International Seaways
Annual Report 2023

Plain-text annual report

Table of Contents SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period from __________ to __________. Commission File Number 1-37836-1 INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Marshall Islands (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 600 Third Avenue, 39th Floor, New York, New York (Address of principal executive offices) 98-0467117 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 10016 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 212-578-1600 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Common Stock (no par value) Rights to Purchase Common Stock Ticker Symbol INSW N/A Name of each exchange on which registered New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ☒ Emerging growth company ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2023, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, was $1.8 billion, based on the closing price of $38.24 per share of common stock on the NYSE on that date. For this purpose, all outstanding shares of common stock have been considered held by non-affiliates, other than the shares beneficially owned by directors and officers of the registrant; certain of such persons disclaim that they are affiliates of the registrant. The number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, as of February 27, 2024: common stock, no par value, 48,930,872 shares. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed by the registrant in connection with its 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III Table of Contents PART I Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 1C. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. PART II Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. PART III Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. PART IV Item 15. Item 16. Signatures TABLE OF CONTENTS Available Information Forward-Looking Statements Supplementary Financial Information Glossary Business Our Business 2023 in Review Our Strategy Fleet Operations Human Capital Management and Employees Competition Environmental and Security Matters Relating to Bulk Shipping Inspection by Classification Societies Insurance Income Taxation of the Company Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Cybersecurity Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Reserved Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accounting Fees and Services Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Form 10-K Summary i i iii iii 1 1 1 2 4 8 10 10 18 19 19 20 42 42 45 45 45 46 50 67 68 122 122 123 123 125 125 125 125 126 131 132 Table of Contents References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the “Company”, “INSW”, “we”, “us”, or “our” refer to International Seaways, Inc. and, unless the context otherwise requires or otherwise is expressly stated, its subsidiaries. A glossary of shipping terms (the “Glossary”) that should be used as a reference when reading this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found immediately prior to Part I. Capitalized terms that are used in this Annual Report are either defined when they are first used or in the Glossary. AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company makes available free of charge through its internet website www.intlseas.com, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our website and the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The public may also read and copy any materials the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 (information on the operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330). The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at https://www.sec.gov. The Company also makes available on its website, its corporate governance guidelines, its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, insider trading policy, anti-bribery and corruption policy, incentive compensation recoupment policy, and charters of the Audit Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Risk Assessment Committee of the Board of Directors. The Company is required to disclose any amendment to a provision of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Company intends to use its website as a method of disseminating this disclosure, as permitted by applicable SEC rules. Any such disclosure will be posted to the Company website within four business days following the date of any such amendment. Neither our website nor the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, is incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. In addition, we may make or approve certain statements in future filings with the SEC, in press releases, or oral or written presentations by representatives of the Company. All statements other than statements of historical facts should be considered forward-looking statements. Words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “would”, “could”, “appears”, “believe”, “intends”, “expects”, “estimates”, “targeted”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “goal”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but should not be considered as the only means through which these statements may be made. Such forward-looking statements represent the Company’s reasonable expectation with respect to future events or circumstances based on various factors and are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to the Company’s operations, financial results, financial condition, business, prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. Undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements and consideration should be given to the following factors when reviewing any such statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to: ● the highly cyclical nature of INSW’s industry; ● fluctuations in the market value of vessels; ● declines in charter rates, including spot charter rates or other market deterioration; ● an increase in the supply of vessels without a commensurate increase in demand; ● the impact of adverse weather and natural disasters, including the continuing drought in Panama, reducing water levels in the Panama Canal and thereby decreasing the daily number of vessels permitted to transit the canal, resulting in delays crossing the canal or extending their voyages by going around Cape Horn; ● the adequacy of INSW’s insurance to cover its losses, including in connection with maritime accidents or spill events; ● constraints on capital availability; i Table of Contents ● changing economic, political and governmental conditions in the United States and/or abroad and general conditions in the oil and natural gas industry; ● the impact of changes in fuel prices; ● acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels; ● terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability, including attacks against merchant vessels in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by Iran-backed Houthi militants based in Yemen; ● the war between Russia and Ukraine could adversely affect INSW’s business; ● the impact of public health threats and outbreaks of other highly communicable diseases, including COVID-19; ● the effect of the Company’s indebtedness on its ability to finance operations, pursue desirable business opportunities and successfully run its business in the future; ● an event occurs that causes the rights issued under the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement adopted by the Company on April 11, 2023 to become exercisable; ● the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash to service its indebtedness and to comply with debt covenants; ● the Company’s ability to make capital expenditures to expand the number of vessels in its fleet, and to maintain all of its vessels and to comply with existing and new regulatory standards; ● the availability and cost of third-party service providers for technical and commercial management of the Company’s fleet; ● the Company’s ability to renew its time charters when they expire or to enter into new time charters; ● termination or change in the nature of the Company’s relationship with any of the commercial pools in which it participates and the ability of such commercial pools to pursue a profitable chartering strategy; ● competition within the Company’s industry and INSW’s ability to compete effectively for charters with companies with greater resources; ● the loss of a large customer or significant business relationship; ● the Company’s ability to realize benefits from its past acquisitions or acquisitions or other strategic transactions it may make in the future; ● increasing operating costs and capital expenses as the Company’s vessels age, including increases due to limited shipbuilder warranties or the consolidation of suppliers; ● the Company’s ability to replace its operating leases on favorable terms, or at all; ● changes in credit risk with respect to the Company’s counterparties on contracts; ● the failure of contract counterparties to meet their obligations; ● the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees; ● work stoppages or other labor disruptions by employees of INSW or other companies in related industries; ● unexpected drydock costs; ● the potential for technological innovation to reduce the value of the Company’s vessels and charter income derived therefrom; ● the impact of an interruption in or failure of the Company’s information technology and communication systems upon the Company’s ability to operate; ● seasonal variations in INSW’s revenues; ● government requisition of the Company’s vessels during a period of war or emergency; ● the Company’s compliance with complex laws, regulations and in particular, environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to ballast water treatment and the emission of greenhouse gases and air contaminants, including from marine engines; ● legal, regulatory or market measures to address climate change, including proposals to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) and other sustainability initiatives, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business and results of operations; ● increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders, and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance policies; ● any non-compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 or other applicable regulations relating to bribery or corruption; ● the impact of litigation, government inquiries and investigations; ● governmental claims against the Company; ● the arrest of INSW’s vessels by maritime claimants; ● changes in laws, including governing tax laws, treaties or regulations, including those relating to environmental and security matters; ii Table of Contents ● changes in worldwide trading conditions, including the impact of tariffs, trade sanctions, boycotts and other restrictions on trade; and ● pending and future tax law changes may result in significant additional taxes to INSW. Investors should carefully consider these risk factors and the additional risk factors outlined in more detail in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other reports hereafter filed by the Company with the SEC under the caption “Risk Factors.” The Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or its representatives after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statement contained in this paragraph and in other reports hereafter filed by the Company with the SEC. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION The Company reports its financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“GAAP”). However, the Company has included certain non-GAAP financial measures and ratios, which it believes provide useful information to both management and readers of this report in measuring the financial performance and financial condition of the Company. These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, nor should they be construed as an alternative to other titled measures determined in accordance with GAAP. The Company presents three non-GAAP financial measures: time charter equivalent revenues, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Time charter equivalent revenues represent shipping revenues less voyage expenses, as a measure to compare revenue generated from a voyage charter to revenue generated from a time charter. EBITDA represents net income/(loss) before interest expense and income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. Adjusted EBITDA consists of EBITDA adjusted for the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance. This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes industry data and forecasts that we have prepared based, in part, on information obtained from industry publications and surveys. Third- party industry publications, surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. In addition, certain statements regarding our market position in this report are based on information derived from the Company’s market studies and research reports. Unless we state otherwise, statements about the Company’s relative competitive position in this report are based on our management’s beliefs, internal studies and management’s knowledge of industry trends. GLOSSARY Unless otherwise noted or indicated by the context, the following terms used in the Annual Report on Form 10-K have the following meanings: Aframax—A medium size crude oil tanker of approximately 80,000 to 120,000 deadweight tons. Aframaxes can generally transport from 500,000 to 800,000 barrels of crude oil and are also used in Lightering. A coated Aframax operating in the refined petroleum products trades may be referred to as an LR2. Ballast — Any heavy material, including water, carried temporarily or permanently in a vessel to provide desired draft and stability. Bareboat charter—A charter under which a customer pays a fixed daily or monthly rate for a fixed period of time for use of the vessel. The customer pays all costs of operating the vessel, including voyage and vessel expenses. Bareboat charters are usually long term. b/d—Barrels per day. Charter—Contract entered into with a customer for the use of the vessel for a specific voyage at a specific rate per unit of cargo (“voyage charter”), or for a specific period of time at a specific rate per unit (day or month) of time (“time charter”). Classification Societies—Organizations that establish and administer standards for the design, construction and operational maintenance of vessels. As a practical matter, vessels cannot trade unless they meet these standards. Commercial management or commercially managed—The management of the employment, or chartering, of a vessel and associated functions, including seeking and negotiating employment for vessels, billing and collecting revenues, issuing voyage instructions, purchasing fuel, and appointing port agents. iii Table of Contents Commercial management agreements or CMA — A contract under which the commercial management of a vessel is outsourced to a third-party service provider. Commercial pool—A commercial pool is a group of similar size and quality vessels with different shipowners that are placed under one administrator or manager. Pools allow for scheduling and other operating efficiencies such as multi-legged charters and contracts of affreightment and other operating efficiencies. Consolidated Net Debt to Book Capital— Consolidated debt, net of unamortized discounts and deferred finance costs and the sum of consolidated cash and cash equivalents, short- term investments and non-current restricted cash divided by total equity. Consolidated Net Debt to Assets Value—Consolidated debt, net of unamortized discounts and deferred finance costs and the sum of consolidated cash and cash equivalents, short- term investments and non-current restricted cash, divided by the fair value of the Company’s owned fleet of vessels. Contract of affreightment or COA—An agreement providing for the transportation between specified points for a specific quantity of cargo over a specific time period but without designating specific vessels or voyage schedules, thereby allowing flexibility in scheduling since no vessel designation is required. COAs can either have a fixed rate or a market- related rate. One example would be two shipments of 70,000 tons per month for two years at the prevailing spot rate at the time of each loading. Crude oil—Oil in its natural state that has not been refined or altered. Deadweight tons or dwt—The unit of measurement used to represent cargo carrying capacity of a vessel, but including the weight of consumables such as fuel, lube oil, drinking water and stores. Demurrage—Additional revenue paid to the shipowner on its voyage charters for delays experienced in loading and/or unloading cargo that are not deemed to be the responsibility of the shipowner, calculated in accordance with specific Charter terms. Diamond S – Diamond S Shipping Inc., a Republic of Marshall Islands corporation, which pursuant to the Merger became a wholly-owned subsidiary of INSW. Drydocking—An out-of-service period during which planned repairs and maintenance are carried out, including all underwater maintenance such as external hull painting. During the drydocking, certain mandatory Classification Society inspections are carried out and relevant certifications issued. Normally, as the age of a vessel increases, the cost and frequency of drydockings increase. Emission Control Area—A sea area in which stricter controls are established to minimize airborne emissions from ships as defined by Annex VI of the 1997 MARPOL Protocol. Exclusive Economic Zone—An area that extends up to 200 nautical miles beyond the territorial sea of a state’s coastline (land at lowest tide) over which the state has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring, exploiting, conserving and managing natural resources. Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (“scrubber”)—Shipboard equipment intended to reduce sulfur air emissions to within regulatory limits. Floating Storage Offloading Unit or FSO—A converted or new build barge or tanker, moored at a location to receive crude or other products for storage and transfer purposes. FSOs are not equipped with petroleum processing facilities. FSO Joint Venture—the two joint ventures between wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company and Euronav N.V. that each owned one FSO and for which the Company’s subsidiaries sold their entire interests to subsidiaries of Euronav N.V. in June 2022. Handysize— Smaller product carrier of approximately 25,000 to 42,000 deadweight tons, generally operate on medium-range or shorter routes. International Energy Agency or IEA — An intergovernmental organization established in the framework of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development in 1974. Among other things, the IEA provides research, statistics, analysis and recommendations relating to energy. International Maritime Organization or IMO—An agency of the United Nations, which is the body that is responsible for the administration of internationally developed maritime safety and pollution treaties, including MARPOL. iv Table of Contents International Flag—International law requires that every merchant vessel be registered in a country. International Flag vessel refers to those vessels that are registered under a flag other than that of the United States. LIBOR—the London Interbank Offered Rate. Lightering—The process of off-loading crude oil or petroleum products from large size tankers, typically VLCCs, into smaller tankers and/or barges for discharge in ports from which the larger tankers are restricted due to the depth of the water, narrow entrances or small berths. LR1—A coated Panamax tanker. LR is an abbreviation of Long Range. LR2—A coated Aframax tanker. MARPOL—International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto. This convention includes regulations aimed at preventing and minimizing pollution from ships by accident and by routine operations. Merger – the merger on July 16, 2021 of Merger Sub with and into Diamond S with Diamond S surviving such merger as a wholly- owned subsidiary of INSW pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 30, 2021 by and among INSW, Diamond S and Merger Sub. Merger Sub – Dispatch Transaction Sub, Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation that was a wholly-owned subsidiary of INSW and that merged with and into Diamond S in the Merger. MR—An abbreviation for Medium Range. Certain types of vessels, such as a Product Carrier of approximately 42,000 to 60,000 deadweight tons, generally operate on medium- range routes. OECD—Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is a group of developed countries in North America, Europe and Asia. OPEC—Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which is an international organization established to coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its members. P&I insurance or P&I—Protection and indemnity insurance, commonly known as P&I insurance, is a form of marine insurance provided by a P&I club. A P&I club is a mutual (i.e., a co-operative) insurance association that provides cover for its members, who will typically be shipowners, ship-operators or demise charterers. Panamax—A medium size vessel of approximately 53,000 to 80,000 deadweight tons. A coated Panamax operating in the refined petroleum products trades may be referred to as an LR1. Product Carrier—General term that applies to any tanker that is used to transport refined oil products, such as gasoline, jet fuel or heating oil. Safety Management System or SMS—A framework of processes and procedures that addresses a spectrum of operational risks associated with quality, environment, health and safety. The SMS is certified by ISM (International Safety Management Code), ISO 9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management). Scrubber—See Exhaust Gas Cleaning System. SOFR—Secured Overnight Financing Rate. Special Survey—An extensive inspection of a vessel by Classification Society surveyors that must be completed once every five-year period. Special surveys require a vessel to be drydocked. Suezmax—A large crude oil tanker of approximately 120,000 to 200,000 deadweight tons. Suezmaxes can generally transport about one million barrels of crude oil. v Table of Contents Technical Management or technically managed—The management of the operation of a vessel, including physically maintaining the vessel, maintaining necessary certifications, and supplying necessary stores, spares, and lubricating oils. Responsibilities also generally include selecting, engaging and training crew, and arranging necessary insurance coverage. Time Charter—A Charter under which a customer pays a fixed daily or monthly rate for a fixed period of time for use of the vessel. Subject to any restrictions in the Charter, the customer decides the type and quantity of cargo to be carried and the ports of loading and unloading. The customer pays all voyage expenses such as fuel, canal tolls, and port charges. The shipowner pays all vessel expenses such as the technical management expenses. Time Charter Equivalent or TCE—TCE is the abbreviation for time charter equivalent. TCE revenues, which is voyage revenues less voyage expenses, serves as an industry standard for measuring and managing fleet revenue and comparing results between geographical regions and among competitors. Ton-mile demand—A calculation that multiplies the average distance of each route a tanker travels by the volume of cargo moved. The greater the increase in long haul movement compared with shorter haul movements, the higher the increase in ton-mile demand. U.S. Coast Guard or USCG—The United States Coast Guard. Vessel expenses—Includes crew costs, vessel stores and supplies, lubricating oils, maintenance and repairs, insurance and communication costs associated with the operations of vessels. Vessel Recycling—The complete or partial dismantling of a ship at a recycling facility to recover components and materials for reprocessing and reuse, including management and care of hazardous and other similar materials. VLCC—VLCC is the abbreviation for Very Large Crude Carrier, a large crude oil tanker of approximately 200,000 to 320,000 deadweight tons. VLCCs can generally transport two million barrels or more of crude oil. These vessels are mainly used on the longest (long haul) routes from the Arabian Gulf to North America, Europe, and Asia, from West Africa to the United States and Asian destinations and from the Americas to Asian destinations. Voyage Charter—A charter under which a customer pays a transportation charge for the movement of a specific cargo between two or more specified ports. The shipowner pays all Voyage Expenses, and all Vessel Expenses unless the vessel to which the Charter relates has been time chartered-in. The customer is liable for Demurrage, if incurred. Voyage Expenses—Includes fuel, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling operations and brokerage commissions paid by the Company under voyage charters. These expenses are subtracted from shipping revenues to calculate TCE revenues for voyage charters. vi Table of Contents ITEM 1. BUSINESS OUR BUSINESS PART I International Seaways, Inc., a Marshall Islands corporation incorporated in 1999, and its wholly owned subsidiaries own and operate a fleet of oceangoing vessels engaged primarily in the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the International Flag trade. Our vessel operations are organized into two segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. At December 31, 2023, we owned or operated an International Flag fleet of 73 vessels (totaling an aggregate of 8.8 million dwt), consisting of VLCC, Suezmax and Aframax crude tankers, as well as LR2, LR1 and MR product carriers. In addition to our operating fleet of 73 vessels, four dual-fuel ready LR1 newbuilds are scheduled for delivery to the Company between the second half of 2025 and first quarter of 2026, bringing the total operating and newbuild fleet to 77 vessels. The Marshall Islands is the principal flag of registry of our vessels. Additional information about our fleet, including its ownership profile, is set forth under “— Fleet Operations — Fleet Summary,” as well as on the Company’s website, www.intlseas.com. Neither our website nor the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our ultimate customers, including those of the commercial pools in which we participate, include major independent and state-owned oil companies, oil traders, refinery operators and international government entities. We generally charter our vessels to customers either for specific voyages at spot rates through the services of pools in which the Company participates, or for specific periods of time at fixed daily rates through time charters or bareboat charters. Spot market rates are highly volatile, while time charter and bareboat charter rates provide more predictable streams of TCE revenues because they are fixed for specific periods of time. For a more detailed discussion on factors influencing spot and time charter markets, see “— Fleet Operations — Commercial Management” below. 2023 IN REVIEW For the second consecutive year, we had our best financial results since becoming an independent public company in 2016. Shipping revenues and TCE Revenues achieved in 2023 were $1.1 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, of which approximately 51% were generated from our Product Carriers segment and 49% from our Crude Tankers segment. Income from vessel operations increased by $172.7 million to $615.4 million in 2023, from $442.7 million in 2022, primarily driven by higher average daily rates across most of INSW’s fleet sectors. We achieved an Adjusted EBITDA (see Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for definition) of $723.8 million in 2023 compared to $549.1 million in 2022. In addition, we continued to build a strong balance sheet by increasing total liquidity to $601.2 million from $541.1 million at the end of 2022, prepaying $323.5 million of outstanding debt in addition to regular principal amortization of $152.2 million and ended the year with 41% (i.e., 30 vessels) of our fleet unencumbered, a net loan to value ratio of 17%, and a net debt-to-capital ratio of 23.8%. We made approximately $241.2 million in capital investments for vessel and other property purchases, vessel improvements, vessel construction and drydocking. We also returned capital to our shareholders through cash dividends totaling $308.2 million and $13.9 million in repurchases of our common stock. During 2023 we continued to focus on (i) maximizing our fleet’s earning potential through safe and reliable operations, opportunistic charter-ins/charter-outs, and sales and purchases of vessels, (ii) building on our track record as a disciplined capital allocator, and (iii) executing transactions that would ultimately unlock the value of our shares to investors. We executed these goals during 2023 by: ● Building on our track record as a disciplined capital allocator o In a cyclical business such as ours, we believe that capital allocation is not a formula embedded in a financial metric but levers that we pull at the right times in the cycle. We have a track record of buying vessel assets at low points, voluntarily decreasing our leverage and returning a substantial amount of cash to shareholders. o We paid out $322.1 million in returns to our shareholders during 2023. o We finalized the construction of our three dual-fuel LNG VLCCs, which were delivered during the first half of 2023 and commenced employment on seven-year time charters with the oil major Shell. o Completed the $42.3 million purchase of two 2009-built Aframaxes that were previously bareboat chartered-in. 1 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ● Maintaining our fleet optimization program: o We sold three 2008-built MRs, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $38.8 million after debt repayment. o We entered into construction contracts for four dual-fuel ready LR1 product carriers, which are expected to deliver between the third quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026. The total construction cost for the vessels will be approximately $231 million, which will be paid for through a combination of long-term financing and available liquidity. o We opportunistically locked in $172.6 million of minimum revenues (before reduction for brokerage commissions) on non-cancelable time charters with durations of two to three years for one Suezmax, one Aframax and six MRs with charter expiry dates ranging from February 2025 to June 2026. These charters have increased the contracted future minimum revenues remaining under our time charter agreements (excluding any applicable profit share) to approximately $354.3 million from January 1, 2024 through charter expiry. ● Executed a number of liquidity enhancing, deleveraging and financing diversification initiatives, including: o We prepaid $323.5 million of outstanding debt under our $750 Million Facility Term Loan and COSCO Lease Financing during 2023. This ultimately resulted in the release of 30 vessels from the collateral packages of the respective credit facilities. o As a result of the principal prepayments made under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan during 2023, the scheduled quarterly principal amortization under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan decreased from $30.2 million at the beginning of the year to $19.0 million at the end of the year. o We entered into a secured $160 million revolving credit facility, which matures on March 27, 2029 and reduces on a 20-year age-adjusted profile. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Liquidity and Sources of Capital,” for further details on these financing transactions. OUR STRATEGY Our primary objectives are to (i) maintain safe and reliable vessel operations that improves energy efficiency and reduces our environmental footprint; (ii) actively manage the size, age and composition of our fleet over the course of market cycles to increase investment returns and available capital; (iii) maximize cash flows through management of vessel employment in the spot market through our participation in a number of commercial pools and selective time charters; (iv) defend and grow the market share and profits of our asset light Crude Tankers Lightering business; (v) execute a disciplined yet flexible capital allocation strategy that is aligned with the shipping industry cycles by maintaining a strong balance sheet in order to use cash flow generation for opportunistic fleet investment, further de-levering that reduces cash break evens and/or interest costs and increases return to shareholders; and (vi) enter into value-creating transactions. The key elements of our strategy are: Generate strong cash flows through a blend of spot market and period market exposure We believe we are well-positioned to generate strong cash flows by identifying and taking advantage of attractive chartering opportunities in the International Flag tanker market. We will continue to pursue an overall chartering strategy, with a substantial spot rate exposure that provides us with higher returns when the more volatile spot market is stronger. We currently deploy the majority of our fleet on a spot rate basis to benefit from market volatility and what we believe are the traditionally higher returns the spot market offers compared with time charters. We believe this strategy continues to offer significant upside exposure to the spot market and an opportunity to capture enhanced profit margins at times when vessel demand exceeds supply. As of December 31, 2023, we participated in seven commercial pools as our principal means of participation in the spot market — Tankers International (“TI”), Penfield Tankers (“PENFIELD”), Panamax International (“PI”), Clean Products Tankers Alliance (“CPTA”), Norden Tanker Pool (“NTP”), Hafnia Tanker Pool (“HTP”) and Aframax International Pool (“AI”) — each selected for specific expertise in its respective market. Our continued participation in pools allows us to benefit from economies of scale and higher vessel utilization rates. 2 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents We plan to continue to complement our spot chartering strategy by selectively employing a portion of our vessels on time charters that provide consistent cash flows. As of December 31, 2023, we had three VLCCs, two Suezmaxes, one Aframax, and six MRs on time charters expiring between August 2024 and April 2030. We may seek to place other tonnage on time charters, for storage or transport, when we can do so at attractive rates. Actively manage our fleet to maximize return on capital over market cycles. We will continue to actively manage the size and composition of our fleet through opportunistic accretive acquisitions and dispositions as part of our effort to achieve above-market returns on capital for our vessel assets and renew our fleet. Using our commercial, financial and operational expertise, we will continue to execute our plan to opportunistically grow our fleet through the timely and selective acquisition of high-quality secondhand vessels, resales or newbuild contracts when we believe those acquisitions will result in attractive returns on invested capital and increased cash flow. We also intend to continue to engage in opportunistic dispositions where we can achieve attractive values for our vessels relative to their anticipated future earnings from operations as we assess the market cycle. Taken together, we believe these activities have and will continue to help us maintain a diverse, high-quality and modern fleet of crude oil and refined product vessels with an enhanced return on invested capital. We believe our diverse and versatile fleet, our experience and our long-standing relationships with participants in the crude and refined product shipping industry position us to identify and take advantage of attractive acquisition opportunities in any vessel class in the international market. Maintain an appropriate and flexible financial profile. We seek to maintain a strong balance sheet and prudent financial leverage with sufficient liquidity that positions us to take advantage of attractive strategic opportunities throughout the dynamic tanker cycles of the shipping sector. During 2023, we maintained what we believe to be reasonable financial leverage for the current point in the tanker cycle. As of December 31, 2023, we had total liquidity on a consolidated basis of $601.2 million, comprised of $186.8 million of cash and short-term investments and $414.4 million of remaining undrawn revolver capacity, as well as a Consolidated Net Debt to Assets Value and Consolidated Net Debt to Book Capital ratios of 17% and 23.8%, respectively. Environmental, Social and Governance Initiatives We are committed to fulfilling our mission of transporting energy safely and efficiently to customers around the world using well-maintained assets operated by dedicated crews in a diligent and environmentally sustainable manner. We recognize that greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, which are largely caused by burning fossil fuels, contribute to the warming of the global climate system. Our industry, which is heavily dependent on the burning of fossil fuels, faces the dual challenge of reducing its carbon footprint by transitioning to the use of low-carbon fuels while extending the economic and social benefits of delivering energy to consumers across the globe. We welcome and support efforts, such as those led by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”), to increase transparency and to promote investors’ understanding of how we and our industry peers are addressing the climate change-related risks and opportunities particular to our industry. The Company’s governance, strategy, risk management and performance monitoring efforts in this area are evolving and will continue to do so over time: Governance – Our Board of Directors (10 members as of December 31, 2023, including eight independent members), has experts in shipping and compliance and engages in regular discussions relating to environmental matters and the Company’s response to climate change-related risks and opportunities. The Company’s management team, led by the Chief Executive Officer, has the day-to-day responsibility to execute the action plans as approved by the Board of Directors. Strategy – We are committed to Environmental, Social and Governance practices as a part of our core culture. To achieve our goals, we have taken actions which include: - - The establishment of a Performance and Sustainability team, and creation of the new role of Sustainability Engineer, who are tasked with both educating the organization as well as putting in place programs and initiatives to expand our decarbonization efforts; The continuing implementation of a third-party data collection and analysis platform which allows data to be gathered from our vessels for use in advanced analytics with the aim of reducing our fuel consumption and CO2 and GHG emissions; 3 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents - - - - - - - - The inclusion of a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism in both the $750 Million Credit Facility and the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility. The mechanism has been certified by an independent, leading firm in ESG and corporate governance research as meeting sustainability-linked loan principles. The adjustment in pricing will be linked to the carbon efficiency of the INSW fleet as it relates to reductions in CO2 emissions year-over-year, such that it aligns with the IMO’s 50% industry reduction target in GHG emissions by 2050. This key performance indicator is calculated in a manner consistent with the de- carbonization trajectory outlined in the Poseidon Principles, the global framework by which financial institutions can assess the climate alignment of their ship finance portfolios. The relevant emissions data for our fleet will be reported to the applicable Classification Societies, the IMO and the lenders under our sustainability-linked loan facility. We also intend to make such emissions data publicly available. In addition to this GHG reduction measure, the pricing mechanism in the $750 Million Credit Facility also includes key performance indicators relating to crew safety and investment by the Company aimed at improving energy efficiency and the reduction of emissions; Participation on the Board of Directors of the International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation, the leading not-for-profit marine ship pollution response advisors; Participation in the Marine Anti-Corruption Network, a global business network of over 100 members whose vision is a maritime industry free of corruption that enables fair trade to the benefit of society at large; The installation of Ballast Water Treatment Systems on vessels to comply with all applicable regulations; Participation as a signatory to the Neptune Declaration on Seafarer Wellbeing and Crew Change, in a worldwide call to action to end the unprecedented crew change crisis caused by COVID-19; Participation as a signatory to the Gulf of Guinea Declaration on the Suppression of Piracy, which has been signed by more than 500 organizations across the maritime industry and sets out a series of steps to help decrease and end the threat of piracy in the Gulf of Guinea; Specific consideration of overall fuel consumption when selecting vessel purchase candidates and ships in our fleet to consider for disposition, in order to reduce our fleet’s contribution to GHG emissions; and Our continued commitment to practice environmentally and socially responsible ship recycling. Stoppage of work until identified unsafe working conditions are rectified and improvements in procedures for materials handling were some of the positive takeaways noted from our most recent recycling projects. Additionally, during 2023, we completed the construction of our three dual-fuel LNG VLCCs at Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering’s shipyard. We expect these tankers to be well suited to adhere to future environmental regulation throughout their life. Their significant environmental benefits, including substantially reducing our carbon footprint, are in keeping with our commitment to ESG-focused corporate citizenship. Risk Management – Due to the nature of our business, environmental and climate change-related risks are included in key risks discussed at the Board of Directors level. What we believe to be the most significant of such risks are described in the “Item 1A – Risk Factors” section below. Metrics and Targets – As a part of the actions described in the “Strategy” section above, we are working to meet the carbon efficiency targets included in our sustainability-linked loan and to establish other appropriate metrics by which to measure our performance and drive improvement. FLEET OPERATIONS Fleet Summary As of December 31, 2023, our operating fleet consisted of 73 vessels, 59 of which were owned and 14 of which were chartered in (including 13 vessels under bareboat charters pursuant to sale and leaseback arrangements which are deemed to be financing arrangements). Vessels chartered-in include one time charter. The Company is subject to purchase obligations for 10 of the vessels under sale and leaseback financing arrangements at the end of each bareboat charter. See Note 16, “Leases,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information 4 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents relating to the Company’s chartered-in vessels. The Company’s fleet list excludes vessels chartered-in where the duration of the charter was one year or less at inception, as well as any workboats chartered-in by our Crude Tankers Lightering business. Vessel Fleet and Type Operating Fleet Crude Tankers VLCC Suezmax Aframax Total Product Carriers LR2 LR1 MR Total Total Owned and Operated Fleet Newbuild Fleet LR1 Total Newbuild Fleet Total Operating and Newbuild Fleet Business Segments Vessels Owned Vessels Chartered-in Number Total Dwt Total at December 31, 2023 4 13 4 21 1 6 31 38 59 4 4 63 9 — — 9 — 1 4 5 14 — — 14 13 13 4 30 1 7 35 43 73 4 4 77 3,910,572 2,061,754 452,375 6,424,701 112,691 522,698 1,750,854 2,386,243 8,810,944 294,400 294,400 9,105,344 The bulk shipping of crude oil and refined petroleum products has many distinct market segments based largely on the size and design configuration of vessels required and, in some cases, on the flag of registry. Freight rates in each market segment are determined by a variety of factors affecting the supply and demand for suitable vessels. Our diverse fleet gives us the ability to provide a broad range of services to global customers. Tankers and product carriers are not bound to specific ports or schedules and therefore can respond to market opportunities by moving between trades and geographical areas. The Company has established two reportable business segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. For additional information regarding the Company’s two reportable segments for the three years ended December 31, 2023, see Note 5, “Business and Segment Reporting,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Crude Tankers (including Crude Tankers Lightering) Our Crude Tankers reportable business segment is made up of a fleet of VLCCs, Suezmaxes, and Aframaxes engaged in the worldwide transportation of crude oil. This segment also includes our Crude Tankers Lightering business through which we provide ship-to-ship (or “STS”) lightering support services and full-service STS lightering to customers in the U.S. Gulf (“USG”), U.S. Pacific, Grand Bahama and Panama regions. In STS lightering support service, we provide the personnel and equipment (hoses and fenders) to facilitate the transferring of cargo between seagoing ships positioned alongside each other, either stationary or underway. In full-service STS lightering, we provide the lightering vessel, usually an Aframax tanker, in addition to the personnel and equipment to facilitate the transferring of cargo. Demand for lightering services is significantly affected by the level of crude oil imports into the United States and, in recent years, by the volumes of crude oil exports from the United States. Our customers include oil companies and trading companies that are importing or exporting crude oil in the USG to or from larger Suezmax and VLCC vessels, which are prevented from using certain ports due to their size and draft. 5 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Product Carriers Our Product Carriers reportable business segment consists of a fleet of MRs, LR1 product carriers, and an LR2 product carrier engaged in the worldwide transportation of refined petroleum products. Refined petroleum product cargoes are transported from refineries to consuming markets characterized by both long and short-haul routes. The market for these product cargoes is driven by global refinery capacity, changes in consumer demand and product specifications and cargo arbitrage opportunities. In contrast to the crude oil tanker market, the refined petroleum trades are more complex due to the diverse nature of product cargoes, which include gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, home heating oil, vegetable oils and organic chemicals (e.g., methanol and ethylene glycols). The trades require crew to have specialized certifications. Customer vetting requirements can be more rigorous and, in general, vessel operations are more complex due to the fact that refineries can be in closer proximity to importing nations, resulting in more frequent port calls and more discharging, cleaning and loading operations than crude oil tankers. The Company’s MR product carriers are IMO III compliant, allowing those vessels to carry edible oils, such as palm and vegetable oil, increasing flexibility when switching between cargo grades. In order to take advantage of market conditions and optimize economic performance, we employ our LR1 Product Carriers, which currently participate in the PI pool, in the transportation of crude oil cargoes. Commercial and Technical Management of Fleet – Hybrid Operating Model We employ a hybrid operating model in the commercial and technical management of our fleet. Our in-house commercial and technical management experts utilize third-party service providers to execute our commercial and technical operations, while providing us with the flexibility to scale operations up or down with our fleet across various shipping cycles. Commercial Pools and other Commercial Management Arrangements We currently utilize third-party managed pools as the principal commercial strategy for our vessels participating in the spot voyage charter markets. By operating a large number of vessels as an integrated transportation system, commercial pools offer customers greater flexibility and a higher level of service while achieving scheduling efficiencies. Pools are commercially managed by experienced commercial operators that, among other things, arrange charters for the vessels participating in the pool in exchange for an administrative fee. Technical management is performed or outsourced by each shipowner. The pools collect revenue from customers, pay voyage-related expenses, and distribute TCE revenues to the participants after deducting administrative fees, according to formulas that capture the contribution of each vessel to the pool by: ● first, summarizing the earnings capacity of each vessel (as determined by the pool operator based largely on the physical characteristics and fuel consumption) to a number of “points;” ● second, multiplying each vessel’s “points” by the number of days that vessel operated during a specified period (the “Vessel Contribution”); ● third, multiplying the total number of points of all vessels in the pool by the total number of days all vessels in the pool operated (the “Total Earnings”); and ● fourth, dividing the Vessel Contribution by the Total Earnings. Pools negotiate charters with customers primarily in the spot market. The size and scope of these pools enable them to enhance utilization for pool vessels by securing backhaul voyages and Contracts of Affreightment (“COAs”), thereby reducing wait time and providing a high level of service to customers. We also employ third-party commercial managers on a limited basis for some of our vessels from time-to-time in the spot market through Commercial Management Agreements (“CMAs”). Under the CMAs, the manager collects revenue, pays for voyage related expenses and distributes the actual voyage results for each individual ship under management and receives a management fee. 6 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The table below summarizes the pool deployment of our conventional tanker fleet as of December 31, 2023: Graphic (a) We delivered a third Aframax vessel into the pool in February 2024 after completion of its scheduled drydock. Spot Market Voyage charters, including vessels operating in commercial pools that predominantly operate in the spot market, constituted 91% of the Company’s aggregate TCE revenues in 2023 compared to 96% in 2022. Accordingly, the Company’s shipping revenues are significantly affected by the amount of available tonnage both at the time such tonnage is required and over the period of projected use, and the levels of seaborne and shore-based inventories of crude oil and refined products. Seasonal trends affect world oil consumption and consequently vessel demand. While trends in consumption vary with seasons, peaks in demand quite often precede the seasonal consumption peaks as refiners and suppliers try to anticipate consumer demand. Seasonal peaks in oil demand have been principally driven by increased demand prior to Northern Hemisphere winters and increased demand for gasoline prior to the summer driving season in the United States. Available tonnage is affected over time by the volume of newbuilding deliveries, the number of tankers used to store clean products and crude oil, and the removal (principally through vessel recycling or conversion) of existing vessels from service. Vessel recycling is affected by the level of freight rates, recycling prices, vetting standards established by charterers and terminals and by international and U.S. governmental regulations that establish maintenance standards and regulatory compliance standards. 7 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Time Charter Market Time charters constituted 9% and 4% of the Company’s TCE revenues in 2023 and 2022, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, we had three VLCCs, two Suezmaxes, one Aframax, and six MRs deployed on non-cancelable time charters expiring between August 2024 and April 2030. Within a contract period, time charters provide a predictable level of revenues without the fluctuations inherent in spot-market rates. Once a time charter expires, however, the ability to secure a new time charter may be uncertain and subject to market conditions at such time. See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —“General,” for further information on the future minimum revenues, before reduction for brokerage commissions, expected to be received on our non-cancelable time charters. Technical Management In an effort to streamline our operations, during 2022, we began the process of paring down the number of outsourced third-party technical managers to only two managers from five managers. This transition process was successfully completed during the second quarter of 2023. The managers supervise the technical management of our vessels and the integrity of our operations to ensure industry leading safety, compliance, environmental protection and service quality. We retain a pool of well-trained seafarers to serve on our vessels. We continue to hire the crew, with the managers acting as agents on our behalf. In addition to regular maintenance and repair, crews onboard each vessel and shore-side personnel must ensure that the vessels in the Company’s fleet meet or exceed regulatory standards established by organizations such as the IMO and the U.S. Coast Guard. HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 2023, we had 2,698 employees comprised of 2,633 seafarers employed on our fleet and 65 shoreside staff. We believe a commitment to and investment in human capital management helps us build competitive advantage and furthers our long-term success. Our highly skilled seafarers and shoreside employees are the foundation of everything that we do and the embodiment of our “do the right thing” culture. We depend on our workforce to provide superior service and to ensure our vessels are operated safely and securely. Our seafarers are hired by the technical managers acting as agent for the individual ship owning companies, each of which is a subsidiary of INSW. All of the seafarers onboard our vessels are represented by collective bargaining agreements. We consider our seafarers and union relationships to be strong. To facilitate the recruitment, development and retention of our valuable seafarers and shoreside employees, we strive to make INSW a diverse, inclusive and safe workplace, with opportunities for our employees to grow and develop in their careers. Talent Development To support the advancement of our employees, we offer training and development programs encouraging advancement from within. We leverage both formal and informal programs to identify, foster, and retain top seafarer and shoreside talent. On average, our seafarers have worked for us for more than 10 years and more than half of our shore-based employees have worked for us for at least 15 years. For our seafarers, ongoing training is integral to conducting safe operations and keeping employees engaged. One key part of our training regimen is our crew conferences. Senior leaders from the Company, our fleet and our third-party managers spend three days with up to 100 seafarers from across our fleet, representing all ranks and nationalities. During the conferences, the seafarers are updated on new policies, regulations, and procedures. Interactive learning sessions and team building exercises are used to foster communication and shared learnings. Day long training sessions are capped off with a social agenda that celebrates successes during the year and includes the presentation of awards for long time service with the Company. This presents management with both an opportunity to teach and to learn and provides everyone with an excellent networking opportunity. Succession Planning Our Board of Directors believe that planning for succession is an important function. We continually strive to foster the professional development of management and team members. We continue to invest in developing a very experienced and strong group of leaders, 8 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents with their performance subject to ongoing monitoring and evaluation, as potential successors to our senior management, including our CEO. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) Diversity and Inclusion is at the core of all we do and drives us to build and reinforce an inclusive culture. We believe unique ideas and perspectives fuel innovation and our differences make us stronger and better. We value difference in gender, race, ethnicity, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, ability, cultural background, religion, veteran status, experience, thought, and more across the globe. We recognize the importance of diverse teams, an equitable workplace and an inclusive culture in driving innovation and competitiveness. Our commitment to Diversity and Inclusion starts at the top with a diverse Board of Directors and executive management team, who represent a broad spectrum of backgrounds and perspectives. We believe that the diversity of our Board of Directors as of December 31, 2023 (including three women and one Asian American) and the diversity of our executive leadership (two of the Company’s six executive officers belong to underrepresented minorities and are diverse by ethnic background, non-U.S. place of birth, or gender) is a testament to our ongoing commitment to hiring, developing, and retaining diverse talent. Shoreside Employees Seafarers Total Employees Board of Directors(a) Non-Director Senior Management Non-Director Senior Management Direct Reports (a) Includes our CEO who is also a member of the Board of Directors As of December 31, 2023 Male Female 22 4 26 As of December 31, 2023 Male Female 3 — 21 43 2,629 2,672 7 5 38 We recognize the need to address gender representation in our industry. While we take pride in the diverse range of nationalities represented among our seafarers, we acknowledge that our crews are almost entirely male. Unfortunately, this gender disparity is not unique to our company but prevalent across the broader shipping industry, as only 2% of the crewing population is female, the majority of whom sail in the cruise and leisure segments. We are committed to overcoming hurdles to women’s career opportunities at sea, ensuring safety, and fostering an environment in which all people can thrive. International Seaways is a founding member of the Global Maritime Forum’s All Aboard Alliance, a transformative industry initiative aimed at fostering diversity and inclusivity both ashore and at sea. As part of this significant commitment, we actively participate in the Diversity@Sea project, a focused endeavor dedicated to enhancing career opportunities for women in the maritime industry. Safety, Quality and Health We are committed to creating a safe, healthy and secure workplace at sea and onshore. We are also committed to providing safe, reliable and environmentally sound transportation to our customers. Integral to meeting standards mandated by worldwide regulators and customers is a ship manager’s use of robust Safety Management Systems (“SMS”). The SMS is a framework of processes and procedures that addresses a spectrum of operational risks associated with quality, environment, health and safety. The SMS is certified by the International Safety Management Code (“ISM Code”), promulgated by the IMO and the International Standards Organization (“ISO”), and meets ISO 9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) requirements. To support a culture of transparency, accountability and compliance, we have an open reporting system on all of our ships, whereby seafarers can anonymously report possible violations of our or our third-party technical and commercial manager’s policies and procedures. All open reports are investigated, and appropriate actions are taken when necessary. Our commitment to safety also extends to our continued response to changes in how we work and collaborate shoreside. In 2023, we have maintained the hybrid work schedule introduced in 2022, taking into account collaboration, convenience and work-life balance for our shoreside employees. 9 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents COMPETITION The shipping industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with other owners of International Flag tankers, including other independent shipowners, integrated oil companies, state-owned entities with their own fleets, and oil traders with logistical operations. Our vessels compete with all other vessels of a size and type required by the customer that can be available at the date and location specified. In the spot market, competition is based primarily on price, cargo quantity and cargo type, although charterers are selective with respect to the quality of the vessels they hire considering other key factors such as the reliability, age and quality and efficiency of operations and experience of crews. In the time charter market, factors such as the age and quality of the vessel and the efficiency of its operation and reputation of its owner and operator tend to be even more significant when competing for business. Our lightering business competes against a small number of other market participants, both in the United States and in other jurisdictions in which we operate. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SECURITY MATTERS RELATING TO BULK SHIPPING Government regulation significantly affects the operation of the Company’s vessels. INSW’s vessels operate in a heavily regulated environment and are subject to international conventions and international, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the countries in which such vessels operate or are registered. The Company’s vessels undergo regular and rigorous safety inspections and audits which are conducted by the ships’ third-party managers. In addition, a variety of governmental and private entities subject the Company’s vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include USCG, local port state control authorities (harbor master or equivalent), coastal states, Classification Societies, flag state administration (country of registry) and customers, particularly major oil companies and petroleum terminal operators. Certain of these entities require INSW to obtain permits, licenses and certificates for the operation of the Company’s vessels. Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require INSW to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of the Company’s vessels. The Company believes that the heightened level of environmental, health, safety and quality awareness among various stakeholders, including lenders, insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers, is leading to greater safety and other regulatory requirements and a more stringent inspection regime on all vessels. The Company is required to maintain operating standards for all of its vessels emphasizing operational safety and quality, environmental stewardship, preventive planned maintenance, continuous training of its officers and crews and compliance with international and U.S. regulations. INSW believes that the operation of its vessels is in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, because such laws and regulations are changed frequently, and new laws and regulations impose new or increasingly stringent requirements, INSW cannot predict the cost of complying with requirements beyond those that are currently in force. The impact of future regulatory requirements on operations or the resale value or useful lives of its vessels may result in substantial additional costs in meeting new legal and regulatory requirements. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors— Risks Related to Our Company — Risks relating to legal and regulatory matters, compliance with complex laws, regulations and, in particular, environmental laws or regulations, including those relating to the emission of greenhouse gases, may adversely affect INSW’s business.” International and U.S. Greenhouse Gas Regulations In February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (commonly called the Kyoto Protocol) became effective. Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases, generally referred to as greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), which contribute to global warming. The Kyoto Protocol, which was adopted by about 190 countries, commits its parties by setting internationally binding emission reduction targets. In December 2012, the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol was adopted to further extend the Kyoto Protocol’s GHG emissions reductions through 2020. In December 2015, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”) forged a new international framework (the “Paris Agreement”) that became effective in November 2016, after it had been ratified by a sufficient number of countries. The Paris Agreement sets a goal of holding the increase in global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursuing efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius, to be achieved by aiming to reach a global peaking of GHG emissions as soon as possible. To meet these objectives, the participating countries, acting individually or jointly, are to develop and implement successive “nationally determined contributions.” The countries assessed their collective programs toward achieving 10 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents the goals of the Paris Agreement in 2023 and agreed to reassess such programs every five years thereafter, referred to as the global stock take, and subsequently are to update and enhance their actions on climate change. The Paris Agreement does not specifically require controls on shipping or other industries, but it is possible that countries or groups of countries will seek to impose such controls as they implement the Paris Agreement. In November 2021, at UNFCCC’s COP26 in Glasgow, new initiatives to incorporate shipping in the climate change framework were proposed. These proposals remain either voluntary among countries or represent efforts towards building consensus for further work within the maritime industry. In particular, at COP26, a coalition of 19 countries including the United Kingdom and the United States signed the Clydebank Declaration to support and facilitate the establishment of at least six green shipping corridors – zero emission maritime routes between two or more ports -- by 2025, with a view toward increasing the number of green corridors over the longer term. The Declaration noted that voluntary participation by operators would be essential. In 2014, IMO’s third study of GHG emissions from the global shipping fleet predicted that, in the absence of appropriate policies, GHG emissions from ships may increase by 50% to 250% by 2050 due to expected growth in international seaborne trade. Methane emissions are projected to increase rapidly (albeit from a low base) as the share of LNG in the fuel mix increases. With respect to energy efficiency measures, the Marine Environmental Protection Committee (“MEPC”) adopted guidelines on the Energy Efficiency Design Index (“EEDI”), which reflects the primary fuel for the calculation of the attained EEDI for ships having dual fuel engines using LNG and liquid fuel oil (see discussion below). IMO is committed to developing limits on greenhouse gases from international shipping and is working on proposed mandatory technical and operational measures to achieve these limits. In April 2018, IMO adopted an initial strategy on the reduction of GHG emissions from ships, with the ultimate goal of eliminating GHG emissions from international shipping as soon as possible during this century. More specifically, under the identified “levels of ambition,” the initial strategy envisages the halt of the growth in GHG emissions from international shipping as soon as possible and then the reduction of the total annual GHG emissions by at least 50% by 2050 compared to 2008 levels. In 2019, IMO launched a project for an initial two-year period to initiate and promote global efforts to demonstrate and test technical solutions for reducing GHG emissions and improve energy efficiency throughout the maritime sector. In 2020, IMO issued its Fourth GHG Study, which further refined IMO’s understanding of maritime greenhouse gas emissions and reported updated projections that in 2050 GHG emissions will increase from 0 to 50% over 2018 levels, which is equal to 90-130% of 2008 levels. At the MEPC 76 in June 2021, the IMO, taking into account the findings of the Fourth GHG Study, adopted short-term measures that became effective in 2023 to implement its stated goals of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from international shipping by 40% by 2030 and 70% by 2050, and GHG emissions from international shipping by 50% by 2050. The new measures will require ships to calculate their Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) and to establish their annual operational carbon intensity indicator (CII) that links the GHG emissions to the amount of cargo carried over distance traveled. Ships with low ratings are required to submit corrective action plans. In 2011, the European Commission established a working group on shipping to provide input to the European Commission in its work to develop and assess options for the inclusion of international maritime transport in the GHG reduction commitment of the European Union (“EU”). The Measure, Report and Verify (“MRV”) Regulation was adopted on April 29, 2015 and created an EU-wide framework for the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport. The MRV Regulation requires large ships (over 5,000 gross tons) calling at EU ports from January 1, 2018, to collect and later publish verified annual data on carbon dioxide emissions. IMO has developed similar MRV regulations that became effective on March 1, 2018 and the first reporting period was for the full year 2019. In July 2021, the EU issued draft legislation that from 2023 to 2026 would phase in GHG emissions from shipping into its established Emissions Trading Scheme (“ETS”) and require the purchase of allowances reflecting the emissions. In December 2022, the EU Council and Parliament agreed to include maritime shipping emissions in the EU ETS, with a gradual introduction of obligations for shipping companies to surrender allowances: 40% for verified emissions from 2024, 70% for 2025 and 100% for 2026. It was also agreed to include non-carbon dioxide emissions (methane and nitrous oxide) in the MRV scheme from 2024 and in the EU ETS from 2026. The Company cannot predict the specific impacts of the EU ETS on the shipping industry as a whole and on the Company at this time. In the United States, pursuant to U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2007 and 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has authority to regulate GHG emissions under the U.S. Clean Air Act. Although the EPA has promulgated certain regulations relating to GHG emissions, to date the regulations proposed and enacted by the EPA have not involved ocean-going vessels. However, the current administration has stated that GHG emissions from shipping are a priority and that the United States will be participating more actively in international efforts including the IMO’s. 11 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Future passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, EU, United States or other countries where INSW operates that restrict emissions of GHGs could require significant additional capital and/or operating expenditures and could have operational impacts on INSW’s business. Although we cannot predict such expenditures and impacts with certainty at this time, they may be material to INSW’s results of operations. International Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards Liability Standards and Limits Many countries have ratified and follow the liability plan adopted by the IMO and set out in the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969 (the "1969 Convention"). Some of these countries have also adopted the 1992 Protocol to the 1969 Convention (the "1992 Protocol"). Under both the 1969 Convention and the 1992 Protocol, a vessel's registered owner is strictly liable for pollution damage caused in the territory, including the territorial waters (and in the exclusive economic zone under the 1992 Protocol) of a contracting state by discharge of persistent oil, subject to certain complete defenses. Both instruments apply to all seagoing vessels carrying oil in bulk as cargo. These instruments also limit the liability of the shipowner under certain circumstances. As these instruments calculate liability in terms of a basket of currencies, the figures in this section are converted into U.S. dollars based on currency exchange rates on January 2, 2024 and are approximate. Actual dollar amounts are used in this section “Liability Standards and Limits” and in “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards - Liability Standards and Limits” below. Under the 1969 Convention, except where the pollution damage resulted from the actual fault or privity of the owner, its liability is limited to $179 per ton of the vessel’s tonnage, with a maximum liability of $18.7 million. Under the 1992 Protocol, the liability of the owner is limited to $4.0 million for a ship not exceeding 5,000 units of tonnage (a unit of measurement for the total enclosed spaces within a vessel) and $603 per gross ton thereafter, with a maximum liability of $80.0 million. Under the 1992 Protocol, the owner's liability is limited except where the pollution damage results from its personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such damage, or recklessly and with knowledge that such damage would probably result. Under the 2000 amendments to the 1992 Protocol, which became effective on November 1, 2003, liability is limited to $6.0 million plus $845 for each additional gross ton over 5,000 for vessels of 5,000 to 140,000 gross tons, with a maximum liability of $120.1 million subject to the exceptions discussed above for the 1992 Protocol. Vessels trading to states that are parties to these instruments must provide evidence of insurance covering the liability of the owner. The Company believes that its P&I insurance will cover any liability under the plan adopted by the IMO. See the discussion of insurance in “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards-Liability Standards and Limits” below. The United States is not a party to the 1969 Convention or the 1992 Protocol. See “U.S. Environmental and Safety Restrictions and Regulations” below. In other jurisdictions where the 1969 Convention has not been adopted, various legislative schemes or common law govern, and liability is imposed either on the basis of fault or in a manner similar to that convention. The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001, which was adopted on March 23, 2001 and became effective on November 21, 2008, is a separate convention adopted to ensure that adequate, prompt and effective compensation is available to persons who suffer damage caused by spills of oil when used as fuel by vessels. The convention applies to damage caused to the territory, including the territorial sea, and exclusive economic zones, of states that are party to it. Vessels operating internationally are subject to it if sailing within the territories of those countries that have implemented its provisions (which does not include the United States). Key features of this convention are compulsory insurance or other financial security for vessels over 1,000 gross tons to cover the liability of the registered owner for pollution damage and direct action against the insurer. The Company believes that its vessels comply with these requirements. Other International Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards Under the ISM Code, promulgated by the IMO, vessel operators are required to develop a safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy describing how the objectives of a functional safety management system will be met. The third-party managers of INSW’s vessels, have safety management systems for the Company’s fleet, with instructions and procedures for the safe operation of its vessels, reporting accidents and non-conformities, internal audits and management reviews and responding to emergencies, as well as defined levels of responsibility. The ISM Code requires a Document of Compliance (“DoC”) to be obtained for the company responsible for operating the vessel and a Safety Management 12 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Certificate (“SMC”) to be obtained for each vessel that such company operates. Once issued, these certificates are valid for a maximum of five years. The company operating the vessel in turn must undergo an annual internal audit and an external verification audit in order to maintain the DoC. In accordance with the ISM Code, each vessel must also undergo an annual internal audit at intervals not to exceed twelve months and vessels must undergo an external verification audit twice in a five-year period. The Company’s third-party managers have DoCs for their offices. The SMC is issued after verifying that the company responsible for operating the vessel and its shipboard management operate in accordance with the approved safety management system. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless its operator has been awarded a DoC issued by the administration of that vessel’s flag state or as otherwise permitted under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (“SOLAS”). IMO regulations also require owners and operators of vessels to adopt Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plans (“SOPEPs”). Periodic training and drills for response personnel and for vessels and their crews are required. In addition to SOPEPs, INSW has adopted Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plans, which cover potential releases not only of oil but of any noxious liquid substances. Noncompliance with the ISM Code and other IMO regulations may subject the shipowner or charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. For example, the USCG and EU authorities have indicated that vessels not in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited from trading to United States and EU ports. The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (“BWM Convention”) is designed to protect the marine environment from the introduction of non-native (alien) species as a result of the carrying of ships’ ballast water from one place to another. The introduction of non-native species has been identified as one of the top five threats to biological diversity. Expanding seaborne trade and traffic have exacerbated the threat. Tankers must take on ballast water in order to maintain their stability and draft and must discharge the ballast water when they load their next cargo. When emptying the ballast water, which they carried from the previous port, they may release organisms and pathogens that have been identified as being potentially harmful in the new environment. The BWM Convention defines a discharge standard consisting of maximum allowable levels of critical invasive species, which standard is met by installing treatment systems that render the invasive species non-viable. In addition, each vessel is required to have on board a valid International Ballast Water Management Certificate, a Ballast Water Management Plan and a Ballast Water Record Book. INSW’s vessels are subject to other international, national and local ballast water management regulations (including those described below under “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards”). INSW complies with these regulations through ballast water management plans implemented on each of the vessels in its fleet. To meet existing and anticipated ballast water treatment requirements, including those contained in the BWM Convention, INSW has a fleetwide action plan to comply with IMO, EPA, USCG and possibly more stringent U.S. state mandates as they are implemented and become effective, which may require the installation and use of costly control technologies. Compliance with the ballast water requirements effective under the BWM Convention and other regulations may have material impacts on INSW’s operations and financial results, as discussed below under “U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards-Other U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards.” Other EU Legislation and Regulations The EU has adopted legislation that: (1) bans manifestly sub-standard vessels (defined as those over 15 years old that have been detained by port authorities at least twice in the course of the preceding 24 months) from European waters, creates an obligation for port states to inspect at least 25% of vessels using their ports annually and provides for increased surveillance of vessels posing a high risk to maritime safety or the marine environment, and (2) provides the EU with greater authority and control over Classification Societies, including the ability to seek to suspend or revoke the authority of negligent societies. INSW believes that none of its vessels meet the definitions of a "sub-standard" vessel contained in the EU legislation. EU directives require EU member states to introduce criminal sanctions for illicit ship-source discharges of polluting substances (e.g., from tank cleaning operations) which result in deterioration in the quality of water and has been committed with intent, recklessness or serious negligence. Certain member states of the EU, by virtue of their national legislation, already impose criminal sanctions for pollution events under certain circumstances. The Company cannot predict what additional legislation or regulations, if any, may be promulgated by the EU or any other country or authority, or how these might impact INSW. 13 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents International Air Emission Standards Annex VI to MARPOL (“Annex VI”) sets limits on sulfur oxide (“SOx”) and nitrogen oxide (“NOx”) emissions from ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. Annex VI also regulates shipboard incineration and the emission of volatile organic compounds from tankers. Under Annex VI, the global cap on the sulfur content of fuel oil is currently 0.50% and the sulfur content of fuel oil for vessels operating in designated Emission Control Areas (“ECAs”) is 0.1%. Currently designated ECAs are the Baltic Sea area, the North Sea area, the North American area (covering designated coastal areas off the United States and Canada) and the United States Caribbean Sea area (around Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands). For vessels over 400 gross tons, Annex VI imposes various survey and certification requirements. The U.S. Maritime Pollution Prevention Act of 2008 amended the U.S. Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships to provide for the adoption of Annex VI. In October 2008, the U.S. ratified Annex VI, which came into force in the United States on January 8, 2009. In addition to Annex VI, there are regional mandates in ports and certain territorial waters within the EU, Turkey, China and Norway, for example, regarding reduced SOx emissions. These requirements establish maximum allowable limits for sulfur content in fuel oils used by vessels when operating within certain areas and waters and while “at berth.” In December 2012, an EU directive that aligned the EU requirements with Annex VI entered into force. For vessels at berth in EU ports, sulfur content of fuel oil is limited to 0.1%. For vessels operating in SOx Emission Control Areas (“SECAs”), sulfur content of fuel oil is limited to 0.1%. For vessels operating outside SECAs, sulfur content of fuel oil is limited to 0.5%. Alternatively, emission abatement methods are permitted as long as they continuously achieve reductions of SOx emissions that are at least equivalent to those obtained using compliant marine fuels. More stringent Tier III emission limits are applicable to engines installed on a ship constructed on or after January 1, 2016 operating in ECAs. NOx emission Tier III standards came into force on January 1, 2016 in ECAs. Additional air emission requirements under Annex VI mandate the development of Volatile Organic Compound (“VOC”) Management Plans for tank vessels and certain gas ships. The Company believes that its vessels are compliant with the current requirements of Annex VI and that those of its vessels that operate in the EU, Turkey, China, Norway and elsewhere are also compliant with the regional mandates applicable there. However, the Company anticipates that, in the next several years, compliance with the increasingly stringent requirements of Annex VI and other conventions, laws and regulations imposing air emission standards that have already been adopted or that may be adopted will require substantial additional capital and/or operating expenditures and could have operational impacts on INSW’s business. Although INSW cannot predict such expenditures and impacts with certainty at this time, they may be material to INSW’s financial statements. SOLAS From January 1, 2014, various amendments to the SOLAS conventions came into force, including an amendment to Chapter VI of SOLAS, which prohibits the blending of bulk liquid cargoes during sea passage and the production process on board ships. This prohibition does not preclude the master of the vessel from undertaking cargo transfers for the safety of the ship or protection of the marine environment. MARPOL Effective March 1, 2018, pursuant to an amendment to MARPOL Annex V, shippers are required to determine whether or not their cargo is hazardous and classify it in line with the criteria of the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification. Vessels are required to maintain a new format garbage record book, which is divided into two parts: cargo residues and garbage other than cargo residues. The cargo residues part must be further divided into hazardous and non-hazardous to the marine environment cargo. More stringent discharge requirements apply to hazardous cargo residues. U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards The United States regulates the shipping industry with an extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental protection and cleanup of oil spills, consisting primarily of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). OPA 90 affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade with the United States or its territories or possessions, or whose vessels operate in the waters of the United States, which include the U.S. 14 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents territorial sea and the 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone around the United States. CERCLA applies to the discharge of hazardous substances (other than oil) whether on land or at sea. Both OPA 90 and CERCLA impact the Company’s operations. Liability Standards and Limits Under OPA 90, vessel owners, operators and bareboat or demise charterers are "responsible parties" who are liable, without regard to fault, for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages, including property and natural resource damages and economic loss without physical damage to property, arising from oil spills and pollution from their vessels. On December 9, 2022, USCG issued a final rule, effective March 23, 2023, increasing the limits of OPA 90 liability with respect to (i) tanker vessels with a qualifying double hull to the greater of $2,500 per gross ton or approximately $21.5 million per vessel that is over 3,000 gross tons; and (ii) non-tanker vessels, to the greater of $1,300 per gross ton or approximately $1.1 million per vessel. The statute specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of pollutants within their waters. In some cases, states that have enacted this type of legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations defining vessel owners’ responsibilities under these laws. CERCLA, which applies to owners and operators of vessels, contains a similar liability regime and provides for cleanup, removal and natural resource damages associated with discharges of hazardous substances (other than oil). Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5 million. These limits of liability do not apply, however, where the incident is caused by violation of applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulations, or by the responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct. Similarly, these limits do not apply if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperate and assist in connection with the substance removal activities. OPA 90 and CERCLA each preserve the right to recover damages under existing law, including maritime tort law. OPA 90 also requires owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the USCG evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet the limit of their potential strict liability under the statute. The USCG enacted regulations requiring evidence of financial responsibility consistent with the previous limits of liability described above for OPA 90 and CERCLA. Under the regulations, evidence of financial responsibility may be demonstrated by insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, guaranty or an alternative method subject to approval by the Director of the USCG National Pollution Funds Center. Under OPA 90 regulations, an owner or operator of more than one vessel is required to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility for the entire fleet in an amount equal only to the financial responsibility requirement of the vessel having the greatest maximum strict liability under OPA 90 and CERCLA. INSW has provided the requisite guarantees and has received certificates of financial responsibility from the USCG for each of its vessels required to have one. INSW has insurance for each of its vessels with pollution liability insurance in the amount of $1 billion. However, a catastrophic spill could exceed the insurance coverage available, in which event there could be a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. In addition to potential liability under OPA 90, vessel owners may in some instances incur liability on an even more stringent basis under state law in the particular state where the spillage occurred. The State of California’s Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act requires vessels of a specified size that operate in California waters to have a California State certificate of financial responsibility (COFR) equal to at least $2 billion and imposes certain criminal fines in the event of an oil spill. Other U.S. Environmental and Safety Regulations and Standards OPA 90 also amended the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to require owners and operators of vessels to adopt vessel response plans, including marine salvage and firefighting plans, for reporting and responding to vessel emergencies and oil spill scenarios up to a "worst case" scenario and to identify and ensure, through contracts or other approved means, the availability of necessary private response resources to respond to a “worst case discharge.” The plans must include contractual commitments with clean-up response contractors and salvage and marine firefighters in order to ensure an immediate response to an oil spill/vessel emergency. Each vessel has an USCG approved plan on file with the USCG and onboard the vessel. These plans are regularly reviewed and updated. OPA 90 requires training programs and periodic drills for shore-side staff and response personnel and for vessels and their crews. INSW’s third-party technical managers conduct such required training programs and periodic drills. OPA 90 does not prevent individual U.S. states from imposing their own liability regimes with respect to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries. In fact, most U.S. states that border a navigable waterway have enacted environmental pollution laws that impose strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous substance. These laws are in some cases more stringent than U.S. federal law. 15 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents In addition, the U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in U.S. navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under the more recent OPA 90 and CERCLA, discussed above. At the federal level in the United States, ballast water management is subject to two separate, partially interrelated regulatory regimes. One is administered by the USCG under the National Aquatic Nuisance and Control Act and National Invasive Species Act, and the other is administered by the EPA under the CWA. Under the USCG’s final rule on ballast water management for the control of nonindigenous species in U.S. waters, which generally is in line with the requirements set out in the BWM Convention, the treatment systems for domestic and foreign vessels operating in U.S. waters must be Type Approved by the USCG. INSW’s vessels discharging ballast in U.S. waters currently have, or INSW expects such vessels will have, Type Approved treatment systems by their extended compliance dates. The discharge of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normal operation of vessels in U.S. ports also is subject to CWA permitting requirements. In accordance with the EPA’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, the Company is subject to a Vessel General Permit (“VGP”), which addresses, among other matters, the discharge of ballast water and effluents. The current VGP identifies twenty-six vessel discharge streams and establishes numeric ballast water discharge limits that generally align with the treatment technologies to be implemented under USCG’s final rule, requirements to ensure that the ballast water treatment systems are functioning correctly, and more stringent effluent limits for oil to sea interfaces and exhaust gas scrubber wastewater. The VGP contains a compliance date schedule for these requirements. The VGP standards and requirements were due for modification and renewal in December 2018, but this renewal has been postponed by the EPA with no fixed date for completion. Until a new VGP program is implemented, the current standards remain in effect. Certain of the Company’s vessels are subject to more stringent numeric discharge limits under the EPA’s VGP, even though those vessels have obtained a valid extension from the USCG for implementation of treatment technology under the final rule. The EPA has determined that it will not issue extensions under the VGP, but in December 2013 it issued an Enforcement Response Policy (“ERP”) to address this industry-wide issue. Under the ERP, the EPA states that vessels that have received an extension from the USCG, are in compliance with all of the VGP’s requirements other than the numeric discharge limits and meet certain other requirements will be entitled to a “low enforcement priority.” While INSW believes that any vessel that is or may become subject to the VGP’s numeric discharge limits during the pendency of a USCG extension will be entitled to such low priority treatment under the ERP no assurance can be given that they will do so. The VGP system also permits individual states and territories to impose more stringent requirements for discharges into the navigable waters of such state or territory. Certain individual states have enacted legislation or regulations addressing hull cleaning and ballast water management. For example, California has adopted extensive requirements for more stringent effluent limits and discharge monitoring and testing requirements with respect to discharges in its waters. Following an assessment by the California State Lands Commission of the current technology for meeting ballast water management standards, California extended the deadline for compliance with stringent interim standards to 2030 and the deadline for final “zero detect” standards to 2040. In the interim, the California State Lands Commission incorporated the federal ballast water discharge standards and implementation schedule into California law and established operational monitoring and recordkeeping requirements. New York State has imposed a more stringent bilge water discharge requirement for vessels in its waters than what is required by the VGP or IMO. Through its Section 401 Certification of the VGP, New York prohibits the discharge of all bilge water in its waters. New York State also requires that vessels entering its waters from outside the Exclusive Economic Zone must perform ballast water exchange in addition to treating it with a ballast water treatment system. Under the USCG Authorization Act of 2018, which includes the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (“VIDA”), the EPA is the designated government agency responsible for establishing standards for U.S. ballast water regulations and the USCG was assigned the responsibility for monitoring and enforcing those standards. VIDA reduces the scope of the VGP and is expected to align state and local discharge standards with federal standards. Ultimately, under VIDA, the discharge of ballast water in the navigable waters of the United States will no longer subject to the VGP or the CWA. In October 2020, EPA issued its proposed national standards of performance for 20 separate discharges incidental to normal vessel operations including ballast tanks and exhaust gas emission control 16 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents systems. EPA has not yet issued a final rule. The Company plans to continue to monitor the implementation of VIDA at the federal, state, and local levels. U.S. Air Emissions Standards Pursuant to MARPOL Annex VI, EPA adopted regulations implementing the provisions of Annex VI, which regulations require subject vessels to comply with the applicable Annex VI provisions when they enter U.S. ports or operate in most internal U.S. waters. The Company’s vessels are currently Annex VI compliant. Accordingly, absent any new and onerous Annex VI implementing regulations, the Company does not expect to incur material additional costs in order to comply with this convention. The U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, as amended by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 and 1990 (“CAA”), requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. INSW’s vessels are subject to vapor control and recovery requirements for certain cargoes when loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning and conducting other operations in regulated port areas. Each of the Company’s vessels operating in the transport of clean petroleum products in regulated port areas where vapor control standards are required has been outfitted with a vapor recovery system that satisfies these requirements. In addition, the EPA issued emissions standards for marine diesel engines. The EPA has implemented rules comparable to those of Annex VI to increase the control of air pollutant emissions from certain large marine engines by requiring certain new marine-diesel engines installed on U.S. registered ships to meet lower NOx standards were implemented in two phases. The newly built engine standards that became effective in 2011 required more efficient use of current engine technologies, including engine timing, engine cooling, and advanced computer controls to achieve a 15 to 25 percent NOx reduction below previous levels. More stringent long-term standards for newly built engines that applied beginning in 2016 and required the use of high efficiency emission control technology such as selective catalytic reduction to achieve NOx reductions 80 percent below the pre-2016 levels. Fuel used by all vessels operating in the North American ECA, encompassing the area extending 200 miles from the coastlines of the Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts and the eight main Hawaiian Islands, and the United States Caribbean Sea ECA, encompassing water around Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, cannot exceed 0.1% sulfur. The Company believes that its vessels are in compliance with the current requirements of the ECAs. If other ECAs are approved by the IMO or other new or more stringent requirements relating to emissions from marine diesel engines or port operations by vessels are adopted by the EPA or the states where INSW operates, compliance could require or affect the timing of significant capital and/or operating expenditures that could be material to INSW’s consolidated financial statements. The CAA also requires states to draft State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”), designed to attain national health-based air quality standards in major metropolitan and industrial areas. Where states fail to present approvable SIPs, or SIP revisions by certain statutory deadlines, the EPA is required to draft a Federal Implementation Plan. Several SIPs regulate emissions resulting from barge loading and degassing operations by requiring the installation of vapor control equipment. Where required, the Company’s vessels are already equipped with vapor control systems that satisfy these requirements. Although a risk exists that new regulations could require significant capital expenditures and otherwise increase its costs, the Company believes, based upon the regulations that have been proposed to date, that no material capital expenditures beyond those currently contemplated and no material increase in costs are likely to be required as a result of the SIPs program. Individual states have been considering their own restrictions on air emissions from engines on vessels operating within state waters. California requires certain ocean-going vessels operating within 24 nautical miles of the Californian coast to reduce air pollution by using only low-sulfur marine distillate fuel rather than bunker fuel in auxiliary diesel and diesel- electric engines, main propulsion diesel engines and auxiliary boilers. Vessels sailing within 24 miles of the California coastline whose itineraries call for them to enter any California ports, terminal facilities, or internal or estuarine waters must use marine gas oil or marine diesel oil with a sulfur content at or below 0.1% sulfur. The Company believes that its vessels that operate in California waters are in compliance with these regulations. In August 2020, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) announced expansion of its existing at-berth air emissions requirements. These changes will require that ships at berths in California ports operate with either shore power or with CARB-approved stringent emission controls on auxiliary engines and boilers. For tankers, these changes become effective in 2025 and 2027, depending on the ship type and port. The impact of these changes is not known at this time. Security Regulations and Practices 17 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Security at sea has been a concern to governments, shipping lines, port authorities and importers and exporters for years. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. In 2002, the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (“MTSA”) came into effect and the USCG issued regulations in 2003 implementing certain portions of the MTSA by requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, effective in July 2004, a new subchapter of SOLAS imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the International Ship and Port Facilities Security Code (the “ISPS Code”). The ISPS Code is applicable to all cargo vessels of 500 gross tons plus all passenger ships operating on international voyages, mobile offshore drilling units, as well as port facilities that service them. The objective of the ISPS Code is to establish the framework that allows detection of security threats and implementation of preventive measures against security incidents that can affect ships or port facilities used in international trade. Among other things, the ISPS Code requires the development of vessel security plans and compliance with flag state security certification requirements. To trade internationally, a vessel must attain an International Ship Security Certificate (“ISSC”) from a recognized security organization approved by the vessel’s flag state. The USCG regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt from MTSA vessel security measures for non-U.S. vessels that have on board a valid ISSC attesting to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. All of INSW’s vessels have developed and implemented vessel security plans that have been approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities, have obtained ISSCs and comply with applicable security requirements. The Company monitors the waters in which its vessels operate for pirate activity. Company vessels that transit areas where there is a high risk of pirate activity follow best management practices for reducing risk and preventing pirate attacks and are in compliance with protocols established by the naval coalition protective forces operating in such areas. INSPECTION BY CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES Every oceangoing vessel must be “classed” by a Classification Society. The Classification Society certifies that the vessel is “in class,” signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the Classification Society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’s country of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the Classification Society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned. The Classification Society also undertakes on request other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. These surveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case and/or to the regulations of the country concerned. For maintenance of the class certification, regular and extraordinary surveys of hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and any special equipment classed are required to be performed as follows: ● Annual Surveys. For seagoing ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery, including the electrical plant and where applicable for special equipment classed, at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate. ● Intermediate Surveys. Extended annual surveys are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically are conducted two and one-half years after commissioning and each class renewal. Intermediate surveys may be carried out between the occasions of the second or third annual survey. ● Class Renewal Surveys. Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out for the ship’s hull, machinery, including the electrical plant, and for any special equipment classed, at the intervals indicated by the character of classification for the hull. At the special survey the vessel is thoroughly examined, including ultrasonic measurements to determine the thickness of the steel structures. Should the thickness be found to be less than class requirements, the Classification Society would prescribe steel renewals. The Classification Society may grant a one-year grace period for completion of the special survey. Substantial amounts of money may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special survey if the vessel experiences excessive wear and tear. In lieu of the special survey every four or five years, depending on whether a grace period was granted, a shipowner has the option of arranging with the Classification Society for the vessel’s hull or machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, in which every part of the vessel would be surveyed within a five-year cycle. Upon a shipowner’s request, the surveys required for class renewal may be split according to an agreed schedule to extend over the entire period of class survey period. This process is referred to as continuous class renewal. 18 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Vessels are required to dry dock for inspection of the underwater hull at each intermediate survey and at each class renewal survey. For tankers less than 15 years old, Classification Societies permit for intermediate surveys in water inspections by divers in lieu of dry docking, subject to other requirements of such Classification Societies. If defects are found during any survey, the Classification Society surveyor will issue a “recommendation” which must be rectified by the vessel owner within prescribed time limits. Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as “in class” by a Classification Society that is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies, or IACS. All our vessels are currently, and we expect will continue to be, certified as being “in class” by a Classification Society that is a member of IACS. All new and secondhand vessels that we acquire must be certified as being “in class” prior to their delivery under our standard purchase contracts and memorandum of agreement. If the vessel is not certified on the date of closing, we have no obligation to take delivery of the vessel. INSURANCE Consistent with the currently prevailing practice in the industry, the Company presently carries protection and indemnity (“P&I”) insurance coverage for pollution of $1.0 billion per occurrence on every vessel in its fleet. P&I insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations (“P&I Associations”). The P&I Associations that comprise the International Group insure approximately 90% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure each association’s liabilities. Each P&I Association has capped its exposure to each of its members at approximately $8.9 billion. As a member of a P&I Association that is a member of the International Group, the Company is subject to calls payable to the P&I Associations based on its claim record as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual Associations of which it is a member, and the members of the pool of P&I Associations comprising the International Group. As of December 31, 2023, the Company was a member of four P&I Associations. Each of the Company’s vessels is insured by one of these four Associations with deductibles ranging from $0.025 million to $0.1 million per vessel per incident. While the Company has historically been able to obtain pollution coverage at commercially reasonable rates, no assurances can be given that such insurance will continue to be available in the future. The Company carries marine hull and machinery and war risk (including piracy) insurance, which includes the risk of actual or constructive total loss, for all of its vessels. The vessels are each covered up to at least their fair market value, with deductibles ranging from $0.125 million to $0.250 million per vessel per incident. The Company is self-insured for hull and machinery claims in amounts in excess of the individual vessel deductibles up to a maximum aggregate loss of $1.5 million per policy year for certain of its vessels. The Company currently maintains loss of hire insurance to cover loss of charter income resulting from accidents or breakdowns of its vessels, and the bareboat chartered vessels that are covered under the vessels’ marine hull and machinery insurance. Loss of hire insurance covers up to 60 days lost charter income per vessel per incident in excess of the first 60 days lost for each covered incident, which is borne by the Company. INCOME TAXATION OF THE COMPANY INSW is incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands and pursuant to the laws of the Marshall Islands, the Company is not subject to income tax in the Marshall Islands. All of the Company’s vessels are owned or operated by non-U.S. corporations that are subsidiaries of INSW. U.S. Income Tax The following summary of the principal U.S. income tax laws applicable to the Company, as well as the conclusions regarding certain issues of income tax law, are based on the provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), existing and proposed U.S. Treasury Department regulations, administrative rulings, pronouncements and judicial decisions, all as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. No assurance can be given that changes in or interpretation of existing laws will not occur or will not be retroactive or that anticipated future circumstances will in fact occur. INSW derives substantially all of its gross income from the use and operation of vessels in international commerce. This income principally consists of hire from time and voyage charters for the transportation of cargoes and the performance of services directly related thereto, which is referred to herein as “shipping income.” 19 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents INSW’s vessels operate in various parts of the world, including to or from U.S. ports. Shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States will be considered to be 50% derived from sources within the United States. Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the U.S. will be considered to be 100% derived from sources within the United States. INSW does not engage in transportation that gives rise to 100% U.S. source income. Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the United States and will generally not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax. In 2023 and prior years, INSW was exempt from taxation on its U.S. source shipping income under Section 883 of the Code and the corresponding Treasury regulations. For 2024 and future years, INSW will need to evaluate its qualification for exemption under Section 883 and there can be no assurance that INSW will continue to qualify for the exemption. Our qualification for the exemption under Section 883 is described in more detail under “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters — We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income, which would reduce our net income and cash flows.” To the extent INSW is unable to qualify for exemption from tax under Section 883, INSW will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation of 4% of its U.S. source shipping income on a gross basis without the benefit of deductions. Global Minimum Tax In December 2021, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) issued Model Rules for implementation of a 15% minimum tax for multinational enterprises as part of its initiative intended to address the tax challenges arising from globalization. A number of countries, including some jurisdictions in which certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are domiciled, such as the U.K. and Singapore, have agreed to adopt the OECD’s minimum tax rules and have already implemented these rules or local versions of these rules effective January 1, 2024. The phased implementation of these rules could affect INSW in 2025 with the potential for a one-year deferral. The application of the rules continues to evolve, and its outcome may alter our tax obligations in certain countries in which we operate. We continue to evaluate the impact of these rules and are currently evaluating a variety of mitigating actions to reduce the potential impact. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS This section highlights important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements made in this report or presented elsewhere by management from time to time. If any of the circumstances or events described below actually arise or occur, the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Actual dollar amounts are used in this Item 1A. “Risk Factors” section. Summary of Risk Factors The following is a summary of the risk factors you should be aware of before making a decision to invest in our common stock. This summary does not address all the risks we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks we face, can be found below in this risk factor section and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this annual report on Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock. Risks Related to Our Industry ● The highly cyclical nature of the industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates and vessel values, which could adversely affect the Company’s earnings and available cash. ● The market value of vessels fluctuates significantly, which could adversely affect INSW’s liquidity or otherwise adversely affect its financial condition. ● Declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause INSW to incur impairment charges. ● Changes in the worldwide supply of vessels or an expansion of the capacity of newly-built vessels, without a commensurate shift in demand for such vessels, may cause spot chart rates to increase or decline, affecting INSW’s revenues, profitability and cash flows, and the value of its vessels. 20 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ● Shipping is a business with inherent risks, and INSW’s insurance may not be adequate to cover its losses. ● Counterparty credit risk and constraints on capital availability may adversely affect INSW’s business. ● The state of the global financial markets may adversely impact the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms and otherwise negatively impact the Company’s business. ● INSW conducts its operations internationally, which subjects it to changing economic, political and governmental conditions that may adversely affect its business. ● Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels, terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability, including attacks against merchant vessels in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by Iran–backed Houthi militants in Yemen, could adversely affect the Company’s business. ● The war between Russia and Ukraine could adversely affect INSW’s business. ● Public health threats could adversely affect INSW’s business. Risks Related to Our Company ● INSW has incurred significant indebtedness which could affect its ability to finance its operations, pursue desirable business opportunities and successfully run its business in the future, all of which could affect INSW’s ability to fulfill its obligations under that indebtedness. ● The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and could in the future breach covenants in its credit facilities, term loans and certain vessel charters. ● INSW is a holding company and depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute funds to it in order to satisfy its financial obligations or pay dividends. ● The Company will be required to make additional capital expenditures to expand the number of vessels in its fleet and to maintain its vessels, which depend on additional financing. ● The Company depends on third-party service providers for technical and commercial management of its fleet. ● INSW’s business depends on voyage charters, and any future decrease in spot charter rates could adversely affect its earnings. ● INSW may not be able to renew Time Charters when they expire or enter into new Time Charters. ● Termination of, or a change in the nature of, INSW’s relationship with any of the commercial pools in which it participates could adversely affect its business. ● INSW may not realize the benefits it expects from past acquisitions or acquisitions or other strategic transactions it may make in the future. ● The smuggling or alleged smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto the Company’s vessels may lead to governmental claims against the Company. ● Operational costs and capital expenses will increase as the Company’s vessels age and may also increase due to unanticipated events related to secondhand vessels and the consolidation of suppliers. ● The Company is subject to credit risks with respect to its counterparties on contracts, and any failure by those counterparties to meet their obligations could cause the Company to suffer losses on such contracts, decreasing revenues and earnings. ● The Company may face unexpected drydock costs for its vessels. ● Technological innovation could reduce the Company’s charter income and the value of the Company’s vessels. ● The Company stores, processes, maintains, and transmits confidential information through information technology (“IT”) systems. Cybersecurity issues, such as security breaches and computer viruses, affecting INSW’s IT systems and those of its third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties, could disrupt INSW’s business, result in unintended disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, damage its reputation, increase its costs, and cause losses. ● INSW’s revenues are subject to seasonal variations. ● Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters ● Climate change and greenhouse emissions may adversely affect our operating results. ● Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks. ● Compliance with complex laws, regulations, and, in particular, environmental laws or regulations, including those relating to the emission of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”), may adversely affect INSW’s business. 21 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ● The employment of the Company’s vessels could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment process. ● The Company’s vessels may be directed to call on ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the United States (“U.S.”), the UN, the United Kingdom, or the EU, which could negatively affect the trading price of the Company’s common shares. ● The Company may be subject to litigation and government inquiries or investigations that, if not resolved in the Company’s favor and not sufficiently covered by insurance, could have a material adverse effect on it. ● Maritime claimants could arrest INSW’s vessels, which could interrupt cash flows. ● Governments could requisition the Company’s vessels during a period of war or emergency, which may negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operation and available cash. ● We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income, which could reduce our net income and cash flows. ● U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company”, which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders. ● Pending and future tax law changes may result in significant additional taxes to us. Risks Related to the Common Stock ● We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which may have fewer rights and protections for shareholders than under a typical jurisdiction in the United States. ● It may be difficult to serve process on or enforce a United States judgment against us, our officers and our directors because we are a foreign corporation. ● The market price of the Company’s securities may fluctuate significantly. ● Our Amended and Restated Rights Plan may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Company or changes to our management and, therefore, depress the market price of our Common Stock. ● Future offerings of debt or equity securities by the Company may materially adversely affect the share price, and future capitalization measures could lead to substantial dilution of existing shareholders’ interests in the Company. ● INSW may not continue to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock. Risks Related to Our Industry The highly cyclical nature of the industry may lead to volatile changes in charter rates and vessel values, which could adversely affect the Company’s earnings and available cash. INSW depends on short duration, or “spot,” charters, for a significant portion of its revenues, which exposes INSW to fluctuations in market conditions. In the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, INSW derived approximately 91%, 96% and 81%, respectively, of its TCE revenues in the spot market. The tanker industry is both cyclical and volatile in terms of charter rates and profitability. Fluctuations in charter rates and vessel values result from changes in supply and demand both for tanker capacity and for oil and oil products. Factors affecting these changes in supply and demand are generally outside of the Company’s control. The nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are unpredictable and could adversely affect the values of the Company’s vessels or result in significant fluctuations in the amount of charter revenues the Company earns, which could result in significant volatility in INSW’s quarterly results and cash flows, and the Company’s ability to remain in compliance with financial covenants in its credit facilities. See “— The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and could in the future breach covenants in its credit facilities, term loans and certain vessel charters.” Furthermore, recent geopolitical instability and weather conditions have significantly benefitted the Company’s financial results by increasing tanker demand in 2022 and 2023. There can be no certainty as to when such geopolitical instability and weather conditions will normalize, and any such normalization could cause tanker rates to decline significantly. Factors influencing the demand for tanker capacity include: ● supply and demand for, and availability of, energy resources such as oil, oil products and natural gas, which affect customers’ need for vessel capacity; ● global and regional economic and political conditions, including armed conflicts, terrorist activities and strikes, that among other things could impact the supply of oil, as well as trading patterns and the demand for various vessel types; 22 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ● regional availability of refining capacity and inventories; ● changes in the production levels of crude oil (including in particular production by OPEC, the United States and other key producers); ● weather and natural disasters, including the continuing drought in Panama, reducing water levels in the Panama Canal and thereby decreasing the daily number of vessels permitted to transit the canal, resulting in delays in crossing the canal or extending their voyages by going around Cape Horn; ● international sanctions, embargoes, import and export restrictions or nationalizations and wars, including the current Russia – Ukraine war and attacks by Iran – backed Houthi militants based in Yemen; ● developments in international trade generally; ● changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in the distances that cargoes are transported, changes in the price of crude oil and changes to the West Texas Intermediate and Brent Crude Oil pricing benchmarks; ● environmental and other legal and regulatory developments and concerns; ● government subsidies of shipbuilding; ● construction or expansion of new or existing pipelines or railways; and ● competition from alternative sources of energy. Factors influencing the supply of vessel capacity include: ● the number of newbuilding deliveries; ● the recycling rate of older vessels; ● environmental and maritime regulations; ● the number of vessels being used for storage or as FSO service vessels; ● the number of vessels that are removed from service; ● changes in the number of vessels ceasing to comply with sanctions imposed by the U.S., the UK and the EU, which changes either decrease or increase the number of vessels that participate in sanctions compliant trading; ● availability and pricing of other energy sources for which tankers can be used or to which construction capacity may be dedicated; and ● port or canal congestion and weather delays. Many of the factors that influence the demand for tanker capacity will also, in the longer term, effectively influence the supply of tanker capacity, since decisions to build new capacity, invest in capital repairs, or to retain in service older obsolescent capacity are influenced by the general state of the marine transportation industry from time to time. If the number of new ships of a particular class delivered exceeds the number of vessels of that class being recycled, available capacity in that class will increase. The newbuilding order book of all classes of tankers (representing vessels in various stages of planning or construction that will be delivered in the future) equaled approximately 7%, 4% and 7% as of each of December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. The market value of vessels fluctuates significantly, which could adversely affect INSW’s liquidity or otherwise adversely affect its financial condition. The market value of vessels has fluctuated over time. The fluctuation in market value of vessels over time is based upon various factors, including: ● age of the vessel; ● general economic and market conditions affecting the tanker industry, including the availability of vessel financing; ● number of vessels in the world fleet; ● types and sizes of vessels available; ● changes in trading patterns affecting demand for particular sizes and types of vessels; ● cost of newbuildings; ● prevailing level of charter rates; ● environmental and maritime regulations; ● competition from other shipping companies and from other modes of transportation; ● technological advances in vessel design and propulsion and overall vessel efficiency; and ● ability to utilize less expensive fuels. 23 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents During 2023, tanker values increased, primarily because of higher TCE rates (resulting in part from geopolitical conflicts), greater residual values of tankers because of higher steel prices, and limited shipyard capacity to construct tankers because of orders for other categories of vessels such as bulk carriers, container ships and LNG carriers. If INSW sells a vessel at a sale price that is less than the vessel’s carrying amount on the Company’s financial statements, INSW will incur a loss on the sale and a reduction in earnings and surplus. Declines in the values of the Company’s vessels could adversely affect the Company’s compliance with its loan covenants. Declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause INSW to incur impairment charges. The Company evaluates events and changes in circumstances that have occurred to determine whether they indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessel assets might not be recoverable. This review for potential impairment indicators and projection of future cash flows related to the vessels is complex and requires the Company to make various estimates, including with respect to future freight rates, earnings from the vessels, market appraisals and discount rates. All of these items have historically been volatile. The Company evaluates the recoverable amount of a vessel asset as the sum of its undiscounted estimated future cash flows. If the recoverable amount is less than the vessel’s carrying amount, the vessel’s carrying amount is then compared to its estimated fair value. If the vessel’s carrying amount is less than its fair value, it is deemed impaired. The carrying values of the Company’s vessels may differ significantly from their fair market value. The Company did not record any vessel impairment charges during 2023. Changes in the worldwide supply of vessels or an expansion of the capacity of newly-built tankers, without a commensurate shift in demand for such vessels, may cause spot charter rates to increase or decline, affecting INSW’s revenues, profitability and cash flows, and the value of its vessels. Changes in vessel supply have historically been a driver of both spot market rates and the overall cyclicality of the maritime industry. When the number of new ships of a particular class delivered exceeds the number of vessels of that class being recycled over a period, available capacity in that class increases. Although vessel recycling levels over any particular period will depend on various factors, including charter rates and recycling prices, the newbuilding order book (i.e., vessels in various stages of planning or construction that will be delivered in the future) represented approximately 7% and 4% of the existing world tanker fleet as of each of December 31, 2023 and 2022. In addition, if newly built tankers have more capacity than the tankers being recycled or otherwise removed from the active world fleet, overall tanker capacity will expand. Supply is also affected by the number of tankers being used for floating storage (which are thus not available to transport crude oil or petroleum products). Although currently only a relatively small percentage of the world tanker fleet is being used for storage at sea, that percentage varies over time, and is affected by expectations of changes in the price of oil and petroleum products, with vessel use generally increasing when prices are expected to increase more than storage costs and generally decreasing when they are not. Any of these factors may cause both spot charter rates and the value of the INSW’s vessels to fluctuate, and may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows and financial condition. Shipping is a business with inherent risks, and INSW’s insurance may not be adequate to cover its losses. INSW’s vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost and its vessel crews and shoreside employees are at risk of injury or death because of events including, but not limited to: ● marine disasters; ● bad weather; ● mechanical failures; ● human error; ● war, terrorism and piracy; ● grounding, fire, explosions and collisions; and ● other unforeseen circumstances or events. These hazards may result in death or injury to persons; loss of revenues or property; demand for the payment of ransoms; environmental damage; higher insurance rates; damage to INSW’s customer relationships; and market disruptions, delay or rerouting, any or all of which may also subject INSW to litigation. In addition, transporting crude oil and refined petroleum products creates a risk of business interruptions due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities, labor strikes, port closings and boycotts. The operation of tankers also has unique operational risks associated with the transportation of oil. An oil spill may cause significant environmental damage and the associated costs could exceed the insurance coverage available to the Company. Compared to other types of vessels, tankers are also exposed to a higher risk of damage and loss by fire, whether ignited by a terrorist attack, collision, or 24 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents other cause, due to the high flammability of the oil transported in tankers. Furthermore, any such incident could seriously damage INSW’s reputation and cause INSW either to lose business or to be less likely to be able to enter into new business (either because of customer concerns or changes in customer vetting processes). Any of these events could result in loss of revenues, decreased cash flows and increased costs. While the Company carries insurance to protect against certain risks involved in the conduct of its business, risks may arise against which the Company is not adequately insured. For example, a catastrophic spill could exceed INSW’s $1.0 billion per vessel insurance coverage and have a material adverse effect on its operations. In addition, INSW may not be able to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future, and INSW cannot guarantee that any particular claim will be paid by its insurers. In the past, new and stricter environmental regulations have led to higher costs for insurance covering environmental damage or pollution, and new regulations could lead to similar increases or even make this type of insurance unavailable. Furthermore, even if insurance coverage is adequate to cover the Company’s losses, INSW may not be able to timely obtain a replacement ship or may suffer other consequential harm or difficulty in the event of a loss. INSW may also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on its own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which INSW obtains insurance coverage for tort liability. INSW’s payment of these calls could result in significant expenses which would reduce its profits and cash flows or cause losses. Counterparty credit risk and constraints on capital availability may adversely affect INSW’s business. Certain of the Company’s customers, financial lenders and suppliers may suffer material adverse impacts on their financial condition that could make them unable or unwilling to comply with their contractual commitments, including the refusal or inability to pay charter hire to INSW or an inability or unwillingness to lend funds. While INSW seeks to monitor the financial condition of its customers, financial lenders and suppliers, the availability and accuracy of information about the financial condition of such entities and the actions that INSW may take to reduce possible losses resulting from the failure of such entities to comply with their contractual obligations is limited. Any such failure could have a material adverse effect on INSW’s revenues, profitability and cash flows. The Company also faces other potential constraints on capital relating to counterparty credit risk and constraints on INSW’s ability to borrow funds. See also “— Risks Related to Our Company — The Company is subject to credit risks with respect to its counterparties on contracts, and any failure by those counterparties to meet their obligations could cause the Company to suffer losses on such contracts, decreasing revenues and earnings” and “— Risks Related to Our Company — INSW has incurred significant indebtedness which could affect its ability to finance its operations, pursue desirable business opportunities and successfully run its business in the future, all of which could affect INSW’s ability to fulfill its obligations under that indebtedness.” The state of the global financial markets may adversely impact the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms and otherwise negatively impact the Company’s business. Global financial markets have been, and continue to be, volatile. In recent years, businesses in the global economy have faced tightening credit and deteriorating international liquidity conditions. There have been periods where there was a general decline in the willingness of banks and other financial institutions to extend credit, particularly in the shipping industry, due to regulatory pressures (e.g., Basel IV) and the historically volatile asset values of vessels, exacerbated by individual companies’ exposure to the spot market (i.e., without fixed or locked in time charter coverage). As the shipping industry is highly dependent on the availability of credit to finance and expand operations, it may be negatively affected by any such decline. Also, concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically may increase the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets. Lenders may also enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt at all or on terms similar to current debt and reduce, and in some cases cease to provide funding to borrowers. Due to these factors, additional financing may not be available if needed and to the extent required, on acceptable terms or at all. If additional financing is not available when current facilities mature, or is available only on unfavorable terms, the Company may be unable to meet its obligations as they come due or the Company may be unable to execute its business strategy, complete additional vessel acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. 25 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents INSW conducts its operations internationally, which subjects it to changing economic, political and governmental conditions that may adversely affect its business. The Company conducts its operations internationally, and its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected by changing economic, political and government conditions in the countries and regions where its vessels are employed, including: ● regional or local economic downturns; ● changes in governmental policy or regulation; ● restrictions on the transfer of funds into or out of countries in which INSW or its customers operate; ● difficulty in staffing and managing (including ensuring compliance with internal policies and controls) geographically widespread operations; ● trade relations with foreign countries in which INSW’s customers and suppliers have operations, including protectionist measures such as tariffs and import or export licensing requirements; ● general economic and political conditions, which may interfere with, among other things, the Company’s supply chain, its customers and all of INSW’s activities in a particular location; ● difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations in non-U.S. jurisdictions and the collection of accounts receivable from foreign accounts; ● different regulatory regimes in the various countries in which INSW operates; ● inadequate intellectual property protection in foreign countries; ● the difficulties and increased expenses in complying with multiple and potentially conflicting U.S. and foreign laws, regulations, security rules, product approvals and trade standards, anti-bribery laws, government sanctions and restrictions on doing business with certain nations or specially designated nationals; ● import and export duties and quotas; ● demands for improper payments from port officials or other government officials; ● U.S. and foreign customs, tariffs and taxes; ● currency exchange controls, restrictions and fluctuations, which could result in reduced revenue and increased operating expense; ● international incidents; ● transportation delays or interruptions; ● local conflicts, acts of war, terrorist attacks or military conflicts; ● changes in oil prices or disruptions in oil supplies that could substantially affect global trade, the Company’s customers’ operations and the Company’s business; ● the imposition of taxes by flag states, port states and jurisdictions in which INSW or its subsidiaries are incorporated or where its vessels operate; and ● expropriation of INSW’s vessels. The occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. Additionally, protectionist developments, or the perception they may occur, may have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions, and may significantly reduce global trade. Governments may turn to trade barriers to protect their domestic industries against foreign imports, thereby depressing shipping demand. In particular, leaders in the United States have indicated the United States may seek to implement more protective trade measures and to withdraw from certain international trade treaties, including with China. Increasing trade protectionism may cause an increase in the cost of goods exported from regions globally, particularly the Asia-Pacific region and the risks associated with exporting goods, which may significantly affect the quantity of goods to be shipped, shipping time schedules, voyage costs and other associated costs. Further, increased tensions may adversely affect oil demand, which would have an adverse effect on shipping rates. INSW must comply with complex U.S. and non-U.S. laws and regulations, such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and other local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials; anti-money laundering laws; and competition regulations. Moreover, the shipping industry is generally considered to present elevated risks in these areas. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines and penalties, criminal sanctions, restrictions on the Company’s business operations and on the 26 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Company’s ability to transport cargo to one or more countries, and could also materially affect the Company’s brand, ability to attract and retain employees, international operations, business and operating results. Although INSW has policies and procedures designed to achieve compliance with these laws and regulations, INSW cannot be certain that its employees, contractors, joint venture partners or agents will not violate these policies and procedures. INSW’s operations may also subject its employees and agents to extortion attempts. Changes in fuel prices may adversely affect profits. Fuel is a significant expense in the Company’s shipping operations when vessels are under voyage charter. Accordingly, an increase in the price of fuel may adversely affect the Company’s profitability if these increases cannot be passed onto customers. The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside the Company’s control, including geopolitical developments; supply and demand for oil and gas; actions by OPEC, and other oil and gas producers; war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions; regional production patterns; and environmental concerns and regulations, including requirements to use certain fuels that are more costly. Terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability can affect the tanker industry, which could adversely affect INSW’s business. Terrorist attacks, the outbreak of war, or the existence of international hostilities could damage the world economy, adversely affect the availability of and demand for crude oil and petroleum products and adversely affect both the Company’s ability to charter its vessels and the charter rates payable under any such charters. In addition, INSW operates in a sector of the economy that is likely to be adversely impacted by the effect of political instability, terrorist or other attacks, war or international hostilities. Political instability has also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region and most recently in the Black Sea in connection with the war between Russia and Ukraine and in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden in connection with the Israel/Gaza conflict resulting from attacks by Iran-backed Houthi militants based in Yemen, respectively. These factors could also increase the costs to the Company of conducting its business, particularly crew, insurance and security costs, and prevent or restrict the Company from obtaining insurance coverage, all of which have a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In April 2019, Iran publicly threatened that it would interrupt the flow of oil through the Straits of Hormuz, the entrance to the Arabian Gulf. Commencing in May 2019, several vessels in the Arabian Gulf have been attacked, which attacks the United States has attributed to Iranian forces, and at least two vessels have been seized by Iran. Further the war between Russia and Ukraine and the Israel/Gaza conflict have resulted in attacks on commercial vessels in the Black Sea, Red Sea and Gulf of Aden in the 2022 – 2024 period. None of these attacks or seizures have involved the Company’s vessels. To date, these attacks and vessel seizures, while increasing the costs of the Company conducting its business to a limited extent, have not had a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow but no assurance can be given that continued vessel attacks or seizures will not do so. Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect the Company’s business. The threat of pirate attacks on seagoing vessels remains, particularly off the west coast of Africa and in the South China Sea. If piracy attacks result in regions in which the Company’s vessels are deployed being characterized by insurers as “war risk” zones, as the Gulf of Aden has been, or Joint War Committee “war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for insurance coverage could increase significantly, and such insurance coverage may become difficult to obtain. Crew costs could also increase in such circumstances due to risks of piracy attacks. In addition, while INSW believes the charterer remains liable for charter payments when a vessel is seized by pirates, the charterer may dispute this and withhold charter hire until the vessel is released. A charterer may also claim that a vessel seized by pirates was not “on-hire” for a certain number of days and it is therefore entitled to cancel the charter party, a claim the Company would dispute. The Company may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against the Company’s vessels, or an increase in the cost (or unavailability) of insurance for those vessels, could have a material adverse impact on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Such attacks may also impact the Company’s customers, which could impair their ability to make payments to the Company under their charters. 27 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Public health threats could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations and financial results. Public health threats and other highly communicable diseases, outbreaks of which have already occurred in various parts of the world near where INSW operates, could adversely impact the Company’s operations, the operations of the Company’s customers and the global economy, including the worldwide demand for crude oil and the level of demand for INSW’s services. Any quarantine of personnel, restrictions on travel to or from countries in which INSW operates, or inability to access certain areas could adversely affect the Company’s operations. Travel restrictions, operational problems or large-scale social unrest in any part of the world in which INSW operates, or any reduction in the demand for tanker services caused by public health threats in the future, may impact INSW’s operations and adversely affect the Company’s financial results. Risks Related to Our Company INSW has incurred significant indebtedness which could affect its ability to finance its operations, pursue desirable business opportunities and successfully run its business in the future, all of which could affect INSW’s ability to fulfill its obligations under that indebtedness. As of December 31, 2023, INSW had approximately $723 million of outstanding indebtedness (including finance lease obligations), net of discounts and deferred finance costs. INSW’s substantial indebtedness and interest expense could have important consequences, including: ● limiting INSW’s ability to use a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations in other areas of its business, including for working capital, capital expenditures and other general business activities, because INSW must dedicate a substantial portion of these funds to service its debt; ● to the extent INSW’s future cash flows are insufficient, requiring the Company to seek to incur additional indebtedness in order to make planned capital expenditures and other expenses or investments; ● limiting INSW’s ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions, and other expenses or investments planned by the Company; ● limiting the Company’s flexibility and ability to capitalize on business opportunities and to react to competitive pressures and adverse changes in government regulation, and INSW’s business and industry; ● limiting INSW’s ability to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness; and ● increasing INSW’s vulnerability to a downturn in its business and to adverse economic and industry conditions generally. INSW’s ability to continue to fund its obligations and to reduce or refinance debt in the future may be affected by, among other things, the age of the Company’s fleet and general economic, financial market, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors. An inability to fund the Company’s debt requirements or reduce or refinance debt in the future could have a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, for certain lease transactions, including finance leases, the Company’s ability to prepay the lease is restricted so the lease obligations may remain outstanding throughout the lease term even if it is financially advantageous for the Company to prepay the lease. Additionally, the actual or perceived credit quality of the Company’s or its pools’ charterers (as well as any defaults by them) could materially affect the Company’s ability to obtain the additional capital resources that it will require to purchase additional vessels or significantly increase the costs of obtaining such capital. The Company’s inability to obtain additional financing at an acceptable cost, or at all, could materially affect the Company’s results of operation and its ability to implement its business strategy. The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and could in the future breach covenants in its credit facilities, term loans, and certain vessel charters. The Company’s earnings, cash flow and the market value of its vessels vary significantly over time due to the cyclical nature of the tanker industry, as well as general economic and market conditions affecting the industry. As a result, the amount of debt that INSW can manage in some periods may not be appropriate in other periods and its ability to meet the financial covenants to which it is subject or may be subject in the future may vary. Additionally, future cash flow may be insufficient to meet the Company’s debt obligations and commitments. Any insufficiency could negatively impact INSW’s business. 28 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Additionally, INSW’s $750 Million Credit Facility and $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility contain certain restrictions relating to new borrowings as set forth in the relevant loan agreements. The Company’s debt facilities contain customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants including financial covenants that require the Company (i) to maintain a minimum liquidity level of the greater of $50 million and 5% of the Company’s Consolidated Indebtedness; (ii) to ensure the Company’s and its consolidated subsidiaries’ Maximum Leverage Ratio will not exceed 0.60 to 1.00 at any time; (iii) to ensure that Current Assets exceeds Current Liabilities (which is defined to exclude the current potion of Consolidated Indebtedness); and (iv) to ensure the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Collateral Vessels will not be less than 135% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loans and Revolving Loans of each Facility. Certain of the Company’s vessel leases also contain similar financial covenants. While the Company is in compliance with all of its loan covenants, a decrease in vessel values or a failure to meet collateral maintenance requirements could cause the Company to breach certain covenants in its existing credit facilities, term loans and vessel leases, or in future financing agreements that the Company may enter into from time to time. If the Company breaches such covenants and is unable to remedy the relevant breach or obtain a waiver, the Company’s lenders could accelerate its debt and lenders could foreclose on the Company’s owned vessels and the owners of certain vessels that the Company charters in could terminate such charters. A range of economic, competitive, financial, business, industry and other factors will affect future financial performance, and, accordingly, the Company’s ability to generate cash flow from operations and to pay debt and to meet the financial covenants under the Company’s debt facilities. Many of these factors, such as charter rates, economic and financial conditions in the tanker industry and the global economy or competitive initiatives of competitors, are beyond the Company’s control. If INSW does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, it may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as: ● refinancing or restructuring its debt; ● selling tankers or other assets; ● reducing or delaying investments and capital expenditures; or ● seeking to raise additional capital. Undertaking alternative financing plans, if necessary, might not allow INSW to meet its debt obligations. The Company’s ability to restructure or refinance its debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets, its access to such markets and its financial condition at that time. Any refinancing of debt could be at higher interest rates and might require the Company to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict INSW’s business operations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt instruments may restrict INSW from adopting some alternative measures. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit INSW to meet its scheduled debt service obligations. The Company’s inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, to meet the covenants of its credit agreements and term loans and/or to obtain alternative financing in such circumstances, could materially and adversely affect INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. INSW is a holding company and depends on the ability of its subsidiaries to distribute funds to it in order to satisfy its financial obligation or pay dividends. International Seaways, Inc. is a holding company, and its subsidiaries conduct all of its operations and own all of its operating assets. It has no significant assets other than the equity interests in its subsidiaries. As a result, its ability to satisfy its financial obligations or pay dividends depends on its subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to it. In addition, the terms of certain of the Company’s financing agreements restrict the ability of certain of those subsidiaries to distribute funds to International Seaways, Inc. The Company will be required to make additional capital expenditures to expand the number of vessels in its fleet and to maintain all of its vessels, which depend on additional financing. The Company’s business strategy is based in part upon the expansion of its fleet through the purchase of additional vessels at attractive points in the tanker cycle. The Company currently has newbuilding construction contracts for the purchase of four dual fuel LNG ready LR1s and an option for two additional dual fuel LNG ready LR1s which provide for installment payments of the purchase price to be made by the Company as the vessels are being built. If the Company is unable to fulfil its obligations under such contracts, the shipyard constructing such vessels may be permitted to terminate such contracts and the Company may be required to forfeit all or a portion of the down payments it made under such contracts and it may also be sued for any outstanding balance. In addition, as a vessel must be drydocked within five years of its delivery from a shipyard, with survey cycles of no more than 60 months for the first three surveys, and 30 months thereafter, not including any unexpected repairs, the Company will incur significant maintenance costs 29 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents for its existing and any newly-acquired vessels. As a result, if the Company does not utilize its vessels as planned, these maintenance costs could have material adverse effects on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. The Company depends on third-party service providers for technical and commercial management of its fleet. The Company currently outsources to third-party service providers certain management services of its fleet, including technical management, certain aspects of commercial management and crew management. In particular, the Company has entered into ship management agreements that assign technical management responsibilities to a third-party technical manager for each conventional tanker in the Company’s fleet (collectively, the “Ship Management Agreements”). The Company has also transferred commercial management of much of its fleet to certain other third-party service providers, principally commercial pools. In such outsourcing arrangements, the Company has transferred direct control over technical and commercial management of the relevant vessels, while maintaining significant oversight and audit rights, and must rely on third-party service providers to, among other things: ● comply with contractual commitments to the Company, including with respect to safety, quality and environmental compliance of the operations of the Company’s vessels; ● comply with requirements imposed by the U.S., the U.N., the U.K. and the EU (i) restricting calls on ports located in countries that are subject to sanctions and embargoes and (ii) prohibiting bribery and other corrupt practices; ● respond to changes in customer demands for the Company’s vessels; ● obtain supplies and materials necessary for the operation and maintenance of the Company’s vessels; and ● mitigate the impact of labor shortages and/or disruptions relating to crews on the Company’s vessels. The failure of third-party service providers to meet such commitments could lead to legal liability or other damages to the Company. The third-party service providers the Company has selected may not provide a standard of service comparable to that the Company would provide for such vessels if the Company directly provided such service. The Company relies on its third-party service providers to comply with applicable law, and a failure by such providers to comply with such laws may subject the Company to liability or damage its reputation even if the Company did not engage in the conduct itself. Furthermore, damage to any such third party service provider’s reputation, relationships or business may reflect on the Company directly or indirectly, and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation and business. The third-party technical managers have the right to terminate the Ship Management Agreements at any time with 90 days’ notice. If a third-party technical manager exercises that right, the Company will be required either to enter into substitute agreements with other third parties or to assume those management duties. The Company may not succeed in negotiating and entering into such agreements with other third parties and, even if it does so, the terms and conditions of such agreements may be less favorable to the Company. Furthermore, if the Company is required to dedicate internal resources to managing its fleet (including, but not limited to, hiring additional qualified personnel or diverting existing resources), that could result in increased costs and reduced efficiency and profitability. Any such changes could result in a temporary loss of customer approvals, could disrupt the Company’s business and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. INSW’s business depends on voyage charters, and any future decrease in spot charter rates could adversely affect its earnings. Voyage charters, including vessels operating in commercial pools that predominantly operate in the spot market, constituted 91% of INSW’s aggregate TCE revenues in the year ended December 31, 2023, 96% in 2022 and 81% in 2021. Accordingly, INSW’s shipping revenues are significantly affected by prevailing spot rates for voyage charters in the markets in which the Company’s vessels operate. The spot charter market may fluctuate significantly from time to time based upon tanker and oil supply and demand. The spot market is very volatile, and, in the past, there have been periods when spot charter rates have declined below the operating cost of vessels. The successful operation of INSW’s vessels in the competitive spot charter market depends on, among other things, obtaining profitable spot charters and minimizing, to the extent possible, time spent waiting for charters and time spent traveling unladen to pick up cargo. If spot charter rates decline in the future, then INSW may be unable to operate its vessels trading in the spot market profitably, or meet its other obligations, including payments on indebtedness. Furthermore, as charter rates for spot charters are fixed for a single voyage, which may last up to several weeks during periods in which spot charter rates are rising or falling, INSW will generally experience delays in realizing the benefits from or experiencing the detriments of those changes. See also Item 1, “Business — Fleet Operations — Commercial Management.” 30 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents INSW may not be able to renew Time Charters when they expire or enter into new Time Charters. INSW’s ability to renew expiring contracts or obtain new charters will depend on the prevailing market conditions at the time of renewal. As of December 31, 2023, INSW employed twelve of its vessels on time charters, with expiration dates ranging between August 2024 and April 2030. The Company’s existing time charters may not be renewed at comparable rates or if renewed or entered into, those new contracts may be at less favorable rates. In addition, there may be a gap in employment of vessels between current charters and subsequent charters. If, upon expiration of the existing time charters, INSW is unable to obtain time charters or voyage charters at desirable rates, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected. Termination of, or a change in the nature of, INSW’s relationship with any of the commercial pools in which it participates could adversely affect its business. As of December 31, 2023, 10 of the Company’s 13 VLCCs participate in the TI pool; 11 of its 13 Suezmaxes participate in the PENFIELD pool; two of the Company’s four Aframaxes participate in the Aframax International pool and its one LR2 participates in the HAFNIA pool; all seven of its LR1s participate in the PI pool; and 29 of the 35 MRs participate in the CPTA pool or NTP pool. INSW’s participation in these pools is intended to enhance the financial performance of the Company’s vessels through higher vessel utilization. Any participant in any of these pools has the right to withdraw upon notice in accordance with the relevant pool agreement. Changes in the management of, and the terms of, these pools (including as a result of changes adopted in conjunction with the implementation of the EU Emission Trading System), decreases in the number of vessels participating in these pools, or the termination of these pools, could result in increased costs and reduced efficiency and profitability for the Company. In addition, in recent years the EU has published guidelines on the application of the EU antitrust rules to traditional agreements for maritime services such as commercial pools. While the Company believes that all the commercial pools it participates in comply with EU rules, there has been limited administrative and judicial interpretation of the rules. Restrictive interpretations of the guidelines could adversely affect the ability to commercially market the respective types of vessels in commercial pools. In the highly competitive international market, INSW may not be able to compete effectively for charters. The Company’s vessels are employed in a highly competitive market. Competition arises from other vessel owners, including major oil companies, which may have substantially greater resources than INSW. Competition for the transportation of crude oil and other petroleum products depends on price, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of the vessel operator to the charterer. The Company believes that because ownership of the world tanker fleet is highly fragmented, no single vessel owner is able to influence charter rates. INSW may not realize the benefits it expects from past acquisitions or acquisitions or other strategic transactions it may make in the future. From time to time, INSW considers, and may make, acquisitions of individual vessels, groups of vessels, or shipping businesses. The success of any such acquisition will depend upon a number of factors, some of which may not be within its control. These factors include INSW’s ability to: ● identify suitable tankers and/or shipping companies for acquisitions at attractive prices, which may not be possible if asset prices rise too quickly; ● obtain financing; ● integrate any acquired tankers or businesses successfully with INSW’s then-existing operations; and ● enhance INSW’s customer base. INSW intends to finance these acquisitions by using available cash from operations and through incurrence of debt, other financing sources or bridge financing, any of which may increase its leverage ratios, or by issuing equity, which may have a dilutive impact on its existing shareholders. At any given time INSW may be engaged in a number of discussions that may result in one or more acquisitions, some of which may be material to INSW as a whole. These opportunities require confidentiality and may involve negotiations that require quick responses by INSW. Although there can be no certainty that any of these discussions will result in definitive agreements or the completion of any transactions, the announcement of any such transaction may lead to increased volatility in the trading price of INSW’s securities. 31 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Acquisitions and other transactions can also involve a number of special risks and challenges, including: ● diversion of management time and attention from the Company’s existing business and other business opportunities; ● delays in closing or the inability to close an acquisition for any reason, including third-party consents or approvals; ● any unanticipated negative impact on the Company of disclosed or undisclosed matters relating to any vessels or operations acquired; and ● assumption of debt or other liabilities of the acquired business, including litigation related to the acquired business. The success of acquisitions or strategic investments depends on the effective integration of newly acquired businesses or assets into INSW’s current operations. Such integration is subject to risks and uncertainties, including realization of anticipated synergies and cost savings, the ability to retain and attract personnel and clients, the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, and undisclosed or potential legal liabilities of the acquired company or asset. INSW may not realize the strategic and financial benefits that it expects from any of its past acquisitions, or any future acquisitions. Further, if a portion of the purchase price of a business is attributable to goodwill and if the acquired business does not perform up to expectations at the time of the acquisition, some or all of the goodwill may be written off, adversely affecting INSW’s earnings. The smuggling or alleged smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto the Company’s vessels may lead to governmental claims against the Company. The Company expects that its vessels will call in ports where smugglers may attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with or without the knowledge of crew members. To the extent the Company’s vessels are found with or accused to be carrying contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessels and whether with or without the knowledge of any of its crew, the Company may face governmental or other regulatory claims which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, such events could have ancillary consequences under INSW’s financing and other agreements. Operating costs and capital expenses will increase as the Company’s vessels age and may also increase due to unanticipated events relating to secondhand vessels and the consolidation of suppliers. In general, capital expenditures and other costs necessary for maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increase as the age of the vessel increases. As of December 31, 2023, the weighted average age of the Company’s total owned and operated fleet was 10.2 years. In addition, older vessels are typically less fuel-efficient than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Accordingly, it is likely that the operating costs of INSW’s currently operated vessels will rise as the age of the Company’s fleet increases. In addition, changes in governmental regulations and compliance with Classification Society standards may restrict the type of activities in which the vessels may engage and/or may require INSW to make additional expenditures for new equipment. Every commercial tanker must pass inspection by a Classification Society authorized by the vessel’s country of registry. The Classification Society certifies that a tanker is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the tanker and the international conventions of which that country is a member. If a Classification Society requires the Company to add equipment, INSW may be required to incur substantial costs or take its vessels out of service. Market conditions may not justify such expenditures or permit INSW to operate its older vessels profitably even if those vessels remain operational. If a vessel in INSW’s fleet does not maintain its class and/or fails any survey, it will be unemployable and unable to trade between ports until its class is restored or such failure is remedied. This would negatively impact the Company’s results of operation. In addition, the Company’s fleet includes a number of vessels purchased in the secondhand market or otherwise acquired after they have been constructed, such as through the merger. While the Company typically inspects secondhand vessels before it purchases or otherwise acquires them, those inspections do not necessarily provide INSW with the same level of knowledge about those vessels’ condition that INSW would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by it. The Company may not discover defects or other problems with such vessels before purchase, which may lead to expensive, unanticipated repairs, and could even result in accidents or other incidents for which the Company could be liable. Furthermore, recent mergers have reduced the number of available suppliers, resulting in fewer alternatives for sourcing key supplies. With respect to certain items, INSW is generally dependent upon the original equipment manufacturer for repair and replacement of the item or its spare parts. Supplier consolidation may result in a shortage of supplies and services, thereby increasing the cost of supplies or potentially inhibiting the ability of suppliers to deliver on time. These cost increases or delays could result in downtime, and delays in the repair and maintenance of the Company’s vessels and have a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. 32 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The Company’s lightering business faces significant competition and market volatility, and revenues and profitability for these operations may vary significantly from period to period. The Company provides STS transfer services, primarily in the crude oil and refined petroleum products industries. The seaborne markets for STS transfer business are highly competitive and our competitors may in some cases have greater resources than we do. The business also faces competition from alternative methods of delivering crude oil and refined petroleum products shipments to ports and vessels, including several offshore loading and offloading facilities either in operation or in various stages of planning in the USG region. Furthermore, the market for STS transfer services faces different competitive dynamics than our other tanker businesses, meaning that our expertise in the tanker markets may not apply in the same ways to our lightering business, and demand for lightering services has historically varied significantly from period to period based on customer activity in the regions in which we operate. Accordingly, our ability to maintain or grow our market share in STS transfer services may be limited, and the Company’s lightering revenues may be volatile or decline in the future. The Company is subject to credit risks with respect to its counterparties on contracts, and any failure by those counterparties to meet their obligations could cause the Company to suffer losses on such contracts, decreasing revenues and earnings. The Company has entered into, and in the future will enter into, various contracts, including charter agreements and other agreements associated with the operation of its vessels. The Company charters its vessels to other parties, who pay the Company a daily rate of hire. The Company also enters voyage charters. Historically, the Company has not experienced material problems collecting charter hire. The Company also time charters or bareboat charters some of its vessels from other parties and its continued use and operation of such vessels depends on the vessel owners’ compliance with the terms of the time charter or bareboat charter. Additionally, the Company enters into derivative contracts (related to interest rate risk) from time to time. As a result, the Company is subject to credit risks. The ability of each of the Company’s counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract will depend on a number of factors that are beyond the Company’s control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions; availability of debt or equity financing; the condition of the maritime and offshore industries; the overall financial condition of the counterparty; charter rates received for specific types of vessels; and various expenses. Charterers are sensitive to the commodity markets and may be impacted by market forces affecting commodities such as oil. In addition, in depressed market conditions, the Company’s charterers and customers may no longer need a vessel that is currently under charter or contract or may be able to obtain a comparable vessel at lower rates. As a result, the Company’s customers may fail to pay charter hire or attempt to renegotiate charter rates. If the counterparties fail to meet their obligations, the Company could suffer losses on such contracts which would decrease revenues, cash flows and earnings. The Company relies on the skills of its senior management team, and if the Company were required to replace them, it could negatively impact the effectiveness of management and the Company’s results of operations could be negatively impacted. INSW’s success depends to a significant extent upon the expertise, capabilities and efforts of its senior executives in managing the Company’s activities. INSW is led by executives with significant experience in their respective areas of responsibility, and the loss or unavailability of one or more of INSW’s senior executives for an extended period of time could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations. The Company may face unexpected drydock costs for its vessels. Vessels must be drydocked periodically. The cost of repairs and renewals required at each drydock are difficult to predict with certainty, can be substantial and the Company’s insurance does not cover these costs. In addition, vessels may have to be drydocked in the event of accidents or other unforeseen damage, and INSW’s insurance may not cover all of these costs. Vessels in drydock will not generate any income. Large drydocking expenses could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows. In addition, the time when a vessel is out of service for maintenance is determined by a number of factors including regulatory deadlines, market conditions, shipyard availability and customer requirements, and accordingly the length of time that a vessel may be off-hire may be longer than anticipated, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Technological innovation could reduce the Company’s charter income and the value of the Company’s vessels. 33 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The charter rates and the value and operational life of a vessel are determined by a number of factors including the vessel’s efficiency, operational flexibility and physical life. Efficiency includes speed, fuel economy and the ability to load and discharge cargo quickly. Flexibility includes the ability to enter harbors, utilize related docking facilities and pass through canals and straits. The length of a vessel’s physical life is related to its original design and construction, its maintenance, the impact of the stress of operations and new regulations (including in particular regulations relating to GHG emissions). If new tankers are built that are more efficient or more flexible or have longer physical lives than the Company’s vessels, competition from these more technologically advanced vessels could adversely affect the charter rates that the Company receives for its vessels and the resale value of the Company’s vessels could significantly decrease. As a result, the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The Company stores, processes, maintains, and transmits confidential information through information technology (“IT”) systems. Cybersecurity issues, such as data breaches and computer malwares, affecting INSW’s IT systems or those of its third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties, could disrupt INSW’s business, result in the unintended disclosure or misuse of confidential or proprietary information, disruption in regular business operations, damage its reputation, increase its costs, and cause losses. The Company collects, stores and transmits sensitive and business critical data, including its own proprietary business information and that of its counterparties, and personally identifiable information of counterparties and employees, using both its own IT systems and those of third-party vendors. In addition, the Company relies on the transmission of similarly sensitive data from the Company’s third-party suppliers and vendors. The safe storage, accurate processing, timely availability and secure transmission of this information is critical to INSW’s operations. The Company’s dependency on IT systems includes accounting, billing, disbursement, cargo booking and tracking, vessel scheduling and stowage, vessel operations, customer service, banking, payroll and messaging systems. The Company’s IT infrastructure, or those of its customers or third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties, are vulnerable to data breaches, computer malwares, and other security problems as well as failures caused by the occurrence of natural disasters or other unexpected problems. Many companies, including companies in the shipping industry, have increasingly reported breaches in the security of their information technology systems, some of which have involved sophisticated and targeted attacks intended to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage. The Company has experienced attempted attacks on its email system to obtain unauthorized access to confidential information. The Company may be required to spend significant capital and other resources to further protect itself and its systems against threats of security breaches and computer malware, or to alleviate problems caused by security breaches or malwares. Security breaches and malware could also expose the Company to claims, litigation and other possible liabilities. Any inability to prevent security breaches (including the inability of INSW’s third-party vendors, suppliers or counterparties to prevent security breaches) could also cause existing clients to lose confidence in the Company’s IT systems and could adversely affect INSW’s reputation, cause losses to INSW or our customers, damage our brand, and increase our costs. In order to mitigate the financial impact of any losses arising from security breaches or computer malwares, the Company has purchased insurance that covers losses arising from such breaches or malwares, including data recovery, extortion, ransomware and business interruption. INSW’s revenues are subject to seasonal variations. INSW operates its tankers in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand for tanker capacity, and therefore, charter rates. Peaks in tanker demand quite often precede seasonal oil consumption peaks, as refiners and suppliers anticipate consumer demand. Charter rates for tankers are typically higher in the fall and winter months as a result of increased oil consumption in the Northern Hemisphere. Unpredictable weather patterns and variations in oil reserves disrupt tanker scheduling. Because a majority of the Company’s vessels trade in the spot market, seasonality has affected INSW’s operating results on a quarter-to-quarter basis and could continue to do so in the future. Such seasonality may be outweighed in any period by then current economic conditions or tanker industry fundamentals. Effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. The Company maintains a system of internal controls to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires the Company to anticipate and react to changes in its business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy its reporting obligations as a public company. 34 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase the Company’s operating costs and harm its business. Furthermore, investors’ perceptions that the Company’s internal controls are inadequate or that the Company is unable to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis may harm its stock price. Work stoppages or other labor disruptions may adversely affect INSW’s operations. INSW could be adversely affected by actions taken by employees of other companies in related industries (including third parties providing services to INSW) against efforts by management to control labor costs, restrain wage or benefit increases or modify work practices or the failure of other companies in its industry to successfully negotiate collective bargaining agreements. Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters Climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions may adversely affect our operating results. An increasing concern for, and focus on climate change, has promoted extensive existing and proposed international, national and local regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Compliance with such regulations (including increased assessment, and greater reporting, of the environmental effects of our business) and our efforts to participate in reducing greenhouse gas emissions (“GHGs”) will likely increase our compliance costs, require significant capital expenditures to reduce vessel emissions and require changes to our business. Our business consists of transporting crude oil and refined petroleum products. Regulatory changes and growing public concern about the environmental impact of climate change may lead to reduced demand for crude oil and refined petroleum products and decreased demand for our services, while increasing or creating greater incentives for use of alternative energy sources. We expect regulatory and consumer efforts aimed at combating climate change to intensify and accelerate. Although we do not expect demand for oil to decline dramatically over the short-term, in the long-term climate change likely will significantly affect demand for oil and for alternatives. Any such change could adversely affect our ability to compete in a changing market and our business, financial condition and results of operations. Increasing scrutiny and changing expectations from investors, lenders and other market participants with respect to our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) policies may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks. Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, lenders and other market participants are increasingly focused on ESG practices and, in recent years, have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. The increased focus and activism related to ESG and similar matters may hinder access to capital, as investors and lenders may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices. Diminished access to capital could hinder our growth. Companies that do not adapt to or comply with investor, lender or other industry shareholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and their business, financial condition and share price may be adversely affected. We may face increasing pressures from investors, lenders and other market participants, which are increasingly focused on climate change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices, reduce our carbon footprint and promote sustainability. As a result, we may be required to implement more stringent ESG procedures or standards so that our existing and future investors remain invested in us and make further investments in us, especially given our business of transporting crude oil and refined petroleum products. In addition, we will incur additional costs and require additional resources to monitor, report and comply with wide-ranging ESG requirements. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. 35 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Compliance with complex laws, regulations, and, in particular, environmental laws or regulations, including those relating to the emission of greenhouse gases, may adversely affect INSW’s business. General The Company’s operations are affected by extensive and changing international, national and local environmental protection laws, regulations, treaties, conventions and standards in force in international waters, the jurisdictional waters of the countries in which INSW’s vessels operate, as well as the countries of its vessels’ registration. Many of these requirements are designed to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases and the risk of oil spills. They also regulate other water pollution issues, including discharge of ballast water and effluents and air emissions, including emission of greenhouse gases. These requirements impose significant capital and operating costs on INSW, including, without limitation, ones related to engine adjustments and ballast water treatment. Environmental laws and regulations also can affect the resale value or significantly reduce the useful lives of the Company’s vessels, require a reduction in carrying capacity, ship modifications or operational changes or restrictions (and related increased operating costs) or retirement of service, lead to decreased availability or higher cost of insurance coverage for environmental matters or result in the denial of access to, or detention in, certain jurisdictional waters or ports. Under local, United States and international laws, as well as international treaties and conventions, INSW could incur material liabilities, including cleanup obligations, in the event that there is a release of petroleum or other hazardous substances from its vessels or otherwise in connection with its operations. INSW could also become subject to personal injury or property damage claims relating to the release of or exposure to hazardous materials associated with its current or historic operations. Violations of or liabilities under environmental requirements also can result in substantial penalties, fines and other sanctions, including in certain instances, seizure or detention of the Company’s vessels. Oil Pollution INSW could incur significant costs, including cleanup costs, fines, penalties, third-party claims and natural resource damages, as the result of an oil spill or liabilities under environmental laws. The Company is subject to the oversight of several government agencies, including the U.S. Coast Guard and the EPA. OPA 90 affects all vessel owners shipping oil or hazardous material to, from or within the United States. OPA 90 allows for potentially unlimited liability without regard to fault for owners, operators and bareboat charterers of vessels for oil pollution in U.S. waters. Similarly, the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969, as amended, which has been adopted by most countries outside of the United States, imposes liability for oil pollution in international waters. OPA 90 expressly permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to hazardous materials and oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries. Coastal states in the United States have enacted pollution prevention liability and response laws, many providing for unlimited liability. In addition, in complying with OPA 90, IMO regulations, EU directives and other existing laws and regulations and those that may be adopted, shipowners likely will incur substantial additional capital and/or operating expenditures in meeting new regulatory requirements, in developing contingency arrangements for potential spills and in obtaining insurance coverage. Key regulatory initiatives that are anticipated to require substantial additional capital and/or operating expenditures in the next several years include more stringent limits on the sulfur content of fuel oil for vessels operating in certain areas and more stringent requirements for management and treatment of ballast water. Ballast Water Certain of the Company’s vessels are subject to more stringent numeric discharge limits of ballast water under the EPA’s VGP, with additional vessels becoming subject in future years, even though those vessels have obtained a valid extension from the USCG for implementation of treatment technology under the USCG’s final rules. The EPA has determined that it will not issue extensions under the VGP but has stated that vessels that (i) have received an extension from the USCG, (ii) are in compliance with all of the VGP requirements other than numeric discharge limits and (iii) meet certain other requirements will be entitled to “low enforcement priority”. While INSW believes that any vessel that is or may become subject to the more stringent numeric discharge limits of ballast water meets the conditions for “low enforcement priority,” no assurance can be given that they will do so. If the EPA determines to enforce the limits for such vessels, such action could have a material adverse effect on INSW. See Item 1, “Business —Environmental and Security Matters Relating to Bulk Shipping. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 36 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Due to concern over the risk of climate change, a number of countries, including the United States, and international organizations, including the EU, the IMO and the U.N., have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These regulatory measures include, among others, adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, increased efficiency standards, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. Such actions could result in significant financial and operational impacts on the Company’s business, including requiring INSW to install new emission controls, acquire allowances or pay taxes related to its greenhouse gas emissions, or administer and manage a greenhouse gas emission program. See Item 1, “Business — Environmental and Security Matters Relating to Bulk Shipping”. Other Impacts Other government regulation of vessels, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental requirements, can be expected to become stricter in the future and require the Company to incur significant capital expenditures on its vessels to keep them in compliance, or even to recycle or sell certain vessels altogether. Such expenditures could result in financial and operational impacts that may be material to INSW’s financial statements. Additionally, the failure of a shipowner or bareboat charterer to comply with local, domestic and international regulations may subject it to increased liability, may invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance coverage for the affected vessels and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports. If any of our vessels are denied access to, or are detained in, certain ports, reputation, business, financial results and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Accidents involving highly publicized oil spills and other mishaps involving vessels can be expected in the tanker industry, and such accidents or other events could be expected to result in the adoption of even stricter laws and regulations, which could limit the Company’s operations or its ability to do business and which could have a material adverse effect on INSW’s business, financial results and cash flows. In addition, the Company is required by various governmental and quasi-governmental agencies to obtain certain permits, licenses and certificates with respect to its operations. The Company believes its vessels are maintained in good condition in compliance with present regulatory requirements, are operated in compliance with applicable safety and environmental laws and regulations and are insured against usual risks for such amounts as the Company’s management deems appropriate. The vessels’ operating certificates and licenses are renewed periodically during each vessel’s required annual survey. However, government regulation of tankers, particularly in the areas of safety and environmental impact may change in the future and require the Company to incur significant capital expenditures with respect to its ships to keep them in compliance. Employment of the Company’s vessels could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment process. The shipping industry, and especially vessels that transport crude oil and refined petroleum products, is heavily regulated. In addition, the “oil majors” such as BP, Chevron Corporation, Phillips 66, ExxonMobil Corp., Royal Dutch Shell and Total S.A. have developed a strict due diligence process for selecting their shipping partners out of concerns for the environmental impact of spills. This vetting process has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive risk assessment of both the vessel manager and the vessel, including audits of the management office and physical inspections of the ship. Under the terms of the Company’s charter agreements (including those entered into by pools in which the Company participates), the Company’s charterers require that the Company’s vessels and the technical managers pass vetting inspections and management audits, respectively. The Company’s failure to maintain any of its vessels to the standards required by the oil majors could put the Company in breach of the applicable charter agreement and lead to termination of such agreement. Should the Company not be able to successfully clear the oil majors’ risk assessment processes on an ongoing basis, the future employment of the Company’s vessels could also be adversely affected. since it might lead to the oil majors’ terminating existing charters. The Company’s vessels may be directed to call on ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the U.S., the U.N., the U.K. or the EU, which could negatively affect the trading price of the Company’s common shares. From time to time, certain of the Company’s vessels, on the instructions of the charterers or pool manager responsible for the commercial management of such vessels, have called and may again call on ports located in countries or territories, and/or operated by persons, subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the U.S., the U.N., the U.K. or the EU and countries identified by the U.S., the U.N., the U.K. or the EU as state sponsors of terrorism. The U.S., U.N., the U.K. and EU sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may be amended or expanded over time. Some sanctions may also apply to transportation 37 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents of goods (including crude oil) originating in sanctioned countries (particularly Iran, Venezuela and Russia), even if the vessel does not travel to those countries, or is otherwise acting on behalf of sanctioned persons. Sanctions may include the imposition of penalties and fines against companies violating national law or companies acting outside the jurisdiction of the sanctioning power themselves becoming the target of sanctions. Although INSW believes that it is in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations and intends to maintain such compliance, and INSW does not, and does not intend to, engage in sanctionable activity, INSW might fail to comply or may inadvertently engage in a sanctionable activity in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation or sanctionable activity could result in fines or other penalties, or the imposition of sanctions against the Company, and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in the Company and negatively affect INSW’s reputation and investor perception of the value of INSW’s common stock. The Company may be subject to litigation and government inquiries or investigations that, if not resolved in the Company’s favor and not sufficiently covered by insurance, could have a material adverse effect on it. The Company has been and is, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters and subject to government inquiries and investigations. These matters may include, among other things, regulatory proceedings and litigation arising out of or relating to contract disputes, personal injury claims, environmental claims or proceedings, asbestos and other toxic tort claims, employment matters, governmental claims for taxes or duties, sanctions and other regulatory compliance, and other disputes that arise in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Although the Company intends to defend these matters vigorously, it cannot predict with certainty the outcome or effect of any such matter, and the ultimate outcome of these matters or the potential costs to resolve them could involve or result in significant expenditures or losses by the Company, or result in significant changes to INSW’s insurance costs, rules and practices in dealing with its customers, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future operating results, including profitability, cash flows, and financial condition. Insurance may not be applicable or sufficient in all cases and/or insurers may not remain solvent, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition. The Company’s recorded liabilities and estimates of reasonably possible losses for its contingent liabilities are based on its assessment of potential liability using the information available to the Company at the time and, as applicable, any past experience and trends with respect to similar matters. However, because litigation is inherently uncertain, the Company’s estimates for contingent liabilities may be insufficient to cover the actual liabilities from such claims, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. See Item 3, “Legal Proceedings” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 19, “Contingencies,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Maritime claimants could arrest INSW’s vessels, which could interrupt cash flows. Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against that vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by arresting a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of the Company’s vessels could interrupt INSW’s cash flow and require it to pay a significant amount of money to have the arrest lifted. In addition, in some jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory of liability, a claimant may arrest both the vessel that is subject to the claimant’s maritime lien and any “associated” vessel, meaning any vessel owned or controlled by the same owner. Claimants could try to assert “sister ship” liability against one vessel in the Company’s fleet for claims relating to another vessel in its fleet which, if successful, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Governments could requisition the Company’s vessels during a period of war or emergency, which may negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and available cash. A government could requisition one or more of the Company’s vessels for title or hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes the owner. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency. Government requisition of one or more of the Company’s vessels may negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and available cash. 38 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on U.S. source shipping income, which would reduce our net income and cash flows. If we do not qualify for an exemption pursuant to Section 883, or the “Section 883 exemption,” of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) then we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our shipping income that is derived from U.S. sources. If we are subject to such tax, our results of operations and cash flows would be reduced by the amount of such tax. We will qualify for the Section 883 exemption for 2024 and forward if, among other things, (i) our common shares are treated as primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States or another qualified country (“publicly traded test”), or (ii) we satisfy one of two other ownership tests. Under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, the publicly traded test will not be satisfied in any taxable year in which persons who directly, indirectly or constructively own five percent or more of our common shares (sometimes referred to as “5% shareholders”) own 50% or more of the vote and value of our common shares for more than half the days in such year, unless an exception applies. We can provide no assurance that ownership of our common shares by 5% shareholders will allow us to qualify for the Section 883 exemption in 2024 and any other future taxable years. If we do not qualify for the Section 883 exemption, our gross shipping income derived from U.S. sources, i.e., 50% of our gross shipping income attributable to transportation beginning or ending in the United States (but not both beginning and ending in the United States), generally would be subject to a four percent tax without allowance for deductions. U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. shareholders. A non-U.S. corporation generally will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company,” or a “PFIC,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes if, after applying certain look through rules, either (i) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of “passive income” or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of assets (determined on a quarterly basis) held for the production of “passive income.” We refer to assets which produce or are held for production of “passive income” as “passive assets.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” generally includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rental income and royalties other than rental income and royalties which are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business, as defined in applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations. Passive income does not include income derived from the performance of services. Although there is no authority under the PFIC rules directly on point, and existing legal authority in other contexts is inconsistent in its treatment of time charter income, we believe that the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time and spot chartering activities is services income, rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe that (i) our income from time and spot chartering activities does not constitute passive income and (ii) the assets that we own and operate in connection with the production of that income do not constitute passive assets. Therefore, we believe that we are not now and have never been a PFIC with respect to any taxable year. There is no assurance that the IRS or a court of law will accept our position and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, because there are uncertainties in the application of the PFIC rules and PFIC status is determined annually and is based on the composition of a company’s income and assets (which are subject to change), we can provide no assurance that we will not become a PFIC in any future taxable year. If we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year (and regardless of whether we remain as a PFIC for subsequent taxable years), our U.S. shareholders would be subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to distributions received from us and gain, if any, derived from the sale or other disposition of our common shares. These adverse tax consequences to shareholders could negatively impact our ability to issue additional equity in order to raise the capital necessary for our business operations. Pending and future tax law changes may result in significant additional taxes to us. Tax laws, including tax rates, in the jurisdictions in which we operate may change as a result of macroeconomic or other factors outside of our control and may result in significant additional taxes to us. For example, various governments and organizations such as the EU and Organization for Economic Co-operation Development (or the OECD) are increasingly focused on tax reform and other legislative or regulatory action to increase tax revenue. In January 2019, the OECD announced further work in continuation of its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project, focusing on two “pillars”. Pillar One provides a framework for the reallocation of certain residual profits of multinational enterprises to market jurisdictions where goods or services are used or consumed. Pillar Two consists of two interrelated rules referred to as Global Anti-Base Erosion Rules, which operate to impose a minimum tax rate of 15% calculated on a jurisdictional basis. The Pillar Two Model Rules are designed to ensure that large multinational enterprises (MNEs) that have annual revenues of €750 million or more in at least two of the four fiscal years immediately preceding the tested fiscal year pay a minimum level of tax on the income arising in each jurisdiction where they operate. In October 2021, more than 130 countries tentatively signed on to a framework that imposes a minimum tax rate of 15%, among other provisions. The framework calls for law 39 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents enactment by OECD and G20 members in 2022 to take effect in 2024 and 2025. Qualifying International Shipping Income is exempt from many aspects of this framework if the exemption requirements are satisfied. As currently drafted, the exemption requirements are limited to the extent strategic and/or commercial management of ships are carried on from within the jurisdiction in which the ship owning and revenue generating entity is domiciled. On December 20, 2021, the OECD published model rules to implement the Pillar Two rules, which are generally consistent with the agreement reached by the framework in October 2021. On December 12, 2022, the EU member states agreed to implement the OECD’s Pillar Two global corporate minimum tax rate of 15% on large multinational enterprises with revenues of at least €750 million, which generally would go into effect in 2024. These changes are presently being enacted and implemented by various countries in which we do business. These laws as enacted could result in additional tax imposed on us or our subsidiaries. In addition, national or local tax authorities may assert other claims in various circumstances. During 2023, the tax authorities in one country notified many international shipping companies, including the Company, that they may have failed to comply with extant laws applicable in such country with respect to registration, reporting possible income derived from such country, filing of appropriate tax returns, and payment of relevant taxes with respect to international shipping operations. While the law has been in place for many years, there has not been any previous enforcement and there is significant lack of clarity as to who may be subject to tax under the legislation and what income, if any, may be subject to taxation. Similarly, the status of the taxation of international shipping income in certain other countries is equally uncertain. The Company believes that any income tax liability that may arise in all such countries would not be material to the Company, but no assurance can be made as to the amount of any such liability, if any. Risks Related to the Common Stock We are incorporated in the Marshall Islands, which does not have a well-developed body of corporate case law or bankruptcy law, and, as a result, shareholders may have fewer rights and protections under Marshall Islands law than under a typical jurisdiction in the United States. Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and bylaws and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act (the "BCA"). The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been few judicial cases in the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent in existence in certain U.S. jurisdictions. Shareholder rights may differ as well. While the BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, or judicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a U.S. jurisdiction. In addition, the Marshall Islands does not have a well-developed body of bankruptcy law. As such, in the case of a bankruptcy involving us, there may be a delay of bankruptcy proceedings and the ability of securityholders and creditors to receive recovery after a bankruptcy proceeding, and any such recovery may be less predictable. It may be difficult to serve process on or enforce a United States judgment against us, our officers and our directors because we are a foreign corporation. We are a corporation formed in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. In addition, a substantial portion of our assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, you may have difficulty serving legal process within the United States upon us. You may also have difficulty enforcing, both in and outside the United States, judgments you may obtain in U.S. courts against us or our directors and officers, including in actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities laws. Furthermore, there is substantial doubt that the courts of the Republic of the Marshall Islands or of the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which our offices are located would enter judgments in original actions brought in those courts predicated on U.S. federal or state securities laws. The market price of the Company’s securities may fluctuate significantly. The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. However, the market price of the Company’s common stock may fluctuate substantially. You may not be able to resell your common stock at or above the price you paid for such securities due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. These risks include those described or referred to in this “Risk Factors” section and under “Forward -Looking Statements,” as well as, among other things: fluctuations in the Company’s operating results; activities of and results of operations of the Company’s competitors; changes in the Company’s relationships with 40 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents the Company’s customers or the Company’s vendors; changes in business or regulatory conditions; changes in the Company’s capital structure; any announcements by the Company or its competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures; additions or departures of key personnel; investors’ general perception of the Company; failure to meet market expectations; future sales of the Company’s securities by it, directors, executives and significant stockholders; changes in domestic and international economic and political conditions; and other events or factors, including those resulting from natural disasters, war, acts of terrorism or responses to these events. Any of the foregoing factors could also cause the price of the Company’s equity securities to fall and may expose the Company to securities class action litigation. Any securities class action litigation could result in substantial costs and the diversion of management’s attention and resources. In addition, the stock market has recently experienced volatility that, in some cases, has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common stock, regardless of its actual operating performance. If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about the Company’s business, the price and/or trading volume of shares of the Company’s common stock could decline. The trading market for shares of the Company’s common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about the Company and its business. If too few analysts commence and maintain coverage of the Company, the trading price for its shares might be adversely affected. Similarly, if analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about the Company’s business, the price and/or trading volume of shares of the Company’s common stock could decline. Our limited duration Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights plan dated as of April 11, 2023 (the “Amended and Restated Rights Plan”), also known as a “poison pill”, may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Company or changes in our management and, therefore, depress the market price of the Company’s common stock. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan is intended to enable all Company stockholders to realize the long-term value of their investment in the Company. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan reduces the likelihood that any person or group gains control of the Company through open market accumulation, or other tactics potentially disadvantaging the interests of all stockholders, without paying all stockholders an appropriate control premium or providing the Company’s Board of Directors sufficient time to make informed decisions in the best interests of all stockholders. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan was ratified by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 6, 2023. While the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement was effective immediately, the Rights become exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership, as defined in the Rights Agreement, of 20% or more of the Company’s common stock in a transaction not approved by the Company's Board of Directors. In that situation, each holder of a Right (other than the acquiring person or group) will have the right to purchase, upon payment of the then-current exercise price, a number of shares of Company common stock having a market value of twice the exercise price of the Right. In addition, at any time after a person or group acquires 20% or more of the Company’s common stock (unless such person or group acquires 50% or more), the Company’s Board of Directors may exchange one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding Right (other than Rights owned by such person or group, which would have become null and void). The Amended and Restated Rights Plan is not intended to interfere with any transaction that the Board of Directors determines is in the best interests of stockholders, nor does the Amended and Restated Rights Plan prevent the Board of Directors from considering any proposal. The Amended and Restated Rights Plan will expire on April 10, 2026, subject to earlier termination by the Company’s Board of Directors if the Board determines that market and other conditions warrant. Notwithstanding the foregoing advantages provided by the Amended and Restated Rights Plan to the interests of all stockholders, the Amended and Restated Rights Plan may depress the market price of the Company’s common stock by acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Company or changes in the management of the Company that the stockholders of the Company may deem advantageous. Future offerings of debt or equity securities by the Company may materially adversely affect the share price, and future capitalization measures could lead to substantial dilution of existing stockholders’ interests in the Company. The Company may seek to raise additional equity through the issuance of new shares or convertible or exchangeable bonds to finance future organic growth or acquisitions. Increasing the number of issued shares would dilute the ownership interests of existing stockholders. Stockholders’ ownership interests could also be diluted if other companies or equity interests in 41 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents companies are acquired in exchange for new shares of the Company’s common stock to be issued and if the Company’s Board of Directors makes grants of equity awards to the Company’s directors, officers and employees pursuant to any equity incentive or compensation plan, any such grants would also cause dilution. INSW may not continue to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock. During 2023, 2022 and 2021 INSW paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $308.2 million or $6.29 per share, $69.8 million or $1.42 per share and $9.4 million or $0.24 per share, respectively. The Company also paid a special cash dividend of $1.12 per share immediately prior to the Merger in July 2021. Any future determinations to pay dividends on its Common Stock will be at the discretion of its Board of Directors and will depend upon many factors, including INSW’s future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors its Board of Directors may deem relevant. The timing, declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of INSW’s Board of Directors. INSW has no obligation to, and may not be able to, declare or pay dividends on its Common Stock. If INSW does not declare and pay dividends on its Common Stock, its share price could decline. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY Cybersecurity Risk Management Program and Strategy Cybersecurity Threats In today’s digitally interconnected workspace, we are increasingly vulnerable to cybersecurity threats that can disrupt operations, and compromise sensitive information. Cybersecurity threats are continuously evolving and can vary widely, but some common types of material cyber threats include: ● Malware: Malicious software such as viruses, worms, trojans, and ransomware can infiltrate systems and disrupt operations, steal sensitive information, or extort money from the organization. ● Phishing: Phishing attacks involve tricking individuals into revealing sensitive information such as login credentials or financial data by posing as a trustworthy entity via email, phone calls, or text messages. ● Denial of Service (“DoS”) Attacks: These attacks aim to overwhelm a network, server, or website with an excessive amount of traffic, rendering it inaccessible to legitimate users. ● Insider Threats: Employees, contractors, or other trusted individuals may intentionally or unintentionally compromise security by stealing data, sharing sensitive information, or performing unauthorized actions. ● Social Engineering: Social engineering tactics involve manipulating individuals into divulging confidential information or performing actions that compromise security, often through psychological manipulation or deception. ● Supply Chain Attacks: Attackers may target third-party vendors, suppliers, or service providers to international seaways to gain unauthorized access to their systems or data. ● IoT Vulnerabilities: Internet of Things (“IoT”) devices used in maritime operations can pose security vulnerabilities if not properly secured, potentially allowing attackers to gain access to critical systems or data. ● Data Breaches: Unauthorized access to sensitive data, such as business strategy, financial records, or operational data, can lead to financial loss, legal repercussions, and damage to the organization's reputation. 42 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ● Cyber Espionage: State-sponsored or corporate espionage efforts may target to steal sensitive information, gain intelligence on operations, or disrupt critical infrastructure. We maintain a comprehensive process for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats as part of our overall risk management system and processes, including risks relating to disruption of business operations or financial reporting systems, intellectual property theft; fraud; extortion; harm to employees or customers; violation of privacy laws and other litigation and legal risk; and reputation risk. Cybersecurity is a critical component of the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management program. The Company has established an information security framework to help safeguard the confidentiality and integrity of, and access to its information assets and to ensure regulatory, contractual, and operational compliance. Our cybersecurity risk management strategy includes the following: ● ● Our program is based on the National Institute of Standard and Technology(“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework and the Center for Internet Security Critical Security Controls (“CIS”). We have adopted a “defense in depth” cybersecurity strategy and deployed multiple layers of security measures to protect the Company’s information assets and detect any potential breach quickly. Our multi-layered protection mechanisms are designed to address the security vulnerabilities inherent not only with hardware and software but also due to human error. In an extreme situation, if all the security layers fail and a breach happens, our multiple detection layers are designed to detect the breach. ◾ Human Layer: We realize that the users of the information assets are the first line of defense and cyber risk prevention is every INSW employee’s responsibility. We organize mandatory cybersecurity awareness training for all staff yearly and conduct simulation tests monthly to check employee preparedness in the detection of phishing attacks. We also maintain an IT Security Policy and Procedures document, that describes Company security policy and practices in detail. ◾ Network Security: We deploy firewalls to shield the Company’s network from malicious or untoward network traffic that violates security policies. Our firewalls are equipped with intrusion detection and intrusion prevention systems to detect and prevent potential attacks. ◾ Logical Security: Access to the Company’s information assets is governed by the IT Security Policy and Procedures document, which stipulates the procedure for granting new access, change in access, and access termination. All access changes are audited. All new system access is approved by designated data owners ensuring segregation of duties. We have a documented strong password policy for all users and all privileged access is restricted. All remote access is controlled using geofencing restrictions and requires multi-factor authentication. ◾ Operating System and Application Security: We have a vulnerability scanning tool in place that scans all information assets monthly to report any vulnerabilities. Those reports are analyzed by system administrators for appropriate mitigating actions. We have implemented an email security tool that sanitizes all incoming emails for malicious content, attachments, or links. ◾ Log Monitoring: We employ a reputable third-party managed security service provider (“MSSP”), who manages logs from all critical information assets of the Company. The MSSP’s Security Operations Center (“SOC”) assists the Company in detecting and preventing any potential cyberattack at an early stage by analyzing the log data and correlating that with the latest threat intelligence. ◾ End Point Security: We allow access to all information assets only from authorized and standard devices (endpoints). All endpoints have a next-generation anti- virus tool installed that uses a combination of artificial intelligence, behavioral detection, and machine learning algorithms to anticipate and prevent known and unknown threats. All endpoints also have an extended detection and response (“XDR”) tool installed that provides a proactive approach to threat detection and response by collecting and correlating data across multiple security layers. Alerts from all these tools are actively monitored and appropriate alerts/escalations are issued. 43 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ◾ Data Security: The core objective of our cybersecurity program is securing the Company’s sensitive data across all information assets while maintaining appropriate access for authorized personnel. To prevent any accidental data loss, we strictly follow the principle of “least privilege,” and limit users' access rights to only what is required to do their jobs. Further, all the disks are encrypted, and daily backups of all computers are maintained outside the Company’s network. ● We maintain a detailed incident response plan to identify, manage, investigate, and remediate various types of cybersecurity incidents. This plan provides organizational and operational structures, processes, and procedures to allow responsible personnel to initiate and execute a proper response to cybersecurity incidents that may affect the function and security of IT assets, information resources, and business operations. The plan describes the processes for cybersecurity incident severity assessment, materiality determination, roles and responsibilities for the incident response team members, and necessary alerts and notifications. The plan is regularly updated, reviewed by management, and tested yearly involving relevant stakeholders so that all are familiar with their roles and responsibilities in case of a cyber incident. We routinely review the effectiveness of our cybersecurity program using the applicable CIS Critical Security Controls and take necessary actions. We employ external independent experts to review and test the effectiveness of our cybersecurity processes, and protection and detection mechanisms. The findings are reviewed by management and approved changes are prioritized and implemented. We have a retainer agreement with a reputable cyber incident response team, who assists the Company in reviewing the cyber incident response plan and conducting yearly tabletop drills. The experts on the cyber incident response team are available on a priority basis to assist the Company with forensics and other sophisticated analyses and investigations in case of a cyber incident for quick response and efficient recovery. We have insurance coverage for losses and expenses related to liability, privacy and regulatory actions, incident response, business interruption, data recovery, hardware replacement, extortion, and reputational harm arising from potential cybersecurity incidents. Cybersecurity Incidents Our business strategy, results of operations and financial condition have not been materially affected by risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of previous cybersecurity incidents, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not be materially affected in the future by such risks and any future material incidents. In the last three fiscal years, we have not experienced any material information security breach incidences and the expenses we have incurred from information security breach incidences were immaterial. This includes penalties and settlements, of which there were none. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on our cybersecurity-related risks. Cybersecurity Governance Management Our cybersecurity risk management program is managed by the Chief Information Security Officer (the “CISO”) and overseen by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer. Our CISO has over 25 years of experience in maritime IT. He holds an MBA and a Master of Science degree in Information Management and is a Certified Information Security Manager from the Information Systems Audit and Control Association, certified in Cybersecurity Risk Management by Harvard University, Cybersecurity Oversight by Carnegie Mellon, and Maritime Cybersecurity by Lloyds Maritime. The CISO and other members of the IT security team actively participate in maritime-specific as well as other broader cybersecurity groups for collaboration on cyber resilience, threat intelligence sharing, and best practices exchange. All the members of the IT security team regularly undergo new training/certifications on cybersecurity and attend seminars/conferences related to cybersecurity 44 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents to keep their knowledge and expertise current. The CISO meets with the Chief Executive Officer of the Company monthly, and more frequently if warranted, to provide updates on cybersecurity programs, threats, and incidents. Board of Directors The Corporate Governance and Risk Assessment Committee (the “Governance Committee”) of the Board of Directors is primarily responsible for the oversight of risks from cybersecurity threats. To fulfill this responsibility, the Governance Committee receives regular updates, at least quarterly about the Company’s cybersecurity risks and mitigation program from management, specifically the CISO. The Chairman of the Governance Committee provides quarterly reports of such updates to the full Board of Directors. The CISO’s quarterly report to the Governance Committee contains updates to the cybersecurity risk register, summaries of any material cybersecurity threats or incidents and responses thereto, updates on cybersecurity trends and the results of any assessments performed. The quarterly reports also include changes to cybersecurity processes, products and third- party service providers, third-party cybersecurity risk reviews, and regulatory changes. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES We lease approximately 13,100 square feet of office space for the Company’s New York headquarters. We do not own or lease any production facilities, plants, mines or similar real properties. At December 31, 2023, the Company owned or operated an aggregate of 73 vessels, which included 14 chartered-in vessels. See tables presented under Item 1, “Business—Fleet Operations.” ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS See Note 19, “Contingencies” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for information regarding legal proceedings in which we are involved. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 45 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Market Information, Holders and Dividends The Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbol INSW. The range of high and low closing sales prices of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NYSE for each of the quarters during the last two years are set forth below: (In dollars) 2023 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 2022 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Common stock (INSW) High Low $ 52.88 $ 42.47 $ 46.72 $ 49.67 $ 18.61 $ 24.90 $ 36.00 $ 46.23 $ 33.29 $ 35.30 $ 35.91 $ 40.97 $ 13.74 $ 18.72 $ 18.22 $ 33.12 As of February 23, 2024, there were 59 stockholders of record of the Company’s common stock. During 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors declared and paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $308.2 million or $6.29 per share as follows: Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date February 27, 2023 May 4, 2023 August 8, 2023 November 6, 2023 March 14, 2023 June 14, 2023 September 13, 2023 December 13, 2023 March 28, 2023 $ June 28, 2023 $ September 27, 2023 $ December 27, 2023 $ Regular Quarterly Dividend per Share 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Supplemental Dividend per Share 1.88 1.50 1.30 1.13 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Dividends Paid (Dollars in Millions) 98.3 79.3 69.4 61.2 On February 28, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of common stock and a supplemental dividend of $1.20 per share of common stock, both payable on March 28, 2024 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2024. The declaration and timing of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our future operations and earnings, capital requirements, general financial condition, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law or the SEC and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. 46 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Purchase and Sale of Equity Securities The following is a summary of the purchases made under the Company’s stock repurchase program during the three years ended December 31, 2023: Year-ended December 31, 2023 2022 2021 Total shares repurchased 366,483 687,740 1,077,070 $ $ $ Average Price per share 38.03 29.08 15.44 $ $ $ Total Cost (Dollars in Millions) 13.9 20.0 16.7 On August 4, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the renewal of the Company’s $30.0 million stock repurchase program for another 24-month period ending August 4, 2022. Subsequently, on October 28, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program from $30.0 million to $50.0 million. Under the program, the Company could opportunistically repurchase up to $50.0 million worth of shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time over a 24-month period, on the open market or otherwise, in such quantities, at such prices, in such manner and on such terms and conditions as management determined was in the best interests of the Company. Shares owned by employees, directors and other affiliates of the Company were not eligible for repurchase under this program without further authorization from the Board. In August 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program to $60.0 million from $33.3 million and extended the expiration of the program to December 31, 2023. In August 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program to $50.0 million from $26.1 million. In November 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the extension of the expiry date of the stock repurchase program from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2023, the remaining buyback authorization under the Company’s stock repurchase program was $50.0 million. Future buybacks under the stock repurchase program will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and subject to limitations under the Company’s debt facilities. See Note 13, “Capital Stock and Stock Compensation,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for a description of shares withheld to cover tax withholding liabilities relating to the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units held by certain members of management, which is incorporated by reference in this Item 5. On December 20, 2023, the Company adopted an “at the market” offering program in connection with general corporate housekeeping and entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Evercore Group L.L.C. and Jefferies LLC, as our sales agents, relating to the common shares of International Seaways, Inc. In accordance with the terms of the Distribution Agreement, we may offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $100.0 million from time to time through the sales agents. Sales of shares of our common stock, if any, may be made in privately negotiated transactions, which may include block trades, or transactions that are deemed to be "at the market" offerings as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including sales made directly on the NYSE or sales made to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or as otherwise agreed upon by the sales agents and us. We also may sell some or all of the shares in this offering to a sales agent as principal for its own account at a price per share agreed upon at the time of sale. We will designate the minimum price per share at which the common shares may be sold and the maximum amount of common shares to be sold through the sales agents during any selling period or otherwise determine such maximum amount together with the sales agents. Each sales agent will receive from us a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross sales price of all common shares sold through it as sales agent under the Distribution Agreement. In connection with the sale of common stock, each of the sales agents may be deemed an "underwriter" within the meaning of the Securities Act, and the compensation paid to the sales agents may be deemed to be underwriting commission. The sales agents are not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of our common shares but will use their commercially reasonable efforts, as our agents and subject to the terms of the Distribution Agreement, to sell the common shares offered, as requested by us. We intend to use the net proceeds of any offering, after deducting the sales agents’ commissions and our offering expenses, for general corporate purposes. This may include, among other things, additions to working capital, repayment or refinancing of existing indebtedness or other corporate obligations, financing of capital expenditures (including the purchase of marine exhaust gas cleaning 47 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents systems that reduce sulfur emissions to comply with upcoming implementation of new IMO standards) and acquisitions and investment in existing and future projects. As of the date hereof, the Company has neither sold or undertaken to sell any shares pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. The Company has no obligation to sell any shares and may at any time suspend offers under the Distribution Agreement or terminate the Distribution Agreement. Completion of Merger Transaction On July 16, 2021 (the “Effective Time”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated as of March 30, 2021, by and among INSW, Diamond S Shipping Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation (“Diamond S”), and Dispatch Transaction Sub, Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of INSW (“Merger Sub”), Merger Sub merged with and into Diamond S (the “Merger”), with Diamond S surviving such merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of INSW. Immediately following the Effective Time, the Company contributed all of the outstanding stock of Diamond S to International Seaways Operating Corporation, a direct wholly- owned subsidiary of the Company. At the Effective Time, each common share of Diamond S (the “Diamond S Common Shares”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding Diamond S Common Shares owned by Diamond S, the Company, Merger Sub or any of their respective direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries) was cancelled in exchange for the right to receive 0.55375 of a share of common stock of the Company (the “INSW Common Stock”) and cash payable in respect of fractional shares. The aforementioned 0.55375 exchange ratio set forth in the Merger Agreement resulted in the issuance of 22,536,647 shares of INSW Common Stock, with the pre-Merger INSW shareholders and the former Diamond S shareholders owning approximately 55.75% and 44.25%, respectively, of the 50,674,393 issued and outstanding common stock of the Company immediately following the Effective Time. As provided for under the terms of the Merger Agreement, on July 15, 2021, prior to the Effective Time, INSW paid a special dividend to its shareholders of record as of July 14, 2021 in an aggregate amount equal to $31.5 million ($1.12 per share). Stockholder Return Performance Presentation Set forth below is a line graph for the period between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023 comparing the percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock against the cumulative return of (i) the published Standard and Poor’s 500 index and (ii) a peer group index consisting of Frontline Ltd. (FRO), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TNP), Teekay Tankers Ltd. Class A (TNK), DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT), Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC), Scorpio Tankers, Inc. (STNG), Euronav NV (EURN), and the Company, referred to as the peer group index. 48 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* THE COMPANY, S&P 500 INDEX, PEER GROUP INDEX Graphic *Assumes that the value of the investment in the Company’s common stock and each index was $100 on January 1, 2019 and that all dividends were reinvested. Equity Compensation Plan Information See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” for further information on the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the 2020 Management Incentive Compensation Plan and the 2020 Non-Employee Director Incentive Compensation Plan. 49 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS INTRODUCTION This MD&A, which should be read in conjunction with our accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” provides a discussion and analysis of our business, current developments, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. It is organized as follows: ● General. This section provides a general description of our business, which we believe is important in understanding the results of our operations, financial condition and potential future trends. ● Operations & Oil Tanker Markets. This section provides an overview of industry operations and dynamics that have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. ● Results from Vessel Operations. This section provides an analysis of our results of operations presented on a business segment basis. In addition, a brief description of significant transactions and other items that affect the comparability of the results is provided, if applicable. ● Liquidity and Sources of Capital. This section provides an analysis of our cash flows, outstanding debt and commitments. Included in the analysis of our outstanding debt is a discussion of the amount of financial capacity available to fund our ongoing operations and future commitments as well as a discussion of the Company’s planned and/or already executed capital allocation activities. ● Risk Management. This section provides a general overview of how the interest rate, currency and fuel price volatility risks are managed by the Company. ● Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies. This section identifies those accounting policies that are considered important to our results of operations and financial condition, require significant judgment and involve significant management estimates. A detailed discussion of the 2022 to 2021 year-over-year changes is not included herein and can be found in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed on February 28, 2023. GENERAL We are a provider of ocean transportation services for crude oil and refined petroleum products. We operate our vessels in the International Flag market. Our business includes two reportable segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 we derived 51% and 62%, respectively, of our TCE revenues from our Product Carriers segment. Revenues from our Crude Tankers segment constituted the balance of our TCE revenues during these periods. As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s operating fleet consisted of 73 wholly-owned or lease financed and time chartered-in vessels aggregating 8.8 million deadweight tons (“dwt”). In addition to our operating fleet of 73 vessels, four LR1 newbuilds are scheduled for delivery to the Company between the second half of 2025 and first quarter of 2026, bringing the total operating and newbuild fleet to 77 vessels. Our fleet includes VLCC, Suezmax and Aframax crude tankers and LR2, LR1 and MR product carriers. The Company’s revenues are highly sensitive to patterns of supply and demand for vessels of the size and design configurations owned and operated by the Company and the trades in which those vessels operate. Rates for the transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum products from which the Company earns a substantial majority of its revenues are determined by market forces such as the supply and demand for oil, the distance that cargoes must be transported, and the number of vessels expected to be available at the time such cargoes need to be transported. The demand for oil shipments is significantly affected by the state of the global economy, levels of U.S. domestic and international production and OPEC exports. The number of vessels is affected by newbuilding deliveries and by the removal of existing vessels from service, principally through storage, recycling or conversions. The Company’s revenues are also affected by its vessel employment strategy, which seeks to achieve the optimal mix of spot (voyage charter) and long-term (time or bareboat charter) charters. Because shipping revenues and voyage expenses are significantly affected by the mix 50 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents between voyage charters and time charters, the Company measures the performance of its fleet of vessels based on TCE revenues. Management makes economic decisions based on anticipated TCE rates and evaluates financial performance based on TCE rates achieved. In order to take advantage of market conditions and optimize economic performance, management employs all of the Company’s LR1 product carriers, which currently participate in the Panamax International pool, in the transportation of crude oil cargoes. Our revenues are derived predominantly from spot market voyage charters and our vessels are predominantly employed in the spot market via market-leading commercial pools. We derived approximately 91% and 96% of our total TCE revenues in the spot market for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The future minimum revenues, before reduction for brokerage commissions, expected to be received on non-cancelable time charters for three VLCCs, two Suezmaxes, one Aframax, and six MRs as of December 31, 2023 are as follows: (Dollars in millions) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Thereafter Future minimum revenues 115.1 82.4 47.9 33.9 34.0 41.0 354.3 (1) Future minimum contracted revenues do not include the Company’s share of time charters entered into by the pools in which it participates or profit-sharing above the base rate on the newbuild dual-fuel LNG VLCCs. In arriving at the minimum future charter revenues, an estimated time off-hire to perform periodic maintenance on each vessel has been deducted, although there is no assurance that such estimate will be reflective of the actual off-hire in the future. $ $ Amount(1) Graphic Russian-Ukraine Conflict The ongoing military conflict in Ukraine has had a significant direct and indirect impact on the trade of crude oil and refined petroleum products. This conflict has resulted in the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union, among other countries, implementing sanctions and executive orders against citizens, entities, and activities connected to Russia. Some of these sanctions and executive orders target the Russian oil sector, including a prohibition on the import of oil from Russia to the United States or the 51 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents United Kingdom, and the European Union's ban on Russian crude oil and petroleum products which took effect in December 2022 and February 2023, respectively. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine also led to a disruption in supply chains for crude oil and refined petroleum products, changing volumes and trade routes, thus increasing ton-mile demand for the seaborne transportation of both crude oil and refined petroleum products, which resulted in a prolonged spike in freight rates. Self-sanctioning by Western oil majors and many ship owners resulted in disrupted product flows, primarily diesel, from Russia to Europe, while high arbitrage spreads incentivized Middle Eastern and U.S. diesel flows to Europe, increasing ton-mile demand for vessels. The U.S., EU nations and other countries could impose wider sanctions and take other actions. Further sanctions imposed or actions taken by the U.S., EU nations or other countries, and retaliatory measures by Russia in response, could lead to increased volatility in global oil demand, which could have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, it is possible that third parties with which we do business may be impacted by events in Russia and Ukraine, which could adversely affect us. See Item 1A, Risk Factors – Terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability can affect the tanker industry, which could adversely affect INSW’s business. Red Sea Attacks The ongoing military conflict between Israel and Hamas has had a direct and indirect impact on the trade of crude oil and refined petroleum products. Heightened security risks because of attacks on merchant vessels transiting through the Red Sea to or from the Suez Canal has led to an increase in ton-mile demand for vessels as more vessel owners are opting to re-route their vessels around the Cape of Good Hope. See Item 1A, Risk Factors – Terrorist attacks and international hostilities and instability can affect the tanker industry, which could adversely affect INSW’s business. OPERATIONS AND OIL TANKER MARKETS The International Energy Agency (“IEA”) estimates global oil consumption for the fourth quarter of 2023 at 102.0 million barrels per day (“b/d”), up 1.8% from the same quarter in 2022. The estimate for global oil consumption for 2024 is 103.0 million b/d, an increase of 1.3% over the 2023 estimate of 101.7 million b/d. OECD demand in 2024 is estimated to decrease by 0.2% to 45.6 million b/d, while non-OECD demand is estimated to increase by 2.5% to 57.4 million b/d. Global oil production in the fourth quarter of 2023 was 102.2 million b/d, the same level as the fourth quarter of 2022. OPEC crude oil production averaged 26.7 million b/d in the fourth quarter of 2023, a decrease of 0.3 million b/d from the third quarter of 2023, and a decrease of 2.4 million b/d from the fourth quarter of 2022. Non-OPEC production increased by 2.3 million b/d to 70.0 million b/d in the fourth quarter of 2023 compared with the fourth quarter of 2022. Oil production in the U.S. in the fourth quarter of 2023 increased by 2.5% to 13.3 million b/d compared to the third quarter of 2023 and by 7.0% from the fourth quarter of 2022. U.S. refinery throughput decreased by 1.3 million b/d to 15.8 million b/d in the fourth quarter of 2023 compared with the third quarter of 2023. U.S. crude oil imports in the fourth quarter of 2023 decreased by 0.1 million b/d to 6.1 million b/d compared with the fourth quarter of 2022, with imports from OPEC countries remaining flat and imports from non- OPEC countries decreasing by 0.1 million b/d. China’s crude oil imports in 2023 set a new record of 11.3 million b/d; the previous record year was 2020 with 10.8 million b/d. Crude imports in December averaged 11.4 million b/d, up from November’s imports of 10.3 million b/d. Total commercial inventories ended the fourth quarter of 2023 essentially flat compared with the fourth quarter of 2022; however stocks during the fourth quarter of 2023 declined by approximately 64.0 million barrels from the end of the prior quarter while stocks during the fourth quarter of 2022 increased by approximately 21.0 million barrels. During the fourth quarter of 2023, the tanker fleet of vessels over 10,000 dwt increased, net of vessels recycled, by 1.2 million dwt as the crude fleet increased by 0.8million dwt, with VLCCs and Aframaxes growing by 0.6 million dwt and 0.4 million dwt, respectively, and Suezmaxes decreasing by 0.2 million dwt. The product carrier fleet increased by 0.4 million dwt, with MRs growing 0.4 million dwt. Year-over-year, the size of the tanker fleet increased by 13.1 million dwt with the VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, and MRs 52 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents increasing by 6.1 million dwt, 0.9 million dwt, 4.0 million dwt, and 2.2 million dwt, respectively. The LR1/Panamax fleet remained unchanged. The tanker orderbook remains at historic lows across all tanker sectors and the average age of the global fleet is approximately 13 years. During the fourth quarter of 2023, the tanker orderbook increased by 3.4 million dwt overall compared with the third quarter of 2023. The crude tanker orderbook increased by 2.6 million dwt. The VLCC orderbook remained flat, while the Suezmax and Aframax orderbooks increased by 1.4 million dwt and 1.2 million dwt respectively. The product carrier orderbook increased by 0.8 million dwt, with increases in the LR1 and MR sectors of 0.6 million dwt and 0.2 million dwt respectively. Year-over-year, the total tanker orderbook increased by 17.8 million dwt, with VLCC decreasing by 1.1 million dwt and increases in Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, Panamaxes and LR1s of 7.2 million dwt, 5.7 million dwt, 2.2 million dwt and 3.7 million dwt, respectively. Crude tanker rates recovered during the fourth quarter of 2023 from the relatively lower rates in the third quarter of 2023, remaining significantly over 10-year average rates and cash breakeven levels, reflecting the continuing impact of the disruptions in trade flows on tanker demand. Clean product tanker rates remained strong during the quarter. The strength in rates across the board continued into the first quarter of 2024. RESULTS FROM VESSEL OPERATIONS During 2023, income from vessel operations increased by $172.8 million to $615.4 million from $442.7 million in 2022. Such increase resulted principally from a year-over-year increase in TCE revenues and larger gains on the sale of vessels recognized in the current year, partially offset by increased depreciation and amortization, vessel expenses, and charter hire expenses in the current year. The increase in TCE revenues in 2023 of $201.8 million, or 24%, to $1,055.5 million from $853.7 million in 2022 primarily reflects (i) a net aggregate $191.9 million rates-based increase resulting from higher average daily rates earned across all of INSW’s fleet sectors, with the exception of the MRs, and (ii) a $10.5 million increase attributable to the Company’s Lightering business. The following tables provide a quarterly trend analysis of spot TCE rates earned between the fourth quarter of 2022 and 2023 by our Crude Tankers and Product Carriers fleet. See the “Operations and Oil Tanker Markets” discussion above for a description of the market factors that impacted the quarterly trend of spot rates during 2023. December 31, 2022 March 31, 2023 Spot Earnings for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2023 September 30, 2023 December 31, 2023 $ $ $ 64,596 799 59,064 1,029 62,030 284 $ $ $ 46,371 780 58,191 996 50,756 330 $ $ $ 52,307 781 61,267 988 53,482 364 $ $ $ 40,961 870 38,708 1,012 34,046 232 $ $ $ 42,991 837 47,318 1,006 43,952 256 Crude Tankers VLCC: Average rate Revenue days Suezmax: Average rate Revenue days Aframax: Average rate Revenue days 53 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Product Carriers LR2 Average rate Revenue days LR1 Average rate Revenue days MR Average rate Revenue days December 31, 2022 March 31, 2023 Spot Earnings for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2023 September 30, 2023 December 31, 2023 $ $ $ — $ — 63,950 818 39,678 3,350 $ $ — $ — 70,838 800 31,468 3,087 $ $ 25,594 41 63,608 780 28,331 2,954 $ $ $ 32,603 92 56,295 685 26,563 2,836 $ $ $ 43,666 92 46,199 561 31,493 2,738 See Note 5, “Business and Segment Reporting,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information on the Company’s segments, including equity in income of affiliated companies and reconciliations of (i) time charter equivalent revenues to shipping revenues and (ii) adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations for the segments to income/(loss) before income taxes, as reported in the consolidated statements of operations. Crude Tankers (Dollars in thousands, except daily rate amounts) TCE revenues Vessel expenses Charter hire expenses Depreciation and amortization Adjusted income from vessel operations (a) Average daily TCE rate Average number of owned vessels (b) Average number of vessels chartered-in under leases Number of revenue days (c) Number of ship-operating days (d) Owned vessels Vessels bareboat chartered-in under leases (e) Vessels spot chartered-in under leases (f) 2023 2022 $ $ $ $ $ $ 512,220 (115,710) (11,870) (76,877) 307,764 49,619 20.0 9.2 10,323 7,300 3,337 19 321,857 (98,844) (15,380) (62,596) 145,037 34,724 18.5 9.0 9,269 6,770 3,285 14 (a) Adjusted income from vessel operations by segment is before general and administrative expenses, third-party debt modification fees and gain on disposal of vessels and other property, net of impairments. (b) The average is calculated to reflect the addition and disposal of vessels during the period. (c) Revenue days represent ship-operating days less days that vessels were not available for employment due to repairs, drydock or lay-up. Revenue days are weighted to reflect the Company’s interest in chartered-in vessels. (d) Ship-operating days represent calendar days. (e) Represents VLCCs and Aframaxes that secured lease financing arrangements during the periods presented. (f) The Company’s Crude Tankers Lightering business spot chartered-in vessels under operating leases during 2023 and 2022 for full service lightering jobs. The following table provides a breakdown of TCE rates achieved for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 between spot and fixed earnings and the related revenue days. The information is based, in part, on information provided by the commercial pools in which the segment’s vessels participate and excludes commercial pool fees/commissions averaging approximately $973 and $787 per 54 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents day in 2023 and 2022, respectively, as well as activity in the Crude Tankers Lightering business and revenue and revenue days for which recoveries were recorded by the Company under its loss of hire insurance policies. VLCC: Average rate Revenue days Suezmax: Average rate Revenue days Aframax (1): Average rate Revenue days Panamax(2): Average rate Revenue days Spot Earnings Fixed Earnings Spot Earnings Fixed Earnings 2023 2022 $ $ $ $ 45,483 3,269 51,293 4,002 46,841 1,182 $ $ $ — $ — 40,098 979 31,065 680 38,566 164 $ $ $ — $ — 29,361 3,220 32,579 3,901 36,488 1,283 19,851 70 $ $ $ $ 44,043 310 28,287 365 — — — — (1) During the first quarter of 2023, one of the Company’s Aframaxes was employed on a transitional voyage in the spot market outside of its ordinary course operations in a commercial pool. Such transitional voyage is excluded from the table above. (2) The 2022 spot earnings primarily relate to the results of a positioning voyage of one of the Company’s 2004-built Panamaxes in the Panamax International Pool during the first quarter of 2022, prior to its sale for recycling in April 2022. During 2023, TCE revenues for the Crude Tankers segment increased by $190.4 million, or 59%, to $512.2 million from $321.9 million in 2022. Such increase principally resulted from (i) an aggregate rates-based increase in the Suezmax, VLCC and Aframax fleets of $146.1 million due to significantly higher average daily blended rates in these sectors, (ii) a $21.5 million days-based increase in the VLCC fleet, which primarily reflected the delivery of three dual-fuel LNG VLCC newbuilds between March 2023 and May 2023, (iii) an aggregate $14.6 million days-based increase in the Suezmax and Aframax fleets, which reflected 462 fewer primarily drydock related off-hire days in 2023 and (iv) a $10.5 million increase in the Crude Tankers Lightering business. These increases were partially offset by (v) a $2.2 million days-based decrease in the Panamax fleet due to the Company’s recycling of its two remaining Panamaxes in April 2022. Vessel expenses increased by $16.9 million to $115.7 million in 2023 from $98.8 million in 2022. Such increase was principally driven by the VLCC newbuild deliveries described above, along with increased costs of spares, stores and lubricating oils. Charter hire expenses decreased by $3.5 million to $11.9 million in 2023 from $15.4 million in 2022. Approximately $5.8 million of the decrease reflects the impact of the exercise of purchase options under bareboat charters for two of the Company’s Aframaxes in 2023, partially offset by a $2.3 million increase in charter hire expense in the Crude Tankers Lightering business. Depreciation and amortization increased by $14.3 million to $76.9 million in 2023 from $62.6 million in 2022 principally as a result of (i) $7.6 million relating to the commencement of depreciation on the Company’s three dual-fuel LNG VLCC newbuilds, (ii) the impact of drydockings and ballast water treatment system and scrubber installations during 2022 and 2023, and (iii) $2.7 million of incremental depreciation relating to the two previously bareboat chartered-in Aframaxes purchased by the Company as noted above. Excluding depreciation and amortization and general and administrative expenses, operating income for the Crude Tankers Lightering business was $23.3 million for 2023 compared to $16.7 million for 2022. Although lightering activity levels decreased year-over-year, with 438 service support only lighterings and two full-service lighterings being performed during 2023 compared to the 472 service support only lighterings and one full-service lightering that were performed during 2022, operating income increased year-over-year due to the higher average rates earned per lightering operation in 2023 compared with the average rates earned in 2022. 55 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Product Carriers (Dollars in thousands, except daily rate amounts) TCE revenues Vessel expenses Charter hire expenses Depreciation and amortization Adjusted income from vessel operations Average daily TCE rate Average number of owned vessels Average number of vessels chartered-in under leases Number of revenue days Number of ship-operating days Owned vessels Vessels bareboat chartered-in under leases (a) Vessels time chartered-in under leases $ $ $ 2023 2022 $ $ $ 543,299 (143,831) (27,533) (52,160) 319,775 33,518 39.4 6.9 16,209 14,384 1,644 876 531,853 (141,830) (16,752) (47,706) 325,565 30,221 43.7 6.9 17,599 15,951 1,467 1,035 (a) Represents an LR2 and MRs that secured lease financing arrangements during the periods presented. The following table provides a breakdown of TCE rates achieved for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 between spot and fixed earnings and the related revenue days. The information is based, in part, on information provided by the commercial pools in which the segment’s vessels participate and excludes commercial pool fees/commissions averaging approximately $797 and $665 per day in 2023 and 2022, respectively, as well as revenue and revenue days for which recoveries were recorded by the Company under its loss of hire insurance policies. LR2 (1): Average rate Revenue days LR1 (2): Average rate Revenue days MR (3): Average rate Revenue days Handy: Average rate Revenue days Spot Earnings Fixed Earnings Spot Earnings Fixed Earnings 2023 2022 $ $ $ $ 35,842 225 60,428 2,826 29,479 11,615 $ $ $ — $ — 18,588 140 $ — $ — 21,040 1,210 $ — $ — — $ — 38,706 3,113 30,345 13,262 13,861 469 $ $ $ 17,613 362 — — 20,927 140 — — (1) During 2023, the Company’s LR2 was employed on a transitional voyage in the spot market subsequent to the May 2023 expiry of its time charter and prior to joining the (2) Hafnia LR2 Pool in July 2023. In order to take advantage of market conditions and optimize economic performance, management employs all of the Company’s LR1 product carriers, which operate in the Panamax International pool, exclusively in the transportation of crude oil cargoes. During 2023, two LR1s were employed on transitional voyages in the spot market outside of their ordinary course operations in the Panamax International pool. Such transitional voyages are excluded from the table above. (3) During portions of 2023 and 2022, certain of the Company’s MRs were employed on transitional voyages in the spot market outside of their ordinary course operations in commercial pools. Such transitional voyages are excluded from the table above. During 2023, TCE revenues for the Product Carriers segment increased by $11.4 million, or 2%, to $543.3 million from $531.9 million in 2022. The increase in TCE revenues was primarily as a result of (i) a $64.2 million aggregate rates-based increase in the LR1 and LR2 sectors due to substantial year-over-year increases in average daily blended rates earned in the current year. Offsetting such increase to a large extent were (ii) a $29.4 million aggregate days-based decrease in the MR and Handysize sectors, principally 56 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents due to the sales of five MRs between May 2022 and December 2023, and the final four remaining Handysize vessels in the Company’s fleet during the second quarter of 2022, (iii) an $18.4 million rates-based decline in the MR sector due to lower daily rates earned in the current year, and (iv) a $5.2 million days-based decrease in the LR1 fleet sector which reflects a 121-day net decrease in time chartered-in days and 73 more off-hire days in the current year, partially offset by the purchase of a 2011-built LR1 in February 2022. Vessel expenses during 2023 increased by $2.0 million to $143.8 million from $141.8 million in 2022. The increase reflects an increase in costs for spares and stores, partially offset by the MR and Handysize sales referenced above. Charter hire expenses increased by $10.8 million to $27.5 million in 2023 from $16.8 million in 2022 primarily as a result of (i) increased daily rates for two time chartered-in LR1s upon the Company’s extension of such time charters in October 2022 and May 2023, respectively, and (ii) the Company time chartering-in an additional LR1 in July 2023 at a current market rate to replace LR1s that were redelivered to their owners upon expiry of their time charters. The impact of the increase in rates was partially offset by the year-over-year decrease in time chartered-in days referenced above. Depreciation and amortization increased by $4.5 million to $52.2 million in the current year from $47.7 million in the prior year. Such increase resulted from increased drydock amortization, and the purchase of the LR1 described above, partially offset by the MR and Handysize sales described above. General and Administrative Expenses During 2023, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.1 million to $47.5 million from $46.4 million in 2022. The primary driver for the increase was increased compensation and benefits costs of $2.9 million, of which $1.8 million relates to non-cash stock compensation. Partially offsetting such increase was a $2.2 million decrease in costs relating to shareholder activism-related matters in the current year. Equity in Income of Affiliated Companies The Company sold its interest in the FSO joint ventures on June 7, 2022. During 2022, equity in income of affiliated companies was $0.7 million, which reflected the Company’s recognition of a loss on the sale of $9.5 million. Other Income/(Expense) Other income was $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared with $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The current period other income includes $13.9 million of interest income resulting from a significant increase in the average balance of invested cash and the interest rates earned on such investments during 2023 compared to interest income of only $3.7 million earned during 2022. Such interest income in 2023 was partially offset by a $1.3 million loss on extinguishment of debt and a $2.7 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs. Similar unamortized deferred financing costs write-offs during 2022 amounted to $1.3 million. See Note 10, “Debt,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information. The 2023 and 2022 periods also reflect net actuarial gains and currency gains or losses associated with the Company’s retirement benefit obligation in the United Kingdom. Interest Expense The components of interest expense are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Interest before items shown below Interest cost on defined benefit pension obligation Impact of interest rate hedge derivatives Capitalized interest Interest expense 2023 2022 $ $ 77,912 982 (10,750) (2,385) 65,759 $ $ 62,847 497 (1,259) (4,364) 57,721 Interest expense increased in 2023 compared to 2022 as a result of (i) higher average floating interest rates during 2023, (ii) the impact of two lease financings entered into during the second quarter of 2022, and (iii) the post-delivery interest expense related to BoComm Lease Financing. See Note 10, “Debt,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further information on the Company’s debt facilities. 57 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Income Tax Provision We qualified for an exemption pursuant to Section 883, or the “Section 883 exemption,” of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” for the tax year ended December 31, 2023. We will qualify for the Section 883 exemption for 2024 and forward if, among other things, (i) our common shares are treated as primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States or another qualified country (“publicly traded test”), or (ii) we satisfy one of two other ownership tests. Under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, the publicly traded test will not be satisfied in any taxable year in which persons who directly, indirectly or constructively own five percent or more of our common shares (sometimes referred to as “5% shareholders”) own 50% or more of the vote and value of our common shares for more than half the days in such year, unless an exception applies. We can provide no assurance that ownership of our common shares by 5% shareholders will allow us to qualify for the Section 883 exemption in future taxable years. If we do not qualify for the Section 883 exemption, our gross shipping income derived from U.S. sources, i.e., 50% of our gross shipping income attributable to transportation beginning or ending in the United States (but not both beginning and ending in the United States), generally would be subject to a U.S. federal income tax of four percent without allowance for deductions. The Company reviews its freight tax obligations on a regular basis and may update its assessment of its tax positions based on available information at that time. Such information may include additional legal advice as to the applicability of freight taxes in relevant jurisdictions. Freight tax regulations are subject to change and interpretation; therefore, the amounts recorded by the Company may change accordingly. During 2023 and 2022, the Company increased its reserve for uncertain tax liabilities for various jurisdictions by $3.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. See Note 12, “Taxes,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for further details on the income tax provision line. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA EBITDA represents net income/(loss) before interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. Adjusted EBITDA consists of EBITDA adjusted for the impact of certain items that we do not consider indicative of our ongoing operating performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented to provide investors with meaningful additional information that management uses to monitor ongoing operating results and evaluate trends over comparative periods. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered a substitute for, net income or cash flows from operations determined in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results reported under GAAP. Some of the limitations are: ● EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; ● EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and ● EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt. While EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are frequently used by companies as a measure of operating results and performance, neither of those items as prepared by the Company is necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other companies due to differences in methods of calculation. 58 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The following table reconciles net income/(loss), as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA: (Dollars in thousands) Net income Income tax provision Interest expense Depreciation and amortization EBITDA Amortization of time charter contracts acquired Third-party debt modification fees Loss on sale of investments in affiliated companies Gain on disposal of vessels and assets, net of impairments Gain on sale of interest in DASM Write-off of deferred financing costs Loss on extinguishment of debt Adjusted EBITDA 59 International Seaways, Inc. $ $ 2023 2022 556,446 3,878 65,759 129,038 755,121 — 568 — (35,934) — 2,686 1,323 723,764 $ $ 387,891 88 57,721 110,388 556,088 842 1,158 9,513 (19,647) (135) 1,266 — 549,085 Table of Contents LIQUIDITY AND SOURCES OF CAPITAL Our business is capital intensive. Our ability to successfully implement our strategy is dependent on the continued availability of capital on attractive terms. In addition, our ability to successfully operate our business to meet near-term and long-term debt repayment obligations is dependent on maintaining sufficient liquidity. Liquidity As of December 31, 2023, we had total liquidity on a consolidated basis of $601.2 million comprised of $126.8 million of cash, $60.0 million of short-term investments and $414.4 million of undrawn revolver capacity. Working capital at December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $269.5 million and $385.2 million, respectively. Current assets are highly liquid, consisting principally of cash, interest-bearing deposits, short-term investments consisting of time deposits with original maturities of between 91 and 180 days, and receivables. Current liabilities include current installments of long-term debt and finance lease liabilities of $127.4 million and $204.7 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Company’s total cash decreased by $116.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease principally reflects: ● $308.2 million of cash dividends paid to shareholders; ● $13.9 million of shares repurchased; ● $152.2 million in regularly scheduled principal amortization of the Company’s secured debt facilities and lease financing arrangements; ● a $97.0 million debt prepayment made in conjunction with an amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility and release of 22 collateral vessels; ● $181.3 million of debt prepayments made on the $750 Million Credit Facility in conjunction with the release of five Suezmaxes and one Aframax from the collateral package and the sale of three MRs subsequent to the above-mentioned amendment; ● a $45.2 million of prepayment in full on the COSCO Lease Financing; ● $35.4 million in expenditures for vessels and other property including construction costs for three dual-fuel LNG VLCCs, net of proceeds from the issuance of related lease financing and two dual-fuel ready LR1 product carriers; and ● $42.3 million in finance lease liability extinguishments relating to the Company exercising its options to purchase two 2009-built Aframaxes that it had been bareboat chartering-in. Such cash outflows were offset to a large extent by: ● $688.4 million of cash provided by operating activities; ● $66.0 million in proceeds from the disposal of vessels and other assets; and ● a $20.0 million net reduction in cash invested in short-term investments. Our cash and cash equivalents balances generally exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. We place our cash and cash equivalents in what we believe to be credit-worthy financial institutions. In addition, certain of our money market accounts invest in U.S. Treasury securities or other obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies, floating rate and variable demand notes of U.S. and foreign corporations, commercial paper rated in the highest category by Moody’s Investor Services and Standard & Poor’s, certificates of deposit and time deposits, asset-backed securities, and repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2023, we had total debt outstanding (net of original issue discount and deferred financing costs) of $722.7 million and a net debt to total capitalization of 23.8%, which compares with 33.3% at December 31, 2022. Sources, Uses and Management of Capital During 2022, as the tanker cycle recovered from the historical lows of 2021, we increased our overall liquidity with vessel sales, a refinancing that increased the capacity of our revolving credit and cash from operations. With strong market conditions continuing in 2023, we have used incremental liquidity generated from operations to invest in the fleet, reduce debt levels and make returns to shareholders. 60 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents In addition to future operating cash flows, our other future sources of funds are proceeds from issuances of equity securities, additional borrowings as permitted under our loan agreements and proceeds from the opportunistic sales of our vessels. Our current uses of funds are to fund working capital requirements, maintain the quality of our vessels, purchase vessels, pay newbuilding construction costs, comply with international shipping standards and environmental laws and regulations, repay or repurchase our outstanding loan facilities, pay a regular quarterly cash dividend, and from time-to-time, repurchase shares of our common stock and pay supplemental cash dividends. The following is a summary of the significant capital allocation initiatives we executed during 2023 and the sources of capital we have at our disposal for future use as well as our current commitments for future uses of capital: During 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors declared and paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $308.2 million or $6.29 per share as follows: Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date February 27, 2023 May 4, 2023 August 8, 2023 November 6, 2023 March 14, 2023 June 14, 2023 September 13, 2023 December 13, 2023 March 28, 2023 $ June 28, 2023 $ September 27, 2023 $ December 27, 2023 $ Regular Quarterly Dividend per Share 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Supplemental Dividend per Share 1.88 1.50 1.30 1.13 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Dividends Paid (Dollars in Millions) 98.3 79.3 69.4 61.2 Also on February 28, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of common stock and a supplemental dividend of $1.20 per share of common stock. Both dividends will be paid on March 28, 2024 to stockholders of record as of March 14, 2024. During 2023, the Company repurchased and retired 366,483 shares of its common stock in open-market purchases, at an average price of $38.03 per share, for a total cost of $13.9 million. In August 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program to $50.0 million from $26.1 million. In November 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the extension of the expiry date of the stock repurchase program from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2025. In December 2022 the Company tendered notice of its intention to exercise its options to purchase two 2009-built Aframaxes that it had been bareboat chartering-in. The aggregate purchase price for the two vessels was $43.0 million, representing an approximately 45% discount to the market price of the vessels. The first of the two vessels was purchased in March 2023, and the second in early April 2023. On March 10, 2023 the Company entered into an amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility agreement. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company (a) prepaid $97 million of outstanding principal under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan; (b) obtained a release of collateral vessel mortgages over 22 MR product carriers; and (c) received from the lenders additional revolving credit commitments in an aggregate amount of $40 million, which additional commitments constitute an increase to, and are subject to the same terms and conditions as, the previously-existing revolving credit commitments. Following the effectiveness of the amendment, the aggregate principal commitments available under the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan was $257.4 million (none of which was outstanding) and the scheduled future quarterly principal amortization under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan decreased from $30.2 million to $27.7 million. Following the amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility agreement, the Company made mandatory principal prepayments totaling $181.3 million between March 2023 and December 2023 on the $750 Million Facility Term Loan in conjunction with the sale of three 2008-built MRs, and the release of five Suezmaxes and one Aframax vessel from the collateral package. These transactions resulted in a further reduction in the scheduled future quarterly principal amortization under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan to $19.0 million beginning in the first quarter of 2024. In May 2023, the Company tendered notice of its intention to exercise its options to purchase one 2013-built Aframax and one 2014-built LR2, which were bareboat chartered-in under the COSCO Lease Financing arrangement as at June 30, 2023. The $46.4 million aggregate purchase price for the two vessels consisted of the $45.2 million remaining debt balance of the COSCO Lease Financing and $1.2 million of purchase option premiums. The transaction closed on July 3, 2023. 61 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents During the third and fourth quarters of 2023, the Company entered into agreements to construct four dual-fuel ready LNG 73,600 dwt LR1 Product Carriers at K Shipbuilding Co., Ltd’s shipyard, subject to certain conditions customary to similar transactions. The four vessels are scheduled for delivery between the second half of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026. The total construction cost for the vessels will be approximately $231 million, which will be paid for through a combination of long-term financing and available liquidity. On November 24, 2023, the Company entered into an option agreement for the construction of two additional dual-fuel ready LNG 73,600 dwt LR1 Product Carriers at the same shipyard for delivery during the third quarter of 2026 at an additional cost of approximately $116 million. Under the terms of the agreement, as amended, the Company’s option will expire on March 31, 2024. On September 27, 2023, the Company entered into a $160 million revolving credit agreement (the “$160 Million Revolving Credit Facility”) with Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch (“Nordea”), ING Bank N.V., London Branch (“ING”), Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank, and DNB Markets Inc. (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners; and Danish Ship Finance A/S and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (PUBL) (or their respective affiliates), as lead arrangers. Nordea is acting as administrative agent, collateral agent, coordinator and security trustee under the Revolving Credit Agreement, and ING is acting as sustainability coordinator. The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility comprises a 5.5-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of $160 million which matures on March 27, 2029 and reduces on a 20-year age-adjusted profile. The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first lien on five of the Company’s vessels (the “Collateral Vessels”), along with their earnings, insurances and certain other assets, as well as by liens on certain additional assets of the Borrower. Interest on the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility is calculated based upon Term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin (each as defined in the credit agreement). The Applicable Margin is 1.90%, and is subject to a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism, pursuant to which the Applicable Margin may be decreased or increased by 0.075%, as described in greater detail in Note 10, “Debt,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” On December 20, 2023, the Company adopted an “at the market” offering program in connection with general corporate housekeeping and entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”) with Evercore Group L.L.C. and Jefferies LLC, as sales agents (the “Sales Agents”), to issue and sell through or to the Sales Agents, from time to time, shares of its common stock, in “at the market” offerings having an aggregate gross sales price of up to $100 million. As of the date hereof, the Company has neither sold nor undertaken to sell any shares pursuant to the Distribution Agreement. The Company has no obligation to sell any shares and may at any time suspend offers under the Distribution Agreement or terminate the Distribution Agreement. See Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities,” for further details on the offering program. As of December 31, 2023, the Company has vessel construction commitments for four dual-fuel ready LR1s and the purchase and installation of three ballast water treatment systems and two mewis ducts, and the final outstanding installment payments due for six ballast water treatment systems that had been installed as of December 31, 2023. The Company’s debt service commitments and aggregate purchase commitments for vessel construction and betterments as of December 31, 2023, are presented in the Aggregate Contractual Obligations Table below. During the first quarter of 2024, we continued to execute on our fleet optimization program by entering into agreements for the en bloc purchase of four 2015-built and two 2014- built MR Product Carriers for an aggregate purchase price of $232 million. Eighty-five percent of the purchase price consideration will be paid for with cash from available liquidity and the balance of 15% with the issuance of INSW common stock. Delivery of the vessels is expected to be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2024. Outlook Our strong balance sheet, as evidenced by a substantial level of liquidity, 30 unencumbered vessels, and diversified financing sources with debt maturities spread out between 2026 and 2031, positions us to support our operations over the next twelve months as we continue to advance our vessel employment strategy, which seeks to achieve an optimal mix of spot (voyage charter) and long-term (time charter) charters. Our balance sheet strength and diverse fleet position us to continue pursuing our disciplined capital allocation strategy of fleet renewal, incremental debt reduction and returns to shareholders and pursue potential strategic opportunities that may arise within the diverse sectors in which we operate. Aggregate Contractual Obligations 62 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents A summary of the Company’s long-term contractual obligations as of December 31, 2023 follows: (Dollars in thousands) $750 Million Facility Term Loan - floating rate(1) ING Credit Facility - floating rate(2) Ocean Yield Lease Financing - floating rate(3) BoComm Lease Financing - fixed rate(4) Toshin Lease Financing - fixed rate(4) Hyuga Lease Financing - fixed rate(4) Kaiyo Lease Financing - fixed rate(4) Kaisha Lease Financing - fixed rate(4) Operating lease obligations(5) Time Charter-ins Office and other space Vessel and vessel betterment commitments(6) Total 2024 80,869 3,635 53,588 23,826 2,223 2,456 2,250 2,250 2025 38,316 3,474 51,538 23,761 2,160 2,232 2,250 2,438 2026 — 17,896 51,097 23,761 2,160 2,232 2,410 2,225 11,558 1,261 28,182 212,098 $ 5,624 1,093 127,028 259,914 $ — 1,113 69,288 172,182 $ $ $ 2027 — — 50,126 23,762 2,151 2,232 2,214 2,214 — 1,077 — 83,776 $ 2028 — — 47,431 23,826 2,223 2,160 2,214 2,214 — 1,077 — 81,145 $ Beyond 2028 — $ — 201,607 166,034 6,934 6,416 4,341 4,501 — 4,754 — 394,587 $ Total 119,185 25,005 455,387 284,970 17,851 17,728 15,679 15,842 17,182 10,375 224,498 1,203,702 (1) Amounts shown include contractual interest obligations of floating rate debt estimated based on the applicable margin for the $750 Million Facility Term Loan of 2.45%, plus the fixed rate stated in the related interest rate swaps of 2.84%. (2) Amounts shown include contractual interest obligations of outstanding floating rate debt estimated based on the applicable margin, plus credit adjustment spread of 0.26% and plus the effective three-month SOFR rate as of December 31, 2023 of 5.37% for the ING Credit Facility. (3) Amounts shown include contractual interest obligations on $311.9 million of outstanding floating rate debt estimated based on the applicable margin for the Ocean Yield Lease Financing of 4.05% plus 0.26% of credit adjustment spread and the fixed rate stated in the interest rate swaps (assigned for accounting purposes) of 2.84% on $224.3 million of notional principal amount outstanding and the effective three-month SOFR rate as of December 31, 2023 of 5.39% for the remaining outstanding principal under the Ocean Yield Lease Financing. (4) Amounts shown include contractual implicit interest obligations of the lease financing under the bareboat charters. (5) As of December 31, 2023, the Company had charter-in commitments for one vessel on a lease that is accounted for as an operating lease. The full amounts due under office and other space leases and the lease component of the amounts due under long term time charter-ins are discounted and reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as lease liabilities with corresponding right of use asset balances. (6) Represents the Company’s commitments for the purchase and installation of nine ballast water treatment systems and two mewis duct systems, and the Company’s remaining commitment for the construction of four dual-fuel ready LR1s. In addition to the above long-term contractual commitments, we have certain obligations for our shore-based employees as of December 31, 2023, related to a defined benefit pension plan in the U.K. as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Defined benefit pension plan contributions(1) Total 2024 1,455 1,455 $ $ $ $ 2025 760 760 $ $ 2026 783 783 $ $ 2027 807 807 $ $ 2028 831 831 $ $ Beyond 2028 3,580 3,580 $ $ Total 8,216 8,216 (1) Represents estimated employer contributions under the OSG Ship Management (UK) Ltd. Retirement Benefits Plan (the “Scheme”), pursuant to the Scheme's additional funding objective from the Plan’s current schedule of contributions dated October 24, 2023. The Scheme is currently underfunded for financial reporting purposes. The originally scheduled deficit reduction contribution of approximately $0.7 million to the Plan during 2023 was deferred until 2024 by agreement with the Scheme trustees. The Company and the trustees of the Scheme have agreed to target achieving a funding level that would permit the 63 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents securing of the Scheme’s obligations with an insurance company by 2025. The contributions are subject to change after an actuarial estimate of the Scheme's funding level is produced. Carrying Value of Vessels At December 31, 2023, 42 of the Company’s 72 owned and bareboat chartered-in vessels were pledged as collateral under certain of the Company’s debt and lease financing facilities. The following table presents information with respect to the carrying amount of the Company’s vessels by type. Instances in which the fair market values of the Company’s vessels, which are estimated by a third-party vessel appraiser, are below their carrying values as of December 31, 2023, are indicated in the footnote(s) to the table. The carrying value of each of the Company’s vessels does not necessarily represent its fair market value or the amount that could be obtained if the vessel were sold. The Company’s estimates of market values for its vessels assume that the vessels are all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and, if inspected, would be certified as being in class without notations. In addition, because vessel values are highly volatile, these estimates may not be indicative of either the current or future prices that the Company could achieve if it were to sell any of the vessels. The Company would not record a loss for any of the vessels for which the fair market value is below its carrying value unless and until the Company either determines to sell the vessel for a loss or determines that the vessel is impaired as discussed below in “Critical Accounting Policies — Vessel Impairment.” The Company believes that the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned over the estimated remaining useful lives for those vessels that have experienced declines in market values below their carrying values would exceed such vessels’ carrying values. Footnotes to the following table exclude those vessels with an estimated market value in excess of their carrying value. (Dollars in thousands) Crude Tankers VLCC Suezmax Aframax Total Crude Tankers(1) Product Carriers LR2 LR1 MR Total Product Carriers Fleet total Average Vessel Age (weighted by dwt) Number of Vessels Carrying Value 7.8 9.8 11.8 8.7 9.4 14.6 14.3 14.1 10.1 13 13 4 30 1 6 35 42 72 $ $ $ $ $ 895,979 390,075 96,099 1,382,153 49,431 89,944 389,262 528,637 1,910,790 (1) As of December 31, 2023, the Crude Tankers segment includes a vessel with a carrying value of $65.7 million, which the Company believes exceeds its aggregate market value of approximately $62.9 million by $2.8 million. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Pursuant to an agreement between INSW and the trustees of the OSG Ship Management (UK) Ltd. Retirement Benefits Plan (the “Scheme”), INSW guarantees the obligations of INSW Ship Management UK Ltd., a subsidiary of INSW, to make payments to the Scheme. See Note 17, “Pension and other postretirement benefit plans,” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements as set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information. RISK MANAGEMENT Interest rate risk The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, which could impact its results of operations and financial condition. The Company manages this exposure to market risk through its regular operating and financing activities and, when 64 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. To manage its interest rate risk exposure associated with changes in variable interest rate payments due on its credit facilities in a cost-effective manner, the Company, from time-to-time, enters into interest rate swap, collar or cap agreements, in which it agrees to exchange various combinations of fixed and variable interest rates based on agreed upon notional amounts or to receive payments if floating interest rates rise above a specified cap rate. The Company uses such derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for speculative or trading purposes. In addition, derivative financial instruments are entered into with a diversified group of major financial institutions in order to manage exposure to nonperformance on such instruments by the counterparties. See “Interest Rate Sensitivity” section below and Note 9, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivative and Fair Value Disclosures,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” for additional information on the Company various interest rate derivatives. Currency and exchange rate risk The shipping industry’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. All of the Company’s revenues and most of its operating costs are in U.S. dollars. The Company incurs certain operating expenses, such as some vessel and general and administrative expenses, in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, and the foreign exchange risk associated with these operating expenses is immaterial. If foreign exchange risk becomes material in the future, the Company may seek to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates through the use of short-term currency forward contracts and through the purchase of bulk quantities of currencies at rates that management considers favorable. For contracts which qualify as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, hedge effectiveness would be assessed based on changes in foreign exchange spot rates with the change in fair value of the effective portions being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). Fuel price volatility risk The Company has installed scrubbers on ten VLCCs and two of its Suezmaxes. During 2023, the average price differential between very low sulfur fuel and high sulfur fuel in Singapore and Fujairah, the most common bunkering locations for VLCCs, was approximately $158 per ton. Assuming a VLCC bunker consumption rate of 50 metric tons per day, this translated to approximately $7,900 per day per vessel in lower bunker consumption costs on our VLCCs during 2023. In addition to installing scrubbers on certain of the larger vessels in the Company’s fleet, significant consideration continues to be given to other ways of managing the risk of volatility in the price spread between high-sulfur fuel and low- sulfur fuel as well as the risk of limited supply of compliant fuel or HFO along the routes that the Company’s vessels typically travel. Interest Rate Sensitivity The following table presents information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents the principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates of the Company’s debt obligations. Principal (Notional) Amount (dollars in millions) by Expected Maturity and Average Interest (Swap) Rate (Dollars in millions) Liabilities Debt Fixed rate debt Average interest rate Variable rate debt (1) Average interest rate (1) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Beyond 2028 Total Fair Value at Dec. 31, 2023 $ $ 20.0 4.59% 107.4 7.54% $ $ 20.9 4.57% 68.8 7.78% $ $ 21.9 4.54% 45.9 7.79% $ $ 22.8 4.51% 29.2 9.55% $ $ 23.9 4.47% 29.3 9.70% $ $ 178.2 5.33% 165.8 9.70% $ $ 287.6 446.3 $ $ 262.3 446.3 (1) Rates are discussed in the aggregate contractual obligations section above. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had variable rate secured term loans or lease financings, and revolving credit facilities under which borrowings bear interest at a rate based on SOFR, plus the applicable margin, as stated in the respective financing arrangements. The Company has entered into interest rate swaps agreements with major financial institutions covering for accounting 65 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents purposes 100% of the $750 Million Facility Term Loan outstanding principal balance of $113.6 million as of December 31, 2023, and $224.3 million of the notional principal amount outstanding under the Ocean Yield Lease Financing that effectively converts the Company’s interest rate exposure from a three-month SOFR floating rate to a fixed rate of 2.84% through the maturity date of February 22, 2027. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require the Company to make estimates in the application of its accounting policies based on the best assumptions, judgments, and opinions of management. Following is a discussion of the accounting policies that involve a higher degree of judgment and the methods of their application. For a description of all of the Company’s material accounting policies, see Note 3, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Vessel Lives and Salvage Values The carrying value of each of the Company’s vessels represents its original cost at the time it was delivered or purchased less depreciation calculated using an estimated useful life of 25 years from the date such vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard. A vessel’s carrying value is reduced to its new cost basis (i.e., its current fair value) if a vessel impairment charge is recorded. If the estimated useful lives assigned to the Company’s vessels prove to be shorter than previously estimated because of new regulations, an extended period of weak markets, the broad imposition of age restrictions by the Company’s customers, or other future events, it could result in higher depreciation expense and impairment losses in future periods related to a reduction in the useful lives of any affected vessels. Company management estimates the steel recycle value of all of its vessels to be $300 per lightweight ton consistent with its commitment to implement and practice environmentally and socially responsible ship recycling. The Company’s assumptions used in the determination of estimated salvage value take into account current steel recycling prices, the historic pattern of annual average steel recycling rates over the five years ended December 31, 2023, which ranged from $270 to $670 per lightweight ton, estimated changes in future market demand for recycled steel and estimated future demand for vessels. Steel recycling prices also fluctuate depending upon type of ship, bunkers on board, spares on board and delivery range. Market conditions that could influence the volume and pricing of vessel recycling activity in 2024 and beyond include (i) the combined impact of scheduled newbuild deliveries and charter rate expectations for vessels potentially facing age restrictions imposed by oil majors, (ii) the impact of ballast water treatment systems regulatory requirements or proposals, (iii) costs and timing of pending special surveys, which are likely to be expensive for vessels over 15 years of age, and (iv) IMO requirements for the use of low-sulfur fuels and other carbon reduction initiatives. These factors will influence owners’ decisions to accelerate the disposal of older vessels, especially those with upcoming special surveys. Although management believes that the assumptions used to determine the steel recycling value for its vessels are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective, in part, because of the cyclicality of the nature of future demand for recycled steel. Vessel Impairment The carrying values of the Company’s vessels may not represent their fair market value or the amount that could be obtained by selling the vessel at any point in time since the market prices of second-hand vessels tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and the cost of newbuildings. Historically, both charter rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical. Management evaluates the carrying amounts of vessels held and used by the Company for impairment only when it determines that it will sell a vessel or when events or changes in circumstances occur that cause management to believe that future cash flows for any individual vessel will be less than its carrying value. In such instances, an impairment charge would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the vessel and its eventual disposition is less than the vessel’s carrying amount. This assessment is made at the individual vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available. 66 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents In developing estimates of future cash flows, the Company must make assumptions about future performance, with significant assumptions being related to charter rates, operating expenses, utilization, drydocking and capital expenditure requirements, residual value and the estimated remaining useful lives of the vessels. These assumptions are based on historical trends as well as future expectations. Specifically, in estimating future charter rates, management takes into consideration rates currently in effect for existing time charters and estimated daily time charter equivalent rates for each vessel class for the unfixed days over the estimated remaining lives of each of the vessels. The estimated daily time charter equivalent rates used for unfixed days are based on a combination of (i) rates as forecasted by third-party analysts, and (ii) the trailing 12-year historical average rates, based on monthly average rates published by a third-party maritime research service. Management uses the published 12-year historical average rates in its assumptions because it is management’s belief that the 12-year period captures a distribution of strong and weak charter rate periods, which results in the use of an average mid-cycle rate that is more in line with management’s forecast of a return to mid-cycle charter rate levels in the medium term. Recognizing that the transportation of crude oil and petroleum products is cyclical and subject to significant volatility based on factors beyond the Company’s control, management believes the use of estimates based on the combination of rates forecasted by third-party analysts and 12-year historical average rates calculated as of the reporting date to be reasonable. Estimated outflows for operating expenses and capital expenditures and drydocking requirements are based on historical and budgeted costs and are adjusted for assumed inflation. Utilization is based on historical levels achieved and estimates of residual value for recycling are based upon the pattern of steel recycling rates used in management’s evaluation of salvage value for purposes of recording depreciation. Finally, for vessels that are being considered for disposal before the end of their respective useful lives, the Company utilizes weighted probabilities assigned to the possible outcomes for such vessels being sold or recycled before the end of their respective useful lives. The determination of fair value is highly judgmental. In estimating the fair value of INSW’s vessels for purposes of Step 2 of the impairment tests, the Company considers the market and income approaches by using a combination of third-party appraisals and discounted cash flow models prepared by the Company. In preparing the discounted cash flow models, the Company uses a methodology consistent with the methodology discussed above in relation to the undiscounted cash flow models prepared by the Company and discounts the cash flows using its current estimate of INSW’s weighted average cost of capital. The more significant factors that could impact management’s assumptions regarding time charter equivalent rates include (i) loss or reduction in business from significant customers, (ii) unanticipated changes in demand for transportation of crude oil and petroleum products, (iii) changes in production of or demand for oil and petroleum products, generally or in particular regions, (iv) greater than anticipated levels of tanker newbuilding orders or lower than anticipated levels of tanker recycling, and (v) changes in rules and regulations applicable to the tanker industry, including legislation adopted by international organizations such as IMO and the EU or by individual countries. Although management believes that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate at the time they were made, such assumptions are highly subjective and likely to change, possibly materially, in the future. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK See Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —Risk Management” and “— Interest Rate Sensitivity.” 67 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS Years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2023 and 2022 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP, New York, NY, Auditor Firm ID:42) 68 International Seaways, Inc. Page 69 70 71 72 73 74 119 Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31 DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 ASSETS Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Voyage receivables, net of allowance for credit losses of $191 and $261, including unbilled of $237,298 and $279,567 Other receivables Inventories Prepaid expenses and other current assets Current portion of derivative asset Total Current Assets Vessels and other property, less accumulated depreciation Vessels construction in progress Deferred drydock expenditures, net Operating lease right-of-use assets Finance lease right-of-use assets Pool working capital deposits Long-term derivative assets Other assets Total Assets LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Current Liabilities: Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities Current portion of operating lease liabilities Current portion of finance lease liabilities Current installments of long-term debt Total Current Liabilities Long-term operating lease liabilities Long-term debt, net Other liabilities Total Liabilities Commitments and contingencies Equity: Capital - 100,000,000 no par value shares authorized; 48,925,562 and 49,120,648 shares issued and outstanding Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit) Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income Total Equity Total Liabilities and Equity See notes to consolidated financial statements 69 International Seaways, Inc. $ $ $ $ 126,760 60,000 $ 247,165 14,303 1,329 10,342 5,081 464,980 1,914,426 11,670 70,880 20,391 — 31,748 1,153 6,571 2,521,819 57,904 10,223 — 127,447 195,574 11,631 595,229 2,628 805,062 1,490,986 226,834 1,717,820 (1,063) 1,716,757 2,521,819 $ $ $ 243,744 80,000 289,775 12,583 531 8,995 6,987 642,615 1,680,010 123,940 65,611 8,471 44,391 35,593 4,662 10,041 2,615,334 51,069 1,596 41,870 162,854 257,389 7,740 860,578 1,875 1,127,582 1,502,235 (21,447) 1,480,788 6,964 1,487,752 2,615,334 Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS Shipping Revenues: Pool revenues, including $313,873, $210,409 and $72,557 from affiliated companies accounted for by the equity method Time and bareboat charter revenues Voyage charter revenues Operating Expenses: Voyage expenses Vessel expenses Charter hire expenses Depreciation and amortization General and administrative Third-party debt modification fees Merger and integration related costs Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets, net of impairments Total operating expenses Income/(loss) from vessel operations Equity in income of affiliated companies Operating income/(loss) Other income/(expense) Income/(loss) before interest expense and income taxes Interest expense Income/(loss) before income taxes Income tax provision Net income/(loss) Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest Net income/(loss) attributable to the Company Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding: Basic Diluted Per Share Amounts: Basic net income/(loss) per share Diluted net income/(loss) per share See notes to consolidated financial statements 70 International Seaways, Inc. 2023 2022 2021 905,808 $ 96,544 69,423 1,071,775 16,256 259,539 39,404 129,038 47,473 568 — (35,934) 456,344 615,431 — 615,431 10,652 626,083 (65,759) 560,324 (3,878) 556,446 — 556,446 $ 774,922 $ 33,034 56,709 864,665 10,955 240,674 32,132 110,388 46,351 1,158 — (19,647) 422,011 442,654 714 443,368 2,332 445,700 (57,721) 387,979 (88) 387,891 — 387,891 $ 175,997 50,094 46,455 272,546 16,686 183,057 23,934 86,674 33,235 110 50,740 (9,753) 384,683 (112,137) 21,838 (90,299) (5,947) (96,246) (36,796) (133,042) (1,618) (134,660) (1,168) (133,492) 48,978,452 49,428,967 49,381,459 49,844,904 38,407,007 38,407,007 11.35 $ 11.25 $ 7.85 $ 7.77 $ (3.48) (3.48) $ $ $ $ Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS Net income/(loss) Other Comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax: Net change in unrealized gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges Defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans: Net change in unrecognized prior service costs Net change in unrecognized actuarial losses Other Comprehensive (loss)/income, net of tax Comprehensive income/(loss) Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to the Company See notes to consolidated financial statements 71 International Seaways, Inc. 2023 2022 2021 $ 556,446 $ 387,891 $ (134,660) (7,563) (59) (405) (8,027) 548,419 — 548,419 $ 21,775 (335) (2,116) 19,324 407,215 — 407,215 $ 19,235 54 964 20,253 (114,407) (1,168) (113,239) $ Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS Cash Flows from Operating Activities: Net income/(loss) Items included in net income/(loss) not affecting cash flows: Depreciation and amortization Loss on write-down of vessels and other assets Amortization of debt discount and other deferred financing costs Amortization of time charter hire contracts acquired Deferred financing costs write-off Stock compensation Earnings of affiliated companies Merger and integration related costs, noncash Other – net Items included in net income/(loss) related to investing and financing activities: Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets, net Loss on extinguishment of debt Loss on sale of investment in affiliated companies Cash distributions from affiliated companies Payments for drydocking Insurance claims proceeds related to vessel operations Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Decrease/(increase) in receivables Increase/(decrease) in deferred revenue Net change in inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets and accounts payable, accrued expense, and other current and long-term liabilities Net cash provided by/(used in) by operating activities Cash Flows from Investing Activities: Cash acquired, net of equity issuance costs related to merger Expenditures for vessels, vessel improvements and vessels under construction Proceeds from disposal of vessels and other assets Expenditures for other property Pool working capital deposits Proceeds from sale of investment in affiliated companies Investments in short-term time deposits Proceeds from maturities of short-term time deposits Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities Cash Flows from Financing Activities: Borrowings on long term debt, net of lenders' fees Borrowings on revolving credit facilities Repayments on revolving credit facilities Repayments of debt Premium and fees on extinguishment of debt Proceeds from sale and leaseback financing, net of issuance and deferred financing costs Payments on sale and leaseback financing and finance lease Payments of deferred financing costs Cash payments on derivatives containing other-than-insignificant financing element Cash dividends paid Repurchases of common stock Distribution to noncontrolling interest Cash paid to tax authority upon vesting or exercise of stock-based compensation Net cash used in by financing activities Net (decrease)/increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year See notes to consolidated financial statements 72 International Seaways, Inc. 2023 2022 2021 $ 556,446 $ 387,891 $ (134,660) 129,038 — 5,623 — 2,686 8,518 20 — (2,562) (35,934) 1,323 — — (34,539) 3,156 42,610 3,283 8,734 688,402 — (205,159) 66,002 (1,471) (3,639) — (235,000) 255,000 (124,267) — 50,000 (50,000) (382,050) (1,323) 169,717 (135,965) (3,577) — (308,154) (13,948) — (5,819) (681,119) (116,984) 243,744 126,760 $ 110,388 1,697 5,224 842 1,266 6,746 (10,297) — (2,242) (21,344) — 9,513 3,111 (43,327) 5,301 (182,679) 2,609 13,102 287,801 — (115,976) 99,157 (710) 1,362 138,966 (105,000) 25,000 42,799 641,050 — — (798,740) — 108,005 (39,240) (909) — (69,841) (20,017) — (6,097) (185,789) 144,811 98,933 243,744 $ 86,674 3,497 2,313 2,428 2,113 10,529 (21,838) 31,053 2,969 (13,250) 4,465 — 9,835 (42,416) 1,846 (16,470) (1,636) (3,644) (76,192) 54,047 (78,035) 165,809 (979) (7,554) — — — 133,288 83,712 — — (619,273) — 447,086 (5,678) — (15,697) (40,939) (16,660) (5,266) (1,125) (173,840) (116,744) 215,677 98,933 $ Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS Retained Earnings / (Accumulated Deficit) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Noncontrolling Interests (275,846)$ — — (133,492) — — — — — — — — (409,338) 387,891 — — — — — — — — (21,447) 556,446 — (308,165) — — — — — 226,834 $ (32,613)$ — — — 20,253 — — — — — — — (12,360) — 19,324 — — — — — — — 6,964 — (8,027) — — — — — — (1,063)$ — $ 30,478 (23,460) (1,168) — — (5,266) — — — — — 584 — — — (584) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — $ Capital 1,280,501 $ 359,148 — — — (40,947) — (1,125) 3,868 5,416 1,245 (16,660) 1,591,446 — — (69,843) — (6,097) 1,175 4,583 988 (20,017) 1,502,235 — — — (5,819) 1,045 6,899 574 (13,948) 1,490,986 $ $ $ Total 972,042 389,626 (23,460) (134,660) 20,253 (40,947) (5,266) (1,125) 3,868 5,416 1,245 (16,660) 1,170,332 387,891 19,324 (69,843) (584) (6,097) 1,175 4,583 988 (20,017) 1,487,752 556,446 (8,027) (308,165) (5,819) 1,045 6,899 574 (13,948) 1,716,757 Balance at January 1, 2021 Issuance of common stock related to merger Derecognition of noncontrolling interest Net loss Other comprehensive income Dividends declared Distribution to noncontrolling interest Forfeitures of vested restricted stock awards Compensation relating to restricted stock awards Compensation relating to restricted stock units awards Compensation relating to stock option awards Repurchase of common stock Balance at December 31, 2021 Net income Other comprehensive income Dividends declared Impact of deconsolidating DASM Forfeitures of vested restricted stock awards and exercised stock options Compensation relating to restricted stock awards Compensation relating to restricted stock units awards Compensation relating to stock option awards Repurchase of common stock Balance at December 31, 2022 Net income Other comprehensive loss Dividends declared Forfeitures of vested restricted stock awards and exercised stock options Compensation relating to restricted stock awards Compensation relating to restricted stock units awards Compensation relating to stock option awards Repurchase of common stock Balance at December 31, 2023 See notes to consolidated financial statements 73 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION: Nature of the Business International Seaways, Inc. (“INSW”), a Marshall Islands corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company” or “INSW,” or “we” or “us” or “our”) are engaged primarily in the ocean transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in international markets. The Marshall Islands is the principal flag of registry of the Company’s vessels. The Company’s business is currently organized into two reportable segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. The crude oil fleet is comprised of most major crude oil vessel classes. The products fleet transports refined petroleum product cargoes from refineries to consuming markets characterized by both long and short-haul routes. As of December 31, 2023, the Company owned or operated a fleet of 73 wholly-owned or lease financed and time chartered-in oceangoing vessels. In addition to its operating fleet of 73 vessels, four LR1 newbuilds are scheduled for delivery to the Company between the second half of 2025 and first quarter of 2026, bringing the total operating and newbuild fleet to 77 vessels as of December 31, 2023. The Company’s operating fleet list excludes vessels chartered-in where the duration of the charter was one year or less at inception. Vessels chartered-in may be bareboat charters or time charters. Under either a bareboat charter or time charter, a customer pays a daily or monthly rate for a fixed period of time for use of the vessel. Under a bareboat charter, the customer pays all costs of operating the vessel, including voyage expenses, such as fuel, canal tolls and port charges, and vessel expenses such as crew costs, vessel stores and supplies, lubricating oils, maintenance and repair, insurance and communications associated with operating the vessel. Under a time charter, the customer pays all voyage expenses and the shipowner pays all vessel expenses. Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions within the Company have been eliminated. Investments in 50% or less owned affiliated companies, in which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for by the equity method. NOTE 2 — MERGER TRANSACTION Completion of Merger Transaction On July 16, 2021 (the “Effective Time”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) dated as of March 30, 2021, by and among INSW, Diamond S Shipping Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation (“Diamond S”), and Dispatch Transaction Sub, Inc., a Republic of the Marshall Islands corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of INSW (“Merger Sub”), Merger Sub merged with and into Diamond S (the “Merger”), with Diamond S surviving such merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of INSW. Immediately following the Effective Time, the Company contributed all of the outstanding stock of Diamond S to International Seaways Operating Corporation, a direct wholly- owned subsidiary of the Company. At the Effective Time, each common share of Diamond S (the “Diamond S Common Shares”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding Diamond S Common Shares owned by Diamond S, the Company, Merger Sub or any of their respective direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries) was cancelled in exchange for the right to receive 0.55375 of a share of common stock of the Company (the “INSW Common Stock”) and cash payable in respect of fractional shares. The aforementioned 0.55375 exchange ratio set forth in the Merger Agreement resulted in the issuance of 22,536,647 shares of INSW Common Stock, with the pre-Merger INSW shareholders and the former Diamond S shareholders owning approximately 55.75% and 44.25%, respectively, of the 50,674,393 issued and outstanding common stock of the Company immediately following the Effective Time. As provided for under the terms of the Merger Agreement, on July 15, 2021, prior to the Effective Time, INSW paid a special dividend to its shareholders of record as of July 14, 2021 in an aggregate amount equal to $31.5 million ($1.12 per share). 74 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Amended and Restated Debt Agreements In connection with the Merger, lenders under Diamond S’ existing credit facilities agreed, among other things, to consent to the Merger and waive any event of default that would arise as a result of the Merger. On May 27, 2021, the Company entered into Amendment and Restatement Agreements with (i) Diamond S, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders constituting the Required Lenders under that certain credit agreement of Diamond S first dated as of March 27, 2019 (the “$360 Million Credit Agreement”) in order to amend and restate Diamond S’ $360 Million Credit Agreement (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated $360 Million Credit Agreement”) and (ii) Diamond S, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, and the lenders constituting the Required Lenders under that certain credit agreement of Diamond S, first dated as of December 23, 2019 (the “$525 Million Credit Agreement”), in order to amend and restate Diamond S’ $525 Million Credit Agreement (as amended and restated, the “Amended and Restated $525 Million Credit Agreement” and together with the Amended and Restated $360 Million Credit Agreement, the “Amendment and Restatement Agreements”). On May 27, 2021, the Company executed a guarantee of Diamond S’ obligations under each of the Amended and Restated $360 Million Credit Agreement and the Amended and Restated $525 Million Credit Agreement (the “INSW Guarantees”). At the Effective Time, as a result of the consummation of the Merger, and following the payment by Diamond S of fees required to be paid to the lenders, the Amendment and Restatement Agreements and INSW Guarantees became effective. Directors and Certain Officers Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, following the Effective Time, the Company had a board of directors (the “Board”) consisting of ten directors comprised of (i) a chairman, Douglas D. Wheat, designated by the Company, (ii) six additional directors, designated by the Company and (iii) three additional directors, designated by Diamond S. Effective as of the Effective Time, as contemplated by the Merger Agreement to permit three directors designated by Diamond S to serve on the Board, Mr. Ty E. Wallach resigned as a member of the Board. Mr. Wallach was a member of the Human Resources and Compensation committee of the Board. In connection with his resignation from the Board, the Board approved the accelerated vesting of his 5,035 shares of restricted INSW Common Stock. The three vacancies created by the resignation of Mr. Wallach and the expansion of the Board were filled by the Board with Mr. Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Mrs. A. Kate Blankenship and Mr. Nadim Qureshi, the three directors designated by Diamond S in accordance with the Merger Agreement. Each of Mr. Stevenson, Mrs. Blankenship and Mr. Qureshi was a director of Diamond S immediately prior to the Effective Time and served as a member of the Board from the Effective Time through December 31, 2023. During this period, Mrs. Blankenship served as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board and Mr. Qureshi served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board. In connection with joining the Board, Mr. Stevenson, Mrs. Blankenship and Mr. Qureshi entered into customary indemnification agreements with the Company. On July 14, 2021, in connection with the consummation of the Merger, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Mr. Stevenson (the “Letter Agreement”). The Letter Agreement provided that during the period from July 14, 2021, until the earlier of six months following such date and the date of termination of such engagement, in addition to serving as a director, Mr. Stevenson would provide services to the Company as special advisor to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. During the advisory period, Mr. Stevenson received a total consulting fee equal to $0.5 million, paid in equal monthly installments. Following the Merger, the senior management of INSW remained in their roles and have continued to lead the Company. Accounting for the Merger Based on the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Merger was determined to not meet the requirements of a business combination under the guidelines of ASC 805, Business Combinations, and ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805). The Merger consisted of acquiring vessels and associated assets and liabilities, which were concentrated in a group of similar identifiable assets, and therefore not considered a business. As a result, the Merger was treated as an asset acquisition, whereby all assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at the cost of the acquisition, including transaction costs, on the basis of their relative fair value. 75 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The following table presents a summary of how the consideration paid by INSW for the net assets acquired was determined: (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Diamond S outstanding shares Exchange ratio INSW common stock issued to Diamond S shareholders Replacement unvested restricted stock awards issued to Diamond S employees Total INSW common stock issued Closing price per share Total value of INSW common stock and replacement awards issued Replacement awards allocated to post-combination vesting Consideration transferred Consideration transferred not related to value of net assets acquired Consideration transferred related to value of net assets acquired Amounts 40,566,455 0.55375 22,463,653 72,994 (a) 22,536,647 16.00 360,586 (556) (a) 360,030 (31,053) (b) 328,977 $ $ $ $ $ $ (a) Unvested Diamond S restricted stock awards of 131,845 as of the Effective Time were assumed by INSW and replaced with INSW restricted stock awards of 72,994, after giving effect to the exchange ratio and appropriate adjustments to reflect the consummation of the Merger. ASC 805, Business Combinations, requires an allocation of the fair- value-based measure of a replacement award to pre-combination service and post-combination service, with the value attributable to pre-combination service included in the consideration transferred and the value attributable to post-combination service recognized as compensation cost by the acquirer. The fair-value-based measure of such replacement award attributable to post-combination service was determined to be $0.6 million. (b) ASC 805 requires an evaluation of all consideration transferred by the acquirer to identify the inclusion of any payments that might be related to goods and services that are separate from the combination. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Diamond S’ management services agreements with Capital Ship Management Corp (“CSMC”) were terminated and a termination fee of approximately $31.1 million was paid by Diamond S. As INSW was the recipient of the future economic benefits of such restructuring activities, such termination fee was deemed to be a cost incurred by the acquiree on behalf of the acquirer and was considered as part of the consideration transferred that was not related to the fair value of the net assets acquired. As a result, the consideration transferred allocated to the net assets acquired was reduced by the termination fee amount. Supplemental cash flow information for the year ended December 31, 2021 associated with the stock-for-stock acquisition of vessels and associated assets and liabilities aggregating $329.0 million were non-cash investing activities. The Company incurred and paid $0.9 million in equity issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2021. 76 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The following table presents the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed as well as the calculation of the excess of the net assets acquired over the consideration transferred by INSW: (Dollars in thousands) Vessels and other property, net Cash Voyage receivables, net of allowance for credit losses of $1,213 Other receivables Inventories Prepaid expenses and other current assets Restricted cash Advances to Norient pool Time charter contracts acquired, net Operating lease right-of-use assets Other noncurrent assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities Operating lease liabilities Current and noncurrent debt Derivative liabilities, net Noncontrolling interests Net asset value acquired Consideration transferred related to value of net assets acquired Excess of net asset value acquired over consideration transferred Fair Value 1,260,513 48,538 47,264 7,223 17,352 4,830 6,392 7,911 4,868 5,087 1,487 (37,937) (5,087) (678,622) (346) (30,478) 658,995 328,977 330,018 $ $ $ $ The Company reassessed whether it had correctly identified all of the assets acquired and all of the liabilities assumed and determined that it did and that the fair values of the net assets acquired remained in excess of the consideration transferred. As the merger was accounted for as an asset acquisition, in accordance with ASC 805, the $330.0 million excess of net assets acquired over the consideration transferred was allocated on a relative fair value basis to all qualifying assets, which were determined to be the vessels, the above market time charter contracts, and the operating lease right-of-use assets acquired. The $1,260.5 million value of the 64 vessels acquired was comprised of (i) $1,249.1 million in vessel fair values assessed in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, using an average of current valuations obtained from third-party vessel appraisals, (ii) $6.6 million of the initial lube oil inventory on board the vessels on the acquisition date and (iii) $4.8 million in deposits for ballast water treatment system installations. Deferred drydock expenditures were taken into consideration in the vessel appraisals obtained to determine the market values of the vessels acquired and were therefore not identified as a separate asset acquired. In accordance with the requirements of accounting for the Merger as an asset acquisition, the value of the vessels was adjusted down to $943.2 million after the allocation of $328.1 million of the $330.0 million excess of net assets acquired over the consideration transferred and the capitalization of approximately $10.8 million of legal, advisory and other professional fees directly related to the Merger. The $10.8 million is included in expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021. In accordance with ASC 820, the above market time charter contracts were recorded at their estimated fair value of $4.9 million at the time of the Merger taking into consideration future cash flows under the stated time charter rates compared to estimated future market-based charter rates using a discounted cash flow model. The value of the time charter contracts acquired was adjusted down to $4.4 million after the allocation of $0.5 million of the $330.0 million excess of net assets acquired over the consideration transferred. The operating lease right-of-use asset and the corresponding operating lease liabilities of $5.1 million, respectively, relate to Diamond S’ former headquarters office space lease expiring July 2026. The value of the operating lease right-of-use asset was adjusted down to $3.7 million after the allocation of $1.4 million of the $330.0 million excess of net assets acquired over the consideration transferred. The Company derecognized the lease liability and right of use asset for this office space upon termination of the lease on September 30, 2021 and recognized a gain of $0.8 million, net of broker and termination fees. Such gain is included in (gain)/loss on disposal of vessels and other assets, including impairments in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021. 77 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The fair value of Diamond S’ secured borrowings assumed as part of the Merger was measured using the income approach, which took into account the future cash flows that a market participant would expect to receive from holding the liability as an asset. The carrying amount of the variable rate borrowings under the secured debt facilities at the time of the Merger approximated the fair value estimated based on then current market rates and an appropriate credit spread. The credit spread was estimated as the margin over LIBOR in Diamond S’ then recently entered secured debt facilities, which varied from 2.5% to 3.25%, and represented INSW management’s best estimate of such credit spreads. All unamortized deferred financing costs associated with existing financing arrangements of Diamond S were eliminated as part of the fair value measurement. In connection with the Merger, the Company acquired 51% of the net assets of two joint venture entities which were determined to be variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which the Company was considered the primary beneficiary. According to ASC 805, a primary beneficiary’s initial consolidation of a VIE whose assets and liabilities do not constitute a business is excluded from the scope of business combination. Accordingly, the Company applied ASC 810, Consolidation, for initial measurement and recognition of the net assets of the two joint ventures upon initial consolidation. The net assets of the VIEs were measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 805. Merger and integration related costs represent transactions that were separate from the acquisition of assets and assumption of liabilities in the Merger and were comprised of the following: (Dollars in thousands) CSMC termination fee, noncash Accelerated vesting triggered by involuntary termination Severance Technical manager transition costs Other integration costs Merger and integration related costs $ $ 2021 31,053 5,530 7,101 4,582 2,474 50,740 As discussed above, the CSMC termination fee is accounted for separately from the asset acquisition, as part of the consideration transferred, that is not related to the fair value of the acquired net assets. On July 16, 2021, the Company recognized non-cash stock compensation cost of $5.3 million related to the accelerated vesting of 600,816 outstanding Diamond S restricted stock and restricted stock units awards upon change of control and involuntary termination as the involuntary termination trigger was initiated by INSW. In addition, the Company recognized stock compensation of $0.2 million in relation to the accelerated vesting of INSW restricted stock awards that vested on December 31, 2021, due to a post-merger reduction in force. The Company incurred severance costs for the former executives and certain employees of Diamond S totaling $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2021. Approximately $1.0 million in severance costs incurred in relation to the December 31, 2021 post-Merger reduction in force was accrued and included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 and paid out during the year ended December 31, 2022. NOTE 3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: 1. Cash and cash equivalents — Interest-bearing deposits that are highly liquid investments and have a maturity of three months or less when purchased are included in cash and cash equivalents. Restricted cash was nil as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. 2. Short-term investments — Short-term investments consist of time deposits with original maturities of between 91 and 364 days. 3. Concentration of credit risk — The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk principally from cash and cash equivalents and voyage receivables due from charterers and pools in which the Company participates. The Company manages its credit risk exposure through assessment of the creditworthiness of its counterparties. Cash equivalents consist primarily of time deposits, and money market funds. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents in what we believe to be credit-worthy financial institutions. The Company’s money market funds are carried at fair market value. Voyage receivables consist of (i) operating lease receivables associated with revenues from leases accounted for under ASC 842, Leases (ASC 842), which are primarily accrued earnings due from pools; and (ii) billed and unbilled non-operating lease receivables associated with revenues from services accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), which are due within one year. The 78 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Company performs ongoing evaluations to determine customer credit and limits the amount of credit extended to customers. The Company maintains allowances for estimated credit losses and these losses have generally been within its expectations. With respect to non-operating lease receivables, the Company recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses in accordance with ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit losses (ASC 326), based on troubled accounts, historical experience, other currently available evidence, and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future. The Company makes significant judgements and assumptions to estimate its expected losses. The Company makes judgments about the creditworthiness of customers based on ongoing credit evaluations including analysis of the counterparty’s established credit rating or assessment of the counterparty’s creditworthiness based on our analysis of their financial statements when a credit rating is not available, country and political risk of the counterparty, and their business strategy. The Company manages its non- operating lease receivable portfolios using delinquency as a key credit quality indicator. The Company performs the following steps in estimating expected losses: (i) gather historical losses over five years; (ii) assume outstanding billed amounts over 180 days as additional expected losses; and (iii) make forward-looking adjustments to the expected losses to reflect future economic conditions by comparing credit default swap rates of significant customers over time. In addition, the Company performs individual assessments for customers that do not share risk characteristics with other customers (for example a customer under bankruptcy or a customer with known disputes or collectability issues). The allowance for credit losses reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in the voyage receivables balance and is recognized as an allowance or contra-asset to the voyage receivables balance. Provisions for credit losses associated with voyage receivables are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. The movement in the allowance for credit losses during the three years ended December 31, 2023 is summarized as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Balance at January 1, 2021 Reversal of expected credit losses Write-offs charged against the allowance Balance at December 31,2021 Provision for expected credit losses Balance at December 31,2022 Reversal of expected credit losses Balance at December 31,2023 Allowance for Credit Losses - Voyage Receivables 55 (21) (3) 31 230 261 (70) 191 $ $ During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company did not have any individual customers who accounted for 10% or more of its revenues apart from the pools in which it participates. The pools in which the Company participates accounted in aggregate for 95% and 96% of consolidated voyage receivables at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. 4. Inventories — Inventories, which consist principally of fuel, are stated at cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. 5. Vessels, vessel lives, deferred drydocking expenditures and other property — Vessels are recorded at cost and are depreciated to their estimated salvage value on the straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which is generally 25 years. Each vessel’s salvage value is equal to the product of its lightweight tonnage and an estimated steel recycling price of $300 per ton. The carrying value of each of the Company’s vessels represents its original cost at the time it was delivered or purchased less depreciation calculated using estimated useful lives from the date such vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard. A vessel’s carrying value is reduced to its new cost basis (i.e., its current fair value) if a vessel impairment charge is recorded. Interest costs are capitalized to construction in progress during the construction period of a vessel and represent the amount which theoretically could have been avoided had the Company not made installment payments on the vessel under construction. Interest capitalized aggregated $2.4 million, $4.3 million, and $0.6 million in 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively (See Note 6, “Vessels, Deferred Drydock and Other Property). Other property, including leasehold improvements, are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the terms of the leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years. 79 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Expenditures incurred during a drydocking are deferred and amortized on the straight-line basis over the period until the next scheduled drydocking, which is generally two and a half to five years. The Company only includes in deferred drydocking costs those direct costs that are incurred as part of the drydocking to meet regulatory requirements or are expenditures that add economic life to the vessel, increase the vessel’s earnings capacity or improve the vessel’s efficiency. Direct costs include shipyard costs as well as the costs of placing the vessel in the shipyard. Expenditures for normal maintenance and repairs, whether incurred as part of the drydocking or not, are expensed as incurred. 6. Impairment of long-lived assets — The carrying amounts of long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition is less than the asset’s carrying amount. This assessment is made at the individual vessel level since separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available. The impairment charge, if any, would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a vessel exceeded its fair value. If using an income approach in determining the fair value of a vessel, the Company will consider the discounted cash flows resulting from the highest and best use of the vessel asset from a market-participant’s perspective. Alternatively, if using a market approach, the Company will obtain third-party appraisals of the estimated fair value of the vessel. A long-lived asset impairment charge results in a new cost basis being established for the relevant long-lived asset. See Note 6, “Vessels, Deferred Drydock and Other Property,” for further discussion on the impairment tests performed on certain of our vessels during the three years ended December 31, 2023. 7. Deferred finance charges — Finance charges, excluding original issue discount, incurred in the arrangement and/or amendments resulting in the modification of debt are deferred and amortized to interest expense on either an effective interest method or straight-line basis over the life of the related debt. Unamortized deferred finance charges of $4.5 million relating to the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan and the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2023, and $6.9 million relating to the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan and BoComm Lease Financing (See Note 10, “Debt”) as of December 31, 2022, respectively, are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Unamortized deferred financing charges of $11.3 million and $13.4 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, relating to the Company’s outstanding debt facilities, are included in long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. Interest expense relating to the amortization of deferred financing costs amounted to $4.7 million in 2023, $4.9 million in 2022 and $2.2 million in 2021. 8. Revenue and expense recognition — The Company’s contract revenues consist of revenues from time charters, bareboat charters, voyage charters and pool revenues. The majority of the Company's contracts for pool revenues, time and bareboat charter revenues, and voyage charter revenues are accounted for as lease revenue under ASC 842. Lightering services provided by the Company's Crude Tanker Lightering Business and voyage charter contracts that do not meet the definition of a lease are accounted for as service revenues under ASC 606. Under ASC 842, lease revenue for fixed lease payments is recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis and lease revenue for variable lease payments (e.g., demurrage, pool earnings) are recognized in the period in which the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. Initial direct costs are expensed over the lease term on the same basis as lease revenue. The Company has elected the lessor practical expedient to aggregate non-lease components with the associated lease components and to account for the combined components as required by the practical expedient since its primary revenue streams described above meet the conditions required to adopt the practical expedient. Furthermore, the Company has performed a qualitative analysis of each of its primary revenue contract types to determine whether the lease component or the non-lease component is the predominant component of the contract. The Company concluded that the lease component is the predominant component for all of its primary revenue contract types, as the lessee would ascribe more value to the control and use of the underlying vessel rather than to the technical services to operate the vessel which is an add-on service to the lessee. Revenues from time charters are accounted for as fixed rate operating leases with an embedded technical management service component and are recognized ratably over the rental periods of such charters. Bareboat charters are also accounted for as fixed rate operating leases and the associated revenue is recognized ratably over the rental periods of such charters. 80 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Voyage charters contain a lease component if the contract (i) specifies a specific vessel asset; and (ii) has terms that allow the charterer to exercise substantive decision-making rights, which have an economic value to the charterer and therefore allow the charterer to direct how and for what purpose the vessel is used. Voyage charter revenues and expenses are recognized ratably over the estimated length of each voyage. For a voyage charter which contains a lease component, revenue and expenses are recognized based on a lease commencement-to-discharge basis and the lease commencement date is the latter of discharge of the previous cargo or voyage charter contract signing. For voyage charters that do not have a lease component, revenue and expenses are recognized based on a load-to-discharge basis. Accordingly, voyage expenses incurred during a vessel’s positioning voyage to a load port in order to serve a customer under a voyage charter not containing a lease are considered costs to fulfill a contract and are deferred and recognized ratably over the load-to-discharge portion of the contract. Under voyage charters, expenses such as fuel, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling operations and brokerage commissions are paid by the Company whereas, under time and bareboat charters, such voyage costs are paid by the Company’s customers. For the Company’s vessels operating in pools, revenues and voyage expenses are pooled and allocated to each pool’s participants on a time charter equivalent (“TCE”) basis in accordance with an agreed-upon formula. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its agreements with commercial pools as variable rate operating leases. For the pools in which the Company participates, management monitors, among other things, the relative proportion of the Company’s vessels operating in each of the pools to the total number of vessels in each of the respective pools and assesses whether or not the Company’s participation interest in each of the pools is sufficiently significant so as to determine that the Company has effective control of the pool. Demurrage earned during a voyage charter represents variable consideration. The Company estimates demurrage at contract inception using either the expected value or most likely amount approaches. Such estimate is reviewed and updated over the term of the voyage charter contract. The Company recognizes revenues from services in accordance with the provisions of ASC 606. The standard provides a unified model to determine how revenue is recognized. In doing so, the Company makes judgments including identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to each performance obligation. Revenues are recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under its agreements, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation. As the Company’s performance obligations are services which are received and consumed by its customers as it performs such services, revenues are recognized over time proportionate to the days elapsed since the service commencement compared to the total days anticipated to complete the service. The minimum duration of services is less than one year for each of the Company’s current contracts. 9. Leases — The Company currently has two major categories of lease contracts under which the Company is a lessee – chartered-in vessels and leased office and other space. Chartered-in vessels include bareboat charters which have a lease component only and time charters which have both lease and non-lease components. The lease component relates to the cost to a lessee to control the use of the vessel and the non-lease components relate to the cost to the lessee for the lessor to operate the vessel (technical management service components). For time charters-in, the Company has separated non-lease components from lease component and scoped out non-lease components from the application of ASC 842. For leased office and other space, the Company has elected the ASC 842 practical expedient to account for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component as it is not practical to separate the insignificant non-lease components from the associated lease components for these types of leases. Further, the Company has elected as an accounting policy not to apply ASC 842 to its portfolio of short-term leases (i.e., leases with an original term of 12-months or less). Instead, the lease payments are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. (see Note 16, “Leases,” for additional information with respect to the Company’s short-term leases). 81 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, current portion of operating lease liabilities, and long-term operating lease liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company has disclosed the finance leases right-of-use assets and current portion of finance lease liabilities separately in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any prepaid lease payments made and excludes accrued lease payments and lease incentives. Our lease terms take into consideration options to extend or terminate the lease or purchase the underlying asset when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The Company makes significant judgements and assumptions to estimate its incremental borrowing rate that a lessee would have to pay to borrow on a 100% collateralized basis over a term similar to the lease term and in an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. The Company performs the following steps in estimating its incremental borrowing rate: (i) gather observable debt yields of the Company’s recently issued debt facilities; and (ii) make adjustments to the yields of the actual debt facilities to reflect changes in collateral level, terms, the risk-free interest rate, and credit ratings. In addition, the Company performs sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of changes in the selected discount rates on the estimated lease liability. The Company makes significant judgements and assumptions to separate the lease component from the non-lease component of its time chartered-in vessels. For purposes of determining the standalone selling price of the vessel lease and technical management service components of the Company’s time charters, the Company concluded that the residual approach would be the most appropriate method to use given that vessel lease rates are highly variable depending on shipping market conditions, the duration of such charters, and the age of the vessel. The Company believes that the standalone transaction price attributable to the technical management service component is more readily determinable than the price of the lease component and, accordingly, the price of the service component is estimated using observable data (such as fees charged by third-party technical managers) and the residual transaction price is attributed to the vessel lease component. The Company is party to a number of sale and leaseback transactions in which certain of our vessels were sold to third parties and then leased back under bareboat charter-in arrangements. For each arrangement, we evaluated whether, in substance, these transactions were leases or a form of financing. We have concluded that each arrangement was a form of financing on the basis that each transaction was a sale and leaseback transaction that did not meet the criteria for a sale under ASC 842. Accordingly, such arrangement was recorded at amortized costs using the effective interest method, with the corresponding vessels remaining on the balance sheet at cost, less accumulated depreciation. 10. Derivatives — ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Derivatives that are not effective hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is an effective hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, a change in the fair value of the derivative is either recorded to current earnings (fair value hedge), or recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedge transaction affects earnings (cash flow hedge). The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. When it is determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a hedge, the Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively, as discussed below. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (1) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item such as forecasted transactions; (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; or (4) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate or desired. 82 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents When the Company discontinues hedge accounting because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss and is reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gains and losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive loss will be recognized immediately in earnings. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, the Company will carry the derivative at its fair value on the consolidated balance sheets, recognizing changes in the fair value in current-period earnings, unless it is designated in a new hedging relationship. Any gain or loss realized upon the early termination of an interest rate cap, collar or swaps is recognized as an adjustment of interest expense over the shorter of the remaining term of the derivative instruments or the hedged debt. See Note 9, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Fair Value Disclosures,” for additional disclosures on the Company’s interest rate cap, collar and swaps and other financial instruments. 11. Fair value measurements — The Company accounts for certain assets and liabilities at fair value under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (ASC 820). ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, essentially an exit price. In addition, the fair value of assets and liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk, which for the liabilities described below includes the Company's own credit risk. The hierarchy below lists three levels of fair value based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market: Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 non-derivative assets and liabilities primarily include cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are observable in the market (where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves, credit spreads, etc.). Our Level 2 non-derivative liabilities primarily include the Company’s other outstanding debt facilities. Our Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities primarily include our interest rate swaps. Level 3 - Inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions). 12. Income taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Net deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such a determination, all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, an adjustment would be made to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes in the period such determination is made. Uncertain tax positions are recorded in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) the Company first determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. 13. Variable Interest Entities — The Company determines at the inception of each arrangement whether an entity in which we have made an investment or in which we have other variable interests is considered a variable interest entity (“VIE”). We consolidate a VIE when we are the primary beneficiary, i.e., when we have the power to direct activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE and have the obligation to absorb the majority of its losses or benefits. If we are not the 83 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents primary beneficiary, we account for the investment or other variable interests in a VIE in accordance with applicable generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. We assess whether any changes in our interest or relationship with the entity have occurred that may affect our determination of whether the entity is a VIE and, if so, whether we are or remain the primary beneficiary. See Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for additional information. 14. Use of estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates relate to the depreciation of vessels and other property, amortization of drydocking costs, judgments involved in identifying performance obligations in revenue contracts, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to each performance obligation, estimates used in assessing the recoverability of equity method investments and other long-lived assets, liabilities incurred relating to pension benefits, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 15. Recently issued accounting standards — The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification is the sole source of authoritative GAAP other than United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued rules and regulations that apply only to SEC registrants. The FASB issues Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) to communicate changes to the codification. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not referenced below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are not expected to have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. This guidance is expected to improve financial reporting by providing additional information about a public company’s significant segment expenses and more timely and detailed segment information reporting throughout the fiscal year. This guidance requires annual and interim period disclosure of significant segment expenses that are provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) as well as interim disclosures for all reportable segments’ profit or loss. It also requires disclosure of the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measures of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. The amendments in ASU 2023-07 are effective for all public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 and will apply retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on the disclosures to our consolidated financial statements. NOTE 4 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing earnings, after the deduction of dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share assumes the issuance of common stock for all potentially dilutive stock options and restricted stock units not classified as participating securities. Participating securities are defined by ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, as unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. There were 36,078, 64,882 and 84,849 weighted average shares of unvested restricted common stock shares considered to be participating securities for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Such participating securities are allocated a portion of income, but not losses under the two-class method. As of December 31, 2023, there were 414,056 shares of restricted stock units and 239,596 stock options outstanding considered to be potentially dilutive securities. Reconciliations of the numerator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Net income/(loss) allocated to: Common Stockholders Participating securities 84 International Seaways, Inc. 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 556,043 403 556,446 $ $ 387,401 490 387,891 $ $ (133,645) 153 (133,492) Table of Contents There were 450,515 and 463,445 dilutive equity awards outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. There were no dilutive equity awards outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2021. Awards of 40,504, 86,524 and 1,046,088 for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because inclusion of these awards would be anti-dilutive. NOTE 5 — BUSINESS AND SEGMENT REPORTING: The Company is engaged primarily in the ocean transportation of crude oil and petroleum products in the international market through the ownership and operation of a diversified fleet of vessels. The shipping industry has many distinct market segments based, in large part, on the size and design configuration of vessels required and, in some cases, on the flag of registry. Rates in each market segment are determined by a variety of factors affecting the supply and demand for vessels to move cargoes in the trades for which they are suited. Tankers are not bound to specific ports or schedules and therefore can respond to market opportunities by moving between trades and geographical areas. The Company charters its vessels to commercial shippers and foreign governments and governmental agencies primarily on voyage charters and on time charters. The Company has two reportable segments: Crude Tankers and Product Carriers. The joint ventures with two floating storage and offloading service vessels, which were sold in June 2022, were included in the Crude Tankers Segment. Adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations for segment reporting is defined as income/(loss) from vessel operations before general and administrative expenses, third-party debt modification fees, merger and integration related costs and (gain)/loss on disposal of vessels and other property, net of impairments. The accounting policies followed by the reportable segments are the same as those followed in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 85 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Information about the Company’s reportable segments as of and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2023 follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2023 Shipping revenues Time charter equivalent revenues Depreciation and amortization Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets Adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations Adjusted total assets at December 31, 2023 Expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements Payments for drydocking 2022 Shipping revenues Time charter equivalent revenues Depreciation and amortization Loss/(gain) on disposal of vessels and other assets, net of impairments Adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations Equity in income of affiliated companies Adjusted total assets at December 31, 2022 Expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements Payments for drydocking 2021 Shipping revenues Time charter equivalent revenues Depreciation and amortization Loss/(gain) on disposal of vessels and other property, net of impairments Adjusted loss from vessel operations Equity in income of affiliated companies Investments in and advances to affiliated companies at December 31, 2021 Adjusted total assets at December 31, 2021 Expenditures for vessels and vessel improvements Payments for drydocking Crude Tankers Product Carriers Other Totals $ $ $ 524,006 $ 512,220 76,877 (12) 307,764 1,523,713 184,467 5,659 331,699 $ 321,857 62,596 1,091 145,037 714 1,428,846 85,567 25,963 156,276 $ 144,286 57,870 2,032 (25,671) 21,838 157,370 1,453,427 62,209 23,394 547,769 $ 543,299 52,160 (35,922) 319,775 785,778 20,692 28,880 532,966 $ 531,853 47,706 (20,738) 325,565 — 833,798 30,409 17,364 116,270 $ 111,574 28,739 (10,602) (12,069) — 22,961 780,818 15,826 19,022 — $ — 1 — (1) — — — — $ — 86 — (86) — — — — — $ — 65 (1,183) (65) — — — — — 1,071,775 1,055,519 129,038 (35,934) 627,538 2,309,491 205,159 34,539 864,665 853,710 110,388 (19,647) 470,516 714 2,262,644 115,976 43,327 272,546 255,860 86,674 (9,753) (37,805) 21,838 180,331 2,234,245 78,035 42,416 Reconciliations of time charter equivalent revenues of the segments to shipping revenues as reported in the consolidated statements of operations follow: (Dollars in thousands) Time charter equivalent revenues Add: Voyage expenses Shipping revenues $ $ 2023 1,055,519 16,256 1,071,775 $ $ 2022 2021 853,710 10,955 864,665 $ $ 255,860 16,686 272,546 Consistent with general practice in the shipping industry, the Company uses time charter equivalent revenues, which represents shipping revenues less voyage expenses, as a measure to compare revenue generated from a voyage charter to revenue generated from a time charter. Time charter equivalent revenues, a non-GAAP measure, provides additional meaningful information in conjunction with shipping revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, because it assists Company management in making decisions regarding the deployment and use of its vessels and in evaluating their financial performance. 86 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Reconciliations of adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations of the segments to income/(loss) before income taxes, as reported in the consolidated statements of operations follow: (Dollars in thousands) Total adjusted income/(loss) from vessel operations of all segments General and administrative expenses Third-party debt modification fees Merger and integration related costs Gain on disposal of vessels and other assets, net of impairments Consolidated income/(loss) from vessel operations Equity in results of affiliated companies Other income/(expense) Interest expense Income/(loss) before income taxes 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 627,538 (47,473) (568) — 35,934 615,431 — 10,652 (65,759) 560,324 $ $ 470,516 (46,351) (1,158) — 19,647 442,654 714 2,332 (57,721) 387,979 $ $ (37,805) (33,235) (110) (50,740) 9,753 (112,137) 21,838 (5,947) (36,796) (133,042) Reconciliations of adjusted total assets of the segments to amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets follow: (Dollars in thousands) Adjusted total assets of all segments Corporate unrestricted cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments Other unallocated amounts Consolidated total assets December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 $ $ 2,309,491 126,760 60,000 25,568 2,521,819 $ $ 2,262,644 243,744 80,000 28,946 2,615,334 Certain additional information about the Company’s operations for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2023 follows: (Dollars in thousands) Total vessels, deferred drydock and other property at December 31, 2023 Total vessels, deferred drydock and other property at December 31, 2022 Total vessels, deferred drydock and other property at December 31, 2021 NOTE 6 — VESSELS, DEFERRED DRYDOCK AND OTHER PROPERTY: Vessels and other property consist of the following: Crude Tankers Product Carriers $ 1,420,750 $ 1,265,019 1,230,717 575,642 $ 604,114 676,990 Other Consolidated 584 $ 428 187 1,996,976 1,869,561 1,907,894 (Dollars in thousands) Vessels, at cost Accumulated depreciation Vessels, net Other property, at cost Accumulated depreciation and amortization Other property, net Total vessels and other property Construction in Progress 87 International Seaways, Inc. $ December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 $ 2,333,066 (422,276) 1,910,790 8,634 (4,998) 3,636 1,914,426 11,670 2,004,420 (327,321) 1,677,099 7,493 (4,582) 2,911 1,680,010 123,940 Table of Contents The aggregate carrying value of the 42 owned and chartered-in vessels pledged as collateral under the Company’s debt and lease financing facilities (see Note 10, “Debt”) was $1,520.0 million as of December 31, 2023. A breakdown of the carrying value of the Company’s owned and chartered-in vessels by reportable segment and fleet as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 follows: As of December 31, 2023 (Dollars in thousands) Crude Tankers VLCC Suezmax Aframax Total Crude Tankers Product Carriers LR2 LR1 MR Total Product Carriers Fleet Total Cost Accumulated Depreciation Net Carrying Value Average Vessel Age (by dwt) Number of Owned Vessels $ $ 1,128,971 451,248 108,910 1,689,129 (232,992) $ (61,173) (12,811) (306,976) 895,979 390,075 96,099 1,382,153 (1) 74,964 116,784 452,189 643,937 (25,533) (26,840) (62,927) (115,300) 49,431 89,944 389,262 528,637 $ 2,333,066 $ (422,276) $ 1,910,790 7.8 9.8 11.8 8.7 9.4 14.6 14.3 14.1 10.1 (1) Includes one VLCC with a carrying value of $65.7 million, which the Company believes exceeds its market value of approximately $62.9 million by $2.8 million. As of December 31, 2022 (Dollars in thousands) Crude Tankers VLCC Suezmax Aframax Total Crude Tankers Product Carriers LR2 LR1 MR Total Product Carriers Fleet Total 88 International Seaways, Inc. Cost Accumulated Depreciation Net Carrying Value Average Vessel Age (by dwt) Number of Owned Vessels $ $ 825,570 449,663 64,492 1,339,725 (194,048) $ (42,459) (7,319) (243,826) 74,830 116,784 473,081 664,695 (22,828) (20,550) (40,117) (83,495) 631,522 407,204 57,173 1,095,899 52,002 96,234 432,964 581,200 $ 2,004,420 $ (327,321) $ 1,677,099 8.8 8.8 7.7 8.8 8.4 13.6 13.4 13.2 10.2 13 13 4 30 1 6 35 42 72 10 13 2 25 1 6 38 45 70 Table of Contents Vessel activity for the three years ended December 31, 2023 is summarized as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Balance at January 1, 2021 Purchases and vessel additions Disposals Depreciation Impairment Balance at December 31, 2021 Purchases and vessel additions Disposals Depreciation Impairment Balance at December 31, 2022 Purchases and vessel additions Disposals Depreciation Impairment Balance at December 31, 2023 Vessel Cost Accumulated Depreciation Net Book Value $ $ 1,287,688 962,609 (199,793) — (5,990) 2,044,514 41,499 (76,881) — (4,712) 2,004,420 360,822 (32,176) — — 2,333,066 (182,148) $ 1,105,540 — 6,539 (71,506) 2,493 (244,622) — 4,033 (89,747) 3,015 (327,321) — 3,904 (98,859) — 1,799,892 1,677,099 $ (422,276) $ 1,910,790 The total of purchases and vessel additions will differ from expenditures for vessels as shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows because of the timing of when payments were made. Vessel Impairments The Company gave consideration as to whether events or changes in circumstances had occurred since December 31, 2022, that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessels in the Company’s fleet may not be recoverable. The Company determined that no held-for-use or held-for-sale impairment indicators existed for the Company’s vessels during the year ended December 31, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company gave consideration on a quarterly basis as to whether events or changes in circumstances had occurred since December 31, 2021, that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessels in the Company’s fleet may not be recoverable. During the quarter ended March 31, 2022, the Company concluded that the contracted sales of one 2004-built Panamax and two 2006-built Handysize product carriers resulted in the recognition of held-for-sale impairment charges aggregating $1.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company gave consideration on a quarterly basis as to whether events or changes in circumstances had occurred since December 31, 2020 that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the vessels in the Company’s fleet may not be recoverable. During the quarter ended June 30, 2021, the Company concluded that the contracted sale of one 2003-built Panamax resulted in a held-for-sale impairment. Held-for-sale impairment charges aggregating $3.5 million were recorded during the second quarter of 2021 including a charge of $3.4 million to write the value of the vessel down to its estimated fair value at June 30, 2021, and a charge of $0.1 million for estimated costs to sell the vessel. Vessel Acquisitions and Construction Commitments In January 2022, the Company entered into memoranda of agreements for the sale of a 2010-built MR for a sale price of $16.5 million and the purchase of a 2011-built LR1 for a purchase price of $19.5 million with the same counterparty. The LR1 was delivered into our niche commercial pool, Panamax International. The Company closed both transactions during the first quarter of 2022, recognizing a gain of $4.5 million on the sale of the 2010-built MR and a net cash outflow of $3.0 million representing the difference in value between the two vessels. On December 6, 2022, the Company gave notice of its intent to exercise its options to purchase two 2009-built Aframaxes that it had been bareboat chartering-in. The aggregate purchase price for the two vessels was $43.0 million. On March 30, 2023 and April 4, 2023, the Company completed the purchase of the two Aframaxes. 89 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The Company’s three newbuild dual-fuel LNG VLCCs were delivered to the Company on March 7, 2023, April 11, 2023, and May 24, 2023, respectively. All three vessels commenced employment under seven-year time charter contracts with an oil major shortly after delivery. During the third and fourth quarters of 2023, the Company entered into agreements to construct four dual-fuel ready LNG 73,600 dwt LR1 Product Carriers at K Shipbuilding Co., Ltd’s shipyard, subject to certain conditions customary to similar transactions. The four vessels are scheduled for delivery between the second half of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026. The total construction cost for the vessels will be approximately $231 million, which will be paid for through a combination of long-term financing and available liquidity. On November 24, 2023, the Company entered into an option agreement for the construction of two additional dual-fuel ready LNG 73,600 dwt LR1 Product Carriers at the same shipyard for delivery during the third quarter of 2026 at an additional cost of approximately $116 million. Under the terms of the agreement, as amended, the Company’s option will expire on March 31, 2024. On February 23, 2024, the Company entered into agreements to acquire two 2014-built and four 2015-built MR Product Carriers for an aggregate consideration of approximately $232 million, payable 85% in cash and 15% in shares of common stock of the Company. Each of the six vessel purchases is subject to satisfaction of closing conditions customary for vessel purchases and the vessels are expected to be delivered to the Company between March and May 2024. Disposal/Sales of Vessel and Other Property During 2023, the Company recognized a net aggregate gain of $36.1 million on disposal of three 2008-built MRs. During 2022, the Company recognized a net aggregate gain of $18.0 million on disposal of two 2008-built MRs, one 2002-built Panamax, one 2004-built Panamax and its remaining four 2006-built Handysize product carriers. During 2021, the Company recognized a net aggregate gain of $12.8 million on disposal of a 2002-built VLCC, four 2002-built Panamaxes, a 2003-built Panamax, a 2006-built Suezmax, a 2007-built Handysize product carrier, a 2006-built Handysize product carrier, and seven MRs, which were built between 2006 and 2009. See Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities,” for a description of the distribution of a 2016-built Suezmax in which the Company had a 51% interest to its joint venture partner in connection with the dissolution of the joint venture. Drydocking activity for the three years ended December 31, 2023 is summarized as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Balance at January 1 Additions Sub-total Drydock amortization Amount charged to gain or loss on disposal of vessels Balance at December 31 $ $ 2023 2022 2021 65,611 35,117 100,728 (28,787) (1,061) 70,880 $ $ 55,753 35,988 91,741 (19,809) (6,321) 65,611 $ $ 36,334 40,823 77,157 (14,566) (6,838) 55,753 The total additions above will differ from payments for drydocking as shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows because of the timing of when payments were made. NOTE 7 — EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS: Pursuant to a share purchase agreement, on June 7, 2022, the Company sold its 50% ownership interest in two joint ventures - TI Africa Limited (“TI Africa”) and TI Asia Limited (“TI Asia”), which operated two Floating Storage and Offloading Service vessels that were converted from two ULCCs (collectively the “FSO Joint Venture”), to its joint venture partner Euronav NV. The Company received, net of adjustments for working capital and expenses, approximately $140 million in cash from the sale. The Company recorded a loss on the sale of $9.5 million and reclassified the Company’s share of the unrealized losses associated with the interest rate swaps held by the FSO Joint Venture at the time of the sale of $0.1 million into earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss). 90 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The share purchase agreement contains specified representations, warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions of the parties customary for transactions of this type. NOTE 8 —VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (“VIEs”): Commercial pools in which the Company participates operate a large number of vessels as an integrated transportation system, which offer customers greater flexibility and a higher level of service while achieving scheduling efficiencies. Participants in the commercial pools contribute one or more vessels and generally provide an initial contribution towards the working capital of the pools at the time they enter their vessels. The pools finance their operations primarily through the earnings that they generate. From time to time, INSW enters into joint ventures to take advantage of commercial opportunities. In each joint venture, INSW has the same relative rights and obligations and financial risks and rewards as its partners. INSW evaluated all of its pooling and joint venture arrangements to determine if they were variable interest entities (“VIEs”). INSW determined that each pool and each joint venture met the criteria of a VIE and, therefore, INSW reviewed its participation in these VIEs to determine if it was the primary beneficiary of any of them. INSW reviewed the legal documents that govern the creation and management of the VIEs and also analyzed its involvement to determine if INSW was a primary beneficiary in any of these VIEs. A VIE for which INSW is determined to be the primary beneficiary is required to be consolidated in its financial statements. Consolidated VIEs In connection with the Merger, the Company acquired 51% of the net assets of two joint ventures - Diamond Anglo Ship Management Pte. Ltd. (“DASM”) and NT Suez Holdco LLC (“NT Suez”). Diamond Anglo Ship Management Pte. Ltd. — DASM was formed in January 2018 by Diamond S and Anglo Eastern Investment Holdings Ltd. (“AE Holdings”), a third- party, to provide ship management services to some of Diamond S’ vessels. On July 1, 2022, the Company and AE Holding terminated their joint venture agreement, which resulted in the Company selling its 51% interest in DASM to AE Holdings. The Company received $0.8 million in cash for the sale of its interest, after certain deductions, and recognized a $0.1 million gain on the sale of the joint venture, which is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. Prior to July 1, 2022, DASM was owned 51% by the Company and 49% by AE Holdings. AE Holdings did not participate in the income or equity of DASM, and the Company was considered to be the primary beneficiary of DASM as the Company had the ability to direct the activities that most significantly impacted DASM’s economic performance. The results of operations of DASM were included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations through June 30, 2022. NT Suez Holdco LLC — The NT Suez joint venture was formed in September 2014 to purchase two Suezmax newbuildings. The two vessels were delivered in October and November 2016. NT Suez was owned 51% by the Company and 49% by WLR/TRF Shipping S.a.r.l (“WLR/TRF”). The results attributable to the 49% interest in NT Suez held by WLR/ TRF were included in net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021. On November 12, 2021, the Company and WLR/TRF competed the dissolution of the NT Suez joint venture and repaid all outstanding amounts under the $66 Million Credit Facility previously entered into by NT Suez for the purpose of financing the two Suezmax tankers controlled by NT Suez (See Note 10, “Debt”). The dissolution resulted in the distribution of one Suezmax tanker to each partner through a transfer of the shares of the two vessel-owning subsidiaries of NT Suez. In connection with the dissolution of the joint venture, NT Suez made a cash distribution of $5.3 million to WLR/TRF. Supplemental cash flow information for the year 91 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ended December 31, 2021 associated with the derecognition of assets, liabilities, and corresponding noncontrolling interest related to NT Suez were non-cash investing activities as follows: Derecognition of noncontrolling interest (dollars in thousands): Voyage receivables Other receivables Inventories Prepaid expenses and other current assets Vessels Deferred drydock expenditures, net Time charter contracts acquired, net Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities Current installments of long-term debt Noncontrolling interest Unconsolidated VIEs $ $ 203 91 219 2 45,791 1,812 1,076 (3,628) (22,106) (23,460) — The formation agreements for the commercial pools state that the board of the pool has decision making power over their significant decisions. In addition, all such decisions must be approved unanimously by the board. Since INSW shares power to make all significant economic decisions that affect the pools and does not control a majority of the board, INSW is not considered a primary beneficiary of the pools. The following table presents the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets related to the unconsolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2023 and 2022: (Dollars in thousands) Pool working capital deposits 2023 2022 $ 31,748 $ 35,593 In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company evaluated its maximum exposure to loss related to these VIEs by assuming a complete loss of the Company’s investment in these VIEs. The table below compares the Company’s liability in the consolidated balance sheet to the maximum exposure to loss at December 31, 2023: (Dollars in thousands) Other Liabilities Consolidated Balance Sheet Maximum Exposure to Loss $ — $ 31,748 In addition, as of December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $232.4 million of trade receivables due from the pools that were determined to be a VIE. These trade receivables, which are included in voyage receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, have been excluded from the above tables and the calculation of INSW’s maximum exposure to loss. The Company does not record the maximum exposure to loss as a liability because it does not believe that such a loss is probable of occurring as of December 31, 2023. 92 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES: The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, other than derivatives that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, at December 31, 2023 and 2022 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents Short-term investments(1) $750 Million Facility Term Loan(2) ING Credit Facility(2) Ocean Yield Lease Financing(2) BoComm Lease Financing(3) Toshin Lease Financing(3) Hyuga Lease Financing(3) COSCO Lease Financing(2) Kaiyo Lease Financing(3) Kaisha Lease Financing(3) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 Fair Value Level $ $ 126,760 60,000 (113,598) (20,833) (311,907) (210,186) (13,566) (13,643) — (12,419) (12,519) 243,744 80,000 (493,565) (22,917) (341,106) (63,598) (14,744) (14,853) (47,732) (13,797) (13,704) Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 (1) Short-term investments consist of time deposits with original maturities of between 91 and 180 days. (2) Floating rate debt – the fair value of floating rate debt has been determined using level 2 inputs and is considered to be equal to the carrying value since it bears a variable interest rate, which is reset every three months. (3) Fixed rate debt – the fair value of fixed rate debt has been determined using level 2 inputs by discounting the expected cash flows of the outstanding debt. Derivatives The Company uses interest rate caps, collars and swaps for the management of interest rate risk exposure associated with changes in LIBOR or SOFR interest rate payments due on its credit facilities. On June 2, 2022, the Company entered into amortizing interest rate swap agreements covering a notional amount of $475 million of the $750 Million Facility Term Loan with major financial institutions participating in such facility that effectively converts the Company’s interest rate exposure from a three-month SOFR floating rate to a fixed rate of 2.84% through the maturity date of February 22, 2027, effective August 22, 2022. The interest rate swap agreements, which contain no leverage features, are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The outstanding unamortized notional amount of these interest rates swaps was $337.9 million as of December 31, 2023 covering for accounting purposes the $113.6 million principal balance outstanding under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan and $224.3 million of the principal balance outstanding under the Ocean Yield Lease Financing. Terminated Derivatives In November 2021, in connection with the refinancing of the Sinosure Credit Facility (see Note 10, “Debt”), the Company terminated its amended interest rate swap agreement providing for a fixed-three month LIBOR rate of 2.5%, originally scheduled to expire on December 21, 2027, with a cash payment of $11.7 million. The amended interest rate swap agreement did not in its entirety meet the definition of a derivative instrument because of its off market fixed rate at inception and was deemed to be a hybrid instrument with a financing component and an embedded at-the-market derivative. Such embedded derivative was bifurcated and accounted for separately in the same manner as the Company’s other derivatives. The financing component was recorded in current and noncurrent other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at amortized cost. Due to an other-than-insignificant financing element on a portion of such hybrid instrument, the cash flows associated with this hybrid instrument were classified as financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Upon termination, a $4.2 million loss related to the extinguishment of the financing component of the hybrid instrument was recognized in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 and a $4.1 million loss associated with the embedded derivative component of the hybrid instrument remained in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) to be released into earnings as the forecasted interest accrual transactions either affect earnings or become not probable of occurring. Approximately $2.0 million, $2.2 million and $0.4 million of such losses were released to interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively and an additional $1.7 million is expected to amortize out of accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings within the next 12 months. 93 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents In May 2022, in connection with the refinancing of its $390 Million Facility Term Loan and $525 Million Facility Term Loan (see Note 10, “Debt”), the Company terminated all of its existing in-the-money LIBOR based interest swaps with an aggregate notional amount of approximately $358.6 million and received net cash proceeds of approximately $9.6 million. Upon termination, a $9.7 million gain associated with the swaps remained in accumulated other comprehensive income to be released into earnings as the forecasted interest accrual transactions either affect earnings or become not probable of occurring. Approximately $4.1 million and $3.0 million of this gain was amortized out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and an additional $2.5 million of the gain expected to amortize out of accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings within the next 12 months. Tabular disclosure of derivatives location Derivatives are recorded on a net basis by counterparty when a legal right of offset exists. The Company had the following amounts recorded on a net basis by transaction in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets related to the Company’s use of derivatives as of December 31, 2023 and 2022: Fair Values of Derivative Instruments: (Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2023: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps Total December 31,2022: Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps Total Current portion of derivative asset Long-term derivative assets Current portion of derivative liabilities Long-term derivative liabilities Other receivables $ $ $ $ 5,081 5,081 6,987 6,987 $ $ $ $ 1,153 1,153 4,662 4,662 $ $ $ $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 961 961 547 547 The following tables present information with respect to gains and losses on derivative positions reflected in the consolidated statements of operations or in the consolidated statements of other comprehensive income/(loss). 94 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The effect of cash flow hedging relationships recognized in other comprehensive income/(loss) excluding amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), including hedges of equity method investees, for the three years ended December 31, 2023 follows: (Dollars in thousands) Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps Other-than-insignificant financing element of derivatives: Interest rate swaps Total other comprehensive income 2023 2022 2021 3,187 $ 22,905 $ 9,404 — 3,187 $ — 22,905 $ (1,508) 7,896 $ $ The effect of cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations is presented excluding hedges of equity method investees. The effect of the Company’s cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statement of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2023 is shown below: (Dollars in thousands) Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Interest rate swaps Discontinued hedging instruments: Interest rate swap Other-than-insignificant financing element of derivatives: Interest rate swaps Total interest (income)/expense 2023 2022 2021 $ $ (8,601) $ (1,044) $ (2,149) (216) — (10,750) $ — (1,260) $ 4,752 379 5,245 10,376 See Note 14, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss),” for disclosures relating to the impact of derivative instruments on accumulated other comprehensive loss. Fair Value Hierarchy The following table presents the fair values, which are pre-tax, for assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (excluding investments in affiliated companies): (Dollars in thousands) Derivative Assets (interest rate swaps) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 $ 7,195 $ 12,196 Fair Value Level Level 2(1) (1) Fair values are derived using valuation models that utilize the income valuation approach. These valuation models take into account contract terms such as maturity, as well as other inputs such as interest rate yield curves and creditworthiness of the counterparty and the Company. NOTE 10 —DEBT: The Company is party to a number of sale and leaseback transactions. The Company’s obligations under these transactions are secured by, among other things, assignments of earnings and insurances and stock pledges and account charges in respect of the subject vessels. The arrangements also contain customary events of default, including cross-default provisions as well as subjective acceleration clauses under which the lessor could cancel the lease in the event of a material adverse change in the Company’s business. For each arrangement, the Company evaluated whether, in substance, these transactions are leases or merely a form of financing. As a result of this evaluation, we concluded that each agreement was a form of financing on the basis that each transaction was a sale and leaseback transaction that did not meet the criteria for a sale under ASC 842 and ASC 606 due to the fixed price seller repurchase options and/or mandatory seller repurchase obligations terms included in the arrangements. Accordingly, the cash received in the transactions has been accounted for as a liability, and such arrangements have been recorded at amortized cost using the 95 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents effective interest method, with the corresponding vessels remaining on the consolidated balance sheet at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The balances in the following table reflect the amounts due under the Company’s secured debt facilities and secured lease financing arrangements, net of any unamortized deferred financing fees or discounts/premiums: (Dollars in thousands) $750 Million Facility Term Loan, due 2027, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $3,124 and $6,400 ING Credit Facility, due 2026, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $295 and $416 Ocean Yield Lease Financing, due 2031, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $2,656 and $3,198 BoComm Lease Financing, due 2030, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $4,166 and $917 Toshin Lease Financing, due 2031, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $302 and $370 COSCO Lease Financing, due 2028, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $ - and $1,187 Hyuga Lease Financing, due 2031, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $265 and $323 Kaiyo Lease Financing, due 2030, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $227 and $285 Kaisha Lease Financing, due 2030, net of unamortized deferred finance costs of $238 and $298 Less current portion Long-term portion December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 110,474 20,538 309,250 229,583 13,903 — 13,786 12,518 12,624 722,676 (127,447) 595,229 $ $ 487,164 22,501 337,908 71,140 15,215 46,544 15,093 13,884 13,983 1,023,432 (162,854) 860,578 $ $ Capitalized terms used hereafter have the meaning given in these consolidated financial statements or in the respective transaction documents referred to below, including subsequent amendments thereto. $750 Million Credit Facility On May 20, 2022, International Seaways Operating Corporation (“ISOC”), the borrower, and certain of their subsidiaries entered into a credit agreement comprising $750 million of secured debt facilities (the “$750 Million Credit Facility”) with Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch (“Nordea”), Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (“CA-CIB”), BNP Paribas, DNB Markets Inc. and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (PUBL) (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners; Danish Ship Finance A/S and ING Bank N.V., London Branch (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers; and National Australia Bank Limited, as co-arranger. Nordea is acting as administrative agent, collateral agent and security trustee under the credit agreement, and CA-CIB is acting as sustainability coordinator. The $750 Million Credit Facility consists of (i) a five-year senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $530 million (the “$750 Million Facility Term Loan”), and (ii) a five-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million (the “$750 Million Facility Revolving Loan”) that amortizes or reduces in 19 quarterly installments, beginning on November 20, 2022. The $750 Million Credit Facility was secured by (i) a first lien on 55 of the Company’s vessels at the time of the closing of the facility, along with their earnings and insurances, and (ii) liens on certain additional assets of ISOC. The maturity date of the $750 Million Credit Facility is May 20, 2027, and is subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain events (as described in the credit agreement). The $750 Million Facility Term Loan contains an uncommitted accordion feature whereby, for a period of up to 24 months following the closing date, the amount of the loan thereunder may be increased up to an additional incremental $250 million (in increments of at least $10 million) for the acquisition of Additional Vessels, subject to certain conditions. On May 24, 2022, the available amount of $530 million under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan was drawn in full, and $70 million of the $220 million available under the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan was also drawn. The loan proceeds, together with available cash, were used to repay (i) the $163 million outstanding principal balance under the $390 Million Credit Facility; (ii) the 96 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents $284 million outstanding principal balance under the $525 Million Credit Agreement; and (iii) the $127.8 million outstanding principal balance under the $360 Million Credit Agreement; and to pay certain expenses related to the refinancing, including certain structuring and arrangement fees, legal and administrative fees totaling $10.5 million. Interest on the $750 Million Credit Facility is calculated based upon Adjusted Term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin. The Applicable Margin at the inception of the facility was 2.40%. The facilities also include a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism. The adjustment in pricing is linked to three factors: ● a Fleet Sustainability Score Target, reflecting the carbon efficiency of the INSW fleet as it relates to reductions in CO2 emissions year-over-year, such that it aligns with the International Maritime Organization’s 50% industry reduction target in GHG emissions by 2050, to be calculated in a manner consistent with the de-carbonization trajectory outlined in the Poseidon Principles (the global framework by which financial institutions can assess the climate alignment of their ship finance portfolios relative to established de-carbonization trajectories) ● a Sustainability-Linked Investment Target, reflecting targeted spending of $3 million per annum on investments in energy efficiency improvements, decarbonization, and other environmental, social and corporate governance-related initiatives; and ● a Lost Time Incident Frequency Target, reflecting performance against a Lost Time Incident Frequency average published by Intertanko. The Company is required to deliver annually, commencing in July 2023, a sustainability certificate for the preceding calendar year setting out the sustainability-related calculations required under the credit agreement. If the Company achieves all of the targets set out in the credit agreement, the Applicable Margin will be decreased by 0.05% per annum, while if the Company fails to achieve any of the targets set out in the credit agreement, the Applicable Margin will be increased by that same amount (but in no case will any such adjustment result in the Applicable Margin being increased or decreased from the otherwise-applicable Applicable Margin by more than 0.05% per annum in the aggregate). Based on the sustainability certificate submitted in July 2023, the Applicable Margin was increased by 0.05% to 2.45%. The $750 Million Credit Facility contains customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable to the Company, ISOC and the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries). The sale and delivery of a 2008-built MR, which was pledged under the $750 Million Credit Facility, on November 30, 2022, resulted in a mandatory principal prepayment of $5.8 million, reduced the number of vessels collateralizing the $750 Million Credit Facility to 54 vessels, reduced the availability under the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan to $217.4 million, and also resulted in a reduction in the scheduled future quarterly principal amortization from $30.6 million to $30.2 million. On March 10, 2023, the Company entered into an amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company (a) prepaid $97 million of outstanding principal under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan; (b) obtained a release of collateral vessel mortgages over 22 MR product carriers; (c) received from the lenders additional revolving credit commitments in an aggregate amount of $40 million, which additional commitments constitute an increase to, and are subject to the same terms and conditions as, the previously-existing revolving credit commitments; and (d) made certain other amendments to the credit agreement and ancillary documents, including amendments relating to certain hedging obligations related to the credit agreement and to repayment schedules. Following the effectiveness of the amendment, (a) the aggregate outstanding principal amount under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan was $366.3 million, (b) the aggregate principal commitments available under the $750 Million Facility Revolving Loan was $257.4 million (none of which was outstanding on December 31, 2023), and (c) the scheduled future quarterly principal amortization under the $750 Million Facility Term Loan decreased from $30.2 million to $27.7 million. Following the amendment to the $750 Million Credit Facility agreement and through December 31, 2023, the Company made an additional $181.3 million in mandatory principal prepayments on the $750 Million Facility Term Loan in conjunction with the sale of three 2008-built MRs, and the release of five Suezmaxes and one Aframax Tanker from the collateral package. These transactions resulted in a further reduction in the scheduled future quarterly principal amortization under the $750 Million Credit Facility Term Loan to $19.0 million as of December 31, 2023. $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility On September 27, 2023, the Company entered into a $160 million revolving credit agreement (the “$160 Million Revolving Credit Facility”) with Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch (“Nordea”), ING Bank N.V., London Branch (“ING”), Crédit Agricole 97 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Corporate & Investment Bank, and DNB Markets Inc. (or their respective affiliates), as mandated lead arrangers and bookrunners; and Danish Ship Finance A/S and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (PUBL) (or their respective affiliates), as lead arrangers. Nordea is acting as administrative agent, collateral agent, coordinator and security trustee under the Revolving Credit Agreement, and ING is acting as sustainability coordinator. The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility comprises a 5.5-year revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of $160 million that matures on March 27, 2029 and reduces on a 20-year age-adjusted profile. The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first lien on five of the Company’s vessels (the “Collateral Vessels”), along with their earnings, insurances and certain other assets, as well as by liens on certain additional assets of the Borrower. Interest on the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility is calculated based upon Term SOFR plus the Applicable Margin (each as defined in the credit agreement). The Applicable Margin is 1.90% and is subject to a sustainability-linked pricing mechanism, pursuant to which the Applicable Margin may be decreased or increased by 0.075%, as described in greater detail below. The sustainability-linked pricing adjustment is linked to three factors, which are consistent with those contained in the Company’s $750 Million Credit Facility described above. The Company will be required to deliver annually, commencing for the period ending June 30, 2024, a sustainability certificate for the preceding calendar year setting out its sustainability-related calculations. If the Company achieves all of the targets set out in the credit agreement, the Applicable Margin will be decreased by 0.075% per annum, while if it fails to achieve any of those targets the Applicable Margin will be increased by that same amount (but no such adjustment will result in the Applicable Margin being increased or decreased from the otherwise-applicable Applicable Margin by more than 0.075% per annum in the aggregate). The $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility also contains customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable to the Company, the Borrower and the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries), including financial covenants that are consistent with existing financial covenants in the $750 Million Credit Facility, as further described below. On September 29, 2023, $50 million of the $160 million available under the $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility was drawn for general corporate purposes (including paying certain expenses related to the new financing). The $50 million was repaid in full on October 30, 2023, increasing the undrawn revolver capacity under this facility to $157.0 million as of December 31, 2023. ING Credit Facility On November 12, 2021, the Company, together with its indirect subsidiaries Diamond S Shipping Inc. (together with the Company, the “Guarantors”) and NT Suez One LLC, the borrower, entered into a credit agreement for a $25 million term loan facility with ING Bank N.V., London Branch, as lender, administrative agent, collateral agent and security trustee (the “ING Credit Facility”). The ING Credit Facility is secured by a first lien on the Suezmax owned by NT Suez One LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, along with its earnings, insurances and certain other assets. The full $25 million was drawn down on November 12, 2021 and the Company incurred issuance and other debt financing costs of $0.6 million on this transaction. Interest on the loan is based upon LIBOR plus a margin of 2%. The loan amortizes in quarterly installments of approximately $0.5 million commencing in February 2022 and matures on the fifth anniversary of the borrowing date in November 2026 with a final balloon payment due at maturity in an amount equal to the remaining principal amount of the loan outstanding on that date. The maturity date is subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of certain events as described in the ING Credit Facility. The Company used substantially all of the proceeds of the loan under the ING Credit Facility to repay approximately one-half of the principal and interest amount due under the $66 Million Credit Facility (approximately $22.0 million), with the remaining balance outstanding being repaid by the other shareholder in NT Suez (see Note 8, “Variable Interest Entities”), WLR/TRF. The ING Credit Facility was amended on March 27, 2023, to change the reference rate from three-month LIBOR to an adjusted three-month Term SOFR rate, effective on the May 12, 2023 interest rate reset date. Ocean Yield Lease Financing On October 26, 2021, the Company entered into lease financing arrangements with Ocean Yield ASA for the sale and leaseback of the six VLCCs that previously collateralized the Sinosure Credit Facility, for a total net sale price of $374.6 million (the “Ocean Yield Lease Financing”). The proceeds from the transactions, which were received on November 8, 2021, were used to prepay the $228.4 million outstanding loan balance under the Sinosure Credit Facility, with the balance intended for general corporate purposes, which included a $100.0 million voluntary prepayment on the $525 Million Facility Revolving Loan. The Company incurred issuance and 98 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents other debt financing costs of $3.9 million on this transaction. Under these lease financing arrangements, each of the six VLCCs is subject to a 10-year bareboat charter with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and purchase obligations at the end of the 10-year term equal to the outstanding principal balance of $82.5 million in total at that date. Charter hire under these arrangements is comprised of a fixed monthly repayment amount aggregating $2.4 million plus a variable interest component calculated based on three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 4.05%. The terms and conditions, including financial covenants, of the arrangements are in-line with those within the Company’s existing debt facilities. The lease financing arrangements with Ocean Yield were amended effective on February 21, 2023, to change the reference rate from three-month LIBOR to an adjusted three-month Term SOFR rate, effective on the interest rate reset date on May 7, 2023. BoComm Lease Financing Relating to Dual-Fuel LNG VLCC Newbuilds On November 15, 2021, the Company and three of its vessel-owning indirect subsidiaries entered into a series of sale and leaseback arrangements with entities affiliated with the Bank of Communications Limited (“BoComm”) in connection with the construction of three dual-fuel LNG VLCC newbuilds (the “BoComm Lease Financing”). BoComm’s obligation to provide funding pursuant to the terms of the sale and leaseback agreements commenced when construction began on the first vessel in November 2021. The three newbuilds were delivered to the Company on March 7, 2023, April 11, 2023, and May 24, 2023, respectively. The BoComm Lease Financing provided the funding of $244.8 million in aggregate ($81.6 million each vessel) over the course of the construction and delivery of the three vessels. Under the lease financing arrangements, each vessel is subject to a seven-year bareboat charter commencing on delivery of each vessel at a bareboat rate of $21,700 per day, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the second year. Toshin Lease Financing On December 7, 2021, the Company entered into lease financing arrangement with Toshin Co., Ltd (“Toshin”) for the sale and leaseback of a 2012-built MR, which was a $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $17.1 million (the “Toshin Lease Financing”). The transaction generated $6.9 million net proceeds, after prepaying $10.2 million of the $390 Million Facility Term Loan. The Company also incurred issuance and other debt financing costs of $0.4 million on this transaction. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to a 10-year fixed rate bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of $6,200 per day for the first three years, $6,000 per day for the second three years, and $5,700 per day for the last four years, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and purchase obligation at the end of the 10-year term for $1.0 million. COSCO Lease Financing On December 23, 2021, the Company entered into lease financing arrangements with Oriental Fleet International Company Limited (“COSCO Shipping”) for the sale and leaseback of an Aframax and an LR2, both $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessels, for a net sale price of $54.0 million in total (the “COSCO Lease Financing”). The transactions generated $19.9 million net proceeds, after prepaying $34.1 million of the $390 Million Facility Term Loan. The Company also incurred issuance and other debt financing costs of $1.4 million on this transaction. Under these lease financing arrangements, each of the two vessels is subject to a seven-year bareboat charter with purchase options exercisable commencing after the end of the second year and purchase obligations at the end of the seven-year term equal to the outstanding principal balance of $18.9 million at that date. Charter hire under these arrangements is comprised of a fixed quarterly repayment amount aggregating $1.3 million plus a variable interest component calculated based on three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 3.90%. The terms and conditions, including financial covenants, of the arrangements are in-line with those within the Company’s existing debt facilities. In May 2023, the Company tendered notice of its intention to exercise its options to purchase one 2013-built Aframax and one 2014-built LR2, which were bareboat chartered-in under the COSCO Lease Financing arrangements. The aggregate purchase price for the two vessels of $46.4 million, consisted of the $45.2 million remaining debt balance and $1.2 million of purchase option premiums. The transaction closed on July 3, 2023. Hyuga Lease Financing On January 14, 2022, the Company entered into a lease financing arrangement with Hyuga Kaiun Co., Ltd (“Hyuga”) for the sale and leaseback of a 2011-built MR, which was a $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $16.7 million (the “Hyuga Lease Financing”). The transaction generated net proceeds of $5.7 million, after prepaying $11.0 million of the $390 Million Facility 99 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Term Loan. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to a nine-year bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of $6,300 per day for the first three years, $6,200 per day for the second three years, and $6,000 per day for the last three years, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and a $2.0 million purchase obligation at the end of the nine-year term. Kaiyo Lease Financing On April 25, 2022, the Company entered into a lease financing arrangement with Kaiyo Ltd. (“Kaiyo”) for the sale and leaseback of a 2010-built MR, which was a $390 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $15.2 million (the “Kaiyo Lease Financing”). The transaction generated net proceeds of $5.4 million, after prepaying $9.8 million of the $390 Million Facility Term Loan. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to an eight-year bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of $6,250 per day for the first four years, and $6,150 per day for the remaining four years, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and a $1.5 million purchase obligation at the end of the eight-year term. Kaisha Lease Financing On May 12, 2022, the Company entered into a lease financing arrangement with Kabushiki Kaisha (“Kaisha”) for the sale and leaseback of a 2010-built MR, which was a $525 Million Facility Collateral Vessel, for a net sale price of $15.2 million (the “Kaisha Lease Financing”). The transaction generated net proceeds of $10.6 million, after prepaying $4.6 million of the $525 Million Facility Term Loan. Under the lease financing arrangement, the vessel is subject to an eight-year bareboat charter at a bareboat rate of $6,250 per day for the first four years, and $6,150 per day for the remaining four years, with purchase options exercisable commencing at the end of the fourth year and a $1.5 million purchase obligation at the end of the eight-year term. Debt Covenants The Company was in compliance with the financial and non-financial covenants under all of its financing arrangements as of December 31, 2023. The $750 Million Credit Facility, $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility, the ING Credit Facility and certain of the Company’s lease financing arrangements contain customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants applicable to the Company, the Borrower and the subsidiary guarantors (and in certain cases, other subsidiaries), including financial covenants that require the Company (i) to maintain a minimum liquidity level of the greater of $50 million and 5% of the Company’s Consolidated Indebtedness; (ii) to ensure the Company’s and its consolidated subsidiaries’ Maximum Leverage Ratio will not exceed 0.60 to 1.00 at any time; (iii) to ensure that Current Assets exceeds Current Liabilities (which is defined to exclude the current potion of Consolidated Indebtedness); and (iv) to ensure the aggregate Fair Market Value of the Collateral Vessels will not be less than 135% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loans and Revolving Loans of each Facility. The Company’s credit facilities also require it to comply with a number of covenants, including the delivery of quarterly and annual financial statements, budgets and annual projections; maintaining required insurances; compliance with laws (including environmental); compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”); maintenance of flag and class of the collateral vessels; restrictions on consolidations, mergers or sales of assets; limitations on liens; limitations on issuance of certain equity interests; limitations on transactions with affiliates; and other customary covenants and related provisions. Interest Expense The following table summarizes interest expense before the impact of capitalized interest, including amortization of issuance and deferred financing costs (for additional information related to deferred financing costs see Note 3, “Significant Accounting Policies”), 100 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents commitment, administrative and other fees, recognized during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 with respect to the Company’s debt facilities: (Dollars in thousands) $750 Million Credit Facility $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility ING Credit Facility Macquarie Credit Facility (1) $390 Million Credit Facility(2) $525 Million Credit Facility(2)(4) $360 Million Credit Facility(2) $66 Million Credit Facility(3) Sinosure Credit Facility(4)(5) Vessel Lease Financing Arrangements 8.5% Senior Notes(6) Total debt related interest expense 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 18,351 616 1,734 — — (2,343) — — 1,974 46,748 — 67,080 $ $ 18,558 — 1,054 1,319 3,346 1,568 1,844 — 2,254 30,223 1,473 61,639 $ $ — — 93 274 13,022 5,021 2,335 568 10,839 2,655 2,447 37,254 (1) On November 17, 2022, the Company repaid the outstanding principal balance of $17.8 million and terminated the Macquarie Credit Facility. (2) On May 24, 2022, the outstanding principal balances under the $390 Million Credit Facility, the $525 Million Credit Facility and the $360 Million Credit Facility were repaid with proceeds from the $750 Million Credit Facility, as described above. (3) On November 12, 2021, the Company repaid the outstanding balance and terminated the $66 Million Credit Facility. (4) The interest expense for these credit facilities includes the amortization for the terminated interest rate swap agreements, as described in Note 9, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Fair Value Disclosures.” (5) On November 8, 2021, the $228.4 million outstanding loan balance under the Sinosure Credit Facility was paid in full using part of the proceeds from the Ocean Yield Lease Financing, as described above. (6) On August 5, 2022, the Company redeemed the $25 million aggregate principal outstanding of the 8.5% Senior Notes due June 2023. The following table summarizes interest paid, excluding deferred financing fees paid, during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 with respect to the Company’s debt facilities: (Dollars in thousands) $750 Million Credit Facility $160 Million Revolving Credit Facility ING Credit Facility Macquarie Credit Facility $390 Million Credit Facility $525 Million Credit Facility $360 Million Credit Facility $66 Million Credit Facility Sinosure Credit Facility Vessel Lease Financing Arrangements 8.5% Senior Notes Total debt related interest expense paid Debt Modifications, Repurchases and Extinguishments 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 19,798 311 1,600 — — — — — — 44,718 — 66,427 $ $ 13,892 — 796 1,087 3,514 3,786 1,870 — — 27,674 1,274 53,893 $ $ — — — 202 11,410 5,569 2,590 624 9,256 2,991 2,130 34,772 During the year ended December 31, 2023, in connection with the prepayment and extinguishment of certain of the Company’s debt facilities, the Company recognized aggregate net losses of $4.0 million, which are included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The net losses principally reflect (i) a $1.7 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the mandatory principal prepayments of the $750 Million Facility Term Loan; (ii) $1.1 million write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the prepayment of the COSCO Lease Financing described above; and (iii) $1.2 million in purchase option premium fees paid in conjunction with the prepayment of the COSCO Lease Financing. 101 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents During the year ended December 31, 2022, in connection with the prepayment and extinguishment of certain of the Company’s debt facilities, the Company recognized an aggregate net loss of $1.3 million from the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with such facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2021, in connection with the prepayments and extinguishment of certain of the Company’s debt facilities, the Company recognized aggregate net losses of $6.6 million, which are included in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The net losses reflect (i) loan breakage fees of $0.3 million related to the Sinosure Credit Facility and a write-off of $1.6 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with such payoff in November 2021, which was treated as an extinguishment of debt, (ii) a $4.2 million loss related to the extinguishment of the financing component of the hybrid instrument upon termination of the interest rate swap agreement associated with the Sinosure Credit Facility, and (iii) a write-off of $0.5 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the $44.3 million principal prepayment of the $390 Million Facility Term Loan in December 2021 (in connection with the lease financing arrangements on three $390 Million Credit Facility Collateral Vessels described above), which were treated as partial extinguishments. As of December 31, 2023, the aggregate annual principal payments required to be made on the Company’s financing arrangements are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Thereafter Aggregate principal payments required 102 International Seaways, Inc. $ $ Amount 127,447 89,688 67,731 51,970 53,187 343,927 733,950 Table of Contents NOTE 11 — ACCOUNTS PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES: (Dollars in thousands) Accounts payable Accrued payroll and benefits Accrued interest expense Due to owners on chartered in vessels Accrued drydock, repairs and vessel betterment costs Bunkers and lubricants Charter revenues received in advance Insurance Accrued vessel expenses Accrued general and administrative expenses Other Total accounts payable, accrued expense and other current liabilities NOTE 12 —TAXES: December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 6,570 $ 9,830 2,114 925 5,208 1,587 6,244 85 17,918 1,974 5,449 57,904 $ 1,826 9,909 7,723 2,644 4,730 603 2,962 527 17,911 1,293 941 51,069 $ $ Income taxes are provided for using the asset and liability method, such that income taxes are recorded based on amounts refundable or payable in the current year and include the results of any differences in the basis of assets and liabilities between U.S. GAAP and tax reporting. The Company derives substantially all of its gross income from the use and operation of vessels in international commerce. The Company’s entities that own and operate vessels are primarily domiciled in the Marshall Islands and Liberia, which do not impose income tax on offshore shipping operations. The Company also has or had subsidiaries in various jurisdictions that performed administrative, commercial or technical management functions. These subsidiaries are subject to income taxes based on the services performed in countries in which those particular offices are located and, accordingly, current and deferred income taxes are recorded. INSW, including its subsidiaries, is exempt from taxation on its U.S. source shipping income under Section 883 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and U.S. Treasury Department regulations. INSW qualified for this exemption because its common shares were treated as primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States or another qualified country and for more than half of the days in the taxable year ended December 31, 2023, less than 50 percent of the total vote and value of the Company’s stock was held by one or more shareholders who each owned 5% or more of the vote and value of the Company’s stock. Beginning in 2024, to the extent INSW is unable to qualify for exemption from tax under Section 883, INSW will be subject to U.S. federal taxation of 4% of its U.S. source shipping income on a gross basis without the benefit of deductions. Shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the U.S. will be considered to be 50% derived from sources within the U.S. Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the U.S. will be considered to be 100% derived from sources within the U.S. INSW does not engage in transportation that gives rise to 100% U.S. source income. Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the U.S. Shipping income derived from sources outside the U.S. will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax. INSW’s vessels operate in various parts of the world, including to or from U.S. ports. There can be no assurance that INSW will continue to qualify for the Section 883 exemption. A substantial portion of income earned by INSW is not subject to income tax, and no deferred taxes are provided on the temporary differences between the tax and financial statement basis of the underlying assets and liabilities for those subsidiaries not subject to income tax in their respective countries of incorporation. The Marshall Islands and Liberia impose tonnage taxes, which are assessed on the tonnage of certain of the Company’s vessels. These tonnage taxes are included in vessel expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. 103 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The components of the income tax provision follow: (Dollars in thousands) Current Deferred Income tax provision 2023 2022 2021 $ $ (3,878) — (3,878) $ $ (97) 9 (88) $ $ (1,608) (10) (1,618) The differences between income taxes expected at the Marshall Islands statutory income tax rate of zero percent and the reported income tax provision are summarized as follows: Change in valuation allowance Unrecognized tax benefits Income subject to tax in other jurisdictions Effective income tax rate The significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets follow: (Dollars in thousands) Deferred tax assets: Net operating loss carryforwards Excess of tax over book basis of depreciable assets Pensions Total deferred tax assets Less: Valuation allowance Net noncurrent deferred tax assets 2023 2022 2021 — % 0.69 % — % 0.69 % 0.04 % 0.10 % (0.12)% 0.02 % (0.24)% (1.14)% 0.17 % (1.21)% December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 $ $ 3,180 $ 806 3,039 7,025 (7,025) — $ 3,200 806 2,906 6,912 (6,912) — As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $12.7 million and $12.8 million, respectively. The net operating loss carryforwards have an indefinite life. The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from its net operating loss carryforwards and certain other deferred tax assets will not be realized and has maintained a valuation allowance of $7.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. If or when recognized, the tax benefits related to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be accounted for as a reduction of income tax expense in the period such reversal occurs. The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest and penalties) of $4.5 million and $1.0 million as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which are included in other current and other non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets: (Dollars in thousands) Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, Increases for positions taken in prior years Increases for positions taken in current year Decreases for positions taken in prior years Settlement Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, $ $ 2023 2022 970 — 3,551 — — 4,521 $ $ 1,081 — 168 (272) (7) 970 Included in the Company's current income tax provision are provisions for uncertain tax positions relating to freight taxes in various tax jurisdictions. During 2023, the Company increased its reserve for uncertain tax liabilities for these jurisdictions by $3.6 million. The Company does not presently anticipate that its provisions for these uncertain tax positions will significantly increase in the next 12 months; however, this is dependent on the jurisdictions in which vessel trading activity occurs. The Company reviews its freight tax obligations on a regular basis and may update its assessment of its tax positions based on available information at that time. Such information may include additional legal advice as to the applicability of freight taxes in relevant jurisdictions. Freight tax regulations are subject to change and interpretation; therefore, the amounts recorded by the Company may change accordingly. 104 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The Company records interest on unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for income taxes. Accrued interest is included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had a total liability for interest of $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. NOTE 13 — CAPITAL STOCK AND STOCK COMPENSATION: Issuance of Shares upon Merger At the Effective Time, the Diamond S Common Shares issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (excluding Diamond S Common Shares owned by Diamond S, the Company, Merger Sub or any of their respective direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries) were cancelled in exchange for 0.55375 of a share of INSW Common Stock and cash payable in respect of fractional shares. The aforementioned 0.55375 exchange ratio set forth in the Merger Agreement resulted in the issuance of 22,536,647 shares of INSW Common Stock with the pre-Merger INSW shareholders and the former Diamond S shareholders owning approximately 55.75% and 44.25%, respectively, of the 50,674,393 issued and outstanding common stock of the Company immediately following the Effective Time. The Company incurred and paid $0.9 million equity issuance costs during the year ended December 31, 2021. Rights Agreement On May 8, 2022, the Company entered into a shareholder rights plan in the form of a Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”), dated as of May 8, 2022, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent. The Rights Agreement was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. In connection with the Rights Agreement, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized and declared a dividend distribution of one right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of common stock, no par value, of the Company. The dividend was payable on May 19, 2022 to stockholders of record at the close of business on such date. While the Rights Agreement was effective immediately, the Rights would become exercisable only if a person or group acquired beneficial ownership, as defined in the Rights Agreement, of 17.5% or more of the Company’s common stock in a transaction not approved by the Company's Board of Directors. In that situation, each holder of a Right (other than the acquiring person or group) would have the right to purchase, upon payment of the then-current exercise price, a number of shares of Company common stock having a market value of twice the exercise price of the Right. In addition, at any time after a person or group acquired 17.5% or more of the Company’s common stock (unless such person or group acquires 50% or more), the Company’s Board of Directors could exchange one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding Right (other than Rights owned by such person or group, which would have become null and void). The expiry date of the Rights Agreement was May 7, 2023. On April 11, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Amended and Restated the Rights Agreement (the “A&R Rights Agreement”), which amends and restates the Rights Agreement dated as of May 8, 2022. The A&R Rights Agreement implements substantially the same features and protective measures of the Rights Agreements and includes the following revised or additional provisions: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) extends the expiration date from May 7, 2023 to April 10, 2026; increases the “Acquiring Person” trigger threshold from 17.5% to 20%; increases the “Purchase Price” from $25 to $50; and includes a qualifying offer provision with a shareholder redemption feature. The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Rights Agreement and the A&R Rights Agreement to enable all stockholders of the Company to realize the full potential value of their investment in the Company. The A&R Rights Agreement is designed to prevent any individual stockholder or group of stockholders from gaining control of the Company through open market accumulation without paying a control premium to all stockholders or by otherwise disadvantaging other stockholders. The A&R Rights Agreement is not intended to prevent a takeover or deter fair offers for securities of the Company that deliver value to all stockholders on an equal basis. It is designed, instead, to encourage anyone seeking to acquire the Company to negotiate with the Board prior to attempting a takeover. The Company’s Board of Directors may consider an earlier termination of the A&R Rights Agreement if market and other conditions warrant. 105 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Dividends During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $308.2 million or $6.29 per share declared by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows: Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date February 27, 2023 May 4, 2023 August 8, 2023 November 6, 2023 March 14, 2023 June 14, 2023 September 13, 2023 December 13, 2023 March 28, 2023 June 28, 2023 September 27, 2023 December 27, 2023 Regular Quarterly Dividend per Share 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 $ $ $ $ Supplemental Dividend per Share 1.88 1.50 1.30 1.13 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Dividends Declared (Dollars in Thousands) 98,321 79,259 69,428 61,157 On February 28, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share of common stock and a supplemental dividend of $1.20 per share of common stock. Both dividends will be paid on March 28, 2024 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid regular quarterly and supplemental cash dividends totaling $69.8 million or $1.42 per share declared by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows: Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date February 28, 2022 June 7, 2022 August 4, 2022 November 7, 2022 March 14, 2022 June 17, 2022 September 14, 2022 December 8, 2022 March 28, 2022 June 29, 2022 September 28, 2022 December 22, 2022 Regular Quarterly Dividend per Share 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.12 $ $ $ $ Supplemental Dividend per Share — — — 1.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Dividends Declared (Dollars in Thousands) 2,978 5,964 5,886 55,015 During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company paid regular quarterly cash dividends totaling $9.4 million or $0.24 per share declared by the Company’s Board of Directors as follows: Declaration Date Record Date Payment Date February 23, 2021 June 4, 2021 July 28, 2021 November 8, 2021 March 11, 2021 June 14, 2021 September 9, 2021 December 9, 2021 March 26, 2021 June 28, 2021 September 23, 2021 December 23, 2021 Regular Quarterly Dividend per Share 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Dividends Declared (Dollars in Thousands) 1,681 1,688 3,041 3,023 See Note 2, “Merger Transaction” for a description of the special dividend aggregating $31.5 million that was paid on July 15, 2021. Share Repurchases In connection with the settlement of vested restricted stock units and the exercise of stock options, the Company repurchased 147,294, 513,479 and 56,065 shares of common stock during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 at an average cost of $44.09, $41.79 and $20.06 per share, respectively (based on the market prices on the dates of vesting or option exercise), from employees, including certain members of management to cover withholding taxes and the cost of options exercised. On March 5, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a resolution authorizing the Company to implement a stock repurchase program. Under the program, the Company could opportunistically repurchase up to $30.0 million worth of shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time over a 24-month period ending March 5, 2021, on the open market or otherwise, in such quantities, at such prices, in such manner and on such terms and conditions as management determined was in the best interests of the Company. Shares owned by employees, directors and other affiliates of the Company were not eligible for repurchase under this program without further authorization from the Board. 106 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents On August 4, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the renewal of the share repurchase program in the amount of $30.0 million for another 24-month period ending August 4, 2022. Subsequently, on October 28, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program from $30.0 million to $50.0 million. In August 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program to $60.0 million from $33.3 million and extended the expiration of the program to December 31, 2023. In August 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the share repurchase program to $50.0 million from $26.1 million. In November 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the extension of the expiry date of the stock repurchase program from December 31, 2023 to December 31, 2025. The following is a summary of the purchases made under the Company’s stock repurchase program during the three years ended December 31, 2023: Year-ended December 31, 2023 2022 2021 Share-based Compensation Total shares repurchased Average Price per share 366,483 687,740 1,077,070 $38.03 $29.08 $15.44 $ $ $ Total Cost (In thousands) 13,937 20,000 16,630 The Company accounts for stock compensation expense in accordance with the fair value based methods required by ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Such fair value based methods require share based payment transactions to be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. Effective November 18, 2016, INSW adopted incentive compensation plans (the “Incentive Plans” as further described below) in order to facilitate the grant of equity and cash incentives to directors, employees, including executive officers and consultants of the Company and certain of its affiliates and to enable the Company and certain of its affiliates to obtain and retain the services of these individuals, which is essential to our long-term success. INSW reserved 2,000,000 shares for issuance under its management incentive plan and 400,000 shares for issuance under its non-employee director incentive compensation plan. Effective June 22, 2020, INSW adopted new Incentive Plans and reserved an additional 1,400,000 shares for issuance under its management incentive plan and 400,000 shares for issuance under its non-employee director incentive compensation plan. Information regarding share-based compensation awards granted by INSW follows: Director Compensation – Restricted Common Stock INSW awarded a total of 26,878, 41,718 and 57,178 restricted common stock shares during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, to its non-employee directors. The weighted average fair value of INSW’s stock on the measurement date of such awards was $37.94 (2023), $24.45 (2022) and $18.95 (2021) per share. Such restricted shares awards vest in full on the earlier of the next annual meeting of the stockholders or grant anniversary date, subject to each director continuing to provide services to INSW through such date. The restricted share awards granted may not be transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered prior to vesting. Prior to the vesting date, a holder of restricted share awards has all the rights of a shareholder of INSW, including the right to vote such shares and the right to receive dividends paid with respect to such shares at the same time as common shareholders generally. Effective as of the Effective Time, as contemplated by the Merger Agreement in order to permit three directors designated by Diamond S to serve on the Board, Mr. Ty E. Wallach resigned as a member of the Board. In connection with his resignation from the Board, the Board approved the accelerated vesting of the 5,035 restricted shares of INSW Common Stock previously granted to Mr. Wallach in June 2021 (valued at approximately $0.1 million). Management Compensation (i) Restricted Stock Replacement Awards Pursuant to the Merger, the Company assumed certain equity awards granted under the Diamond S Shipping Inc. 2019 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan, amended as of March 27, 2019 (the “Diamond S Plan”). After giving effect to the exchange ratio and 107 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents appropriate adjustments to reflect the consummation of the Merger, outstanding awards of 131,845 unvested Diamond S restricted stock issued under the Diamond S Plan, as of the Effective Time, were assumed by the Company and converted into 72,994 of unvested restricted shares with respect to INSW Common Stock, on the same general terms and conditions under the applicable Diamond S plans and award agreements in effect immediately prior to the Effective Time. ASC 805 requires an allocation of the fair-value-based measure of a replacement award to pre-combination service and post-combination service, with the value attributable to pre-combination service included in the consideration transferred and the value attributable to post-combination service recognized as compensation cost by the acquirer. The fair-value-based measure of such replacement award attributable to post-combination service was determined to be $0.6 million. In December 2021, the company recognized stock compensation of $0.2 million in relation to the accelerated vesting of restricted stocks that vested on December 31, 2021 due to a post-merger reduction in force. (ii) Restricted Stock Units During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company awarded 52,890, 348,846 and 64,943 time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain of its employees, including senior officers, respectively. The average grant date fair value of these awards was $51.37 (2023), $21.05 (2022) and $21.58 (2021) per RSU. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of INSW common stock upon vesting. 304,650 of the RSUs awarded during the year ended December 31, 2022 will vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date and 23,256 and 20,940 of the RSUs awarded cliff vested on September 30, 2023 and November 23, 2023, respectively. RSUs may not be transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered until they are settled. Settlement of vested RSUs may be in either shares of common stock or cash, as determined at the discretion of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and shall occur as soon as practicable after the vesting date. If the RSUs are settled in shares of common stock, following the settlement of such shares, the grantee will be the record owner of the shares of common stock and will have all the rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote such shares and the right to receive dividends paid with respect to such shares of common stock. RSUs which have not become vested as of the date of a grantee’s termination from the Company will be forfeited without the payment of any consideration, unless otherwise provided for. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, the Company awarded 52,890, 124,590 and 64,943, respectively, performance-based RSUs to its senior officers and employees. The weighted average grant date fair value of the awards with performance conditions was determined to be $51.37 (2023), $19.63 (2022) and $21.58 (2021) per RSU. The weighted average grant date fair value of the TSR (as defined below) based performance awards, which have a market condition, was estimated using a Monte Carlo probability model and determined to be $53.65 (2023), $20.65 (2022) and $22.50 (2021) per RSU. Each performance stock unit represents a contingent right to receive RSUs based upon the covered employees being continuously employed through the end of the period over which the performance goals are measured and shall vest as follows: (i) one-half of the target RSUs shall vest on the third fiscal year end date following the grant date, subject to INSW’s return on invested capital (“ROIC”) performance in the three-year ROIC performance period relative to a target rate (the “ROIC Target”) set forth in the award agreements; and (ii) one-half of the target RSUs shall vest on the third fiscal year end date following the grant date, subject to INSW’s three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance relative to that of a performance peer group over a three-year performance period (“TSR Target”). Vesting is subject in each case to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors’ certification of achievement of the performance measures and targets no later than March 15th of the year following the vesting date. The TSR Target and the ROIC Target in the 2021 award were achieved at a payout of 88% and 150%, respectively, of target as of the performance period end date of December 31, 2023. Settlement of the vested INSW performance-based RSUs may be in either shares of common stock or cash, as determined by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee in its discretion, and shall occur as soon as practicable after the vesting date. (iii) Stock Options There were no stock options granted during 2023 and 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company awarded to certain senior officers and employees an aggregate of 141,282 stock options. Each stock option represents an option to purchase one share of INSW common stock for an exercise price of $21.58 per share for options granted in 2021. The weighted average grant date fair value of the options granted in 2021 was $9.92 per option. The fair values of the options granted in 2021 were estimated using the Black- Scholes option pricing model with inputs that include the INSW stock price, the INSW exercise price and the following weighted average assumptions: risk free interest rate of 1.06%, dividend yield of 1.23%, expected stock price volatility factor of .55, and expected life at inception of six years. Stock options may not be transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered prior to 108 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents vesting. Each stock option will vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. The stock options expire on the business day immediately preceding the tenth anniversary of the award date. If a stock option grantee’s employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the applicable Form of Grant Agreement), stock options (whether then vested or exercisable or not) will lapse and will not be exercisable. If a stock option grantee’s employment is terminated for reasons other than cause, the option recipient may exercise the vested portion of the stock option but only within such period of time ending on the earlier to occur of (i) the 90th day ending after the option recipient’s employment terminated and (ii) the expiration of the options, provided that if the Optionee’s employment terminates for death or disability the vested portion of the option may be exercised until the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of employment termination and (ii) the expiration date of the options. Activity with respect to restricted common stock and restricted stock units under INSW compensation plans is summarized as follows: Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2020 Granted (2) Forfeitures (3) Vested ($16.05- $21.93 per share) (1) Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2021 Granted (2) Forfeitures (3) Vested ($17.21- $23.53 per share) (1) Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2022 Granted (2) Forfeitures (3) Vested ($19.63 - $43.05 per share) (1) Nonvested Shares Outstanding at December 31, 2023 Common Stock 305,883 264,353 (4,144) (230,051) 336,041 531,246 — (216,889) 650,398 148,891 (3,641) (311,004) 484,644 (1) (2) Includes 147,294 (2023), 74,360 (2022) and 68,013 (2021) shares of common stock sold back to the Company by employees to cover withholding taxes in the year of vesting or during the first quarter of the subsequent year. Includes 16,233, 16,092 and 4,223 incremental performance restricted stock units earned as a result of above target achievement of market condition at December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. (3) Represents restricted stock units forfeited because performance targets or service requirements were not achieved as of the measurement date. Activity with respect to stock options under INSW compensation plans is summarized as follows: Options Outstanding at December 31, 2020 Granted Exercised Options Outstanding at December 31, 2021 Granted Exercised Options Outstanding at December 31, 2022 Granted Exercised Options Outstanding at December 31, 2023 Options Exercisable at December 31, 2023 Common Stock 670,624 141,282 — 811,906 — (541,656) 270,250 — (30,654) 239,596 192,500 The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding and exercisable stock options at December 31, 2023 was 6.07 years and 5.79 years, respectively. The range of exercise prices of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2023 was between $17.21 and $21.93 per share, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of the stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2023 was $20.42 and $20.14, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of the INSW stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2023 were $6.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively. 109 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period applicable to each grant, using the straight-line method. Compensation expense with respect to restricted common stock and restricted stock units outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $7.9 million, $5.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively. Compensation expense relating to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 was $0.6 million, $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, there was $8.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to INSW nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.57 years. NOTE 14 —ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS): The components of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of related taxes, in the consolidated balance sheets follow: (Dollars in thousands) Unrealized gains on derivative instruments Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost (pension plans) December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 $ $ 9,349 $ (10,412) (1,063) $ 16,912 (9,948) 6,964 The following tables present the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of related taxes, for the three years ended December 31, 2023. (Dollars in thousands) Balance at December 31, 2020 Current period change, excluding amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) Balance at December 31, 2021 Current period change, excluding amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) Balance at December 31, 2022 Current period change, excluding amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) Balance at December 31, 2023 110 International Seaways, Inc. Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost (pension plans) Unrealized gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges $ $ (24,098)$ 7,896 11,339 (4,863) 22,905 (1,130) 16,912 3,187 (10,750) 9,349 $ (8,515)$ 634 384 (7,497) (2,759) 308 (9,948) (1,043) 579 (10,412)$ Total (32,613) 8,530 11,723 (12,360) 20,146 (822) 6,964 2,144 (10,171) (1,063) Table of Contents The following table presents information with respect to amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) for the three years ended December 31, 2023. (Dollars in thousands) Reclassifications of (gains)/losses on cash flow hedges: Interest rate swaps entered into by the Company's equity method joint venture investees Interest rate swaps entered into by the Company's subsidiaries Reclassifications of (gains)/losses on discontinued hedging instruments Interest rate swap entered into by the Company's subsidiaries Reclassifications of losses on other-than-insignificant financing element of derivatives: Interest rate swaps entered into by the Company's subsidiaries Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost (pension plans): Net periodic benefit costs associated with pension and postretirement benefit plans Total before and net of tax 2023 2022 2021 Statement of Operations Line Item $ — $ (8,601) 130 $ (1,044) Equity in result of 963 affiliated companies 4,752 Interest expense (2,149) (216) 379 Interest expense — — 5,245 Interest expense 579 (10,171) $ $ 308 (822) $ 384 Other expense 11,723 The following amounts are included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) at December 31, 2023, which have not yet been recognized in net periodic cost: unrecognized prior service costs of $1.7 million ($1.4 million net of tax) and unrecognized actuarial losses of $10.4 million ($9.0 million net of tax). At December 31, 2023, the Company expects that it will reclassify $5.3 million (gross and net of tax) of net gain on derivative instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) to earnings during the next twelve months due to the payment of variable rate interest associated with floating rate debt of INSW’s equity method investees and the interest rate swaps held by the Company. See Note 9, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Derivatives and Fair Value,” for additional disclosures relating to derivative instruments. NOTE 15 — REVENUE: Revenue Recognition The majority of the Company’s contracts for pool revenues, time and bareboat charter revenues, and voyage charter revenues are accounted for as lease revenue under ASC 842. The Company’s contracts with pools are short term which are cancellable with up to 90 days' notice. As of December 31, 2023, the Company is a party to time charter out contracts with customers on three VLCCs, two Suezmaxes, one Aframax, and six MRs with expiry dates ranging from August 2024 to April 2030. The Company’s contracts with customers for voyage charters are short term and vary in length based upon the duration of each voyage. Lease revenue for non-variable lease payments is recognized over the lease term on a straight-line basis and lease revenue for variable lease payments (e.g., demurrage) are recognized in the period in which the changes in facts and circumstances on which the variable lease payments are based occur. See Note 3, “Significant Accounting Policies,” for additional detail on the Company’s accounting policies regarding revenue recognition for leases. Lightering services provided by the Company’s Crude Tanker Lightering Business and voyage charter contracts that do not meet the definition of a lease are accounted for as service revenues under ASC 606. In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of or consumes promised services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for these services. See Note 3, “Significant Accounting Policies,” for additional detail on the Company’s accounting policies regarding service revenue recognition and costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. 111 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents The following table presents the Company’s revenues from leases accounted for under ASC 842 and revenues from services accounted for under ASC 606 for the three years ended December 31, 2023: (Dollars in thousands) 2023 Revenues from leases Pool revenues Time and bareboat charter revenues Voyage charter revenues from non-variable lease payments(1) Voyage charter revenues from variable lease payments Revenues from services Voyage charter revenues from lightering services Total shipping revenues 2022 Revenues from leases Pool revenues Time and bareboat charter revenues Voyage charter revenues from non-variable lease payments(1) Voyage charter revenues from variable lease payments Revenues from services Voyage charter revenues from lightering services Total shipping revenues 2021 Revenues from leases Pool revenues Time and bareboat charter revenues Voyage charter revenues from non-variable lease payments(1) Voyage charter revenues from variable lease payments Revenues from services Voyage charter revenues from lightering services Total shipping revenues Crude Tankers Product Carriers Totals $ $ $ $ $ $ 399,904 67,883 7,860 66 48,293 524,006 262,170 23,633 8,451 62 37,383 331,699 80,586 40,469 9,415 453 25,353 156,276 $ $ $ $ $ $ 505,904 28,661 12,688 516 — 547,769 512,752 9,401 11,149 (336) — 532,966 95,411 9,625 11,005 229 — 116,270 $ $ $ $ $ $ 905,808 96,544 20,548 582 48,293 1,071,775 774,922 33,034 19,600 (274) 37,383 864,665 175,997 50,094 20,420 682 25,353 272,546 (1) Includes $0, $1.8 million and $0.5 million of loss of hire claim proceeds received during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Contract Balances The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers, and significant changes in contract assets and liabilities balances, associated with revenue from services accounted for under ASC 606. Balances related to revenues from leases accounted for under ASC 842 are excluded from the table below. (Dollars in thousands) Opening balance as of January 1, 2023 Closing balance as of December 31, 2023 Voyage receivables - Billed receivables Contract assets (Unbilled voyage receivables) Contract liabilities (Deferred revenues and off hires) $ 9,452 $ 6,512 1,866 $ 1,029 — — We receive payments from customers based on the schedule established in our contracts. Contract assets relate to our conditional right to consideration for our completed performance obligations under contracts and decrease when the right to consideration becomes unconditional or payments are received. Contract liabilities include payments received in advance of performance under contracts and 112 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents are recognized when performance under the respective contract has been completed. Deferred revenues allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations will be recognized over time as the services are performed. Performance Obligations All of the Company’s performance obligations, and associated revenue, are generally transferred to customers over time. The expected duration of services is less than one year. There were no material adjustments to revenues from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods recognized during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract As of December 31, 2023, there were no unamortized deferred costs of obtaining or fulfilling a contract. NOTE 16 — LEASES: As permitted under ASC 842, the Company has elected not to apply the provisions of ASC 842 to short term leases, which include: (i) tanker vessels chartered-in where the duration of the charter was one year or less at inception; (ii) workboats employed in the Crude Tankers Lightering business which have a noncancelable lease term of 12-months or less; and (iii) short term leases of office and other space. Contracts under which the Company is a Lessee The Company currently has two major categories of leases – chartered-in vessels and leased office and other space. The expenses recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2023 for the lease component of these leases are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Operating lease cost Vessel assets Charter hire expenses Finance lease cost Vessel assets Amortization of right-of-use assets Interest on lease liabilities Office and other space General and administrative Voyage expenses Short-term lease cost Vessel assets (1) Charter hire expenses Total lease cost 2023 2022 2021 $ 6,192 $ 9,935 $ 9,337 731 124 869 180 196 34 911 172 — — 1,275 170 $ 18,679 26,775 $ 8,636 19,884 $ 4,746 15,528 (1) Excludes vessels and workboats spot chartered-in under operating leases and employed in the Crude Tankers Lightering business for periods of less than one month each, totaling $2.1 million, $1.4 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, including both lease and non-lease components. 113 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities Operating cash flows used for operating leases Finance cash flows used for finance leases Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases was as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Operating lease right-of-use assets Finance lease right-of-use assets Current portion of operating lease liabilities Current portion of finance lease liabilities Long-term operating lease liabilities Total operating and finance lease liabilities Weighted average remaining lease term - operating leases(1) Weighted average discount rate - operating leases(1) 2023 2022 2021 $ 6,028 42,284 $ 10,207 533 $ 10,464 — $ $ $ December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 20,391 $ — (10,223) $ — (11,631) (21,854) $ 4.42 years 5.90% 8,471 44,391 (1,596) (41,870) (7,740) (51,206) 8.56 years 4.13% (1) The weighted average remaining lease term and discount rate as of December 31, 2022 exclude finance lease liabilities. Such finance leases had weighted average remaining lease term of 0.20 years at December 31, 2022 and the annualized weighted average discount rate was 4.78% as of December 31, 2022. 1. Charters-in of vessel assets: As of December 31, 2023, the Company has a commitment to time charter-in one LR1 through June 2025. The minimum lease liabilities and related number of operating days under this operating lease as of December 31, 2023 are as follows: Time Charters-in (Dollars in thousands) 2024 2025 Total lease payments (lease component only) less imputed interest Total operating lease liabilities 114 International Seaways, Inc. Amount Operating Days $ $ 9,657 4,301 13,958 (631) 13,327 366 163 529 Table of Contents 2. Office and other space: The Company has operating leases for office and lightering workboat dock space. These leases have expiry dates ranging from December 2024 to May 2033. The lease for the workboat dock space contains renewal options executable by the Company for periods through December 2027. We have determined that the options through December 2024 are reasonably certain to be executed by the Company, and accordingly the options are included in the lease liability and right of use asset calculations for such lease. Payments of lease liabilities for office and other space as of December 31, 2023 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Thereafter Total lease payments less imputed interest Total operating lease liabilities Contracts under which the Company is a Lessor $ $ Amount 1,261 1,093 1,113 1,077 1,077 4,754 10,375 (1,848) 8,527 See Note 15, “Revenue,” for discussion on the Company’s revenues from operating leases accounted for under ASC 842. The future minimum revenues, before reduction for brokerage commissions, expected to be received on non-cancelable time charters for three VLCCs, two Suezmaxes, one Aframax, and six MRs and the related revenue days as of December 31, 2023 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Thereafter Future minimum revenues Amount Revenue Days $ $ 115,067 82,414 47,856 33,945 34,038 41,013 354,333 4,250 3,017 1,604 1,095 1,098 1,323 12,387 Future minimum contracted revenues do not include the Company’s share of time charters entered into by the pools in which it participates or profit-sharing above the base rate on the newbuild dual-fuel LNG VLCCs. Revenues from a time charter are not generally received when a vessel is off-hire, including time required for normal periodic maintenance of the vessel. In arriving at the minimum future charter revenues, an estimated time off-hire to perform periodic maintenance on each vessel has been deducted, although there is no assurance that such estimate will be reflective of the actual off-hire in the future. NOTE 17 —PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS: Pension plans The Company has obligations outstanding under a defined benefit pension plan in the U.K. The plan provides defined benefits based on years of service and final average salary. The plan was closed to new entrants and accrual from June 2014. The Company has provided a guarantee to the trustees of the OSG Ship Management (UK) Ltd. Retirement Benefits Plan (the “Scheme”) in the amount of the unfunded deficiency calculated on a solvency basis, if the principal employer fails to make the required periodic contributions to the Scheme. 115 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Information with respect to the Scheme for which INSW uses a December 31 measurement date, is as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Change in benefit obligation: Benefit obligation at beginning of year Interest cost on benefit obligation Actuarial losses/(gains) Benefits paid Foreign exchange losses/(gains) Benefit obligation at year end Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Benefits paid Foreign exchange gains/(losses) Fair value of plan assets at year end (Unfunded)/funded status at December 31 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 $ $ 16,753 $ 827 265 (848) 879 17,876 16,833 839 — (848) 879 17,703 (173) $ 27,305 442 (7,545) (789) (2,660) 16,753 30,140 (10,281) 672 (789) (2,909) 16,833 80 The unfunded or funded benefit obligation for the pension plan is included in other liabilities or other assets, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Information for net periodic benefit cost/(income) for the three years ended December 31, 2023 follows: (Dollars in thousands) Components of expense: Interest cost on benefit obligation Expected return on plan assets Amortization of prior-service costs Recognized net actuarial loss Net periodic benefit cost/(income) 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 827 (1,080) 74 506 327 $ $ $ 442 (955) 73 235 (205) $ 360 (1,053) 80 304 (309) Unrecognized actuarial losses are amortized over a period of 14 years, which represents the term to retirement of the youngest member of the Scheme. The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations follow: Discount rate December 31, 2023 December 31, 2022 4.55% 4.90% The selection of a single discount rate for the defined benefit plan was derived from bond yield curves, which the Company believed as of such dates to be appropriate for the plan, reflecting the length of the liabilities and the yields obtainable on investment grade bonds. The assumption for a long-term rate of return on assets was based on a weighted average of rates of return on the investment sectors in which the assets are invested. The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs follow: Discount rate Expected (long-term) return on plan assets Rate of future compensation increases 116 International Seaways, Inc. 2023 2022 2021 4.90% 6.37% - 1.80% 3.48% - 1.20% 3.36% - Table of Contents Expected benefit payments are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Years 2029-2032 Pension benefits 1,123 1,096 1,277 1,066 1,127 6,078 11,767 $ $ The fair values of the Company’s pension plan assets at December 31, 2023, by asset category are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Matched fund Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 (1) $ 17,703 $ — $ 17,703 (1) Quoted prices for the matched funds are not available from an active market source since such investments are pooled investment funds. The unitized pooled investment vehicles have been valued at the latest available bid price or single price provided by the pooled investment manager. Shares in other pooled arrangements have been valued at the latest available net asset value, determined in accordance with fair value principles, provided by the pooled investment manager. A target allocation of 25% is maintained with return seeking assets, with the balance of 75% invested in liability driven investments to target a 100% match to interest rate risks by asset value (mainly government bonds). The Company contributed $0.7 million, and $0.7 million to the Scheme in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The originally scheduled deficit reduction contribution of approximately $0.7 million to the Plan during 2023 was deferred until 2024 by agreement with the Scheme trustees, making its total expected contribution for 2024 approximately $1.5 million. The Company and the trustees of the Scheme have agreed to target achieving a funding level that would permit the securing of the Scheme’s obligations with an insurance company by 2025. The contributions are subject to change after an actuarial estimate of the Scheme's funding level is produced. Defined Contribution Plans The Company has defined contribution plans covering all eligible shore-based employees in the U.K. and U.S. Contributions are limited to amounts allowable for income tax purposes and include employer matching contributions to the plans. All contributions to the plans are at the discretion of the Company or as mandated by statutory laws. The employer matching contributions to the plans during each of the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 were $0.7 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively. NOTE 18 — OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE): (Dollars in thousands) Investment income - interest Net actuarial gain on defined benefit pension plan Write-off of deferred financing costs Loss on extinguishment of debt Gain on sale of interest in DASM Other 2023 2022 2021 $ $ 13,963 $ 3,653 $ 510 (2,686) (1,323) — 188 10,652 $ 647 (1,266) — (135) (567) 2,332 $ 104 667 (2,113) (4,465) — (140) (5,947) Refer to Note 10, “Debt,” for additional information relating to the write-off of deferred financing costs and the loss on extinguishment of debt. 117 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents NOTE 19 — CONTINGENCIES: INSW’s policy for recording legal costs related to contingencies is to expense such legal costs as incurred. Multi-Employer Plans The Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (“MNOPF”) is a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan covering British crew members that served as officers on board INSW’s vessels (as well as vessels of other owners). The trustees of the plan have indicated that, under the terms of the High Court ruling in 2005, which established the liability of past employers to fund the deficit on the Post 1978 section of MNOPF, calls for further contributions may be required if additional actuarial deficits arise or if other employers liable for contributions are not able to pay their share in the future. As the amount of any such assessment cannot be reasonably estimated, no reserves have been recorded for this contingency in INSW’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2023. The MNOPF annual actuarial funding report as of March 31, 2023, showed its funded status as being in deficit by approximately £11 million, but at December 31, 2023, no additional employer contributions have been sought or addressed. The next full actuarial valuation will be as of March 31, 2024. The Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund (“MNRPF”) is a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan covering British crew members that served as ratings (seamen) on board INSW’s vessels (as well as vessels of other owners) more than 20 years ago. Based on a High Court ruling in 2015, the Trustees of the MNRPF levied assessments to recover the significant deficit in the plan from participating employers. Participating employers include current employers, historic employers that have made voluntary contributions, and historic employers such as INSW that have made no deficit contributions. Calls for contributions may be required if additional actuarial deficits arise or if other employers liable for contributions are unable to pay their share in the future. A reserve of $0.3 million has been recorded in INSW’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2023, based on the Trustees of the MNRFP estimated calculation of INSW’s share of the March 31, 2023 deficit valuation, which is expected to be finalized by June 30, 2024. Spin-Off Related Agreements On November 30, 2016, INSW was spun off from OSG as a separate publicly traded company. In connection with the spin-off, INSW and OSG entered into several agreements, including a separation and distribution agreement, an employee matters agreement and a transition services agreement. While most of the obligations under those agreements were subsequently fulfilled, certain provisions (including in particular mutual indemnification provisions under the separation and distribution agreement and the employee matters agreement) continue in force. Legal Proceedings Arising in the Ordinary Course of Business The Company is a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to various suits in the ordinary course of business for monetary relief arising principally from personal injuries, wrongful death, collision or other casualty and to claims arising under charter parties and other contract disputes. A substantial majority of such personal injury, wrongful death, collision or other casualty claims against the Company are covered by insurance (subject to deductibles not material in amount). Each of the claims involves an amount which, in the opinion of management, should not be material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In late July 2023, one of the Company’s vessels was arrested in connection with a commercial dispute arising earlier in the year. Although the vessel was subsequently released, the arresting parties continue to seek approximately $25 million in security. The underlying commercial dispute is in arbitration in England. The Company is defending itself vigorously against the allegations in the underlying dispute. The Company is currently unable to predict the outcome of this matter, and no estimate of liability has been accrued at this time. 118 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of International Seaways, Inc. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of International Seaways, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income/(loss), cash flows and changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 29, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Critical Audit Matter The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. Impairment of Vessels As of December 31, 2023, the carrying value of the Company’s vessels was approximately $1.9 billion. As described in Notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company assesses whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its vessels may not be recoverable. Upon identification of an indicator of impairment, the Company evaluates the recoverability of a vessel by comparing its carrying amount to the undiscounted future net cash flows it is expected to generate. If the Company determines that a vessel’s carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment charge is recognized equal to the excess of the vessel’s carrying amount over its estimated fair value determined using an income or market approach. Throughout the year, the Company performed an evaluation of its vessels to determine if any such indicators of impairment were present. Auditing the Company’s impairment assessment was complex due to the significant estimation uncertainty and judgment required to evaluate the future market and economic conditions and forecasted charter rates in a Description of the Matter 119 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit cyclical and volatile industry, as well as the degree of subjectivity involved in determining indicative market values for a set of representative vessels in each of the Company’s vessel classes. We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company's impairment assessment process, including controls over management’s identification of impairment indicators and management’s review of the significant assumptions described above. For example, we tested management’s review of the methods used to forecast charter rates and the residual value of the vessels as well as its review of the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of the key inputs used in developing the estimates of fair value, including third-party appraisals. To test the Company’s impairment assessment process, including its identification of impairment indicators, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used, evaluating the significant assumptions described above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the key inputs used by management in its analyses. For example, we compared the forecasted charter rates used by management to current and past performance of the vessels, forecasted market rates and other relevant external market and industry data. Further, we evaluated the third-party appraisal reports used by management to support their assessment. We involved our internal valuation specialists to assist in our evaluation of the methodologies and the significant assumptions applied in performing the impairment assessment. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017. New York, New York February 29, 2024 120 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of International Seaways, Inc. Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting We have audited International Seaways, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, International Seaways, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income/(loss), cash flows and changes in equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes and our report dated February 29, 2024 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP New York, New York February 29, 2024 121 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2023 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. (b) Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting Management of the Company is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management, with participation of the CEO and CFO, has performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on the provisions of “Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Management has concluded the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2023 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 122 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION Insider Trading Arrangements and Policies During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of our directors or executive officers adopted Rule 10b5-1 trading plans and none of our directors or executive officers terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or adopted or terminated a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K). Issuance of Stock Consideration On February 23, 2024, the Company entered into agreements to acquire two 2014-built and four 2015-built MR Product Carriers for an aggregate consideration of approximately $232 million, payable 85% in cash and 15% in shares of common stock of the Company. Each of the six vessel purchases is subject to satisfaction of closing conditions customary for vessel purchases and the vessels are expected to be delivered to the Company by the end of the second quarter of 2024. ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PART III See Item 14 below. Executive Officers The table below sets forth the name and age of each executive officer of the Company and the date such executive officer was elected to his or her current position with the Company. The term of office of each executive officer continues until the first meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company immediately following the next annual meeting of its stockholders, and until the election and qualification of his or her successor. There is no family relationship between the executive officers. Name Lois K. Zabrocky Jeffrey D. Pribor James D. Small III Derek Solon William Nugent Adewale O. Oshodi Age 54 66 55 47 55 44 Position(s) Held Has Served as Such Since President and Chief Executive Officer and Director Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer Chief Administrative Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer Senior Vice President and Chief Technical and Sustainability Officer Vice President and Controller November 2016 and May 2018 November 2016 November 2016 March 2021 and November 2016 March 2021 and November 2016 November 2016 The business experience and certain other background information regarding our executive officers is set forth below. Lois K. Zabrocky. Ms. Zabrocky has served as President and Chief Executive Office of the Company since November 30, 2016, when the Company became an independent, publicly traded corporation, and has served as a Director of the Company since May 2018. Under her leadership, the Company’s fleet has grown from 55 vessels (including six vessels held by joint ventures) to more than 75 vessels and the Company’s revenues have increased from approximately $400 million to more than $1 billion. Prior to her appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Ms. Zabrocky served in various roles during a career of 25 years at OSG, the Company’s former parent corporation. From August 2014 through November 2016, she was Co-President of OSG and Head of International Flag Strategic Business Unit of OSG, from 2008 through August 2014 she was a Senior Vice President of OSG and from May 2011 through August 2014, she was Chief Commercial Officer of the International Flag Strategic Business Unit of OSG. She served as a director of the Company from November 2011 through November 2016 during which time the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary of OSG. 123 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Jeffrey D. Pribor. From 2013 until his appointment to the role of Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, Mr. Pribor was the Global Head of Maritime Investment Banking at Jefferies & Company, Inc. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of General Maritime Corporation, one of the world’s leading tanker shipping companies, from September 2004 to February 2013. Prior to General Maritime Corporation, from 2002 to 2004, Mr. Pribor was Managing Director and President of DnB NOR Markets, Inc. From 2001 to 2002, Mr. Pribor was Managing Director and Group Head of Transportation Banking at ABN AMRO, Inc. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Pribor was Managing Director and Sector Head of Transportation and Logistics investment banking for ING Barings. James D. Small III. Mr. Small has served as Chief Administrative Officer, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company since November 30, 2016. He served as Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of OSG from March 2015 until November 30, 2016. Prior to joining OSG in March 2015, Mr. Small worked for more than 18 years at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP (“Cleary Gottlieb”), a law firm, the last seven years as counsel. At Cleary Gottlieb, Mr. Small’s practice focused on corporate and financial transactions, U.S. securities law matters in U.S. and international capital markets transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and general corporate transactions. As counsel at Cleary Gottlieb, Mr. Small provided legal services to OSG between 2013 and February 2015. Derek Solon. Mr. Solon has served as Senior Vice President of the Company since March 2021 and as Chief Commercial Officer of the Company since November 30, 2016. He served as Vice President of the Company from November 2016 until March 2021. From August 2014 through November 2016, Mr. Solon was Vice President, Commercial for OSG’s International Flag Strategic Business Unit, and from 2012 to August 2014, he served as Vice President, Sale & Purchase. Before joining OSG, Mr. Solon was a Marine Projects Broker at Poten & Partners in New York from 2003 to 2012. Prior to joining the commercial shipping industry, Mr. Solon served as an officer in the United States Navy since 1998. William Nugent. Mr. Nugent has served as Senior Vice President of the Company since March 2021 and as Head of Ship Operations of the Company since November 30, 2016. On March 8, 2023, William Nugent’s title was changed to Senior Vice President and Chief Technical and Sustainability Officer instead of Senior Vice President and Head of Ship Operations. He served as Vice President of the Company from November 2016 until March 2021. From July 2014 until November 2016, Mr. Nugent served as Vice President and Head of Ship Operations for OSG’s International Flag Strategic Business Unit. Prior to this, he was responsible for the Technical Services Group, OSG’s global engineering team. He joined OSG in 2006 as Assistant Vice President for New Construction, was promoted to head of the department in 2008 and oversaw the construction of ships, tugs and barges in China, Korea, and the United States. Mr. Nugent previously worked for OSG from 2000 to 2002 overseeing construction of ships in Korea. In all, Mr. Nugent has overseen construction of more than 50 vessels. Earlier in his career, Mr. Nugent was Director of Basic Design and Project Manager for Alion Science and Technology and John J. McMullen Associates, Inc., respectively. Adewale O. Oshodi. Mr. Oshodi has been a Vice President and the Controller of the Company since November 30, 2016. He served as the Controller of OSG from July 2014 to November 30, 2016 and as Secretary of OSG from July 2014 until March 2015. He was Director, Corporate Reporting from September 2010 when he joined OSG until July 2014. Mr. Oshodi began his career in the New York commercial audit practice of Deloitte & Touche, LLP in 2000. As an Audit Manager between 2005 and 2008 and as an Audit Senior Manager between 2008 and 2010, Mr. Oshodi worked primarily on audits of companies in the maritime industry. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is an integral part of the Company’s business conduct compliance program and embodies the commitment of the Company and its subsidiaries to conduct operations in accordance with the highest legal and ethical standards. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to all of the Company’s officers, directors and employees. Each is responsible for understanding and complying with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Company also has an Insider Trading Policy which prohibits the Company’s directors and employees from purchasing or selling securities of the Company while in possession of material nonpublic information or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit. The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits the Company’s directors and employees from hedging their ownership of securities of the Company. In addition, the Company has an Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy which memorializes the Company’s commitment to adhere faithfully to both the letter and spirit of all applicable anti-bribery legislation in the conduct of the Company’s business activities worldwide. Further, the Company has an Inventive Compensation Recoupment Policy pursuant to which under specified circumstances (i) executive officers of the Company are required to repay or return erroneously awarded compensation to the Company in accordance with the Company’s clawback rules and (ii) the Board of Director of the Company may, in its good faith discretion, require officers of the Company to repay all or a portion of their incentive compensation to the Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Insider Trading Policy, the Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy and the Incentive Compensation 124 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents Recoupment Policy are posted on the Company’s website, which is www.intlseas.com, and are available in print upon the request of any stockholder of the Company. The Company intends to use its website as a method of disseminating this disclosure, as permitted by applicable SEC rules. Any such disclosure will be posted to the Company website within four business days following the date of any such amendment. The Company’s website and the information contained on that site, or connected to that site, are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION See Item 14 below. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table provides information as of December 31, 2023 with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans, which have been approved by the Company’s shareholders. For a description of the material features of the Company’s equity compensation plans and a description of shares withheld in connection with the vesting of previously-granted equity awards, see Note 13, “Capital Stock and Stock Compensation,” to the consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) 239,596 $ $20.42 624,016 * * Consists of 346,333 shares eligible to be granted under the Company’s 2020 Management Incentive Compensation Plan and 277,683 shares under the 2020 Non-Employee Director Incentive Compensation Plan. See also Item 14 below. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE See Item 14 below. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Except for the table in Item 12 above, the information called for under Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed by the Company no later than 120 days after December 31, 2023, in connection with its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 125 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a)(1) The following consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed in response to Item 8. PART IV Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2023 and 2022. Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. All Schedules of the Company have been omitted since they are not applicable or are not required. (a)(3) The following exhibits are included in response to Item 15(b): 2.1 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 The Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. Separation and Distribution Agreement dated as of November 30, 2016 by and between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and Registrant (schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K; the Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request) (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Agreement and plan of merger dated as of March 30, 2021 by and among the Registrant, Dispatch Merger Sub, Inc. and Diamond S Shipping Inc. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 6, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference). Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amended and Restated By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Registration Rights Agreements dated as of November 30, 2016 between Registrant and certain stockholders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of April 11, 2023 between the Registrant and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., a federally chartered trust company, as Rights Agent, which includes the form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit A and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Common Stock as Exhibit B (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 11, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference). Indenture, dated May 31, 2018, between the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference). 126 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents **4.4 *10.1 *10.1.1 *10.2 *10.2.1 *10.2.2 *10.2.3 *10.2.4 *10.2.5 *10.2.6 *10.3 *10.3.1 *10.3.2 *10.3.3 10.4 *10.4.1 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 23, 2024 between the Registrant and Wayzata Opportunities Fund III, L.P. International Seaways, Inc. 2020 Non-Executive Director Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. Non-Executive Director Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). International Seaways, Inc. Management Incentive Compensation Plan ("MICP") (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 25, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Stock Option Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Alternate Stock Option Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Alternate Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. MICP Alternate Performance RSU Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference). International Seaways, Inc. 2020 Management Incentive Compensation Plan (“2020 MICP”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. 2020 MICP Stock Option Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. 2020 MICP Time-Based RSU Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of International Seaways, Inc. 2020 MICP Performance-Based RSU Grant Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Employee Matters Agreement between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Enhanced Severance Agreement (files as Exhibit 10.5.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). 127 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents *10.5 *10.5.1 *10.5.2 *10.5.3 *10.5.4 *10.5.5 *10.5.6 *10.5.7 *10.5.8 *10.6 *10.6.1 *10.6.2 *10.6.3 *10.6.4 *10.6.5 Employment Agreement dated September 29, 2014 between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and Lois K. Zabrocky (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 1 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 2 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement dated August 3, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on November 4, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 3 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 4 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 5 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 6 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 7 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 8 to Lois K. Zabrocky’s Employment Agreement (field as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference). Employment Agreement dated February 13, 2015 between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and James D. Small III (filed as Exhibit 10.29 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 1 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement dated March 30, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 2 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement dated August 3, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on November 4, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 3 to James D. Small III's Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on October 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 4 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.8 the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 5 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). 128 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents *10.6.6 *10.7 *10.7.1 *10.7.2 *10.7.3 *10.7.4 *10.7.5 *10.7.6 *10.7.7 *10.8 *10.8.1 *10.8.2 *10.8.3 *10.8.4 *10.8.5 *10.9** *10.10 Form of Amendment No. 6 to James D. Small III’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference). Employment Agreement dated September 29, 2014 between Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. and Adewale O. Oshodi (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 1 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2014 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 2 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 3 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 5, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 4 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment no. 5 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 6 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 7 to Adewale O. Oshodi’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference). Employment Agreement dated November 9, 2016 between the Registrant and Jeffrey D. Pribor (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Amendment No. 6 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed on November 9, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 1 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement dated November 9, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated April 5, 2019 and incorporated herein by reference). Amendment No. 2 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 8, 2020 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment no. 3 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 22, 2021 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No. 4 to Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 12, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). Form of Amendment No 5. To Jeffrey D. Pribor’s Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference). Letter Agreement dated as of February 19, 2024 by and between the Registrant and Nadim Z. Qureshi. International Seaways Ship Management LLC Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference). 129 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents *10.11 *10.12 10.14 10.15 10.15.1 10.16 **21 **23 **31.1 **31.2 **32 First Amendment to the International Seaways Ship Management LLC Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (the “Supplemental Executive Seaways Plan”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). Second Amendment to the Supplemental Executive Savings Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). Distribution Agreement dated December 20, 2023 among the Registrant and Evercore Group L.L.C. and Jefferies LLC (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference). Credit Agreement dated as of May 20, 2022 (the “$750 Million Facility”) among the Registrant, International Seaways Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time parties thereto, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as administrative agent for the Lenders and as collateral agent and security trustee for the Secured Parties and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as sustainability coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference). First Amendment dated as of March 10, 2023 to the $750 Million Facility among the Registrant, International Seaways Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time party thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as administrative agent for the lenders and as, collateral agent and security trustee for the Secured Parties, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, as sustainability coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 15, 2023 and incorporated herein by reference.) $160 Million Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 27, 2023, among the Registrant, International Seaways Operating Corporation, the other Guarantors from time to time parties thereto, Nordea Bank Abp, New York Branch, as administrative agent, Collateral Agent, Coordinator and security trustee for the Secured Parties, and ING Bank, London Branch, as sustainability coordinator (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2023 and incorporated by reference herein). List of significant subsidiaries of the Registrant. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as amended. Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as amended. Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002. *97** International Seaways, Inc. Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy dated as of November 27, 2023. EX-101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document. EX-101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Schema. EX-101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase. EX-101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase. EX-101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase. EX-101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase. 130 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents EX-104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) (1) The Exhibits marked with one asterisk (*) are a management contract or a compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit. (2) The Exhibits which have not previously been filed or listed are marked with two asterisks (**). ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY None 131 International Seaways, Inc. Table of Contents SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: February 29, 2024 INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, INC. By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Pribor Jeffrey D. Pribor Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Each of such persons appoints Lois K. Zabrocky and Jeffrey D. Pribor, and each of them, as his agents and attorneys-in-fact, in his name, place and stead in all capacities, to sign and file with the SEC any amendments to this report and any exhibits and other documents in connection therewith, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact or either of them may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney. Name /s/ LOIS K. ZABROCKY Lois K. Zabrocky, Principal Executive Officer; Director /s/ JEFFREY D. PRIBOR Jeffrey D. Pribor, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer /s/ DOUGLAS D. WHEAT Douglas D. Wheat, Director /s/ TIMOTHY BERNLOHR Timothy Bernlohr, Director /s/ IAN T. BLACKLEY Ian T. Blackley, Director /s/ ALEXANDRA K. BLANKENSHIP Alexandra K. Blankenship, Director /s/ RANDEE DAY Randee Day, Director /s/ DAVID I. GREENBERG David I. Greenberg, Director /s/ JOSEPH I. KRONSBERG Joseph I. Kronsberg, Director /s/ CRAIG H. STEVENSON JR. Craig H. Stevenson, Jr., Director 132 International Seaways, Inc. Date February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 February 29, 2024 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above