Innophos Holdings Inc Annual Report 2013

Plain-text annual report

INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS 2013 A N N U A L R E P O R T 3 Innophos is a leading international producer of performance-critical and nutritional specialty ingredients, with applications in food, beverage, dietary supplements, pharmaceutical, oral care and industrial end markets. Innophos combines more than a century of experience in specialty phosphate manufacturing with a growing capability in a broad range of other specialty ingredients to supply a product range produced to stringent regulatory manufacturing standards and the quality demanded by customers worldwide. Innophos (cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:90)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:71)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:16) value products with industry-leading technical service. Headquartered in Cranbury, New Jersey, Innophos has manufacturing operations in Nashville, TN; Chicago Heights, IL; Chicago (Waterway), IL; Geismar, LA; Ogden, UT; North Salt Lake, UT; Salt Lake City, UT; Paterson, NJ; Green Pond, SC; Port Maitland, ON (Canada); Taicang (China); Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz and San Jose de Iturbide (Mission Hills), Guanajuato (Mexico). For more information please visit www.innophos.com. Revenues by Segment ($ Millions) Operating Income by Segment ($ Millions) 935 810 862 844 714 667 579 299 127 137 110 95 84 48 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Specialty Phosphates US/Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico GTSP & Other Specialty Phosphates US/Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico GTSP & Other Cumulative Return Comparison IPHS Russell 2000 Index 400% 300% 200% 100% 0% 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities (cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3) (cid:20)(cid:28)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:17)(cid:3) (cid:3) (cid:36)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:262)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3) (cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3) (cid:73)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:3) (cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3) (cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:71)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3) (cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:78)(cid:86)(cid:3) (cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3) (cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:79)(cid:88)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3) (cid:69)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:29)(cid:3) incomplete or preliminary information; changes in government regulations and policies; continued acceptance of Innophos’ products and services in the marketplace; competitive factors; technological changes; Innophos’ dependence upon suppliers; and other risks. For any of these factors, Innophos claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. INNOPHOS ANNUAL REPORT 2013 We continued to implement actions to improve operations and grow the core (cid:69)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:92)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3) better position than when we entered Dear Fellow Innophos Investors, As I look back on 2013, in spite of a very challenging year, we still continued to invest in the food, beverage and nutritional ingredient businesses and made good progress executing on our strategic initiatives to strengthen our performance and position us for stronger future growth and improved profitability. We generated net sales of $844 million for the year, down two percent, and diluted EPS of $2.21, but our strong balance sheet and free cash flow profile allowed for a continued increase to the dividend. Our results for the year reflected sluggish market demand, the lowest fertilizer prices in the last four years and acute headwinds like reduced government spending which significantly affected sales in limited product lines. While faced with these challenges, we continued to implement actions to improve operations and grow the core business, and exited the year in a significantly better position than when we entered. In fact, the fourth quarter delivered the highest levels of operating income and margin for Specialty Phosphates in nearly two years. Our improved income and margin was supported by the strength of our Specialty Ingredients product line, where volumes grew four percent organically, as well as improved costs and higher overall average selling prices for the US and Canada business. Our Coatzacoalcos facility experienced certain maintenance and operating issues in the first half of the year as well as the extended planned maintenance outage in the third quarter. But our actions and investments to improve the future reliability and capability of this facility have enabled significantly improved operating performance, and we ended 2013 achieving our best yields of the year in the fourth quarter while also setting new monthly and annual production records on our Specialty Ingredients unit. We are excited about the improved operations and increased capability of our Coatzacoalcos facility, which will play an integral part of our growth strategy as well as help to enhance profitability across our businesses. Strategic Growth Initiatives We achieved a number of important accomplishments in 2013, positioning us well to deliver above-market growth rates, while strengthening our product portfolio and market position. In Mexico, our focus will be on supporting growth and profitability by further enhancing the capability, reliability and efficiency of our Coatzacoalcos facility. To this end, we recently commissioned a new, higher grade purified phosphoric acid (“PPA”) operation in Mexico that will provide greater efficiency and flexibility in that region, support our US and Canada network and strengthen our product mix in Latin America. We continued to make progress on our geographic expansion initiatives which contributed to strong export sales from the US, up nine percent for the year. Our new food ingredients manufacturing facility and laboratory in China helped support progress in the Asia-Pacific region, enabling 10 percent growth from the US and Canada to Asia-Pacific in 2013. Export sales were also strong to Europe, Middle East and Africa, as we made enhancements to our operations and supply chain while improving customer education. We view these export regions and Latin America as strong growth areas for Innophos, especially for the food and beverage markets. From a product development standpoint, our sodium reduction product, Cal-Rise®, continues to perform very well, recording over 60 percent volume growth for 2013 compared to 2012. We continue to invest in product development and applications to support above market growth rates. Nutrition Businesses Mexico Looking Ahead At the start of the fourth quarter of 2013, Innophos completed its fourth acquisition in a little over two years. We acquired substantially all of the assets of privately- held Chelated Minerals International, Inc. (CMI), based in the Salt Lake City area. CMI has significant technology and know- how in the manufacture, application, and science of chelated minerals supplied to the human nutrition market. The acquisition of CMI strengthens our position in dietary minerals for health and enables us to supply a broad range of nutrition fortification solutions to our customers. While the acquisition was modest in size, it provides valuable technology that can be exploited through the existing channels of our recently- acquired businesses, AMT and Kelatron, which provide high-quality, custom ingredients to the mineral fortification industry. Collectively our nutrition businesses are expected to grow in excess of the six to eight percent projected market growth rates for 2014. Going forward, we remain focused on opportunities to expand our position in the high-growth micronutrient ingredients sector, which provides us with an enhanced long-term platform for growth that complements our strong position in Specialty Phosphates. US and Canada In our US and Canada Specialty Phosphates business, sales increased seven percent for the year driven by acquisition benefits and three percent higher volumes in our core business, partially offset by unfavorable product mix. 2013 growth rates and operating income were negatively affected by lower sales of INNOVALT®, a valuable performance enhancer, due to lower asphalt market demand from reduced government spending. However, we remain optimistic regarding the long- term growth prospects of this innovative product line. We anticipate deferred projects will come back online and local governments will once again resume investing in repairing and updating their aging infrastructure. We began to see some encouraging signs in the second half of the year as we completed a successful paving trial in one state likely to approve our product, and are making progress in five of the remaining nine unapproved states. This more favorable outlook for growth extends to export markets as well, with trials planned or recently completed in two South American countries, as well as growing market opportunities in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. We also generated great performance in our low sodium product line and our recently acquired nutrition businesses overall. Our performance for the year in Mexico was negatively affected by premature equipment failures that caused production issues in the first half of 2013 as well as an extended planned maintenance outage in the third quarter at our Coatzacoalcos facility. As a result, Specialty Phosphates sales were down 10 percent for the year, primarily on lower volumes, and operating income was $10 million lower than the previous year. However, we exited the year on a high note and generated significantly improved profitability levels in the fourth quarter from better sales mix, greater levels of efficiency and improved operations. In fact, we achieved the best yields of the year at Coatzacoalcos in the fourth quarter, up 490 basis points from our first quarter 2013 low, and we also set new monthly and annual production records at our Specialty Ingredients plant. Although 2013 was a difficult year for us in Mexico, we are confident in our outlook for this region. The Coatzacoalcos plant is now operating normally and achieving yields recorded prior to the first half 2013 reliability issues. In 2014, we will undergo a heavy maintenance capital program across the company, but in particular in Mexico, which has always been part of our longer-term plant upgrade program. We expect these efforts will enable us to achieve higher yields than previously demonstrated, along with better capability and reliability. We are starting to reap the benefits of these efforts and will continue to invest for long-term growth throughout the Latin American region. Fertilizer Market Weak market demand drove market fertilizer selling prices to four-year lows during the year. Prices have since recovered, with an increase of approximately 20% in January 2014 from mid-December levels, and have continued to increase further in February, with reports showing prices 25-30% higher than mid- December levels. The significantly lower selling prices in 2013 had a pronounced effect on our Granulated Triple Superphosphate (“GTSP”) & Other segment, which reported a decline in revenue of 36 percent for the year, and a net loss. We expect profitability to return to break-even in the second quarter 2014 based on March 2014 market price indications. As I have said before, GTSP is roughly 10 percent of our revenue and is not a core focus of the business. However, it is a necessary piece of our economic model as it represents a salable co-product that arises in our Mexico acid purification process. In 2014, we expect low double-digit growth from our nutrition businesses. We are also poised for a recovery in asphalt market demand, and in particular for our INNOVALT product line. These factors, along with the improved operations at our Coatzacoalcos facility and our focus on geographic expansion and innovation, give us confidence in our outlook of three to five percent volume growth for Specialty Phosphates in 2014, which is more than double the market growth rate of one to two percent. Even though market conditions are expected to remain challenging, we are confident in our growth strategy and market position. Finally, we remain committed to maximizing shareholder value by leveraging our strong cash flow and balance sheet both to support growth and to improve cash returns to shareholders. During the year, we executed on this strategy through our acquisition of CMI as well as increasing our quarterly dividend rate for the fourth time in three years, which now stands at an attractive $0.40 per share. We also bought back 150,000 shares for $7.1 million in the fourth quarter, consistent with our approach to offset dilution from equity awards at attractive prices. In 2014, we expect capital expenditures to be in the range of $45 million to $50 million. Dividend payments will be roughly $35 million at the current quarterly rate. Adding in share repurchases consistent with what we have done in the past gets us close to $90 million in projected capital deployment in 2014. Investments beyond this amount will be focused on supporting growth, particularly through strategic M&A, as well as opportunistically returning cash to shareholders as we deem appropriate and prudent. As always, we will continue to discuss the best uses of our cash with our Board throughout the year. In closing, I want to thank our employees, customers, suppliers and shareholders for their support and contribution to another productive year for Innophos. I look forward to executing and achieving our goals for 2014 and beyond. Randy Gress Chief Executive Officer & Chairman April 25, 2014 INNOPHOS ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Our 2014 Goals We target Specialty Phosphate operating income margins of 14% to 15% for 2014. This will be achieved by targeting volume growth of 3% to 5%, which is above the Company’s estimated market rate of growth of approximately 1% to 2%, and by sustaining or moderately improving the profitability of our growing volume base. This is based on the improved operations at our Coatzacoalcos facility, low double- digit growth expectations for our nutrition business and the recovery of our INNOVALT® product line for asphalt markets. This is further supported by the strength of our leading market position in an attractive industry that is less vulnerable to economic cycles. The following highlight our plan to successfully execute on our long-term goals: Target Growth Enhance Supply Chain We are targeting to exceed our market growth rates by 2% to 3% through product innovation and geographic expansion. We will build on our already attractive strategic position particularly by continuing to enhance our industry leading supply chain. 2014 Invest in Facilities Generate Cash Flow We are investing in our facilities to strengthen the reliability, efficiency and flexibility of our operations. We expect to generate solid cash flow to support our growth initiatives as well as return cash to shareholders. 2013 Achievements Acquired Chelated Minerals International, expanding our position in the high- growth micronutrient ingredients sector and our long-term platform for growth that complements our strong position in Specialty Phosphates. Increased investments in new product applications to ensure faster and more efficient market success for new developments and satisfying future performance needs. Significant investments in our Coatzacoalcos facility to restore our operating capability and reliability, leading to improved phosphoric acid yields each quarter of the year, with fourth quarter performance at 490 basis points higher than the first quarter low point. Commissioned a new, higher grade food and beverage PPA operation in Mexico to support our US and Canada network and add strength to our product mix in Latin America. Established new monthly and annual production records on the Coatzacoalcos Specialty Ingredients unit. Continued investment in support of Mexico’s capability to process multiple grades of phosphate rock consistent with the Company’s supply chain diversification strategy. Grew export sales out of the US and Canada by nine percent compared to 2012, supported by the permitting and start-up of a blending facility and laboratory in Taicang, China. Increased quarterly dividend by 14% to the current rate of $0.40/share, our fourth increase in three years. Strong cash flow from operations of $91 million supported $77 million of investments, higher dividend payments and share repurchases along with $13 million of debt repayments. 66% Specialty Ingredients Baking (cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:88)(cid:73)(cid:262)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3) (cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:88)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86) Meat & Seafood Keeps meat or seafood moist and tender during processing, storage and cooking Processed Cheese Controls melting properties of cheese slices, blocks and shreds Potatoes Beverage Prevents unwanted discoloration during french fry manufacture (cid:54)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:88)(cid:80)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:88)(cid:80)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:88)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:3) range of beverages, from soy milk to sports drinks Pharmaceutical Excipients Contributes essential minerals to nutritional supplements and through superior tableting performance allows for proper dosing of active ingredients Oral Care Asphalt Horticulture Fire Safety Provides tartar control and abrasive properties to enable cleaning without damage to enamel; helps prevent cavities Improves road durability under both high- and low-temperature conditions Specialized soluble nutrients for drip irrigation (cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:262)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:263)(cid:68)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:74)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:90) Water Treatment Prevents build-up of impurities in municipal and industrial water systems (cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81) (cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:93)(cid:92)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:262)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3) dietary supplements and sports nutrition Products and Applications Innophos products have a wide variety of applications. Above are some examples of the properties Innophos’ products bring to customers across key industries. In blue are the three product categories within the core Specialty Phosphates business. Details on co-products are shown in green. Percentages in section heads represent the category’s contribution to 2013 revenues. Innophos continues to invest in research and development (R&D) and technical services and applications that are the most competitive in the Specialty Phosphates industry. Innophos’ scientists are working to leverage Innophos’ extensive history as a leader in Specialty Phosphates as well as its newly acquired technologies to Revenues by End Market ($ Millions) Total Sales 844 CAGR 6% 5% -10% 6% 14% Total Sales 579 97 145 129 208 07 129 75 186 454 13 Pharma, Food, Beverage & Oral Care Industrial Detergents Fertilizer & Horticulture develop products that include: calcium and magnesium to support bone health, chromium for weight loss, selenium for healthy aging as well as products aimed at reducing sodium intake in the diet, among other areas. Innophos also supports R&D efforts by partnering with universities and research institutions, putting the Company in a strong and effective technical position to support customers. Phosphates for Meat and Poultry Processing Low sodium is not just for baking. Innophos offers a complete range of phosphates for meat and poultry applications. From retaining moisture and texture to maintaining flavor, phosphates play an important role in the meat and poultry industry. Our new blends help achieve low sodium requirements for meat and poultry products to develop healthier and tastier foods. For example, our Curavis® So-Lo93 blend enhances processed meat and poultry, without compromising taste, by reducing sodium by 93% compared to standard sodium phosphates, while maintaining good binding qualities and pH formulated for optimum taste and appearance. Our SuperBind® product is a sodium phosphate blend that produces very good cooking yields, superior retention in low salt meat products and higher use of lower binding meats while maintaining yield and texture. Phosphates for Fitness The beverage market is one of the largest and most dynamic segments in the food industry. The industry continues to grow, offering health conscious consumers new product choices that meet their demands, including sports beverages, dairy beverages, meal replacements, soy beverages, dry mixes and enhanced water. Phosphates are used widely in all beverage applications as they serve various functions. Innophos realizes the need for high quality functional phosphates and we continue to provide innovative products that meet customer demands to formulate the best quality beverages. Innophos developed industry leading products to enhance the health of beverages, including its VersaCAL® applications, which provides calcium fortification for a wide variety of beverages. Phosphorus and Calcium for Bone Health Phosphorus is fundamental to growth, maintenance, and repair of all body tissues, and is necessary, along with calcium and magnesium, for proper growth and formation of bones in infants and children. Sufficient levels of phosphorus intake are important throughout life to ensure the proper balance of essential minerals in order to promote remineralization of bones and teeth to keep them in a healthy state. As an excipient and nutraceutical ingredient, Innophos calcium phosphates provide the flexibility to deliver calcium and phosphorus with the most effective combination of dissolution, bioavailability and mouth feel to make the customer’s formulations a market success. Additionally, Innophos’ ongoing research has ensured that our products meet the needs of the world’s evolving health and nutrition demands. In addition to our internal research facilities, Innophos maintains academic research partnerships, such as the Osteoporosis Research Center of Creighton University, to continually support customers with the products and services needed to provide high- performance nutritional supplements. INNOPHOS ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Beverage Provides tartness in colas without taste overtones Water Treatment Prevents accumulation of potentially harmful impurities in municipal water Metal Treatment (cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:75)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:88)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:262)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:75) Detergents Ingredient in consumer-oriented laundry detergents Industrial Cleaning Detergent formulations with phosphate provide superior cleaning performance in challenging environments Phosphate Fertilizer (cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:83)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:234)(cid:42)(cid:55)(cid:54)(cid:51)(cid:235)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:93)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:92)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3) vineyard cultivation 17% Food & Technical (cid:42)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:262)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3) (cid:51)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:11)(cid:234)(cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:36)(cid:235)(cid:12) 9% Sodium Tripolyphosphate (cid:11)(cid:234)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:51)(cid:51)(cid:235)(cid:12)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3) Grade PPA 8% GTSP & Other Product Segment Performance Specialty Phosphates Specialty Phosphates comprise the three product categories below, Specialty Ingredients, Food and Technical Grade Purified Phosphoric Acid (“PPA”) and Sodium Tripolyphosphate (“STPP”) & Detergent Grade PPA. In 2013, sales revenue increased 3% versus 2012 on a 4% benefit from acquisitions that exceeded a 1% decline in core business volumes primarily due to the first half 2013 production issues in Coatzacoalcos, Mexico. Specialty Ingredients Specialty Ingredients encompasses a wide range of mineral-based specialty compounds providing performance critical ingredients to food and beverage, pharmaceutical and oral care end markets, as well as select high- performance industrial end markets. These differentiated, high-value products provide stable demand and strong margins. Sales revenue increased 8% versus 2012 primarily on higher volumes. Acquisitions contributed 6% to volume growth and organic volumes contributed 3% while overall prices declined 1% primarily due to sales mix. Specialty Ingredients are the primary area of focus for Innophos’ business both within and outside North America. Food and Technical Grade PPA Most of Innophos’ PPA is converted into Specialty Ingredients at dedicated facilities. Some food grade PPA is sold directly to customers for applications such as cola beverages. In addition, technical grades of PPA are used in municipal water treatment and metal finishing. Our Coatzacoalcos, Mexico facility is capable of producing a wide range of higher grade PPA, which is key to successfully delivering growth from the higher value products. During the year, we invested in our Coatzacoalcos facility to improve its operating performance and future reliability after first half production issues eliminated any upside potential to sales. In 2013 sales declined 4% compared to 2012 on lower volumes. STPP and Detergent Grade PPA Detergent grade products include detergent grade PPA and STPP. Phosphates are very effective cleaning agents, in both laundry detergents and in specialized industrial cleaning applications, where high standards of cleanliness are required in challenging conditions. Over recent years, phosphates have been reformulated out of consumer- oriented detergents in the US and Canada although Latin America remains an important market for these products. Sales were 17% lower than 2012 on lower volumes as we continue to focus on shifting business towards higher value Specialty Ingredients. GTSP and Other Co-products Fertilizer co-products, such as GTSP, produced sales revenue of $67 million in 2013, down 36% compared to 2012, on lower volumes resulting from weak market demand that drove phosphate fertilizer market prices to four-year lows in the second half of 2013. Profitable markets for the Company’s co-products are important to the overall value of the Company’s Mexico manufacturing facilities. The outlook for GTSP & Other is not as clear as with Specialty Phosphates, but we expect to return to break-even operating income in the second quarter 2014 based on March market price indications. While it’s difficult to predict the direction in which fertilizer market prices will move for the remainder of 2014, it should be noted that Innophos margins are typically advantaged in inflationary market conditions, with raw material cost increases lagging changes in fertilizer market selling prices by three or more months. Similarly, margins can be disadvantaged during deflationary market conditions. Revenues by Product Line ($ Millions) 118 216 150 34 82 74 80 107 109 451 451 444 105 91 152 98 92 134 486 514 67 75 146 556 70 131 85 293 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 Specialty Ingredients Food & Technical Grade PPA STPP & Detergent Grade PPA GTSP & Other INNOPHOS ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Innophos’ acquisition strategy seeks to strengthen the Company’s market position in high-growth market segments and geographies Balance Sheet and Capital Allocation Innophos currently operates with a strong balance sheet, and has been able to increase both investments for growth and cash returns to shareholders. During the year, Innophos completed its fourth acquisition in just over two years with the purchase of Chelated Minerals International, a privately held company in Salt Lake City, Utah. Additionally, the Company invested in its core product innovation, geographic expansion initiatives and infrastructure enhancements while continuing to return value to shareholders through dividend payments and a share repurchase program. Capital expenditures in 2013 were $33 million. Net debt decreased from $149 million at the end of 2012 to $130 million at the end of 2013 as cash provided from operations exceeded investments in the aforementioned areas. Innophos recognizes the importance of dividend income to shareholders and on October 30, 2013, announced that its Board of Directors declared an increase of 14% over the previous quarterly dividend rate to a new rate of $0.40 per share of common stock. Innophos has increased its dividend rate by nearly two and one-half times via four increases in less than three years. On August 11, 2011, Innophos’ Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for Company common stock of up to $50 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had repurchased 450,000 shares under the program for a total of $20.5 million, with 150,000 of those shares repurchased in 2013 for $7.1 million. The program is currently under a five-year time limit. At December 31, 2013, Innophos had $96 million principal amount of term loan debt and a $225 million revolving credit facility, of which $67 million was outstanding. Total remaining availability was approximately $156 million, taking into account approximately $2 million in face amount of letters of credit issued under the sub-facility. Given the Company’s available financial resources, management continues to target acquisitions to enhance growth. Innophos’ acquisition strategy seeks to strengthen the Company’s market position in high-growth market segments and geographies through extending the Company’s Specialty Phosphate capability or adding complementary adjacent product technologies. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC, 20549 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ FORM 10-K _______________________________________________________________________________________________ (cid:58)(cid:3) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (cid:133)(cid:3) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to _______________________________________________________________________________________________ INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Delaware (state or other jurisdiction of incorporation) 001-33124 (Commission File number) 20-1380758 (IRS Employer Identification No.) 259 Prospect Plains Road Cranbury, New Jersey 08512 (Address of Principal Executive Officer, including Zip Code) (609) 495-2495 (Registrants’ Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Common Stock, par value $.001 per share Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. (cid:58) Yes (cid:133) No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. (cid:133) Yes (cid:58) No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (cid:58) Yes (cid:133) No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:58) No (cid:133) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:58) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerated Filer (cid:58) Accelerated Filer (cid:133) Non-accelerated filer (cid:133) Smaller reporting company (cid:133) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (cid:133) Yes (cid:58) No The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.0 billion as of June 28, 2013, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter (based on the Nasdaq Global Select Market closing price on that date). As of February 4, 2014, the registrant had 22,348,092 shares of Common Stock outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of Innophos Holdings, Inc. Proxy Statement to be filed for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 20, 2014 Document Incorporated By Reference In Part No. III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) Page 1 of 82 Page 4 13 17 1 8 18 18 19 21 22 37 39 78 78 78 79 79 79 79 79 79 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Business Item 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Principal Accounting Fees and Services PART IV Item 15. Signatures Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Page 2 of 82 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information set forth in this report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions and other information that is not historical information. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. We may also make additional forward-looking statements from time to time. All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but there can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs and projections will result or be achieved. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward- looking statements contained in or contemplated by this report. The following are among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. There may be other factors, including those discussed elsewhere in this report, which may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of the risk factors specified in this Form 10-K. _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Unless the context otherwise indicates, all references in this report to the “Company,” “Innophos,” “we,” “us” or “our” or similar words are to Innophos Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Innophos Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and was incorporated July 15, 2004. Page 3 of 82 ITEM 1. BUSINESS Our Company PART I Innophos commenced operations as an independent company in August 2004 after purchasing our North American specialty phosphates business from affiliates of Rhodia, S.A., or Rhodia. In November 2006, we completed an initial public offering and listed our Common Stock for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “IPHS”. Innophos is a leading international producer of performance-critical and nutritional specialty ingredients with applications in food, beverage, dietary supplements, pharmaceutical, oral care and industrial end markets. Innophos combines more than a century of experience in specialty phosphate manufacturing with a growing capability in a broad range of other specialty ingredients to supply a product range produced to stringent regulatory manufacturing standards and the quality demanded by customers worldwide. Many of Innophos' products are application-specific compounds engineered to meet customer performance requirements and are often critical to the taste, texture, performance or nutritional content of foods, beverages, pharmaceuticals, oral care products and other applications. For example, Innophos products act as flavor enhancers in beverages, electrolytes in sports drinks, texture additives in cheeses, leavening agents in baked goods, pharmaceutical excipients, cleaning agents in toothpaste and provide a wide range of nutritional fortification solutions for food, beverage and nutritional supplement manufacturers. The Company has made recent acquisitions in the bioactive mineral ingredients sector. Bioactive mineral ingredients are mineral based ingredients for food, beverage and dietary supplement end markets that are manufactured to be readily digestible. Historically, Innophos has enjoyed a strong position in “macronutrients,” minerals such as calcium, magnesium and potassium that are required in relatively large amounts for a balanced diet. Through these acquisitions, the company now also has a strong position in "micronutrients" such as chromium, selenium, zinc and iron, small quantities of which are also essential to the human diet. The company's third acquisition was in the botanical and enzyme based specialty nutritional ingredients sector. As with the bioactive mineral ingredients, botanical and enzyme based ingredients are important to our customers for their nutritional value and mineral, botanical and specialty phosphate ingredients are often formulated together. The acquisitions described below together with Innophos' existing strength in specialty phosphates has created a strong position for Innophos in the attractive and high growth specialty nutritional ingredients market. In October 2011, Innophos acquired 100% of the stock of Kelatron's holding company, KI Acquisition, Inc., for a purchase price of approximately $21 million, subject to specified adjustments. Founded in 1975 and based in Ogden, Utah, Kelatron is a leading producer of technically advanced bioactive mineral ingredients, with a high quality base of customers in the dietary supplement and sports nutrition markets. In July 2012, Innophos acquired100% of the equity of AMT Labs, Inc. ("AMT") and an affiliated real estate company holding all AMT real property for $27 million, with $19.5 million being allocated to the AMT purchase and $7.5 million being allocated to the real estate entity. Located in North Salt Lake, Utah, AMT has been manufacturing high quality bioactive mineral ingredients for the food, beverage, confectionary and dietary supplement industries for more than 20 years. AMT has two manufacturing facilities and land available for further expansion. In December 2012, Innophos purchased all of the assets of Triarco Industries, Inc., ("Triarco"), for $45 million in cash plus $1 million in shares of Innophos Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Triarco, a privately held company based in New Jersey, has been manufacturing high quality custom ingredients for the food, beverage and dietary supplement industries for more than 30 years. Triarco specializes in botanical and enzyme based ingredients that provide important nutritional benefits and are often formulated with bioactive minerals and specialty phosphates. In October 2013, Innophos purchased all of the assets of Chelated Minerals International, Inc., (CMI), for $5 million in cash. CMI, a privately held company based in Salt Lake City, Utah, has significant know-how in the manufacture and science of chelated minerals supplied to the human nutrition market. The combined businesses of Kelatron, AMT, Triarco and CMI generate annual revenues in excess of $50 million with attractive positions in high growth end markets. Page 4 of 82 Key Product Lines We have four principal product lines: (i) Specialty Ingredients, (ii) Food and Technical Grade purified phosphoric acid, or PPA, (iii) Technical Grade Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP) & Detergent Grade PPA and iv) GTSP & Other . The first three product lines comprise our Specialty Phosphates reporting segments for US/Canada and Mexico, with GTSP & Other reported separately in a third reporting segment. Specialty Ingredients Specialty Ingredients (including specialty phosphate salts, specialty phosphoric acids and a range of other mineral and botanical based specialty ingredients) are the most highly engineered products in our portfolio. They have a wide range of applications such as flavor enhancers in beverages, electrolytes in sports drinks, texture modifiers in cheeses, leavening agents in baked goods, mineral and botanical sources for nutritional supplements, pharmaceutical excipients and abrasives in toothpaste. Specialty phosphoric acids are used in industrial applications such as asphalt modification and petrochemical catalysis. Page 5 of 82 The table below presents a list of the main Specialty Ingredients sold by us in 2013: Product Description/End-Use Application Sodium Aluminum Phosphate, Acidic and Basic (“SALP”) Sodium Acid PyroPhosphate (“SAPP”) Sodium HexaMetaPhosphate (“SHMP”) Monocalcium Phosphate (“MCP”) Calcium Acid Pyrophosphate (“CAPP”) Premier leavening agent for baking mixes, cakes, self-rising flours, baking powders, batter & breadings (acidic). Improves melting properties of cheese (basic). Leavening agent for baking powders, doughnuts, and biscuits; inhibits browning in potatoes; provides moisture and color retention in poultry and meat. Water treatment applications; anti-microbial and sequestrant in beverages; cheese emulsifier; improves tenderness in meat, seafood and poultry applications. Leavening agent in double-acting baking powder; acidulant; buffering agent. Calcium based, slow acting, multifunctional leavening acid used in a wide variety of baked goods Dicalcium Phosphate (“DCP”) Toothpaste abrasive; leavening agent; calcium fortification. Tricalcium Phosphate (“TCP”) Pharma Calcium Phosphates (“A-Tab®”, “Di-Tab®”, “Tri- Tab®”) Ammonium Phosphates (“MAP”, “DAP”) Potassium Phosphates (“TKPP”, “DKP”, “MKP”, “KTPP”) Calcium and phosphorus fortifier in food and beverage applications (e.g., orange juice, cereals, and cheese); flow aid; additive in expandable polystyrene. Excipients in vitamins, minerals, nutritional supplements and pharmaceuticals. High-end fertilizer products for horticultural use; flame retardant; cigarette additives; culture nutrient. Water treatment; sports drinks; buffering agent; improves tenderness in meat, seafood and poultry applications; horticulture applications. Specialty Acids (e.g., Polyacid) Additive improving performance properties of asphalt. Sodium Blends (e.g., Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP (food grade))) Ingredient improving yield, tenderness, shelf life, moisture and color retention in meat, seafood and poultry applications. Other (Sodium Bicarbonate, Tetrasodium Pyrophosphate (“TSPP”), Mono, Di, & Trisodium Phosphates (“MSP”, “DSP”, “TSP”)) Organic Mineral salts and blends including calcium, chromium, copper, iron, lithium, magnesium, manganese, phosphorous, potassium, selenium, strontium, vanadium, and zinc Plant based botanical, enzyme and mineral nutrients Baking powders; gelling agent in puddings; cheese emulsifiers. Bioactive mineral nutrients used in a wide variety of fortified foods, beverages and dietary supplements. Fortification for food, beverage and sports nutrition. Each salt or acid derivative typically has a number of different applications and end uses. For example, DCP can be used both as a leavening agent in bakery products and as an abrasive in oral care products. However, several food grade salts are unique to the end user in their particular finished product application. Manufacturers often work directly with customers to tailor products to their required specifications. Our major competitor in the downstream Specialty Ingredients is Israel Chemicals Limited, or ICL. Food and Technical Grade PPA Food and Technical Grade PPA are high purity forms of PPA, distinct from the agricultural-grade merchant green phosphoric acid, or MGA, used in fertilizer production. PPA is used to manufacture specialty phosphate salts and acids and is Page 6 of 82 also used directly in beverage applications as a flavor enhancer and in water treatment applications. We also sell Technical Grade PPA in the merchant market to third-party phosphate derivative producers. Our major PPA competitor is Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc., or PCS, a global fertilizer company for which specialty phosphates represents only a small part of its business. We consume the majority of our PPA production in our downstream operations and sell the remainder on the North American merchant market and to other downstream phosphate derivative producers, where we compete with PCS. To the best of our knowledge, PCS does not have any downstream technical or food grade phosphate derivative production capacity, other than a small potassium phosphate salt unit. We also compete with imports from China, Belgium and Israel. Technical Grade Sodium Tripolyphosphate (STPP) & Detergent Grade PPA STPP is a specialty phosphate derived from reacting phosphoric acid with a sodium alkali. STPP is a key ingredient in cleaning products, including industrial and institutional cleaners and automatic dishwashing detergents and consumer laundry detergents outside the U.S. In addition to its use in cleaning products, STPP is also used in water treatment, clay processing, and copper ore processing. Over 90% of the end use market for STPP is derived from consumer product applications. Detergent Grade PPA is a lower grade form of PPA used primarily in the production of STPP. Our major North American STPP competitor is Mexichem, S.A.B. de C.V., or Mexichem, in Mexico. Currently, Mexichem produces STPP at two manufacturing locations in Mexico. We also compete with imports from North Africa, Europe, Russia and China. Over the past several decades, there have been efforts to reduce the use of STPP in consumer and institutional cleaners. In the 1980’s, STPP use in consumer laundry applications was discontinued in the U.S. and Canada. STPP use was all but eliminated in consumer automatic dishwashing applications in the U.S. and Canada in 2010. The Industrial & Institutional market has also reformulated some of its products to reduce STPP content in an effort to market a lower cost and reduced phosphate content product line. GTSP & Other Granular Triple Super Phosphate, or GTSP, is a fertilizer product line produced at our Coatzacoalcos facility. GTSP is used throughout Latin America for increasing crop yields in a wide range of agricultural sectors. GTSP is made as a co-product of our purified wet acid manufacturing process. Our Industry The North American marketplaces for each of our product lines have seen consolidation to two primary producers and several secondary suppliers. We consider the two key producers in each product category to be: (i) our Company and ICL in Specialty Ingredients; (ii) our Company and PCS in Food and Technical Grade PPA; and (iii) our Company and Mexichem in Technical STPP. The production of specialty phosphates begins with phosphate rock, which can be processed in two alternative ways to produce PPA: (i) the thermal acid method, in which elemental phosphorus is combusted in a furnace and subsequently hydrated to produce purified phosphoric acid; or (ii) the purified wet acid method (PWA), in which mined phosphate rock is reacted with sulfuric acid to produce merchant green acid, (agricultural grade phosphoric acid), which is then purified through solvent-based extraction into purified phosphoric acid. The conversion of merchant green acid into PPA is a technically complex and a capital-intensive process. The thermal acid method of production is based on the electrolytic production of elemental phosphorus and is therefore electricity intensive, while phosphoric acid made by the purified wet acid process requires the use of significant amounts of sulfuric acid. The relative overall costs of the two methods depend on the availability and cost of their component processes, electricity and coke for the former and sulfur for the latter. PPA is reacted with appropriate mineral salts or inorganic compounds to produce various specialty phosphate salts or STPP as required. We currently use PPA manufactured via the wet acid process for all of our Specialty Ingredients manufacturing needs. Consolidation of producers has been most significant in the Specialty Ingredients market. In addition to consolidation of producers, uneconomic production capacity has been eliminated in North America across all three major specialty phosphate product categories during the last decade. For instance, in 2001, Rhodia closed its specialty salts and specialty acids plants in Buckingham, Quebec and Morrisville, Pennsylvania. In 2002, Vicksburg Chemical Company closed a specialty salts plant in Vicksburg, Mississippi. In 2003 and 2004, Astaris closed three manufacturing facilities, eliminating roughly 320,000 metric tons of capacity: a purified wet phosphoric acid plant in Conda, Idaho; a specialty salts plant in Trenton, Michigan; and an STPP plant in Green River, Wyoming. In January 2009, Mexichem closed its Coatzacoalcos facility eliminating approximately 50% of their estimated STPP capacity. Page 7 of 82 In June 2006, PCS started up a fourth PWA based PPA production train at its Aurora, NC facility, a capacity addition less than the estimated combined level of 2006 North American PPA imports and domestic PPA produced via the thermal process. The PCS capacity increase was also comparable in capacity to the Astaris Idaho plant closed in 2003 following a failed start- up. Innophos also produces a wide range of botanical, enzyme and mineral based nutrients through a variety of production processes customized to meet customer requirements through spray drying, roller compactions, fine grinding, wet granulations, solvent extractions and custom blending resulting in more than 2,000 product formulations, which include both chelated and custom processed ingredients, manufactured to enhance the nutritional benefit of the ingredient after digestion. The mineral industry is less consolidated than the specialty phosphates industry with Albion Minerals and Jost considered the leading competitors in mineral ingredients and Naturex and BI Nutraceuticals the leading competitors in botanical and enzyme ingredients, alongside a number of smaller producers. Penetration from Imports Over the past several years, we estimate that imports, including domestically located production facilities owned by foreign based organizations, have accounted for approximately 15-20% of the North American specialty phosphate market. This market share has been fairly stable for the last three years. The following are the primary importers of PPA products and derivatives into North America: (i) Prayon SA, or Prayon, and Rotem Amfert Negev Ltd. (a subsidiary of ICL) for PPA, with Prayon primarily supplying acid to its specialty salts manufacturing facility in Augusta, Georgia; and (ii) various European, Chinese, and Israeli specialty phosphate manufacturers such as Chemische Fabrik Budenheim, Hubei Xingfa, Jiangyin Chengxing, Guangxi Mingli and BK Giulini Chemie GmbH & Co. (a subsidiary of ICL) for specialty salts and STPP. Our Customers Our customer base is principally composed of consumer goods manufacturers, distributors and specialty chemical manufacturers. Our customers manufacture products such as soft drinks, sports drinks and juices, various food products, toothpaste and other dental products, petroleum and petrochemical products, and various cleaners and detergents. Our customers include major consumer goods manufacturers with global market recognition in the food, beverage, pharmaceutical and cleaning product markets. We have maintained long-term relationships with the majority of our key customers, with the average customer relationship having lasted over 15 years, and some relationships spanning many decades. Our specialty chemical products are often critical ingredients in the formulation of our customers’ products, and typically represent only a small percentage of their total product costs. As a result, we believe that the risks associated with our customers switching suppliers often outweigh the potential gains. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we generated net sales of $844.1 million, $862.4 million and $810.5 million, respectively. Raw Materials and Energy We purchase a range of raw materials and energy sources on the open market, including phosphate rock, sulfur and sulfuric acid, agricultural grade phosphoric acid (also known as MGA), PPA, natural gas and electricity. To help secure supply, we purchase several of our key raw materials under long-term contracts generally providing for fixed or minimum quantities of materials, or purchase of our full requirements, and predetermined pricing formulae based on various market indices and other factors. We do not engage in any significant futures or other derivative contracts to hedge against fluctuations of raw material. We are not integrated vertically back to our sources of supply by ownership interests, joint ventures or affiliated companies, as a result of which raw materials acquisition at economical price levels is an important risk of our business. See Item 1A “Raw Materials Availability and Pricing” of this Report Form 10-K. Phosphate Rock and Merchant Green Acid (MGA). MGA is the main raw material for the creation of our downstream salts and acids. We purchase MGA for processing at our Geismar, LA facility through a long-term agreement with PCS. At our Coatzacoalcos facility in Mexico, we typically purchase phosphate rock in order to produce MGA internally; however, we can also process externally purchased MGA, available from various suppliers globally. The Company has agreements with two preferred phosphate rock suppliers for 2014 to supply the Coatzacoalcos facility. In addition to these primary sources, the Company has options for other spot suppliers and will continue to qualify and develop additional sources for potential future supply. Sulfur and Sulfuric Acid. Sulfur is the key raw material used in the production of Sulfuric Acid. Sulfuric acid is a key raw material used in the production of merchant green acid. We produce the vast majority of the sulfuric acid required to operate our Coatzacoalcos facility. The majority of the sulfuric acid required for the production of MGA by PCS Geismar is supplied Page 8 of 82 by Rhodia. Our U.S. needs for sulfuric acid and our Mexican needs for sulfur are handled through long term contracts with Rhodia and Pemex-Gas y Petroquimica Basica, or PEMEX, respectively. Purified Phosphoric Acid. The key raw material input for all of our downstream specialty phosphate salt and specialty phosphoric acid operations is PPA. We purchase certain quantities of our PPA supply from third parties to optimize our consumption and net sales, including from PCS with whom we have a long-term supply contract. In 2013, Innophos produced approximately three quarters and purchased approximately one quarter of its total PPA supply. Natural Gas and Electricity. Natural gas and electricity are used to operate our facilities and generate heat and steam for the various manufacturing processes. We typically purchase natural gas and electricity on the North American open market at so-called “spot rates.” From time to time, we will enter into longer term natural gas and electricity supply contracts in an effort to eliminate some of the volatility in our energy costs. Though we did not do so in 2013, in 2012 we did enter into an economic hedge for approximately 75% of our US & Canada natural gas requirements. We also seek to increase the energy efficiencies of our facilities and reduce costs through investments and ongoing continuous improvement projects. Research and Development Our product engineering and development activities are aimed at developing and enhancing products, processes, applications and technologies to strengthen our position in our markets and with our customers. We focus on: • • • • • • developing new or improved application-specific specialty phosphate and other mineral and botanical based specialty ingredients based on our existing product line and identified or anticipated customer needs; creating new phosphate products to be used in new applications or to serve new markets; providing customers with premier technical services as they integrate our ingredients into their products and manufacturing processes; ensuring that our products are manufactured in accordance with our stringent regulatory, health and safety policies and objectives; developing more efficient and lower cost manufacturing processes; and expanding existing, and developing new, relationships with customers to meet their product engineering needs. Our research expenditures were $3.9 million, $3.1 million and $2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Environmental and Regulatory Compliance Certain of our operations involve manufacturing ingredients for use in food, nutritional supplement and pharmaceutical excipient products, and therefore must comply with stringent U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, similar regulatory controls of foreign jurisdictions where we operate, as well as good manufacturing practices and the quality requirements of our customers. In addition, our operations that involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, are subject to extensive and frequently changing environmental regulation by federal, state, and local authorities, as well as regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over our foreign operations that now extend to Canada, Mexico and China. Our operations also expose us to the risk of claims for environmental remediation and restoration or for exposure to hazardous materials. Our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal or modification. Violations of health and safety and environmental laws, regulations, or permits may result in restrictions being imposed on operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages, the rescission of an operating permit, third-party claims for property damage or personal injury, or other costs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Due to changes in health and safety and environmental laws and regulations, the time frames when those laws and regulations might be applied, and developments in environmental control technology, we cannot predict with certainty the amount of capital expenditures to be incurred for environmental purposes. Some environmental laws and regulations impose liability and responsibility on present and former owners, operators or users of facilities, and sites for contamination at such facilities and sites without regard to causation or knowledge of contamination. Many of our sites have an extended history of industrial use. Soil and groundwater contamination have been detected at some of our sites, and additional contamination might occur or be discovered at these sites or other sites in the future (including sites to which we may have sent hazardous waste). We continue to investigate, monitor or cleanup contamination at most of these sites. The potential liability for all these sites will depend on several factors, including the extent of contamination, the method of remediation, future developments and increasingly stringent regulation, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies, the liability of third parties, potential natural resource damage, and insurance coverage. Page 9 of 82 Liabilities for environmental matters are recorded in the accounting period in which our responsibility is established and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Due to the uncertainties associated with environmental investigations and cleanups and the ongoing nature of the investigations and cleanups at our sites, we are unable to predict precisely the nature, cost and timing of our future remedial obligations with respect to our sites and, as a result, our actual environmental costs and liabilities could significantly exceed our accruals. Further information, including the current status of significant environmental matters and the financial impact incurred for the remediation of such environmental matters, is included in Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors”. Intellectual Property We rely on a combination of patent, copyright and trademark laws to protect certain key intellectual aspects of our business. In addition, our pool of proprietary information, consisting of manufacturing know-how, trade secrets and unregistered copyrights relating to the design and operation of our facilities and systems, is considered particularly important and valuable. Accordingly, we protect proprietary information through all legal means practicable. However, monitoring the unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult, and the steps we have taken may not prevent all unauthorized use by others. While we consider our copyrights and trademarks to be important to our business, ultimately our established reputation and the products and service we provide to the end-customer are more important. Insurance In the normal course of business, we are subject to numerous operating risks, including risks associated with environmental, health and safety while manufacturing, developing and supplying products, potential damage to a customer, and the potential for an environmental accident. We currently have in force insurance policies covering property, general liability, excess liability, workers’ compensation/employer’s liability, product liability, product recall, fiduciary and other coverages. We seek to maintain coverages consistent with market practices and required by those with whom we do business. Where appropriate for the protection of our property, we also require others with whom we do business to provide certain coverages for our benefit. We believe that we are appropriately insured for the insurable risks associated with our business. Employees As of December(cid:3)31, 2013, we had 1,427(cid:3)employees, of whom 762 were unionized hourly wage employees. We currently employ both union and non-union employees at most of our facilities. We believe we have a good working relationship with our employees, which has resulted in high productivity and low turnover in key production positions. We have experienced no work stoppages or strikes at any of our unionized facilities since acquiring them in 2004. We are a party to a collective bargaining agreement with the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, Local No.(cid:3)7-765 through January(cid:3)16, 2017 at the Chicago Heights facility; International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No.(cid:3)912 through April(cid:3)21, 2016 at the Nashville facility; the Health Care, Professional, Technical, Office, Warehouse and Mail Order Employees Union, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 743 through June(cid:3)17, 2014 at the Chicago (Waterway) facility; the United Steelworkers, Local No.(cid:3)6304 through April(cid:3)30, 2014 at the Port Maitland, Ontario facility; and the Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Industria Qu(cid:175)mica, Petroqu(cid:175)mica, Carboqu(cid:175)mica, Gases, Similares y Conexos de la Rep(cid:188)blica Mexicana, at the Mexico facilities. The agreement at the Coatzacoalcos, Mexico facility is for an indefinite period, but wages are reviewed every year and the rest of the agreement is subject to negotiation every two years. The current two-year period will expire in June 2014. Page 10 of 82 Executive Officers The following table and biographical material present information about the persons serving as our executive officers: Name Randolph Gress Mark Feuerbach William Farran Iris Alvarado Charles Brodheim Louis Calvarin Joseph Golowski Gail Holler Russell Kemp Michael Lovrich Abraham Shabot Mark Thurston Susan Turner Age 58 54 Position Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Investor Relations, Treasury, Financial 64 43 50 50 52 55 55 60 52 54 60 Planning & Analysis Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Vice President of Purchasing, Logistics & Distribution Vice President and Corporate Controller Vice President, Operations Vice President, Specialty Phosphates Vice President, Human Resources Vice President, Research & Development and Chief Risk Officer Vice President, Planning and Customer Service Vice President, Director General, Innophos Latin America Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Worldwide Business Development Vice President, Quality and Regulatory Biographical Material Randolph Gress is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Innophos. Mr. Gress joined Innophos as Chief Executive Officer and Director at the Company's inception in 2004. Previously, Mr. Gress joined Rhodia in 1997 and held various positions including Global President of Rhodia's Specialty Phosphates business and Vice President and General Manager of the Sulfuric Acid business. Prior to joining Rhodia, Mr. Gress spent fourteen years at FMC Corporation where he worked in various managerial capacities in Strategic Planning, Business, Operations and Supply Chain. From 1977 to 1980, Mr. Gress worked at Ford Motor Company in various capacities within the Plastics, Paint and Vinyl Division. Mr. Gress earned a B.S.E. in Chemical Engineering from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Mr. Gress currently serves on the Board of Directors for Coeur Mining, Inc. Mark Feuerbach is Vice President, Investor Relations, Treasury, Financial Planning & Analysis and is currently serving as Chief Financial Officer of Innophos after having previously served that role from August 2004 through April 2005 and again from June through September 2009. Mr. Feuerbach joined Rhodia in 1989 and was Global Finance Director of Specialty Phosphates from 2000 to 2004, including a two-year assignment in the U.K. immediately following the purchase of the phosphates business of Albright & Wilson. Prior to this assignment, Mr. Feuerbach was the Finance Director of Rhodia’s North American phosphates business from 1997 to 2000 and he previously held various finance positions in a number of Rhodia’s businesses. Prior to joining Rhodia, Mr. Feuerbach held various accounting and finance positions in both manufacturing and service companies. Mr. Feuerbach earned a B.A. in Business Administration/Accounting from Rutgers College and an M.B.A. in Finance/Information Systems from Rutgers Graduate School of Management. William Farran is Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Innophos. Mr. Farran joined Rhodia in 1987 as Environmental Counsel and held various positions in the Rhodia Legal Department, including Senior Operations Counsel and Assistant General Counsel, providing and managing a wide range of legal services to various Rhodia North American enterprises. In addition to his legal responsibilities, Mr. Farran also led the North American Total Quality Management function and served as Director, Public Affairs and Communications. Prior to joining Rhodia, Mr. Farran was Senior Counsel for UGI Corporation, Valley Forge, PA, and an associate with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, PA. Mr. Farran earned his B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania and his J.D. from Case Western Reserve University. He is a member of the bars of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and the Supreme Court of the United States. Iris Alvarado is Vice President of Purchasing, Logistics & Distribution of Innophos. She joined Albright & Wilson in 1996 working in the Logistics Department and she has since held progressive positions in the areas of Purchasing, Logistics and Distribution. Ms. Alvarado was Manager of Purchasing of Raw Materials, MRO, Logistics and Packaging for Rhodia Page 11 of 82 Mexico from 2000 through 2002 and Corporate Purchasing Manager in 2003. After her next positions as Innophos(cid:3244) Supply Chain Director from 2004 to 2008 and Global Director of Strategic Sourcing of Raw Materials & Energy from 2009 to October 2010, Ms. Alvarado was appointed interim Vice President of Supply Chain from November 2010 to January 2012. She studied Political Science from 1991 to 1992 in the Eberhard Karls University of T(cid:190)bingen in Germany. Ms. Alvarado earned a B.B.A degree in International Relations from the University of the Americas-Puebla, Mexico and holds an M.A in Business Administration from Instituto Tecnol(cid:181)gico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey. Charles Brodheim is Vice President and Corporate Controller of Innophos. Mr. Brodheim joined Rhodia in 1988 and held various tax, accounting and business analyst positions within Rhodia. Mr. Brodheim was the North American Finance Director for Specialty Phosphates from 2000-2002. After 2002, Mr. Brodheim was a Finance Director for various Rhodia North American Enterprises, including its Eco-Services enterprise. Mr. Brodheim earned a B.B.A. degree in Finance/Accounting from Temple University and is a certified public accountant. Louis Calvarin is Vice President, Operations of Innophos. Dr. Calvarin joined Rhodia in France in 1986. He has been Director of Manufacturing and Engineering for Specialty Phosphates since January 2004. Prior to that, Dr. Calvarin held the positions of Director of Manufacturing for Specialty Phosphates (U.S.), Mineral Chemicals Industrial Operations Manager for Home, Personal Care and Industrial Ingredients, and Projects Director for Paint, Paper and Construction Materials. Dr. Calvarin earned a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering from the Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines in France and graduated from Ecole Polytechnique in France. Joseph Golowski is Vice President of the Specialty Phosphates Business of Innophos, appointed to that position in April 2010. Joining Rhodia in 1989 in Market Development, Mr. Golowski has since then held progressive roles in Business Development, Sales, Marketing and Management. From 1997 through 2000, Mr. Golowski served as a Global Market Director for Rhodia Rare Earths based in Paris, France. Returning to the U.S., he became the North American Asset Manager for Phosphoric Acid and subsequently the Director of Sales for the Specialty Phosphate Business. This path brought him to be appointed Vice President of Sales in 2006 and to his current role as Vice President for the Specialty Phosphate Business. Mr. Golowski earned a B.S. in Ceramic Engineering from Rutgers University, College of Engineering. Gail Holler is Vice President, Human Resources of Innophos. Ms. Holler joined Innophos in December of 2010 as Senior Director Human Resources and was elected Vice President, Human Resources in May 2011. She has 30 years of experience working in Human Resources for global as well as multi-national organizations in both corporate and operational environments, including pharmaceutical, medical device, biotech, and IT companies. Prior to joining Innophos, Ms. Holler worked for Tata Consultancy Services, a $7 billion corporation headquartered in India from May 2009 to December 2010. Previous to that, she was Vice President Human Resources for LifeCell, a $500 million regenerative medicine (biotech) company located in central New Jersey. She also worked for Sanofi-Aventis (and its legacy organizations) for 14 years, with her last position as Vice President Human Resources for the Global Dermatology Division. Ms. Holler earned her BA in Business Communication from the University of Delaware. Russell Kemp is Vice President, Research & Development and Chief Risk Officer of Innophos. Mr. Kemp joined Rhodia in 1989, first holding several manufacturing management jobs and – from 1998 through 2007 – fulfilling a business management role. Previously, he worked as a process and production engineer at Monsanto. Mr. Kemp earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and an MBA from Southern Illinois University – Edwardsville. Michael Lovrich is Vice President, Planning and Customer Service of Innophos. Mr. Lovrich joined Innophos in August 2007 as Vice President, Supply Chain and served in that capacity until 2012. Prior to joining Innophos, Mr. Lovrich served as Vice President, Supply Chain from 2004 through 2007 for Coach, Inc., the specialty leather and women’s accessories manufacturer. Previous to that, Mr. Lovrich was with Engelhard Corporation where he held various positions in Supply Chain Operations and Information Technology, leading several supply chain transformation initiatives at the business unit and corporate level. Prior to Engelhard, Mr. Lovrich held positions with Fisher Scientific, Thompson Medical and Becton- Dickinson. Mr. Lovrich earned his B.A. in History from William Paterson College and his M.B.A. from New York University Stern School of Business. Mr. Lovrich also holds professional certifications in supply chain and operations management. Abraham Shabot is Vice President and Director General for Innophos Latin America. Mr. Shabot joined Innophos in July 2009. Prior to joining Innophos, he served as Managing Director of Kaltex Fibers, a leading acrylic fiber producer in the Americas, from 2007 to 2009. Before that, he held various positions in Sales and Business Development for Comex, a large Mexican building supplies manufacturer and distributor. In addition, he was Latin American Director for Polyone Corporation, a large publicly held manufacturer and distributor of plastic resin and rubber compounds. He earned a degree in Chemical Engineering from Iberoamericana University in Mexico City. Mark Thurston is Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Worldwide Business Development of Innophos and also leads the management teams for the recently acquired Kelatron, AMT and Triarco businesses. Mr. Thurston joined Rhodia in 1985 Page 12 of 82 working in Fine Organics and has been Vice President of Strategy and Worldwide Business Development since 2009. Previously, he was Vice President of Specialty Chemicals from 2004 to 2008 and Vice President and General Manager of Food Ingredients North America from 2002 to 2004. Prior to that, he worked in various sales and marketing capacities for Rhodia. Mr. Thurston previously worked at RTZ Corp. as an assistant planning and marketing manager and an assistant production manager. Mr. Thurston earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Aston in Birmingham, England. Susan Turner is Vice President, Quality and Regulatory of Innophos. Ms. Turner joined Stauffer Chemical in 1980 and has since held progressive roles in the areas of Engineering, Manufacturing, Maintenance, Project Management, and Human Resources. From 2009 to 2012, Ms. Turner served as Process Integration Lead for the ERP business systems redesign and then assumed leadership of the project post go-live through the stabilization period. From 2005 to 2009, Ms. Turner served as Plant Manager of the Chicago Heights and Waterway manufacturing facilities. Prior to that, her experience included assignment in Mexico and France. Ms. Turner earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Utah State University. Available Information The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including the Company, that file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that the Company files with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company files annual reports, quarterly reports, proxy statements and other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The public may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Innophos also makes available free of charge through its website (www.innophos.com) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and, if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Investing in our company involves a significant degree of risk of varying origins, including from our operations and financial matters. If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Risks Related to Our Business Operations Raw Materials Availability and Pricing Our principal raw materials consist of phosphate rock, sulfur and sulfuric acid, MGA, PPA and energy (principally natural gas and electricity). Our raw materials are purchased under supply contracts that vary from long term multi-year supply arrangements to annual agreements. Pricing within contracts is typically set according to predetermined formulae dependent on price indices or market prices with pricing for some shorter term contracts set by negotiation with reference to market conditions. The prices we pay under these contracts will generally lag the underlying market prices of the raw material. Approximately 25% of our supply of these principal raw materials is bought under fixed annual pricing arrangements. Pricing for our remaining supply of raw materials typically adjusts in line with changes in market prices or with approximately a three month lag to market price changes. As a general matter, we cannot be sure that the annual or other periodic contracts we have in place for our raw materials can be renewed on similar terms to those currently enjoyed. Various market conditions can affect the price and supply of our raw materials. The primary demand for both phosphate rock and sulfur, globally, is for fertilizer production. The costs of these materials are heavily influenced by demand conditions in the fertilizer market and freight costs, which historically have been volatile. Prices for both materials escalated rapidly during 2007 and 2008, declined during 2009, began to increase again through 2011 and subsequently declined again through 2013. Increased raw material pricing may adversely affect our margins if we are not able to offset costs with sales price increases as we explain under “Price Competition” below. We import phosphate rock for our Coatzacoalcos, Mexico site from multiple global suppliers. We are currently capable of successfully processing industrial scale quantities of phosphate rock from five separate suppliers and, for 2014, we expect the majority of our requirements to be met from two of these suppliers. Previously, the Coatzacoalcos facility was supplied exclusively by OCP, S.A., a state-owned mining company in Morocco under a 1992 supply agreement that expired in September 2010. Although the Coatzacoalcos facility has made significant advances in its ability to handle alternative grades of rock without adversely affecting operating efficiency, further investment may be required to realize the full benefits of Page 13 of 82 improved process flexibility. Accordingly, process efficiency issues may arise over longer time periods as the plant processes new sources of rock, necessitating further investment or changes in rock suppliers to maintain and improve our current plant processing capabilities. We cannot be sure that efficiency issues will not arise, or if they do, that our existing or other suppliers would be able to supply sufficient additional quantities or grades to meet our full requirements, which may weaken our ability to maintain our existing levels of operations. Although the diversification of our supply base has reduced our dependence on any one supplier, tight demand conditions overall in the fertilizer market would mean that our purchases could be constrained should any major supplier experience a significant disruption in its ability to supply, for example, as a result of capacity constraints, political unrest, or adverse weather conditions in the areas where that supplier operates. Natural gas prices have experienced significant volatility in the past several years. Wide fluctuations in natural gas prices may result from relatively minor changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty, and other factors, both domestic and foreign, that are beyond our control. In addition, natural gas is often a substitute for petroleum-based energy supplies and natural gas prices are positively correlated with petroleum prices. Future increases in the price of petroleum (resulting from increased demand, political instability or other factors) may result in significant additional increases in the price of natural gas. We typically purchase natural gas at spot market prices for use at our facilities which exposes us to that price volatility, except in those instances where, from time to time, we enter into longer term, fixed-price natural gas contracts. Most of our raw materials are supplied to us by either one or a small number of suppliers. Some of those suppliers rely, in turn, on sole or limited sources of supply for raw materials included in their products. Failure of our suppliers to maintain sufficient capability to meet changes in demand or quality, or to overcome unanticipated interruptions in their own sources of supply due to their supplier’s supplier performance failures or from force majeure conditions, such as disaster, political unrest, may prevent them from continuing to supply raw materials as we require them, or at all. Our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of sole or limited source raw materials or to develop alternative sources on a timely basis if required could result in increased costs, which may be material, in our operations or our inability to properly maintain our existing level of operations. Price Competition We face significant competition in each of our markets. In some markets, our products are subject to price pressure due to factors such as competition from low-cost producers, import competition and regulation, excess industry capacity and consolidation among our customers and competitors. These developments, and particularly future expansions by one or more competitors, could have a negative effect on our pricing abilities. In addition, in the specialty chemicals industry, price competition is also based upon a number of other considerations, including product differentiation and innovation, product quality, technical service, and supply reliability. Thus, new products or technologies developed by competitors may also have an adverse impact on our pricing capability. While we have a number of product quality improvement and product enhancement initiatives underway, we cannot assure that our efforts in maintaining differentiation will be successful. From time to time, we have experienced pricing pressure, particularly from significant customers and often coincident with periods of overcapacity in the markets in which we compete. In the past, we have taken steps to reduce costs, focus on higher margin products and resist possible price reductions by structuring our contracts and developing strong “value-oriented” non-price related customer service relationships. However, price reductions in the past have adversely affected our sales and margins, including the mix between our high margin and low margin products. If we are not able to offset price pressure when it arises through improved operating efficiencies, reduced expenditures, improved product margin mix and other means, we may be subject to those same effects in the future. Innophos has experienced more intense pricing pressures in markets, and for applications, where competing producers, particularly those located in China, have similar product offerings, established supply relationships, and potential cost advantages. Historically, this has occurred most frequently in markets such as South America where Innophos does not have local production capability and for less specialized products such as detergent grade STPP. Chinese phosphate producers generally utilize the “thermal” method, a process more heavily dependent on energy that may be cost advantaged compared to “wet” method producers (such as Innophos) during periods of low energy prices. Both North African and some Chinese producers are integrated back to phosphate rock, which also may provide cost advantages to them depending on the markets in which they choose to compete. If the relative competitiveness of Chinese and North African producers increases significantly, or they are successful in extending their product lines to more specialized product applications, pricing pressure on Innophos could increase significantly. Environmental, Product Regulations and Sustainability Initiative Concerns Our operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and some of our products are ingredients in foods, nutritional supplements or pharmaceutical excipients that are used in finished products consumed or used by humans or animals. As a result, we are subject to extensive and frequently changing environmental and other regulatory requirements and periodic inspection by federal, state, and local authorities, including the Page 14 of 82 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and the FDA, as well as other regulatory authorities and those with jurisdiction over our foreign operations and product markets. Moreover, as we increase operations in other jurisdictions, such as China where a new facility was completed in 2012, we will be subject to additional licensing tests for our facilities and operations and a regulatory environment with which we have little previous experience. Our operations also expose us to the risk of claims for environmental remediation and restoration or for exposure to hazardous materials. Our production facilities require various operating permits that are subject to renewal or modification. Violations of environmental laws, regulations, or permits may result in restrictions being imposed on operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages, the rescission of operating permits, third-party claims for property damage or personal injury, or other costs. Additional laws or regulations focused on phosphate-based products may be implemented in the future. For example, a number of states within the U.S. and Canada countrywide have moved to effectively ban the use of phosphate-based products in consumer automatic dishwashing detergents. The trade association that includes major manufacturers of consumer automatic dishwashing detergents has actively supported these efforts in the U.S. and Canada, with non-phosphate legislation becoming effective in July 2010. In addition, the European Union recently enacted legislation to effectively ban phosphates in consumer detergents with a first phase beginning 2013, and in Australia an industry-led voluntary phosphate ban will take effect in 2014. These trends and related changes in consumer preferences have already reduced our requirements for auto dish markets and we have responded with a shift in our capabilities to serve other food and industrial applications. Furthermore, although phosphates are still permitted for consumer detergent applications in many Latin American countries and other parts of the world, we cannot be sure that similar bans may not be implemented in some or all of these markets in the future. Additional demand restrictions may arise from producers reformulating to reduce or eliminate phosphate content, as was announced in early 2014 by a major Consumer Packaged Goods manufacturer. Additional laws, regulations or distribution policies focused on reduced use of other phosphate-based products could occur in the future. For example, some jurisdictions have increased restrictions or banned the use of polyphosphoric acid in asphalt road construction while others have eased restrictions or are in the process of allowing its use. During 2008, such restrictions were implemented in New York State, but reversed in Nebraska and in 2009 restrictions were reversed in Wyoming and relaxed in Colorado. In 2009, Colorado allowed the use of polyphosphoric acid in asphalt road construction on an exception basis. Since then Nebraska and Colorado have reinstituted the restrictions. In 2012, Georgia approved the use of polyphosphoric acid in asphalt road construction and other states are evaluating its allowance. If restrictions are instituted in multiple jurisdictions or throughout the U.S. and Canada, a significant impact on our business could occur. Changes in composition or permitted-use regulations in domestic or export countries may affect the regulatory status of our finished products and our ability to sell these products into some markets. Such changes may in turn require us to reformulate or establish alternative raw material sourcing, potentially incurring additional cost. If these measures are not successful, the available markets for our products may be limited. Maintaining compliance with health and safety and environmental laws and regulations has resulted in ongoing costs for us. Currently, we are involved in several compliance and remediation efforts and agency inspections concerning health, safety and environmental matters. Some existing environmental laws and regulations impose liability and responsibility on present and former owners, operators or users of facilities and sites for contamination at those locations without regard to causation or knowledge of contamination. Many of our sites have an extended history of industrial use. Soil and groundwater contamination have been detected at some of our sites, and additional contamination might occur or be discovered at these sites or other sites (including sites which we might acquire or to which we may have sent hazardous waste) in the future. We continue to investigate, monitor or clean-up contamination at most of these sites. Due to the uncertainties associated with environmental investigations and clean-ups and the ongoing nature of the investigations and clean-ups at our sites, we cannot predict precisely the nature, cost, and timing of our future remedial obligations with respect to our sites. International Operations We have significant production operations in Mexico and Canada, and in 2012 we completed construction of our blending operation for food ingredients at a new facility in China which became operational in 2013. We continually evaluate business opportunities that may expand our operations to other areas beyond our current operations. We believe that revenue from sales outside the U.S. will continue to account for a material portion of our total revenue for the foreseeable future. There are inherent risks in international operations, the most notable being currency fluctuations and devaluations, economic and business conditions that differ from U.S. cycles, divergent social and political conditions that may become unsettled or even disruptive, communication and translation delays and errors due to cultural and language barriers and less predictable outcomes from differing legal and judicial systems. Until we gain familiarity with the risk environment on an ongoing basis, our risks in those regards are likely to be greatest as we implement our new business startup in China. Among the additional risks potentially affecting our Mexican operations are changes in local economic conditions, currency devaluations, potential Page 15 of 82 disruption from socio-political violence in that country, and difficulty in contract enforcement due to differences in the Mexican legal and regulatory regimes compared to those of the U.S. Risks to our Canadian operations, though generally less than for Mexico, nevertheless include a differing federal and provincial regulatory environment from that in the U.S. and currency fluctuations and devaluations. In the event we establish operations in new regions, our exposures to risks from the noted causes and from other as yet unknown causes may increase. Our overall success as a multinational business depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed in differing economic, social and political conditions. Among other things, we are faced with potential difficulties in building and starting up local facilities, staffing and managing local workforces, and designing and effecting solutions to manage commercial risks posed by local customers and distributors. We may not continue to succeed in developing and implementing policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we do business. These risks are not limited to only those countries where we actually operate facilities, but may extend to areas and regions that supply and service our facilities or are supplied and serviced by them. As a U.S. corporation, we are subject to the regulations imposed by the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, which generally prohibit U.S. companies, their subsidiaries and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business. We sell many of our products in developing countries through sales agents and distributors whose personnel are not subject to our disciplinary procedures. While we and our subsidiaries are committed to conducting business in a legal and ethical manner wherever we operate, and we communicate and seek to monitor compliance with our policies by all who do business with us, we cannot be sure that all our third party distributors or agents remain in full compliance with the FCPA or comparable local regulation at all times. Product Liability Exposure Many of our products are functional or fortification additives used in the food and beverage, consumer product, nutritional supplement and pharmaceutical industries. The sale of these additives and our customers' products that include them involve the risk of product liability and personal injury claims, which may be brought by our customers or end-users of products. While we adhere to stringent quality standards in the course of their production, storage and transportation, our products could be subject to adverse effects from foreign matter such as moisture, dust, odors, insects, mold or other substances, or from excessive temperature variations. Our products may also be susceptible to non-conformance resulting from our raw materials. To mitigate this risk, we conduct extensive diligence and testing protocols regarding our raw material suppliers. Historically, we have not been subject to material product liability claims, and no material claims are outstanding. However, because our products are used in manufacturing a wide variety of our customers' products, including those ingested by humans, and we have concentrated the recent growth of our business in those areas, we cannot be sure we will not be subject to material product liability or recall claims in the future. Production Facility Operating Hazards Our production facilities are subject to hazards associated with the manufacturing, handling, storage, and transportation of chemical materials and products, including failure of pipeline integrity, explosions, fires, inclement weather and natural disasters, terrorist attacks, mechanical failures, unscheduled downtime, transportation or utility interruptions, remedial complications, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances, storage tank leaks and other environmental risks. We have implemented and installed various management systems and engineering controls and procedures at all our production facilities to enhance safety and minimize these risks. We also insure our facilities to protect against a range of risks. However, these potential hazards do exist and could cause personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment, and environmental and natural resource damage, and may result in a suspension of operations (or extended shutdowns) and the imposition of civil or criminal penalties, whose nature, timing, severity and non- insured exposures are unknown. Intellectual Property Rights We rely on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures and agreements, and patent, trademark, copyright, unfair competition, trade secrecy, and other intellectual property laws to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights on a worldwide basis. Nonetheless, we cannot be sure that any pending patent application or trademark application will result in an issued patent or registered trademark, or that any issued or registered patents or trademarks will not be challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. The use of our intellectual property by others could reduce any competitive advantage we have developed or otherwise harm our business. Moreover, we cannot be sure that our property rights can be asserted in all cases, particularly in an international context, or that we can defend ourselves successfully or cost- effectively against the assertion of rights by others. Page 16 of 82 Contingency Planning We operate a number of manufacturing facilities in the US, Canada, China and Mexico, and we coordinate company activities, including our sales, customer service, information technology systems and administrative services and the like, through headquarters operated in those countries. Our sites and those of others who provide services to them are subject to varying risks of disaster and follow on consequences, both manmade and natural, that could degrade or render inoperable one or more of our facilities for an extended period of time. Such disaster related risks and effects are not predictable with certainty and, although they can be mitigated, they cannot be completely prevented. We seek to mitigate our exposures to physical disaster events in a number of ways. For example, where feasible, we design and engineer the configuration of our plants and the associated supply chains to reduce the likelihood and consequences of disasters. We also have adopted certain contingency plans to guide operation in the event of disruption. Furthermore, we maintain insurance for our facilities (and in maintaining our supply chain require insurance to be maintained by others) against casualties, including extended business interruption, and we continually evaluate our risks and develop new and revised contingency plans for dealing with them and policies for avoiding them in the future. Although we have reviewed and analyzed a broad range of risks applicable to our business, the ones that actually affect us may not be those we have concluded most likely to occur. Furthermore, although our reviews have led to more systematic contingency planning, our plans are in varying stages of development and execution, such that they may not be adequate at the time of occurrence for the magnitude of any particular disaster event that befalls us. Certain Financial Risks Contingencies Affecting Dividends After our Common Stock became publicly traded in 2006, our Board of Directors initiated a policy of paying regular quarterly cash dividends, subject to the availability of funds, legal and contractual restrictions and prudent needs of our business. We have maintained that policy and paid dividends continuously since that time, making payments that we believed were prudent and promoted stockholder value. However, we are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are normally dependent upon cash dividends, distributions and other transfers from our subsidiaries, most directly Innophos, Inc., our primary operating subsidiary, and its intermediate parent or parents, to make dividend payments on our Common Stock. The amounts available to us to pay cash dividends are restricted by provisions of Delaware law and historically, and we expect for the future, also by limitations in our debt facilities. As allowed by existing debt instruments, we may incur additional indebtedness that may restrict to an even greater degree, or prohibit, the payment of dividends on stock. We cannot be sure the level of our operations or agreements governing our current or future indebtedness will permit us to adhere to our current dividend policy, increase dividends, or pay any dividends at all, or that continued payment of dividends will remain prudent for our business in the future judgment of our Board of Directors. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. Page 17 of 82 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Our headquarters are located in Cranbury, New Jersey, with manufacturing facilities strategically located throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico and China. We do not own and are not responsible for any closed U.S. or Canadian elemental phosphorus or phosphate production sites. Facility Type Location Owned or Leased Corporate Headquarters / Research & Development Cranbury, NJ Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing / Research & Development / Administrative Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Manufacturing Warehouse Administrative Administrative Administrative / Research & Development Administrative / Research & Development Administrative Coatzacoalcos, Mexico Chicago Heights, IL Nashville, TN Port Maitland, Canada Geismar, LA Ogden, UT North Salt Lake, UT Salt Lake City, UT Green Pond, SC Paterson, NJ Leased Owned Owned Owned Owned Owned Leased Owned Owned Owned Leased Chicago (Waterway), IL Owned Mission Hills, Mexico Taicang City, China Chicago, IL Mexico City, Mexico Mississauga, Canada Ogden, UT Clifton, NJ Sao Paulo, Brazil Leased Leased Owned Leased Leased Owned Leased Leased ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The information set forth in Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES None. Page 18 of 82 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Certain Market Data Our Common Stock has been listed and traded since November 2006 on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “IPHS.” Stock price comparisons: Quarter First Second Third Fourth 2013 Low 46.50 47.17 47.63 46.00 $ Dividends Paid Per Share 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.40 $ $ High 51.85 56.46 58.01 49.71 2012 Low 45.25 47.07 46.60 43.93 $ Dividends Paid Per Share 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.35 $ $ High 55.43 54.68 52.78 56.75 The Company declared a $0.40 per share dividend in the first quarter of 2014. The number of holders of record of our Common Stock at February 11, 2014 was 8,450. Dividends Consistent with the determination our Board of Directors made in December 2006, we continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends. Prior to 2011, the quarterly dividend was $0.17 per share of common stock which increased to $0.25 per share of Common Stock in 2011. Subsequently, the quarterly dividend was increased to $0.27 per share of Common Stock starting with the first quarter of 2012, $0.35 per share in October 2012 and $0.40 per share in October 2013. Subject to action by the Board of Directors management’s present policy is to recommend dividends be continued, reflecting its judgment at the present time that stockholders are better served if we distribute to them, as quarterly dividends payable at the discretion of the Board, a portion of the cash generated by our business in excess of our expected cash needs rather than retaining or using the cash for other purposes. Our expected cash needs include operating expenses and working capital requirements, interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, capital expenditures, costs associated with being a public company, taxes and other costs. If our financial needs change, management’s recommendations concerning dividends may also change. We are not required to pay dividends, and our stockholders will not be guaranteed, or have contractual or other rights, to receive dividends. Our Board of Directors may decide, in its discretion at any time, to decrease or increase the amount of dividends, otherwise modify or repeal the dividend policy or discontinue entirely the payment of dividends. In addition to prudent business considerations, our ability to pay dividends is restricted by the laws of Delaware, our state of incorporation, and may be restricted by agreements governing debt. Since we are a holding company, substantially all assets shown on our consolidated balance sheet are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flow and our ability to pay dividends are largely dependent upon the earnings and cash flows of our subsidiaries and the distribution or other payment of such earnings to us in the form of dividends. Our ability to pay dividends on our Common Stock is limited by restrictions in our indebtedness affecting the ability to pay dividends. See Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. Equity Compensation Plans The following information is provided for our most recently completed fiscal year for certain plans providing compensation in the form of equity securities. Page 19 of 82 Equity Compensation Plan Information Plan category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders Total ______________________ Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) ** Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) 700,525 $ — 700,525 $ $ 26.60 — 26.60 * 1,597,363 — 1,597,363 * Includes in the total 176,930 shares of Common Stock available for future grant and issuance under our 2006 Long Term Equity Incentive Plan. The remaining shares shown in column (c) are attributable to our 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan. ** In column (b), the weighted average exercise price is only applicable to stock options. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities During 2011 the Board of Directors authorized a repurchase program for Company common stock of up to $50 million. Under the program, shares will be repurchased from time to time at management’s discretion, either through open market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or other means and will be funded through existing liquidity and cash from operations. A five year time limit has been set for the expiration of the program as initially structured. The timing of repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will depend upon market conditions and other factors. However, annual repurchase amounts are expected at a minimum to be sufficient to reduce significantly, or eliminate, earnings per share dilution caused by shares issued upon the exercise of stock options and in connection with other equity based compensation plans. Treasury stock is recognized at the cost to reacquire the shares. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $40.93 per share or $6.1 million. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $48.36 per share or $7.3 million. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $47.45 per share or $7.1 million. As of December 31, 2013, there is a balance of $29.5 million remaining under the repurchase program. Page 20 of 82 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table presents selected historical consolidated statements of operations, balance sheet and other data for the periods presented and should only be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts, share amounts or where otherwise noted) Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Statement of operations data: Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative Research and development Total operating expenses Operating income Interest expense, net Foreign exchange losses (gains), net Income before income taxes Provision for income taxes Net income Allocation of net income to common shareholders Per share data: Income (loss) per share: Basic Diluted Cash dividends declared Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic Diluted Other data: Cash flows provided from (used in): Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Capital expenditures Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1) ______________________ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 844,129 685,830 158,299 862,399 684,979 177,420 $ 810,487 $ 605,172 205,315 65,380 2,923 68,303 137,012 5,726 875 130,411 43,889 64,320 3,107 67,427 109,993 5,977 (1,957 ) 70,501 3,928 74,429 83,870 4,426 3,197 76,247 26,741 49,506 105,973 31,783 74,190 $ $ 86,522 $ $ 714,231 556,826 157,405 666,759 470,780 195,979 59,564 2,405 61,969 95,436 28,289 659 66,488 21,333 45,155 $ 67,151 1,938 69,089 126,890 23,313 (769) 104,346 41,202 63,144 49,442 $ 74,150 $ 86,522 $ 45,141 $ 63,141 2.25 2.21 1.45 $ $ $ 3.40 3.30 0.89 $ $ $ 3.99 3.83 $ $ 1.00 $ 2.11 2.02 0.68 $ $ $ 2.97 2.87 0.68 21,933,843 22,345,980 21,795,155 22,475,881 21,694,453 22,578,567 21,421,226 22,359,447 21,258,536 21,968,904 2013 2012 (Dollars in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 $ 91,299 (37,840) (47,519) 33,415 $ 101,405 (104,766 ) (5,066 ) 33,060 $ 46,346 (54,728 ) (20,082 ) 34,195 $ 75,958 (31,192 ) (113,511) 31,192 11.1x 14.1x 17.7x 3.2x 174,100 (19,609) (147,368) 19,609 4.6x Page 21 of 82 (1) For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and one-third of operating rental expenses which management believes is representative of the interest component of rent expense. Balance sheet data: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable Inventories Property, plant & equipment, net Total assets Total debt Total stockholders’ equity 2013 2012 (Dollars in thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2011 2010 2009 $ $ 32,755 88,434 181,467 201,985 745,177 163,009 463,419 $ $ 26,815 94,033 163,606 195,723 736,266 176,000 444,323 $ $ 35,242 104,421 169,728 187,421 687,015 152,000 393,208 $ $ 63,706 74,691 123,182 191,948 626,890 149,000 330,716 $ $ 132,451 56,345 113,636 205,227 662,468 246,000 295,378 Items included in the preceding tables which had a significant impact on results are summarized as follows: 2013 included the acquisition of CMI increasing investing activities by approximately $5.0 million; an after tax benefit of $5.4 million ($7.2 million before tax) for the settlement of the CNA Fresh Water Claims. 2012 included the acquisitions of AMT and Triarco increasing investing activities by approximately $72 million; an after tax benefit of $7.2 million ($7.1 million before tax) for the settlement with Rhodia on their liability for the charges to be paid the CNA for the Fresh Water Claims. 2011 included the acquisition of Kelatron increasing investing activities by approximately $21 million. 2010 included an $11.7 million after tax charge ($20.0 million before tax) for the CNA Fresh Water Claims and a $7.1 million after tax charge ($10.8 million before tax) related to our debt refinancing. 2009 included a $5.0 million after tax charge ($7.0 million before tax) for the settlement of the phosphate rock supplier dispute. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and services and our future results. We based these statements on assumptions that we consider reasonable. Actual results may differ materially from those suggested by our forward-looking statements for various reasons including those discussed in the “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” sections of this report. Background Innophos is a leading international producer of performance-critical and nutritional specialty ingredients, with applications in food, beverage, dietary supplements, pharmaceutical, oral care and industrial end markets. Innophos combines more than a century of experience in specialty phosphate manufacturing with a growing capability in a broad range of other specialty ingredients to supply a product range produced to stringent regulatory manufacturing standards and the quality demanded by customers worldwide. Many of Innophos' products are application-specific compounds engineered to meet customer performance requirements and are often critical to the taste, texture and performance of foods, beverages, pharmaceuticals, oral care products and other applications. For example, Innophos products act as flavor enhancers in beverages, electrolytes in sports drinks, texture additives in cheeses, leavening agents in baked goods, pharmaceutical excipients, cleaning agents in toothpaste and provide a wide range of nutritional fortification solutions for food, beverage and nutritional supplement manufacturers. Page 22 of 82 2013 Overview Our financial performance in 2013 was highlighted by: • Net sales of $844.1 million compared to $862.4 million for 2012, a decrease of $18.3 million mostly attributable to lower fertilizer market demand and selling prices which resulted in a $38.1 million decline for our GTSP & Other business. Specialty Phosphates grew $19.8 million primarily from acquisition benefits that exceeded a 1% decline in core business volumes resulting from first half 2013 production issues in Coatzacoalcos, Mexico and demand in some markets; • Net income of $49.5 million or $2.21 per share (diluted); • Improved phosphoric acid yields each quarter after significant first half maintenance expense in Coatzacoalcos, with fourth quarter performance at 490 basis points higher than the first quarter low point; • Commissioned a new higher grade food and beverage purified phosphoric acid operation in Coatzacoalcos, Mexico to support our US and Canada network and add strength to our product mix in Latin America; • Established new monthly and annual production records on the Coatzacoalcos Specialty Ingredients unit; • Grew export sales out of the US and Canada by 9% compared to 2012; • Completed our fourth acquisition in the high growth nutritional ingredients space with the acquisition of Chelated Minerals International (CMI) in October for $5 million; • Completed the permitting and startup of a blending facility and laboratory in Taicang, China; • Reached settlement on amounts owed for 2005-2008 Mexican water duties resulting in a net reduced liability of $5.4 million; • Net cash provided from operations of $91.3 million which was invested in growth, through capital expenditures and the acquisition of CMI, and returns to stockholders through increased dividends and share repurchases; • Capital expenditures of $33.4 million with the focus on manufacturing investments consisting of: • • • restoring Coatzacoalcos capacity, reliability and efficiency after premature equipment failures in the first half; capacity enhancements for US / Canada and Mexico Specialty Ingredients facilities to support growth objectives; enhancing Mexico's capability to process multiple grades of rock consistent with the Company's supply chain diversification strategy; • Increased the quarterly dividend rate by 14% to $0.40/share for the fourth quarter payment leading to total year dividends of $1.45/share paid on the Common Stock in 2013, an increase of 27% over the $1.14/share paid in 2012; and • 150,000 shares of common stock repurchased for $7.1 million; Recent Trends and Outlook Specialty Phosphates overall volume was flat in the fourth quarter 2013 compared to the prior year, with a 3% benefit from acquisitions offset by a 3% decline in the core business primarily resulting from Mexico’s increased intercompany sales to replenish US inventories. Specialty Ingredients volumes were up 4%, but declines in lower margin STPP and PPA sales from Mexico led to the overall 3% decline in core business volumes. Export sales out of the US were up 12% year-over-year with strong growth recorded in Asia Pacific. At this time, the company is confirming it’s previously announced 2014 outlook of 3-5% volume growth for Specialty Phosphates. This is based on the improved operations at our Coatzacoalcos facility, low double-digit growth expectations for our nutrition business and expected asphalt market demand recovery which detracted 90 basis points from our 2013 volume growth rates. Specialty Phosphates operating income margins were 15% for the fourth quarter 2013, slightly above expectations, due to higher average selling prices achieved. We still expect to deliver 14-15% operating income margins for 2014. The first quarter is expected to be the lowest margin quarter of the year, at approximately 100 basis points below the full year average, Page 23 of 82 due to some higher cost PPA in inventory and some unexpected fourth quarter purchase price variances from our Merchant Grade Acid supplier for phosphate rock consumption variances at their facility which have since been rectified. Market prices for the key raw materials of phosphate rock and sulfur both declined approximately 20% in the fourth quarter compared to the third quarter 2013, consistent with a drop in market fertilizer prices during that period. Fertilizer prices have since rebounded by approximately 20% when comparing the end of January 2014 prices to mid-December 2013. Raw material prices are therefore expected to rebound as well in the first quarter 2014, with sulfur costs increasing by nearly 50%, putting those costs somewhere between second and third quarter 2013 levels, and phosphate rock likely to increase as well. Although we have seen some resistance on selling prices in recent quarters, we have been able to maintain fairly stable pricing overall, and are prepared to respond with selling price increases should raw material costs increase. GTSP & Other profitability remained at a $4 million operating loss for the fourth quarter 2013 due to weak market demand and selling prices that reached lows last recorded in early 2010. As usual, the outlook for GTSP & Other is not as clear as with Specialty Phosphates, but an indicated operating loss of between $2-3 million represents our best view for the first quarter 2014, based on business that has already transacted. We expect break-even operating income for the second quarter 2014 based on February market price indications and the expectation that market prices will continue to increase for the remainder of the first quarter. Net debt (total long-term debt (including any current portion) less cash and cash equivalents) increased sequentially by $4 million in the fourth quarter 2013 to $130 million as the Company repurchased 150,000 shares for $7.1 million. Results of Operations The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s operations and their percentages of total revenue for the periods indicated (dollars in millions): Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Operating expenses: 2013 $ Amount 844.1 685.8 158.3 Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 % 100.0 81.2 18.8 Amount 862.4 685.0 177.4 % 100.0 79.4 20.6 Amount 810.5 605.2 205.3 Selling, general and administrative Research & development Income from operations Interest expense, net Foreign exchange losses (gains), net Other income Provision for income taxes Net income 70.5 3.9 83.9 4.4 3.3 — 26.7 49.5 $ 8.4 0.5 9.9 0.5 0.4 — 3.2 5.9 $ 64.3 3.1 110.0 6.0 (2.0) — 31.8 74.2 7.5 0.4 12.8 0.7 (0.2) — 3.7 8.6 65.4 2.9 137.0 5.7 0.9 — 43.9 86.5 % 100.0 74.7 25.3 8.1 0.4 16.9 0.7 0.1 — 5.4 10.7 Year Ended December 31, 2013 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Net Sales Net sales represent the selling price of the products, net of any customer-related rebates, plus freight and any other items invoiced to customers. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $844.1 million, a decrease of $18.3 million, or 2.1%, as compared to $862.4 million for the same period in 2012. Selling price had a negative effect on revenue of 2.0% or $17.0 million and volumes decreased 0.1% or $1.3 million. GTSP & Other sales had 25.3% lower volumes and 11.1% lower prices due to soft fertilizer market conditions and market prices that reached lows last recorded in early 2010. Specialty Phosphates volumes were 3.3% higher with a 4.3% benefit from acquisitions and a 1.0% decline in our core business primarily resulting from first half 2013 operating issues in Mexico. Specialty Phosphates average selling prices were 0.7% lower primarily due to unfavorable sales mix in the US/Canada business and a price reset on a long-term customer contract in Mexico. Page 24 of 82 The Company calculates pure selling price dollar variances as the selling price for the current year to date period minus the selling price for the prior year to date period, and then multiplies the resulting selling price difference by the prior year to date period volume. Volume variance is calculated as the total sales variance minus the selling price variance and refers to the revenue effect of changes in tons sold at the relative prices applicable to the variation in tons, otherwise known as volume/mix. The following table illustrates for the year ended December 31, 2013 the percentage changes in net sales by reportable segment compared with the prior year, including the effect of price and volume/mix changes upon revenue: Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other Total Price Volume/Mix Total (0.3 )% (1.9 )% (0.7 )% (11.1 )% (2.0 )% 6.9 % (7.6 )% 3.3 % (25.3 )% (0.1 )% 6.6% (9.5)% 2.6% (36.4)% (2.1)% Note: Included within Specialty Phosphates US & Canada and Total Specialty Phosphates volume/mix variances were benefits of 5.8% and 4.4%, respectively, from the AMT business acquired in the third quarter of 2012 and the Triarco business acquired in December 2012. The following table illustrates for the year ended December 31, 2013 the percentage changes for net sales by Specialty Phosphates product lines compared with the prior year, including the effect of price and volume/mix changes: Specialty Ingredients Food & Technical Grade PPA STPP & Detergent Grade PPA Price Volume/Mix Total (1.1 )% 0.2 % (0.2 )% 9.2 % (4.1 )% (17.2)% 8.1% (3.9)% (17.4)% Note: Included within Specialty Ingredients volume/mix was a 6.5% benefit from the AMT business acquired in the third quarter of 2012 and the Triarco business acquired in December 2012. Gross Profit Gross profit represents net sales less cost of goods sold. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $158.3 million, a decrease of $19.1 million, or 10.8%, as compared to $177.4 million for the same period in 2012. Gross profit percentage decreased to 18.8% for the year ended December 31, 2013 versus 20.6% for the same period in 2012. Gross profit in 2013 was unfavorably affected by $17.0 million for lower selling prices, $4.4 million higher fixed costs mainly from higher maintenance expense, a $1.6 million lower of cost or market reserve recorded in the current period for GTSP, $1.2 million unfavorable exchange rate mostly from Mexican peso based costs, and $15.4 million in elevated cost of goods sold for the first half 2013, of which $7.9 million related to Mexico manufacturing issues, $2.1 million related to a revision of estimates for phosphate rock inventories in Mexico, $2.3 million related to an out of period adjustment related to a long term supply agreement, $2.4 million related to demurrage on raw material purchases and other inventory related costs, and $0.7 million related to acquisition related fair value adjustments. The $39.6 million total of unfavorable effects were partially offset by $7.2 million margin benefit from acquisitions, $9.2 million for lower depreciation in our core business as the assets acquired with the creation of Innophos are nearing the end of their useful lives, $0.6 million higher sales volumes, $0.5 million lower raw material costs, and $2.4 million of expense in the second quarter 2012 for adjustments made to cost of goods sold, including amounts for prior periods. Included in 2012 was $0.6 million for acquisition related fair value adjustments. Both periods included a benefit of approximately $7 million as we made progress in reducing the amounts required to be paid to settle historical water duty claims by the Mexican authorities. Operating Expenses and Research and Development Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $74.4 million, an increase of $7.0 million, or 10.4%, as compared to $67.4 million for 2012. The increase was primarily due to $4.7 million increase from the acquired businesses, a $2.7 million increase in focus on quality, research & development and business improvement programs and a $0.4 million net decrease in all other costs. Operating Income Page 25 of 82 Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $83.9 million, a decrease of $26.1 million, or 23.7%, as compared to $110.0 million for the same period in 2012. Operating income percentages decreased to 9.9% for 2013 from 12.8% for 2012. Interest Expense, net Net interest expense, including deferred financing amortization expense, for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $4.4 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 26.7% as compared to $6.0 million for the same period in 2012. The $1.4 million decrease was mainly due to $1.0 million interest income received on Mexican income tax refunds and $1.4 million lower interest expense on our term loan partially offset by $0.9 million interest expense for income tax audits in the US and $0.3 million increased interest expense on our revolving line of credit. There was $0.3 million accelerated deferred financing expense from the refinancing of our credit facility in the fourth quarter 2012. Foreign Exchange Foreign exchange for the year ended December 31, 2013 was a loss of $3.3 million as compared to a gain of $2.0 million for 2012, primarily due to weakening of the peso against the U.S. Dollar, combined with higher monetary asset positions, in the 2013 period, versus a strengthening of the peso against the U.S. Dollar in the 2012 period. The U.S. Dollar is the functional currency of our Mexican and Canadian operations. Consequently, foreign exchange gain or loss is recorded on remeasurement of non-U.S. dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities. Such gains and losses fluctuate from period to period as the foreign currencies strengthen or weaken against the U.S. dollar and the amount of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities increases or decreases. Provision for Income Taxes The income tax rate was 35% for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to 30% for the same period in 2012. The variance in the income tax rate is primarily due to the non-taxable indemnification from the Rhodia settlement related to the Mexican CNA Water Tax Claims which lowered the income tax rate 3% and the reversal of valuation allowances on certain state net operating loss carry-forwards which lowered the income tax rate 2%, both occurring in 2012. Net Income Net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $49.5 million, a decrease of $24.7 million as compared to $74.2 million for the same period in 2012, due to the factors described above. Year Ended December 31, 2012 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011 Net Sales Net sales represent the selling price of the products, net of any customer-related rebates, plus freight and any other items invoiced to customers. Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $862.4 million, an increase of $51.9 million, or 6.4%, as compared to $810.5 million for the same period in 2011. Selling price increases had a positive effect on revenue of 2.9% or $23.5 million with Specialty Phosphates up 5.1% on positive trends in all product lines, partially offset by lower pricing in GTSP & Other with fertilizer market prices well below 2011 levels. Volumes increased 3.5% or $28.4 million due to the effects of acquisitions on Specialty Phosphates and higher fertilizer sales. The Company calculates pure selling price dollar variances as the selling price for the current year to date period minus the selling price for the prior year to date period, and then multiplies the resulting selling price difference by the prior year to date period volume. Volume variance is calculated as the total sales variance minus the selling price variance and refers to the revenue effect of changes in tons sold at the relative prices applicable to the variation in tons, otherwise known as volume/mix. The following table illustrates for the year ended December 31, 2012 the percentage changes in net sales by reportable segment compared with the prior year, including the effect of price and volume/mix changes upon revenue: Page 26 of 82 Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other Total Price Volume/Mix Total 4.8 % 6.1 % 5.1 % (13.2 )% 2.9 % 3.6 % (5.3 )% 1.3 % 19.5 % 3.5 % 8.4% 0.8% 6.4% 6.3% 6.4% Note: Included within Specialty Phosphates US & Canada and Total Specialty Phosphates volume/mix variances were benefits of 3.6% and 2.7%, respectively, from the Kelatron business acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the AMT business acquired in the third quarter of 2012. The following table illustrates for the year ended December 31, 2012 the percentage changes for net sales by Specialty Phosphates product lines compared with the prior year, including the effect of price and volume/mix changes: Specialty Ingredients Food & Technical Grade PPA STPP & Detergent Grade PPA Price Volume/Mix Total 4.8 % 6.4 % 4.8 % 1.0 % 7.2 % (5.4 )% 5.8% 13.6% (0.6)% Note: Included within Specialty Ingredients volume/mix was a 3.9% benefit from the Kelatron business acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the AMT business acquired in the third quarter of 2012. Gross Profit Gross profit represents net sales less cost of goods sold. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $177.4 million, a decrease of $27.9 million, or 13.6%, as compared to $205.3 million for the same period in 2011. Gross profit percentage decreased to 20.6% for the year ended December 31, 2012 versus 25.3% for the same period in 2011. Gross profit was unfavorably affected by higher raw material costs slightly offset by the benefit from acquisitions which had a combined unfavorable impact of $57.5 million. The increase in raw material costs related primarily to inflation in market raw material prices experienced in 2011 and in response to which price increases were achieved in earlier time periods but with the full effect of raw material increases only evident in cost of goods sold from the second quarter of 2012. There was a $0.5 million unfavorable impact for a planned maintenance outage at our Geismar facility, and there was $2.4 million of out of period cost in Mexico. Gross profit was favorably affected $23.5 million for higher selling prices, $7.1 million due to the recording of a settlement with Rhodia on their liability for the charges to be paid to the Mexican water authority (CNA), $2.6 million favorable exchange rate impact mostly from Mexican peso based costs, and $3.3 million lower depreciation. Included in 2012 was $0.6 million for acquisition related fair value adjustments and in 2011 there was $3.4 million income for updates to the provision for the Mexican CNA Water Tax Claims. Operating Expenses and Research and Development Operating expenses consist primarily of selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses. Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $67.4 million, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 1.3%, as compared to $68.3 million for 2011. The decrease was due to $4.3 million lower non-cash stock compensation, $1.1 million lower short term incentive accruals, and a $0.4 million decrease in all other costs partially offset by $2.9 million increase for the Kelatron and AMT businesses and $2.0 million higher depreciation for the ERP system that was put into service in the third quarter of 2011. Operating Income Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $110.0 million, a decrease of $27.0 million, or 19.7%, as compared to $137.0 million for the same period in 2011. Operating income percentages decreased to 12.8% for 2012 from 16.9% for 2011. Interest Expense, net Net interest expense, including deferred financing amortization expense, for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $6.0 million, an increase of $0.3 million, or 5.3% as compared to $5.7 million for the same period in 2011. The $0.3 million increase was due to accelerated deferred financing from the refinancing of our credit facility in the fourth quarter 2012. Page 27 of 82 Foreign Exchange Foreign exchange gain for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $2.0 million as compared to a loss of $0.9 million for 2011. The U.S. Dollar is the functional currency of our Mexican and Canadian operations. Consequently, foreign exchange gain or loss is recorded on remeasurement of non-U.S. dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities. Such gains and losses fluctuate from period to period as the foreign currencies strengthen or weaken against the U.S. dollar and the amount of non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities increases or decreases. Provision for Income Taxes The income tax rate was 30% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 34% for the same period in 2011. The variance in the income tax rate is primarily due to the non-taxable indemnification from the Rhodia settlement related to the Mexican CNA Water Tax Claims which lowered the income tax rate 3%, the reversal of valuation allowances on certain state net operating loss carry-forwards which lowered the income tax rate 2%, partially offset by increases in tax contingency reserves which increased the income tax rate 1%. Net Income Net income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $74.2 million, a decrease of $12.3 million as compared to $86.5 million for the same period in 2011, due to the factors described above. Page 28 of 82 Segment Reporting The Company reports its core Specialty Phosphates business separately from GTSP & Other. Specialty Phosphates consists of the products lines Specialty Ingredients, Food & Technical Grade PPA and STPP & Detergent Grade PPA. Kelatron, AMT, Triarco and CMI are included in the Specialty Phosphates US & Canada segment and in the Specialty Ingredients product line. GTSP & Other includes fertilizer co-product GTSP and other non-Specialty Phosphate products. The primary performance indicators for the chief operating decision maker are sales and operating income. The following table sets forth the historical results of these indicators by segment: Segment Net Sales Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other Total Net Sales % Growth Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other Total Segment Operating Income Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other (a) (b) (c) Total Segment Operating Income % of net sales Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other (a) (b) (c) Total Depreciation and amortization expense Specialty Phosphates US & Canada Specialty Phosphates Mexico Total Specialty Phosphates GTSP & Other Total 2013 2012 2011 $ $ 607,578 169,851 777,429 66,700 844,129 $ $ 569,816 187,743 757,559 104,840 862,399 $ $ 525,662 186,211 711,873 98,614 810,487 6.6 % (9.5 )% 2.6 % (36.4)% (2.1 )% 8.4 % 0.8 % 6.4 % 6.3 % 6.4 % $ $ $ $ $ 76,802 11,677 88,479 (4,609) 83,870 $ $ 86,002 21,913 107,915 2,078 109,993 $ $ 94,055 21,948 116,003 21,009 137,012 12.6 % 6.9 % 11.4 % (6.9 )% 9.9 % 15.1 % 11.7 % 14.2 % 2.0 % 12.8 % 17.9% 11.8% 16.3% 21.3% 16.9% 26,537 7,200 33,737 1,724 35,461 $ $ 23,214 14,578 37,792 4,542 42,334 $ $ 19,808 18,050 37,858 5,818 43,676 (a) (b) (c) The year ended December 31, 2013, includes a $7.2 million benefit to earnings for the settlement of the Mexican CNA Water Tax Claims and a $2.3 million charge to earnings for out of period costs in the US. The year ended December 31, 2012, includes a $7.1 million benefit to earnings primarily for the settlement with Rhodia on their liability for the charges to be paid the CNA for the CNA Fresh Water Claims and a $2.4 million charge to earnings for out of period costs in Mexico. The year ended December 31, 2011, includes a $3.4 million benefit to earnings related to updates to the provision for the CNA Fresh Water Claims. Segment Net Sales: Page 29 of 82 Specialty Phosphates US & Canada net sales increased 6.6% for the year ended December 31, 2013 when compared with the same period in 2012. Volumes increased 6.9% due to a benefit of 5.8% from the AMT and Triarco acquisitions and 1.1% growth in the core business, with actual volumes shipped up 3.1% but mix down 2.0%. The unfavorable mix primarily occurred in our INNOVALT® product line for asphalt markets that were significantly affected by low government spending and a number of weather related events. Selling price decreased 0.3% primarily due to sales mix. In 2012 net sales increased 8.4% for the year ended December 31, 2012 when compared with the same period in 2011. Selling price increased 4.8% primarily in Specialty Ingredients and Food & Technical Grade PPA. Volumes increased 3.6% due entirely to the Kelatron and AMT acquisitions as market demand for the base business was flat to slightly negative. Specialty Phosphates Mexico net sales decreased 9.5% for the year ended December 31, 2013 when compared with the same period in 2012. Volumes decreased 7.6% as the business experienced operating issues from premature equipment failure in the first half of 2013 which limited production and therefore sales. Selling prices decreased 1.9% primarily from a price reset upon the renewal of a long term contract. In 2012 net sales increased 0.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012 when compared with the same period in 2011. Selling prices increased 6.1% with increases in all product lines. Volumes decreased 5.3% driven by lower market demand that was partially offset by our increased focus on, and broader offering of, Food Grade PPA. GTSP & Other net sales decreased 36.4% for the year ended December 31, 2013 when compared with the same period in 2012. Volumes decreased 25.3% and selling prices decreased 11.1% due to weak fertilizer market demand which resulted in a sharp decline in 2013 market selling prices to levels last recorded in early 2010. In 2012 net sales increased 6.3% for the year ended December 31, 2012 when compared with the same period in 2011 with 19.5% higher volume partially offset by 13.2% lower selling prices. Segment Operating Income Percentage of Net Sales: The 250 basis point decrease in Specialty Phosphates US & Canada for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012 is primarily due to increased costs of goods sold in 2013 compared to an inventory lag benefit in the first quarter 2012 which decreased margins by 220 basis points, elevated cost of goods sold in the first quarter 2013 for revisions in inventory accounting estimates, an out of period adjustment related to a long term supply agreement, demurrage on raw material purchases and acquisition accounting expenses which decreased margins by 100 basis points, and lower selling prices which decreased margins by 30 basis points. Lower fixed costs in the core business increased margins by 50 basis points and higher volumes increased margins by 50 basis points. The 280 basis point decrease in Specialty Phosphates US & Canada for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011 is mainly due to increases in raw material costs and a maintenance outage in the current year which combined for a 660 basis point decrease in margins. Partially offsetting was increased selling prices which increased margins by 380 basis points. The 480 basis point decrease in Specialty Phosphates Mexico for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012 is primarily due to higher cost of goods sold for first half 2013 manufacturing issues and a revision of estimates for phosphate rock inventories which decreased margins by 400 basis points, lower selling prices which decreased margins by 170 basis points, lower sales volume which decreased margins by 20 basis points, increased fixed costs which decreased margins by 630 basis points, and increased turnaround cost at our Coatzacoalcos manufacturing facility decreased margins by 20 basis points. Lower raw material costs increased margins by 370 basis points and lower depreciation increased margins by 390 basis points. The 10 basis point decrease in Specialty Phosphates Mexico for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011 is mainly due to higher phosphate rock and sulfur raw material costs partially offset by lower depreciation and lower operating expenses which combined for a 510 basis point decrease in margins. Increased selling prices increased margins by 500 basis points. The 890 basis point decrease in GTSP & Other for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared with the same period in 2012 is primarily due to lower selling prices which decreased margin by 1,220 basis points, a lower of cost or market reserve which decreased margins by 150 basis points, lower sales volumes which decreased margins by 340 basis points, and increased turnaround cost at our Coatzacoalcos manufacturing facility decreased margins by 20 basis points. Lower raw material costs, mainly from lower rock and sulfur market prices, increased margins by 520 basis points, lower depreciation added 270 basis points, and lower fixed costs increased margins by 50 basis points. The 1,930 basis point decrease in GTSP & Other for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared with the same period in 2011 is primarily due to lower selling prices which decreased margins by 1,190 basis points. Higher raw material costs which exceeded lower depreciation contributed an 850 basis point decrease in margins. The net effect of the 2012 versus 2011 benefit of $3.7 million for the settlement with Rhodia on their liability for the charges to be paid to the CNA increased margins by 380 basis points. Out of period costs in the 2012 period decreased margins by 270 basis points. Page 30 of 82 Liquidity and Capital Resources The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s cash flows for the periods indicated. (Dollars in millions) Operating Activities Investing Activities Financing Activities Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2013 $ $ 91.3 (37.8) (47.5) $ 101.4 (104.7) (5.1) 46.3 (54.7) (20.1) Year Ended December 31, 2013 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2012 Net cash provided by operating activities was $91.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $101.4 million for 2012, a decrease of $10.1 million. The decrease in operating activities cash resulted primarily from unfavorable changes of $24.7 million in net income, as described earlier, and $6.9 million lower depreciation, mostly offset by favorable changes of $18.8 million in working capital, $1.4 million in other long term assets and liabilities and $1.3 million in non-cash adjustments to income. The favorable change in working capital is derived from it being a source of cash of $4.9 million in 2013 compared to a use of cash of $14.7 million in 2012, an increase in cash of $19.6 million. Collections improved on the backlog of value added tax, or VAT, refunds due the Company from the Mexican government; however, this was offset by an inventory build due to increased requirements in Mexico to support improved production performance. Accounts receivable was a $5.9 million source of cash in 2013 compared to a $13.0 million source of cash in 2012, and remained at a consistent trend as a percent of quarterly sales, when adjusted for GTSP open accounts receivable of $1.3 million, $1.0 million, $1.6 million, $15.3 million and $4.3 million as of December 31, 2013, September 30, 2013, June 30, 2013, March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. In October 2013, our Mexican subsidiary received their 2012 income tax refund of approximately $8.7 million. Total inventories increased $18.4 million from December 2012 levels resulting in days of inventory on hand increasing to 95 days. The following chart shows its historical performance: Inventory Days on Hand 2013 2012 2011 95 86 102 Net cash used for investing activities was $37.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $104.7 million for 2012, a decrease in the use of cash of $66.9 million which was mainly due to the acquisitions of CMI in 2013 when compared with the acquisitions of AMT and Triarco in 2012. Capital spending was $0.4 million higher than 2012. This is mainly explained by higher capital spending at our Coatzacoalcos, Mexico facility partially offset by decreased spending at our China blending facility. In July 2012, Innophos, Inc. purchased for cash 100% of the equity of AMT Labs, Inc. and an affiliated real estate company holding all AMT real property, including unused land and buildings to support future expansion. The combined purchase price was $26.9 million, with $19.4 million being allocated to the AMT purchase and $7.5 million being allocated to the real estate entity. The price was funded from our revolving line of credit as well as cash from operations. In December 2012, Innophos, Inc. purchased the assets of Triarco Industries, Inc. for $44.8 million in cash and $1.0 million in shares of Innophos Holdings, Inc. common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price was financed by borrowings under the company's senior credit facility. The acquisition includes potential for contingent incentive compensation upon success in delivering growth objectives over the next two years. The Company currently estimates the contingent incentive compensation to be zero. In October 2013, Innophos purchased all of the assets of Chelated Minerals International, Inc., (CMI), for $5 million in cash. CMI, a privately held company based in Salt Lake City, Utah, has significant knowhow in the manufacture and science of chelated minerals supplied to the human nutrition market. Innophos currently estimates that full exploration costs to a proven reserves standard for its Baja California mining concessions could require expenditures of $10 to $15 million over a period, currently estimated at three to five years, inclusive of expenditures to date. This estimate includes mineral rights payments, taxes, mineral resource measurement, beneficiation Page 31 of 82 process design and completion of feasibility studies. Full expenditures would only occur if interim milestone goals were successfully attained. Combined 2010 through 2013 expenditures on the exploration of the Baja California Sur concession deposits were approximately $3.8 million, and management currently expects to spend an additional $1-2 million in 2014 on evaluations of its Santo Domingo concession. Innophos intends to seek one or more partners for these efforts, but anticipates no difficulties in completing the exploration phase without a partnership. Net cash from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2013, was a use of $47.5 million, compared to a use of $5.1 million in 2012, a decrease in cash of $42.4 million. This was mainly due to a $37.0 million decrease in net borrowing activity, $7.0 million increased dividend payments, and $2.3 million lower excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options, partially offset by $1.1 million increased stock option exercises and $1.5 million deferred financing cost from the refinancing of our credit agreement in 2012. On February 27, 2012 the Company's Board of Directors declared an increase to its dividend from $0.25 per share to $0.27 per share to holders of record on April 16, 2012. On October 26, 2012 the Company's Board of Directors declared an increase to its dividend from $0.27 per share to $0.35 per share to holders of record on November 16, 2012. On October 25, 2013 the Company's Board of Directors declared an increase to its dividend from $0.35 per share to $0.40 per share to holders of record on November 15, 2013. In August 2011, the Company announced a share repurchase program for Company common stock of up to $50 million. Under the program, shares will be repurchased from time to time at management's discretion, either through open market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or other means and will be funded through existing liquidity and cash from operations. A five year time limit has been set for the expiration of the program as initially structured. The timing of repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will depend upon market conditions and other factors. However, annual repurchase amounts are expected at a minimum to be sufficient to reduce significantly, or eliminate, earnings per share dilution caused by shares issued upon the exercise of stock options and in connection with other equity based compensation plans. Treasury stock is recognized at the cost to reacquire the shares. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $40.93 per share or $6.1 million. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $48.36 per share or $7.3 million. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $47.45 per share or $7.1 million. As of December 31, 2013, there is a balance of $29.5 million remaining under the repurchase program. Year Ended December 31, 2012 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011 Net cash provided by operating activities was $101.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to $46.3 million for 2011, an increase of $55.1 million. The increase in operating activities cash resulted primarily from favorable changes of $75.9 million in working capital and $1.8 million in other long term assets and liabilities partially offset by unfavorable changes of $10.3 million in non-cash adjustments to income and $12.3 million in net income as described earlier. The change in working capital is a use of cash of $14.6 million in 2012 compared to a use in 2011 of $90.5 million, a change in cash of $75.9 million. The change in working capital is mainly due to focused efforts to reduce accounts receivable and inventory levels in 2012 after experiencing increased levels in 2011, partially offset by higher tax receivable balances for our Mexico entities and reduced current liabilities resulting from the payment of Mexican water duties for all years except the 2005-2008 disputed period. The higher creditable tax balances are due to required prepayments of income taxes and the backlog of value added tax, or VAT, refunds due the Company from the Mexican government. Total inventories decreased $12.2 million from December 2011 levels resulting in days of inventory on hand decreasing to 86 days. The following chart shows its historical performance: Inventory Days on Hand 2012 2011 2010 86 102 84 Net cash used for investing activities was $104.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $54.7 million for 2011, an increase in the use of cash of $50.1 million which was mainly due to the acquisitions of AMT and Triarco in 2012 compared with the Kelatron acquisition in 2011. Capital spending was $1.1 million lower than 2011. Lower capital spending on the company's ERP project and expansion project at Nashville, TN was mostly offset by increased project spending at the Coatzacoalcos Mexico plant and the China blending facility. On July 17, 2012, Innophos, Inc. purchased for cash 100% of the equity of AMT Labs, Inc. and an affiliated real estate company holding all AMT real property, including unused land and buildings to support future expansion. The combined Page 32 of 82 purchase price was $26.9 million, with $19.4 million being allocated to the AMT purchase and $7.5 million being allocated to the real estate entity. The price was funded from our revolving line of credit as well as cash from operations. On December 31, 2012 Innophos, Inc. purchased the assets of Triarco Industries, Inc. for $44.8 million in cash and $1.0 million in shares of Innophos Holdings, Inc. common stock. The cash portion of the purchase price was financed by borrowings under the company's senior credit facility. The acquisition includes potential for contingent incentive compensation upon success in delivering growth objectives over the next two years. Innophos currently estimates that full exploration costs to a proven reserves standard for its Baja California mining concessions could require expenditures of $10 to $15 million over a period, currently estimated at three to five years, inclusive of expenditures to date. This estimate includes mineral rights payments, taxes, mineral resource measurement, beneficiation process design and completion of feasibility studies. Full expenditures would only occur if interim milestone goals were successfully attained. Combined 2010 through 2012 expenditures on the exploration of the Baja California Sur concession deposits were approximately $3.1 million, and management currently expects to spend an additional $1-2 million in 2013 above the previous annual trend rate to accelerate evaluations of its Santo Domingo concession. Innophos intends to seek one or more partners for these efforts, but anticipates no difficulties in completing the exploration phase without a partnership. Net cash from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012, was a use of $5.1 million, compared to a use of $20.1 million in 2011, a decrease in the use of cash of $15.0 million. This was mainly due to $21.0 million increased borrowings partially offset by $4.9 million increased dividend payments and $1.5 million deferred financing cost from the refinancing of our credit agreement. On February 27, 2012 the Company's Board of Directors declared an increase to its dividend from $0.25 per share to $0.27 per share to holders of record on April 16, 2012. On October 26, 2012 the Company's Board of Directors declared an increase to its dividend from $0.27 per share to $0.35 per share to holders of record on November 16, 2012. In August 2011, the Company announced a share repurchase program for Company common stock of up to $50 million. Under the program, shares will be repurchased from time to time at management's discretion, either through open market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or other means and will be funded through existing liquidity and cash from operations. A five year time limit has been set for the expiration of the program as initially structured. The timing of repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will depend upon market conditions and other factors. However, annual repurchase amounts are expected at a minimum to be sufficient to reduce significantly, or eliminate, earnings per share dilution caused by shares issued upon the exercise of stock options and in connection with other equity based compensation plans. During the third quarter, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $40.93 per share or a total of $6.1 million. During the third quarter of 2012, the Company repurchased 150,000 shares of its common stock on the open market at an average price of $48.36 per share or $7.3 million. Indebtedness Total debt was $163.0 million as of December 31, 2013. Short term and long term debt net of cash was $130.2 million as of December 31, 2013, a decrease of $19.0 million, or 12.7% from December 31, 2012. In August, 2010, Innophos entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a group of lenders (collectively, the “Lenders”). This agreement was amended and restated on December 21, 2012 increasing the Company's borrowing capacity, reducing interest rates and extending the maturity to December 21, 2017. The Credit Agreement provides Innophos with a term loan of $100.0 million and a revolving line of credit from the Lenders of up to $225.0 million, including a $20.0 million letter of credit sub-facility, all maturing on December 21, 2017. Prepayments of term loan are required at the rate of 1% of original principal amount per quarter beginning on March 31, 2013. Refer to Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. Simultaneously with initiating the new senior credit facility, Innophos entered into an interest rate swap with a swap start date of December 31, 2012, swapping the LIBOR exposure on $100.0 million of floating rate debt under the new senior facility to a fixed rate to maturity obligation of 0.9475% plus the applicable margin on the debt expiring on December 21, 2017. The fair value of this interest rate swap is an asset of approximately $1.2 million as of December 31, 2013. As indicated elsewhere, the Company has increased the quarterly dividend on its Common Stock to an annual rate of $1.60 per share starting with the fourth quarter 2013 payment. That policy may change and is subject to numerous conditions and variables. See the section entitled “Dividends” in Item 5 of this Form 10-K. On December 31, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents outside the United States of $23.1 million, or 70% of the Company's balance. Further, the foreign cash amounts are not restricted by law to be used in other countries. Our current Page 33 of 82 operating plan does not include repatriation of any of the cash and cash equivalents held outside the United States to fund the United States operations. However, in the event we do repatriate cash and cash equivalents held outside of the United States, we may be required to accrue and pay United States taxes to repatriate these funds. The Company’s available financial resources allow for the continuation of dividend payments, pursuit of several “bolt- on” acquisition projects and further geographic expansion initiatives. We further believe that on-hand cash combined with cash generated from operations, including our Mexican operations, and availability under our revolving line of credit, will be sufficient to meet our obligations such as debt service, tax payments, capital expenditures and working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. We expect to fund all these obligations through our existing cash and our future operating cash flows. However, future operating performance for the Company is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and various other factors that are uncertain. If the cash flows and other capital resources available to the Company, such as its revolving loan facility, are insufficient to fund our debt and other liquidity needs, the Company may have to take alternative actions that differ from current operating plans. In April 2013, the Company paid $4.4 million to settle the 2005-2008 Mexican CNA Water Tax Claims under an amnesty program governed by the Mexican government. Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures were $33 million in 2013. Investment continues to be focused on capacity enhancements for US, Canada and Mexico Specialty Ingredients facilities, and further enhancing Mexico's reliability and efficiency, as well as flexibility, to process multiple grades of phosphate rock, consistent with the Company's supply chain diversification strategy. A new higher grade PPA operation was successfully commissioned in 2013 as part of the long term plant upgrade for Coatzacoalcos. This higher-grade PPA will further support internal needs for the US and Canada network and allow a continued upgrading of the product mix in the Latin America region. Our expectation for 2014 is for capital expenditure in the $45-50 million range. Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments The following table sets forth our long-term contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands): Contractual Obligations Term loan and revolver borrowings (1) Future Service Pension Benefits Other (2) Operating Leases Total contractual cash obligations Total 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Years ending December 31, $ 163,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 151,000 $ — $ — 11,689 370,334 31,867 760 123,811 5,389 917 86,273 5,353 1,038 58,273 4,769 1,127 58,273 3,290 1,212 43,704 2,981 6,635 — 10,085 $ 576,890 $ 133,960 $ 96,543 $ 68,080 $ 213,690 $ 47,897 $ 16,720 ______________________ (1) Amounts exclude interest payments. Interest on the $163.0 million current balance of the term loan and revolver borrowings at current rates would be approximately $3.9 million annually. Represents minimum annual purchase commitments to buy raw materials from suppliers. (2) Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to allowance for bad debts, the recoverability of long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible Page 34 of 82 assets, goodwill, depreciation and amortization periods, income taxes and commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Claims and Legal Proceedings The categories of asserted or unasserted claims for which the Company has estimated a probable liability and for which amounts are estimable are critical accounting estimates. Please refer to the section entitled “Commitments and Contingencies” in Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional information about such estimates. Deferred Taxes Deferred taxes are accounted for by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are assessed for recoverability and a valuation allowance is considered necessary if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. We continue to analyze our current and future profitability and probability of the realization of our net deferred tax assets in future periods. Please refer to the section entitled “Income Taxes” (contained in Note 15) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional information regarding deferred taxes. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of net assets of the businesses acquired. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other,” requires periodic tests of the impairment of goodwill. ASC 350 requires a comparison, at least annually, of the net book value of the assets and liabilities associated with a reporting unit, including goodwill, with the fair value of the reporting unit, which corresponds to the discounted cash flows of the reporting unit, in the absence of an active market. When this comparison indicates that impairment must be recorded, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of these assets. The annual goodwill impairment review is conducted during the fourth quarter of each year. Fair values for goodwill testing are estimated using a discounted cash flow approach. Significant estimates in the discounted cash flow approach include the cash flow forecasts for each of our reporting units, the discount rate and the terminal value. The five year cash flow forecasts of the company’s reporting units is based upon management’s estimate at the date of the assessment, which incorporates managements long-term view of selling prices, sales volumes for Innophos’ products, key raw materials and energy costs, and our operating cost structure. The aggregated fair value of our reporting units was reconciled to our market capitalization at the date of the assessment, plus a suitable control premium. The terminal value was determined by applying business growth factors for each reporting unit which are in-line with longer term historical growth rates, to the latest year for which a forecast exists. Our market capitalization during fourth quarter of 2013 exceeded the book value of our equity. Our reporting units for goodwill purposes are Specialty Phosphates United States, Specialty Phosphates Canada, Specialty Phosphates Mexico, Kelatron, AMT, Triarco and GTSP & Other. As of December 31, 2013, the fair values of our reporting units were substantially greater than their carrying values. Page 35 of 82 Long-lived assets Under ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” long-lived assets including property, plant and equipment and amortized intangible assets are evaluated and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The review of these long-lived assets is performed at the individual asset level, asset group level, or the product group level depending on the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent. The Company’s asset groupings or product groupings vary based on the interrelationship of the long-lived assets and the identifiable cash flows. For example, in certain instances, multiple manufacturing units may work with one another to produce the lowest identifiable cash flows or in other instances a stand-alone unit may produce the lowest level of identifiable cash flows. There are other instances where a stand-alone unit may produce multiple products and the lowest level of identifiable cash flows is at the product group level. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, asset group or product group. When this comparison indicates that impairment must be recorded, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. The determination of whether or not assets are impaired and the corresponding useful lives of these long-lived assets requires significant judgment. The development of future cash flow projections requires management estimates related to forecasted sales and expected costs trends. To the extent that changes in business conditions occur or other management decisions are made that result in adjusted management projections or alternative use of the assets, impairment losses or accelerated depreciation may occur in future periods. Stock-Based Compensation Expense Our compensation programs can include share-based payments. The primary share-based awards and their general terms and conditions currently in effect are as follows: • Stock options, which entitle the holder to purchase, after the end of a vesting term, a specified number of shares of Innophos common stock at an exercise price per share set equal to the market price of Innophos common stock on the date of grant. • Restricted stock grants, which entitle the holder to receive, at the end of each vesting term, a specified number of shares of Innophos common stock, and which also entitle the holder to receive dividends paid on such grants throughout the vesting period. • Performance share awards which entitle the holder to receive, at the end of a vesting term, a number of shares of Innophos common stock, within a range of shares from zero to a specified maximum, calculated using a multi-year future average return on performance parameters selected in advance as defined solely by reference to the Company’s own activities. Amounts equivalent to dividends will accrue over the performance period and are paid on performance share awards when vested and distributed. • Annual stock retainer grants, which entitle independent members of the Board of Directors to receive a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to a fixed retainer value. The fair value of the options granted during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model were as follows: Non-qualified stock options Expected volatility Dividend yield Risk-free interest rate Expected term Weighted average grant date fair value of stock options Year Ended December 31, 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2012 Year Ended December 31, 2011 50.4 % 2.8 % 1.0 % 6 years 53.2 % 2.4 % 1.3 % 6 years $ 19.99 $ 20.41 $ 54.4 % 2.3 % 2.3% 6 years 17.14 Since Innophos Holdings, Inc. was a newly public entity and has limited historical data on the price of its publicly traded shares, the expected volatility for the valuation of its stock options prior to 2009 was based on peer group historical volatility data equaling the expected term. Since 2009, the Company had chosen a blended volatility which consists of 50% historical Page 36 of 82 volatility average of a peer group and 50% historical volatility average of Innophos. The expected term for the stock options is based on the simplified method since the Company has limited data on the exercises of its stock options. These stock options qualify as “plain vanilla” stock options in accordance with SAB 110. The dividend yield is the expected annual dividend payments divided by the average stock price up to the date of grant. The risk-free interest rates are derived from the U.S. Treasury securities in effect on the date of grant whose maturity period equals the options expected term. The Company applies an expected forfeiture rate to stock-based compensation expense. The estimate of the forfeiture rate is based primarily upon historical experience of employee turnover. As actual forfeitures become known, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted accordingly. Pension and Post-Retirement Costs / Post-Employment Plan The Company maintains both noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that together cover all U.S. and Canadian employees. In the United States, salaried and hourly employees are covered by a defined contribution plan with a 401(k) feature. The plan provides for employee contributions, company matching contributions, and an age-weighted annual company contribution to eligible employees. Union-represented hourly employees at our Nashville site are covered by a traditional defined benefit plan providing benefits based on years of service and final average pay whose benefit accruals were frozen as of August 1, 2007, after which the Nashville union employees began participating in the Company’s existing noncontributory defined contribution benefit plan. All plans were established by Innophos in 2004. In Canada, salaried employees are covered by defined contribution plans which provide for company contributions as a percent of pay, employee contributions, and company matching contributions. Union-represented hourly employees are covered by a defined benefit plan providing benefits based on a negotiated benefit level and years of service. Our pension and postretirement benefit costs are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including the discount rate and the expected long-term rate on plan assets. These assumptions require significant judgment and material changes in our pension and postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions, changes in levels of benefits provided, and changes in asset levels. Such assumptions are based on benchmarks obtained from third party sources. As a sensitivity measure, the effect of a 25 basis-point decrease in our discount rate assumption would increase our net periodic benefit cost for our pension and post-retirement plans by approximately $81 thousand. A 1% decrease in our expected rate of return on plan assets would increase our pension plan expense by $178 thousand. Recently Issued Accounting Standards New accounting standards effective in 2013 are described in the Recent Accounting Pronouncements section in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations. Primary exposures include changes in interest rates, as borrowings under our Loan Agreement will bear interest at floating rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable borrowing margin. We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt to the extent practicable consistent with our credit status. For fixed-rate debt, interest rate changes do not affect earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for floating-rate debt, interest rate changes generally affect our earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. At December 31, 2013, we had $96.0 million principal amount of term loan debt and a $225.0 million revolving credit facility, of which $67.0 million was outstanding, both of which approximate fair value (determined using level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy). Total remaining availability was $159.7 million, taking into account $2.3 million in face amount of letters of credit issued under the sub-facility. Simultaneously with initiating the new senior facility in December of 2012, we entered into an interest rate swap with a swap start date of December 31, 2012, swapping the LIBOR exposure on $100 million of floating rate debt under the new senior facility to a fixed rate to maturity obligation of 0.9475% expiring in December 2017. The fair value of this interest rate swap is an asset of approximately $1.2 million as of December 31, 2013. Changes in economic conditions could result in higher interest rates, thereby increasing our interest expense on our revolving line of credit. Changes in economic conditions may also result in lower operating income, reducing our funds available for capital investment, operations or other purposes. In addition, a substantial portion of our cash flow has been used to service debt and fund working capital needs, which may affect our ability to make future acquisitions or capital expenditures. Page 37 of 82 We may from time to time use interest rate protection agreements to minimize our exposure to interest rate fluctuation. Regardless of hedges, we may experience economic loss and a negative impact on earnings or net assets as a result of interest rate fluctuations. Based on $67.0 million outstanding borrowings as floating rate debt (not included in the swap) under our revolving credit facility, an immediate increase of one percentage point would cause an increase to interest expense of approximately $0.7 million per year. From time to time, we will enter into longer term natural gas and electricity supply contracts in an effort to eliminate some of the volatility in our energy costs. Though we did not do so in 2013, in 2012 we did enter into an economic hedge for approximately 75% of our 2012 U.S. & Canada natural gas requirements. We do not currently, but may from time to time, hedge our currency rate risks. We believe that our concentration of credit risk related to trade accounts receivable is limited since these receivables are spread among a number of customers and are geographically dispersed. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales in the last 3 years. Foreign Currency Exchange Rates The U.S. Dollar is the functional currency of the Canadian and Mexican operations. Accordingly, these operations’ monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates, non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates, and revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates and at historical exchange rates for the related revenue and expenses of non-monetary assets and liabilities. All transaction gains and losses are included in net income. Our principal source of exchange rate exposure in our foreign operations consists of expenses, such as labor expenses, which are denominated in the foreign currency of the country in which we operate. A decline in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to the local currency would generally cause our operational expenses (particularly labor costs) to increase (conversely, a decline in the value of the foreign currency relative to the U.S. Dollar would cause these expenses to decrease). We believe that normal exchange rate fluctuations consistent with recent historical trends would have a modest impact on our expenses, and would not materially affect our financial condition or results of operations. Nearly all of our sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars and our exchange rate exposure in terms of sales revenues is minimal. Inflation and changing prices Our costs and expenses will be subject to inflation and price fluctuations. Significant price fluctuations in raw materials, freight, and energy costs, if not compensated for by cost savings from production efficiencies or price increases passed on to customers could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Refer to “Item 1A. Risk Factors” contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on raw materials availability and pricing. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as “structured finance or special purpose entities”, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off- balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Page 38 of 82 ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years ended December 31, 2013 Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years ended December 31, 2013 Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2013 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Page 40 41 42 43 44 45 Page 39 of 82 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Innophos Holdings, Inc.: In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Innophos Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992 Edition) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements, and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Florham Park, New Jersey February 27, 2014 Page 40 of 82 INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts, the number of shares or where otherwise noted) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, net Inventories Other current assets Total current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Goodwill Intangibles and other assets, net Total assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt Accounts payable, trade and other Other current liabilities Total current liabilities Long-term debt Other long-term liabilities Total liabilities Commitments and contingencies (note 16) Common stock, par value $.001 per share; authorized 100,000,000; issued 22,327,670 and 22,110,249; outstanding 21,893,137 and 21,830,870 shares Paid-in capital Common stock held in treasury, at cost (434,533 and 279,379 shares) Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total stockholders' equity Total liabilities and stockholders' equity See notes to consolidated financial statements December 31, 2013 2012 $ $ $ $ 32,755 88,434 181,467 81,472 384,128 201,985 84,373 74,691 745,177 4,002 38,717 34,124 76,843 159,007 45,908 281,758 $ $ $ $ 22 120,046 (19,599) 364,515 (1,565) 463,419 745,177 $ $ 26,815 94,033 162,940 99,944 383,732 195,723 83,108 75,948 738,511 4,000 36,424 46,030 86,454 172,000 35,734 294,188 22 115,782 (12,411) 346,866 (5,936) 444,323 738,511 Page 41 of 82 INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts, the number of shares or where otherwise noted) Net sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Operating expenses: Selling, general and administrative Research & development expenses Total operating expenses Operating income Interest expense, net Foreign exchange losses (gains) Income before income taxes Provision for income taxes Net income Net income attributable to common shareholders Per share data (see Note 12): Income per share: Basic Diluted Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic Diluted Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: Change in interest rate swaps, (net of tax ($825), $71 and $448) Change in pension and post-retirement plans, (net of tax ($1,359), $572 and $388) Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax Comprehensive income $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2013 844,129 685,830 158,299 $ Year Ended December 31, 2012 862,399 684,979 177,420 $ 70,501 3,928 74,429 83,870 4,426 3,197 76,247 26,741 49,506 49,442 $ 64,320 3,107 67,427 109,993 5,977 (1,957) 105,973 31,783 74,190 74,150 $ 2011 810,487 605,172 205,315 65,380 2,923 68,303 137,012 5,726 875 130,411 43,889 86,522 86,522 2.25 2.21 $ $ 3.40 3.30 $ $ 3.99 3.83 21,933,843 22,345,980 21,795,155 22,475,881 21,694,453 22,578,567 1,345 $ (114) $ (732) 3,026 4,371 53,877 $ $ (827) (941) $ $ 73,249 (1,174) (1,906) 84,616 See notes to consolidated financial statements Page 42 of 82 INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Dollars and shares in thousands) Number of Common Shares Common Stock Retained Earnings (Deficit) Paid-in Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Total Shareholders' Equity Balance December 31, 2010 Net income Other comprehensive loss, (net of tax $836) Proceeds from stock award exercises and issuances Share-based compensation Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options Common stock repurchases Restricted stock forfeitures Dividends declared Balance, December 31, 2011 Net income Other comprehensive loss, (net of tax $643) Proceeds from stock award exercises and issuances Share-based compensation Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options Common stock repurchases Treasury stock reissued for acquisition of business Dividends declared Balance, December 31, 2012 Net income Other comprehensive income, (net of tax ($2,184)) Proceeds from stock award exercises and issuances Share-based compensation Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options Common stock repurchases Restricted stock forfeitures Dividends declared Balance, December 31, 2013 21,464 $ 21 $ 227,752 $ 106,032 $ (3,089) $ 86,522 (1,906) 307 1 (150) (1 ) (2,600) 6,250 2,511 (6,139) (17) 21,620 $ 22 $ 292,144 $ 106,037 $ (4,995) $ (22,130 ) 74,190 (941) 340 (150) 21 (2,255) 1,912 3,931 (7,254) 1,000 (19,468 ) 21,831 $ 22 $ 346,866 $ 103,371 $ (5,936) $ 49,506 217 — (150) (5 ) 4,371 (759) 2,174 2,849 (7,118) (70) 21,893 $ 22 $ 364,515 $ 100,447 $ (1,565) $ (31,857 ) See notes to consolidated financial statements 330,716 86,522 (1,906) (2,599) 6,250 2,511 (6,139) (17) (22,130) 393,208 74,190 (941) (2,255) 1,912 3,931 (7,254) 1,000 (19,468) 444,323 49,506 4,371 (759) 2,174 2,849 (7,118) (70) (31,857) 463,419 Page 43 of 82 INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Dollars in thousands) Cash flows from operating activities Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Amortization of deferred financing charges Deferred income tax provision Deferred profit sharing Share-based compensation Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable (Increase) decrease in inventories Decrease (increase) in other current assets Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Decrease in other current liabilities Changes in other long-term assets and liabilities Net cash provided from operating activities Cash flows used for investing activities: Capital expenditures Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired Net cash used for investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from exercise of stock options Long-term debt borrowings Long-term debt repayments Deferred financing costs Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options Common stock repurchases Dividends paid Net cash used for financing activities Net change in cash Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents at end of period Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 $ 49,506 $ 74,190 $ 86,522 35,461 559 1,484 — 2,174 5,898 (18,402) 27,144 2,224 (11,913) (2,836) 91,299 42,334 884 167 — 1,912 13,017 12,154 (21,283) 2,059 (20,573) (3,456) 101,405 (33,415) (4,425) (33,060) (71,706) (37,840) (104,766) 1,650 63,007 (76,000) — 2,849 (7,188) (31,837) (47,519) 5,940 26,815 32,755 $ 528 333,000 (309,000) (1,461) 3,931 (7,254) (24,810) (5,066) (8,427) 35,242 26,815 $ 43,676 608 5,379 (286) 6,250 (28,154) (45,021) 3,238 (5,939) (14,685) (5,242) 46,346 (34,195) (20,533) (54,728) 484 22,000 (19,000) — 2,511 (6,156) (19,921) (20,082) (28,464) 63,706 35,242 $ See notes to consolidated financial statements Page 44 of 82 INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts, the number of shares or where otherwise noted) 1. Basis of Statement Presentation: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Fiscal Year Our fiscal year end is December 31. Description of Business and Principles of Consolidation Innophos is a leading international producer of mineral based performance-critical specialty ingredients with applications in food, beverage, pharmaceutical, oral care and industrial end markets. Innophos combines more than a century of experience in specialty phosphate manufacture with a growing capability in a broad range of other specialty ingredients, to supply a product range produced to the highest standards of quality and consistency demanded by customers worldwide. Many of Innophos' products are application-specific compounds engineered to meet customer performance requirements and are often critical to the taste, texture, performance or nutritional content of foods, beverages, pharmaceuticals, oral care products and other applications. For example, Innophos products act as flavor enhancers in beverages, electrolytes in sports drinks, texture additives in cheeses, leavening agents in baked goods, pharmaceutical excipients, cleaning agents in toothpaste and provide a wide range of nutritional fortification solutions for food, beverage and nutritional supplement manufacturers. In October 2011, Innophos acquired 100% of the stock of Kelatron's holding company, KI Acquisition, Inc., for a purchase price of approximately $21 million, subject to specified adjustments. Founded in 1975 and based in Ogden, Utah, Kelatron is a leading producer of technically advanced bioactive mineral ingredients, with a high quality base of customers in the supplement and sports nutrition markets. Bioactive mineral ingredients are manufactured to enhance the digestive system's ability to absorb these essential minerals. Kelatron products deliver a wide range of minerals that are essential in small quantities to a balanced diet (micronutrients) and are highly complementary to the macronutrients of calcium, magnesium, potassium and phosphorus currently manufactured by Innophos. In July 2012, Innophos acquired 100% of the equity of AMT Labs, Inc. and an affiliated real estate company holding all AMT real property for $26.9 million, with $19.4 million being allocated to the AMT purchase and $7.5 million being allocated to the real estate entity. Located in North Salt Lake, Utah, AMT has been manufacturing bioactive mineral ingredients for the food, beverage, confectionary and dietary supplement industries for more than 20 years. In December 2012, Innophos purchased all of Triarco Industries, Inc., ("Triarco"), assets for $45 million in cash plus $1 million in shares of Innophos Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Triarco, a privately held company based in New Jersey, has been manufacturing high quality custom ingredients for the food, beverage, dietary supplement and nutraceutical industries for more than 30 years. Triarco specializes in botanical and enzyme based ingredients that provide important benefits in growing markets such as sports nutrition, dietary supplements and fortified beverages. In October 2013, Innophos purchased all of the assets of Chelated Minerals International, Inc., (CMI), for $5 million in cash. CMI, a privately held company based in Salt Lake City, Utah, has significant knowhow in the manufacture and science of chelated minerals supplied to the human nutrition market. Innophos Holdings, Inc. is the parent of Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc., which is the parent to Innophos Investments II, Inc., which owns 100% of Innophos, Inc.; all are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. All intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Out of Period Adjustments During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we identified an adjustment necessary for a long-term supply contract. We corrected this item during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, which had the effect of increasing cost of goods sold by $2.3 million, and decreasing net income by $1.6 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we identified certain adjustments in our financial statements related to 2011 through the first quarter of fiscal 2012. We corrected the items during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, which had the effect of increasing cost of goods sold by $2.4 million and decreasing net income by $1.6 million. These prior period adjustments are not material to the financial results of the previously issued annual financial statements or the 2013 financial statements. Page 45 of 82 Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of judgments and estimates made by management. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of the more significant estimates pertaining to the Company include accruals for contingencies, distributor incentives and rebates, the valuation of inventories, the allowance for doubtful accounts, income tax valuation allowances, the recoverability of long-lived assets and goodwill analysis and cash flows and assumptions used in the recognition and measurement of assets acquired in business combinations. Management routinely reviews its estimates and assumptions utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, and historical experience. Cash Equivalents All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable and Allowances for Doubtful Accounts Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and does not bear interest. The collectability of accounts receivable is evaluated based on a combination of factors. Allowances for doubtful accounts are recorded based on the length of time the receivables are past due and historical experience. In circumstances when it is probable that a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations, an allowance is recorded against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount that is reasonably expected to be collected. Inventories Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the basis of the first-in, first-out method. These costs include raw materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead and depreciation. Spare parts are included in inventory and are initially recorded at cost. Inventories, including spare parts, are evaluated for excess quantities, obsolescence or shelf-life expiration. This evaluation includes an analysis of historical sales levels by product and projections of future demand. To the extent management determines there are excess, obsolete or expired inventory quantities, valuation reserves are recorded against all or a portion of the value of the related products with the appropriate charge to cost of goods sold. Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of all property, plant and equipment retired or otherwise disposed of are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in net income. Interest is capitalized in connection with the construction of major renewals and improvements. Capitalized interest is recorded as part of the asset to which it relates and is amortized over the asset’s estimated useful life. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, typically ranging from ten to forty years for buildings and improvements, three to twenty years for machinery and equipment, and three to seven years for capitalized software. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is less. External direct costs in developing or obtaining internal use computer software and payroll, and payroll-related costs for employees dedicated solely to the project, to the extent of the time spent directly on the project and which they meet the requirements of ASC 350-40, are capitalized. Long-Lived Assets Under ASC 360,” Property, Plant, and Equipment,” long-lived assets including property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets are evaluated and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The review of these long-lived assets is performed at the individual asset level, asset group level, or the product group level depending on the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent. The Company’s asset groupings or product groupings vary based on the interrelationship of the long-lived assets and the identifiable cash flows. For example, in certain instances, multiple manufacturing units may work with one another to produce the lowest identifiable cash flows or in other instances a stand-alone unit may produce the lowest Page 46 of 82 level of identifiable cash flows. There are other instances where a stand-alone unit may produce multiple products and the lowest level of identifiable cash flows is at the product group level. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset, asset group or product group. When this comparison indicates that impairment must be recorded, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. The determination of whether or not assets are impaired and the corresponding useful lives of these long-lived assets requires significant judgment. The development of future cash flow projections requires management estimates related to forecasted sales and expected costs trends. To the extent that changes in business conditions occur or other management decisions are made that result in adjusted management projections or alternative use of the assets, impairment losses or accelerated depreciation may occur in future periods. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition cost over the fair value of net assets of the businesses acquired. ASC 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other,” requires periodic tests of the impairment of goodwill. ASC 350 requires a comparison, at least annually, of the net book value of the assets and liabilities associated with a reporting unit, including goodwill, with the fair value of the reporting unit, which corresponds to the discounted cash flows of the reporting unit, in the absence of an active market. If the entity determines that it's more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount, then performing the traditional two-step impairment test is unnecessary. If a company determines otherwise, then it is required to perform the first step of the two-step impairment test. When this comparison indicates that impairment must be recorded, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of these assets. The annual goodwill impairment review is conducted during the fourth quarter of each year. Other Intangible Assets Other intangible assets, which consist of developed technology, customer relationships, tradenames, a non-compete agreement, patents, licenses and software, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives which can be up to twenty years. Revenue Recognition Revenue from sales of our products to our customers is recognized when title and risk of loss passes to the customer, which occurs either upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the agreed sales terms with customers. In the United States and Canada, the Company records estimated reductions to revenue for distributor incentives and customer incentives such as rebates, at the time of the initial sale. Distributor and customer incentives in Mexico are immaterial to the financial statements. The estimated reductions are based on the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis. Accruals for distributor incentives are reflected as a direct reduction to accounts receivable and accruals for rebates are recorded as accrued expenses. This analysis requires a significant amount of judgment from management. Changes in the assumptions used to calculate these estimates or changes resulting from actual results are recorded against revenue in the period in which the change occurs. Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs and Advertising Expenses Shipping and handling fees and costs invoiced to customers are included in Net sales. Shipping and handling fees and costs incurred by the Company are included in Cost of goods sold. Advertising expenses, which are not significant, are expensed as incurred. Foreign Currency Translation The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of the Canadian and Mexican operations. Accordingly, these operations monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates, non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses related to monetary assets and liabilities are translated at average exchange rates and at historical exchange rates for the related revenue and expenses of non-monetary assets and liabilities. All translation gains and losses are included in net income. Page 47 of 82 Research and Development Expenses Research and development expenditures, including expenditures relating to the development of new products and processes and significant improvements and refinements to existing products, are expensed as incurred. Employee Termination Benefits The Company does not have a written severance plan for its Mexican operations, nor does it offer similar termination benefits to affected employees in all Mexican restructuring initiatives however, Mexican law requires payment of certain minimum termination benefits. Accordingly, in situations where minimum statutory termination benefits must be paid to the affected employees, the Company records employee severance costs associated with these activities in accordance with ASC 712, Compensation – Nonretirement Post Employment Benefits. The Company does have a written severance plan which is in accordance with ASC 712 for its U.S. and Canadian operations. The Company has an accrued obligation for post-employment benefits for U.S. and Canadian operations when the amounts are probable and reasonably estimated. In all other situations where the Company pays out termination benefits, including supplemental benefits paid in excess of statutory minimum amounts and benefits offered to affected employees based on management’s discretion, the Company records these termination costs in accordance with ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. The timing of the recognition of charges for employee severance costs depends on whether the affected employees are required to render service beyond their legal notification period in order to receive the benefits. If affected employees are required to render service beyond their legal notification period, charges are recognized ratably over the future service period. Otherwise, charges are recognized when a specific plan has been confirmed by management and required employee communication requirements have been met. Legal Costs The Company expenses legal costs as incurred, including those legal costs which may be incurred in connection with a loss contingency. Income Taxes The Company’s United States subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. tax return. The Company's Mexican subsidiaries file a consolidated Mexico tax return. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases using enacted tax rates applied to those differences. Deferred tax assets are assessed for realizability and a valuation allowance is provided if a portion of the associated tax benefit is not expected to be realized. If any material uncertain tax positions arise, the Company’s policy is to accrue associated penalties in selling, general and administrative expenses and to accrue interest as part of net interest expense. Other than the assessments disclosed in Note 15, Income Taxes, as of December 31, 2013, no significant adjustments have been proposed to the Company's tax positions and the Company currently does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material change to its financial position during the next twelve months. Environmental Costs Environmental liabilities are recorded undiscounted when it is probable that these liabilities have been incurred and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. These liabilities are estimated based on an assessment of many factors, including the amount of remediation costs, the timing and extent of remediation actions required by the applicable governmental authorities, and the amount of the Company’s liability after considering the liability and financial resources of other potentially responsible parties. Generally, the recording of these accruals coincides with the assertion of a claim or litigation, completion of a feasibility study or a commitment to a formal plan of action. Anticipated recoveries from third parties are recorded as a reduction of expense only when such amounts are realized. Any insurance receivables would be recorded gross of the estimated liability. Page 48 of 82 Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) is composed of net income (loss), adjusted for changes in comprehensive income items such as changes in defined benefit pension plan funded status. Share-based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense for its Long-Term Incentive Plans (LTIP). Under applicable accounting standards, the fair value of share-based compensation is determined at the grant date and the recognition of the related expense is recorded over the period in which the share-based compensation vests. Refer to Note 11 for additional information. Business Combinations An acquired business is included in the consolidated financial statements upon obtaining control of the acquired assets. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized at the date of acquisition at their respective fair values. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired is recognized as goodwill. Recently Issued Accounting Standards Adopted In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued a pronouncement updating the accounting for financial instruments, which clarifies the scope of disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. This pronouncement limits the scope of instruments subject to the offsetting disclosures to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending agreements subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. This pronouncement is effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations. In February 2013, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). The amendment expands the existing disclosure by requiring entities to present information about significant items reclassified out of AOCI by component. In addition, an entity is required to provide information about the effects on net income of significant amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI to net income either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or as a separate disclosure in the notes of the financial statements. The amendment is effective prospectively for annual or interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations. In July 2013, the FASB issued amendments to allow the Federal Funds Effective Swap Rate (which is the Overnight Index Swap rate, or OIS rate, in the U.S.) to be designated as a benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under the derivatives and hedging guidance. The amendments also allow for the use of different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The amendments are effective prospectively for qualifying new or redesignated hedging relationships entered into on or after July 17, 2013. The initial adoption had no impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operation. In July 2013, the FASB issued amendments to guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The amendments require entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit netted against certain deferred tax assets when specific requirements are met. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 (early adoption is permitted). The Company has elected to early adopt which had no material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operation. Issued but not yet adopted None. 2. Acquisitions: The Company has made three recent acquisitions in the bioactive mineral ingredients sector and one recent acquisition in botanical and enzyme based specialty food ingredients. Bioactive mineral ingredients are mineral based ingredients for food, Page 49 of 82 beverage and dietary supplement end markets that are manufactured to be readily digestible. Historically, Innophos has enjoyed a strong position in “macronutrients,” minerals such as calcium, magnesium and potassium that are required in relatively large amounts for a balanced diet. The human diet also requires smaller quantities of a wide range of other minerals such as chromium, selenium, zinc and iron classified as “micronutrients.” The bioactive mineral acquisitions described below have created a strong position for Innophos in micronutrient ingredients to complement the Company's existing strength in macronutrients while the acquisition of a botanical and enzyme based product line further enhances the Company's ability to supply a broad range of nutrition fortification solutions to its customers. In October 2011, Innophos acquired privately held Kelatron Corporation in a transaction accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Kelatron, based in Ogden, Utah, is a leading producer of technically advanced bioactive mineral ingredients, with a high quality base of customers in the dietary supplement and sports nutrition markets. The acquisition had a purchase price of approximately $21 million in cash, subject to working capital adjustments, and was funded from our revolving line of credit. Under the acquisition method of accounting, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date. The reported consolidated financial condition and results of operations after completion of the acquisition reflect those fair values, and Kelatron's results of operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The purchase accounting for the acquisition has been closed and immaterial adjustments were recognized in the second quarter of 2012. In July 2012, Innophos purchased AMT Labs, Inc. and an affiliated company holding real property to support future expansion. AMT, a privately held company based in North Salt Lake, Utah, has been manufacturing high quality bioactive mineral ingredients for the food, beverage, confectionary and dietary supplement industries for more than 20 years. The combined purchase price was $26.9 million in cash, with $19.4 million being allocated to the AMT purchase and $7.5 million being allocated to the real estate entity, plus a contingent payment arrangement. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement was zero. Closing of the purchase occurred upon execution of the definitive agreements effective as of December 31, 2012. The purchase consideration was funded from our revolving line of credit, as well as cash from operations. The purchase accounting for the acquisition was closed in the first quarter of 2013 and no adjustments were recognized. In December 2012, Innophos acquired the assets of Triarco Industries, Inc. ("Triarco"). Triarco, a privately held company based in New Jersey, has been manufacturing high quality custom ingredients for the food, beverage and dietary supplement industries for more than 30 years. Triarco specializes in botanical and enzyme based ingredients that provide important nutritional benefits and are often formulated with bioactive minerals and specialty phosphates. In the transaction, an Innophos subsidiary purchased all of Triarco's assets for $44.8 million in cash plus $1 million in shares of Innophos Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. The cash portion of the purchase price was financed by Innophos from borrowings under the company's senior credit facility. The acquisition includes potential for additional incentive compensation, payable to certain previous owners of Triarco who joined the Company, contingent upon success in delivering growth objectives over the next two years. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement is determined to be zero based on the probability of achievement. Closing of the purchase occurred upon execution of the definitive agreements effective as of December 31, 2012. Acquisition related costs of $0.7 million were expensed as incurred and were included in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2012. An additional fair value adjustment decreasing inventory (and increasing goodwill) by approximately $0.7 million was recognized in 2013. This fair value adjustment has been reclassified on the December 31, 2012 balance sheet. The purchase accounting for the acquisition was closed in the fourth quarter of 2013 at which time a $0.6 million decrease in the purchase price and a $0.8 million decrease in goodwill were recognized. In October 2013, Innophos purchased substantially all of the assets of privately held Chelated Minerals International, Inc., (CMI), based in Salt Lake City, Utah. CMI has significant knowhow in the manufacture and science of chelated minerals supplied to the human nutrition market. The acquisition of CMI strengthens Innophos’ position in micronutrient ingredients, which further enhances the Company’s ability to supply a broad range of nutrition fortification solutions to its customers. Innophos enjoys a strong position in macronutrient minerals such as calcium, magnesium and potassium that are required in relatively large amounts for a balanced diet. The human diet also requires smaller quantities of a wide range of other minerals such as chromium, selenium, zinc and iron classified as micronutrients. The acquisition had a purchase price of approximately $5 million, subject to specified adjustments, and was funded from cash on-hand. Page 50 of 82 The final purchase price allocation for AMT and Triarco and the preliminary purchase price allocation for CMI resulted in the following amounts being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date based upon their respective fair values summarized below: Cash Accounts receivable Inventory, including fair value adjustment of $270, $468 and $20 Other current assets Property, plant and equipment Goodwill Intangible assets Accounts payable Other current liabilities Total AMT Triarco CMI $ 325 849 2,020 39 9,483 5,047 10,050 $ — $ 1,788 3,346 736 2,864 16,508 22,100 (377) (219) (1,348) (180) $ 27,217 $ 45,814 $ 97 299 125 — 1,092 1,265 2,348 (69 ) (57 ) 5,100 The intangible assets acquired with AMT, Triarco and CMI include the following: Customer relationships Developed technology Tradename Non-compete agreement Useful life (years) 10-15 $ 7-8 5-10 3-10 AMT Triarco 7,040 $ 10,720 1,900 4,590 930 6,300 $ 180 $ 10,050 490 $ 22,100 $ CMI 1,761 353 211 23 2,348 These three transactions were treated as an asset purchase for U.S. federal tax purposes. The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition and will be included in the Specialty Phosphates US segment. The Company expects the goodwill created to be deductible for tax purposes. Pro forma financial information (unaudited): The following unaudited pro forma information presents the combined results of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 as if the acquisition of CMI had been completed on January 1, 2012 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 as if the acquisitions of AMT and Triarco had been completed on January 1, 2012. The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect any material adjustments, operating efficiencies or potential cost savings which may result from the consolidation of operations. Revenues Net income Income per common share - Basic Income per common share - Diluted Year Ended December 31, 2012 2013 894,019 845,610 69,823 49,571 3.20 2.26 3.11 2.22 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Page 51 of 82 3. Inventories: Inventories consist of the following: Raw materials Finished products Spare parts 2013 60,157 108,334 12,976 181,467 $ $ 2012 49,856 103,562 9,522 162,940 $ $ Inventory reserves for excess quantities, obsolescence or shelf-life expiration as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were $13,857 and $11,551, respectively. 4. Other Current Assets: Other current assets consist of the following: Creditable taxes (value added taxes) Vendor inventory deposits (prepaid) Prepaid income taxes Other prepaids Deferred income taxes Other 2013 2012 $ $ 24,257 14,820 12,269 3,524 21,589 5,013 81,472 $ $ 35,181 19,445 22,000 2,884 12,917 7,517 99,944 Page 52 of 82 5. Property, Plant and Equipment, net: Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consist of the following: Land Land improvements - Buildings and improvements - Machinery & Equipment - Construction-in-progress 2013 2012 Useful life (years) - 3-15 2-9 10 14-16 20 25-34 1-4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12-13 15-25 - Gross $ 19,213 10,424 9,433 11,112 11,950 32,982 22,193 14,416 32,486 49,201 50,607 158,171 26,691 8,384 12,856 11,606 72,052 11,885 $ 565,662 $ Accumulated Depreciation — 8,361 9,141 5,506 6,528 9,876 4,605 7,677 22,467 49,161 32,908 135,164 26,144 3,493 10,496 9,029 23,121 — $ 363,677 Net Book Value $ 19,213 2,063 292 5,606 5,422 23,106 17,588 6,739 10,019 40 17,699 23,007 547 4,891 2,360 2,577 48,931 11,885 Gross $ 18,613 9,976 9,342 10,481 10,409 24,937 21,883 7,066 28,850 49,203 50,601 152,713 26,691 9,276 12,349 11,606 57,263 20,708 $ 201,985 $ 531,967 $ Accumulated Depreciation — 8,027 9,050 4,477 5,676 8,546 3,867 5,280 19,315 49,151 29,106 128,340 24,367 3,457 9,421 8,058 20,106 — $ 336,244 Net Book Value $ 18,613 1,949 292 6,004 4,733 16,391 18,016 1,786 9,535 52 21,495 24,373 2,324 5,819 2,928 3,548 37,157 20,708 $ 195,723 Depreciation expense, excluding immaterial depreciation expense in changes of inventory, was $28,147, $37,930 and $39,006 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Unamortized capitalized software, included in machinery and equipment, was $15,374 and $21,572 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. 6. Goodwill: Balance, December 31, 2011 Investment in AMT Investment in Triarco Investment in Kelatron Balance, December 31, 2012 Investment in CMI Balance, December 31, 2013 Specialty Phosphates Canada 2,530 $ Specialty Phosphates Mexico $ 38,584 GTSP & Other $ 3,355 Specialty Phosphates US $ 17,118 5,047 16,508 (34) 38,639 1,265 $ 39,904 2,530 38,584 3,355 $ 2,530 $ 38,584 $ 3,355 Total 61,587 5,047 16,508 (34) 83,108 1,265 $ 84,373 Page 53 of 82 7. Intangibles and Other Assets, net: Intangibles and other assets consist of the following: Developed technology and application patents, net of accumulated amortization of $19,015 for 2013 and $16,155 for 2012 Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $10,295 for 2013 and $7,666 for 2012 Tradenames and license agreements, net of accumulated amortization of $6,198 for 2013 and $4,852 for 2012 Non-compete agreement, net of accumulated amortization of $796 for 2013 and $644 for 2012 Total Intangibles Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,652 for 2013 and $1,092 for 2012 (see note 9) Other Assets Total other assets Useful life (years) 2013 2012 7-20 25,817 5-15 28,517 5-20 11,463 3-10 $ $ $ $ 537 66,334 2,008 6,349 8,357 74,691 $ $ $ $ 28,325 29,384 12,598 666 70,973 2,567 2,408 4,975 75,948 Amortization expense for intangibles was $6,987, $4,567 and $3,528 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Anticipated amortization expense for the next five years related to intangibles is as follows: Intangible amortization expense 2014 7,170 $ $ 2015 7,129 $ 2016 7,104 $ 2017 6,912 $ 2018 6,558 The preceding expected amortization expense is an estimate. Actual amounts of amortization expense may differ from estimated amounts due to additional intangible asset acquisitions, impairment of intangible assets, accelerated amortization of intangible assets and other events. In 2013, the Company acquired $2.3 million of intangible assets as part of its acquisition of Chelated Minerals International, LLC and in 2012, acquired $10.1 million and $22.1 million as part of its acquisitions of AMT and Triarco, respectively. (see Note 2). 8. Other Current Liabilities: Other current liabilities consist of the following: CNA water tax claims (see Note 16) Payroll related Taxes other than income taxes Benefits and pensions Freight and rebates Income taxes Other 2013 2012 — 8,680 5,610 7,240 3,960 3,879 4,755 34,124 $ $ 10,855 10,723 8,352 6,727 4,604 — 4,769 46,030 $ $ Page 54 of 82 9. Short-term Borrowings, Long-Term Debt, and Interest Expense: Short-term borrowings and long-term debt consist of the following: Term loan due 2017 Revolver borrowings under the credit facility Capital leases Total borrowings Less current portion Long-term debt 2013 96,000 67,000 9 163,009 4,002 159,007 $ $ $ 2012 100,000 76,000 — 176,000 4,000 172,000 $ $ $ In August, 2010, Innophos entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a group of lenders (collectively, the “Lenders”). This agreement was amended and restated on December 21, 2012 increasing the Company's borrowing capacity, reducing interest rates extending the maturity to December 21, 2017. The Credit Agreement provides Innophos with a term loan of $100.0 million and a revolving line of credit from the Lenders of up to $225.0 million, including a $20.0 million letter of credit sub-facility, all maturing on December 21, 2017. Prepayments of term loan are required at the rate of 1% of original principal amount per quarter beginning on March 31, 2013. Interest accruing on amounts borrowed under the term loan and revolving line is based on an applicable margin over LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) or bank base rate, ranging from 125 to 225 basis points for LIBOR and 25 to 125 basis points for base rate loans, in each case with loan period and interest alternative as chosen by the Company, which margin is adjusted quarterly depending on a total leverage ratio (as computed under the Credit Agreement) for the period in question. Commitment fees on the unused revolving line range from 15 to 37.5 basis points, depending on total leverage ratio (as computed under the Credit Agreement) for the period in question. The current applicable margin for LIBOR based loans, base rate loans and the commitment fee are 150, 50 and 20 basis points, respectively. The Credit Agreement also provides for possible additional revolving indebtedness under an incremental facility of up to $50.0 million (i.e. an aggregate of revolving capacity up to $275.0 million) upon future request by Innophos Holdings, Inc. to existing Lenders (and depending on their consent) or from other willing financial institutions invited by the Company and reasonably acceptable to the administrative agent to join in the Credit Agreement. This revolving credit facility increase, if implemented, may provide for higher applicable margins to either the increased portion or possibly the entire revolving credit facility, with limitations, for interest rates than those in effect for the original revolving commitments under the Credit Agreement. The obligations of the Company under the Credit Agreement are secured by first priority liens on substantially all the United States assets of the Company, as well as a pledge of 65% of the voting equity of entities holding the Companies’ foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains representations given to the Lenders about the nature and status of the Companies’ business that serve as conditions to future borrowings, and affirmative, as well as negative, covenants typical of senior facilities of this kind that prohibit or limit a variety of actions by the Companies and their subsidiaries generally without the Lenders’ approval. These include covenants that affect the ability of those entities, among other things, to (a) incur or guarantee indebtedness, (b) create liens, (c) enter into mergers, recapitalizations or assets purchases or sales, (d) change names, (e) make certain changes to their business, (f) make restricted payments that include dividends, purchases and redemptions of equity (g) make advances, investments or loans, (h) effect sales and leasebacks or (i) enter into transactions with affiliates, (j) allow negative pledges or limitations on the repayment abilities of subsidiaries or (k) amend subordinated debt. However, subject to continued compliance with the overall leverage restrictions described in more detail below, the Companies retain flexibility under the Credit Agreement to develop their business and achieve strategic goals by, among other things, being permitted to take on additional debt, pay dividends (as long as the Total Leverage Ratio shall be .25 less than the then applicable level described below), re-acquire equity and make domestic acquisitions. Foreign acquisitions and investments are also permitted up to a fixed limit which is set initially at $100.0 million and can increase with ongoing cash generation up to as high as $300.0 million. Page 55 of 82 Among its affirmative covenants, the Credit Agreement requires the Companies to maintain the following consolidated ratios (as defined and calculated according to the Credit Agreement) as of the end of each fiscal quarter: (a) “Total Leverage Ratio” less than or equal to 3.00 to 1.00. (b) “Senior Leverage Ratio” less than or equal to 2.50 to 1.00. (c) “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio” greater than or equal to 1.25 to 1.00. As of December 31, 2013, the Total Leverage Ratio, Senior Leverage Ratio, and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio calculated in accordance with the agreement were 1.40, 1.40 and 3.30, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in full compliance with all debt covenant requirements. The Credit Agreement provides for “Events of Default” that, unless waived, can or will lead to acceleration of obligations upon the occurrence, continuation and/or notice, as applicable, of specified events typical of senior facilities of this kind. These include (a) failures to pay interest or principal on loans, (b) misrepresentations, (c) failures to observe covenants, (d) cross defaults of other indebtedness in excess of $20.0 million, (e) uninsured and unsatisfied judgments in excess of $20.0 million or certain orders or injunctions, (f) bankruptcy and insolvency events, (g) events leading to aggregate liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) in excess of $20.0 million, (h) changes of control, (i) invalidity of credit support /security agreements, and (i) certain disadvantageous changes in Credit Agreement debt compared to subordinated debt. Fees and expenses incurred with the amended and restated Credit Agreement were approximately $1.5 million. This amount was recorded as deferred financing costs and will be amortized, along with the residual value of the initial fees and expenses incurred in 2010, over the new term of the Credit Agreement using the effective interest method. In addition, in connection with the amendment and restatement of the Credit Agreement, the Company charged to earnings approximately $0.3 million of accelerated deferred financing charges in the fourth quarter of 2012. As of December 31, 2013, $96.0 million was outstanding under the Term Loan and $67.0 million was outstanding under the revolving line of credit, both of which approximate fair value because they have a floating interest rate, Level 2 input within the fair value hierarchy, with total availability at $147.1 million, taking into account $2.3 million in face amount of letters of credit issued under the sub-facility. The current weighted average interest rate for all debt is 2.4%. Simultaneously with initiating the new senior facility, Innophos entered into an interest rate swap, swapping the LIBOR exposure on $100.0 million of floating rate debt under the new senior facility to a fixed rate to maturity obligation of 0.9475% plus the applicable margin on the debt expiring in December 2017. This interest rate swap has been designated as a cashflow hedge (Level 2) with the changes in value recorded through other comprehensive income. The fair value of this interest rate swap is an asset of approximately $1.2 million as of December 31, 2013. We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt to the extent practicable consistent with our credit status. Innophos and its subsidiaries and affiliates may from time to time seek to acquire or otherwise retire outstanding debt through privately negotiated transactions, exchanges or otherwise. Debt repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, Company liquidity requirements, restrictive financial covenants and other factors applicable at the time. The amounts involved may be material. Total interest paid by the Company for all indebtedness for 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $4,622, $5,432 and $6,046. Page 56 of 82 Interest expense, net consists of the following: Interest expense Deferred financing cost Interest income Less: amount capitalized for capital projects Total interest expense, net 10. Other Long-Term Liabilities: Other long-term liabilities consist of the following: $ $ Deferred income taxes Pension and post retirement liabilities Environmental liabilities Other liabilities Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2013 $ 5,271 559 (1,049) (355) 4,426 $ $ 5,419 884 (65) (261) 5,977 $ 5,802 608 (238) (446) 5,726 2013 2012 $ $ 32,110 11,175 1,100 1,523 45,908 $ $ 20,803 12,118 1,100 1,713 35,734 11. Stockholders’ Equity / Stock-Based Compensation: Our compensation programs include share-based payments. The primary share-based awards and their general terms and conditions currently in effect are as follows: • Restricted stock grants, which entitle the holder to receive, at the end of each vesting term, a specified number of shares of the Company's common stock, and which also entitle the holder to receive dividends paid on such grants throughout the vesting period. Compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period, generally three years, and accelerated for those employees that are retirement eligible during the vesting period. • • Stock options, which entitle the holder to purchase, after the end of a vesting term, a specified number of shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price per share set equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The stock options generally vest annually over three years with a ten year term from date of grant. Performance share awards which entitle the holder to receive, at the end of a vesting term, a number of shares of the Company’s common stock, within a range of shares from zero to a specified maximum (generally 200%), calculated using a combination of performance indicators as defined solely by reference to the Company’s own activities. The performance shares generally vest at the end of a three year performance cycle and the number of shares distributable depends on the extent to which the Company attains pre-established performance goals. Amounts equivalent to dividends will accrue over the performance period and are paid on performance share awards when vested and distributed. • Annual stock retainer grants, which entitle independent members of the Board of Directors to receive a number of shares of the Company’s common stock, which immediately vest, equal to a fixed retainer value. Page 57 of 82 The following table summarizes the components of stock-based compensation expense, all of which has been classified as selling, general and administrative expense: Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2013 Stock options Restricted stock Performance shares Stock grants Total stock-based compensation expense $ $ 1,002 676 196 300 2,174 $ $ $ 1,436 236 (120) 360 1,912 $ 1,601 6 4,343 300 6,250 A summary of restricted stock activity during the three years ended December 31, 2013, is presented below: Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares $ $ 6,700 $ — (6,178) (522) — — 14,370 — (110) 14,260 $ 14,260 $ 25,853 (1,932) (5,154) 33,027 $ 13.14 — 13.08 13.79 — — 50.12 — 50.12 50.12 50.12 54.59 50.12 52.65 53.22 Outstanding at January 1, 2011 Granted Released Forfeited / Surrendered Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Outstanding at January 1, 2012 Granted Released Forfeited / Surrendered Outstanding at December 31, 2012 Outstanding at January 1, 2013 Granted Released Forfeited / Surrendered Outstanding at December 31, 2013 Page 58 of 82 A summary of stock option activity during the three years ended December 31, 2013, is presented below: Number of Options Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Outstanding at January 1, 2011 Granted Forfeited / Surrendered Exercised Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Exercisable at December 31, 2011 Outstanding at January 1, 2012 Granted Forfeited / Surrendered Exercised Outstanding at December 31, 2012 Exercisable at December 31, 2012 Outstanding at January 1, 2013 Granted Forfeited / Surrendered Exercised Outstanding at December 31, 2013 Exercisable at December 31, 2013 920,966 95,920 (25,531) (91,213) 900,142 620,677 900,142 39,683 (37,238) (181,165) 721,422 545,829 721,422 63,580 (23,001) (92,977) 669,024 556,747 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 17.14 20.41 19.99 15.77 39.67 17.18 13.10 18.55 14.45 18.55 50.12 16.62 9.34 22.69 17.92 22.69 54.59 39.69 20.63 25.34 20.60 The fair value of the options granted during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model were as follows: Non-qualified stock options Expected volatility Dividend yield Risk-free interest rate Expected term Weighted average grant date fair value of stock options Year Ended December 31, 2013 50.4 % 2.8 % 1.0 % 6 Year Ended December 31, 2012 53.2 % 2.4 % 1.3 % 6 Year Ended December 31, 2011 54.4% 2.3% 2.3% 6 $ 19.99 $ 20.41 $ 17.14 Prior to 2009, since Innophos Holdings, Inc. was a newly public entity and has limited historical data on the price of its publicly traded shares, the expected volatility for the valuation of its stock options and performance shares was based solely on peer group historical volatility data equaling the expected term. Since 2009, the Company has chosen a blended volatility which consists of 50% historical volatility average of a peer group and 50% historical volatility of Innophos. The expected term for the stock options is based on the simplified method since the Company has limited data on the exercises of stock options. These stock options qualify as “plain vanilla” stock options in accordance with SAB 110. The dividend yield is the expected annual dividend payments divided by the average stock price up to the date of grant. The risk-free interest rates are derived from the U.S. Treasury securities in effect on the date of grant whose maturity period equals the options expected term. The Company applies an expected forfeiture rate to stock-based compensation expense. The estimate of the forfeiture rate is based primarily upon historical experience of employee turnover. As actual forfeitures become known, stock-based compensation expense is adjusted accordingly. Page 59 of 82 A summary of performance share activity is presented below: Outstanding at January 1, 2011 Granted (at targeted return on invested capital) Forfeited Vested Adjustment to estimate of shares to be earned Outstanding at December 31, 2011 Outstanding at January 1, 2012 Granted (at targeted return on invested capital) Forfeited Vested Adjustment to estimate of shares to be earned Outstanding at December 31, 2012 Outstanding at January 1, 2013 Granted (at targeted return on invested capital) Forfeited Vested Adjustment to estimate of shares to be earned Outstanding at December 31, 2013 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares $ 268,834 50,970 — (189,534 ) 79,300 209,570 209,570 43,106 — $ $ (138,781 ) (113,895 ) $ $ — — 43,091 (4,854 ) — (25,848 ) 12,389 $ 17.92 39.67 — 14.57 25.68 29.08 29.08 50.12 — 25.68 41.19 — — 54.59 54.59 — 54.59 54.59 The total intrinsic value of options exercised and stock grants during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $4.7 million, $8.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2013 was $15.6 million and $15.6 million, respectively. The total remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to share- based payments is as follows: Unrecognized Compensation Expense Amount Weighted-average years to be recognized Restricted Stock Stock Options Performance Based $ 1,007 $ 1.9 1,334 $ 1.1 480 2.0 During 2011 the Board of Directors authorized a repurchase program for Company common stock of up to $50 million. Under the program, shares will be repurchased from time to time at management’s discretion, either through open market transactions, block purchases, private transactions or other means and will be funded through existing liquidity and cash from operations. A five year time limit has been set for the expiration of the program as initially structured. The timing of repurchases and the exact number of shares of common stock to be purchased will depend upon market conditions and other factors. However, annual repurchase amounts are expected at a minimum to be sufficient to reduce significantly, or eliminate, earnings per share dilution caused by shares issued upon the exercise of stock options and in connection with other equity based compensation plans. Treasury stock is recognized at the cost to reacquire the shares. As of December 31, 2013, there is a balance of $29.5 million remaining under the repurchase program. 12. Earnings per share (EPS) The Company accounts for earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260 and related guidance, which requires two calculations of earnings per share (EPS) to be disclosed: basic EPS and diluted EPS. Under ASC Subtopic 260-10-45, as of January 1, 2009 unvested awards of share-based payments with rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents, such as our restricted stock, are considered participating securities for purposes of calculating EPS. Under the two-class method, a portion Page 60 of 82 of net income is allocated to these participating securities and therefore is excluded from the calculation of EPS allocated to common stock, as shown in the table below. The numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share is net earnings attributable to shareholders reduced by dividends attributable to unvested shares. The denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period. The denominator for diluted earnings per share is weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of dilutive outstanding stock options, performance share awards and restricted stock awards. The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average basic number of common shares outstanding to the diluted number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding and the calculation of earnings per share using the two- class method: Net income Less: earnings attributable to unvested shares Net income available to common shareholders Weighted average number of common and potential common shares outstanding: Basic number of common shares outstanding Dilutive effect of stock equivalents Diluted number of weighted average common shares outstanding Earnings per common share: Earnings per common share—Basic Earnings per common share—Diluted Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2013 49,506 (64) 74,190 (40) $ 49,442 $ 74,150 $ 86,522 — 86,522 21,933,843 412,137 22,345,980 21,795,155 680,726 22,475,881 21,694,453 884,114 22,578,567 $ $ 2.25 2.21 $ $ 3.40 3.30 $ $ 3.99 3.83 Total outstanding options, performance share awards and unvested restricted stock not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive are 330,420, 40,696 and 225,848 for the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Page 61 of 82 13. Dividends The following is the dividend activity for 2013, 2012 and 2011: Dividends declared – per share Dividends declared – aggregate Dividends paid – per share Dividends paid – aggregate Dividends declared – per share Dividends declared – aggregate Dividends paid – per share Dividends paid – aggregate Dividends declared – per share Dividends declared – aggregate Dividends paid – per share Dividends paid – aggregate $ $ $ March 31 June 30 $ 0.35 7,641 0.35 7,641 0.35 7,685 0.35 7,685 March 31 June 30 $ 2013 Quarters ended September 30 0.35 7,694 0.35 7,694 2012 Quarters ended September 30 $ December 31 0.40 8,817 0.40 8,817 $ 0.27 5,885 0.25 5,405 $ 0.27 5,891 0.27 5,885 — $ — 0.27 5,891 December 31 0.35 7,629 0.35 7,629 March 31 June 30 $ 0.25 5,426 0.17 3,649 0.25 5,442 0.25 5,426 $ 2011 Quarters ended September 30 0.25 5,404.00 0.25 5,442 $ December 31 0.25 5,405 0.25 5,404 Total 1.45 31,837 1.45 31,837 Total 0.89 19,405 1.14 24,810 Total 1.00 21,677 0.92 19,921 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ We are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are dependent upon cash dividends, distributions and other transfers from our subsidiaries, most directly Innophos, Inc., our primary operating subsidiary, and Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc., its parent, to make dividend payments on our Common Stock. 14. Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits: Innophos maintains both noncontributory defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that together cover substantially all U.S. and Canadian employees. In the United States, salaried and hourly employees are covered by a defined contribution plan with a 401(k) feature. The plan provides for employee contributions, company matching contributions, and an age-weighted annual company contribution to eligible employees. Union-represented hourly employees, at our Nashville site, are covered by a traditional defined benefit plan providing benefits based on years of service and final average pay. On April 26, 2007, the Company and the Union for the hourly employees at our Nashville facility agreed that it would freeze its defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) as of August 1, 2007. The accrual of additional benefits or increase in the current level of benefits under the Plan ceased as of August 1, 2007, after which the Nashville union employees now participate in the Company’s existing noncontributory defined contribution benefit plan. All plans were established by Innophos in 2004. In Canada, salaried employees are covered by defined contribution plans which provide for company contributions as a percent of pay, employee contributions, and company matching contributions. Union-represented hourly employees are covered by a defined benefit plan providing benefits based on a negotiated benefit level and years of service. The defined contribution plans were established by the Company in 2004; the defined benefit plan for union-represented hourly employees is a continuation of the Rhodia Canada Inc.’s pension plan for its Port Maitland union employees, which was included in the acquisition of the Phosphates Business from Rhodia on August 13, 2004. Innophos also has other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all of its U.S. and Canadian employees. Certain employee groups covered under the plans do not receive benefits post-age 65. In the United States, the health care plans are contributory with participants’ contributions adjusted annually, and limits on the company’s share of the costs; the life Page 62 of 82 insurance plans are noncontributory. The effects of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, or the Act, are not significant. In Canada, the plans are non-contributory. Innophos uses a December 31 measurement date for all of its plans. For the purposes of the following schedules, beginning of the year is January 1. The weighted average discount rate at the measurement dates for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and the post-retirement benefit plans is developed using a spot interest yield curve based upon a broad population of corporate bonds rated AA or higher, adjusted to match the duration of each plan’s projected benefit payment stream. The expected return is based on a specific asset mix, active management, rebalancing among diversified asset classes within the portfolio, and a consistent underlying inflation assumption to calculate the appropriate long-term expected investment return. As a sensitivity measure, the effect of a 25 basis-point decrease in our discount rate assumption would increase our net periodic benefit cost for our pension and post-retirement plans by approximately $81. A 1% decrease in our expected rate of return on plan assets would increase our pension plan expense by $178. The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), or AOCI, for all plans that are expected to be amortized as components of net periodic benefit cost (benefit) during 2013 are as follows: Prior service cost Net actuarial loss Transition obligation Pension $ Other Benefits Total $ 97 61 — $ — 15 29 97 76 29 The changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss during 2013 and 2012 are as follows: Change in accumulated other comprehensive income Amortization of net gain Amortization of prior service cost / transition obligation Net (gain) loss Total change in accumulated other comprehensive income Deferred taxes Net amount recognized Pension Benefits Other Benefits Total 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 $ (366) $ (276) $ (36) $ (47) $ (402) $ (323) (101) (2,905) (104) 1,243 (29) (948) 37 546 536 (130) (3,853) (4,385) 1,359 (3,026) $ (67) 1,789 1,399 (572) 827 (1,013) 367 (241) (646) $ 295 $ (3,372) 992 (2,380) $ $ 863 (331) 532 $ Page 63 of 82 U.S. Plans Obligations and Funded Status—U.S. Plans At December 31 Accumulated benefit obligation Change in projected benefit obligation Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (gain) loss Benefits paid Projected benefit obligation at end of year Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Benefits paid Fair value of plan assets at end of year Funded status of the plan Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets Noncurrent assets Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Net amounts recognized Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income Prior service (credit) cost Net actuarial loss (gain) Total amount recognized Deferred taxes Net amount recognized $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2013 2012 2013 2012 2,459 $ 2,719 $ 3,991 $ 4,435 2,719 $ 2,461 $ — 105 (329) (36) — 110 178 (30) 2,459 $ 2,719 $ 1,561 $ 1,369 $ 212 135 52 170 (36) (30) 1,872 $ 1,561 $ (587) $ (1,158) $ $ 4,435 337 149 (803) (127) 3,991 $ $ — — 127 (127) — (3,991) $ $ — $ — — $ — $ — (217) (587) (1,158) (3,774) (587) $ (1,158) $ (3,991) $ — $ — $ 248 248 $ (94) 154 728 728 $ (277) 451 $ — (676) (676) $ 257 (419) 3,404 327 161 678 (135) 4,435 — — 135 (135) — (4,435) — (221) (4,214) (4,435) — 126 126 (48) 78 Page 64 of 82 $ $ Components of net periodic benefit cost Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of: Prior service cost Actuarial loss (gain) Net periodic benefit cost Weighted average assumptions for balance sheet liability at end of year Discount rate Expected long-term rate of return Rate of compensation increase Weighted average assumptions for net periodic benefit cost at beginning of year Discount rate Expected long-term rate of return Rate of compensation increase Estimated Future Benefit Payments Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal Years 2019-2023 Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 $ — 105 (111) — 110 (110) — 50 44 $ — 14 14 $ $ — $ $ 337 149 — — — 327 161 — (67) — 421 $ $ 284 140 — 132 (78 ) 478 $ 486 $ 111 (77 ) — — 34 5.00% 6.30% NA 4.00% 6.35% NA 4.50% 6.72% 4.50% 3.75% 4.25% NA NA NA NA 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.00% 6.35% NA 4.50% 6.72% NA 5.25% 5.00% 3.75% 4.25% 5.00% NA NA NA NA 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Pension Benefits $ 79 99 111 128 138 788 Other Benefits 217 $ 289 361 394 414 1,856 Innophos expects to contribute approximately $0.2 million to its U.S. defined benefit pension plan in 2014. The estimated actuarial loss, prior service cost, and transition obligation (asset) for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost during the 2014 fiscal year are $1, $0 and $0, respectively. The estimated actuarial gain, prior service cost, and transition obligation (asset) for the postretirement plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost during the 2014 fiscal year are $40, $0 and $0, respectively. Assumed health care cost trend rates on the U.S. plans do not have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans as a result of limits on the Company’s share of the cost. Page 65 of 82 Plan Assets The investment policy for the Company’s defined benefit pension plan is designed to achieve long-term objectives of return, while mitigating against downside risk and considering expected cash flow. Innophos, Inc.’s defined benefit pension plan invests in mutual funds and commercial paper and the weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2013 and 2012 by asset category are as follows: Asset Category Equity securities Fixed income securities Total Plan Assets at December 31 2013 2012 56.3 % 43.7 100.0 % 39.5% 60.5 100.0% The fair values of Innophos, Inc.’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2013 by asset category are as follows: Equity securities Fixed income securities Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 $ $ 1,053 819 1,872 $ $ 1,053 819 1,872 $ $ — — — $ $ — — — The Pension Committee has promulgated a Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures based on the “prudent person portfolio approach” to ensure investment and administration of the assets of the Plan within the parameters set out in the Ontario Pension Benefits Act and the Regulations hereunder. Investment managers appointed by the Plan are directed to achieve a satisfactory return through a diversified portfolio consistent with acceptable risks and prudent management. In accordance with the investment and risk philosophy of the Committee, a target asset mix of 60% equities and 40% fixed income instruments has been established. Investment weightings and results are tested regularly against appropriate benchmark portfolios. Defined Contribution Plan—U.S. Innophos Inc.’s expense for the defined contribution plan was $3.2 million, $3.3 million and $3.2 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Page 66 of 82 Canadian Plans Obligations and Funded Status—Canadian Plans at December 31 Accumulated benefit obligation Projected change in benefit obligation Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (gain) loss Benefits paid Exchange rate changes Projected benefit obligation at end of year Change in plan assets Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Benefits paid Exchange rate changes Fair value of plan assets at end of year Funded status of the plan Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets Noncurrent assets Current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities Net amounts recognized Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income Net transition obligation Prior service cost Net actuarial loss Total amount recognized Deferred taxes Net amount recognized $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2013 2012 2013 2012 12,256 $ 13,322 $ 1,803 $ 1,905 13,322 $ 11,657 $ 348 557 (643) (468) (860) 339 602 878 (392) 238 12,256 $ 13,322 $ 15,085 $ 13,460 $ 2,432 718 (468) (1,084) 16,683 4,427 $ $ 939 804 (392) 274 15,085 1,763 $ $ $ 1,905 77 81 (107) (29) (124) 1,803 $ $ — — 29 (29) — — (1,803) $ $ 4,427 $ 1,763 $ — — — — $ — (44) (1,759) 4,427 $ 1,763 $ (1,803) $ — $ — $ 97 2,863 209 5,645 2,960 $ 5,854 $ (740) (1,550) 2,220 4,304 $ $ 157 — 285 442 (111) 331 1,876 81 99 (150) (39) 38 1,905 — — 39 (39) — — (1,905) — (30) (1,875) (1,905) 200 — 452 652 (173) 479 Page 67 of 82 Components of net periodic benefit cost Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of: Actuarial loss Prior service cost Net transition obligation Net periodic benefit cost Weighted average assumptions for balance sheet liability at end of year Discount rate Rate of compensation increase Weighted average assumptions for net periodic benefit cost at end of year Discount rate Expected long-term rate of return Rate of compensation increase Accrued health care cost trend rates at end of year Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (initial rate) Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (ultimate rate) Year that the rate reaches the ultimate rate Pension Benefits Other Benefits 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 $ $ $ 348 557 (900) 339 602 (944) $ 280 575 (964) $ 77 81 — 316 101 — 422 $ $ 261 104 — 362 165 107 — $ 163 $ 36 — 29 223 $ 81 99 — 47 — 30 257 $ $ 68 95 — 40 — 31 234 4.75% 4.25% 5.50% 4.75% 4.25% 5.00% NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.25% 6.00% NA 5.00% 6.50% NA 5.50% 7.00% NA 4.25% 5.00% 5.50% NA NA NA NA NA NA 9% 10% 10% 5% 2027 5% 2019 5% 2019 Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one- percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects: Effect of a change in the assumed rate of increase in health benefit costs Effect of a 1% increase on: Total of service cost and interest cost Postretirement benefit obligation Effect of a 1% decrease on: Total of service cost and interest cost Postretirement benefit obligation Other Benefits 2013 2012 $ $ $ $ 26 262 $ $ (21) $ (212) $ 25 281 (20) (226) The estimated net actuarial loss, prior service cost, and transition obligation (asset) for all defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost during the 2014 fiscal year are $102, $97 and $0, respectively. The estimated actuarial loss, prior service cost, and transition obligation (asset) for the postretirement plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost during the 2014 fiscal year are $15, $0 and $29, respectively. Page 68 of 82 Plan Assets Innophos Canada Inc.’s pension plan invests in mutual funds and the weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2013 and 2012 by asset category are as follows: Asset Category Equity securities Debt securities Other (a) Total 2013 2012 63.7 % 33.2 3.1 100.0 % 60.5% 35.5 4.0 100.0% The fair values of Innophos Canada, Inc.’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2013 by asset category are as follows: Equity securities Fixed income securities Other (a) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 $ $ 10,620 5,548 515 16,683 $ 10,620 $ — 515 11,135 $ $ — 5,548 — 5,548 $ $ — — — — (a) Primarily cash and cash equivalents. The Pension Committee has promulgated a Statement of Investment Policies and Procedures based on the “prudent person portfolio approach” to ensure investment and administration of the assets of the Plan within the parameters set out in the Ontario Pension Benefits Act and the Regulations hereunder. Investment managers appointed by the Plan are directed to achieve a satisfactory return through a diversified portfolio consistent with acceptable risks and prudent management. In accordance with the investment and risk philosophy of the Committee, a target asset mix of 60% equities and 40% fixed income instruments has been established. Investment weightings and results are tested regularly against appropriate benchmark portfolios. Cash Flows Contributions Innophos Canada, Inc. contributed $0.7 million to its pension plan in 2013. Estimated Future Benefit Payments The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid: Estimated Future Benefit Payments Fiscal 2014 Fiscal 2015 Fiscal 2016 Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2018 Fiscal Years 2019-2023 Pension Benefits $ 420 475 496 523 572 3,382 Other Benefits 44 $ 54 70 82 88 609 Innophos plans to contribute approximately $0.9 million to its Canadian pension plan in 2014. Defined Contribution Plans—Canada Innophos Canada Inc.’s expense for the defined contribution plans was approximately $0.1 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Page 69 of 82 Mexico In accordance with Mexican labor law, a Mexican employee is entitled to certain post employment payments after reaching fifteen years of service. In addition, Mexican employees also participate in a statutory profit sharing program based on 10% of adjusted taxable income. 15. Income Taxes: A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory rate and income taxes follows: 2013 Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 US Canada/Mexico/Europe/Asia Total Current income taxes Deferred income taxes Total Income before income taxes $ 61,206 15,041 $ 76,247 Income tax expense $ 21,906 4,835 $ 26,741 $ 25,257 1,484 $ 26,741 Income before income taxes $ 84,815 21,158 $ 105,973 Income tax expense/ (benefit) $ 25,973 5,810 $ 31,783 $ 31,616 167 $ 31,783 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 79,250 51,161 $ 130,411 Income tax expense/ (benefit) $ 30,831 13,058 $ 43,889 $ 38,510 5,379 $ 43,889 Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 2013 Income tax expense at the U.S. statutory rate State income taxes Domestic manufacturing deduction Deferred tax true-up Uncertain tax positions CNA matter related non-taxable reimbursement Foreign tax rate differential Change in valuation allowance Permanent book / tax differences Provision for income taxes $ $ 26,688 3,087 (1,639) (1,602) 1,401 (329) (1,161) 555 (259) $ 26,741 $ Net deferred tax assets were reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as follows: $ 37,091 2,458 (1,912) — 715 (3,101) (1,233) (2,237) 2 31,783 $ 45,645 2,207 (1,741) — — 850 (2,586) — (486) 43,889 Net current deferred tax assets Net noncurrent deferred tax assets Net current deferred tax liabilities Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) Year Ended December 31, 2012 2013 $ $ $ 21,589 — — (32,110) (10,521) $ 12,917 — — (20,803) (7,886) Page 70 of 82 The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets/ (liabilities) were as follows: Deferred tax assets: Inventories Accrued liabilities Tax losses Total deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities: Gain on bond retirement Intangibles Fixed assets Total deferred tax liabilities Total valuation allowances Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) Year Ended December 31, 2012 2013 $ $ $ 5,443 10,846 10,296 26,585 (1,338) (11,172) (20,010) (32,520) (4,586) (10,521) $ 3,606 13,361 5,823 22,790 (1,344) (5,136) (20,165) (26,645) (4,031) (7,886) A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: Gross unrecognized tax benefits at January 1 Additions for tax positions of prior years Reductions for tax positions of prior years Reductions due to settlements Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations Gross unrecognized tax benefits at December 31 Year Ended December 31, 2013 2012 2011 $ $ 1,100 1,535 — — — 2,635 $ — 1,100 — — — 1,100 Net uncertain tax benefits, that if recognized would impact the effective tax rate, at December 31 $ 2,116 $ 715 $ — — — — — — — The U.S. operations do not have any Federal tax loss carry forwards as of December 31, 2013. The Company realized tax benefits of $2,849 and $3,931 from stock options exercised in 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company maintained a $4.6 million and $4.0 million valuation allowance at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily related to certain state net operating loss carryforwards as it is more likely than not that these tax benefits will not be realized. The net operating losses will expire in the years 2014 through 2026. As of December 31, 2013, taxes have not been provided on approximately $210.2 million of accumulated foreign unremitted earnings that are expected to remain invested indefinitely. Due to complexities in the tax laws and the assumptions that would have to be made, it is not practicable to estimate the amounts of income taxes that would have to be provided. Business is conducted in various countries throughout the world and is subject to tax in numerous jurisdictions. A significant number of tax returns are filed and subject to examination by various federal, state and local tax authorities. Tax examinations are often complex, as tax authorities may disagree with the treatment of items reported requiring several years to resolve. As such, the Company maintains liabilities for possible assessments by tax authorities resulting from known tax exposures for uncertain income tax positions. The Company’s policy is to accrue associated penalties in selling, general and administrative expenses and to accrue interest in net interest expense. Currently, the Company is under examination, or has been contacted for examination on income tax returns for the years 2006 through 2012. In addition, Innophos Canada, Inc. was assessed approximately $4.0 million for the tax years 2006, 2007, and 2008 by the Canadian tax authorities. In April 2012, the Page 71 of 82 Company filed a response to the Canadian tax authorities for the above tax matter disputing the full assessment and a follow up response on October 15, 2013. The Company believes that its tax position is more likely than not to be sustained and has not recorded a charge for this tax matter. The Company estimates the liability for unrecognized tax benefits may decrease approximately $1.2 million during the next twelve months as a result of possible settlements of income tax authority examinations. The Company has recorded $0.7 million of interest and penalties in the statement of financial position. Other than the items mentioned above, as of December 31, 2013, no significant adjustments have been proposed to the Company's tax positions and the Company currently does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in a material change to its financial position during the next twelve months. Income taxes paid (net of refunds) were $9,402, $45,080 and $27,164 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 16. Commitments and Contingencies: Leases Under agreements expiring through 2020, the Company leases railcars and other equipment under various operating leases. Rental expense for 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $6,324, $6,172 and $5,443, respectively. Minimum annual rentals for all operating leases are: Year Ending 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Lease Payments $ 5,389 5,353 4,769 3,290 2,981 10,086 Purchase Commitments and Supplier Concentration The Company has multiple raw material supply contracts one of which with an initial term through 2018 with an automatic five year renewal term at prices established annually based on a formula. The minimum annual purchase obligation for several of these raw material supply contracts, at current prices, approximates $123.8 million for 2014. Our business activities depend on long-term or renewable contracts to supply materials or products. In particular, we rely to a significant degree on single-source supply contracts and some of these contractual relationships may be with a relatively limited number of suppliers. Although most of our supplier relationships are typically the result of multiple contractual arrangements of varying terms, in any given year, one or more of these contracts may come up for renewal. In addition, from time to time, we enter into toll manufacturing agreements or other arrangements to produce minimum quantities of product for a certain duration. If we experience delays in delivering contracted production, we may be subject to contractual liabilities to the buyers to whom we have promised the products. Environmental The Company's operations are subject to extensive and changing federal and state environmental laws and regulations. The Company's manufacturing sites have an extended history of industrial use, and soil and groundwater contamination have or may have occurred in the past and might occur or be discovered in the future. Environmental efforts are difficult to assess for numerous reasons, including the discovery of new remedial sites, discovery of new information and scarcity of reliable information pertaining to certain sites, improvements in technology, changes in environmental laws and regulations, numerous possible remedial techniques and solutions, difficulty in assessing the involvement of and the financial capability of other potentially responsible parties and the extended time periods over which remediation occurs. Other than the items listed below, the Company is not aware of material environmental liabilities which are probable and estimable. As the Company's environmental contingencies are more clearly determined, it is reasonably possible that amounts may need to be accrued. However, management does not believe, based on current information, that environmental remediation requirements will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Page 72 of 82 Future environmental spending is probable at our site in Nashville, TN, the eastern portion of which had been used historically as a landfill, and a western parcel previously acquired from a third party, which reportedly had housed, but no longer does, a fertilizer and pesticide manufacturing facility. We have an estimated liability with a range of $0.9-$1.2 million. The remedial action plan for that site has yet to be finalized, and as such, the Company has recorded a liability, which represents the Company's best estimate, of $1.1 million as of December 31, 2013. Litigation 2008 RCRA Civil Enforcement - Geismar, Louisiana plant Following several inspections by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, at our Geismar, LA purified phosphoric acid, or PPA, plant and related submissions we made to support claimed exemptions from the federal Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA, in March 2008, EPA referred our case to the Department of Justice, or DOJ, for civil enforcement. Although no citations were ever issued or formal proceedings instituted, the agencies claim we violate RCRA by failing to manage appropriately two materials that DOJ/EPA alleges are hazardous wastes. Those materials are: (i) Filter Material from an enclosed intermediate filtration step to further process green phosphoric acid we receive as raw material via pipeline from the adjacent site operated by an affiliate of Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, or PCS; and (ii) Raffinate, a co- product we return to PCS under a long-term contract we have with PCS. Since referral of the case to DOJ, we and PCS have engaged in periodic discussions with DOJ/EPA and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, or LDEQ, or collectively the Government Parties, in order to resolve the matter. In addition to asserting that the two materials in question are not hazardous wastes, we have also sought to demonstrate that both the nature and character of the materials as well as their use, handling and disposition were detailed in a solid waste permit amendment application filed in 1989 by PCS's predecessor, when our plant was first constructed, and approved by the LDEQ under the state RCRA program. In the course of discussions with the Government Parties, the DOJ/EPA has required that we undertake, as an interim measure, the construction of a new filter unit that would replace the existing closed system and allow the removal and separate handling of the Filter Material. We built that unit, which is now in operation. In an attempt to address the remaining concerns of the Government Parties, we and PCS undertook joint efforts to explore possible technical solutions to the issue of Raffinate treatment. Based upon work so far, there appears to be at least one technically viable approach, namely that of “deep well injection,” which we believe is acceptable to regulators as part of a negotiated solution among the parties. Although we cannot give assurances as to the future course or ultimate outcome of ongoing negotiations, including whether litigation may ultimately ensue, we believe, based on our appreciation of the current state of the proceedings, that deep well injection is likely to be employed as the technologically acceptable approach for Raffinate and that we will not be asked to contribute substantially to the cost of the deep well to be specified by the Government Parties in an anticipated consent decree for settlement of this enforcement matter. However, in negotiated settlements leading to consent decrees with the Governmental Parties, it is also common for penalties relating to previous “non-compliance” to be assessed and, in that connection, we have been advised by the Governmental Parties that they expect to seek penalties against both PCS and us in this case. Although we have argued and made submissions to the effect that for purposes of settlement penalties there is no basis for any substantial penalty to be levied against us, nevertheless, we can give no assurance as to that outcome, or if a penalty is initially assessed as to its amount, or whether it will be necessary for us to oppose or seek indemnity for the assessment by further litigation. As a result, we have concluded that the contingent liability arising from compliance costs in this matter remains, as we have previously disclosed, neither remote nor probable, but reasonably possible. Other Legal Matters In March 2008, Sudamfos S.A., or Sudamfos, an Argentine phosphate producer, filed an arbitration before the ICC International Court of Arbitration, Paris, France, concerning an alleged agreement for our Mexicana subsidiary, Mexicana, to sell it 12,500 metric tons of phosphoric acid, but subsequently withdrew the proceeding. In October 2008, Mexicana filed suit in Mexico against Sudamfos to collect approximately $1.2 million representing the contract price for prior deliveries of acid for which Sudamfos had refused to pay. In October 2009, Sudamfos answered the suit and counterclaimed for $3.0 million based upon the agreement originally alleged in the arbitration. In subsequent proceedings including available appeals, Mexicana's claim was sustained and Sudamfos' counterclaim was denied. Mexicana has now begun formal collection proceedings against Sudamfos. Page 73 of 82 Innophos, Inc. has been assessed approximately $1.2 million of sales/use taxes by the State of Louisiana and Ascension Parish. This tax assessment covers certain raw materials used in the production of Phosphoric Acid. The Company is contesting both tax assessments. This assessment covers periods 2004 to 2010 for the Parish and 2007 to 2010 for the State. We have concluded that the contingent liability arising from this matter is neither remote nor probable, but reasonably possible. In addition, we are party to legal proceedings and contractual disputes that arise in the ordinary course of our business. Except as to the matters specifically discussed, management believes that these matters represent remote liabilities. However, these matters cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and/or cash flows. 17. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component: Balance at December 31, 2011 Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) Balance at December 31, 2012 Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) Balance at December 31, 2013 Pension and Other Postretirement Adjustments Changes in Fair Value of Effective Cash Flow Hedges Total $ $ (4,486) $ (827) — (827) (5,313) 3,026 — 3,026 (2,287) $ (509) $ (114) — (114) (623) 1,345 — 1,345 722 $ (4,995) (941) — (941) (5,936) 4,371 — 4,371 (1,565) 18. Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risks: The Company believes that its concentration of credit risk related to trade accounts receivable is limited since these receivables are spread among a number of customers and are geographically dispersed. The ten largest customers accounted for 30%, 35% and 30%, respectively, of net sales for 2013, 2012 and 2011. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales in the last three years. 19. Valuation Allowances: Valuation allowances as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the changes in the valuation allowances for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows: Balance, January 1, 2013 Charged/ (credited) to costs and expenses Deductions (Bad debts) (Credited) to Goodwill Deferred taxes valuation allowances $ 4,031 $ 555 $ — $ — Deferred taxes valuation allowances $ 6,549 $ (2,518) $ — $ — Balance, January 1, 2012 Charged/ (credited) to costs and expenses Deductions (Bad debts) (Credited) to Goodwill Deferred taxes valuation allowances $ 5,860 $ 689 $ — $ — Balance, January 1, 2011 Charged/ (credited) to costs and expenses Deductions (Bad debts) (Credited) to Goodwill Balance, December 31, 2013 $ 4,586 Balance, December 31, 2012 $ 4,031 Balance, December 31, 2011 $ 6,549 Page 74 of 82 20. Segment Reporting: The company discloses certain financial and supplementary information about its reportable segments, revenue by products and revenues by geographic area. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, in order to decide how to allocate resources and assess performance. The primary performance indicators for the chief operating decision maker are sales and operating income, with sales on a ship-from basis. All references to sales in this Form 10-K, either on a ship-from or ship- to basis, are on the same basis of revenue recognition and are recognized when title and risk of loss passes to the customer, which occurs either upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the agreed sales terms with customers. The Company's reportable segments reflect the core businesses in which Innophos operates and how it is managed. The Company reports its core specialty phosphates business separately from granular triple super-phosphate, or GTSP, and other non-specialty phosphate products (GTSP & Other). Kelatron, AMT, Triarco and CMI are included in the Specialty Phosphates US & Canada segment and in the Specialty Ingredients product line. Specialty Phosphates consists of the products lines Specialty Ingredients, Food & Technical Grade PPA, and STPP & Detergent Grade PPA. GTSP & Other includes fertilizer co- product GTSP and other non-specialty phosphate products. For the year ended December 31, 2013 Sales Intersegment sales Total sales Operating income (a) (b) Depreciation and amortization expense Other data Capital expenditures Long-lived assets Total assets Reconciliation of total assets to reported assets Total assets Eliminations Reported assets (c) For the year ended December 31, 2012 Sales Intersegment sales Total sales Operating income (a) (b) Depreciation and amortization expense Other data Capital expenditures Long-lived assets Total assets Reconciliation of total assets to reported assets Total assets Eliminations Reported assets (c) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Specialty Phosphates US & Canada 607,578 2,910 610,488 76,802 26,537 11,084 123,893 720,251 Specialty Phosphates US & Canada 569,816 1,779 571,595 86,002 23,214 11,068 130,869 714,753 $ $ $ $ $ $ 720,251 (255,928) 464,323 $ $ 714,753 (260,559) 454,194 $ $ Specialty Phosphates Mexico GTSP & Other $ 169,851 $ 66,700 $ 55,359 225,210 308 67,008 11,677 7,200 $ $ (4,609) 1,724 $ 22,237 $ 94 $ 76,698 291,264 1,394 2,670 291,264 $ 2,670 $ (13,080) — 278,184 $ 2,670 $ Eliminations — (58,577) $ (58,577) Total 844,129 — 844,129 83,870 35,461 33,415 201,985 1,014,185 $ $ 1,014,185 (269,008) 745,177 $ $ $ — — — — — — — Specialty Phosphates Mexico $ 187,743 $ 55,830 243,573 21,913 14,578 $ $ GTSP & Other 104,840 409 105,249 2,078 4,542 $ $ Eliminations — (58,018) $ (58,018) — — $ $ Total 862,399 — 862,399 109,993 42,334 20,481 $ 1,511 $ 63,447 296,315 1,407 6,655 296,315 $ 6,655 $ (18,653) — 277,662 $ 6,655 $ — — — — — — $ 33,060 195,723 1,017,723 $ $ 1,017,723 (279,212) 738,511 Page 75 of 82 For the year ended December 31, 2011 Sales Intersegment sales Total sales Operating income (a) (b) Depreciation and amortization expense Other data Capital expenditures Long-lived assets Total assets Reconciliation of total assets to reported assets Total assets Eliminations Reported assets (c) $ $ $ $ $ $ Specialty Phosphates US & Canada 525,662 1,303 526,965 94,055 19,808 25,323 127,020 648,408 $ $ $ $ 648,408 (230,840) 417,568 $ $ Specialty Phosphates Mexico GTSP & Other $ $ $ $ 186,211 49,781 235,992 21,948 18,050 5,001 59,384 278,470 278,470 (10,040) 268,430 $ $ $ $ $ 98,614 385 98,999 21,009 5,818 3,871 1,017 1,017 1,017 $ — 1,017 $ Eliminations — (51,469) (51,469) — — $ $ $ — — — — — — $ $ $ Total 810,487 — 810,487 137,012 43,676 34,195 187,421 927,895 927,895 (240,880) 687,015 (a) (b) (c) The years ended December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 include a $7.2 million, $7.1 million and $3.4 million benefit to earnings, respectively, for the CNA Fresh Water Claims in GTSP & Other. The years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include a $2.3 million and $2.4 million charge to earnings, respectively, for out of period costs. GTSP & Other reflects only direct assets. All Mexico indirect assets are included in Specialty Phosphates Mexico. Product Revenues Specialty Ingredients Food & Technical Grade PPA STPP & Detergent Grade PPA GTSP & Other Total Geographic Revenues US Mexico Canada Other foreign countries Total 2013 556,223 145,805 75,401 66,700 844,129 2013 495,276 132,737 36,574 179,542 844,129 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Year Ended December 31, 2012 514,535 151,779 91,246 104,839 862,399 $ Year Ended December 31, 2012 471,851 131,353 38,905 220,290 862,399 $ $ $ $ 2011 486,522 133,574 91,777 98,614 810,487 2011 436,981 128,018 34,976 210,512 810,487 Revenues for the geographic information are attributed to geographic areas based on the destination of the sale. Intersegment sales are recorded based on established transfer price. Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment. Page 76 of 82 21. Quarterly information (unaudited): Net sales Gross profit Net income Per share data: Income per share: Basic Diluted Net sales Gross profit Net income Per share data: Income per share: Basic Diluted 2013 Quarters ended March 31 $ 214,441 37,034 12,403 June 30 $ 213,176 40,895 11,567 (a) (a) September 30 $ 219,993 38,705 10,940 December 31 $ 196,519 41,665 14,596 Total $ 844,129 158,299 49,506 $ $ 0.56 0.55 (a) $ (a) $ 0.53 0.52 $ $ 0.50 0.49 $ $ 0.66 0.65 2012 Quarters ended March 31 $ 228,252 55,868 27,588 June 30 $ 214,180 42,368 16,504 (b) (b) September 30 December 31 $ 211,188 $ 208,779 36,405 (c) 13,392 (c) 42,779 16,706 Total $ 862,399 177,420 74,190 $ $ 1.27 1.22 (b) $ (b) $ 0.76 0.73 (c) $ (c) $ 0.77 $ 0.74 $ 0.61 0.60 (a) The first quarter of fiscal 2013 included a benefit to earnings, primarily for the settlement of the CNA Fresh Water Claims, decreasing cost of goods sold by $7.2 million and increasing net income by $5.4 million and out of period adjustments increasing cost of goods sold by $2.3 million and decreasing net income by $1.6 million. (b) The first quarter of fiscal 2012 included benefits to earnings, primarily for the settlement with Rhodia on their liability for the charges to be paid the CNA for the Fresh Water Claims, decreasing cost of goods sold by $7.1 million and increasing net income by $7.2 million. (c) The second quarter of fiscal 2012 included out of period adjustments increasing cost of goods sold by $2.4 million and decreasing net income by $1.6 million. Page 77 of 82 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure Control and Procedures The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, with the participation of management, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2013. MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control framework and processes are designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. As of December 31, 2013, management conducted an assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992). Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective at the reasonable assurance level. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s financial statements included in this report on Form 10-K and issued its report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, which is included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during or with respect to the fourth quarter of 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. Page 78 of 82 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The information required by this Item relating to Directors and Corporate Governance is set forth under the captions “The Board of Directors and its Committees—Board Committees”, “The Board of Directors and its Committees—Audit Committee”, “Proposals—Election of Board Members”, “The Board of Directors and its Committees—Other Corporate Governance Matters”, “The Board of Directors and its Committees—Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”, “Policy on Communications from Security Holders and Interested Parties” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Compliance” in the registrant’s Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item relating to Executive Officers is set forth in Item 1 under the caption “Executive Officers” and is herein incorporated by reference. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item is set forth under the caption “Executive Compensation”, “The Board of Directors and its Committees—Compensation of Directors” and “The Board of Directors and its Committees—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The information required by this Item is set forth under the captions “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by this Item is set forth under the caption “The Board of Directors and its Committees— Director Independence”, “Executive Compensation—Certain Transactions” and “Policy With Respect to Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this Item is set forth under the caption “Information Regarding the Independence of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this 10-K. See the attached Exhibit Index. Page 79 of 82 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Innophos Holdings, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized on the 27th day of February, 2014. SIGNATURES INNOPHOS HOLDINGS, INC. By: /S/ RANDOLPH GRESS Randolph Gress Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of Innophos Holdings, Inc. and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signatures Title Dates /S/ RANDOLPH GRESS Randolph Gress Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) February 27, 2014 /S/ MARK FEUERBACH Mark Feuerbach Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) February 27, 2014 /S/ CHARLES BRODHEIM Charles Brodheim Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) /S/ GARY CAPPELINE Gary Cappeline Director /S/ AMADO CAVAZOS Director Amado Cavazos /S/ LINDA MYRICK Linda Myrick /S/ KAREN OSAR Karen Osar /S/ JOHN STEITZ John Steitz Director Director Director February 27, 2014 February 27, 2014 February 27, 2014 February 27, 2014 February 27, 2014 February 27, 2014 Page 80 of 82 Exhibit No. Description EXHIBIT INDEX 3.1 Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Innophos Holdings, Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement 333-135851 on Form S-1 of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed October 30, 2006 3.2 Amended and Restated By-Laws of Innophos Holdings, Inc. as of November 30, 2007 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1/99.2B of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed December 6, 2007 4.1 Form of Common Stock certificate incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement 333-135851 on Form S-1 of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed October 30, 2006 4.2 Credit Agreement dated August 27, 2010 by and among Registrant, Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc., and Innophos, Inc., as Borrowers, a group of Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative, and Bank of America, as Syndication Agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed August 31, 2010 4.3 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2012, among Registrant, certain domestic subsidiaries as borrowers, certain domestic subsidiaries as guarantors, a group of Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as syndication agent incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed December 27, 2012 10.1 Supply Agreement (Sulphuric Acid) dated as of August 13, 2004 between Rhodia, Inc. and Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 10.2 Assignment, Assumption, and Consent to be effective May 1, 2009 concerning the Purchase and Sale Agreement of Anhydrous Ammonia, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Annual Report on Form 10- K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2011 10.3 Amended and Restated Purified Wet Phosphoric Acid Supply Agreement dated as of March 23, 2000 by and between Rhodia, Inc. and PCS Purified Phosphates incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 4 of Registration Statement 333-129951 on Form S-4 of Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) filed February 14, 2006 10.4 Amended and Restated Acid Purchase Agreement dated as of March 23, 2000 among Rhodia, Inc., PCS Sales (USA), Inc. and PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer L.P. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 4 of Registration Statement 333-129951 on Form S-4 of Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) filed February 14, 2006 10.5 Base Agreement dated as of September 1, 2003 by and between Pemex-Gas y Petroquimica Basica and Rhodia Fosfatados De Mexico S.A. de C.V. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 4 of Registration Statement 333-129951 on Form S-4 of Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) filed February 14, 2006 10.6 Purchase and Sale Agreement of Anhydrous Ammonia dated as of February 15, 2008 , by and between Pemex Petroquimica, and Innophos Fosfatados De Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Innophos Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 10.7 Sulfur Supply Contract dated as of January 1, 2011 by and Between Pemex Gas Y Petroquimica Basica and Innophos Fosfatados de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2011 10.8 Supply Agreement dated as of June 18, 1998 by and among Colgate Palmolive Company, Inmobiliaria Hills, S.A. de C.V., and Rhone-Poulenc de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Registration Statement 333-129951 on Form S-4 of Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) filed November 23, 2005 10.9 Operations Agreement made as of June 18, 1998 by and among Mission Hills, S.A. de C.V, Inmobiliaria Hills. S.A. de C.V., and Rhone-Poulenc de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of Registration Statement 333-129951 on Form S-4 of Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) filed November 23, 2005 10.10 Form of Memorandum of Agreement dated January 30, 2009 by and between Innophos, Inc. and Colgate Palmolive incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. and Innophos, Inc. (filed in redacted form per confidential treatment order) filed February 5, 2009 Page 81 of 82 10.11 Form of Individual Employment Agreement for executive officers of Innophos Servicios de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10- K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 10.12 Form of Executive Employment Agreement by and between Innophos Holdings, Inc. and executive officers incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.13 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed May 1, 2008 10.13 Innophos Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Executive Stock Option Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Amendment No. 4 of Registration Statement 333-135851 on Form S-1 of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed October 30, 2006 10.14 Form of Indemnification Agreement, by and among Innophos Holdings, Inc. and certain Directors and Executive Officers incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed January 31, 2007 10.15 Form of 2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to Amendment No. 4 of Registration Statement 333-135851 on Form S-1 of Innophos, Inc. filed October 30, 2006 10.16 Form of 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (2009 LTIP) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed June 4, 2009 10.17 Form of Award Agreement under Long Term Incentive Plans incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Form S-8 of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed June 15, 2009 10.18 Form of Innophos, Inc. Retirement Savings Restoration Plan effective as of January 1, 2006, incorporated by 10.19 reference to Exhibit 10.29 of Annual Report on Form 10-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 Innophos, Inc. 2010 Executive, Management and Sales Incentive Plan effective January 1, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed June 17, 2010 10.20 Purchase Agreement dated June 10, 2004 among Rhodia, Inc., Rhodia Canada Inc., Rhodia de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Rhodia Overseas Limited, Rhodia Consumer Specialties Limited, Rhodia, S.A. and Innophos, Inc. (f/k/a Phosphates Acquisition, Inc.), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Registration Statement 333- 129951 on Form S-4 of Innophos, Inc. filed November 23, 2005 10.21 Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 31, 2011 among KI Acquisition, Inc., Innophos, Inc. and Shareholders of KI Acquisition, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 (in redacted form per confidential treatment order) of Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed November 3, 2011 10.22 Stock and LLC Purchase Agreement among Innophos, Inc., AMT Labs, Inc., Woody IV, LLC, shareholders of AMT Labs, Inc. and members of Woody IV, LLC incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 (in redacted form per confidential treatment order) of Form 8-K of Innophos Holding, Inc. filed July 23, 2012 10.23 Partial Assignment of Rights and Obligations Agreement dated November 1, 2012, by and between Administracion Portuaria Integral de Coatzacoalcos, S.A. de C.V. and Innophos Fosfatados de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V (in redacted form per confidential treatment order) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed December 12, 2012 10.24 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of December 31, 2012 by and among Innophos Acquisition, LLC, Innophos, Inc., Triarco Industries, Inc., Reed Company, LLC and shareholders of Triarco Industries, Inc. (in redacted form per confidential treatment order) incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K of Innophos Holdings, Inc. filed January 4, 2013 12.1 Statement re: Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith 21.1 Subsidiaries of Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1, filed herewith 23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, filed herewith 31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer dated February 27, 2014 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith 31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer dated February 27, 2014 pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith 32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer dated February 27, 2014 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith 32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer dated February 27, 2014 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith Pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, agreements and instruments evidencing the rights of holders of debt whose total amount does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis are not being filed as exhibits to this report. The registrant has agreed to furnish a copy of such agreements and instruments to the Commission upon its request. Page 82 of 82 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Officers & Directors (cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86) (cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:86) (cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81) Randolph Gress Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive (cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85) Robert Harrer (cid:57)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85) Randolph Gress (cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:82)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85) (cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:41)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:42)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:42)(cid:44)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:53)(cid:36)(cid:53) Wells Fargo Gary Cappeline (cid:47)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:30)(cid:3) Chair, Compensation Committee (cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:51)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:42)(cid:44)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:56)(cid:37)(cid:47)(cid:44)(cid:38)(cid:3) (cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3)(cid:41)(cid:44)(cid:53)(cid:48) PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Iris Alvarado Vice President, Purchasing, Logistics & (cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:85)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3) Amado Cavazos (cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85) Charles Brodheim Vice President, Corporate Controller Louis Calvarin Vice President, Operations Linda Myrick (cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:30)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:3) Corporate Governance Committee Karen Osar (cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:30)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:88)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:72) William Farran Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary John Steitz (cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85) Mark Feuerbach Vice President, Investor Relations, Treasury, Financial Planning & Analysis Joseph Golowski Vice President, Specialty Phosphates Gail Holler Vice President, Human Resources Russell Kemp (cid:57)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3) (cid:9)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:78)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:262)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3) Michael Lovrich Vice President, Planning & Customer Service Abraham Shabot (cid:57)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:3) Innophos Latin America Mark Thurston Vice President, Corporate Strategy & (cid:58)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:79)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:83)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87) Sue Turner Vice President, Quality & Regulatory (cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:51)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:50)(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:54) USA (Corporate Headquarters) Innophos Holdings, Inc. 259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg A Cranbury, NJ 08512-3706 USA 609-495-2495 Mexico Innophos Mexicana S. de R.L. de C.V. Bosques de los Ciruelos 186 Piso 11 Colonia Bosques de las Lomas (cid:39)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:72)(cid:74)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:88)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:74)(cid:82) (cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:72)(cid:91)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:17)(cid:41)(cid:17) + (52) 55 5322 48 08 www.innophos.com (cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:51)(cid:43)(cid:50)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:48)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:56)(cid:41)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:56)(cid:53)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:42)(cid:3) (cid:41)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:44)(cid:47)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:40)(cid:54) Port Maitland, Ontario, Canada Chicago Heights, Illinois Chicago (Waterway), Illinois Paterson, New Jersey Ogden, Utah North Salt Lake, Utah Salt Lake City, Utah Nashville, Tennessee Green Pond, South Carolina Geismar, Louisiana San Jose de Iturbide (Mission Hills), Guanajuato, Mexico Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, Mexico Taicang, China (cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:57)(cid:40)(cid:54)(cid:55)(cid:50)(cid:53)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:36)(cid:55)(cid:44)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:49)(cid:55)(cid:36)(cid:38)(cid:55)(cid:54) investor.relations@innophos.com 609-366-1299 or Bryan Armstrong FTI Consulting, Inc. 312-553-6707 bryan.armstrong@fticonsulting.com Innophos Holdings, Inc. 259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg A Cranbury, NJ 08512-3706 USA www.innophos.com

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above