More annual reports from Janus Henderson Group:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Janus Henderson Group:
Oaktree Capital ManagementJ
a
n
u
s
H
e
n
d
e
r
s
o
n
G
r
o
u
p
p
l
c
A
n
n
u
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
9
9
1
0
2
T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
Janus Henderson Group is a leading global
active asset manager. We exist to help clients
achieve their long-term financial goals by
providing access to a broad range of
investment solutions, including equities, fixed
income, quantitative equities, multi-asset
and alternative asset class strategies.
S
U
T
U
O
B
A
Business highlights
2019 was a year of continued transformation and strategic
positioning for the business. Strong global markets and
investment performance drove a 14% year-over-year
increase in assets under management, despite challenging
net outflows of US$27 billion. We start 2020 with strong
underlying business fundamentals: excellent investment
performance, growing momentum in many areas of
our global business, continued financial strength and
significant progress towards our strategic objectives.
1
Contents
Business review
2 Group at a glance
4 Chairman’s statement
6 Chief Executive Officer’s statement
8 Q&A with our Global Chief
Investment Officer
Investments by capability
10
12 Q&A with our Global Head of
Distribution
14 Corporate Social Responsibility
Governance
16 Board of Directors
18 Governance overview
21 Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Form 10-K
22 Form 10-K
Other information
171 Shareholder information
Investment outperformance1 (%)
Assets under management (US$bn)
76%
374.8bn
2019
2018
2017
76
2019
61
66
2018
2017
328.5
374.8
370.8
This report and additional
information about the Group
can be found online at
janushenderson.com/ir
Adjusted operating margin2 (%)
Net new money growth3 (%)
35.8%
(8)%
2019
2018
2017
35.8
(8)
39.0
39.6
(5)
(3)
Adjusted diluted earnings per share2
(US$)
Dividend per share4 (US$)
1.44
2.47
2019
2018
2017
2.47
2019
2.74
2018
2.48
2017
1.20
2019
2018
2017
1.44
1.40
Notes
Data for 2017 presents the results of Janus Henderson
Group as if the merger had occurred at the beginning
of the period shown.
In accordance with the Australian Securities and
Investment Commission Corporations Instrument
2016/191, amounts in this Annual Report have
been rounded to the nearest US$0.1 million, unless
otherwise stated.
1. Investment performance data represents
percentage of AUM outperforming the relevant
benchmark. Full performance disclosures detailed
on the inside back cover.
2. See adjusted financial measures reconciliation
on Form 10-K pages 43 and 44 for additional
information.
3. Calculated as total flows divided by beginning of
period AUM.
4. 2017 includes a hypothetical per share dividend
for Janus Henderson Group plc for 1Q17. The
amount is derived by taking the sum of the cash
dividends each legacy firm paid to its respective
shareholders (for legacy Janus that was
US$20.3 million and for legacy Henderson
that was US$26.9 million), divided by the
number of shares outstanding as at 30 May 2017
(approximately 200.4 million). USD/GBP 1.3017.
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 2
Group at a glance
Janus Henderson is an independent global asset manager, specialising
in active management. We offer a broad range of investment solutions
across major asset classes to a client base around the world.
e s u c c eed as a tea
m
W
Our Purpose
We exist to help
our clients achieve
their long-term
financial goals
W
e
a
c
t
l
i
k
e
a
n
o
w
n
er
ts first
n
e
i
l
c
r
u
o
t
u
p
e
W
We aim to:
Be a partner our clients can trust, working to deliver excellence
in both investment returns and service.
Partner with each other on our responsibilities to our clients, and create
an environment where all our colleagues can thrive and successfully
achieve their personal and professional goals.
Be a responsible steward for our owners, pursuing efficiency and
delivering stable and consistent financial returns.
Assets under management (AUM)
Capability
Equities
Diverse business encompassing a wide range
of geographic and investment styles.
Fixed Income
Coverage across the asset class, applying a wide
range of differentiated techniques.
Quantitative
Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Our quantitative equity manager, Intech®, applies
advanced mathematics and systematic portfolio
rebalancing intended to harness the volatility of
stock price movements.
US teams manage US and global asset allocation
strategies; UK teams include asset allocation
specialists, traditional multi-manager investors
and those focused on alternative asset classes.
A cross-asset class combination of alpha
generation, risk management and efficient
beta replication strategies.
Total assets under management
AUM (US$bn)
204.0
2018: 167.6
74.8
2018: 72.4
45.2
2018: 44.3
39.8
2018: 30.2
11.0
2018: 14.0
374.8
2018: 328.5
Percentage of AUM
outperforming benchmark
3 years
1 year
5 years
67%
76%
80%
82%
84%
92%
37%
40%
16%
91%
91%
93%
94%
99%
100%
69%
76%
77%
Note: Investment performance data represents percentage of AUM outperforming the relevant benchmark. Full performance disclosures detailed on the inside back cover.
Investments by capability
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
We offer expertise across major asset classes, with investment teams
situated around the world.
For more information go to page 10.
Note: All data as at 31 December 2019, unless stated otherwise.
We believe that a comprehensive CSR strategy is critical for our
sustainable success, accomplished by focusing on five key pillars:
our clients, responsible investing, our people, our community and
our environment.
For more information go to page 14.
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019
3
Assets under management
AUM by client type (%)
AUM by capability (%)
AUM by client location (%)
Our clients are financial professionals as well
as private and institutional investors.
We manage assets diversified across five
core investment capabilities.
We manage assets for a globally diverse
client base.
Intermediary
US$172.7bn
Institutional
US$132.1bn
Self-directed
US$70.0bn
46
19
35
3
11
12
20
54
14
30
56
North America
US$208.8bn
EMEA &
Latin America
US$111.6bn
Asia Pacific
US$54.4bn
Equities
US$204.0bn
Fixed Income
US$74.8bn
Quantitative
Equities
US$45.2bn
Multi-Asset
US$39.8bn
Alternatives
US$11.0bn
Global geographic distribution
We have strong distribution platforms and deep client relationships in the US, UK, Continental
Europe, Japan and Australia, and an evolving business in Latin America and the Middle East.
North America
Total AUM
Investment professionals
Distribution professionals
US$208.8bn
173
314
Established North American distribution
network serving a diverse set of clients
across financial intermediaries, institutions
and self-directed channels.
EMEA & Latin America
Total AUM
Investment professionals
Distribution professionals
US$111.6bn
143
222
Strong retail and institutional client base in the UK with an
award-winning Investment Trust business. Strong relationships
with global distributors in Continental Europe and growing
institutional opportunities. The organic build-out of our Latin
American business is gathering momentum.
For more information go to page 13.
Asia Pacific
Total AUM
Investment professionals
Distribution professionals
US$54.4bn
48
88
Strategic partnership with Dai-ichi Life
and its partners supports the growth
of our Japanese business. Australian
distribution offers a suite of global
and domestic capabilities. The wider
Asian business continues to evolve,
with growing brand presence.
Our five strategic priorities:
Produce dependable
investment outcomes
Focus on quality and
stability of investment
performance.
Excel in client
experience
Deliver industry-leading
client experiences that
drive client loyalty and
increase duration.
Focus and increase
operational efficiency
Standardise the global
model and modernise
our infrastructure.
Proactive risk and
control environment
Embed understanding
and ownership of risk
and controls at all levels,
and establish strong
feedback loops for
learning and improvement.
Develop new
growth initiatives
Build the businesses
of tomorrow.
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 4
Chairman’s statement
Richard Gillingwater is a Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the
Board of Directors of Janus Henderson. He is currently the Chair of
the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the
Compensation Committee.
I remain optimistic
and confident in the
leadership, talent and
skills of our people, and
I believe we have the
framework in place and
the financial strength to
navigate challenges and
seize upon opportunities.”
Richard Gillingwater
Chairman
2019 marked another dramatic and significant
year for the markets and our business. Global
trade concerns, easing global monetary policies,
disruptive technology, the regulatory environment,
Brexit and geopolitical concerns generally created
a volatile environment in our key markets.
Nevertheless, US markets hit record highs,
where nearly every sector had positive returns
for the year. With the NASDAQ Composite
Index up 35% and the S&P 500® Index up 29%,
broad-based gains in the US influenced global
growth, although more negative sentiment in
European markets saw the FTSE Eurotop 100
Index close with 22% gains and UK markets
were particularly affected by Brexit concerns.
Continued trade war concerns saw the Nikkei
225 Index up 18%, comparatively.
The current environment continues to be impacted
by contradictory macroeconomic trends and
geopolitical concerns, particularly in the Middle East
and Asia, making it difficult to decipher what the
market and economic effects will be through the
remainder of 2020. In addition, specific themes
continue to impact our business, including passive
encroachment, management fee pressure, the
shift to income-oriented solutions and technology
costs. Nevertheless, I believe our focus on
fundamentals will be more important than
ever, creating increased opportunities for our
investment teams to produce excess returns
and gain market share. More generally, we have
exceptional leadership in place and the financial
strength to navigate these challenges ahead.
State of the business
At the core of our business is investment
performance, and we are pleased that 76%
of our total assets are performing ahead of
benchmarks over three years and 77% over
five years as at 31 December 2019.1 While net
outflows continued to impact our assets under
management, we were pleased to see areas of
strength in 2019. We had market share gains
in North American retail in equities, and sales
strengthened in several key international markets,
including Latin America and Continental Europe.
A number of our key products grew substantially,
including Multi-Asset, Global Strategic Fixed
Income and Multi-Sector Income strategies.
Although 2019 flows were very disappointing,
and will continue to be challenged in the near
term, they were primarily concentrated in
known areas of concern which management
is addressing. We remain encouraged by the
strength of our investment teams, the ability to
attract and retain top talent and the strength of
the firm’s financial foundation, all of which allow
us to remain committed to a strategy of Simple
Excellence. Simple Excellence for us means being
a fully-integrated provider of client outcomes
with a consistent global brand, guiding principles,
and adherence to a common reward structure,
built around the core capabilities of security
selection, portfolio construction and risk
management. This is bolstered by a focus
on having a high-quality, modern operational
platform to support the needs of our core
business with emerging areas supported by
bespoke infrastructure where needed. Important
initiatives that have underpinned our strategy of
Simple Excellence have been comprehensive
efforts to augment overall client experience,
firm-wide technology upgrades, work with
regulators to enhance product governance
disciplines, and our continued disciplined
approach to the deployment of capital.
Financial strength and
capital management
The Group’s financial position and operating
cash flows remain strong. Demonstrating the
Board’s commitment of returning excess
capital to shareholders, the Group returned
US$472 million, more than 100% of cash
flow from operations, to shareholders through
dividends and buybacks. The firm maintained
a solid dividend payout to shareholders and
decreased shares outstanding by 5% through
the completion of an on-market share buyback
programme of US$200 million. The Board
takes an active, disciplined approach to the
management of Janus Henderson’s cash and
capital resources and believes in balancing the
capital needs and the investment opportunities of
the business with shareholder interests, without
emphasising the use of leverage. Along these
lines, in February 2020 the Board approved a
new buyback programme of US$200 million to
be completed by April 2021.
1. Investment performance data represents percentage
of AUM outperforming the relevant benchmark. Full
performance disclosures detailed on the inside back cover.
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 5
Conclusion
I would like to take the opportunity to express
our thanks to our strategic partners at Dai-ichi
Life for their continued support of our business
in Japan and more widely. We are grateful for
their partnership and look forward to continuing
to nurture the relationship in the years to come.
I would also like to thank my fellow Board
members for their continued commitment, all
of our colleagues at Janus Henderson for their
dedication and hard work, and our clients and
shareholders for their ongoing support.
In conclusion, it takes time to fully unlock the value
created through a merger of equals, and as we
approach three years since the formation of
Janus Henderson, we are encouraged by the
Group’s progress: collaborative investment
teams producing strong firm-wide investment
performance, efficiencies created through
operational and technological enhancements,
and incorporation of tools and knowledge to
elevate overall client experience and support the
fulfilment of our promise to build trust by being
dependably excellent in all things. Although
there is still work to be done in 2020, I remain
optimistic and confident in the leadership, talent
and skills of our people, and I believe we have
the framework in place and the financial strength
to navigate challenges and seize upon
opportunities that the markets present us.
Richard Gillingwater
Chairman
Corporate Social Responsibility
Our clients, our shareholders and our colleagues
have become increasingly focused on the
significance and impact of sustainability in
our investment processes, our business
and our culture. The Board recognises the
importance of CSR in order to achieve
long-term sustainable success.
Many of our investment teams have incorporated
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
issues into their investment approach for some
considerable time. Within the overall corporate
framework and guidelines that have been
established by the firm, investment teams define
the ESG considerations they believe are material
to their investment approach. This is an area where
active investment, through stock selection with
regard to ESG factors, and holding companies to
account, can have a more significant impact than
simple index-related, passive investing.
Janus Henderson has a committed and
deeply-rooted focus on maintaining a workplace
that values the unique talents and contributions
of every individual. We continue to build upon a
culture and develop policies which promote
diversity and inclusion and which create equitable
opportunities for all employees to thrive. We,
as a firm, also believe in improving our global
communities through philanthropy. Through both
Janus Henderson’s Foundation and employee-led
giving, the Group’s 2,300+ employees
demonstrate a shared passion for community
service and for causes they care about in the
places they live and work.
We also believe it is important to manage
operational activities in the most sustainable way
possible to reduce our impact on the environment.
In 2019, the firm accepted an award presented
by Natural Capital Partners to celebrate 12 years
of CarbonNeutral® certification, achieved by
calculating our carbon footprint and reducing
it to zero through a combination of efficiency
measures and the procurement of carbon credits
for independently certified carbon emission
reduction projects. We remain committed to
furthering these efforts.
Corporate Social
Responsibility
At Janus Henderson we believe that CSR is
critical for our long-term sustainable success.
As a global active asset manager, our mission
is focused on helping our clients achieve their
long-term financial goals. In our business
operations, we are committed to acting
responsibly, not only in the way we invest
and engage with our clients, but also in
supporting our employees, managing our
impact on the environment and contributing
to the communities in which we work.
• Our clients. Our clients expect that we
use our knowledge and expertise to help
them achieve their long-term financial
goals. When we combine that with a deep
level of empathy for our clients’ changing
needs and an ever-changing market
landscape, we aim to set ourselves apart
from the competition and meet our clients’
needs better than any competitor.
• Responsible investing. We are focused
on delivering market-leading, risk-adjusted
investment results to our clients. We
believe that integrating ESG factors into
our investment decision-making and
ownership practices is fundamental to
achieving that goal.
• Our people. Insight from our Employee
Resource Groups helps us to build a
culture and implement policies that
promote diversity and inclusion, creating
equitable opportunities for everyone at
Janus Henderson to thrive.
• Our community. We believe that
investing goes both ways and participate
in philanthropic giving through our Janus
Henderson Foundation and through support
of our employee-led giving initiatives.
• Our environment. We are committed
to managing our operational activities in
the most sustainable way possible.
For more information go to page 14.
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 6
Chief Executive Officer’s statement
Richard Weil is Chief Executive Officer of Janus Henderson and serves
as a member of the Board of Directors. He also leads the firm’s
Executive Committee.
We are a better
company today than
we were a year ago, and
I am excited about the
opportunities in front
of us and the progress
we are making.”
Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer
2019 for Janus Henderson was a year highlighted
by excellent investment returns for our clients,
growing momentum in our retail businesses
globally, strong cash generation and important
progress towards our strategic objectives.
That said, we experienced large outflows.
Along with the rest of the industry, we faced
obstacles in the shape of intense competition,
continued growth of passive market share, fee
pressure and a difficult regulatory environment.
We are navigating these headwinds and
facilitating the changes necessary to progress,
including appointing new leadership and
team members throughout key parts of the
organisation and making progress consolidating
and improving systems and technology towards
greater operational excellence.
2019 results
In looking back on 2019, we experienced
US$27.4 billion in outflows, and while we are
accountable for that result and are taking steps
to ameliorate the risks, it is important not to lose
sight of the significant momentum in the underlying
fundamentals of our business.
Over the past year, we identified four areas
of the business as primary flow risks: Intech,
Global Emerging Markets, Core Plus Fixed
Income and European Equities. First, Intech
had US$10.8 billion of outflows driven by
performance challenges and client decisions
to rebalance portfolios. Intech made
enhancements in 2019 to their investment
process which we believe will lead to better
performance and be beneficial to clients over
time, but until we see a prolonged improvement,
this business will remain a concern. Second,
we replaced our Global Emerging Markets team,
which inevitably led to redemptions in 2019.
We are excited the newly-hired, talented Emerging
Markets team have had a promising start, and
we are optimistic about their ability to rebuild
assets in this important strategy. Third, in our
Core Plus Fixed Income business, benchmark
performance which was below client
expectations led to outflows. Performance in
the strategy has improved, and in late-2019 we
were pleased to recruit new leadership within
our US Fixed Income team and are excited to
augment the team’s existing talent. Lastly, our
European Equities strategies saw outflows in
2019 from underperformance experienced in
2017 and 2018; however, with Brexit underway
and improving performance on a one-year
basis, we are seeing progress in this business.
Turning towards the areas of positive momentum,
I believe investment performance remains the best
leading indicator for future success, and total
Company investment performance is strong.
As at 31 December 2019, 77% of our assets
were outperforming their respective benchmarks
over five years. From a retail perspective, we had
at least 76% of mutual fund AUM in the top
two Morningstar quartiles over the one-,
three- and five-year time periods, with 85%
of US mutual fund AUM having a 4- or 5-star
Overall Morningstar RatingTM.1 These are truly
excellent results, and importantly, we saw this
performance generate positive flows across many
regions and products in our retail business over
the second half of 2019.
Our Intermediary business experienced
US$2.1 billion in net inflows in the second half of
2019, reflecting 3% annualised organic growth.
Efforts of our client-facing teams drove market
share gains in some of the most competitive
markets in the world. In the fourth quarter of
2019, Continental Europe had US$700 million
of net flows, which is our best result since the
merger. For the full-year 2019, Latin American
flows were positive and product mix was diverse.
On the product side, there was substantial
growth in strategic products across Equities,
Fixed Income and Multi-Asset capabilities in
2019, including net inflows of US$4.2 billion
in the Balanced strategy, US$1.6 billion in
Multi-Sector Income and US$1.4 billion in
Global Strategic Fixed Income.
Finally, our financial foundation is solid; our
full-year adjusted operating margin was 36%,
and we ended the year with a strong balance
sheet. We continue to generate significant cash
flow, supporting ongoing investments in the
business, the US$272 million in dividends
paid to shareholders and the US$200 million
buyback. Additionally, we are pleased the
Board has authorised an additional on-market,
accretive share buyback of up to US$200 million
through April 2021.
1. Full performance, rating and ranking disclosures detailed
on the inside back cover, including additional time periods
and descriptions and quantities of assets and funds
included in the analysis. Past performance is no guarantee
of future results.
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 7
Strategy: Simple Excellence
In February 2019, we introduced our strategy
of Simple Excellence, and we believe our path
to success is dependent on delivering upon the
five pillars of our strategy.
Produce dependable investment outcomes.
The foundation of our business lies on building
trust with our clients through consistent excellence
in investment performance. Today we have
a legacy of exceptional active management,
diversified across asset classes, investment styles
and geographies. Our goal is to build on this
strength to ensure dependable delivery of
risk-adjusted returns. We believe high quality
and dependable risk-adjusted returns are built
on five basic principles: i) an investment team
that is highly intelligent, dedicated and stable;
ii) clearly articulated investment objectives,
achieved by establishing transparent Investment
Policy Statements; iii) a modern infrastructure
with strong risk management tools, allowing us
to constantly monitor and take risk intelligently;
iv) comprehensive portfolio analytics; and v)
a culture of partnership and collaboration.
I am pleased with our excellent investment
performance as these principles have been
applied within our organisation.
Excel in client experience. Our very first guiding
principle as a firm is to put our clients first. To us,
this means working diligently to understand our
clients’ needs, their interests and their desired
outcomes so we can help them achieve their
long-term financial goals. The only way we see
this coming to fruition is through our experience
promise, that we build and maintain trust by being
dependably excellent in all things. We are confident
that this approach will produce more sustainable
relationships, increased market share and longer
duration of client assets. In 2019, we launched
a client experience framework to all Janus
Henderson employees to accelerate this process,
to be even more proactive in our thought
leadership, and to rethink the way we are engaging
with our clients and responding to their needs.
Through the global Client Experience (CX)
training programme, colleagues worked together
to re-design key experiences through the eyes
of our clients. This is one example of how we
continue to re-think the client experience to turn
ideas into best practices.
Focus and increase operational efficiency.
Across our product portfolio and our global
operating model, we are standardising systems,
consolidating to a strategic data architecture, and
streamlining and reducing operational complexity.
In 2019, we successfully delivered a number of
projects across our operating model, including:
significant platform convergence of regional
customer relationship management (CRM)
systems into one global CRM system, which will
serve as a critical foundation of our distribution
business; launch of our new Global Web
Platform offering clients a better experience
and helping communicate our global brand; and
integration of additional tools to allow our sales
teams to customise client experience. In addition,
we continued to streamline our investment
product portfolio, including our decision to divest
our Milwaukee-based US subsidiary, Geneva
Capital Management.
Proactive risk and control environment. In
tandem with operational efficiency, and in today’s
evolving regulatory environment in which we do
business, it is imperative that we continue to focus
on further strengthening, refining, improving and
developing our risk and control environment, whilst
continuously building strong relationships with our
global regulators and fostering a firm-wide culture
of risk management, transparency and urgency.
Develop new growth initiatives. We continue
to organise existing capabilities and develop
new ones for the future, capitalising on
existing momentum and evaluating new
growth opportunities. Along these lines, we are
supporting our growing exchange-traded fund
(ETF) business in areas such as active fixed
income, and we have seen early successes with
more than US$1 billion in flows. In Multi-Asset
and Alternatives we continue to develop our
existing capabilities and evaluate new
opportunities, and I look forward to apprising
you of our progress in future communications.
ESG and responsible investing. Although
not explicitly one of our five strategic pillars,
we believe our history of incorporating ESG into
our investment decision-making and ownership
practices is fundamental to achieving market-
leading, sustainable, risk-adjusted long-term
investment results to our clients. Janus
Henderson’s investment teams manage
portfolios that reflect different ESG factors,
and execution of these considerations rests
with the teams. On a corporate level, we
support the investment teams in embedding
ESG considerations into their work. Active
management allows us to more deeply review,
engage and monitor our holdings in relation to key
ESG factors and provides a unique opportunity
to deliver upon client objectives. We continue to
see increased interest in our Global Sustainable
Equity strategy, and bespoke solutions are
available to meet our clients’ ESG solution needs.
Outlook
We are a better company today than we
were a year ago, and I am excited about the
opportunities in front of us and the progress
we are making. I am also proud that our efforts
and people are being recognised, including: our
Australian Fixed Interest Team won the 2019
Lonsec Money Management Fund Manager
of the Year Award for Australian Fixed Income;
Carmel Wellso, our Director of Research, won
the Global Equity Award from the Women in
Asset Management 2019 Awards Series; our
Portfolio Construction & Strategy Portal won
Best Analytics Initiative at the 2019 American
Financial Technology Awards; and
we won the prestigious 2019 CIO 100 Award,
which is a mark of enterprise excellence and
celebrates 100 organisations that are using IT
in innovative ways to deliver business value.
We are raising standards and intensity and
striving towards excellence. We have the
expertise and insight to assist our clients in their
efforts to reach their own goals, and, as an active
asset manager, it is our job to make the most
of this opportunity. I remain confident that our
excellent investment performance, alongside our
clear strategy and strong financial position, will
drive positive outcomes for clients, shareholders
and employees.
Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 8
Q&A with our Global Chief Investment Officer
In this interview, Enrique Chang, Global Chief Investment Officer at
Janus Henderson and member of the Executive Committee, reviews
2019 from an investment management perspective, exploring
developments within the business.
Q How would you
describe 2019?
In equal parts challenging and rewarding.
The strong finish to the year means that it is
easy to overlook the volatility in asset markets
over the course of 2019, whether in response to
disappointing economic data, trade tensions or
political shocks. Quantitative easing by central
banks helped to push up asset prices but returns
were uneven, with the US and the technology
sector the driving forces in equities and credit
dispersion evident within fixed income. In such
markets I am proud of the strong aggregate
performance that our portfolio managers achieved.
The challenge we had was translating that
performance into net investment flows.
Ultimately, we want to
deliver consistent, strong,
long-term risk-adjusted
returns to investors.
It is this consistency in
performance that will
help us to attract and
retain clients in today’s
competitive landscape.”
Enrique Chang
Global Chief Investment Officer
Q What would you say were
compelling successes?
Ultimately, we want to deliver consistent, strong,
long-term risk-adjusted returns to investors. It is
this consistency in performance that will help us
to attract and retain clients in today’s competitive
landscape. Where you see some of our strongest
net inflows for 2019, you see consistently good
performance.
Multi-Asset had US$3.1 billion of net inflows,
driven by consistent performance from our
Balanced strategy and ongoing interest in dynamic
and adaptive asset allocation strategies. We saw
momentum build in areas such as High Yield
where our global corporate credit team boasts a
track record of consistency at a time when clients
are seeking yield. Our Multi-Sector Income strategy
appealed to investors looking for diverse sources
of income, and we broadened our reach by making
the strategy available to clients in Europe. Being
able to take strategies and teams and market
their solutions in multiple jurisdictions is something
that the merger in 2017 has facilitated. A good
example is Absolute Return Income, which
was launched originally in Australia and
subsequently made available in the US and,
in 2019, in Europe.
We also performed well and are strongly
represented in specialist equity sectors that
reflect profitable structural themes, such as
technology (innovation and disruption), life sciences
(novel therapies and an ageing demographic),
real estate equities (growing populations) or
sustainable equities (climate change). Together,
they account for US$30 billion of equity assets,
and during 2019 we expanded availability of our
Global Sustainable Equity strategy to meet
demand from European investors.
Q What were
the challenges?
Some of the challenges were market-based.
The high stock return correlations and low stock
dispersion coupled with strong global equity
markets made it a difficult market for risk-managed
equity strategies, prompting some investors to
turn to passive or high active-risk strategies.
Together these dynamics drove net outflows
to US$10.8 billion at Intech, our Quantitative
Equities arm. It was a similar story with
Alternatives, which experienced net outflows
of US$3.6 billion. Absolute return strategies
struggled to find favour in an environment where
investors sought increased market exposure.
Within Fixed Income, there were net outflows of
US$3.9 billion, but there were specific areas that
saw the bulk of redemptions, whether that was
rebalancing away from gilts and sterling credit by
institutional investors in the UK or lower yields
encouraging clients to move further along the
risk and volatility spectrum in order to reduce
exposure to core fixed income in the US.
Other challenges were more specific to the
business. Within our Equities capability, around
a third of the net outflows of US$12.2 billion
can be attributed to turnover within our Global
Emerging Market equities team. We were,
however, able to quickly attract a high-calibre
team to replace them. It was frustrating
to see assets depart but we are excited by the
team we have brought on board – they have a
strong, well-articulated process, are particularly
well known within the US institutional community
and their performance since their arrival has been
very encouraging. We also had to make some
tough decisions, such as closing our sub-scale
Australian equities business and selling Geneva
Capital Management, aligning with our strategic
priorities of focus and simplification.
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 9
ESG oversight and
implementation
In keeping with our belief that our investment
teams should structure their processes in
ways that best deliver expected client
outcomes, we do not apply top-down rules or
an exclusionary approach to ESG integration.
Rather, each team defines the ESG
considerations they believe are material to
the long-term, sustainable growth of the
companies in which they invest.
Janus Henderson’s investment teams
manage portfolios that reflect different ESG
factors, and we also have strategies that
have a unilateral focus on sustainability. On
a corporate level, we support the investment
teams in embedding ESG considerations in
their work. This support includes centralised
functions, such as data management,
research, investment platforms and risk
management tools:
• Internal research platform. Investment
teams share relevant ESG research
produced in-house by our analysts across
a centralised research platform.
• Governance and responsible
investment team. A specialised group
which is focused on ESG analysis, company
engagement and voting that serves as
a resource for all our investment teams
and supports ESG integration throughout
the organisation.
• ESG risk reporting. ESG data is
incorporated into our risk reporting
tools, covering issues such as exposure
to companies with low ESG ratings,
controversies, weak corporate
governance and climate risk.
• ESG research, data and ratings.
We subscribe to a broad range of external
ESG information providers and make this
information available directly to the
investment teams.
Q You mentioned sustainable investing,
is this growing in priority?
Janus Henderson has a history in sustainable
investment since 1991, and the evaluation of
ESG considerations remains a key component to
our investment decision-making and ownership
practices. In fact, our Global Sustainable Equity
strategy is over US$1 billion in size, and during
2019 we expanded availability for European
investors as demand from clients has grown.
It is also important that we stay on top of
technology, particularly as the regulatory and
compliance framework plays such an important
role in our business. We continued to invest in
our IT architecture to meet transparency rules for
Packaged Retail Investment and Insurance-based
Products (PRIIPs). We also made preparations
for a new order management system that should
further enhance our trading systems, with the
transformation set to begin in 2020.
Q What excites you
about 2020?
Our more consistent performance is beginning
to be recognised, with Intermediary flows turning
positive in the second half of 2019, and I am
hopeful that we will turn the corner in 2020
with Institutional. Working in tandem with
Distribution, we have improved connectivity
across our business, and I think we can build
on the award-winning role that our Portfolio
Construction and Strategy teams have done in
articulating how our products can provide solutions.
We continue to identify and successfully establish
partnerships with clients across geographies to
help gain scale in new strategies, while strong
track records offer solid foundations to build flows
in established propositions. We saw early success
with a pension product we jointly designed with
Dai-ichi Life and launched in April. The defined
drawdown protection that this is designed to
provide, addresses the capital preservation goals
of pension funds in Japan. We also embarked on
an initiative to expand our investment solutions
into the fixed index annuity and structured space
to meet the demands of the insurance industry
by building custom indices based on adaptive
asset allocation technology. This is a fast-
growing segment within insurance, and, with our
VelocityShares® team, the firm has expertise in
indexing and structuring, helping us to compete
in this space.
We continue to deepen the integration of ESG
analysis within our investment teams with the help
of our Governance and Responsible Investment
team, a specialised group focused on ESG
analysis, company engagement and voting that
serves as a resource to all investment teams.
Additionally, we are involved in a wide range of
ESG-related initiatives – these include the UN
Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI), the
Asian Corporate Governance Association and
the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) – so we
recognise that our investment decisions and
allocation of capital can help promote long-term
responsible and sustainable business practices.
Q Beyond investing on behalf of clients,
how did you invest in the business?
Asset management is a people business, but, for
us, it is less about the individual and more about
the team. Over 2019, we saw that emphasis
sharpen as we cemented the global nature of the
Corporate Credit team, strengthened the Global
Bonds team and continued to develop the Equity
Research team. We recognise the importance of
retaining talented people, remunerating them in
a way that makes them feel valued and creating
a supportive working environment. As well as
developing people internally, we also continued to
recruit talented and experienced people externally,
including a Head of US Fixed Income and a Chief
Data Scientist for Intech.
We also strengthened our controls, bringing
further discipline to how we manage portfolios.
Investment Policy Statements were put in place
for our strategies, as we feel these documents
serve an important role in ensuring we manage
strategies in-line with their stated objectives.
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 10
Investments by capability
We offer expertise across major asset classes, with investment teams
situated around the world.
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative Equities
We offer a wide range of equity strategies
encompassing different geographic focuses and
investment styles. The equity teams include those
with a global perspective, those with a regional
focus – including the US, Europe and Asia – and
those invested in specialist sectors. These teams
generally apply processes based on fundamental
research and bottom-up stock picking.
Fixed Income provides active asset management
solutions to help clients meet their investment
objectives. Over the past four decades, our
global investment teams have developed a wide
range of product solutions to address clients’ varied
and evolving needs. From core and multi-sector
investing to more focused mandates, we offer
innovative and differentiated techniques expressly
designed to support our clients as they navigate
each unique economic cycle.
Our Quantitative Equities business, known under
the brand Intech, applies advanced mathematics
and systematic portfolio rebalancing intended
to harness the volatility of movements in stock
prices – a reliable source of excess returns and
risk control. With over 30 years of volatility
expertise, the Intech team employs a distinctive
quantitative approach based on observations
of actual price movements, not on subjective
forecasts of companies’ future performance.
AUM (US$)
204.0bn
AUM (US$)
74.8bn
AUM (US$)
45.2bn
AUM outperforming benchmark
AUM outperforming benchmark
AUM outperforming benchmark
1 year
67%
3 years
76%
5 years
80%
1 year
82%
3 years
84%
5 years
92%
1 year
37%
3 years
40%
5 years
16%
Mutual fund AUM in top 2
Morningstar quartiles
Mutual fund AUM in top 2
Morningstar quartiles
Mutual fund AUM in top 2
Morningstar quartiles
1 year
88%
3 years
87%
5 years
77%
1 year
70%
3 years
55%
5 years
56%
1 year
22%
3 years
22%
5 years
19%
Largest strategies
Largest strategies
Largest strategies
Strategy
US Mid Cap Growth
US Concentrated Growth
US Research Growth Equity
US SMID Cap Growth
Global Life Sciences
AUM
31 Dec 2019
(US$bn)
29.3
18.2
16.7
13.2
10.6
Strategy
Core Plus Fixed Income
Buy & Maintain Credit
Absolute Return Income
Global Strategic Fixed Income
Australian Fixed Income
AUM
31 Dec 2019
(US$bn)
12.7
10.0
9.3
7.7
4.6
Note: AUM outperforming benchmark represents percentage of AUM outperforming the relevant benchmark. The top two
Morningstar quartiles represent funds in the top half of their category based on total return. Full performance and ranking
disclosures detailed on the inside back cover, including additional time periods and descriptions and quantities of assets and
funds included in the analysis. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Strategy
Intech Global Large
Cap Core ex-Japan
Intech US Enhanced Plus
Intech Global Large Cap Core
Intech US Broad
Large Cap Growth
Intech Global Enhanced
Index ex-Australia ex-Tobacco
1% Risk
AUM
31 Dec 2019
(US$bn)
9.0
6.5
5.1
3.3
2.4
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 11
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Multi-Asset includes teams in the US and the UK.
In the US, our teams manage US and global asset
allocation strategies. In the UK, we have asset
allocation specialists, traditional multi-manager
investors and those focused on alternative
asset classes.
Our alternative investment strategies are designed
to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns with
moderate volatility and low correlations to
traditional asset classes. Solutions can be
constructed to consist of multiple sources
of returns with the intention of enhancing
diversification and lowering overall portfolio risk.
They include multi-strategy, alternative risk
premia, alpha capture, agriculture and global
commodities/managed futures as well as the
ability to create customised offerings.
AUM (US$)
39.8bn
AUM (US$)
11.0bn
AUM outperforming benchmark
AUM outperforming benchmark
1 year
91%
3 years
91%
5 years
93%
1 year
94%
3 years
99%
5 years
100%
Mutual fund AUM in top 2
Morningstar quartiles
Mutual fund AUM in top 2
Morningstar quartiles
1 year
93%
3 years
89%
5 years
90%
1 year
36%
3 years
74%
5 years
95%
Largest strategies
Largest strategies
Strategy
Balanced
UK Income and Growth
Multi Manager
Global Adaptive
Capital Appreciation
Multi Asset – Institutional
AUM
31 Dec 2019
(US$bn)
33.4
1.9
1.3
0.3
0.3
Strategy
UK Large Cap Absolute
Return Equity
Property
Global Commodities
Europe Large Cap Long/Short
Concentrated
Pan Europe Equity
AUM
31 Dec 2019
(US$bn)
5.6
2.8
0.6
0.6
0.4
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 12
Q&A with our Global Head of Distribution
Suzanne Cain joined Janus Henderson in May 2019 as Global Head
of Distribution and is a member of the Executive Committee. Her first
seven months have been focused on better understanding the strategic
strengths and opportunities that exist for the firm. Here, Suzanne gives
her initial impressions and outlines her vision for the future.
were already key pillars in the firm’s strategy. The
combination of high-quality active management
on a global scale and a client-first approach were,
to my mind, exactly the right foundations.
From a personal perspective, I have always liked
transformational opportunities. I could see that
Janus Henderson had many of the essential ‘puzzle
pieces’ in place, but that it would benefit from
clarity of strategy and the ability to harness its
best practices and execute around the globe.
The opportunity also aligned with the experience
I had globally in the client-facing distribution
businesses within investment banking and ETF
providers, and I now relish the chance to apply my
three decades of experience to the active space.
Q What have your initial
impressions been?
I believe a business is only as good as the people
who work for the organisation and more importantly
how they work together. I have been very
impressed with the quality and commitment of
the people at Janus Henderson and the culture
of working collaboratively between Distribution,
Investments and all central functions of the firm.
Where I feel we can improve is taking our best
approaches in different markets and applying
them globally in a market-leading way. Setting a
‘Vision Plan’ that will embrace new ways of working
and being held accountable has been my first
priority. I am a strong believer in direction-setting
based on facts and evidence. For example, using
analytical capabilities, technology and data to
understand our clients better is something we
were already doing in some regions. We will strive
to do this globally to form a deeper understanding
of our clients’ needs and behaviours before we pick
up the phone. This will also help us gain insight
into the channels and regions where we are
best suited to offer actively managed investment
strategies. Additionally, evolving our sales
approach to build enhanced client partnerships
will be a key tenet.
We will aim to strengthen our distribution channels
where we feel the strategies we offer have the
best fit and where there is the highest demand.
These efforts will include making existing areas
of strength more widely available, but also growing
our Institutional business, expanding our presence
across the Asia-Pacific and Latin America regions
and increasing our presence in the Private Banking
channel. This will in turn mean forming a sharper
view of the strategies and gaps in the market
where we can be genuinely differentiated in
this competitive environment.
Q Where do you see the main
challenges in the asset
management industry today?
While the significant change in the industry makes
many uncomfortable, I consider it a natural
evolution and an opportunity to be embraced.
Joining a business that can deliver the benefits
of a truly global organisation with world-class
capabilities is truly exciting. It means we are
particularly well-placed to serve our client base,
whose needs are being reshaped by shifting
demographics requiring different financial
outcomes, whose values and beliefs about how
they want to invest are changing and who have
higher expectations for a seamless client
experience. We see fewer decision-makers
influencing larger pools of assets, and these
clients require tailored support given the
increased constraints on their time. We need to
be the distribution team that actively and regularly
re-evaluates resources, assesses how clients
want their assets invested, and shifts products,
talent and management attention accordingly.
I believe our industry, and society as a whole,
is at a pivotal point in addressing environmental
challenges and implementing sustainable ways
of living, doing business and investing. This is
supported by what we hear from clients, with
many now considering the ESG aspects of
our investment approaches. Client viewpoints
clearly differ, but there is certainly a structural
shift underway.
With ESG already forming a key and evolving part
of what we do, we welcome the focus. We truly
believe that actively managing client assets and
engaging with companies is the best way to
support sustainable investment practices. We
believe that addressing ESG effectively is
fundamentally an active management decision.
Our investment teams continuously connect with
thousands of companies, in many cases as part
of long-standing relationships. We already have
an established ESG-focused strategy in Europe
with more than a 25-year track record and are
working on increasing flexibility to meet
customised preferences and values for different
clients. We believe that how companies approach
their ESG responsibilities will be a key differentiator
in achieving long-term success and, in turn,
helping us deliver outperformance for clients.
I have been very
impressed with the
quality and commitment
of the people at Janus
Henderson and the
culture of working
collaboratively between
Distribution, Investments
and all central functions
of the firm.”
Suzanne Cain
Global Head of Distribution
Q What attracted you to
Janus Henderson?
When doing my research on the firm, it was clear
Janus Henderson had a unique global reach in
delivering truly active management to its clients
and had a high caliber of people. What impressed
me, however, was the level of priority given to client
considerations in setting corporate strategy. There
was a genuine conviction that creating long-term
value for shareholders was best achieved by
always having the client top-of-mind in making
any business or financial decisions. It was important
to me to be at a firm that fostered a client-centric
culture. Additionally, I was gratified to learn that
operational excellence and client experience
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 13
Global distribution footprint1
Total AUM
(US$)
Global distribution
professionals
374.8bn 624
North America
AUM (US$)
Distribution
professionals
314
208.8bn
Growth opportunities
• Leverage strong long-term track records
in flagship portfolios
• Continue to expand Institutional business
through depth and breadth of investment
strategy offering
• Build brand presence, with
Knowledge. Shared ethos
EMEA & Latin America
AUM (US$)
Distribution
professionals
222
111.6bn
Growth opportunities
• Leverage increased distribution footprint,
driving cross-selling opportunities
• Maintain UK market share and capitalise
on retail opportunities in Europe
• Institutional opportunities in Europe and
the Middle East
• Develop relationships with global
financial institutions
• Capitalise on opportunities within
Latin America
Asia Pacific
AUM (US$)
Distribution
professionals
88
54.4bn
Growth opportunities
• Maximise strategic partnership with
Dai-ichi Life and its partners
• Build on strong brand presence to
leverage enhanced product suite
• Leverage the strong capabilities of our
fixed income teams in Australia
• Cross-sell in broader Asia Pacific region
1. Location of client AUM as at 31 December 2019.
the best insights of our investment teams and
highlights products that help clients stay the course
towards their investment goals. In the current
market environment, we are keenly aware that
political developments, trade tensions, geopolitical
concerns and a deluge of information leave many
unsure of how to navigate markets; this campaign
seeks to help clients make better informed
decisions against a challenging backdrop.
We also have a strong history of providing
professional development programmes for our
clients in North America. This supports Wellness
and Practice Management and falls under our
Knowledge Labs® offering. Programmes like the
‘Art of WOW’, ‘The Science of Negotiations’
and ‘Energy for Performance’ can help us add
value over and above excellent investment
performance. We are exploring ways to make
all of this available globally. A strong history on
which to build also applies to our closed-ended
Investment Trust business in the UK. Here, we
trace our roots to 1934 and the management of
the family estate of Alexander Henderson. The
range of Trusts we manage has been built out
ever since, and we are now one of the largest
closed-ended managers in the UK with
responsibility for US$9 billion in assets. 2019
saw continued strength in the business with
new shares issued to meet increased demand.
There is a strong commitment from my new
Distribution leadership team to focus squarely
on clients’ needs. We know we need to continue
to improve on client experience as one of our most
important strategic priorities. This commitment
was underpinned in 2019 with more than 1,000
of our employees attending one of our Client
Experience (CX) workshops. While all parts of
Janus Henderson contribute, the client experience
is what our distribution teams stand for day-in and
day-out. With more than 20 million customers
around the globe, we will be focusing not only
on delivering strong investment returns, but also
constantly striving to improve our client service
to earn the right to be a true long-term partner in
our client’s investment journey. I am delighted to
be leading the excellent distribution teams here
as we progress towards that goal.
Q Do you see a widespread need to
embrace new ways of thinking?
Yes, rather than serving clients based on regional
location or channel-oriented segmentation, we are
looking at behaviours and adopting a ‘needs-based’
solutions driven model. We need to be asking
ourselves, if an investment strategy works for a
client in the US, for example, how can we replicate
that for a Continental European client that has a
similar need? Having a strong Business Intelligence
Unit to measure flows and identify themes well in
advance will allow us to be forward thinking and
have an edge on our competitors. We aim to be
technologically savvy and make ever greater use
of integrated data and client analytic engines.
Having an integrated Distribution organisation that
includes Product functions and Marketing globally,
enables real-time connectivity and consistent
delivery of product across geographies. We will
aim to deliver the right product to the right client
at the right time. As evidence of how well that can
work, in 2019 we not only raised US$2.8 billion of
net new flows into our Balanced strategy (a blend
of US equities and fixed income) in North America,
but also raised more than US$700 million of
net new flows in Continental Europe and
US$500 million in Latin America. This
demonstrates the power of understanding
client needs in different regions and packaging
successful investment capabilities accordingly.
Q In addition to the people, what
other strong competencies do
you think you can build on?
There are many strong competencies that we
already have in place that we will continue to invest
in globally. This includes our award-winning
Portfolio Construction and Strategy (PCS) team,
which performs instant customised analyses to
help identify product opportunities and to deliver
data-driven diagnostics and insights. We have
already invested in resources to make this offering
available to advisory and institutional clients
globally in 2020. It was pleasing to see the
approach of the PCS team externally recognised
as winner of the Best Analytics Initiative at the
2019 American Financial Technology Awards.
Being able to accurately gauge our clients’
concerns and address them in a timely manner
through market leading content and
communications will continue to be a priority,
in line with our Knowledge. Shared ethos.
An example of this is our global ‘Uncertainty’
campaign, which actively shares, in real time,
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 14
Corporate Social Responsibility
Our unwavering and deeply-rooted dedication to our clients,
communities, our people and our environment saw momentum
during 2019, and we continue working to fulfil our commitments
for these key strategic areas.
Our clients
Our very first guiding principle as a firm is to
put our clients first. To us, this means working
diligently to understand their needs, interests
and desired outcomes so we can help them
achieve their long-term financial goals. Our goal
is to deliver on our experience promise, that we
build and maintain trust by being dependably
excellent in all things.
Our people
Our people-focused culture is driven by
collaboration and connection, and it celebrates
diversity and a shared passion for giving back to
the places we live and work. It is through the
diversity of our people – whose varied skills,
backgrounds and cultures shape our outlook –
that we can explore unique avenues and uncover
opportunities unseen by others in our industry.
Make it Personal. We seek to see the world
through our clients’ eyes and understand their
purpose. We ask the hard questions and listen
intently, empathising with challenges and
anticipating needs.
We are committed to creating an inclusive
environment that promotes equality, cultural
awareness and respect by implementing
policies, benefits, training, recruiting and
recognition practices to support our colleagues.
Our community
The Janus Henderson Foundation
The Janus Henderson Foundation is the
primary charitable giving arm of Janus
Henderson Group. The Foundation makes a
difference in our community by helping youth
achieve their full potential through access to
better educational opportunities. We invest in
innovative programmes that prepare our youth
to achieve academic success and evolve to be
the future leaders of tomorrow, which strongly
aligns with the United Nations Sustainable
Development Goal of Quality Education.
Selected 2019 partnerships:
• Junior Achievement (JA) Titan Global.
Prepares young people to succeed in a
global economy, through virtual business
simulations and a comprehensive
economic, business management and
financial curriculum.
• TutorMate. Enables volunteer, working
professionals to tutor students remotely in
core reading skills on a weekly basis,
focusing on fluency and comprehension.
Key diversity and inclusion
accomplishments in 2019:
• Implemented a sabbatical
leave programme
• Enhanced our US Family Leave Pay
and our UK Shared Parental Leave Pay
to align better with industry standards
• Implemented a global Adoption
Assistance Programme
• Delivered Unconscious Bias Training
• KickStart Money UK. Coalition of
savings and investment firms working to
improve the provision of financial
education in primary schools to create a
movement that focuses on financial
literacy and a culture of saving.
• Angkor Hospital for Children (AHC).
Aims to address challenges of health
inequality and help children in rural
Cambodia not only survive but thrive.
to employees globally
• Included in the 2020 Bloomberg Gender
Equality Index and 2020 Human Rights
Campaign Corporate Equality Index for
our inclusive practices and policies
• Increased women in senior leadership
roles by 4% to 29%; 39% of employees
globally are women
• Improved our Gender Pay Gap in 2019
versus 2018*
* We take a global approach to managing compensation
and strive to ensure that our compensation and reward
programmes are externally competitive and internally
equitable to support company strategy and to attract,
motivate and retain talented employees. Our gender pay
gap is driven by a greater proportion of men than women
in the highest paying positions and not by unequal pay for
men and women doing substantially similar work.
Set Our Intention. For every ‘what’ we do,
there is a ‘why’ we do it. By setting a client-
focused intention before everything we do,
we consider the next step proactively and keep
client goals in mind. These intentions establish
our path forward to define what we are working
towards and how we will get there.
Be a Knowledge Partner. We stay open-minded,
challenge what we know and obsess over the
details. This constant pursuit of knowledge and
insight enables us to create solutions that clients
can trust. By sharing what we learn, we can help
guide to smart, confident decisions.
Responsible investing
We believe that integrating ESG factors into
our investment decision-making and ownership
practices is fundamental to delivering market-
leading, risk-adjusted long-term investment
results to our clients. We measure our success
based on the outcomes we deliver to clients,
and we understand that for many clients, the
actual holdings of their portfolio are an important
consideration in combination with their
investment results.
For more information on our commitment to
responsible investing go to page 9.
BUSINESS REVIEWJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 15
2
5
1
3
4
Employee-led giving
We believe it is important for our colleagues to
be actively involved in global volunteering and
service to build a workplace that attracts and
retains the best talent, extends the Janus
Henderson brand and serves the communities
where we live and work.
Select employee-led contributions:
• Logged 1,845 hours of employee
community investment time
• Donated a monetary value of US$46,906
in volunteer hours to charities
• Employee Matching Gift Contributions:
US$139,565 amount matched and
343 charities supported
• Give as You Earn Match Programme:
£71,134 amount matched and 116
charities supported
Our Environment
We recognise the importance of managing our
operational activities in the most sustainable way
possible, and we continue to work on reducing
unavoidable carbon emissions and increasing
our transparency in disclosure. In recognition of
these efforts, Janus Henderson was awarded
the 12 years of CarbonNeutral® certification from
Natural Capital Partners in 2019.
Our environmental commitments:
• Maintain our Carbon Neutral status
• Reduce our carbon use by 15% per
full-time employee over a three-year
period – starting January 2019*
• Maintain a CDP Score of B
* 2018 was the first full year of measured emissions
as Janus Henderson Group.
For more information on our dedication to CSR,
please read our 2019 Impact Report online at
janushenderson.com/ir.
1 Reaching new heights by participating in the 14er Challenge
2 Denver colleagues building bikes for students
3 London employees visiting their TutorMate students
4 Intech employees taking a moment to clean up local parks
5 Children in Cambodia assisted by the AHC Treatment, Education and Prevention Truck
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 16
Board of Directors
The Board comprises a Non-Executive Chairman,
a Non-Executive Deputy Chairman, one Executive
Director and seven other Non-Executive Directors.
Richard
Gillingwater
Chairman; Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Chair
Richard Gillingwater has been a Non-Executive
Director and Chairman of Janus Henderson
since May 2017. He was a Non-Executive
Director of the Henderson Group Board from
February 2013 to May 2017, taking the
position of Chairman in May 2013. He is
currently the Chair of the Nominating and
Governance Committee and a member of
the Compensation Committee.
Glenn Schafer
Deputy Chairman
Glenn Schafer has been a Non-Executive
Director and Deputy Chairman of Janus
Henderson since May 2017. He was
a Director of Janus Capital Group from
December 2007 to May 2017, taking the
position of Chairman in April 2012. He is
currently a member of the Compensation
Committee and the Nominating and
Governance Committee.
Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer and
Executive Director
Richard Weil is Chief Executive Officer of
Janus Henderson and has been an Executive
Director since May 2017. Mr Weil was Chief
Executive Officer of Janus Capital Group
from February 2010 to May 2017.
Kalpana Desai
Independent Non-Executive Director
Kalpana Desai has been a Non-Executive
Director of Janus Henderson since May 2017.
Ms Desai was a Non-Executive Director of
Henderson Group from October 2015 to May
2017 and is currently a member of the Audit
Committee, Risk Committee and Nominating
and Governance Committee.
Jeffrey Diermeier
Independent Non-Executive Director;
Audit Committee Chair
Jeffrey Diermeier has been a Non-Executive
Director of Janus Henderson since May 2017.
Mr Diermeier was an Independent Director
of Janus Capital Group from March 2008 to
May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the
Audit Committee and a member of the
Nominating and Governance Committee
and the Risk Committee.
Kevin Dolan
Independent Non-Executive Director
Kevin Dolan has been a Non-Executive
Director of Janus Henderson since May
2017. Mr Dolan was a Non-Executive
Director of Henderson Group from
September 2011 to May 2017 and is
currently a member of the Nominating
and Governance Committee, the Audit
Committee and the Risk Committee.
GOVERNANCEJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 17
For full Director biographies go to pages
114 to 119, item 10 on Form 10-K – Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Eugene Flood Jr.
Independent Non-Executive Director;
Risk Committee Chair
Lawrence Kochard
Independent Non-Executive Director;
Compensation Committee Chair
Eugene Flood Jr. has been a Non-Executive
Director of Janus Henderson since May
2017. Mr Flood was a Non-Executive Director
of Janus Capital Group from January 2014
to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the
Risk Committee and a member of the Audit
Committee and the Nominating and
Governance Committee.
Lawrence Kochard has been a Non-Executive
Director of Janus Henderson since May 2017.
Mr Kochard was an Independent Director
of Janus Capital Group from March 2008
to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the
Compensation Committee and a member of
the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Angela Seymour-Jackson
Independent Non-Executive Director
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto
Independent Non-Executive Director
Angela Seymour-Jackson has been a
Non-Executive Director of Janus Henderson
since May 2017. Ms Seymour-Jackson was
a Non-Executive Director of Henderson Group
from January 2014 to May 2017 and is
currently a member of the Compensation
Committee and the Nominating and
Governance Committee. She also chairs
Henderson Global Holdings Asset
Management Limited (a holding company
of the legacy Henderson Group).
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto has been a
Non-Executive Director of Janus Henderson
since May 2017. Mr Yamamoto was an
Independent Director of Janus Capital Group
from July 2015 to May 2017 and is currently
a member of the Nominating and
Governance Committee.
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 18
Governance overview
An overview of governance structure,
Board business and skills.
Janus Henderson views good corporate
governance as essential to achieving the goals
of the organisation. The Janus Henderson Group
Board comprises a Non-Executive Chairman, a
Non-Executive Deputy Chairman, one Executive
Director and seven other Non-Executive Directors
who meet in London and Denver. The Board has
delegated specific responsibilities to four standing
Committees of the Board. A copy of the matters
reserved to the Board is available on our website
at janushenderson.com/ir.
Board business
The Board met throughout the course of the year.
An overview of the topics addressed by the Board
during the year is provided in the summary overleaf.
A typical Board agenda is ordered so that the
strategic items and projects are considered
first. Depending on the importance of the
items, either regulatory or finance items are
considered at the beginning, capital and budget
items are considered next, followed by other
business matters. The items that do not require
detailed consideration or discussion are set out
at the end of the agenda. Where possible, items
are grouped together to ensure that the items
flow according to topic and that management’s
time is used effectively when presenting.
Sessions are usually provided which include
training or presentations from the business
during days on which Board meetings are held.
Committees
Janus Henderson has four standing committees
of the Group Board: Audit, Compensation,
Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Risk.
Audit
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring
the reliability and appropriateness of the Group’s
financial reporting, reviewing the qualifications,
performance and independence of the
independent auditors (as well as being responsible
for recommending their appointment,
reappointment and removal), assessing the
effectiveness of the Internal Audit function, and
reviewing the Group’s compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements. Ultimate responsibility
for reviewing and approving the Group’s financial
reporting and other public reports, declarations
and statements remains with the Board. The
Committee is chaired by Jeffrey Diermeier.
Governance structure
Janus
Henderson
Group plc
Board
Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Nominating
and Corporate
Governance
Committee
Risk
Committee
CEO:
Richard Weil
Executive
Committee
Other
operating
committees
Ethics and
Conflicts
Committee
Compensation
The Compensation Committee is responsible
for determining the remuneration of the CEO,
certain other executive officers and the Group’s
independent directors. The Committee is chaired
by Lawrence Kochard.
Nominating and Corporate Governance
The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee has responsibility for considering
the size, composition, expertise and balance
of the Board as well as succession planning.
The Committee is also responsible for
recommending the applicable Corporate
Governance Guidelines to the Board and
oversees the Board’s annual evaluation. The
Committee is chaired by Richard Gillingwater.
Risk
The purpose of the Risk Committee is to assist
the Board in the oversight of risk. The Committee
also looks to identify any forward-looking and
emerging risks that relate to the industry or
Janus Henderson specifically, and will refresh
and monitor these risks and look at mitigating
actions on an ongoing basis. The Committee is
chaired by Eugene Flood Jr.
Training
To ensure that the Directors continually update
their skills and knowledge, all Directors receive
regular presentations on different aspects of
the Group’s business and on financial, legal and
regulatory matters affecting our sector. During
2019, all Janus Henderson Directors received
presentations on Strategy, Cyber Security,
Client Experience (CX) and Governance.
Relations with shareholders
Janus Henderson conducts an active Investor
Relations (IR) programme, engaging with
shareholders across the Group’s two listings.
In 2019, management and IR conducted over
210 individual meetings with existing and potential
shareholders in London, Sydney, Melbourne,
New York, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco
and Denver.
This included two roadshows to Australia and two
roadshows to the US to engage with shareholders
following results announcements, as well as
attendance at one investor conference in London
and two investor conferences in New York.
GOVERNANCEJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 19
2019 Director attendance at Board and Committee meetings
Seven meetings were held by the Janus Henderson Group plc Board during 2019, on: 4 and 25 to
26 February, 1 to 2 May, 30 July, 2 August, 28 to 29 October and 10 December.
Board and Committee meetings attended
An overview of the topics
addressed by the Board
in 2019
February
Board and Committee meetings attended
• 4Q18 and FY18 results & 4Q18 dividend
Date
appointed
Board
Audit Compensation
Nominating
and
Governance
Richard Gillingwater
30 May ’17
Glenn Schafer
30 May ’17
Richard Weil
Sarah Arkle1
30 May ’17
30 May ’17
Kalpana Desai2
30 May ’17
Jeffrey Diermeier
30 May ’17
Kevin Dolan3
30 May ’17
Eugene Flood Jr.
30 May ’17
Lawrence Kochard
30 May ’17
Angela
Seymour-Jackson
30 May ’17
7/7
6/7
7/7
2/2
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
7/7
n/a
n/a
n/a
2/2
7/7
7/7
5/5
7/7
n/a
n/a
6/6
6/6
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
6/6
6/6
3/3
3/3
n/a
1/1
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
3/3
Risk
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
4/4
5/5
5/5
5/5
n/a
n/a
Tatsusaburo
Yamamoto
30 May ’17
7/7
n/a
n/a
3/3
n/a
Notes
Mr Schafer missed one meeting due to scheduling conflicts.
1. Ms Arkle resigned as a Director on 26 February 2019.
2. Ms Desai joined the Risk Committee on 1 April 2019.
3. Mr Dolan joined the Audit Committee on 1 April 2019.
The Board regularly receives feedback on
shareholder sentiment and sell-side analysts’
views of the Group and the wider industry. Board
members welcome the opportunity to learn more
about shareholders’ interests in Janus Henderson.
Equally, management receives updates on
shareholder engagement, topics raised and
key discussion points.
In the course of a year, Janus Henderson gives
four scheduled updates to the market in addition
to our Annual General Meeting. The IR team
and management have frequent contact with
the 18 sell-side analysts who follow
Janus Henderson.
ASX Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations
Details of Janus Henderson’s compliance with
the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and
Recommendations during the reporting period
are available on the Company’s website at
janushenderson.com/ir.
Diversity
Janus Henderson fosters and maintains an
environment that values the unique talents and
contributions of every individual. We know that
having a diverse and inclusive workplace will
support our strategic vision. We invite you
to review our Commitment to Diversity and
recent initiatives on our website at
janushenderson.com/diversity.
• Capital plan
• Approval of on-market share buyback
programme
• Brexit impact, strategy and programme
• Effectiveness of the Group’s system of risk
management and internal controls
May
• 1Q19 results & dividend
• Succession planning
• Risk appetite
July/August
• 2Q19 results & dividend
• Client Experience (CX)
• Employee engagement survey results
• Culture and conduct
• Cyber security
October
• 3Q19 results & dividend
• Group strategy
• Brexit impact, strategy and programme
• Annual review of Board Committees’
charters and governance documents
• Board and Committees self-evaluation
December
• Review of FY19 forecast & 2020 budget
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 20
Governance overview continued
Board skills
Janus Henderson share register (%)
Asset
Management
International
Finance
Risk
Client Focus
Acquisitions
Richard Gillingwater
Glenn Schafer
Richard Weil
Kalpana Desai
Jeffrey Diermeier
Kevin Dolan
Eugene Flood Jr.
Lawrence Kochard
Angela
Seymour-Jackson
Tatsusaburo
Yamamoto
NYSE listing
Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.
UK Depositary Interests
ASX listing
77
16
2
23
Corporate Social Responsibility
We believe that a comprehensive CSR strategy
is critical for our long-term, sustainable success.
We seek to deliver value to our clients by looking
beyond the numbers and evaluating how our
decisions impact our world. We accomplish this
by focusing on five key CSR pillars: our clients,
responsible investing, our people, our community
and our environment.
Responsible investment
We seek to be responsible stewards of our
clients’ capital and empower our investment
teams to develop their own distinct approach
for their asset class and client base. Janus
Henderson supports ESG integration through a
framework that includes a wide range of tools
and shared resources as well as appropriate risk
management and controls. These measures are
designed to ensure investment teams are aware
of ESG risks and opportunities and are meeting
client expectations. Our approach reinforces our
belief that ESG factors are critical ingredients
for long-term business success.
Directors’ report
Further disclosures, where applicable to the
Company, are contained in the sections of this
Annual Report and Accounts identified below and
form part of the Directors’ report for the period:
The Directors confirm that to the best of
their knowledge:
• the financial records of the Group and
Company have been properly maintained;
• pages 31 to 52, Item 7 on Form
10-K – Management’s Discussion
and Analysis;
• pages 114 to 121, Item 10 on Form
10-K – Directors, Executive Officers
and Corporate Governance; and
• pages 122 to 134, Item 11 on Form
10-K – Executive Compensation.
Financial reporting
The Directors are required to prepare and
approve the financial statements for the Group
and Company in accordance with Jersey law for
each financial year which show a true and fair
view of the state of affairs of the Group and the
Company and of the profit or loss of the Group
for that period in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. The Directors
have elected to prepare the Group and Company
financial statements in accordance with US
generally accepted accounting principles
(US GAAP).
• the financial statements of the Group and
Company comply with US GAAP and give
a true and fair view of the financial position
and performance of the Group and Company;
and
• this opinion has been formed on the basis
of a sound system of risk management and
internal control which is operating effectively.
Signed in accordance with a resolution
of the Directors:
Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer
26 February 2020
Roger Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
26 February 2020
GOVERNANCEJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
21
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of Janus Henderson
Group plc
Opinion on the Consolidated
Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Janus Henderson Group plc and
its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of 31 December
2019, and the related consolidated statements of
comprehensive income, of changes in equity and
of cash flows for the year then ended, including
the related notes (collectively referred to as the
“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion,
the consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of the Company as of 31 December 2019, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
of America and have been properly prepared
in accordance with the requirements of the
Companies (Jersey) Law 1991.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for
these consolidated financial statements. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements
based on our audit. We are a public accounting
firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB) and are required to be independent
with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the
standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud.
Our audit of the consolidated financial statements
included performing procedures to assess the
risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due
to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding
the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. Our audit also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated financial statements. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is
a matter arising from the current period audit of
the consolidated financial statements that was
communicated or required to be communicated
to the audit committee and that (i) relates to
accounts or disclosures that are material to the
consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved
our especially challenging, subjective, or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit
matters does not alter in any way our opinion on
the consolidated financial statements, taken as
a whole, and we are not, by communicating the
critical audit matter below, providing a separate
opinion on the critical audit matter or on the
accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment Assessment of Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets Related to Certain Investment
Management Agreements
As described in Notes 2 and 7 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company’s indefinite-
lived intangible assets balance related to
investment management agreements of
US$2.5 billion as of 31 December 2019
includes certain investment management
agreements with a total carrying value of
US$299.6 million as of 31 December 2019, net
of an US$18 million impairment recognized in
2019, that management tested for impairment
during the year ended 31 December 2019.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for
impairment annually on 1 October, or more
frequently if changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may be impaired. If the
fair value is less than the carrying amount, an
impairment is recognized. Management used a
discounted cash flow model to determine the
estimated fair value. Some of the inputs used in
the discounted cash flow model required
significant management judgement, including
the discount rate, terminal growth rate, and
forecasted financial results.
The principal considerations for our determination
that performing procedures relating to the
impairment assessment of indefinite-lived
intangible assets related to certain investment
management agreements is a critical audit matter
are there was significant judgment by management
when developing the fair value measurement of
the intangible assets, which in turn led to a high
degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and
effort in performing procedures to evaluate
management’s cash flow projections and
significant assumptions, including the discount
rate, terminal growth rate, and forecasted financial
results. In addition, the audit effort involved the
use of professionals with specialized skill and
knowledge to assist in performing these
procedures and evaluating the audit
evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing
procedures and evaluating audit evidence in
connection with forming our overall opinion on
the consolidated financial statements. These
procedures included testing the effectiveness of
controls relating to the impairment assessment
of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including
controls over the valuation of the indefinite-lived
intangible assets related to certain investment
management agreements. These procedures
also included, among others (i) testing
management’s process for developing the fair
value estimate, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness
of the discounted cash flow model, (iii) testing the
completeness, accuracy, and relevance of
underlying data used in the model, and (iv)
evaluating the significant assumptions used by
management, including the discount rate, terminal
growth rate, and forecasted financial results.
Evaluating management’s assumptions related
to the discount rate, terminal growth rate, and
forecasted financial results involved evaluating
whether the assumptions used by management
were reasonable considering (i) the current and
past performance of the investment companies
subject to the investment management
agreements, (ii) the consistency with external
market and industry data, and (iii) whether these
assumptions were consistent with evidence
obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals
with specialized skill and knowledge were used
to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s
discounted cash flow model and certain significant
assumptions, including the discount rate.
Report on other legal and regulatory
requirements
Under the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 we
are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
• we have not received all the information and
explanations we require for our audit;
• proper accounting records have not been
kept; or
• the consolidated financial statements are not
in agreement with the accounting records.
We have no exceptions to report arising from
this responsibility.
David Foss
For and on behalf of
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
Denver, CO
26 February 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor
since 2019.
Janus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019 22
-
K
0
1
M
R
O
F
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
UNITED STATES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
OR
OF 1934
OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-38103
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Jersey, Channel Islands
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
201 Bishopsgate
London, United Kingdom
(Address of principal executive offices)
98-1376360
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
EC2M3AE
(Zip Code)
+44 (0) 20 7818 1818
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $1.50 Per Share Par Value
JHG
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised
financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x
As of June 30, 2019, the aggregate market value of common equity held by non-affiliates was $4,101,251,620.80. As of February 21, 2020, there were 186,975,693
shares of the Company’s common stock, $1.50 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Table of Contents FORM 10-KJanus Henderson Group plc Annual Report 2019
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-38103
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Jersey, Channel Islands
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
201 Bishopsgate
London, United Kingdom
(Address of principal executive offices)
98-1376360
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
EC2M3AE
(Zip Code)
+44 (0) 20 7818 1818
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $1.50 Per Share Par Value
JHG
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerx
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised
financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No x
As of June 30, 2019, the aggregate market value of common equity held by non-affiliates was $4,101,251,620.80. As of February 21, 2020, there were 186,975,693
shares of the Company’s common stock, $1.50 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Table of Contents
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
2019 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
PART I
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Janus
Henderson Group plc
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
PART III
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
PART IV
Page
3
11
27
27
27
27
28
30
31
52
55
113
113
114
114
122
134
137
140
141
146
147
2
Table of Contents
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
2019 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
PART II
Item 1. Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Equity Securities
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Henderson Group plc
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Janus
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
PART III
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
PART IV
Page
3
11
27
27
27
27
28
30
31
52
55
113
113
114
114
122
134
137
140
141
146
147
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I
Certain statements in this report not based on historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
the federal securities laws, including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (“Securities Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that
are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those
discussed. These include statements as to our future expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, events,
conditions, financial performance, prospects, or future events. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,”
“estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “likely,” “will,” “would” and similar words and phrases. Forward-
looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by us and our
management, are inherently uncertain. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date they are made, and are not guarantees of future performance. We do not undertake any
obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements.
Various risks, uncertainties, assumptions and factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from those
expressed by the forward-looking statements included in this report include, but are not limited to, risks, uncertainties,
assumptions and factors discussed under “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of Janus Henderson Group plc” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk,” and in other documents filed or furnished by us with the SEC from time to time.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Janus Henderson Group plc (“JHG,” the “Group,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms), a company
incorporated and registered in Jersey, Channel Islands, is an independent global asset manager, specializing in active
investment across all major asset classes.
On May 30, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), JHG (previously Henderson Group plc (“Henderson”)) completed a merger of
equals with Janus Capital Group Inc. (“JCG”) (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, JCG and its consolidated
subsidiaries became subsidiaries of JHG.
We are a client-focused global business with approximately 2,300 employees worldwide and assets under management
(“AUM”) of $374.8 billion as of December 31, 2019. We have operations in North America, the United Kingdom
(“UK”), Continental Europe, Latin America, Japan, Asia and Australia. We focus on active fund management by
investment managers with unique individual perspectives, who are free to implement their own investment views, within
a strong risk management framework.
We manage a broad range of actively managed investment products for institutional and retail investors across five
capabilities: Equities, Fixed Income, Quantitative Equities, Multi-Asset and Alternatives.
Clients entrust money to us — either their own or money they manage or advise on for their clients — and expect us to
deliver the benefits specified in their mandate or by the prospectus for the fund in which they invest. We measure the
amount of these funds as AUM. Growth in AUM is a key objective of ours. AUM increases or decreases primarily
depending on our ability to attract and retain client investments, on investment performance, and as a function of market
and currency movements. To the extent that we invest in new asset management teams or businesses or divest from
existing ones, this is also reflected in AUM.
Clients pay a management fee, which is usually calculated as a percentage of AUM. Certain investment products are also
subject to performance fees, which vary based on a product’s relative performance as compared to a benchmark index.
The level of assets subject to such fees can positively or negatively affect our revenue. As of December 31, 2019,
2
3
Table of Contents Table of Contents
performance fees were generated from a diverse group of funds and accounts. Management and performance fees are the
primary drivers of our revenue. We believe that the more diverse the range of investment strategies from which
management and performance fees are derived, the more successful our business model will be.
Our Strategy: Simple Excellence
● Produce dependable investment outcomes – focus on quality and stability of investment performance.
● Excel in client experience – deliver industry-leading client experiences that drive client loyalty and build long-
term relationships.
● Focus and increase operational efficiency – standardize the global model and modernize our infrastructure.
● Proactive risk and control environment – embed understanding and ownership of risk and controls at all levels
and establish strong feedback loops for learning and improvement.
● Develop new growth initiatives – build the businesses of tomorrow.
Investment Offerings
Equities
We offer a wide range of equity strategies encompassing different geographic focuses and investment styles. The equity
teams include those with a global perspective, those with a regional focus — United States (“U.S.”), Europe and Asia —
and those invested in specific sectors. These teams generally apply processes based on fundamental research and
bottom-up stock picking.
Fixed Income
Our Fixed Income teams provide coverage across the asset class, applying a wide range of innovative and differentiated
techniques in support of a variety of investment objectives and risk criteria. Our fixed income offering includes teams
that apply global unconstrained approaches as well as teams with more focused mandates — based in the U.S., Europe,
Asia and Australia. The capabilities of these teams can be accessed through individual strategies and, where appropriate,
are combined to create multi-strategy offerings.
Quantitative Equities
The Intech Investment Management LLC (“Intech”) business applies advanced mathematics and systematic portfolio
rebalancing intended to harness the volatility of movements in stock prices — a reliable source of excess returns and risk
control. With more than 30 years of volatility expertise, the Intech team employs a distinctive quantitative approach
based on observations of actual price movements, not on subjective forecasts of companies’ future performance.
Multi-Asset
Our Multi-Asset capability includes teams in the U.S. and UK that focus on balanced, multi-asset income and strategic
asset allocation, as well as multiple adaptive asset allocation strategies.
Alternatives
Our Alternatives capability includes teams with various areas of focus and approach. Diversified Alternatives brings
together a cross-asset class combination of alpha generation, risk management and efficient beta replication strategies.
These include Global Multi-Strategy, Managed Futures, Risk Premia and Global Commodities; Agriculture; and
Long/Short Equity. Additionally, the management of our direct UK commercial property offering is sub-advised by
Nuveen Real Estate.
4
Table of Contents performance fees were generated from a diverse group of funds and accounts. Management and performance fees are the
primary drivers of our revenue. We believe that the more diverse the range of investment strategies from which
management and performance fees are derived, the more successful our business model will be.
Our Strategy: Simple Excellence
● Produce dependable investment outcomes – focus on quality and stability of investment performance.
● Excel in client experience – deliver industry-leading client experiences that drive client loyalty and build long-
term relationships.
● Focus and increase operational efficiency – standardize the global model and modernize our infrastructure.
● Proactive risk and control environment – embed understanding and ownership of risk and controls at all levels
and establish strong feedback loops for learning and improvement.
● Develop new growth initiatives – build the businesses of tomorrow.
Investment Offerings
Equities
bottom-up stock picking.
Fixed Income
We offer a wide range of equity strategies encompassing different geographic focuses and investment styles. The equity
teams include those with a global perspective, those with a regional focus — United States (“U.S.”), Europe and Asia —
and those invested in specific sectors. These teams generally apply processes based on fundamental research and
Our Fixed Income teams provide coverage across the asset class, applying a wide range of innovative and differentiated
techniques in support of a variety of investment objectives and risk criteria. Our fixed income offering includes teams
that apply global unconstrained approaches as well as teams with more focused mandates — based in the U.S., Europe,
Asia and Australia. The capabilities of these teams can be accessed through individual strategies and, where appropriate,
are combined to create multi-strategy offerings.
Quantitative Equities
The Intech Investment Management LLC (“Intech”) business applies advanced mathematics and systematic portfolio
rebalancing intended to harness the volatility of movements in stock prices — a reliable source of excess returns and risk
control. With more than 30 years of volatility expertise, the Intech team employs a distinctive quantitative approach
based on observations of actual price movements, not on subjective forecasts of companies’ future performance.
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Our Multi-Asset capability includes teams in the U.S. and UK that focus on balanced, multi-asset income and strategic
asset allocation, as well as multiple adaptive asset allocation strategies.
Our Alternatives capability includes teams with various areas of focus and approach. Diversified Alternatives brings
together a cross-asset class combination of alpha generation, risk management and efficient beta replication strategies.
These include Global Multi-Strategy, Managed Futures, Risk Premia and Global Commodities; Agriculture; and
Long/Short Equity. Additionally, the management of our direct UK commercial property offering is sub-advised by
Nuveen Real Estate.
AUM by capability as of December 31, 2019, was as follows (in billions):
Closing AUM
By capability
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total
Distribution
Distribution Channels
December 31, 2019
$
204.0
74.8
45.2
39.8
11.0
374.8
$
We distribute our products through three primary channels: intermediary, institutional and self-directed. Each channel is
discussed below.
Intermediary Channel
The intermediary channel distributes mutual funds, separately managed accounts (“SMAs”), exchange-traded funds
(“ETFs”), UK Open Ended Investment Companies (“OEICs”), Société d’Investissement À Capital Variable (“SICAV”)
and Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities (“UCITS”) through financial intermediaries
including banks, broker-dealers, financial advisors, fund platforms and discretionary wealth managers. We have made
significant investments to grow our presence in the financial advisor subchannel, including increasing the number of
external and internal wholesalers, enhancing our technology platform and recruiting highly seasoned client relationship
managers. At December 31, 2019, AUM in our intermediary channel totaled $172.7 billion, or 46% of total AUM.
Institutional Channel
The institutional channel serves corporations, endowments, pension funds, foundations, Taft-Hartley funds, public fund
clients and sovereign entities, with distribution direct to the plan sponsor and through consultants. At
December 31, 2019, AUM in our institutional channel totaled $132.1 billion, or 35% of total AUM.
Self-Directed Channel
The self-directed channel serves existing individual investors who invest in our products through a mutual fund
supermarket or directly with us. At December 31, 2019, AUM in our self-directed channel totaled $70.0 billion, or 19%
of total AUM.
Exchange-traded notes (“ETNs”) associated with the VelocityShares brand are also part of the self-directed channel,
although they are targeted at sophisticated institutional and other investors. VelocityShares ETNs are not included within
AUM as we are not the named adviser or subadviser to ETNs.
While we seek to leverage our global model where possible, we also recognize the importance of tailoring our services
to the needs of clients in different regions. For this reason, we maintain a local presence in most of the markets in which
we operate and provide investment material that takes into account local customs, preferences and language needs. We
have a global distribution team of over 600 client-facing staff.
Our brand proposition centers on the value that the firm offers through active management and the concept of
Knowledge. Shared, which leverages our deep pool of intellectual capital to deliver investment thought leadership and
transparency to clients, thereby building and strengthening trusted relationships.
4
5
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Products and Services
Our global product team maintains oversight of a broad range of products, including locally domiciled pooled funds in
the U.S., the UK, Luxembourg, Ireland, Japan, Singapore and Australia; hedge funds; segregated mandates; and
closed-ended vehicles. The team provides governance for all funds and strategies, and gauges the suitability of new
offerings as well as ensuring that existing products remain suited to the clients to which they are marketed.
Intellectual Property
We have used, registered and/or applied to register certain trademarks, service marks and trade names to distinguish our
sponsored investment products and services from those of our competitors in the jurisdictions in which we operate,
including the U.S., the UK, the European Union (“EU”), Australia, China, Japan and Singapore. These trademarks,
service marks and trade names are important to us and, accordingly, we actively enforce our trademarks, service marks
and trade name rights. Our brand has been, and continues to be, extremely well-received both in the asset management
industry and with clients.
Seasonality
Our revenue streams are not seasonal in nature, with management fees and other income generally accruing evenly
throughout the year. Performance fees are recognized when the prescribed performance hurdles have been achieved and
it is probable that the fee will be earned as a result. The hurdles generally coincide with the year-end of the underlying
funds. Given the uncertain nature of performance fees, they tend to fluctuate from period to period. Interest received
accrues over the year. Investment income, which includes movements in seed capital investments, can fluctuate from
period to period. This fluctuation depends upon how a particular investment performs each month.
Competition
The investment management industry is relatively mature and saturated with competitors that provide services similar to
ours. As such, we encounter significant competition in all areas of our business. We compete with other investment
managers, mutual fund advisers, brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, hedge funds, venture
capitalists, banks and other financial institutions, many of which have proprietary access to certain distribution channels
and are larger, have greater capital resources, and have a broader range of product choices and investment capabilities
than we do. In addition, the marketplace for investment products is rapidly changing, investors are becoming more
sophisticated, the demand for and access to investment advice and information is becoming more widespread, passive
investment strategies are becoming more prevalent, and more investors are demanding investment vehicles that are
customized to their individual requirements.
We believe our ability to successfully compete in the investment management industry depends upon our ability to
achieve consistently strong investment performance, provide exceptional client service and strategic partnerships, and
develop and innovate products that will best serve our clients.
Regulation
The investment management industry is subject to extensive federal, state and international laws and regulations
intended to benefit and protect investment advisory clients and investors in pooled investment vehicles, such as those
managed, advised or subadvised by us. The costs of complying with such laws and regulations have grown significantly
in recent years and may continue to grow in the future, which could significantly increase our costs of doing business as
a global asset manager. These laws and regulations generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers,
including the power to limit or restrict the conduct of businesses and to impose sanctions for failure to comply with laws
and regulations. Possible consequences for failure to comply include voiding of investment advisory and subadvisory
agreements, the suspension of individual employees (particularly investment management and sales personnel),
limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, revocation of registrations,
disgorgement of profits, and imposition of censures and fines. Further, failure to comply with such laws and regulations
may provide the basis for civil litigation that may also result in significant costs and reputational harm to us.
6
Table of Contents Products and Services
U.S. Regulation
Our global product team maintains oversight of a broad range of products, including locally domiciled pooled funds in
the U.S., the UK, Luxembourg, Ireland, Japan, Singapore and Australia; hedge funds; segregated mandates; and
closed-ended vehicles. The team provides governance for all funds and strategies, and gauges the suitability of new
offerings as well as ensuring that existing products remain suited to the clients to which they are marketed.
We have used, registered and/or applied to register certain trademarks, service marks and trade names to distinguish our
sponsored investment products and services from those of our competitors in the jurisdictions in which we operate,
including the U.S., the UK, the European Union (“EU”), Australia, China, Japan and Singapore. These trademarks,
service marks and trade names are important to us and, accordingly, we actively enforce our trademarks, service marks
and trade name rights. Our brand has been, and continues to be, extremely well-received both in the asset management
Intellectual Property
industry and with clients.
Seasonality
Our revenue streams are not seasonal in nature, with management fees and other income generally accruing evenly
throughout the year. Performance fees are recognized when the prescribed performance hurdles have been achieved and
it is probable that the fee will be earned as a result. The hurdles generally coincide with the year-end of the underlying
funds. Given the uncertain nature of performance fees, they tend to fluctuate from period to period. Interest received
accrues over the year. Investment income, which includes movements in seed capital investments, can fluctuate from
period to period. This fluctuation depends upon how a particular investment performs each month.
The investment management industry is relatively mature and saturated with competitors that provide services similar to
ours. As such, we encounter significant competition in all areas of our business. We compete with other investment
managers, mutual fund advisers, brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, hedge funds, venture
capitalists, banks and other financial institutions, many of which have proprietary access to certain distribution channels
and are larger, have greater capital resources, and have a broader range of product choices and investment capabilities
than we do. In addition, the marketplace for investment products is rapidly changing, investors are becoming more
sophisticated, the demand for and access to investment advice and information is becoming more widespread, passive
investment strategies are becoming more prevalent, and more investors are demanding investment vehicles that are
customized to their individual requirements.
We believe our ability to successfully compete in the investment management industry depends upon our ability to
achieve consistently strong investment performance, provide exceptional client service and strategic partnerships, and
develop and innovate products that will best serve our clients.
Competition
Regulation
The investment management industry is subject to extensive federal, state and international laws and regulations
intended to benefit and protect investment advisory clients and investors in pooled investment vehicles, such as those
managed, advised or subadvised by us. The costs of complying with such laws and regulations have grown significantly
in recent years and may continue to grow in the future, which could significantly increase our costs of doing business as
a global asset manager. These laws and regulations generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers,
including the power to limit or restrict the conduct of businesses and to impose sanctions for failure to comply with laws
and regulations. Possible consequences for failure to comply include voiding of investment advisory and subadvisory
agreements, the suspension of individual employees (particularly investment management and sales personnel),
limitations on engaging in certain lines of business for specified periods of time, revocation of registrations,
disgorgement of profits, and imposition of censures and fines. Further, failure to comply with such laws and regulations
may provide the basis for civil litigation that may also result in significant costs and reputational harm to us.
Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries are subject to laws and regulations from a number of government agencies and self-
regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the U.S. Department of Labor
(“DOL”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(“CFTC”) and the National Futures Association (“NFA”). We continue to see enhanced legislative and regulatory
interest in the regulation of financial services in the U.S. through existing and proposed new rules and regulations,
regulatory priorities and general discussions around expanded reporting requirements, and transfer agent regulations. For
example, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) and the DOL’s fiduciary
regulations (as well as state and other fiduciary rules, the SEC’s best interest standards and other similar standards) have
an impact on our global asset management business, and we continually review and analyze the potential impact of these
laws and regulations on our clients, prospective clients and distribution channels.
Investment Advisory Laws and Regulations
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended
(the “Advisers Act”), and are regulated by the SEC. The Advisers Act requires registered investment advisers to comply
with numerous and pervasive obligations, including fiduciary duties, disclosure obligations, recordkeeping requirements,
custodial obligations, operational and marketing restrictions, and registration and reporting requirements. Certain of our
employees are also registered with regulatory authorities in various states, and thus are subject to oversight and
regulation by such states’ regulatory agencies.
Investment Company Laws and Regulations
Certain of our subsidiaries act as adviser or subadviser to mutual funds and ETFs, which are registered with the SEC
pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Certain of our subsidiaries also serve as
adviser or subadviser to investment products that are not required to be registered under the 1940 Act. As an adviser or
subadviser to pooled investment vehicles that operate under exemptions to the 1940 Act and related regulations, we are
subject to various requirements relating to operations, fees charged, sales, accounting, recordkeeping, disclosure and
governance. In addition, the adviser or subadviser to a registered investment company generally has obligations with
respect to the qualification of the registered investment company under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”).
Broker-Dealer Regulations
Our subsidiary Janus Distributors LLC dba Janus Henderson Distributors (“JHD”) is registered with the SEC under the
Exchange Act and is a member of FINRA, the U.S. securities industry’s self-regulatory organization. JHD is a limited-
purpose broker-dealer, which acts as the general distributor and agent for the sale and distribution of shares of U.S.
mutual funds that are sponsored by certain of our subsidiaries, as well as the distribution of certain exchange-traded
products (“ETPs”) and other pooled investment vehicles. The SEC imposes various requirements on JHD’s operations,
including disclosure, recordkeeping and accounting. FINRA has established conduct rules for all securities transactions
among broker-dealers and private investors, trading rules for the over-the-counter markets and operational rules for its
member firms. The SEC and FINRA also impose net capital requirements on registered broker-dealers.
JHD is subject to regulation under state law. The federal securities laws prohibit states from imposing substantive
requirements on broker-dealers that exceed those under federal law. This does not preclude the states from imposing
registration requirements on broker-dealers that operate within their jurisdiction or from sanctioning broker-dealers and
their employees for engaging in misconduct.
ERISA
Certain of our subsidiaries are also subject to ERISA and related regulations to the extent they are considered
“fiduciaries” under ERISA with respect to some of their investment advisory clients. ERISA-related provisions of the
Code and regulations issued by the DOL impose duties on persons who are fiduciaries under ERISA and prohibit some
6
7
Table of Contents Table of Contents transactions involving the assets of each ERISA plan that is a client of a subsidiary of ours as well as some transactions
by the fiduciaries and various other related parties of such plans.
CFTC
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the CFTC as commodity pool operators (“CPOs”) or commodity trading
advisers (“CTAs”), and certain of our subsidiaries have become members of the NFA in connection with the operation of
certain of our products. The Commodity Exchange Act and related regulations generally impose certain registration,
reporting and disclosure requirements on CPOs, CTAs and products that utilize the futures, swaps and other derivatives
that are subject to CFTC regulation. These rules adopted by the CFTC eliminated or limited previously available
exemptions and exclusions from many CFTC requirements and impose additional registration and reporting
requirements for operators of certain registered investment companies and certain other pooled vehicles that use or trade
in futures, swaps and other derivatives that are subject to CFTC regulation. The CFTC or NFA may institute proceedings
to enforce applicable rules and regulations, and violations may result in fines, censure or the termination of CPO and/or
CTA registration and NFA membership.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law in July
2010. The Dodd-Frank Act established enhanced regulatory requirements for non-bank financial institutions designated
as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFI”) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”). In April
2012, the FSOC issued a final rule and interpretive guidance related to the process by which it will designate non-bank
financial companies, potentially including large asset managers, as SIFI. Since that time, the FSOC has considered and
invited comments on the circumstances under which asset managers might present risks to financial stability. While the
FSOC still retains discretion to designate asset managers as SIFI, it has not named any non-bank asset managers as SIFI
to date. If we were designated a SIFI, we would be subject to enhanced prudential measures, which could include capital
and liquidity requirements, leverage limits, enhanced public disclosures and risk management requirements, annual
stress testing by the Federal Reserve, credit exposure and concentration limits, and supervisory and other requirements.
These heightened regulatory requirements could adversely affect our business and operations.
International Regulation
UK
The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) regulates certain of our subsidiaries, as well as products and services we offer
and manage in the UK. The FCA’s powers are derived from the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”)
and FCA authorization is required to conduct any investment management business in the UK under the FCA Handbook.
The FCA’s rules and guidance govern a firm’s capital resources requirements, senior management arrangements,
systems and controls, conduct of business, and interaction with clients and the markets. The FCA also regulates the
design and manufacture of UK-domiciled investment funds intended for public distribution and, on a more limited basis,
those that are for investment by professional investors.
Europe
In addition to the UK regulations discussed above, certain of our UK-regulated entities must comply with a range of EU
regulatory measures. Some of these measures apply directly to our UK entities, while others have been implemented
through member states’ law. These include the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”). MiFID
regulates the provision of investment services and the conduct of investment activities throughout the European
Economic Area. MiFID establishes detailed requirements for the governance, organization and conduct of business of
investment firms and regulated markets. It also includes pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for equity
markets and extensive transaction reporting requirements. These requirements were substantially revised and extended to
non-equities beginning on January 3, 2018, as a result of the implementation of the revised MiFID. The Markets in
Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) has had a substantial impact on the EU’s financial services sector,
including on asset managers. The UK has adopted the MiFID rules into national legislation, principally via the FCA
8
Table of Contents transactions involving the assets of each ERISA plan that is a client of a subsidiary of ours as well as some transactions
by the fiduciaries and various other related parties of such plans.
rules. The other EU member states in which we have a presence have also implemented MiFID in their local legal and
regulatory regimes.
CFTC
Certain of our subsidiaries are registered with the CFTC as commodity pool operators (“CPOs”) or commodity trading
advisers (“CTAs”), and certain of our subsidiaries have become members of the NFA in connection with the operation of
certain of our products. The Commodity Exchange Act and related regulations generally impose certain registration,
reporting and disclosure requirements on CPOs, CTAs and products that utilize the futures, swaps and other derivatives
that are subject to CFTC regulation. These rules adopted by the CFTC eliminated or limited previously available
exemptions and exclusions from many CFTC requirements and impose additional registration and reporting
requirements for operators of certain registered investment companies and certain other pooled vehicles that use or trade
in futures, swaps and other derivatives that are subject to CFTC regulation. The CFTC or NFA may institute proceedings
to enforce applicable rules and regulations, and violations may result in fines, censure or the termination of CPO and/or
CTA registration and NFA membership.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law in July
2010. The Dodd-Frank Act established enhanced regulatory requirements for non-bank financial institutions designated
as systemically important financial institutions (“SIFI”) by the Financial Stability Oversight Council (“FSOC”). In April
2012, the FSOC issued a final rule and interpretive guidance related to the process by which it will designate non-bank
financial companies, potentially including large asset managers, as SIFI. Since that time, the FSOC has considered and
invited comments on the circumstances under which asset managers might present risks to financial stability. While the
FSOC still retains discretion to designate asset managers as SIFI, it has not named any non-bank asset managers as SIFI
to date. If we were designated a SIFI, we would be subject to enhanced prudential measures, which could include capital
and liquidity requirements, leverage limits, enhanced public disclosures and risk management requirements, annual
stress testing by the Federal Reserve, credit exposure and concentration limits, and supervisory and other requirements.
These heightened regulatory requirements could adversely affect our business and operations.
International Regulation
UK
The Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) regulates certain of our subsidiaries, as well as products and services we offer
and manage in the UK. The FCA’s powers are derived from the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (the “FSMA”)
and FCA authorization is required to conduct any investment management business in the UK under the FCA Handbook.
The FCA’s rules and guidance govern a firm’s capital resources requirements, senior management arrangements,
systems and controls, conduct of business, and interaction with clients and the markets. The FCA also regulates the
design and manufacture of UK-domiciled investment funds intended for public distribution and, on a more limited basis,
those that are for investment by professional investors.
Europe
In addition to the UK regulations discussed above, certain of our UK-regulated entities must comply with a range of EU
regulatory measures. Some of these measures apply directly to our UK entities, while others have been implemented
through member states’ law. These include the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”). MiFID
regulates the provision of investment services and the conduct of investment activities throughout the European
Economic Area. MiFID establishes detailed requirements for the governance, organization and conduct of business of
investment firms and regulated markets. It also includes pre- and post-trade transparency requirements for equity
markets and extensive transaction reporting requirements. These requirements were substantially revised and extended to
non-equities beginning on January 3, 2018, as a result of the implementation of the revised MiFID. The Markets in
Financial Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) has had a substantial impact on the EU’s financial services sector,
including on asset managers. The UK has adopted the MiFID rules into national legislation, principally via the FCA
The EU’s Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) was required to be transposed into EU member
state law by July 2013 with a transitional period until July 2014. AIFMD regulates managers of, and service providers
to, alternative investment funds (“AIFs”) that are domiciled and offered in the EU and that are not authorized as retail
funds under the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities Directive. We have two subsidiaries
regulated as Alternative Investment Fund Managers. The AIFMD also regulates the marketing within the EU of all AIFs,
including those domiciled outside the EU. Compliance with the AIFMD’s requirements may restrict AIF marketing and
imposes compliance obligations in the form of remuneration policies, capital requirements, reporting requirements,
leverage oversight, valuation, reporting stakes in EU companies, the domicile, duties and liability of custodians, and
liquidity management.
UCITS are investment funds regulated at the EU level under the UCITS Directive V (“UCITS V”). UCITS are capable
of being freely marketed throughout the EU on the basis of a single authorization in a member state — so-called
passporting. UCITS V covers a range of matters relating to UCITS, including the fund structure and domicile of UCITS,
service providers to UCITS and marketing arrangements. In addition, UCITS funds are distributed in other jurisdictions
outside the EU, notably in South America, where marketing and sales are governed by local country specific regulations.
Luxembourg
In Luxembourg, our subsidiary, Henderson Management S.A. (“HMSA”), is authorized and regulated in Luxembourg by
the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier as a UCITS management company, with additional regulatory
permissions to provide portfolio management services regulated under MiFID II. Two umbrella funds, Janus Henderson
Horizon Fund and Janus Henderson Fund, have appointed HMSA as their management company. Janus Henderson
Horizon Fund and Janus Henderson Fund are UCITS incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg in the form of a
SICAV.
Singapore
In Singapore, our subsidiary is subject to various laws, including the Securities and Futures Act, the Financial Advisers
Act and the subsidiary legislation promulgated pursuant to these acts, which are administered by the Monetary Authority
of Singapore (“MAS”). Our asset management subsidiary and its employees conducting regulated activities specified in
the Securities and Futures Act or the Financial Advisers Act are required to be licensed with the MAS.
Australia
In Australia, our subsidiaries operate under an Australian Financial Services License and their activities are governed
primarily by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and its associated regulations. Their main regulator is the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”), which is Australia’s integrated corporate, markets, financial services
and consumer credit regulator. ASIC imposes certain conditions on licensed financial services organizations that apply
to our subsidiaries, including requirements relating to capital resources, operational capability and controls. Another key
regulator is the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (“AUSTRAC”) which applies a number of reporting
and other obligations under the AML/CFT Act.
As our chess depository interests (“CDIs”) are quoted and traded on the financial market operated by the Australian
Securities Exchange (“ASX”), we are also required to comply with the ASX listing rules and the ASX Corporate
Governance Principles and Recommendations.
Hong Kong
In Hong Kong, our subsidiaries are subject to the Securities and Futures Ordinance (“SFO”) and related legislation,
which govern the securities and futures markets and regulate the offerings of investments to the public. This legislation
is administered by the Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”), which is also empowered under the SFO to establish
8
9
Table of Contents Table of Contents standards for compliance as well as codes and guidelines. Our subsidiaries and their employees conducting any of the
regulated activities specified in the SFO are required to be licensed with the SFC and are subject to the rules, codes and
guidelines issued by the SFC from time to time.
Japan
In Japan, our subsidiary is subject to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Act on Investment Trusts and
Investment Corporations. These laws are administered and enforced by the Japanese Financial Services Agency, which
establishes standards for compliance, including capital adequacy and financial soundness requirements, customer
protection requirements and conduct of business rules.
These regulatory agencies have broad supervisory and disciplinary powers, including, among others, the power to
temporarily or permanently revoke the authorization to conduct regulated business, suspend registered employees, and
censure and fine both regulated businesses and their registered employees.
Other
Our operations in Taiwan and Ireland are regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan and the Central
Bank of Ireland, respectively. One of our subsidiaries also holds a business registration for cross-border discretionary
investment management and investment advisory in South Korea as granted by Korea’s Financial Services Commission.
Many of the non-U.S. securities exchanges and regulatory authorities have imposed rules (and others may impose rules)
relating to capital requirements applicable to our foreign subsidiaries. These rules, which specify minimum capital
requirements, are designed to measure general financial integrity and liquidity, and require that a minimum amount of
assets be kept in relatively liquid form.
Employees
As of December 31, 2019, we had 2,335 full-time-equivalent employees. None of our employees are represented by a
labor union.
Available Information
We make available free of charge our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports
on Form 8-K and any amendments thereto as soon as reasonably practical after such filings are made with the SEC.
These reports may be obtained through our Investor Relations website (http://janushenderson.com/ir). The contents of
our website are not incorporated herein for any purpose. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
Charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Risk Committee, and Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee of our Board of Directors, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business
Conduct, and our Officer Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (our “Senior
Officer Code”) are posted on the Investor Relations website (http://janushenderson.com/ir) and are available in print
upon request by any shareholder. Within the time period prescribed by SEC and New York Stock Exchange regulations,
we will post on our website any amendment to our Senior Officer Code and our Code of Business Conduct or any
waivers thereof. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.
Corporate Information
We are a public limited company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and tax resident in the UK. Our registered
address in Jersey, Channel Islands is 47 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE1 0BD. Our principal business address is 201
Bishopsgate, London, EC2M 3AE, United Kingdom, and our telephone number is +44 (0)20 7818 1818.
10
Table of Contents Japan
Other
These regulatory agencies have broad supervisory and disciplinary powers, including, among others, the power to
temporarily or permanently revoke the authorization to conduct regulated business, suspend registered employees, and
censure and fine both regulated businesses and their registered employees.
Our operations in Taiwan and Ireland are regulated by the Financial Supervisory Commission of Taiwan and the Central
Bank of Ireland, respectively. One of our subsidiaries also holds a business registration for cross-border discretionary
investment management and investment advisory in South Korea as granted by Korea’s Financial Services Commission.
Many of the non-U.S. securities exchanges and regulatory authorities have imposed rules (and others may impose rules)
relating to capital requirements applicable to our foreign subsidiaries. These rules, which specify minimum capital
requirements, are designed to measure general financial integrity and liquidity, and require that a minimum amount of
assets be kept in relatively liquid form.
As of December 31, 2019, we had 2,335 full-time-equivalent employees. None of our employees are represented by a
Employees
labor union.
Available Information
We make available free of charge our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports
on Form 8-K and any amendments thereto as soon as reasonably practical after such filings are made with the SEC.
These reports may be obtained through our Investor Relations website (http://janushenderson.com/ir). The contents of
our website are not incorporated herein for any purpose. The SEC also maintains an internet site that contains reports,
proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
Charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Risk Committee, and Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee of our Board of Directors, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business
Conduct, and our Officer Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers (our “Senior
Officer Code”) are posted on the Investor Relations website (http://janushenderson.com/ir) and are available in print
upon request by any shareholder. Within the time period prescribed by SEC and New York Stock Exchange regulations,
we will post on our website any amendment to our Senior Officer Code and our Code of Business Conduct or any
waivers thereof. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this report.
Corporate Information
We are a public limited company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and tax resident in the UK. Our registered
address in Jersey, Channel Islands is 47 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey JE1 0BD. Our principal business address is 201
Bishopsgate, London, EC2M 3AE, United Kingdom, and our telephone number is +44 (0)20 7818 1818.
standards for compliance as well as codes and guidelines. Our subsidiaries and their employees conducting any of the
regulated activities specified in the SFO are required to be licensed with the SFC and are subject to the rules, codes and
guidelines issued by the SFC from time to time.
We are a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act and in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act. As a result, we are eligible to file our annual reports pursuant to Section 13 of the
Exchange Act on Form 20-F (in lieu of Form 10-K) and to file our interim reports on Form 6-K (in lieu of Forms 10-Q
and 8-K). However, we have elected to file our annual, interim and current reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K,
including any instructions therein that relate specifically to foreign private issuers.
In Japan, our subsidiary is subject to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Act on Investment Trusts and
Investment Corporations. These laws are administered and enforced by the Japanese Financial Services Agency, which
establishes standards for compliance, including capital adequacy and financial soundness requirements, customer
protection requirements and conduct of business rules.
Pursuant to Rule 3a12-3 under the Exchange Act regarding foreign private issuers, our proxy solicitations are not subject
to the disclosure and procedural requirements of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and transactions in our equity
securities by our officers, directors and significant shareholders are exempt from the reporting and liability provisions of
Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves various risks, including those mentioned below and those that are
discussed from time to time in our periodic filings with the SEC. Investors should carefully consider these risks, along
with the other information contained in this report, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock.
There may be additional risks of which we are currently unaware, or which we currently consider immaterial. Any of
these risks could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and value of our
common stock.
Market and Investment Performance Risks
Our results of operations and financial condition are primarily dependent on the value, composition and relative
investment performance of our AUM, all of which are subject to fluctuation caused by factors outside of our control.
We derive our revenues primarily from investment management and related services we provide to institutional and
retail investors worldwide through our investment products. Our investment management fees typically are calculated as
a percentage of the market value of our AUM. Certain of our investment products are also subject to performance fees,
which vary based on a product’s relative performance as compared to a benchmark index. As a result, our revenues are
dependent on the value, composition and investment performance of our AUM, all of which are subject to fluctuation
caused by factors outside of our control.
Factors that could cause our AUM and revenue to decline include the following:
● Declines in equity markets. Our AUM are concentrated in the U.S. and European equity markets. Equity
securities may decline in value as a result of many factors, including an issuer’s actual or perceived financial
condition and growth prospects, investor perception of an industry or sector, changes in currency exchange
rates, changes in regulations, and geopolitical and economic risks. Declines in the equity markets, or in the
market segments in which our investment products are concentrated, may cause our AUM to decrease.
● Declines in fixed income markets. Fixed income investment products may decline in value as a result of many
factors, principally increases in interest rates, changes in currency exchange rates, changes in relative yield
among instruments with different maturities, geopolitical and general economic risks, available liquidity in the
markets in which a security trades, an issuer’s actual or perceived creditworthiness, or an issuer’s ability to
meet its obligations. Declines in the fixed income markets, or in the market segments in which our investment
products are concentrated, may cause our AUM to decrease.
● Relative investment performance. Our investment products are often judged on their performance as compared
to benchmark indices or peer groups, and are also judged on an absolute return basis. Any period of
underperformance by our investment products relative to peers may result in the loss of existing assets and
affect our ability to attract new assets. In addition, as of December 31, 2019, approximately 17% of our AUM
was subject to performance fees. Performance fees on our investment products are based either on investment
performance as compared to an established benchmark index or on positive absolute return over a specified
period of time. Further, certain of our U.S. mutual fund contracts representing approximately 13% of our AUM
10
11
Table of Contents Table of Contents
at December 31, 2019, are subject to fulcrum performance fees, which can be negative as well as positive. If
our investment products that are subject to performance fees underperform their respective benchmark indices
or produce a negative absolute return for a defined period, our revenue and thus our results of operations and
financial condition may be adversely affected. In addition, performance fees subject our revenue to increased
volatility.
Our revenue and profitability would be adversely affected by any reduction in our AUM as a result of redemptions
and other withdrawals from the funds and accounts we manage.
Investors may reduce their investments in the funds and accounts we manage, or reduce their investments generally, for
many reasons, including:
●
in response to adverse market conditions;
●
to pursue other investment opportunities;
●
to reallocate investments to lower-fee strategies;
●
to take profits from their investments;
●
as a result of poor investment performance of the funds and accounts we manage;
●
as a consequence of damage to our reputation; or
● due to portfolio risk characteristics, which could cause investors to move assets to other investment managers.
Poor performance of our investment products relative to competing products provided by other investment management
firms tends to result in decreased sales, increased redemptions and reductions in our AUM, with corresponding decreases
in revenue. Failure of our funds and accounts to perform well could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in the value of our seeded investment products could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.
We have a significant seed portfolio. Periodically, we add new investment strategies to our investment product offering
and provide the initial cash investment or “seeding” to facilitate the launch of the new product. We may also provide
substantial supplemental capital to an existing investment product to accelerate the growth of a strategy and attract
outside investment in the product. A decline in the valuation of these seeded investments could negatively impact our
earnings and financial condition.
Volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets, and adverse changes in the global economy, may
significantly affect our results of operations and may put pressure on our financial results.
The capital and credit markets may, from time to time, experience volatility and disruption worldwide. Declines in
global financial market conditions have in the past resulted in significant decreases in our AUM, revenues and income,
and future declines may further negatively impact our financial results. Such declines have had, and may in the future
have, an adverse impact on our results of operations. We may need to modify our business, strategies or operations, and
we may be subject to additional constraints or costs in order to compete in a changing global economy and business
environment.
12
Table of Contents
at December 31, 2019, are subject to fulcrum performance fees, which can be negative as well as positive. If
our investment products that are subject to performance fees underperform their respective benchmark indices
or produce a negative absolute return for a defined period, our revenue and thus our results of operations and
financial condition may be adversely affected. In addition, performance fees subject our revenue to increased
volatility.
Our revenue and profitability would be adversely affected by any reduction in our AUM as a result of redemptions
and other withdrawals from the funds and accounts we manage.
Investors may reduce their investments in the funds and accounts we manage, or reduce their investments generally, for
many reasons, including:
●
in response to adverse market conditions;
●
to pursue other investment opportunities;
●
to reallocate investments to lower-fee strategies;
●
to take profits from their investments;
●
as a result of poor investment performance of the funds and accounts we manage;
●
as a consequence of damage to our reputation; or
● due to portfolio risk characteristics, which could cause investors to move assets to other investment managers.
Poor performance of our investment products relative to competing products provided by other investment management
firms tends to result in decreased sales, increased redemptions and reductions in our AUM, with corresponding decreases
in revenue. Failure of our funds and accounts to perform well could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in the value of our seeded investment products could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition.
We have a significant seed portfolio. Periodically, we add new investment strategies to our investment product offering
and provide the initial cash investment or “seeding” to facilitate the launch of the new product. We may also provide
substantial supplemental capital to an existing investment product to accelerate the growth of a strategy and attract
outside investment in the product. A decline in the valuation of these seeded investments could negatively impact our
earnings and financial condition.
Volatility and disruption of the capital and credit markets, and adverse changes in the global economy, may
significantly affect our results of operations and may put pressure on our financial results.
The capital and credit markets may, from time to time, experience volatility and disruption worldwide. Declines in
global financial market conditions have in the past resulted in significant decreases in our AUM, revenues and income,
and future declines may further negatively impact our financial results. Such declines have had, and may in the future
have, an adverse impact on our results of operations. We may need to modify our business, strategies or operations, and
we may be subject to additional constraints or costs in order to compete in a changing global economy and business
environment.
Disruptions in the markets, market participants and to the operations of third parties whose functions are integral to
our ETN and ETF platforms, collectively referred to as ETPs, may adversely affect the prices at which ETPs trade,
particularly during periods of market volatility.
The trading price of an ETP’s shares or units fluctuates continuously throughout trading hours. While an ETP’s
creation/redemption feature and the arbitrage mechanism are designed to make it more likely that the ETP’s shares or
units normally will trade at prices close to the ETP’s net asset value (“NAV”), exchange prices may deviate significantly
from the NAV. ETP market prices are subject to numerous potential risks, including significant market volatility,
imbalances in supply and demand, trading halts invoked by a stock exchange, the inability or unwillingness of market
markers, authorized participants, or settlement systems or other market participants to perform functions necessary for an
ETP’s arbitrage mechanism to function effectively. If market events lead to instances where an ETP trades at prices that
deviate significantly from the ETP’s NAV or indicative value, or trading halts are invoked by the relevant stock
exchange or market, investors may lose confidence in ETP products and sell their holdings, which may cause the AUM
of ETFs, the principal amount outstanding of ETNs, revenue and earnings to decline.
Illiquidity in certain securities in which we invest may negatively impact the financial condition of our investment
products and may impede our ability to effect redemptions.
Some of our funds or mandates invest in certain securities or other assets in which the secondary trading market is
illiquid or in which there is no secondary trading market at all. Illiquidity may occur with respect to the securities of a
specific issuer, of issuers within a specific industry or sector, of issuers within a specific geographic region or regions,
with respect to an asset class or an investment type, or with respect to the market as a whole. An illiquid trading market
may increase market volatility and may make it impossible for funds or mandates to sell investments promptly without
suffering a loss. This may have an adverse impact on the investment performance of such funds and mandates and on our
AUM, revenues and results of operations.
Investors in certain funds we manage have contractual terms that provide for a shorter notice period for redemptions or
withdrawals than the time period during which these funds may be able to sell underlying investments within the fund.
This liquidity mismatch may be exacerbated during periods of market illiquidity and, in circumstances in which there are
high levels of investor redemptions, it may be necessary for us to impose restrictions on redeeming investors or suspend
redemptions. Such actions could increase the risk of legal claims by investors and regulatory investigations and/or fines
and may adversely affect our reputation.
We could be adversely impacted by changes in assumptions used to calculate pension assets and liabilities.
We provide retirement benefits for our current and former employees in the UK through the Janus Henderson Group
Pension Scheme (the “UK Pension Scheme”). The UK Pension Scheme operates a number of defined benefit sections,
which closed to new entrants on November 15, 1999, and a money purchase section. As of December 31, 2017, the UK
Pension Scheme had a surplus of £12.0 million on a technical provision basis. We may be required to increase our
contributions in the future to cover any increased funding shortfall and/or expenses in the UK Pension Scheme, which
could adversely impact our results and financial condition.
In addition the following issues could adversely affect the funding of the defined benefits under the UK Pension Scheme
and materially affect our funding obligations: (i) poorer than anticipated investment performance of pension fund
investments; (ii) the trustees of the UK Pension Scheme switching investment strategy to one with a lower weighting of
return seeking assets; (iii) changes in the corporate bond yields which are used in the measurement of the UK Pension
Scheme’s liabilities; (iv) longer life expectancy (which will make pensions payable for longer and therefore more
expensive to provide, whether paid directly from the UK Pension Scheme or secured by the purchase of annuities); (v)
adverse annuity rates (which tend, in particular, to depend on prevailing interest rates and life expectancy), as these will
make it more expensive to secure pensions with an insurance company; (vi) a change in the actuarial assumptions by
reference to which our contributions are assessed, for example, changes to assumptions for long-term price inflation;
(vii) any increase in the risk-based levy assessed by and payable to the Pension Protection Fund by the UK Pension
Scheme; (viii) other events occurring that make past service benefits more expensive than predicted in the actuarial
assumptions by reference to which our past contributions were assessed; (ix) changes to the regulatory regime for
12
13
Table of Contents Table of Contents
funding defined benefit pension schemes in the UK; and (x) the UK Pensions Regulator exercising its power to trigger a
winding up of the UK Pension Scheme, thereby making us liable for any deficit in the UK Pension Scheme’s funding
(although, in practice, it is assumed that the Pensions Regulator would be unlikely to exercise these powers while we
continue to fund the UK Pension Scheme appropriately).
The global scope of our business subjects us to currency exchange rate risk that may adversely impact revenue and
income.
We generate a substantial portion of our revenue in pounds sterling, euro and Australian dollars. As a result, we are
subject to foreign currency exchange risk relative to the U.S. dollar (“USD”), our financial reporting currency, through
our non-U.S. operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rates to the USD may affect our financial results from one period
to the next. In addition, there is risk associated with the foreign exchange revaluation of balances held by certain of our
subsidiaries for which the local currency is different from our functional currency.
We could be impacted by counterparty or client defaults.
In periods of significant market volatility, the deteriorating financial condition of one financial institution may materially
and adversely impact the performance of others. We, and the funds and accounts we manage, have exposure to many
different counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties across the financial industry. As a result,
we and our managed funds and accounts, may be exposed to credit, operational or other risk in the event of a default by a
counterparty or client, or in the event of other unrelated systemic market failures.
Business and Strategic Risks
We may fail to successfully implement a strategy for the combined business, which could negatively impact our AUM,
results of operations and financial condition.
Through the combination of JCG and Henderson, we intended to establish an independent, active asset manager with a
globally relevant brand, footprint, investment proposition and client service. No assurance can be given that we will
successfully achieve this objective or that our achievement of this objective will lead to increased revenue and net
income, or to the creation of shareholder value. The failure to successfully implement a strategy for JHG could adversely
affect our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in a highly competitive environment, and revenue from fees may be reduced.
The investment management business is highly competitive. In recent years, established firms and new entrants to the
asset management industry have expanded their application of technology, including the use of robo advisers, to provide
services to clients. Our traditional fee structures may be subject to downward pressure due to these factors. Moreover, in
recent years there has been a trend toward lower fees in the investment management industry, as evidenced by the
movement toward passively managed mutual funds and the growth of lower cost funds such as exchange traded, smart
beta and quantitative funds. Fees for actively managed investment products may continue to come under increased
pressure if such products fail to outperform returns for comparable passively managed products or as a consequence of
regulatory intervention. Fee reductions on existing or future new business, as well as changes in regulations pertaining to
fees, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, we compete with investment
management companies on the basis of investment performance, fees, diversity of products, distribution capability,
scope and quality of services, reputation and the ability to develop new investment products to meet the changing needs
of investors. Failure to adequately compete could adversely affect our AUM, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our success depends on our key personnel, and our financial performance could be negatively affected by the loss of
their services.
The success of our business is highly dependent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and often
highly specialized technical, executive, sales and investment management personnel. The market for qualified
14
Table of Contents funding defined benefit pension schemes in the UK; and (x) the UK Pensions Regulator exercising its power to trigger a
winding up of the UK Pension Scheme, thereby making us liable for any deficit in the UK Pension Scheme’s funding
(although, in practice, it is assumed that the Pensions Regulator would be unlikely to exercise these powers while we
continue to fund the UK Pension Scheme appropriately).
The global scope of our business subjects us to currency exchange rate risk that may adversely impact revenue and
income.
We generate a substantial portion of our revenue in pounds sterling, euro and Australian dollars. As a result, we are
subject to foreign currency exchange risk relative to the U.S. dollar (“USD”), our financial reporting currency, through
our non-U.S. operations. Fluctuations in the exchange rates to the USD may affect our financial results from one period
to the next. In addition, there is risk associated with the foreign exchange revaluation of balances held by certain of our
subsidiaries for which the local currency is different from our functional currency.
We could be impacted by counterparty or client defaults.
In periods of significant market volatility, the deteriorating financial condition of one financial institution may materially
and adversely impact the performance of others. We, and the funds and accounts we manage, have exposure to many
different counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties across the financial industry. As a result,
we and our managed funds and accounts, may be exposed to credit, operational or other risk in the event of a default by a
counterparty or client, or in the event of other unrelated systemic market failures.
Business and Strategic Risks
We may fail to successfully implement a strategy for the combined business, which could negatively impact our AUM,
results of operations and financial condition.
Through the combination of JCG and Henderson, we intended to establish an independent, active asset manager with a
globally relevant brand, footprint, investment proposition and client service. No assurance can be given that we will
successfully achieve this objective or that our achievement of this objective will lead to increased revenue and net
income, or to the creation of shareholder value. The failure to successfully implement a strategy for JHG could adversely
affect our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in a highly competitive environment, and revenue from fees may be reduced.
The investment management business is highly competitive. In recent years, established firms and new entrants to the
asset management industry have expanded their application of technology, including the use of robo advisers, to provide
services to clients. Our traditional fee structures may be subject to downward pressure due to these factors. Moreover, in
recent years there has been a trend toward lower fees in the investment management industry, as evidenced by the
movement toward passively managed mutual funds and the growth of lower cost funds such as exchange traded, smart
beta and quantitative funds. Fees for actively managed investment products may continue to come under increased
pressure if such products fail to outperform returns for comparable passively managed products or as a consequence of
regulatory intervention. Fee reductions on existing or future new business, as well as changes in regulations pertaining to
fees, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, we compete with investment
management companies on the basis of investment performance, fees, diversity of products, distribution capability,
scope and quality of services, reputation and the ability to develop new investment products to meet the changing needs
of investors. Failure to adequately compete could adversely affect our AUM, results of operations and financial
Our success depends on our key personnel, and our financial performance could be negatively affected by the loss of
condition.
their services.
The success of our business is highly dependent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and often
highly specialized technical, executive, sales and investment management personnel. The market for qualified
investment and sales professionals is extremely competitive and is characterized by the frequent movement of portfolio
managers, analysts and salespeople among different firms. Any changes to management structure, shifts in corporate
culture, changes to corporate governance authority, or adjustments or reductions to compensation could affect our ability
to retain key personnel and could result in legal claims. In order to retain certain key personnel, we may be required to
increase compensation to such individuals, resulting in additional expense. Existing and newly enacted or adopted laws
and regulations could impose restrictions on compensation paid by financial institutions, which could restrict our ability
to compete effectively for qualified professionals. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in finding,
attracting and retaining qualified individuals, and the departure of key personnel, particularly those personnel
responsible for managing client funds that account for a high proportion of our revenue, could cause us to lose clients,
which could have a material adverse effect on our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
We are dependent upon third-party distribution channels to access clients and potential clients.
Our ability to market and distribute our investment products is significantly dependent on access to the client base of
insurance companies, defined contribution plan administrators, securities firms, broker dealers, financial advisors, multi-
managers, banks and other distribution channels. These companies generally offer their clients various investment
products in addition to, and competitive with, products offered by us. In addition, our existing relationships with third
party distributors and access to new distributors could be adversely affected by recent consolidation within the financial
services industry. Consolidation may result in increased distribution costs, a reduction in the number of third parties
distributing our investment products or increased competition to access third-party distribution channels. Moreover,
fiduciary regulations have led to significant shifts in distributors’ business models and more limited product offerings,
and additional regulations could lead to further changes, potentially resulting in reduced distribution of certain of our
products. Our inability to access clients through third-party distribution channels could adversely affect our business
prospects, AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
The global scope of our business subjects us to market-specific political, economic and other risks that may adversely
impact our revenue and income generated overseas.
Our global portfolios and revenue derived from managing these portfolios are subject to significant risks of loss as a
result of political, economic and diplomatic developments; currency fluctuations; social instability; changes in
governmental policies; regulation and enforcement; expropriation; nationalization; asset confiscation; and changes in
legislation related to non-U.S. ownership.
Individual financial, equity, debt and commodity markets may be adversely affected by financial, economic, political,
electoral, diplomatic or other instabilities that are particular to the country or region in which a market is located,
including local acts of terrorism, political protests, insurrection or other economic, business, social or political crises.
Global economic conditions also affect the mix, market values and levels of our AUM and are difficult to predict as they
can be exacerbated by war, terrorism, natural disasters or financial crises; changes in the equity, debt or commodity
marketplaces; changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rates and the yield curve; defaults by trading
counterparties; bond defaults; revaluation and bond market liquidity risks; geopolitical risks; the imposition of economic
sanctions; the outbreak of pandemics such as the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”); and other factors. Political events in
any country or region could result in significant declines in equity and/or fixed income securities with exposure to such a
country or region and, to the extent that we have a concentration of AUM in such a country or region, could result in a
material adverse effect on our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
14
15
Table of Contents Table of Contents In addition, international trading markets, particularly in some emerging market countries, are often smaller, less liquid,
less regulated and significantly more volatile than those in the U.S. Local regulatory environments may vary widely in
terms of scope, adequacy and sophistication. Moreover, regulators in non-U.S. jurisdictions could change their policies
or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to distribute or authorize products or maintain our
authorizations in their respective markets. Similarly, local distributors, and their policies and practices as well as
financial viability, may also vary widely, or be inconsistent or less developed or mature than other more internationally
focused distributors. As our business grows in non-U.S. markets, any ongoing and future business, political, economic or
social unrest affecting these markets may have a negative impact on the long-term investment climate in these and other
areas, and, as a result, our AUM and the revenue and income we generate from these markets may be negatively
affected.
Our reputation is critical to the success of our business. Harm to our reputation or poor investment performance of
our products could reduce our AUM and affect sales, which could adversely affect our revenue and net income.
We believe that our brand name is well-received both in the asset management industry and with our clients, reflecting
the fact that our brand, like our business, is based in part on trust and confidence. If our reputation is harmed, existing
clients may reduce their investments in, or withdraw entirely from, funds we manage, or funds may terminate or reduce
AUM under their management agreements with us, which could reduce the amount of our AUM and cause us to suffer a
corresponding loss in revenue and income. Our investment performance, along with achieving and maintaining superior
distribution and client services, is also critical to the success of our business. Strong investment performance has
historically stimulated sales of our investment products. Poor investment performance as compared to third-party
benchmarks or competitive products has in the past, and could in the future, lead to a decrease in sales of investment
products we manage and stimulate redemptions from existing products, generally lowering the overall level of our AUM
and reducing our management fees, and may have an adverse effect on our revenue and net income. No assurance can be
given that past or present investment performance in the investment products we manage is indicative of future
performance.
Our reputation could also be damaged by factors such as:
●
litigation;
●
regulatory action;
●
loss of key personnel;
● operational failures;
●
fraud, misconduct or mismanagement, theft, loss or misuse of client data by our personnel or third parties;
●
failure to manage conflicts of interest or satisfy fiduciary responsibilities; and
● negative publicity or press speculation (whether or not any such allegations or claims are valid or ultimately
disproved, dismissed or withdrawn).
Reputational harm or poor investment performance may cause us to lose current clients and we may be unable to
continue to attract new clients or develop new business. If we fail to address, or appear to fail to address, successfully
and promptly the underlying causes of any reputational harm or poor investment performance, we may be unsuccessful
in repairing any existing harm to its reputation or performance, and the Group’s future business prospects would likely
be affected.
16
Table of Contents
In addition, international trading markets, particularly in some emerging market countries, are often smaller, less liquid,
less regulated and significantly more volatile than those in the U.S. Local regulatory environments may vary widely in
terms of scope, adequacy and sophistication. Moreover, regulators in non-U.S. jurisdictions could change their policies
or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede our ability to distribute or authorize products or maintain our
authorizations in their respective markets. Similarly, local distributors, and their policies and practices as well as
financial viability, may also vary widely, or be inconsistent or less developed or mature than other more internationally
focused distributors. As our business grows in non-U.S. markets, any ongoing and future business, political, economic or
social unrest affecting these markets may have a negative impact on the long-term investment climate in these and other
areas, and, as a result, our AUM and the revenue and income we generate from these markets may be negatively
affected.
Our reputation is critical to the success of our business. Harm to our reputation or poor investment performance of
our products could reduce our AUM and affect sales, which could adversely affect our revenue and net income.
We believe that our brand name is well-received both in the asset management industry and with our clients, reflecting
the fact that our brand, like our business, is based in part on trust and confidence. If our reputation is harmed, existing
clients may reduce their investments in, or withdraw entirely from, funds we manage, or funds may terminate or reduce
AUM under their management agreements with us, which could reduce the amount of our AUM and cause us to suffer a
corresponding loss in revenue and income. Our investment performance, along with achieving and maintaining superior
distribution and client services, is also critical to the success of our business. Strong investment performance has
historically stimulated sales of our investment products. Poor investment performance as compared to third-party
benchmarks or competitive products has in the past, and could in the future, lead to a decrease in sales of investment
products we manage and stimulate redemptions from existing products, generally lowering the overall level of our AUM
and reducing our management fees, and may have an adverse effect on our revenue and net income. No assurance can be
given that past or present investment performance in the investment products we manage is indicative of future
performance.
Our reputation could also be damaged by factors such as:
●
litigation;
●
regulatory action;
●
loss of key personnel;
● operational failures;
●
fraud, misconduct or mismanagement, theft, loss or misuse of client data by our personnel or third parties;
●
failure to manage conflicts of interest or satisfy fiduciary responsibilities; and
● negative publicity or press speculation (whether or not any such allegations or claims are valid or ultimately
disproved, dismissed or withdrawn).
Reputational harm or poor investment performance may cause us to lose current clients and we may be unable to
continue to attract new clients or develop new business. If we fail to address, or appear to fail to address, successfully
and promptly the underlying causes of any reputational harm or poor investment performance, we may be unsuccessful
in repairing any existing harm to its reputation or performance, and the Group’s future business prospects would likely
be affected.
The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets on our balance sheet could become impaired, which would
adversely affect our results of operations.
At December 31, 2019, our goodwill and intangible assets totaled $4,592.9 million. The value of these assets may not be
realized for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, significant redemptions, loss of clients, damage to brand
name and unfavorable economic conditions. We have recorded goodwill and intangible asset impairments in the past and
could incur similar charges in the future. Under accounting pronouncements generally accepted in the United States of
America (“U.S. GAAP”), goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are tested for
impairment annually or more often if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been
incurred. Other intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives
and reviewed for impairment whenever there is an indication of impairment. Should such reviews indicate impairment, a
reduction of the carrying value of the intangible asset could occur, resulting in a charge that may, in turn, adversely
affect our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business depends on investment management agreements that are subject to termination, non-renewal or
reductions in fees.
We derive revenue from investment management agreements with investment funds, institutional investors and other
investors. With respect to investment management agreements with U.S. mutual funds, these agreements may be
terminated by either party with notice, or in the event of an “assignment” (as defined in the Investment Company Act)
and must be approved and renewed annually by the independent members of each fund’s board of directors or trustees or
its shareholders, as required by law. In addition, the board of directors or trustees of certain investment funds and
institutional and other investors generally may terminate their investment management agreements upon written notice
for any reason and without penalty. U.S. mutual funds, investment funds or other investors may choose to exercise such
termination rights at any time. In addition, the annual review of U.S. mutual funds investment management agreements,
as required by law, could result in a reduction in our advisory fee revenues. The termination of or failure to renew one or
more of these agreements could have a material adverse effect on our AUM, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our expenses are subject to fluctuations that could materially affect our operating results.
Our results of operations are dependent on our level of expenses, which can vary significantly for many reasons,
including:
●
changes in the level and scope of our operating expenses in response to market conditions or regulations;
● variations in the level of total compensation expense due to, among other things, changes in bonuses, stock-
based awards, changes in employee benefit costs due to regulatory or plan design changes, changes in our
employee count and mix, competitive factors, market performance and inflation;
●
expenses incurred to support distribution of our investment strategies and services;
●
expenses incurred to develop new strategies and services;
●
expenses incurred to enhance our technology, compliance and other infrastructure;
●
impairments of intangible assets or goodwill; and
●
the impact of inflation.
Increases in the level of our expenses, or our inability to reduce the level of expenses when necessary, could materially
affect our operating results.
16
17
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Failure to properly address conflicts of interest could harm our reputation, business and results of operations.
As part of our business we are required to continuously manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including
situations where our services to a particular client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another
client or those of JHG or our employees. The willingness of clients to enter into transactions in which such a conflict
might arise may be affected if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest. In addition,
failure to appropriately manage potential or perceived conflicts or the crystallization of a conflict of interest could give
rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.
Operational and Technology Risks
We could be subject to losses and reputational harm if we, or our agents, fail to properly safeguard sensitive and
confidential information or as a result of cyberattacks.
We depend on the continued effectiveness of our information and cybersecurity policies, procedures and capabilities to
protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that resides in or is transmitted through such
systems.
As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit confidential information about our clients and employees as
well as proprietary information relating to our business operations. We maintain a system of internal controls designed to
provide reasonable assurance that fraudulent activity, including misappropriation of assets, fraudulent financial reporting
and unauthorized access to sensitive or confidential data, is either prevented or detected on a timely basis. Nevertheless,
all technology systems remain vulnerable to unauthorized access and may be corrupted by cyberattacks, computer
viruses or other malicious software code, the nature of which threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly
sophisticated. In addition, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary
information. Although we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our mobile electronic hardware, if such
hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, we may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use,
creating a possible security risk. Any breach or other failure of our technology systems, including those of third parties
with which we do business, or any failure to timely and effectively identify and respond to a breach or failure, could
result in the loss of valuable information, liability for stolen assets or information, remediation costs to repair damage
caused by the incident, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and litigation costs resulting from the
incident. Our use of mobile and cloud technologies could heighten these and other operational risks, and any failure by
mobile technology and cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems to prevent cyberattacks could
disrupt our operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential or proprietary information.
Moreover, loss of confidential customer identification information could harm our reputation, result in the termination of
contracts by our existing customers and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting
in increased costs or loss of revenue.
The increasing prevalence and sophistication of cyberattacks generally and the heightened profile of JHG as a result of
our increased scale and breadth of our global activities may result in an increase in the volume and sophistication of
cyberattacks on us specifically. This may increase the investment required to minimize the risk of harm to our business
and potentially increase the risk that, despite such investment, we will be a victim of a successful cyberattack. Recent
well-publicized security breaches at other companies have exposed failings by companies to keep pace with the threats
posed by cyberattackers and have led to increased government and regulatory scrutiny of the measures taken by
companies to protect against cyberattacks. This may result in future heightened cyber-security requirements, including
additional regulatory expectations for oversight of vendors and service providers, which could lead to increased costs or
fines or public censure, which could lead to a damaged reputation and loss of customers (and a decrease in AUM, lower
revenue and reduced net income) as a result.
18
Table of Contents Failure to properly address conflicts of interest could harm our reputation, business and results of operations.
As part of our business we are required to continuously manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including
situations where our services to a particular client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another
client or those of JHG or our employees. The willingness of clients to enter into transactions in which such a conflict
might arise may be affected if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest. In addition,
failure to appropriately manage potential or perceived conflicts or the crystallization of a conflict of interest could give
rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.
Operational and Technology Risks
We could be subject to losses and reputational harm if we, or our agents, fail to properly safeguard sensitive and
confidential information or as a result of cyberattacks.
We depend on the continued effectiveness of our information and cybersecurity policies, procedures and capabilities to
protect our computer and telecommunications systems and the data that resides in or is transmitted through such
systems.
As part of our normal operations, we maintain and transmit confidential information about our clients and employees as
well as proprietary information relating to our business operations. We maintain a system of internal controls designed to
provide reasonable assurance that fraudulent activity, including misappropriation of assets, fraudulent financial reporting
and unauthorized access to sensitive or confidential data, is either prevented or detected on a timely basis. Nevertheless,
all technology systems remain vulnerable to unauthorized access and may be corrupted by cyberattacks, computer
viruses or other malicious software code, the nature of which threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly
sophisticated. In addition, authorized persons could inadvertently or intentionally release confidential or proprietary
information. Although we take precautions to password protect and encrypt our mobile electronic hardware, if such
hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, we may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use,
creating a possible security risk. Any breach or other failure of our technology systems, including those of third parties
with which we do business, or any failure to timely and effectively identify and respond to a breach or failure, could
result in the loss of valuable information, liability for stolen assets or information, remediation costs to repair damage
caused by the incident, additional security costs to mitigate against future incidents and litigation costs resulting from the
incident. Our use of mobile and cloud technologies could heighten these and other operational risks, and any failure by
mobile technology and cloud service providers to adequately safeguard their systems to prevent cyberattacks could
disrupt our operations and result in misappropriation, corruption or loss of confidential or proprietary information.
Moreover, loss of confidential customer identification information could harm our reputation, result in the termination of
contracts by our existing customers and subject us to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting
in increased costs or loss of revenue.
The increasing prevalence and sophistication of cyberattacks generally and the heightened profile of JHG as a result of
our increased scale and breadth of our global activities may result in an increase in the volume and sophistication of
cyberattacks on us specifically. This may increase the investment required to minimize the risk of harm to our business
and potentially increase the risk that, despite such investment, we will be a victim of a successful cyberattack. Recent
well-publicized security breaches at other companies have exposed failings by companies to keep pace with the threats
posed by cyberattackers and have led to increased government and regulatory scrutiny of the measures taken by
companies to protect against cyberattacks. This may result in future heightened cyber-security requirements, including
additional regulatory expectations for oversight of vendors and service providers, which could lead to increased costs or
fines or public censure, which could lead to a damaged reputation and loss of customers (and a decrease in AUM, lower
revenue and reduced net income) as a result.
Due to our interconnectivity with third-party vendors, advisors, central agents, exchanges, clearing organizations and
other financial institutions, we may be adversely affected if any of them are subject to a successful cyberattack or other
information security event, including those arising from the use of mobile technology or a third-party cloud
environment. Certain software applications that we use in our business are licensed by, and supported, upgraded and
maintained by, third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support,
upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption that could adversely impact our
business. Also, such third-party applications may include confidential and proprietary data provided by vendors and by
us. We may be subject to indemnification costs and liability to third parties if we breach any confidentiality obligations
regarding vendor data, for losses related to the data, or if data we provide is deemed to infringe upon the rights of others.
Finally, cybersecurity and data privacy have become high priorities for regulators, and many jurisdictions are enacting
laws and regulations in these areas. For example, effective from May 2018, the EU significantly increased the potential
penalties for noncompliance with requirements for the handling and maintenance of personal and sensitive data
concerning customers and employees. Our failure to comply with these requirements could result in penalties of up to
4% of our global revenues, adverse regulatory actions and/or harm to our reputation. While we strive to comply with all
applicable laws and regulations, any failure by us to comply could result in regulatory investigations and penalties as
well as negative publicity, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Intech’s investment process is highly dependent on key employees and proprietary software.
Intech uses a proprietary investment process (which relates to approximately 12% of our AUM as of December 31,
2019), which is based on complex and proprietary mathematical models that seek to outperform various indices by
capitalizing on the volatility in stock price movements while controlling trading costs and overall risk relative to the
index. The maintenance of such models for current products and the development of new products are highly dependent
on certain key Intech employees. If Intech is unable to retain key personnel or properly transition key personnel
responsibilities to others, if the mathematical investment strategies developed by Intech fail to produce the intended
results, or if errors occur in the development or implementation of Intech’s mathematical models, Intech may not be able
to maintain its historical level of investment performance, which could adversely affect our AUM, results of operations
and financial condition, and could also result in legal claims against us or regulatory investigations with respect to our
operations.
Failure to maintain adequate controls and risk management policies, the circumvention of controls and policies, or
fraud, as well as failure to maintain adequate infrastructure or failures in operational or risk management processes
and systems could have an adverse effect on our AUM, results of operation and financial condition.
We have a comprehensive risk management process and continuously look to enhance the various controls, procedures,
policies and systems we use to monitor and manage risks to our business. However, there can be no assurances that such
controls, procedures, policies and systems will successfully identify and manage internal and external risks to our
business. We are subject to the risk that our employees, contractors or other third parties may deliberately seek to
circumvent established controls to commit fraud or act in ways that are inconsistent with our controls, policies and
procedures. Any operational errors or negligence by our employees, or others acting on our behalf, or weaknesses in the
internal controls over those processes could result in losses for us, and we may be required to compensate clients for
losses suffered and/or regulatory fines. Persistent or repeated incidents involving conflicts of interest, circumvention of
policies and controls, fraud or insider trading could have a materially adverse impact on our reputation and could lead to
costly regulatory inquiries.
Our business is also highly dependent on the integrity, security and reliability of our information technology systems and
infrastructure. If any of our critical systems or infrastructure do not operate properly or are disabled, our ability to
perform effective investment management on behalf of our clients could be impaired. In addition, if we fail to maintain
an infrastructure commensurate with the size and scope of our business, our productivity and growth could be negatively
affected, which could have an adverse impact on our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
18
19
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Insurance may not be available on a cost-effective basis to protect us from potential liabilities.
We face the inherent risk of liability related to litigation from clients and third-party vendors, actions taken by regulatory
agencies, and costs and losses associated with cyber incidents. To help protect against these potential liabilities, we have
purchased insurance in amounts, and against risks, that we consider appropriate, where such insurance is available at
prices we deem reasonable. There can be no assurance, however, that a claim or claims will be covered by insurance or,
if covered, will not exceed coverage limits, that an insurer will meet its obligations regarding coverage, or that insurance
coverage will continue to be available on a cost-effective basis. Insurance costs are impacted by market conditions and
the risk profile of the insured, and may increase significantly over relatively short periods. In addition, certain insurance
coverage may not be available or may only be available at prohibitive cost. Renewals of insurance policies may expose
us to additional costs through higher premiums or the assumption of higher deductibles or co-insurance liability.
Our business may be vulnerable to failures of support systems and client service functions provided by third-party
vendors.
Our client service capabilities as well as our ability to obtain prompt and accurate securities pricing information and to
process client transactions and reports are significantly dependent on communication and information systems and
services provided by third-party vendors. The ability to consistently and reliably obtain securities pricing information,
process client transactions and provide reports and other client services to the shareholders of funds and other investment
products we manage are essential to our operations. Any delays, errors or inaccuracies in pricing information, processing
client transactions or providing reports, and any other inadequacies in other client service functions could impact client
relationships, result in financial losses and potentially give rise to regulatory actions and claims against us.
We depend on third-party service providers and other key vendors for various fund administration, accounting, custody,
risk analytics, market data, market indices and transfer agent roles, and other distribution and operational needs. If our
third-party service providers or other key vendors fail to fulfill their obligations, experience service interruptions, cease
providing their services on short notice or otherwise provide inadequate service, it could lead to operational and
regulatory problems, including with respect to certain of our products, which could result in losses, enforcement actions,
or reputational harm, and which could negatively impact our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
Our inability to recover successfully, should we experience a disaster or other business continuity problem, could
cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, legal liability and/or reputational harm.
Significant portions of our business operations and those of our critical third-party service providers are concentrated in
a few geographic areas, including the UK, the U.S., Luxembourg and Australia. Should we, or any of our critical service
providers, experience a significant local or regional disaster or other business continuity event, such as an earthquake,
hurricane, tsunami, terrorist attack, epidemic or other natural or man-made disaster, our continued success will depend in
part on the safety and availability of our personnel, our office facilities and the proper functioning of our technology,
computer, telecommunications and other systems and operations that are critical to our business. We have developed
various backup systems and contingency plans, but no assurance can be given that they will be adequate in all
circumstances that could arise or that material interruptions and disruptions will not occur. In addition, we will rely to
varying degrees on outside vendors for disaster recovery support, and no assurance can be given that these vendors will
be able to perform in an adequate and timely manner. If we, or any of our critical service providers, are unable to
respond adequately to such an event in a timely manner, we may be unable to continue our business operations, which
could damage our reputation and lead to a loss of customers and have an adverse effect on our AUM, revenue and net
income.
Our ability to maintain our credit ratings, and to access the capital markets in a timely manner should we seek to do
so, depends on a number of factors.
Our access to the capital markets depends significantly on our credit ratings. In addition our credit facility borrowing
rates are tied to our credit ratings. A reduction in our long-term credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs and
could limit our access to the capital markets. Volatility in global financial and capital markets may also affect our ability
20
Table of Contents Insurance may not be available on a cost-effective basis to protect us from potential liabilities.
We face the inherent risk of liability related to litigation from clients and third-party vendors, actions taken by regulatory
agencies, and costs and losses associated with cyber incidents. To help protect against these potential liabilities, we have
purchased insurance in amounts, and against risks, that we consider appropriate, where such insurance is available at
prices we deem reasonable. There can be no assurance, however, that a claim or claims will be covered by insurance or,
if covered, will not exceed coverage limits, that an insurer will meet its obligations regarding coverage, or that insurance
coverage will continue to be available on a cost-effective basis. Insurance costs are impacted by market conditions and
the risk profile of the insured, and may increase significantly over relatively short periods. In addition, certain insurance
coverage may not be available or may only be available at prohibitive cost. Renewals of insurance policies may expose
us to additional costs through higher premiums or the assumption of higher deductibles or co-insurance liability.
to access the capital markets should we seek to do so. If we are unable to access capital markets in a timely manner, our
business could be adversely affected.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our indebtedness could limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, debt servicing requirements or other purposes. Debt servicing requirements may increase our vulnerability
to adverse economic, market and industry conditions; limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in
business operations or to the asset management industry overall; and place us at a disadvantage relative to competitors
that have lower debt. Any or all of the above factors could adversely affect our AUM, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our business may be vulnerable to failures of support systems and client service functions provided by third-party
Legal and Regulatory Risks
vendors.
Our client service capabilities as well as our ability to obtain prompt and accurate securities pricing information and to
process client transactions and reports are significantly dependent on communication and information systems and
services provided by third-party vendors. The ability to consistently and reliably obtain securities pricing information,
process client transactions and provide reports and other client services to the shareholders of funds and other investment
products we manage are essential to our operations. Any delays, errors or inaccuracies in pricing information, processing
client transactions or providing reports, and any other inadequacies in other client service functions could impact client
relationships, result in financial losses and potentially give rise to regulatory actions and claims against us.
We depend on third-party service providers and other key vendors for various fund administration, accounting, custody,
risk analytics, market data, market indices and transfer agent roles, and other distribution and operational needs. If our
third-party service providers or other key vendors fail to fulfill their obligations, experience service interruptions, cease
providing their services on short notice or otherwise provide inadequate service, it could lead to operational and
regulatory problems, including with respect to certain of our products, which could result in losses, enforcement actions,
or reputational harm, and which could negatively impact our AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
Our inability to recover successfully, should we experience a disaster or other business continuity problem, could
cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, legal liability and/or reputational harm.
Significant portions of our business operations and those of our critical third-party service providers are concentrated in
a few geographic areas, including the UK, the U.S., Luxembourg and Australia. Should we, or any of our critical service
providers, experience a significant local or regional disaster or other business continuity event, such as an earthquake,
hurricane, tsunami, terrorist attack, epidemic or other natural or man-made disaster, our continued success will depend in
part on the safety and availability of our personnel, our office facilities and the proper functioning of our technology,
computer, telecommunications and other systems and operations that are critical to our business. We have developed
various backup systems and contingency plans, but no assurance can be given that they will be adequate in all
circumstances that could arise or that material interruptions and disruptions will not occur. In addition, we will rely to
varying degrees on outside vendors for disaster recovery support, and no assurance can be given that these vendors will
be able to perform in an adequate and timely manner. If we, or any of our critical service providers, are unable to
respond adequately to such an event in a timely manner, we may be unable to continue our business operations, which
could damage our reputation and lead to a loss of customers and have an adverse effect on our AUM, revenue and net
income.
Our ability to maintain our credit ratings, and to access the capital markets in a timely manner should we seek to do
so, depends on a number of factors.
Our access to the capital markets depends significantly on our credit ratings. In addition our credit facility borrowing
rates are tied to our credit ratings. A reduction in our long-term credit ratings could increase our borrowing costs and
could limit our access to the capital markets. Volatility in global financial and capital markets may also affect our ability
Regulatory and governmental examinations and/or investigations, litigation and the legal risks associated with our
business could adversely impact our AUM, increase costs and negatively impact our profitability and/or our future
financial results.
From time to time, we receive and respond to regulatory and governmental requests for documents or other information,
subpoenas, examinations and investigations in connection with our business activities. In addition, from time to time, we
are named as a party in litigation. Even if claims made against us are without merit, litigation typically is an expensive
process. Risks associated with legal liability often are difficult to assess or quantify and their existence and magnitude
can remain unknown for significant periods of time. Among other things, such matters may result in fines, censure, legal
damages, suspension of personnel, revocation of licenses and reputational damage, which may reduce our sales and
increase redemptions. Eventual exposures from and expenses incurred relating to any examinations, investigations,
litigation, and/or settlements could adversely impact our AUM, increase costs and/or negatively impact our profitability
and financial results. Allegations, findings or judgments of wrongdoing by regulatory or governmental authorities or in
litigation against us, or settlements with respect thereto, could affect our reputation, increase our costs of doing business
and/or negatively impact our revenues, any of which could have a material negative impact on our financial results.
We operate in an industry that is highly regulated in most countries, and any enforcement action or changes in the
laws or regulations governing our business could adversely affect our AUM, results of operations or financial
condition.
Like all investment management firms, our activities are highly regulated in almost all countries in which we conduct
business, including the U.S., the UK, Europe, Australia, Singapore and other international markets. A substantial portion
of the products and services we provide are regulated by one or more of the following:
●
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and the National Futures Association (“NFA”) in the U.S.;
●
the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the UK;
●
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”);
●
the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”); and
●
the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (“CSSF”) in Luxembourg.
In addition, subsidiaries operating in the EU are subject to various EU directives, which are implemented by member
state national legislation, and regulations, which are directly applicable without further implementation. Our operations
elsewhere in the world are regulated by similar regulatory organizations.
20
21
Table of Contents Table of Contents Laws and regulations applied at the international, national, state or provincial and local levels generally grant
governmental agencies and industry self-regulatory authorities broad administrative discretion over our activities,
including the power to limit or restrict our business activities; to conduct examinations, risk assessments, investigations
and capital adequacy reviews; and to impose remedial programs to address perceived deficiencies. As a result of
regulatory oversight, we could face requirements that negatively impact the way in which we conduct business, increase
compliance costs, impose additional capital requirements and/or involve enforcement actions that could lead to sanctions
up to and including the revocation of licenses to operate certain businesses, the suspension or expulsion from a particular
jurisdiction or market of any of our business organizations or key personnel, or the imposition of fines and censures on
us or our employees. Judgments or findings of wrongdoing by regulatory or governmental authorities, or in private
litigation against us, could affect our reputation, increase our costs of doing business and/or negatively impact revenues,
any of which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
The regulatory environment in which we operate changes frequently and has seen a significant increase in regulation in
recent years. Various changes in laws and regulations have been enacted or otherwise developed in multiple jurisdictions
globally in recent years, and various other proposals remain under consideration by legislators, regulators and other
government officials and public policy commentators. Certain enacted provisions and other proposals are potentially far-
reaching and, depending upon their implementation, could increase the cost of offering mutual funds and other
investment products and services and have material adverse effects on our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
Proposed Changes in the U.S. Regulatory Framework
In the U.S., the government and other institutions have taken action, and may continue to take further action, in response
to volatility in the global financial markets. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law in July 2010. Certain
provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have required us, and other provisions will or may require us, to change and or impose
new limitations on the manner in which we conduct business. More generally, the Dodd-Frank Act has increased our
regulatory burdens and related compliance costs. Rulemaking is still ongoing for the Dodd-Frank Act, and any further
actions could include new rules and requirements that may be applicable to us, the effect of which could have additional
adverse consequences to our business, results of operations or financial condition. The Trump administration has
indicated a desire to repeal, revise or replace aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act, but the timing and details on specific
proposals are uncertain.
Regulators also continue to examine different aspects of the asset management industry. For example, in December
2014, the then-chairperson of the SEC announced a comprehensive agenda for regulatory change governing the U.S.
asset management industry and directed SEC staff to develop a five-part series of new regulations addressing the topics
of enhanced portfolio reporting, liquidity risk management, leverage and use of derivatives, adviser wind-up, and stress
testing for funds and advisers. This resulted in new regulations regarding enhanced portfolio reporting (Investment
Company Reporting Modernization Reforms) and liquidity risk management (Investment Company Liquidity Risk
Management Rules). The SEC has proposed a new rule that would materially restrict the manner in which many
investment companies use derivatives transactions (swaps, futures and forwards) and financial commitment transactions
(reverse repurchase agreements, but not repurchase agreements), short sale borrowings or any other firm or standby
financial commitment. In June 2019, the SEC adopted Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”), which establishes a “best
interest” standard of conduct for broker-dealers and associated persons. Since then, states and other fiduciary rule
initiatives and challenges have been raised. These new industry rules can be expected to add additional reporting,
operational and compliance costs, and may affect the development of new products. It is unclear whether any of the
former SEC chairperson’s other initiatives will result in any new rulemaking.
The FSOC has the authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to review the activities of non-bank financial companies
predominantly engaged in financial activities and designate those companies determined to be “systemically important”
for supervision by the Federal Reserve. To date, the FSOC has not designated any asset management firms or funds as a
systemically important financial institution. In the unlikely event that such designation was to occur, we would be
subject to significantly increased levels of regulation, including, without limitation, a requirement to adopt heightened
standards relating to capital, leverage, liquidity, risk management, credit exposure reporting and concentration limits,
restrictions on acquisitions and annual stress tests by the Federal Reserve.
22
Table of Contents Laws and regulations applied at the international, national, state or provincial and local levels generally grant
governmental agencies and industry self-regulatory authorities broad administrative discretion over our activities,
including the power to limit or restrict our business activities; to conduct examinations, risk assessments, investigations
and capital adequacy reviews; and to impose remedial programs to address perceived deficiencies. As a result of
regulatory oversight, we could face requirements that negatively impact the way in which we conduct business, increase
compliance costs, impose additional capital requirements and/or involve enforcement actions that could lead to sanctions
up to and including the revocation of licenses to operate certain businesses, the suspension or expulsion from a particular
jurisdiction or market of any of our business organizations or key personnel, or the imposition of fines and censures on
us or our employees. Judgments or findings of wrongdoing by regulatory or governmental authorities, or in private
litigation against us, could affect our reputation, increase our costs of doing business and/or negatively impact revenues,
any of which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
The regulatory environment in which we operate changes frequently and has seen a significant increase in regulation in
recent years. Various changes in laws and regulations have been enacted or otherwise developed in multiple jurisdictions
globally in recent years, and various other proposals remain under consideration by legislators, regulators and other
government officials and public policy commentators. Certain enacted provisions and other proposals are potentially far-
reaching and, depending upon their implementation, could increase the cost of offering mutual funds and other
investment products and services and have material adverse effects on our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
Proposed Changes in the U.S. Regulatory Framework
In the U.S., the government and other institutions have taken action, and may continue to take further action, in response
to volatility in the global financial markets. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law in July 2010. Certain
provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have required us, and other provisions will or may require us, to change and or impose
new limitations on the manner in which we conduct business. More generally, the Dodd-Frank Act has increased our
regulatory burdens and related compliance costs. Rulemaking is still ongoing for the Dodd-Frank Act, and any further
actions could include new rules and requirements that may be applicable to us, the effect of which could have additional
adverse consequences to our business, results of operations or financial condition. The Trump administration has
indicated a desire to repeal, revise or replace aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act, but the timing and details on specific
proposals are uncertain.
Regulators also continue to examine different aspects of the asset management industry. For example, in December
2014, the then-chairperson of the SEC announced a comprehensive agenda for regulatory change governing the U.S.
asset management industry and directed SEC staff to develop a five-part series of new regulations addressing the topics
of enhanced portfolio reporting, liquidity risk management, leverage and use of derivatives, adviser wind-up, and stress
testing for funds and advisers. This resulted in new regulations regarding enhanced portfolio reporting (Investment
Company Reporting Modernization Reforms) and liquidity risk management (Investment Company Liquidity Risk
Management Rules). The SEC has proposed a new rule that would materially restrict the manner in which many
investment companies use derivatives transactions (swaps, futures and forwards) and financial commitment transactions
(reverse repurchase agreements, but not repurchase agreements), short sale borrowings or any other firm or standby
financial commitment. In June 2019, the SEC adopted Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”), which establishes a “best
interest” standard of conduct for broker-dealers and associated persons. Since then, states and other fiduciary rule
initiatives and challenges have been raised. These new industry rules can be expected to add additional reporting,
operational and compliance costs, and may affect the development of new products. It is unclear whether any of the
former SEC chairperson’s other initiatives will result in any new rulemaking.
The FSOC has the authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to review the activities of non-bank financial companies
predominantly engaged in financial activities and designate those companies determined to be “systemically important”
for supervision by the Federal Reserve. To date, the FSOC has not designated any asset management firms or funds as a
systemically important financial institution. In the unlikely event that such designation was to occur, we would be
subject to significantly increased levels of regulation, including, without limitation, a requirement to adopt heightened
standards relating to capital, leverage, liquidity, risk management, credit exposure reporting and concentration limits,
restrictions on acquisitions and annual stress tests by the Federal Reserve.
The full extent of the impact on us of the Dodd-Frank Act or any other new laws, regulations or initiatives that may be
proposed, and regulatory reform initiatives and enforcement agendas pursued by regulators such as the SEC and the
DOL (which have separately expressed support for investor protection initiatives that may impact how and to whom
certain investment products can be distributed in the U.S.), is impossible to determine. These changes have imposed, and
may continue to impose, new compliance costs and/or capital requirements or impact us in other ways that could have a
material adverse impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, certain legal or
regulatory changes could require us to modify our strategies, businesses or operations, and these changes may result in
the incurrence of other new constraints or costs, including the investment of significant management time and resources
in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment.
Changes in the European Union Regulatory Framework
The EU has promulgated or is considering various new or revised directives pertaining to financial services, including
investment managers. Such directives are progressing at various stages and either has been or will be implemented by
national legislation of member states. The MiFID II is an example of such regulation, which seeks to promote a single
market for wholesale and retail transactions in financial instruments. MiFID II, which was effective on January 3, 2018,
addresses the conduct of business rules for intermediaries providing investment services and the effective, efficient and
safe operation of financial markets. Key elements of MiFID II in relation to investor protection measures include
changes to the extent to which retrocessions may be paid and provisions regarding the use of trading commissions to
fund research. Further such regulatory changes may have a direct impact on the revenue of our business should they
result in operational changes and may increase operational or compliance costs.
Various regulators have promulgated or are considering other new disclosure or suitability requirements pertaining to the
distribution of investment funds and other investment products or services, including enhanced standards and
requirements pertaining to disclosures made to retail investors at the point of sale. We do not believe implementation of
these directives will fundamentally change the asset management industry or cause us to reconsider our fundamental
strategy, but certain provisions may require us to change or impose new limitations on the manner in which we conduct
business and may result in increased fee and margin pressure from clients. They also have increased regulatory burdens
and compliance costs and will or may continue to do so. Certain provisions, such as MiFID II, may have unintended
adverse consequences on the liquidity or structure of the financial markets. Similar regulations are being implemented or
considered in other jurisdictions where we do business and could have similar effects.
In addition, a new EU law provides that, effective June 2021, a revised prudential regime will be applicable to our EU
subsidiaries that are investment firms for the purposes of MiFID II. In summary, such investment firms will be subject to
a new prudential framework, replacing the requirements set out in the Capital Requirements Directives III (“CRD III”).
“K-factors” will be used in the classification of investment firms and in the new capital requirements methodology for
investment firms. K-factors are quantitative indicators intended to represent the risks that an investment firm can pose to
customers, to market access or liquidity, and to the firm itself. Investment firms could be subject to revised regulatory
capital, remuneration and governance standards. The European Commission also intends to use the new regime to
tighten requirements relating to the supervision of firms with parent undertakings in third countries. The aim of the
framework is to simplify the prudential classification of investment firms and establish a single harmonized approach to
their prudential requirements. It also seeks to increase proportionality and risk-sensitivity, and reduce the complexity of
the existing system.
In April 2018, the FCA published a policy statement outlining its feedback and final rules relating to its Asset
Management Market Study. The final rules and guidance cover a number of areas, including a requirements for
managers of UK funds to (i) make an annual assessment of value (as part of their duty to act in the best interests of the
investors in their funds), (ii) appoint a minimum of two independent directors to the boards of companies managing UK-
domiciled funds and (iii) publish additional information regarding benchmarks and performance targets for such funds.
The final rules and guidance have a staged implementation, which began in 2019 and will finish in 2020. The European
Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) also adopted guidance regarding fund benchmarks in March 2019 which
was inspired by that of the FCA and must be implemented along a similar timetable.
22
23
Table of Contents Table of Contents The full impact of potential legal and regulatory changes or possible enforcement proceedings on our business cannot be
predicted. Such changes have imposed, and may continue to impose, new compliance costs and/or capital requirements,
including costs related to information technology systems, or may impact us in other ways that could have an adverse
impact on our results of operations or financial condition, including by placing further downward pressure on fees.
Similarly, regulatory enforcement actions that impose significant penalties or compliance obligations or that result in
significant reputational harm could have similar adverse effects on us. Moreover, certain legal or regulatory changes
could require us to modify our strategies, business or operations, and could require us to invest significant management
time and resources in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment. In
recent years, certain regulatory developments have also put additional pressure on our fee levels.
We cannot predict the nature of future changes to the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to our business, nor
the extent of the impacts on our business of future proposals. However, any such changes are likely to increase the costs
of compliance and the complexity of our operations. They may also result in changes to our product or service offerings.
The changing regulatory landscape may also impact a number of our service providers and, to the extent such providers
alter their services or increase their fees, it may impact our expenses or those of the products we offer.
Regulators may impose increased capital requirements on us, which could negatively impact our ability to return
capital or pay dividends to our shareholders and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Regulators typically have broad discretion to impose increased regulatory capital requirements on the regulated entities
within their jurisdiction. It is possible that the regulatory capital requirements that currently apply to our business could
be increased. For example, there are EU proposals which, if introduced, would mean a revised prudential regime would
be applicable to our EU subsidiaries that are investment firms for the purposes of MiFID II. The imposition of increased
regulatory capital requirements could negatively impact our ability to return capital or pay dividends to shareholders,
restrict our ability to make future acquisitions or, should we be required to raise additional capital, negatively impact our
results of operations and financial condition.
Failure to comply with client contractual requirements and/or investment guidelines could negatively impact our
AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
Many of the investment management agreements under which we manage assets or provide services specify investment
guidelines or requirements that we are required to observe. Laws and regulations also impose similar requirements for
certain accounts. A failure to follow these guidelines or requirements could result in damage to our reputation or in
clients seeking to recover losses, withdrawing their assets or terminating their contracts, any one of which could cause
revenues and profitability to decline. In addition, breach of these investment guidelines or requirements could result in
regulatory investigation, censure and/or fines.
The exit of the UK from the European Union could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
On January 31, 2020, the UK left the EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” Under the terms of the Brexit withdrawal
agreement between the UK and the EU, the UK has entered a transition period whereby it is no longer a member of the
EU but will remain a member of the single market and customs union until December 31, 2020. The purpose of the
transition period is to provide time for the UK and the EU to negotiate their future relationship. Arrangements for trade
with the EU will remain essentially unchanged until the end of the transition period. EU law will continue to apply in the
UK during the transition period and therefore passporting will continue, as will consumer rights and protections derived
from EU law. At the end of the transition period, the UK’s relationship with the EU will be determined by the new
agreements it will enter into on trade and other areas of co-operation. In the absence of the UK and the EU agreeing on a
trade deal to begin when the transition period ends, or agreeing on an extension to the transition period, the UK will exit
the transition period on December 31, 2020, trading on World Trade Organization terms with the EU. Other areas of co-
operation between the UK and the EU may also be affected if no deal is reached.
We remain headquartered in the UK and conduct business in Europe through our subsidiaries and branches in the EU as
well as conducting cross-border business into the EU from the UK. Depending on the final terms of the UK’s withdrawal
24
Table of Contents The full impact of potential legal and regulatory changes or possible enforcement proceedings on our business cannot be
predicted. Such changes have imposed, and may continue to impose, new compliance costs and/or capital requirements,
including costs related to information technology systems, or may impact us in other ways that could have an adverse
impact on our results of operations or financial condition, including by placing further downward pressure on fees.
Similarly, regulatory enforcement actions that impose significant penalties or compliance obligations or that result in
significant reputational harm could have similar adverse effects on us. Moreover, certain legal or regulatory changes
could require us to modify our strategies, business or operations, and could require us to invest significant management
time and resources in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements or to compete in a changed business environment. In
recent years, certain regulatory developments have also put additional pressure on our fee levels.
We cannot predict the nature of future changes to the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to our business, nor
the extent of the impacts on our business of future proposals. However, any such changes are likely to increase the costs
of compliance and the complexity of our operations. They may also result in changes to our product or service offerings.
The changing regulatory landscape may also impact a number of our service providers and, to the extent such providers
alter their services or increase their fees, it may impact our expenses or those of the products we offer.
Regulators may impose increased capital requirements on us, which could negatively impact our ability to return
capital or pay dividends to our shareholders and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Regulators typically have broad discretion to impose increased regulatory capital requirements on the regulated entities
within their jurisdiction. It is possible that the regulatory capital requirements that currently apply to our business could
be increased. For example, there are EU proposals which, if introduced, would mean a revised prudential regime would
be applicable to our EU subsidiaries that are investment firms for the purposes of MiFID II. The imposition of increased
regulatory capital requirements could negatively impact our ability to return capital or pay dividends to shareholders,
restrict our ability to make future acquisitions or, should we be required to raise additional capital, negatively impact our
results of operations and financial condition.
Failure to comply with client contractual requirements and/or investment guidelines could negatively impact our
AUM, results of operations and financial condition.
Many of the investment management agreements under which we manage assets or provide services specify investment
guidelines or requirements that we are required to observe. Laws and regulations also impose similar requirements for
certain accounts. A failure to follow these guidelines or requirements could result in damage to our reputation or in
clients seeking to recover losses, withdrawing their assets or terminating their contracts, any one of which could cause
revenues and profitability to decline. In addition, breach of these investment guidelines or requirements could result in
regulatory investigation, censure and/or fines.
The exit of the UK from the European Union could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
On January 31, 2020, the UK left the EU, commonly referred to as “Brexit.” Under the terms of the Brexit withdrawal
agreement between the UK and the EU, the UK has entered a transition period whereby it is no longer a member of the
EU but will remain a member of the single market and customs union until December 31, 2020. The purpose of the
transition period is to provide time for the UK and the EU to negotiate their future relationship. Arrangements for trade
with the EU will remain essentially unchanged until the end of the transition period. EU law will continue to apply in the
UK during the transition period and therefore passporting will continue, as will consumer rights and protections derived
from EU law. At the end of the transition period, the UK’s relationship with the EU will be determined by the new
agreements it will enter into on trade and other areas of co-operation. In the absence of the UK and the EU agreeing on a
trade deal to begin when the transition period ends, or agreeing on an extension to the transition period, the UK will exit
the transition period on December 31, 2020, trading on World Trade Organization terms with the EU. Other areas of co-
operation between the UK and the EU may also be affected if no deal is reached.
We remain headquartered in the UK and conduct business in Europe through our subsidiaries and branches in the EU as
well as conducting cross-border business into the EU from the UK. Depending on the final terms of the UK’s withdrawal
from the EU, and despite steps we have already undertaken in preparation for the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, we will
face additional costs, including possibly additional taxation, and other challenges, including new impediments to
conducting EU business and costs of restructuring and other changes to facilitate continuing European business
activities. Should UK-based asset management firms lose their current level of access to the single EU market as a result
of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, we may incur additional costs due to having to relocate additional activities to a
location within the EU.
A decline in trade between the UK and EU could affect the attractiveness of the UK as a global investment center and
could have a detrimental impact on UK economic growth. Although we have a diverse international customer base, our
results could be adversely affected by the market impacts of reduced UK economic growth and greater volatility in the
pound sterling. There could also be changes to UK and EU immigration policies as a result of the UK’s withdrawal from
the EU, which could lead to restrictions on the free movement of investment and support staff between the UK and the
EU.
Any of the foregoing factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial
condition.
We may not manage risks associated with the replacement of benchmark indices effectively.
The withdrawal and replacement of widely used benchmark indices such as the London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) with alternative benchmark rates introduces a number of risks for our business, our clients and the financial
services industry more widely. These includes legal implementation risks, as extensive changes to documentation for
new and existing clients and transactions may be required; financial risks, arising from any changes in the valuation of
financial instruments linked to benchmark indices; pricing risks, as changes to benchmark indices could impact pricing
mechanisms on some instruments; operational risks, due to the potential requirement to adapt information technology
systems, trade reporting infrastructure and operational processes; and conduct risks, relating to communications with a
potential impact on customers and engagement during the transition away from benchmark indices such as LIBOR.
It is expected that a transition away from the widespread use of LIBOR to alternative benchmark rates will occur over
the course of the next few years. The FCA, which regulates LIBOR, has announced that it has commitments from panel
banks to continue to contribute to LIBOR through the end of 2021, but that the FCA will not use its powers to compel
contributions beyond such date. Accordingly, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the publication of LIBOR
beyond 2021. Accordingly, it is not currently possible to determine precisely whether, or to what extent, the withdrawal
and replacement of LIBOR would affect us. However, the implementation of alternative benchmark rates to LIBOR may
have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
We may be subject to claims of lack of suitability.
If our clients suffer losses on funds or investment mandates we manage, they may seek compensation from us on the
basis of allegations that these funds or mandates were not suitable for them or that the fund prospectuses or other
marketing materials contained material errors or were misleading. Despite the controls relating to disclosure in fund
prospectuses and marketing materials, it is possible that such action may be successful, which in turn could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any claim for lack of suitability could also result in a
regulatory investigation, censure or fines, and may damage our reputation.
As a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to certain U.S. securities law disclosure requirements that apply to
domestic U.S. issuers, which may limit the information publicly available to our shareholders.
As a foreign private issuer, we are not required to comply with all of the periodic disclosure and current reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act and, therefore, there may be less publicly available information about us than if we
were a U.S. domestic issuer. For example, we are not subject to the proxy rules in the U.S. and disclosure with respect to
our annual meetings is governed by Jersey law and ASX requirements. In addition, our officers, directors and significant
shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange
24
25
Table of Contents Table of Contents Act and the rules thereunder. Therefore, our shareholders may not know on a timely basis when the company’s officers,
directors and significant shareholders purchase or sell shares.
Risks Related to Taxes
Changes to tax laws could adversely affect us.
The determination of our provision for income taxes requires judgment, the use of estimates and the interpretation and
application of complex tax laws. Our provision for income taxes reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in
the various U.S. federal and state, UK and other jurisdictions. Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or decreases in
permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits or
valuation allowances, and any changes in our mix of earnings from these taxing jurisdictions affect the overall effective
tax rate and the amount of tax payable by us.
Our tax affairs will, in the ordinary course of business, be reviewed by tax authorities, which may disagree with certain
positions that we have taken or will take in the future and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely
outcomes of such tax inquiries, investigations or audits in order to determine the appropriateness of their respective tax
provisions. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these inquiries,
investigations or audits, and the actual outcomes of these inquiries, investigations or audits could have a material impact
on our financial results.
As a result of the Merger, the IRS may assert that we are to be treated as a domestic corporation or otherwise subject
to certain adverse consequences for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Although we are a public limited company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and tax resident in the UK, the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) may assert that, as a result of the Merger, we should be treated as a U.S.
corporation (and, therefore, a U.S. tax resident) for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to section 7874 of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 7874”).
Section 7874 provides that if, following an acquisition of a U.S. corporation by a non-U.S. corporation, at least 80% of
the acquiring non-U.S. corporation’s stock (by vote or value) is considered to be held by former shareholders of the U.S.
corporation by reason of holding stock of such U.S. corporation (such percentage referred to as the “ownership
percentage” and such test referred to as the “80% ownership test”), and the “expanded affiliated group,” which includes
the acquiring non-U.S. corporation, does not have substantial business activities in the country in which the acquiring
non-U.S. corporation is created or organized, then the non U.S. corporation would be treated as a U.S. corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes even though it is a corporation created and organized outside the U.S.
We do not believe that the 80% ownership test was satisfied as a result of the Merger. If the 80% ownership test were
satisfied and, as a result, we were treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we could be liable
for substantial additional U.S. federal income tax on our operations and income. Additionally, if we were treated as a
U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, non-U.S. Shareholders would generally be subject to U.S.
withholding tax on the gross amount of any dividends we pay to such shareholders.
Section 7874 also provides that if, following an acquisition of a U.S. corporation by a non-U.S. corporation, the
ownership percentage is equal to or greater than 60% but less than 80% (such test referred to as the “60% ownership
test”), then the U.S. corporation and its affiliates could be prohibited from using their foreign tax credits or other U.S.
federal tax attributes to offset the income or gain recognized by reason of the transfer of property to a non-U.S. related
person or any income received or accrued by reason of a license of any property by such U.S. entity to a non-U.S.-
related person. Further, certain JCG stock compensation held directly or indirectly by management prior to the Merger
would be subject to an excise tax at a rate equal to 15%. In addition, under U.S. Treasury temporary regulations, our
ability to integrate certain non-U.S. operations or to access cash earned by non-U.S. subsidiaries may be limited. We do
not believe that the 60% ownership test was satisfied as a result of the Merger.
26
Table of Contents Act and the rules thereunder. Therefore, our shareholders may not know on a timely basis when the company’s officers,
directors and significant shareholders purchase or sell shares.
Risks Related to Taxes
Changes to tax laws could adversely affect us.
The determination of our provision for income taxes requires judgment, the use of estimates and the interpretation and
application of complex tax laws. Our provision for income taxes reflects a combination of income earned and taxed in
the various U.S. federal and state, UK and other jurisdictions. Jurisdictional tax law changes, increases or decreases in
permanent differences between book and tax items, accruals or adjustments of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits or
valuation allowances, and any changes in our mix of earnings from these taxing jurisdictions affect the overall effective
tax rate and the amount of tax payable by us.
Our tax affairs will, in the ordinary course of business, be reviewed by tax authorities, which may disagree with certain
positions that we have taken or will take in the future and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely
outcomes of such tax inquiries, investigations or audits in order to determine the appropriateness of their respective tax
provisions. However, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these inquiries,
investigations or audits, and the actual outcomes of these inquiries, investigations or audits could have a material impact
on our financial results.
As a result of the Merger, the IRS may assert that we are to be treated as a domestic corporation or otherwise subject
to certain adverse consequences for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Although we are a public limited company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and tax resident in the UK, the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) may assert that, as a result of the Merger, we should be treated as a U.S.
corporation (and, therefore, a U.S. tax resident) for U.S. federal income tax purposes pursuant to section 7874 of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 7874”).
Section 7874 provides that if, following an acquisition of a U.S. corporation by a non-U.S. corporation, at least 80% of
the acquiring non-U.S. corporation’s stock (by vote or value) is considered to be held by former shareholders of the U.S.
corporation by reason of holding stock of such U.S. corporation (such percentage referred to as the “ownership
percentage” and such test referred to as the “80% ownership test”), and the “expanded affiliated group,” which includes
the acquiring non-U.S. corporation, does not have substantial business activities in the country in which the acquiring
non-U.S. corporation is created or organized, then the non U.S. corporation would be treated as a U.S. corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes even though it is a corporation created and organized outside the U.S.
We do not believe that the 80% ownership test was satisfied as a result of the Merger. If the 80% ownership test were
satisfied and, as a result, we were treated as a U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we could be liable
for substantial additional U.S. federal income tax on our operations and income. Additionally, if we were treated as a
U.S. corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, non-U.S. Shareholders would generally be subject to U.S.
withholding tax on the gross amount of any dividends we pay to such shareholders.
Section 7874 also provides that if, following an acquisition of a U.S. corporation by a non-U.S. corporation, the
ownership percentage is equal to or greater than 60% but less than 80% (such test referred to as the “60% ownership
test”), then the U.S. corporation and its affiliates could be prohibited from using their foreign tax credits or other U.S.
federal tax attributes to offset the income or gain recognized by reason of the transfer of property to a non-U.S. related
person or any income received or accrued by reason of a license of any property by such U.S. entity to a non-U.S.-
related person. Further, certain JCG stock compensation held directly or indirectly by management prior to the Merger
would be subject to an excise tax at a rate equal to 15%. In addition, under U.S. Treasury temporary regulations, our
ability to integrate certain non-U.S. operations or to access cash earned by non-U.S. subsidiaries may be limited. We do
not believe that the 60% ownership test was satisfied as a result of the Merger.
Because there is only limited guidance on the manner in which the ownership percentage is to be determined, there can
be no assurance that the IRS will agree with the position that we are to be treated as a non-U.S. corporation or that we
are not to be subject to the other adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences associated with satisfying the 60%
ownership test.
Jersey Company Risks
Our ordinary shares, which we refer to as our common stock, are governed by the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands,
which may not provide the level of legal certainty and transparency afforded by incorporation in a U.S. state.
We are organized under the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands, a British crown dependency that is an island located off the
coast of Normandy, France. Jersey is not a member of the EU. Jersey, Channel Islands, legislation regarding companies
is largely based on English corporate law principles. However, there can be no assurance that the laws of Jersey,
Channel Islands, will not change in the future or that it will serve to protect investors in a similar fashion afforded under
corporate law principles in the U.S., which could adversely affect the rights of investors.
U.S. shareholders may not be able to enforce civil liabilities against us.
Certain of our directors and executive officers are not residents of the U.S. A substantial portion of the assets of such
persons are located outside the U.S. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within
the U.S. upon such persons.
Judgments of U.S. courts may not be directly enforceable outside of the U.S., and the enforcement of judgments of U.S.
courts outside of the U.S. may be subject to limitations. Investors may also have difficulties pursuing an original action
brought in a court in a jurisdiction outside the U.S. for liabilities under the securities laws of the U.S.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We have 30 offices across the UK, Europe, North America, Asia and Australia. Our corporate headquarters is located in
London, where it occupies approximately 128,000 square feet on a long-term lease that expires in 2028. We also have
significant operations in Denver, Colorado, occupying approximately 189,000 square feet of office space in two separate
locations. The primary office building in Denver accounts for 81% of the total square feet of office space in Denver, and
its lease expires in 2025. The remaining 27 offices total approximately 107,000 square feet and are all leased. In the
opinion of management, the space and equipment we lease is adequate for existing operating needs.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth in response to Item 103 of Regulation S-K under “Legal Proceedings” is incorporated by
reference from Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 19 – Commitments and
Contingencies: Litigation and Other Regulatory Matters.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
26
27
Table of Contents Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
JHG Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and our CDIs are traded on the ASX
(symbol: JHG). On December 31, 2019, there were approximately 42,663 holders of record of our common stock.
The following graph illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return (rounded to the nearest whole dollar) of our
common stock over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019, the last trading day of 2019, and compares it to the
cumulative total return on the Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index and the S&P Diversified Financials Index. The
comparison assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2014, in our common stock and in each of the foregoing
indices, and assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any. This data is not intended to forecast future performance of our
common stock.
Common Stock Purchases
At our 2018 Annual General Meeting, shareholders authorized us to make on-market purchases of up to 10% of our
issued share capital, and this authorization was renewed at our 2019 Annual General Meeting. In March 2019, we
commenced an on-market buyback program to repurchase up to $200 million of our common stock on the NYSE and
CDIs on the ASX. We repurchased a total of 9,437,071 shares of our common stock and CDIs for $199.9 million during
the year ended December 31, 2019.
28
Table of Contents
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
JHG Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and our CDIs are traded on the ASX
(symbol: JHG). On December 31, 2019, there were approximately 42,663 holders of record of our common stock.
The following graph illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return (rounded to the nearest whole dollar) of our
common stock over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019, the last trading day of 2019, and compares it to the
cumulative total return on the Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index and the S&P Diversified Financials Index. The
comparison assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2014, in our common stock and in each of the foregoing
indices, and assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any. This data is not intended to forecast future performance of our
common stock.
On February 3, 2020, the Board approved a new on-market share buyback program to be commenced and announced on
a date to be determined by us. We intend to spend up to $200 million to repurchase our common stock on the NYSE and
CDIs on the ASX as part of this buyback program, which is expected to be completed no later than the date of our 2021
Annual General Meeting. Purchases pursuant to the new buyback program after the date of our Annual General Meeting
to be held on April 30, 2020, will be subject to our obtaining renewed shareholder authorization for on-market purchases
at the 2020 Annual General Meeting. Further information regarding the proposed on-market buyback program will be
announced immediately prior to its finalization and formal launch.
In addition, during the first quarter of 2020, we intend to purchase shares on-market for the annual share grants
associated with the 2019 variable compensation payable to our employees. These purchases are unrelated to the new
Board-approved share buyback program discussed above. As a policy, we do not issue new shares to employees as part
of our annual compensation practices.
Some of our executives and employees receive rights over our common stock as part of their remuneration arrangements
and employee entitlements. These entitlements are usually satisfied by the transfer of existing common stock acquired
on-market. We purchased 1,630,669 shares at an average price of $23.33 in satisfaction of employee awards and
entitlements during the year ended December 31, 2019.
The following table presents our ordinary shares purchased on-market by month during 2019, in connection with the
share buyback program and in satisfaction of employee awards and entitlements.
Period
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total
Total number of shares Approximate U.S. dollar value
Average
price paid per
purchased as part of
publicly announced
programs
Total
number of
shares
purchased
30,777 $
1,531,114
1,269,514
11,898
1,736,733
1,774,971
28,540
2,718,106
1,448,509
2,361
513,015
2,202
11,067,740 $
share
22.39
23.40
24.53
22.49
21.73
21.21
21.09
18.70
21.07
23.07
24.44
24.57
21.50
of shares that may yet
be purchased under the
programs (end of month, in millions)
—
$ 200
$ 169
$ 169
$ 131
$ 94
$ 94
$ 43
$ 13
$ 13
—
—
—
—
1,258,443
—
1,734,183
1,772,866
—
2,715,114
1,445,545
—
510,920
—
9,437,071
Common Stock Purchases
At our 2018 Annual General Meeting, shareholders authorized us to make on-market purchases of up to 10% of our
issued share capital, and this authorization was renewed at our 2019 Annual General Meeting. In March 2019, we
commenced an on-market buyback program to repurchase up to $200 million of our common stock on the NYSE and
CDIs on the ASX. We repurchased a total of 9,437,071 shares of our common stock and CDIs for $199.9 million during
the year ended December 31, 2019.
28
29
Table of Contents Table of Contents
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data below was derived from our consolidated financial statements and should be read in
conjunction with Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of JHG, and Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Data presented for the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, are pre-merger and are not comparable with the results presented in 2017, 2018 or
2019. Data presented for the year ended December 31, 2017, includes the impact of the Merger from May 30, 2017,
through the end of the year.
Year ended December 31,
2015
2017
2019
(dollars in millions, except per share data and operating data)
2016
2018
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income:
Total revenues
Operating expenses
Operating income
Operating margin
Interest expense (1)
Investment gains (losses), net (2)
Other non-operating income (expenses), net
Income tax benefit (provision) (3)
Net income
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests (4)
Net income attributable to JHG
Earnings per share attributable to JHG common
shareholders:
786.1
232.1
$ 2,192.4 $ 2,306.4 $ 1,818.3 $ 1,018.2 $ 1,177.7
860.4
317.3
22.8% 26.9%
(20.1)
39.7
0.6
(6.1)
331.4
(1.6)
$ 427.6 $ 523.8 $ 655.5 $ 189.0 $ 329.8
1,656.6
649.8
28.2%
(15.7)
(40.9)
68.6
(162.2)
499.6
24.2
1,651.5
540.9
24.7%
(15.1)
34.2
23.5
(137.8)
445.7
(18.1)
1,376.0
442.3
24.3%
(11.9)
18.0
(1.0)
211.0
658.4
(2.9)
(6.6)
(11.7)
(1.9)
(34.6)
177.3
11.7
Diluted
$
2.21 $
2.61 $
3.93 $
1.66 $
2.78
Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding (in
millions)
Dividends declared and paid per share:
GBP
USD
Consolidated balance sheet (as of December 31):
Total assets
Long-term debt (including current portion)
Deferred income taxes, net
Other non-current liabilities
Redeemable noncontrolling interests (5)
Cash flow:
188.6
195.9
162.3
1,111.1 1,154.5
—
1.44 $
$
—
1.40 $
£0.0915
£0.1040 £0.0950
—
— $
0.64 $
$ 7,621.7 $ 6,911.9 $ 7,272.7 $ 2,433.4 $ 2,835.2
— $ 220.9
$ 316.2 $ 319.1 $ 379.2 $
86.3
70.7 $
$ 729.1 $ 729.9 $ 752.6 $
49.4
39.0 $
99.6 $
$ 158.8 $
82.9
$ 677.9 $ 136.1 $ 190.3 $ 158.0 $
79.2 $
Cash flows provided by operating activities
$ 463.2 $ 670.8 $ 444.1 $ 235.1 $ 388.9
Operating data (in billions):
Ending AUM
Average AUM
$ 374.8 $ 328.5 $ 370.8 $ 124.7 $ 135.6
$ 357.1 $ 367.7 $ 262.1 $ 129.4 $ 127.7
(1) We repaid our 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Convertible Notes”) in July 2018, causing
interest expense to decrease in 2019 compared to 2018. We repaid our 7.25% Senior Notes due 2016 (the “2016
Senior Notes”) in March 2016, causing interest expense to decrease in 2016 compared to 2015.
(2) We sold our share in a joint venture in 2015, and an $18.9 million gain was recognized.
(3) Our income tax provision in 2015 was extraordinarily low primarily due to one-off tax benefits, which included a
reduction in the UK tax rate, tax benefits arising from the exercise of stock-based compensation awards and the
settlement of tax positions with the UK tax authorities. Our income tax provision in 2017 includes a one-time tax
benefit of $340.7 million related to new U.S. tax legislation.
30
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data below was derived from our consolidated financial statements and should be read in
conjunction with Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of JHG, and Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Data presented for the years
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, are pre-merger and are not comparable with the results presented in 2017, 2018 or
2019. Data presented for the year ended December 31, 2017, includes the impact of the Merger from May 30, 2017,
through the end of the year.
Net income attributable to JHG
$ 427.6 $ 523.8 $ 655.5 $ 189.0 $ 329.8
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income:
Total revenues
Operating expenses
Operating income
Operating margin
Interest expense (1)
Investment gains (losses), net (2)
Other non-operating income (expenses), net
Income tax benefit (provision) (3)
Net income
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests (4)
Earnings per share attributable to JHG common
Weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding (in
Dividends declared and paid per share:
shareholders:
Diluted
millions)
GBP
USD
Total assets
Consolidated balance sheet (as of December 31):
Long-term debt (including current portion)
Deferred income taxes, net
Other non-current liabilities
Redeemable noncontrolling interests (5)
Cash flow:
Operating data (in billions):
Ending AUM
Average AUM
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(dollars in millions, except per share data and operating data)
$ 2,192.4 $ 2,306.4 $ 1,818.3 $ 1,018.2 $ 1,177.7
1,651.5
1,656.6
1,376.0
540.9
649.8
442.3
786.1
232.1
860.4
317.3
24.7%
28.2%
24.3%
22.8% 26.9%
(15.1)
34.2
23.5
(15.7)
(40.9)
68.6
(137.8)
(162.2)
445.7
(18.1)
499.6
24.2
(11.9)
18.0
(1.0)
211.0
658.4
(2.9)
(6.6)
(20.1)
(11.7)
(1.9)
(34.6)
39.7
0.6
(6.1)
177.3
331.4
11.7
(1.6)
$
2.21 $
2.61 $
3.93 $
1.66 $
2.78
188.6
195.9
162.3
1,111.1 1,154.5
—
—
£0.0915
£0.1040 £0.0950
$
1.44 $
1.40 $
0.64 $
— $
—
$ 7,621.7 $ 6,911.9 $ 7,272.7 $ 2,433.4 $ 2,835.2
$ 316.2 $ 319.1 $ 379.2 $
— $ 220.9
$ 729.1 $ 729.9 $ 752.6 $
$ 158.8 $
79.2 $
99.6 $
70.7 $
39.0 $
$ 677.9 $ 136.1 $ 190.3 $ 158.0 $
86.3
49.4
82.9
$ 374.8 $ 328.5 $ 370.8 $ 124.7 $ 135.6
$ 357.1 $ 367.7 $ 262.1 $ 129.4 $ 127.7
Cash flows provided by operating activities
$ 463.2 $ 670.8 $ 444.1 $ 235.1 $ 388.9
(1) We repaid our 0.750% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Convertible Notes”) in July 2018, causing
interest expense to decrease in 2019 compared to 2018. We repaid our 7.25% Senior Notes due 2016 (the “2016
Senior Notes”) in March 2016, causing interest expense to decrease in 2016 compared to 2015.
(2) We sold our share in a joint venture in 2015, and an $18.9 million gain was recognized.
(3) Our income tax provision in 2015 was extraordinarily low primarily due to one-off tax benefits, which included a
reduction in the UK tax rate, tax benefits arising from the exercise of stock-based compensation awards and the
settlement of tax positions with the UK tax authorities. Our income tax provision in 2017 includes a one-time tax
benefit of $340.7 million related to new U.S. tax legislation.
(4) Our net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily relate to our seeded investment products and
will fluctuate based on the market value of the investments.
(5) Changes in redeemable noncontrolling interest are due to changes in ownership and the market value of seed capital
investments.
ITEM 7.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
Business Overview
We are an independent global asset manager, specializing in active investment across all major asset classes. We actively
manage a broad range of investment products for institutional and retail investors across five capabilities: Equities, Fixed
Income, Quantitative Equities, Multi-Asset and Alternatives.
On May 30, 2017, JHG completed a merger of equals with JCG (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, JCG and its
consolidated subsidiaries became subsidiaries of JHG.
Segment Considerations
We are a global asset manager and manage a range of investment products, operating across various product lines,
distribution channels and geographic regions. However, information is reported to the chief operating decision-maker,
the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), on an aggregated basis. Strategic and financial management decisions are
determined centrally by the CEO and, on this basis, we operate as a single segment investment management business.
Revenue
Revenue primarily consists of management fees and performance fees. Management fees are generally based upon a
percentage of the market value of our AUM and are calculated using either the daily, month-end or quarter-end average
asset balance in accordance with contractual agreements. Accordingly, fluctuations in the financial markets have a direct
effect on our operating results. Additionally, our AUM may outperform or underperform the financial markets and
therefore may fluctuate in varying degrees from that of the general market.
Performance fees are specified in certain fund and client contracts and are based on investment performance either on an
absolute basis or compared to an established index over a specified period of time. This is often subject to a hurdle rate.
Performance fees are recognized at the end of the contractual period (typically monthly, quarterly or annually) if the
stated performance criteria are achieved. Certain fund and client contracts allow for negative performance fees where
there is underperformance against the relevant index.
2019 SUMMARY
2019 Highlights
●
Investment performance strengthened during 2019, with 76% and 77% of our AUM outperforming benchmarks
on a three- and five-year basis, respectively, as of December 31, 2019.
● AUM increased to $374.8 billion, up 14% from the year ended December 31, 2018, due to positive markets,
partially offset by net outflows.
● 2019 diluted earnings per share was $2.21, or $2.47 on an adjusted basis. Refer to the Non-GAAP Financial
Measures section for information on adjusted non-GAAP figures.
30
31
Table of Contents Table of Contents
● During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the share buyback program and acquired 9.4 million
shares of our common stock for $199.9 million.
Financial Summary
Results are reported on a U.S. GAAP basis. Adjusted non-GAAP figures are presented in the Non-GAAP Financial
Measures section.
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $2,192.4 million, a decrease of $114.0 million, or (5%), from
December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in management fees due to a decline in average
AUM and lower management fee margins during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2018.
Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $1,651.5 million, a decrease of $5.1 million, or
less than (1%), compared to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was due to
numerous items discussed in Results of Operations.
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $540.9 million, a decrease of $108.9 million, or (17%),
compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Our operating margin was 24.7% in 2019 compared to 28.2% in 2018.
Net income attributable to JHG for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $427.6 million, a decrease of $96.2 million,
or (18%), compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, due to the factors impacting revenue and operating expense
discussed above. In addition, investment gains (losses), net moved favorably by $75.1 million in 2019 compared to 2018
primarily due to fair value adjustments in relation to our seeded investment products and derivative instruments
recognized in 2019. This was partially offset by a decline in other non-operating income (expense), net of $45.1 million
due to fair value adjustments related to the Dai-ichi options and a gain on the sale of our back-office and middle-office
functions in the U.S., both of which benefited other non-operating income (expenses), net during the year ended
December 31, 2018. Also contributing to the decline in other non-operating income (expense), net was unfavorable
foreign currency translation of $20.4 million. These decreases in other non-operating income (expenses), net were
partially offset by a $20.0 million contingent consideration adjustment associated with Geneva Capital Management
LLC (“Geneva”) due to an updated forecast recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Investment Performance of Assets Under Management
The following table is a summary of our investment performance as of December 31, 2019:
Percentage of AUM outperforming benchmark
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total Group
Assets Under Management
1 year
3 years
5 years
67 %
82 %
37 %
91 %
94 %
69 %
76 %
84 %
40 %
91 %
99 %
76 %
80 %
92 %
16 %
93 %
100 %
77 %
Our AUM as of December 31, 2019, was $374.8 billion, an increase of $46.3 billion, or 14%, from December 31, 2018,
driven primarily by favorable markets of $71.7 billion, partially offset by net redemptions of $27.4 billion.
Our non-U.S. dollar (“USD”) AUM is primarily denominated in Great British pounds (“GBP”), euros (“EUR”) and
Australian dollars (“AUD”). During the year ended December 31, 2019, the USD weakened against the GBP and
strengthened against the EUR and the AUD, resulting in a $2.0 billion increase to AUM. As of December 31, 2019,
approximately 31% of our AUM was non-USD-denominated, resulting in a net favorable currency effect, particularly in
products exposed to GBP.
32
Table of Contents
Financial Summary
Measures section.
December 31, 2018.
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $2,192.4 million, a decrease of $114.0 million, or (5%), from
December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in management fees due to a decline in average
AUM and lower management fee margins during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended
Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019, were $1,651.5 million, a decrease of $5.1 million, or
less than (1%), compared to operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was due to
numerous items discussed in Results of Operations.
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $540.9 million, a decrease of $108.9 million, or (17%),
compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. Our operating margin was 24.7% in 2019 compared to 28.2% in 2018.
Net income attributable to JHG for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $427.6 million, a decrease of $96.2 million,
or (18%), compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, due to the factors impacting revenue and operating expense
discussed above. In addition, investment gains (losses), net moved favorably by $75.1 million in 2019 compared to 2018
primarily due to fair value adjustments in relation to our seeded investment products and derivative instruments
recognized in 2019. This was partially offset by a decline in other non-operating income (expense), net of $45.1 million
due to fair value adjustments related to the Dai-ichi options and a gain on the sale of our back-office and middle-office
functions in the U.S., both of which benefited other non-operating income (expenses), net during the year ended
December 31, 2018. Also contributing to the decline in other non-operating income (expense), net was unfavorable
foreign currency translation of $20.4 million. These decreases in other non-operating income (expenses), net were
partially offset by a $20.0 million contingent consideration adjustment associated with Geneva Capital Management
LLC (“Geneva”) due to an updated forecast recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Investment Performance of Assets Under Management
The following table is a summary of our investment performance as of December 31, 2019:
Percentage of AUM outperforming benchmark
1 year
3 years
5 years
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total Group
Assets Under Management
67 %
82 %
37 %
91 %
94 %
69 %
76 %
84 %
40 %
91 %
99 %
76 %
80 %
92 %
16 %
93 %
100 %
77 %
Our AUM as of December 31, 2019, was $374.8 billion, an increase of $46.3 billion, or 14%, from December 31, 2018,
driven primarily by favorable markets of $71.7 billion, partially offset by net redemptions of $27.4 billion.
Our non-U.S. dollar (“USD”) AUM is primarily denominated in Great British pounds (“GBP”), euros (“EUR”) and
Australian dollars (“AUD”). During the year ended December 31, 2019, the USD weakened against the GBP and
strengthened against the EUR and the AUD, resulting in a $2.0 billion increase to AUM. As of December 31, 2019,
approximately 31% of our AUM was non-USD-denominated, resulting in a net favorable currency effect, particularly in
products exposed to GBP.
● During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the share buyback program and acquired 9.4 million
shares of our common stock for $199.9 million.
VelocityShares ETNs and certain index products are not included within AUM as we are not the named adviser or
subadviser to ETNs or index products. VelocityShares ETN assets totaled $3.1 billion and $2.2 billion as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. VelocityShares index product assets not included within AUM totaled $3.0
billion and $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Results are reported on a U.S. GAAP basis. Adjusted non-GAAP figures are presented in the Non-GAAP Financial
Our AUM and flows by capability for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were as follows (in billions):
Closing AUM
December 31,
2018
Net sales
Redemptions(1) (redemptions) Markets
Sales
FX(2)
Reclassification
2019
Closing AUM
December 31,
By capability
$
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative
Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total
$
167.6 $ 29.2 $
72.4
22.1
(41.4) $
(26.0)
(12.2) $ 47.8 $
(3.9)
5.4
0.8 $
0.9
— $
—
204.0
74.8
44.3
30.2
14.0
328.5 $ 65.2 $
1.5
9.4
3.0
(12.3)
(6.3)
(6.6)
(92.6) $
(10.8)
3.1
(3.6)
(27.4) $ 71.7 $
11.6
6.4
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.0 $
—
—
—
— $
45.2
39.8
11.0
374.8
Closing AUM
December 31,
2017
Sales
Net sales
Closing AUM
December 31,
Redemptions(1) (redemptions) Markets FX(2)
Reclassification
2018
By capability
$
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative
Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total
$
189.7 $ 33.8 $
80.1
21.0
(43.9) $
(24.8)
(10.1) $ (10.4) $
(3.8)
(0.8)
(3.3) $
(3.6)
1.7 $
0.5
167.6
72.4
49.9
31.6
19.5
370.8 $ 71.1 $
3.7
7.6
5.0
(5.3)
(5.8)
(9.4)
(89.2)
$
(1.6)
1.8
(4.4)
(18.1) $ (15.7) $
(3.8)
(0.5)
(0.2)
(0.2)
(0.5)
(0.9)
(8.5) $
—
(2.2)
—
— $
44.3
30.2
14.0
328.5
Closing AUM
Dec. 31,
2016 (3)
Sales
Redemptions(1) (redemptions) Markets FX(2)
disposals
Net sales
Acquisitions &
Dec. 31,
2017
Closing AUM
By capability
$
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative
Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total
$
63.6 $ 32.6 $
34.7
17.2
(32.6) $
(15.7)
— $ 21.2 $
1.5
1.5
5.2 $
3.8
99.7 $
38.6
189.7
80.1
—
9.0
17.4
124.7 $ 61.9 $
1.6
2.8
7.7
(5.2)
(3.8)
(7.6)
(64.9) $
5.4
(3.6)
2.7
(1.0)
0.1
0.9
(3.0) $ 31.7 $ 11.6 $
0.1
0.9
1.6
48.0
20.0
(0.5)
205.8 $
49.9
31.6
19.5
370.8
(1) Redemptions include the impact of client transfers, which could cause a positive balance on occasion.
(2) FX reflects movements in AUM resulting from changes in foreign currency rates as non-USD denominated AUM is
translated into USD.
(3) AUM as of December 31, 2016, has been reclassified between capabilities following the completion of the Merger.
32
33
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Closing Assets Under Management
The following table presents our closing AUM, split by client type and client location, as of December 31, 2019 (in
billions):
By client type
Intermediary
Institutional
Self-directed
Total
By client location
North America
EMEA & LatAm
Asia-Pacific
Total
Closing AUM
December 31, 2019
172.7
$
132.1
70.0
374.8
$
Closing AUM
December 31, 2019
208.8
$
111.6
54.4
374.8
$
Valuation of Assets Under Management
The fair value of our AUM is based on the value of the underlying cash and investment securities of our funds, trusts and
segregated mandates. A significant proportion of these securities is listed or quoted on a recognized securities exchange
or market and is regularly traded thereon; these investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted market prices. Other
investments, including over the counter derivative contracts (which are dealt in or through a clearing firm, exchanges or
financial institutions) will be valued by reference to the most recent official settlement price quoted by the appointed
market vendor, and in the event no price is available from this source, a broker quotation may be used. Physical property
held is valued monthly by a specialist independent appraiser.
When a readily ascertainable market value does not exist for an investment, the fair value is calculated using a variety of
methodologies, including the expected cash flows of its underlying net asset base, taking into account applicable
discount rates and other factors; comparable securities or relevant indices; recent financing rounds; revenue multiples; or
a combination thereof. Judgment is used to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and to determine
fair values when markets have become inactive. The Fair Value Pricing Committee is responsible for determining or
approving these unquoted prices, which are reported to those charged with governance of the funds and trusts. For funds
that invest in markets that are closed at their valuation point, an assessment is made daily to determine whether a fair
value pricing adjustment is required to the fund’s valuation. This may be due to significant market movements in other
correlated open markets, scheduled market closures or unscheduled market closures as a result of natural disaster or
government intervention.
Third-party administrators hold a key role in the collection and validation of prices used in the valuation of the
securities. Daily price validation is completed using techniques such as day-on-day tolerance movements, invariant
prices, excessive movement checks and intra-vendor tolerance checks. Our data management team performs oversight of
this process and completes annual due diligence on the processes of third parties.
In other cases, we and the sub-administrators perform a number of procedures to validate the pricing received from third-
party providers. For actively traded equity and fixed income securities, prices are received daily from both a primary and
secondary vendor. Prices from the primary and secondary vendors are compared to identify any discrepancies. In the
event of a discrepancy, a price challenge may be issued to both vendors. Securities with significant day-to-day price
changes require additional research, which may include a review of all news pertaining to the issue and issuer, and any
corporate actions. All fixed income prices are reviewed by our fixed income trading desk to incorporate market activity
information available to our traders. In the event the traders have received price indications from market makers for a
particular issue, this information is transmitted to the pricing vendors.
34
Table of Contents
Closing Assets Under Management
billions):
By client type
Intermediary
Institutional
Self-directed
Total
By client location
North America
EMEA & LatAm
Asia-Pacific
Total
Closing AUM
December 31, 2019
$
$
$
$
172.7
132.1
70.0
374.8
208.8
111.6
54.4
374.8
Closing AUM
December 31, 2019
Valuation of Assets Under Management
The fair value of our AUM is based on the value of the underlying cash and investment securities of our funds, trusts and
segregated mandates. A significant proportion of these securities is listed or quoted on a recognized securities exchange
or market and is regularly traded thereon; these investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted market prices. Other
investments, including over the counter derivative contracts (which are dealt in or through a clearing firm, exchanges or
financial institutions) will be valued by reference to the most recent official settlement price quoted by the appointed
market vendor, and in the event no price is available from this source, a broker quotation may be used. Physical property
held is valued monthly by a specialist independent appraiser.
When a readily ascertainable market value does not exist for an investment, the fair value is calculated using a variety of
methodologies, including the expected cash flows of its underlying net asset base, taking into account applicable
discount rates and other factors; comparable securities or relevant indices; recent financing rounds; revenue multiples; or
a combination thereof. Judgment is used to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive and to determine
fair values when markets have become inactive. The Fair Value Pricing Committee is responsible for determining or
approving these unquoted prices, which are reported to those charged with governance of the funds and trusts. For funds
that invest in markets that are closed at their valuation point, an assessment is made daily to determine whether a fair
value pricing adjustment is required to the fund’s valuation. This may be due to significant market movements in other
correlated open markets, scheduled market closures or unscheduled market closures as a result of natural disaster or
government intervention.
Third-party administrators hold a key role in the collection and validation of prices used in the valuation of the
securities. Daily price validation is completed using techniques such as day-on-day tolerance movements, invariant
prices, excessive movement checks and intra-vendor tolerance checks. Our data management team performs oversight of
this process and completes annual due diligence on the processes of third parties.
In other cases, we and the sub-administrators perform a number of procedures to validate the pricing received from third-
party providers. For actively traded equity and fixed income securities, prices are received daily from both a primary and
secondary vendor. Prices from the primary and secondary vendors are compared to identify any discrepancies. In the
event of a discrepancy, a price challenge may be issued to both vendors. Securities with significant day-to-day price
changes require additional research, which may include a review of all news pertaining to the issue and issuer, and any
corporate actions. All fixed income prices are reviewed by our fixed income trading desk to incorporate market activity
information available to our traders. In the event the traders have received price indications from market makers for a
particular issue, this information is transmitted to the pricing vendors.
The following table presents our closing AUM, split by client type and client location, as of December 31, 2019 (in
Results of Operations
We leverage the expertise of our fund management teams across the business to cross-invest assets and create value for
our clients. Where cross investment occurs, assets and flows are identified, and the duplication is removed.
The year ended December 31, 2017, includes seven months (June through December) of JCG post-merger activity, while
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, include JCG activity for all months in the period. This scenario creates
significant variances throughout the Results of Operations when comparing activity for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2019, to the same period in 2017. For purposes of the Results of Operations discussions below, the variances
due to this scenario are separately identified and disclosed as “the inclusion of five additional months of JCG.”
Foreign currency translation impacts our Results of Operations section. The translation of GBP to USD is the primary
driver of foreign currency translation in expenses. While the GBP strengthened against the USD as of December 31,
2019, compared to December 31, 2018, the conversion rate was very volatile in 2019. The impact to our operating
expenses is discussed in the Operating Expenses section below when the impact is meaningful. Revenue is also impacted
by foreign currency translation, but the impact is generally determined by the primary currency of the fund.
Revenue
Revenue (in millions):
Management fees
Performance fees
Shareowner servicing fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Management fees
Year ended December 31,
2018
2019
2017
2019 vs.
2018
2018 vs.
2017
$ 1,792.3 $ 1,947.4 $ 1,480.9
103.9
87.3
146.2
$ 2,192.4 $ 2,306.4 $ 1,818.3
7.1
154.2
197.7
17.6
185.4
197.1
(8) %
148 %
20 %
(0) %
(5) %
32 %
(93) %
77 %
35 %
27 %
Management fees decreased by $155.1 million, or (8%), during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2018. A decline in average AUM and lower management fee margins contributed $113.1 million
and $44.2 million, respectively, to the decrease in management fees year over year. Our SICAV products, which have
higher average net management fee margins, were the biggest driver of the decline in average AUM representing
approximately $7.0 billion of the decrease.
Management fees increased by $466.5 million, or 32%, during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2017. The inclusion of five additional months of JCG management fees of $437.2 million was the
primary driver of the increase. Higher average AUM due to favorable markets and foreign currency translation also
increased management fees by $59.1 million and $22.8 million, respectively. These increases were partially offset by net
outflows causing a decrease in management fees during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Average net management fee margins, by capability, consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018:
Average net management fee margin (bps):
Equities
Fixed Income
Quantitative Equities
Multi-Asset
Alternatives
Total
Year ended December 31,
2019 vs.
2019
2018
2018
56.0
25.7
20.4
50.0
68.6
44.9
58.6
27.9
22.1
47.1
72.9
46.9
(4) %
(8) %
(8) %
6 %
(6) %
(4) %
34
35
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Total average net management fee margins decreased by 2 bps, or (4%), from 2018 to 2019. Net management fee
margins were lower in 2019 primarily due to a product mix shift toward lower yielding products.
Performance fees
Performance fees are derived across a number of product ranges. Pooled fund and segregated mandate performance fees
are recognized on a quarterly or annual basis, while mutual fund performance fees are recognized on a monthly basis.
Performance fees by product type consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in
millions):
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
2019 vs.
2018
2018 vs.
2017
Performance fees (in millions):
SICAVs
UK OEICs and unit trusts
Offshore absolute return
Segregated mandates
Investment trusts
Mutual funds
Other
Total performance fees
* n/m — Not meaningful
$
$
1.7 $
0.3
0.4
30.6
—
(15.4)
—
17.6 $
5.3 $
4.4
3.4
24.8
6.9
(37.7)
—
7.1 $
49.1
22.8
8.2
31.0
11.8
(19.5)
0.5
103.9
(68) %
(93) %
(88) %
23 %
(100) %
(59) %
n/m *
148 %
(89) %
(81) %
(59) %
(20) %
(42) %
93 %
(100) %
(93) %
For the year ended December 31, 2019, performance fees increased $10.5 million, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2018. This increase was primarily due to a $22.5 million increase in mutual fund performance fees,
partially offset by a decrease in SICAVs, UK OEICs and unit trusts and offshore absolute return performance fees.
Performance fees decreased by $96.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in SICAV and UK OEICs and unit trusts
performance fees from a decline in performance of several large European equity and absolute return products as well as
a decrease in segregated mandates and investment trusts due to fewer annual performance fee crystallizations. The
inclusion of five additional months of JCG net performance fees also contributed $9.2 million to the decrease.
36
Table of Contents
Total average net management fee margins decreased by 2 bps, or (4%), from 2018 to 2019. Net management fee
margins were lower in 2019 primarily due to a product mix shift toward lower yielding products.
Performance fees are derived across a number of product ranges. Pooled fund and segregated mandate performance fees
are recognized on a quarterly or annual basis, while mutual fund performance fees are recognized on a monthly basis.
Performance fees by product type consisted of the following for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in
Performance fees
millions):
Performance fees (in millions):
SICAVs
UK OEICs and unit trusts
Offshore absolute return
Segregated mandates
Investment trusts
Mutual funds
Other
* n/m — Not meaningful
Year ended December 31,
2019 vs.
2018 vs.
2019
2018
2017
2018
2017
$
1.7 $
5.3 $
0.3
0.4
30.6
—
(15.4)
—
4.4
3.4
24.8
6.9
(37.7)
—
49.1
22.8
8.2
31.0
11.8
(19.5)
0.5
(68) %
(93) %
(88) %
23 %
(100) %
(59) %
n/m *
148 %
(89) %
(81) %
(59) %
(20) %
(42) %
93 %
(100) %
(93) %
Total performance fees
$
17.6 $
7.1 $
103.9
For the year ended December 31, 2019, performance fees increased $10.5 million, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2018. This increase was primarily due to a $22.5 million increase in mutual fund performance fees,
partially offset by a decrease in SICAVs, UK OEICs and unit trusts and offshore absolute return performance fees.
Performance fees decreased by $96.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in SICAV and UK OEICs and unit trusts
performance fees from a decline in performance of several large European equity and absolute return products as well as
a decrease in segregated mandates and investment trusts due to fewer annual performance fee crystallizations. The
inclusion of five additional months of JCG net performance fees also contributed $9.2 million to the decrease.
The following table outlines performance fees by product type and includes information on fees earned, number of funds
generating performance fees, AUM generating performance fees, number of funds eligible to earn performance fees,
AUM with an un-crystallized performance fee, performance fee participation rate, performance fee frequency and
performance fee methodology (dollars in millions, except where noted):
Performance Fees
Year ended December 31, 2019
Year ended December 31, 2018
Year ended December 31, 2017
Number of funds generating performance fees
Year ended December 31, 2019(1)
Year ended December 31, 2018(1)
Year ended December 31, 2017(1)
Segregated
Mandates /
Managed
CDO / Private
Equity /
Property /
Other
Offshore
Absolute
Return
Funds
Investment U.S. Mutual
Trusts
Funds
UK OEICs &
Unit Trusts
SICAVs
$
$
$
0.3 $
4.4 $
22.8 $
1.7 $
5.3 $
49.2 $
0.4 $
3.4 $
8.2 $
30.6 $
24.8 $
31.4 $
— $
6.9 $
11.8 $
(15.4)
(37.7)
(19.5)
2
3
3
12
12
18
7
6
24
42
44
72
—
2
5
17
17
13
AUM generating performance fees (in billions)
AUM at December 31, 2019 generating FY19 performance
fees
AUM at December 31, 2018 generating FY18 performance
fees
AUM at December 31, 2017 generating FY17 performance
fees
$
$
$
Number of funds eligible to earn performance fees
As of December 31, 2019
As of December 31, 2018
As of December 31, 2017
Un-crystallized performance fees (in billions)
AUM at December 31, 2019 with an un-crystallized
performance fee at December 31, 2019, vesting in 2020 (2)
AUM at December 31, 2018 with an un-crystallized
performance fee at December 31, 2018, vesting in 2019 (2)
AUM at December 31, 2017 with an un-crystallized
performance fee at December 31, 2017, vesting in 2018 (2)
$
$
$
— $
2.9 $
2.5
4.3
$
$
0.6
$
30.1 $
— $
48.3
0.4 $
20.6 $
1.3 $
39.1
3.1 $
11.7 $
1.9 $
36.3 $
2.8 $
43.0
3
4
4
26
26
25
— $
2.4 $
— $
— $
3.5 $
11.9 $
9
10
21
0.1
—
0.3
66
87
76
n/a $
n/a $
n/a $
4
6
8
1.2
—
1.8
17
17
19
n/a
n/a
n/a
Performance fee participation rate percentage (3)
15%-20%
10%-20%
10%-20%
5%-28%
15%
+/−0.15%
Performance fee frequency
Quarterly
Annually
and
Quarterly
Annually
Performance fee methodology (4)
Relative/Absolute
plus HWM
Relative
plus HWM
Absolute plus
HWM
Quarterly,
Semi-
Annually
and
Annually
Bespoke
Annually
Monthly
Relative
plus HWM
Relative
plus HWM
(1) For offshore absolute return funds, this excludes funds earning a performance fee on redemption and only includes
those with a period-end crystallization date.
(2) Reflects the total AUM of all funds with a performance fee opportunity at any point in the relevant year.
(3) Participation rate related to non-U.S mutual fund products reflects our share of outperformance. Participation rate
related to U.S mutual funds represents an adjustment to the management fee.
(4) Relative performance is measured versus applicable benchmarks and is subject to a high water mark (“HWM”) for
relevant funds.
Shareowner servicing fees
Shareowner servicing fees are primarily composed of U.S. mutual fund servicing fees. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, shareowner servicing fees increased $31.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2018,
primarily due to correcting the presentation of certain servicing fees and expenses. The presentation for the year ended
36
37
Table of Contents Table of Contents
December 31, 2019, reflects these fees on a gross basis in shareowner servicing fees on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, while in 2018 the fees were netted in distribution expenses. The correction is offset in
distribution expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, shareowner servicing fees increased $66.9 million compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017, primarily due to the inclusion of five additional months of JCG shareowner servicing fees of $64.2
million and higher AUM.
Other revenue
Other revenue is primarily composed of VelocityShares ETN fees, 12b-1 distribution fees, general administration
charges and other fee revenue. Other revenue decreased by $0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2019,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no significant items driving the decrease in other revenue.
Other revenue increased by $51.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017, with the largest driver being the inclusion of five additional months of JCG distribution fees and
other fee revenue of $49.9 million.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses (in millions):
Employee compensation and benefits
Long-term incentive plans
Distribution expenses
Investment administration
Marketing
General, administrative and occupancy
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating expenses
Employee compensation and benefits
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
602.5 $
184.3
444.3
47.9
31.1
260.8
80.6
543.3
150.8
351.9
43.8
31.2
202.2
52.8
$ 1,651.5 $ 1,656.6 $ 1,376.0
613.0 $
188.6
446.7
46.9
37.9
253.7
69.8
2019 vs.
2018
2018 vs.
2017
(2) %
(2) %
(1) %
2 %
(18) %
3 %
15 %
(0) %
13 %
25 %
27 %
7 %
21 %
25 %
32 %
20 %
During the year ended December 31, 2019, employee compensation and benefits decreased $10.5 million compared to
the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a lower bonus pool and other variable
compensation of $14.3 million. Lower headcount and favorable foreign currency translation also contributed $5.7
million and $5.3 million, respectively, to the decrease in employee compensation and benefits. These decreases were
partially offset by increases in fixed staff compensation due to temporary staffing charges and project costs of $8.8
million and annual base-pay increases of $6.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, employee compensation and benefits increased $69.7 million compared to
the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of five additional months of JCG,
which contributed $131.6 million. Foreign currency translation also contributed $6.8 million to the increase. These
increases were partially offset by lower redundancy charges, lower performance fee variable compensation, lower cash
bonuses and one-time cash awards in lieu of long-term incentive plan awards, which reduced costs by $32.3 million,
$17.8 million, $18.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
Long-term incentive plans
Long-term incentive plans decreased by $4.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2018, primarily driven by decreases of $7.5 million due to the roll-off of vested awards exceeding
new awards and favorable foreign currency translation of $4.1 million. These decreases were partially offset by $6.5
million in fair value adjustments related to mutual fund awards and certain Intech long-term incentive awards during the
year ended December 31, 2019.
38
Table of Contents
December 31, 2019, reflects these fees on a gross basis in shareowner servicing fees on the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, while in 2018 the fees were netted in distribution expenses. The correction is offset in
distribution expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, shareowner servicing fees increased $66.9 million compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017, primarily due to the inclusion of five additional months of JCG shareowner servicing fees of $64.2
million and higher AUM.
Other revenue
Other revenue is primarily composed of VelocityShares ETN fees, 12b-1 distribution fees, general administration
charges and other fee revenue. Other revenue decreased by $0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2019,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no significant items driving the decrease in other revenue.
Other revenue increased by $51.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017, with the largest driver being the inclusion of five additional months of JCG distribution fees and
other fee revenue of $49.9 million.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses (in millions):
Employee compensation and benefits
Long-term incentive plans
Distribution expenses
Investment administration
Marketing
General, administrative and occupancy
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating expenses
Employee compensation and benefits
$
602.5 $
613.0 $
184.3
444.3
47.9
31.1
260.8
80.6
188.6
446.7
46.9
37.9
253.7
69.8
543.3
150.8
351.9
43.8
31.2
202.2
52.8
(2) %
(2) %
(1) %
2 %
(18) %
3 %
15 %
(0) %
13 %
25 %
27 %
7 %
21 %
25 %
32 %
20 %
$ 1,651.5 $ 1,656.6 $ 1,376.0
During the year ended December 31, 2019, employee compensation and benefits decreased $10.5 million compared to
the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a lower bonus pool and other variable
compensation of $14.3 million. Lower headcount and favorable foreign currency translation also contributed $5.7
million and $5.3 million, respectively, to the decrease in employee compensation and benefits. These decreases were
partially offset by increases in fixed staff compensation due to temporary staffing charges and project costs of $8.8
million and annual base-pay increases of $6.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, employee compensation and benefits increased $69.7 million compared to
the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of five additional months of JCG,
which contributed $131.6 million. Foreign currency translation also contributed $6.8 million to the increase. These
increases were partially offset by lower redundancy charges, lower performance fee variable compensation, lower cash
bonuses and one-time cash awards in lieu of long-term incentive plan awards, which reduced costs by $32.3 million,
$17.8 million, $18.5 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
Long-term incentive plans
Long-term incentive plans decreased by $4.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2018, primarily driven by decreases of $7.5 million due to the roll-off of vested awards exceeding
new awards and favorable foreign currency translation of $4.1 million. These decreases were partially offset by $6.5
million in fair value adjustments related to mutual fund awards and certain Intech long-term incentive awards during the
year ended December 31, 2019.
Long-term incentive plans increased $37.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of five additional months of JCG long-
term incentive plans expenses of $35.3 million and a $39.2 million increase due to new grants. Unfavorable foreign
currency translation of $1.8 million also contributed to the increase during the year ended December 31, 2018. These
increases were partially offset by a $26.2 million decrease from the vesting of awards granted in previous years and a
$10.5 million decrease due to fair value adjustments related to mutual fund awards.
Distribution expenses
Distribution expenses are paid to financial intermediaries for the distribution of JHG’s retail investment products and are
typically calculated based on the amount of the intermediary-sourced AUM. Distribution expenses decreased $2.4
million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. A decline in average
AUM and lower management fee margins contributed $31.7 million and $6.4 million to the decrease, respectively.
These decreases were partially offset by a $31.9 million increase due to correcting the presentation of certain servicing
fees and expenses as discussed above in shareowner servicing fees.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, distribution expenses increased by $94.8 million, with the inclusion of five
additional months of JCG distribution expenses of $104.9 million as the primary driver of the increase. New revenue
sharing agreements also contributed $1.7 million to the increase. The remaining change for the year ended December 31,
2018, was due to the UK OEIC and SICAV product mix.
Year ended December 31,
2019 vs.
2018 vs.
2019
2018
2017
2018
2017
Investment administration
Investment administration expenses, which represent back-office operations (including fund administration and fund
accounting), increased $1.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended December
31, 2018. There were no significant items driving the increase in investment administration expenses.
Investment administration expenses increased $3.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the
year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was mostly due to $5.7 million in expenses related to transitioning JHG’s
back-office, middle-office and custody functions to BNP Paribas Securities Services (“BNP Paribas”).
Marketing
During the year ended December 31, 2019, marketing expenses decreased $6.8 million, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by lower marketing material and advertising costs during 2019.
Marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018, increased $6.7 million, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of five additional months of JCG marketing
expenses of $8.0 million.
General, administrative and occupancy
General, administrative and occupancy expenses increased $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to increases of $10.2 million in rent
expense resulting from charges related to the early exit of leased office space in the UK, $4.7 million in legal and
professional consultancy fees, $3.0 million in software licensing costs and $2.4 million in market data costs during the
year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. These increases were partially offset by
the initial outcome of the Richard Pease v. Henderson Administration Limited court case, which increased 2018 general,
administrative and occupancy expenses by $12.2 million. We appealed the court case in 2019 and the outcome of the
appeal favorably impacted general, administrative and occupancy expenses in 2019 by $5.5 million.
General, administrative and occupancy expenses increased $51.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily driven by the inclusion of five additional
months of JCG general, administrative and occupancy expenses of $43.7 million. The outcome of a court case and
38
39
Table of Contents Table of Contents
research costs related to MiFID II increased expenses during the year ended December 31, 2018, by $12.2 million and
$16.9 million, respectively. In addition, a $7.6 million increase in irrecoverable sales tax primarily due to a $6.9 million
credit during the year ended December 31, 2017, a $5.2 million increase in legal and other professional fees, and
unfavorable foreign currency translation of $2.0 million contributed to the year-over-year increase. These increases were
partially offset by a $33.0 million decrease of deal and integration costs (excluding JCG) related to the Merger.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $10.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to an $18.0 million impairment related to certain
mutual fund investment management agreements recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019, partially offset
by the 2018 impairment discussed below.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $17.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million impairment related to Gartmore
investment management contracts classified as intangible assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in addition to the
inclusion of five additional months of JCG amortization of intangibles recognized as a result of the Merger. Refer to
Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional
information on the impairment assessment.
Non-Operating Income and Expenses
Non-operating income and expenses (in millions):
Interest expense
Investment gains (losses), net
Other non-operating income, net
Income tax provision
* n/m — Not meaningful.
Interest expense
Year ended December 31,
2018
2019
2017
2019 vs.
2018
2018 vs.
2017
$
(15.1) $
34.2
23.5
(137.8)
(15.7) $
(40.9)
68.6
(162.2)
(11.9)
18.0
(1.0)
211.0
(4) %
(184) %
(66) %
(15) %
32 %
327 %
n/m *
177 %
Interest expense decreased $0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to interest associated with the 2018 Convertible Notes which
matured and were settled in 2018.
Interest expense increased by $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to interest on JCG’s 4.875% Senior Notes due 2025 (“2025 Senior
Notes”), which became an obligation of JHG as a result of the Merger.
40
Table of Contents
2019
2017
2019 vs.
2018
2018 vs.
2017
Year ended December 31,
2018
Investment gains (losses), net
The components of investment gains (losses), net for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were as
follows (in millions):
research costs related to MiFID II increased expenses during the year ended December 31, 2018, by $12.2 million and
$16.9 million, respectively. In addition, a $7.6 million increase in irrecoverable sales tax primarily due to a $6.9 million
credit during the year ended December 31, 2017, a $5.2 million increase in legal and other professional fees, and
unfavorable foreign currency translation of $2.0 million contributed to the year-over-year increase. These increases were
partially offset by a $33.0 million decrease of deal and integration costs (excluding JCG) related to the Merger.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased $10.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to an $18.0 million impairment related to certain
mutual fund investment management agreements recognized during the year ended December 31, 2019, partially offset
by the 2018 impairment discussed below.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $17.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $7.2 million impairment related to Gartmore
investment management contracts classified as intangible assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in addition to the
inclusion of five additional months of JCG amortization of intangibles recognized as a result of the Merger. Refer to
Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 7 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional
information on the impairment assessment.
Non-Operating Income and Expenses
Year ended December 31,
2019 vs.
2018 vs.
2019
2018
2017
2018
2017
$
(15.1) $
(15.7) $
(11.9)
34.2
23.5
(40.9)
68.6
(137.8)
(162.2)
18.0
(1.0)
211.0
(4) %
(184) %
(66) %
(15) %
32 %
327 %
n/m *
177 %
Interest expense
Investment gains (losses), net
Other non-operating income, net
Income tax provision
* n/m — Not meaningful.
Interest expense
Interest expense decreased $0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to interest associated with the 2018 Convertible Notes which
matured and were settled in 2018.
Interest expense increased by $3.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to interest on JCG’s 4.875% Senior Notes due 2025 (“2025 Senior
Notes”), which became an obligation of JHG as a result of the Merger.
Investment gains (losses), net (in millions):
Seeded investment products and derivatives, net
Gain on sale of Volantis
Other
Investment gains (losses), net
* n/m — Not meaningful.
$
$
20.7 $
—
13.5
34.2 $
(42.6) $
—
1.7
(40.9) $
4.0
10.2
3.8
18.0
(149) %
n/m *
694 %
(184) %
1,165 %
n/m *
55 %
327 %
Investment gains (losses), net moved favorably by $75.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to fair value adjustments in relation to our seeded investment products
and derivative instruments.
Investment gains (losses), net moved unfavorably by $58.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared
to 2017. The variance was primarily due to fair value adjustments in relation to our consolidated variable interest entities
(“VIEs”) and other seeded investment products. The $10.2 million gain recognized on the sale of the Volantis UK Small
Cap (“Volantis”) alternative team assets in 2017 also contributed to the year-over-year unfavorable change.
Non-operating income and expenses (in millions):
Other non-operating income (expenses), net
Other non-operating income (expenses), net declined $45.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, compared
to the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily due to a $26.8 million fair value adjustment related to
the Dai-ichi options and a $22.3 million gain on the sale of our back-office and middle-office functions in the U.S., both
of which benefited other non-operating income (expenses), net during 2018. Also contributing to the decline was
unfavorable foreign currency translation of $20.4 million. These decreases were partially offset by a $20.0 million
contingent consideration adjustment associated with Geneva due to an updated forecast recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2019.
Other non-operating income (expenses), net improved $69.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2018,
compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. Fair value adjustments related to the Dai-ichi options, which expired in
October 2018, benefited other non-operating income (expenses), net by $26.2 million during the year ended December
31, 2018, compared to the same period in 2017. Other factors contributing to the increase included a $22.3 million gain
recognized in 2018 on the sale of our back-office and middle-office functions in the U.S., $15.5 million in interest
income and $5.9 million in favorable foreign currency translation.
Income Tax Provision
Our effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were as follows:
Effective tax rate
Year ended December 31,
2018
24.5 %
2019
23.6 %
2017
(47.1) %
The primary driver of the 2017 rate benefit was related to the re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities from
the Tax Act’s rate change in 2017 and was partially offset by the inclusion of the U.S.-based JCG entities for the seven
months after the Merger at higher U.S. tax rates than the UK statutory rate. The UK corporation tax rate decreased from
20% to 19% with effect from April 1, 2017.
40
41
Table of Contents Table of Contents
We largely operate in the US and the UK jurisdiction. The primary influence in 2018 and 2019 driving the overall
effective tax rate above the UK tax rate of 19% is the higher weightage of pre-tax income in the U.S. jurisdiction taxed
at 23.9% statutory rate (federal and state).
We anticipate our annual statutory tax rate will be in the 23% to 25% range in 2020. The primary influence driving the
annual statutory tax rate above the average statutory tax rate for 2020 is the mix shift in regional profitability with
different tax jurisdictions. Any tax legislative changes and new or proposed Treasury regulations may result in additional
income tax impacts, which could be material in the period any such changes are enacted.
2020 operating expenses
Non-compensation operating expenses are expected to increase in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase in non-
compensation operating expenses is expected to be in the low to mid-single digits. The adjusted compensation to
revenue ratio in 2020 is expected to be at the high end of the 40s, similar to 2019.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We report our financial results in accordance with GAAP. However, JHG management evaluates our profitability and
our ongoing operations using additional non-GAAP financial measures. Management uses these performance measures
to evaluate the business, and adjusted values are consistent with internal management reporting.
42
Table of Contents
We largely operate in the US and the UK jurisdiction. The primary influence in 2018 and 2019 driving the overall
effective tax rate above the UK tax rate of 19% is the higher weightage of pre-tax income in the U.S. jurisdiction taxed
at 23.9% statutory rate (federal and state).
We anticipate our annual statutory tax rate will be in the 23% to 25% range in 2020. The primary influence driving the
annual statutory tax rate above the average statutory tax rate for 2020 is the mix shift in regional profitability with
different tax jurisdictions. Any tax legislative changes and new or proposed Treasury regulations may result in additional
income tax impacts, which could be material in the period any such changes are enacted.
Non-compensation operating expenses are expected to increase in 2020 compared to 2019. The increase in non-
compensation operating expenses is expected to be in the low to mid-single digits. The adjusted compensation to
revenue ratio in 2020 is expected to be at the high end of the 40s, similar to 2019.
2020 operating expenses
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We report our financial results in accordance with GAAP. However, JHG management evaluates our profitability and
our ongoing operations using additional non-GAAP financial measures. Management uses these performance measures
to evaluate the business, and adjusted values are consistent with internal management reporting.
Alternative performance measures
The following is a reconciliation of revenue, operating expenses, operating income, net income attributable to JHG and
diluted earnings per share to adjusted revenue, adjusted operating expenses, adjusted operating income, adjusted net
income attributable to JHG and adjusted diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in
millions, except per share and operating margin data):
Reconciliation of revenue to adjusted revenue
Revenue
Management fees
Shareowner servicing fees
Other revenue
Adjusted revenue(1)
Reconciliation of operating expenses to adjusted operating expenses
Operating expenses
Employee compensation and benefits(2)
Long-term incentive plans(2)
Distribution expenses(1)
Investment administration(2)
General, administrative and occupancy(2)
Depreciation and amortization(3)
Adjusted operating expenses
Adjusted operating income
Operating margin(4)
Adjusted operating margin(5)
Reconciliation of net income attributable to JHG to adjusted net income
attributable to JHG
Net income attributable to JHG
Employee compensation and benefits(2)
Long-term incentive plans(2)
Investment administration(2)
General, administrative and occupancy(2)
Depreciation and amortization(3)
Interest expense(6)
Other non-operating income (expenses), net(6)
Income tax provision(7)
Adjusted net income attributable to JHG
Less: allocation of earnings to participating stock-based awards
Adjusted net income attributable to JHG common shareholders
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted (two class)
Diluted earnings per share (two class)(8)
Adjusted diluted earnings per share (two class)(9)
Year ended
December 31,
2019
Year ended
December 31,
2018
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,192.4 $
(189.6)
(149.4)
(105.3)
1,748.1 $
1,651.5 $
(19.1)
0.8
(444.3)
—
(20.0)
(47.4)
1,121.5 $
626.6
24.7%
35.8%
427.6 $
19.1
(0.8)
—
20.0
47.4
2.5
(24.3)
(13.2)
478.3
(13.1)
465.2 $
188.6
2.21 $
2.47 $
2,306.4
(221.5)
(117.1)
(108.1)
1,859.7
1,656.6
(21.4)
(10.6)
(446.7)
(0.7)
(6.8)
(36.7)
1,133.7
726.0
28.2%
39.0%
523.8
21.4
10.6
0.7
6.8
36.7
3.1
(46.0)
(7.5)
549.6
(13.4)
536.2
195.9
2.61
2.74
(1) We contract with third-party intermediaries to distribute and service certain of our investment products. Fees for
distribution and servicing related activities are either provided for separately in an investment product’s prospectus
or are part of the management fee. Under both arrangements, the fees are collected by us and passed-through to
third-party intermediaries who are responsible for performing the applicable services. The majority of distribution
and servicing fees we collect are passed through to third-party intermediaries. JHG management believes that the
deduction of distribution and service fees from revenue in the computation of adjusted revenue reflects the pass-
through nature of these revenues. In certain arrangements, we perform the distribution and servicing activities and
42
43
Table of Contents Table of Contents
retain the applicable fees. Revenues for distribution and servicing activities performed by us are not deducted from
GAAP revenue.
(2) Adjustments primarily represent integration costs in relation to the Merger, including severance costs, legal costs
and consulting fees. JHG management believes these costs do not represent our ongoing operations.
(3) Investment management contracts have been identified as a separately identifiable intangible asset arising on the
acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses. Such contracts are recognized at the net present value of the expected
future cash flows arising from the contracts at the date of acquisition. For segregated mandate contracts, the
intangible asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the contracts. JHG management
believes these non-cash and acquisition-related costs do not represent our ongoing operations.
(4) Operating margin is operating income divided by revenue.
(5) Adjusted operating margin is adjusted operating income divided by adjusted revenue.
(6) Adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily represent contingent consideration adjustments
associated with acquisitions prior to the Merger and increased debt expense as a consequence of the fair value uplift
on debt due to acquisition accounting. Adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily represent fair
value movements on options issued to Dai-ichi, contingent consideration costs associated with acquisitions prior to
the Merger and increased debt expense as a consequence of the fair value uplift on debt due to acquisition
accounting. JHG management believes these expenses do not represent our ongoing operations.
(7) The tax impact of the adjustments is calculated based on the U.S. or foreign statutory tax rate as they relate to each
adjustment. Certain adjustments are either not taxable or not tax-deductible.
(8) Diluted earnings per share is net income attributable to JHG common shareholders divided by weighted-average
diluted common shares outstanding.
(9) Adjusted diluted earnings per share is adjusted net income attributable to JHG common shareholders divided by
weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our capital structure, together with available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, and further capital
and credit market activities, if necessary, should provide us with sufficient resources to meet present and future cash
needs, including operating and other obligations as they fall due and anticipated future capital requirements.
The following table summarizes key balance sheet data relating to our liquidity and capital resources as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents held by the Group
Investment securities held by the Group
Fees and other receivables
Debt
December 31, December 31,
2019
732.4 $
223.6 $
334.8 $
316.2 $
2018
879.0
277.9
309.2
319.1
$
$
$
$
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash at banks held in money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents and
investment securities held by consolidated VIEs and consolidated voting rights entities (“VREs”) are not available for
general corporate purposes and have been excluded from the table above.
Investment securities held by us represent seeded investment products (exclusive of investments held by consolidated
VIEs and VREs), investments related to deferred compensation plans and other less significant investments.
44
Table of Contents
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash balance at beginning of year
Cash balance at end of year
Operating Activities
We believe that existing cash and cash from operations should be sufficient to satisfy our short-term capital
requirements. Expected short-term uses of cash include ordinary operating expenditures, seed capital investments,
interest expense, dividend payments, income tax payments, contingent consideration payments, integration costs in
relation to the Merger and common stock repurchases. We may also use available cash for other general corporate
purposes and acquisitions.
Cash Flows
A summary of cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was as follows (in millions):
Cash flows provided by (used for):
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
retain the applicable fees. Revenues for distribution and servicing activities performed by us are not deducted from
GAAP revenue.
(2) Adjustments primarily represent integration costs in relation to the Merger, including severance costs, legal costs
and consulting fees. JHG management believes these costs do not represent our ongoing operations.
(3) Investment management contracts have been identified as a separately identifiable intangible asset arising on the
acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses. Such contracts are recognized at the net present value of the expected
future cash flows arising from the contracts at the date of acquisition. For segregated mandate contracts, the
intangible asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the contracts. JHG management
believes these non-cash and acquisition-related costs do not represent our ongoing operations.
(4) Operating margin is operating income divided by revenue.
(5) Adjusted operating margin is adjusted operating income divided by adjusted revenue.
(6) Adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily represent contingent consideration adjustments
associated with acquisitions prior to the Merger and increased debt expense as a consequence of the fair value uplift
on debt due to acquisition accounting. Adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily represent fair
value movements on options issued to Dai-ichi, contingent consideration costs associated with acquisitions prior to
the Merger and increased debt expense as a consequence of the fair value uplift on debt due to acquisition
accounting. JHG management believes these expenses do not represent our ongoing operations.
(9) Adjusted diluted earnings per share is adjusted net income attributable to JHG common shareholders divided by
weighted-average diluted common shares outstanding.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our capital structure, together with available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, and further capital
and credit market activities, if necessary, should provide us with sufficient resources to meet present and future cash
needs, including operating and other obligations as they fall due and anticipated future capital requirements.
The following table summarizes key balance sheet data relating to our liquidity and capital resources as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents held by the Group
Investment securities held by the Group
Fees and other receivables
Debt
December 31, December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
$
$
732.4 $
223.6 $
334.8 $
316.2 $
879.0
277.9
309.2
319.1
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash at banks held in money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents and
investment securities held by consolidated VIEs and consolidated voting rights entities (“VREs”) are not available for
general corporate purposes and have been excluded from the table above.
Investment securities held by us represent seeded investment products (exclusive of investments held by consolidated
VIEs and VREs), investments related to deferred compensation plans and other less significant investments.
(7) The tax impact of the adjustments is calculated based on the U.S. or foreign statutory tax rate as they relate to each
adjustment. Certain adjustments are either not taxable or not tax-deductible.
Fluctuations in operating cash flows are attributable to changes in net income and working capital items, which can vary
from period to period based on the amount and timing of cash receipts and payments.
(8) Diluted earnings per share is net income attributable to JHG common shareholders divided by weighted-average
Investing Activities
diluted common shares outstanding.
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was as follows
(in millions):
2019
Year ended December 31,
2018
35.1 $
2017
$
Sales (purchases) of investment securities, net
Sales (purchases) of securities by consolidated investment
products, net
Purchase of property, equipment and software
Proceeds from BNP Paribas transaction, net
Cash received (paid) on settled hedges, net
Cash acquired from acquisition of JCG
Other
141.4
(17.7)
—
(23.7)
417.2
(5.2)
Cash provided by (used for) provided by investing activities $ (389.3) $ 100.9 $ 519.5
(320.8)
(37.8)
—
(34.9)
—
2.7
36.5
(29.1)
36.5
16.0
—
5.9
1.5 $
7.5
Cash outflows from investing activities were $389.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to
net purchases of securities by consolidated investment products, purchases of property, equipment and software, and net
cash paid on settled hedges. The change in cash from investing activities comparing the year ended December 31, 2019,
to the year ended December 31, 2018, is primarily due to sales and purchases of securities within consolidated
investment products. The increase is due to increased third-party activity within the consolidated investment products
primarily due to a larger VIE investment securities balance, which increased from $282.7 million at December 31, 2018,
to $924.8 million at December 31, 2019.
Cash inflows from investing activities in 2018 were primarily due to proceeds received from the sale of our back-office
and middle-office functions in the U.S., net sales of investment securities and cash received on settled hedges within our
economic seed hedge program. We periodically add new investment strategies to our investment product offerings by
44
45
$ 463.2 $ 670.8 $ 444.1
519.5
(504.7)
12.1
471.0
323.2
$ 796.5 $ 916.6 $ 794.2
100.9
(616.8)
(32.5)
122.4
794.2
(389.3)
(207.0)
13.0
(120.1)
916.6
Table of Contents Table of Contents
providing the initial cash investment or seeding. The primary purpose of seeded investment products is to generate an
investment performance track record in a product to attract third-party investors. We may redeem invested seed capital
for a variety of reasons, including when third-party investments in the relevant product are sufficient to sustain the
investment strategy. These cash inflows are partially offset by cash outflows related to property, equipment and software
purchases.
Cash inflows from investing activities in 2017 were primarily driven by acquiring cash of $417.2 million in respect of
the Merger, along with receiving proceeds of $148.9 million from the disposal of investments within consolidated
seeded investment products and redemptions of seed capital investment securities.
Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was as follows (in millions):
Dividends paid to shareholders
Repayment of long-term debt
Third-party sales (redemptions) in consolidated seeded investment products,
net
Purchase of common stock for stock-based compensation plans
Purchase of common stock as part of share buyback program
Payment of contingent consideration
Proceeds from issuance of options
Proceeds from settlement of convertible note hedge
Settlement of stock warrant
Proceeds from stock-based compensation plans
Other
Cash used for financing activities
$
Year ended December 31,
2018
(275.1) $
(95.3)
2019
(272.4) $
—
2017
(256.0)
(92.5)
$
320.8
(39.0)
(199.9)
(14.1)
—
—
—
—
(2.4)
(207.0) $
(36.5)
(86.6)
(99.8)
(22.7)
—
—
—
—
(0.8)
(616.8) $
(141.4)
(52.1)
—
—
25.7
59.3
(47.8)
6.0
(5.9)
(504.7)
Cash outflows from financing activities were $207.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to
dividends paid to shareholders and the purchase of common stock for the share buyback program, partially offset by
third-party sales in consolidated seeded investment products. The change in cash from financing activities comparing the
year ended December 31, 2019 to 2018, is primarily due to sales and purchases of securities within consolidated
investment products. The increase is due to increased third-party activity within the consolidated investment products
primarily due to a larger VIE investment securities balance, which increased from $282.7 million at December 31, 2018,
to $924.8 million at December 31, 2019.
Cash outflows from financing activities in 2018 were primarily due to $275.1 million of dividends paid to shareholders,
common stock purchase for stock-based compensation plans and the share buyback program totaling $186.4 million, and
payment of the remaining principal balance related to the 2018 Convertible Notes.
Cash outflows from financing activities in 2017 included dividend payments of $256.0 million, third-party redemptions
in consolidated seeded investment products of $141.4 million and principal payments related to the 2018 Convertible
Notes of $92.5 million.
Other Sources of Liquidity
At December 31, 2019, we had a $200 million unsecured, revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility
includes an option for us to request an increase to the overall amount of the Credit Facility of up to an additional
$50.0 million. The maturity date of the Credit Facility is February 16, 2024.
The Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility bears interest on borrowings
outstanding at the relevant interbank offer rate plus a spread.
46
Table of Contents
providing the initial cash investment or seeding. The primary purpose of seeded investment products is to generate an
investment performance track record in a product to attract third-party investors. We may redeem invested seed capital
for a variety of reasons, including when third-party investments in the relevant product are sufficient to sustain the
investment strategy. These cash inflows are partially offset by cash outflows related to property, equipment and software
purchases.
Cash inflows from investing activities in 2017 were primarily driven by acquiring cash of $417.2 million in respect of
the Merger, along with receiving proceeds of $148.9 million from the disposal of investments within consolidated
seeded investment products and redemptions of seed capital investment securities.
Financing Activities
Cash used for financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, was as follows (in millions):
Dividends paid to shareholders
Repayment of long-term debt
net
Third-party sales (redemptions) in consolidated seeded investment products,
Purchase of common stock for stock-based compensation plans
Purchase of common stock as part of share buyback program
Payment of contingent consideration
Proceeds from issuance of options
Proceeds from settlement of convertible note hedge
Settlement of stock warrant
Proceeds from stock-based compensation plans
Other
Cash used for financing activities
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
(272.4) $
(275.1) $
(256.0)
—
(95.3)
(92.5)
320.8
(39.0)
(199.9)
(14.1)
—
—
—
—
(2.4)
(36.5)
(86.6)
(99.8)
(22.7)
—
—
—
—
(0.8)
(141.4)
(52.1)
—
—
25.7
59.3
(47.8)
6.0
(5.9)
$
(207.0) $
(616.8) $
(504.7)
Cash outflows from financing activities were $207.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to
dividends paid to shareholders and the purchase of common stock for the share buyback program, partially offset by
third-party sales in consolidated seeded investment products. The change in cash from financing activities comparing the
year ended December 31, 2019 to 2018, is primarily due to sales and purchases of securities within consolidated
investment products. The increase is due to increased third-party activity within the consolidated investment products
primarily due to a larger VIE investment securities balance, which increased from $282.7 million at December 31, 2018,
to $924.8 million at December 31, 2019.
Cash outflows from financing activities in 2018 were primarily due to $275.1 million of dividends paid to shareholders,
common stock purchase for stock-based compensation plans and the share buyback program totaling $186.4 million, and
payment of the remaining principal balance related to the 2018 Convertible Notes.
Cash outflows from financing activities in 2017 included dividend payments of $256.0 million, third-party redemptions
in consolidated seeded investment products of $141.4 million and principal payments related to the 2018 Convertible
Notes of $92.5 million.
Other Sources of Liquidity
At December 31, 2019, we had a $200 million unsecured, revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility
includes an option for us to request an increase to the overall amount of the Credit Facility of up to an additional
$50.0 million. The maturity date of the Credit Facility is February 16, 2024.
The Credit Facility may be used for general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility bears interest on borrowings
outstanding at the relevant interbank offer rate plus a spread.
The Credit Facility contains a financial covenant with respect to leverage. The financing leverage ratio cannot exceed
3.00x EBITDA. At the latest practicable date before the date of this report, we were in compliance with all covenants
and there were no borrowings under the Credit Facility.
Regulatory Capital
We are subject to regulatory oversight by the SEC, FINRA, CFTC, FCA and other international regulatory bodies. We
ensure that we are compliant with our regulatory obligations at all times. Our primary capital requirement relates to the
FCA-supervised regulatory group (a sub-group of our company), comprising Henderson Group Holdings Asset
Management Limited, all of its subsidiaries and Janus Capital International Limited (“JCIL”). JCIL is included to meet
the requirements of certain regulations under the Banking Consolidation Directive. The combined capital requirement is
£279.4 million ($370.1 million), resulting in capital above the regulatory group’s regulatory requirement of
£192.7 million ($255.3 million) as of December 31, 2019, based upon internal calculations and taking into account the
effect of dividends related to 2019 results that will be paid in 2020. Capital requirements in other jurisdictions are not
significant.
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents contractual obligations and associated maturities at December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Debt
Interest payments
Finance leases
Operating leases
Total
More than
Less than
1 year
$
— $
1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years 5 years
— $ 300.0 $
23.2
—
60.3
$ 46.4 $ 123.0 $ 383.5 $
Total
— $ 300.0
81.7
—
0.9
—
10.9
181.2
10.9 $ 563.8
14.6
0.7
31.1
43.9
0.2
78.9
Debt maturing in three to five years represents the principal value of the 2025 Senior Notes.
Short-Term Liquidity Requirements
Common Stock Purchases
At our 2018 Annual General Meeting, shareholders authorized us to make on-market purchases of up to 10% of our
issued share capital, and this authorization was renewed at our 2019 Annual General Meeting. In March 2019, we
commenced an on-market buyback program to repurchase up to $200 million of our common stock on the NYSE and
CDIs on the ASX. We repurchased a total of 9,437,071 shares of our common stock and CDIs for $199.9 million during
the year ended December 31, 2019.
On February 3, 2020, the Board approved a new on-market share buyback program to be commenced and announced on
a date to be determined by us. We intend to spend up to $200 million to repurchase our common stock on the NYSE and
CDIs on the ASX as part of this buyback program, which is expected to be completed no later than the date of our 2021
Annual General Meeting. Purchases pursuant to the new buyback program after the date of our Annual General Meeting
to be held on April 30, 2020, will be subject to our obtaining renewed shareholder authorization for on-market purchases
at the 2020 Annual General Meeting. Further information regarding the proposed on-market buyback program will be
announced immediately prior to its finalization and formal launch.
In addition, during the first quarter of 2020, we intend to purchase shares on-market for the annual share grants
associated with the 2019 variable compensation payable to our employees. These purchases are unrelated to the new
Board-approved share buyback program discussed above. As a policy, we do not issue new shares to employees as part
of our annual compensation practices.
46
47
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Some of our executives and employees receive rights over our common stock as part of their remuneration arrangements
and employee entitlements. These entitlements are usually satisfied by the transfer of existing common stock acquired
on-market. We purchased 1,630,669 shares at an average price of $23.33 in satisfaction of employee awards and
entitlements during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Dividends
The payment of cash dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends on many factors, including
our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and legal requirements.
Dividends declared and paid during the year ended December 31, 2019, were as follows:
Dividend
per share
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
Date
declared
February 4, 2019
May 1, 2019
July 30, 2019
October 29, 2019
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Dividends paid
(in US$ millions)
69.7
68.6
67.8
66.3
Date
paid
February 26, 2019
May 29, 2019
August 28, 2019
November 25, 2019
On February 3, 2020, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.36 per share. The quarterly dividend will be
paid on March 5, 2020, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 2020.
Long-Term Liquidity Requirements
Expected long-term commitments as of December 31, 2019, include principal and interest payments related to the 2025
Senior Notes, operating and finance lease payments, Intech senior profits interests awards, Intech appreciation rights and
phantom interests, Intech noncontrolling interests, and contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Geneva. We
expect to fund our long-term commitments with existing cash, with cash generated from operations or by accessing
capital and credit markets as necessary.
2025 Senior Notes
The 2025 Senior Notes have a principal amount of $300.0 million, pay interest at 4.875% semiannually on February 1
and August 1 of each year, and mature on August 1, 2025.
Intech
Intech has granted long-term incentive awards to retain and incentivize employees. The awards consist of appreciation
rights, profits interests and phantom interests, and are designed to give recipients an equity-like stake in Intech. The
grant date fair value of the appreciation rights is amortized using a graded basis over the 10-year vesting period. The
awards are exercisable upon termination of employment from Intech to the extent vested. The profits interests and
phantom interests awards entitle recipients to 9.0% of Intech’s pre-incentive profits.
48
Table of Contents
Dividends
The payment of cash dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends on many factors, including
our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and legal requirements.
Dividends declared and paid during the year ended December 31, 2019, were as follows:
Dividend
per share
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
Date
declared
February 4, 2019
May 1, 2019
July 30, 2019
October 29, 2019
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Dividends paid
(in US$ millions)
Date
paid
February 26, 2019
May 29, 2019
August 28, 2019
November 25, 2019
69.7
68.6
67.8
66.3
On February 3, 2020, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.36 per share. The quarterly dividend will be
paid on March 5, 2020, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 2020.
Expected long-term commitments as of December 31, 2019, include principal and interest payments related to the 2025
Senior Notes, operating and finance lease payments, Intech senior profits interests awards, Intech appreciation rights and
phantom interests, Intech noncontrolling interests, and contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Geneva. We
expect to fund our long-term commitments with existing cash, with cash generated from operations or by accessing
capital and credit markets as necessary.
2025 Senior Notes
Intech
The 2025 Senior Notes have a principal amount of $300.0 million, pay interest at 4.875% semiannually on February 1
and August 1 of each year, and mature on August 1, 2025.
Intech has granted long-term incentive awards to retain and incentivize employees. The awards consist of appreciation
rights, profits interests and phantom interests, and are designed to give recipients an equity-like stake in Intech. The
grant date fair value of the appreciation rights is amortized using a graded basis over the 10-year vesting period. The
awards are exercisable upon termination of employment from Intech to the extent vested. The profits interests and
phantom interests awards entitle recipients to 9.0% of Intech’s pre-incentive profits.
Some of our executives and employees receive rights over our common stock as part of their remuneration arrangements
and employee entitlements. These entitlements are usually satisfied by the transfer of existing common stock acquired
on-market. We purchased 1,630,669 shares at an average price of $23.33 in satisfaction of employee awards and
entitlements during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Contingent Consideration
The maximum amount payable and fair value of Geneva and Kapstream Capital Pty Limited (“Kapstream”) contingent
consideration are summarized below (in millions):
Maximum amount payable
Fair value included in:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Total fair value
As of December 31, 2019
Geneva
Kapstream
$
52.2 $
14.4
$
$
— $
6.9
6.9 $
14.3
—
14.3
In February 2020, we paid $13.8 million in relation to Kapstream contingent consideration, which represented the final
payment under the agreement. Refer to Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 10 — Fair
Value Measurements for a detailed discussion of contingent consideration.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The latest triennial valuation of our defined benefit pension plan resulted in a surplus of £12.0 million ($15.9 million).
Long-Term Liquidity Requirements
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that may provide, or require us to provide, financing, liquidity,
market or credit risk support that is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates used to prepare the consolidated financial statements. In
general, management’s estimates are based on historical experience, information from third-party professionals, as
appropriate, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under current facts and circumstances.
Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management. The critical accounting policies and estimates
relate to the areas of investment securities, contingent consideration, goodwill and intangible assets, retirement benefit
plans and income taxes.
Valuation of Investment Securities
Fair value of our investment securities is generally determined using observable market data based on recent trading
activity. Where observable market data is unavailable due to a lack of trading activity, we use internally developed
models to estimate fair value and independent third parties to validate assumptions, when appropriate. Estimating fair
value requires significant management judgment, including benchmarking to similar instruments with observable market
data and applying appropriate discounts that reflect differences between the securities that we are valuing and the
selected benchmark. Any variation in the assumptions used to approximate fair value could have a material adverse
effect on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and results of operations.
48
49
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration, resulting from business combinations, is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date as part
of the business combination and discounted where the time value of money is material. The determination of the fair
value is based on discounted cash flows, with the key assumptions being the probability of meeting each performance
target and the discount factor applied. When the contingent consideration meets the definition of a financial liability, it is
subsequently re-measured to fair value at each reporting date through net income. Finance charges, where discounting
has been applied, are also recognized through net income.
Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The recognition and measurement of goodwill and intangible assets requires significant management estimates and
judgment, including the valuation and expected life determination in connection with the initial purchase price allocation
and the ongoing evaluation for impairment. The judgment exercised by management in arriving at these valuations
includes the selection of market growth rates, fund flow assumptions, expected margins and costs.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of acquired companies and is not
amortized.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily represent trademarks and investment management agreements. Investment
management agreements without a contractual termination date are classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets based
upon the following: (i) there is no legal or statutory limitation on the contract period to manage these investment
products; (ii) we expect to, and have the ability to, operate these investment products indefinitely; (iii) the investment
products have multiple investors and are not reliant on an individual investor or small group of investors for their
continued operation; (iv) the current competitive environment does not indicate a finite life; and (v) there is a high
likelihood of continued renewal based on historical experience. The assumption that investment management agreements
are indefinite-lived assets is reviewed at least annually or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate that the
useful life is no longer indefinite.
Definite-lived intangible assets represent certain other investment management contracts, which are amortized over their
estimated lives using the straight-line method. The initial estimated lives of the definite-lived contracts vary and range
from eight years to 22 years.
Impairment Testing
We perform our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on October 1. We may
first assess goodwill for impairment using qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a
quantitative impairment test. We chose to forego the qualitative test and instead perform a quantitative impairment test,
determining the enterprise value of the reporting unit and comparing it to our equity balance (carrying amount). The
results of the assessment revealed the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was $0.3 billion greater than the carrying
value. While the results of the assessment were favorable, we are at risk of failing step one of the assessment in 2020 if
the price of our stock declines and the deterioration of the stock price becomes sustained.
Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets were tested for impairment in the second quarter 2019 because of performance
and growth concerns. A discounted cash flow model was used to determine the estimated fair value. Some of the inputs
used in the discounted cash flow model required significant management judgment, including the discount rate, terminal
growth rate and forecasted financial results. The results of the valuation indicated an estimated value of $132.0 million,
which was $18.0 million below the $150.0 million carrying value of the intangible asset. As such, an $18.0 million
impairment was recorded in depreciation and amortization expense in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. The carrying value of the intangible asset as of December 31, 2019 (post-impairment), was $132.0 million.
We also assessed our indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of the annual impairment assessment. A qualitative
approach was used to determine the likelihood of impairment, with AUM being the focus of the assessment. After
reviewing the results of the qualitative assessment, certain intangible assets comprised of investment management
50
Table of Contents
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration, resulting from business combinations, is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date as part
of the business combination and discounted where the time value of money is material. The determination of the fair
value is based on discounted cash flows, with the key assumptions being the probability of meeting each performance
target and the discount factor applied. When the contingent consideration meets the definition of a financial liability, it is
subsequently re-measured to fair value at each reporting date through net income. Finance charges, where discounting
has been applied, are also recognized through net income.
Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The recognition and measurement of goodwill and intangible assets requires significant management estimates and
judgment, including the valuation and expected life determination in connection with the initial purchase price allocation
and the ongoing evaluation for impairment. The judgment exercised by management in arriving at these valuations
includes the selection of market growth rates, fund flow assumptions, expected margins and costs.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of acquired companies and is not
amortized.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets primarily represent trademarks and investment management agreements. Investment
management agreements without a contractual termination date are classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets based
upon the following: (i) there is no legal or statutory limitation on the contract period to manage these investment
products; (ii) we expect to, and have the ability to, operate these investment products indefinitely; (iii) the investment
products have multiple investors and are not reliant on an individual investor or small group of investors for their
continued operation; (iv) the current competitive environment does not indicate a finite life; and (v) there is a high
likelihood of continued renewal based on historical experience. The assumption that investment management agreements
are indefinite-lived assets is reviewed at least annually or more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate that the
useful life is no longer indefinite.
Definite-lived intangible assets represent certain other investment management contracts, which are amortized over their
estimated lives using the straight-line method. The initial estimated lives of the definite-lived contracts vary and range
from eight years to 22 years.
Impairment Testing
We perform our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on October 1. We may
first assess goodwill for impairment using qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a
quantitative impairment test. We chose to forego the qualitative test and instead perform a quantitative impairment test,
determining the enterprise value of the reporting unit and comparing it to our equity balance (carrying amount). The
results of the assessment revealed the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was $0.3 billion greater than the carrying
value. While the results of the assessment were favorable, we are at risk of failing step one of the assessment in 2020 if
the price of our stock declines and the deterioration of the stock price becomes sustained.
Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets were tested for impairment in the second quarter 2019 because of performance
and growth concerns. A discounted cash flow model was used to determine the estimated fair value. Some of the inputs
used in the discounted cash flow model required significant management judgment, including the discount rate, terminal
growth rate and forecasted financial results. The results of the valuation indicated an estimated value of $132.0 million,
which was $18.0 million below the $150.0 million carrying value of the intangible asset. As such, an $18.0 million
impairment was recorded in depreciation and amortization expense in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. The carrying value of the intangible asset as of December 31, 2019 (post-impairment), was $132.0 million.
We also assessed our indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of the annual impairment assessment. A qualitative
approach was used to determine the likelihood of impairment, with AUM being the focus of the assessment. After
reviewing the results of the qualitative assessment, certain intangible assets comprised of investment management
agreements with a carrying value of $167.6 million as of September 30, 2019 required further review to determine if
they were impaired. We prepared a discounted cash flow model to arrive at the estimated fair value of the intangible
asset, which was above the carrying value of the asset. Some of the inputs used in the discounted cash flow model
required significant management judgment; this includes the discount rate, terminal growth rate and forecasted financial
results. For the remaining indefinite-lived intangible assets, we concluded it is more likely than not that the fair values of
our intangible assets exceed their carrying values; no impairment was recorded. However, certain intangible assets, with
a total carrying value of $394.7 million as of December 31, 2019, are at risk of impairment in 2020 primarily due to
lower than expected growth.
Our definite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. There were no definite-lived intangible asset impairments identified during
the year ended December 31, 2019.
Retirement Benefit Plans
We provide certain employees with retirement benefits through defined benefit plans.
The defined benefit obligation is determined annually by independent qualified actuaries using the projected unit credit
method and is measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows using a discount rate based on
AA-rated corporate bond yields of appropriate duration. The plan assets are recognized at fair value. The funded status
of the defined benefit pension plan, (the “plan”), being the resulting surplus or deficit of defined benefit assets less
liabilities, is recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of any taxes that would be deducted at source.
Actuarial gains and losses arise as a result of differences between actual experience and actuarial assumptions. We have
adopted the “10% corridor” method for recognizing actuarial gains and losses. This means that cumulative actuarial
gains or losses up to an amount equal to 10% of the higher of the liabilities and the assets of the scheme (the “corridor”)
have no immediate impact on net income and are instead recognized through other comprehensive income. Cumulative
gains or losses greater than this corridor are amortized to net income over the average remaining future working lifetime
of the active members in the plan.
Net periodic benefit cost is recorded as a component of net income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income and includes service cost, interest cost and the expected return on plan assets.
The costs of and period-end obligations under, defined benefit pension plans are determined using actuarial valuations.
The actuarial valuation involves making a number of assumptions, including those related to the discount rate, the
expected rate of return on assets, future salary increases, mortality rates and future pension increases. Due to the
long-term nature of these plans, such estimates are subject to significant uncertainty.
The table below shows the movement in funded status that would result from certain sensitivity changes (in millions):
Discount rate: -0.1%
Inflation: +0.1%
Life expectancy: +1 year at age 65
Market value of return seeking portfolio falls 25%
Income Taxes
Decrease in
funded status at
December 31, 2019
13.2
$
1.5
$
21.2
$
51.7
$
We operate in several countries, states and other taxing jurisdictions through various subsidiaries and branches, and must
allocate income, expenses and earnings under the various laws and regulations of each of these taxing jurisdictions.
Accordingly, the provision for income taxes represents the total estimate of the liability that we have incurred for doing
business each year in all of the locations. Annually we file tax returns that represent filing positions within each
50
51
Table of Contents Table of Contents
jurisdiction and settle return liabilities. Each jurisdiction has the right to audit those returns and may take different
positions with respect to income and expense allocations and taxable earnings determinations. Because the
determinations of the annual provisions are subject to judgments and estimates, it is possible that actual results will vary
from those recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, it is likely that additions to, or reductions
of, income tax expense will occur each year for prior reporting periods as actual tax returns and tax audits are settled.
In the assessment of uncertain tax positions, significant management judgment is required to estimate the range of
possible outcomes and determine the probability, on a more likely than not basis, of favorable or unfavorable tax
outcomes and the potential interest and penalties related to such unfavorable outcomes. Actual future tax consequences
on settlement of our uncertain tax positions may be materially different than management’s current estimates.
Deferred tax assets, net of any associated valuation allowance, have been recognized based on management’s belief that
taxable income of the appropriate character, more likely than not, will be sufficient to realize the benefits of these assets
over time. In the event that actual results differ from expectations, or if historical trends of positive operating income
change, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on some or all of these deferred tax assets, which may have
a significant effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In assessing whether a valuation allowance
should be established against a deferred income tax asset, we consider the nature, frequency and severity of recent
losses, forecasts of future profitability and the duration of statutory carryback and carryforward periods, among other
factors.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following information describes the key aspects of certain items for which we are exposed to market risk.
Management Fees
Management fee revenues are generally based upon a percentage of the market value of AUM and are calculated as a
percentage of either the daily, month-end or quarter-end average asset balance in accordance with contractual
agreements. Accordingly, fluctuations in the financial markets have a direct effect on our operating results. Although
fluctuations in the financial markets have a direct effect on our operating results, AUM may outperform or underperform
the financial markets. As such, quantifying the impact of correlation between AUM and our operating results may be
misleading.
Performance Fees
Performance fee revenue is derived from a number of funds and clients. As a result, our revenues are subject to volatility
beyond market-based fluctuations discussed in the “Management Fees” section above. Performance fees are specified in
certain fund and client contracts and are based on investment performance either on an absolute basis or compared to an
established index over a specified period of time. In many cases, performance fees are subject to a hurdle rate.
Performance fees are recognized at the end of the contractual period (typically monthly, quarterly or annually). Our
performance fees depend on internal performance and market trends, and are, therefore, subject to volatility year over
year. We recognized performance fees of $17.6 million, $7.1 million and $103.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, $81.5 billion and $68.6 billion of
AUM generated performance fees during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
52
Table of Contents
jurisdiction and settle return liabilities. Each jurisdiction has the right to audit those returns and may take different
positions with respect to income and expense allocations and taxable earnings determinations. Because the
determinations of the annual provisions are subject to judgments and estimates, it is possible that actual results will vary
from those recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, it is likely that additions to, or reductions
of, income tax expense will occur each year for prior reporting periods as actual tax returns and tax audits are settled.
In the assessment of uncertain tax positions, significant management judgment is required to estimate the range of
possible outcomes and determine the probability, on a more likely than not basis, of favorable or unfavorable tax
outcomes and the potential interest and penalties related to such unfavorable outcomes. Actual future tax consequences
on settlement of our uncertain tax positions may be materially different than management’s current estimates.
Deferred tax assets, net of any associated valuation allowance, have been recognized based on management’s belief that
taxable income of the appropriate character, more likely than not, will be sufficient to realize the benefits of these assets
over time. In the event that actual results differ from expectations, or if historical trends of positive operating income
change, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on some or all of these deferred tax assets, which may have
a significant effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In assessing whether a valuation allowance
should be established against a deferred income tax asset, we consider the nature, frequency and severity of recent
losses, forecasts of future profitability and the duration of statutory carryback and carryforward periods, among other
factors.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following information describes the key aspects of certain items for which we are exposed to market risk.
Management fee revenues are generally based upon a percentage of the market value of AUM and are calculated as a
percentage of either the daily, month-end or quarter-end average asset balance in accordance with contractual
agreements. Accordingly, fluctuations in the financial markets have a direct effect on our operating results. Although
fluctuations in the financial markets have a direct effect on our operating results, AUM may outperform or underperform
the financial markets. As such, quantifying the impact of correlation between AUM and our operating results may be
Management Fees
misleading.
Performance Fees
Performance fee revenue is derived from a number of funds and clients. As a result, our revenues are subject to volatility
beyond market-based fluctuations discussed in the “Management Fees” section above. Performance fees are specified in
certain fund and client contracts and are based on investment performance either on an absolute basis or compared to an
established index over a specified period of time. In many cases, performance fees are subject to a hurdle rate.
Performance fees are recognized at the end of the contractual period (typically monthly, quarterly or annually). Our
performance fees depend on internal performance and market trends, and are, therefore, subject to volatility year over
year. We recognized performance fees of $17.6 million, $7.1 million and $103.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, $81.5 billion and $68.6 billion of
AUM generated performance fees during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Investment Securities
At December 31, 2019, we were exposed to market price risk as a result of investment securities on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The following is a summary of the effect that a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in market prices
would have on our investment securities subject to market price fluctuations as of December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Investment securities:
Seeded investment products (including VIEs)
Investments related to deferred compensation plans
Other
Total investment securities
Fair value
assuming a 10% assuming a 10%
Fair value
Fair value
increase
decrease
$ 1,047.0 $
125.9
5.4
$ 1,178.3 $
1,151.7 $
138.5
5.9
1,296.1 $
942.3
113.3
4.9
1,060.5
Certain investment securities include debt securities that contribute to the achievement of defined investment objectives.
Debt securities are exposed to interest rate risk and credit risk. Movement in interest rates would be reflected in the value
of the securities; refer to the quantitative analysis above.
Derivative Instruments
We maintain an economic hedge program that uses derivative instruments to mitigate market volatility of certain seeded
investments. Market fluctuations are mitigated using derivative instruments, including futures, credit default swaps,
index swaps and total return swaps. We also operate a rolling program of foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate
the non-functional currency exposures arising from certain seed capital investments. We were party to the following
derivative instruments as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Futures
Credit default swaps
Total return swaps
Foreign currency forward contracts
Notional value
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
147.1
222.9 $
$
133.2
143.0 $
$
77.2
46.3 $
$
131.8
327.8 $
$
Changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized in investment gains (losses), net in the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income. Changes in fair value of foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges
for accounting purposes are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income under net investment hedge
accounting.
Foreign Currency Exchange Sensitivity
Foreign currency risk is the risk that we will sustain losses through adverse movements in foreign currency exchange
rates, where we transact in currencies that are different than our functional currency.
As our functional currency is USD, we are exposed to foreign currency risk through our exposure to non-USD income,
expenses, assets and liabilities of our overseas subsidiaries, as well as net assets and liabilities denominated in a currency
other than USD. We manage our currency exposure by monitoring foreign currency positions. We seek to naturally
offset exposures where possible and actively hedge certain exposures on a case-by-case basis.
52
53
Table of Contents Table of Contents
The following table illustrates the impact of the below currencies weakening by 10% on all unhedged financial assets
and liabilities denominated in currencies material to us other than USD (in millions):
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Other
comprehensive
income
Other
comprehensive
Net income
attributable to attributable to attributable to attributable to
Net income
income
Great British pound
Australian dollar
Euro
JHG
JHG
JHG
JHG
$
$
$
4.3 $
0.9 $
(1.9) $
271.5 $
28.6 $
9.4 $
(13.9) $
(4.2) $
(0.6) $
176.2
27.9
0.8
54
Table of Contents
The following table illustrates the impact of the below currencies weakening by 10% on all unhedged financial assets
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
and liabilities denominated in currencies material to us other than USD (in millions):
Index to Financial Statements
Great British pound
Australian dollar
Euro
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Other
Other
comprehensive
comprehensive
Net income
income
Net income
income
attributable to attributable to attributable to attributable to
JHG
JHG
JHG
JHG
$
$
$
4.3 $
0.9 $
(1.9) $
271.5 $
28.6 $
9.4 $
(13.9) $
(4.2) $
(0.6) $
176.2
27.9
0.8
Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or are insignificant, or the required
information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Page
566
600
611
622
633
644
655
54
55
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Janus Henderson Group plc
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Janus Henderson Group plc and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of changes in
equity and of cash flows for the year then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated
financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects.
Our audit of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
56
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Janus Henderson Group plc
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Janus Henderson Group plc and its subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2019, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, of changes in
equity and of cash flows for the year then ended, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated
financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects.
Our audit of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated
financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to
accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially
challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way
our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical
audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it
relates.
Impairment Assessment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets Related to Certain Investment Management Agreements
As described in Notes 2 and 7 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets
balance related to investment management agreements of $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2019 includes certain
investment management agreements with a total carrying value of $299.6 million as of December 31, 2019, net of an
$18 million impairment recognized in 2019, that management tested for impairment during the year ended December 31,
2019. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually on October 1, or more frequently if changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. If the fair value is less than the carrying amount, an
impairment is recognized. Management used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value. Some
of the inputs used in the discounted cash flow model required significant management judgement, including the discount
rate, terminal growth rate, and forecasted financial results.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment of
indefinite-lived intangible assets related to certain investment management agreements is a critical audit matter are there
was significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement of the intangible assets, which in
turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures to evaluate management’s
cash flow projections and significant assumptions, including the discount rate, terminal growth rate, and forecasted
financial results. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to
assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our
overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls
relating to the impairment assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including controls over the valuation of the
indefinite-lived intangible assets related to certain investment management agreements. These procedures also included,
among others (i) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness
of the discounted cash flow model, (iii) testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the
model, and (iv) evaluating the significant assumptions used by management, including the discount rate, terminal growth
56
57
Table of Contents Table of Contents
rate, and forecasted financial results. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the discount rate, terminal growth
rate, and forecasted financial results involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable
considering (i) the current and past performance of the investment companies subject to the investment management
agreements, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, and (iii) whether these assumptions were
consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were
used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and certain significant assumptions,
including the discount rate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
58
Table of Contents
rate, and forecasted financial results. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the discount rate, terminal growth
rate, and forecasted financial results involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable
considering (i) the current and past performance of the investment companies subject to the investment management
agreements, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, and (iii) whether these assumptions were
consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were
used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and certain significant assumptions,
including the discount rate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 26, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Janus Henderson Group plc
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Janus Henderson Group plc and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) as of
December 31, 2018, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of cash
flows, and consolidated statements of changes in equity for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2018, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the
consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as of
December 31, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended
December 31, 2018 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Group’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting
firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
London, UK
February 26, 2019
We served as the Group's auditor from 2014 to 2019
58
59
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
JHG management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over JHG’s financial
reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. JHG’s internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
JHG management has assessed the effectiveness of JHG’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, JHG management used the framework set
forth in the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework (2013). Based on the assessment using those criteria, JHG management determined that as of December 31,
2019, JHG’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
JHG’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, audited the effectiveness of JHG’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as stated in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-
K.
February 26, 2020
60
Table of Contents
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
JHG management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over JHG’s financial
reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. JHG’s internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
JHG management has assessed the effectiveness of JHG’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2019. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, JHG management used the framework set
forth in the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework (2013). Based on the assessment using those criteria, JHG management determined that as of December 31,
2019, JHG’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
JHG’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, audited the effectiveness of JHG’s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, as stated in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-
K.
February 26, 2020
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Millions, Except Share Data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Fees and other receivables
OEIC and unit trust receivables
Assets of consolidated VIEs:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Other current assets
Other current assets
Total current assets
Non-current assets:
Property, equipment and software, net
Intangible assets, net
Goodwill
Retirement benefit asset, net
Other non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Current portion of accrued compensation, benefits and staff costs
OEIC and unit trust payables
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities:
Accrued compensation, benefits and staff costs
Long-term debt
Deferred tax liabilities, net
Retirement benefit obligations, net
Other non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 19)
December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
$
$
$
$
$
$
733.9
253.5
334.8
131.7
62.6
924.8
23.5
116.0
2,580.8
84.7
3,088.6
1,504.3
214.0
149.3
7,621.7
246.0
335.7
130.9
57.1
769.7
59.4
316.2
729.1
4.4
158.8
2,037.6
880.4
291.8
309.2
144.4
36.2
282.7
5.0
69.4
2,019.1
69.5
3,123.3
1,478.0
206.5
15.5
6,911.9
233.2
345.4
143.3
6.5
728.4
54.7
319.1
729.9
3.7
79.2
1,915.0
REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
677.9
136.1
EQUITY
Common stock ($1.50 par, 480,000,000 shares authorized and 186,975,693 and 196,412,764 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively)
Additional paid-in-capital
Treasury shares (3,545,812 and 4,523,802 shares held, respectively)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Retained earnings
Total shareholders’ equity
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests
Total equity
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity
$
280.5
3,828.5
(139.5)
(367.1)
1,284.1
4,886.5
19.7
4,906.2
7,621.7
$
294.6
3,824.5
(170.8)
(423.5)
1,314.5
4,839.3
21.5
4,860.8
6,911.9
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
60
61
Table of Contents Table of Contents
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Data)
Revenue:
Management fees
Performance fees
Shareowner servicing fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Operating expenses:
Employee compensation and benefits
Long-term incentive plans
Distribution expenses
Investment administration
Marketing
General, administrative and occupancy
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Interest expense
Investment gains (losses), net
Other non-operating income (expenses), net
Income before taxes
Income tax (provision) benefit
Net income
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to JHG
Earnings per share attributable to JHG common shareholders:
Basic
Diluted
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities
Actuarial gains (losses)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to JHG
Total comprehensive income
Total comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Total comprehensive income attributable to JHG
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
1,792.3 $
17.6
185.4
197.1
2,192.4
1,947.4 $
7.1
154.2
197.7
2,306.4
1,480.9
103.9
87.3
146.2
1,818.3
602.5
184.3
444.3
47.9
31.1
260.8
80.6
1,651.5
540.9
(15.1)
34.2
23.5
583.5
(137.8)
445.7
(18.1)
427.6 $
613.0
188.6
446.7
46.9
37.9
253.7
69.8
1,656.6
649.8
(15.7)
(40.9)
68.6
661.8
(162.2)
499.6
24.2
523.8 $
543.3
150.8
351.9
43.8
31.2
202.2
52.8
1,376.0
442.3
(11.9)
18.0
(1.0)
447.4
211.0
658.4
(2.9)
655.5
2.21 $
2.21 $
2.62 $
2.61 $
3.97
3.93
74.7 $
—
(5.6)
69.1
(12.7)
56.4 $
514.8 $
(30.8)
484.0 $
(124.3) $
—
3.7
(120.6)
1.4
(119.2) $
379.0 $
25.6
404.6 $
125.0
(2.0)
(11.1)
111.9
20.8
132.7
770.3
17.9
788.2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
62
Table of Contents
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Data)
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Millions)
Revenue:
Management fees
Performance fees
Other revenue
Total revenue
Operating expenses:
Shareowner servicing fees
Long-term incentive plans
Distribution expenses
Investment administration
Marketing
Employee compensation and benefits
General, administrative and occupancy
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Interest expense
Investment gains (losses), net
Other non-operating income (expenses), net
Income before taxes
Income tax (provision) benefit
Net income
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to JHG
Earnings per share attributable to JHG common shareholders:
Basic
Diluted
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation gains (losses)
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities
Actuarial gains (losses)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Other comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to JHG
Total comprehensive income
Total comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
Total comprehensive income attributable to JHG
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
1,792.3 $
1,947.4 $
1,480.9
2,192.4
2,306.4
1,818.3
17.6
185.4
197.1
602.5
184.3
444.3
47.9
31.1
260.8
80.6
1,651.5
540.9
(15.1)
34.2
23.5
583.5
(137.8)
445.7
(18.1)
7.1
154.2
197.7
613.0
188.6
446.7
46.9
37.9
253.7
69.8
1,656.6
649.8
(15.7)
(40.9)
68.6
661.8
(162.2)
499.6
24.2
103.9
87.3
146.2
543.3
150.8
351.9
43.8
31.2
202.2
52.8
1,376.0
442.3
(11.9)
18.0
(1.0)
447.4
211.0
658.4
(2.9)
$
427.6 $
523.8 $
655.5
$
$
2.21 $
2.21 $
2.62 $
2.61 $
3.97
3.93
$
74.7 $
(124.3) $
—
(5.6)
69.1
(12.7)
—
3.7
(120.6)
1.4
$
$
56.4 $
(119.2) $
514.8 $
379.0 $
(30.8)
25.6
$
484.0 $
404.6 $
125.0
(2.0)
(11.1)
111.9
20.8
132.7
770.3
17.9
788.2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED FOR):
Operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Impairment of intangible asset
Deferred income taxes
Stock-based compensation plan expense
Gains from equity-method investments, net
Impairment of ROU operating asset
Investment (gains) losses, net
Contingent consideration fair value adjustment
Contributions to pension plans in excess of costs recognized
Gain from BNP Paribas transaction
Dai-ichi option fair value adjustments
Other, net
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
OEIC and unit trust receivables and payables
Other assets
Other accruals and liabilities
Net operating activities
Investing activities:
Cash acquired from acquisition of JCG
Proceeds from (purchase of):
Investment securities, net
Property, equipment and software
Investment securities by consolidated seeded investment products, net
Investment income received by consolidated funds
Cash movement on deconsolidation of consolidated funds
Proceeds from BNP Paribas transaction, net
Cash received (paid) on settled hedges, net
Dividends received from equity-method investments
Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interests
Proceeds from sale of Volantis
Net investing activities
Financing activities:
Settlement of convertible note hedge
Settlement of stock warrant
Proceeds from issuance of options
Proceeds from stock-based compensation plans
Purchase of common stock for stock-based compensation plans
Purchase of common stock for share buyback program
Dividends paid to shareholders
Repayment of long-term debt
Payment of contingent consideration
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
Third-party sales (redemptions) in consolidated seeded investment products, net
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
Net financing activities
Cash and cash equivalents:
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
Net change
At beginning of period
At end of period
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents held in consolidated VIEs
Total cash and cash equivalents
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
445.7
$
499.6
$
658.4
62.6
18.0
(4.7)
74.2
—
4.7
(34.2)
(20.0)
1.0
—
—
(11.1)
0.4
(16.4)
(57.0)
463.2
—
1.5
(37.8)
(320.8)
—
—
—
(34.9)
0.4
—
2.3
(389.3)
—
—
—
—
(39.0)
(199.9)
(272.4)
—
(14.1)
(1.3)
320.8
(1.1)
(207.0)
13.0
(120.1)
916.6
796.5
14.6
160.0
733.9
62.6
796.5
$
$
$
$
$
62.6
7.2
(10.5)
82.4
—
—
40.9
—
(16.1)
(22.3)
(26.8)
4.8
3.9
134.5
(89.4)
670.8
—
35.1
(29.1)
36.5
—
—
36.5
16.0
—
—
5.9
100.9
—
—
—
8.6
(86.6)
(99.8)
(275.1)
(95.3)
(22.7)
(8.1)
(36.5)
(1.3)
(616.8)
(32.5)
122.4
794.2
916.6
14.8
184.7
880.4
36.2
916.6
$
$
$
$
$
52.8
—
(355.6)
67.4
0.6
—
(18.0)
—
(20.9)
—
—
7.2
(0.9)
(117.8)
170.9
444.1
417.2
7.5
(17.7)
141.4
7.9
(11.2)
—
(23.7)
0.2
(2.6)
0.5
519.5
59.3
(47.8)
25.7
6.0
(52.1)
—
(256.0)
(92.5)
—
(5.0)
(141.4)
(0.9)
(504.7)
12.1
471.0
323.2
794.2
8.0
113.1
760.1
34.1
794.2
$
$
$
$
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
62
63
Table of Contents Table of Contents
C
L
P
P
U
O
R
G
N
O
S
R
E
D
N
E
H
S
U
N
A
J
Y
T
I
U
Q
E
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
)
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
M
n
i
s
t
n
u
o
m
A
(
—
0
.
7
5
6
9
.
1
1
1
)
9
.
5
5
2
(
)
6
.
0
(
4
.
1
3
3
.
3
1
)
4
.
0
(
)
8
.
1
5
(
)
3
.
2
2
(
)
7
.
2
(
)
1
.
2
5
(
0
.
2
8
6
,
2
—
—
0
.
6
4
.
7
6
2
.
0
5
.
5
7
8
,
4
7
.
4
1
5
7
.
5
7
8
,
4
)
2
.
9
1
1
(
)
2
.
0
7
2
(
)
6
.
7
(
)
8
.
9
9
(
8
.
0
)
0
.
8
3
(
)
6
.
6
8
(
—
6
.
8
4
.
2
8
4
.
6
5
5
.
6
2
4
)
4
.
2
7
2
(
)
9
.
9
9
1
(
8
.
0
6
8
,
4
)
7
.
0
(
3
.
0
)
0
.
9
3
(
—
2
.
4
7
l
a
t
o
T
y
t
i
u
q
e
3
.
2
9
6
,
1
$
—
5
.
1
8
.
4
4
—
)
6
.
0
(
)
8
.
0
2
(
—
—
3
.
3
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
.
8
3
)
1
.
9
(
2
.
8
3
—
—
—
)
6
.
7
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
1
.
1
(
5
.
1
2
—
—
—
)
7
.
0
(
—
—
—
—
$
—
8
.
4
6
7
—
5
.
5
5
6
)
0
.
6
5
2
(
—
—
—
)
4
.
0
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
.
9
—
)
4
.
2
2
(
7
.
2
4
.
1
5
1
,
1
8
.
3
2
5
1
.
4
5
1
,
1
—
)
8
.
3
9
(
)
4
.
0
7
2
(
—
8
.
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
.
7
2
4
5
.
4
1
3
,
1
)
5
.
2
7
2
(
)
8
.
5
8
1
(
—
3
.
0
—
—
—
$
)
5
.
4
3
4
(
$
)
1
.
5
5
1
(
$
9
.
7
3
2
,
1
$
4
.
4
3
2
$
8
.
1
3
1
,
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7
.
2
3
1
—
)
5
.
2
(
)
8
.
1
0
3
(
)
3
.
4
0
3
(
)
2
.
9
1
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4
.
6
5
)
5
.
3
2
4
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
1
.
2
5
(
—
—
4
.
1
5
—
—
—
)
8
.
5
5
1
(
)
8
.
5
5
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
1
.
9
4
(
1
.
4
3
)
8
.
0
7
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
2
.
5
(
5
.
6
3
—
—
—
—
1
.
0
—
—
—
4
.
1
3
)
8
.
1
5
(
)
3
.
2
2
(
)
7
.
2
(
—
2
.
1
5
5
,
2
6
.
4
6
)
0
.
9
2
(
0
.
6
5
.
7
5
—
9
.
2
4
8
,
3
9
.
2
4
8
,
3
—
—
2
.
0
—
—
—
)
0
.
8
3
(
)
5
.
7
3
(
)
1
.
4
3
(
6
.
8
4
.
2
8
5
.
4
2
8
,
3
—
—
1
.
0
—
—
—
)
8
.
3
3
(
)
5
.
6
3
(
2
.
4
7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
6
.
4
6
(
8
.
0
3
1
—
6
.
0
0
3
6
.
0
0
3
—
—
—
)
0
.
6
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
.
4
9
2
)
1
.
4
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
.
7
8
—
4
.
0
0
2
4
.
0
0
2
—
—
—
)
0
.
4
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
4
.
9
(
4
.
6
9
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
6
.
8
1
0
,
1
(
e
l
b
a
m
e
e
d
e
r
n
o
N
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
e
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
o
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
s
s
o
l
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
T
s
e
r
a
h
s
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
n
i
-
d
i
a
p
l
a
t
i
p
a
c
n
o
m
m
o
C
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
r
e
b
m
u
N
s
e
r
a
h
s
2
.
6
0
9
,
4
$
7
.
9
1
$
1
.
4
8
2
,
1
$
)
1
.
7
6
3
(
$
)
5
.
9
3
1
(
$
5
.
8
2
8
,
3
$
5
.
0
8
2
$
0
.
7
8
1
-
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
s
e
v
n
u
r
e
d
n
u
s
e
c
i
v
r
e
s
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
b
m
o
c
t
s
o
p
r
o
f
n
o
i
t
a
r
e
d
i
s
n
o
c
t
s
u
j
d
A
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
e
l
b
a
m
e
e
d
e
r
o
t
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
F
G
C
J
f
o
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
n
o
d
e
z
i
n
g
o
c
e
r
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
d
f
o
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
t
e
s
d
n
a
t
b
e
d
e
l
b
i
t
r
e
v
n
o
c
f
o
s
n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
R
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
d
f
o
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
t
e
s
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
r
t
b
e
d
e
l
b
i
t
r
e
v
n
o
c
f
o
t
c
a
p
m
i
x
a
T
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
r
o
f
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
)
e
r
a
h
s
r
e
p
5
1
9
0
.
0
£
d
n
a
4
6
.
0
$
(
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
)
s
s
o
l
(
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
n
o
d
e
r
i
u
q
c
a
s
t
n
e
m
u
r
t
s
n
i
e
v
i
t
a
v
i
r
e
D
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D
7
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
n
o
i
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
e
r
a
h
S
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
e
l
p
i
c
n
i
r
p
g
n
i
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
n
i
e
g
n
a
h
c
f
o
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
t
c
e
f
f
e
-
e
v
i
t
a
l
u
m
u
C
7
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
e
u
l
a
v
r
a
p
f
o
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
e
r
d
n
a
n
o
i
t
a
n
i
m
o
n
e
d
e
R
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
m
o
r
f
s
d
e
e
c
o
r
P
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
g
n
i
t
s
e
V
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
)
e
r
a
h
s
r
e
p
0
4
.
1
$
(
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D
m
a
r
g
o
r
p
k
c
a
b
y
u
b
e
r
a
h
S
7
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
b
d
e
t
s
u
j
d
A
s
s
o
l
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
r
o
f
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
t
b
e
d
e
l
b
i
t
r
e
v
n
o
c
f
o
s
n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
R
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
e
l
b
a
m
e
e
d
e
r
o
t
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
F
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
m
o
r
f
s
d
e
e
c
o
r
P
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
g
n
i
t
s
e
V
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
r
o
f
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
e
l
b
a
m
e
e
d
e
r
o
t
s
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
a
e
u
l
a
v
r
i
a
F
)
e
r
a
h
s
r
e
p
4
4
.
1
$
(
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D
m
a
r
g
o
r
p
k
c
a
b
y
u
b
e
r
a
h
S
s
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
g
n
i
t
s
e
V
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
n
a
l
p
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
9
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
e
s
e
h
t
f
o
t
r
a
p
l
a
r
g
e
t
n
i
n
a
e
r
a
s
e
t
o
n
g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a
e
h
T
4
6
Table of Contents
JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Description of the Business
As used herein, “JHG,” “we,” "us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Janus Henderson Group plc and its subsidiaries,
unless indicated otherwise.
JHG is an independent global asset manager, specializing in active investment across all major asset classes. We actively
manage a broad range of investment products for institutional and retail investors across five capabilities: Equities, Fixed
Income, Quantitative Equities, Multi-Asset and Alternatives.
JHG is a public limited company incorporated in Jersey, Channel Islands, and is tax-resident and domiciled in the UK.
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE and our CDIs are traded on the ASX.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to U.S. GAAP and include all majority-owned
subsidiaries and consolidated seeded investment products. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation. Events subsequent to the balance sheet date have been evaluated for inclusion in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements through the issuance date.
Prior to the Merger, Henderson’s functional currency was GBP. After consideration of numerous factors, such as the
denomination of its shares, payments of dividends and our main economic environment, management concluded that the
post-Merger functional currency of JHG is USD.
Certain prior year amounts in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been reclassified to conform
to current year presentation. Specifically, revenue amounts related to certain transfer agent and administrative activities
performed for investment products that were previously classified in other revenue were reclassified to shareowner
servicing fees. There is no change to consolidated total revenue, operating income, net income or cash flows as a result
of this change in classification.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and the differences could be material. Our
significant estimates relate to investment securities, acquisition accounting, goodwill and intangible assets, retirement
benefit assets and obligations, contingent consideration, equity compensation and income taxes.
Segment Information
We are a global asset manager and manage a range of investment products, operating across various product lines,
distribution channels and geographic regions. However, resources are allocated and the business is managed by the chief
operating decision-maker, the CEO, on an aggregated basis. Strategic and financial management decisions are
determined centrally by the CEO and, on this basis, we operate as a single segment investment management business.
65
Table of Contents
Consolidation of Investment Products
We perform periodic consolidation analyses of our seeded investment products to determine if the product is a VIE or a
VRE. Factors considered in this assessment include the product’s legal organization, the product’s capital structure and
equity ownership, and any de facto agent implications of our involvement with the product. Investment products that are
determined to be VIEs are consolidated if we are the primary beneficiary of the product. VREs are consolidated if we
hold the majority voting interest. Upon the occurrence of certain events (such as contributions and redemptions, either by
JHG or third parties, or amendments to the governing documents of our investment products), management reviews and
reconsiders its previous conclusion regarding the status of a product as a VIE or a VRE. Additionally, management
continually reconsiders whether we are considered a VIE’s primary beneficiary, and thus consolidates such product.
Variable Interest Entities
Certain investment products for which a controlling financial interest is achieved through arrangements that do not
involve or are not directly linked to voting interests are considered VIEs. We review factors, including whether or not (i)
the product has equity that is sufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated support from
other parties and (ii) the equity holders at risk have the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns
and the right to direct the activities of the product that most significantly impact the product’s economic performance, to
determine if the investment product is a VIE. We re-evaluate such factors as facts and circumstances change.
We consolidate a VIE if we are the VIE’s primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is defined as the
variable interest holder that has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest is defined as (i)
the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and (ii) the
obligation to absorb losses of the product or the right to receive benefits from the product that potentially could be
significant to the VIE.
We are the manager of various types of seeded investment products, which may be considered VIEs. Our involvement in
financing the operations of the VIEs is generally limited to its investments in the products.
VIEs are generally subject to consolidation by us at lower ownership percentages than the 50% threshold applied to
VREs and are also subject to specific disclosure requirements.
Voting Rights Entities
We consolidate seeded investment products accounted for as VREs when we are considered to control such products,
which generally exists if we have a greater than 50% voting equity interest.
Property, Equipment and Software
Property, equipment and software are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful life of the related assets (or the lease term, if shorter). Depreciation expense totaled $23.5 million,
$24.7 million and $24.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Property,
equipment and software are summarized as follows (in millions):
Furniture, fixtures and computer equipment
Leasehold improvements
Computer software
Property, equipment and software, gross
Accumulated depreciation
Property, equipment and software, net
Depreciation
period
3-10 years
Over the shorter of 20
years or the period of
the lease
3-7 years
66
December 31,
2019
2018
$
36.1 $
31.3
38.0
83.1
35.3
65.6
$ 157.2 $ 132.2
(62.7)
69.5
(72.5)
84.7 $
$
Table of Contents
Consolidation of Investment Products
We perform periodic consolidation analyses of our seeded investment products to determine if the product is a VIE or a
VRE. Factors considered in this assessment include the product’s legal organization, the product’s capital structure and
equity ownership, and any de facto agent implications of our involvement with the product. Investment products that are
determined to be VIEs are consolidated if we are the primary beneficiary of the product. VREs are consolidated if we
hold the majority voting interest. Upon the occurrence of certain events (such as contributions and redemptions, either by
JHG or third parties, or amendments to the governing documents of our investment products), management reviews and
reconsiders its previous conclusion regarding the status of a product as a VIE or a VRE. Additionally, management
continually reconsiders whether we are considered a VIE’s primary beneficiary, and thus consolidates such product.
Variable Interest Entities
Certain investment products for which a controlling financial interest is achieved through arrangements that do not
involve or are not directly linked to voting interests are considered VIEs. We review factors, including whether or not (i)
the product has equity that is sufficient to permit it to finance its activities without additional subordinated support from
other parties and (ii) the equity holders at risk have the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns
and the right to direct the activities of the product that most significantly impact the product’s economic performance, to
determine if the investment product is a VIE. We re-evaluate such factors as facts and circumstances change.
We consolidate a VIE if we are the VIE’s primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is defined as the
variable interest holder that has a controlling financial interest in the VIE. A controlling financial interest is defined as (i)
the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and (ii) the
obligation to absorb losses of the product or the right to receive benefits from the product that potentially could be
significant to the VIE.
We are the manager of various types of seeded investment products, which may be considered VIEs. Our involvement in
financing the operations of the VIEs is generally limited to its investments in the products.
VIEs are generally subject to consolidation by us at lower ownership percentages than the 50% threshold applied to
VREs and are also subject to specific disclosure requirements.
Voting Rights Entities
Property, Equipment and Software
Property, equipment and software are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful life of the related assets (or the lease term, if shorter). Depreciation expense totaled $23.5 million,
$24.7 million and $24.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Property,
equipment and software are summarized as follows (in millions):
Depreciation
period
3-10 years
December 31,
2019
2018
$
36.1 $
31.3
Furniture, fixtures and computer equipment
Leasehold improvements
Computer software
Property, equipment and software, gross
Accumulated depreciation
Property, equipment and software, net
Over the shorter of 20
years or the period of
the lease
3-7 years
38.0
83.1
35.3
65.6
$ 157.2 $ 132.2
(72.5)
(62.7)
$
84.7 $
69.5
Computer software is recorded at cost and depreciated over its estimated useful life. Internal and external costs incurred
in connection with researching or obtaining computer software for internal use are expensed as incurred during the
preliminary project stage, as are post-implementation training and maintenance costs. Internal and external costs
incurred for internal use software during the application development stage are capitalized until such time that the
software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Application development stage costs are depreciated on
a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the software.
We evaluate our property, equipment and software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The evaluation is based on an estimate of the future
cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposal. If expected future undiscounted cash
flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess of
the carrying amount of the asset over the fair value of the asset. There were no impairments of property, equipment and
software for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Deferred Commissions
Initial sales commissions paid to and received from financial intermediaries on sales of certain wholesale products are
deferred and amortized over various periods, not exceeding four years. The amortization period is based on the average
expected life of the product on which the commission is received. Deferred commissions are recognized as components
of other current assets and of accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Equity Method Investments
Our investment in equity method investees, where we do not control the investee but can exert significant influence over
the financial and operating policies (generally considered to be ownership between 20% and 50%), as well as in joint
ventures where there is joint control (and in both cases, where we are not the primary beneficiary of a VIE), are
accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
Investments are initially recognized at cost when purchased for cash, or at the fair value of shares received where
acquired as part of a wider transaction. The investments are subsequently carried at cost adjusted for our share of net
income or loss and other changes in comprehensive income of the equity method investee, less any dividends or
distributions received by us. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income includes our share of net income or
loss for the year, or period of ownership, if shorter, within other non-operating income (expenses), net.
We consolidate seeded investment products accounted for as VREs when we are considered to control such products,
which generally exists if we have a greater than 50% voting equity interest.
Financial Instruments
Financial assets are recognized at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets when we become a party to the
contractual provisions of an instrument. The fair value recognized is adjusted for transaction costs, except for financial
assets classified as trading where transaction costs are recognized immediately in net income. Financial assets are
derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or where they have been
transferred and we have also transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.
Purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized at the trade date. Delivery and settlement terms are usually
determined by established practices in the market concerned.
Debt securities, equity securities and holdings in pooled funds are measured at subsequent reporting dates at fair value.
We determine the classification of its financial assets on initial recognition.
Unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between the fair value of the financial asset at the reporting date and
cost or, if these have been previously revalued, the fair value at the last reporting date. Realized gains and losses on
financial assets are calculated as the difference between the net sales proceeds and cost or amortized cost using the
specific identification method.
66
67
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Financial liabilities, excluding contingent consideration, derivatives, fund deferral liabilities and redeemable
noncontrolling interests in consolidated funds which are stated at fair value, are stated at amortized cost using the
effective interest rate method. Financial liabilities stated at amortized cost include our long-term debt. Amortized cost is
calculated by taking into account any issue costs and any discount or premium on settlement. Financial liabilities cease
to be recognized when the obligation under the liability has been discharged or cancelled or has expired.
Investment Securities
Seeded Investment Products
We periodically add new investment strategies to our investment product offerings by providing the initial cash
investment or “seeding.” The primary purpose of seeded investment products is to generate an investment performance
track record in a product to attract third-party investors. Seeded investment products are initially consolidated and the
individual securities within the portfolio are accounted for as trading securities. The change in fair value of seeded
investment products is recorded in investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. Noncontrolling interests in seeded investment products represent third-party ownership interests and are
included in investment securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These assets are not available for general
corporate purposes and may be redeemed by the third parties at any time.
Refer to the consolidation discussion in this note for information regarding the consolidation of certain seeded
investment products.
We may redeem invested seed capital for a variety of reasons, including when third-party investments in the relevant
product are sufficient to sustain the given investment strategy. The length of time we hold a majority interest in a product
varies based on a number of factors, including market demand, market conditions and investment performance.
Investments in Advised Mutual Funds and Investments Related to the Economic Hedging of Deferred Compensation
We grant mutual fund share awards to employees that are indexed to certain funds managed by us. Upon vesting,
participants receive the value of the mutual fund share awards adjusted for gains or losses attributable to the mutual
funds to which the award was indexed, subject to tax withholding, or participants receive shares in the mutual fund.
When investments in our fund products are purchased and held against deferred compensation liabilities, any movement
in the fair value of the assets and corresponding movements in the deferred compensation liability are recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We maintain deferred compensation plans for certain highly compensated employees and members of its Board of
Directors. Eligible participants may defer a portion of their compensation and have the ability to earn a return by
indexing their deferrals to mutual funds managed by us and our subsidiaries. We make no contributions to the plans. To
protect against market variability of the liability, we create an economic hedge by investing in mutual funds that are
consistent with the deferred amounts and mutual fund elections of the participants. Such investments remain assets of
JHG. Changes in market value of the liability to participants are recognized as long-term incentive compensation in our
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, and changes in the market value of the mutual fund securities are
recognized in investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Other Investment Securities
Other investment securities primarily represent investments in our fund products held by employee benefit trusts, certain
investments in unconsolidated seed capital investments and certain investments in consolidated funds. Gains and losses
arising from changes in the fair value of these securities are included within investments gains (losses), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Where investments in our fund products are held against
outstanding deferred compensation liabilities, any movement in the fair value of these assets and corresponding
movements in the deferred compensation liability are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income.
68
Table of Contents Financial liabilities, excluding contingent consideration, derivatives, fund deferral liabilities and redeemable
noncontrolling interests in consolidated funds which are stated at fair value, are stated at amortized cost using the
effective interest rate method. Financial liabilities stated at amortized cost include our long-term debt. Amortized cost is
calculated by taking into account any issue costs and any discount or premium on settlement. Financial liabilities cease
to be recognized when the obligation under the liability has been discharged or cancelled or has expired.
Investment Securities
Seeded Investment Products
We periodically add new investment strategies to our investment product offerings by providing the initial cash
investment or “seeding.” The primary purpose of seeded investment products is to generate an investment performance
track record in a product to attract third-party investors. Seeded investment products are initially consolidated and the
individual securities within the portfolio are accounted for as trading securities. The change in fair value of seeded
investment products is recorded in investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. Noncontrolling interests in seeded investment products represent third-party ownership interests and are
included in investment securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These assets are not available for general
corporate purposes and may be redeemed by the third parties at any time.
Refer to the consolidation discussion in this note for information regarding the consolidation of certain seeded
investment products.
We may redeem invested seed capital for a variety of reasons, including when third-party investments in the relevant
product are sufficient to sustain the given investment strategy. The length of time we hold a majority interest in a product
varies based on a number of factors, including market demand, market conditions and investment performance.
Investments in Advised Mutual Funds and Investments Related to the Economic Hedging of Deferred Compensation
We grant mutual fund share awards to employees that are indexed to certain funds managed by us. Upon vesting,
participants receive the value of the mutual fund share awards adjusted for gains or losses attributable to the mutual
funds to which the award was indexed, subject to tax withholding, or participants receive shares in the mutual fund.
When investments in our fund products are purchased and held against deferred compensation liabilities, any movement
in the fair value of the assets and corresponding movements in the deferred compensation liability are recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We maintain deferred compensation plans for certain highly compensated employees and members of its Board of
Directors. Eligible participants may defer a portion of their compensation and have the ability to earn a return by
indexing their deferrals to mutual funds managed by us and our subsidiaries. We make no contributions to the plans. To
protect against market variability of the liability, we create an economic hedge by investing in mutual funds that are
consistent with the deferred amounts and mutual fund elections of the participants. Such investments remain assets of
JHG. Changes in market value of the liability to participants are recognized as long-term incentive compensation in our
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, and changes in the market value of the mutual fund securities are
recognized in investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Other Investment Securities
Other investment securities primarily represent investments in our fund products held by employee benefit trusts, certain
investments in unconsolidated seed capital investments and certain investments in consolidated funds. Gains and losses
arising from changes in the fair value of these securities are included within investments gains (losses), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Where investments in our fund products are held against
outstanding deferred compensation liabilities, any movement in the fair value of these assets and corresponding
movements in the deferred compensation liability are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income.
Trade Receivables
Trade receivables, which generally have 30-day payment terms, are initially recognized at fair value, which is normally
equivalent to the invoice amount. When the time value of money is material, the fair value is discounted. Provision for
specific doubtful accounts is made when there is evidence that we may not be able to recover balances in full. Balances
are written off when the receivable amount is deemed uncollectable.
OEIC and Unit Trust Receivables and Payables
OEIC and unit trust receivables and payables are in relation to the purchase of units/shares (by investors) and the
liquidation of units/shares (owned by trustees). The amounts are dependent on the level of trading and fund switches in
the four working days leading up to the end of the period. Since they are held with different counterparties, the amounts
are presented gross on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents primarily consist of cash held at banks, on-demand deposits, highly liquid short-term
government securities and investments in money market instruments with a maturity date of three months or less. Cash
balances maintained by consolidated VREs are not considered legally restricted and are included in cash and cash
equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash balances held by consolidated VIEs are disclosed separately as a
component of assets of consolidated VIEs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Derivative Instruments
We may, from time to time, use derivative financial instruments to mitigate price, interest rate, foreign currency and
credit risk. We do not designate derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes, with the exception of certain
foreign currency forward contracts used for net investment hedging.
Derivative instruments are measured at fair value and classified as either other current assets or accounts payable and
accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded
within investment gains (losses), net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Changes in fair value of
foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges for accounting purposes are recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income under net investment hedge accounting.
Our consolidated seed investments may also be party to derivative instruments. These derivative instruments are
disclosed separately from our corporate derivative instruments. Refer to Note 6 – Investment Securities.
Leases
We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets are included in other
non-current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The current and non-current portions of operating lease liabilities
are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and in other non-current liabilities, respectively.
Finance lease ROU assets are included in property, equipment and software, net, and finance lease liabilities are
included in other non-current liabilities.
ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation
to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at
commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not
provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement
date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease
payments made and excludes lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease
when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
68
69
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests that are not subject to redemption rights are classified in permanent equity.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
are measured at the estimated fair value as of the balance sheet date. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated seed
investments are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests where there is an obligation on the fund to repurchase
units at the investor’s request. Refer to Note 14 – Noncontrolling Interests for further information.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as
publicly traded securities and derivatives) is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market
price used for financial instruments is the last traded market price for both financial assets and financial liabilities where
the last traded price falls within the bid ask spread. In circumstances where the last traded price is not within the bid ask
spread, management will determine the point within the bid ask spread that is most representative of fair value current
bid price. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation
techniques commonly used by market participants, including the use of comparable recent arm’s length transactions,
discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models. Estimating fair value requires significant management
judgment, including benchmarking to similar instruments with observable market data and applying appropriate
discounts that reflect differences between the securities that we are valuing and the selected benchmark.
Measurements of fair value are classified within a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable.
The valuation hierarchy contains three levels:
● Level 1—Valuation inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets.
● Level 2—Valuation inputs are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and other observable inputs
directly or indirectly related to the asset or liability being measured.
● Level 3—Valuation inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The valuation of an asset or liability may involve inputs from more than one level of the hierarchy. The level in the fair
value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Level 1 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 1 fair value measurements consist mostly of seeded investment products, investments in advised mutual
funds, cash equivalents and investments related to deferred compensation plans with quoted market prices in active
markets. The fair value level of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying securities of
the product. The fair value level of unconsolidated seeded investment products is determined using the underlying inputs
used in the calculation of the NAV of each product.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 2 fair value measurements consist mostly of consolidated seeded investment products and our long-term debt.
The fair value of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying securities of the product. The
fair value of our long-term debt is determined using broker quotes and recent trading activity, which are considered
Level 2 inputs.
70
Table of Contents
Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests that are not subject to redemption rights are classified in permanent equity.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests are classified outside of permanent equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and
are measured at the estimated fair value as of the balance sheet date. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated seed
investments are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests where there is an obligation on the fund to repurchase
units at the investor’s request. Refer to Note 14 – Noncontrolling Interests for further information.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets (such as
publicly traded securities and derivatives) is based on quoted market prices at the reporting date. The quoted market
price used for financial instruments is the last traded market price for both financial assets and financial liabilities where
the last traded price falls within the bid ask spread. In circumstances where the last traded price is not within the bid ask
spread, management will determine the point within the bid ask spread that is most representative of fair value current
bid price. The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined using valuation
techniques commonly used by market participants, including the use of comparable recent arm’s length transactions,
discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models. Estimating fair value requires significant management
judgment, including benchmarking to similar instruments with observable market data and applying appropriate
discounts that reflect differences between the securities that we are valuing and the selected benchmark.
Measurements of fair value are classified within a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable.
The valuation hierarchy contains three levels:
● Level 1—Valuation inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets.
● Level 2—Valuation inputs are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not
active, quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and other observable inputs
directly or indirectly related to the asset or liability being measured.
● Level 3—Valuation inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The valuation of an asset or liability may involve inputs from more than one level of the hierarchy. The level in the fair
value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Level 1 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 1 fair value measurements consist mostly of seeded investment products, investments in advised mutual
funds, cash equivalents and investments related to deferred compensation plans with quoted market prices in active
markets. The fair value level of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying securities of
the product. The fair value level of unconsolidated seeded investment products is determined using the underlying inputs
used in the calculation of the NAV of each product.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 2 fair value measurements consist mostly of consolidated seeded investment products and our long-term debt.
The fair value of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying securities of the product. The
fair value of our long-term debt is determined using broker quotes and recent trading activity, which are considered
Level 2 inputs.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Our assets and liabilities measured at Level 3 are primarily private equity investments, contingent deferred consideration
and deferred compensation liabilities that are held against investments in our fund products, where the significant
valuation inputs are unobservable.
Private equity investments are valued using a combination of the enterprise value/EBITDA multiple method and the
discounted cash flow method. Significant unobservable inputs include discount rates, EBITDA multiple and
price-earnings ratio, taking into account management’s experience and knowledge of market conditions of the specific
industries.
Details of inputs used to calculate the fair value of contingent deferred consideration can be found in Note 10 – Fair
Value Measurements.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
Nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements include goodwill and intangible assets. We measure the fair value of
goodwill and intangible assets on initial recognition using discounted cash flow analysis that requires assumptions
regarding projected future earnings and discount rates. Because of the significance of the unobservable inputs in the fair
value measurements of these assets and liabilities, such measurements are classified as Level 3. See the Goodwill and
Intangible Assets, Net accounting policy set forth within this note for further information.
Income Taxes
We provide for current tax expense according to the tax laws in each jurisdiction in which we operate, using tax rates
and laws that have been enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the financial statement and
income tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted income tax rates that may be in effect when these
differences reverse. The effect of changes in tax rates on our deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized as income
tax within net income in the period that includes the enactment date. Significant management judgment is required in
developing our provision for income taxes, including the valuation allowances that might be required against deferred
tax assets and the evaluation of unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return.
We periodically assess the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and the need for valuation allowances on these assets.
We make these assessments based on the weight of available evidence regarding possible sources of future taxable
income and estimates relating to the future performance of the business that results in taxable income.
In evaluating uncertain tax positions, we consider the probability that the tax benefit can be sustained on examination by
a taxing authority on the basis of its technical merits (“the recognition threshold”). For tax positions meeting this
threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the benefit expected to be realized upon settlement with
the taxing authority on the basis of a cumulative-probability assessment of the possible outcomes. For tax positions not
meeting the recognition threshold, no financial statement benefit is recognized. We recognize the accrual of interest and
penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is measured and recognized based on the five-step process outlined in U.S. GAAP. Revenue is determined
based on the transaction price negotiated with the customer, net of rebates. Management fees, performance fees,
shareowner servicing fees and other revenue are derived from providing professional services to manage investment
products.
70
71
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Management fees are earned over time as services are provided and are generally based on a percentage of the market
value of AUM. These fees are calculated as a percentage of either the daily, month-end or quarter-end average asset
balance in accordance with contractual agreements.
Performance fees are specified in certain fund and client contracts and are based on investment performance either on an
absolute basis or compared to an established index over a specified period of time. Performance fees are generated on
certain management contracts when performance hurdles or other specified criteria are achieved. Performance fees for
all fund ranges and separate accounts are recognized when it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue recognized
will not occur in future periods. There are no performance fee contracts where revenue can be clawed back. There are no
cumulative revenues recognized that would be reversed if all of the existing investments became worthless.
Management fees are primarily received monthly or quarterly, while performance fees are usually received monthly,
quarterly or annually, although the frequency of receipt varies between agreements. Management and performance fee
revenue earned but not yet received is recognized within fees and other receivables on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Shareowner servicing fees are earned for services rendered related to transfer agent and administrative activities
performed for investment products. These services are transferred over time and are generally based on a percentage of
the market value of AUM.
Other revenue includes distribution and servicing fees earned from U.S. mutual funds associated with mutual fund
transfer agent, accounting, shareholder servicing and participant recordkeeping activities. These services are transferred
over time and are generally based on a percentage of the market value of AUM.
U.S. Mutual Fund Performance Fees
The investment management fee paid by each U.S. mutual fund subject to a performance fee is the base management fee
plus or minus a performance fee adjustment as determined by the relative investment performance of the fund compared
to a specified benchmark index. Under the performance-based fee structure, the investment advisory fee paid by each
fund consists of two components: (i) a base fee calculated by applying the contractual fixed rate of the advisory fee to
the fund’s average daily net assets during the previous month, plus or minus (ii) a performance fee adjustment calculated
by applying a variable rate of up to 0.15% to the fund’s average daily net assets during the performance measurement
period. The performance measurement period begins as a trailing period ranging from 12 to 18 months, and each
subsequent month is added to each successive performance measurement period until a 36-month period is achieved. At
that point, the measurement period becomes a rolling 36-month period.
The addition of performance fees to all funds without such fees is subject to the approval of both a majority of the
shareholders of such funds and the funds’ independent board of trustees.
Principal Versus Agent
We utilize third-party intermediaries to fulfill certain performance obligations in our revenue agreements. Generally, we
are deemed to be the principal in these arrangements because we control the investment management and other related
services before they are transferred to customers. Such control is evidenced by our primary responsibility to customers,
the ability to negotiate the third-party contract price and select and direct third-party service providers, or a combination
of these factors. Therefore, distribution and service fee revenues and the related third-party distribution and service
expenses are reported on a gross basis.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses are accrued and recognized as incurred.
72
Table of Contents Management fees are earned over time as services are provided and are generally based on a percentage of the market
value of AUM. These fees are calculated as a percentage of either the daily, month-end or quarter-end average asset
balance in accordance with contractual agreements.
Performance fees are specified in certain fund and client contracts and are based on investment performance either on an
absolute basis or compared to an established index over a specified period of time. Performance fees are generated on
certain management contracts when performance hurdles or other specified criteria are achieved. Performance fees for
all fund ranges and separate accounts are recognized when it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue recognized
will not occur in future periods. There are no performance fee contracts where revenue can be clawed back. There are no
cumulative revenues recognized that would be reversed if all of the existing investments became worthless.
Management fees are primarily received monthly or quarterly, while performance fees are usually received monthly,
quarterly or annually, although the frequency of receipt varies between agreements. Management and performance fee
revenue earned but not yet received is recognized within fees and other receivables on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
the market value of AUM.
U.S. Mutual Fund Performance Fees
Other revenue includes distribution and servicing fees earned from U.S. mutual funds associated with mutual fund
transfer agent, accounting, shareholder servicing and participant recordkeeping activities. These services are transferred
over time and are generally based on a percentage of the market value of AUM.
The investment management fee paid by each U.S. mutual fund subject to a performance fee is the base management fee
plus or minus a performance fee adjustment as determined by the relative investment performance of the fund compared
to a specified benchmark index. Under the performance-based fee structure, the investment advisory fee paid by each
fund consists of two components: (i) a base fee calculated by applying the contractual fixed rate of the advisory fee to
the fund’s average daily net assets during the previous month, plus or minus (ii) a performance fee adjustment calculated
by applying a variable rate of up to 0.15% to the fund’s average daily net assets during the performance measurement
period. The performance measurement period begins as a trailing period ranging from 12 to 18 months, and each
subsequent month is added to each successive performance measurement period until a 36-month period is achieved. At
that point, the measurement period becomes a rolling 36-month period.
The addition of performance fees to all funds without such fees is subject to the approval of both a majority of the
shareholders of such funds and the funds’ independent board of trustees.
Principal Versus Agent
We utilize third-party intermediaries to fulfill certain performance obligations in our revenue agreements. Generally, we
are deemed to be the principal in these arrangements because we control the investment management and other related
services before they are transferred to customers. Such control is evidenced by our primary responsibility to customers,
the ability to negotiate the third-party contract price and select and direct third-party service providers, or a combination
of these factors. Therefore, distribution and service fee revenues and the related third-party distribution and service
expenses are reported on a gross basis.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses are accrued and recognized as incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
We grant stock-based awards to our employees, all of which are classified as equity settled stock-based payments.
Equity settled stock-based payments are measured at the fair value of the shares at the grant date. The awards are
expensed, with a corresponding increase in reserves, on a graded basis over the vesting period. Forfeitures are
recognized as they occur.
The grant date fair value for stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and the grant
date fair value of restricted stock is determined from the market price on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes model
requires management to determine certain variables; the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model
include dividend yield, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected life. The dividend yield and expected
volatility are determined using historical Group data. The risk-free interest rate for options granted is based on the three
year UK treasury coupon at the time of the grant. The expected life of the stock options is the same as the service
conditions applicable to all Group awards.
Shareowner servicing fees are earned for services rendered related to transfer agent and administrative activities
performed for investment products. These services are transferred over time and are generally based on a percentage of
We generally use the Monte Carlo model to determine the fair value of performance-based awards. The assumptions
used in the Monte Carlo model include dividend yield, share price volatility and discount rate.
We had no stock-based compensation costs included in retained earnings during the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, and $9.9 million of costs included in retained earnings during the years ended December 31, 2017. We had no
proceeds from stock-based compensation plans included in retained earnings for the years ended December 31, 2019,
2018 and 2017. Prior to our Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) on April 26, 2017, our articles of association did
not allow us to recognize these items in additional paid-in-capital. A change in our articles of association was approved
at the EGM and from April 26, 2017, all costs in relation to stock-based compensation will be recognized in additional
paid-in-capital. There was no accumulated balance in relation to stock-based compensation plans within retained
earnings as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Commissions
Commissions on management fees are accounted for on an accrual basis and are recognized in the accounting period in
which the associated management fee is earned.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share attributable to our shareholders is calculated by dividing net income (adjusted for the allocation
of earnings to participating restricted stock awards) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. We have
calculated earnings per share using the two-class method. There are some participating restricted stock awards that are
paid non-forfeitable dividends. Under the two-class method, net income attributable to JHG is adjusted for the allocation
of earnings to participating restricted stock awards.
Diluted earnings per share is calculated in a similar way to basic earnings per share but is adjusted for the effect of
potential common shares unless they are anti-dilutive.
Contingent Consideration
Contingent consideration, resulting from business combinations, is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date as part
of the business combination and discounted where the time value of money is material. The determination of the fair
value is based on discounted cash flows, with the key assumptions being the probability of meeting each performance
target and the discount factor applied. When the contingent consideration meets the definition of a financial liability, it is
subsequently re-measured to fair value at each reporting date through other non-operating income. Finance charges,
where discounting has been applied, are also recognized through other non-operating income. See Note 10 – Fair Value
Measurements for further information about contingent consideration on acquisitions taking place during the reporting
period.
72
73
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of acquired companies and is
capitalized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Intangible assets consist primarily of investment management contracts and trademarks acquired as part of business
combinations. Investment management contracts have been identified as separately identifiable intangible assets arising
on the acquisition of subsidiaries or businesses. Such contracts are recognized at the present value of the expected future
cash flows of the investment management contracts at the date of acquisition. Investment management contracts may be
classified as either indefinite-lived investment management contracts or finite-lived client relationships.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets comprise investment management agreements where the agreements are with
investment companies themselves and not with underlying investors. Such contracts are typically renewed indefinitely
and, therefore, we consider the contract life to be indefinite and, as a result, the contracts are not amortized. Definite-
lived intangible assets comprise investment management agreements where the agreements are with the underlying
investor.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill are not amortized. Definite-lived client relationships are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their remaining useful lives.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may be impaired. We have determined that we have one reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing purposes,
which is consistent with internal management reporting and management’s oversight of operations. We may first assess
goodwill for impairment using qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative
impairment test. We chose to forego the qualitative test and instead perform a quantitative impairment test, determining
the enterprise value of the reporting unit and comparing it to our equity balance (carrying amount). If the fair value is
less than the carrying amount, an impairment is recognized. Any impairment is recognized immediately through net
income and cannot subsequently be reversed.
Intangible assets subject to amortization are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable, and indefinite-lived assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently
if changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
Goodwill and intangible assets require significant management estimates and judgment, including the valuation and
expected life determination in connection with the initial purchase price allocation and the ongoing evaluation for
impairment.
Foreign Currency
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the appropriate exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction.
Foreign currency monetary balances at the reporting date are converted at the prevailing exchange rate. Foreign currency
non-monetary balances carried at fair value or cost are translated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value or
cost is determined. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are recognized as a component of net income.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of our operations for which the functional currency is not USD are translated
at exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. Income and expense items are recognized at an average monthly
exchange rate. Exchange differences arising, if any, are taken through other comprehensive income to accumulated other
comprehensive income. Where net investment hedge accounting is applied using foreign currency forward contracts, the
fair value movement on these contracts is also recognized within accumulated other comprehensive income. In the
period in which an operation is disposed of, translation differences previously recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income are recognized as a component of net income.
74
Table of Contents
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
Post-Employment Retirement Benefits
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the identifiable net assets of acquired companies and is
capitalized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Intangible assets consist primarily of investment management contracts and trademarks acquired as part of business
combinations. Investment management contracts have been identified as separately identifiable intangible assets arising
on the acquisition of subsidiaries or businesses. Such contracts are recognized at the present value of the expected future
cash flows of the investment management contracts at the date of acquisition. Investment management contracts may be
classified as either indefinite-lived investment management contracts or finite-lived client relationships.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets comprise investment management agreements where the agreements are with
investment companies themselves and not with underlying investors. Such contracts are typically renewed indefinitely
and, therefore, we consider the contract life to be indefinite and, as a result, the contracts are not amortized. Definite-
lived intangible assets comprise investment management agreements where the agreements are with the underlying
investor.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill are not amortized. Definite-lived client relationships are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their remaining useful lives.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value may be impaired. We have determined that we have one reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing purposes,
which is consistent with internal management reporting and management’s oversight of operations. We may first assess
goodwill for impairment using qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative
impairment test. We chose to forego the qualitative test and instead perform a quantitative impairment test, determining
the enterprise value of the reporting unit and comparing it to our equity balance (carrying amount). If the fair value is
less than the carrying amount, an impairment is recognized. Any impairment is recognized immediately through net
income and cannot subsequently be reversed.
Intangible assets subject to amortization are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable, and indefinite-lived assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently
if changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.
Goodwill and intangible assets require significant management estimates and judgment, including the valuation and
expected life determination in connection with the initial purchase price allocation and the ongoing evaluation for
impairment.
Foreign Currency
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the appropriate exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction.
Foreign currency monetary balances at the reporting date are converted at the prevailing exchange rate. Foreign currency
non-monetary balances carried at fair value or cost are translated at the rates prevailing at the date when the fair value or
cost is determined. Gains and losses arising on retranslation are recognized as a component of net income.
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of our operations for which the functional currency is not USD are translated
at exchange rates prevailing at the reporting date. Income and expense items are recognized at an average monthly
exchange rate. Exchange differences arising, if any, are taken through other comprehensive income to accumulated other
comprehensive income. Where net investment hedge accounting is applied using foreign currency forward contracts, the
fair value movement on these contracts is also recognized within accumulated other comprehensive income. In the
period in which an operation is disposed of, translation differences previously recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income are recognized as a component of net income.
We provide employees with retirement benefits through both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. The assets
of these plans are held separately from our general assets in trustee-administered funds.
Contributions to the defined contribution plan are expensed to employee compensation and benefits on the Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income when they become payable.
Defined benefit obligations and the cost of providing benefits are determined annually by independent qualified actuaries
using the projected unit credit method. Our annual measurement date of the defined benefit plan is December 31. The
defined benefit obligation is measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows using a discount rate
based on AA-rated corporate bond yields of appropriate duration. The plan assets are recognized at fair value. The
funded status of the defined benefit pension plans (the resulting surplus or deficit of defined benefit assets less liabilities)
is recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of any taxes that would be deducted at source.
Actuarial gains and losses arise as a result of the difference between actual experience and actuarial assumptions. We
have adopted the 10% corridor method for recognizing actuarial gains and losses, which means that cumulative actuarial
gains or losses up to an amount equal to 10% of the higher of the liabilities or assets of the scheme (the corridor) have no
immediate impact on net income and are instead recognized through other comprehensive income. Cumulative gains or
losses greater than the corridor are amortized to net income over the average remaining future working lifetime of the
active members in the plan.
Net periodic benefit cost is recorded as a component of net income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income and includes service cost, interest cost, expected return on plan assets and any actuarial gains and losses
previously recognized as a component of other comprehensive income that have been amortized in the period. Net
periodic benefit costs are recognized as an operating expense.
See Note 16 – Retirement Benefit Plans for further discussion of our pension plans.
Common Stock
JHG’s ordinary shares, par value $1.50 per share, are classified as equity instruments. Equity shares issued by us are
recorded at the fair value of the proceeds received or the market price on the day of issue. Direct issue costs, net of tax,
are deducted from additional paid-in-capital within equity.
Treasury shares held are equity shares of JHG acquired by or issued to employee benefit trusts. Treasury shares held are
recorded at cost and are deducted from equity. No gain or loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income on the purchase, issue, sale or cancellation of our own equity shares.
Share Redenomination and Consolidation
On April 26, 2017, Henderson redenominated its ordinary shares from GBP to USD, resulting in a change in par value
from £0.125 to $0.1547 per share. At that time, Henderson had 1,131,842,110 shares in issue and as a result, the ordinary
share nominal capital became $175.1 million. The difference between the revised ordinary share nominal capital balance
of $175.1 million and the previously stated ordinary share nominal capital balance of $234.4 million (converted at the
historic exchange rate rather than the rate required for the redenomination under Jersey company law) was recognized as
a component of additional paid-in-capital. Consequently, the additional paid-in-capital balance was adjusted from
$1,237.9 million to $1,297.2 million.
Additionally, in accordance with a special resolution passed by the shareholders on May 3, 2017, the par value of the
shares of Henderson was reduced to $0.15 per share, from $0.1547 per share, and the total ordinary share nominal capital
became $169.8 million. In accordance with that resolution, the reduction in the total ordinary share nominal capital of
$5.3 million was credited to the additional paid-in-capital account, which moved from $1,297.2 million to $1,302.5
million.
74
75
Table of Contents Table of Contents
On April 26, 2017, the shareholders approved a 10-to-1 share consolidation, which took effect on May 30, 2017. As a
result of the share consolidation, the number of shares in issue was reduced by a factor of 10, and the par value of the
shares became $1.50.
Note 3 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
Leases
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new standard on accounting for leases.
The new standard represents a significant change to lease accounting and introduces a lessee model that brings leases
onto the balance sheet. The standard also aligns certain underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in the
FASB’s new revenue recognition standard. Furthermore, the new standard addresses other concerns related to the prior
leases model. The standard became effective January 1, 2019.
We adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Comparative prior
periods were not adjusted upon adoption as we utilized the practical expedients available under the guidance.
Specifically, we did not (i) reassess existing contracts for embedded leases, (ii) reassess existing lease agreements for
finance or operating classification, or (iii) reassess existing lease agreements in consideration of initial direct costs.
Upon adoption, we recognized $129.8 million in ROU assets related to its leased property and equipment.
Corresponding lease liabilities of $146.4 million were also recognized. Our property leases represent the vast majority of
our ROU assets and lease liabilities, with office spaces in Denver and London representing a significant portion of our
leased property.
Refer to further disclosure in Note 8 – Leases.
Hedge Accounting
In August 2017, the FASB issued an updated standard that amended hedge accounting. The standard expanded the
strategies eligible for hedge accounting, changed how companies assess hedge effectiveness and required new
disclosures and presentation. We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material
impact on our results of operations or financial position.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Retirement Benefit Plans
In August 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standards update (“ASU”) that modifies the disclosure requirements for
employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans. The ASU removes, adds and clarifies a number of disclosure
requirements related to sponsored benefit plans. The standard is effective January 1, 2021, for calendar year-end
companies, and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting standard.
Implementation Costs — Cloud Computing Arrangements
In August 2018, the FASB issued an ASU that aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in
a hosting arrangement with the requirements for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use
software. The ASU is effective January 1, 2020, for calendar year-end companies and for the interim periods within
those years. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU allows either a retrospective or prospective approach to all
implementation costs incurred after adoption. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting standard and
anticipate adopting the standard on a prospective basis. We generally expect increased capitalized costs as our previous
policy dictated that implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement be expensed as incurred.
76
Table of Contents
shares became $1.50.
Note 3 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
Leases
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new standard on accounting for leases.
The new standard represents a significant change to lease accounting and introduces a lessee model that brings leases
onto the balance sheet. The standard also aligns certain underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in the
FASB’s new revenue recognition standard. Furthermore, the new standard addresses other concerns related to the prior
leases model. The standard became effective January 1, 2019.
We adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. Comparative prior
periods were not adjusted upon adoption as we utilized the practical expedients available under the guidance.
Specifically, we did not (i) reassess existing contracts for embedded leases, (ii) reassess existing lease agreements for
finance or operating classification, or (iii) reassess existing lease agreements in consideration of initial direct costs.
Upon adoption, we recognized $129.8 million in ROU assets related to its leased property and equipment.
Corresponding lease liabilities of $146.4 million were also recognized. Our property leases represent the vast majority of
our ROU assets and lease liabilities, with office spaces in Denver and London representing a significant portion of our
leased property.
Hedge Accounting
Refer to further disclosure in Note 8 – Leases.
impact on our results of operations or financial position.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Retirement Benefit Plans
In August 2017, the FASB issued an updated standard that amended hedge accounting. The standard expanded the
strategies eligible for hedge accounting, changed how companies assess hedge effectiveness and required new
disclosures and presentation. We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a material
In August 2018, the FASB issued an accounting standards update (“ASU”) that modifies the disclosure requirements for
employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans. The ASU removes, adds and clarifies a number of disclosure
requirements related to sponsored benefit plans. The standard is effective January 1, 2021, for calendar year-end
companies, and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting standard.
Implementation Costs — Cloud Computing Arrangements
In August 2018, the FASB issued an ASU that aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in
a hosting arrangement with the requirements for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use
software. The ASU is effective January 1, 2020, for calendar year-end companies and for the interim periods within
those years. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU allows either a retrospective or prospective approach to all
implementation costs incurred after adoption. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting standard and
anticipate adopting the standard on a prospective basis. We generally expect increased capitalized costs as our previous
policy dictated that implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement be expensed as incurred.
On April 26, 2017, the shareholders approved a 10-to-1 share consolidation, which took effect on May 30, 2017. As a
result of the share consolidation, the number of shares in issue was reduced by a factor of 10, and the par value of the
Note 4 — Acquisitions and Dispositions
Merger with JCG
On May 30, 2017 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of October 3, 2016 (the
“Merger Agreement”), by and among JCG, a Delaware corporation, Henderson, a company incorporated in Jersey, and
Horizon Orbit Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct and wholly owned subsidiary of Henderson (“Merger Sub”),
Merger Sub merged with and into JCG, with JCG surviving such merger as a direct and wholly owned subsidiary of
Henderson. Upon closing of the Merger, Henderson became the parent holding company for the combined group and
was renamed Janus Henderson Group plc.
The fair value of consideration transferred to JCG common stockholders was $2,630.2 million, representing 87.2 million
shares of JHG transferred at a share price of $30.75 each as of the Closing Date, adjusted for a post-combination
stock-based compensation charge for unvested shares in relation to JCG share plans.
Pro Forma Results of Operations
The following table presents summarized unaudited supplemental pro forma operating results as if the Merger had
occurred at the beginning of January 1, 2016 (in millions):
Revenue
Net income attributable to JHG
JCG Results of Operations
Year ended December 31,
$
$
2017
2,182.6
704.6
Revenue (inclusive of revenue from certain mandates transferred to JCG from Henderson after the Merger) and net
income of JCG from the Closing Date through the end of December 31, 2017, included in JHG’s Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income are presented in the following table (in millions):
Revenue
Net income attributable to JCG
Sale of Geneva
Closing Date —
December 31, 2017
752.9
$
354.0
$
In the fourth quarter 2019, we entered into an agreement to sell our Milwaukee-based U.S. equities subsidiary Geneva.
The sale has not yet closed as of February 26, 2020.
Contingent Consideration
Acquisitions prior to the Merger included contingent consideration. Refer to Note 10 – Fair Value Measurements for a
detailed discussion of the terms of the contingent consideration.
Note 5 — Consolidation
Variable Interest Entities
Consolidated Variable Interest Entities
Our consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, include certain consolidated seeded investment products in
which we have an investment and act as the investment manager. The assets of these VIEs are not available to us or our
76
77
Table of Contents Table of Contents
creditors. We may not, under any circumstances, access cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated VIEs to use in
our operating activities or otherwise. In addition, the investors in these VIEs have no recourse to the credit of JHG.
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of investment securities included on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets pertaining to unconsolidated VIEs was $9.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively. Our total exposure to
unconsolidated VIEs represents the value of its economic ownership interest in the investment securities.
Voting Rights Entities
Consolidated Voting Rights Entities
The following table presents the balances related to consolidated VREs that were recorded on JHG’s Consolidated
Balance Sheets, including our net interest in these products (in millions):
Investment securities
Cash and cash equivalents
Other current assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Total
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated VREs
JHG's net interest in consolidated VREs
December 31, December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
29.9 $
1.5
0.2
(0.7)
30.9
(6.3)
24.6 $
13.9
1.4
0.1
(0.1)
15.3
(6.0)
9.3
Our total exposure to consolidated VREs represents the value of our economic ownership interest in these seeded
investment products.
Unconsolidated Voting Rights Entities
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of investment securities included on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets pertaining to unconsolidated VREs were $21.5 million and $50.7 million, respectively. Our total exposure to
unconsolidated VREs represents the value of our economic ownership interest in the investment securities.
Note 6 — Investment Securities
Our investment securities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are summarized as follows (in millions):
Seeded investment products:
Consolidated VIEs
Consolidated VREs
Unconsolidated VIEs and VREs
Separate accounts
Pooled investment funds
Total seeded investment products
Investments related to deferred compensation plans
Other investments
Total investment securities
December 31, December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
924.8 $
29.9
31.4
60.8
0.1
1,047.0
125.9
5.4
1,178.3 $
282.7
13.9
53.8
71.6
25.5
447.5
120.3
6.7
574.5
78
Table of Contents
creditors. We may not, under any circumstances, access cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated VIEs to use in
our operating activities or otherwise. In addition, the investors in these VIEs have no recourse to the credit of JHG.
Trading Securities
Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities held by us as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, are
summarized as follows (in millions):
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities held at period end
$
Derivative Instruments
Year ended
December 31,
2018
(40.6) $
2019
(19.2) $
2017
25.2
We maintain an economic hedge program that uses derivative instruments to mitigate against market volatility of certain
seeded investments by using index and commodity futures (“futures”), index swaps, total return swaps (“TRSs”) and
credit default swaps. Foreign currency exposures associated with our seeded investment products are also hedged by
using foreign currency forward contracts. We also have a net investment hedge related to foreign currency translation on
hedged seed investments denominated in currencies other than our functional currency.
We were a party to the following derivative instruments as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Futures
Credit default swaps
Total return swaps
Foreign currency forward contracts
Notional Value
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
147.1
$
133.2
77.2
131.8
222.9 $
143.0
46.3
327.8
The derivative instruments are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, with the exception of certain foreign
currency forward contracts used for net investment hedging. Changes in fair value of the futures, index swaps, TRSs and
credit default swaps are recognized in investment gains (losses), net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. Changes in the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges for accounting
purposes are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax on our Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income.
Derivative assets and liabilities are generally recognized on a gross basis and included in other current assets or accounts
payable and accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019 derivative assets and
liabilities were $0.7 million and $8.7 million, respectively.
We recognized the following foreign currency translation gains (losses) on hedged seed investments denominated in
currencies other than our functional currency and gains (losses) associated with foreign currency forward contracts under
net investment hedge accounting for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of investment securities included on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets pertaining to unconsolidated VIEs was $9.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively. Our total exposure to
unconsolidated VIEs represents the value of its economic ownership interest in the investment securities.
Voting Rights Entities
Consolidated Voting Rights Entities
The following table presents the balances related to consolidated VREs that were recorded on JHG’s Consolidated
Balance Sheets, including our net interest in these products (in millions):
December 31, December 31,
2019
2018
$
29.9 $
1.5
0.2
(0.7)
30.9
(6.3)
13.9
1.4
0.1
(0.1)
15.3
(6.0)
9.3
Investment securities
Cash and cash equivalents
Other current assets
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Total
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated VREs
JHG's net interest in consolidated VREs
$
24.6 $
Our total exposure to consolidated VREs represents the value of our economic ownership interest in these seeded
investment products.
Unconsolidated Voting Rights Entities
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying value of investment securities included on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets pertaining to unconsolidated VREs were $21.5 million and $50.7 million, respectively. Our total exposure to
unconsolidated VREs represents the value of our economic ownership interest in the investment securities.
Note 6 — Investment Securities
Our investment securities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are summarized as follows (in millions):
Seeded investment products:
Consolidated VIEs
Consolidated VREs
Unconsolidated VIEs and VREs
Separate accounts
Pooled investment funds
Total seeded investment products
Investments related to deferred compensation plans
Other investments
Total investment securities
December 31, December 31,
2019
2018
$
924.8 $
282.7
29.9
31.4
60.8
0.1
1,047.0
125.9
5.4
13.9
53.8
71.6
25.5
447.5
120.3
6.7
$
1,178.3 $
574.5
Foreign currency translation
Foreign currency forward contracts
Total
$
$
Year ended December 31,
2018
(6.8) $
6.8
— $
In addition to using derivative instruments to mitigate against market volatility of certain seeded investments, we also
occasionally engage in short sales of securities. As of December 31, 2019, the fair value of securities sold but not yet
purchased was $26.5 million. The cash received from the short sale and the obligation to repurchase the shares are
classified in other current assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets,
respectively. Fair value adjustments are recognized in investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income.
78
79
2019
(1.1) $
1.1
— $
2017
(3.2)
3.2
—
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Derivative Instruments in Consolidated Seeded Investment Products
Certain of our consolidated seeded investment products utilize derivative instruments to contribute to the achievement of
defined investment objectives. These derivative instruments are classified within other current assets or accounts payable
and accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Gains and losses on these derivative instruments are
classified within investment gains (losses), net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Our consolidated seeded investment products were party to the following derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Futures
Contracts for differences
Credit default swaps
Total return swaps
Interest rate swaps
Options
Swaptions
Foreign currency forward contracts
Notional Value
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
267.8
88.3 $
$
8.7
15.5
6.2
0.1
23.7
0.1
61.5
19.4
9.6
1.0
8.3
—
154.9
167.5
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, certain consolidated seeded investment products sold credit protection through the
use of credit default swap contracts. The contracts provide alternative credit risk exposure to individual companies and
countries outside of traditional bond markets. The terms of the credit default swap contracts range from one to five years.
As sellers in credit default swap contracts, the consolidated seeded investment products would be required to pay the
notional value of a referenced debt obligation to the counterparty in the event of a default on the debt obligation by the
issuer. The notional value represents the estimated maximum potential undiscounted amount of future payments required
upon the occurrence of a credit default event. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the notional values of the agreements
totaled $2.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively. The credit default swap contracts include recourse provisions that
allow for recovery of a certain percentage of amounts paid upon the occurrence of a credit default event. As of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the credit default swap contracts selling protection was nil and $0.1
million, respectively.
Investment Gains (Losses), Net
Investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income included the following for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Year ended December 31,
2018
2019
20.7 $ (42.6) $
2017
—
13.5
34.2 $ (40.9) $
—
1.7
4.0
10.2
3.8
18.0
Seeded investment products and derivatives, net
Gain on sale of Volantis
Other
Investment gains (losses), net
$
$
80
Table of Contents
2017
Sales,
settlements
and
Purchases settlements Purchases settlements Purchases
and
and
and
and
and
2019
Sales,
Year ended December 31,
2018
Sales,
Derivative Instruments in Consolidated Seeded Investment Products
Cash Flows
Cash flows related to our investment securities for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, are summarized
as follows (in millions):
Certain of our consolidated seeded investment products utilize derivative instruments to contribute to the achievement of
defined investment objectives. These derivative instruments are classified within other current assets or accounts payable
and accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Gains and losses on these derivative instruments are
classified within investment gains (losses), net in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
Our consolidated seeded investment products were party to the following derivative instruments as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Futures
Contracts for differences
Credit default swaps
Total return swaps
Interest rate swaps
Options
Swaptions
Foreign currency forward contracts
Notional Value
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
$
88.3 $
267.8
15.5
0.1
0.1
19.4
1.0
—
167.5
8.7
6.2
23.7
61.5
9.6
8.3
154.9
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, certain consolidated seeded investment products sold credit protection through the
use of credit default swap contracts. The contracts provide alternative credit risk exposure to individual companies and
countries outside of traditional bond markets. The terms of the credit default swap contracts range from one to five years.
As sellers in credit default swap contracts, the consolidated seeded investment products would be required to pay the
notional value of a referenced debt obligation to the counterparty in the event of a default on the debt obligation by the
issuer. The notional value represents the estimated maximum potential undiscounted amount of future payments required
upon the occurrence of a credit default event. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the notional values of the agreements
totaled $2.2 million and $3.9 million, respectively. The credit default swap contracts include recourse provisions that
allow for recovery of a certain percentage of amounts paid upon the occurrence of a credit default event. As of
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the credit default swap contracts selling protection was nil and $0.1
million, respectively.
Investment Gains (Losses), Net
Investment gains (losses), net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income included the following for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Seeded investment products and derivatives, net
$
20.7 $ (42.6) $
Gain on sale of Volantis
Other
Investment gains (losses), net
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
—
13.5
—
1.7
4.0
10.2
3.8
$
34.2 $ (40.9) $
18.0
Investment securities
settlements maturities
$ (903.4) $ 582.6 $ (626.3) $ 697.1 $ (827.5) $
settlements maturities settlements maturities
976.4
Note 7 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following tables present movements in our intangible assets and goodwill during the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
December 31,
2018
Amortization Impairment translation Disposal
Foreign
currency
December 31,
2019
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Investment management agreements
Trademarks
Definite-lived intangible assets:
Client relationships
Accumulated amortization
Net intangible assets
Goodwill
$ 2,495.5 $
380.8
—
363.3
(116.3)
$ 3,123.3 $
$ 1,478.0 $
— $
—
(18.0) $
—
12.8 $
—
— $ 2,490.3
380.8
—
—
(29.3)
(29.3) $
— $
—
—
(18.0) $
— $
1.4
(1.6)
12.6 $
26.3 $
364.7
—
—
(147.2)
— $ 3,088.6
— $ 1,504.3
December 31,
2017
Foreign
currency
Amortization Impairment translation
Disposal
December 31,
2018
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Investment management agreements
Trademarks
$
2,543.9 $
381.2
— $
—
(7.2) $
—
(41.2) $
(0.4)
— $
—
2,495.5
380.8
Definite-lived intangible assets:
Client relationships
Accumulated amortization
Net intangible assets
Goodwill
369.4
(89.7)
3,204.8 $
1,533.9 $
$
$
—
(29.5)
(29.5) $
— $
—
—
(7.2) $
— $
(6.1)
2.9
(44.8) $
(46.4) $
—
—
— $
(9.5) $
363.3
(116.3)
3,123.3
1,478.0
Indefinite-lived intangible assets represent certain investment management contracts where we expect both the renewal
of the contracts and the cash flows generated by them to continue indefinitely. Trademarks primarily relate to JCG and
were acquired as a result of the Merger. Definite-lived intangible assets represent client relationships, which are
amortized over their estimated lives using the straight-line method. The initial estimated weighted-average life of the
client relationships is approximately 13 years.
Foreign currency translation movements in the table primarily relate to the translation of the intangible assets and
goodwill balances denominated in non-USD currencies to our functional and presentational currency of USD using the
closing foreign currency exchange rate at the end of each reporting period.
Transaction with BNP Paribas
On March 31, 2018, we completed a transaction transferring JHG’s back-office (including fund administration and fund
accounting); middle-office (including portfolio accounting, securities operations and trading operations); and custody
functions in the U.S. to BNP Paribas. As part of the transaction, more than 100 of our employees, based in Denver,
80
81
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Colorado, transitioned to BNP Paribas, and BNP Paribas became the fund services provider for our U.S.-regulated
mutual funds. Gross consideration of $40.0 million was received for the transaction, which resulted in the recognition of
a $22.3 million gain in other non-operating income (expenses), net on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. We also allocated $9.5 million of goodwill to the transaction, which resulted in a $9.5 million goodwill
reduction, disclosed in the disposal column in the table above.
Future Amortization
Expected future amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets is summarized below (in millions):
Future amortization
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Impairment Testing
Amount
29.4
$
26.5
18.0
17.8
16.4
109.4
217.5
$
We perform our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on October 1 of each
year. For our 2019 assessment, we elected to perform step one of the goodwill impairment assessment comparing the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. We opted to use a market value approach with a control
premium to estimate the enterprise value of our sole reporting unit. The results of the assessment revealed the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit was $0.3 billion greater than the carrying value.
Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets comprised of investment management agreements were tested for impairment
in the second quarter 2019 due to lower than expected growth. A discounted cash flow model was used to determine the
estimated fair value. Some of the inputs used in the discounted cash flow model required significant management
judgment; this includes the discount rate, terminal growth rate and forecasted financial results. The results of the
valuation indicated an estimated value of $132.0 million which was $18.0 million below the $150.0 million carrying
value of intangible asset. As such, we recorded an $18.0 million impairment in depreciation and amortization expense in
the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The carrying value of the intangible asset as of December 31,
2019 (post-impairment) was $132.0 million.
We also assessed our indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of our annual impairment assessment. We used a
qualitative approach to determine the likelihood of impairment, with AUM being the focus of the assessment. After
reviewing the results of the qualitative assessment, certain intangible assets comprised of investment management
agreements with a carrying value of $167.6 million as of September 30, 2019 required further review to determine if
they were impaired. We prepared a discounted cash flow model to arrive at the estimated fair value of the intangible
asset, which was above the carrying value of the asset. As discussed above, some of the inputs in the discounted cash
flow model require significant management judgment. For the remaining indefinite-lived intangible assets, we concluded
it is more likely than not that the fair values of our intangible assets exceed their carrying values; no impairment was
recorded.
Our definite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. There were no definite-lived intangible asset impairments identified during
the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we identified and recorded a $7.2 million
impairment associated with our Gartmore investment management agreements, which was recognized within
depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
82
Table of Contents
Future Amortization
Future amortization
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Impairment Testing
Amount
$
29.4
26.5
18.0
17.8
16.4
109.4
217.5
$
We perform our annual impairment assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on October 1 of each
year. For our 2019 assessment, we elected to perform step one of the goodwill impairment assessment comparing the
estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. We opted to use a market value approach with a control
premium to estimate the enterprise value of our sole reporting unit. The results of the assessment revealed the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit was $0.3 billion greater than the carrying value.
Certain indefinite-lived intangible assets comprised of investment management agreements were tested for impairment
in the second quarter 2019 due to lower than expected growth. A discounted cash flow model was used to determine the
estimated fair value. Some of the inputs used in the discounted cash flow model required significant management
judgment; this includes the discount rate, terminal growth rate and forecasted financial results. The results of the
valuation indicated an estimated value of $132.0 million which was $18.0 million below the $150.0 million carrying
value of intangible asset. As such, we recorded an $18.0 million impairment in depreciation and amortization expense in
the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The carrying value of the intangible asset as of December 31,
2019 (post-impairment) was $132.0 million.
We also assessed our indefinite-lived intangible assets as part of our annual impairment assessment. We used a
qualitative approach to determine the likelihood of impairment, with AUM being the focus of the assessment. After
reviewing the results of the qualitative assessment, certain intangible assets comprised of investment management
agreements with a carrying value of $167.6 million as of September 30, 2019 required further review to determine if
they were impaired. We prepared a discounted cash flow model to arrive at the estimated fair value of the intangible
asset, which was above the carrying value of the asset. As discussed above, some of the inputs in the discounted cash
flow model require significant management judgment. For the remaining indefinite-lived intangible assets, we concluded
it is more likely than not that the fair values of our intangible assets exceed their carrying values; no impairment was
recorded.
Our definite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may not be recoverable. There were no definite-lived intangible asset impairments identified during
the year ended December 31, 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we identified and recorded a $7.2 million
impairment associated with our Gartmore investment management agreements, which was recognized within
depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Colorado, transitioned to BNP Paribas, and BNP Paribas became the fund services provider for our U.S.-regulated
mutual funds. Gross consideration of $40.0 million was received for the transaction, which resulted in the recognition of
a $22.3 million gain in other non-operating income (expenses), net on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income. We also allocated $9.5 million of goodwill to the transaction, which resulted in a $9.5 million goodwill
reduction, disclosed in the disposal column in the table above.
Expected future amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets is summarized below (in millions):
Note 8 — Leases
Our leases include operating and finance leases for property and equipment. Property leases include office space in the
UK, Europe, the U.S. and the Asia-Pacific region. Equipment leases include copiers and server equipment located
throughout our office space. Our leases have remaining lease terms of one year to 10 years. Certain leases include
options to extend or early terminate the leases, however, we currently do not intend to exercise these options, and they
are not reflected in our lease assets and liabilities. The impact of operating and financing leases on our financial
statements is summarized below.
Balance Sheet
Operating and financing lease assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,
consisted of the following (in millions):
Operating lease right-of-use assets:
Other non-current assets
Operating lease liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Total operating lease liabilities
Finance lease right-of-use assets:
Property and equipment, cost
Accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net
Finance lease liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Total finance lease liabilities
Statement of Comprehensive Income
December 31, 2019
132.6
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
24.9
129.4
154.3
13.0
(12.2)
0.8
0.8
0.1
0.9
The components of lease expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the year ended
December 31, 2019, are summarized below (in millions):
Operating lease cost(1)
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use asset(2)
Interest on lease liabilities(3)
Total finance lease cost
Year ended
December 31, 2019
$
$
$
33.7
1.1
—
1.1
(1) Included in general, administrative and occupancy on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
(2) Included in depreciation and amortization on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
(3) Included in interest expense on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
We sublease certain office buildings in the UK and received $7.3 million from the tenants during the year ended
December 31, 2019. We recognized a $4.7 million impairment of a subleased ROU operating asset in the UK during the
year ended December 31, 2019, as collection of rents under the sublease are uncertain. Also, we recognized a $0.7
82
83
Table of Contents Table of Contents
million impairment of a U.S. operating lease during the year ended December 31, 2019, due to early termination of the
lease.
Cash Flow Statement
Cash payments for operating and finance leases included in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2019, consisted of the following (in millions):
Operating cash flows from operating leases
Financing cash flows from finance leases
Year ended
December 31, 2019
28.9
$
1.1
$
Non-cash lease transactions during the year ended December 31, 2019, included a $19.8 million ROU asset and
corresponding lease liability for a UK property lease commenced in March 2019.
Supplemental Information
As of December 31, 2019, we have an additional operating lease for office space in the U.S. that has not yet commenced.
The lease commenced in January 2020, with a lease term of 11 years. The future rent obligations associated with the
lease are $8.4 million.
The weighted-average remaining lease term, weighted-average discount rate and future lease obligations are summarized
below.
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in months):
Operating leases
Finance leases
Weighted-average discount rate(1):
Operating leases
Finance leases
December 31, 2019
80
15
December 31, 2019
4.6%
2.8%
(1) Discounted using incremental borrowing rates determined for each lease as of the date of adoption, including
consideration for specific interest rate environments.
Future lease obligations (in millions)
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total lease payments
Less interest
Total
Note 9 — Equity Method Investments
Operating leases
31.1
$
29.8
25.5
23.6
22.4
48.8
181.2
26.9
154.3 $
Finance leases
0.7
$
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
0.9
—
0.9
$
Equity method investments of $8.8 million and $7.8 million were recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets within
other non-current assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
84
Table of Contents
lease.
Cash Flow Statement
Operating cash flows from operating leases
Financing cash flows from finance leases
Non-cash lease transactions during the year ended December 31, 2019, included a $19.8 million ROU asset and
corresponding lease liability for a UK property lease commenced in March 2019.
Year ended
December 31, 2019
$
$
28.9
1.1
As of December 31, 2019, we have an additional operating lease for office space in the U.S. that has not yet commenced.
The lease commenced in January 2020, with a lease term of 11 years. The future rent obligations associated with the
The weighted-average remaining lease term, weighted-average discount rate and future lease obligations are summarized
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in months):
December 31, 2019
Supplemental Information
lease are $8.4 million.
below.
Operating leases
Finance leases
Weighted-average discount rate(1):
Operating leases
Finance leases
(1) Discounted using incremental borrowing rates determined for each lease as of the date of adoption, including
consideration for specific interest rate environments.
December 31, 2019
80
15
4.6%
2.8%
0.7
0.1
0.1
—
—
—
0.9
—
0.9
Operating leases
Finance leases
$
$
31.1
29.8
25.5
23.6
22.4
48.8
181.2
26.9
$
154.3 $
Future lease obligations (in millions)
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total lease payments
Less interest
Total
Note 9 — Equity Method Investments
Equity method investments of $8.8 million and $7.8 million were recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheets within
other non-current assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
million impairment of a U.S. operating lease during the year ended December 31, 2019, due to early termination of the
We hold interests in the following equity method investments, including joint ventures managed through shareholder
agreements with third-party investors, accounted for under the equity method:
Country of
Cash payments for operating and finance leases included in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2019, consisted of the following (in millions):
Long Tail Alpha
incorporation
and principal
place of operation
USA
2019
Functional percentage
currency
USD
owned
20 %
2018
percentage
owned
20 %
The share of net gain (loss) from equity method investments recognized within investment gains (losses), net on our
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income was $1.5 million gain and $2.0 million gain during the years ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Note 10 — Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements or disclosed in the notes to our
consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets Significant other
and liabilities
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
observable inputs unobservable inputs
Significant
(Level 3)
Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents
Investment securities:
Consolidated VIEs
Other investment securities
Total investment securities
Seed hedge derivatives
Volantis contingent consideration
Total assets
Liabilities:
Derivatives in consolidated seeded investment
products
Securities sold, not yet purchased
Seed hedge derivatives
Long-term debt (1)
Deferred bonuses
Contingent consideration
Total liabilities
$
198.4 $
— $
— $ 198.4
573.9
197.0
770.9
—
—
969.3 $
— $
26.5
—
—
—
—
26.5 $
341.0
56.5
397.5
0.7
—
398.2 $
0.9 $
—
8.7
330.0
—
—
339.6 $
$
$
$
924.8
9.9
253.5
—
1,178.3
9.9
0.7
—
2.9
2.9
12.8 $ 1,380.3
0.9
— $
26.5
—
8.7
—
330.0
—
76.6
76.6
21.2
21.2
97.8 $ 463.9
(1) Carried at amortized cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and disclosed at fair value.
84
85
Table of Contents Table of Contents
The following table presents assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements or disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 (in millions):
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
Assets:
Cash equivalents
Investment securities:
Consolidated VIEs
Other investment securities
Total investment securities
Seed hedge derivatives
Derivatives in consolidated seeded investment
products
Contingent consideration
Total assets
Liabilities:
Derivatives in consolidated seeded investment
products
Financial liabilities in consolidated seeded
investment products
Seed hedge derivatives
Long-term debt(1)
Deferred bonuses
Contingent consideration
Total liabilities
$
identical assets Significant other
and liabilities
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
observable inputs unobservable inputs
Significant
(Level 3)
Total
$
381.8 $
— $
— $ 381.8
103.8
194.5
298.3
—
159.7
97.3
257.0
3.2
—
—
680.1 $
0.9
—
261.1 $
$
19.2
—
19.2
—
282.7
291.8
574.5
3.2
0.9
—
3.9
3.9
23.1 $ 964.3
$
— $
2.1 $
— $
2.1
0.4
—
—
—
—
0.4 $
—
1.1
301.4
—
—
304.6 $
0.4
—
1.1
—
301.4
—
68.5
68.5
61.3
61.3
129.8 $ 434.8
(1) Carried at amortized cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and disclosed at fair value.
Level 1 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 1 fair value measurements consist mostly of seeded investment products, investments in advised mutual
funds, cash equivalents and investments related to deferred compensation plans with quoted market prices in active
markets. The fair value level of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying securities of
the product. The fair value level of unconsolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying inputs
used in the calculation of the NAV and the trading activity of each product.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 2 fair value measurements consist mostly of consolidated seeded investment products, derivative instruments
and our long-term debt. The fair value of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying
securities of the product. The fair value of our long-term debt is determined using broker quotes and recent trading
activity, which are considered Level 2 inputs.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Investment Products
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, certain securities within consolidated VIEs were valued using significant
unobservable inputs, resulting in Level 3 classification.
86
Table of Contents
The following table presents assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements or disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 (in millions):
Valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of our material Level 3 assets included
within consolidated VIEs as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, were as follows (in millions):
Assets:
Cash equivalents
Investment securities:
Consolidated VIEs
Other investment securities
Total investment securities
Seed hedge derivatives
products
Contingent consideration
Derivatives in consolidated seeded investment
Total assets
Liabilities:
products
Derivatives in consolidated seeded investment
Financial liabilities in consolidated seeded
investment products
Seed hedge derivatives
Long-term debt(1)
Deferred bonuses
Contingent consideration
Total liabilities
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets Significant other
Significant
and liabilities
observable inputs unobservable inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Total
$
381.8 $
— $
— $ 381.8
$
680.1 $
261.1 $
23.1 $ 964.3
$
— $
2.1 $
— $
2.1
103.8
194.5
298.3
—
—
—
0.4
—
—
—
—
159.7
97.3
257.0
3.2
0.9
—
—
1.1
301.4
—
—
19.2
—
282.7
291.8
19.2
574.5
—
3.2
—
3.9
0.9
3.9
—
—
—
68.5
61.3
0.4
1.1
301.4
68.5
61.3
$
0.4 $
304.6 $
129.8 $ 434.8
(1) Carried at amortized cost on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and disclosed at fair value.
Level 1 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 1 fair value measurements consist mostly of seeded investment products, investments in advised mutual
funds, cash equivalents and investments related to deferred compensation plans with quoted market prices in active
markets. The fair value level of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying securities of
the product. The fair value level of unconsolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying inputs
used in the calculation of the NAV and the trading activity of each product.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements
Our Level 2 fair value measurements consist mostly of consolidated seeded investment products, derivative instruments
and our long-term debt. The fair value of consolidated seeded investment products is determined by the underlying
securities of the product. The fair value of our long-term debt is determined using broker quotes and recent trading
activity, which are considered Level 2 inputs.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Investment Products
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, certain securities within consolidated VIEs were valued using significant
unobservable inputs, resulting in Level 3 classification.
As of December 31, 2019
Investment securities of consolidated VIEs
As of December 31, 2018
Investment securities of consolidated VIEs
Contingent Consideration
Fair
value
Significant
unobservable
inputs
9.9 Discounted Discount rate
Valuation
technique
$
cash flow EBITDA multiple
Price-earnings ratio
Significant
unobservable
inputs
$ 19.2 Discounted Discount rate
Valuation
technique
Fair
value
cash flow EBITDA multiple
Price-earnings ratio
Inputs
15%
5.92
11.09
Range
(weighted-average)
15%
18.5
28.4
The maximum amount payable and fair value of Geneva and Kapstream contingent consideration is summarized below
(in millions):
Maximum amount payable
Fair value included in:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Total fair value
Fair value included in:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Other non-current liabilities
Total fair value
Acquisition of Geneva
As of December 31, 2019
Geneva
Kapstream
$
52.2 $
14.4
$
$
$
$
— $
6.9
6.9 $
14.3
—
14.3
As of December 31, 2018
Geneva
Kapstream
— $
25.3
25.3 $
13.8
12.3
26.1
The consideration payable on the acquisition of Geneva in 2014 included two contingent tranches payable over six years.
The fair value of the contingent consideration is estimated at each reporting date by forecasting revenue, as defined by
the sale and purchase agreement, over the contingency period and by determining whether targets will be met.
Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation are limited to forecasted revenues, which factor in expected growth
in AUM based on performance and industry trends. A fair value adjustment due to a revised forecast resulted in a $20.0
million decrease to the liability during the year ended December 31, 2019. The adjustment was recorded in other non-
operating income, net on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. The remaining change in the liability
is due to the unwind of the discount.
In the fourth quarter 2019, we entered into an agreement to sell our Milwaukee-based U.S. equities subsidiary Geneva.
The sale has not yet closed as of February 26, 2020.
86
87
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Acquisition of Kapstream
The purchase of Kapstream was a step acquisition and the purchase of the second step (49%) had contingent
consideration of up to $43.0 million. Payment of the contingent consideration is subject to all Kapstream products and
certain products advised by us, reaching defined revenue targets on the first, second and third anniversaries of January
31, 2017. The contingent consideration is payable in three equal installments on the anniversary dates and is indexed to
the performance of the premier share class of the Kapstream Absolute Return Income Fund. If Kapstream achieves the
defined revenue targets, the holders receive the value of the contingent consideration adjusted for gains or losses
attributable to the mutual fund to which the contingent consideration is indexed, subject to tax withholding. On January
31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, the first, second, and third anniversary of the acquisition, Kapstream reached defined revenue
targets, and we paid $15.3 million in February 2018, $14.1 million in February 2019 and $13.8 million in February 2020.
The February 2020 payment represented the final payment.
The fair value of the Kapstream contingent consideration is calculated at each reporting date by forecasting certain
Kapstream AUM or defined revenue over the contingency period and determining whether the forecasted amounts meet
the defined targets. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation are limited to forecasted Kapstream AUM and
performance against defined revenue targets. No fair value adjustment was necessary during the year ended
December 31, 2019.
Acquisition of Perennial
The acquisition of Perennial Fixed Interest Partners Ltd and Perennial Growth Management Pty Ltd (together
“Perennial”) included the earn-out payable in 2019. The earn-out had employee service conditions, was based on net
management fee revenue and was accrued over the service period as compensation expense. The earn-out criteria were
achieved in September 2019 and the Group paid $12.1 million in October 2019.
Disposal of Volantis
On April 1, 2017, we completed the sale of Volantis alternative team assets. Consideration for the sale was a 10% share
of the management and performance fees generated by Volantis for a period of three years.
The fair value of the Volantis contingent consideration is estimated at each reporting date by forecasting revenues over
the contingency period of three years. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation are limited to forecasted
revenues, which factor in expected growth in AUM based on performance and industry trends. Increases in forecasted
revenue increase the fair value of the consideration, while decreases in forecasted revenue decrease the fair value. The
forecasted share of revenues is then discounted back to the valuation date using a discount rate.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the Volantis contingent consideration was $2.9 million and $3.9
million, respectively.
Deferred Bonuses
Deferred bonuses represent liabilities to employees over the vesting period that will be settled by investments in our
products. The significant unobservable inputs used to value the liabilities are investment designations and vesting
periods.
88
Table of Contents
The purchase of Kapstream was a step acquisition and the purchase of the second step (49%) had contingent
consideration of up to $43.0 million. Payment of the contingent consideration is subject to all Kapstream products and
certain products advised by us, reaching defined revenue targets on the first, second and third anniversaries of January
31, 2017. The contingent consideration is payable in three equal installments on the anniversary dates and is indexed to
the performance of the premier share class of the Kapstream Absolute Return Income Fund. If Kapstream achieves the
defined revenue targets, the holders receive the value of the contingent consideration adjusted for gains or losses
attributable to the mutual fund to which the contingent consideration is indexed, subject to tax withholding. On January
31, 2018, 2019 and 2020, the first, second, and third anniversary of the acquisition, Kapstream reached defined revenue
targets, and we paid $15.3 million in February 2018, $14.1 million in February 2019 and $13.8 million in February 2020.
The February 2020 payment represented the final payment.
The fair value of the Kapstream contingent consideration is calculated at each reporting date by forecasting certain
Kapstream AUM or defined revenue over the contingency period and determining whether the forecasted amounts meet
the defined targets. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation are limited to forecasted Kapstream AUM and
performance against defined revenue targets. No fair value adjustment was necessary during the year ended
The acquisition of Perennial Fixed Interest Partners Ltd and Perennial Growth Management Pty Ltd (together
“Perennial”) included the earn-out payable in 2019. The earn-out had employee service conditions, was based on net
management fee revenue and was accrued over the service period as compensation expense. The earn-out criteria were
achieved in September 2019 and the Group paid $12.1 million in October 2019.
On April 1, 2017, we completed the sale of Volantis alternative team assets. Consideration for the sale was a 10% share
of the management and performance fees generated by Volantis for a period of three years.
The fair value of the Volantis contingent consideration is estimated at each reporting date by forecasting revenues over
the contingency period of three years. Significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation are limited to forecasted
revenues, which factor in expected growth in AUM based on performance and industry trends. Increases in forecasted
revenue increase the fair value of the consideration, while decreases in forecasted revenue decrease the fair value. The
forecasted share of revenues is then discounted back to the valuation date using a discount rate.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the Volantis contingent consideration was $2.9 million and $3.9
December 31, 2019.
Acquisition of Perennial
Disposal of Volantis
million, respectively.
Deferred Bonuses
periods.
Deferred bonuses represent liabilities to employees over the vesting period that will be settled by investments in our
products. The significant unobservable inputs used to value the liabilities are investment designations and vesting
Acquisition of Kapstream
Changes in Fair Value
Changes in fair value of our Level 3 assets for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows (in
millions):
Beginning of period fair value
Disposals
Settlements
Movement recognized in net income
Movements recognized in other comprehensive income
End of period fair value
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
23.1 $
—
(2.3)
(8.2)
0.2
12.8 $
46.5
(7.6)
(5.9)
(9.5)
(0.4)
23.1
Changes in fair value of our individual Level 3 liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,were as
follows (in millions):
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
Contingent Deferred
bonuses
consideration
Contingent
consideration
Deferred
bonuses
Beginning of period fair value
Fair value adjustments
Vesting of deferred bonuses
Amortization of deferred bonuses
Unrealized gains (losses)
Distributions
Foreign currency translation
End of period fair value
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
$
$
61.3 $ 68.5 $
(20.0)
—
—
6.7
(26.6)
(0.2)
21.2 $ 76.6 $
7.5
(52.3)
49.6
—
—
3.3
76.6 $
11.2
—
—
—
(22.8)
(3.7)
61.3 $
Dai-ichi
option
26.1
(26.8)
—
—
—
—
0.7
—
64.7 $
(0.4)
(44.8)
53.7
—
—
(4.7)
68.5 $
Nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements include goodwill and intangible assets. We measure the fair value of
goodwill and intangible assets on initial recognition using discounted cash flow analysis that requires assumptions
regarding projected future earnings and discount rates. Because of the significance of the unobservable inputs in the fair
value measurements of these assets, such measurements are classified as Level 3.
Note 11 — Debt
Our debt as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, consisted of the following (in millions):
4.875% Senior Notes due 2025
4.875% Senior Notes Due 2025
December 31, 2019
Carrying Fair
value
value
December 31, 2018
Carrying Fair
value
value
$ 316.2 $ 330.0 $ 319.1 $ 301.4
The 2025 Senior Notes have a principal value of $300.0 million as of December 31, 2019, pay interest at 4.875%
semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year, and mature on August 1, 2025. The Senior Notes include
unamortized debt premium, net at December 31, 2019, of $16.2 million, which will be amortized over the remaining life
of the notes. The unamortized debt premium is recorded as a liability within long-term debt on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. We fully and unconditionally guarantee the obligations of JCG in relation to the Senior Notes.
88
89
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Credit Facility
At December 31, 2019, we had a $200 million, unsecured, revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). JHG and our
subsidiaries can use the Credit Facility for general corporate purposes. The rate of interest for each interest period is the
aggregate of the applicable margin, which is based on our long-term credit rating and the London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”); the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) in relation to any loan in euro (“EUR”); or in relation to any
loan in Australian dollar (“AUD”), the benchmark rate for that currency. We are required to pay a quarterly commitment
fee on any unused portion of the Credit Facility, which is also based on our long-term credit rating. Under the Credit
Facility, the financing leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.00x EBITDA. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with
all covenants contained in, and there were no borrowings under, the Credit Facility. The maturity date of the Credit
Facility is February 16, 2024.
Note 12 — Income Taxes
The components of our provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, are as
follows (in millions):
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
Current:
UK
U.S. including state and local
International
Total current income taxes
Deferred:
UK
U.S. including state and local
International
Total deferred income taxes (benefits)
Total income tax expense (benefit)
$
23.6 $
110.7
8.2
142.5
48.8 $
116.7
7.2
172.7
51.5
83.1
10.0
144.6
(0.4)
(2.2)
(2.1)
(4.7)
0.3
(3.1)
(354.4)
(6.6)
(1.5)
(0.8)
(355.6)
(10.5)
$ 137.8 $ 162.2 $ (211.0)
The components of our total income before taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, are as follows
(in millions):
2017
$
Year ended December 31,
2018
2019
80.1 $ 178.3 $ 229.0
190.5
27.9
$ 583.5 $ 661.8 $ 447.4
467.4
16.1
445.3
58.1
UK
U.S.
International
Total income before taxes
90
Table of Contents
Credit Facility
At December 31, 2019, we had a $200 million, unsecured, revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). JHG and our
subsidiaries can use the Credit Facility for general corporate purposes. The rate of interest for each interest period is the
aggregate of the applicable margin, which is based on our long-term credit rating and the London Interbank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”); the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) in relation to any loan in euro (“EUR”); or in relation to any
loan in Australian dollar (“AUD”), the benchmark rate for that currency. We are required to pay a quarterly commitment
fee on any unused portion of the Credit Facility, which is also based on our long-term credit rating. Under the Credit
Facility, the financing leverage ratio cannot exceed 3.00x EBITDA. At December 31, 2019, we were in compliance with
all covenants contained in, and there were no borrowings under, the Credit Facility. The maturity date of the Credit
Facility is February 16, 2024.
Note 12 — Income Taxes
follows (in millions):
The components of our provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, are as
Current:
UK
Deferred:
UK
U.S. including state and local
International
Total current income taxes
U.S. including state and local
International
Total deferred income taxes (benefits)
Total income tax expense (benefit)
UK
U.S.
International
Total income before taxes
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
23.6 $
48.8 $
110.7
116.7
8.2
7.2
51.5
83.1
10.0
142.5
172.7
144.6
(0.4)
(2.2)
(2.1)
(4.7)
(3.1)
(6.6)
(0.8)
0.3
(354.4)
(1.5)
(10.5)
(355.6)
$ 137.8 $ 162.2 $ (211.0)
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
80.1 $ 178.3 $ 229.0
445.3
467.4
190.5
58.1
16.1
27.9
$ 583.5 $ 661.8 $ 447.4
We are a tax resident in the UK and are subject to the tax laws and regulations of that country. The following is a
reconciliation between the UK statutory corporation tax rate and the effective tax rate on our income from operations.
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
UK statutory corporation tax rate
Effect of foreign tax rates
Equity-based compensation
Finalization of positions with HMRC(1)
Tax adjustments
Non-deductible costs associated with the Merger
Impact of changes in statutory tax rates on deferred taxes
Taxes applicable to prior years
Other, net
Effective income tax rate, controlling interest
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Total effective income tax rate
19.0 % 19.0 % 19.3 %
3.9
4.4
0.3
1.1
—
—
0.3
0.2
—
—
0.1
—
(1.2)
(0.5)
1.4
—
24.2 % 23.8 % (47.0) %
(0.6)
0.7
23.6 % 24.5 % (47.1) %
7.4
0.2
0.3
0.7
1.2
(77.4)
(0.4)
1.7
(0.1)
The components of our total income before taxes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, are as follows
(in millions):
The significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows
(in millions):
(1) Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”), tax authority of the UK.
We operate in several taxing jurisdictions around the world, each with its own statutory tax rate and set of tax laws and
regulations. As a result, our future blended average statutory tax rate will be influenced by any changes to such laws and
regulations and the mix of profits and losses of our subsidiaries.
Tax Legislation
Any legislative changes and new or proposed Treasury regulations may result in additional income tax impacts, which
could be material in the period any such changes are enacted.
Deferred Taxes
Deferred tax assets:
Compensation and staff benefits
Loss carryforwards(1)
Accrued liabilities
Debt premium
Lease liabilities
Other
Gross deferred tax assets
Valuation allowance
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
Deferred tax liabilities:
Retirement benefits
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets
Lease right-of-use assets
Other
Gross deferred tax liabilities
Total deferred tax (liabilities)(2)
90
91
December 31,
2019
2018
$
63.0 $
59.9
2.8
4.6
27.1
16.9
174.3
(56.1)
$ 118.2 $
60.8
55.9
3.1
5.4
—
11.8
137.0
(55.6)
81.4
$
(24.9) $
(790.0)
(25.8)
(4.8)
(845.5)
(23.9)
(783.9)
—
(3.5)
(811.3)
$ (727.3) $ (729.9)
Table of Contents Table of Contents
(1) The majority of this loss carryforward relates to the UK capital loss of $298.0 million, before tax effects, which may
be carried forward without time limitation. There is a full valuation allowance against UK capital losses.
(2) The change in the net deferred tax liabilities does not equal the deferred tax expense due to the FX adjustment on
deferred tax liabilities booked through equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities that relate to the same jurisdiction are recorded net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
as non-current balances and as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows (in millions):
December 31,
2019
2018
Deferred tax assets, net (included in other non-current assets)
Deferred tax liabilities, net
Total deferred tax (liabilities)
$
1.8 $
—
(729.9)
$ (727.3) $ (729.9)
(729.1)
A valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets related to our tax loss carryforward where a
history of losses in the respective tax jurisdiction makes it unlikely that the deferred tax asset will be realized or where it
is unlikely that we would generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character to realize the full benefit of the
deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $0.5 million in 2019. The increase is
primarily attributable to foreign currency translation on capital losses. The foreign net operating losses also slightly
increased during the current year.
As a multinational company, we operate in various locations outside the U.S. and generate earnings from our non-U.S.
subsidiaries. Prior to enactment of the Tax Act, we indefinitely reinvested the undistributed earnings of all of our non-
U.S. subsidiaries, except for income previously taxed in the U.S. or subject to regulatory or legal repatriation restrictions
or requirements. Consistent with prior year’s assertion, we intend to assert indefinite reinvestment on distribution
exceeding the tax basis and undistributed earnings for Janus UK Corp. and Kapstream.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
We operate in several tax jurisdictions and a number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which we
have unrecognized tax benefits, is finally resolved. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the years
ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, is as follows (in millions):
Beginning balance
Balance acquired from the Merger
Additions for tax positions of current year
Additions/(reduction) for tax positions of prior years
Reduction due to settlement with taxing authorities
Reduction due to statute expirations
Foreign currency translation
Ending balance
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
12.4 $
—
—
3.5
—
(1.9)
0.1
14.1 $
10.2 $
—
2.2
1.4
(0.5)
(0.7)
(0.2)
12.4 $
2.5
5.0
3.4
0.8
(0.9)
(0.9)
0.3
10.2
If recognized, the balance would favorably affect our effective tax rate in future periods.
We recognize interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision. At
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the total accrued interest balance relating to uncertain tax positions was $1.7
million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Potential penalties at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were
insignificant and have not been accrued.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, state and local income tax, UK income tax and income tax in several other
jurisdictions, all of which can be examined by the relevant taxing authorities. For our major tax jurisdictions, the tax
years that remain open to examination by the taxing authorities at December 31, 2019, are 2016 and onward for U.S.
92
Table of Contents
(1) The majority of this loss carryforward relates to the UK capital loss of $298.0 million, before tax effects, which may
be carried forward without time limitation. There is a full valuation allowance against UK capital losses.
(2) The change in the net deferred tax liabilities does not equal the deferred tax expense due to the FX adjustment on
deferred tax liabilities booked through equity.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities that relate to the same jurisdiction are recorded net on our Consolidated Balance Sheets
as non-current balances and as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows (in millions):
Deferred tax assets, net (included in other non-current assets)
Deferred tax liabilities, net
Total deferred tax (liabilities)
December 31,
2019
2018
$
1.8 $
—
(729.1)
(729.9)
$ (727.3) $ (729.9)
A valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets related to our tax loss carryforward where a
history of losses in the respective tax jurisdiction makes it unlikely that the deferred tax asset will be realized or where it
is unlikely that we would generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character to realize the full benefit of the
deferred tax asset. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased by $0.5 million in 2019. The increase is
primarily attributable to foreign currency translation on capital losses. The foreign net operating losses also slightly
increased during the current year.
As a multinational company, we operate in various locations outside the U.S. and generate earnings from our non-U.S.
subsidiaries. Prior to enactment of the Tax Act, we indefinitely reinvested the undistributed earnings of all of our non-
U.S. subsidiaries, except for income previously taxed in the U.S. or subject to regulatory or legal repatriation restrictions
or requirements. Consistent with prior year’s assertion, we intend to assert indefinite reinvestment on distribution
exceeding the tax basis and undistributed earnings for Janus UK Corp. and Kapstream.
We operate in several tax jurisdictions and a number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which we
have unrecognized tax benefits, is finally resolved. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for the years
ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, is as follows (in millions):
Beginning balance
Balance acquired from the Merger
Additions for tax positions of current year
Additions/(reduction) for tax positions of prior years
Reduction due to settlement with taxing authorities
Reduction due to statute expirations
Foreign currency translation
Ending balance
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
12.4 $
10.2 $
—
—
3.5
—
(1.9)
0.1
—
2.2
1.4
(0.5)
(0.7)
(0.2)
$
14.1 $
12.4 $
2.5
5.0
3.4
0.8
(0.9)
(0.9)
0.3
10.2
If recognized, the balance would favorably affect our effective tax rate in future periods.
We recognize interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of the income tax provision. At
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the total accrued interest balance relating to uncertain tax positions was $1.7
million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Potential penalties at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, were
insignificant and have not been accrued.
We are subject to U.S. federal income tax, state and local income tax, UK income tax and income tax in several other
jurisdictions, all of which can be examined by the relevant taxing authorities. For our major tax jurisdictions, the tax
years that remain open to examination by the taxing authorities at December 31, 2019, are 2016 and onward for U.S.
federal tax, and a few states have open years from 2013. The tax years from 2015 and onwards remain open for the UK
under the normal four-year time limit.
It is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change within the next 12 months due to
completion of tax authorities’ exams or the expiration of statutes of limitations. Management estimates that the existing
liability for uncertain tax positions could decrease by approximately $0.2 million within the next 12 months, ignoring
changes due to foreign currency translation.
Note 13 — Other Financial Statement Captions
Other current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, are composed of the following
(in millions):
Prepaid expenses
Current corporation tax
Derivatives (including short sale assets)
Other current assets
Total other current assets
December 31,
$
2019
27.4 $
9.5
26.0
53.1
$ 116.0 $
2018
22.6
4.3
3.2
39.3
69.4
Other non-current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets of $149.3 million as of December 31, 2019, primarily
relate to operating leases arising from the implementation of ASC 842 and equity-method investments. The $15.5
million balance as of December 31, 2018, primarily relates to equity-method investments.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, comprise
the following (in millions):
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
December 31,
Accrued distribution commissions
Accrued rebates
Other accrued liabilities
Total other accrued liabilities
Current corporation tax (including interest)
Leases
Contingent consideration
Derivatives (including short sale liabilities)
Other current liabilities
Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
2019
50.8 $
28.5
52.5
2018
42.2
30.2
84.7
$ 131.8 $ 157.1
28.0
1.1
13.8
1.1
32.1
$ 246.0 $ 233.2
12.6
25.7
14.3
35.3
26.3
Other non-current liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019 and 2018, comprise the
following (in millions):
Non-current tax liabilities (including interest)
Leases
Other creditors
Contingent consideration
Other non-current accrued liabilities
Total other non-current liabilities
December 31,
2019
2018
14.9 $
129.5
7.5
6.9
—
158.8 $
10.6
—
10.3
47.5
10.8
79.2
$
$
Other creditors included within other non-current liabilities primarily comprise the non-current portion of lease
obligations as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. As a result of historic acquisitions, we are a party to two material
92
93
Table of Contents Table of Contents
operating leases in respect of 8 Lancelot Place, London, and Rex House, Queen Street, London. The leases run for a
further period of five years and eight years, respectively. At the cease use date of these properties, a loss contingency,
net of expected sub lease rental income, was recognized in respect of these properties as an accrued liability on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets at the net present value of the net expected future cash outflows.
Note 14 — Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, consisted of the following (in millions):
Consolidated seeded investment products
Intech:
Appreciation rights
Founding member ownership interests
Total redeemable noncontrolling interests
Consolidated Seeded Investment Products
December 31,
2019
662.8 $
2018
121.6
$
11.8
3.3
677.9 $
10.9
3.6
136.1
$
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated seeded investment products are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests
when there is an obligation to repurchase units at the investor’s request.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated seed investment products may fluctuate from period to period and
are impacted by changes in our relative ownership, changes in the amount of third-party investment in seeded products
and volatility in the market value of the seeded products’ underlying securities. Third-party redemption of investments is
redeemed from the respective product’s net assets and cannot be redeemed from the assets of other seeded products or
from our other assets.
The following table presents the movement in redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated seeded investment
products for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
Opening balance
Balance acquired from the Merger
Changes in market value
Changes in ownership
Foreign currency translation
Closing balance
Intech
$ 121.6 $ 174.9 $ 158.0
23.2
(9.8)
3.7
(0.2)
$ 662.8 $ 121.6 $ 174.9
—
18.9
509.7
12.6
—
(15.5)
(36.3)
(1.5)
Intech ownership interests held by a founding member had an estimated fair value of $3.3 million as of
December 31, 2019, representing an approximate 1.1% ownership of Intech. This founding member is entitled to retain
his remaining Intech interests for the remainder of his life and has the option to require us to purchase his ownership
interests of Intech at fair value.
Intech appreciation rights are amortized using a graded vesting method over the respective vesting period. The
appreciation rights are exercisable upon termination of employment from Intech to the extent vested. Upon exercise, the
appreciation rights are settled in Intech equity. Refer to Note 15 – Long Term Incentive Compensation for a description
of Intech appreciation rights.
94
Table of Contents
operating leases in respect of 8 Lancelot Place, London, and Rex House, Queen Street, London. The leases run for a
further period of five years and eight years, respectively. At the cease use date of these properties, a loss contingency,
net of expected sub lease rental income, was recognized in respect of these properties as an accrued liability on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets at the net present value of the net expected future cash outflows.
Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows (in millions):
December 31,
2019
2018
$
$
6.7 $
13.0
19.7 $
8.3
13.2
21.5
Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in:
Seed capital investments
Intech
Total nonredeemable noncontrolling interests
Note 15 — Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We operate the following stock-based compensation plans:
● Deferred Equity Plan
● Restricted Share Plan
● Buy As You Earn Share Plan
● Sharesave Plan
● Company Share Option Plan
● Executive Shared Ownership Plan
● Restricted Stock Awards
● Price Vesting Units
● Mutual Fund Share Awards
● Long-Term Incentive Plan
● Employee Share Ownership Plan
● Other awards.
The following table presents the movement in redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated seeded investment
Deferred Equity Plan (“DEP”)
products for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Further details on the material plans in operation during 2019 are discussed below.
Employees who receive cash-based incentive awards over a preset threshold, have an element deferred. The deferred
awards are deferred into our common stock or into our managed funds. The DEP trustee purchases JHG common stock
and units or shares in JHG-managed funds and holds them in trust. Awards are deferred for up to three years and vest in
three equal tranches if employees satisfy employment conditions at each vesting date.
The expense of deferred short-term incentive awards is recognized in net income over the period of deferral on a graded
basis, the fair value of which is determined by prevailing share price or unit price at grant date.
Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”)
The RSP allows employees to receive shares of our common stock for nil consideration at a future point, usually after
three years. RSP is recognized in net income on a graded basis. The awards are typically granted for staff recruitment
and retention purposes; all awards have employment conditions and larger awards can be subject to performance hurdles.
Our Compensation Committee approves all awards to Code Staff (employees who perform a significant influence
function, senior management and individuals whose professional activities could have a material impact on our risk
profile), and any awards over £500,000. The fair value of the shares granted is calculated using the NYSE average
high/low trading prices on grant date.
Buy As You Earn Share Plan (“BAYE”)
The BAYE is an HMRC-approved plan. Eligible employees purchase shares of our common stock by investing monthly,
up to £150 (annual limit £1,800), which is deducted from their gross salary. For each share purchased (“partnership
94
95
Redeemable noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, consisted of the following (in millions):
Note 14 — Noncontrolling Interests
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Consolidated seeded investment products
Intech:
Appreciation rights
Founding member ownership interests
Total redeemable noncontrolling interests
Consolidated Seeded Investment Products
December 31,
2019
2018
$
662.8 $
121.6
11.8
3.3
10.9
3.6
$
677.9 $
136.1
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated seeded investment products are classified as redeemable noncontrolling interests
when there is an obligation to repurchase units at the investor’s request.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated seed investment products may fluctuate from period to period and
are impacted by changes in our relative ownership, changes in the amount of third-party investment in seeded products
and volatility in the market value of the seeded products’ underlying securities. Third-party redemption of investments is
redeemed from the respective product’s net assets and cannot be redeemed from the assets of other seeded products or
from our other assets.
Opening balance
Balance acquired from the Merger
Changes in market value
Changes in ownership
Foreign currency translation
Closing balance
Intech
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$ 121.6 $ 174.9 $ 158.0
—
18.9
509.7
12.6
—
(15.5)
(36.3)
(1.5)
23.2
(9.8)
3.7
(0.2)
$ 662.8 $ 121.6 $ 174.9
Intech ownership interests held by a founding member had an estimated fair value of $3.3 million as of
December 31, 2019, representing an approximate 1.1% ownership of Intech. This founding member is entitled to retain
his remaining Intech interests for the remainder of his life and has the option to require us to purchase his ownership
interests of Intech at fair value.
Intech appreciation rights are amortized using a graded vesting method over the respective vesting period. The
appreciation rights are exercisable upon termination of employment from Intech to the extent vested. Upon exercise, the
appreciation rights are settled in Intech equity. Refer to Note 15 – Long Term Incentive Compensation for a description
of Intech appreciation rights.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
share”), one free matching share is awarded for no additional payment. Matching shares will be forfeited if purchased
shares are withdrawn from the trust within one year.
The non-UK version of the BAYE operates on a similar basis to that of the UK, but matched partnership shares are not
subject to forfeiture.
Sharesave Plan (“SAYE”)
The SAYE is an HMRC-approved plan. UK employees may participate in more than one SAYE scheme but only up to a
maximum of £500 per month in aggregate. Employees who participate in the SAYE contribute a monthly amount from
their net salary to a savings account. The SAYE vesting period is three years for UK employees.
At the end of the three-year vesting period, employees in the SAYE can exercise their share options using the funds in
their savings account to subscribe for shares at a pre-set price. The pre-set price was £14.76 per share, £20.16 per share
and £18.40 per share for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and represents a 20% discount to the average share price
five business days prior to the award. Employees have up to six months after the three-year vesting period to exercise
their options and subscribe for shares. Forfeiture provisions apply in the case of approved and unapproved leavers.
The U.S. Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) operates on the same principles as the UK SAYE, but has a two-year
savings period and a lower discount at 15%. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, ESPP was not offered to U.S. employees. The pre-
set option price of prior year awards was $31.20 for 2016 ESPP. Employees may participate in more than one plan, but
only up to a plan maximum of $312.50 per month across all plans.
Company Share Option Plan (“CSOP”)
CSOP is an HMRC-approved share option plan with the maximum value of unvested options at any time limited to
£30,000 for UK employees. No such restrictions apply for overseas employees. Employees can buy shares of our
common stock after a three-year vesting period at an option price fixed at the start of the scheme. There are no JHG
performance conditions attached to the options, only employment conditions that must be satisfied. The exercise period
is two years, while U.S. employees have three months to exercise. Executive directors are not eligible to participate in
the CSOP, but they may hold awards made prior to their executive appointment. The CSOP plans are valued using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and recognized in net income on a straight-line basis. There were no CSOP awards
made for the years 2019 and 2018. The option price for the 2017 CSOP was £22.80, and this became available to
exercise for U.S. employees in April 2019 as the U.S. CSOP is a two-year plan. The 2016 CSOP became available to
exercise for UK employees in April 2019; the option price was £26.10.
Executive Shared Ownership Plan (“ExSOP”)
The ExSOP is an employee share ownership plan and is aimed at encouraging employee share ownership at the middle
management level. Executive directors do not participate in the ExSOP.
Certain employees are invited to acquire jointly, with an employee benefit trust, the beneficial interest in a number of
JHG shares under the terms of a joint ownership agreement (“JOA”). Under a JOA, the employee will benefit from any
growth in value in excess of a hurdle price fixed at the time of the award subject to employment conditions being
satisfied on the vesting date.
The ExSOP scheme is valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model and is recognized in net income on a
straight-line basis. There were no ExSOP awards made for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The market
price per share at grant for the 2017 ExSOP was £22.62, with a hurdle price per share set at £24.90. The shares have a
three-year vesting period with a subsequent two-year exercise period. The 2016 ExSOP became exercisable for
employees in April 2019 with a market price at grant of £26.14 and a hurdle price of £28.45.
96
Table of Contents share”), one free matching share is awarded for no additional payment. Matching shares will be forfeited if purchased
Restricted Stock Awards (“RSA”)
shares are withdrawn from the trust within one year.
The non-UK version of the BAYE operates on a similar basis to that of the UK, but matched partnership shares are not
subject to forfeiture.
Sharesave Plan (“SAYE”)
The SAYE is an HMRC-approved plan. UK employees may participate in more than one SAYE scheme but only up to a
maximum of £500 per month in aggregate. Employees who participate in the SAYE contribute a monthly amount from
their net salary to a savings account. The SAYE vesting period is three years for UK employees.
At the end of the three-year vesting period, employees in the SAYE can exercise their share options using the funds in
their savings account to subscribe for shares at a pre-set price. The pre-set price was £14.76 per share, £20.16 per share
and £18.40 per share for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and represents a 20% discount to the average share price
five business days prior to the award. Employees have up to six months after the three-year vesting period to exercise
their options and subscribe for shares. Forfeiture provisions apply in the case of approved and unapproved leavers.
RSAs are generally issued as part of annual variable compensation and for recruitment and retention purposes in
accordance with the Amended and Restated 2010 LTI Plan, the JCG 2005 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan and the 2012
EIA Plan. Awards generally vest over a three- or four-year period.
Price-Vesting Units
JCG granted 137,178 price-vesting units to its CEO on December 31, 2014, valued at $2.2 million. At the Closing Date,
the price-vesting units were converted to JHG price-vesting units with a value of $2.3 million and were measured based
on operating profit margin performance and converted into a time-based award vesting on December 31, 2017. On
December 31, 2017, 75,634 price-vesting units vested.
JCG granted 138,901 price-vesting units to its CEO on December 31, 2015, valued at $1.9 million. At the Closing Date,
the price-vesting units were converted to 65,548 JHG price-vesting units with a value of $2.0 million. Vesting of these
price-vesting units was subject to our three-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) performance relative to a peer group
over a three-year period following the grant date. On December 31, 2018, 38,236 price-vesting units vested.
The U.S. Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) operates on the same principles as the UK SAYE, but has a two-year
savings period and a lower discount at 15%. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, ESPP was not offered to U.S. employees. The pre-
set option price of prior year awards was $31.20 for 2016 ESPP. Employees may participate in more than one plan, but
only up to a plan maximum of $312.50 per month across all plans.
JCG granted 134,666 price-vesting units to its CEO on December 31, 2016, valued at $1.8 million. At the Closing Date,
the price-vesting units were converted to 63,549 JHG price-vesting units with a value of $2.0 million. The performance
criteria remained in place post-Merger through the life of the price-vesting units. On December 31, 2019, 23,831 price-
vesting units vested.
Company Share Option Plan (“CSOP”)
CSOP is an HMRC-approved share option plan with the maximum value of unvested options at any time limited to
£30,000 for UK employees. No such restrictions apply for overseas employees. Employees can buy shares of our
common stock after a three-year vesting period at an option price fixed at the start of the scheme. There are no JHG
performance conditions attached to the options, only employment conditions that must be satisfied. The exercise period
is two years, while U.S. employees have three months to exercise. Executive directors are not eligible to participate in
the CSOP, but they may hold awards made prior to their executive appointment. The CSOP plans are valued using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and recognized in net income on a straight-line basis. There were no CSOP awards
made for the years 2019 and 2018. The option price for the 2017 CSOP was £22.80, and this became available to
exercise for U.S. employees in April 2019 as the U.S. CSOP is a two-year plan. The 2016 CSOP became available to
exercise for UK employees in April 2019; the option price was £26.10.
Executive Shared Ownership Plan (“ExSOP”)
Certain employees are invited to acquire jointly, with an employee benefit trust, the beneficial interest in a number of
JHG shares under the terms of a joint ownership agreement (“JOA”). Under a JOA, the employee will benefit from any
growth in value in excess of a hurdle price fixed at the time of the award subject to employment conditions being
satisfied on the vesting date.
The ExSOP scheme is valued using the Black Scholes option pricing model and is recognized in net income on a
straight-line basis. There were no ExSOP awards made for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The market
price per share at grant for the 2017 ExSOP was £22.62, with a hurdle price per share set at £24.90. The shares have a
three-year vesting period with a subsequent two-year exercise period. The 2016 ExSOP became exercisable for
employees in April 2019 with a market price at grant of £26.14 and a hurdle price of £28.45.
We granted a total of 108,184 price-vesting units to our co-CEOs on February 28, 2018, valued at $3.7 million. These
price-vesting units may or may not vest in whole or in part three years after the date of grant, depending on our three-
year TSR performance relative to a peer group during the vesting period.
We granted 83,863 price vesting units to our CEO on February 28, 2019, valued at $2.0 million. These price vesting
units may or may not vest in whole or in part, three years after the date of grant, depending on our three-year TSR
performance relative to a peer group during the vesting period.
Mutual Fund Share Awards (“MFSA”)
MFSAs are generally issued as part of annual variable compensation and for recruitment and retention purposes. At
December 31, 2019, the cost basis of unvested mutual fund share awards totaled $79.3 million. The awards are indexed
to certain mutual funds managed by us. Upon vesting, participants receive the value of the award adjusted for gains or
losses attributable to the mutual funds to which the award was indexed, subject to tax withholding. The awards are time-
based awards that generally vest three or four years from the grant date.
The ExSOP is an employee share ownership plan and is aimed at encouraging employee share ownership at the middle
management level. Executive directors do not participate in the ExSOP.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
In October 2014, Intech granted long-term incentive awards to retain and incentivize employees. The awards consisted
of appreciation rights, profits interests and phantom interests, and are designed to give recipients an equity-like stake in
Intech. Upon the Closing Date of the Merger, the appreciation rights had fair value of $13.3 million, which is being
amortized using a graded basis over the 10-year vesting schedule. The appreciation rights are exercisable upon
termination of employment from Intech and to the extent vested. Upon exercise, the appreciation rights are settled in
Intech equity.
The profits interests and phantom interest awards entitle recipients to 9.0% of Intech’s pre-incentive profits.
Additional appreciation rights were granted in February 2015 and March 2016. Upon the closing date of the Merger, the
2015 and 2016 appreciation rights had fair value of $0.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, which is being amortized
using a graded basis over the remaining vesting schedule. The appreciation rights are exercisable upon termination of
employment from Intech and to the extent vested. Upon exercise, the appreciation rights are settled in Intech equity.
96
97
Table of Contents Table of Contents The fair values of the appreciation rights were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions:
Assumptions
October 2014 February 2015 March 2016
grant
grant
grant
Dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life (in years)
Grant date fair value (in millions)
Merger date fair value (in millions)
1.98 %
34 %
2.53 %
12
23.2
13.3
$
$
2.56 %
30 %
1.81 %
6
2.0
0.9
$
$
2.89 %
28 %
1.93 %
6
2.6
1.8
$
$
The dividend yield and expected volatility were determined using historical data from publicly traded peers. The
risk-free interest rate for the 2014 grant is based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note at the time of the grant while the risk-
free interest rates for the 2015 and 2016 grants are based on the average of the five-year and seven-year U.S. Treasury
notes at the time of the grant. The expected life of the appreciation rights was estimated based upon the assumption that
recipients terminate upon vesting and exercise a certain percentage of their rights each year over the following four
years.
Intech profits interests and phantom interests entitle holders to periodic distributions of a portion of Intech operating
income. Distributions are made during employment and, for profits interests, post-employment for up to 10 years.
Phantom interests are entitled to a one-time distribution at termination of employment. Compensation expense for
post-employment distributions is based upon the present value of expected future distributions and will be recognized
pro rata over the 10-year vesting schedule for profits interests and five years for phantom interests. The present value of
these payments was determined using a 2% discount rate, which represents the interest rate on a 20-year U.S. Treasury
note. As of December 31, 2019, the total undiscounted estimated post-employment payments for profits interests and
phantom interests was $27.7 million (the majority will not be paid until 10 to 20 years after the grant date). The
estimated post-employment payments will be evaluated and adjusted quarterly, as necessary, with changes recorded in
results of operations. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the liability associated with the Intech profits
interests and phantom interests was $13.2 million and is included in Accrued compensation, benefits and staff costs on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)
LTIP awards provide selected employees restricted shares or nil cost options that have employment and performance
conditions. Employees who have been awarded such options have five years to exercise following the three-year vesting
period for 2013 LTIP, and following the three and four-year vesting periods for 2014 LTIP.
For 2014 LTIP, if our TSR is between the 50th and 75th percentiles, the amount vesting will increase on a linear basis.
Our Compensation Committee must also be satisfied that our TSR reflects the underlying performance of the company.
The performance hurdle was 95% relative to our TSR and 5% on risk and sustainability metrics. Employees must also
satisfy employment conditions at each anniversary date for the shares to vest.
Two-thirds of the 2015 and 2016 LTIP can be exercised from the end of year three and one-third from the end of year
four.
98
Table of Contents
The fair values of the appreciation rights were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions:
The 2015 and 2016 LTIP award vesting and release of the award are subject to performance against the following
performance conditions measured (as appropriate) over, or at the end of, the relevant three- or four-year performance
period (in respect of the first and second tranche of the award, respectively):
Dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life (in years)
Grant date fair value (in millions)
Merger date fair value (in millions)
$
$
Assumptions
October 2014 February 2015 March 2016
grant
grant
grant
1.98 %
34 %
2.53 %
12
23.2
13.3
$
$
2.56 %
30 %
1.81 %
6
2.0
0.9
$
$
2.89 %
28 %
1.93 %
6
2.6
1.8
The dividend yield and expected volatility were determined using historical data from publicly traded peers. The
risk-free interest rate for the 2014 grant is based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note at the time of the grant while the risk-
free interest rates for the 2015 and 2016 grants are based on the average of the five-year and seven-year U.S. Treasury
notes at the time of the grant. The expected life of the appreciation rights was estimated based upon the assumption that
recipients terminate upon vesting and exercise a certain percentage of their rights each year over the following four
years.
Intech profits interests and phantom interests entitle holders to periodic distributions of a portion of Intech operating
income. Distributions are made during employment and, for profits interests, post-employment for up to 10 years.
Phantom interests are entitled to a one-time distribution at termination of employment. Compensation expense for
post-employment distributions is based upon the present value of expected future distributions and will be recognized
pro rata over the 10-year vesting schedule for profits interests and five years for phantom interests. The present value of
these payments was determined using a 2% discount rate, which represents the interest rate on a 20-year U.S. Treasury
note. As of December 31, 2019, the total undiscounted estimated post-employment payments for profits interests and
phantom interests was $27.7 million (the majority will not be paid until 10 to 20 years after the grant date). The
estimated post-employment payments will be evaluated and adjusted quarterly, as necessary, with changes recorded in
results of operations. As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the liability associated with the Intech profits
interests and phantom interests was $13.2 million and is included in Accrued compensation, benefits and staff costs on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)
LTIP awards provide selected employees restricted shares or nil cost options that have employment and performance
conditions. Employees who have been awarded such options have five years to exercise following the three-year vesting
period for 2013 LTIP, and following the three and four-year vesting periods for 2014 LTIP.
For 2014 LTIP, if our TSR is between the 50th and 75th percentiles, the amount vesting will increase on a linear basis.
Our Compensation Committee must also be satisfied that our TSR reflects the underlying performance of the company.
The performance hurdle was 95% relative to our TSR and 5% on risk and sustainability metrics. Employees must also
satisfy employment conditions at each anniversary date for the shares to vest.
Two-thirds of the 2015 and 2016 LTIP can be exercised from the end of year three and one-third from the end of year
four.
2015 and 2016 awards criteria (pre- Merger)
Market conditions
FTSE 350
ASX 100
Non-market
Net fund flows condition
Investment performance condition
Operating margin condition
People strategy condition
Weighting
25 %
25 %
15 %
15 %
15 %
10 %
Following the completion of the Merger with JCG, our Compensation Committee reviewed the performance metrics
under the existing LTIP plans and proposed changes to ensure that the metrics remain relevant and appropriate for the
objectives and goals of the combined company. 2014 LTIP vesting conditions remain unchanged and the existing
performance metrics were measured as of May 30, 2017, to determine the appropriate level of vesting. The vested
portion of the 2015 and 2016 LTIP awards remain subject to the original metrics (measured at the Merger completion
date) while the new criteria were applied to the unvested portion:
2015 and 2016 awards criteria (post-Merger)
Market conditions
Relative TSR
Non-market
Relative investment performance
Relative net income before tax growth
Weighting
50 %
25 %
25 %
In respect of the first tranche of the award, an additional holding period of two years will apply commencing on the
relevant vesting date, during which time the participant may not sell, pledge, charge, assign, dispose of or otherwise
transfer ownership of the underlying share pertaining to the award other than to meet mandatory liabilities to tax and/or
Social Security contributions. In respect of the second tranche of the award, an additional holding period of one year will
apply commencing on the relevant vesting date with similar conditions.
The performance period for the first tranche of 2014 LTIP was completed on December 31, 2016, and 3% of awards
vested in April 2017. The performance period for the second tranche of 2014 LTIP was completed on December 31,
2017, and 3% of awards vested in April 2018. The Monte Carlo model was used to value the options of the 2015 and
2016 plans.
The performance period for the first tranche of 2015 LTIP was completed on December 31, 2017. 25% of the
pre-Merger awards and 74.6% of the post-Merger awards vested in April 2018. The performance period for the second
tranche of 2015 LTIP was completed on December 31, 2018. 25% of the pre-Merger awards and 35.5% of the
post-Merger awards vested in April 2019.
The performance period for the first tranche of 2016 LTIP was completed on December 31, 2018. 25% of the
pre-Merger awards and 35.5% of the post-Merger awards vested in April 2019. The performance period for the second
tranche of 2016 LTIP was completed on December 31, 2019. Vesting of the second tranche will be determined in March
2020 and the awards will vest in April 2020.
98
99
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Compensation Expense
The components of our long-term incentive compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017, are summarized as follows (in millions):
$
DEP
LTIP
RSP
BAYE
ExSOP
CSOP
SAYE
RSA (including PVUs)
ESOP
Stock-based payments expense
DEP Funds - liability settled
MFSA - liability settled
Profits interests and other
Social Security costs
Year ended December 31,
2018
18.7 $
2.6
10.1
3.0
0.8
0.6
0.9
44.9
—
81.6
54.9
24.3
18.4
9.4
2019
19.1 $
1.3
8.3
2.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
42.2
—
73.7
57.5
46.2
(3.9)
10.8
2017
17.6
6.4
3.4
3.2
1.5
1.1
0.8
32.8
—
66.8
41.4
20.7
12.3
10.3
Total charge to the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income
$ 184.3 $ 188.6 $ 151.5
At December 31, 2019, unrecognized and unearned compensation, based on expected vesting outcomes as of
December 31, 2019, on the 2016 LTIP, and the weighted-average number of years over which the compensation cost
will be recognized are summarized as follows (in millions):
DEP
LTIP
RSP
BAYE
ExSOP
CSOP
SAYE
RSA
Stock-based payments expense
DEP Funds - liability settled
MFSA - liability settled
Profits interests and other
Social Security costs
Total remaining charge to the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income
Weighted-
Unrecognized
compensation
13.5
$
0.1
6.8
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.7
37.9
59.6
28.8
30.1
14.4
19.1
average
years
1.4
0.2
1.6
0.5
0.2
0.2
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.3
2.1
4.5
0.9
$
152.0
1.8
We generally grant annual long-term incentive awards in March and April in relation to annual awards but also
throughout the year due to seasonality of performance fee bonuses.
100
Table of Contents
Compensation Expense
Stock Options
The components of our long-term incentive compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017, are summarized as follows (in millions):
Stock options were granted to employees in 2019, 2018 and 2017. The fair value of stock options granted were estimated
on the date of each grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and a Monte Carlo model, with the following
assumptions:
Total charge to the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income
$ 184.3 $ 188.6 $ 151.5
At December 31, 2019, unrecognized and unearned compensation, based on expected vesting outcomes as of
December 31, 2019, on the 2016 LTIP, and the weighted-average number of years over which the compensation cost
will be recognized are summarized as follows (in millions):
RSA (including PVUs)
Stock-based payments expense
DEP Funds - liability settled
MFSA - liability settled
Profits interests and other
Social Security costs
DEP
LTIP
RSP
BAYE
ExSOP
CSOP
SAYE
ESOP
DEP
LTIP
RSP
BAYE
ExSOP
CSOP
SAYE
RSA
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
19.1 $
18.7 $
17.6
1.3
8.3
2.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
42.2
—
73.7
57.5
46.2
(3.9)
10.8
2.6
10.1
3.0
0.8
0.6
0.9
44.9
—
81.6
54.9
24.3
18.4
9.4
6.4
3.4
3.2
1.5
1.1
0.8
32.8
—
66.8
41.4
20.7
12.3
10.3
Weighted-
Unrecognized
average
compensation
years
$
13.5
0.1
6.8
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.7
37.9
59.6
28.8
30.1
14.4
19.1
1.4
0.2
1.6
0.5
0.2
0.2
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.3
2.1
4.5
0.9
Stock-based payments expense
DEP Funds - liability settled
MFSA - liability settled
Profits interests and other
Social Security costs
Total remaining charge to the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income
$
152.0
1.8
We generally grant annual long-term incentive awards in March and April in relation to annual awards but also
throughout the year due to seasonality of performance fee bonuses.
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model
Fair value of options granted
Assumptions:
Dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life (years)
Monte Carlo Model – LTIP 2015
2019
2018
2017
Year ended December 31,
SAYE SAYE CSOP U.S. CSOP ExSOP SAYE
£
32.81 p
27.78 p
33.43 p
75.28 p
2.15 £
4.99
6.92 %
30.17 %
0.55 %
3
3.85 %
32.20 %
0.70 %
3
4.64 %
32.41 %
0.27 %
3
4.64 %
35.19 %
0.16 %
2
4.64 %
32.41 %
0.27 %
3
3.99 %
32.13 %
0.19 %
3
Year ended December 31, 2019
% Allocation
of award
Tranche 1
Tranche 2
Fair Values:
Relative TSR
Relative investment performance
Relative net income before tax growth
Assumptions:
Date of grant
Start of performance period
End of performance period
Vesting date
Date of modification ("DoM")
Share price at DoM
Risk free discount rate
Dividend yield
Share price volatility in GBP
Holding period adjustment
Percentage based on pre-modification performance
conditions
50 %
25 %
25 %
118.96 p
209.76 p
209.76 p
124.11 p
206.59 p
206.59 p
May 1, 2015
January 1, 2015
December 31, 2017
May 1, 2018
May 30, 2017
233.7 p
May 1, 2015
January 1, 2015
December 31, 2018
May 1, 2019
May 30, 2017
233.7 p
0.1 % pa
4.5 % pa
30 % pa
9.0 %
80 %
0.1 % pa
4.5 % pa
30 % pa
6.2 %
60 %
100
101
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Monte Carlo Model – LTIP 2016
Fair values:
Relative TSR
Relative investment performance
Relative net income before tax growth
Assumptions:
Date of grant
Start of performance period
End of performance period
Vesting date
Date of modification ("DoM")
Share price at DoM
Risk free discount rate
Dividend yield
Share price volatility in GBP
Holding period adjustment
Year Ended December 31, 2019
% Allocation
of award
Tranche 1
Tranche 2
50 %
25 %
25 %
120.98 p
200.42 p
200.42 p
123.64 p
197.39 p
197.39 p
May 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
December 31, 2018
March 24, 2019
May 30, 2017
233.7 p
May 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
December 31, 2019
March 24, 2020
May 30, 2017
233.7 p
0.1 % pa
4.5 % pa
30 % pa
9.0 %
0.1 % pa
4.5 % pa
30 % pa
6.2 %
Expected volatility was determined using an average of historical volatility. Expected life was determined using the
vesting periods of each grant. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the options is based on
the UK Treasury three-year coupon rate and two-year coupon rate, respectively, at grant date.
The table below summarizes our outstanding options, exercisable options and options vested or expected to vest for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Outstanding at January 1
Share consolidation
Acquired from Merger
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31
Exercisable (1)
Vested or expected to vest
2019
Weighted-
average
2018
Weighted-
average
2017
Weighted-
average
Shares
price
Shares
price
3,139,762 $ 27.91
—
— $
— $
—
244,336 $ 18.84
(325,134) $ 5.43
(1,185,037) $ 28.30
1,873,927 $ 28.41
91,099 $
—
962,064 $ 32.97
4,319,706 $ 22.55
—
— $
—
— $
84,273 $ 26.88
(212,562) $ 12.31
(1,051,655) $ 11.81
3,139,762 $ 27.91
707,848 $ 33.75
1,157,663 $ 1.51
Shares
price
45,560,242 $ 1.97
(41,004,619) $ 19.82
92,949 $ 18.76
2,042,321 $ 13.66
(404,735) $ 20.32
(1,966,452) $ 7.41
4,319,706 $ 22.55
5,014,642 $ 34.67
2,999,811 $ 15.57
Included in the above table are our nil cost LTIP options, which constitute the majority of forfeitures.
(1) The number of exercisable options represents instruments for which all vesting criteria have been satisfied and
whose exercise price was below the closing price of our common stock as of the end of the period.
102
Table of Contents
Monte Carlo Model – LTIP 2016
Fair values:
Relative TSR
Assumptions:
Date of grant
Relative investment performance
Relative net income before tax growth
Start of performance period
End of performance period
Vesting date
Date of modification ("DoM")
Share price at DoM
Risk free discount rate
Dividend yield
Share price volatility in GBP
Holding period adjustment
Year Ended December 31, 2019
% Allocation
of award
Tranche 1
Tranche 2
50 %
25 %
25 %
120.98 p
200.42 p
200.42 p
123.64 p
197.39 p
197.39 p
May 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
May 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
March 24, 2019
May 30, 2017
233.7 p
March 24, 2020
May 30, 2017
233.7 p
0.1 % pa
4.5 % pa
30 % pa
9.0 %
0.1 % pa
4.5 % pa
30 % pa
6.2 %
Expected volatility was determined using an average of historical volatility. Expected life was determined using the
vesting periods of each grant. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the options is based on
the UK Treasury three-year coupon rate and two-year coupon rate, respectively, at grant date.
The table below summarizes our outstanding options, exercisable options and options vested or expected to vest for the
years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
Outstanding at January 1
Share consolidation
Acquired from Merger
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31
Exercisable (1)
Vested or expected to vest
2019
Weighted-
average
2018
Weighted-
average
2017
Weighted-
average
Shares
price
Shares
price
Shares
price
3,139,762 $ 27.91
4,319,706 $ 22.55
45,560,242 $ 1.97
— $
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
(41,004,619) $ 19.82
92,949 $ 18.76
244,336 $ 18.84
84,273 $ 26.88
2,042,321 $ 13.66
(325,134) $ 5.43
(212,562) $ 12.31
(404,735) $ 20.32
(1,185,037) $ 28.30
(1,051,655) $ 11.81
(1,966,452) $ 7.41
1,873,927 $ 28.41
3,139,762 $ 27.91
4,319,706 $ 22.55
91,099 $
—
707,848 $ 33.75
5,014,642 $ 34.67
962,064 $ 32.97
1,157,663 $ 1.51
2,999,811 $ 15.57
Included in the above table are our nil cost LTIP options, which constitute the majority of forfeitures.
(1) The number of exercisable options represents instruments for which all vesting criteria have been satisfied and
whose exercise price was below the closing price of our common stock as of the end of the period.
The following table summarizes the intrinsic value of exercised, outstanding and exercisable options at
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Exercised
Outstanding
Exercisable
Deferred Equity Plan
December 31,
2018
2017
2019
$
$
$
0.4 $
1.0 $
0.3 $
0.1 $
2.8
0.2 $ 15.9
3.9
0.2 $
The table below summarizes DEP unvested stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
2019
Weighted-
average
2018
Weighted-
average
2017
Weighted-
average
Shares
price
Shares
price
1,738,776 $ 33.41 1,442,091 $ 32.36
— $
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
—
1,403,472 $ 23.63 1,129,504 $ 33.55
(731,596) $ 33.80
(101,223) $ 33.07
2,119,950 $ 26.98 1,738,776 $ 33.41
(828,953) $ 31.44
(193,345) $ 28.42
Shares
price
16,466,630 $ 3.17
(14,825,509) $ 31.64
1,275 $ 15.43
919,967 $ 31.40
(873,810) $ 31.33
(246,462) $ 28.06
1,442,091 $ 32.36
Outstanding at January 1
Share consolidation
Adjustment
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested at December 31
Restricted Stock Awards
The table below summarizes unvested restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
2019
2018
2017
Shares
Weighted-
Weighted-
average
price
3,378,150 $ 32.35
1,395,824 $ 24.37
Weighted-
average
price
3,537,221 $ 30.81 4,068,619 $ 30.72
73,982 $ 35.08
1,107,382 $ 35.57
(444,884) $ 30.73
(1,238,185) $ 31.92 (1,197,671) $ 30.76
(160,496) $ 30.72
(68,782) $ 32.49
3,378,150 $ 32.35 3,537,221 $ 30.81
(138,819) $ 30.72
3,396,970 $ 29.30
average
price
Shares
Shares
Outstanding at January 1
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Unvested at December 31
Note 16 — Retirement Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Plans
We operate two separate defined contribution retirement benefit plans: a 401(k) plan for U.S. employees and a separate
plan for international employees.
Substantially all of our U.S. full-time employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. During the year ended
December 31, 2019, we matched 5.0% of employee-eligible compensation in our 401(k) plan.
Expenses related to our 401(k) plan are included in employee compensation and benefits on our Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income and were $7.9 million and $5.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. The assets of the plan are held in trustee-administered funds separately from our assets.
Substantially all of our non-U.S. full-time employees are eligible to participate in our defined contribution plans. The
total amounts charged to our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended
102
103
Table of Contents Table of Contents
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, in respect of our non-U.S. defined contribution plan was $10.4 million, $7.5 million
and $11.8 million, respectively, which represents contributions paid or payable to this plan by us.
Defined Benefit Plans
The main defined benefit pension plan sponsored by us is the defined benefit section of the Janus Henderson Group UK
Pension Scheme (“JHGPS” or the “Plan”), previously the Henderson Group Pension Scheme, which closed to new
members on November 15, 1999. The JHGPS is funded by contributions to a separately administered fund.
Benefits in the defined benefit section of the JHGPS are based on service and final salary. The plan is approved by
HMRC for tax purposes and is operated separately from the Group and managed by an independent trustee board. The
trustee is responsible for payment of the benefits and management of the JHGPS assets. We also have a contractual
obligation to provide certain members of the JHGPS with additional defined benefits on an unfunded basis.
The JHGPS is subject to UK regulations, which require us and the trustee to agree to a funding strategy and contribution
schedule for the scheme.
Our latest triennial valuation of the JHGPS resulted in a surplus on a technical provisions basis of £12.0 million ($15.9
million).
Plan assets and benefit obligations
The Plan assets and defined benefit obligations of the JHGPS and the unapproved pension plan were valued as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018. Our plan assets, benefit obligations and funded status as of the December 31 measurement
date were as follows (in millions):
$
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1
Return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Settlements
Foreign currency translation
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation as of January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Settlements
Plan amendments
Benefits paid
Actuarial gain (loss)
Foreign currency translation
Benefit obligation as of December 31
Funded status as of year-end
Tax at source
Net retirement benefit asset recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
$
104
December 31,
2019
2018
849.5 $
100.1
2.0
(14.8)
(25.4)
34.5
945.9
(613.3)
(0.8)
(17.4)
25.4
—
14.8
(86.8)
(25.1)
(703.2)
242.7
(33.1)
209.6 $
941.8
(11.1)
12.5
(14.7)
(24.0)
(55.0)
849.5
(719.1)
(1.2)
(17.3)
24.0
(3.9)
14.7
47.6
41.9
(613.3)
236.2
(33.4)
202.8
Table of Contents
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, in respect of our non-U.S. defined contribution plan was $10.4 million, $7.5 million
and $11.8 million, respectively, which represents contributions paid or payable to this plan by us.
Amounts recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, net of tax at source as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, consist
of the following (in millions):
(4.4)
(3.7)
202.8
Net retirement benefit asset recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
$
209.6 $
December 31,
2019
2018
$
214.0 $
206.5
Retirement benefit assets recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Janus Henderson Group UK Pension Scheme
Retirement benefit obligations recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Janus Henderson Group unapproved pension scheme
Defined Benefit Plans
The main defined benefit pension plan sponsored by us is the defined benefit section of the Janus Henderson Group UK
Pension Scheme (“JHGPS” or the “Plan”), previously the Henderson Group Pension Scheme, which closed to new
members on November 15, 1999. The JHGPS is funded by contributions to a separately administered fund.
Benefits in the defined benefit section of the JHGPS are based on service and final salary. The plan is approved by
HMRC for tax purposes and is operated separately from the Group and managed by an independent trustee board. The
trustee is responsible for payment of the benefits and management of the JHGPS assets. We also have a contractual
obligation to provide certain members of the JHGPS with additional defined benefits on an unfunded basis.
The JHGPS is subject to UK regulations, which require us and the trustee to agree to a funding strategy and contribution
Our latest triennial valuation of the JHGPS resulted in a surplus on a technical provisions basis of £12.0 million ($15.9
schedule for the scheme.
million).
Plan assets and benefit obligations
The Plan assets and defined benefit obligations of the JHGPS and the unapproved pension plan were valued as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018. Our plan assets, benefit obligations and funded status as of the December 31 measurement
date were as follows (in millions):
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1
Return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Settlements
Foreign currency translation
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation as of January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Settlements
Plan amendments
Benefits paid
Actuarial gain (loss)
Foreign currency translation
Benefit obligation as of December 31
Funded status as of year-end
Tax at source
December 31,
2019
2018
$
849.5 $
(613.3)
(719.1)
100.1
2.0
(14.8)
(25.4)
34.5
945.9
(0.8)
(17.4)
25.4
—
14.8
(86.8)
(25.1)
(703.2)
242.7
(33.1)
941.8
(11.1)
12.5
(14.7)
(24.0)
(55.0)
849.5
(1.2)
(17.3)
24.0
(3.9)
14.7
47.6
41.9
(613.3)
236.2
(33.4)
202.8
Net retirement benefit asset recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
$
209.6 $
We used the following key assumptions in determining the defined benefit obligation as of December 31, 2019 and
2018:
Discount rate
Inflation - salaries
Inflation - Retail Price Index ("RPI")
Inflation - Consumer Price Index ("CPI")
Pension increases (RPI capped at 5% per annum ("p.a."))
Pension increases (RPI capped at 2.5% p.a.)
Life expectancy of male aged 60 at accounting date
Life expectancy of male aged 60 in 15 years time
December 31,
2019
2018
2.1 %
2.5 %
3.0 %
1.9 %
2.9 %
2.0 %
28.3
29.3
2.9 %
2.5 %
3.1 %
2.0 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
28.2
29.2
The discount rate applied to the plan obligations is based on AA-rated corporate bond yields with similar maturities.
Plan assets
The fair values of the JHGPS plan assets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, by major asset class, are as follows (in
millions):
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market instruments
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Bulk annuity policy
Fixed income investments
Equity investments
Total assets at fair value
December 31,
2019
3.7 $
78.1
—
395.8
261.4
206.9
945.9 $
2018
6.4
21.6
0.3
—
623.2
198.0
849.5
$
$
As of December 31, 2019, $250.9 million of JHGPS assets were held in JHG-managed funds.
On September 5, 2019, JHGPS and Scottish Widows Limited (“SWL”) entered into a pension buy-in agreement (the
“agreement”). The agreement provides JHGPS a monthly contractual payment stream from SWL to satisfy pension
obligations payable to approximately one-third of total plan participants receiving benefits from JHGPS as of December
31, 2019. The agreement does not relieve JHGPS or JHG (as plan sponsor) of the primary responsibility for the pension
obligations. JHGPS paid a premium of approximately £328 million ($404 million) for the agreement and it was recorded
at fair value as a plan asset of JHGPS.
The remaining assets of the JHGPS plan are allocated to a growth portfolio and to fixed income assets. The majority of
the growth portfolio is invested in pooled diversified funds, with the objective of achieving a level of growth greater than
104
105
Table of Contents Table of Contents
the fixed income portfolio. The fixed income portfolio is managed on a segregated basis, with the primary objective of
meeting the cash flows as they mature.
The strategic allocation as of December 31, 2019, was broadly 30% fixed income investments, 40% bulk annuity policy
and 30% growth portfolio.
The following table presents JHGPS plan assets at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 (in millions):
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
and liabilities
identical assets observable inputs unobservable inputs
Significant other
Significant
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market instruments
Bulk annuity contract
Fixed income investments
Equity investments
Total
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
$
$
3.7 $
—
—
261.4
206.9
472.0 $
— $
78.1
—
—
—
78.1 $
(Level 3)
— $
—
395.8
—
—
Total
3.7
78.1
395.8
261.4
206.9
395.8 $ 945.9
The following table presents JHGPS plan assets at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 (in millions):
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
and liabilities
identical assets observable inputs unobservable inputs
Significant other
Significant
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market instruments
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Fixed income investments
Equity investments
Total
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
$
$
6.4 $
—
0.3
619.0
—
625.7 $
— $
21.6
—
4.2
198.0
223.8 $
Total
6.4
— $
21.6
—
0.3
—
623.2
—
198.0
—
— $ 849.5
The expected rate of return on assets for the financial period ending December 31, 2019, was 2.5% p.a. based on
financial conditions as of December 31, 2018 (2018: 2.5% p.a.). This rate is derived by taking the weighted average of
the long-term expected rate of return on each of the asset classes in JHGPS’s target asset allocation. The expected rate of
return has been determined based on yields on either long-dated government bonds or relevant corporate bonds,
dependent on the class of asset in question, adjusted where appropriate based on the individual characteristics of each
asset class.
106
Table of Contents
the fixed income portfolio. The fixed income portfolio is managed on a segregated basis, with the primary objective of
Actuarial gains and losses
Cumulative amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and the actuarial gain, net of tax deducted
at source, credited to other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are shown below
(in millions):
Opening accumulated unamortized actuarial gain
Current year actuarial gain (loss)
Tax at source on current year actuarial gain (loss)
Current year prior service cost
Release of actuarial gain due to settlement event
Release of tax at source due to settlement event
Closing accumulated unamortized actuarial gain
December 31,
2019
24.7 $
(5.5)
0.9
0.4
(2.1)
0.7
19.1 $
2018
21.0
14.4
(6.5)
(3.7)
(1.1)
0.6
24.7
$
$
No actuarial gains were amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended
December 31, 2019 (2018: nil). No actuarial gains are expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income into net periodic benefit cost during 2019.
A high court ruling on October 26, 2018, suggested that most UK pension schemes, including our scheme, will need to
amend benefits to correct for inequalities in “guaranteed minimum pensions.” The estimated impact of this ruling on the
obligations is estimated as $3.7 million, treated as a prior service cost in 2018 to be amortized in future years; the
amount amortized in 2019 was $0.4 million and the amount expected to be amortized in 2020 is $0.4 million. However,
considerable legal and other uncertainties remain, and the ultimate cost of amending benefits could be significantly
higher or lower.
Net periodic benefit cost
The components of net periodic benefit cost in respect of defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2019,
2018 and 2017, include the following (in millions):
meeting the cash flows as they mature.
and 30% growth portfolio.
The strategic allocation as of December 31, 2019, was broadly 30% fixed income investments, 40% bulk annuity policy
The following table presents JHGPS plan assets at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019 (in millions):
The following table presents JHGPS plan assets at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018 (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market instruments
Bulk annuity contract
Fixed income investments
Equity investments
Total
Cash and cash equivalents
Money market instruments
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Fixed income investments
Equity investments
Total
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
and liabilities
Significant other
Significant
identical assets observable inputs unobservable inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Total
$
3.7 $
—
—
261.4
206.9
— $
78.1
—
—
—
$
472.0 $
78.1 $
— $
3.7
—
395.8
—
—
78.1
395.8
261.4
206.9
395.8 $ 945.9
Fair value measurements using:
Quoted prices in
active markets for
and liabilities
Significant other
Significant
identical assets observable inputs unobservable inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Total
$
6.4 $
— $
—
0.3
619.0
—
21.6
—
4.2
198.0
$
625.7 $
223.8 $
— $
6.4
—
—
—
—
21.6
0.3
623.2
198.0
— $ 849.5
The expected rate of return on assets for the financial period ending December 31, 2019, was 2.5% p.a. based on
financial conditions as of December 31, 2018 (2018: 2.5% p.a.). This rate is derived by taking the weighted average of
the long-term expected rate of return on each of the asset classes in JHGPS’s target asset allocation. The expected rate of
return has been determined based on yields on either long-dated government bonds or relevant corporate bonds,
dependent on the class of asset in question, adjusted where appropriate based on the individual characteristics of each
asset class.
Service cost
Settlement gain
Interest cost
Amortization of prior service cost
Expected return on plan assets
Net periodic benefit credit
Contributions to money purchase section
Total cost
$
$
106
107
December 31,
2018
(1.2) $
1.6
(17.3)
—
21.3
4.4
(8.0)
(3.6) $
2019
(0.8) $
2.1
(17.4)
(0.4)
18.6
2.1
(7.9)
(5.8) $
2017
(1.2)
1.6
(19.2)
—
20.3
1.5
(7.4)
(5.9)
Table of Contents Table of Contents
The following key assumptions were used in determining the net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
December 31,
2019
Discount rate
Inflation — salaries
Inflation — RPI
Inflation — CPI
Pension increases (RPI capped at 5% p.a.)
Pension increases (RPI capped at 2.5% p.a.)
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization period for net actuarial gains at beginning of the year 10.0
2.9 %
2.5 %
3.1 %
2.0 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
2.5 %
2018
2.6 %
2.5 %
3.1 %
2.0 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
2.5 %
11.0
2017
2.9 %
2.5 %
3.2 %
2.1 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
2.6 %
11.0
Cash flows
Employer contributions of $2.0 million were paid in relation to our defined benefit pension plans during 2019 (excluding
credits to members’ Money purchase accounts). We expect to contribute approximately $0.8 million to the JHGPS
(excluding credits to members’ Money purchase accounts) in the year ended December 31, 2020.
The expected future benefit payments for our pension plan are as follows (in millions):
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2029
$
$
$
$
$
$
22.9
20.1
22.0
23.7
25.0
131.1
Note 17 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as
follows (in millions):
Year ended December 31,
2019
Retirement
benefit
Foreign
2018
Retirement
benefit
Foreign
Beginning balance
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Less: other comprehensive loss (income)
attributable to noncontrolling interests
Ending balance
currency asset, net Total
$ (448.2) $
74.7
24.7 $ (423.5) $ (325.3) $
(5.6)
(124.3)
69.1
21.0 $ (304.3)
(120.6)
3.7
currency asset, net Total
(12.7)
$ (386.2) $
—
(12.7)
1.4
19.1 $ (367.1) $ (448.2) $
—
1.4
24.7 $ (423.5)
The components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017, are as follows (in millions):
Year ended December 31, 2019
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Retirement benefit asset, net
Reclassifications to net income
Total other comprehensive loss
Pre-tax
amount
Tax
expense
Net amount
74.7
(4.2)
(1.4)
69.1
0.4 $
(0.1)
—
0.3 $
$
$
74.3 $
(4.1)
(1.4)
68.8 $
108
Table of Contents
The following key assumptions were used in determining the net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Discount rate
Inflation — salaries
Inflation — RPI
Inflation — CPI
Pension increases (RPI capped at 5% p.a.)
Pension increases (RPI capped at 2.5% p.a.)
Expected return on plan assets
December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2.9 %
2.5 %
3.1 %
2.0 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
2.5 %
2.6 %
2.5 %
3.1 %
2.0 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
2.5 %
2.9 %
2.5 %
3.2 %
2.1 %
3.0 %
2.1 %
2.6 %
Amortization period for net actuarial gains at beginning of the year 10.0
11.0
11.0
Cash flows
Employer contributions of $2.0 million were paid in relation to our defined benefit pension plans during 2019 (excluding
credits to members’ Money purchase accounts). We expect to contribute approximately $0.8 million to the JHGPS
(excluding credits to members’ Money purchase accounts) in the year ended December 31, 2020.
The expected future benefit payments for our pension plan are as follows (in millions):
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2029
$
$
$
$
$
$
22.9
20.1
22.0
23.7
25.0
131.1
Note 17 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as
follows (in millions):
Beginning balance
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Less: other comprehensive loss (income)
attributable to noncontrolling interests
Ending balance
Year ended December 31,
2019
Retirement
2018
Retirement
Foreign
benefit
Foreign
benefit
currency asset, net Total
currency asset, net Total
$ (448.2) $
24.7 $ (423.5) $ (325.3) $
21.0 $ (304.3)
74.7
(5.6)
69.1
(124.3)
3.7
(120.6)
(12.7)
—
(12.7)
1.4
—
1.4
$ (386.2) $
19.1 $ (367.1) $ (448.2) $
24.7 $ (423.5)
The components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and
2017, are as follows (in millions):
Year ended December 31, 2019
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Retirement benefit asset, net
Reclassifications to net income
Total other comprehensive loss
Pre-tax
amount
Tax
expense
Net amount
$
74.3 $
0.4 $
(4.1)
(1.4)
(0.1)
—
$
68.8 $
0.3 $
74.7
(4.2)
(1.4)
69.1
Year ended December 31, 2018
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Retirement benefit asset, net
Reclassifications to net income
Total other comprehensive income
Year ended December 31, 2017
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Retirement benefit asset, net
Reclassifications to net income
Total other comprehensive income loss
Note 18 — Earnings and Dividends Per Share
Earnings Per Share
Pre-tax
amount
(124.3) $
4.2
(1.1)
(121.2) $
$
$
Tax
benefit
Net amount
(124.3)
4.8
(1.1)
(120.6)
— $
0.6
—
0.6 $
Pre-tax
amount
Tax
expense
$
$
1.9 $
125.0
(10.2)
(4.4)
112.3 $
Net amount
1.9
125.0
(10.6)
(4.4)
111.9
— $
—
(0.4)
—
(0.4) $
The following is a summary of the earnings per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
(in millions, except per share data):
Net income attributable to JHG
Less: Allocation of earnings to participating stock-based awards
Net income attributable to JHG common shareholders
Year ended December 31,
2018
523.8 $
(12.7)
511.1 $
2019
427.6 $
(11.7)
415.9 $
2017
655.5
(17.3)
638.2
$
$
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic
Dilutive effect of non-participating stock-based awards
Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted
188.0
0.6
188.6
195.0
0.9
195.9
160.7
1.6
162.3
Earnings per share:
Basic (two class)
Diluted (two class)
$
$
2.21 $
2.21 $
2.62 $
2.61 $
3.97
3.93
The share numbers in the table above have been updated to reflect the share consolidation on April 26, 2017. Refer to
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the share consolidation.
The following instruments are anti-dilutive and have not been included in the weighted-average diluted shares
outstanding calculation (in millions):
Unvested nonparticipating stock awards
Dai-ichi options
Dividends Per Share
Year ended
December 31,
2018
2017
2019
1.1
—
1.0
—
0.8
10.0
The payment of cash dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends on many factors,
including, but not limited to, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, legal requirements and
general business conditions. Since the Closing Date, we have declared dividends quarterly in USD; prior to the Merger,
Henderson declared dividends in GBP on a semiannual basis, with an extraordinary first quarter 2017 dividend declared
on April 19, 2017.
108
109
Table of Contents Table of Contents
The following is a summary of cash dividends declared and paid for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,
in GBP and USD:
Dividends paid per share — pre-Merger — in GBP
Dividends paid per share — post-Merger — in USD
Year ended December 31,
2018
2017
2019
£
$
— £
— £ 0.0915
1.4400 $ 1.4000 $ 0.6400
The pre-Merger share numbers in the table above have not been updated to reflect the share consolidation on April 26,
2017. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the share
consolidation.
Note 19 — Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and contingencies may arise in the normal course of business. Commitments and contingencies as of
December 31, 2019, are discussed below.
Operating and Finance Leases
As of December 31, 2019, we had future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating and finance
leases. Refer to Note 8 — Leases for information related to operating and financing lease commitments.
Litigation and Other Regulatory Matters
We are periodically involved in various legal proceedings and other regulatory matters.
Richard Pease v. Henderson Administration Limited
The outcome of a court case involving an ex-employee was determined in the first quarter of 2018. The case related to
the fees we should receive after a fund was transferred to an ex-employee (the “Fund Transfer Fees”) and the
ex-employee’s entitlement to deferred and forfeited remuneration. The judgment given in the case resulted in our
recognition of a $12.2 million charge in general, administrative and occupancy on our Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income after the judge held that the ex-employee was not bound to pay the Fund Transfer Fees and that
the ex-employee’s contract gave him an entitlement to deferred and forfeited remuneration. The amount of the charge
also included legal costs relating to the case. Henderson Administration Limited (“HAL”), a wholly owned subsidiary of
JHG, appealed the part of the judgment relating to the Fund Transfer Fees, and judgment was handed down by the Court
of Appeal of England and Wales on February 15, 2019, in favor of HAL. As a result, we were awarded the Fund
Transfer Fees and related interest of approximately $5.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively. HAL will also be entitled
to certain costs relating to the appeal and the earlier trial insofar as they relate to the Fund Transfer Fees claim. On
November 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom refused the ex-employee’s application for permission to
appeal the Court of Appeal’s judgment. Accordingly, the Group recorded the award in its financial statements.
Eisenberg v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices, Halbert v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices, Qiu v. Credit Suisse
AG and Janus Indices and Y-GAR Capital v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices, and Rubinstein v. Credit Suisse Group
AG and Janus Indices
On March 15, 2018, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (“SDNY”) against Janus Index & Calculation Services LLC, which effective January 1, 2019, was renamed Janus
Henderson Indices LLC (“Janus Indices”), a subsidiary of JHG, on behalf of a class consisting of investors who
purchased VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term ETN (Ticker: XIV) between January 29, 2018, and February
5, 2018 (Eisenberg v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices). Credit Suisse, the issuer of the XIV notes, is also named as a
defendant in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs generally allege statements by Credit Suisse and Janus Indices, including those in
the registration statement, were materially false and misleading based on its discussion of how the intraday indicative
value (“IIV”) is calculated and that the IIV was not an accurate gauge of the economic value of the notes. On April 17,
2018, a second lawsuit was filed against Janus Indices and Credit Suisse in the United States District Court of the
Northern District of Alabama by certain investors in XIV (Halbert v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices). On May 4,
110
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of cash dividends declared and paid for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,
in GBP and USD:
Dividends paid per share — pre-Merger — in GBP
Dividends paid per share — post-Merger — in USD
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
£
$
— £
— £ 0.0915
1.4400 $ 1.4000 $ 0.6400
The pre-Merger share numbers in the table above have not been updated to reflect the share consolidation on April 26,
2017. Refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the share
consolidation.
Note 19 — Commitments and Contingencies
December 31, 2019, are discussed below.
Operating and Finance Leases
Commitments and contingencies may arise in the normal course of business. Commitments and contingencies as of
As of December 31, 2019, we had future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating and finance
leases. Refer to Note 8 — Leases for information related to operating and financing lease commitments.
Litigation and Other Regulatory Matters
We are periodically involved in various legal proceedings and other regulatory matters.
Richard Pease v. Henderson Administration Limited
The outcome of a court case involving an ex-employee was determined in the first quarter of 2018. The case related to
the fees we should receive after a fund was transferred to an ex-employee (the “Fund Transfer Fees”) and the
ex-employee’s entitlement to deferred and forfeited remuneration. The judgment given in the case resulted in our
recognition of a $12.2 million charge in general, administrative and occupancy on our Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income after the judge held that the ex-employee was not bound to pay the Fund Transfer Fees and that
the ex-employee’s contract gave him an entitlement to deferred and forfeited remuneration. The amount of the charge
also included legal costs relating to the case. Henderson Administration Limited (“HAL”), a wholly owned subsidiary of
JHG, appealed the part of the judgment relating to the Fund Transfer Fees, and judgment was handed down by the Court
of Appeal of England and Wales on February 15, 2019, in favor of HAL. As a result, we were awarded the Fund
Transfer Fees and related interest of approximately $5.0 million and $0.3 million, respectively. HAL will also be entitled
to certain costs relating to the appeal and the earlier trial insofar as they relate to the Fund Transfer Fees claim. On
November 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom refused the ex-employee’s application for permission to
appeal the Court of Appeal’s judgment. Accordingly, the Group recorded the award in its financial statements.
Eisenberg v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices, Halbert v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices, Qiu v. Credit Suisse
AG and Janus Indices and Y-GAR Capital v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices, and Rubinstein v. Credit Suisse Group
AG and Janus Indices
On March 15, 2018, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (“SDNY”) against Janus Index & Calculation Services LLC, which effective January 1, 2019, was renamed Janus
Henderson Indices LLC (“Janus Indices”), a subsidiary of JHG, on behalf of a class consisting of investors who
purchased VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Short-Term ETN (Ticker: XIV) between January 29, 2018, and February
5, 2018 (Eisenberg v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices). Credit Suisse, the issuer of the XIV notes, is also named as a
defendant in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs generally allege statements by Credit Suisse and Janus Indices, including those in
the registration statement, were materially false and misleading based on its discussion of how the intraday indicative
value (“IIV”) is calculated and that the IIV was not an accurate gauge of the economic value of the notes. On April 17,
2018, a second lawsuit was filed against Janus Indices and Credit Suisse in the United States District Court of the
Northern District of Alabama by certain investors in XIV (Halbert v. Credit Suisse AG and Janus Indices). On May 4,
2018, a third lawsuit, styled as a class action on behalf of investors who purchased XIV between January 29, 2018, and
February 5, 2018, was filed against Janus Indices and Credit Suisse AG in the SDNY (Qiu v. Credit Suisse AG and
Janus Indices). The Halbert and Qiu allegations generally copy the allegations in the Eisenberg case.
On August 20, 2018, an amended complaint was filed in the Eisenberg and Qiu cases (which have been consolidated in
the SDNY under the name Set Capital LLC, et al. v. Credit Suisse AG, et al.), adding Janus Distributors LLC, doing
business as Janus Henderson Distributors, and Janus Henderson Group plc as parties, and adding allegations of market
manipulation by all of the defendants. The Janus Henderson and Credit Suisse defendants moved to dismiss the Set
Capital amended complaint, and on September 25, 2019, the court dismissed all claims against all defendants. The court
denied the plaintiffs’ request for an opportunity to further amend their complaint, and therefore dismissed the case in its
entirety. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The defendants in Halbert – Credit Suisse and Janus Indices – jointly moved to dismiss the amended complaint. On
August 22, 2019, the court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims. The court
dismissed all claims against Janus Indices – including all federal securities claims – other than a claim for negligent
misrepresentation. On September 26, 2019, Janus Indices filed its answer to the complaint. As of December 31, 2019,
the case remains in the discovery phase.
On February 4, 2019, a fourth lawsuit was filed against Janus Indices, Janus Distributors LLC, Janus Henderson Group
plc and various Credit Suisse persons in the SDNY (Rubinstein v. Credit Suisse Group AG, et al.). The suit was styled as
a class action and involved VelocityShares Daily Inverse VIX Medium-Term ETN (Ticker: ZIV), but otherwise
generally copied the allegations in the XIV cases described above. On August 20, 2019, an amended complaint was
filed, which eliminated each of the Janus Henderson entities as defendants, thus dismissing all claims against them.
On February 7, 2019, a fifth lawsuit was filed against Janus Indices, Janus Distributors LLC, Janus Henderson Group
plc, and Credit Suisse in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (“EDNY”) by certain
investors in XIV (Y-GAR Capital LLC v. Credit Suisse Group AG, et al.). The allegations in Y-GAR generally asserted
that the disclosures relating to XIV were false and misleading. On March 29, 2019, the plaintiff withdrew the suit from
the EDNY and re-filed it in the SDNY. The Janus Henderson and Credit Suisse defendants each moved to dismiss the
claims against them. On January 2, 2020, the court dismissed all claims against all defendants.
We believe that the remaining claims in these exchange-traded note lawsuits are without merit and are vigorously
defending these actions. As of December 31, 2019, we cannot reasonably estimate possible losses from the remaining
claims in the exchange-traded note lawsuits.
Note 20 — Related Party Transactions
Disclosures relating to equity method investments and our pension scheme can be found in Note 9 — Equity Method
Investments and Note 16 — Retirement Benefit Plans, respectively. Transactions between JHG and our controlled
subsidiaries have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
Certain managed funds are deemed to be related parties of JHG under the related party guidance. We earn fees from the
funds for which we act as investment manager and the balance sheet includes amount due from these managed funds.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, we recognized revenues of $1,870.1 million, $1,953.2
million and $1,473.5 million, respectively, from the funds we manage that are related parties and not consolidated, in our
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.
110
111
Table of Contents Table of Contents
The following table reflects amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets relating to fees receivable from managed
funds:
Accrued income
Accounts receivable
As of December 31
2018
2019
187.2
198.2 $
29.7
34.0
$
Dai-ichi is a significant shareholder of JHG. Investment management fees attributable to Dai-ichi separate accounts for
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, were $15.8 million and $14.9 million, respectively.
Seed investments held in managed funds are discussed in Note 5 – Consolidation.
Note 21 — Geographic Information
The following summary provides information concerning our principal geographic areas for the years ended and as of
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Operating revenues
U.S.
UK
Luxembourg
International
Total
Year ended December 31,
2018
2019
$ 1,353.0 $ 1,338.7 $
2017
818.1
669.0
280.9
50.3
$ 2,192.4 $ 2,306.4 $ 1,818.3
602.4
182.3
54.7
649.4
255.9
62.4
Operating revenues are attributed to countries based on the location in which revenues are earned.
Long-lived assets
UK
U.S.
Australia
Other
Total
$
As of December 31,
2018
2019
366.8
384.8 $
2,604.2
219.3
2.5
$ 3,173.3 $ 3,192.8
2,569.4
216.1
3.0
Long-lived assets include property, equipment, software and intangible assets. As of December 31, 2019, intangible
assets in the U.S, UK and Australia were $2,536.0 million, $337.5 million and $215.1 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2018, intangible assets in the U.S., UK and Australia were $2,580.8 million, $324.5 million and $218.0
million, respectively.
112
Table of Contents
Second
Fourth
2019
First
Third
quarter quarter quarter quarter Full year
$ 519.3 $ 535.9 $ 536.0 $ 601.2 $ 2,192.4
540.9
143.6
445.7
113.1
(18.1)
(1.0)
427.6
112.1
154.3
120.4
(8.4)
112.0
118.5
112.3
(2.9)
109.4
124.5
99.9
(5.8)
94.1
$
0.48 $
0.56 $
0.58 $
0.59 $
2.21
$
0.48 $
0.56 $
0.58 $
0.59 $
2.21
Fourth
Second
2018
First
Third
quarter quarter quarter quarter Full year
$ 587.7 $ 592.4 $ 581.2 $ 545.1 $ 2,306.4
649.8
148.3
499.6
105.1
24.2
6.1
523.8
111.2
150.0
100.8
6.0
106.8
175.3
130.5
10.1
140.6
176.2
163.2
2.0
165.2
$
0.82 $
0.70 $
0.55 $
0.54 $
2.62
$
0.82 $
0.70 $
0.55 $
0.54 $
2.61
The following table reflects amounts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets relating to fees receivable from managed
Note 22 — Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Total revenue
Operating income
Net income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to JHG
Basic earnings per share attributable to JHG common
shareholders
Diluted earnings per share attributable to JHG common
shareholders
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Total revenue
Operating income
Net income
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to JHG
Basic earnings per share attributable to JHG common
shareholders
Diluted earnings per share attributable to JHG common
shareholders
funds:
Accrued income
Accounts receivable
As of December 31
2019
2018
$
198.2 $
187.2
34.0
29.7
Dai-ichi is a significant shareholder of JHG. Investment management fees attributable to Dai-ichi separate accounts for
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, were $15.8 million and $14.9 million, respectively.
Seed investments held in managed funds are discussed in Note 5 – Consolidation.
Note 21 — Geographic Information
The following summary provides information concerning our principal geographic areas for the years ended and as of
December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
Operating revenues are attributed to countries based on the location in which revenues are earned.
Operating revenues
U.S.
UK
Luxembourg
International
Total
Long-lived assets
UK
U.S.
Australia
Other
Total
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
$ 1,353.0 $ 1,338.7 $
602.4
182.3
54.7
649.4
255.9
62.4
2017
818.1
669.0
280.9
50.3
$ 2,192.4 $ 2,306.4 $ 1,818.3
As of December 31,
2019
2018
$
384.8 $
366.8
2,569.4
2,604.2
216.1
3.0
219.3
2.5
$ 3,173.3 $ 3,192.8
Long-lived assets include property, equipment, software and intangible assets. As of December 31, 2019, intangible
assets in the U.S, UK and Australia were $2,536.0 million, $337.5 million and $215.1 million, respectively. As of
December 31, 2018, intangible assets in the U.S., UK and Australia were $2,580.8 million, $324.5 million and $218.0
million, respectively.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2019, our management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Disclosure controls and procedures are
designed by us to ensure that we record, process, summarize and report within the time periods specified in the SEC’s
rule and forms the information we must disclose in reports that we file with or submit to the SEC. Richard M. Weil,
Chief Executive Officer, and Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and participated in management’s
evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, Mr. Weil and Mr. Thompson concluded
that as of the date of their evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and our registered public accounting firm’s
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, which contains its attestation on our internal control over
financial reporting, are incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
112
113
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2019, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10 of Part III of Form 10-K requires registrants to furnish the information required by the following items of
Regulations S-K, Part 400: Items 401 (Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons), 405 (Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act), 406 (Code of Ethics) and 407(c)(3) (Material Changes to Procedures for
Shareholder Nomination of Directors), (d)(4) (Names of audit committee members) and (d)(5) (Audit Committee
Financial Expert). Because we are a “foreign private issuer” as defined by Rule 3b-4 under the Securities Exchange of
1934, as amended, we are not required to comply with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we have not
provided the information called for in Item 405.
Directors
Kalpana Desai, Jeffrey Diermeier, Kevin Dolan, Eugene Flood Jr., Richard Gillingwater, Lawrence Kochard, Glenn
Schafer, Angela Seymour-Jackson, Tatsusaburo Yamamoto and Richard Weil are the current directors of JHG, holding
office until the 2020 annual general meeting or until their successors are elected and qualify. Ages shown below are as of
February 21, 2020.
Kalpana Desai | Age 52
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Ms. Desai was a Non-Executive Director of Henderson Group
from 2015 to May 2017 and is currently a member of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee and the Risk Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Desai was Head of Macquarie Capital Asia, the investment banking division of Macquarie Group Limited,
headquartered in Australia from 2009 to 2013. Before joining Macquarie, she was Head of the Asia Pacific Mergers &
Acquisitions Group and a Managing Director in the investment banking division of Bank of America Merrill Lynch in
Hong Kong from 2001 to 2009. Earlier in her career, Ms. Desai worked in the corporate finance divisions of Barclays de
Zoete Wedd in London and Hong Kong and at J. Henry Schroder Wagg in London and in the financial services division
of Coopers & Lybrand Consulting in London. She was a member of the Takeovers and Mergers Panel of the Securities
and Futures Commission in Hong Kong from 2007 to 2014. She also served as a Non-Executive Director of Canaccord
Genuity Group Inc., headquartered in Canada, from 2015 to 2019. Ms. Desai has a BSc in economics from the London
School of Economics and Political Science and qualified as a chartered accountant (ACA) at PricewaterhouseCoopers in
London in 1991.
Ms. Desai brings to the Board over 30 years of international advisory and investment banking experience, including
extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions and broad exposure to global business markets. In deciding to nominate
Ms. Desai, the Board also considered her experience and knowledge of risk management, compliance, accounting
standards and financial reporting rules and regulations, as well as her qualifications as a chartered accountant (ACA) and
an Audit Committee Financial Expert.
114
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Jeffrey Diermeier | Age 67
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2019, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Diermeier was an Independent Director of Janus Capital
Group from 2008 to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and the Risk Committee.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10 of Part III of Form 10-K requires registrants to furnish the information required by the following items of
Regulations S-K, Part 400: Items 401 (Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons), 405 (Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act), 406 (Code of Ethics) and 407(c)(3) (Material Changes to Procedures for
Shareholder Nomination of Directors), (d)(4) (Names of audit committee members) and (d)(5) (Audit Committee
Financial Expert). Because we are a “foreign private issuer” as defined by Rule 3b-4 under the Securities Exchange of
1934, as amended, we are not required to comply with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we have not
provided the information called for in Item 405.
Kalpana Desai, Jeffrey Diermeier, Kevin Dolan, Eugene Flood Jr., Richard Gillingwater, Lawrence Kochard, Glenn
Schafer, Angela Seymour-Jackson, Tatsusaburo Yamamoto and Richard Weil are the current directors of JHG, holding
office until the 2020 annual general meeting or until their successors are elected and qualify. Ages shown below are as of
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Ms. Desai was a Non-Executive Director of Henderson Group
from 2015 to May 2017 and is currently a member of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Directors
February 21, 2020.
Kalpana Desai | Age 52
Committee and the Risk Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Desai was Head of Macquarie Capital Asia, the investment banking division of Macquarie Group Limited,
headquartered in Australia from 2009 to 2013. Before joining Macquarie, she was Head of the Asia Pacific Mergers &
Acquisitions Group and a Managing Director in the investment banking division of Bank of America Merrill Lynch in
Hong Kong from 2001 to 2009. Earlier in her career, Ms. Desai worked in the corporate finance divisions of Barclays de
Zoete Wedd in London and Hong Kong and at J. Henry Schroder Wagg in London and in the financial services division
of Coopers & Lybrand Consulting in London. She was a member of the Takeovers and Mergers Panel of the Securities
and Futures Commission in Hong Kong from 2007 to 2014. She also served as a Non-Executive Director of Canaccord
Genuity Group Inc., headquartered in Canada, from 2015 to 2019. Ms. Desai has a BSc in economics from the London
School of Economics and Political Science and qualified as a chartered accountant (ACA) at PricewaterhouseCoopers in
London in 1991.
Ms. Desai brings to the Board over 30 years of international advisory and investment banking experience, including
extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions and broad exposure to global business markets. In deciding to nominate
Ms. Desai, the Board also considered her experience and knowledge of risk management, compliance, accounting
standards and financial reporting rules and regulations, as well as her qualifications as a chartered accountant (ACA) and
an Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Diermeier has served as a Director of the University of Wisconsin Foundation, a nonprofit fundraising and
endowment management organization, since 1998 and is a former Chairman of its Investment Committee. He has been a
Director of Adams Street Partners, a private equity firm located in Chicago, since 2011 and is also a minority owner of
Stairway Partners, LLC, a Chicago-based registered investment adviser, where he served as an advisory board member
from 2005 to 2012. From 2010 to September 2017, Mr. Diermeier was a co-owner and Chairman of L.B. White
Company, a heating equipment manufacturer. He was a Trustee of the Board of the Financial Accounting Foundation,
which oversees the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Government Accounting Standards Board, from 2009
to December 2015 and Chairman of the Trustees from 2012 to December 2015. From 2005 until 2009, he served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the CFA Institute, a nonprofit educational organization for investment
professionals in Charlottesville, Virginia. Earlier in his career, Mr. Diermeier served in a number of increasingly
responsible positions in the global asset management division of UBS and its predecessor organizations, primarily
Brinson Partners, Inc., beginning as an Equity Analyst and culminating as its Global Chief Investment Officer from 2000
to 2004. Mr. Diermeier holds the chartered financial analyst designation. He received his BBA and his MBA in Finance
and Investments from the University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Mr. Diermeier brings to the Board a wealth of expertise related to accounting standards, financial analysis, financial
reporting and corporate governance standards, and business management, as well as a deep understanding of the
investment management business gained through his many years of experience in the mutual fund and asset management
industry. In deciding to nominate Mr. Diermeier, the Board also considered his qualification as an Audit Committee
Financial Expert.
Kevin Dolan | Age 66
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Dolan was a Non-Executive Director of Henderson Group
from 2011 to May 2017 and is currently a member of the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee and the Risk Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Dolan has been in the financial services industry for 36 years and has held a number of senior executive positions,
including as Chief Executive of La Fayette Investment Management in London from 2007 to 2009, Chief Executive of
the Asset Management Division of Bank of Ireland Group from 2004 to 2007, and Chief Executive of Edmond de
Rothschild Asset Management from 2001 to 2004. Earlier in his career, he spent 9 years with the AXA Group where he
was Chief Executive Officer of AXA Investment Managers Paris, and Global Deputy Chief Executive Officer of AXA
Investment Management. Mr. Dolan was a Director of Meeschaert Gestion Privée until 2015, is the founding partner of
Anafin LLC, and is a senior advisor to One Peak Partners. Mr. Dolan received his BS in business administration from
Georgetown University.
Mr. Dolan brings to the Board demonstrated strategic, financial, accounting, regulatory, business management, corporate
finance and industry expertise gained through his many years of experience in senior executive roles, including as the
former Chief Executive Officer of three investment management firms. He also has extensive experience in
transformational corporate transactions, including mergers and acquisitions in Europe and the U.S.
114
115
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Eugene Flood Jr. | Age 64
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Flood was an Independent Director of Janus Capital Group
from 2014 to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the Risk Committee and a member of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and the Audit Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Flood was Executive Vice President of TIAA CREF from 2011 until his retirement in 2012, serving on the CREF
Board of Trustees and the TIAA CREF Mutual Fund Board of Trustees for seven years, and chairing the Investment
Committee. Prior to joining TIAA CREF as an executive in 2011, Mr. Flood spent 12 years with Smith Breeden
Associates, a North Carolina based fixed income asset manager, as President and Chief Executive Officer. Earlier in his
career, Mr. Flood held a range of trading and investment positions with Morgan Stanley from 1987 to 1999 and was an
Assistant Professor of Finance at Stanford Business School from 1982 to 1987. He has served as Chairman of the
advisory board for the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina Chapel
Hill since 2014, as a Trustee of the Financial Accounting Foundation since January 2016, and as a Director of the
Research Corporation for Science Advancement since March 2015. Previously, he served as a Director of The
Foundation for the Carolinas from 2012 to December 2015. Mr. Flood received his Bachelor of Arts degree in
economics from Harvard University and his PhD in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mr. Flood brings to the Board extensive investment management, mutual fund, investment adviser and financial
expertise gained through his more than 30 years of experience in the asset management industry. In deciding to nominate
Mr. Flood, the Board also considered his academic background in economics, which enables him to provide valuable
insights on economic trends, business strategy, global markets, and financial matters.
Richard Gillingwater | Age 63
Non-Executive Director and Chairman since May 2017. Mr. Gillingwater was a Non-Executive Director and Chairman
of the Henderson Group Board from 2013 to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Gillingwater retired as Chairman of European Investment banking at Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB) in 2003.
Previously, he held a variety of executive roles, including Head of Corporate Finance at Barclays de Zoete Wedd
(BZW), the investment banking arm of Barclays Bank Plc which was acquired by CSFB in 1998. He started his career in
investment banking in 1980 at Kleinwort Benson, where he spent ten years. In 2003, Mr. Gillingwater was asked by the
UK government to found and become the Chief Executive, and later Chairman, of the Shareholder Executive, an arm of
the UK government responsible for managing the government's financial interest in a range of state-owned businesses
for commercial rather than political interests. He also served as Dean of Cass Business School from 2007 to 2012. Mr.
Gillingwater currently serves as Chairman of SSE plc, a publicly listed energy company based in Scotland, and as a
Senior Independent Director of Whitbread plc, a UK-based multinational hotel and restaurant company. He is also a
Governor of the Wellcome Trust, an international medical charity. Mr. Gillingwater has served as a Director on a
number of other corporate boards, including as Chairman of CDC Group plc and as a Non-Executive Director of P&O,
Debenhams, Tomkins, Qinetiq Group, Kidde, Hiscox Ltd, Helical plc and Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc. Mr.
Gillingwater received his MA in law from St Edmund Hall, Oxford University and his MBA from the International
Institute for Management Development (IMD) in Lausanne, Switzerland, and he is a qualified solicitor.
Mr. Gillingwater brings to the Board demonstrated investment management, financial, regulatory, strategic, and business
management experience gained though his many years in senior executive roles in the investment banking industry. In
addition, he has substantial corporate governance expertise due to his extensive experience serving on the boards of a
number of other high-profile publicly listed companies.
116
Table of Contents
Eugene Flood Jr. | Age 64
Lawrence Kochard | Age 63
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Flood was an Independent Director of Janus Capital Group
from 2014 to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the Risk Committee and a member of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and the Audit Committee.
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Kochard was an Independent Director of Janus Capital Group
from 2008 to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Flood was Executive Vice President of TIAA CREF from 2011 until his retirement in 2012, serving on the CREF
Board of Trustees and the TIAA CREF Mutual Fund Board of Trustees for seven years, and chairing the Investment
Committee. Prior to joining TIAA CREF as an executive in 2011, Mr. Flood spent 12 years with Smith Breeden
Associates, a North Carolina based fixed income asset manager, as President and Chief Executive Officer. Earlier in his
career, Mr. Flood held a range of trading and investment positions with Morgan Stanley from 1987 to 1999 and was an
Assistant Professor of Finance at Stanford Business School from 1982 to 1987. He has served as Chairman of the
advisory board for the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina Chapel
Hill since 2014, as a Trustee of the Financial Accounting Foundation since January 2016, and as a Director of the
Research Corporation for Science Advancement since March 2015. Previously, he served as a Director of The
Foundation for the Carolinas from 2012 to December 2015. Mr. Flood received his Bachelor of Arts degree in
economics from Harvard University and his PhD in economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mr. Flood brings to the Board extensive investment management, mutual fund, investment adviser and financial
expertise gained through his more than 30 years of experience in the asset management industry. In deciding to nominate
Mr. Flood, the Board also considered his academic background in economics, which enables him to provide valuable
insights on economic trends, business strategy, global markets, and financial matters.
Richard Gillingwater | Age 63
Experience and Qualifications
Non-Executive Director and Chairman since May 2017. Mr. Gillingwater was a Non-Executive Director and Chairman
of the Henderson Group Board from 2013 to May 2017 and is currently the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee.
Mr. Gillingwater retired as Chairman of European Investment banking at Credit Suisse First Boston (CSFB) in 2003.
Previously, he held a variety of executive roles, including Head of Corporate Finance at Barclays de Zoete Wedd
(BZW), the investment banking arm of Barclays Bank Plc which was acquired by CSFB in 1998. He started his career in
investment banking in 1980 at Kleinwort Benson, where he spent ten years. In 2003, Mr. Gillingwater was asked by the
UK government to found and become the Chief Executive, and later Chairman, of the Shareholder Executive, an arm of
the UK government responsible for managing the government's financial interest in a range of state-owned businesses
for commercial rather than political interests. He also served as Dean of Cass Business School from 2007 to 2012. Mr.
Gillingwater currently serves as Chairman of SSE plc, a publicly listed energy company based in Scotland, and as a
Senior Independent Director of Whitbread plc, a UK-based multinational hotel and restaurant company. He is also a
Governor of the Wellcome Trust, an international medical charity. Mr. Gillingwater has served as a Director on a
number of other corporate boards, including as Chairman of CDC Group plc and as a Non-Executive Director of P&O,
Debenhams, Tomkins, Qinetiq Group, Kidde, Hiscox Ltd, Helical plc and Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc. Mr.
Gillingwater received his MA in law from St Edmund Hall, Oxford University and his MBA from the International
Institute for Management Development (IMD) in Lausanne, Switzerland, and he is a qualified solicitor.
Mr. Gillingwater brings to the Board demonstrated investment management, financial, regulatory, strategic, and business
management experience gained though his many years in senior executive roles in the investment banking industry. In
addition, he has substantial corporate governance expertise due to his extensive experience serving on the boards of a
number of other high-profile publicly listed companies.
Mr. Kochard is Chief Investment Officer at Makena Capital Management. From 2011 to December 2017, he was the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of the University of Virginia Investment Management Company.
Mr. Kochard has served as a Director of the Virginia Commonwealth University Investment Management Company
since 2015, as a Director and the Chair of the Investment Committee for the Virginia Environmental Endowment since
2013, and as a member of the Investment Advisory Committee of the Virginia Retirement System since 2011, serving as
Chair since 2017. He previously served as the Chairman of the College of William & Mary Investment Committee from
2005 to 2011. From 2004 to 2010, he was the Chief Investment Officer of Georgetown University, and from 2001 to
2004 he was Managing Director of Equity and Hedge Fund Investments of the Virginia Retirement System. Mr. Kochard
worked as an Assistant Professor of Finance at the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia from
1999 to 2001. He started his career in financial analysis and planning, corporate finance and capital markets for E.I.
DuPont de Nemours and Company, Fannie Mae and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Mr. Kochard holds the chartered
financial analyst designation and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Virginia.
Mr. Kochard brings to the Board a wealth of experience in investment management, investment adviser oversight, and
general executive management gained through his many years serving in senior executive roles in the asset management
industry. In deciding to nominate Mr. Kochard, the Board also considered his academic background in economics, which
enables him to provide valuable insights on economic trends, strategy, global markets, and financial matters.
Glenn Schafer | Age 70
Vice Chairman and Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Schafer was an Independent Director of
Janus Capital Group from 2007 to May 2017 and served as Chairman from 2012 to May 2017. He is a member of the
Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Schafer retired as President of Pacific Life Insurance Company (Pacific Life) in 2005, having served in that role
since 1995. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Life from 1991 to
1995, and he was a member of the Pacific Life Board of Directors from 1995 to 2005. He currently serves as a Director
of GeoOptics LLC, a weather satellite manufacturer. Over the course of his career, Mr. Schafer has served as a Director
on a number of other corporate boards, including Scottish Re Group, a reinsurer of life insurance, annuities and other
annuity-type products, Genesis Healthcare, Inc., a provider of short-term post-acute, rehabilitation, skilled nursing and
long-term care services, and Mercury General Corporation, an insurance holding company. Mr. Schafer received his BS
from Michigan State University and his MBA from the University of Detroit.
Mr. Schafer brings to the Board extensive experience in accounting and financial matters, investment and capital
management, corporate governance and oversight, business management, strategy and operations, as well as a deep
understanding of the insurance industry and financial products gained through his many years in senior executive roles
with Pacific Life.
Angela Seymour-Jackson | Age 53
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Ms. Seymour-Jackson was a Non-Executive Director of
Henderson Group from 2014 to May 2017 and is currently a member of the Compensation Committee and the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. She also chairs Henderson Global Holdings Asset Management
Limited (a holding company of the legacy Henderson Group).
116
117
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Seymour-Jackson has over 25 years of experience in retail financial services. Over the course of her career, she has
held various senior marketing and distribution roles with Norwich Union Insurance, General Accident Insurance, CGU
plc and Aviva plc. She was Chief Executive Officer of RAC Motoring Services Limited from 2010 until 2012. She
joined Aegon UK in May 2012 and was appointed Managing Director of the Workplace Solutions Division in December
2012. Ms. Seymour-Jackson was a Senior Advisor to Lloyds Banking Group (insurance) until October 2017. She is a
Non-Executive Director of Rentokil Initial plc and Page Group plc and serves as Deputy Chair and Senior Independent
Director at Gocompare.com Group plc. Ms. Seymour-Jackson has a BA (Hons) in French and European studies from the
University of East Anglia, a diploma from the Chartered Institute of Marketing and an MSc in marketing.
Ms. Seymour-Jackson brings to the Board substantial expertise in retail financial services, risk management, regulatory
matters, mergers and acquisitions, and business management gained through her many years in various senior marketing
and distribution roles at large multinational insurance companies.
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto | Age 55
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Yamamoto was an Independent Director of Janus Capital
Group from July 2015 to May 2017 and is currently a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Experience and Qualifications
Mr. Yamamoto has served as Managing Executive Officer, Corporate Planning Unit, of Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.
(Dai-ichi Life) since April 2017. Previously, he was Executive Officer and General Manager, Investment Planning
Department, of Dai-ichi Life from April 2015 to April 2017 and General Manager, Investment Planning Department, of
Dai-ichi from 2014 to April 2015. Earlier in his 30-year career with Dai-ichi Life, he held a variety of increasingly
responsible roles, including as Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Dai-ichi Life Insurance Vietnam and Managing
Director of Dai-ichi Life Insurance (Asia Pacific). Pursuant to the Investment and Strategic Cooperation Agreement (the
Agreement) between Dai-ichi Life and JHG, Dai-ichi Life has the right to designate a representative for appointment to
the JHG’s Board. Mr. Yamamoto was appointed to the Board after Dai-ichi Life designated him as its representative. In
connection with the Agreement, Mr. Yamamoto has worked with JHG’s management as a member of the strategic
alliance coordination committee to further the goals of the strategic alliance and enhance product distribution
opportunities. Mr. Yamamoto received his Bachelor of Arts in economics from WASEDA University.
Mr. Yamamoto brings to the Board significant exposure to global markets and extensive knowledge of the financial
services industry outside of the U.S. gained through his many years in senior executive roles with Dai-ichi Life. He also
has substantial business management experience from his roles in the international investment planning and asset
management business of Dai-ichi Life.
Richard Weil | Age 56
Chief Executive Officer since August 1, 2018 (co-Chief Executive Officer since May 2017), and Executive Director
since May 2017. Mr. Weil served as Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Janus Capital Group from 2010 to May
2017.
Experience and Qualifications
Since August 2018, Mr. Weil has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board. In his role, he
leads our executive committee and is responsible for the strategic direction and overall day-to-day management of JHG.
Previously, he was Co-CEO of JHG following the merger of Janus Capital Group (Janus) and Henderson Global
Investors in May 2017. Prior to the merger, Mr. Weil was the Chief Executive Officer of Janus, a position he had held
since 2010. Before joining Janus, he spent 15 years in a variety of senior executive roles with PIMCO, including Global
Head of PIMCO Advisory, a member of PIMCO’s executive committee, and a member of the board of trustees of the
PIMCO Funds. Mr. Weil also served as Chief Operating Officer of PIMCO for 10 years, where he successfully led the
118
Table of Contents Experience and Qualifications
Ms. Seymour-Jackson has over 25 years of experience in retail financial services. Over the course of her career, she has
held various senior marketing and distribution roles with Norwich Union Insurance, General Accident Insurance, CGU
plc and Aviva plc. She was Chief Executive Officer of RAC Motoring Services Limited from 2010 until 2012. She
joined Aegon UK in May 2012 and was appointed Managing Director of the Workplace Solutions Division in December
2012. Ms. Seymour-Jackson was a Senior Advisor to Lloyds Banking Group (insurance) until October 2017. She is a
Non-Executive Director of Rentokil Initial plc and Page Group plc and serves as Deputy Chair and Senior Independent
Director at Gocompare.com Group plc. Ms. Seymour-Jackson has a BA (Hons) in French and European studies from the
University of East Anglia, a diploma from the Chartered Institute of Marketing and an MSc in marketing.
development of PIMCO’s global business and founded its German operations, and as General Counsel to PIMCO
Advisors L.P. Before joining PIMCO in 1996, Mr. Weil was with Bankers Trust Global Asset Management and Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP in New York. Mr. Weil received his Bachelor of Arts in economics from Duke University and
his Juris Doctorate from the University of Chicago Law School. He has over 24 years of financial industry experience.
Mr. Weil brings to the Board exceptional leadership skills and unique perspective and insight that come from managing
JHG’s business on a day-to-day basis. His deep understanding of our business, markets, operations and strategy enable
him to keep the Board apprised of the most significant developments impacting JHG and to guide the Board’s discussion
and review of our strategy. In addition, he brings extensive business, management and legal experience gained through
his many years in senior executive roles in the investment management industry.
Ms. Seymour-Jackson brings to the Board substantial expertise in retail financial services, risk management, regulatory
matters, mergers and acquisitions, and business management gained through her many years in various senior marketing
and distribution roles at large multinational insurance companies.
Executive Officers
Our current executive officers are as follows:
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto | Age 55
Experience and Qualifications
Independent Non-Executive Director since May 2017. Mr. Yamamoto was an Independent Director of Janus Capital
Group from July 2015 to May 2017 and is currently a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Mr. Yamamoto has served as Managing Executive Officer, Corporate Planning Unit, of Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.
(Dai-ichi Life) since April 2017. Previously, he was Executive Officer and General Manager, Investment Planning
Department, of Dai-ichi Life from April 2015 to April 2017 and General Manager, Investment Planning Department, of
Dai-ichi from 2014 to April 2015. Earlier in his 30-year career with Dai-ichi Life, he held a variety of increasingly
responsible roles, including as Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Dai-ichi Life Insurance Vietnam and Managing
Director of Dai-ichi Life Insurance (Asia Pacific). Pursuant to the Investment and Strategic Cooperation Agreement (the
Agreement) between Dai-ichi Life and JHG, Dai-ichi Life has the right to designate a representative for appointment to
the JHG’s Board. Mr. Yamamoto was appointed to the Board after Dai-ichi Life designated him as its representative. In
connection with the Agreement, Mr. Yamamoto has worked with JHG’s management as a member of the strategic
alliance coordination committee to further the goals of the strategic alliance and enhance product distribution
opportunities. Mr. Yamamoto received his Bachelor of Arts in economics from WASEDA University.
Mr. Yamamoto brings to the Board significant exposure to global markets and extensive knowledge of the financial
services industry outside of the U.S. gained through his many years in senior executive roles with Dai-ichi Life. He also
has substantial business management experience from his roles in the international investment planning and asset
management business of Dai-ichi Life.
Richard Weil | Age 56
2017.
Experience and Qualifications
Chief Executive Officer since August 1, 2018 (co-Chief Executive Officer since May 2017), and Executive Director
since May 2017. Mr. Weil served as Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Janus Capital Group from 2010 to May
Since August 2018, Mr. Weil has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board. In his role, he
leads our executive committee and is responsible for the strategic direction and overall day-to-day management of JHG.
Previously, he was Co-CEO of JHG following the merger of Janus Capital Group (Janus) and Henderson Global
Investors in May 2017. Prior to the merger, Mr. Weil was the Chief Executive Officer of Janus, a position he had held
since 2010. Before joining Janus, he spent 15 years in a variety of senior executive roles with PIMCO, including Global
Head of PIMCO Advisory, a member of PIMCO’s executive committee, and a member of the board of trustees of the
PIMCO Funds. Mr. Weil also served as Chief Operating Officer of PIMCO for 10 years, where he successfully led the
Name
Richard Weil
Roger Thompson
Enrique Chang
Bruce Koepfgen
Suzanne Cain
Title
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Global Chief Investment Officer
Head of North America
Global Head of Distribution
The principal occupation of our current executive officers is shown in the table above supplemented by the following
information, except with respect to Mr. Weil, whose previous experience is described above together with the experience
of our other directors. Ages shown below are as of February 21, 2020.
Roger Thompson | Age 52
Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Thompson has served as our Chief Financial Officer and as a member of our executive committee since May 2017.
Before the merger of Janus Capital Group and Henderson Global Investors, he was Chief Financial Officer of Henderson
from 2013 to May 2017. Mr. Thompson joined Henderson from J.P. Morgan Asset Management where he held various
positions of increasing responsibility from 1993 to 2013, including Global Chief Operating Officer, Head of UK, and
International Chief Financial Officer. Earlier in his career, Mr. Thompson served in a broad range of roles at J.P. Morgan
in Tokyo, Singapore and Hong Kong. He trained as an accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Mr. Thompson earned his Bachelor of Arts in accountancy and economics from Exeter University. He is a chartered
accountant and has over 27 years of financial industry experience.
Enrique Chang | Age 57
Global Chief Investment Officer
Since May 2017, Mr. Chang has served as our Global Chief Investment Officer and as a member of our executive
committee. In his current role, he leads our global investment team and is also a Portfolio Manager on Janus Henderson
Global Allocation strategies. Previously, he was President, Head of Investments at Janus Capital Group from March
2016 to May 2017. Before joining Janus, Mr. Chang served as Chief Investment Officer and Executive Vice President
of American Century Investments from 2007 to 2013, where he was a member of the firm’s asset allocation committee
and investment management senior leadership team and served on American Century’s board of directors. Before
American Century, Mr. Chang served as President and Chief Investment Officer of Munder Capital Management. Earlier
in his career, he held various senior investment management positions at Vantage Global Advisor, J&W Seligman and
Co., and General Reinsurance Corp.
118
119
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Mr. Chang earned his Bachelor of Arts in mathematics from Fairleigh Dickinson University, and his MBA in
finance/quantitative analysis and MS in statistics and operations research from New York University. He has over 31
years of financial industry experience.
Bruce Koepfgen | Age 67
Head of North America
Bruce Koepfgen has served as our Executive Vice President, Head of North America and as a member of our executive
committee since May 2017. In his current role, he works with senior leaders to advance the interests of the firm’s clients,
shareholders and employees. He is also President and Chief Executive Officer of Janus Investment Fund, Janus Aspen
Series, Janus Detroit Street Trust and Clayton Street Trust and is a member of the Board of Directors of Intech and the
Board of Managers of Perkins Investment Management LLC, both of which are subsidiaries of JHG. Previously, Mr.
Koepfgen served as President of Janus Capital Group from 2013 to May 2017 and as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer from 2011 to 2013. Prior to joining Janus, Mr. Koepfgen held various senior leadership roles with
Allianz Global Investors and Oppenheimer Capital, including CEO of Oppenheimer Capital from 2003 to 2009, Co-CEO
of Allianz Global Investors Management Partners from 2008 to 2009, and Chairman of Allianz Global Investors Fund
Management from 2004 to 2009. Earlier in his career, he served as President and Principal of Koepfgen Company LLC,
a management consulting organization, from 1999 to 2003, and as a Managing Director of Salomon Brothers Inc., where
he held various positions from 1976 to 1999.
Mr. Koepfgen earned his Bachelor of Science in business administration from the University of Michigan and his MBA
from Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management. He has over 44 years of financial industry experience.
Suzanne Cain | Age 56
Global Head of Distribution
Suzanne Cain has served as our Global Head of Distribution and as a member of our executive committee since May
2019. In her current role, she is responsible for global sales and product marketing for both institutional and retail
channels and oversees our global marketing and client service worldwide. Prior to joining Janus Henderson, she was
U.S. and Global Head of Institutional Clients of Blackrock iShares, the largest provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
worldwide, from May 2017 to May 2019, where she led the firm’s global client teams across sales, product consulting,
portfolio construction and global markets coverage. Before joining Blackrock iShares, Ms. Cain served as Head of the
Institutional Client Group for Fixed Income and Head of Credit and Structured Finance Sales for EMEA at Deutsche
Bank from 2010 to May 2017. Earlier in her career, she served in a variety of increasingly responsible positions at
Morgan Stanley in London, including Head of Credit Sales for EMEA and leadership roles in Morgan Stanley’s
UK/Ireland fixed income capital markets and treasury solutions group and in structured finance origination for Western
Europe. Ms. Cain began her career at Salomon Brothers in New York in 1985, focusing on hedge management and fixed
income derivatives.
Ms. Cain received her Bachelor of Science in business analysis from Indiana University. She has over 30 years of
financial industry experience.
Officer Code of Ethics
Our Officer Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers (including our CEO, Chief Financial Officer, and
Chief Accounting Officer) (the “Officer Code”) is available on our website at http://www.janushenderson.com/group
under “Governance Policies and Statements.” Any amendments to or waivers of the Officer Code will be disclosed on
our website in the same location.
Director Nomination Process and Diversity
We believe that in order for the Board to effectively guide JHG to sustained, long-term success, it must be composed of
individuals with sophistication and experience in the many disciplines that strengthen our business. We sell our products
to intermediary, institutional and self-directed clients. To best serve these clients and our shareholders, we seek to ensure
120
Table of Contents Mr. Chang earned his Bachelor of Arts in mathematics from Fairleigh Dickinson University, and his MBA in
finance/quantitative analysis and MS in statistics and operations research from New York University. He has over 31
years of financial industry experience.
Bruce Koepfgen | Age 67
Head of North America
Bruce Koepfgen has served as our Executive Vice President, Head of North America and as a member of our executive
committee since May 2017. In his current role, he works with senior leaders to advance the interests of the firm’s clients,
shareholders and employees. He is also President and Chief Executive Officer of Janus Investment Fund, Janus Aspen
Series, Janus Detroit Street Trust and Clayton Street Trust and is a member of the Board of Directors of Intech and the
Board of Managers of Perkins Investment Management LLC, both of which are subsidiaries of JHG. Previously, Mr.
Koepfgen served as President of Janus Capital Group from 2013 to May 2017 and as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer from 2011 to 2013. Prior to joining Janus, Mr. Koepfgen held various senior leadership roles with
Allianz Global Investors and Oppenheimer Capital, including CEO of Oppenheimer Capital from 2003 to 2009, Co-CEO
of Allianz Global Investors Management Partners from 2008 to 2009, and Chairman of Allianz Global Investors Fund
Management from 2004 to 2009. Earlier in his career, he served as President and Principal of Koepfgen Company LLC,
a management consulting organization, from 1999 to 2003, and as a Managing Director of Salomon Brothers Inc., where
he held various positions from 1976 to 1999.
Mr. Koepfgen earned his Bachelor of Science in business administration from the University of Michigan and his MBA
from Northwestern University, Kellogg School of Management. He has over 44 years of financial industry experience.
Suzanne Cain | Age 56
Global Head of Distribution
Suzanne Cain has served as our Global Head of Distribution and as a member of our executive committee since May
2019. In her current role, she is responsible for global sales and product marketing for both institutional and retail
channels and oversees our global marketing and client service worldwide. Prior to joining Janus Henderson, she was
U.S. and Global Head of Institutional Clients of Blackrock iShares, the largest provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
worldwide, from May 2017 to May 2019, where she led the firm’s global client teams across sales, product consulting,
portfolio construction and global markets coverage. Before joining Blackrock iShares, Ms. Cain served as Head of the
Institutional Client Group for Fixed Income and Head of Credit and Structured Finance Sales for EMEA at Deutsche
Bank from 2010 to May 2017. Earlier in her career, she served in a variety of increasingly responsible positions at
Morgan Stanley in London, including Head of Credit Sales for EMEA and leadership roles in Morgan Stanley’s
UK/Ireland fixed income capital markets and treasury solutions group and in structured finance origination for Western
Europe. Ms. Cain began her career at Salomon Brothers in New York in 1985, focusing on hedge management and fixed
Ms. Cain received her Bachelor of Science in business analysis from Indiana University. She has over 30 years of
income derivatives.
financial industry experience.
Officer Code of Ethics
Our Officer Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers (including our CEO, Chief Financial Officer, and
Chief Accounting Officer) (the “Officer Code”) is available on our website at http://www.janushenderson.com/group
under “Governance Policies and Statements.” Any amendments to or waivers of the Officer Code will be disclosed on
our website in the same location.
Director Nomination Process and Diversity
We believe that in order for the Board to effectively guide JHG to sustained, long-term success, it must be composed of
individuals with sophistication and experience in the many disciplines that strengthen our business. We sell our products
to intermediary, institutional and self-directed clients. To best serve these clients and our shareholders, we seek to ensure
that the Board consists of directors who are highly sophisticated in, among other disciplines, domestic and international
investment and asset management, finance, economic policy, and the legal and accounting regulations that impact our
business. We also believe that the Board should include directors with experience managing, overseeing or advising
comparable companies in our industry at the chief executive officer and/or the director level.
The Board has delegated the process for screening potential director candidates to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee (“Nominating Committee”). When the Nominating Committee determines that it is desirable to
add a director or fill a vacancy on the Board, it will identify one or more qualified individuals and recommend them to
the Board. In identifying qualified individuals, the Nominating Committee generally engages a search firm for this
purpose. In evaluating candidates for potential membership on the Board, the Nominating Committee ensures that each
director nominee satisfies at least the criteria set forth in our Governance Guidelines and considers and evaluates the
director nominee’s individual background and qualifications and the extent to which such background and qualifications
might benefit JHG based on the size and composition of the Board of Directors at the time. In identifying director
nominees, the Nominating Committee will seek talented and experienced candidates with professional backgrounds who
support a balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and diversity appropriate for the Board as a whole.
The Board believes that it is currently constituted by members that collectively possess diverse knowledge and
experience in the disciplines that strengthen our business. Prior to nominating a new director candidate, the Nominating
Committee will consider the collective experience of the existing Board members and based on that evaluation, the
Nominating Committee nominates individuals whom it believes possess experience and expertise that will enhance the
Board’s ability to serve our shareholders. Although the Board does not currently have a policy specifically addressing
director diversity, the Nominating Committee is expected to assess and consider the diversity of the Board and the
effectiveness of its diversity prior to nominating any additional Board candidates.
Corporate Governance
The Board has established corporate governance measures substantially in compliance with requirements of the NYSE.
These include Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters for the Board’s Audit Committee, Risk Committee,
Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, and a Code of Conduct that applies to all
directors, officers and employees. Each of these documents is published on our corporate website at
http://www.janushenderson.com/group.
Because we are a foreign private issuer as defined in SEC rules, we are not required to comply with all NYSE corporate
governance requirements as they apply to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE. Our corporate governance
practices, however, do not differ in any significant way from those requirements, except with respect to equity
compensation plans. Whereas the NYSE rules, with limited exceptions, require that shareholders be given the
opportunity to vote on equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, relevant ASX rules provide that
individual grants under those plans do not require shareholder approval unless they involve the issue of securities to a
related party of the issuer (such as a director) or a person whose relationship with the company or a related party is such
that ASX considers that approval should be obtained. Our corporate governance practices comply with applicable
requirements of the SEC.
Audit Committee
The members of our Audit Committee are Jeffrey Diermeier (Chair), Kalpana Desai, Kevin Dolan and Eugene Flood Jr.,
each of whom is independent under the standards established by the Board and the NYSE.
Audit Committee Financial Experts
Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the accounting or related financial
management expertise requirements of the NYSE and that Jeffrey Diermeier and Kalpana Desai qualify as “audit
Committee financial experts” under applicable SEC regulations. No member of the Audit Committee serves on an audit
committee of more than two public companies in addition to JHG.
120
121
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Because we are a foreign private issuer, we are responding to this Item 11 as permitted by Item 402(a)-(1) of SEC
Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. This section discusses material information relating to our executive
compensation program and plans for our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”):
● Suzanne Cain
Global Head of Distribution
● Bruce Koepfgen
Head of North America
● Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer
● Roger Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
● Enrique Chang
Global Chief Investment Officer
Compensation Principles
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for the oversight of our executive compensation program, including the
review and approval of goals and objectives relevant to our CEO’s performance assessment and compensation decisions,
and approval of the compensation of our executive officers based on an evaluation of each executive’s performance. Our
executive compensation program is based on the following principles:
• Attract and retain individuals critical to our long-term success by providing total reward opportunities which,
subject to performance, are competitive within our defined markets;
• Fully align pay with our strategic priorities, reinforce a strong performance culture through rewards that reflect
company-wide, department, team, and individual performance;
• Align management, client and shareholder interests by deferring a significant portion of compensation into JHG
stock awards and/or fund units;
• Manage risk-taking and conflicts of interest in our incentive plans, maintaining an appropriate balance between base
salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term deferred incentives; and
• Ensure that compensation processes and procedures comply with regulatory requirements and legislation, are
consistent with market practice, and include effective risk management controls.
Elements of Compensation
We strive to maintain an appropriate balance between base salary and variable compensation without targeting a specific
mix or ratio in the compensation framework for the CEO and the other NEOs. However, once the CEO’s variable
compensation is determined, the mix of cash and deferral, as well as the mix of deferred awards, is fixed.
Base salary constitutes a relatively small portion of our executives’ total compensation, something that reflects our
compensation principles and the Compensation Committee’s belief that the majority of compensation should be
performance-based.
122
Table of Contents
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Because we are a foreign private issuer, we are responding to this Item 11 as permitted by Item 402(a)-(1) of SEC
Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. This section discusses material information relating to our executive
compensation program and plans for our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”):
● Suzanne Cain
Global Head of Distribution
● Bruce Koepfgen
Head of North America
● Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer
● Roger Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
● Enrique Chang
Global Chief Investment Officer
Compensation Principles
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for the oversight of our executive compensation program, including the
review and approval of goals and objectives relevant to our CEO’s performance assessment and compensation decisions,
and approval of the compensation of our executive officers based on an evaluation of each executive’s performance. Our
executive compensation program is based on the following principles:
subject to performance, are competitive within our defined markets;
• Fully align pay with our strategic priorities, reinforce a strong performance culture through rewards that reflect
company-wide, department, team, and individual performance;
• Align management, client and shareholder interests by deferring a significant portion of compensation into JHG
stock awards and/or fund units;
• Manage risk-taking and conflicts of interest in our incentive plans, maintaining an appropriate balance between base
salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term deferred incentives; and
• Ensure that compensation processes and procedures comply with regulatory requirements and legislation, are
consistent with market practice, and include effective risk management controls.
Elements of Compensation
We strive to maintain an appropriate balance between base salary and variable compensation without targeting a specific
mix or ratio in the compensation framework for the CEO and the other NEOs. However, once the CEO’s variable
compensation is determined, the mix of cash and deferral, as well as the mix of deferred awards, is fixed.
Base salary constitutes a relatively small portion of our executives’ total compensation, something that reflects our
compensation principles and the Compensation Committee’s belief that the majority of compensation should be
performance-based.
• Attract and retain individuals critical to our long-term success by providing total reward opportunities which,
Variable Compensation
Base Salary
For 2019, base salary constituted 9% of our CEO’s total compensation and 10% of our other NEOs’ total compensation,
which is consistent with our philosophy that a substantial majority of executive compensation should be performance-
based. In establishing salary levels, the Committee typically considers competitive market pay levels and each executive
officer’s responsibilities, experience and performance.
Following a review of current base salaries, as compared to the JHG Peer Group (as defined below), the Committee did
not approve salary increases for the CEO or any of our NEOs going into 2020.
Our Compensation Committee emphasizes performance-based variable incentives as the primary element of
compensation paid to the CEO and our other NEOs, reinforcing our strong pay-for-performance culture. In 2019, 91% of
the CEO’s total compensation and 90% of the other NEOs’ total compensation (excluding one-time buyout awards) was
performance-based variable incentives. As shown in the charts above, a significant portion of variable compensation is
deferred into JHG stock awards and/or fund units, aligning management, client and shareholder interests, which is
consistent with our philosophy.
CEO Variable Compensation
For the CEO, we use a “scorecard” approach to evaluate performance and determine annual variable compensation. This
approach, described in more detail on page 125, combines numerous absolute and relative performance measures, which
are grouped into three categories: (i) investment excellence, (ii) financial results and (iii) strategic results.
Once the amount of the CEO’s variable compensation award is determined, 50% of the award is paid in cash and 50% is
deferred and delivered as shown below:
122
123
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Consistent with market practice for CEOs in the JHG Public Company Peer Group shown below (the “JHG Peer
Group”), the deferred portion of the CEO’s variable compensation award is delivered as follows:
● 50% in time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of JHG stock and/or fund units, which vest in three
equal installments over a three-year period; and
● 50% in performance stock units (PSUs), which cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date
subject to JHG’s three-year relative TSR ranking versus the JHG Peer Group. The potential payout for
the PSUs ranges from 0% to 200% of the number of units initially granted.
0% Payout
Target Payout
3-year relative TSR is at or below the 10th percentile ranking
3-year relative TSR is at the 50th percentile ranking
200% of Target Payout
3-year relative TSR is at or above the 90th percentile ranking
Notes:
Regardless of JHG’s relative TSR ranking, the award will be subject to a Maximum Value Cap not to exceed 400% of the initial grant
value.
Even if JHG’s three-year relative TSR exceeds the JHG Peer Group median, if JHG’s three-year absolute TSR is negative, payouts cannot
exceed 100% of the units initially granted.
The PSU vesting conditions subject the CEO’s variable compensation award to two performance hurdles:
●
●
Hurdle #1: To receive a variable compensation award each year, the CEO must first deliver results
against the performance measures as outlined in the scorecard; and
Hurdle #2: To fully vest the deferred PSU portion of the CEO’s variable compensation award, JHG’s
three-year relative TSR must meet or exceed the JHG Peer Group median.
Our Compensation Committee believes that by subjecting the deferred PSUs to this double hurdle, the CEO’s pay is
further aligned with shareholder interests over the long-term. As shown in the table below, the CEO’s 2015 and 2016
PSU grants actually vested, on average, 48% of the original units granted due to under-performance of our three-year
relative TSR as compared to the JHG Peer Group.
Notes:
The 2015 and 2016 awards were granted pre-Merger and vested based on the three-year relative TSR performance of the current Company.
2015 vested value as of December 31, 2018, based on the stock price of $20.72.
2016 vested value as of December 31, 2019, based on the stock price of $24.45.
Other NEO Variable Compensation
For our other NEOs, annual variable compensation awards are subject to our standard deferral methodology. A portion
of each officer’s award is paid in cash and the remainder is deferred 50% into JHG restricted stock units and 50% into
JHG fund units, which vest in equal installments over a three-year period. See LTI Awards Granted in Consideration of
2019 Performance on page 130 for more information regarding these awards.
124
Table of Contents
Consistent with market practice for CEOs in the JHG Public Company Peer Group shown below (the “JHG Peer
Group”), the deferred portion of the CEO’s variable compensation award is delivered as follows:
Delivery of Variable Compensation Through LTI Awards
● 50% in time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of JHG stock and/or fund units, which vest in three
equal installments over a three-year period; and
● 50% in performance stock units (PSUs), which cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date
subject to JHG’s three-year relative TSR ranking versus the JHG Peer Group. The potential payout for
the PSUs ranges from 0% to 200% of the number of units initially granted.
0% Payout
Target Payout
3-year relative TSR is at or below the 10th percentile ranking
3-year relative TSR is at the 50th percentile ranking
200% of Target Payout
3-year relative TSR is at or above the 90th percentile ranking
Regardless of JHG’s relative TSR ranking, the award will be subject to a Maximum Value Cap not to exceed 400% of the initial grant
Even if JHG’s three-year relative TSR exceeds the JHG Peer Group median, if JHG’s three-year absolute TSR is negative, payouts cannot
exceed 100% of the units initially granted.
The PSU vesting conditions subject the CEO’s variable compensation award to two performance hurdles:
Hurdle #1: To receive a variable compensation award each year, the CEO must first deliver results
against the performance measures as outlined in the scorecard; and
Hurdle #2: To fully vest the deferred PSU portion of the CEO’s variable compensation award, JHG’s
three-year relative TSR must meet or exceed the JHG Peer Group median.
Our Compensation Committee believes that by subjecting the deferred PSUs to this double hurdle, the CEO’s pay is
further aligned with shareholder interests over the long-term. As shown in the table below, the CEO’s 2015 and 2016
PSU grants actually vested, on average, 48% of the original units granted due to under-performance of our three-year
relative TSR as compared to the JHG Peer Group.
Notes:
value.
●
●
Notes:
The 2015 and 2016 awards were granted pre-Merger and vested based on the three-year relative TSR performance of the current Company.
2015 vested value as of December 31, 2018, based on the stock price of $20.72.
2016 vested value as of December 31, 2019, based on the stock price of $24.45.
Other NEO Variable Compensation
For our other NEOs, annual variable compensation awards are subject to our standard deferral methodology. A portion
of each officer’s award is paid in cash and the remainder is deferred 50% into JHG restricted stock units and 50% into
JHG fund units, which vest in equal installments over a three-year period. See LTI Awards Granted in Consideration of
2019 Performance on page 130 for more information regarding these awards.
JHG offers several types of long-term incentive (“LTI”) awards for purposes of delivering the deferred portion of NEO
variable compensation:
Restricted Stock
Awards (RSAs) and
Restricted Stock Units
(RSUs)
Restricted JHG Fund
Units (Funds)
Performance Stock
Units (PSUs)
A substantial portion of variable compensation is deferred into RSAs and RSUs on
an annual basis. These awards are typically subject to three-year vesting schedules.
Dividends are generally paid on unvested shares, and these are included in the
Summary of Total Compensation table on page 127.
Vesting of RSAs and RSUs may accelerate under certain circumstances, such as the
death or disability of the executive. Certain awards may contain a provision that
allows for the vesting schedule to be accelerated upon a termination following a
change in control.
A substantial portion of variable compensation is also deferred into restricted JHG
fund units. These awards typically vest in equal installments over a three-year
period.
Vesting of fund awards may accelerate under certain circumstances, such as the
death or disability of the executive. Certain awards may contain a provision that
allows for the vesting schedule to be accelerated upon a termination following a
change in control.
For the CEO, a portion of his variable compensation is deferred into PSUs. These
PSU awards are subject to additional vesting requirements based on a comparison
of our total shareholder return over the three-year deferral period to the total
shareholder return of the JHG Peer Group over the same period. Vesting of PSUs
may accelerate under certain circumstances, such as the death or disability of the
executive. The 2019 PSU award has a one-year holding period following vesting,
and dividends are not paid on unvested PSU awards.
The Scorecard Approach to CEO Compensation
The Compensation Committee uses a structured scorecard to measure the CEO’s performance. The scorecard approach
is designed to:
● Align CEO compensation with JHG performance; and
● Reward the CEO for achieving goals that maximize long-term value creation for our shareholders and clients.
The CEO’s 2019 scorecard was largely based on the same investment, financial and strategic performance measures
used in the 2018 scorecard. The performance categories, measures and weightings used in the 2019 scorecard were the
following:
●
Investment Excellence (30% weighting). Deliver investment excellence for clients (measured based on
three-year investment performance relative to benchmark);
● Financial Results (40% weighting). Deliver strong financial results for shareholders (measured based on
relative revenue growth, growth in net income before taxes and total net flows); and
● Strategic Results (30% weighting). Drive strategic results for long-term success for clients and shareholders
(measured based on executing JHG’s strategic vision and priorities, attracting strong talent, driving cultural
integration and alignment as one firm, managing areas of underperformance and delivering exceptional client
service).
124
125
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Establishing the Target Incentive Opportunity
The CEO’s variable compensation award is determined by multiplying a target incentive opportunity by a multiplier,
which ranges from 0% to 200%, based on the degree to which the scorecard performance measures are achieved.
At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee establishes the CEO’s target incentive opportunity, the
scorecard performance measures and weightings for the year. In doing so, the Compensation Committee considers
various factors, including our revenue and total AUM compared to the revenue and total AUM of a select peer group of
companies, as well as our relative performance against the JHG Peer Group shown below. The JHG Peer Group is
reviewed annually and no changes were made in 2019.
JHG’s Public Company Peer Group
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
Ameriprise (Columbia Threadneedle Investments), Inc.
BrightSphere Investment Group plc
Eaton Vance Corp.
Federated Investors, Inc.
Franklin Resources, Inc.
Invesco Ltd.
Legg Mason, Inc.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Schroders plc
Standard Life Aberdeen plc
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.
Our Compensation Committee believes that the reference to the JHG Peer Group is useful to ensure that the CEO’s
target incentive opportunity is competitive relative to compensation levels at other asset management firms with which
JHG competes for executive talent. Based on analysis and guidance from the Compensation Committee’s independent
compensation consultant, the Committee established a 2019 target incentive opportunity for the CEO of $7.50 million as
compared to $6.50 million in 2018. The Compensation Committee adjusted the CEO’s target incentive award for 2019
based on our transition from a co-CEO structure to a sole-CEO operating model and based on the market pay practices
of other companies in the JHG Peer Group.
Evaluating CEO Performance and Determining Variable Compensation
After the end of each year, the Compensation Committee utilizes the scorecard to evaluate the CEO’s performance
relative to the specific investment, financial and strategic performance objectives for the year. Based on the results
achieved, the Compensation Committee selects a multiplier for each performance measure in the scorecard, as well as an
overall performance multiplier range for each of the three categories of performance measures (i.e., investment results,
financial results and strategic results).
Performance
Multiplier Range
0.0 to 0.5
0.5 to 1.0
1.0 to 1.5
1.5 to 2.0
Level of Performance
Significant decline in absolute performance year-over-year
Bottom quartile performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
Slight decline to flat in absolute performance year-over-year
Slightly below median performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
Slight to moderate increase in absolute performance year-over-year
Slightly above median performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
Significant increase in absolute performance year-over-year
First or high second quartile performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
126
Table of Contents
The Compensation Committee determines a performance multiplier range for each of the three scorecard categories
(investment excellence, financial results, strategic results) based on a review of the following:
● Our year-over-year absolute results for the relevant performance measures;
● Our relative percentile ranking for each relevant performance measure as compared with the JHG Peer Group,
or as compared to applicable benchmarks; and
● With respect to strategic results, such factors as the Compensation Committee deems relevant to evaluate the
CEO’s performance, including, for example, factors such as executing JHG’s strategic vision and priorities,
attracting strong talent, driving cultural integration and alignment as one company, managing areas of
underperformance and delivering exceptional client service.
2019 Executive Compensation
For 2019, the CEO’s variable compensation declined 6% as compared to 2018. Variable compensation awards to our
other NEOs ranged from flat to down 6%, on an individual basis, as compared to 2018. This approach is consistent with
the Compensation Committee’s philosophy to align executive compensation with JHG’s results, as described below.
● Our investment performance remained strong, with 76% and 77% of our AUM outperforming benchmarks over
three- and five-year periods, respectively.
● Our financial results fell short of expectations; operating income and operating margin declined year-over-year
and net outflows were disappointing in 2019. On balance, operating expenses declined from 2018 to 2019,
demonstrating sound financial discipline, and we continue to maintain a strong balance sheet.
● We continued to execute on numerous strategic objectives, including hiring strong talent, continuing to build a
“one firm” culture and delivering exceptional client service.
Evaluating CEO Performance and Determining Variable Compensation
● Our total shareholder return improved in 2019 as compared to the prior year.
Summary of Total Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation earned by the CEO and the other NEOs, as a group, during 2019.
Establishing the Target Incentive Opportunity
The CEO’s variable compensation award is determined by multiplying a target incentive opportunity by a multiplier,
which ranges from 0% to 200%, based on the degree to which the scorecard performance measures are achieved.
At the beginning of each year, the Compensation Committee establishes the CEO’s target incentive opportunity, the
scorecard performance measures and weightings for the year. In doing so, the Compensation Committee considers
various factors, including our revenue and total AUM compared to the revenue and total AUM of a select peer group of
companies, as well as our relative performance against the JHG Peer Group shown below. The JHG Peer Group is
reviewed annually and no changes were made in 2019.
JHG’s Public Company Peer Group
Ameriprise (Columbia Threadneedle Investments), Inc.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.
BrightSphere Investment Group plc
Eaton Vance Corp.
Federated Investors, Inc.
Franklin Resources, Inc.
Invesco Ltd.
Legg Mason, Inc.
Schroders plc
Standard Life Aberdeen plc
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.
Our Compensation Committee believes that the reference to the JHG Peer Group is useful to ensure that the CEO’s
target incentive opportunity is competitive relative to compensation levels at other asset management firms with which
JHG competes for executive talent. Based on analysis and guidance from the Compensation Committee’s independent
compensation consultant, the Committee established a 2019 target incentive opportunity for the CEO of $7.50 million as
compared to $6.50 million in 2018. The Compensation Committee adjusted the CEO’s target incentive award for 2019
based on our transition from a co-CEO structure to a sole-CEO operating model and based on the market pay practices
of other companies in the JHG Peer Group.
After the end of each year, the Compensation Committee utilizes the scorecard to evaluate the CEO’s performance
relative to the specific investment, financial and strategic performance objectives for the year. Based on the results
achieved, the Compensation Committee selects a multiplier for each performance measure in the scorecard, as well as an
overall performance multiplier range for each of the three categories of performance measures (i.e., investment results,
financial results and strategic results).
Performance
Multiplier Range
0.0 to 0.5
0.5 to 1.0
1.0 to 1.5
1.5 to 2.0
Level of Performance
Significant decline in absolute performance year-over-year
Bottom quartile performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
Slight decline to flat in absolute performance year-over-year
Slightly below median performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
Slight to moderate increase in absolute performance year-over-year
Slightly above median performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
Significant increase in absolute performance year-over-year
First or high second quartile performance relative to the applicable peer group or benchmarks
All non-USD amounts in this schedule are stated in USD on the basis of the average FX rate for 2019 (GBP to USD = 1.2761).
Notes:
(1) The Other NEOs are Roger Thompson (Chief Financial Officer), Enrique Chang (Global Chief Investment Officer), Suzanne Cain (Global Head
of Distribution) and Bruce Koepfgen (Head of North America). Ms. Cain was hired on May 20, 2019.
(2) The amount of variable incentive compensation awarded in respect of the 2019 performance year and not subject to deferral.
(3) The amount of variable incentive compensation awarded in respect of the 2019 performance year and any one-time buyout awards, which are
subject to deferral, either under JHG policy or where mandated by regulatory requirements. Such amounts may be delivered in the form of
shares/units in Janus Henderson funds, restricted shares or performance shares. Awards vest in equal tranches over a three-year deferral period
(restricted share and restricted funds), except for PSUs, which cliff vest on the third anniversary of the grant date.
(4) For Mr. Weil, 50% of his variable compensation delivery is paid in cash and 50% is deferred, with half of the deferral amount delivered in PSUs
and the half in restricted JHG fund units. For the other NEOs, the percentage of variable compensation deferred is determined in accordance with
our standard deferral policy and may vary from one individual to another depending on particular circumstances. Amounts deferred for the other
NEOs will be delivered half in JHG restricted stock and half in restricted JHG fund units, provided that an annual $1,000,000 cap applies to the
JHG stock portion of the deferral and, once the cap is reached, the remaining balance will be invested into restricted JHG fund units. Fund units
are subject to the same vesting dates and conditions as stock awards.
126
127
725,000
1,706,619
3,712,500
7,338,368
1,856,250
4,722,184
—
4,512,063
Variable
Variable Comp (LTI)(3)
Restricted
Comp (STI)(2) Fund Units(4)
($)
($)
Shares
($)
($)
49,043
120,061
($)
1,899,413
462,216
Variable
Comp
($)
7,425,000
16,572,614
Executive Officer(1)
Richard Weil, CEO
Other NEOs
PSUs
($)
1,856,250
—
Total 2019 Benefits
Pension(5) Other(6)
Base
Salary
($)
and
Table of Contents Table of Contents
(5) For Mr. Weil and certain other NEOs, amounts shown include health benefits and insurance coverage consistent with that provided to all other
employees, 401(k) match contributions (U.S.) up to 5% of eligible compensation (capped at $280,000 per the IRS annual compensation limit), a
cash alternative to JHG’s defined contribution pension plan (UK) and ESOP dividends.
(6) For Mr. Weil, amounts shown in Other include (i) $1,584,716 in tax equalization and $223,421 in other relocation benefits per JHG policy as a
result of his 2017 move to the UK from the U.S., (ii) $83,095 in dividends on unvested shares, (iii) $7,671 in mark to market on mutual fund
retained units distributed during the year, and (iv) $510 in identify theft protection premiums. Mr. Weil's relocation benefits ended in April 2019
(excluding tax equalization for awards earned or made prior to April 2019), as agreed per the terms of his assignment. For certain other NEOs,
amounts shown include dividends on unvested JHG shares and fund units, mark to market on mutual fund retained units distributed during the
year, LTIP dividend equivalent amounts, identity theft protection premiums and travel reimbursements.
Compensation Committee Decisions About CEO Pay in 2019
Based on its evaluation of 2019 investment, financial and strategic results using the scorecard approach, the
Compensation Committee established a cumulative overall performance multiplier of 0.99 for the CEO as illustrated in
the table below. The overall performance multiplier is applied to the CEO’s target incentive opportunity of $7.50 million
in order to calculate the CEO’s 2019 variable compensation incentive award shown above.
2019 CEO Performance Highlights Based on the Scorecard
Below are the highlights from each scorecard category (investment excellence, financial and strategic results) that the
Compensation Committee considered when determining CEO variable compensation for 2019.
Investment Excellence (30% scorecard weighting)
The performance multiplier for this area is formulaically determined based on the percentage of AUM performing above
benchmarks on a three-year basis.
●
Investment performance continues to be strong. On an AUM-weighted basis over the three-year investment
period ending December 31, 2019, 76% of our total AUM outperformed the respective benchmarks, resulting in
a performance multiplier range of 1.5 to 2.0.
128
Table of Contents
(5) For Mr. Weil and certain other NEOs, amounts shown include health benefits and insurance coverage consistent with that provided to all other
employees, 401(k) match contributions (U.S.) up to 5% of eligible compensation (capped at $280,000 per the IRS annual compensation limit), a
cash alternative to JHG’s defined contribution pension plan (UK) and ESOP dividends.
(6) For Mr. Weil, amounts shown in Other include (i) $1,584,716 in tax equalization and $223,421 in other relocation benefits per JHG policy as a
result of his 2017 move to the UK from the U.S., (ii) $83,095 in dividends on unvested shares, (iii) $7,671 in mark to market on mutual fund
retained units distributed during the year, and (iv) $510 in identify theft protection premiums. Mr. Weil's relocation benefits ended in April 2019
(excluding tax equalization for awards earned or made prior to April 2019), as agreed per the terms of his assignment. For certain other NEOs,
amounts shown include dividends on unvested JHG shares and fund units, mark to market on mutual fund retained units distributed during the
year, LTIP dividend equivalent amounts, identity theft protection premiums and travel reimbursements.
Compensation Committee Decisions About CEO Pay in 2019
Based on its evaluation of 2019 investment, financial and strategic results using the scorecard approach, the
Compensation Committee established a cumulative overall performance multiplier of 0.99 for the CEO as illustrated in
the table below. The overall performance multiplier is applied to the CEO’s target incentive opportunity of $7.50 million
in order to calculate the CEO’s 2019 variable compensation incentive award shown above.
2019 CEO Performance Highlights Based on the Scorecard
Investment Excellence (30% scorecard weighting)
The performance multiplier for this area is formulaically determined based on the percentage of AUM performing above
benchmarks on a three-year basis.
●
Investment performance continues to be strong. On an AUM-weighted basis over the three-year investment
period ending December 31, 2019, 76% of our total AUM outperformed the respective benchmarks, resulting in
a performance multiplier range of 1.5 to 2.0.
Financial Results (40% scorecard weighting)
The performance multiplier for this component is determined: 50% on a formulaic basis according to JHG’s relative
financial performance versus the JHG Peer Group, and 50% based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective
assessment of the Company’s financial results.
● Financial — formulaic (20% scorecard weighting, 50% weighting for financial grouping)
The relative rankings of certain objective financial measures that the Compensation Committee determines to
be key indicators of our financial performance are evaluated each year. In 2019, the Compensation Committee
compared our one-year relative financial results for revenue growth, growth in net income before taxes and total
net flows to the average of the companies in the JHG Peer Group and established a performance multiplier
range of 0.0 to 0.5 for the formulaic portion of financial results.
● Financial — subjective (20% scorecard weighting, 50% weighting for financial grouping)
This multiplier rating for this portion of the financial component is determined based on the Compensation
Committee’s subjective assessment of the following three equally weighted measures:
Profit and loss results
versus prior year
2019 adjusted operating margin of 35.8% compared to 39.0% in 2018.
2019 adjusted net income before taxes of $647 million was down 7% as compared to the prior
year.
Total shareholder
return
Total shareholder return for JHG in 2019 was +26%, compared to +24% for the JHG Peer
Group and +32% for the S&P 500.
Balance sheet quality We maintain a strong balance sheet and continue to return significant cash to shareholders.
● In 2019, we paid $272 million in dividends and repurchased $200 million of our common
stock.
● We repurchased 9.4 million shares in 2019, reducing shares outstanding by 5%.
The CEO received a performance multiplier range of 0.0 to 0.5 on the subjective element of the financial results. Based
on the average of the formulaic and the subjective analyses, the Compensation Committee assigned the CEO a
performance multiplier range of 0.0 to 0.5 for the financial results component.
Below are the highlights from each scorecard category (investment excellence, financial and strategic results) that the
Compensation Committee considered when determining CEO variable compensation for 2019.
Strategic Results (30% scorecard weighting)
When determining the performance multiplier for strategic results in 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the
CEO’s performance across a broad range of strategic objectives, including:
128
129
Table of Contents Table of Contents
● Redefined our strategic priorities and vision, and rolled out to employees and shareholders.
● Continued to drive post-merger cultural integration and alignment as “one firm.”
● Provided decisive leadership in addressing specific business challenges and effectively managed isolated areas
of underperformance across the investments, sales and support areas.
● Attracted strong talent, including Suzanne Cain as Global Head of Distribution, our new Global Emerging
Markets team, a new Head of US Fixed Income and a Global Head of Enterprise Risk.
● Delivered a number of projects that reduced complexity and increased efficiency across our operating model,
including platform convergence of regional client relationship management systems into a global system,
delivery of a single global web platform and delivery of a unified client onboarding system.
The Compensation Committee assigned a performance multiplier range of 1.0 to 1.5 for the CEO based on the analysis
of strategic results.
LTI Awards Granted in Consideration of 2019 Performance
In February 2020, the following LTI awards will be granted to the CEO and other NEOs:
Executive Officer
Richard Weil, CEO
Other NEOs(4)
Type of
award
PSU (1)
Funds(2)
RSUs(2)
Funds (2)
Basis of
award
(% of salary)
Number
Face value
of award
($’000)
Share
price ($) (3)(4)
26.17
—
of units
granted
70,930 1,856,250
— 1,856,250
26.17 119,113 3,117,184
— 4,722,184
—
256 %
256 %
183 %
277 %
(1) PSUs equal to 25% of total variable pay, vesting after a three-year period, subject to a TSR-based multiplier
(which can be between 0% and 200%). Only the CEO receives an element of his variable pay in this form.
Vesting determined by performance over three years.
(2) Executives receive half of their LTI in JHG restricted fund units and half in JHG restricted shares, with the
choice of receiving 100% in JHG restricted shares (subject to a $1 million limit).
(3) Represents the fair market value (“FMV”) of $26.17 (calculated as the average high of $26.645 and low of
$25.69 on February 19, 2020). The actual FMV will be determined on the grant date of February 28, 2020, as
required by ASC Topic 718.
(4) The Other NEOs are Roger Thompson (Chief Financial Officer), Enrique Chang (Global Chief Investment
Officer), Suzanne Cain (Global Head of Distribution) and Bruce Koepfgen (Head of North America).
LTI Awards Vested in 2019
The table below shows the details of awards that vested during 2019 or had performance criteria measured during 2019:
No. of
shares
acquired
on
vesting (#)
36,347
23,831
9,791
111,897
—
Value
realized
on
vesting ($)
892,657
—
505,667
1,311,733 (4)
2,557,372
2,696,946
Name
Richard Weil
Other NEOs
Award type
Restricted Shares
PSU 2016(1)
Funds(2)
LTIP 2016 (tranche 1)(3)
Restricted Shares
Funds(2)
130
Table of Contents
● Redefined our strategic priorities and vision, and rolled out to employees and shareholders.
● Continued to drive post-merger cultural integration and alignment as “one firm.”
● Provided decisive leadership in addressing specific business challenges and effectively managed isolated areas
of underperformance across the investments, sales and support areas.
● Attracted strong talent, including Suzanne Cain as Global Head of Distribution, our new Global Emerging
Markets team, a new Head of US Fixed Income and a Global Head of Enterprise Risk.
● Delivered a number of projects that reduced complexity and increased efficiency across our operating model,
including platform convergence of regional client relationship management systems into a global system,
delivery of a single global web platform and delivery of a unified client onboarding system.
(1) Mr. Weil’s PSU granted in 2016 measured as of December 31, 2019, reflects 33% vesting based on a TSR
percentile rank of 38%. The value realized on vesting (after Compensation Committee approval on February 4,
2020) was significantly lower as compared to the grant date value of $1.778 million.
(2) These are from awards invested into JHG funds/products.
(3) The LTIP 2016 Tranche 1 post-Merger awards vesting at 35.5% were based on measurement criteria as of
December 31, 2018.
(4) This amount represents the value of LTIP awards exercised in 2019 but vested prior to 2019. The vested value
cannot be determined until the award is exercised.
The Compensation Committee assigned a performance multiplier range of 1.0 to 1.5 for the CEO based on the analysis
Service Agreements and Settlement Arrangements with Executive Officers
We entered into a service agreement with Mr. Weil effective August 1, 2018, at the time of his appointment as our sole
CEO, and which supersedes the change in control agreement that Mr. Weil was previously subject to. We also remain
party to a service agreement with Mr. Thompson that was entered into prior to the Merger. These agreements include
provisions for certain payments in lieu of 12 months’ notice upon termination and other benefits. The foregoing is a
summary only and does not propose to be a complete description of the terms and provisions of these service
agreements. This description is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the previously filed
service agreements of Mr. Weil and Mr. Thompson.
Non-Executive Director Compensation
The following chart shows the compensation that each non-executive director was paid for his or her services in calendar
year 2019:
Name
Richard Gillingwater
Glenn S. Schafer
Sarah Arkle(1)(3)
Kalpana Desai (4)
Jeffrey J. Diermeier
Kevin Dolan
Eugene Flood Jr. (5)
Lawrence E. Kochard
Angela Seymour-Jackson(3)
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash ($) (1)
240,000
225,000
30,833
127,500
155,000
127,500
162,500
135,000
195,692
—
Stock
awards
($) (2)
160,000
160,000
—
—
130,000
130,000
130,000
130,000
130,000
—
All other
compensation
($) (6)
—
24,781
—
—
13,692
—
1,750
58,071
—
—
Total ($)
400,000
409,781
30,833
127,500
298,692
257,500
294,250
323,071
325,692
—
(1) Amounts represent the annual cash fees for serving as members of the JHG Board of Directors, including non-executive Chairman and
committee membership fees. Mr. Lawrence Kochard deferred all his cash fees in 2019 under the Director Deferred Compensation Plan. Ms.
Sarah Arkle resigned from the JHG Board of Directors effective February 25, 2019.
(2) Amounts represent the value of the annual 2019/2020 stock award. JHG shares were awarded (after applicable taxes were deducted) using
the closing price of JHG shares on the NYSE on May 3, 2019, of $22.54. Mr. Glenn Schafer elected to receive the value of the stock award
in cash.
(3) These directors also earn an additional annual board fee of $40,000 for serving on the JH Group Holdings Asset Management Ltd board.
(4) The annual stock award for Ms. Kalpana Desai was not delivered until February 4, 2020, which explains why there is no value in the table
above as of December 31, 2019.
(5) Mr. Eugene Flood earns an additional observation fee of $10,000 on the JH Group Holdings Asset Management Ltd board.
131
of strategic results.
LTI Awards Granted in Consideration of 2019 Performance
In February 2020, the following LTI awards will be granted to the CEO and other NEOs:
Executive Officer
Richard Weil, CEO
Other NEOs(4)
Type of
award
PSU (1)
Funds(2)
RSUs(2)
Funds (2)
Basis of
award
(% of salary)
price ($) (3)(4)
Share
Number
Face value
of units
granted
of award
($’000)
256 %
256 %
183 %
277 %
26.17
70,930 1,856,250
—
— 1,856,250
26.17 119,113 3,117,184
—
— 4,722,184
(1) PSUs equal to 25% of total variable pay, vesting after a three-year period, subject to a TSR-based multiplier
(which can be between 0% and 200%). Only the CEO receives an element of his variable pay in this form.
Vesting determined by performance over three years.
(2) Executives receive half of their LTI in JHG restricted fund units and half in JHG restricted shares, with the
choice of receiving 100% in JHG restricted shares (subject to a $1 million limit).
(3) Represents the fair market value (“FMV”) of $26.17 (calculated as the average high of $26.645 and low of
$25.69 on February 19, 2020). The actual FMV will be determined on the grant date of February 28, 2020, as
required by ASC Topic 718.
(4) The Other NEOs are Roger Thompson (Chief Financial Officer), Enrique Chang (Global Chief Investment
Officer), Suzanne Cain (Global Head of Distribution) and Bruce Koepfgen (Head of North America).
LTI Awards Vested in 2019
The table below shows the details of awards that vested during 2019 or had performance criteria measured during 2019:
No. of
shares
acquired
on
vesting (#)
36,347
23,831
9,791
111,897
—
Value
realized
on
vesting ($)
892,657
—
505,667
1,311,733 (4)
2,557,372
2,696,946
Name
Richard Weil
Other NEOs
Award type
Restricted Shares
PSU 2016(1)
Funds(2)
LTIP 2016 (tranche 1)(3)
Restricted Shares
Funds(2)
130
Table of Contents Table of Contents
(6)
“All Other Compensation” includes the following in the table below:
Name
Richard Gillingwater
Glenn S. Schafer
Sarah Arkle
Kalpana Desai
Jeffrey J. Diermeier
Kevin Dolan
Eugene Flood Jr.
Lawrence E. Kochard
Angela Seymour-Jackson
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto
Dividends on
unvested restricted
Other ($) (1) stock units ($) (2) Total ($)
—
24,781
—
—
13,692
—
1,750
58,071
—
—
—
22,521
—
—
11,942
—
—
56,321
—
—
—
2,260
—
—
1,750
—
1,750
1,750
—
—
(1) The amount includes company funded UK tax preparation fees for U.S. Board members plus the membership fees for identity theft protection
services paid by JHG on behalf of the director. JHG also reimburses travel expenses for Board meetings which are not included in the above
table.
(2) This amount represents the value of dividend equivalents awarded in the form of RSUs in 2019 on all grants deferred under the Director Deferred
Fee Plan. The RSUs held by each independent director as of December 31, 2019, are as follows: Mr. Diermeier holds 8,612 RSUs; Mr. Kochard
holds 40,691 RSUs; and Mr. Schafer holds 16,247 RSUs.
132
Table of Contents
Name
Richard Gillingwater
Glenn S. Schafer
Sarah Arkle
Kalpana Desai
Jeffrey J. Diermeier
Kevin Dolan
Eugene Flood Jr.
Lawrence E. Kochard
Angela Seymour-Jackson
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto
Dividends on
unvested restricted
Other ($) (1) stock units ($) (2) Total ($)
—
2,260
—
—
1,750
—
1,750
1,750
—
—
11,942
13,692
22,521
24,781
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,750
—
—
56,321
58,071
(1) The amount includes company funded UK tax preparation fees for U.S. Board members plus the membership fees for identity theft protection
services paid by JHG on behalf of the director. JHG also reimburses travel expenses for Board meetings which are not included in the above
table.
(2) This amount represents the value of dividend equivalents awarded in the form of RSUs in 2019 on all grants deferred under the Director Deferred
Fee Plan. The RSUs held by each independent director as of December 31, 2019, are as follows: Mr. Diermeier holds 8,612 RSUs; Mr. Kochard
holds 40,691 RSUs; and Mr. Schafer holds 16,247 RSUs.
(6)
“All Other Compensation” includes the following in the table below:
Interests in Group Shares
The following table shows the interests in Group shares, both unvested shares held pursuant to Group share plans and
beneficially owned, by executive directors and other named executives. The table also shows the movement in these
holdings during 2019:
Interest at
December 31,
2018(1)
61,032
159,375
488
Vested
Vested in
Vested
previous
2019 not 2019 and years and
Awarded exercised exercised exercised Vested
36,347
38,236 (2)
—
—
83,863
32 (3)
—
—
—
—
—
—
Interest at
December 31,
2019
Plan
RSA
PSU
ESOP
Type
Shares
Shares
Shares
Options
SAYE
BAYE
Shares
DEP/ESOP Shares
Options
LTIP
Shares
RSP
978
1,529
17,142
77,068
25,080
—
526 (4)
6,864
—
12,165
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
11,588
—
—
—
—
43,593
—
—
—
7,294
12,096 (5)
2,003
Richard Weil
Total outstanding interests in JHG share schemes
Total shares held outright outside JHG share
schemes
Total interests in JHG
Roger Thompson
Total outstanding interests in JHG share schemes
Total shares held outright outside JHG share
schemes
Total interests in JHG
Enrique Chang
RSA
ESOP
Shares
Shares
121,840
90
12,166
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
53,401
—
Total outstanding interests in JHG share schemes
Total shares held outright outside JHG share
schemes
Total interests in JHG
Suzanne Cain
Total outstanding interests in JHG share schemes
Total shares held outright outside JHG share
schemes
Total interests in JHG
RSA
ESOP
Shares
Shares
—
—
65,828 (6)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Bruce Koepfgen
RSA
SOP
ESOP
Shares
Options
Shares
116,480
92,949
251
64,933
—
17
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
92,949
—
49,199
—
—
Total outstanding interests in JHG share schemes
Total shares held outright outside JHG share
schemes
Total interests in JHG
24,685
165,284
520
190,489
908,608
1,099,097
978
2,055
16,712
9,791
35,242
64,778
59,950
124,728
80,605
96
80,701
273,060
353,761
65,828
—
65,828
—
65,828
132,214
—
268
132,482
151,441
283,923
(1) For Mr. Weil, the total amount reflects the number of units measured (38%) on December 31, 2019, based on TSR performance for his PSU
award granted in 2016. The shares from the 2016 PSU vested on February 4, 2020, after the calculation was approved by the Compensation
Committee and are not reflected in this table.
(2) The vested PSU amount represents the shares vesting from the 2015 PSU, which was measured on December 31, 2018, and vested on
February 11, 2019 after the calculation was approved by the Compensation Committee.
(3) The ESOP (401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan) shares represent dividend reinvestments from prior employer contributions made
to the plan.
(4) The BAYE (Buy As You Earn) shares represent purchases made from employee contributions plus 1:1 matching shares (up to £1,800 per
year).
(5) The LTIP shares in the Vested column represent options that were vested but forfeited due to performance conditions.
(6) Ms. Cain received a buyout award upon hire in restricted stock to compensate for forfeitures from her prior employer.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee of JHG comprised Lawrence Kochard, Richard Gillingwater, Glenn Schafer and Angela
Seymour-Jackson. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries during fiscal year 2019, and no member of the Compensation Committee was formerly an officer of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries or was a party to any disclosable related person transaction involving the Company
132
133
Table of Contents Table of Contents
for the same period. During fiscal year 2019, none of the executive officers of the Company served on the board of
directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity that has or had executive officers serving as a member of
the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the Company.
Information responding to Item 407(e)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K is omitted because the Company is a “foreign private
issuer” as defined in SEC Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The table below sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock as of
February 21, 2020, or as otherwise noted, by (i) beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock
who have publicly disclosed their ownership; (ii) each executive officer (defined below) and each member of our Board
of Directors; and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. We have no knowledge of any arrangement
that would at a subsequent date result in a change in control of JHG.
Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (1)
Name
Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.(2)
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
Silchester International Investors LLP(4)
The Vanguard Group Inc.(5)
Richard Gillingwater, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Glenn S. Schafer, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors(6)
Richard Weil, CEO and Director
Kalpana Desai, Director
Jeffrey Diermeier, Director(6)
Kevin Dolan, Director
Eugene Flood Jr., Director
Lawrence Kochard, Director(6)
Angela Seymour-Jackson, Director
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto, Director
Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
Enrique Chang, Chief Investment Officer
Suzanne Cain, Global Head of Distribution
Bruce Koepfgen, Head of North America
All directors and executive officers as a Group (14 persons)
*
Less than 1% of the outstanding shares.
Number
30,668,922
18,685,728
17,761,063
15,175,829
11,755
34,564
949,457
10,675
75,011
6,929
116
50,822
7,101
—
111,904
343,237
62,762
277,302
1,941,635
Percentage
16.40
9.99
9.50
8.12
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.04
Unless otherwise stated below, the principal address of each person is c/o Janus Henderson Group plc, 201 Bishopsgate,
London EC2M 3AE.
(1) Ownership, both direct and indirect, is based on the number of shares outstanding as of February 21, 2020,
including unvested RSUs and DEP shares that will vest within 60 days of February 21, 2020, and any shares
that may be acquired upon the exercise of options within 60 days of February 21, 2020.
(2) Information regarding beneficial ownership of the shares by Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. (“Dai-ichi”) is based
on a Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020, relating to such shares beneficially owned as of
December 31, 2019. Such report provides that Dai-ichi is the beneficial owner, has sole dispositive power and
134
Table of Contents
for the same period. During fiscal year 2019, none of the executive officers of the Company served on the board of
directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity that has or had executive officers serving as a member of
the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the Company.
Information responding to Item 407(e)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K is omitted because the Company is a “foreign private
issuer” as defined in SEC Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The table below sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock as of
February 21, 2020, or as otherwise noted, by (i) beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock
who have publicly disclosed their ownership; (ii) each executive officer (defined below) and each member of our Board
of Directors; and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. We have no knowledge of any arrangement
that would at a subsequent date result in a change in control of JHG.
Richard Gillingwater, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Glenn S. Schafer, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors(6)
Name
Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.(2)
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
Silchester International Investors LLP(4)
The Vanguard Group Inc.(5)
Richard Weil, CEO and Director
Kalpana Desai, Director
Jeffrey Diermeier, Director(6)
Kevin Dolan, Director
Eugene Flood Jr., Director
Lawrence Kochard, Director(6)
Angela Seymour-Jackson, Director
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto, Director
Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
Enrique Chang, Chief Investment Officer
Suzanne Cain, Global Head of Distribution
Bruce Koepfgen, Head of North America
Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned (1)
Number
Percentage
30,668,922
18,685,728
17,761,063
15,175,829
16.40
9.99
9.50
8.12
11,755
34,564
949,457
10,675
75,011
6,929
116
50,822
7,101
—
111,904
343,237
62,762
277,302
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
All directors and executive officers as a Group (14 persons)
1,941,635
1.04
*
Less than 1% of the outstanding shares.
Unless otherwise stated below, the principal address of each person is c/o Janus Henderson Group plc, 201 Bishopsgate,
London EC2M 3AE.
(1) Ownership, both direct and indirect, is based on the number of shares outstanding as of February 21, 2020,
including unvested RSUs and DEP shares that will vest within 60 days of February 21, 2020, and any shares
that may be acquired upon the exercise of options within 60 days of February 21, 2020.
(2) Information regarding beneficial ownership of the shares by Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. (“Dai-ichi”) is based
on a Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020, relating to such shares beneficially owned as of
December 31, 2019. Such report provides that Dai-ichi is the beneficial owner, has sole dispositive power and
has sole voting power with respect to all shares. The address of Dai-ichi Life is 13-1, Yurakucho 1-Chome,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8411 Japan.
(3) Information regarding beneficial ownership of the shares by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020, relating to such shares beneficially owned as of
December 31, 2019. Such report provides that BlackRock is the beneficial owner of and has sole dispositive
power with respect to all the shares. Such report provides that BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to
17,838,475 shares and shared voting power with respect to zero shares. BlackRock’s address is 55 East 52nd
Street, New York, NY 10055.
(4) Information regarding beneficial ownership of the shares by Silchester International Investors LLP
(“Silchester”) is based on a Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on February 13, 2020, relating to such shares
beneficially owned as of December 31, 2019. Such report provides that Silchester is the beneficial owner, has
sole dispositive power and has sole voting power with respect to all shares. Silchester’s address is 1 Bruton
Street London, W1J6TL, United Kingdom.
(5) Information regarding beneficial ownership of the shares by The Vanguard Group Inc. (“Vanguard”) is based
on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2020, relating to such shares beneficially owned as of
December 31, 2019. Such report provides that Vanguard is the beneficial owner, has sole dispositive power
with respect to 15,086,515 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 89,314 shares. Such report
provided that Vanguard has sole voting power with respect to 79,907 shares and shared voting power with
respect to 30,013 shares. Vanguard’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355.
(6) Includes RSUs held by certain directors. Such restricted stock units do not have any voting rights, are entitled to
dividend equivalents and will be paid in shares of JHG common stock upon voluntary termination of service as
a director, all in accordance with the Director Deferred Fee Plan and JHG’s LTI stock plans. The RSUs
represented in the amounts shown are as follows: Mr. Diermeier – 8,612 units; Mr. Kochard – 40,691 units; and
Mr. Schafer – 16,247 units.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table presents information, determined as of February 21, 2020, about outstanding awards and shares
remaining available for issuance under our equity-based LTI plans:
Number of
securities
to be
issued
upon
exercise of
outstanding Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
(a)
options, warrants
and rights (b)
170,107 $
— $
170,107 $
— (2)
—
—
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance
under equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
(c)
3,502,116
372,345
3,874,461
Plan category
Equity comp plans approved by shareholders(1)
Equity comp plans not approved by shareholders(3)
Total(4)
134
135
(1) Includes the legacy Henderson Group plc Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”); however, we do not intend to
issue any further awards under this compensation plan.
Table of Contents Table of Contents
(2) There is no exercise price associated with the outstanding LTIP.
(3) Includes outstanding awards granted under the Janus Henderson Group plc 2012 Employment Inducement
Award Plan. This plan did not previously have shareholder approval; however, this plan was approved by
shareholders with all other equity plans in 2018.
(4) Consists of the following ongoing plans assumed by JHG pursuant to the Merger that may result in new awards:
Equity Plan Summary
Introduction: We award equity-based grants from several plans, last approved by shareholders on May 3, 2018. The
plans are intended to allow employees to acquire or increase equity ownership in JHG, thereby strengthening their
commitment to our success and stimulating their efforts on behalf of JHG, and to assist JHG in attracting new
employees and in retaining existing employees. The plans are also intended to optimize the profitability and growth
of JHG through incentives that are consistent with our goals, to provide employees an incentive for excellence in
individual performance and to promote teamwork among employees. Equity awards may be issued from the
following plans in 2019:
Janus Henderson Group plc Deferred Equity Plan:
The Deferred Equity Plan (“DEP”) is our deferral mechanism in which participants can elect to receive (“voluntary
deferral”) or can be required to receive (“mandatory deferral”), on a deferred basis, all or a portion of their annual
cash bonus in the form of JHG shares and/or an interest in an investment fund managed by us (“Fund Interest”). The
deferral period can be between one and five years and participants are entitled to receive their shares or Fund
Interest, at the end of a specified restricted period subject to remaining employed by JHG during that time.
Janus Henderson Group Long-Term Incentive Plan:
Long-Term Incentive Plan awards provide selected employees restricted shares or nil cost options that have
employment and performance conditions. Employees who have been awarded such options have five and four years
to exercise their options following the three- and four-year vesting period. In addition, there is a two- and one-year
holding period from the date of vesting. We do not currently issue awards from this plan.
Henderson Group Plc Restricted Share Plan:
The Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”) is a discretionary share plan under which participants receive an award of shares
that is released at the end of a restricted period. The RSP is often used by us as a mechanism to compensate new
hires for the forfeiture of awards from their previous employer and to provide an incentive to existing staff that may
be subject to the achievement of material performance
Janus Henderson Group plc Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan:
The Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (“2010 LTI Plan”) is our deferral
mechanism in which employees, directors, and consultants performing services for us or our subsidiaries may be
issued JHG common stock subject to restrictions on transfer and vesting requirements. The recipient has the same
rights as a JHG shareholder and the shares are subject to a minimum vesting period of at least 12 months. Under the
2010 LTI Plan, we may award restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs, stock options, and stock appreciation rights.
Janus Henderson Group plc 2012 Employment Inducement Award Plan:
The 2012 Employment Inducement Award Plan (“2012 EIA Plan”) is intended to assist us in attracting new
employees, and to allow new employees of JHG and its subsidiaries to acquire equity ownership in JHG. In
accordance with the NYSE rules, the 2012 EIA Plan only permits awards to newly hired employees of JHG. Awards
made under this plan require the issuance of a press release and NYSE notification of the additional shares being
136
Table of Contents
(2) There is no exercise price associated with the outstanding LTIP.
(3) Includes outstanding awards granted under the Janus Henderson Group plc 2012 Employment Inducement
Award Plan. This plan did not previously have shareholder approval; however, this plan was approved by
shareholders with all other equity plans in 2018.
(4) Consists of the following ongoing plans assumed by JHG pursuant to the Merger that may result in new awards:
Equity Plan Summary
Introduction: We award equity-based grants from several plans, last approved by shareholders on May 3, 2018. The
plans are intended to allow employees to acquire or increase equity ownership in JHG, thereby strengthening their
commitment to our success and stimulating their efforts on behalf of JHG, and to assist JHG in attracting new
employees and in retaining existing employees. The plans are also intended to optimize the profitability and growth
of JHG through incentives that are consistent with our goals, to provide employees an incentive for excellence in
individual performance and to promote teamwork among employees. Equity awards may be issued from the
following plans in 2019:
Janus Henderson Group plc Deferred Equity Plan:
The Deferred Equity Plan (“DEP”) is our deferral mechanism in which participants can elect to receive (“voluntary
deferral”) or can be required to receive (“mandatory deferral”), on a deferred basis, all or a portion of their annual
cash bonus in the form of JHG shares and/or an interest in an investment fund managed by us (“Fund Interest”). The
deferral period can be between one and five years and participants are entitled to receive their shares or Fund
Interest, at the end of a specified restricted period subject to remaining employed by JHG during that time.
Janus Henderson Group Long-Term Incentive Plan:
Long-Term Incentive Plan awards provide selected employees restricted shares or nil cost options that have
employment and performance conditions. Employees who have been awarded such options have five and four years
to exercise their options following the three- and four-year vesting period. In addition, there is a two- and one-year
holding period from the date of vesting. We do not currently issue awards from this plan.
Henderson Group Plc Restricted Share Plan:
The Restricted Share Plan (“RSP”) is a discretionary share plan under which participants receive an award of shares
that is released at the end of a restricted period. The RSP is often used by us as a mechanism to compensate new
hires for the forfeiture of awards from their previous employer and to provide an incentive to existing staff that may
be subject to the achievement of material performance
The Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (“2010 LTI Plan”) is our deferral
mechanism in which employees, directors, and consultants performing services for us or our subsidiaries may be
issued JHG common stock subject to restrictions on transfer and vesting requirements. The recipient has the same
rights as a JHG shareholder and the shares are subject to a minimum vesting period of at least 12 months. Under the
2010 LTI Plan, we may award restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs, stock options, and stock appreciation rights.
Janus Henderson Group plc 2012 Employment Inducement Award Plan:
The 2012 Employment Inducement Award Plan (“2012 EIA Plan”) is intended to assist us in attracting new
employees, and to allow new employees of JHG and its subsidiaries to acquire equity ownership in JHG. In
accordance with the NYSE rules, the 2012 EIA Plan only permits awards to newly hired employees of JHG. Awards
made under this plan require the issuance of a press release and NYSE notification of the additional shares being
issued. The 2012 EIA Plan is not frequently used for long-term incentive awards. Under the 2012 EIA Plan, we may
award restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs, stock options, and stock appreciation rights under substantially the same terms
as the 2010 LTI Plan, except there is no minimum vesting period.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Related Party Transaction Policy
Our related party transaction approval policy provides that related party transactions must be pre-approved by the Audit
Committee. Related party transactions include any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any
indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which
JHG was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had or will
have a direct or indirect material interest. Our related party transaction approval policy is part of our Corporate Code of
Business Conduct available on our website at http://www.janushenderson.com/group under “About Janus Henderson”
link, “Governance Policies and Statements.”
Related Party Transactions
Certain of our directors and executive officers, as well as their immediate family members, from time to time may invest
their personal funds in JHG funds on substantially the same terms and conditions as other similarly situated investors in
these funds who are not our directors, officers or employees.
Other than as disclosed below, none of our directors or senior management has or has had (i) any material interest in any
transaction with us or any of our subsidiaries or (ii) any interest in any transaction which is or was unusual in its nature
or conditions or is or was significant to our business and which was effected by us or any of our subsidiaries in the
preceding three financial years. There are no outstanding loans or guarantees provided by us or any of our subsidiaries
for the benefit of our directors or senior management.
Amended and Restated Investment and Strategic Cooperation Agreement
On October 3, 2016, Henderson, JCG and Dai-ichi entered into an Amended and Restated Investment and Strategic
Cooperation Agreement (the “Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement”). Following the effective time of the
Merger, we succeeded to the rights and obligations of JCG under the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement.
Ownership Limit
Dai-ichi has agreed not to acquire more than 20% of our issued and outstanding shares (“the ownership limit”), and to
reduce its percentage ownership to the ownership limit should its percentage ownership exceed the ownership limit at
any time.
Janus Henderson Group plc Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan:
Invested Assets; Distribution
Under the terms of the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement, subject to certain conditions, Dai-ichi has
agreed to maintain investments in investment products of JHG and our affiliates of not less than $2.5 billion. A certain
proportion of Dai-ichi’s investments will continue to be held in seed capital investments. In addition, we and Dai-ichi
have agreed to cooperate in good faith and use commercially reasonable efforts to sell investment products through each
other’s distribution channels.
Board Designation Right
Dai-ichi has the right to designate a representative for appointment to our Board of Directors until such right is
terminated in accordance with the terms of the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement. Dai-ichi’s right to
designate a representative may be terminated under certain circumstances set forth in the Amended Investment and
Cooperation Agreement, and in particular is dependent on Dai-ichi maintaining a shareholding in JHG above the
applicable percentage (as described below).
136
137
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Standstill Restrictions
Dai-ichi is subject to certain standstill restrictions and, subject to certain exceptions, cannot, in each case without the
consent of our Board of Directors, among other things, initiate tender or exchange offers for securities of JHG or our
subsidiaries, seek the nomination or election of any individual as a director of JHG (other than Dai-ichi’s right to
designate a representative as described above), participate in any recapitalization, restructuring, liquidation, dissolution
or other similar extraordinary transaction with respect to us or our subsidiaries, acquire or obtain any economic interest
in our securities (other than the acquisition of up to 20% of our issued and outstanding shares as permitted by the
Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement) or dispose of any of our shares in an unsolicited tender offer (other
than under certain circumstances as permitted by the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement). In addition, the
standstill restrictions will be suspended if Dai-ichi’s ownership falls below 3% of our issued and outstanding shares and,
with certain exceptions, terminated if we experience a change of control.
Transfer Restrictions
Dai-ichi is subject to certain limitations on its ability to transfer its JHG shares. Dai-ichi may transfer its shares (i) to the
general public through a JHG registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 (if then applicable), subject to certain
limitations, including that Dai-ichi may not, without JHG’s prior written consent, transfer shares to any person who
would, to Dai-ichi’s knowledge, after giving effect to the transfer, beneficially own 5% or more of JHG’s common
stock; (ii) in a manner not requiring registration under the Securities Act or involving any block trade pursuant to an
exercise by Dai-ichi of its registration rights, subject to certain limitations, including that Dai-ichi may not transfer
shares to any person who, together with its affiliates, would, to Dai-ichi’s knowledge after reasonable inquiry, after
giving effect to the transfer, beneficially own 5% or more of JHG’s common stock; and (iii) and to certain affiliated
entities of Dai-ichi if, among other things, such transferee agrees to be bound by Dai-ichi’s obligations under the
Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement as in effect immediately prior to such transfer. We are generally
entitled to a right of first offer or a right of first refusal, depending on the nature of the proposed transfer, with respect to
any proposed transfer by Dai-ichi of its JHG shares.
Preemptive Rights
In the event that we propose to issue new JHG shares, for so long as Dai-ichi maintains its shareholding in JHG at the
level in existence immediately after the effective time of the Merger (subject to dilution in certain circumstance) (the
“applicable percentage”), Dai-ichi has the right to purchase up to such number of our shares that would allow Dai-ichi to
maintain a percentage ownership of the issued and outstanding JHG shares that is, after giving effect to the issuance of
the new securities, no less than the percentage ownership Dai-ichi had prior to such issuance. Dai-ichi is entitled to
exercise its preemptive rights in respect of our issuance of new securities to provide equity compensation for
employment for its directors, officers or employees only if such issuance would cause Dai-ichi’s percentage ownership
to decrease to less than the applicable percentage. In each case, Dai-ichi does not have preemptive rights to the extent
that an issuance of the additional JHG shares to Dai-ichi would require approval of our shareholders pursuant to Rule
312 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual or any successor rule thereof or ASX Listing Rule 7.1 or
any successor rule thereof, unless such approval has been obtained.
Registration Rights
Without limiting the restrictions on transfers described above, Dai-ichi is entitled to customary registration rights,
including the right to require us to file up to two registration statements to register JHG shares owned by Dai-ichi (the
“Registrable Shares”), and unlimited prospectus supplements in connection with any take down from an effective shelf
registration statement. In addition, Dai-ichi has certain “piggyback” registration rights with respect to the Registrable
Shares to participate in certain securities offerings by us.
Termination
The Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement may be terminated by either us or Dai-ichi under specified
circumstances, including (i) there is an insolvency event with respect to the other party, (ii) if such termination is
necessary to comply with applicable law, effectively binding written or oral administrative guidance from a
138
Table of Contents Standstill Restrictions
Dai-ichi is subject to certain standstill restrictions and, subject to certain exceptions, cannot, in each case without the
consent of our Board of Directors, among other things, initiate tender or exchange offers for securities of JHG or our
subsidiaries, seek the nomination or election of any individual as a director of JHG (other than Dai-ichi’s right to
designate a representative as described above), participate in any recapitalization, restructuring, liquidation, dissolution
or other similar extraordinary transaction with respect to us or our subsidiaries, acquire or obtain any economic interest
in our securities (other than the acquisition of up to 20% of our issued and outstanding shares as permitted by the
Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement) or dispose of any of our shares in an unsolicited tender offer (other
than under certain circumstances as permitted by the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement). In addition, the
standstill restrictions will be suspended if Dai-ichi’s ownership falls below 3% of our issued and outstanding shares and,
with certain exceptions, terminated if we experience a change of control.
Transfer Restrictions
Dai-ichi is subject to certain limitations on its ability to transfer its JHG shares. Dai-ichi may transfer its shares (i) to the
general public through a JHG registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 (if then applicable), subject to certain
limitations, including that Dai-ichi may not, without JHG’s prior written consent, transfer shares to any person who
would, to Dai-ichi’s knowledge, after giving effect to the transfer, beneficially own 5% or more of JHG’s common
stock; (ii) in a manner not requiring registration under the Securities Act or involving any block trade pursuant to an
exercise by Dai-ichi of its registration rights, subject to certain limitations, including that Dai-ichi may not transfer
shares to any person who, together with its affiliates, would, to Dai-ichi’s knowledge after reasonable inquiry, after
giving effect to the transfer, beneficially own 5% or more of JHG’s common stock; and (iii) and to certain affiliated
entities of Dai-ichi if, among other things, such transferee agrees to be bound by Dai-ichi’s obligations under the
Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement as in effect immediately prior to such transfer. We are generally
entitled to a right of first offer or a right of first refusal, depending on the nature of the proposed transfer, with respect to
any proposed transfer by Dai-ichi of its JHG shares.
Preemptive Rights
In the event that we propose to issue new JHG shares, for so long as Dai-ichi maintains its shareholding in JHG at the
level in existence immediately after the effective time of the Merger (subject to dilution in certain circumstance) (the
“applicable percentage”), Dai-ichi has the right to purchase up to such number of our shares that would allow Dai-ichi to
maintain a percentage ownership of the issued and outstanding JHG shares that is, after giving effect to the issuance of
the new securities, no less than the percentage ownership Dai-ichi had prior to such issuance. Dai-ichi is entitled to
exercise its preemptive rights in respect of our issuance of new securities to provide equity compensation for
employment for its directors, officers or employees only if such issuance would cause Dai-ichi’s percentage ownership
to decrease to less than the applicable percentage. In each case, Dai-ichi does not have preemptive rights to the extent
that an issuance of the additional JHG shares to Dai-ichi would require approval of our shareholders pursuant to Rule
312 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual or any successor rule thereof or ASX Listing Rule 7.1 or
any successor rule thereof, unless such approval has been obtained.
Without limiting the restrictions on transfers described above, Dai-ichi is entitled to customary registration rights,
including the right to require us to file up to two registration statements to register JHG shares owned by Dai-ichi (the
“Registrable Shares”), and unlimited prospectus supplements in connection with any take down from an effective shelf
registration statement. In addition, Dai-ichi has certain “piggyback” registration rights with respect to the Registrable
Shares to participate in certain securities offerings by us.
Registration Rights
Termination
The Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement may be terminated by either us or Dai-ichi under specified
circumstances, including (i) there is an insolvency event with respect to the other party, (ii) if such termination is
necessary to comply with applicable law, effectively binding written or oral administrative guidance from a
governmental authority or an order by a governmental authority, (iii) if there is a material uncured breach of the
Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement by the other party, (iv) if during any consecutive five business day
period, Dai-ichi owns less than the applicable percentage of our issued and outstanding shares (subject to certain
exceptions), or (v) if we terminate Dai-ichi’s right to designate a representative to our Board of Directors. In addition,
we or Dai-ichi may terminate the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement following May 30, 2020 (the third
anniversary of the date of the Merger), upon 90 days written notice to the other party (which notice may not be given
prior to the third anniversary of the date of the Merger).
The Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement may be terminated by us if there is a change in Japanese
generally accepted accounting principles or other applicable accounting principles that would significantly increase the
burden to us in complying with our obligations to furnish certain financial and operating information to Dai-ichi, or if we
or any of our affiliates becomes subject to direct regulation by, or sanctions from, any Japanese governmental authority
that we would not be subject to in the absence of the strategic alliance.
The Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement may also be terminated by Dai-ichi if we inform Dai-ichi that we
are unable to comply with our obligations to furnish certain financial and operating information or there is a change in
applicable law in Japan that requires Dai-ichi to receive information that it is not already receiving from us, such
inability to comply or change in applicable law would, or would reasonably be expected to, result in Dai-ichi being in
violation of applicable law, and the parties following good faith discussions are unable to agree on appropriate changes
to our obligations to furnish certain information that would avoid Dai-ichi being in violation of applicable law. Dai-ichi
may also terminate the Amended Investment and Cooperation Agreement if (i) its percentage ownership has been diluted
to less than the applicable percentage of our issued and outstanding shares due to our issuance of new securities and Dai-
ichi was unable to prevent such dilution by exercising its preemptive rights, or by using commercially reasonable efforts
to purchase shares on the open market or (ii) Dai-ichi or any of its affiliates becomes subject to direct regulation by, or
sanctions from, any governmental authority (other than a Japanese, Jersey, UK, Australian or U.S. governmental
authority) that it would not be subject to in the absence of the strategic alliance.
Option Agreement
On October 3, 2016, Henderson and Dai-ichi entered into an option agreement (the “Option Agreement”) pursuant to
which, upon closing of the Merger, JHG granted Dai-ichi: (i) 11 tranches of conditional options with each tranche
allowing Dai-ichi to subscribe for or purchase 500,000 JHG shares at a strike price of 2,997.2 pence per share (the terms
of such options having been adjusted in accordance with the terms of the Option Agreement to take account of the effect
of the share consolidation), and (ii) nine tranches of conditional options with each tranche allowing Dai-ichi to subscribe
for or purchase 500,000 JHG shares at a strike price of 2,997.2 pence per share (the terms of such options having been
adjusted in accordance with the terms of the Option Agreement to take account of the effect of the share consolidation).
The options were exercisable by Dai-ichi for a period measured as the two-year period ending on the 24-month
anniversary of the date of the Option Agreement. Dai-ichi paid £19,778,800.00 for the options. The Option Agreement
was terminated in accordance with its provisions in October 2018.
As of December 31, 2019, Dai-ichi beneficially owned, in the aggregate, 30,668,922 shares of JHG common stock,
which represented approximately 16.4% of our issued and outstanding shares on such date.
For a discussion of related party transactions as defined in U.S. GAAP, see Item 8, Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 20 — Related Party Transactions.
Board of Directors Independence Determination
The Board of Directors has established criteria for determining if a director is independent from management. These
criteria follow the director independence criteria contained in the NYSE Listing Standards and are identified in our
Corporate Governance Guidelines (“Governance Guidelines”) available on our website at
http://www.janushenderson.com/group under the “About Janus Henderson” link, “Governance Policies and Statements.”
In determining the independence of the directors, the Board reviewed and considered all relationships between each
director (and any member of his or her immediate family) and us. Based on that review and our independence criteria,
138
139
Table of Contents Table of Contents the Board affirmatively determined that all directors are independent except for Mr. Weil, our CEO. In addition, all
members of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Risk Committees are independent.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Fees Incurred by JHG for PricewaterhouseCoopers
The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by the Group and its consolidated funds for audit and other services
provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers for fiscal years ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:
Audit fees (1)
Audit-related fees (2)
Tax fees (3)
All other fees (4)
Total
2019 ($)
3,023,000
916,957
13,867
595,155
4,548,979
2018 ($)
3,028,000
922,100
13,500
514,371
4,477,971
(1) Audit services consisted of the audit of JHG’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K, reviews of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, attestation work required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other audit services
that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings.
(2) Audit-related fees consisted of financial accounting and SEC reporting consultations, issuance of consent letters,
audit of JHG’s benefit plans and other audit services not required by statute or regulation.
(3) Tax compliance fees consisted of tax return filings for certain foreign jurisdictions, assistance with tax audits and
miscellaneous state and federal income tax-related issues.
(4) All other fees in 2018 and 2019 represent other non-audit-related fees.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the services described above is compatible with maintaining
the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures
All services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers were approved in accordance with the approval policy and
procedures adopted by the Audit Committee. This policy describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other
services (collectively, the “Disclosure Categories”) that our independent auditor may perform. The policy requires that a
description of the services expected to be performed by our independent auditor in each of the Disclosure Categories be
presented to the Audit Committee for approval and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally,
approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings. However, as previously mentioned the authority to grant specific
preapproval between meetings, as necessary, has been delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Chairman
must update the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting of any services that were granted specific
approval.
In addition, although not required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee generally approves a
narrow range of fees associated with each proposed service. Providing a range of fees for a service incorporates
appropriate oversight and control of the independent auditor relationship, while permitting JHG to receive immediate
assistance from the independent auditor when time is of the essence.
At each meeting, the Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-date against the original
approved services and the forecast of remaining services and fees for the fiscal year.
140
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
List of Documents Filed as Part of This Report
(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements and related notes, together with the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP dated February 26,
2020, appear in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
No financial statement schedules are required.
the Board affirmatively determined that all directors are independent except for Mr. Weil, our CEO. In addition, all
members of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Risk Committees are independent.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Fees Incurred by JHG for PricewaterhouseCoopers
The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by the Group and its consolidated funds for audit and other services
provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers for fiscal years ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively:
Audit fees (1)
Audit-related fees (2)
Tax fees (3)
All other fees (4)
Total
2019 ($)
2018 ($)
3,023,000
3,028,000
916,957
13,867
595,155
922,100
13,500
514,371
4,548,979
4,477,971
(1) Audit services consisted of the audit of JHG’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K, reviews of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, attestation work required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other audit services
that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings.
(2) Audit-related fees consisted of financial accounting and SEC reporting consultations, issuance of consent letters,
audit of JHG’s benefit plans and other audit services not required by statute or regulation.
(3) Tax compliance fees consisted of tax return filings for certain foreign jurisdictions, assistance with tax audits and
miscellaneous state and federal income tax-related issues.
(4) All other fees in 2018 and 2019 represent other non-audit-related fees.
The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of the services described above is compatible with maintaining
the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures
All services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers were approved in accordance with the approval policy and
procedures adopted by the Audit Committee. This policy describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax and other
services (collectively, the “Disclosure Categories”) that our independent auditor may perform. The policy requires that a
description of the services expected to be performed by our independent auditor in each of the Disclosure Categories be
presented to the Audit Committee for approval and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally,
approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings. However, as previously mentioned the authority to grant specific
preapproval between meetings, as necessary, has been delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Chairman
must update the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting of any services that were granted specific
approval.
In addition, although not required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee generally approves a
narrow range of fees associated with each proposed service. Providing a range of fees for a service incorporates
appropriate oversight and control of the independent auditor relationship, while permitting JHG to receive immediate
assistance from the independent auditor when time is of the essence.
At each meeting, the Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-date against the original
approved services and the forecast of remaining services and fees for the fiscal year.
140
141
Table of Contents Table of Contents
(3) List of Exhibits
Filed with this Report:
(b)
Exhibits
Exhibit No.
4.3
Description of Securities
Document
10.24
Janus Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.1
Form of US Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus
Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.2
Form of UK Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus
Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.3
Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus
Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.4
Form of US Fund Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus Henderson Group
Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.5
Form of UK Fund Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus Henderson Group
Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.6
Form of Matching Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the
Janus Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.25
Janus Henderson Group Global Remuneration Policy Statement
21.1
23.1
23.2
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
List of the Subsidiaries of the company prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation S-K
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Power of Attorney (included as a part of the Signature pages to this report)
Certification of Richard Weil, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant
Certification of Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant
Certification of Richard Weil, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification of Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Insurance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File
because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
142
Table of Contents
(3) List of Exhibits
Filed with this Report:
(b)
Exhibits
Exhibit No.
4.3
Description of Securities
Document
10.24
Janus Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.1
Form of US Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus
Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.2
Form of UK Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus
Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.3
Form of Performance Share Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus
Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.4
Form of US Fund Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus Henderson Group
Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.5
Form of UK Fund Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the Janus Henderson Group
Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.24.6
Form of Matching Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants to executive officers under the
Janus Henderson Group Third Amended and Restated 2010 Deferred Incentive Plan*
10.25
Janus Henderson Group Global Remuneration Policy Statement
21.1
23.1
23.2
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
List of the Subsidiaries of the company prepared pursuant to Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation S-K
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Power of Attorney (included as a part of the Signature pages to this report)
Certification of Richard Weil, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant
Certification of Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant
Certification of Richard Weil, Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Roger Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Insurance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File
because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded in the Inline XBRL
document)
* Compensatory plan or agreement.
Incorporated by reference:
Incorporated
Exhibit No.
Exhibit Description
2.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
4.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.2
10.1
(2) Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 3, 2016, by and among Janus Capital Group Inc.,
Henderson Group plc and Horizon Orbit Corp, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to
JCG’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 3, 2016 (File No. 001-15253)
(3) Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Memorandum of Association of Janus Henderson Group plc, is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.1 to JHG’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 30, 2017
Articles of Association of Janus Henderson Group plc, is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3.2 to JHG’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 30, 2017
(4) Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
Indenture dated as of November 6, 2001 (the “Base Indenture”), between Janus Capital Group Inc. and
The Bank of New York Trust Company N.A. (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank), is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to JCG’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated November 6,
2001 (File No. 001-15253)
Officer's Certificate pursuant to the Base Indenture establishing the terms of the 2025 Senior Notes is
hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to JCG's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 28,
2015 (File No. 001-15253)
Fifth Supplemental Indenture to the Base Indenture, dated as of May 30, 2017, among Janus Capital
Group Inc., Henderson Group plc and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company N.A., is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to JHG’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 30, 2017
Form of Global Notes for the 2025 Senior Notes, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to
JCG’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 31, 2015 (File No. 001-15253)
(10) Material Contracts
Facility Agreement, dated 16 February 2017, for US$200,000,000 Revolving Credit Facility for
Henderson Group plc arranged by Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited as Coordinator,
Bookrunner and Mandated Lead Arranger with Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited as
Facility Agent, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 1.1 to JHG’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated May 30, 2017
142
143
Table of Contents Table of Contents
10.2
10.3
10.3.1
10.3.2
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
Form of Instrument of Indemnity, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to JHG’s
Registration Statement on Form F-4, filed on March 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)
Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan, effective May 30, 2017, is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.12 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on
May 31, 2017 (File No. 333-218365)*
Form of Performance Share Unit Award, effective for awards granted in 2018 to the company’s co-Chief
Executive Officers Richard Weil and Andrew Formica, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.20.9
to JHG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018*
Long Term Incentive Award Acceptance Form with Appendix A (Terms of Restricted Stock Unit
Award), Appendix B (Additional Terms of Restricted Stock Unit Award) and Appendix C (Forfeiture
and Clawback) effective August 11, 2017 is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.32 to
JHG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
Second Amended and Restated 2005 Long Term Incentive Stock Plan, effective May 30, 2017, is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.11 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on
May 31, 2017 (File No. 333-218365)*
Second Amended and Restated 2012 Employment Inducement Award Plan, effective May 30, 2017, is
hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.9 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed
on May 31, 2017 (File No. 333-218365)*
Third Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective April 1, 2019, is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.19.9 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on May 2, 2019 (File
No. 333-218365)*
Janus Henderson Group plc Fourth Amended and Restated Mutual Fund Share Investment Plan, effective
May 30, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on
August 8, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
Janus Henderson Group plc Amended and Restated 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan,
effective January 1, 2013, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to JHG’s Form 10-Q,
filed on August 8, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
Janus Henderson Group plc Second Amended and Restated Income Deferral Program, effective May 30,
2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.9 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on August 8,
2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
Janus Henderson Group plc Fourth Amended and Restated Director Deferred Fee Plan, effective May 30,
2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on August 8,
2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
Henderson Group plc Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.7 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
333-216824)*
Henderson Group Sharesave Scheme, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to JHG’s
Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
The Henderson Executive Shared Ownership Plan (ExSOP), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.9 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
333-216824)*
Rules of the Henderson Group plc Deferred Equity Plan (DEP), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.10 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
333-216824)*
144
Table of Contents
10.2
10.3
Form of Instrument of Indemnity, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.16 to JHG’s
Registration Statement on Form F-4, filed on March 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)
Second Amended and Restated 2010 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan, effective May 30, 2017, is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.12 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on
May 31, 2017 (File No. 333-218365)*
10.3.1
Form of Performance Share Unit Award, effective for awards granted in 2018 to the company’s co-Chief
Executive Officers Richard Weil and Andrew Formica, is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.20.9
to JHG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018*
10.3.2
Long Term Incentive Award Acceptance Form with Appendix A (Terms of Restricted Stock Unit
Award), Appendix B (Additional Terms of Restricted Stock Unit Award) and Appendix C (Forfeiture
and Clawback) effective August 11, 2017 is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.32 to
JHG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
10.4
Second Amended and Restated 2005 Long Term Incentive Stock Plan, effective May 30, 2017, is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.11 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on
May 31, 2017 (File No. 333-218365)*
10.5
Second Amended and Restated 2012 Employment Inducement Award Plan, effective May 30, 2017, is
hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.9 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed
on May 31, 2017 (File No. 333-218365)*
10.6
Third Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective April 1, 2019, is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.19.9 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on May 2, 2019 (File
No. 333-218365)*
10.7
Janus Henderson Group plc Fourth Amended and Restated Mutual Fund Share Investment Plan, effective
May 30, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on
August 8, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
10.8
Janus Henderson Group plc Amended and Restated 2013 Management Incentive Compensation Plan,
effective January 1, 2013, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to JHG’s Form 10-Q,
filed on August 8, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
10.9
Janus Henderson Group plc Second Amended and Restated Income Deferral Program, effective May 30,
2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.9 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on August 8,
10.10
Janus Henderson Group plc Fourth Amended and Restated Director Deferred Fee Plan, effective May 30,
2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 to JHG’s Form 10-Q, filed on August 8,
2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
10.11
Henderson Group plc Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.7 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
10.12
Henderson Group Sharesave Scheme, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to JHG’s
Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
10.13
The Henderson Executive Shared Ownership Plan (ExSOP), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.9 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
10.14
Rules of the Henderson Group plc Deferred Equity Plan (DEP), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.10 to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
333-216824)*
333-216824)*
333-216824)*
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.19.1
10.19.2
10.19.3
10.19.4
10.19.5
10.19.6
10.19.7
10.19.8
10.20
10.21
Trust Deed of the Henderson Buy-As-You-Earn Plan (BAYE), is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.11 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No.
333-216824)*
The Henderson Group plc Company Share Option Plan, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.12 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
Rules of the Henderson Group plc International Buy As You Earn Plan (International BAYE), is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on
March, 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
Henderson Group plc Restricted Share Plan, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 to
JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on March, 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
Janus Capital Group Inc. 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended and restated,
effective January 1, 2014, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to JCG’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (File No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 1 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective January 1, 2014, is hereby incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.9 to JCG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (File
No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 2 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective January 1, 2015, is hereby incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.9.2 to JCG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (File
No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 3 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective January 1, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.9.3 to JCG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (File
No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 4 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective September 1, 2016, is hereby incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.9.4 to JCG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016 (File No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 5 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective September 1, 2016, is hereby incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.9.5 to JCG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016 (File No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 6 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective August 31, 2016, is hereby incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.9.6 to JCG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (File
No. 001-15253)
Amendment No. 7 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective July 1, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.19.7 to JHG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No.
001-38103)
Amendment No. 8 to Janus 401(k) Plan, effective December 28, 2017, is hereby incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.19.8 to JHG’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017 (File No. 001-38103)
Service agreement between Janus Henderson Group and Richard Weil, effective from August 1, 2018, is
hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.33 to JHG’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2018 (File No. 001-38103)*
Summary of Janus Henderson Group plc Non-Executive Director Compensation Program effective
May 30, 2017, is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.24 to JHG’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (File No. 001-38103)*
144
145
Table of Contents Table of Contents
10.22
10.23
Amended and Restated Investment and Strategic Cooperation Agreement, dated October 3, 2016, by and
among Henderson Group plc, Janus Capital Group Inc. and Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc., is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4, filed on
March 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)
Service Agreement between Henderson Group plc and Roger Thompson, effective from June 26, 2013,
is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4,
filed on March 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
* Compensatory plan or agreement.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
146
Table of Contents
10.22
Amended and Restated Investment and Strategic Cooperation Agreement, dated October 3, 2016, by and
among Henderson Group plc, Janus Capital Group Inc. and Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc., is hereby
incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4, filed on
March 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)
10.23
Service Agreement between Henderson Group plc and Roger Thompson, effective from June 26, 2013,
is hereby incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to JHG’s Registration Statement on Form F-4,
filed on March 20, 2017 (File No. 333-216824)*
* Compensatory plan or agreement.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Signatures
Janus Henderson Group plc
By:
/s/ RICHARD WEIL
Richard Weil
Chief Executive Officer
February 26, 2020
Known all persons by these presents, that each person whose signatures appear below, hereby constitute and appoint
Richard Weil and Michelle Rosenberg, and each of them individually (with full power to act alone), as their true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents to sign and execute and file with the Securities Exchange Commission on behalf of
the undersigned, any amendments to Janus Henderson Group plc’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2019, and any instrument or document filed as part of, as an exhibit to, or in connection with any
amendment, and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm as his or her own act and deed all that said
attorneys shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 26, 2020.
Signature/Name
/s/ RICHARD GILLINGWATER
Richard Gillingwater
/s/ GLENN SCHAFER
Glenn Schafer
/s/ RICHARD WEIL
Richard Weil
/s/ ROGER THOMPSON
Roger Thompson
/s/ BRENNAN HUGHES
Brennan Hughes
/s/ KALPANA DESAI
Kalpana Desai
/s/ JEFFREY DIERMEIER
Jeffrey Diermeier
/s/ KEVIN DOLAN
Kevin Dolan
Title
Chairman of the Board
Deputy Chairman of the Board
Director and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
146
147
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Signature/Name
/s/ EUGENE FLOOD JR
Eugene Flood Jr
/s/ LAWRENCE KOCHARD
Lawrence Kochard
/s/ ANGELA SEYMOUR-JACKSON
Angela Seymour-Jackson
/s/ TATSUSABURO YAMAMOTO
Tatsusaburo Yamamoto
Title
Director
Director
Director
Director
148
Table of Contents
Shareholder information
As at 21 February 2020
171
Total number of holders of shares, CDIs, UK DIs and their voting rights
The issued share capital of Janus Henderson Group plc consisted of 186,975,693 shares held by 42,918 security holders. This included: 42,865,650 shares
held by CHESS Depositary Nominees Pty Limited (CDN), quoted on the ASX in the form of CHESS Depositary Interests (CDIs) and held by 37,526 CDI
holders; and 2,835,249 UK depositary interests (UK DIs), each representing an entitlement to one underlying Janus Henderson ordinary share and held
by 3,657 UK DI holders either through CREST or via the Janus Henderson Corporate Sponsored Nominee Facility. Each registered holder of shares
present in person (or by proxy, attorney or representative) at a meeting of shareholders has one vote on a vote taken by a show of hands, and one vote
for each fully paid share held on a vote taken on a poll. CDI holders can instruct CDN to appoint a proxy on their behalf and can direct the proxy how to
vote on the basis of one vote per person taken by a show of hands, and one vote per CDI on a vote taken on a poll.
Securities subject to voluntary escrow
30,668,992 ordinary shares are currently held by Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. (Dai-ichi). Under the Amended and Restated Investment and Strategic
Cooperation Agreement between Dai-ichi and the Company, Dai-ichi is subject to certain limitations on its ability to transfer its Janus Henderson shares,
including that Dai-ichi may not, without the Company’s prior written consent, transfer shares to any person who would beneficially own 5% or more of the
Company’s common stock after the transfer. The Company is generally entitled to a right of first offer or a right of first refusal, depending on the nature
of the proposed transfer, with respect to any proposed transfer by Dai-ichi of its Janus Henderson shares.
Twenty largest share/CDI/UK DI holders
1 CEDE & Co
2 HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
J.P. Morgan Nominees Australia Pty Limited
3
4 National Nominees Limited
5 Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
6 HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above