain US requirements, we are required to present our financial statements in accordance with IFRSs
as adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’). Currently, there are no differences in
application to HSBC between IFRS endorsed by the EU and IFRS issued by the IASB.
In preparing each of the Group and parent company financial statements, the Directors are required to:
•
select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• make judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and
•
state whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU.
The Directors are required to prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is not
appropriate. Since the Directors are satisfied that the Group has the resources to continue in business for the
foreseeable future, the financial statements continue to be prepared on the going concern basis.
The Directors have responsibility for ensuring that sufficient accounting records are kept that disclose with
reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the parent company and enable them to ensure that its
financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985.
The Directors have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the
assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors also have responsibility for preparing a Directors’ Report,
Directors’ Remuneration Report and the Corporate Governance statement on pages 289 to 332 that comply with that
law and those regulations.
The Directors have responsibility for the maintenance and integrity of the Annual Report and Accounts as they
appear on the company’s website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial
statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
On behalf of the Board
R G Barber, Secretary
3 March 2008
333
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Members of HSBC Holdings plc
We have audited the Group and parent company financial statements (the ‘financial statements’) of HSBC Holdings
plc for the year ended 31 December 2007 which comprise the Group Income Statement, the Group and parent
Company Balance Sheets, the Group and parent Cash Flow Statements, the Group Statement of Recognised Income
and Expense, the Company Statement of Changes in Equity and the related notes. These financial statements have
been prepared under the accounting policies set out therein. We have also audited the information in the Directors’
Remuneration Report that is described as having been audited.
This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with section 235 of the
Companies Act 1985 and, in respect of the separate opinion in relation to International Financial Reporting Standards
(‘IFRSs’) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (‘IASB’), on terms that have been agreed. Our
audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s members those matters we are required to
state to them in an auditor’s report and, in respect of the separate opinion in relation to IFRSs as issued by the IASB,
those matters that we have agreed to state to them in our report, and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company’s
members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
The directors’ responsibilities for preparing the Annual Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the financial
statements in accordance with applicable law and IFRSs as adopted by the EU are set out in the Statement of
Directors’ Responsibilities on page 333.
Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be
audited in accordance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements and International Standards on Auditing (UK
and Ireland).
We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and fair view and whether the
financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited have been properly prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS
Regulation. We also report to you whether in our opinion the information given in the Directors’ Report is consistent
with the financial statements.
In addition we report to you if, in our opinion, the company has not kept proper accounting records, if we have
not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit, or if information specified by law
regarding directors’ remuneration and other transactions is not disclosed.
We review whether the Corporate Governance Statement reflects the company’s compliance with the nine
provisions of the 2006 Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules of the Financial Services
Authority, and we report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether the board’s statements on internal
control cover all risks and controls, or form an opinion on the effectiveness of the group’s corporate governance
procedures or its risk and control procedures.
We read the other information contained in the Annual Report and Accounts 2007 and consider whether it is
consistent with the audited financial statements. We consider the implications for our report if we become aware of
any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial statements. Our responsibilities do not
extend to any other information.
Basis of audit opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) issued by the
Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited. It also
includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgments made by the directors in the preparation of the
financial statements, and of whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the group’s and company’s
circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed.
We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered
necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements
and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are free from material misstatement, whether caused
by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the
334
presentation of information in the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be
audited.
Opinion
In our opinion:
•
•
•
•
the Group financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the EU, of the
state of the Group’s affairs as at 31 December 2007 and of its profit for the year then ended;
the parent company financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the
EU as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 1985, of the state of the parent
company’s affairs as at 31 December 2007;
the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited have been properly
prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4 of
the IAS Regulation; and
the information given in the Directors’ Report is consistent with the financial statements.
Separate opinion in relation to IFRSs
As explained in Note 1a on the Group financial statements, the Group in addition to complying with its legal
obligation to comply with IFRSs as adopted by the EU, has also complied with IFRSs as issued by the IASB. In our
opinion, the Group financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRSs, of the state of the
Group’s affairs as at 31 December 2007 and of its profit for the year then ended.
KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditor
3 March 2008
335
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Statements
Page
Page
Financial Statements
Consolidated income statement .....................
Consolidated balance sheet ...........................
Consolidated statement of recognised
income and expense ...................................
Consolidated cash flow statement .................
HSBC Holdings balance sheet ......................
HSBC Holdings statement of changes in
total equity .................................................
HSBC Holdings cash flow statement ............
Notes on the Financial Statements
1 Basis of preparation ...............................
2 Summary of significant accounting
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
policies ...............................................
347
3 Net income from financial instruments
designated at fair value .......................
362
4 Gains from dilution of interests in
associates ............................................
5 Net earned insurance premiums .............
6 Net insurance claims incurred and
movement in liabilities to
policyholders ......................................
7 Net operating income .............................
8 Employee compensation and benefits ....
9 Auditors’ remuneration ..........................
10 Share-based payments ...........................
11 Tax expense ...........................................
12 Dividends ...............................................
13 Earnings per share ..................................
14 Segmental analysis .................................
By geographical region ......................
By customer group .............................
15 Analysis of financial assets and
liabilities by measurement basis .........
16 Trading assets ........................................
17 Financial assets designated at fair
362
363
364
365
365
377
378
383
386
386
387
387
391
393
397
value ...................................................
398
18 Derivatives .............................................
19 Financial investments ............................
20 Securitisations and other structured
399
403
transactions ........................................
406
21 Interests in associates and joint
ventures ..............................................
22 Goodwill and intangible assets ..............
23 Property, plant and equipment ...............
24 Investments in subsidiaries ....................
25 Other assets ............................................
26 Trading liabilities ...................................
27 Financial liabilities designated at fair
value ...................................................
28 Debt securities in issue ..........................
29 Other liabilities ......................................
30 Liabilities under insurance contracts .....
31 Provisions ..............................................
32 Subordinated liabilities ..........................
33 Fair values of financial instruments .......
34 Maturity analysis of assets and
liabilities .............................................
35 Foreign exchange exposures ..................
36 Assets charged as security for
liabilities and collateral accepted as
security for assets ...............................
37 Minority interests ...................................
38 Called up share capital ...........................
39 Equity ....................................................
40 Notes on the cash flow statement ..........
41 Contingent liabilities, contractual
commitments and guarantees .............
42 Lease commitments ...............................
43 Litigation ...............................................
44 Related party transactions ......................
45 Events after the balance sheet date ........
46 UK and Hong Kong accounting
407
409
412
414
416
417
417
418
419
419
422
422
426
433
435
436
436
437
441
444
445
447
448
449
452
requirements .......................................
452
336
Consolidated income statement for the year ended 31 December 2007
Notes
Interest income ....................................................................................
Interest expense ...................................................................................
Net interest income ..............................................................................
Fee income ...........................................................................................
Fee expense ..........................................................................................
Net fee income .....................................................................................
Trading income excluding net interest income ...................................
Net interest income on trading activities .............................................
Net trading income ..............................................................................
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ........
Gains less losses from financial investments ......................................
Gains arising from dilution of interests in associates .........................
Dividend income ..................................................................................
Net earned insurance premiums ..........................................................
Other operating income .......................................................................
3
4
5
2007
US$m
92,359
(54,564)
37,795
26,337
(4,335)
22,002
4,458
5,376
9,834
4,083
1,956
1,092
324
9,076
1,439
2006
US$m
75,879
(41,393)
34,486
21,080
(3,898)
17,182
5,619
2,603
8,222
657
969
–
340
5,668
2,546
2005
US$m
60,094
(28,760)
31,334
17,486
(3,030)
14,456
3,656
2,208
5,864
1,034
692
–
155
5,436
2,733
Total operating income .....................................................................
87,601
70,070
61,704
Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..................................................................................
6
(8,608)
(4,704)
(4,067)
Net operating income before loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions ..........................................................
Loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions .................
Net operating income ........................................................................
Employee compensation and benefits .................................................
General and administrative expenses ..................................................
Depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment ........
Amortisation and impairment of intangible assets ..............................
7
8
9
23
22
Total operating expenses ...................................................................
Operating profit .................................................................................
Share of profit in associates and joint ventures ...................................
21
Profit before tax .................................................................................
Tax expense .........................................................................................
11
Profit for the year ..............................................................................
Profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company ..................
Profit attributable to minority interests ...............................................
Basic earnings per ordinary share .......................................................
Diluted earnings per ordinary share ....................................................
Dividends per ordinary share ..............................................................
13
13
12
78,993
(17,242)
61,751
(21,334)
(15,294)
(1,714)
(700)
(39,042)
22,709
1,503
24,212
(3,757)
20,455
19,133
1,322
US$
1.65
1.63
0.87
65,366
(10,573)
54,793
(18,500)
(12,823)
(1,514)
(716)
(33,553)
21,240
846
22,086
(5,215)
16,871
15,789
1,082
US$
1.40
1.39
0.76
57,637
(7,801)
49,836
(16,145)
(11,183)
(1,632)
(554)
(29,514)
20,322
644
20,966
(5,093)
15,873
15,081
792
US$
1.36
1.35
0.69
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on
pages 183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
337
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Statements (continued)
Consolidated balance sheet at 31 December 2007
Notes
2007
US$m
ASSETS
Cash and balances at central banks ........................................................................................
Items in the course of collection from other banks ................................................................
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness ...........................................................
Trading assets .........................................................................................................................
Financial assets designated at fair value ................................................................................
Derivatives ..............................................................................................................................
Loans and advances to banks .................................................................................................
Loans and advances to customers ..........................................................................................
Financial investments .............................................................................................................
Interests in associates and joint ventures ...............................................................................
Goodwill and intangible assets ...............................................................................................
Property, plant and equipment ................................................................................................
Other assets .............................................................................................................................
Current tax asset .....................................................................................................................
Deferred tax asset ...................................................................................................................
Prepayments and accrued income ..........................................................................................
16
17
18
33
33
19
21
22
23
25
11
21,765
9,777
13,893
445,968
41,564
187,854
237,366
981,548
283,000
10,384
39,689
15,694
39,493
896
5,284
20,091
2006
US$m
12,732
14,144
13,165
328,147
20,573
103,702
185,205
868,133
204,806
8,396
37,335
16,424
29,823
380
3,241
14,552
Total assets .............................................................................................................................
2,354,266
1,860,758
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation ..............................................................................
Deposits by banks ...................................................................................................................
Customer accounts ..................................................................................................................
Items in the course of transmission to other banks ................................................................
Trading liabilities ....................................................................................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ...........................................................................
Derivatives ..............................................................................................................................
Debt securities in issue ...........................................................................................................
Retirement benefit liabilities ..................................................................................................
Other liabilities .......................................................................................................................
Current tax liability .................................................................................................................
Liabilities under insurance contracts ......................................................................................
Accruals and deferred income ................................................................................................
Provisions ................................................................................................................................
Deferred tax liability ...............................................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ...........................................................................................................
Total liabilities ........................................................................................................................
Equity
Called up share capital ............................................................................................................
Share premium account ..........................................................................................................
Other reserves .........................................................................................................................
Retained earnings ...................................................................................................................
Total shareholders’ equity ......................................................................................................
Minority interests ....................................................................................................................
Total equity .............................................................................................................................
33
33
26
27
18
28
8
29
30
31
11
32
38
39
39
39
37
13,893
132,181
1,096,140
8,672
314,580
89,939
183,393
246,579
2,893
35,013
2,559
42,606
21,766
1,958
1,859
24,819
2,218,850
5,915
8,134
33,014
81,097
128,160
7,256
135,416
13,165
99,694
896,834
12,625
226,608
70,211
101,478
230,325
5,555
28,019
1,805
17,670
16,310
1,763
1,096
22,672
1,745,830
5,786
7,789
29,380
65,397
108,352
6,576
114,928
Total equity and liabilities ......................................................................................................
2,354,266
1,860,758
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on pages
183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
S K Green, Group Chairman
338
Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense for the year ended 31 December 2007
Available-for-sale investments:
– fair value gains/(losses) taken to equity .................................................
– fair value gains transferred to income statement on disposal or
2007
US$m
756
impairment ..............................................................................................
(1,740)
Cash flow hedges:
– fair value gains/(losses) taken to equity .................................................
– fair value gains transferred to income statement ....................................
Share of changes in equity of associates and joint ventures ...........................
Exchange differences .......................................................................................
Actuarial gains/(losses) on defined benefit plans ...........................................
Tax on items taken directly to equity ..............................................................
Total income and expense taken to equity during the year .............................
Profit for the year .............................................................................................
Total recognised income and expense for the year .........................................
Effect of change in accounting policy
IFRSs transition adjustment at 1 January 20051 .........................................
Total recognised income and expense for the year attributable to:
– shareholders of the parent company .......................................................
– minority interests ....................................................................................
625
(1,886)
372
5,946
2,167
6,240
(226)
6,014
20,455
26,469
–
26,469
24,801
1,668
26,469
2006
US$m
1,582
(644)
1,554
(2,198)
20
4,675
(78)
4,911
(44)
4,867
16,871
21,738
–
21,738
20,527
1,211
21,738
2005
US$m
(400)
(240)
(92)
(106)
161
(4,257)
(812)
(5,746)
437
(5,309)
15,873
10,564
(8,824)
1,740
9,912
652
10,564
1 For an explanation of the IFRSs transition adjustment at 1 January 2005, see Note 46 on the Financial Statements in the Annual Report
and Accounts 2005.
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on pages
183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
339
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Statements (continued)
Consolidated cash flow statement for the year ended 31 December 2007
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before tax ...................................................................................
24,212
22,086
20,966
Notes
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Adjustments for:
– non-cash items included in profit before tax ...............................
– change in operating assets ............................................................
– change in operating liabilities ......................................................
– elimination of exchange differences1 ...........................................
– net gain from investing activities .................................................
– share of profits in associates and joint ventures ..........................
– dividends received from associates ..............................................
– contribution paid to defined benefit plans ...................................
– tax paid .........................................................................................
40
40
40
Net cash from operating activities .......................................................
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of financial investments .......................................................
Proceeds from the sale and maturity of financial investments ...........
Purchase of property, plant and equipment .........................................
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment ...................
Proceeds from the sale of loan portfolios ............................................
Net purchase of intangible assets ........................................................
Net cash outflow from acquisition of and increase in stake of
subsidiaries ......................................................................................
Net cash inflow from disposal of subsidiaries ....................................
Net cash outflow from acquisition of and increase in stake
of associates .....................................................................................
Net cash inflow from the consolidation of funds ................................
Proceeds from disposal of associates ..................................................
21,662
(176,538)
250,095
(18,563)
(2,209)
(1,503)
363
(1,393)
(5,088)
91,038
(260,980)
238,647
(2,720)
3,178
1,665
(950)
(623)
187
(351)
1,600
69
14,956
(175,317)
237,378
(12,114)
(2,014)
(846)
97
(547)
(4,946)
78,733
(286,316)
273,774
(2,400)
2,504
2,048
(852)
(1,185)
62
(585)
–
874
11,404
(91,753)
72,212
2,580
(692)
(644)
114
(2,547)
(4,619)
7,021
(378,103)
368,696
(2,887)
620
–
(849)
(1,662)
705
(2,569)
–
422
Net cash used in investing activities ...................................................
(20,278)
(12,076)
(15,627)
Cash flows from financing activities
Issue of ordinary share capital .............................................................
Issue of preference shares ....................................................................
Net purchases and sales of own shares for market-making and
investment purposes ........................................................................
Purchases of own shares to meet share awards and share
option awards ..................................................................................
On exercise of share options ...............................................................
Subordinated loan capital issued .........................................................
Subordinated loan capital repaid .........................................................
Dividends paid to shareholders of the parent company ......................
Dividends paid to minority interests ...................................................
Net cash used in financing activities ...................................................
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ....................
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January ..............................................
Exchange differences in respect of cash and cash equivalents ...........
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December ........................................
40
474
–
126
(636)
104
5,705
(689)
(6,003)
(718)
(1,637)
69,123
215,486
12,400
297,009
1,010
374
46
(575)
173
5,948
(903)
(5,927)
(710)
(564)
66,093
141,307
8,086
215,486
690
1,298
(55)
(766)
277
2,093
(1,121)
(5,935)
(508)
(4,027)
(12,633)
160,956
(7,016)
141,307
1 Adjustment to bring changes between opening and closing balance sheet amounts to average rates. This is not done on a line-by-line
basis, as details cannot be determined without unreasonable expense.
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on pages
183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
340
HSBC Holdings balance sheet at 31 December 2007
Notes
2007
US$m
2006
(restated)
US$m
ASSETS
Cash at bank and in hand:
– balances with HSBC undertakings .................................................................................
Derivatives ..............................................................................................................................
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings ..........................................................................
Financial investments .............................................................................................................
Investments in subsidiaries1 ...................................................................................................
Property, plant and equipment ................................................................................................
Other assets .............................................................................................................................
Current tax assets ....................................................................................................................
Deferred tax asset ...................................................................................................................
Prepayments and accrued income ..........................................................................................
Total assets .............................................................................................................................
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ..................................................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ...........................................................................
Derivatives ..............................................................................................................................
Other liabilities .......................................................................................................................
Current tax liabilities ..............................................................................................................
Accruals and deferred income ................................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ...........................................................................................................
Total liabilities ........................................................................................................................
Equity
Called up share capital ............................................................................................................
Share premium account ..........................................................................................................
Merger reserve and other reserves .........................................................................................
Other reserves .........................................................................................................................
Retained earnings ...................................................................................................................
Total equity .............................................................................................................................
Total equity and liabilities ......................................................................................................
18
33
24
11
33
27
18
29
32
38
360
2,660
17,242
3,022
69,411
1
21
–
7
224
92,948
2,969
18,683
44
1,405
322
150
8,544
32,117
5,915
8,134
28,942
3,631
14,209
60,831
92,948
729
1,599
14,456
3,614
63,265
1
25
31
35
41
83,796
3,100
14,070
177
1,517
–
111
8,423
27,398
5,786
7,789
28,942
3,293
10,588
56,398
83,796
1 On 1 January 2007, HSBC Holdings adopted IFRIC 11. Comparative information has been restated accordingly. See Note 1a.
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on pages
183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
S K Green, Group Chairman
341
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Financial Statements (continued)
HSBC Holdings statement of changes in total equity for the year ended 31 December 2007
Called up share capital
At 1 January ..................................................................................................................................
Shares issued in connection with the early settlement of HSBC Finance 8.875 per cent
Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units .................................................................
Shares issued under employee share plans ...................................................................................
Shares issued in lieu of dividends .................................................................................................
At 31 December ............................................................................................................................
Share premium account
At 1 January ..................................................................................................................................
Shares issued under employee share plans ...................................................................................
Shares issued in lieu of dividends and amounts arising thereon ..................................................
At 31 December ............................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
5,786
–
17
112
5,915
7,789
460
(115)
8,134
2006
(restated)
US$m
5,667
2
38
79
5,786
6,896
975
(82)
7,789
Merger reserve and other reserves
At 1 January and 31 December .....................................................................................................
28,942
28,942
Other reserves
Available-for-sale fair value reserve
At 1 January ..................................................................................................................................
Fair value changes taken to equity1 ...............................................................................................
Tax on items taken directly to equity1 ..........................................................................................
At 31 December ............................................................................................................................
Share-based payment reserve2
At 1 January ..................................................................................................................................
Exercise and lapse of share options and vesting of share awards .................................................
Cost of share-based payment arrangements ..................................................................................
Equity investments granted to employees of subsidiaries under employee share plans ...............
Other movements ..........................................................................................................................
At 31 December ............................................................................................................................
Other paid-in capital
At 1 January ..................................................................................................................................
Exercise and lapse of share options ..............................................................................................
At 31 December ............................................................................................................................
Total other reserves at 31 December .................................................................................................
Retained earnings
At 1 January ..................................................................................................................................
Profit for the year attributable to shareholders .............................................................................
Dividends to shareholders of the parent company ........................................................................
Amounts arising on shares in lieu of dividends ............................................................................
Own shares adjustments ................................................................................................................
Tax on share based payments ........................................................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements1 ...............................................................................
At 31 December3 ...........................................................................................................................
246
246
(10)
482
2,111
(751)
29
818
(239)
1,968
936
245
1,181
3,631
10,588
9,499
(10,241)
4,354
16
(7)
–
14,209
337
(121)
30
246
1,535
(623)
58
1,143
(2)
2,111
650
286
936
3,293
9,501
7,139
(8,769)
2,528
157
9
23
10,588
1 The total net income/(expense) taken directly to equity during the year was US$229 million (2006: US$(59) million).
2 On 1 January 2007, HSBC Holdings adopted IFRIC 11. Comparative information has been restated accordingly. See Note 1a.
3 Retained earnings include 30,706,713 (US$554 million) of own shares held to fund employee share plans (2006: 35,639,856,
US$544 million).
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on pages
183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
342
HSBC Holdings cash flow statement for the year ended 31 December 2007
Cash flows from operating activities
Profit before tax ......................................................................................................................
9,598
6,974
Notes
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
Adjustments for:
– non-cash items included in profit before tax ..................................................................
– change in operating assets ...............................................................................................
– change in operating liabilities .........................................................................................
– elimination of exchange differences1 ..............................................................................
– net gain from investing activities ....................................................................................
– tax received .....................................................................................................................
40
40
40
Net cash from operating activities ..........................................................................................
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash outflow from acquisition of and increase in stake of subsidiaries ..........................
Net cash used in investing activities ......................................................................................
Cash flows from financing activities
Issue of ordinary share capital ................................................................................................
Purchases of own shares to meet share awards and share option awards ..............................
On exercise of share options ..................................................................................................
Subordinated loan capital issued ............................................................................................
Dividends paid ........................................................................................................................
Net cash used in financing activities ......................................................................................
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents .......................................................
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January .................................................................................
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December ............................................................................
40
10
(4,059)
179
(26)
(12)
268
5,958
(5,133)
(5,133)
474
(96)
72
4,359
(6,003)
(1,194)
(369)
729
360
58
(1,827)
1,056
(29)
(8)
219
6,443
(4,440)
(4,440)
1,010
(46)
127
2,806
(5,927)
(2,030)
(27)
756
729
1 Adjustment to bring changes between opening and closing balance sheet amounts to average rates. This is not done on a line-by-line
basis, as details cannot be determined without unreasonable expense.
The accompanying notes on pages 344 to 452, the audited sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages
192 to 288, ‘Critical accounting policies’ on pages 132 to 134 and ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ on pages
183 to 191 form an integral part of these financial statements.
343
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements
Note 1
1 Basis of preparation
(a) Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
The consolidated financial statements of HSBC and the separate financial statements of HSBC Holdings have
been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRSs’) as endorsed by the EU.
EU-endorsed IFRSs may differ from IFRSs as published by the International Accounting Standards Board
(‘IASB’) if, at any point in time, new or amended IFRSs have not been endorsed by the EU. At 31 December
2007, there were no unendorsed standards effective for the year ended 31 December 2007 affecting these
consolidated and separate financial statements, and there was no difference between IFRSs endorsed by the EU
and IFRSs issued by the IASB in terms of their application to HSBC. Accordingly, HSBC’s financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2007 are prepared in accordance with IFRSs as issued by the IASB.
IFRSs comprise accounting standards issued by the IASB and its predecessor body and interpretations issued by
the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (‘IFRIC’) and its predecessor body.
On 1 January 2007, HSBC adopted the following IFRIC interpretations:
•
•
IFRIC 10 ‘Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment’, which had no significant effect on the consolidated
financial statements of HSBC Holdings; and
IFRIC 11 ‘Group and Treasury Share Transactions’ (‘IFRIC 11’). On application of this interpretation,
HSBC Holdings recognises all share-based payment transactions as equity-settled in its separate financial
statements. The adoption of IFRIC 11 had no effect on the consolidated financial statements of HSBC.
However, in the separate financial statements of HSBC Holdings, the effect was to increase both
‘Investments in subsidiaries’ and ‘Share-based payment reserve’ by US$909 million in 2006. This change in
accounting policy was made in accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRIC 11, which state that
IFRIC 11 shall be applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in
Accounting Estimates and Errors’, subject to the transitional provisions of IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payment’.
(b) Differences between IFRSs and Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards
As stated in Note 46, there are no significant differences between IFRSs and Hong Kong Financial Reporting
Standards. The Notes on the Financial Statements, taken together with the Report of the Directors, include the
aggregate of all disclosures necessary to satisfy IFRSs and Hong Kong reporting requirements.
(c) Presentation of information
Disclosures under IFRS 4 and IFRS 7 relating to the nature and extent of risks have been included in the audited
sections of the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on pages 192 to 288.
Capital disclosures under IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’ have been included in the audited
sections of ‘Capital management and allocation’ on pages 282 to 288.
Disclosures relating to ‘Off-balance sheet arrangements and special purpose entities’ are set out below on pages
183 to 191 and are also audited.
In publishing the parent company financial statements here together with the Group financial statements, HSBC
Holdings has taken advantage of the exemption in section 230 of the Companies Act 1985 not to present its
individual income statement and related notes that form a part of these financial statements.
HSBC has taken advantage of the exemption under Regulation 7 of the Partnerships and Unlimited Companies
(Accounts) Regulations 1993 from certain partnerships that are consolidated by HSBC presenting their own
individual financial statements under IFRSs.
The functional currency of HSBC Holdings plc is the US dollar, which is also the presentational currency of the
consolidated financial statements of HSBC.
(d) Comparative information
As required by US public company reporting requirements, these consolidated financial statements include two
years of comparative information for the consolidated income statement, consolidated cash flow statement,
consolidated statement of recognised income and expense and related notes on the financial statements.
344
(e) Use of estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial information requires the use of estimates and assumptions about future conditions.
Use of available information and application of judgement are inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual
results in the future may differ from those reported. In this regard, management believes that the critical
accounting policies where judgement is necessarily applied are those which relate to loan impairment, goodwill
impairment and the valuation of financial instruments (see ‘Critical Accounting Policies’ on pages 132 to
134 which form an integral part of these financial statements).
Further information about key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation
uncertainty, are set out in these notes on the financial statements.
(f) Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of HSBC comprise the financial statements of HSBC Holdings and its
subsidiaries made up to 31 December, with the exception of the banking and insurance subsidiaries of HSBC
Bank Argentina, whose financial statements are made up to 30 June annually to comply with local regulations.
Accordingly, HSBC uses their audited interim financial statements, drawn up to 31 December annually.
Newly acquired subsidiaries are consolidated from the date that HSBC gains control. The purchase method of
accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by HSBC. The cost of an acquisition is measured
at the fair value of the consideration given at the date of exchange, together with costs directly attributable to that
acquisition. The acquired identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities are measured at their fair values
at the date of acquisition. Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of HSBC’s share of the
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition
is less than the fair value of HSBC’s share of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the
business acquired, the difference is recognised immediately in the income statement.
Entities that are controlled by HSBC are consolidated until the date that control ceases.
In the context of Special Purpose Entities (‘SPEs’), the following circumstances may indicate a relationship in
which, in substance, HSBC controls and, consequently, consolidates an SPE:
•
the activities of the SPE are being conducted on behalf of HSBC according to its specific business needs so
that HSBC obtains benefits from the SPE’s operation;
• HSBC has the decision-making powers to obtain the majority of the benefits of the activities of the SPE or,
by setting up an ‘autopilot’ mechanism, HSBC has delegated these decision-making powers;
• HSBC has rights to obtain the majority of the benefits of the SPE and therefore may be exposed to risks
incident to the activities of the SPE; or
• HSBC retains the majority of the residual or ownership risks related to the SPE or its assets in order to
obtain benefits from its activities.
HSBC performs a re-assessment of consolidation whenever there is a change in the substance of the relationship
between HSBC and an SPE.
All intra-HSBC transactions are eliminated on consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements of HSBC also include the attributable share of the results and reserves of
joint ventures and associates. These are based on financial statements made up to 31 December, with the
exception of the Bank of Communications, Ping An Insurance and Industrial Bank which are included on the
basis of financial statements made up for the twelve months to 30 September. These are equity accounted three
months in arrears in order to meet the requirements of the Group’s reporting timetable. HSBC has taken into
account changes in the period from 1 October to 31 December that would have materially affected its results.
(g) Future accounting developments
Standards and Interpretations issued by the IASB and endorsed by the EU
IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ (‘IFRS 8’), which replaces IAS 14 ‘Segment Reporting’ (‘IAS 14’), was issued on
30 November 2006 and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. This standard
specifies how an entity should report information about its operating segments, based on information about the
345
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 1 and 2
components of the entity that the chief operating decision maker uses to make operating decisions. HSBC
currently presents two sets of segments in accordance with IAS 14, one geographical and one based on customer
groups, which reflect the way the businesses of the Group are managed. HSBC expects to adopt IFRS 8 with
effect from 1 January 2009, and will accordingly present segmental information which reflects the operating
segments used to make operating decisions at that time.
Standards and Interpretations issued by the IASB but not endorsed by the EU
The IASB issued a revised IAS 23 ‘Borrowing Costs’ on 29 March 2007, which is applicable for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2009. The revised standard eliminates the option of recognising borrowing costs
immediately as an expense, to the extent that they are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or
production of a qualifying asset. HSBC does not expect adoption of the revised standard to have a significant
effect on the consolidated financial statements.
IFRIC 12 ‘Service Concession Arrangements’ (‘IFRIC 12’) was issued on 30 November 2006 and is effective
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2008. IFRIC 12 provides guidance on service concession
arrangements by which a government or other public sector entity grants contracts for the supply of public
services to private sector operators. IFRIC 12 addresses how service concession operators should apply existing
IFRSs to account for the obligations they undertake and the rights they receive in service concession
arrangements. IFRIC 12 is unlikely to have a significant effect on HSBC.
IFRIC 13 ‘Customer Loyalty Programmes’ (‘IFRIC 13’) was issued on 28 June 2007 and is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2008. IFRIC 13 addresses how companies that grant their customers loyalty
award credits (often called ‘points’) when buying goods or services should account for their obligation to
provide free or discounted goods and services, if and when the customers redeem the points. IFRIC 13 requires
companies to allocate some of the proceeds of the initial sale to the award credits and recognise these proceeds
as revenue only when they have fulfilled their obligations to provide goods or services. HSBC is currently
assessing the effect of this interpretation on the consolidated financial statements.
IFRIC 14 ‘IAS 19 – The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their
Interaction’ (‘IFRIC 14’) was issued on 5 July 2007 and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after
1 January 2008. IFRIC 14 provides guidance regarding the circumstances under which refunds and future
reductions in contributions from a defined benefit plan can be regarded as available to an entity for the purpose
of recognising a net defined benefit asset. Additionally, in jurisdictions where there is both a minimum funding
requirement and restrictions over the amounts that companies can recover from the plan, either as refunds or
reductions in contributions, additional liabilities may need to be recognised. HSBC is currently assessing the
effect of this interpretation on the consolidated financial statements.
A revised IAS 1 ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’, which is applicable for annual periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2009, was issued on 6 September 2007. The revised standard aims to improve users’ ability to
analyse and compare information given in financial statements. Adoption of the revised standard will have no
effect on the results reported in HSBC’s consolidated financial statements but will change the presentation of the
results and financial position of HSBC in certain respects.
The IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payment’ on 17 January 2008. The amendment, which
is applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009, clarifies that vesting conditions comprise
only service conditions and performance conditions. It also specifies the accounting treatment for a failure to
meet a non-vesting condition. Adoption of the amendment is unlikely to have a significant effect on HSBC’s
consolidated financial statements.
A revised IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’ and an amended IAS 27 ‘Consolidated and Separate Financial
Statements’, were issued on 10 January 2008. The revisions to the standards apply prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual financial reporting
period beginning on or after 1 July 2009. The main changes under the standards are that:
•
•
acquisition-related costs are recognised as expenses in the income statement in the period they are incurred;
equity interests held prior to control being obtained are remeasured to fair value at the time control is
obtained, and any gain or loss is recognised in the income statement;
346
•
changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a change of control are treated
as transactions between equity holders and reported in equity; and
• An option is available, on a transaction-by-transaction basis, to measure any non-controlling interests
(previously referred to as minority interests) in the entity acquired either at fair value, or at the non-
controlling interest’s proportionate share of the net identifiable assets of the entity acquired.
The effect that the changes will have on the results and financial position of HSBC will depend on the incidence
and timing of business combinations occurring on or after 1 January 2010.
The IASB issued amendments to IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments: Presentation’ and IAS 1 ‘Presentation
of Financial Statements’, – ‘Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on Liquidation’, on
14 February 2008. The amendments are applicable for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009.
HSBC is currently assessing the effect of the amendments, if any, on the consolidated financial statements.
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(a) Interest income and expense
Interest income and expense for all financial instruments except for those classified as held for trading or
designated at fair value (other than debt securities issued by HSBC and derivatives managed in conjunction with
such debt securities issued) are recognised in ‘Interest income’ and ‘Interest expense’ in the income statement
using the effective interest method. The effective interest method is a way of calculating the amortised cost of a
financial asset or a financial liability (or groups of financial assets or financial liabilities) and of allocating the
interest income or interest expense over the relevant period.
The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts or payments through
the expected life of the financial instrument or, where appropriate, a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of
the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest rate, HSBC estimates cash flows
considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument but not future credit losses. The calculation includes
all amounts paid or received by HSBC that are an integral part of the effective interest rate of a financial
instrument, including transaction costs and all other premiums or discounts.
Interest on impaired financial assets is calculated by applying the original effective interest rate of the financial
asset to the carrying amount as reduced by any allowance for impairment.
(b) Non-interest income
HSBC earns fee income from a diverse range of services provided to its customers. Fee income is accounted for
as follows:
−
−
−
income earned on the execution of a significant act is recognised as revenue when the act is completed (for
example, fees arising from negotiating, or participating in the negotiation of, a transaction for a third party,
such as the arrangement for the acquisition of shares or other securities);
income earned from the provision of services is recognised as revenue as the services are provided (for
example, asset management, portfolio and other management advisory and service fees); and
income which forms an integral part of the effective interest rate of a financial instrument is recognised as
an adjustment to the effective interest rate (for example, certain loan commitment fees) and recorded in
‘Interest income’ (Note 2a).
Net trading income comprises all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities held for trading, together with related interest income, expense and dividends.
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value includes all gains and losses from changes in
the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss. Interest
income and expense and dividend income arising on these financial instruments are also included, except for
debt securities issued and derivatives managed in conjunction with debt securities issued. Interest on these
instruments is presented in ‘Interest expense’.
Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established. This is the ex-dividend date for
equity securities.
347
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
(c) Segment reporting
HSBC is organised into five geographical regions, Europe, Hong Kong, Rest of Asia-Pacific, North America and
Latin America, and manages its business through four customer groups: Personal Financial Services;
Commercial Banking; Global Banking and Markets; and Private Banking. The main items reported in the
‘Other’ segment are the income and expenses of wholesale insurance operations, certain property activities,
unallocated investment activities including hsbc.com, centrally held investment companies and HSBC’s holding
company and financing operations. Segment income and expenses include transfers between geographical
regions and transfers between customer groups. These transfers are conducted on arm’s length terms and
conditions.
In HSBC’s segmental analysis of the income statement by customer groups and global businesses, net trading
income comprises all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities
classified as held for trading, together with third party and intra-segment interest income and interest expense,
and dividends received; in the consolidated income statement, intra-segment interest income and expense are
eliminated.
(d) Determination of fair value
All financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value. In the normal course of business, the fair value of
a financial instrument on initial recognition is the transaction price (that is, the fair value of the consideration
given or received). In certain circumstances, however, the fair value will be based on other observable current
market transactions in the same instrument, without modification or repackaging, or on a valuation technique
whose variables include only data from observable markets, such as interest rate yield curves, option volatilities
and currency rates. When such evidence exists, HSBC recognises a trading gain or loss on inception of the
financial instrument. When unobservable market data have a significant impact on the valuation of financial
instruments, the entire initial difference in fair value indicated by the valuation model from the transaction price
is not recognised immediately in the income statement but is recognised over the life of the transaction on an
appropriate basis, or when the inputs become observable, or the transaction matures or is closed out, or when
HSBC enters into an offsetting transaction.
Subsequent to initial recognition, the fair values of financial instruments measured at fair value that are quoted in
active markets are based on bid prices for assets held and offer prices for liabilities issued. When independent
prices are not available, fair values are determined by using valuation techniques which refer to observable
market data. These include comparison with similar instruments where market observable prices exist,
discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models and other valuation techniques commonly used by market
participants. For financial instruments, fair values may be determined in whole or in part using valuation
techniques based on assumptions that are not supported by prices from current market transactions or observable
market data.
Factors such as bid-offer spread, credit profile and model uncertainty are taken into account, as appropriate,
when fair values are calculated using valuation techniques. Valuation techniques incorporate assumptions that
other market participants would use in their valuations, including assumptions about interest rate yield curves,
exchange rates, volatilities, and prepayment and default rates. Where a portfolio of financial instruments has
quoted prices in an active market, the fair value of the instruments are calculated as the product of the number of
units and quoted price and no block discounts are made.
If the fair value of a financial asset measured at fair value becomes negative, it is recorded as a financial liability
until its fair value becomes positive, at which time it is recorded as a financial asset.
The fair values of financial liabilities are measured using quoted market prices where available, or using
valuation techniques. These fair values include market participants’ assessments of the appropriate credit spread
to apply to HSBC’s liabilities. The amount of change during the period, and cumulatively, in the fair value of
designated financial liabilities and loans and advances that is attributable to changes in their credit spread is
determined as the amount of change in the fair value that is not attributable to changes in market conditions that
give rise to market risk.
348
(e) Loans and advances to banks and customers
Loans and advances to banks and customers include loans and advances originated by HSBC which are not
classified either as held for trading or designated at fair value. Loans and advances are recognised when cash is
advanced to borrowers. They are derecognised when either borrowers repay their obligations, or the loans are
sold or written off, or substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred. They are initially
recorded at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs and are subsequently measured at amortised
cost using the effective interest method, less impairment losses. Where loans and advances are hedged by
derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, the carrying value of the loans and advances so
hedged includes a fair value adjustment for the hedged risk only.
For certain leveraged finance and syndicated lending activities, HSBC may commit to underwrite loans on fixed
contractual terms for specified periods of time, where the drawdown of the loan is contingent upon certain future
events outside the control of HSBC. Where the loan arising from the lending commitment is expected to be held
for trading, the commitment to lend is recorded as a trading derivative. Where it is not HSBC’s intention to trade
the loan, a provision is only recorded where it is probable that HSBC will incur a loss as a result of the loan
commitment. This may occur, for example, where a loss of principal is probable or the interest rate charged on
the loan is lower than the cost of funding. On inception of the loan, the hold portion is recorded at its fair value.
Where this fair value is lower than the cash amount advanced (for example, due to the rate of interest charged on
the loan being below the market rate of interest), the write down is charged to the income statement. The write
down will be recovered over the life of the loan, through the recognition of interest income using the effective
interest rate method, unless the loan is impaired. The write down is recorded as a reduction to other operating
income.
(f) Impairment of loans and advances
Losses for impaired loans are recognised promptly when there is objective evidence that impairment of a loan or
portfolio of loans has occurred. Impairment allowances are calculated on individual loans and on groups of loans
assessed collectively. Impairment losses are recorded as charges to the income statement. The carrying amount
of impaired loans on the balance sheet is reduced through the use of impairment allowance accounts. Losses
expected from future events are not recognised.
Individually assessed loans and advances
For all loans that are considered individually significant, HSBC assesses on a case-by-case basis at each balance
sheet date whether there is any objective evidence that a loan is impaired. For those loans where objective
evidence of impairment exists, impairment losses are determined considering the following factors:
– HSBC’s aggregate exposure to the customer;
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
the viability of the customer’s business model and their capacity to trade successfully out of financial
difficulties and generate sufficient cash flow to service debt obligations;
the amount and timing of expected receipts and recoveries;
the likely dividend available on liquidation or bankruptcy;
the extent of other creditors’ commitments ranking ahead of, or pari passu with, HSBC and the likelihood of
other creditors continuing to support the company;
the complexity of determining the aggregate amount and ranking of all creditor claims and the extent to
which legal and insurance uncertainties are evident;
the realisable value of security (or other credit mitigants) and likelihood of successful repossession;
the likely deduction of any costs involved in recovery of amounts outstanding;
the ability of the borrower to obtain, and make payments in, the currency of the loan if not denominated in
local currency; and
– when available, the secondary market price of the debt.
Impairment losses are calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows of a loan at its original effective
interest rate, and comparing the resultant present value with the loan’s current carrying amount.
349
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
Collectively assessed loans and advances
Impairment is assessed on a collective basis in two circumstances:
–
to cover losses which have been incurred but have not yet been identified on loans subject to individual
assessment; and
–
for homogeneous groups of loans that are not considered individually significant.
Incurred but not yet identified impairment
Individually assessed loans for which no evidence of loss has been specifically identified on an individual basis
are grouped together according to their credit risk characteristics for the purpose of calculating an estimated
collective loss. This reflects impairment losses that HSBC has incurred as a result of events occurring before
the balance sheet date, which HSBC is not able to identify on an individual loan basis, and that can be reliably
estimated. These losses will only be individually identified in the future. As soon as information becomes
available which identified losses on individual loans within the group, those loans are removed from the group
and assessed on an individual basis for impairment.
The collective impairment allowance is determined after taking into account:
–
–
historical loss experience in portfolios of similar credit risk characteristics (for example, by industry sector,
loan grade or product);
the estimated period between impairment occurring and the loss being identified and evidenced by the
establishment of an appropriate allowance against the individual loan; and
– management’s experienced judgement as to whether current economic and credit conditions are such that
the actual level of inherent losses at the balance sheet date is likely to be greater or less than that suggested
by historical experience.
The period between a loss occurring and its identification is estimated by local management for each identified
portfolio.
Homogeneous groups of loans and advances
Statistical methods are used to determine impairment losses on a collective basis for homogeneous groups of
loans that are not considered individually significant, because individual loan assessment is impracticable.
Losses in these groups of loans are recorded on an individual basis when individual loans are written off, at
which point they are removed from the group. Two alternative methods are used to calculate allowances on a
collective basis:
− When appropriate empirical information is available, HSBC utilises roll rate methodology. This
methodology employs statistical analyses of historical data and experience of delinquency and default to
estimate the amount of loans that will eventually be written off as a result of the events occurring before the
balance sheet date which HSBC is not able to identify on an individual loan basis, and that can be reliably
estimated. Under this methodology, loans are grouped into ranges according to the number of days past due,
and statistical analysis is used to estimate the likelihood that loans in each range will progress through the
various stages of delinquency and ultimately prove irrecoverable. The estimated loss is the difference
between the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate of
the portfolio, and the carrying amount of the portfolio. Current economic conditions are also evaluated when
calculating the appropriate level of allowance required to cover inherent loss. In certain highly developed
markets, sophisticated models also take into account behavioural and account management trends as
revealed in, for example, bankruptcy and rescheduling statistics.
−
In other cases, when the portfolio size is small or when information is insufficient or not reliable enough to
adopt a roll rate methodology, HSBC adopts a formulaic approach which allocates progressively higher
percentage loss rates the longer a customer’s loan is overdue. Loss rates are based on historical experience.
In normal circumstances, historical experience provides the most objective and relevant information from which
to assess inherent loss within each portfolio. In certain circumstances, historical loss experience provides less
relevant information about the inherent loss in a given portfolio at the balance sheet date, for example, where
350
there have been changes in economic, regulatory or behavioural conditions, such that the most recent trends in
the portfolio risk factors are not fully reflected in the statistical models.
These additional portfolio risk factors may include recent loan portfolio growth and product mix, unemployment
rates, bankruptcy trends, geographic concentrations, loan product features (such as the ability of borrowers to
repay adjustable-rate loans where reset interest rates give rise to increases in interest charges), economic
conditions such as national and local trends in housing markets and interest rates, portfolio seasoning, account
management policies and practices, current levels of write-offs, changes in laws and regulations and other items
which can affect customer payment patterns on outstanding loans, such as natural disasters. These risk factors,
where relevant, are taken into account when calculating the appropriate level of impairment allowances by
adjusting the impairment allowances derived solely from historical loss experience.
Roll rates, loss rates and the expected timing of future recoveries are regularly benchmarked against actual
outcomes to ensure they remain appropriate.
Write-off of loans and advances
A loan (and the related impairment allowance account) is normally written off, either partially or in full, when
there is no realistic prospect of recovery of the principal amount and, for a collateralised loan, when the proceeds
from realising the security have been received.
Reversals of impairment
If the amount of an impairment loss decreases in a subsequent period, and the decrease can be related objectively
to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the excess is written back by reducing the loan
impairment allowance account accordingly. The write back is recognised in the income statement.
Assets acquired in exchange for loans
Non-financial assets acquired in exchange for loans as part of an orderly realisation are recorded as assets held
for sale and reported in ‘Other assets’. The asset acquired is recorded at the lower of its fair value (less costs to
sell) and the carrying amount of the loan (net of impairment allowance) at the date of exchange. No depreciation
is charged in respect of assets held for sale. Any subsequent write-down of the acquired asset to fair value less
costs to sell is recognised in the income statement, in ‘Other operating income’. Any subsequent increase in the
fair value less costs to sell, to the extent this does not exceed the cumulative write down, is also recognised in
‘Other operating income’, together with any realised gains or losses on disposal.
Renegotiated loans
Loans subject to collective impairment assessment whose terms have been renegotiated are no longer considered
past due, but are treated as new loans for measurement purposes once the minimum number of payments
required under the new arrangements have been received. Loans subject to individual impairment assessment,
whose terms have been renegotiated, are subject to ongoing review to determine whether they remain impaired
or should be considered past due. The carrying amount of loans that have been classified as renegotiated retain
this classification until maturity or derecognition.
(g) Trading assets and trading liabilities
Treasury bills, debt securities, equity shares, loans, deposits, debt securities in issue, and short positions in
securities are classified as held for trading if they have been acquired principally for the purpose of selling or
repurchasing in the near term, or they form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are
managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent pattern of short-term profit-taking. These financial
assets or financial liabilities are recognised on trade date, when HSBC enters into contractual arrangements with
counterparties to purchase or sell securities, and are normally derecognised when either sold (assets) or
extinguished (liabilities). Measurement is initially at fair value, with transaction costs taken to the income
statement. Subsequently, their fair values are remeasured, and all gains and losses from changes therein are
recognised in the income statement in ‘Net trading income’ as they arise.
351
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
(h) Financial instruments designated at fair value
Financial instruments, other than those held for trading, are classified in this category if they meet one or more of
the criteria set out below, and are so designated by management. HSBC may designate financial instruments at
fair value when the designation:
–
eliminates or significantly reduces valuation or recognition inconsistencies that would otherwise arise from
measuring financial assets or financial liabilities, or recognising gains and losses on them, on different
bases. Under this criterion, the main classes of financial instruments designated by HSBC are:
Long-term debt issues. The interest payable on certain fixed rate long-term debt securities issued has been
matched with the interest on ‘receive fixed/pay variable’ interest rate swaps as part of a documented interest
rate risk management strategy. An accounting mismatch would arise if the debt securities issued were
accounted for at amortised cost, because the related derivatives are measured at fair value with changes in
the fair value recognised in the income statement. By designating the long-term debt at fair value, the
movement in the fair value of the long-term debt will also be recognised in the income statement.
Financial assets and financial liabilities under investment contracts. Liabilities to customers under
linked contracts are determined based on the fair value of the assets held in the linked funds, with changes
recognised in the income statement. If no designation was made for the assets relating to the customer
liabilities they would be classified as available-for-sale and the changes in fair value would be recorded
directly in equity. These financial instruments are managed on a fair value basis and management
information is also prepared on this basis.
Designation at fair value of the financial assets and liabilities under investment contracts allows the changes
in fair values to be recorded in the income statement and presented in the same line.
–
applies to groups of financial assets, financial liabilities or combinations thereof that are managed, and their
performance evaluated, on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or
investment strategy, and where information about the groups of financial instruments is reported to
management on that basis. Under this criterion, certain financial assets held to meet liabilities under
insurance contracts are the main class of financial instrument so designated. HSBC has documented risk
management and investment strategies designed to manage such assets at fair value, taking into
consideration the relationship of assets to liabilities in a way that mitigates market risks. Reports are
provided to management on the fair value of the assets. Fair value measurement is also consistent with the
regulatory reporting requirements under the appropriate regulations for these insurance operations.
–
relates to financial instruments containing one or more embedded derivatives that significantly modify the
cash flows resulting from those financial instruments, including certain debt issues and debt securities held.
The fair value designation, once made, is irrevocable. Designated financial assets and financial liabilities are
recognised when HSBC enters into the contractual provisions of the arrangements with counterparties, which is
generally on trade date, and are normally derecognised when sold (assets) or extinguished (liabilities).
Measurement is initially at fair value, with transaction costs taken directly to the income statement.
Subsequently, the fair values are remeasured, and gains and losses from changes therein are recognised in ‘Net
income from financial instruments designated at fair value’.
(i) Financial investments
Treasury bills, debt securities and equity shares intended to be held on a continuing basis, other than those
designated at fair value (Note 2h), are classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Financial investments
are recognised on trade date, when HSBC enters into contractual arrangements with counterparties to purchase
securities, and are normally derecognised when either the securities are sold or the borrowers repay their
obligations.
(i) Available-for-sale securities are initially measured at fair value plus direct and incremental transaction costs.
They are subsequently remeasured at fair value, and changes therein are recognised in equity in the
‘Available-for-sale reserve’ (Note 39) until the securities are either sold or impaired. When available-for-
sale securities are sold, cumulative gains or losses previously recognised in equity are recognised in the
income statement as ‘Gains less losses from financial investments’.
352
Interest income is recognised on available-for-sale securities using the effective interest rate method,
calculated over the asset’s expected life. Premiums and/or discounts arising on the purchase of dated
investment securities are included in the calculation of their effective interest rates. Dividends are
recognised in the income statement when the right to receive payment has been established.
At each balance sheet date an assessment is made of whether there is any objective evidence of impairment
in the value of a financial asset or group of assets. This usually arises when circumstances are such that an
adverse effect on future cash flows from the asset or group of assets can be reliably estimated. If an
available-for-sale security is impaired, the cumulative loss (measured as the difference between the asset’s
acquisition cost (net of any principal repayments and amortisation) and its current fair value, less any
impairment loss on that asset previously recognised in the income statement) is removed from equity and
recognised in the income statement. Reversals of impairment losses are subject to contrasting treatments
depending on the nature of the instrument concerned:
–
–
if the fair value of a debt instrument classified as available-for-sale increases in a subsequent period,
and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was
recognised in the income statement, the impairment loss is reversed through the income statement;
impairment losses recognised in the income statement on equity instruments are not reversed through
the income statement.
(ii) Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and
fixed maturities that HSBC positively intends, and is able, to hold until maturity. Held-to-maturity
investments are initially recorded at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs, and are
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment
losses.
(j) Sale and repurchase agreements (including stock lending and borrowing)
When securities are sold subject to a commitment to repurchase them at a predetermined price (‘repos’), they
remain on the balance sheet and a liability is recorded in respect of the consideration received. Securities
purchased under commitments to sell (‘reverse repos’) are not recognised on the balance sheet and the
consideration paid is recorded in ‘Loans and advances to banks’ or ‘Loans and advances to customers’ as
appropriate. The difference between the sale and repurchase price is treated as interest and recognised over the
life of the agreement.
Securities lending and borrowing transactions are generally secured, with collateral taking the form of securities
or cash advanced or received. The transfer of securities to counterparties under these agreements is not normally
reflected on the balance sheet. Cash collateral advanced or received is recorded as an asset or a liability
respectively.
Securities borrowed are not recognised on the balance sheet. If they are sold on to third parties, an obligation to
return the securities is recorded as a trading liability and measured at fair value, and any gains or losses are
included in ‘Net trading income’.
(k) Derivatives and hedge accounting
Derivatives are recognised initially, and are subsequently remeasured, at fair value. Fair values of exchange-
traded derivatives are obtained from quoted market prices. Fair values of over-the-counter derivatives are
obtained using valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models and option pricing models.
Derivatives may be embedded in other financial instruments, for example, a convertible bond with an embedded
conversion option. Embedded derivatives are treated as separate derivatives when their economic characteristics
and risks are not clearly and closely related to those of the host contract; the terms of the embedded derivative
would meet the definition of a stand-alone derivative if they were contained in a separate contract; and the
combined contract is not held for trading or designated at fair value. These embedded derivatives are measured
at fair value with changes therein recognised in the income statement.
Derivatives are classified as assets when their fair value is positive, or as liabilities when their fair value is
negative. Derivative assets and liabilities arising from different transactions are only offset if the transactions are
353
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
with the same counterparty, a legal right of offset exists, and the parties intend to settle the cash flows on a net
basis.
The method of recognising fair value gains and losses depends on whether derivatives are held for trading or are
designated as hedging instruments, and if the latter, the nature of the risks being hedged. All gains and losses
from changes in the fair value of derivatives held for trading are recognised in the income statement. When
derivatives are designated as hedges, HSBC classifies them as either: (i) hedges of the change in fair value of
recognised assets or liabilities or firm commitments (‘fair value hedges’); (ii) hedges of the variability in highly
probable future cash flows attributable to a recognised asset or liability, or a forecast transaction (‘cash flow
hedges’); or (iii) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation (‘net investment hedges’). Hedge accounting
is applied to derivatives designated as hedging instruments in a fair value, cash flow or net investment hedge
provided certain criteria are met.
Hedge accounting
At the inception of a hedging relationship, HSBC documents the relationship between the hedging instruments
and the hedged items, its risk management objective and its strategy for undertaking the hedge. HSBC also
requires a documented assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether or not the
hedging instruments, primarily derivatives, that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting
the changes attributable to the hedged risks in the fair values or cash flows of the hedged items. Interest on
designated qualifying hedges is included in ‘Net interest income’.
Fair value hedge
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedging instruments are
recorded in the income statement, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or group
thereof that are attributable to the hedged risk.
If a hedging relationship no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the cumulative adjustment to the
carrying amount of the hedged item is amortised to the income statement based on a recalculated effective
interest rate over the residual period to maturity, unless the hedged item has been derecognised, in which case, it
is released to the income statement immediately.
Cash flow hedge
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow
hedges is recognised in equity within the cash flow hedging reserve. Any gain or loss in fair value relating to an
ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement.
Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled to the income statement in the periods in which the hedged item
will affect profit or loss. However, when the forecast transaction that is hedged results in the recognition of a
non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the gains and losses previously deferred in equity are transferred
from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the asset or liability.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting,
any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity until the forecast transaction is
eventually recognised in the income statement. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the
cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred to the income statement.
Net investment hedge
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations are accounted for in a similar way to cash flow hedges. A gain
or loss on the effective portion of the hedging instrument is recognised in equity; a gain or loss on the ineffective
portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. Gains and losses accumulated in equity are included
in the income statement on the disposal of the foreign operation.
Hedge effectiveness testing
To qualify for hedge accounting, HSBC requires that at the inception of the hedge and throughout its life, each
hedge must be expected to be highly effective (prospective effectiveness), and demonstrate actual effectiveness
(retrospective effectiveness) on an ongoing basis.
354
The documentation of each hedging relationship sets out how the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed. The
method an HSBC entity adopts for assessing hedge effectiveness will depend on its risk management strategy.
For prospective effectiveness, the hedging instrument must be expected to be highly effective in offsetting
changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the period for which the hedge is
designated. For actual effectiveness to be achieved, the changes in fair value or cash flows must offset each other
in the range of 80 per cent to 125 per cent.
Hedge ineffectiveness is recognised in the income statement in ‘Net trading income’.
Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting
All gains and losses from changes in the fair values of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are
recognised immediately in the income statement. These gains and losses are reported in ‘Net trading income’,
except where derivatives are managed in conjunction with financial instruments designated at fair value (other
than derivatives managed in conjunction with debt securities issued by the Group), in which case gains and
losses are reported in ‘Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value’. The interest on
derivatives managed in conjunction with debt securities issued by the Group which are designated at fair value is
recognised in ‘Interest expense’. All other gains and losses on these derivatives are reported in ‘Net income from
financial instruments designated at fair value’.
(l) Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual right to receive cash flows from the assets has expired; or
when HSBC has transferred its contractual right to receive the cash flows of the financial assets, and either:
–
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred; or
– HSBC has neither retained nor transferred substantially all the risks and rewards, but has not retained
control.
Financial liabilities are derecognised when they are extinguished, that is when the obligation is discharged,
cancelled or expires.
(m) Offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the balance sheet when there is
a legally enforceable right to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or
realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
(n) Subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
HSBC classifies investments in entities which it controls as subsidiaries. Where HSBC is a party to a contractual
arrangement whereby, together with one or more parties, it undertakes an economic activity that is subject to
joint control, HSBC classifies its interest in the venture as a joint venture. HSBC classifies investments in
entities over which it has significant influence, and that are neither subsidiaries nor joint ventures, as associates.
For the purpose of determining this classification, control is considered to be the power to govern the financial
and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
HSBC Holdings’ investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost less any impairment losses. Reversals of
impairment losses are recognised in the income statement if there has been a change in the estimates used to
determine the recoverable amount of the investment.
Investments in associates and interests in joint ventures are recognised using the equity method. Under this
method, such investments are initially stated at cost, including attributable goodwill, and are adjusted thereafter
for the post-acquisition change in HSBC’s share of net assets.
Profits on transactions between HSBC and its associates and joint ventures are eliminated to the extent of
HSBC’s interest in the respective associates or joint ventures. Losses are also eliminated to the extent of HSBC’s
interest in the associates or joint ventures unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset
transferred.
355
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
(o) Goodwill and intangible assets
(i) Goodwill arises on business combinations, including the acquisition of subsidiaries, and on the acquisition
of interests in joint ventures and associates, when the cost of acquisition exceeds the fair value of HSBC’s
share of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired. If HSBC’s interest in the fair
value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of an acquired business is greater than the
cost of acquisition, the excess is recognised immediately in the income statement.
Intangible assets are recognised separately from goodwill when they are separable or arise from contractual
or other legal rights, and their fair value can be measured reliably.
Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units for the purpose of impairment testing, which is undertaken at
the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Impairment testing is
performed at least annually, and whenever there is an indication that the cash-generating unit may be
impaired, by comparing the present value of the expected future cash flows from a cash-generating unit with
the carrying amount of its net assets, including attributable goodwill. Goodwill is stated at cost less
accumulated impairment losses. Impairment losses are charged to the income statement.
Goodwill on acquisitions of interests in joint ventures and associates is included in ‘Interests in associates
and joint ventures’.
At the date of disposal of a business, attributable goodwill is included in HSBC’s share of net assets in the
calculation of the gain or loss on disposal.
(ii) Intangible assets include the value of in-force long-term insurance business, computer software, trade
names, mortgage servicing rights, customer lists, core deposit relationships, credit card customer
relationships and merchant or other loan relationships. Intangible assets are subject to impairment review if
there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
–
–
Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life, or are not yet ready for use, are tested for
impairment annually. This impairment test may be performed at any time during the year, provided it is
performed at the same time every year. An intangible asset recognised during the current period is
tested before the end of the current year.
Intangible assets that have a finite useful life, except for the value of in-force long-term insurance
business, are stated at cost less amortisation and accumulated impairment losses and are amortised over
their estimated useful lives. Estimated useful life is the lower of legal duration and expected useful life.
The amortisation of mortgage servicing rights is included within ‘Net fee income’.
For the accounting policy governing the value of in-force long-term insurance business (see Note 2x).
(iii) Intangible assets are amortised over their finite useful lives, generally on a straight line basis, as follows:
Trade names ...........................................................................................................................
Mortgage servicing rights ......................................................................................................
Internally generated software .................................................................................................
Purchased software .................................................................................................................
Customer/merchant relationships ...........................................................................................
Other .......................................................................................................................................
10 years
generally between 5 and 12 years
between 3 and 5 years
between 3 and 5 years
between 3 and 10 years
generally 10 years
(p) Property, plant and equipment
Land and buildings are stated at historical cost, or fair value at the date of transition to IFRSs (‘deemed cost’),
less any impairment losses and depreciation calculated to write off the assets over their estimated useful lives as
follows:
–
–
–
freehold land is not depreciated;
freehold buildings are depreciated at the greater of two per cent per annum on a straight-line basis or over
their remaining useful lives; and
leasehold buildings are depreciated over the unexpired terms of the leases, or over their remaining useful
lives.
356
Equipment, fixtures and fittings (including equipment on operating leases where HSBC is the lessor) are stated
at cost less any impairment losses and depreciation calculated on a straight-line basis to write off the assets over
their useful lives, which run to a maximum of 35 years but are generally between 5 years and 20 years.
Property, plant and equipment is subject to an impairment review if there are events or changes in circumstances
which indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
HSBC holds certain properties as investments to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, or both. Investment
properties are included in the balance sheet at fair value with changes therein recognised in the income statement
in the period of change. Fair values are determined by independent professional valuers who apply recognised
valuation techniques.
(q) Finance and operating leases
Agreements which transfer to counterparties substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to the ownership of
assets, but not necessarily legal title, are classified as finance leases. When HSBC is a lessor under finance leases
the amounts due under the leases, after deduction of unearned charges, are included in ‘Loans and advances to
banks’ or ‘Loans and advances to customers’ as appropriate. The finance income receivable is recognised in
‘Net interest income’ over the periods of the leases so as to give a constant rate of return on the net investment
in the leases.
When HSBC is a lessee under finance leases, the leased assets are capitalised and included in ‘Property, plant
and equipment’ and the corresponding liability to the lessor is included in ‘Other liabilities’. A finance lease and
its corresponding liability are recognised initially at the fair value of the asset or, if lower, the present value of
the minimum lease payments. Finance charges payable are recognised in ‘Net interest income’ over the period of
the lease based on the interest rate implicit in the lease so as to give a constant rate of interest on the remaining
balance of the liability.
All other leases are classified as operating leases. When acting as lessor, HSBC includes the assets subject to
operating leases in ‘Property, plant and equipment’ and accounts for them accordingly. Impairment losses are
recognised to the extent that residual values are not fully recoverable and the carrying value of the equipment is
thereby impaired. When HSBC is the lessee, leased assets are not recognised on the balance sheet. Rentals
payable and receivable under operating leases are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the periods of the
leases and are included in ‘General and administrative expenses’ and ‘Other operating income’, respectively.
(r) Income tax
Income tax comprises current tax and deferred tax. Income tax is recognised in the income statement except to
the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity, in which case it is recognised in equity.
Current tax is the tax expected to be payable on the taxable profit for the year, calculated using tax rates enacted
or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous
years. Current tax assets and liabilities are offset when HSBC intends to settle on a net basis and the legal right
to offset exists.
Deferred tax is recognised on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the
balance sheet and the amounts attributed to such assets and liabilities for tax purposes. Deferred tax liabilities are
generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent
that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can
be utilised.
Deferred tax is calculated using the tax rates expected to apply in the periods in which the assets will be realised
or the liabilities settled, based on tax rates and laws enacted, or substantively enacted, by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when they arise in the same tax reporting group and relate to income
taxes levied by the same taxation authority, and when a legal right to offset exists in the entity.
Deferred tax relating to actuarial gains and losses on post-employment benefits is recognised directly in equity.
Deferred tax relating to fair value remeasurement of available-for-sale investments and cash flow hedging
instruments which are charged or credited directly to equity, is also credited or charged directly to equity and is
subsequently recognised in the income statement when the deferred fair value gain or loss is recognised in the
income statement.
357
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
(s) Pension and other post-employment benefits
HSBC operates a number of pension and other post-employment benefit plans throughout the world. These plans
include both defined benefit and defined contribution plans and various other post-employment benefits such as
post-employment health-care.
Payments to defined contribution plans and state-managed retirement benefit plans, where HSBC’s obligations
under the plans are equivalent to a defined contribution plan, are charged as an expense as they fall due.
The defined benefit pension costs and the present value of defined benefit obligations are calculated at the
reporting date by the schemes’ actuaries using the Projected Unit Credit Method. The net charge to the income
statement mainly comprises the current service cost, plus the unwinding of the discount rate on plan liabilities,
less the expected return on plan assets, and is presented in operating expenses. Past service costs are charged
immediately to the income statement to the extent that the benefits have vested, and are otherwise recognised
on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits vest. Actuarial gains and losses comprise
experience adjustments (the effects of differences between the previous actuarial assumptions and what has
actually occurred), as well as the effects of changes in actuarial assumptions. Actuarial gains and losses are
recognised in ‘Shareholders’ equity’ and presented in the Statement of Recognised Income and Expense in the
period in which they arise.
The defined benefit liability recognised in the balance sheet represents the present value of defined benefit
obligations adjusted for unrecognised past service costs and reduced by the fair value of plan assets. Any net
defined benefit surplus is limited to unrecognised past service costs plus the present value of available refunds
and reductions in future contributions to the plan.
The costs of obligations arising from other defined post-employment benefits plans, such as defined benefit
health-care plans, are accounted for on the same basis as defined benefit pension plans.
(t) Share-based payments
The cost of share-based payment arrangements with employees is measured by reference to the fair value of
equity instruments on the date they are granted, and recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period, with a corresponding credit to the ‘Share-based payment reserve’. The fair value of equity
instruments that are made available immediately, with no vesting period attached to the award, are expensed
immediately.
Fair value is determined by using appropriate valuation models, taking into account the terms and conditions
upon which the equity instruments were granted. Market performance conditions are reflected as an adjustment
to the fair value of equity instruments at the date of grant, so that an award is treated as vesting irrespective of
whether the market performance condition is satisfied, provided all other conditions are satisfied.
Vesting conditions, other than market performance conditions, are not factored into the initial estimate of the fair
value at the grant date. They are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments included in the
measurement of the transaction, so that the amount recognised for services received as consideration for the
equity instruments granted shall be based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest. On a
cumulative basis, no expense is recognised for equity instruments that do not vest because of a failure to satisfy
non-market performance or service conditions.
Where an award has been modified, as a minimum the expense of the original award continues to be recognised
as if it had not been modified. Where the effect of a modification is to increase the fair value of an award or
increase the number of equity instruments, the incremental fair value of the award or incremental fair value of
the extra equity instruments is recognised in addition to the expense of the original grant, measured at the date of
modification, over the remaining vesting period.
A cancellation that occurs during the vesting period is treated as an acceleration of vesting, and recognised
immediately for the amount that would otherwise have been recognised for services over the vesting period.
Where HSBC Holdings enters into share-based payment arrangements involving employees of subsidiaries, the
cost is recognised in ‘Investment in subsidiaries’ and credited to the ‘Share-based payment reserve’ over the
vesting period. Where the cost is recharged to the subsidiary, it is recognised as an inter-company debtor, not as
an investment in subsidiary. Where a subsidiary has funded the share-based payment arrangement, ‘Investment
358
in subsidiaries’ is reduced upon exercise by the number of equity instruments exercised multiplied by their grant
date fair value.
(u) Foreign currencies
Items included in the financial statements of each of HSBC’s entities are measured using the currency of the
primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the functional currency’). The consolidated
financial statements of HSBC are presented in US dollars, which is the Group’s presentation currency.
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded in the functional currency at the rate of exchange prevailing on
the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into
the functional currency at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. Any resulting exchange
differences are included in the income statement. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at
historical cost in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency using the rate of exchange at the
date of the initial transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a foreign currency are
translated into the functional currency using the rate of exchange at the date the fair value was determined. Any
exchange component of a gain or loss on a non-monetary item is recognised directly in equity if the gain or loss
on the non-monetary item is recognised directly in equity. Any exchange component of a gain or loss on a non-
monetary item is recognised directly in the income statement if the gain or loss on the non-monetary item is
recognised in the income statement.
In the consolidated financial statements, the assets, including related goodwill where applicable, and liabilities of
branches, subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates whose functional currency is not US dollars, are translated
into the Group’s presentation currency at the rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. The results of
branches, subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates whose functional currency is not US dollars are translated
into US dollars at the average rates of exchange for the reporting period. Exchange differences arising from the
retranslation of opening foreign currency net investments, and exchange differences arising from retranslation of
the result for the reporting period from the average rate to the exchange rate prevailing at the period end, are
recognised in equity in the ‘Foreign exchange reserve’. Exchange differences on a monetary item that is part of a
net investment in a foreign operation are recognised in the income statement of the separate financial statements.
In consolidated financial statements these exchange differences are recognised in the ‘Foreign exchange reserve’
in shareholders’ equity. On disposal of a foreign operation, exchange differences relating thereto and previously
recognised in reserves are recognised in the income statement.
(v) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle a
current legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, and a reliable estimate can be made of the
amount of the obligation.
Contingent liabilities, which include certain guarantees and letters of credit pledged as collateral security, are
possible obligations that arise from past events whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence, or
non-occurrence, of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of HSBC. Contingent
liabilities are not recognised in the financial statements but are disclosed unless the probability of settlement is
remote.
(w) Financial guarantee contracts
Liabilities under financial guarantees contracts which are not classified as insurance contracts, are recorded
initially at their fair value, which is generally the fee received or receivable. Subsequently, financial guarantee
liabilities are measured at the higher of the initial fair value, less cumulative amortisation, and the best estimate
of the expenditure required to settle the obligations.
HSBC Holdings has issued financial guarantees to other Group entities. Where it has previously asserted
explicitly that it regards such contracts as insurance contracts and has used accounting applicable to insurance
contracts, HSBC may elect to account for guarantees as an insurance contract. This election is made on a
contract by contract basis, but the election for each contract is irrevocable. Where these guarantees have been
classified as insurance contracts, they are measured and recognised as insurance liabilities.
359
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 2
(x) Insurance contracts
Through its insurance subsidiaries, HSBC issues contracts to customers that contain insurance risk, financial risk
or a combination thereof. A contract under which HSBC accepts significant insurance risk from another party by
agreeing to compensate that party on the occurrence of a specified uncertain future event, is classified as an
insurance contract. An insurance contract may also transfer financial risk, but is accounted for as an insurance
contract if the insurance risk is significant.
While investment contracts with discretionary participation features are financial instruments, they continue to
be treated as insurance contracts as permitted by IFRS 4.
Insurance contracts are accounted for as follows:
Premiums
Gross insurance premiums for non-life insurance business are reported as income over the term of the insurance
contracts based on the proportion of risks borne during the accounting period. The unearned premium (the
proportion of the business underwritten in the accounting year relating to the period of risk after the balance
sheet date) is calculated on a daily or monthly pro rata basis.
Premiums for life insurance contracts are accounted for when receivable, except in unit-linked insurance
contracts where premiums are accounted for when liabilities are established.
Reinsurance premiums are accounted for in the same accounting period as the premiums for the direct insurance
contracts to which they relate.
Claims and reinsurance recoveries
Gross insurance claims for non-life insurance contracts include paid claims and movements in outstanding
claims liabilities.
Gross insurance claims for life insurance contracts reflect the total cost of claims arising during the year,
including claim handling costs and any policyholder bonuses allocated in anticipation of a bonus declaration.
Claims arising during the year include maturities, surrenders and death claims.
Maturity claims are recognised when due for payment. Surrenders are recognised when paid or at an earlier date
on which, following notification, the policy ceases to be included within the calculation of the related insurance
liabilities. Death claims are recognised when notified.
Reinsurance recoveries are accounted for in the same period as the related claim.
Liabilities under insurance contracts
Outstanding claims liabilities for non-life insurance contracts are based on the estimated ultimate cost of all
claims incurred but not settled at the balance sheet date, whether reported or not, together with related claim-
handling costs and a reduction for the expected value of salvage and other recoveries. Liabilities for claims
incurred but not reported are made on an estimated basis, using appropriate statistical techniques.
Liabilities under non-linked life insurance contracts are calculated by each life insurance operation based on
local actuarial principles.
Liabilities under unit-linked life insurance contracts are at least equivalent to the surrender or transfer value
which is calculated by reference to the value of the relevant underlying funds or indices.
A liability adequacy test is carried out on insurance liabilities to ensure that the carrying amount of the liabilities
is sufficient in the light of current estimates of future cash flows. When performing the liability adequacy test, all
contractual cash flows are discounted and compared with the carrying value of the liability. When a shortfall is
identified it is charged immediately to the income statement.
Present value of in-force long-term insurance business
The value placed on insurance contracts that are classified as long-term insurance business and are in force at the
balance sheet date is recognised as an asset.
360
The PVIF long-term insurance business is determined by discounting future cash flows expected to emerge from
business currently in force using appropriate assumptions in assessing factors such as future mortality, lapse
rates and levels of expenses and a risk discount rate that reflects the risk premium attributable to the respective
long-term insurance business. Movements in the PVIF long-term insurance business are included in ‘Other
operating income’ on a gross of tax basis.
Future profit participation
Where contracts provide discretionary profit participation benefits to policyholders, insurance liabilities include
the net unrealised gains recognised in connection with the assets backing the contracts to the extent that
policyholders will benefit from such gains. This benefit may arise from the contractual terms, regulation, or past
distribution policy. The corresponding movement in liability is recognised in equity or in the income statement
in the same proportion to the net unrealised gains on the assets. In the case of net unrealised losses, a deferred
participating asset is recognised only to the extent that its recoverability is highly probable.
(y) Investment contracts
Customer liabilities under linked and certain non-linked investment contracts and the corresponding financial
assets are designated at fair value. Movements in fair value are recognised in ‘Net income from financial
investments designated at fair value’. Premiums receivable and amounts withdrawn are accounted for as
increases or decreases in the liability recorded in respect of investment contracts.
Liabilities under linked investment contracts are at least equivalent to the surrender or transfer value which is
calculated by reference to the value of the relevant underlying funds or indices.
Investment management fees receivable are recognised in the income statement over the period of the provision
of the investment management services, in ‘Net fee income’.
The incremental costs directly related to the acquisition of new investment contracts or renewing existing
investment contracts are deferred and amortised over the period during which the investment management
services are provided.
(z) Debt securities issued and deposits by customers and banks
Financial liabilities are recognised when HSBC enters into the contractual provisions of the arrangements with
counterparties, which is generally on trade date, and initially measured at fair value, which is normally the
consideration received net of directly attributable transaction costs incurred. Subsequent measurement of
financial liabilities, other than those measured at fair value through profit or loss and financial guarantees, is at
amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method to amortise the difference between proceeds net of
directly attributable transaction costs and the redemption amount over the expected life of the debt.
(aa) Share capital
Shares are classified as equity when there is no contractual obligation to transfer cash or other financial assets.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of equity instruments are shown in equity as a deduction from
the proceeds, net of tax.
HSBC Holdings plc shares held by HSBC are recognised in ‘Total shareholders’ equity’ as a deduction from
retained earnings until they are cancelled. When such shares are subsequently sold, reissued or otherwise
disposed of, any consideration received is included in ‘Total shareholders’ equity’, net of any directly
attributable incremental transaction costs and related income tax effects.
(ab) Cash and cash equivalents
For the purpose of the cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments that are
readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of change in value.
Such investments are normally those with less than three months’ maturity from the date of acquisition, and
include cash and balances at central banks, treasury bills and other eligible bills, loans and advances to banks,
items in the course of collection from or in transmission to other banks, and certificates of deposit.
361
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 3, 4 and 5
3 Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value includes:
•
•
•
all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value,
including liabilities under investment contracts;
all gains and losses from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are managed in conjunction with financial
assets and liabilities designated at fair value; and
interest income, interest expense and dividend income in respect of:
–
financial assets and liabilities designated at fair value; and
–
derivatives managed in conjunction with the above,
except for interest arising on HSBC’s issued debt securities, together with the interest element of derivatives
managed in conjunction with them, which are recognised in ‘Interest expense’.
Net income/(expense) arising on:
– financial assets held to meet liabilities under insurance and
investment contracts .......................................................................................
– other financial assets designated at fair value ................................................
– derivatives managed in conjunction with financial assets designated
at fair value .....................................................................................................
– liabilities to customers under investment contracts .......................................
– HSBC’s issued debt securities1 ......................................................................
– derivatives managed in conjunction with HSBC’s issued debt securities .....
– other financial liabilities designated at fair value ..........................................
– derivatives managed in conjunction with other financial liabilities
designated at fair value ...................................................................................
Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value ........................
2007
US$m
2,056
581
(18)
2,619
(940)
336
2,476
(395)
(13)
1,464
4,083
2006
US$m
1,552
217
57
1,826
(1,008)
(277)
242
(125)
(1)
(1,169)
657
2005
US$m
1,760
90
17
1,867
(1,126)
1,795
(1,392)
(112)
2
(833)
1,034
1 Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of HSBC’s issued debt securities may arise from changes in HSBC’s own credit spread.
In 2007 HSBC recognised a US$3,055 million gain on changes in the fair value of these instruments arising from changes in HSBC’s
own credit spread (2006: loss US$388 million).
4 Gains from dilution of interests in associates
During 2007, certain HSBC associates issued new shares. HSBC did not subscribe for any of the shares issued under
these offers and, as a result, its interests in the associates’ equity decreased. The assets of each associate substantially
increased as a result of the new share issues and, as a consequence, the transactions resulted in an increase in HSBC’s
share of the associates’ underlying net assets, notwithstanding the reduction in the Group’s proportionate ownership
interests. This increase represents gains from dilution of the Group’s interests in the associates, and is presented in the
income statement.
Associates
Industrial Bank1 ...........................................................................................
Ping An Insurance .......................................................................................
Bank of Communications2 ..........................................................................
Financiera Independencia S.A. de C.V. ......................................................
Vietnam Technological and Commercial Joint Stock Bank .......................
Year ended 31 December 2007
Gains arising
from dilution
of HSBC’s
interests
US$m
187
485
404
11
5
HSBC’s
interests after
issue of
new shares
%
12.78
16.78
18.60
18.68
14.44
HSBC’s
interests before
issue of
new shares
%
15.98
19.90
19.90
19.90
15.00
Gains arising from dilution of interests in associates .....................................
1,092
1 Investment held through Hang Seng Bank, a 62.14 per cent owned subsidiary of HSBC. The dilution gains therefore include a minority
interest of US$71 million.
2 Subsequent to the dilution of its interests in Bank of Communications, HSBC increased its holding from 18.60 per cent to 19.01 per cent
at 31 December 2007 (Note 21).
362
The dilution does not affect the classification of the Group’s investments as ‘Investments in associates’ as the Group
continues to retain significant influence (see Note 21).
5 Net earned insurance premiums
Non-life
insurance
US$m
Life
insurance
(non-linked)
US$m
Life
insurance
(linked)
US$m
Investment
contracts with
discretionary
participation
features
US$m
2007
Gross written premiums ............................
Movement in unearned premiums ............
Gross earned premiums ............................
Gross written premiums ceded
to reinsurers ..........................................
Reinsurers’ share of movement
in unearned premiums ..........................
Reinsurers’ share of gross earned
premiums ..............................................
Net earned insurance premiums ................
2006
Gross written premiums ............................
Movement in unearned premiums ............
Gross earned premiums ............................
Gross written premiums ceded
to reinsurers ..........................................
Reinsurers’ share of movement
in unearned premiums ..........................
Reinsurers’ share of gross earned
premiums ..............................................
Net earned insurance premiums ................
2005
Gross written premiums ............................
Movement in unearned premiums ............
Gross earned premiums ............................
Gross written premiums ceded
to reinsurers ..........................................
Reinsurers’ share of movement
in unearned premiums ..........................
Reinsurers’ share of gross earned
premiums ..............................................
Net earned insurance premiums ................
1,853
2
1,855
(385)
(22)
(407)
1,448
1,824
122
1,946
(451)
(48)
(499)
1,447
2,364
(225)
2,139
(479)
60
(419)
1,720
4,892
14
4,906
(357)
–
(357)
4,549
3,640
14
3,654
(274)
–
(274)
3,380
3,441
2
3,443
(277)
–
(277)
3,166
2,350
–
2,350
(1,166)
5
(1,161)
1,189
848
(1)
847
(14)
–
(14)
833
768
(210)
558
(20)
–
(20)
538
1,890
–
1,890
–
–
–
1,890
8
–
8
–
–
–
8
12
–
12
–
–
–
12
Total
US$m
10,985
16
11,001
(1,908)
(17)
(1,925)
9,076
6,320
135
6,455
(739)
(48)
(787)
5,668
6,585
(433)
6,152
(776)
60
(716)
5,436
363
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 6, 7 and 8
6 Net insurance claims incurred and movement in liabilities to policyholders
Non-life
insurance
US$m
Life
insurance
(non-linked)
US$m
Life
insurance
(linked)
US$m
Investment
contracts with
discretionary
participation
features
US$m
1,017
82
940
2,437
790
2,096
1,080
1,108
Total
US$m
3,827
5,723
2007
Claims, benefits and surrenders paid ........
Movement in liabilities .............................
Gross claims incurred and movement
in liabilities ...........................................
1,099
3,377
2,886
2,188
9,550
(207)
36
(171)
(169)
518
(45)
(1,075)
349
(1,120)
–
–
–
(421)
(521)
(942)
928
3,726
1,766
2,188
8,608
Reinsurers’ share of claims, benefits
and surrenders paid ...............................
Reinsurers’ share of movement
in liabilities ...........................................
Reinsurers’ share of claims incurred
and movement in liabilities ...................
Net insurance claims incurred and
movement in liabilities to
policyholders ........................................
2006
Claims, benefits and surrenders paid ........
Movement in liabilities .............................
Gross claims incurred and movement
in liabilities ...........................................
Reinsurers’ share of claims, benefits
and surrenders paid ...............................
Reinsurers’ share of movement
in liabilities ...........................................
Reinsurers’ share of claims incurred
and movement in liabilities ...................
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ........................................
2005
Claims, benefits and surrenders paid ........
Movement in liabilities .............................
Gross claims incurred and movement
889
10
899
(228)
57
(171)
814
2,207
495
651
3,021
1,146
(154)
(54)
(208)
(9)
20
11
728
2,813
1,157
966
72
621
1,683
357
445
802
(11)
(11)
(22)
in liabilities ...........................................
1,038
2,304
Reinsurers’ share of claims, benefits
and surrenders paid ...............................
Reinsurers’ share of movement
in liabilities ...........................................
(146)
2
Reinsurers’ share of claims incurred
and movement in liabilities ...................
(144)
(111)
191
80
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ........................................
894
2,384
780
364
–
6
6
–
–
–
6
–
9
9
–
–
–
9
2,198
2,874
5,072
(391)
23
(368)
4,704
1,944
2,209
4,153
(268)
182
(86)
4,067
7 Net operating income
Net operating income is stated after the following items of income, expense, gains and losses:
Income
Interest recognised on impaired financial assets .............................................
Fees earned on financial assets or liabilities not held for trading nor
designated at fair value, other than fees included in effective interest
rate calculations on these types of assets and liabilities .............................
Fees earned on trust and other fiduciary activities where HSBC holds
or invests assets on behalf of its customers .................................................
Income from listed investments .......................................................................
Income from unlisted investments ...................................................................
Expense
Interest on financial instruments, excluding interest on financial
2007
US$m
404
15,140
3,695
10,944
10,429
2006
US$m
284
11,182
2,909
7,304
9,192
2005
US$m
120
9,077
2,912
6,819
5,001
liabilities held for trading or designated at fair value .................................
(50,876)
(38,158)
(26,627)
Fees payable on financial assets or liabilities not held for trading nor
designated at fair value, other than fees included in effective
interest rate calculations on these types of assets and liabilities ................
Fees payable relating to trust and other fiduciary activities where
HSBC holds or invests assets on behalf of its customers ...........................
Gains/(losses)
Gain/(loss) on disposal or settlement of loans and advances ..........................
Net impairment loss on loans and advances ....................................................
Net (charge)/reversal of impairment allowances in respect of
available-for-sale financial investments ......................................................
Gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and
non-financial investments ...........................................................................
8 Employee compensation and benefits
Wages and salaries ...........................................................................................
Social security costs .........................................................................................
Post-employment benefits ...............................................................................
(1,923)
(1,826)
(1,357)
(163)
(103)
(238)
64
(17,177)
(86)
213
2007
US$m
18,535
1,587
1,212
21,334
24
(10,547)
(21)
781
2006
US$m
16,186
1,194
1,120
18,500
2006
84,170
27,328
68,182
57,654
58,863
(12)
(7,860)
42
703
2005
US$m
14,008
1,072
1,065
16,145
2005
82,638
25,699
50,605
51,518
54,825
The average number of persons employed by HSBC during the year was as follows:
Europe ..............................................................................................................
Hong Kong .......................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .........................................................................................
North America .................................................................................................
Latin America ..................................................................................................
2007
86,918
27,702
83,103
58,117
66,442
Total .................................................................................................................
322,282
296,197
265,285
Post-employment benefit plans
Income statement charge
Defined benefit pension plans .........................................................................
– HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme .............................................................
– Other plans ....................................................................................................
Defined contribution plans ..............................................................................
Defined benefit healthcare plans .....................................................................
365
2007
US$m
694
490
204
485
1,179
33
1,212
2006
US$m
602
342
260
456
1,058
62
1,120
2005
US$m
618
410
208
389
1,007
58
1,065
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 8
Net liabilities recognised on balance sheet in respect of defined benefit plans
Defined benefit pension plans ...........................................................................................................
– HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme ...............................................................................................
– Other plans ......................................................................................................................................
Defined benefit healthcare plan .........................................................................................................
2007
US$m
1,968
808
1,160
925
2,893
2006
US$m
4,553
3,745
808
1,002
5,555
HSBC pension plans
HSBC operates some 196 pension plans throughout the world, covering 86 per cent of HSBC’s employees, with a
total pension cost of US$1,179 million (2006: US$1,058 million; 2005: US$1,007 million), of which US$626 million
(2006: US$668 million; 2005: US$546 million) relates to plans outside the UK.
Progressively, HSBC has been moving to defined contribution plans for all new employees. The pension cost for
defined contribution plans, which cover 49 per cent of HSBC’s employees, was US$485 million (2006:
US$456 million; 2005: US$389 million).
Both HSBC’s and, where relevant and appropriate, the trustees’ long-term investment objectives for defined benefit
plans are:
•
•
to limit the risk of the assets failing to meet the liability of the plans over the long-term; and
to maximise returns consistent with an acceptable level of risk so as to control the long-term costs of the defined
benefit plans.
Both HSBC and, where relevant and appropriate, the trustees, consider that the investment policy should be
consistent with meeting their mutual overall long-term investment objectives. In pursuit of these long-term
objectives, a benchmark is established for the allocation of the defined benefit plan assets between asset classes. In
addition, each permitted asset class has its own benchmarks, such as stock market or property valuation indices and
desired levels of out-performance where relevant. This is intended to be reviewed at least triennially within 18
months of the date at which the actuarial valuation is made, or more frequently if circumstances or local legislation so
require. The process generally involves an extensive asset and liability review.
The Group’s defined benefit plans, which cover 37 per cent of HSBC’s employees, are predominantly funded plans
with assets which, in the case of most of the larger plans, are held in trust or similar funds separate from HSBC. The
plans are reviewed at least annually or in accordance with local practice and regulations by qualified actuaries. The
actuarial assumptions used to calculate the defined benefit obligations and related current service costs vary
according to the economic conditions of the countries in which they are situated.
The largest plan exists in the UK, where the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme covers employees of HSBC Bank plc
and certain other employees of HSBC. This plan comprises a funded defined benefit plan (‘the principal plan’) which
is closed to new entrants, and a defined contribution plan which was established on 1 July 1996 for new employees.
The principal plan holds a diversified portfolio of investments to meet future cash flow liabilities arising from
accrued benefits as they fall due to be paid. The Trustee of the principal plan is required to produce a written
Statement of Investment Principles (‘SIP’). The SIP sets out the principles governing how decisions about
investments are made.
In 2006, HSBC and the Trustee of the principal plan agreed to change the investment strategy in order to reduce the
investment risk. This involved switching from a largely equity-based strategy to a strategy largely based on holding
bonds together with a more diverse range of investments. The principal plan committed to undertake a programme
including entering into swap arrangements whereby the principal plan is committed to making LIBOR related interest
payments in exchange for cash flows paid into the plan, based on a projection of the future benefit payments from the
principal plan. The asset allocation for this strategy is:
366
Equities ................................................................................................................................................................................
Bonds ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Alternative assets1 ................................................................................................................................................................
Property ................................................................................................................................................................................
Cash .....................................................................................................................................................................................
%
15.0
50.0
10.0
10.0
15.0
100.0
1 Alternative assets include emerging market bonds, loans, and infrastructure assets.
At 31 December 2007, this strategy was substantially in place and details of the swap arrangements are included in
Note 44.
The latest actuarial investigation of the principal plan was made at 31 December 2005, by C G Singer, Fellow of the
Institute of Actuaries, of Watson Wyatt Limited. At that date, the market value of the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension
Scheme’s assets was US$18,072 million (including assets relating to the defined benefit plan, the defined
contribution plan, and additional voluntary contributions). The market value of the plan assets represented 89 per cent
of the amount expected to be required, on the basis of the assumptions adopted, to provide the benefits accrued to
members after allowing for expected future increases in earnings, and the resulting deficit amounted to
US$2,065 million. The method adopted for this investigation was the projected unit method. The expected cash flows
from the plan were projected by reference to the Retail Price Index (‘RPI’) swap break-even curve at 31 December
2005. Salary increases were assumed to be 1 per cent per annum above RPI and inflationary pension increases,
subject to a minimum of 0 per cent and a maximum of 5 per cent, were assumed to be in line with RPI. The projected
cash flows were discounted at the LIBOR swap curve at 31 December 2005 plus a margin for the expected return on
the investment strategy of 110 basis points per annum. The mortality experience of the plan’s pensioners over the
three year period since the previous valuation was analysed and the mortality assumption set on the basis of this with
allowances for medium cohort improvements on the PA92 series of tables from the valuation date.
In anticipation of the results of the 2005 investigation, on 22 December 2005 HSBC Bank plc made an additional
contribution of US$1,746 million to the principal plan in order to reduce the deficit of the plan. Following receipt of
the valuation results, HSBC agreed with the Trustee to meet a schedule of additional future funding payments, as set
out below:
2007 ......................................................................................................................................................
2012 ......................................................................................................................................................
2013 .......................................................................................................................................................
2014 .......................................................................................................................................................
US$m1
587
933
933
933
£m
300
465
465
465
1 The payment schedule has been agreed with the Trustee in pounds sterling and the equivalent US dollar amounts are shown at the
exchange rate effective as at 31 December 2007, or as at the date of payment in respect of the contribution made during the period.
HSBC considers that the contributions set out above are sufficient to meet the deficit as at 31 December 2005 over
the agreed period. HSBC Bank plc made the contribution of US$587 million in March 2007.
HSBC also decided to make ongoing contributions to the principal plan in respect of the accrual of benefits of
defined benefit section members at the rate of 36 per cent of pensionable salaries from 1 January 2007, until the
completion of the next actuarial valuation, due at 31 December 2008. During 2006 HSBC paid contributions at the
rate of 20 per cent of pensionable salaries. A further 2 per cent of pensionable salaries is being paid over the period
1 January 2007 to 31 December 2014 to make good the difference in contributions during 2006.
As part of the 31 December 2005 valuation, calculations were also carried out as to the amount of assets that might be
needed to meet the liabilities if the plan was discontinued and the members’ benefits bought out with an insurance
company (although in practice this may not be possible for a plan of this size) or the Trustee continued to run the plan
without the support of HSBC. The amount required under this approach is estimated to be US$26,700 million as at
31 December 2005. In estimating the solvency position for this purpose, a more prudent assumption about future
mortality was made than for the assessment of the ongoing position and it was assumed that the Trustee would alter
the investment strategy to be an appropriately matched portfolio of cash and interest and inflation swaps. An explicit
allowance for expenses was also included.
The benefits payable from the defined benefit plan are expected to be as shown in the chart below:
367
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 8
Benefit payments (US$m)
2,000
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
2007
2018
2029
2040
2051
2062
2073
2084
In Hong Kong, the HSBC Group Hong Kong Local Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme covers employees of The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation and certain other employees of HSBC Group. The scheme comprises a
funded defined benefit scheme (which provides a lump sum on retirement but is now closed to new members) and a
defined contribution scheme. The latter was established on 1 January 1999 for new employees. The latest valuation of
the defined benefit plan was made at 31 December 2006 and was performed by Estella Chiu, Fellow of the Society of
Actuaries of the United States of America, of HSBC Life (International) Limited, a subsidiary of HSBC Holdings. At
the valuation date, the market value of the defined benefit scheme’s assets was US$1,109 million. On an ongoing
basis, the actuarial value of the scheme’s assets represented 119 per cent of the actuarial present value of the benefits
accrued to members, after allowing for expected future increases in salaries, and the resulting surplus amounted to
US$174 million. On a wind-up basis, the scheme’s assets represented 126 per cent of the members’ vested benefits,
based on current salaries, and the resulting surplus amounted to US$228 million. The attained age method has been
adopted for the valuation and the major assumptions used in this valuation were a discount rate of 4 per cent per
annum and long-term salary increases of 3 per cent per annum (with short-term deviation from 2007 to 2008).
The HSBC North America (U.S.) Retirement Income Plan was formed with effect from the close of business on
31 December 2004 by the merger of the HSBC Bank USA Pension Plan and the Household International Retirement
Income Plan. This plan covers employees of HSBC Bank USA, HSBC Finance, and certain other employees of
HSBC USA. It comprises a final average pay plan (now closed to new participants) and a cash balance plan. All
new employees participate in the cash balance plan. The most recent actuarial valuation of the plan was made at 1
January 2007 by Pedro Nebres, Fellow of the Society of Actuaries and John P. Ennenbach, Enrolled Actuary, of
Mercer. Both are members of the American Academy of Actuaries. At that date, the market value of the merged
plan’s assets was US$2,577 million and the actuarial value of assets was US$2,504 million. The actuarial value of
the assets represented 119 per cent of the benefits accrued to members, after allowing for expected future increases
in earnings. The resulting surplus amounted to US$407 million. The method employed for this valuation was the
projected unit credit method and the main assumptions used were a discount rate of 8 per cent per annum and
average salary increases of 3.75 per cent per annum.
The HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme, The HSBC Group Hong Kong Local Staff Retirement Benefit Scheme, and
the HSBC North America (U.S.) Retirement Income Plan cover 33 per cent of HSBC’s employees.
HSBC healthcare benefits plans
HSBC also provides post-employment healthcare benefits under plans in the UK, the US, Canada, Mexico, France
and Brazil, the majority of which are unfunded. Post-employment healthcare benefits plans are accounted for in the
same manner as defined benefit pension plans. The plans are reviewed at least annually or in accordance with local
practice and regulations by qualified actuaries. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the defined benefit
obligation and related current service cost vary according to the economic conditions of the countries in which they
are situated. Total healthcare cost was US$33 million (2006: US$62 million; 2005: US$58 million).
368
Post-employment defined benefit plans’ principal actuarial financial assumptions
The principal actuarial financial assumptions used to calculate the Group’s obligations under its defined benefit
pension and post-employment healthcare plans at 31 December 2007, were as follows. These assumptions will also
form the basis for measuring periodic costs under the plans in 2008:
Healthcare cost trend
Discount
rate
Inflation
rate
Rate of
increase for
pensions1
Rate
of pay
increase
Initial
rate
Ultimate
UK ..........................................
Hong Kong .............................
US ..........................................
Jersey ......................................
Mexico ...................................
Brazil ......................................
France .....................................
Canada ...................................
Switzerland ............................
Germany .................................
%
5.8
3.45
6.55
5.8
7.88
10.75
5.5
5.43
3.3
5.5
%
3.3
n/a
2.5
3.3
3.5
4.5
2.0
2.5
1.5
2.0
%
3.3
n/a
n/a
3.3
2.0
4.5
2.0
n/a
n/a
2.0
%
4.3
5.02
3.75
5.05
4.5
4.5
3.0
3.86
2.38
3.0
%
7.3
n/a
9.6
n/a
6.0
10.5
6.0
9.0
n/a
n/a
1 Rate of increase for pensions in payment and deferred pension.
The principal actuarial financial assumptions used to calculate the Group’s obligations under its defined benefit
pension and post-employment healthcare plans at 31 December 2006, were as follows. These assumptions also
formed the basis for measuring periodic costs under the plans in 2007:
Healthcare cost trend
Discount
rate
Inflation
rate
Rate of
increase for
pensions1
Rate
of pay
increase
Initial
rate
Ultimate
Year of
ultimate
rate
n/a
n/a
2014
n/a
n/a
2017
n/a
2012
n/a
n/a
rate
%
7.3
n/a
5.0
n/a
6.0
5.5
6.0
4.9
n/a
n/a
Year of
ultimate
rate
n/a
n/a
2014
n/a
n/a
2016
n/a
2012
n/a
n/a
rate
%
7.0
n/a
5.0
n/a
6.75
5.5
6.0
4.9
n/a
n/a
UK ..........................................
Hong Kong .............................
US ..........................................
Jersey ......................................
Mexico ...................................
Brazil ......................................
France .....................................
Canada ...................................
Switzerland ............................
Germany .................................
%
5.1
3.75
5.9
5.1
8.0
10.75
4.5
5.19
2.25
4.5
%
3.0
n/a
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.5
2.0
2.5
1.5
2.0
%
3.0
n/a
n/a
3.0
2.0
4.5
2.0
n/a
n/a
2.0
%
4.0
3.0
3.75
4.75
4.0
4.5
3.0
3.47
2.25
3.0
%
7.0
n/a
10.5
n/a
6.75
11.0
6.0
9.9
n/a
n/a
1 Rate of increase for pensions in payment and deferred pension.
369
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 8
The principal actuarial financial assumptions used to calculate the Group’s obligations under its defined benefit
pension and post-employment healthcare plans at 31 December 2005, were as follows. These assumptions also
formed the basis for measuring periodic costs under the plans in 2006:
Healthcare cost trend
Discount
rate
Inflation
rate
Rate of
increase for
pensions1
Rate
of pay
increase
Initial
rate
Ultimate
UK ..........................................
Hong Kong ............................
US ..........................................
Jersey .....................................
Mexico ...................................
Brazil ......................................
France ....................................
Canada ...................................
Switzerland ............................
Germany .................................
%
4.75
4.2
5.7
4.75
8.90
11.75
4.1
5.25
2.25
4.0
%
2.7
n/a
2.5
2.7
3.75
5.5
2.0
2.5
1.5
2.0
%
2.7
n/a
n/a
2.7
3.75
5.5
2.0
n/a
n/a
2.0
%
3.72
5.0
3.75
4.45
4.5
5.5
3.0
3.0
2.25
3.0
%
6.7
n/a
10.4
n/a
7.3
12.5
6.0
7.3
n/a
n/a
Year of
ultimate
rate
n/a
n/a
2013
n/a
n/a
2016
n/a
2009
n/a
n/a
rate
%
6.7
n/a
5.0
n/a
7.3
6.5
6.0
4.5
n/a
n/a
1 Rate of increase for pensions in payment and deferred pension.
2 The 2005 rate of pay increase assumptions disclosed have been increased from 3.2 per cent to 3.7 per cent to reflect an age-related
promotional salary scale that was included in the obligation calculation but not in the disclosed assumption.
HSBC determines the discount rates to be applied to its obligations in consultation with the plans’ local actuaries, on
the basis of current average yields of high quality (AA rated or equivalent) debt instruments, with maturities
consistent with those of the defined benefit obligations. The expected return on plan assets represents the best
estimate of long-term future asset returns, which takes into account historical market returns plus additional factors
such as the current rate of inflation and interest rates.
Mortality assumptions are increasingly significant in measuring the Group’s obligations under its defined benefit
pension and post-employment healthcare plans, particularly given the maturity of the plans. The mortality tables and
average life expectancy at 65 used at 31 December 2007 were as follows:
Mortality table
UK .......................................................................... PA921
Hong Kong ............................................................ n/a
US .......................................................................... RP 2000 fully
Jersey ..................................................................... PA922
Mexico ................................................................... EMSSA-97
Brazil ...................................................................... RP 2000 fully
generational
generational
France .................................................................... TG 05
Canada pension plans ............................................ Between UP94 C2015
Canada healthcare plan .......................................... UP94 C2025
Switzerland ............................................................ BVG 2005 (3% load)
Germany ................................................................. Heubeck 2005 G
and UP94 C2027
Life expectancy at
age 65 for a male
member currently:
Aged 65
Aged 45
Life expectancy at
age 65 for a female
member currently:
Aged 65
Aged 45
20.4
n/a
19.1
21.9
16.5
19.1
22.9
19.0
and 20.0
19.8
17.9
18.1
21.7
n/a
20.6
23.0
16.5
20.6
25.7
19.0
23.4
n/a
21.1
24.8
19.9
21.1
26.4
21.6
and 20.0
and 22.1
19.8
17.9
20.8
22.0
21.0
22.2
24.6
n/a
22.0
25.8
19.9
22.0
29.3
21.6
and 22.1
22.00
21.0
24.9
1 PA92 with standard improvements to 2005 and medium cohort improvements thereafter.
2 PA92 year of birth with medium cohort improvements.
370
The mortality tables and average life expectancy at 65 used at 31 December 2006 were as follows:
Mortality table
UK .......................................................................... PA921
Hong Kong ............................................................. n/a
US .......................................................................... RP 2000 projected to
2005
Jersey ...................................................................... PA921
Mexico ................................................................... GAM83
Brazil ...................................................................... RP 2000 imp 2006
France ..................................................................... TG 05
Canada pension plans ............................................ Between UP94 C2015
Canada healthcare plan .......................................... UP94 C2025
Switzerland ............................................................ EVK2000 and
BVG2000
Germany ................................................................. Heubeck 2005 G
and UP94 C2027
Life expectancy at
age 65 for a male
member currently:
Life expectancy at
age 65 for a female
member currently:
Aged 65
Aged 45
Aged 65
Aged 45
20.3
n/a
21.6
n/a
23.3
n/a
24.6
n/a
18.7
20.3
16.6
18.9
22.8
19.0
and 20.0
19.8
17.6
and 17.8
18.1
18.7
21.6
16.6
20.5
25.6
19.0
and 20.0
19.8
17.6
and 17.8
20.8
20.9
23.3
16.6
21.0
26.3
21.6
and 22.1
22.0
20.4
and 21.1
22.2
20.9
24.6
16.6
21.9
29.1
21.6
and 22.1
22.0
20.4
and 21.1
24.9
1 PA92 with standard improvements to 2005 and medium cohort improvements thereafter.
Actuarial assumption sensitivities
The discount rate is sensitive to changes in market conditions arising during the reporting period. The mortality rates
used are sensitive to experience from the plan member profile. The following table shows the effect of changes in
these and the other key assumptions on the principal plan:
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme
2006
US$m
US$m
2007
Discount rate
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps increase .....................................................
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps decrease ....................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps increase ........................................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps decrease ........................................................................
Rate of inflation
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps increase .....................................................
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps decrease ....................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps increase ........................................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps decrease ........................................................................
Rate of increase for pensions in payment and deferred pensions
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps increase .....................................................
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps decrease ....................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps increase ........................................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps decrease ........................................................................
Rate of pay increase
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps increase .....................................................
Change in pension obligation at year end from a 25bps decrease ....................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps increase ........................................................................
Change in 2008 pension cost from a 25bps decrease ........................................................................
Mortality
Change in pension obligation from each additional year of longevity assumed ..............................
(989)
1,063
(20)
20
1,063
(989)
82
(76)
823
(758)
60
(56)
240
(231)
22
(20)
683
(1,086)
1,147
(20)
22
1,147
(1,086)
88
(77)
909
(872)
57
(55)
287
(275)
31
(27)
756
371
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 8
The following table shows the effect of changes in the discount rate and in mortality rates on plans other than the
principal plan:
Change in defined benefit obligation at year end from a 25bps increase in discount rate ...............
Change in 2008 defined benefit charge from a 25bps increase in discount rate ..............................
Increase in defined benefit obligation from each additional year of longevity assumed .................
Defined benefit pension plans
Other plans
2007
US$m
(312)
(8)
137
2006
US$m
(276)
(5)
167
The calculation of the net liability under the Group’s defined benefit pension plans is set out below together with the
expected rates of return and plan assets used to measure the net defined benefit pension costs in each subsequent year.
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme
Fair value of plan assets ...............................................
Equities .....................................................................
Bonds ........................................................................
Property ....................................................................
Other .........................................................................
Defined benefit obligation ............................................
Present value of funded obligations .........................
Present value of unfunded obligations .....................
Net liability ...................................................................
Fair value of plan assets ...............................................
Equities .....................................................................
Bonds ........................................................................
Property ....................................................................
Other .........................................................................
Defined benefit obligation ............................................
Present value of funded obligations .........................
Present value of unfunded obligations .....................
Effect of limit on plan surpluses ...................................
Unrecognised past service cost .....................................
Net liability ...................................................................
2007
Expected
rates of
return
%
8.3
6.1
7.3
5.1
2007
Expected
rates of
return1
%
8.3
5.4
7.3
5.7
2006
Expected
rates of
return
%
8.0
5.3
7.0
4.3
2006
Expected
rates of
return1
%
8.1
5.7
7.0
4.6
Value
US$m
22,704
4,580
15,341
1,878
905
(23,512)
(23,512)
–
(808)
Other plans
Value
US$m
7,768
3,439
3,452
111
766
(8,873)
(8,453)
(420)
(55)
–
(1,160)
Value
US$m
20,587
5,046
12,189
2,056
1,296
(24,332)
(24,332)
–
(3,745)
Value
US$m
7,116
3,209
3,302
138
467
(7,916)
(7,534)
(382)
(9)
1
(808)
1 The expected rates of return are weighted on the basis of the fair value of the plan assets.
Plan assets include US$86 million (2006: US$87 million) of equities issued by HSBC and US$572 million (2006:
US$188 million) of other assets issued by HSBC. The fair value of plan assets includes derivatives entered into with
the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme with a positive fair value of US$248 million at 31 December 2007 (2006:
US$273 million negative fair value) and US$63 million positive fair value (2006: US$14 million positive fair value)
in respect of The HSBC International Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme. Further details of these swap arrangements
are included in Note 44.
372
Changes in the present value of defined benefit obligations
At 1 January ..................................................................
Current service cost ......................................................
Interest cost ...................................................................
Contributions by employees .........................................
Actuarial (gains)/losses .................................................
Benefits paid .................................................................
Past service cost – vested immediately .........................
Acquisitions ..................................................................
Reduction in liabilities resulting from curtailments .....
Liabilities extinguished on settlements ........................
Exchange differences ....................................................
At 31 December ............................................................
Changes in the fair value of plan assets
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme
2006
US$m
2007
US$m
24,332
454
1,247
–
(2,395)
(632)
–
–
–
–
506
23,512
20,587
456
1,055
–
30
(696)
–
–
–
–
2,900
24,332
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme
2006
US$m
2007
US$m
At 1 January ..................................................................
Expected return on plan assets ......................................
Contributions by HSBC ................................................
– normal ....................................................................
– special ....................................................................
Contributions by employees .........................................
Experience gains ...........................................................
Benefits paid .................................................................
Assets distributed on curtailments ................................
Assets distributed on settlements ..................................
Exchange differences ....................................................
20,587
1,211
1,058
471
587
–
29
(632)
–
–
451
17,396
1,169
240
240
–
–
–
(696)
–
–
2,478
At 31 December ............................................................
22,704
20,587
Other plans
2007
US$m
7,916
347
398
37
475
(529)
6
–
(63)
(16)
302
8,873
Other plans
2007
US$m
7,116
486
211
199
12
37
157
(467)
–
(17)
245
7,768
2006
US$m
7,102
304
366
28
211
(386)
9
10
(5)
(21)
298
7,916
2006
US$m
6,356
421
193
160
33
28
203
(343)
(4)
(14)
276
7,116
The actual return on plan assets for the year ended 31 December 2007 was US$1,883 million (2006:
US$1,793 million). HSBC expects to make US$671 million of contributions to defined benefit pension plans during
2008. Benefits expected to be paid from the plans to retirees over each of the next five years, and in aggregate for the
five years thereafter, are:
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme .....................
Other significant plans ..........................................
2008
US$m
712
446
2009
US$m
726
448
2010
US$m
770
467
2011
US$m
801
504
2012
US$m
2013-2017
US$m
853
548
5,419
3,084
Total expense recognised in the income statement in ‘Employee compensation and benefits’
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme
Current service cost ....................
Interest cost .................................
Expected return on plan assets ...
Past service cost ..........................
(Gains)/losses on curtailments ....
(Gains)/losses on settlements.......
Total expense ..............................
2007
US$m
454
1,247
(1,211)
–
–
–
490
2005
US$m
383
981
(954)
–
–
–
410
2006
US$m
456
1,055
(1,169)
–
–
–
342
373
2007
US$m
347
398
(486)
7
(63)
1
204
Other plans
2006
US$m
304
366
(421)
11
–
–
260
2005
US$m
283
333
(401)
(3)
(4)
–
208
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 8
Summary
Defined benefit obligation ................................................................
Fair value of plan assets ...................................................................
Net deficit .........................................................................................
Experience gains/(losses) on plan liabilities ....................................
Experience gains on plan assets .......................................................
Gains/(losses) from changes in actuarial assumptions .....................
Total net actuarial gains/(losses) ......................................................
Defined benefit obligation ................................................................
Fair value of plan assets ...................................................................
Net deficit .........................................................................................
Experience losses on plan liabilities .................................................
Experience gains on plan assets .......................................................
Losses from changes in actuarial assumptions .................................
Total net actuarial gains/(losses) ......................................................
2007
US$m
(23,512)
22,704
(808)
(64)
29
2,459
2,424
2007
US$m
(8,873)
7,768
(1,105)
(354)
157
(121)
(318)
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme
2006
US$m
(24,332)
20,587
(3,745)
540
–
(570)
(30)
Other plans
2006
US$m
(7,916)
7,116
(800)
(167)
203
(44)
(8)
2005
US$m
(20,587)
17,396
(3,191)
70
1,623
(2,038)
(345)
2005
US$m
(7,102)
6,356
(746)
(113)
78
(393)
(428)
2004
US$m
(19,988)
15,105
(4,883)
401
506
(1,357)
(450)
2004
US$m
(6,501)
5,823
(678)
(42)
3
(243)
(282)
Actuarial gains and losses represent experience adjustments on plan assets and liabilities as well as adjustments
arising from changes in actuarial assumptions. Total cumulative actuarial gains recognised in equity at 31 December
2007 were US$563 million (2006: US$1,543 million cumulative losses).
The total effect of the limit on plan surpluses recognised within actuarial losses in equity during 2007 was a
US$42 million loss excluding exchange differences of US$4 million (2006: US$2 million loss and exchange
difference of nil).
Defined benefit healthcare plans
Fair value of plan assets ...............................................
Equities .....................................................................
Bonds ........................................................................
Defined benefit obligation ............................................
Present value of funded obligations .........................
Present value of unfunded obligations .....................
Unrecognised past service cost .....................................
Net liability ...................................................................
2007
Expected
rates of
return1
%
13.0
7.9
2006
Expected
rates of
return1
%
14.5
8.5
Value
US$m
133
40
93
(1,106)
(219)
(887)
(29)
(1,002)
Value
US$m
146
44
102
(1,038)
(191)
(847)
(33)
(925)
1 The expected rates of return are weighted on the basis of the fair value of the plan assets.
374
Changes in the present value of defined benefit obligations
At 1 January .......................................................................................................................................
Current service cost ...........................................................................................................................
Interest cost ........................................................................................................................................
Contributions by employees ..............................................................................................................
Actuarial (gains)/losses ......................................................................................................................
Benefits paid ......................................................................................................................................
Past service cost:
– vested immediately .....................................................................................................................
– unvested benefits ........................................................................................................................
Reduction in liabilities resulting from curtailments ..........................................................................
Liabilities extinguished on settlements .............................................................................................
Exchange differences .........................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
1,106
25
67
2
(109)
(54)
(2)
(2)
(42)
(2)
49
2006
US$m
1,004
19
64
2
37
(52)
1
–
(9)
(1)
41
At 31 December .................................................................................................................................
1,038
1,106
Changes in the fair value of plan assets
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
At 1 January .......................................................................................................................................
Expected return on plan assets ..........................................................................................................
Contributions by HSBC .....................................................................................................................
Experience gains/(losses) ..................................................................................................................
Benefits paid ......................................................................................................................................
Assets distributed on curtailments .....................................................................................................
Assets distributed on settlements........................................................................................................
Exchange differences .........................................................................................................................
At 31 December .................................................................................................................................
133
13
19
(6)
(11)
–
(2)
–
146
107
11
39
(1)
(20)
(1)
–
(2)
133
The actual return on plan assets for the year ended 31 December 2007 was US$7 million (2006: US$10 million).
HSBC expects to make US$18 million (2006: US$19 million) of contributions to post-employment healthcare benefit
plans during 2008. Benefits expected to be paid from the plans to retirees over each of the next five years, and in
aggregate for the five years thereafter, are:
2008
US$m
2009
US$m
2010
US$m
2011
US$m
2012
US$m
2013-2017
US$m
Significant plans .................................................
50
52
54
56
58
309
Total expense recognised in the income statement in ‘Employee compensation and benefits’
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Current service cost .........................................................................................
Interest cost ......................................................................................................
Expected return on plan assets ........................................................................
Past service cost ...............................................................................................
Losses on curtailments .....................................................................................
Losses on settlements ......................................................................................
Total expense ...................................................................................................
25
67
(13)
(4)
(42)
–
33
19
64
(11)
(1)
(8)
(1)
62
18
63
(10)
(13)
–
–
58
375
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 8 and 9
Summary
Defined benefit obligation ............................................
Fair value of plan assets ...............................................
Net deficit .....................................................................
Experience gains/(losses) on plan liabilities ................
Experience gains/(losses) on plan assets ......................
Gains/(losses) from changes in actuarial assumptions .
Total net actuarial gains/(losses) ..................................
2007
US$m
(1,038)
146
(892)
15
(6)
94
103
2006
US$m
(1,106)
133
(973)
(12)
(1)
(25)
(38)
2005
US$m
(1,004)
107
(897)
19
1
(63)
(43)
2004
US$m
(982)
79
(903)
(15)
–
20
5
Actuarial gains and losses represent experience adjustments on plan assets and liabilities as well as adjustments
arising from changes in actuarial assumptions. Total cumulative net actuarial gains recognised in equity at
31 December 2007 were US$27 million (2006: US$76 million cumulative losses).
The actuarial assumptions of the healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts recognised. A
one percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects on amounts
recognised in 2007:
2007
2006
1% increase
US$m
1% decrease
US$m
1% increase
US$m
1% decrease
US$m
Increase/(decrease) of the aggregate of the current
service cost and interest cost ......................................
Increase/(decrease) of defined benefit obligation ........
14
110
(10)
(100)
8
103
(6)
(111)
HSBC Holdings
Employee compensation and benefit expense in respect of HSBC Holdings’ employees in 2007 amounted to
US$257 million (2006: US$193 million). The average number of persons employed by HSBC Holdings during 2007
was 595 (2006: 505).
Employees of HSBC Holdings who are members of defined benefit pension plans are principally members of either
the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme or the HSBC International Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme. HSBC
Holdings pays contributions to plans in accordance with schedules determined by the Trustees following consultation
with qualified actuaries.
Directors’ emoluments
The aggregate emoluments of the Directors of HSBC Holdings, computed in accordance with Part I of Schedule 6 of
the Companies Act, were:
Fees ..................................................................................................................
Salaries and other emoluments ........................................................................
Bonuses ............................................................................................................
Gains on the exercise of share options ............................................................
Vesting of Long-Term Incentive awards .........................................................
2007
US$000
2,626
7,929
8,938
19,493
13
4,563
2006
US$000
2,660
7,774
10,705
21,139
3
18,975
2005
US$000
2,100
12,869
13,264
28,233
17
24,221
In addition, there were payments under retirement benefit agreements with former Directors of US$1,183,960 (2006:
US$996,098). The provision at 31 December 2007 in respect of unfunded pension obligations to former Directors
amounted to US$18,491,117 (2006: US$17,759,454).
During the year, aggregate contributions to pension schemes in respect of Directors were US$545,854 (2006:
US$889,241), including US$460,564 (2006: US$395,740) arising from a Director’s waiver of bonus.
Discretionary bonuses for Directors are based on a combination of individual and corporate performance and are
determined by the Remuneration Committee. Details of Directors’ remuneration, share options and conditional
376
awards under the Restricted Share Plan 2000 and The HSBC Share Plan are included in the ‘Directors’ Remuneration
Report’ on pages 322 to 332.
9 Auditors’ remuneration
Auditors’ remuneration in relation to the statutory audit amounted to US$52.3 million (2006: US$44.7 million; 2005:
US$47.0 million). The following fees were payable by HSBC to the Group’s principal auditor, KPMG Audit Plc and
its associates (together ‘KPMG’):
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2005
US$m
Audit fees for HSBC Holdings’ statutory audit1 .............................................
– fees relating to current year .....................................................................
– fees relating to prior year ........................................................................
Fees payable to KPMG for other services provided to HSBC ........................
Audit-related services:
– audit of HSBC’s subsidiaries, pursuant to legislation2 ......................
– other services pursuant to legislation3 ................................................
Tax services4 ................................................................................................
Other services:
– services relating to information technology5 ......................................
– services related to corporate finance transactions6 .............................
– all other services7 ................................................................................
Total fees payable ............................................................................................
3.0
3.0
–
79.1
45.2
19.4
2.9
0.4
1.8
9.4
82.1
2.7
2.7
–
64.1
40.4
15.4
2.0
0.6
1.6
4.1
66.8
3.0
2.8
0.2
79.6
42.5
29.2
2.6
–
0.3
5.0
82.6
1 Fees payable to KPMG Audit Plc for the statutory audit of the consolidated financial statements of HSBC and the separate financial
statements of HSBC Holdings. They exclude amounts payable for the statutory audit of HSBC Holdings’ subsidiaries which have been
included in ‘Fees payable to KPMG for other services provided to HSBC’.
2 Including fees payable to KPMG for the statutory audit of HSBC’s subsidiaries.
3 Including services for assurance and other services that relate to statutory and regulatory filings, including comfort letters and interim
reviews. Other services pursuant to legislation included fees paid to KPMG in respect of work relating to preparation for reporting
under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of US$1.6 million (2006: US$2.2 million; 2005: US$11.7 million). Other accounting firms
were paid a total of US$2.5 million (2006: US$8.3 million; 2005: US$16.7 million) for work on this project.
4 Including tax compliance services and tax advisory services.
5 Including advice on IT security and business continuity and performing agreed-upon IT testing procedures.
6 Including fees payable to KPMG for transaction-related work, including US debt issuances.
7 Including other assurance and advisory services such as translation services, ad-hoc accounting advice and review of financial models.
No fees were payable by HSBC to KPMG for the following types of services: internal audit services, valuation and
actuarial services, services related to litigation, and services related to recruitment and remuneration. The following
fees were payable by HSBC’s associated pension schemes to KPMG:
Audit fees .........................................................................................................
Tax services .....................................................................................................
All other services .............................................................................................
Total fees payable ............................................................................................
2007
US$000
2006
US$000
2005
US$000
612
14
36
662
581
23
23
627
550
17
5
572
No fees were payable by HSBC’s associated pension schemes to KPMG for the following types of services: other
services pursuant to legislation, services relating to information technology, internal audit services, valuation and
actuarial services, services related to litigation, services related to recruitment and remuneration, and services related
to corporate finance transactions.
In addition to the above, KPMG estimate they have been paid fees of US$3.4 million (2006: US$2.1 million; 2005:
US$4.5 million) by parties other than HSBC but where HSBC is connected with the contracting party and therefore
may be involved in appointing KPMG. These fees arise from services such as auditing mutual funds managed by
HSBC and reviewing the financial position of corporate concerns which borrow from HSBC.
Fees payable to KPMG for non-audit services for HSBC Holdings are not disclosed separately because such fees are
disclosed on a consolidated basis for HSBC Group.
377
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 10
10 Share-based payments
During 2007, US$870 million was charged to the income statement in respect of share-based payment transactions
settled in equity (2006: US$854 million; 2005: US$540 million). This expense, which was computed from the fair
values of the share-based payment transactions when contracted, arose under employee share awards made in
accordance with HSBC’s reward structures.
Calculation of fair values
Fair values of share options/awards, measured at the date of grant of the option/award, are calculated using a
binomial lattice model methodology that is based on the underlying assumptions of the Black-Scholes model. When
modelling options/awards with vesting dependent on HSBC’s Total Shareholder Return (‘TSR’) over a period, the
TSR performance targets are incorporated into the model using Monte Carlo simulation. The expected life of options
depends on the behaviour of option holders, which is incorporated into the option model on the basis of historic
observable data. The fair values calculated are inherently subjective and uncertain due to the assumptions made and
the limitations of the model used.
The significant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the options granted were as follows:
HSBC
Holdings
Group
Share Option
1-year
Savings-
Related
Share Option
Plan
Plan
3-year
Savings-
Related
Share Option
Plans
5-year
Savings-
Related
Share Option
Plans
The HSBC
Share Plan
2007
Risk-free interest rate1 (%) .........
Expected life2 (years) ..................
Expected volatility3 (%) ..............
Share price at grant date (£) ........
2006
Risk-free interest rate1 (%) .........
Expected life2 (years) ..................
Expected volatility3 (%) ..............
Share price at grant date (£) ........
2005
Risk-free interest rate1 (%) .........
Expected life2 (years) ..................
Expected volatility3 (%) ..............
Share price at grant date (£) ........
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4.6
7.8
20
8.30
5.6
1
17
9.24
4.7
1
17
9.54
–
–
–
–
5.5
3
17
9.24
4.8
3
17
9.54
4.3
3
20
8.68
5.4
5
17
9.24
4.7
5
17
9.54
4.3
5
20
8.68
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4.3
5
20
8.37
1 The risk-free rate was determined from the UK gilts yield curve for the HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan awards and UK
Savings-Related Share Option Plans. A similar yield curve was used for the International Savings-Related Share Option Plans.
2 Expected life is not a single input parameter but a function of various behavioural assumptions.
3 Expected volatility is estimated by considering both historic average share price volatility and implied volatility derived from traded
options over HSBC shares of similar maturity to those of the employee options.
Expected dividends are incorporated into the valuation model for options and shares, where applicable. The expected
US dollar denominated dividend growth was determined to be 10 per cent for the first 3 years (2006: 9 per cent for
first year) and 8 per cent thereafter (2006: 8 per cent), in line with consensus analyst forecasts.
The HSBC Share Plan
The HSBC Share Plan was adopted by HSBC Holdings in 2005. Under this plan, performance share awards,
restricted share awards and share option awards may be made. The aim of the HSBC Share Plan is to align the
interests of executives with the creation of shareholder value and recognise individual performance and potential.
Awards are also made under this plan for recruitment and retention purposes.
Performance share awards
Performance shares are awarded to executive Directors and other senior executives after taking into account
individual performance in the previous year. Each award is divided into two equal parts for testing attainment against
pre-determined benchmarks. One half of the award is subject to a TSR measure, based on HSBC’s ranking against a
comparator group of 28 major banks; the other half is subject to an earnings per share target. For each element of the
378
award, shares are released to the employee on a sliding scale from 30 to 100 per cent of the award, depending on the
scale of achievement against the benchmarks, providing that the minimum criteria for each performance measure has
been met and subject to the Remuneration Committee being satisfied that HSBC’s financial performance has shown a
sustained improvement in the period since the award date. The shares vest after three years to the extent that the
vesting conditions are satisfied.
Outstanding at 1 January ...................................................................................................................
Additions during the year ...................................................................................................................
Forfeited in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Outstanding at 31 December .............................................................................................................
2007
Number
(000’s)
10,367
3,263
(1,312)
12,318
2006
Number
(000’s)
5,077
5,312
(22)
10,367
The weighted average fair value of shares awarded by HSBC for performance share awards in 2007 was US$13.24
(2006: US$13.31).
Restricted share awards
Restricted shares are awarded to other employees on the basis of their performance, potential and retention
requirements, to aid recruitment or as a part-deferral of annual bonuses. Shares are awarded without corporate
performance conditions and generally vest between one and three years from the date of award, providing the
employees have remained continually employed by HSBC for this period.
Outstanding at 1 January ...................................................................................................................
Additions during the year ...................................................................................................................
Released in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Forfeited in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Outstanding at 31 December .............................................................................................................
2007
Number
(000’s)
43,420
52,790
(8,781)
(8,173)
79,256
2006
Number
(000’s)
5,106
41,440
(1,685)
(1,441)
43,420
The weighted average fair value of shares awarded by HSBC for restricted share awards in 2007 was US$17.92
(2006: US$17.65).
Share options
Share options were granted in 2005 under The HSBC Share Plan to employees in France on the basis of their
performance in the previous year. The share options are subject to the corporate performance conditions, which
consist of an absolute earnings per share measure and a TSR measure based on HSBC Holdings’ ranking against a
comparator group of 28 major banks. The options may vest after three years and are exercisable up to the tenth
anniversary of the date of grant, after which they will lapse.
Outstanding at 1 January ..............................................
Forfeited in the year ......................................................
Outstanding at 31 December ........................................
2007
2006
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
8.84
8.79
8.85
Number
(000’s)
628
(104)
524
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
8.84
–
8.84
Number
(000’s)
628
–
628
No options were granted in 2007 (2006: nil). The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding
at the balance sheet date was 2.4 years (2006: 3.3 years). The exercise price range of options outstanding at the
balance sheet date was £8.79 - £9.17. None of these options were exercisable at the balance sheet date.
379
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 10
Savings-related share option plans
Savings-related share option plans invite eligible employees to enter into savings contracts to save up to £250 per
month (or its equivalent in US dollars, Hong Kong dollars or euros), with the option to use the savings to acquire
shares. The aim of the plans is to align the interests of all employees with the creation of shareholder value. The
options are exercisable within three months following the first anniversary of the commencement of a one-year
savings contract or within six months following either the third or the fifth anniversaries of the commencement of
three-year or five-year savings contracts, respectively. The exercise price is set at a 20 per cent (2006: 20 per cent)
discount to the market value immediately preceding the date of invitation (except for the one-year options granted
under the US sub-plan where a 15 per cent discount is applied).
Outstanding at 1 January ..............................................
Granted in the year .......................................................
Exercised in the year......................................................
Forfeited in the year ......................................................
Outstanding at 31 December ........................................
2007
2006
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
6.58
7.43
6.58
6.58
6.83
Number
(000’s)
87,837
30,105
(17,951)
(10,252)
89,739
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
6.07
7.63
5.61
6.26
6.58
Number
(000’s)
98,416
22,627
(25,336)
(7,870)
87,837
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was US$4.24 (2006: US$3.45). The exercise price
range and weighted average remaining contractual life for options outstanding at the balance sheet date were as
follows:
Exercise price range (£)......................................................................................................................
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) .......................................................................
Of which exercisable:
Number (000’s) .............................................................................................................................
Weighted average exercise price (£) .............................................................................................
2007
2006
5.35 – 7.93
1.67
5.35 – 7.93
1.76
541
6.44
671
5.35
The weighted average share price at the date the share options were exercised was US$17.93 (2006: US$17.55).
HSBC Holdings Restricted Share Plan 2000
Performance share awards made under the HSBC Holdings Restricted Share Plan 2000 (the ‘Restricted Share
Plan’)
Performance share awards under the Restricted Share Plan were granted to senior executives from 2000 to 2004. The
aim of the plan was to align the interests of executives with the creation of shareholder value. This was achieved by
setting certain TSR targets against a peer group of major banks which would normally have to be attained in order for
the awards to vest. In addition to these performance conditions, none of the outstanding awards will vest unless the
Remuneration Committee is satisfied that, during the performance period, HSBC has achieved sustained growth.
Following adoption of The HSBC Share Plan in 2005, no further awards will be made under this Plan other than from
reinvested scrip dividends.
Outstanding at 1 January ...................................................................................................................
Additions during the year1 .................................................................................................................
Released in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Forfeited in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Outstanding at 31 December .............................................................................................................
1 Additions during the year comprised reinvested scrip dividends.
2007
Number
(000’s)
12,328
301
(2,332)
(5,486)
4,811
2006
Number
(000’s)
14,970
520
(3,050)
(112)
12,328
The weighted average remaining vesting period as at 31 December 2007 was 0.2 years (2006: 1.5 years).
380
Restricted share awards made under the Restricted Share Plan
Restricted share awards under the Restricted Share plan were granted to eligible employees from 2000 to 2005, after
taking into account the employees’ performance in the previous year, their potential and retention requirements.
Restricted shares were also awarded as part-deferral of annual bonuses or for recruitment purposes. Shares were
awarded without corporate performance conditions and generally vest between one and three years from the date of
award, providing the employees have remained continuously employed by HSBC for the period.
Outstanding at 1 January ...................................................................................................................
Additions during the year1 .................................................................................................................
Released in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Forfeited in the year ...........................................................................................................................
Outstanding at 31 December .............................................................................................................
1 Additions during the year comprised reinvested scrip dividends.
2007
Number
(000’s)
38,670
199
(17,156)
(2,414)
19,299
2006
Number
(000’s)
58,427
1,499
(19,224)
(2,032)
38,670
The weighted average remaining vesting period as at 31 December 2007 was 0.3 years (2006: 0.8 years).
HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan
The HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan was a long-term incentive plan under which certain HSBC employees
between 2000 and 2005 were awarded share options. The aim of the plan was to align the interests of those higher
performing employees with the creation of shareholder value. This was achieved by setting certain TSR targets which
would normally have to be attained in order for the awards to vest. Options were granted at market value and are
normally exercisable between the third and tenth anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to vesting conditions.
Options granted after May 2005 are made under The HSBC Share Plan.
Outstanding at 1 January ..............................................
Exercised in the year .....................................................
Forfeited in the year ......................................................
Outstanding at 31 December ........................................
2007
2006
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
8.09
7.64
8.02
8.15
Number
(000’s)
168,786
(8,351)
(8,222)
152,213
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
8.06
7.80
8.29
8.09
Number
(000’s)
209,982
(37,817)
(3,379)
168,786
The number of options, weighted average exercise price, and weighted average remaining contractual life of options
outstanding at the balance sheet date, analysed by exercise price range, were as follows:
2007
2006
Exercise price range (£) .................................................
6.00 – 8.00
8.01 – 10.00
6.00 – 8.00
8.01 – 10.00
Number (000’s) .............................................................
Weighted average exercise price (£) ............................
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) ...
Of which exercisable:
Number (000’s) ........................................................
Weighted average exercise price (£) ........................
29,312
6.92
5.33
29,312
6.92
122,901
8.44
5.34
61,650
8.59
34,903
6.92
4.74
34,903
6.92
131,725
8.40
7.17
66,104
8.58
The weighted average share price at the date the share options were exercised was US$18.08 (2006: US$17.65).
In 2006, after consideration of the performance and shareholder returns over the period between 2003 and 2005, the
Remuneration Committee exercised its discretion to waive the TSR performance condition in respect of the awards
made under this plan in 2003. As a result, a charge of US$135 million was recognised in 2006, reflecting the
incremental fair value granted measured at the date the performance condition was waived. This was measured using
a binomial lattice model methodology that is based on the underlying assumptions of the Black-Scholes model, as
381
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 10 and 11
described above in ‘Calculation of fair values’. A risk-free interest rate of 4.3 per cent was used, with all other inputs
to the model consistent with those used to value the other share options and awards made during 2006.
HSBC Holdings Executive Share Option Scheme
The HSBC Holdings Executive Share Option Scheme was a long-term incentive plan under which certain senior
HSBC employees were awarded share options before the adoption of the HSBC Holdings Group Share Option Plan
in 2000. The aim of the plan was to align the interests of those higher performing senior employees with the creation
of shareholder value. This was achieved by setting certain TSR targets to be attained in order for the awards to vest.
Options were granted at market value and were exercisable between the third and tenth anniversaries of the date of
grant, subject to vesting conditions. No awards have been made under this plan since 2000 and the remaining
unexercised options are summarised below:
Outstanding at 1 January ..............................................
Exercised in the year .....................................................
Forfeited in the year ......................................................
Outstanding at 31 December ........................................
2007
2006
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
6.82
6.65
6.84
6.85
Number
(000’s)
22,037
(3,377)
(421)
18,239
Weighted
average
exercise
price
£
6.78
6.69
5.94
6.82
Number
(000’s)
32,255
(9,767)
(451)
22,037
The weighted average share price at the date the share options were exercised was US$18.08 (2006: US$17.65).
The number of options, weighted average exercise price and weighted average remaining contractual life of options
outstanding at the balance sheet date, analysed by exercise price range, were as follows:
Exercise price range (£) ......................................................................................
6.01 – 7.87
2.17 – 6.00
6.01 – 7.87
Number (000’s) ...................................................................................................
Weighted average exercise price (£) ..................................................................
Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) ........................................
Of which exercisable:
Number (000’s) ..............................................................................................
Weighted average exercise price (£) ..............................................................
18,239
6.85
1.66
18,239
6.85
188
5.02
–
188
5.02
21,849
6.84
2.64
21,849
6.84
2007
2006
HSBC France and subsidiary company plans
Before its acquisition by HSBC in 2000, HSBC France and certain of its subsidiaries operated employee share plans
under which share options were granted over their respective shares.
Options over HSBC France shares granted between 1994 and 1999 vested upon announcement of HSBC’s agreement
to acquire HSBC France and were therefore included in the valuation of HSBC France.
HSBC France granted 909,000 options in 2000 after the public announcement of the acquisition and these options did
not vest as a result of the change in control. The options were subject to continued employment and vested on
1 January 2002. The HSBC France shares obtained on exercise of the options are exchangeable for HSBC’s ordinary
shares of US$0.50 each in the same ratio as the Exchange Offer for HSBC France shares (13 ordinary shares of
US$0.50 for each HSBC France share). Options were granted at market value and are exercisable within 10 years of
the date of grant.
Outstanding at 1 January ..............................................
Exercised in the year .....................................................
Outstanding and exercisable at 31 December ..............
2007
2006
Number
(000’s)
646
(44)
602
Exercise
price
€
142.5
142.5
142.5
Number
(000’s)
766
(120)
646
Exercise
price
€
142.5
142.5
142.5
The remaining contractual life for options outstanding at the balance sheet date was 2.3 years (2006: 3.3 years).
382
The weighted average share price at the date the share options were exercised was US$18.08 (2006: US$17.64).
At the date of its acquisition in 2000, certain of HSBC France’s subsidiary companies also operated employee share
option plans under which options could be granted over their respective shares. On exercise of certain of these
options, the subsidiary shares are exchanged for HSBC ordinary shares. The total number of HSBC ordinary shares
exchanged under such arrangements in 2007 was 113,240 (2006: 356,491).
HSBC Finance Corporation
Upon acquisition, HSBC Finance share options previously granted were converted to share options over HSBC
ordinary shares of US$0.50 each at a rate of 2.675 HSBC share options (the same ratio as the Exchange Offer for
HSBC Finance) for each HSBC Finance share option. Options granted under HSBC Finance’s own share option
schemes prior to the announcement of the acquisition by HSBC in November 2002 vested as options over HSBC
shares upon acquisition by HSBC. Options granted after the announcement of the acquisition in November 2002 but
prior to its completion on 28 March 2003 generally vest equally over four years and expire ten years from the date of
grant.
Information with respect to share options granted under HSBC Finance’s pre-acquisition scheme is as follows:
HSBC Finance share options outstanding
at 1 January ...............................................................
Exercised in the year .....................................................
Forfeited in the year ......................................................
Outstanding and exercisable at 31 December ..............
2007
2006
Number
(000’s)
3,126
(671)
–
2,455
Exercise
price
US$
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
Number
(000’s)
6,358
(3,219)
(13)
3,126
Exercise
price
US$
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
The remaining contractual life for options outstanding at the balance sheet date was 4.9 years (2006: 5.9 years). The
weighted average share price at the date the share options were exercised was US$18.08 (2006: US$17.65).
11 Tax expense
Current tax
UK corporation tax charge – on current year profit ........................................
UK corporation tax charge – adjustments in respect of prior years ................
Overseas tax – on current year profit ..............................................................
Overseas tax – adjustments in respect of prior years ......................................
Deferred tax
Origination and reversal of temporary differences .........................................
Effect of changes in tax rates ...........................................................................
Adjustments in respect of prior years ..............................................................
Tax expense .....................................................................................................
2007
US$m
1,372
(46)
3,976
(97)
5,205
(1,247)
(35)
(166)
(1,448)
3,757
2006
US$m
772
(122)
4,600
(48)
5,202
(51)
–
64
13
5,215
2005
US$m
663
29
4,103
(110)
4,685
506
8
(106)
408
5,093
The UK corporation tax rate applying to HSBC Holdings and its subsidiaries was 30 per cent (2006: 30 per cent;
2005: 30 per cent). Overseas tax included Hong Kong profits tax of US$1,137 million (2006: US$751 million; 2005:
US$639 million). Subsidiaries in Hong Kong provided for Hong Kong profits tax at the rate of 17.5 per cent (2006:
17.5 per cent; 2005: 17.5 per cent) on the profits for the year assessable in Hong Kong. Other overseas subsidiaries
and overseas branches provided for taxation at the appropriate rates in the countries in which they operate.
383
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 11
The following table reconciles the tax expense which would apply if all profits had been taxed at the UK
corporation tax rate:
Analysis of tax expense
Taxation at UK corporation tax rate of
30% (2006 and 2005: 30% ) ..................
7,264
30.0
6,626
30.0
6,290
30.0
2007
US$m
%
2006
US$m
%
2005
US$m
%
Effect of taxing overseas profits in
principal locations at different rates .......
Tax-free gains .............................................
Adjustments in respect of prior period
liabilities ..................................................
Low income housing tax credits1 ...............
Effect of profit in associates and joint
ventures ..................................................
Effect of previously unrecognised
temporary differences2 ...........................
Release of deferred tax consequent on
restructuring of Group interests .............
Impact of gains arising from dilution of
interests in associates3 ............................
Other items ..................................................
(1,460)
(296)
(309)
(107)
(450)
(485)
(359)
(253)
212
Overall tax expense ....................................
3,757
(6.0)
(1.2)
(1.3)
(0.4)
(1.9)
(2.0)
(1.5)
(1.0)
0.8
15.5
(568)
(199)
(106)
(108)
(2.6)
(0.9)
(0.5)
(0.5)
(342)
(220)
(187)
(110)
(1.6)
(1.0)
(0.9)
(0.5)
(253)
(1.1)
(193)
(0.9)
(122)
(0.6)
(147)
(0.8)
–
–
(55)
–
–
(0.2)
–
–
2
–
–
–
5,215
23.6
5,093
24.3
1 Low income housing tax credits arise in the US and are designed to encourage the provision of rental housing for low income
households.
2 The effect of previously unrecognised temporary differences principally relates to the recognition of capital losses.
3 The gains arising from the dilution of HSBC’s interests in associates are not subject to tax and, as such, there is a reconciling item
which reduces the effective tax rate (see note 21).
In addition to the amount charged to the income statement, the aggregate amount of current and deferred tax,
relating to items that are taken directly to total equity, was a US$226 million reduction in total equity (2006:
US$44 million reduction in total equity; 2005: US$437 million increase in total equity).
The 2007 Finance Act reduction in the UK corporation tax rate from 30 per cent to 28 per cent, enacted in 2007 but
commencing in 2008, resulted in a one off re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities. It gave rise to a credit
to the Group’s tax charge of US$28 million.
Deferred taxation
HSBC
At 1 January .......................................................................................................................................
Income statement credit/(charge) ......................................................................................................
Equity:
– available-for-sale investments ........................................................................................................
– cash flow hedges .............................................................................................................................
– share-based payments .....................................................................................................................
– actuarial gains and losses ...............................................................................................................
Foreign exchange and other adjustments ..........................................................................................
At 31 December .................................................................................................................................
Asset ..................................................................................................................................................
Liability ..............................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
2,145
1,448
(8)
470
(65)
(642)
77
3,425
5,284
(1,859)
3,425
2006
US$m
2,135
(13)
(2)
321
(42)
(324)
70
2,145
3,241
(1,096)
2,145
384
The amount of deferred taxation accounted for in the Group balance sheet, before netting off balances within
countries, comprised the following deferred tax liabilities and assets:
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
Deferred tax assets
Retirement benefits ............................................................................................................................
Loan impairment allowances .............................................................................................................
Unused tax losses ...............................................................................................................................
Accelerated capital allowances ..........................................................................................................
Available-for-sale investments ..........................................................................................................
Cash flow hedges ...............................................................................................................................
Share-based payments .......................................................................................................................
Other short term timing differences ...................................................................................................
Other timing differences ....................................................................................................................
Deferred tax liabilities
Assets leased to customers ................................................................................................................
Revaluation of property .....................................................................................................................
Accelerated capital allowances ..........................................................................................................
Other short-term timing differences ..................................................................................................
Provision for tax on profit remitted from overseas ...........................................................................
Available-for-sale investments ..........................................................................................................
Cash flow hedges ...............................................................................................................................
Other timing differences ....................................................................................................................
Net deferred tax asset/(liability) ........................................................................................................
822
4,484
272
97
77
570
326
900
–
7,548
1,285
507
206
202
102
198
96
1,527
4,123
3,425
After netting off balances within countries, the balances as disclosed in the accounts are as follows:
Deferred tax assets .............................................................................................................................
Deferred tax liabilities .......................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
5,284
(1,859)
3,425
1,599
2,775
180
91
–
139
194
462
80
5,520
1,676
469
171
–
112
384
34
529
3,375
2,145
2006
US$m
3,241
(1,096)
2,145
The amount of temporary differences for which no deferred tax asset is recognised in the balance sheet is
US$923 million (2006: US$1,067 million). Of this amount, US$750 million (2006: US$876 million) has no expiry
date and US$173 million (2006: US$191 million) is scheduled to expire within 10 years.
Deferred tax is not recognised in respect of the Group’s investments in subsidiaries, branches, associates and interests
in joint ventures where remittance is not contemplated or where no additional tax is expected to arise. The aggregate
amount of temporary differences associated with such investments is US$29,947 million (2006: US$22,424 million;
2005: US$15,367 million).
HSBC Holdings
Temporary differences:
– short-term timing differences .........................................................................................................
– fair valued assets and liabilities ......................................................................................................
– share-based payments .....................................................................................................................
Deferred tax asset/(liability)
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
1
(14)
20
7
1
10
24
35
385
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 12, 13 and 14
12 Dividends
Dividends to shareholders of the parent company were as follows:
2007
2006
2005
Per
share
US$
Total
US$m
Settled
in scrip
US$m
Per
share
US$
Total
US$m
Settled
in scrip
US$m
Per
share
US$
Total
US$m
Settled
in scrip
US$m
Dividends declared on ordinary shares
In respect of previous year:
– fourth interim dividend .......................
0.360
4,161
2,116
0.310
3,513
1,542 0.270
3,007
431
In respect of current year:
– first interim dividend ...........................
– second interim dividend ......................
– third interim dividend ..........................
0.170
0.170
0.170
1,986
1,997
2,007
712
912
614
0.150
0.150
0.150
1,712
1,724
1,730
248 0.140
515 0.140
223 0.140
1,563
1,574
1,585
677
311
392
0.870 10,151
4,354
0.760
8,679
2,528 0.690
7,729
1,811
Quarterly dividends on preference
share capital
March dividend ...........................................
June dividend...............................................
September dividend .....................................
December dividend......................................
15.50
15.50
15.50
15.50
62.00
22
23
22
23
90
15.50
15.50
15.50
15.50
62.00
22
23
22
23
90
–
–
–
14.29
14.29
–
–
–
21
21
The Directors declared after the end of the year a fourth interim dividend in respect of the financial year ended
31 December 2007 of US$0.39 per ordinary share, a distribution of US$4,628 million. The fourth interim dividend
will be payable on 7 May 2008 to shareholders on the Register at the close of business on 25 March 2008. No
liability is recorded in the financial statements in respect of the fourth interim dividend for 2007.
13 Earnings per share
Basic earnings per ordinary share was calculated by dividing the earnings of US$19,043 million (2006:
US$15,699 million; 2005: US$15,060 million) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, excluding own
shares held, outstanding in 2007 of 11,545 million (2006: 11,210 million; 2005: 11,038 million).
Profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company ..............................
Dividend payable on preference shares classified as equity ...........................
Profit attributable to the ordinary shareholders of the parent company ..........
2007
US$m
19,133
(90)
19,043
2006
US$m
15,789
(90)
15,699
2005
US$m
15,081
(21)
15,060
Diluted earnings per ordinary share was calculated by dividing the basic earnings, which require no adjustment for
the effects of dilutive potential ordinary shares (including share options outstanding not yet exercised), by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding, excluding own shares held, plus the weighted average
number of ordinary shares that would be issued on ordinary conversion of dilutive potential ordinary shares in 2007
of 11,661 million (2006: 11,320 million; 2005: 11,171 million). The effect of dilutive share options and share awards
on the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue was as follows:
386
Average number of shares in issue ..................................................................
Dilutive share options and share awards .........................................................
– Savings-related Share Option Plan ...........................................................
– Executive Share Option Scheme ..............................................................
– Group Share Option Plan .........................................................................
– Restricted and performance share awards ................................................
– HSBC France share options .....................................................................
– HSBC Finance share options ...................................................................
Average number of shares in issue assuming dilution ....................................
Number of shares (millions)
2007
11,545
116
20
5
16
67
5
3
11,661
2006
11,210
110
27
10
28
32
8
5
11,320
2005
11,038
133
22
11
14
70
10
6
11,171
Of the total number of employee share options and share awards existing at 31 December 2007, 19 million were anti-
dilutive (2006: 20 million; 2005: 121 million).
14 Segmental analysis
In the following segmental analysis, the benefit of shareholders’ funds impacts the analysis only to the extent that
these funds are actually allocated to businesses in the segment by way of intra-HSBC capital and funding structures.
By geographical region
Geographical information is classified by the location of the principal operations of the subsidiary, or, for The
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, HSBC Bank, HSBC Bank Middle East, HSBC Finance and HSBC
Bank USA, by the location of the branch responsible for reporting the results or advancing the funds. Due to the
nature of HSBC’s structure, the analysis of profits shown below includes intra-HSBC items between geographical
regions with the elimination shown in a separate column. The Rest of Asia-Pacific geographical segment includes the
Middle East, India and Australasia. Shared costs are included in segments on the basis of the actual recharges made.
Total assets
Europe ..............................................................................................................
Hong Kong .......................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .........................................................................................
North America .................................................................................................
Latin America ..................................................................................................
Total liabilities
Europe ..............................................................................................................
Hong Kong .......................................................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific .........................................................................................
North America .................................................................................................
Latin America ..................................................................................................
At 31 December 2007
US$m
1,184,315
332,691
228,112
510,092
99,056
%
50.3
14.1
9.7
21.7
4.2
At 31 December 2006
US$m
%
828,701
272,428
167,668
511,190
80,771
44.6
14.6
9.0
27.5
4.3
2,354,266
100.0
1,860,758
100.0
At 31 December 2007
US$m
1,126,508
317,316
210,499
478,323
86,204
%
50.7
14.3
9.5
21.6
3.9
At 31 December 2006
US$m
%
778,635
258,028
161,388
477,310
70,469
44.7
14.8
9.2
27.3
4.0
2,218,850
100.0
1,745,830
100.0
387
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 14
Profit before tax
Europe
US$m
Interest income ............................
Interest expense ..........................
33,144
(25,398)
Net interest income .....................
7,746
Fee income ..................................
Fee expense .................................
10,973
(2,542)
Net fee income ............................
8,431
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income .
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense) .....
Net income from financial
instruments designated at
fair value .................................
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Gains arising from dilution of
interests in associates .............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
3,003
3,940
6,943
1,226
1,326
–
171
4,010
1,193
Hong
Kong
US$m
12,580
(7,097)
5,483
3,860
(498)
3,362
1,270
(28)
1,242
676
94
–
31
2,797
845
Year ended 31 December 2007
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
10,158
(6,015)
4,143
2,709
(463)
2,246
1,202
441
1,643
111
38
1,081
8
226
798
30,183
(15,336)
14,847
6,733
(923)
5,810
(1,289)
747
(542)
1,750
245
–
105
449
360
9,471
(3,895)
5,576
2,647
(494)
2,153
272
276
548
320
253
11
9
1,594
228
Total operating income ............
31,046
14,530
10,294
23,024
10,692
Intra-
HSBC
items
US$m
(3,177)
3,177
–
(585)
585
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(1,985)
(1,985)
Total
US$m
92,359
(54,564)
37,795
26,337
(4,335)
22,002
4,458
5,376
9,834
4,083
1,956
1,092
324
9,076
1,439
87,601
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..........................
Net operating income before
loan impairment charges
and other credit risk
provisions ..............................
Loan impairment charges and
(3,479)
(3,208)
(253)
(241)
(1,427)
–
(8,608)
27,567
11,322
10,041
22,783
9,265
(1,985)
78,993
other credit risk provisions .....
(2,542)
(231)
Net operating income1 ..............
25,025
11,091
(616)
9,425
(12,156)
10,627
(1,697)
7,568
–
(17,242)
(1,985)
61,751
Total operating expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortisation) ...........................
Depreciation of property, plant
and equipment ........................
Amortisation of intangible
assets .......................................
(848)
(226)
Total operating expenses ..........
(16,525)
Operating profit ........................
8,500
Share of profit in associates and
joint ventures ..........................
Profit before tax ........................
Other disclosures:
Capital expenditure incurred2 .....
Investment in associates and
joint ventures ..........................
1 Net operating income:
95
8,595
1,722
158
(15,451)
(3,510)
(4,572)
(10,037)
(5,043)
1,985
(36,628)
(180)
(90)
(3,780)
7,311
28
7,339
441
155
(159)
(33)
(317)
(202)
(4,764)
(10,556)
4,661
1,348
6,009
277
9,867
71
20
91
833
127
(210)
(149)
(5,402)
2,166
12
2,178
599
77
–
–
(1,714)
(700)
1,985
(39,042)
–
–
–
–
–
22,709
1,503
24,212
3,872
10,384
External ..................................
Inter-segment ..........................
23,772
1,253
10,168
923
8,456
969
11,784
(1,157)
7,571
(3)
–
(1,985)
61,751
–
2 Expenditure incurred on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
388
Interest income ............................
Interest expense ..........................
Net interest income .....................
Fee income ..................................
Fee expense .................................
Net fee income ............................
Trading income excluding net
interest income ........................
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income .....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums ..
Other operating income ..............
Europe
US$m
25,249
(16,960)
8,289
9,583
(2,475)
7,108
2,842
1,687
4,529
144
624
183
1,298
1,428
Hong
Kong
US$m
11,097
(6,412)
4,685
2,448
(392)
2,056
924
(307)
617
260
162
61
2,628
834
Year ended 31 December 2006
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
7,693
(4,646)
3,047
1,912
(290)
1,622
935
246
27,959
(13,691)
14,268
5,611
(845)
4,766
617
741
1,181
1,358
79
41
5
174
765
(63)
58
85
492
922
7,289
(3,092)
4,197
1,975
(345)
1,630
301
236
537
237
84
6
1,076
91
7,858
Intra-
HSBC
items
US$m
(3,408)
3,408
–
(449)
449
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(1,494)
(1,494)
Total
US$m
75,879
(41,393)
34,486
21,080
(3,898)
17,182
5,619
2,603
8,222
657
969
340
5,668
2,546
70,070
Total operating income ...............
23,603
11,303
6,914
21,886
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..........................
Net operating income before loan
impairment charges
and other credit risk provisions
Loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ..............
Net operating income1 ................
Total operating expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortisation) ...........................
Depreciation of property, plant
and equipment ........................
Amortisation of intangible
assets .......................................
(762)
(298)
Total operating expenses ............
(13,871)
Operating profit ..........................
7,046
Share of profit/(loss) in
associates and joint ventures ..
(72)
Profit before tax ..........................
6,974
Other disclosures:
Capital expenditure incurred2 .....
Investment in associates and
joint ventures ..........................
1,508
1,321
1 Net operating income:
(531)
(2,699)
(192)
(259)
(1,023)
–
(4,704)
23,072
8,604
6,722
21,627
6,835
(1,494)
65,366
(2,155)
20,917
(172)
8,432
(512)
6,210
(6,796)
14,831
(938)
5,897
–
(10,573)
(1,494)
54,793
(12,811)
(3,002)
(3,412)
(9,669)
(3,923)
1,494
(31,323)
(171)
(96)
(3,269)
5,163
19
5,182
324
128
(124)
(12)
(284)
(240)
(3,548)
(10,193)
2,662
4,638
865
3,527
235
6,322
30
4,668
899
541
(173)
(70)
(4,166)
1,731
4
1,735
2,017
84
–
–
(1,514)
(716)
1,494
(33,553)
–
–
–
–
–
21,240
846
22,086
4,983
8,396
External ..................................
Inter-segment ..........................
19,664
1,253
7,970
462
5,592
618
15,694
(863)
5,873
24
–
(1,494)
54,793
–
2 Expenditure incurred on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
389
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 14
Europe
US$m
Interest income ............................
Interest expense ..........................
21,023
(12,802)
Net interest income .....................
8,221
Fee income ..................................
Fee expense .................................
8,081
(1,782)
Net fee income ............................
6,299
Trading income excluding net
interest income .......................
1,660
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
1,376
Net trading income .....................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
3,036
362
439
63
1,599
1,603
Total operating income ...............
21,622
Hong
Kong
US$m
7,419
(3,355)
4,064
1,967
(293)
1,674
773
(227)
546
(6)
108
41
2,334
805
9,566
Year ended 31 December 2005
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
5,673
(3,261)
2,412
1,619
(279)
1,340
753
107
860
58
18
5
155
335
22,189
(8,894)
13,295
4,605
(653)
3,952
250
635
885
434
47
41
477
642
6,133
(2,791)
3,342
1,481
(290)
1,191
220
317
537
186
80
5
871
286
5,183
19,773
6,498
Intra-
HSBC
items
US$m
(2,343)
2,343
–
(267)
267
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(938)
(938)
Total
US$m
60,094
(28,760)
31,334
17,486
(3,030)
14,456
3,656
2,208
5,864
1,034
692
155
5,436
2,733
61,704
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..........................
Net operating income before
loan impairment charges and
other credit risk provisions .....
Loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ..............
Net operating income1 ................
Total operating expenses
(excluding depreciation and
amortisation) ...........................
Depreciation of property, plant
and equipment ........................
Amortisation of intangible
assets .......................................
(912)
(234)
Total operating expenses ............
(12,639)
Operating profit ..........................
6,236
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ..........................
Other disclosures:
Capital expenditure incurred2 .....
Investment in associates and
joint ventures ..........................
1 Net operating income:
120
6,356
1,892
1,733
(818)
(2,059)
(166)
(232)
(792)
–
(4,067)
20,804
7,507
5,017
19,541
5,706
(938)
57,637
(1,929)
18,875
(146)
7,361
(134)
4,883
(4,916)
14,625
(676)
5,030
–
(938)
(7,801)
49,836
(11,493)
(2,586)
(2,648)
(8,276)
(3,263)
938
(27,328)
(168)
(113)
(2,867)
4,494
23
4,517
249
108
(107)
(7)
(2,762)
2,121
453
2,574
(307)
(175)
(8,758)
5,867
48
5,915
191
1,826
5,362
43
(138)
(25)
(3,426)
1,604
–
1,604
315
3
–
–
(1,632)
(554)
938
(29,514)
–
–
–
–
–
20,322
644
20,966
4,473
7,249
External ..................................
Inter-segment ..........................
18,300
575
7,001
360
4,636
247
14,860
(235)
5,039
(9)
–
(938)
49,836
–
2 Expenditure incurred on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
390
By customer group
HSBC’s operations include a number of shared support services and head office functions. The costs of these
functions are allocated to customer groups, where appropriate, on a systematic and consistent basis. In addition, a
number of income and expense items include the effect of financial transactions entered into in the ordinary course of
business between customer groups co-operating within the integrated HSBC Group. The following analysis includes
inter-segment amounts within each customer group with the elimination shown in a separate column.
Profit before tax
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
29,069
Net fee income/(expense) ...........
11,742
9,055
3,972
Trading income excluding net
interest income ........................
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income ......................
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
38
140
178
1,333
investments .............................
351
Gains arising from dilution in
interests in associates ..............
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums ..
Other operating income ..............
–
55
8,271
387
265
31
296
22
90
–
8
733
165
Year ended 31 December 2007
Global
Banking
& Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
4,430
4,901
3,503
(236)
3,267
1,216
1,615
525
9
534
(542)
(228)
127
(1)
126
(164)
(1)
2,893
1,313
–
222
93
1,218
119
83
–
7
–
58
1,092
32
(21)
3,523
6,958
Intra-
HSBC
items
US$m
(5,433)
–
–
5,433
5,433
–
–
–
–
–
(3,912)
Total
US$m
37,795
22,002
4,458
5,376
9,834
4,083
1,956
1,092
324
9,076
1,439
(3,912)
87,601
Total operating income ............
51,386
14,341
15,280
3,548
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..........................
(8,147)
(391)
(70)
–
–
–
Net operating income1 ...............
43,239
13,950
15,210
3,548
6,958
(3,912)
(8,608)
78,993
Loan impairment charges and other
credit risk provisions ..............
Net operating income2 ..............
(16,172)
27,067
(1,007)
12,943
Operating expenses .....................
(21,757)
(6,252)
Operating profit ........................
5,310
6,691
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ........................
590
5,900
454
7,145
(38)
15,172
(9,358)
5,814
307
6,121
(14)
3,534
(2,025)
1,509
2
1,511
(11)
–
(17,242)
6,947
(3,912)
61,751
(3,562)
3,912
(39,042)
3,385
150
3,535
–
–
–
–
22,709
1,503
24,212
3,872
Capital expenditure incurred3 .....
1,335
527
942
73
995
1 Net operating income before loan impairment charges and other credit risk provisions.
2 Net operating income:
External ..................................
Inter-segment ..........................
21,059
6,008
11,442
1,501
23,595
(8,423)
2,144
1,390
3,511
3,436
–
(3,912)
61,751
–
3 Expenditure incurred on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
391
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 14 and 15
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Year ended 31 December 2006
Global
Banking
& Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
26,076
Net fee income ............................
8,762
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income .
391
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense) .....
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums .
Other operating income ..............
220
611
739
78
31
5,130
782
7,514
3,207
204
20
224
(22)
44
6
258
250
3,168
3,718
4,890
(379)
4,511
20
534
235
73
1,378
1,011
1,323
362
2
364
1
166
5
–
61
Total operating income ...............
42,209
11,481
13,637
2,931
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..........................
(4,365)
(96)
(62)
–
Net operating income1 .................
37,844
11,385
13,575
2,931
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
(9,949)
(697)
119
Net operating income2 ................
27,895
10,688
13,694
Operating expenses .....................
(18,818)
(4,979)
Operating profit/(loss) ................
9,077
5,709
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit/(loss) before tax ................
380
9,457
288
5,997
(7,991)
5,703
103
5,806
(33)
2,898
(1,685)
1,213
1
1,214
Intra-
HSBC
items
US$m
(2,658)
–
–
2,658
2,658
Total
US$m
34,486
17,182
5,619
2,603
8,222
(625)
172
(228)
82
(146)
(81)
–
657
147
63
207
3,254
2,991
–
–
–
(3,179)
969
340
5,668
2,546
(3,179)
70,070
(181)
2,810
–
(3,179)
(4,704)
65,366
(13)
–
(10,573)
2,797
(3,179)
54,793
(3,259)
3,179
(33,553)
(462)
74
(388)
–
–
–
–
21,240
846
22,086
4,983
Capital expenditure incurred3 .....
2,150
1,083
1,021
45
684
1 Net operating income before loan impairment (charges)/recoveries and other credit risk provisions.
2 Net operating income:
External ..................................
Inter-segment ..........................
23,238
4,657
9,692
996
20,034
(6,340)
1,661
1,237
168
2,629
–
(3,179)
54,793
–
3 Expenditure incurred on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
392
Personal
Financial
Services
US$m
Commercial
Banking
US$m
Year ended 31 December 2005
Global
Banking
& Markets
US$m
Private
Banking
US$m
Other
US$m
Net interest income/(expense) ....
23,351
Net fee income ............................
7,313
6,310
2,876
Trading income/(expense)
excluding net interest income .
Net interest income/(expense)
on trading activities ................
Net trading income/(expense) .....
Net income/(expense) from
financial instruments
designated at fair value ...........
Gains less losses from financial
investments .............................
Dividend income .........................
Net earned insurance premiums ..
Other operating income ..............
360
214
574
574
19
16
4,864
729
150
(3)
147
(12)
9
9
236
327
3,001
2,967
2,919
306
3,225
67
475
79
76
1,621
848
1,080
317
–
317
(1)
45
9
–
68
Total operating income ...............
37,440
9,902
11,511
2,366
(472)
220
(90)
(13)
(103)
406
144
42
260
2,634
3,131
Intra-
HSBC
items
US$m
(1,704)
–
–
1,704
1,704
–
–
–
–
(2,646)
(2,646)
Total
US$m
31,334
14,456
3,656
2,208
5,864
1,034
692
155
5,436
2,733
61,704
Net insurance claims incurred
and movement in liabilities to
policyholders ..........................
Net operating income1 ................
Loan impairment (charges)/
recoveries and other credit
risk provisions ........................
Net operating income2 ................
(7,537)
26,187
Operating expenses .....................
(16,427)
Operating profit/(loss) ................
9,760
Share of profit in associates
and joint ventures ...................
Profit before tax ..........................
Capital expenditure incurred3 .....
144
9,904
1,583
(3,716)
33,724
(118)
9,784
(54)
11,457
–
2,366
(179)
2,952
–
(2,646)
(4,067)
57,637
(547)
9,237
(4,453)
4,784
177
4,961
411
272
11,729
(6,838)
4,891
272
5,163
1,783
12
2,378
(1,466)
912
–
912
102
(1)
2,951
(2,976)
(25)
51
26
594
–
(2,646)
(7,801)
49,836
2,646
(29,514)
–
–
–
–
20,322
644
20,966
4,473
1 Net operating income before loan impairment (charges)/recoveries and other credit risk provisions.
2 Net operating income:
External ..................................
Inter-segment ..........................
25,000
1,187
8,258
979
13,998
(2,269)
1,668
710
912
2,039
–
(2,646)
49,836
–
3 Expenditure incurred on property, plant and equipment and intangible assets.
Total assets
Personal Financial Services .............................................................................
Commercial Banking .......................................................................................
Global Banking and Markets ...........................................................................
Private Banking ...............................................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
At 31 December 2007
US$m
588,473
261,893
1,375,240
88,510
40,150
%
25.0
11.1
58.4
3.8
1.7
At 31 December 2006
US$m
%
546,568
213,450
994,436
73,026
33,278
29.4
11.5
53.5
3.9
1.7
Total assets .......................................................................................................
2,354,266
100.0
1,860,758
100.0
15 Analysis of financial assets and liabilities by measurement basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities are measured on an ongoing basis either at fair value or at amortised cost. The
summary of significant accounting policies in Note 2 describes how the classes of financial instruments are measured,
and how income and expenses, including fair value gains and losses, are recognised. The following table analyses the
carrying amounts of the financial assets and liabilities by category as defined in IAS 39 and by balance sheet heading.
393
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 15
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
d
n
a
s
t
e
s
s
a
7
0
0
2
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3
t
A
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
s
a
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
s
a
t
a
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
-
e
l
b
a
l
i
a
v
A
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
d
e
s
i
t
r
o
m
a
e
l
a
s
-
r
o
f
d
n
a
s
n
a
o
L
-
o
t
-
d
l
e
H
y
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
D
r
o
f
d
l
e
H
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
t
s
o
c
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
s
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
g
n
i
d
a
r
t
C
B
S
H
l
a
t
o
T
m
$
S
U
5
6
7
,
1
2
7
7
7
,
9
3
9
8
,
3
1
8
6
9
,
5
4
4
4
6
5
,
1
4
4
5
8
,
7
8
1
6
6
3
,
7
3
2
8
4
5
,
1
8
9
0
0
0
,
3
8
2
6
2
1
,
5
2
1
9
0
,
0
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5
1
9
,
4
5
3
3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
5
9
,
7
6
2
,
2
5
1
9
,
4
5
3
3
3
9
8
,
3
1
1
8
1
,
2
3
1
0
4
1
,
6
9
0
,
1
2
7
6
,
8
0
8
5
,
4
1
3
9
3
9
,
9
8
3
9
3
,
3
8
1
9
7
5
,
6
4
2
2
9
8
,
2
3
2
7
5
,
9
1
9
1
8
,
4
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1
8
9
,
1
3
0
4
0
6
6
,
2
6
1
,
2
1
8
9
,
1
3
0
4
5
5
8
,
0
6
5
,
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7
7
7
,
9
5
6
7
,
1
2
4
8
0
,
5
2
1
9
0
,
0
2
7
1
7
,
6
7
–
2
7
6
,
8
1
8
1
,
2
3
1
0
4
1
,
6
9
0
,
1
–
–
–
2
9
8
,
2
3
2
7
5
,
9
1
9
1
8
,
4
2
9
7
5
,
6
4
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
2
2
3
2
,
3
7
2
–
–
–
–
–
3
9
8
,
3
1
6
6
3
,
7
3
2
8
4
5
,
1
8
9
–
–
4
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
6
7
,
9
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
l
a
r
t
n
e
c
t
a
s
e
c
n
a
l
a
b
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
r
e
h
t
o
m
o
r
f
n
o
i
t
c
e
l
l
o
c
f
o
e
s
r
u
o
c
e
h
t
n
i
s
m
e
t
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
s
e
n
d
e
t
b
e
d
n
i
f
o
s
e
t
a
c
i
f
i
t
r
e
c
t
n
e
m
n
r
e
v
o
G
g
n
o
K
g
n
o
H
8
6
9
,
5
4
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
g
n
i
d
a
r
T
4
6
5
,
1
4
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
–
–
–
–
–
–
4
0
6
,
2
8
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c
o
t
o
t
s
e
c
n
a
v
d
a
d
n
a
s
n
a
o
L
s
e
c
n
a
v
d
a
d
n
a
s
n
a
o
L
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
u
r
c
c
A
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
0
6
2
,
3
7
2
1
2
8
,
2
3
2
,
1
8
6
7
,
9
4
6
5
,
1
4
2
7
5
,
8
2
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
l
a
t
o
T
394
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
3
9
8
,
3
1
3
9
8
,
3
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
i
t
a
l
u
c
r
i
c
n
i
s
e
t
o
n
y
c
n
e
r
r
u
c
g
n
o
K
g
n
o
H
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
y
b
s
t
i
s
o
p
e
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
r
e
h
t
o
o
t
n
o
i
s
s
i
m
s
n
a
r
t
f
o
e
s
r
u
o
c
e
h
t
n
i
s
m
e
t
I
0
8
5
,
4
1
3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
g
n
i
d
a
r
T
9
3
9
,
9
8
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
–
–
–
–
–
9
0
0
,
1
8
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
s
s
i
n
i
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
t
b
e
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
l
a
u
r
c
c
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
d
e
t
a
n
i
d
r
o
b
u
S
9
3
9
,
9
8
9
8
5
,
5
9
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
l
a
t
o
T
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
d
n
a
s
t
e
s
s
a
6
0
0
2
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3
t
A
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
t
s
o
c
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
d
e
s
i
t
r
o
m
a
m
$
S
U
e
l
a
s
-
r
o
f
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
s
a
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
s
a
t
a
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
-
e
l
b
a
l
i
a
v
A
m
$
S
U
d
n
a
s
n
a
o
L
s
e
l
b
a
v
i
e
c
e
r
m
$
S
U
-
o
t
-
d
l
e
H
y
t
i
r
u
t
a
m
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
m
$
S
U
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
D
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
g
n
i
d
a
r
t
m
$
S
U
r
o
f
d
l
e
H
C
B
S
H
l
a
t
o
T
m
$
S
U
2
3
7
,
2
1
4
4
1
,
4
1
5
6
1
,
3
1
7
4
1
,
8
2
3
3
7
5
,
0
2
2
0
7
,
3
0
1
5
0
2
,
5
8
1
3
3
1
,
8
6
8
6
0
8
,
4
0
2
5
0
3
,
3
2
5
3
7
,
2
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9
4
7
,
3
1
0
2
7
4
6
,
6
8
7
,
1
9
4
7
,
3
1
0
2
5
6
1
,
3
1
4
9
6
,
9
9
5
2
6
,
2
1
4
3
8
,
6
9
8
8
0
6
,
6
2
2
1
1
2
,
0
7
8
7
4
,
1
0
1
5
2
3
,
0
3
2
6
7
6
,
5
2
7
5
0
,
5
1
2
7
6
,
2
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
3
7
3
,
1
5
1
3
5
4
3
,
4
1
7
,
1
3
7
3
,
1
5
1
3
3
8
8
,
2
0
3
,
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
3
7
,
2
1
4
4
1
,
4
1
5
0
3
,
3
2
5
3
7
,
2
1
6
1
9
,
2
6
–
4
9
6
,
9
9
4
3
8
,
6
9
8
5
2
6
,
2
1
–
–
–
6
7
6
,
5
2
7
5
0
,
5
1
2
7
6
,
2
2
5
2
3
,
0
3
2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5
6
1
,
3
1
5
0
2
,
5
8
1
3
3
1
,
8
6
8
–
–
5
3
4
,
5
9
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1
7
3
,
9
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
l
a
r
t
n
e
c
t
a
s
e
c
n
a
l
a
b
d
n
a
h
s
a
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
r
e
h
t
o
m
o
r
f
n
o
i
t
c
e
l
l
o
c
f
o
e
s
r
u
o
c
e
h
t
n
i
s
m
e
t
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
s
e
n
d
e
t
b
e
d
n
i
f
o
s
e
t
a
c
i
f
i
t
r
e
c
t
n
e
m
n
r
e
v
o
G
g
n
o
K
g
n
o
H
7
4
1
,
8
2
3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
g
n
i
d
a
r
T
3
7
5
,
0
2
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
–
–
–
–
–
–
2
5
7
,
9
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
o
t
s
e
c
n
a
v
d
a
d
n
a
s
n
a
o
L
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
c
o
t
s
e
c
n
a
v
d
a
d
n
a
s
n
a
o
L
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
e
v
n
i
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
m
o
c
n
i
d
e
u
r
c
c
A
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
5
3
4
,
5
9
1
3
0
5
,
6
6
0
,
1
1
7
3
,
9
3
7
5
,
0
2
9
9
8
,
7
2
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
e
s
s
a
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
l
a
t
o
T
395
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5
6
1
,
3
1
5
6
1
,
3
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
i
t
a
l
u
c
r
i
c
n
i
s
e
t
o
n
y
c
n
e
r
r
u
c
g
n
o
K
g
n
o
H
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
y
b
s
t
i
s
o
p
e
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
r
e
m
o
t
s
u
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
k
n
a
b
r
e
h
t
o
o
t
n
o
i
s
s
i
m
s
n
a
r
t
f
o
e
s
r
u
o
c
e
h
t
n
i
s
m
e
t
I
8
0
6
,
6
2
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
g
n
i
d
a
r
T
1
1
2
,
0
7
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
t
a
d
e
t
a
n
g
i
s
e
d
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
–
–
–
–
–
0
9
7
,
9
9
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
u
s
s
i
n
i
s
e
i
t
i
r
u
c
e
s
t
b
e
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
l
a
u
r
c
c
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
d
e
t
a
n
i
d
r
o
b
u
S
1
1
2
,
0
7
8
9
3
,
6
2
3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
l
a
t
o
T
s
e
i
t
i
l
i
b
a
i
l
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 15 and 16
HSBC Holdings
At 31 December 2007
Held for
trading
US$m
Designated
at fair value
US$m
Loans and
receivables
US$m
Financial
assets and
liabilities at
amortised
cost
US$m
Available-
for-sale
securities
US$m
–
2,660
–
–
–
2,660
–
–
44
–
–
–
44
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
17,242
–
–
17,242
–
18,683
–
–
–
–
18,683
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
3,022
–
3,022
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
360
–
–
–
21
381
2,969
–
–
8,544
5
150
11,668
At 31 December 2006
Held for
trading
US$m
Designated
at fair value
US$m
Loans and
receivables
US$m
–
1,599
–
–
–
1,599
–
–
177
–
–
–
177
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
14,456
–
–
14,456
–
14,070
–
–
–
–
14,070
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Financial
assets and
liabilities at
amortised
cost
US$m
Available-
for-sale
securities
US$m
–
–
–
3,614
–
3,614
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
729
–
–
–
25
754
3,100
–
–
8,423
1
111
11,635
Total
US$m
360
2,660
17,242
3,022
21
23,305
2,969
18,683
44
8,544
5
150
30,395
Total
US$m
729
1,599
14,456
3,614
25
20,423
3,100
14,070
177
8,423
1
111
25,882
Financial assets
Cash at bank and in hand ....................................
Derivatives ..........................................................
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings ......
Financial investments .........................................
Other assets .........................................................
Total financial assets ..........................................
Financial liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ..............
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .......
Derivatives ..........................................................
Subordinated liabilities .......................................
Other liabilities ...................................................
Accruals ..............................................................
Total financial liabilities .....................................
Financial assets
Cash at bank and in hand ....................................
Derivatives ..........................................................
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings ......
Financial investments .........................................
Other assets .........................................................
Total financial assets ..........................................
Financial liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ..............
Financial liabilities designated at fair value .......
Derivatives ..........................................................
Subordinated liabilities .......................................
Other liabilities ...................................................
Accruals ..............................................................
Total financial liabilities .....................................
396
16 Trading assets
Trading assets:
– not subject to repledge or resale by counterparties ........................................................................
– which may be repledged or resold by counterparties .....................................................................
Treasury and other eligible bills ........................................................................................................
Debt securities ...................................................................................................................................
Equity securities .................................................................................................................................
Loans and advances to banks ............................................................................................................
Loans and advances to customers ......................................................................................................
2007
US$m
308,286
137,682
445,968
16,439
178,834
51,476
246,749
100,440
98,779
445,968
The following table provides an analysis of trading securities which are valued at fair value:
US Treasury and US Government agencies ......................................................................................
UK Government .................................................................................................................................
Hong Kong Government ...................................................................................................................
Other government ..............................................................................................................................
Asset-backed securities ......................................................................................................................
Corporate debt and other securities ...................................................................................................
Equity securities .................................................................................................................................
Fair value
2007
US$m
17,335
11,607
5,517
80,268
20,479
60,067
51,476
2006
US$m
273,507
54,640
328,147
21,759
155,447
27,149
204,355
52,006
71,786
328,147
2006
US$m
8,348
6,176
8,759
70,747
15,781
67,395
27,149
Included within the above figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of US$69,818 million (2006:
US$36,153 million).
The following table analyses trading securities between those listed on a recognised exchange and those that are
unlisted:
246,749
204,355
Fair value at 31 December 2007
Listed on a recognised exchange1 .................................
Unlisted .........................................................................
Fair value at 31 December 2006
Listed on a recognised exchange1 .................................
Unlisted .........................................................................
Treasury
and other
eligible bills
US$m
34
16,405
16,439
1,373
20,386
21,759
Debt
securities
US$m
115,593
63,241
178,834
112,403
43,044
155,447
Equity
securities
US$m
50,092
1,384
51,476
25,337
1,812
27,149
1 Included within listed investments are US$6,977 million (2006: US$4,309 million) of investments listed in Hong Kong.
Loans and advances to banks held for trading consist of:
Reverse repos .....................................................................................................................................
Settlement accounts ...........................................................................................................................
Stock borrowing .................................................................................................................................
Other ..................................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
80,476
8,227
8,259
3,478
100,440
Total
US$m
165,719
81,030
246,749
139,113
65,242
204,355
2006
US$m
41,475
4,655
4,727
1,149
52,006
397
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 17 and 18
All of the above loans and advances to banks are graded satisfactorily by reference to the Group’s legacy credit risk
grading system.
Loans and advances to customers held for trading consist of:
Reverse repos .....................................................................................................................................
Stock borrowing ................................................................................................................................
Settlement accounts ...........................................................................................................................
Other ..................................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
51,543
24,254
6,216
16,766
98,779
2006
US$m
32,869
18,591
9,998
10,328
71,786
Of the above loans and advances to customers, US$97,492 million (2006: US$71,680 million) are rated satisfactorily,
US$343 million (2006: nil) as watch list and special mention, US$269 million (2006: US$62 million) as substandard
and US$675 million (2006: US$44 million) as impaired.
17 Financial assets designated at fair value
Treasury and other eligible bills ........................................................................................................
Debt securities ...................................................................................................................................
Equity securities ................................................................................................................................
Loans and advances to banks ............................................................................................................
Loans and advances to customers .....................................................................................................
Securities designated at fair value
US Treasury and US Government agencies ......................................................................................
UK Government .................................................................................................................................
Hong Kong Government ...................................................................................................................
Other government ..............................................................................................................................
Asset-backed securities .....................................................................................................................
Corporate debt and other securities ...................................................................................................
Equities ..............................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
181
21,150
20,047
41,378
178
8
41,564
Market value
2007
US$m
252
788
314
4,427
8,114
7,436
20,047
41,378
Included within the above figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of US$14,401 million (2006:
US$2,438 million).
Fair value at 31 December 2007
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ................................
Unlisted .........................................................................
Fair value at 31 December 2006
Listed on a recognised exchange1 ................................
Unlisted .........................................................................
Treasury
and other
eligible bills
US$m
Debt
securities
US$m
Equity
securities
US$m
50
131
181
133
–
133
8,659
12,491
21,150
4,939
4,510
9,449
15,449
4,598
20,047
9,212
1,390
10,602
1 Included within listed investments are US$1,502 million of investments listed in Hong Kong (2006: US$1,014 million).
2006
US$m
133
9,449
10,602
20,184
236
153
20,573
2006
US$m
92
1,359
216
2,131
274
5,510
10,602
20,184
Total
US$m
24,158
17,220
41,378
14,284
5,900
20,184
398
18 Derivatives
Fair values of derivatives by product contract type held by HSBC
At 31 December 2007
Foreign exchange ................................................
Interest rate .........................................................
Equities ...............................................................
Credit derivatives ................................................
Commodity and other .........................................
Gross total fair values .........................................
Netting ................................................................
Total ....................................................................
At 31 December 2006
Foreign exchange ................................................
Interest rate .........................................................
Equities ...............................................................
Credit derivatives ................................................
Commodity and other .........................................
Gross total fair values .........................................
Netting ................................................................
Total ....................................................................
Trading
US$m
52,018
83,982
20,229
25,268
1,107
182,604
Trading
US$m
30,648
52,664
10,767
8,237
1,304
103,620
Assets
Hedging
US$m
3,490
1,759
1
–
–
5,250
Assets
Hedging
US$m
2,399
1,551
–
–
–
3,950
Trading
US$m
Liabilities
Hedging
US$m
50,608
83,374
19,458
26,247
1,322
181,009
371
2,013
–
–
–
2,384
Trading
US$m
28,837
52,927
11,647
8,611
1,636
103,658
Liabilities
Hedging
US$m
394
1,287
7
–
–
1,688
Total
US$m
55,508
85,741
20,230
25,268
1,107
187,854
–
187,854
Total
US$m
33,047
54,215
10,767
8,237
1,304
107,570
(3,868)
103,702
Total
US$m
50,979
85,387
19,458
26,247
1,322
183,393
–
183,393
Total
US$m
29,231
54,214
11,654
8,611
1,636
105,346
(3,868)
101,478
Fair values of derivatives by product contract type held by HSBC Holdings with subsidiaries
Foreign exchange ..........................................................
Interest rate ...................................................................
Gross total fair values ...................................................
Year ended 31 December
2007
Trading
Assets
US$m
2,381
279
2,660
Liabilities
US$m
2
42
44
2006
Trading
Assets
US$m
1,557
42
1,599
Liabilities
US$m
–
177
177
Derivatives are financial instruments that derive their value from the price of underlying items such as equities,
bonds, interest rates, foreign exchange, credit spreads, commodities and equity or other indices. Derivatives enable
users to increase, reduce or alter exposure to credit or market risks. HSBC makes markets in derivatives for its
customers and uses derivatives to manage its exposure to credit and market risks.
Derivatives are carried at fair value and shown in the balance sheet as separate totals of assets and liabilities. Asset
values represent the cost to HSBC of replacing all transactions with a fair value in HSBC’s favour assuming that all
HSBC’s relevant counterparties default at the same time, and that transactions can be replaced instantaneously.
Liability values represent the cost to HSBC’s counterparties of replacing all their transactions with HSBC with a fair
value in their favour if HSBC were to default. Derivative assets and liabilities on different transactions are only set
off if the transactions are with the same counterparty, a legal right of set-off exists and the cash flows are intended to
be settled on a net basis.
Use of derivatives
HSBC transacts derivatives for three primary purposes: to create risk management solutions for clients, for
proprietary trading purposes, and to manage and hedge HSBC’s own risks. Derivatives (except for derivatives which
are designated as effective hedging instruments as defined in IAS 39) are held for trading. The held for trading
classification includes two types of derivatives: those used in sales and trading activities, and those used for risk
399
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 18
management purposes but which for various reasons do not meet the qualifying criteria for hedge accounting. The
second category includes derivatives managed in conjunction with financial instruments designated at fair value.
These activities are described more fully below.
HSBC’s derivative activities give rise to significant open positions in portfolios of derivatives. These positions are
managed constantly to ensure that they remain within acceptable risk levels, with matching deals being utilised to
achieve this where necessary. When entering into derivative transactions, HSBC employs the same credit risk
management procedures to assess and approve potential credit exposures that are used for traditional lending.
Derivative assets with a carrying amount of US$123,041 million or 65.5 per cent of the total carrying amount (2006:
US$67,628 million; 65.2 per cent) are held with banking counterparties, and US$46,789 million or 24.9 per cent of
the total carrying amount (2006: US$26,811 million; 25.9 per cent) with other financial institutions. The remainder
are held with government and other counterparties.
Trading derivatives
Most of HSBC’s derivative transactions relate to sales and trading activities. Sales activities include the structuring
and marketing of derivative products to customers to enable them to take, transfer, modify or reduce current or
expected risks. Trading activities in derivatives are entered into principally for the purpose of generating profits from
short-term fluctuations in price or margin. Positions may be traded actively or be held over a period of time to benefit
from expected changes in exchange rates, interest rates, equity prices or other market parameters. Trading includes
market-making, positioning and arbitrage activities. Market-making entails quoting bid and offer prices to other
market participants for the purpose of generating revenues based on spread and volume; positioning means managing
market risk positions in the expectation of benefiting from favourable movements in prices, rates or indices; arbitrage
involves identifying and profiting from price differentials between markets and products.
As mentioned above, other derivatives classified as held for trading include non-qualifying hedging derivatives,
ineffective hedging derivatives and the components of hedging derivatives that are excluded from assessing hedge
effectiveness. Non-qualifying hedging derivatives are entered into for risk management purposes but do not meet the
criteria for hedge accounting. These include derivatives managed in conjunction with financial instruments
designated at fair value.
Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are reported in
‘Net trading income’, except for derivatives managed in conjunction with financial instruments designated at fair
value, where gains and losses are reported in ‘Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value’,
together with the gains and losses on the hedged items. Changes in the fair values of trading derivatives are inclusive
of contractual interest. Changes in the fair value of derivatives managed in conjunction with financial instruments
designated at fair value are included in ‘Net income from financial instruments designated at fair value’ inclusive of
contractual interest unless the derivatives are managed with debt securities in issue, in which case the contractual
interest is shown in interest payable with the interest payable on the issued debt. Substantially all of HSBC Holdings’
derivatives entered into with HSBC undertakings are managed in conjunction with financial liabilities designated at
fair value.
Notional contract amounts of derivatives held for trading purposes by product type
HSBC
2007
US$m
Foreign exchange ..........................................................
Interest rate ...................................................................
Equities .........................................................................
Credit derivatives ..........................................................
Commodity and other ...................................................
3,243,738
10,672,971
286,927
1,893,802
33,188
2006
US$m
2,182,005
9,843,601
207,016
1,109,828
30,532
16,130,626
13,372,982
HSBC Holdings
2007
US$m
12,790
7,804
–
–
–
20,594
2006
US$m
9,869
5,304
–
–
–
15,173
Credit derivatives
HSBC trades credit derivatives through its principal dealing operations and acts as a principal counterparty to a broad
range of users, structuring deals to produce risk management products for its customers, or making markets in certain
400
products. Risk is typically controlled through entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts with other
counterparties.
HSBC manages the credit risk arising on buying and selling credit derivative protection by including the related
credit exposures within its overall credit limit structure for the relevant counterparty. Trading of credit derivatives is
restricted to a small number of offices within the major centres which have the control infrastructure and market
skills to manage effectively the credit risk inherent in the products.
Credit derivatives are also deployed to a limited extent for the risk management of the Group’s loan portfolios.
The contract amount of credit derivatives of US$1,893,802 million (2006: US$1,109,828 million) consisted
of protection bought of US$926,794 million (2006: US$540,229 million) and protection sold of US$967,008 million
(2006: US$569,599 million).
The difference between these notional amounts is attributable to HSBC selling protection on large, diversified,
predominantly investment grade portfolios (including the most senior tranches) and then hedging these positions by
buying protection on the more subordinated tranches of the same portfolios. In addition, HSBC uses securities to
hedge certain derivative positions. Consequently, while there is a mismatch in notional amounts of credit derivatives
bought and sold this should not be interpreted as representing the open risk position. The credit derivative business
operates within the market risk management framework described from page 248.
Derivatives valued using models with unobservable inputs
The amount that has yet to be recognised in the consolidated income statement relating to the difference between the
fair value at initial recognition (the transaction price) and the amount that would have arisen had valuation techniques
used for subsequent measurement been applied at initial recognition, less subsequent releases, is as follows:
Unamortised balance at 1 January .....................................................................................................
Deferral on new transactions .............................................................................................................
Recognised in the income statement during the period:
– amortisation ................................................................................................................................
– subsequent to unobservable inputs becoming observable .........................................................
– maturity, termination or offsetting derivative ............................................................................
Exchange differences .........................................................................................................................
Risk hedged .......................................................................................................................................
Unamortised balance at 31 December ...............................................................................................
2007
US$m
214
384
(85)
(83)
(121)
4
(7)
306
2006
US$m
252
283
(59)
(226)
(53)
17
–
214
Hedging instruments
HSBC uses derivatives (principally interest rate swaps) for hedging purposes in the management of its own asset and
liability portfolios and structural positions. This enables HSBC to optimise the overall cost to the Group of accessing
debt capital markets, and to mitigate the market risk which would otherwise arise from structural imbalances in the
maturity and other profiles of its assets and liabilities.
The accounting treatment of hedge transactions varies according to the nature of the instrument hedged and the type
of hedge transactions. Derivatives may qualify as hedges for accounting purposes if they are fair value hedges, cash
flow hedges, or investment hedges. These are described under the relevant headings below:
Notional contract amounts of derivatives held for hedging purposes by product type
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
Foreign exchange ..........................................................
Interest rate ...................................................................
Equities .........................................................................
Fair value
hedge
US$m
3,116
34,897
24
38,037
Cash flow
hedge
US$m
21,765
201,635
–
223,400
Fair value
hedge
US$m
2,985
24,279
30
27,294
Cash flow
hedge
US$m
21,641
248,134
–
269,775
401
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 18 and 19
With respect to exchange rate and interest rate contracts, the notional contract amounts of these instruments indicate
the nominal value of transactions outstanding at the balance sheet date; they do not represent amounts at risk.
Fair value hedges
HSBC’s fair value hedges principally consist of interest rate swaps that are used to protect against changes in the fair
value of fixed-rate long-term financial instruments due to movements in market interest rates. For qualifying fair
value hedges, all changes in the fair value of the derivative and in the fair value of the item in relation to the risk
being hedged are recognised in the income statement. If the hedge relationship is terminated, the fair value
adjustment to the hedged item continues to be reported as part of the basis of the item and is amortised to the income
statement as a yield adjustment over the remainder of the hedging period.
Fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges
At 31 December 2007
Fair value
At 31 December 2006
Fair value
Foreign exchange ..........................................................
Interest rate ...................................................................
Equities .........................................................................
Gains or losses arising from fair value hedges
Assets
US$m
163
171
1
335
Liabilities
US$m
65
338
–
403
Gains/(losses):
– on hedging instruments .............................................................................................................
– on the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk .................................................................
Assets
US$m
28
173
–
201
2007
US$m
(186)
205
19
Liabilities
US$m
113
195
7
315
2006
US$m
8
8
16
The gains and losses on ineffective portions of fair value hedges are recognised immediately in ‘Net trading income’.
Cash flow hedges
HSBC’s cash flow hedges consist principally of interest rate and cross-currency swaps that are used to protect against
exposures to variability in future interest cash flows on non-trading assets and liabilities which bear interest at
variable rates or which are expected to be re-funded or reinvested in the future. The amounts and timing of future
cash flows, representing both principal and interest flows, are projected for each portfolio of financial assets and
liabilities on the basis of their contractual terms and other relevant factors, including estimates of prepayments and
defaults. The aggregate principal balances and interest cash flows across all portfolios over time form the basis for
identifying gains and losses on the effective portions of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges of forecast
transactions. Gains and losses are initially recognised directly in equity, in the cash flow hedging reserve, and are
transferred to the income statement when the forecast cash flows affect the income statement.
Fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
Foreign exchange ..........................................................
Interest rate ...................................................................
At 31 December 2007
Fair value
At 31 December 2006
Fair value
Assets
US$m
3,327
1,588
4,915
Liabilities
US$m
306
1,675
1,981
Assets
US$m
2,371
1,378
3,749
Liabilities
US$m
281
1,083
1,364
402
The schedule of forecast principal balances on which the expected interest cash flows arise as at 31 December 2007 is
as follows:
At 31 December 2007
Assets ............................................................................
Liabilities ......................................................................
Net cash inflows/(outflows) exposure ..........................
At 31 December 2006
Assets ............................................................................
Liabilities ......................................................................
Net cash outflows exposure ..........................................
3 months
or less
US$m
More than 3
months but less
than 1 year
US$m
5 years or less
but more than
1 year
US$m
More than
5 years
US$m
90,575
(89,891)
684
61,649
(96,852)
(35,203)
78,215
(77,389)
826
51,471
(91,868)
(40,397)
36,952
(68,189)
(31,237)
22,271
(60,712)
(38,441)
227
(5,955)
(5,728)
496
(8,093)
(7,597)
This table reflects the interest rate repricing profile of the underlying hedged items.
The gains and losses on ineffective portions of such derivatives are recognised immediately in ‘Net trading income’.
During the year to 31 December 2007, a loss of US$77 million (2006: US$122 million) was recognised due to hedge
ineffectiveness.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
HSBC’s consolidated balance sheet is affected by exchange differences between the US dollar and all the non-US
dollar functional currencies of subsidiaries. HSBC hedges structural foreign exchange exposures only in limited
circumstances. Hedging is undertaken using forward foreign exchange contracts which are accounted for as hedges of
a net investment in a foreign operation, or by financing with borrowings in the same currencies as the functional
currencies involved.
At 31 December 2007, the fair values of outstanding financial instruments designated as hedges of net investments in
foreign operations were liabilities of US$450 million (2006: US$254 million) and notional contract values of
US$1,204 million (2006: US$995 million).
The ineffectiveness recognised in ‘Net trading income’ in the year ended 31 December 2007 that arose from hedges
in foreign operations was nil (2006: nil).
19 Financial investments
Financial investments:
– not subject to repledge or resale by counterparties ...................................................................
– which may be repledged or resold by counterparties ...............................................................
2007
US$m
271,126
11,874
283,000
Treasury and other eligible bills ...................................
– available-for-sale ..................................................
– held-to-maturity ....................................................
Debt securities ..............................................................
– available-for-sale ..................................................
– held-to-maturity ....................................................
Equity securities ............................................................
– available-for-sale ..................................................
2007
2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
30,104
30,104
–
240,302
230,534
9,768
12,594
12,594
Fair
value
US$m
30,104
30,104
–
240,688
230,534
10,154
12,594
12,594
Carrying
amount
US$m
25,313
25,268
45
171,196
161,870
9,326
8,297
8,297
2006
US$m
197,055
7,751
204,806
Fair
value
US$m
25,313
25,268
45
171,498
161,870
9,628
8,297
8,297
Total financial investments ...........................................
283,000
283,386
204,806
205,108
403
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 19
At 31 December 2007
US Treasury .......................................................................................................................................
US Government agencies ..................................................................................................................
US Government sponsored entities ...................................................................................................
UK Government .................................................................................................................................
Hong Kong Government ...................................................................................................................
Other government ..............................................................................................................................
Asset-backed securities .....................................................................................................................
Corporate debt and other securities ...................................................................................................
Equities ..............................................................................................................................................
At 31 December 2006
US Treasury .......................................................................................................................................
US Government agencies ..................................................................................................................
US Government sponsored entities ...................................................................................................
UK Government .................................................................................................................................
Hong Kong Government ...................................................................................................................
Other government ..............................................................................................................................
Asset-backed securities .....................................................................................................................
Corporate debt and other securities ...................................................................................................
Equities ..............................................................................................................................................
At 31 December 2005
US Treasury .......................................................................................................................................
US Government agencies ..................................................................................................................
US Government sponsored entities ...................................................................................................
UK Government .................................................................................................................................
Hong Kong Government ...................................................................................................................
Other government ..............................................................................................................................
Asset-backed securities .....................................................................................................................
Corporate debt and other securities ...................................................................................................
Equities ..............................................................................................................................................
Amortised
cost
US$m
6,799
5,709
14,732
757
3,941
60,109
66,172
112,969
8,405
279,593
10,219
6,004
14,010
7,515
1,085
37,828
26,752
93,217
6,295
Fair
value
US$m
6,831
5,732
14,533
749
3,942
60,320
65,962
112,723
12,594
283,386
10,203
5,968
13,799
7,502
1,080
38,198
26,750
93,311
8,297
202,925
205,108
9,015
4,173
16,099
7,658
4,429
34,623
2,893
96,018
6,414
8,997
4,173
15,889
7,740
4,408
34,853
2,889
96,055
7,519
181,322
182,523
Included within the above figures are debt securities issued by banks and other financial institutions of
US$142,863 million (2006: US$86,649 million). The fair value of these was US$143,023 million (2006:
US$86,596 million).
Carrying amount at 31 December 2007
Listed on a recognised exchange ........................
Unlisted ...............................................................
Carrying amount at 31 December 2006
Listed on a recognised exchange ........................
Unlisted ...............................................................
Treasury
and other
eligible bills
available-
for-sale
US$m
Treasury
and other
eligible bills
held-to-
maturity
US$m
Debt
securities
available-
for-sale
US$m
Debt
securities
held-to-
maturity
US$m
Equity
securities
US$m
Total
US$m
1,062
29,042
30,104
1,861
23,407
25,268
–
–
–
45
–
45
107,059
123,475
230,534
58,216
103,654
161,870
3,399
6,369
9,768
3,590
5,736
9,326
3,301
9,293
114,821
168,179
12,594
283,000
2,937
5,360
8,297
66,649
138,157
204,806
The fair value of listed held-to-maturity debt securities as at 31 December 2007 was US$3,469 million (2006:
US$3,663 million). Included within listed investments were US$2,066 million (2006: US$1,179 million) of
investments listed in Hong Kong.
404
The maturities of investment securities at carrying amount are analysed as follows:
Remaining contractual maturity of total debt securities:
1 year or less ..................................................................................................................................
5 years or less but over 1 year .......................................................................................................
10 years or less but over 5 years ...................................................................................................
over 10 years ..................................................................................................................................
80,979
76,306
34,175
48,842
At 31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
63,932
55,145
12,015
40,104
Remaining contractual maturity of debt securities available for sale:
1 year or less ..................................................................................................................................
5 years or less but over 1 year .......................................................................................................
10 years or less but over 5 years ...................................................................................................
over 10 years ..................................................................................................................................
Remaining contractual maturity of debt securities held to maturity:
1 year or less ..................................................................................................................................
5 years or less but over 1 year .......................................................................................................
10 years or less but over 5 years ...................................................................................................
over 10 years ..................................................................................................................................
240,302
171,196
80,498
74,279
30,607
45,150
63,382
53,497
8,827
36,164
230,534
161,870
481
2,027
3,568
3,692
9,768
550
1,648
3,188
3,940
9,326
The following table provides an analysis of contractual maturities and weighted average yields of investment debt
securities as at 31 December 2007:
Within one year
Amount Yield
%
US$m
After one year but
within five years
Amount Yield
%
US$m
After five years but
within ten years
Amount Yield
%
US$m
After ten years
Amount Yield
%
US$m
111
320
3.43
3.27
164
76
3.86
3.56
1
84
6.86
4.84
404
48
185
21,340
6,781
3.23
–
2.99
5.47
5.57
550
–
78
13,725
13,625
5.53
–
3.07
5.58
5.46
1,254
–
186
3,657
17,475
3.43
–
4.90
3.91
5.62
–
4,700
10,663
–
–
2,453
28,292
–
5.20
5.35
–
–
4.26
5.65
Available-for-sale
US Treasury ...................................
US Government agencies ..............
US Government-sponsored
agencies .....................................
UK Government .............................
Hong Kong Government ...............
Other governments .........................
Asset-backed securities ..................
Corporate debt and other
securities ....................................
51,187
5.00
41,092
4.31
7,025
4.92
5,836
5.14
Total amortised cost .......................
Total carrying value .......................
80,376
80,498
69,310
74,279
29,682
30,607
51,944
45,150
Held-to-maturity
US Treasury ...................................
US Government agencies ..............
US Government-sponsored
agencies .....................................
Hong Kong Government ...............
Other governments .........................
Corporate debt and other
securities ....................................
Total amortised cost .......................
Total carrying value .......................
2
1
5.80
7.80
–
–
100
–
–
4.86
35
3
5.71
–
8
21
147
7.08
4.76
5.44
33
7
69
–
75
4.48
8.16
6.03
–
4.26
67
518
1,784
8
616
5.08
6.41
5.89
4.82
7.08
378
3.95
1,813
4.74
3,384
4.55
699
4.95
481
481
2,027
2,027
3,568
3,568
3,692
3,692
The maturity distributions of asset-backed securities are presented in the above table based upon contractual maturity
dates. The weighted average yield for each range of maturities in the above table is calculated by dividing the
annualised interest income for the year ended 31 December 2007 by the book amount of available-for-sale debt
securities at that date. The yields do not include the effect of related derivatives.
405
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 20 and 21
20 Securitisations and other structured transactions
HSBC enters into transactions in the normal course of business by which it transfers recognised financial assets
directly to third parties or to SPEs. These transfers may give rise to the full or partial derecognition of the financial
assets concerned.
–
–
Full derecognition occurs when HSBC transfers its contractual right to receive cash flows from the financial
assets, or retains the right but assumes an obligation to pass on the cash flows from the asset, and transfers
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership. The risks include credit, interest rate, currency, prepayment
and other price risks.
Partial derecognition occurs when HSBC sells or otherwise transfers financial assets in such a way that some but
not substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred but control is retained. These financial
assets are recognised on the balance sheet to the extent of HSBC’s continuing involvement.
The majority of financial assets that do not qualify for derecognition are (i) debt securities held by counterparties as
collateral under repurchase agreements or (ii) equity securities lent under securities lending agreements. The
following table analyses the carrying amount of financial assets that did not qualify for derecognition and their
associated financial liabilities:
Nature of transaction
Repurchase agreements ................................................
Securities lending agreements ......................................
2007
2006
Carrying
amount of
transferred
assets
US$m
126,534
24,087
150,621
Carrying
amount of
associated
liabilities
US$m
126,111
23,304
149,415
Carrying
amount of
transferred
assets
US$m
67,558
12,908
80,466
Carrying
amount of
associated
liabilities
US$m
66,127
12,469
78,596
A small proportion of financial assets that do not qualify for derecognition relate to loans, credit cards, debt securities
and trade receivables that have been securitised under arrangements by which HSBC retains a continuing
involvement in such transferred assets. Continuing involvement may entail retaining the rights to future cash flows
arising from the assets after investors have received their contractual terms (for example, interest rate strips);
providing subordinated interest; liquidity support; continuing to service the underlying asset; or entering into
derivative transactions with the securitisation vehicles. As such, HSBC continues to be exposed to risks associated
with these transactions.
The rights and obligations that HSBC retains from its continuing involvement in securitisations are initially recorded
as an allocation of the fair value of the financial asset between the part that is derecognised and the part that continues
to be recognised on the date of transfer. The following analyses the carrying amount of financial assets to the extent
of HSBC’s continuing involvement that qualified for partial derecognition during the year, and their associated
liabilities:
Carrying amount of assets (original) .................................................................................................
Carrying amount of assets (currently recognised) .............................................................................
Carrying amount of associated liabilities (currently recognised) .....................................................
Securitisations at 31 December
2007
US$m
17,713
598
299
2006
US$m
20,095
599
306
406
21 Interests in associates and joint ventures
Principal associates of HSBC
At 31 December 2007
Carrying
amount
US$m
3,957
69
683
3,790
5
1,082
9,586
Fair
value
US$m
12,992
206
4,538
13,232
101
5,719
36,788
Listed
Bank of Communications Co., Limited ........................
Financiera Independencia S.A. de C.V.2 ......................
Industrial Bank Company Limited1 ..............................
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of
China, Limited ..........................................................
SABB Takaful Company ..............................................
The Saudi British Bank Limited ...................................
1 Listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on 5 February 2007.
2 Listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange on 31 October 2007.
At 31 December 2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
Fair
value
US$m
2,710
–
–
2,037
–
978
5,725
11,065
–
–
6,825
–
4,700
22,590
Issued
equity
capital
At 31 December 2007
HSBC’s
interest in
equity capital
Country of
incorporation
Listed
PRC1
Bank of Communications Co., Limited ...............................................................
Mexico
Financiera Independencia S.A. de C.V. ..............................................................
PRC1
Industrial Bank Company Limited3 .....................................................................
PRC1
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Limited ...................................
SABB Takaful Company ..................................................................................... Saudi Arabia
The Saudi British Bank Limited .......................................................................... Saudi Arabia
Unlisted
Barrowgate Limited2,3...........................................................................................
British Arab Commercial Bank Limited .............................................................
Hong Kong
England
Vietnam
Vietnam Technological and Commercial Joint Stock Bank ...............................
VocaLink .............................................................................................................
England
Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A4 ................................................................. United States
1 People’s Republic of China.
2 Issued equity capital is less than HK$1 million.
3 Investment held through Hang Seng Bank Limited, a 62.14 per cent owned subsidiary of HSBC.
4 Issued equity capital is less than US$1 million.
19.01%
18.68%
12.78%
16.78%
32.50%
40.00%
RMB45,804m
MXP154m
RMB5,000m
RMB7,345m
SR100m
SR3,750m
24.64%
46.51%
–
US$81m
£32m fully paid
£5m nil paid
14.44% VND2,521,308m
£100m
13.95%
–
20.00%
All the above investments in associates are owned by subsidiaries of HSBC Holdings.
HSBC had US$7,747 million (2006: US$4,747 million) of investments in associates and joint ventures listed in Hong
Kong.
For the year ended 31 December 2007, HSBC’s share of associates and joint ventures tax on profit was
US$469 million (2006: US$279 million), which is included within share of profit in associates and joint ventures in
the income statement.
407
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 21 and 22
Summarised aggregate financial information on associates
HSBC’s share of:
– assets ...........................................................................................................................................
– liabilities .....................................................................................................................................
– revenues ......................................................................................................................................
– profit after tax .............................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
100,799
94,178
5,568
1,466
2006
US$m
83,096
77,446
5,521
823
HSBC’s investment in Industrial Bank Company Limited was equity accounted with effect from May 2004,
reflecting HSBC’s significant influence over this associate. HSBC’s significant influence was established as a result
of representation on the Board of Directors, and in accordance with the Technical Support and Assistance
Agreements, HSBC is assisting in the development of financial and operating policies.
HSBC’s investment in Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Limited was equity accounted with effect
from 31 August 2005, reflecting HSBC’s significant influence over this associate. HSBC’s significant influence was
established as a result of representation on the Board of Directors.
HSBC’s significant influence in Bank of Communications Co., Limited was established as a result of representation
on the Board of Directors, and in accordance with the Technical Support and Assistance Agreements, HSBC is
assisting in the development of financial and operating policies and a number of staff have been seconded to assist in
this process.
The statutory accounting reference date of Bank of Communications Co., Limited, Ping An Insurance (Group)
Company of China, Limited and Industrial Bank Company Limited is 31 December. For the year ended 31 December
2007, these companies were included on the basis of financial statements made up for the twelve months to
30 September 2007, taking into account changes in the subsequent period from 1 October 2007 to 31 December 2007
that would have materially affected their results.
HSBC also has a 100 per cent interest in the issued preferred stock (less than US$1 million) of Wells Fargo HSBC
Trade Bank, N.A. HSBC has a 40 per cent economic interest in Wells Fargo HSBC Trade Bank, N.A. by virtue of the
joint agreement under which HSBC’s equity capital and preferred stock interests are being held.
HSBC’s investment in Financiera Independencia S.A. de C.V. was equity accounted with effect from June 2006,
reflecting HSBC’s significant influence over this associate. HSBC’s influence results from representation on the
Board of Directors.
HSBC acquired 15 per cent of Vietnam Technological & Commercial Joint Stock Bank in October 2007. This
investment was equity accounted from that date due to HSBC’s representation on the Board of Directors and
involvement in the Technical Support and Assistance Agreement. In December 2007, as a result of a rights issue in
which HSBC did not participate, HSBC’s equity interest was diluted to 14.44 per cent.
HSBC acquired 13.95 per cent of VocaLink in June 2007. This investment was equity accounted from that date,
reflecting HSBC’s significant influence over that entity arising from representation on the Board of Directors and
transactions with the associate.
During the year, certain HSBC associates issued new shares which HSBC did not subscribe for. As a result, its
interests in the associates’ equity decreased. The resulting gains from dilution of the Group’s interest in the associates
are described in Note 4.
Principal interests in joint ventures
At 31 December 2007
Country of
incorporation
Principal
activity
HSBC Saudi Arabia Limited ........................................
Saudi Arabia
Investment
Vaultex (UK) Limited ..................................................
England
banking
Cash
management
HSBC’s
interest in
equity
capital
60%
50%
Issued
equity
capital
SR50m
£10m
408
HSBC Saudi Arabia Limited was established as a joint venture between HSBC and The Saudi British Bank with
effect from July 2006. The ownership of HSBC Saudi Arabia Limited is split between HSBC, with 60 per cent, and
The Saudi British Bank, with 40 per cent. The strategic financial and operating decisions of HSBC Saudi Arabia
Limited require the unanimous consent of HSBC and The Saudi British Bank.
Summarised aggregate financial information on joint ventures
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
HSBC’s share of:
– current assets ..............................................................................................................................
– non-current assets .......................................................................................................................
– current liabilities .........................................................................................................................
– non-current liabilities .................................................................................................................
– income ........................................................................................................................................
– expenses ......................................................................................................................................
448
76
397
46
339
302
125
107
98
87
102
79
22 Goodwill and intangible assets
Goodwill and intangible assets includes goodwill arising on business combinations, the PVIF long-term insurance
business, and other intangible assets.
Goodwill
Europe
US$m
Hong Kong
US$m
Rest of
Asia-
Pacific
US$m
North
America
US$m
Latin
America
US$m
Cost
At 1 January 2007 .......................................
Additions .....................................................
Disposals .....................................................
Exchange differences ..................................
Other changes .............................................
At 31 December 2007 .................................
Cost
At 1 January 2006 .......................................
Additions .....................................................
Exchange differences ..................................
Other changes .............................................
At 31 December 2006 .................................
15,234
42
(43)
1,516
(5)
16,744
13,777
29
1,428
–
15,234
124
–
–
–
–
124
120
–
4
–
124
325
6
–
19
–
350
270
34
25
(4)
325
12,527
–
(12)
46
–
12,561
12,424
55
–
48
12,527
4,262
143
–
120
(51)
4,474
2,634
1,608
20
–
4,262
Total
US$m
32,472
191
(55)
1,701
(56)
34,253
29,225
1,726
1,477
44
32,472
During 2007 there was no impairment of goodwill (2006: nil; 2005: nil). Impairment testing in respect of goodwill is
performed annually by comparing the recoverable amount of cash-generating units (‘CGU’s) determined at 1 July
2007 based on a value in use calculation. That calculation uses cash flow estimates based on management’s cash flow
projections, extrapolated in perpetuity using a nominal long-term growth rate based on current market assessment of
GDP and inflation for the countries within which the CGU operates. Cash flows are extrapolated in perpetuity due to
the long-term perspective within the Group of the business units making up the CGUs. The pre-tax discount rate used
is based on the cost of capital HSBC allocates to investments in the countries within which the CGU operates.
The cost of capital assigned to an individual CGU and used to discount its future cash flows can have a significant
effect on its valuation. The cost of capital percentage is generally derived from an appropriate capital asset pricing
model, which itself depends on inputs reflecting a number of financial and economic variables including the risk-free
rate in the country concerned and a premium to reflect the inherent risk of the business being evaluated. These
variables are established on the basis of management judgement and current market assessments of economic
variables.
Management judgement is required in estimating the future cash flows of the CGUs. These values are sensitive to the
cash flows projected for the periods for which detailed forecasts are available, and to assumptions regarding the long-
term sustainable pattern of cash flows thereafter. While the acceptable range within which underlying
409
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 22
assumptions can be applied is governed by the requirement for resulting forecasts to be compared with actual
performance and verifiable economic data in future years, the cash flow forecasts necessarily and appropriately
reflect management’s view of future business prospects.
It is HSBC’s policy to retest goodwill when there are indications that conditions have changed since the last goodwill
impairment test such that a different outcome may result. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Personal Financial
Services – North America CGU experienced deterioration in economic and credit conditions, and carried out
restructuring in certain operations. As a result, goodwill impairment was retested as at 31 December 2007. This
testing confirmed that, notwithstanding the effects of the above factors, goodwill for the CGU as a whole remained
unimpaired.
The following CGUs include in their carrying value goodwill that is a significant proportion of total goodwill
reported by HSBC. These CGUs do not carry on their balance sheets any intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives, other than goodwill.
2007
2006
Cash-generating unit
Goodwill at
1 July
2007
US$m
Discount
rate
%
Nominal
growth rate
beyond
initial
cash flow
projections
%
Goodwill at
1 July
2006
US$m
Discount
rate
%
Nominal
growth rate
beyond
initial
cash flow
projections
%
Personal Financial Services – Europe ................
Commercial Banking – Europe ..........................
Private Banking – Europe ...................................
Global Banking and Markets – Europe ..............
Personal Financial Services – North America ....
Personal Financial Services – Latin America .....
4,197
3,045
4,694
3,894
10,160
2,781
10.3
10.1
10.0
10.1
12.3
16.4
5.2
4.6
3.8
4.4
4.0
7.8
Total goodwill in the CGUs listed above ...........
28,771
4,149
2,948
4,417
3,792
10,169
1,753
27,228
10.6
10.2
10.0
8.2
10.0
16.0
5.0
4.5
4.2
4.5
5.8
8.2
At 1 July 2007, aggregate goodwill of US$4,254 million had been allocated to CGUs that were not considered
individually significant. These CGUs do not carry on their balance sheets any intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives, other than goodwill.
The present value of in-force long-term insurance business
Movement on the PVIF
At 1 January .......................................................................................................................................
Addition from current year new business .........................................................................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries or portfolios ...........................................................................................
Movement from in-force business (including investment return variances and changes in
investment assumptions) ..............................................................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements .....................................................................................
At 31 December .................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
1,549
380
390
(204)
(150)
1,965
2006
US$m
1,400
254
–
(203)
98
1,549
PVIF-specific assumptions
The key assumptions used in the computation of PVIF for HSBC’s main life insurance operations were:
Risk free rate ..................................
Risk discount rate ..........................
Expenses inflation .........................
2007
Hong Kong
%
3.51
11.00
3.00
UK
%
4.30
8.00
3.40
France1
%
4.26
8.00
2.00
2006
UK
%
4.30
8.00
3.40
Hong Kong
%
3.73
11.00
3.00
1 HSBC acquired HSBC Assurances in March 2007.
410
The PVIF represents the value of the shareholder’s interest in the in-force business of the life insurance operations.
The calculation of the PVIF is based upon assumptions that take into account risk and uncertainty. To project these
cash flows, a variety of assumptions regarding future experience is made by each insurance operation which reflects
local market conditions and management’s judgement of local future trends. Some of the Group’s insurance
operations incorporate risk margins separately into the projection assumptions for each product, while others
incorporate risk margins into the overall discount rate. This is reflected in the wide range of risk discount rates
applied.
Other intangible assets
The analysis of the movement of intangible assets, excluding the PVIF, was as follows:
Trade
names
US$m
Mortgage
servicing
rights
US$m
Internally
generated
software
US$m
Purchased
software
US$m
Customer/
merchant
relation-
ships
US$m
Other
US$m
Total
US$m
57
–
–
–
6
–
63
(21)
(20)
–
–
(3)
–
(44)
1,078
124
–
–
–
–
1,202
(619)
(108)
–
–
–
3
(724)
2,871
587
–
(7)
81
(59)
3,473
(1,772)
(327)
(3)
–
(51)
(14)
(2,167)
645
104
–
(21)
38
(6)
760
(426)
(120)
–
18
(25)
4
(549)
1,655
140
4
(6)
83
(10)
1,866
(320)
(209)
–
6
(17)
(1)
(541)
179
6
–
(2)
1
(19)
165
(13)
(21)
–
1
–
–
(33)
6,485
961
4
(36)
209
(94)
7,529
(3,171)
(805)
(3)
25
(96)
(8)
(4,058)
Cost
At 1 January 2007 .......................
Additions1 ...................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries .........
Disposals .....................................
Exchange differences ..................
Other changes .............................
At 31 December 2007 .................
Accumulated amortisation
At 1 January 2007 .......................
Charge for the year2 ....................
Impairment ..................................
Disposals .....................................
Exchange differences ..................
Other changes .............................
At 31 December 2007 .................
Net carrying amount at
31 December 2007 ..................
19
478
1,306
211
1,325
132
3,471
Cost
At 1 January 2006 .......................
Additions1 ...................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries .........
Disposals .....................................
Amounts written-off ...................
Exchange differences ..................
Other changes .............................
At 31 December 2006..................
Accumulated amortisation
At 1 January 2006 .......................
Charge for the year2 ....................
Impairment ..................................
Disposals .....................................
Amounts written-off ...................
Exchange differences ..................
Other changes .............................
At 31 December 2006 .................
Net carrying amount at
31 December 2006 ..................
43
–
15
–
–
(1)
–
57
(15)
(7)
–
–
–
1
–
(21)
979
99
–
–
–
–
–
1,078
(560)
(59)
–
–
–
–
–
(619)
2,094
589
–
(3)
–
150
41
2,871
(1,301)
(345)
(25)
–
–
(97)
(4)
(1,772)
295
70
6
(21)
–
17
278
645
(170)
(107)
(3)
20
–
(13)
(153)
(426)
1,034
96
195
–
(71)
28
373
1,655
(173)
(137)
(56)
–
71
(1)
(24)
(320)
373
3
114
(1)
–
39
(349)
179
(24)
(36)
–
–
–
(4)
51
(13)
4,818
857
330
(25)
(71)
233
343
6,485
(2,243)
(691)
(84)
20
71
(114)
(130)
(3,171)
36
459
1,099
219
1,335
166
3,314
1 At 31 December 2007, HSBC had US$47 million (2006: US$23 million) of contractual commitments to acquire intangible assets.
2 The amortisation charge for the year is recognised within the income statement under ‘Amortisation and impairment of intangible
assets’, with the exception of the amortisation of mortgage servicing rights that is charged to net fee income.
411
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 23
23 Property, plant and equipment
HSBC
Property, plant and equipment
Freehold
land and
buildings
US$m
Long
leasehold
land and
buildings
US$m
Short
leasehold
land and
buildings1
US$m
Equipment,
fixtures
and fittings2
US$m
Equipment
on
operating
leases
US$m
Cost or fair value
At 1 January 2007 ...............................................
Additions at cost4 ................................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries .................................
Fair value adjustments ........................................
Disposals .............................................................
Reclassified as held for sale ...............................
Transfers .............................................................
Exchange differences ..........................................
Other changes .....................................................
At 31 December 2007 .........................................
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
At 1 January 2007 ...............................................
Depreciation charge for the year ........................
Disposals .............................................................
Reclassified as held for sale ...............................
Transfers .............................................................
Impairment losses recognised .............................
Impairment losses reversed ................................
Exchange differences ..........................................
Other changes .....................................................
At 31 December 2007 .........................................
5,331
684
93
25
(256)
(446)
–
237
(967)
4,701
(342)
(93)
41
73
–
(26)
14
(18)
7
(344)
1,936
78
–
21
(37)
(596)
(5)
1
40
1,438
(168)
(37)
7
23
–
–
–
(1)
1
(175)
2,574
397
–
106
(117)
(82)
5
49
(76)
2,856
(723)
(167)
95
3
–
(5)
–
(19)
(10)
(826)
Net carrying amount at 31 December 2007 ........
4,357
1,263
2,030
Cost or fair value
At 1 January 2006 ...............................................
Additions at cost4 ................................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries .................................
Fair value adjustments ........................................
Disposals .............................................................
Transfers .............................................................
Exchange differences ..........................................
Other changes .....................................................
At 31 December 2006 .........................................
Accumulated depreciation and impairment
At 1 January 2006 ...............................................
Depreciation charge for the year ........................
Disposals .............................................................
Transfers .............................................................
Exchange differences ..........................................
Other changes .....................................................
At 31 December 2006 .........................................
4,828
376
189
64
(407)
–
287
(6)
5,331
(252)
(85)
30
–
(28)
(7)
(342)
2,235
24
–
77
(421)
(38)
102
(43)
1,936
(132)
(46)
2
1
(8)
15
(168)
2,265
253
17
23
(66)
38
65
(21)
2,574
(604)
(131)
59
(1)
(40)
(6)
(723)
Net carrying amount at 31 December 2006 ........
4,989
1,768
1,851
9,702
1,429
–
–
(542)
(160)
–
450
78
10,957
(5,974)
(1,192)
469
67
–
(3)
–
(282)
(88)
(7,003)
3,954
8,639
1,473
55
–
(972)
–
633
(126)
9,702
(5,418)
(1,075)
915
–
(401)
5
(5,974)
3,728
Total3
US$m
25,466
2,720
93
152
(1,081)
(1,284)
–
865
(925)
26,006
(9,042)
(1,694)
727
166
–
(34)
14
(358)
(91)
5,923
132
–
–
(129)
–
–
128
–
6,054
(1,835)
(205)
115
–
–
–
–
(38)
(1)
(1,964)
(10,312)
4,090
15,694
4,964
274
1
–
(28)
–
474
238
5,923
(1,319)
(177)
89
–
(190)
(238)
(1,835)
22,931
2,400
262
164
(1,894)
–
1,561
42
25,466
(7,725)
(1,514)
1,095
–
(667)
(231)
(9,042)
4,088
16,424
Leasehold land and buildings are considered to be held under finance lease contracts where the value of the land cannot reliably be
separated from the value of the lease, and the respective contracts do not meet the criteria for classification as operating leases.
1 Including assets held on finance leases with a net book value of US$13 million (2006: US$11 million).
2 Including assets held on finance leases with a net book value of US$397 million (2006: US$450 million).
3 Including assets with a net book value of US$422 million (2006: US$425 million) pledged as security for liabilities.
4 At 31 December 2007, HSBC had US$1,011 million (2006: US$1,380 million) of contractual commitments to acquire property, plant
and equipment.
412
Included within ‘Short leasehold land and buildings’ are the following amounts in respect of assets classed as
improvements to buildings, which are carried at depreciated historical cost:
2007
Cost
US$m
Accumulated
depreciation
US$m
2006
Cost
US$m
Accumulated
depreciation
US$m
At 1 January ..................................................................
Additions ......................................................................
Disposals .......................................................................
Depreciation charge for the year ..................................
Impairment loss recognised ..........................................
Exchange differences ....................................................
Other changes ...............................................................
At 31 December ............................................................
Net carrying amount at 31 December ...........................
Investment properties
1,277
294
(117)
–
–
43
(7)
1,490
819
(351)
–
94
(123)
–
(10)
(281)
(671)
1,026
218
(67)
–
–
63
37
1,277
926
The composition of the investment properties at fair value in the year was as follows:
Freehold
land and
buildings
US$m
Long
leasehold
land and
buildings
US$m
Short
leasehold
land and
buildings
US$m
Fair value
At 1 January 2007 ..........................................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries ............................................
Additions at cost ............................................................
Fair value adjustments ...................................................
Disposals ........................................................................
Reclassified as held for sale ..........................................
Transfers ........................................................................
Exchange differences .....................................................
Other changes1 ...............................................................
At 31 December 2007 ....................................................
At 1 January 2006 ..........................................................
Additions at cost ............................................................
Fair value adjustments ...................................................
Disposals ........................................................................
Exchange differences .....................................................
Other changes1 ...............................................................
At 31 December 2006 ....................................................
1,533
93
287
25
(3)
(61)
–
27
(976)
925
1,438
179
64
(178)
42
(12)
1,533
174
–
–
21
–
(5)
(2)
1
16
205
477
–
77
(371)
12
(21)
174
242
–
–
106
–
(48)
4
(1)
(87)
216
255
–
23
(8)
–
(28)
242
(315)
–
47
(35)
(3)
(37)
(8)
(351)
Total
US$m
1,949
93
287
152
(3)
(114)
2
27
(1,047)
1,346
2,170
179
164
(557)
54
(61)
1,949
1 Mainly relating to investment properties of subsidiaries no longer qualifying for consolidation, because HSBC does not have the
majority of the risks and rewards of ownership.
Investment properties are valued on an open market value basis as at 31 December each year by independent
professional valuers who have recent experience in the location and type of properties. Investment properties in Hong
Kong, the Macau Special Administrative Region and mainland China, which represent 25 per cent by value of
HSBC’s investment properties subject to revaluation, were valued by DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Limited, which is a
member of the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors.
Included within ‘Other operating income’ was rental income of US$42 million (2006: US$153 million) earned by
HSBC on its investment properties. Direct operating expenses of US$3 million (2006: US$61 million) incurred in
respect of the investment properties during the year were recognised in ‘General and administrative expenses’. Direct
operating expenses arising in respect of investment properties that did not generate rental income during 2007
amounted to nil (2006: nil).
HSBC recognised US$22 million (2006: US$144 million) as contractual obligations to purchase, construct, develop,
maintain or enhance investment properties.
413
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 24
HSBC Holdings had no investment properties at 31 December 2007 or 2006.
HSBC properties leased to customers
HSBC properties leased to customers included US$387 million at 31 December 2007 (2006: US$470 million) let
under operating leases, net of accumulated depreciation of US$18 million (2006: US$53 million). None was held by
HSBC Holdings.
24 Investments in subsidiaries
Principal subsidiaries of HSBC Holdings
At 31 December 2007
HSBC’s
interest in
equity capital
%
Country of
incorporation
or registration
Issued equity
capital
Europe
HFC Bank Limited ..........................................................................................
HSBC Investments (UK) Limited ...................................................................
HSBC Asset Finance (UK) Limited ................................................................
HSBC Bank A.S. .............................................................................................
HSBC Bank Malta p.l.c. ..................................................................................
HSBC Bank plc ................................................................................................
HSBC France ...................................................................................................
HSBC Bank International Limited ..................................................................
HSBC Life (UK) Limited ................................................................................
HSBC Private Banking Holdings (Suisse) S.A. ..............................................
HSBC Trinkaus & Burkhardt AG ...................................................................
Marks and Spencer Retail Financial Services Holdings Limited ....................
Hong Kong
Hang Seng Bank Limited ................................................................................
HSBC Insurance (Asia) Limited ......................................................................
HSBC Life (International) Limited .................................................................
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited .........................
Rest of Asia-Pacific
HSBC Bank Australia Limited ........................................................................
HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited ..........................................................
HSBC Bank Egypt S.A.E. ...............................................................................
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad .........................................................................
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited ...................................................................
North America
The Bank of Bermuda Limited ........................................................................
HSBC Bank Canada ........................................................................................
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. ...................................................................................
HSBC Finance Corporation .............................................................................
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. ...........................................................................
Latin America
HSBC Bank Argentina S.A. ............................................................................
HSBC Bank Brasil S.A. – Banco Múltiplo .....................................................
HSBC Mexico S.A. ..........................................................................................
HSBC Bank Panama S.A. ................................................................................
England
England
England
Turkey
Malta
England
France
Jersey
England
Switzerland
Germany
England
Hong Kong
Hong Kong
Bermuda
Hong Kong
Australia
PRC1
Egypt
Malaysia
Jersey
Bermuda
Canada
United States
United States
United States
Argentina
Brazil
Mexico
Panama
100
100
100
100
70.03
100
99.99
100
100
100
78.60
100
£109m
£37m
£265m
TRL652m
Lm36m
£797m
€380m
£1m
£94m
CHF1,363m
€70m
£67m
62.14
100
100
100
HK$9,559m
HK$125m
HK$327m
HK$22,494m
100
100
94.53
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
A$811m
RMB8,000m
E£1,073m
RM$114m
US$431m
US$30m
C$1,125m
US$2m
US$3,038m
–2
99.99
100
99.99
100.00
ARS1,792m
BRL2,147m
MXP4,272m
US$315m
1 People’s Republic of China.
2 Issued equity capital is less than US$1 million.
3 Details of the debt, subordinated debt and preference shares issued by the principal subsidiaries to parties external to the Group are
included in the Notes 28 ‘Debt securities in issue’, 32 ‘Subordinated liabilities’ and 37 ‘Minority interests’, respectively.
All the above subsidiaries are included in the HSBC consolidated financial statements.
Details of all HSBC companies will be annexed to the next Annual Return of HSBC Holdings filed with the UK
Registrar of Companies.
414
All the above make their financial statements up to 31 December except for HSBC Bank Argentina S.A., HSBC La
Buenos Aires Seguros S.A. and Maxima S.A. AFJP, whose financial statements are made up to 30 June annually.
The principal countries of operation are the same as the countries of incorporation except for HSBC Bank Middle
East Limited which operates mainly in the Middle East and HSBC Life (International) Limited which operates
mainly in Hong Kong.
Subsidiaries which experience significant restrictions on their ability to transfer funds to HSBC in the form of
cash dividends or to repay loans and advances
During 2007 and 2006, none of the Group’s subsidiaries have experienced significant restrictions on paying
dividends or repaying loans and advances.
Subsidiaries excluding SPEs where HSBC owns less than 50 per cent of the voting rights
Subsidiary
HSBC’s
interest in
equity capital
%
Description of relationship
that gives HSBC control
2007
HSBC Private Equity Fund 3 ..................................
2006
HSBC Private Equity Fund 3 ..................................
38.8
HSBC has been appointed as investment adviser/manager of the
fund and is therefore deemed to have control in the fund.
38.8
HSBC has been appointed as investment adviser/manager of the
fund and is therefore deemed to have control in the fund.
SPEs consolidated by HSBC where HSBC owns less than 50 per cent of the voting rights
Carrying value of total
consolidated assets
US$bn
Nature of SPE
2007
Asscher Finance Limited ......................................................................................
Bryant Park Funding LLC ....................................................................................
Cullinan Funding Ltd ...........................................................................................
Household Consumer Loan Corporation ..............................................................
HSBC Affinity Corporation I ...............................................................................
HSBC Auto Receivables Corporation ..................................................................
HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I .............................................................
HSBC Receivables Funding, Inc I .......................................................................
Metris Receivables Inc .........................................................................................
Regency Assets Limited .......................................................................................
Solitaire Funding Ltd ............................................................................................
2006
Bryant Park Funding LLC ....................................................................................
Household Consumer Loan Corporation ..............................................................
HSBC Affinity Corporation I ...............................................................................
HSBC Auto Receivables Corporation ..................................................................
HSBC Home Equity Loan Corporation I .............................................................
HSBC Receivables Funding, Inc I .......................................................................
Metris Receivables Inc .........................................................................................
Regency Assets Limited .......................................................................................
Solitaire Funding Ltd ............................................................................................
7.4
5.3
33.3
9.3
5.8
5.2
8.2
6.0
5.5
9.1
21.6
5.3
6.1
5.7
6.9
8.7
6.0
6.2
9.4
20.4
Structured investment vehicle
Conduit
Structured investment vehicle
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Conduit
Conduit
Conduit
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Securitisation
Conduit
Conduit
In each of the above cases, HSBC has less than 50 per cent of the voting rights, but consolidates because it has the
majority of risks and rewards of ownership of the SPE, or the substance of the relationship with the SPE is such that
its activities are conducted on behalf of HSBC according to its specific business needs so that HSBC obtains benefit
from the SPEs operation. HSBC also consolidates a number of other individually insignificant SPEs where it owns
less than 50 per cent of the voting rights.
Acquisitions
HSBC made the following acquisitions of subsidiaries or business operations in 2007, which were accounted for
using the purchase method:
415
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 24, 25, 26 and 27
On 26 March 2007, the Group, through its subsidiary, HSBC France, acquired the 50.01 per cent of Erisa S.A. and
Erisa I.A.R.D. (together now re-named HSBC Assurances) shares not already owned, raising the total holding in each
entity to 100 per cent. HSBC Assurances is a group of companies offering life, property and casualty insurance
products through HSBC France’s networks. HSBC paid a cash consideration of US$304 million in respect of this
acquisition. The fair value of the assets acquired exceeded the cash consideration by US$17 million and this excess
has been recognised within other operating income in the income statement.
The fair values of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of HSBC Assurances were as follows:
At date of acquisition
Financial assets designated at fair value .......................................................................................
Derivative assets ............................................................................................................................
Loans and advances to banks ........................................................................................................
Financial investments ....................................................................................................................
Intangible assets ............................................................................................................................
Property, plant and equipment ......................................................................................................
Prepayments and accrued income .................................................................................................
Other assets ....................................................................................................................................
Deposits by banks ..........................................................................................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ..................................................................................
Derivative liabilities ......................................................................................................................
Provisions and deferred tax ...........................................................................................................
Other liabilities ...............................................................................................................................
Liabilities under insurance contracts issued ..................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ..................................................................................................................
Net assets acquired ........................................................................................................................
Less: carrying value of HSBC’s existing interest in HSBC Assurances ......................................
Excess fair value of assets acquired ..............................................................................................
Total consideration including costs of acquisition .......................................................................
Carrying value
immediately
prior to
acquisition
US$m
7,684
50
94
11,211
390
93
257
81
(1)
(72)
(15)
(143)
(1,434)
(17,478)
(74)
643
Fair
value
US$m
7,684
50
94
11,211
390
93
257
81
(1)
(72)
(15)
(143)
(1,434)
(17,478)
(74)
643
(322)
(17)
304
In addition to the above, there were other minor acquisitions and increases in investment in subsidiaries which
increased goodwill by US$191 million, including US$94 million of goodwill arising on the increase in HSBC’s stake
in Inversiones Financieras Bancosal.
25 Other assets
Bullion ...............................................................................................................................................
Assets held for sale ............................................................................................................................
Reinsurers’ share of liabilities under insurance contracts (Note 30) .................................................
Endorsements and acceptances ..........................................................................................................
Other accounts ...................................................................................................................................
Assets held for sale
Non-current assets held for sale
Interests in associates .........................................................................................................................
Property, plant and equipment ...........................................................................................................
Investment properties .........................................................................................................................
Financial assets ..................................................................................................................................
Other ..................................................................................................................................................
Total assets classified as held for sale ...............................................................................................
2007
US$m
9,244
2,804
1,315
12,248
13,882
39,493
2007
US$m
2
2,502
111
185
4
2,804
2006
US$m
3,145
1,826
1,769
9,577
13,506
29,823
2006
US$m
25
1,149
13
634
5
1,826
416
Property, plant and equipment
The property, plant and equipment classified as held for sale comprises two principal categories. The first is as a
result of the repossession of property that had been pledged as collateral by customers. These assets are expected to
be disposed of within 12 months of acquisition. Neither a gain nor loss was recognised on reclassifying these assets
as held for sale. The majority arose within the geographical segment, North America.
Secondly, on 31 May 2007, HSBC entered into a contract for the sale and leaseback of the property and long
leasehold land comprising 8 Canada Square, London to Metrovacesa, S.A. (‘Metrovacesa’) for £1,090 million
(US$2,154 million). Under the terms of this arrangement, HSBC leased the building back from Metrovacesa for a
period of 20 years at an annual rent of £43.5 million (US$87 million), with annual upward-only rent reviews linked
to the RPI (all items) and subject to an annual maximum and minimum increase of 6 per cent and 2.5 per cent,
respectively. In the normal course of business, HSBC provided finance to Metrovacesa in respect of the debt element
of this transaction at arm’s length market rates in the form of a bridging loan of £810 million (US$1,601 million),
secured by a charge on the property. The bridging loan had an original maturity date of 30 November 2007 and was
extended with a new facility provided by HSBC with a maturity date of 30 November 2008. The equity portion of
£280 million (US$553 million) was settled in cash by Metrovacesa on 31 May 2007.
The sale has not been recognised in the financial statements at 31 December 2007 because HSBC has retained a
significant interest by virtue of the loan provided to part-finance the purchase of the building. Accordingly, 8 Canada
Square is presented within ‘Non-current assets held for sale’ with a carrying value of US$884 million. The equity
portion received from Metrovacesa is presented in the balance sheet as deferred income with a value at 31 December
2007 of US$562 million. It is expected that the sale will be recognised by HSBC when the bridging loan is repaid.
26 Trading liabilities
Deposits by banks ..............................................................................................................................
Customer accounts .............................................................................................................................
Other debt securities in issue .............................................................................................................
Other liabilities – net short positions .................................................................................................
27 Financial liabilities designated at fair value
HSBC
Deposits by banks and customer accounts ........................................................................................
Liabilities to customers under investment contracts .........................................................................
Debt securities in issue (Note 28) ......................................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities (Note 32) .....................................................................................................
Preference shares (Note 32) ...............................................................................................................
2007
US$m
58,940
102,710
44,684
108,246
314,580
2007
US$m
7,724
16,053
38,587
22,831
4,744
89,939
2006
US$m
32,040
89,166
34,115
71,287
226,608
2006
US$m
577
13,278
33,167
18,503
4,686
70,211
The carrying amount at 31 December 2007 of financial liabilities designated at fair value was US$648 million less
(2006: US$1,257 million more) than the contractual amount at maturity. At 31 December 2007, the accumulated
amount of the change in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was a gain of US$1,619 million (2006: loss of
US$1,535 million).
HSBC Holdings
Subordinated liabilities (Note 32):
– owed to third parties ...................................................................................................................
– owed to HSBC undertakings ......................................................................................................
2007
US$m
14,496
4,187
18,683
2006
US$m
9,839
4,231
14,070
417
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 28, 29 and 30
The carrying amount at 31 December 2007 of financial liabilities designated at fair value was US$130 million less
than the contractual amount at maturity (2006: US$551 million more). At 31 December 2007, the accumulated
amount of the change in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk was a gain of US$548 million (2006: loss of
US$335 million).
28 Debt securities in issue
Bonds and medium term notes ..........................................................................................................
Other debt securities in issue .............................................................................................................
Of which debt securities in issue reported as:
– trading liabilities (Note 26) .........................................................................................................
– financial liabilities designated at fair value (Note 27) ...............................................................
2007
US$m
221,767
108,083
329,850
(44,684)
(38,587)
246,579
2006
US$m
203,404
94,203
297,607
(34,115)
(33,167)
230,325
Certain debt securities in issue are managed on a fair value basis as part of HSBC’s interest rate risk management
policies. The hedged portion of these debt securities is presented within the balance sheet caption ‘Financial liabilities
designated at fair value’, with the remaining portion included within ‘Trading liabilities’. The following table
analyses the carrying amount of bonds and medium term notes in issue at 31 December with original maturities
greater than one year:
Fixed rate
Debentures – 8.375%: due 2007 ........................................................................................................
Secured financing:
1.14% to 3.99%: due 2008 to 2009 ...............................................................................................
4.00% to 4.99%: due 2008 to 2010 ...............................................................................................
5.00% to 5.99%: due 2008 to 2012 ...............................................................................................
6.00% to 6.99%: due 2008 ............................................................................................................
7.00% to 8.99%: due 2008 to 2025 ...............................................................................................
Other fixed rate senior debt:
0.01% to 3.99%: due 2008 to 2066 ...............................................................................................
4.00% to 4.99%: due 2008 to 2046 ...............................................................................................
5.00% to 5.99%: due 2008 to 2024 ...............................................................................................
6.00% to 6.99%: due 2008 to 2033 ...............................................................................................
7.00% to 7.99%: due 2008 to 2032 ...............................................................................................
8.00% to 9.99%: due 2008 to 2017 ...............................................................................................
10.00% or higher: due 2008 to 2017 .............................................................................................
Variable interest rate
Secured financings – 1.00% to 9.99%: due 2008 to 2017 ................................................................
FHLB advances – 5.00% to 5.99%: due 2008 to 2036 .....................................................................
Other variable interest rate senior debt – 2.16% to 9.99%: due 2008 to 2049 .................................
Structured notes
Interest rate linked .............................................................................................................................
Equity, equity index or credit linked .................................................................................................
2007
US$m
–
115
1,409
13,002
459
521
28,322
20,909
18,511
15,400
4,037
1,666
867
2006
US$m
100
195
1,730
6,096
–
313
17,326
17,759
34,191
16,196
6,692
1,665
399
105,218
102,662
47,404
5,500
56,244
109,148
770
6,631
7,401
23,212
5,000
63,504
91,716
379
8,647
9,026
Total bonds and medium term notes ..................................................................................................
221,767
203,404
418
29 Other liabilities
Amounts due to investors in funds consolidated
by HSBC ...................................................................
Obligations under finance leases (Note 42) ..................
Dividend declared and payable by HSBC Holdings ....
Endorsements and acceptances .....................................
Other liabilities .............................................................
30 Liabilities under insurance contracts
HSBC
2007
US$m
3,548
703
1,393
12,248
17,121
35,013
2007
Non-life insurance liabilities
Unearned premium provision ..........................................................................
Notified claims .................................................................................................
Claims incurred but not reported .....................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Life insurance policyholders’ liabilities
Life (non-linked) ..............................................................................................
Investment contracts with discretionary participation features1 ......................
Life (linked) .....................................................................................................
Total liabilities under insurance contracts .......................................................
2006
Non-life insurance liabilities
Unearned premium provision ..........................................................................
Notified claims .................................................................................................
Claims incurred but not reported .....................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Life insurance policyholders’ liabilities
Life (non-linked) ..............................................................................................
Investment contracts with discretionary participation features1 ......................
Life (linked) .....................................................................................................
Total liabilities under insurance contracts .......................................................
2006
US$m
966
707
1,507
9,577
15,262
28,019
Gross
US$m
1,279
1,063
420
92
2,854
14,370
18,983
6,399
39,752
42,606
1,262
949
460
268
2,939
11,026
20
3,685
14,731
17,670
HSBC Holdings
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
–
–
1,393
–
12
1,405
Reinsurers’
share
US$m
(181)
(380)
(49)
(43)
(653)
(605)
–
(57)
(662)
(1,315)
(176)
(355)
(58)
(76)
(665)
(1,046)
–
(58)
(1,104)
(1,769)
–
–
1,507
–
10
1,517
Net
US$m
1,098
683
371
49
2,201
13,765
18,983
6,342
39,090
41,291
1,086
594
402
192
2,274
9,980
20
3,627
13,627
15,901
1 Though investment contracts with discretionary participation features are financial instruments, HSBC continued to treat them as
insurance contracts as permitted by IFRS 4.
419
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 30
The movement of liabilities under insurance contracts during the year was as follows:
Non-life insurance liabilities
2007
Reinsurers’
share
US$m
(176)
22
(385)
407
(27)
(181)
(413)
(355)
(58)
207
(189)
18
(52)
(429)
(380)
(49)
(43)
(653)
2006
Reinsurers’
share
US$m
(202)
48
(451)
499
(22)
(176)
(465)
(335)
(130)
228
(147)
(24)
(5)
(413)
(355)
(58)
(76)
(665)
Gross
US$m
1,262
(2)
1,853
(1,855)
19
1,279
1,409
949
460
(1,017)
1,035
64
(8)
1,483
1,063
420
92
2,854
Gross
US$m
1,346
(122)
1,824
(1,946)
38
1,262
1,296
872
424
(889)
680
219
103
1,409
949
460
268
2,939
Net
US$m
1,086
20
1,468
(1,448)
(8)
1,098
996
594
402
(810)
846
82
(60)
1,054
683
371
49
2,201
Net
US$m
1,144
(74)
1,373
(1,447)
16
1,086
831
537
294
(661)
533
195
98
996
594
402
192
2,274
Unearned premium reserve (‘UPR’)
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Changes in UPR recognised as (income)/expense ..........................................
Gross written premiums ..............................................................................
Gross earned premiums ...............................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Notified and incurred but not reported claims
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Notified claims ............................................................................................
Claims incurred but not reported .................................................................
Claims paid in current year ..............................................................................
Claims incurred in respect of current year ......................................................
Claims incurred in respect of prior years ........................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Notified claims ............................................................................................
Claims incurred but not reported .................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Total non-life insurance liabilities ...................................................................
UPR
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Changes in UPR recognised as (income)/expense ..........................................
Gross written premiums ..............................................................................
Gross earned premiums ...............................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Notified and incurred but not reported claims
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Notified claims ............................................................................................
Claims incurred but not reported .................................................................
Claims paid in current year ..............................................................................
Claims incurred in respect of current year ......................................................
Claims incurred in respect of prior years ........................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Notified claims ............................................................................................
Claims incurred but not reported .................................................................
Other ................................................................................................................
Total non-life insurance liabilities ...................................................................
420
Life insurance liabilities to policyholders
Life (non-linked)
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................
Increase in liabilities to policyholders .............................................................
Acquisitions of subsidiaries .............................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Investment contracts with discretionary participation features
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................
Increase in liabilities to policyholders .............................................................
Acquisitions of subsidiaries .............................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Life (linked)
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................
Increase in liabilities to policyholders .............................................................
Acquisitions of subsidiaries .............................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements1 ..................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Gross
US$m
11,026
(940)
3,377
702
205
14,370
20
(1,080)
2,188
16,406
1,449
18,983
3,685
(790)
2,886
339
279
6,399
Total liabilities to policyholders ......................................................................
39,752
1 Includes amounts arising under modified reinsurance agreements.
2007
Reinsurers’
share
US$m
(1,046)
169
349
–
(77)
(605)
–
–
–
–
–
–
(58)
(45)
(1,120)
–
1,166
(57)
(662)
Life (non-linked)
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................
Increase in liabilities to policyholders .............................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
2006
Reinsurers’
share
US$m
(807)
154
(208)
(185)
Gross
US$m
8,369
(814)
3,021
450
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
11,026
(1,046)
Investment contracts with discretionary participation features
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Increase in liabilities to policyholders .............................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
Life (linked)
At 1 January .....................................................................................................
Benefits paid ....................................................................................................
Increase in liabilities to policyholders .............................................................
Exchange differences and other movements ...................................................
At 31 December ...............................................................................................
9
6
5
20
2,895
(495)
1,146
139
3,685
–
–
–
–
(69)
9
11
(9)
(58)
Net
US$m
9,980
(771)
3,726
702
128
13,765
20
(1,080)
2,188
16,406
1,449
18,983
3,627
(835)
1,766
339
1,445
6,342
39,090
Net
US$m
7,562
(660)
2,813
265
9,980
9
6
5
20
2,826
(486)
1,157
130
3,627
Total liabilities to policyholders ......................................................................
14,731
(1,104)
13,627
The increase in liabilities to policyholders represents the aggregate of all events giving rise to additional liabilities to
policyholders in the year. These include death claims, surrenders, lapses, the setting up of liability to policyholders at
the initial inception of the policy, the declaration of bonuses and other amounts attributable to policyholders.
421
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 31 and 32
31 Provisions
At 1 January .......................................................................................................................................
Additional provisions/increase in provisions1 ...................................................................................
Acquisition of subsidiaries ................................................................................................................
Provisions utilised ..............................................................................................................................
Amounts reversed ..............................................................................................................................
Exchange differences and other movements .....................................................................................
At 31 December .................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
1,763
1,307
1
(986)
(318)
191
1,958
2006
US$m
1,436
652
54
(379)
(154)
154
1,763
1 The increase in provisions includes the unwinding of discounts of US$1 million (2006: US$8 million) in relation to vacant space
provisions and US$24 million (2006: US$19 million) in relation to Brazilian provisions for civil and fiscal labour claims.
Included within Provisions are:
(i) Provisions for onerous property contracts of US$56 million (2006: US$106 million), of which US$33 million
(2006: US$71 million) relates to discounted future costs associated with leasehold properties that became vacant
as a consequence of HSBC’s move to Canary Wharf in 2002. The provisions cover rent voids while finding new
tenants, shortfalls in expected rent receivable compared with rent payable and the cost of refurbishing the
buildings to attract tenants. Uncertainties arise from movements in market rents, delays in finding new tenants
and the timing of rental reviews.
(ii) Labour, civil and fiscal litigation provisions in HSBC’s Brazil operations of US$391 million (2006:
US$282 million). These relate to labour and overtime litigation claims brought by employees after leaving the
bank. The provisions are based on the expected number of departing employees, their individual salaries and
historical trends. The timing of the settlement of these claims is uncertain.
(iii) Provisions of US$444 million (2006: US$749 million) have been made in respect of costs arising from
contingent liabilities and contractual commitments (Note 41), including guarantees of US$29 million
(2006: US$64 million) and commitments of US$125 million (2006: US$93 million).
32 Subordinated liabilities
HSBC
Subordinated liabilities
At amortised cost............................................................................................................................
– subordinated liabilities ..............................................................................................................
– preferred securities ....................................................................................................................
Designated at fair value (Note 27) ................................................................................................
– subordinated liabilities ..............................................................................................................
– preferred securities ....................................................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities
HSBC Holdings .............................................................................................................................
Other HSBC ...................................................................................................................................
Carrying amount
2007
US$m
24,819
19,308
5,511
27,575
22,831
4,744
52,394
18,931
33,463
52,394
2006
US$m
22,672
17,296
5,376
23,189
18,503
4,686
45,861
14,271
31,590
45,861
422
HSBC’s subordinated liabilities
Amounts owed to third parties by HSBC Holdings (see below) .................................................
Other HSBC subordinated liabilities
€1,400m
£700m
US$1,350m
US$1,200m
£600m
€800m
US$1,250m
€750m
US$1,000m
£500m
US$1,000m
US$1,000m
£500m
£500m
US$900m
€600m
€600m
US$750m
£350m
€500m
£350m
US$750m
£350m
£300m
£300m
US$500m
US$500m
US$450m
£225m
CAD400m
US$300m
BRL608m
US$300m
US$300m
US$300m
BRL500m
US$250m
US$250m
CAD200m
US$200m
US$200m
US$200m
US$200m
£150m
US$200m
5.3687% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities1 ........................
5.844% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities2 ..........................
9.547% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities, Series 11 ...........
Primary capital subordinated undated floating rate notes ....................................
4.75% subordinated notes 2046 ............................................................................
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 20163 ...................................................
4.61% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities1 ............................
5.13% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities1 ............................
4.625% subordinated notes 2014 ..........................................................................
8.208% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities1 ..........................
5.911% trust preferred securities 20354 ................................................................
5.875% subordinated notes 2034 ..........................................................................
5.375% subordinated notes 2033 ..........................................................................
4.75% callable subordinated notes 20205 .............................................................
10.176% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities, Series 21 .........
4.25% callable subordinated notes 20166 ..............................................................
8.03% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities1 ............................
Undated floating rate primary capital notes ..........................................................
Callable subordinated variable coupon notes 20177 .............................................
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 20208 ...................................................
5% callable subordinated notes 20239 ..................................................................
5.625% subordinated notes 2035 ..........................................................................
5.375% callable subordinated step-up notes 203010 .............................................
6.5% subordinated notes 2023 ..............................................................................
5.862% non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities2 ..........................
Undated floating rate primary capital notes ..........................................................
6.00% subordinated notes 2017 ............................................................................
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 20163 ...................................................
6.25% subordinated notes 2041 ............................................................................
4.80% subordinated notes 2022 ............................................................................
7.65% subordinated notes 2025 ............................................................................
Subordinated debentures 2008 ..............................................................................
6.95% subordinated notes 2011 ............................................................................
Undated floating rate primary capital notes, Series 3 ...........................................
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 201711 ..................................................
Subordinated certificates of deposit 2016 ............................................................
5.875% subordinated notes 2008 ..........................................................................
7.20% subordinated debentures 2097 ...................................................................
4.94% subordinated debentures 2021 ...................................................................
7.75% subordinated notes 2009 ............................................................................
7.808% capital securities 2026 .............................................................................
8.38% capital securities 2027 ...............................................................................
6.625% subordinated notes 2009 ..........................................................................
8.625% step-up undated subordinated notes .........................................................
7.53% capital securities 2026 ...............................................................................
Other subordinated liabilities each less than US$200m .......................................
2007
US$m
18,931
2006
US$m
14,271
2,018
1,404
1,335
1,207
1,186
1,176
1,130
1,039
1,001
996
992
990
931
931
900
881
878
750
712
676
672
653
652
598
558
500
498
448
447
389
359
341
325
301
299
281
248
218
207
202
200
200
199
–
–
3,535
33,463
52,394
1,918
1,374
1,336
1,205
1,160
1,052
1,158
1,011
998
982
991
1,048
1,043
942
900
801
790
750
675
658
687
685
701
585
599
501
–
448
438
–
373
285
326
300
–
234
243
217
169
205
200
191
197
304
209
2,701
31,590
45,861
Subordinated loan capital is repayable at par on maturity, but some is repayable prior to maturity at the option of the
borrower, generally with the non objection of the Financial Services Authority, and, where relevant, the consent of
the local banking regulator, and in certain cases at a premium over par. Interest rates on the floating rate loan capital
are related to interbank offered rates. On the remaining subordinated loan capital, interest is payable at fixed rates up
to 10.176 per cent.
1 See ‘Step-up perpetual preferred securities’ below, note (a) ‘Guaranteed by HSBC Holdings’.
2 See ‘Step-up perpetual preferred securities’ below, note (b) ‘Guaranteed by HSBC Bank’.
3 The interest margin on the €800m and US$450m callable subordinated floating rate notes 2016 increases by 0.5 per cent from March
2011 and July 2011, respectively.
423
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 32
4 The distributions on the trust preferred securities change in November 2015 to three-month dollar LIBOR plus 1.926 per cent.
5 The interest rate on the 4.75 per cent callable subordinated notes 2020 changes in September 2015 to three-month sterling LIBOR plus
0.82 per cent.
6 The interest rate on the 4.25 per cent callable subordinated notes changes in March 2011 to three-month EURIBOR plus 1.05 per cent.
7 The interest rate on the callable subordinated variable coupon notes 2017 is fixed at 5.75 per cent until June 2012. Thereafter, the rate
per annum is the sum of the gross redemption yield of the then prevailing five-year UK gilt plus 1.70 per cent.
8 The interest margin on the callable subordinated floating rate notes 2020 increases by 0.5 per cent from September 2015.
9 The interest rate on the 5 per cent callable subordinated notes 2023 changes in March 2018 to become the rate per annum which is the
sum of the gross redemption yield of the prevailing five-year UK gilt plus 1.80 per cent.
10 The interest rate on the 5.375 per cent callable subordinated step-up notes 2030 changes in November 2025 to three month sterling
LIBOR plus 1.50 per cent.
11 The interest margin on the callable subordinated floating rate notes 2017 increases by 0.5 per cent from July 2012.
Footnotes 3 to 10 all relate to notes that are repayable at the option of the borrower on the date of the change of the interest rate, and at
subsequent interest rate reset dates and interest payment dates in some cases, subject to the prior non objection of the Financial Services
Authority and, where relevant, the consent of the local banking regulator.
Step-up perpetual preferred securities
(a) Guaranteed by HSBC Holdings
The seven issues of non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities (footnote 1) were made by Jersey
limited partnerships and are guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, by HSBC Holdings. The proceeds of the issues
were on-lent to HSBC Holdings by the limited partnerships by issue of subordinated notes. The preferred
securities qualify as innovative tier 1 capital for HSBC. The preferred securities, together with the guarantee, are
intended to provide investors with rights to income and capital distributions and distributions upon liquidation of
HSBC Holdings that are equivalent to the rights that they would have had if they had purchased non-cumulative
perpetual preference shares of HSBC Holdings.
The preferred securities are perpetual, but redeemable in 2014, 2010, 2013, 2016, 2015, 2030 and 2012,
respectively, at the option of the general partner of the limited partnerships. If not redeemed, the distributions
payable step-up and become floating rate or, for the sterling issue, for each successive five-year period the sum
of the then five-year benchmark UK gilt plus a margin. There are limitations on the payment of distributions if
prohibited under UK banking regulations or other requirements, if a payment would cause a breach of HSBC’s
capital adequacy requirements, or if HSBC Holdings has insufficient distributable reserves (as defined).
HSBC Holdings has covenanted that if it is prevented under certain circumstances from paying distributions on
the preferred securities in full, it will not pay dividends or other distributions in respect of its ordinary shares, or
effect repurchase or redemption of its ordinary shares, until after a distribution has been paid in full.
If (i) HSBC’s total capital ratio falls below the regulatory minimum ratio required, or (ii) the Directors expect
that, in view of the deteriorating financial condition of HSBC Holdings, the former will occur in the near term,
then the preferred securities will be substituted by preference shares of HSBC Holdings having economic terms
which are in all material respects equivalent to those of the preferred securities and the guarantee taken together.
(b) Guaranteed by HSBC Bank
The two issues of non-cumulative step-up perpetual preferred securities (footnote 2) were made by Jersey limited
partnerships and are guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, by HSBC Bank. The proceeds of the issues were on-
lent to HSBC Bank by the limited partnerships by issue of subordinated notes. The preferred securities qualify as
innovative tier 1 capital for HSBC and for HSBC Bank on a solo and consolidated basis and, together with the
guarantee, are intended to provide investors with rights to income and capital distributions and distributions upon
liquidation of HSBC Bank that are equivalent to the rights they would have had if they had purchased non-
cumulative perpetual preference shares of HSBC Bank.
The two issues of preferred securities are perpetual, but redeemable in 2031 and 2020, respectively, at the option
of the general partner of the limited partnerships. If not redeemed, the distributions payable step-up and become
floating rate. The same limitations on the payment of distributions apply to HSBC Bank as to HSBC Holdings,
as described above. HSBC Bank has provided a similar covenant to that provided by HSBC Holdings, also as
described above.
If (i) any of the two issues of preferred securities are outstanding in November 2048 or April 2049, respectively,
or (ii) the total capital ratio of HSBC Bank on a solo and consolidated basis falls below the regulatory minimum
ratio required, or (iii) in view of the deteriorating financial condition of HSBC Bank, the Directors expect (ii) to
424
occur in the near term, then the preferred securities will be substituted by preference shares of HSBC Bank
having economic terms which are in all material respects equivalent to those of the preferred securities and the
guarantee taken together.
HSBC Holdings
Subordinated liabilities:
– At amortised cost .......................................................................................................................
– Designated at fair value (Note 27).............................................................................................
HSBC Holdings subordinated borrowings
Amounts owed to third parties
€2,000m
US$2,500m
US$2,000m
£900m
€1,000m
US$1,400m
£650m
US$1,000m
€700m
US$750m
US$750m
£250m
US$488m
€300m
US$222m
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 20141 ...................................................
6.5% subordinated notes 2037 ..............................................................................
6.5% subordinated notes 2036 ..............................................................................
6.375% callable subordinated notes 20222 ...........................................................
5.375% subordinated notes 2012 ..........................................................................
5.25% subordinated notes 2012 ............................................................................
5.75% subordinated notes 2027 ............................................................................
7.5% subordinated notes 2009 ..............................................................................
3.625% callable subordinated notes 20203 ............................................................
Callable subordinated floating rate note 20161 ....................................................
Callable subordinated floating rate notes 20151 ...................................................
9.875% subordinated bonds 20184 ........................................................................
7.625% subordinated notes 2032 ..........................................................................
5.5% subordinated notes 2009 ..............................................................................
7.35% subordinated notes 2032 ............................................................................
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings
€1,400m
US$1,350m
US$1,250m
€750m
£500m
US$900m
€600m
5.3687% fixed/floating subordinated notes 2043 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Euro 2) LP .....................................................................
9.547% subordinated step-up cumulative notes 2040 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Dollar 1) LP ..................................................................
4.61% fixed/floating subordinated notes 2043 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Dollar 2) LP ..................................................................
5.13% fixed/floating subordinated notes 2044 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Euro 3) LP .....................................................................
8.208% subordinated step-up cumulative notes 2040 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Sterling 1) LP ................................................................
10.176% subordinated step-up cumulative notes 2040 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Dollar 1) LP ..................................................................
8.03% subordinated step-up cumulative notes 2040 –
HSBC Capital Funding (Euro 1) LP .....................................................................
2007
US$m
8,544
18,683
27,227
2007
US$m
2,905
2,495
2,058
1,858
1,488
1,413
1,262
1,077
922
750
750
619
609
457
268
2006
US$m
8,423
14,070
22,493
2006
US$m
2,648
–
2,056
–
1,394
1,401
1,365
1,088
888
750
749
637
609
418
268
18,931
14,271
2,018
1,335
1,130
1,039
996
900
878
8,296
27,227
1,995
1,332
1,187
1,049
974
900
785
8,222
22,493
1 The interest margins on the callable subordinated floating rate notes 2014, 2015 and 2016 increase by 0.5 per cent from September
2009, March 2010 and October 2011 respectively. The notes are repayable from their step up date at the option of the borrower, subject
to the prior ‘non-objection’ of the Financial Services Authority.
2 The interest rate on the 6.375 per cent callable subordinated notes 2022 changes in October 2017 to become three-month sterling
LIBOR plus 1.3 per cent. The notes may be redeemed at par from October 2017 at the option of the borrower, subject to the prior
‘non-objection’ of the Financial Services Authority.
3 The interest rate on the 3.625 per cent callable subordinated notes 2020 changes in June 2015 to become three-month EURIBOR plus
0.93 per cent. The notes may be redeemed at par from June 2015 at the option of the borrower, subject to the prior ‘non-objection’ of
the Financial Services Authority.
4 The interest rate on the 9.875 per cent subordinated bonds 2018 changes in April 2013 to become the higher of (i) 9.875 per cent or (ii)
the sum of the yield on the relevant benchmark treasury stock plus 2.5 per cent. The bonds may be redeemed in April 2013 at par and
redemption has also been allowed from April 1998, subject to the prior ‘non-objection’ of the Financial Services Authority, for an
amount based on the redemption yields of the relevant benchmark treasury stocks.
425
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 33
33 Fair values of financial instruments
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing
parties in an arm’s length transaction.
Financial instruments measured at fair value on an ongoing basis include trading assets and liabilities, instruments
designated at fair value, derivatives, and financial investments classified as available-for-sale (including treasury and
other eligible bills, debt securities, and equity securities).
Fair value of financial instruments carried at fair value
Control framework
Fair values are subject to a control framework that aims to ensure that they are either determined, or validated, by a
function independent of the risk-taker. To this end, ultimate responsibility for the determination of fair values lies
with Finance, which reports functionally to the Group Finance Director. Finance establishes the accounting policies
and procedures governing valuation, and is responsible for ensuring that these comply with all relevant accounting
standards.
For fair values determined using a valuation model, the control framework may include, as applicable, independent
development or validation of (i) valuation models; (ii) any inputs to those models; and (iii) any adjustments required
outside of the valuation model, and, where possible, independent validation of model outputs.
For fair values determined without a valuation model, independent price determination or validation is utilised. The
results of independent validation processes are reported to senior management, and adjustments to the fair values are
made as appropriate.
Determination of fair value
Fair values are determined according to the following hierarchy:
(a) Quoted market price
Financial instruments with quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
(b) Valuation technique using observable inputs
Financial instruments with quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical
or similar instruments in inactive markets and financial instruments valued using models where all significant
inputs are observable.
(c) Valuation technique with significant non-observable inputs
Financial instruments valued using models where one or more significant inputs are not observable.
The best evidence of fair value is a quoted price in an actively traded market. In the event that the market for a
financial instrument is not active, a valuation technique is used. The majority of valuation techniques employ only
observable market data, and so the reliability of the fair value measurement is high. However, certain financial
instruments are valued on the basis of valuation techniques that feature one or more significant market inputs that are
not observable. For these instruments, the fair value derived is more judgemental. ‘Not observable’ in this context
means that there is little or no current market data available from which to determine the level at which an arm’s
length transaction would likely occur, but it generally does not mean that there is absolutely no market data available
upon which to base a determination of fair value (historical data may, for example, be used). Furthermore, the
assessment of hierarchy level is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value of the financial
instrument. Consequently, the level of uncertainty in the determination of the unobservable inputs will generally give
rise to valuation uncertainty that is less than the fair value itself. To assist in understanding the extent of this
uncertainty, additional information is provided in respect of these instruments in the ‘Effect of changes in significant
non-observable assumptions to reasonably possible alternatives’ section below.
In certain circumstances, HSBC applies the fair value option to its own debt in issue. Where available, the fair value
will be based upon quoted prices in an active market for the specific instrument concerned. Where unavailable, the
fair value will either be based upon quoted prices in an inactive market for the specific instrument concerned, or
estimated by comparison with quoted prices in an active market for similar instruments. The fair value of these
instruments therefore includes the effect of the appropriate credit spread to apply to HSBC’s liabilities. Gains and
losses arising from changes in the credit spread of liabilities issued by HSBC reverse over the contractual life of the
426
debt, provided that the debt is not repaid early.
Structured notes issued and certain other hybrid instrument liabilities are included within trading liabilities and are
measured at fair value. The credit spread applied to these instruments is derived from the spreads at which HSBC
issues structured notes. These market spreads are significantly smaller than credit spreads observed for plain vanilla
debt or in the credit default swap markets.
All net positions in non-derivative financial instruments, and all derivative portfolios, are valued at bid or offer prices
as appropriate. Long positions are marked at bid prices; short positions are marked at offer prices.
The fair values of large holdings of non-derivative financial instruments are based on a multiple of the value of a
single instrument, and do not include block adjustments for the size of the holding.
The valuation models used where quoted market prices are not available incorporate certain assumptions that HSBC
anticipates would be used by a market participant to establish fair value. Where HSBC believes that there are
additional considerations not included within the valuation model, appropriate adjustments may be made. Examples
of such adjustments are:
• Credit risk adjustment: an adjustment to reflect the credit worthiness of over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivative
counterparties.
• Market data/model uncertainty: an adjustment to reflect uncertainties in fair values based on unobservable
market data inputs (for example, as a result of illiquidity) or in areas where the choice of valuation model is
particularly subjective.
•
Inception profit (‘day 1 P&L reserves’): for financial instruments valued at inception, on the basis of one or
more significant unobservable inputs, the difference between transaction price and model value (as adjusted) at
inception is not recognised in the consolidated income statement, but is deferred and any unamortised balance is
included as part of the fair value.
Transaction costs are not included in the fair value calculation. Trade origination costs such as brokerage fees and
post-trade costs are included in operating expenses. The future costs of administering the OTC derivative portfolio
are also not included in fair value, but are expensed as incurred.
• Loans
Loans are valued from broker quotes and/or market data consensus providers where available. Where
unavailable, fair value will be determined based on an appropriate credit spread derived from other market
instruments issued by the same or comparable entities.
• Debt securities, treasury and other eligible bills, and equities
These instruments are valued based on quoted market prices from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group
or pricing service, where available. Where unavailable, fair value is determined by reference to quoted market
prices for similar instruments or, in the case of certain mortgage-backed securities and unquoted equities,
valuation techniques using inputs derived from observable market data, and, where relevant, assumptions in
respect of unobservable inputs.
• Derivatives
Over-the-counter (i.e. non-exchange traded) derivatives are valued using valuation models. Valuation models
calculate the present value of expected future cash flows, based upon ‘no-arbitrage’ principles. For many vanilla
derivative products, such as interest rate swaps and European options, the modelling approaches used are
standard across the industry. For more complex derivative products, there may be some discrepancy in practice.
Inputs to valuation models are determined from observable market data wherever possible, including prices
available from exchanges, dealers, brokers or providers of consensus pricing. Certain inputs may not be
observable in the market directly, but can be determined from observable prices via model calibration
procedures. Finally, some inputs are not observable, but can generally be estimated from historic data or other
sources. Examples of inputs that are generally observable include foreign exchange spot and forward rates,
benchmark interest rate curves and volatility surfaces for commonly traded option products. Examples of inputs
that may be unobservable include volatility surfaces, in whole or in part, for less commonly traded option
products, and correlations between market factors.
427
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 33
• Private equity
HSBC’s private equity positions are generally classified as available-for-sale and are not traded in an active
market. In the absence of an active market for the investment, fair value is estimated based upon an analysis
of the investee’s financial position and results, risk profile, prospects and other factors as well as reference to
market valuations for similar entities quoted in an active market, or the price at which similar companies have
changed ownership. The exercise of judgement is required because of uncertainties inherent in estimating fair
value for private equity investments.
HSBC
Analysis of fair value determination
The following table provides an analysis of the basis for valuing financial assets and financial liabilities measured at
fair value in the consolidated financial statements:
At 31 December 2007
Assets
Trading assets ...............................................................
Financial assets designated at fair value .......................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Financial investments: available-for-sale .....................
Liabilities
Trading liabilities ..........................................................
Financial liabilities at fair value ...................................
Derivatives ....................................................................
At 31 December 2006
Assets
Trading assets ...............................................................
Financial assets designated at fair value .......................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Financial investments: available-for-sale .....................
Liabilities
Trading liabilities ..........................................................
Financial liabilities at fair value ...................................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Quoted
market
price
US$m
Valuation techniques:
using
observable
with significant
non-observable
inputs
US$m
inputs
US$m
209,339
28,565
8,132
77,045
140,629
37,709
8,879
166,515
16,277
4,903
60,948
102,758
30,846
7,248
222,678
12,694
175,493
187,677
167,967
52,230
171,444
158,379
4,136
97,490
128,286
120,866
39,365
92,865
13,951
305
4,229
8,510
5,984
–
3,070
3,253
160
1,309
6,201
2,984
–
1,365
Total
US$m
445,968
41,564
187,854
273,232
314,580
89,939
183,393
328,147
20,573
103,702
195,435
226,608
70,211
101,478
Trading assets valued using a valuation technique with significant non-observable inputs include leveraged loans
underwritten by HSBC, corporate and mortgage loans held for securitisation, and various asset-backed securities. The
amount of trading assets reported in this category is higher at 31 December 2007 compared with 31 December 2006
reflects an increase in the amount of leveraged loans held by HSBC, and also reduced liquidity in certain markets
during 2007, which affected the availability of market observable inputs for the valuation of certain types of loans
and asset-backed securities.
Trading liabilities valued using a valuation technique with significant non-observable inputs have increased as a
result of an increase in the issuance of structured note transactions, whereby HSBC issues equity-linked notes to
investors which provide the counterparty with a return that is linked to the performance of certain unlisted securities,
and holds the unlisted securities to match the liabilities.
Derivative products valued using a valuation technique with significant non-observable inputs include certain types
of correlation products, particularly equity and foreign exchange basket options and foreign exchange-interest rate
hybrid transactions, long-dated option transactions, particularly equity options, interest rate and foreign exchange
options and certain credit derivatives, including tranched credit default swap transactions and credit derivatives
executed with certain monoline insurers. Credit derivatives with these monoline insurers were included in the
category of valuation techniques using observable inputs at 31 December 2006 and in the non-observable inputs
category at 31 December 2007.
428
Available-for-sale financial investments and financial assets designated at fair value that are valued using
non-observable inputs include holdings of private equity and unlisted debt securities.
Effect of changes in significant non-observable assumptions to reasonably possible alternatives
As discussed above, the fair value of financial instruments are, in certain circumstances, measured using valuation
models that incorporate assumptions that are not supported by prices from observable current market transactions in
the same instrument and are not based on observable market data. The following table shows the sensitivity of fair
values to reasonably possible alternative assumptions.
At 31 December 2007
Derivatives/trading assets/trading liabilities1 ...............
Financial assets/liabilities designated at fair value ......
Financial investments: available-for-sale .....................
At 31 December 2006
Derivatives/trading assets/trading liabilities .................
Financial assets/liabilities designated at fair value ......
Financial investments: available-for-sale......................
Reflected in profit/(loss)
Reflected in equity
Favourable
Unfavourable
Favourable
changes
US$m
changes
US$m
changes
US$m
Unfavourable
changes
US$m
602
30
69
16
(415)
(30)
(72)
(16)
529
(591)
165
(165)
1 Derivatives, trading assets and trading liabilities are presented as one category to reflect the manner in which these financial
instruments are risk-managed.
The increase in the effect of changes in significant non-observable inputs in relation to derivatives/trading
assets/trading liabilities from 31 December 2006 to 31 December 2007 primarily reflects certain mortgage loans
acquired for the purpose of securitisation, and certain US mortgage-backed securities, that were valued using
observable inputs at 31 December 2006 that subsequently became non-observable in the second half of 2007
following the deterioration in market conditions. To a lesser degree, the increase also reflects increased uncertainty in
determining the fair value of credit derivative transactions executed against certain monoline insurers, and a general
increase in structured derivative business.
Changes in fair value recorded in the income statement
The following table details changes in fair values recognised in profit or loss during the period, where the fair value is
estimated using valuation techniques that incorporate significant assumptions that are not supported by prices from
observable current market transactions in the same instrument, and are not based on observable market data:
•
the table details the total change in fair value of these instruments; it does not isolate that component of the
change that is attributable to the non-observable component;
•
•
instruments valued with significant non-observable inputs are frequently dynamically hedged with instruments
valued using observable inputs; the table does not include any changes in fair value of these hedges; and
there were significant assets and liabilities valued using observable inputs at 31 December 2006 that became
valued with significant unobservable inputs during 2007; the table reflects the full change in fair value of those
instruments during 2007, not just that element arising following the category change.
At 31 December 2007
Derivatives/trading assets/trading liabilities ........................................................................................
Financial assets/liabilities designated at fair value ..............................................................................
Recorded profit/(loss)
2007
US$m
491
9
2006
US$m
(195)
(5)
The increase in fair value in 2007 primarily reflects increases in the fair value of credit derivatives purchased from
certain monoline insurers to provide credit protection on portfolios of securities, offset by write-downs in mortgage
loans acquired for the purpose of securitisation, and certain US mortgage-backed securities.
429
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 33
HSBC Holdings
The following table provides an analysis of the basis for valuing financial assets and financial liabilities measured at
fair value in the financial statements:
At 31 December 2007
Assets
Derivatives ....................................................................
Financial investments: available-for-sale .....................
Liabilities
Financial liabilities at fair value ...................................
Derivatives ....................................................................
At 31 December 2006
Assets
Derivatives ....................................................................
Financial investments: available-for-sale .....................
Liabilities
Financial liabilities at fair value ...................................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Quoted
market
price
US$m
Valuation techniques:
using
observable
with significant
non-observable
inputs
US$m
inputs
US$m
–
346
18,683
–
–
299
14,070
–
2,660
–
–
44
1,599
–
–
177
–
2,676
–
–
–
3,315
–
–
Total
US$m
2,660
3,022
18,683
44
1,599
3,614
14,070
177
Financial investments measured using a valuation technique with significant non-observable inputs comprise fixed-
rate trust preferred securities and senior notes purchased from HSBC undertakings. The unobservable elements of the
valuation technique include the use of implied credit spreads and simplified bond pricing assumptions.
Movements in unobservable assumptions in fair value valuation models
As discussed above, the fair value of financial instruments are in certain circumstances measured using valuation
models that incorporate assumptions that are not supported by prices from observable current market transactions in
the same instrument and are not based on observable market data. The following table shows the sensitivity of non-
derivative financial instruments to reasonably possible alternative assumptions.
Reflected in equity
Favourable
changes
US$m
Unfavourable
changes
US$m
Financial investments available-for-sale
At 31 December 2007 .......................................................................................................................
At 31 December 2006 ........................................................................................................................
53
65
(52)
(64)
Fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value
The fair values of financial instruments that are not recognised at fair value on the balance sheet are calculated as
described below.
The calculation of fair value incorporates HSBC’s estimate of the amount at which financial assets could be
exchanged, or financial liabilities settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction. It
does not reflect the economic benefits and costs that HSBC expects to flow from the instruments’ cash flows over
their expected future lives. Other reporting entities may use different valuation methodologies and assumptions in
determining fair values for which no observable market prices are available, so comparisons of fair values between
entities may not be meaningful and users are advised to exercise caution when using this data.
In recent months, the unstable market conditions in the US mortgage lending industry have resulted in a significant
reduction in the secondary market demand for US consumer lending assets. Uncertainty over the extent and timing of
future credit losses, together with an absence of liquidity for non-prime asset-backed securities, were reflected in a
lack of bid prices other than at distressed levels at 31 December 2007. It is not possible to distinguish from these
indicative market prices the relative discount that reflects cash flow impairment due to expected losses to maturity,
430
from the discount that the market is demanding for holding an illiquid asset. Under IFRSs, HSBC recognises loan
impairment based on losses incurred up to the balance sheet date: no recognition is given to losses which are expected
to arise in the future, but where the loss event has not yet occurred. Neither is the asset written down to reflect its
illiquidity as the intention is to fund the asset until the earlier of its prepayment, charge-off or repayment on maturity.
Market fair values reflect not only incurred loss, but also loss expected through the life of the asset, as well as a
discount for illiquidity and a credit spread which reflects the market’s current risk preference rather than the credit
spread which existed in the market at the time the loan was underwritten.
The estimated fair values at 31 December 2007 of loans and advances to customers in North America reflect the
combined effect of these conditions. This results in fair values that are substantially lower than the carrying value of
customer loans held on-balance sheet and lower than would otherwise be reported under more normal market
conditions. Accordingly, the fair values reported do not reflect HSBC’s estimate of the underlying long-term value of
the assets.
The following types of financial instruments are measured at amortised cost unless they are held for trading or
designated at fair value through profit or loss. Where assets or liabilities are hedged by derivatives designated and
qualifying as fair value hedges, the carrying value of the assets or liabilities so hedged includes a fair value
adjustment for the hedged risk only. Fair values at the balance sheet date of the assets and liabilities set out below are
estimated for the purpose of disclosure as follows:
(i) Loans and advances to banks and customers
The fair value of loans and advances is based on observable market transactions, where available. In the absence
of observable market transactions, fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models. Performing loans
are grouped, as far as possible, into homogeneous pools segregated by maturity and coupon rates. In general,
contractual cash flows are discounted using HSBC’s estimate of the discount rate that a market participant would
use in valuing instruments with similar maturity, repricing and credit risk characteristics.
The fair value of a loan portfolio reflects both loan impairments at the balance sheet date and estimates of market
participants’ expectations of credit losses over the life of the loans.
For impaired loans, fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows over the time period they are
expected to be recovered.
(ii) Financial investments
The fair values of listed financial investments are determined using bid market prices. The fair values of unlisted
financial investments are determined using valuation techniques that take into consideration either the prices of,
or future earnings streams of, equivalent quoted securities.
(iii) Deposits by banks and customer accounts
For the purposes of estimating fair value, deposits by banks and customer accounts are grouped by residual
maturity. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows, applying current rates offered for deposits of
similar remaining maturities. The fair value of a deposit repayable on demand is assumed to be the amount
payable on demand at the balance sheet date.
(iv) Debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities
Fair values are determined using quoted market prices at the balance sheet date where available, or by reference
to quoted market prices for similar instruments.
The fair values in this note are stated at a specific date and may be significantly different from the amounts which
will actually be paid on the maturity or settlement dates of the instruments. In many cases, it would not be possible to
realise immediately the estimated fair values given the size of the portfolios measured. Accordingly, these fair values
do not represent the value of these financial instruments to HSBC as a going concern.
For all classes of financial instruments, fair value represents the product of the value of a single instrument,
multiplied by the number of instruments held. No block discount or premium adjustments are made.
431
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 33 and 34
The fair values of intangible assets, such as values placed on portfolios of core deposits, credit card and customer
relationships, are not included above because they are not financial instruments.
The following table lists financial instruments whose carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value
because, for example, they are short-term in nature or reprice to current market rates frequently:
Assets
Cash and balances at central banks
Items in the course of collection from other banks
Hong Kong Government certificates of indebtedness
Endorsements and acceptances
Short-term receivables within ‘Other assets’
Accrued income
HSBC
Liabilities
Hong Kong currency notes in circulation
Items in the course of transmission to other banks
Endorsements and acceptances
Short-term payables within ‘Other liabilities’
Accruals
The following table provides an analysis of the fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value on the
balance sheet:
Assets
Loans and advances to banks .......................................
Loans and advances to customers .................................
Financial investments: Treasury and
other eligible bills .....................................................
Financial investments: debt securities ..........................
Liabilities
Deposits by banks .........................................................
Customer accounts ........................................................
Debt securities in issue .................................................
Subordinated liabilities .................................................
2007
Carrying
amount
US$m
237,366
981,548
–
9,768
132,181
1,096,140
246,579
24,819
Fair
value
US$m
237,374
951,850
–
10,154
132,165
1,095,727
243,802
23,853
2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
185,205
868,133
45
9,326
99,694
896,834
230,325
22,672
Fair
value
US$m
185,151
864,320
45
9,628
99,691
896,429
231,189
22,468
The following table provides an analysis of the fair value of financial investments classified as held for sale which are
not carried at fair value on the balance sheet:
Assets classified as held for sale
Loans and advances to banks .......................................
Loans and advances to customers .................................
Financial investments: Debt securities .........................
2007
Carrying
amount
US$m
14
–
27
Fair
value
US$m
14
–
27
2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
–
634
–
The following table provides an analysis of loans and advances to customers by geographical segment:
Loans and advances to customers
Europe ...........................................................................
Hong Hong ....................................................................
Rest of Asia-Pacific ......................................................
North America1 .............................................................
Latin America ...............................................................
2007
Carrying
amount
US$m
452,275
89,638
101,852
289,860
47,923
981,548
Fair
value
US$m
450,010
89,908
101,860
262,123
47,949
951,850
2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
392,499
84,282
77,574
277,987
35,791
868,133
Fair
value
US$m
–
630
–
Fair
value
US$m
392,806
84,659
77,429
273,903
35,523
864,320
1 The reasons for the significant difference between carrying amount and fair value of loans and advances to customers in North America
are discussed on pages 430 to 431.
432
HSBC Holdings
The methods used by HSBC Holdings to determine fair values of financial instruments for the purpose of
measurement and disclosure are described above.
The following table provides an analysis of the fair value of financial instruments not carried at fair value on the
balance sheet:
Assets
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings ................
Liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ........................
Subordinated liabilities .................................................
34 Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities
2007
Carrying
amount
US$m
Fair
value
US$m
2006
Carrying
amount
US$m
Fair
value
US$m
17,242
17,356
14,456
14,537
2,969
8,544
2,992
8,609
3,100
8,423
3,155
9,439
The following is an analysis, by remaining contractual maturities at the balance sheet date, of asset and liability line
items that represent amounts expected to be recovered or settled within one year, and after more than one year.
Trading assets and liabilities are excluded because they are not held for collection or settlement over the period of
contractual maturity.
HSBC
Assets
Financial assets designated at fair value .........................................................
Loans and advances to banks1 .........................................................................
Loans and advances to customers ...................................................................
Financial investments ......................................................................................
Other financial assets .......................................................................................
Liabilities
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ....................................................
Debt securities in issue ....................................................................................
Other financial liabilities .................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ....................................................................................
At 31 December 2007
Due after
more than
one year
US$m
35,812
14,692
543,302
179,508
6,390
779,704
7,706
29,992
83,722
102,928
4,352
24,478
253,178
Due within
one year
US$m
5,752
222,674
438,246
103,492
24,087
794,251
124,475
1,066,148
6,217
143,651
33,056
341
1,373,888
Total
US$m
41,564
237,366
981,548
283,000
30,477
1,573,955
132,181
1,096,140
89,939
246,579
37,408
24,819
1,627,066
433
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 34 and 35
Assets
Financial assets designated at fair value ..........................................................
Loans and advances to banks1 .........................................................................
Loans and advances to customers ....................................................................
Financial investments ......................................................................................
Other financial assets .......................................................................................
Liabilities
Deposits by banks ............................................................................................
Customer accounts ...........................................................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ....................................................
Debt securities in issue ....................................................................................
Other financial liabilities .................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ....................................................................................
At 31 December 2006
Due within
one year
US$m
3,735
179,240
360,191
87,848
20,833
651,847
89,043
871,881
1,410
111,622
25,938
326
1,100,220
Due after
more than
one year
US$m
16,838
5,965
507,942
116,958
6,422
654,125
10,651
24,953
68,801
118,703
2,197
22,346
247,651
Total
US$m
20,573
185,205
868,133
204,806
27,255
1,305,972
99,694
896,834
70,211
230,325
28,135
22,672
1,347,871
1 ‘Loans and advances to banks’ includes US$189,081 million (2006: US$147,512 million) which is repayable on demand or at short
notice.
HSBC Holdings
At 31 December 2007
Due within
one year
US$m
Due after
more than
one year
US$m
7,371
346
21
7,738
1,906
–
1,397
–
3,303
Due within
one year
US$m
6,886
–
25
6,911
301
–
1,507
–
1,808
9,871
2,676
–
12,547
1,063
18,683
8
8,544
28,298
At 31 December 2006
Due after
more than
one year
US$m
7,570
3,614
–
11,184
2,799
14,070
10
8,423
25,302
Total
US$m
17,242
3,022
21
20,285
2,969
18,683
1,405
8,544
31,601
Total
US$m
14,456
3,614
25
18,095
3,100
14,070
1,517
8,423
27,110
Assets
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings ...................................................
Financial investments ......................................................................................
Other financial assets .......................................................................................
Liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ...........................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ....................................................
Other financial liabilities .................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ....................................................................................
Assets
Loans and advances to HSBC undertakings ...................................................
Financial investments ......................................................................................
Other financial assets .......................................................................................
Liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ...........................................................
Financial liabilities designated at fair value ....................................................
Other financial liabilities .................................................................................
Subordinated liabilities ....................................................................................
434
35 Foreign exchange exposures
Structural foreign exchange exposures
HSBC’s structural foreign exchange exposures are represented by the net asset value of its foreign exchange equity
and subordinated debt investments in subsidiaries, branches, joint ventures and associates. Gains or losses on
structural foreign exchange exposures are recognised directly in equity. HSBC’s management of its structural foreign
exchange exposures is discussed in the ‘Report of the Directors: The Management of Risk’ on page 256.
In its separate financial statements, HSBC Holdings recognises its foreign exchange gains and losses on structural
foreign exchange exposures in the income statement.
Net structural foreign exchange exposures
Currency of structural exposure
Pound sterling ....................................................................................................................................
Euro ....................................................................................................................................................
Chinese renminbi ...............................................................................................................................
Mexican pesos ...................................................................................................................................
Hong Kong dollars ............................................................................................................................
Canadian dollars ................................................................................................................................
Brazilian reais ....................................................................................................................................
Indian rupees ......................................................................................................................................
Swiss francs .......................................................................................................................................
UAE dirhams .....................................................................................................................................
Turkish lira .........................................................................................................................................
Korean won ........................................................................................................................................
Malaysian ringgit ...............................................................................................................................
Australian dollars ...............................................................................................................................
Philippine pesos .................................................................................................................................
Singapore dollars ...............................................................................................................................
Saudi riyals1 .......................................................................................................................................
Egyptian pounds ................................................................................................................................
Thai baht ............................................................................................................................................
Taiwanese dollars ..............................................................................................................................
Costa Rican colon ..............................................................................................................................
Argentine pesos .................................................................................................................................
Vietnamese dong ...............................................................................................................................
Honduran lempira ..............................................................................................................................
Japanese yen ......................................................................................................................................
Maltese lira ........................................................................................................................................
Indonesia rupiah ................................................................................................................................
Chilean pesos .....................................................................................................................................
Colombian peso .................................................................................................................................
Qatari rial ...........................................................................................................................................
New Zealand dollars ..........................................................................................................................
South African rand ............................................................................................................................
Omani rial ..........................................................................................................................................
Jordanian dinar ..................................................................................................................................
Russian rouble ...................................................................................................................................
Bahraini dinar ....................................................................................................................................
Others, each less than US$100 million .............................................................................................
Total ...................................................................................................................................................
2007
US$m
24,527
23,985
10,892
5,247
4,635
4,136
4,007
2,699
2,657
2,182
1,796
1,282
1,044
940
459
432
404
392
384
382
375
370
331
325
300
270
221
214
202
197
169
148
140
116
114
106
686
96,766
2006
US$m
18,562
21,202
5,678
4,536
4,461
3,284
2,684
1,575
2,495
1,647
970
769
876
692
213
411
286
325
305
299
162
211
57
148
338
269
155
189
86
150
158
106
114
92
92
90
514
74,201
1 After deducting sales of Saudi riyals amounting to US$750 million (2006: US$750 million) in order to manage the foreign exchange risk
of the investments.
All resulting exchange differences on consolidation of foreign operations are recognised in a separate component of
equity. Shareholders’ equity would decrease by US$2,426 million (2006: US$1,988 million) if euro and sterling
foreign currency exchange rates weakened by 5 per cent relative to the US dollar.
435
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 36, 37 and 38
36 Assets charged as security for liabilities and collateral accepted as security for assets
Financial assets pledged to secure liabilities were as follows:
Treasury bills and other eligible securities ........................................................................................
Loans and advances to banks ............................................................................................................
Loans and advances to customers ......................................................................................................
Debt securities ...................................................................................................................................
Equity shares ......................................................................................................................................
Other ..................................................................................................................................................
Assets pledged at
31 December
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
7,200
7,389
78,755
219,956
19,257
3,933
336,490
6,480
934
63,956
106,652
11,634
390
190,046
These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to standard securities lending and
repurchase agreements.
Collateral accepted as security for assets
The fair value of assets accepted as collateral that HSBC is permitted to sell or repledge in the absence of default is
US$329,893 million (2006: US$188,008 million). The fair value of any such collateral that has been sold or
repledged was US$212,956 million (2006: US$135,998 million). HSBC is obliged to return equivalent securities.
These transactions are conducted under terms that are usual and customary to standard securities borrowing and
reverse repurchase agreements.
37 Minority interests
Minority interests attributable to holders of ordinary shares in subsidiaries ....................................
Preference shares issued by subsidiaries ...........................................................................................
Preference shares issued by subsidiaries
US$575m
US$518m
US$374m
US$374m
CAD175m
CAD175m
US$150m
US$150m
US$125m
6.36% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series B1 .................................................
Floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series F2 .......................................
Floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series G3........................................
6.50% non-cumulative preferred stock, Series H3 .................................................
Non-cumulative redeemable class 1 preferred shares, Series C4............................
Non-cumulative class 1 preferred shares, Series D4 ..............................................
Depositary shares each representing 25% interest in a share of
adjustable-rate cumulative preferred stock, Series D5 .......................................
Cumulative preferred stock6 ...................................................................................
Dutch auction rate transferable securities preferred stock, Series A and B7 ..........
2007
US$m
4,775
2,481
7,256
2007
US$m
559
518
374
374
178
178
150
150
–
2006
US$m
4,026
2,550
6,576
2006
US$m
559
518
374
374
150
150
150
150
125
2,481
2,550
1 The Series B preferred stock is redeemable at the option of HSBC Finance Corporation, in whole or in part, from 24 June 2010 at par.
2 The Series F preferred stock is redeemable at par at the option of HSBC USA Inc., in whole or in part, on any dividend payment date on
or after 7 April 2010.
3 The Series G and Series H preferred stock are redeemable at par at the option of HSBC USA Inc., in whole or in part, at any time from
1 January 2011 and 1 July 2011, respectively.
4 The Series C and Series D preferred stock are redeemable at a declining premium above par at the option of HSBC Bank Canada, in
whole or in part, from 30 June 2010 and 31 December 2010, respectively.
5 The preferred stock has been redeemable at the option of HSBC USA Inc., in whole or in part, from 1 July 1999 at par.
6 The preferred stock has been redeemable at the option of HSBC USA Inc., in whole or in part, from 1 October 2007 at par.
7 The preferred stock of each series is redeemable at the option of HSBC USA Inc., in whole or in part, on any dividend payment date at
par. This was redeemed in full in 2007.
436
All redemptions are subject to the prior ‘non-objection’ of the Financial Services Authority and, where relevant, the
local banking regulator.
38 Called up share capital
Authorised
The authorised ordinary share capital of HSBC Holdings at 31 December 2007 and 2006 was US$7,500 million
divided into 15,000 million ordinary shares of US$0.50 each.
At 31 December 2007 and 2006, the authorised preference share capital of HSBC Holdings was 10 million non-
cumulative preference shares of £0.01 each, 10 million non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 each, and
10 million non-cumulative preference shares of €0.01 each.
At 31 December 2007 and 2006, the authorised non-voting deferred share capital of HSBC Holdings was £301,500
divided into 301,500 non-voting deferred shares of £1 each.
Issued
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares .......................................................................................................
2007
US$m
5,915
Number
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares
At 1 January 2007 ..............................................................................................................................
Shares issued under HSBC Finance share plans ...............................................................................
Shares issued under HSBC employee share plans ............................................................................
Shares issued in lieu of dividends .....................................................................................................
11,572,207,735
685,005
32,620,922
223,538,655
At 31 December 2007 ........................................................................................................................
11,829,052,317
At 1 January 2006 ..............................................................................................................................
Shares issued in connection with the maturity of HSBC Finance
8.875 per cent Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity Security Units .............................................
Shares issued under HSBC Finance share plans ...............................................................................
Shares issued under HSBC employee share plans ............................................................................
Shares issued in lieu of dividends .....................................................................................................
11,333,603,942
3,424,742
643,520
75,956,784
158,578,747
2006
US$m
5,786
US$m
5,786
–
17
112
5,915
5,667
2
–
38
79
At 31 December 2006 ........................................................................................................................
11,572,207,735
5,786
All ordinary shares confer identical rights in respect of capital, dividends, voting and otherwise.
HSBC Holdings non-cumulative preference shares of US$0.01 each
At 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2007 .......................................................................................
At 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2006 .......................................................................................
Number
US$m
1,450,000
1,450,000
–
–
Dividends on HSBC Holdings non-cumulative dollar preference shares are paid quarterly at the sole and absolute
discretion of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors will not declare a dividend on the preference shares if
payment of the dividend would cause HSBC Holdings not to meet the applicable capital adequacy requirements of
the FSA or the profit of HSBC Holdings available for distribution as dividends is not sufficient to enable HSBC
Holdings to pay in full both dividends on the preference shares and dividends on any other shares that are scheduled
to be paid on the same date and that have an equal right to dividends. HSBC Holdings may not declare or pay
dividends on any class of its shares ranking lower in the right to dividends than the preference shares nor redeem nor
purchase in any manner any of its other shares ranking equal with or lower than the preference shares unless it has
paid in full, or set aside an amount to provide for payment in full, the dividends on the preference shares for the then-
current dividend period. The preference shares carry no rights to conversion into ordinary shares of HSBC Holdings.
Holders of the preference shares will only be entitled to attend and vote at general meetings of shareholders of HSBC
Holdings if the dividend payable on the preference shares has not been paid in full for four consecutive dividend
payment dates. In such circumstances, holders of preference shares will be entitled to vote on all matters put to
general meetings until such time as HSBC Holdings has paid a full dividend on the preference shares. HSBC
Holdings may redeem the preference shares in whole at any time on or after 16 December 2010, subject to the prior
‘non-objection’ of the FSA.
437
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 38
HSBC Holdings non-voting deferred shares
The 301,500 non-voting deferred shares were in issue throughout 2006 and 2007 and are held by a subsidiary of
HSBC Holdings. Holders of the non-voting deferred shares are not entitled to receive dividends on these shares. In
addition, on winding-up or other return of capital, holders are entitled to receive the amount paid up on their shares
after distribution to ordinary shareholders of £10 million in respect of each ordinary share held by them.
Shares under option
Details of the options outstanding to subscribe for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under the HSBC Holdings Group
Share Option Plan, HSBC Holdings Executive Share Option Scheme, the HSBC Share Plan and HSBC Holdings
savings-related share option plans are given in Note 10. In aggregate, options outstanding under these plans were as
follows:
31 December 2007 .......................................
31 December 2006 ........................................
Number of
HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares
240,726,775
12,839,412
823,472
6,324,920
269,423,027
6,661,998
270,473
2,932,100
Period of exercise
Exercise price
2008 to 2015
2008 to 2013
2008 to 2013
2008 to 2013
£5.3496 – 9.642
HK$103.4401 – 108.4483
€10.4217 – 11.0062
US$13.3290 – 14.7478
2007 to 2015
2007 to 2012
2007 to 2012
2007 to 2012
£5.0160 – 9.642
HK$103.4401
€11.0062
US$13.3290 – 14.1621
31 December 2005 ........................................
341,281,540
2006 to 2015
£2.1727 – 9.642
HSBC France and subsidiary company plans
Following the acquisition of HSBC France in 2000, outstanding employee share options over HSBC France shares
vested. On exercise of the options, the HSBC France shares are exchangeable for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in
the same ratio as for the acquisition of HSBC France (13 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares for each HSBC France
share).
During 2007, 280,850 (2006: 445,115) HSBC France shares were issued following the exercise of employee share
options and were exchanged for 3,651,050 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares. These shares were delivered from The
HSBC Holdings Employee Benefit Trust 2001 (No. 1) (2006: 5,786,495 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares). During
2007, no options over HSBC France shares lapsed (2006: nil). During 2006 and 2007, no HSBC France shares
previously issued following the exercise of employee share options were exchanged for HSBC Holdings ordinary
shares. At 31 December 2007, The HSBC Holdings Employee Benefit Trust 2001 (No. 1) held 11,665,278 (2006:
15,316,328) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares which may be exchanged for HSBC France shares arising from the
exercise of options.
HSBC France options effectively outstanding over HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under this arrangement were as
follows:
Number of
HSBC France
shares exchangeable
for HSBC Holdings
31 December 2007 ...............................................
31 December 2006 ................................................
31 December 2005 ................................................
1,007,031
1,287,881
1,732,996
2008 to 2010
2007 to 2010
2006 to 2010
€73.50 – 142.50
€37.05 – 142.50
€35.52 – 142.50
ordinary shares
Period of exercise
Exercise price
HSBC Private Bank France plan
There also exist outstanding options over the shares of HSBC Private Bank France, a subsidiary of HSBC France,
which are exchangeable for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares, the details of which are set out in the Directors’ Report
on pages 313 and 314 and are summarised below.
438
On exercise of options over shares of HSBC Private Bank France, the HSBC Private Bank France shares are
exchangeable for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in the ratio of 1.83 HSBC Holdings shares for each HSBC Private
Bank France share. During 2007, 61,880 (2006: 194,804) HSBC Private Bank France shares were issued following
the exercise of employee share options and exchanged for 113,234 (2006: 356,472) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares,
such shares being delivered from The CCF Employee Benefit Trust 2001 (Private Banking France). During 2007, no
options over HSBC Private Bank France shares lapsed (2006: nil). During 2007, 8,819 (2006: 6,000) HSBC Private
Bank France shares previously issued following the exercise of employee share options were exchanged for 16,137
(2006: 10,980) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares. At 31 December 2007, no (2006: 8,819) HSBC Private Bank France
shares previously issued following the exercise of employees’ share options were exchanged for HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares. There were 340,976 HSBC Private Bank France employee share options exchangeable for HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares outstanding at 31 December 2007 (2006: 402,856). At 31 December 2007, The CCF
Employee Benefit Trust 2001 (Private Banking France) held 955,952 (2006: 1,085,323) HSBC Holdings ordinary
shares which may be exchanged for HSBC Private Bank France shares arising from the exercise of options.
HSBC Private Bank France options (including shares issued but not exchanged) effectively outstanding over HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares under this arrangement were as follows:
Number of HSBC
Private Bank France
shares exchangeable
for HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares
31 December 2007 ...............................................
31 December 2006 ................................................
31 December 2005 ................................................
340,976
411,675
612,479
Banque Hervet plan
Period of exercise
2008 to 2012
2007 to 2012
2006 to 2012
Exercise price
€10.84 – 22.22
€10.84 – 22.22
€10.84 – 22.22
On the acquisition of Banque Hervet in 2001, Banque Hervet shares were held in a Plan d’Epargne Entreprise on
behalf of Banque Hervet employees to vest and be released to employees over a 5 year period. It was agreed to
exchange these Banque Hervet shares, on vesting, for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in the ratio of 3.46 HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares for each Banque Hervet share. During 2007, no (2006: 163,369) Banque Hervet shares were
released in connection with the vesting of interests in the Plan d’Epargne Entreprise and exchanged for any (2006:
565,151) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares, such shares being delivered from The CCF Employee Benefit Trust 2001
(Banque Hervet). At 31 December 2007, The CCF Employee Benefit Trust 2001 (Banque Hervet) held no (2006: nil)
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares.
Banque Hervet shares to be exchanged for HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under this arrangement were as follows:
31 December 2007 ...............................................................................................
31 December 2006 ................................................................................................
31 December 2005 ................................................................................................
–
–
169,416
Number of Banque
Hervet shares
exchangeable for
HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares
Period of vesting
–
–
2006
HSBC Finance and subsidiary company plans
Following the acquisition of HSBC Finance in 2003, all outstanding options and equity-based awards over HSBC
Finance common shares were converted into rights to receive HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in the same ratio as the
share exchange offer for HSBC Finance (2.675 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares for each HSBC Finance common
share) and the exercise prices per share adjusted accordingly. During 2007, options over 5,370,104 (2006:
10,484,937) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares were exercised and 4,602,172 (2006: 9,781,228) HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares delivered from The HSBC (Household) Employee Benefit Trust 2003 to satisfy the exercise of
these options. During 2007, options over 399,823 (2006: 300,555) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares lapsed. At
31 December 2007, The HSBC (Household) Employee Benefit Trust 2003 held a total of 1,856,417 (2006:
3,226,216) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares and 196,455 (2006: 198,665) ADSs, each of which represents five HSBC
Holdings ordinary shares, which may be used to satisfy the exercise of these options and equity-based awards under
the HSBC Finance share plans.
439
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 38 and 39
Options and equity-based awards outstanding over HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under the HSBC Finance share
plans were as follows:
31 December 2007 ...............................................
31 December 2006 ................................................
31 December 2005 ................................................
Number of
HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares
21,728,010
27,497,937
38,107,930
Period of exercise
Exercise price
2008 to 2012
2007 to 2012
2006 to 2012
nil – US$21.37
nil – US$21.37
nil – US$21.37
Prior to its acquisition by HSBC Holdings, HSBC Finance issued 8.875 per cent Adjustable Conversion-Rate Equity
Security Units (‘Units’) which included a contract under which the holder agreed to purchase, for US$25 each, HSBC
Finance common shares on 15 February 2006, with an option for early settlement. The Units which remained
outstanding following the acquisition of HSBC Finance were converted into contracts to purchase HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares. Units exercised at maturity, 15 February 2006, entitled the holder to receive a number of shares
based on the market value of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares at the time, which was 2.6041 HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares for each Unit. During 2007, no (2006: 3,424,742) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares were issued in
connection with the maturity of any (2006: 1,315,140) Units.
The maximum number of Units outstanding over HSBC Holdings ordinary shares were as follows:
Number of Units
exchangeable for
HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares
–
–
1,315,140
Period of exercise
Exercise price
–
–
2006
–
–
US$8.00 – US$9.60
31 December 2007 ...............................................
31 December 2006 ................................................
31 December 2005 ................................................
Bank of Bermuda plan
Following the acquisition of Bank of Bermuda in 2004, all outstanding employee share options over Bank of
Bermuda shares were converted into rights to receive HSBC Holdings ordinary shares based on the consideration of
US$40 for each Bank of Bermuda share and the average closing price of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares, derived
from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official List, for the five business days preceding the closing date of the
acquisition. During 2007, options over 377,046 HSBC Holdings ordinary shares were exercised (2006: 529,233) and
delivered from the HSBC (Bank of Bermuda) Employee Benefit Trust 2004 to satisfy the exercise of these options.
During 2007, options over 11,228 (2006: 126,854) HSBC Holdings ordinary shares lapsed. At 31 December 2007,
the HSBC (Bank of Bermuda) Employee Benefit Trust 2004 held 1,889,903 (2006: 2,266,949) HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares which may be used to satisfy the exercise of options.
Options outstanding over HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under the Bank of Bermuda share plans were as follows:
31 December 2007 ...............................................
31 December 2006 ................................................
31 December 2005 ................................................
Number of HSBC
Holdings
ordinary shares
2,322,094
2,710,368
3,366,455
Period of exercise
Exercise price
2008 to 2013
2007 to 2013
2006 to 2013
US$7.04 – 18.35
US$7.04 – 18.35
US$7.04 – 18.35
The maximum obligation at 31 December 2007 to deliver HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under all of the above
option arrangements, together with Performance Share and Restricted Share awards under the HSBC Holdings
Restricted Share Plan 2000 and The HSBC Share Plan, was 417,044,591 (2006: 435,602,017). The total number of
shares at 31 December 2007 held by employee benefit trusts that may be used to satisfy such obligations to deliver
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares was 149,423,898 (2006: 133,346,569).
440
7
7
4
1
5
3
,
4
5
5
4
,
0
2
)
0
1
5
(
)
9
2
0
,
1
1
(
2
7
3
7
6
1
,
2
6
4
9
,
5
1
8
3
,
1
)
6
2
6
,
3
(
7
)
8
3
(
0
7
8
)
6
2
2
(
–
–
–
)
8
8
7
(
2
2
3
,
1
–
–
)
7
6
(
8
9
1
9
3
2
)
4
1
(
–
–
)
1
9
(
)
0
1
(
–
)
9
0
1
(
)
9
0
1
(
7
7
4
1
5
3
,
4
3
3
1
,
9
1
)
0
1
5
(
)
1
4
2
,
0
1
(
2
7
3
4
3
2
,
2
8
4
7
,
5
2
4
1
,
1
)
2
1
6
,
3
(
7
3
5
0
7
8
)
6
1
2
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
1
5
7
(
0
7
8
)
2
6
2
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6
2
–
2
2
7
,
5
l
a
t
o
T
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
3
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
y
t
i
r
o
n
i
M
l
a
t
o
T
-
e
r
a
h
s
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
$
S
U
4
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
M
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
e
3
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
m
$
S
U
m
$
S
U
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
-
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
s
a
b
n
g
i
e
r
o
F
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
C
e
l
a
s
-
r
o
f
-
e
l
b
a
l
i
a
v
A
8
2
9
,
4
1
1
6
7
5
,
6
2
5
3
,
8
0
1
8
5
0
,
1
2
1
1
1
,
2
7
0
3
,
4
)
1
0
1
(
5
0
0
,
2
7
0
0
2
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
h
t
O
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
8
2
(
6
1
6
1
9
2
6
2
5
)
9
9
8
,
1
(
)
3
1
7
,
1
(
–
–
)
6
(
8
2
3
7
4
–
–
–
1
1
3
)
1
9
2
(
–
0
5
8
–
m
$
S
U
7
9
3
,
5
6
4
5
3
,
4
3
3
1
,
9
1
)
0
1
5
(
)
1
4
2
,
0
1
(
–
–
2
7
3
4
3
2
,
2
9
5
4
,
5
–
8
5
7
0
2
3
)
0
2
7
(
)
9
5
4
,
5
(
–
2
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
e
r
a
h
S
1
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
m
$
S
U
0
6
4
9
8
7
,
7
e
r
a
h
s
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
m
$
S
U
7
1
6
8
7
,
5
p
u
d
e
l
l
a
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
t
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
n
a
l
p
e
r
a
h
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
s
t
n
u
o
m
a
d
n
a
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
f
o
u
e
i
l
n
i
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
y
t
i
u
q
E
9
3
)
5
1
1
(
2
1
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
n
o
e
r
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
t
i
f
o
r
P
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
w
O
n
i
y
t
i
u
q
e
n
i
y
l
t
c
e
r
i
d
d
e
s
i
n
g
o
c
e
r
s
e
g
n
a
h
c
f
o
e
r
a
h
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
r
u
t
n
e
v
t
n
i
o
j
r
o
s
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a
f
o
y
t
i
u
q
e
e
h
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
n
a
l
p
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
d
e
n
i
f
e
d
n
o
)
s
e
s
s
o
l
(
/
s
n
i
a
g
l
a
i
r
a
u
t
c
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
c
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
s
n
i
a
g
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
F
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
h
t
o
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
d
r
a
w
a
e
r
a
h
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
g
n
a
r
r
a
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
t
s
o
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
m
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
o
r
f
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
r
o
o
t
y
l
t
c
e
r
i
d
n
e
k
a
t
s
m
e
t
i
n
o
x
a
T
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
T
,
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
n
o
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
y
t
i
r
o
n
i
m
n
i
e
s
a
e
r
c
n
i
t
e
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
i
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
d
n
a
s
l
a
s
o
p
s
i
d
f
o
g
n
i
t
s
e
v
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
e
s
p
a
l
d
n
a
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
441
6
1
4
,
5
3
1
6
5
2
,
7
0
6
1
,
8
2
1
8
5
0
,
1
2
8
6
9
,
1
5
5
0
,
0
1
)
7
1
9
(
7
9
0
,
1
8
4
3
1
,
8
5
1
9
,
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3
t
A
r
o
f
s
t
s
u
r
t
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
n
i
h
t
i
w
s
e
i
r
a
i
c
i
f
e
n
e
b
r
o
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
y
c
i
l
o
p
f
o
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
d
n
u
f
t
n
e
m
e
r
i
t
e
r
,
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
b
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
i
s
’
C
B
S
H
n
i
h
t
i
w
d
l
e
h
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
w
o
f
o
)
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
4
6
,
2
$
S
U
(
3
6
4
,
6
0
7
,
8
5
1
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
8
6
7
,
2
1
$
S
U
d
n
a
e
c
n
a
r
F
C
B
S
H
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
0
9
2
,
8
$
S
U
f
o
e
c
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
e
h
t
s
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
s
’
C
B
S
H
n
I
.
y
l
n
o
e
u
l
a
v
l
a
n
i
m
o
n
r
i
e
h
t
t
a
d
e
d
r
o
c
e
r
e
r
e
w
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
e
h
t
d
n
a
3
0
0
2
n
i
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
e
c
n
a
n
i
F
C
B
S
H
d
n
a
0
0
0
2
n
i
e
c
n
a
r
F
C
B
S
H
,
2
9
9
1
n
i
c
l
p
k
n
a
B
C
B
S
H
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
e
k
a
t
s
a
w
5
8
9
1
t
c
A
s
e
i
n
a
p
m
o
C
e
h
t
f
o
1
3
1
n
o
i
t
c
e
S
r
e
d
n
u
f
e
i
l
e
r
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
e
r
a
h
s
y
r
o
t
u
t
a
t
S
.
’
e
m
o
c
n
i
g
n
i
d
a
r
t
t
e
N
‘
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
2
8
,
1
$
S
U
d
n
a
’
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
t
e
N
‘
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
7
5
$
S
U
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
s
e
g
d
e
h
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
h
t
o
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
.
s
t
e
k
r
a
M
l
a
b
o
l
G
n
i
s
e
i
t
i
v
i
t
c
a
g
n
i
k
a
m
-
t
e
k
r
a
m
e
h
t
d
n
a
,
s
n
a
l
p
s
u
n
o
b
r
o
s
e
m
e
h
c
s
e
r
a
h
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
r
e
v
i
l
e
d
e
b
o
t
d
e
t
c
e
p
x
e
s
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
t
e
s
e
h
t
.
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
g
n
i
r
u
d
d
e
r
r
u
c
n
i
s
t
s
o
c
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
i
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
3
$
S
U
f
o
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
e
d
e
h
t
s
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
e
r
a
h
S
1
2
3
4
.
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
m
a
s
i
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
e
c
n
a
n
i
F
C
B
S
H
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
e
h
t
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
6
4
,
3
$
S
U
g
n
i
d
u
l
c
n
i
,
8
9
9
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
o
t
r
o
i
r
p
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
s
f
o
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
e
e
b
s
a
h
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
8
3
1
,
5
$
S
U
o
t
g
n
i
t
n
u
o
m
a
l
l
i
w
d
o
o
g
e
v
i
t
a
l
u
m
u
C
.
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
r
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
e
e
b
s
a
h
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
6
6
,
1
$
S
U
f
o
e
c
n
a
l
a
b
e
h
T
.
c
l
p
k
n
a
B
C
B
S
H
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
n
o
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
m
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 39
l
a
t
o
T
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
$
S
U
5
1
0
,
1
6
2
2
,
8
9
5
2
5
,
2
1
7
8
,
6
1
)
9
2
5
(
)
4
5
5
,
9
(
0
2
)
8
7
(
5
7
6
,
4
6
3
1
,
3
)
2
4
8
,
2
(
1
6
4
5
8
3
3
1
–
)
4
4
(
9
5
4
3
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
y
t
i
r
o
n
i
M
m
$
S
U
4
9
7
,
5
–
–
)
5
8
7
(
2
8
0
,
1
–
–
4
1
4
8
2
6
)
2
2
(
–
–
)
9
(
–
)
3
0
1
(
9
5
4
l
a
t
o
T
-
e
r
a
h
s
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
$
S
U
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
5
1
0
,
1
2
3
4
,
2
9
5
2
5
,
2
9
8
7
,
5
1
)
9
2
5
(
)
9
6
7
,
8
(
0
2
)
2
9
(
1
9
5
,
4
4
7
0
,
3
)
0
2
8
,
2
(
1
6
4
5
8
6
3
2
)
5
3
(
–
–
4
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
M
m
$
S
U
-
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
s
a
b
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
n
g
i
e
r
o
F
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
e
6
0
0
2
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
h
t
O
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
C
e
l
a
s
-
r
o
f
-
e
l
b
a
l
i
a
v
A
3
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
m
$
S
U
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
2
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
m
$
S
U
e
r
a
h
S
1
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
m
$
S
U
8
5
0
,
1
2
5
3
5
,
1
)
4
8
2
(
3
3
2
4
0
1
,
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
3
)
3
2
6
(
–
4
5
8
5
4
3
)
8
3
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6
2
5
6
5
,
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
8
(
0
6
5
,
1
)
9
1
2
,
2
(
9
8
)
1
0
6
(
4
1
5
,
1
–
–
2
3
2
3
8
–
–
–
)
9
(
)
3
(
)
9
8
(
–
–
3
2
2
,
6
5
8
2
5
,
2
9
8
7
,
5
1
)
9
2
5
(
)
9
6
7
,
8
(
–
–
0
2
)
2
9
(
6
4
4
,
4
–
4
8
6
)
2
0
1
(
)
5
5
3
(
)
6
4
4
,
4
(
–
)
2
8
(
5
7
9
6
9
8
,
6
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
e
r
a
h
s
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
m
$
S
U
7
6
6
,
5
0
4
9
7
p
u
d
e
l
l
a
C
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
t
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
n
a
l
p
e
r
a
h
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
n
o
e
r
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
t
i
f
o
r
P
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
w
O
s
t
n
u
o
m
a
d
n
a
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
f
o
u
e
i
l
n
i
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
n
i
y
t
i
u
q
e
n
i
y
l
t
c
e
r
i
d
d
e
s
i
n
g
o
c
e
r
s
e
g
n
a
h
c
f
o
e
r
a
h
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
r
u
t
n
e
v
t
n
i
o
j
r
o
s
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a
f
o
y
t
i
u
q
e
e
h
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
n
a
l
p
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
d
e
n
i
f
e
d
n
o
)
s
e
s
s
o
l
(
/
s
n
i
a
g
l
a
i
r
a
u
t
c
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
c
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
s
n
i
a
g
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
F
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
h
t
o
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
d
r
a
w
a
e
r
a
h
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
g
n
a
r
r
a
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
t
s
o
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
m
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
o
r
f
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
r
o
o
t
y
l
t
c
e
r
i
d
n
e
k
a
t
s
m
e
t
i
n
o
x
a
T
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
T
,
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
n
o
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
y
t
i
r
o
n
i
m
n
i
e
s
a
e
r
c
n
i
t
e
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
i
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
d
n
a
s
l
a
s
o
p
s
i
d
f
o
g
n
i
t
s
e
v
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
e
s
p
a
l
d
n
a
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
442
8
2
9
,
4
1
1
6
7
5
,
6
2
5
3
,
8
0
1
8
5
0
,
1
2
1
1
1
,
2
7
0
3
,
4
)
1
0
1
(
5
0
0
,
2
7
9
3
,
5
6
9
8
7
,
7
6
8
7
,
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3
t
A
s
t
s
u
r
t
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
n
i
h
t
i
w
s
e
i
r
a
i
c
i
f
e
n
e
b
r
o
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
y
c
i
l
o
p
f
o
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
d
n
u
f
t
n
e
m
e
r
i
t
e
r
,
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
b
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
i
s
’
C
B
S
H
n
i
h
t
i
w
d
l
e
h
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
w
o
f
o
)
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
5
0
3
,
2
$
S
U
(
2
0
1
,
3
2
3
,
8
4
1
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
h
t
i
w
m
r
o
f
n
o
c
o
t
d
e
t
a
t
s
e
r
n
e
e
b
e
v
a
h
s
r
e
b
m
u
n
6
0
0
2
.
s
t
e
k
r
a
M
l
a
b
o
l
G
n
i
s
e
i
t
i
v
i
t
c
a
g
n
i
k
a
m
-
t
e
k
r
a
m
e
h
t
d
n
a
,
s
n
a
l
p
s
u
n
o
b
r
o
s
e
m
e
h
c
s
e
r
a
h
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
r
e
v
i
l
e
d
e
b
o
t
d
e
t
c
e
p
x
e
s
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
t
e
s
e
h
t
r
o
f
.
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
g
n
i
r
u
d
d
e
r
r
u
c
n
i
s
t
s
o
c
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
i
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
3
$
S
U
f
o
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
e
d
e
h
t
s
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
e
r
a
h
S
.
n
o
i
t
a
t
n
e
s
e
r
p
s
’
r
a
e
y
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
e
h
t
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
8
6
7
,
2
1
$
S
U
d
n
a
e
c
n
a
r
F
C
B
S
H
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
0
9
2
,
8
$
S
U
f
o
e
c
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
e
h
t
s
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
s
’
C
B
S
H
n
I
.
y
l
n
o
e
u
l
a
v
l
a
n
i
m
o
n
r
i
e
h
t
t
a
d
e
d
r
o
c
e
r
e
r
e
w
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
e
h
t
d
n
a
3
0
0
2
n
i
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
e
c
n
a
n
i
F
C
B
S
H
d
n
a
0
0
0
2
n
i
e
c
n
a
r
F
C
B
S
H
,
2
9
9
1
n
i
c
l
p
k
n
a
B
C
B
S
H
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
e
k
a
t
s
a
w
5
8
9
1
t
c
A
s
e
i
n
a
p
m
o
C
e
h
t
f
o
1
3
1
n
o
i
t
c
e
S
r
e
d
n
u
f
e
i
l
e
r
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
e
r
a
h
s
y
r
o
t
u
t
a
t
S
.
’
e
m
o
c
n
i
g
n
i
d
a
r
t
t
e
N
‘
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
1
7
,
1
$
S
U
d
n
a
’
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
t
e
N
‘
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
7
4
$
S
U
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
s
e
g
d
e
h
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
h
t
o
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
.
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
m
a
s
i
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
e
c
n
a
n
i
F
C
B
S
H
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
1
2
3
4
e
h
t
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
6
4
,
3
$
S
U
g
n
i
d
u
l
c
n
i
,
8
9
9
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
o
t
r
o
i
r
p
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
s
f
o
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
e
e
b
s
a
h
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
8
3
1
,
5
$
S
U
o
t
g
n
i
t
n
u
o
m
a
l
l
i
w
d
o
o
g
e
v
i
t
a
l
u
m
u
C
.
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
r
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
e
e
b
s
a
h
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
6
6
,
1
$
S
U
f
o
e
c
n
a
l
a
b
e
h
T
.
c
l
p
k
n
a
B
C
B
S
H
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
n
o
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
m
l
a
t
o
T
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
$
S
U
0
9
6
)
4
2
8
,
8
(
7
9
1
,
9
9
1
1
8
,
1
5
0
4
,
1
)
1
3
4
(
)
9
3
4
,
8
(
3
7
8
,
5
1
1
6
1
)
2
1
8
(
)
7
5
2
,
4
(
)
2
9
4
(
)
6
4
3
(
)
8
7
1
(
0
4
5
)
2
4
3
(
7
3
4
–
m
$
S
U
y
t
i
r
o
n
i
M
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
5
7
6
,
3
1
)
7
7
0
,
0
1
(
–
–
–
2
9
7
)
9
8
6
(
–
–
8
)
2
7
(
)
8
7
(
)
4
1
(
–
–
–
–
6
1
3
3
2
,
2
6
2
2
,
8
9
3
3
2
,
2
4
9
7
,
5
l
a
t
o
T
-
e
r
a
h
s
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
$
S
U
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
0
9
6
3
5
2
,
1
2
2
5
,
5
8
1
1
8
,
1
5
0
4
,
1
)
1
3
4
(
)
0
5
7
,
7
(
1
8
0
,
5
1
1
6
1
)
0
2
8
(
)
5
8
1
,
4
(
)
4
1
4
(
)
2
3
3
(
)
8
7
1
(
0
4
5
)
2
4
3
(
1
2
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7
2
1
–
–
4
1
–
–
)
1
8
4
(
0
4
5
–
–
)
4
1
(
5
0
0
2
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
h
t
O
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
n
g
i
e
r
o
F
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
e
6
8
6
5
1
2
,
3
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
8
6
5
(
)
7
1
6
,
3
(
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
1
4
(
)
3
6
(
)
6
0
1
(
–
–
–
)
8
(
1
4
–
3
3
2
5
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
M
m
$
S
U
-
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
s
a
b
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
8
5
0
,
1
2
9
4
3
,
1
–
0
1
4
–
9
1
9
,
1
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
C
e
l
a
s
-
r
o
f
-
e
l
b
a
l
i
a
v
A
4
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
g
n
i
g
d
e
h
m
$
S
U
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
m
$
S
U
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
3
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
m
$
S
U
e
r
a
h
S
2
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
m
$
S
U
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
)
1
4
1
(
)
1
5
3
(
)
6
2
2
(
–
–
)
0
0
4
(
2
6
1
1
4
1
–
)
2
6
7
,
1
(
2
3
4
,
9
4
–
1
1
8
,
1
)
8
5
5
(
)
0
5
7
,
7
(
1
8
0
,
5
1
1
6
1
)
0
2
8
(
)
9
4
4
,
3
(
–
–
–
8
5
3
0
3
7
6
2
9
4
4
,
3
–
2
6
6
1
8
8
,
4
)
2
5
(
5
0
4
,
1
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
2
2
5
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
e
r
a
h
s
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
m
$
S
U
7
8
5
,
5
p
u
d
e
l
l
a
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
t
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
5
0
0
2
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
t
a
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
n
o
i
t
i
s
n
a
r
t
s
S
R
F
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
n
a
l
p
e
r
a
h
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
e
r
e
h
t
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
s
t
s
o
c
f
o
t
e
n
,
d
e
b
i
r
c
s
b
u
s
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
e
r
a
h
s
w
e
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
r
o
f
t
i
f
o
r
P
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
w
O
n
i
y
t
i
u
q
e
n
i
y
l
t
c
e
r
i
d
d
e
s
i
n
g
o
c
e
r
s
e
g
n
a
h
c
f
o
e
r
a
h
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
r
u
t
n
e
v
t
n
i
o
j
r
o
s
e
t
a
i
c
o
s
s
a
f
o
y
t
i
u
q
e
e
h
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
n
a
l
p
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
d
e
n
i
f
e
d
n
o
)
s
e
s
s
o
l
(
/
s
n
i
a
g
l
a
i
r
a
u
t
c
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
e
c
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
e
g
n
a
h
c
x
E
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
s
e
s
s
o
l
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
F
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
h
t
o
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
d
r
a
w
a
e
r
a
h
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
g
n
a
r
r
a
t
n
e
m
y
a
p
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
t
s
o
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
v
o
m
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
y
t
i
u
q
e
m
o
r
f
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
r
o
o
t
y
l
t
c
e
r
i
d
n
e
k
a
t
s
m
e
t
i
n
o
x
a
T
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
T
,
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
n
o
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
y
t
i
r
o
n
i
m
n
i
e
s
a
e
r
c
n
i
t
e
N
f
o
g
n
i
t
s
e
v
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
e
s
p
a
l
d
n
a
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
s
t
n
u
o
m
a
d
n
a
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
f
o
u
e
i
l
n
i
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
S
443
–
–
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
i
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
d
n
a
s
l
a
s
o
p
s
i
d
s
t
s
u
r
t
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
n
i
h
t
i
w
s
e
i
r
a
i
c
i
f
e
n
e
b
r
o
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
y
c
i
l
o
p
f
o
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
e
h
t
r
o
f
s
d
n
u
f
t
n
e
m
e
r
i
t
e
r
,
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
b
e
c
n
a
r
u
s
n
i
s
’
C
B
S
H
n
i
h
t
i
w
d
l
e
h
s
e
r
a
h
s
n
w
o
f
o
)
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
7
5
,
2
$
S
U
(
2
2
1
,
1
4
0
,
4
4
1
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
h
t
i
w
m
r
o
f
n
o
c
o
t
d
e
t
a
t
s
e
r
n
e
e
b
e
v
a
h
s
r
e
b
m
u
n
5
0
0
2
.
s
t
e
k
r
a
M
l
a
b
o
l
G
n
i
s
e
i
t
i
v
i
t
c
a
g
n
i
k
a
m
-
t
e
k
r
a
m
e
h
t
d
n
a
,
s
n
a
l
p
s
u
n
o
b
r
o
s
e
m
e
h
c
s
e
r
a
h
s
e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e
r
e
d
n
u
d
e
r
e
v
i
l
e
d
e
b
o
t
d
e
t
c
e
p
x
e
s
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
t
e
s
e
h
t
r
o
f
.
5
0
0
2
s
t
n
u
o
c
c
A
d
n
a
t
r
o
p
e
R
l
a
u
n
n
A
e
h
t
n
i
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
S
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
F
e
h
t
n
o
6
4
e
t
o
N
e
e
s
,
5
0
0
2
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
t
a
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
n
o
i
t
i
s
n
a
r
t
s
S
R
F
I
e
h
t
f
o
n
o
i
t
a
n
a
l
p
x
e
n
a
r
o
F
.
r
a
e
y
e
h
t
g
n
i
r
u
d
d
e
r
r
u
c
n
i
s
t
s
o
c
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
i
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
0
4
$
S
U
f
o
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
e
d
e
h
t
s
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
e
r
a
h
S
.
n
o
i
t
a
t
n
e
s
e
r
p
s
’
r
a
e
y
t
n
e
r
r
u
c
e
h
t
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
8
6
7
,
2
1
$
S
U
d
n
a
e
c
n
a
r
F
C
B
S
H
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
0
9
2
,
8
$
S
U
f
o
e
c
n
e
r
e
f
f
i
d
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
f
e
h
t
s
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
s
’
C
B
S
H
n
I
.
y
l
n
o
e
u
l
a
v
l
a
n
i
m
o
n
r
i
e
h
t
t
a
d
e
d
r
o
c
e
r
e
r
e
w
d
e
u
s
s
i
s
e
r
a
h
s
e
h
t
d
n
a
3
0
0
2
n
i
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
e
c
n
a
n
i
F
C
B
S
H
d
n
a
0
0
0
2
n
i
e
c
n
a
r
F
C
B
S
H
,
2
9
9
1
n
i
c
l
p
k
n
a
B
C
B
S
H
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
n
e
k
a
t
s
a
w
5
8
9
1
t
c
A
s
e
i
n
a
p
m
o
C
e
h
t
f
o
1
3
1
n
o
i
t
c
e
S
r
e
d
n
u
f
e
i
l
e
r
m
u
i
m
e
r
p
e
r
a
h
s
y
r
o
t
u
t
a
t
S
.
’
e
m
o
c
n
i
g
n
i
d
a
r
t
t
e
N
‘
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
5
$
S
U
d
n
a
’
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
t
e
N
‘
o
t
n
e
k
a
t
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
1
0
1
$
S
U
e
d
u
l
c
n
i
s
e
g
d
e
h
w
o
l
f
h
s
a
c
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
h
t
o
t
d
e
r
r
e
f
s
n
a
r
t
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
.
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
m
a
s
i
n
o
i
t
a
r
o
p
r
o
C
e
c
n
a
n
i
F
C
B
S
H
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
1
2
3
4
5
e
h
t
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
6
4
,
3
$
S
U
g
n
i
d
u
l
c
n
i
,
8
9
9
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
1
o
t
r
o
i
r
p
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
s
f
o
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
f
o
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
n
i
s
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
e
e
b
s
a
h
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
8
3
1
,
5
$
S
U
o
t
g
n
i
t
n
u
o
m
a
l
l
i
w
d
o
o
g
e
v
i
t
a
l
u
m
u
C
.
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
r
t
s
n
i
a
g
a
d
e
g
r
a
h
c
n
e
e
b
s
a
h
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
9
6
6
,
1
$
S
U
f
o
e
c
n
a
l
a
b
e
h
T
.
c
l
p
k
n
a
B
C
B
S
H
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
e
h
t
n
o
g
n
i
s
i
r
a
e
v
r
e
s
e
r
r
e
g
r
e
m
–
–
–
–
2
3
4
,
2
9
8
5
0
,
1
2
5
3
5
,
1
)
4
8
2
(
4
0
1
,
1
3
2
2
,
6
5
6
9
8
,
6
7
6
6
,
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
1
3
t
A
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 40 and 41
40 Notes on the cash flow statement
Non-cash items included in profit before tax
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment ...............
Gains arising from dilution of interests in associates..
Revaluations on investment property .........................
Share-based payment expense ....................................
Loan impairment losses gross of recoveries ...............
Provisions for liabilities and charges ..........................
Impairment of financial investments ..........................
Charge for defined benefit plans ................................
Accretion of discounts and amortisation of
premiums .................................................................
Change in operating assets
Change in loans to HSBC undertakings .....................
Change in prepayments and accrued income .............
Change in net trading securities and net derivatives ..
Change in loans and advances to banks .....................
Change in loans and advances to customers ..............
Change in financial assets designated at fair value ....
Change in other assets ................................................
Change in operating liabilities
Change in accruals and deferred income ....................
Change in deposits by banks ......................................
Change in customer accounts .....................................
Change in debt securities in issue ...............................
Change in financial liabilities designated at fair value
Change in other liabilities ...........................................
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash at bank with HSBC undertakings ......................
Cash and balances at central banks ............................
Items in the course of collection from other banks ....
Loans and advances to banks of one month or less ...
Treasury bills, other bills and certificates of deposit
2007
US$m
2,522
(1,092)
(152)
870
18,182
989
65
727
(449)
21,662
HSBC
2006
US$m
HSBC Holdings
2005
US$m
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
2,528
–
(164)
854
11,331
498
21
664
(776)
14,956
2,213
–
(201)
540
8,295
327
–
676
(446)
11,404
(25)
–
–
29
–
–
–
–
6
10
–
–
–
58
–
–
–
–
–
58
2007
US$m
–
(5,069)
(4,972)
(8,922)
(131,886)
(13,360)
(12,329)
HSBC
2006
US$m
–
(2,478)
(13,620)
(11,505)
(132,987)
(4,883)
(9,844)
(176,538)
(175,317)
HSBC Holdings
2005
US$m
2007
US$m
–
7,121
4,940
307
(80,150)
(15,048)
(8,923)
(91,753)
(2,786)
(183)
(1,094)
–
–
–
4
(4,059)
2006
US$m
(1,060)
(22)
(740)
–
–
–
(5)
(1,827)
2007
US$m
5,119
32,594
199,806
(12,489)
12,304
12,761
250,095
2007
US$m
–
21,765
9,777
232,320
HSBC
2006
US$m
3,549
28,378
149,849
42,253
8,382
4,967
237,378
HSBC
2006
US$m
–
12,732
14,144
162,998
HSBC Holdings
2005
US$m
2007
US$m
(3,810)
(14,328)
46,394
(19,047)
61,837
1,166
72,212
39
–
–
–
148
(8)
179
2006
US$m
16
–
–
–
700
340
1,056
HSBC Holdings
2005
US$m
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
–
13,712
11,300
100,527
360
–
–
–
–
–
360
729
–
–
–
–
–
729
less than three months ............................................
41,819
38,237
22,790
Less: items in the course of transmission to
other banks ..............................................................
(8,672)
(12,625)
(7,022)
Total cash and cash equivalents .................................
297,009
215,486
141,307
444
Interest and dividends
Interest paid .................................................................
Interest received ..........................................................
Dividends received .....................................................
2007
US$m
(63,626)
103,393
1,833
HSBC
2006
US$m
(47,794)
85,143
1,525
HSBC Holdings
2005
US$m
(33,974)
65,799
808
2007
US$m
(2,397)
1,627
9,187
2006
US$m
(1,870)
1,287
7,433
41 Contingent liabilities, contractual commitments and guarantees
Contingent liabilities and guarantees
Guarantees and irrevocable letters of credit
pledged as collateral security ...............................
Other contingent liabilities .......................................
HSBC
2007
US$m
77,885
334
78,219
Commitments
Documentary credits and short-term trade-related
transactions ...........................................................
13,510
Forward asset purchases and forward forward
deposits placed .....................................................
Undrawn note issuing and revolving
underwriting facilities ..........................................
Undrawn formal standby facilities, credit lines
and other commitments to lend:
– 1 year and under1 ..............................................
– over 1 year1 ......................................................
1 Based on original maturity.
490
109
616,167
134,181
764,457
2006
US$m
77,410
330
77,740
9,659
2,077
213
584,167
118,514
714,630
HSBC Holdings
2007
US$m
2006
US$m
38,457
–
38,457
–
–
–
2,913
725
3,638
17,605
–
17,605
–
–
–
2,920
1,047
3,967
The above table discloses the nominal principal amounts of contingent liabilities, commitments and guarantees. They
are mainly credit-related instruments which include both financial and non-financial guarantees and commitments to
extend credit. Nominal principal amounts represent the amounts at risk should contracts be fully drawn upon and
clients default. The amount of the loan commitments shown above reflects, where relevant, the expected level of
take-up of pre-approved loan offers made by mailshots to personal customers. Since a significant portion of
guarantees and commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total of the nominal principal
amounts is not representative of future liquidity requirements.
Guarantees
HSBC provides guarantees and similar undertakings on behalf of both third party customers and other entities within
the HSBC Group. These guarantees are generally provided in the normal course of HSBC’s banking business. The
principal types of guarantees provided, and the maximum potential amount of future payments which HSBC could be
required to make at 31 December 2007, were as follows:
445
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 41 and 42
At 31 December 2007
At 31 December 2006
Guarantees
by HSBC
Holdings
in favour of
other HSBC
Group entities
US$m
Guarantees
by HSBC
Holdings
in favour of
other HSBC
Group entities
US$m
Guarantees
in favour of
third parties
US$m
38,457
22,746
17,605
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
38,457
4,535
5,514
8,070
592
7,301
28,627
25
77,410
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
17,605
Guarantees in
favour of
third parties
US$m
25,086
8,357
4,938
12,969
1,119
8,235
16,940
241
77,885
Guarantee type
Financial guarantee contracts1 ......................................
Standby letters of credit which are financial
guarantee contracts2 ..................................................
Other direct credit substitutes3 ......................................
Performance bonds4 ......................................................
Bid bonds4 .....................................................................
Standby letters of credit related to particular
transactions4 ..............................................................
Other transaction-related guarantees4 ...........................
Other items ....................................................................
1 Financial guarantees are contracts that require the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder for a loss incurred
because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in accordance with the original or modified terms of a debt instrument. The
amounts in the above table are nominal principal amounts.
2 Standby letters of credit which are financial guarantee contracts are irrevocable obligations on the part of HSBC to pay third parties
when customers fail to make payments when due.
3 Other direct credit substitutes include re-insurance letters of credit and trade-related letters of credit issued without provision for the
issuing entity to retain title to the underlying shipment.
4 Performance bonds, bid bonds, standby letters of credit and other transaction-related guarantees are undertakings by which the
obligation on HSBC to make payment depends on the outcome of a future event.
The amounts disclosed in the above table reflect HSBC’s maximum exposure under a large number of individual
guarantee undertakings. The risks and exposures arising from guarantees are captured and managed in accordance
with HSBC’s overall credit risk management policies and procedures. Approximately half of the above guarantees
have a term of less than one year. Guarantees with terms of more than one year are subject to HSBC’s annual credit
review process.
Commitments
At 31 December 2007, HSBC had US$942 million (2006: US$1,259 million) of capital commitments contracted
but not provided for and US$194 million (2006: US$289 million) of capital commitments authorised but not
contracted for.
In addition, the following agreements have been entered into to acquire businesses that are expected to be effected
after the date these financial statements are authorised for issue, subject to regulatory approval.
Agreement to acquire Korea Exchange Bank
In September 2007, HSBC agreed to acquire 51.02 per cent of the issued share capital of Korea Exchange Bank
(‘KEB’) from LSF-KEB Holdings SCA, a holding company owned by Lone Star Fund IV (US) LP and Lone Star
Fund IV (Bermuda) LP (collectively ‘Lone Star’). The consideration is KRW3,400 billion plus US$2,833 million,
amounting in total to the equivalent of approximately US$6,450 million, payable in cash.
Under a shareholders’ agreement with Lone Star, The Export-Import Bank of Korea (‘KEXIM’) is entitled to require
HSBC to purchase, on substantially the same terms, part or all of its shareholding in KEB (KEXIM’s entire
shareholding represents a further 6.25 per cent of the issued share capital of KEB).
The acquisition is subject to a number of conditions including the receipt of applicable governmental and regulatory
approvals, particularly in South Korea from the Financial Supervisory Commission and the Fair Trade Commission.
The acquisition agreement is conditional on completion taking place on or before 30 April 2008.
Following completion, KEB will be accounted for as a subsidiary in HSBC’s consolidated financial statements.
446
Acquisition of The Chinese Bank Co., Ltd.
In December 2007, HSBC was named the successful bidder in a government auction to acquire the business of The
Chinese Bank Co., Ltd. (‘The Chinese Bank’) in Taiwan.
The agreement relating to this acquisition will result in HSBC assuming The Chinese Bank’s assets, liabilities and
operations with a payment by the Taiwan Government’s Central Deposit Insurance Corporation to deliver an
agreed net asset position. In addition, HSBC will provide certain additional capital of between US$300 million
to US$400 million to ensure that its enlarged operations maintain appropriate financial ratios.
The transaction is subject to obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals.
Associates
HSBC’s share of associates’ contingent liabilities amounted to US$18,437 million at 31 December 2007 (2006:
US$13,824 million). No matters arose where HSBC was severally liable.
42 Lease commitments
Finance lease commitments
HSBC leases land and buildings (including branches) and equipment from third parties under finance lease
arrangements to support its operations.
Total future minimum payments:
– no later than one year ................................................................................................................
– later than one year and no later than five years ........................................................................
– later than five years ...................................................................................................................
Less: future interest charges ..............................................................................................................
Present value of finance lease commitments .....................................................................................
2007
US$m
39
128
835
1,002
(299)
703
2006
US$m
60
145
707
912
(205)
707
At 31 December 2007, future minimum sublease payments of US$465 million (2006: US$163 million) are expected
to be received under non-cancellable subleases at the balance sheet date.
Operating lease commitments
At 31 December 2007, HSBC was obligated under a number of non-cancellable operating leases for properties, plant
and equipment on which the future minimum lease payments extend over a number of years.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable
operating leases:
– no later than one year ...........................................
– later than one year and no later than five years ...
– later than five years ..............................................
2007
Land and
buildings
US$m
Equipment
US$m
2006
Land and
buildings
US$m
Equipment
US$m
788
2,010
1,736
4,534
11
14
–
25
789
2,290
1,198
4,277
10
21
–
31
In 2007, US$849 million (2006: US$781 million; 2005: US$704 million) was charged to ‘General and administrative
expenses’ in respect of lease and sublease agreements, of which US$838 million (2006: US$762 million; 2005:
US$683 million) related to minimum lease payments, US$8 million (2006: US$19 million; 2005: US$21 million)
to contingent rents, and US$3 million (2006: nil; 2005: nil) to sublease payments.
The contingent rent represents escalation payments made to landlords for operating, tax and other escalation expenses.
Finance lease receivables
HSBC leases a variety of assets to third parties under finance leases, including transport assets (such as aircraft),
property and general plant and machinery. At the end of lease terms, assets may be sold to third parties or leased for
447
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 42, 43 and 44
further terms. Lessees may participate in any sales proceeds achieved. Lease rentals arising during the lease terms
will either be fixed in quantum or be varied to reflect changes in, for example, tax or interest rates. Rentals are
calculated to recover the cost of assets less their residual value, and earn finance income.
Lease receivables:
– no later than one year ......
– later than one year and
no later than five years ....
– later than five years .........
Total future
minimum
payments
US$m
2007
Unearned
finance
income
US$m
Present
value
US$m
Total future
minimum
payments
US$m
2006
Unearned
interest
income
US$m
Present
value
US$m
2,958
(528)
2,430
2,305
(460)
1,845
8,741
9,194
20,893
(1,500)
(2,789)
(4,817)
7,241
6,405
16,076
7,207
9,206
18,718
(1,400)
(2,944)
(4,804)
5,807
6,262
13,914
At 31 December 2007, unguaranteed residual values of US$224 million (2006: US$212 million) had been accrued,
and the accumulated allowance for uncollectible minimum lease payments receivable amounted to US$23 million
(2006: US$28 million).
During the year, a total of US$44 million (2006: US$59 million) was received as contingent rents and recognised in
the income statement.
Operating lease receivables
HSBC leases a variety of different assets to third parties under operating lease arrangements, including transport
assets (such as rolling stock), property and general plant and machinery.
Future minimum lease payments under
non-cancellable operating leases:
– no later than one year ...........................................
– later than one year and no later than five years ...
– later than five years ..............................................
43 Litigation
2007
Land and
buildings
US$m
Equipment
US$m
2006
Land and
buildings
US$m
Equipment
US$m
50
14
10
74
838
1,363
400
2,601
47
17
12
76
808
1,561
573
2,942
HSBC is party to legal actions in a number of jurisdictions including the UK, Hong Kong and the US, arising out of
its normal business operations. HSBC considers that none of the actions is material, and none is expected to result in
a significant adverse effect on the financial position of HSBC, either individually or in the aggregate. Management
believes that adequate provisions have been made in respect of such litigation. HSBC has not disclosed any
contingent liability associated with these legal actions because it is not practicable to do so, except as set out below.
On 27 July 2007, the UK Office of Fair Trading (‘OFT’) issued High Court legal proceedings against a number of
UK financial institutions, including HSBC Bank plc, to determine the legal status and enforceability of certain of the
charges applied to their personal customers in relation to unauthorised overdrafts (the ‘charges’). Certain preliminary
issues in these proceedings were heard in a trial in the Commercial Division of the High Court on 17 January 2008.
This trial concluded on 8 February 2008 and judgment, on the preliminary issues tested, is awaited.
The proceedings remain at a very early stage and may, if appeals on the preliminary issues (or, subsequently, on
substantive issues) are pursued, take a number of years to conclude. A wide range of outcomes is possible,
depending, initially, upon whether the Court finds that some, all, or none of the charges should be tested for fairness
and/or tested as common law penalties and, if it does find that some or all of the charges should be so tested, upon the
Court’s subsequent assessment of each charge across the period under review. Since July 2001, there have been a
variety of charges applied by HSBC Bank plc across different charging periods under the then current contractual
arrangements. HSBC Bank plc considers the charges to be and to have been valid and enforceable, and intends
strongly to defend its position.
448
If, contrary to HSBC Bank plc’s current assessment, the Court should ultimately (after appeals) reach a decision
adverse to HSBC Bank plc that results in liability for it, a large number of different outcomes is possible, each of
which would have a different financial impact. Based on the facts currently available to it, and a number of
assumptions, HSBC Bank plc estimates that the financial impact could be approximately US$600 million. To make
an estimate of the potential financial impact at this stage with any precision is extremely difficult, owing to (among
other things) the complexity of the issues, the number of permutations of possible outcomes, and the early stage of
the proceedings. In addition, the assumptions made by HSBC Bank plc may prove to be incorrect.
44 Related party transactions
The Group’s related parties include associates, joint ventures, post-employment benefit plans for the benefit of HSBC
employees, Key Management Personnel, close family members of Key Management Personnel and entities which are
controlled, jointly controlled or significantly influenced, or for which significant voting power is held, by Key
Management Personnel or their close family members.
Transactions with Directors and other Key Management Personnel
Key Management Personnel are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing
and controlling the activities of HSBC Holdings, being the members of the Board of Directors of HSBC Holdings
and Group Managing Directors.
Compensation of Directors and other Key Management Personnel
Short-term employee benefits ............................................................................................................
Post-employment benefits .................................................................................................................
Termination benefits ..........................................................................................................................
Share-based payments .......................................................................................................................
HSBC
2007
US$m
62
4
9
40
115
2006
US$m
76
3
–
61
140
Transactions, arrangements and agreements involving Directors and others
Particulars of transactions, arrangements and agreements entered into by subsidiaries of HSBC Holdings with
Directors and connected persons and companies controlled by them and with officers of HSBC Holdings, disclosed
pursuant to section 232 of the Companies Act 1985, were as follows:
Directors and connected persons and companies
controlled by them ..................................................
Loans .............................................................................
Credit cards ...................................................................
Guarantees ....................................................................
Officers1 .......................................................................
Loans .............................................................................
Credit cards ...................................................................
Guarantees ....................................................................
2007
2006
Number of
persons
Balance at
31 December
US$000
Number of
persons
Balance at
31 December
US$000
94
12
534,227
300
27,044
19,041
206
25
85
12
407,176
317
21,751
16,706
687
23
1 Officers comprised 10 Group Managing Directors, the Group Chief Accounting Officer and the Group Company Secretary in 2007 and
2006.
Further information on related party transactions, disclosed pursuant to the requirements of IAS 24, is shown below.
The disclosure of the year-end balance and the highest amounts outstanding during the year in the table below is
considered to be the most meaningful information to represent the amount of the transactions and the amount of
outstanding balances during the year.
449
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Note 44
2007
2006
Balance at
31 December
US$000
Highest
amounts
outstanding
during year
US$000
Balance at
31 December
US$000
Key Management Personnel
Loans .............................................................................
Credit cards ...................................................................
Guarantees ....................................................................
325,648
323
27,044
804,845
1,077
30,317
423,594
976
21,774
Highest
amounts
outstanding
during year
US$000
582,606
1,637
24,952
Key Management Personnel of HSBC Holdings for the purposes of IAS 24 comprise all of the Directors of HSBC
Holdings, Group Managing Directors, and close members of their families and companies they control, jointly
control, or significantly influence, or for which significant voting power is held.
Some of the transactions were connected transactions, as defined by the Rules Governing The Listing of Securities on
The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited but were exempt from any disclosure requirements under the provisions
of those Rules.
The above transactions were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms, including
interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with persons of a similar standing or, where applicable,
with other employees. The transactions did not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other
unfavourable features.
Shareholdings and options of Directors and other Key Management Personnel
Number of options over HSBC Holdings ordinary shares made under employee share plans
held by Directors and other Key Management Personnel ............................................................
Number of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares held beneficially and non-beneficially by
Directors and other Key Management Personnel .........................................................................
Number of HSBC Holdings preference shares held beneficially and non-beneficially by
Directors and other Key Management Personnel .........................................................................
At 31 December
2007
(000’s)
2006
(000’s)
36
12,358
8
12,402
4,563
20,904
8
25,475
Transactions with other related parties of HSBC
Associates and joint ventures
The Group provides certain banking and financial services to associates and joint ventures. Details of the interests in
associates and joint ventures are given in Note 21. Transactions and balances during the year with associates and joint
ventures were as follows:
Amounts due from joint ventures:
– unsubordinated ......................................................
Amounts due from associates:
– subordinated ..........................................................
– unsubordinated ......................................................
Amounts due to joint ventures ......................................
Amounts due to associates ............................................
2007
2006
Highest
balance during
the year1
US$m
Balance at
31 December1
US$m
Highest
balance during
the year1
US$m
Balance at
31 December1
US$m
632
15
7,310
7,957
71
5,243
5,314
603
15
823
1,441
27
327
354
746
52
586
1,384
1,490
892
2,382
80
15
376
471
58
506
564
1 The disclosure of the year-end balance and the highest balance during the year is considered the most meaningful information to
represent transactions during the year.
450
The above outstanding balances arose from the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with third party counterparties.
Pension funds
At 31 December 2007, US$4.1 billion (2006: US$15.1 billion) of HSBC pension fund assets were under management
by HSBC companies. Fees of US$42 million (2006: US$49 million) were earned by HSBC companies for these
management services. HSBC’s pension funds had placed deposits of US$506 million (2006: US$348 million) with its
banking subsidiaries, on which interest payable to the schemes amounted to US$40 million (2006: US$15 million).
The above outstanding balances arose from the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with third party counterparties.
HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme entered into swap transactions with HSBC to manage the inflation and interest
rate sensitivity of the liabilities. At 31 December 2007, the gross notional value of the swaps was US$21.2 billion
(2006: US$14.5 billion), the swaps had a positive fair value of US$248 million (2006: negative fair value of
US$273 million) to the scheme and HSBC had delivered collateral of US$759 million (2006: US$265 million) to
the scheme in respect of these swaps. All swaps were executed at prevailing market rates and within standard market
bid offer spreads.
In order to satisfy diversification requirements, the Trustee has requested special collateral provisions for the swap
transactions between HSBC and the scheme. The collateral agreement stipulates that the scheme never posts
collateral to HSBC. Collateral is posted to the scheme by HSBC at an amount that the Trustee is highly confident
would be sufficient to replace the swaps in the event of default by HSBC Bank plc. With the exception of the special
collateral arrangements detailed above, all other aspects of the swap transactions between HSBC and the scheme are
on substantially the same terms as comparable transactions with third party counterparties.
HSBC International Staff Retirements Benefits Scheme entered into swap transactions with HSBC to manage the
inflation and interest rate sensitivity of the liabilities and selected assets. At 31 December 2007, the gross notional
value of the swaps was US$1.7 billion (2006: US$1.2 billion), and the swaps had a net positive fair value of
US$63 million to the scheme (2006: US$14 million).
HSBC Holdings
Details of HSBC Holdings’ principal subsidiaries are shown in Note 24. Transactions and balances during the year
with subsidiaries were as follows:
Subsidiaries
Assets
Cash at bank ..................................................................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Loans and advances ......................................................
Financial investments ...................................................
Investments in subsidiaries2 ..........................................
Total related party assets ..............................................
Liabilities
Amounts owed to HSBC undertakings ........................
Derivatives ....................................................................
Subordinated liabilities:
– cost .........................................................................
– fair value ................................................................
Total related party liabilities .........................................
Guarantees ....................................................................
2007
2006
Highest
balance during
the year1
US$m
Balance at
31 December1
US$m
Highest
balance during
the year1
US$m
Balance at
31 December1
US$m
729
2,660
17,242
3,389
69,411
93,431
3,191
290
4,109
4,231
11,821
38,457
360
2,660
17,242
2,676
69,411
92,349
2,969
44
4,109
4,187
11,309
38,457
784
1,599
14,935
3,426
63,265
84,009
4,279
385
3,991
4,231
12,886
36,877
729
1,599
14,456
3,316
63,265
83,365
3,100
177
3,991
4,231
11,499
17,605
1 The disclosure of the year-end balance and the highest balance during the year is considered the most meaningful information to
represent transactions during the year.
2 On 1 January 2007, HSBC Holdings adopted IFRIC 11. Comparative information has been restated accordingly. See Note 1a.
451
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
Notes 45 and 46 / Shareholder information
The above outstanding balances arose in the ordinary course of business and are on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and security, as for comparable transactions with third party counterparties, with the exception
of US$654 million (2006: US$640 million) in respect of loans from HSBC subsidiaries to HSBC Holdings made at
an agreed zero per cent interest rate.
Some employees of HSBC Holdings are members of the HSBC Bank (UK) Pension Scheme, which is sponsored by a
separate Group company. HSBC Holdings incurs a charge for these employees equal to the contributions paid into
the scheme on their behalf. Disclosure in relation to the scheme is made in Note 8 to the accounts.
45 Events after the balance sheet date
On 29 February 2008, HSBC France, a wholly owned subsidiary of HSBC, received a firm cash offer from Banque
Fédérale des Banques Populaires of €2.1 billion (US$3.1 billion) for its seven French regional banking subsidiaries.
On the basis of this offer, HSBC France has entered into exclusive discussions with Banque Fédérale des Banques
Populaires. HSBC France will now commence consultations with representatives of the relevant employee
representative bodies before making any final decision. Any transaction will be subject to regulatory approvals in
France. At 31 December 2007, the aggregate total assets attributable to the seven French regional banking
subsidiaries were €8.4 billion (US$12.3 billion), and they generated net profits after tax of €100 million
(US$137 million) for the year ended 31 December 2007.
A fourth interim dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per ordinary share (US$4,628 million) (2006: US$0.36 per ordinary
share, US$4,171 million) was declared by the Directors after 31 December 2007.
These accounts were approved by the Board of Directors on 3 March 2008 and authorised for issue.
46 UK and Hong Kong accounting requirements
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs. There would be no significant differences
had they been prepared in accordance with Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards.
452
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Shareholder Information
Enforceability of judgements / Exchange controls / Dividends
Information about the enforceability of
judgements made in the US .......................
453
Page
Exchange controls and other limitations
affecting equity security holders ................
Fourth interim dividend for 2007 ..................
Interim dividends for 2008 ............................
Dividends on the ordinary shares of HSBC
Holdings ....................................................
Nature of trading market ...............................
Shareholder profile ........................................
Memorandum and Articles of Association ....
Interim results ...............................................
Annual General Meeting ...............................
Shareholder enquiries and communications ..
Investor relations ...........................................
Where more information about HSBC is
available .....................................................
Taxation of shares and dividends ..................
History and development of HSBC ...............
Organisational structure ................................
453
453
454
454
454
456
456
456
456
457
458
458
458
461
463
Information about the enforceability
of judgements made in the US
HSBC Holdings is a public limited company
incorporated in England and Wales. Most of HSBC
Holdings’ Directors and executive officers live
outside the US. As a result, it may not be possible to
serve process on such persons or HSBC Holdings in
the US or to enforce judgements obtained in US
Fourth interim dividend for 2007
courts against them or HSBC Holdings based on
civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the
US. There is doubt as to whether English courts
would enforce:
•
•
certain civil liabilities under US securities laws
in original actions; or
judgements of US courts based upon these civil
liability provisions.
In addition, awards of punitive damages in
actions brought in the US or elsewhere may be
unenforceable in the UK. The enforceability of any
judgement in the UK will depend on the particular
facts of the case as well as the laws and treaties in
effect at the time.
Exchange controls and other
limitations affecting equity security
holders
There are currently no UK laws, decrees or
regulations which would prevent the import or
export of capital or remittance of distributable profits
by way of dividends and other payments to holders
of HSBC Holdings’ equity securities who are not
residents of the UK. There are also no restrictions
under the laws of the UK or the terms of the
Memorandum and Articles of Association of HSBC
Holdings concerning the right of non-resident or
foreign owners to hold HSBC Holdings’ equity
securities or, when entitled to vote, to do so.
The Directors have declared a fourth interim dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per ordinary share. Information on the
scrip dividend scheme and currencies in which shareholders may elect to have the cash dividend paid will be sent to
shareholders on or about 3 April 2008. The timetable for the dividend is:
Shares quoted ex-dividend in London, Hong Kong and Bermuda ........................................................................................
ADSs quoted ex-dividend in New York ...............................................................................................................................
Record date and closure of Hong Kong and Bermuda Overseas Branch Registers of shareholders for one day ................
Shares quoted ex-dividend in Paris .......................................................................................................................................
Mailing of Annual Report and Accounts 2007 and/or Annual Review 2007, Notice of Annual General Meeting and
2008
19 March
20 March
25 March
26 March
dividend documentation ....................................................................................................................................................
3 April
Final date for receipt by registrars of forms of election, Investor Centre electronic instructions and revocations of
standing instructions for scrip dividends ..........................................................................................................................
Exchange rate determined for payment of dividends in sterling and Hong Kong dollars ...................................................
Payment date: dividend warrants, new share certificates or transaction advices and notional tax vouchers mailed and
24 April
28 April
shares credited to stock accounts in CREST ....................................................................................................................
7 May
453
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Shareholder Information (continued)
Dividends / Nature of trading market
Interim dividends for 2008
The Board has adopted a policy of paying quarterly interim dividends on the ordinary shares. Under this policy it is
intended to have a pattern of three equal interim dividends with a variable fourth interim dividend. It is envisaged that
the first interim dividend in respect of 2008 will be US$0.18 per ordinary share. The proposed timetables for the
dividends in respect of 2008 are:
Announcement ..........................................................
ADSs quoted ex-dividend in New York ...................
Shares quoted ex-dividend in London,
Interim dividends for 2008
First
Second
Third
Fourth
6 May 2008
21 May 2008
4 August 2008 3 November 2008
20 August 2008 19 November 2008
2 March 2009
18 March 2009
Hong Kong and Bermuda .....................................
21 May 2008
20 August 2008 19 November 2008
18 March 2009
Record date and closure of Hong Kong Overseas
Branch Register of shareholders for one day .......
Shares quoted ex-dividend in Paris ..........................
Payment date .............................................................
23 May 2008
26 May 2008
9 July 2008
22 August 2008 21 November 2008
25 August 2008 24 November 2008
14 January 2009
8 October 2008
20 March 2009
23 March 2009
6 May 2009
Dividends on the ordinary shares of HSBC Holdings
HSBC Holdings has paid dividends on its ordinary shares every year without interruption since it became the HSBC
Group holding company by a scheme of arrangement in 1991. The dividends declared, per ordinary share, for each of
the last five years were:
First
interim
Second
interim
Third
interim
Fourth
interim1
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
US$ .......................................
£ ............................................
HK$ ......................................
US$ .......................................
£ ............................................
HK$ .......................................
US$ .......................................
£ ............................................
HK$ .......................................
US$ .......................................
£ ............................................
HK$ .......................................
US$ .......................................
£ ............................................
HK$ .......................................
0.170
0.085
1.328
0.150
0.082
1.164
0.140
0.077
1.088
0.130
0.071
1.013
0.240
0.146
1.860
0.170
0.084
1.322
0.150
0.079
1.167
0.140
0.079
1.086
0.130
0.072
1.014
0.120
0.065
0.931
0.170
0.086
1.325
0.150
0.078
1.168
0.140
0.079
1.085
0.130
0.069
1.013
0.240
0.135
1.871
0.390
0.194
3.041
0.360
0.183
2.799
0.310
0.169
2.403
0.270
0.141
2.104
–
–
–
Total2
0.900
0.449
7.016
0.810
0.422
6.298
0.730
0.404
5.662
0.660
0.353
5.144
0.600
0.346
4.662
1 The fourth interim dividend for 2007 of US$0.39 per share has been translated into pounds sterling and Hong Kong dollars at the
closing rate on 31 December 2007. The dividend will be paid on 7 May 2008.
2 The above dividends declared are accounted for as disclosed in Note 12 on the Financial Statements.
Dividends are declared in US dollars and, at the election of the shareholder, paid in cash in one of, or in a
combination of, US dollars, sterling and Hong Kong dollars, or, subject to the Board’s determination, may be
satisfied in whole or in part by the issue of new shares in lieu of a cash dividend.
Nature of trading market
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares are listed or admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange, the Hong Kong
Stock Exchange (‘HKSE’), Euronext Paris, the New York Stock Exchange (‘NYSE’) and the Bermuda Stock
Exchange. HSBC Holdings maintains its principal share register in England and overseas branch share registers in
Hong Kong and Bermuda (collectively, the ‘share register’).
As at 31 December 2007, there were a total of 210,931 holders of record of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares.
As at 31 December 2007, a total of 13,145,585 of the HSBC Holdings ordinary shares were registered in the
HSBC Holdings’ share register in the name of 12,018 holders of record with addresses in the US. These shares
represented 0.1111 per cent of the total HSBC Holdings ordinary shares in issue.
454
As at 31 December 2007, there were 10,490 holders of record of ADSs holding approximately 123 million
ADSs, representing approximately 614 million HSBC Holdings ordinary shares. 10,284 of these holders had
addresses in the US, holding approximately 122.7 million ADSs, representing 613.6 million HSBC Holdings
ordinary shares. As at 31 December 2007, approximately 5.2 per cent of the HSBC Holdings ordinary shares were
represented by ADSs held by holders of record with addresses in the US.
The following table shows, for the years, calendar quarters and months indicated, the highest and lowest prices
for the HSBC Holdings ordinary shares and ADSs. These are based on mid-market prices at close of business on the
London Stock Exchange, HKSE, Euronext Paris, NYSE and the Bermuda Stock Exchange.
Past share price performance should not be regarded as a guide to future performance.
High and low mid-market closing prices
London
US$0.50 shares
High
pence
Low
pence
Hong Kong
US$0.50 shares
New York
ADSs1
Low
HK$
High
US$
High
HK$
152.8
151.2
133.5
136.5
122.5
803
914
825
784
631
129.6
124.5
120.1
109.5
80.3
803
861
886
880
152.8
145.8
147.1
145.4
129.6
135.8
136.3
133.0
916
942
914
924
151.2
142.2
142.2
134.0
140.3
134.8
130.6
124.5
99.5
98.4
85.8
87.8
78.8
99.5
93.8
95.2
93.1
98.4
91.8
92.1
86.6
Paris
US$0.50 shares
High
euro
Low
euro
Bermuda2
US$0.50 shares
High
US$
Low
US$
14.4
15.4
13.9
13.6
13.4
13.9
13.7
14.0
14.4
15.4
14.5
14.4
14.6
11.2
13.3
12.0
11.8
9.3
11.2
12.8
13.2
12.8
13.6
13.7
13.3
13.4
19.6
19.6
17.1
17.3
–
19.6
18.8
18.7
18.8
19.6
18.4
18.1
17.4
16.5
16.4
15.7
14.5
–
16.5
17.1
17.7
17.2
18.1
17.3
16.7
16.4
Low
US$
82.5
80.5
77.5
70.0
51.1
82.5
87.2
88.0
85.8
90.2
86.6
84.2
80.5
676
131.9
104.0
83.8
70.4
11.5
9.1
17.0
14.1
806
803
905
870
861
870
136.7
152.0
152.8
143.4
144.7
145.8
130.8
129.6
142.2
137.7
135.8
141.1
87.5
95.5
99.5
93.0
93.3
93.8
82.7
82.5
92.6
88.8
87.2
89.0
11.9
13.3
13.9
13.4
13.6
13.7
11.2
11.2
13.0
12.8
12.9
13.1
17.3
19.3
19.6
18.4
18.4
18.8
16.5
16.5
18.3
17.6
17.1
18.2
2007 .......................
2006 .......................
2005 .......................
2004 .......................
2003 ….. .................
2007
4th Quarter ..............
3rd Quarter ..............
2nd Quarter ..............
1st Quarter ..............
2006
4th Quarter ..............
3rd Quarter ..............
2nd Quarter ..............
1st Quarter ..............
2008
January ...................
2007
December ...............
November ..............
October ..................
September ..............
August ....................
July .........................
964
1028
950
954
914
964
917
955
953
1028
975
985
995
850
858
925
964
914
917
916
1 In New York each ADS represents 5 underlying ordinary shares.
2 HSBC shares were not listed on the Bermuda Stock Exchange prior to 18 February 2004.
Stock symbols
HSBC Holdings ordinary shares trade under the following stock symbols:
London Stock Exchange
Hong Kong Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange (ADS)
Euronext Paris
Bermuda Stock Exchange
HSBA
5
HBC
HSB
HSBC
455
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Shareholder Information (continued)
Profile / Memorandum and Articles / Interim results / AGM / Enquiries and communications
Shareholder profile
At 31 December 2007 the register of members recorded the following details:
Ordinary shares held
1-100 ..................................................................................................................................................
101-400 ..............................................................................................................................................
401-500 ..............................................................................................................................................
501-1,000 ...........................................................................................................................................
1,001-5,000 ........................................................................................................................................
5,001-10,000 ......................................................................................................................................
10,001-20,000 ....................................................................................................................................
20,001-50,000 ....................................................................................................................................
50,001-200,000 ..................................................................................................................................
200,001-500,000 ................................................................................................................................
500,001 and above .............................................................................................................................
Total
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Number of
shareholders
Total
shares held
32,395
35,392
9,839
32,830
67,037
15,520
8,591
5,185
2,578
654
910
1,034,423
9,004,801
4,456,230
24,675,887
154,854,553
109,692,980
119,360,643
159,148,214
239,796,284
206,507,616
10,800,520,686
210,931
11,829,052,317
The discussion under the caption ‘Memorandum and Articles of Association’ contained in HSBC Holdings’ Annual
Reports on Form 20-F for the years ended 31 December 2000 and 2001 is incorporated by reference herein.
Interim results
The interim results for the six months to 30 June 2008 will be announced on 4 August 2008.
Annual General Meeting
The 2008 Annual General Meeting will be held at the Barbican Hall, Barbican Centre, London EC2 on 30 May 2008
at 11 am.
All resolutions considered at the 2007 Annual General Meeting were passed on a poll as follows:
Resolution
1 To receive the Report and Accounts for 2006 ...........................................
2 To approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report for 2006 .......................
3 To re-elect the following as Directors:
(a) The Lord Butler ..................................................................................
(b) The Baroness Dunn ...........................................................................
(c) R A Fairhead ......................................................................................
(d) W K L Fung........................................................................................
(e) Sir Brian Moffat ................................................................................
(f) G Morgan ...........................................................................................
4 To reappoint the Auditor at remuneration to be determined by the
Group Audit Committee ........................................................................
5 To authorise the Directors to allot shares ..................................................
6 To disapply pre-emption rights (Special Resolution) ................................
7 To authorise the Company to purchase its own Ordinary Shares .............
8 To authorise the Directors to offer a scrip dividend alternative ................
9 To authorise the Company to make political donations and incur political
expenditure ............................................................................................
10 To authorise HSBC Bank plc to make political donations and incur
political expenditure ..............................................................................
11 To authorise electronic communications with shareholders in accordance
with the Companies Act 2006 ...............................................................
12 To alter the Articles of Association (Special Resolution) .........................
Total votes
For1
Against
Vote withheld2
3,864,479,235
3,689,326,342
3,821,854,383
3,811,429,682
3,868,782,235
3,816,457,837
3,816,081,722
3,834,697,821
3,839,835,491
3,849,690,002
3,846,012,397
3,870,162,901
3,870,471,683
8,919,383
97,555,034
54,773,594
65,186,829
9,708,695
59,990,498
60,292,153
42,204,988
10,313,830
26,121,717
26,934,800
10,921,090
6,786,564
9,697,178
96,172,523
6,390,274
6,411,316
4,535,972
6,580,256
6,650,750
6,079,276
32,872,395
7,134,352
10,064,563
1,871,381
5,753,519
3,753,329,722
88,666,544
41,001,817
3,752,489,533
89,386,605
41,095,387
3,872,910,676
3,868,543,551
5,680,069
7,036,072
4,378,887
7,398,915
1 Includes discretionary votes.
2 A ‘Vote withheld’ is not a ‘vote’ in law and is not counted in the calculation of the votes ‘For’ and ‘Against’ the resolution.
456
Shareholder enquiries and communications
Enquiries
Any enquiries relating to your shareholding, for example transfers of shares, change of name or address, lost share
certificates or dividend cheques, should be sent to the Registrars:
Principal Register
Hong Kong Overseas Branch Register:
Bermuda Overseas Branch Register:
Computershare Investor Services PLC
PO Box 1064, The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS99 3FA
UK
Telephone: 44 (0) 870 702 0137
Email: web.queries@computershare.co.uk
Computershare Hong Kong Investor
Services Limited
Hopewell Centre
Rooms 1806-1807
18th Floor
183 Queen’s Road East
Hong Kong
Telephone: 852 2862 8555
Email: hkinfo@computershare.com.hk
Corporate Shareholder Services
The Bank of Bermuda Limited
6 Front Street
Hamilton HM 11
Bermuda
Telephone: 1 441 299 6737
Email: david.b.davies@bob.hsbc.com
Any enquiries relating to ADSs should be sent to the depositary:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Investor Services
PO Box 11258
Church Street Station
New York, NY 10286-1258
USA
Telephone (US): 1 888 269 2377
Telephone (International): 1 201 680 6825
Email: shareowners@bankofny.com
Any enquiries relating to shares held through Euroclear France, the settlement and central depositary system for
Euronext Paris, should be sent to the paying agent:
HSBC France
103, avenue des Champs Elysées
75419 Paris Cedex 08
France
Telephone: 33 1 40 70 22 56
If you have been nominated to receive general shareholder communications directly from HSBC Holdings it is
important to remember that your main contact in terms of your investment remains as it was (so the registered
shareholder, or perhaps custodian or broker, who administers the investment on your behalf). Therefore any changes
or queries relating to your personal details and holding (including any administration thereof) must continue to be
directed to your existing contact at your investment manager or custodian. HSBC Holdings cannot guarantee dealing
with matters that are directed to us in error.
Further copies of this Annual Report and Accounts 2007 may be obtained by writing to the following departments:
For those in Europe, the Middle East and
Africa:
For those in Asia-Pacific:
For those in the Americas:
Group Communications
HSBC Holdings plc
8 Canada Square
London E14 5HQ
UK
Group Communications (Asia)
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited
1 Queen’s Road Central
Hong Kong
Internal Communications
HSBC-North America
26525 N Riverwoods Boulevard
Mettawa
Illinois 60045
USA
Electronic communications
Shareholders may at any time choose to receive corporate communications in printed form or to receive a notification
of its availability on HSBC’s website. To receive future notifications of the availability of a corporate communication
on HSBC’s website by email, or revoke or amend an instruction to receive such notifications by email, go to
www.hsbc.com/ecomms. If you received a notification of the availability of this document on HSBC’s website and
would like to receive a printed copy, or would like to receive future corporate communications in printed form,
please write to the appropriate Registrars at the address given above. Printed copies will be provided without charge.
457
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Shareholder Information (continued)
Investor relations / Where information is available / Taxation of shares and dividends
Chinese translation
A Chinese translation of this Annual Report and Accounts 2007 is available upon request after 3 April 2008 from the
Registrars:
Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited
Hopewell Centre, Rooms 1806-07, 18th Floor
183 Queen’s Road East
Hong Kong
Computershare Investor Services PLC
PO Box 1064, The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS99 3FA
UK
Please also contact the Registrars if you wish to receive Chinese translations of future documents or if you have
received a Chinese translation of this document and do not wish to receive such translations in future.
Investor relations
Enquiries relating to HSBC’s strategy or operations may be directed to:
Senior Manager Investor Relations
HSBC Holdings plc
8 Canada Square
London E14 5HQ
UK
Telephone: 44 (0)20 7991 8041
Facsimile: 44 (0)20 7991 4663
E-mail:
investorrelations@hsbc.com
Investor Relations Officer
HSBC North America Holdings Inc.
26525 N Riverwoods Boulevard
Mettawa, Illinois 60045
USA
1 224 544 4400
1 224 552 4400
investor.relations.usa@us.hsbc.com
Senior Manager External Relations
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation Limited
1 Queen’s Road Central
Hong Kong
852 2822 4929
852 2845 0113
investorrelations@hsbc.com.hk
Where more information about
HSBC is available
This Annual Report and Accounts 2007, and other
information on HSBC, may be viewed on HSBC’s
website: www.hsbc.com.
US Investors may read and copy the reports,
statements or information that HSBC Holdings files
with the Securities and Exchange Commission at its
public reference room in Washington, DC, which is
located at 100 F Street, Room 1580, Washington, DC
20549. These documents will also be available at the
Commission’s regional offices located at the
Woolworth Building, 233 Broadway, New York, NY
10279 and at Citicorp Center, 500 West Madison
Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60661. Investors
should call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the operation of the public
reference rooms. Investors can request copies of
these documents upon payment of a duplicating fee,
by writing to the Commission at 100 F Street, Mail
Stop 5100, Washington, DC 50549. The Commission
maintains an internet site (www.sec.gov) at which
investors may view reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the Commission,
including HSBC Holdings. Investors may also obtain
the reports and other information HSBC Holdings
files at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, NY 10005.
Taxation of shares and dividends
Taxation – UK residents
The following is a summary, under current law, of
the principal UK tax considerations that are likely
to be material to the ownership and disposition of
shares. The summary does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all the tax
considerations that may be relevant to a holder of
shares. In particular, the summary deals principally
with shareholders who are resident in the UK for
UK tax purposes and only with holders who hold
the shares as investments and who are the beneficial
owners of the shares, and does not address the tax
treatment of certain classes of holders such as
dealers in securities. Holders and prospective
purchasers should consult their own advisers
regarding the tax consequences of an investment
in shares in light of their particular circumstances,
including the effect of any national, state or local
laws.
458
Taxation of dividends
Currently no tax is withheld from dividends paid by
HSBC Holdings. However, dividends are paid with
an associated tax credit which is available for set-off
by certain shareholders against any liability they
may have to UK income tax. Currently, the
associated tax credit is equivalent to 10 per cent of
the combined cash dividend and tax credit, i.e.
one-ninth of the cash dividend.
For individual shareholders who are resident in
the UK for taxation purposes and liable to UK
income tax at the basic rate, no further UK income
tax liability arises on the receipt of a dividend from
HSBC Holdings. Individual shareholders who are
liable to UK income tax at the higher rate on UK
dividend income (currently 32.5 per cent) are taxed
on the combined amount of the dividend and the tax
credit. The tax credit is available for set-off against
the higher rate liability, leaving net higher rate tax to
pay equal to 25 per cent of the cash dividend.
Individual UK resident shareholders are not entitled
to any tax credit repayment.
Although non-UK resident shareholders are
generally not entitled to any repayment of the tax
credit in respect of any UK dividend received, some
such shareholders may be so entitled under the
provisions of a double taxation agreement between
their country of residence and the UK. However, in
most cases no amount of the tax credit is, in practice,
repayable.
Information on the taxation consequences of the
HSBC Holdings scrip dividends offered in lieu of the
2006 fourth interim dividend and the first, second
and third interim dividends for 2007 was set out in
the Secretary’s letters to shareholders of 3 April,
30 May, 29 August and 5 December 2007. In each
case, the difference between the cash dividend
foregone and the market value of the scrip dividend
did not equal or exceed 15 per cent of the market
value and accordingly, the price of HSBC Holdings
US$0.50 ordinary shares (the ‘shares’) for UK tax
purposes for the dividends was the cash dividend
foregone.
Taxation of capital gains
The computation of the capital gains tax liability
arising on disposals of shares in HSBC Holdings by
shareholders subject to UK capital gains tax can be
complex, partly depending on whether, for example,
the shares were purchased since April 1991, acquired
in 1991 in exchange for shares in The Hongkong and
Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, or acquired
subsequent to 1991 in exchange for shares in other
companies.
459
For capital gains tax purposes, the acquisition
cost for ordinary shares is adjusted to take account of
subsequent rights and capitalisation issues. Further
adjustments apply where an individual shareholder
has chosen to receive shares instead of cash
dividends, subject to scrip issues made since 6 April
1998 being treated for tax as separate holdings. Any
capital gain arising on a disposal may also be
adjusted to take account of indexation allowance
and, in the case of individuals, taper relief. Except
for gains made by a company chargeable to UK
corporation tax, any such indexation allowance is
calculated up to 5 April 1998 only.
Changes to capital gains tax have been
announced that will apply to disposals of shares with
effect from 6 April 2008. The proposals are expected
to be confirmed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer
in his budget due on 12 March 2008. The proposals
include:
•
•
shares will no longer be treated as separate
holdings but pooled, the consequence of which
is the tax basis of disposals will be calculated on
the average cost of the shares held;
indexation allowance is withdrawn;
• Taper Relief is withdrawn; and
•
a single tax rate of 18 per cent will apply to all
gains.
If in doubt, shareholders are recommended to
consult their professional advisers.
Inheritance tax
Shares or ADSs held by an individual whose
domicile is determined to be the US for the purposes
of the United States-United Kingdom Double
Taxation Convention relating to estate and gift taxes
(the ‘Estate Tax Treaty’) and who is not for such
purposes a national of the UK will not, provided any
US Federal estate or gift tax chargeable has been
paid, be subject to UK inheritance tax on the
individual’s death or on a lifetime transfer of shares
or ADSs except in certain cases where the shares or
ADSs (i) are comprised in a settlement (unless, at the
time of the settlement, the settlor was domiciled in
the US and was not a national of the UK), (ii) is part
of the business property of a UK permanent
establishment of an enterprise, or (iii) pertains to a
UK fixed base of an individual used for the
performance of independent personal services. In
such cases, the Estate Tax Treaty generally provides
a credit against US Federal tax liability for the
amount of any tax paid in the UK in a case where the
shares or ADSs are subject to both UK inheritance
tax and to US Federal estate or gift tax.
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Shareholder Information (continued)
Taxation of shares and dividends / History and development
Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax
Transfers of shares by a written instrument of
transfer generally will be subject to UK stamp duty
at the rate of 0.5 per cent of the consideration paid
for the transfer, and such stamp duty is generally
payable by the transferee.
An agreement to transfer shares, or any interest
therein, normally will give rise to a charge to stamp
duty reserve tax at the rate of 0.5 per cent of the
consideration. However, provided an instrument of
transfer of the shares is executed pursuant to the
agreement and duly stamped before the date on
which the stamp duty reserve tax becomes payable,
under the current practice of UK HM Revenue and
Customs it will not be necessary to pay the stamp
duty reserve tax, nor to apply for such tax to be
cancelled. Stamp duty reserve tax is generally
payable by the transferee.
Paperless transfers of shares within CREST, the
UK’s paperless share transfer system, are liable to
stamp duty reserve tax at the rate of 0.5 per cent of
the consideration. In CREST transactions, the tax is
calculated and payment made automatically.
Deposits of shares into CREST generally will not be
subject to stamp duty reserve tax, unless the transfer
into CREST is itself for consideration.
Taxation – US residents
The following is a summary, under current law, of
the principal UK tax and US federal income tax
considerations that are likely to be material to the
ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs by a
holder that is a resident of the US for the purposes of
the income tax convention between the US and the
UK (the ‘Treaty’), and is fully eligible for benefits
under the Treaty (an ‘eligible US holder’). The
summary does not purport to be a comprehensive
description of all of the tax considerations that may
be relevant to a holder of shares or ADSs. In
particular, the summary deals only with eligible US
holders that hold shares or ADSs as capital assets,
and does not address the tax treatment of holders that
are subject to special tax rules, such as banks, tax-
exempt entities, insurance companies, dealers in
securities or currencies, persons that hold shares or
ADSs as part of an integrated investment (including
a ‘straddle’) comprised of a share or ADS and one or
more other positions, and persons that own, directly
or indirectly, 10 per cent or more of the voting stock
of HSBC Holdings. This discussion is based on laws,
treaties, judicial decisions and regulatory
interpretations in effect on the date hereof, all of
which are subject to change. Under the current
income tax treaty between the UK and the US,
460
eligible US holders are no longer entitled to claim a
special foreign tax credit in respect of dividends.
Holders and prospective purchasers should
consult their own advisers regarding the tax
consequences of an investment in shares or ADSs in
light of their particular circumstances, including the
effect of any national, state or local laws.
In general, the beneficial owner of a share or
ADS will be entitled to benefits under the Treaty
(and, therefore, will be an eligible US holder) if it is
(i) an individual resident of the US, a US corporation
meeting ownership criteria specified in the Treaty or
other entity meeting criteria specified in the Treaty;
and (ii) not also resident in the UK for UK tax
purposes. Special rules, including a limitation of
benefits provision, may apply. The Treaty benefits
discussed below generally are not available to US
holders that hold shares or ADSs in connection with
the conduct of a business through a permanent
establishment, or the performance of personal
services through a fixed base, in the UK.
Taxation of dividends
An eligible US holder must include cash dividends
paid on the shares or ADSs in ordinary income on
the date that such holder or the ADS depositary
receives them, translating dividends paid in UK
pounds sterling into US dollars using the exchange
rate in effect on the date of receipt. Subject to certain
exceptions for positions that are held for less than 61
days or are hedged, and subject to a foreign
corporation being considered a ‘qualified foreign
corporation’ (which includes not being classified for
US federal income tax purposes as a passive foreign
investment company), certain dividends (‘qualified
dividends’) received by an individual eligible US
holder before 2009 generally will be subject to US
taxation at a maximum rate of 15 per cent. Based on
the company’s audited financial statements and
relevant market and shareholder data, HSBC
Holdings believes that it was not treated as a passive
foreign investment company for US federal income
tax purposes with respect to its 2005 or 2006 taxable
year. In addition, based on the company’s audited
financial statements and current expectations
regarding the value and nature of its assets, and the
sources and nature of its income, HSBC Holdings
does not anticipate being classified as a passive
foreign investment company for its 2007 taxable
year. Accordingly, dividends paid on the shares or
ADSs generally should be treated as qualified
dividends.
Taxation of capital gains
Gains realised by an eligible US holder on the sale or
other disposition of shares or ADSs normally will
not be subject to UK taxation unless at the time of
the sale or other disposition the holder carries on a
trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a
branch or agency or permanent establishment and
the shares or ADSs are or have been used, held or
acquired for the purposes of such trade, profession,
vocation, branch or agency or permanent
establishment. Such gains will be included in income
for US tax purposes, and will be long-term capital
gains if the shares or ADSs were held for more than
one year. A long-term capital gain realised by an
individual holder generally is subject to US tax at a
maximum rate of 15 per cent.
Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax –
ADSs
If shares are transferred into a clearance service or
depository receipt (‘ADR’) arrangement (which will
include a transfer of shares to the Depository) UK
stamp duty and/or stamp duty reserve tax will be
payable. The stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax is
generally payable on the consideration for the
transfer and is payable at the aggregate rate of
1.5 per cent.
The amount of stamp duty reserve tax payable
on such a transfer will be reduced by any stamp duty
paid in connection with the same transfer.
No stamp duty will be payable on the transfer
of, or agreement to transfer, an ADS, provided that
the ADR and any separate instrument of transfer or
written agreement to transfer remain at all times
outside the UK, and provided further that any such
transfer or written agreement to transfer is not
executed in the UK. No stamp duty reserve tax will
be payable on a transfer of, or agreement to transfer,
an ADS effected by the transfer of an ADR.
On a transfer of shares from the Depository to a
registered holder of an ADS upon cancellation of the
ADS, a fixed stamp duty of £5 per instrument of
transfer will be payable by the registered holder of
the ADR cancelled.
US backup withholding tax and information
reporting
Distributions made on shares and proceeds from the
sale of shares or ADSs that are paid within the US,
or through certain financial intermediaries to US
holders, are subject to information reporting and may
be subject to a US ‘backup’ withholding tax unless,
in general, the US holder complies with certain
461
certification procedures or is a corporation or other
person exempt from such withholding. Holders that
are not US persons generally are not subject to
information reporting or backup withholding tax, but
may be required to comply with applicable
certification procedures to establish that they are not
US persons in order to avoid the application of such
information reporting requirements or backup
withholding tax to payments received within the US
or through certain financial intermediaries.
History and development of HSBC
1865 The founding member of the HSBC Group,
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation, is established in both Hong
Kong and Shanghai.
1959 The Mercantile Bank of India Limited and
The British Bank of the Middle East, now
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited, are
purchased.
1965 A 51 per cent interest (subsequently increased
to 62.14 per cent) is acquired in Hang Seng
Bank Limited. Hang Seng Bank is the fourth-
largest listed bank in Hong Kong by market
capitalisation.
1980 A 51 per cent interest in Marine Midland
Banks, Inc., now HSBC USA, Inc, is acquired
(with the remaining interest acquired in
1987).
1981 The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation incorporates its then existing
Canadian operations. HSBC Bank Canada
subsequently makes numerous acquisitions,
expanding rapidly to become the largest
foreign-owned bank in Canada and the
seventh-largest overall at 31 December 2007.
1987 A 14.9 per cent interest in Midland Bank plc,
now HSBC Bank plc, one of the UK’s
principal clearing banks, is purchased.
1991 HSBC Holdings plc is established as the
parent company of the HSBC Group.
1992 HSBC purchases the remaining interest in
Midland Bank plc.
1993 As a consequence of the Midland acquisition,
HSBC’s Head Office is transferred from
Hong Kong to London in January.
1997 HSBC assumes selected assets, liabilities and
subsidiaries of Banco Bamerindus do Brasil
S.A., now HSBC Bank Brazil, following the
intervention of the Central Bank of Brazil,
and in Argentina completes the acquisition of
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Shareholder Information (continued)
History and development / Organisational Structure
Grupo Roberts, now part of HSBC Bank
Argentina S.A.
1999 HSBC acquires Republic New York
Corporation, subsequently merged with
HSBC USA, Inc., and Safra Republic
Holdings S.A.
2000 HSBC completes its acquisition of 99.99 per
cent of the issued share capital of Crédit
Commercial de France S.A., now HSBC
France.
2002 HSBC acquires 99.59 per cent of Grupo
Financiero Bital, S.A. de C.V., the holding
company of what is now HSBC Mexico.
2003 HSBC acquires Household International, Inc.,
now HSBC Finance Corporation. HSBC
Finance brings to the Group national
coverage in the US for consumer lending,
credit cards and credit insurance through
multiple distribution channels.
2003 HSBC acquires Banco Lloyds TSB S.A.-
Banco Múltiplo in Brazil and the country’s
leading consumer finance company, Losango
Promotora de Vendas Limitada.
2004 HSBC Bank USA, Inc. merges with HSBC
2006 HSBC acquires Grupo Banistmo S.A.
(‘Banistmo’), the leading banking group in
Central America, through a tender offer to
acquire 99.98 per cent of the outstanding
shares of Banistmo.
2007 During the first half of the year, HSBC’s three
associates in mainland China, Industrial
Bank, Ping An Insurance and Bank of
Communications, issue new shares. HSBC
does not subscribe and, as a result, its
interests in the associates’ equity decrease
from 15.98 per cent to 12.78 per cent, from
19.90 per cent to 16.78 per cent and from
19.90 per cent to 18.60 per cent, respectively.
A gain of US$1.1 billion accrues to HSBC
from the increase in the associates’
underlying net assets. Subsequently, in
September and October, HSBC increases its
holding in Bank of Communications from
18.60 per cent to 19.01 per cent for US$308
million.
2007
In September, HSBC agrees to acquire
51.02 per cent of the issued share capital of
Korea Exchange Bank for US$6.5 billion,
payable in cash, subject to a number of
conditions including regulatory approvals.
In December, HSBC is named the successful
bidder in a government auction to acquire the
assets, liabilities and operations of Chinese
Bank Co., Ltd in Taiwan, with a subsidy
equivalent to US$1.5 billion from Taiwan
Government’s Central Deposit Insurance
Corporation. HSBC agrees to provide
additional capital of between US$300 million
and US$400 million to ensure appropriate
financial ratios are maintained.
Bank & Trust (Delaware) N.A. to form HSBC
Bank USA, N.A.
2007
2004 The acquisition of The Bank of Bermuda
Limited is completed.
2004 HSBC acquires Marks and Spencer Retail
Financial Services Holdings Limited, which
trades as Marks and Spencer Money (‘M&S
Money’) in the UK.
2004 HSBC acquires 19.9 per cent of Bank of
Communications, mainland China’s fifth-
largest bank by total assets, and Hang Seng
Bank acquires 15.98 per cent of Industrial
Bank.
2005 HSBC increases its holding in Ping An
Insurance to 19.9 per cent, having made its
initial investment in 2002. Ping An Insurance
is the second-largest life insurer and the third-
largest property and casualty insurer in
mainland China.
2005 HSBC Finance completes the acquisition of
Metris Companies Inc., making HSBC the
fifth-largest issuer of MasterCard and Visa
cards in the USA.
462
Organisational Structure
463
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Glossary
Accounting terms used
US equivalent or brief description
Accounts
Articles of Association
Associates
Attributable profit
Balance sheet
Bills
Called up share capital
Capital allowances
Creditors
Debtors
Deferred tax
Depreciation
Finance lease
Freehold
Interests in associates and
joint ventures
Loans and advances
Loan capital
Nominal value
One-off
Ordinary shares
Overdraft
Preference shares
Premises
Provisions
Share capital
Shareholders’ equity
Share premium account
Shares in issue
Write-offs
Financial Statements
Bylaws
Long-term equity investments accounted for using the equity method
Net income
Statement of financial position
Notes
Ordinary shares, issued and fully paid
Tax depreciation allowances
Payables
Receivables
Deferred income tax
Amortisation
Capital lease
Ownership with absolute rights in perpetuity
Long-term equity investments accounted for using the equity method
Lendings
Long-term debt
Par value
Non-recurring
Common stock
A line of credit, contractually repayable on demand unless a fixed-term has been agreed,
established through a customer’s current account
Preferred stock
Real estate
Allowances
Ordinary shares or common stock issued and fully paid
Stockholders’ equity
Additional paid-in capital
Shares outstanding
Charge-offs
Abbreviations used
Brief description
ABCP
ADR
ADS
AIEA
ALCO
ARM
ASF
Asscher
ATM
AUM
Banca Nazionale
Bank of Bermuda
Bank of Communications
Basel Committee
Basel I
Basel II
BHCA
BIB
Asset-backed commercial paper
American Depositary Receipt
American depositary share
Average interest-earning assets
Asset and Liability Management Committee
Adjustable-rate mortgage
Asset and Structured Finance
Asscher Finance Ltd, a structured investment vehicle managed by HSBC
Automated teller machines
Assets under management
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SpA
The Bank of Bermuda Limited, which was acquired in February 2004
Bank of Communications Co., Limited, mainland China’s fifth largest bank in which
HSBC currently has 19.01 per cent interest
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
The 1988 Basel Capital Accord
The Final Accord of the Basel Committee on proposals for a new capital adequacy
framework
US Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
Business Internet Banking
464
Abbreviations used
Brief description
Bps
Brazilian operations
Basis points. One basis point is equal to one hundredth of a percentage point
HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.-Banco Múltiplo and subsidiaries, plus HSBC Serviços e
Participações Limitada
Cash flow hedge
Hedge of the variability in highly probable future cash flows attributable to a recognised
CC
CCF
CD
CDO
CGU
Chailease
CIS
CNAV
Combined Code
CP
CPI
Cullinan
Cyprus Popular Bank
Decision One
DPF
Enhanced VNAV
EPS
EU
Fair value hedge
FDIC
FFIEC
FHC
asset or liability, or a forecast transaction
Competition Commission
CCF S.A., the former name of HSBC France
Certificate of deposit
Collateralised debt obligation
Cash-generating unit
Chailease Credit Services Company Ltd, a receivables finance company acquired in
Taiwan by HSBC
Core Investment Solutions
Constant Net Asset Value
Combined Code on Corporate Governance issued by the Financial Reporting Council
Commercial paper
Consumer price index
Cullinan Finance Ltd, a structured investment vehicle managed by HSBC
The Cyprus Popular Bank Limited
Decision One Mortgage Company, HSBC Finance’s subsidiary which originates loans
referred by mortgage brokers
Discretionary participation feature of insurance and investment contracts
Enhanced Variable Net Asset Value
Earnings per share
European Union
Hedge of the change in fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or firm commitments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (US)
Federal Financial Institution Examination Council
Financial holding company, as defined under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act amendments
to the BHCA
FSA
FSMA
FTSE
GAAP
GCRO
GDP
Global Banking and Markets
Financial Services Authority (UK)
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK)
Financial Times – Stock Exchange index
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Group Chief Risk Officer
Gross domestic product
The global business of the Group (previously known as Corporate, Investment Banking
Global Markets
GMB
Group
GSC
Hang Seng Bank
HFC
HKMA
HKSE
Hong Kong
HNAH
HSBC
HSBC Assurances
and Markets) comprising Global Markets, Global Banking and Global Asset
Management
HSBC’s treasury and capital markets services in Global Banking and Markets
Group Management Board
HSBC Holdings together with its subsidiary undertakings
Group Service Centre
Hang Seng Bank Limited, the fourth largest bank in Hong Kong by market capitalisation
HFC Bank Limited, the UK-based consumer finance business acquired through the
acquisition by HSBC of HSBC Finance
Hong Kong Monetary Authority
The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China
HSBC North America Holdings Inc, the bank holding company formed on 1 January
2004 to hold all of HSBC’s North America operations
HSBC Holdings together with its subsidiary undertakings
HSBC Assurances, comprising Erisa S.A., the French life insurer, and Erisa I.A.R.D., the
property and casualty insurer (together, formerly Erisa)
465
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Glossary (continued)
Abbreviations used
Brief description
HSBC Bank
HSBC Bank Argentina
HSBC Bank Brazil
HSBC Bank plc, formerly Midland Bank plc
HSBC Bank Argentina S.A.
HSBC Bank Brasil S.A.-Banco Múltiplo, HSBC’s retail banking operation in Brazil,
formerly Banco Bamerindus do Brasil S.A.
HSBC Bank China
HSBC Bank (China) Company Limited, HSBC’s banking subsidiary in mainland China
HSBC Bank Delaware
HSBC Trust Company (Delaware), N.A., a US nationally chartered bank restricted to
which was incorporated in March 2007
trust activities
HSBC Bank Malaysia
HSBC Bank Maryland
HSBC Bank Middle East
HSBC Bank Nevada
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad
HSBC National Bank USA
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited, formerly The British Bank of the Middle East
HSBC Bank Nevada, NA, (formerly Household Bank (SB), N.A.) a nationally chartered
‘credit card bank’ in the US which is a subsidiary of HSBC Finance
HSBC Bank Panama
HSBC Bank (Panama) S.A., formerly Grupo Banistmo S.A., the leading banking group
HSBC Bank USA
HSBC’s retail bank in the US. From 1 July 2004, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (formerly
in Central America
HSBC Direct
HSBC Finance
HSBC France
HSBC Holdings
HSBC Mexico
HSBC Premier
HSBC Private Bank (Suisse)
IAS
IASB
IFRSs
IFRIC
Industrial Bank
HSBC Bank USA, Inc.)
HSBC’s online banking and savings proposition
HSBC Finance Corporation, the US consumer finance company acquired in March 2003
(formerly Household International, Inc.)
HSBC’s French banking subsidiary, formerly CCF S.A.
HSBC Holdings plc, the parent company of HSBC
HSBC México S.A., the commercial banking subsidiary of Grupo Financiero HSBC,
S.A. de C.V. and the fifth-largest bank in Mexico by deposits and assets
HSBC’s premium global banking service
HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) S.A., HSBC’s private bank in Switzerland (formerly HSBC
Republic Bank (Suisse) S.A.)
International Accounting Standard
International Accounting Standards Board
International Financial Reporting Standards
International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
Industrial Bank Co. Limited, a national joint-stock bank in mainland China of which
Hang Seng currently has a 12.78 per cent interest
IPO
IRB
IVAs
KEB
Key Management Personnel
KPI
KPMG
LIBOR
Losango
Initial public offering
Internal ratings-based approach to implementing Basel II
Individual voluntary arrangements (UK)
Korea Exchange Bank
Directors and Group Managing Directors of HSBC Holdings
Key performance indicator
KPMG Audit Plc and its affiliates
London Interbank Offer Rate
Losango Promoções e Vendas Ltda, the Brazilian consumer finance company acquired
in December 2003
Mainland China
MBSs
Metris
M&S Money
People’s Republic of China excluding Hong Kong
US mortgage-backed securities
Metris Companies Inc., US credit card issuer acquired in December 2005
Marks and Spencer Retail Financial Services Holdings Limited, acquired by HSBC in
November 2004
MSCI
MSRs
NA
Net investment hedges
NYSE
Morgan Stanley Capital International index
Mortgage servicing rights
Nationally Chartered, a designation for certain categories of banks in the US
Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation
New York Stock Exchange
466
Abbreviations used
Brief description
OCC
OFT
Patriot Act
Performance Shares
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (US)
Office of Fair Trading (UK)
The US Patriot Act of October 2001
Awards of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares under employee share plans that are subject
Ping An Insurance
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Limited, the second-largest life insurer
to corporate performance conditions
PPI
Premier
PVIF
QDII
Repos
Restricted shares
Reverse repos
RMB
RMM
RPI
Seasoning
S&P
SEC
SIP
SIS
SIV
SME
Solitaire
SPE
Sub-prime
in the PRC, in which HSBC currently has 16.78 per cent interest
Payment protection insurance
HSBC Premier, a global banking and wealth management service for affluent customers
Present value of in-force long-term insurance business
The Chinese government’s Qualified Domestic Institutional Investors scheme
Sale and repurchase transactions
Awards of HSBC Holdings ordinary shares to which the employee will become entitled,
normally after three years, subject to remaining an employee
Securities purchased under commitments to sell
renminbi, the currency of mainland China
Risk Management Meeting
Retail price index (UK)
The emergence of credit loss patterns in portfolios over time
Standard and Poor’s rating agency
Securities and Exchange Commission (US)
Statement of investment principles produced by trustees of defined pension plans
Structured Investment Solutions
Structured investment vehicles
Small and medium-sized enterprise
Solitaire Funding Limited, a special purpose entity managed by HSBC
Special purpose entity
A US description for customers who have limited credit histories, modest incomes, high
debt-to-income ratios, high loan-to-value ratios (for real estate secured products) or
have experienced credit problems caused by occasional delinquencies, prior
charge-offs, bankruptcy or other credit-related actions
The Chinese Bank
The Chinese Bank. Co., Ltd., which HSBC signed an agreement to acquire in
December 2007
The Hongkong and Shanghai
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, the founding member of the
Banking Corporation
HSBC Group
TSR
TSR award
UAE
UK
UK GAAP
US
VAR
VNAV
WHIRL
WTAS
Total shareholder return
TSR measure applied to half of the award of Performance Shares under
The HSBC Share Plan
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
United States of America
Value at risk
Variable Net Asset Value
Worldwide Household International Revolving Lending system
Wealth and Tax Advisory Services, Inc.
467
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
Index
Accounting
developments (future) 345
policies (critical) 132
policies (significant) 347
requirements in UK and Hong Kong 452
Accounts
approval 452
basis of preparation 16, 344
Annual General Meeting 321, 456
Areas of special interest 216, 257
Assets
by customer group 16, 393
by geographical region 36, 387
charged as security 436
deployment 161
held in custody and under administration 162
intangible 411
other 416
trading 161, 397
Associates and joint ventures
interests in 362, 407
share of profit in 159
Audit committee (Group) 301
Auditors’ remuneration 377
Auditors’ Report 334
Balance sheet
average 164
consolidated 338
data 3, 17, 21, 26, 28, 31, 33, 43, 56, 59, 69,
75, 88, 92, 107, 111, 123
HSBC Holdings 341
Basel II 284, 288
Borrowings (short-term) 177
Business highlights 17, 21, 25, 28
Business performance review
Europe 44, 50
Hong Kong 60, 64
Latin America 112, 117
North America 93, 99
Rest of Asia-Pacific 76, 82
Calendar (dividends) 453, 454
Capital
management and allocation 282
return on invested capital 1
structure (Basel I) 286, (Basel II) 288
Capital and performance ratios 2
Cash flow
accounting policy 361
consolidated statement 340
HSBC Holdings 343
notes 444
payable under financial liabilities 244
projected scenario analysis 246
Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking
statements 4
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits
(maturity analysis) 182
Collateral and credit enhancements 200, 228
Commercial Banking
business highlights 21
performance in Europe 46, 52
performance in Hong Kong 62, 65
performance in Latin America 115, 120
performance in North America 97, 103
performance in Rest of Asia-Pacific 78, 84
products and services 127
strategic direction 21
Committees (board) 300
Communication with shareholders 320
Community involvement 319
Competitive environment 37
Conduits 188
Constant currency 131
Contents inside front cover, 10, 131, 192, 289, 322,
336, 453
Contingent liabilities and contractual
commitments 445
Contractual obligations 178
Corporate governance
codes 299
report 289
Corporate sustainability 318
committee 304
reporting 320
Cost efficiency ratio 1, 159
Credit coverage ratios 2
Credit exposure 203
Credit quality of loans and advances 201, 223
Credit risk
management thereof 198
insurance 275
Critical accounting policies 132
Cross-border exposures 203, 222
Customer accounts 43, 59, 74, 91, 110
Customer groups and global businesses 16, 33
Daily distribution of revenues 250
Dealings in HSBC Holdings plc shares 321
Debt securities in issue 418
accounting policy 361
rating agency designation 215
Defined terms inside front cover
Deposits
average balances and average rates 180
Derivatives 399
accounting policy 353
Directors
biographies 289
board of directors 295
emoluments 329, 376
interests 306
non-executive 328
other directorships 328
pensions 330
remuneration (executive) 322
responsibilities (statement of) 333
service contracts 328
share plans 330
Dividends 1, 320, 386, 453, 454
Donations 320
Earnings per share 1, 386
Economic briefing
Europe 44, 49
468
Hong Kong 60, 64
Latin America 111, 117
North America 92, 99
Rest of Asia-Pacific 74, 81
Economic profit 163
Employees 307
compensation and benefits 317, 365
disabled 308
involvement 308
remuneration policy 308
Enforceability of judgements made in the US 453
Enquiries (from shareholders) 457
Equity 441
Europe
balance sheet data 43, 56
business performance 44, 50
competitive environment 38
economic briefing 44, 49
lending 207
loan impairment charges 226, 230, 237
profit/(loss) 42, 43, 56
regulation and supervision (UK) 193
Events after the balance sheet date 452
Exchange controls and other limitations affecting
equity security holders 453
Fee income (net) 141
Fair value
accounting policy 348
Financial assets
designated at fair value 398
net exposure to credit risk 205
Financial assets and liabilities
by measurement basis 393
accounting policy 355
Financial guarantee contracts
accounting policy 359
Financial highlights 1
Financial instruments designated at fair value
accounting policy 352
fair value 426
net income from 146, 362
critical accounting policy (valuation) 134
Financial investments 403
accounting policy 352
concentration of exposure 205
gains less losses from 148
Financial liabilities designated at fair value 417
Financial risks (insurance) 271
Financial statements 336
Five-year comparison 3
Foreign exchange
accounting policy 359
exposures 256, 435
rates 3
Funds under management 162
Geographical regions 36
Global Banking and Markets
business highlights 25
performance in Europe 48, 54
performance in Hong Kong 63, 67
performance in Latin America 116, 122
performance in North America 98, 104
469
performance in Rest of Asia-Pacific 80, 85
products and services 127
strategic direction 25
Glossary 464
Goodwill
accounting policy 356
and intangible assets 409
critical accounting policy 133
Governance codes 299
HSBC Holdings/New York Stock Exchange
corporate governance differences 299
Group Chairman’s Statement 6
Health and safety 319
History and development of HSBC 461
Hong Kong
balance sheet data 59, 69
business performance 60, 64
competitive environment 39
economic briefing 60, 64
lending 207
loan impairment charges 227, 230, 237
profit/(loss) 59, 69
regulation and supervision 193
HSBC Holdings plc
balance sheet 341
cash flow 343
credit risk 240
dividends 454
employee emoluments 376
fair value of financial instruments 430
financial assets and liabilities 396
liquidity and funding management 247
maturity analysis of assets and liabilities 434
related party transactions 451
statement of changes in total equity 342
structural foreign exchange exposures 256
subordinated liabilities 425
Impairment
accounting policy 349
allowances and charges 153, 225, 229, 235
assessment 201
collectively assessed 202
critical accounting policy 132
individually assessed 201
loan write-offs 203
losses as percentage of loans and advances 240
movement by industry and geographical
region 230
Income statement
consolidated 135, 337
Information on HSBC (availability thereof) 458
Insurance
accounting policy 360
claims incurred (net) and movements in
liabilities to policyholders 152, 364
liabilities under contracts issued 419
net earned premiums 149, 363
risk management 264
Interest income (net) 138
accounting policy 347
analysis of changes in 171
average balance sheet 164
H S B C H O L D I N G S P L C
lndex (continued)
forgone on impaired loans 227
sensitivity 254
Interim results 456
Internal control 304
International Financial Reporting Standards
Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards
comparison 344, 452
Investment contracts
accounting policy 361
Investor relations 458
Key performance indicators
financial 11
non-financial 13
Latin America
balance sheet data 111, 123
business performance 112, 117
competitive environment 40
economic briefing 111, 117
lending 207
loan impairment charges 227, 230, 238
loans and advances to customers (net) 110,
(gross) 214
profit/(loss) 110, 111, 123
Lease commitments 447
accounting policy 357
Legal
proceedings/risk 129, 261
litigation 448
Liabilities
by geographical region 387
other 419
subordinated 422
trading 417
Life insurance business 264
Liquidity and funding
management thereof 243
insurance 278
Loans and advances
accounting policy 349
by country/region 42, 59, 73, 91, 110
credit quality of 201, 223
concentration of exposure 204
delinquency in the US 221
by industry sector and geographic
region 209
impairment 225
maturity and interest sensitivity 179
to banks/customers by geographic region 209,
225
US loan modifications 228
Management Board (Group) 301
Market risk
management thereof 248
insurance 272
Maturity analysis of assets and liabilities 433
Maximum exposure to credit risk 203
Memorandum and Articles of Association 456
Minority interests 436
Money market funds 186
Monoline insurers 259
Mortgage lending 217, 218, 258
Nomination committee 303
470
Non-interest income
accounting policy 347
Non-life insurance business 265
Non-trading portfolios 252
North America
balance sheet data 92, 107
business performance 93, 99
competitive environment 40
economic briefing 92, 99
lending 207, 217-222
loan delinquency in the US 221
loan impairment charges 227, 230, 238
mortgage lending 258
profit/(loss) 91, 92, 107
regulation and supervision (US) 194
Off-balance sheet arrangements
and special purpose entities 183
other and commitments 191
Operating expenses 156
Operating income (net) 365, (other) 150
Operational risk management 260
Organisational structure chart 463
Other (notes) 31
in Europe 49, 55
in Hong Kong 63, 68
in Latin America 117, 122
in North America 99, 106
in Rest of Asia-Pacific 81, 87
Pensions
accounting policy 358
for directors 330
risk 253, 262
Personal Financial Services
business highlights 17
performance in Europe 45, 50
performance in Hong Kong 60, 64
performance in Latin America 113, 118
performance in North America 93, 100
performance in Rest of Asia-Pacific 76, 83
products and services 126
strategic direction 17
Personal lending 216-222
Principal activities 10
Private Banking
business highlights 28
performance in Europe 48, 55
performance in Hong Kong 63, 67
performance in Latin America 116, 122
performance in North America 98, 105
performance in Rest of Asia-Pacific 81, 86
products and services 128
strategic direction 28
Products and services 126, 216
Profit before tax
by country 42, 72, 91, 110
by customer group 16, 17, 21, 25, 28, 31, 33,
391
by geographical region 36, 43, 56, 59, 69, 75,
88, 92, 107, 111, 123
consolidated 337, 388
data 3
underlying/reported reconciliations 15, 20, 24,
27, 30, 44, 60, 76, 93, 112
Property, plant and equipment 129, 412
accounting policy 356
valuation of land and buildings 129
Provisions 422
accounting policy 359
PVIF 280, 410
Ratios
advances to deposits 244
capital and performance 2
credit coverage 2
cost efficiency 2, 159
earnings to combined fixed charges 178
net liquid assets to customer liabilities 245
Regulation and supervision 192
Related party transactions 449
Remuneration committee 303, 322
Renegotiated loans 227
Reputational risk management 263
Residual value risk management 260
Rest of Asia-Pacific
balance sheet data 75, 88
business performance 76, 82
competitive environment 39
economic briefing 74, 81
lending 207
loan impairment charges 227, 230, 237
loans and advances to customers (net) 73,
(gross) 214
profit/(loss) 72, 75, 88
Risk elements in loan portfolio 241
Risk management 197
capital management and allocation 282
contingent liquidity 247
credit 198
insurance operations 264
legal 261
liquidity and funding management 243
market 248, 257
operational 260
pension 262
reputational 263
residual value 260
security and fraud 262
sustainability 263
Risk-weighted assets
by principal subsidiary 286
Sale and repurchase agreements
accounting policy 353
Securities held for trading (concentration of
exposure) 205
Securitisations 190
and other structured transactions 406
Segment analysis 387
accounting policy 348
Senior management
biographies 292
Share-based payments 378
accounting policy 358
Share capital 437
accounting policy 361
and reserves 174
notifiable interests in 320
Share information 2
Share option plans
Bank of Bermuda plans 316
discretionary plans 312
for directors 330
for employees 309
HSBC Finance and subsidiary plans 314
HSBC France and subsidiary plans 313
Shareholder (communications with) 320
profile 456
Special purpose entities 183
Staff numbers 156, 307
Statement of recognised income and expense 339
Stock symbols 455
Strategic direction 10, 17, 21, 25, 28
Structural foreign exchange exposure 256
Structured credit transactions 190
Structured investment vehicles (SIVs) 183
Subsidiaries 414
accounting policy 355
Supplier payment policy 319
Sustainability
investing in 318
reporting 320
risk management 263
Taxation
accounting policy 357
expense 383
UK residents 458
US residents 460
Total shareholder return 11, 327
Trading assets 397
and financial investments and derivatives 161
accounting policy 351
Trading income (net) 144
Trading liabilities 417
accounting policy 351
Trading market (nature of) 454
Trading portfolios 251
Troubled debt restructurings 241
Value at risk 249
471
STOCKBROKERS
Goldman Sachs
Peterborough Court
133 Fleet Street
London EC4A 2BB
United Kingdom
HSBC Bank plc
8 Canada Square
London E14 5HQ
United Kingdom
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC
Incorporated in England on 1 January 1959 with
limited liability under the UK Companies Act
Registered in England: number 617987
REGISTERED OFFICE AND
GROUP HEAD OFFICE
8 Canada Square
London E14 5HQ
United Kingdom
Telephone: 44 (0) 20 7991 8888
Facsimile: 44 (0) 20 7992 4880
Web: www.hsbc.com
REGISTRARS
Principal Register
Computershare Investor Services PLC
PO Box 1064, The Pavilions
Bridgwater Road
Bristol BS99 3FA
United Kingdom
Telephone: 44 (0) 870 702 0137
Hong Kong Overseas Branch Register
Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services
Limited
Hopewell Centre
Rooms 1806-1807
18th Floor
183 Queen’s Road East
Hong Kong
Telephone: 852 2862 8628
Bermuda Overseas Branch Register
Corporate Shareholder Services
The Bank of Bermuda Limited
6 Front Street
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Telephone: 1 441 299 6737
ADR Depositary
The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street
Floor 22W
New York, NY 10286
USA
Telephone: 1 888 269 2377
Paying Agent (France)
HSBC France
103 avenue des Champs Elysées
75419 Paris Cedex 08
France
Telephone: 33 1 40 70 22 56
472
© Copyright HSBC Holdings plc 2008
All rights reserved
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
or otherwise, without the prior written permission of
HSBC Holdings plc.
Published by Group Finance, HSBC Holdings plc,
London
Cover designed by Addison Corporate Marketing
Limited, London; text pages designed by Group
Communications (Asia), The Hongkong and Shanghai
Banking Corporation Limited, Hong Kong
Printed by St Ives Direct Limited, Crayford, UK, on
Revive 50:50 Silk paper using vegetable oil-based inks.
Made in Italy, the paper comprises 50% virgin fibre, 25%
de-inked post-consumer waste and 25% pre-consumer
waste. Pulps used are elemental chlorine-free.
The FSC logo identifies products which contain wood
from well-managed forests certified in accordance with
the rules of the Forest Stewardship Council.
Mixed Sources
SGS-COC-1732
© 1996 Forest Stewardship Council A.C.
Photography
Cover (front): Vietnam
China
(back): United Arab Emirates
Brazil
Group Chairman
Hoang Dinh Nam/AFP/
Getty Images
Philip Gostelow
Adam Hinton
Ary Diesendruck/
Getty Images
Niall McDiarmid
HSBC Holdings plc
8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom
Telephone: 44 020 7991 8888 Facsimile: 44 020 7992 4880
www.hsbc.com