ITT
Annual Report 2014

Plain-text annual report

ITT Corporation 2014 Annual Report At ITT, we have a clear vision of where the world’s key industries are heading and how we can help them get there. Over the past three years, we have built on that expertise by establishing our foundation as a focused multi-industrial company while further developing the capabilities that will help us continue to solve our customers’ most critical problems. Today, we are a leading manufacturer of highly engineered critical components and customized technology solutions for the energy, transportation and industrial markets. Our portfolio has strength and durability, balance and diversity. Our businesses are aligned with global growth drivers – urbanization, a growing middle class and sustainable development - and our products provide solutions for customers in key end markets that underpin our modern way of life. Our work is made possible by the talent and contributions of our more than 9,400 employees in more than 35 countries, who are committed every day to reflecting our principles of impeccable character, bold thinking and collective know-how. Together, they serve customers around the world and are outstanding ambassadors for our long-standing brands – including Goulds pumps, Cannon connectors, KONI shock absorbers and Enidine energy absorption components, to name a few – that are recognized and trusted globally. Thanks to the contributions of our people, we generated great results in 2014 and positioned our company for further growth and success in the years ahead. At ITT, we are well on our way to achieving the characteristics of all great growth companies - from premier financial performance, to market differentiation and customer focus, to a winning culture and best-in-class talent and capabilities. We’re continuing to make the right moves today and to invest in the capabilities to ensure the ITT legacy expands and extends far into the future. Our Results 7% 2014 organic revenue growth 14% 17% 2014 adjusted segment operating income growth 22% 2014 emerging market organic revenue growth 2014 adjusted EPS growth For a reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP results, please see our website at itt.com/investors. Our Portfolio: Balanced and Diversified End Markets Industrial 37% Balanced & Diverse Energy 20% Transportation 43% Business Mix Industrial Process 45% Control Technologies 11% $2.7B Interconnect Solutions 15% Motion Technologies 29% Geography E. Europe, Middle East & Africa 11% Western Europe 26% 32% Emerging Markets Asia Pacific 14% Latin America 9% Charts represent 2014 revenue profile. North America 40% Dear Shareowners, Employees, Customers and Friends, Over the past three years, ITT has delivered solid performance and results while consistently investing for growth. Our 2014 full-year results are the latest reflection of our success with organic revenue up 7 percent, emerging market organic revenue up 14 percent, adjusted segment operating income up 17 percent and adjusted earnings per share from continuing operations up 22 percent. These outstanding results reflect our diversified and balanced portfolio, as we performed well in all three of our key end markets in 2014. Our transportation and industrial markets, when combined, grew 5 percent led by our aerospace, automotive and rail businesses. The strength in these two markets, representing nearly 80 percent of our portfolio, was further enhanced by the 20 percent growth in our oil and gas market. Our results also reflect our focused execution, which was driven by the contributions and commitment of our more than 9,400 employees globally. From enhancing our brake pad and pump capabilities, to turning around our connectors and shock absorber businesses, to advancing our Lean journey, our employees have all used their bold thinking and collective know-how to build on our multi-year track record of performance. As we look ahead, our strategy will be centered on three key areas, reflecting our even sharper focus considering the dynamic operating environment expected in 2015: Optimizing Our Execution – We will continue our momentum in capturing opportunities to improve efficiency and costs, and we expect to take a variety of actions that will strengthen our focus and market leadership positions while enabling us to better serve customers and prepare for long-term growth. Many of these actions will take place in our Industrial Process business as we leverage our investments in this business and address the current realities of the oil and gas market. In addition, we will continue to advance our Lean transformation, which will help us achieve another year of significant gross productivity savings. Expanding Our Market Positions – We expect strong performance in our non-oil and gas related end markets. In the transportation end market, we expect our growth to be driven by global expansion in our automotive friction business, and in the industrial market, we anticipate that our growth will reflect strong chemical and industrial pump activity as we intensify our focus on our core markets. We also anticipate emerging market growth as the result of our ongoing above-market performance in our automotive friction business in China. Balanced and Effective Capital Deployment – We will continue our track record in this area by funding major organic investments that extend our global reach and capabilities while focusing on acquisitions, which are also a critical component of our long-term capital deployment priorities. As part of these efforts, we will leverage the work we have done over the past year to build out our cultivation capabilities by enhancing our processes and reorganizing our internal resources while building out our pipeline. We believe this focus will provide us significant advantages as we move through 2015 and continue to face a difficult external environment with foreign exchange and global oil and gas market headwinds. Across ITT, we are confident that through our collective commitment, we will continue to drive our multi-industry strategy, which is keenly focused on long-term growth and value creation for shareowners. We remain committed to achieving everything our stakeholders expect of us, and we look forward to continuing on this journey with each of you. Sincerely, Denise L. Ramos Chief Executive Officer and President ITT BOARD OF DIRECTORS SHAREOWNER INFORMATION INDEPENDENT AUDITORS Deloitte & Touche LLP 333 Ludlow Street Stamford, CT 06902 TRANSFER AGENT & REGISTRAR Wells Fargo Shareowner Services 1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101 Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100 (800) 254-2823 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREOWNERS The annual meeting will be held at 9 a.m. EDT on Friday, May 8, 2015 at ITT Corporation Headquarters, 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Copies of the ITT Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Principles and Committee charters are available through our website: www.itt.com. OMBUDSPERSON PROGRAM The ITT Ombudsperson Program encourages employees to report possible violations of our Code of Corporate Conduct or other misconduct. The ITT Ombudsperson can be contacted at: (800) 777-1738. ITT HEADQUARTERS ITT Corporation 1133 Westchester Avenue White Plains, NY 10604 Tel: (914) 641-2000 www.itt.com FOR GENERAL CORPORATE INFORMATION, CONTACT: Kathleen Bark Reputation and Media kathleen.bark@itt.com FOR FINANCIAL AND INDUSTRY INFORMATION, CONTACT: Melissa Trombetta Investor Relations melissa.trombetta@itt.com Frank T. MacInnis Chairman of the ITT Board of Directors and Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, EMCOR Group, Inc. Denise L. Ramos Chief Executive Officer and President Orlando D. Ashford President, Holland America Line G. Peter D’Aloia Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, American Standard Companies, Inc. Donald DeFosset, Jr. Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Walter Industries, Inc. Christina A. Gold Former Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, The Western Union Company, Inc. Richard P. Lavin Chief Executive Officer and President, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Rebecca A. McDonald Former Chief Executive Officer, Laurus Energy, Inc. Timothy H. Powers Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Hubbell Incorporated ITT LEADERSHIP TEAM Denise L. Ramos Chief Executive Officer and President Aris C. Chicles Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process Victoria L. Creamer Senior Vice President, Human Resources Mary Beth Gustafsson Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer Luca Savi Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies Thomas M. Scalera Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Neil W. Yeargin Senior Vice President and President, Interconnect Solutions UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition period from to Commission File No. 001-05672 ITT CORPORATION Incorporated in the State of Indiana 13-5158950 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604 (Principal Executive Office) Telephone Number: (914) 641-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, all of which are registered on The New York Stock Exchange, Inc.: COMMON STOCK, $1 PAR VALUE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2014 was approximately $4.4 billion. As of February 16, 2015, there were outstanding 91.0 million shares of common stock, $1 par value, of the registrant. Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part II and Part III of this Form 10-K. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE  TABLE OF CONTENTS Description of Business ITEM PART I 1 1A Risk Factors 1B Unresolved Staff Comments 2 3 4 * Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures Executive Officers of the Registrant PART II 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Performance Graph Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 6 7 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 8 9 9A Controls and Procedures 9B Other Information Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure PART III 10 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 11 Executive Compensation 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 14 Principal Accounting Fees and Services PART IV 15 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule Signatures Exhibit Index * Included pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K. PAGE 1 14 22 22 23 23 23 25 27 29 57 58 58 59 60 62 62 62 62 62 63 II-1 II-3 FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Some of the information included herein includes forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about the business and future financial results of the industry in which we operate, and other legal, regulatory and economic developments. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, future strategic plans and other statements that describe the company’s business strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals, and any discussion of future operating or financial performance. We use words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend," "plan," "believe," "target,“ “future,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “guidance” and other similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are uncertain and to some extent unpredictable, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in, or reasonably inferred from, such forward-looking statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on current plans and expectations of our management, expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will occur or that anticipated results will be achieved or accomplished. More information on factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors,” and in other documents filed from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You can inspect, read and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the SEC's Public Reference Room, which is located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information regarding the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov on which you may access electronic copies of our SEC filings. We make available free of charge at www.itt.com/investors copies of materials we file with, or furnish to, the SEC. ITT uses the Investor Relations page of its Internet site at www.itt.com/investors to disclose important information to the public. Information contained on ITT's Internet site, or that can be accessed through its Internet site, does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITT has included its Internet site address only as an inactive textual reference and does not intend it to be an active link to its Internet site. Our corporate headquarters are located at 1133 Westchester Avenue, White Plains, NY 10604 and the telephone number of this location is (914) 641-2000. PART I ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (In millions, except per share amounts, unless otherwise stated) COMPANY OVERVIEW ITT Corporation is a diversified manufacturer of highly engineered critical components and customized technology solutions for the energy, transportation and industrial markets. Building on its heritage of engineering, ITT partners with its customers to deliver enduring solutions to the key industries that underpin our modern way of life. With approximately 9,400 employees in more than 35 countries and sales in over 100 countries, we are committed to creating long-term sustainable value for all of our stakeholders. That goal is reflected in our organizational philosophy, which we refer to as The ITT Way and discuss in detail below. ITT is a global company with a balanced and diversified portfolio, positioned to capitalize on enduring macro trends such as energy creation and efficiency, resource scarcity, large-scale urbanization, and the growing middle class in emerging economies. In 2014, 65% of our sales were outside the U.S., including 32% from emerging growth markets. Further, approximately 30% of our revenue is derived from aftermarket products and services where we capture repeatable revenues from our large installed base of specialized products. Additionally, approximately 35% of our revenue is derived from positions our products hold on long-lived customer platforms. Similar to the aftermarket, these are also long-term recurring revenues. We manufacture components that are integral to the operation of systems and manufacturing processes in our key markets. Our products provide enabling functionality for applications where reliability and performance are critically important to our customers and the users of their products. For example, our industrial pumps serve the critical function of transporting fluids throughout chemical processes at petrochemical plants. The pumps are critical to the production requirements of our customers' plants and their reliability helps our customers meet the delivery time and quality expectations of the users of the products they produce. Our product and service offerings are organized in four segments: Industrial Process, Motion Technologies, Interconnect Solutions, and Control Technologies. These businesses generally operate within niche positions in large, attractive markets where specialized engineered solutions are required to support the needs of our industrial, transportation, and energy customers. Industrial Process manufactures engineered fluid process equipment serving a diversified mix of customers in global infrastructure industries such as chemical, oil and gas, mining, and other industrial process markets and is a provider of plant optimization and efficiency solutions and aftermarket services and parts. Motion Technologies manufactures brake components, shock absorbers and damping technologies for the global automotive, truck and trailer, public bus and rail transportation markets. Interconnect Solutions manufactures and designs a wide range of highly engineered harsh environment connector solutions that make it possible to transfer signal and power between electronic devices which service global customers for the aerospace and defense, industrial and transportation, oil and gas, and medical markets. Control Technologies manufactures specialized equipment, including actuation, valves, and noise and energy absorption components for the aerospace and defense, and industrial markets. The table below provides revenue by segment for each of the last three years. See section titled “Segment Information” in Company Overview and Note 3, “Segment Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about each of our segments. (In Millions) Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Revenue 1 2014 $ 1,208.3 769.4 392.8 290.5 (6.4) $ 2,654.6 2013 $ 1,107.4 721.8 395.5 278.2 (6.0) $ 2,496.9 $ 2012 955.8 626.2 375.7 277.1 (7.0) $ 2,227.8 Unless the context otherwise indicates, references herein to “ITT,” “the Company,” and such words as “we,” “us,” and “our” include ITT Corporation and its subsidiaries. ITT Corporation was incorporated as ITT Industries, Inc. on September 5, 1995 in the State of Indiana. On July 1, 2006, ITT Industries, Inc. changed its name to ITT Corporation. On October 31, 2011 (the Distribution Date), ITT completed the tax-free spin-off (referred to herein as the Distribution) of its Defense and Information Solutions business, Exelis Inc. (Exelis), and its water-related businesses, Xylem Inc. (Xylem) by way of a distribution of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Exelis common stock and Xylem common stock, on a pro rata basis, to ITT shareholders of record on October 17, 2011. Exelis and Xylem are now independent companies trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “XLS” and “XYL,” respectively. The Distribution was made pursuant to a Distribution Agreement, dated October 25, 2011, among ITT, Exelis and Xylem (the Distribution Agreement). Following the Distribution, ITT did not own any shares of common stock of Exelis or Xylem. Business Strengths and Strategies Management believes that the Company has several competitive advantages that allow it to sustain and grow its market positions. ITT is a diversified industrial technology company with established businesses that share six unifying characteristics, referred to as The ITT Way: 1. The design and manufacture of highly engineered products for critical applications 2. Leaders in attractive and defensible niches 3. Globally concentrated footprint and highly diversified markets 4. Longstanding brands and operating history 5. Proven management system and leadership 6. Our Values: Respect, Responsibility, Integrity Application of The ITT Way focuses on the principles that guide us as a company, namely leading with technology, differentiating with customers and optimizing our work. The concepts of The ITT Way enable us to create an enduring impact, sustainable growth and premier performance, through customer success, engaged employees, proud partners, enhanced communities, and shareholder value. At the center of The ITT Way are our people, who strive to create an enduring impact every day. Our employees think strategically, aim for flawless execution, and are proud of their work. We build an inspiring work environment that is based on our values of respect, responsibility, and integrity. We believe in the power of rewarding, and recognizing and developing our people as they make their own impact at our Company. We focus on attracting the right talent, in the right places, to deliver on our customer's complex global needs. As a result, a significant strength for ITT is that our businesses share a common, repeatable operating model. Each business is a leader in applying its technology and engineering expertise to solve some of the most pressing challenges of our customers. Our applied engineering aptitude provides a special business fit with our customers given the critical nature of their applications. This in turn provides us with unique insight to our customers' requirements and enables us to develop solutions to better assist our customers achieve their business goals. Our technology and customer intimacy together produce opportunities to capture recurring revenue streams, aftermarket opportunities and long-lived platforms from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). ITT possesses a core competency operating this unified model across businesses in order to create value. These businesses also tend to operate in varying business cycles, which reduces exposures to any one economic cycle. The oil and gas business in our Industrial Process segment is representative of the capability that many of ITT’s businesses have to generate profitable growth from our common operating model. In 2007, Industrial Process began to pursue growth in the oil and gas market because of its long-term attractiveness, our existing engineering capabilities and brand strength, and the aftermarket potential. We have been actively investing in our technology through product line extensions and we continue to aggressively build on our portfolio, upgrading and expanding our global capabilities to accommodate highly complex pumps that are used in the oil and gas market. We have expanded our strategic footprint and increased proximity to our customers through new facilities in India in 2008, Saudi Arabia in 2009, and expanded capabilities in Korea and the U.S. in 2013 and 2014. To supplement these organic growth drivers, the acquisitions of Canberra Pumps in Brazil during 2010, Blakers Pump Engineers in Australia during 2011, and Joh. Heinr. Bornemann GmbH (Bornemann) in 2012 provide us with a global leadership position. These actions have led to a compound annual growth rate for oil and gas market revenues in our Industrial Process business of 18.7% from 2007 to 2014. However, due to the decline in oil prices during 2014 and into 2015, the historical compound annual growth rate likely will not be achieved during 2015. Revenue stemming from the oil and gas market was approximately 20% of total revenue during 2014. 2 The Company also possesses strong leading brands, such as Goulds Pumps, Bornemann, Cannon, VEAM, BIW Connector Systems, KONI, Enidine and ITT, in many of its niche markets. These brands are associated with quality, reliability, durability, and engineering excellence. The Company’s brands extend internationally and is performs strongly in emerging growth markets including China, India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Russia. In addition to branding efforts, another strength is our collective utilization of our well-established ITT Management System (IMS), which is a data-driven, world-class capability-based framework we use to manage our businesses for superior performance. IMS also serves as a guide for the decisions and actions of our employees. We deploy IMS in each of our businesses and we have implemented a system of enterprise councils comprised of leaders from each business in the areas of: 1) Technology and Innovation; 2) Commercial Excellence; and 3) Operational Excellence. We have also implemented the ITT Risk Center of Excellence which strengthens ITT’s risk management process through proactive cross functional risk assessments. We have also established a Global Indirect Sourcing (GIS) team that coordinates certain sourcing and procurement initiatives. While our activities may vary between our businesses, our subject matter leaders in these collaborative, cross-business formal structures provide us with the opportunity to intelligently leverage best practices, bold thinking, and our collective know-how in areas such as customer relationship management, product development, coordinated sourcing initiatives, innovation, technology sharing, and risk management. These strengths support a balanced operating strategy designed to increase the Company's earnings and financial returns. The elements of this strategy are disciplined organic growth through global market expansion and new product development, combined with operational improvements through the IMS that focus on reducing costs and cycle times and improving productivity, quality, and safety on a continuing basis. We believe we can drive growth by helping our existing customers grow, while cultivating new customers through geographic and product expansion. While the IMS is principally deployed internally, IMS benefits our customers through our continuous improvement efforts which are centered on exceeding our customer’s requirements. We aspire to drive long-term average annual organic revenue growth of approximately 5%-7%, with corresponding operating margin expansion of 50-70 basis points, achieve an adjusted free cash flow conversion rate of greater than 105%, and deliver adjusted earnings per share growth of 10%-15% per year. Our long-term incentive plan includes a return on invested capital (ROIC) metric that reinforces management's focus on driving increased shareholder value. ITT’s strategy to achieve our profitable growth goals consists of the following key areas: Differentiated Customer Experience ITT places significant focus on managing the relationships it has with its customers through a formalized end-to- end process, referred to as Commercial Excellence, used to strategically price our products and services, develop our value propositions, and assist our customers to solve their toughest business challenges through a robust voice of customer process. ITT is able to accomplish this by providing an efficient and productive customer experience through advanced order configuration, on-time delivery, and reliable products and services. In addition, ITT has key strategic account relationships throughout the industries we serve. Strategic accounts are customer partnerships, often global in scale, which promote the shared benefits of improved business processes between ITT and its customers. Our strategic account agreements promote customer intimacy, optimized service and delivery performance, and provide growth and profit improvement opportunities. In some instances we are able to leverage these relationships across segments. For example, both Industrial Process and Interconnect Solutions supply products and services to certain oil and gas customers through Industrial Process’s strategic account relationships. The Company views its customer relationships as its primary vehicle for growth and technological advancement. Understanding our customer’s growth plans and challenges allows ITT’s businesses to tailor and deliver reliable and timely products and services. For instance, collaboration between the Interconnect Solutions medical technologies' team, our customer’s U.S.-based design team, and our customer's China-based manufacturing team resulted in securing new business for a new global patient monitoring platform. The benefits from our differentiated customer experience often cross geographic regions, as evidenced by U.S. automotive platform wins by Motion Technologies with Japanese OEMs, relationships that began with the customer experience delivered by our operations team in China. These are the types of relationships that we continue to enhance and grow. The Company has a core competency in application engineering because a majority of our products feature leading technologies that operate in harsh environments. Our products are designed to function reliably and consistently in these harsh conditions, such as the high pressure and extreme temperatures experienced on the ocean floor or the extreme vibration and corrosion experienced by high-speed rail cars. For example, Interconnect Solutions has developed a patented kPaC Technology, which responds to harsh oil well conditions by balancing the pressure of the electrically conductive well-fluid outside the device with a benign viscous dielectric medium inside the device. New designs have passed environmental testing, demonstrating that they can perform in 6,500 psi environments at 500 degrees Fahrenheit and higher while being subjected to rapid decompressions. 3 In addition, to further satisfy the company's customer base, ITT has differentiated itself in the critical arena of technology and research & development (R&D). ITT has a proven track record in new product development and introduction. ITT’s approach to technology is to work with its customers in tailoring the right approach to a particular customer need or problem. In our Industrial Process business, our engineers work with our customers in a number of highly challenging environments to improve the way our pumps are installed and operated. This allows our customers to run their processes more reliably and cost effectively by using less energy, which is the largest operating cost in a pump’s life cycle. Focused Geographic and Aftermarket Market Expansion ITT is a global company with 65% of its 2014 revenue derived from markets outside of the U.S., including 32% from emerging growth markets. Accordingly, ITT has located approximately half of its manufacturing facilities outside of the U.S. in order to lower costs, achieve strategic proximity to customers and further increase international sales and market share. For example, ICS has had a long-term presence at its Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China facility which produces products for both domestic consumption in China and for global customers. Shenzhen is a low- cost manufacturing site that also possesses component fabrication capabilities such as metal stamping, plating, machining and injection molding. The Shenzhen site is staffed with engineers who design specific products for the Asia Pacific and China and the broader Asia Pacific region. Because of the global nature of our businesses, ITT benefits from opportunities in emerging growth markets and in developed markets. For example, Motion Technologies is the leading manufacturer of automotive brake pads in Europe. One of the largest growth opportunities for this European-based business is the emerging market in China. In 2012, Motion Technologies opened a R&D center and production facility in Wuxi, China, focused on expanding and enhancing braking technologies for the local transportation market. We are now in the process of expanding the production capacity of the Wuxi facility to meet the increasing demand and market share growth that we are experiencing in the region. In addition, we have and expect to continue to expand our R&D capabilities to make products that are relevant to local markets. Our focus is on products where reliability and engineered solutions are valued. We have established R&D technology centers in key markets such as India and China. In 2013, Industrial Process opened its state-of-the- art Korea-engineered pump Center of Excellence in order to continue to better serve and expand its market presence in the Eastern Hemisphere for engineered pumps. Industrial Process also expanded its R&D capabilities and testing in North America to serve a growing customer base by opening a new facility in Seneca Falls, New York during 2014. In addition to geographic expansion opportunities, expanding our base of recurring revenue streams in the aftermarket is a key source of our growth. Aftermarket sources account for approximately 30% of our 2014 annual revenue. Our Industrial Process, Motion Technologies, and Control Technologies segments benefit from repeat sales of original products, consumable spare parts, and services as a result of our large, global, and growing installed base of products. Aftermarket business generally carries higher margins than original product sales and tends to be a more stable, recurring revenue stream than project-based businesses. The key drivers of aftermarket demand are the wear and tear on critical components in harsh environment applications. We develop our aftermarket business through our end-user sales channels and dedicated service personnel. The Company views this as a valuable source of future earnings and is actively marketing its capabilities while investing in technologies that reduce the customer’s total life- cycle cost. For example, our Industrial Process business has an established international service center network with eight Pump Repair and Overhaul shops (PRO shops) in the U.S. and facilities in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Columbia, England, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Thailand, and Venezuela. In addition, during 2014, Industrial Process established an engineering center in Glasgow, Scotland to support global aftermarket service growth. Control Technologies provides aftermarket spares and repair services for commercial and military aircraft platforms. Our up-front investments to gain positions on aircraft platforms generate long-term repeatable aftermarket revenue. Control Technologies provides aftermarket services through our FAR 145 certified repair station located in our Valencia, California facility. Our dedicated sales channels have strong relationships with global airlines and we have a partnership agreement with a large maintenance, repair, and overview (MRO) facility that has regional presence and certifications in China. Motion Technologies also has recurring revenue streams from automotive and rail platform content. Its products generally serve on long-term platforms whereby once the original equipment products are sold, aftermarket parts are needed to replace and extend the life of a vehicle. Our up-front investments to gain positions on automotive platforms generate long-term repeatable original equipment (OE) revenue, while also providing replacement pad opportunities in certain markets. Another example of a recurring revenue stream is on various aerospace platforms where ICS has been supplying content for many decades, such as with our rectangular and circular connectors which have been used in commercial aviation and military aerospace applications for over 50 years. 4 Operational Excellence The Company strives to increase its profit margins and improve its competitive position in all of its businesses through its operational excellence strategy focused on integrated execution and continuous improvement processes to drive customer loyalty, and productivity through alignment, engagement and empowerment of our employees. The core elements of this strategy are Lean Six Sigma, enterprise-wide councils (Commercial Excellence, Operational Excellence, and Technology), and shared services deployment in the areas of Global Sourcing, Finance, Human Resources, Information Technology, and Legal Services. Certain operations, including shared services, are leveraged among the Company’s segments resulting in additional cost savings and synergies through the consolidation of operations and reduced general and administrative expenses. These strategies enable the Company to realize operating efficiencies, increase customer satisfaction, and increase free cash flow while lowering operating costs, streamlining processes, eliminating waste and improving cycle times. The ITT culture has long embraced Lean Six Sigma as its central operating tenet, encompassing lean manufacturing, as well as continuous process improvement in other critical areas such as customer service and order entry and fulfillment. Our intent is to drive ever-increasing levels of quality, speed, and efficiency throughout the organization. In 2012, we launched an enterprise-wide lean transformation initiative with the goal of improving all elements of a lean enterprise. This initiative encompasses not only core lean, problem solving and continuous improvement principles but also leadership, talent and cultural aspects. Our lean transformation is on track and we are seeing results: physical transformation is evident in our sites through meaningful changes in factory flow, pull and visual management supported by cultural transformation with high employee engagement, leader standard work and self-managed teams. Many of our core metrics around safety, quality, delivery, inventory and productivity have been improving year-over-year and we are seeing inventory management improvements and structurally lower breakeven points. We are also moving beyond the factory floor to improve the efficiency of other critical processes of the value chain to become a truly lean enterprise. Effective Capital Deployment Effective capital deployment, including resource optimization and a disciplined focus on liquidity and cash management is a major part of how we achieve our financial performance goals. ITT’s businesses operate in growing and highly fragmented niche markets, which provide opportunities for increasing market share. Our resource optimization processes, including integrated decision-making and resource deployment processes provide insight to our efficient capital allocation across a portfolio of strategic options and effective deployment of critical resources and assets across our integrated supply chain that aligns and connects our commercial front-end and business strategies to our sourcing, manufacturing and footprint strategies. ITT estimates the sum of its served addressable markets to be approximately $42 billion worldwide. Given these dynamics and ITT’s technology investments, global reach and vibrant brands, the Company believes it has the opportunity to continue to expand geographically, broaden its product lines, improve its market position, and increase earnings through organic revenue growth and operational efficiencies and through targeted acquisitions. ITT continues to prioritize deploying capital for organic growth and then acquisitive growth. ITT’s acquisition strategy generally targets firms in similar businesses and end-markets that have unique and differentiated products, services, and technologies. Targeted Leverage of Our Capabilities In addition to the key elements of the Company’s growth strategy described above, ITT leverages its diverse set of resources and capabilities across its businesses in order to maximize the Company’s value creation potential. By working cohesively across our businesses, we are enhancing products and performance and making strong progress in driving long-term profitable growth. The Company is continually evaluating cross-business revenue synergies, cost saving and value creating opportunities and views the following assets and capabilities as core to this objective: • ITT Brand – The ITT brand is well regarded and widely recognized by most key stakeholders and markets, particularly in emerging growth markets. This provides our segments with brand recognition for new products in key emerging growth markets such as Brazil, China, India, and Russia. • Enterprise Councils – Cross-business councils in the areas of operational excellence, commercial excellence, technology and innovation, and risk management. While our activities may vary across our segments, our subject matter leaders in these collaborative cross-business formal structures provide us with the opportunity to intelligently leverage best practices, bold thinking and our collective know-how in areas such as customer relationship management, product development, coordinated sourcing initiatives, innovation, technology sharing, and risk management. • Strategic Accounts – Further development and expansion of our global strategic account program to bring the combined technical capabilities of multiple ITT businesses to address incremental customer opportunities. 5 • Sourcing – Indirect sourcing activities across ITT's businesses are managed centrally to better leverage our third-party contracts and pricing and to evaluate vendor performance. • Shared Functional Excellence – Centralizing our processes and services so that all four of our businesses can have access to the best resources and better utilize these systems to create additional value, including shared service locations in North America, China, and Europe to reduce overhead costs and improve effectiveness. In information technology, we are focused on utilizing global templates and standard processes to drive value across ITT. Similarly, we are enhancing the way we approach our most valuable asset, our people. We are continuing to develop a comprehensive talent and human resource capability that will unite and strengthen our collective ability to attract talent, and consolidate and streamline policies and procedures through globally integrated systems. • Our Culture – Our people are at the center of all we do, and our values of respect, responsibility and integrity are central to who we are as a company. They are the standards to which we hold ourselves and they guide our words and actions every day. Our values are also the foundation of The ITT Way, which is how we differentiate ourselves, operate to grow and create value. It is our model for how we create enduring impact for all of our stakeholders. Segment Information Industrial Process The Industrial Process segment is a global manufacturer of industrial pumps, valves and related equipment, and is a provider of plant optimization and efficiency solutions and aftermarket services and parts. Headquartered in Seneca Falls, New York, its operations include five primary product categories: Goulds Pumps Goulds Pumps is the largest product category in the Industrial Process segment and is a market leader with over 160 years of product design history. Goulds Pumps is focused on customer needs primarily in the oil and gas, chemical, mining, general industrial, pulp & paper, and power markets. The Goulds Pumps brand is among the most widely recognized brands in the global pump industry. Goulds has a broad portfolio of centrifugal pumps including ANSI (American National Standard Institute) and ISO (International Standards Organization) chemical pumps, API (American Petroleum Institute) pumps for the petrochemical and oil and gas industry, slurry and process pumps for the mining industry and paper stock pumps for the pulp & paper industry. Our portfolio also includes vertical, axial flow, multi- stage and other pumps that are used in a multitude of industries. Industrial Process has transformed its Goulds Pumps business considerably over the past five years. Investments have been made in this business to expand our portfolio of products, augment our testing and global R&D capabilities, automate the order entry processes, and strengthen our global manufacturing, service and aftermarket capabilities. Industrial Process has been successful in penetrating target markets, like oil and gas, mining, and petrochemical by upgrading existing products and infrastructure, increasing global engineering resources, enhancing global product and project management and driving operational excellence. Bornemann Bornemann, acquired during the fourth quarter of 2012, is a manufacturer of pumps and systems utilized in the oil and gas, marine, food and pharmaceutical industries with over a 150 year history. The Bornemann acquisition provided the Industrial Process business with leading edge technologies and multiphase application expertise that strategically aligned with other aspects of the Industrial Process business and further expanded ITT’s presence in global oil and gas markets. Bornemann technologies include twin screw pumps, multiphase boosting system pumps and progressive cavity pumps. Bornemann twin screw pumps are rotating displacement pumps that are ideal for mixtures of crude oil, gas, water and handle virtually any non-homogeneous fluid, regardless of viscosity, lubricity or abrasiveness. Twin screw pumps can be used onshore, offshore and sub-sea and the dry running technology also allows the presence of gases. The multiphase boosting system pumps provide a complete system solution for a wide range of performance conditions and harsh environmental conditions. Progressive cavity pumps are used to convey a wide range of media, in particular highly viscous and abrasive materials such as slurry, crude oil and greases. Progressive cavity pumps are an optimum solution to conveying tasks where the conveyed product is too viscous and flows too poorly to be pumped by other types of pumps. 6 ITT Engineered Valves ITT Engineered Valves is a manufacturer of process valves for the biopharmaceutical, mining, power, pulp and paper and general industrial markets. ITT Engineered Valves has over 65 years of experience in design, fabrication and engineering of market leading industrial knife-gate (Fabri-Valve) and sanitary diaphragm valves (Pure-Flo). Pure- Flo is a leading provider of sanitary valves to the global biopharmaceutical market. ITT PRO Services ITT PRO Services is the aftermarket solutions offering which strives to extend equipment life in its customers’ facilities. PRO Services provides an array of services focused on reducing equipment total cost of ownership and increasing plant output by minimizing downtime. The typical services provided include parts supply, inventory optimization, field service, energy and reliability assessments, repairs, upgrades and overall equipment maintenance. PRO Services offerings include ProShop Repair and Upgrades, ProCast, ProSmart, Goulds Pumps Parts, PumpSmart, and Plant Performance Services. ITT C’treat ITT C’treat is a leading provider of water treatment systems for offshore oil and gas production platforms and has been in business since 1980. Its skid-mounted, reverse osmosis watermakers convert seawater into drinking water and process water for the world’s largest offshore oil and gas exploration and production corporations. Industrial Process services an extensive base of customers from large multi-national engineering, procurement and construction firms (EPC) to regional distributors with thousands of customers. We estimate this segment’s served addressable market to be in excess of $20 billion worldwide. In 2014, Industrial Process’ customers operated in the oil and gas (39%), chemical & petrochemical (20%), general industrial (16%), mining (13%), pulp & paper (7%) and power (4%) markets. These customers are geographically distributed with a regional mix of North America (50%), Latin America (17%), Asia Pacific (14%), Middle East & Africa (11%) and Europe (8%). Industrial Process recognizes that serving the customer before, during and after installation is critical. We utilize global and diversified sales channel structures. End-users are serviced by an extensive network of independent industrial distributors (primarily in North America), which account for approximately 29% of total Industrial Process sales, and representatives which complement our customer-focused direct sales and service organization. We also have focused channels dedicated to supporting the EPC firms as their needs are often different from those of other customers. The pump and valve markets served are highly competitive. For most of our products there are hundreds of regional competitors and a limited number of larger global peers. We consider our larger competitors to include Flowserve Corporation, Sulzer Pumps, SPX Corporation, Ebara Corporation, The Weir Group PLC, Colfax Corporation, Gemu Valves, Inc., and KSB. Primary customer purchase decision drivers include price, delivery times and on-time delivery performance, brand recognition and reputation, perceived quality, breadth of product offerings, commercial terms, technical support and localization. Pricing is typically very competitive for large projects because of the engineering complexity and increased potential for aftermarket opportunities for the original equipment provider. Our ability to compete is based on having a wide range of engineered industrial pumps designed to meet our customers’ most demanding applications and our capacity to provide customers with an array of after sale services and support. For large projects, our breadth of product offering is an important sales factor as it simplifies the customer’s procurement process. Industrial Process’ ability to expand its product portfolio has been, and is expected to continue to be, a competitive strength. We benefit from our large global installed base of products, which, because of their function in the processes in which they are installed, require frequent maintenance, repair and replacement. The frequency of repair and maintenance services depends on utilization levels, as well as the conditions and environment in which they operate. Our direct and distributor channels provide market leading service to our customers. As we increase the number of our global installations, we will continue to add service centers and personnel. By positioning our facilities close to customers, we are able to provide quicker responses to their growing aftermarket needs. The Industrial Process segment demonstrates ITT’s ability to achieve the Premier Customer Experience because the organization works with its customers over the life cycle of the installation and operation of its products in the customers’ facilities or its customers’ end-users in the case of an EPC firm. Industrial Process is able to accomplish this because of its extensive global customer relationships, breadth of product offering, product availability, project management skills, and aftermarket and reliability services. 7 Motion Technologies Motion Technologies, headquartered in Barge, Italy, is a global manufacturer of highly engineered and durable components, consisting of brake pads, shock absorbers and damping technologies for the transportation industry. The transportation industry encompasses both personal and public transport equipment, such as passenger cars, light and heavy-duty commercial and military vehicles, buses and rail transportation. Motion Technologies consists of two product categories, Friction Technologies and KONI. Friction Technologies provides the automotive market with high- performance, high-quality brake pads, while KONI provides the transportation industry with shock absorber and damping equipment. Motion Technologies primarily serves the high-end of the transportation industry, with a reputation for quality products and a focus on new product development and operational excellence. We believe that Motion Technologies is positioned and structured to benefit from the anticipated global growth in the transportation industry. We believe this growth will be driven by increasing urban and middle class populations especially in emerging markets, creating a significant need for additional mass transit infrastructure and individual desire for automobile ownership. Friction Technologies Our Friction Technologies business applies innovative research of new friction materials and productive technologies to manufacture a range of brake pads installed as OE pads on cars and light and heavy duty commercial vehicles. Our dedication to customers and to the advancement of braking technologies has built a legacy of quality, reliable products that meet the demands of customers across the globe. Demand for Motion Technologies’ products stem from a variety of end customers and automotive platforms around the world. OE pads are sold either directly to OEMs or to Tier-1 and Tier-2 brake manufacturers. Our OE pads are designed to meet customer specifications and environmental regulations, and to satisfy an array of geographic applications. Most automobile OEM platforms (car model) require specific brake pad formulations and have demanding delivery and volume schedules. Friction Technologies manufactures aftermarket brake pads designed for the automotive service and repairs market. This market consists of both OE dealers, also referred to as original equipment spares (OES) networks, and independent aftermarket (AM) networks. Brake pads sold within the OES network generally match the specifications of an original auto platform OE brake pad, while our catalog of AM pads feature technology designed to provide up to a range of braking performance levels. Within the service and repairs market, pads are sold either directly to OE manufacturers or Tier-1 and Tier-2 brake manufacturers (such as Continental or TRW) or indirectly through independent distributor channels. Historically, revenue for Friction Technologies has been generally balanced between OE pads and aftermarket brake pads. Combined sales to Continental and TRW, Motion Technologies' two largest customers, were approximately 40% of 2014 Motion Technologies revenue, however, approximately 20% of this revenue is directly attributable to OES supply agreements signed directly with automakers. In addition, all OE pad contracts are through brake manufacturers even in cases where automakers specify the use of our pads in the braking system. KONI The KONI business organizes its various performance shock absorber products into three main product groups: railway rolling stock; car & racing; and bus, truck & trailer. Each product group is managed by a dedicated team for product development and engineering, manufacturing, and sales & marketing, thus assuring the best possible concentration of product specialization and know-how. Railway Rolling Stock provides a wide range of equipment for passenger rail, locomotives, freight cars, high speed trains and light rail. Offerings include hydraulic shock absorbers (primary, lateral and inter-car), yaw dampers as well as visco-elastic and hydraulic buffers. Revenue opportunities for our rail damping systems are balanced between OE and AM customers. Sales are either directly to train manufacturers and train operators carrying out scheduled train maintenance programs or indirectly through distributors. The rail damping systems market has attractive growth prospects because mass transit systems are benefiting from ongoing large-scale urbanization trends and infrastructure investments. The long-term, enduring nature of these factors fosters a less cyclical market environment. Car & Racing features performance shock absorbers often using our Frequency Selective Damping (FSD) technology. FSD products are used by car and racing enthusiasts who desire to modify their cars for increased handling performance and comfort. KONI car shock absorbers are sold all over the world, through a distribution network that markets KONI products into specific geographies or customer groups. Bus, Truck & Trailer manufactures shock absorbers and bus dampers, destined to both OE and AM customers. Motion Technologies has a market reputation derived from many years of mutual collaboration with major OE manufacturers and is focused on customer satisfaction, quality and on-time delivery. Motion Technologies has a global manufacturing footprint, with production facilities in Western Europe, Eastern Europe and China. 8 Motion Technologies competes in markets primarily served by large, well-established national and global companies. The brake pads and linings market, which we estimate to be approximately $4 billion, includes companies such as Nisshinbo Automotive Corporation, Akebono Brake Corporation, and Federal-Mogul Corporation. Key competitive drivers within the brake pad business include technical expertise, formulation development capabilities, scale production, product performance, high-quality standards, customer intimacy, reputation and the ability to meet demanding delivery and volume schedules in a reduced amount of time. OE and OES customers usually require long- lasting and well-established relationships, based on mutual trust, local proximity and a wide range of cooperative activities, starting from the design to the sampling, prototyping and testing phases of brake pads. Within the independent AM pads market, Motion Technologies is a leading European provider in a highly fragmented global market. Competitive drivers in the rail damping systems business include price, technical expertise and product performance. Rail damping systems are considered critical components because of safety requirements and thus they have to be specifically designed according to many different train applications, and must satisfy strict compliance requirements. We estimate the rail damping systems and bus dampers segments have a combined addressable market of approximately $0.6 billion. Motion Technologies is a global leader in the rail dampers component of the complete rail damper system. Interconnect Solutions Headquartered in Santa Ana, California, Interconnect Solutions (ICS) designs and manufactures a broad range of highly engineered connectors and cable assemblies for critical applications in harsh environments. ICS's product portfolio includes high performance, military-specification, and commercial electrical connectors of the following types: Circular, Rectangular, Radio Frequency, Fiber Optic, D-sub Miniature, Micro-Miniature and cable assemblies. ICS operates through its brands, Cannon, VEAM and BIW Connector Systems, which deliver solutions to enable the transfer of data, signal, and power into four end-user markets: aerospace and defense, transportation and industrial, medical, and oil and gas. ICS has organized its business around these four end-user markets, with each business unit having a dedicated sales, marketing, engineering, operational and finance team that specializes in solutions for their specific market, providing focused customer support and expertise. ICS is considered a leading company in the harsh environment niche markets it participates in, because of its technological capabilities, customer relationships, cost performance and global footprint. Aerospace and Defense The ICS Aerospace and Defense product portfolio includes industry standards-based connectors and customized interconnect solutions for all segments of the commercial aviation and defense industry. These products are designed to withstand the extreme shock, exposure and vibration environments that are typical in aviation and military applications and where reliability and safety are the critical factors. Transportation and Industrial The ICS Transportation product portfolio includes connectors for high-speed, mainline, metro and light passenger rail, and electric vehicle applications. The ICS Industrial product portfolio includes connectors for heavy vehicles, industrial production equipment, industrial electronics and instruments, and other industrial applications. Both markets are served through the Cannon brand, which is celebrating its 100-year anniversary in 2015, and VEAM brand. These brands are known for high-performance, high-reliability solutions which withstand high vibrations and are resistant to dirt and fluids. Medical The ICS Medical product portfolio consists of connectors and customized solutions that provide high-density, high- speed data delivery with ergonomic, miniaturized form factor primarily utilized in the imaging market. Oil and Gas ICS supplies the market primarily with electrical penetrators for oil wells through the BIW Connector Systems brand. Most of these feed-through solutions are used to connect electric submersible pumps (ESPs), downhole instruments and permanent downhole gauges. ICS has a global production footprint, including major facilities in the United States, Mexico, Germany, and China, which provides geographic proximity and the highest level of customer support to over 2,500 global customers. Products are sold either directly to OEM’s, contract manufacturers and cable system operators or indirectly through partnerships with leading distribution companies, creating an extensive global distribution channel. We have long-lasting relationships with our distributor partners, as many have been selling ICS products for over 70 years. Sales to distributors represented approximately 32% of 2014 ICS revenue. We estimate the global market for connectors and related products to be approximately $48 billion in 2014. ICS competes with a large number of competitors in a highly fragmented industry. We estimate our addressable market to 9 be approximately $6 billion in 2014. The major competitors for these products are Amphenol Corporation, Deutsch (TE Connectivity Ltd.), Souriau (Esterline), Harting, and Glenair. Control Technologies Control Technologies, headquartered in Valencia, California, specializes in highly engineered aerospace components and industrial products. We offer an extensive portfolio of qualified products such as fuel management, actuation and noise absorption components in the aerospace market and a range of products that manage motion and absorb energy in a variety of industrial markets. Our application expertise allows us to offer customized solutions using modular platforms that effectively deliver our technologies for various customer applications. We have strong aftermarket opportunities, particularly in our aerospace business, and a broad customer base with no single customer accounting for more than 15% of Control Technologies' revenue through our direct sales channel. In addition, sales to major commercial aircraft manufacturers also regularly occur through third-party distributors. Control Technologies’ distribution network represents approximately 20% of revenue. CT Aerospace CT Aerospace designs and manufactures flow control and actuation components, motion control, energy absorption and vibration isolation products primarily for commercial aerospace, military and other markets. Our products are generally part of long-lived aerospace and defense platforms that provide for recurring aftermarket opportunities. We estimate the served addressable market for CT Aerospace to be approximately $8 billion worldwide. Our aircraft component products consist of fuel and water pumps, valves, electro-mechanical rotary and linear actuators, and pressure, temperature, limit, and flow switches for various aircraft systems. Our aircraft interior products include a variety of engineered elastomer isolators to protect equipment and keep the interior of the aircraft quiet, stowage bin rate controls, rotary hinge dampers and actuators, and seat recline locks and control cables. We also provide electromechanical seat actuation for premium seating products. Defense products generally include energy absorption applications and aerospace components. Most of our products are sold direct to the customer by our in-house sales force. We utilize a small third-party business for government spare parts distribution. CT Aerospace also has a well- established Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) certified repair station which focuses on the aftermarket. The repair station also carries ISO9001/AS9100 and European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) accreditations. Our products are custom designed for specific customer applications. We have a highly skilled engineering group for R&D, application engineering and qualification. We conduct fundamental research internally, with universities, and with our customers. We leverage our technical capability to provide innovative and reliable solutions for our customers. Our flow control and actuation products meet reliability requirements through a unique patented shunt disc technology for pressure and temperature switch applications for hostile environments. In addition, our actuator utilizes a patented optical technology for enhanced reliability. Our pumps have the ability to run dry for extended periods, minimizing potential fire ignition sources in fuel system applications and provide high reliability. Our energy absorption products use patented technology to provide innovative solutions, such as self-compensating valves to allow for wide load variations. Our leading noise/vibration isolation products use patented innovations to improve noise control, reduce weight, and reduce installation time. CT Aerospace sells a wide range of products to the aerospace industry and has many customers globally. Our business is neither dependent on one or a small number of customers. Our customers are predominantly commercial airframe manufacturers, airframe systems manufacturers, interior manufacturers, seat manufacturers, commercial airlines and defense contractors. We have positions with the leading commercial airframe and systems manufacturers such as Boeing, Airbus, B/E Aerospace, Parker-Hannifin, Eaton, Woodward, Safran, and Honeywell. We have significant content in a number of large commercial transport platforms. We also have significant content on regional and business aircrafts. These platforms provide a long life cycle of original equipment and aftermarket sales. In the highly regulated aerospace market, we benefit from our large installed base of products. We compete by offering a wide portfolio of reliable products, coupled with advanced application expertise and customer support. We believe application expertise and our reputation for quality significantly enhance our market position. Our ability to collaborate with our customers to deliver a wide range of product offerings has allowed us to compete effectively, to cultivate and maintain customer relationships, and to expand into new markets. Competitors range from large multi-national corporations to small privately held firms. Our markets are often fragmented and thus there are several types of competitors. CT Aerospace competitors include Circor Aerospace, Inc., Hydra Electric, Lord Corporation, and Hutchinson Worldwide. Competition in these markets focuses on application expertise with effective solutions, product delivery and performance, previous installation history, quality, price and customer support. We have been successful in establishing long-term supply agreements with a number of our larger customers, thereby increasing opportunities to win future business. 10 Given the highly fragmented nature of the aerospace repair & overhaul industry, CT Aerospace competes with a large number of MRO businesses. Some airlines have established repair and overhaul capabilities which makes them competitors as well. We compete in the repair and overhaul segment of our business by offering a high quality service with increased reliability, coupled with advanced technical expertise. CT Industrial CT Industrial designs and manufactures energy absorption, precision motion control, and natural gas regulators, primarily for the automation, heavy industry, infrastructure, and oil and gas markets. We estimate the served addressable market for CT Industrial is approximately $3 billion globally. CT Industrial possesses a specialized set of skills and capabilities that enables us to engineer custom solutions for unique applications. Our energy absorption products consist of customized shocks absorbers, vibration isolators and dampers. Our precision motion control products consist of servomotors, actuators, and controllers. CT Industrial has solid positions in China, Europe, and North America. It has a broad customer base including end-users, OEM’s, and distributors. Channels to market include direct, commissioned representation and buy-resell distributors. Our ability to collaborate with our customers to deliver comprehensive product offerings has allowed us to compete effectively against our competitors. Competitors change depending on the product line and range from large multi-national corporations to small privately held firms. The energy absorption, precision motion control and natural gas regulators businesses are highly fragmented and we compete with a global group of industry participants. The main competitors in the energy absorption infrastructure and automation market are Taylor Devices and ACE (a subsidiary of Kaydon, an SKF Group company). The main competitor in the servomotor product line is Kollmorgen. Parker-Hannifin Corporation is a leading competitor in the pneumatic actuation market. CT Industrial will continue to focus on delivery lead times, quality and performance while enhancing our application engineering offering. The development of new customer service strategies will create a differentiated service offering and improve turnaround time in product, quotations and service communications. Other Company Information Materials All of our businesses require various OEM products, manufactured components and raw materials, the availability and prices of which may fluctuate. The principal OEM products and manufactured components assembled into our products include motors, castings, mechanical seals, machined castings, metal fabrications and miscellaneous metal, plastic, or electronic components. The primary raw materials used in manufacturing our products include steel, gold, copper, nickel, iron, aluminum, and tin, as well as specialty alloys, including titanium. Materials are purchased in various forms, such as sheet, bar, rod and wire stock, pellets and metal powders. Our global sourcing initiatives continue to expand and are designed to capitalize on sources in emerging growth markets and other low-cost sources of purchased goods balanced with efficient coordinated global logistics. Raw materials, supplies and product subassemblies are purchased from third-party suppliers, contract manufacturers, and commodity dealers. For most of our products, we have existing alternate sources of supply, or such materials are readily available. In some instances we depend on a single source of supply, manufacturing or assembly or participate in commodity markets that may be subject to a limited number of suppliers. We continually monitor the business conditions of our supply chain to maintain our market position and to avoid potential supply disruptions. There have been no raw materials shortages that have had a material adverse impact on our business as a whole, and we have been able to develop a robust supply chain such that we do not anticipate shortages of such materials in the future. Although some cost increases may be recovered through increased prices to customers, our operating results are generally exposed to such fluctuations. We attempt to control such costs through fixed-priced contracts with suppliers and various other cost containment strategies, such as our Global Indirect Services initiative. We typically acquire materials and components through a combination of blanket and scheduled purchase orders to support our materials requirements for an average of four to eight weeks, with the exception of some specialty materials. From time to time, we experience price volatility or supply constraints for raw materials based on market supply and demand dynamics. In limited circumstances, we may have to obtain scarce components for higher prices on the spot market, which may have a negative impact on gross margin and can periodically create a disruption to production and delivery. We also acquire certain inventory in anticipation of supply constraints or enter into longer-term pricing commitments with vendors to improve the priority, price and availability of supply. We evaluate hedging opportunities to mitigate or minimize the risk of operating margin erosion resulting from the volatility of commodity prices. 11 Manufacturing Methods We utilize two primary methods of fulfilling demand for products: build-to-order and engineer-to-order. Build-to- order consists of assembling a group of products with the same pre-defined specifications, generally for our OEM customers. Engineer-to-order consists of assembling a customized system for a customer’s individual order specifications. In both cases, we offer design, integration, test and other production value-added services. We employ build-to-order capabilities to maximize manufacturing and logistics efficiencies by producing high volumes of basic product configurations. Engineering products to order permits the configuration of units to meet the customized requirements of our customers. Our inventory management and distribution practices in both build-to-order and engineer-to-order seek to minimize inventory holding periods, and improve customer delivery performance. Backlog Delivery schedules vary from customer to customer based on their requirements. For example, large complex projects in specialized markets such as oil and gas and mining at Industrial Process require longer lead times and production cycles. Delivery delays could arise from supply chain limitations, internal production challenges, changes in the customer’s requirements, or technical difficulties. Total backlog, representing firm orders that have been received, acknowledged and entered into our production systems, was $1,025 and $1,093 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total backlog at December 31, 2014 was comprised of 60% from Industrial Process, 20% from Motion Technologies, 11% from ICS, and 9% from Control Technologies. We expect to satisfy nearly all December 31, 2014 backlog commitments during 2015. Intellectual Property We generally seek patent protection for those inventions and improvements that are likely to be incorporated into our products or where proprietary rights are expected to improve our competitive position. The highly customized application engineering embedded within our products, our proprietary rights and our knowledge capabilities all contribute to enhancing our competitive position. While we own and control a significant number of patents, trade secrets, confidential information, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, and other intellectual property rights which, in the aggregate, are of material importance to our business, management believes that our Company, as a whole, as well as each of our core segments, is not materially dependent on any one intellectual property right or related group of such rights. Patents, patent applications, and license agreements will expire or terminate over time by operation of law, in accordance with their terms or otherwise. As the portfolio of our patents, patent applications, and license agreements has evolved over a long period of time, we do not expect the expiration of any specific patent or other intellectual property right to have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Research and Development R&D is a key element of ITT’s engineering culture and is generally focused on the design and development of products and solutions that anticipate customer needs and emerging trends. Our approach to R&D often begins by working with our customers to address a problem, then engineering a solution to the particular customer need. As a result, our R&D is based on taking technology quickly to the tangible phase, increasing the competitive offering, and increasing the customer service experience through engineered application solutions. Research and development efforts at Industrial Process focus on robust solutions for our customer’s most difficult problems. The Medium Voltage PumpSmart Product line for the advanced control of critical pumping systems is an example of a life cycle cost solution for difficult applications. This successful innovation relies on the tight integration of key pump knowledge, electronics and software. Industrial Process has continued to expand the range of our high pressure, high temperature and multiphase products in various engineered and industrial applications. A new line of very high flow pump sizes has been released for applications in power and other industrial applications. Industrial Process has continued to extend our mining pump and valve portfolio which has been designed for the toughest applications. Industrial Process has also introduced a state of the art line of hygienic valves for the pharmaceutical and hygienic industries that brings many innovative features and benefits to our customers. Motion Technologies' R&D activities focus on the design and development of products and solutions that either meet specific customers’ needs or anticipate new market trends and environmental regulations. For example, Motion Technologies tackled new regulatory challenges concerning the use of copper and became the first friction manufacturer to provide copper-free brake pads for commercial vehicle applications. This successful formulation relied on both product innovation as well as innovative processes in thermal treatment. Motion Technologies continues to invest in its R&D centers around the world to enable ITT to provide the appropriate engineering solutions with responsive service to our customers and for the development of new local product launches. ICS focuses its research and development on creating product solutions that address reduced size, weight and cost requirements; environmental standards compliance; and a general expansion of its existing product lines. A recent 12 example is the new series of lightweight Cannon Micro-D connectors that are capable of carrying 802.11n wireless transmission frequencies in a Micro-D package enabling enhanced wireless connectivity for passengers in-flight. The Micro-D design addresses the minimal space requirement standards, while easily integrating with related applications, providing the ability to maintain connection and endure in the harshest shock and vibration environments. Control Technologies' R&D efforts are aimed at producing innovative technologies that solve our customer’s critical issues. For example, CT Industrial is currently developing a series of high pressure fluid viscous dampers to protect building and bridges from seismic events. In addition, CT Aerospace is developing vibration isolators for rotorcrafts to reduce noise and vibration, and a portfolio of valves and actuators for high flow fuel systems. We anticipate our investments in future R&D activities will moderately increase from current spending levels to ensure a continuing flow of innovative, high quality products and maintain our competitive position in the markets we serve. Such activities are conducted in laboratory and engineering facilities at several of our major manufacturing locations, as well as in our dedicated R&D facilities strategically positioned close to our customers. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, we recognized R&D expenses of $76.6, $67.3, and $62.7, respectively, which were 2.9%, 2.7%, and 2.8%, of revenues, respectively. Cyclicality and Seasonality Many of the businesses in which we operate are subject to specific industry and general economic cycles. We consider our connectors business to be an early cycle business, meaning it generally is impacted more in the early portion of an economic cycle, while the automotive and aerospace components businesses tend to be impacted in the middle portion of the cycle and the industrial pump business typically is impacted late in the economic cycle. Our businesses experience limited seasonal variations, with demand generally at an annual low during summer months (our third quarter) mainly attributable to manufacturing shutdowns and the planned industrial maintenance activities of our customers. Revenue impacts from the limited seasonal variations are typically mitigated by our backlog of orders that allow us to adjust levels of production across the summer months. Environmental Matters We are subject to stringent federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations concerning air emissions, water discharges and waste disposal. In the U.S., these include, but are not limited to, the Federal Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. Environmental requirements are significant factors affecting our operations. We have established an internal program to assess compliance with applicable environmental requirements for our facilities. The program, which includes periodic audits of many of our locations, including our major operating facilities, is designed to identify problems in a timely manner, correct deficiencies and prevent future noncompliance. We closely monitor our environmental responsibilities, together with trends in the environmental laws. In addition, we have purchased insurance protection against certain environmental risks arising from our business activities. Environmental laws and regulations are subject to change, however, the nature and timing of such changes, if any, is difficult to predict. As actual costs incurred at identified sites in future periods may vary from our current estimates given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, management believes it is possible that the outcome of these uncertainties may have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. See "Critical Accounting Estimates" within Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, as well as Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding environmental matters. Employees As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 9,400 employees, of which approximately 3,300 were located in the U.S. Approximately 15% of our U.S. employees are represented by unions. We also have unionized employees in Italy, Germany, and Brazil. No one unionized facility accounts for more than 17% of ITT total revenues. Although our relations with our employees are strong and we have not experienced any material strikes or work stoppages recently, no assurances can be made that we will not experience these or other types of conflicts with labor unions, works councils, other groups representing employees or our employees generally, or that any future negotiations with our labor unions will not result in significant increases in our cost of labor. 13 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS We are subject to a wide range of factors that could materially affect future developments and performance. Because of these factors, past performance may not be a reliable indicator of future results. Set forth below and elsewhere in this document are descriptions of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this document. The most significant factors affecting our business and operations include the following: Business and Operating Risks Our exposure to pending and future asbestos claims and related liabilities, assets, and cash flows is subject to significant uncertainties. ITT, including its subsidiary Goulds Pumps, Inc., has been sued, along with many other companies, in numerous lawsuits in which the plaintiffs claim damages for personal injury arising from exposure to asbestos from component parts of certain products sold or distributed by various defendants, including the Company. We expect to be sued in similar actions in the future. We record an estimated liability related to pending claims and claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years based on a number of key assumptions, including the plaintiffs’ propensity to sue, claim acceptance rates, disease type, settlement values and defense costs. These assumptions are derived from ITT’s recent experience and reflect the Company’s expectations about future claim activities. These assumptions about the future may or may not prove accurate, and accordingly, the Company may incur additional liabilities in the future. A change in one or more of the inputs used to estimate our asbestos liability could materially change the estimated liability and associated cash flows for pending claims and those estimated to be filed in the next 10 years. Although it is probable that the Company will incur additional costs for asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, we do not believe that there is a reasonable basis for estimating those costs at this time. We record an asset that represents our best estimate of probable recoveries from our insurers for the estimated asbestos liabilities. There are significant assumptions made in developing estimates of asbestos-related recoveries, such as policy triggers, policy or contract interpretation, the methodology for allocating claims to policies, and the continued solvency of the Company’s insurers. Certain of our primary coverage-in-place agreements are exhausted which may result in higher net cash outflows until excess carriers begin accepting claims for reimbursement. Performance by our insurers could differ from the assumptions underlying the recognized asset and could result in lower collections of receivables than are currently expected to reduce the Company’s asbestos costs. Due to these uncertainties, as well as our inability to reasonably estimate any additional asbestos liability for claims that may be filed beyond the next 10 years, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of the cost, nor potential recoveries, of resolving the pending and all unasserted asbestos claims. Additionally, we believe it is possible that the cost of asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, net of expected recoveries, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Many uncertainties exist surrounding asbestos litigation. The Company will continue to evaluate its estimated asbestos-related liability and corresponding estimated insurance reimbursement, as well as the underlying assumptions and process used to derive these amounts. Changes in estimates related to these uncertainties may result in increases or decreases to the net asbestos liability, particularly if the quality or number of claims or settlement or defense costs change significantly, if there are significant developments in the trend of case law or court procedures, or if legislation or another alternative solution is implemented; however, the Company is currently unable to predict such future changes or estimate their potential effect on its net asbestos liability. Although the resolution of asbestos claims may take many years, the effect of changes in our estimates related to our pending or estimated future claims in any given period could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, as part of the Distribution, ITT indemnified Exelis and Xylem with respect to asserted and unasserted asbestos claims that relate to the presence or alleged presence of asbestos in products manufactured, repaired or sold prior to the Distribution Date, subject to limited exceptions. 14 Our operating results and our ability to maintain liquidity or procure capital may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and capital market conditions associated with global sales and operations and the uncertain geopolitical environment. Adverse conditions in the markets we serve could adversely affect demand for our products. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience fluctuations in revenues and operating results due to economic and business cycles. Important factors impacting our businesses include the overall strength of the global economy and our customers’ confidence in local and global macroeconomic conditions, industrial spending, interest rates, availability of commercial financing for our customers and unemployment rates. We serve a diverse mix of customers in global infrastructure industries which can be volatile. The markets in which our businesses operate include automotive, aerospace, oil and gas, industrial, mining, chemical and defense, each of which is impacted by specific industry and general economic cycles. Our revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the past and may vary from quarter to quarter in the future and can be negatively impacted by volatility in the end markets we serve. We have undertaken measures to reduce the impact of this volatility through diversification of markets we serve and expansion of geographic regions in which we operate. We may be adversely affected by disruptions in financial markets or downturns in macroeconomic conditions in specific countries or regions, or in the various industries in which the Company operates or be subject to adverse changes in the availability and cost of capital, interest rates, tax rates, or regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Our international operations, including U.S. exports, comprise a growing portion of our operations and are a strategic focus for continued future growth. Our strategy calls for increasing sales in overseas markets, including emerging growth markets such as Central and South America, China, Russia, India, Venezuela, and the Middle East. In 2014, 65% of our total sales were to customers operating outside of the United States. Both our sales from international operations and export sales are subject in varying degrees to risks inherent to doing business outside of the United States. These risks include the following: • possibility of unfavorable circumstances arising from host country laws or regulations; • currency exchange rate fluctuations and restrictions on currency repatriation; • potential negative consequences from changes to taxation policies; • the disruption of operations from labor and political disturbances; • our ability to hire and maintain qualified staff in these regions; and • changes in tariff and trade barriers and import and export licensing requirements. Instability in the global credit markets, including the ongoing European economic and financial difficulties in certain countries and the instability in the geopolitical environment in many parts of the world, may continue to put pressure on global economic conditions. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in key markets, deteriorate further we may experience material impacts on our financial statements. Adverse changes to financial conditions could jeopardize certain counterparty obligations, including those of our insurers and customers. Restrictive credit markets may also result in customers extending terms for payment and may result in our having higher customer receivables with increased risk of default. We closely monitor the credit worthiness of our insurers and customers and evaluate their ability to service their obligations to us. A tightening of credit markets may reduce funds available to our customers to pay for or buy our products and services for an unknown, but perhaps lengthy, period. Should market conditions deteriorate, this may adversely affect our ability to manage inventory levels and maintain current levels of profitability. If, for any reason, we lose access to our currently available lines of credit, or if we are required to raise additional capital, we may be unable to do so or we may be able to do so only on unfavorable terms. We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly with respect to the Euro, Chinese renminbi, South Korean won, Hong Kong dollar, Mexican peso, British pound, Czech koruna, Australian dollar, Brazilian real, Canadian dollar, and Russian ruble. In addition, the Company is exposed to the Venezuelan bolivar, which it ceased using as the functional currency of its Venezuelan operations in 2010. As we continue to grow our business internationally, our operating results could be affected by the relative strength of the European, Asian and developing economies and the impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations. Any significant change in the value of currencies of the countries in which we do business relative to the value of the U.S. dollar could affect our ability to sell products competitively and control our cost structure, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Accordingly, fluctuations in exchange rates may also impact our results when financial statements of non-U.S. operating units are translated into U.S. dollars. Given that the majority of our sales are non- 15 U.S. based, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against other major foreign currencies could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition to the general risks that we face outside the U.S., we now conduct more of our operations in emerging growth markets than we have in the past, which could involve additional uncertainties, including risks that governments may impose limitations on our ability to repatriate funds; governments may impose withholding or other taxes on remittances and other payments to us, or the amount of any such taxes may increase; governments may seek to nationalize our assets; or governments may impose or increase investment barriers or other restrictions affecting our business. In addition, emerging growth markets pose other uncertainties, including the protection of our intellectual property, pressure on the pricing of our products, and risks of political instability. A substantial portion of our earnings is generated by our foreign subsidiaries and repatriation of those earnings to the U.S. may be inefficient from a tax perspective. Any distributions, loans or advances to us by our foreign subsidiaries could be subject to taxation under applicable local law, monetary transfer restrictions and foreign currency exchange regulations in the jurisdictions in which our subsidiaries operate. The cost of compliance with increasingly complex and often conflicting regulations worldwide can also impair our flexibility in modifying product, marketing, pricing, or other strategies for growing our businesses, as well as our ability to improve productivity and maintain acceptable profit margins. Our business is impacted by our customer's levels of capital investment and maintenance expenditures. Demand for our industrial products and services depends on the level of capital investment and planned maintenance expenditures of our customers. Our customers' levels of capital expenditures depends, in turn, on general economic conditions, availability of credit, economic conditions within their respective industries and expectations of future market behavior. Additionally, volatility in commodity prices can negatively affect the level of these activities and can result in postponement of capital spending decisions or the delay or cancellation of existing orders. The ability of our customers to finance capital investment and maintenance may also be affected by factors independent of the conditions in their industries, such as the condition of global credit and capital markets. The businesses of many of our customers, particularly oil and gas companies, chemical companies, mining companies and industrial companies are to varying degrees cyclical and have experienced, or may experience, periodic downturns. Our customers in these industries, particularly those whose demand for our products and services is primarily profit-driven, historically have tended to delay large capital projects, including expensive maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. Additionally, fluctuating energy demand forecasts and lingering uncertainty concerning commodity pricing can cause our customers to be more conservative in their capital planning, which may reduce demand for our products and services. Reduced demand for our products and services could result in the delay or cancellation of existing orders or lead to excess manufacturing capacity, which unfavorably impacts our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs. This reduced demand may also erode average selling prices in our industry. Any of these results could adversely affect our business and financial results. Additionally, some of our industrial products customers may choose to delay capital investment and maintenance, even during favorable conditions in their industries or markets. Despite these favorable conditions, the general health of global credit and capital markets and our customers' ability to access such markets may significantly impact investments in large capital projects, as well as necessary maintenance and upgrades. In addition, the liquidity and financial position of our customers, which is typically directly linked to the economies in which they operate, could impact capital investment decisions and their ability to pay in full and/or on a timely basis. Any of these factors, whether individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our customers and, in turn, our business and financial results. Failure to compete successfully in our markets could adversely affect our business. We provide products and services to competitive markets. We believe the principal points of competition in our markets are product performance, reliability and innovation, application expertise, brand reputation, energy efficiency, product life cycle cost, timeliness of delivery, proximity of service centers, effectiveness of our distribution channels and price. Maintaining and improving our competitive position will require continued investment by us in manufacturing, research and development, engineering, marketing, customer service and support, and our distribution networks. We may not be successful in maintaining our competitive position. Our competitors may develop products that are superior to our products, or may develop more efficient or effective methods of providing products and services or may adapt more quickly than we do to new technologies or evolving customer requirements. Pricing pressures also could cause us to adjust the prices of certain products to stay competitive. We may not be able to compete successfully with existing or new competitors. Risks such as these are particularly apparent in our ICS business, which relies on innovation to stay competitive. 16 Our operating costs are subject to fluctuations, particularly due to changes in commodity prices, raw materials, energy and related utilities, freight, and cost of labor. In order to remain competitive, we may not be able to recoup all or a portion of these higher costs from our customers through product price increases. Further, our ability to realize financial benefits from Lean Six Sigma activities may not be able to mitigate fully or in part these manufacturing and operating cost increases and, as a result, could negatively impact our profitability. Quality problems with our manufacturing processes or finished goods could harm our reputation for producing high-quality products and erode our competitive advantage, sales, and market share. We manufacture key components that are integral to the operation of systems and manufacturing processes in the energy, transportation and industrial markets. Our products provide enabling functionality for applications where reliability and performance are critically important to our customers and the users of their products. As such, quality is extremely important to us and our customers due to the serious and costly consequences of product failure. Our quality certifications are critical to the marketing success of our goods and services. If we fail to meet these standards, our reputation could be damaged, we could lose customers, and our revenue and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Aside from specific customer standards, our success in part depends on our ability to manufacture to exact tolerances precision-engineered components, subassemblies, and finished devices from multiple materials. If our components fail to meet these standards or fail to adapt to evolving standards, our reputation as a manufacturer of high-quality components will be harmed, our competitive advantage could be damaged, and we could lose customers and market share. Our business exposes us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in the design, manufacture, and marketing of products for the markets we serve. In addition, many of the devices we manufacture and sell are designed to be used in harsh environments for long periods of time where the cost of failure is high. Component failures, manufacturing defects, design flaws, or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks or product-related information could result in an unsafe condition or injury to, or death of, an end-user of our products. The occurrence of such a problem could result in product liability claims or a recall of, or safety alert relating to, one or more of our products which could ultimately result, in certain cases, in the removal of such products from the marketplace and claims regarding costs associated therewith. Product liability claims or product recalls in the future, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation and on our ability to attract and retain customers for our products. Our business could be adversely affected by raw material price volatility and the inability of suppliers to meet quality and delivery requirements. Our business relies on third-party suppliers for raw materials, components, and contract manufacturing services to produce our products. The supply of raw materials to the Company and to its component parts suppliers and the supply of castings, motors, and other critical components could be interrupted for a variety of reasons, including availability and pricing. Prices for raw materials necessary for production have fluctuated significantly in the past and significant increases could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and profit margins. Due to pricing pressure or other factors, the Company may not be able to pass along increased raw material and components parts prices to its customers in the form of price increases or its ability to do so could be delayed. Consequently, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. For most of our products, we have existing alternate sources of supply, or such materials are readily available. In some instances we depend on a single source of supply, manufacturing or assembly or participate in commodity markets that may be subject to a limited number of suppliers. Delays in obtaining supplies may result from a number of factors affecting our suppliers, including production interruptions at suppliers, capacity constraints, labor disputes, the impaired financial condition of a particular supplier, the ability of suppliers to meet regulatory requirements, and suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers. Any delay in our suppliers’ abilities to provide us with sufficient quality and flow of materials, price increases, or decreased availability of raw materials or commodities could impair our ability to deliver products to our customers and, accordingly, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position. Our business could be adversely affected by the inability of suppliers to provide us with certifications relating to conflict minerals. Since our supply chain is complex, ultimately we may not be able to sufficiently discover the origin of the conflict minerals (generally defined as the minerals tin, tantalum, titanium and gold which have been extracted from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or adjoining countries) used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may adversely affect our reputation with our customers, shareholders, and other stakeholders. In such event, we may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who require that all of our products are certified as conflict mineral free. If we are not able to meet such requirements, customers may choose not to purchase our products, which could adversely affect our sales and the value of portions of our inventory. Further, there may be only a limited 17 number of suppliers offering conflict free minerals and, as a result, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain metals, if necessary, from such suppliers in sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Any one or a combination of these various factors could harm our business, reduce market demand for our products, and adversely affect our financial results. If we fail to manage the distribution of our products and services effectively, our revenue, gross margin and profitability could suffer. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from a single customer. We use a variety of sales channels to sell our products and services. Successfully managing these sales channels is a complex process as we sell a broad mix of products through a network of over 800 distributors, agents, and value- added resellers. Moreover, since each distribution method has distinct risks and profit margins, our failure to implement the most advantageous balance in the delivery model for our products and services could adversely affect our revenue and profit margins. In addition, changes to the sales channels could introduce additional complexity to the sales and inventory management processes and could cause disruptions to customer service or create channel conflicts. Further, we must manage inventory effectively, particularly with respect to sales to distributors, which involves forecasting demand and potential pricing issues. Distributors may increase orders during periods of product shortages, cancel orders if their inventory is too high or delay orders in anticipation of new products. Our reliance on indirect distribution methods may reduce visibility to end-customer demand, generating a time lag to the market trend with potential negative impacts on strategic decisions, including pricing and operational decisions. Our financial results could be adversely affected by the loss of a distributor, the loss or deterioration of some distribution or reseller arrangements, channel conflicts including the consolidation of third-party distributors, or if the financial conditions of our channel partners were to weaken. It is not unreasonable to suspect that some of our distributors may have insufficient financial resources and may not be able to withstand changes in business conditions, including economic weakness, leading to a slowness or difficulty in the cash collection process. A significant portion of our total revenue (and a significant portion of the revenue of our Motion Technologies segment) is derived from a single customer, whom we sell to through OE pad contracts and OES supply agreements with automakers and which is also a third-party distributor for us in the independent aftermarket channel. Changes in our effective tax rates as a result of changes in the realizability of our deferred tax assets, the geographic mix of earnings, tax examinations or disputes, tax authority rulings, or changes in the tax laws, may adversely affect our financial results. The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and in various foreign jurisdictions. We exercise significant judgment in calculating our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Furthermore, changes in domestic or foreign income tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation, could result in higher or lower income tax rates assessed or changes in the taxability of certain income or the deductibility of certain expenses, thereby affecting our income tax expense and profitability. Any significant increase in our future effective tax rates could reduce net income for future periods. Given the global nature of our business, a number of factors may increase our future effective tax rates, including: • decisions to repatriate non-U.S. earnings for which we have not previously provided for U.S. income taxes; • changes in the geographic mix of our profits among jurisdictions with differing statutory income tax rates; • sustainability of historical income tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we conduct business; • changes in tax laws applicable to us; • expiration, renewal, or application of tax holidays; • the resolution of issues arising from tax audits with various tax authorities; and • changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets, deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax asset valuation allowances. The amount of income taxes and other taxes we have paid are subject to ongoing audits by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities and by non-U.S. authorities. If these audits result in assessments different from amounts paid or reserved, future financial results may include unfavorable tax adjustments. We are currently under routine examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, and we may be subject to additional examinations in the future. The tax authorities may disagree with our tax treatment of certain material items and thereby increase our tax liability. Failure to sustain our position in these matters could result in a material adverse effect on our financial statements. 18 Failure to retain our existing senior management, engineering and other key personnel or the inability to attract and retain new qualified personnel could negatively impact our ability to operate or grow our business. Our success will continue to depend to a significant extent on our ability to retain or attract a significant number of employees in senior management, engineering and other key personnel. The ability to attract or retain employees will depend on our ability to offer competitive compensation, training and cultural benefits. We will need to continue to develop a roster of qualified talent to support business growth and replace departing employees. A failure to retain or attract highly skilled personnel could adversely affect our operating results or ability to operate or grow our business. Our current information systems structure and applications may pose certain risks. Our information systems infrastructure is centralized, but our information system applications are both centralized and decentralized. The centralized infrastructure presents a risk in that a potential security breach could have a company-wide impact. The decentralized applications could result in significant replacement costs were the Company to decide to replace a number of the independent operating systems or consolidate operating systems. The inter- relationship of information systems also presents an additional risk when upgrading or replacing information systems. Additionally, our planned initiative to upgrade or replace existing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems over the next several years was launched during 2014. Implementing new systems may result in unintended changes to the way in which production is performed and transactions are processed. Our ability to execute these ERP systems implementations will directly impact our potential risk exposure during this implementation period. Security breaches could adversely affect our business and results of operations. The efficient operation of our business is dependent on computer hardware and software systems. While we believe we have taken many steps to protect our information systems, even the most well-protected information systems are vulnerable to internal and external security breaches including those by computer hackers and cyber terrorists. Furthermore, information technology security threats are increasing in sophistication and frequency. While we actively manage the risks to our information systems that are within our control, we can provide no assurance that our actions will be successful in eliminating or mitigating risks to our systems, networks and data. The unavailability of our information systems, the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated for any reason or any significant breach of security could cause significant disruption to our business and could result in decreased performance and increased overhead costs, causing an adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. A breach could also result in the loss of our intellectual property, potentially impacting our long-term capability to compete on sales for affected products. In addition, a breach of security of our information systems could result in litigation, regulatory action and potential liability, as well as increased costs to implement further information security measures. Portfolio management strategies for growth, including cost-saving initiatives, may not meet expectations. We regularly review our portfolio of businesses and pursue growth through the acquisition of other companies, assets and product lines that either complement or expand our existing business. Although we conduct what we believe to be a prudent level of investigation regarding the operating and financial condition of the businesses we purchase, a level of risk remains regarding the actual operating condition of these businesses. Until we actually assume operating control of these business assets and their operations, we may not be able to ascertain the actual value or understand the potential liabilities of the acquired entities and their operations. Acquisitions involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges that could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business, including that an acquired business could under-perform relative to our expectations, the failure to realize expected synergies, integration of technology, operations, personnel and financial and other systems, the possibility that we have acquired substantial undisclosed liabilities, potentially insufficient internal controls over financial activities or financial reporting at an acquired company that could impact us on a consolidated basis, diversion of management attention from other businesses, loss of key employees of the acquired businesses, and customer dissatisfaction or performance. Our portfolio reviews also include the potential for cost-saving initiatives through restructuring, realignment and other initiatives. We strive for and expect to achieve cost savings in connection with certain initiatives, including: (i) manufacturing process and supply chain rationalization; (ii) streamlining redundant administrative overhead and support activities; and (iii) restructuring and repositioning organizations. Cost savings expectations are inherently estimates that are difficult to predict and we cannot provide assurance that we will achieve expected, or any, actual cost savings. Our restructuring activities may place substantial demands on our management, which could lead to the diversion of management’s attention from other business priorities and result in a reduced customer focus. 19 The level of returns on postretirement benefit plan assets, changes in interest rates and other factors could affect our earnings and cash flows in future periods. A portion of our current and retired employee population is covered by pension and other employee-related defined benefit plans (collectively, postretirement benefit plans). We may experience significant fluctuations in costs related to postretirement benefit plans as a result of macroeconomic factors, such as interest rates, that are beyond our control. The cost of our postretirement plans is incurred over long periods of time and involves various factors and uncertainties during those periods, which can be volatile and unpredictable, including the rates of return on postretirement benefit plan assets and discount rates used to calculate liabilities and expenses. Management develops each assumption using relevant Company experience in conjunction with market-related data. Our liquidity, cash flows and financial statements could be materially affected by significant changes in key economic indicators, volatility in the financial markets, future legislation and other governmental regulatory actions. We make contributions to fund our postretirement benefit plans when considered necessary or advantageous to do so. The macro-economic factors discussed above, including the return on postretirement benefit plan assets and the minimum funding requirements established by local government funding or taxing authorities, or established by other agreements, may influence future funding requirements. A significant decline in the fair value of our plan assets, or other adverse changes to our overall pension and other employee-related benefit plans could require increased funding contributions and could adversely affect our financial statements. Future minimum funding requirements will depend primarily on the return on plan assets and discount rate. Depending on these factors, the level of future minimum contributions could be material. Other Risks, Including Litigation and Regulatory Risk Changes in environmental laws or regulations, the discovery of previously unknown or more extensive contamination, or the failure of a potentially responsible party to perform may adversely affect our financial results. We could be affected by changes in environmental laws or regulations, including, for example, those imposed in response to vapor intrusion or climate change concerns. Environmental laws and regulations allow for the assessment of substantial fines and criminal sanctions as well as facility shutdowns to address violations, and may require the installation of costly pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit emissions or discharges. Accruals for environmental liabilities are recorded on a site-by-site basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. Our estimated liability is undiscounted and is reduced to reflect the participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective share of the relevant costs. Such estimates are subject to change and may be affected by many factors, such as new information about a site, evolving scientific knowledge about risk associated with any contamination involved, developments affecting remediation technology, and enforcement by regulatory authorities. We record an asset that represents our best estimate of probable recoveries from our insurers for the estimated environmental liabilities. There are significant assumptions made in developing estimates of environmental-related recoveries, such as policy triggers, policy or contract interpretation, and the continued solvency of the Company’s insurers. Performance by our insurers could differ from the assumptions underlying the recognized asset and could result in lower collections of receivables than are currently expected. Developments such as the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations, violations by us of such laws and regulations, discovery of previously unknown or more extensive contamination, litigation involving environmental impacts, our inability to recover costs associated with any such developments, or financial insolvency of other potentially responsible parties could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or other applicable anti-corruption legislation, as well as export controls and trade sanctions, could result in fines or criminal penalties. We operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities, or the respective officers, directors, employees and agents of ITT, may take action determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including but not limited to, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 and the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, as well as trade sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely 20 affect our business, results of operations or financial position. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management. We are subject to laws, regulations and potential liability relating to claims, complaints and proceedings, including those related to product and other matters. We are subject to various laws, ordinances, regulations and other requirements of government authorities in the U.S. and in foreign countries. Any violations or failure to comply with securities laws, trade or tax rules or similar regulations could create a substantial liability for us, and also could cause harm to our reputation. Changes in laws, ordinances, regulations or other government policies, the nature, timing, and effect of which are uncertain, may significantly increase our expenses and liabilities. From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these proceedings allege damages relating to product liability, personal injury claims, employment and employee benefit matters and commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to acquisitions or divestitures. Additionally, we may become subject to significant claims of which we are currently unaware or the claims of which we are aware may result in our incurring a significantly greater liability than we anticipate or can estimate. We may be responsible for U.S. Federal income tax liabilities that relate to the Distribution. In connection with the Distribution, we received a U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Ruling stating that ITT and its shareholders will not recognize any taxable income, gain, or loss for U.S. Federal income tax purposes as a result of the Distribution. The IRS Ruling, while generally binding upon the IRS, is based on certain factual statements and representations we made to the IRS. If any such factual statements or representations were incomplete or untrue in any material respect, or if the facts on which the IRS Ruling was based are materially different from the facts at the time of the Distribution, the IRS could modify or revoke the IRS Ruling retroactively. Certain requirements for tax-free treatment that are not covered in the IRS Ruling are addressed in an opinion of counsel delivered in connection with the Distribution. An opinion of counsel is not binding on the IRS. Accordingly, the IRS may reach conclusions with respect to the Distribution that are different from the conclusions reached in the opinion. Like the IRS Ruling, the opinion is based on certain factual statements and representations, which, if incomplete or untrue in any material respect, could alter counsel’s conclusions. If all or a portion of the Distribution does not qualify as a tax-free transaction because any of the factual statements or representations in the IRS Ruling or the legal opinion are incomplete or untrue, or because the facts upon which the IRS Ruling is based are materially different from the facts at the time of the Distribution, ITT would recognize a substantial gain for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In such case, under U.S. Treasury regulations, each member of the ITT consolidated group at the time of the Distribution would be severally liable for the resulting entire amount of any U.S. Federal income tax liability. The Distribution may expose us to potential liabilities. In connection with the Distribution we may be exposed to potential liabilities. As part of the Distribution Agreement, ITT, Exelis, and Xylem indemnified each other with respect to such parties’ assumed or retained liabilities pursuant to the Distribution Agreement and breaches of the Distribution Agreement or related spin agreements. There can be no assurance that the indemnity from Exelis and Xylem will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of these and other liabilities, or that each of Exelis and Xylem will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Third-parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that each of Exelis and Xylem has agreed to assume. Even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from Exelis and/or Xylem any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. In addition, performance on indemnities that we provided Exelis and Xylem may be significant. Each of these risks could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial position. Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Indiana law could delay or prevent a change in control. Certain provisions of our articles of incorporation and by-laws may delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a shareholder may consider favorable. For example, the articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock. In addition, the articles of incorporation and by-laws, among other things, do not permit action by written consent of the shareholders. These provisions may also discourage acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control, which could harm our stock price. Indiana law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between any holder of 10% or more of our outstanding common stock and us as well as certain restrictions on the voting rights of “control shares” of an “issuing public corporation.” 21 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES We consider the offices, plants, warehouses, and other properties that we own or lease to be in good condition and generally suitable for their intended purpose. We believe these properties are adequate for the Company’s needs and will generally allow for expansion of capacity if needed. The following table summarizes the number and area (in thousands of square feet) of our properties by region and business segment. Location Manufacturing: North America Europe Middle East Asia Latin America Non-Manufacturing: North America Europe Middle East Asia Latin America Location Manufacturing: North America Europe Middle East Asia Latin America Non-Manufacturing: North America Europe Middle East Asia Latin America Number of Facilities - Owned Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Other Total # Area # Area # Area # Area # Area # Area 3 2 — 1 2 8 6 — — 1 — 7 990.6 186.7 — 189.0 114.0 1,480.3 124.8 — — 38.7 — 163.5 — 4 — — — 4 — 1 — — — 1 — 848.4 — — — 848.4 — 38.5 — — — 38.5 1 1 — — 1 3 — — — 1 — 1 364.1 231.3 — — 358.1 953.5 — — — 13.4 — 13.4 3 — — — — 3 2 — — — — 2 181.6 — — — — 181.6 84.7 — — — — 84.7 — — — — — — 3 — — — — 3 — — — — — — 59.8 — — — — 59.8 7 7 — 1 3 18 11 1 — 2 — 14 1,536.3 1,266.4 — 189.0 472.1 3,463.8 269.3 38.5 — 52.1 — 359.9 Number of Facilities - Leased Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Other Total # Area # Area # Area # Area # Area # Area 3 2 — 11 2 18 26 14 4 20 13 77 190.8 27.3 — 608.1 565.8 1,392.0 507.6 67.4 30.3 80.4 62.2 747.9 — 1 — 3 — 4 2 2 — 4 — 8 — 261.4 — 302.6 — 564.0 58.0 31.7 — 4.4 — 94.1 2 1 — 1 — 4 5 3 2 5 — 15 42.2 52.2 — 294.4 — 388.8 12.8 190.4 1.0 8.2 — 212.4 1 — — 1 — 2 — 2 1 1 — 4 200.0 — — 39.1 — 239.1 — 7.6 0.3 0.5 — 8.4 — — — — — — 8 4 2 3 1 18 — — — — — — 6 4 — 16 2 28 433.0 340.9 — 1,244.2 565.8 2,583.9 181.5 33.7 6.2 22.2 33.6 277.2 41 25 9 33 14 122 759.9 330.8 37.8 115.7 95.8 1,340.0 22 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these proceedings allege damages relating to personal injury claims, environmental exposures, intellectual property matters, commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to acquisitions or divestitures, and employment and employee benefit matters. We will continue to defend vigorously against all claims. Asbestos Proceedings ITT, including its subsidiary Goulds Pumps, Inc., has been sued, along with many other companies in product liability lawsuits alleging personal injury due to asbestos exposure. These claims allege that certain of our products sold prior to 1985 contained a part manufactured by a third party (e.g., a gasket) that contained asbestos. To the extent these third-party parts may have contained asbestos, it was encapsulated in the gasket (or other) material and was non-friable. Frequently, the plaintiffs are unable to identify any ITT or Goulds Pumps, Inc. product as a source of asbestos exposure. In addition, a large percentage of claims pending against the Company have been placed on inactive dockets because the plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a significant compensable loss. Our experience to date is that a majority of resolved claims are dismissed without payment by the Company. We record a liability for pending asbestos claims and asbestos claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. While it is probable that we will incur additional costs for future claims to be filed against the Company, the amount of liability for potential future claims beyond the next 10 years is not reasonably estimable due to a number of factors. As of December 31, 2014, we have recorded an undiscounted asbestos-related liability for pending claims and unasserted claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years of $1,223.2, including expected legal fees, and an associated asset of $476.4 which represents estimated recoveries from insurers, resulting in a net exposure of $746.8. See information provided below and in Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT The current executive officers of the Company, as of February 2, 2015, are listed below. Name Denise L. Ramos Aris C. Chicles Victoria L. Creamer Mary Beth Gustafsson Munish Nanda Luca Savi Thomas M. Scalera Neil W. Yeargin Steven C. Giuliano Age 58 53 45 55 50 49 43 49 45 Chief Executive Officer and President Current Title Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process Senior Vice President Human Resources Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer Senior Vice President and President, Control Technologies Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Senior Vice President and President, Interconnect Solutions Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer Denise L. Ramos was appointed Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of the Company in October 2011. She previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Ramos served as Chief Financial Officer for Furniture Brands International from 2005 to 2007. From 2000 to 2005, Ms. Ramos served as Senior Vice President and Corporate Treasurer at Yum! Brands, Inc. and Chief Financial Officer for the U.S. division of KFC Corporation. Ms. Ramos began her career in 1979 at Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO), where she had more than 20 years of business and financial experience serving in a number of increasingly responsible finance positions, including Corporate General Auditor and Assistant Treasurer. Ms. Ramos is currently a director of Praxair, Inc., since April 2014, where she serves on the Audit Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee. She serves on the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees for the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation and is also a member of the Business 23 Roundtable and the Business Council. Ms. Ramos was included in the Top 100 CEO Leaders in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math publication by STEMconnector, she recently received a Distinguished Leadership Award from the New York Hall of Science and she was named to Fortune magazine’s 2014 Top People in Business. Aris C. Chicles has served as our Executive Vice President and President, Industrial Process since May 2014 and previously as Executive Vice President since October 2011. Prior to that he served as our Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development from August 2007 to October 2011 and the Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development from June 2006 to July 2007. Before joining us, Mr. Chicles served as Vice President, Corporate Business Development at American Standard Companies, Inc., a global manufacturer of products and systems in diversified industries including heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, bath and kitchen fixtures and faucets, and automotive safety systems, from 2000 to 2006 and he had a 17-year career from 1983 to 2000 with Owens Corning Inc., a leading provider of building materials systems and composite solutions, in a series of progressively responsible operational positions. Victoria L. Creamer has served as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources since February 2015. Prior to joining ITT, Ms. Creamer served as Vice President, Global Compensation and Recognition of International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), a global technology and consulting company, from April 2013 to January 2015. Ms. Creamer held various other positions of increasing levels of responsibility at IBM since 1991. Mary Beth Gustafsson has served as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since February 2014 and as our Chief Compliance Officer since August 2014. Prior to joining us, Ms. Gustafsson served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of First Solar Inc., a global provider of comprehensive photovoltaic solar systems, from 2009 to 2013 and from 2008 to 2009 as Vice President, General Counsel. Ms. Gustafsson was previously Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of American Standard Companies, Inc., a global manufacturer of products and systems in diversified industries including heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment, bath and kitchen fixtures and faucets, and automotive safety systems, from 2005 to 2008. Munish Nanda has served as our Senior Vice President and President, Control Technologies since April 2011 and as our Vice President and Director, Integrated Supply Chain for ITT’s Fluid and Motion Control Group from April 2008 to April 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Nanda served in various operating leadership and general management positions with Thermo Fisher Scientific Corp. from July 2001 to April 2008, a provider of laboratory operations management solutions and technologies, and Honeywell Inc. from August 2000 to July 2001, a diversified technology and manufacturing company. Luca Savi has served as our Senior Vice President and President, Motion Technologies since November 2011. Prior to joining us, Mr. Savi served as Chief Operating Officer, Comau Body Welding at Comau, a subsidiary of the Fiat Group responsible for producing and serving advanced manufacturing systems, from 2009 to 2011 and prior to that as Chief Executive Officer, Comau North America from 2007 to 2009 and Chief Executive Officer, Comau China from 2004 to 2007. Mr. Savi previously held senior leadership roles at Honeywell International, Royal Dutch Shell and Ferruzzi-Montedison Group. Thomas M. Scalera has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Strategy and IT Leader since August 2014 and prior to that as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October 2011. He previously served as Vice President, Corporate Finance from 2010 to 2011 and Director, Investor Relations from 2008 to 2010. Prior to joining ITT in 2006, Mr. Scalera held senior financial roles with R.R. Donnelley, Dover Corp., and PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. Neil W. Yeargin has served as our Senior Vice President and President, Interconnect Solutions since February 2013. Prior to joining us, Mr. Yeargin held several leadership roles at Invensys plc, a global maker of software, systems and controls, most recently serving as Senior Vice President, Global Commercial Business from 2011 to 2013 and prior to that as Vice President and General Manager, Americas/APAC from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Yeargin previously held leadership roles in operations, supply chain and process improvement with Cooper Industries and Honeywell Inc. (formerly Allied Signal). Steven C. Giuliano has served as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since January 2014. Prior to joining us, Mr. Giuliano served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2011 and was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2007 to 2009 of Arch Chemicals, Inc. Mr. Giuliano was Controller of Arch Chemicals from 1999 through 2007, while assuming increasing levels of responsibility. 24 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES COMMON STOCK – MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS The table below reflects the range of market prices of our common stock as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the principal market in which this security is traded (under the trading symbol “ITT”). Three Months Ended: March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 2014 2013 High Low High Low $ 44.87 48.24 49.42 45.34 $ 37.87 41.48 44.93 36.74 $ 29.38 30.93 36.51 43.66 $ 23.83 25.94 29.11 35.06 We declared dividends of $0.11 and $0.10 per share of common stock in each of the four quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. In the first quarter of 2015, we declared a dividend of $0.1183 per share for shareholders of record on March 13, 2015. The amount and timing of dividends payable on our common stock are within the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based on, and affected by, a number of factors, including our financial position and results of operations, available cash, expected capital spending plans, prevailing business conditions, and other factors the Board deems relevant. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to what level of dividends, if any, will be paid in the future. There were approximately 10,950 holders of record of our common stock on February 16, 2015. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION The equity compensation plan information called for by Item 5(a) is set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, no equity securities of the Company were sold by the Company that were not registered under the Securities. ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES The following table summarizes our purchases of our common stock for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) PERIOD 10/1/2014 - 10/31/2014 11/1/2014 - 11/30/2014 12/1/2014 - 12/31/2014 TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED — 0.3 0.6 AVERAGE PRICE PAID PER SHARE(1) TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED AS PART OF PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED PLANS OR PROGRAMS(2) — $ 43.49 $ 41.87 — 0.2 0.6 MAXIMUM DOLLAR VALUE OF SHARES THAT MAY YET BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PLANS OR PROGRAMS(2) $ 350.7 $ 344.1 $ 320.7 (1) Average price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis and includes commissions. (2) On October 27, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a three-year $1 billion share repurchase program (2006 Share Repurchase Program). On December 16, 2008, our Board of Directors modified the provisions of the 2006 Share Repurchase Program to replace the original three-year term with an indefinite term. As of December 31, 2014, we had repurchased 16.4 shares for $679.3, including commissions, under the 2006 Share Repurchase Program. The program is consistent with our capital allocation process, which has centered on those investments necessary to grow our businesses organically and through acquisitions, while also providing cash returns to shareholders. Our strategy for cash flow utilization is to invest in our business, execute strategic acquisitions, pay dividends and repurchase common stock. 25 PERFORMANCE GRAPH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN Based upon an initial investment on December 31, 2009 of $100 with dividends reinvested ITT Corporation S&P 400 Mid-Cap S&P 400 Capital Goods 12/31/2009 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 12/31/2010 $ 106.97 $ 126.63 $ 135.56 12/31/2011 $ 121.96 $ 124.44 $ 129.39 12/31/2012 $ 150.57 $ 146.59 $ 162.41 12/31/2013 $ 282.13 $ 195.64 $ 229.59 12/31/2014 $ 265.56 $ 214.69 $ 230.16 This graph is not, and is not intended to be, indicative of future performance of our common stock. This graph shall not be deemed “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and should not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our prior or subsequent filings under the Securities Act. 26 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table presents selected historical financial data derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements for each of the five years presented. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto. (In Millions, except per share amounts) Results of Operations Revenue Gross profit Gross margin Asbestos-related costs, net(a) Other operating costs(b) Operating income (loss) Operating margin Income tax expense (benefit)(c) Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation (Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax(d) Net income (loss) attributable to ITT Corporation Income (loss) from continuing operations per basic share (Loss) income from discontinued operations per basic share Net income (loss) per basic share Income (loss) from continuing operations per diluted share (Loss) income from discontinued operations per diluted share Net income (loss) per diluted share Dividends declared Financial Position Cash and cash equivalents(e) Total assets(f) Total debt and capital leases(g) 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 $ 2,654.6 866.4 $ 2,496.9 799.8 $ 2,227.8 680.2 $ 2,085.6 645.0 $ 1,890.7 603.9 32.6% 3.9 596.1 266.4 10.0% 71.3 32.0% 32.8 583.4 183.6 7.4% (309.6) 30.5% 50.9 477.8 151.5 6.8% 39.6 30.9 % 31.9 % 100.4 789.5 (244.9) (11.7)% 260.6 384.8 399.7 (180.6) (9.6)% (142.2) 188.4 487.7 109.5 (576.5) (130.4) (3.9) 0.8 15.9 447.0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 184.5 2.06 (0.04) 2.02 2.03 (0.04) 1.99 0.44 584.0 3,631.5 8.5 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 488.5 5.36 0.01 5.37 5.28 0.01 5.29 0.40 507.3 3,740.2 48.9 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 125.4 $ (129.5) 1.18 0.17 1.35 1.16 0.17 1.33 0.364 544.5 3,386.1 26.9 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (6.22) 4.82 (1.40) (6.22) 4.82 (1.40) 1.591 689.8 3,671.5 6.5 934.7 804.3 (1.42) 10.17 8.75 (1.42) 10.17 8.75 2.00 206.0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 12,616.4 1,359.6 (a) In 2010, we recognized net asbestos-related costs of $384.8 reflecting several developments, including higher settlement costs and significantly increased activity in several higher-cost jurisdictions, increasing number of cases to be adjudicated and the expected legal costs. See Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (b) The increase in other operating costs from 2011 to 2012 was primarily due to the 2011 Distribution of Exelis and Xylem. In connection with activities taken to create the revised organizational structure and to complete the Distribution (referred to herein as transformation costs) we recognized total transformation costs of $636.2 during 2011, of which $396.1 are presented within income from continuing operations. Transformation costs incurred during 2011 primarily relate to losses on the extinguishment of debt, asset impairments, and employee retention and severance. The increase in other operating costs from 2012 to 2013 primarily relates to an additional eleven months of Bornemann operations during 2013. 27 (c) The 2011 tax expense of $260.6 includes a $340.7 valuation allowance for U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets as it became more likely than not that these deferred tax assets would not be realized, a $69.3 tax expense for undistributed foreign earnings that were no longer considered indefinitely reinvested, and a $30.9 tax benefit from an increase in state deferred tax assets which were re-measured based on enacted tax rates using different state apportionment factors as a result of the Distribution. The 2013 tax benefit of $309.6 includes the release of a U.S. deferred tax valuation allowance of $374.6 that was initially established in 2011. See Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. (d) Discontinued operations include the results of the Shape Cutting Businesses (disposed of in 2012), Exelis (disposed of in 2011), Xylem (disposed of in 2011) and transformation costs of $240.1 recorded during 2011. Transformation costs presented within discontinued operations are costs directly related to the Distribution, primarily advisory fees and information technology costs, which provide no future benefit to the Company. (e) The decline in cash and cash equivalents from 2011 to 2012 was primarily due to the acquisition of Bornemann for $193.2 net of cash acquired. The increase in cash and cash equivalents from 2010 to 2011 was primarily due to receipt of a net cash transfer (the Contribution) of $683.0 and $988.0 from Exelis and Xylem, respectively, in connection with the Distribution, offset in part by the extinguishment of $1,251.0 of long-term debt in October 2011. For all periods, cash and cash equivalents excludes cash and cash equivalents held by discontinued operations at the balance sheet date. See Management’s Discussion & Analysis, Liquidity section for further information. (f) The increase in total assets from 2012 to 2013 is primarily due to the release of a U.S. deferred tax valuation allowance of $374.6. The decline in total assets from 2011 to 2012 is primarily due to a reduction in asbestos- related assets and liabilities resulting from a Settlement Agreement executed during the third quarter of 2012. See Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. The decline in total assets from 2010 to 2011 is primarily attributable to the Distribution of Exelis and Xylem on October 31, 2011, which had total combined assets of $9,322.6 as of December 31, 2010. The assets of Exelis and Xylem, although presented as discontinued operations, are included in total assets for 2009 and 2010. (g) Total debt as of December 31, 2011 reflects the extinguishment of $1,251.0 of long-term debt in October 2011. 28 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto. As we noted earlier in the Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, this Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” (along with other sections of this Annual Report), may contain forward-looking statements. The risks discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and other risks identified in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could cause our actual results may differ materially from those expressed by such forward-looking statements. OVERVIEW ITT Corporation is a diversified manufacturer of highly engineered critical components and customized technology solutions for the energy, transportation and industrial markets. Building on its heritage of engineering, ITT partners with its customers to deliver enduring solutions to the key industries that underpin our modern way of life. We manufacture components that are integral to the operation of systems and manufacturing processes in our key markets. Our products provide enabling functionality for applications where reliability and performance are critically important to our customers and the users of their products. Our businesses share a common, repeatable operating model. Each business applies technology and engineering expertise to solve our customer’s most pressing challenges. Our applied engineering aptitude provides a superior business fit with our customers given the critical nature of their applications. This in turn provides us with a unique insight to our customer’s requirements and enables us to develop solutions to assist our customers achieve their business goals. Our technology and customer intimacy in tandem produce opportunities to capture recurring revenue streams, aftermarket opportunities, and long lived original equipment manufacturer (OEM) platforms. Our product and service offerings are organized into four segments: Industrial Process, Motion Technologies, Interconnect Solutions, and Control Technologies, each of which is discussed above in Part I, Item 1, “Company Overview - Segment Information.” EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2014, we continued to build on our multi-year strategy of creating profitable growth through our focus on four key strategic areas: Market Expansion, Differentiated Customer Experience, Operational Excellence, and Effective Capital Deployment. To promote these strategies, we invested in capabilities, capacity, technology, and R&D projects to drive growth and value creation. The benefits of these activities and our diversified portfolio are reflected in our 2014 financial results that included revenue growth of 6%, operating income growth of 45%, and operating margin expansion of 260 basis points. Our focus on Market Expansion contributed to revenue growth in emerging markets of 11% during 2014, and is exemplified by the profitable and sustainable brake pad market share growth in China that has led us to further our capacity investments in the region. We have also seen market expansion in developed geographic markets reflecting focused growth in energy and transportation. In addition, new product developments have allowed us to expand our aerospace solutions into the rotorcraft market. And direct-to-market strategies across our businesses are garnering new customer relationships and strengthening existing ones. We advanced our Differentiated Customer Experience through investments in our Lean transformation that have led to improvements in many of our key customer metrics. In addition, restructuring initiatives focused on accelerating the turnaround in our connectors and shock absorbers businesses have improved our levels of customer responsiveness. And, we have invested in building capabilities in human resources, information technology, culture and lean that will drive an improved experience for our customers. A key component of our Operational Excellence strategy is the successful execution of our Lean transformation. Our five-year journey to transform each of our significant revenue producing facilities began in 2012, and is currently on track. The physical transformation of our operations is evident in the meaningful change in factory flow, pull and visual management supported by cultural transformation with high employee engagement, standard work and self- managed teams. Many of our core metrics around safety, quality, delivery, inventory and productivity are improving and we are seeing the positive effects on inventory management and structurally lower breakeven points. We are also moving beyond the factory floor to lean out other critical processes of the value chain to become a truly Lean enterprise. 29 During 2014, we continued our organic investments in our business with significant capital spending geared towards expanding our brake pad and pump production capacity. We also returned approximately $100 to shareholders in 2014 through a combination of share repurchases and dividends and invested $28 in restructuring initiatives. From a results standpoint, 2014 was a strong year as we delivered consolidated revenue growth of 6% and organic revenue growth of 7%. The organic revenue growth was most significantly driven by share gains in the global automotive and rail markets and by global sales of project pumps and connectors to the oil and gas market. In addition, we drove a 5% increase in organic orders. Consolidated operating income was $266 for the year, representing an $83 or 45% increase from the prior year, due to improved segment operating performance reflecting higher sales volume and net savings of approximately $60 from productivity, sourcing, and restructuring initiatives and a year-over-year reduction in asbestos-related costs of $29 primarily due to favorable movements in certain key assumptions. Net income from continuing operations was $188 during 2014, resulting in earnings of $2.03 per diluted share. Adjusted income from continuing operations was $229 for 2014, reflecting an increase of $43, or 23%, over the prior year. Our adjusted income from continuing operations translated into $2.47 per diluted share, a $0.45 per share, or 22%, increase over the prior year. See the “Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Measures,” for reconciliation of non-GAAP measures. Trends and Uncertainties Our success in 2015 will rely heavily on the effective execution of our strategic plan, however there are certain macro-trends that are out of our control and create uncertainty with regard to our overall business and financial performance. These trends include, but are not limited to, the recent decline in oil prices, instability in regions such as Venezuela and Russia, foreign currency fluctuations, emerging market deceleration, and modest global GDP growth. A portion of our business provides products, such as pumps and connectors, to the oil and gas market. In connection with the recent declines in the price of oil, we expect to see some level of customer project delays and/or order cancellations during 2015 and possibly after. Depending on the extent to which oil prices continue to decline or stay depressed, this trend could create an unfavorable material effect on the results of our businesses. Revenue stemming from the oil and gas market was approximately 20% of our total revenue during 2014. Growth in emerging markets is an important component of the growth strategy for Industrial Process and ITT. To date, we have not experienced any material disruptions in our operations, however, during the fourth quarter of 2014, we recognized a charge associated with our Venezuelan subsidiary due to the write-down of certain assets and the remeasurement of the subsidiary's financial statements and contract obligations at a lower foreign currency exchange rate. We will continue to closely monitor developments given the instability in the current political environments. The continuation or escalation of the current geopolitical instability in these regions could negatively impact our results and future growth prospects. 30 DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS 2014 VERSUS 2013 Revenue Gross profit Gross margin Operating expenses Operating expense to revenue ratio Operating income Operating margin Interest and non-operating expenses, net Income tax expense (benefit) Effective tax rate 2014 2013 $ 2,654.6 866.4 $2,496.9 799.8 32.6% 600.0 22.6% 266.4 10.0% 4.4 71.3 27.2% 188.4 (3.9) 184.5 32.0 % 616.2 24.7 % 183.6 7.4 % 3.1 (309.6) (171.5)% 487.7 0.8 $ 488.5 Change 6.3 % 8.3 % 60bp (2.6 )% (210)bp 45.1 % 260bp 41.9 % (123.0 )% 19,870bp (61.4 )% (587.5 )% (62.2 )% Income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation (Loss) earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income attributable to ITT Corporation $ REVENUE Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2,654.6, reflecting an increase of $157.7, or 6.3%, over the prior year. The Industrial Process segment generated revenue growth of $100.9, or 9.1%, primarily from long-term industrial pump projects serving the oil and gas, mining, and chemical markets in North America and Latin America. The Motion Technologies segment experienced revenue growth of $47.6, or 6.6%, driven by strength in both automotive OE and aftermarket, as well as in the global rail markets. The Interconnect Solutions segment revenue declined $2.7, or 0.7%, primarily due to weakness in the defense and communication market connectors, as well as from the expected decline in our non-strategic connector product lines, offset by growth from oil and gas in the North American market. The Control Technologies segment revenue grew $12.3, or 4.4%, reflecting strength in both our industrial and commercial aerospace markets. As mentioned previously, in the Executive Summary section of Management's Discussion and Analysis, our future revenue results may be negatively impacted by the current economic and political instability in Russia and Venezuela, foreign currency fluctuations, and the recent decline in the price of oil. The following table illustrates revenue generated within a specific country or region for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the corresponding percentage change, and the organic growth, a non-GAAP measure. See below for further discussion of year-over-year revenue activity at the segment level. See the section titled "Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Measures" for a definition and reconciliation of organic revenue growth. United States Germany Canada France Other developed markets Total developed markets South and Central America(a) Eastern Europe and Russia Middle East and Africa China and Hong Kong Other emerging growth markets Total emerging growth markets Total Revenue (a) Includes Mexico 31 $ 2014 927.0 303.3 139.0 129.4 319.9 1,818.6 239.4 125.9 162.7 184.7 123.3 836.0 $ 2,654.6 $ 2013 896.2 266.7 106.8 144.7 331.9 1,746.3 200.2 124.3 144.1 140.5 141.5 750.6 $ 2,496.9 Change 3.4 % 13.7 % 30.1 % (10.6)% (3.6)% 4.1 % 19.6 % 1.3 % 12.9 % 31.5 % (12.9)% 11.4 % 6.3 % Organic Growth 3.5 % 13.0 % 30.7 % (11.0)% 5.1 % 4.1 % 27.7 % 2.5 % 11.9 % 32.0 % (13.2)% 13.5 % 6.9 % The following table illustrates the year-over-year revenue results from each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Total Revenue Industrial Process 2014 $ 1,208.3 769.4 392.8 290.5 (6.4) $ 2,654.6 2013 $ 1,107.4 721.8 395.5 278.2 (6.0) $ 2,496.9 Change 9.1 % 6.6 % (0.7)% 4.4 % 6.7 % 6.3 % Organic Growth 10.7 % 6.1 % (0.4)% 4.6 % — 6.9 % Industrial Process revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1,208.3, reflecting an increase of $100.9, or 9.1%, as compared to the prior year. Unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacted revenue growth by $20.6, or 1.9%. Organic revenue increased 10.7%, over the prior year, primarily reflecting market share gains in the large, highly engineered project pump business, driven by our growth in the oil and gas market of approximately 21%. The project pump business also contributed to revenue growth in the mining market of approximately 16% and in the chemical market of approximately 9%. The growth of our project pump business was partially offset by a decline in our Asia Pacific general chemical and mining markets. Orders for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $1,214.2, reflecting an increase of $52.2, or 4.5%, as compared to the prior year. Unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacted order growth by $20.7, or 1.8%. Organic orders increased 6.0%, over the prior year, primarily reflecting a strong fourth quarter of large engineered project business, mainly in the downstream oil and gas markets in Canada that led to full year-over-year growth of approximately $60 in the global oil and gas market. We also experienced strong fourth quarter 2014 orders of pumps and parts for the mining market, primarily to the Latin America region, which contributed to our full year 2014 order growth in the mining market of approximately $10. The level of order and shipment activity related to engineered pumps can vary from period to period, which may impact year-over-year comparisons. Backlog as of December 31, 2014 was $603.4, reflecting a decrease of $40.6, or 6.3%, from the prior year. The year-over-year decrease in backlog is principally due to unfavorable foreign currency translation. Motion Technologies Motion Technologies revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $769.4, reflecting an increase of $47.6, or 6.6%, compared to the prior year, due to approximately 5% growth in Friction Technologies and 19.0% growth in KONI. Growth in Friction Technologies came from both the aftermarket and OE channels. Aftermarket benefited from the addition of a new production line, as well as improved production press efficiency rates coming from specific Lean initiatives to meet increased demand. The year-over-year increase in OE was driven by growth in China which corresponds with our investments and strategic focus to gain market share in the Asia Pacific region. Higher year- over-year revenues in KONI related to growth in the global rail market as well as growth in the North American automotive market. Foreign currency translation favorably impacted revenue growth by $3.4, resulting in organic revenue growth of 6.1%, over the prior year. Orders for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $797.0, reflecting an increase of 7.1% over the prior year, driven by order growth at KONI of approximately 23% from continued strong order intake within the global rail market, along with strong North American aftermarket orders. Orders at our Friction Technologies business increased 4% during 2014, due to key automotive platform wins in Europe and China. Organic orders increased $49.8, or 6.7%, over the prior year. Interconnect Solutions Interconnect Solutions revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $392.8, reflecting a decrease of $2.7, or 0.7%, compared to the prior year. The decline in revenue was mainly due to the phase-out of certain non-strategic connector product lines in the communications market and weakness in defense market, which was partially offset by year-over-year growth in our other market areas. Revenue from the oil and gas market increased during 2014 by approximately $7, primarily within North America. Revenue from the transportation and industrial market increased by approximately $6, due primarily to growth in heavy equipment and electric vehicle connector products. Revenue from the commercial aircraft market increased approximately 11% over the prior year. Revenue from the medical technologies market was relatively consistent with the prior year. 32 Orders decreased during 2014 by 3.0%, to $388.4, primarily reflecting year-over-year declines from the U.S. defense market, and the Asia Pacific medical market. These declines were partially offset by an increase in North America oil and gas orders. Control Technologies Control Technologies revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $290.5, reflecting an increase of $12.3, or 4.4%, as compared to the prior year. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by growth of 6% in our CT Industrial division and 4% in the CT Aerospace division. The CT Industrial growth was due to gains in energy absorption products, which experienced growth across all major markets, and from higher sales of natural gas valves due to the continued conversion of commercial vehicles to a natural gas fuel source. The aerospace growth was due to both higher commercial OE sales of approximately 15%, stemming from increased aircraft production rates, as well as increased sales of aftermarket spares of 38%. Total aftermarket sales grew 2% over the prior year, as the growth in spares was offset by a decline in revenue from an aftermarket program that is ending. In addition, the overall CT aerospace revenue growth was reduced by lower year-over-year sales from our seat actuation product line and a 7% decline in sales to the defense market. Orders received during the year ended December 31, 2014 were $289.2, reflecting an increase of $13.2, or 4.8%, primarily driven by growth in commercial aerospace OEM components due to production rate increases and share gains, as well as order growth in the aerospace aftermarket spares business. GROSS PROFIT Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $866.4, an increase of $66.6, or 8.3%, as compared to the prior year. The table below provides gross profit and gross margin by segment for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Corporate and Other Total gross profit Gross margin: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Consolidated 2014 2013 $ 385.4 219.5 136.8 123.9 0.8 $ 866.4 $ 361.7 193.4 129.7 113.7 1.3 $ 799.8 31.9% 28.5% 34.8% 42.7% 32.6% 32.7% 26.8% 32.8% 40.9% 32.0% Change 6.6 % 13.5 % 5.5 % 9.0 % (38.5 )% 8.3 % (80)bp 170bp 200bp 180bp 60bp 33 OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased $16.2 compared to the prior year, primarily due to lower net asbestos-related costs as well as from additional cost savings generated by recent restructuring and Lean initiative actions, which were partially offset by higher R&D costs and strategic investment costs. The following table provides further information by expense type, as well as a breakdown of operating expense by segment. Sales and marketing expenses General and administrative expenses Research and development expenses Asbestos-related costs, net Total operating expenses By Segment: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Corporate & Other 2014 $ 219.4 300.1 76.6 3.9 $ 600.0 $ 261.5 88.6 114.6 60.4 74.9 2013 $ 216.2 299.9 67.3 32.8 $ 616.2 $ 249.7 93.1 115.5 58.4 99.5 Change 1.5 % 0.1 % 13.8 % (88.1)% (2.6)% 4.7 % (4.8)% (0.8)% 3.4 % (24.7)% Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $219.4, reflecting an increase of $3.2, or 1.5%, mainly due to increased selling costs associated with higher sales volume. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased 40 basis points to 8.3%, primarily due to a decline in marketing expenses of approximately 6% combined with the year-over-year revenue growth. G&A expenses were $300.1 for the year ended December 31, 2014, which were consistent with the prior year. During 2014 we incurred lower transformation and repositioning costs of $16.1 and received a favorable legal settlement; however these items were offset by an increase in strategic investment costs, charges related to our operations in Venezuela, as well as higher spending on various corporate initiatives, such as Human Resource (HR) capability improvements and our culture initiative. R&D expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $76.6, reflecting an increase of $9.3, or 13.8%. As a percentage of revenue, R&D expenses increased to 2.9% in 2014 from 2.7% in 2013, as we continued to invest in new product developments for use in new automotive platforms and expanding multiphase pump technology, as well as in various other targeted growth markets. We anticipate our investments in future R&D activities will moderately increase from current spending levels to ensure a continuing flow of innovative, high quality products and maintain our competitive position in the markets we serve. During 2014, we recognized net asbestos-related costs of $3.9, reflecting a decrease of $28.9 compared to the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to our 2014 asbestos remeasurement that resulted in a year-over-year benefit of $58.8, which was partially offset by a settlement agreement entered into in the prior year with an insurer that resulted in a $31.0 gain. Based on the results of our 2014 remeasurement, we decreased our estimated undiscounted asbestos liability, including legal fees, by $42.8, reflecting a decrease in costs the company estimates will be incurred to resolve all pending claims, as well as unasserted claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. The decrease in our estimated liability is a result of several developments, including an expectation of lower defense costs relative to indemnities paid over the projection period and favorable experience in the ratio of dismissed claims versus settled claims. These favorable factors were offset in part by an increasing number of cases expected to be adjudicated. Further, in 2014, the Company increased its estimated asbestos-related assets by $16.0, principally due to the estimated probable recoveries of certain liabilities resulting from the annual study. See Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our asbestos-related liabilities and assets. 34 OPERATING INCOME Operating income for 2014 was $266.4, reflecting an increase of $82.8, or 45.1%, over the prior year primarily due to segment operating income growth of $58.7 and lower asbestos-related of $28.9. The following table illustrates the 2014 and 2013 operating income and operating margin by segments and at the consolidated level. Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Segment operating income Asbestos-related costs, net Other corporate costs Total corporate and other costs Total operating income (loss) Operating margin: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Segment operating margin Consolidated operating margin 2014 2013 $ 123.9 130.9 22.2 63.5 340.5 (3.9) (70.2) (74.1) $ 266.4 10.3% 17.0% 5.7% 21.9% 12.8% 10.0% $ 112.0 100.3 14.2 55.3 281.8 (32.8) (65.4) (98.2) $ 183.6 10.1% 13.9% 3.6% 19.9% 11.3% 7.4% Change 10.6 % 30.5 % 56.3 % 14.8 % 20.8 % (88.1)% 7.3 % (24.5)% 45.1 % 20bp 310bp 210bp 200bp 150bp 260bp Industrial Process operating income for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $11.9, or 10.6%, to $123.9 and resulted in an operating margin of 10.3%, reflecting growth of 20 basis points over the prior year. The benefit from increased sales volume, particularly large engineered project pumps, of approximately $20, and a similar benefit from net savings from Lean productivity and global sourcing initiatives taken during 2014 were partially offset by an unfavorable shift of sales mix and continued project pricing pressures, resulting in an approximate 40 basis point increase to operating margin. Acquisition-related costs related to Bornemann, incurred during 2013, and a reduction in postretirement plan costs and repositioning-related expenses provided a year-over-year operating income benefit of $15.3, resulting in a 120 basis point improvement to operating margin, which were offset by higher strategic investment spending, charges of approximately $10 associated with our operations in Venezuela, corporate expense allocations, and operational impacts from certain complex engineering projects. Motion Technologies operating income for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $30.6, or 30.5%, to $130.9 and resulted in an operating margin of 17.0%, reflecting growth of 310 basis points over the prior year. The primary growth driver was higher sales volumes which provided approximately $24 of additional operating income and a 200 basis point operating margin improvement. Motion Technologies' results also reflect year-over-year operating income and margin growth from the KONI business which are due to strong sales volume growth, fixed cost reductions, and manufacturing improvements. In addition, net savings from Lean productivity and global sourcing initiatives and a favorable legal settlement during 2014, as well as lower year-over-year restructuring costs provided approximately $29 of additional operating income, and approximately 380 basis point increase to operating margin. The total year- over-year growth in operating income was partially offset by unfavorable OE pricing, as well as higher R&D and other costs related to capacity expansion and start-up costs. Interconnect Solutions operating income for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $8.0, or 56.3%, to $22.2 and resulted in an operating margin of 5.7%, reflecting growth of 210 basis points over the prior year. The increase in operating income and margin was primarily driven by the cost savings from our restructuring actions taken over the last 2 years, as well as from additional net savings from Lean and sourcing initiatives and lower year-over- year postretirement employee benefit costs, resulting from a plan modification to reduce future participant benefits, that improved operating income and margin by approximately $27 and 710 basis points, respectively. The favorability of these items was partially offset by costs incurred associated with an action to move certain production lines from one location to another existing lower cost manufacturing site, costs incurred related to the design of an enterprise resource planning system, higher restructuring costs, and a negative change in sales mix that reduced operating income and margin by approximately $20 and 500 basis points, respectively. 35 Control Technologies operating income for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $8.2, or 14.8%, to $63.5 and resulted in an operating margin of 21.9%, reflecting growth of 200 basis points over the prior year. The growth in operating income stemmed from net productivity savings generated by Lean and sourcing initiatives, increased sales volume and benefits from pricing initiatives, and lower pension, repositioning and restructuring costs which provided approximately $14 of additional operating income and 400 basis points to operating margin for 2014. However, the benefit provided by these items was partially offset by an unfavorable shift in sales mix related to the decline in sales to the defense market and from an aerospace aftermarket program that is nearing its end of life and higher year-over- year strategic investment-related costs and corporate expense allocations which reduced operating income and margin by approximately $6 and 200 basis points, respectively. Other corporate costs for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $4.8, or 7.3%, to $70.2. The increase was due to higher compensation and benefit-related costs, including severance, bonus and stock compensation expenses, combined with a favorable worker's disability insurance adjustment in 2013 that did not occur in 2014. Additionally, other corporate expenses for 2014 were impacted by higher investment spending on various corporate initiatives, such as Human Resource capabilities and our culture initiative. These costs were partially offset by a decline in transformation and repositioning costs of $10.3. As mentioned previously, in the Executive Summary section of Management's Discussion and Analysis, our future results may be negatively impacted by the current economic and political instability in Russia and Venezuela, foreign currency fluctuations, and the recent decline in the price of oil. INTEREST AND NON-OPERATING EXPENSES, NET Interest expense Interest income Miscellaneous expense (income), net Total interest and non-operating expenses, net 2014 4.0 2.5 2.9 4.4 $ $ 2013 6.3 5.0 1.8 3.1 $ $ Change (36.5)% (50.0)% 61.1 % 41.9 % Interest expense decreased by $2.3 during 2014, due to a favorable movement in accrued interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits and lower average outstanding debt and commercial paper during 2014. Interest income decreased by $2.5 during 2014, primarily due to interest received during 2013 in connection with a settlement of legacy receivables and payables with a former ITT entity, partially offset by additional year-over-year interest earned on cash deposit balances. Miscellaneous expenses (income), net increased $1.1 during 2014, primarily due to income earned during 2013 in connection with transition services arrangements pertaining to the 2011 Distribution of Exelis and Xylem. INCOME TAX EXPENSE For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized an income tax expense of $71.3 representing an effective tax rate of 27.2%, compared to an income tax benefit of $309.6, and an effective tax rate of (171.5)% for 2013. Excluding the impact of the release of the valuation allowance (described further in Note 5, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements) the effective tax rate was 36.0% in 2013. The 2014 effective tax rate includes tax benefits resulting from a tax basis step-up election in Italy and additional income that is eligible for a tax holiday in Korea. These were partially offset by changes in the New York State income tax law during the year which resulted in an increase in tax expense of $3.2. After considering all available evidence, including a cumulative loss and the absence of any significant positive evidence, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against certain foreign net deferred tax assets in Germany and Venezuela. In addition, a portion of the deferred tax assets in Italy are no longer realizable. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses and tax credits and certain foreign net deferred tax assets primarily in Luxembourg, Germany, India and China which are not expected to be realized. Overall, the increase in the valuation allowance of $11.8 is primarily attributable to foreign net operating loss carryforwards in Luxembourg. The Company operates in various tax jurisdictions and is subject to examination by tax authorities in these jurisdictions. The Company is currently under examination in several jurisdictions including Germany, Italy, Korea, the United Kingdom, the U.S. and Venezuela. The U.S. federal income tax audit for the years 2009 through 2011 has received Joint Committee on Taxation review. We anticipate that we will receive the final audit report within the next 12 months. The calculation of our tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits includes dealing with uncertainties in the 36 application of complex tax laws and regulations in various tax jurisdictions. Due to the complexity of some uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the unrecognized tax benefit. The settlement of an examination could result in changes in amounts attributable to us through the Tax Matters Agreement entered into with Exelis and Xylem. Over the next 12 months, the net amount of the tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits in foreign and domestic jurisdictions could change by approximately $86.5 due to changes in audit status, expiration of statutes of limitations and other events. (LOSS) EARNINGS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX During 2014, the Company incurred a loss from discontinued operations of $3.9, net of tax, primarily related to a settlement payment to a former ITT entity. During 2013, ITT had income from discontinued operations primarily related to a reversal of warranty reserves and legal-related contingencies associated with previously disposed businesses that were partially offset by a net after-tax loss of $1.3 related to a settlement of legacy receivables and payables with a former ITT entity. DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS 2013 VERSUS 2012 Revenue Gross profit Gross margin Operating expenses Operating expense to revenue ratio Operating income Operating margin Interest and non-operating expenses, net Income tax (benefit) expense Effective tax rate Income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income attributable to ITT Corporation REVENUE 2013 2012 $ 2,496.9 799.8 $ 2,227.8 680.2 32.0 % 616.2 24.7 % 183.6 7.4 % 3.1 (309.6) (171.5)% 487.7 0.8 $ 488.5 30.5% 528.7 23.7% 151.5 6.8% 2.4 39.6 26.6% 109.5 15.9 125.4 $ Change 12.1 % 17.6 % 150bp 16.6 % 100bp 21.2 % 60bp 29.2 % (881.8 )% (19,810)bp 345.4 % (95.0 )% 289.6 % Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $269.1, or 12.1%%, over the prior year, primarily driven by our fourth quarter 2012 acquisition of Bornemann, which represented $136.0 of the increase. The Industrial Process segment saw organic revenue gains during the year from global expansion in the oil and gas market. In addition, we experienced growth of $95.6, or 15.3%, from our Motion Technologies segment primarily due to year-over-year OEM volume growth from expanded global brake pad market share gains and increased aftermarket demand. Our Interconnect Solutions segment also generated sales growth of $19.8, or 5.3%, with increased sales in all core market categories. The following table illustrates the year-over-year revenue results from each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. 2013 $ 1,107.4 721.8 395.5 278.2 (6.0) $ 2,496.9 $ 2012 955.8 626.2 375.7 277.1 (7.0) $ 2,227.8 Change 15.9 % 15.3 % 5.3 % 0.4 % (14.3)% 12.1 % Organic Growth 3.7% 12.7% 5.9% 0.7% — 6.3% Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Total Revenue 37 The following table illustrates revenue generated within a specific country or region for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the corresponding percentage change, and the organic growth. See below for further discussion of year-over-year revenue activity at the segment level. See the section titled "Key Performance Indicators and Non-GAAP Measures" for a definition and reconciliation of organic revenue growth. United States Germany Canada France Other developed markets Total developed markets South and Central America(a) Eastern Europe and Russia Middle East and Africa China and Hong Kong Other emerging growth markets Total emerging growth markets Total Revenue (a) Includes Mexico Industrial Process $ 2013 896.2 266.7 106.8 144.7 331.9 1,746.3 200.2 124.3 144.1 140.5 141.5 750.6 $ 2,496.9 $ 2012 869.3 200.5 81.2 118.2 319.9 1,589.1 198.3 103.1 114.3 113.6 109.4 638.7 $ 2,227.8 Change 3.1% 33.0% 31.5% 22.4% 3.8% 9.9% 1.0% 20.6% 26.1% 23.7% 29.3% 17.5% 12.1% Organic Growth 0.9 % 19.7 % 16.0 % 17.2 % 1.7 % 4.7 % (8.5)% 11.2 % 19.8 % 17.8 % 24.8 % 10.2 % 6.3 % Industrial Process revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $151.6, or 15.9%, year-over-year, primarily related to our fourth quarter 2012 acquisition of Bornemann. This acquisition provided $136.0 of incremental year-over-year revenue during 2013. Organic revenue increased 3.7% primarily due to gains in the global oil and gas market of approximately 21%, as well as increased shipments of project pumps in the North American chemical market. In addition, organic revenue growth reflected strength in aftermarket sales of approximately 15% as compared to the prior year. The growth in these areas during 2013 was partially offset by year-over-year weakness for North American baseline pumps and valves, delays in large global project shipments, as well as lower activity in the global mining and general industrial markets. Orders for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $207.1, or 21.7%, as compared to the prior year, primarily reflecting Bornemann orders of $170.6. Organic orders increased $39.6, or 4.1%, due to an increase in parts orders and increased project business globally, partially offset by lower baseline business and valves orders in North America. The level of order and shipment activity related to engineered pumps can vary from period to period, which may impact year-over-year comparisons. Motion Technologies Motion Technologies revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $95.6, or 15.3%, compared to the prior year, reflecting significant gains in both OEM and aftermarket within the Friction Technologies business. Foreign currency translation favorably impacted revenue growth by $16.1, resulting in organic revenue growth of 12.7%, over the prior year. Our aftermarket revenues, which are predominately generated within Europe and include OES and independent aftermarket channels, grew by approximately 15% during 2013 reflecting the benefits from a number of new business awards and campaigns from automakers. Additionally, during 2013, we began to generate OES volumes from OE platforms in China. The strong growth in OEM automotive brake pad volume was driven by Europe and China. The growth in Europe resulted from our increasing number of automotive platforms and share gains, despite continued economic challenges. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), car sales in Europe were 11.9 units in 2013, a year-over-year decrease of 1.7%. The Chinese automotive market saw a significant increase in car sales during 2013, approximately 14% according to China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). Our investments and strategic focus to gain market share in the region led to growth of approximately 54% in China. 38 Motion Technologies 2013 revenue growth was partially offset by a decline in revenue from the KONI business primarily related to the delay of various rail infrastructure projects in China and lower orders of military-related shock absorbers in the U.S. Orders increased during 2013 by 18.8% year-over-year to $743.9, including a favorable impact from foreign currency of $16.1, reflecting significant fourth quarter order growth from Friction Technologies and KONI. Interconnect Solutions Interconnect Solutions revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $19.8, or 5.3%, compared to the prior year, due to growth in each of our served core markets, attributable to improving macro-economic conditions affecting the connector industry and by increased operational execution. Our growth in the aerospace and defense market of 11.9% was driven by benefits from funded U.S. programs unaffected by the U.S. sequestration and by strong demand from commercial airline manufacturers. Growth in the communications market of 6.0% was driven by a recent position win with a major Smartphone manufacturer and a corresponding production ramp-up during 2013. Growth in the industrial and transportation market of 3.0% reflected increases in North America and Europe as well as growth from sales of medical-related connector equipment. Growth in the oil and gas market of 7.0% primarily reflects increased distribution activity in North and South America. Orders increased during 2013 by 4.3%, to $400.3, primarily reflecting year-over-year gains from the aerospace and defense and industrial markets. Control Technologies Control Technologies revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $1.1, or 0.4%, as compared to the prior year, reflecting growth in our aerospace commercial OEM products of approximately 20%, offset by a decline in revenue from our defense and industrial market product applications and an aerospace aftermarket program that is nearing its end of life. Our defense products applications revenue was down approximately 12% for the year, mainly due to programs impacted by the U.S. government sequestration. Revenue from industrial product applications declined approximately 5%, primarily driven by a decline in energy absorption equipment sales due to the completion of two large infrastructure projects during the prior year and lower sales of precision motion control products. Orders decreased during 2013 by 2.7%, to $276.0, primarily due to large orders received during the fourth quarter of 2012 related to our seat actuation systems. Orders received during 2013 were also impacted by lower defense- related orders and the aerospace aftermarket program that is nearing its end of life. These declines were partially offset by order growth of approximately 30% from commercial OEM product applications driven by improved content levels and higher aircraft production rates. GROSS PROFIT Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $799.8, an increase of 17.6%, primarily from net savings related to global sourcing and VBLSS initiatives combined with contributions from our Bornemann acquisition. In addition, increased sales volumes were partially offset by an unfavorable change in price and sales mix across segments. The table below provides gross profit and gross margin by segment for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Corporate and Other Total gross profit Gross margin: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Consolidated 39 2013 2012 $ 361.7 193.4 129.7 113.7 1.3 $ 799.8 $ 294.8 160.4 111.8 111.8 1.4 $ 680.2 32.7% 26.8% 32.8% 40.9% 32.0% 30.8% 25.6% 29.8% 40.3% 30.5% Change 22.7 % 20.6 % 16.0 % 1.7 % (7.1)% 17.6 % 190bp 120bp 300bp 60bp 150bp OPERATING EXPENSES Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $87.5 compared to the prior year, primarily driven by increased costs from the Bornemann business and costs to restructure and reposition the Company following the 2011 spin-offs, partially offset by lower asbestos-related costs. The following table provides further information by expense type, as well as a breakdown of operating expense by segment. Sales and marketing expenses General and administrative expenses Research and development expenses Asbestos-related costs, net Total operating expenses By Segment: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Corporate & Other 2013 $ 216.2 299.9 67.3 32.8 $ 616.2 $ 249.7 93.1 115.5 58.4 99.5 2012 $ 180.4 234.7 62.7 50.9 $ 528.7 $ 195.5 77.3 104.9 53.5 97.5 Change 19.8 % 27.8 % 7.3 % (35.6)% 16.6 % 27.7 % 20.4 % 10.1 % 9.2 % 2.1 % Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $35.8 primarily due to costs from the Bornemann business. G&A expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $65.2, including incremental year-over-year 2013 expenses of $18.6 associated with the Bornemann business. In addition, during 2013 we recorded restructuring charges of $28.8, an increase of $14.8, primarily related to the Interconnect Solutions turnaround strategy. Additionally, during 2013 we incurred costs to reposition the organization (repositioning costs) of $23.0 following the 2011 spin-offs of Exelis and Xylem. Repositioning costs primarily consisted of costs to exit transition services agreements, IT infrastructure modifications, and other various actions and resulted in an increase to G&A expenses of $14.3. In addition, 2013 was unfavorably impacted by higher corporate G&A expenses following the 2012 recognition of an insurance-related asset on environmental exposures and higher prior year environmental insurance recoveries. Also included in G&A expenses are transformation costs of $2.2 and $13.0, including $1.3 and $4.3 that was reflected in results of our business segments, during 2013 and 2012, respectively. Transformation costs reflect expenses incurred in connection with activities taken to complete the separation following the Distribution. As of December 31, 2013, activities related to the Distribution are substantially complete. R&D costs increased $4.6 year-over-year, as we continued to invest in new product developments in targeted growth markets at each segment. As a percentage of revenue, R&D costs declined to 2.7% in 2013 from 2.8% in 2012, primarily as a function of our year-over-year revenue growth. During 2013, we recognized net asbestos-related costs of $32.8, reflecting a decrease of $18.1 compared to the prior year, primarily related to a $31.0 benefit recognized in connection with a settlement agreement with an insurer in 2013 compared to a $5.8 benefit due to a settlement in 2012. Additionally, a distribution received from an insolvent insurer resulted in a separate $5.8 benefit in 2012. We experienced $2.4 favorability compared to the prior year in connection with our annual remeasurement. Based on the results of our 2013 remeasurement, performed in the third quarter of each year, we decreased our estimated undiscounted asbestos liability, including legal fees, by $65.0, which is a result of several developments, including an expectation of lower defense costs relative to indemnities paid over the projection period and favorable experience in the ratio of cases dismissed versus settled. These favorable impacts were offset in part by an increase in expected average settlement values. Also in connection with the 2013 remeasurement the Company reduced its estimated asbestos-related assets by $65.5, which was primarily the result of the decrease in the estimated liability and changes in our recovery assumptions. In addition to the charges associated with our annual remeasurement, we record a net asbestos charge each quarter to maintain a rolling 10-year forecast period. See Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in our Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our asbestos-related liabilities and assets. 40 OPERATING INCOME Operating income for 2013 was $183.6, reflecting an increase of 21.2% over the prior year primarily due to segment operating income growth of $34.2 and lower asbestos-related costs of $18.1, partially offset by an increase in other corporate costs. The following table illustrates the 2013 and 2012 operating income and operating margin by segments and at the consolidated level. Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Segment operating income Asbestos-related costs, net Other corporate costs Total corporate and other costs Total operating income (loss) Operating margin: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Segment operating margin Consolidated operating margin 2013 2012 $ 112.0 100.3 14.2 55.3 281.8 (32.8) (65.4) (98.2) $ 183.6 10.1% 13.9% 3.6% 19.9% 11.3% 7.4% $ 99.3 83.1 6.9 58.3 247.6 (50.9) (45.2) (96.1) $ 151.5 10.4% 13.3% 1.8% 21.0% 11.1% 6.8% Change 12.8 % 20.7 % 105.8 % (5.1 )% 13.8 % (35.6 )% 44.7 % 2.2 % 21.2 % (30)bp 60bp 180bp (110)bp 20bp 60bp Industrial Process operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $12.7, or 12.8%, while operating margin declined 30 basis points to 10.1%, as favorability from increased sales volume and Lean and sourcing cost reduction initiatives were partially offset by an $8.1 increase in amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired during the Bornemann acquisition. In addition, operating income and margin were unfavorably impacted by an increase of approximately $7.0 in strategic investment costs primarily related to facility expansion expenses and an aftermarket expansion initiative and an increase in restructuring expenses of $4.2 primarily related to the closure of a non-core construction pump business. Motion Technologies operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased $17.2, resulting in a 60 basis point improvement in operating margin. The increase in operating income and margin was primarily due to higher sales volumes and net savings from sourcing, Lean, and restructuring initiatives. These benefits were partially offset by higher maintenance costs and unfavorable pricing impacts. In addition, our 2013 operating income was unfavorably impacted by an inventory valuation adjustment, increases in legal, warranty and restructuring costs, and higher bad debt expense. Interconnect Solutions operating income increased $7.3 for the year ended December 31, 2013, resulting in operating income of $14.2 and a 180 basis point increase in operating margin. Operating income was favorably impacted by net savings from restructuring, sourcing, and Lean initiatives as well as higher sales volume, but had an unfavorable sales mix impact. These benefits were also partially offset by an increase in restructuring costs of $10.0, as well as an unfavorable impact of $1.3 from foreign currency fluctuations. Control Technologies operating income for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased $3.0, reflecting a 110 basis point decline in operating margin. The year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by an unfavorable change in sales mix, an increase in strategic investment expenses, an unfavorable impact from foreign currency fluctuations, and a pension curtailment charge. These items were partially offset by net cost reductions from Lean, sourcing, and pricing initiatives of approximately $8.2. Other corporate costs increased $20.2, primarily due to higher repositioning costs related to system separation activities, as well as a prior year benefit recorded related to the recognition of an insurance-related asset on environmental exposures, partially offset by lower transformation costs of $7.8 during 2013. Other corporate costs for 2013 were also impacted by higher compensation and benefit-related costs which include higher annual and long- term incentive plan expenses. 41 INTEREST AND NON-OPERATING EXPENSES, NET Interest expense Interest income Miscellaneous expense (income), net Total interest and non-operating expenses, net 2013 6.3 5.0 1.8 3.1 $ $ 2012 0.1 2.8 5.1 2.4 $ $ Change 6,200.0 % 78.6 % (64.7)% 29.2 % Interest expense increased by $6.2 during 2013, primarily due to a year-over-year unfavorable movement in accrued interest associated with unrecognized tax benefits. Interest income increased by $2.2 during 2013, primarily due to interest received during 2013 in connection with a settlement of legacy receivables and payables with a former ITT entity, partially offset by lower year-over-year interest earned on cash deposit balances. Miscellaneous expenses (income), net decreased $3.3 during 2013, primarily due to a change in the presentation of income from noncontrolling interests. Income from noncontrolling interests was $2.3 during 2012. INCOME TAX EXPENSE For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $309.6 representing an effective tax rate of (171.5)%, compared to income tax expense of $39.6, and an effective tax rate of 26.6% for 2012. Our effective tax rate in 2013 differs from the statutory tax rate primarily as a result of the release of the valuation allowance that was initially recorded in 2011 as discussed below. The significantly lower effective tax rate in 2013 is primarily attributable to the release of the valuation allowance against U.S. deferred tax assets of $374.6. In the third quarter of 2013, the Company moved from a three-year adjusted cumulative domestic pretax loss position to a three-year adjusted cumulative domestic pretax income position. In measuring adjusted cumulative pretax income (loss), the Company adjusted pretax U.S. income (loss) for nonrecurring items and recurring permanent differences. The recurring permanent differences included excess stock option deductions which represented the amount of tax deductions in excess of book deductions, ultimately reducing book income on the tax return, and foreign earnings, the indefinite reinvestment of which was not asserted, and was not expected to be asserted in the foreseeable future, and dividends paid or expected to be paid. Each of these items was recurring in nature and representative of our book taxable income. In addition, we included adjustments for certain non-recurring costs directly attributable to the 2011 spin-off transaction as these were not indicative of future taxable income. The three-year cumulative income position was strong positive evidence in evaluating the realizability of our deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013. However, the Company considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, in its evaluation to reverse the valuation allowance at that time, including future earnings, industry trends, and certain contingencies, such as asbestos-related costs. Further, we considered future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences as a source of income available to recover a portion of existing deferred tax assets, future taxable income exclusive of reversing taxable temporary differences and carryforwards, and available tax-planning strategies in assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets. Based on positive evidence, including the three- year cumulative positive income and the absence of any significant negative evidence, management determined that it was more likely than not that the Company's U.S. deferred tax assets would be realized except for certain deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses and tax credits. The Company established a valuation allowance on foreign net deferred tax assets in Brazil and the U.K, as a result of a cumulative loss. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against certain foreign net deferred tax assets, primarily in Luxembourg, Germany and China. Overall, the increase in the foreign valuation allowance of $29.0 is primarily attributable to foreign net operating loss carryforwards in Luxembourg. Our 2013 effective tax rate also reflected a tax charge of $11.0 for the deferred tax liabilities for the undistributed earnings generated in Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea which are no longer considered to be indefinitely reinvested. We continue to provide deferred taxes on certain undistributed earnings in Luxembourg. We have not provided for deferred taxes on the remaining excess of financial reporting over tax bases of investments in foreign subsidiaries in the amount of $506.6 because we plan to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside the U.S. While the amount of U.S. federal income taxes, if such earnings are distributed in the future, cannot be determined, such taxes may be reduced by tax credits and other tax deductions. 42 EARNINGS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX Income from discontinued operations decreased by $15.1 during 2013 primarily due to the sale of our former shape cutting product lines in 2012 which generated a gain on sale of $9.0. In addition, the 2012 results include a $5.6 benefit from the settlement of an asbestos-related matter, $6.9 of after-tax costs related to the spin-off of Exelis and Xylem, and a tax benefit of $5.9 primarily related to the completion of tax examinations and changes in unrecognized tax benefits. During 2013, income from discontinued operations included a net after-tax loss of $1.3 related to a settlement of legacy receivables and payables with a former ITT entity. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Funding and Liquidity Strategy Our funding needs are monitored and strategies are executed to meet overall liquidity requirements, including the management of our capital structure on both a short- and long-term basis. We expect to fund our ongoing working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, and financing requirements through cash flows from operations and cash on hand or by accessing the commercial paper market. If our access to the commercial paper market were adversely affected, we believe that alternative sources of liquidity, including our 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement, described below, would be sufficient to meet our short-term funding requirements. We manage our worldwide cash requirements considering available funds among the many subsidiaries through which we conduct business and the cost effectiveness with which those funds can be accessed. We have identified and continue to look for opportunities to access cash balances in excess of local operating requirements to meet global liquidity needs in a cost-efficient manner. A majority of our cash and cash equivalents is held by our international subsidiaries. We have and plan to transfer cash between certain international subsidiaries and the U.S. and other international subsidiaries when it is cost effective to do so. Our intent is generally to indefinitely reinvest these funds outside of the U.S., consistent with our overall intention to support growth and expand in markets outside of the U.S. through the development of products, increased in non-U.S. capital spending, and potentially acquire foreign businesses. However, we have determined that certain undistributed foreign earnings generated in Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, and South Korea should not be considered permanently reinvested outside of the U.S. Net distributions from foreign countries totaled $138.5 and $43.9 during 2014 and 2013, respectively. The timing and amount of future remittances, if any, remains under evaluation. The amount and timing of dividends payable on our common stock are within the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and will be based on, and affected by, a number of factors, including our financial position and results of operations, available cash, expected capital spending plans, prevailing business conditions, and other factors the Board deems relevant. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to what level of dividends, if any, will be paid in the future. Aggregate dividends paid in 2014 were $40.7, compared to $36.4 in 2013 and $34.2 in 2012, reflecting per share amounts of $0.44, $0.40, and $0.364, respectively. In the first quarter of 2015, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.1183 per share for shareholders of record on March 13, 2015. During 2014, we repurchased 1.1 shares of ITT common stock at a cost of $50.0 through our share repurchase program. In 2015, subject to the availability and timing of potential acquisitions, we plan to increase our returns to shareholders by repurchasing up to $100 of ITT common stock. Significant factors that affect our overall management of liquidity include our credit ratings, the adequacy of commercial paper and supporting bank lines of credit, and the ability to attract long-term capital on satisfactory terms. We assess these factors along with current market conditions on a continuous basis, and as a result, may alter the mix of our short- and long-term financing when it is advantageous to do so. We access the commercial paper market to supplement the cash flows generated internally to provide additional short-term funding for strategic investments and other funding requirements. We manage our short-term liquidity through the use of our commercial paper program by adjusting the level of commercial paper borrowings as opportunities to deploy additional capital arise and it is cost effective to do so. We did not have any commercial paper outstanding as of December 31, 2014; however we had an average outstanding commercial paper balance of $41.2 during the year. Credit Facilities Effective November 25, 2014, we replaced the four-year revolving $500 credit agreement (the 2011 Revolving Credit Agreement) with a new five-year revolving $500 credit agreement (the 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement). The 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement provides for increases of up to $200 for a possible maximum total of $700 in aggregate principal amount, at the request of the Company and with the consent of the institutions providing such increased 43 commitments. The 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement is intended to provide access to additional liquidity and be a source of alternate funding to the commercial paper program, if needed. Our policy is to maintain unused committed bank lines of credit in an amount greater than outstanding commercial paper balances. Two borrowing options are available under the 2014 Credit Agreement: (i) a competitive advance option and (ii) a revolving credit option. The interest rates for the competitive advance option will be obtained from bids in accordance with competitive auction procedures. The interest rates under the revolving credit option will be based either on LIBOR plus spreads, which reflect the Company’s credit ratings, or on the Administrative Agent’s Alternate Base Rate. The provisions of the 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement require that we maintain an interest coverage ratio, as defined, of at least 3.0 times and a leverage ratio, as defined, of not more than 3.0 times. At December 31, 2014, we had no amounts outstanding under the 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement and our interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio were within the prescribed thresholds. In the event of certain ratings downgrades, the direct and indirect significant U.S. subsidiaries of the Company would be required to guarantee the obligations under the credit facility. Our credit ratings as of December 31, 2014 were as follows: Rating Agency Standard & Poor’s Moody’s Investors Service Fitch Ratings Short-Term Ratings A-3 P-3 F2 Long-Term Ratings BBB- Baa3 A- Please refer to the rating agency websites and press releases for more information. Sources and Uses of Liquidity Our principal source of liquidity is our cash flow generated from operating activities, which provides us with the ability to meet the majority of our short-term funding requirements. The following table summarizes net cash derived from operating, investing, and financing activities for the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012. Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Foreign exchange Total net cash flow (used in) from continuing operations Net cash used in discontinued operations Net change in cash and cash equivalents 2014 $ 244.7 (14.5) (116.6) (31.2) 82.4 (5.7) 76.7 $ $ 2013 $ 226.6 (188.8) (58.3) (0.4) (20.9) (16.3) (37.2) $ $ 2012 $ 247.1 (274.7) (108.0) (4.0) $ (139.6) (5.7) $ (145.3) Net cash provided by operating activities was $244.7 for the year ended December 31, 2014, representing an increase of $18.1, or 8.0%, from the prior year. This growth was primarily driven by increased segment operating income, which increased $60.5 after adjustments for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization. A decline in cash payments related to transformation and repositioning activities of $18.0 and lower net asbestos-related payments of $21.5, also contributed to the year-over-year increase in cash from operating activities. However, these items were partially offset by higher net tax payments of $48.1 and unfavorable changes in accrued expenses of $30.2 and customer advances of $10.6. In addition, during 2014 we made payments of $7.7 associated with an action to move certain production lines from one location to another existing lower cost manufacturing site and develop an ERP global template design. The year-over-year change in working capital balances resulted in lower cash usage of $12.9 during 2014, primarily related to improved cash collections and lower year-end inventory balances due to the timing of certain large, long-term industrial pump projects and inventory reduction plans. Net cash of $226.6 was provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2013, representing a decrease of $20.5 from the prior year, primarily attributable to the collection of a significant 2012 income tax refund which stemmed from an overpayment during 2011. Cash activity related to net income tax payments and refunds resulted in a 2013 year-over-year decline to cash flow from operations of $122.8. This unfavorable impact was offset by an increased source of cash from segment operating income after non-cash adjustments of $67.8. However, the year-over-year change in working capital balances resulted in a higher cash usage of $10.2 during 2013, primarily related to changes in the level of trade receivables and payables. In addition, the year-over-year change in net cash from operating activities benefited from lower global postretirement plan contributions of $59.1 and lower net payments for transformation and repositioning activities of $22.5. In addition, the year-over-year movement included an unfavorable change in corporate accounts receivable of $17.6, primarily related to higher 2012 cash receipts from 44 Xylem and Exelis associated with the Distribution, as well as higher consolidated 2013 restructuring-related cash payments of $7.4. Net cash used in investing activities declined from $188.8 in 2013 to $14.5 in 2014, primarily due to maturities of short-term time deposits that exceeded purchases by $103.6 during 2014. In contrast, during 2013, purchases of short- term time deposits exceeded maturities by $72.0. In addition, capital expenditures were lower by $4.1, or 3.3%, year- over-year, primarily related to our production capacity investments during 2013 and 2014. Capital expenditures during 2014 primarily relate to the production capacity investments in the Motion Technologies segment and the construction of an additional testing and production facility in Seneca Falls, New York for our Industrial Process segment. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $85.9 during 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to the acquisition of Bornemann in the fourth quarter of 2012. Capital expenditures of $122.9 during 2013 reflect an increase of $39.1 from the prior year primarily associated with capacity expansion projects in South Korea, Seneca Falls, New York, and Wuxi, China to support growth in global automotive and energy markets. Net cash from investing activities was also impacted by additional purchases of short-term time deposit investments of $33.8, net of maturities, during 2013 and the sale of the Shape Cutting businesses which generated net proceeds of $38.4 during 2012. Net cash used in financing activities increased by $58.3 in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the prior year primarily due to the repayment of all outstanding commercial paper during 2014, compared to net commercial paper borrowings during 2013. This led to a year-over-year outflow from short-term debt activity of $63.4. Cash from financing activities was also unfavorably impacted by a reduction of $18.0 in proceeds associated with employee stock issuance activity, net of excess tax benefits. However, these items were partially offset by a $27.7 decline in the amount of common stock repurchased during 2014 compared to 2013. In addition, we made dividend payments of $40.7 and $36.4 during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $49.7 in 2013 compared to 2012, primarily due to an increase in net short-term debt borrowings of $50.2 and a $28.9 decrease in share repurchases as compared to the prior year. This year-over-year cash inflow benefit was partially offset by a $20.9 decline in proceeds associated with employee stock issuance activity, net of excess tax benefits. Our average daily outstanding commercial paper balance for the years ended 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $41.2, $47.7, and $10.1, respectively. The maximum outstanding commercial paper during each of those respective years was $100.5, $103.5 and $55.0, respectively. We did not have any outstanding commercial paper as of December 31, 2014. Net cash used related to discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 is primarily related to a settlement payment to a former ITT entity. Net cash used related to discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 is primarily due to the settlement of legacy receivables and payables with a former ITT entity, resulting in a net cash payment by ITT of $15.3. Asbestos Based on the estimated undiscounted asbestos liability as of December 31, 2014 for claims filed or estimated to be filed over the next 10 years, we have estimated that we will be able to recover approximately 39% of the asbestos indemnity and defense costs from our insurers. Actual insurance reimbursements may vary significantly from period to period and the anticipated recovery rate is expected to decline over time due to gaps in our insurance coverage, reflecting uninsured periods, the insolvency of certain insurers, prior settlements with our insurers, and our expectation that certain insurance policies will exhaust within the next 10 years. In the tenth year of our estimate, our insurance recoveries are currently projected to be 25%. Additionally, future recovery rates may be impacted by other factors, such as future insurance settlements, insolvencies, and judicial determinations relevant to our coverage program, which are difficult to predict and subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The Company has negotiated with certain of its excess insurers to reimburse the Company for a portion of its settlement and/or defense costs as incurred, frequently referred to as “coverage-in-place” agreements. Under coverage-in-place agreements, an insurer’s policies remain in force and the insurer undertakes to provide coverage for the Company’s present and future asbestos claims on specified terms and conditions that address, among other things, the share of asbestos claims costs to be paid by the insurer, payment terms, claims handling procedures and the expiration of the insurer’s obligations. The Company has entered into policy buyout agreements with certain insurers confirming the aggregate amount of available coverage under the subject policies and setting forth a schedule for future payments to a Qualified Settlement Fund, to be disbursed for future asbestos costs. Collectively, these agreements are designed to facilitate an orderly resolution and collection of ITT’s insurance and to mitigate issues that insurers may raise regarding their responsibility to respond to claims. 45 As of December 31, 2014, the Company has entered into coverage-in-place agreements and policy buyout agreements representing approximately 55% of our recorded asset. Certain of our primary coverage-in-place agreements are exhausted which may result in higher net cash outflows until excess carriers begin accepting claims for reimbursement. While there are overall limits on the aggregate amount of insurance available to the Company with respect to asbestos claims, with respect to ITT coverage, those overall limits were not reached by the estimated liability recorded by the Company at December 31, 2014. Further, there is uncertainty in estimating when cash payments related to the recorded asbestos liability will be fully expended and such cash payments will continue for a number of years beyond the next 10 years due to the significant proportion of future claims included in the estimated asbestos liability and the delay between the date a claim is filed and when it is resolved. Subject to these inherent uncertainties, it is expected that cash payments related to pending claims and claims to be filed in the next 10 years will extend through approximately 2028. Although asbestos cash outflows can vary significantly from year to year, our current net cash outflows, net of tax benefits, are projected to average $15 to $25 over the next five years, as compared to an average of $11 over the past three annual periods, and increase to an average of approximately $40 to $50 per year over the remainder of the projection period. In light of the uncertainties and variables inherent in the long-term projection of the Company's asbestos exposures and potential recoveries, although it is probable that the Company will incur additional costs for asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, we do not believe that there is a reasonable basis for estimating the number of future claims, the nature of future claims, or the cost to resolve future claims for years beyond the next 10 years at this time. Accordingly, no liability or related asset has been recorded for any costs that may be incurred for claims asserted subsequent to 2024. Due to these uncertainties, as well as our inability to reasonably estimate any additional asbestos liability for claims that may be filed beyond the next 10 years, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of the cost of resolving the pending and estimated unasserted asbestos claims. We believe it is possible that the future events affecting the key factors and other variables within the next 10 years, as well as the cost of asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, net of expected recoveries, could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Funding of Postretirement Plans The following table provides a summary of the funded status of our postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. 2014 2013 Fair value of plan assets Projected benefit obligation Funded status U.S. Pension $ 272.9 324.1 (51.2) $ Non-U.S. Pension 1.0 87.5 (86.5) $ (125.0) $ (262.7) $ (14.4) $ Other Benefits 9.5 $ 134.5 U.S. Pension $ 266.8 281.2 Total $ 283.4 546.1 Other Non-U.S. Total Benefits Pension 278.0 9.2 $ 2.0 84.8 532.6 166.6 (82.8) $ (157.4) $ (254.6) $ $ $ $ The funded status of our U.S. pension plans declined by $36.8 during 2014 due to a reduction in the discount rate and a change in the mortality assumptions. Our non-U.S. pension plans are typically not funded due to local regulations and the funded status as of December 31, 2014 was consistent with that of the prior year. While the Company has significant discretion in making voluntary contributions, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and applicable Internal Revenue Code regulations mandate minimum funding thresholds. Failure to satisfy the minimum funding thresholds could result in restrictions on our ability to amend a plan or make benefit payments. In general, certain benefit restrictions apply when the Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage (AFTAP) of a plan is less than 80%. When the AFTAP is between 80% and 60%, there is a restriction on plan amendments and a partial restriction on accelerated benefit payments (i.e., lump sum payments cannot exceed 50% of the value of the participants total benefit). Full benefit restrictions apply if the plan’s AFTAP falls below 60%. As of December 31, 2014, the funding percentages of all ITT U.S. Qualified pension plans exceeded 80% as calculated using the AFTAP approach. While we make contributions to our postretirement benefit plans when considered necessary or advantageous to do so, the minimum funding requirements established by local government funding or taxing authorities, or established by other agreements, may influence future contributions. Funding requirements under IRS rules are a major consideration in making contributions to our U.S. pension plans. Future minimum funding requirements will depend primarily on the return on plan assets and discount rate, both determined using AFTAP guidelines. Depending on these 46 factors, and the resulting funded status of our U.S. pension plans, the level of future minimum contributions could be material. During 2014 and 2013, we contributed $4.4 and $3.7 to our global pension plans, respectively. We currently estimate that the 2015 contributions to our global pension plans will be approximately $5.0. The funded status of our other benefit plans improved $32.4 during 2014 due to changes in plan design, partially offset by a reduction in the discount rate. We contributed $8.2 to our other employee-related defined benefit plans during both 2014 and 2013. We currently estimate that the 2015 contributions to our other employee-related defined benefit plans will be approximately $11.0. Capital Resources Long-term debt is generally defined as any debt with an original maturity greater than 12 months. As of December 31, 2014, we have sources of long- and short-term funding including access to the capital markets through a commercial paper program and available unused credit lines of $500, as well as general market access to longer- term markets. Our commercial paper program is supported by the 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement and our policy is to maintain unused committed bank lines of credit in an amount greater than outstanding commercial paper balances. The table below provides long-term debt outstanding and capital lease obligations at December 31, 2014 and 2013. Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases Non-current portion of long-term debt and capital leases Total long-term debt and capital leases 2014 1.5 7.0 8.5 $ $ $ 2013 1.8 9.1 $ 10.9 Contractual Obligations ITT’s commitment to make future payments under long-term contractual obligations was as follows, as of December 31, 2014: Contractual Obligations Short and long-term debt, including interest and capital leases Operating leases Purchase obligations(a) Other long-term obligations(b) Total Payments Due By Period Total Less Than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years $ 10.9 147.4 109.6 126.4 $ 394.3 $ $ 2.2 20.4 103.1 16.7 142.4 $ $ 3.9 31.7 6.5 32.8 74.9 $ $ 2.3 24.8 — 32.4 59.5 More Than 5 Years $ $ 2.5 70.5 — 44.5 117.5 In addition to the amounts presented in the table above, we have recorded liabilities for pending asbestos claims and asbestos claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years and uncertain tax positions of $1,223.2 and $131.2, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2014. These amounts have been excluded from the contractual obligations table due to an inability to reasonably estimate the timing of payments in individual years. In addition, while we make contributions to our postretirement benefit plans when considered necessary or advantageous to do so, the minimum funding requirements established by local government funding or taxing authorities, or established by other agreements, may influence future contributions. As such, expected contributions to our postretirement benefit plans have been excluded from the table above. (a) Represents unconditional purchase agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms to purchase goods or services, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Purchase agreements that are cancellable without penalty have been excluded. (b) Other long-term obligations include amounts recorded on our December 31, 2014 Consolidated Balance Sheet, including estimated environmental payments and employee compensation agreements. We estimate, based on historical experience that we will spend between $10 and $15 per year on environmental investigation and remediation. We are contractually required to spend a portion of these monies based on existing agreements with various governmental agencies and other entities. At December 31, 2014, our recorded environmental liability was $89.9. 47 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Off-balance sheet arrangements represent transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements with unconsolidated entities, where an obligation or contingent interest exists. Our off-balance sheet arrangements, as of December 31, 2014, consist of indemnities related to acquisition and disposition agreements and certain third-party guarantees. Indemnities As part of the Distribution, ITT provided certain indemnifications and cross-indemnifications among ITT, Exelis and Xylem, subject to limited exceptions with respect to employee claims. The indemnifications address a variety of subjects, including asserted and unasserted product liability matters (e.g., asbestos claims, product warranties) which relate to products manufactured, repaired and/or sold prior to the Distribution Date. The indemnifications are indefinite. In addition, ITT, Exelis and Xylem agreed to certain cross-indemnifications with respect to other liabilities and obligations. ITT expects Exelis and Xylem to fully perform under the terms of the Distribution Agreement and therefore has not recorded a liability for matters for which we have been indemnified. In addition, both Exelis and Xylem have made asbestos indemnity claims that could give rise to material payments under the indemnity provided by ITT; such claims are included in our estimate of asbestos liabilities. Since ITT’s incorporation in 1920, we have acquired and disposed of numerous entities. The related acquisition and disposition agreements contain various representation and warranty clauses and may provide indemnities for a misrepresentation or breach of the representations and warranties by either party. The indemnities address a variety of subjects; the term and monetary amounts of each such indemnity are defined in the specific agreements and may be affected by various conditions and external factors. Many of the indemnities have expired either by operation of law or as a result of the terms of the agreement. We do not have a liability recorded for these indemnifications and are not aware of any claims or other information that would give rise to material payments under such indemnities. Guarantees We have a number of guarantees, letters of credit and similar arrangements outstanding at December 31, 2014, primarily pertaining to commercial or performance guarantees and insurance matters. We have not recorded any material loss contingencies under these guarantees, letters of credit and similar arrangements as of December 31, 2014 as the likelihood of nonperformance by the underlying obligors is considered remote. From time to time, we may provide certain third-party guarantees that may be affected by various conditions and external factors, some of which could require that payments be made under such guarantees. We do not consider the maximum exposure or current recorded liabilities under our third-party guarantees to be material either individually or in the aggregate. We do not believe such payments would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND NON-GAAP MEASURES Management reviews key performance indicators including revenue, segment operating income and margins, earnings per share, orders growth, and backlog, among others. In addition, we consider certain supplemental measures to be useful to management and investors when evaluating our operating performance for the periods presented. These supplemental measures provide a tool for evaluating our on-going operations and management of assets from period to period. This information can assist investors in assessing our financial performance and measures our ability to generate capital for deployment among competing strategic alternatives and initiatives, including, but not limited to, dividends, acquisitions and share repurchases. These metrics, however, are not measures of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and should not be considered a substitute for measures determined in accordance with GAAP. Our non-GAAP measures exclude from reported results those items that management believes are not indicative of our ongoing performance and reflect how management evaluates our operating results and trends. We consider the following non-GAAP measures, which may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies, to be key performance indicators: 48 • “organic revenue” and “organic orders” are defined as revenue and orders, excluding the impacts of foreign currency fluctuations and acquisitions and divestitures made during the current year. Divestitures include sales of insignificant portions of our business that did not meet the criteria for presentation as a discontinued operation. The period- over-period change resulting from foreign currency fluctuations is estimated using a fixed exchange rate for both the current and prior periods. Reconciliations of organic revenue from revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are provided below. 2013 Revenue Organic growth Acquisitions/(divestitures), net Foreign currency translation Total change in revenue Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Total ITT % Change $ 1,107.4 $ 721.8 $ 395.5 $ 278.2 $ (6.0) $ 2,496.9 118.5 3.0 (20.6) 100.9 44.2 — 3.4 47.6 (1.7) — (1.0) (2.7) 12.8 — (0.5) 12.3 (0.4) — — 173.4 3.0 6.9 % 0.1 % (18.7) (0.7)% (0.4) 157.7 6.3 % 2014 Revenue $ 1,208.3 $ 769.4 $ 392.8 $ 290.5 $ (6.4) $ 2,654.6 2012 Revenue Organic growth Acquisitions/(divestitures), net Foreign currency translation Total change in revenue Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Total ITT % Change $ 955.8 $ 626.2 $ 375.7 $ 277.1 $ (7.0) $ 2,227.8 35.0 122.7 (6.1) 151.6 79.5 — 16.1 95.6 22.3 — (2.5) 19.8 2.0 — (0.9) 1.1 1.1 — (0.1) 1.0 139.9 122.7 6.5 6.3% 5.5% 0.3% 269.1 12.1% 2013 Revenue $ 1,107.4 $ 721.8 $ 395.5 $ 278.2 $ (6.0) $ 2,496.9 Reconciliations of organic orders for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are provided below. 2013 Orders Organic growth Acquisitions/(divestitures), net Foreign currency translation Total change in orders Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Total ITT % Change $ 1,162.0 $ 743.9 $ 400.3 $ 276.0 $ (6.7) $ 2,575.5 69.9 3.0 (20.7) 52.2 49.8 — 3.3 53.1 (11.2) — (0.7) (11.9) 13.8 — (0.6) 13.2 0.9 — — 0.9 123.2 3.0 4.8 % 0.1 % (18.7) (0.7)% 107.5 4.2 % 2014 Orders $ 1,214.2 $ 797.0 $ 388.4 $ 289.2 $ (5.8) $ 2,683.0 2012 Orders Organic growth Acquisitions/(divestitures), net Foreign currency translation Total change in orders Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Eliminations Total ITT % Change $ 954.9 $ 626.3 $ 383.9 $ 283.8 $ (7.1) $ 2,241.8 39.6 172.0 (4.5) 207.1 101.5 — 16.1 117.6 19.0 — (2.6) 16.4 (6.8) — (1.0) (7.8) 0.5 — (0.1) 0.4 153.8 172.0 7.9 6.9% 7.7% 0.3% 333.7 14.9% 2013 Orders $ 1,162.0 $ 743.9 $ 400.3 $ 276.0 $ (6.7) $ 2,575.5 49 • “adjusted segment operating income” is defined as operating income, adjusted to exclude special items that include, but are not limited to, restructuring and asset impairment charges, transformation and repositioning costs, acquisition-related expenses, and other unusual or infrequent items. Special items represent significant charges or credits that impact current results, but may not be related to the Company's ongoing operations and performance. Reconciliations of segment operating income to adjusted segment operating income for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are provided in the tables below. Year Ended December 31, 2014 Segment operating income Restructuring costs Other unusual or infrequent items(a) Adjusted segment operating income Year Ended December 31, 2013 Segment operating income Restructuring costs Transformation and repositioning costs Bornemann acquisition-related expenses Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Total Segment $ 123.9 $ 130.9 $ 22.2 $ 63.5 $ 340.5 4.2 2.3 2.1 — 20.5 9.5 — — 26.8 11.8 $ 130.4 $ 133.0 $ 52.2 $ 63.5 $ 379.1 Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Total Segment $ 112.0 $ 100.3 $ 14.2 $ 55.3 $ 281.8 4.5 3.2 8.6 5.1 1.9 — 17.2 — — 0.4 1.1 — 27.2 6.2 8.6 Adjusted segment operating income $ 128.3 $ 107.3 $ 31.4 $ 56.8 $ 323.8 (a) The adjustments for unusual or infrequent items during 2014 include costs associated with an action to move certain production lines from one location to another existing lower cost manufacturing site, enterprise resource planning (ERP) global template design costs, and foreign exchange-related impacts associated with our operations in Venezuela. • “adjusted income from continuing operations” and “adjusted income from continuing operations per diluted share” are defined as income from continuing operations and income from continuing operations per diluted share, adjusted to exclude special items that include, but are not limited to, asbestos-related costs, transformation and repositioning costs, restructuring costs, certain acquisition-related expenses, income tax settlements or adjustments, and other unusual or infrequent items. Special items represent significant charges or credits, on an after-tax basis, that impact current results, but may not be related to the Company’s ongoing operations and performance. A reconciliation of adjusted income from continuing operations, including adjusted earnings per diluted share, to income from continuing operations and income from continuing operations per diluted share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are provided in the table below. 2014 2013 2012 Income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation $ 188.4 $ 487.7 $ 109.5 Restructuring costs, net of tax benefit of $8.6, $6.2, and $3.6, respectively Transformation and repositioning costs, net of tax benefit of $2.5, $8.9, and $7.5, respectively(b) Net asbestos-related costs, net of tax benefit (expense) of $1.4, $(11.5), and $(17.8), respectively Tax-related special items(c) Other unusual or infrequent items, net of tax of benefit (expense) of $3.9 ,$0.5 , and $(3.3) , respectively(d) Adjusted income from continuing operations Income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation per diluted share Adjusted income from continuing operations per diluted share 19.5 6.4 2.5 3.8 8.2 $ 228.8 $ $ 2.03 2.47 22.2 16.3 21.3 (363.7) 2.5 $ 186.3 $ 5.28 $ 2.02 10.4 14.2 33.1 (5.2) (4.0) $ 158.0 $ $ 1.16 1.68 (b) Transformation costs refer to the costs incurred in connection with activities taken to complete the Distribution and create the revised organizational structure. Repositioning costs primarily consist of costs to exit transition services agreements, IT infrastructure modifications, and other various actions, pursuant to the Distribution. 50 (c) The following table details significant components of the tax-related special items. See Note 5, “Income Taxes,” to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance Return to accrual adjustment Charge on undistributed foreign earnings Impacts of tax audit closure Change in uncertain tax positions Other Net tax-related special items 2014 2.5 (0.9) 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 3.8 $ $ 2013 $ (375.3) $ (2.8) 11.0 1.4 (0.4) 2.4 $ (363.7) $ 2012 29.4 (9.3) — (8.2) (13.9) (3.2) (5.2) (d) Other unusual or infrequent non-operating items, net of tax, for 2014 include costs associated with an action to move certain production lines from one location to another existing lower cost manufacturing site, the Venezuela currency devaluation, and ERP global template design costs. Other unusual or infrequent non-operating items, net of tax, for 2013 include Bornemann integration-related expenses of $5.7, partially offset by a reduction of accrued interest due to tax audits of $3.2. Other unusual or infrequent non-operating items, net of tax, for 2012 include Bornemann integration-related expenses of $5.4, more than offset by a benefit realized upon the initial establishment of an environmental-related asset of $4.1 and a reduction of accrued interest due to tax audits of $5.3. • “adjusted free cash flow” is defined as net cash provided by operating activities less capital expenditures, cash payments for transformation and repositioning costs, restructuring cash payments, net asbestos cash flows and other significant items that impact current results which management believes are not related to our ongoing operations and performance. This non-GAAP financial measure is our primary measure used to monitor cash flow performance. Due to other financial obligations and commitments, including asbestos-related payments, the entire adjusted free cash flow may not be available for discretionary purposes. A reconciliation of free cash flow is provided below. • “adjusted free cash flow conversion” is defined as adjusted free cash flow divided by adjusted income from continuing operations. Net cash from continuing operations Capital expenditures(e) Restructuring cash payments Transformation, repositioning, and other cash payments(f) Net asbestos cash flows Discretionary pension contribution, net of tax Adjusted free cash flow Adjusted income from continuing operations Adjusted free cash flow conversion 2014 2013 2012 $ 244.7 $ 226.6 $ 247.1 (114.5) (118.1) (78.5) 18.6 20.3 3.9 — 17.1 30.6 25.4 — 9.7 53.1 20.1 29.2 $ 173.0 $ 181.6 $ 280.7 228.8 75.6% 186.3 97.5% 158.0 177.7% (e) Capital expenditures represent capital expenditures as reported in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, less capital expenditures associated with transformation and repositioning activities of $4.3, $4.8 and $5.3 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. (f) Other cash payments during 2014 include payments associated with an action to move certain production lines from one location to another existing lower cost manufacturing site and develop a ERP global template design. 51 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with GAAP requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the financial statements are discussed in Note 1, “Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. An accounting policy is deemed critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, if different estimates reasonably could have been used, or if changes to the estimate that are reasonably possible could materially affect the financial statements. Senior management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the Audit Committee of ITT’s Board of Directors. The accounting estimates and assumptions discussed below are those that we consider most critical to fully understanding our financial statements and evaluating our results as they are inherently uncertain, involve the most subjective or complex judgments, include areas where different estimates reasonably could have been used, and the use of an alternative estimate that is reasonably possible could materially affect the financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and other data and assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management believes that the accounting estimates employed and the resulting balances reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements are reasonable; however, actual results could differ materially from our estimates and assumptions. Asbestos Matters ITT, including its subsidiary Goulds Pumps, Inc., has been sued along with many other companies in product liability lawsuits alleging personal injury due to asbestos exposure. These claims allege that certain products sold by us or our subsidiaries prior to 1985 contained a part manufactured by a third party (e.g., a gasket) that contained asbestos. To the extent that these third-party parts may have contained asbestos, it was encapsulated in the gasket (or other) material and was non-friable. In certain other cases, it is alleged that former ITT companies were distributors for other manufacturers’ products that may have contained asbestos. Estimating our exposure to pending asbestos claims and those that may be filed in the future is subject to significant uncertainty and risk as there are multiple variables that can affect the timing, severity, quality, quantity and resolution of claims. The methodology used to project future asbestos costs is based largely on the Company’s experience in a reference period, including the last few years, for claims filed, settled and dismissed, and is supplemented by management’s expectations of the future. This experience is compared to the results of previously conducted epidemiological studies by estimating the number of individuals likely to develop asbestos-related diseases. Those studies were undertaken in connection with an independent analysis of the population of U.S. workers across eleven different industry and occupation categories believed to have been exposed to asbestos. Using information for the industry and occupation categories relevant to the Company, an estimate is developed of the number of claims estimated to be filed against the Company over the next 10 years, as well as the aggregate settlement costs that would be incurred to resolve both pending and estimated future claims based on the average settlement costs by disease during the reference period. In addition, the estimate is augmented for the costs of defending asbestos claims in the tort system using a forecast based on recent experience, as well as discussions with the Company’s external defense counsel. The asbestos liability has not been discounted to present value due to the inability to reliably forecast the timing of future cash flows. The Company retains a consulting firm to assist management in estimating our potential exposure to pending asbestos claims and for claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. The methodology to project future asbestos costs is one in which the underlying assumptions are separately assessed for their reasonableness and then each is used as an input to the liability estimate. Our assessment of the underlying assumptions concludes on one value for each assumption. The liability estimate is most sensitive to assumptions surrounding mesothelioma and lung cancer claims, as together, the estimated costs to resolve pending and estimated future mesothelioma and lung cancer claims represent more than 90% of the estimated asbestos exposure, but only 17% of pending claims. The assumptions related to mesothelioma and lung cancer that are most significant include the number of new claims forecast to be filed against the Company in the future, the projected average settlement costs (including the rate of inflation assumed), the percentage of claims against the Company that are dismissed without a settlement payment, and the cost to defend against filed claims. These assumptions are interdependent, and no one factor predominates in estimating the asbestos liability. While there are other potential inputs to the model used to estimate our asbestos exposures for pending and estimated future claims, our methodology relies on the best input available in the circumstances for each individual assumption and, 52 due to the interdependencies, does not create a range of reasonably possible outcomes. Projecting future asbestos costs is subject to numerous variables and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to predict. In addition to the uncertainties surrounding the key assumptions, additional uncertainty related to asbestos claims arises from the long latency period prior to the manifestation of an asbestos-related disease, changes in available medical treatments and changes in medical costs, changes in plaintiff behavior resulting from bankruptcies of other companies that are potential defendants or co-defendants, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, and the impact of potential legislative or judicial changes. The forecast period used to estimate our potential exposure to pending and projected asbestos claims is a judgment based on a number of factors, including the number and type of claims filed, recent experience with pending claims activity and whether that experience is expected to continue into the future, the jurisdictions where claims are filed, the effect of any legislative or judicial developments, and the likelihood of any comprehensive asbestos legislation at the federal level. These factors have both positive and negative effects on the dynamics of asbestos litigation and, accordingly, on our estimate of the asbestos exposure. Developments related to asbestos tend to be long-cycle, changing over multi-year periods. We closely monitor these and other factors and periodically assess whether an alternative forecast period is appropriate. We record a corresponding asbestos-related asset that represents our best estimate of probable recoveries related to the recorded asbestos liability. In developing this estimate, the Company considers coverage-in-place and other settlement agreements with its insurers, as well as a number of additional factors, including expected levels of future cost recovery, the financial viability of the insurance companies, the method by which losses will be allocated to the various insurance policies and the years covered by those policies, the extent to which settlement and defense costs will be reimbursed by the insurance policies, and interpretation of the various policy and contract terms and limits and their interrelationships. The asbestos-related asset has not been discounted to present value, consistent with the asbestos liability as the timing of the insurance recoveries, including those under coverage-in-place and other settlement agreements, is dependent on the timing of payments of the asbestos liability. The Company retains a consulting firm to assist management in estimating probable recoveries for pending asbestos claims and for claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years based on the analysis of policy terms, the likelihood of recovery provided by external legal counsel assuming the continued viability of those insurance carriers that are currently solvent, incorporating risk mitigation judgments where policy terms or other factors are not certain, and allocating asbestos settlement and defense costs between our insurers. Based on the estimated undiscounted asbestos liability as of December 31, 2014 (for claims filed or estimated to be filed over the next 10 years), we have estimated that we will be able to recover approximately 39% of asbestos indemnity and defense costs from our insurers. However, there is uncertainty in estimating when cash payments related to the recorded asbestos liability will be fully expended and such cash payments will continue for a number of years beyond the next 10 years due to the significant proportion of future claims included in the estimated asbestos liability and the lag time between the date a claim is filed and when it is resolved. Actual insurance reimbursements may vary significantly from period to period and the anticipated recovery rate is expected to decline over time due exhaustion of policies and the insolvency of certain insurers. In the tenth year of our estimate, our insurance recoveries are currently projected to be approximately 25%. Future recovery rates may be impacted by other factors, such as future insurance settlements, unforeseen insolvencies and judicial determinations relevant to our coverage program, which are difficult to predict and subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Our estimated asbestos liability and related receivables are based on management’s best estimate of future events largely based on past experience; however, past experience may not prove a reliable predictor of the future. Future events affecting the key assumptions and other variables for either the asbestos liability or the related receivables could cause actual costs and recoveries to be materially higher or lower than currently estimated. For example, a significant upward or downward trend in the number of claims filed, depending on the nature of the alleged injury, the jurisdiction where filed and the quality of the product identification, or a significant upward or downward trend in the costs of defending claims, could change the estimated liability, as would substantial adverse verdicts at trial that withstand appeal. A legislative solution, structured settlement transaction, or significant change in relevant case law could also change the estimated liability. Further, the bankruptcy of an insurer or settlements with our insurers, whether through coverage-in-place agreements or policy buyouts, could change the estimated amount of recoveries. Furthermore, any predictions with respect to the variables impacting our estimate of the asbestos liability and related asset are subject to even greater uncertainty as the projection period lengthens. In light of the uncertainties and variables inherent in the long-term projection of the Company’s asbestos exposures and potential recoveries, although it is probable that the Company will incur additional costs for asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, we do not believe there is a reasonable basis for estimating the number of future claims, the nature of future claims, 53 or the cost to resolve future claims for years beyond the next 10 years at this time. Accordingly, no accrual or receivable has been recorded for any costs which may be incurred for claims asserted subsequent to 2024. Due to these uncertainties, as well as our inability to reasonably estimate any additional asbestos liability for claims which may be filed beyond the next 10 years, it is not possible to predict the ultimate cost of resolving all pending and estimated unasserted asbestos claims. We believe it is possible that the future events affecting the key factors and other variables within the next 10 years, as well as the cost of asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, net of expected recoveries, could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Revenue Recognition Revenue is derived from the sale of products and services to customers. We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred. For product sales, other than long-term construction and production-type contracts (referred to as design and build arrangements), we recognize revenue at the time title and risks and rewards of ownership pass to the customer, which is generally when products are shipped, and the contractual terms have been fulfilled. Certain contracts with customers require delivery, installation, testing, certification or other acceptance provisions to be satisfied before revenue is recognized. In instances where contractual terms include a provision for customer acceptance, revenue is recognized when either (i) we have previously demonstrated that the product meets the specified criteria based on either seller or customer-specified objective criteria or (ii) on formal acceptance received from the customer where the product has not been previously demonstrated to meet customer-specified objective criteria. We recognize revenue for certain long-term design and build projects using the percentage-of-completion method, based upon the percentage of costs incurred to total projected costs. Revenue and profit recognized under the percentage-of-completion method are based on management’s estimates such as total contract revenues, contract costs and the extent of progress toward completion. Due to the long-term nature of the contracts, these estimates are subject to uncertainties and require significant judgment. Estimates of contract costs include labor hours and rates, and material costs. These estimates consider historical performance, the complexity of the work to be performed, the estimated time to complete the project, and other economic factors such as inflation and market rates. We update our estimates on a periodic basis and any revisions to such estimates are recorded in earnings in the period in which they are determined. Provisions for estimated losses, if any, on uncompleted long-term contracts, are made in the period in which such losses are determined. We recognize revenue on smaller design and build projects, including those of short-term duration, using the completed contract method. Provisions for estimated losses, if any, on uncompleted design and build arrangements, are recognized in the period in which such losses are determined. Due to the long-term nature of the contracts, these estimates are subject to uncertainties and require significant judgment and may consider historical performance, the complexity of the work to be performed, the estimated time to complete the project, and other economic factors such as inflation. Additionally, accruals for estimated expenses related to sales returns and warranties are made at the time products are sold. Reserves for sales returns, rebates and other allowances are established using historical information on the frequency of returns for a particular product and period over which products can be returned. For distributors and resellers, our typical return period is less than 180 days. Future market conditions and product transitions may require us to take actions to increase customer incentive offerings, possibly resulting in a reduction in revenue at the time the incentive is offered. Warranty accruals are established using historical information on the nature, frequency and average cost of warranty claims and estimates of future costs. Our standard product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for a specified period of time. While we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes, we base our estimated warranty obligation on product warranty terms offered to customers, ongoing product failure rates, materials usage, service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure, as well as specific product class failures outside of our baseline experience and associated overhead costs. If actual product failure rates, repair rates or any other post-sales support costs differ from these estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required. 54 Income Taxes Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying currently enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences will reverse. We periodically assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets and reflect any changes to our estimate of the amount we are more likely than not to realize as a valuation allowance, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), as appropriate. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income (including the reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which those deferred tax assets will become deductible. The Company assesses all available positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of its deferred tax assets. Significant judgment is required in assessing the need for any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, taxable income in carryback periods, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, estimated future taxable income, and whether we have a recent history of losses. The valuation allowance can be affected by changes to tax regulations, interpretations and rulings, changes to enacted statutory tax rates, and changes to future taxable income estimates. Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of certain undistributed foreign earnings for which we have not provided U.S. taxes because we plan to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the U.S. We plan foreign earnings remittance amounts based on projected cash flow needs, as well as the working capital and long-term investment requirements of our foreign subsidiaries and our domestic operations. Based on these assumptions, we estimate the amount we will distribute to the U.S. and accrue U.S. federal taxes on these planned foreign remittance amounts. Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we do business could impact our effective tax rate. Our provision for income taxes could be adversely impacted by changes in our geographic mix of earnings or changes in the enacted tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The calculation of our deferred and other tax balances involves significant management judgment when dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations and rulings in a multitude of taxing jurisdictions across our global operations. The Company is routinely audited by U.S. federal, state and foreign tax authorities, the results of which could result in proposed assessments against the Company. We recognize potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. Furthermore, we recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position in consideration of applicable tax statutes and related interpretations and precedents and the expected outcome of the proceedings (or negotiations) with the taxing authorities. Tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized on ultimate settlement. We adjust our liability for uncertain tax positions in light of changing facts and circumstances; however, the ultimate resolution of a tax examination may differ from the amounts recorded in the financial statements for a number of reasons, including the Company’s decision to settle rather than litigate a matter, relevant legal precedent related to similar matters, and the Company’s success in supporting its filing positions with the tax authorities. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves different than the ultimate outcome, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. Postretirement Plans ITT sponsors numerous defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans for employees around the world (collectively, postretirement benefit plans). Postretirement benefit obligations for domestic plans are generally determined on a flat dollar benefit formula and years of service. Foreign plan benefit obligations are primarily determined based on participant years of service, future compensation, and age at retirement or termination. The determination of projected benefit obligations and the recognition of expenses related to postretirement benefit plans are dependent on various assumptions that are judgmental and developed in consultation with our actuaries and other advisors. The assumptions involved in the measurement of our postretirement benefit plan obligations and net periodic postretirement costs primarily relate to discount rates, long-term expected rates of return on plan assets, and mortality and termination rates. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and are amortized over the estimated future working life, or remaining lifetime, of the plan participants depending on the nature of the retirement plan. See Note 15, “Postretirement Benefit Plans,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed information regarding our postretirement plan assumptions. 55 Assumption Sensitivity We estimate that every twenty-five basis point change in the discount rate impacts net periodic postretirement costs by approximately $0.7 and the funded status of our postretirement benefit plans by approximately $16.3. We estimate that every twenty-five basis point change in the expected rate of return on plan assets impacts net periodic postretirement costs by approximately $0.7. Similarly, every five percentage point change in the fair value of plan assets impacts the funded status by approximately $14.2. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets We review goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. We also review the carrying value of our finite-lived intangible assets for potential impairment when impairment indicators arise. We conduct our annual impairment tests as of the first day of the fourth quarter. When reviewing for impairment, we may opt to make an initial qualitative evaluation, which considers present events and circumstances, to determine the likelihood of impairment. Our decision to perform a qualitative impairment assessment for an individual reporting unit in a given year is influenced by a number of factors, including the significance of the excess of the reporting unit's estimated fair value over carrying value at the last quantitative assessment date, changes in macroeconomic, industry and reporting-unit specific conditions and the amount of time in between quantitative fair value measurements. If the likelihood of impairment is not considered to be more likely than not, then no further testing is performed. In cases when we opt not to perform a qualitative evaluation or the qualitative evaluation indicates that the likelihood of impairment is more likely than not, we then perform a two-step impairment test for goodwill. In the first step, we compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit, goodwill is not impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then we must perform the second step of the impairment test in order to measure the impairment loss to be recorded, if any. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference. In our annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets, we compare the fair value of those assets to their carrying value. We recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using an income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. We estimate the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets using the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method estimates the portion of a company’s earnings attributable to an intellectual property asset based on an assumed royalty rate that the company would have paid had the asset not been owned. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, particularly related to future operating results and cash flows. These estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, assumed royalty rates, future economic and market conditions and the identification of appropriate market comparable data. In addition, the identification of reporting units and the allocation of assets and liabilities to the reporting units when determining the carrying value of each reporting unit also requires judgment. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level, which, based on the applicable accounting guidance, is either the operating segment or one level below (e.g., the divisions of our Control Technology segment). The fair value of our reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets are based on estimates and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable. Significant changes to these estimates and assumptions could adversely impact our conclusions. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. Further, had different reporting units been identified or had different valuation techniques or assumptions been utilized, the results of our impairment tests could have resulted in an impairment loss, which could have been material. In 2014, a qualitative assessment was performed for all reporting units and it was determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. 56 Environmental Liabilities We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations that require environmental assessment or remediation efforts. Accruals for environmental exposures are recorded on a site-by- site basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, based on current law and existing technologies. Significant judgment is required to determine both the likelihood of a loss and the estimated amount of loss. Engineering studies, probability techniques, historical experience and other factors are used to identify and evaluate remediation alternatives and their related costs in estimating our reserve for environmental liabilities. Our environmental reserve of $89.9 at December 31, 2014, represents management’s estimate of undiscounted costs expected to be incurred related to environmental assessment or remediation efforts, as well as related legal fees, without regard to potential recoveries from insurance companies or other third parties. Our estimated liability is reduced to reflect the participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective share of the relevant costs. Our environmental accruals are reviewed and adjusted for progress of investigation and remediation efforts and as additional technical or legal information become available, such as the impact of negotiations with regulators and other potentially responsible parties, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other current information. We closely monitor our environmental responsibilities, together with trends in the environmental laws. Environmental remediation reserves are subject to numerous inherent uncertainties that affect our ability to estimate our share of the costs. Such uncertainties involve incomplete information regarding particular sites and other potentially responsible parties, uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of contamination at each site, the extent of remediation required under existing regulations, our share of any remediation liability, if any, widely varying cost estimates associated with potential alternative remedial approaches, the length of time required to remediate a particular site, the potential effects of continuing improvements in remediation technology, and changes in environmental standards and regulatory requirements. While environmental laws and regulations are subject to change, the nature of such change is inherently unpredictable and the timing of potential changes is uncertain. The effect of legislative or regulatory changes on environmental standards could be material to the Company’s financial statements. Additionally, violations by us of such laws and regulations, discovery of previously unknown or more extensive contamination, litigation involving environmental impacts, our inability to recover costs associated with any such developments, or financial insolvency of other potentially responsible parties could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the ultimate costs of environmental remediation, the reasonably possible high-end range of our estimated environmental liability at December 31, 2014 was $160.3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements See Note 2, “Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of recent accounting pronouncements. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial position. The impact from changes in market conditions is generally minimized through our normal operating and financing activities. However, we may use derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts, interest rate swaps and futures contracts, to manage some of these exposures. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes. To minimize the risk of counterparty non-performance, derivative instruments are entered into with major financial institutions and there is no significant concentration with any one counterparty. A summary of our accounting policies for derivatives is included in Note 1, “Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Exposures Our foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to receipts from customers, payments to suppliers and intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2014, we had a total of three derivative contracts in place with an aggregate notional amount of $5.4 and related net fair value less than $0.1. These forward contracts are all short-term in duration. The derivative contracts offset specific risks related to receipts from customers and intercompany transactions. Our principal currency exposures relate to the Euro, Chinese renminbi, South Korean won, Hong Kong dollar, Mexican peso, British pound, Czech koruna, Brazilian real, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, and Russian ruble. In addition, the Company is exposed to the Venezuelan bolivar, which it ceased using the functional currency of its Venezuelan operations in 2010. 57 Based on a sensitivity analysis at December 31, 2014, a hypothetical 10% change in the foreign currency exchange rates for the year ended December 31, 2014 would have resulted in translation impact to our pre-tax earnings of approximately $20, due primarily to the Euro. This calculation assumes that all currencies change in the same direction and proportion relative to the U.S. dollar and that there are no indirect effects, such as changes in non-U.S. dollar sales volumes or prices. This calculation does not take into account the impact of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts discussed above. Effective January 1, 2010, Venezuela was determined to be a highly inflationary economy and we changed the functional currency of our operations in Venezuela to the U.S. dollar. On February 8, 2013, Venezuela announced a devaluation of the Bolivar which resulted in our recognition of a $1.2 remeasurement charge. During the first quarter of 2014, the Venezuelan government began publishing average exchange rates resulting from two different currency auctions authorized by the government. Therefore, as of December 31, 2014, an entity may be able to convert Venezuelan bolivar fuertes (BsF) to U.S. dollars (USD) at one of three legal exchange rates: the Official Rate of 6.3 BsF to 1 USD, the initial auction (SICAD 1) rate of 12.0 BsF to 1 USD, and a second auction rate that is intended to more closely resemble a market-driven exchange (SICAD 2) rate of 50.0 BsF to 1 USD. Our business in Venezuela is in the oil and gas market. We have previously received approval to transact at the Official Rate and in September 2014 we received a $0.2 payment at the Official Rate and as a result prior to December 31, 2014 it was our belief that we would be able to continue to exchange at the Official Rate. However, due to our limited ability to exchange at the Official Rate recently and recent economic turmoil, we now believe that the SICAD 2 Rate represents the best estimate of what the Company will be able to exchange at in the future. Therefore, on December 31, 2014, we remeasured the financial statements of our Venezuelan subsidiary at 50 BsF to 1 USD which resulted in a charge of $1.1, of which $0.6 is presented within G&A expense and $0.5 is presented within tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest Rate Exposures As of December 31, 2014, our outstanding long-term debt was $7.1; as such we do not currently have a material exposure to interest rate risk. As of December 31, 2014, we had two interest rate swaps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $3.3 and a fair value of $0.5. These interest rate swap agreements modify our exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of the floating-rate debt to a fixed rate. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded in earnings as the interest rate swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting. Commodity Price Exposures Portions of our business are exposed to volatility in the prices of certain commodities, such as steel, gold, copper, nickel, iron, aluminum and tin, as well as specialty alloys, including titanium. Our primary exposure to commodity price volatility resides with the use of these materials in purchased component parts. We generally maintain long-term fixed price contracts on raw materials and component parts; however, we are prone to exposure as these contracts expire. We evaluate hedging opportunities to mitigate or minimize the risk of operating margin erosion resulting from the volatility of commodity prices. We estimate that a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in prices for raw metal commodities would not be material to the financial statements. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements herein. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. 58 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Attached as exhibits to the Form 10-K are certifications of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act, as amended. (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company, with the participation of various levels of management, including the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2014. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. The Company's Disclosure Committee has the responsibility of considering and evaluating the materiality of information and reviewing disclosure obligations on a timely basis. The Disclosure Committee meets regularly and assists the CEO and the CFO in designing, establishing, reviewing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, completely, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; (iii) provide reasonable assurance that Company receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with the authorization of management and the directors of the Company, and (iv) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements. Internal control over financial reporting includes the controls themselves, monitoring and internal auditing practices and actions taken to correct deficiencies as identified. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. The Company adopted the updated internal control framework released by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The framework is referred to as the COSO 2013 Internal Control Framework (COSO 2013), and is a replacement of the 1992 "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued previously by COSO and utilized by most companies, including ITT, up to December 31, 2013. Management’s assessment under COSO 2013 included an evaluation of the design of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Based on this assessment, management determined that, as of December 31, 2014, the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, does not expect that our internal controls over financial reporting, because of inherent limitations, will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management’s assessment, included herein, should be read in conjunction with the certifications and the report issued by Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte & Touche), an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears subsequent to Item 9B in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting During the three months ended December 31, 2014, no change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. On May 14, 2013, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) published an updated Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) and related illustrative documents. The company adopted the new framework in 2014. 59 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION Disclosure pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction & Syria Human Rights Act (ITRA) This disclosure is made pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, codified as Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, which requires a reporting company to disclose in its annual and quarterly reports whether it or any of its affiliates have knowingly engaged in specified activities or transactions relating to Iran, including activities conducted outside of the United States by non-U.S. affiliates in compliance with local law. In its 2012 Annual Report, ITT described its acquisition of all the shares of Bornemann in November 2012, as well as certain activities of Bornemann in Iran and the wind down of those activities in accordance with a General License issued on December 26, 2012 (the General License) by OFAC. As permitted by the General License, on or before March 8, 2013, Bornemann completed the wind-down activities and ceased all activities in Iran. As required to be disclosed by Section 13(r), the gross revenues and operating income to Bornemann from its Iranian activities subsequent to its acquisition by ITT were Euros 2.2 million and Euros 1.5 million, respectively. Prior to its acquisition by ITT, Bornemann issued a performance bond to its Iranian customer in the amount of Euros 1.3 million (the Bond). Bornemann requested that the Bond be canceled prior to March 8, 2013; however, the former customer refused this request and as a result the Bond remains outstanding. Bornemann did not receive gross revenues or operating income, or pay interest, with respect to the performance bond in either 2014 or 2013, however, Bornemann did pay fees in 2014 and 2013 of approximately Euros 11 and 43 thousand, respectively to the German financial institution which is maintaining the performance bond. In connection with certain activities that could not be finalized on or before March 8, 2013, ITT received a Special License from OFAC in June 2014 in order to conclude a settlement with an agent associated with Bornemann’s Iranian activities. The settlement agreement has been finalized and payments totaling Euro 770 thousand were made to the agent in 2014. 60 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of ITT Corporation White Plains, New York We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of ITT Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 of the Company and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Stamford, Connecticut February 20, 2015 61 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the information provided under the sections entitled “Proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting-Item 1. Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance and Related Matters-Board and Committee Membership-Audit Committee,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Audit Committee Report” in our Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (2015 Proxy Statement). Information required by this Item 10 with respect to executive officers of the Company is contained under the heading “Executive Officers of the Company” in Part I of this Form 10-K. ITT has adopted corporate governance principles and charters for each of its standing committees. The principles address director qualification standards, election and selection of an independent presiding director, as well as responsibilities, access to management and independent advisors, compensation, orientation and continuing education, management succession principles and board and committee self-evaluation. The corporate governance principles and charters are available on the Company’s website at www.itt.com/investors/governance/. A copy of the corporate governance principles and charters is also available to any shareholder who requests a copy from the Company’s secretary. ITT has also adopted a written code of ethics, the “Code of Conduct,” which is applicable to all directors, employees and officers (including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or person performing similar functions). The Company’s Code of Conduct is available on our website at www.itt.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Conduct by posting such information on our website at www.itt.com. Pursuant to New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listing Company Manual Section 303A.12(a), the Company submitted a Section 12(a) CEO Certification to the NYSE in 2014. The Company also filed with the SEC, as exhibits to the Company’s current Annual Report on Form 10-K, the certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act for its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the discussion under the headings “2014 Non- Management Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Corporate Governance and Related Matters-Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our 2015 Proxy Statement. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the discussion under the caption “Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers, and Certain Shareholders” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our 2015 Proxy Statement. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the discussions under the captions “Corporate Governance and Related Matters-Policies for Approving Related Party Transactions” and “Corporate Governance and Related Matters-Director Independence,” in our 2015 Proxy Statement. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES Information about the fees for 2014 and 2013 for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm is incorporated by reference to the discussion under the heading “Proposal 2. Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” of our 2015 Proxy Statement. Our Audit Committee’s policy on pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services of our independent registered public accounting firm is also incorporated by reference to the discussion under the heading “Proposal 2. Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” of our 2015 Proxy Statement. 62 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) Documents filed as a part of this report: 1. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on page 64 for a list of the financial statements filed as a part of this report. 2. See Exhibit Index beginning on pages II-3 for a list of the exhibits filed or incorporated herein as a part of this report. (b) Financial Statement Schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report. 63 INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ITEM Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements: Note 1 – Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements Note 3 – Segment Information Note 4 – Restructuring Actions Note 5 – Income Taxes Note 6 – Earnings Per Share Note 7 – Receivables, Net Note 8 – Inventories, Net Note 9 – Other Current and Non-Current Assets Note 10 – Plant, Property and Equipment, Net Note 11 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net Note 12 – Accrued Liabilities and Other Non-Current Liabilities Note 13 – Leases and Rentals Note 14 – Debt Note 15 – Postretirement Benefit Plans Note 16 – Long-Term Incentive Employee Compensation Note 17 – Capital Stock Note 18 – Commitments and Contingencies Note 19 – Guarantees, Indemnities and Warranties Note 20 – Discontinued Operations Note 21 – Acquisitions Supplemental Financial Data: Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) PAGE 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 71 78 79 81 82 86 87 87 87 88 88 89 90 90 91 97 101 101 105 106 107 108 64 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of ITT Corporation White Plains, New York We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ITT Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and shareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ITT Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 20, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Stamford, Connecticut February 20, 2015 65 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 Revenue Costs of revenue Gross profit Sales and marketing expenses General and administrative expenses Research and development expenses Asbestos-related costs, net Operating income Interest expense Interest income Miscellaneous expense (income), net Income from continuing operations before income tax Income tax expense (benefit) Income from continuing operations (Loss) income from discontinued operations, including tax benefit of $4.8, $0.2, and $5.9, respectively Net income Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 2014 $ 2,654.6 1,788.2 866.4 219.4 300.1 76.6 3.9 266.4 4.0 2.5 2.9 262.0 71.3 190.7 (3.9) 186.8 2.3 2013 $ 2,496.9 1,697.1 799.8 216.2 299.9 67.3 32.8 183.6 6.3 5.0 1.8 180.5 (309.6) 490.1 0.8 490.9 2.4 2012 $ 2,227.8 1,547.6 680.2 180.4 234.7 62.7 50.9 151.5 0.1 2.8 5.1 149.1 39.6 109.5 15.9 125.4 — Net income attributable to ITT Corporation $ 184.5 $ 488.5 $ 125.4 Amounts attributable to ITT Corporation: Income from continuing operations, net of tax $ 188.4 $ 487.7 $ 109.5 (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax (3.9) 0.8 15.9 Net income $ 184.5 $ 488.5 $ 125.4 Earnings (loss) per share attributable to ITT Corporation: Basic Earnings Per Share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income Diluted Earnings Per Share: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income Weighted average common shares – basic Weighted average common shares – diluted $ $ $ $ 2.06 (0.04) 2.02 2.03 (0.04) 1.99 91.5 92.8 $ $ $ $ 5.36 0.01 5.37 5.28 0.01 5.29 91.0 92.3 $ $ $ $ 1.18 0.17 1.35 1.16 0.17 1.33 93.0 94.1 Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.44 $ 0.40 $ 0.364 The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the above statements of operations. 66 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (IN MILLIONS) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 Net income Other comprehensive income (loss): 2014 $ 186.8 2013 $ 490.9 2012 $ 125.4 Net foreign currency translation adjustment Net change in postretirement benefit plans, net of tax impacts of $2.6, ($38.8), and $0, respectively Net change in unrealized loss on investment securities, net of tax impacts of $0, $0, and $1.0, respectively Other comprehensive (loss) income Comprehensive income Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests Comprehensive income attributable to ITT Corporation (95.9) (15.0) — (110.9) 75.9 2.3 $ 73.6 10.9 66.3 — 77.2 568.1 2.4 $ 565.7 4.7 (42.3) 1.0 (36.6) 88.8 — $ 88.8 Disclosure of reclassification adjustments and other adjustments to postretirement benefit plans Reclassification adjustments: Amortization of prior service (benefit) costs, net of tax expense (benefit) of $2.2, $(0.1), and $0, respectively (See Note 15) $ (3.8) $ 0.3 $ 0.8 Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax benefit of $(3.1), $(4.8), and $0, respectively (See Note 15) 6.3 8.5 10.9 Other adjustments: Prior service credit, net of tax expense of $(19.7), $(7.1), and $0, respectively Net actuarial (loss) gain, net of tax benefit (expense) of $23.2, $(26.8), and $0, respectively Unrealized change from foreign currency translation 34.5 (53.8) 1.8 11.9 46.1 (0.5) 3.1 (56.7) (0.4) Net change in postretirement benefit plans, net of tax $ (15.0) $ 66.3 $ (42.3) Disclosure of reclassification adjustments and other adjustments to unrealized loss on investment securities Reclassification adjustments: Realized losses arising during the period, net of tax expense of $0, $0, and $1.0, respectively Net change in unrealized loss on investment securities, net of tax $ $ — — $ $ — — $ $ 1.0 1.0 The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the statements of comprehensive income. 67 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) DECEMBER 31 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Receivables, net Inventories, net Other current assets Total current assets Plant, property and equipment, net Goodwill Other intangible assets, net Asbestos-related assets Deferred income taxes Other non-current assets Total non-current assets Total assets Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Total current liabilities Asbestos-related liabilities Postretirement benefits Other non-current liabilities Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities Shareholders’ Equity: Common stock: Authorized – 250 shares, $1 par value per share (104.3 and 104.0 shares issued, respectively) Outstanding – 91.0 shares Retained earnings Accumulated other comprehensive loss: Postretirement benefit plans Cumulative translation adjustments Unrealized loss on investment securities Total ITT Corporation shareholders' equity Noncontrolling interests Total shareholders’ equity 2014 2013 $ 584.0 500.1 302.3 249.8 1,636.2 443.9 632.1 91.4 374.0 304.1 149.8 1,995.3 $ 507.3 496.7 315.9 345.6 1,665.5 426.2 659.8 106.9 433.3 303.6 144.9 2,074.7 $ 3,631.5 $ 3,740.2 $ 309.6 465.8 775.4 1,116.6 249.7 269.5 1,635.8 2,411.2 $ 332.7 499.9 832.6 1,179.6 243.3 277.8 1,700.7 2,533.3 91.0 1,445.1 (144.2) (176.7) (0.3) 1,214.9 5.4 1,220.3 91.0 1,320.3 (129.2) (80.8) (0.3) 1,201.0 5.9 1,206.9 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 3,631.5 $ 3,740.2 The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the above balance sheets. 68 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN MILLIONS) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 Operating Activities Net income Less: (Loss) income from discontinued operations Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests Income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation Adjustments to income from continuing operations Depreciation and amortization Stock-based compensation Asbestos-related costs, net Deferred income taxes Asbestos-related payments, net Contributions to postretirement plans Changes in assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions): Change in receivables Change in inventories Change in accounts payable Change in accrued expenses Change in accrued income taxes Other, net Net Cash – Operating activities Investing Activities Capital expenditures Purchases of investments Maturities of investments Acquisitions, net of cash acquired Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations and other assets Other, net Net Cash – Investing activities Financing Activities Short-term debt, net Long-term debt repaid Long-term debt issued Proceeds from issuance of common stock Repurchase of common stock Excess tax benefit from equity compensation activity Dividends paid Other, net Net Cash – Financing activities Exchange rate effects on cash and cash equivalents Discontinued operations: Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Net Cash – Discontinued operations Net change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year Cash and Cash Equivalents – End of Period Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures Cash paid (received) during the year for: Interest Income taxes, net of refunds received ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES 2014 2013 2012 $ 186.8 (3.9) 2.3 188.4 $ 490.9 0.8 2.4 487.7 $ 125.4 15.9 — 109.5 88.3 14.0 3.9 (0.2) (3.9) (12.6) (45.1) (3.1) (5.8) (5.2) (10.4) 36.4 244.7 (118.8) (165.4) 269.0 (2.8) 3.7 (0.2) (14.5) (38.0) (1.7) — 15.1 (60.2) 10.4 (40.7) (1.5) (116.6) (31.2) 86.9 13.1 32.8 (364.0) (25.4) (11.9) (60.7) (10.7) 4.5 35.6 28.6 10.1 226.6 (122.9) (240.2) 168.2 0.7 2.3 3.1 (188.8) 25.4 (6.4) — 34.8 (87.9) 8.7 (36.4) 3.5 (58.3) (0.4) 71.1 12.4 50.9 34.1 (20.1) (71.0) (17.7) (8.7) (4.3) (44.4) 84.1 51.2 247.1 (83.8) (38.2) — (193.2) 39.5 1.0 (274.7) (24.8) (1.0) 1.3 58.0 (116.8) 6.4 (34.2) 3.1 (108.0) (4.0) (5.7) — — (5.7) 76.7 507.3 $ 584.0 (16.3) — — (16.3) (37.2) 544.5 $ 507.3 (3.2) (0.1) (2.4) (5.7) (145.3) 689.8 $ 544.5 $ 1.1 70.0 $ 0.9 21.9 $ 2.3 (100.9) The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the above statements of cash flows. 69 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (IN MILLIONS) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 Common Stock Common stock, beginning balance Activity from stock incentive plans Share repurchases Common stock, ending balance Retained Earnings Retained earnings, beginning balance Net income Cash dividends declared on common stock Activity from stock incentive plans Share repurchases Purchase of noncontrolling interest Distribution of Exelis and Xylem Retained earnings, ending balance Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Postretirement benefit plans, beginning balance Net change in postretirement benefit plans Postretirement benefit plans, ending balance Cumulative translation adjustment, beginning balance Net cumulative translation adjustment Cumulative translation adjustments, ending balance Unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities, beginning balance Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities Unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities, ending balance Total accumulated other comprehensive loss Noncontrolling Interests Noncontrolling interests, beginning balance Reclassification of noncontrolling interests Income attributable to noncontrolling interests Purchase of noncontrolling interests Other Noncontrolling interests, ending balance Total Shareholders’ Equity Total shareholders’ equity, beginning balance Net change in common stock Net change in retained earnings Net change in accumulated other comprehensive loss Net change in noncontrolling interests Total shareholders’ equity, ending balance SHARES 2013 2014 2012 2014 DOLLARS 2013 91.0 1.4 (1.4) 91.0 91.9 2.3 (3.2) 91.0 93.1 $ 4.0 (5.2) 91.9 $ 91.0 $ 1.4 (1.4) 91.0 $ 91.9 $ 2.3 (3.2) 91.0 $ $ 1,320.3 $ 898.8 $ 184.5 (40.6) 38.2 (58.8) 1.5 — 488.5 (36.7) 54.4 (84.7) — — $ 1,445.1 $1,320.3 $ 2012 93.1 4.0 (5.2) 91.9 852.6 125.4 (34.2) 74.1 (111.6) (0.2) (7.3) 898.8 $ (129.2) $ (195.5) $ (153.2) (42.3) $ (144.2) $ (129.2) $ (195.5) (15.0) 66.3 $ (80.8) $ (91.7) $ (95.9) 10.9 $ (176.7) $ (80.8) $ (96.4) 4.7 (91.7) $ (0.3) $ (0.3) $ (1.3) — — 1.0 (0.3) $ $ (0.3) $ (321.2) $ (210.3) $ (287.5) (0.3) $ $ $ 5.9 $ — 2.3 (2.9) 0.1 5.4 $ — $ 3.9 2.4 — (0.4) 5.9 $ — — — — — — $ 1,206.9 $ 703.2 $ — 124.8 (110.9) (0.5) (0.9) 421.5 77.2 5.9 $ 1,220.3 $1,206.9 $ 694.8 (1.2) 46.2 (36.6) — 703.2 The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of the above statements of changes in shareholders’ equity. 70 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (DOLLARS AND SHARE AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED) NOTE 1 DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Description of Business ITT Corporation is a diversified manufacturer of highly engineered critical components and customized technology solutions for the energy, transportation, and industrial markets. Unless the context otherwise indicates, references herein to “ITT,” “the Company,” and such words as “we,” “us,” and “our” include ITT Corporation and its subsidiaries. ITT operates through four segments: Industrial Process, consisting of industrial pumping and complementary equipment; Motion Technologies, consisting of friction and shock & vibration equipment; Interconnect Solutions, consisting of electronic connectors; and Control Technologies, consisting of fluid handling, motion control and vibration and shock isolation products. Financial information for our segments is presented in Note 3, “Segment Information.” On October 31, 2011, ITT completed the tax-free spin-off (referred to herein as the Distribution) of its Defense and Information Solutions business, Exelis Inc. (Exelis), and its water-related businesses, Xylem Inc. (Xylem) by way of a distribution of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Exelis common stock and Xylem common stock, on a pro rata basis, to ITT shareholders of record on October 17, 2011. Portions of this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer to agreements, transactions, and costs related to the Distribution. Basis of Presentation The Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are revised as additional information becomes available. Estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, asbestos-related liabilities and recoveries from insurers, revenue recognition, unrecognized tax benefits, deferred tax valuation allowances, projected benefit obligations for postretirement plans, accounting for business combinations, goodwill and other intangible asset impairment testing, environmental liabilities and recoveries from insurers, allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory valuation. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all majority-owned subsidiaries. ITT consolidates companies in which it has a controlling financial interest or when ITT is considered the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. We account for investments in companies over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but do not hold a controlling interest under the equity method, and we record our proportionate share of income or losses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The results of companies acquired or disposed of during the fiscal year are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the effective date of acquisition or up to the date of disposal or distribution. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Revenue Recognition Revenue is derived from the sale of products and services to customers. The following revenue recognition policies describe the manner in which we account for different classes of revenue transactions. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For product sales, other than long-term construction and production-type contracts (referred to as design and build arrangements), we recognize revenue at the time title and risks and rewards of ownership pass to the customer, which is generally when products are shipped, and the contractual terms have been fulfilled. Certain contracts with customers require delivery, installation, testing, certification or other acceptance provisions to be satisfied before revenue is recognized. In instances where contractual terms include a provision for customer acceptance, revenue is recognized when either (i) we have previously demonstrated that the product meets the specified criteria based on either seller or customer-specified objective criteria or (ii) on formal acceptance received from the customer where the product has not been previously demonstrated to meet customer-specified objective criteria. 71 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES We recognize revenue on product sales to channel partners, including resellers, distributors or value-added solution providers at the time of sale when the channel partners have economic substance apart from ITT and ITT has completed its obligations related to the sale. Revenue on service and repair contracts is recognized after services have been agreed to by the customer and rendered or over the service period. For multiple deliverable arrangements, we recognize revenue based on the relative selling price if the deliverable has stand-alone value to the customer and, in arrangements that include a general right of return relative to the delivered element, performance of the undelivered element is considered probable and substantially in the Company’s control. The selling price for a deliverable is based on vendor-specific objective evidence of selling price (VSOE), if available, third-party evidence of selling price (TPE), if VSOE is not available, or best estimated selling price (BESP), if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. The deliverables in our arrangements with multiple elements include various products and may include related services, such as installation and start-up services. We allocate arrangement consideration based on the relative selling prices of the separate units of accounting determined in accordance with the hierarchy described above. For deliverables that are sold separately, we establish VSOE based on the price when the deliverable is sold separately. We establish TPE, generally for services, based on prices similarly situated customers pay for similar services from third party vendors. For those deliverables for which we are unable to establish VSOE or TPE, we estimate the selling price considering various factors including market and pricing trends, geography, product customization, and profit objectives. Revenue for multiple element arrangements is recognized when the appropriate revenue recognition criteria for the individual deliverable have been satisfied. We recognize revenue for certain long-term design and build projects using the percentage-of-completion method, based upon the percentage of costs incurred to total projected costs. Revenue and profit recognized under the percentage-of-completion method are based on management’s estimates. Amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue, until the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. Revenue that is earned and recognized in excess of amounts invoiced is recorded as a component of receivables, net. During the performance of long-term sales contracts, estimated final contract prices and costs are reviewed quarterly and revisions are made as required and recorded in income in the period in which they are determined. We continue to apply the completed-contract method of accounting for smaller design and build contracts, including those of short-term duration. Amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as a reduction of inventory to the extent project costs have accumulated within inventory or as deferred revenue, within accrued liabilities, until the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied. Our results of operations and financial position would not vary materially had we used the percentage-of-completion method for these types of contracts. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted design and build arrangements are recognized in the period in which such losses are determined. Provisions for estimated losses are recorded as a component of costs of revenue. We record a reduction in revenue at the time of sale for estimated product returns, rebates and other allowances, based on historical experience and known trends. Revenue is reported net of any required taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities, with the collected taxes recorded as current liabilities until remitted to the relevant government authority. Shipping and Handling Costs Shipping and handling costs are recorded as a component of costs of revenue. Product Warranties Our standard product warranty terms generally include post-sales support and repairs or replacement of a product at no additional charge for a specified period of time. Accruals for estimated expenses related to product warranties are made at the time revenue is recognized and are recorded as a component of costs of revenue. We estimate the liability for warranty claims based on our standard warranties, the historical frequency of claims and the cost to replace or repair our products under warranty. Factors that influence our warranty liability include the number of units sold, the length of warranty term, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and the cost per claim. Asbestos-Related Liabilities and Assets ITT has been named as a defendant in numerous product liability lawsuits alleging personal injury due to asbestos exposure. We accrue the estimated value of pending claims and unasserted claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years, including legal fees, on an undiscounted basis, due to the inability to reliably forecast the timing of future cash flows. Assumptions utilized in estimating the liability for both pending and unasserted claims include: disease type, average settlement costs, percentage of claims settled or dismissed, the number of claims estimated to be filed against the Company in the future and the costs to defend such claims. 72 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES The Company has also recorded an asbestos-related asset, composed of insurance receivables. The asbestos- related asset represents our best estimate of probable recoveries from third parties for pending claims, as well as unasserted claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. In developing this estimate, the Company considers coverage-in-place and other settlement agreements with its insurers, as well as a review of expected levels of future cost recovery, the financial viability of the insurance companies, the method by which losses will be allocated to the various insurance policies and the years covered by those policies, and interpretation of the various policy and contract terms and limits and their interrelationships. Consistent with the asbestos liability, the asbestos-related asset has not been discounted to present value due to the inability to reliably forecast the timing of future cash flows. Under coverage- in-place agreements, an insurer’s policies remain in force and the insurer undertakes to provide coverage for the Company’s pending and future asbestos claims on specified terms and conditions. Insurance payments under coverage-in-place agreements are made to the Company as asbestos claims are settled or adjudicated. The Company’s buyout agreements provide an agreed upon amount of available coverage for future asbestos claims under the subject policies to be paid to a Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) on a specific schedule as agreed upon by the Company and its insurer. However, assets in the QSF are only available and distributed when qualifying asbestos expenditures are submitted for reimbursement as defined in the QSF agreement. Therefore, recovery of insurance reimbursements under these types of agreements is dependent on the timing of the payment of the liability and, consistent with the asbestos liability, have not been discounted to present value. In the third quarter each year we conduct an asbestos remeasurement with the assistance of outside consultants to review and update, as appropriate, the underlying assumptions used to estimate our asbestos liability and related assets, including a reassessment of the time horizon over which a reasonable estimate of unasserted claims can be projected. In addition, as part of our ongoing review of our net asbestos exposure, each quarter we assess the most recent data available for the key inputs and assumptions, comparing the data to the expectations on which the most recent annual liability and asset estimates were based. Provided the quarterly review does not indicate a more detailed evaluation of our asbestos exposure is required, each quarter we record a net asbestos expense to maintain a rolling 10-year time horizon. Postretirement Benefit Plans ITT sponsors pension and other employee-related defined benefit plans (collectively, postretirement benefit plans) for employees around the world. Postretirement benefit obligations are generally determined, where applicable, based on participant years of service, future compensation, and age at retirement or termination. The determination of projected benefit obligations and the recognition of expenses related to postretirement benefit plans are dependent on various assumptions that are judgmental. The assumptions involved in the measurement of our postretirement benefit plan obligations and net periodic postretirement costs primarily relate to discount rates, long-term expected rates of return on plan assets, mortality and termination rates, and other factors. Management develops each assumption using relevant Company experience in conjunction with market-related data for each individual country in which such plans exist. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and are amortized over the estimated future working life, or remaining lifetime, of the plan participants depending on the nature of the retirement plan. For the recognition of net periodic postretirement cost, the calculation of the long-term expected return on plan assets is generally derived using a market-related value of plan assets based on yearly average asset values at the measurement date over the last 5 years. The fair value of plan assets is estimated based on market prices or estimated fair value at the measurement date. The funded status of each plan is recorded on our balance sheet. Actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs or credits that have not yet been recognized through net income are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity, net of taxes, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic postretirement cost. Research & Development Research and development (R&D) activities are charged to expense as incurred and are reported as a component of operating income within the R&D expense line. Stock-Based Compensation Stock-based awards issued to employees include non-qualified stock options (NQOs), restricted stock units (RSUs), and performance units (PSUs). In 2013, the granting of PSUs replaced the cash-settled total shareholder return award in our long-term incentive plan. Stock-based awards issued to non-employee directors typically are in the form of RSUs. We account for NQOs, PSUs, and equity settled RSUs as equity-based compensation awards while cash-settled total shareholder return awards granted prior to 2013 and cash-settled RSUs are accounted for as liability- based awards. Compensation costs resulting from share-based payment transactions are recognized primarily within general and administrative expenses, at fair value over the requisite service period (typically three years) on a straight- 73 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES line basis. The amount of compensation recognized includes an adjustment based on an estimate of awards ultimately expected to vest. The fair value of NQOs is determined on the date of grant using a binomial lattice pricing model incorporating multiple and variable assumptions over time, including assumptions such as employee exercise patterns, stock price volatility and changes in dividends. See Note 16, Long-Term Incentive Employee Compensation, for additional information regarding the assumptions utilized to determine the grant date fair value. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The majority of RSUs settle in shares; however RSUs granted to non-U.S. employees are typically settled in cash. The fair value of cash-settled RSUs is remeasured using the closing price of the Company's common stock at the end of each reporting period. Recipients do not have voting rights and do not receive cash dividends during the restriction period. Dividend equivalents on RSUs, which are subject to forfeiture, are accrued and paid in cash upon vesting of the RSU, which typically occurs three years from the date of grant. If an employee retires or is terminated other than for cause, a pro rata portion of the RSU may vest. PSU awards are based on both a relative total shareholder return (TSR) metric as well as a return on invested capital (ROIC) metric, equally weighted, providing a balance between relative and absolute long-term performance. The PSU awards will settle in shares, dependent upon performance, following a three-year performance period. The PSU awards are accounted for as two distinct awards, an ROIC award and a TSR award. The fair value of TSR awards is measured at grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation, measuring potential total shareholder return for ITT relative to the other companies in the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index. The fair value of the ROIC awards is based on the closing price of ITT common stock on the date of grant less the present value of expected dividend payments during the vesting period. The fair value of cash-settled total shareholder return awards granted prior to 2013 was remeasured using a Monte Carlo simulation at the end of each reporting period, except for the final measurement which reflects the actual fair value on the December 31, 2014 vesting date. Restructuring We periodically initiate management approved restructuring activities to achieve cost savings through reduced operational redundancies and to strategically position ourselves in the market in response to prevailing economic conditions and associated customer demand. Costs associated with restructuring actions can include severance, infrastructure charges to vacate facilities or consolidate operations, contract termination costs and other related charges. For involuntary separation plans, a liability is recognized when it is probable and reasonably estimable. For voluntary separation plans, a liability is recognized when the employee irrevocably accepts the voluntary termination. For one-time termination benefits, such as additional severance pay or benefit payouts, and other exit costs, such as lease termination costs, the liability is measured and recognized initially at fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred, with subsequent changes to the liability recognized as adjustments in the period of change. Restructuring costs are presented within general and administrative expenses. Income Taxes We determine the provision for income taxes using the asset and liability approach. Under this approach, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying currently enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences will reverse. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the generation of future taxable income (including the reversals of deferred tax liabilities) during the periods in which those deferred tax assets will become deductible. We record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence regarding the realizability of its deferred tax assets, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, taxable income in carryback periods, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, estimated future taxable income, and whether we have a recent history of losses. The valuation allowance can be affected by changes to tax regulations, interpretations and rulings, changes to enacted statutory tax rates, and changes to future taxable income estimates. We have not provided deferred tax liabilities for the impact of U.S. income taxes on undistributed foreign earnings which we plan to reinvest indefinitely outside the U.S. We plan foreign earnings remittance amounts based on projected cash flow needs, as well as the working capital and long-term investment requirements of foreign subsidiaries and our domestic operations. 74 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Furthermore, we recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position in consideration of applicable tax statutes and related interpretations and precedents and the expected outcome of the proceedings (or negotiations) with the taxing authorities. Tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized on ultimate settlement. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per common share considers the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, as well as outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Diluted earnings per share considers the outstanding shares utilized in the basic earnings per share calculation as well as the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock that do not contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options, unvested restricted stock units and unvested performance stock units. The dilutive effect of such equity awards is calculated based on the average share price for each reporting period using the treasury stock method. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation of earnings per share if they have an anti-dilutive effect. Cash and Cash Equivalents ITT considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity or remaining maturity at the time of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents primarily include fixed-maturity time deposits and money market investments. We record the fixed maturity time deposits at amortized cost and accrue interest during the maturity period. Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject ITT to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable from trade customers, investments and derivatives. We maintain cash and cash equivalents with various financial institutions located in different geographical regions, and our policy is designed to limit exposure to any individual counterparty. As part of our risk management processes, we perform periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of the financial institutions. We have not sustained any material credit losses during the previous three years from financial instruments held at financial institutions. Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally diversified due to the large number of entities comprising ITT’s customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic regions. However, our largest customer represents approximately 10% of the December 31, 2014 outstanding trade accounts receivable balance. ITT performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of its third-party distributors, resellers and other customers and requires collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, in certain circumstances. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We determine our allowance for doubtful accounts using a combination of factors to reduce our trade receivables balances to their estimated net realizable amount. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a variety of factors including the length of time receivables are past due, macroeconomic trends and conditions, significant one- time events, historical experience and the financial condition of our customers. We record a specific reserve for individual accounts when we become aware of specific customer circumstances, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration in the customer’s operating results or financial position. The past due or delinquency status of a receivable is based on the contractual payment terms of the receivable. If circumstances related to the specific customer change, we adjust estimates of the recoverability of receivables as appropriate. Inventories Inventories, which include the costs of material, labor and overhead, are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost generally computed on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. Estimated losses from obsolete and slow-moving inventories are recorded to reduce inventory values to their estimated net realizable value and are charged to cost of sales. At the point of loss recognition, a new cost basis for that inventory is established and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in a recovery in carrying value. Inventories valued under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method represent 15.1% and 15.3% of total 2014 and 2013 inventories, respectively. We have a LIFO reserve of $9.3 and $9.2 recorded as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Cost of sales is generally reported using standard cost techniques with full overhead absorption that approximates actual cost. Plant, Property and Equipment Plant, property and equipment, including capitalized interest applicable to major project expenditures, are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows: buildings and improvements – five to 40 years, machinery and equipment – two to 10 years, furniture and office 75 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES equipment – three to seven years, and other – five to 40 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the life of the lease or the asset, whichever is shorter. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until disposal. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The Company enters into operating and capital leases for the use of premises and equipment. Rent expense related to operating lease agreements are recorded on a straight line basis, considering lease incentives and escalating rental payments. Capitalized Internal Use Software Costs incurred in the preliminary project stage of developing or acquiring internal use software are expensed as incurred. After the preliminary project stage is completed, management has approved the project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used for its intended purpose, ITT capitalizes certain internal and external costs incurred to acquire or create internal use software, principally related to software coding, designing system interfaces and installation and testing of the software. ITT amortizes capitalized internal use software costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally from three to seven years. Investments As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we held investments in time deposits with a cost of $5.4 and $112.9, respectively, having an original maturity exceeding three months at the time of purchase. These investments mature within four months of the balance sheet date and have been presented in other current assets as short-term investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. These investments have been classified as held-to-maturity and are recorded at amortized cost, which approximates fair value at December 31, 2014 and 2013. We did not realize any gains or losses from the maturity of our investments during 2014 or 2013. Interest income recognized from these investments during 2014 or 2013 was not material to our results of operations. Investments in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) policies are recorded at their cash surrender values as of the balance sheet date. The Company’s investments in COLI policies are included in other non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheets and were $93.0 and $93.6 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Changes in the cash surrender value during the period generally reflect gains or losses in the fair value of assets, premium payments, and policy redemptions. Gains from COLI investments of $4.6, $3.7, and $1.3 were recorded within operating expenses during years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These investments were made with the intention of utilizing them as a long-term funding source for deferred compensation obligations, which as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $14.4 and $14.9, respectively, however, the COLI policies do not represent a committed funding source for these obligations and as such they are subject to claims from creditors, and we can designate them for another purpose at any time. Long-Lived Asset Impairment Long-lived assets, including intangible assets with finite lives and capitalized internal use software, are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. We assess the recoverability of long-lived assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow the assets are expected to generate and recognize an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When an impairment is identified, we reduce the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill represents purchase consideration paid in a business combination that exceeds the values assigned to the net assets of the acquired business. Intangible assets include customer relationships, proprietary technology, trademarks, patents and other intangible assets. Intangible assets with a finite life are generally amortized on a straight- line basis over an estimated economic useful life, which generally ranges from 10-20 years, and are tested for impairment if indicators of impairment are identified. Certain of our intangible assets have an indefinite life, namely certain brands and trademarks. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but rather are tested for impairment annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, such as changes to the reporting unit structure, significant adverse changes in the business climate or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator). We conduct our annual impairment testing on the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter. When reviewing for impairment, we may opt to make an initial qualitative evaluation which considers present events and circumstances, to determine the likelihood of impairment. If the likelihood of impairment is not considered to be more likely than not, then no further testing is performed. For goodwill, if it is considered to be more likely than not that the asset is impaired, then a two-step quantitative impairment test is performed. In the first step, the estimated fair value of each reporting unit is compared to the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, 76 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES goodwill is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not performed. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed in order to measure the impairment loss to be recorded, if any. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference. For indefinite-lived intangibles, if it is considered to be more likely than not that the asset is impaired, we compare the fair value of those assets to their carrying value. We recognize an impairment loss when the estimated fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its carrying value. We estimate the fair value of our reporting units using an income approach. Under the income approach, we estimate fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. We estimate the fair value of our indefinite- lived intangible assets using the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method estimates the portion of a company’s earnings attributable to an intellectual property asset based on an assumed royalty rate that the company would have paid had the asset not been owned. Business Combinations ITT allocates the purchase price of its acquisitions to the tangible and intangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree based on their estimated fair value at the acquisition date. Changes to acquisition date fair values prior to the expiration of the measurement period, a period not to exceed 12 months from date of acquisition, are recorded as an adjustment to the associated goodwill. Changes to acquisition date fair values after expiration of the measurement period are recorded in earnings. The excess of the acquisition price over those estimated fair values is recorded as goodwill. Acquisition-related expenses are expensed as incurred and the costs associated with restructuring actions initiated after the acquisition are recognized separately from the business combination. Commitments and Contingencies We record accruals for commitments and loss contingencies for those which are both probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In addition, legal fees are accrued for cases where a loss is probable and the related fees can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine both probability and the estimated amount of loss. We review these accruals quarterly and adjust the accruals to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other current information. Environmental-Related Liabilities and Assets Accruals for environmental matters are recorded on a site-by-site basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, based on current law and existing technologies. Our estimated liability is reduced to reflect the participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective shares of the relevant costs. Accruals for environmental liabilities are primarily included in other non-current liabilities at undiscounted amounts and exclude claims for recoveries from insurance companies or other third parties. The Company records an asset related to its environmental exposures for insurance and other-related parties. The environmental-related asset represents our best estimate of probable recoveries from third parties for costs incurred in past periods, as well as costs estimated to be incurred in future periods. In developing this estimate, the Company reviews the expected levels of future cost recovery, the financial viability of the insurance companies, the sites and claims covered by those policies, and our interpretation of the various policy and contract terms and limits. Environmental costs and related recoveries are recorded within general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Foreign Currency Translation The national currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are generally the functional currencies. Balance sheet accounts are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the end of each period, except for equity which is translated at historical rates; income statement accounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translation are reflected in the cumulative translation adjustments component of shareholders’ equity. For foreign subsidiaries that do not use the local currency as their functional currency, foreign currency assets and liabilities are remeasured to the foreign subsidiary’s functional currency using end of period exchange rates, except for nonmonetary balance sheet accounts, which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. For transactions denominated in other than the functional currency, revenue and expenses are remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during the reporting period in which the transactions occurred, except for expenses related to nonmonetary assets and liabilities. Transaction gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement are reported in general and administrative expenses. 77 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Fair Value Measurements We determine fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We prioritize the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels based on the observability of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measure. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), then to quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted market prices of identical assets in less active markets (Level 2) and gives the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Derivative Financial Instruments ITT may use derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign currency forward contracts, to mitigate exposure from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations as it pertains to receipts from customers, payments to suppliers and intercompany transactions. In connection with the Bornemann acquisition, we assumed certain foreign currency contracts related to forecasted transactions with third-parties. We record derivatives at their fair value as either an asset or liability and include adjustments to reflect changes in the fair value of our derivatives in earnings as the contracts are not designated as hedges. The differentials paid or received on interest rate swap agreements are recognized as adjustments to interest expense. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the notional amount of our foreign currency derivatives was $5.4 and $13.1, respectively, and our interest rate swaps was $3.3 and $11.9, respectively. The amount of gains and losses recorded related to our foreign currency contracts and interest rate swaps, and the net fair value of our outstanding derivative contracts was not material as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Derivative contracts involve the risk of non-performance by the counterparty. The fair value of our foreign currency contracts has been determined using the net position of the contracts and the applicable spot rates and forward rates as of the reporting date. NOTE 2 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance eliminating diversity in practice surrounding the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new guidance requires entities to net an unrecognized tax benefit with a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward if the carryforward would be used to settle additional tax due upon disallowance of a tax position. The adoption of this amendment on January 1, 2014 did not have a material effect on ITT's financial statements. In March 2013, the FASB clarified that, when a reporting entity (parent) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a business within a foreign entity, the parent is required to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. The cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The FASB also clarified that if a business combination is achieved in stages related to a previously held equity method investment (step-acquisition) that is a foreign entity, the amount of accumulated other comprehensive income that is reclassified and included in the calculation of gain or loss as of the acquisition date shall include any foreign currency translation adjustment related to that previously held investment. The adoption of these amendments on January 1, 2014 did not have a material impact to ITT's financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance requiring an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date as the amount the entity agreed to pay for the arrangement between them and the other entities that are also obligated to the liability and any additional amount the entity expects to pay on behalf of the other entities. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2014 did not have a material impact to ITT's financial statements. Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted In May 2014, the FASB amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The amendments are based on the principle that revenue should be recognized to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entity’s contracts with customers. Adoption of the amendments is required in the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The amendments may be applied retrospectively to 78 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES each prior period presented or with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. ITT is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments and the transition alternatives on ITT's financial statements. In April 2014, the FASB issued guidance that raises the threshold for a disposal to qualify as a discontinued operation and requires new disclosures of both discontinued operations and other disposals that do not meet the definition of a discontinued operation. The new guidance defines a discontinued operation as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results. The new guidance will become effective on January 1, 2015, with early adoption permitted. While we do not expect a material impact on ITT’s financial statements upon adoption, the effects on future periods will depend upon the nature and significance of future disposals. NOTE 3 SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company’s segments are reported on the same basis used internally for evaluating performance and for allocating resources. Our four reportable segments are referred to as: Industrial Process, Motion Technologies, Interconnect Solutions and Control Technologies. Industrial Process manufactures engineered fluid process equipment serving a diversified mix of customers in global infrastructure industries such as chemical, oil and gas, mining, and other industrial process markets and is a provider of plant optimization and efficiency solutions and aftermarket services and parts. Motion Technologies manufactures brake components, shock absorbers and damping technologies for the global automotive, truck and trailer, public bus and rail transportation markets. Interconnect Solutions manufactures and designs a wide range of highly engineered harsh environment connector solutions that make it possible to transfer signal and power between electronic devices which service global customers for the aerospace and defense, industrial and transportation, oil and gas, and medical markets. Control Technologies manufactures specialized equipment, including actuation, valves, and noise and energy absorption components for the aerospace and defense, and industrial markets. Corporate and Other consists of corporate office expenses including compensation, benefits, occupancy, depreciation, and other administrative costs, as well as charges related to certain matters, such as asbestos and environmental liabilities, that are managed at a corporate level and are not included in segment results when evaluating performance or allocating resources. Assets of the segments exclude general corporate assets, which principally consist of cash, investments, asbestos-related receivables and certain property, plant and equipment. Revenue Operating Income (Loss) Operating Margin 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 Industrial Process $ 1,208.3 $ 1,107.4 $ 955.8 $ 123.9 $ 112.0 $ 99.3 Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies 769.4 392.8 290.5 721.8 395.5 278.2 626.2 375.7 277.1 130.9 100.3 22.2 63.5 14.2 55.3 83.1 6.9 58.3 Total segment results 2,661.0 2,502.9 2,234.8 340.5 281.8 247.6 — (6.4) (6.4) — (6.0) (6.0) — (3.9) (32.8) (50.9) (7.0) (70.2) (65.4) (45.2) (7.0) (74.1) (98.2) (96.1) $ 2,654.6 $ 2,496.9 $ 2,227.8 $ 266.4 $ 183.6 $ 151.5 10.0% 7.4% 6.8% 2014 10.3% 17.0% 5.7% 21.9% 12.8% — — — 2013 10.1% 13.9% 3.6% 19.9% 11.3% — — — 2012 10.4% 13.3% 1.8% 21.0% 11.1% — — — Asbestos-related costs, net Eliminations / Other corporate costs Total Eliminations / Corporate and Other costs Total 79 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Assets Capital Expenditures Depreciation and Amortization 2014 2013 2014 2013 2012 2014 2013 2012 $ 1,152.3 $ 1,132.7 $ 40.4 $ 63.0 $ 35.0 $ 29.1 $ 31.0 $ 17.3 450.1 365.4 334.1 466.2 364.6 344.7 1,329.6 1,432.0 49.2 20.2 3.8 5.2 31.7 15.6 5.7 6.9 27.1 11.2 6.1 4.4 30.3 12.8 10.0 6.1 29.6 10.6 10.0 5.7 27.8 10.0 9.3 6.7 $ 3,631.5 $ 3,740.2 $ 118.8 $ 122.9 $ 83.8 $ 88.3 $ 86.9 $ 71.1 Revenue(a) 2013 2014 2012 $ 927.0 $ 896.2 $ 869.3 303.3 588.3 836.0 266.7 583.4 750.6 200.5 519.3 638.7 $ 2,654.6 $ 2,496.9 $ 2,227.8 Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Corporate and Other Total Geographic Information United States Germany Other developed markets Other emerging growth markets Total (a) Revenue to external customers is attributed to individual regions based upon the destination of product or service delivery. Geographic Information United States Italy Germany South Korea China Other developed markets Other emerging growth markets Total Plant, Property & Equipment, Net 2014 $ 169.4 89.3 44.9 37.1 36.1 20.9 46.2 $ 443.9 2013 $ 151.0 78.7 51.8 40.5 31.3 22.0 50.9 $ 426.2 The following table provides revenue by product category, net of intercompany balances. Pumps and complementary products Pump support and maintenance services Friction products Shock absorber equipment Connectors equipment CT Aerospace products CT Industrial products Total 2014 $ 1,112.3 96.0 647.9 121.3 392.3 199.5 85.3 $ 2,654.6 2013 $ 1,010.8 96.6 619.6 102.0 394.9 192.6 80.4 $ 2,496.9 $ 2012 879.0 76.8 517.6 107.0 375.4 185.4 86.6 $ 2,227.8 During 2014, 2013, and 2012, a single customer accounted for 9.2%, 10.1%, and 13.4% of consolidated ITT revenue, respectively. 80 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTE 4 RESTRUCTURING ACTIONS We have initiated various restructuring activities throughout the business during the past three years, of which only the Interconnect Solutions turnaround activities is considered to be individually significant. See further discussion on this plan below. Other less significant restructuring actions during 2014 and 2013 included reduction in force initiatives, geographic sales presence realignment, and the exit of a non-core construction pump business. We also undertook various restructuring actions during 2012 primarily focused on reducing operating costs through reduction in force initiatives. The components of all restructuring costs incurred during each of the previous three years ended are presented in the table below. By component: Severance costs Asset write-offs Other restructuring costs Total restructuring costs By segment: Industrial Process Motion Technologies Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies Corporate and Other 2014 2013 2012 $ 23.2 1.5 3.4 $ 28.1 $ 4.2 2.1 20.5 — 1.3 $ 22.3 3.9 2.2 $ 28.4 $ 4.5 5.1 17.2 0.4 1.2 $ 10.9 0.2 2.9 $ 14.0 $ 0.3 2.2 7.2 0.8 3.5 The following table displays a rollforward of the restructuring accruals, presented on our Consolidated Balance Sheet within accrued liabilities, for each of the previous two years ended December 31st. Restructuring accruals - beginning balance Restructuring costs Cash payments Asset write-offs Foreign exchange translation and other Restructuring accrual - ending balance By accrual type: Severance accrual Facility carrying and other costs accrual 2014 $ 14.7 $ 28.1 (18.6) (1.5) (0.8) 2013 7.8 28.4 (17.1) (3.9) (0.5) $ 21.9 $ 14.7 $ 19.6 $ 13.0 2.3 1.7 The following is a rollforward of employee position eliminations associated with restructuring activities through 2014: Planned reductions - beginning balance Additional planned reductions Actual reductions Planned reductions - ending balance 2014 107 441 (420) 128 2013 10 275 (178) 107 Interconnect Solutions Turnaround Activities During 2013, we initiated a comprehensive restructuring action to improve the overall cost structure of our Interconnect Solutions segment. The charges incurred during 2014 under this action primarily related to the employee severance for approximately 320 planned headcount reductions, approximately 75% of which were factory workers, associated with an action to move certain production lines from one location to another existing lower cost manufacturing site. The charges incurred during 2013 under this action primarily related to employee severance for 180 planned headcount reductions, and to a lesser extent, asset write-offs. We do not expect to incur further restructuring costs 81 under this plan. The following table provides a rollforward of the restructuring accrual associated with the Interconnect Solutions turnaround activities. ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Restructuring accruals - beginning balance Restructuring costs Cash payments Asset Write-Offs Foreign exchange translation and other Restructuring accruals - ending balance NOTE 5 INCOME TAXES 2014 8.0 20.5 (9.9) (1.3) (0.2) 17.1 $ $ 2013 — 18.1 (6.1) (3.9) (0.1) 8.0 $ $ For each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 the tax data related to continuing operations is as follows: Income components: United States International Income from continuing operations before income tax Income tax expense (benefit) components: Current income tax expense (benefit): United States – federal United States – state and local International Total current income tax expense Deferred income tax expense (benefit) components: United States – federal United States – state and local International Total deferred income tax (benefit) expense Income tax expense (benefit) Effective income tax rate 2014 2013 2012 $ 44.5 217.5 262.0 $ 28.5 152.0 180.5 $ 33.0 116.1 149.1 16.2 0.7 54.6 71.5 (0.6) 5.1 (4.7) (0.2) 71.3 27.2% $ 10.6 4.2 39.6 54.4 (331.2) (36.7) 3.9 (364.0) $ (309.6) (171.5)% $ (32.6) (8.7) 46.8 5.5 40.1 9.9 (15.9) 34.1 39.6 26.6% A reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) for continuing operations from the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012: Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate Tax exempt interest U.S. tax on foreign earnings Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets Tax on undistributed foreign earnings Foreign tax rate differential State and local income tax Other adjustments Foreign Tax Holiday U.S. permanent items Audit settlements & unrecognized tax benefits Effective income tax rate 2014 35.0 % (10.3)% 9.3 % 8.6 % (8.1)% (6.2)% 1.6 % (1.3)% (1.3)% (1.0)% 0.9 % 27.2 % 2013 35.0 % (17.5)% (0.7)% (191.1)% 6.1 % (4.8)% 0.6 % (0.6)% (1.0)% (1.3)% 3.8 % (171.5)% 2012 35.0 % (19.7)% 0.5 % 27.7 % 1.3 % (3.0)% 1.4 % (3.9)% — % 0.5 % (13.2)% 26.6 % Our effective tax rate in 2014 was affected by changes in unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $1.6 and includes the completion of tax examinations and lapses in the statute of limitations. 82 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES As a result of investment opportunities and other factors, and their impact on the Company’s expected liquidity, certain earnings generated in Hong Kong, Japan, Luxembourg, and South Korea may be repatriated in the future and are therefore not considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. In 2014, the Company repatriated certain foreign earnings and subsequently reversed the deferred tax liability on the undistributed foreign earnings by $21.1. We have not provided for deferred taxes on the remaining excess of financial reporting over tax bases of investments in foreign subsidiaries in the amount of $508.4 because we plan to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside of the U.S. While the amount of U.S. federal income taxes, if such earnings are distributed in the future, cannot be determined, such taxes may be reduced by tax credits and other tax deductions. As of December 31, 2014, the amount of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities held by foreign subsidiaries was $555.2. Our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside of the U.S., and current plans do not anticipate that we will need funds generated from foreign operations to fund our domestic operations. In the event funds from foreign operations are needed to fund operations in the U.S. and if U.S. tax has not already been previously provided, we would be required to accrue and pay additional U.S. taxes to repatriate these funds. We operate under tax holidays in China and Korea, which are effective until December 31, 2014 and 2019, respectively. The tax holidays are conditional upon our meeting certain research, employment and/or investment thresholds. The impact of these holidays decreased foreign taxes by $3.5, or $0.04, per diluted share in 2014. Deferred tax assets and liabilities include the following: 2014 2013 $ 69.0 272.6 109.4 29.3 128.0 36.0 644.3 147.1 $ 497.2 $ (61.2) (58.7) (26.0) (0.4) $ (146.3) $ 350.9 $ 2014 56.2 304.1 — (9.4) $ 64.5 272.7 106.6 47.2 125.2 34.4 650.6 135.3 $ 515.3 $ (82.3) (58.8) (25.8) (0.4) $ (167.3) $ 348.0 $ 2013 59.5 303.6 — (15.1) $ 350.9 $ 348.0 Deferred Tax Assets: Accruals Asbestos Employee benefits Credit carryforwards Loss carryforwards Other Gross deferred tax assets Less: Valuation allowance Net deferred tax assets Deferred Tax Liabilities: Undistributed earnings Intangibles Accelerated depreciation Investment Total deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets Deferred taxes are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows: Current assets Non-current assets Current liabilities Other non-current liabilities Net deferred tax assets 83 The table included below provides a rollforward of our valuation allowance on net deferred income tax assets from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2014. ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES DTA valuation allowance - December 31, 2011 Change in assessment Current year operations DTA valuation allowance - December 31, 2012 Change in assessment Current year operations DTA valuation allowance - December 31, 2013 Change in assessment Current year operations DTA valuation allowance - December 31, 2014 Federal $ 327.0 — 25.8 352.8 (339.6) (13.2) — — — — $ State $ 127.5 — (5.1) 122.4 (35.0) (42.7) 44.7 — 0.3 45.0 $ Foreign 25.9 $ (6.5) 42.1 61.5 3.7 25.4 90.6 2.5 9.0 $ 102.1 Total $ 480.4 (6.5) 62.8 536.7 (370.9) (30.5) 135.3 2.5 9.3 $ 147.1 In the third quarter of 2013, the Company moved from a three-year adjusted cumulative domestic pretax loss position to a three-year adjusted cumulative domestic pretax income position. In measuring adjusted cumulative pretax income (loss), the Company adjusted pretax U.S. income (loss) for nonrecurring items and recurring permanent differences. The recurring permanent differences included excess stock option deductions which represented the amount of tax deductions in excess of book deductions, ultimately reducing book income on the tax return, and foreign earnings, the indefinite reinvestment of which was not asserted, and was not expected to be asserted in the foreseeable future, and dividends paid or expected to be paid. Each of these items was recurring in nature and representative of our book taxable income. In addition, we included adjustments for certain non-recurring costs directly attributable to the Distribution as these were not indicative of future taxable income. The three-year cumulative income position was strong positive evidence in evaluating the realizability of our deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2013. However, the Company considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, in its evaluation to reverse the valuation allowance at that time, including future earnings, industry trends, and certain contingencies, such as asbestos-related costs. Further, we considered future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences as a source of income available to recover a portion of existing deferred tax assets, future taxable income exclusive of reversing taxable temporary differences and carryforwards, and available tax-planning strategies in assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets. Based on positive evidence, including the three-year cumulative positive income and the absence of any significant negative evidence, management determined that it was more likely than not that the Company's U.S. deferred tax assets would be realized except for certain deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses and tax credits. After considering all available evidence, including a cumulative loss and the absence of any significant positive evidence, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against certain foreign net deferred tax assets in Germany and Venezuela. In addition, a portion of the deferred tax assets in Italy are no longer realizable. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses, state tax credits and certain foreign net deferred tax assets, primarily in Luxembourg, Germany, India and China which are not expected to be realized. Overall, the increase in the valuation allowance of $11.8 is primarily attributable to foreign net operating loss carryforwards in Luxembourg. We have the following tax attributes available for utilization at December 31, 2014: Attribute U.S. federal net operating losses U.S. state net operating losses U.S. federal tax credits U.S. state tax credits Foreign net operating losses Amount $ 1.9 $ 1,355.6 23.4 $ $ 5.9 297.0 $ First Year of Expiration 12/31/2023 12/31/2015 12/31/2021 12/31/2027 12/31/2015 We have approximately $182.0 of net operating loss carryforwards in Luxembourg as of December 31, 2014 that do not expire. Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2014 and 2013 includes excess income tax benefits related to stock-based compensation in 2014 and 2013 of approximately $10.4 and $8.7, respectively. 84 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Uncertain Tax Positions We recognize income tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if, based on the technical merits of the position, it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 is as follows: Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1 Additions for: Prior year tax positions Current year tax positions Assumed in Acquisition Reductions for: Prior year tax positions Settlements Expiration of Statute of Limitations Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31 2014 $ 161.2 2013 $ 208.8 2012 $ 198.7 2.4 2.8 — 1.6 8.0 — 48.4 0.8 3.8 (2.8) (1.0) (2.5) $ 160.1 (55.4) (1.0) (0.8) $ 161.2 (4.8) (33.6) (4.5) $ 208.8 As of December 31, 2014, $55.8 and $56.0 of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate for continuing operations and discontinued operations respectively, if realized. The Company operates in various tax jurisdictions and is subject to examination by tax authorities in these jurisdictions. The Company is currently under examination in several jurisdictions including Germany, Italy, Korea, the United Kingdom, the U.S. and Venezuela. The U.S. federal income tax audit for the years 2009 through 2011 has received Joint Committee on Taxation review. We anticipate that we will receive the final audit report within the next 12 months. The calculation of our tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits includes dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various tax jurisdictions. Due to the complexity of some uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the unrecognized tax benefit. Over the next twelve months, the net amount of the tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits in foreign and domestic jurisdictions could change by $86.5 due to changes in audit status, expiration of statutes of limitations and other events. The following table summarizes the earliest open tax years by major jurisdiction as of December 31, 2014: Jurisdiction China Czech Germany Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Mexico United States Earliest Open Year 2009 2013 2006 2005 2010 2006 2011 2009 2009 We classify interest relating to tax matters as a component of interest expense and tax penalties as a component of income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. During 2014 and 2013, we recognized $0.8 and $2.0 in net interest expense from continuing operations related to tax matters, respectively and tax penalties of $0.7 remain unchanged. We had $19.4 and $17.5 of interest expense accrued from continuing and discontinued operations related to tax matters as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Tax Matters Agreement On October 25, 2011, we entered into a Tax Matters Agreement with Exelis and Xylem that governs the respective rights, responsibilities and obligations of the companies after the Distribution with respect to tax liabilities and benefits, tax attributes, tax contests and other tax sharing regarding U.S. Federal, state, local and foreign income taxes, other tax matters and related tax returns. Exelis and Xylem have liability with ITT to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the consolidated U.S. Federal income taxes of the ITT consolidated group relating to the taxable periods in which Exelis and Xylem were part of that group. However, the Tax Matters Agreement specifies the portion, if any, of this tax 85 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES liability for which ITT, Exelis and Xylem will bear responsibility, and ITT, Exelis and Xylem agreed to indemnify each other against any amounts for which they are not responsible. The Tax Matters Agreement also provides special rules for allocating tax liabilities in the event that the Distribution is determined to not be tax-free. The Tax Matters Agreement provides for certain covenants that may restrict our ability to pursue strategic or other transactions that otherwise could maximize the value of our business and may discourage or delay a change of control that may be considered favorable. Though valid as between the parties, the Tax Matters Agreement is not binding on the IRS. Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, as the shared income tax liabilities are settled, ITT will make payments up to certain specified thresholds, with payments in excess of those specified thresholds shared among ITT, Exelis, and Xylem. If payments to the taxing authorities are less than certain specified thresholds, ITT will make payments up to the remaining specified thresholds to Exelis and Xylem. Settlement is expected to occur as the audit process by applicable taxing authorities is completed for the impacted years and cash payments are made. Given the nature of the shared tax liabilities, the maximum amount of potential future payments is not determinable. Any such cash payments, when they occur, will reduce the liability for uncertain tax positions as such payments represent an equivalent reduction of risk. The settlement of an examination could result in changes in amounts attributable to us through the Tax Matters Agreement entered into with Exelis and Xylem. Currently, we cannot reasonably estimate the amount of such changes. At December 31, 2014, ITT’s accrual for uncertain tax positions includes amounts related to certain shared tax liabilities; however, no receivables from Exelis or Xylem have been recorded as our estimate of their portion of the shared tax liabilities is not more than the amounts currently accrued for the uncertain tax position. If our estimate of exposures to the shared tax liabilities increases above the specified threshold, a receivable would be recorded. Our financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 include net tax-related balances less than $1.0, in the aggregate, related to Exelis and Xylem. Adjustments in the future for the impact of filing final income tax returns in certain jurisdictions where those returns include a combination of ITT, Exelis and Xylem legal entities and for certain amended income tax returns for the periods prior to the Distribution may be recorded to either shareholders’ equity or the statement of operations depending on the specific item giving rise to the adjustment. During 2012, $7.0 was recorded directly to shareholders’ equity as part of the Distribution of Exelis and Xylem. NOTE 6 EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table provides a reconciliation of the data used in the calculation of basic and diluted common shares outstanding for the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Weighted average common shares outstanding Add: Weighted average restricted stock awards outstanding(a) Basic weighted average common shares outstanding Add: Dilutive impact of stock options and restricted stock units Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 2014 91.5 — 91.5 1.3 92.8 2013 90.9 0.1 91.0 1.3 92.3 2012 92.7 0.3 93.0 1.1 94.1 (a) Restricted stock awards containing rights to non-forfeitable dividends which participate in undistributed earnings with common shareholders are considered participating securities for purposes of computing earnings per share. The following table provides the number of shares underlying stock options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 because they were anti- dilutive. Anti-dilutive stock options Average exercise price Year(s) of expiration 2014 0.2 2013 0.2 2012 2.0 $ 43.51 $ 26.83 $ 21.47 2024 2023 2014-2022 In addition, 0.1 of outstanding employee ROIC awards were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2014, as the performance period related to ROIC awards has not been achieved. 86 NOTE 7 RECEIVABLES, NET Trade accounts receivable Notes receivable Other Receivables, gross Less: allowance for doubtful accounts Receivables, net 2014 $ 476.8 6.1 30.5 513.4 13.3 $ 500.1 2013 $ 463.9 6.3 39.1 509.3 12.6 $ 496.7 The following table displays a rollforward of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012. Allowance for doubtful accounts – January 1 Charges to income Write-offs Foreign currency and other Allowance for doubtful accounts – December 31 NOTE 8 INVENTORIES, NET Finished goods Work in process Raw materials Inventoried costs related to long-term contracts Total inventory before progress payments Less – progress payments Inventories, net NOTE 9 OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT ASSETS Asbestos-related current assets Current deferred income taxes Prepaid income tax Short-term investments Other Other current assets Other employee benefit-related assets Capitalized software costs Environmental related assets Equity method investments Other Other non-current assets 87 2014 12.6 4.0 (2.6) (0.7) 13.3 $ $ 2013 12.9 1.8 (1.7) (0.4) 12.6 $ $ 2012 12.9 1.6 (1.6) — 12.9 $ $ $ 2014 70.5 59.9 148.5 61.4 340.3 (38.0) $ 302.3 $ 2013 49.9 94.8 166.7 85.4 396.8 (80.9) $ 315.9 2014 $ 102.4 $ 56.2 25.9 5.4 59.9 2013 84.5 59.5 23.6 112.9 65.1 $ 249.8 $ 345.6 $ 93.0 26.8 7.7 3.9 $ 95.5 14.6 11.7 4.7 18.4 $ 149.8 18.4 $ 144.9 NOTE 10 PLANT, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET Land and improvements Machinery and equipment Buildings and improvements Furniture, fixtures and office equipment Construction work in progress Other Plant, property and equipment, gross Less: accumulated depreciation Plant, property and equipment, net 2014 24.0 870.3 228.8 65.8 44.5 7.8 1,241.2 (797.3) 443.9 $ $ 2013 26.8 834.5 211.6 74.6 59.8 8.5 1,215.8 (789.6) 426.2 $ $ Depreciation expense of $72.9, $63.4 and $54.6 was recognized in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. NOTE 11 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET Goodwill Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by segment are as follows: Goodwill - December 31, 2012 Adjustments to purchase price allocations Foreign currency Goodwill - December 31, 2013 Goodwill acquired Foreign currency Goodwill - December 31, 2014 Industrial Process $ 345.5 $ 0.8 4.7 $ 351.0 $ 1.2 (20.3) $ 331.9 $ Motion Technologies 47.8 — 2.0 49.8 — (5.9) 43.9 $ $ $ 73.0 $ — 0.9 73.9 $ — (2.7) 71.2 $ — — Total 185.1 $ 651.4 0.8 7.6 185.1 $ 659.8 1.2 (28.9) 185.1 $ 632.1 — — Interconnect Solutions Control Technologies The purchase price allocation adjustment of $0.8 during 2013 relates to the Bornemann acquisition and is due to a fair value adjustment to certain environmental and royalty-related liabilities that existed at the acquisition date, partially offset by the receipt of $0.7 from the finalization of the Bornemann purchase price. As these amounts are not considered material, the adjustments were not retrospectively applied as if the accounting for the business combination had been completed at the acquisition date. Based on the results of our annual impairment test, we determined that no impairment of goodwill existed as of the measurement date in 2014 or 2013. In 2014, a qualitative assessment was performed for all reporting units and it was determined that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its carrying amount. However, future goodwill impairment tests could result in a charge to earnings. We will continue to evaluate goodwill on an annual basis as of the beginning of our fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment. 88 Other Intangible Assets Information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows: December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Customer relationships Proprietary technology Patents and other Finite-lived intangible total Indefinite-lived intangibles Other Intangible Assets Accumulated Amortization Net Intangibles Gross Carrying Amount $ 83.1 28.1 15.2 126.4 26.3 $ (38.3) $ (9.9) (13.1) (61.3) — $ 152.7 $ (61.3) $ Gross Carrying Amount $ 84.9 30.3 16.4 131.6 27.8 Accumulated Amortization Net Intangibles $ (31.9) $ (7.6) (13.0) (52.5) — 53.0 22.7 3.4 79.1 27.8 $ 159.4 $ (52.5) $ 106.9 44.8 18.2 2.1 65.1 26.3 91.4 Indefinite-lived intangibles primarily consist of brands and trademarks. Based on the results of its annual impairment tests, we determined that no impairment of the indefinite-lived intangibles existed as of the measurement date in 2014 or 2013. However, future impairment tests could result in a charge to earnings. We will continue to evaluate the indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis as of the beginning of our fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate there may be a potential impairment. Customer relationships, proprietary technology and patents and other intangible assets are amortized over weighted average lives of approximately 13.7 years, 12.5 years and 11.4 years, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets for 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $11.1, $17.6 and $10.2, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is as follows: Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter NOTE 12 ACCRUED LIABILITIES AND OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES Compensation and other employee-related benefits Asbestos-related liability Customer-related liabilities Environmental and other legal matters Accrued warranty costs Accrued income taxes and other tax-related liabilities Short-term loans and current maturities of long-term debt Other accrued liabilities Accrued and other current liabilities Deferred income taxes and other tax-related accruals Environmental liabilities Compensation and other employee-related benefits Other Other non-current liabilities 89 Estimated Amortization Expense 10.1 $ 9.8 8.8 7.2 7.0 22.2 2014 $ 176.5 106.6 41.3 31.6 29.4 28.0 1.5 50.9 $ 465.8 $ 112.2 80.2 38.6 38.5 2013 $ 178.5 85.1 55.6 38.5 28.6 29.8 39.8 44.0 $ 499.9 $ 116.2 85.1 43.8 32.7 $ 269.5 $ 277.8 NOTE 13 LEASES AND RENTALS ITT leases certain offices, manufacturing buildings, land, machinery, automobiles, computers and other equipment. The majority of leases expire at various dates through 2027 and may include renewal and payment escalation clauses. ITT often pays maintenance, insurance and tax expense related to leased assets. Rental expenses under operating leases were $18.7, $14.7 and $14.3 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Future minimum operating lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one year as of December 31, 2014 are shown below. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 and thereafter Total minimum lease payments NOTE 14 DEBT Commercial Paper Current maturities of long-term debt Current capital leases Short-term loans and current maturities of long-term debt Non-current maturities of long-term debt Non-current capital leases Long-term debt and capital leases Total debt and capital leases $ 20.4 17.5 14.2 13.4 11.4 70.5 $ 147.4 2013 38.0 1.3 0.5 39.8 7.6 1.5 9.1 48.9 $ $ 2014 — 1.1 0.4 1.5 6.0 1.0 7.0 8.5 $ $ The fair value of long-term debt as of December 31, 2014 approximates the carrying value and carries an interest rate ranging from 4.20% to 5.25%. Principal plus interest payments will be within the range of $1 to $2 per year over the next five years. At December 31, 2014, assets of $1.1 were pledged as collateral. At December 31, 2014, we had two interest rate swaps outstanding, with an aggregate notional amount of $3.3 and fair value of $0.5. The interest rate swaps convert floating-rate debt to a fixed rate. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are recorded in earnings as the interest rate swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting. Revolving Credit Facility On November 25, 2014, we entered into a competitive advance and revolving credit facility agreement (2014 Revolving Credit Agreement) with a consortium of third party lenders including JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and Citibank, N.A. as syndication agent. Upon its effectiveness, this agreement replaced our existing $500 four-year revolving credit facility due October 2015. The 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement provides for a five-year maturity with a one-year extension option upon satisfaction of certain conditions, and comprises an aggregate principal amount of up to $500 of (i) revolving extensions of credit (the revolving loans) outstanding at any time, (ii) competitive advance borrowing option which will be provided on an uncommitted competitive advance basis through an auction mechanism (the competitive advances), and (iii) letters of credit in a face amount up to $100 at any time outstanding. Subject to certain conditions, we are permitted to terminate permanently the total commitments and reduce commitments in minimum amounts of $10. We are also permitted, subject to certain conditions, to request that lenders increase the commitments under the facility by up to $200 for a maximum aggregate principal amount of $700. Borrowings under the credit facility are available in U.S. dollars, Euro or Sterling. At our election, the interest rate per annum applicable to the competitive advances will be obtained from bids in accordance with competitive auction procedures. At our election, interest rate per annum applicable to the revolving loans will be based on either (i) a Eurodollar rate determined by reference to LIBOR, adjusted for statutory reserve requirements, plus an applicable margin or (ii) a fluctuating rate of interest determined by reference to the greatest of 90 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (a) the prime rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (b) the federal funds effective rate plus one-half of 1% or (c) the 1- month LIBOR rate, adjusted for statutory reserve requirements, plus 1%, in each case, plus an applicable margin. We had no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2014. The credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants that, among other things, will limit or restrict our ability to: incur additional debt or issue guarantees; create liens; enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions; merge or consolidate with another person; sell, transfer, lease or otherwise dispose of assets; liquidate or dissolve; and enter into restrictive covenants. Additionally, the 2014 Revolving Credit Agreement requires us not to permit the ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) (leverage ratio) to exceed 3.00 to 1.00 at any time, or the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense (interest coverage ratio) to be less than 3.00 to 1.00. At December 31, 2014, our interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio were within the prescribed thresholds. In the event of certain ratings downgrades, the direct and indirect significant U.S. subsidiaries of the Company would be required to guarantee the obligations under the credit facility. NOTE 15 POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS Defined Contribution Plans Substantially all of ITT’s U.S. and certain international employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan. ITT sponsors numerous defined contribution savings plans, which allow employees to contribute a portion of their pre-tax and/or after-tax income in accordance with specified guidelines. Several of the plans require us to match a percentage of the employee contributions up to certain limits. Company contributions charged to income amounted to $17.3, $15.3, and $13.5 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At the Distribution Date, the ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees was created, which increased Company contributions from a maximum of 3.5% of base pay to 6% or 7%, depending on age and years of service, of total eligible pay which includes base pay, overtime and qualified bonuses. This plan was renamed the ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan in 2014. Additionally, for five years subsequent to the Distribution Date, the Company will provide transition credits to certain employees up to 5% of eligible pay. During 2013, future defined contribution plan changes were approved increasing Company contributions for most U.S. hourly employees to a maximum of 6.0% or 7.0% of total eligible pay. The ITT Stock Fund, an investment option under the ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan, is considered an employee stock ownership plan and, as a result, participants in the ITT Stock Fund may receive dividends in cash or may reinvest such dividends into the ITT Stock Fund. The ITT Stock Fund held approximately 0.2 shares of ITT common stock at December 31, 2014. Defined Benefit Plans ITT sponsors several defined benefit pension plans which have approximately 2,400 active participants; however, most of these plans have been closed to new participants for several years. As of December 31, 2014, of our total projected benefit obligation, the ITT Industrial Process Pension Plan represented 37%, the ITT Consolidated Hourly Pension Plan represented 38%, other U.S. plans represented 4% and international pension plans represented 21%. The U.S. plans are generally for hourly employees with a flat dollar benefit formula based on years of service. International plan benefits are primarily determined based on participant years of service, future compensation, and age at retirement or termination. ITT also provides health care and life insurance benefits for eligible U.S. employees upon retirement. In some cases, the plan is still open to certain union employees, but for the majority of our businesses these plans are closed to new participants. The majority of the liability pertains to retirees with postretirement medical insurance. During 2014, management approved changes to certain other employee-related defined benefit plans, reducing certain retiree medical benefits, resulting in a decrease to ITT's other employee-related defined benefit liability of $58.7. During 2013, management approved changes to certain of our defined benefit pension and postretirement plans, including the merging of plans and the elimination of future benefit accruals for plan participants as of December 31, 2013. These changes resulted in a decrease to ITT's net postretirement liability of $23.3 and a curtailment loss of $1.2. 91 Balance Sheet Information Amounts recognized as assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for postretirement benefit plans reflect the funded status. The following table provides a summary of the funded status of our postretirement benefit plans and the presentation of the funded status within our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Fair value of plan assets Projected benefit obligation Funded status Amounts reported within: Non-current assets Accrued liabilities Non-current liabilities 2014 Other Benefits 9.5 $ 134.5 $ (125.0) $ — (8.6) (116.4) Pension $ 273.9 411.6 $ (137.7) $ — (4.4) (133.3) Total $ 283.4 546.1 $ (262.7) $ — (13.0) (249.7) Pension $ 268.8 366.0 $ (97.2) $ 1.9 (4.8) (94.3) 2013 $ Other Benefits 9.2 166.6 $ (157.4) $ — (8.4) (149.0) Total $ 278.0 532.6 $ (254.6) $ 1.9 (13.2) (243.3) A portion of our projected benefit obligation includes amounts that have not yet been recognized as expense in our results of operations. Such amounts are recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss until they are amortized as a component of net periodic postretirement cost. The following table provides a summary of amounts recorded within accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2014 and 2013. Net actuarial loss Prior service cost (benefit) Total 2014 Other Benefits 63.0 $ Total $ 232.1 (74.2) (67.6) Pension $ 126.9 2.8 $ (11.2) $ 164.5 $ 129.7 2013 Other Benefits 39.4 (22.2) 17.2 $ $ Total $ 166.3 (19.4) $ 146.9 Pension $ 169.1 6.6 $ 175.7 The following table provides a rollforward of the projected benefit obligations for our U.S. and international pension plans and our other employee-related defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. 2014 2013 U.S. Int’l Other Benefits Total U.S. Int’l Other Benefits Total Change in benefit obligation Benefit obligation – January 1 $281.2 $ 84.8 $ 166.6 $ 532.6 $303.6 $ 83.4 $ 213.0 $ 600.0 Service cost Interest cost Amendments Actuarial (gain) loss Benefits and expenses paid Settlement Foreign currency translation 3.2 13.1 4.5 39.0 (16.9) — — 1.6 2.4 — 13.7 (3.0) (1.6) (10.4) 1.5 7.4 6.3 22.9 (58.7) (54.2) 25.9 78.6 (8.2) (28.1) — — (1.6) (10.4) 4.9 12.1 0.1 (22.9) (16.6) — — 1.7 2.5 — (1.8) (3.2) — 2.2 2.9 8.3 (19.0) (30.4) (8.2) — — 9.5 22.9 (18.9) (55.1) (28.0) — 2.2 Benefit obligation – December 31 $324.1 $ 87.5 $ 134.5 $ 546.1 $281.2 $ 84.8 $ 166.6 $ 532.6 92 The following table provides a rollforward of our U.S. and international pension plan and other employee-related defined benefit plan assets and the funded status as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Change in plan assets Plan assets – January 1 Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Benefits and expenses paid Settlement 2014 2013 U.S. Int’l Other Benefits Total U.S. Int’l Other Benefits Total $ 266.8 $ 22.1 0.9 (16.9) — 2.0 0.1 3.5 (3.0) (1.6) $ 9.2 0.3 8.2 $ 278.0 $ 247.1 $ 22.5 12.6 35.4 0.9 (8.2) (28.1) (16.6) — (1.6) — $ 2.0 0.1 2.8 (2.9) — 7.9 1.3 8.2 $ 257.0 36.8 11.9 (8.2) (27.7) — — Plan assets – December 31 $ 272.9 $ 1.0 $ 9.5 $ 283.4 $ 266.8 $ 2.0 $ 9.2 $ 278.0 Funded status at end of year $ (51.2) $ (86.5) $ (125.0) $ (262.7) $ (14.4) $ (82.8) $ (157.4) $ (254.6) The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $408.3 and $363.0 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The following table provides information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets. Projected benefit obligation Accumulated benefit obligation Fair value of plan assets Income Statement Information 2014 $ 411.6 408.3 273.9 2013 $ 237.7 234.6 138.6 The following table provides the components of net periodic postretirement cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 as they pertain to our defined benefit pension plans. 2014 2013 2012 U.S. Int’l Total U.S. Int’l Total U.S. Int’l Total Net periodic postretirement cost Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain) Amortization of prior service cost Net periodic postretirement cost Effect of curtailment / Special termination benefit Total net periodic postretirement cost $ 3.2 $ 13.1 (20.0) 1.6 2.4 $ 4.8 $ 4.9 $ 15.5 12.1 1.7 2.5 $ 6.6 $ 4.8 $ 14.6 12.9 (0.1) (20.1) (19.5) (0.1) (19.6) (18.2) 5.8 0.6 2.7 — 2.7 0.4 — 4.3 0.4 4.7 6.2 0.6 7.0 0.4 7.4 8.3 0.8 6.6 1.2 7.8 0.6 — 4.7 — 4.7 8.9 0.8 11.3 1.2 12.5 6.5 0.9 6.9 — 6.9 1.0 2.5 (0.1) (0.2) — 3.2 — 3.2 Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss Net actuarial (gain) loss Prior service cost Amortization of net actuarial (loss) gain Amortization of prior service cost Foreign currency translation Total change recognized in other comprehensive loss Total impact from net periodic postretirement cost and changes in other comprehensive loss 93 37.0 4.5 (5.8) (0.6) — 13.7 — (0.9) — (1.8) 50.7 4.5 (6.7) (0.6) (1.8) (40.0) (1.8) (41.8) 19.8 14.8 — (8.3) (0.8) — — (0.6) — 0.5 — (8.9) (0.8) 0.5 — (6.5) (0.9) — — 0.2 — 0.4 35.1 11.0 46.1 (49.1) (1.9) (51.0) 12.4 15.4 27.8 $ 37.8 $ 15.7 $ 53.5 $ (41.3) $ 2.8 $ (38.5) $ 19.3 $ 18.6 $ 37.9 $ 5.8 15.4 (18.3) 6.3 0.9 10.1 — 10.1 34.6 — (6.3) (0.9) 0.4 The following table provides the components of net periodic postretirement cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive loss for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 as they pertain to other employee-related defined benefit plans. ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Net periodic postretirement cost Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of net actuarial loss Amortization of prior service credit Total net periodic postretirement cost Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss Net actuarial (gain) loss Prior service credit Amortization of net actuarial loss Amortization of prior service credit Total changes recognized in other comprehensive loss 2014 2013 2012 $ 1.5 7.4 (0.7) 2.7 (6.6) 4.3 26.3 (58.7) (2.7) 6.6 (28.5) $ 2.9 8.3 (0.6) 4.3 (0.4) 14.5 (31.1) (19.0) (4.3) 0.4 (54.0) $ 2.5 9.5 (0.5) 4.6 (0.1) 16.0 22.1 (3.1) (4.6) 0.1 14.5 Total impact from net periodic postretirement cost and changes in other comprehensive loss $ (24.2) $ (39.5) $ 30.5 The following table provides the estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost that is expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic postretirement cost during 2015. Net actuarial loss Prior service cost (credit) Total Postretirement Plan Assumptions Pension $ $ 8.7 1.0 9.7 Other Benefits $ $ 4.4 (11.0) (6.6) Total 13.1 (10.0) 3.1 $ $ The determination of projected benefit obligations and the recognition of expenses related to postretirement benefit plans are dependent on various assumptions that are judgmental and developed in consultation with external advisors. Management develops each assumption using relevant Company experience in conjunction with market-related data for each individual country in which such plans exist. Assumptions are reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary. The actuarial assumptions are based on the provisions of the applicable accounting pronouncements, review of various market data and discussion with our external advisors. Changes in these assumptions could materially affect our financial statements. The following table provides the weighted-average assumptions used to determine projected benefit obligations and net periodic postretirement cost, as they pertain to our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans and other employee-related defined benefit plans. Obligation Assumptions: Discount rate Rate of future compensation increase Cost Assumptions: Discount rate Expected return on plan assets 2014 2013 U.S. Int’l Other Benefits U.S. Int’l Other Benefits 4.0% N/A 4.8% 8.0% 1.9% 3.3% 3.2% 4.7% 3.8% N/A 4.7% 8.0% 4.8% N/A 4.1% 8.0% 3.2% 3.4% 3.1% 4.7% 4.7% N/A 4.1% 8.0% The assumed discount rates reflect our expectation of the present value of expected future cash payments for benefits at the measurement date. We base the discount rate assumption on investment yields of high-quality fixed income securities at the measurement date during the expected benefits payment period. The discount rates were 94 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES determined by considering an interest rate yield curve comprised of high quality corporate bonds, with maturities generally between zero and thirty years. Annual benefit payments are then discounted to present value using this yield curve to develop a single-point discount rate matching the plan’s payment characteristics. The rate of future compensation increase assumption for foreign plans reflects our long-term actual experience and future and near-term outlook. The rate of future compensation increase assumption is not applicable for U.S. plans because the benefit formula is based on a years of service approach. The expected long-term rate of return on assets reflects the expected returns for each major asset class in which the plans invest, the weight of each asset class in the target mix, the correlations among asset classes, and their expected volatilities. Our expected return on plan assets is estimated by evaluating both historical returns and estimates of future returns based on our target asset allocation. Specifically, we estimate future returns based on independent estimates of asset class returns weighted by the target investment allocation. The chart below shows actual returns compared to the expected long-term returns for our postretirement plans that were utilized in the calculation of the net periodic postretirement cost for each respective year. Expected rate of return on plan assets Actual rate of return on plan assets 2014 8.0% 8.6% 2013 8.0% 14.2% 2012 8.0% 11.1% For the recognition of net periodic postretirement cost, the calculation of the expected return on plan assets is generally derived using a market-related value of plan assets based on average asset values at the measurement date over the last five years. The use of fair value, rather than a market-related value, of plan assets could materially affect net periodic postretirement cost. During 2014, the Company adopted a revised mortality table, to reflect improved mortality, which increased the Company’s projected benefit obligation by approximately $19 for its US pension and other employee related benefit plans. The assumed rate of future increases in the per capita cost of health care (the health care trend rate) is 8.0% for pre-age 65 retirees and 6.3% for post-age 65 retirees for 2015, decreasing ratably to 4.5% in 2021. Increasing the health care trend rates by one percent per year would have the effect of increasing the benefit obligation by $5.5 and the aggregate annual service and interest cost components by $0.5. A decrease of one percent in the health care trend rate would reduce the benefit obligation by $4.7 and the aggregate annual service and interest cost components by $0.4. To the extent that actual experience differs from these assumptions, the effect will be amortized over the average future working life or life expectancy of the plan participants. Investment Policy The investment strategy for managing worldwide postretirement benefit plan assets is to seek an optimal rate of return relative to an appropriate level of risk for each plan. Investment strategies vary by plan, depending on the specific characteristics of the plan, such as plan size and design, funded status, liability profile and legal requirements. Substantially all of the postretirement benefit plan assets are managed on a commingled basis in a master investment trust. With respect to the master investment trust, the Company allows itself broad discretion to invest tactically to respond to changing market conditions, while staying reasonably within the target asset allocation ranges prescribed by its investment guidelines. In making these asset allocation decisions, the Company takes into account recent and expected returns and volatility of returns for each asset class, the expected correlation of returns among the different investments, as well as anticipated funding and cash flows. To enhance returns and mitigate risk, the Company diversifies its investments by strategy, asset class, geography and sector. The following table provides the allocation of plan assets held in the master investment trust by asset category, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related targeted asset allocation ranges by asset category. U.S. equities International equities Fixed income Cash and other 95 2014 36% 29% 35% —% 2013 Target Allocation Range 37% 30% 32% 1% 30-40 % 20-40 % 25-45 % 0-5 % ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES The strategies and allocations of plan assets outside of the U.S. are managed locally and may differ significantly from those in the U.S. In general and as of December 31, 2014, non-U.S. plan assets of approximately $1.0 are managed closely to their strategic allocations. Fair Value of Plan Assets In measuring plan assets at fair value, a fair value hierarchy is applied which categorizes and prioritizes the inputs used to estimate fair value into three levels. The fair value hierarchy is based on maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are defined as follows: • • • Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices (in non-active markets or in active markets for similar assets or liabilities), inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. In certain instances, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices obtained from external pricing services. In obtaining such data from the pricing service, the Company has evaluated the methodologies used to develop the estimate of fair value in order to assess whether such valuations are representative of fair value, including net asset value (NAV). Additionally, in certain circumstances, the Company may adjust NAV reported by an asset manager when sufficient evidence indicates NAV is not representative of fair value. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used to measure fair value for major categories of investments. • Equities – Open ended mutual funds, collective trusts and commingled funds are measured at NAV. These funds are classified within either Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. • Fixed income – U.S. government securities are generally valued using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. Corporate bonds and notes are generally valued by using pricing models (e.g., discounted cash flows), quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or broker quotes. Fixed income securities are classified in Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The following table provides the fair value of plan assets held by our postretirement benefit plans, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, by asset class. 2014 Equities: U.S. International Emerging Markets Fixed income Cash and other Total 2013 Equities: U.S. International Emerging Markets Fixed income(a) Cash and other Total Pension Other Benefits Total Level 2 Total Level 1 $ $ $ $ 97.6 53.0 24.9 97.1 1.3 273.9 $ $ 97.6 53.0 24.9 97.1 1.3 273.9 Pension Total Level 2 98.2 56.6 25.5 85.0 3.5 268.8 $ $ 98.2 56.6 25.5 85.0 3.5 268.8 $ $ $ $ 2.8 1.9 0.9 2.8 1.1 9.5 $ $ 2.8 1.9 0.9 2.8 1.1 9.5 Other Benefits Total Level 3 — — — 9.2 — 9.2 $ $ — — — 9.2 — 9.2 (a) Other employee benefit plan assets as of December 31, 2013 included an investment in a structured security valued using broker quotes and classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy due to the significance of unobservable inputs involved in the broker quote. This Level 3 investment was liquidated during 2014 and the proceeds were invested in Level 1 securities. 96 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Contributions While we make contributions to our postretirement benefit plans when considered necessary or advantageous to do so, the minimum funding requirements established by local government funding or taxing authorities, or established by other agreements, may influence future contributions. Funding requirements under IRS rules are a major consideration in making contributions to our post-retirement plans. In addition, we fund certain of our international pension plans in countries where funding is allowable and tax-efficient. During 2014 and 2013, we contributed $4.4 and $3.7 to our global pension plans, respectively. We anticipate making contributions to our global pension plans of $5.0 during 2015. We contributed $8.2 to our other employee-related defined benefit plans during both 2014 and 2013. We currently estimate that the 2015 contributions to our other employee-related defined benefit plans will be approximately $11.0. Estimated Future Benefit Payments The following table provides the projected timing of payments for benefits earned to date and the expectation that certain future service will be earned by current active employees for our pension and other employee-related benefit plans. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 – 2024 $ U.S. Pension 17.0 17.6 18.0 18.4 18.9 98.5 $ Int’l Pension 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.6 19.1 $ Other Benefits 10.6 10.3 10.2 10.0 9.8 43.1 NOTE 16 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION The 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2011 Incentive Plan) was approved by shareholders and established in May of 2011 to provide for the awarding of options on common shares and full value restricted common shares or units to employees and non-employee directors. The number of shares initially available for issuance to participants under the 2011 Incentive Plan was 4.6. The 2011 Incentive Plan replaced the ITT Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (2003 Incentive Plan) on a prospective basis and no future grants will be made under the 2003 Incentive Plan. However, any shares remaining available for issuance under the 2003 Incentive Plan became available for grant under the 2011 Incentive Plan as of the date the 2011 Incentive Plan was approved by shareholders. In connection with the Distribution, and per the terms of the 2011 Incentive Plan, an equitable adjustment which preserved the intrinsic value of the awards after giving effect to the distribution of Exelis and Xylem was made (referred to as the Equitable Adjustment). As of December 31, 2014, 39.9 shares were available for future grants under the 2011 Incentive Plan. ITT makes shares available for the exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted shares or units by purchasing shares in the open market or by issuing shares from treasury stock. Prior to 2013, our long-term incentive plan (LTIP) was comprised of three components: non-qualified stock options (NQOs), restricted stock units (RSUs), and a Total Shareholder Return (TSR) award. The majority of RSUs settle in shares; however RSUs granted to international employees are settled in cash. We account for NQOs and equity settled RSUs as equity-based compensation awards while cash-settled TSR awards granted prior to 2013 and cash settled RSUs are accounted for as liability-based awards. Beginning in 2013, we replaced the TSR component of our LTIP with a Performance Unit award component. Performance Unit (PSU) awards are based on both a relative total shareholder return metric as well as an ROIC metric, equally weighted, providing a balance between relative and absolute long-term performance. The PSU awards will settle in shares, dependent upon performance, following a three-year performance period to further align payouts with stock price performance. The PSU awards are accounted for as two distinct awards, an ROIC award and a TSR award. We account for NQOs, RSUs, ROIC awards, and share- settled TSR awards granted after 2012 as equity-based compensation awards. 97 Long-term incentive employee compensation costs are primarily recorded within general and administrative expenses, and are reduced by an estimated forfeiture rate. These costs impacted our consolidated results of operations as follows: ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Share-based compensation expense, equity-based awards Share-based compensation expense, liability-based awards Total share-based compensation expense in operating income 2014 $ 14.0 3.1 $ 17.1 2013 $ 13.3 3.8 $ 17.1 2012 $ 12.9 1.9 $ 14.8 At December 31, 2014, there was $18.5 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested equity awards. This cost is expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years. Additionally, unrecognized compensation cost related to liability-based awards was $2.3, which is expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. Non-Qualified Stock Options Options generally vest over or at the conclusion of a three-year period and are exercisable in seven or ten-year periods, except in certain instances of death, retirement or disability. Options granted between 2004 and 2009 were awarded with a contractual term of seven years. Options granted prior to 2004 and after 2009 were awarded with a contractual term of ten years. The exercise price per share is the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date each option is granted. A summary of the status of our NQOs as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and changes during the years then ended is presented below. Stock Options Outstanding – January 1 Granted Exercised Cancelled or expired Outstanding – December 31 Options exercisable – December 31 2014 2013 2012 Weighted Average Exercise Price 20.46 43.52 $ 17.67 24.46 24.20 20.26 $ $ Weighted Average Exercise Price 18.46 26.82 $ 17.37 16.15 20.46 18.34 $ $ Shares 4.3 0.4 (1.9) (0.1) 2.7 1.5 Shares 2.7 0.2 (0.8) (0.2) 1.9 1.1 Shares 8.0 0.4 (3.8) (0.3) 4.3 2.9 Weighted Average Exercise Price 16.70 22.80 $ 15.35 17.21 18.46 17.10 $ $ The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price of the options on the date of exercise) during 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $22.5, $26.3 and $24.7, respectively. The amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options was $15.1, $34.8 and $58.0 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The income tax benefit realized during 2014, 2013 and 2012 associated with stock option exercises and lapses of restricted stock was $15.1, $13.4 and $11.0, respectively. We classify the cash flows attributable to excess tax benefits arising from stock option exercises and restricted stock lapses as a financing activity. Excess tax benefits arising from stock option exercises and restricted stock lapses were $10.4, $8.7 and $6.4 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 98 The following table summarizes information about ITT’s stock options at December 31, 2014: Options Outstanding Options Exercisable ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exercise Prices $12.39 $19.82 $19.97 $20.28 $21.53 $22.80 $26.76 $43.52 Number 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 1.9 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value 2.3 1.0 3.3 9.5 4.9 5.9 4.1 — 31.0 1.2 $ 0.2 5.2 6.9 6.2 7.2 8.2 9.2 6.7 $ Number 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 — — 1.1 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value 2.3 1.0 3.3 9.5 4.9 1.0 — — 22.0 1.2 $ 0.2 5.2 6.9 6.2 7.2 — — 5.8 $ The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, based on ITT’s closing stock price of $40.46 as of December 31, 2014, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. There was 0.2 options “out-of-the-money” as of December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the total number of stock options expected to vest (including those that have already vested) was 1.8. These stock options have a weighted-average exercise price of $23.94, an aggregate intrinsic value of $30.7 and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 6.7 years. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the binomial lattice pricing model which incorporates multiple and variable assumptions over time, including assumptions such as employee exercise patterns, stock price volatility and changes in dividends. The following are weighted-average assumptions for 2014, 2013 and 2012: Dividend yield Expected volatility Expected life (in years) Risk-free rates Weighted-average grant date fair value 2014 1.0% 29.6% 5.8 1.8% 2013 1.5% 29.9% 6.4 1.1% $ 11.93 $ 6.62 $ 2012 1.6% 34.1% 6.9 1.4% 6.71 Expected volatilities for option grants prior to the Distribution were based on ITT’s stock price history, including implied volatilities from traded options on our stock. Expected volatilities for option grants subsequent to the Distribution were based on a peer average of historical and implied volatility. ITT uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination behavior within the valuation model. Option characteristics are considered separately for valuation purposes. We utilized two employee groups for option grant valuation purposes for periods prior to the distribution and have utilized one group for all subsequent option grant valuations. The expected life represents an estimate of the period of time options are expected to remain outstanding. The expected life provided above represents the weighted average of expected behavior for certain groups of employees who have historically exhibited different behavior. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of option grant. Restricted Stock Units and Performance Units The fair value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units is determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on date of grant. Recipients do not have voting rights and do not receive cash dividends during the restriction period. Dividend equivalents on RSUs, which are subject to forfeiture, are accrued and paid in cash upon vesting of the RSU, which typically occurs three years from the date of grant. If an employee retires or is terminated other than for cause, a pro rata portion of the RSU may vest. The fair value of the ROIC awards was based on the closing price of ITT common stock on the date of grant less the present value of expected dividend payments during the vesting period. A dividend yield of 1.00% was assumed based on ITT's annualized dividend payment of $0.44 per share and the March 4, 2014 closing stock price of $43.52. The fair value of the ROIC award is fixed on the grant date; however, a probability assessment is performed each 99 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES reporting period to estimate the likelihood of achieving the ROIC targets and the amount of compensation to be recognized. The ROIC award payout is subject to a payout factor which includes a maximum and minimum payout. The fair value of the TSR award was measured using a Monte Carlo simulation on the date of grant, measuring potential total shareholder return for ITT relative to the other companies in the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index (the TSR Performance Group). The expected volatility of ITT's stock price was based on the historical volatility of a peer group while expected volatility for the other companies in the TSR Performance Group was based on their own stock price history. All volatility and correlation measures were based on three years of daily historical price data through March 4, 2014, corresponding to the three-year performance period of the award. The TSR award payout is subject to a multiplier which includes a maximum and minimum payout. As the grant date occurs after the beginning of the performance period, actual TSR performance between the beginning of the performance period (December average closing stock price) and the grant date was reflected in the valuation. A dividend yield of 1.00% was assumed based on ITT's annualized dividend payment of $0.44 per share and the March 4, 2014 closing stock price of $43.52 The table below provides a rollforward of outstanding RSUs, PSUs, and RSAs for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. 2014 2013 2012 Restricted Stock and Performance Units Outstanding – January 1 Granted Lapsed Canceled Outstanding – December 31 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 24.17 43.88 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 21.06 28.16 Shares 1.2 $ 0.6 21.62 27.33 31.70 (0.4) (0.1) 1.3 $ 20.25 22.68 24.17 Shares 1.3 $ 0.4 (0.5) (0.1) 1.1 $ Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 18.55 22.56 15.21 20.58 21.06 $ $ Shares 1.4 0.4 (0.5) (0.1) 1.2 The table below provides the number of the outstanding equity settled RSUs, ROIC awards, TSR awards, and cash settled RSUs as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Equity settled RSUs (a) Cash settled RSUs TSR Awards ROIC Awards 2014 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 2013 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 2012 1.1 0.1 — — (a) Included in the 2012 equity settled RSU's are 0.2 of Restricted Stock Awards that vested and were issued during March of 2013. As of December 31, 2014, the total number of RSUs and PSUs expected to vest was 0.7 and 0.3, respectively. The number of PSUs expected to vest is based on current performance estimates. Total Shareholder Return Awards Prior to 2013, our LTIP included a performance-based, cash-settled TSR incentive program. TSR awards granted under this program were accounted for as liability-based awards. The fair value of outstanding awards on December 31, 2014 of $5.4 was determined at the conclusion of the three-year performance period by measuring ITT’s total shareholder return percentage against the total shareholder return performance of other stocks generally comprising the S&P 400 Capital Goods Index and is expected to be paid in the first quarter of 2015. In addition, throughout the vesting period, we remeasured the fair value of the TSR awards at the end of each reporting period using the actual total shareholder return data through the measurement date and utilized a Monte Carlo simulation to project the potential future returns for any remaining period. No payments were made during either 2014, 2013, or 2012 under the TSR award program. 100 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTE 17 CAPITAL STOCK ITT has authority to issue an aggregate of 300 shares of capital stock, of which 250 shares have been designated as Common Stock having a par value of $1 per share and 50 shares have been designated as Preferred Stock not having any par or stated value. There was no Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. The stockholders of ITT common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by ITT’s Board of Directors. Dividends are paid quarterly. Dividends declared were $0.44, $0.40 and $0.364 per common share in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. On October 27, 2006, a three-year $1 billion share repurchase program (2006 Share Repurchase Program) was approved by our Board of Directors. On December 16, 2008, the provisions of the share repurchase program were modified by our Board of Directors to replace the original three-year term with an indefinite term. During 2014 and 2013, we repurchased 1.1 and 3.1 shares of common stock for $50.0 and $85.2, respectively. Through December 2014, we had repurchased 16.4 shares for $679.3, including commissions, under the $1 billion share repurchase program. Separate from the 2006 Share Repurchase Program, the Company repurchased 0.2 shares, 0.1 shares, and 0.1 shares for an aggregate price of $10.2, $2.7, and $3.4, during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, in settlement of employee tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock or stock units. We make shares available for the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock by purchasing shares in the open market or by issuing shares from treasury stock. During 2014, 2013, and 2012, we issued 1.4 shares, 2.3 shares, and 4.0 shares, respectively, related to equity compensation arrangements. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, 13.3 shares and 13.0 shares of Common Stock were held in our treasury account, respectively. NOTE 18 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of our businesses. Some of these proceedings allege damages relating to environmental exposures, intellectual property matters, copyright infringement, personal injury claims, employment and employee benefit matters, government contract issues and commercial or contractual disputes, sometimes related to acquisitions or divestitures. We will continue to defend vigorously against all claims. Although the ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based on present information including our assessment of the merits of the particular claim, as well as our current reserves and insurance coverage, we do not expect that such legal proceedings will have any material adverse impact on our financial statements, unless otherwise noted below. Asbestos Matters ITT, including its subsidiary Goulds Pumps, Inc., has been sued, along with many other companies in product liability lawsuits alleging personal injury due to asbestos exposure. These claims generally allege that certain products sold by us or our subsidiaries prior to 1985 contained a part manufactured by a third party (e.g., a gasket) which contained asbestos. To the extent these third-party parts may have contained asbestos, it was encapsulated in the gasket (or other) material and was non-friable. As of December 31, 2014, there were 49 thousand pending active claims against ITT, including Goulds Pumps, filed in various state and federal courts alleging injury as a result of exposure to asbestos. Activity related to these asserted asbestos claims during the period was as follows: (in thousands) Pending claims – Beginning New claims Settlements Dismissals(a) Pending claims – Ending Pending inactive claims(a) Pending active claims 2014 79 4 (2) (19) 62 13 49 2013 96 5 (3) (19) 79 13 66 2012 105 4 (1) (12) 96 29 67 (a) Dismissals reported in the table above include the dismissal of approximately 16 thousand claims in 2013 and 12 thousand in 2012, which were considered pending inactive claims. There were no inactive claims dismissed during 2014. Inactive claims represent pending claims in Mississippi filed in 2004 or prior, which have been excluded from our asbestos measurement because the plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a significant compensable loss. As such, management believes these claims have little to no value. 101 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Frequently, plaintiffs are unable to identify any ITT or Goulds Pumps product as a source of asbestos exposure. Our experience to date is that a majority of resolved claims are dismissed without any payment from the Company. Management believes that a large majority of the pending claims have little or no value. In addition, because claims are sometimes dismissed in large groups, the average cost per resolved claim, as well as the number of open claims, can fluctuate significantly from period to period. ITT expects more asbestos-related suits will be filed in the future, and ITT will aggressively defend or seek a reasonable resolution, as appropriate. Estimating the Liability and Related Asset The Company records an asbestos liability, including legal fees, for costs estimated to be incurred to resolve all pending claims, as well as unasserted claims estimated to be filed against the Company over the next ten years. The asbestos liability has not been discounted to present value due to an inability to reliably forecast the timing of future cash flows. The methodology used to estimate our asbestos liability for pending claims and claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years relies on and includes the following: • interpretation of a widely accepted forecast of the population likely to have been exposed to asbestos in the workplace; • widely accepted epidemiological studies estimating the number of people likely to develop mesothelioma and lung cancer from exposure to asbestos; the Company’s historical experience with the filing of non-malignant claims against it and the historical relationship between non-malignant and malignant claims filed against the Company; analysis of the number of likely asbestos personal injury claims to be filed against the Company based on such epidemiological and historical data and the Company’s recent claims experience; analysis of the Company’s pending cases, by disease type; analysis of the Company’s recent experience to determine the average settlement value of claims, by disease type; analysis of the Company's recent experience in the ratio of settled claims to total resolved claims, by disease type; analysis of the Company’s defense costs in relation to its indemnity costs; adjustment for inflation in the average settlement value of claims and defense costs estimated to be paid in the future; and analysis of the Company’s recent experience with regard to the length of time to resolve asbestos claims. • • • • • • • • Asbestos litigation is a unique form of litigation. Frequently, the plaintiff sues a large number of defendants and does not state a specific claim amount. After filing of the complaint, the plaintiff engages defendants in settlement negotiations to establish a settlement value based on certain criteria, including the number of defendants in the case. Rarely do the plaintiffs seek to collect all damages from one defendant. Rather, they seek to spread the liability, and thus the payments, among many defendants. As a result, the Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential exposure to pending claims and claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. The forecast period used to estimate our potential liability to pending and projected asbestos claims is a judgment based on a number of factors, including the number and type of claims filed, recent experience with pending claims activity and whether that experience is expected to continue into the future, the jurisdictions where claims are filed, the effect of any legislative or judicial developments, and the likelihood of any comprehensive asbestos legislation at the federal level. These factors have both positive and negative effects on the dynamics of asbestos litigation in the tort system and, accordingly, our estimate of the asbestos exposure. Developments related to asbestos tend to be long-cycle, changing over multi-year periods. Accordingly, we monitor these and other factors and periodically assess whether an alternative forecast period is appropriate. The Company retains a consulting firm to assist management in estimating the potential liability for pending asbestos claims and for claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years based on the methodology described above. Our methodology determines a point estimate based on our assessment of the value of each underlying assumption, rather than a range of reasonably possible outcomes. Projecting future asbestos costs is subject to numerous variables and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to predict. In addition to the uncertainties surrounding the key assumptions discussed above, additional uncertainty related to asbestos claims and estimated costs arises from the long latency period prior to the manifestation of an asbestos-related disease, changes in available medical treatments and changes in medical costs, changes in plaintiff behavior resulting from bankruptcies of other companies that are or could be co- defendants, uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, and the impact of potential legislative or judicial changes. At December 31, 2014, approximately 30% of the recorded 102 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES asbestos liability relates to pending claims, with the remainder relating to claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years. We record a corresponding undiscounted asbestos-related asset that represents our best estimate of probable recoveries from our insurers for the estimated asbestos liabilities. In developing this estimate, the Company considers coverage-in-place and other agreements with its insurers, as well as a number of additional factors. These additional factors reviewed include the financial viability of our insurance carriers and any related solvency issues, the method by which losses will be allocated to the various insurance policies and the years covered by those policies, the extent to which settlement and defense costs will be reimbursed by the insurance policies and interpretation of the various policy and contract terms and limits and their interrelationships, and various judicial determinations relevant to our insurance programs. The timing and amount of reimbursements will vary due to a time lag between when ITT pays an amount to defend or settle a claim and when a reimbursement is received from an insurer, differing policy terms and certain gaps in our insurance coverage as a result of uninsured periods, insurer insolvencies, and prior insurance settlements. Approximately 84% of our estimated receivables are due from insurers that had credit ratings of A- or better from A.M. Best as of December 31, 2014. In addition, the Company retains an insurance consulting firm to assist management in estimating probable recoveries for pending asbestos claims and for claims estimated to be filed over the next 10 years based on the analysis of policy terms, the likelihood of recovery provided by external legal counsel, and incorporating risk mitigation judgments where policy terms or other factors are not certain. The aggregate amount of insurance available to the Company for asbestos-related claims was acquired over many years and from many different carriers. Amounts deemed not recoverable generally are due from insurers that are insolvent, or result from disagreements with the insurers over policy terms, coverage limits or coverage disputes. Such limitations in our insurance coverage are expected to result in projected payments to claimants substantially exceeding the probable insurance recovery. The Company has negotiated with certain of its insurers to reimburse the Company for a portion of its indemnity and defense costs through “coverage-in-place” agreements or policy buyout agreements. The agreements are designed to facilitate the collection of ITT’s insurance portfolio, to mitigate issues that insurers may raise regarding their responsibility to respond to claims, and to promote an orderly exhaustion of the policies. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 55% of our asbestos-related assets were related to coverage-in-place agreements and buyout agreements with insurers. After reviewing our portfolio of insurance policies, with consideration given to applicable deductibles, retentions and policy limits, the solvency and historical payment experience of various insurance carriers, existing insurance settlements, and the advice of outside counsel with respect to the applicable insurance coverage law relating to the terms and conditions of its insurance policies, ITT believes that its recorded receivable for insurance recoveries is probable of collection. Estimating our exposure to pending asbestos claims and those that may be filed in the future is subject to significant uncertainty and risk as there are multiple variables that can affect the timing, severity, quality, quantity and resolution of claims. Any predictions with respect to the variables impacting the estimate of the asbestos liability and related asset are subject to even greater uncertainty as the projection period lengthens. In light of the uncertainties and variables inherent in the long-term projection of the Company’s asbestos exposures, although it is probable that the Company will incur additional costs for asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years which could be material to the financial statements, we do not believe there is a reasonable basis for estimating those costs at this time. The asbestos liability and related receivables reflect management’s best estimate of future events. However, future events affecting the key factors and other variables for either the asbestos liability or the related receivables could cause actual costs or recoveries to be materially higher or lower than currently estimated. Due to these uncertainties, as well as our inability to reasonably estimate any additional asbestos liability for claims which may be filed beyond the next 10 years, it is not possible to predict the ultimate cost of resolving all pending and unasserted asbestos claims. We believe it is possible that future events affecting the key factors and other variables within the next 10 years, as well as the cost of asbestos claims filed beyond the next 10 years, net of expected recoveries, could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. 103 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Settlement Agreements During 2014, ITT executed a final settlement agreement (the 2014 Settlement) with an insurer to settle responsibility for multiple insurance claims, resulting in a one-time lump sum payment to the Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) of $2.2 in 2015. During 2013, ITT executed a final settlement agreement (the 2013 Settlement) with an insurer to settle responsibility for multiple categories of insured claims, including pending and future product liability claims. Under the terms of the 2013 Settlement, the insurer agreed to a specified series of payments over the course of the next five years, resulting in a one-time benefit of $31.0. In 2012, we executed an agreement (the 2012 Settlement) with the entity (the counterparty) that acquired a business disposed by ITT in 1986. The 2012 Settlement accelerated the cost sharing provisions of a previous agreement with the counterparty. Under the terms of the 2012 Settlement, the counterparty assumed full responsibility for all pending and future asbestos-related claims filed against the disposed business, whether they were served on ITT or the counterparty. ITT also agreed that certain insurance rights will remain with the pending and future claims filed against the disposed business, benefiting the counterparty. Income from continuing operations reflects a benefit of $5.8 from the 2012 Settlement, while income from discontinued operations reflects a benefit of $5.6 from the 2012 Settlement. Income Statement Charges The table below summarizes the total net asbestos charge for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012. Continuing operations: Asbestos provision Asbestos remeasurement, net Settlement Agreement Net asbestos charge - continuing operations Discontinued Operations: Asbestos provision Settlement Agreement Net asbestos charge - discontinued operations Total net asbestos charge Changes in Financial Position 2014 2013 2012 $ $ 64.9 (58.8) (2.2) 3.9 — — — 3.9 $ $ 63.3 0.5 (31.0) 32.8 — — — 32.8 $ $ 53.8 2.9 (5.8) 50.9 0.5 (5.6) (5.1) 45.8 The following table provides a rollforward of the estimated asbestos liability and related assets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Balance as of January 1 Changes in estimate Settlement Agreement Net cash activity and other Balance as of December 31 Current portion Noncurrent portion Liability $ 1,264.7 32.4 — (73.9) $ 1,223.2 106.6 1,116.6 $ $ 2014 Asset 517.8 26.3 2.2 (69.9) 476.4 102.4 374.0 Net 746.9 $ Liability $ 1,347.4 6.1 (2.2) (4.0) 11.4 — (94.1) 2013 Asset Net $ 607.9 $ 739.5 (52.4) 31.0 (68.7) 63.8 (31.0) (25.4) $ 746.8 $ 1,264.7 $ 517.8 $ 746.9 85.1 1,179.6 84.5 433.3 104 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Environmental In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to federal, state, local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations. We are responsible, or are alleged to be responsible, for ongoing environmental investigation and site remediation. These sites are in various stages of investigation and/or remediation and in many of these proceedings our liability is considered de minimis. We have received notification from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and from similar state and foreign environmental agencies, that a number of sites formerly or currently owned and/or operated by ITT, and other properties or water supplies that may be or have been impacted from those operations, contain disposed or recycled materials or wastes and require environmental investigation and/or remediation. These sites include instances where we have been identified as a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental laws and regulations. The following table provides a rollforward of the estimated environmental liability and related assets for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Liability 94.6 $ 2014 Asset 11.7 $ Net 82.9 $ Liability $ 96.1 2013 Asset $ 12.3 Net $ 83.8 Balance as of January 1 Changes in estimates for pre- existing accruals: Pre-existing accrual additions(a) Pre-existing accrual reversals Accruals added during the period for new matters Net cash activity Foreign currency Balance as of December 31 $ 11.2 (2.9) 0.1 (12.6) (0.5) 89.9 (3.7) — — (0.3) — 7.7 $ 14.9 (2.9) 0.1 (12.3) (0.5) 14.4 (4.4) 0.5 (12.1) 0.1 (0.1) — — (0.5) — 14.5 (4.4) 0.5 (11.6) 0.1 $ 82.2 $ 94.6 $ 11.7 $ 82.9 (a) Changes in estimates for pre-existing accruals includes environmental-related costs of $2.7 and $1.5 reported within results of discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The following table illustrates the reasonably possible high range of estimated liability, and number of active sites for environmental matters. High end range Number of active environmental investigation and remediation sites 2014 $ 160.3 54 2013 $ 168.0 60 As actual costs incurred at identified sites in future periods may vary from our current estimates given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures, management believes it is possible that the outcome of these uncertainties may have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. NOTE 19 GUARANTEES, INDEMNITIES AND WARRANTIES Indemnities As part of the Distribution, ITT provided certain indemnifications and cross-indemnifications among ITT, Exelis and Xylem, subject to limited exceptions with respect to certain employee claims and other liabilities and obligations. The indemnifications address a variety of subjects, including asserted and unasserted product liability matters (e.g., asbestos claims, product warranties) which relate to products manufactured, repaired and/or sold prior to the Distribution Date. The indemnifications are indefinite. ITT expects Exelis and Xylem to fully perform under the terms of the Distribution Agreement and therefore has not recorded a liability for matters for which we have been indemnified. In addition, both Exelis and Xylem have made asbestos indemnity claims that could give rise to material payments under the indemnity provided by ITT; such claims are included in our estimate of asbestos liabilities. Since ITT’s incorporation in 1920, we have acquired and disposed of numerous entities. The related acquisition and disposition agreements contain various representation and warranty clauses and may provide indemnities for a misrepresentation or breach of the representations and warranties by either party. The indemnities address a variety of subjects; the term and monetary amounts of each such indemnity are defined in the specific agreements and may be affected by various conditions and external factors. Many of the indemnities have expired either by operation of 105 ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES law or as a result of the terms of the agreement. We do not have a liability recorded for these indemnifications and are not aware of any claims or other information that would give rise to material payments under such indemnities. Guarantees We have $182.4 of guarantees, letters of credit and similar arrangements outstanding at December 31, 2014, primarily pertaining to commercial or performance guarantees and insurance matters. We have not recorded any material loss contingencies under these guarantees, letters of credit and similar arrangements as of December 31, 2014 as the likelihood of nonperformance by ITT is considered remote. From time to time, we may provide certain third-party guarantees that may be affected by various conditions and external factors, some of which could require that payments be made under such guarantees. We do not consider the maximum exposure or current recorded liabilities under our third-party guarantees to be material either individually or in the aggregate. We do not believe such payments would have a material adverse impact on our financial statements on a consolidated basis. Warranties ITT warrants numerous products, the terms of which vary widely. In general, ITT warrants its products against defect and specific non-performance. In certain markets, such as automotive, aerospace and rail, liability for product defects could extend beyond the selling price of the product and could be significant if the defect interrupts production or results in a recall. The table included below provides changes in the product warranty accrual for December 31, 2014 and 2013. Warranty accrual – January 1 Warranty expense Payments Foreign currency and other Warranty accrual – December 31 NOTE 20 DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 2014 $ 28.6 14.7 (12.2) (1.7) $ 29.4 2013 $ 28.6 8.6 (8.1) (0.5) $ 28.6 Results from discontinued operations reflect a loss of $3.9 for the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily related to a settlement payment to a former ITT entity. Results from discontinued operations reflect income of $0.8 for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily related to a reversal of warranty reserves and legal-related contingencies associated with previously disposed businesses, partially offset by a net loss of $1.3 related settlement of legacy receivables and payables with a former ITT entity. During 2012, the Company completed the sale of its shape cutting product lines, including the Kaliburn and Burny brands as well as the web tension control products and custom engineered systems sold under the Cleveland Motion Controls brand (collectively referred to herein as the Shape Cutting Businesses). The sale was completed on November 13, 2012, resulting in net proceeds from the sale of $38.4 which is included in investing activities on our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Subsequent to this divestiture, we do not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of these businesses, nor do we expect significant continuing cash flows. Accordingly, the results of operations of the Shape Cutting Businesses are reported as a discontinued operation for 2012. Summarized operating results from the Shape Cutting Businesses presented within earnings from discontinued operations are provided in the tables below. Interest expense was not allocated to the divested businesses for any of the periods presented. Amounts presented in the “Other” column within the tables below relate to various divested ITT businesses accounted for as discontinued operations in the year of divestiture for which legacy liabilities remain, as well as certain transformation costs which were directly related to the Distribution and provided no future benefit to the Company. Year Ended 2012 Revenue Earnings from discontinued operations before income taxes Gain on sale before tax Income tax benefit Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax $ Shape Cutting Businesses 30.2 $ 0.6 9.0 — 9.6 Other $ — 0.4 — (5.9) $ 6.3 Total $ 30.2 1.0 9.0 (5.9) $ 15.9 106 NOTE 21 ACQUISITIONS On November 28, 2012, we acquired all issued and outstanding stock of the privately held Joh. Heinr. Bornemann GmbH (Bornemann) for a final purchase price of $192.5, net of cash acquired. Bornemann, a supplier and servicer of multiphase pumping systems serving the global oil and gas, industrial, food and pharmaceutical markets, has more than 550 employees globally and is reported within the Industrial Process segment. The acquisition was funded with cash on hand. The final allocation of the purchase price, presented below, is based on the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests in Bornemann as of November 28, 2012. Cash Receivables Inventory Deferred tax assets Plant, property and equipment Goodwill Other intangibles Other assets Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Deferred revenue Deferred tax liabilities Short and long-term debt and capital leases Postretirement obligations Other liabilities Net assets acquired $ 11.9 29.9 44.7 14.6 29.8 147.3 58.7 9.2 (9.6) (30.1) (10.2) (23.1) (44.4) (15.0) (9.3) $ 204.4 The goodwill arising from the acquisition is primarily related to the planned geographic expansion of Bornemann operations and is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. All of the goodwill has been assigned to the Industrial Process segment. Other intangibles acquired include customer relationships, proprietary technology and trademarks. Our financial statements include the results of operations and cash flows from the Bornemann acquisition prospectively from the acquisition date. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the acquisition was not deemed material at the acquisition date. 107 SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL DATA SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) ITT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Revenue Gross profit Income from continuing operations attributable to ITT Corporation(a) Income (loss) from discontinued operations Net income attributable to ITT Corporation(a) Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to ITT Corporation: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to ITT Corporation: Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net income Common stock price per share: 2014 Quarters 2013 Quarters Fourth Third Second First Fourth Third Second First $ 660.0 $ 657.1 $ 663.0 $ 674.5 $ 645.5 $ 634.0 $ 609.2 $ 608.2 216.9 219.9 214.8 214.8 208.6 202.9 197.8 190.5 33.4 80.6 41.2 33.2 10.9 433.0 24.7 19.1 0.3 (0.3) (2.9) (1.0) 0.3 (2.3) 1.1 1.7 33.7 80.3 38.3 32.2 11.2 430.7 25.8 20.8 $ $ $ $ 0.37 — 0.37 0.36 — 0.36 $ $ $ $ 0.88 — 0.88 0.87 (0.01) 0.86 $ $ $ $ 0.45 (0.03) 0.42 0.44 (0.03) 0.41 $ $ $ $ 0.36 (0.01) 0.35 0.36 (0.01) 0.35 $ $ $ $ 0.12 — 0.12 0.12 — 0.12 $ $ $ $ 4.79 (0.03) 4.76 4.71 (0.02) 4.69 $ $ $ $ 0.27 0.02 0.29 0.27 0.01 0.28 $ $ $ $ 0.21 0.02 0.23 0.21 0.02 0.23 High Low Close $ 45.34 $ 49.42 $ 48.24 $ 44.87 $ 43.66 $ 36.51 $ 30.93 $ 29.38 $ 36.74 $ 44.93 $ 41.48 $ 37.87 $ 35.06 $ 29.11 $ 25.94 $ 23.83 $ 40.46 $ 44.94 $ 48.10 $ 42.76 $ 43.42 $ 35.95 $ 29.41 $ 28.43 Dividends per share $ 0.11 $ 0.11 $ 0.11 $ 0.11 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 (a) During the third quarter of 2013, the Company released the valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets and recorded a tax benefit of $374.6. 108 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES ITT Corporation (Registrant) By: /S/ STEVEN C. GIULIANO Steven C. Giuliano Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal accounting officer) February 20, 2015 II-1 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /S/ DENISE L. RAMOS Denise L. Ramos (Principal executive officer) /S/ THOMAS M. SCALERA Thomas M. Scalera (Principal financial officer) /S/ STEVEN C. GIULIANO Steven C. Giuliano (Principal accounting officer) /S/ ORLANDO D. ASHFORD Orlando D. Ashford Chief Executive Officer, President and Director Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer February 20, 2015 February 20, 2015 February 20, 2015 Director February 20, 2015 /S/ G. PETER D’ALOIA Director February 20, 2015 G. Peter D’Aloia /S/ DONALD DEFOSSET, JR. Director February 20, 2015 Donald DeFosset, Jr. /S/ CHRISTINA A. GOLD Director February 20, 2015 Christina A. Gold /S/ RICHARD P. LAVIN Director February 20, 2015 Richard P. Lavin /S/ FRANK T. MACINNIS Director February 20, 2015 Frank T. MacInnis /S/ REBECCA A. MCDONALD Director February 20, 2015 Rebecca A. McDonald II-2 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit Number Description Location 3.1 ITT Corporation’s Articles of Amendment and Restated Articles of Incorporation, effective as of October 31, 2011 Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (File No. 001-05672). 3.2 Amended and Restated By-laws of ITT Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 8-K Current Report dated October 5, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 Distribution Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2011, among ITT Corporation, Xylem Inc. and Exelis Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Benefits and Compensation Matters Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2011, among ITT Corporation, Xylem Inc. and Exelis Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). First Amendment to Benefits and Compensation Matters Agreement Incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2011, among ITT Corporation, Xylem Inc. and Exelis Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Master Transition Services Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2011, among ITT Corporation, Xylem Inc. and Exelis Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). ITT Transitional Trademark License Agreement - Exelis, dated as of October 25, 2011, between ITT Manufacturing Enterprises LLC and Exelis Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Master Lease Agreement and Master Sublease Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2011 and September 30, 2011, respectively Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Five Year Competitive Advance and Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2014 among ITT Corporation and Other Parties Signatory Thereto Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 8-K dated November 25, 2014 (File No. 001-05672). 10.9* ITT Corporation Retirement Savings Plan for Salaried Employees (effective October 31, 2011) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of ITT Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed on October 28, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). 10.10* 10.11* 10.12* ITT Corporation Senior Executive Change in Control Severance Pay Plan amended and restated as of January 1, 2015 (formerly known as the ITT Corporation Special Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan) ITT Corporation Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2015 (formerly known as the ITT Industries, Inc. Senior Executive Severance Pay Plan, dated December 20, 1995, amended and restated as of December 31, 2008 and July 1, 2013) ITT Corporation Change in Control Severance Plan amended and restated as of January 1, 2015 (formerly known as ITT Corporation Enhanced Severance Pay Plan (amended and restated as of July 13, 2004). Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. 10.13* ITT Deferred Compensation Plan (Effective as of January 1, 1995 as amended and restated as of October 31, 2011) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of ITT Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed on October 28, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). II-3 Exhibit Number Description 10.14* ITT Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors 10.15* ITT Excess Savings Plan amended and restated effective December 31, 2008 Location Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 001-05672). 10.16* Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary Filed herewith. 10.17* 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of ITT Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 as filed on October 28, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). 10.18* 10.19* 10.20* ITT Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Executive Officers, amended and restated as of January 1, 2013 Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (File No. 001-05672). ITT 1997 Annual Incentive Plan (amended and restated as of July 13, 2004) formerly known as ITT Industries 1997 Annual Incentive Plan (amended and restated as of July 13, 2004) ITT 2003 Equity Incentive Plan, amended and restated as of February 15, 2008 and approved by shareholders on May 13, 2008 (previously amended and restated as of July 13, 2004 and subsequently amended as of December 18, 2006) and previously known as ITT Industries, Inc. 2003 Equity Incentive Plan Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of ITT Industries’ Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (File No. 001-05672). 10.21* ITT Corporation Form of 2014 Performance Unit Award Agreement 10.22* ITT Corporation Form of 2014 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement 10.23* ITT Corporation Form of 2014 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement 10.24* ITT Corporation Form of 2013 Performance Unit Award Agreement 10.25* ITT Corporation Form of 2013 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (Band A) 10.26* ITT Corporation Form of 2013 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement 10.27* ITT Corporation Form of 2013 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Cash Settled) 10.28* ITT Corporation Form of 2012 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Band A Employees) 10.29* ITT Corporation Form of 2012 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Non-Band A Employees) 10.30* ITT Corporation Form of 2012 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement 10.31* ITT Corporation Form of 2012 TSR Award Agreement Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.04 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (File No. 001-05672). II-4 Exhibit Number Description 10.32* ITT Corporation Form of 2011 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Band A Employees) 10.33* ITT Corporation Form of 2011 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Non-Band A Employees) Location Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011(File No. 001-05672). 10.34* ITT Corporation Form of 2009 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Band A) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.56 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (File No. 001-05672). 10.35* ITT Corporation Form of 2009 Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Non Band A) 10.36* Employment Agreement dated as of October 4, 2011 and effective as of October 31, 2011 between ITT Corporation and Denise L. Ramos. 10.37* Steve Loranger Resignation Agreement 10.38 Form of indemnification agreement with directors and officers Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 of ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 8-K/A dated October 17, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of ITT Corporation’s Form 8-K dated October 14, 2011 (File No. 001-05672). Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ITT Corporation’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (File No. 001-05672). Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. Filed herewith. This Exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b) (32) (ii) and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference. This Exhibit is intended to be furnished in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(b) (32) (ii) and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference. Submitted electronically with this report. 21 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 101 The following materials from ITT Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements * Management compensatory plan ** The registrant has requested confidential treatment with respect to portions of this exhibit. Those portions have been omitted from the exhibit and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. II-5 EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF DENISE L. RAMOS PURSUANT TO SEC. 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Denise L. Ramos, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 of ITT Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 20, 2015 /S/ DENISE L. RAMOS Denise L. Ramos Chief Executive Officer and President EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF THOMAS M. SCALERA PURSUANT TO SEC. 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas M. Scalera, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 of ITT Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 20, 2015 /S/ THOMAS M. SCALERA Thomas M. Scalera Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 EXHIBIT 32.1 In connection with the Annual Report of ITT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Denise L. Ramos, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/ DENISE L. RAMOS Denise L. Ramos Chief Executive Officer and President February 20, 2015 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 EXHIBIT 32.2 In connection with the Annual Report of ITT Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Scalera, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/ THOMAS M. SCALERA Thomas M. Scalera Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 20, 2015 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. ITT Global Footprint ITT is a focused multi-industrial company that designs and manufactures highly engineered critical components and customized technology solutions. Our customers in the energy, transportation and industrial markets depend on us to solve their most critical problems, and we focus on partnering with them to find solutions to their unique challenges. Founded in 1920, ITT is headquartered in White Plains, N.Y., with employees in more than 35 countries. The company has sales in well over 100 countries and generated 2014 revenues of $2.7 billion. ITT WORLD HEADQUARTERS White Plains, New York ITT has a concentrated global footprint representing manufacturing, office and sales, and global service facilities, including the identified locations by segment. CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES Highly engineered motion control and vibration isolation products and solutions for the industrial, aerospace and defense markets (cid:116)(cid:1) Billerica, Massachusetts (cid:116)(cid:1) Orchard Park, New York (cid:116)(cid:1) Valencia, California (cid:116)(cid:1) Westminster, South Carolina (cid:116)(cid:1) Wuxi, China INTERCONNECT SOLUTIONS Connectors and interconnects for the oil and gas, medical, industrial and transportation, and aerospace and defense markets (cid:116)(cid:1) Lainate, Italy (cid:116)(cid:1) Nogales, Mexico (cid:116)(cid:1) Santa Ana, California (cid:116)(cid:1) Santa Rosa, California (cid:116)(cid:1) Shenzhen, China (cid:116)(cid:1) Weinstadt, Germany INDUSTRIAL PROCESS Pumps, valves, monitoring and control systems, water treatment and aftermarket services for the oil and gas, chemical, mining, pulp and paper, power and biopharmaceutical markets (cid:116)(cid:1) Amory, Mississippi (cid:116)(cid:1) Choongbuk, South Korea (cid:116)(cid:1) City of Industry, California (cid:116)(cid:1) Dammam, Saudi Arabia (cid:116)(cid:1) Lancaster, Pennsylvania (cid:116)(cid:1) Obernkirchen, Germany (cid:116)(cid:1) Salto, Brazil (cid:116)(cid:1) Seneca Falls, New York (cid:116)(cid:1) Shanghai, China (cid:116)(cid:1) Southaven, Mississippi (cid:116)(cid:1) Tizayuca, Mexico (cid:116)(cid:1) Vadodora, India (cid:116)(cid:1) Wangara, Australia Global Service Capabilities MOTION TECHNOLOGIES Shock absorbers, brake pads and friction materials for the automotive and rail markets (cid:116)(cid:1) Barge, Italy (cid:116)(cid:1) Hebron, Kentucky (cid:116)(cid:1) Kelsterbach, Germany (cid:116)(cid:1) Novi, Michigan (cid:116)(cid:1) Ostrava, Czech Republic (cid:116)(cid:1) Oud-Beijerland, Netherlands (cid:116)(cid:1) Termoli, Italy (cid:116)(cid:1) Vauda Canavese, Italy (cid:116)(cid:1) Wuxi, China CEO AND PRESIDENT Denise Ramos WORLDWIDE EMPLOYEES 9,400 FOUNDED 1920 NYSE SYMBOL: ITT 1133 Westchester Avenue White Plains, New York 10604 914.641.2000 www.itt.com ©2015 ITT Corporation 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above